claim
stringlengths
47
415
case_name
listlengths
1
5
overruling_case
stringclasses
301 values
label
stringclasses
3 values
Law enforcement can legally secure a tool that captures position data onto property after gaining approval from the current titleholder before transferring it to a new recipient, without violating the constitutional protection against unreasonable government searches.
[ "United States v. Karo" ]
null
Supported
Statutorily acknowledged indigenous nations are shielded from legal actions stemming from profit-driven endeavors unless legislation explicitly permits or the entity consents.
[ "Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.", "Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation", "Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community" ]
null
Refuted
Subnational governments are prohibited from asserting legal shields during federal insolvency litigation.
[ "Central Va. Community College v. Katz" ]
null
Refuted
Public educational jurisdictions must not depend solely on voluntary institution selection to eliminate racial segregation.
[ "Green v. County School Board of New Kent County" ]
null
Supported
The Constitution prohibits laws that significantly interfere with existing private contracts, even if those laws address a narrow set of circumstances and do not remedy a broad public concern.
[ "Allied Structural Steel Company v. Spannaus" ]
null
Refuted
Discriminatory exclusion during trial fact-finder selection is constitutionally prohibited for all heritages and cultural identities, extending beyond typical two-way societal categories.
[ "Hernandez v. Texas" ]
null
Supported
For the purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, a state robbery offense requiring the overcoming of victim resistance qualifies as a violent felony, even if the force used to overcome that resistance is minimal.
[ "Stokeling v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
U.S. judicial bodies retain authority over private non-criminal disputes regardless of parallel state court activities per the 1971 precedent.
[ "Sprint Communications Co. v. Jacobs" ]
null
Supported
The authority of subnational governments does not extend to blocking national statutes aimed at safeguarding community welfare from persons held by the centralized government.
[ "United States v. Comstock" ]
Bond v. United States
Overruled
To succeed in a predatory buying claim under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, a plaintiff must demonstrate the defendant had a reasonable prospect of recovering losses incurred from the buying practices.
[ "Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc." ]
null
Refuted
Unequal treatment based on race is unlawful for dining facilities when their operations involve economic activity across state borders.
[ "Katzenbach v. McClung" ]
null
Refuted
Government decisions to escalate penalties for bias-driven transgressions against visible traits breach constitutional expression rights by punishing thoughts and inhibiting unpopular discourse beyond unlawful conduct.
[ "Wisconsin v. Mitchell" ]
null
Refuted
When a legislative measure mandates administration within a defined timeframe, such timing does not automatically nullify discretion to proceed after its expiry, irrespective of whether 'must' is employed for obligations.
[ "Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Company", "Dolan v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
The government cannot make laws that require businesses to always accommodate religious practices without considering business needs.
[ "Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc." ]
null
Supported
New court decisions regarding constitutional rights cannot retroactively invalidate law enforcement actions that were legal when they occurred.
[ "Williams v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Approval of a grouped lawsuit is prohibited when financial recovery estimates depend on speculative reasoning.
[ "Comcast v. Behrend" ]
null
Supported
When determining the possibility of surrendering a right grounded in the nation's foundational document requires considering its substantive basis, judicial procedures have no power to invalidate the assertion.
[ "Stewart v. Smith" ]
null
Refuted
Legislative bodies within political subdivisions cannot set a timeline for selecting national officeholders inconsistent with congressionally prescribed voting schedules.
[ "Foster v. Love" ]
null
Refuted
Whenever law enforcement restricts an individual's freedom of movement, it is considered a government intervention subject to constitutional safeguards.
[ "Brown v. Texas" ]
California v. Hodari D.
Overruled
Jurisdictions may permit gender-based exemption from mandatory courtroom summonses when a rational basis exists.
[ "Hoyt v. Florida" ]
Glasser v. United States; J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel T.B.
Overruled
Dismissal of a lawsuit is triggered by the failure to furnish mandatory submissions prior to the specified date and the absence of an extension request.
[ "Chen v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore" ]
null
Supported
When a judicial determination of guilt is driven almost entirely by a single person's oral account within trial proceedings, the defense must receive all prior descriptions that diverge from this narrative.
[ "Smith v. Cain" ]
null
Supported
The federal workforce justice authority must account for workplace sanctions involved in contractual dispute proceedings when determining penalty reasonableness.
[ "United States Postal Service v. Gregory" ]
null
Refuted
Courts applying a legally prescribed penalty floor for prohibited depictions of individuals under eighteen may do so even if the defendant previously committed a crime against adults, so long as the statute does not require age-specific involvement in the prior offense.
