message
stringlengths
2
59.7k
message_type
stringclasses
2 values
message_id
int64
0
1
conversation_id
int64
37
108k
cluster
float64
20
20
__index_level_0__
int64
74
217k
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Find the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Constraints * 2 \leq K \leq 10^5 * K is an integer. Input Input is given from Standard Input in the following format: K Output Print the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Examples Input 6 Output 3 Input 41 Output 5 Input 79992 Output 36
instruction
0
97,705
20
195,410
"Correct Solution: ``` from collections import deque K = int(input()) G = [[] for i in range(K)] for i in range(K): G[i].append(((10 * i) % K, 0)) G[i].append(((i + 1) % K, 1)) dist = [float('inf')] * K dist[1] = 1 que = deque() que.append(1) while que: n = que.pop() for v, c in G[n]: if dist[v] > dist[n] + c: dist[v] = dist[n] + c if c == 0: que.append(v) else: que.appendleft(v) print(dist[0]) ```
output
1
97,705
20
195,411
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Find the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Constraints * 2 \leq K \leq 10^5 * K is an integer. Input Input is given from Standard Input in the following format: K Output Print the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Examples Input 6 Output 3 Input 41 Output 5 Input 79992 Output 36
instruction
0
97,706
20
195,412
"Correct Solution: ``` from collections import deque def bfs01(K,adjlist): reached=[False]*K d=deque() d.append((1,0)) reached[1]=True while True: cur=d.popleft() reached[cur[0]]=True if cur[0]==0: return cur[1] for j,w in adjlist[cur[0]]: if w==0: if not reached[j]: d.appendleft((j,cur[1])) elif w==1: if not reached[j]: d.append((j,cur[1]+1)) K=int(input()) adjlist=[[] for _ in range(K)] for i in range(K): to1=(i+1)%K to2=(10*i)%K if to1==to2: adjlist[i]=[(to2,0)] else: adjlist[i]=[(to1,1),(to2,0)] print(bfs01(K,adjlist)+1) ```
output
1
97,706
20
195,413
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Find the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Constraints * 2 \leq K \leq 10^5 * K is an integer. Input Input is given from Standard Input in the following format: K Output Print the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Examples Input 6 Output 3 Input 41 Output 5 Input 79992 Output 36
instruction
0
97,707
20
195,414
"Correct Solution: ``` # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- import sys from heapq import heappush,heappop sys.setrecursionlimit(10**9) INF=10**18 MOD=10**9+7 def input(): return sys.stdin.readline().rstrip() def main(): def dijkstra(start,n,edges): d=[INF]*n used=[False]*n d[start]=0 used[start]=True edgelist=[] for edge in edges[start]: heappush(edgelist,edge) while edgelist: minedge=heappop(edgelist) if used[minedge[1]]: continue v=minedge[1] d[v]=minedge[0] used[v]=True for edge in edges[v]: if not used[edge[1]]: heappush(edgelist,(edge[0]+d[v],edge[1])) return d K=int(input()) edges=[[] for _ in range(K)] for i in range(K): edges[i].append((1,(i+1)%K)) edges[i].append((0,i*10%K)) d=dijkstra(1,K,edges) print(d[0]+1) if __name__ == '__main__': main() ```
output
1
97,707
20
195,415
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Find the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Constraints * 2 \leq K \leq 10^5 * K is an integer. Input Input is given from Standard Input in the following format: K Output Print the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Examples Input 6 Output 3 Input 41 Output 5 Input 79992 Output 36
instruction
0
97,708
20
195,416
"Correct Solution: ``` from collections import deque k = int(input()) d = [-1] * (k * 10) d[0] = 0 q = deque([0]) ans = 100000000 while q: p = q.pop() x, r = p // 10, p % 10 if r < 9: t = (x + 1) % k * 10 + r + 1 if t // 10 == 0: ans = min(ans, d[p] + 1) elif d[t] == -1: q.appendleft(t) d[t] = d[p] + 1 t = (x * 10) % k * 10 if d[p] != 0 and t // 10 == 0: ans = min(ans, d[p]) elif d[t] == -1: q.append(t) d[t] = d[p] print(ans) ```
output
1
97,708
20
195,417
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Find the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Constraints * 2 \leq K \leq 10^5 * K is an integer. Input Input is given from Standard Input in the following format: K Output Print the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Examples Input 6 Output 3 Input 41 Output 5 Input 79992 Output 36
instruction
0
97,709
20
195,418
"Correct Solution: ``` import sys # import math # import queue # import copy # import bisect#2ๅˆ†ๆŽข็ดข from collections import deque def input(): return sys.stdin.readline()[:-1] def inputi(): return int(input()) K=inputi() vals=[10**5+1]*K visit=[] vals[1]=0 q = deque([1]) flag=False while len(q)>0: s=q.popleft() vs=vals[s] if s==0: print(vs+1) flag=True break #visit.append(s) s0=(10*s)%K if vs<vals[s0]: vals[s0]=vs q.appendleft(s0) s1=(s+1)%K if vs+1<vals[s1]: vals[s1]=vs+1 q.append(s1) #print(q,s,s0,s1,vals) #if flag==False: # print(vals[0]+1) ```
output
1
97,709
20
195,419
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Find the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Constraints * 2 \leq K \leq 10^5 * K is an integer. Input Input is given from Standard Input in the following format: K Output Print the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Examples Input 6 Output 3 Input 41 Output 5 Input 79992 Output 36
instruction
0
97,710
20
195,420
"Correct Solution: ``` import sys from collections import deque sys.setrecursionlimit(10**7) k=int(input()) g=[[] for i in range(k)] for i in range(k): g[i].append(((i+1)%k,1)) if i: g[i].append((10*i%k,0)) dq=deque([1]) res=[float('inf')]*k res[1]=1 while dq: v=dq.popleft() if v==0: break for t,cost in g[v]: if res[t]<=res[v]+cost: continue res[t]=res[v]+cost if cost: dq.append(t) else: dq.appendleft(t) print(res[0]) ```
output
1
97,710
20
195,421
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Find the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Constraints * 2 \leq K \leq 10^5 * K is an integer. Input Input is given from Standard Input in the following format: K Output Print the smallest possible sum of the digits in the decimal notation of a positive multiple of K. Examples Input 6 Output 3 Input 41 Output 5 Input 79992 Output 36 Submitted Solution: ``` import sys def I(): return int(sys.stdin.readline().rstrip()) K = I() Graph = [0]*K for i in range(K): if (i+1) % K != (10*i) % K: Graph[i] = [(1,(i+1) % K),(0,(10*i) % K)] # 1ใ‚’ๅŠ ใˆใ‚‹,10ๅ€ใ™ใ‚‹ else: Graph[i] = [(0,(10*i) % K)] # dijkstra from heapq import heappush,heappop d = [100]*K d[1] = 1 q = [] heappush(q,(1,1)) v = [False]*K while q: a,n = heappop(q) if v[n]: continue v[n] = True for da,dn in Graph[n]: if v[dn]: continue if a+da < d[dn]: d[dn] = a+da heappush(q,(a+da,dn)) print(d[0]) ```
instruction
0
97,713
20
195,426
Yes
output
1
97,713
20
195,427
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Today's Random Number E869120 You ran a campaign called "Today's Random Numbers" for N days. This is a project to generate a random number once a day and post the value on Twitter. The "random numbers of the day" on day $ 1, 2, 3, \ dots, N $ were $ A_1, A_2, A_3, \ dots, A_N $, respectively. E869120 You would be happy if today's random number is higher than yesterday's random number. How many times in the $ N $ day did E869120 make you happy with "Today's Random Numbers"? input Input is given from standard input in the following format. $ N $ $ A_1 $ $ A_2 $ $ A_3 $ $ \ dots $ $ A_N $ output Print out the number of times E869120 was pleased with "Today's Random Numbers" in one line in $ N $ days. However, insert a line break at the end. Constraint * $ 1 \ leq N \ leq 100000 \ (= 10 ^ 5) $ * $ 1 \ leq A_i \ leq 1000000000 \ (= 10 ^ 9) $ * All inputs are integers. Input example 1 Five 8 6 9 1 20 Output example 1 2 On the 3rd and 5th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 2 6 3 3 4 3 3 4 Output example 2 2 On the 3rd and 6th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 3 Ten 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Output example 3 0 E869120 You will not be happy with "Today's Random Numbers". Example Input 5 8 6 9 1 20 Output 2
instruction
0
97,797
20
195,594
"Correct Solution: ``` input() l = list(map(int,input().split())) cnt = 0 for i in range(len(l)-1): if l[i]<l[i+1]: cnt+=1 print(cnt) ```
output
1
97,797
20
195,595
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Today's Random Number E869120 You ran a campaign called "Today's Random Numbers" for N days. This is a project to generate a random number once a day and post the value on Twitter. The "random numbers of the day" on day $ 1, 2, 3, \ dots, N $ were $ A_1, A_2, A_3, \ dots, A_N $, respectively. E869120 You would be happy if today's random number is higher than yesterday's random number. How many times in the $ N $ day did E869120 make you happy with "Today's Random Numbers"? input Input is given from standard input in the following format. $ N $ $ A_1 $ $ A_2 $ $ A_3 $ $ \ dots $ $ A_N $ output Print out the number of times E869120 was pleased with "Today's Random Numbers" in one line in $ N $ days. However, insert a line break at the end. Constraint * $ 1 \ leq N \ leq 100000 \ (= 10 ^ 5) $ * $ 1 \ leq A_i \ leq 1000000000 \ (= 10 ^ 9) $ * All inputs are integers. Input example 1 Five 8 6 9 1 20 Output example 1 2 On the 3rd and 5th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 2 6 3 3 4 3 3 4 Output example 2 2 On the 3rd and 6th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 3 Ten 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Output example 3 0 E869120 You will not be happy with "Today's Random Numbers". Example Input 5 8 6 9 1 20 Output 2
instruction
0
97,798
20
195,596
