gem_id
stringlengths 20
25
| id
stringlengths 24
24
| title
stringlengths 3
59
| context
stringlengths 151
3.71k
| question
stringlengths 1
270
| target
stringlengths 1
270
| references
list | answers
dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
gem-squad_v2-train-107500
|
57262bce89a1e219009ac4f2
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
Shell Oil Company's United States business throughout its early history is described as what?
|
Shell Oil Company's United States business throughout its early history is described as what?
|
[
"Shell Oil Company's United States business throughout its early history is described as what?"
] |
{
"text": [
"substantially independent"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107501
|
57262bce89a1e219009ac4f3
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
On which exchange was Shell Oil Company's U.S. stock historically traded?
|
On which exchange was Shell Oil Company's U.S. stock historically traded?
|
[
"On which exchange was Shell Oil Company's U.S. stock historically traded?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the NYSE"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107502
|
57262bce89a1e219009ac4f4
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
Shell Oil Company historically had little direct involvement from what entity in the running of its American businesses?
|
Shell Oil Company historically had little direct involvement from what entity in the running of its American businesses?
|
[
"Shell Oil Company historically had little direct involvement from what entity in the running of its American businesses?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the group's central offices"
],
"answer_start": [
201
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107503
|
57262bce89a1e219009ac4f5
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
In what year did Royal Dutch Shell make a bid to purchase approximately 30% of Shell Oil Company's shares?
|
In what year did Royal Dutch Shell make a bid to purchase approximately 30% of Shell Oil Company's shares?
|
[
"In what year did Royal Dutch Shell make a bid to purchase approximately 30% of Shell Oil Company's shares?"
] |
{
"text": [
"1984"
],
"answer_start": [
282
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107504
|
57262bce89a1e219009ac4f6
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
What did Royal Dutch Shell's bid to purchase Shell Oil Company's shares lead to?
|
What did Royal Dutch Shell's bid to purchase Shell Oil Company's shares lead to?
|
[
"What did Royal Dutch Shell's bid to purchase Shell Oil Company's shares lead to?"
] |
{
"text": [
"a court case"
],
"answer_start": [
460
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107505
|
5a627c79f8d794001af1c028
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
Shell's early history involved a lot of involvement from what?
|
Shell's early history involved a lot of involvement from what?
|
[
"Shell's early history involved a lot of involvement from what?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107506
|
5a627c79f8d794001af1c029
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
What percentage of the Shell Oil Company did Royal Dutch Shell own in 1984?
|
What percentage of the Shell Oil Company did Royal Dutch Shell own in 1984?
|
[
"What percentage of the Shell Oil Company did Royal Dutch Shell own in 1984?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107507
|
5a627c79f8d794001af1c02a
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
How much did the court case cost?
|
How much did the court case cost?
|
[
"How much did the court case cost?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107508
|
5a627c79f8d794001af1c02b
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
When did Royal Dutch Shell try to sell its shares?
|
When did Royal Dutch Shell try to sell its shares?
|
[
"When did Royal Dutch Shell try to sell its shares?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107509
|
5a627c79f8d794001af1c02c
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Through most of Shell's early history, the Shell Oil Company business in the United States was substantially independent with its stock being traded on the NYSE and with little direct involvement from the group's central offices in the running of the American business. However, in 1984, Royal Dutch Shell made a bid to purchase those shares of Shell Oil Company it did not own (around 30%) and despite opposition from some minority shareholders, which led to a court case, Shell completed the buyout for a sum of $5.7 billion.
|
Who approved of the Royal Dutch shell buyout?
|
Who approved of the Royal Dutch shell buyout?
|
[
"Who approved of the Royal Dutch shell buyout?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107510
|
57262d01ec44d21400f3dba3
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
The final investment decision for what was finalized by Royal Dutch Shell in May 2011?
|
The final investment decision for what was finalized by Royal Dutch Shell in May 2011?
|
[
"The final investment decision for what was finalized by Royal Dutch Shell in May 2011?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107511
|
57262d01ec44d21400f3dba4
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
The remote offshore Prelude field was discovered where?
|
The remote offshore Prelude field was discovered where?
|
[
"The remote offshore Prelude field was discovered where?"
] |
{
"text": [
"off Australia's northwestern coast"
],
"answer_start": [
214
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107512
|
57262d01ec44d21400f3dba5
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
The Prelude field was estimated to contain how many cubic feet of natural gas reserves?
|
The Prelude field was estimated to contain how many cubic feet of natural gas reserves?
|
[
"The Prelude field was estimated to contain how many cubic feet of natural gas reserves?"
] |
{
"text": [
"3 trillion"
],
"answer_start": [
280
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107513
|
57262d01ec44d21400f3dba6
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
On what developments was FLNG technology based?
|
On what developments was FLNG technology based?
|
[
"On what developments was FLNG technology based?"
