sample_number int64 8 203k | abstract stringlengths 21 17.4k | article stringlengths 0 18.9k | compressed_article stringlengths 0 10.9k | compression_time float64 0 0.78 | original_tokens int64 0 3.79k | compressed_tokens int64 0 2.29k | token_saving stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
198,588 | we consider the nonlinear inverse problem of reconstructing the heat conductivity of a cooling fin , modeled by a @xmath0-dimensional steady - state equation with robin boundary conditions .
the metropolis hastings markov chain monte carlo algorithm is studied and implemented , as well as the notion of priors . by analyzing the results using certain trial conductivities
, we formulate several distinct priors to aid in obtaining the solution .
these priors are associated with different identifiable parts of the reconstruction , such as areas with vanishing , constant , or varying slopes .
although more research is required for some non - constant conductivities , we believe that using several priors simultaneously could help in solving the problem .
inverse problems , heat diffusion , monte carlo , prior .
a. zambelli antoine_elabdouni@berkeley.edu1 | in this problem , we attempt to reconstruct the _ conductivity _ @xmath1 in a steady state heat equation of the cooling fin on a cpu .
the heat is dissipated both by conduction along the fin and by convection with the air , which gives rise to our equation ( with @xmath2 for convection , @xmath1 for conductivity , @xmath3 for thickness and @xmath4 for temperature ) :
@xmath5 the cpu is connected to the cooling fin along the bottom half of the left edge of the fin .
we use the robin boundary conditions ( detailed in @xcite ) : @xmath6 our data in this problem is the set of boundary points of the solution to ( [ eq : heatpde ] ) , which we compute using a standard finite difference scheme for an @xmath7 mesh ( here @xmath8 or @xmath9 ) .
we denote the correct value of @xmath1 by @xmath10 and the data by @xmath11 . in order to reconstruct @xmath10
, we will take a guess @xmath12 , solve the forward problem using @xmath12 and compare those boundary points to @xmath11 by implementing the metropolis - hastings markov chain monte carlo algorithm ( or mhmcmc ) .
priors will need to be established to aid in the reconstruction , as comparing the boundary points alone is insufficient .
markov chains produce a probability distribution of possible solutions ( in this case conductivities ) that are most likely given the observed data ( the probablility of reaching the next step in the chain is entirely determined by the current step ) .
the algorithm is as follows ( @xcite ) .
given @xmath13 , @xmath14 can be found using the following : 1 .
generate a candidate state @xmath12 from @xmath13 with some distribution @xmath15 .
we can pick any @xmath15 so long as it satisfies 1 .
@xmath16 2 .
@xmath15 is the transition matrix of markov chain on the state space containing @xmath17 .
2 . with probability @xmath18 set @xmath19 , otherwise set @xmath20 ( ie . accept or reject @xmath12 ) .
proceed to the next iteration .
using the probability distributions of our example , ( [ eq : alpha ] ) becomes @xmath21 } \right\}\ ] ] ( where @xmath22 and @xmath23 denote the set of measured boundary points using @xmath12 and @xmath13 respectively , and @xmath24 ) + to simplify ( [ eq : alpha2 ] ) , collect the constants and seperate the terms relating to @xmath12 and @xmath13 : @xmath25}\\ & = & \frac{-1}{2}\sum_{i , j=1}^{n , m}{\left [ \left ( \frac{d_{ij}-d_{ij}'}{\sigma } \right)^2 - \left ( \frac{d_{ij}-d_{n_{ij}}}{\sigma } \right)^2 \right]}\\ & = & \frac{-1}{2}\left [ d ' - d_n \right ] = f_n - f'\end{aligned}\ ] ] now , ( [ eq : alpha2 ] ) reads @xmath26 we now examine the means by which we generate a guess @xmath12 . if the problem consists of reconstructing a constant conductivity , we can implement a uniform change , for every iteration we take a random number @xmath27 between @xmath28 and @xmath29 and add it to every entry in @xmath13 to obtain @xmath12 ( we initialize @xmath30 to a matrix of @xmath31s ) .
the algorithm is highly efficient , and the reconstructed value will consistently converge to that of the solution to within @xmath27 .
+ in order to approximate a nonconstant @xmath10 , the obvious choice is a pointwise change , at each iteration we add @xmath27 to a random entry of @xmath13 , thus genrating @xmath12 .
unfortunately , systematic errors occur at the boundary points of our reconstruction ( they tend to rarely change from their initial position ) . + in order to sidestep this , we use a gridwise change ; change a square of the mesh ( chosen at random as well ) by adding @xmath27 to the four corners of said square . while this fixes the boundary problem , another major issue which arises from a non - uniform change is that the reconstruction will be marred with spikes " , which we must iron out .
to aid in ironing out the wrinkles in the reconstruction we use priors " .
priors generally require some knowledge of the quantity we wish to find , and will add a term to ( [ eq : alpha3 ] ) . naturally , the more unassuming the prior , the more applicable the algorithm .
this applicability will be tested as often as possible throughout these tests .
the first prior compares the sum of the differences between adjacent points of @xmath10 to those of @xmath12 ( keping the spikes in check ) , and is given by @xmath32 @xmath33 and modifying ( [ eq : alpha3 ] ) , we obtain @xmath34 so the guess is most likely if @xmath13 and @xmath12 are similarily smooth ( ie , @xmath35 ) , if an iteration gives a @xmath12 that is noticeably less smooth than the last accepted iteration , we are less likely to accept it .
+ as an initial test for the smoothness prior developed above , we attempt the gridwise change on a constant conductivity ( @xmath36 , using @xmath37 ) . while we can still see the problem at the boundary points , they are limited to being a noticeable nuisance as oppposed to adamantly ruining an otherwise accurate reconstruction ( whose mean comes to within @xmath38 of @xmath39 ) .
the next step is therefore to test the algorithm on a non - constant conductivity . as a simple nonconstant trial
, we look at a tilted plane with constant slope , given by @xmath40 once again , we take @xmath30 to be a matrix of all @xmath31s and @xmath37 .
the boundary points again have trouble increasing from @xmath31 to the desired values , and in so doing lower the mean value of the reconstruction ; though we still consistentily get to within about @xmath41 of the solution ( in @xmath42 iterations )
. tilted plane we wish to reconstruct , and a reconstruction using the smoothness prior.,height=188 ] we now attempt to reconstruct a more complicated conductivity : a gaussian well .
+ the gaussian well is the first real challenge that the algorithm will face , and will be the main focus of the rest of the paper as it contains different regions which require different priors .
it is given by the following equation @xmath43}{0.2}}}\right)}}\ ] ] this conductivity represents a much more significant challenge , with both flat regions , and regions with steep slopes .
after several trials , the optimal @xmath44s were found to be between @xmath31 and @xmath45 , though obataining a specific value for which the reconstruction is best is impossible due to the high innaccuracy of the algorithm when faced with this well .
gaussian well we wish to reconstruct , and a reconstruction using the smoothness prior.,height=188 ] there is an evident need , at this point , for much more precision .
we turn once again to priors , this time developing one that will look at the slopes of the reconstruction .
one of the main concerns in implementing a new prior is the generality mentioned earlier . in theory , one could use a prior that only accepts gaussian wells of the form we have here , but that code would not be very versatile .
we therefore try to keep our slope prior as general as possible . in keeping with this , we look at the ratios of adjacent slopes , both in the @xmath46 and @xmath47 directions , as follows : @xmath48 @xmath49 and define @xmath50 @xmath51 ( where @xmath52 is @xmath53 ) + the generality of these prior terms comes from the fact that they go to @xmath54 so long as the conductivity does nt change its mind .
it is equally happy " with a constant slope as it is with slopes that , say , double , at each grid point . it should be noted that the formulas above break down for regions where we have very small slopes adjacent to large ones , where one ratio goes to @xmath54 while the other grows very large .
nevertheless , we now set @xmath55 with this new prior , we define @xmath56 and use that in the acceptance step of the mhmcmc algorithm . again , as a first test of the algorithm , we test it on the tilted plane .
the reconstructions reach the same precision in @xmath42 iterations as we had with only the smoothness prior , so we have not yet implemented anything that is too problem - specific to the gaussian well .
+ the initial result of the test on the well is arguably substantially better , but still rather imprecise . in an attempt to see more clearly
, we make the mesh finer ( @xmath57 ) . in addition , we set @xmath30 to be a matrix of all @xmath0s
. the results of the combined slope and smoothness priors are below . and @xmath58 gaussian wells with parameters : @xmath59 and @xmath60 , respectively.,height=188 ] as we can see
, a substantial improvement has been made over the attempt in section ( 3.1 ) .
we now consistently obtain somewhat of a bowl shape . in comparing the solution we wish to achieve and the reconstruction we have ,
one notices that the major problem areas are the outer regions , where the conductivity is nearly constant .
as previously stated , equations ( [ eq : px ] ) and ( [ eq : py ] ) break down when the slopes are vanishing , so it is reasonable to assume that with this alone , the reconstruction will not improve as substantially as we need it to . as before ,
we implement another prior to aid us .
to help reconstruct the outermost regions of the well , we need a prior that will go to @xmath54 for regions that have vanishing slope .
the most obvious choice is therefore to use what we computed for the smoothness prior @xmath32 and set @xmath61 using @xmath62 in the mhmcmc algorithm .
again , the worry that adding a new prior would undermine the generality of the algorithm can be eased by noting that we are simply accounting for a problematic case not treated by the slope prior , though we still test this prior on the tilted plane .
the @xmath58 tilted plane is given by @xmath63 running the mhmcmc algorithm with all three priors yields fairly accurate reconstructions , that miss the solution by @xmath64 .
one should again note the presence of the familiar ( though no less troublesome ) boundary points .
tilted plane , and a reconstruction using all three priors.,height=188 ] we now try once again to reconstruct the gaussian well .
the results of the added prior are apparent , and regions with vanishing slope are treated much more accurately than before .
perhaps the most successful reconstruction thus far is the following ( though many more possible combinations of @xmath44 , @xmath65 and w must be explored ) . gaussian well using all three priors , at @xmath45 and @xmath66 million interations.,height=188 ] an obvious flaw in these reconstructions happens to be the width of the well , the algorithm is still capable of reconstructing the center of the well , and its depth , but it is often much narrower than in the actual solution .
it would seem the algorithm has trouble starting to drop off from the vanishing slope region into the varying one .
this exposes an inherent problem with the patchwork we have taken thus far : getting the seams to match up nicely .
as we have seen , reconstructions of the heat conductivity greatly benefit from added priors .
there is certainly much work left to be done , and a very careful analysis of the seams at which the various priors trade off is in order .
however , we believe that in testing the algorithm against other complex nonconstant conductivities , which is the next step we plan to take , it is possible to complete the aforementioned analysis of the seams and reconstruct complex quantities via this patchwork method .
i was introduced to this problem at a national science foundation reu program at george mason university , and would like to thank both of those institutions for the oppurtunity that gave me .
i would also like to thank professors timothy sauer and harbir lamba at gmu , who got me started on this project while i was there and helped me decipher the mhmcmc algorithm . | problem reconstruct conductivity @xmath1 steady state heat equation cooling fin cpu heat dissipated by conduction convection air equation @xmath2 convection @xmath1 conductivity @xmath3 thickness @xmath4 temperature @xmath5 cpu connected to cooling fin bottom half left edge use robin boundary conditions detailed @xcite ) @xmath6 data boundary points solution heatpde ] compute standard finite difference scheme @xmath7 mesh @xmath8 or @xmath9 denote correct value @xmath1 by @xmath10 data by @xmath11 reconstruct @xmath10 take guess @xmath12 solve forward problem @xmath12 compare boundary points to @xmath11 metropolis - hastings markov chain monte carlo algorithm priors established reconstruction comparing boundary points insufficient markov chains produce probability distribution solutions conductivities likely observed data probablility next step determined current step algorithm @xcite @xmath13 @xmath14 found generate candidate state @xmath12 from @xmath13 distribution @xmath15 pick any @xmath15 satisfies @xmath16 @xmath15 transition matrix of markov chain on state space containing @xmath17probability @xmath18 set @xmath19 set @xmath20 accept reject @xmath12 proceed next iteration probability distributions eq : alpha ] becomes @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 denote measured boundary points @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath24 simplify eq alpha2 collect constants seperate terms @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath25}\\ \frac{-1}{2}\sum_{i j=1}^{n m}\left\frac{d_{ij}-d_{ij}'}{\sigma{d_{ij-d_{n_{ij\frac{-1}{2}\left d ' - d_n \right = f_n - f'\end{aligned eq alpha2 ] reads @xmath26 examine generate guess @xmath12 problem reconstructing constant conductivity implement uniform change iteration random number @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 add entry @xmath13 obtain @xmath12 initialize @xmath30 matrix @xmath31s algorithm efficient reconstructed value converge solution @xmath27approximate nonconstant @xmath10 choice is pointwise change each iteration add @xmath27 to random entry @xmath13 genrating @xmath12 systematic errors occur at boundary points reconstruction rarely change from initial position sidestep use gridwise change change square of mesh chosen random by adding @xmath27 to four corners fixes boundary problem issue non - uniform change reconstruction marred with spikes must iron out use priors priors require knowledge of quantity add term to ( [ eq : alpha3 ] ) more unassuming prior more applicable algorithm applicability tested often tests first prior compares differences between adjacent points @xmath10 to @xmath12 spikes given by @xmath32 @xmath33 modifying ( eq : alpha3 ] ) obtain @xmath34 likely if @xmath13 and @xmath12 similarily smooth @xmath35 if iteration @xmath12 less smooth less likely to accept initial test for smoothness attempt gridwise change on constant conductivity ( @xmath36 using @xmath37 )problem at boundary points limited to noticeable nuisance ruining accurate reconstruction mean within @xmath38 of @xmath39 next step test algorithm on non - constant conductivity nonconstant trial at tilted plane with constant slope given by @xmath40 take @xmath30 matrix of @xmath31s and @xmath37 boundary points trouble increasing from @xmath31 to desired values lower mean value reconstruction consistentily get to within @xmath41 of solution in @xmath42 iterations tilted plane reconstruct using smoothness prior attempt to reconstruct complicated conductivity : gaussian well gaussian well first challenge algorithm main focus of paper contains different regions different priors given by equation @xmath43}{0.2}}}\right conductivity significant challenge flat regions and steep slopes optimal @xmath44s between @xmath31 and @xmath45 obataining specific value for reconstruction best impossible due to high innaccuracy of algorithm gaussian well to reconstruct using smoothness prior need for more precision turn to priors developing one at slopes of reconstruction main concerns in implementing new prior is generality mentionedtheory could use prior gaussian wells code not versatile keep slope prior general look at ratios of adjacent slopes in @xmath46 and @xmath47 directions @xmath48 @xmath49 define @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 is @xmath53 ) generality of prior terms from they go to @xmath54 conductivity change happy with constant slope slopes double at each grid point formulas break down for small slopes adjacent to large ones one ratio goes to @xmath54 other grows large set @xmath55 with new prior define @xmath56 use in acceptance step mhmcmc algorithm first test test on tilted plane reconstructions reach same precision in @xmath42 iterations with smoothness prior not implemented problem - specific to gaussian well initial result test on well better imprecise make mesh finer ( @xmath57 ) set @xmath30 matrix of all @xmath0s results of combined slope and smoothness priors are below @xmath58 gaussian wells with parameters @xmath59 and @xmath60 substantial improvement made over attempt section 3.1 ) consistently obtain bowl shape comparing solution reconstruction major problem areas outer regions conductivity nearly constant equations ( [ eq : px ] and ( [ eq : py ] ) break down when slopes vanishing reconstruction improve substantially implement another prior reconstruct outermost regions need prior to @xmath54 for regions vanishing slope obvious choice use smoothness prior @xmath32 set @xmath61 using @xmath62 in mhmcmc algorithm worry adding new prior generality algorithm accounting for problematic case not treated by slope prior test prior on tilted plane @xmath58 tilted plane given by @xmath63 mhmcmc algorithm three priors yields accurate reconstructions solution by @xmath64 presence of familiar boundary points tilted plane reconstruction using all three priors try to reconstruct gaussian well results of added prior apparent regions with vanishing slope treated more accurately most successful reconstruction more possible combinations of @xmath44 @xmath65 w gaussian well using all three priors at @xmath45 and @xmath66 million interations.,height=188 ] obvious flaw in reconstructions width of well algorithm capable of reconstructing center depth but often narrower than actual solution algorithm trouble drop off from vanishing slope region into varying one exposes problem with patchwork : getting seams to match up reconstructions of heat conductivity benefit from added priors much work left to be done careful analysis of seams off in order believe in testing algorithm against complex nonconstant conductivities possible to complete analysis of seams reconstruct complex quantities via patchwork method introduced to problem at national science foundation reu program at george mason university thank institutions for oppurtunity thank professors timothy sauer and harbir lamba at gmu project helped decipher mhmcmc algorithm | 0.447641 | 2,795 | 1,446 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,590 | we propose an update estimation method for a diffusion parameter from high - frequency dependent data under a nuisance drift element .
we ensure the asymptotic equivalence of the estimator to the corresponding quasi - mle , which has the asymptotic normality and the asymptotic efficiency .
we give a simulation example to illustrate the theory . | in general , under some appropriate conditions , @xmath0-estimators enjoy some nice properties , for example , the asymptotic efficiency of ( quasi-)mle and oracle properties of regularized estimators .
however , it may suffer from heavy computation load since it is batch estimation in the sense that we have to optimize the appropriate objective function .
it would be of great help to be able to carry out recursive estimation , where we update the estimator by doing some fine tuning of the previous one . in this way
, it enables us to process enormous data effectively .
recursive estimation is established as an application of stochastic approximation theory , which is mainly used in control system and computer science ( see e.g. , robbins and monro @xcite , nevelson and khasminskii @xcite , dvoretzky @xcite , borkar @xcite ) .
the case of independent data was developed by , among others , fabian @xcite and @xcite .
we refer to sharia @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite for asymptotics of time - series model recursive estimator .
see kutoyants ( * ? ? ?
* section 2.6.6 ) and lazrieva et al .
@xcite as well as the references therein for the case of continuous - time data from a diffusion model .
the model we consider through this paper is the scaled wiener process with drift : @xmath1 where @xmath2 is a random and time - varying nuisance process .
suppose that we observe only discrete - time sample @xmath3 for @xmath4 with @xmath5 , where @xmath6 .
we know that the quasi - mle of a true value @xmath7 with regarding @xmath8 is @xmath9 where @xmath10 , and @xmath11 has the asymptotic normality and the asymptotic efficiency .
the aim of this paper is to propose an update estimation method for the diffusion parameter @xmath12 under the nuisance drift element @xmath13 .
specifically , we wish to construct a sequence of estimates @xmath14 , computed in a recursive manner , in such a way that for any @xmath15 , the difference @xmath16 is a function described by @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 , and some ( not all ) data , and @xmath20 exhibits suitable convergence property for an arbitrary initial value @xmath21 .
usually this estimator does not require any numerically hard optimization , while its asymptotic behavior does require careful investigation .
note the difference from the recursive ( online ) estimation for sample @xmath22 , where each successive estimator is obtained by using data observed one after another .
we will bring about good asymptotic property of @xmath20 as efficient as the quasi - mle , i.e we ensure the asymptotic equivalence of @xmath20 to @xmath23 : @xmath24 this paper is organized as follows . in section [ sec : objective ] , we propose an update formula and give a main theorem with the proof .
we consider an example and present the simulation result to illustrate the theory in section [ sec : sim ] .
we consider the scaled wiener process with drift , where @xmath2 is a random and time - varying nuisance process and @xmath25 .
we denote by @xmath26 the family of distributions of @xmath27 associated with @xmath12 : @xmath28 , @xmath29 .
let @xmath30 , the underlying filtration .
suppose that we observe only discrete - time sample @xmath31 for @xmath32 with @xmath5 , where @xmath33 .
we wish to estimate the true value @xmath34 based on @xmath35 .
as is well known , the quasi - likelihood function , denote by @xmath36 , with regarding @xmath8 is @xmath37 therefore , the quasi - mle of @xmath12 is , and @xmath11 has the asymptotic normality @xmath38 and the asymptotic efficiency .
the aim of this paper is to propose an update estimation method for the diffusion parameter @xmath12 having the form @xmath39 where @xmath40 is an appropriate fine tuning function .
the upper index @xmath41 implies that we have the data set @xmath35 . under the nuisance drift element @xmath13
, we ensure the asymptotic equivalence of @xmath20 to @xmath23 .
therefore , the asymptotic normality and the asymptotic efficiency of @xmath20 hold .
we now define some notations : denote @xmath42 and @xmath43 by the convergence rate and the asymptotic variance of @xmath23 , respectively , i.e. , @xmath44 and @xmath45 .
we also define the quasi - likelihood function as @xmath46 . then , we propose the following update formula : @xmath47 note that , in finite sample , this formula is more stable than the one which is derived by direct using of the newton - raphson method .
we have @xmath48 hence the update formula is @xmath49 note that right - hand side of is positive a.s . for any initial value @xmath50 .
then , for any @xmath51 and @xmath15 we define @xmath52 note that @xmath53 for @xmath15 .
now , we set two assumptions : there exists @xmath54 such that @xmath55 .
[ ass : hn - rate2 ] @xmath56\xrightarrow{p } 0 ; \label{ass : m1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath57<\infty .
\label{ass : m2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] [ ass : moment ] the notation @xmath58 in assumption [ ass : hn - rate2 ] means that @xmath59 .
the following theorem [ thm : mainthm ] is a main result in this paper .
consider the model .
assume that assumptions [ ass : hn - rate2 ] and [ ass : moment ] hold .
then , for any @xmath50 the update formula generates an estimator @xmath20 , which is asymptotic equivalent to @xmath23 : @xmath60 therefore , it has the asymptotic normality : @xmath61 and the asymptotic efficiency .
[ thm : mainthm ] to prove the theorem , we use the result of sharia ( * ? ?
* lemma 1 ) .
we change some notations from the original ones of sharia @xcite in terms of a triangular array of random variables .
we drop the index @xmath41 to simplify some notations .
we can rewrite to @xmath62 where @xmath63 moreover , we define the following notations : @xmath64 ; \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath65 @xmath66 where @xmath67 and @xmath68 , and introduce the conditions of sharia ( * ? ?
* lemma 1 ) applied to our model setting : 1 .
@xmath69 + w.r.t .
@xmath70 , where @xmath71 is a random variable with @xmath72 ; 2 .
@xmath73 + in probability @xmath70 ; 3 .
@xmath74 + in probability @xmath70 .
now , let us show the above conditions and derive the _ local asymptotic linearity _ of @xmath20 : @xmath75 where @xmath76 is a linear statistic .
clearly , ( i ) holds since we have @xmath77 . to check ( ii ) , we calculate @xmath78 \nn \\ & = -\frac{1}{2\hat{\beta}_{j-1}}+\frac{\beta_{0}}{2\hat{\beta}_{j-1}^{2}}\left(1 + 2\sqrt{\frac{h_{n}}{\beta_{0}}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[y_{j}\overline{\mu}_{j}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]+\frac{h_{n}}{\beta_{0}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[|\overline{\mu}_{j}|^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]\right ) \nn \\ & = -\frac{d_{j-1}}{2\hat{\beta}_{j-1}^{2}}+\frac{\sqrt{h_{n}\beta_{0}}}{\hat{\beta}_{j-1}^{2}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[y_{j}\overline{\mu}_{j}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]+\frac{h_{n}}{2\hat{\beta}_{j-1}^{2}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[|\overline{\mu}_{j}|^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right ] , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath79+\frac{h_{n}}{2\hat{\beta}_{j-1}^{2}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[|\overline{\mu}_{j}|^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]\right\ } \nn \\ & = \frac{1}{\beta_{0}^{2}}\left(-\frac{d_{j-1}}{2}+\sqrt{h_{n}\beta_{0}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[y_{j}\overline{\mu}_{j}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]+\frac{h_{n}}{2}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[|\overline{\mu}_{j}|^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]\right ) .
\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] hence , we have @xmath80+\frac{h_{n}}{2}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[|\overline{\mu}_{j}|^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]\right ) \nn \\ & = \frac{1}{\beta_{0}^{2}}\left(\sqrt{h_{n}\beta_{0}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[y_{j}\overline{\mu}_{j}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]+\frac{h_{n}}{2}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[|\overline{\mu}_{j}|^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]\right ) , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] and therefore @xmath81+\frac{h_{n}}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{j=1}^{n}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[|\overline{\mu}_{j}|^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right ] . \label{eq:(ii)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first term of converges to @xmath82 in probability @xmath70 since we assume .
let us show @xmath83\rightarrow 0 \nonumber \ ] ] in probability @xmath70 .
then , by making use of markov s inequality , assumption [ ass : hn - rate2 ] and , we obtain for any @xmath84 @xmath85\lesssim h_{n}\sqrt{n}\rightarrow 0 , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] hence ( ii ) . to check the condition ( iii )
, we also calculate @xmath86-\frac{h_{n}}{2\hat{\beta}_{j-1}^{2}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[\overline{\mu}_{j}^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]\right\}-\left\{-\frac{1}{2\beta_{0}}+\frac{\beta_{0}}{2\beta_{0}^{2}}\left(y_{j}+\overline{\mu}_{j}\sqrt{\frac{h_{n}}{\beta_{0}}}\right)^{2}\right\ } \nn \\ & = \frac{1}{\beta_{0}^{2}}\left\{-\frac{\hat{\beta}_{j-1}}{2}+\frac{\beta_{0}}{2}\left(y_{j}+\overline{\mu}_{j}\sqrt{\frac{h_{n}}{\beta_{0}}}\right)^{2}+\frac{d_{j-1}}{2}-\sqrt{h_{n}\beta_{0}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[y_{j}\overline{\mu}_{j}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]-\frac{h_{n}}{2}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[|\overline{\mu}_{j}|^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]\right\ } \nn \\ & \ \ \ + \frac{1}{2\beta_{0}}-\frac{1}{2\beta_{0}}\left(y_{j}+\overline{\mu}_{j}\sqrt{\frac{h_{n}}{\beta_{0}}}\right)^{2 } \nn \\ & = \frac{1}{\beta_{0}^{2}}\left(-\sqrt{h_{n}\beta_{0}}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[y_{j}\overline{\mu}_{j}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]-\frac{h_{n}}{2}e_{\beta_{0}}\left[|\overline{\mu}_{j}|^{2}\big|\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right]\right ) . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] assumptions [ ass : hn - rate2 ] and [ ass : moment ] also ensure the condition ( iii ) : @xmath87 in probability @xmath70 .
consequently , we derive the local asymptotic linearity from sharia ( * ? ? ? * lemma 1 ) . in this case , we obtain @xmath88 therefore we can conclude the claim .
see e.g. , jacod and shiryaev @xcite for more detailed discussion on the asymptotic properties of an asymptotically linear estimator .
we performed a simulation study to validate our proposed update formula .
we consider the model @xmath90 where we know the true value @xmath91 .
note that this means @xmath92 , hence assumption [ ass : moment ] holds .
we set @xmath93 , data size @xmath94 and the monte carlo trial number @xmath95 .
we also set @xmath96 to satisfy assumption [ ass : hn - rate2 ] .
we generate @xmath97 through the following steps : we repeat step 1 and 2 @xmath105 times .
the following figures preset the simulation results . figures [ fig : sam ] and [ fig : beta - trace ] are traces of data @xmath106 and @xmath101 at @xmath107 , respectively ( @xmath108 denote each steps of monte carlo trials ) .
@xmath109-axis has update times @xmath110 . the dotted line in figure [ fig : beta - trace ] denotes the true value @xmath111 . in figure [
fig : average - trace ] we plot @xmath112 for @xmath110 , where @xmath113 and @xmath114 denotes the value of @xmath101 at @xmath115 . we give a qq - plot for @xmath116 in figure [ fig : qqplot ] . from the figure [ fig : average - trace ]
, we expect that @xmath117 as @xmath118 .
actually , whenever we repeat this algorithm , @xmath119 nearly equal to @xmath7 and standard deviations are not so large ( about @xmath120 ) .
we also expect that @xmath121 as @xmath118 from the qq - plot in figure [ fig : qqplot ] since the plots almost lay on the 45 degree line .
n. lazrieva , t. sharia , and t. toronjadze .
semimartingale stochastic approximation procedure and recursive estimation .
, 153(3):211261 , 2008 .
nevelson , r.z .
providence , ri : american mathematical society , 1973 . | under conditions @xmath0-estimators enjoy nice properties asymptotic efficiency quasi- oracle properties regularized estimators may suffer from heavy computation load batch estimation optimize objective function to recursive estimation estimator fine tuning previous process enormous data recursive estimation application stochastic approximation theory used in control system computer science robbins monro nevelson khasminskii dvoretzky borkar independent data developed by fabian @xcite @xcite refer to sharia for asymptotics of time - series model recursive estimator see kutoyants section 2.6.6 lazrieva et al . for continuous - time data from diffusion model model scaled wiener process with drift : @xmath1 @xmath2 random time - varying nuisance process observe discrete - time sample @xmath3 for @xmath4 @xmath5 quasi - mle of true value @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 has asymptotic normality asymptotic efficiency update estimation method for diffusion parameter @xmath12 under nuisance drift element @xmath13 construct sequence estimates @xmath14 computed recursive @xmath15 difference @xmath16 function described by @xmath17 data @xmath20 convergence for arbitrary initial value @xmath21 estimator numerically hard optimization asymptotic behavior investigation difference from recursive estimation for @xmath22 estimator obtained using data observed good asymptotic property of @xmath20 quasi - mle ensure asymptotic equivalence of @xmath20 to @xmath23 : @xmath24 paper organized propose update formula main theorem proof consider example simulation result scaled wiener process with drift @xmath2 random time - varying nuisance process @xmath25 denote @xmath26 family of distributions of @xmath27 with @xmath12 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 underlying filtration observe discrete - time sample @xmath31 for @xmath32 with @xmath5 estimate true value @xmath34 based on @xmath35 quasi - likelihood function by @xmath36 @xmath8 @xmath37 quasi - mle of @xmath12 @xmath11 has asymptotic normality @xmath38 asymptotic efficiencyaim paper propose update estimation method diffusion parameter @xmath12 form @xmath39 @xmath40 fine tuning function upper index @xmath41 implies data set @xmath35 nuisance drift element @xmath13 ensure asymptotic equivalence @xmath20 to @xmath23 asymptotic normality efficiency @xmath20 hold define notations @xmath42 @xmath43 convergence rate asymptotic variance @xmath23 @xmath44 @xmath45 define quasi - likelihood function @xmath46 propose update formula @xmath47 finite sample formula more stable newton - raphson method @xmath48 update formula @xmath49 right - hand side positive initial value @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath15 define @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath15 set two assumptions @xmath54 @xmath55 ass hn - rate2 @xmath56 @xmath57 notation @xmath58 assumption ass hn - rate2 means @xmath59 theorem thm : mainthm main result paper model assume assumptions [ ass : hn - rate2 ass : moment ] hold@xmath50 update formula generates estimator @xmath20 asymptotic equivalent to @xmath23 : @xmath60 asymptotic normality @xmath61 asymptotic efficiency prove theorem use result sharia lemma 1 ) change notations original triangular array random variables drop index @xmath41 simplify notations rewrite to @xmath62 @xmath63 define notations @xmath64 ; @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 introduce conditions sharia model setting @xmath69 + @xmath70 @xmath71 random variable with @xmath72 @xmath73 + probability @xmath70 3 @xmath74 + probability @xmath70 show conditions derive local asymptotic linearity of @xmath20 : @xmath75 @xmath76 linear statistic ( i ) holds @xmath77check calculate @xmath78 -\frac{1\beta{j-1}}+\beta{0}}{j-1{2}}\frac{h\beta{0{0}}{f{t{j-1}}\frac{h_{n}}{\beta{{0}}\overline{j{2}\mathcal{f}{t_{j-1}} -\frac{d_{j-1}}\beta{j-1}{2}}+{h\beta_{0}}}\beta{j-1}{2}}e{\beta_{0}}\overline{{j{f{t{j-1}}+\frac{h_{n}}{2\hat{\beta}{j-1}{2}}e{\beta_{0}}\overline{{j{2}\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}{aligned @xmath79+\frac{h_{n}}{2{\beta}{j-1}{\beta_{0}}\overline{\mu{j{2}\big\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\right\frac{1\beta{2}}{j-1}}{2}{h\beta\left\overline{j}\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\frac{h_{n}}{2\beta{0}}\left\overline\mu}_{j}{2}\big{f}{t_{j-1}}\nonumber{aligned} @xmath80+\frac{h_{n}}{2{\beta_{0}}\overline{j}^{2}\big\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}} \frac{1}{\beta_{0}^{2}}\left{h_{n\beta_\overline{j\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\frac{h_{n}}{2}e{\beta_{0}}\overline{2}\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\nonumber{aligned} @xmath81+\frac{h_{n}}{n}}_{j=1}{\beta_{0}}\overline{{j}{2}\big\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}{eq:(ii)}\end{aligned} first term converges @xmath82 probability @xmath70 @xmath83\rightarrow 0 probability @xmath70 markov s inequality assumption obtain @xmath84 @xmath85 h_{n}\sqrt{n}\rightarrow 0\nonumber\end{aligned}check condition calculate @xmath86\frac{h\beta{0}}\left\overline{\mu}{j{2}\mathcal{f}{j-1}}\frac{1{2\beta{0}}\frac\beta\beta{2}}\left\overline{\mu}{j}\frac{h\beta{0}}}\frac{1}{\beta_{0}{2}}\left\frac\beta{2}+\frac{\beta_{0}}{2}\left\overline{\mu}{j}\frac{h\beta{0}+\frac{d{j-1}}{2}\beta{0}}\left\overline{\mu}{j}{f{j-1}}\frac{h{n}}{2\beta{0}}\left\overline{\mu}{j}{2}\mathcal{f}{t{j-1}}\frac{1}{2\beta{0}}\frac{1}{2\beta{0}}\left}+\overline{\mu}{j}frac{h_{n}}\beta_{0}}}^{2 }\frac{1}{\beta_{0}^{2}}\left{h_{n}\beta_\left\overline\mu{j}\mathcal{f}_{t_{j-1}}\frac{h_{n}}{2}e{\beta_{0}}\left\overline}{j}^{2}\mathcal{f}{t_{j-1}}\nonumber\end{aligned} assumptions hn - rate2 moment ensure condition @xmath87 probability @xmath70 derive local asymptotic linearity from sharia lemma 1 obtain @xmath88 conclude claim jacod shiryaev asymptotic properties linear estimator simulation study update formula consider model @xmath90 true value @xmath91 @xmath92 assumption moment holds set @xmath93 data size @xmath94 monte carlo trial number @xmath95 set @xmath96 satisfy assumption hn - rate2 generate @xmath97 repeat step 1 2 @xmath105 times figures preset simulation resultsfigures sam beta - trace traces data @xmath106 @xmath101 @xmath107 steps monte carlo trials @xmath109-axis update times @xmath110 dotted line beta - trace true value @xmath111 average - trace plot @xmath112 for @xmath110 @xmath113 @xmath114 value @xmath101 @xmath115 qq - plot @xmath116 figure qqplot expect @xmath117 as @xmath118 @xmath119 equal to @xmath7 standard deviations not large @xmath120 expect @xmath121 as @xmath118 from qq - plot plots 45 degree line n. lazrieva t. sharia t. toronjadze semimartingale stochastic approximation procedure recursive estimation 153(3):211261 2008 nevelson providence american mathematical society 1973 | 0.608494 | 3,628 | 2,020 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,591 | within a cosmological framework , we provide a hamiltonian analysis of the mixmaster universe dynamics on the base of a standard arnowitt - deser - misner approach , showing how the chaotic behavior characterizing the evolution of the system near the cosmological singularity can be obtained as the semiclassical limit of the canonical quantization of the model in the same dynamical representation .
+ the relation between this intrinsic chaotic behavior and the indeterministic quantum dynamics is inferred through the coincidence between the microcanonical probability distribution and the semiclassical quantum one .
* mixmaster chaoticity as semiclassical limit of the canonical quantum dynamics * * giovanni imponente@xmath0 + giovanni montani@xmath1 * @xmath2 dipartimento di fisica universit di napoli `` federico ii '' + @xmath3 dipartimento di fisica universit di roma `` la sapienza '' + @xmath4 infn napoli + @xmath5 icra international center for relativistic astrophysics + c / o dip .
fisica ( g9 ) , piazzale aldo moro 5 , 00185 roma , italy + e - mail : imponente@icra.it , montani@icra.it pacs : 04.20.jb , 98.80.dr , 83c | the simplest and most interesting generalization of the friedmann - lemaitre - robertson - walker ( flrw ) cosmology is the bianchi ix model , whose geometry has the homogeneity constraint but the dynamics makes allowance of anisotropic evolution of different ( linearly independent ) spatial directions .
belinski , kalatnikov and lifshitz ( bkl ) at the end of sixties @xcite derived the oscillatory regime characterizing the asymptotic evolution near the cosmological singularity , describing via a discrete map the resulting chaos . + this mixmaster @xcite dynamics , whose geometry is invariant under the @xmath6 group , allows the line element to be decomposed as a flrw model plus a gravitational waves packet ( @xcite , @xcite ) sufficiently far from the singularity .
+ the various approaches in terms of continuous variables ( i.e. construction of an invariant measure for the system @xcite and study of the system covariance @xcite-@xcite ) have shown how this chaotic feature is invariant with respect to any choice of the temporal gauge and how in this sense it is intrinsic .
+ such deep nature of the mixmaster deterministic chaos and its very early appearance in the universe evolution lead to believe in the existence of a relation with the quantum behavior the system performs during the planckian era .
+ the aim of this paper is to give a precise meaning to this relation by constructing the semiclassical limit of a schedinger approach to the canonical quantization of the arnowitt - deser - misner ( adm ) dynamics whose corresponding probability distribution coincides with the ( deterministic ) microcanonical one .
+ in section [ billiard ] are outlined the stochastic properties of the mixmaster dynamics , being isomorphic to a billiard on a lobachevsky plane and is given a stationary statistical distribution within the framework of the microcanonical ensemble .
+ in section [ limit ] we show the existence of a direct correspondence between the classical and quantum dynamics outlined by the common form of the continuity equation for the statistical distribution and the one for the first order approximation in the semiclassical expansion . + as a remarkable feature , both formalisms ( the classical and the quantum one ) are constructed in a generic temporal gauge .
as well known ( see @xcite ) , the dynamics of the bianchi type ix model , in terms of generic misner - chitr like ( mcl ) variables @xmath7 and corresponding coniugate momenta , is summarized by the variational principle @xmath8 where @xmath9 and @xmath10 denotes a potential term which , asymptotically to the singularity , is modeled by the potential wall @xmath11 being @xmath12 ( @xmath13 ) the anisotropy parameters @xcite , such that the motion of the point universe is restricted in the domain @xmath14 ( see figure [ fig : domain ] ) .
such a dynamical scheme has the relevant feature to let free the choice of the lapse function unless explicitly chosen the form of the function @xmath15 .
the bounces against the potential walls and the instability of the geodesic flow on the lobachevsky plane let the dynamics acquire a stochastic feature .
moreover in @xmath14 the adm hamiltonian , where the anisotropy parameters @xmath12 are simultaneously greater than 0 .
[ fig : domain],width=302 ] becomes ( asymptotically ) an `` energy - like '' integral of motion @xmath16 , say @xmath17 .
as shown in @xcite , the jacobi metric associated with the principle ( [ qnew ] ) describes a point
universe moving over a lobachevsky plane reduced by the potential walls ( [ aa ] ) to a billiard .
the statistics of the mixmaster stochasticity is reformulated following the lines presented in @xcite , @xcite and @xcite to derive the invariant measure .
+ this system is well - described by a _ microcanonical ensemble _ , whose liouville invariant measure @xmath18 can be obtained as a solution of the continuity equation @xmath19 over the reduced phase space denotes the @xmath20-circle of the momentum space variable . ]
@xmath21 , @xmath18 explicitly reads @xmath22 using generic mcl variables , the above invariant measure is independent of the choice of the temporal gauge , i.e. of the lapse function . in order to restrict the invariant measure to the two - dimensional space @xmath23
, we stress how the original hamiltonian equations in the asymptotic limit for which @xmath24 get in @xmath14 the free geodesic motion @xcite @xmath25 by this system , we easily rewrite the stationary continuity equation in the form @xmath26 when assuming the independence of the distribution function @xmath27 from @xmath20 , then the normalization condition leads to the restricted function @xmath28 thus , we get the following continuity equation for @xmath29 @xmath30 where @xmath20 plays the role of a parameter and the corresponding _ microcanonical _ solution on the whole configuration space @xmath31 reads @xmath32 we conclude observing how the hamilton equations retain the same form even when the potential walls have a finite ( non - zero ) value .
what above outlined is a mixmaster intrinsic feature and not an effect induced by a particular class of references : the whole mcl formalism and its consequences has been developed in a framework free from the choice of a specific time gauge .
+ since chaos appears close enough to the big bang , we infer that it has some relations with the indeterministic quantum dynamics the model performs in the _ planckian era_. this relation between quantum and deterministic chaos is searched in the sense of a semiclassical limit for a canonical quantization of the model .
the asymptotical principle ( [ qnew ] ) describes a two dimensional hamiltonian system , which can be quantized by a natural schredinger approach @xmath33 being @xmath34 the wave function for the point - universe and , implementing @xmath35 ( see ( [ n2 ] ) ) to an operator = i\hbar \ , , \qquad \left [ \hat{\theta},\hat{p_{\theta}}\right ] = i\hbar \ , .\ ] ] ] , i.e. @xmath36 the equation ( [ sch ] ) rewrites explicitly , in the asymptotic limit @xmath37 , @xmath38^{1/2 } \psi \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we took an appropriate symmetric normal ordering prescription and we left @xmath39 to stress that the potential can not be neglected on the entire configuration space @xmath31 .
being @xmath39 equal to infinity out of @xmath14 , @xmath40 requires as boundary condition to vanish outside the potential walls , say @xmath41 the _ quantum _ equation ( [ sch1 ] ) is equivalent to the wheeler - dewitt one for the same bianchi model , once separated the positive and negative frequencies solutions @xcite , with the advantage that now @xmath42 is a real time variable .
since the potential walls @xmath39 are time independent , a solution of this equation has the form @xmath43 where @xmath44 are constant coefficients and we assumed a discrete `` energy '' spectrum because the quantum point - universe is restricted in the finite region @xmath14 ; the position ( [ sol ] ) in ( [ sch1 ] ) leads to the eigenvalue problem @xmath45 \varphi_n = \nonumber \\ = { \left(\frac{{e_n}^2-u_{\infty}}{\hbar^2}\right ) } \varphi_n \equiv \frac{{e_{\infty}}^2_n}{\hbar^2 } \varphi_n \ , .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] in what follows we search the semiclassical solution of this equation regarding the eigenvalue @xmath46 as a finite constant ( i.e. we consider the potential walls as finite ) and only at the end of the procedure we will take the limit for @xmath39 .
we infer that , in the semiclassical limit when @xmath47 and the `` occupation number '' @xmath48 tends to infinity ( but @xmath49 approaches a finite value ) , the wave function @xmath50 approaches a function @xmath51 as @xmath52 the expression for @xmath51 is taken as a semiclassical expansion up to the first order , i.e. @xmath53 where @xmath54 and @xmath55 are functions to be determined . + substituting ( [ expa ] ) in ( [ eig ] ) and separating the real from the complex part , we get two independent equations , i.e. @xmath56\sqrt{r } \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we multiplied both sides by @xmath57 and , respectively , @xmath58 in the limit @xmath47 the second term of ( [ 1eq ] ) is negligible meanwhile the first one reduces to the hamilton - jacobi equation @xmath59 the solution of ( [ hamb ] ) can be easily checked to be is due to the model adopted and does not affect the probability distribution . ]
@xmath60 we observe that ( [ hamb ] ) , through the identifications @xmath61 is reduced to the algebraic relation @xmath62 the constraint ( [ hamr ] ) is nothing more than the asymptotic one @xmath63 and can be solved by setting @xmath64 where @xmath65 is a momentum - function related to @xmath66 and @xmath67 by the dynamics . on the other hand , by ( [ esse ] )
we get @xmath68 to verify the compatibility of these expressions with ( [ sethm ] ) we use the equations of motion ( [ ham ] ) @xmath69 the required compatibility comes from the identification @xmath70 . since @xmath71 we see by ( [ esse ] ) that the solution @xmath72 vanishes , as due in presence of infinite potential walls , outside @xmath14 .
+ the substitution in ( [ 2eq ] ) of the positions ( [ sethm ] ) ( when the potential walls become infinite , because of chaotic dynamics , @xmath20 behaves like an independent variable and plays here the role of a free parameter ) leads to the new equation @xmath73 we emphasize how this equation coincides with ( [ cont2 ] ) , provided the identification @xmath74 ; it is just this correspondence between the statistical and the semiclassical quantum analysis to ensure that the indeterminism of the quantum dynamics for the bianchi ix model approaches the deterministic chaos in the considered limit . + any constant function is a solution of ( [ cont3 ] ) , but the normalization condition requires @xmath75 and therefore we finally get @xmath76 say the limit for the quantum probability distribution as @xmath77 and @xmath47 associated to the wave function @xmath78 coincides with the classical statistical distribution on the microcanonical ensemble .
+ though this formalism of correspondence remains valid for all bianchi models , only the types viii and ix admit a normalizable wave function @xmath79 , being confined in @xmath14 , and a continuity equation ( [ cont2 ] ) which has a real statistical meaning .
+ since referred to stationary states @xmath80 , the considered semiclassical limit has to be intended in view of a `` macroscopic '' one and is not related to the temporal evolution of the model @xcite . | simplest generalization of friedmann - lemaitre robertson - walker cosmology is bianchi ix model geometry homogeneity dynamics anisotropic evolution different spatial directions belinski kalatnikov lifshitz derived oscillatory regime asymptotic evolution near cosmological singularity describing resulting chaos mixmaster @xcite dynamics geometry invariant under @xmath6 group allows line element as flrw model plus gravitational waves packet far from singularity approaches construction invariant measure for system @xcite study system covariance @xcite- shown chaotic feature invariant temporal gauge intrinsic deep nature mixmaster deterministic chaos early appearance in universe evolution relation with quantum behavior during planckian era aim paper meaning relation constructing semiclassical limit of schedinger approach to quantization of arnowitt - deser - misner dynamics probability distribution coincides with microcanonical one in section [ billiard ] outlined stochastic properties of mixmaster dynamics isomorphic to billiard on lobachevsky plane stationary statistical distribution within microcanonical ensemblesection [ limit ] show direct correspondence between classical quantum dynamics by continuity equation for statistical distribution first order approximation semiclassical expansion formalisms classical quantum constructed in generic temporal gauge dynamics of bianchi type ix model generic misner - chitr like mcl variables @xmath7 coniugate momenta summarized by variational principle @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 potential term modeled by potential wall @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 anisotropy parameters motion point universe restricted in domain @xmath14 figure dynamical scheme choice of lapse function unless chosen @xmath15 bounces against potential walls instability geodesic flow on lobachevsky plane let dynamics acquire stochastic feature in @xmath14 adm hamiltonian anisotropy parameters @xmath12 greater than 0 becomes `` energy - like '' integral of motion @xmath16 @xmath17 jacobi metric principle describes point universe moving over lobachevsky plane reduced by potential walls to billiard statistics mixmaster stochasticity reformulated @xcite derive invariant measure system described by microcanonical ensemble liouville invariant measure @xmath18 solution continuity equation @xmath19 reduced phase space @xmath20-circle momentum space variable @xmath21 @xmath18 reads @xmath22 mcl variables invariant measure independent of temporal gauge lapse function restrict invariant measure to two - dimensional space @xmath23 original hamiltonian equations asymptotic limit @xmath24 @xmath14 free geodesic motion @xcite @xmath25 rewrite stationary continuity equation @xmath26 independence distribution function @xmath27 from @xmath20 normalization condition leads to restricted function @xmath28 continuity equation for @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath20 parameter microcanonical solution configuration space @xmath31 reads @xmath32 hamilton equations retain same form potential walls finite non - zero value mixmaster intrinsic feature not effect class references mcl formalism developed framework free from specific time gauge chaos close to big bang relations with indeterministic quantum dynamics planckian erarelation between quantum deterministic chaos semiclassical limit for canonical quantization model asymptotical principle qnew describes two dimensional hamiltonian system quantized by natural schredinger approach @xmath33 @xmath34 wave function point - universe implementing @xmath35 n2 operator = i\hbar\hbar @xmath36 equation sch rewrites asymptotic limit @xmath37 @xmath38^{1/2 } \psi symmetric normal ordering prescription @xmath39 stress potential not neglected entire configuration space @xmath31 @xmath39 equal to infinity @xmath14 @xmath40 requires boundary condition vanish outside potential walls @xmath41 quantum equation ( sch1 equivalent to wheeler - dewitt one bianchi model separated positive negative frequencies solutions @xmath42 real time variablepotential walls @xmath39 time independent solution equation form @xmath43 @xmath44 constant coefficients discrete energy spectrum quantum point - universe restricted finite region @xmath14 position [ sol ] sch1 ] leads eigenvalue problem @xmath45 \varphi_n\nonumber\left\frac{{e_n}^2-u\infty}}\hbar^2\right\equiv\infty}}^2_n\hbar^2{aligned semiclassical solution eigenvalue @xmath46 finite constant potential walls finite end limit @xmath39 semiclassical limit @xmath47 occupation number @xmath48 tends infinity @xmath49 approaches finite value wave function @xmath50 approaches function @xmath51 @xmath52 expression @xmath51 semiclassical expansion first order @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 functions determined substituting [ expa ] ) ( [ eig ] ) separating real complex part two independent equations@xmath56 multiplied sides by @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath47 second term of ( [ 1eq ] negligible first reduces to hamilton - jacobi equation @xmath59 solution of ( [ hamb ] due to model affect probability distribution @xmath60 ( [ hamb ] ) @xmath61 reduced to algebraic relation @xmath62 constraint ( [ hamr ] ) asymptotic one @xmath63 solved @xmath64 @xmath65 momentum - function related to @xmath66 @xmath67 [ esse ] @xmath68 compatibility [ sethm ] equations motion [ ham ] @xmath69 compatibility from identification @xmath70 @xmath71 solution @xmath72 vanishes infinite potential walls @xmath14 substitution in [ 2eq ] positions ( [ sethm ] potential walls infinite @xmath20 independent variable free parameter leads new equation @xmath73 equation coincides with ( [ cont2 ] ) identification @xmath74 correspondence between statistical semiclassical quantum analysis indeterminism quantum dynamics bianchi ix model deterministic chaos limitconstant function solution [ cont3 ] ) normalization requires @xmath75 @xmath76 limit quantum probability distribution @xmath77 @xmath47 wave function @xmath78 coincides classical statistical distribution microcanonical ensemble correspondence valid bianchi models types viii ix admit normalizable wave function @xmath79 confined @xmath14 continuity equation [ cont2 ] ) statistical meaning stationary states @xmath80 semiclassical limit macroscopic one not related temporal evolution model | 0.432931 | 2,443 | 1,286 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,601 | we present measurements of the total inelastic pp cross section at obtained with the cms detector .
two different methods are used . in runs with low event pile - up
, we exploit the large pseudorapidity coverage ( @xmath0 ) of the cms calorimeters to obtain the cross section for events with any activity in the acceptance range .
in addition , runs with high event pile - up are used by fitting a poisson distribution with the total visible cross section as parameter to the number of reconstructed primary vertices .
both measurements are corrected to a hadron level definition of the inelastic cross section . | the cross sections of hadronic collisions are important and fundamental quantities in high energy particle and nuclear physics and have been studied in the last 40 years in experiments covering many orders of magnitude in center - of - mass energies . in this report
we present two methods for measuring the inelastic proton - proton cross section with the cms detector .
data collected in 2010 were used in both analyses but with different luminosity and pile - up conditions .
low pile - up data were used to count events with activity in either of the hadron forward calorimeters ( hf ) in the first method presented . the other method used high luminosity data to count pile - up events in a given bunch crossing as a function of bunch luminosity and fitted with a poisson distribution to evaluate the cross section .
both measurements are corrected to hadron level definitions of the inelastic @xmath1 cross section . from these definitions
, extrapolations are performed to the total inelastic @xmath1 cross section with various monte carlo models also used in cosmic - rays physics .
the goal of the first method @xcite is to count events with as loose selection as possible to detect the largest possible cross section which translates to the smallest possible extrapolation . in the event
counting , we required one reconstructed energy deposit in either side of the hf calorimeters with at least 5 gev total energy .
the possible signal events were triggered by two proton bunches entering cms and the background was estimated from the number of selected events triggered by a single bunch entering cms . with the hf detectors only , more than one inelastic interaction in the same bunch- crossing can not be separated , which means the need of low pile - up data ( @xmath2 ) for small pile - up correction factor .
using generator level monte carlo , the inelastic interactions can be characterized with the variable @xmath3 .
the final state particles are ordered in rapidity and the largest rapidity gap is used to assign the particles into two systems .
the invariant masses of the two systems are calculated and the higher mass system is called @xmath4 , then the variable @xmath3 is given by @xmath5 . in case of single diffractive events , @xmath3 is the fractional momentum loss of the scattered proton . studying the hf selection efficiency as a function of @xmath3 showed that events with small @xmath3 can escape detection . for @xmath6 ,
the efficiency of detection is more than @xmath7 .
the definition of the inelastic @xmath1 cross section with @xmath6 is @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the number of events selected by the hf calorimeters after subtracting the background , @xmath10 is the fraction of selected events that are low mass ( contamination ) , @xmath11 is the pile - up correction factor , @xmath12 is the integrated luminosity and @xmath13 is the efficiency to detect an inelastic event with @xmath6 , namely the fraction of high mass events that are selected .
the efficiency ( @xmath14 ) and contamination ( @xmath15 ) correction factors were determined from three monte carlo generators using the full detector simulation of cms : pythia 6 @xcite , pythia 8 @xcite and phojet @xcite . to calculate the pile - up correction factor ( @xmath11 ) an iterative method was used where the average number of collisions per bunch - crossing , the pile - up ( @xmath16 ) was measured from the data directly .
several low pile - up datasets were used to obtain the cross section .
the integrated luminosity values for these datasets were obtained on the basis of van der meer scans , which carry a 4% normalization uncertainty dominating the uncertainties in the present analyses .
the result of the analysis for events with @xmath17 is obtained by averaging the 5 gev hf threshold cross section values measured at different pile - up conditions .
the systematic uncertainties of the result take into account noisy tower exclusion , run - by - run luminosity variations , varying the hf energy threshold and the model dependence .
the final result for the inelastic @xmath1 cross section with @xmath17 : @xmath18
the second method @xcite is based on the assumption that the number of inelastic @xmath1 interactions in a given bunch crossing follows a poisson probability distribution : @xmath19 where @xmath20 is the bunch crossing luminosity and @xmath21 is the total inelastic @xmath1 cross section .
two data samples , an inclusive di - electron and a single muon , were collected with the cms triggers .
the specific trigger requirements are not important as long as their efficiencies do not depend on the instantaneous luminosity .
using these data samples the number of reconstructed vertices were counted in each bunch crossing in bins of luminosity .
every vertex had to fulfill the quality requirements to be counted as a visible vertex .
the quality requirements are the following : the transverse position of the vertex between @xmath22 cm , the minimum distance between two vertices 0.1 cm , @xmath23 where the @xmath24 are the quality of the tracks associated with the vertex , at least 2 , 3 or 4 tracks with @xmath25 mev/@xmath26 in @xmath27 associated with the vertex and each track should have at least 2 pixel and 5 strip hits . to obtain the true number of vertices from the visible number of vertices a bin - by - bin correction factor was applied using the full simulation of the cms detector accounting for vertex reconstruction efficiency , vertex merging and fakes .
after the corrections applied , the distributions of the fraction of pile - up events as a function of the single bunch luminosity for @xmath28 pile - up events are well fitted with a poisson distribution .
the 9 values of the cross section are fitted together to get the visible inelastic @xmath1 cross section .
the main sources of systematic uncertainties are the use of different datasets , change in the fit limits , the minimum distance between vertices , the vertex quality requirement and the application of an analytic method for the corrections .
the final results with at least 2 , 3 or 4 charged particles with @xmath27 and @xmath29 mev/@xmath26 of the visible inelastic @xmath1 cross section are the following : @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32
additional monte carlo models were used for the extrapolation from the different hadron level definitions of the cross section to the total inelastic @xmath1 cross section .
the considered models were pythia 6 @xcite , pythia 8 @xcite , phojet @xcite , epos 1.99 @xcite , sybill 2.1 @xcite , qgsjet 1 and qgsjet - ii @xcite which use different models / tunings for the hard parton - parton and for the diffractive scattering cross sections .
every model show a similar trend for the measured hadron level cross sections but there are substancial differences in the expextations for the total inelastic @xmath1 cross section . for the extrapolation from the inelastic @xmath1 cross section with @xmath17 to the total inelastic @xmath1 cross section all generators were considered except qgsjet 1 since this model used in cosmic - rays physics is only describing one of the hemispheres of the collision , which is not suitable for efficiency calculations when a single energy deposit in either one of the two hf calorimeters is required .
the final result of the first analysis is @xmath33 the extrapolation from the visible cross section with at least 2,3 or 4 charged particles with @xmath25 mev/@xmath26 and @xmath27 has been computed using only the models in agreement with the measured points ( not phojet or sybill ) .
the final result of the second analysis is @xmath34 rt0.6
cms measured the inelastic @xmath1 cross section at @xmath35 tev with two independent method using two different subdetectors . the results for the inelastic @xmath1 cross section with @xmath17 are in very good agreement with the result of the atlas collaboration in the same kinematic range @xcite .
the extrapolations to the total inelastic @xmath1 cross section rely entirely on the models and their description of the low mass region . within the large extrapolation uncertainties the results of cms presented here are in agreement with the results from atlas , alice and totem collaborations as shown in figure [ fig : summary ] .
the author wishes to thank to the hungarian scientific research fund ( k 81614 ) for support .
cms collaboration , cms physics analysis summary , * cms - pas - qcd-11 - 002 * https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1433413[cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1433413 ] t. sjostrand , s. mrenna and p. z. skands , jhep * 0605 * ( 2006 ) 026 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0603175[hep-ph/0603175 ] t. sjostrand , s. mrenna and p. z. skands , comput .
* 178 * ( 2008 ) 852 http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3820[arxiv:0710.3820 ] r. engel , j. ranft and s. roesler , phys .
d * 52 * ( 1995 ) 1459 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9502319[hep-ph/9502319 ] cms collaboration , cms physics analysis summary , * cms - pas - fwd-11 - 001 * https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1373466[cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1373466 ] k. werner , f. -m .
liu and t. pierog , phys .
c * 74 * ( 2006 ) 044902 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0506232[hep-ph/0506232 ] e. -j .
ahn , r. engel , t. k. gaisser , p. lipari and t. stanev , phys .
d * 80 * ( 2009 ) 094003 http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.4113[arxiv:0906.4113 ] s. ostapchenko , phys .
d * 83 * ( 2011 ) 014018 http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1869[arxiv:1010.1869 ] atlas collaboration , g. aad _ et al .
_ , nature commun .
* 2 * ( 2011 ) 46 http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.0326[arxiv:1104.0326 ] m. g. poghosyan , j. phys .
g g * 38 * ( 2011 ) 124044 http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4510[arxiv:1109.4510 ] g. antchev , p. aspell , i. atanassov , v. avati , j. baechler , v. berardi , m. berretti and e. bossini _ et al .
_ , europhys .
* 96 * ( 2011 ) 21002 http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.1395[arxiv:1110.1395 ] | cross sections of hadronic collisions important in high energy particle nuclear physics studied last 40 years mass two methods measuring inelastic proton - proton cross section with cms detector data in 2010 different luminosity pile - up conditions low pile - up data events hadron other method high luminosity data pile - up events poisson distribution measurements corrected to hadron level definitions inelastic @xmath1 cross section extrapolations performed to total inelastic @xmath1 cross section with monte carlo models goal first method count events with loose selection largest cross section smallest extrapolation required one reconstructed energy deposit in either side hf calorimeters with 5 gev total energy signal events triggered by two proton bunches entering cms background estimated from events single bunch entering hf detectors more than one inelastic interaction in bunch- crossing separated low pile - up data for small pile - up correction factor generator level monte carlo inelastic interactions characterized with variable @xmath3 final state particles ordered in rapidity largest rapidity gap particles into two systemsinvariant masses two systems calculated higher mass called @xmath4 variable @xmath3 @xmath5 diffractive events @xmath3 fractional momentum loss scattered proton hf selection efficiency @xmath3 events small @xmath3 escape detection @xmath6 efficiency detection more than @xmath7 inelastic @xmath1 cross section with @xmath6 is @xmath8 @xmath9 number events selected hf calorimeters @xmath10 fraction events low mass @xmath11 pile - up correction factor @xmath12 integrated luminosity @xmath13 efficiency detect inelastic event with @xmath6 high mass events efficiency @xmath14 contamination @xmath15 correction factors determined from three monte carlo generators pile - up correction factor @xmath11 iterative method average number collisions per pile - up @xmath16 measured from data low pile - up datasets used cross section integrated luminosity values obtained van der meer scans 4% normalization uncertainty analysis events @xmath17 averaging 5 gev hf threshold cross section values different pile - up conditionssystematic uncertainties noisy tower exclusion luminosity variations hf energy threshold model dependence final result inelastic @xmath1 cross section with @xmath17 : @xmath18 second method inelastic @xmath1 interactions bunch crossing follows poisson probability distribution @xmath19 @xmath20 bunch crossing luminosity @xmath21 total inelastic @xmath1 cross section two data samples inclusive di - electron single muon collected with cms triggers specific trigger requirements important efficiencies depend on instantaneous luminosity reconstructed vertices counted in each bunch crossing in bins luminosity vertex quality requirements quality requirements transverse position vertex between @xmath22 cm minimum distance between two vertices 0.1 cm @xmath23 2 3 4 tracks with @xmath25 @xmath27 each track 2 pixel 5 strip hits true number vertices bin - by - bin correction factor applied simulation cms detector vertex reconstruction efficiency merging distributions fraction pile - up events single bunch luminosity for @xmath28 fitted with poisson distribution 9 values cross section fitted visible inelastic @xmath1 cross sectionsources systematic uncertainties are datasets fit limits minimum distance between vertices vertex quality requirement analytic method for corrections final results with 2 3 4 charged particles with @xmath27 @xmath29 of inelastic @xmath1 cross section are additional monte carlo models used for extrapolation from to total inelastic @xmath1 cross section considered models were pythia 6 8 phojet epos 1.99 sybill 2.1 qgsjet 1 - ii different models for diffractive scattering cross sections similar trend for hadron level cross sections substancial differences in expextations for total inelastic @xmath1 cross section for extrapolation from inelastic @xmath1 cross section to total @xmath1 cross all generators considered except qgsjet 1 not suitable for efficiency calculations final result analysis is @xmath33 extrapolation from visible cross section with 2,3 or 4 charged particles with @xmath25 @xmath27 computed using models measured points not phojet or sybillfinal result second analysis @xmath34 rt0.6 cms measured inelastic @xmath1 cross section @xmath35 tev two subdetectors results inelastic @xmath1 cross section @xmath17 atlas collaboration kinematic range extrapolations inelastic @xmath1 cross section rely models low mass region large extrapolation uncertainties results cms agreement atlas alice totem collaborations figure author hungarian scientific research fund support cms collaboration analysis summary - - qcd-11 - 002 https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1433413 t. sjostrand s. mrenna p z skands 0605 2006 ) 026/hep-ph/0603175 sjostrand 178 2008 ) 852/abs/0710.3820 r. engel j. ranft s. roesler phys . * 52 * 1995 ) 1459/hep-ph/9502319 cms collaboration physics analysis summary cms - pas - fwd-11 - 001.cern.ch/record/1373466 k. werner f liu tpierog phys . 74 2006 ) 044902.org/abs/hep-ph/0506232 ahn engel gaisser. lipari. stanev phys . 80 2009 ) 094003/abs/0906.4113 ostapchenko . d 83 2011 ) 014018/abs/1010.1869:1010.1869 ] atlas collaboration aad nature commun . 2 2011 ) 46/abs/1104.0326 poghosyan . 38 * 2011 ) 124044/abs/1109.4510 g. antchev p. aspell. atanassov v. avati. baechler. berardi m. berretti. bossini europhys . 96 2011 ) 21002/abs/1110.1395:1110.1395 | 0.355324 | 2,530 | 1,272 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,606 | the e36 experiment recently conducted at j - parc by the trek collaboration will provide a precise mesurement of the decay ratio @xmath0 with the aim of testing lepton universality , a basic assumption of the standard model ( sm ) .
the sm prediction for the decay ratio @xmath1 is highly precise ( @xmath2 ) and any observed deviation from this prediction would clearly indicate the existence of new physics .
the e36 experimental apparatus , designed to offer small systematic errors , was installed at the j - parc k1.1br kaon beam line in the fall of 2014 , fully commissioned in the spring of 2015 , and the production data were collected in the fall of 2015 .
a scintillating fiber target was used to stop a beam of @xmath3 per spill .
the @xmath4 decay products were then momentum analyzed by a 12-sector superconducting toroidal spectrometer and charged particles were tracked with high precision by multi - wire proportional chambers ( mwpc ) combined with a photon calorimeter with a large solid angle ( 75% of @xmath5 ) and 3 different particle identification systems .
details of the e36 experimental apparatus , as well as the status of the data analysis will be presented . | high precision electroweak measurements have been used extensively to test the standard model ( sm ) predictions .
the sm successfully describes the results of most particle and nuclear physics experiments and it is believed that any deviation from its predictions would indicate the existence of new physics .
lepton universality being a key characteristics of the sm , the @xmath6 @xmath7 decay , which is the simplest leptonic decay among the @xmath8 decay channels , is therefore one of the best channels to perform such tests .
any violation of lepton universality clearly indicates the existence of new physics beyond the sm . by measuring the ratio of leptonic decay widths of the charged kaon , @xmath1 , defined as
@xmath9 the @xmath10 hadronic form factor cancels out and the sensitivity to new physics is greatly enhanced by the helicity suppression in @xmath11 .
the sm prediction can be determined with very high precision ( @xmath12 ) @xcite , giving a value of @xmath13 where @xmath14 is a radiative correction due the internal bremsstrahlung process ( ib ) which , by definition , contributes to @xmath1 ( unlike the structure dependent process ( sd ) ) . a minimal super - symmetric ( susy )
extension of the sm ( mssm ) with r - parity conservation has recently been considered as a candidate for new physics to be tested by @xmath1 @xcite . in the case of @xmath10 , in addition to the @xmath15 exchange , a charged higgs - mediated susy lepton flavor violating ( lfv ) contribution can be enhanced if accompanied by the emission of a @xmath16 neutrino .
this effect can be described as @xmath17 where @xmath18 is the mass of the charged higgs and @xmath19 ( @xmath20 ) is the term induced by the exchange of a bino and a slepton .
taking @xmath21 , @xmath22 and @xmath23 gev , would yield to a value of @xmath24 .
it is therefore possible to reach a contribution at the percent level due to possible lfv enhancements arising in susy models . + from ( a ) sm and ( b ) lfv susy .
a charged higgs - mediated lfv susy contribution can be strongly enhanced by the emission of a @xmath16 neutrino.,width=529 ] recent in - flight decay experiments , such as kloe @xcite and na62 @xcite , have measured the @xmath1 ratio leading to a current world average of @xmath25 .
the e36 experiment at the japan proton accelerator complex ( j - parc ) by the trek ( time reversal experiment with kaons ) collaboration aims to provide a competitive measurement of @xmath1 with different systematics .
the e36 experiment , which is part of the trek program at j - parc , was set up and fully commissioned at the k1.1br kaon beam line between fall 2014 and spring 2015 .
the data collection was completed by the end of 2015 using an upgraded version of the kek - ps e246 12-sector superconducting toroidal spectrometer @xcite used in a previous t - violation experiment at kek @xcite .
the incoming @xmath4 is tagged by the fitch cherenkov counter before stopping and decaying in the active target , which consists of 256 scintillating fibers ( @xmath26 mm@xmath27 ) oriented in the direction of the beam , providing a precise kaon stop location in the transverse plane . wrapped around the fiber target is a spiral fiber tracker ( sft ) , which consists of two pairs of scintillating fiber ribbons of opposite helicity bundled together around the target , providing the longitudinal coordinate of the outgoing decay particles @xcite .
this target+sft system is surrounded by 12 time - of - flight counters ( tof1 ) and 12 aerogel @xcite counters ( ac ) aligned with the 12 sectors of the toroidal spectrometer and forms the `` central detector '' .
+ a highy segmented ( 768 crystals ) large acceptance csi(tl ) photon calorimeter barrel covering about 75% of the total solid angle is used to identify and correct for structure dependent ( sd ) background events .
the calorimeter features 12 holes ( known as `` muon holes '' ) aligned with the sectors of the spectrometer allowing charged particles , such as @xmath28 , @xmath29 and @xmath30 , to be momentum analyzed by tracking with the multi - wire proportional chambers ( mwpc ) c2 , c3 and c4 . at the exit of each magnet sector ,
another set of fast scintillator detectors ( ttc and tof2 ) and lead glass counters ( pgc ) @xcite provides both trigger signals and @xmath31 particle identification .
three particle identification systems allow to redundantly distinguish between positrons , muons and pions .
the threshold aerogel cherenkov ( ac ) counters sensitive to positrons surround the target bundle , the time - of - flight ( tof ) is measured between scintillators near the target ( tof1 ) and in each gap ( tof2 ) , and lead glass counters ( pgc ) are located at the end of each gap to identify positrons by their shower .
+ the @xmath30 detection efficiency is estimated to be greater than 98% for the aerogel ( ac ) and the lead glass ( pgc ) counters and the mis - identification probability to be about 3% and 4% respectively .
the typical path length between tof1 and tof2 is about 250 cm and the time of flight is determined with a resolution of 200 ps ; the time difference between @xmath30 and @xmath32 at @xmath33 mev/@xmath34 along this path being approximately 500 ps .
+ figure 3 shows the particle momentum from tracking as a function of the adc pulse height for ac ( top left panel ) and for pgc ( top right panel ) .
the bottom left panel shows the momentum versus the squared mass from the time - of - flight analysis . after applying threshold cuts in ac and pgc adcs ,
the remaining events are shown in the bottom right panel where @xmath35 is suppressed , @xmath36 strongly reduced , and a clear separation between @xmath36 and @xmath37 events is observed .
the expected @xmath11 region is circled . + it is important to note that the analysis of the e36 experiment data is at an early stage and that these results are very preliminary .
refinements of the particle identification method are being implemented and further improvements are expected .
this work is supported in part by nserc and nrc in canada , the kaken - hi grants - in - aid for scientific research in japan , the doe and nsf in the us , and in russia by the ministry of science and technology .
9 cirigliano v and rosell i 2007 _ phys . rev . lett . _ * 99 * 231801 masiero a , paradisi p and petronzio r 2006 _ phys
_ d * 74 * 011701 masiero a , paradisi p and petronzio r 2008 jhep * 0811 * 042 girrbach j , nierste u 2012 [ arxiv:1202.4906 ] ambrosino f _ et al . _ ( kloe collaboration ) 2009 _ eur .
c * 64 * 627 lazzeroni c _ et al . _
( na62 collaboration ) 2013 _ phys . lett .
_ b * 719 * 326 macdonald j a _ et al . _ 2003 nucl .
instr .. and meth . a * 506 * 60 abe m _
( e246 collaboration ) 1999 _ phys .
lett . _ * 83 * 4253 abe m _
( e246 collaboration ) 2004 _ phys .
lett . _ * 93 * 131601 abe m _ et al . _
( e246 collaboration ) 2006 _ phys .
_ d * 73 * 072005 mineev o _
( trek collaboration ) the design and performance of a spiral fiber tracker for the j - parc e36 experiment [ arxiv:1607.00219 ] tabata m _
( trek collaboration ) 2015 _ nucl .
instr . and meth .
_ a * 795 * 206 miyazaki y _ et al . _
( trek collaboration ) 2015 _ nucl .
instr . and meth .
_ a * 779 * 206 | precision electroweak measurements used standard model sm predictions sm describes results particle nuclear physics experiments deviation new physics lepton universality key sm @xmath6 @xmath7 decay simplest leptonic decay best tests violation of lepton universality indicates new physics beyond sm measuring ratio of leptonic decay widths charged kaon @xmath9 @xmath10 hadronic form factor cancels out sensitivity to new physics enhanced by helicity suppression in @xmath11 sm prediction determined with high precision @xmath12 ) @xcite value of @xmath13 @xmath14 radiative correction due internal bremsstrahlung process contributes to @xmath1 minimal super - symmetric extension of sm with r - parity conservation candidate for new physics @xmath1 @xcite @xmath10 charged higgs - mediated susy lepton flavor violating contribution enhanced emission of @xmath16 neutrino effect described as @xmath17 @xmath18 is mass of charged higgs @xmath19 term induced by exchange of bino slepton@xmath21 gev yield value @xmath24 possible to reach contribution percent level due to lfv enhancements in susy models charged higgs - mediated lfv susy contribution enhanced by emission @xmath16 neutrino in - flight decay experiments kloe na62 measured @xmath1 ratio world average @xmath25 e36 experiment at japan proton accelerator complex j - parc trek collaboration competitive measurement @xmath1 systematics experiment trek program set commissioned at k1.1br kaon beam line fall 2014 spring 2015 data collection completed end of 2015 kek - ps e246 12-sector superconducting toroidal spectrometer @xcite incoming @xmath4 tagged by fitch cherenkov counter before stopping decaying in active target 256 scintillating fibers @xmath26@xmath27 ) oriented direction beam precise kaon stop location transverse plane around fiber target spiral fiber tracker two pairs scintillating fiber ribbons opposite helicity target longitudinal coordinate of outgoing decay particles @xcitetarget+sft system surrounded by 12 time - of - flight counters 12 aerogel @xcite counters aligned with 12 sectors toroidal spectrometer central detector highy segmented 768 crystals large acceptance csi photon calorimeter barrel 75% solid angle structure dependent background events calorimeter features 12 holes muon holes aligned with sectors spectrometer charged particles momentum analyzed with multi - wire proportional chambers c2 c3 c4 exit magnet sector fast scintillator detectors lead glass counters provides trigger signals @xmath31 particle identification three particle identification systems distinguish positrons muons pions threshold aerogel counters sensitive to positrons surround target bundle time - of - flight ) measured between scintillators lead glass counters at end gap identify positrons @xmath30 detection efficiency greater than 98% for lead glass mis - identification probability 3% and 4% typical path length between tof1 and tof2 250 cm time of flight determined with resolution 200 ps time difference between @xmath30 and @xmath32 at @xmath33 approximately 500 psfigure 3 shows particle momentum from tracking adc pulse height ac pgc right bottom left panel shows momentum versus squared mass from time - of - flight analysis after threshold cuts in ac pgc adcs remaining events bottom right panel @xmath35 suppressed @xmath36 reduced separation between @xmath36 @xmath37 events expected @xmath11 region circled analysis e36 experiment data early stage results preliminary refinements particle identification method implemented improvements expected work supported by nserc nrc kaken - hi grants japan doe nsf us russia ministry of science technology cirigliano v rosell i 2007 phys . rev lett 99 * 231801 masiero a paradisi p petronzio r 2006 74 * 011701 2008 0811 * 042 girrbach j nierste u 2012 arxiv:1202.4906 ambrosino f et al . collaboration ) 2009 64 * 627 lazzeroni c collaboration 2013 phys 719 * 326 macdonald j a 2003 506 * 60 abe e246 collaboration ) 1999 phys 83 * 4253 e246 collaboration 2004 93 * 131601 abee246 collaboration 2006 phys 73 072005 mineev trek collaboration design performance spiral fiber tracker j - parc e36 experiment arxiv:1607.00219 tabata trek collaboration 2015 nucl instr meth 795 206 miyazaki y trek collaboration 2015 nucl meth 779 206 | 0.310491 | 1,881 | 966 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,615 | several types of new - physics models predict the existence of light dark matter candidates and low - mass higgs states .
previous searches for invisible light - higgs decays have excluded large regions of model parameter space .
we present searches for a dark - sector higgs produced in association with a dark gauge boson and searches for a light higgs in @xmath0 decays . | we have now an overwhelming astrophysical evidence of dark matter . to explain this experimental evidence many theoretical models @xcite introducing new dark forces mediated by new gauge boson have been introduced .
these models propose weakly interacting massive particles ( wimps ) that can annihilate into pairs of dark bosons , which subsequently annihilate to lepton pairs ( protons are kinematically forbidden ) .
one of this model @xcite introduce a new dark sector that couples to the sm with a dark boson ( i.e. the dark photon @xmath1 ) through a small kinetic mixing term . thanks to their large luminosities and low - background environment
the @xmath2-factories offer an ideal place to probe for mev - gev dark matter , complementing searches from lhc .
the dark boson mass is generated via the higgs mechanism , adding a dark higgs boson ( @xmath3 ) to the theory .
the dark photon and the higgs bosons could have a comparable mass ( gev - scale ) .
a very minimal scenario has a single dark photon and a single dark higgs boson .
+ in the analysis @xcite we make use of the @xmath4 process @xmath5 using 521 @xmath6 .
the signal is either fully reconstructed into lepton or pion pair ( exclusively mode ) , or partially reconstructed ( inclusive mode ) .
only two of the three hidden photons are reconstructed in the latter case , and the four - momentum of the third one is identified to that of the recoiling system .
+ in these searches no significant signal is observed . using uniform priors in the cross section upper limits on the @xmath5 cross section
are obtained as a function of the hidden higgs and hidden photon masses . these limits on the cross section
are translated into 90 % upper limit on @xmath7 shown in fig .
[ fig:1 ] , where @xmath8 , @xmath9 is the dark sector gauge coupling , @xmath10 is the mixing strength .
values down to @xmath11 - @xmath12 are excluded for a large range of hidden photon and hidden higgs masses , assuming prompt decay .
assuming @xmath13 , limits on the mixing strength in the range @xmath14 - @xmath15 are derived as shown in fig .
[ fig:2 ] , these limits are an order of magnitude smaller than the current experimental bounds extracted from direct photon production in this mass range . for the dark photon ( left ) and
dark higgs ( right).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=50.0% ] for the dark photon ( left ) and dark higgs ( right).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=47.0% ] , for various higgs masses.,scaledwidth=50.0% ]
in recent years a number of theoretical models @xcite predicted for the existence of a light cp - odd higgs boson @xmath16 related to the next - to - minimal supersymmetric model ( nmssm ) .
direct searches constrain the mass of @xmath17 , where @xmath18 is the b quark and the decay of @xmath19 is forbidden .
of particular interest is to search the lightest cp - odd higgs boson in @xmath20 decays such as @xmath21 , where @xmath22 particles . in these @xmath23 transitions
low mass dark matter candidate ( @xmath24 ) can be also directly produced ( i.e. @xmath25 ) .
the large data sets available at experiment with more than 500 @xmath6 of data at the @xmath26 resonances and just below the @xmath27 resonance allow us to place stringent constraints on such theoretical models .
+ we searched for light higgs in using two - body - radiative decay on @xmath20 states .
the key experimental signature is the monochromatic photon in the cm frame @xmath28 . with this analysis technique
we searched for the following transitions : * @xmath29 @xcite * @xmath30@xcite * @xmath31@xcite in all the searches we did not find any evidence of signals but upper limits versus hypothesis mass have been extracted the results are shown in fig .
[ fig:3 ] for the @xmath32 , in fig .
[ fig:4 ] for the @xmath33 ( where @xmath34 is reconstructed both in @xmath35 and @xmath36 ) and in fig .
[ fig:5 ] for the @xmath37 . , ( b ) @xmath38,scaledwidth=47.0% ] and ( c ) effective coupling @xmath39 as a function of @xmath40 .
the shaded areas show the regions around the @xmath41 and the @xmath42 resonances excluded from the search .
[ fig:3 ] and ( right axis ) @xmath43 for ( a ) cp - all analysis and ( b ) cp - odd analysis.,scaledwidth=47.0% ]
we have searched for evidence of dark sector candidates and evidence of cp - odd light higgs in the @xmath44 and @xmath45 data sample at .
we did not observe any significant signal but more stringent limit have been set on space parameters of np model .
99 b. batell , m. pospelov and a. ritz , phys .
d * 79 * , 115008 ( 2009 ) n. arkani - hamed , d. p. finkbeiner , t. r. slatyer and n. weiner , phys .
d * 79 * , 015014 ( 2009 ) r. essig , p. schuster and n. toro , phys .
d * 80 * , 015003 ( 2009 ) arxiv:1202.1313 [ hep - ex ] ] r. dermisek , j. f. gunion and b. mcelrath , phys .
d * 76 * , 051105 ( 2007 ) b. aubert _ et al .
_ , phys .
lett . * 103 * , 081803 ( 2009 ) b. aubert _ et al .
_ , phys .
lett . * 103 * , 181801 ( 2009 ) j. p. lees _ et al .
_ , phys .
lett . * 107 * , 221803 ( 2011 ) | overwhelming astrophysical evidence of dark matter theoretical models introducing new dark forces new gauge boson introduced models propose interacting massive particles into dark bosons lepton pairs protons forbidden model new dark sector couples with dark boson dark photon @xmath1 small kinetic mixing term large luminosities low - background environment @xmath2-factories ideal probe for mev - gev dark matter complementing searches lhc dark boson mass generated via higgs mechanism adding dark higgs boson @xmath3 ) to theory photon higgs bosons comparable mass gev - scale minimal scenario single dark photon single dark higgs boson analysis @xmath4 process 521 @xmath6 signal reconstructed into lepton or pion pair or partially reconstructed two of three hidden photons reconstructed four - momentum third identified recoiling system no significant signal observed upper limits on @xmath5 cross section of hidden higgs photon masses limits translated into 90 % upper limit on @xmath7 in fig @xmath8 dark sector gauge coupling @xmath10 mixing strengthvalues @xmath11 - excluded for hidden photon higgs masses assuming prompt decay assuming @xmath13 limits on mixing strength in @xmath14 - @xmath15 derived in fig limits smaller than current experimental bounds from direct photon production dark photon higgs.0%% higgs masses theoretical models predicted light cp - odd higgs boson @xmath16 to supersymmetric model direct searches constrain mass of @xmath17 @xmath18 quark decay of @xmath19 forbidden search lightest cp - odd higgs boson in @xmath20 decays in @xmath23 transitions low mass dark matter candidate ( @xmath24 ) can directly produced @xmath25 large data sets 500 @xmath6 @xmath27 resonance stringent constraints on theoretical models searched for light higgs in two - body - radiative decay on @xmath20 states key experimental signature is monochromatic photon in cm frame @xmath28 analysis technique searched transitions @xmath29 evidence signals upper limits versus hypothesis mass extracted results shown fig @xmath32 @xmath33 reconstructed @xmath37 @xmath38% effective coupling @xmath39 @xmath40 shaded areas show @xmath41 @xmath42 resonances excluded search fig:3 @xmath43 cp - all cp - odd analysis,scaledwidth=47.0% searched dark sector candidates cp - odd light higgs in @xmath44 @xmath45 data sample significant signal stringent limit set on space parameters np model b. batell m. pospelov a. ritz phys . d * 79 * 115008 2009. arkani - hamed. finkbeiner slatyer n. weiner d * 79 * 015014 2009 r. essig p. schuster n. toro phys . d * 80 * 015003 ( 2009 ) arxiv:1202.1313 r. dermisek j f. gunion b. mcelrath phys . d * 76 * 051105 ( 2007 ) b. aubert phys . lett103 081803 2009 ) b. aubert . lett 103 181801 ( 2009 ) j p. lees . lett 107 221803 ( 2011 | 0.258028 | 1,409 | 697 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,617 | we report new results on the lattice regularization of the chiral schwinger model and the chiral u(1 ) model in four dimensions in the cfa . | the continuum fermion approach ( cfa ) to regularizing chiral fermions appears to be a promising method . for a summary of results obtained
so far see @xcite .
the basic idea of the approach is the following .
we start from a lattice with spacing @xmath0 .
we call this the original lattice . on this lattice
the simulations are done .
next we construct a finer lattice with lattice spacing @xmath1 , using a suitable interpolation of the gauge field @xcite . on this lattice
we formulate the fermions .
the action for a single fermion of chirality @xmath2 is taken to be @xmath3 where , restricting ourselves to gauge group u(1 ) , @xmath4 \nonumber \\ & \!\!\ !
\!\!\!&\times \;\psi(n \pm \hat{\mu } ) - \psi(n)\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath5 being the link variable on the fine lattice , @xmath6 the fractional charge , and @xmath7 .
the effective action is then computed from ( [ la ] ) in the limit @xmath8 , where @xmath0 is kept fixed .
hence the name continuum fermions .
a particular feature of this action or better of the wilson term we have chosen is that the wilson - dirac operator @xmath9 fulfills the ginsparg - wilson relation @xcite : @xmath10 this is not a great surprise .
the motivation behind our construction was to find an action which obeys the index theorem
what , in fact , it does as we shall see below .
the ginsparg - wilson relation ( [ gw ] ) does , however , not guarantee that the theory is invariant under chiral gauge transformations . indeed , the resulting effective action , @xmath11 , is not gauge invariant , even in the limit @xmath8 .
but there exists a local , purely bosonic counterterm @xmath12 , so that @xmath13 is invariant under chiral gauge transformations . for the imaginary part
this is only true in the anomaly - free model .
the counterterm can be and has been computed in perturbation theory . a further important feature of the action ( [ la ] )
is that it has a shift symmetry which makes sure that the ungauged fermion with chirality @xmath14 decouples . in the chiral schwinger model we found for the topologically trivial sector of the theory @xmath15 where @xmath16 and @xmath17 are the effective actions of the corresponding vector model and the free theory , respectively .
the imaginary part of the effective action turned out to be given by the harmonic part of the gauge field , i.e the toron field , alone , and it could be computed analytically from the gauge field we started with .
thus we arrived at an action which can be simulated relatively easily on the original lattice .
we believe to find a similar result in more realistic models in four dimensions .
after so much of introduction , let us now come to our new results .
our first results concern the chiral schwinger model . here
we want to test whether the index theorem is fulfilled .
this is a non - trivial task because any topologically non - trivial gauge field involves at least one singular plaquette .
some authors have argued that the cfa would fail this test .
this would be true had we employed the standard gauged or ungauged wilson terms . furthermore , we will investigate whether our approach reproduces the correct anomaly . in two dimensions
the index theorem says that in a background gauge field configuration of topological charge @xmath18 we should find exactly @xmath19 zero modes of chirality @xmath2 . for a configuration of ,
e.g. , charge @xmath20 this would mean @xmath21 and @xmath22 . to leading order in @xmath1
the wilson - dirac operator can be written @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the average of forward and backward derivatives .
being a finite matix , the dirac operator @xmath25 has the same number of zero modes as the corresponding vector operator , namely @xmath26 , thus violating the index theorem .
but the situation is different for the wilson term @xmath27 .
it has @xmath28 zero modes of chirality @xmath2 and none of chirality @xmath14 , exactly as required by the index theorem . for small , but
finite @xmath1 the zero modes approach the value @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the size of the original lattice .
we consider two configurations of charge @xmath18 .
we denote the link variables on the original lattice by @xmath31 , where @xmath32 are the lattice points on the original lattice .
the first configuration is @xcite ( @xmath33 ) @xmath34 where @xmath35 and @xmath36 .
the second configuration is @xmath37 where @xmath38 is the inverse lattice laplacian .
both configurations have constant field strength @xmath39 , zero toron field , and for @xmath40 they have one singular plaquette at @xmath41 .
the two configurations are related by a periodic ( topologically trivial ) gauge transformation . in the following
we shall take @xmath42 , and we shall use the interpolation given in @xcite .
both configurations give the same value for the effective action ( [ eff ] ) . as the anomaly - free model we took @xmath43 .
this indicates that we have gauge invariance in the background of singular gauge fields as well .
for @xmath44 we find exactly one zero mode with chirality @xmath45 , and none with chirality @xmath46 . for @xmath47
we find two zero modes with chirality @xmath45 , and none with chirality @xmath46 . for negative charges we find the same result but with @xmath45 and @xmath46 interchanged , in agreement with the index theorem .
the values of the zero modes are in good agreement with the analytical result ( [ zero ] ) .
a further requirement of the method is that it reproduces the correct anomaly . in the chiral schwinger model
the anomaly condition reads @xmath48 where @xmath49 is a gauge transformation .
we consider configuration ( [ vm ] ) with @xmath50 and @xmath51 now .
the r.h.s . of ( [ anomaly ] ) is known analytically .
the l.h.s .
is computed for @xmath52 , i.e. on the @xmath53 lattice . in fig .
1 we show the result for both sides separately for @xmath54 and @xmath55 , as well as for the anomaly - free model .
we find excellent agreement between our numerical results and the theoretical expectations ( i.e. the l.h.s . versus the r.h.s . ) .
moreover , we see that the anomaly cancels in the anomaly - free model .
we find similar results for configuration ( [ sv ] ) .
our other new results are on the chiral u(1 ) model in four dimensions . this model is simpler than the chiral schwinger model because it has no topological charge and zero modes to worry about .
the first question is again whether the theory exists at all , i.e. can be made finite by the addition of local counterterms .
we find three possible counterterms : @xmath56 as before , the coefficients , @xmath57 and @xmath58 , can be computed in lattice perturbation theory .
the result so far is @xmath59 we can not quote any number for @xmath58 yet .
numerically we find that gauge invariance is , within our present accuracy , already restored by the counterterms @xmath60 and @xmath61 , if we use the perturbative values ( [ ct ] ) for the coefficients .
this indicates that @xmath58 is very small , or zero . as an upper bound we can quote @xmath62 .
what distinguishes the chiral theory from the corresponding vector theory is the imaginary part , @xmath63 , of the effective action . in two dimensions this
was entirely determined by the toron field contribution . in four dimensions , however , we find that it is zero for toron field configurations .
this leaves the interesting possibility that the imaginary part of the effective action is generally zero in this model .
this work is supported in part by intas grant intas-96 - 370 .
discussions with m. gckeler about the ginsparg - wilson relation are gratefully acknowledged .
v. bornyakov , g. schierholz and a. thimm , in _ theory of elementary particles _ , proceedings of the 31st international symposium ahrenshoop , buckow , 1997 , p.265 ( wiley - vch , berlin , 1998 ) ( hep - lat/9805007 ) ; + v. bornyakov , g. schierholz and a. thimm , desy 98 - 065 ( 1998 ) , to appear in prog .
( hep - lat/9806010 ) . | continuum fermion approach ) regularizing chiral fermions promising method summary results see @xcite basic idea approach start from lattice spacing @xmath0 original lattice simulations done construct finer lattice spacing @xmath1 using suitable interpolation of gauge field @xcite lattice formulate fermions action for single fermion of chirality @xmath2 @xmath3 restricting to gauge group u(1 ) , @xmath4\psi{aligned with @xmath5 link variable fine lattice @xmath6 fractional charge @xmath7 effective action computed from ( la limit @xmath8 @xmath0 kept fixed hence name continuum fermions wilson - dirac operator @xmath9 fulfills ginsparg - wilson relation @xcite @xmath10 not surprise motivation construction find action obeys index theorem ginsparg - wilson relation not guarantee theory invariant under chiral gauge transformations resulting effective action @xmath11 not gauge invariant even in limit @xmath8 local bosonic counterterm @xmath12 @xmath13 invariant under chiral gauge transformations imaginary part true in anomaly - free model counterterm computed in perturbation theory action ( la ) has shift symmetry ungauged fermion with chirality @xmath14 decouples chiral schwinger model found topologically trivial sector theory @xmath15 @xmath16 and @xmath17 effective actions of vector model free theory imaginary part effective action given by harmonic part gauge field toron field computed analytically from gauge field action simulated easily on original lattice similar result in realistic models in four dimensions new results first results chiral schwinger model test index theorem fulfilled non - trivial task non - trivial gauge field involves one singular plaquette cfa fail test standard gauged ungauged wilson terms investigate approach reproduces correct anomaly index theorem says background gauge field configuration of topological charge @xmath18 find @xmath19 zero modes of chirality @xmath2 for configuration charge @xmath20 @xmath21 and @xmath22 leading order @xmath1 wilson - dirac operator written @xmath23 @xmath24 average forward backward derivatives finite matix dirac operator @xmath25 zero modes vector operator @xmath26 violating index theorem different wilson term @xmath27 zero modes chirality @xmath2 none @xmath14 required index theorem small finite @xmath1 zero modes approach value @xmath29 @xmath30 size original lattice two configurations charge @xmath18 link variables original lattice @xmath31 @xmath32 lattice points first configuration @xcite @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 second configuration @xmath37 @xmath38 inverse lattice laplacian configurations constant field strength zero toron field one singular plaquette @xmath41 configurations related periodic gauge transformation @xmath42 interpolation @xcite both configurations same value effective action eff anomaly - free model @xmath43 gauge invariance background singular gauge fields @xmath44 one zero mode chirality @xmath45 none @xmath46 @xmath47 two zero modes chirality @xmath45 none @xmath46negative charges same result @xmath45 @xmath46 interchanged agreement with index theorem values zero modes with analytical result [ zero ] requirement method reproduces correct anomaly chiral schwinger model anomaly condition reads @xmath48 @xmath49 gauge transformation consider configuration with @xmath50 @xmath51 r.h.s . of anomaly ] known analytically l.h.s . computed for @xmath52 @xmath53 lattice fig . 1 result for both sides @xmath54 @xmath55 anomaly - free model excellent agreement between numerical results theoretical expectations.h anomaly cancels in anomaly - free model similar results for configuration ( [ sv ] ) new results on chiral u(1 ) model in four dimensions model simpler no topological charge zero modes question theory exists finite by addition local counterterms three possible counterterms : @xmath56 coefficients @xmath57 @xmath58 computed in lattice perturbation theory result is @xmath59 quote number for @xmath58 gauge invariance restored by counterterms @xmath60 @xmath61 perturbative values ct for coefficientsindicates @xmath58 small zero upper quote @xmath62 distinguishes chiral theory vector theory imaginary part @xmath63 effective action two dimensions determined by toron field contribution four dimensions zero for toron field configurations possibility imaginary part action zero work supported by intas grant intas-96 - 370 discussions with m. gckeler ginsparg - wilson relation acknowledged v. bornyakov g. schierholz a. thimm theory elementary particles proceedings 31st international symposium 1997 p.265 wiley - berlin 1998 ) hep - lat/9805007 ) desy 98 - 065 1998 ) prog - lat/9806010 | 0.317482 | 1,983 | 1,027 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,625 | this article gives an overview of the recent searches and measurements of @xmath0 penguin transitions with the babar experiment .
the branching fraction of these decays in the standard model ( sm ) is expected to be a factor of 10 or more lower than the corresponding @xmath1 penguin transitions , but a deviation from the sm prediction would be an equally striking sign of new physics .
the exclusive decay @xmath2 is searched by babar with no excess over the background found .
the babar measurement of @xmath3 provides the first evidence of @xmath4 , is in good agreement with the previous belle results and provides a measurement of @xmath5 independent of the one from @xmath6 mixing .
no deviation from the sm is found . | since the first @xmath7 radiative penguin decays of b mesons have been reported by cleo in 1993 @xcite , the measurements of radiative penguins at the b factory experiments babar and belle have expanded into a rich field of physics .
as many as 15 individual exclusive @xmath1 modes have been observed and some of the corresponding branching fractions have been measured with a precision of about @xmath8 .
this makes it possible to test sm predictions of these rare decays , e.g. qcd calculations of form factors .
additionally , the inclusive measurement of @xmath9 allows strong constraints on new physics models @xcite and precision measurements of heavy quark effective theory predictions . with the success of the @xmath1 penguin measurements in hand ,
the next step is to explore @xmath0 penguins , which due to cabbibo suppression are not only about one order of magnitude more rare , but also face a much more severe background due to the abundance of pions in the background .
this paper gives an overview of the recent results from babar for the exclusive modes @xmath10 and @xmath3 .
section [ sec : newphysics ] will briefly discuss the interest in these measurements from the point of view of the search for new physics , sections [ sec : btodll ] and [ sec : btodg ] will summarize the measurements , an discuss the measurement of @xmath5 from @xmath11 .
( 20,15 ) ( 20,15 ) ( 20,15 ) the beauty of the search for new physics in penguin decays lies in the fact that the dominating diagram in the sm is a loop or box diagram with heavy particles in the loop .
this is exemplified in figure [ fig : newphysicsgraphs ] .
possible new physics , supersymmetry ( susy ) or the two - higgs doublet model ( 2hdm ) in this case , contribute with particles in the same mass range of 100 to several hundred gev and often also with similar couplings .
this allows strong constraints on new physics models .
however , while the measurement of exclusive decays is often experimentally clean , the interpretation of the experimental results for very rare exclusive decays often suffers from theoretical uncertainties in the prediction of form factors , radiative corrections , and other suppressed graphs .
still , strong constraints and precise sm measurements can be gained from ratios of branching fractions .
( 40,20 ) ( 40,20 ) the smallest @xmath13 branching fractions measured up to now are the @xmath14 modes @xmath15 and @xmath16 .
@xcite in comparison to that , @xmath17 is expected to be suppressed by @xmath18 , with the most recent prediction of @xmath19 . @xcite any deviation from this order of magnitude would be a striking sign of new physics . the two dominating diagrams for this transition are shown in figure [ fig : btodllpenguins ] , showing one penguin and one @xmath20 box diagram . + ( a )
+ ( b ) the babar analysis @xcite on a dataset of @xmath21 faces another experimental challenge with respect to @xmath22 in addition to the reduced branching fraction , namely the much higher rate of @xmath23 in the background than @xmath24 .
the analysis strategy is to first select clean @xmath23 , @xmath25 and @xmath26 candidates and then veto resonances decaying into @xmath27 .
the @xmath28 events are strongly reduced by requiring two @xmath29 gev leptons in the event . the charmonium veto against @xmath30 events
is shown in figure [ fig : btodllpeakingbackground ] ( a ) .
the tilt in the mass veto stems from the fact that events with bremsstrahlung of one of the leptons are off both in mass and in reconstructed energy , visible in @xmath31 .
event shape variables against continuum events are grouped in a fisher discriminant , and event shape variables against @xmath32 background events are grouped into a likelihood .
after these cuts , only combinatoric background from @xmath33 and @xmath32 events are left .
backgrounds are controlled with various control samples ( @xmath34 , @xmath35 ) .
hadronic mistags are measured in a separate study by inverting the hadron vetos and then imposing the measured mistag rates as event weights .
the resulting small peaking background fraction is shown in figure [ fig : btodllpeakingbackground ] ( b ) with @xmath36 on the left and @xmath37 on the right side .
finally , the background in the @xmath38 and @xmath39 sidebands is extrapolated into the signal region ( see figure [ fig : btodllresults ] ) to assess the background level independent of the mc simulation .
.__results of the @xmath10 selection and limits on the branching fraction inferred from the absence of an excess over the sm background . _ _ [ cols="<,^,^,^ " , ] no excess over the background is observed , hence limits are set using a frequentist cut - and - count method in the signal boxes . the resulting limit of @xmath19 assuming isospin symmetry is within a factor of 3 of the sm prediction . a detailed summary of the results can be found in table [ tab : btopillresults ] .
@xmath41 penguins have been first observed by belle with @xmath42 with evidence for the @xmath43 mode @xcite .
in addition to the possibility of finding new physics if the measured branching fractions exceed @xmath44 for the neutral mode or @xmath45 for the charged mode significantly , it offers the important possibility to measure @xmath5 via @xmath46 with @xmath47 @xcite containing radiative corrections and sub - dominant helicity suppressed @xmath20-fusion diagrams ( hence depending on @xmath48 and the ckm fit itself and thus not uncorrelated from @xmath5 ) , and a form - factor ratio of @xmath49 @xcite .
the graphs involved here are expected to have completely independent possible new physics contributions than @xmath50 , hence the comparison of the two results is very important . here
, the experimental challenge lies not only in the particle i d requirements to suppress @xmath24 background , but also in the @xmath23 combinatorics coming from the wide resonance states ( @xmath51 ) and the high photon background from continuum events with @xmath52 .
the babar analysis @xcite on @xmath53 of data tackles this challenge by a likelihood veto against @xmath54 based on the invariant mass of the photon pair and the energy of the lower energetic photon , improving the veto significantly over a simple cut on @xmath55 .
additionally , a neural net ( nn ) based continuum suppression is applied . to extract the result ,
a simultaneous maximum - likelihood fit is performed to @xmath56 , the nn output and @xmath57 , where @xmath58 is the helicity angle of the vector meson @xmath59 or @xmath60 , which are transversely polarized in signal events . for @xmath60 , the dalitz angle of the @xmath60 decay is used additionally .
an example fit is shown for the @xmath4 mode in figure [ fig : rhofit ] .
many control sample checks are performed . with off - peak data used to control the continuum simulation , and
@xmath61 and @xmath62 used to control resolutions and efficiencies .
lcc mode & result & significance + @xmath63 & @xmath64 & @xmath65 + @xmath66 & @xmath67 & @xmath68 + @xmath69 & @xmath70 & @xmath71 + + @xmath72 & @xmath73 & @xmath74 + the result for the individual modes and different combinations is shown in table [ tab : btorhogresults ] . while the @xmath75 signal is not yet significant on its own , this result represents the first evidence for @xmath76 .
figure [ fig : babarbellecomparison ] shows the good agreement of the results with the sm predictions and the agreement with the earlier belle results .
the result for the isospin combination @xmath77 is to be taken with care , however , since the @xmath60 does not belong to the isospin triplet .
the results of @xmath72 can be used to extract @xmath5 using eq .
[ eq : vtdvts ] . using the world average of @xmath78 ,
a value of @xmath79 @xcite can be extracted , in very good agreement with the result obtained from @xmath80 of @xmath81 from the tevatron @xcite .
while the precision from @xmath77 is not sufficient to compete with @xmath82 , it provides an important independent check of possible new physics , due to the different nature of the possible new physics contributions in the two processes .
a comparison of the two results with the ckm fit and the imposed constrained in the @xmath83 plane of the ckm parameterization can be found in fig .
[ fig : deltamvsbtorho ] .
with the extraordinary luminosities of the b - factories belle and babar , the field of strange radiative penguin decays of the b meson has evolved into one of the most important areas of precision measurements in the search of new physics .
while it is still unclear whether @xmath2 transitions will be seen in the lifetime of the present b - factories , the rare decay @xmath41 has now been seen by belle and babar , and these measurements will possibly evolve towards precision measurements in the same way as the @xmath9 decays before . with the anticipated @xmath84 of luminosity per b - factory at the end of 2008 , a @xmath85 measurement of the cp asymmetry in @xmath77 should be feasible .
another interesting measurement would be the isospin asymmetry @xmath86 , which presents a completely new way of obtaining a measurement of the ckm - angle @xmath87 , as outlined in @xcite and shown in fig .
[ fig : gammaai ] .
the author would like to thank the pep - ii accelerator and its crew for the excellent luminosity delivered to babar , and the radiative penguin analysis group in babar for lots of support and very lively discussions .
99 r. ammar _ et al . _ [ cleo collaboration ] , phys .
* 71 * ( 1993 ) 674 .
see e.g. m. misiak _ et al .
_ , phys .
* 98 * ( 2007 ) 022002 and references therein .
b. aubert _ et al . _ [ babar collaboration ] , phys .
d * 73 * ( 2006 ) 092001 .
t. m. aliev and m. savci , phys .
d * 60 * , 014005 ( 1999 ) .
b. aubert _ et al . _ [ babar collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0703018 , submitted to prl
. k. abe _ et al . _ [ belle collaboration ] , phys .
* 96 * ( 2006 ) 221601 .
a. ali , e. lunghi and a. y. parkhomenko , phys .
b * 595 * , 323 ( 2004 ) .
p. ball and r. zwicky , jhep * 0604 * , 046 ( 2006 ) .
b. aubert _ et al . _ [ babar collaboration ] , phys .
* 98 * ( 2007 ) 151802 .
p. ball , g. w. jones and r. zwicky , phys .
d * 75 * ( 2007 ) 054004 .
a. abulencia _ et al . _
[ cdf collaboration ] , phys .
lett . * 97 * , 242003 ( 2006 ) . | first @xmath7 radiative penguin decays reported by cleo in 1993 measurements at b factory experiments babar and belle expanded into field physics 15 exclusive @xmath1 modes observed branching fractions measured with precision of @xmath8 test sm predictions of rare decays qcd calculations of form factors inclusive measurement of @xmath9 allows constraints on new physics models precision measurements of heavy quark effective theory predictions success of @xmath1 penguin measurements next step to explore @xmath0 penguins due to cabbibo suppression one order more rare severe background due to abundance of pions paper recent results from babar for exclusive modes @xmath10 and @xmath3 newphysics measurements new physics summarize measurements measurement of @xmath5 from @xmath11 search for new physics in penguin decays dominating diagram is loop diagram with heavy particles in loop exemplified in figure possible new physics supersymmetry two - higgs doublet model contribute with particles in same mass range of 100 to hundred gev similar couplingsallows constraints on new physics models measurement of exclusive decays experimentally clean interpretation results for rare decays suffers theoretical uncertainties prediction form factors radiative corrections suppressed graphs constraints precise measurements from ratios branching fractions smallest @xmath13 branching fractions measured are @xmath14 modes @xmath17 expected suppressed by @xmath18 recent prediction @xmath19 deviation sign of new physics two dominating diagrams for transition shown in figure one penguin one @xmath20 box diagram analysis @xcite on dataset @xmath21 faces experimental challenge @xmath22 higher rate of @xmath23 in background than @xmath24 analysis strategy select clean @xmath23 candidates veto resonances decaying into @xmath27 @xmath28 events reduced requiring two @xmath29 gev leptons charmonium veto against @xmath30 events shown in figure tilt in mass veto stems from events with bremsstrahlung one leptons off in mass reconstructed energy visible in @xmath31event shape variables against continuum events grouped fisher discriminant against @xmath32 events likelihood after cuts combinatoric background from @xmath33 events left backgrounds controlled with control samples @xmath34 hadronic mistags measured inverting hadron vetos imposing rates as event weights small peaking background fraction shown in figure with @xmath36 left @xmath37 right background in @xmath38 @xmath39 sidebands extrapolated into signal region background level independent mc simulation of @xmath10 selection limits on branching fraction from absence excess over sm background no excess over background limits set using frequentist cut - and - count method in signal boxes limit of @xmath19 isospin symmetry within factor of 3 of sm prediction summary results in table @xmath41 penguins observed by with @xmath42 evidence for @xmath43 modenew physics if branching fractions exceed @xmath44 or measure @xmath5 @xmath46 @xmath47 @xcite radiative corrections sub - dominant helicity suppressed @xmath20-fusion diagrams @xmath48 ckm fit uncorrelated @xmath5 form - factor ratio @xmath49 @xcite graphs independent new physics contributions @xmath50 comparison important experimental challenge particle i d requirements suppress @xmath24 background @xmath23 combinatorics wide resonance states high photon background continuum events @xmath52 babar analysis @xcite @xmath53 likelihood veto against @xmath54 invariant mass photon pair energy lower energetic photon improving veto cut @xmath55 neural net nn ) based continuum suppression applied simultaneous maximum - likelihood fit to @xmath56 nn output @xmath57 @xmath58 helicity angle vector meson @xmath59 or @xmath60 transversely polarized signal events @xmath60 dalitz angle @xmath60 decay used example fit @xmath4 mode figure control sample checks performed off - peak data continuum simulation @xmath61 @xmath62 control resolutions efficiencieslcc mode result significance @xmath63 @xmath66 @xmath69 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 result for individual modes combinations shown in table btorhogresults @xmath75 signal not significant first evidence for @xmath76 figure babarbellecomparison shows agreement results with sm predictions earlier belle results result isospin combination @xmath77 taken care @xmath60 belong to isospin triplet results of @xmath72 extract @xmath5 using eq vtdvts world average of @xmath78 value of @xmath79 @xcite extracted agreement with result @xmath80 @xmath81 tevatron @xcite precision from @xmath77 not sufficient with @xmath82 provides important independent check of possible new physics different contributions processes comparison of results with ckm fit constrained @xmath83 plane ckm parameterization in fig . deltamvsbtorho extraordinary luminosities of b - factories belle babar field radiative penguin decays b meson important precision measurements search new physicsunclear @xmath2 transitions present b - factories rare decay @xmath41 seen by belle babar measurements evolve precision @xmath9 decays anticipated @xmath84 luminosity per b - factory end 2008 @xmath85 measurement cp asymmetry @xmath77 feasible interesting measurement isospin asymmetry @xmath86 new way ckm - angle @xmath87 outlined @xcite fig . author pep - ii accelerator crew luminosity babar radiative penguin analysis group support discussions. ammar cleo collaboration . 71 * ( 1993 ) 674 m. misiak phys . 98 * ( 2007 ) 022002 b. aubert babar collaboration phys . 73 * ( 2006 ) 092001 aliev m. savci phys . 60 014005 ( 1999 ) aubert babar collaboration arxiv hep - ex/0703018 k. abe belle collaboration phys . 96 * ( 2006 ) 221601 a. ali lunghi parkhomenko phys . 595 * 323 ( 2004 ) p. ball r. zwicky jhep * 0604 * 046 ( 2006 )aubert al babar collaboration . 98 2007 ) 151802 ball jones zwicky phys . 75 * 2007 ) 054004 abulencia al cdf collaboration . lett 97 242003 ( 2006 ) | 0.436593 | 2,658 | 1,350 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,631 | blazars are powerful , variable emitters from radio to gamma - ray wavelengths .
even though the general picture of synchrotron emission at low energies and inverse compton at the high energy end is well established , many important aspects of these remarkable objects are still not well understood .
for example , even the location of the gamma - ray emission region is still not clearly established , with some theories locating it close to the black hole / accretion disk while others place it at parsec scales in the radio jet . since mid-2007 we have carried out a large scale monitoring program at 15 ghz using the ovro 40 m telescope .
we are currently observing about 1700 blazars twice per week .
the sample includes all the _
fermi_-lat detected blazars north of declination @xmath0 .
here , we study the existence of correlated variability between these two bands for 86 sources bright enough to be detected weekly by lat .
the existence of correlated variability can be interpreted as an indication of a related spatial locations for the radio and gamma - ray emission , making the evaluation of its statistical significance a key goal of our program .
a study of the statistical significance of these cross - correlations is presented along with a discussion of the monte carlo simulations used to evaluate them .
more information about the conditions on the radio emission zone can be obtained through polarization monitoring which tells us about the configuration of the magnetic fields in this region . to study radio polarization variability we are building kupol , a radio polarization receiver for the 12 to 18 ghz band that will replace the current total power receiver at the ovro 40 meter telescope . | blazars are a type of active galactic nuclei with a jet oriented close to the line of sight .
their spectral energy distribution is broad and characterized by the presence of two peaks : a low energy one produced by the synchrotron mechanism , and a high energy one produced by inverse compton scattering of a photon field from the jet , accretion disk , the broad line region or the dust torus .
their emission is variable over a whole electromagnetic spectrum . due to these characteristics ,
a complete understanding of the emission mechanisms in blazars requires their study over a broad range of energies with simultaneous monitoring at different energy bands .
this monitoring needs to be independent of the state of the source to avoid biases .
moreover , understanding the statistical properties of different classes requires the study of large samples of objects .
even though the general picture of synchrotron emission at low energies and inverse compton at the high energy end is well established , many important aspects of these remarkable objects are still not well understood .
our work concerns one such question : where in the blazar structure is the gamma - ray emission region located ?
some theories locate it near the black hole / accretion disk @xcite , while others place parsecs away down the jet @xcite .
the _ fermi _ large area telescope ( lat ) and other gamma - ray telescopes lack the resolution needed to directly image the gamma - ray emission regions in blazars , but we can investigate their location by studying the connection between the radio and gamma - ray variability . to enable such studies , we are carrying out a blazar monitoring program with a sample size and cadence matched to _
fermi s _ capabilities .
this paper presents a summary of the state of this project as was presented at the time of the symposium .
a detailed discussion concerning the data analysis and results will be presented in max - moerbeck et al .
( in preparation ) .
we are currently monitoring about 1700 blazars including all the sources north of @xmath0 in declination in the candidate gamma - ray blazar sample @xcite and all _ fermi _ detected sources associated with blazars in the first and second lat agn catalogs @xcite with the same declination limit .
the sources are observed in total flux density twice per week at a frequency of 15 ghz with a 3 ghz bandwidth .
a typical observation has about 4 mjy of thermal noise with an additional @xmath1 uncertainty coming mostly from pointing errors .
a complete description of the program can be found in @xcite .
these observations complement the continuous monitoring of the gamma - ray sky in the band from 100 mev to 300 gev by _ fermi_-lat . in this study , we consider all the gamma - ray sources detected in at least 75% of the monthly time bins as reported in @xcite .
this sample contains 86 sources for which we obtain weekly binned gamma - ray light curves for integrated photon flux in the energy range from 100 mev to 200 gev covering the time period from 4 august 2008 through 8 august 2011 .
the radio light curves cover the period from 1 january 2008 through 26 february 2012 .
to study the physical significance of cross - correlation peaks we use monte carlo simulations that account for the uneven sampling and noise properties of the light curves .
the uneven sampling is incorporated using the discrete correlation function @xcite and the noise properties of the sources are characterized by fitting their power spectral density ( psd ) with a simple power law in both bands ( p@xmath2 ) using an adaptation of the method presented in @xcite . here
we present results of a study using populations values of the psd power law index at both bands . for the gamma - ray band
we adopt the average of the results obtained for the mean psd of the brightest bl lacs and fsrqs ( @xmath3 from @xcite ) . for the radio band we use the mean population value
we obtain in this work from fits to the radio light curves of the complete ovro monitored sample ( @xmath4 ) .
the significance of a cross - correlation peak is measured by obtaining an estimate of the distribution of random cross - correlation amplitudes at the given time lag .
this distribution is estimated by simulating a large number of independent time series ( we use 20,000 in this case ) with the appropriate power spectral densities and observational noise .
of the 86 sources with good cadence in radio and gamma - ray bands included in this study , only 63 show variability in both bands and are thus included in the cross - correlation analysis . among these 63
we find one case with @xmath5 significant correlations , j0238 + 1636 ( figure [ plots_j0238 + 1636 ] ; 0.2 cases are expected by chance ) .
there are 6 other cases with @xmath6 significant correlations ( 3 cases are expected by chance ) .
however , we consider five of these unreliable because of high noise or slow trends .
the remaining example , j1504 + 1029 , is shown in figure [ plots_j1504 + 1029 ] .
the well known blazar mrk 421 underwent a major gamma - ray flare in july 2012 @xcite which was followed by a major event at 15 ghz , the largest flare since at least 1980 as shown by a comparison to university of michigan radio astronomy observatory 14.5 ghz data @xcite .
when we extend the light curves to include the flaring period we are able to constrain the power spectral density in both bands and find correlated variability with @xmath6 significance .
preliminary light curves and results of the significance analysis including only the rising part of the radio flare are shown in figure [ plots_mrk421 ] .
this result has to be considered with care as in this case we are extending the period analyzed after observing the flare , thus doing a posteriori " statistics .
blazars produce their radio emission by the synchrotron mechanism which can result in polarized emission .
variations in the polarization can help us understand the evolution of the magnetic fields in the emission regions and its relation to high - energy emission . to study these magnetic fields
we are building a new receiver which will also measure linear polarization in the ku - band .
this new receiver , which we call kupol , will cover the band from 12 ghz to 18 ghz with 16 mhz spectral resolution , which can be used for examining spectral indices and removal of radio frequency interference .
this will be an important addition to our program and commissioning is planned for spring 2013 .
we study the connection between radio and gamma - ray emission in _ fermi _ detected blazars and find that significant correlations are present in a small number of these sources with the current data set .
the major flare on mrk 421 shows correlated radio / gamma - ray activity .
these cases add support to the idea that radio and gamma - rays are produced in related regions for some sources , but more data are needed to test whether this holds for the entire population . in particular longer radio and gamma - ray light curves will allow us to probe the variability on different time scales , and to incorporate information for multiple flaring periods .
this will improve the statistics and the significance of possible correlations .
we thank russ keeney for his efforts in support of observations at ovro .
the ovro 40 m monitoring program is supported in part by nasa grants nnx08aw31 g and nnx11a043 g , and nsf grants ast-0808050 and ast-1109911 .
t.h . was supported by the jenny and antti wihuri foundation .
support from mpifr for upgrading the ovro 40 m telescope receiver is also acknowledged . | blazars are active galactic nuclei jet oriented close to line sight spectral energy distribution broad two peaks low energy synchrotron high energy inverse compton emission variable over electromagnetic spectrum understanding emission mechanisms requires study over broad range energies monitoring at different energy bands monitoring independent of state source avoid biases understanding statistical properties of classes requires study large samples synchrotron emission at low inverse compton at high energy established important aspects not understood work concerns blazar structure gamma - ray emission region ? some theories near black hole / accretion disk @xcite others parsecs away down jet @xcite _ fermi _ large area telescope other gamma - ray telescopes lack resolution to image gamma - ray emission regions in can investigate location by studying connection between radio gamma - ray variability blazar monitoring program with sample size cadence matched to _ fermi s _ capabilities paper presents summary of state project symposium detailed discussion data analysis results presented in max - moerbeck et al .monitoring 1700 blazars sources north of @xmath0 candidate gamma - ray sample @xcite _ fermi _ detected sources first second lat agn same declination limit sources observed flux density twice per week frequency 15 ghz 3 ghz bandwidth typical observation 4 mjy thermal noise additional @xmath1 uncertainty from pointing errors description program in @xcite observations complement monitoring gamma - ray sky 100 mev to 300 gev fermi_-lat gamma - ray sources in 75% monthly time bins @xcite sample contains 86 sources weekly gamma - ray light curves flux 100 mev to 200 gev 4 august 2008 through 8 august 2011 radio light curves 1 january 2008 through 26 february 2012 cross - correlation peaks monte carlo simulations uneven sampling noise properties light curves uneven sampling incorporated discrete correlation function @xcite noise properties power spectral density simple power law both bands results study using values psd power law index both bands gamma average results mean psd of brightest bl lacs fsrqs @xmath3 @xciteradio band use mean population value radio light curves ovro monitored sample significance cross - correlation peak measured distribution random cross - correlation amplitudes time lag distribution estimated simulating independent time series 20,000 power spectral densities observational noise 86 sources good cadence radio gamma - ray bands 63 show variability both bands included cross - correlation analysis one case @xmath5 significant correlations j0238 + 1636 0.2 cases chance 6 cases @xmath6 significant correlations 3 cases expected by chance five unreliable high noise slow trends remaining example j1504 + 1029 shown figure blazar mrk 421 major gamma - ray flare july 2012 followed major event at 15 ghz largest flare since 1980 university of michigan radio astronomy observatory 14.5 ghz data extend light curves include flaring period constrain power spectral density both bands find correlated variability with @xmath6 significance preliminary light curves results significance analysis rising part radio flare shown figure [ plots_mrk421 ] extending period after flare a posteriori statistics blazars produce radio emission synchrotron mechanism polarized emissionvariations polarization evolution magnetic fields relation to high - energy emission building new receiver polarization ku - band kupol band 12 ghz to 18 ghz 16 mhz spectral resolution examining spectral indices removal radio frequency interference important addition program commissioning spring 2013 connection radio gamma - ray emission in blazars significant correlations in small number sources with current data set major flare on mrk 421 shows correlated radio gamma - ray activity radio gamma - rays produced in related regions more data needed entire population longer radio gamma - ray light curves probe variability on different time scales incorporate information for multiple flaring periods improve statistics significance correlations thank russ keeney observations at ovro ovro 40 m monitoring program supported by nasa grants nsf grants supported by jenny and antti wihuri foundation support from mpifr for upgrading ovro 40 m telescope receiver acknowledged | 0.270383 | 1,659 | 821 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,634 | the daya bay , reno , and double chooz experiments have discovered a large non - zero value for @xmath0 .
we present a global analysis that includes these three experiments , chooz , the super - k atmospheric data , and the @xmath1 t2k and minos experiments that are sensitive to the hierarchy and the sign of @xmath0 .
we report preliminary results in which we fix the mixing parameters other than @xmath0 to those from a recent global analysis .
given there is no evidence for a non - zero cp violation , we assume @xmath2 .
t2k and minos lie in a region of @xmath3 where there is a hierarchy degeneracy in the limit of @xmath4 and no matter interaction . for non - zero @xmath0 , the symmetry is partially broken , but a degeneracy under the simultaneous exchange of both hierarchy and the sign of @xmath0 remains .
matter effects break this symmetry such that the positions of the peaks in the oscillation probabilities maintain the two - fold symmetry , while the magnitude of the oscillations is sensitive to the hierarchy .
this renders t2k and no@xmath5a , with different baselines and different matter effects , better able in combination to distinguish the hierarchy and the sign of @xmath0 .
the present t2k and minos data do not distinguish between hierarchies or the sign of @xmath0 , but the large value of @xmath0 yields effects from atmospheric data that do .
we find for normal hierarchy , positive @xmath0 , @xmath6 and is 0.2% probable it is the correct combination ; for normal hierarchy , negative @xmath0 , @xmath7 and is 2.2% probable ; for inverse hierarchy , positive @xmath0 , @xmath8 and is 7.1% probable ; for inverse hierarchy , negative @xmath0 , @xmath9 and is 90.5% probable , results that are inconsistent with two similar analyses . | neutrinos undergo the phenomenon of flavor oscillations ; a neutrino created in a particular flavor ( electron , mu , or tau ) will change its flavor , a phenomenon not accounted for in the standard model of the electroweak interaction .
a possible explanation of this behavior is neutrino oscillations .
the neutrinos are assigned masses .
the created neutrino has definite flavor , but these flavor eigenstates are not the physical free particles , the mass states .
this leads to a phenomenology that is parameterized by three mixing angles , a cp violating phase , and two mass - squared differences , @xmath10 .
@xmath11to appear in horizons of innovative theories , experiments , and supercomputing in nuclear physics ( new orleans , june 4 - 6 , 2012 ) experiments have found that neutrino oscillations approximately break into two @xmath12 oscillations , termed solar and atmospheric oscillations .
the solar oscillations are predominantly governed by the solar data and the kamland experiment , and they predominantly determine @xmath13 and @xmath14 , while the atmospheric oscillation parameters @xmath15 and @xmath16 are predominantly determined by the atmospheric data and the long - baseline muon disappearance data .
the last mixing angle @xmath0 and the cp - violating phase @xmath17 mix the two @xmath12 oscillations .
an outstanding question in neutrino phenomenology is that of the hierarchy , whether the small mass - squared difference lies below ( normal hierarchy ) or above ( inverse hierarchy ) the large mass - squared difference . a related question , as we will show , is whether the value of @xmath0 is positive or negative .
we utilize the convention @xcite that @xmath18 and @xmath19 .
this is the more convenient parameterization for discussing the symmetries of interest here .
recent long - baseline reactor experiments @xcite have accurately measured the value of @xmath0 and found it to be large , @xmath20 . before these measurements
, the world s data demonstrated very little preference for either the hierarchy or the sign of @xmath0 @xcite .
the goal of this work is to examine the effect that the recent knowledge of @xmath0 has on the hierarchy question and on the sign of @xmath0 .
this report is preliminary in that we will fix the mixing parameters except @xmath0 at values from a recent analysis .
since there is no strong evidence for cp - violation , we set the cp phase @xmath17 to zero . in vacuum versus neutrino energy for the t2k experiment .
the solid curve depicts the normal hierarchy , positive @xmath0 as well as the inverse hierarchy , negative @xmath0 results .
the dashed curve depicts the normal hierarchy , negative @xmath0 as well as the inverse hierarchy , positive @xmath0 results .
the horizontal bar represents the range where the muon interaction rate is greater than 50% of its maximum .
, width=288 ] [ fig1 ]
the task of extracting neutrino mixing parameters from data is complicated by the existence of symmetries that lead to degeneracies @xcite , where degeneracies mean different mixing parameters yield the same oscillation probability .
the minos @xcite , t2k @xcite , and the future no@xmath5a @xcite experiments are at an @xmath3 where such a symmetry nearly exists . in the limit of @xmath21 and
no matter effects , these experiments would be insensitive to the hierarchy .
the symmetry pertinent to these experiments , using our bounds on the mixing angles , is the combined interchange of hierarchy and a change of the sign of @xmath0 , a four - fold degeneracy . in fig .
[ fig1 ] we depict the vacuum oscillation probability @xmath22 for the t2k experiment for full three - neutrino mixing using the parameters @xcite @xmath23 ev@xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 ev@xmath24 , @xmath27 , and @xmath28 . versus neutrino energy for the t2k experiment , left , and the minos / no@xmath5a experiments , right .
the blue curves depict the normal hierarchy , the red curves the inverse hierarchy .
the solid curves depict positive @xmath0 , the dashed curves negative @xmath0 . for the left curve , the horizontal brown bar represents the range where the muon interaction rate is greater than 50% of its maximum , while for the right curve the brown bar represents the same quantity for the no@xmath5a experiment , and the turquoise bar represents the minos experiment . ,
title="fig:",width=288 ] versus neutrino energy for the t2k experiment , left , and the minos / no@xmath5a experiments , right .
the blue curves depict the normal hierarchy , the red curves the inverse hierarchy .
the solid curves depict positive @xmath0 , the dashed curves negative @xmath0 . for the left curve ,
the horizontal brown bar represents the range where the muon interaction rate is greater than 50% of its maximum , while for the right curve the brown bar represents the same quantity for the no@xmath5a experiment , and the turquoise bar represents the minos experiment .
, title="fig:",width=288 ] versus @xmath29 for t2k , left , and minos , right .
solid curves are normal hierarchy , dashed inverse hierarchy .
blue curves are positive @xmath0 , red curves negative @xmath0.,title="fig:",width=288 ] versus @xmath29 for t2k , left , and minos , right .
solid curves are normal hierarchy , dashed inverse hierarchy .
blue curves are positive @xmath0 , red curves negative @xmath0.,title="fig:",width=288 ] we see that the four - fold degeneracy is broken by non - zero @xmath0 .
however , the solid curve represents both the normal hierarchy , positive @xmath0 as well as the inverted hierarchy , negative @xmath0 results while the dashed curve represents the inverted hierarchy , positive @xmath0 and the normal hierarchy , negative @xmath0 results .
thus non - zero @xmath0 breaks the four fold degeneracy down to two two - fold degeneracies .
hierarchy and linear in @xmath0 effects require interference between the two mass - squared difference terms , and this is the smallest value of @xmath3 where such effects appear .
these effects are greatest at the peak of the first oscillation generated by the small solar mass - squared differences . for vacuum oscillations
this occurs @xcite when @xmath30 km / gev . including matter effects yields @xmath31 km and @xmath32 gev as typical ideal values . extrapolating from the results in ref .
@xcite to the now known value of @xmath0 gives a large @xmath22 with a 20% difference between @xmath22 for @xmath2 and @xmath33 for such an experiment .
we present in fig .
[ fig2 ] the @xmath22 verses neutrino energy including the msw matter effects for t2k @xcite and minos
@xcite/ no@xmath5a @xcite .
the effect of including the matter interaction of the neutrino is to alter the magnitude of the oscillations while leaving the position of the peaks nearly unchanged .
thus spectral information that measures the position of the peaks maintains approximately the two - fold degeneracy of the vacuum oscillations .
the magnitude of the signal then breaks this symmetry to distinguish the hierarchy while it alone does not distinguish well the sign of @xmath0 .
there is a complementarity between the t2k and no@xmath5a experiments .
t2k is situated to determine the peak of the oscillation probability , ideal for breaking the four - fold degeneracy .
no@xmath5a has the longer baseline and the larger matter effects thus increasing the difference in the magnitude of the oscillations , giving it the greater sensitivity to the hierarchy .
.results for t2k , minos , and the combination . for the four cases of hierarchy and the sign of @xmath0 , we present the best fit values of @xmath34 , its 90% error bars , the maximum confidence level at which @xmath35 , and the probability that each case is the correct choice . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ]
we present our results for an analysis that includes all the experiments in fig .
[ fig5 ] where we show @xmath36 for the four cases of hierarchy and sign of @xmath0 .
the location of the minima are found to be only slightly affected by the choice of hierarchy or sign of @xmath0 . for the now known value of @xmath37 , atmospheric data distinguish between hierarchy and the sign of @xmath0 at a not negligible level .
the normal hierarchy , positive @xmath0 case is disfavored , while the inverse hierarchy , negative @xmath0 case is favored with the other two cases lying in the middle .
this is made quantitative in table [ tab3 ] . by marginalizing over @xmath38
we calculated the relative probability of each of the four cases .
the probability that normal hierarchy , positive @xmath0 is correct is 0.2% , a fairly strong indication that it is not correct . the inverse hierarchy , negative @xmath0 case is 90.5% probable that it is correct , a not negligible preference , while the normal hierarchy , negative @xmath0 and the inverse hierarchy , positive @xmath0 cases are 2.2% and 7.1% probable , respectively .
we compare our best fit value @xmath39 for negative hierarchy , negative @xmath0 to @xmath40 found for normal hierarchy , positive @xmath0 or negative hierarchy , negative @xmath0 from ref .
@xcite and to @xmath41 found for positive or negative hierarchy and negative @xmath0 for ref .
there is disagreement on the sign of @xmath0 and the hierarchy question .
we find a larger hierarchy difference than do the other two .
since the present t2k and minos experiments have little preference for the hierarchy and the sign of @xmath0 , the differences between the analyses arise from the atmospheric analysis .
these differences may be resolved by future super - k atmospheric data .
although the super - k data is statistically significant on the whole , the role of @xmath0 in the analysis is a small effect . for example
, the bins that indicate the presence or absence of the msw resonance , are statistically not too significant .
further , t2k and no@xmath5a have not produced data of statistical significance . with the large value for @xmath0 their future data
has great promise to help resolve this situation .
the work of d.j.e . is supported , in part , by us department of energy grant no .
de - fg02 - 96er40975 , the work of b.k.c .
is supported , in part , by us department of education grant no .
p200a090275 , and the work of j.e - r . is supported , in part , by conacyt , mexico .
10 latimer d c and ernst d j 2005 _ phys . rev .
_ d * 71 * 017301 abe y _
[ double - chooz collaboration ] 2012 _ phys .
lett . _ * 108 * 131801 an f p _ et al . _ [ daya bay collaboration ] 2012 _ phys .
lett . _ * 108 * 171803 ahn j _
[ reno collaboration ] 2012 _ phys .
lett . _ * 108 * 191802 escamilla - roa j , latimer d c and ernst d j 2010 _ phys .
_ c 82 028501 ; roa j e , latimer d c and ernst d j 2009 phys .
* 103 * 061804 barger v , marfatia d and wisnant k 2002 _ phys .
_ d * 65 * 073023 ; latimer d c and ernst d j 2005 _ mod .
lett . _ a * 20 * 1663 adamson p _
[ minos collaboration ] 2012 _ .
lett . _ * 108 * 191801 abe k _
[ t2k collaboration ] 2011 _ phys .
lett . _ * 107 * 041801 nowak [ no@xmath5a collaboration ] 2012 _ aip conf .
proc . _ * 1441 * 423 forereo d v , tortla m and valle j w f 2012 arxiv:1205.4018 [ hep - ph ] latimer d c and ernst d j 2005 _ phys .
_ c * 71 * 062501 latimer d c , escamilla j and ernst d j 2007 _ phs .
_ c * 76 * 05502 hagiwara k , okamura n and sendai k - k 2011 _ jhep _ * 1109 * 082 hunter h r , cogswell b k , escamilla - roa j , latimer d c and ernst d j , 2012 _ phys .
_ c * 85 * 068501 apollonio m _
_ 2003 _ eur .
_ c * 27 * 331 mueller th a _ et al .
_ 2011 _ phys .
_ c * 83 * 054615 hosaka j _ et al . _
[ super - k collaboration ] 2006 _ phys .
_ d * 74 * 032002 fogli g l , lisi e , marrone a , palazzo a and rotunno a , 2006 _ prog . part .
. phys _ * 57 * 742 fogli g , lisi e , marrone a , montanino d and palazzo a 2012 arxiv:1205;5254 [ hep - ph ] | neutrinos undergo flavor oscillations created in particular flavor flavor not in standard model electroweak interaction possible explanation is neutrino oscillations neutrinos assigned masses created neutrino has flavor flavor eigenstates not physical free particles mass states leads to parameterized by three mixing angles cp violating phase two mass - squared differences @xmath10 @xmath11to neutrino oscillations break into two @xmath12 oscillations solar and atmospheric oscillations solar oscillations governed by solar data kamland experiment determine @xmath13 and @xmath14 atmospheric oscillation parameters @xmath15 and @xmath16 determined by atmospheric data long - baseline muon disappearance data last mixing angle @xmath0 cp - violating phase @xmath17 mix two @xmath12 oscillations question small mass - squared difference below or related question value of @xmath0 positive or negative utilize convention @xcite @xmath18 and @xmath19 convenient parameterization for discussing symmetrieslong baseline reactor experiments measured value @xmath0 found large , @xmath20 before measurements data little preference for hierarchy or sign of @xmath0 goal work examine effect recent knowledge @xmath0 on hierarchy sign report preliminary fix mixing parameters except @xmath0 at values recent analysis no evidence for cp - violation set cp phase @xmath17 to zero vacuum versus neutrino energy for t2k experiment solid curve depicts normal hierarchy positive inverse negative results dashed curve normal negative positive horizontal bar represents range where muon interaction rate greater than 50% maximum extracting neutrino mixing parameters complicated by symmetries to degeneracies different parameters same oscillation probability minos t2k future no@xmath5a @xcite experiments at @xmath3 where symmetry nearly exists in limit of @xmath21 no effects experiments insensitive to hierarchy symmetry pertinent to experiments combined interchange of hierarchy change of sign of @xmath0 four - fold degeneracy fig fig1 vacuum oscillation probability @xmath22 t2k experiment full three - neutrino mixing parameters @xcite @xmath23 versus neutrino energy t2k experiment minos / no@xmath5a experiments blue curves normal red curves inverse solid curves positive dashed curves negative left curve horizontal brown bar range muon interaction rate greater than 50% maximum right curve brown bar same quantity no@xmath5a turquoise bar minos experiment versus neutrino energy t2k experiment left minos / no@xmath5a experiments blue curves normal red curves inverse solid curves positive dashed curves negative left curve horizontal brown bar range muon interaction rate greater than 50% maximum right curve brown bar same quantity no@xmath5a experiment turquoise bar minos experiment versus @xmath29 t2k left minos right solid curves normal hierarchy dashed inverse hierarchy blue curves positive @xmath0 red curves negative @xmath0 versus @xmath29 t2k left minos rightsolid curves normal dashed inverse blue positive @xmath0 red negative four - fold degeneracy broken by non - zero @xmath0 solid curve represents normal positive inverted negative dashed curve inverted positive negative non - zero @xmath0 breaks four fold degeneracy to two two - fold degeneracies hierarchy linear @xmath0 effects require interference mass - squared difference terms smallest value @xmath3 effects appear effects greatest peak first oscillation small solar mass - squared differences vacuum oscillations occurs @xcite @xmath30 km / gev matter effects yields @xmath31 km @xmath32 gev ideal values extrapolating results @xmath0 large @xmath22 20% difference between @xmath22 @xmath2 @xmath33 fig . @xmath22 verses neutrino energy msw matter effects t2k @xcite@xmath5a matter interaction neutrino magnitude oscillations position peaks unchanged spectral information position peaks maintains two - fold degeneracy vacuum oscillations magnitude signal breaks symmetry distinguish hierarchy distinguish sign @xmath0complementarity between t2k no@xmath5a experiments t2k peak oscillation probability ideal for breaking four - fold degeneracy no@xmath5a longer baseline larger matter effects difference magnitude oscillations greater sensitivity to hierarchy.results for t2k minos combination four cases of hierarchy sign @xmath0 best fit values of @xmath34 90% error bars maximum confidence level @xmath35 probability correct results analysis experiments in fig @xmath36 for four cases hierarchy sign @xmath0 location minima slightly affected by hierarchy sign @xmath0 value @xmath37 atmospheric data distinguish between hierarchy sign @xmath0 not negligible normal hierarchy positive @xmath0 case disfavored inverse hierarchy negative @xmath0 favored other two cases middle quantitative table marginalizing over @xmath38 calculated relative probability of each four cases probability normal hierarchy positive @xmath0 correct is 0.2% indication inverse hierarchy negative @xmath0 case 90.5% probable correct not negligible preference normal hierarchy negative @xmath0 inverse hierarchy positive @xmath0 cases 2.2% 7.1% probable compare best fit value @xmath39 negative hierarchy @xmath0 @xmath40 normal hierarchy positive @xmath0 negative hierarchy @xmath0 @xcite @xmath41 positive negative hierarchy negative @xmath0 disagreement sign @xmath0 hierarchy larger hierarchy difference present t2k minos experiments little preference hierarchy sign @xmath0 differences atmospheric analysis differences resolved future super - k atmospheric data super - k data statistically significant role @xmath0 small bins presence absence msw resonance statistically not significant t2k no@xmath5a not produced data statistical significance large value @xmath0 future data resolve work d.j.e . supported department energy grant de - fg02 - 96er40975 b.k.c . department education grant p200a090275 j.e - r . conacyt mexico latimer d c ernst d j 2005 . rev. * 71 017301 double - chooz collaboration 2012 . lett108 * 131801 an f p daya bay collaboration 2012 171803 ahn j reno collaboration 2012 108 191802 escamilla - roa j latimer ernst d j 2010 028501 roa latimer ernst 2009 103 * 061804 barger marfatia wisnant k 2002 65 * 073023 latimer ernst d j 2005 20 * 1663 adamson p minos collaboration 2012 108 * 191801 abe k t2k collaboration 2011 107 * 041801 nowak@xmath5a collaboration 2012 1441 * 423 forereo d tortla m valle j w 2012 arxiv:1205.4018 latimer d c ernst d j 2005 71 * 062501 latimer d escamilla j ernst d j 2007 76 * 05502 hagiwara k okamura sendai k 2011 1109 * 082 hunter h cogswell b escamilla - roa j latimer ernst d j 2012 85 * 068501 apollonio m 2003 27 * 331 mueller th 2011 83 * 054615 hosaka j super - k collaboration 2006 74 * 032002 fogli g lisi marrone palazzo rotunno 2006phys 57 fogli marrone montanino palazzo 2012 arxiv:1205;5254 hep ph | 0.499616 | 3,047 | 1,573 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,642 | we consider the transmission of a single bit over the continuous - time poisson channel with noiseless feedback .
we show that to send the bit reliably requires , on the average , half the energy of a photon . in the absence of peak - power constraints this holds irrespective of the intensity of the dark current .
we also solve for the energy required to send @xmath0 bits . | the continuous - time poisson channel models optical communication using direct detection .
the input to the channel @xmath1 is nonnegative @xmath2 and conditional on the input , the output @xmath3 is a conditional poisson process ( also known as a doubly - stochastic poisson process ) of intensity @xmath4 , where @xmath5 is a nonnegative constant called _
dark current_. thus , conditional on the input , the output @xmath3 is a nonhomogeneous poisson process and thus of independent increments with @xmath6 } = e^{-\lambda } \frac{\lambda^{\nu}}{\nu ! } , \quad \nu \in { \mathbb z},\ ] ] where @xmath7 to send a bit @xmath8 taking on the values @xmath9 and @xmath10 equiprobably over this channel _ without feedback _ we use two input waveforms @xmath11 and @xmath12 , and we send @xmath11 if @xmath13 and @xmath12 if @xmath14 .
we refer to @xmath15}\ ] ] as the transmitted energy in the time interval @xmath16 $ ] , although this is somewhat imprecise : this quantity is the expected number of transmitted photons in the interval , and one should technically multiply it by the energy in each photon ( which depends on the light frequency ) to obtain the transmitted energy in the interval .
we sometimes impose a _ peak - power constraint _ on the input , in which case we require that , with probability one , @xmath17 we then refer to @xmath18 as the maximal allowed power ( although , technically speaking , this needs to be normalized by the energy of each photon to have the sense of power . ) in the presence of feedback , the channel description is a bit more technical @xcite .
we require that conditional on @xmath13 , the channel output @xmath19 admit the @xmath20 intensity @xmath21 ( * ? ? ?
* chapter ii , section 3 , definition d7 ) .
that is , conditional on @xmath13 , @xmath19 is a point process adapted to some history @xmath22 ; @xmath23 is a nonnegative @xmath22-progressive process such that for all @xmath24 @xmath25 and for all nonnegative @xmath22-predictable processes
@xmath26 @xmath27 } = { \textnormal{\textsf{e}}_{}\!\left [ \int_{0}^{\infty } c(t ) \bigl(x_{0}(t ) + \lambda_{0}\bigr ) { \,\textnormal{d}}{t}\right]}.\ ] ] the conditional expected energy transmitted when @xmath13 over the time interval @xmath28 $ ] is @xmath29}.\ ] ] similarly , when @xmath14 the transmitted energy is @xmath30}.\ ] ] the average transmitted energy is thus @xmath31 a decoder is a mapping from the @xmath32-algebra generated by @xmath33 to the set @xmath34 .
we say that a bit can be transmitted reliably over our channel with average transmitted energy @xmath35 , if for any @xmath36 we can find some transmission interval @xmath37 and a coding / decoding rule of expected transmission energy @xmath35 and probability of error smaller than @xmath38 .
we denote by @xmath39 the least energy required to transmit a bit reliably over our channel .
the minimum energy required to send a single bit over the poisson channel with dark current @xmath5 , feedback , and no peak - power constraint is @xmath40 irrespective of the dark current .
if the dark current is zero , then this is achievable even under a peak - power constraint whenever @xmath41 .
the achievability when @xmath42 is straightforward . to send @xmath13
we transmit the all - zero input ; to send @xmath14 we transmit @xmath18 until , through the feedback link , we learn that a count was registered ; thereafter we send zero .
the decoder guesses `` @xmath13 '' if no counts were registered in the interval @xmath28 $ ] , and guesses `` @xmath14 '' otherwise .
since @xmath42 , the probability of error given @xmath13 is zero . also , the transmitted energy when @xmath13 is zero , so @xmath43 .
conditional on @xmath14 the time of the first count is exponential with mean @xmath44 .
consequently , @xmath45 .
conditional on @xmath14 , the probability of error is the probability that no counts are registered in the interval @xmath28 $ ] .
the probability of this event is the probability that the first count occurs after time @xmath37 , i.e. , the probability that a mean-@xmath44 exponential exceeds @xmath37 .
it thus tends to zero as @xmath46 . if @xmath47 and there is no peak - power constraint , we choose @xmath48 and @xmath49 and use the above scheme with @xmath50 .
we make sure that @xmath51 is small enough for the probability of a spurious count in the interval @xmath52 $ ] to be very small ( the probability of a spurious count in this interval is @xmath53 ) , and we choose @xmath18 large enough so that the probability that a mean-@xmath44 exponential exceeds @xmath51 is also very small .
to prove that @xmath39 can not be smaller than @xmath54 , it suffices to consider the case where @xmath42 .
we thus assume @xmath42 . in this case
there is no loss in optimality in assuming that to send @xmath13 we transmit the all - zero input .
indeed , given any general scheme consider the guess the decoder produces when faced with no counts .
call that false .
let true be its complement .
consider now a scheme with the same encoding rule for true , with the same decoding rule , but where we send the all - zero input to convey false .
the new scheme uses less ( or same ) energy ; has the same @xmath55 ; and has @xmath56 .
since the name we give to the hypotheses is immaterial , we can assume that false corresponds to @xmath13 .
next we argue that there is no loss in optimality in restricting ourselves to a detector that bases its decision on the presence of counts in the interval @xmath28 $ ] . since this enlarges the set of outcomes yielding the guess `` d=1 '' , this can not increase @xmath57 . to send @xmath13 we send the all - zero waveform , which results in no counts ( there is no dark current ) , so this does not change @xmath58 .
finally , we argue that there is no loss in optimality in stopping transmission once a count has been registered . indeed , this reduces the transmitted energy and does not change the performance of the above detector .
we next analyze the probability of error of such schemes .
conditional on @xmath13 , the probability of error is zero , because there is no dark current so sending zero input guarantees zero counts . as to the conditional probability of error given @xmath14 ,
let @xmath59 denote the random time at which the first count is registered .
substituting the stochastic process @xmath60 in yields @xmath61 } \\ & = { \textnormal{\textsf{e}}_{}\!\bigl[y(t_{1 } \wedge { { \textnormal{\usefont{u}{eur}{m}{n}\selectfont t } } } ) \kern-0.1em \bigm| \kern-0.1em d=1\bigr ] } \\ & = { \textnormal{\textsf{e}}_{}\!\biggl [ \int_{0}^{\infty } c(t ) { \,\textnormal{d}}y(t ) \kern-0.1em \biggm| \kern-0.1em d=1\biggr ] } \\ & = { \textnormal{\textsf{e}}_{}\!\left [ \int_{0}^{\infty } c(t ) x_{1}(t ) { \,\textnormal{d}}{t}\right ] } \\ & = { \textnormal{\textsf{e}}_{}\!\left [ \int_{0}^{t_{1 } \wedge { { \textnormal{\usefont{u}{eur}{m}{n}\selectfont t } } } } x_{1}(t ) { \,\textnormal{d}}{t}\right ] } \\ & = { \mathcal e}_{1}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] for the probability of error to tend to zero , the expected energy transmitted to convey @xmath14 must thus approach @xmath10 .
more generally , to send @xmath0 bits requires @xmath62 of the energy of a photon . when @xmath63 we recover the required energy to send one bit . to prove the converse that one can not accomplish the task with less energy requires a simple genie - aided argument .
once again we can assume no dark current , and we can show that there is no loss in optimality in conveying the zero message using the all - zero input and by limiting ourselves to detectors that guess that the transmitted message was the zero message if , and only if , no counts were registered .
we then consider a genie that , if a count is registered , tells the detector which message was sent . with the aid of the genie the detectors errs if , and only if , the transmitted message was not the zero message and no counts were registered .
thus , by our previous analysis , the required energy of each of the nonzero messages must be one .
averaging over the equally - likely messages demonstrates that @xmath64 of the energy of a photon is necessary for reliable transmission .
the direct part in the absence of dark current is based on a simple scheme where the transmission interval @xmath65 is divided into @xmath66 intervals .
we associate with the nonzero message @xmath67 the interval @xmath68 to send the nonzero message @xmath69 we transmit with a very high power starting at time @xmath70 until a count is registered or until the end of the interval at time @xmath71 . to send the zero message we send the all - zero signal .
the detector operates as follows . if no counts are registered , it guesses that the zeroth message was sent .
if a count is registered , it declares that the transmitted message was the one that corresponds to the interval in which the count was registered . in the presence of dark
current we use the same scheme except that we choose as our transmission time a very short interval @xmath52 $ ] in which the probability of a spurious count is negligible .
in the absence of a peak power constraint , the capacity of the poisson channel ( with or without feedback ) is infinite @xcite , @xcite .
thus , in sending a very large number of bits , reliable communication can be had with an arbitrarily small expected energy per bit .
the situation changes dramatically when sending a _ single _ bit . even in the presence of feedback ,
the required energy is finite ; it is , in fact , @xmath54 .
this should be contrasted with the infinite - bandwidth gaussian channel , where a single bit can be sent reliably with the same amount of energy that would be required per bit if one were sending a large number of bits @xcite , @xcite . | continuous - time poisson channel models optical communication direct detection input channel @xmath1 nonnegative @xmath2 conditional input output @xmath3 conditional poisson process doubly - stochastic poisson process intensity @xmath4 @xmath5 nonnegative constant _ dark current_ conditional input output @xmath3 nonhomogeneous poisson process independent increments @xmath6 = e^{-\lambda\lambda @xmath7 send @xmath8 values @xmath9 @xmath10 over channel without feedback use two input waveforms @xmath11 @xmath12 send @xmath11 if @xmath13 @xmath12 if @xmath14 refer @xmath15 transmitted energy time interval @xmath16 quantity expected number transmitted photons interval multiply by energy each photon depends light frequency obtain transmitted energy interval impose peak - power constraint input require probability one @xmath17 refer @xmath18 maximal allowed power normalized by energy each photon power presence feedback channel description more technical conditional on @xmath13 channel output @xmath19 admit @xmath20 intensity @xmath21 chapter ii , section 3 definition d7 )conditional @xmath13 @xmath19 point process adapted history @xmath22 @xmath23 nonnegative @xmath22-progressive process @xmath24 @xmath25 nonnegative @xmath22-predictable processes @xmath26 @xmath27\textnormal\lambda} conditional expected energy transmitted @xmath13 time interval @xmath28 @xmath29}. @xmath14 transmitted energy @xmath30} average transmitted energy @xmath31 decoder mapping @xmath32-algebra @xmath33 @xmath34 bit transmitted reliably channel average transmitted energy @xmath35 @xmath36 transmission interval @xmath37 coding decoding rule expected transmission energy @xmath35 probability error smaller @xmath38 @xmath39 least energy required transmit bit reliably channel minimum energy send single bit channel dark current @xmath5 feedback no peak - power constraint @xmath40 irrespective dark current dark current zero achievable peak - power constraint @xmath41 achievability @xmath42 straightforwardsend @xmath13 transmit all - zero input send @xmath14 transmit @xmath18 until count registered send zero decoder guesses @xmath13 if no counts registered interval @xmath28 $ guesses @xmath14 otherwise since @xmath42 probability error @xmath13 zero transmitted energy when @xmath13 zero @xmath43 conditional @xmath14 time first count exponential with mean @xmath44 @xmath45 conditional @xmath14 probability error no counts registered interval @xmath28 $ ] probability first count after time @xmath37 mean-@xmath44 exponential exceeds @xmath37 tends zero as @xmath46 @xmath47 no peak - power constraint choose @xmath48 @xmath49 use scheme with @xmath50 @xmath51 small probability spurious count interval @xmath52 $ small @xmath53 choose @xmath18 large probability mean-@xmath44 exponential exceeds @xmath51 small @xmath39 not smaller than @xmath54 consider case @xmath42 assume @xmath42 no loss optimality send @xmath13 transmit all - zero input consider guess decoder produces no counts call false true be complementconsider scheme same encoding rule for true decoding rule send all - zero input convey false new scheme uses less or energy same @xmath55 @xmath56 name hypotheses immaterial assume false corresponds to @xmath13 argue no loss in optimality restricting detector decision on presence counts in interval @xmath28 $ enlarges outcomes guess d=1 increase @xmath57 send @xmath13 all - zero waveform results no counts no dark current change @xmath58 no loss in optimality stopping transmission once count registered reduces transmitted energy change performance detector analyze probability of error of schemes conditional on @xmath13 probability error zero no dark current zero input guarantees zero counts conditional probability of error @xmath14 @xmath59 denote random time first count registeredstochastic process @xmath60 yields @xmath61 \textnormal{\textsf{e}}\bigl[y_{1 \textnormal{\usefont{u\selectfont t \kern-0.1em \bigm d=1\bigr \textnormal{\textsf{e}}{\biggl{0{\infty }(t\textnormal{d}}y(t-0.1em \textnormal{\textsf{e}}_{}\left\int_{0}^{\infty } c(t ) x_{1}(t )\textnormal{d}}{t}\right \textnormal{\textsf{e}}{}\left\int_{0}^{t_{1 }\wedge \textnormal{\usefont{u}\selectfont t x_{1}(t )\textnormal{d}}{t}\right ] \mathcal e}_{1}.\end{aligned} probability error zero expected energy convey @xmath14 approach @xmath10 send @xmath0 bits requires @xmath62 energy photon @xmath63 recover energy send one bit converse task less energy requires genie - argumentassume no dark current show no loss in optimality conveying zero message using all - zero input limiting to detectors guess message zero if no counts registered consider genie if count registered tells detector which message sent detectors errs if message not zero no counts registered required energy of nonzero messages must be one averaging over equally - likely messages @xmath64 energy photon necessary for reliable transmission part absence dark current scheme transmission interval @xmath65 divided into @xmath66 intervals associate with nonzero message @xmath67 interval @xmath68 send nonzero message @xmath69 transmit with high power starting time @xmath70 until count registered or end of interval @xmath71 send zero message send all - zero signal detector operates if no counts registered guesses zeroth message sent if count registered declares transmitted message corresponds to interval count registered dark current use same scheme choose transmission time short interval @xmath52 probability of spurious count negligible peak power constraint capacity of poisson channel feedback infinite sending large number of bits reliable communication with small expected energy per bit situation changes when sending single bit presence of feedback required energy finite @xmath54 contrasted with infinite - bandwidth gaussian channel single bit sent with same energy required per bit large number bits @xcite , @xcite . | 0.430988 | 2,496 | 1,328 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,643 | in this paper , we present a method to construct full separability criteria for tripartite systems of qubits .
the spirit of our approach is that a tripartite pure state can be regarded as a three - order tensor that provides an intuitionistic mathematical formulation for the full separability of pure states .
we extend the definition to mixed states and given out the corresponding full separability criterion . as applications ,
we discuss the separability of several bound entangled states , which shows that our criterion is feasible . | entanglement is an essential ingredient in quantum information and the central feature of quantum mechanics which distinguishes a quantum system from its classical counterpart . in recent years
, it has been regarded as an important physical resource , and widely applied to a lot of quantum information processing(qip ) : quantum computation [ 1 ] , quantum cryptography [ 2 ] , quantum teleportation [ 3 ] , quantum dense coding [ 4 ] and so on .
entanglement arises only if some subsystems ever interacted with the others among the whole multipartite system in physics , or only if the multipartite quantum state is not separable or factorable in mathematics .
the latter provides a direct way to tell whether or not a given quantum state is entangled . as to the separability of bipartite quantum states , partial entropy introduced by bennett _
_ al_. [ 5 ] provides a good criterion of separability for pure states .
later , wootters presents the remarkable concurrence for bipartite systems of qubits [ 6,7 ] . based on the motivation of generalizing the definition of concurrence to higher dimensional systems , many attempts have been made [ 8,9,10,11 ] , which provide good separability criteria for bipartite qubit systems under corresponding conditions , whilst ref.[8 ] also presents an alternative method to minimize the convex hull for mixed states . as to multipartite quantum systems ,
several separability criteria have been proposed [ 12,13,14,15,16,17 ] .
the most notable one is 3-tangle for three qubits
recently , the result has been generalized to the higher dimensional systems [ 18 ] . despite the enormous effort ,
the separability of quantum states especially in higher dimensional systems is still an open problem . in this paper
we construct the full separability criteria for arbitrary tripartite qubit system by a novel method , i.e. a tripartite pure state can be defined by a three - order tensor .
the definition provides an intuitionistic mathematical formulation for the full separability of pure states .
analogous to ref.[8 ] , we extend the definition to mixed states .
more importantly , our approach is easily generalized to higher dimensional systems . as applications ,
we discuss separability of two bound entangled states introduced in [ 19,20 ] , respectively .
we start with the separability definition of tripartite qubit pure state @xmath0 @xmath1 is fully separable iff @xmath2consider a general tripartite pure state written by@xmath3where @xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 , the coefficients @xmath8s can be arranged as a three - order tensor ( tensor cube ) [ 21 ] as shown in figure 1 .
note that the subscripts of @xmath8 correspond to the basis @xmath9 .
every surface can be regarded as the tensor product of a single qubit and an unnormalized bipartite state .
hence , if the two vectors ( edges ) of a surface are linear relevant ( including one of the vectors is @xmath10 vector ) , then the bipartite state mentioned above can be factorized .
the conclusion for diagonal plane is analogous .
considering all the planes , one can easily find that the tripartite state is fully separable iff all the vectors which are parallel mutually shown in the cube , are linear relevant , according to the fundamental linear algebra .
i.e. the rank of every matrix composed of four coefficients on the corresponding surface and diagonal plane is @xmath11 .
equivalently , we can obtain the following lemma .