"Correct Solution: ``` from itertools import * from bisect import * from math import * from collections import * from heapq import * from random import * import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(10 ** 6) int1 = lambda x: int(x) - 1 p2D = lambda x: print(*x, sep="\n") def II(): return int(sys.stdin.readline()) def MI(): return map(int, sys.stdin.readline().split()) def MI1(): return map(int1, sys.stdin.readline().split()) def MF(): return map(float, sys.stdin.readline().split()) def LI(): return list(map(int, sys.stdin.readline().split())) def LI1(): return list(map(int1, sys.stdin.readline().split())) def LF(): return list(map(float, sys.stdin.readline().split())) def LLI(rows_number): return [LI() for _ in range(rows_number)] dij = [(1, 0), (0, 1), (-1, 0), (0, -1)] def main(): input() aa=LI() ans=0 for a0,a1 in zip(aa,aa[1:]): if a0<a1:ans+=1 print(ans) main() ```
output
1
97,798
20
195,597
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Today's Random Number E869120 You ran a campaign called "Today's Random Numbers" for N days. This is a project to generate a random number once a day and post the value on Twitter. The "random numbers of the day" on day $ 1, 2, 3, \ dots, N $ were $ A_1, A_2, A_3, \ dots, A_N $, respectively. E869120 You would be happy if today's random number is higher than yesterday's random number. How many times in the $ N $ day did E869120 make you happy with "Today's Random Numbers"? input Input is given from standard input in the following format. $ N $ $ A_1 $ $ A_2 $ $ A_3 $ $ \ dots $ $ A_N $ output Print out the number of times E869120 was pleased with "Today's Random Numbers" in one line in $ N $ days. However, insert a line break at the end. Constraint * $ 1 \ leq N \ leq 100000 \ (= 10 ^ 5) $ * $ 1 \ leq A_i \ leq 1000000000 \ (= 10 ^ 9) $ * All inputs are integers. Input example 1 Five 8 6 9 1 20 Output example 1 2 On the 3rd and 5th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 2 6 3 3 4 3 3 4 Output example 2 2 On the 3rd and 6th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 3 Ten 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Output example 3 0 E869120 You will not be happy with "Today's Random Numbers". Example Input 5 8 6 9 1 20 Output 2
instruction
0
97,799
20
195,598
"Correct Solution: ``` n = int(input()) a = list(map(int,input().split())) ans = 0 for i in range(1,n): if a[i-1] < a[i]: ans += 1 print(ans) ```
output
1
97,799
20
195,599
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Today's Random Number E869120 You ran a campaign called "Today's Random Numbers" for N days. This is a project to generate a random number once a day and post the value on Twitter. The "random numbers of the day" on day $ 1, 2, 3, \ dots, N $ were $ A_1, A_2, A_3, \ dots, A_N $, respectively. E869120 You would be happy if today's random number is higher than yesterday's random number. How many times in the $ N $ day did E869120 make you happy with "Today's Random Numbers"? input Input is given from standard input in the following format. $ N $ $ A_1 $ $ A_2 $ $ A_3 $ $ \ dots $ $ A_N $ output Print out the number of times E869120 was pleased with "Today's Random Numbers" in one line in $ N $ days. However, insert a line break at the end. Constraint * $ 1 \ leq N \ leq 100000 \ (= 10 ^ 5) $ * $ 1 \ leq A_i \ leq 1000000000 \ (= 10 ^ 9) $ * All inputs are integers. Input example 1 Five 8 6 9 1 20 Output example 1 2 On the 3rd and 5th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 2 6 3 3 4 3 3 4 Output example 2 2 On the 3rd and 6th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 3 Ten 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Output example 3 0 E869120 You will not be happy with "Today's Random Numbers". Example Input 5 8 6 9 1 20 Output 2
instruction
0
97,800
20
195,600
"Correct Solution: ``` n=int(input()) a=list(map(int,input().split())) ans = 0 for i in range(n-1): if a[i] < a[i + 1]: ans += 1 print(ans) ```
output
1
97,800
20
195,601
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Today's Random Number E869120 You ran a campaign called "Today's Random Numbers" for N days. This is a project to generate a random number once a day and post the value on Twitter. The "random numbers of the day" on day $ 1, 2, 3, \ dots, N $ were $ A_1, A_2, A_3, \ dots, A_N $, respectively. E869120 You would be happy if today's random number is higher than yesterday's random number. How many times in the $ N $ day did E869120 make you happy with "Today's Random Numbers"? input Input is given from standard input in the following format. $ N $ $ A_1 $ $ A_2 $ $ A_3 $ $ \ dots $ $ A_N $ output Print out the number of times E869120 was pleased with "Today's Random Numbers" in one line in $ N $ days. However, insert a line break at the end. Constraint * $ 1 \ leq N \ leq 100000 \ (= 10 ^ 5) $ * $ 1 \ leq A_i \ leq 1000000000 \ (= 10 ^ 9) $ * All inputs are integers. Input example 1 Five 8 6 9 1 20 Output example 1 2 On the 3rd and 5th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 2 6 3 3 4 3 3 4 Output example 2 2 On the 3rd and 6th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 3 Ten 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Output example 3 0 E869120 You will not be happy with "Today's Random Numbers". Example Input 5 8 6 9 1 20 Output 2
instruction
0
97,801
20
195,602
"Correct Solution: ``` n = int(input()) a = list(map(int,input().split())) count = 0 for i in range(1,n): if a[i-1] < a[i]: count += 1 print(count) ```
output
1
97,801
20
195,603
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Today's Random Number E869120 You ran a campaign called "Today's Random Numbers" for N days. This is a project to generate a random number once a day and post the value on Twitter. The "random numbers of the day" on day $ 1, 2, 3, \ dots, N $ were $ A_1, A_2, A_3, \ dots, A_N $, respectively. E869120 You would be happy if today's random number is higher than yesterday's random number. How many times in the $ N $ day did E869120 make you happy with "Today's Random Numbers"? input Input is given from standard input in the following format. $ N $ $ A_1 $ $ A_2 $ $ A_3 $ $ \ dots $ $ A_N $ output Print out the number of times E869120 was pleased with "Today's Random Numbers" in one line in $ N $ days. However, insert a line break at the end. Constraint * $ 1 \ leq N \ leq 100000 \ (= 10 ^ 5) $ * $ 1 \ leq A_i \ leq 1000000000 \ (= 10 ^ 9) $ * All inputs are integers. Input example 1 Five 8 6 9 1 20 Output example 1 2 On the 3rd and 5th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 2 6 3 3 4 3 3 4 Output example 2 2 On the 3rd and 6th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 3 Ten 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Output example 3 0 E869120 You will not be happy with "Today's Random Numbers". Example Input 5 8 6 9 1 20 Output 2
instruction
0
97,802
20
195,604
"Correct Solution: ``` N = int(input()) A = list(map(int,input().split())) ans = 0 for k in range(1,N): if A[k-1] < A[k]: ans += 1 print(ans) ```
output
1
97,802
20
195,605
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Today's Random Number E869120 You ran a campaign called "Today's Random Numbers" for N days. This is a project to generate a random number once a day and post the value on Twitter. The "random numbers of the day" on day $ 1, 2, 3, \ dots, N $ were $ A_1, A_2, A_3, \ dots, A_N $, respectively. E869120 You would be happy if today's random number is higher than yesterday's random number. How many times in the $ N $ day did E869120 make you happy with "Today's Random Numbers"? input Input is given from standard input in the following format. $ N $ $ A_1 $ $ A_2 $ $ A_3 $ $ \ dots $ $ A_N $ output Print out the number of times E869120 was pleased with "Today's Random Numbers" in one line in $ N $ days. However, insert a line break at the end. Constraint * $ 1 \ leq N \ leq 100000 \ (= 10 ^ 5) $ * $ 1 \ leq A_i \ leq 1000000000 \ (= 10 ^ 9) $ * All inputs are integers. Input example 1 Five 8 6 9 1 20 Output example 1 2 On the 3rd and 5th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 2 6 3 3 4 3 3 4 Output example 2 2 On the 3rd and 6th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 3 Ten 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Output example 3 0 E869120 You will not be happy with "Today's Random Numbers". Example Input 5 8 6 9 1 20 Output 2
instruction
0
97,803
20
195,606
"Correct Solution: ``` n=int(input()) a=list(map(int,input().split())) c=0 for i in range(1,n): if a[i-1]<a[i]: c+=1 print(c) ```
output
1
97,803
20
195,607
Provide a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Today's Random Number E869120 You ran a campaign called "Today's Random Numbers" for N days. This is a project to generate a random number once a day and post the value on Twitter. The "random numbers of the day" on day $ 1, 2, 3, \ dots, N $ were $ A_1, A_2, A_3, \ dots, A_N $, respectively. E869120 You would be happy if today's random number is higher than yesterday's random number. How many times in the $ N $ day did E869120 make you happy with "Today's Random Numbers"? input Input is given from standard input in the following format. $ N $ $ A_1 $ $ A_2 $ $ A_3 $ $ \ dots $ $ A_N $ output Print out the number of times E869120 was pleased with "Today's Random Numbers" in one line in $ N $ days. However, insert a line break at the end. Constraint * $ 1 \ leq N \ leq 100000 \ (= 10 ^ 5) $ * $ 1 \ leq A_i \ leq 1000000000 \ (= 10 ^ 9) $ * All inputs are integers. Input example 1 Five 8 6 9 1 20 Output example 1 2 On the 3rd and 5th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 2 6 3 3 4 3 3 4 Output example 2 2 On the 3rd and 6th days, E869120 is happy. Input example 3 Ten 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Output example 3 0 E869120 You will not be happy with "Today's Random Numbers". Example Input 5 8 6 9 1 20 Output 2
instruction
0
97,804
20
195,608
"Correct Solution: ``` n=int(input()) a=list(map(int, input().split())) ans=0 for i in range(1, n): if a[i]>a[i-1]: ans+=1 print(ans) ```
output
1
97,804
20
195,609
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros.
