answer string | choices dict | id string | kind string | lang string | question string | steps list | subject string | text string | topic string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Většina: 12. | null | phi_0101 | worked_example | cs | Rada s 22 členy potřebuje většinu. Spočítej velikost většiny. | [
"Polovina: 11.",
"Plus 1.",
"= 12."
] | philosophy | Answer: Většina: 12.
Steps:
1. Polovina: 11.
2. Plus 1.
3. = 12. | political_philosophy |
Per room: 4. | null | phi_0102 | worked_example | en | A gallery hangs 12 paintings equally in 3 rooms. Compute paintings per room. | [
"Total: 12.",
"Rooms: 3.",
"12 / 3 = 4."
] | philosophy | Answer: Per room: 4.
Steps:
1. Total: 12.
2. Rooms: 3.
3. 12 / 3 = 4. | aesthetics |
Deontologie soudí činy podle povinností a pravidel, některé činy jsou špatné vždy. | null | phi_0103 | concept | cs | Co je deontologie? | [
"Deontologie soudí činy podle povinností a pravidel, některé činy jsou špatné vždy.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Deontologie soudí činy podle povinností a pravidel, některé činy jsou špatné vždy."
] | philosophy | Answer: Deontologie soudí činy podle povinností a pravidel, některé činy jsou špatné vždy.
Steps:
1. Deontologie soudí činy podle povinností a pravidel, některé činy jsou špatné vždy.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Deontologie soudí činy podle povinností a pravidel, některé činy jsou špatné vždy. | ethics |
Count: 4. | null | phi_0104 | worked_example | en | Of 6 peer experts, 2 dissent. Count those who agree. | [
"Total: 6.",
"Dissent: 2.",
"6 − 2 = 4."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 4.
Steps:
1. Total: 6.
2. Dissent: 2.
3. 6 − 2 = 4. | epistemology |
From not-Q and P-implies-Q it infers not-P, the contrapositive twin of modus ponens. | null | phi_0105 | concept | en | What is modus tollens? | [
"From not-Q and P-implies-Q it infers not-P, the contrapositive twin of modus ponens.",
"So the answer stands: From not-Q and P-implies-Q it infers not-P, the contrapositive twin of modus ponens."
] | philosophy | Answer: From not-Q and P-implies-Q it infers not-P, the contrapositive twin of modus ponens.
Steps:
1. From not-Q and P-implies-Q it infers not-P, the contrapositive twin of modus ponens.
2. So the answer stands: From not-Q and P-implies-Q it infers not-P, the contrapositive twin of modus ponens. | logic |
Count: 5. | null | phi_0106 | worked_example | en | Of 8 conceivability cases, 3 are zombies. Count the non-zombies. | [
"Total: 8.",
"Zombies: 3.",
"8 − 3 = 5."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 5.
Steps:
1. Total: 8.
2. Zombies: 3.
3. 8 − 3 = 5. | mind |
Majority: 14. | null | phi_0107 | worked_example | en | A council of 26 needs a majority. Compute the majority size. | [
"Half: 13.",
"Plus 1.",
"= 14."
] | philosophy | Answer: Majority: 14.
Steps:
1. Half: 13.
2. Plus 1.
3. = 14. | political_philosophy |
The sublime mixes awe with fear before vastness, from mountains to mathematics. | null | phi_0108 | concept | en | Why the sublime? | [
"The sublime mixes awe with fear before vastness, from mountains to mathematics.",
"So the answer stands: The sublime mixes awe with fear before vastness, from mountains to mathematics."
] | philosophy | Answer: The sublime mixes awe with fear before vastness, from mountains to mathematics.
Steps:
1. The sublime mixes awe with fear before vastness, from mountains to mathematics.
2. So the answer stands: The sublime mixes awe with fear before vastness, from mountains to mathematics. | aesthetics |
Relativism ties rightness to culture or agent, while objectivists insist some acts are wrong everywhere. | null | phi_0109 | concept | en | What is moral relativism? | [
"Relativism ties rightness to culture or agent, while objectivists insist some acts are wrong everywhere.",
"So the answer stands: Relativism ties rightness to culture or agent, while objectivists insist some acts are wrong everywhere."
] | philosophy | Answer: Relativism ties rightness to culture or agent, while objectivists insist some acts are wrong everywhere.
Steps:
1. Relativism ties rightness to culture or agent, while objectivists insist some acts are wrong everywhere.
2. So the answer stands: Relativism ties rightness to culture or agent, while objectivists i... | ethics |
Count: 5. | null | phi_0110 | worked_example | en | Of a thinker's beliefs, 16 are justified and 11 are both justified and true. Count the justified-but-false. | [
"Justified: 16.",
"Both: 11.",
"16 − 11 = 5."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 5.
Steps:
1. Justified: 16.
2. Both: 11.
3. 16 − 11 = 5. | epistemology |
Quantifiers express all and some precisely, unlocking logic far beyond simple sentences. | null | phi_0111 | concept | en | Why quantifiers? | [
"Quantifiers express all and some precisely, unlocking logic far beyond simple sentences.",
"So the answer stands: Quantifiers express all and some precisely, unlocking logic far beyond simple sentences."
] | philosophy | Answer: Quantifiers express all and some precisely, unlocking logic far beyond simple sentences.
