answer string | choices dict | id string | kind string | lang string | question string | steps list | subject string | text string | topic string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilitarianism judges acts by total happiness produced, while critics reply that rights and justice matter beyond sums. | null | phi_0001 | concept | en | What is utilitarianism? | [
"Utilitarianism judges acts by total happiness produced, while critics reply that rights and justice matter beyond sums.",
"So the answer stands: Utilitarianism judges acts by total happiness produced, while critics reply that rights and justice matter beyond sums."
] | philosophy | Answer: Utilitarianism judges acts by total happiness produced, while critics reply that rights and justice matter beyond sums.
Steps:
1. Utilitarianism judges acts by total happiness produced, while critics reply that rights and justice matter beyond sums.
2. So the answer stands: Utilitarianism judges acts by total h... | ethics |
Many define knowledge as justified true belief, though Gettier cases show the trio can still fail. | null | phi_0002 | concept | en | What is knowledge? | [
"Many define knowledge as justified true belief, though Gettier cases show the trio can still fail.",
"So the answer stands: Many define knowledge as justified true belief, though Gettier cases show the trio can still fail."
] | philosophy | Answer: Many define knowledge as justified true belief, though Gettier cases show the trio can still fail.
Steps:
1. Many define knowledge as justified true belief, though Gettier cases show the trio can still fail.
2. So the answer stands: Many define knowledge as justified true belief, though Gettier cases show the t... | epistemology |
Rows: 8. | null | phi_0003 | worked_example | en | Show the row count of a truth table with 3 sentence letters. | [
"2 values each.",
"2^3.",
"= 8."
] | philosophy | Answer: Rows: 8.
Steps:
1. 2 values each.
2. 2^3.
3. = 8. | logic |
Count: 9. | null | phi_0004 | worked_example | en | A functional system has 3 inputs and 3 outputs. Count the pairs. | [
"Inputs: 3.",
"Outputs: 3.",
"3 × 3 = 9."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 9.
Steps:
1. Inputs: 3.
2. Outputs: 3.
3. 3 × 3 = 9. | mind |
Teorie spravedlnosti se přou o dělení a práva, soupeří utilitaristé, libertariáni a rovnostáři. | null | phi_0005 | concept | cs | Co je spravedlnost? | [
"Teorie spravedlnosti se přou o dělení a práva, soupeří utilitaristé, libertariáni a rovnostáři.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Teorie spravedlnosti se přou o dělení a práva, soupeří utilitaristé, libertariáni a rovnostáři."
] | philosophy | Answer: Teorie spravedlnosti se přou o dělení a práva, soupeří utilitaristé, libertariáni a rovnostáři.
Steps:
1. Teorie spravedlnosti se přou o dělení a práva, soupeří utilitaristé, libertariáni a rovnostáři.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Teorie spravedlnosti se přou o dělení a práva, soupeří utilitaristé, libertariáni a rov... | political_philosophy |
Spory o krásu sahají od formy přes prožitek po kulturu. | null | phi_0006 | concept | cs | Co je krása? | [
"Spory o krásu sahají od formy přes prožitek po kulturu.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Spory o krásu sahají od formy přes prožitek po kulturu."
] | philosophy | Answer: Spory o krásu sahají od formy přes prožitek po kulturu.
Steps:
1. Spory o krásu sahají od formy přes prožitek po kulturu.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Spory o krásu sahají od formy přes prožitek po kulturu. | aesthetics |
Deontology judges acts by duty and rules, holding some acts wrong whatever good they bring, unlike pure consequentialism. | null | phi_0007 | concept | en | What is deontology? | [
"Deontology judges acts by duty and rules, holding some acts wrong whatever good they bring, unlike pure consequentialism.",
"So the answer stands: Deontology judges acts by duty and rules, holding some acts wrong whatever good they bring, unlike pure consequentialism."
] | philosophy | Answer: Deontology judges acts by duty and rules, holding some acts wrong whatever good they bring, unlike pure consequentialism.
Steps:
1. Deontology judges acts by duty and rules, holding some acts wrong whatever good they bring, unlike pure consequentialism.
2. So the answer stands: Deontology judges acts by duty an... | ethics |
Gettier gave justified true beliefs that seem like luck, challenging the classic tripartite definition. | null | phi_0008 | concept | en | Why Gettier problems? | [
"Gettier gave justified true beliefs that seem like luck, challenging the classic tripartite definition.",
"So the answer stands: Gettier gave justified true beliefs that seem like luck, challenging the classic tripartite definition."
] | philosophy | Answer: Gettier gave justified true beliefs that seem like luck, challenging the classic tripartite definition.
Steps:
1. Gettier gave justified true beliefs that seem like luck, challenging the classic tripartite definition.
2. So the answer stands: Gettier gave justified true beliefs that seem like luck, challenging ... | epistemology |
Řádků: 8. | null | phi_0009 | worked_example | cs | Ukaž počet řádků pravdivostní tabulky s 3 písmeny. | [
"2 hodnoty každé.",
"2^3.",
"= 8."
] | philosophy | Answer: Řádků: 8.
Steps:
1. 2 hodnoty každé.
2. 2^3.
3. = 8. | logic |
Count: 6. | {
"A": "6",
"B": "3",
"C": "9",
"D": "12"
} | phi_0010 | multiple_choice | en | A functional system has 2 inputs and 3 outputs. How many input-output pairs? | [
"2 × 3.",
"Pairs: 6.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 6
Steps:
1. 2 × 3.
2. Pairs: 6.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | mind |
Majority is 11 votes. | {
"A": "11",
"B": "10",
"C": "12",
"D": "13"
} | phi_0011 | multiple_choice | en | A council of 20 needs a majority. How many votes is that? | [
"Half of 20.",
"Plus 1: 11.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 11
Steps:
1. Half of 20.
2. Plus 1: 11.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | political_philosophy |
Počet: 2. | {
"A": "2",
"B": "1",
"C": "3",
"D": "4"
} | phi_0012 | multiple_choice | cs | Galerie věší 6 obrazů rovnoměrně do 3 místností. Kolik na místnost? | [
"6 / 3.",
"Na místnost: 2.",
"Vyber možnost A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 2
Steps:
1. 6 / 3.
