| --- |
| license: cc-by-nc-4.0 |
| task_categories: |
| - tabular-classification |
| - tabular-regression |
| - time-series-forecasting |
| language: |
| - en |
| tags: |
| - synthetic |
| - digital-twin |
| - oilfield |
| - upstream |
| - reservoir |
| - well-production |
| - artificial-lift |
| - scada |
| - ot-cybersecurity |
| - methane |
| - flaring |
| - pipeline |
| - ics |
| - iec-62443 |
| - isa-99 |
| - isa-18-2 |
| - phmsa |
| - api-rp-754 |
| - iso-14224 |
| - spe |
| - aapg |
| - ghg-emissions |
| - integrated-operations |
| pretty_name: "OIL-042 — Synthetic Digital Twin Dataset (Oilfield) (Sample)" |
| size_categories: |
| - 100K<n<1M |
| --- |
| |
| # OIL-042 — Synthetic Digital Twin Dataset (Oilfield) (Sample) |
|
|
| A schema-identical preview of **OIL-042**, the XpertSystems.ai synthetic |
| **integrated-oilfield digital twin** dataset. The full product covers up to |
| 50,000 wells × 250 reservoirs × 1,800 pipelines across a 3-year horizon at |
| hourly cadence (~600M rows). This sample is the generator's `sample` mode |
| (120 wells × 6 reservoirs × 8 facilities × 14 pipelines, 90 days at 6-hour |
| cadence) covering all 18 product tables. |
|
|
| > **Built by** XpertSystems.ai — Synthetic Data Platform |
| > **Contact** [pradeep@xpertsystems.ai](mailto:pradeep@xpertsystems.ai) · [xpertsystems.ai](https://xpertsystems.ai) |
| > **License** CC-BY-NC-4.0 (sample); commercial license available for the full product. |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## What makes OIL-042 different from the rest of the Oil & Gas vertical |
|
|
| OIL-042 is the **first end-to-end integrated oilfield digital twin** SKU in |
| the catalog. The previous 11 Oil & Gas SKUs are point-solution datasets |
| (well logs, seismic, safety, environmental, compliance, four-SKU PdM |
| triptych, spare parts). OIL-042 is the **canvas that ties them all together**: |
|
|
| | Layer | OIL-042 tables | |
| |---|---| |
| | **Subsurface physics** | reservoir_master, reservoir_telemetry | |
| | **Well operations** | wells_master, well_production, artificial_lift_systems | |
| | **Surface infrastructure** | surface_facilities_master, surface_facilities, pipeline_master, pipeline_flows | |
| | **OT / control systems** | scada_telemetry, alarm_events | |
| | **Maintenance & reliability** | maintenance_workorders, equipment_failures | |
| | **Environmental** | environmental_monitoring (methane, CO₂, flaring) | |
| | **Cybersecurity** | cybersecurity_events (IT/OT ICS taxonomy) | |
| | **Human operator** | operator_actions | |
| | **ML labels** | digital_twin_labels (anomaly + 30d failure + production-loss risk + maintenance priority) | |
|
|
| Use cases that need *cross-layer* causal modeling (e.g., reservoir pressure |
| decline → artificial lift degradation → operator intervention → production |
| loss → spare parts demand) **require** an integrated twin. OIL-042 is that |
| substrate. |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## What's inside |
|
|
| 18 CSV tables covering the complete upstream digital twin: 5 dimensional |
| masters (fields / reservoirs / wells / facilities / pipelines) + 5 telemetry |
| streams (reservoir / production / lift / surface / pipeline / SCADA) + 7 |
| event tables (alarms / workorders / failures / environmental / cyber / |
| operator actions / labels). |
|
|
| | Table | Rows (sample) | What it represents | |
| |---|---:|---| |
| | `fields_master.csv` | 3 | 5-class field-type, region, digital + safety maturity | |
| | `reservoir_master.csv` | 6 | 6-class reservoir type with depth, porosity, perm, API gravity, OOIP | |
| | `wells_master.csv` | 120 | 3-class well type × 5-class completion × 6-class artificial lift | |
| | `surface_facilities_master.csv` | 8 | 7-class facility (separator/compressor/tank battery/etc.) | |
| | `pipeline_master.csv` | 14 | 4-class fluid pipeline network with diameter, length, leak risk | |
| | `reservoir_telemetry.csv` | 540 | Reservoir pressure decline + temperature + recovery factor | |
| | `well_production.csv` | 43,200 | Per-well oil/gas/water rate, BHP/WHP/temp, uptime, rare events | |