* * lemma1.-**a tripartite pure state @xmath12 with the form of eq.(2 ) in @xmath13 dimensional hilbert space is fully separable , iff the following six equations hold : @xmath14@xmath15@xmath16@xmath17@xmath18@xmath19where @xmath20 and @xmath21 . * proof . *
( sufficient condition ) if eq.(3)-eq.(5 ) hold , then the rank of every matrix that the cubic surface corresponds to is _
one_. if eq.(6)-eq.(8 ) hold , then the rank of every matrix that the cubic diagonal plane corresponds to is _
one_. hence , that eq.(3)-eq.(8 ) hold simultaneously shows that the tripartite pure state can be fully factorized , i.e. it is fully separable .
( necessary condition ) if a given tripartite state is fully separable , one can easily obtain that the rank of every corresponding matrix is @xmath11 .
namely , eq.(3)-eq.(8 ) hold .
consider that @xmath22 can be denoted by a vector in @xmath13 dimensional hilbert space,@xmath23with the superscript @xmath24 denoting transpose , we can write the above equations ( 3 - 8 ) in matrix notation by@xmath25where the star denotes complex conjugation , and @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 , with @xmath35 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 and @xmath38 .
( alternatively , @xmath39 can be replaced by @xmath40 for tripartite pure states of qubit with @xmath41 , @xmath42 and @xmath43 , where @xmath44 , by which @xmath45 comlex optimal parameters can be reduced for the case of mixed states ) .
define a new vector @xmath46 by @xmath47 with @xmath48 @xmath49 , then the length of the vector can be given by @xmath50 .
therefore , the full separability criterion for a tripartite state can be expressed by a more rigorous form as follows . * * theorem1.-**a tripartite pure state @xmath51 is fully separable iff @xmath52
. * proof . * that * * * * @xmath53 is equivalent to that @xmath54 holds for any @xmath55 . according to lemma 1 , one can obtain that @xmath53 is the sufficient and necessary condition .
a tripartite mixed state @xmath56 is fully separable iff there exists a decomposition @xmath57 , @xmath58 such that @xmath59 is fully separable for every @xmath60 or equivalently iff the infimum of the average @xmath61 vanishes , namely,@xmath62among all possible decompositions .
therefore , for any a given decomposition @xmath63according to the minkowski inequality@xmath64one can get@xmath65consider the matrix notation [ 8 ] of equation ( 10 ) as @xmath66 , where @xmath67 is a diagonal matrix with @xmath68 , the columns of the matrix @xmath69 correspond to the vectors @xmath59 , and the eigenvalue decomposition , @xmath70 , where @xmath71 is a diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements are the eigenvalues of @xmath56 , and @xmath72 is a unitary matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors of @xmath56 , associated with the relation @xmath73 , where @xmath74 is a right - unitary matrix , inequality ( 12 ) can be rewritten as @xmath75 in terms of the cauchy - schwarz inequality @xmath76the inequality @xmath77is implied for any @xmath78 with @xmath79 and @xmath80 where @xmath81 .
the infimum of equation ( 15 ) is given by @xmath82 analogous to ref.[8 ] , with @xmath83s are the singular values , in decreasing order , of the matrix @xmath84 .
@xmath85 is as well expressed by @xmath86one can easily see that @xmath87 provides a necessary and even sufficient condition of full separability for tripartite mixed qubit systems , hence an effective separability criterion
. however , it is so unfortunate that @xmath85 can not serve as a good entanglement measure , but only an effective criterion to detect whether a state is fully separable , because @xmath46 for pure states is not invariant under local unitary transformations .
at first , consider the complementary states to shifts upb [ 19 ] .
shifts upb is the set of the following four product states@xmath88with @xmath89 .
the corresponding bound entangled ( complementary ) state is given by @xmath90with @xmath91 corresponding to the shifts upb . in ref.[19 ] , it is stated that this complementary state has the curious property that not only is it two - way ppt , it is also two - way separable . the numerical result based on our criterion
can show a _
non - zero _ ( @xmath92 ) entanglement for @xmath93 , which is consistent to [ 19 ] .
let s consider the second example , the dr - cirac -tarrach states [ 20 ] @xmath94we can also show the @xmath95 @xmath96 ( @xmath97 ) for @xmath98the conclusion is also implied in [ 20 ] .
the above numerical tests are operated as follows . in order to show the nonzero @xmath99 with @xmath100 or @xmath101 , we choose @xmath102 random vectors @xmath103 generated by _
matlab 6.5 _ for a given @xmath104 , then substitute these vectors into @xmath105 and obtain @xmath106 matrices .
we can get @xmath102 ( @xmath107)s by singular value decomposition for the matrices .
the maximal @xmath108 among the matrices is assigned to @xmath99 . due to the whole process
, it is obvious that our numerical approach is more effective to test the _
it can only provide a reference for the _ zero _ @xmath99 .
if a standard numerical process is needed , we suggest that the approach introduced in ref.[17 ] be preferred .
as a summary , we have shown effective criteria for tripartite qubit systems by the pioneering application of the approach to define a tripartite pure state as a three - order tensor . however , although our criteria can be reduced to wootters concurrence [ 7 ] for bipartite systems , as mentioned above , the criteria can not serve as a good entanglement measure . therefore , it is not necessary to find out the concrete value of @xmath85 , but whether @xmath110 are greater than @xmath10 , as can be found in our examples .
based on the tensor treatment for a tripartite pure state , if a more suitable @xmath111 that can serve as a good entanglement measure can be found , it will be interesting .
it deserves our attention that our approach can be easily extended to test the full separability of multipartite systems in arbitrary dimension , which will be given out in the forthcoming works .
we would like to thank x. x. yi for extensive and valuable advice .
we are grateful to the referees for their useful suggestion and comments .
this work was supported by ministry of science and technology , china , under grant no.2100cca00700 .
different from the previous definition of tensors , all the quantities with indices , such as @xmath112 , are called three - order tensors here . therefore , the set of all one - order tensor is the set of vectors , and the set of all two - order tensors is the set of matrices .
three - order tensors @xmath112 are matrices correpsonding to the planes in the cube ( vectors corresponding to the edges ) when any one ( two ) of their three indices is ( are ) fixed . | entanglement essential in quantum information central feature quantum mechanics distinguishes quantum system from classical counterpart important physical resource applied to quantum information processing computation cryptography teleportation dense coding entanglement arises if subsystems interacted multipartite or if quantum state not separable or factorable in mathematics latter provides direct way to tell quantum state entangled bipartite quantum states partial entropy by bennett good criterion separability for pure states wootters presents concurrence for bipartite systems of qubits generalizing definition concurrence to higher dimensional systems attempts made provide good separability criteria for bipartite qubit systems alternative method to minimize convex hull for mixed states multipartite quantum systems several separability criteria proposed notable 3-tangle for three qubits generalized to higher dimensional systems separability of quantum states in higher dimensional systems open problem paper full separability criteria for arbitrary tripartite qubit system by novel method tripartite pure state defined by three - order tensor definition provides intuitionistic mathematical formulation for full separability of pure states analogous refextend definition to mixed states approach generalized to higher dimensional systems discuss separability of two bound entangled states in [ 19,20 ] start with separability definition of tripartite qubit pure state @xmath0 @xmath1 separable @xmath2consider general tripartite pure state@xmath3where coefficients @xmath8s arranged as three - order tensor cube ) figure 1 subscripts of @xmath8 correspond to basis @xmath9 surface tensor product of single qubit unnormalized bipartite state if two vectors surface linear relevant @xmath10 vector bipartite state factorized conclusion for diagonal plane analogous tripartite state fully separable vectors parallel cube linear relevant fundamental linear algebra rank of matrix four coefficients on surface diagonal plane is @xmath11 obtain tripartite pure state @xmath12 with form of eq.(2 ) in @xmath13 dimensional hilbert space fully separable six equations hold : @xmath14 @xmath20 @xmath21 condition if eq.(3)-eq.(5 ) hold rank matrix cubic surface _ one_ eq.(6)-eq.(8 ) hold rank matrix cubic diagonal plane _ one_ eq.(3)-eq.(8 ) hold shows tripartite pure state fully factorized fully separable tripartite state separable rank matrix @xmath11 eq.(3)-eq.(8 ) hold @xmath22 denoted vector @xmath13 dimensional hilbert space@xmath23with superscript @xmath24 denoting transpose write equations ( 3 - 8 ) matrix notation by@xmath25where star denotes complex conjugation @xmath26 @xmath35 @xmath39 replaced by @xmath40 tripartite pure states @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 optimal parameters reduced mixed states define new vector @xmath46 by @xmath47 with @xmath48 @xmath49 length vector given by @xmath50 full separability criterion tripartite state expressed form theorem1. tripartite pure state @xmath51 fully separable iff @xmath52 @xmath53 equivalent @xmath54 @xmath55 lemma 1 @xmath53 sufficient necessary condition tripartite mixed state @xmath56 separable decomposition @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 separable @xmath60 infimum average @xmath61 vanishes@xmath62among decompositions decomposition minkowski inequality@xmath65consider matrix notation equation @xmath66 @xmath67 diagonal matrix with @xmath68 columns @xmath69 correspond to vectors @xmath59 @xmath71 diagonal matrix elements eigenvalues @xmath56 @xmath72 unitary matrix columns eigenvectors @xmath56 @xmath73 @xmath74 right - unitary matrix inequality ( 12 ) rewritten as @xmath75 cauchy - schwarz inequality inequality @xmath77is implied @xmath78 with @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 infimum of equation ( 15 ) by @xmath82 @xmath83s singular values of matrix @xmath84 @xmath85 expressed by @xmath87 provides necessary sufficient condition full separability for tripartite mixed qubit systems effective separability criterionunfortunate @xmath85 good entanglement measure effective criterion state separable @xmath46 not invariant under local unitary transformations consider complementary states to shifts upb 19 four product states@xmath88with @xmath89 corresponding bound entangled complementary state by @xmath90with @xmath91 upb complementary state two - way ppt two - way separable numerical result non - zero @xmath92 ) entanglement for @xmath93 consistent to [ 19 ] consider second example dr - cirac -tarrach states 20 @xmath94we show @xmath95 @xmath96 ( @xmath97 ) for @xmath98the conclusion implied 20 numerical tests operated show nonzero @xmath99 with @xmath100 @xmath101 choose @xmath102 random vectors @xmath103 matlab 6.5 @xmath104 substitute vectors into @xmath105 obtain @xmath106 matrices get @xmath102 ( @xmath107)s by singular value decomposition maximal @xmath108 assigned to @xmath99 numerical approach effective reference for _ zero _ @xmath99 standard numerical process approach ref.[17 ]shown effective criteria for tripartite qubit systems by approach to define tripartite pure state as three - order tensor criteria reduced to wootters concurrence 7 ] for bipartite systems not serve good entanglement measure not necessary to find concrete value of @xmath85 but whether @xmath110 greater than @xmath10 in examples if suitable @xmath111 good entanglement measure found interesting approach can extended to test full separability of multipartite systems in arbitrary dimension in forthcoming works thank x. x. yi for advice grateful to referees for suggestion comments work supported by ministry of science and technology china under grant no.2100cca00700 all quantities with indices @xmath112 called three - order tensors set of one - order tensor vectors two - order tensors matrices three - order tensors @xmath112 are matrices to planes in cube vectors to edges when three indices fixed | 0.356632 | 2,537 | 1,326 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,648 | computer - based tests with randomly generated questions allow a large number of different tests to be generated . given a fixed number of alternatives for each question ,
the number of tests that need to be generated before all possible questions have appeared is surprisingly low . | [ [ ams - subject - classification - msc2010 ] ] ams subject classification ( msc2010 ) the use of computer - based tests in which questions are randomly generated in some way provides a means whereby a large number of different tests can be generated ; many universities currently use such tests as part of the student assessment process . in this paper
we present findings that illustrate that , although the number of different possible tests is high and grows very rapidly as the number of alternatives for each question increases , the average number of tests that need to be generated before all possible questions have appeared at least once is surprisingly low .
we presented preliminary findings along these lines in @xcite .
a computer - based test consists of @xmath0 questions , each ( independently ) selected at random from a separate bank of @xmath1 alternatives .
let @xmath2 be the number of tests one needs to generate in order to see all the @xmath3 questions in the @xmath0 question banks at least once .
we are interested in how , for fixed @xmath1 , the random variable @xmath2 grows with the number of questions @xmath0 in the test .
typically , @xmath1 might be 10i.e
. each question might have a bank of 10 alternatives but we shall allow any value of @xmath1 , and give numerical results for @xmath4 and @xmath5 as well as for @xmath6 . in the case
@xmath7 , i.e. a one - question test , we re - notate @xmath2 as @xmath8 , and observe that we have an equivalent to the classic coupon - collector problem : your favourite cereal has a coupon in each packet , and there are @xmath1 alternative types of coupon .
@xmath8 is the number of packets you have to buy in order to get at least one coupon of each of the @xmath1 types .
the coupon - collector problem has been much studied ; see e.g. @xcite .
we can write @xmath8 as @xmath9 where each @xmath10 is the number of cereal packets you must buy in order to acquire a new type of coupon , when you already have @xmath11 types in your collection .
thus @xmath12 , @xmath13 is the number of further packets you find you need to gain a second type , and so on .
the random variables @xmath14 , , @xmath15 are mutually independent . for the distribution of @xmath16 , clearly @xmath17 we say that @xmath18 , or @xmath19 has a geometric distribution with parameter @xmath20 , if @xmath21 for @xmath22 , 2 , .
thus @xmath23 . as the @xmath24 distribution has expectation @xmath25 it follows that @xmath26 for different values of @xmath1 we therefore have the following .
the amount of variability can be better appreciated through the standard deviation .
the asymptotic bounds on the standard deviation of @xmath2 are @xmath27 and some values for these are in table [ ta : sd ] .
the lower bound is non - trivial , i.e. positive , in each case .
we are grateful to dave pidcock , a colleague in the mathematics education centre at loughborough university , for raising the query in the first place . as a member of staff using computer - based tests to assess students , he was concerned about this issue from a practical viewpoint . that led rc to post a query on allstat .
cmg was not the only person to respond to the query , and we also acknowledge the others who responded , particularly simon bond .
cornish , r. , goldie , c. m. , and robinson , c. l. 2006 .
computer - assisted assessment : how many questions are enough ? _ computer - aided assessment in mathematics _
, 9pp . ; http://mathstore.ac.uk/articles/maths-caa-series/feb2006 . | ams - subject - classification - msc2010 ams subject classification msc2010 ) computer - based tests questions randomly generated provides large number tests universities use tests student assessment process paper findings number possible tests high grows rapidly alternatives increases average number tests before all questions appeared once low presented preliminary findings in @xcite computer - based test @xmath0 questions selected at random from bank @xmath1 alternatives @xmath2 be number of tests to see all @xmath3 questions banks once interested in random variable @xmath2 grows with number of questions @xmath0 @xmath1 might be alternatives allow any value of @xmath1 give numerical results for @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 one - question test re - notate @xmath2 as @xmath8 equivalent to coupon - collector problem favourite cereal has coupon each packet @xmath1 alternative types coupon @xmath8 is number of packets to get one coupon of each @xmath1 coupon - collector problem studied see @xcite write @xmath8 as @xmath9 each @xmath10 number of cereal packets acquire new coupon @xmath11 types collection @xmath12, @xmath13 number of further packets gain second type random variables @xmath14 @xmath15 independent distribution of @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 or @xmath19 geometric distribution with parameter @xmath20 @xmath21 for @xmath22 thus @xmath23 @xmath24 distribution has expectation @xmath25 follows @xmath26 for different values of @xmath1 variability appreciated through standard deviation asymptotic bounds on standard deviation of @xmath2 are @xmath27 values in table [ ta : sd ] lower bound non - trivial positive case grateful to dave pidcock colleague mathematics education centre loughborough university for raising query concerned about issue led post query on allstat not only acknowledge others responded simon bond cornish goldie robinson 2006 computer - assisted assessment how many questions enough ? mathematics 9pp http://mathstore.ac.uk/articles/maths-caa-series/feb2006 | 0.136937 | 860 | 447 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,659 | k@xmath0coo@xmath1 shares many similarities with na@xmath0coo@xmath1 , as well as some important differences ( no hydration - induced superconductivity has been reported ) . at @xmath2 k , k@xmath3coo@xmath1 becomes an insulator with a tiny optical gap as happens in na@xmath3coo@xmath1 at 52 k. this similarity , with a known common structure , enables direct comparisons to be made . using
the k - zigzag structure recently reported and the local density approximation , we compare and contrast these cobaltates at @xmath4=0.5 .
although the electronic structures are quite similar as expected , substantial differences are observed near the fermi level .
these differences are found to be attributable mostly to the chemical , rather than structural difference : although na is normally considered to be fully ion , k has somewhat more highly ionic character than does na in these cobaltates . | takada _ et al .
_ found superconductivity in the layered quasi - two dimensional na@xmath0coo@xmath1 when intercalating enough water ( @xmath5h@xmath1o ) to form a separate water layer between coo@xmath1 and na layers.@xcite the nonsuperconducting dehydrated na@xmath0coo@xmath1 system shows a rich phase diagram , which significantly depends on @xmath4.@xcite for @xmath6 , the system shows weakly correlated band - like behavior including pauli paramagnetism , while the phase @xmath7 reveals correlated behavior such as large enhancement in linear specific coefficient , curie - weiss susceptibility,@xcite and magnetic ordering for @xmath8 .
the most peculiar aspect of this system is an insulating phase at @xmath9@xcite with a tiny gap @xmath10 mev.@xcite as the temperature is decreased , antiferromagnetic ordering of some co spins appears at @xmath11 k , and at @xmath12 k there is a gap opening , which reflects the charge - ordering of nonmagnetic @xmath13 co1 ions and magnetic @xmath14 co2 ions.@xcite using neutron diffraction studies , williams _
_ inferred the charge difference of 0.12@xmath15 between co1 and co2.@xcite this value is much smaller than the 1@xmath15 value expected from a naive formal charge concept , but is roughly consistent with the theoretically calculated value 0.2@xmath15 using a correlated band theory lda+u method.@xcite as a result , even though there is small charge difference between the co ions , the charge - disproportionation is accompanied by local moment formation and the spins are consistent with the formal valences co@xmath16 and co@xmath17.@xcite the discovery of an unexpected insulating state in na@xmath3coo@xmath1 ( n@xmath3co ) and hydration - induced superconductivity has stimulated the study of isostructural and isovalent family a@xmath0coo@xmath1 ( a = k , rb , cs ) . in spite of a few attempts to produce superconductivity in hydrated k@xmath0coo@xmath1 ,
the amount of intercalated water is 0.8 or less , forming only a monohydrate ( k+h@xmath1o ) layer and no superconductivity has been detected yet.@xcite the k@xmath0coo@xmath1 system has been known for three decades , since hagenmuller and colleagues reported@xcite structure , transport , and magnetic data on phases with @xmath4=1.0 , 0.67 , and 0.50 .
recently , an insulating phase in k@xmath3coo@xmath1 ( k@xmath3co ) has been studied in more detail by a few groups;@xcite nakamura _
et al._@xcite in the mid-1990s had reported an almost temperature - independent resistivity well above a metallic value . in k@xmath3co , using nmr and neutron diffraction studies , watanabe _ et al .
_ observed similar temperature evolution as in n@xmath3co.@xcite at @xmath18 k , a kink in the in - plane susceptibility @xmath19 indicates onset of antiferromagnetic ordering .
the resistivity increases sharply at @xmath2 k , signaling the charge - ordering . at this temperature
, there is an additional magnetic rearrangement , indicated by kinks in both @xmath19 and @xmath20 . from @xmath21sr experiments sugiyama _ et al . _
have obtained similar transition temperatures , 60 and 16 k , in metallic k@xmath22co.@xcite the former is a magnetic ordering temperature from a paramagnetic state . based on a mean field treatment of a hubbard model
, they suggested there may be a linear spin density wave ( sdw ) state between 16 and 60 k , while a commensurate helical sdw state exists below 16 k. additionally , k or na ions order ( structurally ) , resulting in formation of a 2@xmath23@xmath24 supercell at t@xmath25 and 470 k for k and na ions , respectively.@xcite the tiny energy gap of similar magnitude with n@xmath3co has been observed by qian _
et al . _ with arpes measurements.@xcite
several characteristics of n@xmath0co , in particular the superconductivity upon hydration and effects of cation ordering , suggest that the behavior in this system is sensitive to details of the electronic structure .
the fact that k@xmath3co is similar to n@xmath3co , yet shows clear differences in behavior , indicates that a comparison of the electronic structures of these systems is warranted . in this paper , we compare and contrast the two insulating systems k@xmath3co and n@xmath3co . here
correlation effects and detailed magnetic ordering are neglected , but the observed @xmath26 supercell including na / k zigzag ordering is adopted .
( @xmath27 is the hexagonal lattice constant . )
.crystal structure comparison between k@xmath0coo@xmath1 and na@xmath0coo@xmath1 at @xmath4=0.5 .
the orthorhombic structures ( space group : @xmath28 , no .
59 ) determined from na- or k - zigzag ordering are a @xmath26 superstructure which is based on the hexagonal structure with a lattice constant @xmath27 . in this structure ,
the oxygens have three site symmetries , two @xmath29 and one @xmath30 . here , @xmath31 is an oxygen height from the co layers .
a main difference in these structures is that k@xmath3coo@xmath1 has 12 % larger @xmath32 lattice constant .
the data are from ref .
@xcite for na@xmath3coo@xmath1 and ref .
@xcite for k@xmath3coo@xmath1 . [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ table2 ] these differences between two cobaltates can be clarified in two ways .
first , we can determine the effects purely due to chemical difference ( k vs. na ) as opposed to the size difference leading to structural differences .
for this , n@xmath3co is assigned the same structure as in k@xmath3co and denoted n@xmath3co@xmath33 .
the resulting band structure enlarged near @xmath34 is compared with that of k@xmath3co in fig .
[ band3 ] . even in the identical structure ,
substantial differences on an important energy scale are evident .
the top valence band in n@xmath3co@xmath33 is 20 mev higher in energy at the @xmath35 point , although the @xmath36 bandwidth is about 5% smaller ( not shown ) .
another difference is that the projected k and na dos is almost identical ( and small , of course ) through most of the @xmath36 bands , except in a @xmath37 mev region at and below the fermi level , where the na projected dos ( pdos ) is 20 - 35% larger ( more than 50% larger at e@xmath38 ) .
these distinctions indicate that the differences in electronic structure are mainly due to k substitution itself rather than indirectly through the change in structure .
second , using the mullikan charge decomposition , we obtained atom - decomposed charges , which are displayed in table [ table2 ] .
the k ion is very noticeably more ionic than the na ion , consistent with the pdos difference mentioned just above .
the compensating charge is spread over the oxygen ions ; the co charges are essentially the same for k@xmath3co and n@xmath3co@xmath33 .
this higher ionicity of k seems to be the most discernible difference between these cobaltates .
it is still unclear what water does in the system .
the only unambiguously aspect is that hydration dramatically increases the @xmath32 lattice constant , resulting in more two - dimensionality of the electronic system.@xcite however , although the isostructural system na@xmath39tas@xmath1@xmath40h@xmath1o shows very similar change in the @xmath32 lattice constant when hydrated,@xcite @xmath41 k in this system is independent of @xmath42 .
this difference in behavior established that water has effects in the cobaltates that are not present in the transition metal disulfides and diselenides . in this respect
it is interesting that ( na@xmath43k@xmath44)coo@xmath1@xmath450.87h@xmath1o shows superconductivity with @xmath46 k and about 7 increment in @xmath32 lattice constant from k@xmath47co , which is similar in amount to that of hydrated sodium cobaltate.@xcite
using a crystal structure recently reported , we have investigated at the lda level the differences in electronic structure between k@xmath3coo@xmath1 and n@xmath3coo@xmath1 .
comparison shows a few substantial differences near @xmath34 ; smaller @xmath36 bandwidth by 60 mev in k@xmath3coo@xmath1 , and additional fermi surfaces along the @xmath48 line which are almost flat near the @xmath49 point .
these differences are due more to chemical differences ( higher ionic character of k ) rather than to structural difference between the systems . an angle - resolved photoemission comparison of the three systems a@xmath0coo@xmath1 , a = na , k , and rb , has appeared,@xcite with the differences at equal doping levels being small almost too small to quantify .
unfortunately , samples at precisely @xmath4=0.5 were not the focus of that study . since the superstructure we have studied
is confined to @xmath4=0.5 , our results can not be compared with this data .
however , the structural disorder of the alkali at @xmath500.5 , which extends to the coo@xmath1 substructure , broadens the bands and hides small distinctions.@xcite this observation suggests that carrying out spectroscopic studies of both systems in the insulating phase at @xmath4=0.5 should be an excellent way to identify and characterize more precisely the effects of the different alkali cations .
we acknowledge m. d. johannes and d. j. singh for illuminating conversations , and d. qian for clarifying the arpes data .
this work was supported by doe grant de - fg03 - 01er45876 and doe s computational materials science network . w.e.p .
acknowledges the stimulating influence of doe s stockpile stewardship academic alliance program .
n. l. wang , d. wu , g. li , x. h. chen , c. h. wang , and x. g. luo , phys .
lett . * 93 * , 147403 ( 2004 ) ; j. hwang , j. yang , t. timusk , and f. c. chou , phys .
b * 72 * , 024549 ( 2005 ) ; s. lupi , m. ortolani , l. baldassarre , p. calvani , d. prabhakaran , and a. t. boothroyd , _ ibid . _ * 72 * , 024550 ( 2005 ) .
s. nakamura , j. ohtake , n. yonezawa , and s. iida , j. phys .
jpn . * 65 * , 358 ( 1996 ) . compared with the existing data for lattice constants ,
this sample does not seem to be exact @xmath9 phase , but @xmath51 .
this assumption may be supported by the curie - weiss behavior in the sample . | takada found superconductivity in layered na@xmath0coo@xmath1 intercalating water separate water layer between coo na layers nonsuperconducting dehydrated na@xmath0coo@xmath1 system shows rich phase diagram depends on @xmath4 @xmath6 system shows weakly correlated band - like behavior paramagnetism @xmath7 correlated behavior enhancement linear coefficient curie - weiss susceptibility magnetic ordering for @xmath8 peculiar insulating phase at @xmath9 tiny gap @xmath10 temperature antiferromagnetic ordering spins at @xmath11 k k gap opening charge - ordering of nonmagnetic @xmath13 co1 magnetic co2 ions williams inferred charge difference of 0.12@xmath15 between co1 and co2. smaller than consistent with calculated value 0.2@xmath15 band theory method charge - disproportionation accompanied by local moment formation spins consistent with formal valences co@xmath16@xmath17discovery insulating state in@xmath3coo@xmath1 hydration - induced superconductivity stimulated study isostructural isovalent family@xmath0coo@xmath1 attempts superconductivity in hydrated intercalated water 0.8 or less monohydrate (+h layer no superconductivity detected k@xmath0coo@xmath1 system known three decades since hagenmuller structure magnetic data phases @xmath4=1.0 0.67 0.50 insulating phase in k@xmath3coo@xmath1 studied groups nakamura reported almost temperature - independent resistivity above metallic value k@xmath3co watanabe observed similar temperature evolution n@xmath3co at @xmath18 k kink in in - plane susceptibility indicates antiferromagnetic ordering resistivity increases at @xmath2 k charge - ordering additional magnetic rearrangement kinks in @xmath19 @xmath20 sugiyama obtained similar transition temperatures 60 16 k in metallic k@xmath22co former magnetic ordering temperature from paramagnetic statemean field treatment hubbard model suggested linear spin density wave between 16 60 k helical sdw below 16 k k na ions order 2@xmath23@xmath24 supercell at@xmath25 470 k k na ions tiny energy gap n@xmath3co observed by qian arpes measurements characteristics n@xmath0co superconductivity upon hydration cation ordering suggest behavior sensitive electronic structure k@xmath3co similar n@xmath3co shows differences behavior comparison electronic structures warranted insulating systems k@xmath3co n@xmath3co correlation effects magnetic ordering neglected @xmath26 supercell na / k zigzag ordering adopted @xmath27 hexagonal lattice constant structure comparison between k@xmath0coo@xmath1 na@xmath0coo@xmath1 at @xmath4=0.5 orthorhombic structures na- k - zigzag ordering @xmath26 superstructure based hexagonal structure lattice constant @xmath27 oxygens three site symmetries two @xmath29 one @xmath30 @xmath31 oxygen height from co layersdifference in structures k@xmath3coo@xmath1 has 12 % larger @xmath32 lattice constant data from @xcite for@xmath3coo@xmath1 and k@xmath3coo@xmath1 differences between cobaltates clarified effects due to chemical difference k vs. na size difference structural differences n@xmath3co assigned same structure k@xmath3co denoted@xmath3co@xmath33 band structure near @xmath34 compared with k@xmath3co in fig differences on energy scale evident top valence band in n@xmath3co@xmath33 20 mev higher energy at @xmath35 point @xmath36 bandwidth 5% smaller projected k and na dos almost identical through @xmath36 bands except @xmath37 mev region fermi level na projected dos 20 - 35% larger 50% larger at e@xmath38 ) differences in electronic structure due to k substitution using mullikan charge decomposition obtained atom - decomposed charges displayed in table k ion more ionic than na ion consistent with pdos differencecompensating charge spread over oxygen ions co charges same for k@xmath3co n@xmath3co@xmath33 higher ionicity of k discernible difference between cobaltates unclear what water hydration increases @xmath32 lattice constant two - dimensionality isostructural system shows similar change in @xmath32 lattice constant when hydrated @xmath41 k independent of @xmath42 water effects in cobaltates in transition metal disulfides diselenides@xmath43k shows superconductivity with @xmath46 k 7 increment in @xmath32 lattice constant from k@xmath47co similar to hydrated sodium cobaltate investigated differences in electronic structure between k@xmath3coo@xmath1 n@xmath3coo@xmath1 substantial differences near @xmath34 smaller @xmath36 bandwidth by 60 mev in k@xmath3coo@xmath1 additional fermi surfaces along @xmath48 line flat near @xmath49 point differences due to chemical differences higher ionic character of k structural difference angle - resolved photoemission comparison of systems differences at equal doping levels smallsamples at @xmath4=0.5 not focus study superstructure confined to @xmath4=0.5 results compared structural disorder alkali at @xmath500.5 extends to coo@xmath1 substructure broadens bands hides distinctions suggests spectroscopic studies systems insulating phase at @xmath4=0.5 identify effects alkali cations acknowledge m. d. johannes d. j. singh conversations d. qian clarifying arpes data work supported by doe grant de - fg03 - 01er45876 doe s computational materials science network influence doe s stockpile stewardship academic alliance program wang wu li chen wang luo . 93 *, 147403 ( 2004 ) j hwang yang timusk chou 72, 024549 ( 2005 ) lupi ortolani baldassarre calvani prabhakaran boothroyd 72 *, 024550 ( 2005 ) nakamura ohtake yonezawa iida 65 *, 358 ( 1996 ) compared with data lattice constants sample not exact @xmath9 phase but @xmath51 .assumption supported curie - weiss behavior sample | 0.428163 | 2,653 | 1,414 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,690 | what happens when alice falls into a black hole ? in spite of recent challenges by almheiri _
et al._the `` ' '
firewall hypothesis , the consensus on this question tends to remain `` nothing special '' .
here i argue that something rather special can happen near the horizon , already at the semiclassical level : besides the standard hawking outgoing modes , alice can records a quasi - thermal spectrum of _ ingoing _ modes , whose temperature and intensity diverges as alice s killing energy @xmath0 goes to zero .
i suggest that this effect can be thought of in terms a _ horizon - infinity duality _ , which relates the perception of near - horizon and asymptotic geodesic observers the two faces of hawking radiation . | everybody knows @xcite that a black hole the final state of gravitational collapse @xcite emits a stationary flux of massless particles @xcite . from the perspective of _ asymptotic
_ inertial observers , this hawking flux is indistinguishable from the thermal radiation emitted by a black body at temperature @xmath1 ( in planck units ) , where @xmath2 is the surface gravity of the hole . for macroscopic black holes ( with @xmath3 )
, this value is exceedingly small indeed much smaller than the cmb temperature ; it is therefore unlikely that hawking radiation will ever be measured directly ( at least in the astrophysical context . ) but what if one could get very close to a hole ?
what would hawking radiation look like _ there _ ?
unruh asked this question in his celebrated `` notes on black hole evaporation '' @xcite , where he showed that the correct answer depends on the observer s state of motion : the temperature measured by a particle detector close to the horizon is @xmath4 , where @xmath5 is the detector s acceleration .
consequently , according to unruh , `` a geodesic detector near the horizon will not see the hawking flux of particles '' @xcite . because the near - horizon of a sufficiently massive black hole is almost flat , and the quantum vacuum is as regular there as anywhere else , it is indeed natural to assume that `` nothing special '' happens to geodesic observers at the horizon . yet
, this consensual view has been recently challenged on various grounds . for helfer @xcite ,
taking interactions into account `` completely alters the picture '' drawn by hawking and unruh : ultra - high - energy vacuum fluctuations must couple to quantum gravity , and thus quantum field theory must break down in the vicinity of a black hole . for almheiri _
_ @xcite and braunstein _ et al . _
@xcite , the devil is in the information conservation principle : for hawking radiation to be in a pure state , something `` dramatic '' must happen at the horizon .
pictorially , if alice is entangled with bob but being somewhat braver than him decides to cross the horizon and plunge into the hole , then quantum mechanics will `` burn her up '' .
these new arguments are both exciting and challenging , but let s face it : they are mere speculations . to this day , neither the physics of trans - planckian fluctuations nor the fate of unitarity in quantum gravity are properly understood ; drawing dramatic consequences from them is bold , but risky . what _ is _ well understood , on the other hand , is quantum field theory in curved spacetimes the very setup used by hawking to make his prediction . what does the old semi - classical framework have to say about alice falling into a black hole ?
( 0,-2.958047)(5.50291,2.958047 ) ( 0.6210156,2.5596485)(0.6210156,-2.4403515 ) ( 0.6210156,-2.4403515)(3.8210156,0.75964844 ) ( 3.8210156,0.75964844)(2.2210157,2.5596485 ) ( 0.6210156,2.5596485)(2.2210157,2.5596485 ) ( 1.8210156,1.1596484 ) ( 1.8210156,1.1596484 ) ( 1.8210156,1.1596484)(3.0210156,-0.040351562 ) ( 1.8210156,1.1596484)(0.6210156,-0.040351562 ) ( 0.6210156,-0.040351562)(1.8210156,-1.2403516 ) ( 1.9924707,1.4246484)@xmath6 ( 3.6724708,-0.115351565)@xmath7 ( 2.3524706,-1.4953516)@xmath8 ( 2.2210157,2.5596485)(0.64101565,1.0396484 ) ( 0.7824707,-2.7353516)@xmath9 ( 2.4824708,2.7646484)@xmath10 ( 4.1724706,0.76464844)@xmath11 ( 2.9824708,-0.79535156)@xmath12 ( 3.5824707,2.0046484)@xmath13 ( 3.9610157,-1.2203516)(5.0010157,-0.14035156 ) ( 5.1924706,-0.39535156)@xmath14 ( 1.2524707,2.1646485)@xmath15 consider the simplest possible model of gravitational collapse an ingoing null shell with adm mass @xmath16 coupled to a free , massless scalar field in @xmath17 dimensions and the simplest possible model of alice an unruh - dewitt @xcite detector with energy gap ( frequency ) @xmath18 moving along a radial geodesic @xmath19 with conserved energy ( per unit rest mass ) @xmath0 . in this setup , the answer to `` what does alice see at time @xmath20 ? '' is coded in the response function [ response ] ( , ) = 2_-^du_(u)_0^ds _ ( u - s)e^-isg((u),(u - s ) ) . here
@xmath21 is the two - point function of the field and @xmath22 a smooth , non - negative `` window function '' , such that @xmath23 and @xmath24 for @xmath25 . to compute for a given radial geodesic @xmath19 , only one ingredient from quantum field theory
is needed : the two - point function @xmath21 of the field in the in - vacuum .
the in - vacuum state is best described in terms of what may be called `` eikonal coordinates '' @xmath26 .
these are globally defined , null coordinates , defined for a given spacetime point @xmath6 by tracing back to past null infinity @xmath12 the two radial null rays which meet at @xmath6 ; the coordinates @xmath27 are the eddington - finkelstein coordinates @xmath28 of these rays on @xmath12 , see fig .
[ penrosediag ] . in these coordinates ,
the two - point function @xmath21 in the in - vacuum takes the simple form @xcite @xmath29 notice that , by virtue of the additivity of the @xmath30 , in @xmath17 dimensions alice s detector couples independently to @xmath31 ( the _ incoming _ vacuum modes ) and @xmath32 ( the _ outgoing _ vacuum modes ) .
this property does not hold in higher dimensions , or with massive fields , but for the argument made in this essay , it is key .
let us now ask : when will either of the two contributions @xmath33 to the response function corresponding to the incoming ( @xmath34 ) and outgoing ( @xmath35 ) modes respectively be thermal ? there is a simple criterion for this @xcite : it suffices that , along the trajectory @xmath19 , the quantity ( dot denotes @xmath36 ) [ quasi ] t_=|| is approximately constant , in which case @xmath33 is a thermal spectrum at temperature @xmath37 . here , by `` approximately constant '' i mean @xmath38 .
when this condition does not hold , a weaker form `` thermality '' of @xmath33 still holds in the ultraviolet limit , namely @xmath39 for @xmath40 . in the case of asymptotic inertial trajectories with @xmath41 , as in hawking s original work , one checks that @xmath42 and @xmath43 .
( this is consistent the lore that hawking radiation consists of those modes which have bounced off the center of the shell and escaped from it just before it forms a horizon at @xmath44 ) .
more generally , if @xmath45 , viz .
for inertial observers moving towards the hole at velocity @xmath46 , one computes @xmath47 and t^_-(e)=t_h(e+ ) .
the @xmath0-dependent correction is the doppler factor for an observer moving relative to the a static source located on the center of the black hole . ,
both in the asymptotic limit ( `` asymp '' ) and at the horizon ( `` hor'').,title="fig : " ] , both in the asymptotic limit ( `` asymp '' ) and at the horizon ( `` hor'').,title="fig : " ] but what are the values of when the radial geodesic @xmath19 crosses the horizon that is , when alice jumps into the hole ?
an explicit computation detailed in @xcite shows that , when she crosses the schwarzschild horizon , t^_-(e)=4et_ht^_+(e)=. thus , if alice enters the hole with sufficiently low radial velocity , in the sense that @xmath48 , ( with @xmath49 corresponding to the limit case where she is dropped from the horizon with zero initial velocity ) , she perceives the _ incoming _ modes at _ high temperature _ ! this divergence is confirmed by the computation of the ( outgoing ) _ flux _
@xmath50 , where @xmath51 is the @xmath52-velocity of alice and @xmath53 is a unit vector normal to @xmath51 : at horizon - crossing , this flux reads @xcite ^(e)=t_h^2(2e^2 + ) .
thus , the intensity of hawking radiation perceived by freely - falling observers near the horizon can in fact be arbitrarily high .
observer moreover that the velocity - dependence of @xmath54 and @xmath55 is _ not _ of doppler - type at least not with respect to a single source inside the black hole .
what is going on ? in short the hawking effect , in reverse .
the mechanism for the conversion of vacuum fluctuation into thermal radiation in the standard hawking effect ( observed from infinity ) is well known : it is the _ exponential redshift _ experienced by outgoing modes on their way from the to -
be horizon to infinity .
this is evident from our criterion : if @xmath56 is constant , then by integration @xmath57 is an exponential function of @xmath20 .
now , for a near - horizon observer , it is clear that outgoing modes have had no chance to experience such exponential redshift .
indeed , this is precisely what unruh understood in @xcite , and what led him to conclude that a near - horizon observer will not see the hawking flux of radiation .
but one must not forget that the field also contains incoming modes !
these modes , coming from infinity all the way down to the horizon , _ do experience a very large frequency shift_an exponential blueshift .
this is why @xmath58 is not zero on the horizon , and this is also why @xmath59 have a non - dopplerian dependence on alice s velocity with respect to the hole : in the @xmath49 limit , the `` source '' is infinity not the hole .
limit contributed _ positively _ to the outgoing flux @xmath60 . ] already at the purely classical level , it is well - known that in her free - fall approach to the black hole horizon , alice will feel the sky `` falling down '' on her head : when looking in the direction transverse to her radial motion , she will see an image of the entire sky compressed in a thin layer just above horizon .
the near - horizon hawking effect discussed in this essay is reminiscent of this ( apparent ) inversion effect : seen from a radially infalling geodesic , asymptotic infinity and the horizon itself appear _ dual _ to one another , with the outgoing field modes mapped to the incomes modes and the large @xmath0 regime to the small @xmath0 regime .
explicitly , t_+^(e/2)~t_-^(1/e)e0 .
this identity is , i believe , a rather remarkable feature of hawking radiation .
one may object that this `` horizon - infinity duality '' is imperfect .
first , @xmath61 , while @xmath42 ; second , the thermality of incoming modes is not perfect ( because @xmath62 , but rather @xmath63 , hence thermality holds for high - frequency detectors only ) ; and third , because the @xmath0-dependence of @xmath64 and of @xmath65 holds only for @xmath48 and @xmath66 .
one reason for this asymmetry is clear : the local spacetime geometry at infinity and on the horizon are not the same the former is flat , the latter is not .
suppose however that instead of the schwarzschild spacetime , we considered an artificial black hole geometry in which both infinity _ and _ the horizon are flat ( it is easy to design such a metric and repeat all computations using it instead of schwarzschild@xcite )
. then the local geometries at infinity and on the horizon would be the same , and computing @xmath37 in both limits would lift the first caveat .
i do not know whether the other two caveats are of importance .
after many years of work on the hawking phenomenon , the nature of hawking radiation at the horizon the fact that it appears to be emitted from _
outside _ the hole , and can have _ high _ temperature still surprises us today .
not only is it not always true that `` nothing special '' happens on the horizon , but one needs not go beyond the semiclassical approximation to find some drama near the horizon .
i have attempted to account for this effect by what i called the `` horizon - infinity duality '' : the idea that the hawking effect at the horizon is a reversed image of the standard hawking effect , where the role of ingoing and outgoing modes , and large - energy and small - energy geodesics , are reversed .
the emerging picture is intriguing : for alice dropped just above the horizon , it s not the black hole that looks like a blackbody
it s the sky .
i thank thanu padmanabhan for drawing my attention to the fate of infalling detectors with regards to hawking radiation , suprit singh for the collaboration leading to @xcite , and carlo rovelli and antonin coutant for several useful discussions on black hole physics .
i also note that the particular result @xmath67 was obtained previously in @xcite .
b. s. dewitt , `` general relativity : an einstein centenary survey , '' in _ general relativity : an einstein centenary survey _ , s. w. hawking and w. israel , eds . , pp .
680745 . cambridge university press , 1979 . | black hole final state gravitational collapse emits stationary flux massless particles observers hawking flux indistinguishable from thermal radiation black body at temperature @xmath1 planck units @xmath2 is surface gravity hole for macroscopic black holes with @xmath3 value small than cmb temperature unlikely hawking radiation measured directly if close to hole ? what hawking radiation look like ? unruh asked question notes on black hole evaporation answer depends on observer s state of motion temperature measured by particle detector close to horizon is @xmath4 @xmath5 is detector s acceleration geodesic detector near horizon not see hawking flux near - horizon of massive black hole almost flat quantum vacuum regular natural to assume nothing special happens to geodesic observers at horizon consensual view challenged for helfer interactions alters picture ultra - high - energy vacuum fluctuations must couple to quantum gravity quantum field theory must break down in vicinity black hole for almheiri braunstein devil in information conservation principle for hawking radiation pure state something dramatic '' must happen at horizonalice entangled with bob horizon hole quantum mechanics burn her new arguments exciting challenging speculations physics trans - planckian fluctuations fate unitarity quantum gravity understood dramatic consequences bold risky quantum field theory curved spacetimes used hawking prediction old classical framework alice falling into black hole ?,-2.958047)(5.50291,2.958047 ),2.5596485),-2.4403515(3.8210156,0.75964844 3.8210156,0.75964844)(2.2210157,2.5596485 ),2.5596485) 1.8210156,1.1596484,1.1596484),-0.040351562,1.1596484)(1.8210156,-1.2403516 1.9924707,1.4246484)@xmath6 ( 3.6724708,-0.115351565)@xmath7 2.3524706,-1.4953516)@xmath8 2.2210157,2.5596485)(0.64101565,1.0396484 ) 0.7824707,-2.7353516)@xmath9 ( 2.4824708,2.7646484)@xmath10 4.1724706,0.76464844)@xmath11 2.9824708,-0.79535156)@xmath12 3.5824707,2.0046484)@xmath13 3.9610157,-1.2203516)(5.0010157,-0.14035156 5.1924706,-0.39535156)@xmath14 1.2524707,2.1646485) gravitational collapse null shell adm mass @xmath16 massless scalar field @xmath17 dimensions alice unruh - dewitt @xcite detector energy gap @xmath18 radial geodesic @xmath19 conserved energy unit rest mass answer what alice see @xmath20 ? response function = 2_-^du_(u)_0^ds @xmath21 two - point function field @xmath22 non - negative window function @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 compute radial geodesic ingredient quantum field theory two - point function in - vacuum eikonal coordinates @xmath26 globally defined null coordinates spacetime point @xmath6 past null infinity two radial null rays @xmath6 coordinates @xmath27 eddington - finkelstein coordinates @xmath28 rays @xmath12 see fig . penrosediagcoordinates two - point function @xmath21 in - vacuum form @xcite @xmath29 additivity @xmath30 @xmath17 dimensions alice s detector couples to @xmath31 incoming @xmath32 outgoing property hold higher dimensions massive fields argument essay key when two contributions @xmath33 to response function incoming @xmath34 outgoing @xmath35 modes thermal ? simple criterion @xcite trajectory @xmath19 quantity @xmath36 ) [ quasi t_=|| approximately constant @xmath33 thermal spectrum at temperature @xmath37 approximately constant @xmath38 condition hold weaker form thermality of @xmath33 holds in ultraviolet limit @xmath39 for @xmath40 asymptotic inertial trajectories with @xmath41 work checks @xmath42 and @xmath43 lore hawking radiation modes bounced center shell escaped before horizon at @xmath44 @xmath45 inertial observers moving towards hole at velocity @xmath46 computes @xmath47 and t^_-(e)=t_h(e+ ) .@xmath0-dependent correction is doppler factor for observer moving relative to static source center black hole in asymptotic limit and horizon values of when radial geodesic @xmath19 crosses horizon when alice jumps into hole ? computation in @xcite shows horizon t^_-(e)=4et_ht^_+(e)= if alice enters hole with low radial velocity zero velocity perceives incoming modes at high temperature divergence confirmed by computation of outgoing flux @xmath50 @xmath51 is @xmath52-velocity of alice @xmath53 unit vector normal to @xmath51 at horizon - crossing flux reads @xcite ^(e)=t_h^2(2e^2 + ) intensity of hawking radiation perceived by freely - falling observers near horizon can be arbitrarily high velocity - dependence of @xmath54 and @xmath55 not of doppler - type not single source inside black hole hawking effect in reversemechanism for conversion of vacuum fluctuation into thermal radiation in standard hawking effect observed from infinity known exponential redshift experienced by outgoing modes from horizon to infinity evident from if @xmath56 constant @xmath57 exponential function of @xmath20 for near - horizon observer outgoing modes such exponential redshift unruh understood in @xcite near - horizon observer see hawking flux radiation field contains incoming modes from infinity to horizon experience large frequency shift exponential blueshift @xmath58 not zero on horizon @xmath59 have non - dopplerian dependence on alice s velocity hole in @xmath49 limit source is infinity not hole limit contributed to outgoing flux @xmath60 in free - fall approach to black hole horizon alice sky falling down on head image entire sky compressed in thin layer above horizon near - horizon hawking effect reminiscent of this inversion effect seen from radially asymptotic infinity and horizon appear dual to outgoing field modes mapped to incomes modes large @xmath0 regime to small @xmath0 regimet_+^(e/2)~t_-^(1/e)e0 identity remarkable feature of hawking radiation object horizon - infinity duality '' imperfect @xmath61 @xmath42 ; thermality of incoming modes not perfect @xmath62 @xmath63 thermality holds for high - frequency detectors only @xmath0-dependence of @xmath64 @xmath65 holds only for @xmath48 and @xmath66 asymmetry local spacetime geometry at infinity and horizon not same former flat latter not instead artificial black hole geometry both infinity horizon flat local geometries at infinity horizon same computing @xmath37 in both limits lift first caveat other two caveats importance work on hawking phenomenon nature of hawking radiation at horizon emitted from outside hole high _ temperature surprises us not always true nothing special '' happens on horizon not beyond semiclassical approximation to find drama near horizon attempted account effect horizon - infinity duality '' hawking effect horizon reversed image standard hawking effect role ingoing outgoing modes large small - energy geodesics reversed emerging picture intriguing alice dropped above horizon not black hole sky thank thanu padmanabhan fate infalling detectors hawking radiation suprit singh collaboration @xcite carlo rovelli antonin coutant discussions black hole physics result @xmath67 obtained in @xcite b s. dewitt general relativity einstein centenary survey s w. hawking w. israel eds pp . 680745 cambridge university press 1979 | 0.500546 | 3,244 | 1,722 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,692 | our consistent effort to unravel the mystery of super - chandrasekhar white dwarfs ( wds ) , by exploiting the potential of magnetic fields , has brought this topic considerable attention .
this is also evident from the recent surge in the corresponding literature . in the present work , by means of full - scale
general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic ( grmhd ) numerical analysis , we confirm the existence of stable , highly magnetized , significantly super - chandrasekhar wds having mass exceeding @xmath0 solar mass .
we have explored various possible field configurations , namely , poloidal , toroidal and mixed , by self - consistently incorporating the departure from spherical symmetry induced by a strong magnetic field .
such super - chandrasekhar wds can be ideal progenitors of peculiar , over - luminous type ia supernovae . | with the aim of obtaining a fundamental basis behind the formation of super - chandrasekhar white dwarfs ( wds ) , mukhopadhyay and his collaborators @xcite initiated the exploration of highly magnetized wds and their new mass - limit , significantly exceeding the chandrasekhar limit of @xmath1.@xcite these wds are ideally suited to be the progenitors of peculiar , overluminous , type ia supernovae , e.g. sn 2003fg , sn 2006gz , sn 2007if , sn 2009dc,@xcite which are best explained by invoking the explosion of super - chandrasekhar wds having mass @xmath2 . along with the fact that several wds have been discovered with surface fields @xmath3 g , it has also been known that magnetized wds tend to be more massive than their non - magnetized counterparts.@xcite such observations motivate the theoretical investigation of the effect of a strong interior magnetic field on the mass of a wd . in this context
, we mention that our previous attempts at obtaining highly magnetized super - chandrasekhar wds , assumed _ a priori _ spherical symmetry .
while that may indeed be the case for certain magnetic field geometries , in general , highly magnetized wds tend to be deformed due to magnetic tension . with each new step
we have scientifically progressed towards a more rigorous model starting from a simplistic newtonian , spherically symmetric , constant field model and culminating in a model with self - consistent departure from spherical symmetry by general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic ( grmhd ) formulation , which we explain in the present work ( also , see ref .
we appropriately modify the _ xns _
code,@xcite which has so far been used only to model strongly magnetized neutron stars , to compute equilibrium configurations of static , strongly magnetized wds in the gr framework , for the first time in the literature to the best of our knowledge .
for a detailed description of the underlying grmhd equations , the magnetic field geometries , the numerical technique employed by the _
xns _ code and the values of various code parameters ,
we refer the readers to refs .
we construct axisymmetric wds in spherical polar coordinates @xmath4 , to self - consistently account for the deviation from spherical symmetry due to a strong magnetic field , which generates an anisotropy in the magnetic pressure.@xcite a uniform computational grid is used along both the radial @xmath5 and polar @xmath6 co - ordinates , the number of grid points being typically @xmath7 and @xmath8 respectively .
even higher resolution runs ( for e.g. with @xmath9 and @xmath10 ) require more computational time but do not lead to any significant change in the results . in this work ,
we focus on the equilibrium solutions of high density , magnetized , relativistic wds , which can be described by a polytropic equation of state ( eos ) @xmath11 , where @xmath12 is the pressure and @xmath13 the density , such that the adiabatic index @xmath14 and the constant @xmath15 is same as that obtained by chandrasekhar.@xcite hence , we neglect the possible effect of landau quantization on the above eos which could arise due to a strong magnetic field @xmath16 , where @xmath17 g , is the critical magnetic field.@xcite we recall that the maximum number of landau levels @xmath18 occupied by electrons in the presence of a magnetic field is given by equation ( 10 ) of ref .
1 . the range of central density and maximum magnetic field strength inside the wds considered in this work are @xmath19 gm/@xmath20 and @xmath21 g respectively . consequently , @xmath22 for this range of @xmath23 and @xmath24 , which is large enough not to significantly modify the value of @xmath25 we choose , hence justifying our assumption .
we now explore the effect of various magnetic field geometries on the structure and properties of wds . for a fiducial model , we choose a non - magnetized wd with @xmath26 gm/@xmath20 .
it has a baryonic mass @xmath27 and equatorial radius @xmath28 km , and is perfectly spherical with @xmath29 , @xmath30 being the polar radius ( note that for the definitions of all global physical quantities characterizing the solutions in this work , we refer to appendix b of ref . 13 ) .
# 1 ( # 1 ) figures [ poltor](a ) and ( c ) portray the distribution of baryonic density and magnetic field strength respectively , for the fiducial wd having a purely toroidal magnetic field configuration @xmath31 .
the maximum magnetic field strength inside this wd is @xmath32 g. interestingly , this is a highly super - chandrasekhar wd , having @xmath33 .
note that the value of the surface magnetic field does not affect this result , as long as it is @xmath34 g , which is satisfied in this case . in this context , we mention that the detection of very high surface magnetic fields @xmath35 g is very difficult due to the featureless spectrum.@xcite very importantly , the ratio of the total magnetic energy to the total gravitational binding energy , @xmath36 ( which is much @xmath37 ) . wds with even smaller @xmath38 are also found to be highly super - chandrasekhar ( see figs .
[ rhocf]a and d ) .
this argues for the wds to be stable ( see , e.g. ref .
. the radii ratio , @xmath39 ( which is slightly @xmath40 ) , indicates a net prolate deformation in the shape caused due to a toroidal field geometry .
figure [ poltor](a ) shows that although the central iso - density contours are compressed into a highly prolate structure , the outer layers expand , giving rise to an overall quasi - spherical shape .
interestingly , this justifies the earlier spherically symmetric assumption in computing models of at least certain strongly magnetized wds.@xcite figures [ poltor](b ) and ( d ) show the distribution of baryonic density and magnetic field strength superimposed by magnetic field lines respectively , for the fiducial wd having a purely poloidal magnetic field configuration @xmath41 .
the maximum magnetic field strength attained at its center is @xmath42 g , which also leads to a significantly super - chandrasekhar wd having @xmath43 .
the wd is highly deformed with an overall oblate shape and @xmath44 , which is expected to be stable because its @xmath45 , which is very much @xmath37.@xcite # 1 ( # 1 ) purely toroidal and poloidal field configurations are believed to be subjected to mhd instabilities,@xcite which possibly rearranges the field into a mixed configuration.@xcite hence , for completeness , we also construct equilibrium models of wds with a mixed magnetic field configuration . in figure [ mixed ]
, we present the results for the fiducial wd having the so - called _ twisted torus configuration _
, which compares the distribution of the toroidal and poloidal components of the magnetic field .
this again results in a significantly super - chandrasekhar wd having @xmath46 .
the poloidal component attains @xmath47 g at the center , while the ring - like toroidal component is an order of magnitude smaller .
the wd assumes a highly oblate shape with @xmath48 , resembling the purely poloidal case in all its attributes , and is again expected to be stable having @xmath49 . in a toroidal dominated mixed field configuration,@xcite more massive super - chandrasekhar wds could be possible and is worth further exploration . in this context , we mention that the results in this work have also been reproduced by bera & bhattacharya,@xcite albeit without any novel contribution to the topic .
we also construct equilibrium sequences of magnetized wds pertaining to different field geometries for the fiducial case with @xmath26 gm/@xmath20 .
figure [ rhocf ] shows the variations of different physical quantities as functions of @xmath24 .
the two most important revelations of figure [ rhocf ] are ( 1 ) the wd mass increases with an increase in magnetic field for all the three field configurations discussed above ( see figure [ rhocf]a ) , eventually leading to highly super - chandrasekhar wds and ( 2 ) the magnetic energy remains ( significantly ) sub - dominant compared to the gravitational binding energy for all the cases , since @xmath50 always ( see figure [ rhocf]d ) , which argues for the possible existence of stable , highly magnetized super - chandrasekhar wds .
gm/@xmath20 . ( a )
@xmath51 , ( b ) @xmath52 , ( c ) @xmath53 and ( d ) @xmath38 , as functions of @xmath24 .
the solid ( green ) , dotted ( blue ) and dashed ( red ) curves represent , respectively , wds having purely poloidal , purely toroidal , and twisted torus field configurations .
@xmath51 is in units of @xmath54 .
the filled boxes represent individual wds.,width=528 ]
since our foray into this topic , we have been persistent with our message that the versatile nature of magnetic field is paramount in the revelation of significantly super - chandrasekhar wds , irrespective of its nature of origin : quantum , classical and/or general relativistic which is re - emphasized in the present work . by carrying out extensive , self - consistent , grmhd numerical analysis of magnetized wds
, we have reestablished the existence of highly super - chandrasekhar , stable wds . in order to self - consistently study the anisotropic effect of a strong magnetic field , we have explored various geometrical field configurations , namely , purely toroidal , purely poloidal and twisted torus configurations .
interestingly , we have obtained significantly super - chandrasekhar magnetized wds for all the cases , having mass @xmath55 , and that too at relatively lower magnetic field strengths when the deviation from spherical symmetry is considered as already speculated in our earlier work.@xcite these wds can be ideal progenitors of the aforementioned peculiar , overluminous type ia supernovae .
our work also establishes the necessity of a general relativistic formalism over a newtonian approach while constructing models of magnetized super - chandrasekhar wds .
the authors thank n. bucciantini and a.g .
pili for their inputs with the _ xns _ code .
this work was partly supported by the isro grant isro / res/2/367/10 - 11 and was carried out at the department of physics , indian institute of science , bangalore , india . | basis formation super - chandrasekhar white dwarfs mukhopadhyay collaborators initiated exploration highly magnetized wds new mass - limit exceeding chandrasekhar limit @xmath1 wds progenitors of overluminous type ia supernovae sn 2003fg sn 2006gz 2007if 2009dc explained explosion super - chandrasekhar wds mass @xmath2 several wds discovered with surface fields @xmath3 g magnetized wds more massive non - magnetized counterparts observations motivate theoretical investigation effect strong interior magnetic field on mass wd previous attempts magnetized super - chandrasekhar wds assumed spherical symmetry highly magnetized wds deformed due to magnetic tension progressed towards rigorous model simplistic newtonian spherically symmetric constant field model culminating model self - consistent departure from spherical symmetry general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic ( grmhd ) formulation present work xns _ code used model strongly magnetized neutron stars compute equilibrium configurations of static strongly magnetized wds in gr framework first time literaturedetailed description grmhd equations magnetic field geometries numerical technique xns _ code values code parameters refer readers to refs construct axisymmetric wds in spherical polar coordinates account for deviation from spherical symmetry due strong magnetic field anisotropy magnetic pressure uniform computational grid used along radial polar @xmath6 co - ordinates grid points typically @xmath7 @xmath8 higher resolution runs require more computational time significant change results focus on equilibrium solutions of high density magnetized relativistic wds described by polytropic equation of state eos ) @xmath11 @xmath12 pressure density adiabatic index constant @xmath15 same as chandrasekhar neglect effect landau quantization on eos due strong magnetic field @xmath17 critical magnetic field maximum landau levels @xmath18 occupied by electrons magnetic field given by equation ( 10 ) ref . 1 range of central density maximum magnetic field strength inside wds are @xmath19/@xmath20 @xmath21 g @xmath22 range large not modify value @xmath25 assumptionexplore effect magnetic field geometries on structure properties wds for fiducial model choose non - magnetized wd with @xmath26 gm/@xmath20 baryonic mass @xmath27 equatorial radius @xmath28 km spherical with @xmath29 @xmath30 polar radius for definitions global physical quantities refer to appendix b ref 13 figures(a c portray distribution baryonic density magnetic field strength for fiducial wd toroidal magnetic field configuration @xmath31 maximum magnetic field strength @xmath32 g highly super - chandrasekhar wd @xmath33 . value surface magnetic field affect result @xmath34 g detection of high surface magnetic fields @xmath35 g difficult due to featureless spectrum ratio of total magnetic energy to total gravitational binding energy @xmath36 @xmath37 ) wds with smaller @xmath38 highly super - chandrasekhar wds stable radii ratio @xmath39 @xmath40 indicates net prolate deformation in shape toroidal field geometry figure shows central iso - density contours prolate structure outer layers expand quasi - spherical shapejustifies spherically symmetric assumption in computing models strongly magnetized wds figures d show distribution baryonic density magnetic field strength superimposed by lines fiducial wd poloidal magnetic field configuration @xmath41 maximum magnetic field strength center @xmath42 g leads super - chandrasekhar wd @xmath43 wd deformed oblate shape @xmath44 expected stable @xmath45 @xmath37 toroidal poloidal field configurations subjected to mhd instabilities rearranges field into mixed configuration construct equilibrium models of wds mixed magnetic field configuration figure results for fiducial wd twisted torus configuration compares distribution toroidal poloidal components magnetic field results in super - chandrasekhar wd @xmath46 poloidal component attains @xmath47 g at center ring - like toroidal component smaller wd oblate shape @xmath48 poloidal case expected stable @xmath49 toroidal dominated mixed field configuration more massive super - chandrasekhar wds possible worth further exploration results reproduced by bera & bhattacharya without novel contributionconstruct equilibrium sequences of magnetized wds different field geometries for fiducial case with @xmath26@xmath20 figure [ rhocf ] shows variations physical quantities functions of @xmath24 two important revelations wd mass increases with magnetic field for three field configurations leading to super - chandrasekhar wds magnetic energy remains sub - dominant compared to gravitational binding energy for cases since @xmath50 argues possible existence of stable highly magnetized super - chandrasekhar wds@xmath20 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath38 functions of @xmath24 solid green dotted blue dashed red curves represent wds poloidal toroidal twisted torus field configurations @xmath51 units of @xmath54 filled boxes represent individual wds versatile nature of magnetic field paramount in revelation of super - chandrasekhar wds irrespective extensive numerical analysis of magnetized wds reestablished existence of highly super - chandrasekhar stable wdsstudy anisotropic effect strong magnetic field explored geometrical field configurations toroidal poloidal twisted torus obtained super - chandrasekhar magnetized wds mass @xmath55 lower magnetic field strengths deviation from spherical symmetry wds ideal progenitors overluminous type supernovae work establishes necessity relativistic formalism over newtonian approach constructing models magnetized super - chandrasekhar wds authors thank n. bucciantini a.g . pili inputs work supported by isro grant / res/2/367/10 - 11 department physics indian institute of science bangalore india | 0.355078 | 2,365 | 1,221 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,703 | we have shown that the partition function of the asymmetric simple exclusion process with open boundaries in a sublattice - parallel updating scheme is equal to that of a two - dimensional one - transit walk model defined on a diagonally rotated square lattice .
it has been also shown that the physical quantities defined in these systems are related through a similarity transformation .
recently , much attention has been devoted to the study of two - dimensional walk models and their relations with the one - dimensional driven - diffusive systems @xcite .
the reason is that the partition function of some of these walk models can be related to those of some of the one - dimensional out - of - equilibrium driven - diffusive systems with open boundaries .
one of the most simple and important system of this type is the asymmetric simple exclusion process ( asep ) with open boundaries @xcite .
+ the asep is a widely studied driven - diffusive system which reveals a wealth of interesting critical phenomena .
the asep is defined on a one - dimensional discrete lattice .
the classical particles are allowed to enter the lattice only from the left boundary and leave the lattice only from the right boundary .
the particles also hop unidirectionally toward the right boundary .
it is known that a single product shock measure has a simple random walk dynamics in this system , without any constraints on the parameters of the system , provided that we consider a discrete - time updating scheme . in this case
the particles are injected into the leftmost lattice site with the probability @xmath0 if the target site is empty .
they are also extracted from the rightmost lattice site with the probability @xmath1 if it is already occupied .
we assume that in the bulk of the lattice a particle at a given site @xmath2 deterministically move to the site @xmath3 provided that it is not occupied by other particles , which means that double occupation is prohibited .
+ in this paper we consider the asep with open boundaries in the sublattice - parallel update @xcite .
we are looking for a two - dimensional walk model which shares similar critical properties with the asep .
it turns out that there exists such a two - dimensional walk model as we will describe it later .
these systems have equal partition functions and the physical quantities in these systems are related through a simple transformation .
+ the asep is defined on a lattice of length @xmath4 .
the time evolution of the probability distribution vector @xmath5 is given by the following master equation : @xmath6 the sublattice - parallel updating scheme is defined as follows : we divide the bulk dynamics consists into two half time steps . in the first half time
step the pairs of neighboring sites ( @xmath7 ) for @xmath8 and also the first and the last lattice sites are updated . in the second half time
step the pairs of neighboring sites ( @xmath9 ) for @xmath10 are updated .
considering this definition , the transfer matrix @xmath11 in ( [ time evol ] ) is given by the multiplication of two factors @xmath12 defined as : @xmath13 where @xmath14 , @xmath15 and @xmath16 are given by : @xmath17 the matrix @xmath18 is written in the basis @xmath19 when @xmath20 stands for an empty lattice site and @xmath21 stands for an occupied lattice site .
the matrices @xmath22 and @xmath23 are also written in the basis @xmath24 . + following @xcite we define two different types of product shock measures @xmath25 ( @xmath10 ) and @xmath26 ( @xmath27 ) as follows : @xmath28 note that the position of the shock in @xmath25 lies between two consecutive sites @xmath29 and @xmath30 . at the same time
the shock position lies between two consecutive sites @xmath30 and @xmath31 in @xmath32 .
the authors in @xcite have shown that the time evolution of the shock position in ( [ shocks ] ) governed by ( [ time evol ] ) is similar to that of a simple random walker .
the shock position hops to the left and to the right with the probabilities @xmath33 and @xmath34 respectively provided that : @xmath35 the steady - state of the system @xmath36 which obeys @xmath37 can be written as a superposition of the shocks defined in ( [ shocks ] ) as follows : @xmath38 provided that : @xmath39 in which @xmath40 .
the partition function of the system @xmath41 ( which is also the normalization factor ) is also given by : @xmath42 in the steady - state and depending on whether @xmath33 is larger or smaller than @xmath34 , the system undergoes a phase transition .
the coexistence line occurs where @xmath43 . in both phases
the density of particles on the lattice have exponential behaviors while on the coexistence line it is linear because of considering a superposition of shocks with unbiased random walk dynamics .
+ in @xcite the author has rigorously shown that the steady - state of the asep in a sublattice - parallel update can be obtained using a matrix product method recently reviewed in @xcite . according to this method
we assign an operator to each state of a lattice site in the steady - state .
the two operators @xmath44 and @xmath45 are associated with the presence of a particle and a vacancy at an even lattice site respectively .
the two operators @xmath46 and @xmath47 are also associated with the presence of a single particle and a vacancy at an odd lattice site respectively . for a system of length @xmath4
we associate a product of @xmath4 operators to each configuration of the system consisting of particles and vacancies at different lattice sites .
the unnormalized weight associated with any configuration can be obtained by considering a matrix element of this product .
+ using the matrix product method and in the same basis mentioned above one can rewrite the steady - state of the asep as follows : @xmath48^{\otimes
n } \vert v \rangle \rangle\ ] ] in which the normalization factor is given by : @xmath49 it can be verified that the following two - dimensional matrix representation generates the same steady - state introduced in ( [ ss1 ] ) : @xmath50 given that : @xmath51 note that the two - dimensional matrix representation ( [ matrixrep ] ) also generates the same partition function ( [ z1 ] ) using ( [ z2 ] ) .
in comparison to the matrix representation introduced in @xcite we have adopted an upper triangular matrix representation .
+ in what follows we will define a one - transit walk model consisting of @xmath52 steps on a diagonally rotated square lattice and explain how the partition function of this system can be related to that of the asep studied above .
we will then discuss how the physical quantities in both systems are related through a similarity transformation .
+ consider a random walker moving on a two - dimensional diagonally rotated square lattice .
the random walker starts from the origin @xmath53 and takes @xmath52 consecutive steps until it gets to the point @xmath54 .
the random walker moves in the north - east ( ne ) or the south - east ( se ) direction .
the random walker never takes two consecutive steps in the ne direction along the path ; however , it can take two consecutive steps in the se direction only once during the journey . in this case the random walker moves along a path which crosses the horizontal axis only once .
a typical one - transit path is given in figure ( [ fig1 ] ) .
sketch of a simple one - transit path.,width=288 ] let us assume that the random walker moves along a weighted path . we assign a fugacity to the steps that the random walker takes as follows : *
the fugacity @xmath55 to each step in se direction and the fugacity @xmath56 to each step in ne direction if the ending point is @xmath57 for an odd @xmath2 ( @xmath58 ) .
* the fugacity @xmath59 to each step in se direction and the fugacity @xmath60 to each step in ne direction if the ending point is @xmath57 for an even @xmath2 ( @xmath61 ) . *
the fugacity @xmath21 to all other steps . in order to find the weight of a given path one can simply multiply the fugacities of different steps of the path . the partition function of this system can be easily calculated and one finds : @xmath62 in which : @xmath63 the first term in ( [ z3 ] ) does not play any important role in the critical behavior of the system .
the second term in ( [ z3 ] ) , which is given explicitly in ( [ z4 ] ) , can be reinterpreted as the partition function of a two - dimensional walk model on a diagonally rotated square lattice ; however , one should assign the fugacities to the contact points ( instead of the steps ) in a different way .
we assign a fugacity @xmath64 to each contact point @xmath57 for an even @xmath2 and a fugacity @xmath65 to each contact point @xmath57 for an odd @xmath2 if the contact point is above the horizontal axis .
we also assign a fugacity @xmath66 to each contact point @xmath57 for an even @xmath2 and a fugacity @xmath67 to each contact point @xmath57 for an odd @xmath2 if the contact point is below the horizontal axis . in all cases
we do not assign any fugacity to the contact points with the horizontal axis if they come from the first upward step or the first downward step .
the partition function of this walk model given in ( [ z4 ] ) can now be written using a transfer matrix method as follows : @xmath68 in which the transfer matrix @xmath11 is a two - step transfer matrix defined as @xmath69 .
note that @xmath70 and @xmath71 are each related to two consecutive steps i.e. @xmath70 ( @xmath71 ) is the transfer matrix of two consecutive steps ending to the point @xmath57 for an odd ( even ) @xmath2 ; therefore , one can rewrite @xmath70 and @xmath71 as : @xmath72 by assigning four base vectors to the vertices and contact points of a path one can find a matrix representation for the transfer matrices and the vectors introduced in ( [ tmz ] ) and ( [ tms ] ) . the vectors @xmath73 and @xmath74 for @xmath75 are assigned to the vertices and the contact points of the path as shown in figure ( [ fig2 ] ) .
the base vectors associated with the vertices and contacts.,width=192 ] in an appropriate basis one can write : @xmath76 with the following completeness property : @xmath77 in which @xmath78 is a @xmath79 identity matrix . considering the definition of the weighted walk model
the only nonzero matrix elements are : @xmath80 all other matrix elements are zero . now using ( [ trans ] )
one can easily construct the transfer matrices in the above mentioned basis : @xmath81 and the vectors @xmath82 and @xmath83 are : @xmath84 before going any farther let us investigate the asymptotic behavior of the partition function of the one - transit walk model given in ( [ z4 ] ) in the large-@xmath85 limit .
it can be easily seen that in the large-@xmath85 limit the partition function shows two different behaviors depending on whether @xmath86 or @xmath87 which results in two different phases .
this means that the phase diagram of the walk model depends only on @xmath88 and @xmath89 and not the four independent fugacities .
it turns out that for the case @xmath86 most of the contacts with the horizontal axis will be from below while in the case @xmath87 they will be from above . on the coexistence line where @xmath90 the number of contacts both from above and below the horizontal axis will vary linearly along the horizontal axis .
+ at this point we show that how the partition function of the walk model ( [ z4 ] ) is related to that of the asep given in ( [ z1 ] ) .
it will also leads us to understand how the physical quantities in these systems are related .
let us assume that : @xmath91 now the following similarity transformation connects the two above mentioned systems : @xmath92 in which : @xmath93 it is also necessary to have the following relations : @xmath94 provided that @xmath95 and @xmath96 satisfy ( [ conditions1 ] ) which is achievable since @xmath97 , @xmath98 and @xmath99 are free to be chosen .
it is now easy to check that the partition functions of the two systems in different descriptions given by ( [ z1 ] ) , ( [ z2 ] ) and ( [ z4 ] ) are equal .
+ let us now investigate how the physical quantities in the walk model are related to those in the asep .
we start with the probability of finding a contact at the lattice site @xmath57 for an even @xmath2 from above @xmath100 or below @xmath101 the horizontal axis which is given by the following expressions : @xmath102 in which @xmath103 and @xmath104 are the contact operators at the lattice site @xmath57 from above and below the horizontal axis , respectively .
using the matrix representations ( [ rep1 ] ) and ( [ rep2 ] ) , it is easy to calculate the expressions ( [ contacts1 ] ) and ( [ contacts2 ] ) analytically . + one can also calculate the probability of finding a contact at the lattice site @xmath57 for an odd @xmath2 from above @xmath105 or below @xmath106 the horizontal axis which is given by the following expressions : @xmath107 the contact operators @xmath108 and @xmath109 have the same definitions mentioned above .
+ now we show that how the density of the particles in the asep is related to the probabilities of contacts given in ( [ contacts1])-([contacts4 ] ) . according to the matrix product formalism the density of the particles in an even site @xmath110 ( @xmath2 even ) in the asep in the sublattice - parallel update
is given by : @xmath111 using ( [ st ] ) , ( [ contacts1 ] ) and ( [ contacts2 ] ) and after some straightforward calculations it turns out that ( [ evenden ] ) can be written as : @xmath112 on the other hand , in the same system and using the matrix product formalism the density of the particles in an odd site @xmath110 ( @xmath2 odd ) is given by : @xmath113 using ( [ st ] ) , ( [ contacts3 ] ) and ( [ contacts4 ] ) it is not difficult to show that ( [ oddden ] ) can be written as : @xmath114 in @xcite the authors have already studied both the phase diagram and also the behaviors of ( [ deneven ] ) and ( [ denodd ] ) in the large-@xmath85 limit ; therefore , we do not repeat their results here and the reader can directly refer to those references . on the other hand ,
a description of the phase diagram of the same system based on the traveling shocks has been done in @xcite .
+ in this paper we aimed to show that the steady - state of the asep with open boundaries in a sublattice - parallel update can be described using a two - dimensional walk model .
we showed that the partition functions of these models are equal by properly defining the fugacities assigned to the steps ( or the contact points ) of the random walker . on the other hand
, the probability of finding a particles at a given lattice site in the asep is connected to the probability that the dyck path touches the horizontal axis at that point .
this is valid for both even and odd lattice sites as obtained in ( [ deneven ] ) and ( [ denodd ] ) . | 10 r. brak and j. w. essam , 4183 ( 2004 ) r. brak , j. de gier and v. rittenberg , 4303 ( 2004 ) f. h. jafarpour and s. zeraati , 011119 ( 2010 ) b. derrida , m.r .
evans , v. hakim and v. pasquier 1493 ( 1993 ) g. m. schtz , 4265 ( 1993 ) h. hinrichsen , 3659 ( 1996 ) r. a. blythe and m. r. evans , r333 ( 2007 ) f. h. jafarpour and s. r. masharian , 051124 ( 2009 ) | r. brak j essam 4183 2004 j de gier v rittenberg 4303 2004 jafarpour s 011119 2010 derrida m evans v. hakim pasquier 1493 1993 schtz 4265 1993 hinrichsen 3659 1996 blythe r evans r333 2007 ) h jafarpour masharian 051124 2009 | 0.068017 | 175 | 98 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,714 | -5 mm the target mass effects in polarized dis have been studied .
it was demonstrated that taking into account the first order target mass corrections to @xmath0 a very good approximation of the exact formula is achieved .
it was also shown that their magnitude in the preasymptotic dis region is small except for @xmath1 , where their large effect is partially suppressed by the large values of @xmath2 due to the cut @xmath3 .
the difference between the size of the target mass and higher twist corrections is illustrated .
1.0 cm keywords : polarized dis , structure functions , quantum chromodynamics + pacs numbers : 13.60.hb , 12.38.-t , 14.20.dh = -1.5 cm = -15 truemm * target mass effects in polarized + deep inelastic scattering * * aleksander v. sidorov * + _ bogoliubov theoretical laboratory + joint institute for nuclear research , 141980 dubna , russia _ 0.5 cm * dimiter b. stamenov + _ institute for nuclear research and nuclear energy + bulgarian academy of sciences + blvd .
tsarigradsko chaussee 72 , sofia 1784 , bulgaria _ * + 3.0 cm | one of the features of polarized dis is that a lot of the present data are in the preasymptotic region ( @xmath4 ) . while in the unpolarized case we can cut the low @xmath2 and @xmath5 data in order to minimize the less known higher twist effects
, it is impossible to perform such a procedure for the present data on the spin - dependent structure functions without losing too much information .
this is especially the case for the hermes , slac and jefferson lab experiments .
so , to confront correctly the qcd predictions with the experimental data and to determine the _ polarized _ parton densities special attention must be paid to higher twist ( powers in @xmath6 ) corrections to the nucleon structure functions .
the latter are non - perturbative effects and can not be calculated without using models .
that is why a _ model independent _ extraction of the dynamical higher twists from the experimental data is important not only for a better determination of the polarized parton densities but also because it would lead to interesting tests of the non - perturbative qcd regime and , in particular , of the quark - hadron duality . before one can properly obtain information on the higher twist contribution ,
it is important to take into account in the analysis the so - called target mass corrections ( tmcs ) arising from purely kinematic effects associated with finite values of the quantity @xmath7 .
these are also powers in @xmath6 corrections , however formally related to the twist - two operators and therefore , unlike the higher twist ones , can be calculated without using models . in this note
we present numerical results which illustrate the main features of the tmcs to the spin structure function @xmath0 valid in the preasymptotic dis region .
we consider that their knowledge is useful and important in the qcd analyses of the present and future data on polarized dis at moderate energies .
let us now discuss the numerical results on the target mass corrections to the spin structure function @xmath0 . in our analysis we will mainly concentrate on their features in the preasymptotic dis region ( the invariant mass @xmath19 and moderate values of @xmath20 ) . in the calculations of the target
mass effects we have used for @xmath17 our recent nlo results from @xmath21 fit presented in @xcite . for the further discussion it is useful to rewrite ( [ g1tmc ] ) in the form : @xmath22 where @xmath23 the questions we address here are _
i ) _ how large are the target mass effects in the preasymptotic dis region and _ ii ) _ how fast the series ( [ g1tmc ] ) converges , or in other words how large is the difference between @xmath24 calculated by ( [ g1tmctot ] ) and @xmath25 obtained when the tmcs are calculated only up to the first order in @xmath26 ( the first two terms in ( [ g1tmc ] ) or equivalently , in ( [ g1tmc1 ] ) ) . we will focus on the proton target , but in the end of our discussion we will mention also our results concerning the neutron spin structure function @xmath27 .
note that it is of interest from a theoretical point of view to examine the convergence of the tmcs irrespective to the size of the dynamical ht . for practical purposes , however , there is no sense to use the exact formula ( [ g1tmctot ] ) in the analysis of the experimental data if the dynamical ht are not negligible to those of the tmcs . in this case
the target mass and dynamical higher twist corrections have to be taken into account up to the same finite order in @xmath28 .
the target mass corrections at fixed order in @xmath26 in the expansion ( [ g1tmc1 ] ) are illustrated in fig .
1 where the notations @xmath29 are used .
the tmcs are given outside the resonance region , _
i.e. _ , @xmath30 , where @xmath31 , at different fixed values of @xmath32 ( black curves ) , @xmath33 ( red curves ) and @xmath34 ( green curves ) .
one can see from fig .
1 that the series ( [ g1tmc ] ) , or equivalently ( [ g1tmc1 ] ) , is an alternating series and the size of tmcs of higher then the first order in @xmath26 are small , especially the target mass corrections of third order in @xmath26 , @xmath35 , which are smaller than @xmath36 . = 3.8 in in order to estimate the target mass effects in the preasymptotic dis region we demonstrate also the relative changes of @xmath37 taking into account tmcs up to order @xmath38 , @xmath39 and all orders of @xmath40 ( eq .
[ g1tmctot ] ) .
these effects are presented for @xmath41 ( fig .
2 ) , @xmath42 and @xmath43 ( fig .
3 ) , respectively .
the notations used in these figures are as follows : @xmath44 \nonumber g_1^{{\rm tmc},q^6}&=&g_1(m=0 ) + \sum _ { j=1}^{3 } \left ( { m^2\over q^2}\right ) ^jg_1^{(j)\rm tmc},\\[3 mm ] g_1^{\rm tmc , tot}&=&g_1^{\rm tmc}({\rm eq.~ 3 } ) .
\label{g1q2q6}\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that to calculate @xmath45 we have used the prescription given in @xcite that @xmath46 in the rhs of eq . [ g1tmctot ] vanishes for @xmath47 , where @xmath48 .
= 3.3 in in figures 2 and 3 the dot , dashed and solid curves correspond to the change of @xmath0 proton when the first , third and all orders in @xmath26 , respectively , are taken into account . as seen from these figures , the sign of the target mass corrections depends on the @xmath49 region and the maximum change of the magnitude of @xmath0 due to the first order tmcs is 3.6% at @xmath50 , 6% at @xmath51 and 28.6% at @xmath52 are generally small was first established in @xcite . ] .
the tm effects are large in the large @xmath49 and small @xmath2 region . however , because of the cut @xmath30 , the large @xmath49 region at small @xmath2 is outside of the preasymptotic dis region and their effects are much smaller than those in the resonance one .
one can see also from figs . 2 and 3 that taking into account a first order tmcs to @xmath0 a good approximation of the exact equation ( [ g1tmc ] ) is already achieved .
the deviation of this approximation of @xmath0 from @xmath45 , is not more than 1.5% for @xmath50 , 0.8% for @xmath51 and 1.8% for @xmath53 .
the dashed curves , which correspond to @xmath54 ( the tmcs are taken into account up to a third order in @xmath40 ) , practically coincide with @xmath55 ( solid curves ) , especially in the cases of @xmath51 and @xmath53 .
this observation is a consequence of the fact we have already discussed above that the series of the target mass corrections ( [ g1tmc ] ) is an alternative sign one .
= 3.0 in = 3.0 in in fig .
4 we compare the tmcs to neutron spin structure function @xmath27 with those to @xmath37 . as seen from fig .
4 its magnitude is much smaller than that one in the proton case .
this is due to the fact that the negative @xmath56 crosses zero at @xmath57 and becomes positive at @xmath49 higher than 0.4 @xcite . as a result ,
the values of the moments of @xmath56 in the rhs of ( [ g1tmc ] ) are much smaller than those of @xmath37 .
the main conclusion about the proton tmcs , namely , that the first order tmcs is a good approximation of their total account , holds for the neutron target too .
= 3.2 in finally , we would like to compare the size of the tmcs with that of the higher twist power corrections to the spin structure function @xmath0 .
taking into account only the first order corrections in @xmath6 , @xmath0 has the following form : @xmath58 where @xmath59 are the dynamical higher twist ( @xmath60 and @xmath61 ) corrections to @xmath0 , which are related to multi - parton correlations in the nucleon .
the latter are non - perturbative effects and can not be calculated without using models . in fig .
5 we compare the first order tmcs , @xmath62 ( see eq .
[ notation ] ) , with the values of the ht corrections , @xmath63 , extracted in a model independent way from the world data on polarized dis @xcite .
one can see from fig . 5
that : _ i ) _ in the neutron case the target mass contribution in @xmath0 is negligible compared to the higher twist effects and _ ii ) _ in the proton case the tmcs are essential at @xmath64 while for @xmath65 their magnitude is much smaller than that of the ht corrections .
note also the different shapes of tm and ht corrections .
= 3.0 in = 3.0 in as a result of this analysis we conclude that in the preasymptotic dis region the higher twist contribution in @xmath0 becomes more and more important , so the tmcs can not be trusted alone .
we have studied the target mass effects in polarized dis scattering which would be important in preasymptotic region .
it was demonstrated that accounting for the first order target mass corrections to @xmath0 a very good approximation of the exact formula ( [ g1tmctot ] ) is achieved .
it was also shown that the size of the tmcs in the preasymptotic dis region is small ( @xmath66 ) except for @xmath67 where their effect is a partially suppressed by the large values of @xmath2 due to the cut @xmath68 .
compared to the higher twist effects the contribution of target mass corrections to the spin structure function @xmath0 in the preasymptotic dis region is insignificant except for @xmath64 in the proton case . nevertheless , to extract correctly the unknown high twist effects from the experimental data , the calculable target mass corrections to the spin structure functions should be taken into account .
we would like to thank e. leader for useful discussions .
this research was supported by the uk royal society and the jinr - bulgaria collaborative grants , and by the rfbr ( no 05 - 01 - 00992 , 05 - 02 - 17748 , 06 - 02 - 16215 ) . | polarized dis present data in preasymptotic region @xmath4 ) unpolarized case can cut low @xmath2 @xmath5 data minimize higher twist effects impossible for present data on spin - dependent structure functions without losing information especially for hermes slac jefferson lab experiments confront qcd predictions with experimental data determine polarized parton densities attention to higher twist @xmath6 ) corrections to nucleon structure functions non - perturbative calculated without models model independent extraction of dynamical higher twists from experimental data important for determination polarized parton densities tests of non - perturbative qcd regime quark - hadron duality information higher twist contribution target mass corrections ( ) from kinematic effects finite values of quantity @xmath7 @xmath6 corrections related to twist - two operators calculated without models numerical results features tmcs to spin structure function @xmath0 in preasymptotic dis region useful in qcd analyses present future data polarized dis at moderate energies discuss numerical results on target mass corrections to spin structure function @xmath0analysis concentrate on features preasymptotic dis region invariant mass @xmath19 moderate values @xmath20 calculations target mass effects used @xmath17 recent nlo results from @xmath21 presented @xcite rewrite ( [ g1tmc ] ) @xmath22 @xmath23 questions target mass effects preasymptotic dis region fast series ( [ g1tmc ] ) converges difference between @xmath24 calculated g1tmctot ] and @xmath25 tmcs calculated first order in @xmath26 first two terms g1tmc g1tmc1 ] focus on proton target mention results neutron spin structure function @xmath27 examine convergence of tmcs irrespective to size dynamical ht no sense use exact formula ( [ g1tmctot ] ) experimental data if dynamical ht not negligible to tmcs target mass dynamical higher twist corrections finite order in @xmath28 target mass corrections at fixed order in @xmath26 expansion [ g1tmc1 ] illustrated in fig . 1 notations @xmath29 used tmcs outside resonance region@xmath30 @xmath31 different values @xmath32 black red green curves fig . 1 series [ g1tmc g1tmc1 alternating series size tmcs higher first order @xmath26 small target mass corrections third order @xmath26 @xmath35 smaller @xmath36 = 3.8 estimate target mass effects preasymptotic dis region relative changes @xmath37 tmcs @xmath38 @xmath39 orders @xmath40 [ g1tmctot effects presented @xmath41 . 2 @xmath42 @xmath43 fig . 3 notations figures @xmath44\nonumber g_1^{{\rm tmc},q^6}=&g_1(m=0 )\sum j=1}^{3 }\left m^2 q^2}\right ^jg_1^{(j)\rm tmc} mm g_1^{\rm tmc=&g_1^{\rm tmc} eq. 3 }{g1q2q6}\end{aligned calculate @xmath45 used prescription @xcite @xmath46 g1tmctot vanishes @xmath47 @xmath483.3 in figures 2 3 dot dashed solid curves correspond change @xmath0 proton first third orders @xmath26 sign target mass corrections depends on @xmath49 region maximum change magnitude @xmath0 due to first order tmcs 3.6% @xmath50 6% @xmath51 28.6% @xmath52 small established @xcite tm effects large in large @xmath49 small @xmath2 region cut @xmath30 large @xmath49 region small @xmath2 outside preasymptotic dis region effects smaller resonance one figs 2 3 first order tmcs @xmath0 good approximation equation [ g1tmc ] achieved deviation @xmath0 from @xmath45 not more than 1.5% for @xmath50 0.8% @xmath51 1.8% @xmath53 dashed curves correspond @xmath54 third order coincide with @xmath55 solid curves @xmath51 @xmath53 consequence series target mass corrections [ g1tmc ] ) alternative sign one 3.0 fig . 4 tmcs neutron spin structure function @xmath27 @xmath37 magnitude smaller than proton casedue to negative @xmath56 crosses zero at @xmath57 positive at @xmath49 higher than 0.4 @xcite values moments @xmath56 rhs g1tmc smaller than @xmath37 conclusion proton tmcs first order tmcs good total account holds for neutron target compare size tmcs with higher twist power corrections to spin structure function @xmath0 first order corrections @xmath6 @xmath0 form : @xmath58 @xmath59 dynamical higher twist @xmath60 @xmath61 ) corrections to @xmath0 related to multi - parton correlations in nucleon non - perturbative effects not calculated without models fig . 5 first order tmcs @xmath62 with values ht corrections @xmath63 from world data polarized dis @xcite neutron case target mass contribution in @xmath0 negligible compared higher twist effects proton case tmcs essential at @xmath64 @xmath65 magnitude smaller than ht corrections different shapes of tm and ht corrections in preasymptotic dis region higher twist contribution in @xmath0 important tmcs not trusted alonestudied target mass effects polarized dis scattering important preasymptotic region accounting first order target mass corrections @xmath0 good approximation formula g1tmctot size tmcs preasymptotic dis region small @xmath66 except @xmath67 suppressed large values @xmath2 @xmath68 higher twist effects contribution target mass corrections spin structure function @xmath0 insignificant except @xmath64 proton case extract unknown high twist effects calculable target mass corrections spin structure functions e. leader discussions research supported uk royal society jinr - bulgaria collaborative grants rfbr 05 - 01 - 00992 05 - 02 - 17748 06 - 02 - 16215 | 0.35416 | 2,464 | 1,343 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,716 | the recently discovered superconductivity in mgb@xmath0 has created the world sensation . in spite of the relatively high superconducting transition temperature @xmath1 39 k ,
the superconductivity is understood in terms of rare two gap superconductor with energy gaps attached to the @xmath2 and @xmath3-band . however
, this simple model can not describe the temperature dependent anisotropy in @xmath4 or the temperature dependence of the anisotropic magnetic penetration depth . here
we propose a model with two anisotropic energy gaps with different shapes .
indeed the present model describes a number of pecularities of mgb@xmath0 which have been revealed only recently through single crystal mgb@xmath0 . | the discovery of new superconductivity in mgb@xmath0 took the world by surprise @xcite .
early studies based on polycrystalline samples lead to a two gap model @xcite .
on the other hand the anisotropy in @xmath5 suggested an anisotropic @xmath6-wave model @xcite .
further it is clear that the simple two gap model can not describe the strong temperature dependence of @xmath7 observed in single crystal mgb@xmath0 @xcite . for this
we need an order parameter @xmath8 of oblate shape @xcite . on the other hand
, it is well known that @xmath9 and @xmath10 for single crystal experiments @xcite , which contradicts the ginzburg - landau phenomenology .
further , both magnetic penetration depth data and @xmath11 data suggest a prolate order parameter as in @xcite . indeed , an earlier stm study suggested a prolate order parameter as well @xcite .
is the order parameter prolate or oblate ?
the answer is that we need both .
we suggest , that the oblate order parameter is attached to the @xmath2-band while the prolate order parameter to the @xmath3-band . in the following
we shall describe salient features of single crystal mgb@xmath0 within the present model .
we just point out two features in the upper critical field which are outside of the ginzburg - landau phenomenology .
\(a ) the strong temperature dependence of the anisotropy parameter @xmath7 @xcite . ( b )
second the deviation from the effective mass model @xmath12 @xcite .
for example @xmath13 , where @xmath14 and @xmath15 can describe the temperature dependence of @xmath16 , as has been shown in ref . @xcite . also , by fitting the experimental data we obtained @xmath17 cm / sec and @xmath18 .
we point out that these values are very consistent with the ones for the @xmath2-band @xcite . by fitting experimental data for @xmath19
@xcite close to @xmath20 we can deduce the ratio @xmath21 , implying @xmath22 , for example . this result is bigger than that estimated in our previous analysis of @xmath23 @xcite .
next order correction in @xmath24 leads to the increase of the ratio @xmath25 for the same values of the parameter @xmath26 . in the future we are going to elaborate our study of the upper critical field behavior in mgb@xmath0 by taking into account impurity scattering , what we believe will improve the agreement with experiment
> from @xmath27-axis oriented films and single crystals , the superfluid density @xmath28 and the lower critical fields @xmath29 and @xmath30 have been extracted reliably @xcite .
it is clear this time that we need a prolate order parameter to fit these data .
we choose @xmath31 with @xmath32 .
these values give a good fit of penetration depth data @xcite .
the magnetic penetration depths are related to the lower critical fields via the formulas @xmath33 where @xmath34 and @xmath35 are the magnetic penetration depth with the supercurrent in the ab - plane and in parallel to the c - axis , respectively .
they are related to the superfluid density via @xmath36 and @xmath37 .
taking @xmath38 , which fits @xmath39 from ref .
@xcite , we calculate @xmath40 and obtain the temperature dependences of @xmath29 and @xmath30 from eqs .
( [ eq2 ] ) and ( [ eq3 ] ) , neglecting the temperature dependence of the logarithms . the result is shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] along with the experimental results from ref . @xcite . from these fits
we obtain @xmath41 mt and @xmath42 mt . from this the ratio of the relevant fermi velocities can be estimated as @xmath43 . in other words ,
the corresponding fermi surface is more isotropic and further @xmath44 .
this strongly suggests that the prolate order parameter we are considering has to be associated with the @xmath3-band .
( dashed line ) and @xmath30 ( solid line ) along with the corresponding experimental data from ref.@xcite . ,
we have seen so far that we need two energy gaps of different shape in order to describe @xmath5 and @xmath45 .
the temperature dependence of @xmath16 indicates that an oblate order parameter ( @xmath46 ) dominates the behavior at high magnetic field .
also we need @xmath47 .
this suggests the cylindrical fermi surface associated with the @xmath2-band as the carrier of this order parameter . on the other hand , for @xmath45
we need a prolate order parameter ( @xmath31 ) .
also , the anisotropy in @xmath45 suggests the @xmath3-band as the carrier of this order parameter . in other words , if we assume that the high field properties are controlled by the oblate order parameter attached to the @xmath2-band , while the low field properties are due to the prolate order parameter attached to the @xmath3-band , we have a consistent picture for superconductivity in mgb@xmath0 . | discovery new superconductivity in mgb@xmath0 early studies lead to two gap model anisotropy in @xmath5 suggested anisotropic @xmath6-wave model simple two gap model describe strong temperature dependence of @xmath7 in single crystal mgb@xmath0 need order parameter @xmath8 of oblate shape @xmath9 and @xmath10 for single crystal experiments contradicts ginzburg - landau phenomenology magnetic penetration depth data @xmath11 data suggest prolate order parameter @xcite earlier study suggested prolate order parameter need both oblate order parameter attached to @xmath2-band prolate order parameter @xmath3-band salient features of single crystal mgb@xmath0 model out two features outside ginzburg - landau phenomenology strong temperature dependence of anisotropy parameter @xmath7 deviation from effective mass model @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 describe temperature dependence of @xmath16 fitting experimental data obtained @xmath17 cm / sec and @xmath18 values consistent with @xmath2-band @xcitefitting data @xmath19 close to @xmath20 deduce ratio @xmath21 implying @xmath22 result bigger than previous analysis @xmath23 correction @xmath24 increase ratio @xmath25 same values @xmath26 elaborate study upper critical field behavior mgb@xmath0 impurity scattering agreement experiment from @xmath27-axis oriented films single crystals superfluid density @xmath28 lower critical fields @xmath29 @xmath30 extracted reliably @xcite need prolate order parameter fit data choose @xmath31 with @xmath32 values good fit penetration depth data @xcite magnetic penetration depths related to lower critical fields via formulas @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 - c - axis related superfluid density via @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 fits @xmath39 from calculate @xmath40 obtain temperature dependences @xmath29 @xmath30 from eqs neglecting temperature dependence logarithms result shown in fig . experimental results obtain @xmath41 mt @xmath42 mt ratio relevant fermi velocities estimated as @xmath43 fermi surface isotropic @xmath44 suggests prolate order parameter with @xmath3-band dashed line @xmath30 solid line ) experimental data from ref.@xcite need two energy gaps different shape describe @xmath5 @xmath45 temperature dependence of @xmath16 indicates oblate order parameter @xmath46 dominates high magnetic field need @xmath47 suggests cylindrical fermi surface @xmath2-band carrier order parameter @xmath45 need prolate order parameter ( @xmath31 ) anisotropy in @xmath45 suggests @xmath3-band carrier high field properties controlled by oblate order parameter @xmath2-band low field properties prolate order parameter @xmath3-band consistent picture for superconductivity in mgb@xmath0 | 0.183287 | 1,168 | 627 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,748 | hadron production has been calculated in a pqcd improved parton model for @xmath0 , @xmath1 and heavy ion collisions .
we applied kkp and akk fragmentation functions .
our jet fragmentation study shows , that hadron ratios at high @xmath2 depend on quark contribution mostly and less on the gluonic one .
this finding can be seen in jet - energy loss calculations , also .
we display the suppression pattern on different hadron ratios in @xmath3 collisions at lhc energies . the precision of pqcd based parton model calculations was enhanced during the last decade .
the calculated spectra allow to make predictions not only for the hadron yields , but for sensitive particle ratios and nuclear modifications .
for the calculation of particle ratios new fragmentation functions are needed not only for the most produced light mesons , but for protons also . from the experimental point of view one
requires identified particle spectra by rhic and lhc .
especially the alice detector has a unique capability to measure identified particles at highest transverse momenta via herenkov detectors .
the @xmath4 and @xmath5 ratios can be measured up to @xmath6 gev / c and @xmath7 gev / c respectively . here
we calculate hadron ratios in our next - to - leading order pqcd improved parton model based on ref.@xcite with intrinsic transverse momenta , determined by the expected c.m .
energy evolution along the lines of ref.@xcite .
the presented ratios are based on @xmath8 , @xmath9 and @xmath10 spectra which were calculated by akk fragmentation functions @xcite .
first we compare calculated particle ratios to the data of the star collaboration measured in @xmath11 collisions at @xmath12 @xmath13gev rhic energy @xcite .
predictions for high-@xmath2 hadron ratios at rhic and at lhc energies in most central ( @xmath14 ) @xmath3 collisions are also shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] . on the _ left panel _ of fig .
[ fig1 ] , particle ratios are compared to @xmath11 collisions at @xmath15 @xmath13gev star @xmath16 ( _ dots _ ) and @xmath17 ( _ triangles _ ) data .
the agreement between the rhic data and the calculations at rhic energy can be considered acceptable at @xmath18 gev / c , with an opacity of @xmath19 . however , at lower momenta , where pqcd is no longer reliable , the ratios differ from the calculated curves .
the _ right panel _ shows calculations for @xmath3 collisions for @xmath20 @xmath13tev energy . using a simple @xmath21 estimation
, we expect a @xmath22 opacity in most central @xmath3 collisions . for comparison
, we plotted the @xmath23 and @xmath24 values also .
the lower- and intermediate-@xmath2 variation of the hadron ratios arise from the different strengths of the jet quenching for quark and gluon contributions@xcite . due to the quark dominated fragmentation
, the difference disappears at high-@xmath2 in the ratios . and @xmath17 ratios in @xmath25 collisions at rhic and lhc energies .
rhic curves are compared to star@xcite data at @xmath26 200 @xmath13gev.,title="fig : " ] and @xmath17 ratios in @xmath25 collisions at rhic and lhc energies .
rhic curves are compared to star@xcite data at @xmath26 200 @xmath13gev.,title="fig : " ] acknowledgments : special thanks to prof .
john j. portman for computer time at kent state university .
our work was supported in part by hungarian otka t047050 and nk62044 , by the u.s .
department of energy under grant u.s .
de - fg02 - 86er40251 , and jointly by the u.s . and
hungary under mta - nsf - otka oise-0435701 . | 13 g.g .
barnafldi , p. lvai , g. papp , g. fai and b.a .
cole , arxiv : hep - ph/0703059 ( 2007 ) .
s. albino , b.a .
kniehl and g. kramer , 181 ( 2005 ) ; _ ibid . _ * b734 * 50 ( 2006 ) .
star preliminary data , presented by ming yao on sqm07 conference | barnafldi p lvai papp fai cole hep - ph/0703059 2007 s albino b.a kniehl kramer 181 2005 ibid b734 50 2006 ) preliminary data ming yao sqm07 conference | 0.066262 | 107 | 57 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,749 | we study the 1-loop corrections to the charged higgs production both in the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) and in a more general type ii two - higgs - doublet model ( thdm - ii ) .
we consider the full set of corrections ( including soft photon contributions as well as box diagrams ) , and define a parametrization that allows a comparison between the two models .
besides the soft photon radiation there can be prominent model - dependent effects .
-0.25 in .3 cm _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hep - ph / yymmxxx + pm/96 - 16 + june 1996 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * radiative corrections to @xmath0 linear colliders workshop _ , annecy
gran sasso
hamburg 1995 , ed .
p. zerwas ] * a. arhrib@xmath1 and g. moultaka@xmath2 + @xmath2 physique mathmatique et thorique , e.s.a .
du cnrs n@xmath3 5032 , + universit montpellier ii , f-34095 montpellier france + @xmath4 l.p.t.n .
, facult des sciences semlalia , b.p .
s15 , marrakesh , morocco * radiative corrections to @xmath0 * a. arhrib@xmath1 and g. moultaka@xmath2 + @xmath2 physique mathmatique et thorique , e.s.a .
du cnrs n@xmath3 5032 , + universit montpellier ii , f-34095 montpellier france + @xmath4 l.p.t.n .
, facult des sciences semlalia , b.p .
s15 , marrakesh , morocco | in contrast to hadronic machines , a high energy @xmath5 collider in the tev range will be a rather unique place to discover and study charged higgses in a clean environment . these would be produced either in pairs @xcite , our main concern here , or in ( rare ) production in association with @xmath6 .
it was first found in @xcite that loop corrections from matter fermions and their susy partners ( mainly the @xmath7 sector ) , are likely to change the tree - level result at @xmath8 gev @xcite , by as much as @xmath9 dip in the cross - section .
the effect could even lie between @xmath10 and @xmath11 and perhaps grow out of perturbative control , though in a realistic range of the model - parameters .
such a sensitivity to loop effects appears to be related to the fact that at tree - level the @xmath12 and @xmath13 mediated process is exclusively controlled by @xmath14 gauge invariance and thus knows nothing about the structure of the non - standard extension whatsoever .
it is thus important in a first step to go beyond @xcite and study the full 1-loop structure , in order to understand the sensitivity to the various model - parameters and the origin of large effects , whether in the mssm or in a general thdm - ii . in a second step
one should perform a renormalization group analyses , eventually taking into account constraints from sugra - gut models , and ask whether the allowed regions of the model - parameters could still lead to large or even uncontrollable loop effects in charged higgs pair production . in the present study
we resume the first of these steps and improve upon the results of ref @xcite by including : * a ) * the complete higgs sector contributions ( self - energies , vertices and boxes ) ; * b ) * the infrared part , including initial and final soft photon radiation as well as @xmath15 and @xmath16 boxes ; * c ) * the complete set of charginos / neutralinos/@xmath17/@xmath18 box diagrams ; we performed the analysis in the on - shell renormalization scheme defined in @xcite . since at tree - level
only standard model couplings appear in @xmath0 , we need only to supplement the above scheme with the wave function and mass renormalization conditions of the charged higgs field .
it is also convenient to take the charged higgs mass @xmath19 , rather than that of the cp - odd scalar @xmath20 , as the input on - shell physical mass ( see @xcite for more details ) .
it will turn out that besides the sensitivity to the heavy quark - squark sector , there are on one hand model - independent large effects from the soft photon radiation , and on the other possibly important effects in the vertex corrections involving the purely higgs sector .
the latter case occurs when deviations from the tree - level mssm triple - self - couplings are allowed .
one of the issues will be the possibility of signing a clear difference between the mssm and a non - supersymmetric thdm - ii .
in this section we outline a general parametrization describing deviations from the tree - level higgs self - couplings as given in the mssm .
let us recall first that the most general gauge invariant scalar potential ( corresponding to cp - invariant thdm - ii ) is given by ( see for instance ref .
@xcite ) : @xmath21 & & + \lambda_{4}((\phi_{1}^+\phi_{1})(\phi_{2}^+ \phi_{2})-(\phi_{1}^+\phi_{2})(\phi_{2}^+\phi_{1}))+ \lambda_{5 } ( re(\phi^+_{1}\phi_{2 } ) -v_{1}v_{2})^2+\lambda_{6}im(\phi^+_{1}\phi_{2})^2 \label{pot}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where all @xmath22 are real and @xmath23 , @xmath24 denote the vacuum expectation values of the two higgs fields .
we have also omitted an additive constant in eq .
( [ pot ] ) .
thus one has in general 7 free parameters , i.e. the @xmath22 s and @xmath25 , @xmath26 being fixed by the electroweak scale .
let us now define @xmath27 where the @xmath28 s @xmath29 in general .
it is well known @xcite that ( softly broken ) supersymmetry forces the @xmath28 s to zero . from this
follow the usual tree - level relations among the higgs masses , @xmath30 and @xmath31 , as well as the negative sign of @xmath32 . in this case the triple scalar couplings read ( here we only show those entering the 1-loop corrections in @xmath0 ) : @xmath33 as one can easily see , none of the couplings in eq .
( [ gh ] ) can be enhanced at tree - level in the supersymmetric case . in the non supersymmetric case
however , @xmath34 , there is an important difference between @xmath35 and @xmath36 on one side , and the three remaining couplings of eq .
( [ gh ] ) on the other .
the couplings involving the charged goldstone bosons @xmath37 retain their initial form , so that a possible enhancement is due only to deviations from the supersymmetric higgs - boson - mass sum rules . in contrast
@xmath35 and @xmath36 will deviate from their forms in eq .
( [ gh ] ) through a non trivial dependence on @xmath31 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 , etc ... .
these aspects will be of importance in what follows .
starting from eq.(2 ) it is possible to express all couplings and mass relations in terms of the non - vanishing @xmath28 s , @xmath31 and one of the @xmath22 s .
( the general expressions are somewhat involved and will be given elsewhere ) .
here we would like to insist on a physically interesting special case : it is possible to define a deviation from the mssm in such a way that _ all _ the mssm tree - level relations ] among the higgs masses , @xmath30 and @xmath31 remain valid .
this occurs provided we require the @xmath28 s to satisfy @xmath40 under such conditions we have only three free parameters which we can choose as @xmath31 , @xmath41 and @xmath39 .
the mssm corresponds then to a particular value of @xmath39 , @xmath42 which is a function of @xmath31 and @xmath41 and leads to @xmath43 as a special case of eq .
( [ quasisusy ] ) . for this reason eq .
( [ quasisusy ] ) will be dubbed quasi - supersymmetric .
it can be thought of as corresponding to the situation where all the two - higgs doublet spectrum has been experimentally unraveled and found to be consistent with the mssm higgs mass sum rules but with no other direct evidence for supersymmetry .
although not generic , the quasi - supersymmetric parametrization would then be a very useful device in terms of which the tests of the higgs self - couplings can be expressed .
as far as the charged higgs sector is concerned only @xmath44 and @xmath45 can deviate from their supersymmetric values given in eq.([gh ] ) .
we give here for illustration their behavior in the large @xmath31 limit ( with @xmath46 and @xmath47 @xmath48 where @xmath49 , @xmath50 , @xmath51 , @xmath52 and @xmath53 are given in eq.([gh ] ) .
note that triple couplings of gauge bosons to higgses are never enhanced , and quartic couplings enter exclusively one - loop diagrams that vanish with @xmath54 .
it is thus interesting to note that the sensitivity to large @xmath31 resides exclusively in @xmath35 of eq .
( [ largetbeta ] ) , while @xmath36 is more sensitive to @xmath55 in this limit .
a more general investigation of the full higgs sector can be persued along the same lines .
we now present some numerical results , using the exact expressions for the higgs self - couplings in terms of the 3 free quasi - susy parameters , @xmath31 , @xmath38 and @xmath39 . in fig.1
we show the percentage contribution to the integrated cross section , for each sector separately , as a function of @xmath56 .
one finds that the higgs sector contributions can counterbalance those of the heavy quarks found in @xcite for large @xmath57 , but only near threshold and for @xmath46 .
far from threshold all of the effects , except for @xmath58 boxes , become negative . furthermore the `` neutral '' model - independent contributions , including soft bremsstrahlung , obtained by adding one photon ( or z ) line to the tree diagrams depend loosely on @xmath19 or @xmath56 and contribute at the level of @xmath59 for a soft photon cut @xmath60 . in fig.2
we show ( excluding those `` neutral '' contributions ) the integrated cross - section for two values of @xmath19 and @xmath57 . in thdm - ii the total loop effect increases ( negatively ) with increasing @xmath57 , the farther one goes from production threshold . in the mssm ( @xmath61 )
the leading effects come exclusively from the heavy quark - squark sector and the conclusions of @xcite remain unaltered in this case .
the @xmath62/@xmath18 contributions do not exceed a few percent despite the large number of diagrams .
for instance we evaluated the full set of supersymmetric boxes , ( taking into account fermion - number violation through the rules of ref .
@xcite ) , and found that they largely cancel among each other , leading at most to @xmath63 ( negative ) effect for a wide range of sparticle masses .
finally we should stress that the large effects in thdm - ii are not an artifact of the quasi - susy parametrization , they are also present even if the tree - level higgs mass sum rules are relaxed .
this raises the question of whether such effects would appear in the mssm as a result of the running of the @xmath22 s @xcite .
we conclude that the charged higgs sector seems to offer a non - trivial structure beyond the tree - level , which can complement the information gained from the neutral sector .
yet a more elaborate strategy involving the full - fledged higgs sector still needs to be worked out .
99 s. komamiya , phys.rev .
d38 ( 1988 ) 2158 ; a. arhrib , m. capdequi peyranere , g. moultaka phys.lett .
b 341 ( 1995 ) 313 ; m.bhm , w.hollik and h.spiesberger , fortschr.phys.34 ( 1986 ) 11 ; a.brignole et al . , in proceedings of the workshop on @xmath64 collisions at @xmath65 gev
: + the physics potential , ed .
p.m.zerwas , desy 92 - 123 , p.613 ; + a.djouadi , j.kalinowski , p.m.zerwas , _ ibid .
_ p.83 and z.phys.c57 ( 1993 ) 569 ; j.f.gunion and h.e.haber , nucl .
b272 ( 1986 ) 1 ; a.denner , h.eck , o.hahn and j.kbelbeck nucl .
b387 ( 1992 ) 467 ; h.e . haber and r. hempfling ,
d48 ( 1993 ) 4280 ; | contrast to hadronic machines high energy @xmath5 collider tev range unique place study charged higgses clean environment produced in pairs @xcite or rare production with @xmath6 found in @xcite loop corrections from matter fermions partners @xmath7 sector change tree - level result at @xmath8 gev @xcite @xmath9 dip cross - section effect could between @xmath10 and @xmath11 grow out of control range model sensitivity to loop effects related tree - level @xmath12 @xmath13 process controlled by @xmath14 gauge invariance structure non - standard extension important beyond @xcite study full 1-loop structure understand sensitivity to model - parameters origin of large effects second step perform renormalization group analyses constraints from sugra - gut models ask allowed regions model lead to large uncontrollable loop effects in charged higgs pair productionpresent study resume steps improve results ref @xcite including complete higgs sector contributions self - energies vertices boxes infrared part initial final soft photon radiation @xmath15 @xmath16 boxes complete charginos neutralinos@xmath17@xmath18 box diagrams performed analysis on - shell renormalization scheme @xcite tree - level standard model couplings @xmath0 supplement scheme wave function mass renormalization conditions charged higgs field convenient take charged higgs mass @xmath19 input on - shell physical mass see @xcite details sensitivity heavy quark - squark sector model - independent effects soft photon radiation important effects vertex corrections purely higgs sector latter case occurs deviations from tree - level mssm triple - self - couplings allowed difference between mssm non - supersymmetric thdm - ii outline general parametrization describing deviations from tree - level higgs self - couplings mssm general gauge invariant scalar potential cp - invariant thdm - ii given@xcite @xmath21\lambda_{4}\phi_{1}^+\phi_{1})(\phi_{2}^+{2}-\phi_{1}^+\phi_{2})({2}^+\phi_{1}\lambda_{5 }(\phi^+_{1}\phi_{2 } -v_{1}v_{2})^2+\lambda_{6}im(\phi^+_{1}\phi_{2})^2 \label{pot}{aligned} @xmath22 real @xmath23 @xmath24 denote vacuum expectation values higgs fields omitted additive constant in eq . 7 free parameters @xmath22 s @xmath25 @xmath26 fixed by electroweak scale define @xmath27 @xmath28 s @xmath29 supersymmetry forces @xmath28 s to zero tree - level relations among higgs masses @xmath30 @xmath31 negative sign @xmath32 triple scalar couplings @xmath33 couplings eq enhanced tree - level supersymmetric case non supersymmetric case @xmath34 important difference between @xmath35 @xmath36 three remaining couplings eq .couplings charged goldstone bosons @xmath37 retain initial form enhancement due to deviations from supersymmetric higgs - boson - mass sum rules @xmath35 @xmath36 deviate from forms in eq . ( ) through dependence on @xmath31 importance follows starting from eq.(2 ) possible express couplings mass relations non - vanishing @xmath28 s @xmath31 @xmath22 s general expressions special case define deviation from mssm mssm tree - level relations among higgs masses @xmath30 @xmath31 remain valid @xmath28 s satisfy @xmath40 three free parameters @xmath31 @xmath41 @xmath39 mssm corresponds to value of @xmath39 @xmath42 function of @xmath31 and @xmath41 leads to @xmath43 special case of eq . ( quasisusy eq . ( [ quasisusy ] ) dubbed quasi - supersymmetric two - higgs doublet spectrum unraveled consistent with mssm higgs mass sum rules no direct evidence for supersymmetry quasi - supersymmetric parametrization useful tests higgs self - couplingscharged higgs sector @xmath44 @xmath45 deviate from supersymmetric values eq.([gh ] behavior in @xmath31 limit with @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 in eq.([gh ] ) triple couplings gauge bosons to higgses enhanced quartic couplings enter one - loop diagrams vanish with @xmath54 to @xmath31 in @xmath35 @xmath36 sensitive to @xmath55 investigation full higgs sector numerical results expressions higgs self - couplings 3 free quasi - susy parameters @xmath31 @xmath38 @xmath39.1 percentage contribution to integrated cross section each sector function of @xmath56 higgs sector contributions counterbalance heavy quarks in for @xmath57 near threshold @xmath46 far from threshold effects @xmath58 boxes become negative neutral model - independent contributions soft bremsstrahlung adding one photon line tree diagrams depend on @xmath19 or @xmath56 contribute at level @xmath59 for soft photon cut @xmath60 fig.show excluding neutral contributions integrated cross - section for @xmath19 @xmath57 thdm - ii total loop effect increases negatively @xmath57 farther from production threshold mssm @xmath61 leading effects from heavy quark - squark sector conclusions @xcite unaltered @xmath62/@xmath18 contributions exceed few percent despite large number diagrams evaluated supersymmetric boxes - number violation cancel leading to @xmath63 negative effect wide range sparticle masses large effects in thdm - ii not artifact quasi - susy parametrization present tree - level higgs mass sum rules relaxed raises question effects in mssm running @xmath22 s @xcite charged higgs sector non - trivial structure beyond tree - level complement information neutral sector elaborate strategy full - fledged higgs sector needs komamiya.rev . d38 ( 1988 ) 2158 arhrib capdequi moultaka phys.lett . b 341 ( 1995 ) 313.hollik.spiesberger fortschr.phys.34 ( 1986 ) 11.brignole proceedings workshop on @xmath64 collisions at @xmath65 physics potentialzerwas 92 123 p.613.djouadi.kalinowski.zerwas p.83 z.phys.c57 1993 ) j.f.gunion h.haber b272 1986 ) a.denner h.eck o.hahn j.kbelbeck b387 1992 ) 467 haber hempfling d48 1993 ) 4280 | 0.429487 | 2,602 | 1,405 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,757 | we report the results of a calculation of the neutrino- and antineutrino - induced @xmath0-ray production cross section for oxygen target .
our analysis is focused on the kinematical region of neutrino energy larger than @xmath1200mev , in which single - nucleon knockout is known to be the dominant reaction mechanism .
the numerical results have been obtained using a realistic model of the target spectral function , extensively tested against electron - nucleus scattering data .
we find that at neutrino energy 600 mev the fraction of neutral - current interactions leading to emission of @xmath0-rays of energy larger than 6 mev is @xmath141% , and that the contribution of the @xmath2 state is overwhelming .
+ + _ invited paper to nufact 11 , xiiith international workshop on neutrino factories , super beams and beta beams , 1 - 6 august 2011 , cern and university of geneva + ( submitted to iop conference series ) _ the observation of @xmath0 rays originating from nuclear deexcitation can be exploited to identify neutral - current ( nc ) neutrino - nucleus interactions in a broad energy range . following the pioneering studies of nuclear excitations by neutral weak currents of refs .
, theoretical calculations of the cross section of @xmath0-ray production from nc neutrino - oxygen interactions have been carried out in the neutrino energy range @xmath3500 mev @xcite .
neutrons , while providing @xmath150% of nc events , do not emit cherenkov light . as a consequence ,
the availability of an alternative signal allowing one to identify nc interactions is very important .
events with @xmath0 rays of energy above the observational threshold of 5 mev can be detected in a water cherenkov detector , like super - kamiokande , and contribute up to @xmath15% of the total event number @xcite , independent of neutrino oscillations .
note that in water @xmath190% ( 16 out of 18 ) of the nc interactions take place in oxygen . at low energy , elastic scattering and inelastic excitation of discrete nuclear states provide the main contribution to the neutrino - nucleus cross section .
however , at @xmath4 mev the cross section associated with these processes tends to saturate , and quasielastic ( qe ) nucleon knockout becomes the dominant reaction mechanism .
if the residual nucleus is left in an excited state , these processes can also lead to @xmath0-ray emission . in the qe regime ,
neutrino - nucleus scattering reduces to the incoherent sum of elementary scattering processes involving individual nucleons , the energy and momentum of which are distributed according to the target spectral function @xcite . a schematic representation of nc qe neutrino - nucleus scattering is given in fig .
[ fig1 ] , where the dashed line represents the threshold for nucleon emission in the continuum .
low - lying excited levels of the residual nuclei produced in @xmath5[8]{o}(\nu,\nu'n)$ ] scattering.,scaledwidth=72.0% ] low - lying excited levels of the residual nuclei produced in @xmath5[8]{o}(\nu,\nu'n)$ ] scattering.,scaledwidth=96.0% ] in this paper , we discuss the emission of @xmath0 rays arising from the decay of the residual nuclei of the reactions @xmath6[8]{o}\rightarrow \nu+p+\isotope[15][7]{n}^*$ ] , or @xmath6[8]{o}\rightarrow \nu+n+\isotope[15][8]{o}^*$ ] , the cross sections of which have been computed using a realistic model of the oxygen spectral function . note that the presented formalism applies also to antineutrino - induced @xmath0-ray production . in our approach , covered in detail in ref .
@xcite , the cross section of @xmath0-ray production following a nc qe interaction , @xmath7 , is written in the form @xmath8[8]{o } \to \nu + \gamma + y
+ n ) = \sum_\alpha\sigma(\nu + \isotope[16][8]{o } \to \nu+x_\alpha + n ) \:\textrm{br}(x_\alpha \to \gamma + y),\ ] ] where @xmath9 is the knocked out nucleon , @xmath10 denotes the residual nucleus in the state @xmath11 , and @xmath12 is the system resulting from the electromagnetic decay of @xmath10 , e.g. , , @xmath13[7]{n } + n$ ] , or @xmath13[6]{c } + p$ ] @xcite .
the energy spectrum of the states of the residual nuclei is schematically illustrated in fig .
[ fig2 ] .
the branching ratios br@xmath14 have been taken from ref . .
the nc qe cross section , @xmath15[8]{o } \to \nu+x_\alpha + n)$ ] , has been calculated within the approach discussed in ref .
@xcite for the case of charged - current interactions .
it may be expressed as @xmath16 where @xmath17 , @xmath18 being the nucleon mass , @xmath19 denotes the elementary neutrino - nucleon cross section and the spectral function @xmath20 yields the probability of removing a nucleon of momentum @xmath21 from the target leaving the residual nucleus with energy @xmath22 , @xmath23 being the target ground - state energy .
according to the shell model , nuclear dynamics can be described by a mean field . in the simplest implementation of this model , protons in the @xmath5[8]{o}$ ]
nucleus occupy three single - particle states , @xmath24 , @xmath25 , and @xmath26 , with removal energy 12.1 , 18.4 , and @xmath142 mev , respectively @xcite .
the neutron levels exhibit the same pattern , see fig .
[ fig1 ] , but are more deeply bound by 3.54 mev @xcite . as a consequence of a mean field dynamics , knock out of a target nucleon leaves the residual system in a bound state , and the spectral function can be conveniently written in the form @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the momentum - space wave function associated with the @xmath11-th shell - model state and the sum is extended to all occupied states belonging to the fermi sea @xmath29 . the _ occupation probability _ @xmath30 and the ( unit - normalized ) function @xmath31 , describing the energy width of the @xmath11-th state , account for the effects of nucleon - nucleon ( nn ) correlations , not included in the mean field picture . in the absence of correlations , @xmath32 and @xmath33 .
a realistic model of the proton spectral function of oxygen has been obtained within the local density approximation ( lda ) , combining the experimental data of ref .
@xcite with the results of theoretical calculations of the correlation contribution in uniform nuclear matter at different densities @xcite .
the results reported in ref .
@xcite show that the lda spectral function provides an accurate description of the inclusive electron - oxygen cross sections at beam energies around 1 gev .
in addition , it predicts a nucleon momentum distribution in agreement with that obtained from the data of ref .
@xcite . as pointed out in ref .
@xcite , nucleon - knockout experiments measure _ spectroscopic strengths _ , not occupation probabilities .
spectroscopic strengths are given by the area below the sharp peaks observed in the missing - energy spectra , corresponding to knockout of a nucleon occupying one of the shell - model states , corrected to take into account final - state interactions .
on the other hand , occupation probabilities include contributions corresponding to larger removal energy , arising from mixing of the one - hole state with more complex final states @xcite .
@l|lll@ @xmath11 & @xmath34 & @xmath2 & @xmath35 + @xmath36 & 0.632 & 0.703 & 0.422 + br@xmath37 & 0% & 100% & @xmath38% + cross section for @xmath0-ray production following nc qe interaction of neutrino ( solid line ) and antineutrino ( long - dashed line ) compared to the nc qe cross section of neutrino ( dotted line ) and antineutrino ( short - dashed line ) .
only the photons of energy larger that 6 mev are considered . ]
the @xmath34 , @xmath2 and @xmath35 spectroscopic strengths have been computed by integrating the oxygen spectral function of refs .
@xcite over the energy ranges @xmath39 mev , @xmath40 mev , and @xmath41 mev , respectively . dividing these numbers by the degeneracy of the shell - model states , one obtains the quantities @xmath36 listed in table [ tab1 ] .
the same spectroscopic strengths have been used for protons and neutrons .
the branching ratios @xmath42 , necessary to calculate the cross section @xmath7 according to eq . , are collected in table [ tab1 ] . in the case of the @xmath34-proton ( neutron )
knockout , the residual nucleus is ( ) produced in its ground state . hence , no @xmath0-rays are produced .
as the @xmath2-proton ( neutron ) hole lies below the nucleon - emission threshold , 10.21 mev ( 7.30 mev ) , it always deexcites through photon emission with half - life @xmath43 fs ( less than 1.74 fs ) @xcite .
when a proton ( neutron ) is knocked out from the deepest @xmath35 shell , the excitation energy is high enough for many deexcitation channels to open , of which only two , @xmath13[6]{c}+p$ ] and @xmath13[7]{n}+n$ ] ( @xmath13[6]{c}+p$ ] and @xmath44[6]{c}+\alpha$ ] ) , yield photons of energy higher than 6 mev ( see fig . [ fig2 ] ) . in fig .
[ fig4 ] our results for the neutrino- and antineutrino - induced @xmath0-ray production cross section are compared to the neutrino and antineutrino nc qe cross sections .
the error bands show the uncertainties arising form the determination of the spectroscopic strengths ( 5.4% ) , the treatment of pauli blocking ( 1% ) , and the branching ratio of the @xmath35 state ( 1% ) .
the @xmath7 s dependence on neutrino energy is very similar , although not identical , to that of the nc qe cross section .
the discrepancy arises from difference between the average removal energy associated with the whole spectral function and the energy of the @xmath2 shell , yielding the overwhelming contribution to @xmath7 .
the neutrino - induced @xmath0-production cross section reaches its maximum at @xmath45 gev and is slowly decreasing at larger energies . on the other hand ,
the corresponding antineutrino cross section is an increasing function of @xmath46 . in conclusion ,
we have computed the neutrino- and antineutrino - induced @xmath0-ray production cross section for oxygen target , focussing on the kinematical region in which single - nucleon knockout dominates .
considering photons of energy larger than 6 mev , we find that the @xmath2 state provides the overwhelming contribution , and that the ratio @xmath47 , exhibiting a significant energy - dependence at @xmath48 gev , is @xmath141% at @xmath49mev .
our results , obtained using a realistic model of the target spectral function , provide an accurate estimate of a signal that can be exploited to identify neutral - current events in water - cherenkov detectors .
this work was supported by infn ( grant mb31 ) , miur prin ( grant `` many - body theory of nuclear systems and implications on the physics of neutron stars '' ) , and in part by the grant - in - aid from the japan society for promotion of science ( nos .
21224004 and 23340073 ) .
a.m.a . was supported by the polish ministry of science and higher education under grant no . 550/mob/2009/0 . | 99 donnelly t w , hitlin d , schwartz m , walecka j d and wiesner s j 1974 _ phys .
_ b * 49 * 8 | donnelly t hitlin schwartz walecka wiesner s 1974 phys . 49 8 | 0.065281 | 40 | 23 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,758 | for most physical processes the tracks observed in the muon stations must be matched with the corresponding tracks in the inner tracker , the external muon system providing muon identification and triggering but the tracker points giving the precise momentum measurement at lower momenta .
for high momenta the momentum resolution is much improved by the interconnection of inner and outer measurements .
the matching of outer and inner measurements is more delicate in case of muons embedded in jets .
a study of the matching procedure was carried out using samples of @xmath0 jets at high p@xmath1 , requiring @xmath0 @xmath2 @xmath3 decays . * cms note 1999/057 * * muon track matching * + a. benvenuti + infn , bologna , italy + d. denegri + dapnia , saclay , france + v. genchev , p. vankov + inrne , sofia , bulgaria + a. khanov , n. stepanov + itep , moscow , russia
+ ( november 1 , 1999 ) | identification and measurement of muons in the inner tracker using its high spatial resolution and excellent momentum measurement in the 4 t field is a very important and demanding task , particularly for muons in jets . in the muon system
the occupancy is low and pattern recognition is relatively easy , provided the particle reaches the muon system at all , which is the case for the barrel is p@xmath4 4 gev . for non - isolated muons
the main difficulty is to match the track observed in the muon stations with the correct candidate in the inner tracker in case of the high track density inside a jet .
these situations arise for example in muon tagging of @xmath5-jets , in @xmath5 @xmath2 @xmath6(@xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath3 ) + @xmath7 cascades in @xmath5 and @xmath8 physics , in susy(@xmath9 , @xmath10 ) physics and most dramatically in very high e@xmath1 ( tev scale ) jets such as heavy flavour ( @xmath5 , @xmath11 ) qcd jets giving rise to `` muon bundles '' within jets .
the matching strategy is based on the use of the full parameter space , i.e. on both the reconstructed momentum and the position in a given plane for the two tracks , one in the muon system and the other in the inner tracker .
the quantities monitored are the efficiency of matching ( number of muons matched over number of muons reconstructed ) , the muon matching impurity ( 1 - number of muons matched over number of tracks matched ) and generation of `` ghost '' and `` fake '' tracks .
the results discussed here are obtained using a detailed geant description of the complete cms detector of tdr design . in all simulations the effects of the 4 t field are fully included .
we have performed a geant simulation of the response to @xmath0 jets with transverse momenta p@xmath12 of 50 , 100 and 200 gev ( which corresponds to the p@xmath1 range of @xmath5-jets in @xmath13 production ) and at least one muon inside each jet with p@xmath14 @xmath15 5 gev in the rapidity region -1.1
@xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath16 1.1 .
1000 events were generated and reconstructed in the barrel part at each energy point .
the results are obtained using the standard cms reconstruction procedure ( data card muon 2 and trak 3 ) existing in the cmsim version 115 .
pattern recognition in the muon stations is done by building track segments from the reconstructed hits separately in the ( r,@xmath18 ) and ( r , z ) planes ; ( r@xmath18,rz ) track segments in the same muon station and in the same or contiguous ( r,@xmath18 ) sectors are considered to form a pair used to perform the kalman filter .
this is done starting from the outermost stations and proceeding towards the inner stations with a constrained fit to the impact point ( ip ) with default values of @xmath19 = 15 @xmath20 and @xmath21 = 5.3 cm .
since the decay mean transverse length ( impact parameter ) of the @xmath5-quarks is about 500 @xmath20 another reconstruction was made using a constrained fit to the impact point with @xmath19 = 500 @xmath20 and @xmath21 = 5.3 cm .
the global track finder ( gtf ) was used for pattern recognition in the cms inner tracker . the gtf algorithm adopted for the cms tracker must process a large number of hits per event : typically 5.10@xmath22 hits at low luminosity and ten times more at high luminosity . to overcome the severe combinatorial problems , the concept of road preselection is used in the first stage of the algorithm . in the second stage a kalman filter
is used to carry out final hit selection and track fitting .
given two track segments , one in the muon system and the other in the inner tracker , one can extrapolate both segments to a common plane or point , check the difference in momentum and position and select the best combination among the candidates .
the correct combination is known from the simulation procedure and it is therefore possible to calculate the efficiency of matching .
we use as a matching criterion the minimal distance computed from @xmath17 , @xmath18 and/or p@xmath23 of the two track candidates at the outer plane ( trci - cmsim convention ) of the inner tracker and at the impact point .
association of reconstructed tracks to geant ones is done on the hit basis .
the reconstructed track is associated to a given geant particle number if more than half of the hits assigned to the track are from that particular geant track .
if there is no such dominating track , the reconstructed track is called a `` ghost '' .
if more than one reconstructed track is matched to a given geant number it is called a `` fake '' . the @xmath17 dependence of the reconstruction efficiency obtained for the barrel muon station , shown on fig .
1a ) is rather uniform except for the region between the central and next - to - central rings ( @xmath24 @xmath16 0.2 ) and for @xmath24 @xmath15 0.9 . to avoid the influence of the @xmath17 dependence of the reconstruction efficiency on the matching results the tracks with @xmath24 @xmath15 0.9
are removed . the p@xmath1 reconstruction efficiency ( fig .
1b ) ) is more than 95% for the tracks with p@xmath14 @xmath15 10 gev . in fig .
1c ) is given the `` type '' of reconstructed tracks in the muon stations ( solid line ) for which must be found the best candidate between the tracks reconstructed in the tracker ( error bars ) .
the comparison between reconstructed and generated variables : p@xmath1 , @xmath17 and @xmath18 is given in fig .
1d ) - fig .
1i ) both for the barrel muon stations and for the inner tracker , for p@xmath12 = 100 gev .
we find a p@xmath1 muon resolution of about 10% for the muon stations alone , and of @xmath16 1% for the inner tracker , in good agreement with the values given in the muon and tracker tdrs@xmath25 . to estimate the matching quality a @xmath26 is formed from the differences between reconstructed @xmath17 , @xmath18 and p@xmath1 in the two detectors for all reconstructed track combinations at the outer tracker plane and at the impact point : @xmath27 including in the @xmath26 , equation ( 1 ) , the contribution from p@xmath23 in the muon stations and the tracker improves the selection of the matching tracks mainly for the high transverse momenta .
a minimal @xmath26 of the matching tracks has been used as a matching criterion . the p@xmath1 dependence of the matching efficiency is shown on fig . 2 for p@xmath12 = 50 , 100 and 200 gev at the outer plane trci of the inner tracker and at the interaction point with the two assumptions for the constrained fit to the impact point with @xmath28 = 15 @xmath20 and @xmath28 = 500 @xmath20 .
the degradation of the matching efficiency at higher p@xmath12 is is due to the increase of charged particle multiplicity inside jets which makes more difficult the correct association of the tracks observed in the muon stations with the track candidates in the inner tracker .
the matching efficiency shows less variation when a constrained fit at the impact point is performed using @xmath28 = 500 @xmath20 .
results obtained from the matching of muons inside the @xmath0 jets at p@xmath12 of 50 , 100 and 200 gev are summarized in table 1 .
the `` type '' of the matched tracks indicates a higher purity at the impact point and at lower jet momenta . for the higher multiplicity and more collimated jets at p@xmath12 = 200 gev
, the impurity in matching degrades to a @xmath29 7% level . rejecting tracks with an increasing momentum threshold @xmath16 p@xmath30 ,
a high matching efficiency and purity of track matching can be obtained for high p@xmath12 , but at the expense of a substantial reduction in statistics .
the number of `` ghost '' tracks generated at reconstruction in the muon stations is negligible .
the number of `` fake '' tracks shows some tendency to increase with jets momenta , and is at level of 1% - 2% . after performing the matching procedure we can assign to the tracks observed in the muon station the precise measurements from the tracker .
the distributions of the differences between reconstructed and generated values of p@xmath1 , @xmath17 and @xmath18 at the impact point for the matched tracks at p@xmath12 = 100 gev are given in fig .
3 . these distributions are practically the same as in fig .
2 , where we compared reconstructed and generated variables for the inner tracker , confirming the good quality of the matching criterion . the bottom row in fig .
3 gives the `` type '' of the tracks reconstructed in the muon stations and the `` type '' of matched tracks at the impact point .
the quality of track matching can be measured by the value of the `` pull '' : @xmath31 where : z@xmath32 , z@xmath33 is the track charge in the tracker and the muon station ; p@xmath32 , p@xmath33 is the reconstructed momentum in tracker and muon station ; cov(1/p.1/p ) is the covariance matrix . a gaussian fit to the pull shown at the bottom of fig .
3 gives @xmath34 @xmath29 1.0 indicating a good accuracy for the selection and matching of the tracks .
the main results concerning the matching of muon tracks in ( @xmath0 ) jets between the muon stations and inner tracker are : using a simple minimal distance criterion between @xmath17 , @xmath18 and p@xmath1 of independent track measurements at the impact point one can obtain a high matching efficiency with a contamination of not more than 4% for p@xmath12 of 50 gev and 6% for 100 gev . for the more collimated jets with p@xmath12 = 200 gev ,
the impurity in matching is at a @xmath29 7% level .
the matching efficiency shows less variation when a constrained fit at the impact point is performed with @xmath28 = 500 @xmath20 . to further improve the matching efficiency and impurity a more sophisticated software than currently available
must be used , for example a constrain fir to the secondary @xmath0 jets vertices obtained from the inner tracker can be performed . | identification measurement of muons in inner tracker high spatial resolution excellent momentum measurement in 4 t field important demanding particularly for muons in jets muon system occupancy low pattern recognition easy particle reaches muon system barrel p@xmath4 4 gev for non - isolated muons difficulty match track in muon stations with correct candidate inner tracker high track density inside jet situations arise in muon tagging @xmath5-jets @xmath5 @xmath2 @xmath7 cascades @xmath5 @xmath8 physics susy(@xmath9 ) physics high e@xmath1 scale jets heavy flavour @xmath5 @xmath11 qcd jets muon bundles within jets matching strategy based on full parameter space reconstructed momentum position plane for two tracks muon system inner tracker quantities monitored efficiency of matching muon matching impurity generation of ghost fake tracks results obtained using detailed description of complete cms detector tdr design simulations effects 4 t field includedperformed simulation response @xmath0 jets momenta p@xmath12 50 100 200 gev p@xmath1 range @xmath5-jets @xmath13 production one muon each jet p@xmath14 @xmath15 5 gev rapidity region -1.1 @xmath16 1.1 . 1000 events generated reconstructed barrel part each energy point results obtained standard cms reconstruction procedure data card muon 2 trak 3 cmsim version 115 pattern recognition muon stations building track segments reconstructed hits r,@xmath18 z ) planes track segments same muon station sectors pair kalman filter starting outermost stations inner stations constrained fit impact point default values @xmath19 = 15 @xmath20 @xmath21 = 5.3 cm decay mean transverse length @xmath5-quarks 500 @xmath20 reconstruction constrained fit impact point @xmath19 = 500 @xmath20 = 5.3 cm global track finder gtf ) used pattern recognition cms inner tracker algorithm large number hits per event 5.10@xmath22 hits low ten more high luminosity road preselection first stage algorithm second stage kalman filter final hit selection track fittingtwo track segments muon system inner tracker extrapolate to common plane check difference momentum position select best combination correct combination known from simulation possible to calculate efficiency matching matching criterion minimal distance from @xmath17 @xmath18 p@xmath23 two track candidates at outer plane inner tracker impact point association of reconstructed tracks to geant ones on hit basis associated to geant particle number if more than half hits from geant track no dominating track `` ghost '' more than one track matched to geant number `` fake '' @xmath17 dependence reconstruction efficiency for barrel muon station fig 1a uniform except region between central rings ( @xmath24 @xmath16 0.2 @xmath24 @xmath15 0.9 avoid influence tracks with @xmath24 @xmath15 0.9 removed p@xmath1 reconstruction efficiency more than 95% for tracks with p@xmath14 @xmath15 10 gev fig . 1c ) type of reconstructed tracks in muon stations best candidate between tracks tracker comparison between reconstructed generated variables p@xmath1 @xmath17 @xmath18 in fig . 1d -barrel muon stations inner tracker p@xmath12 = 100 gev p@xmath1 muon resolution 10% muon stations @xmath16 1% inner tracker values muon tracker tdrs@xmath25 matching quality @xmath26 formed differences reconstructed @xmath17 @xmath18 p@xmath1 detectors track combinations outer tracker plane impact point @xmath27 @xmath26 contribution p@xmath23 muon stations tracker improves selection matching tracks high transverse momenta minimal @xmath26 matching tracks matching criterion p@xmath1 dependence matching efficiency shown fig . 2 p@xmath12 = 50 100 200 gev outer plane inner tracker interaction point constrained fit impact point @xmath28 = 15 = 500 @xmath20 degradation matching efficiency higher p@xmath12 due charged particle multiplicity jets difficult association tracks muon stations inner tracker matching efficiency less variation constrained fit impact point @xmath28 = 500 @xmath20 results matching muons @xmath0 jets p@xmath12 50 100 200 gev summarized table 1 matched tracks higher purity impact point lower jet momentahigher multiplicity more collimated jets at p@xmath12 = 200 gev impurity matching degrades to @xmath29 7% rejecting tracks increasing momentum threshold @xmath16 p@xmath30 high matching efficiency purity for high p@xmath12 reduction in statistics ghost '' tracks at reconstruction stations negligible fake '' tracks with jets momenta 1% - 2% after matching procedure assign tracks muon station precise measurements from tracker distributions differences between reconstructed generated values p@xmath1 @xmath17 @xmath18 at impact point matched tracks at p@xmath12 = 100 gev in fig . 3 distributions same as fig 2 reconstructed generated variables good quality matching criterion bottom row type of tracks reconstructed muon stations matched tracks at impact point quality track matching measured by value `` pull '' : @xmath31 z@xmath32 track charge tracker reconstructed momentum cov(1/p.1/p ) covariance matrix gaussian fit to pull gives @xmath34 @xmath29 1.0 good accuracy for selection matching tracksresults matching muon tracks @xmath0 jets between stations inner tracker minimal distance criterion between @xmath17 @xmath18 p@xmath1 high matching efficiency contamination 4% for p@xmath12 50 gev 6% 100 gev collimated jets with p@xmath12 = 200 gev impurity matching @xmath29 7% level matching efficiency less variation constrained fit with @xmath28 = 500 @xmath20 improve matching efficiency impurity sophisticated software constrain fir secondary @xmath0 jets vertices inner tracker | 0.353282 | 2,379 | 1,263 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,766 | we perform the first study for the bound states of colored scalar particles @xmath0 ( `` scalar quarks '' ) in terms of mass generation with quenched su(3)@xmath1 lattice qcd .
we investigate the bound states of @xmath0 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 ( scalar - quark hadrons " ) , as well as the bound states of @xmath0 and quarks @xmath4 , i.e. , @xmath5 , @xmath6 and @xmath7 ( chimera hadrons " ) .
all these new - type hadrons including @xmath0 have a large mass of several gev due to large quantum corrections by gluons , even for zero bare scalar - quark mass @xmath8 at @xmath9 .
we find a similar @xmath10-dependence between @xmath5 and @xmath7 , which indicates their similar structure due to the large mass of @xmath0 . from this study
, we conjecture that all colored particles generally acquire a large effective mass due to dressed gluons . | the origin of mass is one of the fundamental and fascinating subjects in physics .
about 99% of mass of matter in the world originates from the strong interaction , which provides the large constituent quark mass @xmath11 .
such a dynamical fermion - mass generation in the strong interaction can be interpreted as spontaneous chiral - symmetry breaking ( @xmath12sb).@xcite in the strong interaction , however , there is other type of dynamical mass generation than @xmath12sb .
for instance , gluons , which are massless in perturbation qcd , seem to have a large effective mass as @xmath13,@xcite due to non - perturbative effects .
actually , glueballs , which are ideally composed only by gluons , have a large mass , e.g. , about @xmath14.@xcite the same holds for charm quarks .
whereas the current mass of charm quarks is about 1.2gev at the renormalization point @xmath15 = 1gev , the constituent charm - quark mass in the quark model is set to be about 1.6gev .
the about 400mev difference between the current and the constituent charm - quark masses could be explained by dynamical mass generation without @xmath12sb , since there is no chiral symmetry for such heavy quarks .
these examples imply mass generation without @xmath12sb in the strong interaction .
we therefore conjecture that large dynamical mass generation generally occurs even without @xmath12sb in the strong - interaction world , i.e. , _ all colored particles have a large effective mass generated by dressed gluon effects._@xcite in this study , we investigate the system of colored scalar particles , which do not have chiral symmetry .
we consider light 3c - colored scalar - quarks " @xmath0 .
the light scalar - quarks can be also regarded as idealized point - like `` diquarks '' at the scale of @xmath16gev .
we investigate `` scalar - quark mesons '' @xmath17 and `` scalar - quark baryons '' @xmath3 as the bound states of scalar quarks @xmath0 .
we also investigate the bound states of scalar - quarks @xmath0 and quarks @xmath4 , i.e. , @xmath18 , @xmath6 and @xmath7 , which we name `` chimera hadrons''.@xcite to include scalar - quarks @xmath0 together with quarks @xmath4 and gluons in qcd , we adopt the generalized qcd lagrangian density,@xcite @xmath19 where @xmath20 denotes the quark part and @xmath21 the bare mass of scalar - quarks @xmath0 . in the actual calculation
, we use a discretized euclidean action on the @xmath22 lattice at @xmath23=5.7,@xcite i.e. , lattice spacing @xmath241.1gev.@xcite the parameters employed in the analysis are summarized in table 1 .
the gauge - invariant local operators @xmath25 of scalar - quark hadrons and chimera hadrons are summarized in table 2 .
we introduce scalar - quark flavor " denoted by @xmath26 and investigate the scalar - quark flavor non - singlet mesons , which do not have disconnected diagrams in their correlators .
note that , without the `` scalar - quark flavor '' degrees of freedom , the baryonic local operators of @xmath3 and @xmath7 inevitably vanish due to the anti - symmetric tensor @xmath27 .
we calculate the temporal correlator @xmath28 , where the total momentum is projected to be zero .
the mass @xmath29 of these hadrons are obtained as @xmath30 for large @xmath31 . here
, we show the lattice results for the masses of new - type hadrons .
figure 1 shows the squared scalar - quark - meson mass @xmath32 and the squared scalar - quark - baryon mass squared @xmath33 , plotted against the bare scalar - quark mass squared @xmath34 at @xmath35 . even for zero bare scalar - quark mass ,
scalar - quark hadrons have a large mass as @xmath36 and @xmath37 .
we find the `` constituent scalar - quark picture '' , i.e. , @xmath38 and @xmath39 , where @xmath40gev is the constituent scalar - quark mass .
the calculation can be performed even in the region @xmath41 due to large quantum corrections on @xmath0 .
we also find the relations , @xmath42 and @xmath43 from the figure . together with the `` constituent scalar - quark picture '' , we reach the relation @xmath44 , where @xmath45 is the self - energy of @xmath0 and is expected to be insensitive to @xmath21 .
this is a natural relation between the renormalized mass and the bare mass for scalar particles . and
( b ) `` scalar - quark baryon '' mass squared @xmath33 plotted against the bare scalar - quark mass squared @xmath34 at @xmath35.,width=377 ] around the heavy scalar - quarks in the chimera hadrons .
similar to chimera mesons , the wave - function of @xmath4 in chimera baryons distributes around the two @xmath0 s localized near the center of mass .
, width=230 ] chimera hadrons also have a large mass even at @xmath46 , i.e. , @xmath47gev for chimera mesons @xmath5 , and @xmath48gev , @xmath49gev for chimera baryons ( @xmath50 ) .
we find a `` constituent scalar - quark / quark picture '' , i.e. , an approximate relation as @xmath51 with the constituent quark mass @xmath52 , and the large constituent scalar - quark mass @xmath53.@xcite from the @xmath10-dependence of chimera hadron masses , we conjecture a similar structure between chimera mesons @xmath5 and chimera baryons @xmath7.@xcite the wave - function of @xmath4 in a chimera meson @xmath5 is distributed around the heavy scalar - quark @xmath54 due to the large mass of @xmath0 , and , similarly , the wave - function of @xmath4 in a chimera baryon @xmath7 is distributed around the point - like di - scalar - quark " @xmath55 .
( see fig .
[ fig2 ] . )
we have performed the first study of light scalar - quarks " @xmath0 ( colored scalar particles or idealized diquarks ) and their color - singlet hadronic states in quenched su(3)@xmath1 lattice qcd in terms of dynamical mass generation .
we have investigated the mass of `` scalar - quark mesons '' @xmath17 , `` scalar - quark baryons '' @xmath3 and `` chimera hadrons '' ( @xmath18 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 ) , which are composed of quarks @xmath4 and scalar - quarks @xmath0 .
we have observed the large dynamical mass generation of scalar - quarks @xmath0 about 1.5gev at @xmath56 due to large quantum corrections by gluons , even at the zero bare scalar - quark mass @xmath8 .
this lattice result also indicates that plausible diquarks used in effective hadron models can not be described as the point - like particles and should have a much larger size than @xmath57fm.@xcite this study indicates that , even without @xmath12sb , large dynamical mass generation in the strong interaction occurs for the scalar - quark systems .
together with the large glueball mass and the large difference between the current and the constituent charm - quark masses , this type of mass generation would generally occur in the strong interaction , and therefore we conjecture that all colored particles generally acquire a large effective mass due to dressed gluon effects,@xcite as shown in fig . 3 . | origin of mass fundamental 99% mass originates from strong interaction large quark mass @xmath11 dynamical fermion - mass generation spontaneous chiral - symmetry breaking @xmath12sb). other dynamical mass generation than @xmath12sb gluons massless in perturbation qcd large mass due to non - perturbative effects glueballs gluons have large mass @xmath14. charm quarks current mass 1.2gev at renormalization point @xmath15 = 1gev constituent charm - quark mass 1.6gev 400mev difference between current charm - quark masses by dynamical mass generation without @xmath12sb no chiral symmetry for heavy quarks examples imply mass generation without @xmath12sb strong interaction conjecture large dynamical mass generation occurs without @xmath12sb strong all colored particles have large effective mass dressed gluon effects investigate system colored scalar particles chiral symmetry consider light 3c - colored scalar - quarks @xmath0 idealized point - like diquarks at scale @xmath16gev investigate scalar - quark mesons @xmath17 baryons @xmath3 bound states scalar quarks @xmath0 scalar quarks @xmath4 chimera hadrons'' include scalar - quarks @xmath4 gluons qcd adopt generalized qcd lagrangian density @xmath20 quark part bare mass scalar - quarks discretized euclidean action @xmath22 lattice @xmath23=5.7 lattice spacing @xmath241.1gev parameters summarized table 1 gauge - invariant local operators scalar - quark hadrons chimera hadrons summarized table 2 introduce scalar - quark flavor @xmath26 investigate non - singlet mesons disconnected diagrams without scalar - quark flavor degrees freedom baryonic local operators @xmath3 @xmath7 vanish anti - symmetric tensor @xmath27 calculate temporal correlator @xmath28 total momentum projected zero mass @xmath29 hadrons obtained @xmath30 large @xmath31 lattice results masses new - type hadronsfigure 1 shows squared scalar - quark - meson mass @xmath32 baryon mass @xmath33 against bare scalar - quark mass zero scalar - quark mass hadrons large mass @xmath36 constituent scalar - quark picture @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40gev constituent scalar - quark mass calculation region @xmath41 quantum corrections @xmath0 relations @xmath42 @xmath43 relation @xmath44 @xmath45 self - energy of @xmath0 insensitive to @xmath21 natural relation between renormalized mass bare mass for scalar particles scalar - quark baryon mass @xmath33 against bare scalar - quark mass @xmath34 @xmath35 heavy scalar - quarks in chimera hadrons wave - function of @xmath4 in chimera baryons distributes around @xmath0 s center mass chimera hadrons have large mass at @xmath46 @xmath47gev for mesons @xmath48gev for baryons constituent scalar - quark picture ''relation @xmath51 quark mass @xmath52 large scalar - quark mass @xmath53 @xmath10-dependence chimera hadron masses similar structure chimera mesons @xmath5 baryons @xmath7 wave - function @xmath4 meson distributed heavy scalar - quark @xmath54 large mass @xmath0 @xmath4 baryon point - like di - scalar - quark @xmath55 first study light scalar - quarks @xmath0 colored scalar particles color - singlet hadronic states@xmath1 lattice qcd dynamical mass generation investigated mass scalar - quark mesons @xmath17 baryons @xmath3 chimera hadrons @xmath18 @xmath7 quarks @xmath4 scalar - quarks @xmath0 observed large dynamical mass generation scalar - quarks @xmath0 1.5gev @xmath56 quantum corrections gluons zero scalar - quark mass @xmath8 diquarks hadron models point - like particles larger size @xmath57fm without @xmath12sb large dynamical mass generation strong interaction scalar - quark systemslarge glueball mass difference between current charm - quark masses mass generation strong interaction conjecture colored particles acquire large mass due to dressed gluon effects fig . 3 | 0.305577 | 1,798 | 943 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,767 | we investigate the scalar meson mass dependence on the chiral phase transition in the framework of an su(3 ) , ( axial)vector meson extended linear sigma model with additional constituent quarks and polyakov loops .
we determine the parameters of the lagrangian at zero temperature in a hybrid approach , where we treat the mesons at tree - level , while the constituent quarks at 1-loop level .
we assume two nonzero scalar condensates and together with the polyakov - loop variables we determine their temperature dependence according to the 1-loop level field equations . | the investigation of the qcd phase diagram is a very important subject both theoretically and experimentally nowadays . the ongoing and future heavy ion experiments such as rhic , and cern / lhc study the low density part of the phase diagram which can also be investigated theoretically by lattice qcd , at cbm / fair the high density part will be studied , which is still not settled theoretically , so it is worth to investigate the phase diagram thoroughly . our starting point is the ( axial)vector meson extended linear sigma model with additional constituent quarks and polyakov - loop variables .
the previous version of the model , without constituent quarks and polyakov - loops , was exhaustively analyzed at zero temperature in @xcite term ) .
this , however , does not influence the results much . ] .
the lagrangian of the model is given by , @xmath0-m_{0 } ^{2}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(\phi^{\dagger}\phi)-\lambda_{1}[{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(\phi^{\dagger } \phi)]^{2}-\lambda_{2}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(\phi^{\dagger}\phi)^{2}\nonumber \\ & -\frac{1}{4}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(l_{\mu\nu}^{2}+r_{\mu\nu}^{2})+{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\left [ \left ( \frac{m_{1}^{2}}{2}+\delta\right ) ( l_{\mu}^{2}+r_{\mu}^{2})\right ] + { \mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}[h(\phi+\phi^{\dagger})]\nonumber \\ & + c_{1}(\det\phi+\det\phi^{\dagger})+i\frac{g_{2}}{2}({\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\{l_{\mu\nu}[l^{\mu},l^{\nu}]\}+{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\{r_{\mu\nu}[r^{\mu},r^{\nu } ] \})\nonumber \\ & + \frac{h_{1}}{2}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(\phi^{\dagger}\phi){\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(l_{\mu } ^{2}+r_{\mu}^{2})+h_{2}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}[(l_{\mu}\phi)^{2}+(\phi r_{\mu } ) ^{2}]+2h_{3}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(l_{\mu}\phi r^{\mu}\phi^{\dagger})\\ & + g_{3}[{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(l_{\mu}l_{\nu}l^{\mu}l^{\nu})+{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(r_{\mu}r_{\nu } r^{\mu}r^{\nu } ) ] + g_{4}[{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\left ( l_{\mu}l^{\mu}l_{\nu}l^{\nu } \right ) \nonumber\\ & + { \mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\left ( r_{\mu}r^{\mu}r_{\nu}r^{\nu}\right ) ] + g_{5}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\left ( l_{\mu}l^{\mu}\right ) \,{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\left ( r_{\nu}r^{\nu}\right ) + g_{6 } [ { \mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(l_{\mu}l^{\mu})\,{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(l_{\nu}l^{\nu})\nonumber \\ & + { \mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(r_{\mu}r^{\mu})\,{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}(r_{\nu}r^{\nu } ) ] + \bar{\psi}i { \mbox{$\,\slash$ \hspace{-0.9em}$\partial$}}\psi - g_{f}\bar{\psi}\left(\phi_{s } + i\gamma_5\phi_{ps}\right)\psi,\nonumber \ ] ] where @xmath1 , \nonumber\\ l^{\mu\nu } & = \partial^{\mu}l^{\nu}-iea_{e}^{\mu}[t_{3},l^{\nu } ] - \left\{\partial^{\nu}l^{\mu } - iea_{e}^{\nu}[t_{3},l^{\mu}]\right\ } , \nonumber \\ r^{\mu\nu } & = \partial^{\mu}r^{\nu } - iea_{e}^{\mu}[t_{3},r^{\nu } ] - \left\ { \partial^{\nu}r^{\mu}-iea_{e}^{\nu}[t_{3},r^{\mu}]\right\ } .
