cluster_labels
int64 0
99
| chunks
stringlengths 7
4.26k
| point_ids
stringlengths 36
36
|
|---|---|---|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer to align and mainstream PDM work plan activities in the ministry budget, and work plans interventions to support implementation of the PDM activities as provided for in Paragraph 22 of Ministerial Statement on PDM to Parliament.
|
da12fed8-b669-47c2-bf3e-f2a65bcde9ac
|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer to ensure that priorities from Sub Counties/Town Councils are identified using the prescribed form Annex 1 of the PDM implementation guideline, and incorporated in the District budget and work plans to enable alignment of PDM activities for proper implementation.
|
b4f1499a-9786-447f-a4b4-a986f7704df6
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should;
37
ensure that PDM SACCOs review the household beneficiary list to identify those that do not qualify to receive funding.
enhance monitoring of the PDM SACCOs and their respective enterprise groups to ensure that they implement activities in line with LG selected Priority commodities.
ensure all beneficiaries are selected through the PDMIS as required by the PDM handbook.
liaise with the secretariate to have proper guidance in regards to obtaining agricultural insurance policies by beneficiaries.
|
85c32baa-80db-4a3b-ad6f-118136786702
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should encourage the SACCO leadership to formulate sub committees in order to easy coordination of farming related activities at the Parish.
Para. Financial Inclusion October 2022 provides that each Parish shall have a PDM SACCO and a PRF designated bank account for that PDM SACCO; in a branch of a supervised financial institution that is convenient for the members of the PDM SACCO.
|
f2109384-3d27-4b42-8da6-523a92126e94
|
2
|
Recommendation
I informed the Accounting Officer that the matter would be brought to the attention of the PDM Secretariats.
John F.S. Muwanga AUDITOR GENERAL
27 th December, 2023
35
|
683b41a6-7fbd-426b-acc4-6d436ece3c61
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should ensure that priorities from Sub Counties/ Divisions/Town Councils are identified and incorporated in the DLG's budget and work plans to enable alignment of PDM activities for proper implementation.
|
f138108f-7266-4105-9bb7-11a1610a86a0
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should ensure that priorities from Sub Counties and Town Councils are identified using the prescribed form Annex 1 of the PDM implementation guideline, and incorporated in the District's budget and work plans to enable alignment of PDM activities for proper implementation.
|
515f827c-cd13-4316-bc1c-b4c99cae10a9
|
2
|
1.4.1 Interviews
I conducted interviews with various stakeholders including; Accounting Officers, PDM focal persons, District Commercial Officers and District Commercial Officers in the LGs. In addition, I interviewed officers from the PDM Secretariat, Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MoFPED), and the Participating Ministries, Departments and Agencies.
|
368f7127-9295-4b7c-868a-aede1a86121c
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should address the issue of no physical location to enable the affected PDM SACCO to obtained funds for the PDM activities. Additionally , consultations with MoLG/MoFPED should be expedited to confirm status of Kanabu Parish.
|
8ca55d82-2aa0-4179-bebe-84cbb1360a05
|
2
|
Recommendations
Accounting Officers should ensure the recruitment of parish chiefs and furnish the right information to MoFPED for release of funds.
PDM Secretariat should assess whether the vacant positions should be filled to enable utilization of the funds.
PDM Secretariat, UBoS, MoICT&NG and MoFPED should fast-track the process of integrating 2024 census results into the PDMIS.
The Ministry of Local Government should roll-over the un-implemented activities from which funds were re-purposed.
|
4451ee28-719a-46d3-af09-d544d22e91f1
|
2
|
The Accounting Officer should;
ensure that the Core implementation team prepares quarterly reports as required by the guidelines.
ensure the core implementation team fully constitutes Parish development committees and induct them on their roles and responsibilities.
liaise with MoFPED to ensure PDM SACCO boards are adequately funded to execute their mandate.
ensure the PDM Boards institute and operationalise sub-committees.
|
06eb25e6-7b07-4b17-a371-8fa84421fc86
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should enhance monitoring of the PDM activities to ensure beneficiaries implement approved and funded activities.
John F.S. Muwanga
AUDITOR GENERAL
28 th December, 2023
|
7594a29c-8fc6-4e35-8ee3-880ad8a04c3c
|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer to engage the PDM secretariat for further guidance on this matter.
|
8fc216ec-62b7-465f-96ae-afccef0a2ded
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officers of MoFPED and MoLG should expedite the reconciliation of the number of parishes to align the budgeting for PDM SACCOs with the number of gazetted and operational parishes/wards.
|
e90b042c-f4a1-4037-90b0-710cd8cc5cfe
|
2
|
7.8 Review of the PDM Governance Structures
The explained, 1 = Accounting that. The explained, 2 = Officer SACCO. the Committees and Sub, 1 = the Committees and Sub. the Committees and Sub, 2 = the Committees and Sub
|
64f791c4-5816-4da6-b47f-d14ca1b99932
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should;
Enhance monitoring of the PDM activities to ensure beneficiaries implementing activities they were funded for.
Recover funds from beneficiaries who did not implement planned activities
John F.S. Muwanga AUDITOR GENERAL
24 th December, 2023
38
39
|
13923658-cd89-4fc9-a8fb-3417852ad9d2
|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer to ensure that priorities from Sub Counties/ Divisions/Town Councils are identified using the prescribed form Annex 1 of the PDM implementation guideline, and incorporated in the MC budget and work plans to enable alignment of PDM activities for proper implementation.
|
4a13b3df-445d-4422-9a3a-3b43951d0e01
|
2
|
Key Recommendations
I advised the Accounting Officers of Makindye Ssabagabo, Kira, Mukono, Nansana, Entebbe and Mityana to;
i) Ensure that enforcement budgets are funded as approved by Council to ensure uninterrupted mobilization and collection activities.
ii) Formulate and operationalize the LST assessment committee to obtain data about persons in gainful employment, self-employed professionals and artisans eligible for LST, using the Local Councils (LCI & LCII). In addition, the Accounting Officer should ensure that no practitioner is allowed to undertake any work within the LG without proof of LST payment.
iii) Develop a training program to equip Town Agents on the basic principles of tax administration to maximize revenue assessment. In addition, the Accounting Officer should engage the MoPS to consider revising the structure to provide for additional Town Agents to support assessment activities.
iv) Engage the MoLG and other key stakeholders to develop a comprehensive database to curb individuals who evade taxes by changing their area of operation.
v) Formulate and operationalize the ERC to obtain data about persons in gainful employment, self-employed professionals and artisans eligible for LST.
vi) Come up with practical strategies on how to obtain data on hotels/lodges and liaise with other stakeholders such as the Local Councils (LC's), Gombolola, Internal Security Organization (GISO) to support the enforcement activities.
vii) Seek clarity from the Attorney General on whether the presidential directive is applicable to municipalities outside the KCCA jurisdiction. In addition, the Ministry of Local Government should engage cabinet on the matter to provide clear guidance;
viii) Engage Council to devise strategies to ensure that adequate revenue is realized to fund mobilization and collection activities.
ix) Expedite the retooling of the revenue department to support the revenue mobilization and collection activities with the support received from GKMA Program.
x) Collaborate with the Councils to come up with strategies aimed at recovering the outstanding arrears. In addition, management should make a comprehensive assessment/revaluation of the outstanding balances to ascertain the collectability
of the arrears and establish the actual position of the outstanding arrears for the MC.
|
9746cc6b-6c47-45c2-8cc7-667e657d4893
|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer engage the PDM secretariat for further guidance in such circumstances.
John F.S. Muwanga AUDITOR GENERAL
ORIGINAL COPY
|
c839f3d6-3f5e-46fc-b876-cb81f7b409c4
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should engage contractors and research on the causes of low turn up of bidders. In addition, PPDA should always be engaged in case of such encounters.
25
|
4cb39ea5-7fb7-49fa-8cb4-20f9fd5ffd03
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should ensure compliance with the issued guidelines for PDM.
|
3a14d37e-b391-4a7b-b2fe-3eab78d65dbe
|
2
|
Recommendation
The PDM Secretariat should revisit the flagship projects so that they are favorable to the District.
John F.S. Muwanga AUDITOR GENERAL
28 th December, 2023
37
|
55bc5bd7-4d4d-4ffe-b3de-d825a869758f
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should enhance monitoring of the PDM activities to ensure beneficiaries are complying with the PDM requirements. In addition, he should seek clarification from the PDM Secretariat on actions to be taken when a beneficiary deviate from an approved project.
John F.S. Muwanga
AUDITOR GENERAL
28 th December, 2023
32
|
e29b068d-8e84-44ca-8385-933490573210
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should ensure that only qualifying households benefit from the program by conducting a wealth ranking of households.
The Accounting Officer should ensure that all loans given out through the Parish Development Management Information System.
The Accounting Officer should ensure that farming enterprises obtain agricultural insurance policies from UAIS.
John F.S. Muwanga AUDITOR GENERAL
28 th December, 2023
44
|
fe887ddf-6291-4978-af2f-d5548f727bba
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should
Make arrangements to train private sector actors on the operations of the PDM.
make budget provisions to train local households and enterprise groups.
|
f15efa88-f6d9-4390-a6b4-ec3525ed6ba2
|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer to liaise with the PDM Secretariat to have the insurance policy operationalised.
John F.S. Muwanga
|
91baed63-95d4-43d8-8093-e21747c0ec6e
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should strengthen monitoring activities of CPMC to ensure monthly submissions of progress and financial reports to the CDO.
|
81081086-a602-4d30-9c39-745ac1b580a5
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officers of LGs to engage the PDM secretariat to ensure that the SACCOs are registered as per requirements of the cooperative Act.
|
0e8ccb2c-e023-430a-b7a6-f0670e781b0c
|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer to ensure that all the PDM SACCO, beneficiaries Implement projects they applied for and loans are disbursed in accordance with the PDM guidelines.
John F.S. Muwanga AUDITOR GENERAL
20 th December, 2023
36
|
3f39226b-249b-480c-b9cd-047f55a891dc
|
2
|
Recommendations
MoFPED to ensure that all participating banks are integrated on the Wendi Platform as per the Cabinet directive. In addition, MoFPED should ensure that Post Bank increases the country-wide agency coverage of the Wendi mobile application platform.
Accounting Officers of LGs and KCCA must ensure that PDM SACCOs and members are on-boarded on the Wendi platform.
The PDM SACCO executive should ensure that payments to beneficiaries are made through the SACCOs' mobile wallet.
|
e7d8c922-24f7-4b66-81c1-3d29fb237e80
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should follow up this matter with the Ministry of Local government so that the unfunded parishes are considered in the subsequent financial years. Furthermore, the Accounting Officer MoLG should be notified of the unfunded parishes.