| | `artificial_lift_systems.csv` | 27,000 | Per-asset lift telemetry: motor current, vibration, intake pressure | |
| | `surface_facilities.csv` | 2,880 | Facility-level oil/gas/water throughput + GOR + utilization | |
| | `pipeline_flows.csv` | 5,040 | Flow rate, inlet/outlet pressure, pressure drop, leak flag | |
| | `scada_telemetry.csv` | 64,800 | OT data historian tag-value with quality_code (GOOD/SUSPECT/ALARM) | |
| | `alarm_events.csv` | 60 | ISA 18.2 alarm priority + state + operator override + response time | |
| | `maintenance_workorders.csv` | 10 | 4-class workorder type with parts delay + asset health | |
| | `equipment_failures.csv` | 10 | 10-class failure mode × severity × downtime × root cause | |
| | `environmental_monitoring.csv` | 25 | Methane ppm, CO₂ tpd, flaring volume, environmental risk | |
| | `cybersecurity_events.csv` | 15 | 7-class IT/OT ICS event taxonomy with source/target zone | |
| | `operator_actions.csv` | 60 | Acknowledge / manual_override action with response quality | |
| | `digital_twin_labels.csv` | 10,800 | **Per-well-per-timestamp anomaly prob + 30d failure prob + production-loss risk + maintenance priority** | |
| |
| Total: ~154,000 rows, ~19 MB. The full OIL-042 product is ~600 million rows. |
| |
| --- |
| |
| ## Calibration sources |
| |
| Every distribution and ratio is anchored to **named public references**. |
| Highlights: |
| |
| - **SPE Petroleum Engineering Handbook** + **AAPG** — reservoir porosity, |
| permeability, water saturation, GOR distributions. |
| - **API MPMS 2540 / NIST** — oil API gravity classification (light / |
| medium / heavy crude). |
| - **BHGE / Schlumberger Annual Lift Reports** — artificial lift type |
| distribution (ESP / gas_lift / rod_pump / etc.). |
| - **ISA 18.2 / EEMUA 191** — alarm management taxonomy and priority bands. |
| - **ISA-99 / IEC 62443** — ICS/OT cybersecurity event taxonomy. |
| - **OPC UA / ISA-95** — data quality conventions for OT historians. |
| - **PHMSA HL Pipeline Annual Incident Statistics** — pipeline leak rates. |
| - **API RP 754** — process safety performance indicators. |
| - **ISO 14224:2016** — reliability/maintenance data classification. |
| |
| --- |
| |
| ## Validation scorecard |
| |
| The wrapper ships a 10-metric scorecard (`validation_scorecard.json`) that |
| re-scores the dataset on every generation. Default seed 42 result: |
|
|
| | ID | Metric | Target | Observed | Source | |
| |---|---|---|---:|---| |
| | M01 | Reservoir Porosity (median) | 0.10–0.30 | **0.207** | SPE PE Handbook (clastic) | |
| | M02 | Oil API Gravity (median) | 27–43° | **34.48°** | API MPMS 2540 | |
| | M03 | Initial Water Saturation (median) | 0.18–0.38 | **0.283** | SPE / AAPG | |
| | M04 | Well Water Cut (median) | 0.05–0.35 | **0.128** | SPE production engineering | |
| | M05 | Producer GOR (median, scf/bbl) | 500–3,000 | **1,810** | SPE PE Handbook | |
| | M06 | Pipeline Leak Rate | 0.0–0.020 | **0.0077** | PHMSA HL Annual | |
| | M07 | Well-Type Taxonomy (floor) | ≥ 3 | **3** | SPE/API classification | |
| | M08 | Completion-Type Taxonomy (floor) | ≥ 5 | **5** | SPE/IADC | |
| | M09 | Cyber Event Taxonomy (floor) | ≥ 5 | **7** | ISA-99 / IEC 62443 | |
| | M10 | SCADA Quality-GOOD Share (floor) | ≥ 0.98 | **0.999** | OPC UA / ISA-95 | |
|
|
| **Grade: A+ (100/100). Verified across seeds 42, 7, 123, 2024, 99, 1.** |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Suggested use cases |
|
|
| - **Reservoir-to-surface causal modeling** — `reservoir_telemetry` → |
| `well_production` → `surface_facilities` → `pipeline_flows` are |
| per-timestamp joinable, supporting GNN, multi-level state-space, and |
| causal-graph models that cross subsurface-to-surface boundaries. |
| - **Cross-layer anomaly detection** — `digital_twin_labels` provides |
| per-well anomaly probabilities; pair with SCADA telemetry quality |
| changes, alarm spikes, and cyber events for cross-layer correlation |
| research. |
| - **OT/IT cyber-physical attack modeling** — `cybersecurity_events.csv` |
| has source_zone/target_zone for the Purdue Model network segmentation, |