] |
{
"text": [
"liquefied natural gas (LNG)"
],
"answer_start": [
374
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107514
|
57262d01ec44d21400f3dba7
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
FLNG technology faciliates what?
|
FLNG technology faciliates what?
|
[
"FLNG technology faciliates what?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas"
],
"answer_start": [
475
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107515
|
5a627da5f8d794001af1c040
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
When did Royal Dutch Shell make its first investment into FLNG?
|
When did Royal Dutch Shell make its first investment into FLNG?
|
[
"When did Royal Dutch Shell make its first investment into FLNG?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107516
|
5a627da5f8d794001af1c041
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
When was FLNG technology created?
|
When was FLNG technology created?
|
[
"When was FLNG technology created?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107517
|
5a627da5f8d794001af1c042
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
What is located off Australia's southwestern coast?
|
What is located off Australia's southwestern coast?
|
[
"What is located off Australia's southwestern coast?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107518
|
5a627da5f8d794001af1c043
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
Where were FLNG technologies pioneered?
|
Where were FLNG technologies pioneered?
|
[
"Where were FLNG technologies pioneered?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107519
|
5a627da5f8d794001af1c044
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 20 May 2011, Royal Dutch Shell's final investment decision for the world's first floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility was finalized following the discovery of the remote offshore Prelude field—located off Australia's northwestern coast and estimated to contain about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent reserves—in 2007. FLNG technology is based on liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments that were pioneered in the mid-20th century and facilitates the exploitation of untapped natural gas reserves located in remote areas, often too small to extract any other way.
|
When was the FLNG facility built?
|
When was the FLNG facility built?
|
[
"When was the FLNG facility built?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107520
|
57262e99271a42140099d70d
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
What percent of its stake in Woodside Petroleum did Shell sell in June 2014?
|
What percent of its stake in Woodside Petroleum did Shell sell in June 2014?
|
[
"What percent of its stake in Woodside Petroleum did Shell sell in June 2014?"
] |
{
"text": [
"9.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
11
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107521
|
57262e99271a42140099d70e
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a takeover attempt was blocked in what year?
|
Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a takeover attempt was blocked in what year?
|
[
"Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a takeover attempt was blocked in what year?"
] |
{
"text": [
"2001"
],
"answer_start": [
230
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107522
|
57262e99271a42140099d70f
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
Who blocked the takeover attempt?
|
Who blocked the takeover attempt?
|
[
"Who blocked the takeover attempt?"
] |
{
"text": [
"then federal Treasurer Peter Costello"
],
"answer_start": [
267
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107523
|
57262e99271a42140099d710
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
What percentage of shareholders voted to approve the 2014 buy-back?
|
What percentage of shareholders voted to approve the 2014 buy-back?
|
[
"What percentage of shareholders voted to approve the 2014 buy-back?"
] |
{
"text": [
"72"
],
"answer_start": [
477
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107524
|
57262e99271a42140099d711
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
What percentage of shareholder votes was need to approve the 2014 buy-back?
|
What percentage of shareholder votes was need to approve the 2014 buy-back?
|
[
"What percentage of shareholder votes was need to approve the 2014 buy-back?"
] |
{
"text": [
"75"
],
"answer_start": [
548
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107525
|
5a627e97f8d794001af1c050
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
How much Woodside stock in Shell sell in 2001?
|
How much Woodside stock in Shell sell in 2001?
|
[
"How much Woodside stock in Shell sell in 2001?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107526
|
5a627e97f8d794001af1c051
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
What Shell treasurer try to takeover Woodside in 2001?
|
What Shell treasurer try to takeover Woodside in 2001?
|
[
"What Shell treasurer try to takeover Woodside in 2001?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107527
|
5a627e97f8d794001af1c052
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
What percentage of shareholders approved the takeover attempt?
|
What percentage of shareholders approved the takeover attempt?
|
[
"What percentage of shareholders approved the takeover attempt?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107528
|
5a627e97f8d794001af1c053
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
What percentage of shareholders was required to block the Woodside takeover?
|
What percentage of shareholders was required to block the Woodside takeover?
|
[
"What percentage of shareholders was required to block the Woodside takeover?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107529
|
5a627e97f8d794001af1c054
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Shell sold 9.5% of its 23.1% stake in Woodside Petroleum in June 2014 and advised that it had reached an agreement for Woodside to buy back 9.5% of its shares at a later stage. Shell became a major shareholder in Woodside after a 2001 takeover attempt was blocked by then federal Treasurer Peter Costello and the corporation has been open about its intention to sell its stake in Woodside as part of its target to shed assets. At a general body meeting, held on 1 August 2014, 72 percent of shareholders voted to approve the buy-back, short of the 75 percent vote that was required for approval. A statement from Shell read: "Royal Dutch Shell acknowledges the outcome of Woodside Petroleum Limited's shareholders' negative vote on the selective buy-back proposal. Shell is reviewing its options in relation to its remaining 13.6 percent holding."
|
When was the meeting to decide whether or not to sell 9.5% of its Woodside Petroleum stock?
|
When was the meeting to decide whether or not to sell 9.5% of its Woodside Petroleum stock?
|
[
"When was the meeting to decide whether or not to sell 9.5% of its Woodside Petroleum stock?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107530
|
57262fab271a42140099d721
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
Shell purchased what in 2005?
|
Shell purchased what in 2005?
|
[
"Shell purchased what in 2005?"
