text
stringlengths
0
2.35k
[1714.90 --> 1715.70] send it to you
[1715.70 --> 1716.94] and we can
[1716.94 --> 1717.58] include that.
[1718.06 --> 1719.56] So he criticized
[1719.56 --> 1720.54] object-oriented
[1720.54 --> 1721.24] for being
[1721.24 --> 1722.30] incredibly heavy,
[1722.92 --> 1723.38] I guess.
[1723.38 --> 1724.08] and that
[1724.08 --> 1724.80] sort of
[1724.80 --> 1725.60] works pretty
[1725.60 --> 1726.08] well with
[1726.08 --> 1726.78] those quotes
[1726.78 --> 1727.94] about objects
[1727.94 --> 1728.84] being lightweight
[1728.84 --> 1729.58] and go,
[1730.02 --> 1730.96] I think I agree.
[1731.46 --> 1731.98] I think it
[1731.98 --> 1732.60] feels very,
[1732.70 --> 1733.30] very natural.
[1733.72 --> 1734.14] By the way,
[1734.20 --> 1734.76] something that
[1734.76 --> 1735.72] I really love
[1735.72 --> 1737.42] is we don't
[1737.42 --> 1738.92] have enumerators,
[1739.12 --> 1739.62] but we do
[1739.62 --> 1740.12] have,
[1740.46 --> 1740.72] like,
[1741.18 --> 1742.36] it's very
[1742.36 --> 1743.40] easy for me
[1743.40 --> 1743.90] to,
[1744.36 --> 1744.82] when I look
[1744.82 --> 1745.70] at pseudocode
[1745.70 --> 1746.16] with those
[1746.16 --> 1746.84] red-black
[1746.84 --> 1748.72] trees and,
[1748.78 --> 1749.24] you know,
[1749.38 --> 1751.48] coloring nodes
[1751.48 --> 1752.06] in a graph
[1752.06 --> 1752.46] and stuff
[1752.46 --> 1752.94] like that.
[1753.28 --> 1753.76] This is
[1753.76 --> 1754.44] kind of stuff
[1754.44 --> 1755.12] that I teach
[1755.12 --> 1755.62] to people
[1755.62 --> 1756.24] who don't
[1756.24 --> 1756.90] have the,
[1757.80 --> 1758.18] let's say,
[1758.22 --> 1758.70] the classical
[1758.70 --> 1759.24] background
[1759.24 --> 1760.14] in the university
[1760.14 --> 1761.90] and I teach
[1761.90 --> 1762.52] that stuff
[1762.52 --> 1763.84] to people
[1763.84 --> 1764.46] because
[1764.46 --> 1766.14] they need
[1766.14 --> 1767.36] to pass
[1767.36 --> 1768.58] interviews.
[1769.30 --> 1769.48] So,
[1769.76 --> 1770.84] unfortunately,
[1771.46 --> 1773.04] this is where
[1773.04 --> 1773.60] this is coming
[1773.60 --> 1773.92] from.
[1774.28 --> 1774.76] But what I
[1774.76 --> 1775.58] really like
[1775.58 --> 1776.02] to do,
[1776.12 --> 1776.56] because I
[1776.56 --> 1777.30] don't,
[1777.74 --> 1778.30] I can't
[1778.30 --> 1778.88] code those,
[1779.20 --> 1779.86] so I take
[1779.86 --> 1780.56] pseudocode
[1780.56 --> 1781.54] with white,
[1781.76 --> 1782.20] black,
[1782.44 --> 1782.76] gray,
[1782.92 --> 1783.30] whatever,
[1783.58 --> 1784.40] red colors.
[1784.94 --> 1785.76] I define a
[1785.76 --> 1786.78] color that is,
[1787.24 --> 1787.48] that,
[1787.68 --> 1788.36] I don't define
[1788.36 --> 1788.90] a new type
[1788.90 --> 1789.46] of alias
[1789.46 --> 1789.98] integers
[1789.98 --> 1791.40] to do that
[1791.40 --> 1791.84] and I get
[1791.84 --> 1792.16] very,
[1792.30 --> 1793.06] very expressive
[1793.06 --> 1794.52] and basically
[1794.52 --> 1795.62] write pseudocode
[1795.62 --> 1795.98] and go.
[1796.76 --> 1797.76] And I don't
[1797.76 --> 1798.28] think that you
[1798.28 --> 1798.96] could do that
[1798.96 --> 1801.04] with a non-object
[1801.04 --> 1801.80] oriented language.
[1801.96 --> 1802.84] I can pretty
[1802.84 --> 1803.52] much express
[1803.52 --> 1804.44] any pseudocode
[1804.44 --> 1805.16] that I see