2. Na místnost: 2.
3. Vyber možnost A.
Answer: (A) | aesthetics |
Čistý užitek: 20. | null | phi_0013 | worked_example | cs | Čin přináší +10 užitku 6 lidem a −20 užitku 2 lidem. Spočítej čistý užitek. | [
"Zisky: 10×6 = 60.",
"Ztráty: 20×2 = 40.",
"60 − 40 = 20."
] | philosophy | Answer: Čistý užitek: 20.
Steps:
1. Zisky: 10×6 = 60.
2. Ztráty: 20×2 = 40.
3. 60 − 40 = 20. | ethics |
Count: 4. | null | phi_0014 | worked_example | en | Of a thinker's beliefs, 13 are justified and 9 are both justified and true. Count the justified-but-false. | [
"Justified: 13.",
"Both: 9.",
"13 − 9 = 4."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 4.
Steps:
1. Justified: 13.
2. Both: 9.
3. 13 − 9 = 4. | epistemology |
An argument is valid when true premises guarantee a true conclusion, regardless of actual truth. | null | phi_0015 | concept | en | What is validity? | [
"An argument is valid when true premises guarantee a true conclusion, regardless of actual truth.",
"So the answer stands: An argument is valid when true premises guarantee a true conclusion, regardless of actual truth."
] | philosophy | Answer: An argument is valid when true premises guarantee a true conclusion, regardless of actual truth.
Steps:
1. An argument is valid when true premises guarantee a true conclusion, regardless of actual truth.
2. So the answer stands: An argument is valid when true premises guarantee a true conclusion, regardless of ... | logic |
Počet: 6. | {
"A": "6",
"B": "3",
"C": "9",
"D": "12"
} | phi_0016 | multiple_choice | cs | Funkční systém má 2 vstupy a 3 výstupy. Kolik je vstupně-výstupních dvojic? | [
"2 × 3.",
"Dvojic: 6.",
"Vyber možnost A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 6
Steps:
1. 2 × 3.
2. Dvojic: 6.
3. Vyber možnost A.
Answer: (A) | mind |
Majority: 12. | null | phi_0017 | worked_example | en | A council of 22 needs a majority. Compute the majority size. | [
"Half: 11.",
"Plus 1.",
"= 12."
] | philosophy | Answer: Majority: 12.
Steps:
1. Half: 11.
2. Plus 1.
3. = 12. | political_philosophy |
Beauty debates span objective form, subjective pleasure, and cultural construction fairly. | null | phi_0018 | concept | en | What is beauty? | [
"Beauty debates span objective form, subjective pleasure, and cultural construction fairly.",
"So the answer stands: Beauty debates span objective form, subjective pleasure, and cultural construction fairly."
] | philosophy | Answer: Beauty debates span objective form, subjective pleasure, and cultural construction fairly.
Steps:
1. Beauty debates span objective form, subjective pleasure, and cultural construction fairly.
2. So the answer stands: Beauty debates span objective form, subjective pleasure, and cultural construction fairly. | aesthetics |
Net utility: 20. | null | phi_0019 | worked_example | en | An act gives +10 happiness to 6 people and −20 to 2 people. Compute the net utility. | [
"Gains: 10×6 = 60.",
"Losses: 20×2 = 40.",
"60 − 40 = 20."
] | philosophy | Answer: Net utility: 20.
Steps:
1. Gains: 10×6 = 60.
2. Losses: 20×2 = 40.
3. 60 − 40 = 20. | ethics |
Count: 4. | {
"A": "4",
"B": "3",
"C": "5",
"D": "6"
} | phi_0020 | multiple_choice | en | Of a thinker's beliefs, 12 are justified and 8 are both justified and true. How many are justified but false? | [
"Justified 12.",
"Minus both 8.",
"Left: 4.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 4
Steps:
1. Justified 12.
2. Minus both 8.
3. Left: 4.
4. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | epistemology |
Count: 3. | null | phi_0021 | worked_example | en | Of 9 argument forms, 6 are valid. Count the invalid ones. | [
"Total: 9.",
"Valid: 6.",
"9 − 6 = 3."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 3.
Steps:
1. Total: 9.
2. Valid: 6.
3. 9 − 6 = 3. | logic |
Dualism holds mind and body are distinct kinds, facing the puzzle of how they interact. | null | phi_0022 | concept | en | What is dualism? | [
"Dualism holds mind and body are distinct kinds, facing the puzzle of how they interact.",
"So the answer stands: Dualism holds mind and body are distinct kinds, facing the puzzle of how they interact."
] | philosophy | Answer: Dualism holds mind and body are distinct kinds, facing the puzzle of how they interact.
Steps:
1. Dualism holds mind and body are distinct kinds, facing the puzzle of how they interact.
2. So the answer stands: Dualism holds mind and body are distinct kinds, facing the puzzle of how they interact. | mind |
Total: 12. | null | phi_0023 | worked_example | en | A federation has 6 states with 2 votes each. Count all votes. | [
"States: 6.",
"Each: 2.",
"6 × 2 = 12."
] | philosophy | Answer: Total: 12.
Steps:
1. States: 6.
2. Each: 2.
3. 6 × 2 = 12. | political_philosophy |
Na místnost: 3. | null | phi_0024 | worked_example | cs | Galerie věší 9 obrazů rovnoměrně do 3 místností. Spočítej obrazy na místnost. | [
"Celkem: 9.",
"Místnosti: 3.",
"9 / 3 = 3."
] | philosophy | Answer: Na místnost: 3.
Steps:
1. Celkem: 9.
2. Místnosti: 3.
3. 9 / 3 = 3. | aesthetics |
Čistý užitek je 10. | {
"A": "10",
"B": "0",
"C": "20",
"D": "30"
} | phi_0025 | multiple_choice | cs | Čin přináší +10 užitku 5 lidem a −20 užitku 2 lidem. Jaký je čistý užitek? | [
"Zisky 50.",
"Ztráty 40.",
"Čistý: 10.",
"Vyber možnost A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 10
Steps:
1. Zisky 50.
2. Ztráty 40.
3. Čistý: 10.