] |
{
"text": [
"an offshore lease"
],
"answer_start": [
26
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107531
|
57262fab271a42140099d722
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
What did Shell initate after its 2005 purchase?
|
What did Shell initate after its 2005 purchase?
|
[
"What did Shell initate after its 2005 purchase?"
] |
{
"text": [
"its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program"
],
"answer_start": [
69
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107532
|
57262fab271a42140099d723
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
What executive initially led the Artic drilling project?
|
What executive initially led the Artic drilling project?
|
[
"What executive initially led the Artic drilling project?"
] |
{
"text": [
"Pete Slaiby"
],
"answer_start": [
254
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107533
|
57262fab271a42140099d724
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
What caused the delay in drilling after Shell's 2008 purchase?
|
What caused the delay in drilling after Shell's 2008 purchase?
|
[
"What caused the delay in drilling after Shell's 2008 purchase?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits"
],
"answer_start": [
444
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107534
|
57262fab271a42140099d725
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
Shell's plans to drill in the Artic led to protests from which particular environmental group?
|
Shell's plans to drill in the Artic led to protests from which particular environmental group?
|
[
"Shell's plans to drill in the Artic led to protests from which particular environmental group?"
] |
{
"text": [
"Greenpeace"
],
"answer_start": [
618
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107535
|
5a627fdff8d794001af1c05e
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
How much did the purchase of an offshore lease cost?
|
How much did the purchase of an offshore lease cost?
|
[
"How much did the purchase of an offshore lease cost?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107536
|
5a627fdff8d794001af1c05f
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
What Greenpeace executive protested the Arctic drilling?
|
What Greenpeace executive protested the Arctic drilling?
|
[
"What Greenpeace executive protested the Arctic drilling?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107537
|
5a627fdff8d794001af1c060
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
What oil rig cost Shell $4.5bil?
|
What oil rig cost Shell $4.5bil?
|
[
"What oil rig cost Shell $4.5bil?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107538
|
5a627fdff8d794001af1c061
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
When was Pete Slaiby taken off of the Arctic drilling program?
|
When was Pete Slaiby taken off of the Arctic drilling program?
|
[
"When was Pete Slaiby taken off of the Arctic drilling program?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107539
|
5a627fdff8d794001af1c062
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Following the purchase of an offshore lease in 2005, Shell initiated its US$4.5 billion Arctic drilling program in 2006, after the corporation purchased the "Kulluk" oil rig and leased the Noble Discoverer drillship. At inception, the project was led by Pete Slaiby, a Shell executive who had previously worked in the North Sea. However, after the purchase of a second offshore lease in 2008, Shell only commenced drilling work in 2012, due to the refurbishment of rigs, permit delays from the relevant authorities and lawsuits. The plans to drill in the Arctic led to protests from environmental groups, particularly Greenpeace; furthermore, analysts in the energy field, as well as related industries, also expressed skepticism due to perceptions that drilling in the region is "too dangerous because of harsh conditions and remote locations".
|
When was Pete Slaiby working in the North Sea?
|
When was Pete Slaiby working in the North Sea?
|
[
"When was Pete Slaiby working in the North Sea?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107540
|
572630c589a1e219009ac530
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Further problems hampered the Arctic project after the commencement of drilling in 2012, as Shell dealt with a series of issues that involved air permits, Coast Guard certification of a marine vessel and severe damage to essential oil-spill equipment. Additionally, difficult weather conditions resulted in the delay of drilling during mid-2012 and the already dire situation was exacerbated by the "Kulluk" incident at the end of the year. Royal Dutch Shell had invested nearly US$5 billion by this stage of the project.
|
What conditions caused the delay of drilling in mid-2012?
|
What conditions caused the delay of drilling in mid-2012?
|
[
"What conditions caused the delay of drilling in mid-2012?"
