archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
[deleted]
null
Interesting, I'm not familiar with the Win32 api, but I imaging powerful applications like anti-virus, graphic intense games, and database programs use the api heavily. I'm sure some applications even use undocumented api's too. If they're limiting the api that could be an interesting problem to watch unfold.
null
0
1316492024
False
0
c2l5rpc
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5rpc
t1_c2l5a5v
null
1427622368
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Norther
null
While LorenVS chose to add something interesting and relevant to the conversation, your comment did not. I am angry that you have received so many upvotes for polluting the conversation.
null
0
1316492227
False
0
c2l5sjp
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5sjp
t1_c2l5a1q
null
1427622379
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
soAsian
null
LOL, theregister.
null
0
1316492266
False
0
c2l5spl
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5spl
t3_kl1qp
null
1427622381
-21
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
munificent
null
Maybe you want different types of renderers too? Or maybe you don't want to mix the rendering logic into your shape classes? Or maybe you want to overload a method like `$` in jQuery: > jQuery( selector, [context] ) > > selectorA string containing a selector expression > > contextA DOM Element, Document, or jQuery to use as context > > jQuery( element ) > elementA DOM element to wrap in a jQuery object. > > jQuery( elementArray ) > elementArrayAn array containing a set of DOM elements to wrap in a jQuery object. > > jQuery( jQuery object ) > jQuery objectAn existing jQuery object to clone. > > jQuery()
null
0
1316492412
False
0
c2l5tb9
t3_kkbpe
null
t1_c2l5tb9
t1_c2l00y7
null
1427622389
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
happy-dude
null
Ugh -- I'll have to apologize then. I didn't understand the ramifications of the fix. Thanks for your comment. (Just a computing student here. I have never really coded outside of academics. I see that I still have much to learn; thanks again.)
null
0
1316492526
False
0
c2l5tto
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2l5tto
t1_c2l5pi2
null
1427622396
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
millstone
null
The switch is away from .NET. The story used to be that .NET is the future; now it's that .NET is a peer with other WinRT clients. I don't see where they said that most WinRT components will be written in .NET. In fact it says they did the opposite: "XAML was rewritten in native code."
null
0
1316492568
False
0
c2l5tzv
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5tzv
t1_c2l5bwq
null
1427622398
41
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
millstone
null
Do you think that defaulting to a tablet UI that's ill-suited for desktops is somehow more optimal for regular users? Many Windows users can't figure out how to launch IE if the icon gets deleted from the desktop.
null
0
1316492824
False
0
c2l5v2t
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5v2t
t1_c2l58er
null
1427622413
25
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
millstone
null
How does this make you feel: "There is no inter-app communication, apps have isolated storage, and interaction with system devices is limited to what is allowed by pre-defined "contracts" for which apps can be a consumer or a provider."
null
0
1316492888
False
0
c2l5vd6
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5vd6
t1_c2l5qg6
null
1427622417
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
adolfojp
null
Why?
null
0
1316493031
False
0
c2l5w05
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5w05
t1_c2l58ln
null
1427622426
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Sc4Freak
null
Since when is the Win32 API being limited? Regular desktop applications are and will always be supported. If you don't like Metro or WinRT, then you're free to continue developing your plain old desktop applications like you've always done! > Though COM is awful on it's own grounds. COM is a necessary evil. It's the only way you can provide a standard OO interface to multiple languages. But even though WinRT is based on COM, it doesn't mean you have to actually deal with COM. C# and VB.NET see WinRT COM objects as plain old CLR classes. C++ has the optional C++/CX extensions which provide syntactic sugar over COM. But apparently, people don't like *that* either.
null
0
1316493058
False
0
c2l5w4z
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5w4z
t1_c2l5a5v
null
1427622427
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
awesome7777
null
Firstly the article is bunk. It's misleading! 1. Your old apps will still work with Windows 8, And so will your old API calls! Otherwise the old apps wouldn't work! Think about it! 2. What the article is referencing is the new client side permission structure for the Metro UI apps. They're HTML based, and essentially run from a browser. Hence the need for a limited security model. So how do you get around these permission things? If you use your brains you'll notice the whole web world is going service orientated. You'll now write web services (which are fully fledged first class citizens), and your front end will communicate via AJAX calls to these web services. Problem solved! These could be client to client, and I'm sure Windows 8 will support very easy to install web services without the need for full blown IIS.
