prompt stringlengths 22 39.2k | prompt_id stringlengths 64 64 | chosen listlengths 2 2 | rejected listlengths 2 2 | messages listlengths 2 2 | score_chosen float64 5.19 10 | score_rejected float64 0 10 | other_info dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 10 | 3.727273 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 80,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.2727272727,
"raw_score_rejected": 11,
"seconds_difference": 26195,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 10 | 3.727273 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 80,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.2727272727,
"raw_score_rejected": 11,
"seconds_difference": 1308,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 80,
"raw_score_ratio": 16,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 15364,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 80,
"raw_score_ratio": 13.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 19685,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 80,
"raw_score_ratio": 16,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 23357,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.538462 | 6.447552 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.0909090909,
"raw_score_rejected": 22,
"seconds_difference": 14581,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.538462 | 6.275304 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2631578947,
"raw_score_rejected": 19,
"seconds_difference": 13360,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.538462 | 6.038462 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 16,
"seconds_difference": 18673,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.538462 | 5.356643 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.1818181818,
"raw_score_rejected": 11,
"seconds_difference": 18856,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.538462 | 2.738462 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.8,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 8025,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.538462 | 3.538462 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 12346,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.538462 | 2.738462 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 24,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.8,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 16018,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.410256 | 6.035256 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.375,
"raw_score_rejected": 16,
"seconds_difference": 4092,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.410256 | 5.410256 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 11,
"seconds_difference": 4275,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.410256 | 3.010256 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.4,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 1437,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.217949 | 6.030449 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.1875,
"raw_score_rejected": 16,
"seconds_difference": 5313,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.217949 | 5.490676 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.7272727273,
"raw_score_rejected": 11,
"seconds_difference": 5496,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.217949 | 3.417949 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 19,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.8,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 2658,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 6.025641 | 5.571096 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.4545454545,
"raw_score_rejected": 11,
"seconds_difference": 183,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.769231 | 5.678322 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.0909090909,
"raw_score_rejected": 11,
"seconds_difference": 38865,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.769231 | 5.678322 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.0909090909,
"raw_score_rejected": 11,
"seconds_difference": 13978,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.769231 | 4.369231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.4,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 28034,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.769231 | 4.369231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.4,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 5357,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.769231 | 4.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 32355,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.769231 | 4.369231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.4,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 36027,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.705128 | 4.505128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 14056,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.705128 | 4.871795 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.8333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 18377,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.705128 | 4.505128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 22049,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.576923 | 4.776923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.8,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 33513,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.576923 | 4.776923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.8,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 10836,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.576923 | 5.076923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 6,
"seconds_difference": 37834,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.576923 | 4.776923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.8,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 41506,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.576923 | 2.076923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 2690,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.384615 | 5.184615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 3672,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 2820,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 3651,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
What do you think the "outcome" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually "uncatchable." Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so they're easy to check by just looking up the citations. Additionally, IME many AI-generated pieces are fairly stilted in their language use. But some day that won't be the case. In fact, some day it may be possible that AI can essentially create an otherwise legitimate, well-done paper (as in, pull real sources together and create a novel document from them) with little student input. How do you think higher ed will adapt? (I'm thinking mostly about teaching/testing students, but if you want to talk about research and scientific writing, feel free!) I feel like if we can somehow get away from this "college is to get a job" so that many/most students don't actually care about the learning but are just there to check a box we might be able to just generally reduce the impetus to cheat in general, but that will require some significant societal change. I was thinking that in many fields that might ask you to write a paper (as opposed to sit an exam during class time where you couldn't access an AI bot) we may benefit from giving up the "arms race" and returning to a model of oral examinations. Each student meets with the instructor (small classes) or 1-2 TAs in a team of several (larger classes) and basically take an oral examination. Examinations can be recorded for review if there are complains/questions afterward. But then I thought about how many students these days have anxiety-related or similar concerns if not full out accommodations and how much that would probably increase if students knew they'd regularly have to do oral examinations. Additionally, it may be hard to have every student receive fair, equal-difficulty tests without giving them the same questions to answer, yet if you give them all the same questions it would be difficult to prevent early test takers from telling others what they will be asked. So I am curious, what do y'all see as the way forward in a world of AI bots doing homework? | 98f94f0c4e2eab5306ad2b1ef0ba0e27bb74b8ef605694ec4172e89cd8aa8b55 | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | [
