archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
Shinhan
null
Unity, Gnome 3, now even Windows 8? WTF?
null
0
1316505436
False
0
c2l6znq
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l6znq
t1_c2l50he
null
1427623015
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Yeah but the stats he was showing was dealing more with desktops only.
null
0
1316505545
False
0
c2l6zws
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2l6zws
t1_c2l4cla
null
1427623017
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
elperroborrachotoo
null
> Pay 99$ a year. Then you can make/sell games/apps for xbox/wp7, and eventually win8. Makes sense somehow. The important parts s probably the contract you sign and the contact information they get. Yeah, I don't see any *need* for jailbreaking, unless Metro Style is available *only* in the sandbox.
null
0
1316505668
False
0
c2l706k
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l706k
t1_c2l6ymq
null
1427623025
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
thomasz
null
I hate that one with pure passion. It's 2011 and it still doesn't know what to do with the exif orientation tag.
null
0
1316505989
False
0
c2l70uf
t3_kjf91
null
t1_c2l70uf
t1_c2kzq9c
null
1427623030
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kristovaher
null
Who would design an API -without- developers in mind to begin with? What would the point be?
null
0
1316506110
False
0
c2l712r
t3_kkfsg
null
t1_c2l712r
t3_kkfsg
null
1427623039
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rjberry
null
Who's still seriously building apps for Windows when the technologies you're using are deprecated every couple of years ...
null
0
1316506188
False
0
c2l718i
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l718i
t3_kl7h0
null
1427623032
-18
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
millstone
null
Just like Apple if Apple tried to make iOS run on your desktop machine.
null
0
1316506274
False
0
c2l71eh
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l71eh
t1_c2l5pdn
null
1427623034
22
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rsynnott
null
Anecdotal, but in most smaller software companies (where developers can often choose what they want to use), I'm seeing a more or less even mix of Linux and MacOS, at the moment; almost no Windows. Now, these are UNIX-oriented, shops, but really, these days, that describes nearly everyone not actively targeting the Windows desktop.
null
0
1316506558
False
0
c2l71wd
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2l71wd
t1_c2l2jh7
null
1427623040
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rsynnott
null
> You can even subtract some users from the windows category because Android development can be done on OS X and Linux too I'd assume that the vast bulk of Android development _is_ done on Linux or MacOS. Windows does not appear to be popular as a desktop OS for programmers these days.
null
0
1316506615
False
0
c2l720a
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2l720a
t1_c2l2pfv
null
1427623042
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rsynnott
null
> Why don't we just look at market share, where android overtook iOS several months ago? Er, no. Android overtook the _iPhone_ several months ago. As of the beginning of August, there were roughly 130m Android devices vs 110m iPhones and 200m iOS devices total; it's not clear in any case how many were still in use. Remember, Apple sells a _lot_ of iPod Touches.
null
0
1316506727
False
0
c2l728w
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2l728w
t1_c2l1hc4
null
1427623045
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
millstone
null
> Why don't we just look at market share, where android overtook iOS several months ago? [Or maybe not](http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/04/19/a-look-at-ipad-users-apple-still-trouncing-android/?mod=e2tw)
null
0
1316506748
False
0
c2l72ag
t3_kkp4z
null
t1_c2l72ag
t1_c2l1hc4
null
1427623046
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
MaRmARk0
null
Flash is working everywhere except Apple's portable devices. HTML5's <audio> tag won't work in IE5, IE6, IE7...etc. so in this case it's better to use Flash because it can cover many different browsers and systems. But that's just my opinion. :)
null
0
1316506959
False
0
c2l72pm
t3_kkod0
null
t1_c2l72pm
t1_c2l346a
null
1427623051
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Jigsus
null
Nobody has announced the 99/year subscription. My guess is that it's just an option in the install.
null
0
1316507094
False
0
c2l72zx
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l72zx
t1_c2l6ymq
null
1427623056
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
justguessmyusername
null
Cant wait for FF7. Getting sick of FF6.
null
0
1316507154
False
0
c2l7341
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2l7341
t3_kl5hl
null
1427623056
-6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
LargeDickington
null
Call your UX designer again, *I* have something to show her, lol
null
0
1316507270
False
0
c2l73br
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l73br
t1_c2l1zvi
null
1427623059
-11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Poddster
null
WTF is a Metro app or 'side loading'?
