Spaces:
Running
Running
Oxygen-Only LoRA vs All-Task LoRA
Both runs use fold 0, ESM-2 t12, LoRA r=8, 1 epoch on Lambda A100 SXM4.
| Target | All-task LoRA | Oxygen-only LoRA | Baseline | Readout |
|---|---|---|---|---|
optimal_temperature_c MAE |
3.6660 | 32.2504 | 2.6743 | ignored by oxygen-only loss |
optimal_ph MAE |
0.5598 | 7.0462 | 0.4685 | ignored by oxygen-only loss |
salt_tolerance_pct MAE |
1.8154 | 2.0823 | 1.9171 | not improved by oxygen-only loss |
oxygen_requirement macro F1 |
0.9448 | 0.9168 | 0.4020 | oxygen-only worse than all-task |
Conclusion
Oxygen-only training did not beat the all-task LoRA run on the oxygen target: 0.9168 macro F1 vs 0.9448 macro F1. The all-task LoRA checkpoint remains the better fold-0 result. The oxygen-only checkpoint is saved locally for inspection but should stay out of git.
Artifacts
artifacts/lora/fold0_results_oxygen.jsonartifacts/lora/lambda_fold0_oxygen_1ep_20260517T103524Z.log- local-only checkpoint:
artifacts/lora/fold0_best_oxygen.pt