{
"content": "What do you think the \"outcome\" of trying to prevent cheating via AI will look like? I was just glancing at this post and it's gotten me thinking about what happens when AI is well-developed enough to be virtually \"uncatchable.\" Right now AI can make up legit-looking but not real sources so th... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zxtsxo",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 7725,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working hard to rally around increased stipends. Given current inflation and workers' rights entering the public discourse (?), do you expect stipends to raise in the coming years? (Asking both for selfish reasons, and genuine curiosity.) For clarity: Not just increasing to meet inflation, but a general increase which surpasses that. Interested in any thoughts!! | d8a1c9166b3bb2d01df4edab96baddd1cee55e8327e54aec3376567aa01b5d2b | [
{
"content": "Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working ha... | [
{
"content": "Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working ha... | [
{
"content": "Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working ha... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zkkiil",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 1476,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working hard to rally around increased stipends. Given current inflation and workers' rights entering the public discourse (?), do you expect stipends to raise in the coming years? (Asking both for selfish reasons, and genuine curiosity.) For clarity: Not just increasing to meet inflation, but a general increase which surpasses that. Interested in any thoughts!! | d8a1c9166b3bb2d01df4edab96baddd1cee55e8327e54aec3376567aa01b5d2b | [
{
"content": "Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working ha... | [
{
"content": "Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working ha... | [
{
"content": "Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working ha... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zkkiil",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 7762,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working hard to rally around increased stipends. Given current inflation and workers' rights entering the public discourse (?), do you expect stipends to raise in the coming years? (Asking both for selfish reasons, and genuine curiosity.) For clarity: Not just increasing to meet inflation, but a general increase which surpasses that. Interested in any thoughts!! | d8a1c9166b3bb2d01df4edab96baddd1cee55e8327e54aec3376567aa01b5d2b | [
{
"content": "Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working ha... | [
{
"content": "Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working ha... | [
{
"content": "Do You Expect PhD Stipends to Increase in the Near Future? I am a first-year Masters student (social sciences), interested in pursuing a PhD after a few years in the field. Every time I research stipends, I am ... scared. At my university (R1, U.S. Northeast), the Grad Student Union is working ha... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zkkiil",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 6286,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 6.282051 | 3.282051 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 20,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 2495,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 6.282051 | 3.282051 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 20,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 32,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 6.282051 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 20,
"raw_score_ratio": 10,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 3391,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.833333 | 4.233333 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 13,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 4219,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.833333 | 4.233333 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 13,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 1756,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.833333 | 0.333333 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 13,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 5115,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.705128 | 4.505128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 8050,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.705128 | 4.505128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 5587,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.705128 | 3.955128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 139,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.705128 | 1.205128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 5.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 8946,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.641026 | 4.641026 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 10,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 8581,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.641026 | 4.641026 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 10,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 6118,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.641026 | 4.141026 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 10,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 670,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.641026 | 1.641026 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 10,