null
0
1316493086
False
0
c2l5w98
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5w98
t3_kl1qp
null
1427622429
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
soAsian
null
>I just left a job as a .NET programmer to work as a linux server admin and that gotta to do with the topic because ????
null
0
1316493094
False
0
c2l5wai
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5wai
t1_c2l58ln
null
1427622429
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
BeowulfShaeffer
null
Man I feel old whenever I talk to programmers who never used Win32.
null
0
1316493104
False
0
c2l5wc8
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5wc8
t1_c2l5rpc
null
1427622429
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Is Chris 'Fat Bastard' Sells (presented some coding at BUILD) the same guy as the young thin Chris Sells that delivered the Developmentor COM and original .NET courses back in ooohh, 2002 or so? Really really nice guy btw. Highly brainy. I'm still using my free copy of ATL internals to raise my monitor to a better height...
null
0
1316493175
False
0
c2l5wmo
t3_kk7c6
null
t1_c2l5wmo
t1_c2ky5n2
null
1427622434
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
generalT
null
what do they mean by "apps"? because i doubt they mean an executable that i create in visual studio 2010 (or the next version), targeting the .NET 4.0 framework. i highly, *highly* doubt that.
null
0
1316493213
False
0
c2l5wsi
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l5wsi
t1_c2l5vd6
null
1427622436
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
awesome7777
null
I would love to jump to 59:00 but the video is silverlight hosted, so the controls don't work as well as flash!
null
0
1316493216
False
0
c2l5wt5
t3_kip3s
null
t1_c2l5wt5
t3_kip3s
null
1427622436
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rachelbythebay
null
Yeah, and how about a test to catch whatever it was, in case it comes back?
null
0
1316493425
False
0
c2l5xqm
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2l5xqm
t1_c2l5pi2
null
1427622448
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
crinos666
null
This is not necessarily the case, if the project is run with appropriate approvals from people who *do* have the bigger picture(Linux kernel for example). Many people find little bugs, these are very easily screened by someone with a bigger view of how and why a particular function returns this value or that value and it ultimately gets approved by someone higher up the chain, without that person(shall we say "expert") having to screen the tens of thousands of lines of code themselves. If a project just blindly accepts patches and applies them without sufficient checks and balances, it's nothing to do with the fact that it's open source, it's just a badly run software project...
null
0
1316493533
False
0
c2l5y8j
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2l5y8j
t1_c2l5pi2
null
1427622455
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jyper
null
with a proprietary codec only available in ie/safari. (And doesn't it complain about updating th browser if you have firefox/chrome/opera w/out silverlight?)
null
0
1316493835
False
0
c2l5zhu
t3_kii9z
null
t1_c2l5zhu
t1_c2kmslu
null
1427622472
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MaikB
null
Back in time?
null
0
1316494045
False
0
c2l60cm
t3_kkwd9
null
t1_c2l60cm
t1_c2l4xfu
null
1427622482
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
shieldforyoureyes
null
No, I still have access to it. I shot that photo in 2007. I've gotten a lot better at taking technical photos since then.
null
0
1316494712
False
0
c2l62ys
t3_kkwd9
null
t1_c2l62ys
t1_c2l60cm
null
1427622516
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tanishaj
null
I know it is subtle but I think he is being swayed by this sentence, "It was obvious at BUILD that it is C# developers that dominate on Microsoft's platform – sessions on the language were packed to overflowing – and it is likely that more WinRT code will be written in C# than in any other language."
null
0
1316494860
False
0
c2l63iy
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l63iy
t1_c2l5tzv
null
1427622524
24
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bonch
null
It won't be out for another couple of years, so there's no way yet to precisely tell what the hardware requirements will be.
null
0
1316494899
False
0
c2l63o1
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l63o1
t1_c2l5bld
null
1427622526
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bonch
null
> Your old apps will still work with Windows 8, And so will your old API calls! Otherwise the old apps wouldn't work! Think about it! Nobody said otherwise.