] |
{
"text": [
"difficult weather"
],
"answer_start": [
266
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107541
|
572630c589a1e219009ac531
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Further problems hampered the Arctic project after the commencement of drilling in 2012, as Shell dealt with a series of issues that involved air permits, Coast Guard certification of a marine vessel and severe damage to essential oil-spill equipment. Additionally, difficult weather conditions resulted in the delay of drilling during mid-2012 and the already dire situation was exacerbated by the "Kulluk" incident at the end of the year. Royal Dutch Shell had invested nearly US$5 billion by this stage of the project.
|
What worsened the situation at the end of 2012?
|
What worsened the situation at the end of 2012?
|
[
"What worsened the situation at the end of 2012?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the \"Kulluk\" incident"
],
"answer_start": [
395
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107542
|
572630c589a1e219009ac532
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Further problems hampered the Arctic project after the commencement of drilling in 2012, as Shell dealt with a series of issues that involved air permits, Coast Guard certification of a marine vessel and severe damage to essential oil-spill equipment. Additionally, difficult weather conditions resulted in the delay of drilling during mid-2012 and the already dire situation was exacerbated by the "Kulluk" incident at the end of the year. Royal Dutch Shell had invested nearly US$5 billion by this stage of the project.
|
What amount had Royal Dutch Shell invested in the project by the end of 2012?
|
What amount had Royal Dutch Shell invested in the project by the end of 2012?
|
[
"What amount had Royal Dutch Shell invested in the project by the end of 2012?"
] |
{
"text": [
"nearly US$5 billion"
],
"answer_start": [
472
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107543
|
572630c589a1e219009ac533
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Further problems hampered the Arctic project after the commencement of drilling in 2012, as Shell dealt with a series of issues that involved air permits, Coast Guard certification of a marine vessel and severe damage to essential oil-spill equipment. Additionally, difficult weather conditions resulted in the delay of drilling during mid-2012 and the already dire situation was exacerbated by the "Kulluk" incident at the end of the year. Royal Dutch Shell had invested nearly US$5 billion by this stage of the project.
|
In what year did drilling in the Arctic region begin?
|
In what year did drilling in the Arctic region begin?
|
[
"In what year did drilling in the Arctic region begin?"
] |
{
"text": [
"2012"
],
"answer_start": [
83
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107544
|
5a62874bf8d794001af1c0a8
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Further problems hampered the Arctic project after the commencement of drilling in 2012, as Shell dealt with a series of issues that involved air permits, Coast Guard certification of a marine vessel and severe damage to essential oil-spill equipment. Additionally, difficult weather conditions resulted in the delay of drilling during mid-2012 and the already dire situation was exacerbated by the "Kulluk" incident at the end of the year. Royal Dutch Shell had invested nearly US$5 billion by this stage of the project.
|
When did the Arctic project end?
|
When did the Arctic project end?
|
[
"When did the Arctic project end?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107545
|
5a62874bf8d794001af1c0a9
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Further problems hampered the Arctic project after the commencement of drilling in 2012, as Shell dealt with a series of issues that involved air permits, Coast Guard certification of a marine vessel and severe damage to essential oil-spill equipment. Additionally, difficult weather conditions resulted in the delay of drilling during mid-2012 and the already dire situation was exacerbated by the "Kulluk" incident at the end of the year. Royal Dutch Shell had invested nearly US$5 billion by this stage of the project.
|
Who damaged essential oil-spill equipment?
|
Who damaged essential oil-spill equipment?
|
[
"Who damaged essential oil-spill equipment?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107546
|
5a62874bf8d794001af1c0aa
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Further problems hampered the Arctic project after the commencement of drilling in 2012, as Shell dealt with a series of issues that involved air permits, Coast Guard certification of a marine vessel and severe damage to essential oil-spill equipment. Additionally, difficult weather conditions resulted in the delay of drilling during mid-2012 and the already dire situation was exacerbated by the "Kulluk" incident at the end of the year. Royal Dutch Shell had invested nearly US$5 billion by this stage of the project.
|
How much was invested in the Kulluk incident?
|
How much was invested in the Kulluk incident?
|
[
"How much was invested in the Kulluk incident?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107547
|
5a62874bf8d794001af1c0ab
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Further problems hampered the Arctic project after the commencement of drilling in 2012, as Shell dealt with a series of issues that involved air permits, Coast Guard certification of a marine vessel and severe damage to essential oil-spill equipment. Additionally, difficult weather conditions resulted in the delay of drilling during mid-2012 and the already dire situation was exacerbated by the "Kulluk" incident at the end of the year. Royal Dutch Shell had invested nearly US$5 billion by this stage of the project.
|
What caused the Kulluk incident?
|
What caused the Kulluk incident?
|
[
"What caused the Kulluk incident?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107548
|
5a62874bf8d794001af1c0ac
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
Further problems hampered the Arctic project after the commencement of drilling in 2012, as Shell dealt with a series of issues that involved air permits, Coast Guard certification of a marine vessel and severe damage to essential oil-spill equipment. Additionally, difficult weather conditions resulted in the delay of drilling during mid-2012 and the already dire situation was exacerbated by the "Kulluk" incident at the end of the year. Royal Dutch Shell had invested nearly US$5 billion by this stage of the project.
|
What certification was the Kulluk missing?
|
What certification was the Kulluk missing?
|
[
"What certification was the Kulluk missing?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107549
|
572631f7ec44d21400f3dc07
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
Why was the Kulluk oil rig being towed to Washington?
|
Why was the Kulluk oil rig being towed to Washington?
|
[
"Why was the Kulluk oil rig being towed to Washington?"