Steps:
1. Quantifiers express all and some precisely, unlocking logic far beyond simple sentences.
2. So the answer stands: Quantifiers express all and some precisely, unlocking logic far beyond simple sentences. | logic |
The answer is Zombies. | {
"A": "Zombies",
"B": "Ghosts",
"C": "Angels",
"D": "Robots"
} | phi_0112 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what conceives darkness? | [
"Lights out argued.",
"So: Zombies.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: Zombies
Steps:
1. Lights out argued.
2. So: Zombies.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | mind |
Rights shield individuals from majorities, though grounding them divides naturalists and constructivists. | null | phi_0113 | concept | en | Why rights? | [
"Rights shield individuals from majorities, though grounding them divides naturalists and constructivists.",
"So the answer stands: Rights shield individuals from majorities, though grounding them divides naturalists and constructivists."
] | philosophy | Answer: Rights shield individuals from majorities, though grounding them divides naturalists and constructivists.
Steps:
1. Rights shield individuals from majorities, though grounding them divides naturalists and constructivists.
2. So the answer stands: Rights shield individuals from majorities, though grounding them ... | political_philosophy |
Count: 3. | {
"A": "2",
"B": "3",
"C": "4",
"D": "5"
} | phi_0114 | multiple_choice | en | A gallery hangs 9 paintings equally in 3 rooms. How many per room? | [
"9 / 3.",
"Per room: 3.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 3
Steps:
1. 9 / 3.
2. Per room: 3.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | aesthetics |
One share: 120. | null | phi_0115 | worked_example | en | Behind the veil, 360 units are split equally among 3 groups. Compute one share. | [
"Total 360.",
"Groups 3.",
"360 / 3 = 120."
] | philosophy | Answer: One share: 120.
Steps:
1. Total 360.
2. Groups 3.
3. 360 / 3 = 120. | ethics |
When equals disagree, some split the difference while steadfast views hold one's ground rationally. | null | phi_0116 | concept | en | Why peer disagreement? | [
"When equals disagree, some split the difference while steadfast views hold one's ground rationally.",
"So the answer stands: When equals disagree, some split the difference while steadfast views hold one's ground rationally."
] | philosophy | Answer: When equals disagree, some split the difference while steadfast views hold one's ground rationally.
Steps:
1. When equals disagree, some split the difference while steadfast views hold one's ground rationally.
2. So the answer stands: When equals disagree, some split the difference while steadfast views hold on... | epistemology |
Počet: 3. | null | phi_0117 | worked_example | cs | Z 9 forem úsudku je 6 platných. Spočítej neplatné. | [
"Celkem: 9.",
"Platných: 6.",
"9 − 6 = 3."
] | philosophy | Answer: Počet: 3.
Steps:
1. Celkem: 9.
2. Platných: 6.
3. 9 − 6 = 3. | logic |
Eliminativists claim folk mental concepts are false theories that neuroscience will replace. | null | phi_0118 | concept | en | Why eliminativism? | [
"Eliminativists claim folk mental concepts are false theories that neuroscience will replace.",
"So the answer stands: Eliminativists claim folk mental concepts are false theories that neuroscience will replace."
] | philosophy | Answer: Eliminativists claim folk mental concepts are false theories that neuroscience will replace.
Steps:
1. Eliminativists claim folk mental concepts are false theories that neuroscience will replace.
2. So the answer stands: Eliminativists claim folk mental concepts are false theories that neuroscience will replace... | mind |
Total: 16. | null | phi_0119 | worked_example | en | A federation has 8 states with 2 votes each. Count all votes. | [
"States: 8.",
"Each: 2.",
"8 × 2 = 16."
] | philosophy | Answer: Total: 16.
Steps:
1. States: 8.
2. Each: 2.
3. 8 × 2 = 16. | political_philosophy |
Taste names discriminating perception trained by exposure, though relativists deny expertise. | null | phi_0120 | concept | en | What is taste? | [
"Taste names discriminating perception trained by exposure, though relativists deny expertise.",
"So the answer stands: Taste names discriminating perception trained by exposure, though relativists deny expertise."
] | philosophy | Answer: Taste names discriminating perception trained by exposure, though relativists deny expertise.
Steps:
1. Taste names discriminating perception trained by exposure, though relativists deny expertise.
2. So the answer stands: Taste names discriminating perception trained by exposure, though relativists deny expert... | aesthetics |
Metaethics asks what moral claims mean, whether truth exists there, and how moral language works. | null | phi_0121 | concept | en | Why study metaethics? | [
"Metaethics asks what moral claims mean, whether truth exists there, and how moral language works.",
"So the answer stands: Metaethics asks what moral claims mean, whether truth exists there, and how moral language works."
] | philosophy | Answer: Metaethics asks what moral claims mean, whether truth exists there, and how moral language works.
Steps:
1. Metaethics asks what moral claims mean, whether truth exists there, and how moral language works.
2. So the answer stands: Metaethics asks what moral claims mean, whether truth exists there, and how moral... | ethics |
Reliability: 77%. | null | phi_0122 | worked_example | en | A process gets 77 of 100 beliefs right. State its reliability percent. | [
"Right: 77.",
"Of 100.",
"= 77%."
] | philosophy | Answer: Reliability: 77%.
Steps:
1. Right: 77.
2. Of 100.
3. = 77%. | epistemology |
Počet: 3. | {
"A": "2",
"B": "3",
"C": "4",
"D": "5"
} | phi_0123 | multiple_choice | cs | Z 8 forem úsudku je 5 platných. Kolik je neplatných? | [
"Celkem 8.",
"Minus platné 5.",
"Neplatných: 3.",
"Vyber možnost B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 3
Steps:
1. Celkem 8.
2. Minus platné 5.
3. Neplatných: 3.
4. Vyber možnost B.
Answer: (B) | logic |
Počet: 9. | null | phi_0124 | worked_example | cs | Funkční systém má 3 vstupy a 3 výstupy. Spočítej dvojice. | [
"Vstupy: 3.",
"Výstupy: 3.",
"3 × 3 = 9."