null
0
1316507596
False
0
c2l73xw
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l73xw
t3_kl7h0
null
1427623068
13
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Ahri
null
> If anything I see this story as an example of how more eyes don't actually help but can hurt. It's not public-writable; there's no "hurt" involved: your summary sucks.
null
0
1316507795
False
0
c2l74bi
t3_kl5hl
null
t1_c2l74bi
t1_c2l5pi2
null
1427623073
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Sc4Freak
null
That's the same "horrible mess" that you *always* have to deal with when using COM. This is hardly anything unique or new to WinRT, and COM's idiosyncracies are precisely why C++/CX was introduced in the first place!
null
0
1316507816
False
0
c2l74ct
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l74ct
t1_c2l6ygg
null
1427623073
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
A Metro app is a Windows 8 application that runs under the new user interface. It looks a lot like a Windows Phone application and is highly optimized for touch screens. Ideally an application written in this style will work just as well on a little iPad-like tablet as it does on a large screen desktop compter. Rules: 1. Everything is async, so devs have to try hard to make applications that lock up. 2. Only the application you are looking at is running. Everything in the background is suspended. This helps with performance and batter life. 3. Only one application on the screen at a time. No overlapping windows. 4. Applications are bundled just like they are in OS X or on smart phones. Applications can on longer spread themselves all over the registery and file system. 5. May be written in C++, .NET, or JavaScript. All three have equal access to the operating system and hardware. Older applications will run unchanged in "desktop" mode.
null
0
1316508121
False
0
c2l74wh
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l74wh
t1_c2l73xw
null
1427623087
43
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
grauenwolf
null
Side loading means installing an application onto a locked-down platform without going through the "app store" for that platform. Originally it referred to iPhone, but these days everyone is playing the lock-down game.
null
0
1316508285
False
0
c2l757t
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l757t
t1_c2l73xw
null
1427623085
21
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
"Side loading" is a neologism for what we've always known as "installing". It basically means you have to go through a centralized app store unless you're a developer or enterprise customer.
null
0
1316508317
False
0
c2l759t
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l759t
t1_c2l73xw
null
1427623085
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
"Jailbreaking" a PC. Sigh...
null
0
1316508410
False
0
c2l75f5
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l75f5
t1_c2l5rd6
null
1427623087
56
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Poddster
null
Thanks
null
0
1316508625
False
0
c2l75sf
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l75sf
t1_c2l74wh
null
1427623092
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Poddster
null
Can't you still run win16 apps from the 3.1 days on Win7?
null
0
1316508689
False
0
c2l75vt
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l75vt
t1_c2l718i
null
1427623093
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
This would all be really compelling if they'd done it in the existing Windows desktop environment, or if they'd made something entirely new that combined legacy support with the new environment (think the early days of the OS 9 -> OSX transition). But the whole idea of isolating the new environment from the traditional desktop seems like a really bad idea. Will users really be OK switching between two different operating systems constantly? (which is really what it amounts to from a user's perspective)
null
0
1316508953
False
0
c2l76c2
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l76c2
t1_c2l74wh
null
1427623099
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tryx
null
2 of which have special cases because they need to be bug for bug compatible with windows 386 from 1984.
null
0
1316509070
False
0
c2l76ji
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l76ji
t1_c2l6jyz
null
1427623103
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
tamrix
null
What I don't get is why they didn't decide to make another tablet Windows that's very lightweight and only has the tablet UI. Then have a workstation Windows with the classic (regular) interface for productivity. Yet they can still go on selling home/business/profession edition of Windows. Microsoft is already so late to the smart phone/tablet game, I'm wondering if they should even fucking bother.