] |
{
"text": [
"to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107550
|
572631f7ec44d21400f3dc08
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
What caused towing crews and rescue service to lose control while the Kulluk rig was in transport to Washington?
|
What caused towing crews and rescue service to lose control while the Kulluk rig was in transport to Washington?
|
[
"What caused towing crews and rescue service to lose control while the Kulluk rig was in transport to Washington?"
] |
{
"text": [
"a winter storm"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107551
|
572631f7ec44d21400f3dc09
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
On January 1, 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast of which island?
|
On January 1, 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast of which island?
|
[
"On January 1, 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast of which island?"
] |
{
"text": [
"Sitkalidak"
],
"answer_start": [
319
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107552
|
572631f7ec44d21400f3dc0a
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
Following the incident, which magazine contacted Larry McKinney?
|
Following the incident, which magazine contacted Larry McKinney?
|
[
"Following the incident, which magazine contacted Larry McKinney?"
] |
{
"text": [
"Fortune"
],
"answer_start": [
403
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107553
|
572631f7ec44d21400f3dc0b
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
Larry McKinney explained that a two-month delay in drilling could do what?
|
Larry McKinney explained that a two-month delay in drilling could do what?
|
[
"Larry McKinney explained that a two-month delay in drilling could do what?"
] |
{
"text": [
"wipe out the entire drilling season"
],
"answer_start": [
650
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107554
|
5a628873f8d794001af1c0bc
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
Where was the Kulluk oil rig being towed from?
|
Where was the Kulluk oil rig being towed from?
|
[
"Where was the Kulluk oil rig being towed from?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107555
|
5a628873f8d794001af1c0bd
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
Where was the Kullug grounded in December?
|
Where was the Kullug grounded in December?
|
[
"Where was the Kullug grounded in December?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107556
|
5a628873f8d794001af1c0be
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
Who was the executive director of the Fortune magazine?
|
Who was the executive director of the Fortune magazine?
|
[
"Who was the executive director of the Fortune magazine?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107557
|
5a628873f8d794001af1c0bf
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
What magazine did Larry McKinney contact?
|
What magazine did Larry McKinney contact?
|
[
"What magazine did Larry McKinney contact?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107558
|
5a628873f8d794001af1c0c0
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
As the Kulluk oil rig was being towed to the American state of Washington to be serviced in preparation for the 2013 drilling season, a winter storm on 27 December 2012 caused the towing crews, as well as the rescue service, to lose control of the situation. As of 1 January 2013, the Kulluk was grounded off the coast Sitkalidak Island, near the eastern end of Kodiak Island. Following the accident, a Fortune magazine contacted Larry McKinney, the executive director at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M, and he explained that "A two-month delay in the Arctic is not a two-month delay ... A two-month delay could wipe out the entire drilling season."
|
How long did it take to tow the Kulluk to Washington state?
|
How long did it take to tow the Kulluk to Washington state?
|
[
"How long did it take to tow the Kulluk to Washington state?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107559
|
5726384b38643c19005ad319
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
Following what event was it uncertain if Shell would recommence drilling?
|
Following what event was it uncertain if Shell would recommence drilling?
|
[
"Following what event was it uncertain if Shell would recommence drilling?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the \"Kulluk\" incident"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107560
|
5726384b38643c19005ad31a
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
In February 2013, Shell Corporation announced that it would pause what?
|
In February 2013, Shell Corporation announced that it would pause what?
|
[
"In February 2013, Shell Corporation announced that it would pause what?"
] |
{
"text": [
"its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast"
],
"answer_start": [
163
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107561
|
5726384b38643c19005ad31b
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
Shell Corporation announced what in January 2014?
|
Shell Corporation announced what in January 2014?
|
[
"Shell Corporation announced what in January 2014?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic"
],
"answer_start": [
323
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107562
|
5726384b38643c19005ad31c
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
Which Shell Corporation executive explained the reason for the January 2014 announcement?
|
Which Shell Corporation executive explained the reason for the January 2014 announcement?
|
[
"Which Shell Corporation executive explained the reason for the January 2014 announcement?"
] |
{
"text": [
"van Beurden"
],
"answer_start": [
415
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107563
|
5726384b38643c19005ad31d
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
What reason did the executive give for Shell's January 2014 announcement?
|
What reason did the executive give for Shell's January 2014 announcement?
|
[
"What reason did the executive give for Shell's January 2014 announcement?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the project is \"under review\" due to both market and internal issues."
