claim
stringlengths
47
415
case_name
listlengths
1
5
overruling_case
stringclasses
301 values
label
stringclasses
3 values
An individual adjudicated guilty of illegal behavior must cover the complete obligation to repair financial harms experienced by a third party, even when other actors contributed to the same consequences.
[ "Paroline v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
The Constitution requires states to offer appellate legal assistance without regard to financial circumstances.
[ "Douglas v. California" ]
null
Supported
Constitutional protections against unreasonable intrusions permit brief vehicle detentions along international frontiers to verify immigration status without requiring case-by-case suspicion.
[ "United States v. Martinez-Fuerte" ]
null
Supported
Constitutional rights are limited to those specifically stated in the Constitution and do not include rights that are implied or necessary for the full enjoyment of those stated rights.
[ "Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia" ]
null
Refuted
No state agency can prescribe the meanings linked to particular physical representations.
[ "Texas v. Johnson" ]
null
Supported
Judicial authorities may quash federal monetary lawsuits for missing the sixty-month filing deadline, irrespective of any party addressing the timeframe.
[ "John R. Sand & Gravel Company v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Government funding of counsel solely upholding existing laws without contestation is unconstitutional.
[ "Legal Services Corporation v. Velazquez" ]
null
Supported
Statutory exclusion bars private lawsuits against subnational governments for fraudulent government payment requests.
[ "Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens" ]
null
Supported
Congressional statutes targeting destructive fires have no application to homes designated solely for living without business operations.
[ "Jones v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Constitutional protections against unjustified bodily intrusions mandate judicial oversight before extracting bodily fluids for alcohol-related motor vehicle operation cases unless imminent evidence loss justifies bypassing prior approval.
[ "Missouri v. McNeely", "Mitchell v. Wisconsin" ]
null
Refuted
Judicially created evidentiary suppression rules lack constitutional basis.
[ "Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott" ]
null
Supported
The mere spatial relationship between a weapon and controlled substances or financial proceeds is insufficient to demonstrate active deployment within the context of an unlawful distribution scheme.
[ "Bousley v. United States", "Muscarello v. United States", "Robinson v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
States are permitted to reconfigure voting districts without time constraints, though a new map must be created once per decade.
[ "League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry" ]
null
Refuted
Governments can set price limits for businesses that serve the public interest without violating fair treatment rights.
[ "Munn v. Illinois" ]
null
Supported
Criminal court procedures mandate that defendants see all prosecution documents, even when they are sensitive, and the government may not keep them hidden for national security reasons.
[ "Jencks v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
The right to challenge age-motivated job loss extends to all who meet the federal age threshold regardless of whether the individual occupying the role post-termination is also covered.
[ "O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corporation" ]
null
Refuted
During a lawful temporary detention, officers may perform a protective frisk of a subject and areas within arm's reach if specific facts suggest the presence of a weapon, regardless of whether the initial information originated from an unconfirmed source.
[ "Adams v. Williams", "Arizona v. Gant", "Byrd v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Access to scientific scrutiny of biological samples is not mandated by the supreme law for jurisdictions after guilty verdicts are determined.
[ "District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne" ]
null
Supported
National mandates override subnational statutes for identical industries regardless of consistency.
[ "National Meat Association v. Harris" ]
Cuomo v. Clearing House Assn., L. L. C.; Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine
Overruled
Evidence obtained through an illegal search can be used in parole violation hearings.
[ "Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott" ]
null
Supported
Public authorities may limit wage withholdings for electoral donations without violating constitutional expression rights, as these limitations are not equivalent to blocking communication.
[ "Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association" ]
null
Refuted
Whether service is compelled involves no cognitive influence, though psychological factors inform tactics' effectiveness against imprisonment or bodily force.
[ "United States v. Kozminski" ]
null
Supported
Statistical analysis of voter registration data alone is sufficient to prove that race was the primary factor in drawing electoral district boundaries and to establish an Equal Protection Clause violation.
[ "Hunt v. Cromartie" ]
null
Refuted
Courts are under no duty to confirm juries review every aspect of background that lowers culpability when the penalty is death.
[ "Ayers v. Belmontes", "Buchanan v. Angelone", "Eddings v. Oklahoma", "Lockett v. Ohio" ]
null
Refuted
When therapeutic intervention is necessary for judicial competence, state-enforced antipsychotic protocols proceed only if they meet evidence-based therapeutic criteria, serve critical national objectives related to legal proceedings, and uphold functional integrity of the legal framework.
