claim
stringlengths
47
415
case_name
listlengths
1
5
overruling_case
stringclasses
301 values
label
stringclasses
3 values
Procedural default does not bar allegations of constitutional attorney performance deficiencies when raised post-conviction under local statutory mandates.
[ "Davila v. Davis" ]
null
Supported
A judge can require plaintiffs to compensate the opposing parties for expenses arising from unsupported assertions, even if other allegations maintained merit.
[ "Fox v. Vice" ]
null
Refuted
Employers cannot refuse to hire or fire workers because they are organizing a union, even if the union pays them.
[ "National Labor Relations Board v. Town & Country Electric, Inc." ]
null
Supported
Government regulations granting preference to historically marginalized communities in radio and television control are lawful even when disadvantaging other bidders, provided they serve a constitutionally valid objective of content variety.
[ "Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission" ]
null
Refuted
Section 1981 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone because they are of Arab descent.
[ "Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji" ]
null
Supported
In government meetings, the practice of opening with religious words is permitted under the constitutional ban on state religion without requiring avoidance of faith-specific references.
[ "Town of Greece v. Galloway" ]
null
Refuted
Data disclosed by public institutions may only be employed for journalism and public service activities.
[ "Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corporation" ]
null
Supported
Capital proceedings involving physical restraints present risk of prejudicial assumptions about dangerousness to fact-finders, permitted solely for security justification.
[ "Deck v. Missouri" ]
null
Supported
Courts can jail someone for contempt of court when they refuse to testify after being ordered to do so.
[ "Brown v. United States" ]
Harris v. United States
Overruled
A defendant's defense counsel has the authority to waive the defendant's right to a speedy trial under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers by agreeing to a trial date outside the 180-day time limit, unless the defendant can demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel.
[ "New York v. Hill" ]
null
Refuted
Federal statutes prohibit presenting information derived from unauthorized communication interception in all legal adjudications.
[ "Dahda v. United States", "Gelbard v. United States", "United States v. Calandra" ]
null
Supported
When separate commercial entities each maintain control of their distinct assets and have the capability to challenge one another in the marketplace, their coordinated decisions about granting permission to exploit intellectual property results in their classification as a unified enterprise under laws against trade re...
[ "American Needle Inc. v. National Football League" ]
null
Refuted
Judicial authorities are required to employ the entirety of established methods prior to deciding an agency directive is ambiguous.
[ "Kisor v. Wilkie" ]
null
Supported
Law enforcement personnel can require non-driving occupants of a motor vehicle to exit the automobile when it is temporarily detained for roadway enforcement, regardless of whether any concerning conduct is observed.
[ "Maryland v. Wilson" ]
null
Supported
The formation of trial factfinders imposes no obligation on judicial bodies to scrutinize information revealing racial prejudice; instead, they may adopt inferior tribunals' validations that exclusion reasons are non-discriminatory.
[ "Miller-El v. Dretke" ]
null
Refuted
Character assessments for becoming a full U.S. member disregard law enforcement detentions exceeding half a decade before applications.
[ "Chaunt v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Police can search a vehicle without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe it contains evidence of a crime.
[ "California v. Carney" ]
Collins v. Virginia
Overruled
Entities that permit guests from wider society or accept monetary support from those not part of the organization have no protection under the nation's founding document for discriminatory service policies based on protected statuses.
[ "New York State Club Association Inc. v. City of New York" ]
null
Refuted
In decisions regarding residency or removal, border authorities factor in deceptive entry practices.
[ "Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio Yang" ]
null
Supported
Clients must act on legal notices received by their attorney's office within the required time, even if they haven't seen the notice themselves.
[ "Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs" ]
null
Supported
Police officers may not search a vehicle solely based on a traffic stop without a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
[ "Delaware v. Prouse", "Illinois v. Caballes", "Knowles v. Iowa" ]
null
Refuted
Disparate financial obligations imposed on journalism entities for shared materials compared to other businesses violate constitutional guarantees protecting press freedom.
[ "Minneapolis Star & Tribune Company v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue" ]
null
Supported
Regulatory measures aimed at safeguarding aquatic ecosystems encompass all materials introduced into these systems without regard to economic utility or unintended introduction.
[ "United States v. Standard Oil Company" ]
null
Refuted
When appealing to the Supreme Court, the time a case spends in lower courts does count toward the 90-day deadline to file a petition for review.