],
"answer_start": [
443
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107564
|
5a62926df8d794001af1c0ee
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
What project was based in Alaska?
|
What project was based in Alaska?
|
[
"What project was based in Alaska?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107565
|
5a62926df8d794001af1c0ef
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
When did van Beurden become the chief executive?
|
When did van Beurden become the chief executive?
|
[
"When did van Beurden become the chief executive?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107566
|
5a62926df8d794001af1c0f0
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
When was the original suspension of the drilling program?
|
When was the original suspension of the drilling program?
|
[
"When was the original suspension of the drilling program?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107567
|
5a62926df8d794001af1c0f1
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
When did shell announce it was resuming it Alaskan project?
|
When did shell announce it was resuming it Alaskan project?
|
[
"When did shell announce it was resuming it Alaskan project?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107568
|
5a62926df8d794001af1c0f2
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
It was unclear if Shell would recommence drilling in mid-2013, following the "Kulluk" incident and, in February 2013, the corporation stated that it would "pause" its closely watched drilling project off the Alaskan coast in 2013, and will instead prepare for future exploration. In January 2014, the corporation announced the extension of the suspension of its drilling program in the Arctic, with chief executive van Beurden explaining that the project is "under review" due to both market and internal issues.
|
Why was van Beurden under review?
|
Why was van Beurden under review?
|
[
"Why was van Beurden under review?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107569
|
5726390c38643c19005ad323
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the 1990s, protesters criticised the company's environmental record, particularly the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea. Despite support from the UK government, Shell reversed the decision under public pressure but maintained that sinking the platform would have been environmentally better. Shell subsequently published an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development, supported by executive speeches reinforcing this commitment.
|
For what particular reason did protesters criticize the company's environmental record in the 1990s?
|
For what particular reason did protesters criticize the company's environmental record in the 1990s?
|
[
"For what particular reason did protesters criticize the company's environmental record in the 1990s?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107570
|
5726390c38643c19005ad324
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the 1990s, protesters criticised the company's environmental record, particularly the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea. Despite support from the UK government, Shell reversed the decision under public pressure but maintained that sinking the platform would have been environmentally better. Shell subsequently published an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development, supported by executive speeches reinforcing this commitment.
|
What entity supported Shell during the 1990s protests?
|
What entity supported Shell during the 1990s protests?
|
[
"What entity supported Shell during the 1990s protests?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the UK government"
],
"answer_start": [
208
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107571
|
5726390c38643c19005ad325
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the 1990s, protesters criticised the company's environmental record, particularly the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea. Despite support from the UK government, Shell reversed the decision under public pressure but maintained that sinking the platform would have been environmentally better. Shell subsequently published an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development, supported by executive speeches reinforcing this commitment.
|
Following the reversal of its decision, Shell published what?
|
Following the reversal of its decision, Shell published what?
|
[
"Following the reversal of its decision, Shell published what?"
] |
{
"text": [
"an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development"
],
"answer_start": [
387
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107572
|
5a629334f8d794001af1c102
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the 1990s, protesters criticised the company's environmental record, particularly the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea. Despite support from the UK government, Shell reversed the decision under public pressure but maintained that sinking the platform would have been environmentally better. Shell subsequently published an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development, supported by executive speeches reinforcing this commitment.
|
When was the Brent Spar platform disposed into the North Sea?
|
When was the Brent Spar platform disposed into the North Sea?
|
[
"When was the Brent Spar platform disposed into the North Sea?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107573
|
5a629334f8d794001af1c103
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the 1990s, protesters criticised the company's environmental record, particularly the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea. Despite support from the UK government, Shell reversed the decision under public pressure but maintained that sinking the platform would have been environmentally better. Shell subsequently published an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development, supported by executive speeches reinforcing this commitment.
|
What government opposed the Brent Spar platform?
|
What government opposed the Brent Spar platform?
|
[
"What government opposed the Brent Spar platform?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107574
|
5a629334f8d794001af1c104
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the 1990s, protesters criticised the company's environmental record, particularly the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea. Despite support from the UK government, Shell reversed the decision under public pressure but maintained that sinking the platform would have been environmentally better. Shell subsequently published an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development, supported by executive speeches reinforcing this commitment.
|
What did Shell admit was a poor environmental decision?
|
What did Shell admit was a poor environmental decision?
|
[
"What did Shell admit was a poor environmental decision?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107575
|
5a629334f8d794001af1c105
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the 1990s, protesters criticised the company's environmental record, particularly the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea. Despite support from the UK government, Shell reversed the decision under public pressure but maintained that sinking the platform would have been environmentally better. Shell subsequently published an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development, supported by executive speeches reinforcing this commitment.
|
What commitment did executives condemn?
|
What commitment did executives condemn?
|
[
"What commitment did executives condemn?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107576
|
5a629334f8d794001af1c106
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the 1990s, protesters criticised the company's environmental record, particularly the possible pollution caused by the proposed disposal of the Brent Spar platform into the North Sea. Despite support from the UK government, Shell reversed the decision under public pressure but maintained that sinking the platform would have been environmentally better. Shell subsequently published an unequivocal commitment to sustainable development, supported by executive speeches reinforcing this commitment.
|
What did protesters in the 1990s praise?
|
What did protesters in the 1990s praise?
|
[
"What did protesters in the 1990s praise?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107577
|
57263b9538643c19005ad345
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
In 1996, multiple groups filed lawsuits to hold Shell accountable for what?
|
In 1996, multiple groups filed lawsuits to hold Shell accountable for what?
|
[
"In 1996, multiple groups filed lawsuits to hold Shell accountable for what?"