null
0
1316494917
False
0
c2l63qq
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l63qq
t1_c2l5w98
null
1427622527
14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bonch
null
> I agree that the choice to make a tablet UI the default on a desktop OS is suboptimal for us power-users. "Power-users" running desktops are a niche compared to the booming tablet market. Desktop PCs are on their way out as mainstream computing devices.
null
0
1316494976
False
0
c2l63yj
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l63yj
t1_c2l58er
null
1427622530
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bonch
null
They're not fucking anybody over, old Win32 apps continue to run just fine, and nobody cares what "PC programmers" want anyway, because the hot markets right now are tablets, phones, and game consoles. Open your eyes and see where the industry is headed. Appliance computing is here.
null
0
1316495035
False
0
c2l646o
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l646o
t1_c2l5a5v
null
1427622532
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bonch
null
> How does this make you feel: Pretty happy that they're implementing the successful iOS security model. Some of you critics are just terrified of change.
null
0
1316495065
False
0
c2l64ad
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l64ad
t1_c2l5vd6
null
1427622534
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tanishaj
null
I think the author of this "bunk" article agrees with you more than you think. . Metro apps are not all HTML based but they will be sandboxed much the same. I agree that Microsoft seems to be pushing the smarts to "the cloud" with clients becoming prettier and prettier dumb terminals.
null
0
1316495079
False
0
c2l64cd
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l64cd
t1_c2l5w98
null
1427622539
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
scragar
null
Works well on a mobile device as well, very impressive.
null
0
1316495085
False
0
c2l64da
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l64da
t1_c2l0hsh
null
1427622539
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tanishaj
null
It remains to be seen how "regular" users will fare. I guess if they can use their iPads they can use Windows 8. The removal of the "file system" while a horror to me is probably a giant usability win for your average Windows user though.
null
0
1316495194
False
0
c2l64t8
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l64t8
t1_c2l5v2t
null
1427622541
29
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tanishaj
null
Hey, don't forget F#. :-)
null
0
1316495245
False
0
c2l650g
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l650g
t1_c2l59dx
null
1427622543
20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bonch
null
> I don't think the claim sounds entirely unreasonable either. That's hardly reason enough to make the declaration this article is making about popularity.
null
0
1316495272
False
0
c2l6544
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2l6544
t1_c2l1eld
null
1427622545
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tanishaj
null
You can target "Metro" or you can target the classic desktop. The full .NET 4 framework can only be used for "desktop" apps. You cannot run those programs from "Metro". So, depending on where you want your code to run, it can be a pretty big limitation.
null
0
1316495406
False
0
c2l65mh
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l65mh
t1_c2l5wsi
null
1427622554
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316495491
False
0
c2l65ys
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l65ys
t1_c2l646o
null
1427622556
22
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316495502
False
0
c2l65zy
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l65zy
t3_kl1qp
null
1427622556
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bonch
null
Keep in mind, though, that we already have a developer preview.
null
0
1316495509
False
0
c2l6611
t3_kip3s
null
t1_c2l6611
t1_c2kjzet
null
1427622557
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
vplatt
null
You're right. You **are** a horrible troll.
null
0
1316495560
False
0
c2l667x
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l667x
t1_c2l58ln
null
1427622558
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
scragar
null
Happens a lot because of the popular $ usage as a function name, given the huge number of available special characters that could be used it's kind of sad.
null
0
1316495566
False
0
c2l668x
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l668x
t1_c2l0dpp
null
1427622558
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hobophobe
null
The blog didn't include the bug that actually had the patch and review, so I dug it up: [Bugzilla@Mozilla: Bug 673403: don't rely on non empty result from nsAccessible::GetParent()](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673403). Always best to throw the bug number at people (if you know it/can find it).
null
0
1316495768
False
0
c2l6712
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2l6712
t3_kl5hl
null
1427622569
16
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
And how do you know it won't just be a theme you turn on and off? Tablet installs would have the theme turned on by default. Desktop installs have the traditional theme turned on by default. This is not very difficult.
null
0
1316496053
False
0
c2l682e
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l682e
t1_c2l50he
null
1427622583
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ulber
null
That is for the new metro apps. Nothing is being taken away from desktop applications.