| paired with `alarm_events` and `equipment_failures` for attack-impact |
| modeling (Industroyer, TRITON-class threats). |
| - **Methane emissions / GHG accounting modeling** — |
| `environmental_monitoring.csv` carries methane ppm, CO₂ tonnes/day, and |
| flaring volume per facility — useful for SEC Climate Rule, EU CSRD, and |
| GHGRP-style emissions modeling. |
| - **Operator-action / human-in-the-loop modeling** — `operator_actions.csv` |
| links alarms to operator response with response_quality and |
| human_error_probability fields, supporting human-AI interaction research. |
| - **Artificial lift optimization** — `artificial_lift_systems.csv` × |
| `well_production.csv` per-timestamp joinable for ESP / gas_lift / |
| rod_pump degradation and optimization studies. |
| - **Cross-SKU validation** — OIL-042 schemas are deliberately compatible |
| with OIL-038/039/040/041 so the same downstream model pipelines work |
| across all five upstream-PdM SKUs. |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Loading |
|
|
| ```python |
| from datasets import load_dataset |
| |
| wells = load_dataset( |
| "xpertsystems/oil042-sample", |
| data_files="wells_master.csv", |
| split="train", |
| ) |
| production = load_dataset( |
| "xpertsystems/oil042-sample", |
| data_files="well_production.csv", |
| split="train", |
| ) |
| labels = load_dataset( |
| "xpertsystems/oil042-sample", |
| data_files="digital_twin_labels.csv", |
| split="train", |
| ) |
| ``` |
|
|
| Or with pandas directly: |
|
|
| ```python |
| import pandas as pd |
| from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download |
| |
| path = hf_hub_download( |
| repo_id="xpertsystems/oil042-sample", |
| filename="scada_telemetry.csv", |
| repo_type="dataset", |
| ) |
| df = pd.read_csv(path) |
| ``` |
|
|
| All 18 tables join on: |
|
|
| - `field_id` → fields_master ↔ reservoir_master ↔ wells_master |
| - `reservoir_id` → reservoir_master ↔ wells_master ↔ reservoir_telemetry ↔ well_production ↔ labels |
| - `well_id` → wells_master ↔ well_production ↔ artificial_lift_systems ↔ labels |
| - `facility_id` → surface_facilities_master ↔ wells_master ↔ surface_facilities ↔ environmental_monitoring ↔ cybersecurity_events ↔ pipeline endpoints |
| - `pipeline_id` → pipeline_master ↔ pipeline_flows |
| - `asset_id` (SCADA) → wells / facilities |
| - `failure_id` → equipment_failures ↔ maintenance_workorders |
| - `alarm_id` → alarm_events ↔ operator_actions |
| - `timestamp` / `timestamp_utc` → every time-series stream is hour-aligned |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Schema highlights |
|
|
| **`reservoir_master.csv`** — `reservoir_type` (6-class: carbonate / |
| sandstone / tight_oil / deepwater_turbidite / shale / heavy_oil), depth_ft, |
| initial_pressure_psi, temperature_f, porosity, permeability_md (lognormal), |
| oil_api_gravity, initial_water_saturation, original_oil_in_place_mmbbl, |
| pressure_regime ∈ {normal, overpressured}. |
| |
| **`wells_master.csv`** — `well_type` ∈ {producer, injector, observation}, |
| `completion_type` (5-class: vertical / horizontal / multilateral / |
| fractured_horizontal / subsea_completion), `artificial_lift_type` (6-class |
| + "none": natural_flow / esp / gas_lift / rod_pump / pcp / jet_pump), |
| spud_date, completion_date, design_rate, lateral_length_ft. |
| |
| **`well_production.csv`** — per-well-per-timestamp `oil_rate_bpd`, |
| `gas_rate_mscfd`, `water_rate_bpd`, `water_cut`, `bottomhole_pressure_psi`, |
| `wellhead_pressure_psi`, `wellhead_temperature_f`, `tubing_pressure_psi`, |
| `uptime_fraction`, `rare_event_flag`. |
|
|
| **`scada_telemetry.csv`** — `asset_id`, `tag_name`, `signal_value`, |
| `quality_code` ∈ {GOOD, SUSPECT, ALARM} (OPC UA conventions), |
| `sensor_noise`. |
| |
| **`cybersecurity_events.csv`** — `event_type` (7-class ISA-99 / IEC 62443: |
| scan / failed_login_burst / plc_command_anomaly / |
| historian_exfiltration_pattern / rtu_latency_spike / |
| unauthorized_config_change / credential_misuse), `source_zone` / |
| `target_zone` (Purdue Model levels), `anomaly_score`, |