] | philosophy | Answer: Počet: 9.
Steps:
1. Vstupy: 3.
2. Výstupy: 3.
3. 3 × 3 = 9. | mind |
Tax: 140. | null | phi_0125 | worked_example | en | A tax takes 14% of 1000. Compute the tax amount. | [
"14% of 1000.",
"1000×14/100.",
"= 140."
] | philosophy | Answer: Tax: 140.
Steps:
1. 14% of 1000.
2. 1000×14/100.
3. = 140. | political_philosophy |
Total scenes: 8. | {
"A": "6",
"B": "10",
"C": "8",
"D": "12"
} | phi_0126 | multiple_choice | en | A play has 4 acts with 2 scenes each. How many scenes total? | [
"4 × 2.",
"Total: 8.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 8
Steps:
1. 4 × 2.
2. Total: 8.
3. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | aesthetics |
The answer is Utilitarianism. | {
"A": "Deontology",
"B": "Virtue ethics",
"C": "Nihilism",
"D": "Utilitarianism"
} | phi_0127 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what judges by totals? | [
"Happiness sums decide.",
"So: Utilitarianism.",
"Select option D."
] | philosophy | Answer: Utilitarianism
Steps:
1. Happiness sums decide.
2. So: Utilitarianism.
3. Select option D.
Answer: (D) | ethics |
The answer is Justified true belief. | {
"A": "Loud firm guess",
"B": "Old fast habit",
"C": "Bold blind leap",
"D": "Justified true belief"
} | phi_0128 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what triad defines knowledge? | [
"Gettier strains it.",
"So: Justified true belief.",
"Select option D."
] | philosophy | Answer: Justified true belief
Steps:
1. Gettier strains it.
2. So: Justified true belief.
3. Select option D.
Answer: (D) | epistemology |
Count: 4. | null | phi_0129 | worked_example | en | Of 11 argument forms, 7 are valid. Count the invalid ones. | [
"Total: 11.",
"Valid: 7.",
"11 − 7 = 4."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 4.
Steps:
1. Total: 11.
2. Valid: 7.
3. 11 − 7 = 4. | logic |
Count: 15. | null | phi_0130 | worked_example | en | A functional system has 5 inputs and 3 outputs. Count the pairs. | [
"Inputs: 5.",
"Outputs: 3.",
"5 × 3 = 15."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 15.
Steps:
1. Inputs: 5.
2. Outputs: 3.
3. 5 × 3 = 15. | mind |
The tax is 100. | {
"A": "90",
"B": "110",
"C": "100",
"D": "120"
} | phi_0131 | multiple_choice | en | A tax takes 10% of 1000. How much is the tax? | [
"10% of 1000.",
"Tax: 100.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 100
Steps:
1. 10% of 1000.
2. Tax: 100.
3. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | political_philosophy |
Total: 10. | null | phi_0132 | worked_example | en | A play has 5 acts with 2 scenes each. Count all scenes. | [
"Acts: 5.",
"Each: 2.",
"5 × 2 = 10."
] | philosophy | Answer: Total: 10.
Steps:
1. Acts: 5.
2. Each: 2.
3. 5 × 2 = 10. | aesthetics |
Net utility: 0. | null | phi_0133 | worked_example | en | An act gives +10 happiness to 8 people and −20 to 4 people. Compute the net utility. | [
"Gains: 10×8 = 80.",
"Losses: 20×4 = 80.",
"80 − 80 = 0."
] | philosophy | Answer: Net utility: 0.
Steps:
1. Gains: 10×8 = 80.
2. Losses: 20×4 = 80.
3. 80 − 80 = 0. | ethics |
The answer is Bayesianism. | {
"A": "Bayesianism",
"B": "Stoicism",
"C": "Epicureanism",
"D": "Cynicism"
} | phi_0134 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what updates by rule? | [
"Priors meet evidence.",
"So: Bayesianism.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: Bayesianism
Steps:
1. Priors meet evidence.
2. So: Bayesianism.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | epistemology |
Paradoxes derive absurdity from plausible premises, forcing revisions of trusted principles. | null | phi_0135 | concept | en | What is a paradox? | [
"Paradoxes derive absurdity from plausible premises, forcing revisions of trusted principles.",
"So the answer stands: Paradoxes derive absurdity from plausible premises, forcing revisions of trusted principles."
] | philosophy | Answer: Paradoxes derive absurdity from plausible premises, forcing revisions of trusted principles.
Steps:
1. Paradoxes derive absurdity from plausible premises, forcing revisions of trusted principles.
2. So the answer stands: Paradoxes derive absurdity from plausible premises, forcing revisions of trusted principles... | logic |
Searle imagines rule-following without understanding, arguing syntax alone never yields semantics. | null | phi_0136 | concept | en | What is the Chinese room? | [
"Searle imagines rule-following without understanding, arguing syntax alone never yields semantics.",
"So the answer stands: Searle imagines rule-following without understanding, arguing syntax alone never yields semantics."
] | philosophy | Answer: Searle imagines rule-following without understanding, arguing syntax alone never yields semantics.
Steps:
1. Searle imagines rule-following without understanding, arguing syntax alone never yields semantics.
2. So the answer stands: Searle imagines rule-following without understanding, arguing syntax alone neve... | mind |
Mill permits coercion only to prevent harm to others, defending wide personal liberty. | null | phi_0137 | concept | en | What is the harm principle? | [
"Mill permits coercion only to prevent harm to others, defending wide personal liberty.",
"So the answer stands: Mill permits coercion only to prevent harm to others, defending wide personal liberty."
