text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
correspondence between the sets. If the one-to-one correspondence is between |
a set X and a subset of the natural numbers, then it can be used to count, or |
enumerate, the elements in X. Such an enumeration also provides an ordering |
ofthe elements inthe set, as the following paragraphmakesexplicit in the case |
of strings. |
The number of elements in a set is called its cardinality. A finite set has a |
cardinality which is a natural number. An infinite set, the elements of which |
5As we will see, when the sets X and Y are infinite, just a denumerable subset of all |
possiblefunctionsaccordingtothisdefinitionareactuallypossibletocomputebyalgorithmic |
methods. |
18 |
can be put in a one-to-one correspondence with the set N of natural numbers, |
is said to have cardinality . |
0 |
ℵ |
Lexicographic ordering |
Itis oftenusefultobe abletoorderstringsinalexicographicorder. Thedefini- |
tionis mimickedonthe orderingof wordsinthe Englishlanguage. Anexample |
makes the concept clear. Suppose Σ = S ,S ,S , then the lexicographic |
1 2 3 |
{ } |
ordering of the strings is the infinite list |
[ ,S ,S ,S ,S S ,S S ,S S ,S S ,S S ,S S ,...]. |
1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 3 |
E |
We can define a function lex from set of all strings Σ to the set of integers |
∗ |
N, |
lex:Σ N, |
∗ |
→ |
where in particular lex( )=0. |
E |
Clearly,the lexicographicorderingprovidesanenumerationofthe stringsin |
the language. |
2.1.7 Decision procedures and Computation procedures |
Itissometimesusefultodistinguishbetweenalgorithmsforcomputingvaluesof |
functionsandalgorithmsforyes/nodecisions. Inthefirstcase,theobjectofthe |
algorithm is to compute values for functions f : Nd N. Such an algorithm |
→ |
can be called a computation procedure. Since it is possible to set up one-to-one |
correspondencesbetweennaturalnumbersandstrings,computationprocedures |
can also be viewed as string processing; an input string w is processed into an |
output string f(w). In this case we are considering functions f :Σ Σ . But |
∗ ∗ |
→ |
it is often natural to think of computation procedures as computing values of |
numerical functions. |
In the second case, the object is to decide questions like for example; Is the |
numbernprime? Doesthenumberadividethenumberb? Suchquestionsdefine |
properties P(n), binary relations R(a,b), or in the general case, n-ary relations |
R(a ,...,a ). Algorithms for such questions are called decision procedures. |
1 n |
Decisionprocedures areoften formulatedinterms of languages. A language |
is a set of strings constructed in some way or satisfying certain properties. The |
problem is to determine for an arbitrary string over the alphabet whether it |
belongs to the language or not. This is a typical decision problem, having a |
yes or no answer. In fact, all decision problems can be formulated in terms of |
language membership. We will return to these notions in section 2.3.4. |
19 |
2.2 A note on the connection to everyday com- |
puting |
The contents of this chapter might seem remote from everyday computers and |
their uses, and it is perhaps interesting to make a comment on the connection. |
As already remarked, many algorithms are not meant to terminate. We could |
takeawordprocessorasanexample. Awordprocessorisacomplicatedpieceof |
software, which apart from presenting the user with a graphical interface, also |
should respond to input from the keyboard as well as files read from storage |
media. Such programs are said to be event-driven. This means that they only |
perform actions when called for by request from the user, otherwise they are |
idle. (Theremightbe actionslike rewritingthe screeninvokedbyotherparallel |
running processes.) When the user hits a key, this triggers a computation that |
results in the text stored in the memory and displayed on the screen being |
altered. This can in fact be seen as a computation of a function, or better still, |
asstringprocessing. Theinputisthepresenttextstored(thecodedtextreally) |
together with the code for the key. The output is the new text. Depending |
on what action is requested, different computations are performed on the text. |
Thus the concept of a computation is very strong and in fact incorporates all |
types of data processing made by digital computers. |
2.3 The classical Turing machine model of com- |
putation |
In a mathematical oriented approach to the theory of computability the dis- |
tinction between passive algorithm and active computation can easily be over- |
looked. Just one example will suffice to make the point clear. Most popular |
or semi-popular accounts of Turing Machines abound with animistic phrases |
like reading, writing, moving etc. This conjures up the image of a magnetic |
read-and-write head moving along the tape, erasing and writing information. |
Exact mathematical notions can replace this suggestive but imprecise termi- |
nology, one classic example of which is [16]. On the other hand, upon reading |
such a mathematical account of computability, it seems that the mathematical |
formulation has got rid of all reference to motion or time steps. Close scrutiny |
howeverrevealsthedistinctionbetweenalgorithmandcomputationeveninthis |
case. The Turing machine program is the set of instructions for the machine |
together with specification how to present the machine with data and how to |
read off data. This is clearly passive. However in order to actually perform the |
computation inherent in the set of instructions, someone, machine or human, |
has to perform the computational steps. |
20 |
2.3.1 Informal description of Turing machines |
A very good description of Turing machines can be found i Turing’s original |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.