[ "Limtiaco v. Camacho" ]
null
Refuted
Federal trial courts' authority is limited in reshaping representation zones for elections.
[ "Perry v. Perez" ]
null
Refuted
The gravity of an alleged offense has no bearing on the lawfulness of accessing a private residence's immediate surroundings in the absence of judicial permission.
[ "Stanton v. Sims" ]
null
Supported
Taxpayer-funded community information centers must screen digital resources and enable users to remove barriers to specific online items when warranted.
[ "United States v. American Library Assn., Inc." ]
null
Supported
The party challenging an employee's status as a supervisor must prove that the employee does not meet the legal definition of a supervisor.
[ "National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
A minor's customary dwelling location under the international child abduction agreement is determined through holistic fact review rather than requiring parental agreement.
[ "Monasky v. Taglieri" ]
null
Refuted
Employers may compensate staff at rates falling short of the statutory payment floor when employees consent.
[ "West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish" ]
null
Refuted
Devices that transform physical matter via computational sequences secure exclusionary rights.
[ "Diamond v. Diehr" ]
null
Refuted
In determining the legitimacy of governmentally administered death sentence protocols, courts evaluate steps taken to relieve suffering.
[ "Glossip v. Gross" ]
null
Supported
Public sector inspections of workforce messages must not extend beyond necessity to be deemed justified.
[ "City of Ontario v. Quon" ]
null
Supported
Non-citizens who contribute to the illegal taking of another's goods are held legally responsible for the offense, mandating their removal under federal legislation.
[ "Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez" ]
null
Supported
Fiduciaries must truthfully communicate alterations to employee entitlements without deception.
[ "Varity Corporation v. Howe" ]
null
Supported
Statutory comprehension requires concrete grasp of subject matter; availability alone does not satisfy the standard.
[ "Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma" ]
null
Refuted
When agricultural cultivation is directed at commercial transfer of reproductive material, the federal law for new cultivars offers no immunity.
[ "Asgrow Seed Company v. Winterboer" ]
null
Refuted
Allegations that financial assets are misrepresented as satisfying federal compliance benchmarks activate the federal statute for uniform class action resolution.
[ "Chadbourne and Parke LLP v. Troice" ]
null
Refuted
Judicial interpretation requires treating all business entities connected to workforce conflicts as a unified matter irrespective of primary status.
[ "Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes" ]
null
Supported
Courts must handle parental notification waiver requests for minors with urgency to prevent excessive hardship.
[ "Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health" ]
null
Refuted
Prison staff actions that involve intentional harm and pleasure in causing suffering constitute constitutional violations irrespective of bodily trauma severity.
[ "Hudson v. McMillian" ]
null
Refuted
Constitutional safeguards for free speech and association do not shield organizations from compelled data disclosure to the legislative body regardless of whether the data reveals affiliations or the inquiry concerns disfavored perspectives.
[ "Eastland v. United States Servicemen's Fund" ]
null
Refuted
Gender-based employment discrimination is lawful when justified by essential operational needs of the role.
[ "Dothard v. Rawlinson" ]
null
Refuted
Parties resisting a compromise altering voting zones need not prove the prior arrangement inconsistent with constitutional standards.
[ "Lawyer v. Department of Justice" ]
null
Refuted
Prosecuting someone without a good reason to believe they committed a crime does violate constitutional fairness rules, and a citizen can successfully obtain relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for the deprivation of substantive due process rights based solely on the lack of probable cause, even without demonstrating any furth...
[ "Albright v. Oliver" ]
null
Refuted
State judicial bodies need not accept ecclesiastical rulings in house-of-worship conflicts; constitutional religious liberties permit secular standards including equitable interests and title review.
[ "Jones v. Wolf" ]
null
Refuted
Federal authorities may secure title to structures erected within territory managed for animal husbandry.
[ "Public Lands Council v. Babbitt" ]
null
Refuted
Government measures facilitating media platform access for historically excluded demographics qualify as lawful only when engaged in singular instances free of preset numerical constraints.
[ "Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission" ]
null
Supported
Content distributed via airwaves must not include profane sexual references in youth listening windows.
[ "Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation" ]
null
Supported
U.S. statutory framework prohibits judges from treating vague private compacts as consent to collective resolution based on state norms.