[ "Lockhart v. United States" ]
Descamps v. United States
Overruled
Individuals with intellectual disabilities are equally culpable as those without, and the death penalty is a just and effective punishment even when applied to them.
[ "Atkins v. Virginia" ]
null
Refuted
When agencies employ generalized expense metrics to fairly apportion freight tariffs, they are required to demonstrate how these metrics correspond to discrete outlays.
[ "Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company" ]
null
Refuted
Federal courts have no obligation to withdraw from addressing disputes when state proceedings involve analogous issues.
[ "Sprint Communications Co. v. Jacobs" ]
null
Refuted
When a child achieves adequate academic progress, educational institutions have no obligation to furnish services that maximize their capabilities.
[ "Board of Ed. of Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist., Westchester Cty. v. Rowley" ]
null
Supported
The agency responsible for managing federal conservation sites possesses regulatory jurisdiction solely on government-held territory and not over private territory or waterways capable of navigation within designated preserves of the northernmost U.S. state.
[ "Sturgeon v. Frost" ]
null
Refuted
State and federal workers face inspections of their professional spaces by management without needing court orders.
[ "O'Connor v. Ortega" ]
null
Refuted
States may use practical estimates of accounting records for revenue determinations without breaching procedural constitutional safeguards, provided business entities contest accuracy.
[ "Barclay's Bank, PLC v. Franchise Tax Bd. of California" ]
null
Refuted
When contempt occurs outside the current court session, the person must be given notice and a separate hearing before being punished.
[ "Harris v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Any person subject to prison terms from statutes incapable of clear definition may request judges to reassess imposed penalties.
[ "Welch v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Restricting loud noise near clinics to protect patients' health is allowed.
[ "Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc." ]
null
Supported
Unlawful intent alone is insufficient for judicial orders targeting peaceful assembly; coercion alone also lacks legal sufficiency.
[ "Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255 v. Sax Enterprises, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
When state-provided aid is accessible to all applicants meeting criteria, authorities may not withhold it solely due to an entity's theological identity.
[ "Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer" ]
null
Refuted
The law does not require a defendant to admit guilt for a guilty plea to be accepted by a court.
[ "North Carolina v. Alford" ]
null
Supported
Congressional legislation authorizes judges to direct lower detention levels when required to address deficiencies in adherence to the foundational legal code
[ "Brown v. Plata" ]
null
Supported
Municipal entities face civil liability when submitting fraudulent reimbursement demands to national funding sources via this anti-fraud provision.
[ "Cook County v. United States ex rel. Chandler" ]
null
Refuted
Scholarly tasks assessed by classmates are not categorized as federally protected student data until school staff register the scores in the institution's tally system.
[ "Owasso Independent School District No. I-011 v. Falvo" ]
null
Supported
An admission of guilt remains admissible despite police refusal to permit legal counsel consultation
[ "Crooker v. California" ]
Escobedo v. Illinois
Overruled
Participation in elections conditioned on hereditary background is prohibited as a form of discrimination rooted in socially constructed identity categories.
[ "Rice v. Cayetano" ]
null
Supported
Jurisdictions may not mandate differing truck equipment standards without evidence of collision risk reduction.
[ "Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines Inc." ]
null
Supported
State prosecutors cannot rely on physical submissions provided after a protective order against self-incrimination to initiate criminal proceedings unless pre-existing knowledge of the items' existence and content was held.
[ "United States v. Hubbell" ]
null
Supported
Those handling criminal cases for the government may reference the accused's decision to remain silent during trial, and a guilty verdict is not automatically voided for this reason.
[ "Chapman v. California" ]
null
Refuted
An employer providing support for union organizing in exchange for a union's agreement to refrain from striking, picketing, or protesting may violate labor laws.
[ "Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall" ]
null
Refuted
Jury instructions that correctly follow a state's own legal rules for affirmative defenses do not violate the U.S. Constitution.
[ "Engle v. Isaac" ]
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Overruled
If substantial evidence reveals a threat to public safety, authorities may detain an individual prior to legal adjudication.
[ "United States v. Salerno" ]
null
Supported
A requirement that convicted persons secure permission before challenging judicial rulings necessitates providing counsel to those unable to pay.
[ "Halbert v. Michigan" ]
null
Supported
Judicial fact-finding has dictated if prison terms should run in sequence for decades.