] | philosophy | Answer: Mill permits coercion only to prevent harm to others, defending wide personal liberty.
Steps:
1. Mill permits coercion only to prevent harm to others, defending wide personal liberty.
2. So the answer stands: Mill permits coercion only to prevent harm to others, defending wide personal liberty. | political_philosophy |
The paradox of fiction asks why unreal events stir real tears and fears. | null | phi_0138 | concept | en | Why fiction moves us? | [
"The paradox of fiction asks why unreal events stir real tears and fears.",
"So the answer stands: The paradox of fiction asks why unreal events stir real tears and fears."
] | philosophy | Answer: The paradox of fiction asks why unreal events stir real tears and fears.
Steps:
1. The paradox of fiction asks why unreal events stir real tears and fears.
2. So the answer stands: The paradox of fiction asks why unreal events stir real tears and fears. | aesthetics |
Net saved: 5. | null | phi_0139 | worked_example | en | A trolley threatens 6 people; diverting saves them all but 1 dies. Compute net lives saved. | [
"Saved: 6.",
"Lost: 1.",
"6 − 1 = 5."
] | philosophy | Answer: Net saved: 5.
Steps:
1. Saved: 6.
2. Lost: 1.
3. 6 − 1 = 5. | ethics |
Count: 4. | null | phi_0140 | worked_example | en | Of 7 peer experts, 3 dissent. Count those who agree. | [
"Total: 7.",
"Dissent: 3.",
"7 − 3 = 4."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 4.
Steps:
1. Total: 7.
2. Dissent: 3.
3. 7 − 3 = 4. | epistemology |
Úsudek je platný, když pravdivé předpoklady zaručují pravdivý závěr. | null | phi_0141 | concept | cs | Co je platnost úsudku? | [
"Úsudek je platný, když pravdivé předpoklady zaručují pravdivý závěr.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Úsudek je platný, když pravdivé předpoklady zaručují pravdivý závěr."
] | philosophy | Answer: Úsudek je platný, když pravdivé předpoklady zaručují pravdivý závěr.
Steps:
1. Úsudek je platný, když pravdivé předpoklady zaručují pravdivý závěr.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Úsudek je platný, když pravdivé předpoklady zaručují pravdivý závěr. | logic |
Count: 32. | null | phi_0142 | worked_example | en | A thought experiment varies 5 factors with 2 levels each. Count the combinations. | [
"2 levels each.",
"2^5.",
"= 32."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 32.
Steps:
1. 2 levels each.
2. 2^5.
3. = 32. | mind |
Egalitarians favour equal or prioritarian shares, while libertarians stress entitlement and exchange. | null | phi_0143 | concept | en | Why distributive shares? | [
"Egalitarians favour equal or prioritarian shares, while libertarians stress entitlement and exchange.",
"So the answer stands: Egalitarians favour equal or prioritarian shares, while libertarians stress entitlement and exchange."
] | philosophy | Answer: Egalitarians favour equal or prioritarian shares, while libertarians stress entitlement and exchange.
Steps:
1. Egalitarians favour equal or prioritarian shares, while libertarians stress entitlement and exchange.
2. So the answer stands: Egalitarians favour equal or prioritarian shares, while libertarians stre... | political_philosophy |
Count: 8. | null | phi_0144 | worked_example | en | Of 15 canon works, 7 are music. Count the non-music works. | [
"Total: 15.",
"Music: 7.",
"15 − 7 = 8."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 8.
Steps:
1. Total: 15.
2. Music: 7.
3. 15 − 7 = 8. | aesthetics |
Čistě zachráněno: 3 životy. | null | phi_0145 | worked_example | cs | Trolejbus ohrožuje 4 lidi; odklon je zachrání, ale 1 zemře. Spočítej čistě zachráněné životy. | [
"Zachráněno: 4.",
"Ztracen: 1.",
"4 − 1 = 3."
] | philosophy | Answer: Čistě zachráněno: 3 životy.
Steps:
1. Zachráněno: 4.
2. Ztracen: 1.
3. 4 − 1 = 3. | ethics |
Count: 5. | {
"A": "4",
"B": "5",
"C": "6",
"D": "7"
} | phi_0146 | multiple_choice | en | Of a thinker's beliefs, 15 are justified and 10 are both justified and true. How many are justified but false? | [
"Justified 15.",
"Minus both 10.",
"Left: 5.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 5
Steps:
1. Justified 15.
2. Minus both 10.
3. Left: 5.
4. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | epistemology |
Count: 11. | null | phi_0147 | worked_example | en | A formula has 5 binary connectives. Count its subformulas. | [
"Atoms: 6.",
"Compounds: 5.",
"6 + 5 = 11."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 11.
Steps:
1. Atoms: 6.
2. Compounds: 5.
3. 6 + 5 = 11. | logic |
Zombies conceivable without consciousness would refute physicalism, though many deny the premise. | null | phi_0148 | concept | en | Why zombies? | [
"Zombies conceivable without consciousness would refute physicalism, though many deny the premise.",
"So the answer stands: Zombies conceivable without consciousness would refute physicalism, though many deny the premise."
] | philosophy | Answer: Zombies conceivable without consciousness would refute physicalism, though many deny the premise.
Steps:
1. Zombies conceivable without consciousness would refute physicalism, though many deny the premise.
2. So the answer stands: Zombies conceivable without consciousness would refute physicalism, though many d... | mind |
The answer is Social contract. | {
"A": "Social ladder",
"B": "Social media",
"C": "Social club",
"D": "Social contract"
} | phi_0149 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what grounds in consent? | [
"Free equals imagine.",
"So: Social contract.",
"Select option D."