"raw_score_ratio": 5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 9477,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.512821 | 4.912821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 12273,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.512821 | 4.912821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 9810,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.512821 | 4.512821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 4362,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.512821 | 2.512821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 13169,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 896,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 3359,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go "fuck it, I'm not wasting any more of my time in this shitty manuscript"?**. I'm gonna vent here. I'm a predoc in an engineering field and I consider myself lucky when journals contact me to do peer reviews of manuscripts submitted to them. I gladly accept, since I think it is an opportunity to improve my own scientific skills and insight in the peer reviewing process as an author myself. I would like to talk about the whole peer reviewing process from the point of view of a reviewer. Recently I got a request do a peer review for a relatively high IF journal in my field. I got excited because I always gain a lot of knowledge from these. However, the manuscript was a complete wreck. Just to point-out some issues I had with it: - Some latex math expressions were not even compiled right, instead the PDF showed garbage. - Some figures had no captions. (No Figure 1: bla bla) - Some references in the text to Figures where obviously wrong, pointing to figures that made no sense. - The basic english spelling and grammar errors. I'm not a native english-speaker myself, so I normally check the "I'm not able to judge", but man, it was bad. Seriously bad. - The figures were rasterized to the point that I could not even read some stuff even zooming-in the PDF. And thats just formatting... Moving into conceptual issues, the paper clearly stated that they surpassed a previous work by other authors. That raised some eyebrows. I though "bold", whatever, let's see. What bothered me was the *tone*. It was super assertive, demeaning the efforts of the other authors. Well shit, their manuscript was utter shit to begin with. **We are at page 3 of 10...**. At this point, I thought "enough". I logged-in, commented a little bit about the severe lack of care put into the manuscript and gave it a Reject grade. So, what makes you stop midway of peer reviewing a paper to simply grade it with a Reject? | 25fbe83b0c42858ad5f54bb9b805981079b92e01e05e06d3a9509633f4e118c6 | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | [
{
"content": "Doing peer reviews -- what does it take for you to stop reading and simply give the paper a Reject? **TL;DR** where do you set the line and simply stop reading to give the manuscript a Reject when you're doing a peer review of a manuscript for a relatively high IF journal? **What makes you go \"f... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "fn0x3w",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 8807,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.77
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 6.410256 | 1.910256 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 5.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 321,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.769231 | 5.435897 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 9,
"seconds_difference": 27437,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.769231 | 5.054945 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.7142857143,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 13131,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.769231 | 3.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 24399,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.769231 | 3.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 44609,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.769231 | 3.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 33416,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.769231 | 2.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 26871,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.769231 | 2.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 8484,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.705128 | 5.482906 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2222222222,
"raw_score_rejected": 9,
"seconds_difference": 40057,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.705128 | 5.1337 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5714285714,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 25751,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.705128 | 3.955128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 37019,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.705128 | 3.955128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 57229,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.705128 | 3.955128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 46036,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.705128 | 3.038462 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 2291,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.705128 | 3.038462 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 39491,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.705128 | 3.038462 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 21104,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.705128 | 1.205128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 11,
"raw_score_ratio": 5.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 3905,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.576923 | 4.326923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 17172,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.576923 | 4.326923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 5979,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.448718 | 4.698718 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 7,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 11268,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.448718 | 4.698718 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 7,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 31478,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.448718 | 4.698718 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 7,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 20285,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.448718 | 4.115385 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 7,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 13740,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.320513 | 5.070513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 37048,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.25641 | 4.923077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 2472,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.320513 | 5.070513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 57258,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.320513 | 5.070513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 46065,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 2320,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 39520,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 21133,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 3934,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 1614,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 10983,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - this is just going to be the reality until I become more efficient or get more grant funding If I wait until Monday AM, I spend half the day sending emails from the work I've done over the weekend I do not want others to think I expect a response immediately, especially students Any examples of email signatures about not expecting an immediate response? Most I find online are related to "I work flexible work hours, I do not expect an immediate response." I may be splitting hairs but I don't work flexible hours - I'm just always working | a6a122eb0049cc58848ace02abc0d0f76a3be23319f80ffc1d87fd83b8ee6d99 | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | [
{
"content": "Examples of email signatures relaying you do not expect others to reply to your email send after hours For better or worse, it is easier for me to send emails on weekends and evenings to collaborators and students than during business hours. I do a lot of my writing during evenings/weekends - thi... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "ytife6",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 337,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