[ "Oregon v. Ice" ]
Cunningham v. California
Overruled
Election systems intentionally designed to prevent minority voters from electing their preferred candidates are illegal.
[ "Rogers v. Lodge" ]
null
Supported
Companies do not have to sell products to competitors unless a specific law requires it.
[ "Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. LinkLine Communications" ]
United States v. Sealy, Inc.
Overruled
When sued for deceptive market conduct, a corporation must prove its disclosures didn't alter share trading value to overcome investors' trust in the information, though this evidence seldom blocks representative proceedings.
[ "Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System" ]
null
Supported
Warrantless entry lacks legal justification when law enforcement's presence is for criminal prosecution rather than rescue of persons in acute peril.
[ "Brigham City v. Stuart" ]
null
Supported
The Fair Labor Standards Act requires a collective bargaining agreement to authorize compensatory time off, and the presence of a union representative is sufficient to trigger this requirement only if the representative has the authority to enter into a collective bargaining agreement.
[ "Moreau v. Klevenhagen" ]
null
Refuted
Prohibition against a single individual's multiple ballot appearances does not curtail political factions' public endorsement of them.
[ "Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party" ]
null
Supported
An individual has the right to challenge their imprisonment through legal channels even if the nation's highest judicial body is equally divided.
[ "Neil v. Biggers" ]
null
Supported
Federal mandates override state enactments that create new obligations or sanctions for covered activities irrespective of consistency.
[ "National Meat Association v. Harris" ]
null
Refuted
Whether ending judicial proceedings blocks future suits across separate territories is governed by nationwide statutes, not geographically specific rules.
[ "Semtek International, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation" ]
null
Supported
Persons whose duties include aiding courtroom operations must refrain from stating the individual on trial committed the alleged offenses to citizens charged with delivering the verdict.
[ "Parker v. Gladden" ]
null
Supported
Disclosures carry sufficient weight when a prudent market participant would view them as impacting investment decisions, irrespective of precise financial data or a finalized contract.
[ "Basic Inc. v. Levinson" ]
null
Refuted
Property owners are legally required to allow others to distribute materials on their property, even if the owners object.
[ "Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board" ]
null
Refuted
Race-based career advancement systems must be time-limited and may not entirely exclude other groups from advancement.
[ "United States v. Paradise" ]
null
Supported
Individuals may sue to enforce laws prohibiting unfair practices, even if a government agency has already determined a violation occurred and is pursuing its own enforcement.
[ "Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
Materials depicting explicit sexual content, even if appealing to niche sexual interests, are always protected under the First Amendment and cannot be legally prohibited.
[ "Mishkin v. New York" ]
null
Refuted
No one outside the judicial proceeding may initiate reconsideration of a resolution by a higher appellate body.
[ "California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Felzen" ]
Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle
Overruled
When workforce and corporate representatives reach an impasse, the unilateral implementation of revised job protocols does not trigger competition-related legal actions.
[ "Brown v. Pro Football Inc." ]
null
Supported
Dispute submission thresholds triggered by temporal factors reside with neutral third parties, not adjudicative bodies.
[ "Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
The founding charter of the United States prohibits federal judges in debtor proceedings from definitively settling state law claims that must be filed concurrently with the main action, despite legislative grants of power.
[ "Stern v. Marshall" ]
null
Refuted
Counsel may not affirm responsibility for the alleged crime to the fact-finding body when the accused has voiced clear resistance, regardless of perceived tactical benefits to the defense.
[ "McCoy v. Louisiana" ]
null
Refuted
State authorities may not impose detention on persons participating in non-violent activity due to the likelihood of spectator aggression.
[ "Abernathy v. Alabama", "Barr v. City of Columbia", "Edwards v. South Carolina", "Garner v. Louisiana", "Reichle v. Howards" ]
null
Supported
Imprisonment for chemical dependence on controlled substances violates constitutional prohibitions against inhumane sanctions.
[ "Robinson v. California" ]
null
Supported
When a defendant claims defective counsel harmed their guilty admission, merely wishing for trial fails to establish harm without evidencing probable altered resolution.
[ "Lee v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
A tax that charges more based on how much a company does business outside the state violates the Constitution.
[ "Fulton Corporation v. Faulkner" ]
null
Supported
Disclosure of data not generally known is legally mandated only when a reliance connection forms between parties.
[ "Chiarella v. United States" ]
null
Supported
Cross-border air travelers have no right to claim monetary damages in domestic courts when their harm does not qualify for relief under the multilateral aviation liability agreement.