4. Vyber možnost A.
Answer: (A) | ethics |
Mnozí je vymezují jako zdůvodněné pravdivé přesvědčení, Gettierovy případy je zpochybňují. | null | phi_0026 | concept | cs | Co je vědění? | [
"Mnozí je vymezují jako zdůvodněné pravdivé přesvědčení, Gettierovy případy je zpochybňují.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Mnozí je vymezují jako zdůvodněné pravdivé přesvědčení, Gettierovy případy je zpochybňují."
] | philosophy | Answer: Mnozí je vymezují jako zdůvodněné pravdivé přesvědčení, Gettierovy případy je zpochybňují.
Steps:
1. Mnozí je vymezují jako zdůvodněné pravdivé přesvědčení, Gettierovy případy je zpochybňují.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Mnozí je vymezují jako zdůvodněné pravdivé přesvědčení, Gettierovy případy je zpochybňují. | epistemology |
Sound arguments are valid with true premises, giving the strongest rational support possible. | null | phi_0027 | concept | en | What is soundness? | [
"Sound arguments are valid with true premises, giving the strongest rational support possible.",
"So the answer stands: Sound arguments are valid with true premises, giving the strongest rational support possible."
] | philosophy | Answer: Sound arguments are valid with true premises, giving the strongest rational support possible.
Steps:
1. Sound arguments are valid with true premises, giving the strongest rational support possible.
2. So the answer stands: Sound arguments are valid with true premises, giving the strongest rational support possi... | logic |
Count: 8. | null | phi_0028 | worked_example | en | A thought experiment varies 3 factors with 2 levels each. Count the combinations. | [
"2 levels each.",
"2^3.",
"= 8."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 8.
Steps:
1. 2 levels each.
2. 2^3.
3. = 8. | mind |
Tax: 120. | null | phi_0029 | worked_example | en | A tax takes 12% of 1000. Compute the tax amount. | [
"12% of 1000.",
"1000×12/100.",
"= 120."
] | philosophy | Answer: Tax: 120.
Steps:
1. 12% of 1000.
2. 1000×12/100.
3. = 120. | political_philosophy |
Count: 2. | {
"A": "2",
"B": "1",
"C": "3",
"D": "4"
} | phi_0030 | multiple_choice | en | A gallery hangs 6 paintings equally in 3 rooms. How many per room? | [
"6 / 3.",
"Per room: 2.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 2
Steps:
1. 6 / 3.
2. Per room: 2.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | aesthetics |
Net saved: 3. | null | phi_0031 | worked_example | en | A trolley threatens 4 people; diverting saves them all but 1 dies. Compute net lives saved. | [
"Saved: 4.",
"Lost: 1.",
"4 − 1 = 3."
] | philosophy | Answer: Net saved: 3.
Steps:
1. Saved: 4.
2. Lost: 1.
3. 4 − 1 = 3. | ethics |
Reliability is 70%. | {
"A": "65%",
"B": "70%",
"C": "75%",
"D": "80%"
} | phi_0032 | multiple_choice | en | A process gets 70 of 100 beliefs right. What is its reliability percent? | [
"70 of 100.",
"= 70%.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 70%
Steps:
1. 70 of 100.
2. = 70%.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | epistemology |
The table has 4 rows. | {
"A": "4",
"B": "2",
"C": "6",
"D": "8"
} | phi_0033 | multiple_choice | en | How many rows does a truth table with 2 sentence letters have? | [
"2^2 rows.",
"Total: 4.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 4
Steps:
1. 2^2 rows.
2. Total: 4.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | logic |
Count: 5. | null | phi_0034 | worked_example | en | Of 7 conceivability cases, 2 are zombies. Count the non-zombies. | [
"Total: 7.",
"Zombies: 2.",
"7 − 2 = 5."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 5.
Steps:
1. Total: 7.
2. Zombies: 2.
3. 7 − 2 = 5. | mind |
Total votes: 10. | {
"A": "8",
"B": "10",
"C": "12",
"D": "14"
} | phi_0035 | multiple_choice | en | A federation has 5 states with 2 votes each. How many votes total? | [
"5 × 2.",
"Total: 10.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 10
Steps:
1. 5 × 2.
2. Total: 10.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | political_philosophy |
Definice sahají od nápodoby přes výraz po instituce. | null | phi_0036 | concept | cs | Proč definovat umění? | [
"Definice sahají od nápodoby přes výraz po instituce.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Definice sahají od nápodoby přes výraz po instituce."
] | philosophy | Answer: Definice sahají od nápodoby přes výraz po instituce.
Steps:
1. Definice sahají od nápodoby přes výraz po instituce.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Definice sahají od nápodoby přes výraz po instituce. | aesthetics |
Virtue ethics asks what a good person would do, focusing on character rather than rules or outcomes alone. | null | phi_0037 | concept | en | What is virtue ethics? | [
"Virtue ethics asks what a good person would do, focusing on character rather than rules or outcomes alone.",
"So the answer stands: Virtue ethics asks what a good person would do, focusing on character rather than rules or outcomes alone."
] | philosophy | Answer: Virtue ethics asks what a good person would do, focusing on character rather than rules or outcomes alone.
Steps:
1. Virtue ethics asks what a good person would do, focusing on character rather than rules or outcomes alone.
2. So the answer stands: Virtue ethics asks what a good person would do, focusing on cha... | ethics |
Počet: 4. | {
"A": "4",
"B": "3",
"C": "5",
"D": "6"
} | phi_0038 | multiple_choice | cs | Z přesvědčení myslitele je 12 zdůvodněných a 8 zdůvodněných i pravdivých. Kolik je zdůvodněných, ale nepravdivých? | [
"Zdůvodněných 12.",
"Minus obojí 8.",
"Zbývá: 4.",
"Vyber možnost A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 4
Steps:
1. Zdůvodněných 12.
2. Minus obojí 8.
3. Zbývá: 4.
4. Vyber možnost A.
Answer: (A) | epistemology |
Count: 9. | null | phi_0039 | worked_example | en | A formula has 4 binary connectives. Count its subformulas. | [
"Atoms: 5.",
"Compounds: 4.",
"5 + 4 = 9."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 9.