Paragraph 21 of PDM A Local Government (LG) Guide for Supporting Households & Enterprise, Jan 2023; Paragraph 4.1 of the Governance and administration Pillar Operations Manual, February 2022; Paragraph 2.6.4, 3.0 of the PDM User handbook for PRF under Pillar 3, version 22nd October; Paragraph 15 of the PDM Local Government guide to convening the first General Meetings for Registered PDM SACCOs (Guide No.1/2022) of October 2022; Section 18 of the Cooperatives Societies Act 2020; and Paragraph 91 of the Parish Development Model, Guide 2 require that;
|
8c69e399-d15e-44fd-9675-ed0e91db2538
|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer to ensure that priorities from Sub Counties/ Divisions/Town Councils are identified using the prescribed form Annex 1 of the PDM implementation guideline, and incorporated in the MC budget and work plans to enable alignment of PDM activities for proper implementation.
26
|
502a63b7-de6b-4f3f-a822-d854f40f0900
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should;
ensure that PDCs are sensitized on their role of preparing priorities and action plans.
Ensure the PDM Boards operationalise utilization of expression of interest forms by candidates interest in being elected to the board.
ensure the PDM Boards institute and operationalise sub-committees.
|
1bfcb31c-2d6d-479c-8b9a-17dd52033718
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should ensure that PDM HLG core implementation team is fully constituted and functional.
|
cff135ea-adb0-4a12-91aa-2c1bff1885e1
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should ensure that the PDM HLG core adequately prepares and submits Quarterly performance reports for proper accountability.
|
4fca12f9-c4d2-4b83-9827-86f73c1962af
|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer to ensure that priorities from Sub Counties/Town Councils are identified using the prescribed form Annex 1 of the PDM implementation guideline; and incorporated in the district budget and work plans to enable alignment of PDM activities for proper implementation.
|
accb2c2e-91ac-455a-ab7f-af3369cc3ece
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer should;
Liaise with MoFPED to ensure PDM SACCO boards are adequately funded to execute their mandate.
Ensure the PDM Boards institute and operationalise sub-committees.
|
b1e99099-976b-4f3f-9876-3a4f66b0ba0b
|
2
|
Recommendation
The Accounting Officer was commended for ensuring that no PDM SACCO receives all its PRF in the last quarter of the year.
|
6be47dce-aa89-4332-85bb-9d3bc1570b76
|
2
|
Recommendation
I advised the Accounting Officer to ensure that priorities from Sub Counties/ Divisions/Town Councils are identified using the prescribed form Annex 1 of the PDM implementation guideline, and incorporated in the MC budget and work plans to enable alignment of PDM activities for proper implementation.
|
a8978fba-5b8c-4735-9083-c1b9b315a54b
|
2
|
Recommendation
The PDM Secretariat should provide guidance in such circumstances and amend the guidelines where necessary to allow for flexibility in the allocation criteria.
|
c25d139a-7ecf-47f6-aea9-34d14e775295
|
3
|
Appendix 41: Wealth Ranking of Households
Hoima DLG, 1 = KATEREIGABUHANIKA. 41. Hoima DLG, 2 = KATEREIGABUHANIKA PDM SACCO. 41. Hoima DLG, 3 = Bull fattening. 41. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. 42. Hoima DLG, 1 = KIKEREGE. 42. Hoima DLG, 2 = KIKEREGE BUHANIKA PDM SACCO. 42. Hoima DLG, 3 = Beans. 42. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. 43. Hoima DLG, 1 = CENTRAL. 43. Hoima DLG, 2 = CENTRAL BULINDI PDM SACCO. 43. Hoima DLG, 3 = Beans. 43. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. 44. Hoima DLG, 1 = KIBAIREBULINDI. 44. Hoima DLG, 2 = KIBAIREBULINDI PDM SACCO. 44. Hoima DLG, 3 = Beans, Tomatoes. 44. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. 45. Hoima DLG, 1 = KAKINDOBULINDI. 45. Hoima DLG, 2 = KAKINDOBULINDI PDM SACCO. 45. Hoima DLG, 3 = Beans. 45. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. 46. Hoima DLG, 1 = KARUNGU. 46. Hoima DLG, 2 = KARUNGU KIGOROBYA PDM SACCO. 46. Hoima DLG, 3 = Beans. 46. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. 47. Hoima DLG, 1 = KYABISAGAZI. 47. Hoima DLG, 2 = KYABISAGAZI KIGOROBYA PDM SACCO. 47. Hoima DLG, 3 = Beans. 47. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. 48. Hoima DLG, 1 = KIBUGUBYAKYABIGAMBIR E. 48. Hoima DLG, 2 = KIBUGUBYAKYABIGAMBIRE PDM SACCO. 48. Hoima DLG, 3 = Beans, Groundnuts. 48.
|
7352c948-f504-4fbc-9957-9653db00e5a1
|
3
|
Appendix VIII: Different_curricula used by schools
Primary school. 24, Status = Old curriculum. 25, School = Buzenga Pri School. 25, Status = Old curriculum. 26, School = Junction Pri School. 26, Status = Old curriculum. 27, School = Rukungiri Pri School. 27, Status = Old curriculum. 28, School = St. Francis Primary school. 28, Status = Old Curriculum. 29, School = Amusia Primary School. 29, Status = Old Curriculum. 30, School = Kayunga Mixed Primary School. 30, Status = Old Curriculum. 31, School = Kayunga Girls Primary School. 31, Status = Old Curriculum. 32, School = Nankulyaku Primary School. 32, Status = Old Curriculum. 33, School = Asuru Primary school. 33, Status = Old Curriculum. 34, School = Bigando Primary school. 34, Status = Old Curriculum. 35, School = Bugema C.O.U Primary school. 35, Status = Old Curriculum. 36, School = Bukasa R/C Primary school. 36, Status = Old Curriculum. 37, School = Got Lembe Primary school. 37, Status = Old Curriculum. 38, School = Kabalye settlement primary school. 38, Status = Old Curriculum. 39, School = Katasenywa Primary school. 39, Status = Old Curriculum. 40, School = Kyakatono Primary school. 40, Status = Old Curriculum
|
04b3a927-a66d-4906-b798-32b42b08a3cf
|
3
|
Appendix 4 (c): Failure to carry out Wealth ranking of households
Villages = 12. 6., No. Of Villages Were Wealth Ranking Carried Out = 0. 6., Remarks = Parish Chief Not Guided And Sensitized On Wealth Ranking Activity. 7., Vote Name = Apac Dlg. 7., Parish Name Was Out Level? = Aketo. 7., Wealth Ranking Carried At Parish = No. 7., No. Of Villages = 5. 7., No. Of Villages Were Wealth Ranking Carried Out = 0. 7., Remarks = Parish Chief Not Guided And Sensitized On Wealth Ranking Activity. 8., Vote Name = Apac Dlg. 8., Parish Name Was Out Level? = Ayago. 8., Wealth Ranking Carried At Parish = No. 8., No. Of Villages = . 8., No. Of Villages Were Wealth Ranking Carried Out = 0. 8., Remarks = Parish Chief Not Guided And Sensitized On Wealth Ranking Activity
|
8457fe66-4c65-4971-93e2-0cac806ee11c
|
3
|
Appendix 12: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
, 1 = PDM SACCO. , 2 = . , 3 = . , 4 = . , 5 = . , 6 = . , 7 = . , 8 = . NYARWIMUK A, 1 = NYARWIMUKA - RUHINDA PDM SACCO. NYARWIMUK A, 2 = Coffee,Piggery,Rice. NYARWIMUK A, 3 = . NYARWIMUK A, 4 = 13. NYARWIMUK A, 5 = 13. NYARWIMUK A, 6 = 13. NYARWIMUK A, 7 = 7. NYARWIMUK A, 8 = 6. RWAMUGOMA, 1 = RWAMUGOMA - RUHINDA. RWAMUGOMA, 2 = Coffee,Bananas,Piggery,Tomat oes. RWAMUGOMA, 3 = . RWAMUGOMA, 4 = 20. RWAMUGOMA, 5 = 20. RWAMUGOMA, 6 = 20. RWAMUGOMA, 7 = 17. RWAMUGOMA, 8 = 3. BIGAGA WARD, 1 = BIGAGA - RWERERE T/C. BIGAGA WARD, 2 = Coffee,Bananas,Goats,Piggery, Poultry. BIGAGA WARD, 3 = . BIGAGA WARD, 4 = 13. BIGAGA WARD, 5 = 13. BIGAGA WARD, 6 = 13. BIGAGA WARD, 7 = 11. BIGAGA WARD, 8 = 2. KAGUGU WARD, 1 = PDM SACCO KAGUGU - RWERERE T/C PDM SACCO. KAGUGU WARD, 2 = Coffee,Bananas, Fish,Poultry. KAGUGU WARD, 3 = . KAGUGU WARD, 4 = 5. KAGUGU WARD, 5 = 5. KAGUGU WARD, 6 = 5. KAGUGU WARD, 7 = 3. KAGUGU WARD, 8 = 2. RUSOROZA WARD, 1 = RUSOROZA - RWERERE T/C
|
01c3895b-5303-4e03-b9d2-f22a7a4b8cd4
|
3
|
Appendix 9: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
code = 858. 75, Entity Name = Kayunga DLG. 75, Total sample of parishes = 10. 75, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = 0. 75, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = 10. 75, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 75, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = 10. 76, Vote code = 859. 76, Entity Name = Kazo DLG. 76, Total sample of parishes = 10. 76, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = 0. 76, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = 10. 76, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 76, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = 10. 77, Vote code = 860. 77, Entity Name = Kibale DLG. 77, Total sample of parishes = 10. 77, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 77, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = -. 77, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 77, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 78, Vote code = 861. 78, Entity Name = Kiboga DLG. 78, Total sample of parishes = 10. 78, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 78, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = 10. 78, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 78, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 79, Vote code = 862. 79, Entity Name = Kibuku DLG. 79, Total sample of parishes = 10. 79, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 79, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4
|
bd1f8fee-5649-4fe3-a2a6-3d71ab9f140c
|
3
|
Appendix 20: Failure to carry out Wealth ranking of households
1., Vote Name = OMORO DLG. 1., Parish Name = LANENOBER PDM SACCO. 1., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 1., No. of villages = 9. 1., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 1., Remarks = No evidence availed. 2., Vote Name = OMORO DLG. 2., Parish Name = TEOPOK PDM SACCO. 2., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 2., No. of villages = 8. 2., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 2., Remarks = No evidence availed. 3., Vote Name = OMORO DLG. 3., Parish Name = ABIGEDI PDM SACCO. 3., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 3., No. of villages = 8. 3., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 3., Remarks = No evidence availed. 4., Vote Name = OMORO DLG. 4., Parish Name = LAPAINAT EAST PDM
|
f39bdaed-99cf-46b6-b0c0-384c88e3c576
|
3
|
Appendix 41: Wealth Ranking of Households
1., Vote name = Hoima DLG. 1., Parish Name = Kisabagwa. 1., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 1., No. of villages = 14. 1., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 00. 2., Vote name = Hoima DLG. 2., Parish Name = Kibugubya. 2., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 2., No. of villages = 13. 2., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 00. 3., Vote name = Hoima DLG. 3., Parish Name = Busanga. 3., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 3., No. of villages = 5. 3., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 00. 4., Vote name = Hoima DLG. 4., Parish Name = Buraru. 4., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 4., No. of villages = 9. 4., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 00. 5., Vote name = Hoima DLG. 5., Parish Name = Kyabanati. 5., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 5., No. of villages = 8. 5., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 00. 6., Vote name = Hoima DLG. 6., Parish Name = Buyanja. 6., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 6., No. of villages = 7. 6., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 00. 7., Vote name = Hoima DLG. 7., Parish Name = Kakindo. 7., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 7., No. of villages = 4. 7., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 00. 8., Vote name = Hoima DLG. 8., Parish Name = Central. 8., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 8., No. of villages = 5. 8., No. of villages were wealth ranking