] | philosophy | Answer: Social contract
Steps:
1. Free equals imagine.
2. So: Social contract.
3. Select option D.
Answer: (D) | political_philosophy |
Kant nazval krásu bezúčelnou a přesto obecnou. | null | phi_0150 | concept | cs | Co je estetický soud? | [
"Kant nazval krásu bezúčelnou a přesto obecnou.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Kant nazval krásu bezúčelnou a přesto obecnou."
] | philosophy | Answer: Kant nazval krásu bezúčelnou a přesto obecnou.
Steps:
1. Kant nazval krásu bezúčelnou a přesto obecnou.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Kant nazval krásu bezúčelnou a přesto obecnou. | aesthetics |
Rawls hides one's place to pick fair rules, arguing fairness emerges from impartial choice. | null | phi_0151 | concept | en | What is the veil of ignorance? | [
"Rawls hides one's place to pick fair rules, arguing fairness emerges from impartial choice.",
"So the answer stands: Rawls hides one's place to pick fair rules, arguing fairness emerges from impartial choice."
] | philosophy | Answer: Rawls hides one's place to pick fair rules, arguing fairness emerges from impartial choice.
Steps:
1. Rawls hides one's place to pick fair rules, arguing fairness emerges from impartial choice.
2. So the answer stands: Rawls hides one's place to pick fair rules, arguing fairness emerges from impartial choice. | ethics |
Count: 6. | null | phi_0152 | worked_example | en | Of a thinker's beliefs, 19 are justified and 13 are both justified and true. Count the justified-but-false. | [
"Justified: 19.",
"Both: 13.",
"19 − 13 = 6."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 6.
Steps:
1. Justified: 19.
2. Both: 13.
3. 19 − 13 = 6. | epistemology |
Count: 4. | {
"A": "3",
"B": "5",
"C": "4",
"D": "6"
} | phi_0153 | multiple_choice | en | Of 10 argument forms, 6 are valid. How many are invalid? | [
"Total 10.",
"Minus valid 6.",
"Invalid: 4.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 4
Steps:
1. Total 10.
2. Minus valid 6.
3. Invalid: 4.
4. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | logic |
Count: 9. | {
"A": "6",
"B": "9",
"C": "12",
"D": "15"
} | phi_0154 | multiple_choice | en | A functional system has 3 inputs and 3 outputs. How many input-output pairs? | [
"3 × 3.",
"Pairs: 9.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 9
Steps:
1. 3 × 3.
2. Pairs: 9.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | mind |
Teorie zakládají autoritu na hypotetickém souhlasu rovných. | null | phi_0155 | concept | cs | Proč společenská smlouva? | [
"Teorie zakládají autoritu na hypotetickém souhlasu rovných.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Teorie zakládají autoritu na hypotetickém souhlasu rovných."
] | philosophy | Answer: Teorie zakládají autoritu na hypotetickém souhlasu rovných.
Steps:
1. Teorie zakládají autoritu na hypotetickém souhlasu rovných.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Teorie zakládají autoritu na hypotetickém souhlasu rovných. | political_philosophy |
Celkem: 8. | null | phi_0156 | worked_example | cs | Hra má 4 dějství se 2 scénami. Spočítej všechny scény. | [
"Dějství: 4.",
"Každé: 2.",
"4 × 2 = 8."
] | philosophy | Answer: Celkem: 8.
Steps:
1. Dějství: 4.
2. Každé: 2.
3. 4 × 2 = 8. | aesthetics |
One share: 120. | null | phi_0157 | worked_example | en | Behind the veil, 480 units are split equally among 4 groups. Compute one share. | [
"Total 480.",
"Groups 4.",
"480 / 4 = 120."
] | philosophy | Answer: One share: 120.
Steps:
1. Total 480.
2. Groups 4.
3. 480 / 4 = 120. | ethics |
Počet: 4. | null | phi_0158 | worked_example | cs | Z přesvědčení myslitele je 13 zdůvodněných a 9 zdůvodněných i pravdivých. Spočítej zdůvodněné, ale nepravdivé. | [
"Zdůvodněných: 13.",
"Obojí: 9.",
"13 − 9 = 4."
] | philosophy | Answer: Počet: 4.
Steps:
1. Zdůvodněných: 13.
2. Obojí: 9.
3. 13 − 9 = 4. | epistemology |
Count: 9. | {
"A": "7",
"B": "11",
"C": "13",
"D": "9"
} | phi_0159 | multiple_choice | en | A formula has 4 binary connectives. How many subformulas does it have? | [
"Atoms 5.",
"Plus 4 compounds.",
"Total: 9.",
"Select option D."
] | philosophy | Answer: 9
Steps:
1. Atoms 5.
2. Plus 4 compounds.
3. Total: 9.
4. Select option D.
Answer: (D) | logic |
Panpsychism grants experience to all matter, dissolving emergence at the cost of extravagance. | null | phi_0160 | concept | en | What is panpsychism? | [
"Panpsychism grants experience to all matter, dissolving emergence at the cost of extravagance.",
"So the answer stands: Panpsychism grants experience to all matter, dissolving emergence at the cost of extravagance."
] | philosophy | Answer: Panpsychism grants experience to all matter, dissolving emergence at the cost of extravagance.
Steps:
1. Panpsychism grants experience to all matter, dissolving emergence at the cost of extravagance.
2. So the answer stands: Panpsychism grants experience to all matter, dissolving emergence at the cost of extrav... | mind |
Rawls permits inequality only when it aids the worst off, a controversial fairness rule. | null | phi_0161 | concept | en | What is the difference principle? | [
"Rawls permits inequality only when it aids the worst off, a controversial fairness rule.",
"So the answer stands: Rawls permits inequality only when it aids the worst off, a controversial fairness rule."