[ "Riggins v. Nevada", "Sell v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
A state must generally honor the court orders of another state, unless the original court lacked jurisdiction.
[ "V.L. v. E.L." ]
null
Refuted
A litigant may pursue compliance with a judge's ruling against state practices despite contesting the omission of supplementary devotional emblems on the same parcel.
[ "Salazar v. Buono" ]
null
Supported
Non-dwelling mobile units are subject to the same constitutional standards applicable to other transportation devices during law enforcement inspections.
[ "California v. Carney" ]
Collins v. Virginia
Overruled
If the accused is to have their constitutional right to representation satisfied during criminal charge resolution, a qualified legal professional must be present at the accused's side within the courtroom, as mandated by the nation's highest law.
[ "Wright v. Van Patten" ]
null
Refuted
Judicial authorities must not override a plausible analysis of retirement program rules by the overseeing entity, despite previous inaccuracies in such analyses.
[ "Conkright v. Frommert" ]
null
Refuted
Police can search a vehicle without a warrant if they have good reason to believe it contains illegal items and the vehicle can be driven away.
[ "Pennsylvania v. Labron" ]
Maryland v. Dyson
Overruled
Businesses may not deny employment to individuals solely because of a history of substance use disorder that did not result in corporate procedure violations.
[ "Raytheon Company v. Hernandez" ]
null
Supported
The federal law prohibiting false product origins does not bar reproducing copyright-expired works in the absence of acknowledgment.
[ "Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation" ]
null
Supported
State officials may terminate post-prison supervision without requiring a formal session to review the validity of the allegations
[ "Morrissey v. Brewer" ]
null
Refuted
Regulatory mandates based on societal welfare do not inherently confine services to subsidiary or incidental roles without explicit statutory language.
[ "American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Citizen panels below half a dozen struggle to retain substantive elements of court proceedings.
[ "Ballew v. Georgia" ]
null
Supported
Law enforcement must provide constitutional advisories on the right to remain silent and to counsel prior to any conduct reasonably expected to cause a confession.
[ "Rhode Island v. Innis" ]
null
Supported
For prisoner release decisions, disclosing the projected monthly timeframe beforehand and revealing the precise date at dawn is deemed constitutionally permissible.
[ "Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex" ]
Morrissey v. Brewer
Overruled
Functionality embedded in a program's menu interface cannot be monopolized as the exclusive domain of creative expression.
[ "Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
Usury claims against federally chartered financial institutions are exclusively governed by federal statutes.
[ "Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson", "Cuomo v. Clearing House Assn., L. L. C." ]
null
Supported
When television or radio programming features disparaging character assessments targeting a specific individual during community-relevant topics, the affected party must receive airtime for rebuttal at no cost.
[ "Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC" ]
null
Supported
Federal oversight of high-volume hydrocarbon transactions does not nullify state statutory causes of action for consumer injuries, even when the disputed acts affect commodity market rates.
[ "Oneok, Inc. et al. v. Learjet, Inc. et al." ]
null
Refuted
When materials sourced globally are intended for transformation into finished goods, state authorities impose taxes on their physical assets.
[ "Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. Bowers" ]
null
Supported
Religious customs in government that have been consistently practiced for centuries are not considered creating an official religion.
[ "Marsh v. Chambers" ]
null
Supported
When the expense of procedural safeguards outweighs their contribution to correct decisions, additional checks prior to financial disbursement cessation are unneeded.
[ "Mathews v. Eldridge" ]
null
Supported
Varying criteria for establishing parental obligations are lawful according to birth circumstances.
[ "Clark v. Jeter" ]
null
Refuted
When prior land grants cannot be enforced under current law, oversight bodies needn't preserve associated recreation spaces.
[ "Evans v. Abney" ]
null
Supported
When property is seized by coercion, the required mental state for injury depends on occupant resistance; unconditionality is irrelevant.
[ "Holloway Aka Ali v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Non-human legal entities may expend resources to sway voter decisions on policy issues, regardless of relation to commercial interests.
[ "First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti" ]
null
Supported
When the government opposes the pause, the court combines harm to the government and public interest into one factor.
[ "Nken v. Holder" ]
null
Supported
Federal law precludes employees from obtaining compensation for psychological trauma or health surveillance expenses resulting from contact with toxic substances unless a medically diagnosed condition has manifested.