instruction
0
97,906
20
195,812
Tags: greedy, implementation, strings Correct Solution: ``` l, s = int(input()), input() ans = int(s) def check(a, b): a, b = list(a), list(b) b = b[::-1] while len(b) and b[-1] == '0': a.append(b.pop()) if not len(b): return b = b[::-1] a = ''.join(a) b = ''.join(b) global ans ans = min(ans, int(a) + int(b)) def check2(a, b): a, b = list(a), list(b) b = b[::-1] while len(a) and a[-1] == '0': b.append(a.pop()) if len(a) <= 1: return b.append(a.pop()) b = b[::-1] a = ''.join(a) b = ''.join(b) global ans ans = min(ans, int(a) + int(b)) check(s[ : l//2], s[l//2 : ]) check2(s[ : l//2], s[l//2 : ]) if l % 2: check(s[ : l//2 + 1], s[l//2 + 1 : ]) check2(s[ : l//2 + 1], s[l//2 + 1 : ]) print(ans) ```
output
1
97,906
20
195,813
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros.
instruction
0
97,907
20
195,814
Tags: greedy, implementation, strings Correct Solution: ``` import sys #(l,n) = list(map(int, input().split())) l = int(input()) n = int(input()) s = str(n) length = len(s) pos1 = max(length // 2 - 1, 1) pos2 = min(length // 2 + 1, length - 1) while (pos1 > 1) and s[pos1] == '0': pos1 -= 1 while (pos2 < length - 1) and s[pos2] == '0': pos2 += 1 sum = n for p in range(pos1, pos2 + 1): #print("p:", p) if (s[p] != '0'): #print(int(s[0 : p])) #print(s[p : length]) sum = min(sum, int(s[0 : p]) + int(s[p : length])) print(sum) sys.exit(0) ```
output
1
97,907
20
195,815
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros.
instruction
0
97,908
20
195,816
Tags: greedy, implementation, strings Correct Solution: ``` l=int(input()) s=input() mid=l//2 endfrom0=mid+1 beginforend=mid-1 def so(i): if(i==0 or i==l): return int(s) return int(s[0:i])+int(s[i:l]) while(endfrom0<l and s[endfrom0]=='0'): endfrom0+=1 while(beginforend>-1 and s[beginforend]=='0'): beginforend-=1 if(s[mid]!='0'): print(min(so(mid),so(endfrom0),so(beginforend))) else: print(min(so(endfrom0),so(beginforend))) ```
output
1
97,908
20
195,817
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros.
instruction
0
97,909
20
195,818
Tags: greedy, implementation, strings Correct Solution: ``` def IO(): import sys sys.stdout = open('output.txt', 'w') sys.stdin = open('input.txt', 'r') ###################### MAIN PROGRAM ##################### def main(): # IO() l = int(input()) n = str(input()) i = l // 2 - 1 lidx = -1 while (i >= 0): if (n[i + 1] != '0'): lidx = i break i -= 1 # print(lidx) ridx = l i = l // 2 + 1 while (i < l): if (n[i] != '0'): ridx = i break i += 1 #print(ridx) option1 = int() if (lidx != -1): option1 = int(n[0 : lidx + 1]) + int(n[lidx + 1:]) option2 = int() if (ridx < l): option2 = int(n[0 : ridx]) + int(n[ridx:]) # print(option1, option2) if (l == 2): print(int(n[0]) + int(n[1])) elif (lidx == -1): print(option2) elif (ridx == l): print(option1) else: print(min(option1, option2)) ##################### END OF PROGRAM #################### if __name__ == "__main__": main() ```
output
1
97,909
20
195,819
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros.
instruction
0
97,910
20
195,820
Tags: greedy, implementation, strings Correct Solution: ``` def main(): n = int(input()) s = input() ans = int(s) half = len(s) // 2 if len(s) % 2 == 0: for i in range(0, half): if s[half+i] == '0' and s[half-i] == '0': continue else: # print('try', half+i, half-i) if s[half+i] != '0': ans = min(ans, int(s[:half+i]) + int(s[half+i:])) if s[half-i] != '0': ans = min(ans, int(s[:half-i]) + int(s[half-i:])) break else: for i in range(0, half): if s[half+1+i] == '0' and s[half-i] == '0': continue else: if s[half+1+i] != '0': ans = min(ans, int(s[:half+1+i]) + int(s[half+1+i:])) if s[half-i] != '0': ans = min(ans, int(s[:half-i]) + int(s[half-i:])) break print(ans) if __name__ == '__main__': main() ```
output
1
97,910
20
195,821
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros.
instruction
0
97,911
20
195,822
Tags: greedy, implementation, strings Correct Solution: ``` n=int(input()) s=input() minm=int('9'*100010) for i in range(n//2+1,n): if(s[i]!='0'): minm=min(minm,int(s[:i])+int(s[i:])) break for i in range(n//2,0,-1): if(s[i]!='0'): minm=min(minm,int(s[:i])+int(s[i:])) break print(minm) ```
output
1
97,911
20
195,823
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros.
instruction
0
97,912
20
195,824
Tags: greedy, implementation, strings Correct Solution: ``` n = int(input()) s = input() best = [] b = 10**9 for i in range(n - 1): if s[i + 1] == '0': continue x = max(i + 1, n - i - 1) if x < b: best = [] b = x if x == b: best.append(i + 1) res = int(s) for i in best: res = min(res, int(s[0 : i]) + int(s[i :])) print(res) ```
output
1
97,912
20
195,825
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros.