null
0
1316496506
False
0
c2l69r4
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l69r4
t1_c2l5vd6
null
1427622606
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kragensitaker
null
> From the snippet it's impossible to tell if this is ok. That's true, but apparently someone with commit access had already decided that yes, it was okay, since that was the fix in tip.
null
0
1316496609
False
0
c2l6a59
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2l6a59
t1_c2l5pi2
null
1427622611
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ulber
null
They're not limiting that api. That would mean that old programs would stop working. Desktop applications will continue to have unrestricted access to Win32.
null
0
1316496700
False
0
c2l6ahi
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6ahi
t1_c2l5rpc
null
1427622615
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
> nobody cares what "PC programmers" want anyway, because the hot markets right now are tablets, phones, and game consoles. Where do you think development takes place? All the programs that run on your "appliance computers" are developed on desktops. You seriously think any serious development is going to happen on a tablet or a phone? Perhaps you are the one that needs to open your eyes. There are millions of developers in this world, even if desktops become solely a platform for development it would still be a decent market. You also have to take into account the fact that a device with no "apps" is effectively worthless. Keeping developers happy and offering a decent, well documented development environment is usually what makes or breaks a particular device.
null
0
1316497060
False
0
c2l6bs4
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6bs4
t1_c2l646o
null
1427622636
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dkogan
null
Just FYI, the Linux kernel source has included a script that does this for many years now: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/scripts/checkstack.pl
null
0
1316497332
False
0
c2l6cro
t3_kkih6
null
t1_c2l6cro
t3_kkih6
null
1427622645
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dyydvujbxs
null
Eh, you can turn off Aero in Win 7 but what's left is messed up. Messed up enough that I finally stopped using Classic when I got Win7. Win8 with Metro might be similar, where everything looks a bit messed up when Metro is off.
null
0
1316497631
False
0
c2l6drh
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6drh
t1_c2l682e
null
1427622658
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mhd420
null
Aren't the system requirements the same as Windows 7? They made a big deal about it during the keynote.
null
0
1316497649
False
0
c2l6dtw
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6dtw
t1_c2l5bld
null
1427622660
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
That's not exactly the same; those languages fail at run-time instead of compile time if the type checking fails. Of course, they don't even have a 'compile-time'.
null
0
1316497737
False
0
c2l6e5f
t3_kikut
null
t1_c2l6e5f
t1_c2kyr86
null
1427622663
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tau-lepton
null
Do you mean booming iPad market? Sales of android tablets have been lackluster, HP had to practically give away their WebOS tablet, and windows tablet sales are virtually non-existent. Apple is going to have to make several mistakes before Microsoft can compete on the tablet.
null
0
1316497839
False
0
c2l6ej7
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6ej7
t1_c2l63yj
null
1427622668
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
widyakumara
null
A little bit late but perhaps it's usefull for someone that will read this in the future: [Firefox 6 no longer executes javascript URLs](http://www.reddit.com/r/web_design/comments/kkh2b/firefox_6_no_longer_executes_javascript_urls/)
null
0
1316497856
False
0
c2l6el6
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l6el6
t1_c2l4vl8
null
1427622670
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tau-lepton
null
We haven't seen how easy win8 is to actually use yet. How does Microsoft make money on tablet sales? It had better be by locking people into Exchange and Office.
null
0
1316497977
False
0
c2l6ezq
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6ezq
t1_c2l64t8
null
1427622674
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Gooootcha.
null
0
1316498150
False
0
c2l6flz
t3_kjja4
null
t1_c2l6flz
t1_c2l2hd2
null
1427622682
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Shizka
null
Awesome :) Thank you very much!
