Datasets:
willtheorangeguy
/
2017-WAN-Show-Transcripts

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
text
stringlengths
11
441
[1573.44 --> 1573.52] Broadwell E, yes.
[1573.52 --> 1573.84] Broadwell E.
[1573.92 --> 1578.62] So in that case, again, so we have to be really careful when we compare to the 7700K,
[1578.90 --> 1584.54] which has a much higher clock speed and will therefore deliver better performance in some applications
[1584.54 --> 1589.42] that are really clock speed or like individual core performance dependent like some games.
[1589.64 --> 1591.24] So we've got to be careful about that comparison.
[1591.24 --> 1599.44] We can't say the 1700 is hands down better, even if it absolutely spanks it in content creation benchmarks, for example.
[1599.68 --> 1606.50] And then we have to be really careful, again, saying, okay, the 1800X is equivalent to a 6900K.
[1606.96 --> 1613.10] Because like John was saying, if you have, if heavy expansion is a priority for your system.
[1613.12 --> 1614.08] Then they're not going to be equivalent.
[1614.22 --> 1614.94] Then they're not equivalent.
[1615.06 --> 1618.02] Because 24 PCIe lanes is not 40 PCIe lanes.
[1618.10 --> 1620.08] 24 is clearly a lower number than 40.
[1620.08 --> 1620.44] Yes.
[1620.74 --> 1623.36] So AMD made a bet here.
[1623.64 --> 1634.04] They put down their bet and they kind of went, we think that instead of taking Intel on head-on in the high-end desktop,
[1634.42 --> 1639.90] so that's the architecture E, so HEDT is the 40 core platform, LGA 2011.
[1639.90 --> 1654.28] And rather than taking Intel on head-on on their mainstream platform, we're going to go, we think consumers, enthusiast consumers, and consumers in general, want something kind of in between.
[1654.50 --> 1657.78] Because it would have been more expensive to have more PCIe lanes.
[1658.16 --> 1662.08] It would have been more expensive to have triple or quad-channel memory.
[1662.20 --> 1663.56] AMD went dual-channel memory.
[1663.56 --> 1669.76] But they did spend a little more than Intel because they went and they threw more cores at the problem.
[1669.88 --> 1672.98] So there's a more complex interconnect at play, obviously, here.
[1673.52 --> 1675.80] So that was the bet that AMD made.
[1676.16 --> 1682.78] And there are, I mean, you know, this is not a sales pitch for running out and buying a Kaby Lake processor, to be very clear.
[1683.10 --> 1685.48] But there are other exclusive things on Intel as well.
[1685.66 --> 1687.20] For example, Netflix at 4K.
[1687.20 --> 1690.94] Yeah, you have to have Kaby Lake or Neural whenever their new chips come out.
[1691.20 --> 1702.08] But, I mean, that's something that doesn't favor Intel necessarily even that much anyway because the high-end desktop, like the $1,000, $1,700 processor, they don't have that anyway.
[1702.28 --> 1702.58] No way.
[1703.12 --> 1704.88] So, okay.
[1705.00 --> 1706.86] Let's bring up the results of the straw poll here.
[1707.06 --> 1708.10] Actually, oh, you have to bring it up.
[1708.10 --> 1710.24] It's whoppingly, okay.
[1710.42 --> 1711.44] So here's what we're going to do.
[1711.44 --> 1718.96] I have to actually type in the straw poll address here, so bear with me for just a moment while Linus cackles at me.
[1718.96 --> 1721.24] I don't know what's wrong with my HDMI out.
[1721.42 --> 1722.20] I'm sorry.
[1722.36 --> 1723.08] One, two, four.
[1723.10 --> 1723.94] I'm sorry, everybody.
[1725.14 --> 1730.30] And I don't know why John doesn't get signed into his thing at some point here while we're talking.
[1730.62 --> 1732.72] I'm just trying to be expeditious.
[1732.82 --> 1733.22] I don't know.
[1734.40 --> 1734.84] Okay.
[1735.10 --> 1735.64] There we go.
[1735.84 --> 1736.04] Cool.
[1736.22 --> 1738.18] 91% say yes.
[1739.36 --> 1740.08] That's good.