|
70213d60-f660-47d5-9ef2-658b54372f1a
|
3
|
Appendix 5 (j); Irregularities in project implementation
SACCO records = 1,000,000. , Loan Amount as per household evidence = 1,000,000. , Project funded = COFFEE. , Status of the project = . , Remark = Project exists
81
9, = Kyenjojo DLG. 9, = Kabatooro Parish. 9, = KABATOORO- NYAKISI S/C PDM SACCO. 9, MUGISA JAMES = KASEMIRO PHIONA. 9, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 9, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 9, MAIZE = POULTRY. 9, Project exists = Project exists. , = . , = . , = . , MUGISA JAMES = MUGISA ERICA NJERU. , 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. , 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. , MAIZE = COFFEE. , Project exists = Project exists. 10, = Kyenjojo DLG. 10, = Kinogero Parish. 10, = KINOGERO- KATOOKE S/C PDM SACCO. 10, MUGISA JAMES = MBABAZI RESTY. 10, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 10, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 10, MAIZE = MAIZE. 10, Project exists = Project exists. , = . , = . , = . , MUGISA JAMES = SABIITI MOSES. , 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. , 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. , MAIZE = COFFEE. , Project exists = Project exists
|
bdfb14fa-4afa-456c-8b7f-c46702b281b1
|
3
|
Appendix 5 (d): Selection and Implementation of Prioritized/Flagship Projects
1., = Alebtong DLG. 1., = Akwangkel. 1., = Akwangkel Aloi PDM SACCO. 1., = Goat rearing, Poultry, Maize, Oil, Piggery. 1., commoditie s selected by the LG? = No. 1., flagship projects = 4. 1., = 19. 1., = 19. 1., commodity list = 4. 2., = Alebtong DLG. 2., = Alal Ward. 2., = Alal Ward Aloi Town Council PDM SACCO. 2., = Piggery, Cattle Keeping, Goat rearing. 2., commoditie s selected by the LG? = Yes. 2., flagship projects = 21. 2., = 23. 2., = 23. 2., commodity list = 21. 3., = Alebtong DLG. 3., = Alebtong. 3., = Alebtong Aloi PDM SACCO. 3., = Fish, Goat rearing, Poultry, Vegetable, cattle rearing. 3., commoditie s selected by the LG? = No. 3., flagship projects = 10. 3., = 22. 3., = 22. 3., commodity list = 10. 4., = Alebtong DLG. 4., = Alyec Ward. 4., = Alyec Ward Alebtong Town Council PDM SACCO. 4., = Cassava, Maize, Sunflower, Soya bean. 4., commoditie s selected by the LG? = No. 4., flagship projects = 1. 4., = 17. 4., = 17. 4., commodity list = 1. 5., = Alebtong DLG. 5., = Amononeno. 5., = Amononeno Abako PDM SACCO Piggery. 5., = Sheep rearing, Goats rearing,. 5., commoditie s selected by the LG? = No. 5., flagship projects = 2. 5., = 17. 5., = 17. 5., commodity list = 2. 6., = Alebtong DLG. 6., = Anara. 6., = Anara Aloi PDM SACCO Maize. 6., = Sunflower, Soya Bean, Bee keeping,. 6., commoditie s selected
|
8cf6e5b1-0a38-42d2-b386-428ea27cfd43
|
3
|
Appendix: 7 Implementation of Ineligible, and Non-Existent Projects
1, Vote code.Vote code. = 602. 1, Entity Name.Entity Name. = Fortportal City. 1, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects.Appendix 7(a) = 2. 1, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects.Appendix 7(a) = 2. 1, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects.No. of beneficiaries that had non-existent projects..Appendix 7(b) = 0. 1, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had non- existent projects..Appendix 7(b) = 0. 2, Vote code.Vote code. = 604. 2, Entity Name.Entity Name. = Hoima city. 2, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects.Appendix 7(a) = 4. 2, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects.Appendix 7(a) = 2. 2, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects.No. of beneficiaries that had non-existent projects..Appendix 7(b) = 2. 2, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had non- existent projects..Appendix 7(b) = 2. 3, Vote code.Vote code. = 605. 3, Entity Name.Entity Name. = Jinja City. 3, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects.Appendix 7(a) = 3. 3, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects.Appendix 7(a) = 3. 3, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects.No. of beneficiaries that had non-existent
|
c3749761-4a7d-4268-9989-22a0e10101c6
|
3
|
Appendix 7g: Selection and implementation of prioritized/flagship projects
1., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 1., Parish Name = Muyenga. 1., Name of SACCO = Muyenga - Nyabbani PDM SACCO. 1., List of flagship projects per SACCO = - - - - -. 1., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Coffee Poultry Onion Banana Beans. 1., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 1., How many enterpris es are impleme nting flagship projects = 2. 1., Number of PDM enterprises = 5. 1., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 5. 1., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 2. 2., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 2., Parish Name = Nyabbani. 2., Name of SACCO = Nyabbani - Nyabbani PDM
|
c9493b08-7aa1-4adc-b1f6-7e81fa41de7e
|
3
|
Appendix 19: Enterprise/households implemented projects that are not from the priority commodity list
Maize growing, Poultry keeping, Beans. 7, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected = No. 7, How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 4. 7, Number of PDM enterprise s = 13. 7, How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 13. 7, How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit = 4. 8, Vote Name = Kywankwanz i DLG. 8, Parish Name = Nakitemb e Ward. 8, Name of SACCO = Nakitembe Ward- Wattuba PDM. 8, List of flagship projects per SACCO = rearing Maize, Piggery, Coffee, Poultry. 8, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected = No. 8, How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 7. 8, Number of PDM enterprise s = 9. 8, How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 9. 8, How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit = 7. 9, Vote Name = Kywankwanz i DLG. 9, Parish Name = Kisolooza Parish. 9, Name of SACCO = SACCO Kisolooza- Wattuba PDM SACCO. 9, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Beans, Maize, Coffee, Poultry,. 9, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected = No. 9, How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 3. 9, Number of PDM enterprise s = 8. 9, How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 8. 9, How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit = 3
32
|
f82c5056-2eb9-4751-a00d-14104202af85
|
3
|
Appendix 15: Parishes that selected flagship projects that were inconsistent with the LG selected priority commodities
Appendix 16: Farmer enterprise/households implemented projects that are not from the priority commodity list
BULIMA. 0, Name of PRF beneficiary = Asiimwe Hashim Annet. 0, Was the benefici ary from the approve d PDM enterpri se = Yes Yes. 0, Date loan was obtain ed = 05/10/2 023 24/07/2. 0, Loan Amount = 1,000,000 1,000,000. 0, Were the loan benef iciari es select ed throu gh the PDMI = Yes Yes. 0, Were they vetted by a village meeting convene d by the enterpri se groups = Yes Yes. 0, Remarks = approved through PDMS The loan was approved. 1 2, Vote Name = DLG 1 Masindi DLG. 1 2, Parish Name = ward Kisalizi ward. 1 2, Name of SACCO = PDM SACCO KISALIZI BULIMA
|
6607add8-ada8-4207-ad6c-6814021e0771
|
3
|
Appendix 16 ; Selection and Implementation of Prioritized/Flagship Projects
Lokung. 4, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sim sim,Soya beans,Maize,piggery,sunflower. 4, Are the flagship projects consiste nt with the priority commo dities selecte d by the LG? = NO. 4, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 26. 4, Number of PDM enterprises = 26. 4, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 26. 4, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 26. 5, Vote Name = . 5, Parish Name = Kamama. 5, Name of SACCO = Kamama Padibe Town Council. 5, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sim sim,Soya beans,Maize,piggery,sunflower. 5, Are the flagship projects consiste nt with the priority commo dities selecte d by the LG? = NO. 5, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = Information not availed during audit. 5, Number of PDM enterprises = Information not availed during audit. 5, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = Information not availed during audit. 5, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = Information not availed during audit. 7, Vote Name = . 7, Parish Name = Kuluyee. 7, Name of SACCO = Kuluyee Padibe Town Council. 7, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sim sim,Soya beans,Maize,piggery,sunflower. 7, Are the flagship projects consiste nt with the priority commo dities selecte d by the LG? = NO. 7, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 16. 7, Number of PDM enterprises = 16. 7, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 16. 7, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 16. 8, Vote Name = . 8, Parish Name = Madi-Kiloc. 8, Name of SACCO = Madi-Kiloc Padibe
|
b593ce19-d38e-4b5b-a14f-46e20b466f87
|
3
|
priority commodities
24, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 24, Kiryamusunku Parish = Buguluma Parish. 24, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Buguluma- Byerima PDM SACCO. 24, Piggery, Beans, = Beans, Poultry, Piggery. 24, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 25, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 25, Kiryamusunku Parish = Kamukanga Parish. 25, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Kamukanga- Byerimma PDM SACCO. 25, Piggery, Beans, = Beans, Rice, Poultry,. 25, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 26, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 26, Kiryamusunku Parish = Nabweyo Parish. 26, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Nabweyo- Kyankwanzi PDM SACCO. 26, Piggery, Beans, = Poultry,. 26, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 27, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 27, Kiryamusunku Parish = Mpango Parish. 27, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Mpango- Kyankwanzi PDM SACCO. 27, Piggery, Beans, = Poultry. 27, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 28, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 28, Kiryamusunku Parish = Lubiri Parish. 28, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Lubiri-Kyankwanzi PDM SACCO. 28, Piggery, Beans, = Poultry, Vegetables, Beans, Piggery,. 28, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 29, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 29, Kiryamusunku Parish = Banda Parish. 29, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Banda-Banda PDM SACCO. 29, Piggery, Beans, = Piggery. 29, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 30, Kyankwanzi
|
5616d24a-06c7-44f5-9fa1-a7fea65dbe02
|
3
|
Appendix 14: Selection and Implementation of Prioritized/Flagship Projects