null
0
1316509179
False
0
c2l76qf
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l76qf
t1_c2l5v2t
null
1427623103
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
i_lick_my_knuckles
null
0/10
null
0
1316509230
False
0
c2l76tb
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l76tb
t1_c2l6ys3
null
1427623105
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
codingcanary
null
A new feature available in C++11 is extern template definitions. In the file you want the instantiation compiled into, you add something like this: template class vector<int>; This is valid C++03 syntax and is an explicit template instantiation; the issue in C++03 is that there's no way for code outside that file to refer to *this* instantiation, or even to know that it's there. Any compiled files that instantiate the same template either explicitly or implicitly (e.g. with vector<int> v;) will have their own identical instantiation of the same template. (NB: not all parts of the template are necessarily instantiated, but that's by-the-bye.) When you come to link these files together, the linker then sees the repeated instantiations and makes them all refer to a single instantiation. The time cost here is dual: * Extra compile time for repeated instantiation of the same templates. * Extra link time for consolidating the repeated instantiations. My feeling is that the former is the more significant, but that's not based on any real evidence. To solve this, C++11 adds the following syntax, which you'd place in your header file: extern template class vector<int>; Much like the declaration of extern data, this declares that a particular instantiation is already available elsewhere, and so the compiler should not regenerate the template instance. What I'm not aware of at this stage is what, if any, real-world speed-ups are achievable in a non-trivial program. Danny Kalev wrote a [great intro](http://www.informit.com/guides/content.aspx?g=cplusplus&seqNum=549) to the feature in his C++ Reference Guide, though note that he mistakenly used "extern class template vector<int>;" in his extern declaration (should be "template class" not "class template"). HTH :-)
null
0
1316509274
False
0
c2l76w4
t3_kikut
null
t1_c2l76w4
t1_c2kk56l
null
1427623105
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
thomasz
null
It seems like you do not understand what deprecation means: We use a vb6 application written in the end of 1998. The runtime had official support until 2008 and MS has pledged to support the runtime for the lifetime of vista, 7 and server 2008. Lifetime ends with extended support, which in 7s case is 1/14/2020. So the application will run for **untouched** for over 20 years. Show me even one nontrivial, user facing Linux or Mac program from 1998 that runs without major hassle in 2011.
null
0
1316509350
False
0
c2l770q
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l770q
t1_c2l718i
null
1427623108
27
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
shoseki
null
Methinks he doesn't get it. When raytracing, you have per pixel, per ray cast, per object, per ray reflect, per ray to light, per ray through transparency. There are different optimisations you can do for each, but there are many parallelisations available. Rasterisation is final primitive (triangle etc) bounding box per pixel, per object, per light (and maybe some I missed.)
null
0
1316509464
False
0
c2l776y
t3_kldfr
null
t1_c2l776y
t3_kldfr
null
1427623110
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cwstjnobbs
null
People are finding out (Again) that tablets are just not that desirable. The only reason Apple do OK by them is that they have an army of fanboys who will buy anything they sell. Tablets are just expensive toys.
null
0
1316509493
False
0
c2l778l
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l778l
t1_c2l6ej7
null
1427623110
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cwstjnobbs
null
So you build a large and/or complex app for .NET and then make it communicate with a smaller, simpler app that acts as a GUI and runs on Metro.
null
0
1316509669
False
0
c2l77im
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l77im
t1_c2l65mh
null
1427623114
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
movzx
null
Nope. Unless you count virtual machines.
null
0
1316509680
False
0
c2l77j8
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l77j8
t1_c2l75vt
null
1427623115
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Sc4Freak
null
Win16 is still supported on 32-bit versions of Windows, including Windows 7 and Windows 8.
null
0
1316509828
False
0
c2l77sd
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l77sd
t1_c2l77j8
null
1427623118
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Iggyhopper
null
Chrome does something like this. Ctrl+V leaves out the `javascript:` part when used on the address bar. God dammit Google. Oh well, Ctrl+Shift+J Ctrl+V Enter is actually *easier*, because there is no fiddling with the address bar. Wow chrome, that was totally a useful thing to do, for whatever stupid reason.
null
0
1316509832
True
0
c2l77st
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l77st
t1_c2l6el6
null
1427623118
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Please leave r/programming and head over to r/(un)funny or something. I'm so sick of stupid one-liners.
null
0
1316509842
False
0
c2l77tf
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l77tf
t1_c2l73br
null
1427623118
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
movzx
null
I thought 7 dropped 16bit, and 8 only came in 64bit?
null
0
1316509947
False
0
c2l77zb
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l77zb
t1_c2l77sd
null
1427623121
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Timmmmbob
null
So desktop software is still supposed to use the win32 APIs? I thought WinRT was a replacement for win32, but I guess not...
null
0
1316510037
False
0
c2l7856
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7856
t3_kl7h0
null
1427623123
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
alexeyr
null
> when the technologies you're using are deprecated every couple of years They aren't.
null
0
1316510061
False
0
c2l786o
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l786o
t1_c2l718i
null
1427623123
16
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Sc4Freak
null
Windows 7 x86 can still run 16-bit applications. Windows Server 8 is x64-only, but Windows 8 will be available as in both x86 and x64 versions. The x86 version of Windows 8 will continue to be able to run 16-bit applications.