null
0
1316498156
False
0
c2l6fmv
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l6fmv
t1_c2l4vl8
null
1427622682
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
heroofhyr
null
I'll give you my two cents from ten years of work experience with large codebases and fifteen years total as a programmer. Maybe you can benefit from them (or not) before you're out of school and your programming habits become less and less susceptible to change: Essentially, this is the difference between a good programmer and a *good-enough* programmer. If the original author who created the bug in the first place made an assumption that GetParent() always has to return a valid pointer (which IMO should have returned a reference if that were the case, not a pointer--the fact that it returns a pointer tells me the designer of the function either wasn't sure if it always had--or definitely knew that sometimes it didn't have--a valid parent, or else he was just sloppy and/or required to conform to some old-fashioned coding conventions and every function returns a pointer whether it should or not), then ignoring the NULL case is not really fixing the problem--it's merely pushing it away and letting it pop up somewhere else later down the line. This is the kind of bug-fix you make 1 hour before the code freeze when you've got no other choice. You swallow your shame and *commit*, then reopen the bug after the release so you don't forget about it. It's definitely not something you should do when there's enough time to figure out what's really causing the problem. Recognizing the possibility that you haven't really fixed a problem is what will lead you ultimately to having a much more stable application than just saying to yourself, "Ehhh, close enough," and checking in whatever modification stops the crash. --------------------------------------- Edit: the fact that this bug-fix was bug-fixing another bug-fix leads me to assume that the original bug-fixer had a valid parent in his case, assumed it was always true, tested his single scenario against the fix, and then submitted the patch. Later on, someone else (the OP) found a scenario where the fix caused more problems because it was based on assumptions, removed the assumption, and now there's a fix for both problems. Those sorts of 2nd generation bug-fixes are usually safe (I would still check to be sure), because the problem is not indicative of a larger design flaw, but merely a logical error in the thinking of the programmer (in this case, assuming the parent is always non-NULL). **TL;DR** the second bug-fix looks like it was not spackling over a gaping hole in the Firefox drywall, but merely over a hairline fracture created by another, earlier spackling knife. Whether that earlier spackler was hiding a gaping hole remains to be seen.
null
0
1316498291
True
0
c2l6g23
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2l6g23
t1_c2l5tto
null
1427622688
19
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Well, I think we should wait and see before proclaiming it's crap.
null
0
1316498357
False
0
c2l6g9v
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6g9v
t1_c2l6drh
null
1427622690
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Rodh257
null
They have a big emphasis on low overhead and battery life, especially when running in Metro mode (which is what ARM based tablets will be doing). Go look at the keynote.
null
0
1316498444
False
0
c2l6gku
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6gku
t1_c2l5bld
null
1427622694
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
noupvotesplease
null
Appropriate username is appropriate.
null
0
1316498623
False
0
c2l6h46
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6h46
t1_c2l65ys
null
1427622702
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rabootcha
null
Crawl and screenshot the web
null
0
1316498735
False
0
c2l6hht
t3_kks00
null
t1_c2l6hht
t1_c2l5nad
null
1427622707
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
babazka
null
It is a long-standing tradition for Windows family to consume the majority of hardware resources. I don't remember a single Windows version which has not been called memory hog at the time of release. As for tablets, the ARM version of Windows 8 is going to be Metro-only (read: no background applications, no multitasking), which should lower its battery consumption to the level of iOS.
null
0
1316498898
False
0
c2l6i0j
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6i0j
t1_c2l5bld
null
1427622713
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
drowsap
null
No, it's actually ajax and web 2.0
null
0
1316499014
False
0
c2l6iei
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l6iei
t1_c2l2du6
null
1427622718
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ttsiodras
null
Interesting, didn't know this - thanks!
null
0
1316499303
False
0
c2l6jb4
t3_kkih6
null
t1_c2l6jb4
t1_c2l2hja
null
1427622731
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ttsiodras
null
:-)
null
0
1316499315
False
0
c2l6jck
t3_kkih6
null
t1_c2l6jck
t1_c2l359t
null
1427622731
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
You mean "C/C++/WinRT" right? Because C++/WinRT is "just C++" in the same way that "C/C++" is "just C". The problem is when they add extensions to C++ in order to make this work - even if it compiles to X86 assembler, it's not actually C++ any longer. Hell, it may be wonderful and C++0xwhatever may make all these new things standard. But until there's some reason to believe that's going to happen, there's a problem. They've designed WinRT specifically so it could be used from Visual Studio - not from "multiple languages". Well, that's what I understand so far, based on limited information. If, in fact, it is possible to use WinRT from *standard* C++ then I'll be suitably impressed and pleased.
null
0
1316499347
False
0
c2l6jg1
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6jg1
t1_c2l59dx
null
1427622732
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ttsiodras
null
No, it only detects the "standalone" stack usage: there's no creation of a call-graph, or detection of recursion in any depth, or "deep" (i.e. cumulative) stack usage - that takes into account the call graph.
