text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
i |
| i |
χ ψ 2. |
i |
|h | i| |
17 |
This means first of all that every quantum computation is inherently probabilis- |
tic. Observing (a part of) the quantum memory isnot exactly thesame as “printing |
the output”. We must plan a series of runs of the same quantum program and the |
subsequent classical processing of the observed results, and we can hope only to get |
the desired answer with probability close to one. |
Furthermore, thismeansthatbyimplementing quantumparallelismsimplemind- |
edly as in (14), and then observing the memory as if it were the classical n–bit |
register, we will simply get some value F(x) with probability 1/N. This does not |
use the potential of the quantum parallelism. Therefore we formulate a corrected |
version of this notion, leaving more flexibility and stressing the additional tasks of |
the designer, each of which eventually contributes to the complexity estimate. |
2.3. Quantum parallel processing: version II. To solve efficiently a prob- |
lem involving properties of the graph of a function F, we must design: |
(i) An auxiliary unitary operator U carrying the relevant information about the |
graph of F. |
(ii) A computationally feasible realization of U with the help of standard quantum |
gates. |
(iii) A computationally feasible realization of the input subroutine. |
(iv) A computationally feasible classical algorithm processing the results of many |
runs of quantum computation. |
All of this must be supplemented by quantum error–correcting encoding, which |
wewillnot address here. Inthenext sectionwe willdiscuss somestandard quantum |
subroutines. |
3. Selected quantum subroutines |
3.1. Initialization. Using the same conventions as in (14) and the subsequent |
H⊗n, |
comments, in particular, the identification H = we have |
n 1 |
N−1 ⊗n |
1 1 1 |
x = ǫ ...ǫ = ( 0 + 1 ) . (15) |
n−1 0 |
√N | i √N | i (cid:18)√2 | i | i (cid:19) |
xX=0 ǫiX=0,1 |
In other words, |
N−1 |
1 |
(n−1) (0) |
x = U ...U 0...0 (16) |
√N | i 1 1 | i |
xX=0 |
where U : H H is the unitary operator |
1 1 1 |
→ |
1 1 |
0 ( 0 + 1 ), 1 ( 0 1 ), |
| i 7→ √2 | i | i | i 7→ √2 | i−| i |
18 |
(i) |
and U = id U id acts only on the i–th qubit. |
1 ⊗···⊗ 1 ⊗···⊗ |
Thus making the quantum gate U act on each memory bit, one can in n steps |
1 |
initialize our register in the state which is the superposition of all 2n classical states |
with equal weights. |
3.2. Quantum computations of classical functions. Let be a finite basis |
B |
ofclassicalgatescontainingone–bitidentityandgeneratingallBooleancircuits, and |
F : Fm Fn a function. We will describe how to turn a Boolean circuit of length |
2 → 2 |
L calculating F into another Boolean circuit of comparable length consisting only |
of reversible gates, and calculating a modified function, which however contains all |
information about the graph of F. Reversibility means that each step is a bijection |
(actually, an involution) and hence can be extended to a unitary operator, that is, |
a quantum gate. For a gate f, define f( x,y ) = x,f(x)+y as in 2.2(D) above. |
| i | i |
3.2.1. Claim. A Boolean circuite of length L in the basis can be pro- |
S B |
cessed into the reversible Boolean circuit of length O((L+m+n)2) calculating a |
S |
permutation H : Fm+n+L Fm+n+L with the following property: |
2 → 2 e |
H(x,y,0)= (x,F(x)+y,0) = (F(x,y),0). |
e |
Here x,y,z have sizes m,n,L respectively. |
Proof. We will understand L here as the sum of sizes of the outputs of all |
gates involved in the description of . We first replace in each gate f by its |
S S |
reversible counterpart f. This involves inserting extra bits which we put side by |
side into a new register of total length L. The resulting subcircuit will calculate |
e |
a permutation K : Fm+L Fm+L such that K(x,0) = (F(x),G(x)) for some |
2 → 2 |
function G (garbage). |
Nowaddtothememoryonemoreregisterofsizenkeepingthevariabley.Extend |
K to the permutation K : Fm+L+n Fm+L+n keeping y intact: K : (x,0,y) |
2 → 2 7→ |
(F(x),G(x),y).Clearly, K is calculated by the same boolean circuit as K, but with |
extended register. |
Extend this circuit by the one adding the contents of the first and the third |
register: (F(x),G(x),y) (F(x),G(x),F(x)+y). Finally, build the last extension |
7→ |
which calculates K¯−1 and consists of reversed gates calculating K in reverse order. |
This clears the middle register (scratchpad) and produces (x,0,F(x) + y). The |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.