instruction
0
97,913
20
195,826
Tags: greedy, implementation, strings Correct Solution: ``` n = int(input()) s = input() #s = '1' * n min_val = n for i in range(1, n) : if s[i] == '0' : continue min_val = min(min_val, max(i, n-i)) ans = int(s) for i in range(1, n) : if s[i] == '0' : continue if max(i, n-i) < min_val - 1 or max(i, n-i) > min_val: continue candi = int(s[:i]) + int(s[i:]) ans = min(ans, candi) print(ans) ```
output
1
97,913
20
195,827
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros. Submitted Solution: ``` n = int(input()) a = input() s = str(a) ans = 1e100000 cnt = 0; for i in range(n//2, -1, -1): if s[int(i + 1)] == '0': continue; ans = min(ans, int(s[0:i + 1]) + int(s[i + 1:n])) cnt = cnt + 1; if cnt >= 2: break; cnt = 0; for i in range(n//2, n - 1, 1): if s[int(i + 1)] == '0': continue; ans = min(ans, int(s[0:i + 1]) + int(s[i + 1:n])) cnt = cnt + 1; if cnt >= 2: break; print(ans) ```
instruction
0
97,914
20
195,828
Yes
output
1
97,914
20
195,829
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros. Submitted Solution: ``` n = int(input()) m = input() ans = 10 ** 110000 ind = n // 2 while(ind >= 0): if (m[ind] != '0'): break ind -= 1 if (ind > 0): ans = min(ans, int(m[:ind]) + int(m[ind:])) ind = n // 2 + 1 while(ind < n): if (m[ind] != '0'): break ind += 1 if (ind < n): ans = min(ans, int(m[:ind]) + int(m[ind:])) print(ans) ```
instruction
0
97,915
20
195,830
Yes
output
1
97,915
20
195,831
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros. Submitted Solution: ``` l = int(input()) s = input() possible = [] for i in range(1,l): if s[i] is not '0': possible.append(i) good = [possible[0]] digits1 = good[0] digits2 = l-digits1 maxdigits = max(digits1,digits2)+1 for p in possible: digits1 = p digits2 = l-digits1 localmax= max(digits1,digits2)+1 if localmax < maxdigits: maxdigits = localmax good = [p] elif localmax == maxdigits: good.append(p) best = 10*int(s) for g in good: part1 = int(s[:g]) part2 = int(s[g:]) best = min(best,part1+part2) print(best) ```
instruction
0
97,916
20
195,832
Yes
output
1
97,916
20
195,833
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros. Submitted Solution: ``` def gns(): return list(map(int,input().split())) n=int(input()) s=input() def sm(x): # if x==-1 or x==n-1 or n[x+1]=='0': ans=[] l=0 i,j=x,n-1 while i>=0 or j>x: if i>=0: si=s[i] else: si=0 sj=s[j] if j>x else 0 t=int(si)+int(sj)+l l=t//10 t=t%10 ans.append(t) i-=1 j-=1 if ans[-1]==0: ans.pop() return ans def cm(x,y): if len(x)>len(y): return True if len(y)>len(x): return False i=len(x)-1 while i>=0: if x[i]>y[i]: return True elif x[i]==y[i]: i-=1 continue else: return False def r(x): print(''.join(map(str,x[::-1]))) if n%2==0: m=n//2-1 x,y=m,m else: m=n//2 x,y=m-1,m if True: while x>=0 and y<n and s[x+1]=='0' and s[y+1]=='0': x-=1 y+=1 if s[x+1]!='0' and s[y+1]!='0': smx=sm(x) smy=sm(y) if cm(smx,smy): r(smy) quit() else: r(smx) quit() elif s[x+1]!='0': smx=sm(x) r(smx) quit() elif s[y+1]!='0': smy = sm(y) r(smy) quit() ```
instruction
0
97,917
20
195,834
Yes
output
1
97,917
20
195,835
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros. Submitted Solution: ``` def B(n, l): s = int(l) pos = n // 2; i = pos m = 1 cnt = 0 while i < n and i > 0 and cnt < 3: if l[i] != '0': s = min(int(l[:i]) + int(l[i:]), s) cnt += 1 i += m m += 1 m *= -1 return s n, l = int(input()), input() print(B(n, l)) ```
instruction
0
97,918
20
195,836
No
output
1
97,918
20
195,837
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros. Submitted Solution: ``` l = int(input()) s = str(input()) t = -(-l//2) print(int(s[:t]) + int((s[t:]))) ```
instruction
0
97,919
20
195,838
No
output
1
97,919
20
195,839
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros. Submitted Solution: ``` def findNotZero(s,half): min = 10000000 pos = 0 for i in s: if int(i) != 0 : if abs(pos-half) < abs(min-half) : min = pos elif abs(pos-half) == abs(min-half) : first = '' second = '' for i in s[min:] : first += str(i) for i in s[:pos] : second += str(i) # print(half,min,pos,first,second) if first == '' : min = pos elif int(first) > int(second) : min = pos pos += 1 return min def findResult(first,second): # print(first,second) pos = 0 first = first[::-1] second = second[::-1] res = '' r = 0 for i in range(len(first)): if(i < len(second)) : plus = (first[i] + second[i])+r else : plus = first[i]+r res += str(plus%10) r = plus//10 pos += 1 if r != 0 : res += str(r) print(res[::-1]) l = int(input()) s = [int(i) for i in input()] # print(s) half = len(s)//2 if s[half] == 0 : half = findNotZero(s,half) # print(half) first = s[:half] second = s[half:] elif l%2 == 1 and s[half] > s[0]: first = s[:half+1] second = s[half+1:] else : first = s[:half] second = s[half:] if len(first) >= len(second) : findResult(first,second) else : findResult(second,first) # print(result) # print(first,second) ```
instruction
0
97,920
20
195,840
No
output
1
97,920
20
195,841
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Dima worked all day and wrote down on a long paper strip his favorite number n consisting of l digits. Unfortunately, the strip turned out to be so long that it didn't fit in the Dima's bookshelf. To solve the issue, Dima decided to split the strip into two non-empty parts so that each of them contains a positive integer without leading zeros. After that he will compute the sum of the two integers and write it down on a new strip. Dima wants the resulting integer to be as small as possible, because it increases the chances that the sum will fit it in the bookshelf. Help Dima decide what is the minimum sum he can obtain. Input The first line contains a single integer l (2 โ‰ค l โ‰ค 100 000) โ€” the length of the Dima's favorite number. The second line contains the positive integer n initially written on the strip: the Dima's favorite number. The integer n consists of exactly l digits and it does not contain leading zeros. Dima guarantees, that there is at least one valid way to split the strip. Output Print a single integer โ€” the smallest number Dima can obtain. Examples Input 7 1234567 Output 1801 Input 3 101 Output 11 Note In the first example Dima can split the number 1234567 into integers 1234 and 567. Their sum is 1801. In the second example Dima can split the number 101 into integers 10 and 1. Their sum is 11. Note that it is impossible to split the strip into "1" and "01" since the numbers can't start with zeros. Submitted Solution: ``` l=int(input("dina number size")) n=str(input("dina number")) word="" c=1 min_num= int(n) for i in n: word=word+i part_1=int(word) part_2=(int(n)-((int(word))*(10**(l-c)))) if part_2<10**(l-c-1): c=c+1 continue temp_num=part_1+part_2 if min_num>temp_num: min_num=temp_num c=c+1 print(min_num) ```
instruction
0
97,921
20
195,842
No
output
1
97,921
20
195,843
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. The only difference between the easy and the hard versions is the maximum value of k. You are given an infinite sequence of form "112123123412345..." which consist of blocks of all consecutive positive integers written one after another. The first block consists of all numbers from 1 to 1, the second one โ€” from 1 to 2, the third one โ€” from 1 to 3, ..., the i-th block consists of all numbers from 1 to i. So the first 56 elements of the sequence are "11212312341234512345612345671234567812345678912345678910". Elements of the sequence are numbered from one. For example, the 1-st element of the sequence is 1, the 3-rd element of the sequence is 2, the 20-th element of the sequence is 5, the 38-th element is 2, the 56-th element of the sequence is 0. Your task is to answer q independent queries. In the i-th query you are given one integer k_i. Calculate the digit at the position k_i of the sequence. Input The first line of the input contains one integer q (1 โ‰ค q โ‰ค 500) โ€” the number of queries. The i-th of the following q lines contains one integer k_i (1 โ‰ค k_i โ‰ค 10^{18}) โ€” the description of the corresponding query. Output Print q lines. In the i-th line print one digit x_i (0 โ‰ค x_i โ‰ค 9) โ€” the answer to the query i, i.e. x_i should be equal to the element at the position k_i of the sequence. Examples Input 5 1 3 20 38 56 Output 1 2 5 2 0 Input 4 2132 506 999999999999999999 1000000000000000000 Output 8 2 4 1 Note Answers on queries from the first example are described in the problem statement.
instruction
0
97,939
20
195,878
Tags: binary search, math Correct Solution: ``` def s(i): n = 1 result = i while i >= n*9: i -= 9*n result += i n *= 10 return result def n(i): result = 0 while True: i //= 10 result += 1 if i == 0: break return result def get_char_from_block(i, k): k = k if k != 0 else s(i) c = 1 m = 1 if k < 10: return k while k > 9*m*c: k -= 9*m*c m *= 10 c += 1 ost = (k + c - 1) % c num = ((k + c - 1) // c) + m - 1 while ost < c - 1: num //= 10 ost += 1 return num % 10 def main(): q = int(input()) for i in range(q): k = int(input()) l, r = int(1), int(10**9) res = 0 """h = 1 block_i = 0 p = 0 m = 0 while p < k: m += 1 i = m p = 0 c = 10**(n(i) - 1) while c != 0: p += (s(c) + s(i)) * (i - c + 1) // 2 i = c - 1 c //= 10 if k == 1: print(1) continue p -= s(m) res = get_char_from_block(m , k - p) print(res)""" h = 1 while l + 1 < r: m = (l + r) // 2 i = m c = 10**(n(i) - 1) p = 0 while c != 0: p += (s(c) + s(i)) * (i - c + 1) // 2 i = c - 1 c //= 10 if p > k: r = m else: h = p l = m if k == h: res = get_char_from_block(l, k - h) else: res = get_char_from_block(l + 1, k - h) print(res) if __name__ == "__main__": main() ```
output
1
97,939
20
195,879
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. The only difference between the easy and the hard versions is the maximum value of k. You are given an infinite sequence of form "112123123412345..." which consist of blocks of all consecutive positive integers written one after another. The first block consists of all numbers from 1 to 1, the second one โ€” from 1 to 2, the third one โ€” from 1 to 3, ..., the i-th block consists of all numbers from 1 to i. So the first 56 elements of the sequence are "11212312341234512345612345671234567812345678912345678910". Elements of the sequence are numbered from one. For example, the 1-st element of the sequence is 1, the 3-rd element of the sequence is 2, the 20-th element of the sequence is 5, the 38-th element is 2, the 56-th element of the sequence is 0. Your task is to answer q independent queries. In the i-th query you are given one integer k_i. Calculate the digit at the position k_i of the sequence. Input The first line of the input contains one integer q (1 โ‰ค q โ‰ค 500) โ€” the number of queries. The i-th of the following q lines contains one integer k_i (1 โ‰ค k_i โ‰ค 10^{18}) โ€” the description of the corresponding query. Output Print q lines. In the i-th line print one digit x_i (0 โ‰ค x_i โ‰ค 9) โ€” the answer to the query i, i.e. x_i should be equal to the element at the position k_i of the sequence. Examples Input 5 1 3 20 38 56 Output 1 2 5 2 0 Input 4 2132 506 999999999999999999 1000000000000000000 Output 8 2 4 1 Note Answers on queries from the first example are described in the problem statement.
