| --- |
| language: |
| - en |
| license: mit |
| size_categories: |
| - 1K<n<10K |
| task_categories: |
| - time-series-forecasting |
| - tabular-classification |
| - tabular-regression |
| tags: |
| - time-series |
| - foundation-models |
| - probing |
| - benchmark |
| - evaluation |
| - synthetic |
| - baseline-controlled |
| - neurips-2026 |
| pretty_name: TSFMI-Synthetic |
| configs: |
| - config_name: trend |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: trend/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: trend/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: trend/test.parquet |
| - config_name: seasonality |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: seasonality/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: seasonality/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: seasonality/test.parquet |
| - config_name: frequency |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: frequency/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: frequency/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: frequency/test.parquet |
| - config_name: stationarity |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: stationarity/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: stationarity/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: stationarity/test.parquet |
| - config_name: anomaly |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: anomaly/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: anomaly/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: anomaly/test.parquet |
| - config_name: change_point |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: change_point/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: change_point/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: change_point/test.parquet |
| - config_name: trend_hard |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: trend_hard/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: trend_hard/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: trend_hard/test.parquet |
| - config_name: frequency_hard |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: frequency_hard/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: frequency_hard/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: frequency_hard/test.parquet |
| - config_name: stationarity_hard |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: stationarity_hard/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: stationarity_hard/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: stationarity_hard/test.parquet |
| - config_name: anomaly_hard |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: anomaly_hard/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: anomaly_hard/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: anomaly_hard/test.parquet |
| - config_name: change_point_hard |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: change_point_hard/train.parquet |
| - split: validation |
| path: change_point_hard/val.parquet |
| - split: test |
| path: change_point_hard/test.parquet |
| --- |
| |
| # TSFMI-Synthetic |
|
|
| Synthetic time-series datasets with **mathematically exact ground-truth labels** |
| for the TSFMI baseline-controlled probing protocol. |
|
|
| > Companion data for the NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations & Datasets Track submission |
| > *"TSFMI: A Baseline-Controlled Evaluation Protocol for Time-Series Foundation |
| > Model Representations."* The code (anonymous) lives at |
| > https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TSFMI. |
|
|
| ## Why this dataset exists |
|
|
| Probing time-series foundation models (TSFMs) is hard because high probe |
| accuracy may reflect probe capacity rather than encoded knowledge. TSFMI |
| addresses this with **explicit non-model controls** (hand-crafted features, |
| raw signal, random projection, ROCKET) evaluated under the same canonical |
| 60/20/20 split, the same sklearn estimator, the same 5 seeds, and the same |
| bootstrap CI as the model probe. The synthetic datasets in this repository |
| provide six standard temporal properties **plus five hard variants** under |
| which TSFM representation claims can be evaluated against the controls. |
|
|
| ## Configurations (11 tasks) |
|
|
| | Config | Type | Classes / Range | Description | |
| |---|---|---|---| |
| | `trend` | classification | 3 (up / down / flat) | linear slope ± noise | |
| | `seasonality` | regression | period ∈ {8, 16, 32, 64} | sinusoid + noise; label = period | |
| | `frequency` | classification | 8 frequency bins | discrete sinusoidal frequency bands | |
