Spaces:
Running
Running
| title: OpenMark | |
| emoji: π― | |
| colorFrom: blue | |
| colorTo: purple | |
| sdk: static | |
| pinned: true | |
| short_description: "AI model benchmarking platform β 100+ models on YOUR tasks" | |
| tags: | |
| - benchmarking | |
| - llm | |
| - ai | |
| - model-evaluation | |
| # OpenMark β AI Model Benchmarking Platform | |
| **Stop trusting leaderboards. Benchmark your own work.** | |
| [OpenMark](https://openmark.ai) lets you benchmark 100+ AI models on your own tasks with deterministic scoring, stability metrics, and real API cost tracking. | |
| ## What Makes OpenMark Different | |
| - **Your tasks, not generic tests** β Write any evaluation task (code review, classification, creative writing, vision analysis) and test models against it | |
| - **Deterministic scoring** β Same prompt, same score, every time. No vibes-based evaluation | |
| - **Stability metrics** β See which models change their answer across runs (hint: many do) | |
| - **Real API costs** β Know exactly what each model costs per task, not just per million tokens | |
| - **100+ models** β OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral, xAI, and more. Side-by-side comparison | |
| ## Why It Matters | |
| Generic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, MATH) test models on tasks you'll never use. The only benchmark that matters is yours: does this model, with this prompt, for this task, give you the result you expect β reliably and affordably? | |
| ## Try It | |
| π **[openmark.ai](https://openmark.ai)** β Free to start. | |
| ## Links | |
| - π [Website](https://openmark.ai) | |
| - π [Why Generic Benchmarks Are Useless](https://dev.to/openmarkai/i-benchmarked-10-ai-models-on-reading-human-emotions-3m0b) | |
| - π¦ [Twitter/X](https://x.com/OpenMarkAI) | |
| - πΌ [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/openmark-ai) |