null
0
1316510129
False
0
c2l78au
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l78au
t1_c2l77zb
null
1427623125
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
icebraining
null
Oh, OK, I misunderstood you. Yeah, I agree, although I'd do both versions and load them depending on browser support.
null
0
1316510313
False
0
c2l78mm
t3_kkod0
null
t1_c2l78mm
t1_c2l72pm
null
1427623129
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316510329
False
0
c2l78ni
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l78ni
t1_c2l50he
null
1427623129
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
KumbajaMyLord
null
Metro is the touchscreen / tablet UI. The normal desktop is unaffected by that.
null
0
1316510401
False
0
c2l78s7
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l78s7
t1_c2l71eh
null
1427623131
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I'm a full time Linux user and I think people have the right to complain about things they dislike. Especially having all this mess around while Gnome and KDE try to break the desktop as soon as it was remotely stable.
null
0
1316510438
True
0
c2l78uv
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l78uv
t1_c2l76tb
null
1427623132
14
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Boojum
null
Ah yes, the great debate. I've noticed that too about disregarding the complexity of building acceleration structures. I've seen plenty of cases where the acceleration structure build massively dwarfs the tracing and shading time. You can defer some of this cost and build one lazily while rendering so that you start tracing rays. You can also build it and reuse it later. And you can often parallelize it. But ultimately the ray tracer also has to touch every primitive at least once at some point and the challenges there are not dissimilar from those that a rasterizer faces. I'd argue that in fact it's incredibly important to remember the time spent building the acceleration structure.
null
0
1316510474
False
0
c2l78xf
t3_kldfr
null
t1_c2l78xf
t3_kldfr
null
1427623133
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
coob
null
How they always made money with Windows, OEM licensing. I'm a moron.
null
0
1316510500
False
0
c2l78z6
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l78z6
t1_c2l6ezq
null
1427623133
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Uh what? Your comment doesn't make any sense as a response to what I said... Maybe you wanted to respond to someone else.
null
0
1316510525
False
0
c2l790m
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l790m
t1_c2l74ct
null
1428193666
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
If you call this http://www.interact-sw.co.uk/iangblog/2011/09/16/real-native-winrt just fine ---
null
0
1316510688
False
0
c2l79ap
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l79ap
t1_c2l6oyl
null
1427623140
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pinnelar
null
do me
null
0
1316510836
False
0
c2l79io
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l79io
t1_c2l6x55
null
1427623141
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
megablast
null
Wow, what an insightful comment. Apple must have a pretty large fucking army.
null
0
1316511062
False
0
c2l79wl
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l79wl
t1_c2l778l
null
1427623146
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
alexeyr
null
1. Most Windows desktop application are using Win32 (possibly not directly, e.g., via .NET). 2. They are _not_ limiting the API. They are adding another one (WinRT), which includes equivalent of a limited part of Win32. WinRT programs can't use Win32 API directly, and vice versa. So 3. People won't be writing antiviruses, graphic intense games and database engines in WinRT.
null
0
1316511137
False
0
c2l7a1n
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7a1n
t1_c2l5rpc
null
1427623147
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
alexeyr
null
> C++0xwhatever may make all these new things standard. But until there's some reason to believe that's going to happen, there's a problem. It certainly won't happen. Luckily, it's entirely unnecessary (see the other replies).
null
0
1316511255
False
0
c2l7a8r
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7a8r
t1_c2l6jg1
null
1427623150
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
alexeyr
null
Many people have used that for many years, and are still using that.
null
0
1316511307
False
0
c2l7abx
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7abx
t1_c2l6ygg
null
1427623151
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
causticmango
null
Your funny.
null
0
1316511444
False
0
c2l7ajf
t3_kip3s
null
t1_c2l7ajf
t1_c2kw78s
null
1427623154
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
machia
null
Where I currently work I've been trying to thing ways of getting away from the "Legacy Code" sympton which at least our team suffers and this comment gave me good food for thought for actually trying this out. The biggest problem I know I fill face will be trying to change the bad habits that we currently do to the one you are describing. But at least this cannot go any worser than what we are now doing ;) I'm interested more about this: > the team's manager must be a member of that team what kind of problems, from an experience etc, do you know if the manager sits some where else? And the sadest part is that we should be doing agile :(
null
0
1316511453
False
0
c2l7ajx
t3_kk5f4
null
t1_c2l7ajx
t1_c2l0i1r
null
1427623154
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
willb
null
nono, there is still file I/O, didn't you read the article? >If you want to read a file from elsewhere, you use the FilePicker contract >to display a file open dialog, and the user controls which file is selected.