] |
{
"text": [
"alleged human rights violations in Nigeria"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107578
|
57263b9538643c19005ad346
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
Shell was accused of participating in the execution of which southern Nigerian tribal leader?
|
Shell was accused of participating in the execution of which southern Nigerian tribal leader?
|
[
"Shell was accused of participating in the execution of which southern Nigerian tribal leader?"
] |
{
"text": [
"Ken Saro-Wiwa"
],
"answer_start": [
332
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107579
|
57263b9538643c19005ad347
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
In what year did Shell agree to settle the lawsuits filed in 1996?
|
In what year did Shell agree to settle the lawsuits filed in 1996?
|
[
"In what year did Shell agree to settle the lawsuits filed in 1996?"
] |
{
"text": [
"2009"
],
"answer_start": [
580
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107580
|
57263b9538643c19005ad348
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
For what amount did Shell agree to settle the 1996 lawsuits?
|
For what amount did Shell agree to settle the 1996 lawsuits?
|
[
"For what amount did Shell agree to settle the 1996 lawsuits?"
] |
{
"text": [
"$15.5m"
],
"answer_start": [
606
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107581
|
57263b9538643c19005ad349
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
In contrast to its agreement to settle the 1996 lawsuits, Shell refused to do what?
|
In contrast to its agreement to settle the 1996 lawsuits, Shell refused to do what?
|
[
"In contrast to its agreement to settle the 1996 lawsuits, Shell refused to do what?"
] |
{
"text": [
"accepted any liability over the allegations against it"
],
"answer_start": [
650
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107582
|
5a6293e0f8d794001af1c10c
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
When was Brian Anderson hanged?
|
When was Brian Anderson hanged?
|
[
"When was Brian Anderson hanged?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107583
|
5a6293e0f8d794001af1c10d
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
Brian Anderson was the leader of what tribe?
|
Brian Anderson was the leader of what tribe?
|
[
"Brian Anderson was the leader of what tribe?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107584
|
5a6293e0f8d794001af1c10e
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
What was Ken Saro-Wiwa accused of?
|
What was Ken Saro-Wiwa accused of?
|
[
"What was Ken Saro-Wiwa accused of?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107585
|
5a6293e0f8d794001af1c10f
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
How much did Shell pay to the Ogoni tribe?
|
How much did Shell pay to the Ogoni tribe?
|
[
"How much did Shell pay to the Ogoni tribe?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107586
|
5a6293e0f8d794001af1c110
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In the beginning of 1996, several human rights groups brought cases to hold Shell accountable for alleged human rights violations in Nigeria, including summary execution, crimes against humanity, torture, inhumane treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention. In particular, Shell stood accused of collaborating in the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other leaders of the Ogoni tribe of southern Nigeria, who were hanged in 1995 by Nigeria's then military rulers. The lawsuits were brought against Royal Dutch Shell and Brian Anderson, the head of its Nigerian operation. In 2009, Shell agreed to pay $15.5m in a legal settlement. Shell has not accepted any liability over the allegations against it.
|
When did Shell sue Nigeria?
|
When did Shell sue Nigeria?
|
[
"When did Shell sue Nigeria?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107587
|
57263cb938643c19005ad355
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
A 2010 leaked communication revealed that Shell claimed to have inserted what into which entities?
|
A 2010 leaked communication revealed that Shell claimed to have inserted what into which entities?
|
[
"A 2010 leaked communication revealed that Shell claimed to have inserted what into which entities?"
] |
{
"text": [
"staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107588
|
57263cb938643c19005ad356
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
The same leaked communication revealed Shell claimed to know what?
|
The same leaked communication revealed Shell claimed to know what?
|
[
"The same leaked communication revealed Shell claimed to know what?"
] |
{
"text": [
"\"everything that was being done in those ministries\""
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107589
|
57263cb938643c19005ad357
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
About what did the Shell executive boast in relation to the leaked communication?
|
About what did the Shell executive boast in relation to the leaked communication?
|
[
"About what did the Shell executive boast in relation to the leaked communication?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration"
],
"answer_start": [
277
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107590
|
57263cb938643c19005ad358
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
Documents released in 2009 showed that Shell made regular payments to which entity?
|
Documents released in 2009 showed that Shell made regular payments to which entity?
|
[
"Documents released in 2009 showed that Shell made regular payments to which entity?"