null
0
1316499398
False
0
c2l6jli
t3_kkih6
null
t1_c2l6jli
t1_c2l6cro
null
1427622737
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
stealthzeus
null
No native database connector? No I/O except local storage? This is gonna be interesting.
null
0
1316499433
False
0
c2l6jpl
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6jpl
t3_kl1qp
null
1427622736
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cosmo7
null
I have no problem with Win32 going away. Ooh here's the function you want; it has seventeen arguments, half of which you've never heard of.
null
0
1316499519
False
0
c2l6jyz
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6jyz
t1_c2l5wc8
null
1427622738
14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dubman42
null
Nice try, 2nd guy from Microsoft PR department.
null
0
1316499577
False
0
c2l6k6p
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6k6p
t1_c2l5sjp
null
1427622741
-12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
HardlyWorkingDotOrg
null
Conclusion being that Android is more fucked up and therefore developers require more help for everyday questions? Yep, good conclusion right there.
null
0
1316499678
False
0
c2l6kih
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2l6kih
t1_c2l35me
null
1427622745
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
adolfojp
null
>They're HTML based, and essentially run from a browser. False. (Actually, partially correct) Metro apps can be written in three different ways. The common denominator is the WinRT APIs. 1. Native C++ with XAML as its presentation language. This is the C++/Win32 replacement. 2. Managed .NET languages like C# and VB with XAML as its presentation language. These apps are coded WPF and Silverlight style. 3. JavaScript with HTML and CSS as its presentation languages. This is to lure new developers to the platform. Here is a useful diagram: http://i.imgur.com/Jq5pN.jpg The new stack is on the left and the current one is on the right.
null
0
1316499681
False
0
c2l6kir
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6kir
t1_c2l5w98
null
1427622745
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
HardlyWorkingDotOrg
null
You mean the marketshare where every 50 dollar Android 1.x handset factors in? Where customers aren't even aware that their device runs android or that they didn't even care? Where Android wasn't the sellingpoint but rather the low price tag? If you want a representative statistic, you would pull numbers from both platforms where the hardware specs are at least in the same wheelhouse. Just leave out the bargain basement. Otherwise, these marketshare statistics say nothing at all.
null
0
1316499854
False
0
c2l6l1p
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2l6l1p
t1_c2l1hc4
null
1427622752
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mistralol
null
It you look carefully at it you will see that they have all the old stuff there and have just added to it with an optional UI which is really built for portable devices but also runs on the windows desktop.
null
0
1316499963
False
0
c2l6ldr
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6ldr
t3_kl1qp
null
1427622757
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mistralol
null
There are multiple embedded db's that can be plugged into an application. I am sure they won't be hard to make work.
null
0
1316500040
False
0
c2l6llm
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6llm
t1_c2l6jpl
null
1427622759
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
robeph
null
LOL, at the people who upvote this contentless irrelevant comment and move it up above content filled technical comments that actually are worthy of being higher on the comment hierarchy so as people can see them.
null
0
1316500173
False
0
c2l6m04
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6m04
t1_c2l5spl
null
1427622765
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
robeph
null
Kind of like [this one](http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/kl1qp/microsofts_highrisk_windows_8_net_switch/c2l5spl) (which people for whatever ridiculous reason, upvoted). It's crap like this /r/programming. I wish mods would spend time deleting shit like this. Dubman42's comment is exactly the usage of the downvote arrow, on the other hand the downvoting of LorenVS's comment is the exact opposite.
null
0
1316500263
True
0
c2l6m9p
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6m9p
t1_c2l5sjp
null
1427622769
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
zhivago
null
Just compile to javascript.
null
0
1316500613
False
0
c2l6n86
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l6n86
t1_c2l03bv
null
1427622782
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
JasonMaloney101
null
> If, in fact, it is possible to use WinRT from standard C++ then I'll be suitably impressed and pleased. The "extensions" they've added are just syntactic sugar around traditional COM. You're fine with ISO C++.
null
0
1316501183
False
0
c2l6oyl
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6oyl
t1_c2l6jg1
null
1427622807
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
stealthzeus
null
No I was talking about accessing a remote data source (thin client). In the article it seems that the only way to do such a thing is via a web interface, not a SQL database connection.
