text
stringlengths
14
502
[1869.34 --> 1870.80] I'm surprised
[1870.80 --> 1871.56] that all
[1871.56 --> 1872.14] those iPhones
[1872.14 --> 1873.50] have lower
[1873.50 --> 1874.28] pixel densities
[1874.28 --> 1874.72] than the
[1874.72 --> 1876.46] pixel 2 XL
[1876.46 --> 1876.76] even
[1876.76 --> 1877.98] the new
[1877.98 --> 1879.66] iPhone XS
[1879.66 --> 1880.12] has a lower
[1880.12 --> 1880.74] pixel density
[1880.74 --> 1881.04] than the
[1881.04 --> 1881.28] I mean
[1881.28 --> 1881.88] Apple
[1881.88 --> 1882.94] went straight
[1882.94 --> 1883.84] to retina
[1883.84 --> 1884.72] and then just
[1884.72 --> 1885.44] completely backed
[1885.44 --> 1885.64] off
[1885.64 --> 1886.10] they were like
[1886.10 --> 1886.36] yep
[1886.36 --> 1887.20] no this is
[1887.20 --> 1887.56] good enough
[1887.56 --> 1888.58] and frankly
[1888.58 --> 1889.10] I agree
[1889.10 --> 1889.60] with them
[1889.60 --> 1890.50] because you
[1890.50 --> 1891.18] can't tell
[1891.18 --> 1891.84] looking at an
[1891.84 --> 1892.62] iPhone XS
[1892.62 --> 1893.44] or XS max
[1893.44 --> 1894.60] that it
[1894.60 --> 1895.72] has lower
[1895.72 --> 1896.30] pixel density
[1896.30 --> 1896.90] than a Note 9
[1896.90 --> 1897.54] or an S9 plus
[1897.54 --> 1898.44] you cannot tell
[1898.44 --> 1898.88] well that's what
[1898.88 --> 1899.32] retina is
[1899.32 --> 1899.62] because that's
[1899.62 --> 1900.42] exactly the point
[1900.42 --> 1901.48] so then the
[1901.48 --> 1902.02] next tier is
[1902.02 --> 1902.68] under 400
[1902.68 --> 1903.46] pixels per inch
[1903.46 --> 1903.90] where you only
[1903.90 --> 1904.40] pay $10
[1904.40 --> 1905.52] in those
[1905.52 --> 1906.08] expensive
[1906.08 --> 1906.52] countries
[1906.52 --> 1907.00] and the
[1907.00 --> 1907.42] iPhone
[1907.42 --> 1908.92] XR
[1908.92 --> 1909.70] fits into
[1909.70 --> 1910.32] that category
[1910.32 --> 1911.08] but then
[1911.08 --> 1911.56] in some
[1911.56 --> 1912.16] other countries
[1912.16 --> 1912.86] where they're
[1912.86 --> 1913.56] not the
[1913.56 --> 1914.64] high paying
[1914.64 --> 1915.08] countries
[1915.08 --> 1915.70] the fee
[1915.70 --> 1915.96] can be
[1915.96 --> 1916.38] as little
[1916.38 --> 1917.78] as $2.50
[1917.78 --> 1919.54] per device
[1919.54 --> 1920.70] like a budget
[1920.70 --> 1921.28] phone in India
[1921.28 --> 1921.90] so I wonder
[1921.90 --> 1922.50] if this
[1922.50 --> 1923.34] really gives
[1923.34 --> 1923.90] us some
[1923.90 --> 1924.40] insight
[1924.40 --> 1925.34] into how
[1925.34 --> 1925.84] much
[1925.84 --> 1926.24] Google
[1926.24 --> 1926.98] expects
[1926.98 --> 1928.06] that
[1928.06 --> 1928.48] given
[1928.48 --> 1928.94] user
[1928.94 --> 1929.62] to contribute
[1929.62 --> 1930.26] directly to
[1930.26 --> 1930.64] their bottom
[1930.64 --> 1930.96] line
[1930.96 --> 1931.72] or if it's
[1931.72 --> 1932.18] just kind
[1932.18 --> 1932.34] of an
[1932.34 --> 1932.68] FU
[1932.68 --> 1933.10] and it's
[1933.10 --> 1933.34] the
[1933.34 --> 1934.12] and $250
[1934.12 --> 1934.94] is closer
[1934.94 --> 1935.20] to what
[1935.20 --> 1935.44] they would
[1935.44 --> 1935.88] expect to
[1935.88 --> 1936.12] make
[1936.12 --> 1936.82] no I
[1936.82 --> 1937.24] think that