text stringlengths 0 2.35k |
|---|
[701.70 --> 702.52] you come from Java. |
[702.66 --> 703.46] You probably don't know |
[703.46 --> 703.92] how to go. |
[704.66 --> 705.38] Never mind. |
[705.66 --> 706.64] Forget about it. |
[707.08 --> 708.52] This will take some time |
[708.52 --> 709.76] and it doesn't matter. |
[709.92 --> 710.96] They could have 20 years |
[710.96 --> 711.76] of experience |
[711.76 --> 713.92] and still look at them |
[713.92 --> 714.14] like, |
[714.54 --> 715.36] but do you know Go? |
[715.90 --> 716.32] Do you? |
[717.00 --> 717.44] So, |
[717.60 --> 718.48] that's where I am. |
[718.62 --> 719.68] I am curious though |
[719.68 --> 720.64] if we're getting any |
[720.64 --> 721.84] remarks from our listeners. |
[722.32 --> 722.54] So, |
[722.88 --> 723.58] maybe they have |
[723.58 --> 724.40] some opinions. |
[724.68 --> 725.58] Not just yet. |
[725.68 --> 726.32] Not just yet. |
[726.36 --> 727.70] But maybe any minute now. |
[727.90 --> 728.28] Hopefully. |
[728.74 --> 729.74] One can only hope. |
[730.78 --> 731.64] I'll be curious to hear |
[731.64 --> 732.94] what are some of the |
[732.94 --> 734.60] feedbacks that you got |
[734.60 --> 735.58] over the email. |
[735.76 --> 735.80] Like, |
[735.84 --> 736.70] what are the |
[736.70 --> 738.38] pros |
[738.38 --> 739.20] or the people |
[739.20 --> 740.26] who agreed or disagreed? |
[740.36 --> 741.18] You said that they were |
[741.18 --> 742.60] all backing their claims |
[742.60 --> 743.34] which is wonderful. |
[743.52 --> 744.42] It means you have |
[744.42 --> 745.34] generally a great |
[745.34 --> 746.44] discussion. |
[746.70 --> 746.98] Well, |
[747.10 --> 747.42] I mean, |
[747.60 --> 748.46] so there is |
[748.46 --> 749.50] expected practices. |
[749.64 --> 750.42] What was the term you used? |
[750.58 --> 751.16] Common practices. |
[751.86 --> 752.80] And that's great. |
[752.92 --> 753.02] So, |
[753.26 --> 753.78] tell us about them. |
[754.08 --> 754.22] Well, |
[754.26 --> 755.04] the first comment |
[755.04 --> 755.96] that I got was, |
[756.42 --> 757.50] that was really funny, |
[758.00 --> 758.22] was, |
[758.38 --> 759.28] aren't generics enough? |
[759.54 --> 760.34] OOP now? |
[760.52 --> 760.70] Really? |
[761.36 --> 762.28] Something like that. |
[763.32 --> 764.64] I thought that was hilarious. |
[765.40 --> 765.68] So, |
[765.90 --> 767.70] people do refer me a lot. |
[768.38 --> 770.04] to the Go FAQs |
[770.04 --> 771.38] that specifically say |
[771.38 --> 772.12] that the answer |
[772.12 --> 773.12] to whether Go |
[773.12 --> 774.30] is object-oriented |
[774.30 --> 774.90] or not |
[774.90 --> 776.66] is yes and no. |
[778.02 --> 778.92] And then, |
[779.28 --> 779.62] no, |
[779.70 --> 779.98] actually, |
[780.14 --> 781.28] is it a yes and no? |
[781.52 --> 781.76] Or, |
[781.92 --> 782.48] I don't remember. |
[782.82 --> 784.08] I actually prepared it for you. |
[784.16 --> 785.04] Let me read this out. |
[785.18 --> 785.72] Oh, amazing. |
[786.28 --> 786.94] Yes and no. |
[787.24 --> 788.36] Although Go has |
[788.36 --> 789.24] types and methods |
[789.24 --> 790.82] and allows an object-oriented |
[790.82 --> 791.78] style of programming, |
[792.06 --> 793.34] there is no type hierarchy. |
[793.92 --> 795.72] The concept of interface |
[795.72 --> 796.58] in Go provides |
[796.58 --> 797.62] a different approach |
[797.62 --> 798.40] that we believe |
[798.40 --> 799.42] is easy to use |
[799.42 --> 800.12] and in some ways |
[800.12 --> 800.72] more general. |
[801.48 --> 802.68] There are also ways |
[802.68 --> 803.68] to embed types |
[803.68 --> 804.48] in other types |
[804.48 --> 805.38] to provide something |
[805.38 --> 806.14] analogous |
[806.14 --> 807.08] but not identical |
[807.08 --> 808.56] to subclassic. |
[808.98 --> 809.54] Moreover, |
[810.06 --> 810.76] methods in Go |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.