] | philosophy | Answer: Rawls permits inequality only when it aids the worst off, a controversial fairness rule.
Steps:
1. Rawls permits inequality only when it aids the worst off, a controversial fairness rule.
2. So the answer stands: Rawls permits inequality only when it aids the worst off, a controversial fairness rule. | political_philosophy |
Count: 8. | {
"A": "7",
"B": "9",
"C": "10",
"D": "8"
} | phi_0162 | multiple_choice | en | Of 14 canon works, 6 are music. How many are not music? | [
"Total 14.",
"Minus 6.",
"Left: 8.",
"Select option D."
] | philosophy | Answer: 8
Steps:
1. Total 14.
2. Minus 6.
3. Left: 8.
4. Select option D.
Answer: (D) | aesthetics |
The answer is Double effect. | {
"A": "Double effect",
"B": "Single motive",
"C": "Blind luck",
"D": "Pure chance"
} | phi_0163 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what permits side-effect harm? | [
"Intent versus accident.",
"So: Double effect.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: Double effect
Steps:
1. Intent versus accident.
2. So: Double effect.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | ethics |
Bayesianism updates credences by evidence via Bayes' rule, modelling rational learning numerically. | null | phi_0164 | concept | en | What is Bayesianism? | [
"Bayesianism updates credences by evidence via Bayes' rule, modelling rational learning numerically.",
"So the answer stands: Bayesianism updates credences by evidence via Bayes' rule, modelling rational learning numerically."
] | philosophy | Answer: Bayesianism updates credences by evidence via Bayes' rule, modelling rational learning numerically.
Steps:
1. Bayesianism updates credences by evidence via Bayes' rule, modelling rational learning numerically.
2. So the answer stands: Bayesianism updates credences by evidence via Bayes' rule, modelling rational... | epistemology |
Počet: 7. | {
"A": "5",
"B": "9",
"C": "7",
"D": "11"
} | phi_0165 | multiple_choice | cs | Formule má 3 binárních spojek. Kolik má podformulí? | [
"Atomy 4.",
"Plus 3 složených.",
"Celkem: 7.",
"Vyber možnost C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 7
Steps:
1. Atomy 4.
2. Plus 3 složených.
3. Celkem: 7.
4. Vyber možnost C.
Answer: (C) | logic |
Count: 5. | null | phi_0166 | worked_example | en | Of 9 conceivability cases, 4 are zombies. Count the non-zombies. | [
"Total: 9.",
"Zombies: 4.",
"9 − 4 = 5."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 5.
Steps:
1. Total: 9.
2. Zombies: 4.
3. 9 − 4 = 5. | mind |
Nationalists prize shared culture as political glue, while cosmopolitans stress universal humanity. | null | phi_0167 | concept | en | Why nationalism? | [
"Nationalists prize shared culture as political glue, while cosmopolitans stress universal humanity.",
"So the answer stands: Nationalists prize shared culture as political glue, while cosmopolitans stress universal humanity."
] | philosophy | Answer: Nationalists prize shared culture as political glue, while cosmopolitans stress universal humanity.
Steps:
1. Nationalists prize shared culture as political glue, while cosmopolitans stress universal humanity.
2. So the answer stands: Nationalists prize shared culture as political glue, while cosmopolitans stre... | political_philosophy |
Per room: 5. | null | phi_0168 | worked_example | en | A gallery hangs 15 paintings equally in 3 rooms. Compute paintings per room. | [
"Total: 15.",
"Rooms: 3.",
"15 / 3 = 5."
] | philosophy | Answer: Per room: 5.
Steps:
1. Total: 15.
2. Rooms: 3.
3. 15 / 3 = 5. | aesthetics |
Net utility: 50. | null | phi_0169 | worked_example | en | An act gives +10 happiness to 9 people and −20 to 2 people. Compute the net utility. | [
"Gains: 10×9 = 90.",
"Losses: 20×2 = 40.",
"90 − 40 = 50."
] | philosophy | Answer: Net utility: 50.
Steps:
1. Gains: 10×9 = 90.
2. Losses: 20×2 = 40.
3. 90 − 40 = 50. | ethics |
Reliability: 82%. | null | phi_0170 | worked_example | en | A process gets 82 of 100 beliefs right. State its reliability percent. | [
"Right: 82.",
"Of 100.",
"= 82%."
] | philosophy | Answer: Reliability: 82%.
Steps:
1. Right: 82.
2. Of 100.
3. = 82%. | epistemology |
This sentence is false creates a truth loop, challenging simple theories of truth. | null | phi_0171 | concept | en | Why the liar paradox? | [
"This sentence is false creates a truth loop, challenging simple theories of truth.",
"So the answer stands: This sentence is false creates a truth loop, challenging simple theories of truth."
] | philosophy | Answer: This sentence is false creates a truth loop, challenging simple theories of truth.
Steps:
1. This sentence is false creates a truth loop, challenging simple theories of truth.
2. So the answer stands: This sentence is false creates a truth loop, challenging simple theories of truth. | logic |
Count: 18. | null | phi_0172 | worked_example | en | A functional system has 6 inputs and 3 outputs. Count the pairs. | [
"Inputs: 6.",
"Outputs: 3.",
"6 × 3 = 18."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 18.
Steps:
1. Inputs: 6.
2. Outputs: 3.
3. 6 × 3 = 18. | mind |
Majority: 15. | null | phi_0173 | worked_example | en | A council of 28 needs a majority. Compute the majority size. | [
"Half: 14.",
"Plus 1.",
"= 15."
] | philosophy | Answer: Majority: 15.