1., Vote Name = Kasese DLG. 1., Parish Name = Muhumuza. 1., Name of SACCO = Muhumuza- Buhuhira PDM SACCO. 1., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Coffee, Banana, Poultry. 1., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 1., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 21. 1., Number of PDM enterprises = 21. 1., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 21. 1., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 18. 2., Vote Name = Kasese DLG. 2., Parish Name = Kitswamba Central. 2., Name of SACCO = Kitswamba Central -Kitswamba Town Council PDM SACCO. 2., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Coffee, Maize, Beans, Tomatoes, Poultry, Piggery, Dairy Cattle,. 2., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 2., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 11. 2., Number of PDM enterprises = 11. 2., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 11. 2., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 6. 3., Vote Name = Kasese DLG. 3., Parish Name = Rugendabara. 3., Name of SACCO = Rugendabara - Kitswamba PDM SACCO. 3., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Fish. Maize, Soya beans, Sorghum, Goat rearing, Cattle keeping. 3., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 3., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 0. 3., Number of PDM enterprises = 16. 3., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 16. 3., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 10. 4., Vote Name = Kasese
|
2b1a2afb-1bfd-44a0-b51f-588134a148a5
|
3
|
Appendix 1Z: Selection and Implementation of PrioritizedLFlagship Projects
7, NAP = AK DLG. 7, = LOPIIDA WARD. 7, = LOPIIDA WARD. 7, gram growing piggery, vegetabl e and nursery growing, maize, sunflow er = Buying and selling of cereals, poultry keeping, piggery and tree. 7, = NO. 7, = 9. 7, = 15. 7, = 9. 7, = 9. 8, NAP = NAP AK DLG. 8, = NASIKE WARD. 8, = NASIKE WARD. 8, gram growing piggery, vegetabl e and nursery growing, maize, sunflow er = grain milling Bee keeping, sun flower , livestock dealers, poultry and. 8, = NO. 8, = . 8, = 11. 8, = . 8, = . 9, NAP = NAP AK DLG. 9, = SENIOR QUARTER S WARD. 9, = SENIOR QUARTER S WARD. 9, gram growing piggery, vegetabl e and nursery growing, maize, sunflow er = banking and piggery Buying and selling of cereals, green gram, groundn uts, sim- sim and. 9, = NO. 9, = 10. 9, = 11. 9, = 10. 9, = 10. 10., NAP = NAP AK DLG. 10., = COMPLEX WARD. 10., = COMPLEX WARD. 10., gram growing piggery, vegetabl e and nursery growing, maize, sunflow er = poultry keepers Buying and selling of cereals, poultry keeping, vegetabl. 10., = NO. 10., = 10. 10., = . 10., = 10. 10., = 10
48
111
97
50
|
57d160b5-56aa-4752-a782-ab139d8b4597
|
3
|
Fraudulent evaluation of bids
vi, 1 = . vi, 2 = Supply of 1,950 passion fruits to production department ,771 mango tree seedlings to Patiko sub county,under PMG and DDEG Funding. vi, 3 = rates. vi, 4 = subsequent bid opening. Various While the evaluation report listed 4 firms that responded, only 2 were evaluated i.e. Amlo Holdings Ltd & Ibinoga Construction & General Merchandise. Latong & Sons Co. Ltd and Alabama Crown Ltd were not evaluated.. vi, 5 = vi. , 1 = Construction fish pond Agonga Bungatira county. , 2 = of in Parish, sub-. , 3 = 22,800,000. , 4 = record of receipt had 3 firms however only one firm was evaluated i.e. Stanhope Construction And General Merchandise Ltd. AKA Construction and Ibinonga construction & general merchandise were not. , 5 = vii. , 1 = Deep borehole apron casting and hand installation boreholes Awach, Paicho, Unyama, Patiko, Bungantira and Palaro sub-county viii Deep borehole drilling of. , 2 = pump of 7 in 7. , 3 = 41,468,000 85,904,000. , 4 = Whereas 2 bids were received only one i.e. that of Balcon Engineering Ltd was evaluated& the one of Agola Enterprises Ltd not evaluated. Whereas bids from PMP Holdings Ltd & BM Watsan. , 5 = vii
38
Awach, Paicho, Bungatira, Unyama , Patiko & Palaro Sub- Counties, 1 = bids were not received from these firms. A bid was received from Geobot Water Engineering Services but not evaluated.
39
|
ed80fa24-279e-421e-a61b-ac5b3d57dd7f
|
3
|
Appendix 11: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
1., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 1., Parish Name = Magoma. 1., Name of SACCO = Magoma PDM SACCO. 1., List of flagship projects per SACCO = None. 1., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = N/A. 1., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = . 1., Number of PDM enterprises = 24. 1., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 20. 1., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = . 2., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 2., Parish Name = Katuugo. 2., Name of SACCO = Katuugo PDM SACCO. 2., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Bull Fattening. 2., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 2., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = . 2., Number of PDM enterprises = 20. 2., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 23. 2., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = . 3., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 3., Parish Name = Ngoma North Ward. 3., Name of SACCO = Ngoma North Ward PDM SACCO. 3., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Bull Fattening. 3., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 3., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 11. 3., Number of PDM enterprises = 23. 3., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 33. 3., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = . 4., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 4., Parish Name = Mpwedde. 4., Name of SACCO = Mpwedde PDM SACCO. 4., List of flagship projects per SACCO = None. 4., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected
|
3cf9c28b-d6de-404a-8101-23065bd1d03e
|
3
|
Appendix 16: Wealth Ranking of Households
done. 7., Vote Name = NAPAK DLG. 7., Parish Name = LOPIIDA WARD. 7., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = NO. 7., No. of villages = 5. 7., No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 7., Remarks = No wealth ranking carried out. No record of work done. 8., Vote Name = NAPAK DLG. 8., Parish Name = NASIKE WARD. 8., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = NO. 8., No. of villages = 3. 8., No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 8., Remarks = No wealth ranking carried out. No record of work done. 9., Vote Name = NAPAK DLG. 9., Parish Name = SENIOR QUARTERS WARD. 9., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = NO. 9., No. of villages = 5. 9., No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 9., Remarks = No wealth ranking carried out. No record of work done. 10., Vote Name = NAPAK DLG. 10., Parish Name = COMPLEX WARD. 10., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = NO. 10., No. of villages = 3. 10., No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 10., Remarks = No wealth ranking carried out. No record of work done. , Vote Name = . , Parish Name = . , Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = . , No. of villages = 54. , No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. , Remarks =
|
dd982df1-ace2-4140-b96f-b51ad21dad60
|
3
|
Appendix 11: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
list = . 8., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 8., Parish Name = Bwetagiro. 8., Name of SACCO = Bwetagiro PDM SACCO. 8., List of flagship projects per SACCO = None. 8., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = N/A. 8., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = . 8., Number of PDM enterprises = 10. 8., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 30. 8., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = . 9., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 9., Parish Name = Kasambya. 9., Name of SACCO = Kasambya PDM SACCO. 9., List of flagship projects per SACCO = None. 9., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = N/A. 9., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = . 9., Number of PDM enterprises = 30. 9., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 26. 9., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = . 10., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 10., Parish Name = Kivumu. 10., Name of SACCO = Kivumu Kito PDM SACCO. 10., List of flagship projects per SACCO = None. 10., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = N/A. 10., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = . 10., Number of PDM enterprises = 26. 10., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 20. 10., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list =
56
|
7f799748-533d-4b5d-880a-4a25a87ff709
|
3
|
4.5.8.1 Project implementation
4., RUKI GA DLG = RUKI GA DLG. 4., Kasheky e Parish = Kibanda Parish. 4., KASHEKY E - KAMWEZI PDM SACCO = KIBANDA - KAMWEZI PDM SACCO. 4., Mujunansi Innocent Ampeire Lydia = Karegyey a Didas Kyomuka ma Kate. 4., 100,000, 000 = 100,000, 000. 4., 1,000,0 00 @ each = 1,000,0 00 @ each. 4., Coffe e = Onion s. 4., All beneficia ries have existenc e projects = All beneficia ries have existenc e projects. 5., RUKI GA DLG = RUKI GA DLG. 5., Kasheky e Parish = Nyarura mbi parish. 5., KASHEKY E - KAMWEZI PDM SACCO = NYARURA MBI - RWAMUC UCU PDM SACCO. 5., Mujunansi Innocent Ampeire Lydia = Mugisha Joram Mwesigw a Jolly. 5., 100,000, 000 = 100,000, 000. 5., 1,000,0 00 @ each = 1,000,0 00 @ each. 5., Coffe e = Beans. 5., All beneficia ries have existenc e projects = All beneficia ries have existenc e projects
John F.S. Muwanga AUDITOR GENERAL
28 th December, 2023
32
|
cb389568-f017-4eb0-8c4a-21775f6fdd21
|
3
|
Appendix 41: Wealth Ranking of Households
Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. 49. Hoima DLG, 1 = KISABAGWA. 49. Hoima DLG, 2 = KISABAGWA KYABIGAMBIRE PDM SACCO. 49. Hoima DLG, 3 = Goats, Groundnuts, Beans. 49. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. , 1 = SOUTH. , 2 = SOUTH EASTKIGOROBYA PDM SACCO. , 3 = Groundnuts, Poultry. , 4 = 100,000,000. 51. Hoima DLG, 1 = . 51. Hoima DLG, 2 = . 51. Hoima DLG, 3 = . 51. Hoima DLG, 4 = . 52. Hoima DLG, 1 = SOUTH. 52. Hoima DLG, 2 = SOUTH WEST KIGOROBYA PDM SACCO. 52. Hoima DLG, 3 = Poultry. 52. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. 53. Hoima DLG, 1 = NORTHERN. 53. Hoima DLG, 2 = NORTHERN KIGOROBYA PDM SACCO. 53. Hoima DLG, 3 = Poultry, Beans. 53. Hoima DLG, 4 = 100,000,000. Total, 1 = . Total, 2 = . Total, 3 = . Total, 4 =
176
Appendix 43: Households that did not implement items from the priority list
|
de32ff0a-3185-4d6c-8500-6c9562ff3e1e
|
3
|
Appendix 7: wealth ranking of households
SN, 1 = Vote Name. SN, 2 = Parish Name. SN, 3 = Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level?. SN, 4 = No. of villages. SN, 5 = No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out. 1., 1 = Lira. 1., 2 = Orit. 1., 3 = Yes. 1., 4 = 18. 1., 5 = 0
45
Lira, Lira = Otara. Lira, Agweng Ward = Yes. Lira, Yes = 24. Lira, 13 = 0. Lira, 0 = 3.. Lira, Lira = Acutkumu. Lira, Agweng Ward = Yes. Lira, Yes = 20. Lira, 13 = 0. Lira, 0 = 4.. Lira, Lira = Ogur. Lira, Agweng Ward = Yes. Lira, Yes = 09. Lira, 13 = 0. Lira, 0 = 5.. Lira, Lira = Alworo. Lira, Agweng Ward = Yes. Lira, Yes = 08. Lira, 13 = 0. Lira, 0 = 6.. Lira, Lira = Onyakede. Lira, Agweng Ward = Yes. Lira, Yes = 11. Lira, 13 = 0. Lira, 0 = 7.. Lira, Lira = Obot. Lira, Agweng Ward = Yes. Lira, Yes = 09. Lira, 13 = 0. Lira, 0 = 8.. Lira, Lira = Olilo. Lira, Agweng Ward = Yes. Lira, Yes = 10. Lira, 13 = 0. Lira, 0 = 9.. Lira, Lira = Abutoadi. Lira, Agweng Ward = Yes. Lira, Yes = 07. Lira, 13 = 0. Lira, 0 = 10.