[1740.08 --> 1751.96] I mean, okay, to be clear, this is not the stock market, and consumer sentiment does not dictate how things are going necessarily to that kind of a degree.
[1752.12 --> 1763.58] I mean, but this kind of confidence is great to see and really encouraging, which brings us then finally back to that article that we were going to bring up before.
[1763.90 --> 1769.38] Rumors are apparently already surfacing, and this is – I'm not trying to pick on AMD here.
[1769.38 --> 1778.02] This always happens, whether it's an errata or whether it's like, you know, some – oh, perfect example.
[1778.22 --> 1784.08] Like, what kind of thermal interface material is getting used between the die and the integrated heat spreader?
[1784.30 --> 1785.50] There's always some scandal.
[1785.60 --> 1789.16] Every CPU launch, green or red team, there's a scandal.
[1789.16 --> 1798.26] But it looks like Ryzen DDR4 memory might not be operating at the kinds of speeds that folks might have expected.
[1798.26 --> 1809.00] So long story short, apparently Ryzen is having some issues running four sticks of RAM, especially while running high speeds of RAM.
[1809.40 --> 1815.34] So it's recommended to only run RAM sticks at max of around 2400 megahertz if running with four sticks.
[1815.34 --> 1820.00] However, it is possible to run two sticks with a max speed of 3200 megahertz.
[1820.18 --> 1820.98] Mega – megahertz?
[1821.30 --> 1822.10] Megahertz.
[1822.80 --> 1831.68] Apparently this is all according to one forum post, though, and since we don't have a chip yet, we have absolutely no comments to make on this subject whatsoever,
[1832.10 --> 1835.60] other than to say, yeah, that doesn't really surprise me.
[1835.78 --> 1837.04] It may or may not be true.
[1837.04 --> 1844.18] If you're having problems with your brand new Ryzen rig, you might want to try turning down your memory speeds just in case.
[1844.48 --> 1845.24] So there you go.
[1845.36 --> 1847.26] Just see if that helps you out a little bit there.
[1848.42 --> 1849.02] All right.
[1850.40 --> 1851.68] We've got –
[1851.68 --> 1852.42] Disney's thing.
[1852.58 --> 1853.46] What's coming up next?
[1853.62 --> 1855.00] Oh, yeah, let's do Disney's thing.
[1855.00 --> 1858.64] We were going to talk about that, and then we ran into some slight problems.
[1859.30 --> 1859.86] All right.
[1859.94 --> 1864.46] So the original – this was posted on the forum by – let's just go find out.
[1864.80 --> 1865.18] Let's see.
[1865.28 --> 1866.18] I don't know.
[1866.30 --> 1866.82] I've got it here.
[1866.82 --> 1867.74] I still don't know.
[1868.66 --> 1869.78] By HeyYo.
[1870.80 --> 1871.16] Cool.
[1871.86 --> 1874.78] And the original article here is from Mashable.
[1874.92 --> 1875.82] Let's go ahead and pull that up for you guys.
[1875.82 --> 1877.90] Oh, I actually have it up from ours, but –
[1877.90 --> 1878.42] Oh, ours.
[1878.48 --> 1878.92] Okay, that's fine.
[1878.92 --> 1880.34] But it's basically the same thing.
[1880.42 --> 1881.30] I love ours, too.
[1882.42 --> 1888.16] Disney Research has achieved room scale, which is pretty freaking cool.
[1888.16 --> 1890.36] Oh, let me just say still.
[1890.48 --> 1890.86] There we go.
[1890.94 --> 1891.42] It looks like that.
[1891.64 --> 1895.34] Room scale ubiquitous wireless power delivery.
[1895.34 --> 1899.86] Now, to be very clear, wireless power delivery has been a thing for a long time.
[1899.86 --> 1910.40] But unless we go back to secrets that apparently died with Nikola Tesla, it's had some limitations.
[1910.40 --> 1914.42] So some of the ways that they can do wireless power are with magnets.
[1914.42 --> 1920.30] And that's where the induction charging that probably exists on your smartphone if you aren't an Apple user.
[1921.12 --> 1922.30] That's where that comes from.
[1923.04 --> 1923.26] Okay.
[1923.52 --> 1925.64] Or if you are an Apple user, it might exist on your watch.