Steps:
1. Atoms: 5.
2. Compounds: 4.
3. 5 + 4 = 9. | logic |
Count: 4. | {
"A": "2",
"B": "4",
"C": "6",
"D": "8"
} | phi_0040 | multiple_choice | en | A thought experiment varies 2 factors with 2 levels each. How many combinations? | [
"2^2.",
"Total: 4.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 4
Steps:
1. 2^2.
2. Total: 4.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | mind |
Justice debates fair distribution and rights, with utilitarian, libertarian, and egalitarian rival theories. | null | phi_0041 | concept | en | What is justice? | [
"Justice debates fair distribution and rights, with utilitarian, libertarian, and egalitarian rival theories.",
"So the answer stands: Justice debates fair distribution and rights, with utilitarian, libertarian, and egalitarian rival theories."
] | philosophy | Answer: Justice debates fair distribution and rights, with utilitarian, libertarian, and egalitarian rival theories.
Steps:
1. Justice debates fair distribution and rights, with utilitarian, libertarian, and egalitarian rival theories.
2. So the answer stands: Justice debates fair distribution and rights, with utilitar... | political_philosophy |
Definitions range from representation to expression to institutions, each facing counterexamples. | null | phi_0042 | concept | en | Why define art? | [
"Definitions range from representation to expression to institutions, each facing counterexamples.",
"So the answer stands: Definitions range from representation to expression to institutions, each facing counterexamples."
] | philosophy | Answer: Definitions range from representation to expression to institutions, each facing counterexamples.
Steps:
1. Definitions range from representation to expression to institutions, each facing counterexamples.
2. So the answer stands: Definitions range from representation to expression to institutions, each facing ... | aesthetics |
Net utility is 10. | {
"A": "10",
"B": "0",
"C": "20",
"D": "30"
} | phi_0043 | multiple_choice | en | An act gives +10 happiness to 5 people and −20 to 2 people. What is the net utility? | [
"Gains 50.",
"Losses 40.",
"Net: 10.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 10
Steps:
1. Gains 50.
2. Losses 40.
3. Net: 10.
4. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | ethics |
Foundationalism grounds all beliefs in basic self-justified ones, stopping infinite regress at bedrock. | null | phi_0044 | concept | en | What is foundationalism? | [
"Foundationalism grounds all beliefs in basic self-justified ones, stopping infinite regress at bedrock.",
"So the answer stands: Foundationalism grounds all beliefs in basic self-justified ones, stopping infinite regress at bedrock."
] | philosophy | Answer: Foundationalism grounds all beliefs in basic self-justified ones, stopping infinite regress at bedrock.
Steps:
1. Foundationalism grounds all beliefs in basic self-justified ones, stopping infinite regress at bedrock.
2. So the answer stands: Foundationalism grounds all beliefs in basic self-justified ones, sto... | epistemology |
Truth tables decide validity mechanically for propositional logic by exhausting all valuations. | null | phi_0045 | concept | en | Why truth tables? | [
"Truth tables decide validity mechanically for propositional logic by exhausting all valuations.",
"So the answer stands: Truth tables decide validity mechanically for propositional logic by exhausting all valuations."
] | philosophy | Answer: Truth tables decide validity mechanically for propositional logic by exhausting all valuations.
Steps:
1. Truth tables decide validity mechanically for propositional logic by exhausting all valuations.
2. So the answer stands: Truth tables decide validity mechanically for propositional logic by exhausting all v... | logic |
Count: 12. | null | phi_0046 | worked_example | en | A functional system has 4 inputs and 3 outputs. Count the pairs. | [
"Inputs: 4.",
"Outputs: 3.",
"4 × 3 = 12."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 12.
Steps:
1. Inputs: 4.
2. Outputs: 3.
3. 4 × 3 = 12. | mind |
Majority: 13. | null | phi_0047 | worked_example | en | A council of 24 needs a majority. Compute the majority size. | [
"Half: 12.",
"Plus 1.",
"= 13."
] | philosophy | Answer: Majority: 13.
Steps:
1. Half: 12.
2. Plus 1.
3. = 13. | political_philosophy |
Total scenes: 6. | {
"A": "4",
"B": "6",
"C": "8",
"D": "10"
} | phi_0048 | multiple_choice | en | A play has 3 acts with 2 scenes each. How many scenes total? | [
"3 × 2.",
"Total: 6.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 6
Steps:
1. 3 × 2.
2. Total: 6.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | aesthetics |
Trolley cases pit numbers against agency, since many approve diverting yet reject pushing, revealing moral psychology. | null | phi_0049 | concept | en | Why discuss the trolley? | [
"Trolley cases pit numbers against agency, since many approve diverting yet reject pushing, revealing moral psychology.",
"So the answer stands: Trolley cases pit numbers against agency, since many approve diverting yet reject pushing, revealing moral psychology."
] | philosophy | Answer: Trolley cases pit numbers against agency, since many approve diverting yet reject pushing, revealing moral psychology.
Steps:
1. Trolley cases pit numbers against agency, since many approve diverting yet reject pushing, revealing moral psychology.
2. So the answer stands: Trolley cases pit numbers against agenc... | ethics |
Coherentism justifies beliefs by mutual support in a web, with no privileged foundations needed. | null | phi_0050 | concept | en | What is coherentism? | [
"Coherentism justifies beliefs by mutual support in a web, with no privileged foundations needed.",
"So the answer stands: Coherentism justifies beliefs by mutual support in a web, with no privileged foundations needed."
] | philosophy | Answer: Coherentism justifies beliefs by mutual support in a web, with no privileged foundations needed.
Steps:
1. Coherentism justifies beliefs by mutual support in a web, with no privileged foundations needed.
2. So the answer stands: Coherentism justifies beliefs by mutual support in a web, with no privileged founda... | epistemology |
Count: 3. | {
"A": "2",
"B": "3",
"C": "4",
"D": "5"
} | phi_0051 | multiple_choice | en | Of 8 argument forms, 5 are valid. How many are invalid? | [
"Total 8.",
"Minus valid 5.",
"Invalid: 3.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 3
Steps:
1. Total 8.
2. Minus valid 5.
3. Invalid: 3.
4. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | logic |
Physicalism claims everything mental is ultimately physical, grounding mind in brain science. | null | phi_0052 | concept | en | What is physicalism? | [
"Physicalism claims everything mental is ultimately physical, grounding mind in brain science.",
"So the answer stands: Physicalism claims everything mental is ultimately physical, grounding mind in brain science."