|
8b7ab305-787e-4fc0-a1c8-9e65d139b328
|
3
|
Appendix 13: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
1., Vote Name = Kalaki DLG. 1., Parish Name = Opiltok. 1., Name of SACCO = Opiltok Otuboi Pdm Sacco. 1., List of flagship projects per SACCO = 1 Goat rearing, 1 Sunflower growing, 1 Green Grams, 1 Sheep rearing, 1 Soya Beans growing. 1., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 1., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 5. 1., Number of PDM enterprises = 11. 1., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 3. 1., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 0. 2., Vote Name = Kalaki DLG. 2., Parish Name = Amoru. 2., Name of SACCO = Amoru Otuboi Pdm Sacco. 2., List of flagship projects per SACCO = 1 Soya bean growing, 1 Goat rearing, 1 Maize growing, 1 Sunflower growing, 1 Sheep rearing, 1 Cassava growing, 1 Piggery. 2., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 2., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 7. 2., Number of PDM enterprises = 11. 2., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 3. 2., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 3. 3., Vote Name = Kalaki DLG. 3., Parish Name = Lwala. 3., Name of SACCO = Lwala Otuboi Pdm Sacco. 3., List of flagship projects per SACCO = 1 Sunflower growing, 1 Sheep rearing, 1 Goat rearing, 1 Groundnuts growing, 1 Soya growing, 1. 3., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 3., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 7. 3., Number of PDM enterprises = 7. 3., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 4. 3., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority
|
5fda4765-6b75-4c04-998e-4473b85c876d
|
3
|
Appendix 9: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
82, Vote code = 868. 82, Entity Name = Kitgum DLG. 82, Total sample of parishes = 10. 82, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = 0. 82, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = 0. 82, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 82, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = 0. 83, Vote code = 869. 83, Entity Name = Koboko DLG. 83, Total sample of parishes = 10. 83, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 83, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = -. 83, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = -. 83, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 84, Vote code = 870. 84, Entity Name = Kole DLG. 84, Total sample of parishes = 10. 84, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = 0. 84, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = 9. 84, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 84, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = 3. 85, Vote code = 871. 85, Entity Name = Kotido DLG. 85, Total sample of parishes = 10. 85, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 85, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = 10. 85, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = -. 85, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = 10. 86, Vote code = 872. 86, Entity Name = Kumi DLG. 86, Total sample of parishes = 10. 86, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = 0. 86, No. of
|
513b7460-79c0-4875-93dd-10bb7ec0c7d1
|
3
|
Appendix 19: Enterprise/households implemented projects that are not from the priority commodity list
Ward- Kyankwanz i PDM. 4, List of flagship projects per SACCO = farming Maize, Beef,. 4, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected = Yes. 4, How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 6. 4, Number of PDM enterprise s = 6. 4, How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 6. 4, How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit = 6. 5, Vote Name = Kywankwanz i DLG. 5, Parish Name = Butemba Ward. 5, Name of SACCO = SACCO Butemba Ward- Butemba PDM SACCO. 5, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sweet Potato growing, Maize growing, Beans rowing, G.Nuts growing,. 5, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected = No. 5, How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 4. 5, Number of PDM enterprise s = 13. 5, How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 13. 5, How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit = 4. 6, Vote Name = Kywankwanz i DLG. 6, Parish Name = Ndibata Ward. 6, Name of SACCO = Ndibata Ward- Ntwetwe PDM. 6, List of flagship projects per SACCO = growing Coffee growing, Maize growing,. 6, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected = No. 6, How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 5. 6, Number of PDM enterprise s = 7. 6, How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 7. 6, How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit = 5. 7, Vote Name = Kywankwanz i DLG. 7, Parish Name = Kalagi Ward. 7, Name of SACCO = SACCO Kalagi Ward- Masodde- Kalagi PDM SACCO. 7, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Piggery Piggery,
|
abb5cbee-2e16-40f7-982d-f12849a8bdd9
|
3
|
Appendix 14: Failure to select and implement prioritized / flagship projects
= Hatumb Banja Ward. 30, = Banja Ward Mutumb T/C PDM SACCO. 30, Fish farming Maize Beans Dairy cattle = Cassava Bananas Piggery Poultry. 30, = No. 30, = 18. 30, = . 30, = . 30, = . 31, = Namayingo. 31, = Madowa. 31, = Madowa Buswale PDM SACCO. 31, Fish farming Maize Beans Dairy cattle = Coffee Cassava Piggery Poultry. 31, = No. 31, = 14. 31, = 5. 31, = . 31, = 2. 32, = Namayingo. 32, = Bubango. 32, = Bubango Buswale PDM SACCO. 32, Fish farming Maize Beans Dairy cattle = Beans Cassava Poultry Fish farming Piggery. 32, = No. 32, = 13. 32, = . 32, = 5. 32, = 3. 33, = Namayingo. 33, = Namayu ge. 33, = Namayu ge Buswale PDM. 33, Fish farming Maize Beans Dairy cattle = Coffee Maize Bananas Beans Cassava. 33, = No. 33, = 11. 33, = . 33, = . 33, = . 34, = Namayingo. 34, = Buswale. 34, = SACCO Buswale Buswale PDM. 34, Fish farming Maize Beans Dairy cattle = Piggery Beans Bananas Maize. 34, = No. 34, = 14. 34, = . 34, = . 34, = 3
|
60c23d87-a916-4463-88bc-17075c7eecea
|
3
|
Appendix 28: Parishes with flagship projects inconsistent with Kiryandongo Selected Priority Commodities
projects = Piggery,maize,Goat,soyabean,s unflower. 6., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 7., Name of HLG = Kiryandongo DLG. 7., Parish = Central parish. 7., Name of PDM SACCO = Central-Bweyale. 7., Inconsistent Flagship projects = Maize,beans,poutry, Fish and oil palm buying. 7., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 8., Name of HLG = Kiryandongo DLG. 8., Parish = Northern parish. 8., Name of PDM SACCO = Northern-Bweyale. 8., Inconsistent Flagship projects = Poutry,maize,Beans. 8., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 9., Name of HLG = Kiryandongo DLG. 9., Parish = Kiigya parish. 9., Name of PDM SACCO = Kiigya- Kigumba. 9., Inconsistent Flagship projects = Maize,Poutry,Beans. 9., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. , Name of HLG = 10.
Kiryandongo DLG. , Parish = Kigumba 1 parish. , Name of PDM SACCO = Kigumba 1-kigumba. , Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans,Maize,G/nuts,poutry ,Tomatoes. , Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000
6
Appendix 29: Households that did not implement items from the priority list
|
f9c80ada-3827-4423-8a29-15e8499ac551
|
3
|
Appendix 13: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
1., Vote Name = Bunyangabu DLG. 1., Parish Name = KABAALE KIBIITO. 1., Name of SACCO = KABAALE KIBIITO PDM. 1., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Banana, Irish potatoes selling. 1., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 1., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 14. 1., Number of PDM enterprises = 15. 1., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 14. 1., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 14. 2., Vote Name = Bunyangabu DLG. 2., Parish Name = CENTRAL WARD. 2., Name of SACCO = CENTRAL KIBIITO PDM. 2., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Banana, Piggery, Vegetables. 2., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 2., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 10. 2., Number of PDM enterprises = 11. 2., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 11. 2., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 10
51
|
a293ae1a-bf0e-4bab-99ce-254eedad46e0
|
3
|
Appendix 16 ; Selection and Implementation of Prioritized/Flagship Projects
1., Vote Name = LAMWO. 1., Parish Name = Olebi. 1., Name of SACCO = Olebi Lamwo Town Council. 1., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sim sim,Soya beans,Maize,piggery,sunflower,goats. 1., Are the flagship projects consiste nt with the priority commo dities selecte d by the LG? = NO. 1., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 16. 1., Number of PDM enterprises = 16. 1., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 16. 1., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 16. 2, Vote Name = . 2, Parish Name = Moroto. 2, Name of SACCO = Moroto Palabek Gem. 2, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sim sim,Soya beans,Maize,piggery,sunflower. 2, Are the flagship projects consiste nt with the priority commo dities selecte d by the LG? = NO. 2, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 26. 2, Number of PDM enterprises = 26. 2, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 26. 2, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 26. 3, Vote Name = . 3, Parish Name = Pawor East. 3, Name of SACCO = Pawor East Lokung. 3, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sim sim,Soya beans,Maize,piggery,sunflower. 3, Are the flagship projects consiste nt with the priority commo dities selecte d by the LG? = NO. 3, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 11. 3, Number of PDM enterprises = 11. 3, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 11. 3, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 11. 4, Vote Name = . 4, Parish Name = Pawor West. 4, Name of SACCO = Pawor West
|
27a45a91-a2e7-4128-ae36-f9042c512e0d
|
3
|
Appendix 26: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
SACCO = Goat rearing Fishery Poultry rearing. 4, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 4, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 22. 4, Number of PDM enterprise s = 22. 4, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 22. 4, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 4. 5, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 5, Parish Name = Western ward. 5, Name of SACCO = Western Butiaba PDM Sacco Ltd. 5, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Fishery Poultry Rearing Produce business. 5, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 5, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 19. 5, Number of PDM enterprise s = 19. 5, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 4. 5, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 10. 6, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 6, Parish Name = Kigwera. 6, Name of SACCO = Kigwera Kigwera PDM Sacco Ltd. 6, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Cassava Growing Piggery Poultry rearing Maize growing Fishery. 6, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 6, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 16. 6, Number of PDM enterprise s = 16. 6, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 16. 6, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 11
91
|
478c8b8b-bb7f-48b8-9412-8c4893b135c8
|
3
|
Appendix 27: Failure to carry out Wealth ranking of households
ranking was carried out = N/a. 8., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 8., Parish Name = Northern parish. 8., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 8., No. of villages = N/a. 8., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a. 9., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 9., Parish Name = Kiigya parish. 9., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 9., No. of villages = N/a. 9., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a. 10., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 10., Parish Name = Kigumba 1 parish. 10., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 10., No. of villages = N/a. 10., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a. , Vote name = . , Parish Name = Total. , Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = . , No. of villages = N/a. , No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a
5
|
71d437a2-ba3d-437a-9fe0-8a857eb3b5e2
|
3
|
Appendix 4(d): Failure to carry out wealth ranking of households
1. Amuru DLG, Vote Name = Layik. 1. Amuru DLG, Parish Name = No. 1. Amuru DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 3. 1. Amuru DLG, No. of villages = . 1. Amuru DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 1. Amuru DLG, Remarks = Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level. 2. Amuru DLG, Vote Name = Luzira. 2. Amuru DLG, Parish Name = No. 2. Amuru DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 2. 2. Amuru DLG, No. of villages = . 2. Amuru DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = . 2. Amuru DLG, Remarks = 0 Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level. 3., Vote Name = Amuru DLG Palwong. 3., Parish Name = No. 3., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 8. 3., No. of villages = . 3., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = . 3., Remarks = 0 Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level. 4. Amuru DLG, Vote Name = Palema. 4. Amuru DLG, Parish Name = No. 4. Amuru DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = . 4. Amuru DLG, No. of villages = 6. 4. Amuru DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 4. Amuru DLG, Remarks = Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level. 5. Amuru DLG, Vote Name = Coke. 5. Amuru DLG, Parish Name = No. 5. Amuru DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = . 5. Amuru DLG, No. of villages = 4. 5. Amuru DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = . 5. Amuru DLG, Remarks = 0 Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level. 6. Amuru DLG, Vote
|
3502e3ce-5620-4ac7-b4d0-70bf0081d7ca
|
3
|
Appendix 4: Alignment of LG budgets to the PDM
1., Were priorities received from the Sub Counties/ Division for incorporation in the HLG Budget? (Yes/No) = Yes. 1., Were the priorities incorporated in the HLG Budget? (Yes/No) = Yes. 1., For priorities that are supposed to implemented MDAs; Were communicated to the respective MDAs approval allocation = Yes. 1., be by they for and of Were the priorities to be implemented by MDAs incorporated in the HLG budget? (Yes/No.) = Yes. 1., Remarks = Rwamucucu subcounty. Kilaraka Fort bridge. Grading of Nyungu- Nyakagabagaba raod. Extension of Ibumba GFS. Kamwezi subcounty. Nyakabungo- Nymabare Road (4.5) road. Construction of slaughter slan at Rwamatunguru market.