Steps:
1. Half: 14.
2. Plus 1.
3. = 15. | political_philosophy |
The answer is The sublime. | {
"A": "The sublime",
"B": "The mundane",
"C": "The trivial",
"D": "The boring"
} | phi_0174 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what mixes awe, fear? | [
"Vastness faced.",
"So: The sublime.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: The sublime
Steps:
1. Vastness faced.
2. So: The sublime.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | aesthetics |
Net utility is 0. | {
"A": "-10",
"B": "0",
"C": "10",
"D": "20"
} | phi_0175 | multiple_choice | en | An act gives +10 happiness to 6 people and −20 to 3 people. What is the net utility? | [
"Gains 60.",
"Losses 60.",
"Net: 0.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 0
Steps:
1. Gains 60.
2. Losses 60.
3. Net: 0.
4. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | ethics |
Reliability is 75%. | {
"A": "70%",
"B": "80%",
"C": "75%",
"D": "85%"
} | phi_0176 | multiple_choice | en | A process gets 75 of 100 beliefs right. What is its reliability percent? | [
"75 of 100.",
"= 75%.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 75%
Steps:
1. 75 of 100.
2. = 75%.
3. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | epistemology |
The answer is Soundness. | {
"A": "Soundness",
"B": "Loudness",
"C": "Brightness",
"D": "Sweetness"
} | phi_0177 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what adds true premises? | [
"Strongest support.",
"So: Soundness.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: Soundness
Steps:
1. Strongest support.
2. So: Soundness.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | logic |
Fyzikalismus tvrdí, že vše mentální je nakonec fyzické. | null | phi_0178 | concept | cs | Co je fyzikalismus? | [
"Fyzikalismus tvrdí, že vše mentální je nakonec fyzické.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Fyzikalismus tvrdí, že vše mentální je nakonec fyzické."
] | philosophy | Answer: Fyzikalismus tvrdí, že vše mentální je nakonec fyzické.
Steps:
1. Fyzikalismus tvrdí, že vše mentální je nakonec fyzické.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Fyzikalismus tvrdí, že vše mentální je nakonec fyzické. | mind |
Celkem: 12. | null | phi_0179 | worked_example | cs | Federace má 6 států se 2 hlasy. Spočítej všechny hlasy. | [
"Států: 6.",
"Každý: 2.",
"6 × 2 = 12."
] | philosophy | Answer: Celkem: 12.
Steps:
1. Států: 6.
2. Každý: 2.
3. 6 × 2 = 12. | political_philosophy |
Depiction theories explain how flat marks show depth, via resemblance or make-believe games. | null | phi_0180 | concept | en | What is depiction? | [
"Depiction theories explain how flat marks show depth, via resemblance or make-believe games.",
"So the answer stands: Depiction theories explain how flat marks show depth, via resemblance or make-believe games."
] | philosophy | Answer: Depiction theories explain how flat marks show depth, via resemblance or make-believe games.
Steps:
1. Depiction theories explain how flat marks show depth, via resemblance or make-believe games.
2. So the answer stands: Depiction theories explain how flat marks show depth, via resemblance or make-believe games... | aesthetics |
Etika ctností se ptá, co by udělal dobrý člověk, a zaměřuje se na charakter. | null | phi_0181 | concept | cs | Co je etika ctností? | [
"Etika ctností se ptá, co by udělal dobrý člověk, a zaměřuje se na charakter.",
"Odpověď tedy platí: Etika ctností se ptá, co by udělal dobrý člověk, a zaměřuje se na charakter."
] | philosophy | Answer: Etika ctností se ptá, co by udělal dobrý člověk, a zaměřuje se na charakter.
Steps:
1. Etika ctností se ptá, co by udělal dobrý člověk, a zaměřuje se na charakter.
2. Odpověď tedy platí: Etika ctností se ptá, co by udělal dobrý člověk, a zaměřuje se na charakter. | ethics |
Count: 4. | null | phi_0182 | worked_example | en | Of 8 peer experts, 4 dissent. Count those who agree. | [
"Total: 8.",
"Dissent: 4.",
"8 − 4 = 4."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 4.
Steps:
1. Total: 8.
2. Dissent: 4.
3. 8 − 4 = 4. | epistemology |
The answer is Liar paradox. | {
"A": "Honest tale",
"B": "Liar paradox",
"C": "Plain fact",
"D": "Calm story"
} | phi_0183 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what loops truth? | [
"This sentence is false.",
"So: Liar paradox.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: Liar paradox
Steps:
1. This sentence is false.
2. So: Liar paradox.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | logic |
Počet: 8. | null | phi_0184 | worked_example | cs | Myšlenkový experiment mění 3 faktory se 2 úrovněmi. Spočítej kombinace. | [
"2 úrovně každé.",
"2^3.",
"= 8."
] | philosophy | Answer: Počet: 8.
Steps:
1. 2 úrovně každé.
2. 2^3.
3. = 8. | mind |
The answer is Cosmopolitanism. | {
"A": "Cosmopolitanism",
"B": "Nationalism",
"C": "Regionalism",
"D": "Localism"
} | phi_0185 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what crosses borders? | [
"Humans first.",
"So: Cosmopolitanism.",
"Select option A."