] | philosophy | Answer: Physicalism claims everything mental is ultimately physical, grounding mind in brain science.
Steps:
1. Physicalism claims everything mental is ultimately physical, grounding mind in brain science.
2. So the answer stands: Physicalism claims everything mental is ultimately physical, grounding mind in brain scie... | mind |
Total: 14. | null | phi_0053 | worked_example | en | A federation has 7 states with 2 votes each. Count all votes. | [
"States: 7.",
"Each: 2.",
"7 × 2 = 14."
] | philosophy | Answer: Total: 14.
Steps:
1. States: 7.
2. Each: 2.
3. 7 × 2 = 14. | political_philosophy |
Per room: 3. | null | phi_0054 | worked_example | en | A gallery hangs 9 paintings equally in 3 rooms. Compute paintings per room. | [
"Total: 9.",
"Rooms: 3.",
"9 / 3 = 3."
] | philosophy | Answer: Per room: 3.
Steps:
1. Total: 9.
2. Rooms: 3.
3. 9 / 3 = 3. | aesthetics |
One share: 120. | null | phi_0055 | worked_example | en | Behind the veil, 240 units are split equally among 2 groups. Compute one share. | [
"Total 240.",
"Groups 2.",
"240 / 2 = 120."
] | philosophy | Answer: One share: 120.
Steps:
1. Total 240.
2. Groups 2.
3. 240 / 2 = 120. | ethics |
Reliabilism counts beliefs as knowledge when formed by truth-tracking processes, whether or not reasons are cited. | null | phi_0056 | concept | en | Why reliabilism? | [
"Reliabilism counts beliefs as knowledge when formed by truth-tracking processes, whether or not reasons are cited.",
"So the answer stands: Reliabilism counts beliefs as knowledge when formed by truth-tracking processes, whether or not reasons are cited."
] | philosophy | Answer: Reliabilism counts beliefs as knowledge when formed by truth-tracking processes, whether or not reasons are cited.
Steps:
1. Reliabilism counts beliefs as knowledge when formed by truth-tracking processes, whether or not reasons are cited.
2. So the answer stands: Reliabilism counts beliefs as knowledge when fo... | epistemology |
A syllogism links two premises sharing a middle term to force a conclusion about extremes. | null | phi_0057 | concept | en | What is a syllogism? | [
"A syllogism links two premises sharing a middle term to force a conclusion about extremes.",
"So the answer stands: A syllogism links two premises sharing a middle term to force a conclusion about extremes."
] | philosophy | Answer: A syllogism links two premises sharing a middle term to force a conclusion about extremes.
Steps:
1. A syllogism links two premises sharing a middle term to force a conclusion about extremes.
2. So the answer stands: A syllogism links two premises sharing a middle term to force a conclusion about extremes. | logic |
Explaining why brain activity feels like anything resists functional stories, Chalmers argues. | null | phi_0058 | concept | en | Why the hard problem? | [
"Explaining why brain activity feels like anything resists functional stories, Chalmers argues.",
"So the answer stands: Explaining why brain activity feels like anything resists functional stories, Chalmers argues."
] | philosophy | Answer: Explaining why brain activity feels like anything resists functional stories, Chalmers argues.
Steps:
1. Explaining why brain activity feels like anything resists functional stories, Chalmers argues.
2. So the answer stands: Explaining why brain activity feels like anything resists functional stories, Chalmers ... | mind |
Contract theories ground authority in hypothetical consent, asking what free equals would accept. | null | phi_0059 | concept | en | Why the social contract? | [
"Contract theories ground authority in hypothetical consent, asking what free equals would accept.",
"So the answer stands: Contract theories ground authority in hypothetical consent, asking what free equals would accept."
] | philosophy | Answer: Contract theories ground authority in hypothetical consent, asking what free equals would accept.
Steps:
1. Contract theories ground authority in hypothetical consent, asking what free equals would accept.
2. So the answer stands: Contract theories ground authority in hypothetical consent, asking what free equa... | political_philosophy |
Count: 7. | {
"A": "6",
"B": "8",
"C": "7",
"D": "9"
} | phi_0060 | multiple_choice | en | Of 12 canon works, 5 are music. How many are not music? | [
"Total 12.",
"Minus 5.",
"Left: 7.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 7
Steps:
1. Total 12.
2. Minus 5.
3. Left: 7.
4. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | aesthetics |
Utilitarismus soudí činy podle celkového štěstí, kritici namítají práva a spravedlnost. | null | phi_0061 | concept | cs | Co je utilitarismus? | [
"Utilitarismus soudí činy podle celkového štěstí, kritici namítají práva a spravedlnost.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Utilitarismus soudí činy podle celkového štěstí, kritici namítají práva a spravedlnost."
] | philosophy | Answer: Utilitarismus soudí činy podle celkového štěstí, kritici namítají práva a spravedlnost.
Steps:
1. Utilitarismus soudí činy podle celkového štěstí, kritici namítají práva a spravedlnost.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Utilitarismus soudí činy podle celkového štěstí, kritici namítají práva a spravedlnost. | ethics |
Scepticism doubts that certainty is reachable, pressing claims about dreams, demons, and brains in vats. | null | phi_0062 | concept | en | What is scepticism? | [
"Scepticism doubts that certainty is reachable, pressing claims about dreams, demons, and brains in vats.",
"So the answer stands: Scepticism doubts that certainty is reachable, pressing claims about dreams, demons, and brains in vats."
] | philosophy | Answer: Scepticism doubts that certainty is reachable, pressing claims about dreams, demons, and brains in vats.