37
|
c6c33a6a-5bb9-4bee-a5dc-9b2a88ee69b6
|
3
|
Appendix 26: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
1, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 1, Parish Name = Biiso. 1, Name of SACCO = Biiso Biiso PDM Sacco Ltd. 1, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Beans growing Maize growing Piggery. 1, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 1, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 16. 1, Number of PDM enterprise s = 16. 1, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 16. 1, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 0. 2, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 2, Parish Name = Biiso ward. 2, Name of SACCO = Biiso Biiso T/C PDM Sacco. 2, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Poultry Rearing Produce business Piggery Rearing Beans growing. 2, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 2, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 17. 2, Number of PDM enterprise s = 17. 2, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 14. 2, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 0. 3, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 3, Parish Name = Bugana. 3, Name of SACCO = Bugana Buliisa PDM Sacco Ltd. 3, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Cassava Growing Piggery Poultry rearing Maize growing. 3, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 3, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 48. 3, Number of PDM enterprise s = 48. 3, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 40. 3, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 28. 4, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 4, Parish Name = Western ward. 4, Name of SACCO = Western Buliisa PDM Sacco Ltd. 4, List of flagship projects per
|
315a9cff-b416-47f1-967a-3d0aa2d74292
|
3
|
Appendix 7: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
of the the enterpri ses are enterpri ses = 24. 6., farming the priority How many farming enterprises are from commodity list = 0. 7., Parish Name = Akadot. 7., Name of SACCO = Akadot Pallisa. 7., List of flagship projects per SACCO = poultry, Fish, Maize, piggery,. 7., Approved flagship projects = ngoes) Diary and diary products, Fruit enterprise(ma. 7., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected by the LG? = No. 7., How many enterpri ses are implem enting flagship projects = 0. 7., Numb er of PDM enterp rises = 116. 7., How many of of the the enterpri ses are enterpri ses = 20. 7., farming the priority How many farming enterprises are from commodity list = 0. 8., Parish Name = Odwara t. 8., Name of SACCO = Odwarat Olok. 8., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Poultry, piggery, maize, Cassava. 8., Approved flagship projects = ngoes) Diary and diary products, Fruit enterprise(ma. 8., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected by the LG? = No. 8., How many enterpri ses are implem enting flagship projects = 0. 8., Numb er of PDM enterp rises = 100. 8., How many of of the the enterpri ses are enterpri ses = 45. 8., farming the priority How many farming enterprises are from commodity list = 0. 9., Parish Name = Ngalwe. 9., Name of SACCO = Ngalwe Olok. 9., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Dairy, poultry, piggery, onions,. 9., Approved flagship projects = ngoes) Diary and diary products, Fruit enterprise(ma ngoes). 9., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected by the LG? = No. 9., How many enterpri ses are implem enting flagship projects = 0. 9., Numb er of
|
d8ffe9ce-9d3c-409e-b2c7-c21129856027
|
3
|
Appendix 10: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
SACCO. 6, 6 = 6. 6, No = No. 6, 2 = 27. 6, 9 = 90. 6, 9 = 90. 6, 2 = 27. 7, Ibanda = Ibanda. 7, Rwengwe = Kihani. 7, Rwengwe Kikenkye PDM SACCO = Kihani Kikyenkye PDM SACCO. 7, 6 = 6. 7, No = No. 7, 2 = 2. 7, 9 = 7. 7, 9 = 7. 7, 2 = 2. 8, Ibanda = Ibanda. 8, Rwengwe = Ngango. 8, Rwengwe Kikenkye PDM SACCO = Ngango Igorora PDM SACCO. 8, 6 = 6. 8, No = No. 8, 2 = 6. 8, 9 = 14. 8, 9 = 14. 8, 2 = 4. 9, Ibanda = Ibanda. 9, Rwengwe = Igorora. 9, Rwengwe Kikenkye PDM SACCO = Igorora Igorora PDM SACCO. 9, 6 = 6. 9, No = No. 9, 2 = 5. 9, 9 = 16. 9, 9 = 16. 9, 2 = 5. 10, Ibanda = Ibanda. 10, Rwengwe = kakinga. 10, Rwengwe Kikenkye PDM SACCO = Kakinga- Ishongororo. 10, 6 = 6. 10, No = No. 10, 2 = 12. 10, 9 = 40. 10, 9 = 40. 10, 2 = 12. , Ibanda = TOTAL. , Rwengwe = . , Rwengwe Kikenkye PDM SACCO = . , 6 = 60. , No = . , 2 = 81. , 9 = 253. , 9 = 253. , 2 = 79
|
41aceead-7c66-4028-a854-5434f36a1f9c
|
3
|
Appendix 21: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
, Vote Name. = OMORO DLG. , Parish Name.LANENOBER Parish = . , Name of SACCO.LANENOBER PDM SACCO = . , List of flagship projects per SACCO.Maize, Soyabeans and Vegetables = . , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG?.Only Soya beans = . , How many enterpris es are impleme nting flagship projects.5 = . , Number of PDM enterprises.18 = . , How many of the enterpris es are farming enterpris es.18 = . , How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list.5 = . 2., Vote Name. = OMORO DLG. 2., Parish Name.LANENOBER Parish = ABIGEDI Parish. 2., Name of SACCO.LANENOBER PDM SACCO = ABIGEDI PDM SACCO. 2., List of flagship projects per SACCO.Maize, Soyabeans and Vegetables = Piggery, poultry, maize and soya beans. 2., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG?.Only Soya beans = Only Soya beans. 2., How many enterpris es are impleme nting flagship projects.5 = 5. 2., Number of PDM enterprises.18 = 15. 2., How many of the enterpris es are farming enterpris es.18 = 15. 2., How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list.5 = 5. 3., Vote Name. = OMORO DLG. 3., Parish Name.LANENOBER Parish = GEM Parish. 3., Name of SACCO.LANENOBER PDM SACCO = GEM PDM SACCO. 3., List of flagship projects per SACCO.Maize, Soyabeans and Vegetables = Piggery, maize and soyabeans. 3., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the
|
ea67fde7-e74c-4dcb-af2b-ff8544ae718b
|
3
|
Appendix 5(h); Follow up on the stipulated loan application and approval process
8, 1 = Kyenj ojo DLG. 8, 2 = Kinoger o Pariah. 8, 3 = Kinogero -Katooke S/C PDM SACCO. 8, 4 = MBABAZI RESTY. 8, 5 = Yes. 8, 6 = 30/07/2 023. 8, 7 = 1,000,000. 8, 8 = 1,000,000. 8, 9 = Yes. 8, 10 = No. 8, 11 = No. 8, 12 = Yes. , 1 = . , 2 = . , 3 = . , 4 = SABIITI MOSES. , 5 = Yes. , 6 = 30/07/2 023. , 7 = 1,000,000. , 8 = 1,000,000. , 9 = Yes. , 10 = No. , 11 = No. , 12 = Yes. 9, 1 = Kyenj ojo DLG. 9, 2 = Nyakisi Parish. 9, 3 = Nyakisi- Nyakisi S/C PDM. 9, 4 = TUHAISE MARGRET. 9, 5 = Yes. 9, 6 = 30/07/2 023. 9, 7 = 1,000,000. 9, 8 = 1,000,000. 9, 9 = Yes. 9, 10 = No. 9, 11 = No. 9, 12 = Yes. , 1 = . , 2 = . , 3 = . , 4 = KISEMBO STEPHEN. , 5 = Yes. , 6 = 20/09/2 023. , 7 = 1,000,000. , 8 = 1,000,000. , 9 = Yes. , 10 = No. , 11 = No. , 12 = Yes. 10, 1 = Kyenj ojo DLG. 10, 2 = Kabatoo ro Parish. 10, 3 = Kabatoor o-Nyakisi S/C PDM. 10, 4 = KASEMIRO
|
4bf07184-4d1f-4534-a55c-328a48903155
|
3
|
Appendix 20: Update Enterprise and Household Registers
10, 1 = Mayuge DLg. 10, 2 = Kasugu ward. 10, 3 = Kasugu ward Mayuge Town. 10, 4 = Poultry , Piggery , Fruit farming. 10, 5 = Coffee, cocoa,d airy. 10, 6 = None. 10, 7 = 33. 10, 8 = 33. 10, 9 = None. , 1 = Mayuge DLg. , 2 = Kasugu ward. , 3 = council PDM SACCO. , 4 = . , 5 = . , 6 = . , 7 = . , 8 = . , 9 =
|
80617cf8-2878-45e5-9585-d8e260a8fc59
|
3
|
Appendix 28: Parishes with flagship projects inconsistent with Kiryandongo Selected Priority Commodities
Appendix 29: Households that did not implement items from the priority list
Ward parish. , Name of SACCO = Ward C - kigumba. , List of flagship projects per SACCO = Gnuts,poutry,cabbage,to matoes,oninons. , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. , How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 6. , Number of PDM enterprise s = 18. , How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 6. , How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 6. , Parish Name = 5.bera Kyem parish. , Name of SACCO = Kyembera- Kiryandongo. , List of flagship projects per SACCO = Piggery,maize,Goat,soyab ean,sunflower. , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. , How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 5. , Number of PDM enterprise s = 12. , How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 5. , How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 5. , Parish Name = 6.be Kikuu parish. , Name of SACCO = Kikuube- Kiryandongo. , List of flagship projects per SACCO = Piggery,maize,Goat,soyab ean,sunflower. , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. , How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 5. , Number of PDM enterprise s = 18. , How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 5. , How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 5. , Parish Name = 7. ral
|
2317eabe-12fa-450a-a223-88c1ee5a1654
|
3
|
Appendix 6: Exclusion of parish/wards from PDM
= 81. 15, = Osudio Parish. 16, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Aparisa Parish. 16, = 82. 16, = Apeleun Parish. 17, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Apolin Parish. 17, = 83. 17, = Akisim Parish. 18, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Katakwi Parish. 18, = 84. 18, = Oriau Parish. 19, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Ocorimongin Town Board. 19, = 85. 19, = Kipinyang Parish. 20, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Olela Parish. 20, = 86. 20, = Kanapa Parish. 21, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Osudan Parish. 21, = 87. 21, = Eastern Ward. 22, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Nothern Ward. 22, = 88. 22, = Southern Ward. 23, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Southern Ward. 23, = 89. 23, = Obwangor Ward. 24, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Western Ward. 24, = 90. 24, = Adungulu Parish. 25, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Eastern Ward. 25, = 91. 25, = Akoboi Parish. 26, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Acanga Parish. 26, = 92. 26, = Aparisa Parish. 27, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Adipala Parish. 27, = 93. 27, = Atirir Parish