\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath2 stands for the scalar and pseudoscalar fields , @xmath3 and @xmath4 for the left and right handed vector fields , @xmath5 for the constituent quark fields , while @xmath6 for the external field .
in order to go to finite temperature / chemical potential , parameters of the lagrangian have to be determined , which is done at @xmath7 . for this
we calculate tree - level masses and decay widths of the model and compare them with the experimental data taken from the pdg @xcite . for the comparison we use a @xmath8 minimalization method @xcite to fit our parameters ( for more details see @xcite ) .
it is important to note that in the present work we also included in the scalar and pseudoscalar masses the contributions coming from the fermion vacuum fluctuations by adapting the method of @xcite .
we have @xmath9 unknown parameters , namely @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 , @xmath22 , and @xmath23 . here
@xmath23 is the coupling of the additionally introduced yukawa term , which can be determined from the constituent quark masses through the equations @xmath24 , @xmath25 .
it is worth to note that if we do not consider the very uncertain scalar - isoscalar sector @xmath10 , and @xmath11 always appear in the same combination @xmath26 in all the expressions , thus we can not determine them separately .
additionally a similar combination appears for @xmath14 and @xmath17 in the vector sector as @xmath27 ( see details in @xcite ) .
the parameter values of the fit without scalars are given in table [ tab - param ] .
.parameters determined by @xmath8 minimalization [ cols="<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] since @xmath11 and @xmath28 are undetermined they can be tuned to select the @xmath29 ( a.k.a .
@xmath30 ) from the scalar spectrum ( by its mass and decay widths ) and its mass has , as we will see , a huge effect on the thermal properties of the model .
in our approach we have four order parameters , which are the @xmath31 non - strange and @xmath32 strange condensates , and the @xmath2 and @xmath33 polyakov - loop variables .
the condensates arise due to the spontaneous symmetry breaking and @xmath34 , while the polyakov - loop variables naturally emerge in mean field approximation , if one calculates free fermion grand canonical potential on a constant gluon background .
the effect of fermions propagating on a constant gluon background in the temporal direction formally amounts to the appearance of imaginary color dependent chemical potentials ( for details see @xcite ) . at finite temperature / baryochemical potential
we can set up four coupled field equations for the four fields , which are just the requirements that the first derivatives of the grand canonical potential according to the fields must vanish .
as a first approximation we apply a hybrid approach in which we only consider vacuum and thermal fluctuations for the fermions , but not for the bosons .
we use a mean field polyakov - loop potential @xmath35 of a polynomial form with coefficients determined in @xcite . within this simplified treatment
the equations are the following : @xmath36 where @xmath37 and @xmath38 with the modified distribution functions @xmath39
solving eqs . [ eq_phi]-[eq_phis ] we get the temperature dependence of the order parameters , which can be seen in fig . [ fig - fields_high_sigma ] .
gev , scaledwidth=110.0% ] gev , scaledwidth=110.0% ] in @xcite it was shown that the @xmath40 scalar nonet most probably contains @xmath41 s with masses higher than @xmath42 gev .
if we set @xmath43 we get @xmath44 gev , which is in agreement with @xcite .
however in this case we get a very high pseudocritical temperature , @xmath45 mev , for @xmath31 , which is much larger than earlier results ( e.g. on lattice @xmath46 mev @xcite ) . now , if we tune @xmath11 to get @xmath47 mev ( which corresponds to the physical particle @xmath48 ) , than @xmath49 goes down to @xmath50 mev , which can be seen in fig .
[ fig - fields_low_sigma ] .
this finding is in line with the results of @xcite , where they used a similar model , but without vector mesons .
this suggests that in order to get a good pseudocritical temperature we would need a scalar - isoscalar particle with low mass ( @xmath51 mev ) , which is probably not a @xmath40 state according to @xcite .
gev , scaledwidth=110.0% ] gev , scaledwidth=110.0% ] in fig .
[ fig - mass_high_sigma ] and [ fig - mass_low_sigma ] we show the temperature dependence of the scalar meson masses .
the mass of the parity partners ( @xmath52 and @xmath29 ) reaches the same value above the phase transition temperature .
authors were supported by the hungarian otka fund k109462 and by the hic for fair guest funds of the goethe university frankfurt .
d. parganlija , p. kovcs , gy .
wolf , f. giacosa and d. h. rischke , phys .
d * 87 * , 014011 ( 2013 ) .
p. kovcs and gy .
wolf , acta phys.polon.supp . 6
( 2013 ) 3 , 853 - 858 p. kovcs , a. lukcs , j. vrczy , gy
. wolf and m. ztnyi , phys.rev .
d89 ( 2014 ) 054004 s. chatterjee and k. a. mohan , phys .
d * 85 * , 074018 ( 2012 ) . c. p.
korthals altes , r. d. pisarski and a. sinkovics , phys .
d * 61 * , 056007 ( 2000 ) .
g. mark and zs .
szp , phys . rev .
d * 82 * , 065021 ( 2010 ) . c. ratti , m. a. thaler and w. weise , phys .
d * 73 * ( 2006 ) 014019 .
y. aoki _ et al .
_ , phys . lett .
b * 643 * , 46 ( 2006 ) . | investigation qcd phase diagram important theoretically experimentally future heavy ion experiments rhic cern / lhc study low density part investigated lattice qcd cbm fair high density part studied not settled theoretically worth investigate phase diagram thoroughly starting point axial)vector meson extended linear sigma model additional constituent quarks polyakov - loop variables previous version without quarks polyakov - loops analyzed at zero temperature @xcite influence resultslagrangian model @xmath0{2}\mathop\mathrm{tr\dagger\lambda{1}{2}-\lambda{2}\mathop\mathrm\dagger{2}\nonumber\frac{1}{4}\mathop\mathrm{tr\mu\nu}{2}+r{{2}+\mathop\mathrm{tr\left\frac{m_{1}{2}}{2}+\delta\right{\mu}{2}+r_{\mu}{2})\right\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\phi+\phi\dagger}\nonumber{1}\phi\dagger}\frac{g_{2}}{2}\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}{\mu\nu}{}\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}{\mu\nu}\nonumber\frac{h_{1}}{2}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\phi\dagger}{tr{{2}+r_{\mu}{2})+h_{2}{\mathop{tr{\mu}\phi{2}+{{3}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr{\dagger}{3}\mathop{\mathrm{tr{\mu}l{\nu}l{}l{\nu}\mathop{\mathrm{tr{\mu}r{{ g{4}\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\left{\mu}l{}l{\nu}l{\nu\nonumber\\\mathop{\mathrm{tr\left{\mu}r{\nu}r{\nu}\right{5}{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\left{\mu}l{\mu}\right{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}}\left{\nu}r{\nu}\right g_{6\mathop{\mathrm{tr(l{\mu}l{\mu}{{tr{\nu}l{\nu}\nonumber \mathop{\mathrm{tr(r{\mu}r{\mu}{\mathrm{tr{\nu}r{\nu{\psi \mbox{$\slash{-0.9em}$\partial$}}psi - g_{f}\bar{\psi}\left\phi{s + i\gamma_5\phi_{ps}\right\psi\nonumber @xmath1 \nonumber\\ l^{\mu\nu\partial^{\mu}l{\nu{\mu}{3}\left\partial^{\nu}l{\mu{e{\nu}{3},l{\mu}\right\nonumber r^{\mu\nu } \partial^{\mu}r^{\nu }{\mu}[t_{3},r{\nu\left\partial^{\nu}r{\mu}-iea^{\nu}[t_{3},r^{\mu}\right \nonumber\end{aligned} @xmath2 scalar pseudoscalar fields @xmath3 @xmath4 left right vector fields @xmath5 constituent quark fields @xmath6 external field finite temperature chemical potential parameters lagrangian determined @xmath7 calculate tree - level masses decay widths compare experimental data @xcite @xmath8 minimalization methodimportant present work included scalar pseudoscalar masses contributions from fermion vacuum fluctuations adapting method @xcite @xmath9 unknown parameters @xmath10 @xmath23 coupling of introduced yukawa term determined from constituent quark masses through equations @xmath24 @xmath25 uncertain scalar - isoscalar sector @xmath10 @xmath11 appear in same combination @xmath26 expressions can not determine separately similar combination for @xmath14 @xmath17 in vector sector as @xmath27 see details in @xcite ) parameter values of fit without scalars given in table [ tab - param ].parameters determined by @xmath8 minimalization @xmath11 @xmath28 undetermined can tuned to select @xmath29 @xmath30 ) from scalar spectrum by mass decay widths mass on thermal properties model approach four order parameters @xmath31 non - strange @xmath32 strange condensates @xmath2 @xmath33 polyakov - loop variablescondensates arise symmetry breaking @xmath34 polyakov - loop variables emerge in mean field approximation fermion canonical potential on constant gluon background fermions propagating on constant gluon background imaginary color dependent chemical potentials see @xcite finite temperature baryochemical potential four coupled field equations for fields first derivatives of grand canonical potential vanish hybrid approach consider vacuum thermal fluctuations for fermions not bosons use mean field polyakov - loop potential @xmath35 polynomial form coefficients determined in @xcite equations @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 modified distribution functions @xmath39 solving_phi-_phis temperature dependence of order parameters in fig . scaledwidth=110 @xmath40 scalar nonet contains @xmath41 s masses higher than @xmath42 gev set @xmath43 get @xmath44 gev agreement with @xcite high pseudocritical temperature @xmath45 mev for @xmath31 larger than earlier results lattice @xmath46 mev @xcitetune @xmath11 @xmath47 mev corresponds physical particle @xmath48 @xmath49 to @xmath50 mev fig . fields_low_sigma finding with results @xcite similar model without vector mesons suggests good pseudocritical temperature scalar - isoscalar particle low mass @xmath51 mev not @xmath40 state @xcite fig mass_high_sigma_low_sigma temperature dependence scalar meson masses mass parity partners @xmath52 @xmath29 ) same value above phase transition temperature authors supported by hungarian otka fund k109462 hic fair guest funds goethe university frankfurt parganlija kovcs wolf giacosa rischke phys . d * 87 *, 014011 ( 2013 ) acta phys.polon.supp . 6 ( 2013 ) 3 , 853 - 858 ztnyi phys.rev . d89 ( 2014 ) 054004 chatterjee mohan phys . d * 85 *, 074018 ( 2012 ) korthals pisarski sinkovics phys . d * 61 *, 056007 ( 2000 )mark zs szp . rev. d 82 065021 2010 ) ratti thaler weise phys . 73 * 2006 ) 014019 aoki al. . 643 * 46 ( 2006 ) | 0.485884 | 2,697 | 1,421 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,774 | the main purpose of this paper is to demonstrate and illustrate , once again , the potency of the variational technique as an approximation procedure for the quantization of quantum mechanical systems . by choosing particle - in - a - box wavefunctions as trial wavefunctions , with the size of the box as the variation parameter , approximate eigenenergies and the corresponding eigenfunctions are obtained for the one dimensional free harmonic oscillator . | this paper was inspired by the 1965 work of padnos , as reported in reference @xcite . using the variation ansatz with normalized wavefunctions of a particle in a box as trial wavefunctions , he obtained approximate values for the ground state energy and the first excited state energy of the one dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator .
padnos work was preceded by and is an improvement upon the work of rich @xcite , who approximated the oscillator by a particle in a one dimensional box whose size was the classical range of the oscillator .
one of the reasons padnos was discouraged from extending the calculations to higher energy levels was the belief that the calculation becomes more tedious as one must introduce extra terms to orthogonalize the new function to the ones already found ( for example , the second excited state must be chosen to be orthogonal to both the ground state and the first excited state ) .
the authors of this present paper have no need to introduce any extra terms since the eigenstates of the particle in a box can all be chosen to be mutually orthogonal , as simple trigonometric functions ( see section [ sec.pf1lpk4 ] ) . another notable paper which employed the variational method for harmonic oscillator quantization is reference @xcite , where different sets of basis functions , built from non - orthogonal monomials , were used as trial wavefunctions .
a particle of mass @xmath0 , free to move _ only _ in a ` box ' of size @xmath1 , so that the potential , @xmath2 , is @xmath3 is decribed by the hamiltonian @xmath4 the eigenfunctions of @xmath5 are non - degenerate and are given by @xmath6 } , & r=0,2,4,\ldots\\ \\
\sqrt{\frac 1l}\sin{\left[\frac{(r+1)\pi x}{2l}\right ] } , & r=1,3,5,\ldots\ , , \end{cases}\ ] ] with corresponding eigenvalues @xmath7 where @xmath8 .
the eigenfunctions @xmath9 can be written more compactly as @xmath10,\quad r=0,1,2,3,\ldots\ ] ] if the particle is not free in the box but is instead under the influence of a potential , @xmath2 , where @xmath11 then the system becomes a ` confined ' quantum harmonic oscillator ( cho ) , and is now described by the hamiltonian @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the classical frequency of the oscillator . although the confined quantum harmonic oscillator has been studied for a long time ( see references @xcite and the references therein ) , it does not seem to enjoy the same popularity as its @xmath14 limit , the ` free ' quantum harmonic oscillator ( fho ) , with @xmath15 it is our aim in this paper to apply the variation procedure to quantize @xmath16 through @xmath17 .
since @xmath5 and @xmath17 live in the same hilbert space we will use the complete set of functions @xmath9 ( eigenstates of @xmath5 ) as trial wavefunctions in the variation ansatz .
the size of the box , @xmath18 , then enters , naturally , as the variation parameter .
the functions @xmath9 as given in , being non - degenerate eigenstates of a hermitian operator , @xmath5 , are a complete set of vectors spanning an infinite dimensional hilbert space .
in particular @xmath9 being mutually orthogonal in the interval and satisfying the boundary conditions are a suitable choice of trial wavefunctions for the confined harmonic oscillator hamiltonian , @xmath17 , whose eigenfunctions are also required to satisfy the same boundary conditions . the box size , @xmath18
, then serves as the variation parameter which will be optimized to get the approximate eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the free harmonic oscillator .
henceforth , any quantity derived for the free harmonic oscillator by optimization will be indicated with an asterik on its symbol .
the optimized box size , @xmath19 , is obtained by solving @xmath20 for @xmath19 , where @xmath21 the optimized approximate energy eigenvalues of the free harmonic oscillator are then given by @xmath22 actually , the @xmath23 introduced in ( ground state energy of the free particle in a box ) is more convenient to use as the variation parameter , with its optimum value @xmath24 being related to the optimum value of the box size @xmath19 by @xmath25 @xmath24 is obtained by expressing the @xmath26 of in terms of @xmath23 and then solving @xmath27 for @xmath24 .
the optimized approximate eigenenergies of the free harmonic oscillator are then obtained from @xmath28 performing the integration in we have @xmath29 where @xmath30 .
thus @xmath31 where @xmath32 from and we have @xmath33 so that @xmath34 from and we have @xmath35 so that the approximate eigenenergies of the free harmonic oscillator , @xmath36 , are given by @xmath37 writing as @xmath38 where @xmath39 , and using we have @xmath40 so that the approximate eigenstates of the free harmonic oscillator are given by @xmath41,\quad r=0,1,2,3,\ldots}\ ] ] the optimized eigenfunctions @xmath42 are expected to approximate the eigenstates of the free harmonic oscillator in the interval : .
the free harmonic oscillator is one of the few quantum mechanical systems that can be quantized exactly .
expressions for the eigenenergies and the corresponding wavefunctions are derived in every book on quantum mechanics . for quantum numbers @xmath43 ,
the energy eigenvalues are given by @xmath44 with corresponding normalized wavefunctions @xmath45 where @xmath46 is the degree @xmath47 hermite polynomial in @xmath48 and , as before , and .
the first few hermite polynomials are : @xmath49 we recall expressions and for the approximate and exact eigenenergies of the free one - dimensional linear harmonic oscillator : @xmath50 @xmath51 and @xmath52 are plotted in figure [ fig.zsxuwpe ] as functions of the harmonic oscillator quantum number @xmath53 .
the agreement between @xmath36 and @xmath26 is quite remarkable , especially for low quantum numbers . , with the exact eigenenergies , @xmath26 , for the free harmonic oscillator .
] to illustrate the agreement between the variation results and the exact wavefunctions for the free harmonic oscillator , it is instructive to plot the approximate and the exact wavefunctions together , as functions of position .
here we do this for the ground state and the first excited state . from and
we have @xmath54 and @xmath55 the good correlation between @xmath56 and @xmath57 is already obvious from the taylor series expansion of both functions : @xmath58 and @xmath59 with @xmath60 the approximate ground state wavefunction @xmath61 and the exact ground state wavefunction @xmath62 of the free harmonic oscillator , with @xmath63 are shown in figure [ fig.q96gfpe ] as functions of position . , and exact ground state , @xmath62 as functions of position , for the free harmonic oscillator , for @xmath63 . ] as for the first excited state , we have from and we have @xmath64 and @xmath65 and exact first excited state , @xmath66 , as functions of position , for the free harmonic oscillator , for @xmath63 . ] the variation of @xmath67 and @xmath68 with respect to position are as shown in figure [ fig.wipsqc4 ] .
by using the normalized mutually orthogonal wavefunctions of the free - particle - in - a - box model as trial wavefunctions in variation calculation we have obtained approximate energy eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenstates for the one dimensional free harmonic oscillator of mass @xmath0 and classical frequency @xmath13 .
we obtained , for quantum numbers @xmath69 , @xmath70 and @xmath71\,,\ ] ] where @xmath72 and @xmath73 with @xmath39 . | paper inspired by 1965 work padnos @xcite using variation ansatz normalized wavefunctions particle in box obtained values for ground state energy first excited state energy of one dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator padnos work improvement @xcite approximated oscillator by particle in one dimensional box classical range padnos discouraged from extending calculations to higher energy levels calculation tedious extra terms function second excited state orthogonal to ground first state authors paper no need to introduce extra terms eigenstates particle in box can be chosen mutually orthogonal simple trigonometric functions see section sec.pf1lpk4 ] paper variational method for harmonic oscillator quantization @xcite basis functions from non - orthogonal monomials used as trial wavefunctionsparticle mass @xmath0 free to move in box size @xmath1 potential @xmath2 @xmath3 decribed by hamiltonian @xmath4 eigenfunctions @xmath5 non - degenerate given by @xmath6 r=0,2,4,\ldots\\ r=1,3,5,\ldots corresponding eigenvalues @xmath7 @xmath8 eigenfunctions @xmath9 written as @xmath10 r=0,1,2,3,\ldots if particle not free box under influence of potential @xmath2 @xmath11 system becomes confined quantum harmonic oscillator described by hamiltonian @xmath12 @xmath13 classical frequency oscillator confined quantum harmonic oscillator studied long popularity as @xmath14 limit free quantum harmonic oscillator aim to apply variation procedure to quantize @xmath16 through @xmath17 @xmath5 and @xmath17 same hilbert space use complete functions @xmath9 eigenstates @xmath5 as trial wavefunctions in variation ansatz size box @xmath18 enters as variation parameterfunctions @xmath9 non - degenerate eigenstates of hermitian operator @xmath5 vectors spanning infinite dimensional hilbert space @xmath9 orthogonal satisfying boundary conditions suitable trial wavefunctions for confined harmonic oscillator hamiltonian @xmath17 eigenfunctions boundary conditions box size @xmath18 variation parameter optimized approximate eigenfunctions eigenvalues free harmonic oscillator quantity derived by optimization indicated with asterik optimized box size @xmath19 obtained solving @xmath20 for @xmath19 @xmath21 optimized energy eigenvalues by @xmath22 @xmath23 ground state energy convenient as variation parameter optimum value @xmath24 related to optimum box size @xmath19 @xmath25 @xmath24 obtained expressing @xmath26 @xmath23 solving @xmath27 for @xmath24 optimized approximate eigenenergies obtained from @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30@xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 approximate eigenenergies free harmonic oscillator @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 approximate eigenstates harmonic oscillator @xmath41,1,2,3 optimized eigenfunctions @xmath42 approximate eigenstates free harmonic oscillator free harmonic oscillator quantum mechanical quantized exactly expressions eigenenergies wavefunctions derived book quantum mechanics quantum numbers @xmath43 energy eigenvalues by @xmath44 normalized wavefunctions @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 hermite polynomial @xmath48 hermite polynomials @xmath49 approximate exact eigenenergies free dimensional linear harmonic oscillator @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 plotted figure fig functions harmonic oscillator quantum number @xmath53 agreement between @xmath36 @xmath26 remarkable low quantum numbers exact eigenenergies @xmath26 free harmonic oscillator illustrate agreement variation results exact wavefunctions free harmonic oscillator plot approximate exact wavefunctions functions of position ground state first excited state@xmath54 @xmath55 correlation between @xmath56 @xmath57 taylor series expansion functions @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 approximate ground state wavefunction @xmath61 exact ground state wavefunction @xmath62 free harmonic oscillator @xmath63 figure fig.q96gfpe functions position exact ground state @xmath62 functions position @xmath63 first excited state @xmath64 @xmath65 state @xmath66 functions position variation of @xmath67 @xmath68 position figure fig.wipsqc4 normalized orthogonal wavefunctions free - particle - in - a - box model variation obtained approximate energy eigenvalues eigenstates one dimensional free harmonic oscillator @xmath0 classical frequency @xmath13 quantum numbers @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath39 | 0.31202 | 1,777 | 946 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,775 | we use archival _ xmm - newton _ observations of ark 564 and mrk 335 to calculate the frequency dependent time - lags for these two well - studied sources .
we discover high - frequency fe k lags in both sources , indicating that the red wing of the line precedes the rest frame energy by roughly 100 s and 150 s for ark 564 and mrk 335 , respectively . including these two new sources , fe k reverberation lags
have been observed in seven seyfert galaxies .
we examine the low - frequency lag - energy spectrum , which is smooth , and shows no feature of reverberation , as would be expected if the low - frequency lags were produced by distant reflection off circumnuclear material .
the clear differences in the low and high frequency lag - energy spectra indicate that the lags are produced by two distinct physical processes . finally , we find that the amplitude of the fe k lag scales with black hole mass for these seven sources , consistent with a relativistic reflection model where the lag is the light travel delay associated with reflection of continuum photons off the inner disc .
[ firstpage ] black hole physics galaxies : active x - rays : galaxies [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] lastly , we comment briefly on the apparent weak non - stationarity in the light curves ( as noted by * ? ? ?
* through the lag - frequency spectrum and psd ) .
fig .
[ ark_redblue ] shows that the first half of the 500 ks observation peaks at the rest frame of the fe k line , presumably from a larger emitting region , while at slightly higher frequencies , the second half shows a broader lag peaking at 45 kev , the red wing of the fe k line from a smaller emitting region .
while the non - stationarity of the light curves is not currently well understood , it does provide tantalizing evidence for further behavior that will be accessible either through much deeper observations or future observatories .
the case for relativistic reflection continues to grow with recent discoveries of the fe k reverberation lag @xcite that is now seen in seven sources , flux - dependent reverberation lags @xcite , the black hole mass scaling relation with lag @xcite , and reverberation lags in a black hole x - ray binary @xcite and possibly a neutron star @xcite . the work presented here on ark 564 and mrk 335 support a relativistic reflection model and are not consistent with partial covering .
the study of x - ray reverberation lags is quickly developing , and is revealing a new perspective through which to probe strong gravity . | this work is based on observations obtained with _ xmm - newton _ , an esa science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by esa member states and nasa .
ek thanks the gates cambridge scholarship .
acf thanks the royal society .
the authors thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments . | work based observations xmm - newton esa science mission funded esa states nasa ek thanks gates cambridge scholarship acf royal society authors thank anonymous referee | 0.067383 | 61 | 29 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,785 | we consider non linear generalizations of fractal interpolating functions applied to functions of one and two variables . the use of such interpolating functions in resizing images is illustrated . | an iterated function system ( ifs ) may be used to construct fractal interpolation functions for some data @xcite .
the simplest example of interpolating a function @xmath0 , given data points ( @xmath1 ) , @xmath2 , starts with an ifs @xmath3 the coefficients @xmath4 , and @xmath5 determined from the conditions , for @xmath6 , @xmath7 which leads to @xmath8 with these , the transformation of eq .
( [ onevar ] ) can be written as @xmath9 in which form it is apparent @xmath10 is determined by a linear ( in @xmath11 ) interpolating function between the points ( @xmath12 ) and ( @xmath13 ) .
graphs of fractal interpolating functions can then be made by applying the random iteration algorithm : * initialize ( @xmath14 ) to a point in the interval of interest * for a set number of iterations * * randomly select a transformation @xmath15 * * plot ( @xmath16 ) @xmath17 * * set ( @xmath14 ) @xmath18 ( @xmath16 ) * end for in this paper we consider two non linear generalizations of such fractal interpolating functions .
the first concerns how to extend the linear interpolation of eq .
( [ linint ] ) to higher degree interpolations .
the second generalization arises when one considers the construction of fractal interpolating functions for functions of two ( or more ) variables in this case , even a linear interpolation of the form of eq .
( [ linint ] ) , when applied to each variable , will result in a non linear interpolating function .
this has an obvious application in representing two dimensional images , where a function of two variables ( the pixel coordinates ) could represent a black and white image ( using a boolean function ) , a gray scale image ( using a scalar function ) , or a colour image ( using a vector valued function of the three _ rgb _ [ red , green , blue ] values ) .
this problem has been examined extensively in the context of image compression @xcite ; in the last section we consider a related problem of using these iterated function systems to rescale images , or portions thereof .
we first consider a function @xmath19 of two variables , and examine the problem of constructing a fractal interpolating function from the data @xmath20 , where @xmath21 , @xmath22 , and @xmath23 . to this end , consider the transformation @xmath24 we then impose , for @xmath25 and @xmath6 the conditions @xmath26 the coefficients turn out to be @xmath27 with these , the transformation of eq .
( [ twovar ] ) can be written as @xmath28 in which form it is apparent @xmath29 is determined by a function implementing a linear interpolation over the grid ( @xmath30 ) , ( @xmath31 ) , ( @xmath32 ) , and ( @xmath33 ) .
the interpolating functions considered up to now have used a linear interpolating formula between adjacent points to construct the ifs . in this section
we indicate how this can be generalized to quadratic interpolations . for a function @xmath0 of one variable , using data points ( @xmath1 ) , @xmath2 , consider the transformations @xmath34 and impose the conditions , for @xmath35 , @xmath36 the point @xmath37 is determined as @xmath38 with corresponding point @xmath39 .
the coefficients of the ifs are determined as @xmath40 with which the transformation can be written as @xmath41 in this form we see that a quadratic ( in @xmath42 ) interpolating function is used between the points ( @xmath13 ) , ( @xmath12 ) , and ( @xmath43 ) .
we next consider a function @xmath19 of two variables , and construct a fractal interpolating function which employs a quadratic interpolation between points . to this end , consider the transformation @xmath44 we then impose , for @xmath45 and @xmath35 , the conditions @xmath46 the points @xmath47 and @xmath48 are determined as @xmath49 along with the corresponding @xmath50 points .
the coefficients of the ifs can then be determined , by which the transformation of eq .
( [ cond2 ] ) can be written as @xmath51 although tedious to work out , the generalization of the preceding considerations to higher order interpolating functions is straightforward in principle .
as an application of the preceding , in this section we consider the task of rescaling a colour image .
this is a natural problem for an interpolating function of two variables ( @xmath52 ) interpreted as pixel coordinates the function @xmath53 in this case will be a vector valued function having three components representing the _ rgb _ value of the pixel specifying the amount of red , green , and blue present .
the procedure used to scale an image of size @xmath54 pixels wide by @xmath55 pixels high is as follows .
we first read in the rgb values of each pixel of the image , and use that as the data to construct a fractal interpolating function @xmath56 , where @xmath57 and @xmath58 .
to then resize the image , so that the resulting image is of size @xmath59 , we construct a new fractal interpolating function @xmath60 . applying the random iteration algorithm to @xmath61 , choosing independently a transformation index ( @xmath62 ) at each stage , will then result in the rescaled image .
the generalization of this procedure to rescale a portion of an image is straightforward . as examples of the results of this procedure ,
consider the figures in the appendix .
we start with the image appearing in fig .
[ lena ] , and zoom in on the area of the face .
the result appears in fig .
[ lena - face ] , together with a comparison done using a simple linear interpolation scheme . zooming further into the area of the eye results in fig .
[ lena - eye ] , again with a comparison of the result of a simple linear interpolation .
generally , the number of iterations needed in the random iteration algorithm to produce acceptable images is of the order of @xmath59 , where the original image is of size @xmath63 . also , while slower , the quadratic fractal interpolating function typically produces , for the same number of iterations , a `` smoother '' looking image than the corresponding linear interpolating function .
however , as with all interpolation schemes , there comes a point where such higher order interpolating formulas actually start to produce worse results due to an artificially high sensitivity to fluctuations in the data .
some informal tests of this procedure seems to indicate that better results are obtained for images of people , natural scenery , etc .
, as opposed to those containing lettering , simple geometric shapes , and similar constructs .
this might be expected , given the general fractal nature of such objects in nature . however , as with all interpolating functions , it is important to remember that no structural information beyond that of the original image is being provided ( for example , one could not zoom in on the face of fig .
[ lena ] to such a degree as to see individual skin pores ) .
the preceding demonstrates that these non linear fractal interpolating functions of two variables can be used in principle to represent images
. it would be interesting to extend these considerations to the case of partitioned iterated function systems , upon which much work has been done with respect to compressing images @xcite .
work along these directions is in progress .
this work was supported by the natural sciences and engineering research council of canada .
99 m. f. barnsley , _ fractals everywhere _ ( academic press , san diego , ca , 1993 ) h. o. peitgen , h. jrgens , and d. saupe , _ chaos and fractals new frontiers of science _ ( springer verlag , new york , 1992 )
. h. o. peitgen and d. saupe , _ the science of fractal images _ ( springer verlag , new york , 1988 ) .
a. jacquin , ieee trans . on image processing , january , 1992 .
m. barnsley , l. hurd , and l. anson , _ fractal image compression _ ( a. k. peters , new york , 1993 )
. y. fisher ( editor ) , _ fractal image compression : theory and application _ ( springer verlag , new york , 1995 ) .
r. massopust , _ fractal functions , fractal surfaces and wavelets _ ( academic press , san diego , ca , 1994 ) . | iterated function system fractal interpolation functions for data @xcite example interpolating function @xmath0 data points @xmath1 @xmath2 starts with ifs @xmath3 coefficients @xmath4 @xmath5 determined from conditions @xmath6 @xmath7 leads to @xmath8 transformation of eq . written as @xmath9 @xmath10 determined by linear @xmath11 ) interpolating function between points @xmath12 @xmath13 ) of fractal interpolating functions random iteration algorithm initialize @xmath14 ) to point interval interest set number iterations randomly select transformation @xmath15 plot @xmath16 ) @xmath17 set @xmath14 ) @xmath18 @xmath16 ) end two non linear generalizations of fractal interpolating functions first linear interpolation of eq . to higher degree interpolations second generalization construction fractal interpolating functions for functions two or more variables linear interpolation form eq . linint applied each variable in non linear interpolating function application representing two dimensional images function of two variables pixel coordinates represent black and white gray scale scalar colour image vector valued functionproblem examined image compression @xcite last section consider related problem using iterated function systems rescale images consider function @xmath19 of two variables constructing fractal interpolating function from data @xmath20 @xmath21 consider transformation @xmath24 impose for @xmath25 @xmath6 conditions @xmath26 coefficients @xmath27 transformation eq written as @xmath28 @xmath29 determined by function implementing linear interpolation over grid @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath33 ) interpolating functions used linear interpolating formula between points to quadratic interpolations function @xmath0 of one variable using data points @xmath1 @xmath2 consider transformations @xmath34 impose conditions for @xmath35 @xmath36 point @xmath37 determined as @xmath38 point @xmath39 coefficients of ifs determined as @xmath40 transformation written as @xmath41 quadratic @xmath42 interpolating function used between points @xmath13 @xmath12 @xmath43 ) consider function @xmath19 of two variables construct fractal interpolating function quadratic interpolation between pointsconsider transformation @xmath44 impose for @xmath45 @xmath35 conditions @xmath46 points @xmath47 determined as @xmath49 @xmath50 points coefficients of ifs determined transformation of eq . ( [ cond2 ] ) written as @xmath51 generalization to higher order interpolating functions straightforward consider rescaling colour image natural problem for interpolating function of two variables @xmath52 ) pixel coordinates function @xmath53 vector valued function three components rgb _ value pixel red green blue procedure to scale image @xmath54 pixels wide @xmath55 pixels high read rgb values each pixel construct fractal interpolating function @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 resize image size @xmath59 construct new fractal interpolating function @xmath60 random iteration algorithm to @xmath61 choosing transformation index ( @xmath62 ) each stage in rescaled image generalization procedure to rescale portion of image straightforward consider figures in appendix start with image fig . [ lena ] zoom on area face result in fig . [ lena - face ] comparison using simple linear interpolation schemezooming into eye results in fig . [ lena - eye ] simple linear interpolation number of iterations needed in random iteration algorithm acceptable images @xmath59 original image @xmath63 slower quadratic fractal interpolating function produces same iterations smoother image than linear function higher order formulas produce worse results due to high sensitivity to fluctuations data tests better results for images of people natural scenery lettering geometric shapes constructs fractal nature of objects no structural information beyond original image provided zoom in on face of fig . [ lena ] see skin pores non linear fractal interpolating functions of two variables can to represent images to extend considerations to partitioned iterated function systems work compressing images @xcite work in progress work supported by natural sciences and engineering research council of canada m. f. barnsley , _ fractals everywhere _ ( academic press san diego 1993 ) h. o. peitgen , h. jrgens d. saupe , _ chaos and fractals new frontiers of science _ ( springer verlag new york 1992 )peitgen d. saupe science fractal images springer verlag new york 1988 jacquin image processing january 1992 barnsley. hurd anson fractal image compression k. peters new york 1993 fisher editor fractal image compression theory application springer verlag new york 1995. massopust fractal functions surfaces wavelets academic press san diego ca 1994 | 0.312793 | 1,906 | 992 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,791 | so far , all relativistically boosted jets with superluminal motion have only been detected in typical radio galaxies with early type host galaxies .
we have now discovered superluminal motion in the seyfert i galaxy iii zw 2 , classified as a spiral .
the lower limit for the apparent expansion speed is @xmath0 .
spectral and spatial evolution are closely linked . before and after this rapid expansion
we have seen a period of virtually no expansion with an expansion speed less than @xmath1 . however , at 15 ghz the picture is completely different .
iii zw 2 shows slow expansion ( @xmath2 ) during the time of no expansion at 43 ghz and no expansion during the rapid expansion at 43 ghz . the difference between the two frequencies
is qualitatively explained by optical - depth effects in an inflating- balloon model , describing the evolution of radio lobes on an ultra - compact scale .
the stop - and - go behavior could be explained by a jet interacting with a molecular cloud or the molecular torus .
since iii zw 2 is also part of a sample of so- called radio - intermediate quasars ( riq ) , it confirms earlier predictions of superluminal motion for this source , based on the argument that riqs could be relativistically boosted jets in radio - weak quasars and seyfert galaxies .
psfig.sty # 1#1 0123456789 abcdef @mtlplain@loaded
= cmssi10 = cmssi10 = cmssi10 = cmmib10 = mtssi10 = mtssbx10 = mtssbi10 = mtmib10 @mtlplain@loaded = cmmib10 at 10pt = cmmib10 at 7pt = cmmib10 at 5pt = = = = " 0103 @mtlplain@loaded @mtlplain@loaded = cmbsy10 = cmbsy10 at 7pt = cmbsy10 at 5pt = = = @ = " 0@72 _ in : `` proceedings of the 5th evn symposium '' , eds
. j. conway , a. polatidis , r. booth .
_ _ onsala space observatory , chalmers technical university , gothenburg , sweden ( 2000 ) _ | if we plot the radio - to - optical flux ratio of quasars , we see two populations , the radio quiet and the radio loud quasars with a few sources , radio intermediate quasars ( riqs ) , between them
. whilst in total flux , riqs appear to be part of the radio - loud distribution , their low extended flux indicates that they might rather be part of the radio - weak distribution .
falcke et al .
( 1996 ) and miller et al .
( 1993 ) proposed that the riqs might be relativistically boosted radio - weak quasars .
iii zw 2 ( pg 0007 + 106 , mrk 1501 , @xmath3=0.089 ) is one of the riqs and also is one of the most extremely variable radio sources .
it was initially classified as a seyfert 1 galaxy ( e.g. , arp 1968 ; khachitikian & weedman 1974 ; osterbrock 1977 ) but was later also included in the pg quasar sample ( schmidt & green 1983 ) .
iii zw 2 most likely has a spiral host galaxy ( hutchings & campbell 1983 ; taylor et al .
it is a core - dominated agn with highly inverted synchrotron spectrum with a spectral peak due to self - absorption at 43 ghz ( falcke et al .
1999 ) in outburst and faint extended structure typical for seyfert galaxies .
iii zw 2 is variable up to a factor of 30 within two years with major flares roughly every five years ( see fig .
1 ) . in 1997 , iii zw 2 started a new outburst and we started to monitor this source with the vla and vlba .
we observed iii zw 2 in 27 epochs with the vla in six frequencies ranging from 1.4 to 43 ghz and in 6 epochs with the vlba at 15 and 43 ghz .
the spectral peak stayed constant at 43 ghz during the slow and smooth rise in flux density and we detected no structural change on vlbi scale at 43 ghz during this time ( see first three epochs of fig.3 ) . in december 1998 , the flux density started to drop rapidly , 2.5 times faster than it rose . at the same time the spectral peak dropped quickly from 43 ghz to 15 ghz during a few months ( see fig.2 ) . applying a simple equipartition jet model we predicted a very rapid expansion during this time .
indeed the fifth epoch of vlba observations showed a drastic structural change on milliarcsecond scales with an apparent expansion speed of @xmath4 ( brunthaler et al .
this expansion speed increases to @xmath5 if one considers the time range during which the drop in peak frequency occurred . after this phase of superluminal expansion and rapid spectral evolution
, the expansion stopped and the spectral evolution slowed down .
however , at 15 ghz the picture is completely different .
iii zw 2 shows a slow expansion ( @xmath2 ) during the first four epochs , no expansion during the decrease in flux density and again slow expansion when the expansion at 43 ghz stopped again ( see fig .
this apparent contradiction can be explained by optical depth effects in an inflating - balloon model.
in this model , the initial phase of the flux density rise can be explained by a relativistic jet interacting with the interstellar medium or a torus that creates a shock .
a relativistic shock was proposed earlier by falcke et al .
( 1999 ) due to synchrotron cooling times of 14 - 50 days which is much shorter than the duration of the outburst .
the ultra - compact hotspots are pumped up and powered by the jet and are responsible for the flux - density increase .
the post - shock material expands with the maximum sound speed of a magnetized relativistic plasma of @xmath6 .
since the source is optically thick at 15 ghz , one necessarily observes the outside of the source , i.e. the post - shock material expanding at the sound speed . at 43 ghz ,
the source is optically thin and one can look inside the source and see the stationary hotspots .
the rapid expansion at 43 ghz thereafter has marked the phase where the jet breaks free and starts to propagate relativistically into a lower - density medium until it stopped again .
the unique and simple structure and timescales of such outbursts within 5 years makes iii zw 2 an ideal source to study radio - jet evolution relevant also to radio galaxies , especially those that appear as csos and gpss .
iii zw 2 remains an extremely unusual object .
so far all relativistically - boosted jets with superluminal motion and typical blazars have been detected in early type galaxies ( e.g. , scarpa et al .
we detected for the first time superluminal motion in a spiral galaxy and the good agreement between structural and spectral evolution demonstrates that we are dealing with real physical expansion and not only a phase velocity .
since one has to look very carefully with frequent time sampling to detect this superluminal motion , it is possible that other seyferts and radio quiet quasars also have relativistic jets in their nuclei .
the fact that the sub - pc jet could be relativistic while they appear sub - relativistic at larger scales ( roy et al .
2000 ) , raises the question : are seyfert - jets decelerated on the pc - scale ? | plot radio - to - optical flux ratio quasars two populations radio quiet loud quasars few sources radio intermediate quasars riqs between flux riqs part radio - loud distribution low extended flux radio - weak distribution falcke et 1996 miller et al 1993 proposed riqs relativistically boosted radio - weak quasars iii zw 2 ( pg 0007 + 106 , mrk 1501 , @xmath3=0.089 ) one riqs variable radio initially classified seyfert 1 galaxy included pg quasar sample iii zw 2 spiral host galaxy core - dominated agn inverted synchrotron spectrum peak self - absorption at 43 ghz faint extended structure typical seyfert galaxies iii zw 2 variable to factor of 30 within two years major flares every five years fig . 1 1997 started new outburst vla vlba observed iii zw 2 in 27 epochs vla six frequencies 1.4 to 43 ghz 6 epochs vlba at 15 and 43 ghzspectral peak constant at 43 ghz during rise in flux density no structural change on vlbi scale at first three epochs fig.3 december 1998 flux density rapidly 2.5 times faster than spectral peak dropped quickly from 43 to 15 ghz months fig.2 model predicted rapid expansion fifth epoch showed drastic structural change expansion speed of @xmath4 expansion speed increases to @xmath5 after expansion expansion stopped evolution slowed down at 15 ghz different 2 slow expansion ( @xmath2 first four epochs no expansion during decrease flux density slow expansion when at 43 ghz stopped contradiction explained by optical depth effects in inflating - balloon model initial flux density rise relativistic jet with interstellar medium shock relativistic shock proposed by falcke et al . due to synchrotron cooling times 14 - 50 days shorter outburst ultra - compact hotspots powered by jet responsible for flux - density increase post - shock material expands with maximum sound speed of magnetized relativistic plasma of @xmath6 source thick at 15 ghz observes outside post - shock material expanding at sound speed at 43 ghz source optically thin stationary hotspots rapid expansion at 43 ghz jet breaks free into lower - density medium unique structure timescales outbursts within 5 years iii zw 2 ideal radio - jet evolution radio galaxies csos gpss iii zw 2 unusual object relativistically - boosted jets with superluminal motion blazars detected in early galaxies first time superluminal motion in spiral galaxy agreement structural spectral evolution real physical expansion not phase velocity frequent sampling detect superluminal motion possible other seyferts radio quiet quasars have relativistic jets in nuclei sub - pc jet be relativistic sub - relativistic at larger scales question are seyfert - jets decelerated on pc - scale ? | 0.186521 | 1,207 | 601 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,803 | we report on our numerical implementation of fully relativistic hydrodynamics coupled to einstein s field equations in three spatial dimensions .
we briefly review several steps in our code development , including our recasting of einstein s equations and several tests which demonstrate its advantages for numerical integrations .
we outline our implementation of relativistic hydrodynamics , and present numerical results for the evolution of both stable and unstable oppenheimer - volkov equilibrium stars , which represent a very promising first test of our code . | the physics of compact objects is entering a particularly exciting phase .
new instruments , including x - ray and gamma - ray satellites and the new neutrino observatories sno and super - kamiokande , can now yield unprecedented observations of neutron stars and black holes .
perhaps most excitingly , the new gravitational wave detectors ligo , tama , geo and virgo promise to open a gravitational wave window to the universe and make gravitational wave astronomy a reality ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
simultaneously , the availability of computational resources at modern supercomputers makes the simulation of realistic astrophysical scenarios involving relativistic compact objects feasable .
several groups , including two `` grand challenge alliances '' @xcite , have launched efforts to construct numerical codes capable of solving einstein s equations with or without matter sources in three dimensions , and simulating the merger of black hole or neutron star binaries ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
numerical simulations will be necessary to predict the gravitational wave form from such processes to increase the likelihood of detections and , ultimately , to extract physical information from observations . even though much progress has recently been made ( see @xcite for the most recent developments ) , significant obstacles still remain . in this contribution , we report on our systematic approach towards constructing such a numerical code .
we first review our formulation of einstein s equations and describe several tests , both for vacuum spacetimes and analytical matter sources , which demonstrate its advantages for numerical integrations .
we then outline our implementation of hydrodynamics , and present promising numerical test results .
we adopt geometrized units ( g = c = 1 ) and the convention that greek indices run from 0 to 3 , while latin indices only run from 1 to 3 .
most numerical implementations of einstein s equations adopt a cauchy formulation based on the 3 + 1 formulation by arnowitt , deser and misner ( @xcite , see , e.g. , @xcite for an alternative characteristic formulation )
. however , a straightforward implementation of these `` undressed '' adm equations tends to develop instabilities even for the evolution of small amplitude gravitational waves on a flat background ( compare @xcite ) . following shibata and nakamura @xcite and the spirit of many earlier one and two - dimensional codes @xcite , we have recently developed a modification of the adm equations which proves to be much more suitable for numerical implementations @xcite .
more specifically , we modify the adm equations in two ways . first , we split the spatial metric @xmath0 into a conformal factor @xmath1 and a conformally related metric @xmath2 according to @xmath3 and evolve @xmath4 and @xmath2 separately .
we choose @xmath4 such that @xmath5 , and similarly split the extrinsic curvature into its trace and its trace - free part .
this split separates the `` radiative '' variables from the `` non - radiative '' variables in the spirit of the `` york - lichnerowicz '' decomposition @xcite . in the second stage
we introduce `` conformal connection functions '' @xmath6 as independent functions ( compare @xcite ) .
some of the mixed second derivatives of @xmath2 in the conformal , spatial ricci tensor @xmath7 can now be written as first derivatives of the @xmath8 . as a result
, @xmath7 becomes a manifestly elliptic operator on the metric @xmath9 .
the analogous technique was used for the four - dimensional ricci tensor @xmath10 as early as in the 1920 s to make einstein s equations manifestly hyperbolic @xcite . for more details of our formulation , including an evolution equation for the @xmath11 , the reader is referred to @xcite ( see also the mathematical analysis in @xcite , and further numerical applications in @xcite ) . in @xcite , we tested this form of einstein s equations for small amplitude gravitational waves , and found that it performs far better than a similar implementation of the original adm formulation .
in particular , we found that we could evolve such waves with harmonic slicing without encountering growing instabilities , whereas the original adm code crashed after about 35 light - crossing times for the same initial data . in @xcite
, we inserted analytic matter sources on the right hand side of einstein s equations and evolved the fields in their presence .
this approach allows us to study the numerical properties of the field evolution in the presence of highly relativistic matter sources without having to solve the equations of hydrodynamics : `` hydro - without - hydro '' .
we inserted the oppenheimer - snyder solution for a relativistic , static star to test the long term stability of the evolution code , and the oppenheimer - volkov solution for the collapse of a sphere of dust to a schwarzschild black hole .
these simulations focus on the highly relativistic , longitudinal fields , and complement our earlier tests involving dynamical transverse fields in @xcite . with the code having passed these tests , we are now implementing both collisionless matter , which will be described elsewhere , and hydrodynamics , as described below , to evolve the matter self - consistently with the fields .
for a perfect fluid , the stress - energy tensor can be written @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the rest mass density , @xmath14 the specific internal density , @xmath15 the pressure , @xmath16 the fluid four velocity , and @xmath17 the four dimensional spacetime metric .
we construct constant entropy initial data with a polytropic equation of state @xmath18 where @xmath19 and @xmath20 is the polytropic index , and where we assume the polytropic constant @xmath21 to be unity without loss of generality . during the evolution
, we adopt the gamma - law relation appropriate for adiabatic flow , @xmath22 following @xcite , we write the equation of continuity @xmath23 and the equations of motion @xmath24 in the form @xmath25 here we have defined the auxiliary quantities @xmath26 similar equations have been used by many other groups ( e.g. @xcite and references therein ) .
we integrate equations ( [ e : twb:1 ] ) - ( [ e : twb:2 ] ) with an artificial viscosity scheme suggested in @xcite ( see @xcite for implementations of more elaborate shock capturing schemes ) . given @xmath27 , @xmath28 and @xmath29 on a new timelevel , @xmath30 can be found iteratively from the normalization relation @xmath31 , which yields @xmath32 the matter sources for the right hand sides of einstein s equations can then be constructed from these variables .
as a first test of our implementation of hydrodynamics , we adopt the oppenheimer - volkov solution describing equilibrium neutron stars in spherical symmetry as initial data and evolve these dynamically . constructing a sequence of such oppenheimer - volkov solutions for increasing central rest mass densities @xmath33 , the adm mass @xmath34 of the star takes a maximum @xmath35 at @xmath36 ( see the left panel in figure 1 ) . for central densities smaller than @xmath36 ,
the star is in stable equilibrium , while for @xmath37 it is unstable and will collapse to a black hole .
we adopt a polytropic equation of state with @xmath38 ( @xmath39 ) , for which @xmath40 and @xmath41 when @xmath42 .
we choose as initial data the two configurations marked with filled circles in figure 1 ; a stable configuration with @xmath43 , @xmath44 and @xmath45 , and an unstable configuration with @xmath46 , @xmath47 and @xmath48 . in the right panel of figure 1
, we show the central density as a function of time for the two initial configurations .
we performed these runs on quite modest numerical grids with @xmath49 gridpoints using cartesian coordinates and imposing outgoing wave boundary conditions at @xmath50 .
we employ harmonic slicing and zero shift .
as expected , the unstable configuration soon collapses , while the stable configuration remains stable for several dynamical timescales ( the period of the fundamental radial oscillation for a @xmath51 configuration is approximately @xmath52 , compare @xcite ) .
ultimately , accumulation of numerical error causes this configuration to collapse too , but this can be delayed by increasing the grid resolution . in figure
2 we show density contours at the beginning and towards the end of the simulation for the unstable configuration with @xmath53 initially . we also include arrows indicating the fluid flow @xmath29
. the star is rapidly contracting and collapsing to a black hole .
up to the late stage of the collapse , the mass @xmath34 is conserved to about 5 % .
we can follow the collapse to about a 18 fold increase of the central density . by this time
, the central lapse has decreased from 0.4 initially to about 0.03 .
we report on our systematic approach towards constructing a fully relativistic hydrodynamics code in three spatial dimensions . as part of this program ,
we have developed a new formulation of einstein s equations which in several tests and applications has proved to be much more suitable for numerical implementations than the traditional adm formulation @xcite .
mathematical properties of this formulation have been analyzed in @xcite .
we have studied the evolution of small amplitude gravitational waves to test dynamical transverse fields and have inserted analytical solutions as matter sources ( hydro - without - hydro ) to test highly relativistic longitudinal fields .
we outline our implementation of the relativistic equations of hydrodynamics and present preliminary test results for spherical neutron stars in hydrostatic equilibrium ( oppenheimer - volkov stars ) .
as expected , we find that stable stars remain stable for several dynamical timescales , while unstable stars soon collapse to black holes .
we conclude that our method seems like a very promising approach towards simulating the final plunge and merger of binary neutron stars . on a more speculative note , we point out that fully self - consistent hydrodynamics may not be a feasable approach towards simulating the coalescence and gravitational wave emission from neutron stars in the intermediate inspiral phase . in this epoch ,
the stars are very close and interact through a strongly relativistic tidal field , but reside outside the innermost stable circular orbit and hence move on a nearly circular orbit .
simulating the slow inspiral would require evolving the stars for hundreds or thousands of orbits , which is presently impossible .
it may be possible , however , to insert known quasi - equilibrium binary configurations ( e.g. @xcite ) into the field evolution code to get the transverse wave components approximately . decreasing the orbital separation ( and increasing the binding energy ) at the rate consistent with the computed outflow of gravitational - wave energy
would generate an approximate strong - field wave inspiral pattern .
such a `` hydro - without - hydro '' calculation may yield an approximate gravitational waveform from inspiraling neutron stars , without having to couple the matter and field integrations .
calculations were performed on sgi cray origin2000 computer systems at the national center for supercomputing applications , university of illinois at urbana - champaign .
this work was supported by nsf grants ast 96 - 18524 and phy 99 - 02833 and nasa grant nag 5 - 7152 at illinois .
for example : j. m. bardeen and t. piran , _ phys . rep .
_ * 96 * , 205 ( 1983 ) ; c. r. evans , phd thesis , university of texas at austin ( 1984 ) ; a. m. abrahams and c. r. evans , _ phys . rev
. d _ * 37 * , 318 ( 1988 ) ; a. m. abrahams , g. b. cook , s. l. shapiro and s. a. teukolsky , _ phys .
d _ * 49 * , 5153 ( 1994 ) . | physics of compact objects exciting phase new instruments x - gamma - ray satellites neutrino observatories sno super - kamiokande yield unprecedented observations of neutron stars black holes gravitational wave detectors ligo tama geo virgo promise open gravitational wave window wave astronomy reality computational resources supercomputers simulation of realistic astrophysical scenarios compact objects feasable groups launched efforts construct numerical codes solving einstein s equations three dimensions simulating merger of black hole neutron star binaries numerical simulations predict gravitational wave form increase detections extract physical information from observations progress made obstacles remain report on systematic approach towards constructing numerical code review formulation of einstein s equations describe tests for vacuum spacetimes analytical matter sources outline implementation of hydrodynamics present promising numerical test results adopt geometrized units g = c = 1 ) greek indices run 0 to 3 latin indices 1 to 3 numerical implementations of einstein s equations adopt cauchy formulation based on 3 + 1 formulation by arnowitt deser misner@xcite alternative characteristic formulation straightforward implementation undressed adm equations instabilities small amplitude gravitational waves flat background compare @xcite following shibata nakamura @xcite earlier dimensional codes developed modification adm equations suitable for numerical implementations modify equations two split spatial metric @xmath0 into conformal factor @xmath1 related @xmath2 evolve @xmath4 @xmath2 separately choose @xmath4 @xmath5 split extrinsic curvature into trace trace - free part split separates radiative variables from non - radiative variables york - lichnerowicz decomposition @xcite introduce conformal connection functions @xmath6 as independent functions mixed second derivatives of @xmath2 @xmath7 written as first derivatives @xmath8 @xmath7 becomes elliptic operator on metric @xmath9 analogous technique used four - dimensional ricci tensor @xmath10 1920 s einstein s equations hyperbolic @xcite more details formulation evolution equation @xmath11 reader referred to @xcite see mathematical analysis @xcite numerical applications@xcite tested einstein s equations for small amplitude gravitational waves better than original adm formulation evolve waves with harmonic slicing without instabilities original adm code crashed after 35 light - crossing times inserted analytic matter sources on right side of einstein s equations evolved fields approach study numerical properties field evolution relativistic matter sources without equations hydrodynamics inserted oppenheimer - snyder solution for relativistic static star oppenheimer - volkov solution for collapse of sphere of dust to schwarzschild black hole simulations focus on relativistic longitudinal fields complement tests dynamical transverse fields code passed tests implementing collisionless matter and hydrodynamics to evolve matter self - consistently fields for perfect fluid stress - energy tensor written @xmath12 rest mass density specific internal density pressure fluid four velocity four dimensional spacetime metric construct constant entropy initial data with polytropic equation of state @xmath18 and polytropic index assume polytropic constant @xmath21 unity without loss of generalityevolution adopt gamma - law relation for adiabatic flow @xmath22 write equation continuity @xmath23 equations motion @xmath24 @xmath25 defined auxiliary quantities @xmath26 similar equations used other groups @xcite integrate equations e : twb:1 - e : twb:2 ] with artificial viscosity scheme @xcite @xmath27 @xmath29 new timelevel @xmath30 found from normalization relation @xmath31 yields @xmath32 matter sources right hand sides einstein s equations constructed from variables first hydrodynamics adopt oppenheimer - volkov solution equilibrium neutron stars spherical symmetry evolve dynamically sequence solutions increasing central rest mass densities @xmath33 adm mass @xmath34 star maximum @xmath35 @xmath36 figure 1 densities smaller than star stable equilibrium @xmath37 unstable collapse to black hole adopt polytropic equation of state with @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 choose initial data two configurations circles figure 1 stable @xmath43 unstable @xmath46 @xmath48right panel figure 1 central density function time for two initial configurations performed runs on modest grids with @xmath49 gridpoints cartesian coordinates outgoing wave boundary conditions at @xmath50 harmonic slicing zero shift unstable configuration collapses stable remains stable timescales fundamental radial oscillation @xmath51 configuration approximately @xmath52 numerical error causes collapse delayed increasing grid resolution figure 2 density contours beginning end simulation unstable configuration @xmath53 arrows fluid flow @xmath29 star contracting collapsing to black hole late stage collapse mass @xmath34 conserved to 5 % collapse 18 fold increase central density central lapse decreased from 0.4 to 0.03 report systematic approach relativistic hydrodynamics code three spatial dimensions developed new formulation of einstein s equations suitable for numerical implementations than traditional formulation @xcite mathematical properties analyzed in @xcite studied evolution small amplitude gravitational waves inserted analytical solutions matter sources hydro - without - hydro test relativistic longitudinal fieldsoutline implementation relativistic equations hydrodynamics present test results spherical neutron stars hydrostatic equilibrium stable stars remain stable unstable stars collapse to black holes method promising simulating final plunge merger binary neutron stars self - consistent hydrodynamics feasable coalescence gravitational wave emission neutron stars intermediate inspiral phase stars close interact relativistic tidal field outside stable circular orbit move nearly circular orbit simulating slow inspiral evolving stars hundreds orbits impossible insert quasi - equilibrium binary configurations field evolution code transverse wave components decreasing orbital separation increasing binding energy consistent outflow gravitational - wave energy strong - field wave inspiral pattern hydro - without - hydro calculation yield approximate gravitational waveform inspiraling neutron stars without matter field integrations calculations performed sgi cray origin2000 computer systems national center supercomputing applications university illinois - supported by nsf grants 96 - 18524 99 - 02833 nasa grant 5 - 7152 illinois j. m. bardeen t. piran phys . rep . 96, 205 ( 1983 )evans phd thesis university texas austin 1984 ) a m abrahams r evans phys . rev 37 318 1988 ) abrahams b cook s l shapiro s teukolsky . 49 5153 1994 ) | 0.446841 | 2,590 | 1,286 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,804 | if gravitons are super - strong interacting particles which fulfill a flat non - expanding universe , we would have another possibility to explain cosmological redshifts - in a frame of non - kinematic model .
it is shown by the author that in this case sne 1a data may be understood without any dark energy and dark matter .
a value of relaxation factor is found in this paper . in this approach , we have newton s law of gravity as a simplest consequence , and the connection between newton s and hubble s constants . a value of the latter may be theoretically predicted . | if one assumes that the graviton background exists with the planckian spectrum and an effective temperature @xmath0 , which we will consider in a flat space - time , an energy of any photon decreases with a distance @xmath1 so a redshift @xmath2 is equal to @xcite : @xmath3 here @xmath4 where the hubble constant @xmath5 @xmath6 is an average graviton energy , @xmath7 is the stephan - boltzmann constant , @xmath8 is a new constant .
it is necessary to have the following value of this constant : @xmath9 i.e. gravitons should be super - strong interacting particles . in this approach ,
the newton constant @xmath10 is connected with @xmath11 that gives the following value of it @xcite : @xmath12 by @xmath13 additional photon flux s average energy losses on a way @xmath14 due to rejection of a part of photons from a source - observer direction should be proportional to @xmath15 where the relaxation factor @xmath16 is equal to : @xmath17 as it is shown in the next section .
it is shown here how to find the value of relaxation factor @xmath16 which was used in author s paper @xcite .
let us assume that by non - forehead collisions of a graviton with a photon , the latter leaves a photon flux detected by a remote observer ( an assumption of narrow beam of rays ) .
so as both particles have velocities @xmath18 a cross - section of interaction , which is `` visible '' under an angle @xmath19 ( see fig .
1 ) , will be equal to @xmath20 if @xmath21 is a cross - section by forehead collisions . the function @xmath22 allows to take into account both front and back hemispheres for riding gravitons .
additionally , a graviton flux , which falls on a picked out area ( cross - section ) , depends on the angle @xmath23 we have for the ratio of fluxes : @xmath24 where @xmath25 and @xmath26 are the fluxes which fall on @xmath21 under the angle @xmath19 and normally , @xmath27 is a square of side surface of a truncated cone with a base @xmath21 ( see fig .
= 12.98 cm finally , we get for the factor @xmath28 @xmath29 by @xmath30 a formed cone contains self - intersections , and it is @xmath31 .
by @xmath32 we have @xmath33 .
after computation of simple integrals , we get : @xmath34
this additional relaxation of any photonic flux due to non - forehead collisions of gravitons with photons leads in this model to the luminosity distance @xmath35 @xmath36 = 12.98 cm the model may be compared with supernova data by riess et al .
@xcite if one introduces distance moduli @xmath37 , where @xmath38 is a constant ( it is a single free parameter to fit the data ) ; @xmath39 is the luminosity distance in units of @xmath40 . in figure 2 , taken from my paper @xcite , the function @xmath41 is shown with @xmath42 to fit observations for low redshifts ; observational data are taken from table 5 of @xcite .
the predictions fit observations very well for roughly @xmath43 . given this concordance between the theory _ without any kinematics _ and observations for low redshifts
, we can think that any expansion of the universe _ is not necessary _ for higher redshifts , too .
there are discrepancies between predicted and observed values of @xmath41 for higher @xmath2
. it would be explained in the model as a result of deformation of sn spectra due to a discrete character of photon energy losses .
today , a theory of this effect does not exist , and its origin may be explained only qualitatively @xcite .
a main goal of any physical model is not to fit observational data but to understand them to have a possibility to build an adequate picture of the nature .
there are a few facts - the pioneer 10 anomaly @xcite , an existence of redshifts and sne 1a specific dimming , - which may be explained from one point of view in the considered approach .
this approach needs an existence of the graviton background with very unexpected properties . today , there is not any model in physics of particles dealing with _ an external sea of particles _ with a fixed spectrum .
our understanding of cosmology , gravitational physics and physics of particles would be essentially changed if this background really exists .
references m.a.ivanov , general relativity and gravitation , * 33 * , 479 ( 2001 ) ; erratum : * 35 * , 939 ( 2003 ) ; [ astro - ph/0005084 v2 ] .
m.a.ivanov . screening the graviton background , graviton pairing , and newtonian gravity [ gr - qc/0207006 ] . a.g .
riess et al .
type ia supernova discoveries at @xmath44 from the hubble space telescope ... , [ astro - ph/0402512 ]
( to appear in apj , 2004 ) .
ivanov m.a .
contribution to qels95 , may 21 - 26 , 1995 , baltimore , usa ; contribution to eqec96 , sept .
8 - 13 , 1996 , hamburg , germany .
another possible interpretation of sn 1a data - without kinematics : comments on the paper astro - ph/0402512 by a. riess et al .
[ astro - ph/0403130 ] .
j.d.anderson et al .
lett . , 1998 , v.81 , p. 2858 ; phys . rev .
* d65 * ( 2002 ) 082004 .
[ gr - qc/0104064 v4 ] | assumes graviton background planckian spectrum effective temperature @xmath0 flat space time energy photon decreases distance redshift @xmath2 equal to @xcite @xmath3 @xmath4 hubble constant @xmath5 average graviton energy @xmath7 stephan - boltzmann constant @xmath8 new constant necessary value constant @xmath9 gravitons super - strong interacting particles newton constant @xmath10 connected @xmath11 value @xcite @xmath12 @xmath13 additional photon flux s average energy losses @xmath14 rejection photons source - observer direction proportional to @xmath15 relaxation factor @xmath16 equal to @xmath17 shown next section find value relaxation factor @xmath16 author paper non - forehead collisions graviton photon leaves photon flux detected remote observer narrow beam both particles have velocities cross - section interaction visible angle 1 equal to @xmath20 @xmath21 cross - section forehead collisions function @xmath22 front back hemispheres riding gravitonsgraviton flux on area depends on angle @xmath23 ratio of fluxes : @xmath24 @xmath25 fluxes on @xmath21 under angle @xmath19 @xmath27 is square side surface of truncated cone base @xmath21 = 12.98 cm factor @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 cone contains self - intersections @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 relaxation of photonic flux to non - collisions leads to luminosity distance @xmath35 @xmath36 = 12.98 cm compared with supernova data by riess et al introduces distance moduli @xmath37 @xmath38 constant @xmath39 luminosity distance in units of @xmath40 figure 2 function @xmath41 with @xmath42 observations for low redshifts observational data from table 5 predictions fit observations for @xmath43 concordance theory observations low redshifts expansion universe not necessary for higher redshifts discrepancies between predicted observed values of @xmath41 for higher @xmath2 deformation of sn spectra due to photon energy lossestheory effect origin explained qualitatively goal physical model not fit observational data understand build picture nature few facts pioneer 10 anomaly redshifts sne 1a dimming explained considered approach needs graviton background unexpected properties model particles external sea particles fixed spectrum understanding cosmology gravitational physics particles changed if background exists references m.ivanov general relativity gravitation 33 , 479 ( 2001 ) 35 , 939 ( 2003 ) astro - ph/0005084 v2.ivanov screening graviton background pairing newtonian gravity gr - qc/0207006 riess et al supernova discoveries @xmath44 hubble space telescope astro - ph/0402512 apj 2004 ivanov contribution qels95 may 21 - 26 1995 baltimore usa eqec96 sept 8 - 13 1996 hamburg germany interpretation sn 1a data without kinematics comments paper astro - ph/0402512 riess et al astro - ph/0403130 j.d.anderson et al lett 1998 v.81 p. 2858 phys . rev d65 2002 ) 082004 gr - qc/0104064 v4 | 0.194441 | 1,297 | 698 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,811 | we show that integro - differential generalized langevin and non - markovian master equations can be transformed into larger sets of ordinary differential equations . on the basis of this transformation
we develop a numerical method for solving such integro - differential equations .
physically motivated example calculations are performed to demonstrate the accuracy and convergence of the method . | generalized langevin equations ( gle ) @xcite and non - markovian master equations@xcite , which arise in the treatment of systems interacting with environmental degrees of freedom , often have an integro - differential form . unlike ordinary differential equations which can be readily solved using runge - kutta , predictor - corrector and other well known numerical schemes@xcite
there are no general methods for solving equations of integro - differential type . here
we show that these integro - differential equations can be converted to ordinary - differential equations at the expense of introducing a new time variable which is treated as if it is of spatial type .
[ similar schemes are employed to numerically solve the schrdinger equation for time - dependent hamiltonians@xcite and as analytical tools@xcite .
there is also some resemblence to schemes for solving intego - differential equations of viscoelasticity@xcite . ]
we then develop a numerical method based on this exact transformation and show that it can be used to accurately solve a variety of physically motivated examples .
neglecting inhomogeneous terms resulting from noise , for simplicity , the generalized langevin equations@xcite for position @xmath0 and momentum @xmath1 of a damped oscillator in one dimension can be expressed in the form @xmath2 where @xmath3 and @xmath4 are the mass and frequency of the oscillator and @xmath5 is the memory function . defining a space - like time variable @xmath6 and a function @xmath7 it can be verified by direct substitution that @xmath1 and @xmath8 satisfy the following ordinary differential equations @xmath9 here we have introduced a differentiable damping function @xmath10 ( with @xmath11 ) which plays a useful role in the numerical scheme we will introduce to solve the ordinary differential equations ( [ gle1 ] ) , ( [ gle3 ] ) and ( [ gle4 ] ) . [ note that @xmath12 . ] neglecting inhomogeneous terms , non - markovian master equations@xcite can be written in the form @xmath13-\int_{-\infty}^tk(t , t')\rho(t')~dt ' \label{mastera}\ ] ] where @xmath14 is the time - evolving reduced density matrix of the subsystem , @xmath15 is an effective hamiltonian , and @xmath16 is a memory operator .
[ we employ units such that @xmath17 . ]
defining an operator @xmath18 it can be verified by direct substitution that @xmath14 and @xmath8 satisfy ordinary differential equations @xmath19-\chi(t,0)\label{master1}\\ d\chi(t , u)/dt&=&f(u)k(t+u , t)\rho(t)+\frac{\partial \chi(t , u)}{\partial u}\nonumber \\ & -&\frac{f'(u)}{f(u)}~\chi(t , u).\label{master2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath10 is again a differentiable damping function such that @xmath11 .
thus , the integro - differential langevin equations ( [ gle1])-([gle2 ] ) can be expressed in the ordinary differential forms ( [ gle1 ] ) and ( [ gle3])-([gle4 ] ) and the integro - differential master equation ( [ mastera ] ) can be expressed as the ordinary differential equations ( [ master1])-([master2 ] ) . to exploit these transformed equations as a practical numerical scheme we must discretize the @xmath6 variable on a grid of points so that the number of ordinary differential equations is finite . once this is achieved
the ordinary differential equations can be solved using standard techniques@xcite .
we use an eighth order runge - kutta routine@xcite in our calculations . to minimize the number of grid points we choose a damping function @xmath10 which decreases rapidly with @xmath6 . in the calculations reported here we used @xmath20 . in practice
fewer grid points are needed for positive @xmath6 than for negative @xmath6 , and we found that the points @xmath21 for @xmath22 worked well when we chose @xmath23 . here @xmath24 is the largest positive @xmath6 value . while accurate solutions can be obtained for almost any non - zero value of @xmath25 we found the most rapid convergence when values were optimized for the type of equation .
hence , @xmath25 is specified differently below for each type of equation . to complete the numerical method
we need a representation of the partial derivative with respect to @xmath6 on the grid .
this could be performed via fast fourier transform techniques@xcite .
we chose instead to employ a matrix representation @xmath26 which is known as the sinc - dvr ( discrete variable representation)@xcite . a discrete variable representation ( dvr )
is a complete set of basis functions , associated with a specific grid of points , in which functions of the variable are diagonal and derivatives have simple matrix representations@xcite .
dvrs are often used in multi - dimensional quantum mechanical scattering theory calculations@xcite . in the sinc - dvr@xcite , which is associated with an equidistantly
spaced grid on @xmath27 , partial derivatives can thus be evaluated with a sum @xmath28 for any function or operator @xmath29 . in our calculations we chose @xmath30 to equal the time interval @xmath31 between output from the runge - kutta routine . for the generalized langevin equation we chose an initial value problem ( i.e. @xmath32 for @xmath33 and @xmath34 for @xmath35 ) where @xmath36 has one of the following forms @xmath37 which are displayed graphically in figure 1 .
the solid curve is ( [ mem1 ] ) , the dashed is ( [ mem2 ] ) , the short - dashed is ( [ mem3 ] ) and the dotted is ( [ mem4 ] ) .
these memory functions were chosen to roughly represent the various functional forms which can occur physically@xcite and for ease in obtaining exact solutions .
the constants appearing in equations ( [ gle1 ] ) , ( [ gle3 ] ) and ( [ gle4 ] ) are chosen as @xmath38 and @xmath39 .
figure 2 shows the functional form of the exact solutions @xmath0 ( solid curve ) and @xmath1 ( dashed ) , which evolve from initial conditions @xmath40 and @xmath41 , for memory function ( [ mem1 ] ) over a timescale of 20 units with @xmath42 .
solutions for the other memory functions ( and the same initial conditions ) are similar in appearance .
these exact solutions were obtained by expoiting the fact that the above memory functions are sums of exponentials ( i.e. @xmath43 ) from which it follows that one may write @xmath44 for @xmath45 , and solve these ordinary differential equations using standard methods .
this approach only works for memory functions of this type .
the negative logarithm of the absolute error in @xmath0 , @xmath48 is shown in figure 3 plotted against time for the values of @xmath49 indicated in the inset .
[ the error in @xmath1 is similar . ] as @xmath49 increases @xmath50 increases ( on average ) and hence the error decreases .
the oscillations in @xmath50 are caused by periodic intersections of the two solutions . in practice
it is impossible to visually distinguish the two solutions when @xmath51 .
note that after a short transient the error ( on average ) does not increase .
this is probably a consequence of the linearity of these equations .
some decline in accuracy with time should be expected when the langevin equations are non - linear ( e.g. a particle in a double - well ) .
figure 4 compares the exact solutions for @xmath0 ( solid curve ) and @xmath1 ( short - dashed ) with those obtained using our method for @xmath52 ( dashed and dotted , respectively ) over a time of 40 units .
no disagreement is visible .
convergence for memory function ( [ mem2 ] ) is similar .
memory functions ( [ mem3 ] ) and ( [ mem4 ] ) which take negative values and have long time tails require many grid points for convergence .
figure 5 shows the negative logarithm ( base ten ) of the absolute error in @xmath0 for this case .
while many grid points are required , high accuracy solutions can clearly be obtained using our method . for the master equation we chose an initial value problem consisting of a dissipative two - level system representing a spin interacting with environmental degrees of freedom .
if the spin hamiltonian is @xmath53 and the coupling to the environment is proportional to @xmath54 then the equation for the density matrix @xmath14 is of the form@xcite @xmath55\nonumber \\ & & -c\int_0^t w(t - t')\{\sigma_x^2\rho(t')+\rho(t')\sigma_x^2 - 2\sigma_x\rho(t')\sigma_x\}~dt'\nonumber\\ & & ~~~~\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the sigmas denote pauli matrices .
parameters were set as @xmath56 and @xmath57 .
we chose to define @xmath58 which differs somewhat from the general definition employed in ( [ smo ] ) .
the transformed equations are then @xmath59 - 2c\{\chi(t,0)\nonumber \\ &
-&\sigma_x\chi(t,0)\sigma_x\ } \label{stu1}\\ \frac{d\chi(t , u)}{dt}&=&e^{-gu^2}w(u)\rho(t)+\frac{\partial \chi(t , u)}{\partial u}\nonumber \\ & + & 2 g u~\chi(t , u)\label{stu2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] theory predicts that the memory function @xmath36 for this problem is approximately gaussian in form@xcite .
however , we were unable to obtain an exact solution of the master equation for this case@xcite
. instead we approximate the gaussian via the similar function @xmath60 .
exact solutions for @xmath61 and initial conditions @xmath62 and @xmath63 were obtained in the same way as for the generalized langevin equations and are plotted vs time in figure 6 . for the approximate method we used @xmath64
^ 2 $ ] and for negative @xmath6 we set @xmath47 . from figure 7 where we plot @xmath65 against time
we see that convergence of the numerical method is very rapid for these equations .
[ similar accuracies are achieved for @xmath66 and @xmath67 . ]
thus , we have shown that accurate solutions of integro - differential equations can be obtained via transformation to a larger set of ordinary differential equations . because this transformation is exact
we expect that the method will also work for equations not considered in this manuscript .
it should be possible to obtain accurate solutions for such equations via the following steps .
first find an approximation of the memory function or operator which will allow exact solutions to be obtained .
optimize the numerical method by finding the best @xmath25 for the model equations .
finally , apply the numerical method to the original equations and look for convergence of the solutions with increasing @xmath49 . | langevin equations non - markovian master equations systems environmental freedom have integro - differential form unlike ordinary differential equations solved using runge - kutta predictor - corrector no general methods for solving equations integro - differential type differential equations converted to ordinary - differential equations introducing new time variable spatial type similar schemes solve schrdinger equation for time - dependent hamiltonians analytical tools resemblence to solving intego - differential equations of viscoelasticity develop numerical method based on transformation solve physically motivated examples neglecting terms generalized langevin equations for position momentum of damped oscillator expressed in form @xmath2 are mass frequency of oscillator memory function defining space - like time variable @xmath6 function @xmath7 verified by direct substitution @xmath1 @xmath8 satisfy ordinary differential equations introduced differentiable damping function @xmath10 with @xmath11 useful role in numerical scheme solve ordinary differential equations ( gle1 gle3 gle4 @xmath12 neglecting inhomogeneous terms non - markovian master equations@xcite written form @xmath13-\int\infty}^tk(t\rho(t~dt{mastera @xmath14 time - evolving reduced density matrix subsystem @xmath15 effective hamiltonian @xmath16 memory operator employ units @xmath17 defining operator @xmath18 verified direct substitution @xmath14 @xmath8 satisfy ordinary differential equations @xmath19-\chi(t,0){master1}\\\chi(t u)/dt=&f(u)k(t+u)\rho(t)+\frac\partial \chi(t{master2}{aligned @xmath10 differentiable damping function @xmath11 integro - differential langevin equations gle1]-[gle2 expressed ordinary differential forms integro - differential master equation mastera ordinary differential equations exploit transformed equations discretize @xmath6 variable grid points number ordinary differential equations finite equations solved using standard techniques@xcite use eighth order runge - kutta routine@xcite calculationsminimize grid points choose damping function @xmath10 decreases with @xmath6 calculations used @xmath20 fewer grid points needed positive @xmath6 negative @xmath6 points @xmath21 @xmath22 worked @xmath23 @xmath24 largest positive @xmath6 value accurate solutions non - zero value @xmath25 rapid convergence optimized type equation @xmath25 specified differently each type equation numerical method need representation partial derivative @xmath6 grid fast fourier transform techniques matrix representation @xmath26 sinc - dvr discrete variable representation complete basis functions specific grid points functions diagonal derivatives simple matrix representations used multi - dimensional quantum mechanical scattering theory calculations equidistantly spaced grid @xmath27 partial derivatives evaluated with sum @xmath28 for any function operator @xmath29 chose @xmath30 equal time interval @xmath31 output runge - kutta routine generalized langevin equation chose initial value problem @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 for @xmath35 @xmath36 has forms @xmath37 displayed figure 1 solid curve [ mem1 ] dashed mem2 short - dashed mem3 dotted [ mem4 ] memory functions represent functional forms ease obtaining exact solutions constants in equations [ gle1 gle3 [ gle4 ] @xmath38 @xmath39 figure 2 shows functional form solutions @xmath0 solid curve @xmath1 dashed from initial conditions @xmath40 @xmath41 memory function mem1 over timescale 20 units with @xmath42 solutions other memory functions similar exact solutions obtained memory functions sums of exponentials @xmath43 ) write @xmath44 for @xmath45 solve ordinary differential equations using standard methods approach works for memory functions negative logarithm absolute error in @xmath0 @xmath48 shown figure 3 plotted against time for values @xmath49 error in @xmath1 similar @xmath49 increases @xmath50 increases error decreases oscillations in @xmath50 caused by intersections solutions impossible to visually distinguish solutions when @xmath51 after short transient error increase consequence linearity equations decline in accuracy with time expected when langevin equations non - linear particle double - wellfigure 4 compares solutions @xmath0 solid curve @xmath1 short - dashed with method @xmath52 dashed dotted over 40 units no disagreement convergence memory function mem2 ] similar memory functions mem3 mem4 negative values long time tails require many grid points convergence figure 5 shows negative logarithm error in @xmath0 many grid points required high accuracy solutions obtained using our method master equation chose initial value problem dissipative two - level system spin interacting with environmental degrees freedom if spin hamiltonian @xmath53 coupling environment proportional to @xmath54 equation for density matrix @xmath14 form @xmath55 sigmas denote pauli matrices parameters set as @xmath56 @xmath57 define @xmath58 differs from general definition ( [ smo ] )transformed equations are @xmath59 - 2c\\chi(t,0)\nonumber\sigma_x\label{stu1}\\{d\chi(t , u)}{dt}^{-gu^2}w(u\rho(t+\partial \chi(t u\nonumber 2 g u~\chi(t u{stu2}{aligned theory predicts memory function @xmath36 gaussian in form@xcite exact solution master equation approximate gaussian via function @xmath60 solutions for @xmath61 conditions @xmath62 @xmath63 obtained plotted vs time in figure 6 approximate method used @xmath64 ^ 2 $ negative @xmath6 set @xmath47 figure 7 @xmath65 convergence numerical method rapid for equations similar accuracies for @xmath66 and @xmath67 accurate solutions of integro - differential equations via transformation to ordinary differential equations transformation method for equations not considered in manuscript obtain accurate solutions find approximation of memory function exact solutions optimize numerical method best @xmath25 for model equationsapply numerical method original equations convergence solutions increasing @xmath49 | 0.441413 | 2,448 | 1,238 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,812 | * supernova 2006gy in the galaxy ngc 1260 is the most luminous one recorded @xcite .
its progenitor might have been a very massive ( @xmath0 ) star @xcite , but that is incompatible with hydrogen in the spectrum of the supernova , because stars @xmath1 are believed to have shed their hydrogen envelopes several hundred thousand years before the explosion .
alternatively , the progenitor might have arisen from the merger of two massive stars @xcite . here
we show that the collision frequency of massive stars in a dense and young cluster ( of the kind to be expected near the center of a galaxy ) is sufficient to provide a reasonable chance that sn 2006gy resulted from such a bombardment .
if this is the correct explanation , then we predict that when the supernova fades ( in a year or so ) a dense cluster of massive stars becomes visible at the site of the explosion .
* # 1*[#1 ed ] * # 1*[#1 ed ] * # 1*[#1 simon ] * # 1*[#1 simon ] * the presence of hydrogen in supernova sn2006gy is hard to reconcile with the explosion of a @xmath2 star , as such a star loses its hydrogen - rich envelope several hundreds of thousands of years before the star explodes .
also the location of the supernova , at a projected distance of about 1
( @xmath3pc ) from the nucleus of the host galaxy ngc1260 is remarkable .
a merger between a very massive ( @xmath0 ) hydrogen - depleted star that already had a core in an advanced phase of helium burning , with a hydrogen rich main - sequence star of 10 to 40 , @xmath4 to @xmath5 years prior to the supernova explosion may explain the unusual brightness of the supernova , the presence of the hydrogen in the interstellar medium surrounding the supernova and the presence of hydrogen in the supernova itself @xcite .
the existence of young star clusters which are in a state of dynamical core collapse is crucial for the proposed scenario . during core collapse and the subsequent post - core collapse evolution of the star cluster
a runaway collision product can grow , and even though the star is likely to be much more extended than usual , subsequent bombardment will result in a net increase in mass @xcite .
eventually the massive star is expected to prostrate to a black hole of intermediate mass @xcite .
the supernova in which the black hole forms is likely to be unusually bright with some hydrogen in its envelope left - over from the last collision .
the inner few hundred parsec around the center of the milky way is populated with several bright and dense star clusters , of which the arches cluster @xcite and quintuplet @xcite are the most well known , but many others exist .
the proximity of the galactic center and the depth of the potential well of the bulge causes these clusters to be denser than elsewhere in the galaxy @xcite .
the sb / sb0 host galaxy ngc 1260 appears rather ordinary , though the presence of a dust lane and of hii emission near its center suggests that a recent burst of star formation occurred near its center @xcite .
we estimate , taking an intergalactic extinction of @xmath6mag @xcite into account , that within the observed isophotal magnitude @xmath7 ( @xmath8kpc ) @xcite and adopting @xmath9 @xcite , ngc1260 has a mass of @xmath10 . assuming that the mass enclosed within a radius @xmath11 from the center of ngc1260 is , like in the milky way @xcite described with @xmath12 , but for ngc1260 @xmath13 .
we can then calculate the lower limit to the tidal radius @xcite for a cluster of mass @xmath14 in a circular orbit at distance @xmath11 from the center of ngc1260 .
star clusters that experience core collapse before the most massive stars have left the main sequence can grow a supermassive star via collision runaway .
the mass which can then grow within @xmath15myr can be estimated using eq.2 of @xcite . here
we have to make some assumption about the stellar mass function in the cluster , but for clarity adopting a mean mass of @xmath16 is sufficient without detailed knowledge of the exact shape of the initial mass function . for a reasonable range of cluster densities and distances from the center of ngc 1260 we can now calculate the mass that can be grown in the cluster in @xmath15myr . in fig.[fig :
mrunaway ] we present the results of our calculations using a king @xcite model with a depth of the central potential expressed in the dimension - less parameter @xmath17 , which can produce at most a @xmath18 star in a collision runaway . for shallower as well as for more concentrated king models the maximum mass for the supermassive star decreases , as well as the mass of the cluster that produces such stars .
the last collision before the supernova , must have occurred with a relatively unevolved main - sequence star , and deposited large quantities of hydrogen on the surface of the collision product . by the time of the supernova
not all surface hydrogen of the last collision was blown away , as about one of hydrogen was observed in the supernova @xcite .
the remainder of the hydrogen deposited on the stellar surface during the last collision was found in the interstellar medium surrounding the supernova , and exceeds some 0.55 @xcite but could be as high as 2030 @xcite .
this mass may have come from the strong stellar wind in the last few @xmath19 years before the supernova , blowing away the hydrogen which was deposited to the stellar surface during the collision . a tentative upper limit for the rate of mass loss of the progenitor star is @xmath20/yr to @xmath21/yr @xcite .
these observed mass loss rates are consistent with those of detailed evolutionary calculations of stars of 500@xmath22 @xcite . at this mass loss rate
it takes roughly @xmath23 to @xmath24 years to blow 20 in the form of a stellar wind from the surface of the supermassive star .
this time scale is of the same order as our estimated average time between collisions of @xmath25 years ( see fig.[fig : mrunaway ] ) .
the luminosity of the supernova explosion in collapsar models is driven by the angular momentum transfer from the critically rotating black hole to its surrounding torus . the available energy reservoir , and thus the supernova brightness ,
would then be proportional to the mass of the black hole @xcite .
the observed brightness of sn2006gy would then be consistent with the collapse of an unusually massive star , and the consequent formation of a rather massive ( @xmath26 ) black hole .
we are unaware of detailed simulations of such an unusual supernova to bolster our arguments , but the consequences for the supernova seem to be profound and we encourage further research in this direction . the amount of hydrogen in the pre - supernova stellar envelope , the amount of hydrogen in the interstellar medium , the mass - loss rate of the supernova progenitor derived from the observations and the enormous brightness of the supernova , bracket the values we derive based on the collision runaway scenario . we therefore conclude that a collision of a @xmath27 main - sequence star with a supermassive star @xmath28 years before the supernova could conveniently explain the range of oddities surrounding sn2006gy .
we predict that a young ( @xmath29myr ) , dense and massive ( @xmath30 ) star cluster is present at the location of the supernova . at this moment
the star cluster can not be seen , but adopting a mass - to - ligh ratio of @xmath31 , which is consistent with the starburst99 @xcite models for a @xmath29myr old stellar population , the cluster should become noticeable as soon as the supernova fades below an absolute magnitude of about -8.2 mag for @xmath32 and -5.7mag , for a @xmath19 star cluster .
the environment in which the collision runaway can be initiated is rather exotic , as the cluster has to be sufficiently massive and dense to warrant dynamical core collapse within a few myr . in star clusters
sufficiently massive to grow a massive collision product there are typically between 60 and 600 stars @xmath33 , and consequently only one out of 60600 type ib / c or type ii supernovae in these clusters will be of this peculiar bright type , like sn2006gy .
if in a nuclear or a normal starburst ten per cent of all stars are formed in sufficiently dense clusters , one would expect that about one out of 600 - 6,000 supernovae to be of this type . ./journals_nature.def 10 , r.
, 11 ( 2006 ) . , a. _ et al . _ .
, 11 ( 2006 ) . , j. l. , garnavich , p. , chronister , a. & connick , p. . ,
11 ( 2006 ) .
, r. j. _ et al . _ .
, 11 ( 2006 ) .
, n. _ et al . _ . ( 2006 ) . , g. & maeder , a. . , 581598 ( 2005 ) . , e. o. _ et al . _ . , l13l16 ( 2007 ) . , s. f. , makino , j. , mcmillan , s. l. w. & hut , p. .
, 117126 ( 1999 ) . , t. k. _ et al . _ .
( 2007 ) .
, c. l. & kalogera , v. theoretical black hole mass distributions .
, 548560 ( 2001 ) . , s. f. , baumgardt , h. , hut , p. , makino , j. & mcmillan , s. l. w. . ,
724726 ( 2004 ) . , a. s. _ et al . _ .
, 750761 ( 1996 ) .
, a. s. _ et al . _ . in _ bulletin of the american astronomical society _
, 12621263 , ( 1992 ) . ,
c. m. & bica , e. `` new star clusters projected close to the galactic centre '' .
, l9l12 ( 2000 ) . , c. m. _ et al . _ . , 127134 ( 2003 ) .
, j. p. , paumard , t. , stolovy , s. r. & rigaut , f. .
, 155167 ( 2004 ) . , s. f. _ et al . _ .
, 319326 ( 2006 ) . , j. & meusinger , h. .
, 141161 ( 1999 ) . , g. _ et al . _ . , 22682280 ( 2003 ) . ,
p. , ashman , k. m. & persic , m. .
, 8993 ( 1991 ) . , r. h. & lowinger , t. .
, 292297 ( 1972 ) . , j. & tremaine , s. .
princeton , nj , princeton university press , pp.747 , ( 1987 ) .
, s. f. & mcmillan , s. l. w. .
, 899907 ( 2002 ) . , m. a. , freitag , m. & rasio , f. a. .
, 632652 ( 2004 ) . , m. , grkan , m. a. & rasio , f. a. . , 141161 ( 2006 ) . , i. r. the structure of star clusters .
iii . some simple dvriamical models .
, 6475 ( 1966 ) .
, l. r. .
( 2006 ) .
, l. r. , van den heuvel , e. , vinck , j. , portegies zwart , s. & de kooter , a. .
( 2007 ) . , h. k. , wijers , r. a. m. j. & brown , g. e. , 83114 ( 2000 ) . , c. _ et al . _ . , 340 ( 1999 ) | this work was supported by nwo under grant no . 643.200.503 , the netherlands research school for astronomomy ( nova ) and the national science foundation under grant no .
phy 05 - 51164 to the kavli institute for theoretical physics in santa barbara . | supported nwo grant 643.200.503 netherlands research school national science foundation grant 05 - 51164 kavli institute theoretical physics santa barbara | 0.066187 | 60 | 33 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,818 | photometric calibration to @xmath0 accuracy is frequently needed at arbitrary celestial locations ; however , existing all - sky astronomical catalogs do not reach this accuracy and time consuming photometric calibration procedures are required .
i fit the hipparcos @xmath1 , and @xmath2 magnitudes , along with the 2mass @xmath3 , @xmath4 , and @xmath5 magnitudes of tycho-2 catalog - stars with stellar spectral templates . from the best fit spectral template derived for each star ,
i calculate the synthetic sdss @xmath6 magnitudes and constructed an all - sky catalog of @xmath6 magnitudes for bright stars ( @xmath7 ) . testing this method on sdss photometric telescope observations ,
i find that the photometric accuracy , for a single star , is usually about @xmath8 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 and @xmath10mag ( 1@xmath11 ) , for the @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 , and @xmath15-bands , respectively .
however , by using @xmath16 such stars , the typical errors per calibrated field ( systematic + statistical ) can be reduced to about 0.04 , 0.03 , 0.02 , and 0.02mag , in the @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 , and @xmath15-bands , respectively .
therefore , in cases for which several calibration stars can be observed in the field of view of an instrument , accurate photometric calibration is possible . | often in astronomical research , absolute photometric accuracy better than @xmath17 , is required . in many cases ,
the method of choice is to observe photometric standards ( e.g. , landolt 1992 ) .
however , this requires photometric observing conditions , and additional observations . the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ; york et al .
2000 ) provides an excellent photometric calibration in @xmath18 bands , with accuracy better than @xmath19 ( adelman - mccarthy et al .
2008 ) . however , this is available only for about a quarter of the sky .
other all - sky visible - light catalogue , like the usno - b1 ( monet et al .
2003 ) and the us naval observatory ccd astrograph catalogue ( zacharias et al .
2004 ) provide relatively poor photometric accuracy .
the magnitudes of individual stars in these catalogue are accurate to about @xmath20mag , and even with a large number of stars there is still a considerable field - to - field systematic errors . in this paper ,
i calculate the sdss @xmath6 magnitudes of tycho-2 stars over the entire sky . in case @xmath21 of these stars
are visible in a camera field of view , these stars can be used to photometrically calibrate an astronomical image to accuracy of better than @xmath22mag .
the only overhead is that typically a shorter exposure in which the tycho-2 catalog stars will not be saturated is required .
from the tycho-2 catalog ( hog et al . 2000 ) , i selected all stars with @xmath23 mag and @xmath24 mag . this choice was made in order to remove stars with magnitude uncertainties @xmath25 mag .
i cross correlated this list with the 2mass catalog ( skrutskie et al .
2006 ) , and selected only stars which have a single 2mass match within @xmath26 .
the final list contains 1,560,980 stars .
next , i fitted the tycho-2/2mass magnitudes of these stars with synthetic photometry , in the @xmath27 bands , of 131 stellar spectral templates ( pickles 1998 ) .
the synthetic photometry was calculated using the code of poznanski et al .
( 2002 ) . for each star i preformed two types of fits : ( i ) a @xmath28 fit ; ( ii ) a least square , of residuals ,
fit ignoring the tycho-2 and 2mass photometric errors .
i note that the spectral templates were not corrected for galactic extinction .
a table listing the 1.56 million stars , along with their coordinates , observed @xmath27 magnitudes , fitted @xmath6 magnitudes for both kinds of fits , and corresponding root - mean - square ( rms ) and @xmath28 , is available in the electronic version of this paper , and via the vizier service . in table
[ tab - catdesc ] i describe the content of this table .
the third column in the catalog is a flag indicating if the star is recommended for use as a standard star ( i.e. , flag@xmath29 ) .
these stars satisfy all of the following criteria : @xmath30mag and @xmath31mag and @xmath32mag ; error(@xmath1)@xmath33mag ; error(@xmath2)@xmath33mag ; and rms of the best rms - fit template smaller than 0.15mag .
there are 992,235 stars with flag@xmath29 .
lll 1 & right ascension j2000.0 & deg + 2 & declination j2000.0 & deg + 3 & flag for good standards & + 4 & @xmath1 magnitude & mag + 5 & @xmath1 magnitude error & mag + 6 & @xmath2 magnitude & mag + 7 & @xmath2 magnitude error & mag + 8 & @xmath3 magnitude & mag + 9 & @xmath3 magnitude error & mag + 10 & @xmath4 magnitude & mag + 11 & @xmath4 magnitude error & mag + 12 & @xmath5 magnitude & mag + 13 & @xmath5 magnitude error & mag + 14 & best rms - fit template & + 15 & rms for the best rms - fit template & mag + 16 & rms - fit @xmath12-band magnitude & mag + 17 & rms - fit @xmath13-band magnitude & mag + 18 & rms - fit @xmath14-band magnitude & mag + 19 & rms - fit @xmath15-band magnitude & mag + 20 & best @xmath28-fit template & + 21 & @xmath28 for the best @xmath28-fit template ( d.o.f.=4 ) & + 22 & @xmath28-fit @xmath12-band magnitude & + 23 & @xmath28-fit @xmath13-band magnitude & + 24 & @xmath28-fit @xmath14-band magnitude & + 25 & @xmath28-fit @xmath15-band magnitude & [ tab - catdesc ] the constructed catalog star density as a function of galactic latitude is shown in fig .
[ fig : tyc2_starden ] .
( i.e. , good for photometric calibration ) .
[ fig : tyc2_starden],width=321 ] for flag@xmath29 stars , the sky density ranges from 55deg@xmath34 at the galactic plane to about 10deg@xmath34 at the galactic poles .
in order to test the accuracy of the derived synthetic magnitudes , i constructed a catalog of all the photometric measurements available from the sdss photometric telescope `` secondary patches '' fields ( tucker et al .
2006 ) . from this catalog i selected all the non - saturated stars brighter than 12th magnitude in both the @xmath12- and @xmath13-bands .
davenport et al .
( 2007 ) analyzed the systematic offset between the sdss magnitude system and the sdss photometric telescope bands .
they found that the magnitudes of very red stars are different in the two systems . using the transformations given by davenport et al .
( 2007 ) i converted all the sdss photometric - telescope magnitudes to the sdss system .
next i cross - correlated this list with the catalog of @xmath6 synthetic magnitudes presented in [ cat ] , and selected stars which have @xmath35 magnitudes fainter than 6 ( i.e. , not saturated ) ; @xmath1 and @xmath2 magnitude errors smaller than 0.15 ; and rms of the best rms - fit template of less than 0.15mag . for each of the 3714 stars satisfying these criteria , i compared the corrected magnitudes ( i.e. , davenport et al . 2007 ) as measured by the sdss photometric telescope with its best - fit synthetic magnitude . in figure
[ fig : mag_sdss_vs_fit ] , i show histograms of the fitted synthetic magnitudes minus the sdss magnitudes for the @xmath6-bands . the median value , along with half the range containing @xmath36 of the stars , are indicated in each panel .
the upper row is for the best - fit magnitude by minimizing the rms , while the lower row is for the @xmath28 fit .
this plot suggests that the @xmath28 fit is marginally better .
therefore , it should be preferred over the rms - fit . in all the bands
there are small offsets , listed in fig .
[ fig : mag_sdss_vs_fit ] , between the sdss photometric telescope magnitudes and the derived synthetic magnitudes .
the magnitudes in the catalog ( table [ tab - catdesc ] ) are corrected for these small offsets .
i note that i repeated this test using 42 sdss photometric standardsdtucker / ugriz / tab08.dat ] ( smith et al .
2002 ) , and found similar results .
the field of view of large format cameras may contain only several suitable tycho-2 stars ( see fig .
[ fig : tyc2_starden ] ) . to estimate the uncertainty in magnitude calibration when using several stars ,
i have carried out the following simulations : i randomly selected @xmath37 stars , for any @xmath37 between 2 and 100 , out of the 3714 sdss standard stars that i used for the comparison of the derived magnitudes with the actual sdss magnitudes .
for each set of randomly selected @xmath37 stars i calculated the median of differences between the @xmath28-fitted synthetic magnitudes and the sdss magnitudes .
next , i repeated this procedure 10,000 times ( for each @xmath37 ) , and calculated the standard deviation of the 10,000 median of differences . in figure
[ fig : error_vs_nstars ] i show the standard deviation of the distribution of the median of differences between the synthetic magnitudes and the measured sdss magnitudes , as a function of @xmath37 .
the plot suggests that , for example , by using five stars the errors in photometry reduce to 0.07mag , 0.04mag , 0.03mag and 0.03mag in the @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 and @xmath15-bands , respectively .
when using ten stars the errors reduce to about 0.04mag , 0.03mag , 0.02mag and 0.02mag in the @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 and @xmath15-bands , respectively . in order to remove outliers
it is important to use the median of differences ( i.e. , and not mean of differences ) . to summarize , i suggest an alternative method for photometric calibration that may work to accuracy of about several percents .
this method relies on selected stars in the tycho-2 catalog for which i fitted spectral templates to their @xmath27 magnitudes .
two major limitation of this method is that several tycho-2 stars are needed in the field of view , and that shorter exposures , in which these stars are not saturated , are required . given the catalog star density as a function of galactic latitude ( fig .
[ fig : tyc2_starden ] ) , this method is applicable for instruments with large field of view or for low galactic latitude observations .
i would like to thank the referee for constructive comments .
i thank shri kulkarni for expressing the need for an all - sky catalog of standard stars , and to avishay gal - yam , dovi poznanski , orly gnat , and andrew pickles for valuable discussions .
this work is supported in part by grants from nsf and nasa . | in astronomical research photometric accuracy better than @xmath17 required observe photometric standards landolt 1992 requires photometric observing conditions additional observations sloan digital sky survey provides excellent photometric calibration in @xmath18 bands accuracy better than @xmath19 available for a quarter of sky all - sky catalogue usno - b1 us naval observatory ccd astrograph catalogue provide poor photometric accuracy magnitudes stars accurate to about @xmath20mag considerable field - to - field systematic errors paper calculate sdss @xmath6 magnitudes of tycho-2 stars over entire sky @xmath21 stars visible in can to photometrically calibrate image to accuracy better than @xmath22mag shorter exposure tycho-2 catalog stars not saturated required from tycho-2 catalog selected all stars with @xmath23 mag and @xmath24 mag to remove stars with magnitude uncertainties @xmath25 mag cross correlated list with 2mass catalog selected only stars single 2mass match within @xmath26 final list contains 1,560,980 starsfitted tycho-2/2mass magnitudes stars with synthetic photometry @xmath27 bands 131 stellar spectral templates pickles 1998 ) synthetic photometry calculated code poznanski et al . 2002 star preformed two fits @xmath28 fit least square ignoring tycho-2 2mass photometric errors spectral templates not corrected for galactic extinction table listing 1.56 million stars coordinates observed @xmath27 magnitudes @xmath6 magnitudes root - mean - @xmath28 available electronic version vizier service table third column flag star standard star flag@xmath29 stars satisfy criteria : @xmath30mag @xmath31mag @xmath32mag error(@xmath1)@xmath33mag error(@xmath2)@xmath33mag rms best rms - fit template smaller than 0.15mag 992,235 stars with flag@xmath291 ascension j2000.0 deg + 2 declination j2000.0 deg + 3 flag standards + 4 @xmath1 magnitude mag + 5 error mag + 6 @xmath2 magnitude mag + 7 error mag + 8 @xmath3 magnitude mag + 9 error mag + 10 magnitude mag + 11 error mag + 12 @xmath5 magnitude mag + 13 error mag + 14 rms - fit template + 15 fit template mag + 16 @xmath12-band magnitude mag + 17 @xmath13-band magnitude mag + 18-band magnitude mag + 19 @xmath15-band magnitude mag + 20 @xmath28-fit template + 21-fit template d.o.f.=4 ) + 22-fit-band magnitude + 23-band magnitude + 24-band magnitude + 25-band magnitude constructed catalog star density function galactic latitude tyc2_starden photometric calibration flag@xmath29 stars sky density ranges 55deg@xmath34 galactic plane to 10deg@xmath34 galactic polestest accuracy synthetic magnitudes constructed catalog photometric measurements sdss photometric telescope secondary tucker et 2006 selected non - saturated stars brighter than 12th magnitude in @xmath12- and @xmath13-bands davenport et al . 2007 analyzed sdss magnitude system sdss photometric telescope bands magnitudes of very red stars different converted sdss photometric telescope magnitudes to sdss system cross - correlated list with catalog @xmath6 synthetic magnitudes selected stars @xmath35 magnitudes fainter than 6 not saturated @xmath1 and @xmath2 magnitude errors smaller than 0.15 rms of best rms - fit template less than 0.15mag 3714 stars compared corrected magnitudes with best - fit synthetic magnitude figure_sdss_vs_fit histograms fitted synthetic magnitudes minus sdss magnitudes for @xmath6-bands median value half range containing @xmath36 indicated in each panel upper row for best - fit magnitude lower row for @xmath28 fit @xmath28 fit marginally better preferred over rms - fitbands small offsets listed in fig . mag_sdss_vs_fit between sdss photometric telescope magnitudes derived synthetic magnitudes magnitudes in catalog corrected for offsets repeated test using 42 sdss photometric standardsdtucker found similar results field of view of large format cameras contain several suitable tycho-2 stars fig . tyc2_starden estimate uncertainty in magnitude calibration using several stars carried simulations randomly selected @xmath37 stars 2 100 out of 3714 sdss standard stars for comparison calculated median of differences between synthetic magnitudes sdss magnitudes repeated procedure 10,000 times calculated standard deviation of 10,000 median differences figure error_vs_nstars standard deviation distribution median differences between synthetic magnitudes measured sdss magnitudes function of @xmath37 plot suggests using five stars errors in photometry reduce to 0.07mag 0.04mag 0.03mag 0.03mag in @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15-bandsusing ten stars errors reduce to 0.04mag 0.03mag 0.02mag 0.02mag in @xmath12-bands to remove outliers important to use median of differences not mean suggest alternative method for photometric calibration accuracy several percents method relies on selected stars in tycho-2 catalog fitted spectral templates to @xmath27 magnitudes limitation several tycho-2 stars needed shorter exposures required catalog star density function of galactic latitude method applicable for large field of view or low galactic latitude observations thank referee for comments shri kulkarni all - sky catalog of standard stars avishay gal - yam dovi poznanski orly gnat andrew pickles for discussions work supported by grants from nsf nasa | 0.353548 | 2,345 | 1,222 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,820 | we analyze the model of gamma - ray binaries , consisting of a massive star and a pulsar with ultrarelativistic wind .
we consider radiation from energetic particles , accelerated at the pulsar wind termination shock , and feedback of this radiation on the wind through production of secondary electron - positron pairs . we show that the pair feedback limits the lorentz factor of the pulsar wind and creates a population of very energetic pairs , whose radiation may be responsible for the observed gamma - ray signal .
address = institute of applied physics ras , 46 ulyanov st , 603950 nizhny novgorod , russia , altaddress = lobachevsky state university of nizhni novgorod , 23 gagarin av , 603950 nizhny novgorod , russia address = school of cosmic physics , dublin institute for advanced studies , 31 fitzwilliam place dublin 2 , ireland , altaddress = max planck institute fr kernphysik , saupfercheckweg 1 , d-69117 heidelberg , germany | binary systems consisting of a massive star and a compact object are known to be sources of high - energy gamma - rays .
the nature of compact objects in these systems is not exactly known ; there are models , which either assume they are black holes ( e.g. , @xcite ) or pulsars ( e.g. , @xcite ) . in the present paper , we consider gamma - ray binaries with pulsars , where one naturally expects collision of stellar wind with ultrarelativistic pulsar wind . in all such models ,
the pulsar wind is assumed to be the source of observed gamma - rays through inverse compton scattering of stellar photons either directly , by electrons moving with extreme bulk lorentz factor @xmath0 ( e.g. , @xcite ) , or from the wind termination shock , where electrons are accelerated well beyond their initial ( bulk ) lorentz factor @xmath1 ( e.g. , @xcite ) .
a system , where there is a dense radiation field ( here stellar photons ) and an ultrarelativistic plasma flow ( here the pulsar wind ) can launch a runaway - like particle acceleration ( converter acceleration ) , as been already discussed in application to gamma - ray bursts and active galactic nuclei ( @xcite ) . in gamma - ray binaries the feedback from downstream of the pulsar wind to its upstream
is realized through two - photon pair production .
below we show that it is possible to construct a model , which can reproduce main observed properties of gamma - ray binaries without involving any physical processes apart from the two - photon pair production feedback itself and consequent cooling of the energetic pairs through synchrotron and inverse compton radiation . obviously , the physics of gamma - ray binaries is much more complex than this simple model , but our model demonstrates that the pair feedback and subsequent converter acceleration has to be included as an essential , if not the most important , component in any advanced model for gamma - ray binaries with pulsar winds .
for our model , we assume the following setup ( base on the parameters of ls 5039 and ls i + 61 303 , which can be considered to be typical representatives of gamma - ray binary population ) .
the massive star has the luminosity @xmath2 erg / s and the mass - loss rate @xmath3/yr . the mass outflow is due to stellar wind with velocity @xmath4 .
the pulsar orbits the massive star at the distance @xmath5 cm and produces a magnetized ultrarelativistic wind with power @xmath6 erg / s ) , which consists of electron - positron pairs and has the lorentz factor @xmath7 ( we will show later that @xmath8 ) and magnetization parameter @xmath9 . the pulsar wind termination shock is located at the distance @xmath10 from the pulsar , where the dynamical pressures of the two winds are equal . at this distance , the energy density in the pulsar wind is @xmath11 , what constitutes a fraction @xmath12 of the energy density of the background thermal photons supplied by the massive star , @xmath13 .
thus , neither comptonization of stellar radiation nor the synchrotron and self - compton radiation is an a priori dominant emission mechanism .
the shock - bounded pulsar wind region is filled with stellar photons and the high - energy radiation produced at the termination shock , which forms ( inside the shock ) an isotropic and uniform photon field . interacting with each other , these photons occasionally produce electron - positron pairs , which are picked up by the pulsar wind , becoming much more energetic , and then lose energy for radiation on their way to the shock and , to a greater extent , after crossing the shock and entering the shocked plasma .
the rate of secondary pair production @xmath14 does not depend on the angular distribution of the parent photons as soon as at least one of the interacting photon fields is isotropic ( the shock - generated photons are always isotropic ) , and the velocities of secondary pairs are uncorrelated with the wind velocity . when pairs with such velocity distribution are picked up by the pulsar wind , their energy increases on average by the factor @xmath15 .
energetic secondary electrons and positrons readily cool : a fraction of their energy is radiated before they reach the termination shock , the rest is radiated in the post - shock region . the cooling is more efficient in the post - shock region both because the particles spend more time there and because synchrotron emission is possible in the shocked plasma in addition to inverse compton emission .
the synchrotron emission from secondary pairs supplies additional low - energy target photons for production of new pairs , forming a feedback loop .
the overall contribution of this feedback to the radiative efficiency of the shocked pulsar wind can be estimated as @xmath16 where @xmath17 is the average total energy of a secondary pair at the moment of birth .
should the pulsar wind become heavily loaded with secondary pairs , its lorentz factor decreases to the value , which ensures the feedback efficiency @xmath18 is less than unity .
consider two isotropic populations of photons with energies around @xmath19 and @xmath20 ( @xmath21 for definiteness ) , and energy densities @xmath22 and @xmath23 .
the pair production rate approximately equals @xmath24 where @xmath25 @xmath26 is the angle - averaged pair production cross - section , @xmath27 and @xmath28 are the energy densities in two populations of interacting photons in units of the background stellar radiation energy density . with increase of @xmath19 ,
the optimal energy of target photons @xmath29 decreases and , for a given radiation energy density , the number of target photons ( hence opacity ) goes up .
so , all other things being equal , the larger is @xmath19 ( which determines the energy of electron - positron pair at birth , @xmath17 ) , the larger is the feedback efficiency .
even though the feedback may be controlled by inverse compton radiation of primary pairs , the overall radiated power is mainly due to secondary pairs , which have energies @xmath30 and upscatter stellar photons inefficiently because of the klein - nishina suppression in the scattering cross - section .
their main energy - loss channel is synchrotron radiation in the post - shock region , where secondary pairs form the cooling distribution and their synchrotron spectrum has the photon index -3/2 .
it extends in energy up to @xmath31 where @xmath32 the magnetic field strength in the post - shock region .
when the pair feedback starts to develop , secondary pairs are born in interaction of comptonized stellar photons ( produced by the primary electrons ) with energy density @xmath33 where @xmath34 is the cooling timescale , @xmath35 the thomson cross - section , and @xmath36 is the lorentz factor of the pulsar wind as it would be in absence of the pair feedback .
the target radiation field is synchrotron radiation of the secondary pairs .
given the photon index @xmath37 , its energy density at @xmath29 is @xmath38 combining equations eq .
( [ effic ] , [ pair_rate ] , [ spec_end ] , [ w1 ] , [ w2 ] ) we find the self - consistent lorentz factor : @xmath39 the feedback efficiency enters eq .
( [ scgamma ] ) inexplicitly , through the ratio @xmath40 . with
this ratio much less than unity the feedback efficiency is @xmath41 .
the lorentz factor , found in this way , depends on the distance to the massive star , @xmath42 .
then , the synchrotron cutoff energy is very sensitive to this distance : @xmath43 .
if this volatile synchrotron cut - off approaches @xmath44 , then the pair feedback enters a different , more robust mode , where the synchrotron photons from secondary pairs get absorbed on themselves , so that the feedback becomes over - efficient and saturates , keeping @xmath45 somewhat below @xmath46 .
the self - consistent lorentz factor now becomes @xmath47 where we substituted @xmath45 for @xmath46 , keeping in mind that dependence of the equilibrium lorentz - factor @xmath7 on @xmath45 is very weak . under typical conditions , eq .
( [ sy_eq_gamma ] ) gives @xmath48 .
the pair feedback model predicts that the radiation from pulsar wind and the shock region contains several spectral components of different origin .
first , it is emission from ( slowly cooling ) primary pairs
inverse compton from stellar radiation , peaked at @xmath49 and synchrotron , peaked at @xmath50 ev , which is overwhelmed by the radiation of the massive star .
next , there is emission from secondary pairs , both synchrotron , peaked at @xmath51 , and ( less efficient due to the klein - nishina effect ) inverse compton , peaked at @xmath52 tev .
the energy of comptonized photons is limited by the energy of secondary pairs . | binary systems massive star compact object sources of high - energy gamma - rays nature of compact objects not known models assume black holes or pulsars present paper consider gamma - ray binaries with pulsars collision of stellar wind with ultrarelativistic pulsar wind pulsar wind assumed source of gamma - rays through inverse compton scattering of stellar photons electrons extreme bulk factor wind termination shock accelerated beyond bulk system dense radiation field stellar photons ultrarelativistic plasma flow pulsar wind launch runaway - like particle acceleration ( converter acceleration ) discussed in gamma - ray bursts active galactic nuclei gamma - ray binaries feedback from pulsar wind to upstream through two - photon pair production possible to construct model properties of gamma - ray binaries without physical processes two - photon pair production feedback cooling of energetic pairs through synchrotron inverse compton radiation physics of gamma - ray binaries complex model demonstrates pair feedback converter acceleration essential component in advanced model for gamma - ray binaries with pulsar windsmodel assume setup parameters ls 5039 ls i + 61 303 typical gamma - ray binary population massive star luminosity @xmath2 erg / s mass - loss rate @xmath3/yr mass outflow due stellar wind velocity @xmath4 pulsar orbits star @xmath5 cm produces magnetized ultrarelativistic wind power @xmath6 erg / s electron - positron pairs lorentz factor @xmath7 @xmath8 magnetization parameter @xmath9 pulsar wind termination shock distance @xmath10 from pulsar dynamical pressures equal energy density pulsar wind @xmath11 @xmath12 energy density background thermal photons star @xmath13 comptonization stellar radiation synchrotron self - compton radiation dominant emission mechanism shock - bounded pulsar wind region filled stellar photons high - energy radiation termination shock forms isotropic uniform photon field photons produce electron - positron pairs picked up pulsar wind energetic lose energy radiation shock shocked plasmasecondary pair production @xmath14 on angular distribution parent photons isotropic velocities secondary pairs uncorrelated with wind velocity pairs picked up by pulsar wind energy increases by factor @xmath15 energetic secondary electrons positrons cool fraction energy radiated before termination shock rest in post - shock cooling efficient post - shock synchrotron emission in synchrotron emission from pairs supplies low - energy target photons for new pairs feedback loop contribution to radiative efficiency shocked pulsar wind estimated as @xmath16 @xmath17 average energy of secondary pair at birth pulsar wind loaded with secondary pairs lorentz factor decreases feedback efficiency @xmath18 less than unity two isotropic populations photons with energies around @xmath19 @xmath20 energy densities @xmath22 and @xmath23 pair production rate equals @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 angle - averaged pair production cross - section @xmath27 @xmath28 energy densities in stellar radiation energy increase of @xmath19 optimal energy of target photons @xmath29 decreases number of target photons opacity goes uplarger @xmath19 energy electron - positron pair birth @xmath17 larger feedback efficiency feedback controlled by inverse compton radiation primary pairs radiated power due to secondary pairs energies @xmath30 upscatter stellar photons klein - nishina suppression main energy - loss channel synchrotron radiation post - shock region secondary pairs form cooling distribution synchrotron spectrum photon index -3/2 extends energy to @xmath31 @xmath32 magnetic field strength post - shock pair feedback secondary pairs born interaction comptonized stellar photons energy density @xmath33 @xmath34 cooling timescale @xmath35 thomson cross - section @xmath36 lorentz factor pulsar wind pair feedback target radiation field synchrotron radiation secondary pairs photon index @xmath37 energy density at @xmath29 @xmath38 self - consistent lorentz factor @xmath39 feedback efficiency enters scgamma through ratio @xmath40 ratio feedback efficiency @xmath41 lorentz factor depends on distance to massive star @xmath42 synchrotron cutoff energy sensitive to distance @xmath43volatile synchrotron @xmath44 pair feedback enters mode synchrotron photons secondary pairs absorbed feedback over - efficient saturates @xmath45 below @xmath46 self - consistent lorentz factor becomes @xmath47 substituted @xmath45 for @xmath46 dependence equilibrium lorentz - factor @xmath7 on @xmath45 weak typical conditions eq gives @xmath48 pair feedback model radiation from pulsar wind shock region contains spectral components different origin emission from primary pairs inverse compton stellar radiation @xmath49 synchrotron @xmath50 overwhelmed by radiation massive star emission from secondary pairs synchrotron @xmath51 inverse compton @xmath52 energy comptonized photons limited by energy secondary pairs | 0.31612 | 1,934 | 998 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,822 | we give an ore - type condition sufficient for a graph @xmath0 to have a spanning tree with small degrees and with few leaves . spanning tree .
bounded degree .
few leaves . | from a classical result by ore @xcite it is well - known that if a simple graph @xmath0 with @xmath1 vertices is such that @xmath2 for each pair @xmath3 of non - adjacent vertices of @xmath0 , then @xmath0 contains a hamiltonian path .
a _ leaf _ of a tree @xmath4 is a vertex of @xmath4 with degree one .
a natural generalisation of hamiltonian paths are spanning trees with a small number of leaves . in this direction ,
ore s result was generalised by broersma and tuinstra @xcite to the following theorem .
@xmath5}$ ] let @xmath6 and @xmath1 be integers .
if @xmath0 is a connected simple graph with @xmath7 vertices such that @xmath8 , for each pair @xmath3 of non - adjacent vertices , then @xmath0 contains a spanning tree with at most @xmath9 leaves .
further related results have been obtained by egawa _
et al _ @xcite and by tsugaki and yamashita @xcite .
see also @xcite for a survey on spanning trees with specific properties . in this note
we consider spanning trees with small degrees as well as with a small number of leaves .
our result is the following .
let @xmath7 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 be integers with @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
if @xmath0 is a @xmath14-connected simple graph with vertex set @xmath15 such that @xmath16 for any non - adjacent vertices @xmath17 and @xmath18 of @xmath0 , then @xmath0 has a spanning tree @xmath4 with at most @xmath19 leaves and such that @xmath20 for @xmath21 .
let @xmath4 be a largest subtree of @xmath0 with at most @xmath22 leaves and such that if @xmath23 , then @xmath24 .
since @xmath0 is @xmath10-connected and @xmath1 , it contains a path with at least @xmath25 vertices .
therefore , we may assume that tree @xmath4 has at least @xmath25 vertices .
if @xmath4 is not a spanning tree , there is a vertex @xmath26 of @xmath0 not in @xmath4 . by menger s theorem , there are @xmath10 internally disjoint paths @xmath27 in @xmath0 joining @xmath26 to @xmath10 different vertices @xmath28 of @xmath4 .
let @xmath29 denote the number of leaves of @xmath4 .
we claim @xmath30 , otherwise there is a vertex @xmath31 such that @xmath32 where @xmath33 .
then @xmath34 is a subtree of @xmath0 with more vertices than @xmath4 such that @xmath35 for each @xmath36 and with at most @xmath37 leaves , which contradicts our assumption on the maximality of @xmath4 . because of ore s theorem
, we can assume @xmath38 for some @xmath39 .
since @xmath4 has @xmath40 leaves , as shown above , there is a vertex @xmath41 of @xmath4 such that @xmath42 .
suppose there are vertices @xmath43 and @xmath44 of degree one in @xmath4 such that @xmath45 .
since @xmath4 is not a path , there is an edge @xmath46 in the unique @xmath47 path contained in @xmath48 with @xmath49 .
let @xmath50 and notice that @xmath51 is a subtree of @xmath0 with @xmath52 , with less than @xmath53 leaves and such that @xmath54 for each @xmath36 .
as above , this is a contradiction and therefore no leaves of @xmath4 are adjacent in @xmath0 .
notice that @xmath55 , otherwise @xmath56 would be a tree larger than @xmath4 , with the same number of leaves and with @xmath57 for each vertex @xmath58 of @xmath51 .
let @xmath17 and @xmath18 be any two leaves of @xmath4 with the property that the vertex @xmath59 lies in the unique @xmath60 path @xmath61 , contained in @xmath4 . orient the edges of @xmath4 in such a way that the corresponding directed tree @xmath62 is outdirected with root @xmath17 ( see fig .
[ one ] . )
because of the way the tree @xmath4 was chosen , all vertices of @xmath0 adjacent to @xmath69 or to @xmath18 lie in @xmath4 and therefore @xmath70 .
let @xmath71 and @xmath72 be vertices of @xmath4 adjacent to @xmath17 in @xmath0 , if @xmath73 for some vertex @xmath74 of @xmath4 , let @xmath75 . since @xmath76 and @xmath77 are edges of @xmath78 , @xmath79 @xmath80 and @xmath51 is a subtree of @xmath0 with @xmath81 , with less than @xmath82 leaves and such that @xmath35 for each @xmath83 .
again , this is a contradiction , therefore @xmath84 .
let @xmath107 and @xmath11 be integers with @xmath108 and @xmath109 and @xmath110 be sets of vertices .
the complete bipartite graph@xmath111 with bipartition @xmath112 is @xmath10-connected , has @xmath113 vertices and is such that @xmath114 for any vertices @xmath17 and @xmath18 of @xmath0 .
nevertheless , if @xmath4 is a spanning tree of @xmath0 , then @xmath115 for some @xmath116 .
this shows that the condition in theorem 2 is tight . | classical result by ore graph @xmath0 vertices @xmath2 each @xmath3 non - adjacent vertices contains hamiltonian path leaf tree @xmath4 vertex @xmath4 degree one hamiltonian paths spanning trees with small leaves ore s result generalised by broersma tuinstra theorem @xmath6 @xmath1 integers @xmath0 connected graph with @xmath7 vertices each pair @xmath3 non - adjacent vertices @xmath0 contains spanning tree with @xmath9 leaves results by egawa et al tsugaki yamashita survey on spanning trees specific properties spanning trees with small degrees small number leaves result @xmath7 @xmath10 @xmath11 integers with @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath0 @xmath14-connected graph vertex set @xmath15 @xmath16 non - adjacent vertices @xmath17 @xmath18 has spanning tree @xmath4 with @xmath19 leaves @xmath21 @xmath4 largest subtree of @xmath0 with @xmath22 leaves @xmath23 @xmath24@xmath0-connected contains path @xmath25 vertices tree @xmath4 has vertices not tree vertex @xmath26 @xmath0 not in @xmath4 menger s theorem @xmath10 disjoint paths @xmath27 @xmath0 joining vertices @xmath28 @xmath4 @xmath29 number leaves @xmath4 @xmath30 vertex @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 subtree @xmath0 more vertices than @xmath35 each @xmath36 @xmath37 leaves contradicts assumption maximality @xmath4 ore s theorem assume @xmath38 for @xmath39 @xmath4 has @xmath40 leaves vertex @xmath41 of @xmath4 vertices @xmath43 @xmath44 degree one in @xmath4 @xmath4 not path edge @xmath46 in @xmath47 path @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath51 subtree @xmath0 @xmath52 less than @xmath53 leaves @xmath54 each @xmath36 contradiction no leaves @xmath4 adjacent in @xmath0@xmath55 @xmath56 larger @xmath4 same leaves @xmath57 vertex @xmath58 @xmath51 @xmath17 @xmath18 leaves @xmath4 vertex @xmath59 in @xmath60 path @xmath61 @xmath4 orient edges @xmath4 tree @xmath62 outdirected @xmath17 fig vertices @xmath0 @xmath69 @xmath18 in @xmath4 @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 vertices @xmath4 @xmath17 @xmath0 @xmath73 vertex @xmath74 @xmath4 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 edges @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath51 subtree @xmath0 @xmath81 less than @xmath82 leaves @xmath35 for each @xmath83 contradiction @xmath84 @xmath107 @xmath11 integers @xmath108 @xmath109 @xmath110 vertices bipartite graph@xmath111 @xmath112 @xmath10-connected @xmath113 vertices @xmath114 vertices @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath0 @xmath4 spanning tree @xmath0 @xmath115 @xmath116 condition theorem 2 tight | 0.183743 | 1,332 | 753 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,823 | the extended ssh model and bogoliubov - de gennes(bdeg ) formalism are applied to investigate the electronic properties and stable lattice configurations of c@xmath0 .
we focus the problem on the molecule s unusual @xmath1 symmetry .
the electronic part of the hamiltonian without coulomb interaction is solved analytically .
we find that the gap between homo and lumo is small due to the long distance hopping between the 2nd and 5th layers .
the charge densities of homo and lumo are mainly distributed in the two layers , that causes a large splitting between the spin triplet and singlet excitons .
the differences of bond lengths , angles and charge densities among the molecule and polarons are discussed .
: c@xmath0 , ssh model , @xmath1 symmetry * contact author * : xiaoqing yu * e - mail * : xyu4@students.uiuc.edu | recently , a new member of fullerenes , c@xmath0 , was synthesized by arc - discharge method and purified in bulk quantities@xcite . up to now , it is the smallest fullerene ever discovered .
the c@xmath0 molecule is more curved than c@xmath2 because of the adjacent pentagonal rings and the small number of carbon atoms@xcite .
this feature suggests stronger electron - phonon interaction and possible higher superconducting transition temperatures in the alkali - doped c@xmath0 solids than those of c@xmath2@xcite .
the solid - state nuclear magnetic resonant experiment suggested that the most favorable configuration of c@xmath0 molecule has @xmath1 symmetry @xcite . this confirmed the results of the early _ ab initio _ pseudopotential density functional calculations@xcite , which indicated that the @xmath1 structure is one of the most energetically favorable structures among several possibilities
. looked in a direction perpendicular to the six - fold axis(fig.1 ) , the molecule is composed of six parallel layers . on each layer , six carbon atoms lie at the vertexes of a hexagon .
the edges of the hexagons of the 1st , 2nd , 5th , 6th layers are parallel , while those of the two hexagons in the middle two layers are turned by an angle of @xmath3 .
in addition to this special structure , the six - fold principal axis is distinct form the ordinary five - fold principal axis in the cases of c@xmath2 and c@xmath4 and little attention has been paid to it . in this paper , we discuss both the electronic and structural properties of c@xmath0 molecule , emphasizing the interesting properties brought by this unusual @xmath1 symmetry .
we employ a simple and elegant model , extended ssh model , which is successful in treating c@xmath2 and c@xmath4@xcite .
the bdeg formalism is performed to obtain the stable lattice configuration and the corresponding electronic states self - consistently .
the electronic part of hamiltonian without coulomb interaction can be solved analytically by methods of group theory .
we find that the electron densities of homo(@xmath5 ) and lumo(@xmath6 ) are zero at the two middle layers .
furthermore , the homo and lumo are mainly confined in the 2nd and 5th layers with a possibility of @xmath7 .
the gap between them is considerably small , compared to that of c@xmath2 and c@xmath4 , because the splitting of homo and lumo is due to a long - distance hopping in our case .
we find the large splitting of the triplet and singlet excitons due to more localized homo an lumo in comparison with c@xmath2 and c@xmath4 . as a result
, the triplet exciton s energy is very small and possible experiments are suggested to test this phenomenum .
the geometrical figures of c@xmath0 molecule and polarons are discussed and bond lengths and angles are calculated . the charge density on each layer
are given .
we find that the differences of charge densities among polarons and molecule are mainly in the 2nd and 5th layers .
the following sections are arranged as : in sec.@xmath8 , the extended ssh model is introduced ; in sec.@xmath9 , we analytically solve the electronic part of the hamiltonian without coulomb interaction ; in sec.@xmath10 , the whole hamiltonian is solved self - consistently ; in sec.@xmath11 , results and discussions are presented ; and conclusions are made in the final section .
the hamiltonian of the extended ssh model to the c@xmath0 molecule is written as : @xmath12 the first term @xmath13 of eq.(1 ) is the hopping term of @xmath14-electrons .
@xmath15(c_{i\sigma}^\dagger c_{j\sigma}+h.c . ) -{\sum_{\langle i , j \rangle}}^\prime t_1(c_{i\sigma}^\dagger c_{j\sigma}+h.c . )
\nonumber\\ & -&{\sum_{\langle i , j \rangle}}^{\prime\prime } t_2(c_{i\sigma}^\dagger c_{j\sigma}+h.c.)\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the three terms describe hopping between the nearest neighbors , the next nearest neighbors and the third neighbors respectively , with the corresponding hopping integrals @xmath16 and @xmath17 . the influence of electron - phonon coupling is only included in the first term of @xmath13 , since those of the last two terms are much smaller than @xmath18 .
the third term is important here because it changes the accidental degeneracy of homo and lumo states , which will be explained in the next section .
the larger distance terms are neglected , as they are small and do not bring any new effects .
the second term of eq.(1 ) is the screened coulomb interaction expressed in the hubbard model .
@xmath19 where @xmath20 is the strength of the on - site interaction , and @xmath21 is that between the nearest neighbors .
the third term of eq.(1 ) is the elastic energy of the lattice .
this term is composed of three parts , @xmath22 where the first part describes the spring energy of bond - length terms , and the next two terms describe the spring energy of the angular terms .
@xmath23 are the elastic constants for these different kinds of lattice vibrations .
@xmath24 are bond angle deviations from the original angle @xmath25 .
e.g. @xmath26 .
the first summation is taken up over all nearest pairs .
the second is of all interior angles of pentagons .
and the third is of all interior angles of hexagons . since there are no enough experiment data to determine the semiempirical parameters , we set the values in the scope of fullerenes such as c@xmath2 and c@xmath4 which can produce reasonable results . we adjust them to give the gap between homo and lumo and the bond length consistent with those of the pseudopotential density functional approach .
we take @xmath27 ev , @xmath28 ev / , @xmath29 , @xmath30 ev/ @xmath31 , @xmath32 ev / rad@xmath31 , @xmath33 ev / rad@xmath31 , @xmath34 .
in fact , the particular values , except for the value of @xmath17 , would not affect the physics too much . based on the calculation of the third - nearest @xmath14-orbit integral ,
@xmath17 was estimated to be 0.111@xmath18 .
.the analytical solution of @xmath13 without @xmath35 and @xmath17 terms . [ cols=">,>,^,^,^",options="header " , ] the configurations and energy of ground and low excited states are given below , @xmath36 we can see that the ground state @xmath37 is a spin singlet rather than triplet after the long distance hopping @xmath17 and electron - electron interaction are taken into account , which is an improvement of the prediction of simple hckel theory , and there is no need to add the hybridizing of @xmath38 and @xmath14 bonds to investigate the qualitative physics of c@xmath0 as discussed in ref.@xcite . the lowest excited states @xmath39 are spin triplet excitons , which are only about @xmath40ev above the ground states .
the energy of singlet exciton @xmath41 is very high , and the splitting between the triplet and singlet excitons is about 0.63ev , which is much larger than 0.2ev in the cases of c@xmath2 and c@xmath4 .
this is because the electrons of homo and lumo are more localized , @xmath7 in the 2nd and 5th layers and @xmath42 in the 1st and 6th layers .
compared to the c@xmath0 case , the electron densities of homo and lumo in c@xmath2 and c@xmath4 are distributed more uniformly over all sites , so the splitting of the singlet and triplet exciton due to the coulomb interaction is relatively small . the fact that the triplet exciton has low energy can be verified through experiment observation : when illuminated by external light , the c@xmath0 can be excited to the state of singlet exciton and then may transit to triplet exciton through nonradiative decay .
the transition rate to ground state is slow because of the different spin configuration and small energy splitting .
we predict that the triplet excitons are metastable states , and the phosphorescence phenomena is possible to be observed .
the triplet exciton is paramagnetic while the ground state is a diamagnetic singlet .
so the magnetic susceptibility is increased upon illumination of the external light .
electron spin resonance(esr ) experiment can be performed to detect the triplet exciton states . when esr is performed to a solution sample ,
the usual unimportant magnetic dipole interaction between electrons becomes crucial because its anisotropy can smear the resonance peak .
however , this interaction is decayed rapidly with distance as @xmath43 .
the electrons in homo and lumo are mainly uniformly distributed on 12 carbon atoms in two layers , the possibility of their short distance is considerably small compared to other small organic molecule , such as naphthalene .
so the resonance peak is possible to be observed .
the phone absorption and luminescence spectra experiments can be perform to test the lowest singlet exciton s energy .
the shape of the c@xmath0 molecule is an ellipsoid with high aspect ratios .
our calculation shows that the distance between the 1st and 6th layers is @xmath44 , and that between the parallel vertical hexagon planes is @xmath45 . the charge density , bond lengths and bond angles of c@xmath0 molecule and ions are calculated and shown in table 2 , 3 and 4 .
we note that because of the @xmath1 symmetry of the molecule , the 1st and 6th layers are regular hexagons , with each internal angle @xmath46 and the shortest bonds ( @xmath47 ) @xmath48 .
the six vertical hexagons around the equator are slightly deformed due to the drag of the 1st and 6th layers from each side .
@xmath49 is @xmath50 longer than @xmath47 and @xmath51 than @xmath52 .
the @xmath53 bonds are relatively weaker than those in hexagons , because they couple the hexagons in the two ends with the hexagons around the equator .
@xmath53 is @xmath54 longer than @xmath47 .
this result is consistent with that of lda except that the @xmath49 is as long as @xmath52 in lda , and we think that our result is more reasonable .
the bond lengths of @xmath52 and @xmath49 of ions differ from those of molecule very slightly .
but the negative polarons @xmath47 is longer and positive polaron is shorter than the neutral molecule s , while the @xmath53 changes in the opposite way .
the reason is that the wavefunctions of the electron in @xmath5 and @xmath6 has opposite sign between two nearest sites connected by @xmath47 , same sign by @xmath53 , and have zero amplitude on the 3rd , 4th layers . according to the contribution f these two states form hopping term , the sites connected by @xmath47 are repulsive , but those connected by @xmath53 are attractive .
the angles in the pentagons and hexagons around the equator deviate from @xmath55 and @xmath46 slightly , which justifies the validity of @xmath56 .
the bond angles in polarons differ from those of molecule very slightly , so we omit them in table 4 .
form c@xmath57 polaron to c@xmath58 , the adding electrons distribute mostly in the 2nd and 5th layers .
this is because of the particular charge density distribution of the 18th and 19 t levels .
in this paper , we have carefully studied the effect of @xmath1 symmetry on c@xmath0 s electronic properties under the extended ssh model .
a small gap between homo(@xmath59 ) and lumo(@xmath60 ) is obtained due to long distance hopping .
the large splitting of the spin triplet and singlet lowest excitons , the differences of bond lengthes and electron density between molecule and polarons are discussed as results brought by the more localized homo and lumo and their special symmetries .
possilbe experiments are suggested . | new member fullerenes c@xmath0 synthesized by arc - discharge purified in bulk quantities smallest fullerene discovered c@xmath0 molecule more curved than c@xmath2 adjacent pentagonal rings small carbon atoms suggests stronger electron - phonon interaction higher superconducting transition temperatures in alkali - doped c@xmath0 solids than@xmath2 solid - state nuclear magnetic resonant experiment suggested favorable configuration c@xmath0 molecule @xmath1 symmetry confirmed early pseudopotential density functional calculations @xmath1 structure energetically favorable to six - fold axis molecule six parallel layers each six carbon atoms at vertexes hexagon edges 1st 2nd 5th 6th layers parallel two middle turned by angle @xmath3 six - fold principal axis distinct form ordinary five - fold principal axis c@xmath2 c@xmath4 paper discuss electronic structural properties of c@xmath0 molecule emphasizing unusual @xmath1 symmetry model extended ssh model successful treating c@xmath2 c@xmath4bdeg formalism stable lattice configuration electronic states electronic part of hamiltonian without coulomb interaction solved by group theory electron densities of homo@xmath5 lumo(@xmath6 ) zero at middle layers homo lumo confined in 2nd 5th layers possibility @xmath7 gap small compared to c@xmath2@xmath4 splitting due to long - distance hopping large splitting triplet singlet excitons due to localized homo lumo triplet exciton s energy small experiments suggested test geometrical figures of c@xmath0 molecule polarons discussed bond lengths angles calculated charge density on each layer given differences charge densities among polarons molecule in 2nd 5th layers sections arranged@xmath8 extended ssh model introduced@xmath9 electronic part hamiltonian without coulomb interaction whole hamiltonian solved self - consistently results discussions presented conclusions final section hamiltonian of extended ssh model to c@xmath0 molecule written as @xmath12 first term @xmath13 hopping term of @xmath14-electrons @xmath15+h-{\sum_{\langle^\prime t_1(c_{i\sigma}^\dagger c_{j\sigma}+h.c{\sum{\langle j\rangle}}^{\prime t_2(c_{i\sigma}^\dagger c_{j\sigma}+h.c.)\end{aligned} three terms describe hopping between nearest hopping integrals @xmath16 @xmath17 influence electron - phonon coupling first term @xmath13 last two terms smaller than @xmath18 third term changes accidental degeneracy of homo lumo states explained next larger distance terms neglected small new effects second term eq.(1 ) screened coulomb interaction hubbard model @xmath19 @xmath20 strength on - site interaction @xmath21 between nearest neighbors third term elastic energy of lattice term three parts @xmath22 first spring energy bond - length terms spring energy angular terms @xmath23 elastic constants for lattice vibrations @xmath24 bond angle deviations from original angle @xmath25 @xmath26 first summation all nearest pairs second interior angles pentagons third interior angles hexagonsno enough experiment data semiempirical parameters set values in scope fullerenes c@xmath2 c@xmath4 reasonable results adjust gap between homo lumo bond length consistent with pseudopotential density functional approach take @xmath27 ev ev values except @xmath17 affect physics calculation third - nearest @xmath14-orbit integral @xmath17 estimated 0.111@xmath18 analytical solution of @xmath13 without @xmath35 @xmath17 terms configurations energy of ground low excited states below ground state @xmath37 spin singlet triplet after long distance hopping @xmath17 electron - electron interaction improvement prediction simple hckel theory no need to add hybridizing of @xmath38 @xmath14 bonds qualitative physics of c@xmath0 lowest excited states @xmath39 are spin triplet excitons about @xmath40ev above ground states energy of singlet exciton @xmath41 high splitting between triplet singlet excitons about 0.63ev larger than 0.2ev in c@xmath2 and c@xmath4electrons of homo lumo localized @xmath7 2nd 5th layers @xmath42 1st 6th layers@xmath0 electron densities homo lumo in c@xmath2@xmath4 distributed uniformly sites splitting singlet triplet exciton small triplet exciton low energy verified experiment observation illuminated by light c@xmath0 excited to singlet exciton transit to triplet exciton transition to ground state slow different spin configuration small energy splitting triplet excitons metastable states phosphorescence phenomena possible triplet exciton paramagnetic ground state diamagnetic singlet magnetic susceptibility increased illumination external light electron spin resonance ) experiment detect triplet exciton states magnetic dipole interaction between electrons crucial anisotropy resonance peak interaction decayed rapidly with distance @xmath43 electrons in homo lumo uniformly distributed on 12 carbon atoms two layers short distance small compared resonance peak possible observed phone absorption luminescence spectra experiments test lowest singlet exciton s energy shape c@xmath0 molecule ellipsoid with high aspect ratioscalculation shows distance between 1st 6th layers @xmath44 parallel vertical hexagon planes @xmath45 charge density bond lengths angles of@xmath0 molecule ions calculated shown in table 2 3 4 @xmath1 symmetry 1st 6th layers regular hexagons internal angle @xmath46 shortest bonds @xmath48 six vertical hexagons around equator slightly deformed due drag 6th layers @xmath49 longer than @xmath47 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 bonds weaker hexagons ends equator @xmath53 longer than @xmath47 result consistent with lda @xmath49 as long as @xmath52 in lda result more reasonable bond lengths of @xmath52 @xmath49 ions differ molecule slightly negative polarons @xmath47 longer positive shorter than neutral molecule @xmath53 changes opposite wavefunctions electron in @xmath5 @xmath6 opposite sign between sites connected by @xmath47 @xmath53 zero amplitude on 3rd 4th layers sites connected by @xmath47 repulsive @xmath53 attractiveangles pentagons hexagons equator deviate @xmath55 @xmath46 justifies validity @xmath56 bond angles polarons differ molecule omit table 4@xmath57 to electrons distribute 2nd 5th layers charge density distribution 18th 19 t levels studied effect @xmath1 symmetry c@xmath0 s electronic properties extended ssh model small gap between homo(@xmath59 lumo(@xmath60 long distance hopping large splitting spin triplet singlet lowest excitons differences bond lengthes electron density between molecule polarons localized homo lumo special symmetries experiments suggested | 0.436666 | 2,780 | 1,451 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,830 | we report the first measurements of the effect of pressure on vibrational modes in emulsions , which serve as a model for soft frictionless spheres at zero temperature . as a function of the applied pressure , we find that the density of states @xmath0 exhibits a low - frequency cutoff @xmath1 , which scales linearly with the number of extra contacts per particle @xmath2 . moreover , for @xmath3 , @xmath4 ; a quadratic behavior whose prefactor is larger than what is expected from debye theory .
this surprising result agrees with recent theoretical findings @xcite .
finally , the degree of localization of the softest low frequency modes increases with compression , as shown by the participation ratio as well as their spatial configurations .
overall , our observations show that emulsions are marginally stable and display non - plane - wave modes up to vanishing frequencies . due to their translational symmetry ,
the vibrational modes of crystals are plane waves that exhibit the debye scaling in the density of states , @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the spatial dimension .
by contrast , amorphous materials , such as granular materials and glasses , exhibit peculiar elastic properties . in particular , they display an excess of low frequency vibrational modes in the density of states compared to crystalline solids , known as the `` boson '' peak @xcite . in simple model systems , such as sphere packings ,
the boson peak diverges in amplitude as the pressure is lowered towards the unjamming transition @xcite .
the associated soft modes are responsible for anomalous elastic and transport properties @xcite and play an important role in plasticity and activated events @xcite . as the applied pressure increases above the jamming transition , their spatial localization increases @xcite .
theoretically , it was argued that these properties result from the fact that packings near jamming are _ marginally stable _ : their structure is such that they lie at the threshold of a linear elastic instability controlled by pressure and coordination @xcite .
very recently , a mean - field approximation @xcite and exact calculations in infinite dimensions @xcite indicated that for marginally stable structures at low frequencies @xmath4 in any spatial dimension , where @xmath7 is a characteristic frequency of the soft modes . in three dimensions ,
this quadratic behavior matches the debye result , but with a much larger prefactor .
this result remains untested in real materials .
experimentally , the density of states of colloidal glasses in 2d has been obtained from the thermal motion of the particles as a function of the global density below the glass transition @xcite . however
, experimental tests on athermal particulate packings and in 3d are lacking in the literature , and are appropriate to accurately test if materials are indeed marginally stable . in this letter
, we experimentally investigate the pressure dependence of the density of states and the localization of vibrational modes in compressed emulsions . because emulsions are effectively at zero temperature , the present experiment appears close enough to the jamming transition to precisely probe its properties .
we find that the density of states can be rescaled by some frequency @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the packing fraction and @xmath10 its ( preparation dependent ) value at the jamming threshold , and find that it is consistent with the recently proposed scaling behavior @xmath11@xcite .
finally , we examine the microscopic configuration of the soft modes by measuring the participation ratio of the particles and their spatial distribution .
we find delocalized soft modes near jamming , and localized soft modes far above jamming .
( color online ) confocal image of an emulsion at a pressure of @xmath12 kpa and @xmath13 ( greyscale ) . for each reconstructed droplet @xmath14 in the middle
, the low - frequency vibrational amplitude in the color map ( dim to bright ) is obtained as @xmath15 , where @xmath16 is the polarizaton vector of the @xmath17th eigenmode , summing over the lowest @xmath18 modes . ]
our experimental system is an oil - in - water emulsion , described in references @xcite , which is a model for soft , frictionless , athermal sphere packings with an average droplet radius @xmath19 and a polydispersity of @xmath20 .
the refractive index matched emulsion is transparent and the nile red dye reveals the 3d packing of droplets using a confocal microscope ( leica tcs sp5 ii ) . due to a density difference between the droplets and the continuous phase , the lowest compression rate is achieved by creaming under gravity , which gives a packing fraction of @xmath21 due to polydispersity , while centrifugation for 20 minutes at an acceleration rate of 3000 g leads to highly compressed structures with @xmath22 @xcite . allowing the emulsion to relax to its uncompressed state over a period of several days
probes a broad range of intermediate packing densities @xcite , an example of which is shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] .
the packings are analyzed using a fourier transform algorithm to identify the particle positions and radii @xcite .
we then extract the repulsive force @xmath23 exerted by particle @xmath24 on particle @xmath14 via the princen model @xcite : @xmath25 where @xmath26 and @xmath27 denote the particle positions , @xmath28 is the area of droplet deformation , or the geometric area of overlap between the reconstructed spheres @xcite , @xmath29 is the weighted mean radius of the droplets , and @xmath30 is the interfacial tension .
we therefore sum over the force moment tensor for all contacts @xmath31 and then divide by the volume of the box to obtain the total pressure on the system , @xmath32 from the forces , we construct the interaction potential between contacting particles @xmath33 , where @xmath34 . this potential is harmonic for small deformations .
to ensure mechanical equilibrium , we numerically quench the system into the nearest energy minimum to satisfy force balance using the method of steepest descent @xcite .
this procedure does not move any of the particles beyond the resolution of the droplet finding technique , which is one third of a voxel size ( i.e. @xmath35 nm , or @xmath36 of the average droplet diameter ) .
this correction does not have a measurable effect on the calculation of the density of states done below and gives validity to the force model in eq . .
we then calculate the corresponding hessian matrices , defined for every pair @xmath14 , @xmath24 of particles in contact as @xmath37 , where the first term stems from the contact stiffness and the second from the contact force : @xmath38 and @xmath39 where the notation @xmath40 indicates that particle @xmath41 is in contact with particle @xmath14 .
the polarization vectors @xmath42 and the eigenfrequencies @xmath43 can now be calculated via solution of the eigenvalue problem @xmath44 where @xmath45 denotes the mass of particle @xmath14 .
note that in our system inertia is negligible , and dynamically modes would be overdamped .
here we have included the masses to allow for a closer comparison with the literature .
an alternative choice is to set @xmath46 for all @xmath14 .
then our analysis would correspond to the normal modes of the hessian , which characterize the amplitude of thermal fluctuations ( independently of the damping mechanism ) .
we have checked that both choices lead to essentially identical results .
the amplitudes of the polarization vectors @xmath42 are visualized in fig .
[ fig1 ] .
since each particle must have all its neighbors and forces identified , we use @xmath47 particles in the middle of the experimental packing for each compression and repeat the experiment three times to collect statistics .
we thus obtain a histogram of eigenmodes , i.e. the density of states @xmath0 , where @xmath48 is shown in units of natural frequency in fig .
[ fig2](a ) for different levels of compression .
the microscopic frequency is given by @xmath49rad / s , where stiffness @xmath50 .
as expected , the log - log representation reveals a cut - off frequency at high values , and a progressive increase in the number of low - frequency modes as we approach the jamming transition under gravity , in agreement with numerical simulations @xcite .
excess soft modes are generally characterized by the ratio @xmath51 , which often presents a maximum in simulations and in experiments on molecular glasses @xcite .
our results do not reveal a maximum in @xmath52 , as shown in the supplemental material , similar to previously observed data from numerical packings of soft spheres @xcite .
this absence of a peak can be understood in terms of the effect of the experimental control parameter , the pressure , on the system .
pressure affects vibrational properties in two distinct ways : first , it affects the packing fraction , which in turn increases the mean number of contacts between particles , or coordination @xmath53 , and tends to stabilize the system further .
this is illustrated in the inset of fig.[fig2](b ) , from previous measurements in the same set - up @xcite .
second , pressure directly has a destabilizing effect that can lead to a `` buckling '' phenomenon where soft modes become unstable @xcite .
these effects can be disentangled by considering the density of states with and without the applied stress term , i.e. by using @xmath54 or @xmath55 , respectively in eq.[007 ] . in the latter case
, we keep the geometric configurations that were formed due to the applied pressure , but we effectively replace our droplets by point particles connected with relaxed springs . as predicted @xcite , we find that @xmath0 is affected by pressure only below a certain crossover frequency , @xmath1 , which is extracted as the frequency below which the densities of states with and without the pressure term begin to deviate ( see fig .
s1 in si ) . note that @xmath52 has a maximum near @xmath1 if @xmath56 alone is considered .
marginal stability @xcite indicates that as pressure increases , the stabilizing effect of increasing coordination ( apparent when considering @xmath56 alone ) precisely matches the direct destabilizing effect of the pressure ( induced by the term @xmath57 in the hessian ) . in other words ,
the packing just makes enough contacts to remain stable . as a result
, it can be proven that @xmath58 @xcite .
we confirm this prediction in fig.[fig2](b ) .
these findings agree quantitatively with theory and numerical simulations @xcite , unlike recent colloidal experiments probing the jamming transition @xcite
. for the rescaled @xmath59 for all pressures shows good agreement with the predicted slope of @xmath60 in eq.[dw ] . ]
another prediction of marginal stability is that there is no debye regime at all .
instead , the theory of marginal stability leads to @xmath61 below @xmath1 @xcite , with a factor larger than the theoretical prediction for the debye model @xcite , which would predict that @xmath62 .
rescaling our data in fig.[fig2](a ) by @xmath59 reveals a satisfying data collapse for all pressures in fig.[fig.3 ] , consistent with eq.[dw ] .
this result is in agreement with recent numerical simulations in high dimensions @xcite .
since @xmath1 decreases to zero at the jamming transition , the regime below @xmath1 becomes progressively smaller , and the experimental resolution may not be high enough to definitively rule out the debye result .
however , together with the softening of modes with compression , our results strongly support marginal stability .
next , we study the degree of localization of vibrational modes by computing the participation ratio @xmath63 of a mode @xmath17 as a function of the applied pressure : @xmath64 the value of @xmath63 ranges from @xmath65 to @xmath66 , from modes localized to one particle to extended modes , in which all particles participate .
fig.[fig3](a ) shows that the higher the compression and the lower the frequency , the lower the participation ratio , suggesting increasing localization .
this observation is consistent with 2d experiments @xcite , three dimensional @xcite and higher dimensional simulations @xcite .
the participation ratio does not report on the spatial configuration of the participating particles .
it is therefore useful to visualize the increase in the degree of localization using a color map ( from light to dark blue ) for the vibrational amplitudes of the lowest frequency mode in the packing under gravity and that of the highest compression , @xmath67kpa , as shown in fig.[fig3](b , c ) , respectively .
these configurations clearly show the distinction between extended and localized modes . at intermediate frequencies and pressures ,
the modes exhibit a coexistence between localized and disordered modes . in conclusion
, we have characterized experimentally the effect of pressure on the spectrum of the vibrational modes for compressed emulsions .
our central results are that both the scaling of the characteristic frequency @xmath1 as well as the behavior of @xmath0 for @xmath68 are consistent with the notion that emulsion are marginally stable . in the range that can be probed experimentally ,
our observations agree with recent quantitative mean - field theories describing such a marginal behavior @xcite , giving empirical support for these views . in the future
, it would be very interesting to study if marginal stability is robust to different system preparations , and if it survives at very large compression @xcite .
we thank eric degiuli and eric vanden - eijnden for insightful discussions .
this work was supported primarily by the materials research science and engineering center ( mrsec ) program of the national science foundation under award number dmr-1420073 .
29ifxundefined [ 1 ] ifx#1 ifnum [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo ifx [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo `` `` # 1''''@noop
[ 0]secondoftwosanitize@url [ 0 ] + 12$12 & 12#1212_12%12@startlink[1]@endlink[0]@bib@innerbibempty @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop _ _ , edited by , , vol .
( , ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physreve.72.051306 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.107.108301 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1063/1.3157261 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.110.048302 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) | ( a ) the density of states @xmath52 at 4 different pressures . the cutoff @xmath69 is identified as the point where the hessian matrix with ( solid line ) and without the stress term ( dashed line ) diverge . ] | density states @xmath52 4 pressures cutoff @xmath69 point hessian matrix solid line without stress term dashed line diverge | 0.066229 | 51 | 27 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,844 | when the optical reflectance spectrum of a sample under high pressure is studied with a diamond anvil cell , it is measured at a sample / diamond interface . due to the large refractive index of diamond ,
the resulting reflectance @xmath0 may substantially differ from that measured in vacuum . to obtain optical constants from @xmath0 , therefore
, the usual kramers - kronig ( kk ) analysis can not be straightforwardly applied , and either a spectral fitting or a modified kk transform has been used . here
we describe an alternative method to perform kk analysis on @xmath0 .
this method relies on the usual kk transform with an appropriate cutoff and extrapolation to @xmath0 , and may offer a simpler approach to obtain infrared conductivity from measured @xmath0 . | infrared ( ir ) spectroscopy has been a powerful tool to study the microscopic carrier dynamics and electronic structures in strongly correlated electron materials , such as rare earth ( @xmath1 electron ) , transition metal ( @xmath2 electron ) , and organic ( @xmath3 electron ) compounds @xcite .
the ir spectroscopy technique has been also performed under high pressure using a diamond anvil cell ( dac ) [ 2 - 13 ] since the strongly correlated materials show many interesting physical properties under high pressure . in a dac ,
a pair of diamond anvils and a thin metal gasket are used to seal a sample and a pressure transmitting medium @xcite .
a typical diameter of the diamond surface is 0.8 mm to reach a pressure of 10 gpa , and 0.6 mm to reach 20 gpa .
therefore the sample in this experiment should have dimensions of the order of 100 @xmath4 m . to perform an infrared ( ir ) reflectance study on such a small sample under the restricted sample space in a dac
, synchrotron radiation ( sr ) has been used as a bright source of both far and mid - infrared .
in fact , high pressure ir spectroscopy with dac is currently one of the major applications of ir - sr [ 4 - 7,9 - 13 ] . with a dac
, the reflectance is measured between the sample / diamond interface , in contrast to the usual case of sample / vacuum or sample / air interface .
the normal - incidence reflectance of a sample relative to a transparent medium of ( real ) refractive index @xmath5 is given by the fresnel s formula as @xcite : @xmath6 here , @xmath7 is the complex refractive index of the sample , and @xmath5=2.4 for diamond and 1.0 for vacuum .
hereafter , we denote @xmath8 at sample / diamond interface as @xmath0 , and that at sample / vacuum interface as @xmath9 . from eq .