null
0
1316501397
False
0
c2l6pkv
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6pkv
t1_c2l6llm
null
1427622813
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
harlows_monkeys
null
As I said, I don't know how the new law modifies this, so the following will be under the old law. Here's one way you could get prior use rights without your prior use being prior art: Let's say you are a manufacturer of something. You have a factory that uses various machines to manufacture the goods you sell. You invent a new synthetic oil that greatly reduces the wear and maintenance costs of machines it is used in. You manufacture this oil in your factory and use it on your machines to cut costs and get an advantage over your competitors. You do not make this new oil public, or apply for a patent. You keep it as a trade secret. Your invention and use of the oil would not be prior art against a subsequence inventor of the same oil. The key is that prior art has to be public. Things kept secret aren't prior art.
null
0
1316501607
False
0
c2l6q6w
t3_khvyw
null
t1_c2l6q6w
t1_c2kywu5
null
1427622821
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
random_ramdomness_4
null
You can still paste it in the firebug console without the 'javascript:' part =) edit: You can even probably paste it inside one of those code boxes and click run and it will probably work.
null
0
1316501740
True
0
c2l6qk8
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l6qk8
t1_c2l6el6
null
1427622827
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Jigsus
null
And that's why they now make the IE icon humongous right on the front page.
null
0
1316501917
False
0
c2l6r1k
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6r1k
t1_c2l5v2t
null
1427622834
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Jigsus
null
They are less than W7 even.
null
0
1316502066
False
0
c2l6rh0
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6rh0
t1_c2l6dtw
null
1427622838
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Sc4Freak
null
It's been discussed extensively on /r/programming over the past few days. C++/CX is *completely optional*. WinRT is built on top of COM. You can access COM like you always have been able to - which means that you can access WinRT from *any language* that supports COM (including ISO standard C++). Heck, you can access WinRT from Haskell or Java if you want, because there's COM support available for both those languages. C++/CX is nothing more than syntactic sugar over COM to make it easier to use. If you don't want to use these extensions, remove the /Zw switch when compiling and you'll be back to using standard ISO C++ (and manually managing your COM objects). So, no. When people say you can access WinRT from C++, **they really mean standard ISO C++**. The C++/CX extensions are nothing more than optional syntactic sugar.
null
0
1316502132
True
0
c2l6rnp
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6rnp
t1_c2l6jg1
null
1427622840
21
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jkff
null
Honestly, "The Haskell School of Expression" didn't change the way I think about programming - Richard Bird's "Introduction to Functional Programming Using Haskell" did, but I admit, my way of thought was already unrecoverably changed by the time I started reading Hudak's book.
null
0
1316502365
True
0
c2l6sa6
t3_kkegr
null
t1_c2l6sa6
t1_c2l36iu
null
1427622915
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pretzel-wagon
null
Well, at least you have friends with extra money to needlessly toss around!
null
0
1316502784
False
0
c2l6tbo
t3_kip3s
null
t1_c2l6tbo
t1_c2l071w
null
1427622929
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Gotebe
null
I am not surprised that MS had reached back for COM. If Windows 8 is to run on all kinds of ARM - based devices, you're bound to expect cheap ones that might struggle running .NET runtime and full-blown Windows. So there, we'll get WinRT (native) + thin layer of .NET (interop + app code), or even straight native there, too. App code is unlikely to be javascript, too. Not too shabby if you ask me.
null
0
1316503158
False
0
c2l6u9m
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6u9m
t3_kl1qp
null
1427622949
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Otis_Inf
null
Won't work, as these databases all need File I/O of some sort. WinRT / Metro apps rely on services for their data, similar to what Silverlight apps do. This fits in their strategy of 'services in the cloud for your data, the apps on your device using them'. Build was mainly about those apps, but the interesting part is of course the service: what is used to build these, and as MS doesn't have a large monopoly on the server side, it's to be seen whether large droves of developers will stick with MS for server-side development.