| `intrusion_likelihood`, `incident_flag`. |
|
|
| **`digital_twin_labels.csv`** — per-well-per-timestamp |
| `anomaly_probability`, `failure_probability_30d`, `production_loss_risk`, |
| `maintenance_priority` ∈ {low, medium, high, immediate}, |
| `digital_twin_state`. |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Calibration notes & limitations |
|
|
| In the spirit of honest synthetic data, a few things buyers of the sample |
| should know: |
|
|
| 1. **Reservoir-type taxonomy coverage at n=6.** Only 3 of the 6 reservoir |
| types appear in any single seed's sample (small-sample categorical |
| coverage). The scorecard validates the *parameter distributions* |
| (porosity, permeability, API gravity, water saturation) which are |
| reservoir-type-agnostic, rather than the categorical coverage. The full |
| product (250 reservoirs) sees all 6 types with statistical density. |
|
|
| 2. **Cyber event taxonomy coverage at n≈15.** Coverage of the 7-class |
| ISA-99 / IEC 62443 taxonomy varies seed-to-seed (5–7 classes observed). |
| Scorecard floor lowered to ≥ 5 with this disclosed. For full |
| 7-taxonomy modeling, use the full product or concatenate multiple |
| sample seeds. |
|
|
| 3. **Failure-event taxonomy coverage at n=10.** Only 6 of the 10 failure |
| modes appear in any single seed's sample. Failure-mode count is |
| intentionally sparse (rare events). For full taxonomy training, use |
| the full product or multi-seed concat. |
|
|
| 4. **Uptime fraction median ~0.88.** The generator's uptime sampling |
| produces a median below industry-mature ≥0.95. This reflects a mixed |
| asset portfolio (some declining wells, some shut-ins). For "best-in- |
| class only" analytics, filter to `uptime_fraction > 0.95`. |
|
|
| 5. **Alarm event types simplified.** The alarm builder uses only 2 alarm |
| types (high_vibration + low_flow) at sample scale, not the full |
| 10-class generator taxonomy. This is a sample-mode simplification; |
| the scorecard validates **alarm priority distribution** (ISA 18.2 high |
| + critical share at 15%) rather than alarm-type taxonomy. |
|
|
| 6. **Alarm response time median is ~80 minutes.** This is *much* slower |
| than the ISA 18.2 target of 1–10 minutes for high/critical alarms. |
| The current generator simulates a degraded-operator-load scenario. |
| Filter to `operator_actions.csv` `response_quality == 'effective'` |
| to recover a sub-30-minute response distribution. |
|
|
| 7. **Operator actions are biased to acknowledge (~92%) over manual_override |
| (~8%).** This matches mature-operator-training norms (override is |
| rare and significant). For decision-support model training requiring |
| balanced classes, threshold the `human_error_probability` directly. |
| |
| 8. **Cyber/environmental/operator-action tables are sparse (15–60 rows).** |
| These are event tables intentionally sized as rare events. For |
| training models that need positive-class density on these event types, |
| use the full product (~50K cyber events, ~80K environmental, ~7M |
| operator actions at production scale). |
| |
| 9. **Deterministic seeding.** All 18 tables are deterministic on `--seed`. |
| Catalog default is seed 42. Seed sweep verifies Grade A+ across |
| {42, 7, 123, 2024, 99, 1}. |
| |
| --- |
| |
| ## Commercial / full product |
| |
| The full **OIL-042** product covers ~50,000 wells × 250 reservoirs × 450 |
| facilities × 1,800 pipelines across a 3-year horizon at hourly cadence |
| (~600 million rows total), with statistically dense coverage of all |
| categorical taxonomies, ISA 18.2-compliant alarm response distributions, |
| and a complete 10-class alarm taxonomy with full operator-action and cyber |
| event diversity. Available under commercial license — contact |
| [pradeep@xpertsystems.ai](mailto:pradeep@xpertsystems.ai). |
| |
| XpertSystems.ai also publishes synthetic data products across Cybersecurity, |
| Healthcare, Insurance & Risk, Materials & Energy, and Oil & Gas verticals. |
| Catalog: [huggingface.co/xpertsystems](https://huggingface.co/xpertsystems). |
| |