75
|
b709d462-13c3-4de1-b331-ca2b451342a5
|
3
|
Appendix 21: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
commodi ty list.5 = 3. 6., Vote Name. = . 6., Parish Name.LANENOBER Parish = . 6., Name of SACCO.LANENOBER PDM SACCO = . 6., List of flagship projects per SACCO.Maize, Soyabeans and Vegetables = . 6., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG?.Only Soya beans = . 6., How many enterpris es are impleme nting flagship projects.5 = . 6., Number of PDM enterprises.18 = . 6., How many of the enterpris es are farming enterpris es.18 = . 6., How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list.5 =
65
|
63be3ebc-251f-48bd-b1e3-16a77472e293
|
3
|
Appendix 21: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
plans for the FY 2022/2023. Karangara Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 57. Karangara Parish, Ruguuza Parish = Mukisa Fredrick. Karangara Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = Secretary. Karangara Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Karangara Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 58. Karangara Parish, Ruguuza Parish = Nambogo Resty. Karangara Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = Women representative. Karangara Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Karangara Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 59. Karangara Parish, Ruguuza Parish = Yiga William. Karangara Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = Youth. Karangara Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Karangara Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 60. Karangara Parish, Ruguuza Parish = Kiiza John. Karangara Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = PWD. Karangara Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Karangara Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 61. Karangara Parish, Ruguuza Parish = Kasangaki Benard. Karangara Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = NRM Ruling party. Karangara Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Karangara Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action
|
463c2691-85d4-4b0b-89fd-7e1f2663cc35
|
3
|
Appendix XI: Schools without teacher Houses
Primary school. , SIN = 3. , District = Kira MC. , Name of School = Melissa Primary School. , SIN = . , District = Luwero District. , Name of School = Bugema C.O.U Primary School. , SIN = 5. , District = Luwero District. , Name of School = Bukasa RJC Primary School. , SIN = 6. , District = Njeru MC. , Name of School = Kinaabi UMEA Primary School. , SIN = . , District = Njeru MC. , Name of School = Luwala Primary School. , SIN = 8. , District = Kayunga DLG. , Name of School = Kayunga Mixed Primary School. Eastern, SIN = 9. Eastern, District = Bugiri DLG. Eastern, Name of School = Lwanika Primary School. , SIN = 10. , District = Mbale City. , Name of School = Nankusi Primary School. Southern/ Western, SIN = 11. Southern/ Western, District = Fort Portal City. Southern/ Western, Name of School = Haibaale Primary School. , SIN = 12. , District = Kamwenge DLG. , Name of School = Kabingo Primary School. , SIN = 13. , District = Kanungu DLG. , Name of School = Kashwojwa Primary School. , SIN = 14. , District = Rukungiri MC. , Name of School = Rukungiri Primary School. , SIN = 15. , District = Mitooma DLG. , Name of School = Butembe Primary School. , SIN = 16. , District = Mbarara City. , Name of School = Kambaba Primary School. , SIN = 17. , District = Kitagwenda DLG. , Name of School = Kyanyimaihura Primary School. , SIN = 18. , District = Ibanda DLG. , Name of School = Ruyonza Primary School. Northern/West Nile, SIN = 19. Northern/West Nile, District = Nebbi District. Northern/West Nile, Name of School = Got Lembe Primary School. , SIN = 20. , District = Arua City. ,
|
410237bd-7c9a-4dd5-b33d-e124eca6c247
|
3
|
Appendix 22: Failure to register Enterprise Groups
1, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 1, Parish Name = Biiso. 1, Name of SACCO = Biiso Biiso PDM Sacco Ltd. 1, Number of PDM enterprises = 16. 1, How many enterprises are registered as CBOs = 16. 2, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 2, Parish Name = Biiso ward. 2, Name of SACCO = Biiso Biiso T/C PDM Sacco. 2, Number of PDM enterprises = 17. 2, How many enterprises are registered as CBOs = 17. 3, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 3, Parish Name = Bugana. 3, Name of SACCO = Bugana Buliisa PDM Sacco Ltd. 3, Number of PDM enterprises = 48. 3, How many enterprises are registered as CBOs = 43. 4, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 4, Parish Name = Western ward. 4, Name of SACCO = Western Buliisa PDM Sacco Ltd. 4, Number of PDM enterprises = 22. 4, How many enterprises are registered as CBOs = 22. 5, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 5, Parish Name = Western ward. 5, Name of SACCO = Western Butiaba PDM Sacco Ltd. 5, Number of PDM enterprises = 19. 5, How many enterprises are registered as CBOs = 19. 6, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 6, Parish Name = Kigwera. 6, Name of SACCO = Kigwera Kigwera PDM Sacco Ltd. 6, Number of PDM enterprises = 16. 6, How many enterprises are registered as CBOs = 16. 7, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 7, Parish Name = Kisansya. 7, Name of SACCO = Kisansya Kigwera PDM Sacco Ltd. 7, Number of PDM enterprises = 16. 7, How many enterprises are registered as CBOs = 16. 8, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 8, Parish Name = Garasoya. 8, Name of SACCO = Garasoya Kihungya PDM Sacco Ltd. 8, Number of PDM
|
3c5a824b-6887-4f75-8696-29bfe1c0d7e0
|
3
|
Appendix 20: Failure to carry out Wealth ranking of households
villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 10., Remarks = No evidence availed
|
85c37260-a592-492b-9411-7711512d8595
|
3
|
Appendix 25: Wealth Ranking of Households
Appendix 26: Parishes which selected flagship projects that were inconsistent with the LG selected priority commodities
|
f35fa90c-7d29-486a-a119-83ca08c99d82
|
3
|
priority commodities
rowing, G.Nuts , Piggery, , Chicken rearing, Goat rearing, Rice. 40, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000
27
|
c747e056-4f2e-487a-86f1-ecd4a0101104
|
3
|
Appendix 12: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
KAZINDIRO, PDM SACCO.KASHAYO PDM SACCO = KAZINDIRO - BUGANGARI PDM SACCO. KAZINDIRO, - BUGANGARI Bananas, = Bananas, Coffee,Goat,Piggery. KAZINDIRO, No.Coffee,Goat, Cattle,Poultry = No. KAZINDIRO, 10 = 15. KAZINDIRO, 10 = 15. KAZINDIRO, 10 = 15. KAZINDIRO, 8 = 12. KAZINDIRO, 2 = 3. KYABUREERE, PDM SACCO.KASHAYO PDM SACCO = KYABUREERE - BUGANGARI PDM SACCO. KYABUREERE, - BUGANGARI Bananas, = Bananas, Coffee,Goat,Piggery, Bee keeping. KYABUREERE, No.Coffee,Goat, Cattle,Poultry = No. KYABUREERE, 10 = 13. KYABUREERE, 10 = 13. KYABUREERE, 10 = 13. KYABUREERE, 8 = 11. KYABUREERE, 2 = 2. NYABITEETE, PDM SACCO.KASHAYO PDM SACCO = NYABITEETE - BUGANGARI PDM SACCO. NYABITEETE, - BUGANGARI Bananas, = Coffee,Goat, Bee keeping,Onions,Piggery. NYABITEETE, No.Coffee,Goat, Cattle,Poultry = No. NYABITEETE, 10 = 24. NYABITEETE, 10 = 24. NYABITEETE, 10 = 24. NYABITEETE, 8 = 17. NYABITEETE, 2 = 7. BUHUNGA, PDM SACCO.KASHAYO PDM SACCO = BUHUNGA - BUHUNGA S/C PDM SACCO. BUHUNGA, -
|
4b069e25-f366-4248-9a3e-96e158e938c2
|
3
|
Appendix 27: Enterprises that implemented projects that were not from the priority commodity list
with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 7, How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 8. 7, Number of PDM enterprises = 11. 7, How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 11. 7, How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 8
103
9, Kibaale DLG = Kibaale DLG Karangara. 9, Ruguuza = Karangara Matale. 9, Ruguuza Kibaale PDM SACCO LTD = PDM. 9, Poultry, = Poultry, Coffee and food crop. 9, coffee, cattle and piggery = No. 9, No = 2. 9, 7 11 = 11. 9, 11 = 11. 9, 7 = 2. 10, Kibaale DLG = Kibaale DLG. 10, Ruguuza = Kitaba. 10, Ruguuza Kibaale PDM SACCO LTD = Kitaba Matale PDM SACCO. 10, Poultry, = Coffee, Food crop, piggery and poultry. 10, coffee, cattle and piggery = No. 10, No = 6. 10, 7 11 = 11. 10, 11 = 11. 10, 7 = 6. , Kibaale DLG = . , Ruguuza = . , Ruguuza Kibaale PDM SACCO LTD = . , Poultry, = . , coffee, cattle and piggery = . , No = . , 7 11 = 70 120. , 11 = 120. , 7 = 70
104
|
7345be96-7927-4f20-90b4-5b58b9d09e34
|
3
|
Appendix 21: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabaleega Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 40. Kabaleega Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Irumba Julius. Kabaleega Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = Ruling. Kabaleega Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabaleega Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 41. Kabaleega Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Nabatanzi Victoria. Kabaleega Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = Opinion leader. Kabaleega Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabaleega Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 42. Masaaza Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Babyesiza Antwanita. Masaaza Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = Chairperson. Masaaza Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Masaaza Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 43. Masaaza Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Mukonyezi Winfred. Masaaza Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = Secretary. Masaaza Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Masaaza Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 44. Masaaza Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Kyakuha Agnes. Masaaza Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = Women representative. Masaaza Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Masaaza Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action