Steps:
1. Scepticism doubts that certainty is reachable, pressing claims about dreams, demons, and brains in vats.
2. So the answer stands: Scepticism doubts that certainty is reachable, pressing claims abou... | epistemology |
Count: 7. | {
"A": "5",
"B": "9",
"C": "7",
"D": "11"
} | phi_0063 | multiple_choice | en | A formula has 3 binary connectives. How many subformulas does it have? | [
"Atoms 4.",
"Plus 3 compounds.",
"Total: 7.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 7
Steps:
1. Atoms 4.
2. Plus 3 compounds.
3. Total: 7.
4. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | logic |
Count: 4. | {
"A": "3",
"B": "5",
"C": "4",
"D": "6"
} | phi_0064 | multiple_choice | en | Of 6 conceivability cases, 2 are zombies. How many are not zombies? | [
"Total 6.",
"Minus 2.",
"Left: 4.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 4
Steps:
1. Total 6.
2. Minus 2.
3. Left: 4.
4. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | mind |
Liberty splits into negative freedom from interference and positive power to act meaningfully. | null | phi_0065 | concept | en | What is liberty? | [
"Liberty splits into negative freedom from interference and positive power to act meaningfully.",
"So the answer stands: Liberty splits into negative freedom from interference and positive power to act meaningfully."
] | philosophy | Answer: Liberty splits into negative freedom from interference and positive power to act meaningfully.
Steps:
1. Liberty splits into negative freedom from interference and positive power to act meaningfully.
2. So the answer stands: Liberty splits into negative freedom from interference and positive power to act meanin... | political_philosophy |
Kant called beauty purposeless yet universal, a puzzling blend of feeling and claim. | null | phi_0066 | concept | en | What is aesthetic judgment? | [
"Kant called beauty purposeless yet universal, a puzzling blend of feeling and claim.",
"So the answer stands: Kant called beauty purposeless yet universal, a puzzling blend of feeling and claim."
] | philosophy | Answer: Kant called beauty purposeless yet universal, a puzzling blend of feeling and claim.
Steps:
1. Kant called beauty purposeless yet universal, a puzzling blend of feeling and claim.
2. So the answer stands: Kant called beauty purposeless yet universal, a puzzling blend of feeling and claim. | aesthetics |
It permits foreseen harm only as a side effect of good acts, distinguishing intended means from accidents. | null | phi_0067 | concept | en | What is the doctrine of double effect? | [
"It permits foreseen harm only as a side effect of good acts, distinguishing intended means from accidents.",
"So the answer stands: It permits foreseen harm only as a side effect of good acts, distinguishing intended means from accidents."
] | philosophy | Answer: It permits foreseen harm only as a side effect of good acts, distinguishing intended means from accidents.
Steps:
1. It permits foreseen harm only as a side effect of good acts, distinguishing intended means from accidents.
2. So the answer stands: It permits foreseen harm only as a side effect of good acts, di... | ethics |
Perception links mind to world yet deceives in illusions, raising evidence questions for all senses. | null | phi_0068 | concept | en | Why study perception? | [
"Perception links mind to world yet deceives in illusions, raising evidence questions for all senses.",
"So the answer stands: Perception links mind to world yet deceives in illusions, raising evidence questions for all senses."
] | philosophy | Answer: Perception links mind to world yet deceives in illusions, raising evidence questions for all senses.
Steps:
1. Perception links mind to world yet deceives in illusions, raising evidence questions for all senses.
2. So the answer stands: Perception links mind to world yet deceives in illusions, raising evidence ... | epistemology |
The answer is Validity. | {
"A": "Volume",
"B": "Speed",
"C": "Length",
"D": "Validity"
} | phi_0069 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what guarantees conclusions? | [
"Form forces truth.",
"So: Validity.",
"Select option D."
] | philosophy | Answer: Validity
Steps:
1. Form forces truth.
2. So: Validity.
3. Select option D.
Answer: (D) | logic |
Qualia are the felt qualities of experience, like redness, central to anti-physicalist arguments. | null | phi_0070 | concept | en | What are qualia? | [
"Qualia are the felt qualities of experience, like redness, central to anti-physicalist arguments.",
"So the answer stands: Qualia are the felt qualities of experience, like redness, central to anti-physicalist arguments."
] | philosophy | Answer: Qualia are the felt qualities of experience, like redness, central to anti-physicalist arguments.
Steps:
1. Qualia are the felt qualities of experience, like redness, central to anti-physicalist arguments.
2. So the answer stands: Qualia are the felt qualities of experience, like redness, central to anti-physic... | mind |
Democrats value equal say and error correction, while critics warn of populism and ignorance. | null | phi_0071 | concept | en | Why democracy? | [
"Democrats value equal say and error correction, while critics warn of populism and ignorance.",
"So the answer stands: Democrats value equal say and error correction, while critics warn of populism and ignorance."
] | philosophy | Answer: Democrats value equal say and error correction, while critics warn of populism and ignorance.
Steps:
1. Democrats value equal say and error correction, while critics warn of populism and ignorance.
2. So the answer stands: Democrats value equal say and error correction, while critics warn of populism and ignora... | political_philosophy |
Total: 8. | null | phi_0072 | worked_example | en | A play has 4 acts with 2 scenes each. Count all scenes. | [
"Acts: 4.",
"Each: 2.",
"4 × 2 = 8."
] | philosophy | Answer: Total: 8.
Steps:
1. Acts: 4.
2. Each: 2.
3. 4 × 2 = 8. | aesthetics |
Net lives saved: 2. | {
"A": "1",
"B": "2",
"C": "3",
"D": "4"
} | phi_0073 | multiple_choice | en | A trolley threatens 3 people; diverting saves them all but 1 dies. How many net lives are saved? | [
"Saved 3.",
"Lost 1.",
"Net: 2.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 2
Steps:
1. Saved 3.
2. Lost 1.
3. Net: 2.
4. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | ethics |
Spolehlivost je 70 %. | {
"A": "65 %",
"B": "70 %",
"C": "75 %",
"D": "80 %"
} | phi_0074 | multiple_choice | cs | Proces trefí 70 ze 100 přesvědčení. Jaká je jeho spolehlivost v procentech? | [
"70 ze 100.",
"= 70 %.",
"Vyber možnost B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 70 %
Steps:
1. 70 ze 100.