instruction
0
97,945
20
195,890
Tags: binary search, math Correct Solution: ``` from functools import * def sumnum(start, end): # ex end # inc start return end*(end-1)//2 -start*(start-1)//2 def digits(i): return len(f"{i}") @lru_cache(maxsize=32) def digit_count(i): if i==0: return 0 d = digits(i) base = 10**(d-1)-1 return digit_count(base) + d*(i-base) @lru_cache(maxsize=32) def cumulative_digit_count(i): if i==0: return 0 d = digits(i); base = 10**(d-1)-1 return cumulative_digit_count(base) + digit_count(base)*(i-base) + d*sumnum(base+1, i+1) - d*(base)*(i-base) def bin_search(k, f): for d in range(1,20): if f(10**(d-1)-1) > k: break upper = 10**(d-1)-1 lower = 10**(d-2)-1 while upper-lower > 1: middle = (lower+upper)//2; if f(middle) > k: upper = middle else: lower = middle return lower, k-f(lower) def answer(q): lower1, k = bin_search(q, cumulative_digit_count) if k==0: return lower1 % 10 lower2, l = bin_search(k, digit_count) if l==0: return lower2 % 10 return int(f"{lower2 + 1}"[l-1]) def naive_cum(i): cum = 0 for ii in range(1, i+1): for j in range(1, ii+1): cum = cum + len(f"{j}") return cum # print("cum", cum) a = input() for i in range(int(a)): q=input() print(answer(int(q))) ```
output
1
97,945
20
195,891
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1.
instruction
0
98,034
20
196,068
Tags: dfs and similar, dp, graphs, math Correct Solution: ``` import sys input = sys.stdin.readline ############ ---- Input Functions ---- ############ def inp(): return(int(input())) def inlt(): return(list(map(int,input().split()))) def insr(): s = input().strip() return(list(s[:len(s)])) def invr(): return(map(int,input().split())) def from_file(f): return f.readline def build_graph(n, A, reversed=False): edges = [[] for _ in range(n)] for i, j in A: i -= 1 j -= 1 if reversed: j, i = i, j edges[i].append(j) return edges def fill_min(s, edges, visited_dfs, visited, container): visited[s] = True visited_dfs.add(s) for c in edges[s]: if c in visited_dfs: # cycle return -1 if not visited[c]: res = fill_min(c, edges, visited_dfs, visited, container) if res == -1: return -1 container[s] = min(container[s], container[c]) visited_dfs.remove(s) return 0 def dfs(s, edges, visited, container): stack = [s] colors = {s: 0} while stack: v = stack.pop() if colors[v] == 0: colors[v] = 1 stack.append(v) else: # all children are visited tmp = [container[c] for c in edges[v]] if tmp: container[v] = min(min(tmp), container[v]) colors[v] = 2 # finished visited[v] = True for c in edges[v]: if visited[c]: continue if c not in colors: colors[c] = 0 # white stack.append(c) elif colors[c] == 1: # grey return -1 return 0 def iterate_topologically(n, edges, container): visited = [False] * n for s in range(n): if not visited[s]: # visited_dfs = set() # res = fill_min(s, edges, visited_dfs, visited, container) res = dfs(s, edges, visited, container) if res == -1: return -1 return 0 def solve(n, A): edges = build_graph(n, A, False) container_forward = list(range(n)) container_backward = list(range(n)) res = iterate_topologically(n, edges, container_forward) if res == -1: return None edges = build_graph(n, A, True) iterate_topologically(n, edges, container_backward) container = [min(i,j) for i,j in zip(container_forward, container_backward)] res = sum((1 if container[i] == i else 0 for i in range(n))) s = "".join(["A" if container[i] == i else "E" for i in range(n)]) return res, s # with open('5.txt') as f: # input = from_file(f) n, m = invr() A = [] for _ in range(m): i, j = invr() A.append((i, j)) result = solve(n, A) if not result: print (-1) else: print(f"{result[0]}") print(f"{result[1]}") ```
output
1
98,034
20
196,069
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1.
instruction
0
98,035
20
196,070
Tags: dfs and similar, dp, graphs, math Correct Solution: ``` import os import sys if os.path.exists('/mnt/c/Users/Square/square/codeforces'): f = iter(open('E.in').readlines()) def input(): return next(f) else: input = sys.stdin.readline n, m = map(int, input().split()) g = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} r = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} for _ in range(m): u, v = map(int, input().split()) g[u].append(v) r[v].append(u) mincomp = list(range(n+1)) try: for gr in [g, r]: color = [0] * (n+1) for i in range(1, n+1): if color[i] == 0: s = [i] while s: u = s[-1] if color[u] == 0: color[u] = 1 for v in gr[u]: if color[v] == 0: s.append(v) mincomp[v] = min(mincomp[u], mincomp[v]) elif color[v] == 1: raise RuntimeError if s[-1] == u: color[u] = 2 s.pop() elif color[u] == 1: color[u] = 2 u = s.pop() elif color[u] == 2: s.pop() print(sum([u <= mincomp[u] for u in range(1, n+1)])) print(''.join(['A' if u <= mincomp[u] else 'E' for u in range(1, n+1)])) except RuntimeError: print(-1) ```
output
1
98,035
20
196,071
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1.
instruction
0
98,036
20
196,072
Tags: dfs and similar, dp, graphs, math Correct Solution: ``` import sys def input(): return sys.stdin.readline().rstrip() from collections import deque def find_loop(n, e, flag): x = [0]*n d = deque() t = [] c = 0 for i in range(n): for j in e[i]: x[j] += 1 for i in range(n): if x[i] == 0: d.append(i) t.append(i) c += 1 while d: i = d.popleft() for j in e[i]: x[j] -= 1 if x[j] == 0: d.append(j) t.append(j) c += 1 if c!=n: print(-1) exit() return t n,m=map(int,input().split()) edge=[[]for _ in range(n)] redge=[[]for _ in range(n)] into=[0]*n for _ in range(m): a,b=map(int,input().split()) a-=1 b-=1 into[b]+=1 edge[a].append(b) redge[b].append(a) dag=find_loop(n,edge,0) mi=list(range(n)) for node in dag[::-1]: for mode in redge[node]: mi[mode]=min(mi[node],mi[mode]) ans=["E"]*n visited=[0]*n for i in range(n): if visited[i]==0: stack=[i] ans[i]="A" visited[i]=1 for node in stack: for mode in edge[node]: if visited[mode]:continue visited[mode]=1 stack.append(mode) for i in range(n): if i>mi[i]:ans[i]="E" print(ans.count("A")) print("".join(ans)) ```
output
1
98,036
20
196,073
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1.
instruction
0
98,037
20
196,074
Tags: dfs and similar, dp, graphs, math Correct Solution: ``` import os import sys if os.path.exists('/mnt/c/Users/Square/square/codeforces'): f = iter(open('E.in').readlines()) def input(): return next(f) else: input = sys.stdin.readline n, m = map(int, input().split()) g = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} r = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} for _ in range(m): u, v = map(int, input().split()) g[u].append(v) r[v].append(u) mincomp = list(range(n+1)) # res = [0 for _ in range(n+1)] # from collections import deque try: for gr in [g, r]: color = [0] * (n+1) for i in range(1, n+1): if color[i] == 0: s = [i] while s: u = s[-1] if color[u] == 0: color[u] = 1 for v in gr[u]: if color[v] == 0: s.append(v) mincomp[v] = min(mincomp[u], mincomp[v]) elif color[v] == 1: raise RuntimeError # if s[-1] == u: # color[u] = 2 # s.pop() elif color[u] == 1: color[u] = 2 u = s.pop() elif color[u] == 2: s.pop() print(sum([u <= mincomp[u] for u in range(1, n+1)])) print(''.join(['A' if u <= mincomp[u] else 'E' for u in range(1, n+1)])) except RuntimeError: print(-1) ```
output
1
98,037
20
196,075
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1.
instruction
0
98,038
20
196,076
Tags: dfs and similar, dp, graphs, math Correct Solution: ``` import sys from collections import deque input=sys.stdin.readline n,m=map(int,input().split()) edge=[[] for i in range(n)] revedge=[[] for i in range(n)] for i in range(m): j,k=map(int,input().split()) edge[j-1].append(k-1) revedge[k-1].append(j-1) deg=[len(revedge[i]) for i in range(n)] ans = list(v for v in range(n) if deg[v]==0) deq = deque(ans) used = [0]*n while deq: v = deq.popleft() for t in edge[v]: deg[t] -= 1 if deg[t]==0: deq.append(t) ans.append(t) if len(ans)!=n: print(-1) exit() res=0 potential=[0]*n revpotential=[0]*n ans=[""]*n def bfs(v): que=deque([v]) potential[v]=1 while que: pos=que.popleft() for nv in edge[pos]: if not potential[nv]: potential[nv]=1 que.append(nv) def revbfs(v): que=deque([v]) revpotential[v]=1 while que: pos=que.popleft() for nv in revedge[pos]: if not revpotential[nv]: revpotential[nv]=1 que.append(nv) for i in range(n): if not potential[i] and not revpotential[i]: ans[i]="A" res+=1 bfs(i) revbfs(i) else: ans[i]="E" bfs(i) revbfs(i) print(res) print("".join(ans)) ```
output
1
98,038
20
196,077
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1.