( 1 ) , it is easily seen that @xmath0 of a sample measured in dac may be substantially different from @xmath9 .
the purpose of this study is to consider the kramers - kronig ( kk ) analysis of @xmath0 data measured in dac .
kk analysis has been widely used to derive optical constants such as the refractive index , dielectric function and optical conductivity from a measured @xmath9 spectrum @xcite . however , due to the difference between @xmath9 and @xmath0 discussed above , the usual kk analysis method can not be straightforwardly applied to @xmath0 @xcite . to derive optical constants from @xmath0 , therefore ,
previous high pressure ir studies used either a drude - lorentz spectral fitting @xcite or a modified kk transform @xcite . in this work ,
we propose a different method , which relies on the usual kk transform with an appropriate cutoff to the @xmath0 , as an alternative approach to obtain the infrared @xmath10 from @xmath0 .
the validity of the proposed method is demonstrated with actually measured reflectance data of prru@xmath11p@xmath12 .
the complex reflectivity of the electric field , @xmath13 , is expressed as @xcite @xmath14 here @xmath15 is the square root of the reflectance @xmath8 , which is actually measured in experiments .
then the real and imaginary parts of @xmath16 can be expressed in terms of @xmath17 and @xmath18 as @xmath19 and @xmath20 respectively .
therefore , if @xmath21 can be derived from measured @xmath15 with kk analysis even for the sample / diamond reflection case , @xmath22 and @xmath23 can also be derived simply by setting @xmath5=2.4 in eqs .
( 2 ) and ( 3 ) .
then , the imaginary part of the complex dielectric function is given as @xmath24 , and the optical conductivity is given as @xmath25 @xcite . in performing kk analysis on reflectance data , usually the logarithm of @xmath13 , namely @xmath26
is regarded as a complex response function . in the case of sample / vacuum reflection
, the kk relation between @xmath27 and @xmath21 is expressed as @xcite @xmath28 here , @xmath29 denotes the principal value . in deriving this relation
, it is required that @xmath30 has no poles in the upper complex @xmath31 plane when @xmath32 is finite .
this is correct since @xmath33 only when @xmath34 in the case of @xmath5=1 .
however , when @xmath35 as in the case of sample / diamond interface , @xmath36 may be satisfied at some point on the upper imaginary axis @xcite . this point is denoted as @xmath37 , where @xmath38 is a real , positive and finite number . when @xmath36 , @xmath39 from eq .
( 2 ) and @xmath40 therefore has a pole at @xmath37 .
accordingly , the kk relation in this case must be modified to @xcite @xmath41.\ ] ] namely , the presence of a medium with @xmath35 brings an extra phase shift , indicated by the square bracket in eq .
( 7 ) , into the kk relation .
note that the extra phase shift is a decreasing function of @xmath42 , and that the original kk relation of eq .
( 6 ) is recovered when @xmath43 @xcite .
detailed theoretical considerations on the extra phase shift in various situations have been reported @xcite . in the case of actual experimental studies , however , the precise value of @xmath38 may not be known .
accordingly , the value of @xmath38 has been estimated from experimental @xmath0 data by use of a combination of dl fitting and the modified kk transform @xcite . in this method
, one uses eq .
( 7 ) with @xmath44 and looks for a value of @xmath38 that well reproduces the @xmath10 given by a dl fitting of @xmath0 .
note that , on the other hand , if the frequency range of interest is lower than the value of @xmath38 , effects of the extra phase may be only minor , and the usual kk transform of eq .
( 6 ) , combined with the use of @xmath5=2.4 in eqs .
( 3 ) and ( 4 ) , might give sufficiently accurate values of optical constants .
we will examine the validity of such a procedure in the next section .
here , we use @xmath9 spectra actually measured on prru@xmath11p@xmath12 @xcite .
this compound is well known for showing a metal - to - insulator transition at about 60 k @xcite , and a clear energy gap in @xmath10 was observed in our previous work @xcite .
here we use @xmath9 at 60 k ( metal ) and 9 k ( insulator ) measured over a wide photon energy range of 0.008 - 30 ev @xcite , which are shown by the blue curve in figs .
1(a ) and 2(a ) . is the reflectance spectrum of prru@xmath11p@xmath12 measured at 60 k in vacuum @xcite , and @xmath0 is that expected in a dac calculated from @xmath9 as described in the text .
the green , red , and light blue curves are @xmath45 extrapolations with cutoff energies of @xmath46=1.5 , 2 , and 5 ev , respectively .
( b ) the optical conductivity ( @xmath47 ) obtained with kk analysis of @xmath9 is compared with those obtained with kk analysis of @xmath0 with a cutoff at @xmath46=1.5 , 2 , and 5 ev , and @xmath45 extrapolations above them . below 1.5 ev , @xmath10 obtained from @xmath0 with @xmath46=2 ev agrees very well with that obtained from @xmath9 . ]
the procedure is the following . *
the full @xmath9 spectrum is kk analyzed with eq .
( 6 ) to obtain @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath10 . *
the above @xmath22 and @xmath23 are substituted into eq .
( 1 ) with @xmath5=2.4 to derive @xmath0 that is _ expected _ in a dac . * the @xmath0 obtained above
is used with the usual kk transform of eq .
( 6 ) and @xmath5=2.4 in eqs .
( 3 ) and ( 4 ) , to obtain @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath10 .
before this is done , an appropriate cutoff and extrapolation are made to the @xmath0 , as described in detail below .
if the kk analysis on @xmath0 works properly , the resulting @xmath10 from ( iii ) should well agree with that given by @xmath9 and the usual kk analysis .
we first examine the 60 k data .
the expected @xmath0 at 60 k obtained by ( i ) and ( ii ) is indicated by the black curve in fig .
1(a ) . in carrying out the integration in eq .
( 6 ) , the @xmath9 spectrum were extrapolated below 0.008 ev and above 30 ev with the hagen - rubens and @xmath45 functions , respectively .
it is seen in fig .
1(a ) that @xmath0 shows very high values above about 4 ev .
this physically unrealistic feature resulted from the unphysical assumption of constant @xmath5=2.4 in the entire spectral range . in reality , of course , the refractive index of diamond can not be constant and real near and above the band gap , where it shows strong light absorption .
in addition , when @xmath34 , @xmath48 and @xmath49 , and therefore @xmath50 must hold just like any other material . accordingly , before performing kk transform in ( iii ) , @xmath0 in fig .
1(a ) was cut off at some energy @xmath46 , and then it was extrapolated with @xmath45 function .
several different values of @xmath46 were tried , as shown in fig .
for each value of @xmath46 , the usual kk transform of eq .
( 6 ) was made to get @xmath21 , which was then used to derive @xmath22 and @xmath23 with @xmath5=2.4 in eqs .
( 3 ) and ( 4 ) , and to finally obtain @xmath10 .
figure 1(b ) shows the @xmath10 spectra obtained as described above , with different values of @xmath46 which are also indicated in fig .
it is seen that the obtained @xmath10 spectra strongly depend on @xmath46 . with @xmath46=2.0
ev , the resulting @xmath10 below 1.5 ev agrees very well with that derived from the original @xmath9 .
( actually , @xmath46=2.2 ev gives the best agreement , but @xmath46=2.0 ev data is shown instead .
this is because the 2.2 ev data almost completely overlaps with that from @xmath9 , making it difficult to distinguish them in the figure . )
the result for the 9 k data , where the sample is an insulator ( semiconductor ) , is also shown in fig . 2 .
a good agreement is again observed between the @xmath10 derived from the full @xmath9 and that from @xmath0 with @xmath46=2 ev .
the spectral range of their good agreement is below 1.5 ev , which is similar to the case of 60 k data discussed above .
note also that both 9 k and 60 k data show good agreement with the common value of @xmath46= 2 ev .
these results show that , for any spectral change in @xmath0 ( either temperature- or pressure - induced ) below 1.5 ev , the corresponding @xmath10 can be obtained by the present method .
in actual high pressure studies of strongly correlated materials with dac [ 2 - 13 ] , @xmath0 is usually measured below 1 - 2 ev .
hence , above the high energy limit of @xmath0 measurement , the @xmath0 expected from @xmath9 can be connected to the measured @xmath0 , with the cutoff and extrapolation discussed above .
then the connected @xmath0 may be kk transformed to obtain @xmath10 , as discussed above . an obvious condition required for this method to work properly is that the pressure- and temperature - induced changes of @xmath0 should be limited below certain energy , which is 1.5 ev for prru@xmath11p@xmath12 as seen in figs .
1(b ) and 2(b ) .
this condition is actually met in the high pressure data of prru@xmath11p@xmath12 , which has enabled us to derive its @xmath10 under pressure up to 14 gpa using the present method @xcite .
is the reflectance spectrum of prru@xmath11p@xmath12 measured at 9 k in vacuum @xcite , and @xmath0 is that expected in a dac calculated from @xmath9 as described in the text .
the green , red , and light blue curves are @xmath45 extrapolations with cutoff energies of @xmath46=1.5 , 2 , and 5 ev , respectively .
( b ) the optical conductivity ( @xmath47 ) obtained with kk analysis of @xmath9 is compared with those obtained with kk analysis of @xmath0 with a cutoff at @xmath46=1.5 , 2 , and 5 ev , and @xmath45 extrapolations above them . ]
we have also done similar simulations for other compounds , both metals and insulators , using actually measured data , and have obtained similar results .
namely , when an appropriate cutoff and extrapolation are applied to @xmath0 , the usual kk transform of eq .
( 6 ) gave @xmath10 spectra which agreed very well with those directly obtained from the wide range @xmath9 .
a limitation of the present method is , as already mentioned above , it can give correct @xmath10 only below certain photon energy ( 1.5 ev in the case of prru@xmath11p@xmath12 ) .
hence this method is useful when the temperature and pressure dependences of @xmath0 is limited to below certain energy .
in addition , to use the present method , it is required that @xmath9 is known over a wide enough photon energy range , since @xmath22 and @xmath23 must be obtained from @xmath9 with the usual kk analysis .
while a mathematically rigorous justification of the proposed method is beyond the scope of this work , this method may be very useful as a simple analysis technique of reflectance spectra measured under high pressure with dac .
this work has been done as a part of high pressure infrared studies of strongly correlated electron materials using synchrotron radiation at spring-8 , under the approval by jasri ( 2009a0089 through 2011b0089 ) .
the @xmath9 data used in figs .
1 and 2 have been already published @xcite , in collaboration with m. matsunami , l. chen , m. takimoto , t. nanba , c. sekine , and i. shirotani . | infrared ir spectroscopy microscopic carrier dynamics electronic structures in correlated electron materials rare earth transition metal organic compounds performed under high pressure using diamond anvil cell ( dac ) correlated materials show physical properties under high pressure in diamond anvils thin metal gasket seal sample pressure transmitting medium typical diameter diamond surface 0.8 mm 10 gpa 0.6 mm 20 gpa sample should dimensions 100 @xmath4 m infrared reflectance study synchrotron radiation ( sr ) used as source of far mid - infrared high pressure ir spectroscopy with dac major applications of ir - sr reflectance measured between sample / diamond interface sample vacuum air normal - incidence reflectance of sample relative to transparent medium refractive index @xmath5 given by fresnel s formula as @xcite @xmath7 is complex refractive index sample @xmath5=2.4 for diamond 1.0 for vacuum denote @xmath8 at sample / diamond interface as @xmath0 sample / vacuum interface as @xmath9 @xmath0 of sample measured in dac may be different from @xmath9 study kramers - kronig analysis @xmath0 data dac analysis used optical constants refractive index dielectric function optical conductivity from measured @xmath9 spectrum @xcite difference between @xmath9 @xmath0 kk analysis method applied to @xmath0 @xcite constants previous studies used drude - lorentz spectral fitting or modified kk transform different method kk transform cutoff to @xmath0 infrared @xmath10 from @xmath0 validity demonstrated with measured reflectance data of@xmath11p@xmath12 complex reflectivity electric field @xmath13 expressed as @xcite @xmath14 @xmath15 root of reflectance @xmath8 measured in experiments real imaginary parts of @xmath16 expressed @xmath17 @xmath18 as @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 derived from @xmath15 kk analysis @xmath22 @xmath23 derived by setting @xmath5=2.4 in eqs 2 3 ) imaginary part complex dielectric function as @xmath24 optical conductivity as @xmath25performing kk analysis on reflectance data logarithm of @xmath13 @xmath26 complex response function sample / vacuum reflection kk relation between @xmath27 and @xmath21 expressed as @xcite @xmath28 @xmath29 principal value required @xmath30 no poles in upper complex @xmath31 plane when @xmath32 finite correct since @xmath33 when @xmath34 @xmath5=1 @xmath35 @xmath36 may satisfied on upper imaginary axis @xcite point denoted as @xmath37 @xmath38 real positive finite number @xmath36 @xmath39 @xmath40 pole at @xmath37 kk relation modified to @xcite @xmath41. presence of medium with @xmath35 brings extra phase shift into kk relation extra phase shift decreasing function of @xmath42 original kk relation recovered when @xmath43 @xcite theoretical considerations on extra phase shift reported @xcite precise value of @xmath38 not known estimated from experimental @xmath0 data dl fitting modified kk transform @xcite uses eq .7 @xmath44 value @xmath38 @xmath10 fitting @xmath0 if frequency range lower than @xmath38 effects extra phase minor kk transform eq @xmath5=2.4 eqs 3 4 give accurate values optical constants examine validity next section use @xmath9 spectra measured prru@xmath11p@xmath12 @xcite compound metal - to - insulator transition at 60 k @xcite energy gap @xmath10 previous work use @xmath9 at 60 k metal 9 k ( insulator ) photon energy range 0.008 - 30 ev @xcite blue curve figs . 1(a 2(a ) reflectance spectrum prru@xmath11p@xmath12 measured 60 k vacuum @xcite @xmath0 dac calculated from @xmath9 green red blue curves @xmath45 extrapolations cutoff energies @xmath46=1.5 , 2 5 ev optical conductivity @xmath47 ) analysis @xmath9 compared analysis @xmath0 cutoff @xmath46=1.5 , 2 5 ev @xmath45 extrapolations above below 1.5 ev @xmath10 @xmath0 with @xmath46=2 ev agrees @xmath9procedure full @xmath9 spectrum analyzed with eq 6 ) obtain @xmath22 substituted into eq 1 ) with @xmath5=2.4 to derive @xmath0 expected in dac @xmath0 obtained used with kk transform of eq 6 ) @xmath5=2.4 in eqs 3 ) 4 ) to obtain @xmath22 cutoff extrapolation to @xmath0 if kk analysis on @xmath0 works resulting @xmath10 from iii ) should agree with @xmath9 usual kk analysis examine 60 k data expected @xmath0 at 60 k obtained indicated by black curve in fig . 1(a ) @xmath9 spectrum extrapolated below 0.008 ev above 30 ev with hagen - rubens @xmath45 functions @xmath0 shows high values above 4 ev unrealistic feature from assumption of constant @xmath5=2.4 in spectral range refractive index of diamond constant near band gap shows strong light absorption @xmath34 @xmath48 @xmath50 must hold like other material before kk transform iii ) @xmath0 in fig 1(a ) cut off @xmath46 extrapolated with @xmath45 values @xmath46 tried fig . kk transform of eq . 6 ) get @xmath21 used derive @xmath22 @xmath23 with @xmath5=2.4 eqs 3 4 ) obtain @xmath10 figure 1(b ) shows @xmath10 spectra obtained different values @xmath46 obtained @xmath10 spectra depend on @xmath46 @xmath46=2.0 ev resulting @xmath10 below 1.5 ev agrees with original @xmath9 @xmath46=2.2 ev best agreement=2.0 ev data 2.2 data overlaps with @xmath9 difficult distinguish result 9 k data sample insulator semiconductor shown in fig . 2 good agreement between @xmath10 from full @xmath9 @xmath0 with @xmath46=2 ev spectral range agreement below 1.5 ev similar to 60 k data both 9 k 60 k data show good agreement with value @xmath46= 2 ev spectral change in @xmath0 below 1.5 ev @xmath10 obtained by present method high pressure studies - @xmath0 usually measured below 1 - 2 ev above high energy limit @xmath0 measurement @xmath0 expected from @xmath9 connected to measured @xmath0 cutoff extrapolation connected @xmath0 transformed obtain @xmath10 pressure temperature - induced changes of @xmath0 limited below energy 1.5 ev for prru@xmath11p@xmath12 figs 1 2 met in high pressure data @xmath10 under pressure up to 14 gpa method reflectance spectrum of measured at 9 k in vacuum @xmath0 expected dac calculated from @xmath9 green red light blue curves are @xmath45 extrapolations with cutoff energies @xmath46=1.5 2 5 ev optical conductivity @xmath47 ) with analysis @xmath9 compared with @xmath0 cutoff at @xmath46=1.5 2 5 ev @xmath45 extrapolations above similar simulations for other compounds metals insulators measured data obtained similar results appropriate cutoff extrapolation applied to @xmath0 kk transform gave @xmath10 spectra with from wide range @xmath9limitation present method correct @xmath10 below certain photon energy ( 1.5 ev@xmath11p@xmath12 method useful when temperature pressure dependences @xmath0 limited below certain energy required @xmath9 known wide photon energy range @xmath22 @xmath23 obtained from @xmath9 usual kk analysis mathematically justification method beyond useful analysis reflectance spectra high pressure dac work part high pressure infrared studies correlated electron materials synchrotron radiation spring-8 approval jasri ( 2009a0089 through 2011b0089 @xmath9 data figs . 1 2 published @xcite with m. matsunami l. chen m takimoto t nanba sekine i. shirotani | 0.506901 | 3,470 | 1,861 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,845 | we present updated results on the calculation of the matrix elements for @xmath0 in the quenched approximation on a @xmath1 lattice at @xmath2 , using an @xmath3-improved fermion action .
the scaling behaviours of the form factors @xmath4 and @xmath5 for the decay are examined and pole model ansatzes tested . | theoretical interest in the rare decay @xmath6 as a test of the standard model has been renewed by the experimental results of the cleo collaboration @xcite .
the viability of calculating the relevant hadronic matrix elements on the lattice was first demonstrated by bernard , hsieh and soni @xcite in 1991 .
the computational details and results of this work have been described in references @xcite and @xcite .
the hadronic matrix elements can be parametrised by three form factors , @xmath7 where , @xmath8 and @xmath9 is the momentum of the emitted photon .
as the photon emitted is on - shell , the form factors need to be evaluated at @xmath10 . in this limit ,
@xmath11 and the coefficient of @xmath12 is zero in the on - shell matrix element .
hence , the branching ratio can be expressed in terms of a single form factor , for example @xmath4 .
we calculate with a selection of quark masses near the charm mass and extrapolate to the @xmath13-quark scale . in the heavy quark limit ,
heavy quark symmetry @xcite tells us that , @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the pseudoscalar mass . combining this with the relation @xmath16 constrains the @xmath17 dependence of the form factors
however , it does not provide a scaling law for @xmath4 without further assumptions about the actual @xmath17 behaviour of the form factors .
pole dominance ideas suggest that , @xmath18 for @xmath19 , where @xmath20 is a mass that is equal to @xmath15 plus @xmath21 corrections and @xmath22 is a power . since @xmath23 for large @xmath15
, the combination of heavy quark symmetry and the form factor relation at @xmath10 implies that @xmath24 .
for example , @xmath25 could be a constant and @xmath26 a single pole , or @xmath25 could be a single pole and @xmath26 a double pole .
these two cases correspond to , @xmath27 the data appear visually to favour @xmath25 constant in @xmath17 when @xmath15 is around the charm scale .
however , we will consider both constant and single pole behaviours for @xmath25 below .
as demonstrated in a previous paper @xcite , the evaluation of @xmath28 is relatively straightforward , and @xmath29 can be determined in a similar way .
we fit @xmath26 to a pole or dipole model in order to obtain the on - shell form factor @xmath4 , @xmath30 the difference between the two models was found to be negligible .
the form factor @xmath29 was fitted to a pole model or constant the ratio @xmath31 at @xmath10 for dipole / pole and pole / constant fits is shown in fig.([fig : ratio ] ) .
the magnitude is found to be consistent with 1 at low masses , in accordance with the identity @xmath32 , eq.([eq : t1_t2_equal ] ) . at higher masses ,
the dipole / pole fits for @xmath31 deviate less than the pole / constant fits .
in order to test heavy quark scaling , we also extracted the form factor @xmath29 at maximum recoil , where @xmath34 , in the same way as bernard _ et al .
_ @xcite . in the heavy quark limit
, @xmath5 is expected to scale as @xmath35 , analogous to the scaling of @xmath36 .
higher order @xmath21 and radiative corrections will also be present . for convenience ,
we remove the leading scaling behaviour by forming the quantity , @xmath37 the normalisation ensures that @xmath38 at the physical mass @xmath33 .
linear and quadratic correlated fits for @xmath39 were carried out with the functions , @xmath40 and are shown in fig.([fig : t2-extrapolation ] ) .
taking the quadratic fit of @xmath29 at @xmath41 as the best estimate , and the difference between the central values of the linear and quadratic fits as an estimate of the sytematic error , @xmath29 was found to be , @xmath42 if the @xmath17 dependence of @xmath29 at @xmath33 were known , this result could be related to @xmath4 via the identity @xmath32 .
for @xmath4 we test the two possible scaling laws in the same way as for @xmath29 , by forming the quantity , @xmath43 where @xmath44 . for @xmath45 , a similar scaling relationship has been found using light - cone sum rules by ali , braun and simma @xcite .
the @xmath46 case has been suggested by other sum rules calculations @xcite .
linear and quadratic fits were carried out with the same functions as for @xmath29 .
the two cases @xmath44 are shown in fig.([fig : t1-extrapolation ] ) .
the @xmath47 are approximately 1 for the scaling laws , indicating that the models are statistically valid in the available mass range .
the final results for @xmath48 are taken from the quadratic fit for @xmath49 , with the systematic error estimated as for @xmath29 , @xmath50
further information on the @xmath17 dependence of @xmath49 and @xmath29 is required to remove the uncertainty in obtaining the form factors at the physical point @xmath10 , @xmath51 . | interest in rare decay @xmath6 standard model renewed by results cleo collaboration @xcite calculating hadronic matrix elements on lattice demonstrated by bernard hsieh soni @xcite 1991 computational details results described in references @xcite hadronic matrix elements parametrised by three form factors @xmath7 momentum emitted photon on - shell form factors evaluated at @xmath10 @xmath11 coefficient @xmath12 zero in on - shell matrix branching ratio expressed single form factor @xmath4 calculate with quark masses near charm mass extrapolate to @xmath13-quark scale heavy quark limit symmetry @xmath14 @xmath15 pseudoscalar mass relation @xmath16 constrains @xmath17 dependence form factors scaling law for @xmath4 without assumptions behaviour pole dominance ideas suggest @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 equal to @xmath15 plus @xmath21 corrections @xmath22 power @xmath23 @xmath15 heavy quark symmetry form factor relation at @xmath10 implies @xmath24 @xmath25 constant single pole single double polecases correspond @xmath27 data favour @xmath25 constant @xmath17 @xmath15 around charm scale consider constant single pole behaviours for @xmath25 evaluation @xmath28 straightforward @xmath29 determined fit @xmath26 to pole dipole model on - shell form factor difference negligible form factor @xmath29 fitted to pole model constant ratio @xmath31 at @xmath10 for dipole / pole pole / constant fits shown in fig. magnitude consistent with 1 at low masses @xmath32 higher masses dipole / pole fits @xmath31 deviate less than pole / constant test heavy quark scaling extracted form factor @xmath29 at maximum recoil @xmath34 heavy quark limit @xmath5 scale as @xmath35 @xmath36 higher order @xmath21 radiative corrections present remove leading scaling behaviour forming quantity @xmath37 normalisation ensures @xmath38 at physical mass @xmath33 linear quadratic correlated fits for @xmath39 carried out with functions @xmath40 shown in fig.quadratic fit @xmath29 at @xmath41 best estimate difference central values linear quadratic fits sytematic error @xmath29 @xmath42 @xmath17 dependence @xmath29 at @xmath33 known result related to @xmath4 @xmath32 @xmath4 two scaling laws forming quantity @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 similar scaling relationship found light - cone sum rules @xmath46 case suggested by sum rules calculations linear quadratic fits same functions @xmath29 two cases @xmath44 shown in fig. @xmath47 approximately 1 for scaling laws models statistically valid mass range final results @xmath48 from quadratic fit @xmath49 systematic error estimated @xmath29 @xmath50 information @xmath17 dependence @xmath49 @xmath29 required uncertainty form factors physical point @xmath10, @xmath51 | 0.183861 | 1,214 | 634 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,846 | white dwarfs are almost completely degenerate objects that can not obtain energy from the thermonuclear sources and their evolution is just a gravothermal process of cooling .
the simplicity of these objects , the fact that the physical inputs necessary to understand them are well identified , although not always well understood , and the impressive observational background about white dwarfs make them the most well studied galactic population .
these characteristics allow to use them as laboratories to test new ideas of physics . in this contribution
we discuss the robustness of the method and its application to the axion case . | white dwarfs are almost completely degenerate objects that can not obtain energy from the thermonuclear sources and their evolution is just a gravothermal process of cooling . globally
, the evolution of the luminosity of a white dwarf can be written as : @xmath0 where the l.h.s .
of this equation represents the sinks of energy , photons , neutrinos and any additional exotic term , while the r.h.s . contains the sources of energy , the heat capacity of the star , the work due to the change of volume , the contribution of the latent heat and gravitationl settling upon crystallization ( the term @xmath1 is the rate of crystallization ) and , finally , the last term represents any additional exotic source of energy @xcite .
there are two ways to test the theory of white dwarf evolution , namely , studying the white dwarf luminosity function and using the secular drift of the pulsation period of variable white dwarfs . during the cooling process , white dwarfs experience some phases of pulsational instability powered by the @xmath2- and the _ convective driven_-mechanisms @xcite .
depending on the composition of the atmosphere variable white dwarfs are known as dov , dbv and dav .
these stars also known as pg1159 or gw vir stars , v777 he stars and zz ceti stars respectively .
variable white dwarfs of different compositions occupy different regions in the hertzsprung russell diagram .
the value of the pulsation period indicates that these objects are experiencing g
mode non radial pulsations , where the main restoring force is gravity .
one of the main characteristics of these pulsations is that they experience a secular drift caused by the evolution of the temperature and radius . for qualitative purposes
this drift can be approximated by @xcite : @xmath3 where @xmath4 and @xmath5 are constants of the order of unity that depend on the details of the model , and @xmath6 and @xmath7 are the stellar radius and the temperature at the region of period formation , respectively .
this equation reflects the fact that , as the star cools down , the degeneracy of the plasma increases , the buoyancy decreases , the brunt - visl frequency becomes smaller and , as a consequence , the spectrum of pulsations gradually shifts to lower frequencies . at the same time , since the star contracts , the radius decreases and the frequency tends to increase . in general , dav and dbv stars
are already so cool ( and degenerate ) that the radial term is negligible and the change of the period of pulsation can be directly related to the change in the core temperature of the star .
the timescales involved are of the order of @xmath8 s / s for dovs , @xmath9 to @xmath10 s / s for dbvs and @xmath11 to @xmath12 s / s for davs .
therefore , the measurement of such drifts provides an effective method to test the theory of cooling white dwarfs .
this measurement is a difficult but feasible task , as it has been already proved in the case of g117b15a , a zz ceti star @xcite .
these properties allow to build a simple relationship @xcite to estimate the influence of an extra sink of energy , axions for instance , on the period drift of variable white dwarfs : @xmath13 where the suffix `` model '' refers to those models built using standard physics .
the white dwarf luminosity function is defined as the number density of white dwarfs of a given luminosity per unit of magnitude interval : @xmath14 where @xmath15 satisfies the condition @xmath16 and @xmath17 , @xmath18 is the mass of the parent star ( for convenience all white dwarfs are labeled with the mass of the main sequence progenitor ) , @xmath19 is the cooling time down to luminosity @xmath20 , @xmath21 is the characteristic cooling time , @xmath22 and @xmath23 are the maximum and the minimum masses of the main sequence stars able to produce a white dwarf of luminosity @xmath20 , @xmath24 is the lifetime of the progenitor of the white dwarf , and @xmath7 is the age of the population under study .
the remaining quantities , the initial mass function , @xmath25 , and the star formation rate , @xmath26 , are not known a priori and depend on the properties of the stellar population under study .
the computed luminosity function is usually normalized to the bin with the smallest error bar , traditionally the one with @xmath27 , in order to compare theory with observations .
equation ( [ lf ] ) shows that in order to use the luminosity function as a physical laboratory it is necessary to have good enough observational data and to know the galactic properties that are used in this equation ( the star formation rate , the initial mass function and the age of the galaxy ) .
fortunately , the bright branch of the luminosity function is only sensitive to the average characteristic cooling time of white dwarfs at the corresponding luminosity when the function is properly normalized .
the reason is twofold @xcite , on one hand the stellar population is dominated by low mass stars and on the other the lifetime of stars increases very sharply when the mass decreases .
the result is that the old galactic populations are still producing bright white dwarfs and the number of such stars at each luminosity bin is the sum of the contributions of all the different episodes of star formation . ) by a 0.6 @xmath28 white dwarf versus its bolometric magnitude , a function that monotonically increases with time .
the cross represents the position of g115-b15a.,scaledwidth=60.0% ]
we note that in white dwarf case only dfsz axions have to be taken into account , since electron bremsstrahlung is the dominant process in white dwarf interiors .
the axion emission rate under these conditions is given by @xcite : @xmath29 where @xmath30 takes into account the coulomb plasma effects , @xmath31 is the temperature in units of @xmath32 k , @xmath33 and @xmath34 are the atomic and mass numbers of the plasma components , respectively , and @xmath35 is the strength of the axion - electron yukawa coupling .
figure [ fig : lum ] shows the energy losses of a typical white dwarf star . since the neutrino emission is @xmath36 and @xmath37 the luminosity function allows to disentangle the contribution of the different mechanisms of energy loss . when this method is applied to the luminosity function of white dwarfs the value of @xmath38 that best fits the luminosity function
is @xmath39 , but variations of a factor two are still compatible with the observations @xcite .
finally , the most recent analysis of g117-b15a shows that the value of @xmath38 quoted here is compatible with the secular drift of the pulsation period , which gives support to the necessity to include an extra cooling term in the white dwarf models @xcite .
there are two independent evidences , the luminosity function and the secular drift of dav white dwarfs , that these stars are cooling down more rapidly than predicted .
the introduction of an additional sink of energy linked to the interaction of electrons with a light boson ( axion , alp , ) with an strength @xmath40 solves the problem satisfactorily .
of course , the remaining uncertainties , both observational and theoretical , still prevent to claim the existence of such interaction .
a direct detection under laboratory conditions , like those of the cast helioscope @xcite or the shining through the wall experiments @xcite , could provide unambiguous evidences . in this sense , if the current result is interpreted as due to axions , such particles should have a mass , @xmath41 and should be coupled with photons with @xmath42 gev@xmath43 .
this work has been supported by the micinn grants aya08 - 1839/esp and aya2008 - 04211-c02 - 01 , by the esf eurocores program eurogenesis ( micinn grant eui2009 - 04170 ) , by sgr grants of the generalitat de catalunya and by the eu - feder funds .
99 j. isern , e. garca - berro , m. hernanz , & r. mochkovitch , `` the physics of white dwarfs '' , jour .
phys . cond
. matter , * 10 * , 11263 ( 1998 ) l.g .
althaus , a.h .
crsico , j. isern , & e. garca - berro , `` evolutionary and pulsational properties of white dwarfs '' , astron . &
, in press ( 2010 ) d.e .
winget , c. j. hansen , & h. m. van horn , `` do pulsating pg1159 - 035 stars put constraints on stellar evolution ? '' ,
nature , * 303 * , 781 ( 1983 ) s.o . kepler _ et al .
_ , `` measuring the evolution of the most stable optical clock g117-b15a '' , astrophys .
, * 634 * , 1311 ( 2005 ) j. isern , m. hernanz , & e. garca - berro , `` axion cooling of white dwarfs '' , astrophys .
, * 392 * , l23 ( 1992 ) j. isern , & e. garca - berro , `` white dwarfs as physics laboratories : the axion case '' , mem . soc . astr . it .
, * 79 * , 545 ( 2008 ) j. isern , s. cataln , e. garca - berro , & s. torres , `` axions and the white dwarf luminosity function '' , j. phys . : conf . ser . ,
* 172 * , 012005 ( 2009 ) m. nakagawa , y. kohyama , & n. itoh , `` axion bremsstrahlung in dense stars '' , astrophys .
, * 322 * , 291 ( 1987 ) j. isern , e. garca - berro , s. torres , & s. cataln , `` axions and the cooling of white dwarf stars '' , astrophys . jour . , * 682 * , l109 ( 2008 ) j. isern , e. garca - berro , l.g . althaus , & a.h .
crsico , `` axions and the pulsation periods of variable white dwarfs revisited '' , astron . & astrophys . , * 512 * , a86 ( 2010 ) t. papaevangelou , `` cast , recent results results and future outlook '' , http : + axion-wimp.desy.de and these proceedings .
p. arias , j. jaeckel , j. redondo , a. ringwald `` improving the discovery potential of future light - shining - through - the - wall experiments '' , aerxiv:1009.1519 [ hep - ph ] , http : + axion-wimp.desy.de and these proceedings . | white dwarfs degenerate obtain energy from thermonuclear sources evolution gravothermal process cooling evolution luminosity white dwarf written as @xmath0 l.h.s . represents energy photons neutrinos additional exotic term r.h.s . contains sources energy heat capacity work change volume latent heat gravitationl crystallization @xmath1 rate crystallization last term represents additional exotic source energy @xcite two ways test theory white dwarf evolution studying luminosity function secular drift of pulsation period white dwarfs during cooling dwarfs experience pulsational instability powered by @xmath2- convective driven-mechanisms @xcite variable white dwarfs known as dov dbv dav pg1159 gw vir stars v777 he stars zz ceti stars occupy different regions in hertzsprung russell diagram value pulsation period indicates g mode non radial pulsations main restoring force gravity pulsations secular drift caused by evolution temperature radiusdrift approximated by @xcite @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 constants on details model @xmath6 @xmath7 stellar radius temperature at region period formation equation reflects star cools degeneracy plasma increases buoyancy decreases brunt - visl frequency smaller spectrum pulsations shifts to lower frequencies star contracts radius decreases frequency dav dbv stars cool degenerate radial term negligible change period pulsation related to core temperature timescales @xmath8 s / s for dovs @xmath9 to @xmath10 s / s for dbvs @xmath11 to @xmath12 s / s for davs measurement of drifts theory of cooling white dwarfs measurement difficult feasible proved in g117b15a zz ceti star @xcite properties allow simple relationship estimate influence extra sink of energy on period drift of variable white dwarfs : @xmath13 suffix `` model '' refers to models standard physicswhite dwarf luminosity function defined as number density of white dwarfs given luminosity per unit magnitude interval : @xmath14 @xmath15 satisfies condition mass of parent star labeled main progenitor @xmath19 cooling time down to luminosity characteristic cooling time maximum minimum masses of main sequence stars produce white dwarf luminosity lifetime of progenitor @xmath7 age of population under study remaining quantities initial mass function star formation rate not known depend on properties stellar population under study computed luminosity function normalized to bin with smallest error bar @xmath27 to compare theory with observations equation shows to use luminosity function necessary good observational data know galactic properties star formation rate initial mass function age galaxy bright branch of luminosity function sensitive to average characteristic cooling time of white dwarfs at luminosity when properly normalized stellar population dominated by low mass stars lifetime of stars increases when mass decreases old galactic populations producing bright white dwarfs number of stars at each luminosity bin is sum of contributions of different episodes of star formation0.6 @xmath28 white dwarf versus bolometric magnitude increases with time cross represents position of g115-b15a,scaledwidth=60.0% white dwarf case dfsz axions electron bremsstrahlung dominant axion emission rate by @xcite : @xmath29 @xmath30 coulomb plasma effects @xmath31 temperature units @xmath32 k @xmath33 @xmath34 atomic mass numbers plasma components @xmath35 strength axion - electron yukawa coupling figure shows energy losses white dwarf star neutrino emission @xmath36 and @xmath37 luminosity function disentangle mechanisms energy loss luminosity function white value @xmath38 best fits luminosity function is @xmath39 variations factor two compatible with observations @xcite analysis of g117-b15a shows value @xmath38 compatible with secular drift pulsation period extra cooling term in white dwarf models two evidences luminosity function secular drift white dwarfs stars cooling down more rapidly introduction additional sink of energy to interaction electrons with light boson strength @xmath40 solves problem remaining uncertainties observational prevent claim existence interactiondirect detection under laboratory conditions like cast helioscope shining wall experiments could provide unambiguous evidences if current result due to axions particles should have mass @xmath41 coupled with photons @xmath42 work supported by micinn grants aya08 - 1839/esp aya2008 - 04211-c02 - esf eurocores program eurogenesis micinn grant - 04170 sgr grants generalitat de catalunya eu - feder funds j. isern garca - berro hernanz mochkovitch physics of white dwarfs . matter 11263 ( 1998 ) evolutionary pulsational properties of white dwarfs 2010 winget hansen horn pulsating pg1159 - 035 stars stellar evolution ? nature 303 781 ( 1983 ) kepler measuring evolution of stable optical clock g117-b15a astrophys . 634 1311 ( 2005 ) j isern hernanz garca - berro axion cooling of white dwarfs astrophys . 392 l23 ( 1992 )garca - berro white dwarfs physics laboratories axion case soc . astr . 79 545 ( 2008 ) j isern cataln torres axions white dwarf luminosity function j. . conf 172 012005 2009 ) nakagawa kohyama n. itoh axion bremsstrahlung dense stars astrophys . 322 291 ( 1987 ) isern axions cooling white dwarf stars astrophys . jour. 682 l109 ( 2008 ) isern garca - berro althaus crsico axions pulsation periods white dwarfs revisited astron . astrophys . 512 * a86 ( 2010 ) papaevangelou cast recent results future outlook axion-wimp.desy.de p. arias j. jaeckel j. redondo a. ringwald improving discovery potential future light - shining wall experiments aerxiv:1009.1519 axion-wimp.desy.de | 0.356986 | 2,453 | 1,233 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,850 | the motion of a classical pendulum in a gravitational field of strength @xmath0 is explored .
the complex trajectories as well as the real ones are determined .
if @xmath0 is taken to be imaginary , the hamiltonian that describes the pendulum becomes @xmath1-symmetric .
the classical motion for this @xmath1-symmetric hamiltonian is examined in detail .
the complex motion of this pendulum in the presence of an external periodic forcing term is also studied . | many papers have been written on @xmath1-symmetric quantum - mechanical hamiltonians . in nearly all cases these hamiltonians
have had rising potentials and energies that are all discrete and _ real_. an example of such a class of hamiltonians is @xcite @xmath2 in a few instances quantum - mechanical hamiltonians having real continuous spectra have been examined @xcite .
for the case of @xmath1-symmetric quantum - mechanical hamiltonians having discrete spectra , the associated classical - mechanical systems have also been studied @xcite .
it has been found that the classical trajectories associated with real energies are @xmath1-symmetric ( they are symmetric under reflection about the imaginary axis ) and exhibit remarkably interesting topological properties .
these trajectories can visit multiple sheets of a riemann surface .
however , the classical mechanics associated with quantum systems having continuous spectra have not yet been examined .
thus , in this paper we explore the classical trajectories of the periodic potential analyzed in ref .
@xcite .
consider a classical - mechanical system consisting of a simple pendulum with a bob of mass @xmath3 and a string of length @xmath4 in a uniform gravitational field of magnitude @xmath0 ( see fig .
the gravitational potential energy of the system is defined to be zero at the height of the pivot point of the string .
the pendulum bob swings through an angle @xmath5 .
therefore , the horizontal and vertical cartesian coordinates @xmath6 and @xmath7 are given by @xmath8 which gives velocities @xmath9 we define the potential and kinetic energies @xmath10 and @xmath11 as @xmath12 the hamiltonian @xmath13 for the pendulum is therefore @xmath14 without loss of generality we set @xmath15 and @xmath16 , and for consistency with the notation used in earlier papers on @xmath1-symmetric hamiltonians we relabel @xmath17 to get @xmath18 where @xmath19 .
the classical equations of motion for this hamiltonian read @xmath20 the hamiltonian @xmath21 for this system is a constant of the motion and thus the energy @xmath22 is a time - independent quantity . for most of this paper
we take @xmath22 to be real because the energy levels of the corresponding quantum - mechanical system are real .
this paper is organized as follows : in sec . [ s2 ] we study the complex trajectories for @xmath21 in ( [ e6 ] ) when @xmath22 and @xmath0 are real . in sec .
[ s3 ] we study the complex trajectories for @xmath21 when @xmath22 is real but @xmath0 is imaginary . in sec .
[ s4 ] we examine briefly the complex chaotic motion that results when the energy @xmath22 of the pendulum is allowed to be complex and also when the pendulum is subject to a periodic external driving force .
in this section we examine the solutions to hamilton s equations ( [ e7 ] ) for the case in which the gravitational field strength @xmath0 is real . without loss of generality
we take @xmath23 .
there are three cases to consider : ( 1 ) the complex closed trajectories that result when @xmath24 , ( 2 ) the complex open trajectories that occur when @xmath25 , and ( 3 ) the complex closed trajectories that we obtain when @xmath26 .
when the energy @xmath22 of a simple pendulum lies in the range @xmath27 , the physically observed motion is that of a swinging pendulum . for the example considered in this subsection
we choose @xmath28 .
since a _ classical turning point _
@xmath29 is the solution to the equation @xmath30 , the classical turning points for this case satisfy @xmath31 .
thus , @xmath32 the observed classical trajectory for this pendulum is represented by @xmath33 on the real-@xmath34 axis .
this trajectory oscillates on the real axis between the turning points at @xmath35 .
however , the full array of complex solutions to the classical equations of motion is much richer ( see fig .
[ f2 ] ) . in this figure
we see that all classical trajectories are closed and periodic and lie in cells of width @xmath36 that fill the entire complex-@xmath34 plane . as a consequence of cauchy s theorem ,
all of the closed orbits have exactly the same period ; namely , the period of a real physical pendulum that undergoes periodic motion on the real axis .
this is because the period @xmath11 for a particle of energy @xmath22 for a hamiltonian of the form @xmath37 is given in terms of a closed complex contour integral : @xmath38}$ ] , where @xmath39 is the complex closed path of the particle . since the only singularity that @xmath39 encloses is the square - root branch cut joining the turning points , the value of @xmath11 is independent of @xmath39 .
note that the orbits in fig .
[ f2 ] that lie near the turning points are approximately elliptical and resemble the exactly elliptic complex trajectories of the simple harmonic oscillator , whose hamiltonian is @xmath40 .
these orbits are displayed in fig .
[ f3 ] .
when the energy @xmath22 of a simple pendulum is sufficiently large ( here , @xmath25 ) , the physically observed motion is that of a rotating pendulum .
the classical turning points for this case are no longer on the real axis because there are no real solutions to @xmath41 with @xmath25 .
the rotating pendulum has no real turning points because its real trajectory never turns back . to find the complex turning points , we replace @xmath29 by @xmath42 and get two equations : @xmath43 for the example considered in this subsection we choose @xmath44 , and
thus the turning points are situated at @xmath45 , where @xmath46 , and @xmath47 .
the complex trajectories for this case are shown in fig .
note that the trajectories fill the entire complex plane and that there are no closed orbits .
the turning points have a strong influence on the path of the complex pendulum bob .
the trajectories in the upper - half complex-@xmath34 plane , for example , go just below and veer around the turning points above the real axis .
the turning points seem to attract the trajectories in much the same way as was found in ref .
@xcite .
note that the trajectories that terminate at turning points run vertically off to complex infinity .
this feature is also a property of the hamiltonian @xmath48 , which was studied in detail in ref .
the complex trajectories for this hamiltonian are shown in fig .
there are three turning points , and the trajectory beginning at the turning point on the imaginary axis goes up the imaginary axis to infinity .
one may ask how long it takes for a particle beginning at a turning point , say , the turning point at @xmath49 , to reach infinity .
the time @xmath11 for this motion is represented by the following integral : @xmath50 a numerical evaluation of this integral gives @xmath51 .
thus , the particle reaches the point at complex infinity in a finite time .
there are no physically observable trajectories for this choice of the energy .
however , the complex trajectories in this case can be calculated numerically ( see fig . [ f6 ] ) and
we find that they are all closed orbits that lie in periodic cells of width @xmath36 .
the turning points come in complex - conjugate pairs . in fig .
[ f6 ] we have chosen @xmath52 and the turning points are situated at @xmath53 , where @xmath54 ( @xmath46 ) and @xmath47 .
if we take the gravitational field strength @xmath0 in ( [ e6 ] ) to be imaginary , the hamiltonian becomes @xmath1 symmetric , where @xmath55 reflection consists of @xmath56 .
setting @xmath57 , the hamiltonian becomes @xmath58 and the turning points are located at @xmath53 , where @xmath59 there are now two cases to consider , @xmath60 and @xmath61 . in fig .
[ f7 ] we take @xmath62 and find turning points at @xmath63 ( @xmath64 ) and in fig .
[ f8 ] we take @xmath65 and find turning points at @xmath66 ( @xmath67 ) . like the complex trajectories in fig .
[ f4 ] , the trajectories in these two figures are not closed and trajectories beginning at turning points run vertically off to infinity . in fig .
[ f7 ] one such trajectory is shown .
this trajectory begins at @xmath68 .
the time @xmath11 for a particle to travel from this turning point to infinity is given by @xmath69 after a simple change of variables this integral becomes @xmath70 where @xmath71 is the complete elliptic function .
thus , the classical particle reaches complex infinity in finite time .
there are a number of interesting ways to extend and generalize the investigations in the previous two sections . in figs .
[ f7 ] and [ f8 ] the energy for the pendulum in an imaginary gravitational field was taken to be real .
this is because a quantum - mechanical @xmath1-symmetric hamiltonian has the virtue of possessing real energy levels .
however , one might ask what happens if one takes the energy to be complex . in this case
the complex trajectories are not spatially or temporally periodic , even though the turning points _ are _ periodic and are separated horizontally by @xmath36 . the behavior of the trajectories is illustrated in fig .
[ f9 ] , where we have taken the energy to be @xmath72 .
another way to extend these investigations is to study what happens when there is an external periodic driving force of the form @xmath73 @xcite .
we have taken @xmath74 and @xmath75 and in figs .
[ f10 ] , [ f11 ] , and [ f12 ] we have examined the complex trajectories up to times @xmath76 , @xmath77 , and @xmath78 . the starting energy for these figures
is taken to be @xmath79 and the value of @xmath0 is @xmath80 .
the initial value of @xmath34 is taken to be @xmath81,which would lead to a complex trajectory if there were no driving term .
we see that for short times the trajectory is noisy , but seems to be confined to the central cell in fig .
however , after a sufficiently long time the trajectory wanders into adjacent cells , as can be seen in figs .
[ f11 ] and [ f12 ] .
this result suggests it might be productive to investigate complex trajectories of dynamical systems whose real trajectories exhibit chaos , especially in the @xmath1-symmetric case .
one could begin with the complex trajectories associated with real homoclinic chaos , as in the present case .
in addition , the rich behavior seen in the complex spatial trajectories of @xmath1-symmetric systems may be expected to be the projection onto the two - dimensional complex plane of interesting behavior in four - dimensional complex phase space .
for example , the phase - space trajectories of @xmath1-symmetric complex systems whose real parts are chaotic might exhibit a complex hamiltonian analog of arnold diffusion , or some other kind of hamiltonian diffusion .
we thank d. c. brody for many useful discussions .
cmb thanks the theoretical physics group at imperial college , london , for its hospitality . as an ulam scholar
, cmb receives financial support from the center for nonlinear studies at the los alamos national laboratory and he is supported in part by a grant from the u.s .
department of energy .
the work of ddh was supported by the royal society of london and by the u.s .
department of energy office of science applied mathematical research . p. j. holmes and j. e. marsden , j. math .
* 23 * , 669 ( 1982 ) .
s. h. strogatz , _ nonlinear dynamics and chaos : with applications to physics , biology , chemistry and engineering _ ( perseus , cambridge , massachusetts , 1994 ) . | papers written on @xmath1-symmetric quantum - mechanical hamiltonians rising potentials energies discrete real example is @xcite @xmath2 few hamiltonians real continuous spectra examined @xcite @xmath1-symmetric hamiltonians discrete spectra classical - mechanical systems studied @xcite classical trajectories real energies are @xmath1-symmetric interesting topological properties visit multiple sheets of riemann surface classical mechanics quantum systems continuous spectra not examined paper explore classical trajectories of periodic potential in @xcite classical - mechanical system simple pendulum bob mass @xmath3 string length @xmath4 in uniform gravitational field @xmath0 gravitational potential energy zero at height pivot point string pendulum swings through angle @xmath5 horizontal vertical cartesian coordinates @xmath6 @xmath7 given by @xmath8 velocities define potential kinetic energies @xmath10 @xmath11 as @xmath12 hamiltonian @xmath13 for pendulum is @xmath14 set @xmath15 and @xmath16 for consistency with relabel @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19classical equations of motion for hamiltonian @xmath20 @xmath21 constant energy @xmath22 time - independent paper take @xmath22 real energy levels quantum - mechanical system real paper organized s2 study complex trajectories for @xmath21 when @xmath22 @xmath0 real s3 study complex trajectories @xmath21 when @xmath22 real @xmath0 imaginary s4 examine complex chaotic motion when energy @xmath22 pendulum complex subject to periodic external driving force examine solutions to hamilton s equations e7 gravitational field strength @xmath0 real take @xmath23 three cases consider complex closed trajectories @xmath24 complex open trajectories @xmath25 complex closed trajectories @xmath26 energy @xmath22 pendulum in range @xmath27 observed motion swinging pendulum example choose @xmath28 classical turning point @xmath29 solution to equation @xmath30 classical turning points satisfy @xmath31 @xmath32 observed classical trajectory pendulum represented by @xmath33 on real-@xmath34 axis trajectory oscillates real axis between turning points at @xmath35 complex solutions to classical equations motion richer see fig . [ f2 ] classical trajectories closed periodic in cells width @xmath36 complex-@xmath34 plane cauchy s theorem closed orbits have same period pendulum periodic motion axis period @xmath11 particle energy @xmath22 hamiltonian form @xmath37 closed complex contour integral @xmath38 @xmath39 complex closed path particle singularity @xmath39 encloses square - root branch turning points value @xmath11 independent of @xmath39 orbits in fig . [ f2 near turning points elliptical resemble trajectories harmonic oscillator hamiltonian @xmath40 orbits displayed in fig . [ f3 ] energy @xmath22 of pendulum large @xmath25 motion rotating pendulum classical turning points no on real axis no solutions to @xmath41 with @xmath25 rotating pendulum no turning points trajectory never turns back complex turning points replace @xmath29 by @xmath42 two equations : @xmath43 @xmath44 turning points at @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 complex trajectories shown in fig .trajectories fill complex plane no closed orbits turning points on path complex pendulum bob trajectories in upper - half complex-@xmath34 plane veer around turning points above axis turning points attract trajectories same in ref . trajectories terminate at turning points run vertically to complex infinity property of hamiltonian @xmath48 studied in ref . complex trajectories shown in fig . three turning points trajectory beginning at imaginary axis up to infinity for particle at turning point @xmath49 to reach infinity time motion represented by integral : @xmath50 gives @xmath51 particle reaches complex infinity in finite time no physically observable trajectories for complex trajectories be calculated numerically all closed orbits in periodic cells of width @xmath36 turning points in complex - conjugate pairs in fig . f6 chosen @xmath52 turning points at @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath46 and @xmath47 gravitational field strength @xmath0 imaginary hamiltonian becomes @xmath1 symmetric @xmath55 reflection consists of @xmath56 setting @xmath57 hamiltonian becomes @xmath58 turning points at @xmath53 @xmath59 two cases @xmath60 and @xmath61 fig . f7 @xmath62 turning points at @xmath63 @xmath64 f8 @xmath65 turning points at @xmath66 ( @xmath67 ) complex trajectories f4 trajectories not closed turning points run vertically to infinity fig . f7 ] trajectory begins at @xmath68 time @xmath11 particle to infinity given by @xmath69 change variables integral becomes @xmath70 @xmath71 complete elliptic function classical particle reaches complex infinity in finite time extend generalize investigations figs f7 f8 energy pendulum in imaginary gravitational field real quantum - mechanical @xmath1-symmetric hamiltonian real energy levels energy complex complex trajectories not spatially or temporally periodic turning points periodic separated horizontally by @xmath36 behavior trajectories illustrated in fig . [ f9 ] taken energy @xmath72 extend investigations study external periodic driving force of form @xmath73 @xcite taken @xmath74 and @xmath75 figs f10 f11 f12 ] examined complex trajectories @xmath76 @xmath77 starting energy @xmath79 value @xmath0 @xmath80 initial value @xmath34 @xmath81 complex trajectory no driving term short times trajectory noisy confined to central cell fig . after long time wanders into adjacent cells figs f11 f12 result suggests investigate complex trajectories dynamical systems chaos especially @xmath1-symmetric case begin with complex trajectories homoclinic chaos rich behavior complex spatial trajectories @xmath1-symmetric systems projection behavior four - complex phase space phase - space trajectories @xmath1-symmetric systems chaotic might exhibit complex hamiltonian analog arnold diffusion thank d. c. brody for discussions cmb thanks theoretical physics group imperial college london hospitality ulam scholar cmb receives financial support from center for nonlinear studies los alamos national laboratory supported by grant u.s . department of energy work ddh supported by royal society of london u.s . department of energy office science applied mathematical research p. j. holmes j. e. marsden , j. math23 669 1982 ) strogatz nonlinear dynamics chaos applications physics biology chemistry engineering perseus cambridge massachusetts 1994 ) | 0.434807 | 2,666 | 1,385 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,860 | the @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction is recognized as one of the most important reaction for nova gamma
ray astronomy as it governs the early @xmath2 511 kev emission .
however , its rate remains largely uncertain at nova temperatures due to unknown low energy resonance strengths .
we report here on our last results concerning the study of the d(@xmath0f , p@xmath1n reaction , as well as on the determination of the @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction rate using the r - matrix theory .
remaining uncertainties are discussed . | gamma ray emission from classical novae is dominated , during the first hours , by positron annihilation following the beta decay of @xmath0f@xcite . however , even though it has been the object of many recent experiments@xcite the rate of its main mode of destruction , through the @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction , remains highly uncertain .
this was mainly due to the unknown proton widths of the first three @xmath3ne levels above the proton emission threshold ( @xmath4 , @xmath5 = 6.419 mev , 3/2@xmath6 ; 6.437 mev , 1/2@xmath7 and 6.449 mev , 3/2@xmath6 ) .
the tails of the corresponding resonances ( at respectively , @xmath8 = 8 , 26 and 38 kev ) can dominate the astrophysical s - factor in the relevant energy range@xcite . as a consequence of these nuclear uncertainties , the @xmath0f production in nova and the early gamma
ray emission was uncertain by a factor of @xmath9300@xcite .
since a direct measurement of the relevant resonance strengths is impossible due to the very low coulomb barrier penetrability , we used an indirect method aiming at determining the one nucleon spectroscopic factors in the analog levels of the mirror nucleus ( @xmath3f ) by the neutron transfer reaction d(@xmath0f , p)@xmath3f@xcite .
recently , the same reaction has been studied at higher energy@xcite .
we present here additional information on the extraction of spectroscopic factors as well as new @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction rates .
f excitation energy calibration spectrum with a global fit ( see text ) . the @xmath10 mev level is the most populated.,width=566 ] we refer to de srville et al.@xcite for experimental details and present in figure [ f : spect ] the reconstructed excitation energy spectrum .
the well populated @xmath3f levels at @xmath11 and 5.106 mev observed in single events as well as the @xmath12 mev group observed in coincidence events were used to make an internal calibration .
this procedure resulted in an uncertainty on the excitation energy calibration of @xmath13 kev in the region of interest . during this analysis a careful study of the systematic errors has been done . to extract the relative contribution of the two 3/2@xmath6 levels , a simultaneous fit of the 6.5 mev group ( @xmath14 = 6.497 + 6.528 mev ) , the 6.25 mev group ( @xmath14 = 6.255 + 6.282 + 6.330 mev ) and the 6.9 mev group ( @xmath14 = 6.787 + 6.838 + 6.891 mev ) was performed .
the background is described by a lorentzian of width @xmath15 = 280 kev corresponding to the @xmath16 @xmath17 6.429 mev .
the result favors the dominant contribution of one single level ( @xmath10 mev ) while another more recent study @xcite favors the other one . in any case ,
the nuclear structure of these two 3/2@xmath6 levels seem to be very different according to the results of an inelastic electron scattering measurement on @xmath3f @xcite . from the angular information of the 6.5 mev peak
, we have obtained the angular distribution that we have analyzed performing a finite range dwba analysis ( fresco@xcite code ) , including a compound nucleus component .
the extracted spectroscopic factor is @xmath18 ( 0.21 when neglecting the compound nucleus contribution@xcite ) and is weakly dependent of the optical potential parameters .
it is to be noted that our experiment has been recently repeated at higher energy@xcite and that a slightly lower spectroscopic factor is found ( @xmath19 ) .
before deriving a new @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction rate and because the previous analysis showed that the 3/2@xmath6 levels of interest _ can not _ be neglected , it seems important to focus on the remaining uncertainties .
first , the spectroscopic factors obtained correspond to @xmath3f levels and should be transposed to the analog @xmath3ne levels in order to deduced the proton widths used to calculate the reaction rate .
such a common practice in nuclear astrophysics leads to an uncertainty of a factor of about two on the proton widths ( based on a statistical study of analog states in the same mass region ) .
moreover , due to the small separation energy of this doublet ( only 30 kev ) , the assignation of analog levels is not very clear and in the following we will always deal with two cases : _ no inversion _ where the low energy level in @xmath3f is the analog of the low energy one in @xmath3ne and _ inversion _ where the low energy level in @xmath3f is the analog of the high energy one in @xmath3ne .
second , the @xmath20widths of the @xmath3ne levels are unknown and calculated from the reduced widths of the corresponding analog levels in @xmath3f . unlike the one nucleon case ( see above ) , the associated uncertainty could be as large as a factor of 10 @xcite .
third , the two @xmath21 levels of astrophysical interest can interfere with another @xmath21 level at @xmath22 mev and no information about the sign of interferences is available at present day . in case of destructive interference ,
the astrophysical s - factor decreases drastically in the gamow region at nova temperature .
ne levels @xmath23 and 7.076 mev ( dashed lines ) .
cases for different @xmath20width are reported .
( the 6.449 mev spectroscopic factor is from our experiment while data points are from bardayan et al.@xcite . ) .
solid lines represent the astrophysical s - factor used for the lower and upper @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction rate ( see text ) .
gamow windows for temperatures relevant to nova are shown.,width=566 ] figure [ f : taux ] is an example of the influence on the astrophysical s - factor of the @xmath20width variation when constructive and destructive interferences are considered between the two levels @xmath23 and 7.076 mev ( no inversion ) .
experimental data from bardayan et al.@xcite are also displayed .
these data points are used to constrain the astrophysical s - factor with the help of r - matrix fits ( anarki @xcite code ) .
the free parameters are the @xmath20width of the @xmath24 = 8 or 38 kev resonances , the proton width of the @xmath24 = 330 kev , the proton and @xmath20width and position of the @xmath24 = 665 kev resonance and the sign of the interferences .
the best fit is obtained for constructive interferences for the @xmath23 mev level and is then used for determining the new @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o nominal rate .
the upper reaction rate is given for a constructive interference for the @xmath25 mev ( inversion ) and an @xmath20width such as the astrophysical s - factor correspond to the upper limit of the error bar of the low energy data point from @xcite ( @xmath26 kev ) .
in the same way , the lower rate is given for a destructive interference for the @xmath23 mev ( no inversion ) and an @xmath20width such as the astrophysical s - factor correspond to the lower limit of the error bar at @xmath26 kev .
since we consider that the inversion of the analog levels is a possibility , the conclusions are the following .
the new nominal rate is within a factor of two of the former one @xcite . furthermore the upper rate is reduced and the global uncertainty is reduced but
remains large .
this work is based on experimental results obtained in collaboration with c. angulo , m. assuno , d. beaumel , b. bouzid , s. cherubini , m. couder , p. demaret , f. de oliveira santos , p. figuera , s. fortier , m. gaelens , f. hammache , j. kiener , d. labar , a. lefebvre schuhl , p. leleux , m. loiselet , a. ninane , s. ouichaoui , g. ryckewaert , n. smirnova , v. tatischeff and j .- p . thibaud . | gamma ray emission from novae dominated by positron annihilation beta decay of @xmath0f@xcite rate main destruction @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction remains uncertain due to unknown proton widths of first three @xmath3ne levels above emission threshold @xmath4 = 6.419 6.449 resonances @xmath8 = 8 26 38 kev ) dominate astrophysical s - factor in energy range @xmath0f production in nova early gamma ray emission uncertain by factor @xmath9300@xcite direct measurement resonance strengths impossible low coulomb barrier used indirect method one nucleon spectroscopic factors in analog levels mirror nucleus @xmath3f ) by neutron transfer reaction same reaction studied at higher energy@xcite additional information on extraction of spectroscopic factors new @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction rates excitation energy calibration spectrum @xmath10 mev level most populated refer to de srville et al.@xcite for details figure reconstructed excitation energy spectrumpopulated @xmath3f levels at 5.106 mev @xmath12 mev group used internal calibration resulted uncertainty excitation energy calibration of @xmath13 kev region study systematic errors relative contribution two 3/2@xmath6 levels simultaneous fit of 6.5 mev group 6.497 + 6.528 6.25 mev 6.255 + 6.282 6.330 6.9 mev 6.787 + 6.838 + 6.891 performed background described by lorentzian of width @xmath15 = 280 kev @xmath16 @xmath17 6.429 mev result favors dominant contribution one level @xmath10 mev favors other nuclear structure of two 3/2@xmath6 levels different inelastic electron scattering measurement on @xmath3f @xcite angular information 6.5 mev peak obtained angular distribution analyzed finite range dwba analysis compound nucleus component extracted spectroscopic factor is @xmath18 ( 0.21 dependent of optical potential parameters experiment repeated at higher energy@xcite lower spectroscopic factor found ( @xmath19 )deriving new @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction rate previous analysis showed 3/2@xmath6 levels interest be neglected important focus on remaining uncertainties spectroscopic factors correspond to @xmath3f levels transposed to analog @xmath3ne levels proton widths reaction rate leads to uncertainty two on proton widths small separation energy of doublet 30 kev assignation of analog levels not clear with two cases low energy level in @xmath3f analog of low energy @xmath3ne high energy @xmath3ne @xmath20widths of @xmath3ne levels unknown calculated from reduced widths of analog levels @xmath3f uncertainty could be large as factor of 10 @xcite two @xmath21 levels can interfere with another @xmath21 level at @xmath22 mev no information available destructive interference astrophysical s - factor decreases in gamow region at nova temperature levels @xmath23 and 7.076 mev cases for different @xmath20width reported 6.449 mev spectroscopic factor from our experiment data points from bardayan et al.@xcite lines represent astrophysical s - factor lower upper @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o reaction rate gamow windows for temperatures nova shown figure influence s - factor @xmath20width variation constructive destructive interferences between levels @xmath23 and 7.076 mev experimental data from bardayan et al.@xcite displayed constrain astrophysical s - factor r - matrix fits parameters @xmath20width @xmath24 = 8 or 38 kev resonances proton width = 330 kev proton @xmath20width position @xmath24 = 665 kev resonance sign of interferences best fit for constructive interferences @xmath23 mev level new @xmath0f(p,@xmath1o nominal rate upper reaction rate for constructive interference @xmath25 mev @xmath20width correspond upper limit error bar low energy data point @xcite @xmath26 kev lower rate for destructive interference @xmath23 mev lower limit error bar @xmath26 kev inversion of analog levels possibility conclusions new nominal rate within factor of two of former one @xcite upper rate reduced global uncertainty reduced remains largework based on experimental results with c. angulo assuno d beaumel bouzid cherubini couder demaret oliveira santos figuera fortier gaelens hammache j kiener d labar lefebvre schuhl leleux loiselet ninane s ouichaoui g ryckewaert smirnova v. tatischeff thibaud | 0.315528 | 2,010 | 1,021 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,863 | we have studied the vector to pseudoscalar conversion decay _ @xmath0 _ , with @xmath1 , with the kloe detector at da@xmath2ne .
the data set of 1.7 fb@xmath3 of @xmath4 collisions at @xmath5 contains a clear conversion decay signal of @xmath6 events from which we measured a value of @xmath7@xmath8@xmath9 .
the same sample is used to determine the transition form factor by a fit to the @xmath4 invariant mass spectrum , obtaining @xmath10@xmath11 , that improves by a factor of five the precision of the previous measurement and is in good agreement with vmd expectations . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , @xmath12 collisions , conversion decay , transition form factor 13.66.bc , 13.40.gp | we report the study of the vector to pseudoscalar conversion decay @xmath0 with @xmath13 . in conversion
decays , @xmath14 , the radiated photon is virtual and the squared dilepton invariant mass , @xmath15 , corresponds to the photon 4-momentum transferred , @xmath16 .
the probability of having a lepton pair of given invariant mass is determined by the electromagnetic dynamical structure of the transition @xmath17 .
the differential decay rate , normalized to the radiative width , is @xcite : @xmath18^{3/2},\,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath19 is the mass of the electron and @xmath20 , @xmath21 are the masses of the @xmath22 and @xmath23 mesons , respectively .
@xmath24 is the transition form factor , tff , that describes the coupling of the mesons to virtual photons and provides information on its nature and underlying structure .
the slope of the transition form factor , @xmath25 , is defined as : @xmath26 in the vector meson dominance model , vmd , the transition form factor is parametrized as : @xmath27 the vmd successfully describes some transitions , such as @xmath28 , while is failing for others , as in the case of @xmath29 @xcite .
recently , new models have been developed to overcome such a kind of discrepancies @xcite and they should be validated with the experimental data from other channels .
the only existing data on @xmath0 come from the snd @xcite and cmd-2 @xcite experiments .
their measurements of the branching ratio , br@xmath30 , are ( 1.19@xmath310.19@xmath310.07)@xmath32 and ( 1.14@xmath310.10@xmath310.06)@xmath32 , respectively .
the vmd expectation is br@xmath33 = 1.1@xmath32 @xcite .
the snd experiment has also measured the slope of the transition form factor from the @xmath34 invariant mass distribution , on the basis of 213 events : @xmath35= ( 3.8@xmath311.8 ) gev@xmath36 @xcite .
the vmd expectation is @xmath35=1 gev@xmath36 @xcite .
+ due to the large data sample , we have performed three different measurements : 1 . the determination of the branching fraction of the @xmath0 decay ; 2 . the direct measurement of the transition form factor slope b@xmath37 with a fit to the dilepton invariant mass spectrum ; 3 .
the extraction of the @xmath38 as a function of the dilepton invariant mass .
da@xmath2ne , the frascati @xmath22-factory , is an @xmath4 collider running at center of mass energy of @xmath39 mev .
positron and electron beams collide at an angle of @xmath40 - 25 mrad , producing @xmath22 mesons nearly at rest .
the kloe experiment operated at this collider from 2000 to 2006 , collecting 2.5 fb@xmath3 .
the kloe apparatus consists of a large cylindrical drift chamber surrounded by a lead - scintillating fiber electromagnetic calorimeter both inserted inside a superconducting coil , providing a 0.52 t axial field .
the beam pipe at the interaction region is a sphere with 10 cm radius , made of a 0.5 mm thick beryllium - aluminum alloy .
the drift chamber @xcite , 4 m in diameter and 3.3 m long , has 12,582 all - stereo tungsten sense wires and 37,746 aluminum field wires , with a shell made of carbon fiber - epoxy composite with an internal wall of @xmath41 mm thickness .
the gas used is a 90% helium , 10% isobutane mixture .
the momentum resolution is @xmath42 .
vertices are reconstructed with a spatial resolution of @xmath43 3 mm .
the calorimeter @xcite , with a readout granularity of @xmath43(4.4 @xmath44 4.4 ) @xmath45 , for a total of 2440 cells arranged in five layers , covers 98% of the solid angle .
each cell is read out at both ends by photomultipliers , both in amplitude and time .
the energy deposits are obtained from the signal amplitude while the arrival times and the particles positions are obtained from the time differences .
cells close in time and space are grouped into energy clusters .
energy and time resolutions are @xmath46 and @xmath47 , respectively . the trigger @xcite uses both calorimeter and chamber information . in this analysis
the events are selected by the calorimeter trigger , requiring two energy deposits with @xmath48 mev for the barrel and @xmath49 mev for the endcaps .
+ machine parameters are measured online by means of large angle bhabha scattering events .
the average value of the center of mass energy is evaluated with a precision of about 30 kev each 200 nb@xmath3 of integrated luminosity .
collected data are processed by an event classification algorithm @xcite , which streams various categories of events in different output files .
the analysis of the decay chain @xmath0 , @xmath50 , has been performed on a data sample of about 1.7 fb@xmath3 .
the monte carlo ( mc ) simulation for the signal has been produced with @xmath51 according to vmd model .
the signal production corresponds to an integrated luminosity one hundred times larger than collected data .
final state radiation has been included using photos monte carlo generator @xcite .
for the background , all @xmath22 decays and the not resonant @xmath52 process have been simulated with a statistics two times larger than data .
+ all mc productions take into account changes in da@xmath2ne operation and background conditions on a run - by - run basis .
data - mc corrections for cluster energies and tracking efficiencies are evaluated with radiative bhabha and @xmath53 samples , respectively .
the main steps of the analysis are : 1 .
a preselection requiring two tracks of opposite sign extrapolated to a cylinder around the interaction point and 6 prompt photon candidates ; 2 . a loose cut on the six photon invariant mass : @xmath54 mev ; 3 . a 3@xmath55 cut on the recoil mass against the @xmath4 pair , @xmath56 , shown in fig .
[ fig : mmiss ] : @xmath57 mev mass ( @xmath43 547.85 mev ) .
the shift is due to the treatment of the energy loss for the electrons in the tracking reconstruction , that assumes the energy loss for pions . ]
; 4 . a cut on the invariant mass and the distance between the two tracks extrapolated to the beam pipe and at the drift chamber wall surfaces , to reject photon conversion
; 5 . a cut based on the time of flight ( tof ) of the tracks to the calorimeter to reject events with charged pions in the final state .
these cuts are described in details in ref .
@xcite , which reports the results for a search of a light vector boson using the same data sample .
the @xmath34 and @xmath58 variable is defined as the angle between the @xmath23 and the @xmath59 in the rest frame . ]
distributions , after the @xmath56 cut and at the end of the analysis chain , are shown in fig .
[ fig : compneubefore ] , compared to mc expectations .
the residual background contamination is concentrated at high masses and is dominated by @xmath60 events with an early @xmath61 decay .
cc + the analysis efficiency for signal events as a function of the @xmath4 invariant mass is shown in fig .
[ fig : effi ] for 5 mev mass bins .
it is about 10@xmath62 at low masses and increases to @xmath63 at 460 mev , due to the larger acceptance for higher momentum tracks . at the end of the analysis chain ,
30,577 events are selected , with @xmath64 background contamination .
after bin to bin background subtraction , 29,625@xmath31178 @xmath65 , @xmath50 , candidates are present in the dataset .
the branching ratio has been calculated using bin - by - bin efficiency correction : @xmath66 the luminosity measurement is obtained using very large angle bhabha scattering events @xcite , giving an integrated luminosity of @xmath67 .
the effective @xmath22 production cross section takes into account the center of mass energy variations ( at 1% level ) @xcite : @xmath68 .
the value of the br(@xmath50)=(32.57@xmath310.23)% is taken from @xcite .
our result is : @xmath69 where the error includes the uncertainties on luminosity and @xmath22 production cross section .
the systematic error has been evaluated moving by @xmath70 the analysis cuts on the recoil mass and tof , and by @xmath31 20% those related to conversion cuts ( table [ tab : syst_br ] ) . in order to evaluate the systematic due to the variation of the analysis efficiency for low @xmath34 values
, the br has been measured for m@xmath71 mev , where the efficiency has a smoother behaviour .
these systematics are negligible with respect to the normalization error .
.systematics on the branching ratio
. relative variation of each contribution with respect to the @xmath56 , tof , photon conversion , event classification cuts are reported .
[ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ tab : mee_point ] the @xmath72 distribution has been fitted as a function of the invariant mass with two free parameters , one corresponding to the normalization and the other to @xmath73 , as shown in fig .
[ fig : data_5mev ] , together with the predictions form the vmd and from ref . @xcite . from this fit ,
the value of the slope @xmath35 is : @xmath74 in agreement within the uncertainties with the value obtained from the fit to the invariant mass spectrum ( eq .
[ eq : fit1 ] ) .
analysing the @xmath0 decay channel , an precise measurements of both , the br(@xmath0 ) , and the transition form factor slope @xmath25 are obtained .
we measured a value of @xmath7@xmath8@xmath9 and a value of the slope of @xmath10@xmath11 .
+ the br(@xmath65 ) is in agreement with vmd predictions @xcite and with the snd and cmd-2 results @xcite .
the transition form factor slope is in agreement with vmd predictions @xcite , with a precision that is a factor of five better than previous snd measurement .
+ the transition form factor has been used @xcite to derive the upper limit for the production of a light dark boson u in @xmath75 decay .
present measurement confirms the exclusion plot obtained by kloe in the mass range ( 5 @xmath76 m@xmath77 @xmath76 470 ) mev , where b@xmath37 = 1 gev@xmath36 was assumed @xcite .
we warmly thank our former kloe colleagues for the access to the data collected during the kloe data taking campaign .
we thank the da@xmath2ne team for their efforts in maintaining low background running conditions and their collaboration during all data taking .
we want to thank our technical staff : g.f .
fortugno and f. sborzacchi for their dedication in ensuring efficient operation of the kloe computing facilities ; m. anelli for his continuous attention to the gas system and detector safety ; a. balla , m. gatta , g. corradi and g. papalino for electronics maintenance ; m. santoni , g. paoluzzi and r. rosellini for general detector support ; c. piscitelli for his help during major maintenance periods .
this work was supported in part by the eu integrated infrastructure initiative hadron physics project under contract number rii3-ct- 2004 - 506078 ; by the european commission under the 7th framework programme through the ` research infrastructures ' action of the ` capacities ' programme , call : fp7-infrastructures-2008 - 1 , grant agreement no . 227431 ; by the polish national science centre through the grants no .
dec-2011/03/n / st2/02641 , 2011/01/d / st2/00748 , 2011/03/n / st2/02652 , + 2013/08/m / st2/00323 , and by the foundation for polish science through the mpd programme and the project homing plus bis/2011 - 4/3 . | report study vector pseudoscalar conversion decay @xmath0 @xmath13 conversion decays @xmath14 radiated photon virtual squared dilepton invariant mass @xmath15 corresponds photon 4-momentum transferred @xmath16 probability lepton pair invariant mass determined electromagnetic dynamical structure transition @xmath17 differential decay rate normalized radiative width : @xmath18^{3/2} @xmath19 mass electron @xmath20 @xmath21 masses @xmath22 @xmath23 mesons @xmath24 transition form factor describes coupling mesons virtual photons provides information nature underlying structure slope transition form factor @xmath25 defined @xmath26 vector meson dominance model transition form factor parametrized @xmath27 vmd describes some transitions failing others @xmath29 new models developed overcome discrepancies validated experimental data existing data @xmath0 snd @xcite cmd-2 @xcite experiments measurements branching ratio@xmath30 ( 1.19@xmath310.19.07)@xmath32 and ( 1.14@xmath310.10.06)@xmath32vmd expectation = 1.1@xmath32 @xcite experiment measured transition form factor @xmath34 mass distribution 213 events @xmath35= 3.8@xmath311.8 )@xmath36 @xcite vmd expectation @xmath35=1 gev@xmath36 @xcite large data performed three measurements branching fraction @xmath0 decay transition form factor slope dilepton extraction @xmath38 dilepton invariant mass frascati @xmath22-factory @xmath4 collider mass energy @xmath39 mev positron electron beams collide - 25 mrad producing @xmath22 mesons kloe experiment operated 2000 to 2006 2.5 fb@xmath3 apparatus cylindrical drift chamber lead - fiber electromagnetic calorimeter superconducting coil 0.52 t axial field beam pipe sphere 10 cm radius 0.5 mm beryllium - aluminum alloy drift chamber 4 m 3.3 m long 12,582 tungsten wires 37,746 aluminum field wires shell carbon fiber - epoxy composite wall @xmath41 mm thickness gas 90% helium 10% isobutane momentum resolution @xmath42vertices reconstructed resolution @xmath43 3 mm calorimeter @xcite readout granularity @xmath43 2440 cells five layers covers 98% solid angle cell read out by photomultipliers amplitude time energy deposits signal amplitude arrival times particles positions time differences cells grouped into energy clusters energy time resolutions @xmath46 and @xmath47 trigger @xcite uses calorimeter chamber information events selected by calorimeter trigger two energy deposits @xmath48 mev barrel @xmath49 mev endcaps machine parameters measured large angle bhabha scattering events average center mass energy evaluated precision 30 kev each 200 nb@xmath3 integrated luminosity data processed event classification algorithm @xcite streams categories events output files analysis decay chain data sample 1.7 fb@xmath3 monte carlo simulation signal produced @xmath51 signal production corresponds integrated luminosity one hundred times larger data final state radiation included monte carlo generator @xcite @xmath22 decays not resonant @xmath52 process simulated statistics two times larger data mc productions changes@xmath2ne operation background conditionsdata - mc corrections for cluster energies tracking efficiencies evaluated with radiative bhabha @xmath53 samples steps analysis preselection two tracks opposite sign cylinder interaction point 6 photon candidates loose cut on six photon invariant mass @xmath54 mev@xmath55 cut on recoil mass against @xmath4 pair @xmath56 fig @xmath57 mev mass @xmath43 547.85 mev shift due to energy loss electrons tracking cut on invariant mass distance between tracks beam pipe drift chamber wall reject photon conversion cut time of flight tracks to calorimeter reject events charged pions cuts described in ref . @xcite results light vector boson @xmath34 @xmath58 variable angle between @xmath23 @xmath59 rest frame distributions after @xmath56 cut end analysis chain shown in fig . compared to mc expectations residual background contamination at high masses dominated by @xmath60 events early @xmath61 decay analysis efficiency for signal events @xmath4 invariant mass shown in fig . for 5 mev mass bins10@xmath62 low masses increases to @xmath63 at 460 mev higher momentum tracks end analysis chain 30,577 events selected @xmath64 background contamination after bin to bin subtraction 29,625@xmath31178 @xmath65 @xmath50 candidates present dataset branching ratio calculated bin - by - bin efficiency correction : @xmath66 luminosity measurement large angle bhabha scattering events integrated luminosity @xmath67 @xmath22 production cross section center mass energy variations 1% level @xmath68 br(@xmath50)=(32.57@xmath310.23)% from @xcite result @xmath69 error includes uncertainties on luminosity @xmath22 production cross section systematic error evaluated by @xmath70 analysis cuts recoil mass tof @xmath31 20% conversion cuts low @xmath34 values br measured for m@xmath71 mev efficiency smoother systematics negligible normalization error branching ratio relative variation contribution @xmath56 tof photon conversion event classification cuts reported @xmath72 distribution function invariant mass two free parameters one normalization @xmath73 figfig : data_5mev predictions vmd ref @xcite value slope @xmath35 @xmath74 agreement value fit invariant mass spectrum eq fit1 analysing @xmath0 decay channel precise measurements br(@xmath0 ) transition form factor slope @xmath25 obtained measured value @xmath7@xmath8@xmath9 slope @xmath10@xmath11 br(@xmath65 ) agreement with vmd predictions snd cmd-2 results transition form factor slope agreement vmd predictions precision factor five better previous snd measurement transition form factor used upper limit production light dark boson u in @xmath75 decay measurement confirms exclusion plot kloe mass range ( 5 @xmath76 m@xmath77 @xmath76 470 ) mev b@xmath37 = 1 gev@xmath36 assumed @xcite thank former kloe colleagues access data kloe data taking campaign da@xmath2ne team low background running conditions collaboration technical staff fortugno f. sborzacchi operation kloe computing facilities m. anelli gas system detector safety. balla gatta corradi papalino electronics maintenance santoni paoluzzi rosellini detector supportpiscitelli help maintenance supported eu infrastructure initiative hadron physics project contract rii3-ct- 2004 - 506078 european commission 7th framework programme research infrastructures capacities programme fp7-infrastructures-2008 - 1 grant agreement 227431 polish national science centre grants st2/02641 st2/00748 2013/08 st2/00323 foundation polish science mpd programme project homing bis/2011 - 4/3 | 0.434779 | 2,871 | 1,502 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,873 | the cold component of large transverse momentum dilepton production via semi - coherent two - photon interaction is calculated .
the cold contribution is essential to the dilepton spectra in the soft region for different mass bins .
the results are compared with the phenix experimental data at rhic , and we find that the modification of semi - coherent two - photon processes is more evident with the rising dilepton mass bins .
pacs numbers:12.38.mh , 25.75.nq , 21.65.qr | the main propose of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions is to probe the thermal information of the dense thermalized matter which is named quark - gluon plasma ( qgp).the electromagnetic radiation emitted from the center of the collision is a kind of very clean information due to the real and virtual photons which do not interact strongly , therefore photons and dileptons can escape from the dense medium without strong interactions , and may carry the information of the center dynamics@xcite .
however , so far no evident experiments show that some information is exactly produced from the thermalized medium@xcite .
the @xmath0 meson couples to the @xmath1 channel strongly , and the lifetime of @xmath0 meson is much shorter than the one of the expected hot hadronic gas .
the yield of the @xmath0 mess spectrum may be modified in the hot medium due to the chiral symmetry restoration .
the scenario of mass dropping or melting in a hot medium successfully interprets the dilepton yield enhancement in the low mass region at super proton synchrotron ( sps ) for pb - au 158 gev / a collisions@xcite .
recently , the measurement of the dilepton continuum at relativistic heavy ion collider ( rhic ) energies has been performed by the phenix experiments for au - au 200 gev / a collisions@xcite . the dilepton yield in the low mass range between 0.2 and 0.8 gev
is enhanced by a factor of 2@xmath23 compared with the expectation from hadron decays .
however , such a modifying scenario can not well explain the enhancement in the au - au collisions at rhic .
the imperfect modifying models of hadron decays present other probable mechanisms to explain the enhancement of the dilepton yield at low mass .
moreover , the dilepton enhancement at rhic is implied that such phenomena are related strongly to the hot plasma scenario .
the contribution of thermal dileptons at the low mass is covered by the cocktail of hadron decays because the vector meson peaks is more pronounced than the thermal spectrum .
the thermal information is dominant in the intermediate mass region between the @xmath3 and @xmath4 vector meson for the phase transition theory , but the contribution of dileptons in this region also can be explained by the decays of charmed mesons . the na60 collaboration has also observed an enhancement at intermediate mass .
the data suggest that such an enhancement may include a thermal information and not just charm decays@xcite . except for the above problems ,
a new puzzle was performed by phenix collaboration @xcite .
the @xmath5 spectra of dileptons in @xmath6 collisions for different mass bins are in agreement with the expectation of the cocktail , charm decays and direct contributions .
the agreement also exists in the au - au collisions at high @xmath5 ( @xmath7gev ) .
the excess contribution above the cocktail and charm decays is consistent with the contribution from direct dileptons . in the soft region of @xmath8gev , pqcd is out of use , and the spectra are still higher than the expectation of cocktail and charm decays . if fitted with exponential in this soft window , one has a slope @xmath9mev , which is almost twice smaller than the typical slope of the standard thermal component .
another candidate in the soft window is the new `` cold '' component which is still valid in the low @xmath5 region . in ref
@xcite the authors suggest a new cold dilepton production mechanism which is not discussed in the standard theory list before .
the semi - coherent two - photon processes are the so - called dilepton source for small mass bins and low @xmath5 .
shuryak e. et .
al . use the equivalent photon approximation to determine the differential cross section for the @xmath10 processes in au - au collisions , and have concluded that the semi - coherent production of dileptons does not contribute significantly to the phenix data@xcite .
however , we derive the yield of dileptons for @xmath10 processes with the restriction @xmath11 , and finally find that the production of double photon interaction has a positive contribution to the cocktail and charm decays in the soft region .
one notes that the impact parameter @xmath12 is smaller than the transverse dimension of the system @xmath13 , and that the dense hot medium can not be created in the heavy ion collisions if @xmath14 because the qgp is centrality dependent .
the equivalent photon spectrum corresponding to a point charge @xmath15 , moving with a velocity @xmath16 is given by @xmath17,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the argument of the modified bessel functions is @xmath18 , and @xmath19 corresponds to the radius of the radiation system with the maximum energy of the photons .
after the macdonald approximation the above formulation can be written into a compact form as@xcite @xmath20 where @xmath21 and @xmath22 for au - au 200gev / a collisions at rhic . in this article we use the natural units , namely @xmath23 .
the differential cross section of two - photon interaction for au - au collisions is given by @xmath24 where the total cross section of @xmath25 is@xcite @xmath26,\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath27^{1/2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the semi - coherent case , @xmath28 , the total transverse momentum of dileptons is @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the transverse momentum of a photon .
therefore the differential cross section can be written in the terms of dilepton transverse momentum as the following @xmath31 & & \times\int_{p_{2tmin}}^{\gamma / r_{min}}\mathrm{ln}\frac{\gamma}{q_{2t}r_{min}}\frac{1}{q_{2t}}dq_{2t},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the minimum transverse momentum of photon @xmath32 is @xmath33gev due to the single track acceptance condition@xcite .
if both the photon transverse momenta ( @xmath34 and @xmath35 ) are the same large ( non - coherent ) or small ( coherent ) , the total transverse momentum would have a very small value ( @xmath36 ) , then a dilepton could not obtain large transverse momentum in the @xmath37 interaction . the single track condition @xmath38gev allows us to discuss large transverse momentum dilepton production in the two - photon reaction , the contribution of non - coherent and coherent photon - photon processes is weak compared with the semi - coherent processes .
this is the reason why the semi - coherent approach is essential in the two - photon interactions . for different mass bins .
( panel a)the solid line : the sum of cocktail and charm decay ; the dot line : the sum of cocktail and charm decay plus the contribution of direct dileptons [ 32 ] ; ( panel b)the contribution of @xmath39 , the dot line : 100mev@xmath40200mev ; the solid line : 200mev@xmath40300mev ; the dash line : 300mev@xmath40500mev ; the dash dot line : 500mev@xmath40750mev ; the dash dot dot line : 810mev@xmath40990mev .
, width=9 ] in the semi - coherent case ( @xmath41 and @xmath42 ) , a non - coherent photon with large transverse momentum is radiated from a nucleus and a coherent photon with small transverse momentum is radiated from a proton of another nucleus in the relativistic heavy ion collisions . the large transverse momentum yield for different mass bins
is given as follows @xmath43 where the yield relates to the differential cross section @xmath44 for nucleus - nucleus collisions with the total cross section @xmath45 in the form @xmath46 .
the authors in ref@xcite use @xmath47 for the au - au 200gev / a collisions at rhic .
from fig . 1 one can see that the contribution of two - photon processes is only valid in the region of @xmath483gev due to the radiation limit condition @xmath49 .
it also implies that the spectra of @xmath10 interaction depend on the nucleus radiation energies .
the energy of photons radiated from nuclei is localized in the range of relatively small @xmath30 .
shuryak e. et .
al . have discussed the two - photon processes by using a charge distribution form factor@xcite .
a charge distribution is necessary to the form factor , but the woods - saxon approximation they used has depressed the value of the form factor , therefore the spectra of dileptons under @xmath39 interaction are also depressed quickly with the rising dilepton transverse momentum . in this article
we derive the yield of dileptons for @xmath10 processes with the restriction @xmath50 , where the quark - gluon plasma may be created , and it is found that the spectra for different mass bins are essential in the soft region . at low mass , @xmath51200mev , the contribution of cocktail and charm decays is in agreement with the phenix data .
however , in the soft region ( @xmath481gev ) the data are still higher than the expectation of cocktail and charm decays at @xmath52200mev .
the yield enhancement is more evident with the increasing of dilepton mass . in order to avoid the influence of
@xmath53 decays of narrow resonance vector mesons , the mass regions around the @xmath54 meson and @xmath3 meson are excluded by phenix collaboration . in fig .
2 we plot the large transverse momentum dilepton yield under @xmath39 interactions for different mass bins . as we discussed above the yield enhancement
is not evident for the mass bins as 100mev@xmath40200mev and 200mev@xmath40300mev , so the correlation of cold @xmath10 component is weak ; in the mass region of 300mev@xmath40500mev , 500mev@xmath40750mev and 810mev@xmath40990mev the data are higher almost one order than the expectation of cocktail and charm decays , and the modification of @xmath10 reaction is essential now
. therefore the two - photon interaction plays an important role in the large transverse momentum dilepton production in the soft @xmath5 region .
the dot line is the contribution of the cocktail and charm decay , the dash line is the photon - photon production , and the solid line is the total contribution.,width=566 ]
we derived the two - photon processes from the passage of @xmath39 .
the large transverse momentum dilepton can be created in the semi - coherent two - photon interaction .
the @xmath10 processes may be an essential complementarity to the previous standard cold dilepton production . in the macdonald approximation
the energy of the radiated photon is limited in the region of @xmath55 , therefore the cold dilepton component of two - photon processes is still valid in the soft @xmath5 region where the pqcd is out of use .
the numerical results are plotted by comparing with the phenix experimental data .
the modification of two - photon processes is more evident with the rising dilepton mass , especially in the mass bins of 300mev@xmath40500mev , 500mev@xmath40750mev and 810mev@xmath40990mev . | ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions probe thermal information matter quark - gluon plasma electromagnetic radiation from center collision clean information photons photons dileptons escape medium carry information center dynamics no experiments show information from thermalized medium @xmath0 meson couples to @xmath1 channel strongly lifetime shorter than hot hadronic gas yield spectrum modified in hot medium due chiral symmetry restoration mass dropping melting in hot medium interprets dilepton yield enhancement low mass region at super proton synchrotron for - 158 gev / a collisions measurement dilepton continuum at relativistic heavy ion collider rhic energies phenix experiments - 200 gev / a collisions dilepton yield low mass between 0.2 and 0.8 gev enhanced by factor of 2@xmath23 hadron decays modifying scenario explain enhancement collisions at rhic imperfect modifying models hadron decays present other mechanisms explain enhancement dilepton yield low mass dilepton enhancement at rhic related to hot plasma scenariothermal dileptons low mass covered by hadron decays vector meson thermal spectrum thermal information dominant intermediate mass region between @xmath3 @xmath4 vector meson phase transition contribution dileptons explained by decays charmed mesons na60 collaboration observed enhancement at intermediate mass enhancement include thermal information not charm decays new puzzle performed by phenix collaboration @xmath5 spectra dileptons in @xmath6 collisions with cocktail charm decays direct contributions agreement au - au collisions high @xmath5 excess contribution above cocktail charm decays consistent with direct dileptons soft region of @xmath8gev pqcd out of use spectra higher than cocktail charm decays fitted exponential slope @xmath9mev twice smaller than typical slope standard thermal component candidate new cold component valid in low @xmath5 region authors suggest new cold dilepton production mechanism semi - coherent two - photon processes dilepton source for small mass bins low @xmath5 shuryak e.equivalent photon approximation differential cross section @xmath10 processes au - au collisions semi - coherent production dileptons contribute phenix data derive yield dileptons @xmath10 processes restriction @xmath11 double photon interaction positive cocktail charm decays soft region impact parameter @xmath12 smaller than transverse dimension system @xmath13 dense hot medium heavy ion collisions qgp centrality dependent equivalent photon spectrum point charge @xmath15 velocity @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 radius radiation system maximum energy photons macdonald approximation formulation written compact form@xcite @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 for au - au collisions rhic use natural units @xmath23 differential cross section two - photon interaction au - au collisions @xmath24 total cross section @xmath25 is @xmath26 @xmath27 semi - coherent case @xmath28 total transverse momentum of dileptons is @xmath29 @xmath30 transverse momentum photondifferential cross section dilepton transverse momentum @xmath31{2tmin}}\gamma r{2t}r_{min}}{2t}}dq{2t minimum transverse momentum photon @xmath32 is @xmath33gev single track acceptance condition if photon transverse momenta @xmath34 large or small total transverse momentum small value @xmath36 dilepton obtain large transverse momentum @xmath37 interaction single track condition @xmath38gev allows large transverse momentum dilepton production two - photon reaction contribution non - coherent coherent processes weak semi - coherent processes semi - coherent approach essential two - photon interactions panel a solid line sum cocktail charm decay dot line contribution direct dileptons panel b contribution @xmath39 dot line 100mev@xmath40200mev solid line 200mev@xmath40300mev dash line 300mev@xmath40500mev dot line 500mev@xmath40750mev 810mev@xmath40990mevwidth=9 semi - coherent case @xmath41 non - coherent photon large momentum radiated from nucleus coherent small momentum proton nucleus relativistic heavy ion collisions large transverse momentum yield different mass bins @xmath43 relates differential cross section @xmath44 nucleus - nucleus collisions total cross section @xmath45 @xmath46 authors use @xmath47 au - 200gev / collisions rhic contribution two - photon processes valid @xmath483gev radiation limit condition @xmath49 spectra @xmath10 interaction depend nucleus radiation energies energy photons nuclei localized small @xmath30 shuryak discussed two - photon processes charge distribution form factor necessary woods - saxon approximation depressed value form factor spectra dileptons @xmath39 depressed rising dilepton transverse momentum yield dileptons @xmath10 processes restriction @xmath50 quark - gluon plasma created spectra different mass bins essential soft region low mass @xmath51200mev contribution cocktail charm decays phenix datasoft region @xmath481gev data higher than cocktail charm decays at @xmath52200mev yield enhancement evident dilepton mass @xmath53 decays regions around @xmath54 @xmath3 excluded phenix fig . 2 large transverse momentum dilepton yield under @xmath39 interactions mass bins yield enhancement not evident 100mev@xmath40200mev 200mev@xmath40300mev correlation cold @xmath10 component weak 300mev@xmath40500mev 500mev@xmath40750mev 810mev@xmath40990mev data higher cocktail charm decays modification @xmath10 reaction essential two - photon interaction large transverse momentum dilepton production soft @xmath5 region dot line cocktail charm decay dash line photon - production solid line total contribution derived two - photon processes from passage @xmath39 large transverse momentum dilepton created semi - coherent two - photon interaction @xmath10 processes cold dilepton production energy radiated photon limited in @xmath55 cold dilepton component valid in soft @xmath5 region pqcd out of use numerical results phenix experimental datamodification two - photon processes evident rising dilepton mass mass bins 300mev 810mev@xmath40990mev | 0.42649 | 2,504 | 1,295 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,886 | we investigate the possibility to detect wimps at the ilc in a model - independent way using events with single photons .
the study is done with a full detector simulation of the ldc detector and marlinreco .
it turns out that wimps are observable this way at the ilc if their coupling to electrons is not too small .
beam polarisation can increase the accessible phase space significantly . | weakly interacting massive particles ( wimps ) are currently favoured as candidates for dark matter , which makes up about 20@xmath0 percent of the total matter - energy content of the universe .
although the lightest supersymmetric particle , which is the lightest neutralino in many susy models , would make a very good wimp if susy with r - parity conservation is realised in nature , most extensions of the standard model of particle physics contain wimps .
in fact the more general requirement is that some new conserved quantum number makes the lightest of the new particles stable .
the international linear collider ( ilc ) offers the possibility to look for wimps in a rather model - independent way , which first has been pointed out in @xcite . here
, the expected sensitivity to such a wimp signal , the achievable mass resolution and the influence of beam polarisation are studied using a full detector simulation .
assuming that the cosmic relic density of wimps is determined by pair annihilation of wimps , and that an unknown branching fraction @xmath1 of these annihilations proceeds into an @xmath2 pair(@xmath3 ) , crossing relations can be used to derive an expected cross - section for the reverse process , i.e. @xmath4 .
this cross - section contains as free parameters : * the @xmath2 branching fraction @xmath1 * the mass of the wimp @xmath5 * the spin of the wimp @xmath6 * the angular momentum of the annihilation s dominant partial wave @xmath7 . in order that this process be observable in a collider detector , where the wimps themselves leave no signature , an additional photon from initial state radiation
is required : @xmath8 . the main standard model background process for this reaction is neutrino pair production , again with an isr photon : @xmath9 . at energies significantly above the @xmath10 pole , this reaction is dominantly mediated by @xmath11-channel @xmath12-exchange and can thus be reduced significantly by choosing the appropriate polarisations for the electron and position beams .
therefore we consider three possible scenarios for the helicity structure of the wimp coupling to electrons : * the same as the sm charged current weak interaction , i.e. only @xmath13 is nonzero * parity and helicity conserving , i.e. @xmath14 * opposite to sm charged current weak interaction , i.e. only @xmath15 is nonzero . especially in the last case a significant enhancement of the signal over background ratio is expected .
the neutrino background has been generated with nunugpv @xcite , which is a dedicated generator for neutrino pair production with up to three photons @xmath16 .
@xmath17 events with at least one photon with an energy @xmath18 8 gev @xmath19 250 gev and a polar angle @xmath20 15@xmath21 were generated at a center - of - mass energy of @xmath22 , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 500 fb@xmath23 .
these events serve not only to describe the irreducible standard model background , but are also reweighted w.r.t .
energy and polar angle of the photon according to the wimp cross - section .
the benefit of the is method is that in this way a signal sample can be obtained for all mass and spin hypotheses to be tested without applying the detector simulation again , which reduces the processing time tremendously .
this sample has been subjected to the full ldc detector simulation , using the detector model ldc01sc with a 4 t magnetic field and mokka 6.1 @xcite .
the events were then reconstructed with marlinreco @xcite , using the wolf @xcite algorithm for particle flow and a simple selection demanding @xmath24 10 gev and 20@xmath25 . for the energy resolution studies described in the following , also an angular match to the generated photon was required .
the influence of the detector s energy resolution has been studied at two levels : besides the full reconstruction , the so called cheated reconstruction makes use of the simulation information for associating calorimeter clusters with particles . this way the pure detector resolution and calibration can be disentangled from confusion effects , noise and so on .
figure [ fig : egamma ] shows the generated ( left ) as well as the cheated and fully reconstructed ( right ) energy spectra of the most energetic photon candidate of the events .
while the peak at @xmath26 gev from radiative returns to the @xmath10 resonance is extremely clear at the generator level , it his heavily smeared after reconstruction , even for the cheated case . the full reconstruction yields even less photons at high energies .
the reason for this effect can be seen in the left plot of figure [ fig : ncluseres ] , which shows the mean number of photon candiates per generated photon as a function of the generated photon s energy .
it is clearly visible that at high photon energies the wolf algorithm tends to split clusters stemming from one photon into several photon candidates .
therefore we apply a merging procedure to neighboring photon candidates , after which the fully reconstructed photon energy distribution is practicaly identical to the cheated spectrum shown in the right hand plot of figure [ fig : egamma ] . the energy resolution obtained after the recombination procedure is shown in right plot of figure [ fig : ncluseres ] as a function of @xmath27 . with being roughly constant at about @xmath28
, it seems to be significantly worse than the @xmath29 aimed for at the ilc .
this effect has been meanwhile tracked down to an imperfect calibration , which means that the results presented in the next section are expected to improve further once a better calibration procedure is applied .
.,title="fig : " ] .,title="fig : " ]
currently , the following scenarios have been investigated : * wimp spin : p - wave annihilation ( j=1 ) for @xmath30 and @xmath31 * wimp couplings : @xmath32 , @xmath33 and @xmath34 * polarisation : unpolarised beams , @xmath35 polarisation only ( @xmath36 ) and additional @xmath37 polarisation ( @xmath36 and @xmath38 ) . for each combination of these parameters ,
the reach of the ilc with an integrated luminosity of 500 fb@xmath23 at @xmath39 gev for a 3@xmath40 observation of wimps has been determined as a function of the wimp mass . due to the high irreducible background from standard model neutrino production ,
the sensitivity has been obtained statistically by using fractional event counting @xcite as implemented in the root class tlimit .
observation reach of the ilc for a spin-1 wimp in terms of wimp mass and @xmath1 for three different assumptions on the chirality of the electron - wimp coupling , see text .
full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43 .
regions above the curves are accessible.,title="fig : " ] observation reach of the ilc for a spin-1 wimp in terms of wimp mass and @xmath1 for three different assumptions on the chirality of the electron - wimp coupling , see text . full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43 .
regions above the curves are accessible.,title="fig : " ] observation reach of the ilc for a spin-1 wimp in terms of wimp mass and @xmath1 for three different assumptions on the chirality of the electron - wimp coupling , see text . full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43 .
regions above the curves are accessible.,title="fig : " ] observation reach of the ilc for a spin-@xmath44 wimp in terms of wimp mass and @xmath1 for three different assumptions on the chirality of the electron - wimp coupling , see text . full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43 .
regions above the curves are accessible.,title="fig : " ] observation reach of the ilc for a spin-@xmath44 wimp in terms of wimp mass and @xmath1 for three different assumptions on the chirality of the electron - wimp coupling , see text . full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43 .
regions above the curves are accessible.,title="fig : " ] observation reach of the ilc for a spin-@xmath44 wimp in terms of wimp mass and @xmath1 for three different assumptions on the chirality of the electron - wimp coupling , see text . full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43 .
regions above the curves are accessible.,title="fig : " ] figure [ fig : case1 ] shows the expected ilc sensitivity for spin-1 wimps in terms of the minimal observable branching fraction to electrons @xmath1 as a function of the wimp mass .
the leftmost plot shows the case where the wimps couple only to lefthanded electrons and righthanded positrons ( @xmath13 ) , the middle plot shows the parity and helicity conserving case ( @xmath14 , while the right plot is dedicated to the case that the wimps couple to righthanded electrons and lefthanded positrons ( @xmath45 ) .
the regions above the curves are accessible , where the full line gives the result for unpolarised beams , the dotted line for @xmath36 and the dashed line for @xmath36 and @xmath38 . in the latter two coupling scenarios
polarised beams increase the reach significantly , especially the additional positron polarisation increases the accessible range in @xmath1 by about a factor of 2 .
figure [ fig : case2 ] shows the same for a spin-@xmath44 wimp . here
the sensitivity is somewhat worse , but again beam polarisation extends the observable part of the parameter space significantly . if wimps are observed at the ilc , their mass can be determined from the recoil mass distribution of the photons : @xmath46 figure [ fig : mass ] shows an example for the recoil mass distribution for a 150 gev spin-1 wimp with both beams polarised .
the wimp signal shown in dark grey kicks in at @xmath47 316 gev .
r0.5 from this distribution , the wimp mass can be reconstructed for example by a template method . for this procedure ,
only 200 fb@xmath23 of the available mc sample have been analysed as dataset , the rest is used for the templates .
figure [ fig : mcase1 ] shows the obtained @xmath48 as function of the reconstructed wimp mass for a 150 gev spin-1 wimp for @xmath49 .
the left plot shows the helicity and parity conserving case , the right plot the case that the wimps couple to righthanded electrons and lefthanded positrons ( @xmath45 ) . again
the full line gives the result for unpolarised beams , the dotted line for @xmath36 and the dashed line for @xmath36 and @xmath38 . without any beam polarisation ,
the mass resolution is about 4 gev , which is reduced to about 1.2 gev by switching on the electron polarisation .
positron polarisation improves the resolution by another factor 2 to about 0.6 gev . from mass determination by a template method for a spin-1 wimp with @xmath5=150 gev .
left : parity and helicity conserving couplings , right:@xmath50 .
full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43 .
, title="fig : " ] from mass determination by a template method for a spin-1 wimp with @xmath5=150 gev . left : parity and helicity conserving couplings , right:@xmath50 .
full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43 .
, title="fig : " ] figure [ fig : mcase2 ] shows the analoguos results for a 180 gev spin-@xmath44 wimp . as for the observation reach ,
the situation is slightly worse than in the spin-1 case , but again the use of beam polarisation leads to a significant gain in resolution . from mass determination by a template method for a spin-@xmath44 wimp with @xmath5=150 gev .
left : parity and helicity conserving couplings , right:@xmath50 .
full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43.,title="fig : " ] from mass determination by a template method for a spin-@xmath44 wimp with @xmath5=150 gev .
left : parity and helicity conserving couplings , right:@xmath50 . full line : @xmath41 , dotted line : @xmath42 , dashed line : @xmath43.,title="fig : " ]
the study of model - independent wimp production at the ilc presented here is one of the first examples of analyses performed using the full simulation of the ldc detector .
a reconstruction for these fully simulated events exists and usable for analysis , but needs further improvements in parallel to the optimization of the detector concept . already with the current level of sophistication
this study shows that there is a good chance to detect wimps in this model - independent way at the ilc and to measure their mass with a precision of about 1 gev .
both the range in phase space as well as the mass resolution improve significantly when polarised beams are assumed .
typically the use of 80% electron polarisation gives improvements of a factor of two over unpolarised beams , whereas an additional positron polarisation of 60% yields another factor of two .
the results presented here will be improved in the near future by applying a more appropriate detector calibration and by using other particle flow algorithms and photon finders .
furthermore reducible backgrounds as well as beamstrahlung have to be included in the study , before finally different detector concepts can be compared .
the authors acknowledge the support by dfg grant li 1560/1 - 1 .
a. birkedal , k. matchev and m. perelstein , phys . rev .
d * 70 * ( 2004 ) 077701 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0403004 ] .
g. montagna , o. nicrosini and f. piccinini , comput .
commun . * 98 * , 206 ( 1996 ) . ` http://polywww.in2p3.fr/activites/physique/geant4/tesla/www/mokka/mokka.html ` ` http://ilcsoft.desy.de/marlin ` | interacting massive particles ( wimps favoured for dark matter 20 percent total matter - energy content lightest supersymmetric particle neutralino in susy models good wimp if r - parity conservation most extensions standard model particle physics contain wimps requirement new conserved quantum number makes lightest particles stable international linear collider ) for wimps model - pointed out in @xcite sensitivity to wimp signal mass resolution influence beam polarisation studied using full detector simulation cosmic relic density of wimps determined by pair annihilation wimps unknown branching fraction annihilations proceeds into @xmath2 pair ) crossing relations derive cross - section for reverse process @xmath4 cross - section contains branching fraction mass wimp spin angular momentum of annihilation s dominant partial wave in collider detector additional photon from initial state radiation required : @xmath8 main standard model background process for reaction neutrino pair production with isr photon : @xmath9energies above @xmath10 pole reaction mediated by @xmath11-channel @xmath12-exchange reduced choosing polarisations for electron position beams three scenarios for helicity structure wimp coupling electrons same current @xmath13 nonzero parity helicity conserving opposite @xmath15 nonzero enhancement signal over background ratio expected neutrino background generated with nunugpv @xcite neutrino pair production three photons @xmath16 @xmath17 events one photon energy @xmath18 8 @xmath19 250 gev polar angle @xmath20 15@xmath21 generated at center - of - mass energy @xmath22 integrated luminosity 500 fb@xmath23 events describe standard model background reweighted energy polar angle photon according wimp cross - section signal sample for mass spin hypotheses without detector simulation reduces processing time sample subjected to full ldc detector simulation 4 t magnetic field mokka 6.1 @xcite events reconstructed with marlinreco @xcite wolf @xcite algorithm particle flow simple selection demanding @xmath24 10 gev 20@xmath25 energy resolution studies angular match to generated photon requiredinfluence detector s energy resolution studied at two levels full reconstruction cheated reconstruction simulation information for associating calorimeter clusters with particles pure detector resolution and calibration disentangled from confusion effects noise figure shows generated cheated fully reconstructed energy spectra of most energetic photon candidate peak at @xmath26 gev from returns to @xmath10 resonance clear at generator level heavily smeared after reconstruction full reconstruction yields less photons at high energies reason for effect in left plot shows mean number of photon candiates per generated photon function of s energy at high photon energies wolf algorithm clusters into several candidates merging procedure to neighboring photon candidates fully reconstructed photon energy distribution identical to cheated spectrum in right plot energy resolution after recombination shown in plot as function of @xmath27 roughly constant at @xmath28 significantly worse than @xmath29 for at ilc effect tracked down to imperfect calibration results next expected to improve once better calibration procedure appliedscenarios investigated wimp spin p - wave annihilation j=1 @xmath30 @xmath31 wimp couplings @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 polarisation unpolarised beams @xmath35 polarisation @xmath36 additional @xmath37 polarisation @xmath36 @xmath38 reach ilc luminosity 500 fb@xmath23 @xmath39 gev 3@xmath40 observation wimps determined function wimp mass high irreducible background model neutrino production obtained event counting @xcite root class tlimit observation reach ilc spin-1 wimp mass @xmath1 three assumptions chirality electron - wimp coupling see text full line @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 regions above curves accessible observation reach ilc spin-1 wimp @xmath1 three assumptions chirality electron - wimp coupling text line @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 regions above curves accessible observation reach ilc spin-1 wimp mass @xmath1 three assumptions chirality electron wimp coupling see text full line @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 regions above curves accessibleobservation reach ilc spin-@xmath44 wimp mass @xmath1 three assumptions chirality electron - wimp coupling text full line @xmath41 dotted line @xmath42 dashed line @xmath43 regions above curves accessible observation reach ilc spin-@xmath44 wimp mass @xmath1 three assumptions chirality electron wimp coupling text full line @xmath41 dotted @xmath42 @xmath43 regions above curves accessible observation reach ilc spin-@xmath44 wimp mass @xmath1 three assumptions text full line @xmath41 dotted line @xmath42 @xmath43 regions above curves accessible figure expected ilc sensitivity spin-1 wimps minimal observable branching fraction electrons function wimp mass leftmost plot wimps couple lefthanded electrons righthanded positrons @xmath13 middle plot parity helicity conserving case @xmath14 right plot wimps couple righthanded electrons lefthanded positrons @xmath45 regions above curves accessible full line result unpolarised beams dotted line @xmath36 dashed line @xmath36 @xmath38polarised beams increase reach additional positron polarisation increases range @xmath1 factor 2 figure shows spin-@xmath44 wimp sensitivity worse beam polarisation extends observable parameter space wimps observed ilc mass determined from recoil mass distribution photons recoil mass distribution 150 gev spin-1 wimp both beams polarised wimp signal @xmath47 316 gev wimp mass reconstructed template method 200 fb@xmath23 sample analysed rest used for templates figure shows obtained @xmath48 reconstructed wimp mass 150 gev spin-1 wimp @xmath49 left plot shows helicity parity conserving case right wimps couple to righthanded electrons positrons @xmath45 full line result for unpolarised beams dotted line @xmath36 dashed line @xmath36 @xmath38 without beam polarisation mass resolution 4 gev reduced to 1.2 gev switching electron polarisation positron polarisation improves resolution factor 2 0.6 gev mass determination template method spin-1 wimp with @xmath5=150 gev left parity helicity conserving couplings@xmath50full line @xmath41 dotted line @xmath42 dashed line @xmath43 title="fig mass determination template method spin-1 wimp @xmath5=150 gev left parity helicity conserving couplings right:@xmath50 full line @xmath41 dotted line @xmath42 dashed @xmath43 title="fig figure shows results 180 gev spin-@xmath44 wimp observation reach worse spin-1 beam polarisation significant gain resolution mass determination spin-@xmath44 wimp @xmath5=150 gev left parity helicity conserving couplings right@xmath50 full line @xmath41 dotted line @xmath42 dashed line @xmath43 mass determination spin-@xmath44 wimp @xmath5=150 gev left parity helicity conserving couplings right@xmath50 full line @xmath41 dotted line @xmath42 dashed @xmath43 study model - independent wimp production ilc first analyses full simulation ldc detector reconstruction simulated events exists needs improvements optimization detector concept current study shows good chance detect wimps model independent measure mass precision 1 gevrange mass resolution improve polarised beams 80% electron polarisation improvements two unpolarised beams positron polarisation 60% yields factor two results appropriate detector calibration particle flow algorithms photon finders reducible backgrounds beamstrahlung included detector concepts authors support dfg grant li 1560/1 - 1. birkedal matchev perelstein phys . rev . 70 ( 2004 ) 077701 arxiv hep - ph/0403004 g. montagna. nicrosini f. piccinini comput . commun. 98 206 ( 1996 ) http://polywww.in2p3.fr/activites/physique/mokka http://ilcsoft.desy.de/marlin | 0.5026 | 3,269 | 1,685 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,890 | the nutev experiment at fermilab presents a determination of the electroweak mixing angle .
high purity , large statistics samples of @xmath0 and @xmath1 events allow the use of the paschos - wolfenstein relation , a technique which considerably reduces systematic errors associated with charm production and other sources . within the standard model , this measurement of @xmath2 indirectly determines the w boson mass to a precision comparable to direct measurements from high energy @xmath3 and @xmath4 colliders .
nutev measures @xmath5 , which implies @xmath6 gev .
outside the standard model , this result can be used to explore the possibility of new physics ; in particular , we present limits on both neutrino oscillations and the presence of extra neutral vector gauge bosons . in deep inelastic neutrino - nucleon scattering
, the weak mixing angle can be extracted from the ratio of neutral current ( nc ) to charged current ( cc ) total cross sections .
a method for determining @xmath7 that is much less dependent on sources of model uncertainty and the the details of charm production ( the largest source of uncertainty in the previous neutrino measurement @xcite ) employs the paschos - wolfenstein relation @xcite : @xmath8 where @xmath9 , and @xmath10 .
unfortunately , the substantially reduced uncertainties come at a price : r@xmath11 is a more difficult quantity to measure experimentally because neutral current neutrino and antineutrino events have identical observed final states .
the two samples can only be separated by knowing the incoming neutrino beam type .
+ high - purity neutrino and antineutrino beams were provided by the sign selected quadrupole train ( ssqt ) at the fermilab tevatron during the 1996 - 1997 fixed target run .
neutrinos are produced from the decay of pions and kaons resulting from interactions of 800 gev protons in a beo target .
dipole magnets immediately downstream of the proton target bend pions and kaons of specified charge in the direction of the nutev detector , while wrong - sign and neutral mesons are stopped in beam dumps .
the resulting beam is almost purely neutrino or antineutrino depending on the selected sign of the parent mesons ( opposite particle contamination is @xmath120.1% ) .
in addition , the beam is almost purely muon neutrinos with a small ( @xmath121% ) contamination of electron neutrinos .
neutrino interactions are then observed in the nutev detector @xcite , which is located approximately 1.5 km downstream of the proton target .
the detector consists of an 18 m long , 690 ton steel - scintillator target followed by an instrumented iron - toroid spectrometer .
the target calorimeter is composed of 168 3 m x 3 m x 5.1 cm steel plates interspersed with liquid scintillation counters and drift chambers .
the scintillation counters provide triggering information as well as a determination of the longitudinal event vertex , event length and visible energy deposition .
the mean position of hits in the drift chambers help establish the transverse event vertex .
the toroidal spectrometer , which determines muon sign and momentum , is not directly used for this analysis .
in addition , because the detector was continuously calibrated through exposure to a wide energy range of test beam hadrons , electrons and muons , many systematics related to detector effects were substantially reduced . | in order to measure @xmath7 , observed neutrino events must be separated into charged current ( cc ) and neutral current ( nc ) categories .
both cc and nc neutrino interactions initiate a cascade of hadrons in the target that is registered in both the scintillation counters and drift chambers . however , muon neutrino cc events are distinguished by the presence of a final state muon , which typically penetrates well beyond the hadronic shower and deposits energy in a large number of consecutive scintillation counters .
these differing event topologies enable the statistical separation of cc and nc interactions based solely on event length ( _ i.e. _ , on the presence or absence of a muon in an event ) .
events with a long length ( spanning more than 20 counters ) are identified as cc candidates ; those with a short length ( spanning less than 20 counters ) as nc candidates .
the experimental quantity measured in both neutrino and antineutrino modes is the ratio : @xmath13 the ratios of short to long events ( @xmath14 ) measured in the nutev data are 0.4198 @xmath15 0.0008 in the neutrino beam and 0.4215 @xmath15 0.0017 in the antineutrino beam .
a standard model value of @xmath7 can be directly extracted from these measured ratios by using a detailed monte carlo simulation of the experiment .
the monte carlo must include the integrated neutrino fluxes , the neutrino cross section , and a detailed description of the nutev detector .
more detailed information on the specific components of the monte carlo simulation can be found elsewhere @xcite . using our separate high - purity neutrino and antineutrino data sets , nutev measures the following linear combination of @xmath16 and @xmath17 : @xmath18 the value for _ x _
is selected using the monte carlo in order to minimize uncertainties related to charm quark production .
the single remaining free parameter in the monte carlo , @xmath7 , is then varied until the model calculation of @xmath19 agrees with what is measured in the data .
the preliminary result from the nutev data sample for @xmath20=175 gev and @xmath21=150 gev is : @xmath22 having chosen the convention @xmath23 , and given the well - determined z mass from lep , our result implies : @xmath24 our measurement is in good agreement with standard model expectations , and is consistent with current measurements from w and z production as well as from other neutrino experiments ( figures [ fig : mw ] , [ fig : mt - mw ] ) .
the data tend to collectively favor a light higgs mass .
the central value from recent global fits to all precision data is @xmath25 gev with an upper bound of @xmath26 gev at 95% cl @xcite .
outside the standard model , deviations between electroweak measurements in @xmath27 scattering and those from other processes are sensitive to new physics . in these proceedings we discuss two such possibilities : neutrino oscillations and extra neutral vector gauge bosons .
+ the presence of neutrino oscillations will directly shift our measured ratios , @xmath28 , from their standard model predictions . since @xmath29 s oscillating to either @xmath30 s or @xmath31 s would be less likely to produce a final state muon
, we would expect to observe an excess of short events .
since no such excess is observed , single mode ( @xmath32 or @xmath33 ) limits can be set for both @xmath34 and @xmath35 oscillations .
one advantage to this type of search is that the paschos - wolfenstein quantity , r@xmath11 , is particularly sensitive to cp - violating oscillations because it is formed from a difference in neutrino and antineutrino rates . as a result ,
nutev is presently the only experiment with direct limits on @xmath36 .
more details on this analysis can be found elsewhere @xcite . + extra z bosons ( z@xmath37 ) are of interest not only because they are predicted by many grand unified theories and superstring models , but also in light of recent experimental developments .
erler and langacker have shown in a recent global fit that the precision electroweak data are better described if an extra tev - scale z boson is included @xcite .
of course , a large portion of this improvement arises from the fact that the 2.5 @xmath38 deviation of the new atomic parity violation ( apv ) measurement @xcite from the standard model prediction can be explained by including an additional z boson @xcite . in our case ,
extra z bosons would manifest themselves as shifts in the neutrino - quark couplings away from their standard model values .
these shifts can arise from both pure - z@xmath37 exchange as well as from z - z@xmath37 mixing contributions .
if we consider constraints on extra z bosons in @xmath39 models , then these coupling shifts are well - determined @xcite . in this case ,
the lightest extra z boson is a linear combination of the so(10 ) singlet @xmath40 and the su(5 ) singlet @xmath41 : @xmath42 expressed in terms of a free parameter @xmath43 .
our data tend to disfavor the inclusion of additional z bosons , so we set a 95% cl lower limit on the mass of such an extra @xmath44 plotted as a function of @xmath43 ( figure [ fig : zprime1 ] ) .
limits are displayed for two cases : the @xmath44 has no mixing with the standard model z , and the more realistic case that allows for some level of mixing . for the latter , we input the z pole data constraint that the level of z-@xmath44 mixing is small ( @xmath45 ) @xcite .
note that the inclusion of z-@xmath44 mixing , even at this small level , weakens the limits . at 95% cl and
assuming a 10@xmath46 level of z-@xmath44 mixing , we set lower mass limits of 675 and 380 gev for the @xmath40 and @xmath47 respectively .
direct searches have already excluded masses below @xmath12 600 gev @xcite . as can be seen from figure [ fig : zprime1 ] ,
our maximum sensitivity is to the @xmath40 , and our exclusion peaks in the most viable region suggested by the apv data .
figure [ fig : zprime2 ] shows a direct comparison of the region nutev excludes in z@xmath48 mass-@xmath43 space to the favored central value from the apv data analyses @xcite .
nutev has successfully completed its data taking and has extracted a value of @xmath7 .
the precision of this result represents a factor of two improvement over previous measurements in @xmath27 scattering , because of reduced uncertainties associated with measuring the paschos - wolfenstein ratio , @xmath19 .
interpreted within the framework of the standard model , this result is equivalent to a determination of the w mass and is consistent with direct measurements of @xmath49 . outside the standard model , this measurement can be used to set limits on neutrino oscillations as well as extra neutral vector gauge bosons . | measure @xmath7 neutrino events into charged cc neutral current nc categories cc nc neutrino interactions initiate cascade hadrons target registered in scintillation counters drift chambers muon neutrino cc events distinguished by final state muon penetrates beyond hadronic shower deposits energy in scintillation counters differing event topologies enable separation of cc nc interactions based on event length presence absence muon events long length more than 20 counters as cc candidates short length less than 20 nc candidates experimental quantity measured in neutrino antineutrino modes is ratio : @xmath13 ratios of short to long events @xmath14 nutev data 0.4198 0.0008 neutrino 0.4215 0.0017 antineutrino beam standard model value of @xmath7 extracted from ratios detailed monte carlo simulation integrated neutrino fluxes neutrino cross section nutev detector nutev measures linear combination of @xmath16 and @xmath17 : @xmath18 value for x selected using monte carlo minimize uncertainties charm quark productionparameter monte carlo @xmath7 varied until model calculation @xmath19 agrees with preliminary result nutev data for @xmath20=175 gev @xmath21=150 gev @xmath22 @xmath23 z mass result implies @xmath24 measurement with standard model expectations consistent with current measurements w z production neutrino experiments data favor light higgs mass central value is @xmath25 gev upper bound @xmath26 gev at 95% cl @xcite deviations between electroweak measurements in @xmath27 scattering sensitive to new physics neutrino oscillations extra neutral vector gauge bosons neutrino oscillations measured ratios @xmath28 from standard model predictions @xmath29 s oscillating to @xmath30 or @xmath31 s less likely produce final state muon excess short events no excess single mode @xmath32 or @xmath33 ) limits set for @xmath34 and @xmath35 oscillations paschos - wolfenstein quantity r@xmath11 sensitive to cp - violating oscillations neutrino antineutrino rates nutev only experiment with direct limits on @xmath36details analysis found elsewhere @xcite extra z bosons ( z@xmath37 ) predicted by unified theories superstring models recent experimental developments erler langacker shown precision electroweak data better described if extra tev - scale z boson included improvement arises 2.5 @xmath38 deviation new atomic parity violation measurement standard model prediction explained additional z boson extra z bosons manifest as shifts neutrino - quark couplings standard model values shifts from pure - z@xmath37 exchange z - z@xmath37 mixing contributions constraints on extra z bosons in @xmath39 models coupling shifts well - determined lightest extra z boson linear combination of so(10 ) singlet @xmath40 su(5 ) singlet @xmath41 : @xmath42 free parameter @xmath43 data disfavor inclusion additional z bosons set 95% lower limit mass extra @xmath44 function @xmath43 limits displayed for two cases no mixing with standard model z case some level mixing z pole data constraint level z-@xmath44 mixing small inclusion z-@xmath44 mixing weakens limits95% cl assuming 10@xmath46 level z-@xmath44 mixing set lower mass limits 675 380 gev @xmath40 @xmath47 searches excluded masses below @xmath12 600 gev @xcite maximum sensitivity @xmath40 exclusion peaks viable region apv data comparison region nutev excludes z@xmath48 mass-@xmath43 space central value apv data analyses @xcite nutev completed data taking extracted value @xmath7 precision result factor two improvement previous measurements @xmath27 scattering reduced uncertainties paschos - wolfenstein ratio @xmath19 standard model result equivalent determination w mass consistent measurements @xmath49 measurement set limits neutrino oscillations extra neutral vector gauge bosons | 0.262612 | 1,596 | 838 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,895 | we investigate the mg@xmath0 and @xmath0 relations in a sample of 72 early - type galaxies drawn mostly from cluster and group environments using a homogeneous data - set which is well - calibrated onto the lick / ids system .
the small intrinsic scatter in mg at a given @xmath0 gives upper limits on the spread in age and metallicity of @xmath1% and @xmath2% respectively , if the spread is attributed to one quantity only and if the variations in age and metallicity are uncorrelated .
the age / metallicity distribution as inferred from the _ vs _ diagnostic diagram reinforces this conclusion , as we find mostly galaxies with large luminosity weighted ages spanning a range in metallicity . using monte - carlo simulations
, we show that the galaxy distribution in the _ vs _ plane can not be reproduced by a model in which galaxy age is the only parameter driving the index-@xmath0 relation . in our sample
we do not find significant evidence for an anti - correlation of ages and metallicities which would keep the index@xmath0 relations tight while hiding a large spread in age and metallicity . as a result of correlated errors in the age - metallicity plane
, a mild age - metallicity anti - correlation can not be completely ruled out given the current data . correcting the line - strengths indices for non - solar abundance ratios following the recent paper by trager et al .
, leads to higher mean metallicity and slightly younger age estimates while preserving the metallicity sequence .
the [ mg / fe ] ratio is mildly correlated with the central velocity dispersion and ranges from [ mg / fe ] @xmath3 0.05 to 0.3 for galaxies with @xmath4 . under the assumption that there is no age gradient along the index@xmath0 relations , the abundance - ratio corrected mg@xmath0 , fe@xmath0 and @xmath0 relations give consistent estimates of
@xmath5}/ \delta \log \sigma \simeq 0.9 \pm 0.1 $ ] .
the slope of the @xmath0 relation limits a potential age trend as a function of @xmath0 to 2 - 3 gyrs along the sequence .
= = = = = = = = # 1 # 1 # 1 # 1 @mathgroup@group @mathgroup@normal@groupeurmn @mathgroup@bold@groupeurbn @mathgroup@group @mathgroup@normal@groupmsamn @mathgroup@bold@groupmsamn = `` 019 = ' ' 016 = `` 040 = ' ' 336 = " 33e = = = = = = = = # 1 # 1 # 1 # 1 = = = = = = = = [ firstpage ] galaxies : abundances - galaxies : formation - galaxies : elliptical and lenticular - galaxies : kinematics and dynamics | over the last two decades spectroscopic and photometric observations of nearby early - type galaxies have shown that they obey tight scaling relations .
for example more luminous galaxies are redder @xcite ; the strength of the mg - absorption ( at @xmath65175 ) increases with increasing central velocity dispersion @xcite ; and early - type galaxies populate only a band ( or ` plane ' ) in the three dimensional space of central velocity dispersion , effective radius , and mean effective surface brightness , the so called ` fundamental plane ' @xcite .
the tightness of the scaling relations has traditionally been interpreted as evidence for a very homogeneous population of early - type galaxies , old stellar populations and similar dynamical make - up of the galaxies @xcite .
for example the colour - magnitude relation is perhaps best explained by a correlation of the metal abundance of the stellar population and total galaxy mass with no age gradient along the sequence @xcite .
however , evidence is being found that elliptical galaxies do generally have complicated dynamical structures ( decoupled cores ) and disturbed morphologies ( shells ) , suggesting an extended and complex assembly such as in a hierarchical merging picture ( cole et al .
. furthermore measurements of absorption line - strength indices together with evolutionary population synthesis models suggest that the mean age of the stellar populations in early - type galaxies span a wide range @xcite .
there is a hint of a connection between the detailed morphology and the mean ages of the stellar populations as ellipticals with disky isophotes show on average younger ages @xcite .
this is in agreement with the studies of cluster galaxies at modest look - back times of 3 - 5 gyr where an increased fraction of blue , late - type galaxies is found @xcite .
probably this change is associated with the transformation of spiral galaxies into s0 types observed over the same interval @xcite .
how can we reconcile the existence of tight scaling relations for present day early - type galaxies with the evidence of an extended galaxy assembly and star formation history ?
an answer to this question rests largely on our understanding of the detailed physical processes which determine the spectral or photometric properties seen in scaling relations .
broad band colours and line - strength indices of integrated stellar populations are sensitive to changes in both their age and metallicity .
in fact it is possible to find many different combinations of ages and metallicities which produce similar overall photometric properties ( age - metallicity degeneracy , worthey 1994 ) . in order to explain tight scaling relations , despite the presence of a substantial diversity in the integrated stellar populations
, it has been suggested that the ages and metallicities of integrated stellar populations ` conspire ' such that deviations from a given scaling relation due to age variations are balanced by an appropriate change in metallicity and vice versa ; an age - metallicity anti - correlation @xcite .
for example , a re - analysis of the sample by trager et al . appears to show that galaxies with a young stellar component are also more metal rich .
recently , evidence for a negative age - metallicity correlation has also been found in other data sets @xcite and in literature compilations @xcite .
in contrast to this kuntschner & davies ( 1998 ) and kuntschner ( 2000 ) did not find strong evidence for the existence of an age - metallicity anti - correlation in their analysis of the fornax cluster . however , to date there is a lack of large , high quality samples with which it would be possible to probe the population of early - type galaxies as a whole .
in this paper we seek to further our understanding of scaling relations such as mg@xmath0 .
we investigate the spread in the mean ages and metallicities _ at a given mass _ but also probe the possibility of age and metallicity trends _ along _ the relations .
we use established methods such as the analysis of the scatter @xcite in the mg@xmath0 relation and line - strength age / metallicity diagnostic diagrams , and take advantage of recent advances in stellar population modeling such as improved corrections for non - solar abundance ratios @xcite .
we employ a homogeneous and high - quality subset of the data collected initially for the smac peculiar motion survey @xcite .
the sample is not complete but includes galaxies drawn mostly from nearby clusters and groups with some galaxies from less dense environments .
the present paper is organized as follows .
section [ sec : data ] describes the sample selection , observations , data reduction and the measurements of the line - strength indices .
section [ sec : mg_sig ] presents the mg@xmath0 and fe@xmath0 relations with an initial investigation into the scatter and slopes . in section [ sec : age ] we present a detailed analysis of age - metallicity diagnostic diagrams including an improved treatment of non - solar abundance ratios .
the effects of the non - solar abundance ratio corrections on the age - metallicity estimates and on the index@xmath0 relations are presented in sections [ sec : imp_index ] and [ sec : imp_sig ] respectively .
our conclusions are given in section [ sec : conclusions ] .
the data reported here is from the smac i97ma spectroscopic run ( see smith et al .
2000 for further details ) .
this run was undertaken principally to provide a secure connection of the smac data to other data sets and concentrated on observing galaxies with measurements previously reported by dressler ( 1984 ) , ( 1993 ) and davies et al .
accordingly the smac i97ma data shows a good overlap with the lick / ids system with 48 galaxies in common . in selecting targets ,
higher priority was given to galaxies with measurements from multiple sources . while the sample is dominated by ellipticals in the virgo and coma clusters ,
it does include a few s0s and galaxies in less dense environments ( see table [ tab : table ] of the appendix ) .
it is not a complete sample in any sense and our sensitivity to environmental effects is limited .
however , we did not find strong differences between galaxies from different environments or morphologies in our sample and thus throughout this paper we do not split up our sample but treat it as a whole .
the observations were carried out by jrl at the 2.5 m isaac newton telescope ( march 1997 ) .
the intermediate dispersion spectrograph was used in conjunction with the 23.5 cm camera , the 900v grating and a tek1k chip . with a slit width of 3 arcsec , an instrumental resolution of @xmath7 fwhm
was achieved , equivalent to an instrumental dispersion ( @xmath8 ) of 98 . the spectra cover a wavelength range of 1024 , sampled at 1 pix@xmath9 from 4800 to 5824 . in total 200 galaxy spectra
were obtained including many repeat observations . along the slit the central five pixels of each observation
were combined giving an effective aperture of @xmath10 arcsec@xmath11 . for other basic data reduction details and the velocity dispersion measurements
see smith et al .
( 2000 ) . the wavelength range and the redshift distribution of our data allows the measurement of five important line - strength indices ( , mg@xmath12 , , fe5270 , fe5335 ) in the lick / ids system ( worthey 1994 , hereafter w94 , trager et al .
the indices were measured on the galaxy spectra after they had been corrected to a relative flux scale and were broadened to the lick / ids resolution and were measured from the un - broadened spectra . ]
( see also worthey & ottaviani 1997 ) . the index measurements were then corrected for internal velocity broadening of the galaxies following the method outlined in kuntschner ( 2000 ) .
the formal measurement errors were rescaled to ensure agreement with the error estimates derived from the repeat observations ( the scale factors ranged from 0.80 to 1.07 for all indices but mg@xmath12 with a scale factor of 0.44 ) . in order to maximize the s / n , multiple index measurements of the same galaxy were averaged giving a sample of 140 different galaxies .
the effective s / n per of these combined measurements ranges from 14 to 78 . in order to keep the errors of the index measurements reasonably low we decided to use only index measurements with an effective @xmath13 per giving a final sample of 72 galaxies ( median s / n @xmath14 per ) which we will analyze in this paper .
all of our data were obtained using the same physical aperture size , but since the galaxies span a factor of @xmath610 in distance , the spectra sample different physical aperture sizes in kpc . since line indices and velocity dispersion exhibit measurable gradients with respect to radius , it is necessary to correct these parameters to a ` standard ' aperture .
here we adopt a generalisation of the aperture correction due to jrgensen , franx & kjrgaard ( 1995 ) , which scales parameters to a circular aperture of diameter 1.19 @xmath15 kpc , @xmath16 mpc@xmath9 , equivalent to a circular aperture of 3.4 arcsec at the distance of coma .
the strength of the correction ( the correction in the quantity per dex in aperture size ) is @xmath17 for @xmath18 , mg@xmath12 and , but @xmath19 for and zero ( no correction ) for .
these correction strengths are based on the average line strength gradients observed in early - type galaxies @xcite .
the correction strengths adopted in this paper are overall similar to the ones used in jrgensen ( 1997 ) , however we use @xmath19 for the index , whereas jrgensen used @xmath20 . in order to determine the systematic offsets between our line - strength system and the original lick / ids system ( on which the worthey 1994 model predictions are based ) , we compared index measurements for the 48 galaxies in common with the lick galaxy library @xcite .
we note that the lick / ids aperture was @xmath21 arcsec ; so for the following comparison our data was corrected to the ( fixed ) lick / ids aperture using the formula given in jrgensen et al .
( 1995 ) .
generally there is good agreement between the two data sets and only small offsets are found ( see table [ tab : lick_off ] and figure [ fig : offset_all ] ) . in order to match the lick / ids system we removed the offsets from our data .
the median measurement errors in the indices , for our sample galaxies , are given in column 4 of table [ tab : lick_off ] .
for a definition of non - standard line - strength indices see section [ sec : special_indices ] .
notes : the first column shows the name of the galaxy .
if the galaxy is found in the ngc or ic ( nilson 1973 ) catalogues , then it will have the name from the corresponding catalogue , in the order of preference given above .
there are also some galaxies denoted by their name from the cgcg ( zwicky et al .
1961 , zxxx - xx ) catalogue , dressler s ( 1980 , dxxx ) catalogue and one galaxy found in the godwin , metcalfe & peach catalogue ( 1983 , gmp 1652 ) .
the second column indicates the environment . if the galaxy is a member of a well known cluster or group , the name is given .
for smaller associations we just indicate whether the galaxies are in a very low density environment ( `` - '' ) or belong to a group .
the third column shows the effective s / n per of the line - strength measurements .
the velocity dispersion @xmath22 and the line - strength indices have been aperture corrected to @xmath23kpc , equivalent to 34 at the distance of the coma cluster .
the line - strength indices are calibrated onto the lick / ids system and corrected to zero velocity dispersion with the exception of the index which is calibrated to the ( 1993 ) system .
mg@xmath12 is given in mag , whereas the other line - strength indices are given in . | last two decades spectroscopic photometric observations early - type galaxies obey tight scaling relations more luminous galaxies redder strength mg - absorption increases with central velocity dispersion early - type galaxies populate band in space central velocity dispersion effective radius surface brightness fundamental plane tightness scaling relations homogeneous population early - type galaxies similar dynamical make - colour - magnitude relation explained by correlation metal abundance stellar population total galaxy mass no age gradient evidence elliptical galaxies have complicated dynamical structures disturbed morphologies suggesting extended complex assembly hierarchical merging picture measurements absorption line - strength indices evolutionary population synthesis models suggest mean age stellar populations in early - type galaxies wide range connection between detailed morphology mean ages ellipticals with disky isophotes show younger ages agreement with studies of cluster galaxies at look - back times 3 - 5 gyr increased fraction of blue late - type galaxies found change associated with transformation of spiral galaxies into s0 typesreconcile tight scaling relations for early - type galaxies with extended galaxy assembly star formation history ? answer rests on understanding physical processes spectral photometric properties in scaling relations broad band colours line - strength indices of integrated stellar populations sensitive to changes age metallicity combinations of ages metallicities similar photometric properties ( age - metallicity degeneracy worthey 1994 ) explain tight scaling relations suggested ages metallicities conspire deviations from scaling relation due age balanced by change in metallicity age - metallicity anti - correlation re - analysis trager galaxies with young stellar component more metal rich evidence for negative age - metallicity correlation found in other data sets literature compilations kuntschner & davies ( 1998 ( 2000 ) find strong evidence age - metallicity anti - correlation in analysis fornax cluster lack of large high quality samples probe population early - type galaxies paper further understanding of scaling relations mg@xmath0 investigate spread in mean ages metallicities at given mass probe age metallicity trends along relationsuse methods analysis scatter @xcite mg@xmath0 relation line - strength age / metallicity diagnostic diagrams advances stellar population modeling improved corrections non - solar abundance ratios employ homogeneous high - quality subset data smac motion survey @xcite sample not complete includes galaxies nearby clusters less dense environments paper organized section data describes sample selection observations data reduction measurements line - strength indices mg_sig presents mg@xmath0 fe@xmath0 relations investigation scatter slopes age detailed analysis age - metallicity diagnostic diagrams improved treatment non - solar abundance ratios effects non - solar abundance ratio corrections age - metallicity estimates index@xmath0 relations presented in sections imp_index imp_sig conclusions in section conclusions data from smac i97ma spectroscopic run smith et 2000 secure connection smac data data sets observing galaxies with measurements previously reported by dressler 1993 davies smac i97ma data shows overlap with lick / ids system 48 galaxies common priority galaxies measurements multiple sourcessample dominated by ellipticals in virgo coma clusters s0s galaxies in less dense environments table appendix not complete sensitivity to environmental effects limited strong differences between galaxies different environments morphologies as whole observations by jrl at 2.5 m isaac newton telescope march 1997 intermediate dispersion spectrograph used with 23.5 cm camera 900v grating tek1k chip slit width 3 arcsec instrumental resolution of @xmath7 fwhm equivalent to instrumental dispersion @xmath8 of 98 spectra cover wavelength range 1024 sampled at 1 pix@xmath9 from 4800 to 5824 200 galaxy spectra obtained repeat observations central five pixels combined aperture @xmath10 arcsec@xmath11 velocity dispersion see smith et al . 2000 wavelength range redshift distribution allows measurement of five line - strength indices fe5270 fe5335 in lick / ids system indices measured on galaxy spectra after corrected to relative flux scale broadened to lick / ids resolution from un - broadened spectra index measurements corrected for internal velocity broadening method kuntschner 2000measurement errors rescaled agreement with error estimates repeat observations scale factors ranged 0.80 to 1.07 for indices but mg@xmath12 scale factor 0.44 n multiple index measurements same galaxy averaged 140 galaxies effective s / n per ranges 14 to 78 errors low only index measurements with effective @xmath13 per sample 72 galaxies median s / n @xmath14 per paper data obtained same physical aperture size galaxies span @xmath610 distance spectra sample different aperture sizes line indices velocity dispersion exhibit gradients radius necessary to correct parameters to standard aperture generalisation of aperture correction jrgensen franx kjrgaard 1995 scales parameters to circular aperture diameter 1.19 @xmath15 @xmath16 3.4 arcsec at distance of coma strength correction is @xmath17 for @xmath18 mg@xmath12 @xmath19 for zero for correction strengths based on average line strength gradients in early - type galaxies correction strengths similar to jrgensen 1997 use @xmath19 for index jrgensen used @xmath20determine offsets between our line - strength system original lick / ids system worthey 1994 model predictions compared index measurements for 48 galaxies with lick galaxy library @xcite lick / ids aperture was @xmath21 arcsec data corrected to lick / ids aperture using formula jrgensen et al . 1995 ) good agreement between data sets small offsets found see table lick_off figure offset_all match lick / ids system removed offsets from data median measurement errors in indices galaxies in column 4 of table lick_off definition of non - standard line - strength indices see section special_indices ] first column shows name of galaxy if found in ngc or ic catalogues name from corresponding catalogue some galaxies denoted by name from cgcg dressler s catalogue one in godwin metcalfe & peach catalogue second column indicates environment if galaxy member of cluster or group name given for smaller associations galaxies in low density environment or group third column shows effective s / n per of line - strength measurementsvelocity dispersion @xmath22 line - strength indices corrected @xmath23kpc equivalent 34 coma cluster line strength indices calibrated lick ids system corrected zero velocity dispersion exception index calibrated 1993 system mg@xmath12 mag other line strength indices . | 0.432423 | 2,585 | 1,269 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,896 | we study the spectral functions , the poles and their trajectories for increasing @xmath0 of the vector kaon state @xmath1 characterized by @xmath2 , and of the scalar kaons @xmath3 and @xmath4 characterized by @xmath5 . to this end
, we use relativistic qft s lagrangians with both derivative and non - derivative terms . in the vector kaonic sector the spectral function is well approximated by a breit - wigner function : there is one single peak and , correspondingly , a single pole in the complex plane .
on the contrary , in the scalar sector , although the lagrangian contains only one scalar kaonic field , we find two poles , one corresponding to a standard quark - antiquark , , seed state @xmath4 and one to a companion dynamically generate pole @xmath3 .
the latter does not correspond to any peak in the scalar kaonic spectral function , but only to an enhancement in the low - energy regime . | understanding the nature of the mesonic resonances listed in ref .
@xcite is an important topic of both experimental and theoretical hadron physics . in the vector kaonic sector with @xmath2
( @xmath6 stands for isospin , @xmath7 for total spin , and @xmath8 for parity ) , the resonance @xmath9 corresponds very well to the expected quark - antiquark states @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 , @xmath13 ; moreover , its spectral function is nicely described by a ( relativistic ) breit - wigner function . on the contrary ,
the scalar kaonic sector @xmath5 is much more complicated .
two resonance are listed in the pdg below 1.5 gev : the broad but well - established @xmath14 and the very broad and light @xmath3 ( also known as @xmath15 ) , whose existence still requires definitive confirmation ( for discussions , see e.g. refs .
@xcite and refs .
therein ) . the inclusion of @xmath15 in the summary table of pdg would allow to complete the nonet of light scalar states in the energy region below @xmath16 gev .
the aim of this work , based on ref .
@xcite , is to study the nature of the vector and scalar kaonic resonances . by using qft lagrangians ,
we determine the coordinates of the poles on the complex plane and study their nature by using the large-@xmath0 limit .
we confirm that @xmath17 and @xmath18 are standard quark - antiquark states , while @xmath3 is a dynamically generated state .
in order to describe @xmath17 and @xmath14 we introduce relativistic lagrangians that couples them to one kaon and one pion:@xmath19 the expressions above contain non - derivative and derivative interaction terms .
the dots stay for the sum over isospin and hermitian conjugation .
the terms in eq .
( 1 ) naturally emerge as a subset of more complete mesonic models , e.g. ref .
@xcite . according to our models ,
the decay widths of @xmath20 and @xmath21 ( as function of the running mass @xmath22 ) are : @xmath23 f_{\lambda}(m)\text { , } % \]]@xmath24 ^{2}f_{\lambda } ( m)\text { , } % \ ] ] where the form factor @xmath25 has been introduced .
@xmath26 is an energy scale , @xmath27 the three - momentum of one outgoing particle , @xmath28 the kaon mass , and @xmath29 the pion mass .
the on - shell decay widths are obtained by setting @xmath22 to the masses of @xmath20 or @xmath14 : this is accurate in the former case , but quite imprecise in the latter .
the ( scalar part of the ) propagator of the resonances is given by @xmath30 ^{-1}$ ] , where @xmath31 is the bare mass of @xmath32 and @xmath33 is the one - loop contribution .
the spectral function which determines the probability that resonance has a mass between @xmath22 and @xmath34 reads : @xmath35 spectral functions must be normalized to unity . for details of the used formalism , see ref .
@xcite .
the spectral functions of @xmath17 and @xmath14 are shown in fig .
1 . for the vector kaon
we observe a single peak close to @xmath36 gev and a ( unique ! ) pole at @xmath37 gev . in the scalar sector
, there is a broad peak at about @xmath38 gev , but no peak corresponding to the light @xmath15 ( there is only a broad enhancement in the low - energy regime ) . in this channel , it turns out that there are two poles : @xmath39 gev , which corresponds to the seed state @xmath14 , and @xmath40 gev , which corresponds to @xmath3 as an additional companion pole .
the parameters for the scalar channel were determined via a fit to existing pion - kaon data , see ref .
@xcite for details .
we studied the change of the spectral function for different values of the number of colors @xmath0 with the rescaling @xmath41 ( and so for @xmath42 and @xmath43 ) .
when @xmath0 increases , the interaction becomes smaller . in both channels
we observe that the peak becomes narrower and higher .
however , in the scalar sector the enhancement of the @xmath15 becomes smaller for increasing @xmath0 . in fig .
2 we show the trajectories of the poles for increasing @xmath0 .
one sees that the poles of @xmath17 and @xmath14 tend to the real axis , while that of @xmath3 goes away from it and finally disappears for @xmath44 in conclusion , all these results , with special focus on fig .
2 which is the main outcome of the present proceedings , confirm that @xmath3 is a dynamically generated non - quarkonium meson .
we have discussed the nature of @xmath17 , @xmath3 , and @xmath14 by using qft models presented in ref .
we find that @xmath17 and @xmath14 are regular quark - antiquark mesons ( see the quark - model review in @xcite ) . in both cases ,
the spectral function has a well - pronounced peak ; in the large-@xmath0 limit the positions of the poles tend to the real axis , as it should for conventional mesons . on the contrary , @xmath3 does not correspond to a peak of the scalar spectral function , but there is a related pole in the complex plane .
the original lagrangian contains a single scalar field , which is associated to @xmath14 , hence @xmath3 emerges as a companion pole of @xmath14 . in the large-@xmath0 limit the pole of @xmath3 disappears , confirming its non - quarkonium nature .
e. van beveren , t. a. rijken , k. metzger , c. dullemond , g. rupp and j. e. ribeiro , _ z. phys . _ * c30 * , 615 - 620 ( 1986 ) .
d. black , a. h. fariborz , f. sannino and j. schechter , phys . rev .
d * 58 * ( 1998 ) 054012 .
t. wolkanowski , m. soltysiak and f. giacosa , arxiv:1512.01071 [ hep - ph ] .
d. parganlija , p. kovacs , g. wolf , f. giacosa and d. h. rischke , _ phys .
_ * d87 * , 014011 ( 2012 ) ; s. janowski , f. giacosa and d. h. rischke , phys . rev .
d * 90 * ( 2014 ) 11 , 114005 [ arxiv:1408.4921 [ hep - ph ] ] . | mesonic resonances in ref @xcite important topic experimental hadron physics vector kaonic sector with @xmath2 isospin total spin parity resonance @xmath9 corresponds to quark - antiquark states @xmath10 spectral function described by breit - wigner function scalar kaonic sector @xmath5 complicated two resonance in pdg below 1.5 gev broad @xmath14 light @xmath3 @xmath15 requires confirmation inclusion of @xmath15 in summary table pdg light scalar states in energy region below @xmath16 gev aim work study vector scalar kaonic resonances using qft lagrangians determine coordinates poles complex plane study nature large-@xmath0 limit confirm @xmath17 @xmath18 are standard quark - antiquark states @xmath3 dynamically generated state describe @xmath17 @xmath14 introduce relativistic lagrangians to one kaon one pion:@xmath19 expressions contain non - derivative derivative interaction terms dots stay for sum over isospin hermitian conjugation terms in eq . 1 ) emerge as subset of complete mesonic modelsmodels decay widths of @xmath20 @xmath21 running mass @xmath22 are @xmath23@xmath24\lambda form factor @xmath25 introduced @xmath26 energy scale @xmath27 three - momentum particle @xmath28 kaon mass @xmath29 pion mass on - decay widths obtained setting @xmath22 to masses @xmath20 or @xmath14 accurate former imprecise latter scalar propagator resonances by @xmath30 @xmath31 is bare mass of @xmath32 @xmath33 one - loop contribution spectral function probability resonance mass between @xmath22 @xmath34 @xmath35 spectral functions normalized to unity see spectral functions of @xmath17 @xmath14 shown in fig . 1 vector kaon single peak to @xmath36 gev pole at @xmath37 gev scalar sector broad peak at @xmath38 gev no peak light @xmath15 broad enhancement in low - energy regimechannel two poles : @xmath39 gev seed state @xmath14 and @xmath40 gev @xmath3 additional companion pole parameters scalar channel determined via pion - kaon data @xcite studied change spectral function for values number colors @xmath0 with rescaling @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 ) @xmath0 increases interaction smaller both channels peak narrower higher scalar sector enhancement @xmath15 smaller for increasing @xmath0 fig . 2 trajectories poles for increasing @xmath0 poles of @xmath17 and @xmath14 tend to real axis @xmath3 disappears for @xmath44 results fig . 2 confirm @xmath3 is dynamically generated non - quarkonium meson discussed nature of @xmath17 @xmath3 @xmath14 qft models @xmath17 @xmath14 are regular quark - antiquark mesons quark - model review @xcite spectral function has peak large-@xmath0 limit positions poles tend to real axis @xmath3 not correspond to peak scalar spectral function related pole in complex planeoriginal lagrangian single scalar field associated @xmath14 @xmath3 companion pole large-@xmath0 limit pole @xmath3 disappears non - quarkonium nature van beveren rijken metzger dullemond rupp ribeiro . c30 615 - 620 ( 1986 ) black fariborz sannino. rev 58 1998 ) 054012 wolkanowski soltysiak f. giacosa arxiv:1512.01071 hep - ph parganlija kovacs wolf f. giacosa d h. rischke phys d87 014011 ( 2012 ) janowski f. giacosa h rischke phys rev 90 2014 ) 11 114005 arxiv:1408.4921 hep - ph | 0.263815 | 1,589 | 839 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,899 | _ maximum a posteriori _ inference in graphical models is often solved via message - passing algorithms , such as the junction - tree algorithm , or loopy belief - propagation . the exact solution to this problem
is well known to be exponential in the size of the model s maximal cliques after it is triangulated , while approximate inference is typically exponential in the size of the model s factors . in this paper , we take advantage of the fact that many models have maximal cliques that are larger than their constituent factors , and also of the fact that many factors consist entirely of latent variables ( i.e. , they do not depend on an observation ) .
this is a common case in a wide variety of applications , including grids , trees , and ring - structured models . in such cases ,
we are able to decrease the exponent of complexity for message - passing by @xmath0 for both exact _ and _ approximate inference . | it is well - known that exact inference in _ tree - structured _ graphical models can be accomplished efficiently by message - passing operations following a simple protocol making use of the distributive law @xcite .
it is also well - known that exact inference in _ arbitrary _ graphical models can be solved by the junction - tree algorithm ; its efficiency is determined by the size of the maximal cliques after triangulation , a quantity related to the treewidth of the graph .
figure [ fig : examples_intro ] illustrates an attempt to apply the junction - tree algorithm to some graphical models containing cycles . if the graphs are not chordal ( ( a ) and ( b ) ) , they need to be triangulated , or made chordal ( red edges in ( c ) and ( d ) ) .
their clique - graphs are then guaranteed to be _ junction - trees _ , and the distributive law can be applied with the same protocol used for trees ; see @xcite for a beautiful tutorial on exact inference in arbitrary graphs .
although the models in this example contain only pairwise factors , triangulation has increased the size of their maximal cliques , making exact inference substantially more expensive .
hence approximate solutions in the original graph ( such as loopy belief - propagation , or inference in a loopy factor - graph ) are often preferred over an exact solution via the junction - tree algorithm . even when the model s factors are the same size as its maximal cliques , neither exact nor approximate inference algorithms take advantage of the fact that many factors consist only of _ latent _ variables . in many models ,
those factors that are conditioned upon the observation contain fewer latent variables than the purely latent cliques .
examples are shown in figure [ fig : examps ] .
this encompasses a wide variety of models , including grid - structured models for optical flow and stereo disparity as well as chain and tree - structured models for text or speech .
simple analysis reveals that the probability of choosing a permutation that does not contain a value inside a square of size @xmath1 is @xmath2 this is precisely @xmath3 , where @xmath4 is the cumulative density function of @xmath5 .
it is immediately clear that @xmath6 , which defines the best and worst - case performance of algorithm [ alg1 ] .
the case where we are sampling from multiple permutations simultaneously ( i.e. , algorithm [ alg : ext ] ) is analogous .
we consider @xmath9 permutations embedded in a @xmath10-dimensional hypercube , and we wish to find the width of the smallest shaded hypercube that includes exactly one element of the permutations ( i.e. , @xmath11 , \ldots , p_{k-1}[i]$ ] ) .
this is represented in figure [ fig : perms](c ) for @xmath12 .
note carefully that @xmath10 is the number of _ lists _ in ( eq .
[ eq : hatk ] ) ; if we have @xmath10 lists , we require @xmath9 permutations to define a correspondence between them . unfortunately , the probability that there is no non - zero entry in a cube of size @xmath13 is not trivial to compute .
it is possible to write down an expression that generalizes ( eq . [ eq : factprob ] ) , such as @xmath14 ( in which we simply enumerate over all possible permutations and ` count ' which of them do not fall within a hypercube of size @xmath15 ) , and therefore state that @xmath16 however , it is very hard to draw any conclusions from ( eq .