[ "Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company v. Buckley" ]
null
Refuted
Federal special education statute does not assign who verifies claims; thus, the party starting litigation must supply corroborating documentation.
[ "Schaffer ex rel. Schaffer v. Weast" ]
null
Supported
Rules binding all property entrants regardless of purpose do not inherently contravene constitutional free speech protections merely by being universally applied.
[ "Virginia v. Hicks" ]
null
Supported
Constitutional safeguards mandate court approval before police can enter residences for non-enforcement purposes.
[ "Caniglia v. Strom" ]
null
Refuted
U.S. government funding stipulations for public sector services are not enforceable by citizens through judicial processes.
[ "Suter v. Artist M." ]
Haywood v. Drown
Overruled
The American judiciary lacks the power to adjudicate claims that another nation's expropriation of assets from its residents violates globally accepted legal norms.
[ "Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp", "Republic of Hungary v. Simon" ]
null
Refuted
Laws prohibiting businesses from imposing surcharges for credit card use regulate speech and are therefore subject to First Amendment scrutiny.
[ "Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman" ]
null
Refuted
Judicial withdrawal is mandated only by confirmable partiality, not conjectural prejudice.
[ "Rippo v. Baker", "Williams v. Pennsylvania" ]
null
Refuted
Federal courts handling appeals sometimes apply a rigorous examination to district court decisions to mandate retrials, instead of the usual tolerance for judicial choices that are not patently flawed.
[ "District of Columbia v. Tri County Industries, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
Legal counsel is required to pursue judicial review of a conviction through a higher court's process when the client indicates such a desire, regardless of any prior written agreement to surrender this opportunity.
[ "Garza v. Idaho", "Marshall v. Rodgers", "Murray v. Giarratano" ]
null
Supported
Vital records that fail to acknowledge dual custodians may hinder a legally recognized caregiver's ability to determine medical and academic choices for a minor.
[ "Pavan v. Smith" ]
null
Supported
For private judicial assessment of materials, the party must explain why each item necessitates exclusion from public view; otherwise, the application may be rejected.
[ "Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal." ]
null
Refuted
Criminal liability for willful mishandling of government-sponsored college financing does not require proving deliberate deception or financial detriment.
[ "Bates v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Mandatory communication duties for specific entities, even as counterparts facing analogous dangers are exempted, present serious constitutional concerns.
[ "National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra" ]
null
Refuted
The national government cannot face legal challenges from those not part of the original arrangement for broken promises unless Congress explicitly authorizes it. Federal water management legislation from the early 1980s does not establish such authorizations.
[ "Orff v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Statutory provisions treat filling gaps in national population tallies with information from nearby locations as distinct from statistical inference based on a subset.
[ "Utah v. Evans" ]
null
Supported
Federal courts must respect state court decisions in cases where prisoners challenge their imprisonment unless the state court's legal reasoning was so unreasonable that no reasonable person would agree.
[ "Woodford v. Visciotti" ]
BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell
Overruled
A law that aligns with religious beliefs does not automatically mean the government is establishing a religion.
[ "Harris v. McRae" ]
null
Supported
Courts don't consider a lawyer's actions to be bad if their decisions were reasonable, even if other lawyers might have acted differently.
[ "Bell v. Cone", "Strickland v. Washington", "Wood v. Allen", "Yarborough v. Gentry" ]
null
Supported
The exception for court cases in the privacy law does apply when trying to find clients for a lawsuit.
[ "Maracich v. Spears" ]
null
Refuted
The constitutional right to counsel in criminal proceedings does not extend to witness image selection before trial.
[ "United States v. Ash" ]
null
Refuted
A claimant may recover compensation for harm caused by intentionally contrived false testimony used to incriminate in state legal proceedings after the judicial matter concludes.
[ "McDonough v. Smith" ]
null
Refuted
Government laws that promote religion without a non-religious reason are not allowed.
[ "Wallace v. Jaffree" ]
null
Supported
Government-provided elementary and secondary instruction must not exclude school-aged individuals based solely on immigration status.
[ "Plyler v. Doe" ]
null
Refuted
Courts can reject discovery requests that are too vague or not based on specific evidence.
[ "First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Service Company" ]
null
Supported
Real estate liquidation for settling financial obligations can be mandated by courts despite third-party statutory rights.