instruction
0
98,039
20
196,078
Tags: dfs and similar, dp, graphs, math Correct Solution: ``` import collections import sys input=sys.stdin.readline n,m=map(int,input().split()) ans=['']*(n+1) g1=[[] for _ in range(n+1)] g2=[[] for _ in range(n+1)] deg=[0]*(n+1) for _ in range(m): a,b=map(int,input().split()) g1[a].append(b) g2[b].append(a) deg[a]+=1 status=[0]*(n+1) q=collections.deque() for i in range(1,n+1): if deg[i]==0: q.append(i) while len(q)!=0: v=q.pop() status[v]=1 for u in g2[v]: deg[u]-=1 if deg[u]==0: q.append(u) if status.count(0)>=2: print(-1) else: status1=[0]*(n+1) status2=[0]*(n+1) for i in range(1,n+1): if status1[i]==0 and status2[i]==0: ans[i]='A' else: ans[i]='E' if status1[i]==0: q=collections.deque() q.append(i) while len(q)!=0: v=q.pop() status1[v]=1 for u in g1[v]: if status1[u]==0: status1[u]=1 q.append(u) if status2[i]==0: q=collections.deque() q.append(i) while len(q)!=0: v=q.pop() status2[v]=1 for u in g2[v]: if status2[u]==0: status2[u]=1 q.append(u) print(ans.count('A')) print(''.join(map(str,ans[1:]))) ```
output
1
98,039
20
196,079
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1.
instruction
0
98,040
20
196,080
Tags: dfs and similar, dp, graphs, math Correct Solution: ``` import os import sys if os.path.exists('/mnt/c/Users/Square/square/codeforces'): f = iter(open('E.in').readlines()) def input(): return next(f) else: input = sys.stdin.readline n, m = map(int, input().split()) g = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} r = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} for _ in range(m): u, v = map(int, input().split()) g[u].append(v) r[v].append(u) mincomp = list(range(n+1)) try: for gr in [g, r]: color = [0] * (n+1) for i in range(1, n+1): if color[i] == 0: s = [i] while s: u = s.pop() if color[u] == 0: s.append(u) color[u] = 1 for v in gr[u]: if color[v] == 0: s.append(v) mincomp[v] = min(mincomp[u], mincomp[v]) elif color[v] == 1: raise RuntimeError elif color[u] == 1: color[u] = 2 # print(sum([u <= mincomp[u] for u in range(1, n+1)])) s = ''.join(['A' if u <= mincomp[u] else 'E' for u in range(1, n+1)]) print(s.count('A')) print(s) except RuntimeError: print(-1) ```
output
1
98,040
20
196,081
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1.
instruction
0
98,041
20
196,082
Tags: dfs and similar, dp, graphs, math Correct Solution: ``` import sys n, m = [int(x) for x in input().split()] adj_for = [[] for _ in range(n)] adj_back = [[] for _ in range(n)] for _ in range(m): a, b = [int(x) for x in sys.stdin.readline().split()] a -= 1 b -= 1 adj_for[a].append(b) adj_back[b].append(a) lens = [len(adj_back[i]) for i in range(n)] stack = [x for x in range(n) if lens[x] == 0] toposort = [x for x in range(n) if lens[x] == 0] while len(stack): cur = stack.pop() for nb in adj_for[cur]: lens[nb] -= 1 if lens[nb] == 0: toposort.append(nb) stack.append(nb) if len(toposort) != n: print(-1) sys.exit(0) min_above = list(range(n)) min_below = list(range(n)) for i in toposort: for j in adj_back[i]: if min_above[j] < min_above[i]: min_above[i] = min_above[j] for i in reversed(toposort): for j in adj_for[i]: if min_below[j] < min_below[i]: min_below[i] = min_below[j] qt = ["A" if min_below[i] == min_above[i] == i else "E" for i in range(n)] # qt = [None for x in range(n)] # # for i in range(n): # if qt[i] is not None: # continue # qt[i] = 'A' # stack_for = [i] # while len(stack_for): # cur = stack_for.pop() # for nb in adj_for[cur]: # if qt[nb] is None: # qt[nb] = 'E' # stack_for.append(nb) # # # stack_back = [i] # while len(stack_back): # cur = stack_back.pop() # for nb in adj_back[cur]: # if qt[nb] is None: # qt[nb] = 'E' # stack_back.append(nb) # print(len([x for x in qt if x == 'A'])) print("".join(qt)) ```
output
1
98,041
20
196,083
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1. Submitted Solution: ``` import os import sys if os.path.exists('/mnt/c/Users/Square/square/codeforces'): f = iter(open('E.in').readlines()) def input(): return next(f) else: input = sys.stdin.readline n, m = map(int, input().split()) g = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} r = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} for _ in range(m): u, v = map(int, input().split()) g[u].append(v) r[v].append(u) mincomp = list(range(n+1)) try: for gr in [g, r]: color = [0] * (n+1) for i in range(1, n+1): if color[i] == 0: s = [i] while s: u = s[-1] if color[u] == 0: color[u] = 1 for v in gr[u]: if color[v] == 0: s.append(v) mincomp[v] = min(mincomp[u], mincomp[v]) elif color[v] == 1: raise RuntimeError # if s[-1] == u: # color[u] = 2 # s.pop() elif color[u] == 1: color[u] = 2 u = s.pop() elif color[u] == 2: s.pop() print(sum([u <= mincomp[u] for u in range(1, n+1)])) print(''.join(['A' if u <= mincomp[u] else 'E' for u in range(1, n+1)])) except RuntimeError: print(-1) ```
instruction
0
98,042
20
196,084
Yes
output
1
98,042
20
196,085
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1. Submitted Solution: ``` import os import sys if os.path.exists('/mnt/c/Users/Square/square/codeforces'): f = iter(open('E.in').readlines()) def input(): return next(f) else: input = sys.stdin.readline n, m = map(int, input().split()) g = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} r = {i : [] for i in range(1, n+1)} for _ in range(m): u, v = map(int, input().split()) g[u].append(v) r[v].append(u) mincomp = list(range(n+1)) try: for gr in [g, r]: color = [0] * (n+1) for i in range(1, n+1): if color[i] == 0: s = [i] while s: u = s.pop() if color[u] == 0: s.append(u) color[u] = 1 for v in gr[u]: if color[v] == 0: s.append(v) mincomp[v] = min(mincomp[u], mincomp[v]) elif color[v] == 1: raise RuntimeError elif color[u] == 1: color[u] = 2 print(sum([u <= mincomp[u] for u in range(1, n+1)])) print(''.join(['A' if u <= mincomp[u] else 'E' for u in range(1, n+1)])) except RuntimeError: print(-1) ```
instruction
0
98,043
20
196,086
Yes
output
1
98,043
20
196,087
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1. Submitted Solution: ``` import sys n, m, *jk = map(int, sys.stdin.buffer.read().split()) links = [set() for _ in range(n)] rev_links = [set() for _ in range(n)] degrees_in = [0] * n for j, k in zip(jk[0::2], jk[1::2]): j -= 1 k -= 1 if k not in links[j]: degrees_in[k] += 1 links[j].add(k) rev_links[k].add(j) s = {i for i, c in enumerate(degrees_in) if c == 0} length = 0 while s: length += 1 v = s.pop() for u in links[v]: degrees_in[u] -= 1 if degrees_in[u] == 0: s.add(u) if length < n: print(-1) exit() ans = ['E'] * n larger_fixed = [False] * n smaller_fixed = [False] * n universal_cnt = 0 for i in range(n): if not larger_fixed[i] and not smaller_fixed[i]: ans[i] = 'A' universal_cnt += 1 q = [i] while q: v = q.pop() if larger_fixed[v]: continue larger_fixed[v] = True q.extend(u for u in links[v] if not larger_fixed[u]) q = [i] while q: v = q.pop() if smaller_fixed[v]: continue smaller_fixed[v] = True q.extend(u for u in rev_links[v] if not smaller_fixed[u]) print(universal_cnt) print(''.join(ans)) ```
instruction
0
98,044
20
196,088
Yes
output
1
98,044
20
196,089
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1. Submitted Solution: ``` import sys;input=sys.stdin.readline N, M = map(int, input().split()) G1 = [[] for _ in range(N+1)] G2 = [[] for _ in range(N+1)] for _ in range(M): x, y = map(int, input().split()) G1[x].append(y) G2[y].append(x) lens = [len(G2[i]) for i in range(N+1)] stack = [x for x in range(N+1) if lens[x] == 0 and x != 0] topo = [x for x in range(N+1) if lens[x] == 0 and x != 0] #print(topo) while stack: cur = stack.pop() for nb in G1[cur]: lens[nb] -= 1 if lens[nb] == 0: topo.append(nb) stack.append(nb) #print(topo) if len(topo) != N: print(-1) sys.exit(0) R = [0] * (N+1) v1 = set() v2 = set() c = 0 for s in range(1, N+1): if s in v1 or s in v2: R[s] = 'E' else: R[s] = 'A' c += 1 stack = [s] while stack: v = stack.pop() for u in G1[v]: if u in v1: continue v1.add(u) stack.append(u) stack = [s] while stack: v = stack.pop() for u in G2[v]: if u in v2: continue v2.add(u) stack.append(u) print(c) print("".join(R[1:])) ```