[ eq : pkm ] ) , and in fact it is intractable even to evaluate it for large values of @xmath17 and @xmath10 .
hence we shall instead focus our attention on finding an upper - bound on ( eq . [ eq : runtimeexact ] ) .
finding more computationally convenient expressions for ( eq . [ eq : pkm ] ) and ( eq . [ eq : runtimeexact ] ) remains as future work .
although ( eq . [ eq : runtimek1 ] ) and ( eq . [ eq : runtimeexact ] ) precisely define the running times of algorithm [ alg1 ] and algorithm [ alg : ext ] , it is not easy to ascertain the speed improvements they achieve , as the values to which the summations converge for large @xmath17 are not obvious . here , we shall try to obtain an upper - bound on their performance , which we assessed experimentally in section [ sec : experiments ] .
in doing so we shall prove theorems [ the : alg1 ] and [ the : algext ] .
( see algorithm [ alg1 ] ) consider the shaded region in figure [ fig : perms](d ) .
this region has a width of @xmath19 , and its height @xmath1 is chosen such that it contains precisely one non - zero entry .
let @xmath20 be a random variable representing the height of the grey region needed in order to include a non - zero entry .
we note that @xmath21 our aim is to find the smallest @xmath19 such that @xmath22 .
the probability that none of the first @xmath1 samples appear in the shaded region is @xmath23 next we observe that if the entries in our @xmath24 grid do not define a permutation , but we instead choose a _ random _ entry in each row , then the probability ( now for @xmath25 ) becomes @xmath26 ( for simplicity we allow @xmath1 to take arbitrarily large values ) .
we certainly have that @xmath27 , meaning that @xmath28 is an upper - bound on @xmath29 , and therefore on @xmath30 .
thus we compute the expected value @xmath31 this is just a geometric progression , which sums to @xmath32 .
thus we need to find @xmath19 such that @xmath33 clearly @xmath34 will do .
thus we conclude that @xmath35 ( see algorithm [ alg : ext ] ) we would like to apply the same reasoning in the case of multiple permutations in order to compute a bound on @xmath18 .
that is , we would like to consider @xmath9 _ random _ samples of the digits from @xmath36 to @xmath17 , rather than @xmath9 permutations , as random samples are easier to work with in practice . to do so , we begin with some simple corollaries regarding our previous results .
we have shown that in a permutation of length @xmath17 , we expect to see a value less than or equal to @xmath37 after @xmath38 steps .
there are now @xmath39 other values that are less than or equal to @xmath37 amongst the remaining @xmath40 values ; we note that @xmath41 hence we expect to see the _ next _ value less than or equal to @xmath37 in the next @xmath38 steps also .
a consequence of this fact is that we not only expect to see the _ first _ value less than or equal to @xmath37 earlier in a permutation than in a random sample , but that when we sample @xmath1 elements , we expect _ more _ of them to be less than or equal to @xmath37 in a permutation than in a random sample .
furthermore , when considering the _ maximum _ of @xmath9 permutations , we expect the first @xmath1 elements to contain more values less than or equal to @xmath37 than the maximum of @xmath9 random samples .
( eq . [ eq : pkm ] ) is concerned with precisely this problem .
therefore , when working in a @xmath10-dimensional hypercube , we can consider @xmath9 random samples rather than @xmath9 permutations in order to obtain an upper - bound on ( eq . [ eq : runtimeexact ] ) .
thus we define @xmath25 as in ( eq . [ eq : replace ] ) , and conclude that @xmath42 thus the expected value of @xmath25 is again a geometric progression , which this time sums to @xmath43 .
thus we need to find @xmath44 such that @xmath45 clearly @xmath46 will do .
as mentioned , each step takes @xmath47 , so the final running time is @xmath48 . to summarize , for problems decomposable into @xmath49 groups , we will need to find the index that chooses the maximal product amongst @xmath10 lists ; we have shown an upper - bound on the expected number of steps this takes , namely @xmath50 | exact inference in tree - structured graphical models accomplished by message - passing operations protocol distributive law @xcite inference in arbitrary graphical models solved by junction - tree algorithm efficiency determined by size maximal cliques after triangulation related to treewidth graph figure illustrates junction - tree algorithm to graphical models containing cycles if graphs not chordal need triangulated or made chordal clique - graphs guaranteed to be junction - trees distributive law applied with same protocol for trees see @xcite for tutorial on exact inference in arbitrary graphs models contain pairwise factors triangulation increased size maximal cliques exact inference more expensive approximate solutions in original graph often preferred over exact solution via junction - tree algorithm when model s factors same size as maximal cliques neither exact nor approximate inference algorithms take advantage of many factors latent variables factors conditioned upon observation contain fewer latent variables than latent cliques examples shown in figure models grid - structured models for chain and tree - structured models for text speechanalysis reveals probability choosing permutation value inside square @xmath1 is @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 cumulative density function of @xmath5 @xmath6 defines best worst - case performance of algorithm [ alg1 ] sampling from multiple permutations algorithm [ alg : ext ] analogous consider @xmath9 permutations in @xmath10-dimensional hypercube find smallest hypercube one element permutations @xmath11 represented in figure [ perms(c ) for @xmath12 @xmath10 is number of lists in ( eq hatk ) @xmath10 lists require @xmath9 permutations to define correspondence probability no non - zero entry in cube @xmath13 not trivial to compute possible to write expression generalizes ( eq factprob @xmath14 enumerate possible permutations count which within hypercube @xmath15 @xmath16 hard to draw conclusions from ( eq . pkm ) intractable to evaluate for large values of @xmath17 and @xmath10 focus attention on finding upper - bound on ( eq . runtimeexact ] ) computationally convenient expressions for ( eq pkm and runtimeexact remains future work runtimek1 runtimeexact define running times of algorithm alg1 ext not easy to ascertain speed improvements values summations converge for large @xmath17 not obvious obtain upper - bound on performance assessed experimentally in section experiments prove theorems [ alg1 ] and algext ] algorithm alg1 consider shaded region in figure perms](d ) region width of @xmath19 height @xmath1 chosen contains one non - zero entry @xmath20 random variable height grey region non - zero entry @xmath21 aim to find smallest @xmath19 @xmath22 probability none first @xmath1 samples appear in shaded region is @xmath23 if entries in @xmath24 grid define permutation choose random entry in each probability for @xmath25 becomes @xmath26 allow @xmath1 to take arbitrarily large values @xmath27 @xmath28 is upper - bound on @xmath29 and @xmath30 compute expected value @xmath31 geometric progression sums to @xmath32 need find @xmath19 @xmath33 @xmath34 do conclude @xmath35 algorithm alg ext ] ) apply same reasoning multiple permutations compute bound on @xmath18 consider @xmath9 random samples digits from @xmath36 to @xmath17 permutations easier work begin simple corollaries previous results shown permutation length @xmath17 expect value less than or equal @xmath37 after @xmath38 steps @xmath39 other values less than or equal to @xmath37 remaining @xmath40 values @xmath41 expect next value less than or equal to @xmath37 next @xmath38 steps consequence expect first value less than or equal to @xmath37 earlier permutation sample @xmath1 elements expect more less than or equal to @xmath37 permutation considering maximum @xmath9 permutations expect first @xmath1 elements contain more values less than or equal to @xmath37 than maximum @xmath9 random samples ( eq . pkm concerned problem working @xmath10-dimensional hypercube consider @xmath9 random samples permutations obtain upper - bound on ( eq runtimeexact ) define @xmath25 ( eq .eq replace conclude @xmath42 expected value @xmath25 geometric progression sums to @xmath43 need find @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 do each step takes @xmath47 final running time @xmath48 problems decomposable into @xmath49 groups find index maximal product @xmath10 lists upper - bound expected number steps @xmath50 | 0.31088 | 1,817 | 938 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,900 | recent research has shown that the performance of search personalization depends on the richness of user profiles which normally represent the user s topical interests . in this paper
, we propose a new embedding approach to learning user profiles , where users are embedded on a topical interest space .
we then directly utilize the user profiles for search personalization .
experiments on query logs from a major commercial web search engine demonstrate that our embedding approach improves the performance of the search engine and also achieves better search performance than other strong baselines . | users personal data , such as a user s historic interaction with the search engine ( e.g. , submitted queries , clicked documents ) , have been shown useful to personalize search results to the users information need @xcite .
crucial to effective search personalization is the construction of user profiles to represent individual users interests @xcite .
a common approach is to use main topics discussed in the user s clicked documents @xcite , which can be obtained by using a human generated ontology as in @xcite or using an unsupervised topic modeling technique as in @xcite .
however , using the user profile to directly personalize a search has been not very successful with a _ minor _ improvement @xcite or even _ deteriorate _ the search performance @xcite .
the reason is that each user profile is normally built using only the user s relevant documents ( e.g. , clicked documents ) , ignoring user interest - dependent information related to input queries .
alternatively , the user profile is utilized as a feature of a multi - feature learning - to - rank ( l2r ) framework @xcite . in this case , apart from the user profile , dozens of other features has been proposed as the input of an l2r algorithm @xcite . despite being successful in improving search quality , the contribution of the user profile is not very clear . to handle these problems , in this paper , we propose a new _ embedding _ approach to constructing a user profile , using both the user s input queries and relevant documents .
we represent each user profile using two projection matrices and a user embedding .
the two projection matrices is to identify the user interest - dependent aspects of input queries and relevant documents while the user embedding is to capture the relationship between the queries and documents in this user interest - dependent subspace .
we then _ directly _ utilize the user profile to re - rank the search results returned by a commercial search engine .
experiments on the query logs of a commercial web search engine demonstrate that modeling user profile with embeddings helps to significantly improve the performance of the search engine and also achieve better results than other comparative baselines @xcite do .
we start with our new embedding approach to building user profiles in section [ ssec : profile ] , using pre - learned document embeddings and query embeddings .
we then detail the processes of using an unsupervised topic model ( i.e. , latent dirichlet allocation ( lda ) @xcite ) to learn document embeddings and query embeddings in sections [ ssec : topics ] and [ ssec : query ] , respectively .
we finally use the user profiles to personalize the search results returned by a commercial search engine in section [ ssec : rank ] .
let @xmath0 denote the set of queries , @xmath1 be the set of users , and @xmath2 be the set of documents .
let @xmath3 represent a triple @xmath4 .
the query @xmath5 , user @xmath6 and document @xmath7 are represented by vector embeddings @xmath8 , @xmath9 and @xmath10 , respectively .
our goal is to select a _ score function _
@xmath11 such that the implausibility value @xmath12 of a correct triple @xmath3 ( i.e. @xmath13 is a relevant document of @xmath14 given @xmath15 ) is _ smaller _ than the implausibility value @xmath16 of an incorrect triple @xmath17 ( i.e. @xmath18 is not a relevant document of @xmath19 given @xmath20 ) .
inspired by embedding models of entities and relationships in knowledge bases @xcite , the score function @xmath11 is defined as follows : @xmath21 here we represent the profile for the user @xmath14 by two matrices @xmath22 and @xmath23 and a vector embedding @xmath9 , which represents the user s topical interests .
specifically , we use the interest - specific matrices @xmath22 and @xmath24 to identify the interest - dependent aspects of both query @xmath15 and document @xmath13 , and use vector @xmath9 to describe the relationship between @xmath15 and @xmath13 in this interest - dependent subspace . in this paper , @xmath25 and @xmath8 are pre - determined by employing the lda topic model @xcite , which are detailed in next sections [ ssec : topics ] and [ ssec : query ] .
our model parameters are only the user embeddings @xmath9 and matrices @xmath22 and @xmath24 . to learn these user embeddings and matrices , we minimize the margin - based objective function : @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the margin hyper - parameter , @xmath28 is the training set that contains only correct triples , and @xmath29 is the set of incorrect triples generated by corrupting the correct triple @xmath30 ( i.e. replacing the relevant document / query @xmath31 in @xmath30 by irrelevant documents / queries @xmath32 ) .
we use stochastic gradient descent ( sgd ) to minimize @xmath33 , and impose the following constraints during training : @xmath34 , @xmath35 and @xmath36 .
first , we initialize user matrices as identity matrices and then fix them to only learn the randomly initialized user embeddings . then in the next step
, we fine - tune the user embeddings and user matrices together . in all experiments shown in section [ sec : expsetup ] , we train for 200 epochs during each two optimization step . in this paper
, we model document embeddings by using topics extracted from relevant documents .
we use lda @xcite to _ automatically _ learn @xmath37 topics from the relevant document collection . after training an lda model to calculate the probability distribution over topics for each document , we use the topic proportion vector of each document as its document embedding . specifically , the @xmath38 element ( @xmath39 ) of the vector embedding for document @xmath13 is : @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the probability of the topic @xmath42 given the document @xmath13 .
we also represent each query as a probability distribution @xmath43 over topics , i.e. the @xmath38 element of the vector embedding for query @xmath15 is defined as : @xmath44 where @xmath45 is the probability of the topic @xmath42 given the query @xmath15 .
following @xcite , we define @xmath45 as a mixture of lda topic probabilities of @xmath42 given documents related to @xmath15 .
let @xmath46 be the set of top @xmath47 ranked documents returned for a query @xmath15 ( in the experiments we select @xmath48 ) .
we define @xmath45 as follows : @xmath49 where @xmath50 is the exponential decay function of @xmath51 which is the rank of @xmath52 in @xmath53 .
and @xmath54 is the decay hyper - parameter ( @xmath55 ) .
the decay function is to specify the fact that a higher ranked document is more relevant to user in term of the lexical matching ( i.e. we set the larger mixture weights to higher ranked documents ) .
we utilize the user profiles ( i.e. , the learned user embeddings and matrices ) to re - rank the original list of documents produced by a commercial search engine as follows : ( 1 ) we download the top @xmath47 ranked documents given the input query @xmath15 .
we denote a downloaded document as @xmath13 .
( 2 ) for each document
@xmath13 we apply the trained lda model to infer the topic distribution @xmath56 .
we then model the query @xmath15 as a topic distribution @xmath43 as in section [ ssec : query ] .
( 3 ) for each triple @xmath3 , we calculate the implausibility value @xmath12 as defined in equation [ equa : stranse ] .
we then sort the values in the ascending order to achieve a new ranked list .
* dataset : * we evaluate our new approach using the search results returned by a commercial search engine .
we use a dataset of query logs of of 106 anonymous users in 15 days from 01 july 2012 to 15 july 2012 .
a log entity contains a user identifier , a query , top-@xmath57 urls ranked by the search engine , and clicked urls along with the user s dwell time .
we also download the content documents of these urls for training lda @xcite to learn document and query embeddings ( sections [ ssec : topics ] and [ ssec : query ] ) .
bennett _ et al .
_ @xcite indicate that short - term ( i.e. session ) profiles achieved better search performance than the longer - term profiles .
short - term profiles are usually constructed using the user s search interactions within a search session and used to personalize the search within the session @xcite . to identify a search session , we use 30 minutes of user inactivity to demarcate the session boundary . in our experiments ,
we build short - term profiles and utilize the profiles to personalize the returned results . specifically , we uniformly separate the last log entries within search sessions into a _ test set _ and a _ validation set_. the remainder of log entities within search sessions are used for _ training _ ( e.g. to learn user embeddings and matrices in our approach ) .
* evaluation methodology : * we use the sat criteria detailed in @xcite to identify whether a clicked url is relevant from the query logs ( i.e. , a sat click ) . that is either a click with a dwell time of at least 30 seconds or the last result click in a search session .
we assign a positive ( relevant ) label to a returned url if it is a sat click .
the remainder of the top-10 urls is assigned negative ( irrelevant ) labels .
we use the rank positions of the positive labeled urls as the ground truth to evaluate the search performance before and after re - ranking .
we also apply a simple pre - processing on these datasets as follows . at first , we remove the queries whose positive label set is empty from the dataset . after that
, we discard the domain - related queries ( e.g. facebook , youtube ) . to this end ,
the training set consists of 5,658 correct triples . the test and validation sets contain 1,210 and 1,184 correct triples , respectively .
table [ table:1 ] presents the dataset statistics after pre - processing .
.basic statistics of the dataset after pre - processing [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] by directly learning user profiles and applying them to re - rank the search results , our embedding approach achieves the highest performance of search personalization . specifically , our mrr score is significantly ( @xmath58 ) higher than that of _ sp _ ( with the relative improvement of 4% over sp ) .
likewise , the p@1 score obtained by our approach is significantly higher than that of the baseline _ sp _ ( @xmath59 ) with the relative improvement of 11% . in table
[ tb1 ] , we also present the performances of a simplified version of our embedding approach where we fix the user matrices as identity matrices and then only learn the user embeddings . table [ tb1 ] shows that our simplified version achieves second highest scores compared to all others . )
than our simplified version with 4% relative improvement . ]
specifically , our simplified version obtains significantly higher p@1 score ( with @xmath58 ) than _
in this paper , we propose a new embedding approach to building user profiles .
we model each user profile using a user embedding together with two user matrices .
the user embedding and matrices are then learned using lda - based vector embeddings of the user s relevant documents and submitted queries .
applying it to web search , we use the profile to re - rank search results returned by a commercial web search engine .
our experimental results show that the proposed method can stably and significantly improve the ranking quality . *
acknowledgments * : the first two authors contributed equally to this work .
dat quoc nguyen is supported by an international postgraduate research scholarship and a nicta nrpa top - up scholarship . | users personal data historic interaction with search engine submitted queries clicked documents useful to personalize search results crucial to search personalization is construction of user profiles to represent individual users interests common approach use main topics in user s clicked documents obtained human generated ontology or unsupervised topic modeling technique using user profile to personalize search not successful minor improvement or search performance each user profile built using only s relevant documents ignoring user interest - dependent information input queries alternatively user profile utilized as feature of multi - feature learning - to - rank ( l2r ) framework other features proposed as input of l2r algorithm successful improving search quality contribution of user profile not clear propose new _ embedding _ approach to constructing user profile using user s input queries and relevant documents represent each user profile using two projection matrices and user embedding projection matrices identify user interest - dependent aspects of input queries relevant documents user embedding relationship between queries documents utilize user profile to re - rank search results commercial search engine experiments modeling user profile with embeddings performance search engine better results than comparative baselinesstart new embedding approach building user profiles section ssec profile using pre - learned document embeddings query embeddings detail processes using unsupervised topic model latent dirichlet allocation learn document embeddings query embeddings sections ssec : topics query ] use user profiles personalize search results commercial search engine section ssec : rank @xmath0 queries @xmath1 users @xmath2 documents @xmath3 represent triple @xmath4 query @xmath5 user @xmath6 document @xmath7 represented vector embeddings @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 goal select score function @xmath11 implausibility value @xmath12 correct triple @xmath3 smaller than value @xmath16 incorrect triple @xmath17 inspired embedding models entities relationships knowledge bases score function @xmath11 defined @xmath21 represent profile user @xmath14 two matrices @xmath22 @xmath23 vector embedding @xmath9 represents user s topical interestsuse interest - specific matrices @xmath22 @xmath24 identify aspects query @xmath15 document @xmath13 use vector @xmath9 describe relationship between @xmath25 @xmath8 pre - determined lda topic model @xcite detailed in sections topics query model parameters user embeddings @xmath9 matrices @xmath22 @xmath24 minimize margin - based objective function : @xmath26 margin hyper - parameter @xmath28 training set correct triples @xmath29 incorrect triples corrupting correct triple @xmath30 irrelevant use stochastic gradient descent minimize @xmath33 impose constraints during training : @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 initialize user matrices as identity matrices fix to learn randomly initialized user embeddings fine - tune user embeddings matrices train for 200 epochs during each optimization step model document embeddings using topics extracted from relevant documents use lda @xcite learn @xmath37 topics from relevant document collection after training lda model calculate probability distribution over topics for each document use topic proportion vector of each document as document embedding@xmath38 element embedding document @xmath13 is @xmath40 @xmath41 probability topic @xmath42 represent each query as probability distribution @xmath43 over topics @xmath38 element query @xmath15 @xmath44 @xmath45 probability topic @xmath42 @xmath45 mixture of lda topic probabilities of @xmath42 documents related @xmath15 @xmath46 set top @xmath47 ranked documents for query @xmath15 select @xmath48 define @xmath45 @xmath49 @xmath50 is exponential decay function of @xmath51 rank of @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 decay hyper - parameter @xmath55 ) higher ranked document more relevant user lexical matching larger mixture weights higher ranked documents user profiles to re - rank original list documents search engine download top @xmath47 ranked documents input query @xmath15 denote downloaded document as @xmath13 each document @xmath13 apply lda model infer topic distribution @xmath56 model query @xmath15 as topic distribution @xmath43each triple @xmath3 calculate implausibility value @xmath12 defined in equation stranse sort values ascending order new ranked list evaluate new approach using search results commercial search engine use dataset of query logs of 106 anonymous users 15 days from 01 july 2012 to 15 july 2012 log entity contains user identifier query top-@xmath57 urls ranked clicked urls user s dwell time download content documents urls for training @xcite learn document query embeddings bennett @xcite indicate short - term session profiles better search performance than longer - term profiles profiles constructed using user s search interactions session personalize search session identify search session use 30 minutes user inactivity demarcate session boundary build short - term profiles personalize returned results separate last log entries sessions into test set validation set_ remainder log entities for training user embeddings matrices evaluation methodology use sat criteria @xcite identify clicked url relevant from query logs sat click click with dwell time 30 seconds or last result click in search session assign positive ( relevant ) label to returned url if sat clickremainder top-10 urls assigned negative irrelevant labels use rank positions positive labeled urls evaluate search performance before after re - ranking apply pre - processing on datasets remove queries positive label set empty discard domain - related queries facebook youtube training set consists 5,658 correct triples test and validation sets contain 1,210 1,184 correct triples table presents dataset statistics after pre - processing learning user profiles applying re - rank search results our embedding approach achieves highest performance search personalization mrr score @xmath58 higher than _ sp _ relative improvement 4% over sp p@1 score higher than baseline _ sp _ ( @xmath59 ) relative improvement 11% table tb1 performances of simplified version embedding approach fix user matrices as identity matrices learn user embeddings simplified version achieves second highest scores with 4% relative improvement simplified version obtains higher p@1 score with @xmath58 ) propose new embedding approach to building user profiles model each user profile using user embedding with two user matricesuser embedding matrices learned using lda - based vector embeddings documents queries web search profile re - rank results commercial search engine experimental results show proposed method ranking quality first two authors contributed quoc nguyen supported international postgraduate research scholarship nicta nrpa top - up scholarship | 0.437716 | 2,610 | 1,293 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,926 | we study thermoelectric effects in kondo correlated quantum dot coupled to ferromagnetic electrodes by calculating thermopower s in the kondo regime as function of on - dot energy level and temperature .
the system is represented by the anderson model and the results agree well with those recently measured for a quantum dot coupled to nonmagnetic leads . for magnetic electrodes
one observes marked dependence of s on the degree of their polarization .
, , quantum dot , thermopower , kondo effect 75.20.hr , 72.15.qm , 72.25.-b , 73.23.hk transport properties of artificial nanostructures with highly correlated electrons present fruitful research area .
in particular the many body effects have been predicted @xcite and later observed @xcite in quantum dots coupled to external leads .
such structures allow study of various physical phenomena in well controlled conditions and geometries .
number of possibilities have already been tested experimentally resulting in discoveries of new effects @xcite . in this contribution
we are interested in the study of the voltage @xmath0 across quantum dot induced by the temperature gradient characterised by @xmath1 .
the ratio @xmath2 is a measure of the thermopower @xmath3 .
we consider single quantum dot with only one energy level coupled to two external ferromagnetic leads .
the second electron on the dot experiences strong repulsion @xmath4 due to charging energy @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the capacitance of the dot .
we model the system by the @xmath7 single impurity anderson hamiltonian in the slave boson representation and adopt the calculation scheme and the approximations presented previously in @xcite .
@xmath8 where @xmath9 ( @xmath10 ) denotes left ( right ) lead , @xmath11 ( @xmath12 ) is the creation ( annihilation ) operator for a conduction electron with the wave vector @xmath13 , spin @xmath14 in the lead @xmath15 and @xmath16 is the hybridization matrix element between localized electron on the dot with the energy @xmath17 and conduction electron of energy @xmath18 in the lead @xmath15 . the non - equilibrium green s function technique @xcite allows one to study the general situation with arbitrary value of the @xmath1 . here , however , we limit our consideration to the linear response .
this means that the response coefficients @xmath19 between charge and heat fluxes and chemical potential and temperature gradients are evaluated for an equilibrium ( @xmath20 ) system with constant temperature ( @xmath21 ) .
electrical conductance @xmath22 is given by the coefficient @xmath23 as @xmath24 , while thermopower requires knowledge of both @xmath23 and @xmath25 and is given by @xmath26 .
the linear response coefficients read @xmath27 @xmath28 ): @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
polarisation of the leads @xmath32 ( upper panel ) and @xmath33 ( lower panel ) .
splitting of the kondo resonance results in a very small thermopower.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=38.0% ] ): @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
polarisation of the leads @xmath32 ( upper panel ) and @xmath33 ( lower panel ) .
splitting of the kondo resonance results in a very small thermopower.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=38.0% ] as it has already been noted in @xcite in the context of n - qd - n system , the thermopower s is a powerful characteristic to identify the appearance of the kondo effect as it changes sign when the system is cooled down to temperatures @xmath34 below @xmath35 .
this is particularly clear in fig .
[ fig1 ] and in fig .
[ fig2 ] ( solid curve ) , where s vanishes for temperature equal actual kondo temperature @xmath35 .
the behaviour is more complicated in the fm - qd - fm system with nonzero polarisation ( lower panel of fig .
[ fig1 ] and fig .
[ fig2 ] ) .
it is worth to note that the thermopower of the quantum dot defined in the two dimensional electron gas has recently been measured experimentally @xcite and qualitatively agrees with that presented in figure [ fig1 ] for @xmath36 . to understand their results the authors @xcite use the mott formula , which states that thermopower is proportional to the logarithmic derivative of the conductance with respect to the energy evaluated at the actual fermi energy .
the kondo effect shows up as additional maximum appearing in conductance @xmath37 quantum dot when the temperature decreases .
it is connected with the abrikosov - suhl resonance ( resonances ) in the density of states , which appears ( appear ) at low temperatures and is ( are ) located at the position(s ) of the fermi level of the leads in ( non)equilibrium situation .
the slope of conductance thus changes and the thermopower changes sign .
thermopower measured directly and obtained from the mott formula differ in line shapes @xcite and this calls for the discussion of the validity of mott formula @xcite in the interacting quantum dot systems .
this as well as detailed comparison between experimental data and calculations will be the subject of future work . in magnetically polarised systems
the abrikosov - suhl resonance splits ( as in external b field @xcite ) and this results in decrease of low temperature s ( fig .
[ fig1 ] ) . | this work has been supported by the polish mnii under the contract pbz - min - p03/2003 .
99 l. i. glazman , m. e. raikh , jetp lett . *
47 * , 452 ( 1988 ) ; t. k. ng , p. a. lee , phys . rev . lett . * 61 * , 1768 ( 1988 ) .
d. goldhaber - gordon _ et al .
_ , nature * 391 * , 158 ( 1998 ) ; s. m. cronenwett _
et al . _ ,
science * 281 * , 540 ( 1998 ) .
kouwenhoven , l. glazman , physics world , * jan . * , 33 ( 2001 ) . m. krawiec , k. i. wysokiski , solid state commun . * 115 * , 141 ( 2000 ) ; supercond .
* 17 * , 103 ( 2004 ) .
l. v. keldysh , sov .
jetp * 20 * , 10 108 ( 1965 ) ; h. haug , a. p. yauho , _ quantum kinetics in transport and optics of semiconductors _ , springer , berlin ( 1996 ) .
d. boese , r. fazio , europhys . lett . * 56 * , 576 ( 2001 ) ; b. dong , x. l. lei , j. phys . : condens .
matter * 14 * , 11747 ( 2002 ) .
r. scheibner _
_ cond - mat_/0410671 ( 2004 ) .
a. m. lunde and k. flensberg , j. phys . : condens .
matter * 17 * 3879 ( 2005 ) . | work supported polish mnii contract pbz - min - p03/2003 glazman raikh jetp lett 47 452 ( 1988 ) ng lee phys . rev. 61 1768 ( 1988 ) goldhaber - gordon nature 391 158 ( 1998 ) cronenwett science 281 540 ( 1998 ) kouwenhoven glazman world 33 ( 2001 ) krawiec wysokiski solid state commun 115 141 ( 2000 ) supercond 17 103 ( 2004 ) keldysh jetp 20 10 108 ( 1965 ) haug yauho quantum kinetics transport optics semiconductors springer berlin ( 1996 ) boese fazio europhys. lett 56 576 ( 2001 ) dong lei phys condens matter 14 11747 ( 2002 ) cond - mat_/0410671 ( 2004 ) lunde flensberg phys condens matter 17 3879 ( 2005 ) | 0.074734 | 421 | 227 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,927 | quasi - eikonal and quasi - u - matrix unitarization of the standard regge - pole amplitude for @xmath0 have been considered .
we show that some violation of unitarity even at high energy exists in both models . we have found in quasi - eikonal model a bump - oscillation structure of @xmath1 at large values of impact parameter @xmath2 but where @xmath1 is closed to the maximal value .
we argue that it is possible to choose the parameter regulating deviation of generalized models from pure eikonal or u - matrix modes in order to restore unitarity .
it was shown in the recent paper @xcite that the impact - parameter amplitude @xmath3 extracted from @xmath4 elastic scattering data of the totem experiment at @xmath5 tev @xcite exceeds the black disk ( bdl ) limit @xmath6 .
we define @xmath3 as the following transformation of standard scattering amplitude ( at high @xmath7 ) @xmath8 the extracted data for @xmath1 at @xmath5 tev are shown in fig .
[ fig : imhdata ] ( the figure is taken from the @xcite ) .
extracted from the totem @xmath9 data at @xmath107 tev , title="fig : " ] + this result , provided that it will be confirmed at higher energies ( 8 , 13 , 14 tev at lhc ) , leads to the important consequences for many phenomenological models constructed within a hypothesis that the bdl regime is realized in hadron elastic scattering at high energy .
first of all it concerns with a widely explored eikonal model @xmath11 where usually and in accordance with regge approach an input amplitudes @xmath12 and @xmath13 are assumed to have the following properties .
* amplitude @xmath12 is presumably imaginary at least at small @xmath14 .
* amplitude @xmath15 where @xmath16 and @xmath17 gev at fixed impact parameter @xmath2 and at @xmath18 . * amplitude @xmath19 at @xmath20 where @xmath21 and @xmath22 . )
the impact - parameter amplitude must have an exponential , @xmath23 , where @xmath24 is a constant , rather than gauss behavior caused by contribution of regge pole with linear trajectory . ]
then it can be concluded that the unitarized amplitude @xmath25 at @xmath18 is coming close to 1/2 at @xmath26 and going to zero at @xmath20 as shown in fig .
[ fig : imh ] . + in another unitarization method , @xmath27-matrix unitarization @xcite , the output amplitude @xmath28 is expressed through @xmath13 by the following equation @xmath29 at @xmath30 the impact - parameter amplitude @xmath31 because @xmath32 .
the height of a step in @xmath3 is not equal to 1 at any value of @xmath7 but it goes to 1 when @xmath18 . thus the @xmath27-matrix unitarization does not lead to any contradiction with above mentioned impact - parameter analysis of the totem data while in the eikonal method the maximal value of amplitude @xmath33 conflicts with the above mentioned analysis of the totem data .
is it possible to fix the problem in eikonal or eikonal - type approach ?
several modifications and generalizations of the eikonal as well as of the u - matrix methods have been suggested and explored long ago and recently @xcite . in what follows
we will concentrate on two models , quasi - eikonal @xcite and quasi-@xmath27-matrix .
they possess some interest and importance because a choice of additional parameter in these models allows to obtain asymptotical regime with the maximal value of the impact amplitude step between 1/2 and 1 , i.e @xmath34 .
it is worthwhile to remind that the both models can be treated on the unique basis by summing multireggeon exchanges in @xmath7-channel or multiple rescatterings .
namely , elastic scattering amplitude at high @xmath7 can be written as sum of @xmath35-pomeron exchanges .
@xmath36 where @xmath37 the function @xmath38 is the vertex function that describes an interaction of two hadrons with @xmath35 pomerons , each of them being characterized by the impact parameter @xmath39 .
the simplest assumption is that @xmath38 depends only on number of pomerons , @xmath35 .
then we define @xmath40 and obtain @xmath41 let us consider two explicit forms of @xmath42 . assuming the first form @xmath43 one can immediately have the quasi - eikonal ( qe ) model @xcite ( in the pure eikonal model @xmath44 equals to 1 ) @xmath45 the second assumption that @xmath46 leads to quasi-@xmath27-matrix ( qu ) model ( in the original pure @xmath27-matrix model @xcite @xmath47 equals to 1/2 ) .
then @xmath48 it follows from eqs .
( [ eq : qe],[eq : qu ] ) that @xmath49 ) at @xmath18 and @xmath50 .
then from the unitarity inequality @xmath51 we have @xmath52 . thus , if @xmath53 then @xmath54 at @xmath18 in the region @xmath55 .
many pro and contra arguments concerning qe - model were discussed in @xcite . in the present paper
we give some additional arguments that such a model can be consistent with unitarity restrictions on @xmath3 .
we would like to notice that the result of unitarization depends on both ingredients : input amplitude @xmath12 ( or @xmath13 ) and scheme that determines a dependence of output amplitude @xmath3 on input @xmath13 .
we would like to notice that it is not necessary to require ( as is mentioned in @xcite ) that the whole upper semi - plane ( @xmath56 ) must be mapped under unitarization to the unitarity circle in ( @xmath57 ) .
such a requirement can be valid only for a part of the semi - plane ( @xmath56 ) depending on the specific model for input @xmath13 .
any scheme does not guaranty the correct properties of @xmath3 for an arbitrary @xmath58 .
however , it is necessary for output amplitude to satisfy the unitarity requirements . from the unitarity equation @xmath59 where @xmath60 takes into account a contribution of inelastic processes , which is positive at @xmath61 ( for the sake of simplicity we consider identical hadrons with mass @xmath24 ) .
unitarity imposes some restrictions on the both ingredients @xmath3 and @xmath13 of the unitarization scheme .
it follows from a positivity of @xmath62 that @xmath63 let us consider now a quasi - eikonal model ( [ eq : qe ] ) with @xmath64 and take a contribution of simple regge pole defined in eq .
( [ eq : inputp ] ) as input amplitude .
inequality @xmath65 makes no sense because in this case @xmath66 at @xmath18 , that is not supported by data . of course
, other contributions ( @xmath67 reggeons , for example ) are important at not very high energy , but at energies @xmath68 exceeding or approximately equal to few hundred gev they are very small and can be neglected in the given qualitative analyses .
let rewrite @xmath3 as follows @xmath69=-i(-1+\mu c+i\mu s)/2\lambda\ ] ] where @xmath70 .
the inequality ( [ eq : unitar - ineq ] ) in terms of @xmath71 and @xmath72 has the form @xmath73
\1 . if @xmath74 and @xmath75 then @xmath76 and @xmath77 , inequality ( [ eq : ineq-0 ] ) is read as @xmath78 .
\2 . if @xmath20 then @xmath79 and @xmath80 independently of energy and @xmath81 . obviously that in this case @xmath82 at any @xmath81 if @xmath83 .
one can show that the above two conclusions 1 . and 2 .
are still valid for the qu - model ( [ eq : qu ] ) as well .
\3 .
it is impossible to analyze analytically the unitarity inequalities at nonasymptotic energy and in a region of @xmath2 where @xmath3 is rapidly decreasing .
that is why we calculate numerically @xmath1 and @xmath60 at some typical parameters of input amplitude @xmath13 , eq .
( [ eq : inputp ] ) . to this end
we have fixed parameters @xmath84 and @xmath85 ( given in gev@xmath86 ) .
their values and results obtained for @xmath1 and @xmath60 with various parameters @xmath87 as well as energy @xmath68 ( gev ) are shown in figs .
[ fig : h - violation],[fig : h - e - u - s],[fig : h(b - b0)],[fig : h - evsqe ] .
* we have found that unitarity inequalities ( [ eq : unitarity ] ) and ( [ eq : unitar - ineq ] ) are violated at `` low '' energy in both models ( qe at @xmath88 and qu at @xmath89 ) .
it is well pronounced if the bare pole intercept @xmath90 in qe - model and @xmath91 ( see fig .
[ fig : h - violation ] ) .
it is not clear how to fix the problem .
maybe a nonlinear trajectory of pomeron or an additional ( non regge - pole ? ) term in @xmath13 can help . *
the violation is saving in qe - model while it is absent in qu - model at increasing energy .
( fig .
[ fig : h - e - u - s ] ) .
the violation is small but it exists . let us consider a region @xmath92 , where @xmath93 is determined from the following equation @xmath94=0.\ ] ] + in qe- and u - models , ] + and @xmath60 in qe - model ( left ) and u - model ( right ) at various energies ( values of @xmath95 are indicated near the curves @xmath1 ) . ]
+ ) at various energies with @xmath96 , @xmath97-values are given in figure , corresponding curves are pointed by arrows .
@xmath98 .
calculations were made with parameters : @xmath99 .
the red line illustrates @xmath1 in pure eikonal model ( @xmath100 ) at @xmath101 ] * one can see ( fig . [
fig : h(b - b0 ) ] ) a bump followed by small oscillations ( they can be seen well on the larger scale of the figure ) above @xmath102 in qe - model at @xmath103 .
it is important to notice that such a bump appears as well in the pure eikonal model with @xmath100 but above @xmath33 .
it is illustrated in fig .
[ fig : h(b - b0 ) ] on the right panel .
thus we conclude that the black disk bound @xmath104 is violated in the pure eikonal unitarization of a simple pole with a linear trajectory and @xmath0 .
we would like to notice that the same oscillation - bump structure exists in another generalization of e- and u - models considered in @xcite @xmath105.\ ] ] it interpolates between qu - model ( at @xmath106 ) and qe - model ( at @xmath107 ) .
this structure appears at @xmath108 if input amplitude @xmath13 is the contribution of simple pomeron pole with line trajectory and @xmath0 .
* the second important observation consists in a constant height of bump in a huge energy interval from ( @xmath109 up to @xmath110 ) and most likely at higher @xmath7 ) .
it can be verified that bump height depends on @xmath111 while it does not depend on energy at very high @xmath7 .
the same structure is appeared as well if pomeron trajectory is nonlinear ( for example if @xmath112 ) .
however there is no such a structure if a term @xmath113 ( where @xmath93 is constant ) is added to @xmath13 . *
it follows from these listed properties that unitarity violation in qe - model can be eliminated by an appropriate choice of @xmath44 , that is demonstrated in fig .
[ fig : h - evsqe ] .
the minimal value of @xmath44 is larger than 1/2 and depends on the input pomeron intercept @xmath114 . and
@xmath60 by changing @xmath44 in qe - model ] | basing on the performed numerical analysis of the considered explicit examples for input amplitudes we can claim that * quasieikonal unitarization model under suitable choice of @xmath44 allows to describe scattering amplitude beyond the black disk limit . *
both the qe and qu unitarization schemes can describe a possible ( hypothetic ) regime of hadron interaction where @xmath115 at @xmath18 and @xmath116 .
* it is important to check out carefully ( at least numerically ) how the unitarity bounds for @xmath3 are satisfied when specific model for input amplitude @xmath13 is taken .
* input simple pomeron pole must be modified before unitarization is applied in order to avoid an oscillation of @xmath117 in a region where @xmath118 .
author thanks s.m .
troshin for many challenging and fruitful discussions .
the work is supported by the department of nuclear physics and power engineering of the national academy of sciences of ukraine ( grant no co-2 - 1/2014 ) .
99 a. alkin , o. kovalenko , e. martynov , s.m .
troshin , phys.rev . *
d89 * ( 2014 ) 091501(r ) .
g. antchev _
et al . _ ,
totem collaboration , europhys .
* 101 * ( 2013 ) 21002 .
gribov , the theory of complex angular momentum , cambridge university press , 2003 .
troshin , n.e .
tyurin , phys . lett .
* b 316 * ( 1993 ) 175 ; int .
phys . * a 22 * ( 2007 ) 4437 .
ter - martirosyan , pisma zh .
exp theor phys .
* 15 * ( 1972 ) 734 .
glushko , n.a .
kobylinsky , e.s .
martynov , v.p.shelest , yad . fiz .
* 38 * ( 1983 ) 180 .
p. desgrolard , m. giffon , e. martynov , e. predazzi , z. phys . *
c 76 * ( 1997 ) 155 . o. v. selyugin , j .-
cudell , e. predazzi , eur.phys.j.st * 162 * ( 2008 ) 37 .
cudell , e. predazzi , o.v .
selyugin , phys.rev . *
d79 * ( 2009 ) 034033 .
kancheli , arxiv : hep - ph/1309.5860v2 ( 2014 ) .
anisovich , v.a .
nikonov , j. nyiri , arxiv : hep - ph/1408.0692 ( 2014 ) .
troshin , arxiv : hep - ph/0712.3359v2 ( 2008 ) . | numerical analysis input amplitudes quasieikonal unitarization model @xmath44 scattering amplitude beyond black disk limit qe qu unitarization schemes describe hadron interaction @xmath115 @xmath18 @xmath116 important check unitarity bounds @xmath3 model input amplitude @xmath13 pomeron pole modified before unitarization avoid oscillation @xmath117 @xmath118 thanks s troshin discussions work supported department nuclear physics power engineering national academy sciences ukraine grant no co-2 - 1/2014 ) alkin kovalenko martynov troshin.rev . d89 ( 2014 ) 091501(r ) antchev totem collaboration europhys . 101 2013 ) 21002 gribov theory complex angular momentum cambridge university press 2003 troshin tyurin phys . lett . 316 1993 ) 175 int. phys . 22 ( 2007 ) 4437 ter - martirosyan theor phys . 15 1972 ) 734 glushko kobylinsky martynov.shelest fiz 38 ( 1983 ) 180 desgrolard giffon e. martynov predazzi z.76 1997 ) 155 selyugin cudell predazzi eur.phys.j.st 162 2008 ) 37 cudell predazzi selyugin.rev d79 2009 ) 034033 kancheli hep - ph/1309.5860v2 2014 ) nikonov nyiri hep ph/1408.0692 2014 troshin hep - ph/0712.3359v2 2008 ) | 0.129321 | 651 | 356 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,932 | in this paper we have calculated the associate norms of the @xmath0 generalized classical lorentz spaces . | this paper aims at calculating the associate norm of the generalized classical lorentz spaces .
we have used the characterization of the weighted reverse hardy inequality to calculate the associate norm of the spaces @xmath0 .
let @xmath1 be a measurable subset of @xmath2 .
we denote by @xmath3 the class of all measurable functions @xmath4 defined on @xmath1 for which @xmath5 @xmath6 and denote by @xmath7 the weak @xmath8 space such that @xmath9 where @xmath10 denotes the distribution function of @xmath11 given by @xmath12 let for @xmath13 and @xmath14 @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the decreasing rearrangement of @xmath4 defined by @xmath17 we denote by @xmath18 be the set of all extended real valued @xmath19-measurable functions on @xmath2 and @xmath20 the set of all non - negative measurable functions on @xmath21 , @xmath22 the set of all non - decreasing functions from @xmath23 .
now we recall definitions of lorentz , classical lorentz and generalized classical lorentz spaces .
[ cay2 ] the lorentz space @xmath24 , @xmath13 is the collection of all measurable functions @xmath4 on @xmath25 such the quantity @xmath26 is finite .
note that @xmath27 ( see , for example , @xcite ) .
note that , @xmath28 for @xmath29 .
if @xmath30 or @xmath31 , then the functional @xmath32 is a norm . for @xmath33
we have , with continuous embeddings , that @xmath34 the function @xmath35 $ ] is defined as @xmath36 in the case @xmath37 , we give a functional @xmath38 by @xmath39 ( with the usual modification if @xmath40 , @xmath41 ) which is a norm on @xmath42 for @xmath43 , @xmath44 or @xmath31 . if @xmath45 @xmath46 , then @xmath47 about @xmath48 lorentz spaces see @xcite .
let @xmath49 and @xmath50 .
we denote by @xmath51 the classical lorentz spaces , the spaces of all measurable functions with finite quasinorm @xmath52 therefore the following statement @xmath53 is valid . the spaces @xmath54 were introduced by lorentz in 1951 in @xcite .
spaces whose norms involve @xmath55 appeared explicitly for the first time in calderon s paper @xcite . in @xcite sawyer give description of the dual of @xmath56 .
lorentz @xcite proved that , for @xmath57 , @xmath58 is a norm if and only if @xmath59 is nonincreasing .
the class of weights for which @xmath58 is merely equivalent to a banach norm is however considerably larger .
in fact it consists of all those weights w which , for some @xmath60 and all @xmath61 , satisfy @xmath62 ( @xcite , theorem 4 ] , see also @xcite ) , or @xmath63 ( @xcite , theorem 2.3 ) .
in @xcite , theorem 1.1 ( see also @xcite , corollary 2.2 , @xcite , p. 6 ) it was observed that the functional @xmath58 ; @xmath64 , does not have to be a quasinorm .
it was shown that it is a quasinorm if and only if the function @xmath65 satisfies the @xmath66-condition , i.e. , @xmath67 in @xcite were given necessary and sufficient conditions for @xmath56 to be a linear space .
about historical developments classical lorentz spaces see @xcite .
let @xmath49 and let @xmath68 .
we denote by @xmath69 the generalized lorentz spaces , the spaces of all measurable functions with finite quasinorm @xmath70 let @xmath40 and let @xmath68 .
we denote by @xmath71 the generalized classical lorentz spaces , the spaces of all measurable functions with finite quasinorm @xmath72 therefore the following statement @xmath73 @xmath74 is valid .
note that , the space @xmath75 we called generalized lebesgue spaces .
recall the definition of generalized marcinkiewicz space @xmath76 where the supremum is taken for all measurable subset of @xmath2 .
it easy to see that @xmath77 therefore , we have @xmath78 and @xmath79 .
[ geyd1 ] note that , the classical lorentz space @xmath51 is not a linear space , therefore the generalized classical lorentz spaces @xmath71 are also not linear spaces in general .
it is easy to see that the condition @xmath80 is sufficient for the generalized classical lorentz spaces @xmath71 to be a quasinorm space . also the condition @xmath81 or @xmath82 is sufficient for the generalized classical lorentz spaces @xmath71 to be a norm space .
the problems mentioned in the remark [ geyd1 ] are not as easy as the problems in the case of the classical lorentz spaces . at this point
it s required to have the characterizations of the embedding between these generalized classical lorentz spaces and the boundedness of the maximal operator in these spaces .
we havent got the solution of these problems yet .
to solve these problems it will be useful to find the characterizations of the associate spaces of the generalized classical lorentz spaces .
in this paper we give the characterizations of the associate spaces of these spaces .
note that , in the special case @xmath83 the generalized lorentz space @xmath69 was introduced and investigated in @xcite .
let @xmath84 be a set of functions from @xmath85 endowed with a positively homogenous functional @xmath86 defined for every @xmath87 and such that @xmath88 if and only if @xmath89 , we define the associate space @xmath90 of @xmath84 as the set of all functions @xmath87 such that @xmath91 , where @xmath92 in what follows we assume @xmath93 and @xmath94 .
[ prp1](@xcite , p. 58 ) let @xmath95 be a rearrangement - invariant function norm over a resonant measure space @xmath96 .
then the associate norm @xmath97 is also rearrangement invariant .
furthermore , @xmath98 holds . throughout the paper ,
we write @xmath99 if there exists a positive constant @xmath60 , independent of appropriate quantities such as functions , satisfying @xmath100 .
we write @xmath101 when @xmath99 and @xmath102 .
let us recall some results from @xcite .
let @xmath103 and @xmath59 will denote weights , that is , locally integrable non - negative functions on @xmath21 .
we set , once and for all @xmath104 we assume that @xmath105 for every @xmath106 .
we then denote @xmath107 when @xmath108 ( hence @xmath109 ) , we will omit the subscript u. furthermore , for given @xmath110 and every @xmath87 , the necessary and sufficient conditions for the inequality @xmath111 were established in @xcite .
let @xmath112 be a continuous strictly increasing function on @xmath113 such that @xmath114 and @xmath115 .
then we say @xmath112 is admissible .
let @xmath112 be an admissible function .
we say that a function @xmath116 is @xmath112-quasiconcave if @xmath116 is equivalent to a non - decreasing function on @xmath113 and @xmath117 is equivalent to a non - increasing function on @xmath21 .
we say that a @xmath112-quasiconcave function @xmath116 is non - degenerate if @xmath118 the family of non - degenerate @xmath112-quasiconcave functions will be denoted by @xmath119 .
let @xmath103 be weights above and let @xmath120 defined by @xmath121 then , @xmath122 let @xmath120 be an admissible function and let @xmath123 be a non - negative borel measure on @xmath113 .
we say that the function @xmath116 defined as @xmath124 fundamental function of the measure @xmath123 with respect to @xmath120 .
we will also say that the function @xmath123 is a representation measure of @xmath116 with respect to @xmath120 .
we say that @xmath123 is non - degenerate if the following conditions are satisfied for every @xmath106 : @xmath125}\frac{d\nu(s)}{\sigma(s)}= \int_{[1,\infty)}d\nu(s)=\infty.\ ] ] let @xmath120 be an admissible function and let @xmath123 be a non - negative non - degenerate borel measure on @xmath113 .
let @xmath116 be the fundamental function of @xmath123 with respect to @xmath120 .
then @xmath126 and also @xmath127}d\nu(s)+\sigma(t)\int_{[t,\infty]}\frac{d\nu(s)}{\sigma(s ) } , t\in(0,\infty).\ ] ] [ mak1 ] @xcite let @xmath128 and let @xmath129 be weights .
assume that @xmath130 is such that @xmath131 is admissible .
let @xmath120 defined by , be non - degenerate with respect to @xmath131 .
let @xmath123 be the representation measure of @xmath132 with respect to @xmath133 .
\(i ) if @xmath134 , then holds for all @xmath4 if and only if @xmath135 moreover , the optimal constant @xmath60 in satisfies @xmath136 .
\(ii ) if @xmath137 , then holds for all @xmath4 if and only if @xmath138 where @xmath139 moreover , the optimal constant in satisfies @xmath140 .
the associated spaces of classical lorentz spaces @xmath141 was calculated in @xcite .
[ abdfk ] let @xmath142 , @xmath143 , @xmath149 and @xmath150 .
then the associate spaces of @xmath0 are described as follows : + ( i ) if @xmath144 , then @xmath151 where @xmath123 is the representation measure of @xmath152 with respect to @xmath153 .
+ ( ii ) if @xmath147 , then @xmath154 where @xmath123 is the representation measure of @xmath152 with respect to @xmath155 . from proposition [ prp1 ]
we have @xmath156 if we take @xmath157 , then we can write @xmath158^{1/p}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we define the function @xmath159 , then we get @xmath160 therefore @xmath161^{1/p } & \approx\left[\sup\limits_{h\geq 0}\frac{\left(\int_{0}^{\infty}f^{*}(t)h^{*}(t)^{\frac{1}{p}}dt\right)^{p } } { \sup\limits_{r>0}\varphi(r)^{p}\psi_p^p(r)h_{u}^{**}(r)}\right]^{1/p}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] \i ) @xmath182 @xmath183 where @xmath123 is the representation measure of @xmath152 with respect to @xmath184 .
+ ( ii ) if @xmath185 , then @xmath186 where @xmath123 is the representation measure of @xmath152 with respect to @xmath187 . using a simple observation function ,
it is obvious that @xmath4 is decreasing if and only if , @xmath188 is decreasing for all @xmath189 .
we see that the embedding holds if and only if the following embedding holds @xmath190 one can get the required result by using theorem [ abdfk ] .
this paper has been written during the visit of a. gogatishvili to ankara university in ankara and to ahi - evran university in kirsehir . a special gratitude he gives to these universities for their warm hospitality . | paper associate norm classical lorentz spaces used weighted reverse hardy inequality norm spaces @xmath0 @xmath1 measurable subset @xmath2 denote @xmath3 measurable functions @xmath4 @xmath1 @xmath5 @xmath7 weak @xmath8 space @xmath9 @xmath10 distribution function @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath16 decreasing rearrangement @xmath4 @xmath18 set extended valued @xmath19-measurable functions @xmath2 @xmath20 non - negative measurable functions @xmath21 @xmath22 non - decreasing functions @xmath23 recall definitions lorentz classical lorentz generalized lorentz spaces lorentz space @xmath24 @xmath13 collection measurable functions @xmath4 @xmath25 quantity @xmath26 finite @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 functional @xmath32 norm@xmath33 continuous embeddings @xmath34 function @xmath35 defined as @xmath36 @xmath37 functional @xmath38 by @xmath39 modification @xmath40 @xmath41 norm on @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath31 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 lorentz spaces see @xcite @xmath49 @xmath50 denote @xmath51 classical lorentz spaces measurable functions finite quasinorm @xmath52 statement @xmath53 valid spaces @xmath54 introduced lorentz 1951 @xcite spaces norms involve @xmath55 first time calderon s paper @xcite @xcite description dual @xmath56 lorentz @xcite @xmath57 @xmath58 norm @xmath59 nonincreasing class of weights @xmath58 equivalent to banach norm larger consists weights @xmath60 @xmath61 satisfy @xmath62 theorem 4 @xmath63 theorem 2.3 @xcite theorem 1.1 corollary 2.2 6 functional @xmath58 ; @xmath64 quasinorm quasinorm function @xmath65 satisfies @xmath66-condition@xmath67 @xcite conditions for @xmath56 linear space historical developments classical lorentz spaces see @xcite @xmath49 @xmath68 denote @xmath69 generalized lorentz spaces measurable functions finite quasinorm @xmath70 @xmath40 @xmath68 @xmath71 generalized classical lorentz spaces functions finite quasinorm @xmath72 statement @xmath73 @xmath74 valid space @xmath75 generalized lebesgue spaces definition of generalized marcinkiewicz space @xmath76 supremum taken for measurable subset of @xmath2 @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 classical lorentz space @xmath51 not linear generalized classical lorentz spaces @xmath71 not linear condition @xmath80 sufficient for classical lorentz spaces @xmath71 quasinorm space condition @xmath81 or @xmath82 for classical lorentz spaces @xmath71 norm space problems remark not easy classical lorentz spaces characterizations of embedding between generalized classical lorentz spaces boundedness of maximal operator solution find characterizations of associate spaces generalized classical lorentz spacespaper characterizations associate spaces special case @xmath83 generalized lorentz space @xmath69 introduced investigated @xcite @xmath84 set functions from @xmath85 homogenous functional @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 associate space @xmath90 @xmath84 set functions @xmath87 @xmath91 @xmath92 assume @xmath93 @xmath94 p. @xmath95 rearrangement - invariant function norm over resonant measure space @xmath96 associate norm @xmath97 rearrangement invariant @xmath98 holds write @xmath99 positive constant @xmath60 independent quantities satisfying @xmath100 write @xmath101 @xmath99 @xmath102 recall results @xcite @xmath103 @xmath59 denote weights locally integrable non - negative functions on @xmath21 set @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 denote @xmath107 @xmath108 @xmath109 omit subscript u @xmath110 @xmath87 conditions inequality @xmath111 established in @xcite @xmath112 continuous increasing function on @xmath113 @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath112 admissiblefunction @xmath116 @xmath112-quasiconcave if equivalent non - decreasing @xmath113 non - increasing @xmath21 @xmath112-quasiconcave function @xmath116 non - degenerate if @xmath118 non - denoted by @xmath119 @xmath103 weights @xmath120 by @xmath121 @xmath122 admissible function @xmath123 non - negative borel measure on @xmath113 function @xmath116 @xmath124 fundamental function of @xmath123 @xmath120 @xmath123 representation measure @xmath116 @xmath123 non - degenerate if conditions satisfied for @xmath106 @xmath125}{d\nu(s)\sigma(s=\infty\infty @xmath120 admissible function @xmath123 non - negative non - degenerate borel measure on @xmath113 @xmath116 fundamental function of @xmath123 @xmath120 @xmath126 @xmath127}d\nu(s)+\sigma(t)\infty @xmath128 @xmath129 be weights @xmath130 @xmath131 admissible@xmath120 non - degenerate @xmath131 @xmath123 representation measure @xmath132 @xmath133 if @xmath134 holds all @xmath4 if @xmath135 optimal constant @xmath60 satisfies @xmath136 if @xmath137 holds all @xmath4 if @xmath138 @xmath139 optimal constant satisfies @xmath140 associated spaces classical lorentz spaces @xmath141 calculated @xcite @xmath142 @xmath143 @xmath149 @xmath150 associate spaces @xmath0 described if @xmath144 @xmath151 @xmath123 representation measure @xmath152 @xmath153 if @xmath147 @xmath154 @xmath123 representation measure @xmath152 @xmath155 proposition @xmath156 take @xmath157 write @xmath158^{1/p} define function @xmath159 get @xmath160 @xmath161^{1/p }\left\sup\limits_}\frac{}f^{*}{1}^\limits_{r}\varphi(r^{p}_p^p_}{**}^{1/p}.\end{aligned} @xmath182 @xmath183 @xmath123 representation measure @xmath152 @xmath184 if @xmath185 @xmath186 @xmath123 representation @xmath152 @xmath187 observation function @xmath4 decreasing if @xmath188 decreasing @xmath189 embedding holds if following embedding holds @xmath190 required result using theorem [ abdfk ] paper written visit a. gogatishvili ankara university ahi - evran university kirsehir special gratitude universities warm hospitality | 0.426439 | 2,794 | 1,563 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,934 | we investigate the lyth relationship between the tensor - scalar ratio , @xmath0 , and the variation of the inflaton field , @xmath1 , over the course of inflation . for inflationary models that produce at least @xmath2 e - folds of inflation
, there is a correlation between @xmath0 and @xmath1 as anticipated by lyth , but the scatter around the relationship is huge .
however , for inflationary models that satisfy current observational constraints on the scalar spectral index and its first derivative , the lyth relationship is much tighter .
in particular , any inflationary model with @xmath3 must have @xmath4 .
large field variations are therefore required if a tensor mode signal is to be detected in any foreseeable cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) polarization experiment . | the inflationary paradigm , promoted by guth ( 1981 ) , linde ( 1982 ) and others , has achieved spectacular success in explaining the acoustic peak structure seen in the cmb ( see bennett 2003 and references therein ) .
nevertheless , very little is known about the mechanism of inflation and how it is related to fundamental physics .
the simplest mechanisms predict an adiabatic spectrum of nearly scale - invariant , gaussian , primordial fluctuations ( for reviews see linde 1990 , lyth and riotto 1999 , liddle and lyth 2000 ) .
however , as peiris ( 2003 , hereafter p03 ) and kinney ( 2004 ) demonstrate , a wide class of phenomenological inflationary models are compatible with the cmb and other cosmological data . given our ignorance of the underlying physics , it is worth asking what general statements can be made about inflation from particular types of observation .
for example , it is well known ( _ e.g. _ lyth 1984 ) that the amplitude of the tensor mode cmb anisotropy fixes the energy scale of slow - roll inflation @xmath5 where @xmath0 is the relative amplitude of the tensor and scalar modes defined as in p03 . , where @xmath6 and @xmath7 are the power spectra of the tensor and scalar curvature perturbations defined at a fiducial wavenumber of @xmath8 . ]
the present @xmath9 upper limit of @xmath10 ( seljak 2004 ) gives the constraint @xmath11 , or equivalently @xmath12 .
however , a successful model of inflation must also reproduce the observed amplitude of scalar perturbations and produce a sufficiently large number of e - foldings , @xmath13 , between the end of inflation and the time that these perturbations were generated . constraints on more general inflation models can be analysed using a set of ` inflationary flow ' equations ( hoffman and turner 2001 , kinney 2002 , easther and kinney 2003 , p03 , kinney 2004 ) describing the evolution of a hierarchy of ` slow - roll ' parameters .
the first two slow - roll parameters are defined in terms of the hubble parameter , @xmath14 , during inflation by @xmath15 where primes denote differentiation of @xmath16 with respect to the inflaton @xmath17 . in terms of @xmath18 ,
the derivatives of @xmath17 and @xmath14 with respect to the number of e - foldings to the end of inflation are given by @xmath19 @xmath20 and @xmath21 is a necessary criterion for inflation . to second order in slow - roll parameters , the tensor - scalar ratio @xmath0 is given by @xmath22 , \label{i5}\ ] ] where @xmath23 ( see liddle , parsons and barrow 1994 ) . lyth ( 1997 ) noted that for slow - roll inflation , equations ( [ i3 ] ) and ( [ i5 ] ) can be used to relate the change in the inflaton during inflation , @xmath1 , to the tensor - scalar ratio @xmath0 , since if @xmath18 is roughly constant @xmath24 since the universe inflates by @xmath25 during the period that wavelengths corresponding to the cmb multipoles @xmath26 cross the hubble radius , equation ( [ i6 ] ) leads to a bound between @xmath1 and @xmath0 , @xmath27 which we will refer to as the ` lyth bound . '
according to this bound , high values of @xmath0 require changes in @xmath1 of order @xmath28 .
in fact , equation ( [ i7 ] ) is a rather crude bound , since at least 50 - 60 e - foldings are required before inflation ends ( see _ e.g. _ liddle and leach 2003 ) . over the full course of inflation @xmath1 could therefore exceed ( [ i7 ] ) by an order of magnitude or more . in this paper
, we investigate the lyth bound , making as few assumptions as possible about the nature of inflation .
our aim is to establish whether a relation of the form ( [ i7 ] ) applies to general models of inflation that are compatible with observational constraints on the scalar fluctuation spectrum .
lyth ( 1997 ) , liddle and lyth ( 2000 ) , kinney ( 2003 ) and others argue that inflation can not be described by a low energy effective field theory if @xmath29 and so high values of @xmath30 are possible only in models for which no rigorous theoretical framework exists .
conversely , it has been argued that the lyth bound requires @xmath31 in models of inflation based on well - motivated particle physics . in section 3 , we will comment on these points and discuss the implications of the lyth bound for inflationary model building and for future cmb experiments designed to detect tensor modes .
as mentioned in the introduction , inflationary models can be described by an infinite hierarchy of slow roll parameters @xmath32 that satisfy a set of ` inflationary flow ' equations .
the inflationary flow approach has been used by a large number of authors and we refer the reader to p03 and kinney ( 2004 ) for a summary of the approach and for the complete set of flow equations . the models generated here followed the prescription given in kinney ( 2004 ) , except that the flow hierarchy was truncated at @xmath33 ( rather than @xmath34 ) and that successful inflationary models were required to expand by at least @xmath35 e - folds , consistent with the analysis of liddle and leach ( 2003 ) .
inflation was deemed to end if @xmath36 , in which case the models were evolved backwards by @xmath2 e - foldings to compute various observables , such as the tensor - scalar ratio @xmath0 , scalar spectral index @xmath37 , and the run in the spectral index @xmath38 ( using expressions accurate to second order in slow - roll parameters ) . for models in which inflation occurred at the minimum of a potential ( @xmath39 ) , inflation was simply abruptly terminated and observables calculated using the slow - roll parameters at the end of inflation .
physically , such cases can be considered as examples of hybrid inflation ( see liddle and lyth 2000 ) when inflation ends abruptly at some critical field value @xmath40 , or as examples of brane - inflation when inflation ends at a critical inter - brane separation at which open string modes become tachyonic ( see quevedo , 2002 , for a review ) . in practice , any models which achieved @xmath41 e - foldings were grouped into this category .
we evolved @xmath42 models using the above prescription .
figure 1 shows the parameters @xmath0 , @xmath37 and @xmath43 for a sample of these models plotted against each other .
the distributions in these diagrams agree well with the results of previous authors and are straightforward to understand physically .
more than 90% of the models are of the ` hybrid - type ' for which @xmath0 is negligible ( equation 4 ) and the scalar spectral index is @xmath44 ( since the inflaton is trapped in the minimum of a potential ) . of the remaining models , those colour coded in blue in figure 1 have @xmath10 and so are consistent with current constraints on the tensor - scalar ratio .
the middle panel of figure 1 shows that these models span a wide range of @xmath37 and @xmath45 .
3.5 truein figure 2 shows plots of @xmath46 over the final @xmath2 e - foldings of inflation computed from equation ( 3a ) plotted against the tensor - scalar ratio @xmath0 .
the figure to the left shows @xmath47 for all models within the designated ranges of the abscissa and ordinate , colour coded so that hybrid - type models are plotted in red , with the rest of the models plotted in blue .
this figure shows that for general inflationary models , there is no well defined lyth relation of the form ( [ i7 ] ) .
models can be found , for example , with @xmath48 and @xmath49 in the range @xmath50@xmath51 .
likewise , models can be found with low values of @xmath52 and @xmath53 well in excess of unity .
however , on closer inspection , one finds that models lying in these regions of the diagram have unusual scalar spectral indices . in the former case ,
the models have blue spectra with @xmath54 , and in the latter case the models have red spectra with @xmath55 .
it is therefore interesting to plot @xmath0 against @xmath1 only for those models that satisfy observation constraints on the shape of the scalar power spectrum .
the tightest observational constraints on @xmath37 and @xmath56 at present come from combining observations of the cmb anisotropies , with observations of the matter power spectrum deduced from galaxy redshift surveys and from ly@xmath57 lines in the spectra of high redshift quasars ( see _ e.g. _ viel 2004 , seljak 2004 ) .
the recent results of seljak give approximate @xmath58 ranges of @xmath59 ( see figure 3 of seljak 2004 ) .
figure 2b shows @xmath0 and @xmath1 for the subset of models that satisfy the constraints given in ( 8) .
( in fact , although we have imposed a constraint on @xmath60 , it is the constraint on @xmath37 that has the most significant effect in defining the distribution of points in figure 2b . )
the models plotted in figure 2b now delineate a much tighter relationship between @xmath0 and @xmath1 , which can be approximated for @xmath3 by @xmath61 this relation is our reformulation of the lyth bound ( 6 ) . 3.5 truein
present observations set the constraint @xmath10 ( seljak 2004 ) . to improve on this limit
significantly will require more sensitive cmb polarization experiments than those done so far .
the _ planck _
satellite should be able to achieve a limit of @xmath62 by measuring the b - mode polarization spectrum , but despite the fact that _ planck _ will survey the entire sky from space it is limited in sensitivity by the small number of polarization sensitive detectors .
ground based b - mode optimised experiments , using either bolometer arrays ( clover , taylor 2004 ) , or large arrays of coherent detectors ( quieti.htm ] ) are currently being designed that should be able to set limits of @xmath63 in the presence of realistic foregrounds .
for @xmath64 , b - mode anisotropies caused by gravitational lensing of the cmb ( zaldarriaga and seljak 1998 ) will need to be subtracted in order to extract an inflationary tensor component . however , there are limits on how accurately a lensing contribution can be subtracted .
for example , even in the absence of instrumental noise and foregrounds , lewis ( 2002 ) find that a survey of the sky of radius @xmath65 leads to a limit of @xmath66 from the sample variance of the lens - induced b - modes .
this limit could potentially be improved by a factor of @xmath67 with a noiseless all sky survey ( kesden 2002 , knox and song 2002 ) , and perhaps by another factor of @xmath67 if the lens - induced b - modes can be mapped accurately enough to reconstruct the deflection field ( hirata and seljak 2003 ) .
comparing with equation ( 1 ) , under optimistic assumptions the lowest energy scale of inflation that can be probed by cmb b - mode polarization measurements is @xmath68 .
more realistically , the next generation of cmb experiments such as clover and quiet may reach @xmath63 , corresponding to an energy scale of @xmath69 . figure 2b shows that to produce a detectable tensor component in any foreseeable cmb experiment , inflation must necessarily involve large field variations , @xmath70 .
in fact , the dependence of @xmath1 on @xmath0 in figure 2b is so steep that we would need to achieve @xmath71 to probe inflationary models with low field variations of @xmath72 .
thus , for the foreseeable future , we will only be able to test high - field models of inflation .
furthermore , it may well prove impossible , given realistic polarized foregrounds , to probe small - field models of inflation using the cmb .
it is often argued ( _ e.g. _ lyth 1997 ) that the effective potential can be written as a power series @xmath73 with @xmath74 , and hence that an effective field theory description of inflation becomes invalid for field values @xmath75 .
however , as linde ( 2004 ) points out , quantum gravity corrections to @xmath76 should become large only for @xmath77 , not @xmath78 as inferred from equation ( [ c1 ] ) .
this is the rationale behind chaotic inflation models such as the simple @xmath79 model ( which is now excluded observationally at about the @xmath80 level ) .
however , it has proved difficult to find realisations of chaotic inflation motivated by realistic particle physics .
for example , realising the conditions for slow - roll inflation for either large or small field variations has been a long standing problem in @xmath81 supergravity .
this may , however , simply reflect our lack of understanding of supergravity .
for example , it has been pointed out recently that chaotic inflation can be realised in supergravity models if the potential has a shift symmetry ( kawasaki 2000 , yamaguchi and yokoyama 2001 ) , _ i.e. _ the inflaton potential does not depend on the imaginary part of a complex field @xmath82 ( see linde 2004 for a more detailed discussion ) .
it may therefore be possible to construct particle physics motivated models of inflation with @xmath83 .
understanding the physics behind such high - field models is important , for as we have shown in this paper they are the only class of inflationary models that can be probed by cmb b - mode polarization experiments in the foreseeable future . _ acknowledgments : _ the research of gpe is supported by the uk particle and astrophysics research council .
km would like to thank the institute of astronomy for their hospitality during a summer visit when part of this work was done .
bennett c.l . , , 2003 , _
ap j. suppl
_ , * 148 * , 1 . | inflationary paradigm promoted by guth 1981 linde 1982 success acoustic peak structure in cmb bennett 2003 little known about mechanism inflation physics simplest mechanisms predict adiabatic spectrum of scale - invariant gaussian primordial fluctuations see linde 1990 lyth riotto 1999 liddle lyth 2000 peiris 2003 kinney 2004 ) demonstrate phenomenological inflationary models compatible with cmb cosmological data ignorance of physics asking general statements about inflation from observation 1984 amplitude of tensor mode cmb anisotropy fixes energy scale of slow - roll inflation @xmath0 relative amplitude of tensor scalar modes @xmath6 @xmath7 power spectra of tensor scalar curvature perturbations wavenumber @xmath9 upper limit of @xmath10 seljak 2004 @xmath11 @xmath12 successful model inflation must reproduce observed amplitude of scalar perturbations produce large number of e - foldings @xmath13 between end inflation perturbations generatedinflation models analysed using inflationary flow equations ( hoffman turner 2001 kinney 2002 easther kinney 2003 2004 evolution slow - roll parameters first two parameters defined hubble parameter @xmath14 during inflation by @xmath15 primes differentiation of @xmath16 @xmath17 derivatives of @xmath17 e - inflation given by @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 necessary criterion inflation tensor - scalar ratio @xmath0 given by @xmath22 @xmath23 1994 lyth 1997 slow - roll inflation equations ( [ i3 i5 ] ) relate change in inflaton during inflation @xmath1 to tensor - scalar ratio @xmath0 @xmath18 constant @xmath24 inflates by @xmath25 wavelengths multipoles @xmath26 cross hubble radius equation ( i6 ] ) leads to bound between @xmath1 @xmath27 lyth bound high values of @xmath0 require changes in @xmath1 @xmath28 equation ( i7 ] ) bound 50 - 60 e - foldings required before inflation endsliddle leach 2003 inflation @xmath1 could exceed [ i7 ] ) investigate lyth bound few assumptions inflation aim establish relation form [ i7 ] ) applies to models inflation observational constraints scalar fluctuation spectrum lyth 1997 liddle lyth 2000 kinney 2003 ) others argue inflation low energy field theory if @xmath29 high values @xmath30 possible in models no rigorous theoretical framework lyth bound requires @xmath31 in models inflation well - motivated particle physics section 3 comment discuss implications lyth bound for inflationary model building future cmb experiments tensor modes inflationary models described infinite hierarchy slow roll parameters @xmath32 inflationary flow equations inflationary flow approach used by authors refer to p03 kinney ( 2004 ) for summary complete flow equations models followed prescription kinney 2004 ) flow hierarchy truncated at @xmath33 successful inflationary models expand by @xmath35 e - folds consistent with analysis liddle leach 2003 )inflation if @xmath36 models evolved backwards by @xmath2 e - foldings compute observables tensor - scalar ratio @xmath0 scalar spectral index @xmath37 run spectral index @xmath38 expressions second order slow - roll parameters models inflation at minimum potential ( @xmath39 ) inflation abruptly terminated observables calculated using slow - roll parameters end hybrid inflation ends at critical field value @xmath40 brane - inflation ends at critical inter - brane separation open string modes tachyonic quevedo 2002 models @xmath41 e - grouped category evolved @xmath42 models using prescription figure 1 shows parameters @xmath0 @xmath37 @xmath43 for models distributions agree with results previous authors straightforward understand 90% models hybrid - type ' @xmath0 negligible equation 4 scalar spectral index @xmath44 trapped in minimum potential remaining models colour coded in blue have @xmath10 consistent with current constraints on tensor - scalar ratio models span range of @xmath37 and @xmath45figure 2 shows plots @xmath46 over final @xmath2 e - inflation equation ( 3a ) against tensor - scalar ratio @xmath0 figure left shows @xmath47 for models within ranges abscissa ordinate hybrid - type models plotted in red rest blue general inflationary models no defined lyth relation form ( models with @xmath48 @xmath49 in range @xmath50@xmath51 models with low values @xmath52 @xmath53 excess unity models regions have unusual scalar spectral indices blue spectra with @xmath54 red spectra with @xmath55 to plot @xmath0 against @xmath1 for models observation constraints scalar power spectrum tightest observational constraints on @xmath37 and @xmath56 from combining observations cmb anisotropies observations matter power spectrum galaxy redshift surveys ly@xmath57 lines spectra high redshift quasars recent results seljak give approximate @xmath58 ranges of @xmath59 figure 3 figure 2b shows @xmath0 and @xmath1 for models constraintsimposed constraint on @xmath60 constraint @xmath37 significant effect distribution of points in figure 2b models in figure 2b delineate tighter relationship between @xmath0 and @xmath1 approximated for @xmath3 by @xmath61 relation reformulation of lyth bound ( 6 ) observations set constraint @xmath10 ( 2004 ) improve limit more sensitive cmb polarization experiments _ planck _ satellite should achieve limit of @xmath62 b - mode polarization spectrum sky limited by small number polarization sensitive detectors ground based b - mode experiments using bolometer arrays or large arrays of coherent detectors designed set limits of @xmath63 realistic foregrounds for @xmath64 b - mode anisotropies by gravitational lensing cmb need subtracted to extract inflationary tensor component limits on lensing contribution subtracted survey of sky of radius @xmath65 leads to limit of @xmath66 from sample variance lens - induced b - modeslimit improved by factor @xmath67 with noiseless sky survey kesden 2002 knox song 2002 another factor @xmath67 if lens - induced b - modes mapped deflection field hirata seljak 2003 ) equation assumptions lowest energy scale inflation probed by cmb b - mode polarization measurements is @xmath68 next generation cmb experiments clover reach @xmath63 energy scale @xmath69 figure 2b detectable tensor component inflation involve large field variations , @xmath70 dependence of @xmath1 on @xmath0 steep achieve @xmath71 probe models low field variations @xmath72 only test high - field models inflation impossible to probe small - field models inflation using cmb effective potential written as power series @xmath73 with @xmath74 field theory description inflation invalid for field values @xmath75 linde 2004 quantum gravity corrections to @xmath76 large for @xmath77 not @xmath78 rationale behind chaotic inflation models simple @xmath79 model excluded observationally at @xmath80 leveldifficult to find chaotic inflation motivated by particle physics realising conditions for slow - roll inflation for large or small field variations problem in @xmath81 supergravity may reflect lack of understanding supergravity chaotic inflation realised in supergravity models if potential shift symmetry ( kawasaki 2000 yokoyama 2001 potential depend on imaginary complex field @xmath82 see linde 2004 possible to construct particle physics motivated models inflation with @xmath83 understanding physics behind high - field models important only class inflationary models probed by cmb b - mode polarization experiments research gpe supported by uk particle and astrophysics research council institute of astronomy for hospitality during summer visit bennett c.l . 2003 j. suppl 148 | 0.507215 | 3,172 | 1,664 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,935 | i discuss single top quark production at the tevatron and the lhc .
the cross section , including soft - gluon threshold corrections through nnnlo , is presented for each partonic channel .
the higher - order corrections provide significant contributions to the single top cross sections at both colliders . * higher - order threshold corrections for single top quark production * nikolaos kidonakis + + | single top quark production at hadron colliders can proceed through three distinct partonic processes : the @xmath0 channel ( @xmath1 and @xmath2 ) which involves the exchange of a spacelike @xmath3 boson , the @xmath4 channel ( @xmath5 ) which proceeds via a timelike @xmath3 boson , and associated @xmath6 production ( @xmath7 ) @xcite .
the @xmath0 channel processes are numerically the largest at both the tevatron and the lhc . at the tevatron
the @xmath4 channel is second in magnitude and @xmath6 production has the smallest cross section . at the lhc ,
@xmath6 production has a much bigger cross section than the @xmath4 channel .
the cross sections for all these processes receive contributions from soft - gluon emission which can be dominant near threshold @xcite .
threshold resummation organizes these contributions and can be used to compute higher - order corrections for many processes @xcite . for the partonic process with momenta @xmath8
we define @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 and @xmath12 . near threshold ,
@xmath13 approaches zero and the soft - gluon corrections take the form @xmath14_+$ ] , where @xmath15 is the top quark mass and @xmath16 for the @xmath17-th order corrections .
we calculate these corrections through next - to - next - to - next - to - leading order ( nnnlo ) in the strong coupling @xmath18 at next - to - leading logarithmic ( nll ) accuracy at the tevatron @xcite and the lhc @xcite .
this requires one - loop calculations in the eikonal approximation .
the nlo soft - gluon corrections can be written in the form @xmath19_+ + c_{2 } \left[\frac{1}{s_4}\right]_+ + c_{1}^{\mu } \ , \delta(s_4)\right\ } \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath20 is the born term for each channel and @xmath21 is the renormalization scale . for the @xmath0 and @xmath4 channels the leading logarithm coefficient is @xmath22 while for the @xmath6 channel it is @xmath23 , where @xmath24 and @xmath25 with @xmath26 the number of colors .
the nll coefficient is @xmath27 for the @xmath4 channel , where @xmath28 is the factorization scale , and similar expressions can be given for the other channels .
the complete virtual corrections ( @xmath29 terms ) can not be derived from threshold resummation but one can derive the factorization and renormalization scale terms denoted by @xmath30 in the above equation @xcite .
the nnlo soft - gluon corrections for the @xmath0 and @xmath4 channels are @xmath31_+ \right .
\nonumber \\ & & \hspace{20 mm } \left . { } + \left[\frac{3}{2 } c_3 \ , c_2 -\frac{\beta_0}{4 } c_3 + c_f \frac{\beta_0}{8}\right ] \left[\frac{\ln^2(s_4/m_t^2)}{s_4}\right]_+ \right\ } \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] plus subleading terms @xcite , where the appropriate expression for @xmath32 and @xmath33 , @xmath34 for each channel must be used , and where @xmath35 is the lowest - order @xmath36 function , with @xmath37 the number of light quark flavors .
a similar expression holds for the @xmath6 channel ( by deleting @xmath38 above ) .
since this is a nll calculation , only the leading and nll terms shown above are complete .
however we can also calculate exactly terms involving @xmath28 and @xmath21 as well as terms with @xmath39 constants in the subleading logarithms .
complete expressions and further details are provided in ref .
@xcite .
the nnnlo soft - gluon corrections for each channel can be written as @xmath40_+ \right .
\nonumber \\ & & \hspace{20 mm } \left . { } + \left[\frac{5}{8 } c_3 ^ 2 c_2 -\frac{5}{48 } \beta_0 c_3 ( 2 c_3-c_f ) \right ] \left[\frac{\ln^4(s_4/m_t^2)}{s_4}\right]_+ \right\ } \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] plus subleading terms @xcite , again with the appropriate expression for @xmath32 and @xmath33 , @xmath34 .
-channel single top quark cross section at the tevatron.,title="fig:",width=249 ] -channel single top quark cross section at the tevatron.,title="fig:",width=249 ] [ fig : t - chan.tev ] we now calculate the contribution of these corrections to the single top cross section at the fermilab tevatron .
the mrst 2004 nnlo parton densities @xcite are used for the numerical results .
we find that the threshold corrections are dominant in all partonic channels .
figure 1 shows the results for the cross section in the @xmath0 channel . in the left - hand plot
we show the leading - order ( lo ) cross section as well as the cross sections with the nlo , nnlo , and nnnlo soft - gluon corrections included versus the top quark mass @xmath15 , with the factorization and renormalization scales set equal to @xmath15 . on the right - hand plot
we show the @xmath41 factors , which are the ratios of the higher - order cross sections to lo .
we see that the corrections in this channel are relatively small .
our best estimate for the cross section is calculated after matching to the exact nlo cross section @xcite , i.e. by adding the soft - gluon corrections through nnnlo to the exact nlo cross section .
below we give results for two choices of the top quark mass , @xmath42 gev and @xmath43 gev .
we find @xmath44 pb and @xmath45 pb . the uncertainty indicated includes the scale dependence and the pdf uncertainties .
figure 2 shows the results for the cross section and @xmath41 factors in the @xmath4 channel . in this channel
the corrections are large , providing up to 65% enhancement of the leading - order cross section . after matching , we find @xmath46 pb and @xmath47 pb . the single top cross section at the tevatron in the @xmath6 channel is rather small , even though the @xmath41 factors are large ( up to 85% enhancement ) .
our estimate for the cross section is @xmath48 pb and @xmath49 pb . for all three channels at the tevatron the cross section for single anti - top production is identical to that shown above for single top production .
-channel single top quark cross section at the tevatron.,title="fig:",width=249 ] -channel single top quark cross section at the tevatron.,title="fig:",width=249 ] [ fig : s - chan.tev ] finally , we note that there has been recent evidence for single top quark production at the tevatron @xcite with a cross section consistent with the above results .
next we calculate the threshold corrections for the single top cross section at the cern lhc .
it turns out that in the @xmath0 channel the threshold corrections are not a good approximation of full qcd corrections , hence we only update the exact nlo result @xcite , while in the @xmath4 and @xmath6 channels the threshold approximation holds and we provide results including the nnnlo soft - gluon corrections .
also at the lhc the cross section for single top is different from that for single antitop production in the @xmath0 and @xmath4 channels .
the exact nlo cross section for single top production in the @xmath0 channel at the lhc is @xmath50 pb and @xmath51 pb . for single antitop production in the @xmath0 channel the exact nlo cross section is @xmath52 pb and @xmath53 pb . figure 3 ( left ) shows results for single top production in the @xmath4 channel at the lhc .
the contribution from soft gluons is significant ( up to 55% enhancement ) . after matching to the exact nlo cross section @xcite
, we find @xmath54 pb and @xmath55 pb . the corresponding results for single antitop production at the lhc in the @xmath4 channel are @xmath56 pb and @xmath57 pb . here the soft - gluon corrections are somewhat smaller ( less than 20% ) . figure 3 ( right ) shows results for single top production at the lhc in the @xmath6 channel .
this channel has a significant cross section at the lhc .
also the soft - gluon corrections are quite large , providing around 60% enhancement . after matching to the exact nlo cross section @xcite
, we find @xmath58 pb and @xmath59 pb . the cross section for associated antitop production is identical to that for a top quark .
-channel single top ( left ) and @xmath6 ( right ) cross sections at the lhc.,title="fig:",width=249 ] -channel single top ( left ) and @xmath6 ( right ) cross sections at the lhc.,title="fig:",width=249 ] [ fig : s - chan.tw.lhc ]
this work has been supported by the national science foundation under grant no .
phy 0555372 . n. kidonakis and a. belyaev ,
jhep * 12 * , 004 ( 2003 ) [ hep - ph/0310299 ] ; n. kidonakis and a. sabio vera , jhep * 02 * , 027 ( 2004 ) [ hep - ph/0311266 ] ; r.j .
gonsalves , n. kidonakis and a. sabio vera , phys .
lett . * 95 * , 222001 ( 2005 ) [ hep - ph/0507317 ] ; n. kidonakis , r.j
. gonsalves , and a. sabio vera , in dis 2006 , p. 337
( 2007 ) [ hep - ph/0606145 ] . | quark production at hadron colliders through three partonic processes @xmath0 channel spacelike boson @xmath4 channel timelike boson @xmath6 production @xcite @xmath0 channel processes largest at tevatron lhc tevatron @xmath4 channel second magnitude @xmath6 production smallest cross section lhc @xmath6 bigger cross section cross sections soft - gluon emission dominant near threshold @xcite threshold resummation organizes contributions higher - order corrections for processes partonic process momenta @xmath8 @xmath9 near threshold @xmath13 approaches zero soft - gluon corrections form @xmath14_+$ ] @xmath15 top quark mass @xmath16 @xmath17-th order corrections calculate corrections next leading order strong coupling @xmath18 next - - leading logarithmic accuracy at tevatron @xcite lhc @xcite requires one - loop calculations eikonal approximationnlo soft - gluon corrections @xmath19_+ c_{2{1}_4 c_{1}\delta(s_4){aligned @xmath20 born term @xmath21 renormalization scale @xmath0 @xmath4 channels leading logarithm coefficient @xmath22 @xmath6 channel @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 number colors nll coefficient @xmath27 @xmath4 channel @xmath28 factorization scale similar expressions other channels complete virtual corrections @xmath29 terms derived threshold resummation derive factorization renormalization scale terms denoted @xmath30 nnlo soft - gluon corrections @xmath0 @xmath4 channels @xmath31_+{20 mm\left[\frac{3}{2 c_3 -_0}{4 c_f {\beta_0}{8}\left\frac{\ln^2(s_4/m_t^2)}{s_4}\right\nonumber{aligned subleading terms @xcite expression @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 channel @xmath35 lowest - order @xmath36 function @xmath37 light quark flavors similar expression @xmath6 channel deleting @xmath38 nll calculation leading nll terms complete calculate terms @xmath28 @xmath21 @xmath39 constants subleading logarithms complete expressions details @xcite soft - gluon corrections channel @xmath40_+ \nonumber{20 mm[\frac{5}{8 } c_3_2 -\frac{5}{48 } \beta_0 c_3 c_3-c_f ) \frac{\ln^4(s_4/m_t^2)}{s_4}\right{aligned subleading terms @xcite appropriate expression @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 -channel single top quark cross section tevatron.-channel single top quark cross section tevatron contribution corrections single top cross section fermilab tevatron mrst 2004 nnlo parton densities @xcite results threshold corrections dominant partonic channels figure 1 results cross section @xmath0 channel left plot leading - order cross section cross sections nlo soft - gluon corrections versus top quark mass @xmath15 factorization renormalization scales equal @xmath15 right plot @xmath41 factors ratios higher - order cross sections to lo corrections small best estimate cross section after matching exact nlo cross section adding soft - gluon corrections results two top quark mass @xmath42 @xmath43 gev @xmath44 pb @xmath45 pb uncertainty includes scale dependence pdf uncertainties figure 2 results cross section @xmath41 factors @xmath4 channel corrections large to 65% enhancement leading - order cross section after matching @xmath46 pb @xmath47 pb single top cross section tevatron @xmath6 channel small @xmath41 factors large up to 85% enhancement estimate cross section @xmath48 pb and @xmath49 pbthree channels tevatron cross section single anti - top production identical to single top production -channel single top quark cross section recent evidence for single top quark production tevatron @xcite cross section consistent calculate threshold corrections single top cross section cern lhc @xmath0 channel threshold corrections not full qcd corrections update exact nlo result @xcite @xmath4 @xmath6 channels threshold approximation holds provide results including soft - gluon corrections lhc cross section single top different single antitop @xmath0 @xmath4 channels exact nlo cross section single top production @xmath50 pb @xmath51 pb single antitop @xmath0 @xmath52 pb @xmath53 pb figure 3 results single top production @xmath4 channel contribution soft gluons significant up to 55% enhancement matching exact nlo cross section @xcite @xmath54 pb @xmath55 pb results single antitop @xmath4 channel @xmath56 pb @xmath57 pb soft - gluon corrections smaller less than 20% figure 3 results single top production lhc @xmath6 channelchannel significant cross section lhc soft - gluon corrections large 60% enhancement matching nlo cross section @xcite @xmath58 pb @xmath59 pb cross section antitop production identical top quark -channel single top left @xmath6 right cross sections lhc top @xmath6 right cross sections lhc work supported national science foundation grant 0555372 n. kidonakis a. belyaev jhep 12 004 2003 ) - ph/0310299 kidonakis a. sabio vera jhep 02 027 2004 ) ph/0311266 r gonsalves n. kidonakis a. sabio vera phys lett 95 222001 2005 ) hep - ph/0507317 sabio vera dis 2006 p. 337 2007 hep - ph/0606145 | 0.352506 | 2,385 | 1,258 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,946 | abstract .
if no light higgs boson exist , the interaction among the gauge bosons becomes strong at high energies ( @xmath0 1tev ) .
the effects of strong electroweak symmetry breaking ( sewsb ) could manifest themselves as anomalous couplings before they give rise to new physical states , thus measurement of all couplings and their possible deviation from standard model ( sm ) values could give valuable information for understanding the true nature of symmetry breaking sector . here
we present a detail study of the measurement of quartic gauge couplings in weak boson scattering processes and a possibility for same measurement in triple weak boson production .
expected limits on the parameters @xmath1 and @xmath2 in electroweak chiral lagrangian are given . | .sensitivity to quartic anomalous couplings for all possible scattering processes [ cols="<,<,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ krk - t4 ] table [ trtmrt ] and table [ krk - t4 ] contain results for weak boson scattering assuming integrated luminosity of 1000fb@xmath3 in @xmath4 mode in su(2)@xmath5 conserving case and broken su(2)@xmath5 .
we consider now the reactions @xmath6 and @xmath7 . on tree level the elementary process producing the @xmath8 final state
is driven by 15 feynman diagrams .
only one of the diagrams contains the quartic coupling and has to be extracted from the other interfering terms . only the part containing a longitudinal gauge boson
is expected to give a sizable signal related to electroweak symmetry breaking . for @xmath8
this part is substantially enhanced using polarized beams .
we investigate several cases : i ) unpolarized , ii ) @xmath9 right polarized electrons , and iii ) @xmath9 right polarized electrons along with @xmath10 left polarized positrons . for @xmath11 polarization
is not substantial , since the standard model background is much smaller ( two diagrams ) .
calculations are done using the whizard event generator @xcite . since the gauge bosons are short lived states they decay .
presently we consider on - shell gauge bosons only ( narrow width approximation ) and hadronize the final state using pythia @xcite.the three - boson state is characterized by three four - momenta and the bosonic spins . in general three momenta lead to 12 kinematical variables that are reduced by four through energy momentum conservation , by three because of the on - shell condition mentioned before , and by two due to rotational invariance .
hence in total three independent kinematical variables are left .
we choose two invariant masses of the dalitz plot , @xmath12 , @xmath13 and the angle @xmath14 between the beam axis and the direction of the @xmath15-boson .
spin of the bosons leads to additional degrees of freedom , and we may distinguish longitudinal ( @xmath16 ) from transverse ( @xmath17 ) polarization . presently , we do not yet analyze the bosonic spins .
the three independent kinematical variables lead to a three dimensional histogram . if the angle @xmath14 is not measured the resulting two dimensional histogram leads a dalitz plot .
we investigate the differences on the histograms as a function of @xmath18 and @xmath19 .
the observable are discretize into bins and @xmath20 is given by @xmath21 where @xmath22 denotes the error , and @xmath23 the sums over bins of @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and @xmath14 .
we use the whizard generator to produce standard model events corresponding to a luminosity of 1000 fb@xmath24 .
the detector efficiency is simulated using the fast simulation simdet @xcite . to reconstruct @xmath8
, we use the decay @xmath25 jets .
the dominant background is due to @xmath26 jets . in the absence of a full simulation at 1000 gev we estimate from our previous studies at 500 gev @xcite a combined effect of efficiency and purity to be 42% .
a full simulation at 1000 gev is presently under development .
the probabilities of standard model events are reweighted when introducing anomalous couplings @xmath18 , @xmath19 .
since the effective lagrangian is linear in @xmath18 , @xmath19 any observable is of second order in the parameters and can be expressed by a polynomial with five parameters .
the parameters are determined by evaluation of @xmath27 for each event and for five pairs of fixed values @xmath28 . by inversion
@xmath29 is know for arbitrary values of @xmath28 , viz .
@xmath30 for each bin @xmath23 .
finally we calculate @xmath20 and determine @xmath31 and @xmath32 for the specific values @xmath33
( 68.3% confidence ) and @xmath34 ( 90% confidence ) .
results are shown in fig .
[ fig : result ] .
we find that the sensitivity drastically increases with polarization .
sensitivity can be improved even further by utilizing meaningful cuts , which has not been done in the present stage of analysis and by using the information of angular distribution of the jets that depends on the polarization stage of the final bosons .
expected limits on the measurement of anomalous quartic couplings from all possible weak boson scattering processes were presented . in fig .
[ fig : upsala ] we make a comparison of estimated sensitivites from weak boson scattering processes and ongoing triple boson production analysis . with
the same integrated luminosity and @xmath9 left @xmath35 and @xmath36 right @xmath37 polarization for scattering and @xmath9 right @xmath37 and @xmath10 left @xmath35 polarization for triple producstion we obtain comparable results .
this shows that luminosity sharing of opposite polarization can probably lead to the same overall accuracy for the measurement of quartic boson couplings .
the same luminosity based conclusion was made after comparison of @xmath38 and @xmath39 running modes leaving the experimental physicist several ways to achieve the desired precision . | to quartic couplings scattering processes cols=" krk - t4 table - results weak boson scattering luminosity 1000fb@xmath3 @xmath4 mode su(2)@xmath5 case broken su(2)@xmath5 reactions @xmath6 @xmath7 tree level process @xmath8 final state driven by 15 feynman diagrams one contains quartic coupling extracted part longitudinal gauge boson signal electroweak symmetry breaking @xmath8 enhanced using polarized beams investigate cases unpolarized right polarized right polarized electrons @xmath10 left polarized positrons @xmath11 polarization not substantial standard model background smaller calculations whizard event generator @xcite gauge bosons decay consider on - shell gauge bosons hadronize final state using pythia @xcite three - boson state three four - momenta bosonic spins three momenta lead to 12 kinematical variables reduced by four energy momentum conservation on - shell condition two rotational invariance three independent kinematical variables leftchoose two invariant masses dalitz plot angle between beam axis direction @xmath15-boson spin bosons leads freedom distinguish longitudinal transverse polarization analyze bosonic spins three kinematical variables lead three dimensional histogram angle @xmath14 not measured two dimensional histogram leads dalitz plot investigate differences histograms @xmath18 @xmath19 observable discretize into bins @xmath20 given @xmath21 @xmath22 error @xmath23 sums over bins use whizard generator standard model events luminosity 1000 fb@xmath24 detector efficiency simulated fast simulation @xcite reconstruct @xmath8 use decay @xmath25 jets dominant background due @xmath26 jets full simulation 1000 gev estimate studies combined effect efficiency purity 42% full simulation 1000 gev under development probabilities standard model events reweighted introducing anomalous couplings @xmath18 @xmath19 effective lagrangian linear @xmath18 observable second order parameters expressed polynomial five parameters parameters determined evaluation @xmath27 each event five pairs fixed values @xmath28inversion @xmath29 for arbitrary values @xmath28 @xmath30 each bin @xmath23 calculate @xmath20 determine @xmath31 @xmath32 for specific values @xmath33 ( 68.3% confidence @xmath34 ( 90% confidence ) results fig . sensitivity increases with polarization sensitivity utilizing meaningful cuts not present stage using information angular distribution jets polarization stage final bosons expected limits measurement anomalous quartic couplings weak boson scattering processes presented fig . comparison estimated sensitivites weak boson scattering processes triple boson production analysis integrated luminosity @xmath9 polarization for scattering triple producstion comparable results luminosity sharing opposite polarization same accuracy measurement quartic boson couplings luminosity conclusion comparison @xmath38 @xmath39 running modes experimental physicist achieve desired precision | 0.184254 | 1,181 | 597 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,956 | the angular and frequency characteristics of the gravitational radiation emitted in collisions of massless particles is studied perturbatively in the context of classical general relativity for small values of the ratio @xmath0 of the schwarzschild radius over the impact parameter .
the particles are described with their trajectories , while the contribution of the leading nonlinear terms of the gravitational action is also taken into account .
the old quantum results are reproduced in the zero frequency limit .
the radiation efficiency @xmath1 _ outside _ a narrow cone of angle @xmath2 in the forward and backward directions with respect to the initial particle trajectories is given by and is dominated by radiation with characteristic frequency .
the comparison with previous works and the known literature is presented . | the problem of gravitational radiation in particle collisions has a long history and has been studied in a variety of approaches and approximations .
the problem of gravitational radiation in _
massless-_particle collisions is worth studying in its own right and has attracted the interest of many authors in the past as well as very recently .
apart from its obvious relevance in the context of tev - scale gravity models with large extra dimensions @xcite , it is very important in relation to the structure of string theory and the issue of black - hole formation in ultra - planckian collisions @xcite .
nevertheless , to the best of our knowledge , complete understanding of all facets of the problem is still lacking .
the emission of radiation in the form of _ soft _ gravitons was computed in@xcite in the context of quantum field theory , but in that computation the contribution of the non - linear graviton self - couplings i.e. the stress part of the energy - momentum tensor , was argued to be negligible .
the result of the quantum computation for low - frequency graviton emission was reproduced by a purely classical computation in@xcite .
more recently , a new approach was put forward for the computation of the characteristics of the emitted radiation @xcite , based on the fraunhofer approximation of radiation theory .
the purpose here is to extend the method used in@xcite to the study of gravitational radiation in collisions of massless particles with center - of - mass energy @xmath3 and impact parameter @xmath4 .
the formal limit @xmath5 ( or equivalently @xmath6 for the lorentz factor ) of the massive case leads to nonsensical answers for the radiation efficiency , i.e. the ratio @xmath7 of the radiated to the available energy , the characteristic radiation frequency @xmath8 , or the characteristic emission angle @xmath9 .
we study classically the gravitational radiation in the collision of massless particles using the same perturbative approach as in @xcite .
this presentation is mainly based on results obtained in@xcite .
the action describing the two massless particles and their gravitational interaction reads @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the einbein of the trajectory @xmath12 in terms of the corresponding affine parameter @xmath13 , @xmath14 and the summation is over the two particles .
we will be using unprimed and primed symbols to denote quantities related to the two particles .
for identical colliding particles in the center - of - mass frame @xmath15 with @xmath16 the energy of each colliding particle .
thus , the particles move on null geodesics , while variation of @xmath17 leads to the particle equation of motion : @xmath18 and similarly for @xmath19 .
the particle energy - momentum is defined by @xmath20 . at zeroth order in the gravitational interaction , the space - time is flat and the particles move on straight lines with constant velocities , i.e. @xmath21 given that @xmath22 is traceless , the perturbation @xmath23 satisfies for each particle separately the equation @xmath24 whose solution in coordinate representation is the aichelburg
sexl metric @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the @xmath27dimensional fourier transform of @xmath28 : @xmath29 with @xmath30 an arbitrary constant length parameter .
write for the metric @xmath31 and substitute in ( [ peom ] ) to obtain for the first correction of the trajectory of the unprimed particle the equation @xmath32 the interaction with the self - field of the particle has been omitted and @xmath33 due to the primed particle is evaluated at the location of the unprimed particle on its unperturbed trajectory .
integrating ( [ peom1 ] ) one obtains the trajectory in components : @xmath34 which vanish for all .
indeed , the massless particle trajectories should remain undisturbed before the collision .
thus , we reproduce the leading order expressions of the two well - known facts @xcite about the geodesics in an aichelburg - sexl metric , namely : ( i ) the _ time delay _ at the moment of shock equal to @xmath35 ( ii ) the _ refraction _ caused by the gravitational interaction by an angle @xmath36 in the direction of the center of gravity .
the gravitational wave source has two parts .
one is the particle energy - momentum contribution , localized on the accelerated particle trajectories . the direct particle contribution to the source of radiation
is called local " , because it is localized on the particle trajectories .
the first order term in the expansion of @xmath37 is @xmath38 \delta^4 \!\!{\kern 1pt}\left(x-\ ! \ ! { \ , ^0\!}z(\sigma ) \right)\ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath39 is evaluated at @xmath40 and @xmath41 is evaluated at @xmath42 . in fourier
space one obtains effectively @xmath43\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the contribution to the source at second - order coming from the expansion of the einstein tensor , reads @xcite @xmath44 upon substitution of @xmath23 and @xmath45 of the previous section in the above expression we obtain for the fourier transform of @xmath46 @xmath47 \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] in terms of the integrals ( @xmath48 ) @xmath49 * total radiation amplitudes . * defining in the center - of - mass frame the radiation wave - vector by @xmath50 and contracting with the two polarizations ( defined as usual ) , we obtain the final ( finite for ) expressions for the source of the gravitational radiation separately for the two polarizations ( here @xmath51 , @xmath52 ) : @xmath53,\\ & \tau_{\times}(k ) = -\frac{16{\kern 1pt } g e^2}{\sqrt{2}}\ , \sin \varphi\ , \!\!\int_0 ^ 1 dx \,{{\rm e}}^{-i ( k b ) x } \biggl [ 2i \frac{\hat{k}_{2 } ( \zeta ) -\hat{k}_{1 } ( \zeta ) } { \omega b \sin \vartheta } + ( 2x-1 ) \cos \varphi \,\hat{k}_{1 } ( \zeta ) \biggr]\ , . { \nonumber}\end{aligned}\ ] ]
the emitted radiation frequency spectrum and of the total emitted energy are obtained from ( sum over the two polarizations ) : @xmath54 it will be convenient in the sequel to treat separately the six angular and frequency regimes shown in fig.[table ] . )
.,width=415 ] * zero - frequency limit .
* in the low - frequency regime ( @xmath55 ) the amplitude @xmath56 dominates and has the form @xmath57 while @xmath58 is finite ( as @xmath59 ) and gives subleading contribution to .
the angular integration leads to @xmath60 , which diverges and implies that our formulae are not valid for @xmath61 close to zero .
we can not trust our formulae in regime i and should repair them .
a quick way to do it , is to impose a small - angle cut - off @xmath62 on the @xmath63integration , so as to obtain for @xmath64 the value computed quantum mechanically in@xcite : @xmath65 which agrees with our expression for @xmath66 thus , in regime ii we use our formula , which is identical to weinberg s .
now for any frequency we have to compare our matter part , which makes the @xmath63integration divergent , with the weinberg s : @xmath67 to leading order in our approximation the scattering process , we are dealing with , is elastic with @xmath68 .
write for the incoming particles @xmath69 and for the outgoing ones @xmath70 , substitute into @xmath71 , and expand in powers of @xmath2 to have @xmath72 , to obtain the tensor which is _ identical _ to the local part @xmath37 we use , at _ any _ frequency .
therefore , it is natural to impose the angular cutoff @xmath73 for all frequencies of the emitted graviton .
* regime vi . * for @xmath74
the two radiation amplitudes read : @xmath75 from which one can obtain an estimate for the frequency distribution of the emitted radiation in regime vi by integrating over @xmath76 and over @xmath77 , namely @xmath78 as well as an estimate for the emitted energy and the corresponding efficiency in regime vi , by integrating also over @xmath79 , @xmath80 * regime iv . * inside the regime
iva the amplitude is damped as in regime vi .
however , near the left border of regime ivb ( with @xmath81 ) one may expand the amplitudes in powers of @xmath82 and obtain ( [ scalampl2dd ] ) . upon integration over regime ivb ,
i.e. for @xmath83 , one obtains @xmath84 thus , for @xmath81 one may approximate @xmath85 by @xmath86 it should be pointed out here that the integral of @xmath87 over @xmath88 receives most of its contribution from frequencies in the neighborhood of @xmath89 in both regimes iv and vi .
thus , one can say that the characteristic frequency of the emitted radiation is around @xmath90 .
* total emitted radiation . * upon integration ( [ scalampl2dd ] ) leads to the angular distribution @xmath91 integration over @xmath92 gives @xmath93
using the same approach as in @xcite , based on standard gr , with the leading non - linear gravity effects taken into account , we studied collisions of massless particles and computed the gravitational energy of arbitrary frequency , which is emitted outside the cone of angle @xmath94 in the forward and backward directions .
the value @xmath95 was obtained for the radiation efficiency , with characteristic frequency @xmath96 .
in fact , this value represents a lower bound of the efficiency , since it does not include the energy emitted inside that cone .
the frequency distribution of radiation in the characteristic angle - frequency regimes is shown in fig.[table ] .
unfortunately , we can not yet confirm the presence of any other characteristic frequency@xcite , such as e.g. @xmath97 , or characteristic emission angle smaller than @xmath2 .
we hope to return to these issues with a better understanding of regime v in the near future .
we would like to acknowledge enlightening discussions with d.galtsov , g.veneziano and d.colferai .
this work was supported in part by the eu program
thales " ( mis 375734 ) as well as by the rfbr grant 14 - 02 - 01092 . ps acknowledges the non - commercial `` dynasty '' foundation ( russian federation ) for financial support .
the work of tnt is implemented under the aristeia ii " action of the operational program
education and lifelong learning " and is co - funded by the european social fund ( esf ) and greek national resources and was also partially supported by the european union seventh framework program ( fp7-regpot-2012 - 2013 - 1 ) under grant agreement no . | problem gravitational radiation in particle collisions long history studied approaches massless-_particle collisions worth studying attracted interest of many authors relevance tev - scale gravity models large important structure string theory black - hole formation in ultra - planckian collisions complete understanding of all facets problem lacking emission of radiation in soft _ gravitons computed in@xcite quantum field theory contribution of non - linear graviton self - couplings negligible result quantum computation for low - frequency graviton emission reproduced by classical computation in@xcite new approach for computation characteristics emitted radiation based on fraunhofer approximation of radiation theory purpose to extend method to study gravitational radiation in collisions of massless particles with center - of - mass energy impact parameter formal limit @xmath5 for lorentz factor of massive case leads to nonsensical answers for radiation efficiency ratio of radiated to available energy characteristic radiation frequency emission angle study gravitational radiation in collision of massless particles using same perturbative approach as @xcite presentation based on results in@xciteaction describing massless particles gravitational interaction reads @xmath10 @xmath11 einbein trajectory @xmath12 @xmath13 summation particles unprimed primed symbols quantities related particles identical colliding particles @xmath15 @xmath16 energy each particle particles move null geodesics variation @xmath17 leads particle equation motion @xmath18 @xmath19 particle energy - momentum defined @xmath20 zeroth order gravitational interaction space - time flat particles move straight lines constant velocities @xmath21 @xmath22 traceless perturbation @xmath23 satisfies equation @xmath24 solution aichelburg metric @xmath25 @xmath26 fourier transform @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 arbitrary constant length parameter write metric @xmath31 substitute peom ] first correction trajectory unprimed particle equation @xmath32 interaction self - field omitted @xmath33 primed particle evaluated location unprimed particle unperturbed trajectory integrating peom1 obtains trajectory components @xmath34 massless particle trajectories remain undisturbed before collisionreproduce expressions two facts about geodesics in aichelburg - sexl metric time delay at shock equal to @xmath35 refraction by gravitational interaction angle @xmath36 center gravity gravitational wave source has two parts particle energy - momentum contribution localized on accelerated particle trajectories direct particle contribution to source radiation local localized on particle trajectories first order term in expansion of @xmath37 is @xmath38 @xmath39 evaluated at @xmath40 @xmath41 at @xmath42 fourier space obtains @xmath43 contribution to source second - order from expansion of einstein tensor reads @xmath44 substitution of @xmath23 and @xmath45 obtain fourier transform of @xmath46 @xmath47 integrals ( @xmath48 ) @xmath49 * total radiation amplitudes defining center mass radiation wave - vector by @xmath50 contracting two polarizations obtain final expressions source gravitational radiation two polarizations @xmath51, @xmath52 ) @xmath53 \tau\times}(k ) = -\frac{16{\kern 1pt } e^2{\sqrt{2}} \varphi_0 1 dx\frac{\hat{k}_{2 } \zeta ) -\hat{k}_{1 } \zeta\vartheta 2x-1 )\varphi{k}_{1\zeta emitted radiation frequency spectrum total emitted energy obtained from two polarizations @xmath54 treat separately six angular frequency regimes fig.[table ] zero - frequency limit low - frequency regime @xmath55 ) amplitude @xmath56 dominates form @xmath57 @xmath58 finite @xmath59 subleading contribution angular integration leads to @xmath60 implies formulae not valid for @xmath61 close to zero can not trust formulae regime i repair themquick impose small - angle cut - off @xmath62 on @xmath63integration obtain @xmath64 value computed quantum @xmath65 agrees with expression @xmath66 regime ii use formula identical to weinberg s compare matter part @xmath63integration with weinberg s @xmath67 scattering process elastic with @xmath68 write incoming particles @xmath69 outgoing @xmath70 substitute into @xmath71 expand powers @xmath2 @xmath72 obtain tensor identical to local part @xmath37 any frequency impose angular cutoff @xmath73 for all frequencies emitted graviton regime vi @xmath74 two radiation amplitudes read @xmath75 obtain estimate for frequency distribution emitted radiation regime integrating over @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 estimate emitted energy efficiency regime vi integrating @xmath79 @xmath80 regime amplitude damped vi near left border regime ivb @xmath81 expand amplitudes powers @xmath82 obtain scalampl2dd ] ) integration over regime ivb@xmath83 obtains @xmath84 @xmath81 approximate @xmath85 by @xmath86 integral @xmath87 over @xmath88 contribution from frequencies @xmath89 regimes iv vi characteristic frequency emitted radiation around @xmath90 total emitted radiation integration leads angular distribution @xmath91 integration over @xmath92 gives @xmath93 same approach @xcite studied collisions massless particles computed gravitational energy arbitrary frequency emitted outside cone angle @xmath94 forward backward directions value @xmath95 obtained for radiation efficiency characteristic frequency @xmath96 value represents lower bound efficiency include energy emitted inside cone frequency distribution radiation characteristic angle - frequency regimes shown in fig.[table ] confirm other characteristic frequency@xcite @xmath97 characteristic emission angle smaller than @xmath2 hope return issues better understanding regime v acknowledge discussions with d.galtsov g.veneziano d.colferai work supported by eu program thales rfbr grant 14 - 02 - 01092 acknowledges non - commercial dynasty '' foundation financial supportwork tnt implemented aristeia ii operational program education lifelong learning co - funded european social fund greek national resources partially supported european union seventh framework program 2013 grant agreement | 0.428673 | 2,462 | 1,258 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,966 | measurements of deep - inelastic neutral and charged current interactions are presented in lepton proton scattering at hera .
the measurements are obtained from taken during 1996 to 1999 and consists of @xmath0 of @xmath1 and @xmath2 of @xmath3 data .
the addition of the new high statistics electron data with the positron data allows the first extraction of the parity violating structure function @xmath4 and tests of high-@xmath5 electroweak effects of the heavy bosons @xmath6 and @xmath7 are observed and found to be consistent with the standard model expectation . | deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) of leptons off nucleons has played a fundamental role in understanding the structure of matter .
hera the first electron - proton ( @xmath8 ) collider ever built is capable of investigating the two main contributions to dis , neutral current ( nc ) interactions , @xmath9 and charged current ( cc ) interactions , @xmath10 . in the standard model a photon ( @xmath11 ) or a @xmath6 boson is exchanged in a nc interaction , and a @xmath12 boson is exchanged in a cc interaction .
dis can be described by the four - momentum transfer squared @xmath5 , bjorken-@xmath13 and inelasticity @xmath14 defined as : @xmath15 with @xmath16 and @xmath17 being the four - momentum of the incident ( scattered ) lepton and proton respectively .
the centre - of - mass energy @xmath18 of the @xmath8 interaction is given by @xmath19 .
in this paper measurements are presented of the nc and cc cross - sections at high @xmath20 for both electron and positron scattering from both the h1 and zeus experiments .
the integrated luminosity in the @xmath1 data sample is @xmath21 and in the @xmath3 data sample is @xmath22 for the h1 ( zeus ) collaborations .
the h1 and zeus detectors are described elsewhere @xcite,@xcite .
both detectors are nearly hermetic multi - purpose apparatus built to investigate @xmath8 interactions .
the measurements in both experiments rely primarily on the calorimetry , tracking and the luminosity detectors . in both experiments
the charged current event selection is based on the observation of large @xmath23 , which is assumed to be the transverse momentum carried by the outgoing neutrino . for nc events
it is based on the identification of a scattered electron ( positron ) , further fiducial ( nc ) and kinematic cuts ( cc and nc ) are then applied .
details of the selection procedure can be found in @xcite .
the electroweak born - level nc dis cross section @xmath24 for the reaction @xmath25 can be written as : @xmath26\ ] ] for unpolarised beams , the structure functions @xmath27 and @xmath4 can be decomposed taking into account @xmath6 exchange as : @xmath28 where @xmath29 is the mass of the @xmath6 , @xmath30 is a function of the weinberg angle @xmath31 and @xmath32 and @xmath33 are the vector and axial couplings of the electron to the @xmath6 . for unpolarised beams , @xmath27 is the same for electron and positron scattering , while @xmath4 changes sign .
the nc `` reduced cross - section '' @xmath34 is defined from the measured as : @xmath35 the born double differential cc cross - section for @xmath36 can be written in leading order qcd as : @xmath37 \label{eqn : cc}\ ] ] for @xmath3 scattering the coupling is predominantly to the @xmath38 type quarks for @xmath1 scattering the electroweak coupling is predominantly to the @xmath39 type quarks .
@xmath40\ ] ] the double differential cc `` reduced '' cross - section @xmath41 is defined as : @xmath42
the nc and cc single differential cross - sections and @xmath43 , @xmath44 are shown in fig [ fig : singdif ] , also shown are the standard model expectations given from nlo qcd fits to the data by both the cteq @xcite and the h1 @xcite collaborations .
the standard model is seen to give a good description of the data .
the measurement of he nc cross - section spans more than two orders of magnitude in @xmath5 and the cross - section falls with @xmath5 by about 6 orders of magnitude for both the @xmath1 and the @xmath3 cross section . for @xmath5 values above @xmath45
the @xmath3 cross section can be seen to be significantly above the @xmath1 cross section .
this is consistent with the standard model picture in which one expects constructive interference of the photon and @xmath6 for @xmath3 interactions and destructive interference for @xmath1 interactions . due to the propagator mass term and the different coupling
the cc cross - section is smaller than the nc cross - section and it falls less steeply , by about 3 orders of magnitude , between @xmath46 and @xmath47 for both the @xmath3 and @xmath1 cross section .
the shape and magnitude of the nc and cc cross - sections are well described by the standard model expectation .
the @xmath3 cross section is at relatively low @xmath5 to be approximately twice as big as the @xmath1 cross section , which is consistent with the standard model picture in which the @xmath38 quark density probed is expected to be approximately twice the @xmath39 quark density . shown in fig .
[ fig : singdif ] is the single differential cc cross section @xmath48 for @xmath20 for @xmath1 scattering from the zeus collaboration @xcite .
the ratio of the measured cross section @xmath48 . at high @xmath13
the @xmath1 cc cross - section depends mainly on the @xmath39 quark density which is less constrained than the @xmath38 quark density .
all data agree well with the standard model expectation using pdfs extracted from cteq4d and those from the zeus nlo fit @xcite .
the possibility of a larger @xmath49 ratio than previously assumed has been of interest in recent years , for example see @xcite .
modification @xcite of pdfs with an additional term @xmath50 yields @xmath51 close to the nlo qcd fit . the nc cross - section @xmath52 for @xmath53 is shown in fig .
[ fig : ddiff ] along with the expectations from the standard model with a @xmath6 mass of set to the pdg value , which gives a good description of the data . also shown is the expectation from the standard model with @xmath6 mass set to infinity , thereby effectively removing the weak interaction so that only photon ( @xmath11 ) exchange is possible .
it can be seen the data clearly favours the need for the @xmath6 contribution . (
-140,175)(0,0)a ) ( -140,175)(0,0)b ) ( -130,130)(0,0)c ) ( -130,140)(0,0)d )
the double differential reduced nc cross - section is shown in fig . [
fig : ddiff ] for fixed @xmath13 as a function of @xmath5 for both @xmath54 and @xmath55 data . also shown
are the expectations of the standard model which give a good description of the data . for @xmath5 values below @xmath56
the @xmath54 and @xmath55 cross - sections are within errors equal , for higher values of @xmath5 the cross sections are seen to deviate , with the @xmath3 cross - section seen to increase above the @xmath1 cross section . this difference is consistent with the change in sign of the parity violating structure function @xmath4 .
the zeus collaboration go a step further and combine the @xmath54 and @xmath55 cross sections , where @xmath0 of @xmath1 data collected at a centre of mass energy of @xmath57 were combined with @xmath58 of @xmath1 data collected at a centre of mass energy of @xmath57 . to reduce statistical fluctuations several bins from the double differential binning @xcite .
figure [ fig : ddiff ] shows @xmath4 at fixed values of @xmath5 as a function of @xmath13 . the standard model expectation evaluated with either the cteq4d or mrst(99 ) @xcite parton density functions
are seen to give a good description of the data .
the reduced cross sections as functions of @xmath13 and @xmath5 are displayed in figs .
[ fig : ddiff ] along with the prediction of the h1 nlo qcd fit @xcite .
the relative increase in the @xmath3 cross section over the @xmath1 cross section is consistent with a larger @xmath38 quark density relative to that of the @xmath39 quark .
the absolute magnitude of the cc cross section , described by equation [ eqn : cc ] is determined by the fermi constant @xmath59 and the pdfs , while the @xmath5 dependance of the cc cross - section includes the propagator term @xmath60 $ ] which produces substantial damping of the cross section .
the zeus collabiration have fitted the measured differential cross section , @xmath61 , treating @xmath59 and @xmath62 as free parameters , yields @xmath63 and @xmath64 the central values are obtained using the cteq4d pdfs .
further fits to the data were also performed @xcite , the propagator - mass fit to the measured differential cross - section , @xmath61 , with @xmath59 fixed to the value @xmath65 yields the result @xmath66 using the standard model constraint @xmath67 , @xmath29 , and all fermion masses , other than the mass of the top quark , @xmath68 , are set to the pdg values @xcite .
the central result of the fit was obtained with @xmath69 and the mass of the higgs boson @xmath70 .
the @xmath71 function is evaluated along the line given by the sm constraint , gives the following result .
from september 2000 , the luminosity of the hera collider will be increased by a factor of five . at the same time
longitudinal lepton beam polarisation will be provided for the collider experiments h1 and zeus . over a six year running period
it is anticipated that the total luminosity of @xmath73 will be delivered .
this large data volume will allow @xmath74 to be extracted with an accuracy of @xmath75 over the kinematic range @xmath76 and @xmath77 . with this accuracy it is anticipated that it will be possible to determine @xmath78 from the scaling violations of @xmath74 with a precision of @xmath79 .
the gluon distribution will also be determined from such a fit with a precision of @xmath75 for @xmath80 and @xmath81 .
there will also be a significant benefit to the cc cross - section measurement , with the potential of a clean determination of the @xmath38 and @xmath39 quark densities . with the introduction of polarised beams it will be possible to obtain a measurement of the vector and axial - vector couplings of the @xmath38-quark , @xmath82 and @xmath83 respectively , obtained in a fit in which @xmath82 and @xmath83 are allowed to vary . with a luminosity of @xmath84 per charge , polarisation combination and taking the vector and axial - vector couplings of the @xmath38 and @xmath39-quarks as free parameters
gives a precision of 13 % , 6 % , 17 % for @xmath82 , @xmath85 , @xmath86 and @xmath87 respectively . by comparing the nc couplings of the @xmath88 and @xmath89-quarks obtained at lep , it will be possible to test the universality of the nc couplings .
the latest deep - inelastic neutral and charge current cross - sections have been presented from the h1 and zeus experiments .
the standard model is seen to give a good description of the data in all cases .
the high luminosity data at high @xmath5 from both experiments has enabled the first tests of electroweak effects in both neutral and charged current interactions . in nc interactions
the data are seen to be consistent with the effect of @xmath90 interference and has allowed the first extraction of the parity violating structure function @xmath4 at high @xmath5 . with the factor of five increase in yearly luminosity expected from the hera upgrade further high precision tests of the strong and weak interaction
will be made .
the future cc measurements will allow precision determinations of the @xmath38 and @xmath39 quark densities and a determination of the vector and axial - vector couplings of the quarks from the nc interaction , providing important information for future high energy hadron colliders such as the lhc .
the h1 detector h1 collab . , i. abt et al .
meth . the zeus detector , status report 1993 , desy ( 1993 ) .
* a336 * ( 1993 ) 460 .
h1 collab .
, c. adloff et al . , eur phys j * c 13 * ( 2000 ) 609 - 639 particle data group , c. caso et al . , eur .
j. * c3 * ( 1998 ) 1 .
lai et al . , phys . rev .
* d55 * ( 1997 ) 1280 .
m. botje , _ a qcd analysis of hera and fixed target structure function data _ , desy 99 - 038 , nikhef-99 - 011
( in preparation ) . u.k .
yang and a. bodek , _ phys .
* 82 * ( 1999 ) 2467 .
w. melnitchouk and a.w .
thomas , _ phys .
lett . _ * b377 * ( 1996 ) 11 ; + w. melnitchouk and j.c .
peng , _ phys .
lett . _ * b400 * ( 1997 ) 220 . | inelastic scattering of leptons off nucleons structure matter first electron - proton @xmath8 collider neutral current nc interactions charged current cc interactions standard model photon or @xmath6 boson exchanged in nc @xmath12 cc interaction dis described by four - momentum transfer @xmath5 bjorken-@xmath13 inelasticity @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 four - momentum of incident lepton and proton centre - of - mass energy of @xmath8 interaction given by @xmath19 measurements of nc and cc cross - sections at high @xmath20 for electron and positron scattering from h1 and zeus experiments integrated luminosity in @xmath1 is @xmath21 @xmath22 for h1 zeus collaborations h1 and zeus detectors described hermetic @xmath8 interactions measurements rely on calorimetry tracking luminosity detectors charged current event selection based on observation of large @xmath23 transverse momentum outgoing neutrino for nc events based on identification scattered electron fiducial nc kinematic cuts appliedselection procedure in @xcite electroweak born - level nc cross section @xmath24 @xmath25 as @xmath26 unpolarised beams structure functions @xmath27 @xmath4 decomposed as @xmath28 @xmath29 mass @xmath6 @xmath30 function weinberg angle @xmath31 vector axial couplings electron @xmath6 unpolarised beams @xmath27 same electron positron scattering @xmath4 changes sign nc reduced cross - section @xmath34 defined @xmath35 double differential cc cross - section @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath3 scattering coupling @xmath38 type quarks @xmath1 scattering @xmath39 type quarks double differential cc reduced cross - section @xmath41 defined as @xmath42 nc cc single differential cross - sections @xmath43 @xmath44 shown in fig standard model expectations data cteq @xcite h1 @xcite collaborations standard model data measurement nc cross - section two orders magnitude in @xmath5 cross - falls with @xmath5 6 orders @xmath1 @xmath3 cross section@xmath5 values above @xmath3 cross section above @xmath1 cross consistent standard model constructive interference photon @xmath6 destructive interference propagator mass different coupling cc cross - section smaller nc falls less steeply 3 orders between @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath3 @xmath1 cross section shape magnitude nc cc cross - sections described standard model expectation @xmath3 cross section low @xmath5 twice big @xmath1 cross consistent standard model @xmath38 quark density twice @xmath39 quark density fig . single differential cc cross section @xmath48 @xmath20 @xmath1 zeus collaboration ratio cross section high @xmath13 @xmath1 cc cross - section depends @xmath39 quark density less constrained @xmath38 data agree standard model expectation pdfs cteq4d zeus nlo fit @xcite larger @xmath49 ratio interest modification pdfs additional term @xmath50 yields @xmath51 close to nlo qcd fit nc cross - section @xmath52 for @xmath53 shown fig .fig : ddiff ] expectations standard model @xmath6 mass set pdg value good description data expectation @xmath6 mass set infinity removing weak interaction photon ( @xmath11 ) exchange data favours @xmath6 contribution -140)a double differential reduced nc cross - section fig . ddiff fixed @xmath13 function of @xmath5 @xmath54 @xmath55 data expectations standard model good description data @xmath5 values below @xmath56 @xmath54 @xmath55 cross - sections errors equal higher values @xmath5 cross sections deviate @xmath3 cross - section increase above @xmath1 cross section difference consistent with change parity violating structure function @xmath4 zeus collaboration @xmath54 @xmath55 cross sections @xmath0 @xmath1 data combined with @xmath58 @xmath1 data reduce statistical fluctuations bins double differential binning @xcite figure ddiff shows @xmath4 at fixed values @xmath5 function of @xmath13 standard model expectation evaluated cteq4d or mrst(99 ) @xcite parton density functions good description datareduced cross sections @xmath13 @xmath5 displayed in figs prediction h1 nlo qcd fit @xcite increase in @xmath3 cross section consistent with larger @xmath38 quark density @xmath39 quark magnitude cc cross section determined by fermi constant @xmath59 pdfs @xmath5 dependance includes propagator term @xmath60 damping zeus collabiration fitted differential cross section @xmath61 @xmath59 @xmath62 yields @xmath63 @xmath64 central values obtained using cteq4d pdfs further fits data performed @xcite propagator - mass fit to cross - section @xmath61 @xmath59 fixed @xmath65 yields result @xmath66 model @xmath67 @xmath29 fermion masses set to pdg values @xcite central result obtained with @xmath69 mass higgs boson @xmath70 @xmath71 function evaluated sm constraint from september 2000 luminosity hera collider increased factor five longitudinal lepton beam polarisation provided for collider experiments h1 zeus six year total luminosity of @xmath73 deliveredlarge data volume @xmath74 extracted accuracy @xmath75 over range @xmath76 determine @xmath78 from scaling violations @xmath74 precision @xmath79 gluon distribution determined precision @xmath75 for @xmath80 @xmath81 significant benefit to cc cross - section measurement potential clean determination @xmath38 @xmath39 quark densities introduction polarised beams measurement vector axial - vector couplings @xmath38-quark @xmath82 @xmath83 luminosity @xmath84 per charge polarisation combination couplings @xmath38 @xmath39-quarks precision 13 % 6 % 17 % for @xmath82 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 comparing nc couplings @xmath88 @xmath89-quarks lep test universality nc couplings latest deep - inelastic neutral charge current cross - sections from h1 zeus experiments standard model good description data high luminosity data at @xmath5 enabled first tests electroweak effects in neutral charged current interactions nc interactions data consistent with effect @xmath90 interference first extraction of parity violating structure function @xmath4 at high @xmath5factor five increase yearly luminosity hera upgrade high precision tests strong weak interaction future cc measurements allow @xmath38 @xmath39 quark densities vector couplings nc interaction information future high energy hadron colliders h1 detector collab abt al zeus detector status report 1993 1993 a336 1993 ) 460 h1 collab adloff al phys j 13 2000 ) 609 - 639 particle data group caso et al c3 1998 ) lai et al phys . rev d55 1997 ) 1280 botje qcd analysis hera fixed target structure function data desy 99 - 038 nikhef-99 - 011 preparation yang bodek phys . 82 1999 ) 2467 melnitchouk thomas phys . lett b377 1996 ) 11 melnitchouk peng phys . b400 1997 ) 220 | 0.439383 | 3,047 | 1,615 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,967 | we carry out a numerical simulation of a domain - wall model in ( 4 + 1 ) dimensions , in the presence of a quenched u(1 ) dynamical gauge field only in an extra dimension , corresponding to the weak coupling limit of a ( 4-dimensional ) physical gauge coupling .
our numerical data suggest that the zero mode seems absent in the symmetric phase , so that it is difficult to construct a lattice chiral gauge theory in the continuum limit . | construction of chiral gauge theory is one of the long standing problems of lattice field theories . because of the fermion doubling problem ,
the lattice field theory discretized naively becomes non - chiral .
several approaches on lattice have been proposed to overcome this difficulties , but none of them have been proven to be successful . recently kaplan has proposed a domain - wall model in order to construct lattice chiral gauge theories@xcite .
the model consists of wilson fermion action in ( 2@xmath0 + 1 ) dimensions with a fermion mass term being the shape of a domain wall in the ( extra ) ( 2@xmath0 + 1)th dimension . in the case of free fermions
it is shown for @xmath1 , where @xmath2 denotes the domain wall mass height , that a massless chiral state arises as a zero mode bound to the @xmath3-dimensional domain wall while all doublers have large masses of the lattice cutoff scale . in a way of introducing dynamical gauge fields two variants of this model
have been proposed : the waveguide model@xcite and the overlap formula@xcite .
however , it has been reported that the chiral zero mode disappears for these two variants even in the weak coupling limit , due to the roughness of gauge field@xcite . in the original model the roughness of the gauge field
is replaced with the dynamical gauge field in the extra dimension , and in the weak coupling limit of the @xmath3 dimensional coupling , @xmath3 dimensional links @xmath4 = 1 ( @xmath5 ) while only extra dimensional links @xmath6 become dynamical .
we would like to know whether the fermionic zero modes exist on the domain wall or not in this limit .
this question has already been investigated in ( 2 + 1 ) dimensions@xcite , but the result , in particular , in the symmetric phase is not conclusive , due to peculiarity of the phase transition in the 2 dimensional u(1 ) spin model .
therefore we numerically investigate this model with u(1 ) gauge field in ( 4 + 1 ) dimensions and report the result here .
before numerical investigation we estimate the effect of the dynamical gauge field in the extra dimension using the mean - field analysis . in our mean - field analysis
all link variables in the extra dimension are replaced with @xmath7-independent constant @xmath8 @xmath9 , so that the fermion propagator is easily obtained@xcite @xmath10 here was denoted @xmath11 @xmath12 in ref.@xcite ] @xmath13_{s , t } \nonumber , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath14 and @xmath15 .
corresponding fermion masses are obtained from @xmath11 and @xmath16 in @xmath17 limit , and we found that fermionic zero modes exist only for @xmath18 .
thus the critical value of domain wall mass is @xmath19 and therefore no zero mode survives if @xmath20 .
we investigated the ( 4 + 1 ) dimensional u(1 ) model numerically , using a quenched approximation . at the zero physical gauge coupling the gauge field action of the model
is reduced to the @xmath3 dimensional spin model with many copies : @xmath21,\ ] ] where @xmath22 .
therefore there exists a phase transition which separates a broken phase from a symmetric phase .
we calculated the order parameter @xmath23 using a rotational technique@xcite and found @xmath24 corresponds to the symmetric phase and @xmath25 to the broken phase .
we calculated the fermion propagator over 50 configurations at @xmath25 and 0.29 on @xmath26 lattices with @xmath274 , 6 , 8 .
for the fermion field we take periodic boundary conditions except the anti - periodic boundary condition in the 4th direction .
the errors are estimated by the single elimination jack - knife method . at @xmath28
we obtained the inverse propagator @xmath29 and @xmath30 for @xmath31 as a function of @xmath32 .
we obtain fermion mass squared , @xmath33 , by extrapolating @xmath29 and @xmath30 linearly to @xmath34 . in fig.[fig : broken ] we plotted @xmath35 in the broken phase ( @xmath25 ) as a function of @xmath2 .
= 7.5 cm as seen from this figure , the finite size effect is small , and the left - handed modes are always massive , while the right - handed modes are massless if @xmath2 is larger than about @xmath36 .
therefore , we conclude that chiral zero modes can exist in the broken phase .
let us show the fermion mass in the symmetric phase ( @xmath24 ) in fig.[fig : symmetric ] . in the smallest lattice size
the chiral zero modes seem to exist .
= 7.5 cm however , for large lattices , the mass difference between the left- and right - handed modes becomes smaller .
this suggest that the fermion spectrum becomes vector - like in the infinite volume limit .
however , since the fermion mass near @xmath37 is so small , from this data alone , we can not exclude a possibility that the critical mass @xmath38 is very close to @xmath39 . to make a definite conclusion on the absence of chiral zero modes in the symmetric phase , we try to fit the fermion propagator using the form of the mean - field propagator with the fitting parameter @xmath8 .
we show the quality of the fit in fig.[fig : propr ] .
= 7.5 cm this figure shows that the fermion propagator is well described by the mean - field propagator . in fig.[fig :
fittingr ] and fig.[fig : fittingl ] we plotted the parameter @xmath8 obtained the above fit as a function of @xmath40 = 7.5 cm = 7.5 cm the parameter @xmath8 s are almost independent of @xmath2 at the each @xmath40 except for the right - handed ones at @xmath41 .
the solid circles represent the order parameter @xmath23 .
the behaviors of @xmath8 at different @xmath2 are almost identical each other and are very similar to that of @xmath23 except the right - handed ones at @xmath41 .
this suggest that @xmath8 can be identified with @xmath23 and therefore @xmath8 becomes zero as the lattice size goes to the infinity .
if this is the case the fermion spectrum of this model becomes vector - like in the symmetric phase .
we have carried out the numerical simulations of the u(1 ) original domain - wall model in ( 4 + 1 ) dimensions in the weak coupling limit of the 4-dimensional coupling . in the broken phase
, there exist chiral zero modes on the domain wall for @xmath42 .
the existence of the critical mass @xmath38 is predicted by the mean - field analysis . on the other hand , in the symmetric phase
, the analysis using the mean - field propagator suggests that this model becomes vector - like .
we should note , however , that the right - handed modes at @xmath41 behaves differently and the similar behavior was also found in the ( 2 + 1 ) dimensional model@xcite .
therefore in the future , we must investigate this point in detail , for example , increasing the statistics .
besides this point the results from both phases suggest that this model becomes vector - like in the continuum limit , which should be taken at the critical point (: the point between two phases ) .
therefore , it seems also difficult to construct a chiral gauge theory on lattice via the original domain - wall model . 9 d.b .
kaplan , phys .
* b288 * , ( 1992 ) 342 .
golterman , k. jansen , d.n .
petcher , and j.c .
vink , phys .
* d49 * , ( 1994 ) 1606 ; m.f.l .
golterman and y. shamir , phys . rev .
* d51 * , ( 1995 ) 3026 .
r. narayanan and h. neuberger , nucl .
* b412 * , ( 1994 ) 574 .
s. aoki and k. nagai , phys .
* d53 * , ( 1996 ) 5058 . | construction chiral gauge theory lattice field theories fermion doubling problem lattice field theory becomes non - chiral approaches proposed none successful kaplan proposed domain - wall model lattice chiral gauge theories model wilson fermion action in ( 2@xmath0 + 1 ) dimensions fermion mass term shape domain wall in extra 2@xmath0 + 1)th dimension free fermions massless chiral state arises as zero mode bound to @xmath3-dimensional domain wall doublers have large masses dynamical gauge two variants proposed waveguide model overlap formula chiral zero mode disappears weak coupling limit due to roughness gauge field original model roughness replaced with dynamical gauge field in extra dimension weak coupling limit @xmath3 @xmath3 dimensional links @xmath4 = 1 ( @xmath5 ) extra dimensional links @xmath6 become dynamical fermionic zero modes exist on domain wall investigated in ( 2 + 1 ) dimensions result symmetric phase not conclusive due to peculiarity phase transition in 2 dimensional u(1 ) spin modelinvestigate model u(1 ) gauge field 4 + 1 dimensions report result estimate effect dynamical gauge field extra dimension mean - field analysis link variables replaced with @xmath7-independent constant fermion propagator denoted fermion masses obtained from @xmath11 @xmath16 fermionic zero modes for @xmath18 critical value domain wall mass is @xmath19 no zero mode survives if @xmath20 investigated 4 + 1 ) dimensional u(1 ) model numerically quenched approximation zero physical gauge coupling field action reduced to @xmath3 dimensional spin model phase transition separates broken phase from symmetric phase calculated order parameter @xmath23 rotational technique @xmath24 symmetric phase @xmath25 broken phase calculated fermion propagator over 50 configurations at @xmath25 0.29 on @xmath26 lattices with @xmath274 6 8 fermion field periodic boundary conditions anti - periodic 4th direction errors estimated by single elimination jack - knife method@xmath28 obtained inverse propagator @xmath29 @xmath31 function @xmath32 obtain fermion mass squared @xmath33 extrapolating @xmath29 to @xmath34 fig. plotted @xmath35 broken phase @xmath25 function @xmath2 7.5 cm finite size effect small left - handed modes massive right - handed modes massless if @xmath2 larger than @xmath36 chiral zero modes exist in broken phase fermion mass symmetric phase @xmath24 ) fig. smallest lattice size chiral zero modes exist 7.5 cm large lattices mass difference left right - handed modes smaller fermion spectrum becomes vector - like infinite volume limit fermion mass near @xmath37 small critical mass @xmath38 close to @xmath39 absence chiral zero modes symmetric phase fit fermion propagator mean - field propagator fitting parameter @xmath8 quality fit in fig. = 7.5 cm fermion propagator described by mean - field propagator fig.: fittingl plotted parameter @xmath8 fit function @xmath40 = 7.5 cm @xmath8 independent of @xmath2 at @xmath40 except right - handed ones @xmath41 solid circles represent order parameter @xmath23 behaviors @xmath8 at @xmath2 identical similar @xmath23 except right - handed at @xmath41 @xmath8 identified with @xmath23 becomes zero lattice size infinity fermion spectrum becomes vector - like in symmetric phase numerical simulations original domain - wall model in ( 4 + 1 ) dimensions weak coupling limit broken phase chiral zero modes domain wall for @xmath42 critical mass @xmath38 predicted by mean - field analysis symmetric phase analysis - field suggests model becomes vector - like right - handed modes at @xmath41 differently similar behavior in ( 2 + 1 ) dimensional model@xcite investigate point statistics results both phases suggest model becomes vector - like in continuum limit critical point difficult to construct chiral gauge theory on lattice via original domain - wall model kaplan phys. b288 1992 ) 342 golterman jansenpetcher j vink . d49 1994 ) 1606 golterman shamir phys. d51 1995 ) 3026 narayanan neuberger nucl. b412 1994 ) 574 s aoki k. nagai . d53 1996 ) 5058 | 0.3167 | 1,851 | 935 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,971 | a model of scalar quarks and scalar gluons is used to derive transport equations for quarks and gluons . in particular , the collision integral is studied .
the self - energy diagrams are organized according to the number of loops .
a generalized boltzmann equation is obtained , which involves at the level up to two loops all possible two @xmath0 two parton scattering processes and corrections to the process @xmath1 .
0.35 cm 0.45 cm -1 cm | the model underpinning our calculations successfully gives a @xmath2 behavior in high energy @xmath3 scattering @xcite .
quarks and antiquarks are described by complex scalar fields @xmath4 , and gluons as the scalar field @xmath5 coupled through the lagrangian @xmath6 the quarks are massless , while the gluons are assigned a mass @xmath7 in order to avoid infra - red divergences . since in qcd
the quartic interaction between gluons leads to terms which are sub - leading in ln @xmath8 , it is not included here .
the two labels on each of the fields refer to the direct product of two color groups which is necessary to make the three gluon vertex symmetric under the exchange of two bosonic gluons .
to describe non - equilibrium phenomena , we use the green functions of the schwinger - keldysh formalism @xcite .
the equations of motion for the wigner transforms of the green functions , the so - called transport and constraint equations , are derived @xcite and read @xmath9 and @xmath10 where @xmath11 is a generic green function , @xmath12 for quarks and @xmath13 for gluons .
@xmath14 is the appropriate mass , and @xmath15 is the collision term , @xmath16 @xmath17 and @xmath18 are terms containing retarded and advanced components : @xmath19 in eqs.([e : collision ] ) to ( [ e : pim ] ) , @xmath20 is a generic self - energy ( @xmath21 for quarks and @xmath22 for gluons ) and the operator @xmath23 is given by @xmath24 for the green functions , we use the quasiparticle approximation : @xmath25 @xmath26 is obtained from the expression for @xmath11 by replacing @xmath27 with @xmath28 and vice versa .
@xmath29 is the quark ( @xmath30 ) or the gluon ( @xmath31 ) distribution function , @xmath32 is an abbreviation for @xmath33 .
then an evolution equation for the parton distribution function is obtained by integrating eq.([e : transport ] ) over an interval @xmath34 that contains the energy @xmath35 .
to lowest order in an expansion that sets @xmath36 , the integral for the collision term is performed in the next section .
for the collision integral , one has @xmath37 _ i.e. _ the off - diagonal quasiparticle self - energies are required to be calculated on shell . in the following , only the results for the quarks are presented , the generalization to the gluons is then obvious .
the self - energies are organized now according to their number of loops .
the hartree self - energies ( self - energy with a quark or a gluon loop ) vanish due to their color factors as it is the case for real qcd .
the fock self - energy gives a contribution to the loss term of the collision integral in eq.([e : collint ] ) given by @xcite @xmath38 here , @xmath39 means the scattering amplitude of the process @xmath1 of order @xmath40 which is pictured in fig.1 a ) .
processes as @xmath41 , @xmath42 or @xmath43 are kinematically forbidden and therefore do not occur in this collision integral .
the gain term can be obtained by exchanging @xmath27 with @xmath28 in eq.([e : lossint ] ) .
the two loop self - energy graphs are pictured in fig.2 . according to their topology ,
they are called rainbow ( r ) , ladder ( l ) , cloud ( c ) , exchange ( e ) and quark - loop ( ql ) graphs .
let us first consider the contribution of the seven diagrams ra ) , la ) , ca ) , cb ) , ea ) , eb ) and qla ) to the collision integral .
the first five of these diagrams lead to the ( lowest order ) scattering amplitudes of the processes @xmath44 and @xmath45 , while the latter two lead to the ( lowest order ) scattering amplitudes of the processes @xmath46 and @xmath47 @xcite .
thus , to obtain _ all _ possible @xmath48 processes it is necessary to consider all types of diagrams .
but an analysis of the color factors shows that the quark - loop diagrams are subleading as it is the case in real qcd .
therefore , in an additional expansion in the inverse number of colors , @xmath49 , one can neglect the processes @xmath46 and @xmath47 .
that means that gluon production is favored .
the three diagrams rd ) , ld ) and qld ) vanish due to the momentum structure of their propagators @xcite . to see the purpose of the remaining ten diagrams @xcite , i.e. rb ) , rc ) ,
lb ) , lc ) , cc ) , cd ) , ec ) , ed ) , qlb ) and qlc ) , we investigate first the process @xmath1 which is shown up to order @xmath50 in fig.1 .
@xmath51 was given in lowest order by the fock term .
to construct it up to order @xmath52 , one has to take the hermitian conjugate of the scattering amplitude of fig.1a ) and multiply it with each of the scattering amplitudes of fig.1b)-g ) .
it is also necessary to take the hermitian conjugate of each of these products , too . using a symbolical notation , we write these products as @xmath53 .
then a detailed analysis shows that each of these products , with the exception of @xmath54 and @xmath55 , is provided by one of the above mentioned ten self - energy diagrams .
the diagram g ) of fig.1 does not enter into the collision integral , as it is a renormalization diagram for the incoming quark , for which the momentum @xmath56 is fixed externally .
so far , we have constructed the collision integral out of self - energy diagrams with graphs up to two loops .
let us now return to the transport equation ( [ e : transport ] ) . if we integrate the left hand side over the interval @xmath34 and neglect the contributions of @xmath57 and @xmath58 on the right hand side , then we get for the transport equation up to order @xmath52 @xmath59.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the generalization to higher orders is then obvious .
including , e.g. , the three loop self - energy into the collision term leads to cross sections of all kinematically allowed processes with two ( three ) partons in the initial state and three ( two ) partons in the final state .
furthermore , they give all additional corrections of order @xmath60 to the process @xmath1 , e.g. the product of scattering amplitudes of the diagrams b)-f ) in fig.2 , and also corrections to the scattering processes of two partons into two partons .
one may speculate that pinch singularities could enter into the collision integral up to the two loop level .
in fact this is not so , and has been explicitly demonstrated @xcite .
9999 j.r . forshaw and d.a .
ross , _ quantum chromodynamics and the pomeron _ ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 1997 ) .
j. schwinger , j. math . phys . * 2 * , 407 ( 1961 ) ; l.v .
keldysh , jetp * 20 * , 1018 ( 1965 ) .
s. mrwczyski and u. heinz , _ ann .
( n.y . ) * 229 * , 1 ( 1994 ) .
klevansky , a. ogura , and j. hfner , _ ann .
* 261 * , 261 ( 1997 ) .
isert and s.p .
klevansky , hep - ph/9905289 .
isert and s.p .
klevansky , hep - ph/9912203 . | model calculations gives @xmath2 behavior high energy @xmath3 scattering @xcite quarks antiquarks described by scalar fields @xmath4 gluons scalar field @xmath5 @xmath6 quarks massless gluons assigned mass @xmath7 avoid infra - red divergences quartic interaction between gluons leads terms sub - leading in ln @xmath8 not included two labels on fields refer two color groups gluon vertex symmetric bosonic gluons non - equilibrium phenomena use green functions schwinger - keldysh formalism equations motion for wigner transforms transport constraint equations derived @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 generic green function quarks gluons @xmath14 appropriate mass collision term terms retarded advanced components @xmath19 collision pim @xmath20 generic self - energy for quarks gluons operator @xmath23 @xmath24 for green functions quasiparticle approximation @xmath25 @xmath26 obtained from @xmath11 replacing @xmath27 with @xmath28@xmath29 quark or gluon distribution function @xmath32 abbreviation for @xmath33 evolution equation for parton distribution function integrating eq.([e : transport ] ) over interval @xmath34 energy @xmath35 lowest order expansion @xmath36 integral collision term next section collision integral @xmath37 off - diagonal quasiparticle self - energies calculated on results for quarks presented generalization to gluons self - energies organized according to number of loops hartree self - energies vanish due to color factors fock self - energy to loss term collision integral eq.( @xmath38 @xmath39 scattering amplitude of process @xmath1 order @xmath40 pictured in fig.1 a processes @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 kinematically forbidden occur in collision integral gain term exchanging @xmath27 with @xmath28 in eq.([e : lossint ] ) two loop self - energy graphs in fig.2 called rainbow ladder cloud exchange quark - loop graphsconsider contribution seven diagrams ra la ca cb ea eb qla ) to collision integral first five diagrams lead to scattering amplitudes processes @xmath44 @xmath45 latter two lowest amplitudes @xmath46 @xmath47 to obtain @xmath48 processes necessary consider all types diagrams analysis color shows quark - loop diagrams subleading real qcd additional expansion colors @xmath49 neglect processes @xmath46 @xmath47 gluon production favored three diagrams rd ) ld ) qld ) vanish due to momentum structure propagators @xcite purpose remaining ten diagrams @xcite rb rc lb lc cc cd ec ed qlb qlc investigate process @xmath1 shown up to order @xmath50 in fig.1 @xmath51 lowest order by fock term to construct up to order @xmath52 hermitian conjugate scattering amplitude fig.1a ) multiply with scattering amplitudes fig.1b)-g ) necessary take hermitian conjugate each products write products as @xmath53 detailed analysis shows products exception @xmath54 @xmath55 provided by ten self - energy diagrams diagram g ) of fig.1 enter collision integral renormalization diagram for incoming quark momentum @xmath56 fixed externally constructed collision integral out of self - energy diagrams up to two loops return to transport equation integrate left side over interval @xmath34 neglect contributions @xmath57 @xmath58 transport equation up to order @xmath52 @xmath59 generalization to higher orders obvious three loop self - energy collision term leads to cross sections of processes with two partons initial final state additional corrections of order @xmath60 to process @xmath1 scattering amplitudes of diagrams b)-f ) in fig.2 corrections scattering processes of two pinch singularities could enter into collision integral up to two loop level not demonstrated j.r forshaw d ross quantum chromodynamics pomeron cambridge university press 1997 j schwinger math . phys . 407 ( 1961 ) l keldysh 1018 ( 1965 ) mrwczyskiheinz ann 229 1 ( 1994 ) klevansky a ogura j. hfner ann 261 ( 1997 ) isert klevansky hep - ph/9905289 klevansky hep ph/9912203 | 0.315726 | 1,782 | 910 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,987 | we present a new lattice super yang - mills theory and its susy transformation . after our formulation of the model in a fundamental lattice
, it is extended to the whole lattice with a substructure of modulo 2 . | a lattice formulation is one of the most powerful tools for a nonperturbative study .
we present here a completely new formulation of the super yang - mills theory on lattice with an exact fermionic symmetry .
there are several pionieering attempts for contructing super yang - mills theories on lattice .
the first approach , the wilson fermion and mass fine - tuning procedure , is a well - simulated method @xcite .
it is based on an observation that , in the perturbative expansion , a gaugino mass is the unique relevant operator which breaks supersymmetry around the susy fixed point @xcite .
nevertheless , nobody knows whether this observation is nonperturbatively correct and there exists the susy fixed point in the wilson fermion theory .
second is an appoach with the staggered fermion @xcite .
this formulation may allow us to have a correspondence between fermion and boson . however , the counting of the degrees of freedom is still difficult for yang - mills theory and the full theory has not been constructed until now .
third approach is based on the domain wall fermion @xcite .
this approach naturally has a vanishing mechanism of the gaugino mass , although , in order to impose a majorana condition , one must introduce a nonlocal condition along the fifth direction .
a simulation has also been done @xcite .
our new formulation may look like the second approach in some aspects .
however , the crucial difference is the presence of an exact fermionic symmetry in our formulation .
no fine - tuning is required for the symmetry and we show that it is not brs - like .
we start our consideration with a model defined on a fundamental lattice .
the model will be called as the one - cell model .
then we show that the model may be extended to the whole space while keeping the fermionic symmetry found for the one - cell model .
the extended model has a slightly unusual lattice structure , which will be explained later .
in this section , we present the lattice action and susy transformations for the one - cell model . each coordinate of a site takes only 0 or 1 in the unit of @xmath0 ( lattice constant ) .
our action of gauge and fermion system is a normal one except the facts that it is resricted on a fundamental lattice and fermi fields , @xmath1 , are real .
@xmath2 @xmath3 where @xmath4 is a base point for the plaquette @xmath5 and a symbol @xmath6 implies @xmath7 for the @xmath8 coordinate .
the lattice has one plaquette in d=2 case and six plaquettes in d=3 .
the coefficients @xmath9 of the fermion action appear similarly to the usual staggered fermion .
however the fermion here is the real fermion .
we also use the symbol @xmath10 to indicate either @xmath11 or @xmath12 , allowed inside the cell when we start from the site @xmath13 .
the susy transformation of gauge fields is defined as @xmath14 where @xmath15 is a gauge - covariantly translated fermion , @xmath16 and @xmath17 is a grassmannian parameter . for fermi fields , we write the transformation as @xmath18 where @xmath19 implies @xmath20 and @xmath21 is a grassmannian parameter .
now , we derive relations between the introduced parameters , which are required for the susy invariance . they come from four important conditions .
this is the invariance of the fermion action under gauge field variation .
it is nothing but the vanishing condition of fermion cubed terms : @xmath22 note that this condition is consistent with the staggered majorana fermion ; @xmath23 here @xmath24 is a constant and the constraint on @xmath17 is @xmath25 in particular , we find that any diagonal element vanishes @xmath26 by satisfying the first and second conditions altogether , the total action becomes invariant under the susy transformation .
the second condition produces two types of graphs , i.e. those with three different indices and those with two different indices . corresponding to two types of graphs , we find the relations , @xmath27,\ ] ] @xmath28 third one is to confirm that this symmetry is not brs - like .
we see that this condition is trivially satisfied because the left hand sides of the relations obtained from the second condition are nonzero .
the condition is not so trivial .
we consider in two steps .
( a ) in the first step , only fermion variables change .
@xmath29 @xmath30 ( b ) in the second step only gauge field variables change .
@xmath31 @xmath32 where @xmath33 .
it is easy to show that jacobian @xmath34 . but
@xmath35 implies @xmath36 .
this is consistent with the solution for the first condition .
we have completed the check of the susy invariance of our one - cell model .
now , we extend one - cell model to the whole space .
if we do it naiively , we encounter @xmath37 reduced susy not @xmath38 .
so we have to consider a new type lattice theory .
let us decompose the whole lattice into three units .
( b ) in a blue unit , a one - cell model lives . (
r ) in a red unit , another one - cell model lives .
( bl ) in blank , there are no cell models . our total action is obtained by summing over blue and red cells . from a point of view in fields ,
\(a ) ( gauge fields ) are in either a blue or a red cell .
\(b ) are put only in a blue or red cell but .
\(c ) ( fermi fields ) are on a boundary site of a blue or red cell .
so fermi fields have dual property .
now we have to check not only the in - cell condition but also inter - cell conditions .
there are many constraints but we can find a solution .
let us summarize our work and give some discussions .
we presented a new model for lattice super yang - mills theory . after finding the susy invariant one - cell model ,
it is extended to the whole space .
note that the representation of a link variable , @xmath39 , must be real as the susy transformation of a fermi field .
finally , the embedding pattern of the one - cell model allows the modulo 2 translational invariance .
the pattern may imply an embedding of spinor structure to lattice . in our forthcoming paper @xcite
, some discussions will be given on this point .
9 g. curci and g. veneziano , nucl.phys .
b292 ( 1987 ) 555 .
i. montvay , nucl .
63 ( 1998 ) 108 .
y. taniguchi , phys .
d63 ( 2001 ) 014502 .
h. aratyn , m. goto and a.h .
zimerman , nuovo cim
. a88 ( 1985 ) 225 .
h. aratyn and a.h .
zimerman , j.phys.a18 ( 1985 ) l487 .
d. b. kaplan and m. schmaltz , chin .