] | philosophy | Answer: Cosmopolitanism
Steps:
1. Humans first.
2. So: Cosmopolitanism.
3. Select option A.
Answer: (A) | political_philosophy |
The answer is Interpretation. | {
"A": "Interpolation",
"B": "Interpretation",
"C": "Intermission",
"D": "Interjection"
} | phi_0186 | multiple_choice | en | Choose: what debates intent? | [
"Author versus reader.",
"So: Interpretation.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: Interpretation
Steps:
1. Author versus reader.
2. So: Interpretation.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | aesthetics |
Net lives saved: 3. | {
"A": "2",
"B": "4",
"C": "3",
"D": "5"
} | phi_0187 | multiple_choice | en | A trolley threatens 4 people; diverting saves them all but 1 dies. How many net lives are saved? | [
"Saved 4.",
"Lost 1.",
"Net: 3.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 3
Steps:
1. Saved 4.
2. Lost 1.
3. Net: 3.
4. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | ethics |
Count: 7. | null | phi_0188 | worked_example | en | Of a thinker's beliefs, 22 are justified and 15 are both justified and true. Count the justified-but-false. | [
"Justified: 22.",
"Both: 15.",
"22 − 15 = 7."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 7.
Steps:
1. Justified: 22.
2. Both: 15.
3. 22 − 15 = 7. | epistemology |
Rows: 32. | null | phi_0189 | worked_example | en | Show the row count of a truth table with 5 sentence letters. | [
"2 values each.",
"2^5.",
"= 32."
] | philosophy | Answer: Rows: 32.
Steps:
1. 2 values each.
2. 2^5.
3. = 32. | logic |
Počet: 4. | {
"A": "2",
"B": "4",
"C": "6",
"D": "8"
} | phi_0190 | multiple_choice | cs | Myšlenkový experiment mění 2 faktory se 2 úrovněmi. Kolik je kombinací? | [
"2^2.",
"Celkem: 4.",
"Vyber možnost B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 4
Steps:
1. 2^2.
2. Celkem: 4.
3. Vyber možnost B.
Answer: (B) | mind |
Total: 18. | null | phi_0191 | worked_example | en | A federation has 9 states with 2 votes each. Count all votes. | [
"States: 9.",
"Each: 2.",
"9 × 2 = 18."
] | philosophy | Answer: Total: 18.
Steps:
1. States: 9.
2. Each: 2.
3. 9 × 2 = 18. | political_philosophy |
Music moves without words, and theories cite expression, arousal, or pure form. | null | phi_0192 | concept | en | Why music matters? | [
"Music moves without words, and theories cite expression, arousal, or pure form.",
"So the answer stands: Music moves without words, and theories cite expression, arousal, or pure form."
] | philosophy | Answer: Music moves without words, and theories cite expression, arousal, or pure form.
Steps:
1. Music moves without words, and theories cite expression, arousal, or pure form.
2. So the answer stands: Music moves without words, and theories cite expression, arousal, or pure form. | aesthetics |
One share is 80. | {
"A": "70",
"B": "90",
"C": "100",
"D": "80"
} | phi_0193 | multiple_choice | en | Behind the veil, 240 units are split equally among 3 groups. What is one share? | [
"Total 240.",
"Divide by 3: 80.",
"Select option D."
] | philosophy | Answer: 80
Steps:
1. Total 240.
2. Divide by 3: 80.
3. Select option D.
Answer: (D) | ethics |
Reliability: 87%. | null | phi_0194 | worked_example | en | A process gets 87 of 100 beliefs right. State its reliability percent. | [
"Right: 87.",
"Of 100.",
"= 87%."
] | philosophy | Answer: Reliability: 87%.
Steps:
1. Right: 87.
2. Of 100.
3. = 87%. | epistemology |
Počet: 9. | null | phi_0195 | worked_example | cs | Formule má 4 binárních spojek. Spočítej její podformule. | [
"Atomy: 5.",
"Složené: 4.",
"5 + 4 = 9."
] | philosophy | Answer: Počet: 9.
Steps:
1. Atomy: 5.
2. Složené: 4.
3. 5 + 4 = 9. | logic |
Count: 8. | {
"A": "6",
"B": "10",
"C": "8",
"D": "12"
} | phi_0196 | multiple_choice | en | A thought experiment varies 3 factors with 2 levels each. How many combinations? | [
"2^3.",
"Total: 8.",
"Select option C."
] | philosophy | Answer: 8
Steps:
1. 2^3.
2. Total: 8.
3. Select option C.
Answer: (C) | mind |
Majority is 12 votes. | {
"A": "11",
"B": "12",
"C": "13",
"D": "14"
} | phi_0197 | multiple_choice | en | A council of 22 needs a majority. How many votes is that? | [
"Half of 22.",
"Plus 1: 12.",
"Select option B."
] | philosophy | Answer: 12
Steps:
1. Half of 22.
2. Plus 1: 12.
3. Select option B.
Answer: (B) | political_philosophy |
Total: 12. | null | phi_0198 | worked_example | en | A play has 6 acts with 2 scenes each. Count all scenes. | [
"Acts: 6.",
"Each: 2.",
"6 × 2 = 12."
] | philosophy | Answer: Total: 12.
Steps:
1. Acts: 6.
2. Each: 2.
3. 6 × 2 = 12. | aesthetics |
Net saved: 6. | null | phi_0199 | worked_example | en | A trolley threatens 7 people; diverting saves them all but 1 dies. Compute net lives saved. | [
"Saved: 7.",
"Lost: 1.",
"7 − 1 = 6."
] | philosophy | Answer: Net saved: 6.
Steps:
1. Saved: 7.
2. Lost: 1.
3. 7 − 1 = 6. | ethics |
Count: 7. | null | phi_0200 | worked_example | en | Of 9 peer experts, 2 dissent. Count those who agree. | [
"Total: 9.",
"Dissent: 2.",
"9 − 2 = 7."
] | philosophy | Answer: Count: 7.
Steps:
1. Total: 9.
2. Dissent: 2.
3. 9 − 2 = 7. | epistemology |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.