instruction
0
98,045
20
196,090
Yes
output
1
98,045
20
196,091
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1. Submitted Solution: ``` n, m = map(int, input().split()) adj = [[] for _ in range(n)] in_deg = [0] * n for _ in range(m): u, v = map(int, input().split()) u -= 1 v -= 1 adj[u].append(v) in_deg[v] += 1 q = [i for i, deg in enumerate(in_deg) if deg == 0] while q: top = q.pop() for nei in adj[top]: in_deg[nei] -= 1 if in_deg[nei] == 0: q.append(nei) if any(in_deg): print(-1) exit() is_all = [1] * n for u in range(n): for v in adj[u]: is_all[max(u, v)] = 0 print(sum(is_all)) print("".join("EA"[ia] for ia in is_all)) ```
instruction
0
98,046
20
196,092
No
output
1
98,046
20
196,093
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1. Submitted Solution: ``` # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- import sys # sys.setrecursionlimit(10**6) buff_readline = sys.stdin.buffer.readline readline = sys.stdin.readline INF = 2**62-1 def read_int(): return int(buff_readline()) def read_int_n(): return list(map(int, buff_readline().split())) def read_float(): return float(buff_readline()) def read_float_n(): return list(map(float, buff_readline().split())) def read_str(): return readline().strip() def read_str_n(): return readline().strip().split() def error_print(*args): print(*args, file=sys.stderr) def mt(f): import time def wrap(*args, **kwargs): s = time.time() ret = f(*args, **kwargs) e = time.time() error_print(e - s, 'sec') return ret return wrap @mt def slv(N, M, S): ls = set() rs = set() for l, r in S: ls.add(l) rs.add(r) if ls & rs: return -1 ans = [] for i in range(1, N+1): if i in rs: ans.append('E') else: ans.append('A') return str(ans.count('A')) + '\n' + ''.join(ans) def main(): N, M = read_int_n() S = [read_int_n() for _ in range(M)] print(slv(N, M, S)) if __name__ == '__main__': main() ```
instruction
0
98,047
20
196,094
No
output
1
98,047
20
196,095
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1. Submitted Solution: ``` from bisect import * from collections import * from math import gcd,ceil,sqrt,floor,inf from heapq import * from itertools import * #from operator import add,mul,sub,xor,truediv,floordiv from functools import * #------------------------------------------------------------------------ import os import sys from io import BytesIO, IOBase # region fastio BUFSIZE = 8192 class FastIO(IOBase): newlines = 0 def __init__(self, file): self._fd = file.fileno() self.buffer = BytesIO() self.writable = "x" in file.mode or "r" not in file.mode self.write = self.buffer.write if self.writable else None def read(self): while True: b = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, BUFSIZE)) if not b: break ptr = self.buffer.tell() self.buffer.seek(0, 2), self.buffer.write(b), self.buffer.seek(ptr) self.newlines = 0 return self.buffer.read() def readline(self): while self.newlines == 0: b = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, BUFSIZE)) self.newlines = b.count(b"\n") + (not b) ptr = self.buffer.tell() self.buffer.seek(0, 2), self.buffer.write(b), self.buffer.seek(ptr) self.newlines -= 1 return self.buffer.readline() def flush(self): if self.writable: os.write(self._fd, self.buffer.getvalue()) self.buffer.truncate(0), self.buffer.seek(0) class IOWrapper(IOBase): def __init__(self, file): self.buffer = FastIO(file) self.flush = self.buffer.flush self.writable = self.buffer.writable self.write = lambda s: self.buffer.write(s.encode("ascii")) self.read = lambda: self.buffer.read().decode("ascii") self.readline = lambda: self.buffer.readline().decode("ascii") sys.stdin, sys.stdout = IOWrapper(sys.stdin), IOWrapper(sys.stdout) input = lambda: sys.stdin.readline().rstrip("\r\n") #------------------------------------------------------------------------ def RL(): return map(int, sys.stdin.readline().rstrip().split()) def RLL(): return list(map(int, sys.stdin.readline().rstrip().split())) def N(): return int(input()) #------------------------------------------------------------------------ from types import GeneratorType def bootstrap(f, stack=[]): def wrappedfunc(*args, **kwargs): if stack: return f(*args, **kwargs) else: to = f(*args, **kwargs) while True: if type(to) is GeneratorType: stack.append(to) to = next(to) else: stack.pop() if not stack: break to = stack[-1].send(to) return to return wrappedfunc farr=[1] ifa=[] def fact(x,mod=0): if mod: while x>=len(farr): farr.append(farr[-1]*len(farr)%mod) else: while x>=len(farr): farr.append(farr[-1]*len(farr)) return farr[x] def ifact(x,mod): global ifa fact(x,mod) ifa.append(pow(farr[-1],mod-2,mod)) for i in range(x,0,-1): ifa.append(ifa[-1]*i%mod) ifa.reverse() def per(i,j,mod=0): if i<j: return 0 if not mod: return fact(i)//fact(i-j) return farr[i]*ifa[i-j]%mod def com(i,j,mod=0): if i<j: return 0 if not mod: return per(i,j)//fact(j) return per(i,j,mod)*ifa[j]%mod def catalan(n): return com(2*n,n)//(n+1) def isprime(n): for i in range(2,int(n**0.5)+1): if n%i==0: return False return True def lowbit(n): return n&-n def inverse(a,m): a%=m if a<=1: return a return ((1-inverse(m,a)*m)//a)%m class BIT: def __init__(self,arr): self.arr=arr self.n=len(arr)-1 def update(self,x,v): while x<=self.n: self.arr[x]+=v x+=x&-x def query(self,x): ans=0 while x: ans+=self.arr[x] x&=x-1 return ans ''' class SMT: def __init__(self,arr): self.n=len(arr)-1 self.arr=[0]*(self.n<<2) self.lazy=[0]*(self.n<<2) def Build(l,r,rt): if l==r: self.arr[rt]=arr[l] return m=(l+r)>>1 Build(l,m,rt<<1) Build(m+1,r,rt<<1|1) self.pushup(rt) Build(1,self.n,1) def pushup(self,rt): self.arr[rt]=self.arr[rt<<1]+self.arr[rt<<1|1] def pushdown(self,rt,ln,rn):#lr,rn่กจๅŒบ้—ดๆ•ฐๅญ—ๆ•ฐ if self.lazy[rt]: self.lazy[rt<<1]+=self.lazy[rt] self.lazy[rt<<1|1]+=self.lazy[rt] self.arr[rt<<1]+=self.lazy[rt]*ln self.arr[rt<<1|1]+=self.lazy[rt]*rn self.lazy[rt]=0 def update(self,L,R,c,l=1,r=None,rt=1):#L,R่กจ็คบๆ“ไฝœๅŒบ้—ด if r==None: r=self.n if L<=l and r<=R: self.arr[rt]+=c*(r-l+1) self.lazy[rt]+=c return m=(l+r)>>1 self.pushdown(rt,m-l+1,r-m) if L<=m: self.update(L,R,c,l,m,rt<<1) if R>m: self.update(L,R,c,m+1,r,rt<<1|1) self.pushup(rt) def query(self,L,R,l=1,r=None,rt=1): if r==None: r=self.n #print(L,R,l,r,rt) if L<=l and R>=r: return self.arr[rt] m=(l+r)>>1 self.pushdown(rt,m-l+1,r-m) ans=0 if L<=m: ans+=self.query(L,R,l,m,rt<<1) if R>m: ans+=self.query(L,R,m+1,r,rt<<1|1) return ans ''' class DSU:#ๅฎน้‡+่ทฏๅพ„ๅŽ‹็ผฉ def __init__(self,n): self.c=[-1]*n def same(self,x,y): return self.find(x)==self.find(y) def find(self,x): if self.c[x]<0: return x self.c[x]=self.find(self.c[x]) return self.c[x] def union(self,u,v): u,v=self.find(u),self.find(v) if u==v: return False if self.c[u]>self.c[v]: u,v=v,u self.c[u]+=self.c[v] self.c[v]=u return True def size(self,x): return -self.c[self.find(x)] class UFS:#็งฉ+่ทฏๅพ„ def __init__(self,n): self.parent=[i for i in range(n)] self.ranks=[0]*n def find(self,x): if x!=self.parent[x]: self.parent[x]=self.find(self.parent[x]) return self.parent[x] def union(self,u,v): pu,pv=self.find(u),self.find(v) if pu==pv: return False if self.ranks[pu]>=self.ranks[pv]: self.parent[pv]=pu if self.ranks[pv]==self.ranks[pu]: self.ranks[pu]+=1 else: self.parent[pu]=pv def Prime(n): c=0 prime=[] flag=[0]*(n+1) for i in range(2,n+1): if not flag[i]: prime.append(i) c+=1 for j in range(c): if i*prime[j]>n: break flag[i*prime[j]]=prime[j] if i%prime[j]==0: break return prime def dij(s,graph): d={} d[s]=0 heap=[(0,s)] seen=set() while heap: dis,u=heappop(heap) if u in seen: continue seen.add(u) for v,w in graph[u]: if v not in d or d[v]>d[u]+w: d[v]=d[u]+w heappush(heap,(d[v],v)) return d def GP(it): return [[ch,len(list(g))] for ch,g in groupby(it)] class DLN: def __init__(self,val): self.val=val self.pre=None self.next=None def nb(i,j): for ni,nj in [[i+1,j],[i-1,j],[i,j-1],[i,j+1]]: if 0<=ni<n and 0<=nj<m: yield ni,nj @bootstrap def gdfs(r,p): if len(g[r])==1 and p!