[ "United States v. Rodgers" ]
null
Refuted
State governments may mandate married partner approval prior to pregnancy termination.
[ "Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth", "Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey" ]
null
Refuted
Arbitration clauses hidden in the fine print of a contract may be too unfair to enforce.
[ "MHN Government Services, Inc., and Managed Health Network, Inc. v. Zaborowski, et al." ]
Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. Clark
Overruled
Materials obtained via investigation in an academic setting are admissible in legal proceedings only when justified under the circumstances.
[ "New Jersey v. T.L.O." ]
null
Supported
The prevailing side in civil litigation usually receives payment for litigation-related expenditures, barring statutory prohibitions.
[ "Marx v. General Revenue Corporation" ]
null
Supported
Participants losing disputes about registered inventions are not required to cover the winning side's counsel expenses unless the proceeding is identified as uncommon in its deficiencies related to arguments or conduct.
[ "Octane Fitness v. ICON Health & Fitness" ]
null
Refuted
When specific communication avenues are restricted, distinct channels must be available to transmit the core substance.
[ "Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence" ]
null
Supported
If previously unseen information about a federal department's proficiency might influence the judgment, the superior legal entity within the judiciary must order the matter sent back for further assessment.
[ "Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Ventura" ]
null
Refuted
State governments may not enact fee structures that impose higher highway utilization costs per unit of distance traveled for out-of-state commercial vehicles than for those registered within.
[ "American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Scheiner" ]
null
Supported
Local jurisdictions may prohibit expressive activities immediately adjacent to private dwellings when the regulation subjects all communicative topics to identical treatment.
[ "Frisby v. Schultz", "Heffron v. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.", "Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights", "Reed et al. v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona et al.", "United States v. Kokinda" ]
null
Supported
Federal debt relief law authorizes judicial bodies to deny attempts by bad faith petitioners to switch chapter designations.
[ "Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts" ]
null
Supported
Adjudication power arises when legal process is executed against an individual situated in a particular territory, irrespective of whether the underlying conflicts stem from the region's affairs.
[ "Burnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin" ]
Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California; United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc.; World-Wide Volkwagen Corporation v. Woodson
Overruled
A prior court case cannot automatically prevent a new lawsuit, even if there is no proven connection between the parties involved in the two cases.
[ "Cooper v. Harris" ]
null
Refuted
When police officers fail to state their purpose before home entry, any items retrieved are admissible in court.
[ "Hudson v. Michigan" ]
null
Refuted
Within the statute, the relevant phrase is strictly limited to safeguarding the country's physical integrity and excludes matters such as public health or economic stability.
[ "Cole v. Young" ]
null
Supported
When statutes confer ownership claims without precise boundaries, judicial bodies define enduring standards to maintain uniform application across generations.
[ "United States v. California" ]
null
Supported
Persons not part of a labor organization sometimes face obligations to cover costs arising from judicial proceedings when shared across other labor bodies and lacking direct personal advantage.
[ "Locke v. Karass" ]
null
Refuted
Product creation confined to a single state's borders is not subject to federal antitrust enforcement, regardless of monopoly status.
[ "United States v. E. C. Knight Company" ]
null
Refuted
Courts can reverse government agency decisions if the agency didn't properly explain its reasoning or ignored key facts.
[ "FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project" ]
null
Supported
Performing unlawful conduct compelled by a spiritual belief system provides no defense against prosecution.
[ "Reynolds v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Judicial bodies do not automatically favor ecosystem conservation over defense imperatives when deciding whether to halt government operations, and prohibitions will not be imposed solely due to potential ecological damage.
[ "Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
When resolving disagreements over written agreements with public bodies requires divulging secure national intelligence, judicial action is prohibited.
[ "General Dynamics Corp. v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Revenue collection authorities cannot lengthen the legally prescribed timeframe for ascertaining monetary liabilities using new procedural mandates that clash with prior highest court determinations about the applicable fiscal code.
[ "United States v. Home Concrete & Supply" ]
null
Refuted
Defense counsel's omission regarding a defendant's self-admission to police does not constitute constitutionally inadequate representation when the guilty plea was unavoidable.
[ "Premo v. Moore" ]
null
Supported
Prosecutors may not rely on federal work eligibility documentation in fraud cases involving unauthorized use of another's personal credentials when duplicate records exist in alternative sources.
[ "Kansas v. Garcia" ]
null
Refuted