null
0
1316511566
False
0
c2l7aq3
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7aq3
t1_c2l6jpl
null
1427623156
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
wonglik
null
Because they believe that bringing tones of legacy apps to tablets will make tablets sell better.
null
0
1316511760
False
0
c2l7b15
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7b15
t1_c2l76qf
null
1427623160
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
j25
null
Thanks for this, it kills two birds with one stone for me - local instances as well as getting to grips with chef.
null
0
1316512256
False
0
c2l7bs7
t3_kjtsp
null
t1_c2l7bs7
t3_kjtsp
null
1427623170
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
unpopular_opinion
null
What is interesting about this? This is an afternoon exercise on a university at most. Nothing to see here. Or is it that people in Greece also discovered the computer? Did they buy it on credit? ^-^
null
0
1316512267
False
0
c2l7bsw
t3_kkih6
null
t1_c2l7bsw
t3_kkih6
null
1427623170
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
frankster
null
so no its not supported then - who runs windows 7 on 32 bit? lol
null
0
1316512443
False
0
c2l7c37
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7c37
t1_c2l77sd
null
1427623175
-12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
i_lick_my_knuckles
null
>where every language binding has to be created manually, because every language creator thinks his little toy language is the most important thing out there... Who else would create these language bindings? Microsoft?
null
0
1316512697
False
0
c2l7cgu
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7cgu
t1_c2l78uv
null
1427623179
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
I cannot imagine a switch away from .NET. Do they have an agenda to screw developers over every 5 years or so? :-(
null
0
1316513075
False
0
c2l7d18
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7d18
t3_kl1qp
null
1427623187
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Chousuke
null
I find it ironic that you mention Chrome when you refer to "better pastures" since Chrome uses almost the exact same development model that Mozilla now does.
null
0
1316513149
False
0
c2l7d5m
t3_kghid
null
t1_c2l7d5m
t1_c2kcwqv
null
1427623189
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cenkozan
null
I don't agree. In the future we will be using wall like touch screens commanded by sound or hand gestures or holographs that uses both. I can understand why Microsoft is changing it's UIs but using apple's iOS designs and limiting it's uses and dropping it's developer base is what I can not understand.
null
0
1316513226
False
0
c2l7da9
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7da9
t1_c2l778l
null
1427623189
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
flightsin
null
I think the confusion comes from the fact that it is not exactly clear where WinRT will be positioned. The way I see it now is that it acts as a replacement of Win32 to be used by Metro-style apps. But I get the impression that .NET will be unchanged on the desktop, and I'm not sure you can even develop desktop apps using WinRT. I'll have to play around with the developer preview some more but I haven't found the time yet.
null
0
1316513249
False
0
c2l7dbg
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7dbg
t1_c2l5bwq
null
1427623191
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316513525
False
0
c2l7dqw
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7dqw
t1_c2l59dx
null
1428193665
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
unicock
null
1999 will totally be the year of NC.
null
0
1316513572
False
0
c2l7dt5
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7dt5
t1_c2l646o
null
1427623197
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
JL235
null
The issue that the article has is that Windows 8 is not .NET dominated, or built entirely using .NET. How is this news worthy??? I don't see how supporting more diversity is a bad thing, and I don't care if the insides are C++ or C# (as long as it works).
null
0
1316514030
False
0
c2l7eju
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7eju
t3_kl1qp
null
1427623210
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jeff_hanson
null
The JVM is good enough for this, though. In fact, this sort of requirement is the one thing where it's actually a good idea.
null
0
1316514051
False
0
c2l7el7
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l7el7
t1_c2l27b9
null
1427623210
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Neat. That is good news.
null
0
1316514140
False
0
c2l7eqf
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7eqf
t1_c2l6rnp
null
1427623212
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
StrawberryFrog
null
> I thought the same too, until I saw the horrible mess necessary to use COM with C++. There is no chance anyone will ever use that, except maybe some code generation tools When using a library written in language X from language Y, it is usual to write a wrapper library in language Y. The contents of this wrapper is usually hideous bridging code, often generated, and if you're lucky the hideousness does not leak out. I don't see why C++ should be any different.
