Datasets:
willtheorangeguy
/
2016-Go-Time-Transcripts

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
text
stringlengths
0
1.82k
[1901.36 --> 1902.28] you would be
[1902.28 --> 1902.80] able to take
[1902.80 --> 1903.40] advantage of
[1903.40 --> 1903.94] Goa Gen to
[1903.94 --> 1904.38] generate all
[1904.38 --> 1904.74] those other
[1904.74 --> 1905.10] things.
[1905.88 --> 1906.06] You know,
[1906.16 --> 1906.72] if you started
[1906.72 --> 1907.12] that to your
[1907.12 --> 1907.76] brain.
[1907.98 --> 1908.46] Pardon me?
[1909.04 --> 1909.70] He's assigning
[1909.70 --> 1910.24] that to you.
[1910.60 --> 1911.70] I was just
[1911.70 --> 1912.02] going to say,
[1912.14 --> 1912.74] if you started
[1912.74 --> 1913.40] with a Swagger
[1913.40 --> 1914.42] specification and
[1914.42 --> 1915.14] you generated
[1915.14 --> 1917.04] a Goa DSL
[1917.04 --> 1918.16] and then the
[1918.16 --> 1918.92] Goa DSL
[1918.92 --> 1919.64] generated a
[1919.64 --> 1919.90] Swagger
[1919.90 --> 1920.48] specification,
[1920.86 --> 1921.46] you could set
[1921.46 --> 1921.98] that thing
[1921.98 --> 1922.78] into an
[1922.78 --> 1923.68] endless loop
[1923.68 --> 1924.74] and by the
[1924.74 --> 1925.08] end of it,
[1925.10 --> 1925.48] it would be
[1925.48 --> 1926.16] Turing complete.
[1927.62 --> 1928.06] Yes,
[1928.24 --> 1928.62] it would be
[1928.62 --> 1929.10] actually very
[1929.10 --> 1929.68] interesting to
[1929.68 --> 1930.80] see how the
[1930.80 --> 1931.56] Swagger
[1931.56 --> 1932.86] evolves over
[1932.86 --> 1933.46] time when it
[1933.46 --> 1934.14] degrades or,
[1934.34 --> 1934.52] you know.
[1935.92 --> 1936.80] Or whether it
[1936.80 --> 1937.38] takes over the
[1937.38 --> 1938.00] world and starts
[1938.00 --> 1938.66] launching with
[1938.66 --> 1939.40] your warheads.
[1940.36 --> 1941.14] I have a
[1941.14 --> 1941.94] question for
[1941.94 --> 1942.46] Rafael.
[1943.38 --> 1944.26] The views
[1944.26 --> 1945.66] aspect or
[1945.66 --> 1946.78] feature of
[1946.78 --> 1947.12] Goa,
[1947.16 --> 1947.54] I thought it
[1947.54 --> 1948.06] was super
[1948.06 --> 1948.46] interesting.
[1948.70 --> 1949.06] I remember
[1949.06 --> 1949.64] working with
[1949.64 --> 1950.34] a Rails app,
[1950.54 --> 1951.02] an API,
[1951.66 --> 1952.82] that was
[1952.82 --> 1953.40] serving
[1953.40 --> 1954.40] cube data
[1954.40 --> 1957.32] as restful
[1957.32 --> 1958.30] resources and
[1958.30 --> 1959.08] we had to
[1959.08 --> 1959.76] do some
[1959.76 --> 1962.12] filters that
[1962.12 --> 1963.34] were complicated.
[1963.56 --> 1964.08] Once I figured
[1964.08 --> 1965.16] out a pattern,
[1965.46 --> 1965.74] it was,
[1966.66 --> 1967.48] we just followed
[1967.48 --> 1967.86] the pattern.
[1967.98 --> 1968.50] It was sort
[1968.50 --> 1969.00] of simple.
[1969.30 --> 1969.82] But then I
[1969.82 --> 1970.42] ended up running
[1970.42 --> 1971.48] with problems
[1971.48 --> 1972.16] because we were
[1972.16 --> 1973.00] using the
[1973.00 --> 1973.64] Swagger
[1973.64 --> 1974.88] documentation
[1974.88 --> 1975.54] tool.
[1975.96 --> 1976.22] Swagger
[1976.22 --> 1976.78] as a
[1976.78 --> 1977.18] documentation
[1977.18 --> 1977.68] tool,
[1978.24 --> 1978.80] not necessarily
[1978.80 --> 1980.42] to design
[1980.42 --> 1980.84] the API,
[1980.92 --> 1981.32] but just to
[1981.32 --> 1981.84] document the
[1981.84 --> 1982.16] API.
[1983.02 --> 1983.90] And so
[1983.90 --> 1984.82] there was a
[1984.82 --> 1985.46] mismatch