Datasets:
Questions about the 256-channel tactile format (channel layout, bend sensors, baseline, contact)
Hi ACE-Data-0 team,
Thank you for releasing ACE-Data-0! We are working with the table-scale tactile subset (revision 490ef48), and we have a few questions about the 256-channel glove format used in Table-scale/Tactile/ACE-Data-Tactile-1 … ACE-Data-Tactile-10 (raw/tactile/{left,right}/take-*.parquet, columns pressure_0 … pressure_255 and contact).
- Channel layout / mapping to the hand-shaped grid
The paper (Sec. 4.2.4) mentions hand-shaped pressure grids remapped from the raw glove sensors, but we could not find the channel map in the release. Is it the same mapping as TouchAnything / EgoTouch (configs/pressure_position_mapping_{left,right}.json in the TouchAnything repo)?
For reference, here is what we observed:
All channels referenced by that mapping (138 left / 147 right) are active in ACE-Data-0, while the remaining channels carry only about 0.3% of the total signal.
Under that mapping, neighboring taxels are clearly correlated (mean r ≈ 0.38, vs ≈ 0.08 after shuffling the channel positions).
So it looks compatible, but we would like to confirm. If possible, could you share the official channel map, including finger assignment and orientation?
- Bend / flex sensors
The EgoTouch glove has dedicated bend sensors (3 per finger) in the same 256-channel array. Does your glove also have bend sensors, and if so, which channels are they?
In the bend-sensor region of the TouchAnything layout, only one channel per finger reads continuously non-zero, even without contact:
left: pressure_209 / 212 / 215 / 218 / 221
right: pressure_34 / 37 / 40 / 43 / 46
The other bend-region channels stay near zero. Are those other channels unconnected, or do they serve another purpose?
- Baseline correction and normalization
Many channels have non-zero offsets at rest. For example, on the left hand, the 5th percentile of the summed pressure-channel reading within 10-second windows stays above 100 counts in 456 of 494 takes.
The paper mentions calibrated normalization and baseline correction. Could you describe the procedure?
How is the baseline estimated: first frames, a rest period, per-take calibration, or a rolling baseline?
Is normalization global or per take/glove?
Is there any calibration to physical units?
Do you plan to release the processed pressure grids?
- The contact column
What does contact represent, and how is it computed (glove firmware, a threshold on the pressure channels, or something else)? We found it hard to relate to the pressure readings:
It is 1 in about 64% (left) / 40% (right) of samples.
It switches about 85 times per minute (median across takes).
On the left hand, after excluding bend-like channels, its agreement with “max pressure channel > threshold” is at most about 0.82 across thresholds 0–50. The mean max pressure is about 30 counts when contact=1, vs about 21 when contact=0.
Is this field intended to be used as a contact label?
Thanks a lot for your help, and for the great dataset!