Datasets:
willtheorangeguy
/
2017-WAN-Show-Transcripts

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
text
stringlengths
11
441
[2237.02 --> 2237.54] Beyond that.
[2237.66 --> 2238.70] Don't worry about it.
[2238.90 --> 2240.90] 1.9 kilowatts of electricity.
[2241.60 --> 2242.56] Don't worry about it.
[2242.56 --> 2246.62] I could see them refining this to the point where they'll deploy it at like their theme
[2246.62 --> 2247.44] parks and stuff.
[2247.66 --> 2251.26] And if it actually, you know, would cause a problem, there'd be so many lawsuits.
[2251.38 --> 2253.74] So I feel like they would probably be pretty careful with it.
[2253.84 --> 2269.26] So you think in the interest of protecting themselves from lawsuits, bearing in mind, of course, that, you know, lawsuits didn't result in the tobacco industry having to pay for, you know, the entire world's lung cancer treatments.
[2269.26 --> 2273.30] Like, um, yes.
[2274.20 --> 2279.70] With that in mind, do you think Disney is exposing themselves any more than, let's say, tobacco?
[2280.50 --> 2281.62] Big tobacco did.
[2282.02 --> 2282.24] Wow.
[2282.30 --> 2283.68] It's like a law school exam question.
[2283.68 --> 2287.70] Um, so what's your actual question?
[2287.80 --> 2287.90] Okay.
[2287.90 --> 2288.00] Okay.
[2288.12 --> 2288.92] So you said.
[2289.12 --> 2289.64] Flesh it out a little bit more.
[2289.70 --> 2289.82] Sure.
[2289.92 --> 2290.44] I'll flesh it out.
[2290.70 --> 2304.20] So your, you say Disney would research it fully to avoid exposing themselves to potential lawsuits because people are walking around in their park and getting, you know, ass cancer.
[2304.34 --> 2304.54] Yeah.
[2304.54 --> 2306.18] Or whatever the case may be.
[2306.28 --> 2312.38] I like how that's now the second, like, butt anatomy reference we've already made on Wancho.
[2312.46 --> 2313.48] Oh, I can do more than that.
[2313.56 --> 2314.24] Oh, I know.
[2314.38 --> 2314.72] I know.
[2314.92 --> 2316.28] You should see how many I can fit in there.
[2316.72 --> 2318.36] I work with this guy 40 hours a week.
[2318.46 --> 2319.40] So there you go.
[2319.52 --> 2319.72] Anyway.
[2319.72 --> 2319.82] Anyway.
[2323.62 --> 2324.26] Sorry.
[2326.12 --> 2326.76] Okay.
[2326.76 --> 2336.98] But what I'm asking is, are they really exposing themselves any more than previous, what's it called?
[2337.06 --> 2337.44] Precedent.
[2337.64 --> 2343.80] Like, then we already have precedent for these companies not ultimately ending up being responsible for giving people cancer.
[2344.16 --> 2348.86] I mean, okay, if they get to the point where, okay, we know this is safe.
[2348.86 --> 2355.24] And the reason I even bring that out in the first place is because, oh, you know, if you go into, like, Disney World or something, they give you the little, they call them magic bands.
[2355.30 --> 2355.90] You wear them here.
[2356.04 --> 2357.46] It's got, like, an RF chip in it.
[2357.56 --> 2365.30] And they're like, oh, you don't even have to carry your wallet around with you unless you want to buy alcohol or something because you can just do, you tap into everything and it works, right?
[2365.42 --> 2365.62] Right.
[2365.84 --> 2375.28] So I can see them deploying wireless power in, like, let's say, a theme park to do something with those or to make their rides cooler so they don't have to run wires or something like that.
[2375.28 --> 2384.74] But regardless of what they use it for, if they're going to do something like that, you know, if there's a real danger, they would obviously have to, like, disclose it.
[2384.80 --> 2389.50] And they wouldn't do that because if they say, oh, by the way, if you walk into our parks, we're testing this new thing out.
[2389.62 --> 2394.78] It's probably going to be pretty cool, but you also might get ball sack cancer or something.
[2394.82 --> 2395.54] And that would be very bad.
[2395.54 --> 2400.66] So even if they warn people, everyone's just going to be like, yeah, let's not go there.
[2400.66 --> 2406.88] So, you know, I can't see them using this in, like, a very, you know, risky manner.
[2407.12 --> 2407.36] Okay.
[2407.52 --> 2418.90] So the basic argument being made here is that consumers were complicit in giving themselves cancer because by the time the dangers had been proven, there was a warning label on the box.
[2419.50 --> 2422.10] And they're ultimately buying cancer, so that's their problem.