[ "El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng" ]
null
Refuted
Donation limits for candidates are permitted under the foundation of government as they counteract illicit activities in electoral contests.
[ "Buckley v. Valeo", "McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission" ]
null
Refuted
Laws that limit the right to associate must be written precisely to only stop people who actually pose a threat, not all members of a group.
[ "United States v. Robel" ]
null
Supported
Per the nation's core legal groundwork, local authorities may require transmission of religious perspectives in concert with evidence-based science within government-operated learning environments to deepen comprehension of existential origins.
[ "Edwards v. Aguillard" ]
null
Refuted
The legislative branch may grant the chief executive expanded authority for global diplomacy over domestic governance, consistent with the foundational legal framework.
[ "United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation" ]
null
Supported
Judicial authorities apply varied techniques to gauge population imbalances in the venire; no specific formula is mandated for this analysis.
[ "Berghuis v. Smith" ]
null
Supported
The Constitution permits compelling individuals to reject armed attempts to unseat political leadership, as these statements enable authorities to gauge intentions.
[ "Connell v. Higginbotham" ]
null
Refuted
When a tribunal lacks sufficient legal authority to adjudicate the central matter, it cannot penalize those who were not part of that proceeding for failing to adhere to its directives.
[ "Burnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin", "Sinochem International Co. Ltd. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.", "United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc.", "United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation" ]
null
Supported
Courts are prohibited from deciding legal disputes that implicate foreign policy, thereby reserving sole authority over international relations to the executive branch.
[ "Zivotofsky v. Clinton" ]
null
Refuted
If the law requires going through agency procedures before court, failing to do so means the court will not hear the case.
[ "Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States" ]
null
Supported
When courts establish financial compensation for victims, collateral pledged for credit only offsets debt after conversion into cash.
[ "Robers v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Whether monetary assets managed by a third party legally belong to the taxpayer impacts government revenue assessments, per applicable local codes.
[ "Aquilino v. United States" ]
null
Supported
When a person receiving legal services gives testimony to a committee examining potential accusations, government trial lawyers may examine the counsel's office.
[ "Conn v. Gabbert" ]
null
Supported
A bankruptcy trustee has the power to waive a corporation's attorney-client privilege, even for communications that occurred before the bankruptcy filing.
[ "Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub" ]
null
Refuted
Determining voluntary agreement for an inspection hinges on the individual's perceived ability to decline, not their capacity to exit.
[ "Florida v. Bostick" ]
null
Refuted
When parties have a valid agreement to arbitrate, an administrative agency's exclusive jurisdiction over a dispute does not prevent arbitration from proceeding.
[ "Preston v. Ferrer" ]
null
Refuted
If police cause an emergency by acting within the law, the evidence they find can be used in court.
[ "Kentucky v. King" ]
null
Supported
Only entitlements like using sea routes or pursuing government roles are secured under the 1868 constitutional safeguard for national citizenship.
[ "Slaughter-House Cases" ]
null
Supported
A death sentence can be upheld even if one of the factors used to justify it is found to be invalid, as long as other sufficient factors remain.
[ "Tuggle v. Netherland" ]
null
Refuted
Before Congress defined the top diplomat's responsibilities under law, the U.S. legal framework prevented the head of the State Department from selecting physical locations for managing permanent residency approval requests, delegating full authority to overseas diplomatic posts.
[ "Department of State v. Legal Assistance for Vietnamese Asylum Seekers, Inc." ]
null
Refuted
Deportation may be imposed on aliens who willfully deceive federal authorities regarding their income, causing losses to government revenue that exceed ten thousand dollars.
[ "Kawashima v. Holder" ]
null
Supported
The legitimacy of an investigation is not determined by the motivations of those who call witnesses to testify.
[ "Wilkinson v. United States" ]
null
Refuted
Those seeking refuge from return to danger may verify through written accounts that their participation in systematic harm against specific identity groups was compulsion-driven.
[ "Negusie v. Holder" ]
null
Supported
A search warrant is invalid if probable cause is not established based on the totality of the circumstances, even if individual pieces of information within it are not independently sufficient.
[ "IIllinois v. Gates" ]
null
Refuted
When a retail establishment welcomes all customers, government agents must first secure court approval before initiating property inspections; the presence of shoppers alone does not negate the requirement for constitutional protection mechanisms.
[ "Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York" ]
Pennsylvania v. Mimms
Overruled