| | `stationarity` | classification | 2 (stationary / non-stationary) | Gaussian noise vs. random walk | |
| | `anomaly` | classification | 2 (normal / anomaly) | single ±5σ point spike — **kurtosis is a sufficient statistic** | |
| | `change_point` | classification | 2 (none / has-CP) | mean+variance shift at midpoint | |
| | `*_hard` (5) | classification | varies | structured background + subtle anomalies / weak slopes / overlapping harmonics / variance drift / mild CP | |
|
|
| Each config has 1000 sequences of length 512, partitioned 60/20/20 |
| (train/val/test = 600/200/200). All data is generated deterministically with |
| `seed=42` (data) and `split_seed=0` (partition), matching the canonical |
| artefacts in the paper. |
|
|
| ## Quick start |
|
|
| ```python |
| from datasets import load_dataset |
| |
| ds = load_dataset("EvalData/TSFMI", "anomaly") |
| print(ds) |
| # DatasetDict({ |
| # train: 600, validation: 200, test: 200 |
| # }) |
| print(ds["train"][0]["sequence"][:8], ds["train"][0]["label"]) |
| ``` |
|
|
| Each row contains: |
|
|
| - `sequence`: list[float] of length 512 (the time-series window) |
| - `label`: int (classification) or float (seasonality regression) |
| - `seed`: int (data-generation seed; always 42 here) |
| - `split_seed`: int (split seed used to partition this row; 0 for the canonical artefacts) |
|
|
| ## Reproduction recipe |
|
|
| The same 60/20/20 + 5-seed + bootstrap protocol used in the paper is |
| implemented in [the GitHub repository](https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TSFMI): |
|
|
| ```bash |
| curl -L -o TSFMI.zip "https://anonymous.4open.science/api/repo/TSFMI/zip" |
| unzip TSFMI.zip && cd TSFMI |
| python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate |
| pip install -r requirements.txt && pip install -e ".[dev]" |
| |
| # CPU smoke test (<10 min) — reproduces the headline HC anomaly = 0.858 cell |
| make smoke |
| |
| # Full canonical pipeline (~48 A100-hours) |
| make extract-representations |
| make reproduce-all |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Headline result reproducible from this dataset |
|
|
| Under the canonical 60/20/20 protocol with sklearn `LogisticRegression` and a |
| bootstrap 95% CI over 5 seeds: |
|
|
| - An 8-D **hand-crafted feature vector** reaches **0.858** test accuracy on |
| the canonical `anomaly` configuration. |
| - A **single kurtosis feature** alone reaches **0.859**. |
| - A **single max-absolute-magnitude feature** alone reaches **0.907**. |
| - The best of seven pre-trained TSFMs reaches **0.753** (TimesFM); all other |
| TSFMs (MOMENT, Chronos, PatchTST, GPT4TS, Timer, Moirai) score 0.50–0.73. |
|
|
| This **inversion** is what motivates the baseline-controlled discipline of |
| TSFMI and is documented in §3.3 and Appendix A.8 of the paper. |
|
|
| ## License |
|
|
| MIT. The synthetic data is fully procedurally generated; there is no |
| human-derived or scraped content. Real-world datasets used elsewhere by the |
| TSFMI evaluation pipeline (ETTh1, Weather, Electricity, Traffic, Exchange |
| Rate, UCR) are **not redistributed here** and remain under their respective |
| original licenses; see the GitHub `LICENSE` file for details. |
|
|
| ## Citation |
|
|
| ```bibtex |
| @misc{tsfmi2026, |
| title = {{TSFMI}: A Baseline-Controlled Evaluation Protocol for Time-Series Foundation Model Representations}, |
| author = {Anonymous Authors}, |
| howpublished = {Anonymous submission to the NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations \& Datasets Track}, |
| year = {2026}, |
| url = {https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TSFMI} |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Responsible AI notes |
|
|
| - **Data collection**: synthetic procedural generation, no human subjects, no scraping. |
| - **Limitations**: each generator instantiates one statistically simple test bed; the canonical anomaly task is kurtosis-trivial by design (`realistic_anomaly` variant in the GitHub repo bounds this). |
| - **Biases**: none — purely synthetic with no demographic content. |
| - **Personal/sensitive info**: none. |
| - **Use cases**: probing TSFM internal representations, calibrating new probing protocols against simple non-model baselines. |
| - **Misuse cases**: not intended as a production anomaly detector; do not interpret the canonical anomaly task as evidence that any model "detects anomalies" in any operational sense. |
| - **Synthetic data indicator**: 100% synthetic. |
|
|
| The full Croissant 1.0 + RAI metadata is provided as `CROISSANT.json` in this |
| repository. |
|
|