] |
{
"text": [
"the Nigerian military"
],
"answer_start": [
462
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107591
|
57263cb938643c19005ad359
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
For what purpose did Shell make regular payments to the entity cited in the documents released in 2009?
|
For what purpose did Shell make regular payments to the entity cited in the documents released in 2009?
|
[
"For what purpose did Shell make regular payments to the entity cited in the documents released in 2009?"
] |
{
"text": [
"to prevent protests"
],
"answer_start": [
493
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107592
|
5a629472f8d794001af1c116
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
When did Shell place informants in the Nigerian government?
|
When did Shell place informants in the Nigerian government?
|
[
"When did Shell place informants in the Nigerian government?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107593
|
5a629472f8d794001af1c117
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
Who boasted that Shell had forgotten about the invasion?
|
Who boasted that Shell had forgotten about the invasion?
|
[
"Who boasted that Shell had forgotten about the invasion?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107594
|
5a629472f8d794001af1c118
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
What year did the documents used in the court case come from?
|
What year did the documents used in the court case come from?
|
[
"What year did the documents used in the court case come from?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107595
|
5a629472f8d794001af1c119
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
What source of information from 2010 was not used in the court case?
|
What source of information from 2010 was not used in the court case?
|
[
"What source of information from 2010 was not used in the court case?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107596
|
5a629472f8d794001af1c11a
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
In 2010, a leaked cable revealed that Shell claims to have inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government and know "everything that was being done in those ministries", according to Shell's top executive in Nigeria. The same executive also boasted that the Nigerian government had forgotten about the extent of Shell's infiltration. Documents released in 2009 (but not used in the court case) reveal that Shell regularly made payments to the Nigerian military in order to prevent protests.
|
Why did the Nigerian military regularly make payments to Shell?
|
Why did the Nigerian military regularly make payments to Shell?
|
[
"Why did the Nigerian military regularly make payments to Shell?"
] |
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107597
|
57263dd1ec44d21400f3dc95
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 16 March 2012, 52 Greenpeace activists from five different countries boarded Fennica and Nordica, multipurpose icebreakers chartered to support Shell's drilling rigs near Alaska. Around the same time period, a reporter for Fortune magazine spoke with Edward Itta, an Inupiat Eskimo leader and the former mayor of the North Slope Borough, who expressed that he was conflicted about Shell's plans in the Arctic, as he was very concerned that an oil spill could destroy the Inupiat Eskimo's hunting-and-fishing culture, but his borough also received major tax revenue from oil and gas production; additionally, further revenue from energy activity was considered crucial to the future of the living standard in Itta's community.
|
How many Greenpeace activists boarded Fennica and Nordica in March 2012?
|
How many Greenpeace activists boarded Fennica and Nordica in March 2012?
|
[
"How many Greenpeace activists boarded Fennica and Nordica in March 2012?"
] |
{
"text": [
"52"
],
"answer_start": [
18
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107598
|
57263dd1ec44d21400f3dc96
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 16 March 2012, 52 Greenpeace activists from five different countries boarded Fennica and Nordica, multipurpose icebreakers chartered to support Shell's drilling rigs near Alaska. Around the same time period, a reporter for Fortune magazine spoke with Edward Itta, an Inupiat Eskimo leader and the former mayor of the North Slope Borough, who expressed that he was conflicted about Shell's plans in the Arctic, as he was very concerned that an oil spill could destroy the Inupiat Eskimo's hunting-and-fishing culture, but his borough also received major tax revenue from oil and gas production; additionally, further revenue from energy activity was considered crucial to the future of the living standard in Itta's community.
|
How many countries did the group of Greenpeace activists represent?
|
How many countries did the group of Greenpeace activists represent?
|
[
"How many countries did the group of Greenpeace activists represent?"
] |
{
"text": [
"five"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
}
|
gem-squad_v2-train-107599
|
57263dd1ec44d21400f3dc97
|
Royal_Dutch_Shell
|
On 16 March 2012, 52 Greenpeace activists from five different countries boarded Fennica and Nordica, multipurpose icebreakers chartered to support Shell's drilling rigs near Alaska. Around the same time period, a reporter for Fortune magazine spoke with Edward Itta, an Inupiat Eskimo leader and the former mayor of the North Slope Borough, who expressed that he was conflicted about Shell's plans in the Arctic, as he was very concerned that an oil spill could destroy the Inupiat Eskimo's hunting-and-fishing culture, but his borough also received major tax revenue from oil and gas production; additionally, further revenue from energy activity was considered crucial to the future of the living standard in Itta's community.
|
What types of vehicles were the Fennica and Nordica?
|
What types of vehicles were the Fennica and Nordica?
|
[
"What types of vehicles were the Fennica and Nordica?"
] |
{
"text": [
"multipurpose icebreakers"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.