[2422.10 --> 2434.76] Whereas if they walk into a theme park with the assumption that there's magic cell phone charging, not realizing that there's any danger, that Disney would be exposing themselves if they hadn't done appropriate due diligence at the very least.
[2434.76 --> 2440.28] Yeah, it's called assumption of the risk, and it varies really wildly depending on exactly what situation you're talking about.
[2440.38 --> 2445.58] I'm actually not down on my history because, you know, I was born in 87, and I'm not sure exactly.
[2445.58 --> 2452.50] I'm not a smoker, so I don't know exactly when they started putting the warnings in all the cigarette boxes that said, you know, this might kill you.
[2452.80 --> 2461.38] It was like how, you know, when they first invented Coca-Cola, they had cocaine in it back in, like, the 1910s or something, and they had no idea, like, how bad cocaine was for people.
[2461.66 --> 2475.56] So I'm not exactly sure about that, but, like, at the same time, I think there is, you know, the average reasonable person, as we say in law, you know, if they walk into Disney World because they want to go meet Mickey Mouse and ride Space Mouse,
[2475.58 --> 2478.94] you know, I think there's a reasonable expectation that that will not give me cancer.
[2480.28 --> 2480.68] Right?
[2481.48 --> 2482.16] There you go.
[2482.54 --> 2483.76] Special cancer Mickey.
[2484.04 --> 2490.70] Yeah, as opposed to inhaling smoke and lighting things on fire and inhaling smoke, which I think is just obviously inherently more dangerous.
[2491.08 --> 2492.02] Than meeting Mickey.
[2492.16 --> 2493.28] Unless you have, like, a...
[2493.28 --> 2494.36] Depending where you're meeting Mickey.
[2494.46 --> 2499.58] Unless you have, like, a crippling psychological fear of, like, furries or something.
[2499.58 --> 2505.48] If you're meeting Mickey in the back alley, that's probably inherently as dangerous as inhaling burning plants.
[2505.48 --> 2507.84] That's really not safe.
[2508.02 --> 2511.30] No meeting Mickey in the alleyways off of International Drive in Orlando.
[2511.46 --> 2512.30] Please do not do that.
[2512.68 --> 2513.36] Probably a good idea.
[2513.50 --> 2515.46] So the original article here is from Kotaku.
[2515.92 --> 2521.66] The Switch will not have a virtual console at launch.
[2522.04 --> 2523.72] And this is a statement from Nintendo.
[2524.12 --> 2528.14] Virtual console games will not be available on Nintendo Switch at launch.
[2528.14 --> 2530.42] We will share more information in the future.
[2531.36 --> 2539.48] So virtual console, for those of you not familiar, is Nintendo's emulation service, which allows the Switch to play games from the NES up through the GameCube.
[2539.98 --> 2543.52] It will likely become a major part...
[2543.52 --> 2545.58] Here's the original article here from...
[2545.58 --> 2546.10] Where is it from again?
[2546.10 --> 2546.42] Kotaku.
[2546.42 --> 2546.78] Kotaku, right.
[2547.24 --> 2554.86] It will likely become a major part of the console's new paid-for online subscription, which will offer NES and SNES games each month.
[2554.86 --> 2566.24] The delay in virtual console support likely means we'll also be waiting longer for Nintendo's plans on whether discounts will be offered on games previously bought for other platforms.
[2566.54 --> 2569.44] So this is kind of a bummer in a wide variety of different ways.
[2569.94 --> 2579.02] So NES and SNES games each month, does this mean they'll have a rotating selection of titles and they'll only be available for so long, and then after that you can't play anymore?
[2579.14 --> 2579.90] Or am I understanding that?
[2579.90 --> 2583.04] I hate to say this, but I don't know.
[2583.28 --> 2587.60] I think we've discussed this previously, and Luke knows the answer, but I'm sorry, I don't remember.
[2587.70 --> 2589.88] I'm sure Twitch chat is going to pipe up and let you know anyway.
[2590.02 --> 2590.52] I'll keep an eye on it.
[2591.00 --> 2593.10] Basically, I understand what's going on here.
[2593.72 --> 2602.66] This is an entirely new architecture, so it's not like Nintendo could just be like, oh, well, let's just take the emulation software we were already using and let's just run it on the Switch.
[2603.28 --> 2604.14] Not that simple.
[2604.42 --> 2606.50] This is a completely new device.
[2606.50 --> 2625.96] So I get what happened there, but it's like super balls because Nintendo is doing their thing where, like, I don't even know why it made headlines that Nintendo was allowing you to carry virtual console purchases forward from Wii to Wii U.
[2625.96 --> 2640.84] I mean, it half made headlines because of the ass-backwards way that they did it, where you, like, had to deactivate your Wii and then put it on your Wii U instead of just having it be account-based.