38 ( 2000 ) 543
. g. t. fleming , j. b. kogut and p. m. vranas , phys .
d64 ( 2001 ) 034510 .
k. itoh , m. kato , h. sawanaka , h. so and n. ukita , in preparation . | lattice formulation powerful for nonperturbative study present new formulation super yang - mills theory on lattice with exact fermionic symmetry several attempts for contructing super yang - mills theories on lattice first approach wilson fermion mass fine - tuning procedure well - simulated based on observation gaugino mass unique operator breaks supersymmetry around susy fixed point knows observation correct susy fixed point in wilson fermion theory second appoach with staggered fermion formulation correspondence between fermion boson counting degrees of freedom difficult for - theory full theory not constructed third approach domain wall fermion vanishing mechanism of gaugino mass impose majorana condition must introduce nonlocal condition along fifth direction simulation done new formulation like second approach crucial difference exact fermionic symmetry no fine - tuning required for symmetry not brs - like start consideration with model defined on fundamental lattice one - cell model extended to whole space keeping fermionic symmetry one - cell extended model unusual lattice structure explained later present lattice action susy transformations for one - cell modelcoordinate site takes 0 or 1 @xmath0 lattice constant action gauge fermion system normal resricted on fundamental lattice fermi fields @xmath1 real @xmath4 base point plaquette @xmath5 @xmath6 implies @xmath7 @xmath8 coordinate lattice one plaquette d=2 six d=3 coefficients @xmath9 fermion action staggered fermion fermion real fermion symbol @xmath10 @xmath11 or @xmath12 site @xmath13 susy transformation gauge fields @xmath14 @xmath15 gauge - covariantly translated fermion @xmath16 grassmannian parameter fermi fields transformation @xmath18 @xmath19 implies @xmath20 @xmath21 grassmannian parameter derive relations between introduced parameters required susy invariance four conditions invariance fermion action under gauge field variation vanishing condition of fermion cubed terms @xmath22 consistent with staggered majorana fermion @xmath23 constant constraint @xmath17 @xmath25 diagonal element vanishes @xmath26 conditions total action becomes invariant under susy transformation second condition produces two types graphs three indices twotwo graphs find relations @xmath27 @xmath28 confirm symmetry not brs - like condition satisfied left hand sides relations second condition nonzero condition not trivial consider two steps first step only fermion variables change @xmath29 @xmath30 second step gauge field variables change @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 show jacobian @xmath34 @xmath35 implies @xmath36 consistent with solution first condition completed check susy invariance one - cell model extend one - cell model to whole space encounter @xmath37 reduced susy not @xmath38 consider new type lattice theory decompose lattice into three units blue unit one - cell model lives red unit another one - cell model lives blank no cell models total action summing over blue and red cells fields gauge fields in blue or red cell\(b ) only blue or red cell(c fermi fields on boundary site blue or red cell fermi fields dual property check in - inter - cell conditions many constraints find solution summarize work discussions presented new model for lattice super yang - mills theorysusy invariant one - cell model extended space representation link variable @xmath39 real susy transformation fermi field embedding pattern one - cell model allows modulo 2 translational invariance embedding spinor structure lattice forthcoming paper @xcite discussions. curci veneziano nucl.phys . b292 ( 1987 ) 555 montvay nucl 63 ( 1998 ) 108 taniguchi d63 ( 2001 ) 014502 aratyn goto zimerman a88 ( 1985 ) 225 aratyn zimerman j.phys.a18 ( 1985 ) l487 kaplan schmaltz 38 ( 2000 ) 543 fleming. kogut vranas d64 ( 2001 ) 034510 itoh kato sawanaka ukita preparation | 0.270849 | 1,674 | 839 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,994 | nuclear reaction data play an important role in nuclear reactor , medical , and fundamental science and national security applications .
the wealth of information is stored in internally adopted endf-6 and exfor formats .
we present a complete calculation of resonance integrals , westcott factors , thermal and maxwellian - averaged cross sections for z=1 - 100 using evaluated nuclear reaction data .
the addition of newly - evaluated neutron reaction libraries , and improvements in data processing techniques allows us to calculate nuclear industry and astrophysics parameters , and provide additional insights on all currently available neutron - induced reaction data .
nuclear reaction calculations will be discussed and an overview of the latest reaction data developments will be given . | the value of compilation , evaluation and computer storage of neutron cross section data was first recognized in the early 50 s @xcite prompted by the urgent needs of nuclear industry .
these cross sections were summarized in bnl-325 report and evaluated nuclear data file ( endf ) library @xcite . over the years
, the nuclear data activities were extended to all low- and intermediate - energy nuclear physics topics .
computer storage and worldwide dissemination of nuclear data strongly depend on the presently available computer technologies @xcite and data format developments . in present days ,
size and representation of nuclear data files are no longer limited by the computer hardware and software . however , for historic and consistency reasons , nuclear data are still stored in 80-character long formats . for years , nuclear data research and developments were driven by nuclear science and technology applications .
these developments evolved and lead to the creation of complementary products such as experimental nuclear reaction data ( exfor ) database @xcite .
the overall nuclear data improvements , maturation and modern computer technologies created many new opportunities for nuclear reaction calculations , data mining and analysis . for the capture @xmath0-ray spectroscopy purposes
, we will concentrate on the selected nuclear astrophysics and reactor operation integral quantities that can be extracted from the beta version of endf / b - vii.1@xmath13 library .
current results will be finalized by the end of this year during the public release of endf / b - vii.1 library @xcite . 3 thermal neutron capture cross sections . ]
neutron capture cross sections govern the production of chemical elements in the agb and red giant stars , safe operation of nuclear reactors , serve in nuclear structure measurements , etc .
the low - energy neutron cross section values are often influenced by the contributions from resolved and unresolved resonance regions . to estimate these contributions across the whole endf / b - vii.1 library range of nuclei @xcite and provide additional insights on the data quality for nuclear reactor and astrophysics applications ,
we have selected thermal and maxwellian - averaged cross sections , resonance integrals and westcott factors @xcite for calculation and further analysis .
endf / b - vii.0 @xcite and endf / b - vii.1@xmath13 evaluated neutron cross sections were doppler broadened using the code prepro @xcite with the precision of 0.1% .
these reconstructed and linearized data were used to calculate the selected quantities using the definite java integration method @xcite . the ratio of thermal @xmath2(n,@xmath0 )
is shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] . using the method of visual inspection we notice the deviations for light and medium nuclei and minor actinides evaluations .
these differences , in the low- and medium - z region , are attributed to the lack of or insufficient experimental data for @xmath3b , @xmath4o , @xmath5ca , @xmath6kr , @xmath7pd , deficiencies for @xmath8co,@xmath9mo and recent re - evaluation of @xmath10zr . while , in the actinide region , deviations are due to new evaluations from the actinoid file @xcite .
neutron capture resonance integrals were calculated for 0.5 ev - 20 mev incident neutron energy range and shown in fig .
[ iq.3 ] .
3 thermal neutron capture resonance integrals . ]
several data outliers in this case could be traced to the lack of measurements and incomplete overlap of experimental and theoretical data for @xmath4o , @xmath11ru , @xmath12ho and @xmath13ca , @xmath8co , @xmath14cs , @xmath15hg , respectively .
however , there are neutron capture cross section deficiencies in the kev region of energies for @xmath16o,@xmath17si and @xmath18pb evaluations . maxwellian - averaged cross sections play an important role in power reactor developments and slow - neutron capture ( _ s_-process ) nucleosynthesis calculations @xcite .
the @xmath19-process is mostly responsible for element formation in stars from @xmath20fe to @xmath21bi .
the detailed analysis of the fig .
[ iq.5 ] data @xcite demonstrates the nuclear astrophysics potential of endf libraries as a complimentary source of evaluated cross sections and reaction rates . 3 maxwellian - averaged cross sections at _ kt_=30 kev . ]
there are noticeable differences between kadonis @xcite and endf / b - vii.1@xmath13 libraries for light and medium nuclei .
@xmath22h deviation is due to differences between center of mass and lab system cross section values . for @xmath23si , @xmath24p , @xmath25ni and @xmath26hg kadonis values
are based on a single recent measurement . due to lack of experimental data theoretical values
were adopted for @xmath27ar , @xmath28se , @xmath29cd , @xmath30ce , @xmath31pr and @xmath32pm .
deficiencies in @xmath16o , @xmath33ca and @xmath34s originate from the old or insignificant for integral tests endf evaluations and coverage problems in exfor database @xcite , respectively . shown in fig .
[ iq.6 ] ratio of capture westcott factors indicate large deviations for @xmath35u and @xmath36lu . 3 libraries .
] these deviations reflect the changes in endf / b - vii.1@xmath13 library where westcott factors evolved from 3.997 to 0.989 and from 1.002 to 1.711 for @xmath35u and @xmath36lu , respectively .
the last number agrees well with the recommended value of 1.75 @xcite .
smaller deviations as in @xmath37xe are due to adoption of new evaluations in endf / b - vii.1@xmath13 library and lack of experimental data for this nucleus .
the present work demonstrates large potential of endf libraries for capture @xmath0-ray spectroscopy applications .
maxwellian - averaged and thermal capture cross sections , resonance integrals and westcott factors have been extracted from the beta version of endf / b - vii.1@xmath13 library .
these results are important in fundamental science , nuclear technologies and for nuclear data validation .
several @xmath1-version @xmath2(n,@xmath0 ) deficiencies ( @xmath16o , @xmath8co , ... ) will be resolved during the official library release . the new endf / b - vii.1 library @xcite will be publicly available in december of 2011 at the national nuclear data center website _ http://www.nndc.bnl.gov _
future nuclear reaction data mining work will involve extensive analysis of neutron cross section covariance files and extended coverage for neutron capture , fission and elastic scattering and all major neutron libraries .
the author is grateful to m. herman , s.f .
mughabghab and m. blennau ( bnl ) for support of this work , productive discussions and careful reading of the manuscript and useful suggestions , respectively .
this work is supported by the office of nuclear physics , office of science of the u.s .
department of energy , under contract no .
de - ac02 - 98ch10886 with brookhaven science associates , llc .
20 s. pearlstein , nuclear news , 73 no .
11 november ( 1970 ) .
mughabghab , atlas of neutron resonances , resonance parameters and neutron cross sections z = 1 - 100 , elsevier ( 2006 ) . m.b .
chadwick , p. obloinsk ' y , m.w .
_ , nuclear data sheets * 107 * , 2931 ( 2006 ) .
b. pritychenko , a.a .
sonzogni , d.f .
et al . _ ,
energy * 33 * , 390 ( 2006 ) .
international network of nuclear reaction data centres ( nrdc ) , compilation of experimental nuclear reaction data ( exfor / csisrs ) , ( available from _
_ h__ttp://www - nds.iaea.org / exfor/ , http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/exfor/ ) .
chadwick , m.w .
herman , p. obloinsk ' y _ et al .
_ , nuclear data sheets * 112 * , no.12 ( 2011 ) .
b. pritychenko , s.f .
mughabghab , and a.a .
sonzogni , atomic data and nuclear data tables * 96 * , 645 ( 2010 ) .
cullen , the endf / b pre - processing codes ( prepro ) , " available from @xmath38http://www - nds.iaea.org/ ndspub / endf / prepro/@xmath39
. b. pritychenko , proc .
nuclei in cosmos , pos(nic - xi)197 , heidelberg , germany , july 19 - 23 ( 2010 ) .
o. iwamoto , t. nakagawa , n. otuka _
_ , nuclear data sheets * 109 * , 2885 ( 2008 ) .
bao , h. beer , f. kppeler _ et al .
_ , atomic data and nuclear data tables * 76 * , 70 ( 2000 ) . i. dillmann , m. heil , f. kppeler _
et al . _ , aip conf
. proc . * 819 * , 123 ( 2006 ) ; data downloaded from @xmath38http://www.kadonis.org@xmath39 on april 14 , 2011 .
mughabghab , m. divadeenam , and n. holden , _ neutron cross sections _ , vol . * 1 * , part a , academic press , new york ( 1981 ) . k. shibata , o. iwamoto , t. nakagawa _
et al . _ ,
* 48 * , 1 ( 2011 ) . | value of compilation evaluation computer storage neutron cross section data recognized early 50 s needs nuclear industry cross sections summarized in bnl-325 report evaluated nuclear data file library nuclear data activities extended to low intermediate - energy nuclear topics computer storage dissemination nuclear data depend on computer technologies data format developments size representation nuclear data files limited by computer hardware software nuclear data stored in 80-character formats nuclear data research developments driven by nuclear science technology applications experimental nuclear reaction data database nuclear data improvements modern computer technologies created opportunities for nuclear reaction calculations data mining analysis concentrate on nuclear astrophysics reactor operation integral quantities from beta version endf / b - vii.1 library results finalized end year public release endf b - vii.1 library thermal neutron capture cross sections govern production chemical elements safe operation nuclear reactors nuclear structure measurements low - energy neutron cross section values influenced by contributions from resolved unresolved resonance regions estimate contributionslibrary range nuclei insights data quality nuclear reactor astrophysics applications selected thermal maxwellian - averaged cross sections resonance integrals westcott factors for calculation analysis endf b - vii.0.1@xmath13 evaluated neutron cross sections doppler broadened code prepro precision 0.1% reconstructed linearized data calculate quantities java integration method ratio thermal @xmath2(n@xmath0 shown . deviations light medium nuclei minor actinides evaluations differences low- medium - z region attributed lack insufficient experimental data @xmath3b @xmath4o @xmath7pd deficiencies @xmath8co@xmath9mo re - evaluation @xmath10zr actinide region deviations due new evaluations actinoid file neutron capture resonance integrals calculated 0.5 ev - 20 mev neutron energy range fig . neutron capture resonance integrals data outliers lack of measurements incomplete overlap experimental theoretical data @xmath4o @xmath11runeutron capture cross section deficiencies in kev @xmath16o evaluations maxwellian - averaged cross sections power reactor developments slow - neutron capture nucleosynthesis calculations @xmath19-process for element formation stars @xmath20fe to.5 data nuclear astrophysics potential endf libraries cross sections reaction rates 3 maxwellian - averaged cross sections at=30 kev noticeable differences between kadonis @xcite endf -.1@xmath13 libraries for light medium nuclei @xmath22h deviation due to differences center of mass lab system cross section values kadonis values based on single recent measurement lack experimental data theoretical values adopted for deficiencies in @xmath16o originate from old tests evaluations coverage problems in exfor database @xcite capture westcott factors large deviations for @xmath35u @xmath36lu deviations reflect changes in endf b - vii.1@xmath13 library westcott factors evolved from 3.997 to 0.989 1.002 to 1.711 forlast number agrees with recommended value 1.75 @xcite deviations @xmath37xe due to new evaluations -.1@xmath13 library lack of experimental data work demonstrates potential endf libraries for @xmath0-ray spectroscopy applications maxwellian - averaged thermal capture cross sections resonance integrals westcott factors extracted from beta version -@xmath13 library results important in fundamental science nuclear technologies nuclear data validation @xmath1-version @xmath2 deficiencies resolved during official library release new endf b - vii.1 library @xcite available december 2011 national nuclear data center website future nuclear reaction data mining analysis neutron cross section covariance files coverage for neutron capture fission elastic scattering major neutron libraries author grateful to m. herman mughabghab m. blennau for support discussions suggestions supported by office of nuclear office science u.s . department of energy contract - - 98ch10886 with brookhaven science associates pearlstein nuclear news 73 november atlas neutron resonances parameters cross sections 2006nuclear data sheets 107 2931 ( 2006 ) pritychenko sonzogni d.f . energy 33 390 ( 2006 ) international network nuclear reaction data centres experimental nuclear reaction data exfor available nds.iaea.org exfor.nndc.bnl.gov chadwick herman obloinsk nuclear data sheets 112 no.12 ( 2011 ) pritychenko mughabghab sonzogni atomic data nuclear data tables 96 645 ( 2010 ) cullen endf pre - processing codes nds.iaea.org endf prepro pritychenko nuclei cosmos)197 heidelberg germany july 19 - 23 ( 2010 ) o. iwamoto t. nakagawa n. otuka nuclear data sheets 109 2885 ( 2008 ) bao . beer f. kppeler atomic data nuclear data tables 76 70 ( 2000 ) dillmann m. heil f. kppeler conf proc 819 123 ( 2006 ) data downloaded from april 14 2011 mughabghab m. divadeenamholden neutron cross sections vol 1 part academic press new york 1981 ) shibata iwamoto nakagawa al 48 * 1 2011 ) | 0.350148 | 2,212 | 1,068 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,996 | the effect of alkaline earth substitution on structural parameters was studied in high - quality single crystals of ba@xmath0sr@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 and sr@xmath0ca@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2grown by the self - flux method .
the results of single - crystal and powder x - ray diffraction measurements suggest a continuous monotonic decrease of both @xmath3- and @xmath4-axis lattice parameters , the @xmath5 tetragonal ratio , and the unit cell volume with decreasing alkaline earth atomic radius as expected by vegard s law . as a result ,
the system experiences a continuously increasing chemical pressure effect in traversing the phase diagram from @xmath6 in ba@xmath0sr@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 to @xmath7 in sr@xmath0ca@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 .
the recent discovery of high - temperature superconductivity in iron - based compounds has attracted much interest .
the parent phases of these compounds generally show antiferromagnetic order that onsets between 130 k and 200 k , with superconductivity emerging when the antiferromagnetic order of the parent compounds is suppressed @xcite .
this proximity of magnetic and superconducting order parameters is widely thought to be a key argument for an unconventional pairing mechanism , likely mediated by spin fluctuations @xcite similar to the cuprates @xcite .
but in strong contrast to the copper oxides , superconductivity in iron arsenides can be induced without changing the carrier concentration , either by applying external pressure @xcite or by isovalent chemical substitution .
the highest @xmath8 achieved so far in these materials is @xmath9 k in smo@xmath0f@xmath1feas @xcite and ( sr , ca)feasf @xcite .
oxygen - free feas - based compounds with the thcr@xmath2si@xmath2-type ( 122 ) structure also exhibit superconductivity induced by chemical substitution of alkali or transition metal ions @xcite , the application of large pressures @xcite , or lattice strain @xcite , with transition temperatures as high as @xmath10 k. for the 122 phase , superconductivity has been induced by substituting fe with not only 3@xmath11-transition metals such as co and ni , but also some of the 4@xmath11- and 5@xmath11-transition metals .
recently , ru , ir , and pt substitution for fe were also shown to induce superconductivity in srfe@xmath2as@xmath2 and bafe@xmath2as@xmath2 @xcite .
superconductivity with @xmath8@xmath12 31 k has also been shown to occur by isovalent substitution of p for as @xcite .
this gives the opportunity to tune magnetic character without nominally changing charge carrier concentrations , for instance making the interpretation of transport coefficients much simpler than in the case of charge doping . in order to investigate the possibility of applying uniform chemical pressure in a continuous manner ,
we have synthesized the series of solid solutions ba@xmath0sr@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 and sr@xmath0ca@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2by substituting isovalent alkaline earth atoms , and investigated the evolution of the crystal structure by high - resolution powder and single - crystal x - ray diffraction . here
we present our preliminary results that suggest the unit cell of the ba - sr - ca substitution series experiences a monotonic uniform chemical pressure as a function of alkaline earth atomic radius .
single - crystal samples of ba@xmath0sr@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 and sr@xmath0ca@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 were grown using the feas self - flux method @xcite .
fe was first separately pre - reacted with as via solid - state reaction of fe ( 99.999% ) powder with as ( 99.99% ) powders in a quartz tube of partial atmospheric pressure of ar .
the precursor materials were mixed with elemental sr ( 99.95% ) with either ba ( 99.95% ) or ca ( 99.95% ) in the ratio 4:1@xmath13 , placed in an alumina crucible and sealed in a quartz tube under partial ar pressure .
the mixture was heated to 1150@xmath14c , slow - cooled to a lower temperature and then quenched to room temperature .
typical dimensions of as - grown single crystal specimen are @xmath12100 @xmath15 m thickness and up to 5 mm width . chemical analysis was performed using both energy- and wavelength - dispersive x - ray spectroscopy ( eds and wds ) .
both eds and wds analysis of all ba@xmath0sr@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 and sr@xmath0ca@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 samples showed the proper 1:2:2 stoichiometry in all specimens reported herein , with no indication of impurity phases .
figure [ fig1 ] compares the nominal alkaline earth concentration @xmath16 in sr@xmath0ca@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 crystals with that measured by wds and eds analysis , using an average value determined from 8 different spots on each specimen . as shown by the dotted line guide ,
the actual concentrations found by wds are equal to the nominal values of @xmath16 to within experimental error , indicating homogeneous substitution in this series of solid solutions .
diffraction patterns were obtained by both powder and single - crystal x - ray diffraction and rietfeld refinement ( shelxs-97 ) to @xmath17 structure .
powder x - ray diffraction was performed at 250 k using a smart apex2 diffractometer with mo - k@xmath18 radiation and a graphite monochromator .
figure [ fig2 ] shows a typical x - ray diffraction pattern obtained from a single - crystal sample of sr@xmath19ca@xmath20fe@xmath2as@xmath2 .
all of the main peaks can be indexed to the thcr@xmath2si@xmath2 structure , with no impurity phases detected .
.[tabl1]crystallographic data for srfe@xmath2as@xmath2 and sr@xmath21ca@xmath22fe@xmath2as@xmath2determined by single - crystal x - ray diffraction at 250 k. the structure was solved and refined using the shelxs-97 software , yielding lattice constants with residual factor @xmath23= 1.36% and 1.95% for srfe@xmath2as@xmath2 and sr@xmath21ca@xmath22fe@xmath2as@xmath2 , respectively . [ cols="<,<,<",options="header " , ] table 1 shows the crystallographic parameters determined by single - crystal x - ray - diffraction at 250 k in sr@xmath19ca@xmath20fe@xmath2as@xmath2 .
a bruker smart apex2 diffractometer with mo - k@xmath18 radiation , a graphite monochromator with monocarp collimator , and a ccd area detector were used for this experiment .
the structure was refined with shelxl-97 software using 1033 measured reflections of which 115 were unique and 108 observed .
the final residuals were @xmath24= 1.36% and 1.96% for the observed data and @xmath25= 3.31% and 4.52% for all data for srfe@xmath2as@xmath2 and sr@xmath19ca@xmath20fe@xmath2as@xmath2 respectively . sr and ca atoms were found to reside in the same site with a refined ca : sr ratio of 0.33(1):0.67(1 ) , giving the exact formula sr@xmath21ca@xmath22fe@xmath2as@xmath2 from x - ray analysis .
figure [ fig3 ] shows the unit cell of sr@xmath21ca@xmath22fe@xmath2as@xmath2 determined by single crystal x - ray diffraction at 250 k. the size of the ellipsoids map the thermal agitation of the particular ion at 250 k with a 50% probability factor , which means the probability of finding the center of the atom inside the ellipsoid .
figure [ fig4]presents the variation of the @xmath3- and @xmath4-axis lattice constants ( upper panel ) , the unit cell volume and the tetragonal @xmath5 ratio ( lower panel ) with ba - sr and sr - ca concentrations determined from refinements of the single crystal x - ray diffraction data for ba@xmath0sr@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 and sr@xmath0ca@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 crystals taken at 250 k. within experimental accuracy , the @xmath3- and @xmath4-axis lattice constants , the @xmath5 ratio , and the unit cell volume all show a monotonic linear decrease with alkaline earth substitution in the continuous series from bafe@xmath2as@xmath2 to srfe@xmath2as@xmath2 to cafe@xmath2as@xmath2 .
this fact indicates that the whole ( ba , sr , ca)fe@xmath2as@xmath2 series progression experiences a uniform chemical pressure effect due to the reduction of the cation size that follows vegard s law , as expected for the decreasing ionic radii of ba , sr and ca , respectively . the lattice parameters of ba@xmath0sr@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 obtained in our experiments are consistent with the data reported in a recent study @xcite , which found a systematic increase of @xmath26 with increasing sr content and no superconductivity . on the other hand , substitution of arsenic for the smaller phosphorus atoms ,
also instituting a chemical pressure effect , induces superconductivity in bafe@xmath2as@xmath27p@xmath1 @xcite .
thus , a pressure - volume effect is clearly an oversimplified explanation for superconductivity in bafe@xmath2as@xmath27p@xmath1 . in the future
, it will be interesting to investigate the evolution of superconductivity combining both the chemical pressure effect of alkaline earth substitution studied here and another tuning parameter that induces superconductivity in order to investigate the role of lattice density in these phenomena . in summary ,
we have systematically studied the crystallographic properties in the solid solution series ba@xmath0sr@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 and sr@xmath0ca@xmath1fe@xmath2as@xmath2 by growing high - quality single crystals by the self - flux method .
x - ray diffraction and data refinement reveal that the entire ( ba , sr , ca)fe@xmath2as@xmath2series progresses according to vegard s law , experiencing a uniform chemical pressure effect due to substitution with reduced ionic size from ba to sr to ca , respectively . | the authors acknowledge b. w. eichhorn for experimental assistance , and n.p.b . acknowledges support from a cnam glover fellowship .
this work was supported by afosr - muri grant fa9550 - 09 - 1 - 0603 . | authors acknowledge eichhorn experimental assistance support cnam glover fellowship work supported - muri grant fa9550 09 0603 | 0.065709 | 58 | 27 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,998 | data on the observation of neutron bursts in the process of high - voltage discharge in the air at an average electric field strength @xmath0 mv@xmath1m@xmath2 and discharge current @xmath3 ka are presented .
two independent methods ( cr-39 track detectors and plastic scintillation detectors ) registered neutrons within the range from thermal energies up to the energies above 10 mev with the flux of @xmath4 neutrons per shot into @xmath5 solid angle . | nowadays , the evidence of neutron flux enhancement in the lightning discharges in the atmosphere have been obtained in a number of experiments @xcite . in the period of thunderstorm activity a significant excess of the neutron flux over the cosmic background
is observed , and the registered neutron energy is in the range from the thermal ( 0.01 ev ) to the fast one ( tens of mev ) .
the nuclear fusion processes @xmath6h(@xmath6h , n)@xmath7he in the lightning channel @xcite , the reaction @xmath8c(@xmath6h , n)@xmath9n , @xmath10n(@xmath6h , n)@xmath11o @xcite and the photonuclear ( @xmath12,n ) reactions have been considered @xcite as possible mechanisms , leading to the formation of a statistically significant gain of a neutron flux in a thunderstorm atmosphere .
however , a satisfactory explanation of the aggregate of the existing experimental results is still lacking . in this connection , the experiments on studying the neutron emission in the laboratory conditions , in high - voltage discharges in the air , which are similar to conditions observed in a natural storm , seem to be important .
the experiments have been carried out with a high current electron beam accelerator erg , reconstructed for studying the high - voltage discharge in the air @xcite .
the scheme of the experiment is shown in fig .
[ fig:1]a .
the voltage amplitude up to 1 mw from the marx - generator with the store energy of 60 kj is fed through the entranced oil - air isolator at to duralumin flange with replaceable electrodes ( cathode ) , and provides discharge current of @xmath13 ka in the air .
the diameter of the external grounded cylindrical conductor limits the allowable distance between the cathode and the anode at the level of 1 m. the anode flange can be moved along the axis of the system for a smooth change of the gap . the anodes and cathodes used the same set of replaceable electrodes . the scheme of laboratory experiment .
( a ) layout of diagnostics : 1 , 2 - capacitive and active dividers , 3 - high voltage input from marx - generator , 4 , 13 - magnetic probes , 5 - track detectors , 6 - anode shunt , 7 - rogowski coil , 8,9 - integral cameras , 10 - scintillation detectors , 11 - uv radiation detector , 12 - pmt to visible light , 14 - cathode , 15 - anode .
( b ) layout of cr-39 track detectors : 1 - inside the anode , 2 - inside the cathode , 3 , 4 , 5 - axially placed in water , 6 , 7 , 8 - radially placed at different distances from the discharge . ]
electrophysical diagnostics included the recording of currents waveforms ( anode shunt , rogowski coils ) , the voltage ( active and capacitive divider ) , and azimuthal magnetic field probes with a bandwidth of 200 mhz .
the channel formation of the discharge is monitored using integral shooting in the optical range from two angles . to register the integral neutron flux
the track detectors cr-39 , produced by fukuvi chemical industry company , which are insensitive to the electromagnetic radiation , have been used .
the track detectors cr-39 are located near the zone of discharge as shown in fig .
[ fig:1]b .
the calibration of the cr-39 detector by charged particles has been carried out on the beam of protons from an electrostatic accelerator ( e@xmath14 mev ) , with standard @xmath15-sources ( e@xmath16 mev ) , and on the beam of a cyclotron ( e@xmath17 mev ) at sinp msu .
after the irradiation the detectors were etched in the solution 6 m naoh in h@xmath18o at the temperature of 70c during 7 hours . a detailed procedure of the track detector calibration is considered in @xcite .
the neutron calibration of the cr-39 detector was performed using a @xmath19cf source with the activity of @xmath20 n@xmath1s@xmath2 in the solid angle of 4@xmath21 . a detector with the radiator of 120 @xmath22 m polyethylene ( detectors pe in fig . [ fig:1 ] ) was used .
recoil protons produced by fast neutrons are registered by track detector .
the calibration measurements have shown that the diameters of the proton tracks are in the range of @xmath23 @xmath22 m .
the average efficiency of fast neutron registration by cr-39 detector was @xmath24 .
for the registration of thermal neutrons by the reaction @xmath25 the detectors were placed into the 20@xmath26 solution of na@xmath18b@xmath27o@xmath28 in glycerol ( detectors with b in fig .
[ fig:1 ] ) .
the neutrons were registered by counting the tracks of @xmath15-particles with e@xmath29 2 mev , which , according to the calibration , have the diameters of @xmath30 @xmath22 m .
the average efficiency of thermal neutron registration by cr-39 detector was @xmath31 .
fast neutrons of the energy e@xmath32 mev was detected by the reaction of @xmath33 with the energy threshold of about 10 mev .
a characteristic signature of the desintegration of the nucleus @xmath8c presents three @xmath15-particles , and their tracks come from a single point .
the average efficiency of registration of the fast neutrons by reaction ( [ eq2 ] ) using the cr-39 detector with a 120 @xmath22 m pe radiator was @xmath34 @xcite .
the registration of neutron emission in the real - time mode was performed by plastic scintillation detectors . for the detection of fast neutrons and x - rays popop
doped polystyrene scintillators were used .
the scintillators have an active area of @xmath35 cm@xmath6 and the thickness of 5.5 cm .
signals were registered by 4-channel digital storage osciloscope with 1 ghz bandwidth .
the intrinsic efficiency of the detector to fast neutrons , measured with the @xmath19cf source , was equal to @xmath37 .
in a series of 180 shots the cr-39 track detectors , placed inside spherical anode and cathode , showed the excess of neutron flux over background .
the track diameter distributions for the charged particles in the detectors are shown in fig .
[ fig:2 ] .
the round - shaped tracks with an angle of incidence close to the normal have been chosen .
the cr-39 detector with pe radiator of 120 @xmath22 m , placed inside the anode , revealed @xmath385 time excess of tracks above the background within the range of recoil proton diameters of @xmath39 @xmath22 m ( fig . [ fig:2]a ) .
this excess should correspond to the average fast neutron flux in the location of the detector @xmath40
n@xmath1@xmath41 per shot .
a similar detector , located inside the cathode , also showed the excess above the background in the same range ( fig .
[ fig:2]b ) .
the average flux of fast neutrons , estimated by the recoil protons , in the detector area was @xmath42 n@xmath1 @xmath41 per shot .
the detector inside the anode placed into a 20@xmath26 solution of na@xmath18b@xmath27o@xmath28 in glycerol , has also showed the excess above the background ( fig .
[ fig:2]c ) in @xmath30 @xmath22 m range of diameters of @xmath15-particle tracks ( e@xmath43 mev ) .
the average thermal neutron flux in the detector area , estimated by the reaction ( [ eq1 ] ) , was @xmath44 n@xmath1@xmath41 per shot .
significant excess above the background in the @xmath39 @xmath22 m range of the diameters of recoil proton tracks was also observed .
comparison of data from the detectors 1 and 3 has shown that the thermal neutron flux in the far detector ( see .
[ fig:2]d ) is greater . probably , the fast neutrons are primary in the discharge , and then they slow down in the water moderator up to thermal energies . very important result is connected with direct observation of desintegration of @xmath8c nucleus into 3 @xmath15-particles .
clear signature for such type events was observed on detectors located near discharge area .
for example , at the detector 1 ( 2 cm@xmath6 ) , placed near the anode , there were observed 10 events of the desintegration of @xmath8c nucleus into 3 @xmath15-particles ( fig .
[ fig:3 ] ) .
therefore the number of 3@xmath15-events was n@xmath45 @xmath41 at the background n@xmath46
@xmath41 , i.e. the confidence level of the effect of @xmath8c nucleus desintegration is more than 10 @xmath47 .
the average neutron flux of the energy e@xmath32 mev in the detector area , estimated by the reaction of ( [ eq2 ] ) , was @xmath48 n@xmath1@xmath41 per shot .
on the different detectors , located near the discharge , n@xmath49 @xmath41 .
the observation of neutron signals with plastic scintillation detectors is shown in fig .
[ fig:4]a .
the detectors are located at a distance of @xmath50 cm from the discharge zone .
one of detectors was shielded by 50 @xmath22 m al foil and could detect the pulses from the x - rays ( e@xmath51 10 kev ) and neutrons ( e@xmath52 1 mev ) .
the other one had an additional 10 cm thick pb shield . during a discharge
both detectors indicated the time structure of signals .
the start signal ( presumably , from fast neutrons ) in the second detector with the protection of 10 cm of pb was delayed relative to the first signal ( x - rays ) by 35 ns . using time - of - flight estimation
it was obtained the energy of neutron e@xmath53 mev .
taking into account the geometric factor ( @xmath54 ) and detection efficiency , fast fraction of neutron flux was estimated as @xmath55 into 4@xmath21 sr per shot .
an additional neutron moderator ( 20 cm of polyethylene ) leads to the absence of a signal from fast neutrons at the second detector .
this is in agreement with the assumption of fast neutrons emission . as seen from fig .
[ fig:4]b , the neutron bursts occur on the pre - pulse current prior to the formation of the discharge . at the moment of neutron generation
the pre - pulse current amplitude is @xmath56 times smaller then the amplitude of the main current pulse .
two independent methods ( track detector cr-39 and the detector on the basis of plastic scintillators with pmt ) have revealed that in the process of a high - voltage discharge in the air the neutrons are emitted in a wide energy range ( from thermal up to the energies greater than 10 mev ) with the intensity of @xmath57 neutrons per shot into 4@xmath21 solid angle .
the obtained data allows one to assume that during the discharge the fast neutrons are produced , and their generation occurs at the initial phase of the discharge and is correlated with the generation of x - ray radiation . to explain the mechanism of the observed emission of neutrons and clarify the location of their source
one needs additional experiments .
the authors express their gratitude to s.m .
zakharov , v.a .
bogachenkov and e.i .
saunin for assistance in conducting the experiments , a.v .
gurevich , s.s .
gershtein and g.a .
mesyats for helpful discussions .
the work was supported in part by the rfbr grant no .
13 - 08 - 01379 .
g. n. shah et al .
nature ( london ) 313 ( 1985 ) 773 .
gurevich et al .
prl 108 ( 2012 ) 125001 .
fleisher r.l .
j. gephys .
80 ( 1975 ) 5005 .
m. kuzhevskiy .
moscow univ .
phys . bull . 5 ( 2004 ) 14 , in russian .
fleisher et al
. j. gephys
79 ( 1974 ) 5013 .
geomagnetism and aeronomy 47 ( 2007 ) 702 .
a. v. agafonov , a. v. oginov , and k. v. shpakov , physics of particles and nuclei letters 9 ( 2012)380 .
belyaev et al .
physics of atomic nuclei 72 ( 2009 ) 1123 .
a.m. marenniy , n.a .
nefedov , a.s .
kratkie soobshenia po fizike fian , n 6 ( 1998 ) 42 , in russian . | evidence of neutron flux enhancement in lightning discharges obtained in experiments thunderstorm activity significant excess neutron flux over cosmic background observed registered neutron energy from thermal 0.01 ev to fast tens of mev ) nuclear fusion processes @xmath6h in lightning channel reaction @xmath8c photonuclear @xmath12,n ) reactions possible mechanisms leading to significant gain neutron flux in thunderstorm atmosphere satisfactory explanation of results lacking experiments studying neutron emission in laboratory conditions in high - voltage discharges similar to natural storm important experiments carried with high current electron beam accelerator erg for high - voltage discharge scheme experiment shown in fig :1]a voltage amplitude up to 1 mw from marx - generator store energy 60 kj fed through oil - air isolator duralumin flange with replaceable electrodes provides discharge current of @xmath13 ka in air conductor limits distance between cathode and anode at 1 m anode flange can moved along for smooth change of gapanodes cathodes used replaceable electrodes laboratory experiment layout diagnostics 1 2 capacitive active dividers 3 high voltage input marx - generator 4 13 - magnetic probes 5 - track detectors 6 - anode shunt 7 - rogowski coil 8,9 - integral cameras 10 - scintillation detectors 11 - uv radiation detector 12 - pmt visible light 14 - cathode 15 - anode layout cr-39 track detectors 1 - inside anode 2 - cathode 3 4 5 - axially placed in water 6 7 8 - radially different distances from discharge electrophysical diagnostics recording currents waveforms voltage divider azimuthal magnetic field probes bandwidth 200 mhz channel formation discharge monitored using integral shooting neutron flux track detectors cr-39 fukuvi chemical industry insensitive to electromagnetic radiation used near zone discharge calibration cr-39 detector by charged particles protons electrostatic accelerator standard-sources cyclotron after detectors etched in solution 6 m naoh h@xmath18o 70c 7 hourstrack detector calibration @xcite neutron calibration cr-39 detector @xmath19cf source activity @xmath20@xmath1s@xmath2 solid angle 4@xmath21 detector radiator 120 @xmath22 m polyethylene used recoil protons fast neutrons registered calibration measurements diameters proton tracks @xmath23 @xmath22 m average efficiency fast neutron registration @xmath24 registration thermal neutrons @xmath25 detectors 20@xmath26 solution na@xmath18b@xmath27o@xmath28 glycerol neutrons registered counting tracks @xmath15-particles e@xmath29 2 mev diameters @xmath30 @xmath22 m average efficiency thermal neutron registration @xmath31 fast neutrons energy e@xmath32 mev detected reaction @xmath33 energy threshold 10 mev characteristic signature desintegration nucleus @xmath8c three @xmath15-particles tracks single point average efficiency fast neutrons cr-39 detector 120 @xmath22 m radiator @xmath34 @xcite registration neutron emission real - plastic scintillation detectors detection fast neutrons x - rays popop doped polystyrene scintillators usedscintillators active area @xmath35 cm@xmath6 thickness 5.5 cm signals registered by 4-channel digital osciloscope 1 ghz bandwidth efficiency detector to fast neutrons equal to @xmath37 180 shots cr-39 track detectors anode cathode showed excess neutron flux over background track diameter distributions charged particles shown in fig:2 round - shaped tracks angle incidence close normal chosen cr-39 detector pe radiator 120 @xmath22 m inside anode revealed @xmath385 time excess tracks above background recoil proton diameters @xmath39 m excess average fast neutron flux @xmath40 n@xmath1@xmath41 per shot similar detector inside cathode showed excess above background average flux fast neutrons @xmath42 n @xmath41 per shot detector inside anode 20@xmath26 solution na@xmath18b@xmath27o@xmath28 in glycerol showed excess above background in @xmath30 @xmath22 m range diameters @xmath15-particle tracks average thermal neutron flux @xmath44 n@xmath1@xmath41 per shotexcess above background in @xmath39 @xmath22 m range recoil proton tracks observed comparison data detectors 1 3 thermal neutron flux in far detector greater fast neutrons primary in discharge slow down in water moderator thermal energies important result observation desintegration of @xmath8c nucleus into 3 @xmath15-particles signature events observed on detectors near discharge area detector 1 near anode observed 10 events desintegration @xmath8c nucleus into 3 @xmath15-particles number of 3@xmath15-events was@xmath45 @xmath41@xmath46 confidence level @xmath8c nucleus desintegration more than 10 @xmath47 average neutron flux mev in detector area was @xmath48 n@xmath41 per shot different detectors near discharge@xmath49 @xmath41 observation of neutron signals with plastic scintillation detectors shown in fig:4]a detectors @xmath50 cm from discharge zone one shielded by 50 @xmath22 m al foil x - rays neutrons 1 other 10 cm thick pb shielddischarge detectors indicated time structure signals start signal from fast neutrons second detector protection 10 cm pb delayed first signal by 35 ns time - of - flight estimation obtained energy neutron e@xmath53 mev geometric factor detection efficiency fast fraction neutron flux estimated as @xmath55 into 4@xmath21 sr per shot additional neutron moderator 20 cm polyethylene signal from fast neutrons second detector agreement with assumption fast neutrons emission neutron bursts occur on pre - pulse current prior formation discharge moment neutron generation pre - pulse current amplitude @xmath56 times smaller then main current pulse methods detector revealed high - voltage discharge neutrons emitted wide energy range thermal to 10 mev intensity of @xmath57 neutrons per shot into 4@xmath21 solid angle data discharge fast neutrons produced generation initial phase correlated with generation x - ray radiation explain mechanism emission neutrons clarify location source needs additional experiments authors gratitude to s zakharov bogachenkov saunin for assistance gurevich gershtein g mesyats for discussionswork supported rfbr grant 13 - 08 - 01379 shah nature london 313 ( 1985 ) 773 gurevich prl 108 2012 ) 125001 fleisher gephys 80 1975 ) 5005 kuzhevskiy moscow univ 5 2004 ) 14 russian fleisher gephys 79 1974 ) 5013 geomagnetism aeronomy 47 2007 ) 702 agafonov oginov shpakov physics particles nuclei 9 2012)380 belyaev atomic nuclei 72 2009 ) 1123 marenniy nefedov 6 1998 ) 42 russian | 0.439743 | 2,982 | 1,503 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,999 | the one - dimensional ginzburg - landau ( gl ) equation is considered . we use the recently developed extended f - expansion method to obtain spiral wave solution of one - dimensional gl equation . | the ginzburg - landau ( gl ) equation is one of the most - studied nonlinear partial differential equations ( pde ) @xcite .
spiral waves are important patterns in many systems , such as physics , chemistry , materials , biology , etc .
exploring exact solutions of nonlinear pde is a hot and difficult topic in mathematical physics .
many methods were developed for studying exact solutions of nonlinear pdes .
recently , a new method named extended f - expansion was proposed @xcite@xcite .
it s useful to obtain more jacobi elliptic function solutions . in this paper
it is used to study the one - dimensional gl equation .
we obtain a spiral wave solution , which is exactly same with hagan s solution @xcite .
the ginzburg - landau equation is given by @xmath0 where @xmath1 is a complex function of time @xmath2 and space @xmath3 ; @xmath4 and @xmath5 are real parameters describing linear and nonlinear dispersion , respectively .
it s useful to represent the complex function @xmath1 in the following way @xmath6 then the eq .
( [ glequ ] ) becomes @xmath7r - b(2\bigtriangledown\theta\cdot\bigtriangledown r + r\bigtriangleup\theta ) + ( 1 - r^2)r,\\ & r\partial_{t}\theta = b[\bigtriangleup - ( \bigtriangledown\theta)^2]r + 2\bigtriangledown\theta\cdot\bigtriangledown r + r\bigtriangleup\theta -cr^3 . \end{split}\ ] ] if @xmath8 , then it becomes a class of reaction - diffusion equations called @xmath9 systems which have the following general form @xmath7r + r\lambda(r),\\ & r\partial_{t}\theta= 2\bigtriangledown\theta\cdot\bigtriangledown r + r\bigtriangleup\theta + qr\omega(r).\label{rw } \end{split}\ ] ] for one - dimensional systems , let us assume the analogues of spiral wave solutions have the form @xmath10 where @xmath11 is an arbitrary constant and @xmath12 is a long - time scale @xcite .
substitution into eq .
( [ rw ] ) yields @xcite @xmath13 let us assume , @xmath14 where @xmath15 and @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) are constants to be determined later .
@xmath18 is a solution of the first - oder nonlinear ode @xmath19 according to the homogeneous balance method @xcite , we know @xmath20 , hence @xmath21 so we get the equations , @xmath22 by requiring the coefficients of each term @xmath23 in the third equation of eqs .
( [ gl1 ] ) are zero , we obtain , @xmath24 from the above equations we obtain @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 . then from the first two equations of eqs .
( [ gl1 ] ) we have @xmath28 finally , we obtain @xmath29 .[tab : paraf ] relations between the parameter@xmath30 and @xmath31 , where @xmath31 is satisfied with ode @xmath32 .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] according to the table [ tab : paraf ] , the only possible jacobi elliptic function which is satisfied with the eqs .
( [ s0s2s4 ] ) is @xmath33 with @xmath34 , i.e. @xmath35 @xcite .
so we obtain , @xmath36 so the spiral wave solution for the one - dimensional gl equation is @xmath37 so we finally get the one - dimensional gl equation s solution @xmath38}.\ ] ] this is the same as hagan s solution @xcite .
based on balance mechanism in nonlinear pdes , the extended f - expansion method is widely used to obtain single and combined non - degenerative jacobi elliptic function solutions , as well as their corresponding degenerative solutions , for many kinds of pdes .
as example , we give a spiral wave solution for the one - dimensional gl equation in this paper .
from this example we can see that the extended f - expansion method is a powerful tool in the nonlinear pde field .
we can expect that solutions of the higher dimensional gl equations also will be obtained in this way .
99 i. aranson , l. kramer , rev .
phys . , * 74 * ( 2002 ) , 99 j. liu , k. yang , chaos , solitons and fractals * 22 * ( 2004 ) 111 j. zhang , m. wang , y. wang , z. fang , phys .
lett . a * 350 * ( 2006 ) 103 hagan , p. s. , siam ( soc .
appl . math . )
42 ( 1982 ) , 762 | ginzburg - landau equation - studied nonlinear partial differential equations spiral waves important in systems physics chemistry materials biology exploring solutions nonlinear pde topic mathematical physics methods developed for studying solutions new method extended f - expansion proposed useful obtain jacobi elliptic function solutions study one - gl equation spiral wave solution same with hagan s solution ginzburg - landau equation given by @xmath0 @xmath1 complex function of time space @xmath3 real parameters describing linear nonlinear dispersion represent complex function @xmath1 eq becomes @xmath7r - b(2\bigtriangledown\theta r + r\theta ) + ( 1 - r^2)r\partial_\theta = b[\bigtriangleup -\theta^2]r + 2\theta + -cr^3 {split} @xmath8 becomes class reaction - diffusion equations @xmath9 systems form @xmath7r + r\lambda(r),\\ r\partial_{t}\theta= 2\bigtriangledown\theta r + r\bigtriangleup\theta + qr\omega(r).{split one - systems assume analogues spiral wave solutions form @xmath10 @xmath11 arbitrary constant @xmath12 long - time scale @xcite substitution eq yields @xcite @xmath13 assume @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 constants @xmath18 solution first - nonlinear ode @xmath19 homogeneous balance method @xmath20 @xmath21 equations @xmath22 requiring coefficients each term @xmath23 third equation eqs zero obtain @xmath24 equations obtain @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 first two equations @xmath28 obtain @xmath29 . relations between parameter@xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath31 satisfied with @xmath32 only possible jacobi elliptic function satisfied with eqs .s0s2s4 @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xcite obtain @xmath36 spiral wave solution one - dimensional gl equation @xmath37 equation solution @xmath38 same hagan s solution @xcite balance nonlinear pdes extended f - expansion method single combined non - degenerative jacobi elliptic function solutions degenerative solutions pdes spiral wave solution one - dimensional gl equation extended f - expansion method powerful nonlinear pde field solutions higher dimensional gl equations obtained. aranson l. kramer rev . 74 2002 ) j. liu k. yang chaos solitons fractals 22 2004 ) j. zhang . wang wang z fang phys . lett. 350 2006 ) hagan siam soc. appl math . 42 ( 1982 ) 762 | 0.183224 | 1,109 | 564 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
199,025 | in previous papers , we expressed the entanglement of formation in terms of conditional mutual information ( cmi ) . in this brief paper , we express the entanglement of distillation in terms of cmi . | entanglement of formation ( @xmath0 ) and entanglement of distillation ( @xmath1 ) were invented by bennett et al in ref.@xcite and satellite papers . in a series of previous papers@xcite
, we showed how to express @xmath0 in terms of conditional mutual information ( cmi ) , but we said nothing about @xmath1 . in this brief letter , we will show how to express @xmath1 in terms of cmi .
recently , other researchers have expressed some of their entanglement ideas in terms of unconditional mutual information .
see , for example , ref.@xcite .
two reasons why cmi is useful for quantifying entanglement are the following .
first , entanglement is an
exclusively quantum " effect .
cmi satisfies this requirement .
it vanishes in the classical regime , but not in the quantum regime , for a fiducial experiment .
second , entanglement is associated with a correlation between two events @xmath2 and @xmath3 .
but there must be something to distinguish entanglement correlations from classical correlations .
cmi satisfies this requirement too .
it measures more than just the correlation of @xmath2 and @xmath3 .
those two events are assumed to have a common ancestor event ( or cause , or antecedent ) in their past , call it @xmath4 , and we condition on that common ancestor .
( see fig.[fig : ent - form ] ) for example , in bohm s version of the epr experiment , @xmath4 might correspond to the event of a spin - zero particle breaking up into two spin - half particles with opposite spins .
we will try to make this paper as self contained as we can for such a short document .
if the reader has any questions concerning notation or definitions , we refer him to ref.@xcite a much longer , tutorial paper that uses the same notation as this paper .
we will represent random variables by underlined letters .
@xmath5 will be the set of all possible values that @xmath2 can assume , and @xmath6 will be the number of elements in @xmath5 .
@xmath7 will represent the cartesian product of sets @xmath5 and @xmath8 . in the quantum case
, @xmath9 will represent a hilbert space of dimension @xmath6 .
@xmath10 will represent the tensor product of @xmath9 and @xmath11 .
red indices should be summed over ( e.g. @xmath12 ) .
@xmath13 will denote the set of all probability distributions on @xmath5 , @xmath14 such that @xmath15 .
@xmath16 will denote the set of all density matrices acting on @xmath9 .
as usual@xcite , for any three random variables , @xmath17 , we define the _ mutual information_(mi ) by h ( : ) = h ( ) + h ( ) - h ( , ) , and the _ conditional mutual information_(cmi ) by h ( : | ) & = & h(| ) + h(| ) - h ( , | ) + & = & h ( ) -h ( , ) -h ( , ) + h ( , , ) .
since @xmath18 , one might be tempted to assume that also @xmath19 , but this is not generally true .
one can construct examples for which cmi is greater or smaller than mi , a fact well known since the early days of classical information theory@xcite , @xcite .
one can define analogous quantities for quantum physics .
suppose @xmath20 , with partial traces @xmath21 , etc .
then we define s ( : ) = s ( _ ) + s ( _ ) -s ( _ , ) , and s(:| ) = s ( _ ) -s ( _ , ) -s ( _ , ) + s ( _ , , ) .
before racing off at full speed , let s warm up with a brief review of the cmi definition of @xmath0 .
consider the classical bayesian net shown in fig.[fig : ent - form ] .
it represents a probability distribution of the form : p(a , b , ) = p(a| ) p(b | ) p ( ) .
[ eq : prob - ent - form]one can easily check that for this probability distribution , @xmath22 is identically zero . in the classical case , we define @xmath0 by e_f(p _ , ) = _ p _ , , k h ( : | ) , [ eq : clas - ent - form]where @xmath23 is the set of all probability distributions @xmath24 with a fixed marginal @xmath25 .
thus , @xmath0 is a function of @xmath25 . if @xmath23 contains a @xmath24 of the form given by eq.([eq : prob - ent - form ] ) , then @xmath26 .
this is always true if @xmath23 is defined to contain all probability distributions with arbitrary positive values of @xmath27 .
but it may not be true if @xmath23 contains only probability distributions with a fixed @xmath27 value .
the fact that the right hand side of eq.([eq : clas - ent - form ] ) vanishes in the classical case ( if @xmath23 includes all @xmath27 values ) is an important motivation for defining @xmath0 this way .
we want a measure of entanglement that is exclusively quantum .
in the quantum case , suppose @xmath28 is a probability distribution for @xmath29 , and @xmath30 is an orthonormal basis for @xmath31 .
for all @xmath32 , suppose @xmath33 , and @xmath34 .
consider a separable " density matrix @xmath35 of the form _ , , = _
[ eq : rho - ent - form]one can easily check that for this density matrix , @xmath36 . in the quantum case
, we define @xmath0 by e_f ( _ , ) = _ _ , , ks ( : | ) , [ eq : quan - ent - form]where @xmath23 equals the set @xmath37 arbitrary @xmath27 , fixed marginal @xmath38 .
thus , @xmath0 is a function of @xmath39 . if @xmath23 contains a @xmath35 of the form given by eq.([eq : rho - ent - form ] ) , then @xmath0 is zero .
the quantum @xmath0 can be nonzero even if @xmath23 contains all density matrices with arbitrary @xmath27 values . in eq.([eq :
quan - ent - form ] ) , we could set @xmath40 , where @xmath41 is the subset of @xmath42 which restricts @xmath35 to be of the form _ , , = _ w _ , where @xmath43 .
one can show that eq.([eq : quan - ent - form ] ) with @xmath40 is identical ( up to a factor of 2 ) to the definition of @xmath0 originally given by bennett et al in ref.@xcite .
other possible @xmath23 choices come to mind .
for example , one could set @xmath23 equal to @xmath44 , where @xmath44 is that subset of @xmath42 which restricts @xmath35 to be of the form _ , , = _
w _ , where @xmath45 need not be pure .
@xmath46 represent different degrees of information about how @xmath35 was created .
@xmath42 represents total ignorance .
in this section , we will define a classical @xmath1 . in the next section
, we will find a quantum counterpart for it . consider the classical bayesian net of fig.[fig : ent - dist ] .
the arrow from @xmath47 to @xmath48 allows what is often referred to as classical communication from alice to bob " .
let @xmath49 , @xmath50 .
let @xmath51 and @xmath52 . the net of fig.[fig : ent - dist ] satisfies : p(a , b , a , b ) = _ x , x p(a , a| a , a ) p(b , b |b , b , a , a ) p(x ) p(x ) , [ eq : prob - ent - dist]where [ eq : prob - sepa ] p(x ) = _ p(a|)p(b|)p ( ) , and p(x ) = _ p(a|)p(b|)p( ) .
we wish to consider only those experiment in which @xmath53 and @xmath54 are both fixed at a known value , call it 0 for definiteness . for such experiments ,
one considers : p(a , b | a=b=0 ) = .
henceforth we will use @xmath55 as a short - hand for the string @xmath56 " .
we will also use @xmath57 to denote @xmath58 and @xmath59 to denote @xmath60 . in the classical case
, we define @xmath1 by e_d(p _ , p_ ) = _ u , v _ p _ , , | k h ( : | , ) , where @xmath23 is the set of all probability distributions @xmath61 with a fixed marginal @xmath62 that satisfies eq.([eq : prob - ent - dist ] ) .
@xmath62 depends on @xmath63 . since we maximize over @xmath64
, @xmath1 is a function of @xmath65 and @xmath66 .
next we will show that the net of fig.[fig : ent - dist ] , * without the classical communication arrow * , satisfies : e_d(p _ , p_)e_f(p _ ) + e_f(p_ ) .
[ eq : ed - lt - ef]suppose we could show that h ( : | , , )
h ( ( , ) : ( , )| , ) .
[ eq : cmis - goal]after taking limits on the left hand side , this gives e_d h ( , : , | , ) .
[ eq : cmis - left]note that by the independence of the prime and unprimed variables h ( , : , | , ) = h(:| ) + h(:| ) .
[ eq : cmis - right]eqs.([eq : cmis - left ] ) and ( [ eq : cmis - right ] ) imply eq.([eq : ed - lt - ef ] ) .
so let us concentrate on establishing eq.([eq : cmis - goal ] ) .
events @xmath67 all occur before @xmath55 so they are independent of @xmath55 . therefore , we can write : h ( , : , | , ) = h ( , : , | , , ) .
[ eq : gamma - indep]because of eq.([eq : gamma - indep ] ) , eqs.([eq : cmis - goal ] ) is equivalent to : h ( : | , , )
h ( , : , | , , ) .
[ eq : cmis - goal2]eq.([eq : cmis - goal2 ] ) follows easily from the following lemma , which is proven in appendix[app : dpis ] .
lemma : the net of fig.[fig : data - pro ] satisfies h ( : | ) h ( : | ) . [ eq : dat - pro - cmi ]
in this section , we will give a quantum counterpart of the classical @xmath1 defined in the previous section .
as in the classical case , let @xmath49 , @xmath50 .
let @xmath51 and @xmath52 .
suppose @xmath68 and @xmath69 are given .
suppose @xmath70 is a unitary transformation mapping @xmath71 onto @xmath72 : u^ _ , | , u _
, | , = 1 .
likewise , suppose that for each @xmath73 , @xmath74is a unitary transformation mapping @xmath75 onto @xmath76 : v^a _ , | , v _ , | , ^a = 1 .
define the following projector on @xmath9 : _ ^a= _ _ . now consider the following density matrix _ , | = _ a _
^a u _ , | , v _ , | , ^a _ _ v^a _ , | , u^ _ , | , _
^a , [ eq : rho1-ent - dist]where @xmath77 is defined so that @xmath78 .
the previous equation can also be expressed in index notation as : & = & + & & + & & + & & + & & + & & .
finally , we define @xmath1 by e_d ( _ , _ ) = _ u , v _ _ , , |k s ( : | , ) , [ eq : quan - ent - dist]where @xmath23 contains all density matrices @xmath79 with a fixed marginal @xmath80 that satisfies eq.([eq : rho1-ent - dist ] ) .
in this appendix , we will prove two well known data processing inequalities .
[ lemma : dpi - re ] ( data processing inequality for relative entropy , see ref.@xcite ) if @xmath81 and @xmath84 is a matrix of non - negative numbers such that @xmath85 , then d(p//q)d(tp//tq ) , where @xmath86 should be understood as the matrix product of the column vector @xmath82 times the matrix @xmath87 . for any two random variables
@xmath88 , let @xmath89 be shorthand for @xmath90 . in other words , @xmath91 for all @xmath92 .
the two cmi we are dealing with can be rewritten in terms of relative entropy as follows : h ( : | ) = _ p ( ) d ( q^ _ , //
q^_q^ _ ) , and h ( : | ) = _ p ( ) d ( q^ _ , // q^_q^ _ ) . thus , if we can show that d ( q^ _ , //
q^_q^ _ ) d ( q^ _ , //
q^_q^ _ ) , then the present lemma will be proven .
the last inequality will follow from lemma [ lemma : dpi - re ] if we can find a transition probability matrix @xmath93 such that * r.r .
tucci , quantum entanglement and conditional information transmission " , quant - ph/9909041 * r.r .
tucci , separability of density matrices and conditional information transmission " , quant - ph/0005119 * r.r .
tucci , entanglement of formation and conditional information transmission " , quant - ph/0010041 * r.r .
relaxation method for calculating quantum entanglement " , quant - ph/0101123 * r.r .
tucci , entanglement of bell mixtures of two qubits " , quant - ph/0103040 this data processing inequality for relative entropy is well known .
ref.@xcite mentions it on page 300 .
our proof of the inequality comes from page 55 of the book by i. csiszar and j. korner , information theory - coding theorems for discrete memoryless systems " , ( academic press , 1981 ) . | entanglement of formation @xmath0 distillation @xmath1 invented by bennett et al in ref.@xcite satellite papers previous papers showed express @xmath0 conditional mutual information cmi about @xmath1 this brief letter express @xmath1 cmi other researchers expressed entanglement ideas unconditional mutual information see ref.@xcite two reasons cmi useful for quantifying entanglement entanglement exclusively quantum effect cmi satisfies requirement vanishes in classical regime not quantum regime for fiducial experiment entanglement associated with correlation between events @xmath2 @xmath3 distinguish entanglement correlations from classical correlations cmi satisfies measures more than correlation events assumed common ancestor event @xmath4 condition on common ancestor see fig. ent - form bohm s version epr experiment @xmath4 might correspond to spin - zero particle breaking into two spin - half particles opposite spins paper self contained for short questions notation definitions refer to ref.@xcite longer tutorial paper same notation represent random variables by underlined letters @xmath5 values @xmath2 @xmath6 number elements in @xmath5 @xmath7 cartesian product of @xmath5 @xmath8 @xmath9 hilbert space dimension @xmath6 @xmath10 tensor product of @xmath9 @xmath11 red indices summed over @xmath12 ) @xmath13 probability distributions on @xmath5 @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 density matrices @xmath9 three random variables @xmath17 define mutual information_(mi ) by h = h ( ) + h ( ) - h ( , ) conditional mutual information(cmi h h + h - h h -h -h ) + h ( ) @xmath18 @xmath19 not true construct examples cmi greater or smaller than mi known classical information theory define analogous quantities for quantum physics @xmath20 @xmath21 define s ( ) = s ( _ ) + s ( _ ) -s ( _ , ) s( ) = s -s _ ) -s ( _, ) + s ( _ ,, ) review cmi definition of @xmath0classical bayesian net in fig. ent - form represents probability distribution p(a b ) = p(a| ) p(b | ) p ( ) @xmath22 is identically zero define @xmath0 by e_f(p _ , ) = _ p _ ,, k h ( @xmath23 all probability distributions @xmath24 with fixed marginal @xmath25 @xmath0 is function of @xmath25 if @xmath23 contains @xmath24 @xmath26 true if @xmath23 all probability distributions with arbitrary positive values of @xmath27 not if only with fixed @xmath27 value right hand side of eq. vanishes if @xmath23 includes all @xmath27 values motivation for defining @xmath0 measure of entanglement exclusively quantum @xmath28 is probability distribution for @xmath29 @xmath30 orthonormal basis for @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 separable density matrix @xmath35 of form _ = check @xmath36 .quantum case define @xmath0 by e_f ( _ ) = _ _ , ks ( ) eq : quan - ent - form @xmath23 equals @xmath37 @xmath27 @xmath38 @xmath0 function of @xmath39 if @xmath23 contains @xmath35 form @xmath0 is zero quantum @xmath0 nonzero even if @xmath23 contains density matrices with @xmath27 values set @xmath40 @xmath41 subset of @xmath42 restricts @xmath35 form with @xmath40 identical factor 2 to definition @xmath0 bennett et al ref.@xcite @xmath23 choices set @xmath23 equal to @xmath44 subset of @xmath42 restricts @xmath35 form @xmath45 need not be pure @xmath46 represent different degrees information about @xmath35 created @xmath42 represents total ignorance define classical @xmath1 next section find quantum counterpart consider classical bayesian net of fig. arrow from @xmath47 to @xmath48 allows classical communication from alice to bob@xmath49 @xmath51 net fig. satisfies p(a, b ) = x p(a a ) p(b , b p(x ) ) prob - ent - dist p(x ) = p(a|)p(b|)p ( p(x ) = p(a|)p(b|)p( ) consider @xmath53 @xmath54 fixed known value 0 for definiteness p(a , b | a=b=0 ) = @xmath55 short - hand for @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 define @xmath1 by e_d(p _ , p_ ) = _ u , v _ p _ k h @xmath23 probability distributions @xmath61 fixed marginal @xmath62 satisfies eq. prob - ent - dist @xmath62 depends on @xmath63 maximize @xmath64 @xmath1 function of @xmath65 @xmath66 net of fig. communication arrow satisfies e_d(p _ p_)e_f(p _ ) + e_f(p_ )eq : ed - lt - ef show h ( : | , : ,| , eq : cmis - goal limits left side gives h ( , , | , ) eq : cmis - left independence prime unprimed variables h ( | ) = h( ) + h(:| ) eq : cmis - right]eqs. left right imply eq. ed - lt - ef ) concentrate establishing eq.([eq cmis - goal ) events @xmath67 before @xmath55 independent @xmath55 write h ( , , | ) = h ( , : , | , , ) eq : gamma - indep eq. - goal equivalent h ( : | , ) eq : cmis - follows lemma proven appendix net fig. data - pro satisfies h ( : | ) eq : dat - pro - cmi ] quantum counterpart classical @xmath1 defined @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52@xmath68 @xmath69 given @xmath70 unitary transformation mapping @xmath71 @xmath72 : u^ _ = 1 @xmath73 @xmath74is unitary transformation mapping @xmath75 @xmath76 : v^a _ = 1 define projector on @xmath9 : _ ^a= _ _ consider density matrix| = _ a _ ^a u v^a rho1-ent - dist @xmath77 defined @xmath78 equation expressed index notation & = & + & define @xmath1 by e_d ( _ _ ) = _ u , v _ quan - ent - dist @xmath23 contains all density matrices @xmath79 fixed marginal @xmath80 satisfies eq.( rho1-ent - dist ] ) prove two data processing inequalities inequality relative entropy. @xmath81 @xmath84 matrix of non - negative numbers @xmath85 d(p//q)d(tp//tq ) @xmath86 matrix product of column vector @xmath82 times matrix @xmath87 two random variables @xmath88 @xmath89 shorthand @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 two cmi rewritten relative entropy h ( | ) = p d ( q^ _ q^_q^ _ ) h| ) = p d ( q^ _ q^_q^ _ ) show d ( q^ _ q^_q^ _ d ( q^ _ q^_q^ _ present lemma proven last inequality lemma dpi - re ] transition probability matrix @xmath93 tucci quantum entanglement conditional information transmission quant - ph/9909041 separability density matrices conditional information transmission ph/0005119 entanglement formation conditional information transmission/0010041 method quantum entanglement ph/0101123 entanglement mixtures two qubits - ph/0103040 data processing inequality relative entropy@xcite page 300 proof inequality page 55 i. csiszar j. korner information theory - coding theorems discrete memoryless systems academic press 1981 | 0.508647 | 3,395 | 1,764 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,029 | we study the behavior of dynamically - generated baryon resonances with heavy - quark content within a unitarized coupled - channel theory in matter that fulfills heavy - quark spin symmetry constraints .
we analyze the implications for the formation of charmed mesic nuclei and the propagation of heavy mesons in heavy - ion collisions from rhic to fair . | the study of the properties of hadrons under extreme conditions is one of the main research activities of several experimental programs and , in particular , of the forthcoming fair ( germany ) project .
the aim is to move from the light - quark sector to the heavy - quark domain and to face new challenges where charm and new symmetries , such as heavy - quark symmetries , will play a significant role .
one of the primary goals is to understand the nature of newly discovered states and , in particular , baryonic states with charm and bottom degrees of freedom . in that respect , approaches based on unitarized coupled - channel dynamics
have shown a tremendous success in the past .
recently , a unitarized coupled - channel scheme that incorporates heavy - quark spin symmetry ( hqss ) @xcite constraints has been developed @xcite .
hqss is a proper symmetry of the strong interaction that appears when the quark masses become larger than the typical confinement scale .
furthermore , nuclear medium corrections have been implemented @xcite to study the properties of the newly discovered heavy baryonic states in dense matter and their influence on heavy mesons in nuclear matter and nuclei . in this work
we study the properties of heavy hadrons in dense matter .
we aim at investigating nuclear medium effects on dynamically - generated heavy baryonic resonances and the consequences for the formation of charmed mesic nuclei as well as the propagation of heavy mesons under extreme conditions .
heavy baryonic states are dynamically generated by the scattering of mesons and baryons within a unitarized coupled - channel approach . in this work we employ a model that explicitly incorporates hqss @xcite .
hqss predicts that all types of spin interactions involving heavy quarks vanish for infinitely massive quarks , thus , connecting vector and pseudoscalar mesons containing heavy quarks .
furthermore , chiral symmetry fixes the lowest order interaction between goldstone bosons and other hadrons by means of the weinberg - tomozawa ( wt ) term .
this predictive model includes all basic hadrons ( pseudoscalar and vector mesons , and @xmath1 and @xmath2 baryons ) and it reduces to the wt interaction in the sector where goldstone bosons are involved while incorporating hqss in the sector where heavy quarks participate .
this scheme is justified in view of the reasonable outcome of the su(6 ) extension in the three - flavor sector @xcite and on a formal plausibleness in the vector - meson exchange picture of the interaction in the heavy pseudoscalar meson - baryon sector .
the extended wt model with hqss constraints is used as the kernel of the on - shell bethe - salpeter equation in coupled channels so as to calculate the scattering amplitudes .
the poles of the scattering amplitudes are the dynamically - generated heavy baryonic resonances . in this work we present results in the sector with heavy ( charm / bottom ) ( h ) , strange ( s ) and isospin ( i ) content such as @xmath3 , where the @xmath0 states are found @xcite .
we study the generalized weinberg s sum rule @xcite to estimate the importance of the different meson - baryon channels for the generation of the @xmath0 states . in table
[ fig : reso ] we show the spin - parity ( @xmath4 ) , mass ( @xmath5 ) and width ( @xmath6 ) of the different charmed and bottomed @xmath0 states , together with the absolute value of the coupling to the dominant meson - baryon channels ( @xmath7 ) .
the quantity @xmath8 represents the _ compositeness _ of the hadronic state in terms of all the considered channels , and @xmath9 is referred to as its _
elementariness_. a small value of @xmath9 indicates that the state is well described by the contributions explicitly considered , namely , @xmath10-wave meson - baryon channels , while a larger value of @xmath9 indicates that , for that state , significant pieces of information are missing in the model .
we obtain two @xmath11 and one @xmath12 @xmath0 states .
we find that the @xmath0 states which are bound states ( the three @xmath13 ) or narrow resonances ( one @xmath14 ) are well described as molecular states composed of @xmath10-wave meson - baryon pairs .
the @xmath15 wide @xmath14 as well as the @xmath16 @xmath17 states display smaller compositeness . with respect to the detailed composition of the states , we find that the first @xmath18 states of each flavor couple strongly to pseudoscalar-@xmath19 and vector-@xmath19 channels . for the second @xmath18 states ,
the main observation is its sizable coupling to the lightest channels @xmath20 .
another observation is the similar structure of the second @xmath18 and @xmath21 states , which appear as hqss or spin - flavor partners .
the in - medium modifications of the dynamically - generated @xmath0 states ( and others ) have important consequences on the properties of heavy mesons in matter . in particular , the properties of open - charm mesons in matter have been object of recent analysis due to the consequences for charmonium suppression . moreover , the existence of charmed meson bound states in nuclei have been predicted in @xmath22pb @xcite , using an attractive @xmath23 and @xmath24 -meson potential in the nuclear medium within a quark - meson coupling ( qmc ) model .
the experimental observation of these bound states , though , can be problematic since their widths could be very large compared to the separation of the levels . within our model , we obtain that the @xmath25-nucleus states are weakly bound ( see fig .
[ fig : medio ] ) , in contrast to previous results using the qmc model .
moreover , those states have significant widths @xcite , in particular , for @xmath22pb .
only @xmath25-nucleus bound states are possible since the coulomb interaction forbids the formation of bound states for @xmath26 mesons . as for @xmath24 mesons in nuclei , not only @xmath27 but
also @xmath28 bind in nuclei @xcite .
the information on bound states is very valuable for gaining insight into the meson - nucleus interaction at the panda experiment at fair . nevertheless , the experimental observation of @xmath23 and @xmath24-meson bound states is a difficult task .
open - charm mesons with high momenta would be produced in antiproton - nucleus collisions at panda and it is a challenge to bind them in nuclei @xcite .
information on the properties of heavy mesons in matter can be also achieved by analyzing the heavy - meson propagation in the hot and dense medium created in heavy - ion collisions @xcite .
the heavy - meson propagation can be studied by means of solving the corresponding fokker - planck equation .
the two relevant quantities to be determined are the drag ( @xmath29 ) and diffusion coefficients ( @xmath30 ) of heavy mesons in hot dense matter .
these are obtained from an effective field theory that incorporates both the chiral and hqss in the meson @xcite and baryon sectors @xcite .
one interesting observable is the behaviour of the spatial diffusion coefficient @xmath31 that appears in fick s diffusion law in medium , given in terms of the scalar @xmath32 and @xmath33 coefficients @xcite . in fig .
[ fig : diffusion ] we show @xmath34 for @xmath23 and @xmath35 mesons following isentropic trajectories ( @xmath36=ct ) from rhic to fair energies . for the @xmath23 mesons ,
we observe that the dependence of the @xmath34 on the entropy per baryon is similar in the hadronic and quark phase ( below and above the transition temperature of @xmath37 , respectively ) .
the possible matching between curves in both phases for a given @xmath36 seems to indicate the possible existence of a minimum in the @xmath34 at the phase transition @xcite . for @xmath23 meson ( left plot ) and @xmath35 meson ( right plot ) ( taken from ref .
@xcite ) . for recent updates in the high - temperature phase for @xmath23 meson ,
see refs .
@xcite . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0%,height=188 ] for @xmath23 meson ( left plot ) and @xmath35 meson ( right plot ) ( taken from ref .
@xcite ) . for recent updates in the high - temperature phase for @xmath23 meson ,
see refs .
, title="fig:",scaledwidth=38.0%,height=188 ]
c. h .- d .
thanks the support of the jae - csic program . l.t . acknowledges support from the ramn y cajal research programme from ministerio de ciencia e innovacin and from fp7-people-2011-cig under contract no . pcig09-ga-2011 - 291679 .
this research was supported by spanish ministerio de economa y competitividad and european feder funds under contracts fpa2010 - 16963 , fis2011 - 28853-c02 - 02 , fpa2013 - 43425-p , fis2014 - 59386-p , fis2014 - 51948-c2 - 1-p and fis2014 - 57026-redt , and junta de andaluca grant fqm-225 .
9 isgur n and wise m b 1989 _ phys .
b _ * 232 * 113 ; neubert m 1994 _ phys . rept . _ * 245 * 259 ; manohar a v and wise m b 2000 _ camb .
monogr . part .
cosmol . _ * 10 * 1 garcia - recio c , magas v k , mizutani t , nieves j , ramos a , salcedo l l and tolos l 2009 _ phys .
d _ * 79 * 054004 gamermann d , garcia - recio c , nieves j , salcedo l l and tolos l 2010 _ phys . rev .
d _ * 81 * 094016 romanets o , tolos l , garcia - recio c , nieves j , salcedo l l and timmermans r g e 2012 _ phys .
d _ * 85 * 114032 garcia - recio c , nieves j , romanets o , salcedo l l and tolos l 2013 _ phys .
d _ * 87 * 034032 garcia - recio c , nieves j , romanets o , salcedo l l and tolos l 2013 _ phys . rev .
d _ * 87 * 074034 tolos l 2013 _ int .
j. mod .
e _ * 22 * 1330027 garcia - recio c , hidalgo - duque c , nieves j , salcedo l l and tolos l 2015 _ phys . rev
. d _ * 92 *
034011 tolos l , garcia - recio c and nieves j 2009 _ phys .
c _ * 80 * 065202 weinberg s 1963 _ phys .
_ * 130 * 776 tsushima k , lu d h , thomas a w , saito k and landau r h 1999 _ phys .
c _ * 59 * 2824 ozvenchuk v , torres - rincon j m , gossiaux p b , tolos l and aichelin j 2014 _ phys .
c _ * 90 * 054909 song t , berrehrah h , cabrera d , torres - rincon j m , tolos l , cassing w and bratkovskaya e 2015 _ phys . rev .
c _ * 92 * 014910 | study properties hadrons under extreme conditions main experimental programs forthcoming fair project aim move from light - quark to heavy - quark domain new challenges charm symmetries understand nature newly discovered states baryonic states with charm bottom degrees freedom approaches unitarized coupled - channel dynamics success scheme heavy - quark spin symmetry ( hqss ) @xcite constraints developed symmetry interaction quark masses larger than confinement scale nuclear medium corrections implemented to study properties heavy baryonic states in dense matter influence on heavy mesons nuclear matter nuclei work study properties heavy hadrons in dense matter nuclear medium effects on heavy baryonic resonances consequences formation charmed mesic nuclei propagation heavy mesons under extreme conditions heavy baryonic states generated by scattering mesons baryons within unitarized coupled - channel approach model incorporates hqss @xcite predicts spin interactions heavy quarks vanish for infinitely massive quarks connecting vector pseudoscalar mesons containing heavy quarks chiral symmetry fixes lowest order interaction between goldstone bosons hadrons weinberg - tomozawa termpredictive model includes basic hadrons pseudoscalar vector mesons @xmath1 @xmath2 baryons reduces wt interaction goldstone bosons hqss heavy quarks scheme justified reasonable outcome su(6 ) extension three - flavor sector @xcite formal plausibleness vector - meson exchange picture interaction heavy pseudoscalar meson - baryon sector extended wt model with hqss constraints kernel on - shell bethe - salpeter equation channels calculate scattering amplitudes poles scattering amplitudes are dynamically - generated heavy baryonic resonances present results sector with heavy strange isospin content @xmath3 @xmath0 states found @xcite study generalized weinberg s sum rule estimate importance meson - baryon channels for generation @xmath0 states table spin - parity mass width of charmed bottomed @xmath0 states absolute value coupling to dominant meson - baryon channels @xmath7 ) quantity @xmath8 represents compositeness hadronic state @xmath9 elementariness small value @xmath9 indicates state well described @xmath10-wave meson - baryon channels larger value indicates significant information missing modelobtain two @xmath11 one @xmath12 @xmath0 states @xmath0 states bound states three @xmath13 narrow resonances one @xmath14 molecular states @xmath10-wave meson - baryon pairs @xmath15 @xmath14 @xmath16 @xmath17 states display smaller compositeness first @xmath18 states couple to pseudoscalar-@xmath19 vector-@xmath19 channels second @xmath18 states observation sizable coupling to lightest channels @xmath20 similar structure second @xmath18 @xmath21 states appear hqss spin - flavor partners - modifications dynamically - generated @xmath0 states consequences properties heavy mesons matter properties open - charm mesons object analysis charmonium suppression existence charmed meson bound states in nuclei predicted in @xmath22pb @xcite @xmath23 @xmath24 -meson potential nuclear medium - meson coupling model experimental observation bound states problematic widths large separation levels @xmath25-nucleus states weakly bound fig . contrast previous results states significant widths @xcite for @xmath22pb@xmath25-nucleus bound states possible coulomb interaction forbids @xmath26 mesons @xmath24 mesons @xmath27 @xmath28 bind in nuclei @xcite information bound states valuable meson - nucleus interaction panda experiment observation @xmath23 @xmath24-meson bound states difficult open - charm mesons high momenta produced in antiproton - nucleus collisions panda challenge to bind in nuclei @xcite properties heavy mesons analyzing heavy - meson propagation in hot dense medium collisions solving fokker - planck equation relevant quantities drag @xmath29 diffusion coefficients @xmath30 ) of heavy mesons in hot dense matter obtained from field theory chiral hqss meson baryon sectors spatial diffusion coefficient @xmath31 fick s diffusion law medium scalar @xmath32 @xmath33 coefficients @xcite fig . @xmath34 @xmath23 @xmath35 mesons isentropic trajectories from rhic to fair energies dependence @xmath34 on entropy per baryon similar in hadronic quark phase below transition temperature @xmath37matching curves phases @xmath36 minimum @xmath34 phase transition @xmath23 left @xmath35 right updates high - temperature phase see refs:",scaledwidth=40.0%,height=188 @xmath23 left @xmath35 right updates high - temperature phase @xmath23 see refs=38.0%=188 thanks support jae - csic program acknowledges support ramn y cajal research programme ministerio de ciencia innovacin fp7-people-2011-cig contract-ga-2011 - 291679 research supported by spanish ministerio de economa competitividad european feder funds contracts fpa2010 - 16963 fis2011 - 28853-c02 fpa2013 - 43425 fis2014 - 59386 51948 - 57026 junta de andaluca grant isgur n wise m b 1989 phys . 232 * 113 neubert m 1994 phys . 245 * 259 manohar wise m b 2000 monogr cosmol 10 * 1 garcia - recio c magas v mizutani t nieves j ramos salcedo l l tolos l 2009 .79 * 054004 gamermann garcia - recio nieves salcedo tolos l 2010 81 * 094016 romanets tolos l nieves timmermans 2012 85 * 114032 garcia - recio nieves romanets salcedo l tolos 2013 87 034032 garcia nieves salcedo tolos 87 074034 tolos 2013 22 * 1330027 garcia - recio c hidalgo - duque nieves j salcedo l tolos l 2015 92 * 034011 tolos l garcia - recio nieves j 2009 80 * 065202 weinberg s 1963 130 * 776 tsushima k lu d h thomas saito k landau r 1999 59 * 2824 ozvenchuk v torres - rincon gossiaux p tolos l aichelin j 2014 90 * 054909 song t berrehrah h cabrera d torres - rincon tolos l cassing w bratkovskaya e 2015 92 * 014910 | 0.358439 | 2,658 | 1,426 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,032 | we have carried out the basic research for the accelerator and tokamak control system based on the experimental physics and industrial control system ( epics ) .
we have used the process database and the state notation language ( snl ) in the epics to develop the simulator which represents as a virtual machine . in this paper . in this paper
, we introduce the simulator of the global orbit feedback system as an example .
this simulates the global orbit feedback system under the constraint conditions for pohang light source ( pls ) storage ring .
we describe the details of the feedback algorithm and the realization of the simulator . | when the beam position change takes place during the conventional global orbit correction processes , the photon beam through the beamline is affected , and it results in the alignment of mirrors and monochromators .
this is particularly severe for a long beamline such as the undulator beamlines .
this problem can be overcome by introducing a local bump at the particular beamline .
however , for some light sources , there are not enough corrector magnets to generate local bumps as much as needed .
this difficulty can be overcome when we correct the cod under the condition where the beam positions at particular points are not changed .
this is our main objective to develop a method of the closed orbit correction under constraint conditions .
the beam position is normally described as a vector @xmath0 measured by @xmath1 beam position monitors ( bpm ) . in order to correct the cod ,
we need @xmath2 corrector magnets with their strengths described as a vector @xmath3 .
when the corrector magnets kick a beam , the new beam positions @xmath4 can be described as follows.@xmath5 here , @xmath6 is called the response matrix of @xmath7 dimensions whose components are given by @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the betatron tune of the storage ring , and @xmath10 and @xmath11 are the beta function and the phase function for the @xmath12 bpm and @xmath13 corrector magnet , respectively . in order to reduce the cod , we have to choose the kick of each corrector magnet satisfying @xmath14 it is called the psinom algorithm@xcite .
the cod correction is actually a minimization procedure of @xmath15 defined as @xmath16 by using the relations of vector operators which are hyper - dimensional gradient operators , we can get the same result of psinom algorithm as shown in eq .
( [ coc_eqn_ordinary_cod_relation ] ) .
this algorithm includes an inversion procedure of the matrix @xmath17 . in some cases , we can get unacceptable corrections due to the ill - posedness of @xmath17 . a regularization method is introduced to avoid this problem . in this case , @xmath15 is written as @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the regularization parameter . then the minimum corrector kicks can be determined by @xmath20 this equation represents the modified psinom algorithm , and we can relax the inversion problem of the singular matrix by using the diagonal matrix @xmath21 when @xmath17 is singular@xcite . after having the new closed orbit with the minimum distortion from eq .
( [ coc_eqn_modified_psinom ] ) , the new orbit is generally different from the original orbit . sometimes , this difference can be taken place at very sensitive locations such as the entrance and the exit of an undulator .
if the beamline is well aligned for this undulator , a cod correction should be avoided in this region .
a constraint condition can be described in terms of the beam position at @xmath22 bpm such as @xmath23 here , @xmath24 is the @xmath22 row of the response matrix @xmath6 .
also , @xmath25 and @xmath26 are the beam positions before and after the correction , respectively .
since we want to keep this position unchanged , @xmath27 should be zero .
if there are @xmath28 bpms involved in the constraint condition , we can write the constraint condition as follows .
@xmath29 here , @xmath30 is the ( @xmath31 ) sub - matrix of the response matrix .
each component of @xmath30 corresponds to the bpm involved in the constraint condition .
we also assume that @xmath3 has a non - trivial solution .
we now add this constraint condition to the modified psinom algorithm to obtain the new @xmath15 such as , @xmath32 \cr + \frac{1}{2 } \left < { \rm\bf k } \right| \alpha \left| { \rm\bf k } \right > + \left
< { \rm\bf \gamma } \right| { \rm\bf c}^t \left| { \rm\bf k } \right > .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath33 is the lagrangian multiplier , and it is an @xmath28 dimensional vector . by following the derivative to the corrector strength , we can get the vector @xmath3 which minimizes the closed orbit distortion outside the constraint region such as , @xmath34 here , we define the square matrices of @xmath35 dimensional @xmath36 and @xmath37 dimensional @xmath38 as follows .
@xmath39 eq .
( [ coc_eqn_new_correction ] ) can be rewritten as @xmath40 now , we can remove the lagrangian multiplier @xmath41 in eq .
( [ coc_eqn_new_correction ] ) by using the above equation .
then , we can finally get the kick values of the corrector magnets as follows .
the algorithm developed in the previous section has been successfully tested for the pohang light source ( pls ) operation .
the new correction code is written in c language and it is installed in one of the operator consoles which is a sun workstation . although the pls control system is not using experimental physics and industrial control system ( epics ) which is used in many accelerator laboratories world - widely , there is a plan to upgrade the control system based on epics technology@xcite . as a part of such upgrade activity
, we have started the development orbit correction algorithm with epics .
since we do not have any epics - based control system yet , we decide to develop the orbit correction simulator using epics . in order to seek the way to adopt our orbit correction algorithm into epics , we have considered two ways : one is based on the subroutine record and the other is using the state notation language ( snl ) program .
the first method needs new record support that runs the orbit correction algorithm . to do this
, the correction code is required to be written upon the protocol required by the record support such as the entry structure and the callback structure .
this approach gives relatively fast response because this method uses database access and can access the record by process passive mode@xcite .
this is a good feature for the realtime system but the large portion of the orbit correction code we have already tested must be rewritten according to the protocol of the record support .
one of important tasks of epics input / output controller ( ioc ) is the sequencer that runs programs written in snl .
the snl considers the control object as the state machine and treats transitions between states .
the sequencer monitors the transitions for the snl and runs callback functions using the entry table the corresponding program written in snl .
since the sequencer accesses to the record via channel access ( ca ) and the record access is only possible through non - process passive mode , there are some restrictions in access time or the treatment of records .
however , this method can directly imbed the program written in c language . also ,
unlike the subroutine record , this method can remove program tasks without rebooting the system , which gives the code debugging very easy@xcite .
thus , the second method gives more benefits when the system does not require heavy realtime demands . upon reviewing the two methods , we have decided to use the latter method .
the orbit correction simulator is developed in ioc level and has the snl program imbedding c codes and several database records , as shown in fig .
[ fig_schemetic ] .
there are two parts in the snl program : one for the feedback including the orbit correction algorithm and the other for the simulator which emulates the pls storage ring .
the latter calculates orbit changes from _ ai : kick$(kick_no ) _ records which store the corrector strengths obtained from the response matrix measured at the pls .
this process is actually a product of matrix and column vectors .
the calculated orbit changes are stored at _ ai : corrorbit$(bpm_no ) _ records . in the next step ,
the corrector strengths s calculated by the algorithm described in the previous section and the results are stored at _ al : kick$(kick_no)_. the snl program we have developed consists of four state sets . since they are linked together and interacted dynamically via epics database , we need to understand the database and its records as well as the linkage between them . the _ ai : kick$(kick_no ) _ record uses the analog input record to represent the corrector strength . there are 70 records altogether as representing 70 correctors in the pls storage ring .
they are linking the simulator and the feedback in a parallel manner .
the index _ $ ( kick_no ) _ is the integer value between one and 70 . the records of _ ai : orgorbit$(bpm_no ) _ and _ ai : corrorbit$(bpm_no )
_ are the orbit distortion before the feedback is applied and the orbit change after the feedback , respectively .
they are using analog input records . since these records represents the changes at the pls bpm , _ $ ( bpm_no ) _ is the interger value between one and 108 .
the superposition of these two records gives new orbit .
this can be done by the calculation record _ calc : orbit$(bpm_no)_. since this calculation record is linked forwardly from _ ai : orgorbit$(bpm_no ) _ and _ ai : corrorbit$(bpm_no ) _ , the superposition
is newly calculated whenever the values of two records are changed .
on the other hand , _ ai : numbpm _ , _ ai : numcorrector _ , _ ai : startconstr _ , and _ ai : endconstr _ are representing the bpms and correctors used in the correction algorithm , start and end point of the constraint region , respectively .
they are using analog input records and notifying the snl program if necessary .
the other records are binary input records and they are representing necessary status flags .
they are used as the mediator of state transitions between state sets in the snl program .
we have developed the cod correction algorithm under the constraint condition where the beam position at particular point is not changed .
the new algorithm is based on the modified psinom algorithm which includes the regularization process in order to avoid the inversion problem of the ill - posed response matrices .
we have confirmed that this algorithm is working well and is in good agreement with the experimental results @xcite . even though the pls is planning to upgrade their control system with epics ,
there is no working epics based control system at pls . due to this , we have developed the orbit correction simulator using c - code embedded snl program based on epics technology .
this simulator part can be replaced by the real control system with minor changes after the completion of the upgrade .
1 w. herr : " algorithms and procedures used in the orbit correction package cocu , " cern sl/95 - 07 ( ap ) , 1995 . y. n. tang and s. krinsky : proc
. aip conf .
* 315 * ( aip press , 1993 ) 87 .
see url"_http://www.aps.anl.gov / epics _ " martin r. kraimer : " epics ioc application developer s guide , " aps / anl , 1998 andy kozubal : " state notation language and sequencer user guide , " lanl , 1995 philip stanley , _ et al . _ : " epics record reference manual , " lanl , aps / anl , 1995 kukhee kim , jinhyuk choi , tae - yeon lee , guinyun kim , moohyun cho , won namkung , in soo ko : jpn . j. appl
* 40 * ( 2001 ) 4233 . | beam position change during global orbit correction photon beam results in alignment of mirrors monochromators severe for long beamline undulator beamlines by introducing local bump at beamline some light sources not enough corrector magnets local bumps difficulty cod beam positions at points not changed main objective closed orbit correction under constraint conditions beam position as vector @xmath0 measured by @xmath1 beam position monitors correct cod need @xmath2 corrector magnets strengths vector @xmath3 corrector magnets kick beam new beam positions @xmath4@xmath5 @xmath6 response matrix of @xmath7 dimensions components by @xmath8 @xmath9 betatron tune storage ring beta function phase function for @xmath12 @xmath13 corrector magnet to reduce cod choose kick of each corrector magnet satisfying @xmath14 psinom algorithm@xcite cod correction minimization procedure of @xmath15 @xmath16 relations of vector operators hyper - dimensional gradient operators same result of psinom algorithm in algorithm includes inversion procedure of matrix @xmath17unacceptable corrections due to ill - posedness @xmath17 regularization method introduced avoid @xmath15 written as @xmath18 @xmath19 regularization parameter minimum corrector kicks determined by @xmath20 equation represents modified psinom algorithm relax inversion problem using diagonal matrix @xmath21 when @xmath17 singular@xcite new closed orbit minimum distortion from eq new orbit different from original difference at sensitive locations entrance exit undulator if beamline aligned cod correction avoided constraint condition beam position at @xmath22 bpm @xmath24 is @xmath22 row of response matrix @xmath6 @xmath25 @xmath26 beam positions before after correction position unchanged @xmath27 should be zero if @xmath28 bpms involved in constraint condition constraint condition @xmath30 is @xmath31 sub - matrix of response matrix each component @xmath30 corresponds to bpm constraint condition @xmath3 has non - trivial solutionadd constraint condition to modified psinom algorithm new @xmath15 @xmath32 \cr + \frac{1}{2 } \left < { \rm\bf k } \right|\alpha \left \rm\bf k }\right > \rm\bf \gamma } \rm\bf c}^t \rm\bf k } >{aligned} @xmath33 lagrangian multiplier @xmath28 dimensional vector derivative corrector strength vector @xmath3 minimizes closed orbit distortion outside constraint region @xmath34 define square matrices of @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 eq_eqn_new_correction rewritten as @xmath40 remove lagrangian multiplier @xmath41 in eq . coc_eqn_new_correction equation get kick values of corrector magnets algorithm tested for pohang light source pls ) operation new correction code written in c language installed in sun workstation pls control system not using control system plan to upgrade control system epics technology started development orbit correction algorithm with epicsepics - based control system develop orbit correction simulator using epics adopt orbit correction algorithm into epics considered two ways one based on subroutine record other using state notation language ( snl ) program first method needs new record support orbit correction algorithm correction code written upon protocol record support approach gives fast response uses database access access record by process passive mode good feature for realtime system large portion orbit correction code must be rewritten according to protocol record support epics input / output controller sequencer runs programs in snl snl considers control object state machine treats transitions between states monitors transitions runs callback functions using entry program snl sequencer accesses record via channel access through non - process passive mode restrictions in access time treatment of records method can imbed program in c language remove program tasks without rebooting system code debugging easy second method more benefits when heavy realtime demands decided to use latter method orbit correction simulator developed in ioc level has snl program imbedding c codes database records shown in fig .two parts in snl program feedback orbit correction algorithm simulator pls storage ring calculates orbit changes from : kick$(kick_no ) _ records corrector strengths from response matrix at pls process product of matrix column vectors calculated orbit changes stored at : corrorbit$(bpm_no ) _ records corrector strengths calculated by algorithm results stored at _ al : kick$(kick_no)_ snl program four state sets linked via epics database understand database records linkage : kick$(kick_no ) _ record uses analog input record corrector strength 70 records correctors in pls storage ring linking simulator feedback index _ $ ( kick_no ) _ is integer value between one and 70 records of : orgorbit$(bpm_no ) corrorbit$(bpm are orbit distortion before feedback orbit change after feedback analog input records changes at pls bpm _ $ ( bpm_no ) _ interger value between one and 108 superposition of records gives new orbit by calculation record _ calc : orbit$(bpm_no)_ linked from orgorbit$ superposition newly calculated whenever values records changednumbpm numcorrector startconstr endconstr bpms correctors in correction algorithm start end point constraint region using analog input records notifying snl program if necessary other binary input necessary status flags mediator state transitions developed cod correction algorithm under constraint condition beam position not changed new algorithm based on modified psinom algorithm regularization process avoid inversion problem ill - posed response matrices algorithm working well with experimental results pls upgrade control system epics no working epics control system at pls developed orbit correction simulator using c - code embedded snl program based epics technology simulator can be replaced by real control system with minor changes after upgrade w. herr algorithms procedures orbit correction package cern sl/95 - 07 1995. tang s. krinsky aip conf. 315 press 1993 ) 87_http://www.aps.anl.gov / epics martin r. kraimer epics ioc application developer s guide aps anl 1998 andy kozubal state notation language sequencer user guide lanl 1995 philip stanleyepics record manual 1995 kukhee kim jinhyuk choi tae - yeon lee guinyun kim moohyun cho won namkung soo ko appl 2001 4233 | 0.431758 | 2,530 | 1,287 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,064 | alice @xcite will study nucleus nucleus and proton proton collisions at the lhc .
the main goal of the experiment is to investigate the properties of qcd matter at the extreme energy densities that will be reached in pb pb collisions .
heavy quarks ( charm and beauty ) are regarded as powerful tools for this study .
after briefly reviewing the alice heavy - flavour program , we will describe the preparation for the first measurements to be performed with pp collisions . | the measurement of open charm and beauty production in pb
pb collisions at @xmath0 will allow to investigate the mechanisms of heavy - quark production , propagation and hadronization in the hot and dense qcd medium formed in high - energy heavy - ion collisions .
heavy - quark production measurements in pp collisions at @xmath1@xmath2 , besides providing the necessary baseline for the study of medium effects in pb
pb collisions , are interesting _ per se _ , as a test of qcd in a new domain , 57 times above the present energy frontier at the tevatron .
the @xmath3 and @xmath4 production yields assumed as the baseline for alice simulation studies are : for pp collisions at @xmath2 , 0.16 and 0.007 , respectively @xcite ( and lower by about 25% at 10 tev , the envisaged energy of the first long pp run ) ; for the 5% most central pb
pb collisions at @xmath5 , 115 and 4.6 , respectively .
these numbers are obtained from pqcd calculations at nlo @xcite with a reasonable set of parameters @xcite , including nuclear shadowing .
an illustration of the theoretical uncertainty bands , spanning over a factor about 2 , for the d and b meson cross sections will be shown in section [ central ] , along with the expected alice sensitivity .
heavy quark medium - induced quenching is one of the most captivating topics to be addressed in collisions at the lhc . due to the qcd nature of parton energy loss , quarks
are predicted to lose less energy than gluons ( that have a higher colour charge ) and , in addition , the ` dead - cone effect ' is expected to reduce the energy loss of massive quarks with respect to light partons @xcite .
therefore , one should observe a pattern of decreasing suppression when going from the mostly gluon - originated light - flavour hadrons ( @xmath6 or @xmath7 ) to d and b mesons . in terms of the pb pb - to - pp nuclear modification factors of the @xmath8-differential yields : @xmath9 @xcite .
the alice experimental setup , described in detail in @xcite , allows for the detection of open charm and beauty hadrons in the high - multiplicity environment of central pb
pb collisions at lhc energy , where a few thousand charged particles might be produced per unit of rapidity .
the heavy - flavour capability of the alice detector is provided by : tracking system ; the inner tracking system ( its ) @xcite , the time projection chamber ( tpc ) @xcite and the transition radiation detector ( trd ) @xcite , embedded in a magnetic field of @xmath10 t , allow for track reconstruction in the pseudorapidity range @xmath11 with a @xmath8 resolution better than 2% up to @xmath12 and a transverse impact parameter , defined as the track distance of closest approach to the interaction vertex , in the plane transverse to the beams . ]
resolution better than @xmath13 for @xmath14 ( the two innermost layers of the its , @xmath15 and @xmath16 , are equipped with silicon pixel detectors ) .
particle identification system ; charged hadrons are separated via @xmath17 in the tpc and via time - of - flight in the tof detector ; electrons are separated from charged hadrons in the dedicated trd , in the tpc , and in the electromagnetic calorimeter ( emcal ) ; muons are identified in the muon spectrometer covering the pseudo - rapidity range @xmath18 .
simulation studies @xcite have shown that alice has large potential to carry out a rich heavy - flavour physics programme .
the main analyses in preparation are : open charm : fully reconstructed hadronic decays @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 ( under study ) in @xmath11 ; single muons and di - muons in @xmath18 .
open beauty : inclusive single leptons @xmath25 in @xmath11 and @xmath26 in @xmath18 ; inclusive displaced charmonia @xmath27 ( under study ) ; b - tagging of jets reconstructed in the tracking detectors and in the emcal ( under study ) . at present , the installation of most of the alice detector is completed and , since december 2007 , the different sub - systems are being commissioned and calibrated with cosmic - ray tracks ( atmospheric muons ) @xcite . in view of the heavy - flavour measurements , a crucial part of the commissioning
is represented by the alignment of the its , that is the determination of the actual position and orientation in space of its 2198 silicon sensors .
the alignment , which has to reach a precision well below @xmath28 in order to guarantee a close - to - design tracking resolution , will be performed using tracks from cosmics and first pp collisions .
the first results @xcite , obtained with cosmics collected during summer 2008 , indicate that the target precision is within reach . on the offline software side ,
an intense activity for the preparation and refinement of all the analysis tools is ongoing . in particular
, the analysis model using the grid distributed computing environment is being tested . as an example , in a recent campaign , more than @xmath29 pp events , corresponding to about 1/10 of the expected yearly statistics , have been simulated by running up to 15,000 simultaneous processes at almost 100 centres worldwide .
the simulated data are now being analyzed remotely by several tens of single users . in the following sections
, we report on a selection of results extrapolated to the expected statistics collected by alice per lhc year .
central ( 05% @xmath30 ) events in 1 month at @xmath31 and @xmath32 pp events in 8 months at @xmath33 , in the barrel detectors ; the forward muon arm will collect about 40 times larger samples of muon - trigger events ( i.e. @xmath34 central events ) ; safety factors are included . ]
@xmath8-differential ( left ) and b @xmath35-differential ( right ) production cross sections in @xmath36 , in pp at 14 tev , compared to nlo pqcd predictions ( mnr @xcite and fonll @xcite ) .
inner error bars represent the statistical errors , outer error bars represent the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors .
a normalization error of 5% is not shown.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=42.0% ] @xmath8-differential ( left ) and b @xmath35-differential ( right ) production cross sections in @xmath36 , in pp at 14 tev , compared to nlo pqcd predictions ( mnr @xcite and fonll @xcite ) .
inner error bars represent the statistical errors , outer error bars represent the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors .
a normalization error of 5% is not shown.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=42.0% ] among the most promising channels for open charm detection are the @xmath19 ( @xmath37 , branching ratio @xmath38 ) and @xmath20 ( @xmath39 , branching ratio @xmath40 ) decays , reconstructed in the tpc and its , in the rapidity range @xmath36 .
the detection strategy to cope with the large combinatorial background from the underlying event is based on the selection of displaced - vertex topologies , i.e. separation of the decay tracks from the primary vertex and good alignment between the reconstructed d meson momentum and flight direction @xcite .
the accessible @xmath8 range for the @xmath41 is @xmath42@xmath12 in and @xmath10@xmath12 in pp , with statistical errors better than 1520% at high @xmath8 .
similar capability is expected for the @xmath43 .
the systematic errors ( acceptance and efficiency corrections , centrality selection for pb
pb ) are expected to be smaller than 20% .
the production of open beauty at central rapidity , @xmath36 , can be studied by detecting the semi - electronic decays of b - hadrons ( branching ratio @xmath44 ) . given that electrons from beauty have an average impact parameter @xmath45 , it is possible to obtain a high - purity sample with a strategy that relies on electron identification ( tpc and trd ) and impact parameter cut ( to reduce the semi - electronic charm - decay component and reject misidentified @xmath46 and @xmath47 from dalitz decays and @xmath48 conversions ) . as an example , with @xmath49 central events ,
this strategy is expected to allow for the measurement of the b - decay electron @xmath8-differential cross section in the range @xmath50 with statistical errors lower than 15% at high @xmath8 .
similar performance figures are expected for pp collisions . in fig .
[ fig : d0btoe ] we superimpose the simulated results for d@xmath51 @xmath52 and b @xmath53 in pp collisions to the predictions from the mnr @xcite and fonll @xcite calculations .
the comparison shows that alice will be able to perform a sensitive test of the pqcd predictions for c and b production at lhc energy . by comparing to theoretical predictions the expected alice precision for the measurement of the nuclear modification factors @xmath54 and @xmath55 , and for the heavy - to - light ratio @xmath56 , it has been shown @xcite that the charm and beauty measurements described above can be used to test the expected colour - charge and mass dependence of parton energy loss .
charm and beauty production can be measured also in the forward muon spectrometer ( @xmath18 ) by analyzing the single - muon @xmath8 and di - muon invariant - mass distributions @xcite .
the main background to the ` heavy - flavour muon ' signal is @xmath46 and @xmath57 decays . the cut @xmath58 is applied in order to increase the signal - to - background ratio .
then , a technique that performs a simultaneous fit of the single - muon and di - muon distributions with the charm and beauty components , using the predicted shapes as templates , allows to extract a @xmath35-differential cross section for d and b mesons . the expected performance for pp collisions is shown in fig .
[ fig : muons ] .
since only minimal cuts are applied , the statistical errors are expected to be lower than 5% up to muon @xmath59 .
the systematic errors , mainly due to the fit assumptions , are expected to be lower than 20% .
high-@xmath8 single muons could provide the first observation of b - quark energy loss at lhc .
indeed , the single - muon @xmath8 distribution at lhc energies is expected to be dominated by b decays in the range @xmath60 and by w - boson decays above this range . therefore ,
the central - to - peripheral muon nuclear modification factor of @xmath61 would be suppressed in the region dominated by beauty , due to parton energy loss , and would rapidly increase to about one ( binary scaling ) , where the medium - blind muons from w decays dominate @xcite . , using single muons and di - muons , in pp at @xmath62 .
boxes represent the systematic uncertainties .
error bars represent the statistical uncertainties.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] , using single muons and di - muons , in pp at @xmath62 .
boxes represent the systematic uncertainties .
error bars represent the statistical uncertainties.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ]
heavy quarks will provide ways to test different aspects of qcd under extreme conditions at the lhc : from the predictions of pqcd at a new energy scale , in pp collisions , to the mechanism of energy loss in a qcd medium , in pb pb .
the alice detectors and analysis tools are being commissioned , with the aim of achieving the excellent tracking , vertexing and particle identification performance that will allow to accomplish the rich heavy - flavour physics program . | measurement open charm beauty production in collisions at @xmath0 heavy - quark production propagation hadronization in hot dense qcd medium high - energy heavy ion collisions heavy - quark production measurements in collisions at @xmath1@xmath2 baseline medium effects test of qcd new domain 57 times above energy frontier at tevatron @xmath3 @xmath4 production yields for alice simulation studies are pp collisions at @xmath2 0.16 0.007 lower 25% at 10 tev 5% central pb collisions at @xmath5 115 4.6 , numbers obtained from pqcd calculations at nlo @xcite nuclear shadowing illustration theoretical uncertainty bands factor 2 for d b meson cross sections shown in section central expected alice sensitivity heavy quark medium - induced quenching captivating in collisions quarks lose less energy than gluons dead - cone effect energy loss of massive quarks light partons observe decreasing suppression from gluon - originated light - flavour hadrons @xmath6 @xmath7 to d b mesonspb pb - to - pp nuclear modification factors @xmath8-differential yields @xmath9 @xcite alice experimental setup allows detection open charm beauty hadrons high - multiplicity central pb pb collisions lhc energy few thousand charged particles per unit rapidity heavy - flavour capability alice detector tracking system inner tracking system time projection chamber transition radiation detector magnetic track reconstruction pseudorapidity range @xmath11 @xmath8 resolution better than 2% up to @xmath12 transverse impact parameter track distance closest approach interaction vertex transverse resolution better than @xmath13 @xmath14 layers @xmath15 silicon pixel detectors particle identification system charged hadrons separated via @xmath17 tpc time - of - flight tof detector electrons separated from charged hadrons trd tpc electromagnetic calorimeter muons identified muon spectrometer pseudo - rapidity range @xmath18 simulation studies alice potential heavy - flavour physics programme main analyses open charm reconstructed hadronic decays @xmath19 @xmath11 single muons di - muons @xmath18open beauty inclusive single leptons @xmath25 @xmath11 @xmath18 displaced charmonia @xmath27 under study b - tagging jets tracking detectors emcal under study installation alice detector completed since december 2007 sub - systems commissioned calibrated with cosmic - ray tracks muons @xcite heavy - flavour measurements crucial alignment position orientation 2198 silicon sensors alignment precision below @xmath28 close - to - design tracking resolution performed using tracks cosmics first pp collisions first results @xcite cosmics summer 2008 target precision within reach offline software activity preparation refinement analysis tools ongoing analysis model grid distributed computing environment tested campaign @xmath29 pp events 1/10 expected yearly statistics simulated 15,000 simultaneous processes at 100 centres worldwide simulated data analyzed remotely by users report results extrapolated to expected statistics alice per lhc year central ( 05% @xmath30 ) events in 1 month @xmath31 @xmath32 events 8 months @xmath33 barrel detectors forward muon arm 40 times larger samples muon - trigger events @xmath34 central events safety factors included@xmath8-differential left @xmath35-differential right production cross sections in @xmath36 pp 14 tev compared to nlo pqcd predictions inner error bars represent statistical errors outer bars quadratic sum statistical systematic errors normalization error 5% not shown @xmath8-differential left @xmath35-differential right production cross sections in @xmath36 14 tev compared nlo pqcd predictions inner error bars represent statistical outer bars quadratic sum statistical systematic errors normalization error 5% not shown promising channels for open charm detection @xmath19 @xmath20 decays reconstructed tpc rapidity range @xmath36 detection strategy combinatorial displaced - vertex topologies separation decay tracks from primary vertex good alignment between reconstructed d meson momentum flight direction accessible @xmath8 range for @xmath41 @xmath42@xmath12 @xmath10@xmath12 pp statistical errors better than 1520% at high @xmath8 similar capability expected for @xmath43 systematic errors smaller than 20%production beauty central rapidity @xmath36 studied detecting semi - electronic decays b - hadrons ratio @xmath44 electrons beauty average impact parameter @xmath45 high - purity sample strategy electron identification impact parameter cut charm - decay reject misidentified @xmath46 @xmath47 decays conversions @xmath49 central events strategy measurement b - decay electron @xmath8-differential cross section @xmath50 statistical errors lower than 15% high @xmath8 similar performance pp collisions fig simulated results d@xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 pp collisions predictions mnr fonll calculations alice sensitive test pqcd predictions c b production lhc energy alice precision nuclear modification factors @xmath54 @xmath55 heavy - to - light ratio @xmath56 charm beauty measurements test colour - charge mass dependence parton energy loss charm beauty production measured forward muon spectrometer @xmath18 analyzing single - muon @xmath8 di - muon invariant - mass distributions main background heavy - flavour muon signal @xmath46 @xmath57 decays cut @xmath58 signal - to - background ratiotechnique simultaneous single - muon di - muon distributions with charm beauty components predicted shapes @xmath35-differential cross section for d b mesons expected performance for pp collisions shown in fig . minimal cuts statistical errors lower than 5% up to muon @xmath59 systematic errors due to fit assumptions lower than 20% high-@xmath8 single muons first observation b - quark energy loss at lhc single - muon @xmath8 distribution at lhc dominated by b decays in @xmath60 w - boson decays above central - to - peripheral muon nuclear modification factor of @xmath61 suppressed in region by beauty due to parton energy loss increase to one medium - blind muons from w decays dominate single muons di - muons @xmath62 boxes systematic uncertainties bars statistical uncertainties heavy quarks test aspects qcd under extreme conditions at lhc predictions pqcd new energy scale mechanism energy loss in qcd mediumalice detectors analysis tools commissioned achieving excellent tracking vertexing particle identification performance heavy - flavour physics program | 0.430896 | 2,652 | 1,333 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,065 | we consider circulant graphs @xmath0 where the vertices are the integers modulo @xmath1 and the neighbours of @xmath2 are @xmath3 .
the energy of @xmath0 is a trigonometric sum of @xmath4 terms . for low values of @xmath5
we compute this sum explicitly .
we also study the asymptotics of the energy of @xmath0 for @xmath6 .
there is a known integral formula for the linear growth coefficient , we find a new expression of the form of a finite trigonometric sum with @xmath5 terms . as an application
we show that in the family @xmath0 for @xmath7 there is a finite number of hyperenergetic graphs . on the other hand
, for each @xmath8 there is at most a finite number of non - hyperenergetic graphs of the form @xmath0 .
finally we show that the graph @xmath9 minimizes the energy among all the regular graphs of degree @xmath10 .
* keywords : * circulant graph , graph energy , finite fourier transform .
2010 * msc * 05c35 ; 05c50 ; 42a05 . | let @xmath11 be a graph with @xmath1 vertices and eigenvalues @xmath12 .
the energy of @xmath11 is defined as the sum of the absolute values of its eigenvalues : @xmath13 this concept was introduced in the mathematical literature by gutman in 1978 , @xcite . for further details on this theory
we refer to @xcite and the literature cited in .
the @xmath14-vertex complete graph @xmath15 has eigenvalues @xmath16 y @xmath17 ( @xmath18 times ) .
therefore , @xmath19 . in @xcite , it was conjectured that the complete graph @xmath15 has the largest energy among all @xmath14-vertex graphs @xmath11 , that is , @xmath20 with equality iff @xmath21 . by means of counterexamples ,
this conjecture was shown to be false , see for instance @xcite .
an @xmath14-vertex graph @xmath11 whose energy satisfies @xmath22 is called _
these graphs has been introduced in @xcite in relation with some problems of molecular chemistry .
a simplest construction of a family of hyperenergetic graphs is due to walikar et al , @xcite , where authors showed that the line graph of @xmath15 , @xmath23 is hyperenergetic .
there are a number of other recent results on hyperenergetic graphs @xcite .
there are also some recent results for the hyperenergetic circulant graphs , see for instance @xcite . in this paper
we consider the following family of circulant graphs .
for each @xmath1 and @xmath5 with @xmath24 we define the circulant graph @xmath0 with vertices @xmath25 in which there is an edge between @xmath26 and @xmath14 if the inequation @xmath27 has a solution @xmath28 , see fig .
[ figure_circulant ] .
we give a closed formula for the energy of the circulant graph @xmath0 .
based on that formula we also show that the energy of the graph @xmath29 obtaining by deleting the edges of a perfect matching of a complete graph of index @xmath30 is non - hyperenegetic .
moreover , we show that the graph @xmath29 has minimal energy over the set of regular graphs of degree @xmath31 . finally , we find some bounds and explicit expressions for @xmath32 .
this allows us to conclude that for @xmath33 there is finite number of hyperenergetic graphs of the form @xmath0 ; moreover , for @xmath34 there is a finite number of non - hyperenergetic graphs of the form @xmath0 .
( -1,-1)(8,4)(2,2 ) ( 2,1 ) ( 5,2 ) ( 5,1 ) ( 4,3 ) ( 4,0 ) ( 3,0 ) ( 2,1.5)@xmath35 ( 3.5,3)@xmath36 ( 2.5,2.5)@xmath37 ( 2.5,0.5)@xmath37 ( 4,3)(5,2)(5,1)(4,0)(3,0 ) ( 4,3)(5,1 ) ( 5,2)(4,0 ) ( 5,2)(3,3 ) ( 5,1)(3,0 ) ( 3,0.5)(4,0 )
let us remark the following easy to check facts : * @xmath38 is the @xmath1-cycle graph .
* @xmath9 is the complete graph @xmath39 .
* @xmath40 is @xmath41 the complement of a perfect matching of the edges in a complete graph @xmath39 .
* @xmath42 is @xmath43 the complement of a hamiltonian cycle in a complete graph @xmath44 .
the eigenvalues of @xmath0 can be computed by terms of a finite fourier transform , it turns out that if @xmath45 denotes the @xmath46-th eigenvalue of @xmath0 then ; @xmath47 where @xmath48 thus , the energy @xmath49 for the circulant graph @xmath0 is given by the expression : @xmath50
for small values of @xmath5 , we can split the trigonometric sum defining @xmath49 into positive and negative parts : @xmath51 for each @xmath5 we have a finite number of trigonometric sums along arithmetic sequences .
those sums can be computed explicitly , by means of the following elementary lemma on trigonometric sums .
[ lem : trig_sum ] let @xmath52 be an arithmetic sequence of real numbers with @xmath53 .
the following identities hold : @xmath54 @xmath55 let us take @xmath56 .
we have @xmath57 and @xmath58 .
each sum split as the addition of two geometric sums that are explicitly computed . by undoing the same change of variables ,
we obtain the above identities . for @xmath59
we obtain a closed formula for the energy of the cycle : @xmath60 in the case @xmath61 , we take into account : @xmath62 and thus we obtain : @xmath63.\ ] ] -axis @xmath1 , from @xmath64 to @xmath65 .
@xmath66-axis @xmath67 from @xmath68 to @xmath69 .
( right ) @xmath70-axis @xmath14 , from @xmath64 to @xmath65 .
@xmath66-axis @xmath71 from @xmath72 to @xmath73.,title="fig:",width=256 ] -axis @xmath1 , from @xmath64 to @xmath65 .
@xmath66-axis @xmath67 from @xmath68 to @xmath69 .
( right ) @xmath70-axis @xmath14 , from @xmath64 to @xmath65 .
@xmath66-axis @xmath71 from @xmath72 to @xmath73.,title="fig:",width=256 ] figure [ fi : energy_2 ] illustrates the modular behavior ( mod @xmath74 and mod @xmath75 respectively ) of the energy which is easily seen in formulae and .
analogous formula , of growing complexity , may be computed for other values of @xmath5 . by means of lemma [ lem : trig_sum ]
we can also compute explicitly the energy of the graphs @xmath40 obtaining : @xmath76 @xmath77 let us recall that the graph @xmath40 is isomorphic to @xmath41 ; the graph obtained by deleting a perfect matching from a complete graph of even order @xmath78 .
it is a regular graph of degree @xmath79 .
it is well know that the energy of a regular graph of degree @xmath80 is equal or greater than @xmath81 ( see ( * ? ? ?
this trivial lower bound is reached for the complete graph @xmath82 .
the family @xmath41 gives us another example of regular graphs minimizing energy within each family of regular graphs of fixed even degree .
let us consider the the graph @xmath29 obtained by deleting the edges of a perfect matching of a complete graph of index @xmath30 .
* @xmath83 and thus @xmath29 is non - hyperenergetic . *
@xmath29 minimizes the energy in the family of regular graphs of degree @xmath31 .
a direct consequence of theorem 2 in @xcite is that the limit @xmath84 exists and it is bigger than @xmath85 .
here we compute it explicitly . for each @xmath86 the limit :
@xmath87 has value : @xmath88 note that the integral @xmath89 is the @xmath90-norm of @xmath91 where @xmath92 is the dirichlet kernel . from the triangular inequality
we obtain : @xmath93 where @xmath94 is the lebesgue constant ( see @xcite page 67 ) .
we may evaluate analytically integral .
equation @xmath95 can be solved analytically .
it yields @xmath96 between @xmath2 and @xmath97 we obtain the partition : @xmath98 the function @xmath99 is positive in the first interval , negative in the second interval , and so on .
this allows us to evaluate the integral obtaining , @xmath100 and finally by application of lemma [ lem : trig_sum ] : @xmath101 & \mbox { if $ r$ odd , } \\
\displaystyle \frac{2}{\pi } \sum_{k=1}^r \frac{1}{k}\left [ \frac{1-(-1)^k}{\sin \left(\frac{k\pi}{r+1}\right ) } + \frac{\cos\left(\frac{k \pi}{r}\right)- \cos\left(\frac{(r+1 ) k \pi}{r}\right)}{\sin \left(\frac{k\pi}{r}\right ) } \right ] & \mbox { if $ r$ even . } \end{cases}\ ] ] the first values can be computed explicitly obtaining , @xmath102 and some approximate values are : @xmath103 in particular we have that @xmath104 for @xmath105 and @xmath106 for @xmath107 .
it follows the following result .
[ th : final ] the following statements hold : * for @xmath7 there is a finite number of hyperenergetic graphs of the form @xmath0 .
* for each @xmath107 there is a finite number on non - hyperenergetic graphs of the form @xmath0 .
an example is given by @xmath40 .
-axis @xmath1 , from @xmath108 to @xmath109 .
@xmath66-axis @xmath110 from @xmath111 to @xmath112 .
the horizontal line corresponds to @xmath113 .
dots over the horizontal line represent exceptional hyperenergetic graphs in the family @xmath114 .
( right ) @xmath70-axis @xmath1 , from @xmath115 to @xmath65 .
@xmath66-axis @xmath116 from @xmath117 to @xmath118 .
the horizontal line corresponds to @xmath113 .
dots over the horizontal line represent exceptional hyperenergetic graphs in the family @xmath119.,title="fig:",width=256 ] -axis @xmath1 , from @xmath108 to @xmath109 .
@xmath66-axis @xmath110 from @xmath111 to @xmath112 .
the horizontal line corresponds to @xmath113 .
dots over the horizontal line represent exceptional hyperenergetic graphs in the family @xmath114 .
( right ) @xmath70-axis @xmath1 , from @xmath115 to @xmath65 .
@xmath66-axis @xmath116 from @xmath117 to @xmath118 .
the horizontal line corresponds to @xmath113 .
dots over the horizontal line represent exceptional hyperenergetic graphs in the family @xmath119.,title="fig:",width=256 ] a numerical exploration ( see fig .
[ figura_g4n ] ) allows us to find all the hyperenergetic graphs of the form @xmath0 with @xmath7 . 1 .
there is no hyperenergetic graph of the form @xmath38 or @xmath120 .
2 . there are five hyperenergectic graphs of the form @xmath114 with @xmath121 .
3 . there is much bigger but finite family of hyperenergetic graphs of the form @xmath119 , ilustrated by fig .
[ figura_g4n ] ( right ) . with respect to theorem [ th : final ] ( b )
, we conjecture that the only non - hyperenergetic graph of the form @xmath0 with @xmath107 is the graph @xmath40 .
we want to thank juan pablo rada for introducing us to the topic of graph energy , and sharing his experience with us .
the first author acknowledges universidad nacional de colombia research grant hermes-27984 .
the second author acknowledges the support of universidad de antioquia . | @xmath11 graph with @xmath1 vertices eigenvalues @xmath12 energy defined sum absolute values eigenvalues @xmath13 introduced by gutman 1978 details refer to @xcite literature @xmath14-vertex graph @xmath15 has eigenvalues @xmath16 @xmath17 ( @xmath18 times ) @xmath19 complete graph @xmath15 largest energy @xmath14-vertex graphs @xmath11 @xmath20 equality @xmath21 counterexamples conjecture false @xcite @xmath14-vertex graph @xmath11 energy satisfies @xmath22 graphs introduced @xcite molecular chemistry construction hyperenergetic graphs walikar et al line graph of @xmath15 @xmath23 hyperenergetic other recent results on hyperenergetic graphs @xcite results hyperenergetic circulant graphs @xcite consider family circulant graphs @xmath1 @xmath5 with @xmath24 define circulant graph @xmath0 with vertices @xmath25 edge between @xmath26 @xmath14 inequation @xmath27 solution @xmath28 fig . closed formula for energy circulant graph @xmath0formula energy graph @xmath29 deleting edges @xmath30 non - hyperenegetic @xmath29 minimal energy over regular graphs @xmath31 bounds expressions @xmath32 @xmath33 finite hyperenergetic graphs @xmath34 finite non - hyperenergetic graphs -1,-1)(8,4)(2,2 ) 2,1 ) 5,2 ) 5,1 ) 4,3 ) 4,0 ) 3,0 ) 2,1.5)@xmath35 ( 3.5,3)@xmath36 2.5,2.5)@xmath37 2.5,0.5) 4,3)(5,2)(5,1)(4,0)(3,0 ) 4,3)(5,1 ) 5,2)(4,0 ) 5,2)(3,3 ) 5,1)(3,0 ) 3,0.5)(4,0 @xmath38 @xmath1-cycle graph @xmath9 complete graph @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 matching edges @xmath39 @xmath42 @xmath43 hamiltonian cycle graph @xmath44eigenvalues @xmath0 computed finite fourier transform @xmath45 @xmath46-th eigenvalue @xmath47 @xmath48 energy @xmath49 circulant graph @xmath0 expression @xmath50 small values @xmath5 split trigonometric sum @xmath49 positive negative parts @xmath51 @xmath5 finite trigonometric sums arithmetic sequences sums computed elementary lemma trigonometric sums @xmath52 arithmetic sequence real numbers @xmath53 identities @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 each sum split addition two geometric sums computed undoing change variables obtain identities @xmath59 closed formula energy cycle @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 obtain @xmath63 -axis @xmath1 @xmath64 to @xmath65 @xmath66-axis @xmath67 @xmath68 to @xmath69 @xmath70-axis @xmath14 to-axis @xmath71 to @xmath73 -axis @xmath1 @xmath64 to @xmath66-axis @xmath67 @xmath68 to @xmath69@xmath70-axis @xmath14 to @xmath66-axis @xmath71 to figure energy_2 illustrates modular behavior mod @xmath74 and @xmath75 of energy seen in formulae analogous formula computed for values @xmath5 lemma trig_sum compute energy of graphs @xmath40 @xmath76 @xmath77 graph @xmath40 isomorphic to @xmath41 graph obtained by deleting perfect matching from graph @xmath78 regular graph degree @xmath79 energy of regular graph @xmath80 equal or greater than @xmath81 lower bound reached for complete graph @xmath82 family @xmath41 regular graphs minimizing energy graph @xmath29 deleting edges perfect matching graph @xmath30 @xmath83 @xmath29 non - hyperenergetic @xmath29 minimizes energy in family regular graphs degree @xmath31 consequence theorem 2 limit @xmath84 exists bigger than @xmath85 compute explicitly each @xmath86 limit : @xmath87 value : @xmath88 integral @xmath89 is @xmath90-norm of @xmath91 @xmath92 dirichlet kerneltriangular inequality obtain @xmath93 @xmath94 lebesgue constant see @xcite page 67 evaluate analytically integral equation @xmath95 solved analytically yields @xmath96 @xmath2 @xmath97 obtain partition @xmath98 function @xmath99 positive first interval negative second interval evaluate integral obtaining @xmath100 application lemma trig_sum @xmath101 \mbox { if $ r$ odd \frac{2}{\pi } \sum_{k=1}^r \frac{1}{k}\left\frac{1-(-1)^k}{\frac{k\pi}{r+1}\right ){\left\right\mbox { if $ r$ even first values computed @xmath102 approximate values @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 result statements hold @xmath7 finite number hyperenergetic graphs form @xmath0 @xmath107 finite number non - hyperenergetic graphs form @xmath0 example @xmath40 -axis @xmath1 @xmath108 to @xmath109@xmath66-axis @xmath110 to horizontal line corresponds @xmath113 dots represent hyperenergetic graphs @xmath114 @xmath70-axis @xmath1 @xmath115 to @xmath66-axis @xmath116 to horizontal line corresponds @xmath113 dots represent hyperenergetic @xmath119 -axis @xmath1 @xmath108 to @xmath109 @xmath66-axis @xmath110 to horizontal line corresponds @xmath113 dots represent hyperenergetic graphs @xmath114 @xmath70-axis @xmath1 @xmath115 to @xmath65 @xmath66-axis @xmath116 to @xmath118 horizontal line corresponds @xmath113 dots represent hyperenergetic graphs @xmath119 numerical exploration all hyperenergetic graphs @xmath0 with @xmath7 no hyperenergetic graph @xmath38 or @xmath120 five hyperenergectic graphs @xmath114 with @xmath121 finite family hyperenergetic graphs @xmath119 ilustrated fig .theorem final ] conjecture non - hyperenergetic graph @xmath0 @xmath107 graph @xmath40 thank juan pablo rada introducing graph energy sharing experience first author acknowledges universidad nacional colombia grant-27984 second author support universidad de antioquia | 0.425627 | 2,704 | 1,514 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,080 | we propose a simple pedagogical way of introducing the euler - maclaurin summation formula in an undergraduate course on statistical mechanics .
we put forward two alternative routes : the first one is the simplest and yields the first two terms of the expansion .
the second one is somewhat more elaborate and takes into account all the correction terms .
we apply both to the calculation of the simplest one - particle canonical partition functions for the translational , vibrational and rotational degrees of freedom . | in statistical mechanics the thermodynamic functions are given in terms of the logarithm of the partition function and its derivatives with respect to volume , temperature , etc .
the mathematical expression of the canonical partition function is an infinite sum over all the states of the system or , under some simplifying assumptions , the states of the individual particles.@xcite some of these infinite sums are commonly calculated approximately by means of the euler - maclaurin summation formula@xcite and most textbooks simply show how to apply it to the cases of interest.@xcite a rigorous derivation of the summation formula may be rather too demanding for inexperienced students and one avoids it in introductory courses on statistical thermodynamics or statistical mechanics .
there is a relatively simple way of deriving the summation formula by means of operator methods@xcite but it also requires some kind of mathematical expertise that students of introductory courses may not posses .
however , the students may feel more confident and confortable if they are shown how to carry out such calculations by means of mathematical methods that they have already learned in a first course on mathematical analysis . in an introductory undergraduate course
we show how to obtain the first two terms of the euler - maclaurin summation formula in an extremely simple way that only requires the students to be familiar with the taylor expansion .
the aim of this paper is to put forward this approach that we deem suitable for pedagogical purposes . in section [ sec : simple_appro ]
we outline the method and apply it to some simple examples in section [ sec : examples ] .
if we decide to show the students how to obtain terms of higher order this simple approach results to be rather cumbersome .
for that reason , in section [ sec : systematic ] we show how to derive the full summation formula by a relatively minor change of strategy that requires some additional mathematical skills .
the reader may choose one or another approach depending on the level of the course .
finally , in section [ sec : conclusions ] we summarize the results and draw conclusions .
the simplest canonical partition functions in statistical mechanics can be expressed as sums of the form @xmath0 where @xmath1 should tend to zero sufficiently fast when @xmath2 because , otherwise , the sum does not converge . in most cases
one can not obtain this sum in closed form and therefore resorts to some kind of approximation valid under certain conditions ; for example , sufficiently high temperature . in order to derive such an approach
we define @xmath3 that satisfies @xmath4 and @xmath5 substituting the taylor expansion @xmath6 for @xmath7 into ( [ eq : s(x)_prop2 ] ) we obtain , after some rearrangement , @xmath8 if we integrate this expression between @xmath9 and @xmath10 and take into account that @xmath11 and all its derivatives vanish at the upper limit we have @xmath12 that can be solved iteratively . in the first step
we omit the derivatives of @xmath11 so that this function is approximately given by @xmath11 @xmath13 .
if we substitute this approximate result into the right - hand side of ( [ eq : s(x)_iter ] ) we have @xmath14 thus , for @xmath15 we obtain a simple approximation to the sum ( [ eq : s ] ) : @xmath16 the simple method just outlined is suitable for introductory courses because it only requires basic knowlegde in mathematical analysis .
this procedure is not suitable for the systematic calculation of the corrections of higher order to the basic formula ( [ eq : s_approx_simp ] ) because it soon becomes rather cumbersome .
however , this result is suitable for most porposes in an introductory course on statistical mechanics because several partitions functions for atomic and simple molecular systems can be easily derived from it.@xcite
under some simplifying assumptions that we will not discuss in this paper statistical mechanics tell us how to express the thermodynamic functions of atomic and molecular systems in terms of one - particle partition functions of the form@xcite @xmath17 where @xmath18 is the volume of the container , @xmath19 the absolute temperature , @xmath20 the @xmath21-th energy level ( assumed to be @xmath22-fold degenerate ) of the particle and @xmath23 the boltzman constant .
let us first consider a particle of mass @xmath24 in a one - dimensional box of length @xmath25 with impenetrable walls which is the starting point for the calculation of the thermodynamic properties of an ideal monoatomic gas.@xcite if the particle has no internal structure its spectrum is only given by the translational degree of freedom : @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the planck constant @xmath28 divided @xmath29 and @xmath30 . upon defining @xmath31 @xmath32
the partition function @xmath33 reads @xmath34 and the approximation ( [ eq : s_approx_simp ] ) yields @xmath35 this approximate expression is accurate for sufficiently small values of @xmath36 or , equivalently , when the thermal de broglie wavelength @xmath37 is much smaller than the box length @xmath25.@xcite the addition of corrections of higher order commonly improves the result of the approximate partition function , but in this case all of them vanish.@xcite figure [ fig : pb ] shows that this approximate expression becomes increasingly more accurate as @xmath36 decreases . the spectrum of a one - dimensional harmonic oscillator is given by @xmath38 where @xmath39 is the frequency of the oscillation and @xmath30 .
the partition function for this degree of freedom is given by @xmath40 where @xmath41 .
in this case the sum @xmath42 is a geometric series that can be calculated exactly and therefore we can derive its small-@xmath36 expansion in a straightforward way : @xmath43 if we define the vibrational temperature @xmath44 then @xmath45 and the euler - maclaurin formula is a good approximation when @xmath46 . the approximate expression ( [ eq : s_approx_simp ] )
yields the first two terms of this series exactly .
the last example is the partition function for a rigid rotor with moment of inertia @xmath47 . in this case , every energy level @xmath48 is @xmath49-fold degenerate and the partition function for the rotational degree of freedom is given by @xmath50 where @xmath51
. the approximate expression ( [ eq : s_approx_simp ] ) yields @xmath52 that is accurate enough if @xmath36 is sufficently small as shown in figure [ fig : rr ] .
it is custommary to define the rotational temperature @xmath53@xcite so that @xmath54 when @xmath55 .
it is worth mentioning that the @xmath36-independent term in equation ( [ eq : s_rr_appro1 ] ) is not exact as shown in the following section .
if we decide to show the students how to obtain expression of higher order it is convenient to proceed in a different way .
if we write the taylor expansion discussed in section [ sec : simple_appro ] as @xmath56 where @xmath57 is the @xmath58-th derivative of @xmath11 with respect to @xmath9 , then equation ( [ eq : s(x)_iter ] ) reads @xmath59 where @xmath60 . instead of trying to solve equation ( [ eq : s(x)_iter2 ] ) iteratively
we propose a solution of the form @xmath61 where @xmath62 . in order to obtain the coefficients
@xmath63 we substitute ( [ eq : s(x)_ansatz ] ) into ( [ eq : s(x)_iter2 ] ) and compare the coefficients of @xmath64 in the left- and right - hand sides ; the result is @xmath65 we thus have @xmath66 and @xmath67 straightforward inspection of the first coefficients @xmath68 @xmath69 suggests that @xmath70 vanish for all @xmath71 . in order to prove this conjecture we consider the function @xmath72 that satisfies @xmath73 if we substitute the taylor expansion @xmath74 into equation ( [ eq : u(x)-u(-x ) ] ) we conclude that @xmath75 for all @xmath71 . if we now expand @xmath76 in a taylor series about @xmath15 and compare the coefficients of @xmath77 in the left- and right - hand sides of the resulting equation we obtain a recurrence relation for the coefficients @xmath78 that is identical with equation ( [ eq : a_n_rec ] ) for the coefficients @xmath68 .
we thus conclude that @xmath79 for all @xmath21
. therefore , equation ( [ eq : s_appro_gen1 ] ) reduces to @xmath80 it is worth noting that the coefficients @xmath81 are related to the brillouin numbers @xmath82@xcite in the following way : @xmath83 .
the operator method leads to this result in a more straightforward way and is also more convenient for the discussion of the radius of convergence of the series.@xcite however , we do not discuss it here because it requires the introduction of functions of operators that may not be suitable for an undergraduate course .
let us apply this more accurate approach to the examples discussed in section [ sec : examples ] .
as pointed out in that section nothing can be done with the particle in a box because all the corrections of higher order vanish .
this surprising result can be explained very easily and applies to all the sums in which @xmath84 because @xmath85 and @xmath86 .
a more rigorous analysis of such problems , based on the poisson summation formula , can be found eslewhere.@xcite the harmonic oscillator is a suitable simple example for testing the summation formula ( [ eq : s_appro_gen2 ] ) because we can calculate the exact expansion as shown in equation ( [ eq : s_exact_exp ] ) . in this case
every new term added to the summation formula ( [ eq : s_appro_gen2 ] ) yields one more term of the small-@xmath36 series ( [ eq : s_exact_exp ] ) as one may easily verify .
the application of the summation formula ( [ eq : s_appro_gen2 ] ) to the partition function for the rigid rotor should be carried out with care .
the reason is that @xmath87 , where @xmath88 is a polynomial function of @xmath36 of degree @xmath89 and @xmath90
. therefore , the summation formula that includes all the terms through @xmath91 only yields the small-@xmath36 series correctly through degree @xmath92 . for this reason the simple expression ( [ eq : s_approx_simp ] ) does not yield the correct @xmath36-independent term that receives contributions from @xmath93 and @xmath94 .
the expansion accurate to @xmath95 is easily shown to be @xmath96 if we add all the terms trough @xmath97 in the summation formula ( [ eq : s_appro_gen2 ] ) as argued above . since
this series does not converge@xcite one should truncate it before the terms start to increase .
as stated in the introduction we show the students the simple method developed in section [ sec : simple_appro ] because it is sufficient for the purposes of our course .
however , if a motivated student wants to learn how to obtain the corrections of greater order that appear in some of the available texbooks on statistical mechanics then one can suggest him or her to try the systematic approach of section [ sec : systematic ] or even the operator method.@xcite in our opinion the present way of deriving the euler - maclaurin summation formula for statistical mechanics applications is more convenient for pedagogical purposes than the traditional one that appears in most textbooks on mathematics or numerical analysis.@xcite such traditional approaches are certainly more rigorous and general but require the students to be more experienced in mathematics . in passing ,
it is worth mentioning that the summation formula given by equations ( [ eq : a_n_rec ] ) and ( [ eq : s_appro_gen2 ] ) is suitable for motivating the students to resort to a computer algebra system . in this way they bypass the tedious algebraic manipulation of the equations that is necessary for the calculation of contributions of large order like those in equation ( [ eq : s_rr_em ] ) and practise programming in any of such useful languages . | in statistical mechanics thermodynamic functions logarithm of partition function derivatives with volume temperature mathematical expression of canonical partition function is infinite sum over states system or individual particles infinite sums calculated euler - maclaurin summation formula textbooks show apply to cases of interest rigorous derivation summation formula demanding for inexperienced students in introductory courses on statistical thermodynamics mechanics simple way deriving summation formula operator methods requires mathematical expertise introductory courses students feel confident if calculations by mathematical methods learned in first course mathematical analysis introductory undergraduate course obtain first two terms of euler - maclaurin summation formula simple requires familiar with taylor expansion aim paper put this approach suitable for pedagogical purposes in section [ sec simple_appro ] outline method apply to simple examples if obtain terms higher order simple approach cumbersome in section [ sec : systematic ] show derive full summation formula by minor change of strategy requires additional mathematical skills reader may choose one or approach depending on level course in section [ conclusions ] summarize results draw conclusionspartition functions in statistical mechanics expressed as sums @xmath0 @xmath1 zero fast @xmath2 sum converge obtain sum in closed form resorts to approximation under conditions high temperature define @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 substituting expansion @xmath6 for @xmath7 into [ eq : s(x)_prop2 ] ) @xmath8 integrate expression between @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 derivatives vanish at upper limit have @xmath12 solved iteratively omit derivatives of @xmath11 function given by @xmath11 @xmath13 substitute result into side of ( [ eq : s(x)_iter ] ) @xmath14 for @xmath15 simple approximation to sum ( [ eq : s ] ) : @xmath16 method suitable for introductory courses basic mathematical analysis not suitable for systematic calculation corrections higher order basic formula cumbersome result suitable for introductory course statistical mechanics partitions functions for atomic molecular systems derived@xcite assumptions statistical mechanics express thermodynamic functions atomic molecular systems one - particle partition functions @xmath17 volume container absolute temperature-th energy level particle boltzman constant consider particle mass @xmath24 in one - dimensional box @xmath25 with impenetrable walls starting point for calculation thermodynamic properties ideal monoatomic gas particle no internal structure spectrum given by translational degree freedom @xmath26 planck constant @xmath28 divided @xmath29 @xmath30 defining @xmath31 partition function @xmath33 reads @xmath34 approximation yields @xmath35 accurate for small values of @xmath36 or thermal de broglie wavelength @xmath37 smaller than box length @xmath25 addition corrections higher order improves result approximate partition function all vanish figure approximate expression accurate as @xmath36 decreases spectrum of one - dimensional harmonic oscillator by @xmath38 frequency oscillation @xmath30 partition function for freedom by @xmath40 @xmath41sum @xmath42 geometric series calculated derive small-@xmath36 expansion @xmath43 define vibrational temperature @xmath44 @xmath45 euler - maclaurin formula good approximation @xmath46 approximate expression s_approx_simp yields first two terms series last example partition function for rigid rotor with moment inertia @xmath47 energy level @xmath48 @xmath49-fold degenerate partition function rotational degree freedom @xmath50 @xmath51 approximate expression s_approx_simp yields @xmath52 accurate if @xmath36 small figure define rotational temperature @xmath53@xcite @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath36-independent term in equation eq : s_rr_appro1 not exact show students obtain expression higher order proceed different way write taylor expansion as @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58-th derivative of @xmath11 @xmath9 equation ( eq : s(x)_iter ] ) reads @xmath59 where @xmath60 equation s(x)_iter2 propose solution @xmath61 where @xmath62 obtain coefficients @xmath63 substitute eq : s(x)_ansatz ] into eq : s(x)_iter2 ] compare coefficients @xmath64 left right sides result @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 first coefficients @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 vanish @xmath71 prove conjecture consider function @xmath72 satisfies @xmath73 substitute taylor expansion @xmath74 into equation eq : u(x)-u(-x ) conclude @xmath75 for @xmath71 expand @xmath76 taylor series @xmath15 compare coefficients @xmath77 left right sides obtain recurrence relation coefficients @xmath78 identical with equation eq : a_n_rec ] ) coefficients @xmath68 conclude @xmath79 for @xmath21 equation ( [ eq : s_appro_gen1 ] reduces to @xmath80 coefficients @xmath81 related brillouin numbers @xmath82@xcite @xmath83 operator method leads result convenient discussion radius convergence series. requires introduction functions operators apply accurate approach examples section ] nothing done particle in box corrections higher order vanishsurprising result explained applies to sums @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 rigorous analysis based on poisson summation formula found eslewhere. harmonic oscillator suitable example for testing summation formula s_appro_gen2 calculate exact expansion in equation s_exact_exp every new term added to summation formula yields one more term of small-@xmath36 series_exp application summation formula to partition function for rigid rotor care @xmath87 @xmath88 polynomial function of @xmath36 @xmath89 @xmath90 summation formula terms through @xmath91 yields small-@xmath36 series through @xmath92 simple expression ( [ eq : s_approx_simp ] yield correct @xmath36-independent term receives contributions from @xmath93 @xmath94 expansion accurate to @xmath95 shown be @xmath96 if add all terms trough @xmath97 in summation formula s_appro_gen2 series not converge should truncate before terms increase show students simple method in section [ sec : simple_appro ] sufficient for purposes courseif motivated student corrections greater order in texbooks on statistical mechanics suggest try systematic approach of or operator method present way deriving euler - maclaurin summation formula for statistical mechanics applications more convenient for pedagogical than traditional one in most textbooks on mathematics numerical analysis traditional approaches rigorous require students experienced in mathematics summation formula by equations ( [ eq : a_n_rec ] and eq : s_appro_gen2 ] ) suitable for motivating students computer algebra system they bypass tedious algebraic manipulation for calculation of contributions large order practise programming in useful languages | 0.435153 | 2,644 | 1,360 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,107 | recent data from atic , cream and pamela revealed that the energy spectra of cosmic ray ( cr ) nuclei above 100 gev / nucleon experience a remarkable hardening with increasing energy .
this effect can not be recovered by the conventional descriptions of cr acceleration and diffusive propagation processes . using analytical calculations ,
i show that the hardening effect can be consequence of a spatial change of the cr diffusion properties in different regions of the galaxy .
i discuss the implications of this scenario for the main cr observables and its connections with the open issues of the cr physics . | understanding the origin of the cosmic ray ( cr ) energy spectrum is central to astrophysics and has long been the focus of intensive study .
the spectrum of cr nuclei at @xmath010@xmath110@xmath2gev / nucleon is thought to be the result of diffusive shock acceleration ( dsa ) mechanisms in supernova remnants ( snr ) , followed by diffusive propagation in the interstellar medium ( ism ) @xcite .
the conventional descriptions predict source spectra such as @xmath3 for primary nuclei ( _ e.g. _ , , ) which are steepened as @xmath4 by diffusion .
the data constrain @xmath52.7 ( depending on the element ) and @xmath60.20.7 , whereby @xmath72.02.5 . in dsa calculations ,
the source spectral slope should be @xmath82.2 , which implies @xmath90.5 .
on the other hand , large values for @xmath10 are at odds with the anisotropy observations at tev energies , which favor @xmath110.3 . on top of that , recent experiments atic-2 , cream , and pamela , reported a remarkable spectral hardening at energies above @xmath0100gev / nucleon which can not be explained by conventional mechanisms @xcite .
proposed explanations of this effect deal with acceleration mechanisms @xcite , nearby snrs @xcite or multi - source populations @xcite .
i propose here that the hardening originates from a spatial change of the cr diffusion properties in the different regions of the galactic halo .
the key hypotesis is that the diffusion coefficient @xmath12 is not separable into energy and space terms as usually assumed .
as i will show , this hypotesis leads to a pronounced change in slope for the energy spectra of cr nuclei at earth , giving a good description of the present data .
remarkably , the model proposed here has also positive impacts on several open problems in the cr acceleration / propagation physics .
i use a one - dimensional inhomogeneus diffusion model for cr transport and interactions @xcite .
the galaxy is modeled to be a disc ( half - thickness @xmath13100pc ) containing the gas ( number density @xmath141@xmath15 ) and the cr sources .
the disc is surrounded by a diffusive halo ( half - thickness @xmath165kpc ) with zero matter density . for each stable cr nucleus , the transport equation is : @xmath17 where @xmath18 is its number density as function of the @xmath19-coordinate , @xmath20 is the position - dependent diffusion coefficient and @xmath21 is the destruction rate in the ism at velocity @xmath22 and cross section @xmath23 .
the source term @xmath24 is split into a primary term @xmath25 , from snrs , and a secondary production term @xmath26 , from spallation of heavier ( @xmath27 ) nuclei with rate @xmath28 .
the quantities @xmath29 , @xmath12 , @xmath24 and @xmath30 depend on energy too .
equation[eq::transport1d ] can be solved in steady - state conditions ( @xmath31 ) with the boundary conditions @xmath32 @xcite . for each cr nucleus
, the differential energy spectrum is given by : @xmath33 \,,\ ] ] where @xmath34@xmath35@xmath36 , @xmath37 , and @xmath38@xmath35@xmath39 . in cr propagation studies ,
the diffusion coefficient is usually assumed to be separable as @xmath40 ( in homogeneus models @xmath411 , whereby @xmath42 ) . in these models ,
the functions @xmath43 and @xmath44 are independent on energy , so that the predictions at earth ( @xmath19@xmath45@xmath46 ) are spectrally uninfluenced by the choice of @xmath47 .
conversely , i employ a non - separable @xmath48 , which reflects the existence of different cr transport properties in the propagation volume , depending on the nature and scale distribution of the magnetic - field irregularities .
in fact , while snr explosions may generate large irregularities in the region near the galactic plane , the situation in the outer halo is different because that medium is undisturbed by snrs . from these considerations , the authors of ref .
@xcite found that the turbulence spectrum in the halo should be flatter than that in the galactic plane .
this implies a strong latitudinal dependence for the parameter @xmath10 , which suggests spatial variations of the cr energy spectra .
noticeably , new data reported by _
fermi_/lat on the diffuse @xmath49-ray emission at @xmath010100gev of energy seem to support these suggestions : the @xmath49-ray spectra observed near the galactic plane ( latitude @xmath508@xmath51 ) are found to be harder than those at higher latitudes @xcite . following the above arguments ,
i adopt a simple _ two - halo model _ consisting in two diffusive zones .
the _ inner halo _ is taken to surround the disk for a typical size @xmath52 of a few hundred pc ( @xmath530.1 ) .
its medium properties are influenced by snrs , which produce a steep turbulence spectrum in terms of energy density per wave number , @xmath54 , presumably close to the kolmogorov regime @xmath551/3 .
the _ outer halo _ represents a wider region , @xmath56 , which is undisturbed by snrs .
its turbulence spectrum is driven by crs and should be flatter .
for instance , crs with rigidity spectrum @xmath57 ( where @xmath58 ) excite turbulent modes of wave - numbers @xmath59 , giving a spectrum @xmath0@xmath60 , where @xmath61 is of the order of the unity .
this situation can be realized by a rigidity dependent diffusion coefficient of the type @xmath62 where @xmath630.04kpc / myr specifies its normalization at the reference rigidity @xmath645gv . for @xmath65 , the diffusion coefficient of eq.[eq::twohalodiffcoeff ]
produces a higher cr confinement in the inner halo ( with @xmath551/3 ) , whereas the outer halo ( with @xmath660.5 1 ) represents a _ reservoir _ from which crs leak out rapidly and can re - enter the inner halo .
the non - separability of @xmath12 has a remarkable consequence on the model predictions at @xmath67 .
it can be understood if one neglects the term @xmath30 and takes a source term @xmath68 . from eq.[eq::solutionvsz ] and using eq.[eq::twohalodiffcoeff ] , one finds @xmath69 which describes the cr spectrum as a result of two components .
its differential log - slope as a function of rigidity reads @xmath70 which shows a clear transition between two regimes . in practice the low - energy regime ( @xmath71 )
is never reached due to spallation , that becomes relevant and even dominant over escape ( @xmath72 ) . in this case
the log - slope is better approximated by @xmath73 @xcite .
the hard high - energy regime ( @xmath74 ) is determined by the diffusion properties of the inner halo only . in this limit
one has @xmath75 .
the effect vanishes at all rigidities when passing to the homogeneus limit of @xmath76 ( one - halo ) or @xmath77 ( identical halos ) , where one recovers the usual relation @xmath78 . from eq.[eq::solutionvsz ] , it can be seen that the intensity of the harder component diminishes gradually with increasing @xmath79 , _
i.e. _ , the cr spectra at high energies are steeper in the outer halo , as suggested by the new
_ fermi_/lat data . .
, title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] figure[fig::ccresults ] shows the and spectra at earth , from eq.[eq::solutionvsz ] , at kinetic energies above 10gev .
the implementation of the model follows refs.@xcite .
the source spectra are taken as @xmath80 , with @xmath812.3 for @xmath82 and @xmath812.16 for @xcite .
the two halos are defined by @xmath165kpc and @xmath830.5kpc .
a kolmogorov - type diffusion is adopted for the inner halo ( @xmath841/3 ) , while @xmath85 is taken as 0.55 , consistently with ref.@xcite .
results from the two - halo model ( solid lines ) are compared with those from the homogeneus model ( dashed lines ) , which uses @xmath840.6 , and with recent cr data .
below @xmath010gev / nucleon , the solar modulation is apparent and it is described using a _ force - field _ modulation potential @xmath86400mv @xcite . note that my model may be inadequate in this energy region due to approximations .
remarkably , my model reproduce well the observed changes in slope at @xmath87100gev , in good agreement with the trend indicated by the data .
it should be noted , however , that the sharp spectral structures suggested by the pamela data at @xmath0300gev can not be recovered .
figure[fig::ccresults]c shows the mean logarithmic mass , @xmath88 , which is described well by the two - halo model .
figure[fig::ccresults]d shows the ratio from the two - halo model , which is predicted to harden as @xmath89 , while its low - energy behavior is similar to that of the homogeneus model ( with @xmath900.6 in the whole halo ) .
interestingly , a slight flattening for the ratio is also suggested by recent data , _
e.g. _ , from tracer . a multi - channel study of the data will allow to resolutely test these features .
the ratio hardening is also connected with the global large - scale anisotropy amplitude , which should increases as @xmath91 @xcite .
thus , the two - halo model predicts a gradual flattening of @xmath92 , as indicated by the present data .
it is also interesting noticing that the anisotropy may be furtherly reduced at all energies if one accounts for a proper radial dependence for @xmath12 @xcite . in summary ,
the model i proposed is potentially able to reconcile a weak energy dependent of the anisotropy amplitude ( as suggested by observations ) with relatively hard source spectra @xmath932.2 ( as preferred by the dsa theory ) , giving good fits to the ratio .
i recall that plain diffusion models employ @xmath932.2 and @xmath940.5 in the whole halo ( which gives a too strong energy dependence for @xmath92 ) , whereas diffusive - reacceleration models use @xmath932.4 and @xmath941/3 ( which are too challenging for the dsa and require strong reacceleration to match the data ) .
i have shown that the spectral hardening observed in crs may be consequence of a galactic diffusion coefficient that is not separable in energy and space terms . from the model presented here ,
the hardening arises naturally as a local effect and vanishes gradually in the outer halo , where the cr spectra are also predicted to be steeper .
this effect must be experienced by all cr nuclei as well as by secondary - to - primary ratios .
recent data from _ fermi_/lat and tracer seem to support this scenario , but the change in slope predicted by this model is more gradual than that suggested by pamela data .
all these features can be tested with the data forthcoming by , so that the present model will be discriminated against other interpretations .
this scenario has an interesting impact on the cr physics .
as shown , a kolmogorov diffusion for the inner halo ( @xmath551/3 ) is consistent with relatively hard source spectra ( @xmath72.2 ) , giving good descriptions of both the ratio and the high - energy trend of the anisotropy amplitude .
