Spaces:
Running
Running
| # NegOptim — Use Cases and User Stories | |
| ## Use Cases for Manufacturers | |
| ### Use Case: Key Account Manager preparing for annual negotiations | |
| **Profile:** Account Manager at a consumer goods brand managing 5 major retail customers | |
| **Challenge:** Preparing for annual price increase negotiations with buyers who have access to detailed sales data the KAM doesn't have consolidated. | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Calculates Average Weighted Increase (AWI) automatically per customer | |
| - Simulates hundreds of scenarios at item and bulk level before the meeting | |
| - Provides a clear Price Waterfall showing off- and on-invoice details | |
| - Gives the KAM the same consolidated view as the buyer — or better | |
| **Outcome:** The KAM walks into negotiations informed, prepared, and focused on strategy rather than data preparation. | |
| --- | |
| ### Use Case: Category Manager tracking promotional ROI | |
| **Profile:** Category Manager at a CPG manufacturer managing seasonal promotions across 3 retail chains | |
| **Challenge:** Promotional budgets are consumed faster than anticipated, and ROI is only measured after the fact. | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Monitors promotion budgets throughout the cycle in real time | |
| - Tracks sell-in / sell-out calculations by brand and period | |
| - Verifies return on investment (ROI) per promotion | |
| - Enables budget adjustments before overspending occurs | |
| **Outcome:** Better budget control and real-time visibility over promotional investments. | |
| --- | |
| ### Use Case: CFO monitoring financial provisions | |
| **Profile:** Chief Financial Officer at a major FMCG company | |
| **Challenge:** Manual provision calculations are error-prone and lead to year-end disputes with retail customers over trade fund balances. | |
| **How NegOptim says it:** | |
| > "I benefit from comprehensive, detailed, and dependable financial performance reports." | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Automates provision calculations for all Trade, Digital, and Marketing funds | |
| - Ensures 100% of negotiated conditions are provisioned | |
| - Provides account ranking by financial objectives | |
| - Reduces disputes through systematic, traceable tracking | |
| **Outcome:** Clean year-end close with minimal disputes and full traceability. | |
| --- | |
| ### Use Case: Managing assortment distribution across channels | |
| **Profile:** Head of Category Management at a food manufacturer | |
| **Challenge:** Understanding actual distribution levels across hundreds of stores and simulating the impact of launching a new SKU. | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Visualizes WD (Weight Distribution) and ND (Numeric Distribution) down to SKU and circuit level | |
| - Simulates assortment movement impact on volume, revenue, and margin | |
| - Supports referencing decisions with data before committing to a launch | |
| **Outcome:** Manufacturers launch new products with confidence, backed by distribution impact simulations. | |
| --- | |
| ## Use Cases for Retailers | |
| ### Use Case: Purchasing Director preparing negotiation budgets | |
| **Profile:** Purchasing Director at a retail chain managing 200+ supplier negotiations per year | |
| **Challenge:** Consolidating negotiation budgets across all categories before the annual buying campaign begins. | |
| **How NegOptim says it:** | |
| > "Can we succeed in negotiations with scattered data, without rapid transitions from consolidated to detailed views?" | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Budget Maker provides a consolidated view of historical and forecasted KPIs by perimeter | |
| - Enables real-time adjustments and landing calculations as negotiations progress | |
| - Multi-cycle support manages Tariff 1, 2, 3, 4... without confusion | |
| **Outcome:** The purchasing team enters every negotiation fully prepared with a shared, consistent data foundation. | |
| --- | |
| ### Use Case: Buyer managing multi-supplier AWI declarations | |
| **Profile:** Buyer at a major hypermarket chain managing dozens of supplier tariff declarations | |
| **Challenge:** Suppliers send AWI increases via email. Tracking, verifying, and simulating counter-proposals is manual and time-consuming. | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Suppliers submit AWI declarations directly in the Collaborative Platform | |
| - Information automatically integrates into buyer tools | |
| - Buyers simulate counter-proposals based on raw material evolution data | |
| - Shared vision is built through structured dialogue, not email | |
| **Outcome:** Faster, more transparent AWI processing with fewer errors and a clear audit trail. | |
| --- | |
| ### Use Case: Legal Manager handling contract signing | |
| **Profile:** Legal Director at a retail group managing hundreds of annual supplier contracts | |
| **Challenge:** Contract preparation involves multiple rounds of back-and-forth by email, version control issues, and slow physical signing processes. | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Purchasers and Legal Directors prepare contracts collaboratively on the platform | |
| - Electronic signing directly within NegOptim | |
| - Contracts are generated from templates auto-populated with negotiated conditions | |
| - Amendments are tracked and version-controlled | |
| **Outcome:** Contract cycle time reduced significantly with full legal traceability. | |
| --- | |
| ### Use Case: Accounting Controller invoicing promotional conditions | |
| **Profile:** Accounting Controller at a retail group | |
| **Challenge:** Ensuring all negotiated promotional conditions are actually invoiced to suppliers, and managing credit notes and disputes. | |
| **How NegOptim says it:** | |
| > "100% of the negotiated conditions are effectively invoiced while reducing disputes." | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Provisions are calculated automatically | |
| - Mass invoice generation and sending directly from the platform | |
| - Proof management allows uploading evidence linked to contract conditions | |
| - Dispute risk is minimized through full traceability | |
| **Outcome:** Near-zero disputed invoices and complete fund recovery. | |
| --- | |
| ### Use Case: Market Manager running a product tender (RFP) | |
| **Profile:** Market Manager at a retail chain launching an RFP for a new product category | |
| **Challenge:** Managing RFP responses from 15 suppliers, scoring them consistently, and awarding markets while keeping all parties informed. | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Publishes customizable RFP response grids on the platform | |
| - Manages supplier responses, scoring, and selection in one place | |
| - Suppliers can propose innovations aligned with the referenced assortment | |
| - Markets are assigned and data synchronized automatically | |
| **Outcome:** A transparent, efficient tender process with no administrative overhead and a clear audit trail. | |
| --- | |
| ### Use Case: Category Manager optimizing store assortment | |
| **Profile:** Category Manager at a supermarket group managing fresh produce across 3 store formats | |
| **Challenge:** Building assortments that match each store cluster's positioning (discount, premium, standard) while integrating competitive benchmarks. | |
| **How NegOptim helps:** | |
| - Simulates and builds assortments by store type and cluster | |
| - Integrates external competitive benchmark data | |
| - Identifies target SKU counts by price zone and private label share | |
| - Simulates the profitability impact of price variations at SKU level | |
| **Outcome:** Differentiated, competitive assortments per store format — aligned with both commercial objectives and consumer positioning. | |