=-1: yield None for ch in g[r]: if ch!=p: yield gdfs(ch,r) yield None def lcm(a,b): return a*b//gcd(a,b) @bootstrap def down(r): for ch in g[r]: if can[ch]: can[ch]=0 yield down(ch) yield None @bootstrap def up(r): for ch in par[r]: if can[ch]: can[ch]=0 yield up(ch) yield None t=1 for i in range(t): n,m=RL() g=[[] for i in range(n+1)] par=[[] for i in range(n+1)] ind=[0]*(n+1) for i in range(m): u,v=RL() g[u].append(v) ind[v]+=1 par[v].append(u) q=deque() vis=set() for i in range(1,n+1): if ind[i]==0: q.append(i) vis.add(i) while q: u=q.popleft() for v in g[u]: ind[v]-=1 if ind[v]==0: q.append(v) vis.add(v) if not len(vis)==n: print(-1) exit() ans=[] c=0 can=[1]*(n+1) for i in range(1,n+1): if can[i]: ans.append('A') c+=1 can[i]=0 up(i) down(i) else: ans.append('E') print(c) ans=''.join(ans) print(ans) ''' sys.setrecursionlimit(200000) import threading threading.stack_size(10**8) t=threading.Thread(target=main) t.start() t.join() ''' ''' sys.setrecursionlimit(200000) import threading threading.stack_size(10**8) t=threading.Thread(target=main) t.start() t.join() ''' ```
instruction
0
98,048
20
196,096
No
output
1
98,048
20
196,097
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Logical quantifiers are very useful tools for expressing claims about a set. For this problem, let's focus on the set of real numbers specifically. The set of real numbers includes zero and negatives. There are two kinds of quantifiers: universal (โˆ€) and existential (โˆƒ). You can read more about them here. The universal quantifier is used to make a claim that a statement holds for all real numbers. For example: * โˆ€ x,x<100 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is less than 100. This statement is false. * โˆ€ x,x>x-1 is read as: for all real numbers x, x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. The existential quantifier is used to make a claim that there exists some real number for which the statement holds. For example: * โˆƒ x,x<100 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is less than 100. This statement is true. * โˆƒ x,x>x-1 is read as: there exists a real number x such that x is greater than x-1. This statement is true. Moreover, these quantifiers can be nested. For example: * โˆ€ x,โˆƒ y,x<y is read as: for all real numbers x, there exists a real number y such that x is less than y. This statement is true since for every x, there exists y=x+1. * โˆƒ y,โˆ€ x,x<y is read as: there exists a real number y such that for all real numbers x, x is less than y. This statement is false because it claims that there is a maximum real number: a number y larger than every x. Note that the order of variables and quantifiers is important for the meaning and veracity of a statement. There are n variables x_1,x_2,โ€ฆ,x_n, and you are given some formula of the form $$$ f(x_1,...,x_n):=(x_{j_1}<x_{k_1})โˆง (x_{j_2}<x_{k_2})โˆง โ‹…โ‹…โ‹…โˆง (x_{j_m}<x_{k_m}), $$$ where โˆง denotes logical AND. That is, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) is true if every inequality x_{j_i}<x_{k_i} holds. Otherwise, if at least one inequality does not hold, then f(x_1,โ€ฆ,x_n) is false. Your task is to assign quantifiers Q_1,โ€ฆ,Q_n to either universal (โˆ€) or existential (โˆƒ) so that the statement $$$ Q_1 x_1, Q_2 x_2, โ€ฆ, Q_n x_n, f(x_1,โ€ฆ, x_n) $$$ is true, and the number of universal quantifiers is maximized, or determine that the statement is false for every possible assignment of quantifiers. Note that the order the variables appear in the statement is fixed. For example, if f(x_1,x_2):=(x_1<x_2) then you are not allowed to make x_2 appear first and use the statement โˆ€ x_2,โˆƒ x_1, x_1<x_2. If you assign Q_1=โˆƒ and Q_2=โˆ€, it will only be interpreted as โˆƒ x_1,โˆ€ x_2,x_1<x_2. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (2โ‰ค nโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5; 1โ‰ค mโ‰ค 2โ‹… 10^5) โ€” the number of variables and the number of inequalities in the formula, respectively. The next m lines describe the formula. The i-th of these lines contains two integers j_i,k_i (1โ‰ค j_i,k_iโ‰ค n, j_iโ‰  k_i). Output If there is no assignment of quantifiers for which the statement is true, output a single integer -1. Otherwise, on the first line output an integer, the maximum possible number of universal quantifiers. On the next line, output a string of length n, where the i-th character is "A" if Q_i should be a universal quantifier (โˆ€), or "E" if Q_i should be an existential quantifier (โˆƒ). All letters should be upper-case. If there are multiple solutions where the number of universal quantifiers is maximum, print any. Examples Input 2 1 1 2 Output 1 AE Input 4 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Output -1 Input 3 2 1 3 2 3 Output 2 AAE Note For the first test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆƒ x_2, x_1<x_2 is true. Answers of "EA" and "AA" give false statements. The answer "EE" gives a true statement, but the number of universal quantifiers in this string is less than in our answer. For the second test, we can show that no assignment of quantifiers, for which the statement is true exists. For the third test, the statement โˆ€ x_1, โˆ€ x_2, โˆƒ x_3, (x_1<x_3)โˆง (x_2<x_3) is true: We can set x_3=max\\{x_1,x_2\}+1. Submitted Solution: ``` import sys;input=sys.stdin.readline N, M = map(int, input().split()) G1 = [[] for _ in range(N+1)] G2 = [[] for _ in range(N+1)] for _ in range(M): x, y = map(int, input().split()) G1[x].append(y) G2[y].append(x) vs = set() for s in range(1, N+1): stack = [s] if s in vs: print(-1) sys.exit() vs.add(s) ps = set([s]) while stack: v = stack.pop() for u in G1[v]: if u in ps: print(-1) sys.exit() if u in vs: continue ps.add(u) vs.add(u) stack.append(u) R = [0] * (N+1) v1 = set() v2 = set() c = 0 for s in range(1, N+1): if s in v1 or s in v2: R[s] = 'E' else: R[s] = 'A' c += 1 stack = [s] while stack: v = stack.pop() for u in G1[v]: if u in v1: continue v1.add(u) stack.append(u) stack = [s] while stack: v = stack.pop() for u in G2[v]: if u in v2: continue v2.add(u) stack.append(u) print(c) print("".join(R[1:])) ```
instruction
0
98,049
20
196,098
No
output
1
98,049
20
196,099
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Amr doesn't like Maths as he finds it really boring, so he usually sleeps in Maths lectures. But one day the teacher suspected that Amr is sleeping and asked him a question to make sure he wasn't. First he gave Amr two positive integers n and k. Then he asked Amr, how many integer numbers x > 0 exist such that: * Decimal representation of x (without leading zeroes) consists of exactly n digits; * There exists some integer y > 0 such that: * <image>; * decimal representation of y is a suffix of decimal representation of x. As the answer to this question may be pretty huge the teacher asked Amr to output only its remainder modulo a number m. Can you help Amr escape this embarrassing situation? Input Input consists of three integers n, k, m (1 โ‰ค n โ‰ค 1000, 1 โ‰ค k โ‰ค 100, 1 โ‰ค m โ‰ค 109). Output Print the required number modulo m. Examples Input 1 2 1000 Output 4 Input 2 2 1000 Output 45 Input 5 3 1103 Output 590 Note A suffix of a string S is a non-empty string that can be obtained by removing some number (possibly, zero) of first characters from S.
instruction
0
98,239
20
196,478
Tags: dp, implementation Correct Solution: ``` def get_input(): hahaha=input() (n,k,m)=hahaha.split(sep=None, maxsplit=1000) return (int(n),int(k),int(m)) (n,k,m)=get_input() f=[0 for i in range(k)] s=0 for v in range(n): tens = 10**v%k f=[ (sum( [f[(j+k-(x+1)*tens)%k] for x in range(9)] )+f[j])%m for j in range(k)] for x in range(9): f[(x+1)*tens%k]+=1 if n-v-1==0: s+=(f[0]%m) else: s+=f[0]*((10**(n-v-2)*9))%m f[0]=0 print(s%m) ```
output
1
98,239
20
196,479