+ + i acknowledge the support of the _ italian space agency _ under contract asi - infn i/075/09/0 . | origin cosmic ray cr energy spectrum central to astrophysics focus study spectrum cr nuclei at @xmath010 / nucleon of diffusive shock acceleration supernova remnants diffusive propagation interstellar medium @xcite conventional descriptions predict source spectra @xmath3 for primary nuclei steepened @xmath4 by diffusion data constrain @xmath52.7 @xmath60.20.7 @xmath72.02.5 calculations source spectral slope @xmath82.2 implies @xmath90.5 large values for @xmath10 odds with anisotropy observations energies favor @xmath110.3 experiments reported spectral hardening at energies above @xmath0100gev / nucleon not explained by conventional mechanisms proposed explanations acceleration mechanisms nearby snrs multi - source populations hardening originates from spatial change cr diffusion properties in regions galactic halo hypotesis diffusion coefficient @xmath12 not separable into energy space terms hypotesis leads to change in slope energy spectra cr nuclei at earth model proposed impacts problems cr acceleration / propagation physicsuse one - dimensional diffusion model for cr transport interactions galaxy disc half - thickness @xmath13100pc containing gas density @xmath141@xmath15 cr sources surrounded by diffusive halo - @xmath165kpc zero matter density each stable cr nucleus transport equation is @xmath17 @xmath18 number density @xmath19-coordinate position - dependent diffusion coefficient destruction rate at velocity cross section source term @xmath24 split into primary term @xmath25 from snrs secondary production term @xmath26 from spallation of heavier nuclei quantities @xmath29 depend on energy equation:transport1d ] solved in steady - state conditions @xmath31 boundary conditions @xmath32 @xcite each cr nucleus differential energy spectrum given by @xmath33 @xmath34 diffusion coefficient separable as @xmath40 homogeneus models functions @xmath43 @xmath44 independent on energy predictions at earth @xmath19 uninfluenced by choice of @xmath47employ non - separable @xmath48 reflects different cr transport properties in propagation volume depending on magnetic - field irregularities snr explosions generate irregularities near galactic plane outer halo different undisturbed by snrs authors of found turbulence spectrum in halo flatter than galactic plane implies strong latitudinal dependence for parameter @xmath10 suggests spatial variations of cr energy spectra new data on diffuse @xmath49-ray emission support suggestions spectra near galactic plane harder than higher latitudes adopt two - halo model two diffusive zones inner halo disk typical size @xmath52 few hundred pc medium properties influenced by snrs steep turbulence spectrum energy density per wave number close to kolmogorov regime @xmath551/3 outer halo represents wider region @xmath56 undisturbed by snrs turbulence spectrum driven by crs should be flatter crs with rigidity spectrum @xmath57 excite turbulent modes wave - numbers @xmath59 giving spectrum @xmath0@xmath60 @xmath61 unitysituation by rigidity dependent diffusion coefficient @xmath62 @xmath630.04kpc normalization at reference rigidity @xmath645gv @xmath65 diffusion coefficient.:twohalodiffcoeff produces higher cr confinement in inner halo @xmath551/3 outer halo @xmath660.5 1 reservoir crs leak re - enter inner halo non - separability of @xmath12 model predictions at @xmath67 understood @xmath30 source term @xmath68 finds @xmath69 cr spectrum result two components differential log - slope function of rigidity reads @xmath70 transition between two regimes low - energy regime @xmath71 reached due to spallation dominant over escape @xmath72 ) log - slope approximated by @xmath73 high - energy regime @xmath74 determined by diffusion properties inner halo limit @xmath75 effect vanishes at rigidities passing to homogeneus limit @xmath76 or @xmath77 recovers usual relation @xmath78 intensity of harder component diminishes with increasing @xmath79cr spectra at high energies steeper in outer halo suggested new fermi_/lat data=45.0% figure:ccresults shows spectra earth kinetic energies above 10gev model follows refs.@xcite source spectra @xmath80 @xmath812.3 @xmath82 @xmath812.16 @xcite two halos defined by @xmath165kpc @xmath830.5kpc kolmogorov - type diffusion for inner halo @xmath841/3 ) @xmath85 0.55 ref.@xcite results two - halo model compared with homogeneus model @xmath840.6 recent cr data below @xmath010gev / nucleon solar modulation apparent described force - field modulation potential @xmath86400mv @xcite model may inadequate region due approximations changes in slope at @xmath87100gev trend sharp spectral structures pamela data at @xmath0300gev not recovered figure shows mean logarithmic mass @xmath88 described two - halo modelfigure shows ratio two - halo model predicted to harden as @xmath89 low - energy behavior similar to homogeneus model @xmath900.6 in whole halo slight flattening for ratio suggested by recent data tracer multi - channel study features ratio hardening connected with global large - scale anisotropy amplitude increases as @xmath91 @xcite two - halo model predicts flattening of @xmath92 anisotropy may be reduced at all energies if proper radial dependence for @xmath12 @xcite model weak energy dependent anisotropy amplitude with hard source spectra @xmath932.2 good fits to ratio plain diffusion models employ @xmath932.2 and @xmath940.5 in whole halo strong energy dependence for @xmath92 diffusive - reacceleration models use @xmath932.4 and @xmath941/3 challenging strong reacceleration spectral hardening in crs may of galactic diffusion coefficient not separable hardening arises as local effect vanishes in outer halo cr spectra steeper effect experienced by all cr nuclei secondary - to - primary ratiosdata from fermi_/lat tracer support scenario change in slope gradual than pamela data features tested with data present model against interpretations scenario cr physics kolmogorov diffusion inner halo ( @xmath551/3 ) consistent with hard source spectra ( @xmath72.2 ) descriptions ratio high - energy trend anisotropy amplitude support italian space agency under contract asi - infn i/075/09/0 | 0.43326 | 2,701 | 1,374 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,112 | the similarity renormalization group reduces the off - shellness by driving the evolved interaction towards a diagonal band . we analyze the infrared limit and the corresponding on - shell interactions and its consequences for light nuclei . using a harmonic oscillator shell model
we obtain a tjon line @xmath0 which can be understood from a combinatorics counting of nucleon pairs and triplets in the triton and @xmath1-particle and compares favorably with realistic calculations . | nuclear physics has always been plagued with difficulties and ambiguities related to off - shellness of two - body forces and the inclusion of many - body forces deduced from the existence of equivalent hamiltonians @xcite . in a remarkable paper glckle and polyzou @xcite point out that both problems are actually intertwined since `` different off - shell extensions of two - body forces can be equivalently realized as three - body interactions '' and while `` there are no experiments measuring only three - body binding energies and phase shifts that can determine if there are no three - body forces in a three - body system '' it is still likely that `` there may be some systems for which it is possible to find a representation in which three - body forces are not needed '' .
however , triton and @xmath1-particle _ ab initio _ calculations ( see e.g. @xcite for a review ) using 2-body high quality interactions , i.e. constrained to fit nn scattering data with @xmath2 display exceedingly simple regularities , such as the tjon line , a linear correlation between the binding energies , @xmath3 within a relatively wide range of energies ( see fig . [
fig : tjon ] ) .
this suggests the onset of some scale invariance @xcite and the understanding of this correlation should also provide a credible value for the slope of the tjon line .
actually , there is much freedom in making unitary transformations keeping the two body bound and continuum spectrum while generating a wide range of three- and four - body properties .
a practical way to generate these transformations is by means of the similarity renormalization group ( srg ) proposed by gazek and wilson @xcite and independently by wegner @xcite .
the srg was first used within nuclear physics by bogner , furnstahl and perry @xcite .
we discuss how the above mentioned regularities could be understood within a srg context by analysing its infrared fixed points as we discussed previously @xcite .
the proposed scenario is free of ambiguites but indicates a predominant role played by 3-body forces even in triton and alpha nuclei .
the general srg equation corresponds to a one - parameter operator evolution dynamics given by @xcite , @xmath4,h_s ] \label{eq : srg}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and supplemented with an initial condition at @xmath5 , @xmath6 . with the exception of some few cases @xcite
these equations are mostly solved numerically @xcite , by implementing a high momentum uv cut - off , @xmath7 , and an infrared momentum cut - off @xmath8 , which reduces the analysis to the finite @xmath9-dimensional case with @xmath10 .
the isospectrality of the srg becomes evident from the trace invariance @xmath11 .
fixed points of eq .
( [ eq : srg ] ) are given by stationary solutions , @xmath12,h_s]=0 $ ] requiring @xmath13 = f(h_s)$ ] .
thus there exists a basis where both @xmath14 and @xmath15 can be simultaneously block - diagonal for different energy subspaces with dimension equal the degeneracy .
the question is what choices of @xmath14 actually drive the solution to this block - diagonal form
. we will assume the usual separation @xmath16 . for generators which have the property @xmath17 , and using cyclic properties of the trace and the invariance of @xmath18 one gets @xmath19)^\dagger ( i[g_s , h_s ] ) \le 0 \ , .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] because @xmath20 is positive but its derivative is negative the limit for @xmath21 exists and corresponds to the fixed points , i.e. any starting @xmath6 gets indeed diagonalized by the srg equations ( [ eq : srg ] ) .
thus , the srg equation are just a continuous way of diagonalizing @xmath6 .
the key point is that there are many ways to diagonalize a hamiltonian .
for an n - dimensional space there are @xmath22 possible permutations regarding the final _ ordering _ of states .
there are two complementary generator choices : @xmath23 by wegner @xcite and by gazeck and wilson @xcite @xmath24 .
more generally @xmath25 @xcite , describes a different trajectory but identical fixed points .
a choice in between is the block - diagonal generator @xmath26 in two complementary subspaces with @xmath27 @xcite . denoting by @xmath28 the hamiltonian and @xmath29 the kinetic energy eigenvalues ,
the stability analysis @xcite can be extended to show that ( @xmath30 is some suitable matrix encoding the initial @xmath6 ) @xmath31 therefore , while _ all _ @xmath22 fixed points are stable in the wegner case , in the wilson case there is a unique fixed point where the hamiltonian preserves the original ordering of states according to the kinetic energy since @xmath32 .
the emerging crossing structure will be discussed in more detail in ref .
@xcite .
the previous considerations answer the question of _ how _ similar are two given hamiltonians in terms of the frobenius scalar product , norm and induced metric , latexmath:[\ ] ] which can be interpreted in terms of the number of pairs in the @xmath45 and @xmath57 states being @xmath60 for triton and @xmath61 for @xmath51he . within this shell model scheme @xmath62 . for @xmath63
the deuteron is unbound by @xmath64 , and the binding energy obtained for the triton is @xmath65 to be compared with the exact faddeev equation result @xmath66 whereas the @xmath1-particle yields @xmath67 .
it is interesting to analyze the srg evolution from these @xmath63 values down to @xmath68 _ without _ 3-body or 4-body forces , i.e. taking @xmath48 .
one can show @xcite that for the variational shell model @xmath69 which is checked by the numerical calculation ( see fig .
[ fig : binding ] ) .
we also find linear correlations in two regimes @xmath70 if we now switch on the srg induced 3-body and 4-body forces , the difference of the on - shell result to the original value corresponds to the off - shellnes of the @xmath63 two body potential , @xmath71 neglecting @xmath72 and taking @xmath73 corresponding to 4 triplets in the @xmath1-particle ( see also @xcite ) we get @xmath74 which gives @xmath75 .
of course , one may say the @xmath50h = pnn contain 2 deuterons and @xmath51he = ppnn contains 4 deuterons , so that @xmath76 . in general , we may write @xmath77 and @xmath78 and hence @xmath79 most calculations in nuclear physics use a mean field reference state ( often ho shell model ) upon which correlations are built .
for instance , in ref . @xcite it is found that the number of _ correlated pairs _ is given by @xmath80,@xmath81 , @xmath82 and @xmath83 with @xmath84 which , from our eq .
( [ eq : pair - triplet ] ) , requires @xmath85 and then @xmath86 .
these tjon lines are plotted in fig .
[ fig : tjon ] using the different choices in eq .
( [ eq : pair - triplet ] ) and compared with several accurate calculations using realistic 2-body forces ( without 3- or 4-body forces ) @xcite . in our interpretation , the slope of the tjon line is just the number of _ correlated triplets _ in @xmath51he , @xmath87 for _ on - shell _ interactions .
these intriguing results suggest that @xmath88 and will be analysed in more detail elsewhere @xcite .
srg methods allow to reduce the two - body off - shell ambiguity _
completely _ when the infrared limit is taken and thus only _ measurable _ two - body information is needed .
the same observation applies to multi - body interactions , and while current calculations fix the three body force from the triton binding energy , more work is required to pin down how much three - body measurable input would actually be demanded within such an on - shell scheme .
however , using these ideas a simple explanation of the observed linear tjon correlations between the @xmath1-particle and triton binding energies emerges from purely combinatorial arguments . in this scheme
the srg evolved 3-body forces are large in the infrared limit whereas 4-body forces remain moderate .
s. szpigel , v.s .
timoteo , f.d.o .
duraes : similarity renormalization group evolution of chiral effective nucleon - nucleon potentials in the subtracted kernel method approach .
annals phys . *
326 * , 364 ( 2010 ) e. d. jurgenson , p. maris , r. j. furnstahl , p. navratil , w. e. ormand and j. p. vary : p - shell nuclei using similarity renormalization group evolved three - nucleon interactions , phys .
c * 87 * , 054312 ( 2013 ) k. a. wendt : similarity renormalization group evolution of three - nucleon forces in a hyperspherical momentum representation .
c * 87 * , 061001 ( 2013 ) | nuclear physics plagued with difficulties ambiguities off - shellness of two - body forces inclusion of many - body forces from equivalent hamiltonians glckle polyzou point out problems intertwined different off - shell extensions of two - body forces realized as three - body interactions no experiments measuring three - body binding energies phase shifts determine no three - body forces in three - body system likely some systems representation three - body forces not needed triton @xmath1-particle calculations using 2-body high quality interactions display simple regularities tjon line linear correlation between binding energies wide range of energies suggests onset of scale invariance understanding of correlation provide credible value for slope of tjon line freedom in making unitary transformations keeping two body bound continuum spectrum generating three- four - body properties transformations similarity renormalization group ( srg ) proposed by gazek wilson wegner srg first used by bogner furnstahl perry discuss regularities understood within srg context by analysing infrared fixed pointsproposed scenario free indicates predominant role 3-body forces in triton alpha nuclei srg equation corresponds one - parameter operator evolution dynamics @xcite @xmath4_s supplemented initial condition at @xmath5 @xmath6 equations solved numerically high momentum uv cut - off infrared momentum cut - off @xmath8 reduces analysis to finite @xmath9-dimensional case with @xmath10 isospectrality srg evident from trace invariance @xmath11 fixed points of eq given by stationary solutions @xmath12_s requiring @xmath13 = f(h_s)$ @xmath14 @xmath15 block - diagonal for energy subspaces equal question choices of @xmath14 drive solution block - diagonal form assume usual separation @xmath16 generators property @xmath17 using cyclic properties trace invariance @xmath18 @xmath19) @xmath20 positive derivative negative limit for @xmath21 exists corresponds to fixed points starting @xmath6 diagonalized by srg equations srg equation continuous way diagonalizing @xmath6key point many ways diagonalize hamiltonian n - dimensional space @xmath22 permutations final ordering states two generator choices @xmath23 wegner @xcite gazeck wilson @xmath25 @xcite different trajectory identical fixed points choice block - diagonal generator @xmath26 subspaces @xmath27 @xcite denoting @xmath28 hamiltonian @xmath29 kinetic energy eigenvalues stability analysis @xcite extended @xmath30 matrix initial @xmath6 @xmath31 @xmath22 fixed points stable wegner wilson case unique fixed point hamiltonian preserves original ordering states kinetic energy since @xmath32 emerging crossing structure discussed @xcite previous considerations similar two hamiltonians frobenius scalar product norm induced metric number pairs @xmath45 @xmath57 states @xmath60 triton @xmath61 @xmath51he @xmath63 deuteron unbound by @xmath64 binding energy triton @xmath65 compared faddeev equation result @xmath66 @xmath1-particle yields @xmath67 analyze srg evolution from @xmath63 values to @xmath68 without 3-body 4-body forces @xmath48show @xcite variational shell model @xmath69 checked numerical calculation fig . binding find linear correlations two regimes @xmath70 switch on srg induced 3-body 4-body forces difference on - shell result original value corresponds off - shellnes @xmath63 two body potential @xmath71 neglecting @xmath72 taking @xmath73 4 triplets @xmath1-particle get @xmath74 gives @xmath75 @xmath50h = pnn contain 2 deuterons @xmath51he = ppnn 4 deuterons @xmath76 write @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 calculations nuclear physics use mean field reference state ho shell model correlations built ref @xcite number correlated pairs given @xmath80@xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 requires @xmath85 @xmath86 tjon lines plotted fig . tjon choices compared with accurate calculations realistic 2-body forces @xcite slope tjon line number of correlated triplets in @xmath51he @xmath87 on - shell interactions results suggest @xmath88 analysed detail elsewhere @xcitesrg methods reduce two - body off - shell ambiguity infrared limit taken measurable two - body information needed applies multi - body interactions calculations fix three body force triton binding energy more work three - body input - shell scheme explanation linear tjon correlations @xmath1-particle triton binding energies from combinatorial arguments srg 3-body forces large infrared limit 4-body forces moderate szpigel timoteo duraes similarity renormalization group evolution nucleon - potentials subtracted kernel method approach annals phys 326 364 2010 jurgenson maris furnstahl navratil ormand vary p - shell nuclei similarity renormalization group three - nucleon interactions phys 054312 2013 wendt similarity renormalization evolution three - nucleon forces hyperspherical momentum representation 061001 2013 | 0.318686 | 2,109 | 1,081 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,114 | in a fourth generation model with heavy quarks , the production cross section of the higgs boson in the gluon - gluon fusion process is significantly increased due to additional quark loops . in a similar way ,
the partial decay width of the decay channels @xmath0 and @xmath1 is modified . these changes and their impact on the higgs search
are discussed .
lal 11 - 109 fourth generation , higgs production , higgs decays | the standard model ( sm ) are known to have three families of charged and neutral fermions .
there is however no upper limit on the number of fermion families .
a fourth family ( sm4 ) @xcite could be in fact the key to many unsolved puzzles , such as the hierarchies of the fermion mass spectrum including neutrino masses and mixing , electroweak symmetry breaking , baryogenesis , and a variety of interesting phenomena in cp and flavor physics @xcite .
fourth family leptons and quarks have been searched for previously by the lep and tevatron experiments and now by the lhc experiments .
the most stringent lower mass limits at 95% cl are @xcite @xmath2 the mass bound on the heavy neutrino depends on the type of neutrino ( dirac or majorana ) and whether one considers a coupling of the heavy neutrino to @xmath3 or @xmath4 .
it should also be noted that assumptions about the coupling of the fourth family and the decay mode were made in deriving the quark mass limits .
the limits can be weaker without these assumptions .
on the other hand , the triviality bound from unitarity of the @xmath5 @xmath6-wave scattering @xcite indicates a maximum @xmath7 mass of around 500gev , although this estimate is based on tree - level expressions . with the presence of fourth family quarks , the dominant higgs production process , the gluon - gluon fusion process ,
is further enhanced ( see sec .
[ sec : sigma ] and also @xcite ) . using the large enhancement of @xmath8 in sm4 , cdf , d0 and cms have been able to exclude the sm4 higgs boson at 95% cl for @xmath9gev @xcite and @xmath10gev @xcite . in @xcite
( see also @xcite ) , it was pointed out that the mass limit on @xmath11 ( eq.([eq : nu4_limit ] ) ) was derived when the mixing angle between the fourth family neutrino and at least one of the neutrinos in the sm is assumed to be larger than @xmath12 . for smaller mixing angles , @xmath13 is quasistable and the mass of @xmath13 is bounded only from the analysis of @xmath14 boson decay at @xmath15gev @xcite . in this case , the decay mode @xmath16 becomes the dominant one at low higgs mass and the tevatron lower mass limits of 131gev would be increased to 155gev @xcite . in the following
, we will not consider this possibility .
in the sm , the dominant higgs production process is the gluon - gluon fusion process where gluons from colliding beams couple to a heavy quark loop from which the higgs boson is emitted .
the cross section at the leading - order ( lo ) can be written as @xcite @xmath17 with @xmath18 ^ 2|i|^2\,,\hspace{5 mm } i=\sum_q i_q\ ] ] and @xmath19 is the gluon distribution evaluated at @xmath20 and @xmath21 , @xmath22 ( @xmath23 ) is the fermi ( strong ) coupling constant .
the quantity @xmath24 is given in terms of @xmath25 : @xmath26\,,\ ] ] where @xmath27 with @xmath28 . in the heavy quark @xmath29 limit , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , whereas in the light quark @xmath29 limit @xmath32 , @xmath33 .
this is why in the sm , the top quark is by far the dominant contribution . in a fourth generation with two additional heavier quark @xmath7 and @xmath34 ,
the higgs production cross section is enhanced with that of the sm by a factor @xmath35 the dependence as a function of the higgs boson mass @xmath36 is shown in fig .
[ fig : rsigma ] for two different @xmath37 values of infinite mass and 400gev .
the @xmath7 mass is fixed as @xcite @xmath38}\right)\,,\ ] ] to be consistent with the constraint of electroweak precision data . the maximum enhancement factor of about 9 is reached at the small higgs boson mass @xmath36 value where @xmath39 and @xmath40 . for two scenarios with @xmath41 and @xmath42 . ] at low @xmath36 , the enhancement is independent of the quark mass value of the fourth generation . at higher higgs mass values , the heavier the quark mass , the smaller the enhancement factor .
the heavy @xmath43 scenario may not be physical as when it is beyond about @xmath44gev the weak interaction among heavy particles becomes strong and perturbation theory breaks down .
however , since the enhancement is the smallest , the resulting exclusion limits would be more conservative .
this is the scenario used by cms in their recent publication @xcite .
the other scenario with @xmath45gev corresponds to one of the scenarios used by the tevatron experiments @xcite . in fig .
[ fig : rsigma ] , the enhancement based on lo cross sections is also compared with the corresponding factor in nlo calculated with a modified higlu program @xcite .
the cross sections @xmath46 are calculated for @xmath47 collisions at 7tev center - of - mass energy has essentially no dependence on it . ] .
as far as the ratio @xmath48 is concerned , the difference between nlo and lo is small .
this means that one may use this ratio ( e.g. in nlo ) and precisely predicted sm cross section values in higher orders to derive the corresponding higher - order cross section in a fourth generation model : @xmath49 indeed , use this relation and take the nnlo cross section value @xmath50 pb at @xmath51gev as an example ( table 1 in @xcite ) and the corresponding enhancement factor of 9.223 ( see the linked web page below ) , we obtain 182.79pb for the low mass scenario .
this derived cross section value @xmath52 is in excellent agreement with the independent prediction of 182.51pb given in table 1 in @xcite .
the sm higgs decay branching fractions calculated using hdecay @xcite is displayed in fig . [
fig : br ] .
the decay mode @xmath53 is the reverse of the gluon - gluon fusion process @xmath54 .
the partial decay width of the decay mode @xmath53 in a fourth generation model with respect to that of the sm is thus enhanced by the same factor as the corresponding higgs production cross section in the gluon - gluon fusion process ( eq.([eq : rsigma ] ) ) .
the decay mode @xmath55 is similar to @xmath53 except that charged leptons , the @xmath56-boson and charged higgs bosons also contribute to the loop .
the partial decay width is @xcite @xmath57 where @xmath58 is the fine - structure coupling constant .
the quark , lepton , @xmath56-boson and colorless charged scalar contributions are @xcite : @xmath59 where @xmath60 denotes the charge of fermion @xmath61 in units of @xmath62 and @xmath63\,,\\ & & i_l=2\lambda_l+\lambda_l(4\lambda_l-1)f(\lambda_l)\,,\\ & & i_w=3\lambda_w(1 - 2\lambda_w)f(\lambda_w)-3\lambda_w-\frac{1}{2}\,,\\ & & i_s=-\lambda_s\left[1 + 2\lambda_s f(\lambda_s)\right]\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath64 . in a fourth generation model , both @xmath65 and @xmath66 terms receive additional contributions from fourth generation quarks @xmath67 and lepton @xmath68 . finally the partial decay width @xmath69 is also affected by additional fourth generation quark loops . therefore the branching fractions ( fig .
[ fig : br_sm4 ] ) in a fourth generation model look different from that of the sm in particular for @xmath70 , @xmath71 and @xmath1 modes at low higgs mass values .
tev ( left ) and @xmath72gev ( right).,title="fig : " ] tev ( left ) and @xmath72gev ( right).,title="fig : " ] in fig . [ fig : br_sm4 ] , the two mass scenarios are compared .
the @xmath68 mass is further assumed to be the same as that of @xmath34 .
but as far as these fourth generation quark and lepton masses are heavy enough ( @xmath73 ) , the difference in branching fractions is hardly visible .
the branching fractions in a fourth generation model are calculated without applying the electroweak and higher - order qcd corrections as they do not apply to the fourth generation quarks .
for the relevant decay modes @xmath71 and @xmath74 , the ratio of the branching fractions in a fourth generation model over that in the sm @xmath75 is compared in the two mass scenarios in fig .
[ fig : rbr](left ) , which shows that the effect of the mass scenarios is indeed small .
the effect of the electroweak and higher - order qcd corrections on the branching fraction ratio is also small as it is illustrated in fig .
[ fig : rbr](right ) .
the overall enhancement of the product of the higgs production cross section and the higgs branching fraction in a fourth family over that in the sm @xmath76_{\rm sm4}}{\left[\sigma(gg\rightarrow h)\times b(h\rightarrow x)\right]_{\rm sm}}\ ] ] is shown in fig .
[ fig : xsbr ] as a function of the higgs mass for decay modes @xmath77 , @xmath78 and @xmath79 and for the two mass scenarios . the numerical values for @xmath48 , @xmath80 and @xmath81 for 59 higgs mass points ranging from 110gev to 600gev are given in linked web pages @xcite .
one advantage of reporting @xmath48 instead of @xmath82 that we mentioned in sec .
[ sec : sigma ] is that the ratio is less sensitive to higher order corrections .
it is also less sensitive to other theoretical uncertainties .
one example is the dependence on the choice of parton distribution functions ( pdfs ) . in fig .
[ fig : pdf ] , the variation of choosing two different pdfs ( mstw2008nlo @xcite and herapdf1.0 @xcite ) has been compared with the default choice of cteq6 m @xcite . in the considered higgs mass range ,
the difference on @xmath48 is well within 0.2% . shown for the high mass quark scenario as a function of the higgs mass @xmath36 . ]
we have discussed the implication in the higgs production cross sections in the gluon - gluon fusion process and the higgs decay branching fractions in modes @xmath70 , @xmath71 and @xmath1 when including quarks and leptons of a fourth generation model .
the enhancement / modification on the gluon - gluon fusion cross section ( @xmath48 ) and the higgs decay branching fractions ( @xmath83 ) of a fourth generation model over the sm as a function of the higgs mass @xmath36 in the range of @xmath84gev has been calculated and shown for two mass scenarios .
these ratios are found to have little sensitive to theoretical variations such as the higher order corrections for both @xmath48 and @xmath83 and pdfs for @xmath48 .
the authors wish to thank m. spira for help and advice in using the higlu and hdecay codes .
z. zhang is also grateful to f. richard and e. kou for discussions .
t. aaltonen _ et al .
_ , ( the cdf collaboration ) , _
search for heavy bottom - like quarks decaying to an electron or muon and jets in @xmath85 collisions at @xmath86tev _ , phys .
106 ( 2011 ) 141803 [ arxiv:1101.5728 [ hep - ex ] ] .
kribs , t. plehn , m. spannowsky and t.m.p .
tait , _ four generations and higgs physics _ , phys .
d76 ( 2007 ) 075016 [ arxiv:0706.3718 [ hep - ph ] ] .
n. becerici schmidt , s.a .
etin , s. istin and s. sultansoy , _ the fourth standard model family and the competition in standard model higgs boson search at tevatron and lhc _ , eur .
j. c66 ( 2010 ) 119 [ arxiv:0908.2653 [ hep - ph ] ] .
t. aaltonen _ et al . _ , ( the cdf and d0 collaborations ) , _ combined tevatron upper limit on @xmath88 and constraints on the higgs boson mass in fourth - generation fermion models _ , ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1005.3216 [ hep - ex ] ] . s. chatrchyan _ et al . _ ( the cms collaboration ) , _ measurement of @xmath89 production and search for the higgs boson in @xmath47 collisions at @xmath90tev _ , phys . lett . b699 ( 2011 ) 25 [ arxiv:1102.5429 [ hep - ex ] ] .
aaron _ et al .
_ , ( the h1 and zeus collaborations ) , _ combined measurement and qcd analysis of the inclusive @xmath91 scattering cross sections at hera _ , jhep 1001 ( 2010 ) 109 [ arxiv:0911.0884 [ hep - ex ] ] . | standard model sm ) three families charged neutral fermions no upper limit families fourth family ( sm4 ) @xcite key to puzzles hierarchies fermion mass spectrum neutrino masses mixing electroweak symmetry breaking baryogenesis phenomena cp flavor physics fourth family leptons quarks searched by lep tevatron experiments lhc experiments stringent lower mass limits at 95% cl are @xcite @xmath2 mass bound heavy neutrino depends on type neutrino coupling @xmath3 or @xmath4 assumptions about coupling fourth family decay mode quark mass limits limits weaker without assumptions triviality unitarity @xmath5 @xmath6-wave scattering @xcite maximum @xmath7 mass around 500gev based tree - level expressions fourth family quarks dominant higgs production process gluon - gluon fusion process enhanced large enhancement of @xmath8 sm4 cdf d0 cms exclude sm4 higgs boson at 95% cl for @xmath9gev @xcite @xmath10gev @xcite mass limit on @xmath11nu4_limit derived mixing angle between fourth family neutrino sm larger than @xmath12 smaller mixing angles @xmath13 quasistable mass bounded from @xmath14 boson decay at @xmath15gev @xcite decay mode @xmath16 dominant at low higgs mass tevatron lower mass limits 131gev increased to 155gev @xcite dominant higgs production process gluon - gluon fusion gluons colliding beams couple to heavy quark loop higgs boson emitted cross section at leading - order written as @xcite @xmath17 with @xmath18 @xmath19 gluon distribution at @xmath20 and @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 fermi coupling constant quantity @xmath24 @xmath25 : @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 heavy quark @xmath29 @xmath31 light quark @xmath33 top quark dominant contribution fourth generation heavier quark @xmath7 and @xmath34 higgs production cross section enhanced by factor @xmath35 dependence higgs boson mass @xmath36 shown in fig .fig rsigma two @xmath37 values infinite mass 400gev @xmath7 mass fixed @xcite @xmath38 consistent electroweak precision data maximum enhancement factor 9 small higgs boson mass @xmath36 value @xmath39 @xmath40 two scenarios @xmath41 @xmath42 low @xmath36 enhancement independent quark mass fourth generation higher higgs mass values heavier quark mass smaller enhancement factor heavy @xmath43 scenario not physical beyond @xmath44gev weak interaction heavy particles strong perturbation theory breaks down enhancement smallest exclusion limits conservative scenario used cms recent publication @xcite other scenario @xmath45gev tevatron experiments @xcite fig enhancement lo cross sections compared factor nlo modified higlu program @xcite cross sections @xmath46 calculated @xmath47 collisions 7tev center - - mass energy no dependence ratio @xmath48 difference nlo lo small use rationlo predicted sm cross section values higher orders cross section fourth generation model @xmath49 relation nnlo cross section value @xmath50 @xmath51gev table 1 enhancement factor 9.223 obtain 182.79pb low mass scenario derived cross section value @xmath52 prediction 182.51pb table 1 @xcite sm higgs decay branching fractions hdecay @xcite displayed fig . decay mode @xmath53 reverse gluon - gluon fusion process @xmath54 partial decay width fourth generation model enhanced same factor higgs production cross section gluon - gluon fusion process decay mode @xmath55 similar @xmath53 charged leptons @xmath56-boson charged higgs bosons contribute loop partial decay width @xcite @xmath57 @xmath58 fine - structure coupling constantquark lepton @xmath56-boson colorless charged scalar contributions are @xcite @xmath59 @xmath60 charge fermion @xmath61 units @xmath62 @xmath63_l=2\lambda_l+\lambda_l(4_l-1)f)_w=3\lambda_w(1 - 2_w)f)-3\lambda_w-\frac{1}{2}_s=-\lambda_s\left[1 + 2\lambda_s f(_s)\right]{aligned @xmath64 fourth generation model @xmath65 @xmath66 terms receive additional contributions from fourth generation quarks @xmath67 lepton @xmath68 partial decay width @xmath69 affected by fourth generation quark loops branching fractions fourth generation model different for @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath1 modes at low higgs mass values @xmath72gev mass scenarios @xmath68 mass assumed same as @xmath34 fourth generation quark lepton masses heavy difference in branching fractions hardly visiblebranching fractions in fourth generation model calculated without electroweak higher - order qcd corrections decay modes @xmath71 and @xmath74 ratio branching fractions over @xmath75 compared in two mass scenarios in fig effect of mass scenarios small effect electroweak higher - order qcd corrections on branching fraction ratio small illustrated in fig overall enhancement of higgs production cross section higgs branching fraction in fourth family over @xmath76 shown in fig as function of higgs mass for decay modes @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 two mass scenarios numerical values for @xmath48 @xmath80 @xmath81 for 59 higgs mass points from 110gev to 600gev given in linked web pages @xcite advantage of reporting @xmath48 instead of @xmath82 ratio less sensitive to higher order corrections other theoretical uncertainties example dependence on choice of parton distribution functions fig variation of choosing two pdfs compared with default choice of @xcitehiggs mass range difference on @xmath48 within 0.2% high mass quark scenario function higgs mass @xmath36 discussed implication higgs production cross sections gluon - gluon fusion higgs decay branching fractions modes @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath1 quarks leptons fourth generation model enhancement modification gluon - gluon fusion cross section @xmath48 higgs decay branching fractions @xmath83 fourth generation model function higgs mass @xmath36 @xmath84gev calculated two mass scenarios ratios little sensitive theoretical variations higher order corrections @xmath48 @xmath83 authors thank m. spira higlu hdecay codes z. zhang grateful f. richard e. kou t aaltonen al search heavy bottom quarks decaying electron muon jets in @xmath85 collisions @xmath86tev phys . 106 ( 2011 ) 141803 arxiv:1101.5728 kribs plehn spannowsky tait four generations higgs physics phys . d76 ( 2007 ) 075016sultansoy fourth standard model family competition higgs boson search tevatron lhc c66 2010 119 arxiv:0908.2653 hep aaltonen cdf d0 collaborations tevatron limit @xmath88 higgs boson mass fourth generation fermion models 2010 arxiv:1005.3216 hep - ex chatrchyan cms collaboration measurement @xmath89 production search higgs boson @xmath47 collisions phys . lett b699 2011 ) 25 arxiv:1102.5429 hep - ex aaron h1 zeus collaborations measurement qcd analysis @xmath91 scattering cross sections hera 1001 2010 ) 109 arxiv:0911.0884 hep - ex | 0.498972 | 3,137 | 1,640 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,117 | the general lines of the derivation and the main properties of the master equations for the master amplitudes associated to a given feynman graph are recalled . some results for the 2-loop self - mass graph with 4 propagators
are then presented . * master equations for master amplitudes @xmath0 * m. caffo@xmath1 , h. czy @xmath2 , s. laporta@xmath3 and e. remiddi@xmath4 + * _ infn , sezione di bologna , i-40126 bologna , italy _ * _ dipartimento di fisica , universit di bologna , i-40126 bologna , italy _ * _ institute of physics , university of silesia , pl-40007 katowice , poland _
e - mail : caffo@bo.infn.it + czyz@usctoux1.cto.us.edu.pl + laporta@bo.infn.it + remiddi@bo.infn.it + - + pacs 11.10.-z field theory + pacs 11.10.kk field theories in dimensions other than four + pacs 11.15.bt general properties of perturbation theory + @xmath0presented at the zeuthen workshop on elementary particle physics - loops and legs in gauge theories - rheinsberg , 19 - 24 april 1998 . | the integration by part identities @xcite are by now a standard tool for obtaining relations between the many integrals associated to any feynman graph or , equivalently , for working out recurrence relations for expressing the generic integral in terms of the `` master integrals '' or master amplitudes " of the considered graph .
a good example of the use of the integration by part identities is given in @xcite , where the recurrence relations for all the 2-loop self - mass amplitudes are established in the arbitrary masses case .
+ it has been shown in @xcite that by that same technique one can obtain a set of linear first order differential equations for the master integrals themselves ; the coefficients of the equations are ratio of polynomials with integer coefficients in all the variables ; the equations are further non homogeneous , with the non homogeneous terms given by the master integrals of the simpler graphs obtained from the considered graph by removing one or more internal propagators .
+ restricting ourselves for simplicity to the self - mass case , for any feynman graph the related integrals can in general be written in the form @xmath5 in more detail , @xmath6 stands for the @xmath7-continuous integration on an arbitrary number @xmath8 of loops and @xmath9 stands for the set of the corresponding loop momenta , so that there are altogether @xmath10 different scalar products , including @xmath11 ; @xmath12 is the product of any power of the scalar products in the numerators divided by any power of the propagators occurring in the graph ( all masses will always be taken as different , unless otherwise stated ) ; as the propagators are also simple combinations of the scalar products , simplifications might occur between numerator and denominator and as a consequence one expects quite in general @xmath13 different factors altogether in the numerator and denominator , independently of the actual number of propagators present in the graph ( graphs with less propagators have more factors in the numerator and _ viceversa _ ) ; therefore the symbol @xmath14 in eq.([1 ] ) stands in fact for a set of @xmath13 indices the ( integer ) powers of the @xmath13 factors .
+ the integration by parts corresponding to the amplitudes of eq.([1 ] ) are @xmath15 = 0 \ , \hskip 1 cm i=1, ...
,l { \label{2}}\ ] ] where @xmath16 stands for any of the @xmath17 vectors @xmath9 and @xmath18 ; there are therefore @xmath19 identities for each set of indices @xmath14 . the identity is easily established for small @xmath7 the integral of the divergence vanishes
when the derivatives are explicitly carried out , one obtains the sum of a number of terms , all equal to a simple coefficient ( an integer number or , occasionally , @xmath7 ) , times an integrand of the form @xmath20 , with the set of indices @xmath21 differing at most by a unity in two places from the set @xmath14 . +
that set of identities is infinite ; even if they are not all independent , they can be used for obtaining the recurrence relations , by which one can express each integral in terms of a few already mentioned
master amplitudes " , through a relation of the form @xmath22 where the set of indices @xmath23 takes the very few values corresponding to the master amplitudes , @xmath24 refers to simpler master integrals in which one or more denominators are missing , and the coefficients @xmath25 are ratios of polynomials in @xmath7 , masses and @xmath11 .
+ let us consider now one of the master amplitudes themselves , say the master amplitude identified by the set of indices @xmath23 ; according to eq.([1 ] ) we can write @xmath26 by acting with @xmath27 on both sides we get @xmath28 according to the discussion following eq.([2 ] ) , the _ r.h.s .
_ is a combination of integrands ; as eq.([3 ] ) applies to each of the corresponding integrals , one obtains the relations @xmath29 which are the required master equations . as in eq.([3 ] ) , @xmath24 refers to simpler master integrals ( in which one or more denominators are missing ; they constitute the non - homogeneous part of the master equations ) , to be considered as known when studying the @xmath30 .
+ it is obvious from the derivation that the master equations can be established regardless of the number of loops .
it is equally clear that for graphs depending on several external momenta ( such as vertex or 4-body scattering graphs ) one has simply to replace the single operator @xmath27 of eq.([5 ] ) by the set of operators @xmath31 , where @xmath32 run on all the external momenta , and with some more algebra one can obtain master equations in any desired mandelstam variable .
+ the master equations are a powerful tool for the study and the evaluation of the master amplitudes ; among other things : * they provide information on the values of the master amplitudes at special kinematical points ( such as @xmath33 in eq.([6 ] ) ; the _ l.h.s .
_ vanishes , as @xmath33 is a regular point , so that the _ r.h.s .
_ is a relation among master amplitudes at @xmath33 , usually sufficient to fix their values at that point ) ; * the master equations are valid identically in @xmath7 , so that they can be expanded in @xmath34 and solved recursively for the various terms of the expansion in @xmath34 , starting from the most singular ( with 2-loop amplitudes one expects at most a double pole in @xmath34 ) ; * when the initial value at @xmath35 has been obtained , the equations can be integrated by means of fast and precise numerical methods ( for instance with a runge - kutta routine ) , so providing a convenient approach to their numerical evaluation ; note that the numerical approach can be used both for arbitrary @xmath7 or for @xmath36 , once the expansion has been properly carried out ; * the equations can be used to work out virtually any kind of expansion , in particular the large @xmath11 expansion , as will be shown in some detail ; * in particularly simple cases ( for instance when most of the masses vanish and only one or two scales are left ) the analytic quadrature of the equations can lead to the analytic evaluation of the master amplitudes .
the use of the master equations for studying the 1-loop self - mass and the 2-loop sunrise self - mass graph has been already discussed , @xcite , @xcite ; we will describe here its application to the 2-loop 4-propagator self - mass graph shown in fig.1 .
+ the corresponding amplitude is defined as @xmath37\ ( k_2 ^ 2+m_2 ^ 2)\ [ ( p - k_1-k_2)^2+m_3 ^ 2 ] } ; { \label{6a } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] the conventional factor @xmath38 is defined in @xcite , it is sufficient to know that at @xmath36 its value is 1 ; if all momenta are euclidean the @xmath39 in the propagators is not needed .
+ skipping details , the master equation is + where the @xmath40 are the 2-loop self - mass sunrise master amplitudes @xcite@xcite , @xmath41 } ; { \label{6b } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath42 while @xmath43 corresponds to the 2-loop vacuum amplitude , @xmath44 } { \label{6d } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] and , as usual , @xmath45 the value at @xmath35 is ( almost trivially ) found to be @xmath46 the expansion in @xmath34 reads @xmath47 by expanding in the same way all the other amplitudes occurring in the master equation eq.([7 ] ) and using the results of @xcite , the first values are found to be @xmath48 where @xmath49 is the finite part at @xmath36 of the 1-loop self mass ; more exactly , defining @xmath50 } \ , \ ] ] and expanding in @xmath34 , one finds @xcite @xmath51 with @xmath52 { \label{13 } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath53 [ p^2+(m_1-m_2)^2 ] } \ ] ] @xmath54
quite in general , if + 5pt @xmath55 , the large @xmath11 expansion is @xmath56 any @xmath8-loop amplitude , indeed , at large @xmath11 develops @xmath8 terms with fractional powers " in @xmath11 , with exponents @xmath57 , besides the regular " term containing integer powers only . as any 2-loop amplitude has fractional dimension " equal to 2 ( in square mass units ) , on dimensional grounds the coefficients @xmath58 and @xmath59 must have fractional dimension " equal to 0 , 1 and 2 respectively .
+ similar expansions are valid for the sunrise amplitudes appearing in the _ r.h.s .
_ of eq.([7 ] ) such as @xmath60 as well as for the 1-loop self - mass amplitude ( whose fractional power " is just @xmath61 ) @xmath62 when the above expansions are inserted into the master equations and in the recurrence relations ( to be regarded , in this context , as differential equations in the masses ) , one obtains a number of equations providing important relations between the coefficients of the expansions . + as a result , one finds @xcite @xmath63 where @xmath64 is a dimensionless function of @xmath7 only ; an explicit calculation ( most easily performed by putting @xmath65 ) gives for its expansion in @xmath66 @xmath67 all the other @xmath68 can then obtained explicitly and are found to be proportional to @xmath64 .
+ one further finds @xmath69 and similar expressions for all the other @xmath70 .
+ note here that in the massless limit one has the exact relation @xmath71 likewise , one obtains ( @xcite ; the results are reported here with minor changes of notation )
@xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 by expanding as usual around @xmath36 @xmath75 one finds @xmath76 when the large @xmath11 expansions , eq.s([14],[15],[16 ] ) , are substituted into eq.([7 ] ) , one can express the @xmath77 in terms of the other coefficients , already known .
+ one finds @xmath78 and @xmath79 while @xmath80 depends on the combination @xmath81 when the combination is expanded around @xmath36 as in eq.([24 ] ) and the explicit values of eq.([25 ] ) are used , the first 3 terms of the expansion namely the double pole , the simple pole and the term constant in @xmath34 are all found to vanish , suggesting the existence of the exact relation @xmath82 the above result seems to be confirmed by a preliminary investigation of the large @xmath11 behaviour of the 5-propagator 2-loop self - mass graph ( in progress ) . when eq.([28 ] ) is taken as valid , one finds @xmath83 and @xmath84 { \label{30 } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] 2 truecm * acknowledgements . * as in previous work , the algebra needed in all the steps of the work has been processed by means of the computer program form @xcite by j. vermaseren .
one of the authors ( e.r . ) is glad to acknowledge an interesting discussion with k.g .
chetyrkin on the universality of the coefficients of the large @xmath11 expansions
. 2 truecm 99 k.g .
chetyrkin and f.v .
tkachov , , 159 ( 1981 ) ; f.v .
tkachov , , 65 ( 1981 ) .
tarasov , , 455 ( 1997 ) .
e. remiddi , , 1435 ( 1997 ) , hep - th/9711188 ( 1997 ) .
similar equations , for the one - loop box amplitudes in 4 dimensions , was proposed by v. de alfaro , b. jaki and t. regge in their paper _ differential properties of feynman amplitudes _ to the volume _ high - energy physics and elementary particles _
, iaea , vienna 1965 . a differential equations method , based on mass derivatives , has been also proposed by a.v .
kotikov , , 158 ( 1991 ) , and used in a number of subsequent papers ( see in a.v .
kotikov , hep - ph/9807440 ) . in that approach , amplitudes with a single non vanishing mass @xmath23 are expressed as a suitable integral of the corresponding massless amplitudes , which are taken as known .
m. caffo , h. czy , s. laporta and e. remiddi , hep - th/9805118 ( 1998 ) , ( to be published ) .
vermaseren , _ symbolic manipulation with form _ , computer algebra nederland , amsterdam ( 1991 ) . | integration by part identities @xcite standard tool for relations between integrals feynman graph recurrence relations for expressing generic integral master integrals amplitudes of graph example in @xcite recurrence relations for 2-loop self - mass amplitudes established in arbitrary masses case technique linear first order differential equations for master integrals coefficients ratio of polynomials with integer coefficients in variables equations non homogeneous terms by master integrals of simpler graphs obtained removing internal propagators restricting to self - mass case feynman graph related integrals written in form @xmath5 detail @xmath6 @xmath7-continuous integration on arbitrary number @xmath8 of loops @xmath9 for corresponding loop momenta @xmath10 different scalar products including @xmath11 ; @xmath12 product of power scalar products in numerators divided by propagators graph all masses different propagators combinations of scalar products simplifications occur between numerator and denominator expects @xmath13 different factors in numerator and denominator independently of number of propagators graphs with less propagators have more factors in numerator symbol @xmath14 in eq.([1 ] ) stands for @xmath13 indices integer powers of factors integration by parts to amplitudes of eq.([1 ) are @xmath15 = 0 1 cm i=1, ... @xmath16 stands for @xmath17 vectors @xmath9 @xmath18 @xmath19 identities for indices @xmath14 identity established for @xmath7 integral divergence vanishes when derivatives carried out obtains sum of terms equal to simple coefficient times integrand form @xmath20 indices @xmath21 differing by unity two places from @xmath14 set identities infinite used for recurrence relations express each integral few master amplitudes relation of form @xmath22 indices @xmath23 takes few values master amplitudes @xmath24 refers to simpler master integrals denominators missing coefficients @xmath25 are ratios of polynomials in @xmath7 masses @xmath11 consider master identified by indices @xmath23 eq.([1 ] ) write @xmath26 acting with @xmath27 get @xmath28([2 ] ) r.h.s combination of integrands eq.([3 ] ) applies integrals obtains relations @xmath29 required master equations eq.([3 ] ) @xmath24 refers simpler master integrals one denominators missing non - homogeneous part master equations studying @xmath30 master equations established regardless number loops depending on external momenta 4-body replace single operator @xmath27 eq.([5 ] ) by operators @xmath31 @xmath32 run on external momenta algebra obtain master equations any desired mandelstam variable master equations powerful tool study evaluation master amplitudes provide information values master amplitudes at special kinematical points @xmath33 eq.([6 ] ) _ l.h.s . _ vanishes @xmath33 regular point _ r.h.s .relation among master amplitudes at @xmath33 sufficient to fix values master equations valid in @xmath7 expanded in @xmath34 solved recursively for terms from singular 2-loop amplitudes double pole in @xmath34 initial value at @xmath35 obtained equations integrated fast precise numerical methods runge - kutta routine convenient approach to numerical evaluation numerical approach used for @xmath7 or @xmath36 expansion carried out equations used work any expansion large @xmath11 expansion simple cases masses vanish scales left analytic quadrature of equations lead to analytic evaluation of master amplitudes use master equations for studying 1-loop - mass 2-loop sunrise self - mass graph discussed application to 2-loop 4-propagator self - mass graph in fig.1 corresponding amplitude defined as @xmath37\ ( k_2 ^ 2+m_2 ^ 2) - k_1-k_2)^2+m_3 ^ 2 conventional factor @xmath38 defined in @xcite at @xmath36 value is 1 if all momenta euclidean @xmath39 in propagators not neededskipping details master equation @xmath40 2-loop self - mass sunrise master amplitudes @xcite @xmath41{6b{aligned} @xmath42 @xmath43 2-loop vacuum amplitude @xmath44{6d{aligned} @xmath45 value @xmath35 @xmath46 expansion @xmath34 reads @xmath47 expanding other amplitudes master equation using results @xcite first values @xmath48 @xmath49 finite part at @xmath36 1-loop self mass defining @xmath50 expanding @xmath34 finds @xcite @xmath51 @xmath52{13{aligned} @xmath53 [ p^2+(m_1-m_2)^2 ] @xmath54 + 5pt @xmath55 large @xmath11 expansion is @xmath56 @xmath8-loop amplitude large @xmath11 develops @xmath8 terms powers @xmath11 exponents @xmath57 regular term integer powers 2-loop amplitude fractional dimension equal to 2 square mass units coefficients @xmath58 @xmath59 fractional dimension equal to 0 1 2 similar expansions valid for sunrise amplitudes eq.([7 ] ) @xmath60 1-loop self - mass amplitude fractional power @xmath61 ) @xmath62 expansions inserted into master equations recurrence relations differential equations masses obtains equations relations between coefficients expansions finds @xcite @xmath63 @xmath64 dimensionless function @xmath7 explicit calculation @xmath65 ) expansion @xmath66 @xmath67 other @xmath68 obtained proportional to @xmath64 finds @xmath69 similar expressions @xmath70 massless limit exact relation @xmath71 obtains @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 expanding around @xmath36 @xmath75 finds @xmath76 large @xmath11 expansions eq([14],[15][16 ] substituted into eq.([7 ] ) express @xmath77 other coefficients finds @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 depends combination @xmath81 combination expanded around @xmath36 eq.([24 ] ) explicit values eq.([25 ] ) used first 3 terms expansion double simple pole constant @xmath34 vanish suggesting exact relation @xmath82 result confirmed preliminary investigation large @xmath11 behaviour 5-propagator 2-loop self - mass graph eq.([28 ] ) valid finds @xmath83 @xmath84 algebra processed computer program @xcite by j. vermaseren discussion with k.g . chetyrkin universality coefficients large @xmath11 expansions chetyrkin f.v . tkachov 159 ( 1981 ) 65 ( 1981 ) tarasov , 455 ( 1997 ) e. remiddi 1435 ( 1997 ) hep -/9711188 ( similar equations one - loop box amplitudes 4 dimensions proposed v. de alfaro b. jaki t. regge differential properties feynman amplitudes high - energy physics elementary particles vienna 1965 differential equations method based mass derivatives proposed by a.v . kotikov 158 ( 1991 ) used subsequent papers hep -/9807440 )amplitudes vanishing mass @xmath23 expressed integral massless amplitudes known m. caffo h. czy s laporta e remiddi hep - th/9805118 1998 published vermaseren symbolic manipulation form computer algebra nederland amsterdam 1991 | 0.497332 | 2,920 | 1,585 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,124 | we investigate the effects of new physics scenarios containing a high mass vector resonance on top pair production at the lhc , using the polarization of the produced top .
in particular we use kinematic distributions of the secondary lepton coming from top decay , which depends on top polarization , as it has been shown that the angular distribution of the decay lepton is insensitive to the anomalous @xmath0 vertex and hence is a pure probe of new physics in top quark production .
spin sensitive variables involving the decay lepton are used to probe top polarization .
some sensitivity is found for the new couplings of the top .
address = center for high energy physics , iisc , bangalore , 560 012 , india address = physical research laboratory , navarangpura , ahmedabad 380 009 , india address = helsinki institute of physics , p.o .
box 64 , helsinki 00014 , finland address = institut fr theoretische physik und astronomie , universitt wrzburg , 97074 , germany | though the mass of the top quark has been measured precisely , its coupling to other particles and production and decay schemes have not been probed in detail so far .
the top s large mass @xmath1 gev , and hence its large coupling to the higgs and longitudinal component of the @xmath2 boson makes it a sensitive probe of the mechanism of electroweak symmerty breaking ( esb ) .
top quark properties are an important input to electroweak precision analysis .
alternative mechanisms of esb and many new physics scenarios incorporate a special role for the top quark .
it is thus important to determine if the couplings of the top follow those of the first two generations as in the standard model ( sm ) or different electroweak and/or strong couplings apply in this case .
an important property of the top is that it decays before hadronization ( with a lifetime @xmath3 which is an order of magnitude smaller than the hadronization lifetime of @xmath4 ) . as a result the spin of the _ bare _ top is not diluted by hadronization , but is imprinted on characteristic angular distributions of its decay products , the @xmath2 boson and @xmath5 quark . for a review see @xcite .
the degree of top polarization depends on its production process and thus can probe sm / bsm scenarios , since any couplings of the top to new particles can alter its degree of polarization . in this talk
, we investigate the effects on top polarization , via decay lepton angular distributions , due to the presence of a high mass vector resonance , like the @xmath6 in littlest higgs models .
the polarization of the top is detected through the angular distribution of its decay products .
mass reconstruction is better for the hadronic decay channel but it suffers from a large qcd background .
the leptonic channel is cleaner but mass reconstruction is difficult due to missing energy . for a @xmath7 final state at a hadron collider
the optimal detection channel is semileptonic with @xmath8 and @xmath9 jets .
top polarization can allow measurements of parameters of the model / new physics and can give more information on the production mechanism than just the cross section .
it requires parity violation and thus measures left - right mixing and can probe @xmath10 violation through dipole couplings . even in parity conserving qcd , though the top is produced unpolarized ( at tree level ) , there are different rates for opposite helicity and same helicity @xmath7 production , i.e , the spin of the @xmath11 is correlated with the @xmath12 .
top spin can be measured by the angular decay distribution of the particle / jet @xmath13 in the rest frame of the top . for hadronic @xmath7 production ,
spin correlations between the decay leptons from the @xmath11 and @xmath12 have been extensively studied @xcite .
these spin correlations measure the asymmetry between the production of like and unlike helicity pairs of @xmath7 which can probe new physics in top pair production
. however , this requires the reconstruction of the @xmath11 and @xmath12 rest frames , which is difficult , if not impossible , at the lhc . here
we investigate if _ single top polarization _ can be a qualitative or quantitative probe of new physics and can provide better statistics for top pair production at the lhc .
new physics can also appear in the @xmath0 decay vertex , apart from that in top production , leading to changed decay width and distributions for the @xmath14 and @xmath15 .
the model independent form factor for the @xmath0 vertex can be parametrised as @xmath16 \label{anomaloustbw}\ ] ] where for the sm @xmath17 and the anomalous couplings @xmath18 .
the simultaneous presence of new physics in top production and decay can complicate the analysis making it difficult to isolate new couplings of the top .
however it has been proved that _
angular distributions _ of charged leptons/@xmath19 quarks from top decay are _ not affected by the anomalous @xmath20 vertex _ , see @xcite and references therein .
this has been shown very generally for a @xmath21 process and assumes the narrow width approximation ( nwa ) for the top and neglects terms quadratic in the anomalous couplings in ( [ anomaloustbw ] ) , assuming new physics couplings to be small .
this implies that charged lepton angular distributions , a _ decoupled observable _ , are more accurate probes of top polarization , and thus to new physics in top production alone .
in contrast , the energy distributions of the @xmath15 or the angular distributions of the @xmath5 and @xmath2 are `` contaminated '' by the anomalous @xmath0 vertex .
invariant mass distribution in gev for top pair production at the lhc for the total ( left ) and polarized ( right ) cross sections with @xmath22 gev and @xmath23.,title="fig : " ] invariant mass distribution in gev for top pair production at the lhc for the total ( left ) and polarized ( right ) cross sections with @xmath22 gev and @xmath23.,title="fig : " ] using the spin density matrix formalism for top production and decay ( which retains the spin information of the decaying quark ) and the nwa , the amplitude squared can be factored into production and decay parts as @xmath24 where @xmath25 and @xmath26 are the @xmath27 production and decay spin density matrices .
after phase space integration of @xmath25 the resulting top production density matrix @xmath28 can be used to define the polarization density matrix @xmath29 where the top longitudinal polarization is @xmath30 .
the transverse polarization in the production plane is @xmath31 while the transverse polarization perpendicular to the production plane is @xmath32 .
the @xmath33 s can be calculated from the decay lepton angular distributions by a suitable combination of polar and azimuthal angular asymmetries , for details see @xcite .
this requires partial or complete reconstruction of the top momentum in the lab frame .
alternatively , the azimuthal distribution of the lepton in the lab frame can be used to probe top polarization .
@xmath35 production at the lhc proceeds therough @xmath36 . in models with an extra heavy gauge boson , @xmath34
, top pair production receives an extra contribution in the @xmath37 channel apart from the @xmath38 and gluon . for concreteness
we choose the littlest higgs model where the left handed couplings to quarks of the resonance @xmath6 can be parametrized as @xmath39 for @xmath40 , where @xmath41 is the electroweak coupling and @xmath42 is a mixing angle in the model @xcite .
the @xmath6 mass and coupling @xmath43 completely specify @xmath35 production and decay dynamics .
1 shows the effects of the @xmath6 resonance on the total cross section and the difference between the cross sections for the left and right handed top s . understandably , the resonace is sharper for the polarized cross section because of the absence of the large qcd background .
distribution for the sm and littlest higgs model for right and left handed top-@xmath44 couplings ( left ) and the azimuthal asymmetry @xmath45 as a function of @xmath46 ( right).,title="fig : " ] distribution for the sm and littlest higgs model for right and left handed top-@xmath44 couplings ( left ) and the azimuthal asymmetry @xmath45 as a function of @xmath46 ( right).,title="fig : " ] we now consider angular distributions of the lepton in the lab frame , since there are easily measured experimentally at the lhc ( considering inclusive decay of the @xmath12 ) .
they are a pure probe of top polarization , since they are independent of any possible new physics in top decay
. however , the polar angle , measuring the forward backward asymmetry with respect to boost direction in the parton cm frame , is only mildly sensitive to the magnitude of top polarization and almost insensitive to the sign of polarization .
this leaves the lepton azimuthal angle @xmath47 measured with respect to the @xmath35 production plane .
2 shows the normalized @xmath47 distribution for the sm and the littlest higgs for @xmath48 gev and @xmath23 .
the peak at @xmath49 is sensitive to the magnitude of top polarization @xmath50 and can distinguish between right and left handed tops ( @xmath51 in this case resulting in the @xmath47 distribution being symmetric around @xmath52 ) .
we can thus construct a normalized azimuthal asymmetry sensitive to top polarization for comparision with the sm case , by taking the difference between cross sections in the ( 1,4 ) and ( 2,3 ) quadrants : @xmath53 . a plot of the azimuthal asymmetry for different @xmath43 is shown in fig .
2 as function of @xmath6 mass . @xmath45
reflects the degree of top polarization , saturating to the sm value for large @xmath46 and equalling it around 600 gev .
we find a large sensitivity for the variable @xmath54 , the difference between the azimuthal asymmetries in the littlest higgs and sm .
work is currently underway to study spin sensitive variables to qualitatively and quantitatively probe top polarization .
we acknowledge support from the indo - french project ifcpar no .
rmg acknowledges dst , india for support under grant no .
sr / s2/jcb-64/2007 and kr thanks the academy of finland for partial support under project no .
115032 . the work of r.k.s .
is supported by the german bmbf under contract 05ht6wwa .
w. bernreuther , j. phys .
g * 35 * , 083001 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0805.1333 [ hep - ph ] ] ; m. beneke et al .
2000 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0507207 ] ; s. willenbrock , arxiv : hep - ph/0211067 .
g. mahlon and s.j .
parke , phys .
d * 53 * , 4886 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9512264 ] ; phys .
b * 411 * , 173 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9706304 ] ; r. m. godbole , s. d. rindani and r. k. singh , jhep * 0612 * , 021 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0605100 ] .
t. han , h. e. logan , b. mcelrath and l. t. wang , phys .
d * 67 * , 095004 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0301040 ] . | mass top quark measured precisely coupling to particles production decay schemes not probed top s large mass @xmath1 gev large coupling to higgs @xmath2 boson sensitive probe electroweak symmerty breaking top quark properties important electroweak precision analysis alternative mechanisms esb new physics scenarios incorporate special role top quark important to determine if couplings follow first two generations or different electroweak strong couplings apply top decays before hadronization lifetime @xmath3 smaller than hadronization lifetime @xmath4 spin top not diluted by hadronization imprinted on angular distributions decay products @xmath2 boson @xmath5 quark top polarization depends on production process scenarios couplings to new particles alter polarization investigate effects on top polarization via decay lepton angular distributions high mass vector resonance @xmath6 higgs models polarization top detected through angular distribution decay products mass reconstruction better for hadronic decay channel suffers large qcd background leptonic channel cleaner reconstruction difficult due to missing energy@xmath7 final state hadron collider optimal detection channel semileptonic @xmath8 @xmath9 jets top polarization measurements parameters model new physics more information production mechanism requires parity violation measures left - right mixing @xmath10 violation dipole couplings parity conserving qcd top unpolarized different rates opposite helicity same helicity @xmath7 production spin @xmath11 correlated @xmath12 top spin measured angular decay distribution particle jet @xmath13 rest frame top hadronic @xmath7 production spin correlations decay leptons @xmath11 @xmath12 studied measure asymmetry production like unlike helicity pairs @xmath7 probe new physics top pair production reconstruction @xmath11 @xmath12 rest frames difficult lhc single top polarization probe new physics better statistics top pair production lhc new physics @xmath0 decay vertex changed decay width distributions @xmath14 @xmath15 model independent form factor @xmath0 vertex parametrised @xmath16 sm @xmath17 anomalous couplings @xmath18simultaneous new physics in top production decay analysis difficult to isolate new couplings proved angular distributions of charged leptons/@xmath19 quarks from top decay not affected by anomalous @xmath20 vertex shown for @xmath21 process assumes narrow width approximation for top neglects terms quadratic in anomalous couplings assuming new physics couplings small implies charged lepton angular distributions are more accurate top polarization new physics in top production energy distributions of @xmath15 or angular distributions @xmath5 and @xmath2 contaminated by anomalous @xmath0 vertex invariant mass distribution in gev for top pair production at lhc for polarized cross sections with @xmath22 gev @xmath23 using spin density matrix formalism for top production decay amplitude squared can be factored into production decay parts as @xmath24 @xmath25 and @xmath26 are @xmath27 production and decay spin density matricesphase integration @xmath25 top production density matrix @xmath28 polarization density matrix @xmath29 top longitudinal polarization @xmath30 transverse polarization plane @xmath31 perpendicular @xmath32 @xmath33 calculated decay lepton angular distributions polar azimuthal angular asymmetries @xcite reconstruction top momentum lab frame azimuthal distribution lepton top polarization @xmath35 production lhc proceeds @xmath36 extra heavy gauge boson @xmath34 top pair production extra contribution @xmath37 channel littlest higgs model left handed couplings quarks resonance @xmath6 parametrized @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 electroweak coupling @xmath42 mixing angle @xmath6 mass coupling @xmath43 specify @xmath35 production decay dynamics effects @xmath6 resonance total cross section difference cross sections left right handed top s resonace sharper polarized cross section absence large qcd backgrounddistribution sm littlest higgs model right top-@xmath44 couplings left azimuthal asymmetry @xmath45 function @xmath46 sm littlest higgs model top-@xmath44 couplings left azimuthal asymmetry @xmath45 function @xmath46 angular distributions lepton lab frame measured lhc decay @xmath12 probe top polarization independent new physics top decay polar angle forward asymmetry boost direction frame mildly sensitive top polarization insensitive sign polarization leaves lepton azimuthal angle @xmath47 measured @xmath35 production plane 2 shows normalized @xmath47 distribution sm littlest higgs @xmath48 gev @xmath23 peak @xmath49 sensitive top polarization @xmath50 distinguish right left tops @xmath51 @xmath47 distribution symmetric @xmath52 construct normalized azimuthal asymmetry sensitive top polarization comparision sm case difference cross sections ( 1,4 ) 2,3 ) quadrants @xmath53 plot azimuthal asymmetry @xmath43 fig . 2 function @xmath6 mass @xmath45 reflects top polarization saturating sm value @xmath46 equalling 600 gevlarge sensitivity variable @xmath54 difference azimuthal asymmetries higgs sm work underway study spin sensitive variables probe top polarization acknowledge support indo - french project acknowledges dst india support grant s2/jcb-64/2007 thanks academy finland partial support project 115032 work supported german bmbf contract 05ht6wwa bernreuther . g * 35 * 083001 2008 ) arxiv:0805.1333 hep ph beneke al 2000 hep - ph/0507207 willenbrock hep - ph/0211067 mahlon parke phys . d * 53 * 4886 1996 ) ph/9512264 phys b * 411 * 173 1997 ) ph/9706304 godbole rindani singh 0612 * 021 ( 2006 ) ph/0605100 han logan mcelrath wang phys . d * 67 * 095004 2003 ) hep - ph/0301040 | 0.354758 | 2,411 | 1,248 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,133 | we discuss several similarities and differences between the concepts of electric and magnetic dipoles .
we then consider the relation between the magnetic dipole and a current loop and show that in the limit of a pointlike circuit , their magnetic fields coincide .
the presentation is accessible to undergraduate students with a knowledge of the basic ideas of classical electromagnetism .
the concept of a magnetic dipole describes the long distance limit of the field produced by a steady current flowing in a small loop of wire.@xcite the word `` dipole '' is borrowed from electrostatics but when used in magnetostatics , this terminology is somewhat deceptive because a magnetic dipole is physically very different from its electric counterpart .
the aim of this paper is to discuss the similarities and differences of these concepts .
recall the definition of an electric dipole .
we start with a configuration in which two charges @xmath0 and @xmath1 ( @xmath2 ) are located at @xmath3 and @xmath4 respectively .
the electric dipole is obtained by taking the limit @xmath5 keeping fixed the quantity @xmath6 which is called the _ electric dipole moment_. the dipole electric field @xmath7 can be obtained from the potential @xcite @xmath8 so that @xmath9 it might be tempting to define a magnetic dipole with moment @xmath10 in a similar way : that is , the object which generates the magnetic field @xmath11 however , eq .
( [ 4 ] ) is inconsistent with the nonexistence of magnetic monopoles , as described by the maxwell equation @xmath12 because @xmath13 in eq .
we used the result@xcite@xmath14 the failure to satisfy eq .
( [ due ] ) is not surprising because @xmath15 in eq .
was constructed as the limit of zero separation between monopole and anti - monopole , which in the magnetic case do not exist . a modification of eq . ( [ 4 ] ) at the origin
@xcite @xmath16 fixes the problem and gives a divergenceless field .
however , the field given by eq .
( [ 7 ] ) is no longer conservative ( irrotational ) , in contrast to its electric counterpart , eq .
( [ 3 ] ) .
the difference between electric and magnetic fields is that , in a stationary situation , the electric field is conservative as a consequence of the faraday equation @xmath17 whereas the magnetic field , which is divergenceless , can not also be irrotational ( unless it is identically zero ) . in a world without monopoles , a magnetic dipole must be defined in terms of current distributions only .
the magnetic effects of a steady current density @xmath18 are described by ampere s equation @xmath19 from eq .
we can calculate the magnetic field @xmath20 provided the condition , @xmath21 which is equivalent to conservation of charge in the steady case , is satisfied .
equation ( [ uno ] ) shows that the non - conservative part of the magnetic field is located at the points at which the current density is nonzero .
therefore in the magnetic dipole case , eq . ( [ 7 ] ) , the only contribution needed to satisfy ampere s equation is the term proportional to @xmath22 because @xmath23= -{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\times { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}\delta^{(3)}({\mathbf{x}}).\ ] ] we shall now show that @xmath15 given by eq .
( [ 7 ] ) is the magnetic field generated by a current loop of infinitesimal size .
we start from the solution of eqs .
( [ due ] ) and ( [ uno ] ) which can be found in textbooks on electromagnetism : @xcite @xmath24 where @xmath25 is the distance between the generic point @xmath26 of the integration region and the observation point @xmath27 . for a coil @xmath28 made of a thin wire , eq .
( [ dieci ] ) becomes@xcite @xmath29 where the line integral , with length element @xmath30 , runs over the wire whose tangent unit vector is denoted by @xmath31 . the circuit @xmath28 in eq .
( [ dieci2 ] ) must be closed because of eq .
( [ uno2 ] ) , and @xmath32 is the ( constant ) current in the circuit .
we assume that the current loop is a plane circuit enclosing an area @xmath33 .
we denote by @xmath34 the unit vector orthogonal to the plane , oriented according to the right - hand rule with respect to @xmath31 .
we also denote by @xmath35 the external normal to the wire ( see fig . [ massimo_testafig01.pdf ] ) .
these unit vectors are related by @xmath36 if we substitute eq .
( [ ventiquattro ] ) into eq .
( [ dieci2 ] ) , we obtain @xmath37 we use the identity @xmath38 and write eq .
( [ venticinque ] ) as @xmath39.\ ] ] if we use green s formula in two dimensions @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the surface element of @xmath33 , and the relation @xmath42 we obtain @xmath43 + { \hat{\mathbf{n}}}\frac{i}{c } \int_s \delta^3({\mathbf{x}}-{\boldsymbol{\xi}})\,d\sigma \\ & \equiv { \mathbf{b}}^{(1)}_\gamma ( { \mathbf{x}})+{\mathbf{b}}^{(2)}_\gamma ( { \mathbf{x}}).\end{aligned}\ ] ] the gradient @xmath44 is irrotational and is nonzero in all of space , in contrast to @xmath45 which is non - zero only inside the plane region @xmath33 delimited by the coil @xmath28 .
it is instructive to show how @xmath46 satisfies ampere s law in its integral form , that is , @xmath47 where @xmath48 is any closed path linked with @xmath28 as shown in fig [ massimo_testafig01.pdf ] .
because @xmath44 is a pure gradient , we have @xmath49 the integral on the right - hand side of eq .
( [ trenta3 ] ) , by virtue of the delta function , has a contribution only from the point of intersection @xmath50 between @xmath48 and @xmath33 , which leads to eq .
( [ trenta21 ] ) .
equation ( [ trenta3 ] ) is surprising because it shows that ampere s law is satisfied only by @xmath45 , which is the part of the magnetic field localized inside @xmath28 . to make contact with the dipole field @xmath15 given by eq .
( [ 7 ] ) , we take the limit as the coil area goes to zero , keeping the product @xmath51 constant .
we have @xmath52 \\ & = \frac{\mu}{4\pi } { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}_x \left[\frac{1}{s } \int_s ( { \hat{\mathbf{n}}}\cdot { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}_x\frac{1}{r})\,d\sigma \right ] \\ & = \frac{\mu}{4\pi } { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}_x \overline{\left [ ( { \hat{\mathbf{n}}}\cdot { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}_x\frac{1}{r } ) \right ] } , \label{last}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the bar in eq . denotes the mean value in @xmath33 . by the mean value theorem we know that @xmath53}= \left [ ( { \hat{\mathbf{n}}}\cdot { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}_x\frac{1}{r } ) \right]_{\overline{p}}\ ] ] where @xmath54 is a suitable point inside @xmath33 . in the limit of pointlike @xmath33
, we have @xmath55\ ] ] where @xmath56 may be identified with the magnetic moment of the small loop and @xmath57 is the distance between the observation point and the position @xmath58 of the ( pointlike ) circuit . as for @xmath59 , which contains a delta function ,
the pointlike limit must be discussed using generalized functions.@xcite we introduce a test function @xmath60 , which is an infinitely differentiable function vanishing at infinity faster than any inverse power of @xmath61,@xcite , and study the @xmath62 limit of expressions such as @xmath63 . from eq .
( [ trenta ] ) we have @xmath64 when @xmath33 shrinks to the point @xmath58 .
this implies @xmath65 if we compare with eq .
( [ 7 ] ) , we find that an infinitesimal current loop generates a magnetic field identical to the one given by a magnetic dipole of moment @xmath66 .
we thank the reviewers for valuable suggestions on how to improve the presentation of our paper . 5 r. p. feynman , r. b. leighton , and m. sands , _ the feynman lectures on physics _
( addison - wesley , reading , ma , 1999 ) , vol .
2 .
j. d. jackson , _ classical electrodynamics _
( john wiley @xmath67 sons , new york , 1998 ) , 3rd ed .
s. m. blinder , `` delta functions in spherical coordinates and how to avoid losing them : fields of point charges and dipoles , '' am .
j. phys . * 71 * , 816818 ( 2003 ) .
b. d. h. tellegen , `` magnetic - dipole models , '' am .
j. phys .
* 30 * , 650652 ( 1962 ) .
n. d. rao , `` a note on the vector potential of a magnetic dipole , '' am . j. phys .
* 39 * , 12761277 ( 1971 ) .
we use rationalized cgs units .
i. m. gelfand and g. e. shilov , _ generalized functions _ ( academic press , new york , 1964 ) , vol . 1 . j. i. richards and h. k. youn _ the theory of distributions a nontechnical introduction _
( cambridge university press , 1995 ) h. b. g. casimir , _ on the interaction between the atomic nuclei and electrons _ ( w. h. freeman ,
san francisco , 1963 ) .
d. j. griffiths , `` hyperfine splitting in the ground state of hydrogen , '' am .
j. phys .
* 50 * , 698703 ( 1982 ) .
more precisely , we deal with tempered distributions . | the circuit @xmath28 and the closed path @xmath48 used to evaluate the circulation of @xmath46 . ] | circuit closed path @xmath48 circulation @xmath46 | 0.064988 | 26 | 13 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
199,136 | we attempt to find a singularity free interior solution for a neutral and static stellar model .
we consider that ( i ) the star is made up of anisotropic fluid and ( ii ) the mit bag model can be used .
the total system is defined by assuming the density profile given by mak and harko @xcite , which satisfies all the physical conditions of a stellar system and is stable by nature .
we find that those stellar systems which obey such a non - linear density function must have maximum anisotropy at the surface .
we also perform several tests for physical features of the proposed model and show that these are mostly acceptable within certain range . as a special mention , from our investigation
we find that the maximum mass and radius of the quark star are @xmath0 and @xmath1 respectively . | in the present day context the physical properties and internal structure of the compact stars are topics of active research .
itoh @xcite first suggested that the quark stars may exist in hydrostatic equilibrium .
according to bodmer @xcite the quark matter made of @xmath2 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 quarks is more stable than any ordinary nuclear matter .
cheng et al .
@xcite argued that after a supernova explosion a massive star core collapses to a strange star .
it was also proposed by alford @xcite that in the dense core of a neutron star there is sufficiently high density and low temperature to crush the hadrons into quark matter .
it is quite interesting that the equation of state ( eos ) choosen by the following authors in refs .
@xcite for neutron stars did not explain the properties of the observed compact stars like @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 , whereas the strange matter eos can explain them
. in the interior of such stars there may exist many exotic phases .
however , in the present work our investigation is mostly restricted to the eos of strange matter only .
rahaman et al .
@xcite using the mit bag model proposed a new model for strange stars where they analysed the physical properties of the stars from 6 km to the surface . here
we choose phenomenological mit bag model @xcite , according to which , the eos of strange matter can be written in a linear form as following @xmath10 where @xmath11 and @xmath12 are the energy density , the radial pressure and the bag constant respectively . in the bag model
the vacuum pressure @xmath12 confirms the quark confinement that equilibrates the pressure of quarks to stabilize the system . in this paper using mit bag model
we have proposed a new stable model for strange stars , which is neutral , static as well as anisotropic fluid spheres valid under the appropriate physical condition . using the observed value of the mass of strange stars we have analysed their physical properties and also predicted respective radius of the stars .
we have organized our study as follows : in sec .
ii basic equations and the solutions for different physical parameters are provided .
we have discussed various physical features of the strange stars in sec .
iii whereas provide data sets for the strange stars along with a comparative study in the sec .
the article is concluded with a short discussion in sec . v.
we consider that the interior of the strange stars is well described by the following space time metric @xmath13 where @xmath14 and @xmath15 are functions of the radial coordinate @xmath16 only .
the energy - momentum tensor for the proposed strange star model is given by @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 where @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22 in eqs .
( [ eq3 ] ) , ( [ eq4 ] ) and ( [ eq5 ] ) represents the energy density , radial and tangential pressures respectively for the fluid sphere .
the einstein field equations are now can be listed below : @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 let us define the mass function @xmath26 of the star as @xmath27 now assuming that the matter density profile inside the quark star can described as proposed by mak and harko @xcite @xmath28,\label{eq10}\ ] ] where @xmath29 and @xmath30 are the central and surface densities of the star of radius @xmath31 respectively @xmath16 being the radial coordinate .
( [ eq9 ] ) and eq .
( [ eq10 ] ) we find the total mass of the quark star as @xmath32 at the surface the radial pressure must be zero and hence from eq .
( [ eq1 ] ) we have @xmath33 with the choice of eos ( [ eq1 ] ) and using eqs .
( [ eq2 ] ) , ( [ eq6 ] ) - ( [ eq10 ] ) and ( [ eq11a ] ) we obtain the following physical parameters : @xmath34 @xmath35,\notag \\ & \qquad\label{eq13}\end{aligned}\ ] ] as a function of the radial coordinate @xmath16 for the strange star @xmath9 ] as a function of the radial coordinate @xmath16 for the strange star @xmath9 ] @xmath37,\label{eq14}\ ] ] @xmath38},\label{eq15}\ ] ] for the strange star @xmath9 ] for the strange star @xmath9 ] @xmath39{r}^{2}}{36{r}^{2}[{r}^{2 } \left ( \frac{3}{5}\,c_{{1}}{r}^{2 } -\rho_{{c}}{r}^{2 } \right ) \pi + \frac{3}{8}\,{r}^{2}]}},\label{eq16}\ ] ] where @xmath40 , @xmath41 , @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 , @xmath46\\ \hspace*{4cm}-{\frac { 16}{15}}\,{r}^{2 } \left ( \frac{2}{3 } \rho_{{c}}+\rho_{{0 } } \right ) \pi + \frac{2}{3}$ ] , @xmath47 , @xmath48 , @xmath49 , @xmath50{{r}^{2}}$ ] , @xmath51 , @xmath52 .
the behaviour of the above physical parameters are shown in figs . 1 - 5 which are quite satisfactory in their nature .
now let us maximize the anisotropic stress at the surface ( @xmath53 ) without assuming the nature of extremum .
we obtain from eq .
( [ eq16 ] ) as follows @xmath54 . \notag \\ & \qquad \label{eq17}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the above second order differential equation ( [ eq16 ] ) related to anisotropy takes the form on the surface of the system ( i.e. at @xmath53 ) as follows : @xmath55 . \notag\\ & \qquad\hspace{-12 cm } \label{eqa}\end{aligned}\ ] ] now using eqs .
( [ eq11 ] ) , ( [ eq11a ] ) and ( [ eq17 ] ) and taking the value of bag constant as 83 @xmath56 @xcite , we get several solutions for @xmath31 .
however , we examine that among all these solutions only one solution is physically acceptable and also consistent with the buchdahl condition @xcite . for the strange star @xmath9 ]
in this section we shall discuss different physical parameters of the model . according to tolman @xcite , oppenheimer and volkoff @xcite
, the sum of forces should be equal to zero so that the system is subjected to the equilibrium , @xmath57 where @xmath58 , @xmath59 and @xmath60 are the gravitational , hydrostatic and anisotropic forces respectively .
the generalized tov equation @xcite in its explicit form is @xmath61 where @xmath62 is the the effective gravitational mass of the system whcih is defined as @xmath63 where for our system @xmath64\nu_{{r}}$ ] , @xmath65 , and @xmath66 . for the strange star @xmath9 ] we have drawn plot for the above tov equation in fig .
[ fig6 ] . from this
it is clear that our proposed model has achieved equilibrium state under the combined effect of the forces . to satisfy the energy conditions i.e null energy condition ( nec ) , weak energy condition ( wec ) and strong energy condition ( sec ) for an anisotropic fluid sphere composed of strange matter the following inequalities have to be hold simultaneously : @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 the above energy conditions as drawn in fig .
[ fig7 ] shows that our proposed model for the strange stars satisfies all the energy conditions . for the strange star @xmath9 ] using the concept of herrera s cracking ( or overturning ) @xcite we shall examine the stability of our system .
the condition of causality establishes the physical acceptability of a fluid distribution , which demands @xmath70 and @xmath71 . also according to herrera @xcite and andrasson @xcite for the stability of the matter distribution another condition required is @xmath72 and this suggests that ` no cracking '
i.e potentially stable region must be there . from fig .
[ fig8 ] we observe that our system satisfies all of these conditions and thus provides a stable system . for the strange star @xmath9,title="fig : " ] for the strange star @xmath9,title="fig : " ] the maximum allowable mass - radius ratio for the above proposed anisotropic fluid sphere can be calculated following buchdahl @xcite .
he has proposed that the maximum limit of mass - radius ratio for static spherically symmetric perfect fluid star should satisfy the following upper bound @xmath73 .
however , mak and harko @xcite have given the generalized expression for the same mass - radius ratio .
the total mass of the anisotropic compact star which is defined in eq .
( 11 ) can be considered as the maximum mass @xmath74 . from this mass - radius relation
we find out the values of different compact star candidates in table ii and observe that all the values fall within the acceptable range as specified by buchdahl @xcite .
the maximum mass and radius feature is shown in fig . 9 . ] the compactification factor ( @xmath2 ) for the proposed strange star model can be written as @xmath75 so the corresponding surface redshift ( @xmath76 ) as we get from the compactness becomes @xmath77^{- \frac{1}{2}}-1={\frac { 1}{\sqrt { 1 - 8\,\pi \,{r}^{2 } \left ( \frac{2}{15}\rho_{{c } } + \frac{1}{5}\rho_{{0 } } \right ) } } } -1.\label{eq25}\ ] ] the variation of the compactness and redshift with the radial distance are shown in the fig .
[ fig10 ] . for the strange star @xmath9 ]
in this paper we have derived radius of the different strange star candidates using their observational mass and bag constant ( as 83 @xmath56 ) , shown in table [ table1 ] . from figs .
[ fig1 ] - [ fig3 ] it is clear that our solution is free from geometrical and physical singularities .
also it can be observed that the metric potetials @xmath78 and @xmath79 have finite positive values in the range @xmath80 .
the values of the central density , central pressure , buchdahl condition and surface redshift for the different strange star candidates of table [ table1 ] are shown in table [ table2 ] .
it is shown from our model that the surface density of the star @xmath9 is @xmath81 which is very high and consistent with ultra compact stars @xcite .
we also have found out that the redshift of the stars in table [ table2 ] are within the range @xmath82 which is consistent under the constraints @xmath83 and @xmath84 as suggested by the investigators respectively in the following refs .
@xcite and @xcite . from eq .
( [ eq16 ] ) and fig .
[ fig5 ] one can find that the anisotropic force @xmath85 is positive throughout the system , i.e. @xmath86 and hence the direction of the anisotropic force is outward for our system .
the equation @xmath87 suggests that the star has maximum value of radius @xmath88 for @xmath89 . from the equation @xmath90
, the star has maximum value of mass for @xmath91 .
the model yields the values of the maximum mass and maximum central density as @xmath92 and @xmath93 @xmath94 respectively .
.physical parameters of the observed strange stars [ cols= " < , < , < , < , < , < " , ] interestingly , in the present study we find that the anisotropy of the compact star is zero at the center and then it is increasing through out the interior region of the star and reach it s maximum value at the surface . again from eqn .
( [ eqa ] ) it is clear that the @xmath95 is negative , which supports mathematically that the anisotropy is also maximum on the surface of an anisotropic compact star . as a comparative study ,
the maximum anisotropy of few quark stars are given in table [ table3 ] ( the values are calculated from our model ) .
we would also like to mention that the maximum allowable mass to radius ratio is 0.40 as evident from table ii for @xmath9 .
table ii also indicates that all the other values , including this value , lie within the acceptable range as predicted by buchdahl @xcite , i.e. @xmath96 . hence , as a final comment , from the above discussions it can be concluded that the model proposed in this work seems suitable to study the ultra - dense compact strange stars .
sr and fr are thankful to the inter - university centre for astronomy and astrophysics ( iucaa ) , pune , india for providing visiting associateship under which a part of this work was carried out .
sr is also thankful to the authority of the institute of mathematical sciences , chennai , india for providing all types of working facilty and hospitality under the associateship scheme . | present physical properties internal structure compact stars topics active research itoh @xcite suggested quark stars hydrostatic equilibrium bodmer @xcite quark matter @xmath2 quarks stable than ordinary nuclear matter cheng et al. @xcite argued after supernova explosion massive star core collapses to strange star proposed alford @xcite dense core neutron star high density low temperature crush hadrons into quark matter equation of state eos ) authors for neutron stars explain properties compact stars like @xmath5 strange matter eos explain interior stars exotic phases present work investigation restricted to eos strange matter rahaman et al . @xcite model proposed new model for strange stars analysed physical properties from 6 km to surface phenomenological mit bag model @xcite eos of strange matter written linear form @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 energy density radial pressure bag constant vacuum pressure @xmath12 confirms quark confinement equilibrates pressure proposed new stable model for strange stars neutral static anisotropic fluid spheres valid appropriate physical conditionobserved value mass strange stars analysed physical properties predicted radius organized study sec . ii basic equations solutions for physical parameters provided discussed physical features strange stars in sec . iii data sets comparative study sec . article concluded short discussion sec . v. interior strange stars described by space time metric @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 functions radial coordinate @xmath16 energy - momentum tensor proposed strange star model by @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 eqs energy density radial tangential pressures for fluid sphere einstein field equations listed @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 define mass function @xmath26 star as @xmath27 matter density profile inside quark star described proposed mak harko @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 central surface densities star radius @xmath31 @xmath16 radial coordinate total mass quark star as @xmath32 surface radial pressure zero @xmath33 choice eos ( [ eq1 ] ) eqs .eq2 eq6 eq10 eq11a obtain physical parameters @xmath34 @xmath35\label{eq13}{aligned} function radial coordinate @xmath16 strange star @xmath9 radial coordinate strange star @xmath37\label{eq14} @xmath38{eq15} strange star @xmath9 star @xmath39{r}^{2}}{36{r}^{2}{r}^{2 }\frac{3}{5}_{{1}}{r}^{2 } -\rho_{{c}}{r}^{2 } \frac{3}{8}{r}^{2}{eq16} @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath46\\*{4cm}\frac 16}{15}}{r}^{2 } \frac{2}{3 }\rho_{{c}}+\rho_{{0 } + \frac{2}{3}$ @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath50{{r}^{2}}$ @xmath51 @xmath52 physical parameters shown figs . 1 - 5 satisfactory maximize anisotropic stress surface @xmath53 ) nature extremum obtain eq eq16 ] ) @xmath54 . \notag \qquad\label{eq17}{aligned} second order differential equation eq16 related anisotropy surface system @xmath53 ) @xmath55 . \notag\\ \qquad\hspace{-12 cm }\label{eqa}\end{aligned} using eqs eq11 ] eq11a ] eq17 ] ) value bag constant 83 @xmath56 several solutions for @xmath31 one solution physically acceptable consistent with buchdahl condition strange star @xmath9 ] discuss physical parameters model tolman oppenheimer volkoff sum of forces equal to zero system equilibrium @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 gravitational hydrostatic anisotropic forces generalized tov equation @xmath61 @xmath62 effective gravitational mass system @xmath63 system @xmath64$ @xmath65 @xmath66 strange star @xmath9 ] drawn plot tov equation fig . fig6 ] proposed model achieved equilibrium state combined effect forces satisfy energy conditionsnull energy condition nec weak energy wec strong energy sec ) anisotropic fluid sphere strange matter inequalities hold simultaneously @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 energy conditions fig . proposed model strange stars satisfies energy conditions strange star @xmath9 concept herrera s cracking examine stability system condition of causality establishes physical acceptability fluid distribution demands @xmath70 @xmath71 herrera andrasson stability matter distribution condition @xmath72 no cracking potentially stable region fig system satisfies conditions provides stable system strange star @xmath9 maximum mass - radius ratio anisotropic fluid sphere calculated buchdahl @xcite maximum mass - radius ratio static spherically symmetric perfect fluid star satisfy upper bound @xmath73 mak harko @xcite generalized expression same mass - radius ratio total mass anisotropic compact star defined in eq . ( 11 ) maximum mass @xmath74 mass radius relation values of compact star candidates in table ii within acceptable range specified buchdahl @xcite maximum mass radius feature in fig . 9compactification factor @xmath2 ) for proposed strange star model written as @xmath75 surface redshift ( @xmath76 ) becomes @xmath77^{ \frac{1}{2}}-1=\frac 1}{\sqrt { 1 - 8^{2 \left\frac{2}{15}\rho_{{c } + \frac{1}{5}\rho_{{0 }\right -1.{eq25} variation of compactness redshift with radial distance shown in fig for strange star @xmath9 derived radius of different star candidates using observational mass bag constant as 83 @xmath56 ) shown in table solution free from geometrical physical singularities metric potetials @xmath78 and @xmath79 have finite positive values in range @xmath80 central density pressure buchdahl condition surface redshift for strange star candidates shown in table table2 surface density of star @xmath9 is @xmath81 high consistent with ultra compact stars @xcite redshift of stars in table within range @xmath82 consistent under constraints @xmath83 and @xmath84 anisotropic force @xmath85 positive throughout system@xmath86 direction anisotropic force outward for our system equation @xmath87 suggests star has maximum value radius @xmath88 for @xmath89 equation @xmath90 star has maximum mass for @xmath91 model yields maximum mass maximum central density as @xmath92 and @xmath93 @xmath94.physical parameters of observed strange stars present study anisotropy of compact star zero at center increasing interior region maximum at surface @xmath95 negative supports anisotropy maximum on surface of anisotropic compact star comparative study maximum anisotropy of few quark stars in table table3 ] values calculated from our model maximum allowable mass to radius ratio is 0.40 table ii for @xmath9 table ii other values including this value within acceptable range predicted by buchdahl @xcite @xmath96 model proposed suitable to study ultra - dense compact strange stars sr fr thankful to inter - university centre for astronomy astrophysics pune india for visiting associateship thankful to authority institute of mathematical sciences , chennai india for working facilty hospitality under associateship scheme | 0.437537 | 3,067 | 1,583 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,137 | we report on d0 searches for leptoquarks ( lq ) predicted in extended gauge theories and composite models to explain the symmetry between quarks and leptons .
data samples obtained with the d0 detector from @xmath0 collisions at a center - of - mass energy of 1.96 tev corresponding to intergrated luminosities of 14 fb@xmath1 were analyzed .
no evidence for the production of such particles were observed and lower limits on leptoquark masses are set . | current theories @xcite suggest that leptoquarks would come in three different generations corresponding to the three quark and lepton generations .
leptoquarks would have color , fractional electric charge , both lepton and baryon numbers , and could be scalars or vectors . at the tevatron leptoquarks could appear in pairs through @xmath2 annihilation ( dominates for @xmath3 gev ) or @xmath4 fusion , @xmath5 or through the associated lepton production @xmath6 with the contribution of the last one being small .
the pair production cross section for scalar leptoquarks only depends on the strong coupling constant and on the leptoquark mass .
the vector leptoquark pair production cross section also depends on anomalous @xmath7 couplings @xmath8 and @xmath9 , and the experimental constrains are generally given for three models : `` minimal coupling '' ( @xmath10 , @xmath11 ) , `` yang mills '' ( @xmath12 , @xmath11 ) , and `` minus minus '' ( @xmath13 , @xmath14 )
. leptoquarks decay into a charged lepton and a quark with a branching fraction @xmath15 or into a neutrino and a quark with a branching fraction ( @xmath16 ) .
thus frations of a leptoquark pairs into the @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 final states are @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22 respectively .
this report presents a summary searches for leptoquark pair production in the data sets collected with the d0 detector @xcite during run ii ( started march 2001 ) of the fermilab tevatron collider .
a search explored the final state where both leptoquarks decay into a neutrino and quarks assuming @xmath23 : @xmath24 .
the corresponding detector signature is two acoplnar jets accompanied by missing energy .
no selection specific for jet flavor were applied .
thus the search results applied to all three generations of leptoquarks .
the analysis used 2.5 fb@xmath25 of d0 run ii data .
events were recorded using triggers requiring two acoplanar jets and large missing transverse energy , @xmath26 , or large @xmath27 , the vector sum of the jets transverse energy @xmath28 .
the two leading jets were required to be in the central region @xmath29 of the d0 detector and have transverse momenta greater then 35 gev .
the multijet qcd background was suppressed by requiring @xmath26 to be greater then 75 gev and with cuts on angular correlations between jets and @xmath26 directions : the azimutal angle between @xmath26 and the first jet and the minimal and maximal angles between any jets and @xmath26 . to suppress the dominant standard model ( sm ) background from @xmath30 events a veto on events containing an isolated electron or muon with @xmath31 gev
was applied , and events with an isolated track @xmath32 gev were also rejected .
the two final cuts on @xmath26 and @xmath33 were optimized for different signals by minimizing the expected upper limit on the cross section in the absence of signal table [ tab : lq_allgen ] shows the number of data , background and signal events after all selections for @xmath34 gev and @xmath35 gev leptoquark signals .
no significant excess of data over the predicted backround was found .
figure [ fig : lq_allgen ] shows the observed and expected 95% c.l .
limits on scalar leptoquark pair production cross sections as a function of the lq mass .
the observed and expected lower lq mass limit of 214 gev and 222 gev respectively were obtained at the intersection of the experimental cross section limits with the nominal theoretical production cross section calculated for the factorization and renormalization scale @xmath36 .
.@xmath24 analysis .
number of data , background and signal events after all selections for different lq signals . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^ " , ] [ tab : lq3_nub ] ( points plus solid line ) as a function of @xmath37 for the pair production of third generation leptoquarks .
the expected cross section limits are the same as the observed .
the grey shaded band shows the pdf and the renormalization scale error bounds on the nlo production cross section ( solid line ) calculated for @xmath36 .
the long dashed line shows @xmath38 for the @xmath39 = @xmath40 times the phase suppression factor for the @xmath41 channel.,width=302 ]
searches for pair production of leptoquarks of all three generations were performed in 14 fb@xmath25 d0 data samples . all presented analysis
are in good agreement with the sm predictions .
no leptoquarks signals were observed , and a set of 95% c.l .
limits on lq masses have been obtained improving previous tevatron results .
more details on the presented analyses can be found at @xcite . | theories suggest leptoquarks in three generations quark lepton color fractional electric charge lepton baryon numbers scalars or vectors tevatron leptoquarks appear in pairs through @xmath2 annihilation fusion or lepton production @xmath6 contribution last small pair production cross section for scalar leptoquarks depends on strong coupling constant leptoquark mass vector leptoquark production depends on anomalous @xmath7 couplings experimental constrains for three models minimal coupling yang mills minus leptoquarks decay into charged lepton and quark with branching fraction or neutrino and quark with branching fraction frations of leptoquark pairs into final states are @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 report presents summary for leptoquark pair production in data detector during run ii fermilab tevatron collider search explored final state where leptoquarks decay into neutrino and quarks @xmath23 : @xmath24 detector signature is two acoplnar jets missing energy no selection for jet flavorsearch results applied three generations leptoquarks analysis used 2.5 fb@xmath25 d0 run ii data events recorded triggers two acoplanar jets large missing transverse energy two leading jets central region d0 detector transverse momenta greater 35 gev multijet qcd background suppressed @xmath26 greater 75 gev cuts on angular correlations between jets background veto on events isolated electron muon @xmath31 gev applied events isolated track @xmath32 gev rejected two final cuts on @xmath26 @xmath33 optimized for signals minimizing expected upper limit cross section table shows data background signal events after selections for @xmath34 @xmath35 gev leptoquark signals no significant excess data over predicted backround figure shows observed expected 95% c.l. limits on scalar leptoquark pair production cross sections lq mass lower lq mass limit of 214 gev 222 gev obtained intersection experimental cross section limits with nominal theoretical production cross section factorization renormalization scale @xmath36 analysis data background signal events after selections different lq signalscols="^ tab lq3_nub points solid line function @xmath37 pair production third generation leptoquarks expected cross section limits same observed grey band shows pdf renormalization scale error bounds nlo production cross section @xmath36 long dashed line shows @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 phase suppression factor @xmath41 channel searches pair production leptoquarks three generations 14 fb@xmath25 d0 data samples sm predictions no leptoquarks signals observed 95% c.l limits lq masses improving tevatron results details @xcite | 0.183226 | 1,132 | 556 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
199,138 | a meson - exchange @xmath0 model , previously constructed using three - dimensional reduction scheme of the bethe - salpeter equation for a model lagrangian involving @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 fields , is extended to energies up to 2 gev by including the @xmath7 channel and all the four stars @xmath0 resonances up to the @xmath8waves .
the effects of other @xmath9 channels are taken into account phenomenologically .
the extended model gives an excellent fit to both @xmath0 phase shifts and inelasticity parameters in all channels up to the @xmath8waves .
however , a few of the extracted resonance parameters differ considerably from the pdg values . | pion - nucleon scattering is one of the main sources of information for the baryon spectrum . in addition
, it also plays a fundamental role in the description of nuclear dynamics for which the @xmath0 off - shell amplitude serves as the basic input to most of the existing nuclear calculations at intermediate energies .
knowledge about the off - shell @xmath0 amplitude is also essential in interpreting the experiments performed at the intermediate - energy electron accelerators in order to unravel the internal structure of these hadrons @xcite .
it is hence important to have a sound theoretical description of the @xmath0 interaction .
it is commonly accepted that quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) is the fundamental theory of the strong interaction . however , due to the confinement problem , it is still practically impossible to derive the @xmath0 interaction directly from qcd . on the other hand ,
models based on meson - exchange ( mex ) pictures have been very successful in describing the @xmath10 scattering . over the past decade , mex approach has also been applied by several groups @xcite to construct models for @xmath0 scattering . in previous works we have constructed several mex @xmath0 models within the three - dimensional reduction scheme of the bethe - salpeter equation @xcite and investigated their sensitivity with respect to various three - dimensional reduction schemes .
the model lagrangian included only @xmath11 and @xmath6 fields .
it was found that all the resulting meson - exchange models can yield similarly good descriptions of @xmath0 scattering data up to @xmath12 mev . the model obtained with the cooper - jennings reduction scheme @xcite
was recently extended up to a c.m .
energy of 2 gev in the @xmath13 channel by including the @xmath7 channel and a set of higher @xmath13 resonances @xcite .
the effects of the other @xmath14 channels like the @xmath15 , @xmath16 , and @xmath17 , instead of including them directly in the coupled - channels calculation , were taken into account by introducing a phenomenological term in the resonance propagators .
an excellent fit to the t - matrix in both @xmath0 and @xmath7 channels was obtained . here
we further extend the model to other higher partial waves up to the @xmath8waves .
the mex @xmath0 model we previously constructed was obtained by using a three - dimensional reduction scheme of the bethe - salpeter equation for a model lagrangian involving @xmath18 and @xmath6 fields .
details can be found in ref .
@xcite . as the energy increases , two - pion channels like @xmath19 as well as a non - resonant continuum of @xmath20 states become increasingly important , and at the same time more and more nucleon resonances appear as intermediate states . in ref .
@xcite the @xmath0 model constructed in @xcite was extended for the @xmath13 partial wave by explicitly coupling the @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath21 channels and including the couplings with higher baryon resonances .
for example ,
in the case when there is only one resonance @xmath22 contributing , the hilbert space was enlarged to include a bare @xmath13 resonance @xmath22 which acquires a width by its coupling with the @xmath0 and @xmath7 channels through the lagrangian @xmath23 where @xmath24 and @xmath2 denote the field operators for the nucleon , bare @xmath22 , pion and eta meson , respectively . then the full @xmath25-matrix can be written as a system of coupled equations , @xmath26 where @xmath27 and @xmath28 denote the @xmath1 , or
@xmath2 channel and @xmath29 is the total center mass energy . in general
, the potential @xmath30 is a sum of non - resonant @xmath31 and bare resonance @xmath32 terms , @xmath33 the non - resonant term @xmath34 for the @xmath0 elastic channel contains contributions from the @xmath35- and @xmath36-channel , pseudovector born terms and @xmath25-channel contributions with @xmath37 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 exchange .
the parameters in @xmath34 are fixed from the analysis of the pion scattering phase shifts for the @xmath38 and @xmath39waves at low energies ( @xmath40 mev ) @xcite . in channels involving @xmath2 ,
@xmath41 is taken to be zero since the @xmath42 coupling is very small .
the bare resonance contribution @xmath43 where @xmath44 and @xmath45 denote the bare vertex operator for @xmath46 and bare mass of @xmath22 , respectively , arises from the excitation and de - excitation of the resonance @xmath22 .
the matrix elements of the potential @xmath47 can be symbolically expressed in the form @xmath48 where @xmath49 and @xmath50 are the pion ( or eta ) momenta in the initial and final states , and @xmath51 is the resonance vertex couplings . as in @xcite
, we associate with each external line of the particle @xmath52 in a feynman diagram a covariant form factor @xmath53^{n_\alpha}$ ] , where @xmath54 , @xmath55 , and @xmath56 are the four - momentum , mass , and cut - off parameter of particle @xmath52 , respectively , and @xmath57 . as a result , @xmath58 depends on the product of three cut - off parameters . in eq .
( [ v_r1 ] ) we have included a phenomenological term @xmath59 in the resonance propagator to account for the @xmath14 decay channel .
therefore , our `` bare '' resonance propagator already contains some renormalization or `` dressing '' effects due to the coupling with the @xmath14 channel . with this prescription
we assume that any further non - resonant coupling mechanisms with the @xmath14 channel are small .
the form of @xmath59 can be found in @xcite and is characterized by two parameters , a cut - off @xmath60 and the @xmath9 decay width at the resonance @xmath61 .
consequently , one isolated resonance will contain five free parameters , @xmath62 and @xmath63 .
the generalization of the coupled channels model to the case of @xmath3 resonances with the same quantum numbers is then given by @xmath64 with free parameters for the bare masses , @xmath9 widths , coupling constants , and cut - off parameters for each resonance .
after solving the coupled channel equations , the next task is the extraction of the physical ( or `` dressed '' ) masses , partial widths , and branching ratios of the resonances .
it is well - known this procedure is definitely model dependent , because the background and the resonance contributions can not be separated in a unique way . in this work
, we employ the procedure used in ref .
@xcite where , in the case of pion - nucleon elastic scattering with only one resonance contributing , the full t - matrix is written as follows , @xmath65 where @xmath66 the `` background '' @xmath67 includes contributions not only from the background rescattering but also from intermediate resonance excitation .
this is compensated by the fact that the resonance contribution @xmath68 now contains only the terms that start with the bare resonance vertex . in terms of self - energy and
vertex functions , one obtains the result @xcite @xmath69 where @xmath70 @xmath71 describes the dressed vertex of @xmath72 @xcite .
@xmath73 is the self - energy of the dressed @xmath22 arising from one - pion intermediate states and @xmath74 with @xmath75 .
the information about the physical mass and the total width of the resonance @xmath22 are contained in the dressed resonance propagator given in eq .
( [ tr_dmt2 ] ) .
the complex self - energy @xmath76 leads to a shift from the real `` bare '' mass to a complex and energy - dependent value .
we characterize the resonance by energy - independent parameter that is obtained by solving the equation @xmath77 the solution of this equation , @xmath78 , corresponds to the energy at which the dressed propagator in eq .
( [ tr_dmt2 ] ) is purely imaginary . the `` physical '' or `` dressed '' mass and the width of the resonance is then defined by , @xmath79 when there are n resonances contributing in the same channel , eq .
( [ dmt ] ) can be generalized to take the form of @xmath80 the contribution from each resonance @xmath81 can be expressed in terms of the bare @xmath82 and dressed @xmath83 vertex operators as well as the resonance self energy derived from one - pion @xmath84 and two - pion @xmath85 channels , that is @xmath86 where @xmath87 is the bare mass of @xmath81 .
the vertices for resonance excitation are obtained , in analogous to eqs .
( [ dmt]-[sigma_delta ] ) , from the following two equations : @xmath88 where @xmath89 .
the one - pion self - energies corresponding to eq .
( [ sigma_delta ] ) , is @xmath90 .
we wish to emphasize that in the formulation we present above , namely in eqs .
( [ t_pin]-[dmt_bcr ] ) , the n resonances are treated in a completely symmetrical way and the self - energy and the dressing of any resonance receive contributions from all other resonances .
in fig . 1 , we compare our results for the real and imaginary parts of the t - matrix in some selected channels in @xmath91 and @xmath8waves up to 2 gev c.m .
energy with the experimental data as obtained in the said partial wave analysis @xcite .
one sees that we are able to describe the data very well .
the bare and physical resonance masses , and widths extracted according to eq .
( [ mass - width ] ) are presented in table 1 . even though our model describes the data for t - matrix well as seen in fig .
1 , the resonance properties we extract as given in table 1 do show several differences when compared with pdg values @xcite .
the most notable ones are that ( 1 ) .
we require two resonances not listed in pdg : @xmath92 and @xmath93 ; ( 2 ) .
the masses and widths we obtain for the 2nd and 3rd resonances in @xmath94 and @xmath95 deviates substantially from the pdg values .
the pdg values for @xmath96 for these resonances are @xmath97 and @xmath98 ; ( 3 ) .
the width we obtain for @xmath99 is only 58 mev which is much smaller that the pdg value of @xmath100 mev .
.bare @xmath45 and physical @xmath101 resonance masses and total width in mev . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
we have extended our previously constructed meson - exchange @xmath102 model to energies up to 2 gev by including the @xmath7 channel and all the four stars @xmath0 resonances up to the @xmath8waves .
the effects of other @xmath9 channels are taken into account phenomenologically .
we have treated , in any given channel , all the contributing resonances in a completely symmetrical manner such that every resonance is dressed by the presence of all other resonances .
the extended model gives an excellent fit to both @xmath102 phase shifts and inelasticity parameters in all channels up to the @xmath8waves .
however , a few of the resonance parameters differ substantially from the pdg values .
this @xmath0 model will be applied to evaluate the contribution of the pion cloud to the photopion reactions up to 2 gev c.m .
energy as was done in ref .
@xcite so that the photoexcitation strengths of all resonances below 2 gev can be reliably extracted . | pion - nucleon scattering information baryon spectrum fundamental nuclear dynamics @xmath0 off - shell amplitude basic input nuclear calculations at intermediate energies knowledge off - shell @xmath0 amplitude essential interpreting experiments intermediate - energy electron accelerators internal structure hadrons important sound theoretical description @xmath0 interaction quantum chromodynamics fundamental theory strong interaction confinement problem impossible to derive @xmath0 interaction directly from qcd models meson - exchange mex ) pictures successful describing @xmath10 scattering mex approach applied by groups models @xmath0 scattering previous constructed mex @xmath0 models three - dimensional reduction scheme bethe - salpeter equation investigated sensitivity schemes model lagrangian included @xmath11 @xmath6 fields meson - exchange models good descriptions @xmath0 scattering data up to @xmath12 mev model cooper - jennings reduction scheme extended to c.m . energy 2 gev in @xmath13 channel including @xmath7 channel higher @xmath13 resonanceseffects @xmath14 channels coupled - channels calculation phenomenological term in resonance propagators fit to t - matrix in @xmath0 @xmath7 channels extend model to higher partial waves @xmath8waves mex @xmath0 model three - reduction scheme bethe - salpeter equation model lagrangian @xmath18 @xmath6 fields details in ref . @xcite energy increases two - pion channels like @xmath19 non - resonant continuum @xmath20 states important more nucleon resonances appear as intermediate states @xcite @xmath0 model extended for @xmath13 partial wave coupling @xmath1 channels including couplings with higher baryon resonances one resonance @xmath22 hilbert space enlarged to bare @xmath13 resonance @xmath22 width coupling with @xmath0 @xmath7 channels @xmath23 @xmath24 denote field operators for nucleon @xmath22 pion eta meson full @xmath25-matrix as system coupled equations @xmath26 @xmath27 denote channel @xmath29 total center mass energypotential @xmath30 sum non - resonant @xmath31 bare resonance @xmath32 terms non - resonant @xmath34 channel contains contributions @xmath35-channel pseudovector terms @xmath25-channel contributions @xmath37 @xmath6 exchange parameters @xmath34 fixed from analysis pion scattering phase shifts @xmath38 @xmath39waves low energies channels @xmath2 @xmath41 zero @xmath42 coupling small bare resonance contribution @xmath43 bare vertex operator @xmath46 mass @xmath22 arises from excitation de - excitation resonance @xmath22 matrix elements potential @xmath47 expressed @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 pion momenta initial final states @xmath51 resonance vertex couplings each external line particle @xmath52 covariant form factor @xmath53 @xmath54 four - momentum mass cut - off parameter of particle @xmath52 @xmath57 @xmath58 depends on product three cut - off parameters included phenomenological term @xmath59 in resonance propagator @xmath14 decay channelresonance propagator contains renormalization effects due to coupling @xmath14 channel further non - resonant coupling mechanisms small form @xmath59 in @xcite characterized by two parameters cut - off @xmath60 @xmath9 decay width at resonance @xmath61 one isolated resonance five free parameters @xmath62 @xmath63 generalization coupled channels model to @xmath3 resonances same quantum numbers given by @xmath64 with free parameters for bare masses @xmath9 widths coupling constants cut - off parameters each resonance equations next task extraction of physical masses partial widths branching ratios of resonances procedure model dependent background resonance contributions procedure in @xcite pion - nucleon elastic scattering one resonance full t - matrix @xmath65 @xmath66 background @xmath67 includes contributions background intermediate resonance excitation resonance contribution @xmath68 contains terms start with bare resonance vertex result @xcite @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 describes dressed vertex of @xmath72 @xcite@xmath73 self - energy dressed @xmath22 from one - pion states @xmath74 @xmath75 information physical mass total width resonance @xmath22 in dressed resonance propagator eq . tr_dmt2 complex self - energy @xmath76 shift from bare mass to complex energy - dependent value resonance energy - independent parameter solving equation @xmath77 solution @xmath78 corresponds to energy dressed propagator imaginary physical mass width resonance defined by @xmath79 n resonances same channel generalized @xmath80 contribution from each resonance @xmath81 expressed bare @xmath82 dressed @xmath83 vertex operators resonance self energy from one - pion @xmath84 two - pion @xmath85 channels @xmath86 @xmath87 bare mass of @xmath81 vertices for resonance excitation obtained from equations @xmath88 @xmath89 one - pion self - energies corresponding to eq @xmath90 emphasize formulation eqs .t_pin]-[dmt_bcr n resonances treated self - energy dressing receive contributions from resonances fig . 1 compare results for real imaginary parts t - matrix channels @xmath91 @xmath8waves up to 2 gev c.m energy with experimental data partial wave analysis @xcite data bare physical resonance masses widths extracted presented in table 1 model describes data resonance properties show differences compared with pdg values @xcite require two resonances not listed in pdg @xmath92 @xmath93 masses widths for 2nd 3rd resonances in @xmath94 @xmath95 deviates from pdg values pdg values for @xmath96 resonances are @xmath97 @xmath98 width for @xmath99 58 mev smaller that pdg value of @xmath100 mev @xmath45 physical @xmath101 resonance masses total width in mev extended meson - exchange @xmath102 model to energies up to 2 gev including @xmath7 channel four stars @xmath0 resonances up to @xmath8waveseffects of @xmath9 channels phenomenologically treated contributing resonances symmetrical every resonance dressed by resonances extended model fit to @xmath102 phase shifts inelasticity parameters in channels up to @xmath8waves resonance parameters differ from pdg values @xmath0 model evaluate contribution pion cloud to photopion reactions up to 2 gev c.m energy photoexcitation strengths of resonances below 2 gev extracted | 0.43233 | 2,664 | 1,389 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,141 | we present a semiclassical two fluid model for an interacting bose gas confined in an anisotropic harmonic trap and solve it in the experimentally relevant region for a spin polarized gas of @xmath0rb atoms , obtaining the temperature dependence of the internal energy and of the condensate fraction .
our results are in agreement with recent experimental observations by ensher .
# 1#1 bose
einstein condensation ( bec ) has recently been realized in dilute vapours of spin polarized alkali atoms , using advanced techniques for cooling and trapping@xcite .
these condensates consist of several thousands to several million atoms confined in a well which is generated from nonuniform magnetic fields .
the confining potential is accurately harmonic along the three cartesian directions and has cylindrical symmetry in most experimental setups .
the determination of thermodynamic properties such as the condensate fraction and the internal energy as functions of temperature is at present of primary interest in the study of these condensates@xcite .
the nature of bec is fundamentally affected by the presence of the confining potential@xcite and finite size corrections are appreciable , leading for instance to a reduction in the critical temperature@xcite .
interaction effects are very small in the normal phase but become significant with the condensation
induced density increase .
the correction to the transition temperature due to interactions has been recently computed by giorgini @xcite .
the temperature dependence of the condensate fraction was recently measured@xcite for a sample of around 40000 @xmath0rb atoms , the observed lowering in transition temperature being in agreement with theoretical predictions within experimental resolution . in the same work the internal energy was measured during ballistic expansion and found to be significantly higher in the bec phase than predicted by the ideal gas model . while the increase is easily understood as a consequence of the interatomic repulsions ,
a quantitative estimate is still lacking . in this work
we present a two fluid mean field model which is able to explain the above mentioned effects , giving results in agreement with experiment for both the condensate fraction and the internal energy as functions of temperature .
we describe the condensate by means of the gross pitaevskii ( gp ) equation for its wave function @xmath1 , @xmath2 where @xmath3 , @xmath4 being the scattering length , @xmath5 is the confining potential and @xmath6 is the average non condensed particle distribution .
the factor @xmath7 in the third term arises from exchange@xcite and we neglect the term involving the off diagonal density of non condensed particles .
following bagnato @xcite we treat the non condensed particles as non interacting bosons in an effective potential @xmath8 .
thermal averages are computed with a standard semiclassical bose
einstein distribution in chemical equilibrium with the condensate , i.e. at the same chemical potential @xmath9 . in particular , the density @xmath6 is @xmath10 we fix the chemical potential from the total number of particles @xmath11 @xmath12 where @xmath13 and the semiclassical density of states is @xmath14 this completes the self consistent closure of the model
. equation ( [ eqgp ] ) can be solved analytically in the experimentally relevant situation @xmath15 and @xmath16 , where @xmath17 . except for a small region close to the phase transition
the interaction parameter @xmath18 entering the gp equation is large and the kinetic energy can be neglected .
this yields @xmath19 where @xmath20 ( @xmath21 ) for @xmath22 ( @xmath23 ) .
the present strong coupling solution neglects the condensate zero point energy @xmath24 .
as giorgini , pitaevskii and stringari@xcite pointed out finite size effects are thereby excluded . before presenting the complete numerical solution of the self consistent model defined by equations ( [ eqserien1])([eqpsir ] ) and comparing its predictions with existing experimental data@xcite , we display perturbative solutions at zero and first order . an approximate semi
analytical solution can be obtained by treating perturbatively interactions involving the `` dilute gas '' of non condensed particles . to zero order in @xmath25
we have @xmath26 and equation ( [ eqrhodef ] ) gives @xmath27 \label{eqrhoc}\ ] ] for @xmath28 and @xmath29 for @xmath30 .
the self consistent zero
order solution is then completed by equation ( [ eqntot ] ) .
we remark that no assumption of weak interactions _ within the condensate _ has been made .
we now proceed to compute the first order correction to the above zero order solution .
we take @xmath31 and expand equation ( [ eqrhodef ] ) to first order in @xmath32 $ ] .
the choice of the expansion parameter @xmath32 $ ] ensures that the perturbative expansion is regular , since the correction to @xmath33 vanishes where the zero order term vanishes . with the additional approximation @xmath34 in the first order term
we get @xmath35 where @xmath36\ ] ] @xmath37 being the kummer confluent hypergeometric function .
the self
consistent first
order solution is then completed by equation ( [ eqntot ] ) .
we have solved numerically the simplified two fluid model , first treating the parameter @xmath38 to all orders ( equations [ eqserien1][eqpsir ] ) , then to zero order ( equations [ eqntot ] and [ eqn0mu][eqn0sopratc ] ) and finally to first order ( equations [ eqntot ] and [ eqn0approx][eqrho1e ] ) .
each case involves solving the integral equation ( [ eqntot ] ) to obtain @xmath9 as a function of @xmath11 and @xmath39 ; the non perturbative solution also involves the local nonlinear problem posed by equations ( [ eqserien1 ] ) and ( [ eqpsir ] ) . the small differences between our three results justify _ a posteriori _ a perturbative treatment .
experimental parameters are taken from the work of ensher @xcite : @xmath40 , @xmath41 and @xmath42 .
we have verified numerically that our results depend weakly on @xmath11 in the region explored in the experiments and therefore have used a fixed @xmath41 in all our computations .
we use as energy units the semiclassical ideal gas critical temperature @xmath43 , @xmath44 being the riemann zeta function .
figure [ fign0 ] compares the temperature dependence of the condensate fraction @xmath45 with the experimental results of ensher @xcite .
lowering of the transition temperature due to interactions is clearly visible , even if the smoothness of our results around the transition prevents a precise assessment of an interaction induced shift in @xmath46 from the numerical solution . it should be noticed that the strong coupling solution of the gp equation is not valid for @xmath39 close to @xmath46 , since it requires @xmath47 , and that our mean field model does not include critical fluctuations .
both effects being relevant only in a narrow window around @xmath46@xcite , we expect our results to be meaningful in most of the temperature range .
recently giorgini @xcite solved numerically the popov approximation to the finite temperature generalization of the gp equation within a semiclassical wkb approximation .
their results for the temperature dependence of the condensate fraction are in very good agreement with the predictions of our more naive model except for @xmath48 , where they find a sharp change in the slope of @xmath49 .
their result for the interaction induced shift in critical temperature @xmath50 is also in good agreement with our curves .
figure [ figeqst ] reports our results for the temperature dependence of the internal energy .
we remark that the experimentally measured quantity is the sum of the kinetic energy and of the interaction energy , not including the confinement potential energy due to the rapid switching off of the trapping potential@xcite .
the average single particle energy @xmath51 - 1\right\ } $ ] obtained from the semiclassical density of states contains twice the interaction energy , and assuming that on average the kinetic and potential terms are equal is twice the measured quantity .
the kinetic energy of condensed atoms is negligible in our strong coupling limit and their interaction energy per particle is @xmath52 .
the quantity directly comparable to the experimental data is therefore @xmath53 , which we plot in figure [ figeqst ] obtaining good agreement with the measured values .
the calculated internal energy does not contain any sharp feature at transition , paralleling the result discussed above for the condensate fraction .
correspondingly the rapid rise in the specific heat is considerably smoothed with respect to the ideal
gas result ( see figure [ figcv ] ) . apart from this small region around transition , our results on @xmath54 above and below @xmath46 imply a significant reduction of the increase in specific heat across the phase transition . in conclusion , we have presented a mean field , semiclassical two fluid model and discussed its perturbative and non perturbative solution in the experimentally relevant parameter range .
our results on the temperature dependence of the condensate fraction and of the internal energy are in agreement with recent experimental measurements , accounting for the pronounced increase in internal energy with respect to the noninteracting boson case measured below @xmath46 .
we have also verified that our model reproduces the results obtained for the condensate fraction with a more refined theory by giorgini . | we thank dr e. a. cornell for making his data available to us prior to publication | thank dr e. cornell data available publication | 0.065387 | 21 | 9 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
199,147 | we investigate the ray dynamics in an optical cavity when a ray splitting mechanism is present . the cavity is a conventional two - mirror stable resonator and the ray splitting
is achieved by inserting an optical beam splitter perpendicular to the cavity axis .
using hamiltonian optics , we show that such a simple device presents a surprisingly rich chaotic ray dynamics .
= 0.8truecm pacs numbers : 42.60.da , 42.65.sf , 42.15.-i in this letter we present a very simple optical cavity whose ray dynamics is nevertheless fully chaotic .
our starting point is the fact that a two - mirror optical cavity can be _ stable _ or _ unstable _ depending on its geometrical configuration @xcite .
if a light ray is injected inside the cavity it will remain confined indefinitely when the configuration is stable but it will escape after a finite number of bounces when the cavity is unstable .
our interest is in a cavity which has both aspects of stability and instability ( fig [ fig:1 ] ) .
the cavity is modelled as a strip resonator @xcite made of two identical concave mirrors of radius of curvature @xmath0 separated by a distance @xmath1 , where @xmath2 so that the cavity is globally stable .
we then introduce a beam splitter ( bs ) inside the cavity , oriented perpendicular to the optical axis . in this way
the bs defines two planar - concave subcavities : one on the left and one on the right with respect to the bs , with length @xmath3 and @xmath4 , respectively .
the main idea is that depending on the position of the bs the left ( right ) subcavity becomes _ unstable _ for the reflected rays when @xmath3 ( @xmath4 ) is bigger than @xmath0 , while the cavity as a whole remains always _ stable _ ( @xmath5 ) .
consideration of this system raises the nontrivial question whether there will be an `` equilibrium '' between the number of trapped rays and escaping rays .
the trapped rays are those which bounce for infinitely long times due to the global stability of the cavity and the escaping ones are those which stay only for a finite time .
if such equilibrium exists it could eventually lead to transient chaos since it is known in literature that instability ( positive lyapunov exponents ) and mixing ( confinement inside the system ) form the skeleton of chaotic dynamics @xcite . in this letter
we show that under certain conditions such equilibrium can be achieved in our cavity and that chaotic ray dynamics is displayed + in our system the bs plays a crucial role .
it is modelled as a stochastic ray splitting element by assuming the reflection and transmission coefficients as random variables @xcite . within the context of wave optics
this model corresponds to the neglect of all interference phenomena inside the cavity , as required by the ray ( zero - wavelength ) limit .
the stochasticity is implemented by using a monte carlo method to determine whether the ray is transmitted or reflected @xcite . when a ray is incident on the ray splitting surface of the bs , it is either transmitted through it , with probability @xmath6 , or reflected with probability @xmath7 , where we assume @xmath8 for a @xmath9 beam splitter as shown in fig [ fig:1 ] .
we then dynamically evolve a ray and at each reflection we use a random number generator with a uniform distribution to randomly decide whether to reflect or transmit the incident ray .
+ in the context of hamiltonian optics , to characterize the trajectory of a ray we first choose a reference plane perpendicular to the optical axis @xmath10 , coinciding with the surface of the bs .
the intersection of a ray with this plane is specified by two parameters : the height @xmath11 above the optical axis and the angle @xmath12 between the trajectory and the same axis .
we consider the rays as point particles , as in standard billiard theory where the propagation of rays correspond to the trajectories of unit mass point particles moving freely inside the billiard and reflecting elastically at the boundary .
in particular , we study the evolution of the transversal component of the momentum of the ray , i.e. @xmath13 so that we associate a ray of light with the two - dimensional vector @xmath14 .
it is important to stress that we use exact 2d - hamiltonian optics , i.e. we do _ not _ use the paraxial approximation .
+ the evolution of a set of rays injected in the cavity with different initial conditions @xmath15 , is obtained by using a ray tracing algorithm . for each initial condition ,
the actual ray trajectory is determined by a random sequence \{ ...
rrttrrrrt .. } which specifies if the ray is reflected ( r ) or transmitted ( t ) by the bs .
when one evolves the whole set of initial conditions , one can choose between two possibilities , either use the _ same _ random sequence for all rays in the set of initial conditions or use a _ different _ random sequence for each ray . in this letter
we use the _ same _ random sequence for all injected rays in order to uncover the dynamical randomness of the cavity .
+ the three quantities that we have calculated to demonstrate the chaotic ray dynamics inside the cavity are the poincar surface of section ( sos ) , the exit basin diagrams and the escape time function @xcite . in all calculations we have assumed @xmath16 m and the radius of curvature of the mirrors @xmath17 m ; the diameter @xmath18 of the two mirrors was @xmath19 m .
in addition , the displacement @xmath20 of the bs with respect to the center of the cavity was chosen as @xmath21 m ( unless specified otherwise ) , and the time was measured in number of bounces @xmath22 .
+ in fig .
[ fig:2 ] , the successive intersections of a ray with initial transverse coordinates @xmath23 m , @xmath24 are represented by the black points in the soss . for @xmath25
the cavity configuration is symmetric and the dynamics is completely regular ( fig.[fig:2](a ) ) ; the on - axis trajectory represents an elliptic fixed point and nearby stable trajectories lie on continuous tori in phase space . in fig.[fig:2](b ) , the bs is slightly displaced from the center ( @xmath26 m ) , the same initial trajectory becomes unstable and spreads over a finite region of the phase space before escaping after a large number of bounces ( @xmath27 ) . in view of the ring structure of fig.[fig:2](b ) we may qualify the motion as azimuthally ergodic .
the fact that the ray - splitting mechanism introduced by the bs produces ergodicity is a well known result for a closed billard @xcite .
we find here an analogue phenomenon , with the difference that in our case the trajectory does not explore uniformly but only azimuthally the available phase space , as an apparent consequence of the openness of the system .
+ it is well known that chaotic hamiltonian systems with more than one exit channel exhibit irregular escape dynamics which can be displayed , e.g. , by plotting the exit basin diagram @xcite . in our system , this diagram was constructed by defining a fine grid ( @xmath28 ) of initial conditions @xmath15 . each ray is followed until it escapes from the cavity .
when it escapes from above ( @xmath29 ) we plot a black dot in the corresponding initial condition , whereas when it escapes from below ( @xmath30 ) we plot a white dot .
this is shown in fig.[fig:3 ] , the uniform regions in the exit basin diagram correspond to rays which display a regular dynamics , whereas the dusty regions correspond to portions of phase space where there is sensitivity to initial conditions , since two initially nearby points can escape from opposite exits .
moreover , in fig.[fig:3 ] one can see how the boundary between black and white regions becomes less and less smooth as one approaches the center of these diagrams .
it is known that this boundary is actually a fractal set @xcite whose convoluted appearance is a typical feature of chaotic scattering systems @xcite .
+ besides sensitivity to initial conditions , another fundamental ingredient of chaotic dynamics is the presence of infinitely long living orbits which are responsible for the mixing properties of the system .
this set of orbits is usually called repeller @xcite , and is fundamental to generate a truly chaotic scattering system . to verify the existence of this set we have calculated the escape time or time delay function @xcite for a one - dimensional set of initial conditions specified by the initial position @xmath31 ( impact parameter ) taken on the mirror @xmath32 and the initial velocity @xmath24 .
the escape time was calculated in the standard way , as the time ( in number of bounces @xmath22 ) it takes a ray to escape from the cavity .
+ fig.[fig:4](a ) shows the escape time function .
the singularities of this function are a clear signature of the existence of long living orbits and the presence of peaks followed by flat regions are a signature of the exponential sensitivity to initial conditions . in order to verify the presence of an _ infinite _ set of long living orbits , we have zoomed in on the set of impact parameters @xmath31 in three different intervals ( fig .
[ fig:4](b ) , ( c ) and ( d ) ) .
each zoom reveals the existence of new infinitely long living orbits .
infinite delay times correspond to orbits that are asymptotically close to an unstable periodic orbit .
if we would continue to increase the resolution we would find more and more infinitely trapped orbits .
the repeated existence of singular points is a signature of the mixing mechanism of the system due to the global stability of the cavity . + in conclusion , we have demonstrated that our simple optical system displays chaotic ray dynamics .
it is important to stress that a key component for the development of chaos is the inclusion of non - paraxial rays which add the mixing properties to the system @xcite .
in fact , it has been previously shown that paraxial ray dynamics can be unstable but not chaotic , in systems with stochastic perturbations @xcite . in our case , it is the stochastic ray splitting mechanism induced by the bs that destroys the regular motion of rays in the globally stable ( but non - paraxial ) cavity , as shown by the soss . moreover , by calculating the exit basin diagrams we have found that they show fractal boundaries , which is a typical feature of chaotic ray dynamics @xcite .
finally , through the singularities in the escape time function , we have verified the presence of infinitely long living orbits , which in turns reveal the mixing mechanism of our optical cavity .
an experimental confirmation of the fractal properties of the exit basin can be performed , e.g. , in the way suggested in @xcite , by injecting a narrow laser beam into the cavity either in a regular or in a dusty region of phase space . in the former case one
expects the beam to leave the cavity either from above or below , while in the latter case both exits should appear illuminated .
this proposed experiment is fully within the context of geometrical optics ( interference plays no role ) so that our stochastic model of the bs is adequate .
+ this project is part of the program of fom and is also supported by the eu under the ist - atesit contract . we thank s. oemrawsingh for useful contributions to software development .
+ a16 a. e. siegman , _ lasers _ ( university science books , mill valley , ca , 1996 ) .
p. cvitanovi _
et al . , classical and quantum chaos _
( www.nbi.bk/chaosbook/ , 2002 ) .
l. couchman , e. ott , and t. m. antonsen , jr .
, phys .
rev .
a * 46 * , 6193 ( 1992 ) .
e. ott .
_ chaos in dynamical systems _ ( cambridge university press , 2002 ) , 2nd ed .
s. bleher , c. grebogi , e. ott , and r. brown , phys .
rev . a * 38 * , 930 ( 1988 ) .
s. ree and l. e. reichl , phys . rev .
e * 65 * , 055205(r ) ( 2002 ) .
d. sweet , e. ott and j. a. yorke , nature * 399 * , 315 ( 1999 ) .
p. gaspard , _ chaos , scattering and statistical mechanics_(cambridge university press , 1998 ) , 1st ed .
s. bleher and c. grebogi and e. ott , physica d * 46 * , 87 - 121 ( 1990 ) .
a. aiello , m.p .
van exter , and j. p. woerdman , phys .
rev .
e * 68 * , 046208 ( 2003 ) .
s. longhi , phys .
rev .
e * 65 * , 027601 ( 2002 ) .
g. puentes , a. aiello , and j. p. woerdman , submitted to phys .
rev .
e ( 2003 ) . | fig . 1.schematic diagram of the cavity model ; r indicates the radius of curvature of the mirrors . two subcavities of length @xmath33 and @xmath34 are coupled by a bs .
the total cavity is globally stable for @xmath35 .
@xmath36 represents the displacement of the bs with respect to the center of the cavity .
when a ray hits the surface of the bs , which we choose to coincide with the reference plane , it can be either reflected or transmitted with equal probability ; for a @xmath9 beam splitter @xmath8 .
2.sos for ( a ) @xmath25 : the ray dynamics is stable and thus confined on a torus in phase space .
( b ) @xmath37 m , the dynamics becomes unstable and the ray escapes after @xmath27 bounces .
note the ring structure in this plot .
4.(a ) escape time as a function of the initial condition @xmath38 .
( b ) blow up of a small interval along the horizontal axis in ( a ) .
( c ) and ( d ) blow ups of consecutive intervals along the set of impact parameters @xmath38 shown in ( b ) . | fig . 1.schematic diagram cavity model r indicates radius curvature mirrors two subcavities @xmath33 @xmath34 coupled by bs total cavity stable for @xmath35 @xmath36 represents displacement bs center cavity ray hits surface bs reference plane reflected or transmitted equal probability @xmath9 beam splitter @xmath8 @xmath25 ray dynamics stable confined on torus phase space @xmath37 m dynamics unstable ray escapes after @xmath27 bounces ring structure plot escape time function initial condition @xmath38 blow up small interval horizontal axis d blow ups consecutive intervals impact parameters @xmath38 b ) | 0.069596 | 255 | 129 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
199,162 | internal microscopic symmetry of a many body system leads to global constraints .
we obtain explicit forms of the global macroscopic condition assuring that at the microscopic level the evolution respects the overall symmetry .
pacs numbers : 11.30.-j , 24.10.pa , 25.75gz | let us consider a multiparticle interacting system with the internal symmetry taken into account .
the internal symmetry leads to conservation laws which put constraints on the evolution of system .
the problem arises if are there only constraints due to the symmetry conservation ? in the microscopic formulation with symmetry invariant dynamical equations the answer is given by an analysis of corresponding solutions assuming that solutions are known .
we are looking here for global conditions to provide consistency with the overall symmetry of the system .
these conditions should not depend on the exact analytic form of the solutions .
as an example one can take kepler s laws in the classical mechanics which are related to the orbital momentum conservation and can be proved without knowledge of the analytic solutions of newton equations .
another simple example is a case of @xmath0 species of charged particles with individual charges @xmath1 numbers of particles a given by @xmath2 particle numbers are time - dependent but the global charges must be conserved ( exact @xmath3 symmetry ) .
so there is a condition @xmath4 valid for any charge conserving interaction .
our aim@xcite is to find a corresponding condition for non - abelian symmetries . in the non - abelian case
there is a subsidiary condition besides conditions of the type eq .
( [ abcharge ] ) due to the charge conservation .
this is the demand to preserve the internal symmetry group representations during the evolution of the system .
let us consider a system big enough to use methods of statistical physics .
when the system reaches the statistical equilibrium then one can extract contributions from particular irreducible representation of the symmetry group @xcite .
group projection techniques allowed for a consistent treatment of equilibrium systems and gave tools to obtain canonical partition functions corresponding to the system transforming under given representation of the symmetry group .
this technique can also be used for a more general non - static problem .
let us consider a system consisting of particles belonging to multiplets @xmath5 of the symmetry group .
particles from the given multiplet @xmath5 are characterized by quantum numbers @xmath6 related to the symmetry group , and quantum numbers @xmath7 characterizing different multiplets of the same irreducible representation @xmath5 .
the number of particles of the specie @xmath8 is denoted here by @xmath9 these occupation numbers are time dependent until the system reaches the chemical equilibrium .
however , the representation of the symmetry group for the system remains constant in the course of a time evolution .
a multiplicity @xmath10 of the representation @xmath5 in this product is equal to a number of particles which transform under this representation @xmath11 we introduce a state vector @xmath12 in particle number representation .
the probability that @xmath13 particles transforming under the symmetry group representations @xmath14 combine into a state transforming under representation @xmath15 of the symmetry group is given by @xmath16 the projection operator @xmath17 has the form ( see _ e.g. _ @xcite ) @xmath18 here @xmath19 is the character of the representation @xmath15 , @xmath20 is the dimension of the representation , @xmath21 is the invariant haar measure on the group , and @xmath22 is an operator transforming a state under consideration . in particle number representation
the operator @xmath22 is defined as @xmath23 @xmath24 is a matrix elements of the group element @xmath25 corresponding to the representation @xmath26 .
one gets finally @xmath27^{n^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_{\alpha_1 } } } \cdots [ d^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_n\nu_n}]^{n^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_{\alpha_n}}}\,.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath24 is a matrix elements of the group element @xmath25 corresponding to the representation @xmath26 and @xmath28 is an overall permutation normalization factor @xmath29 where @xmath30 are partial factors for particles of the kind @xmath31 @xmath32 the permutation factor gives a proper normalization of state vectors reflecting indistinguishability of particles @xmath33 because of the symmetry conservations all weights in eq.([weights ] ) should be constant @xmath34 introducing here the result of eq.([weights ] ) one obtains @xmath35^{n^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_{\alpha_1}}}\cdots [ d^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_n\nu_n}]^{n^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_{\alpha_n}}}\\ & + & \sum_{j=1}^n \sum_{\nu_{\alpha_j}}\ , \frac{d\,n^{(\alpha_j)}_{\nu_{\alpha_j}}}{dt}\int\limits_g d\mu(g)\bar\chi^{(\lambda)}(g ) [ d^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_1\nu_1}]^{n^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_{\alpha_1 } } } \cdots [ d^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_n\nu_n}]^{n^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_{\alpha_n } } } \log[d^{(\alpha_j)}_{\nu_j\nu_j}]\nonumber\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the integrals which appear in eq.([deriv ] ) can be expressed explicitly in an analytic form for any compact symmetry group .
to write an expression for the time derivative of the normalization factor @xmath36 we perform analytic continuation from integer to continuous values of variables @xmath37 all factorials in eq .
( [ faktor ] ) are replaced by the @xmath38function of corresponding arguments .
we encounter here also the digamma function @xmath39 @xcite @xmath40 this allows to write @xmath41\,.\end{gathered}\ ] ] eq.([deriv ] ) can be written in a form @xmath42 where @xmath43^{n^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_{\alpha_1 } } } \cdots [ d^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_n\nu_n}]^{n^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_{\alpha_n}}}\ ] ] is analytically extended for continuous values of variables @xmath44 this gives @xmath45^{n^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_{\alpha_1 } } } \cdots [ d^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_n\nu_n}]^{n^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_{\alpha_n } } } \log[d^{(\alpha_j)}_{\nu_j\nu_j}]}{\int\limits_g d\mu(g)\bar\chi^{(\lambda)}(g ) [ d^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_1\nu_1}]^{n^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_{\alpha_1 } } } \cdots [ d^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_n\nu_n}]^{n^{(\alpha_n)}_{\nu_{\alpha_n}}}}\,.\end{gathered}\ ] ] eq .
( [ derivp ] ) give a set of conditions related to the internal symmetry of a system .
they are meaningful only for nonzero values of coefficients ( [ weights ] ) .
it is easy to see that coefficients @xmath46 are different from zero only if parameters @xmath47 are consistent with the conservation of the simultaneously measurable charges related to the symmetry group .
a number of such charges is equal to the rank @xmath48 of the symmetry group . for the isospin @xmath49 group that is the third component of the isospin , for the flavor @xmath50 that would be the third component of the isospin and the hypercharge
. in general case one has @xmath48 linear relations between variables @xmath51 what reduces correspondingly the number of independent variables .
let consider a case of isotopic symmetry in a more detailed way .
diagonal matrix elements for the representation @xmath52 in the euler s angles representation have the form @xcite
@xmath53 where @xmath54 and @xmath55 are jacobi polynomials @xmath56\ ] ] the measure @xmath21 for the @xmath49 group in this parametrization has the form @xmath57 = { 1\over{8\pi^2 } } \int\limits^{2\pi}_0d\alpha \int\limits^{2\pi}_0d\gamma \int\limits^{\pi}_0d\beta\sin\beta f[g(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)]\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] there are only three possible nontrivial hadronic isotopic multiplets . these are spinor @xmath58 , vector @xmath59 , and @xmath60 representations .
corresponding @xmath61 functions are [ dfunctions ] @xmath62 the group theoretic factor ( [ otherp ] ) has the form @xmath63^{n^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}}}\cdots [ d^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}m_{j_n}}]^{n^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}}\nonumber}\\ & = & \frac{1}{8\pi^2}\sum_{m =- j}^j\int\limits_0^{2\pi}d\alpha\int\limits_0^{2\pi}d\gamma\int\limits_0^\pi d\beta\sin\beta\,{\text{e}}^{i ( n^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}}m_{j_1}+\cdots+n^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}m_{j_n}-m)(\alpha+\gamma)}\nonumber\\ & & \times d^{(j)}_{mm}(\cos\beta)\left[d^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}m_{j_1}}(\cos\beta)\right]^{n^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1 } } } \cdots\left[d^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}m_{j_n}}(\cos\beta)\right]^{n^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}}\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath64 is a number of particles with the isotopic coordinates @xmath65 .
the nonzero values are obtained only when the arguments of the exponent in eq .
( [ weight1 ] ) vanish @xmath66 for the hadronic system with the given value @xmath67 of the third component of the isospin the factor ( [ otherp ] ) is @xmath68^{n^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}}}\cdots [ d^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}m_{j_n}}]^{n^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}}\nonumber}\\ & = & \frac{1}{8\pi^2}\,\delta_{\tilde m,\,n^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}}m_{j_1}+\cdots+n^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}m_{j_n}}\int\limits_0^{2\pi}d\alpha\int\limits_0^{2\pi}d\gamma\int\limits_0^\pi d\beta\sin\beta\,\nonumber\\ & & \times d^{(j)}_{\tilde m \tilde m}(\cos\beta)\left[d^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}m_{j_1}}(\cos\beta)\right]^{n^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1 } } } \cdots\left[d^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}m_{j_n}}(\cos\beta)\right]^{n^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}}\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] these equations allow to write general forms of the isotopic symmetry factor ( [ otherp ] ) for the hadronic system @xmath69 where @xmath70 the definition ( [ r ] ) and the constraint ( [ m ] ) allow to write @xmath71 this is because @xmath72 and @xmath73 this allows to write eq .
( [ genweight2 ] ) in the form @xmath74 one should notice that this reduction of independent variables is related only to that part of the total weight ( [ weights ] ) which comes from the group theory .
the condition ( [ cond ] ) is obtained when the expression ( [ genweight3 ] ) is multiplied by the combinatoric factor ( [ faktor ] ) .
number of independent variables in the combinatoric factor can be reduced only by conservation laws of corresponding charges of the system . to be more specific
let us consider as an example an iso - singlet system consisting only of pions and nucleons @xcite .
we take as independent variables : @xmath75 - total number of particles , @xmath76 - total baryon number , @xmath77 - total electric charge , @xmath78 - number of neutral pions , @xmath79 - number of neutrons
. then + number of negative pions : @xmath80 number of positive pions : @xmath81 number of protons : @xmath82 + for iso - singlet state @xmath83 and [ partnumb ] @xmath84 let us assume @xcite that this system reaches the chemical equilibrium in the evolution process governed by vlasov - boltzman kinetic equations with the interactions restricted to binary collisions .
then the _ total _ number of particles remains constant but particles ratios are subjected to constraints ( [ cond ] ) . for the given baryon number @xmath76 and the given total number of particles @xmath85 condition @xmath86 gives evolution lines in the @xmath87 plane .
the system evolves along these lines which are here consequences of the isotopic @xmath49 symmetry and baryon number conservation .
the weights ( [ condsingl ] ) expressed by means of variables @xmath88 and calculated according to eqs . ( [ faktorp ] ) and ( [ partnumb ] )
have the form @xmath89 the corresponding evolution lines are shown in fig . [ fig.1 . ] .
we have got relations which are _ necessary _ global conditions to provide consistency with the overall symmetry of the system .
they do not depend on the form of the underlying microscopic interaction .
abelian internal symmetries lead to simple and obvious linear relations as in eq.([abcharge ] ) .
non - abelian internal symmetries lead to nonlinear relations as in eq.([deriv ] ) .
if we knew the solutions of symmetry invariant evolution equations then all those constraints would become identities .
in other case they give a subsidiary information about the system and can be used as a consistency check for approximative calculations . a case of generalized vlasov - boltzman kinetic equations
was considered in @xcite .
new constraints lead to decreasing number of available states for the system during its evolution .
new correlations appear and the change in the thermodynamical behavior can be expected .
this can be observed in hydrodynamical systems formed in high energy heavy ion collisions @xcite .
a challenging point is to find structures which would correspond to chemical potentials when system approaches the equilibrium distribution .
the equilibrium distribution in the presence of constraints can be constructed by the lagrange multipliers method .
the multipliers related to the `` abelian '' constraints , such as eq.([abcharge ] ) , are well known chemical potentials .
multipliers related to the non - abelian " constraints ( [ deriv ] ) are more complicated . because these constraints are nonlinear ones , corresponding multipliers can not be treated as standard additive thermodynamical potentials .
work supported in part by the polish committee for scientific research under contract kbn - 2p03b 030 18 99 l. turko and j. rafelski , _ epj c _ * 18 * , 587 , ( 2001 ) .
+ l. turko and j. rafelski,_macroconstraints from microsymmetries of macrosystems _ , [ hep - th/0011047 ] k. redlich and l. turko , _ z. phys .
_ * c5 * , 201 , ( 1980 ) .
+ l. turko , _ phys .
_ b * 104 * , 153 , ( 1981 ) .
e. p. wigner , _ group theory and its application to the quantum mechanics of atomic spectra _ , ( academic press , new york and london , 1959 ) .
a. r. edmonts , _ angular momentum in quantum mechanics _ , princeton , 1957 m. abramowitz and i. a. stegun ( eds . ) , _ handbook of mathematical functions _ , ( national bureau of standards , applied mathematics series @xmath90 55 , 1964 ) .
elze , j. rafelski and l. turko . , _ phys .
_ * b506 * , 123 ( 2001 ) | consider multiparticle interacting system internal symmetry symmetry leads to conservation laws constraints on evolution problem arises if only constraints due to symmetry conservation ? microscopic formulation symmetry invariant dynamical equations answer by analysis of corresponding solutions looking for global conditions consistency with overall symmetry conditions not depend on analytic form solutions kepler s laws in classical mechanics related to orbital momentum conservation proved without analytic solutions newton equations @xmath0 species of charged particles with individual charges numbers time - dependent global charges conserved condition @xmath4 valid for charge conserving interaction aim to find corresponding condition for non - abelian symmetries subsidiary condition abcharge due to charge conservation demand to preserve internal symmetry group representations during evolution consider system big statistical physics when reaches statistical equilibrium extract contributions from irreducible representation symmetry group group projection techniques consistent treatment of equilibrium systems obtain canonical partition functions system transforming symmetry technique used for general non - static problem consider system particles to multiplets @xmath5 of symmetry groupparticles from multiplet @xmath5 characterized by quantum numbers @xmath6 symmetry group @xmath7 multiplets number of particles specie @xmath8 denoted by @xmath9 numbers time dependent until chemical equilibrium representation symmetry group remains constant time evolution multiplicity @xmath10 of representation @xmath5 equal to particles @xmath11 state vector @xmath12 in particle number representation probability @xmath13 particles transforming under symmetry group representations @xmath14 combine into state under representation @xmath15 given by @xmath16 projection operator @xmath17 has form @xmath19 character of representation @xmath20 dimension representation @xmath21 invariant haar measure @xmath22 operator transforming state particle number representation operator @xmath22 defined as @xmath23 @xmath24 matrix elements of group element @xmath25 representation @xmath26 @xmath27^{n{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_{\alpha_1\nonumber\end{aligned @xmath24 matrix elements group element @xmath25 representation @xmath26 @xmath28 permutation normalization factor @xmath29 @xmath30 partial factors particles @xmath31 @xmath32 permutation factor normalization state vectors indistinguishability particles @xmath33 symmetry conservations weights eq.([weights constant @xmath34 result eq.[weights obtains @xmath35^{n^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_{\alpha_1}}} d^{(\alpha_n)}{\nu_n} \sum_{j=1}\sum{\nu_{\alpha_j}}{d^{\alpha_j)}_{\nu{\alpha_j}}}\limits_g\mu\bar\chi^{\lambda)}{\alpha_1\nu_1\alpha_1{\alpha_n)}{\nu_n\alpha_n\alpha[d^{(\alpha_j)}{\nu_j_j}\nonumber\end{aligned} integrals eq.([deriv expressed form compact symmetry group write expression time derivative normalization factor @xmath36 analytic continuation integer continuous values variables @xmath37 factorials faktor replaced @xmath38function arguments encounter digamma function @xmath39 @xmath40 write @xmath41\{gathered eq.([deriv written form @xmath42 @xmath43^{n^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu_{\alpha_1 d^{\alpha_n)}{\nu_n extended continuous values variables @xmath44 @xmath45^{n^{(\alpha_1)}_{\nu{\alpha_1 d^{\alpha_n)}{\nu_n{n{\alpha_n{\nu\alpha_n[d^{(\alpha_j)}_{\nu_j_j}\limits_g\chi^{ d^{\alpha_1)}{\nu_1{n^{\alpha_1}{\nu\alpha_1 d^{\alpha_n)}{\nu_n_n}{n{\alpha_n{\nu{\alpha_n}}}}{gathered}derivp conditions related internal symmetry system meaningful for nonzero values coefficients coefficients @xmath46 different from zero if parameters @xmath47 consistent with conservation measurable charges symmetry group charges equal to rank @xmath48 of symmetry group isospin @xmath49 group third component of isospin flavor @xmath50 third component isospin hypercharge @xmath48 linear relations between variables @xmath51 reduces number independent variables isotopic symmetry diagonal matrix elements for representation @xmath52 euler s angles form @xcite @xmath53 @xmath54 and @xmath55 are jacobi polynomials measure @xmath21 for @xmath49 group form @xmath57 = { 1\over{8\pi^2 } }\limits\alpha\gamma three possible nontrivial hadronic isotopic multiplets spinor @xmath58 vector @xmath59 @xmath60 representations@xmath61 functions dfunctions @xmath62 group theoretic factor form @xmath63{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}}} d{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n{j{n{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}}\nonumber{1}{8\pi^2}_{m j\limits{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}}m_{j_1}{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}m{j_n}\alpha\gamma d{(j)}_{mm}\beta[d{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1_{j_1}}{n^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}m_{j_n}}{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}} @xmath64 number particles isotopic coordinates @xmath65 nonzero values obtained arguments exponent eq .vanish @xmath66 hadronic system value @xmath67 third component isospin factor @xmath68^{n^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}}} d^{(j_n)}{m_{j_n{j{n^{(j_n)}{m_{j_n}}}\nonumber\frac{1}{8\pi^2}\delta\tilde^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}}m_{j_1}^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}m_{j_n}}\limits{2\pi d^{(j)}\tilde[d^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1}m_{j_1}}{n^{(j_1)}_{m_{j_1[d^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}m_{j_n}}{n^{(j_n)}_{m_{j_n}}} equations allow write general forms isotopic symmetry factor hadronic system @xmath69 @xmath70 definition constraint allow write @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 write eq .genweight2 ] ) form @xmath74 reduction independent variables related to total weight from group theory condition cond ] ) obtained when expression genweight3 ] multiplied by combinatoric factor independent variables reduced by conservation laws charges system iso - singlet system pions nucleons @xcite independent variables @xmath75 total particles @xmath76 total baryon number @xmath77 electric charge @xmath78 neutral pions @xmath79 neutrons negative pions @xmath80 positive pions : @xmath81 protons : @xmath82 iso - singlet state @xmath83 @xmath84 system reaches chemical equilibrium evolution vlasov - boltzman kinetic equations interactions restricted to binary collisions total number particles constant ratios subjected constraints baryon number @xmath76 total number of particles @xmath85 condition @xmath86 evolution lines @xmath87 plane system evolves lines consequences of isotopic @xmath49 symmetry baryon number conservation weights condsingl ] ) expressed variables @xmath88 calculated according eqs faktorp partnumb ] form @xmath89 evolution lines shown fig .relations necessary global conditions consistency with symmetry system depend on microscopic interaction abelian symmetries lead to linear relations eq.([abcharge ] ) non - abelian nonlinear relations eq.([deriv ] ) if solutions of symmetry invariant evolution equations constraints identities give subsidiary information consistency check for calculations generalized vlasov - boltzman kinetic equations considered in @xcite new constraints lead to states evolution new correlations appear change in thermodynamical behavior expected observed in hydrodynamical systems high energy heavy ion collisions challenging find structures to chemical potentials equilibrium distribution equilibrium distribution constructed by lagrange multipliers method multipliers related to abelian constraints eq. known chemical potentials non - abelian constraints complicated constraints nonlinear multipliers not treated as standard additive thermodynamical potentials work supported by polish committee for scientific research - 2p03b 030 18 99 l. turko j. rafelski epj 18 587 2001 )_macroconstraints from microsymmetries of macrosystems - th/0011047 k. redlich l. turkophys . c5 201 1980 ) l. turko 104 153 1981 p. wigner group theory quantum mechanics atomic spectra academic press new york london 1959 r edmonts angular momentum quantum mechanics princeton 1957 abramowitz stegun eds handbook mathematical functions national bureau standards applied mathematics series @xmath90 55 1964 elze j. rafelski l. turko . b506 123 2001 | 0.611465 | 3,736 | 1,944 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,163 | doubly heavy mesons and baryons provide a good platform for testing pqcd .
two high efficient generators bcvegpy and genxicc for simulating the hadronic production of the doubly heavy mesons and baryons have been developed in recent years . in this talk , we present their main idea and their recent progresses . the dominant gluon - gluon fusion mechanism programmed in those two generators are written based on the improved helicity amplitude approach , in which the hard scattering amplitude are dealt with directly at the amplitude level and the numerical efficiency are greatly improved by properly decomposing the feynman diagrams and by fully applying the symmetries among them .
moreover , in comparison to the previous versions , we have updated the programs in order to generate the unweighted meson or baryon events much more effectively within various simulation environments .
the generators can be conveniently imported into pythia to do further hadronization and decay simulation . | heavy quarkonium or baryon has attracted wide attention due to its special features , which provides a good platform for studying the perturbative qcd and the associated non - perturbative physics in the bound state system [ 1 - 4 ] .
for example , the @xmath0 meson and the @xmath1 baryon can be a fruitful laboratory for testing various potential models and understanding the weak decay mechanism for heavy flavors .
systematic studies for the hadronic production of the doubly heavy quarkonium or baryon at the hadronic colliders as tevatron and lhc have been done in the literature [ 5 - 17 ] . in particular ,
two generators bcvegpy and genxicc have been completed and developed in recent years [ 18 - 24 ] , which can be conveniently implemented into pythia [ 25 ] for simulating the @xmath0 meson and @xmath1 baryon events with high efficiency . in the present paper ,
we present their main idea and their recent progresses .
it is noted that in the case of productions of double heavy baryons the diquark is remaining in the coloured state . in this case
the interactions with hadronic residue part may decrease the results of calculations due to disassociation effect [ 26 ] .
therefore , it is worth to mention , that the results of calculations of cross - sections of hadronic production of double heavy baryons are not absolutely identical to the case of production of @xmath0 meson and the obtained results for the calculations of the cross - sections of production of baryons should be considered with care and may be treated as the estimate of upper bound of the values of the cross - sections .
there are gluon - gluon fusion mechanism , or the light quark - anti - quark mechanism , or the extrinsic or intrinsic heavy quark mechanism for the hadronic production of the doubly heavy meson or baryon respectively .
all of which may provide sizable contribution in specific kinematic regions .
it is noted that in most of the kinematic regions ( e.g. large @xmath2 region ) , the dominant production mechanism is the gluon - gluon fusion mechanism , e.g. for the production of the @xmath3-quarkonium , it stands for the production via the process @xmath4+b+\bar{c}$ ] , where @xmath5 $ ] stands for the fock - states @xmath6\rangle$ ] , @xmath7g\rangle$ ] , @xmath8\rangle$ ] , @xmath9g\rangle$ ] , @xmath10\rangle$ ] and @xmath11\rangle$ ] ( with @xmath12 ) within the nonrelativistic qcd [ 27 ] , respectively .
the lowest fock state @xmath6\rangle$ ] corresponds to the usually called @xmath0 meson .
the cases for the hadronic production @xmath1 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 baryons are similar , which can be obtained from the case of @xmath0 meson production by properly transforming the anti - quark line to be the quark line and by properly dealing with the color flows [ 13 ] .
so , in the following , we shall take the gluon - gluon fusion mechanism for the @xmath0 meson production as an explicit example to explain our calculation technology and to show how to improve the events simulation efficiency .
according to the pqcd factorization , the hadronic production cross section is formulated as @xmath15 x}(x_{1},x_{2},\mu_{f},\mu_{r } ) , \label{pqcdf}\ ] ] where @xmath16 is the gluon distribution function in hadron @xmath17 , @xmath18 is the cross section for the relevant inclusive production ( @xmath19+b+\bar{c}$ ] ) . @xmath20 and @xmath21 stand for the factorization scale and renormalization scale respectively .
the generating of phase space and its integration can be done with the help of the routines rambos [ 28 ] and vegas [ 29 ] .
then , the most important part left is to deal with the hard scattering amplitude of the process . at the lowest @xmath22 order
, there are totally 36 feynman diagrams and hence 36 amplitudes for the gluon - gluon fusion @xmath19+b+\bar{c}$ ] . according to the pqcd factorization
, each amplitude can be factorized into two parts , that of perturbative @xmath23 ( all the quarks are on shell ) and that of the nonperturbative @xmath24 $ ] which can be represented by the universal matrix element for each fock state . using the conventional squared amplitude to deal with the amplitude
is a tedious and time - consuming task . to save the time for events simulation , we can deal with the hard scattering amplitude for @xmath25 directly at the amplitude level . in the literature , two ways
have been suggested , i.e. the improved trace technology [ 30 - 33 ] and the helicity amplitude approach [ 34,35 ] . in our generators , we adopt an improved version for the helicity amplitude approach as suggested in ref.[18 ] to simplify the hard scattering amplitude . .