null
0
1316503220
False
0
c2l6ufj
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6ufj
t1_c2l6llm
null
1427622944
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
elperroborrachotoo
null
**for Metro-style Apps**
null
0
1316503238
False
0
c2l6uh7
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6uh7
t1_c2l6jpl
null
1427622944
48
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Otis_Inf
null
If you ignore Metro for a second, you'll see nothing really changed that much. So if you're developing software which won't be used through a fingerpainting device/interface, there's nothing to worry about, as nothing really changed. Metro and WinRT, it's to be seen whether it will succeed. Remember Avalon and Windows Vista? It would be the new way to develop client-side UI's. Avalon later on was renamed to WPF, and curiously, 'WPF' was the acronym no-one spoke of at Build.
null
0
1316503378
False
0
c2l6ute
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6ute
t1_c2l50he
null
1427622948
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
elperroborrachotoo
null
What makes you a "Developer" in that context? Probably you have to be in one of their partner programs, but that's not clear.
null
0
1316503624
False
0
c2l6vdr
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l6vdr
t3_kl7h0
null
1427622957
17
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Antiuniverse
null
I only just started learning JS this month, but I feel like they omitted a pattern which greatly diminishes the risk posed by invoking a constructor function without 'new': var Foo = function() { if (!(this instanceof Foo)) return new Foo(); // ... }; Or maybe, if you'd prefer, you can explode then and there instead of trying to quietly Do The Right Thing. Either way, it seems worth handling in some capacity. Is there a downside to this approach that I'm not aware of?
null
0
1316503683
True
0
c2l6vj5
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l6vj5
t3_kketr
null
1427622957
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316503832
False
0
c2l6vxj
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6vxj
t1_c2l6g9v
null
1427622970
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316504346
False
0
c2l6x55
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6x55
t1_c2l6h46
null
1427622978
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
infinull
null
You created... A PDF from an HTML file to read on your kindle. You know mobi-pocket's are just encoded HTML right? Use an epub editor like Sigil to load the HTML, then use calibre to convert the epub file to mobipocket. (I went with Sony, so I don't have to do this step.) Or better yet, just use instapaper.com that'll do that all automatically.
null
0
1316504389
False
0
c2l6x94
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l6x94
t1_c2l0a8k
null
1427622979
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ILikeBumblebees
null
Of course. Myths *about* raytracing. *Four A.M. brain expected to see renderings of Perseus in Minos' labyrinth.* Edit: and the same muddled brain confused Perseus with Theseus.
null
0
1316504518
True
0
c2l6xjz
t3_kldfr
null
t1_c2l6xjz
t3_kldfr
null
1427622983
32
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
A_for_Anonymous
null
It's retarded, too. Who said it's not? Also, Win32 is one of the worst quality, most obnoxious APIs ever created.
null
0
1316504601
False
0
c2l6xqi
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2l6xqi
t1_c2l3jhd
null
1427622986
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I thought the same too, until I saw the horrible mess necessary to use COM with C++. There is no chance anyone will ever use that, except maybe some code generation tools, and I don't even see the reason there. Thanks for the downvotes! The fun thing is that I actually check my facts and yes, I'm right: http://www.interact-sw.co.uk/iangblog/2011/09/16/real-native-winrt
null
0
1316504919
True
0
c2l6ygg
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6ygg
t1_c2l6rnp
null
1427622995
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
sumsarus
null
Can't tell if you're trolling or just really stupid.
null
0
1316504968
False
0
c2l6yk5
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6yk5
t1_c2l6jyz
null
1427622997
-11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
firebelly
null
Pay 99$ a year. Then you can make/sell games/apps for xbox/wp7, and eventually win8. I bet it will be the same system in place now, but with win8 ability. And this is for metro apps only. They can stop normal windows apps from what I understand. You will still be able to build apps in visual studio and run them.
null
0
1316505005
False
0
c2l6ymq
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l6ymq
t1_c2l6vdr
null
1427622997
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Meanwhile on Linux everything is still a chaotic mess where every language binding has to be created manually, because every language creator thinks his little toy language is the most important thing out there...
null
0
1316505062
False
0
c2l6ys3
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6ys3
t3_kl1qp
null
1427623010
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
captain-asshat
null
Metro apps have local isolated storage, just not full file system access. Embedded db's will work fine.
null
0
1316505133
False
0
c2l6yyg
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6yyg
t1_c2l6ufj
null
1427623006
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null