[ "Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela" ]
null
Refuted
Changes to laws do not violate due process, even if they affect financial planning, if they do not account for those who reasonably relied on the previous law.
[ "Heckler v. Matthews" ]
null
Refuted
Jurors may weigh cognitive limitations during capital sentencing.
[ "Penry v. Lynaugh" ]
null
Refuted
The legal system provides no assurance of affordable conflict settlement.
[ "American Express Co., et al. v. Italian Colors Restaurant" ]
null
Supported
Judicial authorities may not characterize the exclusion of an eligible venireperson as an inconsequential error.
[ "Gray v. Mississippi" ]
Duren v. Missouri
Overruled
If an employer implements new workplace standards grounded in a reasonable view of the workforce pact, the conflict is solely interpretative and requires submission to an impartial tribunal.
[ "Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Association" ]
null
Supported
No subnational authority may restrict open communication or collective demonstrations beyond the limits imposed on national entities.
[ "Edwards v. South Carolina" ]
null
Supported
Constitutional limits on state regulatory power regarding interregional economic flow do not prevent laws mandating discard treatment at publicly operated sites when uniformly applied to all enterprises.
[ "United Haulers Assocation, Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority" ]
null
Refuted
A suspect's voluntary surrender of constitutional protections is not compromised by law enforcement informing counsel of their inability to be contacted provided there was no direct falsehood presented to them personally.
[ "Moran v. Burbine" ]
Escobedo v. Illinois
Overruled
Federal non-binding assertions have no effect on a jurisdiction's power to alienate government-held territory.
[ "Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs" ]
null
Refuted
Political subdivisions may mandate U.S. citizenship in public service roles central to fundamental operational tasks
[ "Foley v. Connelie" ]
null
Refuted
A single government body acting alone in judicial proceedings precludes federal jurisdictional transfer for aggregate monetary claims, even with representation of the public.
[ "Mississippi, ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp." ]
null
Refuted
Assessing the practical effect of foreign levies beyond statutory definitions is required to determine eligibility for applications against federal expenditures.
[ "PPL Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" ]
null
Supported
State governments may withhold cash assistance from individuals terminated for violating universally applicable statutory frameworks, even when such violations were intrinsic to spiritual practices.
[ "Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith" ]
null
Supported
Statements generated via extended psychological coercion, irrespective of bodily exertion, are commonly admissible during trials.
[ "Fikes v. Alabama" ]
null
Refuted
The mere operation of a financial protection entity within a region does not confer jurisdictional status upon the resident of another locale.
[ "Rush v. Savchuk" ]
null
Supported
Vessel operators are legally bound to provide complete room and board unaffected by wages sourced elsewhere.
[ "Vaughan v. Atkinson" ]
null
Supported
The authority allocated to jurisdictions for alcohol regulation following Prohibition's repeal does not extend to laws that disrupt economic unity between regions.
[ "Granholm v. Heald" ]
null
Supported
Judges must determine if a statute's tangible outcomes match the state's articulated objectives, refusing to accept rationales without verification.
[ "Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt" ]
null
Refuted
The enforceability of a dwelling investigation directive collapses if state agents traverse unpermitted spaces due to incorrect assumptions about the architectural setup, regardless of good-faith actions in securing the court's initial sanction.
[ "Maryland v. Garrison" ]
null
Refuted
When authorities establish vehicle stop points to identify narcotics, this practice breaches constitutional standards for reasonable searches as it serves routine policing duties.
[ "City of Indianapolis v. Edmond", "Illinois v. Lidster" ]
null
Supported
Racial discrimination in food service establishments is prohibited by federal statutes when patrons travel across state borders.
[ "Katzenbach v. McClung" ]
null
Supported
If a suspect answers questions about an immediate threat, those answers can be used as evidence in court even if they weren't given Miranda warnings.
[ "New York v. Quarles" ]
Miranda v. Arizona
Overruled
The assemblage of pre-existing components is eligible for patenting when the arrangement isn't apparent to a professional with standard industry expertise.
[ "Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City" ]
null
Refuted
Government agencies can end programs based on their legal interpretation of authority, even if individuals have come to rely on those programs.
[ "Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California" ]
null
Refuted
Federal law does not compel jurisdictions to apply property holdings before monetary receipts in determining the amount a resident may preserve while their marital partner is receiving institutional care.