PhDs in history, what are some good ways to organize notes and evidence apart from long text files? I have accumulated lists and lists of various things (interesting figures alive in my period, existing manuscripts, interesting academics to meet, notes from secondary sources, potential epitaphs...) and I seem to drown in it all, sometimes forgetting what I have already done and thus needlessly repeating things. Is there any better way to organize the process of research by making use of certain new tools (interactive mind maps, different ways to visualize notes)? I have this tool called Milanote which looks very cool but I am not sure if cool-looking software can solve problems of a methodological kind. | 7097a46f97cffac4b5f0bc58ad63195222d9c0407f7700faf19a5276438a2001 | [
{
"content": "PhDs in history, what are some good ways to organize notes and evidence apart from long text files? I have accumulated lists and lists of various things (interesting figures alive in my period, existing manuscripts, interesting academics to meet, notes from secondary sources, potential epitaphs...... | [
{
"content": "PhDs in history, what are some good ways to organize notes and evidence apart from long text files? I have accumulated lists and lists of various things (interesting figures alive in my period, existing manuscripts, interesting academics to meet, notes from secondary sources, potential epitaphs...... | [
{
"content": "PhDs in history, what are some good ways to organize notes and evidence apart from long text files? I have accumulated lists and lists of various things (interesting figures alive in my period, existing manuscripts, interesting academics to meet, notes from secondary sources, potential epitaphs...... | 5.384615 | 5.184615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tcofti",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 35613,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would last (I had intentions of asking her to marry me). Because she was still in school, I was trying to remain flexible in where I applied, and the end result was that I probably didn't apply to as many posted positions as I could / should have. This year... well, the relationship ended, and ironically, I think it's been good for me in terms of career aspirations and preparation. In the last year I've submitted (and published) more manuscripts, my CV is looking considerably more competitive for the kinds of positions I'm looking for, and because I'm no longer worrying about someone else w/respect to location, I'm applying to any position that fits my research interests. I don't think I'd be doing any of that if I was in a relationship right now, and even though I miss the companionship, maybe this is the best thing at the moment. How many of you are having to deal with some aspect of this right now (or have in the past)? Any advice, for now or the future? | 2452426a4f982fc3b979319e8a45065ee7bd8d83347a5ef90f382db2dab4f4cc | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | 6.410256 | 1.910256 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "3gcrog",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 5.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 141,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would last (I had intentions of asking her to marry me). Because she was still in school, I was trying to remain flexible in where I applied, and the end result was that I probably didn't apply to as many posted positions as I could / should have. This year... well, the relationship ended, and ironically, I think it's been good for me in terms of career aspirations and preparation. In the last year I've submitted (and published) more manuscripts, my CV is looking considerably more competitive for the kinds of positions I'm looking for, and because I'm no longer worrying about someone else w/respect to location, I'm applying to any position that fits my research interests. I don't think I'd be doing any of that if I was in a relationship right now, and even though I miss the companionship, maybe this is the best thing at the moment. How many of you are having to deal with some aspect of this right now (or have in the past)? Any advice, for now or the future? | 2452426a4f982fc3b979319e8a45065ee7bd8d83347a5ef90f382db2dab4f4cc | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | 6.410256 | 0.076923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "3gcrog",
"raw_score_chosen": 22,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 2158,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would last (I had intentions of asking her to marry me). Because she was still in school, I was trying to remain flexible in where I applied, and the end result was that I probably didn't apply to as many posted positions as I could / should have. This year... well, the relationship ended, and ironically, I think it's been good for me in terms of career aspirations and preparation. In the last year I've submitted (and published) more manuscripts, my CV is looking considerably more competitive for the kinds of positions I'm looking for, and because I'm no longer worrying about someone else w/respect to location, I'm applying to any position that fits my research interests. I don't think I'd be doing any of that if I was in a relationship right now, and even though I miss the companionship, maybe this is the best thing at the moment. How many of you are having to deal with some aspect of this right now (or have in the past)? Any advice, for now or the future? | 2452426a4f982fc3b979319e8a45065ee7bd8d83347a5ef90f382db2dab4f4cc | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | 5.384615 | 4.884615 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "3gcrog",
"raw_score_chosen": 6,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 21595,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would last (I had intentions of asking her to marry me). Because she was still in school, I was trying to remain flexible in where I applied, and the end result was that I probably didn't apply to as many posted positions as I could / should have. This year... well, the relationship ended, and ironically, I think it's been good for me in terms of career aspirations and preparation. In the last year I've submitted (and published) more manuscripts, my CV is looking considerably more competitive for the kinds of positions I'm looking for, and because I'm no longer worrying about someone else w/respect to location, I'm applying to any position that fits my research interests. I don't think I'd be doing any of that if I was in a relationship right now, and even though I miss the companionship, maybe this is the best thing at the moment. How many of you are having to deal with some aspect of this right now (or have in the past)? Any advice, for now or the future? | 2452426a4f982fc3b979319e8a45065ee7bd8d83347a5ef90f382db2dab4f4cc | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | [
{
"content": "PhDs on the job market, how many of you are in relationships and how is that affecting your choices for where to apply (if at all)? It's an interesting comparison for me between last year and this year. Last year at this time, I was in a committed, long-term relationship that I expected would las... | 5.25641 | 4.923077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "3gcrog",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 2017,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.76
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.