Datasets:
willtheorangeguy
/
2017-WAN-Show-Transcripts

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
text
stringlengths
11
441
[637.46 --> 637.66] Okay.
[637.72 --> 637.88] Sure.
[638.06 --> 638.24] Okay.
[638.48 --> 638.80] All right.
[639.94 --> 640.26] AMD.
[641.38 --> 641.74] Oh.
[641.80 --> 641.98] What?
[643.28 --> 643.68] Oh.
[643.82 --> 644.00] Oh.
[644.00 --> 644.92] Did we move the.
[645.00 --> 647.78] We moved the HDMI doodads around.
[647.90 --> 648.22] Hold on.
[648.32 --> 648.42] What?
[648.58 --> 649.20] I'll be right back.
[649.82 --> 650.20] Okay.
[650.56 --> 651.50] Should I talk about it?
[651.50 --> 651.66] Yeah.
[651.66 --> 651.82] Yeah.
[651.82 --> 654.92] AMD will be introducing stuff called Threadripper.
[655.08 --> 656.00] Ryzen Threadripper.
[656.18 --> 656.20] The.
[656.44 --> 656.92] They're.
[657.08 --> 657.32] AMD.
[657.80 --> 658.32] Sorry.
[658.78 --> 661.28] They'll have 16 cores and 32 threads.
[661.54 --> 662.82] That's why they're called the Threadripper.
[663.00 --> 664.88] Which is just absolutely ridiculous.
[665.46 --> 667.12] I believe there's a couple different.
[667.40 --> 667.66] Yeah.
[667.76 --> 670.64] There will be up to nine different Threadrippers.
[671.28 --> 672.40] These are rumors.
[672.40 --> 678.04] The 1998 X and 1998 with 16 cores.
[678.22 --> 681.32] The 1977 X and 1977 with 14 cores.
[681.32 --> 688.28] 1976 X and 1956 X and 1956 all have 12 cores.
[688.52 --> 693.02] And then the 1955 X and 1955 with 10 cores.
[693.34 --> 695.36] Why are they making this so complicated?
[695.88 --> 697.12] It's a little messy.
[697.60 --> 697.84] Okay.
[697.88 --> 698.78] It's really messy.
[699.26 --> 706.52] But having it be AM4 and being able to get 16 cores is pretty sick.
[707.24 --> 709.28] So this is all.
[709.66 --> 710.32] This is all.
[710.32 --> 713.06] Oh, so these are claims from WCCF tech.
[713.14 --> 713.94] Just to be clear.
[714.90 --> 715.32] Wait.
[715.44 --> 715.90] Hold on.
[716.38 --> 722.12] And they're also saying that these Threadripper CPUs won't be compatible with the AM4 socket.
[722.28 --> 725.06] Which supports 1331 pins.
[725.62 --> 729.42] But will demand a massive 4094 pin socket.
[729.42 --> 730.44] Does it have a picture of it?
[730.44 --> 732.12] Was that the Epic thing that he was holding?
[732.12 --> 732.66] That was Epic.
[733.22 --> 734.88] Although it wouldn't surprise me.
[734.88 --> 734.98] No.
[735.76 --> 743.48] It wouldn't surprise me if Threadripper will look the same as Epic and fit in the same socket.
[743.48 --> 746.94] So much like what Intel does with their high-end desktop.
[746.94 --> 749.60] So their 2011 V3s.
[749.60 --> 754.30] And their Xeon platform, which also fits in socket 2011 V3.
[754.30 --> 765.36] I'm expecting AMD to have their Epic line of server chips and their Threadripper line of high-end desktop and or workstation chips exist on the same socket.
[765.48 --> 767.78] So that will allow them to have more PCIe lanes.
[768.22 --> 770.84] More pins for interfacing with more cores.
[770.84 --> 774.36] Up to, I believe it is, 6-channel memory?
[775.92 --> 776.76] I'll try to find that.
[776.80 --> 779.06] I read that wrong and thought it was on a different socket.
[779.20 --> 779.60] Sorry, guys.
[781.14 --> 781.54] 6.
[781.70 --> 782.66] I can't remember.
[782.74 --> 785.06] Is there 8-channel memory or something stupid like that?
[785.08 --> 785.60] I can't remember.
[785.68 --> 788.02] I think it's 8-channel memory, actually, now that I think about it.
[789.68 --> 793.02] And then the other thing is that...
[793.02 --> 793.52] Okay.
[794.60 --> 800.52] So what's interesting about this to me is that the way that Intel differentiates their Xeon processors on LGTX,
[800.84 --> 807.70] LGA20113, and their Core i7 processors on LGA20113 is a couple of things.
[807.76 --> 810.24] And the main ones are dual socket support.
[810.76 --> 815.88] So I would expect that that will continue to be a differentiator for AMD.
[816.32 --> 823.90] But the other thing that Intel does to keep them separate from each other is support for ECC-registered memory on Xeon.
[824.04 --> 825.66] 16-channel DDR4 memory.
[825.88 --> 826.92] 16-channel?
[826.92 --> 830.92] I think that's 16-channel is to the dual...
[832.98 --> 834.28] Wait, 16-channel?
[834.40 --> 834.60] Wow.
[834.76 --> 835.00] Okay.
[835.14 --> 837.42] Well, maybe Twitch chat is correcting me on that.
[837.42 --> 837.84] Oh, no.
[837.84 --> 838.42] That's the Epic.
[838.42 --> 839.16] So that's the Epic.
[839.34 --> 841.78] So if you want 32 dims.
[844.18 --> 844.98] So, yeah.
[845.84 --> 847.92] But if the Epic is on the same platform...
[847.92 --> 852.56] I guess that could be another way that they differentiate them.
[852.88 --> 853.12] Right.
[854.26 --> 854.92] So, yeah.
[855.00 --> 855.58] So rumor.
[855.82 --> 857.76] Rumor there will be up to nine Threadrippers.
[857.92 --> 858.58] I really...
[858.58 --> 862.64] I kind of hope they just call them Ryzen 9 to make life a little bit easier.
[863.12 --> 868.88] And I really am not sure what I think of these convoluted kind of names for them.
[868.88 --> 872.30] The 1998 X and 1998.
[874.72 --> 876.00] Tell me this.