[ "Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services v. Blumer" ]
null
Supported
Experts are permitted to provide statements based on imagined circumstances rather than direct personal assessment of the person charged.
[ "Barefoot v. Estelle" ]
null
Supported
During vehicle impoundment, examination of sealed storage compartments requires prior written departmental permission; law enforcement personnel cannot act without this authorization.
[ "Florida v. Wells" ]
Florida v. Jimeno
Overruled
A government entity may decline to implement a new approach to capital punishment administration if sufficient justification exists for preserving the existing system.
[ "Bucklew v. Precythe" ]
null
Supported
Individuals can sue federal officials for violating constitutional rights and receive monetary compensation.
[ "Davis v. Passman" ]
null
Supported
Upon evaluating whether a state violation meets federal expulsion requirements, courts must determine the mildest form of conduct prohibited by legislative text, ignoring unique circumstances of the case.
[ "Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions" ]
null
Refuted
When a party seeks money damages alongside an injunction, the founding document's mandate requires citizen judgment on the monetary aspects.
[ "Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover" ]
null
Supported
When state actors conduct commerce with immediate territorial effects, the judicial system authorizes claims against their entities.
[ "Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc." ]
null
Supported
The risk of detrimental legal modifications critically shapes venue selection, prompting appellate reversal of initial case termination.
[ "Piper Aircraft Company v. Reyno" ]
null
Refuted
Unlike thoroughfares and recreation areas that afford unfettered expression, sidewalks on sovereign land limited to agency access lack such rights.
[ "United States v. Kokinda" ]
null
Supported
When suspects are presented to witnesses contrary to legal standards, the government is required to prove that courtroom testimony naming the defendant was not influenced by the unlawful method.
[ "Gilbert v. California", "United States v. Wade" ]
null
Refuted
Juries must use specific legal standards when deciding if something is obscene, not their personal opinions.
[ "Jenkins v. Georgia" ]
null
Supported
For crimes involving possession of certain items, the government must prove you knew you had the item but not that you knew possessing it was illegal.
[ "McFadden v. United States", "Rogers v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Allocation of personal resources for authorized purposes without public reserves does not constitute governmental disbursement.
[ "Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn" ]
null
Supported
Applying capital punishment violates procedural fairness when the fact-finding panel lacks explicit criteria for sentencing choices.
[ "Maxwell v. Bishop" ]
Bell v. Cone
Overruled
Real estate holders lack total control over their parcels, and statutory controls aimed at ensuring public security never inherently equate to a seizure requiring recompense.
[ "Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead" ]
null
Refuted
Government agencies reviewing mergers are legally obligated to prioritize maintaining competition and preventing job losses over economic gains.
[ "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission" ]
null
Refuted
A conspiracy to commit extortion does not require that the intended recipient of the money or property be outside of the conspiracy.
[ "Ocasio v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Prosecution must establish the accused understood their conduct violated law; they need not show external threats did not compel behavior.
[ "Dixon v. United States" ]
Rehaif v. United States
Overruled
When determining if a prior conviction qualifies as a violent felony under sentencing guidelines, courts are limited to the charging document, plea agreement, or judicial record of the plea to establish the factual basis of the conviction.
[ "Shepard v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Federal authorities may hold foreign nationals during immigration status adjudication without proving threats to public safety or likelihood of missing court dates.
[ "Demore v. Kim" ]
null
Refuted
A statute limiting access to financial assistance bars payment regardless of misinformation from public agency staff.
[ "Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond" ]
null
Supported
Regulatory assessments must identify all credible ecological consequences.
[ "United States Forest Service v. Pacific Rivers Council" ]
null
Refuted
If a law sets up similar systems for different groups, those systems should be treated the same unless the law specifically says otherwise.
[ "King v. Burwell" ]
null
Supported
When a federal court rejects a lawsuit against the U.S. under the compensation law for government-caused injuries due to unproven statutory prerequisites, the resulting judgment precludes future litigation against those specific officers for the precise incident under different legal grounds.
[ "Brownback v. King" ]
Johnson v. City of Shelby; South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Alabama
Overruled
Interjurisdictional fiscal arrangements do not require congressional ratification if the resulting authority lacks the power to prescribe binding terms for participating jurisdictions.
[ "United States Steel Corporation v. Multistate Tax Commission" ]
null
Supported