05 — Review Request
Request
I am requesting technical review of a pre-validation HIR/OAM runtime-governance prototype.
The review target is a runnable Python user-space runtime package that demonstrates HIR/OAM gate logic, GREEN/YELLOW/RED permission states, OAM hard-stop behavior, memory gating, CLI scenarios, test coverage, and audit-chain evidence.
What I am asking reviewers to evaluate
- Does the package run as described?
- Are the claims appropriately bounded?
- Are the HIR/OAM definitions clear and stable?
- Does the OAM hard-stop pattern make sense as a runtime-governance mechanism?
- Is the audit-chain evidence meaningful or too thin?
- Are the thresholds and gate states understandable?
- Where does this overlap with existing runtime governance work?
- What would be needed for independent replication?
- What should be removed, renamed, or tightened?
- What would a v0.2 implementation need before broader release?
What I am not asking reviewers to do
I am not asking for endorsement, institutional affiliation, clinical approval, medical validation, or confirmation of any consciousness/digital-life claim.
This is a systems-integrity and runtime-governance review request.