|
Download README.md from NeoteAI/n0_VTLA_insert_USB: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 1.93 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/NeoteAI/n0_VTLA_insert_USB/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://NeoteAI/n0_VTLA_insert_USB/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/NeoteAI/n0_VTLA_insert_USB/resolve/main/README.md
1.93 kB
| license: cc-by-sa-4.0 | |
| library_name: n0vtla | |
| tags: | |
| - robotics | |
| - vision-language-action | |
| - tactile | |
| - manipulation | |
| # N0-VTLA - NeoSim Plug USB | |
| Task policy for [N0-VTLA](https://github.com/neoteai/N0-VTLA), a vision-tactile-language-action | |
| model that conditions a flow-matching action expert on predicted latent tactile tokens. | |
| This is a **task policy, not a pretrained base**. For post-training on your own robot start from | |
| [n0-vtla-base](https://huggingface.co/NeoteAI/n0-vtla-base). | |
| | | | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | Config | `sim_single_arm_tactile` | | |
| | Tactile pathway | enabled, `n_latent=5`, views `(tactile_a, tactile_b)` | | |
| | Action space | 8-dim joint | | |
| Policy for the NeoSim `insert_USB` task. | |
| **80%**, first attempt. | |
| ### Serving | |
| ```bash | |
| VTLA_ASSET_ID=univtac_single4_joint_norm \ | |
| python scripts/serve_zmq.py --config sim_single_arm_tactile \ | |
| --ckpt <this-dir> --addr "tcp://127.0.0.1:5557" | |
| ``` | |
| `action_horizon` is 50; set `exec_horizon: 50`. Prompt: `insert USB` | |
| ## Evaluation protocol | |
| Measured on the UniVTAC simulator at commit `695a22d` | |
| (branch `NeoSim` of [anlorla/UniVTAC](https://github.com/anlorla/UniVTAC)), on held-out seeds | |
| starting at 100. Success criteria on three tasks were tightened after these numbers were | |
| measured, so a success rate on this benchmark is not comparable without the simulator commit | |
| beside it; see | |
| [docs/EVAL.md](https://github.com/neoteai/N0-VTLA/blob/main/docs/EVAL.md) for the details and for | |
| the full evaluation procedure. | |
| ## Caveat on the tactile pathway | |
| This checkpoint carries the tactile pathway, but this benchmark cannot demonstrate that touch | |
| contributes to the score. Object randomisation is +/-2-5 mm with no domain randomisation, so a | |
| policy that ignores its cameras and its tactile sensors entirely can still score well. Use | |
| `scripts/probe_z_tactile_dependence.py` to measure the causal contribution yourself. | |
| ## License | |
| CC BY-SA 4.0, as the parent repository. | |