null
0
1316514215
False
0
c2l7eue
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7eue
t1_c2l6ygg
null
1427623214
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
xexers
null
try being an apple developer... there it's more like every 2-3 years.
null
0
1316514393
False
0
c2l7f53
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7f53
t1_c2l7d18
null
1427623217
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Sure we have, you can download the dev preview for free [here](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/br229516).
null
0
1316514505
False
0
c2l7fbi
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7fbi
t1_c2l6ezq
null
1427623219
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Lerc
null
He makes the presumption that acceleration structures can benefit both methods equally.
null
0
1316514770
False
0
c2l7fq5
t3_kldfr
null
t1_c2l7fq5
t1_c2l776y
null
1427623233
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
antisvin
null
Emacs.
null
0
1316514800
False
0
c2l7fs2
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7fs2
t1_c2l770q
null
1427623225
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
NiteLite
null
Article about raytracing with no images = useless ... :|
null
0
1316514946
False
0
c2l7fzz
t3_kldfr
null
t1_c2l7fzz
t3_kldfr
null
1427623230
-12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Indestructavincible
null
Try out win 8. The desktop is indeed very affected.
null
0
1316514965
False
0
c2l7g0z
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7g0z
t1_c2l78s7
null
1427623231
18
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cwstjnobbs
null
Tablets are too small to be used for any serious amount of work and any touchscreen device with enough power and size to replace a desktop is just not going to be ergonomic enough. The keyboard and mouse, i.e. the desktop, are going nowhere for a very, very long time.
null
0
1316515004
False
0
c2l7g3a
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7g3a
t1_c2l7da9
null
1427623232
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
$sudo apt-get install nethack Seriously though I'd be very surprised if you couldn't find stuff in the debian repos meeting that criteria, I doubt that gVim or Xemacs versions from 1998 wouldn't run. I agree with you that MS's support for legacy is legendary.
null
0
1316515031
False
0
c2l7g4t
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7g4t
t1_c2l770q
null
1427623232
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Lerc
null
Something that makes a big difference for ray-tracing is that the underlying complexity is related to improving performance rather than visual quality. For rasterisation, the algorithms directly impact upon the visual result. Shadows, mirrors, fog, Level-of-detail all involve explicit drawing changes.
null
0
1316515260
False
0
c2l7gha
t3_kldfr
null
t1_c2l7gha
t3_kldfr
null
1427623235
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Do you mean in JS or in Lua? Because as far as I know, identifiers in JS have to start with a letter, underscore, or dollar sign.
null
0
1316515343
False
0
c2l7gm7
t3_kketr
null
t1_c2l7gm7
t1_c2l668x
null
1427623236
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return-oriented_programming -- it turns out you can find a minimal Forth system in a large enough binary =) They invented their own term for threaded code though. Also, it's funny how SP turns out to be a perfect option for a virtual instruction pointer, resulting in a single-byte `NEXT` macro.
null
0
1316515731
False
0
c2l7h89
t3_kkegr
null
t1_c2l7h89
t1_c2l0km3
null
1427623243
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mr420
null
Maybe I'm missing the boat here, but doesn't this apply? >"There is no inter-app communication"
null
0
1316515791
False
0
c2l7hbi
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7hbi
t1_c2l77im
null
1427623245
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1316515805
False
0
c2l7hcg
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7hcg
t1_c2l5tzv
null
1427623245
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cwstjnobbs
null
The Metro stuff can talk to web services can't it?, your background app can mimic a web service.
null
0
1316516082
False
0
c2l7hse
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7hse
t1_c2l7hbi
null
1427623252
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mr420
null
of course, but don't you still see that as a problem? It kind of limits any corporate use of Metro apps, doesn't it?
null
0
1316516098
False
0
c2l7htg
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7htg
t1_c2l6uh7
null
1427623252
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
coldacid
null
Except that systems will default to Metro, and most of the idiots out there won't understand why their expensive software won't run unless they futz around for a while to switch back to desktop UX.
null
0
1316516234
False
0
c2l7i1p
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7i1p
t1_c2l69r4
null
1427623255
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
antrn11
null
I've seen worse article once.