2. = 70 %.
3. Vyber možnost B.
Answer: (B) | epistemology |
The answer is Quantifiers. | {
"A": "Quantifiers",
"B": "Adjectives",
"C": "Adverbs",
"D": "Pronouns"
} | phi_0075 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what expresses all/some? | [
"Scope made precise.",
"So: Quantifiers.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: Quantifiers
Steps:
1. Scope made precise.
2. So: Quantifiers.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | logic |
Dualismus tvrdí, že mysl a tělo jsou různé druhy. | null | phi_0076 | concept | cs | Co je dualismus? | [
"Dualismus tvrdí, že mysl a tělo jsou různé druhy.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Dualismus tvrdí, že mysl a tělo jsou různé druhy."
] | philosophy | Answer: Dualismus tvrdí, že mysl a tělo jsou různé druhy.
Steps:
1. Dualismus tvrdí, že mysl a tělo jsou různé druhy.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Dualismus tvrdí, že mysl a tělo jsou různé druhy. | mind |
Tax: 130. | null | phi_0077 | worked_example | en | A tax takes 13% of 1000. Compute the tax amount. | [
"13% of 1000.",
"1000×13/100.",
"= 130."
] | philosophy | Answer: Tax: 130.
Steps:
1. 13% of 1000.
2. 1000×13/100.
3. = 130. | political_philosophy |
Count: 7. | null | phi_0078 | worked_example | en | Of 13 canon works, 6 are music. Count the non-music works. | [
"Total: 13.",
"Music: 6.",
"13 − 6 = 7."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 7.
Steps:
1. Total: 13.
2. Music: 6.
3. 13 − 6 = 7. | aesthetics |
Net utility: 10. | null | phi_0079 | worked_example | en | An act gives +10 happiness to 7 people and −20 to 3 people. Compute the net utility. | [
"Gains: 10×7 = 70.",
"Losses: 20×3 = 60.",
"70 − 60 = 10."
] | philosophy | Answer: Net utility: 10.
Steps:
1. Gains: 10×7 = 70.
2. Losses: 20×3 = 60.
3. 70 − 60 = 10. | ethics |
Reliability: 72%. | null | phi_0080 | worked_example | en | A process gets 72 of 100 beliefs right. State its reliability percent. | [
"Right: 72.",
"Of 100.",
"= 72%."
] | philosophy | Answer: Reliability: 72%.
Steps:
1. Right: 72.
2. Of 100.
3. = 72%. | epistemology |
Tabulka má 4 řádky. | {
"A": "4",
"B": "2",
"C": "6",
"D": "8"
} | phi_0081 | multiple_choice | cs | Kolik řádků má pravdivostní tabulka s 2 písmeny? | [
"2^2 řádků.",
"Celkem: 4.",
"Vyber možnost A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 4
Steps:
1. 2^2 řádků.
2. Celkem: 4.
3. Vyber možnost A.
Answer: (A) | logic |
Functionalism defines minds by causal roles, letting silicon and neurons both realize thought. | null | phi_0082 | concept | en | Why functionalism? | [
"Functionalism defines minds by causal roles, letting silicon and neurons both realize thought.",
"So the answer stands: Functionalism defines minds by causal roles, letting silicon and neurons both realize thought."
] | philosophy | Answer: Functionalism defines minds by causal roles, letting silicon and neurons both realize thought.
Steps:
1. Functionalism defines minds by causal roles, letting silicon and neurons both realize thought.
2. So the answer stands: Functionalism defines minds by causal roles, letting silicon and neurons both realize t... | mind |
Legitimacy asks when rule is rightful, answered by consent, fairness, or democratic procedure. | null | phi_0083 | concept | en | What is legitimacy? | [
"Legitimacy asks when rule is rightful, answered by consent, fairness, or democratic procedure.",
"So the answer stands: Legitimacy asks when rule is rightful, answered by consent, fairness, or democratic procedure."
] | philosophy | Answer: Legitimacy asks when rule is rightful, answered by consent, fairness, or democratic procedure.
Steps:
1. Legitimacy asks when rule is rightful, answered by consent, fairness, or democratic procedure.
2. So the answer stands: Legitimacy asks when rule is rightful, answered by consent, fairness, or democratic pro... | political_philosophy |
The answer is Aesthetic judgment. | {
"A": "Hasty verdict",
"B": "Coin toss",
"C": "Blind guess",
"D": "Aesthetic judgment"
} | phi_0084 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what blends feeling, claim? | [
"Kant puzzles beauty.",
"So: Aesthetic judgment.",
"Select option D."
] | philosophy | Answer: Aesthetic judgment
Steps:
1. Kant puzzles beauty.
2. So: Aesthetic judgment.
3. Select option D.
Answer: (D) | aesthetics |
One share is 60. | {
"A": "50",
"B": "70",
"C": "60",
"D": "80"
} | phi_0085 | multiple_choice | en | Behind the veil, 120 units are split equally among 2 groups. What is one share? | [
"Total 120.",
"Divide by 2: 60.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 60
Steps:
1. Total 120.
2. Divide by 2: 60.
3. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | ethics |
Gettier dal případy zdůvodněných pravd ze štěstí a napadl klasickou definici. | null | phi_0086 | concept | cs | Proč Gettierovy problémy? | [
"Gettier dal případy zdůvodněných pravd ze štěstí a napadl klasickou definici.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Gettier dal případy zdůvodněných pravd ze štěstí a napadl klasickou definici."
] | philosophy | Answer: Gettier dal případy zdůvodněných pravd ze štěstí a napadl klasickou definici.
Steps:
1. Gettier dal případy zdůvodněných pravd ze štěstí a napadl klasickou definici.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Gettier dal případy zdůvodněných pravd ze štěstí a napadl klasickou definici. | epistemology |
The table has 8 rows. | {
"A": "6",
"B": "8",
"C": "10",
"D": "12"
} | phi_0087 | multiple_choice | en | How many rows does a truth table with 3 sentence letters have? | [
"2^3 rows.",
"Total: 8.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 8
Steps:
1. 2^3 rows.