|
e590a9e6-1b12-4f95-b348-6287f2b96686
|
3
|
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 73, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 73, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 73, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 74, Vote code = 873. 74, Entity Name = KwaniaDLG. 74, No. of priorities = -. 74, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 74, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 74, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 74, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 75, Vote code = 876. 75, Entity Name = KyegegwaDLG. 75, No. of priorities = -. 75, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 75, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 75, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 75, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 76, Vote code = 877. 76, Entity Name = KyenjojoDLG. 76, No. of priorities = 7. 76, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 10. 76, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 76, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = 7. 76, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 77, Vote code = 878. 77, Entity Name = KyoteraDLG. 77, No. of priorities = 21. 77, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 9. 77, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 21. 77, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 77, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish
|
fc1c4d8e-32fb-4e4a-a369-560bc3f47f3a
|
3
|
Appendix 22: Failure to register Enterprise Groups
Appendix 24: Failure to carry out Wealth ranking of households
ranking was carried out = 0. 9, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 9, Parish Name = Waaki. 9, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 9, No. of villages = 6. 9, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 10, Vote Name = Buliisa DLG. 10, Parish Name = Mubako. 10, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 10, No. of villages = 3. 10, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. , Vote Name = . , Parish Name = Total. , Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = . , No. of villages = 33. , No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0
|
8820d334-0174-4b96-8db9-9b307de018af
|
3
|
Appendix 15: Households that did not implement items from the priority list
Name = Kiboga DLG. 7, Parish Name = Buninga. 7, Name of SACCO = SACCO Buninga - Kyekumbya PDM SACCO. 7, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Diary, mango growing, beans growing, piggery and poultry. 7, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditi es selected by the LG? = Partially. 7, How many enterprises are implementi ng flagship projects = 7. 7, Numb er of PDM enter prises = 16. 7, How many of the enter prises are farmi ng enter prises = 16. 7, How many of the farming enterpri ses are from the priority commo dity list = 7. 8, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 8, Parish Name = Kyekumbya. 8, Name of SACCO = Kyekumbya - Kyekumbya PDM SACCO. 8, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Piggery, Maize growing, beans growing, coffee growing and bee keeping. 8, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditi es selected by the LG? = Partially. 8, How many enterprises are implementi ng flagship projects = 4. 8, Numb er of PDM enter prises = 15. 8, How many of the enter prises are farmi ng enter prises = 15. 8, How many of the farming enterpri ses are from the priority commo dity list = 4. 9, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 9, Parish Name = Buzibweera. 9, Name of SACCO = Buzibweera - Kiboga T/C PDM SACCO. 9, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Poultry, Piggery, Produce dealing, Coffee dealing, diary. 9, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditi es selected by the LG? = Partially. 9, How many enterprises are implementi ng flagship projects = 1. 9, Numb er of PDM enter prises = 12. 9, How many of the enter prises are farmi ng enter prises = 10. 9, How many of the farming
|
6ba1c6e6-1686-4213-b27f-a66c47ff7c26
|
3
|
Appendix 13; Failure to follow the stipulated loan application and approval_process
, 1 = Masak DLG. , 2 = Bugere. , 3 = Bugere Kyesiiga. , 4 = Nalubega Ziida. , 5 = Yes. , 6 = 26/06/20 23. , 7 = 1,000,0 00. , 8 = Yes. , 9 = Yes. , 1 = . , 2 = . , 3 = . , 4 = Luswata Jimmy. , 5 = . , 6 = . , 7 = 1,000,0 00. , 8 = . , 9 = . 2, 1 = Masa ka DLG. 2, 2 = Makonzi. 2, 3 = Makonzi Bukakata. 2, 4 = Kakeeto Baram. 2, 5 = Yes. 2, 6 = 26/06/20 23. 2, 7 = 1,000,0 00. 2, 8 = Yes. 2, 9 = Yes. , 1 = Masa ka DLG. , 2 = Makonzi. , 3 = Makonzi Bukakata. , 4 = Nabasum ba Resty. , 5 = . , 6 = . , 7 = . , 8 = . , 9 = . 3, 1 = Masak DLG. 3, 2 = Kyesiiga. 3, 3 = Kyesiiga Kyesiiga. 3, 4 = Nassuna Mary. 3, 5 = Yes. 3, 6 = 30/06/20 23. 3, 7 = 1,000,0 00 1,000,0 00. 3, 8 = Yes. 3, 9 = Yes. , 1 = . , 2 = . , 3 = . , 4 = Ssali Ibra. , 5 = . , 6 = . , 7 = 1,000,0. , 8 = . , 9 = . , 1 = Masa ka DLG. , 2 = Kanywa. , 3 = Kanywa Buwunga. , 4 = Kamulege ya Musa. , 5 = Yes. , 6 = 26/06/20 23. , 7 = 1,000,0 00. , 8 = Yes. , 9 = Yes. 5, 1 = Masa ka. 5, 2 = Buwung. 5, 3
|
dad08ee7-9ea6-444f-94c0-d12bc4a58a98
|
3
|
Appendix 32: Physical Inspection of Household Project Implementation
Joshua. 14., 5 = 1,000,000. 14., 6 = 1,000,000. 14., 7 = Coffee. 14., 8 = Coffee garden seen. 15., 1 = ikuube K DLG. 15., 2 = Buhimba West- Buhimba TC. 15., 3 = Buhimba West- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 15., 4 = Kyagonza Brian. 15., 5 = 1,000,000. 15., 6 = 1,000,000. 15., 7 = Piggery. 15., 8 = Pigs seen. 16., 1 = ikuube K DLG. 16., 2 = Buhimba West- Buhimba TC. 16., 3 = Buhimba West- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 16., 4 = Ajuna Micheal. 16., 5 = 1,000,000. 16., 6 = 1,000,000. 16., 7 = Poultry. 16., 8 = Poultry farm seen. 17., 1 = ikuube K DLG. 17., 2 = Kigaaya East- Buhimba TC. 17., 3 = Kigaaya East- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 17., 4 = Kizza James. 17., 5 = 1,000,000. 17., 6 = 1,000,000. 17., 7 = Maize & Piggery Farming. 17., 8 = Pigs seen. 18., 1 = ikuube K DLG. 18., 2 = Kigaaya East- Buhimba TC. 18., 3 = Kigaaya East- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 18., 4 = Kirungi Ivan. 18., 5 = 1,000,000. 18., 6 = 1,000,000. 18., 7 = PIGGERY. 18., 8 = Pigs seen
83
|
8cf77507-a857-47d6-834a-dd1907e5370f
|
3
|
Appendix 16: Utilization of PRF at household level (Inspections carried out)
8, = Muwema Mutumba PDM SACCO. 8, go Town Council PDM SACCO = Butebeyi 'A' Poultry group. 8, = Mukisa Sarah Betty. 8, = 1m. 8, = 1m. 8, = Poultry. 8, & weeding. Used home grown seeds_ No record keeping = Purchased 30 birds at Ugx.850,000. Balance for feeding & treatment:. No record keeping. 9, = BULULE Ward Mutumba TC PDM SACCO. 9, go Town Council PDM SACCO = Bulule Central Cassava group iii. 9, = Ochwo Felix. 9, = . 9, = 1m. 9, = Cassava & Maize. 9, & weeding. Used home grown seeds_ No record keeping = Hired 3 acres of land at Ugx. 640,000. Used own seeds and cassava cuttings. Maintains garden records. 10., = Madowa PDM SACCO. 10., go Town Council PDM SACCO = Madowa Buswale Coffee Farmers group. 10., = Othieno Andrew. 10., = . 10., = . 10., = Coffee. 10., & weeding. Used home grown seeds_ No record keeping = Used Ugx 900,000 to purchase coffee seedlings, planting, treatment and fertilisers. ~Ugx. 100,000 purchased Eucalyptus seedlings against the PDM guidelines.. 12, = Nambug u Ward. 12, go Town Council PDM SACCO = Nambug Ward Namayin go Town Council PDM SACCO. 12, = KAUMA MARRY. 12, = Im. 12, = . 12, = . 12, & weeding. Used home grown seeds_ No record keeping = Purcased 30 birds at UGX 600,000. No record keeping. , = . , go Town Council PDM SACCO = . , = . , = . , = . ,
|
fc94b09c-a7c4-4b0f-9dc4-d9185d0a745f
|
3
|
Appendix 5 (g); Selection and implementation of prioritized/flagship projects
6., Kyenjoj o DLG = Kyenjoj o DLG. 6., Rwamukoora Parish = Kaihura Parish. 6., Rwamukoora -Katooke S/C PDM SACCO = Kaihura- Butiiti S/C PDM SACCO. 6., Irish Potatoes, Coffee and Maize = Piggery ,Poultry and Coffee. 6., Yes = Yes. 6., 1 = 2. 6., 3 = 3. 6., 3 = 1. 6., 1 = 1. 6., 3 = 3. 6., Yes = Yes. 7., Kyenjoj o DLG = Kyenjoj o DLG. 7., Rwamukoora Parish = Bwenzi Parish. 7., Rwamukoora -Katooke S/C PDM SACCO = Bwenzi- Butiiti S/C. 7., Irish Potatoes, Coffee and Maize = Maize, Poultry. 7., Yes = Yes. 7., 1 = 1. 7., 3 = 3. 7., 3 = 2. 7., 1 = 1. 7., 3 = 3. 7., Yes = Yes. 8., Kyenjoj o DLG = Kyenjoj o DLG. 8., Rwamukoora Parish = Kinogero Pariah. 8., Rwamukoora -Katooke S/C PDM SACCO = Kinogero- Katooke S/C PDM SACCO. 8., Irish Potatoes, Coffee and Maize = Coffee, Maize and Goats. 8., Yes = Yes. 8., 1 = 1. 8., 3 = 3. 8., 3 = 2. 8., 1 = 1. 8., 3 = 3. 8., Yes = Yes. 9., Kyenjoj o DLG = Kyenjoj o DLG. 9., Rwamukoora Parish = Nyakisi Parish. 9., Rwamukoora -Katooke
|
f0a947ba-bbf6-40b0-82ac-f4e4881c05f1
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.