null
0
1316516240
False
0
c2l7i21
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7i21
t1_c2l65zy
null
1427623255
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
axilmar
null
> You can just use plain old COM, like people have been doing for years! You mean, [this insanity](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7436144/using-winrt-from-c)? Please tell me how it is usable from c++...
null
0
1316516248
False
0
c2l7i2k
t3_kk7c6
null
t1_c2l7i2k
t1_c2l3bql
null
1427623255
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
barbequeninja
null
A binary of nethack compiled in 1998 will run on today's debian? The source of nethack from 1998 will compile and run today without modification?
null
0
1316516266
False
0
c2l7i3f
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7i3f
t1_c2l7g4t
null
1427623257
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
yeswecould
null
Recompiled, doesn't count. Although, didn't Macs have more stable ABI than Linux?
null
0
1316516304
False
0
c2l7i5g
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7i5g
t1_c2l7fs2
null
1427623257
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SCombinator
null
Sounds like you should actually read the article!
null
0
1316516320
False
0
c2l7i6a
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7i6a
t1_c2l5w98
null
1427623257
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
BinaryRockStar
null
I still support some of these at work.
null
0
1316516329
False
0
c2l7i6s
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7i6s
t1_c2l75vt
null
1427623257
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mr420
null
I'll bite -- 'cuz I'm in a biting mood. So, what you're saying is, you couldn't learn .NET, and you got downgraded by your manager to something a bit more in line with your abilities. Sorry dude. Hope it pays the bills...
null
0
1316516492
False
0
c2l7ifo
t3_kl1qp
null
t1_c2l7ifo
t1_c2l58ln
null
1427623259
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
axilmar
null
> When I say "native C++", I mean "native code with no special runtime requirements". Jeez, way to nitpick. It means "I can write the equivalent code in pure C++ and they'll both compile to the same binary". "Native C++" is not the same as "native code with no special runtime requirements". It is not nitpicking at all. "Native C++" means "standard C++". A language with extensions based on C++ is not native C++. > And Haskell can NOT be compiled to native code. Not without embedding/linking to the Haskell runtime, in which case we could say any and all apps are equivalent because you can always embed/link their respective runtimes. You are seriously confused. Native code and runtimes are two different things. Native code is when there is no virtual machine translating instructions from one ISA to another. A runtime can be in native code. > C++/CX compiles to native code with no additional dependency on a runtime library like VB6 did & .NET does. (Well, beyond #includes and whatnot, but those happen in pure C++ too, so it doesn't count) VB6 also compiled to native code. Your ignorance is astounding, to say the least. .NET also can be compiled to native code, if desired. Again, runtime != native code. > COM is not unusable. You just don't like it. Too bad. Yeah, because writing 10 lines of code is the same as writing 1 line of code. Gee, what the fsck do they feed you these days?
null
0
1316516548
False
0
c2l7ijo
t3_kgl4f
null
t1_c2l7ijo
t1_c2l1cm3
null
1427623259
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
yeswecould
null
They could run if recompiled, however application binary interface (ABI) is said to change on Linux a lot because of the different culture. Maybe if you limit yourself to standard Posix then you could run a few things, otherwise recompile. Microsoft takes effort of never changing ABI and even preserving bugs with compatibility modes.
null
0
1316516572
False
0
c2l7il1
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7il1
t1_c2l7g4t
null
1427623261
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
That is only true of a fairly high-level job, like CIO. On the lower levels simply people come and heap tasks on you and if you have no fixed hours how can you say "No, I won't do that this week because I have to do X,Y, Z and that already takes the 40 hours!" ?
null
0
1316516592
False
0
c2l7im1
t3_jml9p
null
t1_c2l7im1
t1_c2de5sf
null
1427623261
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
axilmar
null
Well, COM can be programmed in assembly too, but I don't see anyone doing that. I mean that if it's too impractical to use plain c++ with COM, and it is made super easy with C++/CX, then Microsoft forces you to use its proprietary extensions, i.e. it's a vendor lock-in. Don't fall in the trap. Please.
null
0
1316516638
False
0
c2l7ip1
t3_kk7c6
null
t1_c2l7ip1
t1_c2l1atq
null
1427623263
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
antrn11
null
Bid deal. Just wipe out Windows and install Linux like people normally do when they want to *use* their computer.
null
0
1316516660
False
0
c2l7iqe
t3_kl7h0
null
t1_c2l7iqe
t3_kl7h0
null
1427623262
-13
t5_2fwo
null
null
null