2. Total: 8.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | logic |
The answer is Dualism. | {
"A": "Monism",
"B": "Pluralism",
"C": "Nihilism",
"D": "Dualism"
} | phi_0088 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what claims two kinds? | [
"Interaction puzzled.",
"So: Dualism.",
"Select option D."
] | philosophy | Answer: Dualism
Steps:
1. Interaction puzzled.
2. So: Dualism.
3. Select option D.
Answer: (D) | mind |
Většina je 11 hlasů. | {
"A": "11",
"B": "10",
"C": "12",
"D": "13"
} | phi_0089 | multiple_choice | cs | Rada s 20 členy potřebuje většinu. Kolik hlasů to je? | [
"Polovina z 20.",
"Plus 1: 11.",
"Vyber možnost A."
] | philosophy | Answer: 11
Steps:
1. Polovina z 20.
2. Plus 1: 11.
3. Vyber možnost A.
Answer: (A) | political_philosophy |
The answer is Ugly art. | {
"A": "Ugly art",
"B": "Pretty postcards",
"C": "Sweet songs",
"D": "Soft pillows"
} | phi_0090 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what can protest norms? | [
"Beauty not sole aim.",
"So: Ugly art.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: Ugly art
Steps:
1. Beauty not sole aim.
2. So: Ugly art.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | aesthetics |
Net saved: 4. | null | phi_0091 | worked_example | en | A trolley threatens 5 people; diverting saves them all but 1 dies. Compute net lives saved. | [
"Saved: 5.",
"Lost: 1.",
"5 − 1 = 4."
] | philosophy | Answer: Net saved: 4.
Steps:
1. Saved: 5.
2. Lost: 1.
3. 5 − 1 = 4. | ethics |
Count: 3. | {
"A": "2",
"B": "4",
"C": "3",
"D": "5"
} | phi_0092 | multiple_choice | en | Of 5 peer experts, 2 dissent. How many agree? | [
"Total 5.",
"Minus 2.",
"Agree: 3.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 3
Steps:
1. Total 5.
2. Minus 2.
3. Agree: 3.
4. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | epistemology |
Fallacy lists name common bad moves, training thinkers to spot weak reasoning fast. | null | phi_0093 | concept | en | Why study fallacies? | [
"Fallacy lists name common bad moves, training thinkers to spot weak reasoning fast.",
"So the answer stands: Fallacy lists name common bad moves, training thinkers to spot weak reasoning fast."
] | philosophy | Answer: Fallacy lists name common bad moves, training thinkers to spot weak reasoning fast.
Steps:
1. Fallacy lists name common bad moves, training thinkers to spot weak reasoning fast.
2. So the answer stands: Fallacy lists name common bad moves, training thinkers to spot weak reasoning fast. | logic |
Count: 16. | null | phi_0094 | worked_example | en | A thought experiment varies 4 factors with 2 levels each. Count the combinations. | [
"2 levels each.",
"2^4.",
"= 16."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 16.
Steps:
1. 2 levels each.
2. 2^4.
3. = 16. | mind |
Celkem hlasů: 10. | {
"A": "8",
"B": "10",
"C": "12",
"D": "14"
} | phi_0095 | multiple_choice | cs | Federace má 5 států se 2 hlasy. Kolik hlasů celkem? | [
"5 × 2.",
"Celkem: 10.",
"Vyber možnost B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 10
Steps:
1. 5 × 2.
2. Celkem: 10.
3. Vyber možnost B.
Answer: (B) | political_philosophy |
Celkem scén: 6. | {
"A": "4",
"B": "6",
"C": "8",
"D": "10"
} | phi_0096 | multiple_choice | cs | Hra má 3 dějství se 2 scénami. Kolik scén celkem? | [
"3 × 2.",
"Celkem: 6.",
"Vyber možnost B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 6
Steps:
1. 3 × 2.
2. Celkem: 6.
3. Vyber možnost B.
Answer: (B) | aesthetics |
Kantians hold intent fixes moral worth, while consequentialists counter that only results count in the end. | null | phi_0097 | concept | en | Why care about intentions? | [
"Kantians hold intent fixes moral worth, while consequentialists counter that only results count in the end.",
"So the answer stands: Kantians hold intent fixes moral worth, while consequentialists counter that only results count in the end."
] | philosophy | Answer: Kantians hold intent fixes moral worth, while consequentialists counter that only results count in the end.
Steps:
1. Kantians hold intent fixes moral worth, while consequentialists counter that only results count in the end.
2. So the answer stands: Kantians hold intent fixes moral worth, while consequentialis... | ethics |
Testimony is belief from others' words, and its justification divides reductionists from trusting non-reductionists. | null | phi_0098 | concept | en | What is testimony? | [
"Testimony is belief from others' words, and its justification divides reductionists from trusting non-reductionists.",
"So the answer stands: Testimony is belief from others' words, and its justification divides reductionists from trusting non-reductionists."
] | philosophy | Answer: Testimony is belief from others' words, and its justification divides reductionists from trusting non-reductionists.
Steps:
1. Testimony is belief from others' words, and its justification divides reductionists from trusting non-reductionists.
2. So the answer stands: Testimony is belief from others' words, and... | epistemology |
Rows: 16. | null | phi_0099 | worked_example | en | Show the row count of a truth table with 4 sentence letters. | [
"2 values each.",
"2^4.",
"= 16."
] | philosophy | Answer: Rows: 16.
Steps:
1. 2 values each.
2. 2^4.
3. = 16. | logic |
Behaviourism reduces mind talk to dispositions to behave, skipping inner states entirely. | null | phi_0100 | concept | en | What is behaviourism? | [
"Behaviourism reduces mind talk to dispositions to behave, skipping inner states entirely.",
"So the answer stands: Behaviourism reduces mind talk to dispositions to behave, skipping inner states entirely."
] | philosophy | Answer: Behaviourism reduces mind talk to dispositions to behave, skipping inner states entirely.
Steps:
1. Behaviourism reduces mind talk to dispositions to behave, skipping inner states entirely.
2. So the answer stands: Behaviourism reduces mind talk to dispositions to behave, skipping inner states entirely. | mind |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.