] main idea of the improved helicity amplitude approach is shown in fig.(1 ) . according to the improved helicity amplitude approach [ 15 ] ,
we first pick out all the basic spinor lines , which are constructed by the @xmath26 structure of fermion line , from the whole amplitude , whose remaining parts include the color factors and the scalar part of the propagators that shall be dealt with separately . these basic spinor lines can be simplified by changing the involved space - like momenta to be light - like ones , and then use the relation @xmath27 ( @xmath28 is light - like ) to transform and simplify all the spinor line into expressions of spinor products .
this intermediate step can be done using the standard helicity amplitude approach , cf.refs.[34,35 ] .
next , we construct the basic feynman diagrams ( nine for the gluon - gluon fusion ) by proper combination of these basic spinor lines .
finally , we adopt the symmetries of the gluon - gluon exchanges , the quark line exchanges to construct all the amplitude of the process . one subtle point .
the authors of ref.[34 ] group the feynman diagrams of the process into gauge - invariant subsets . to achieve the goal , one have to introduce extra terms into the feynman rules for the three - gluon and four - gluon vertices , i.e. @xmath29 where @xmath30 , @xmath31 and etc .
are input momenta for the gluons , @xmath32 and @xmath33 are primary feynman rules @xmath34 and @xmath35 and @xmath36 are modified parts @xmath37 \\ g_{abcd}^{\lambda\mu\nu\delta}(p , q , k_{1},k_{2})&= & -f_{ace}f_{bde}\frac{s_{1}^{\lambda}s_{1}^{\mu}s_{1}^{\nu}s_{1}^{\delta } } { ( s_{1}\cdot k_{1})(s_{1}\cdot k_{2})}-f_{ade}f_{bce}\frac{s_{2}^{\lambda}s_{2}^{\mu } s_{2}^{\nu}s_{2}^{\delta}}{(s_{2}\cdot k_{1})(s_{2}\cdot k_{2})},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath38 and @xmath39 . because the modified part of the three gluon vertex is symmetric on the interchange of @xmath30 and @xmath31 , we must be careful to choose the sign of modified part in every associated diagrams so as to make all subsets be gauge invariant .
when adding all extra terms together they will result in the required zero contribution .
then by choosing different gauge for each subset , one can obtain a compact result , when all terms of the amplitude are written according to the helicities of the fermions .
this method is most effective for massless cases . while , for the present massive case ( the quark lines are massive ) , the question is much more involved .
it is noted that the sum of all extra terms involving @xmath35 and @xmath36 will have non - zero contributions , which complicates the final results .
so in the improved helicity amplitude approach , we adopt a unique gauge for the whole amplitude .
this gauge choice also avoids numerical cancelations between very large numbers and the numerical results are much more steady when doing the numerical calculations .
this gauge independence can be adopted as one critical point on checking the rightness of the generator .
another subtle point .
we can further make the amplitude more symmetric by applying a proper decomposition of the amplitude . as shown by fig.(2 ) , this is achieved by decomposing the terms involving three- and/or four - gluon vertices , into terms without self - interactions of gluons ( i.e. into qed - like amplitudes ) .
more over , it is noted that for the massive quark case , in addition to the qed - like feynman diagrams , some more additional qed - like terms need to be introduced .
fortunately , for the present subprocess @xmath23 , these ` extra ' terms are just parts of the diagrams with four - gluon vertices ; i.e. they are one of the three terms within the amplitude involving the four - gluon vertex .
this shows that the whole amplitude is just the recombination of all the basic functions already existed in the 36 feynman amplitudes , which is like a magic .
there are totally nine basic qed - like feynman diagrams for the present process .
thus , only the analytic expressions for those ` basic feynman diagrams ' need to be put in the program precisely , while the non - basic ones can be generated by means of linear combination ( the coefficients can be found in ref.[18 ] ) and/or by properly using the symmetry of all those basic ones . as a final subtle point .
as shown by fig.(3 ) , for the feynman diagrams involving two three - gluon vertices , there are usually two ways to transform them into the qed - like diagrams ; i.e. in the second step there are two ways to move the gluon either to the upper quark line or to the lower quark line respectively .
thus , two extra constraints can be found among the nine ` basic feynman diagrams ' , the program can be further simplified and become more compact .
the flowchart for bcvegpy , which is implemented into pythia , is shown in fig.(4 ) .
the bcvegpy ( or genxicc ) is a fortran programme written in a pythia - compatible format and is written in a modularization structure , one may apply it to various situations or experimental environments conveniently .
it is noted that the lhe format is a standard format that is proposed to store process and event information from the matrix - element - based generators .
one can pass these parton - level information to the event generator as pythia for further simulation . and
bcvegpy will generate a standard lhe data file [ 36 ] that contains useful information of the meson and its accompanying partons , which can be conveniently imported into pythia to do further hadronization and decay simulation .
the schematic structure for the generator bcvegpy is shown in fig.(5 ) . in general , the generator is systematically constructed in seven modules according to their purpose .
each module contains necessary files to fulfill the specific tasks for generating events .
the bcvegpy is dominated by two blocks , i.e. the _ vegas _ block ( in module * phase * ) and the _ event _ block ( in module * generate * ) .
the _ vegas _
block is to generate the importance sampling function .
the _ event _ block is to generate events by using pythia , in a way that all the mentioned processes are implemented into pythia as its external processes .
this is achieved by properly setting the two pythia subroutines upinit and upevnt .
here we modify the _
block not only to generate the sampling importance function but also to store an upper bound of the value of the cross sections in each cell [ 37 - 40 ] ; i.e. an improved and more effective method to generate unweighted events has been programmed [ 21,24 ] based on the mint package [ 40 ] .
the importance sampling function is used to increase the simulation efficiency , while the upper bound value will be used to generate unweighted event if the user want to do the experimental analysis and further simulation .
the upper bound value in each cell is an upper bound for the cross sections and also equals a multidimensional stepwise function , according to which it is easy to generate phase - space points . by using this new hit - and - miss technique
, one can generate the points according to the original distribution .
moreover , in doing the initialization , we will call vegas twice to generate the upper bound grid xmax and also a more precise importance sampling function . in vegas
the integral together with its numerical error are related to the sampling numbers ncall and the iteration times itmx .
so , to generate full events , we suggest the user to do a test running first so as to find an effective and time - saving parameters for vegas .
finally , one can generate events by calling the upevnt subroutine according to the probability proportional to the integrand .
the coming lhc experiment shall provide a better platform to check all the theoretical predications and to learn @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 properties in more detail .
recently some new measurements on @xmath0 meson have been done by lhcb and cdf collaborations [ 41 - 45 ] , in which bcvegpy has been adopted for data analysis . due to their high running efficiency ( because of the using of improved helicity amplitude approach ) , bcvegpy and genxicc are very useful for monte carlo simulation and also for theoretical studies . at the present ,
they have been adopted by most of the groups at lhc and tevatron . the suggesting future super z factory , gigaz program , lep3 , and etc .
, shall also provide good platforms for doubly heavy meson and baryon productions , cf .
refs.[46 - 49 ] .
this talk was based on the works done in collaborations with profs.chang ch , wang jx , qiao cf and dr.wang xy .
this work was supported in part by the fundamental research funds for the central universities under grant no.cqdxwl-2012-z002 , by natural science foundation of china under grant no.11075225 and no.11275280 , and by the program for new century excellent talents in university under grant no.ncet-10-0882 . | heavy quarkonium baryon attracted attention special features platform studying perturbative qcd non - perturbative physics in bound state system [ 1 - 4 ] @xmath0 meson @xmath1 baryon for testing models understanding weak decay mechanism for heavy flavors systematic studies for hadronic production doubly heavy quarkonium at colliders tevatron lhc done [ 5 - 17 ] two generators bcvegpy genxicc completed developed [ 18 - 24 implemented into pythia [ 25 for simulating @xmath0 meson @xmath1 baryon events high efficiency present paper present main idea recent progresses double heavy baryons diquark in coloured state interactions with hadronic residue may decrease results calculations disassociation effect [ 26 ] results calculations cross - hadronic production double heavy baryons not identical to production @xmath0 meson estimate of upper bound values gluon - gluon fusion mechanism light quark - anti - quark mechanism extrinsic heavy quark mechanism for hadronic production doubly heavy meson baryon may provide contribution in specific kinematic regions most regions@xmath2 region dominant production mechanism gluon - gluon fusion mechanism production @xmath3-quarkonium production process @xmath4+b+\bar{c}$ ] @xmath5 $ fock - states @xmath6 @xmath12 ) nonrelativistic qcd lowest fock state @xmath6\rangle$ corresponds @xmath0 meson hadronic production @xmath1 @xmath13 @xmath14 baryons similar obtained @xmath0 meson transforming anti - quark line to quark line dealing with color flows gluon - gluon fusion mechanism for @xmath0 meson production example calculation technology improve events simulation efficiency pqcd factorization hadronic production cross section formulated as @xmath15 x}(x_{1_{2}{pqcdf} @xmath16 gluon distribution function in hadron @xmath17 @xmath18 cross section for relevant inclusive production ( @xmath19+b+\bar{c}$ ] @xmath20 @xmath21 stand for factorization scale renormalization scale generating phase space integration routines rambos 28 vegas [ 29important part hard scattering amplitude lowest @xmath22 order 36 feynman diagrams amplitudes for gluon - gluon fusion @xmath19+b+\bar{c}$ pqcd factorization each amplitude factorized into two parts perturbative @xmath23 and nonperturbative @xmath24 represented by universal matrix element each fock state conventional squared amplitude tedious time - consuming deal with hard scattering amplitude for @xmath25 at amplitude level two ways suggested improved trace technology 30 33 helicity amplitude approach 34,35 adopt improved helicity amplitude approach ref.[18 ] simplify hard scattering amplitude improved helicity amplitude approach in fig.(1 ) pick out basic spinor lines constructed by @xmath26 structure fermion line from amplitude remaining include color factors scalar part propagators spinor lines simplified by changing space - like momenta to light - like ones use relation @xmath27 ( @xmath28 light - like to transform simplify spinor line into expressions spinor products intermediate step standard helicity amplitude approach cf.refs.[34,35 ]construct basic feynman diagrams nine for gluon - gluon fusion combination spinor lines adopt symmetries of gluon - gluon exchanges quark line exchanges construct amplitude process authors of ref.[34 ] group feynman diagrams into gauge - invariant subsets introduce extra terms into feynman rules for three four - gluon vertices @xmath29 @xmath30 input momenta for gluons @xmath32 @xmath33 are primary feynman rules @xmath34 @xmath36 modified parts @xmath37_{abcd}^{\lambda\mu\nu\delta}(p k_{1}_{2}){1}\lambda}s_{1}\delta{1}_{1_{2}}{2}\lambda}s_{2}_{2}{\delta}}{2}\cdot k_{1{2} @xmath38 @xmath39 modified part three gluon vertex symmetric on interchange @xmath30 and @xmath31 choose sign modified part in diagrams subsets gauge invariant adding extra terms together result in zero contribution choosing different gauge for each subset compact result terms amplitude written according to helicities fermions method effective for massless cases present massive case quark lines massive question more involved sum of extra terms involving @xmath35 @xmath36 non - zero contributions complicates final results improved helicity amplitude approach adopt unique gauge for whole amplitude avoids numerical cancelations between large numbers numerical results steady gauge independence critical point on checking rightness generator amplitude symmetric by proper decomposition amplitude decomposing terms involving three- four - gluon vertices into terms without self - interactions gluons qed - like amplitudes for massive quark case additional qed - like terms need introduced for present subprocess @xmath23 extra terms parts of diagrams with four - gluon vertices one of three terms within amplitude involving four - gluon vertexshows amplitude recombination of basic functions in 36 feynman amplitudes like magic nine basic qed - like feynman diagrams for present process analytic expressions for basic diagrams need in program non - basic ones generated by linear combination coefficients in ref.[18 ] using symmetry of basic ones fig.(3 ) feynman diagrams involving two three - gluon vertices two ways to transform into qed - like diagrams two ways move gluon to upper or lower quark line two extra constraints among nine basic feynman diagrams program simplified more compact flowchart for bcvegpy implemented into pythia in fig.(4 ) fortran programme in pythia - compatible format modularization structure to various situations experimental environments lhe format standard format to store process event information from matrix - element - based generators pass parton - level information to event generator pythia for further simulation bcvegpy standard lhe data file useful information meson partons imported into pythia further hadronization decay simulation schematic structure for generator bcvegpy in fig.(5 ) generator constructed in seven modulesmodule contains files generating events bcvegpy dominated by two blocks _ vegas _ _ event _ block vegas block importance sampling function event _ block events pythia processes implemented into pythia achieved by setting pythia subroutines upinit and upevnt modify _ block to generate sampling importance function store upper bound of value cross sections in each cell [ 37 - 40 ] improved method to generate unweighted events programmed based on mint package importance sampling function simulation efficiency upper bound value unweighted event experimental analysis simulation upper bound value cell for cross sections equals multidimensional stepwise function easy to generate phase - space points new hit - and - miss technique generate points according to original distribution initialization call vegas twice to generate upper bound grid xmax precise importance sampling function in vegas integral numerical error related to sampling numbers ncall iteration times itmx to generate full events suggest test running first find effective time - saving parameters for vegas generate events by calling upevnt subroutine according to probability proportional to integrandcoming lhc experiment platform check theoretical predications learn @xmath0 properties new measurements on @xmath0 meson by lhcb cdf collaborations bcvegpy adopted for data analysis high running efficiency improved helicity amplitude approach bcvegpy genxicc useful for monte carlo simulation theoretical studies adopted by groups at lhc tevatron future super z factory gigaz program lep3 provide platforms for doubly heavy meson baryon productions refs.[46 - 49 talk based on with profs.chang ch wang jx qiao cf dr.wang xy supported by fundamental research funds central universities-z002 natural science foundation of china grant.11075225 program for new century excellent talents in university grant | 0.508008 | 3,217 | 1,619 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,176 | this talk presents the detection issues for the lightest slepton @xmath0 at a future @xmath1 tev collider given the dark matter constraints set on the susy mass spectrum by the wmap results .
two methods for measuring its mass @xmath2 and the resulting precision on the dark matter density are briefly discussed in the susy msugra scenario with @xmath3-parity conservation when the mass difference between @xmath2 and that of the lightest neutralino is small ( a few gev ) .
the analysis is performed with tesla parameters in both head - on and crossing angle modes .
# 1#2#3#4#1 * # 2 * , # 3 ( # 4 ) * lal 04 - 100 * + * experimental implications for a linear + collider of susy dark matter scenario * + in2p3-cnrs et universit de paris - sud , bt . 200 ,
bp 34 , f-91898 orsay cedex the talk is based on recent studies [ 1,2 ] motivated by the increasing awareness in the community of the role of an @xmath1 linear collider ( lc ) for a precise determination of the susy parameters which are needed to interpret the dark matter ( dm ) content of the universe .
after the wmap results [ 3 ] leading to an accuracy at the @xmath4 level or @xmath5 in two standard deviation range and awaiting for the planck mission in @xmath6 which aims at @xmath7 , it seems appropriate to check that a lc can do its job properly on this essential topic . in the susy scenario with @xmath3-parity conservation ,
the lightest susy particle ( lsp ) is the lightest neutralino @xmath8 .
this particle is considered as the best candidate to satisfy the cosmological constraints on dm in the universe .
dm constraints have been recently re - examined [ 4 ] within the msugra scenario , confronting the precise predictions obtained after the wmap results .
these data imply , for many of the benchmark points retained , a very small difference between the mass of the lightest slepton ( @xmath0 ) , the susy partner of the @xmath9 , and the lsp mass ( @xmath10 ) since one of the preferred mechanism to regulate the amount of dm in the universe is the so - called ` co - annihilation mechanism ' .
previous studies have shown that the masses of both smuon and lsp can be precisely measured using the so - called end - point method [ 2 ] . here
we shall thus concentrating on the measurement of stau mass , which is relevant as the amount of dm depends critically on it .
two methods are presented for this purpose .
the first is appropriate when the stau mass is comparable to the beam energy and the expected cross section of the stau production is small . the second works when the stau mass is significantly smaller than the beam energy and the stau production cross section is large .
we also address detectability issues related to different collision mode either in head - on or with a half crossing angle of @xmath11mrad .
the end - point method could not applied to the stau analysis as there are additional missing energies arising from neutrinos in subsequent @xmath9 decays .
furthermore , the final state particle is very soft , typically a few gev for @xmath12gev taking benchmark point @xmath13 in [ 4 ] as a working point .
another difficulty comes from the fact that the signal cross section is often many orders of magnitude smaller than that of the standard model ( sm ) processes . for point @xmath13 at center - of - mass energy ( @xmath14 ) of @xmath15gev ,
the cross section of the signal process @xmath16 is around @xmath11fb , which is to be compared with @xmath17fb of the dominant sm background processes @xmath18 and @xmath19 .
the spectator @xmath20 in the background process is however predominantly peaked in the forward direction .
therefore an efficient tagging down to lowest possible angle is crucial in rejecting these background events .
quantitative studies show that the current tagging efficiency of the beam monitor calorimeter , lcal , does not allow for a background free analysis .
such an analysis may be achieved [ 1 ] when the lcal is fully efficient in tagging all spectator @xmath20 having a transverse momentum above @xmath21gev and when additional discriminating variables are used .
one such variable is the scalar sum of transverse momentum with respect to the thrust axis in the plane transverse to the beam directions .
the resulting signal efficiency and background contribution from the dominant processes in the head - on collision are summarized in table [ tab : effevtd ] .
.__the efficiency , the signal and dominant background events in the head - on case for benchmark point d@xmath22 at @xmath23gev . _ _ [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] the program micromegas [ 5 ] has been used to compute the relative uncertainty on the dm density due to the susy mass error measurements .
this program operates without any assumption , in particular it does not rely on the msugra scheme .
results listed in table [ tab : results ] show , as expected , that @xmath24 depends primarily on the precision on the stau and lsp masses .
the analysis , optimized for the d@xmath22 solution , gives satisfactory results except for point j@xmath22 which is almost beyond detectability .
the second method works at higher beam energies but still below the mass thresholds of other sparticles , the idea being at such large energies , the signal cross section is big enough to collect a large event sample .
the analysis also benefits from using explicitly the polarized beams to enhance the signal over background ratio .
the stau mass can then be determined by analyzing the high energy spectrum .
indeed for the same benchmark point @xmath13 , if @xmath14 could be chosen to be at @xmath25gev , sufficiently higher than the stau mass , a more precise stau mass and therefore dm density could be achieved even with a moderately small integrated luminosity of @xmath26pb@xmath27 .
the same method has also been applied to a sps1a inspired model for three different @xmath28 values . again
the precision on the stau mass and dm density improves as @xmath28 increases . to summarize
, our studies have shown that the detection and the mass measurement of the tau slepton , potentially important in view of the cosmological implications , is challenging in the so - called `` co - annihilation '' scenario .
a forward veto to remove the @xmath29 background down to very small angles is essential to reach an almost background free result , adequate to achieve the accuracy implied by the post - wmap results in a model independent analysis . in our analysis with method one
, we have assumed an ideal detector for particle detection but with realistic detector acceptance as expected from a fast simulation program sgv [ 6 ] , developed and tested at lep .
some of the detector capabilities are not yet fully explored , e.g. , the @xmath30 information of the tracking device and possible different decay lengths ( secondary vertex distributions ) between the signal and the background events .
the analysis in terms of the signal and background separation may still be improved using more sophisticated likelihood methods instead of simple cuts .
nevertheless , the stau analysis in collisions with a crossing angle is likely to be more difficult ( thought still feasible ) than in head - on collision , only possible in the tesla scheme . in a warm machine like nlc
, the same conclusion could be reached provided that there is no degradation due to pile - up of several bunches in the forward veto ( this may require some r@xmath31d for a very fast calorimeter ) . | the author is grateful to p. bambade , m. berggren and f. richard for the fruitful collaboration on the mass threshold method and to u. martyn for providing material from his study based on analyzing the energy spectrum .
99 p. bambade , m. berggren , f. richard and z. zhang , hep - ph/0406010 .
u. martyn , hep - ph/0406123 .
bennett _ et al_. , _ astrophys .
j. suppl_. 148 ( 2003 ) 1 .
m. battaglia et al . , _ eur .
j. _ * c33 * ( 2004 ) 273 - 296 , hep - ph/0306219 .
g. blanger et al . , _ comput .
_ * 149 * ( 2002 ) 103 - 120 , hep - ph/0112278 .
m. berggren , sgv 2.31 - a fast and simple program for simulating high energy physics experiments at colliding beam detectors . | author grateful bambade berggren richard collaboration mass threshold method u martyn material study energy spectrum. bambade berggren richard z zhang hep - ph/0406010 martyn hep - ph/0406123 bennett et astrophys 148 ( 2003 ) battaglia al eur 2004 ) 273 - hep - ph/0306219 blanger al comput 149 2002 ) 103 - 120 hep - ph/0112278 berggren sgv 2.31 program simulating high energy physics experiments colliding beam detectors | 0.070399 | 246 | 120 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
199,179 | the study of the multi - strange baryon production in the final state of ultra - relativistic au+au collisions at @xmath0 at rhic gives information on the freeze - out conditions and probably on earlier stages of the collision .
chemical freeze - out temperature @xmath1 as well as the strangeness phase space occupancy factor @xmath2 extracted from statistical models are studied as a function of the collision centrality . @xmath2
saturates at 1 in most central collisions suggesting an equilibration of strange quarks in the medium .
a study of the collective motion of the collision is possible in the framework of a hydrodynamically - inspired model which considers the particles to be emitted from a locally thermalized system . in this view , multi - strange particles seem to develop significant radial transverse flow but smaller than @xmath3,@xmath4,@xmath5 . furthermore , @xmath6 and @xmath7 present an elliptic flow as strong as for previously measured baryons supporting the idea that a fraction of the final collective motion has been developed at an early partonic stage of the collision . | the lattice quantum chromodynamics calculations predict the existence of a transition between a hadronic gas and a quark gluon plasma at a temperature around 170mev in a domain close to the net - baryon free region @xcite .
this deconfined state of quarks and gluons is expected to be formed in ultra - relativistic heavy ion collisions .
the study of the final hadronic state properties of such collisions essentially dominated by the low @xmath8 part of the particle spectra ( the bulk ) via multi - strange particles may provide information on its dynamics from the early stage to the chemical and thermal freeze - out ( fo ) .
+ strange quarks whose mass is comparable to the temperature of the qgp formation are expected to be abundantly produced in the high temperature qgp phase because of parton rescattering and should achieve equilibration @xcite .
hadronization process has been very well described in the framework of statistical model @xcite by adjusting four free parameters , the chemical temperature @xmath1 , the baryon and strange chemical potential @xmath9 and @xmath10 and the strangeness phase space occupancy factor @xmath2 .
this latter provides a measurement of the degree of strangeness equilibration in the system .
its evolution with centrality as well as @xmath1 evolution gives a quantitative measurement of strangeness evolution in the bulk matter .
+ a study of the collective motion of the collision in the framework of a hydrodynamically - inspired model has previously shown that @xmath3 , k , p particles seem to take part to the same transverse collective flow and freeze - out kinetically at a temperature smaller than @xmath1 suggesting an expansion and the cooling of the system between chemical and thermal fo .
concerning multi - strange baryons , it has been suggested that these particles should not develop such significant transverse radial flow due to their presumably small cross section so that they should decouple much earlier in the collision @xcite .
their observed transverse radial flow would then primarily reflects partonic flow behaviour .
elliptic flow due to the initial asymmetry of the system in non - central collisions has also proven to be a good tool for understanding the properties of the early stage of the collisions @xcite .
thus multi - strange baryon elliptic flow could be a valuable probe of the initial partonic system . as flow is an additive quantity , we present both radial transverse flow and elliptic flow measurements of multi - strange baryons in order to disentangle its hadronic and partonic contributions .
8 cm 0.8 all the data presented in this contribution have been collected by the star detector described in @xcite .
multi - strange particles are identified via the topology of their decay @xmath11@xmath12@xmath13 and @xmath14@xmath12@xmath15 then the subsequent decay @xmath16@xmath12@xmath17 with the respective branching ratios 100@xmath18 , 68@xmath18 and 64@xmath18 . for more details
see @xcite .
corrections for tracking efficiency and detector acceptance were applied .
the final corrected transverse momentum distributions are fitted in order to extract yields and inverse slope parameters .
the results of a statistical fit of particle ratios including @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath5 , @xmath21 , @xmath16 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 are presented on figure [ fig : gammas ] .
very good agreement between our data and the model are achieved for each centrality range at @xmath0 at rhic @xcite .
a fit has been performed first including @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath5 , @xmath21 . for the most central collisions ,
the four free parameters of the fit are @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 and @xmath29 .
the evolution of @xmath1 and @xmath2 with centrality are represented as square symbols on figure [ fig : gammas ] .
an other fit has also been performed including then all the hadrons @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath5 , @xmath21 , @xmath16 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 .
the parameters obtained for the most central collision are @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 and @xmath33 .
@xmath1 and @xmath2 evolutions with centrality are represented as circles .
we note no dependence of @xmath1 with centrality .
all the particles seem to chemically freeze - out at a temperature of 160@xmath345mev close to lqcd predictions , @xmath1 seems to be essentially fixed by the most numerous @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 particles and does not seem to be dependent on the initial system size . from peripheral to central collisions , including ( multi-)strange hadrons in the fit , @xmath2 increases from 0.8 and saturates at 1 .
this value suggests that in most central collisions at top rhic energy , the phase space is saturated in strange quarks so that the system is close to strangeness equilibration .
this increase of @xmath2 also signs the existence of significant @xmath35@xmath36 production processes at a partonic level such as gluon fusions . a hydrodynamically - inspired fit known as `` blastwave fit '' @xcite assuming all particles
are emitted from a thermal expanding source with a transverse flow velocity @xmath37@xmath38@xmath39 at the thermal freeze - out temperature @xmath40 has been performed on @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 spectra together and on @xmath11 and @xmath14 separately .
a velocity profile @xmath41=@xmath42 was used , where @xmath43 is the radius of the source and @xmath44 was determined from the fit to the @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 spectra ranging from @xmath44=0.81 for the most central bin to @xmath44=1.42 for the most peripheral . for ( @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 ) ,
9 bins of centrality indexed from 1 ( most central ) to 9 ( most peripheral ) have been considered while 5 centrality bins for @xmath6 have been studied . for @xmath7 ,
only the most central bin has been investigated .
the results of the fits are presented on figure [ fig : blastwave ] .
9.cm 0.8 the one and two sigma contours are represented for the best fit values ( @xmath40,@xmath37@xmath38@xmath39 ) .
for the most central bin , we note : 1 ) there is no overlap of the contours for ( @xmath3,@xmath4,@xmath5 ) and ( @xmath11 ) suggesting that ( @xmath3,k , p ) take part to the same collective transverse radial flow different from the one developed by the @xmath11 ; 2 ) concerning @xmath11 , they seem to thermally freeze - out at a temperature of @xmath45 , close to the chemical fo temperature previously obtained from statistical fits to particle ratios whereas @xmath40 for ( @xmath3,@xmath4,@xmath5 ) amounts @xmath46 .
it suggests that multi - strange particles should have decoupled earlier in the collision close to chemical fo ; 3 ) furthermore , the fact that they develop an as significant flow as @xmath16 and that their interaction cross - section is presumably very small , suggests that their flow has been developed prior to chemical fo so prior to the hadronization , probably at a partonic stage of the system and not in the hadronic phase as for ( @xmath3,@xmath4,@xmath5 ) .
otherwise , it is corroborated by the fact that the thermal fo parameters of the multi - strange baryons do not depend on the centrality and that @xmath1 is close to @xmath40 . concerning ( @xmath3,@xmath4,@xmath5 ) , results show that @xmath1@xmath39@xmath40 and that the difference between these two temperatures increases with centrality .
it suggests a longer duration time between these two fo for the lightest particles ( @xmath3,@xmath4,@xmath5 ) essentially due to their rescattering in the hadron phase while the system is cooling down .
these results indicate that au+au collisions with different initial conditions evolve always to the same chemical fo temperature , and then cool down further to a kinetic fo dependent on centrality .
so this radial flow scenario suggests that for multi - strange baryons , a significant fraction ( if not all ) of the transverse flow has been developed probably in a partonic phase of the system so that multi - strange baryons should develop elliptic flow .
figure [ fig : v2pt ] shows the measurement of the elliptic flow @xmath47 of @xmath48 and @xmath49 as a function of @xmath8 for the minimum bias data .
@xmath47 of @xmath50 and @xmath51 previously measured @xcite are also represented for comparison . ' '' '' ' '' '' first we observe that @xmath47 of multi - strange baryons is different from zero and seems to follow the same behaviour as @xmath16 @xmath47 .
that means same shape ( saturation at a @xmath52 ) and same amplitude ( saturation at @xmath53 ) . in the low @xmath8 region ,
@xmath11 @xmath47 is in agreement with hydrodynamic model calculations ( colored zone ) which predict its mass ordering in this @xmath8 region .
however , for a @xmath54 , @xmath47 deviates from hydrodynamic model prediction and shows different behaviour for @xmath50 which saturates at a @xmath55 , at a value around @xmath56 compared to the strange baryons @xmath47 .
it confirms a previously established baryon to meson dependence of the elliptic flow parameter from a particle mass dependence in the intermediate @xmath8 region @xcite .
this particle type dependence is well and `` simply '' explained by quark coalescence or recombination models @xcite in which hadrons are dominantly produced by the coalescence of constituent quarks from a partonic system supporting the idea of a collectivity between partons .
these models predict a universal scaling of transverse momentum @xmath8 and elliptic flow to the number of constituent quarks ( @xmath44 ) .
previously , such scaling has been demonstrated for the mesons @xmath57 and the baryons @xmath16 at intermediate @xmath8 @xcite .
figure [ fig : v2nptn ] shows the superposition of the scaled elliptic flows @xmath58 for @xmath57 , @xmath16 as well as for @xmath6 , supporting that the flow of @xmath35 quarks is close to that of @xmath59 and @xmath60 quarks within error bars .
we have presented the evolution of freeze - out parameters with au+au collision centrality .
the increase of the strange quark phase space saturation factor , @xmath2 , up to 1 for the most central collision suggests that strangeness equilibration is achieved at top rhic energy .
@xmath1 , common for all particles , appears to be independent of the system size .
the kinetic fo parameters obtained from blastwave fit to @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 spectra suggest that they are taking part to a same collective flow behaviour with an increasing duration time between chemical and thermal fo with centrality essentially due to hadron rescatterings . for multi - strange baryons
, the collective behaviour seems to be quite different .
since @xmath1 and @xmath40 are close to each other and show no dependence with centrality , it indicates that multi - strange baryons take less part in the evolution dynamics in the hadronic phase and should have decoupled much earlier in the collision than ( @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 ) , carrying with them an important partonic flow contribution .
this idea is emphasized by the measurement of their elliptic flow whose scaling by the constituent quarks in the intermediate @xmath8 region is well described by coalescence and recombination models .
9 z. fodor , nucl .
a715 * , 319c ( 2003 ) and references there in ; z. fodor and s.d .
katz , hep - lat/0402006 .
j. rafelski , j. letessier , nucl . phys .
* a715 * , 98 ( 2003 ) .
p. braun - munzinger , i. heppe and j. stachel , phys .
* b465 * , 15 ( 1999 ) . f. becattini and l. ferroni , hep - ph/0407117 .
p. braun - munzinger , k. redlich and j. stachel , nucl - th/0304013 .
h. van hecke , h. sorge and n. xu , phys .
* 81 * , 5764 ( 1998 ) .
y. cheng _ et al .
c*68 * , 034910 ( 2003 ) .
j. y. ollitrault , phys .
rev . d*46 * , 229 ( 1992 ) .
star collaboration , nucl .
a499 * 659 ( 2003 ) . c. adler _
et al . _ ,
star collaboration , phys .
rev . lett.*89 * , 092301 ( 2002 ) .
e. schnedermann , j. sollfrank and u. heinz , phys . rev . *
c48 * , 2462 ( 1993 ) .
j. adams _ et al .
_ , star collaboration , phys .
lett . * 92 * , 052302 ( 2004 ) .
j. castillo , star collaboration , j. phys .
phys . * 30 * s827 - 34 ( 2004 ) d. molnar and s. voloshin , phys .
91 * , 092301 ( 2003 ) .
fries , b. mueller , c. nonaka , s.a .
bass , phys .
lett . * 90 * , 092303 ( 2003 ) . | lattice quantum chromodynamics predict transition between hadronic gas quark gluon plasma at temperature around 170mev close net - baryon free region deconfined state of quarks gluons expected formed in ultra - relativistic heavy ion collisions study of final hadronic state properties collisions low particle spectra via multi - strange particles may provide information dynamics early stage to chemical thermal freeze - out strange quarks mass comparable to temperature qgp formation produced in high temperature qgp phase parton achieve equilibration hadronization process described by adjusting four parameters chemical temperature baryon strange chemical potential strangeness phase space occupancy factor provides measurement strangeness equilibration evolution measurement strangeness evolution in bulk matter study collective motion collision - shown @xmath3 k p particles same transverse collective flow freeze - out at temperature smaller than @xmath1 suggesting expansion cooling system between chemical thermal fo multi - strange baryons suggested particles develop significant transverse radial flow small cross section decouple earlier in collision transverse radial flow reflects partonic flow behaviourelliptic flow due to initial asymmetry in non - central collisions good tool for understanding early stage collisions multi - strange baryon elliptic flow probe initial partonic system flow additive quantity present radial transverse elliptic flow measurements of multi - strange baryons disentangle hadronic partonic contributions 8 cm 0.8 data collected by star detector @xcite multi - strange particles identified via topology decay @xmath11 subsequent decay branching ratios 100 68 64@xmath18 details see @xcite corrections for tracking efficiency detector acceptance applied final corrected transverse momentum distributions fitted extract yields inverse slope parameters results of statistical fit of particle ratios including presented on figure good agreement between data model for each centrality range at @xmath0 @xcite fit performed first including @xmath19 for most central collisions four free parameters fit are @xmath26 evolution of @xmath1 @xmath2 with centrality represented as square symbols on figureother fit performed including hadrons @xmath19 parameters for central collision are @xmath30 @xmath1 @xmath2 evolutions with centrality represented as circles no dependence of @xmath1 with centrality particles chemically freeze - out at temperature 160 to predictions @xmath1 fixed by numerous @xmath3 particles dependent on initial system size peripheral to central collisions @xmath2 increases from 0.8 saturates at 1 suggests collisions phase space saturated in strange quarks system close to strangeness equilibration increase of @xmath2 signs significant @xmath35@xmath36 production processes at level gluon fusions hydrodynamically - inspired fit blastwave fit '' particles emitted from thermal expanding source transverse flow velocity @xmath37 at thermal freeze - out temperature @xmath40 performed on @xmath3 @xmath5 spectra @xmath11 @xmath14 separatelyvelocity profile @xmath41=@xmath42 used @xmath43 radius source @xmath44 determined from fit @xmath3 spectra from @xmath44=0.81 central to @xmath44=1.42 peripheral for @xmath3 9 bins centrality from 1 central to 9 peripheral considered 5 centrality bins for @xmath6 studied @xmath7 most central bin investigated results fits presented on figure 9.cm 0.8 one two sigma contours represented for best fit values ( @xmath40,@xmath37@xmath38@xmath39 ) central bin no overlap contours for @xmath3,@xmath4@xmath5 @xmath11 ) suggesting transverse radial flow different @xmath11 @xmath11 thermally freeze - out at temperature @xmath45 close to chemical temperature statistical fits particle ratios @xmath40 amounts @xmath46 .suggests multi - strange particles decoupled earlier in collision close to chemical fo develop significant flow as @xmath16 interaction cross - section small suggests flow developed prior to chemical fo hadronization probably partonic stage not hadronic phase @xmath3 thermal fo parameters multi - strange baryons depend on centrality @xmath1 close to @xmath40 @xmath3 results show @xmath1 difference temperatures increases with centrality suggests longer duration time between for lightest particles due to rescattering in hadron phase while system cooling down indicate au+au collisions with different initial conditions evolve to same chemical fo temperature cool down to kinetic fo dependent on centrality radial flow scenario suggests multi - strange baryons significant fraction transverse flow developed in partonic phase develop elliptic flow figure shows measurement elliptic flow @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 function of @xmath8 minimum bias data @xmath47 of @xmath50 @xmath51 measured @xcite represented for comparison @xmath47 different from zero same behaviour as @xmath16 @xmath47same shape saturation @xmath52 amplitude @xmath53 low @xmath8 region @xmath11 @xmath47 hydrodynamic model calculations mass ordering @xmath54 @xmath47 deviates different behaviour @xmath50 saturates @xmath55 around @xmath56 baryons @xmath47 confirms baryon meson dependence elliptic flow parameter particle mass dependence intermediate @xmath8 region particle dependence explained by quark coalescence models hadrons produced coalescence quarks partonic system predict scaling transverse momentum @xmath8 elliptic flow to number constituent quarks @xmath44 scaling demonstrated for mesons @xmath57 baryons @xmath16 intermediate @xmath8 figure superposition scaled elliptic flows @xmath58 @xmath57 @xmath16 @xmath6 flow @xmath35 quarks close to @xmath59 @xmath60 quarks within error bars evolution of freeze - out parameters au+au collision centrality increase strange quark phase space saturation factor @xmath2 up to 1 central collision strangeness equilibration at top rhic energy @xmath1 common particles independent of system sizekinetic parameters from @xmath3 spectra suggest collective flow behaviour increasing duration between chemical thermal fo due to hadron rescatterings multi - strange baryons collective behaviour different @xmath1 @xmath40 close no dependence centrality baryons less in evolution dynamics hadronic phase decoupled earlier collision important partonic flow contribution emphasized by measurement elliptic flow scaling intermediate @xmath8 region described by coalescence recombination models z. fodor nucl a715 * 319c ( 2003 ) katz hep - lat/0402006 j. rafelski letessier . a715 98 ( 2003 ) braun - munzinger heppe j stachel phys b465 15 ( 1999 ) becattini ferroni hep - ph/0407117 braun - munzinger redlich stachel nucl - th/0304013 van hecke sorge n. xu phys . 81 5764 ( 1998 ) cheng c*68 034910 ( 2003 ) ollitrault phys . d*46 229 ( 1992 ) star collaboration nucla499 659 2003 ) adler star collaboration phys .*89 092301 ( 2002 ) schnedermann sollfrank heinz phys rev c48 2462 ( 1993 ) adams star collaboration phys 92 052302 ( 2004 ) castillo star collaboration 30 s827 - 34 ( 2004 ) molnar voloshin 91 092301 ( 2003 ) fries mueller nonaka bass phys . 90 092303 ( 2003 ) | 0.499918 | 3,194 | 1,606 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,182 | we present a feasibility study for a new analysis for extracting the angle @xmath0 of the unitarity triangle from the study of the neutral b meson decays .
we reconstruct the decay channel @xmath1 with the @xmath2 and the @xmath3 using a @xmath4 dalitz analysis technique .
the sensitivity to the angle @xmath0 comes from the interference of the @xmath5 and @xmath6 processes contributing to the same final state and by the fact that the @xmath7 can be unambiguosly identified through the sign of electric charge of the kaon from @xmath8 decay .
the impact of the result of such analysis is evaluated for the actual babar statistics . | various methods related to @xmath9 decays have been proposed to determine the ut angle @xmath0 . within them , the one that gives the best error on @xmath0 is the dalitz method @xcite@xcite .
we propose to measure the angle @xmath0 using a dalitz analysis applied to neutral b mesons . in general , since the neutral b mesons mix , interference effects between @xmath10 and @xmath11 decay amplitudes in @xmath12 decays ( for instance into @xmath13 final states ) are studied for the determination of the combination of ut angles @xmath14 . in this case
the tagging technique and a time dependent analysis are required .
this can be avoided if the final states contain a particle which allows to unambiguously identify if a @xmath12 or @xmath15 has decayed . this is the case of neutral b mesons decaying into @xmath16 $ ] final states , where the flavor of the b meson can be determined through the sign of the electric charge of the kaon .
one of the relevant parameter in those kind of analysis is the ratio between the @xmath11 and @xmath10 amplitudes , which can be expressed by : @xmath17 the sensitivity to @xmath0 is proportional to the @xmath18 value . considering the ckm factors in the @xmath10 and @xmath11 transitions and the fact that in both cases the processes are mediated by a color suppressed diagram , we expect @xmath19 to be in the range [ 0.3 - 0.5 ] , larger than for the equivalent ratio in the charged b sector , which has been found to be of the order 0.1 @xcite .
in the analysis on data we would perform an unbinned maximum likelihood fit in order to extract the interesting quantities : the likelihood will contain a product of a yields pdf and a cp pdf ( only the latter has , within its variables , the weak phase @xmath0 ) . in our feasibility study , we assume the yields pdf to be a function of the classic babar analysis variable @xmath20 , where the asterisk denotes evaluation in the @xmath21 cm frame ] and of a variable that is able to discriminate between @xmath22 and continuum events ( @xmath23 events , with @xmath24 ) .
for the distributions of those variables we make some realistic assumptions inspired by babar analysis . in writing the cp pdf , we have an additional difficulty , with respect to the @xmath25 dalitz analysis .
this is due to the fact that the natural width of the @xmath26 is not small ( @xmath2750 ) and hence the interference with the other @xmath28 processes may not be negligible .
we follow the formalism introduced in @xcite and also used in the @xmath29 babar analysis in order to solve this problem .
we introduce the effective quantities @xmath30 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 defined as : @xmath33 where @xmath34 for the schwartz inequality and @xmath35 $ ] . in the limit of a @xmath362-body decay , such as @xmath37 we have : @xmath38 , @xmath39 ( the phase difference between the @xmath40 and the @xmath41 amplitudes of eq.[eq : rb ] ) and k=1 .
@xmath42 , @xmath43 are real and positive .
the subscript @xmath44 and @xmath45 refer to the @xmath46 and @xmath47 transitions , respectively .
the index @xmath48 indicates the position in the phase space of @xmath49 . applying this formalism
, we write the cp pdf as follows : @xmath50k^-\pi^+(k^+\pi^- ) ) \propto \nonumber \\
\label{eq : dalitzrate1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath51 is the strong phase difference between @xmath52 and @xmath53 and @xmath54 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 are defined in eqs .
( [ eq : rs_square ] ) and ( [ eq : k ] ) .
we have simplified the notation using @xmath55 and @xmath56 .
the dalitz structure of the decay @xmath57 is well known and it has already been used in dalitz analysis in the charged b sector @xcite @xcite .
we performe a study to evaluate the possible variation of @xmath30 and @xmath31 on the b dalitz plot . for this purpose
we use a b dalitz model as suggested by the recent measurements @xcite , @xcite . the model assumed for the decay parametrizes the amplitude @xmath58 at each point @xmath31 of the dalitz plot as a sum of two - body decay matrix elements and a non - resonant term according to the following expression : @xmath59 we consider a region within @xmath60 48 mev from the nominal mass of the @xmath26(892 ) resonance and we obtain the distribution of @xmath30 , @xmath31 and @xmath61 by randomly varying all the strong phases between [ 0 - 2@xmath62 and the amplitudes up to @xmath63 of their nominal value ( shown in table [ tab : b0 ] ) . only for the @xmath64 resonance ,
the variation is up to @xmath65 of its nominal value .
.list of mass ( @xmath66 ) , widths ( @xmath67 ) and quantum numbers of the resonances considered in our model .
the last two columns present the chosen values of the coefficients @xmath68 for the @xmath41 and @xmath40 transitions respectively . note that the phase @xmath69 are not indicated and their choice is arbitrary . [
cols="<,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] we conclude that , with the now available babar statistics , the measurement strategy would be extracting from the fit @xmath0 as a scan with respect to @xmath18 ( i.e. by performing a likelihood scan on @xmath0 for each value of @xmath18 with @xmath0 , @xmath70 and all the yields parameters floated in the fit ) . in this way we would extract from data the maximum possible information for the available statistics : an information on @xmath0 and not on @xmath18 .
the @xmath0 distribution obtained in that way , already very interesting on its own , would be very precious when combined with an experimental input for @xmath18 .
the coverage tests on toy - mc generated with different values of @xmath30 show that we have no bias in this fit configuration .
in this section we show , on one chosen toy - mc , what would be the impact of a real mesurement . in figure
[ fig : gammascan_rbfix_toy ] we show the output of our fit : a likelihood scan of @xmath0 with respect to @xmath30 .
this distribution , when combined with a fake @xmath30 measurement ( @xmath71 ) gives @xmath0 with an error of @xmath72 .
a measurement of @xmath30 with such an error is what we could expect to obtain , if @xmath73 , on @xmath74 data from an analysis of @xmath75 with the @xmath4 in flavor modes .
clearly , this is just a example on a chosen toy - mc and it is not necessarily representative of what we will find on data .
indeed we found , on toy - mc studies , that in a small percentage of cases we can be much less sensitive to @xmath0 .
that problem has been found to depend on the low number of signal events ( such that in some cases those events happen to be in poorly sensitive regions of the @xmath4 dalitz plot ) and it will therefore disappear with the increasing of the statistics . still , our test shows that we could have a result on @xmath0 that is competitive with the charged b dalitz analysis ( the analysis made on babar data gives today an error on @xmath0 of @xmath76 ) .
99 b. aubert _ et al . _ [ babar collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0607104 .
a. poluektov _ et al .
_ [ belle collaboration ] , phys .
d * 73 * , 112009 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ex/0604054 ] .
m. bona _ et al . _ [ utfit collaboration ] , jhep * 0507 * , 028 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0501199 ] .
updated results available at http://www.utfit.org/ m. gronau , _ phys .
lett . _ * b557 * , 198 - 206 ( 2003 ) .
f. polci , m .- h .
schune and a. stocchi [ arxiv : hep - ph/0605129 ] .
g.cavoto et al .
, proceedings of the ckm 2005 workshop ( wg5 ) , uc san diego , 15 - 18 march 2005 , hep - ph/0603019 .
the parameterization given in eq .
( [ eq : dalitzrate1 ] ) can be rewritten in terms of the cartesian coordinates @xmath77 $ ] and @xmath78 $ ] as @xmath79\bar{x_s^0}(x_s^0 ) ) \propto$ ] + @xmath80 + y_{s\mp } im[f_{\mp}f_{\pm}^ * ] \right]$ ] | methods @xmath9 decays proposed determine ut angle @xmath0 best error @xmath0 dalitz method propose measure angle @xmath0 using dalitz analysis neutral b mesons neutral b mesons mix interference effects between @xmath10 @xmath11 decay amplitudes @xmath12 decays studied for ut angles @xmath14 tagging technique time dependent analysis required avoided if final states contain particle @xmath12 or @xmath15 decayed case of neutral b mesons decaying into @xmath16 final states flavor b meson determined through electric charge kaon relevant parameter ratio between @xmath11 @xmath10 amplitudes expressed sensitivity to @xmath0 proportional to @xmath18 value ckm factors in @xmath10 @xmath11 transitions processes mediated by color suppressed diagram expect @xmath19 range [ 0.3 - 0.5 ] larger than equivalent ratio in charged b sector 0.1 @xcite analysis data unbinned maximum likelihood fit extract interesting quantities likelihood product of yields pdf cp pdf latter has weak phase @xmath0feasibility study assume yields pdf function classic babar analysis variable @xmath20 asterisk denotes evaluation @xmath21 cm frame variable @xmath22 continuum events @xmath23 @xmath24 distributions variables realistic assumptions inspired babar analysis writing cp pdf additional difficulty @xmath25 dalitz analysis natural width @xmath26 not small @xmath2750 interference with @xmath28 processes follow formalism @xcite @xmath29 babar analysis solve problem introduce effective quantities @xmath30 @xmath32 defined @xmath33 @xmath34 schwartz inequality @xmath35 $ ] limit @xmath362-body decay @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 phase difference @xmath40 @xmath41 amplitudes eq. k=1 @xmath42 @xmath43 real positive subscript @xmath44 @xmath45 refer @xmath46 @xmath47 transitions index @xmath48 indicates position phase space @xmath49formalism write cp pdf @xmath50k^-\pi+{eq : dalitzrate1{aligned @xmath51 strong phase difference between @xmath52 defined in eqs eq rs_square k simplified notation @xmath55 @xmath56 dalitz structure decay @xmath57 known used dalitz analysis charged b sector study evaluate variation @xmath30 @xmath31 on b dalitz plot use b dalitz model recent measurements model parametrizes amplitude @xmath58 each point @xmath31 dalitz plot sum of two - body decay matrix elements non - resonant term @xmath59 region within @xmath60 48 mev from nominal mass @xmath26(892 ) resonance obtain distribution of @xmath30 randomly varying strong phases between 0 - 2@xmath62 amplitudes up to @xmath63 nominal value table b0 @xmath64 resonance variation up to @xmath65 nominal value mass @xmath66 widths @xmath67 ) quantum numbers resonances considered model last two columns present chosen values coefficients @xmath68 for @xmath41 @xmath40 transitionsphase @xmath69 not indicated choice arbitrary cols="^",options="header with babar statistics measurement strategy extracting from fit @xmath0 scan with respect to @xmath18 performing likelihood scan on @xmath0 for each value @xmath18 with @xmath0 @xmath70 yields parameters extract data maximum information for statistics information on @xmath0 not @xmath18 @xmath0 distribution interesting precious combined with experimental input for @xmath18 coverage tests on toy - mc with different values @xmath30 show no bias in fit configuration show one toy - mc impact of real mesurement figure gammascan_rbfix_toy output fit likelihood scan of @xmath0 @xmath30 distribution combined with fake @xmath30 measurement @xmath71 ) gives @xmath0 error of @xmath72 measurement of @xmath30 with error @xmath74 data from analysis of @xmath75 with @xmath4 in flavor modes example on chosen toy - mc not representative of data studies small percentage of cases less sensitive to @xmath0problem low signal events poorly sensitive regions @xmath4 dalitz plot disappear with increasing statistics test shows result @xmath0 competitive with charged b dalitz analysis analysis babar data error on @xmath0 @xmath76 aubert babar collaboration arxiv hep - ex/0607104 poluektov belle collaboration . d * 73 *, 112009 ( 2006 ) arxiv hep - ex/0604054 bona utfit collaboration jhep * 0507 *, 028 ( 2005 ) hep - ph/0501199 updated results http://www.utfit/. gronau phys . lett. b557 *, 198 - 206 ( 2003 ) f. polci schune. stocchi arxiv hep - ph/0605129 ] g.cavoto proceedings ckm 2005 workshop uc san diego 15 - 18 march 2005 hep - ph/0603019 parameterization eq . dalitzrate1 rewritten cartesian coordinates @xmath77 @xmath78 as @xmath79{x_s^0 + @xmath80 + y_ | 0.31439 | 2,109 | 1,124 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,197 | we propose a fast algorithm for computing the economic capital , value at risk and greeks in the gaussian factor model .
the algorithm proposed here is much faster than brute force monte carlo simulations or fourier transform based methods @xcite .
while the algorithm of hull - white @xcite is comparably fast , it assumes that all the loans in the portfolio have equal notionals and recovery rates .
this is a very restrictive assumption which is unrealistic for many portfolios encountered in practice .
our algorithm makes no assumptions about the homogeneity of the portfolio .
additionally , it is easier to implement than the algorithm of hull - white .
we use the implicit function theorem to derive analytic expressions for the greeks . | let us consider a portfolio of @xmath0 loans .
let the notional of loan @xmath1 be equal to @xmath2 .
then the @xmath1th loan represents fraction @xmath3 of the notional of the whole portfolio .
this means that if loan @xmath1 defaults and the entire notional of the loan is lost the portfolio loses fraction @xmath4 or @xmath5 of its value . in practice
when a loan @xmath1 defaults a fraction @xmath6 of its notional will be recovered by the creditors . thus the actual loss given default ( lgd ) of loan @xmath1 is @xmath7 fraction or @xmath8 of the notional of the entire portfolio .
we now describe the gaussian m - factor model of portfolio losses from default .
the model requires a number of input parameters . for each loan
@xmath1 we are give a probability @xmath9 of its default .
also for each @xmath1 and each @xmath10 we are given a number @xmath11 such that @xmath12 .
the number @xmath11 is the loading factor of the loan @xmath1 with respect to factor @xmath13 .
let @xmath14 and @xmath15 be independent standard normal random variables .
let @xmath16 be the cdf of the standard normal distribution . in our model loan @xmath1 defaults if @xmath17 this indeed happens with probability @xmath9 .
the factors @xmath18 are usually interpreted as the state of the global economy , the state of the regional economy , the state of a particular industry and so on .
thus they are the factors that affect the default behavior of all or at least a large group of loans in the portfolio .
the factors @xmath19 are interpreted as the idiosyncratic risks of the loans in the portfolio .
let @xmath20 be defined by @xmath21 we define the random loss caused by the default of loan @xmath1 as @xmath22 where @xmath6 is the recovery rate of loan @xmath1 .
the total loss of the portfolio is @xmath23 an important property of the gaussian factor model is that the @xmath24 s are not independent of each other .
their mutual dependence is induced by the dependence of each @xmath24 on the common factors @xmath18 .
historical data supports the conclusion that losses due to defaults on different loans are correlated with each other .
historical data can also be used to calibrate the loadings @xmath11.the @xmath24 s are not independent of each other .
their mutual dependence is induced by the dependence of each @xmath24 on the common factors @xmath18 .
historical data supports the conclusion that losses due to defaults on different loans are correlated with each other .
historical data can also be used to calibrate the loadings @xmath11 .
when the values of the factors @xmath18 are fixed , the probability of the default of loan @xmath1 becomes @xmath26 the random losses @xmath24 become conditionally independent bernoulli variables with the mean given by @xmath27 and the variance given by @xmath28 by the central limit theorem @xcite the conditional distribution of the portfolio loss @xmath25 , given the values of the factors @xmath18 , can be approximated by the normal distribution with the mean @xmath29 and the variance @xmath30 we define the cdf of the unconditional portfolio loss @xmath25 by @xmath31 for all real numbers @xmath32 .
since the conditional loss distribution is approximately normal , the cdf can be approximated by @xmath33 where @xmath34 is the cdf of the normal distribution with mean @xmath35 and variance @xmath36 , while @xmath37 is the density of the standard normal distribution .
in this section we apply the proposed algorithm to the single factor gaussian model of a portfolio with @xmath38 names . we choose a 125 name portfolio because it is the size of the standard djcdx.na.ig portfolio .
we choose a single factor model because it is the one most frequently used in practice .
the parameters of the portfolio are @xmath39 where @xmath40 . in figure [ resultsfig ]
we compare the cdf computed using @xmath41 monte carlo samples with the cdf computed using formula ( [ theformula ] ) .
the agreement between the two is good .
we add that the quality of approximation will improve even further for a bigger portfolio and many bank portfolios have much more than 125 names .
[ resultsfig ]
we define the @xmath42 ( value at risk ) of a given portfolio as the level of loss ( expressed as fraction of portfolio notional ) , such that the probability of the portfolio loss being less or equal to @xmath42 is equal to a predefined confidence level @xmath43 .
typically , @xmath43 is chosen to be between @xmath44 and @xmath45 .
thus we have @xmath46 from the results of the previous section it follows that an accurate approximation to @xmath42 can be found by solving the equation @xmath47 this equation can be solved , for example , by bisection . to find the solution to ( [ equv ] ) with accuracy of 1 basis point ( 0.01% ) we would need to evaluate the left hand side of ( [ equv ] ) no more than 14 times .
* example . *
_ we want to calculate the @xmath42 of the portfolio ( [ port ] ) with the confidence level @xmath48 .
we solve the equation ( [ equv ] ) and round the solution to the nearest basis point to arrive at @xmath49 .
we now run monte carlo simulation with @xmath50 samples and compute the probability that the portfolio loss is less or equal to @xmath51 . rounded to the nearest basis point it turns out to be @xmath52 .
thus the @xmath42 of the portfolio is indeed @xmath51 .
_ if desired , the convergence can be sped - up by using newton s method .
after the @xmath42 is calculated we can calculate the economic capital by subtracting the average portfolio loss from @xmath42 .
we now compare the algorithm proposed here with other proposed alternatives .
the fft based methods @xcite require the computation of a large number of fourier transforms . to determine the @xmath42 with an error of less than 1 basis point ( 0.01% ) it is necessary to compute approximately 10,000 fourier transforms .
each fourier transform is as expensive to evaluate as the left hand side of ( [ equv ] ) .
thus our algorithm is significantly faster than the fft based methods .
it is well known that the fft methods are much faster than the direct monte carlo simulation .
thus our algorithm is much faster than the monte carlo approach .
finally , the recursive approach of hull - white @xcite is comparable in speed to the algorithm proposed here .
however , it assumes that all the loans in the portfolio have equal notionals and recovery rates .
this is a very restrictive assumption which is unrealistic for many portfolios encountered in practice .
our algorithm makes no assumptions about homogeneity of the portfolio .
additionally , it is easier to implement than the algorithm of hull - white .
since @xmath42 satisfies equation ( [ equv ] ) we can use the implicit function theorem @xcite to find its partial derivatives with respect to the parameters of the model .
these partial derivatives are traditionally called the greeks in finance .
we arrive at the following expressions @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 and @xmath57 these expressions can be easily evaluated by numerical integration using hermite - gauss quadrature .
we proposed an algorithm for computing the @xmath42 and the economic capital of a loan portfolio in the gaussian factor model .
the proposed method was tested on a portfolio of 125 names and gave high accuracy results
. the accuracy will be even higher for portfolios with more names .
many of the bank portfolios are much larger than 125 names .
the proposed algorithm is much faster than the fft based methods @xcite and the brute force monte carlo approach .
the speed of the hull - white algorithm @xcite is comparable to that of the the algorithm proposed here , but the hull - white algorithm requires that all the loans in the portfolio have equal notionals and recovery rates .
this is a very restrictive assumption which is unrealistic for many portfolios encountered in practice .
our algorithm makes no assumptions about the homogeneity of the portfolio .
also , it is easier to implement than the algorithm of hull - white . additionally , we obtained analytical expressions for the greeks using the implicit function theorem .
we also comment that the algorithm can be extended trivially to the case of stochastic recovery rates and recovery rates correlated with the state of the factor variables .
some of the ideas used in this paper were previously explored in @xcite and @xcite .
i thank my adviser a. chorin for his help and guidance during my time in uc berkeley .
i thank mathilda regan and valerie heatlie for their help in preparing this article .
last , but not least , i thank my family for their constant support .
p. okunev .
using hermite expansions for fast and arbitrarily accurate computation of the expected loss of a loan portfolio tranche in the gaussian factor model .
report - lbnl-57835 , lawrence berkeley national laboratory , berkeley , ca , 2005 . | consider portfolio of @xmath0 loans notional loan @xmath1 equal to @xmath2 @xmath1th loan represents fraction @xmath3 of notional portfolio if loan @xmath1 defaults notional lost portfolio loses fraction @xmath4 or value loan @xmath1 defaults fraction @xmath6 notional recovered by creditors actual loss default loan @xmath1 is @xmath7 fraction of notional entire portfolio gaussian m - factor model of portfolio losses from default requires input parameters each loan @xmath1 probability @xmath9 of default each number @xmath11 loading factor of loan @xmath1 factor @xmath13 @xmath14 and @xmath15 independent standard normal random variables @xmath16 cdf of standard normal distribution loan @xmath1 defaults if @xmath17 probability @xmath9 factors @xmath18 global economy regional economy industry affect default behavior of loans portfolio factors @xmath19 idiosyncratic risks of loans @xmath20 defined by @xmath21 random loss default loan @xmath1 as @xmath22 @xmath6 recovery rate of loan @xmath1total loss portfolio @xmath23 gaussian factor model @xmath24 s not independent mutual dependence induced by each @xmath24 common factors @xmath18 historical data losses due defaults loans correlated historical data calibrate loadings @xmath24 not independent mutual dependence induced by each factors data losses due defaults loans loadings values factors @xmath18 fixed probability default loan @xmath1 becomes @xmath26 random losses @xmath24 become conditionally independent variables with mean @xmath27 variance @xmath28 central limit theorem conditional distribution portfolio loss @xmath25 values factors @xmath18 approximated by normal distribution mean @xmath29 variance @xmath30 define cdf unconditional portfolio loss @xmath25 by @xmath31 real numbers @xmath32 conditional loss distribution normal cdf approximated by @xmath33 @xmath34 cdf normal distribution with mean @xmath35 variance @xmath36 @xmath37 density standard normal distribution apply proposed algorithm single factor gaussian model portfolio with @xmath38 names 125 name portfolio size standard portfolio single factor model most frequently used practice parameters portfolio are @xmath39 @xmath40figure compare cdf computed using @xmath41 monte carlo samples with cdf formula agreement good quality of approximation for bigger portfolio bank portfolios more than 125 names define @xmath42 value at risk ) of portfolio as level of loss fraction of portfolio notional ) probability of portfolio loss less or equal to @xmath42 equal to confidence level @xmath43 @xmath43 between @xmath44 and @xmath45 @xmath46 from results accurate approximation to @xmath42 solving equation @xmath47 solution accuracy 1 basis point 0.01% evaluate left hand side of equv ] ) 14 times calculate @xmath42 portfolio with confidence level @xmath48 solve equation round solution to nearest basis point arrive at @xmath49 run monte carlo simulation with @xmath50 samples compute probability portfolio loss less or equal to @xmath51 nearest basis point @xmath52 @xmath42 of portfolio is indeed @xmath51 convergence sped - up newton s method after @xmath42 calculated calculate economic capital by subtracting average portfolio loss from @xmath42 compare algorithm with other alternativesfft methods require large fourier transforms to determine @xmath42 error less than 1 basis point ( 0.01% 10,000 fourier transforms each transform expensive as left side our algorithm faster than fft methods fft methods faster than direct monte carlo simulation our recursive approach of hull - white @xcite comparable to algorithm assumes loans equal notionals recovery rates restrictive assumption unrealistic for many portfolios our algorithm makes no assumptions easier to implement than hull - white @xmath42 satisfies equation ( use implicit function theorem @xcite to find partial derivatives model called greeks in finance arrive at expressions @xmath53 @xmath57 evaluated by numerical integration using hermite - gauss quadrature proposed algorithm for computing @xmath42 economic capital of loan portfolio in gaussian factor model method tested on portfolio of 125 names high accuracy results accuracy higher for portfolios with more names bank portfolios larger than 125 proposed algorithm faster than fft based methods @xcite brute force monte carlo approachspeed hull - white algorithm @xcite comparable to algorithm proposed here requires loans equal notionals recovery rates restrictive assumption unrealistic for many portfolios our algorithm makes no assumptions about homogeneity portfolio easier to implement than hull - white obtained analytical expressions for greeks using implicit function theorem algorithm can be extended to stochastic recovery rates correlated with state factor variables ideas paper explored in @xcite @xcite thank adviser a. chorin mathilda regan valerie heatlie family for support p. okunev using hermite expansions for fast accurate computation of expected loss loan portfolio tranche in gaussian factor model report - lbnl-57835 lawrence berkeley national laboratory berkeley ca 2005 | 0.317247 | 2,066 | 1,050 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,198 | a preliminary study of double tag events using the l3 detector at center of mass energy @xmath0 has been performed .
the cross - section of @xmath1 collisions is measured at average @xmath2 .
the results are in agreement with predictions based on perturbative qcd , while the quark parton model alone is insufficient to describe the data .
the measurements lie below the lo and above the nlo bfkl calculations . | in this paper we present an update of the analysis of double - tag two - photon events : @xmath3 already published for @xmath4 and @xmath5 @xcite , obtained at lep with the l3 detector .
the data , collected at centre - of - mass energy @xmath6 , correspond to an integrated luminosity of 176 pb@xmath7 .
both scattered electrons are detected in the small angle electromagnetic calorimeters ( fig .
[ fig : kin ] ) .
the virtuality of the two photons , @xmath8 and @xmath9 , is in the range of @xmath10 .
the centre - of - mass energy of the two virtual photons , @xmath11 , ranges from @xmath12 to @xmath13 . _ ] for @xmath14 ( untagged events ) @xcite , the two - photon cross - section , @xmath15 , is dominated by vector - vector interactions , vdm ( fig .
[ fig : feyn]a ) . interactions .
[ fig : feyn ] _ ] with increasing @xmath16 , the vdm process is suppressed by the vector meson form factor and the quark parton model process ( qpm ) , shown in fig .
[ fig : feyn]b , becomes important .
single - tag two - photon events , where @xmath17 , are usually analysed within the dis formalism @xcite and a photon structure function is introduced ( _ resolved photon _ ) . since the highly virtual photon , unlike the proton , does not contain constituent quarks with an unknown density distribution , one may hope to have a complete qcd calculation under particular kinematical conditions . in this formalism , used today by the monte carlo generators , one considers one or two resolved photons ( _ single or double resolved processes _ ) to calculate the qcd leading order diagrams .
an alternative qcd approach is based on the bfkl equation @xcite . here the highly virtual two - photon process , with @xmath18 , is considered as the `` golden '' process where the calculation can be verified without phenomenological inputs @xcite .
the @xmath19 interaction can be seen as the interaction of two @xmath20 pairs scattering off each other via multiple gluon exchange ( fig .
2c ) . for @xmath21
a diagram with one - gluon exchange could be sufficient and the cross - section would be constant ( fig .
2d ) . in the limit of high energy , @xmath22 , the diagram of fig .
2c is calculable by the resummation of the large logarithms . in this scheme
the cross - section for the collision of two virtual photons is @xcite : @xmath23 here @xmath24 where @xmath25 is the beam energy , @xmath26 and @xmath27 are the energy and polar angle of the scattered electrons and @xmath28 is the `` hard pomeron '' intercept . the centre - of - mass energy of the two - photon system is related to the @xmath29 centre - of - mass energy @xmath30 by @xmath31 . in leading order
one has @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the number of colours . using @xmath34 and @xmath35 ,
one obtains @xmath36 @xcite ; in the next - to - leading order the bfkl contribution is calculated to be smaller , @xmath37 @xcite .
double - tag interactions have been measured in previous experiments @xcite at lower values of @xmath16 and @xmath38 . for comparison with the prediction of the bfkl models
, the cross - sections will be given as a function of the variable @xmath39 instead of @xmath38 as used in ref .
the advantage in using this variable is that @xmath40 is independent of the beam energy : @xmath41 with @xmath42 . + as @xmath43 and @xmath44 : + @xmath45 where @xmath46 is the angle between the two photons and @xmath47 are the tagging angles .
the monte carlo generators used in this analysis are jamvg @xcite which generates events with the matrix element of figure [ fig : feyn]b and phojet @xcite which gives a good description of the single - tag events @xcite and uses the grv - lo @xcite parton density in the photon to initiate qcd processes .
the dominant backgrounds are @xmath48 , simulated by jamvg @xcite , and single - tag two - photon hadronic events , where a hadron is misidentified as a scattered electron .
the contamination by annihilation processes is simulated by pythia @xcite ( @xmath49 ) , koralz @xcite ( @xmath50 ) and koralw @xcite ( @xmath51 ) .
all monte carlo events are passed through a full detector simulation using the geant @xcite and the geisha @xcite programs and are reconstructed in the same way as the data .
a detailed description of the l3 detector is given in ref .
the two - photon hadronic events are mainly triggered by two independent triggers : the central track @xcite and the single and double tag energy @xcite triggers .
the total trigger inefficiency of the selected events is less than 1% . and energy of the scattered electrons .
the data is compared to the monte carlo predictions , normalised to the number of data events there are two entries per event .
[ fig : q2 ] _ , title="fig : " ] and energy of the scattered electrons .
the data is compared to the monte carlo predictions , normalised to the number of data events there are two entries per event .
[ fig : q2 ] _ , title="fig : " ] two - photon hadronic event candidates , @xmath3 , are selected using the following cuts : * there must be two identified electrons , forward and backward ( double - tag ) , in the small angle electromagnetic calorimeters .
each electron is identified as the highest energy cluster in one of the calorimeters , with energy greater than @xmath52 .
the polar angle of the two tagged electrons has to be in the range @xmath53 mrad and @xmath54 mrad .
* the number of tracks , measured in the polar angle region @xmath55 , must be greater than two .
the tracks are required to have a transverse momentum , @xmath56 , greater than @xmath57 and a distance of closest approach in the transverse plane to the interaction vertex smaller than 10 mm . *
the value of @xmath39 is required to be in the range @xmath58 .
after these cuts , 108 events are selected with an estimated background of 14 events from @xmath48 and misidentified single - tag events .
the contamination from annihilation processes is negligible . , and the variable @xmath40 .
the data are compared to the monte carlo predictions , normalised to the number of data events .
[ fig : wtru ] _ , title="fig : " ] , and the variable @xmath40 .
the data are compared to the monte carlo predictions , normalised to the number of data events .
[ fig : wtru ] _ , title="fig : " ] [ cols="^,^,^,^,^ " , ] in fig .
[ fig : ggcro ] we show @xmath59 , after subtraction of the qpm contribution given in table [ tab : ggcro ] , as a function of @xmath40 . using an average value of @xmath16 , @xmath60 , we calculate the one - gluon exchange contribution with the asymptotic formula ( eq . 10.2 of ref .
the expectations are below the data .
the leading order expectations of the bfkl model ( eq . 4.19 of ref .
@xcite ) , shown as a dotted line in fig .
[ fig : ggcro ] , are too high . by leaving @xmath28 as a free parameter , a fit to the data , taking into account the statistical errors , yields : @xmath61 the results
are shown in fig .
[ fig : ggcro ] as a continuous line . in the same figure
are also shown our previous results @xcite obtained at @xmath62 and @xmath5
. a combined fit of the three sets of data leaving @xmath28 as a free parameter gives : @xmath63 with @xmath64 .
, after subtraction of the qpm contribution at @xmath4 ( @xmath65 ) , @xmath5 ( @xmath66)and @xmath6 ( @xmath60 ) .
the data are compared to the predictions of the lo bfkl calculation and of the one - gluon exchange diagram .
the continuous line is a fit to the data with eq . 1 by leaving @xmath28 as a free parameter .
[ fig : ggcro ] _ ] but if one fixes @xmath28 to its lo and nlo calculated values , one finds respectively : @xmath67 @xmath68
the cross - sections of double - tag @xmath3 events is measured at @xmath6 .
the events are well descibed by the phojet monte carlo model which uses the grv - lo parton density in the photon and leading order perturbative qcd .
a combined fit of our results obtained at @xmath69 gives a value of @xmath70 smaller than expected from the lo bfkl calculations and higher than the value predicted by nlo bfkl calculations .
i would really like to thank maneesh wadhwa for providing me the results and some help , and all the l3 @xmath71 group for discussions and support .
+ thanks also to the organizers of this interesting conference .
twogam version 1.71 is used .
+ l. l@xmath73nnblad , `` @xmath74 event generators '' , in physics at lep2 , ed .
g. altarelli , t. sj@xmath73strand and f. zwirner , cern 96 - 01 ( 1996 ) , volume 2 , 224 .
+ s. nova , delphi note 90 - 35 ( 1990 ) .
+ we thank our colleagues from delphi to make their program available to us | paper update analysis double - tag two - photon events @xmath3 published @xmath4 @xmath5 @xcite obtained lep l3 detector data collected centre - of - mass energy @xmath6 correspond integrated luminosity 176 pb@xmath7 scattered electrons detected small angle electromagnetic calorimeters virtuality two photons @xmath8 @xmath9 range @xmath10 centre - of - mass energy two virtual photons @xmath11 ranges @xmath12 to @xmath13 @xmath14 untagged events @xcite two - photon cross - section @xmath15 dominated vector - vector interactions increasing @xmath16 vdm process suppressed vector meson form factor quark parton model process important single - tag two - photon events @xmath17 analysed dis formalism @xcite photon structure function introduced virtual photon proton contain constituent quarks unknown density distribution complete qcd calculation under kinematical conditions formalism used considers one or two resolved photons calculate qcd leading order diagrams alternative qcd approach bfkl equation @xcitevirtual two - photon process @xmath18 golden '' process calculation without inputs @xmath19 interaction two @xmath20 pairs scattering multiple gluon exchange fig . 2c ) @xmath21 one - gluon exchange cross - section constant fig . 2d ) high energy @xmath22 diagram 2c calculable by resummation large logarithms cross - section for collision two virtual photons @xcite : @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 beam energy @xmath26 @xmath27 energy polar angle of scattered electrons @xmath28 hard pomeron intercept centre - of - mass energy photon related to @xmath29 energy @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 number of colours @xmath34 @xmath35 obtains @xmath36 @xcite bfkl contribution smaller @xmath37 @xcite double - tag interactions measured at lower values of @xmath16 @xmath38 cross - sections function of variable @xmath39 @xmath38 @xmath40 independent of beam energy @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 angle between two photons @xmath47 tagging anglesmonte carlo generators are jamvg @xcite events matrix element figure phojet @xcite single - tag events uses grv - lo @xcite parton density qcd processes dominant backgrounds are @xmath48 simulated by jamvg @xcite single - tag two - photon hadronic events hadron misidentified as scattered electron contamination by annihilation processes simulated by pythia @xcite @xmath49 koralz @xcite koralw @xcite @xmath51 ) monte carlo events passed through full detector simulation using geant @xcite geisha @xcite programs reconstructed as data detailed description of l3 detector in ref two - photon hadronic events triggered by two central track @xcite single and double tag energy @xcite triggers total trigger inefficiency less than 1% energy scattered electrons data compared to monte carlo predictions two entries per event q2 two - photon hadronic event candidates @xmath3 selected using two identified electrons forward and backward double - in small angle electromagnetic calorimeterseach electron identified as highest energy cluster in calorimeters energy greater than @xmath52 polar angle of two tagged electrons in range @xmath53 mrad and @xmath54 mrad number of tracks in polar angle region @xmath55 must greater than two tracks required have transverse momentum , @xmath56 greater than @xmath57 distance of closest approach transverse plane to interaction vertex smaller than 10 mm value of @xmath39 in range @xmath58 . after cuts 108 events selected background of 14 events from @xmath48 misidentified single - tag events contamination from annihilation processes negligible variable @xmath40 data compared to monte carlo predictions normalised to number of data events data predictions @xmath59 after subtraction of qpm contribution function of @xmath40 using average value of @xmath16 , @xmath60 calculate one - gluon exchange contribution with asymptotic formula expectations below data leading order expectations of bfkl model 4.19 too highleaving @xmath28 free parameter fit data errors yields @xmath61 results shown in fig . continuous line previous results at @xmath62 @xmath5 combined fit three sets data @xmath28 free gives @xmath63 with @xmath64 subtraction qpm contribution at @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 data compared to predictions lo bfkl calculation one - gluon exchange diagram continuous line fit data eq . 1 leaving @xmath28 free parameter fixes @xmath28 to lo nlo values finds @xmath67 @xmath68 cross - sections of double - tag @xmath3 events measured at @xmath6 events descibed by phojet monte carlo model grv - lo parton density photon perturbative qcd combined fit results @xmath69 gives value @xmath70 smaller than expected lo bfkl calculations higher than predicted nlo bfkl calculations maneesh wadhwa results l3 @xmath71 group discussions support thanks organizers conference twogam version 1.71 used@xmath73nnblad @xmath74 event generators lep2 altarelli@xmath73strandzwirner cern 96 - 01 1996 volume 2 224 nova delphi note 90 - 35 1990 colleagues delphi program | 0.354781 | 2,299 | 1,171 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,199 | using exact diagonalization we examine the response of several most prominent fractional quantum hall states to a single local impurity .
the @xmath0 singlet state is found to be more inert than the polarized one in spite of its smaller incompressibility gap . based on its spin - spin correlation functions
we interpret it as a liquid of electron pairs with opposite spin .
a comparison of different types of impurities , non magnetic and magnetic , is presented .
the effect of impurities on the incompressible ground states was in the focus of many theoretical studies since the early days of the fractional quantum hall effect ( fqhe ) .
the principal interest is based on the knowledge that the fqhe occurs only in high mobility samples implying that random electric potential ubiquitous in experiments leads to a decrease of the incompressibility gap eventually destroying the incompressibility completely .
a large part of the theoretical work therefore deals with random ensembles of impurities@xcite and this , due to the complexity of such calculations , in context of the most robust incompressible fqh state , bearing the name of r. laughlin , which occurs at filling factor@xcite @xmath1 .
a single impurity can , however , be also viewed as a probe into the correlated state revealing additional information on its properties and nature@xcite . beyond this , as we believe fundamental interest , this information may help to understand new correlated states for which only numerical many - body wavefunctions are available .
the particular example we bear in mind are the half - polarized states at @xmath2 and @xmath3 discovered first in optical experiments@xcite .
numerically , the wavefunctions of suitable candidates can be obtained by exact diagonalization but it was not possible to link them conclusively with any of the physical states proposed subsequently@xcite@xcite .
the current study of the parent polarized and unpolarized states may provide a guideline to achieve this . first , the laughlin wavefunction is investigated and different regimes regarding tis response to a point impurity are identified . here
, we build on the seminal articles of zhang@xcite and rezayi@xcite . a comparison between point and @xmath4-line impurities ,
is presented .
proceeding to filling factors @xmath5 and @xmath3 , it proves advantageous to apply different types of impurities , magnetic and non - magnetic .
this investigation reveals basic structural properties of the various fqh states like local density and polarization responses to impurities .
based on these , we propose that the @xmath2 singlet state is a @xmath6 liquid of electron pairs with opposite spin .
we recall that the three filling factors studied here , @xmath7 , @xmath5 and @xmath3 are all closely related . in the composite fermion ( cf )
picture@xcite , they correspond to filling factors @xmath8 equal to 1 , 2 and 2 respectively and the last two differ only in the direction of the effective field .
systems at @xmath2 and @xmath3 can therefore be expected to behave very similarly , at least within the mean field of the cf . on the other hand , with the spin degree of freedom frozen out ( e.g. by large zeeman energy ) ,
the ground states at @xmath1 and @xmath5 are identical up to a particle - hole conjugation@xcite .
here we show how far these statements of close relationship apply when the excitations become involved in addition to the ground states as it is the case with inhomogeneous systems . | it is a common notion that the laughlin state is incompressible .
this statement however relates to a thermodynamical property and does not contradict the fact that even an arbitrarily small impurity potential locally changes the electron density , fig .
[ fig-14 ] . as a function of the impurity strength @xmath9 , the local density at the position of the impurity @xmath10 shows three distinct types of behaviour marked by i ,
ii and iii in fig .
[ fig-21 ] .
the boundary between i and ii can roughly be identified with the incompressibility gap @xmath11 . while the density change @xmath12 is roughly proportional to @xmath9 for @xmath13 ( region ii ) , reminiscent of a standard compressible behaviour as of a fermi gas or liquid ,
the density change is proportional to @xmath14 for weak impurities ( region i ) .
the latter non - linear region does not appear in earlier data@xcite on a sphere and we attribute it to the center - of - mass part of the wavefunction as we explain below .
finally , the response diverts again from the linear regime for very strong impurities ( region iii ) .
we will not investigate this regime here and focus only on the regions of @xmath15 and @xmath16 .
[ cols="^,^ " , ]
we find that the polarized @xmath1 , @xmath5 and @xmath3 states all respond similarly to isolated impurities , represented in this paper by a weak @xmath4-line impurity . since @xmath3 gives slightly different results than the other two systems we conclude that the particle - hole conjugation ( @xmath7 and @xmath5 ) is a stronger link than the reversal of the effective field in the composite fermion picture ( @xmath5 and @xmath3 ) .
the singlet states react differently : both @xmath5 and @xmath3 respond quite unequally and more weakly to an electric potential impurity than @xmath7 .
in particular , @xmath5 gives a much weaker response than @xmath7 .
this was unexpected because the laughlin state has the largest incompressibility gap .
the spin - resolved _ and _ spin - unresolved density - density correlation functions of the @xmath5 singlet state suggest that electrons in it appear in zero - spin pairs with characteristic size of @xmath17 magnetic lengths and these form a full - landau - level - like state .
high polarizability by magnetic impurities and a relatively small effect of impurities affecting only one spin species are compatible with this interpretation .
the authors acknowledge support from the following grants : av0z10100521 of the academy of sciences of the czech republic ( kv ) , lc510 of the ministry of education of the czech republic ( kv ) , and sfb 508 quantenmaterialien . | common notion laughlin state incompressible relates thermodynamical property contradict small impurity potential changes electron density function impurity strength @xmath9 local density at position impurity @xmath10 shows three types behaviour i ii iii fig boundary between i ii identified with incompressibility gap @xmath11 density change @xmath12 proportional to @xmath9 for @xmath13 region ii density proportional to @xmath14 for weak impurities region i ) latter non - linear region appear in earlier data center - of - mass part wavefunction response diverts from linear regime for strong impurities region iii ) focus on regions @xmath15 @xmath16 polarized @xmath1 @xmath5 @xmath3 states respond similarly to isolated impurities represented by weak @xmath4-line impurity @xmath3 results particle - hole conjugation @xmath7 and @xmath5 stronger than reversal effective field composite fermion picture @xmath5 @xmath3 singlet states react differently @xmath5 @xmath3 respond unequally more weakly to electric potential impurity than@xmath5 weaker response than @xmath7 unexpected laughlin state largest incompressibility gap spin - resolved unresolved density correlation functions @xmath5 singlet state suggest electrons zero - spin pairs @xmath17 magnetic lengths full - landau - level state high polarizability magnetic impurities small effect affecting one spin species compatible interpretation authors acknowledge support grants av0z10100521 academy sciences czech lc510 ministry education sfb 508 quantenmaterialien | 0.136457 | 615 | 323 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
199,206 | we show that a linear decomposition attack based on the decomposition method introduced by the first author in monography @xcite and papers @xcite , @xcite , and developed in @xcite , works by finding the exchanging key in the protocol in @xcite . | in this note we apply a practical deterministic attack on the protocol proposed in @xcite .
this kind of attack introduced by the first author in @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and developed in @xcite works when the platform objects are linear .
it turns out that in this case , contrary to the common opinion ( and some explicitly stated security assumptions ) , one does not need to solve the underlying algorithmic problems to break the scheme , i.e. , there is another algorithm that recovers the private keys without solving the principal algorithmic problem on which the security assumptions are based .
the efficacy of the attack depends on the platform group , so it requires a specific analysis in each particular case . in general
one can only state that the attack is in polynomial time in the size of the data , when the platform and related groups are given together with their linear representations .
in many other cases we can effectively use known linear presentations of the groups under consideration .
a theoretical base for the decomposition method is described in @xcite where a series of examples is presented .
the monography @xcite solves uniformly many protocols based on the conjugacy search problem , protocols based on the decomposition and factorization problems , protocols based on actions by automorphisms , and a number of other protocols .
see also @xcite and @xcite where the linear decomposition attack is applied to the main protocols in @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite . in a series of works @xcite , @xcite and @xcite
( see also @xcite ) tsaban presented another general approach for provable polynomial time solutions of computational problems in groups with efficient , faithful representation as matrix groups . all along the paper
we denote by @xmath0 the set of all nonnegative integers , and by @xmath1 the set of all complex numbers .
in this section , we describe the andrecut s key exchange protocol proposed in @xcite .
firstly we introduce a necessary terminology . then we will give a cryptanalysis of this protocol .
let @xmath2 be a complex matrix of size @xmath3 , that is considered as a variable .
let @xmath4 be two complex polynomials in @xmath5 uniquely defined by the complex vectors of coefficients @xmath6 and @xmath7 * alice chooses the secret vectors @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( alice s private key ) . *
alice randomly generates and publishes the matrix @xmath10 ( alice s matrix public key ) .
* bob chooses the secret vectors @xmath11 and @xmath12 ( bob s private key ) . *
bob randomly generates and publishes the matrix @xmath13 ( bob s matrix public key ) .
* alice computes and publishes the matrix @xmath14 ( alice s public key ) .
* bob computes and publishes the matrix @xmath15 ( bob s public key ) . * alice calculates the secret matrix @xmath16 * bob calculates the secret matrix @xmath17 . *
the established secret key is @xmath18 it is assumed in @xcite , that the matrices @xmath19 and @xmath20 are different to give the non - commutativity assumption @xmath21 and @xmath22 . in general ,
even more strong assumption @xmath23 is not enough for this non - commutativity . also , there is a remark in @xcite that the following assumption @xmath24 should be satisfied in order to increase the security .
but by the classical cayley - hamilton theorem every matrix @xmath19 is a root of its own characteristic polynomial @xmath25 , where @xmath26 is the identity matrix of size @xmath3 .
the degree of @xmath27 is exactly @xmath28 .
then for any matrix @xmath10 and every matrix polynomial @xmath29 one has @xmath30 where @xmath31 is the remainder after division of the polynomial @xmath29 by @xmath32 hence , there is no sense to use in the protocol above polynomials of degrees @xmath33
we will provide two approaches to cryptanalysis of the protocol described in the previous section .
the first one is based on some simple facts from linear algebra and the second one is based on a linear decomposition attack . as we have seen in the previous section , there is no sense to use values @xmath34 .
thus we can assume that @xmath35 .
consider the linear systems @xmath36 of @xmath37 equations with @xmath38 unknowns @xmath39 and @xmath40 .
having a solution of the systems ( [ eq : systems ] ) one can compute the secret key as follows @xmath41 solution of a system of @xmath28 equations with @xmath28 unknowns using gauss elimination requires @xmath42 time .
thus solution of the systems ( [ eq : systems ] ) requires @xmath43 time . having precomputed values @xmath44 and @xmath45 ,
for @xmath46 , one can perform the step ( [ eq : key_computation ] ) in @xmath47 time .
so the overall time complexity for this approach is @xmath47 .
further we will describe the second approach based on a linear decomposition attack .
the algebra @xmath48 has a structure of a vector space over @xmath1 of dimension @xmath49 let @xmath50 be the semigroup generated by @xmath51 and let @xmath52 be the semigroup generated by @xmath53 a basis of the subspace sp@xmath54 can be effectively constructed as follows .
let @xmath55 be the sets of matrices considered as vectors .
define @xmath56 for @xmath57 the vector space spanned by the indicated set .
we choose a basis @xmath58 of @xmath59 , then extend @xmath60 to basis @xmath61 of @xmath62 , and so on . if for some @xmath63 we get @xmath64 then clearly @xmath65 is a basis of sp@xmath54 . by the cayley - hamilton theorem
one has @xmath66 in construction of @xmath67 we only use the gauss elimination process that is polynomial .
note , that we can do it offline , so we will call this phase the _ offline phase_. let @xmath68 be a basis of sp@xmath54 , where @xmath69 .
now we are ready to recover the secret key @xmath70 ( _ online phase _ ) .
now we will provide a rough estimate for the time complexity of the approach above .
observe that the number of the field operations in gauss elimination performed on a matrix of size @xmath74 is @xmath75 .
a basis of sp@xmath54 consist of at most @xmath37 elements , so it requires @xmath76 time to construct it .
computing @xmath77 in ( [ eq : b ] ) by solving a system of linear equations using gauss elimination requires @xmath43 time . having precomputed values @xmath78 and @xmath79 ,
for @xmath80 , one can perform the step ( [ eq : key_computation_2 ] ) in @xmath81 time .
so the offline phase could be done in @xmath82 time , the online phase could be done in @xmath43 time , and the overall time complexity is @xmath82 .
v. t. markov , a. v. mihalyov , a. v. gribov , p. a. zolotyh , and s. s. skazhenik , _ quasigroups and rings in coding and cryptoschemes constructing _ , prikladnaya discretnaya matematika , 4 ( 2012 ) , 3552 ( in russian ) . v. a. romankov , _ linear decomposition attack on public key exchange protocols using semidirect products of ( semi)groups _ , preprint , http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01152v1[arxiv:1501.01152v1 [ cs.cr ] ] , 6 jan . 2015 .
x. wang , c. xu , g. li , h. lin , and w. wang , _ double shielded public key cryptosystems _ ,
cryptology eprint archive , report 2014/558 , version 20140718:185200 , 2014 , 114 , https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/558 .
m. habeeb , d. kahrobaei , c. koupparis , and v. shpilrain , _ public key exchange using semidirect product of ( semi)groups _ , in : _
acns 2013 _ , volume 7954 of _ lecture notes comp .
_ , p. 475486
, springer , 2013 .
d. kahrobaei , h. t. lam , and v. shpilrain , _ public key exchange using extensions by endomorphisms and matrices over a galois field _ , preprint , http://www.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/~shpil/semi_galois.pdf[http://www.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/shpil/semi_galois.pdf ] .
b. tsaban , _ the conjugacy problem : cryptanalytic approaches to a problem of dehn _ , minicourse , dsseldorf university , germany , july - august 2012 , http://reh.math.uni-duesseldorf.de/~gcgta/slides/tsaban_minicourses.pdf[http://reh.math.uni-duesseldorf.de/gcgta/slides/tsaban_minicourses.pdf ] .
b. tsaban , _ polynomial time solutions of computational problems in noncommutative - algebraic cryptography _ , journal of cryptology , 28 ( 2015 ) , p. 601622
, see also http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.8114v3[arxiv:1210.8114v3 [ cs.cr ] ] .
b. tsaban , _ practical polynomial time solutions of several major problems in noncommutative - algebraic cryptography ( preliminary announcement ) _ , iacr eprint 2014/041 .
version 20140115:201530 , jan . | note apply practical deterministic attack on protocol in @xcite attack introduced by first author in @xcite developed works when platform objects linear case contrary to common opinion security assumptions need solve underlying algorithmic problems to break scheme another algorithm recovers private keys without solving principal algorithmic problem security efficacy attack depends on platform group requires specific analysis each case attack in polynomial time in size data when platform and related groups given together with linear representations other cases use known linear presentations of groups theoretical base for decomposition method described in @xcite series examples presented @xcite solves protocols based conjugacy search problem decomposition and factorization problems actions by automorphisms other protocols see @xcite and @xcite linear decomposition attack applied to main protocols in @xcite tsaban presented approach for provable polynomial time solutions of computational problems in groups with efficient faithful representation matrix groups denote by @xmath0 of nonnegative integers @xmath1 complex numbers describe andrecut s key exchange protocol in @xcite introduce necessary terminology give cryptanalysis of protocol@xmath2 complex matrix size @xmath3 variable @xmath4 two complex polynomials @xmath5 defined by complex vectors coefficients @xmath6 @xmath7 alice chooses secret vectors @xmath8 @xmath9 generates publishes matrix @xmath10 bob chooses vectors @xmath11 @xmath12 private key bob generates publishes matrix @xmath13 alice computes publishes matrix @xmath14 bob computes publishes matrix @xmath15 public key alice calculates secret matrix @xmath16 bob calculates secret matrix @xmath17 established secret key @xmath18 matrices @xmath19 @xmath20 different non - commutativity assumption @xmath21 @xmath22 strong assumption @xmath23 not enough non - commutativity remark assumption @xmath24 satisfied increase security cayley - hamilton theorem matrix @xmath19 root characteristic polynomial @xmath25 @xmath26 identity matrix size @xmath3 degree @xmath27 @xmath28matrix @xmath10 polynomial @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 remainder after division polynomial @xmath29 by @xmath32 no sense use protocol above polynomials degrees @xmath33 two approaches to cryptanalysis protocol first facts linear algebra second linear decomposition attack no sense use values @xmath34 assume @xmath35 linear systems @xmath36 @xmath37 equations with @xmath38 unknowns @xmath39 @xmath40 solution of systems compute secret key @xmath41 solution system @xmath28 equations unknowns gauss elimination requires @xmath42 time requires @xmath43 time precomputed values @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 perform step key_computation in @xmath47 time overall time complexity @xmath47 second approach linear decomposition attack algebra @xmath48 structure vector space over @xmath1 dimension @xmath49 @xmath50 semigroup @xmath51 @xmath52 semigroup @xmath53 basis subspace sp@xmath54 constructed @xmath55 sets of matrices vectors define @xmath56 for @xmath57 vector space spanned by indicated setchoose basis @xmath58 @xmath59 extend @xmath60 to @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 get @xmath64 @xmath65 basis sp@xmath54 cayley - hamilton theorem has @xmath66 construction @xmath67 use gauss elimination process polynomial offline @xmath68 basis of sp@xmath54 @xmath69 recover secret key @xmath70 online phase rough estimate time complexity approach number field operations in gauss elimination on matrix size @xmath74 is @xmath75 basis sp@xmath54 @xmath37 elements requires @xmath76 time construct computing @xmath77 gauss elimination requires @xmath43 time precomputed values @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 perform step_computation in @xmath81 time offline phase @xmath82 time online phase @xmath43 time overall time complexity @xmath82 v. t. markov. mihalyov. gribov p. a. zolotyh s. s. skazhenik quasigroups rings coding cryptoschemes constructing prikladnaya matematika , 4 ( 2012 ) , 3552 russianromankov linear decomposition attack public key exchange protocols semidirect products preprint http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01152v1 6 jan 2015 x. wang. xu g li h lin w. wang double shielded public key cryptosystems eprint archive report 2014/558 version 20140718:185200 https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/558 m. habeeb d. kahrobaei c. koupparis v. shpilrain public key exchange semidirect)groups acns 2013 volume 7954 lecture notes p. 475486 d. kahrobaei t lam v. shpilrain public key exchange extensions endomorphisms matrices galois field preprint http://www.sci.ccny.cuny/semi_galois.pdf tsaban conjugacy problem approaches problem dehn minicourse dsseldorf university germany july august 2012.math.uni-duesseldorftsaban polynomial time solutions noncommutative algebraic cryptography journal cryptology 28 2015 p. 601622.org.8114v3:1210.8114v3 tsaban polynomial time solutions problems noncommutative algebraic cryptography announcement iacr eprint 2014/041 version 20140115:201530 | 0.360862 | 2,207 | 1,177 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,211 | we show that if @xmath0 is an upper semicontinuous decomposition of @xmath1 , @xmath2 , into convex sets , then the quotient space @xmath3 is a codimension one manifold factor .
in particular , we show that @xmath3 has the disjoint arc - disk property . | a space @xmath4 is said to be a _ codimension one manifold factor _ provided that @xmath5 is a manifold .
it is a long standing unsolved problem as to whether all resolvable generalized manifolds are codimension one manifold factors @xcite .
this is the so - called product with a line problem and it is the essence of the famous generalized r. l. moore problem @xcite .
the product with a line problem speaks directly to one of the most fundamental questions in geometric topology , which is how to recognize manifolds @xcite . because manifolds have a rich structure which is useful to exploit in many areas of mathematics and its applications , it is important to recognize when one is dealing with a space that is a manifold .
one notable example is the relevance of the product with a line problem to the famous busemann conjecture in metric geometry @xcite .
one might wonder even if a decomposition of @xmath1 into convex sets could give rise to a decomposition space topologically distinct from @xmath1 .
this problem was investigated for several years beginning with bing in the 1950 s @xcite . in 1970 ,
armentrout @xcite produced the first example of a decomposition of @xmath6 into convex sets that yields a non - manifold .
then in 1975 , eaton @xcite demonstrated that a certain decomposition of @xmath6 into points and straight line segments , originally proposed by bing @xcite , is indeed topologically distinct from @xmath6 .
hence , this type of complexity is significant .
it should also be noted that there are no known examples of a non - manifold resulting from a decomposition of @xmath7 into convex sets . in this paper
we shall investigate how the type of complexity represented by decompositions of @xmath1 into convex sets can affect the classification of a decomposition space as a codimension one manifold factor .
we shall demonstrate that decompositions of @xmath1 , @xmath2 , into convex sets are always codimension one manifold factors .
in particular , we shall show that such spaces have a particularly strong general position property , the disjoint arc - disk property .
we briefly review some basic definitions and notations . recall that a map @xmath8 is said to be _ proper _ if whenever @xmath9 is a compact subset of @xmath10 , then @xmath11 is compact .
there are various equivalent definitions of upper semicontinuous decompositions @xcite , but the following will be the most useful for our purposes : a decomposition @xmath0 of @xmath12 into compact sets is said to be _ upper semicontinuous _ ( usc ) if and only if the associated decomposition map @xmath13 is a proper map . a compact subset @xmath9 of a space @xmath4
is said to be _ cell - like _ if for each neighborhood @xmath14 of @xmath9 in @xmath4 , @xmath9 can be contracted to a point inside @xmath14 @xcite .
a usc decomposition @xmath0 of @xmath12 is said to be _ cell - like _ if each element @xmath15 is cell - like .
a map @xmath16 is said to be _ cell - like _ if for each @xmath17 , @xmath18 is cell - like .
resolvable generalized n - manifold _ is an @xmath19-dimensional space @xmath4 that is the image of a cell - like map @xmath20 where @xmath12 is an @xmath19-manifold .
convex sets are contractible , and hence they are cell - like .
thus , a usc decomposition @xmath0 of @xmath1 into convex sets is a cell - like decomposition and the associated decomposition map @xmath21 is a cell - like map .
the fact that @xmath3 is finite - dimensional follows from a result of zemke ( see ( * ? ? ? * theorem 5.2 ) ) .
therefore , in this setting , @xmath3 is a resolvable generalized @xmath19-manifold . for resolvable generalized manifolds
, we have the following very useful approximate lifting theorem , which follows from ( * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* theorem 17.1 and corollary 16.12b ) : [ alt ] suppose that @xmath0 is a cell - like decomposition of a manifold @xmath12 , with decomposition map @xmath22 , and that the quotient space @xmath23 is finite - dimensional .
then for any map @xmath24 of a finite - dimensional compact polyhedron @xmath25 , and any @xmath26 , there exists a map @xmath27 such that @xmath28 is an @xmath29-approximation of @xmath30 .
general position properties are very useful in detecting codimension one manifold factors @xcite . for our results
, we shall only need to employ the following : a space @xmath4 is said to have the _ disjoint arc - disk property _
( dadp ) provided that any two maps @xmath31 and @xmath32 can be approximated by maps with disjoint images , where @xmath33 denotes the unit interval and @xmath34 denotes a disk .
the following theorem was demonstrated in ( * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* proposition 2.10 ) : [ dadp thm ] a resolvable generalized manifold having dadp is a codimension one manifold factor .
useful in discussions of the dadp is the local @xmath35-co - connectedness property .
a set @xmath36 is said to have the _ local @xmath35-co - connectedness property _
( @xmath35-lcc ) in @xmath4 if for every @xmath37 , each neighborhood @xmath14 of @xmath38 contains another neighborhood @xmath39 of @xmath38 so that any two points in @xmath40 are path connected in @xmath41 .
note that if @xmath25 is nowhere dense in @xmath4 , then @xmath42 .
the following theorem can be found in ( * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* corollary 26.2a ) : [ 0-lcc ] each @xmath43-dimensional closed subset of a generalized @xmath19-manifold , where @xmath44 , is @xmath35-lcc . since a @xmath43-dimensional closed subset of a generalized @xmath19-manifold @xmath4 , where @xmath45 , is nowhere dense in @xmath4 , we have the following corollary : [ path ] if @xmath25 is a @xmath43-dimensional closed subset of a generalized @xmath19-manifold @xmath4 , where @xmath44 , then any path @xmath46 can be approximated by a path @xmath47 .
the main result of this paper is the following theorem : let @xmath0 be an upper semicontinuous decomposition of @xmath1 into convex sets , where @xmath2 .
then @xmath3 is a codimension one manifold factor .
this theorem will follow immediately as a corollary of theorem [ dadp thm ] and the following theorem : [ dadp-4 thm ] let @xmath0 be an upper semicontinuous decomposition of @xmath1 into convex sets , where @xmath2
. then @xmath3 has the dadp .
let @xmath48 and @xmath49 .
it follows from corollary [ path ] that it suffices to show that there is an @xmath29-approximation @xmath50 of @xmath30 such that @xmath51 is @xmath52-dimensional .
let @xmath53 be a piecewise linear map , that is an @xmath54-approximate lift of @xmath30 .
we shall show that @xmath55 is then the desired map .
let @xmath56 denote a triangulation of @xmath57 .
we claim that if @xmath58 is a @xmath52-simplex of @xmath56 , then @xmath59 is @xmath52-dimensional . to see this ,
let @xmath60 be the decomposition induced over @xmath61 , i.e. @xmath60 is the decomposition of @xmath1 having as the only nontrivial elements , the nontrivial elements of @xmath0 that meet @xmath58 .
let @xmath62 be the associated decomposition map .
note that @xmath63 is necessarily a proper map , being a decomposition induced over a closed set in the decomposition space of a usc decomposition .
let @xmath64 be the @xmath52-dimensional plane in @xmath65 that contains @xmath58 .
let @xmath66 denote the restriction of @xmath63 to @xmath64 .
then @xmath66 is also a proper map .
thus @xmath66 determines a usc decomposition of the plane into convex sets , elements that do not separate the plane .
it now follows from a classical result of moore @xcite , that @xmath66 is a near - homeomorphism onto its image .
thus @xmath67 is at most @xmath52-dimensional .
but @xmath67 is homeomorphic to @xmath68 , which in turn is homeomorphic to @xmath61 .
thus @xmath61 is at most @xmath52-dimensional subset of @xmath3 .
hence @xmath69 is a @xmath52-dimensional subset of the generalized @xmath19-manifold @xmath3 @xcite .
as we have seen , the complexity represented by decompositions into convex sets does not inhibit a decomposition space from being a codimension one manifold factor .
the fact that such spaces satisfy the dadp is a pleasant result .
it is well known that not all codimension one manifold factors satisfy the dadp , and hence the dadp is not a general position property that provides a characterization of codimension one manifold factors .
in fact , the dadp condition is a relatively weak tool for detecting codimension one manifold factors , compared to other general position properties such as : * the disjoint homotopies property @xcite ; * the plentiful @xmath52-manifolds property @xcite ; * the @xmath35-stitched disks property @xcite ; * the method of @xmath70-fractured maps @xcite ; and * the disjoint topographies ( or disjoint concordance ) property @xcite .
r. j. daverman and d. m. halverson , _ path concordances as detectors of codimension - one manifold factors _ , exotic homology manifolds , oberwolfach 2003 , geom .
* 9 * , geom . topol .
coventry , 2006 , pp . 715 .
d. m. halverson and d. repov , _ a survey on the generalized r. l. moore problem _ , proc .
`` computational and geometric topology '' ( bertinoro , italy , june 17 - 19 , 2010 ) , atti semin . mat .
modena reggio emilia * 58 * ( 2011 ) , 175191 .
d. repov , _ detection of higher dimensional topological manifolds among topological spaces _ , giornate di topologia e geometria delle variet , bologna 1990 , m. ferri , ed .
degli studi di bologna 1992 , pp . | space @xmath4 codimension one manifold factor provided @xmath5 manifold long standing unsolved problem all resolvable generalized manifolds codimension one manifold factors product with a line problem essence of r. l. moore problem product line problem speaks fundamental geometric topology recognize manifolds manifolds rich structure useful mathematics important to recognize dealing with space manifold relevance product line problem to busemann conjecture in geometry decomposition of @xmath1 into convex sets decomposition space topologically distinct from @xmath1 problem investigated years bing 1950 s 1970 armentrout @xcite first example decomposition of @xmath6 into convex sets non - manifold 1975 eaton @xcite demonstrated decomposition of @xmath6 into points straight line segments bing topologically distinct from @xmath6 complexity significant no known examples of non - manifold from decomposition of @xmath7 into convex sets paper investigate complexity decompositions of @xmath1 into convex sets affect classification decomposition space as codimension one manifold factordemonstrate decompositions of @xmath1 into convex sets codimension one manifold factors spaces strong position property disjoint arc - disk property review definitions notations map @xmath8 proper if @xmath9 compact subset of @xmath10 @xmath11 compact definitions of upper semicontinuous decompositions decomposition @xmath0 of @xmath12 into compact sets upper semicontinuous if decomposition map @xmath13 proper compact subset @xmath9 of space @xmath4 cell - like if neighborhood @xmath14 contracted inside @xmath14 decomposition @xmath0 of @xmath12 cell - like if each element @xmath15 cell - like map @xmath16 cell - like if @xmath17 cell - like resolvable generalized n - manifold @xmath19-dimensional space @xmath4 image of cell - like map @xmath20 @xmath12 @xmath19-manifold convex sets contractible cell - like decomposition @xmath0 of @xmath1 into convex sets cell - like decomposition decomposition map @xmath21 cell - like @xmath3 finite - dimensional result of zemke theorem 5.2@xmath3 resolvable generalized @xmath19-manifold manifolds approximate lifting theorem from theorem 17.1 corollary 16.12b @xmath0 cell - like decomposition of manifold @xmath12 decomposition map @xmath22 quotient space @xmath23 finite - map @xmath24 finite - dimensional compact polyhedron @xmath25 @xmath26 map @xmath27 @xmath28 is @xmath29-approximation of @xmath30 general position properties useful detecting codimension one manifold factors space @xmath4 disjoint arc - disk property dadp two maps @xmath31 and @xmath32 approximated by disjoint images @xmath33 unit interval @xmath34 disk theorem demonstrated in proposition 2.10 resolvable generalized manifold dadp is codimension one manifold factor local @xmath35-co - connectedness property @xmath36 local @xmath35-co - connectedness property in @xmath4 @xmath37 neighborhood @xmath14 of @xmath38 contains neighborhood @xmath39 of @xmath38 two points in @xmath40 path connected in @xmath41 if @xmath25 dense in @xmath4 @xmath42 theorem in corollary 26.2a )-lcc each @xmath43-dimensional subset of @xmath19-manifold @xmath44 is @xmath35-lcc @xmath43-dimensional subset-manifold @xmath4 dense in @xmath4 corollary path if @xmath25 is @xmath43-dimensional subset @xmath19-manifold @xmath4 path @xmath46 approximated by @xmath47 result @xmath0 upper semicontinuous decomposition of @xmath1 into convex sets @xmath2 @xmath3 is codimension one manifold factor theorem corollary theorem dadp dadp-4 @xmath0 upper semicontinuous decomposition @xmath1 into convex sets @xmath2 @xmath3 has dadp @xmath48 and @xmath49 @xmath29-approximation @xmath50 of @xmath30 @xmath51 is @xmath52-dimensional @xmath53 piecewise linear map @xmath54-approximate lift of @xmath30 @xmath55 is desired map @xmath56 triangulation of @xmath57 @xmath58 is @xmath52-simplex of @xmath56 @xmath59 is @xmath52-dimensional@xmath60 decomposition induced over @xmath61 decomposition of @xmath1 only nontrivial elements @xmath0 @xmath58 @xmath62 associated decomposition map @xmath63 proper map decomposition induced over closed set space usc decomposition @xmath64 @xmath52-dimensional plane in @xmath65 @xmath58 @xmath66 restriction of @xmath63 to @xmath64 proper map @xmath66 determines usc decomposition plane into convex sets separate plane @xmath66 near - homeomorphism onto image @xmath67 @xmath52-dimensional homeomorphic to @xmath68 homeomorphic to @xmath61 @xmath61 @xmath52-dimensional subset of @xmath3 @xmath69 is @xmath52-dimensional subset of @xmath19-manifold @xmath3 complexity by decompositions into convex sets inhibit decomposition space codimension one manifold factor spaces satisfy dadp pleasant result not all codimension one manifold factors satisfy dadp not general position property codimension one manifold factorsdadp condition weak detecting codimension one manifold factors compared position properties disjoint homotopies @xmath52-manifolds @xmath35-stitched disks @xmath70-fractured maps disjoint topographies daverman d. halverson path concordances detectors codimension - one manifold factors exotic homology manifolds oberwolfach 2003 geom. 9 topol coventry 2006 pp 715 halverson d. repov survey generalized r. l. moore problem computational geometric topology bertinoro june 17 - 19 2010 atti semin . mat modena reggio emilia 58 2011 175191 d repov detection higher topological manifolds topological spaces giornate di topologia geometria variet bologna 1990 ferri studi bologna 1992 | 0.355778 | 2,516 | 1,363 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,213 | high - resolution x - ray scattering , in the presence of an applied current , has been used for studying the stability of the charge ordered phase of manganese oxides upon current biasing .
we find that the charge ordered structure is unchanged when a current is flowing in the sample .
such a result indicates that the non - linear conduction observed in charge ordered manganites can not be ascribed to a current - induced destabilisation of charge ordering .
rare earth manganites with general chemical formula @xmath0 ( where @xmath1 and @xmath2 being trivalent rare - earth and divalent ions , respectively ) show a wide variety of electronic and magnetic properties such as colossal magnetoresistance and charge ( co ) or orbital ordering ( oo).@xcite the physics of the detabilization of the co by different types of perturbation has recently been under very active investigation.@xcite for instance , it is now well established that the co is stabilized by lattice distortions ; thus , a perturbation of this distortion by changing the average - a - site cationic radius can weaken the co.@xcite besides , it has been reported that irradiation by x - rays@xcite or light and application of pressure@xcite can also induce a melting of the co , leading to a transition from a charge - localized state ( cl ) to a charge - delocalized state ( cd ) .
application of an electric field is also known to induce a cl - cd transformation ; this latter feature is always associated with a strong non - linearity of the tension - current characteristics ( v - i).@xcite up to now , the optical and irradiation induced transition are argued to be the result of classical percolation transport in a non - homogeneous medium ; however , it is not clear whether the underlying mechanism is the same for all perturbations , in particular for the electric field induced transition . in the latter case
, this feature is interpreted in terms of current induced destabilization of the co - cl state leading to the creation of low resistivity conducting path along the current flow.@xcite recent experimental results do not agree with such a current - induced co melting scenario.@xcite indeed , electrical measurements , performed on the non - charge ordered compounds pr@xmath3ca@xmath4mno@xmath5 , also exhibit a current induced cl - cd transition associated with a strong non linearity of the v - i characteristics .
in such a case , the destruction of the co can not be invoked , suggesting that the mechanism is more complex than the one initially proposed . in this paper , we present synchrotron x - ray diffraction data for the charge - ordered manganites pr@xmath6ca@xmath7mno@xmath5 and nd@xmath8ca@xmath9mno@xmath5 polycrystalline samples .
details for synthesis of the sample are reported elsewhere.@xcite measurements have been performed as a function of temperature _ and current _ on the diffractometer id31 at esrf ( grenoble , france ) using an incident wavelength of 0.413 ( e=30 kev ) .
the typical sizes of the samples allow a homogeneous sample cooling together with suitable beam transmission .
two contacts of in were soldered onto the section ( 1x2 mm@xmath10 ) of the sample , leaving an uncovered section l= 3 mm .
v - i data were taken with current biasing ( keithley 236 ) .
our x - rays diffraction patterns , analyzed with the rietveld method , lead to an orthorhombic cell with @xmath11 @xmath12 , @xmath13 in a @xmath14 space group at room temperature .
previous neutron - diffraction measurements@xcite showed that the co structure is characterized by a doubling of the a - axis and the appearance of additional peaks of the type ( h/2 k l ) .
a careful search was made for such superlattice peaks associated with charge ordering of @xmath15and @xmath16 in pr@xmath6ca@xmath7mno@xmath5 and nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 below @xmath18 = 235k and 200k , respectively .
figure 1 shows narrow regions covering the strongest of these peaks for nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 at a temperature below @xmath18 ( @xmath19 , solid line ) together with the results of similar scans for t=295k @xmath18 ( symbols ) . in the latter case ,
no superlattice peaks can be observed whereas , for t= 100 k the superlattice peaks are well defined .
high resolution x - ray scattering measurements in the presence of an applied direct current would permit to determine unambiguously whether the current induced cl - cd transition associated with the non - linear v - i characteristics can be linked to a co destruction .
transport properties were simultaneously measured in situ during the experiments . a strong non - linearity i. e a deviation from the ohm s law ,
is observed when the bias current attains a threshold value for pr@xmath6ca@xmath7mno@xmath5 and nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 powder samples .
this non - linearity is even more obvious when @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 curves are plotted ( see figure 2a and 2b ) .
as expected the resistance is independent of the bias current in the ohmic regime and is strongly decreased for a critical value of the current.@xcite one can observe that the current value where the non - linearity sets in and the width of the transition are strongly temperature dependent ( both increase as the temperature increases ) . because of the rounding of the variation of @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 , it is very difficult to define a value for a critical current .
however , a rough estimate gives @xmath23 = 4 ma and 1 ma for pr@xmath24ca@xmath7mno@xmath5 and nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 , respectively .
the temperature dependence of the lattice parameters in these compounds is rather complex .
it is well known that their temperature behavior is characterized by the presence of changes of slopes corresponding to the characteristic structural and magnetic ordering temperatures.@xcite for t@xmath18 , a comparison of the current _ and _ temperature dependence of the cell volume determined from the synchrotron x - ray diffraction data allows us to discard definitely any joule heating effect .
indeed , no evolution of the cell volume is observed as a function of the applied current ( imax = 10 ma , well above the value of the current for which the non - linearity sets in ) whereas , in the range of temperature above 100k , a steep increase of the cell volume is observed with zero biased current ( see figure 3 for nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 ) .
such a result is found for both composition pr@xmath6ca@xmath7mno@xmath5 and nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno@xmath25 figure 4a and 4b show for both compounds the integrated intensity of the superlattice peaks corresponding to the co as a function of the applied current . in figure 5 ,
a characteristic portion of the x - ray diffraction patterns is shown at 100k with i = 0 , 1 and 5 ma .
the shapes and the intensities of the superlattice peaks are not modified whatever the value of the applied current lying in the ohmic or non - ohmic region
. such a result does not give a direct interpretation of the process involved in the non - linear conduction but , at least , allows us to discard any co destabilization as an origin for this feature .
other interpretations , based on a preserved superstructure when a current is flowing , must now be proposed . in charge
ordered compounds , observation of non - linear conduction setting in along with a large broad band noise suggests that the charge ordered state gets depinned at the onset of the non - linear regime.@xcite besides , the possibility of a charge density wave ( cdw ) condensate in this charge ordered regime of the manganese oxides is now well established.@xcite this might be a track to explain the occurrence of the non - linear conduction in such systems .
recently , we have proposed an interpretation in terms of collective excitation of cdws.@xcite in such a framework , the non - linear conduction arises from the motion of the cdw domains which carries a net electrical current . e. o. wollan and w. c. koehler , phys . rev . *
100 * , 545 ( 1955 ) ; j. b. goodenough , _ ibid .
_ * 100 * , 564 ( 1955 ) . for a review , see _ colossal magnetoresistance , charge ordering and related properties of manganese oxides , _ edited by c. n. r.rao and b. raveau ( world scientific , singapore , 1998 ) and _ colossal magnetoresistive oxides _ , edited by y. tokura ( gordon and breach science , new york ) .
s. jin , t. h. tiefel , m. mccormack , r. a. fastnacht , r. ramesh , and l. h. chen , science * 264 * , 413 ( 1994 ) ; r. von helmolt , j. wecker , b. holzapfel , l. schultz , and k. samwer , phys .
rev .
lett .
* 71 * , 2331 ( 1993 ) .
m. r. lees , j. barratt , g. balakrishnan , d. mck .
paul , and m. yethiraj , phys .
rev .
b. * 52 * , r14 303 ( 1995 ) .
h. yoshizawa , h. kawano , y. tomioka , and y. tokura , phys .
rev .
b. * 52 * , r13 145 ( 1995 ) .
y. tomioka , a. asamitsu , y. moritomo , and y. tokura , j. phys .
. jpn . * 64 * , 3626 ( 1995 ) .
v. kiryukhin , d. casa , j. p. hill , b. keimer , a. vigliante , y. tomioka , and y. tokura , nature ( london ) * 386 * , 813 ( 1997 ) .
m. fiebig , k. miyano , y. tomioka and y. tokura , science * 280 * , 1925 ( 1998 ) .
k. ogawa , w. wei , k. miyano , y. tomioka and y. tokura , phys .
rev .
b * 57 * , r15033 ( 1998 ) .. y. moritomo , h. kuwahara , y. tomioka and y. tokura , phys . rev .
b * 55 * , 7549 ( 1997 ) .
a. guha , a. raychaudhuri , a. raju and c. n. r. rao , phys .
rev .
b * 62*,5320 ( 2000 ) . c. martin , a. maignan , m. hervieu , and b. raveau , phys .
rev .
b * 60 * , 12 191 ( 1999 ) .
a. asamitsu et @xmath26 , nature * 388 * , 50 ( 1997 ) .
a. guha , n. khare , a. raychaudhuri and c. n. r. rao , phys .
rev .
b * 62*,r11941 ( 2000 ) c. n. r. rao , a. raju , v. ponnambalam , s. parashar and n. kumar , phys . rev .
b * 61 * , 594 ( 2000 ) r. c. budhani , n. k. pandey , p. padhan , s. srivastava and r. p. s. m. lobo , phys .
rev .
b * 65 * , 014429 ( 2001 ) s. mercone , a. wahl , ch .
simon and c. martin , phys .
rev .
b * 65 * , 214428 ( 2002 ) .
a. maignan , c. martin , f. damay , and b. raveau , z. phys .
b * 104 * , 21 ( 1997 ) .
z. jirk , s. krupika , z. ima , m. dlouh , and s. vratislav , j. magn .
magn . mater .
* 53 * , 153 ( 1985 ) .
d. e. cox , p. g. radaelli , m. marezio and s-w.cheong , phys .
rev .
b * 57 * 3305 ( 1998 ) .
a. wahl , s. mercone , a. pautrat , m. pollet , ch .
simon , submitted to phys .
rev .
b a. guha , a . gosh , a. raychaudhuri , s .
parashar , a. raju and c. n. r. rao , app .
phys .
lett . * 75 * 3381 ( 1999 ) n. kida and m. tonouchi , phys .
rev .
b * 66 * , 024401 ( 2002 ) .
y. d chuang , a. d. gromko , d. s. dessau , t. kimura and y. tokura , science * 292 * , 1509 ( 2001 ) t. asaka , s. yamada , s. tsutsumi , c. tsuruta , k.kimoto , t. arima and y. matsui , phys .
rev .
lett .
* 88 * , 097201 ( 2002 ) g. grner , rev .
mod .
phys . * 60 * , 1129 ( 1988 ) and references therein . | figure 1 : : : portion of the synchrotron x - ray diffraction patterns for nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 at 100k with zero bias , in the region of the @xmath27 ( a)@xmath28 @xmath29 ( 122 ) ( b ) and @xmath30 ( c ) superlattice peaks .
figure 2 : : : @xmath31 versus bias current at 100k for nd@xmath32ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 ( a ) and pr@xmath6ca@xmath7mno@xmath5 ( b ) .
the arrow denotes the estimated treshold current .
figure 3 : : : cell volume versus temperature for zero bias ( filled symbol , lower scale ) and cell volume versus bias current at 100k ( upper scale ) figure 4 : : : integrated intensity of the @xmath33erlattice peaks as a function of the bias current at 100k .
a ) nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 ; b ) pr@xmath34ca@xmath7mno@xmath25 the arrows denote the occurence of the non - linear regime .
figure 5 : : portion of the x - ray diffraction patterns for nd@xmath8ca@xmath35mno@xmath5 at 100k with bias 0 ma , 1 ma and 5 ma in the region of the @xmath36 superlattice peak . | figure 1 synchrotron x - ray diffraction patterns nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 100k zero bias @xmath27 @xmath29 @xmath30 superlattice peaks 2 @xmath31 versus bias current 100k nd@xmath32ca@xmath17mno@xmath5 pr@xmath6ca arrow estimated treshold current 3 cell volume versus temperature zero bias bias current 100k 4 integrated intensity @xmath33erlattice peaks bias current at 100k nd@xmath8ca@xmath17mno pr@xmath34ca@xmath7mno arrows non - linear regime 5 x - ray diffraction patterns nd@xmath8ca@xmath35mno@xmath5 100k bias 0 ma 1 ma 5 ma @xmath36 superlattice peak | 0.071108 | 349 | 194 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
199,214 | suto et al . ( 1996 , , 461 , l33 ) have suggested that an x - ray halo in the local group might explain both the observed low - energy excess in the x - ray background and the quadrupole anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background .
recent observations of poor groups of galaxies by the @xmath0 pspc set reasonable limits on how extensive and dense such a halo could be .
the poor groups most similar to the local group do not have a detectable halo , and the upper limits of these observations suggest that any local group halo would be nearly two orders of magnitude too tenuous to produce the effects suto et al .
( 1996 ) discuss .
in particular , the sunyaev - zeldovich effect can not contribute significantly to the quadrupole anisotropy measured by cobe . | hot , x - ray emitting gas is an important component of the gaseous content of the universe .
it usually dominates the interstellar medium of elliptical galaxies ( @xcite ) .
it also accounts for most of the baryonic mass of rich clusters of galaxies and up to 30% of their total gravitating mass ( @xcite ) .
such observations led suto et al .
( 1996 ; hereafter smio ) to suggest that the local group of galaxies might have a substantial x - ray halo of its own .
this hypothesized hot intragroup medium ( igm ) could contribute much of the excess in the soft ( @xmath11 kev ) x - ray background .
recent measurements have shown that this excess is well - fit by a thermal model with solar metallicity and a temperature of 0.16 kev ( @xcite ) .
determining the contributors to the x - ray background is crucial to understanding it .
furthermore , smio point out that such a local group x - ray halo would produce a significant quadrupole anisotropy in the microwave background through the sunyaev - zeldovich ( sz ) effect ( @xcite ) .
this quadrupole signature , @xmath2 , could in principle account for the entirety of the quadrupole signal observed by cobe : @xmath3k ( e.g. , @xcite ) .
the cobe measurement provides a critical constraint on cosmological models .
the power spectrum of primordial density fluctuations is usually parameterized as @xmath4 .
the spectral index @xmath5 is a primary component of any cosmological model , with the scale invariant value @xmath6 being the preferred `` natural '' value of inflationary models .
the cobe observations provide both the normalization @xmath7 and powerful constraints on @xmath5 .
the cobe normalization on large angular scales is far too high relative to the power on smaller ( galaxy to cluster ) scales for the predictions of the `` standard '' @xmath6 cold dark matter model ( e.g. , @xcite ) .
the need for relatively more power on large scales as indicated by cobe is a primary motivation for considering contrived models with admixtures of hot as well as cold dark matter .
a significant local contribution to @xmath8 through the sz effect would alter the range of viable cosmological models significantly , perhaps even reviving standard cold dark matter .
it is therefore very important to place limits on the potential @xmath2 of the putative local group hot igm .
since we are embedded in the hot interstellar medium of the galaxy , it is exceedingly difficult to disentangle the possible contribution of a hot igm to the diffuse x - ray background from other , more local sources .
however , the local group can be placed in context of observations of other groups of galaxies .
while the suggestion of a significant local group igm was made as a parallel to the highly luminous intracluster media of rich clusters , groups provide a more enlightening comparison . with the advent of the @xmath0 pspc ,
many observations of galaxy groups of varying richness have been obtained , so such comparisons can be made .
while poor groups of galaxies tend to be somewhat more populated and more dense ( in projection ) than the local group , they provide a much better comparison for the x - ray properties of the local group than rich clusters .
the @xmath0 pspc has provided the necessary sensitivity and angular resolution to make a detailed study of the diffuse x - ray emission seen in some galaxy groups .
pspc observations reveal that , in general , x - ray
luminous groups contain more elliptical galaxies than spirals and the first - ranked galaxy in these groups is an elliptical ( pildis , bregman , & evrard 1995 , @xcite ) .
very few groups with a spiral majority ( the local group has no bright ellipticals ) have detected x - ray emission , perhaps due to their not being sufficiently compact to contain an igm or the temperature of the igm being too low for the pspc to detect .
lcccccc suto et al . & & 150 & @xmath9 & 1 & 2.3 & @xmath10 hcg 12 & e & 45 & @xmath11 & 0.72 & 7.8 & @xmath12 hcg 62 & e & 60 & @xmath13 & 1.1 & 5.8 & @xmath14 hcg 68 & e & 33 & @xmath15 & 0.98 & 10.6 & @xmath16 hcg 97 & e & 8 & @xmath17 & 0.97 & 43.8 & @xmath18 n2300 group & e / s & 27 & @xmath19 & 0.93 & 13.0 & @xmath20 hcg 2 & s & 33 & @xmath21 & 1 & 10.6 & @xmath22 hcg 10 & s & 33 & @xmath23 & 1 & 10.6 & @xmath24 hcg 44 & s & 33 & @xmath25 & 1 & 10.6 & @xmath26 hcg 79 & e & 33 & @xmath27 & 1 & 10.6 & @xmath28 hcg 93 & s & 33 & @xmath29 & 1 & 10.6 & @xmath30 since over two dozen galaxy groups have been detected with the pspc , their properties can be used to constrain models of the possible igm of the local group .
the relevant quantities are t , the temperature of the plasma , the column density , which one can parameterize as @xmath31 ( where @xmath32 is the central electron density and @xmath33 is the core radius ) , and the distance of the milky way from the center of the local group , @xmath34 .
smio assumed a local group igm with t=1 kev , @xmath32=@xmath35 @xmath36 , and @xmath33=150 kpc , and assumed @xmath34=350 kpc .
table 1 lists the values for these quantities for the groups analyzed by pildis et al .
( 1995 ) , as well as the values that smio assumed . for the purposes of this comparison
, we retain the value of @xmath34 used by smio , as if one were to replace the local group igm with that of the other groups .
three groups in the sample of pildis et al .
( 1995 ) are not included in table 1 because they are not spatially resolved in the pspc observations : hcg 4 , 92 , and 94 ( see @xcite for details ) .
the upper limits assume the typical core radius ( 33 kpc ) and temperature ( 1 kev ) observed in the x - ray luminous groups , and use a calculated central density determined from the 3@xmath37 upper limit on the number of counts within the group radius in their pspc observations ( @xcite ) .
mulchaey et al .
( 1996 ) do not list central densities , but find average temperatures of @xmath11 kev and core radii ranging from 9 kpc to over 300 kpc , with a median value of 43 kpc ( excluding the groups from @xcite ) .
note that the observed groups tend to have smaller values of @xmath33 and greater values of @xmath32 than smio assumed for the local group igm , while the values for t are similar .
figure 1 shows an expanded version of fig . 4 of smio , with the addition of the data presented in table 1 and smio s own model for the local group igm .
the theoretical curves follow from equation ( 9 ) of smio , @xmath38^{-1},\ ] ] where @xmath39 is the electron mass , @xmath40 the speed of light , @xmath41 the thomson scattering cross section , and @xmath42 is the boltzmann constant .
there is also a numerical fudge factor @xmath43 due to the spherical harmonic multipoles ( see equations 4 and 5 of smio ) which smio calculate numerically but do not explicitly state .
we have adopted @xmath44 to match their curve for @xmath45k .
one detected group , hcg 97 , does not appear on the graph due to its large value of @xmath34/@xmath33 .
note that the ngc 2300 group , which is dominated by neither spirals nor ellipticals , has the lowest value of @xmath31 t of all the detections .
even the brightest elliptical - dominated groups in the pildis et al .
( 1995 ) sample fall well short of producing the observed @xmath46k . also well below the curve ,
puzzlingly enough , are the igm parameters assumed by smio .
it is rather mysterious why they explicitly suggest that `` the lg x - ray halo can potentially have a significant effect on the quadrupole of the cmb anisotropies '' when their own optimistic estimate of the local group parameters give @xmath47 .
the maximum quadrupole anisotropy consistent with the spiral - dominated groups appears to be 0.1 @xmath48k , a factor of 60 less than @xmath8 .
so , unless the local group is extremely unusual , any hot igm that it may contain is simply not relevant to the cobe quadrupole anisotropy measurement .
while it is clear that many systematic effects come into play in determining the characteristics of an igm from an x - ray observation ( notably the assumed metallicity of the gas and the background level of the observation ; see @xcite for an enlightening discussion ) , these effects could change the core radius and central density fitted to these groups by no more than a factor of a few , and likely much less .
the temperature of galaxy groups are well - determined to be close to 1 kev on average . with the further observation that the local group is less populated and more diffuse than even the average _ undetected _ spiral - dominated group
, it appears extremely unlikely that a local group igm could produce a significant fraction of the cobe quadrupole anisotropy .
perhaps a more plausible source for the soft excess in the x - ray background is a combination of the probable x - ray halo of the milky way plus emission from the local superbubble .
previous studies of the 1/4 and 3/4 kev x - ray backgrounds point towards their origination in the galaxy rather than the local group ( @xcite ) .
recent observations of x - ray shadowing by high - latitude molecular clouds demonstrates that the 3/4 kev background is dominated by emission from the local superbubble , while the 1/4 kev background is likely to arise from a patchy hot halo surrounding the milky way ( @xcite ) .
a significant fraction of spiral galaxies considered to be similar to our own galaxy are also seen to have patchy soft x - ray haloes ( @xcite ) .
since the x - ray emission in spiral - dominated groups is due solely to the component galaxies , there is no reason to expect that a local group igm would be an important component of the local x - ray background .
in light of the possibly substantial effect a local group x - ray emitting halo could have on the local soft x - ray and microwave backgrounds , as suggested by smio , we have considered the x - ray properties of poor groups of galaxies .
sparse , spiral - dominated groups like the local group have yet to be detected in x - rays , and even elliptical - dominated groups have low luminosities relative to rich clusters . we therefore conclude that 1 . unless the local group is exceedingly unusual for groups of its type
, it does not have a significant 1 kev x - ray halo .
the contribution of any hot gas in the local group igm to the soft ( 1 kev ) x - ray background is negligible .
a more important contributor might be hot gas associated with the milky way itself .
the contribution of a local group x - ray halo to the cobe quadrupole anisotropy measurement through the sunyaev - zeldovich effect is completely negligible : @xmath49k @xmath50k . since spiral - dominated groups as yet have only upper limits rather than actual detections of their igm , this upper limit on @xmath2 is quite hard unless the local group igm is very exceptional ( e.g. , comparable to that of a rich cluster of galaxies ) .
thus , the quadrupole anisotropy measured by cobe must represent the true cosmic signature .
the level at which this places the normalization of the primordial power spectrum remains an uncomfortable fact which cosmological models must fit .
bennett , c.l .
1994 , , 436 , 423 bregman , j.n . , hogg , d.e . , & roberts , m.s .
1992 , , 387 , 484 bregman , j.n . & pildis , r.a .
1994 , , 420 , 570 burrows , d.n . &
mendenhall , j.a .
1991 , , 351 , 629 elbaz , d. , arnaud , m. , & bhringer , h. 1995 , , 293 , 337 fabbiano , g. 1989 , , 27 , 87 fisher , k.b . ,
davis , m. , strauss , m.a . , yahil , a. , & huchra , j.p .
1993 , , 402 , 42 gendreau , k.c . ,
1995 , , 47 , l5 grski , k.m .
1994 , , 430 , l89 mccammon , d. & sanders , w.t .
1990 , , 28 , 657 mulchaey , j.s . ,
davis , d.s . , mushotzky , r.f . , &
burstein d. 1996 , , 456 , 80 pildis , r.a . ,
bregman , j.n . , &
evrard , a.e .
1995 , , 443 , 514 snowden , s.l . ,
mebold , u. , hirth , w. , herbstmeier , u. , & schmitt , j.h.m.m .
1991 , science , 252 , 1529 snowden , s.l . , mccammon , d. , & verter , f. 1993 , , 409 , l21 suto , y. , makishima , k. , ishisaki , y. , & ogasaka , y. 1996 , , 461 , l33 [ smio ] vogler , a. , pietsch , w. , & kahabka , p. 1996
, , 305 , 74 white , s.d.m . , navarro , j.f . ,
evrard , a.e . , & frenk , c.s .
1993 , , 366 , 429 zeldovich , ya.b . & sunyaev , r.a .
1969 , , 4 , 301 | x - ray emitting gas important gaseous content universe dominates interstellar medium elliptical galaxies accounts baryonic mass clusters 30% total gravitating mass observations led suto et al suggest local group galaxies might have substantial x - ray halo hot intragroup medium could contribute excess soft kev x - ray background measurements excess well - fit by thermal model solar metallicity temperature 0.16 kev determining contributors x - ray background crucial local group x - ray halo significant quadrupole anisotropy microwave background sunyaev - zeldovich effect quadrupole signature @xmath2 could account entirety quadrupole signal observed by cobe @xmath3k cobe measurement provides critical constraint on cosmological models power spectrum primordial density fluctuations parameterized as @xmath4 spectral index @xmath5 primary component cosmological model scale invariant value @xmath6 preferred inflationary models cobe observations provide normalization constraints on @xmath5 cobe normalization on large angular scales too high relative scales for predictions standard @xmath6 cold dark matter modelneed for more power large by cobe motivation for models with hot cold dark matter significant local contribution to @xmath8 alter cosmological models reviving standard cold dark matter important to limits on potential @xmath2 local group hot igm embedded in hot interstellar medium difficult to disentangle contribution hot igm to x - ray from other local sources local group can in context observations other groups suggestion of significant local group igm parallel to luminous intracluster media of rich clusters groups provide enlightening comparison @xmath0 pspc observations of galaxy groups varying richness obtained comparisons can made poor groups more populated dense than local group provide better comparison for x - ray properties than rich clusters @xmath0 pspc sensitivity angular resolution detailed study of diffuse x - ray emission in galaxy groups observations reveal x - ray luminous groups contain more elliptical galaxies than spirals first - ranked galaxy is elliptical few groups with spiral majority no bright ellipticals detected x - ray emission compact igm or temperature too low for pspc suto et al 150 @xmath9 1 2.3 @xmath10 hcg 12 e 45 @xmath11 0.72 7.8 hcg 62 e 60 1.1 hcg 68 e 33 0.98 10.6 hcg 97 e 8 @xmath17 0.97 43.8 @xmath18 n2300 group e s 27 0.93 13.0 hcg 2 s 33 1 10.6 hcg 10 s 33 1 10.6 hcg 44 s 33 1 10.6 hcg 79 e 33 1 10.6 hcg 93 s 33 1 10.6 @xmath30 two dozen galaxy groups detected pspc properties constrain models possible igm local group relevant quantities t temperature plasma column density @xmath31 central electron density core radius distance milky way from center local group @xmath34 assumed local group igm t=1 kev @xmath32@xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath33=150 kpc @xmath34=350 kpc table 1 lists values groups analyzed by pildis et al . 1995 ) values smio assumedcomparison retain value @xmath34 smio local group igm three groups sample pildis et al . 1995 not included table 1 not spatially resolved observations hcg 4 , 92 94 @xcite upper limits assume typical core radius 33 kpc temperature ( 1 kev ) x - ray luminous groups use calculated central density 3@xmath37 upper limit group radius observations mulchaey et al . 1996 list central densities average temperatures @xmath11 kev core radii 9 kpc to over 300 kpc median value 43 kpc excluding groups @xcite observed groups smaller values @xmath33 greater @xmath32 than smio local group igm values t similar figure 1 shows expanded version fig . 4 smio data table 1 smio s model for local group igm theoretical curves follow equation ( 9 smio @xmath38^ @xmath39 electron mass speed of light thomson scattering cross section boltzmann constant numerical fudge factor @xmath43 due to spherical harmonic multipoles adopted @xmath44 to match curve for @xmath45kdetected group hcg 97 appear on graph due to large value @xmath34/@xmath33 ngc 2300 group dominated by spirals ellipticals lowest value @xmath31 t brightest elliptical - dominated groups in pildis et al . 1995 sample fall short of @xmath46k below curve igm parameters assumed by smio suggest lg x - ray halo effect on quadrupole cmb anisotropies optimistic estimate @xmath47 maximum quadrupole anisotropy with spiral - dominated groups 0.1 @xmath48k factor 60 less than @xmath8 unless local group unusual hot igm not relevant to cobe quadrupole anisotropy measurement systematic effects characteristics igm x - ray assumed metallicity gas background level could change core radius central density by no more than factor of few likely less temperature of galaxy groups close to 1 kev average local group less populated more diffuse than average spiral - dominated group unlikely local group igm produce significant fraction cobe quadrupole anisotropyplausible source soft excess x - ray background halo milky way emission local superbubble studies 1/4 3/4 kev x - ray backgrounds origination in galaxy local group x - ray shadowing molecular clouds 3/4 kev background dominated by emission local superbubble 1/4 kev from hot halo milky way spiral galaxies similar to galaxy patchy soft x - ray haloes x - ray emission spiral - dominated groups due to component galaxies no reason expect local group igm important local x - ray background effect local group x - ray halo on local soft x - ray microwave backgrounds considered x - ray properties of poor groups galaxies sparse spiral - dominated groups like local group detected in x - rays elliptical - dominated groups have low luminosities rich clusters unless local group unusual significant 1 kev x - ray halo contribution hot gas local group igm to soft x - ray background negligible important contributor might be hot gas milky way contribution local group x - ray halo to cobe quadrupole anisotropy measurement negligiblespiral - dominated groups have upper limits detections igm upper limit on @xmath2 hard unless local group igm exceptional comparable rich cluster galaxies quadrupole anisotropy measured by cobe represent cosmic signature normalization primordial power spectrum uncomfortable cosmological models must fit bennett 1994 436 , 423 bregman hogg roberts 1992 387 , 484 bregman pildis 1994 420 , 570 burrows mendenhall j 1991 351 , 629 elbaz arnaud bhringer 1995 293 , 337 fabbiano 1989 27 , 87 fisher davis strauss yahil huchra 1993 402 , 42 gendreau 1995 47 , l5 grski 1994 430 , l89 mccammon sanders 1990 28 , 657 mulchaey davis mushotzky burstein d. 1996 456 , 80 pildis bregman j evrard ,1995 443 , 514 snowden mebold hirth herbstmeier schmitt 1991 science 252 , 1529 snowden mccammon verter f 1993 409 , l21 suto makishima ishisaki ogasaka 1996 , l33 vogler pietsch kahabka 1996 305 , 74 white s.d.m . navarro j.f evrard frenk c.s 1993 366 , 429 zeldovich sunyaev r.a 1969 4 , 301 | 0.505614 | 3,350 | 1,745 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,216 | we study the kleinberg problem of navigation in small world networks when the underlying lattice is stretched along a preferred direction .
extensive simulations confirm that maximally efficient navigation is attained when the length @xmath0 of long - range links is taken from the distribution @xmath1 , when the exponent @xmath2 is equal to @xmath3 , the dimension of the underlying lattice , regardless of the amount of anisotropy , but only in the limit of infinite lattice size , @xmath4 . for finite size lattices
we find an optimal @xmath5 that depends strongly on @xmath6 . the convergence to @xmath7 as @xmath4 shows interesting power - law dependence on the anisotropy strength . | the small - world phenomenon is one of the most intriguing properties of human society .
this describes the fact that unrelated people in a society , who are a very large geographic distance apart from one another , tend to be connected by surprisingly short chains of acquaintances .
this phenomenon was hypothesized in 1929 by hungarian author frigyes karinthy @xcite and was first observed experimentally in the 1960 s with sociologist stanley milgram s seminal experiments @xcite wherein randomly chosen people were selected to mail a letter to an unknown target person , but were only allowed to send the letter to a friend , who would pass the letter along to another friend , etc .
, until the target was reached .
successful transmissions took surprisingly few intermediate people , lending credibility to the turn of phrase ` six degrees of separation , ' popularized by karinthy . understanding this phenomenon is an important sociological problem .
to study the underlying mechanism that led to milgram s results , computer scientist jon kleinberg modeled a society as follows @xcite .
begin with a large , regular square @xmath8 lattice .
each node is connected to its nearest lattice neighbors and to a single random node a large distance away .
the probability of nodes @xmath9 and @xmath10 being connected by such a long range contact is @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the euclidian distance between the two nodes and the sum runs over all nodes in the network except @xmath9 .
physically , the local lattice connections represent associations with immediate neighbors , fellow townspeople , etc . , while long - range contacts might model friends or relatives in another city or country .
we seek to pass the message from a random starting node @xmath13 to a random target @xmath14 .
of great importance is the fact that each node has no information beyond the locations of its contacts and the target node @xmath14 , so the operational algorithm must be _ local _ in character .
kleinberg has proved that no local algorithm can do better , functionally , than the _ greedy _ algorithm @xcite : each message holder passes the message along to whichever of its contacts is closest to @xmath14 , until the message reaches the target .
moreover , for @xmath15 the delivery time @xmath16 ( number of intermediate steps ) scales as a _ power _ of @xmath6 , while small world behavior and the weakest dependence on lattice size emerges for @xmath7 , where @xmath17 .
the distribution of nodes on a regular square lattice is too rigid , failing to mimic important features of actual distributions of populations ( or computer routers , etc . ) . in an effort to account for these
we have studied kleinberg navigation in fractals @xcite , showing that the optimal long - contact exponent is then @xmath18 , the fractal dimension of the lattice . in this letter
we study the effects of anisotropy another commonly encountered distortion of the ideal kleinberg lattice .
our results indicate that in the limit of lattice size @xmath4 the optimal contact exponent for two - dimensional lattices is still @xmath7 . for finite @xmath6
, we find an optimal exponent @xmath5 quite different from the infinite limit . the convergence to @xmath7 as @xmath4 shows interesting power - law dependence on the anisotropy strength .
we wish to study the isolated effect of anisotropy on kleinberg navigation .
to do this , we begin with a regular square lattice ( @xmath19 ) and introduce one of two forms of anisotropy .
* * lattice anisotropy : * the underlying lattice is stretched horizontally , along the @xmath20-axis , by a factor @xmath21 , such that the area of each cell goes from @xmath22 to @xmath23 . * * angular anisotropy : * long - range contacts are chosen preferably along the vertical direction , by a factor @xmath21 .
more precisely , the random angle @xmath24 of each long - range contact vector ( measured counter - clockwise , from the @xmath20-axis ) is modified to @xmath25 : @xmath26 both of these types of anisotropy tend to favor connections in the vertical @xmath27-direction , if @xmath28 , and along the @xmath20-direction , if @xmath29 .
to simulate kleinberg navigation efficiently , we use several tricks and approximations .
first , rather than testing a finite - size square @xmath8 lattice , we consider an infinite lattice and place the source and target at distance @xmath6 from one another .
since the message always progresses toward the target , by the greedy algorithm , the message holder remains within a disc of radius @xmath6 centered on the target node , so in practice only a finite number of sites would be explored anyways .
second , the computation of the normalizing sum in the denominator of eq .
( [ eqn : kleinbergnavigationprob ] ) is dependent ( in finite lattices ) upon the location of the node @xmath9 , and can be very time consuming .
the infinite lattice circumvents this problem , as the normalizing constant is the same for all nodes .
note , however , that @xmath30 does not converge for @xmath31 . in that case
, we imagine a lattice larger than the @xmath6-disc of activity , with periodic boundary conditions , such that the normalizing factor is still the same for all sites . because of the monotonic progression toward the target no site
is ever revisited in the process . moreover , as observed by kleinberg @xcite , one can think of the long - contact link out of node @xmath9 as being created at the very instant that the message arrives at @xmath9 .
thus , the full lattice is unnecessary , and we need keep in memory only the current location of the message holder ( and the location of the target ) .
when the message arrives at @xmath9 , we create a random long contact , compare the distances of all five neighbors of @xmath9 ( the four lattice neighbors and the long contact ) to the target , and move the message to the site closest to the target .
the long contact is created by choosing a random distance and angle , @xmath32 . in order to reproduce the correct @xmath33 the distance @xmath0
is taken from the distribution @xmath34 , to account for the linear growth of the area of the ring where the contact might fall .
the angle @xmath24 is distributed uniformly between 0 and @xmath35 . in the case of angular anisotropy ,
@xmath24 is replaced by @xmath25 , according to ( [ eqn : anisoangledef ] ) .
finally , a vector @xmath32 is drawn from site @xmath9 and the contact is placed on the site @xmath10 closest to the vector tip .
because of the anisotropy , the angular displacement from the source to the target makes a difference .
it is sufficient to test only the two extremes of @xmath36 and @xmath37 where the target is either parallel or perpendicular to the anisotropy direction .
we note , however , that anisotropy strength @xmath38 and a target at @xmath36 is equivalent to anisotropy @xmath39 and target at @xmath37 . for this reason
, we simply set the source and target at @xmath40 and @xmath41 , respectively , throughout , and let @xmath38 vary both below and above the isotropic divide of @xmath42 .
simulations were performed for various values of @xmath38 over a large range of @xmath2 and @xmath6 , each averaged 1000 times . for each @xmath38 and @xmath6 ,
the minimum @xmath2 was computed by first fitting a fifth - order polynomial to the averaged data , then using newton s method on the polynomial s derivative .
finally @xmath43 was plotted as a function of @xmath44 for each chosen value of @xmath38 .
these are shown in fig .
[ fig : anisodata ] and indicate that @xmath45 as @xmath46 , regardless of @xmath38 . in fig .
[ fig : accuracyextrap ] we show detailed results of the extrapolation to @xmath4 . to further clarify the behavior shown in fig .
[ fig : anisodata ] , the following procedure was performed .
first fit a cubic polynomial @xmath47 , using least squares , to each @xmath38 s curve .
then , subtract that polynomial from the isotropic case , @xmath48 .
this maps @xmath42 to the horizontal axis and gives the behavior of the @xmath49 curves `` relative '' to the isotropic curve .
these are shown in fig .
[ fig : renormedcubics ] .
the different behavior for each type of anisotropy is clear : for both types of anisotropy the results for @xmath28 show dramatic differences from the isotropic case of @xmath42 ( the differences for @xmath50 and large @xmath6 are negligible ) . for lattice anisotropy ,
the @xmath28 curves start above the @xmath42 curve and cross below until they eventually converge at a similar rate , as @xmath4 . for the angular anisotropy
, the @xmath28 curves approach @xmath51 at a different rate than the @xmath42 curve , resulting in distinctly different slopes in the plots of fig .
[ fig : angleanisodata ] .
the observed `` crossover '' behavior present in the lattice anisotropy is somewhat unexpected . the crossover point , @xmath52 ,
is explored by finding the zero of each @xmath48 .
these are plotted in fig .
[ fig : logloglatticecrossover]a , and seem to indicate a power law relationship , @xmath53 .
likewise , the different slopes for angular anisotropy , plotted in fig . [ fig : logloglatticecrossover]b , show power - law behavior and seem to increase roughly as @xmath54 . what is responsible for these phenomena remains an open question .
we have shown , by extensive numerical simulations , that kleinberg navigation in two - dimensional lattices with two types of anisotropy displays the same gross characteristics as navigation in isotropic lattices .
in particular , the optimal long - contact exponent in the limit of infinitely distant source and target remains @xmath7 , even in the presence of anisotropy .
it is worthwhile to note that the actual values for the optimal exponent @xmath5 for finite @xmath6 can differ considerably from the limit @xmath7 , even for reasonably large lattices .
thus , for practical applications the optimal exponent ought to be evaluated on a case by case basis .
the modes of convergence to the limit @xmath4 show intriguing power - law dependence upon the strength of the anisotropy .
a theoretical explanation for this behavior remains the subject of future work .
we gratefully acknowledge nsf award phy0555312 for partial funding ( dba ) , and the support of a nsf graduate research fellowship ( jpb ) .
jmc has been supported as a summer research undergraduate student by the mcnair program at carkson university . | small - world phenomenon human society describes unrelated people large geographic distance connected by short chains acquaintances hypothesized 1929 by author karinthy observed experimentally 1960 s with sociologist stanley milgram s experiments randomly chosen people to mail letter to unknown target person only allowed send to friend until target reached successful transmissions took few intermediate people credibility to ` six degrees of separation by karinthy understanding important sociological problem computer scientist jon kleinberg modeled society large square @xmath8 lattice each node connected to nearest neighbors single random node large distance away probability of nodes @xmath9 and @xmath10 connected by long range contact is @xmath11 @xmath12 is euclidian distance between nodes sum runs over all nodes except local lattice connections represent associations with neighbors long - range contacts model friends or relatives in another city country pass message from random starting node @xmath13 to random target @xmath14 each node has no information beyond locations contacts and target node operational algorithm must be localkleinberg proved no local algorithm better than greedy algorithm @xcite each message holder passes message to closest to @xmath14 until reaches target @xmath15 delivery time @xmath16 scales as power @xmath6 small world behavior weakest dependence on lattice size for @xmath7 distribution nodes on regular square lattice rigid mimic features distributions populations studied kleinberg navigation in fractals @xcite optimal long - contact exponent @xmath18 fractal dimension lattice study effects anisotropy distortion kleinberg lattice results indicate limit of lattice size @xmath4 optimal contact exponent for lattices @xmath7 finite @xmath6 optimal exponent @xmath5 different from infinite limit convergence to @xmath7 @xmath4 shows power - law dependence on anisotropy strength study effect anisotropy on kleinberg navigation begin with regular square lattice @xmath19 introduce two forms of anisotropy lattice anisotropy lattice stretched horizontally-axis factor @xmath21 angular anisotropy long - range contacts chosen along vertical direction by factor @xmath21random angle @xmath24 of long - range contact vector measured counter - clockwise from @xmath20-axis modified to @xmath25 : @xmath26 anisotropy favor connections in vertical @xmath27-direction @xmath20-direction @xmath29 simulate kleinberg navigation tricks approximations finite - size square @xmath8 lattice consider infinite lattice place source and target at distance @xmath6 from message progresses toward target message holder remains within radius @xmath6 centered on target node finite number of sites explored computation of normalizing sum in denominator of eq kleinbergnavigationprob dependent upon location node @xmath9 time consuming infinite lattice circumvents problem normalizing constant same for all nodes @xmath30 converge for @xmath31 imagine lattice larger than @xmath6-disc activity with periodic boundary conditions normalizing factor same for all sites monotonic progression toward target no site revisited long - contact link out of node @xmath9 created message arrives at @xmath9 full lattice unnecessary need in memory current location of message holder and location targetmessage arrives at @xmath9 create random long contact compare distances five neighbors to move message to site closest long contact created random distance angle @xmath32 reproduce @xmath33 distance @xmath0 taken from distribution @xmath34 linear growth angle @xmath24 distributed between 0 and @xmath35 angular anisotropy @xmath24 replaced by @xmath25 vector @xmath32 drawn from site @xmath9 contact placed on site @xmath10 closest to vector tip anisotropy angular displacement from source to target difference test two extremes of @xmath36 and @xmath37 target parallel or perpendicular to anisotropy direction anisotropy strength @xmath38 target at @xmath36 equivalent to anisotropy @xmath39 @xmath37 set source target at @xmath40 and @xmath41 let @xmath38 vary below above isotropic divide of @xmath42 simulations performed for values @xmath38 @xmath2 @xmath6 averaged 1000 times minimum @xmath2 computed by fitting fifth - order polynomial to averaged data newton s method on derivative@xmath43 plotted function of @xmath44 for each value @xmath38 shown in fig . indicate @xmath45 as @xmath46 regardless @xmath38 fig . results extrapolation to @xmath4 clarify behavior procedure performed fit cubic polynomial @xmath47 to each @xmath38 s curve subtract polynomial from isotropic case @xmath48 maps @xmath42 to horizontal axis behavior @xmath49 curves relative to isotropic curve shown in fig . different behavior for each type anisotropy results for @xmath28 show dramatic differences from isotropic case @xmath42 differences @xmath50 and @xmath6 negligible lattice anisotropy @xmath28 curves start above @xmath42 curve cross below converge similar rate angular anisotropy @xmath28 curves approach @xmath51 different different slopes in plots crossover behavior in lattice anisotropy unexpected crossover point @xmath52 explored by finding zero of each @xmath48 plotted in fig . indicate power law relationship , @xmath53 slopes for angular anisotropy in fig show power - law behavior increase as @xmath54 open question kleinberg navigation in two - dimensional lattices with anisotropy displays same characteristics as isotropic lattices optimal long - contact exponent in limit distant source target remains @xmath7 even anisotropy values for optimal exponent @xmath5 @xmath6 differ from @xmath7 even for large lattices for optimal exponent evaluated case by case modes convergence to limit @xmath4 show power - law dependence strength anisotropy theoretical explanation future work acknowledge nsf award phy0555312 for partial funding support nsf graduate research fellowship supported as summer research undergraduate student by mcnair program at carkson university | 0.357819 | 2,434 | 1,248 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,218 | calculations of @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2 decay in generalized chiral perturbation theory are presented . tree level and next - to - leading corrections are involved . sensitivity to violation of the standard counting
is discussed . + marin kolesr , ji novotn + _ charles university , faculty of mathematics and physics , v holeovikch 2 , 18000 praha 8 , czech republic _ | the @xmath3 process is a rare decay , which has been recently studied by several authors in context of standard chiral perturbation theory ( s@xmath4pt ) , namely at the lowest order by knchlein , scherer and drechsel @xcite and to next - to - leading by bellucci and isidori @xcite and ametller et al . @xcite .
the experimental interest for such a process comes from the anticipation of large number of @xmath0 s to be produced at various facilities.ne about @xmath5 decays per year ] the goal of our computations is to add the result for the next - to - leading order in generalized chiral perturbation theory ( g@xmath4pt ) .
the motivation is that one of the important contributions involve the @xmath6 off - shell vertex which is very sensitive to the violation of the standard scheme and thus this decay provides a possibility of its eventual observation .
we have completed the calculations at the tree level , added 1pi one loop corrections , corrections to the @xmath6 vertex and phenomenological corrections to the resonant contribution .
these preliminary results we would like to present in this paper .
the amplitude of the process can be defined @xmath7 in the square of the amplitude summed over the polarizations @xmath8 we integrated out all of the independent lorentz invariants except the diphoton energy square @xmath9 our goal is to calculate the partial decay width @xmath10 of the @xmath0 particle as the function of the diphoton energy square @xmath11 . at the lowest order , the s@xmath4pt does not depend on any unknown free order parameters .
in contrast , there are two free parameters controlling the violation of the standard picture in the generalized scheme .
we have chosen them as @xmath12 and their ranges are @xmath13 .
we use abbreviations for @xmath14 , @xmath15 and @xmath16 .
the standard values of these parameters are @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
at the @xmath19 tree level , the amplitude has two contributions , with a pion and an eta propagator .
the first one is resonant , ` @xmath20-pole ' , the other is not , ` @xmath0-tail ' .
the standard values of the contributions to the partial decay rate and the maximum possible violation of the standard counting ( @xmath21 ) are represented in fig .
[ graph4 ] .
the pole of the resonant contribution at @xmath22 is transparent . while in the standard case it is fully dominant , in the generalized scheme the @xmath0-tail could be determining in the whole area @xmath23 .
the reason can be found in the @xmath6 vertex .
its contribution in the generalized amplitude can jump up to 16 times its standard value . the full decay width for the standard ( @xmath24 ) and generalized case ( @xmath17,@xmath25 and @xmath26,@xmath27 ) is displayed in fig .
[ graph6 ] .
it can be seen , that even in the conservative intermediate case the change is quite interesting .
there are four distinct contributions at the next - to - leading order : one loop corrections to the @xmath28-pole and the @xmath0-tail , one particle irreducible diagrams ( 1pi ) and counterterms . in the latter case we rely upon the results of @xcite .
their estimate from vector meson dominated counterterms indicates , that it causes only a slight decrease of the full decay width .
because the estimate is the same for both schemes , for our purpose of studying the differences between them we can leave it for later investigation . more important are the corrections to the @xmath0-tail diagram .
we did take into account the corrections to the @xmath6 vertex .
these involve loop corrections and counterterms with many unknown higher order parameters . as a first approximation
, we set these parameters equal to zero and estimated their effect through the remaining dependence on the renormalization scale .
the scale was moved in the range from the mass of the @xmath0 to the mass of @xmath29-meson .
we decided , similarly to @xcite , to correct the @xmath20-pole amplitude by a phenomenological parametrization of the @xmath30 vertex and fix the parameters from experimental @xmath30 data .
we made an estimate of its phase by expanding the @xmath30 one loop amplitude around the center of the dalitz plot . in the 1pi amplitude , we neglected the suppressed kaon loops .
[ graph2 ] represents the one loop corrected decay widths for the standard and the maximum violation of the standard scheme .
the dependence on the renormalization scale is used to estimate the uncertainty in the unknown higher order coupling constants .
we can see that the scale dependence is small in the standard counting and not too terrible in the generalized variant . in the case of the maximum violation of s@xmath4pt ,
the difference is big enough to not to be washed out by the uncertainty .
however , in the conservative case @xmath17,@xmath25 this is not true and the promising results from the tree level are lost .
we have analyzed the @xmath31 decay to the next - to - leading order of chiral perturbation theory in its both variants .
the tree level results are promising , the sensitivity to the change in parameters controlling the violation of the stndard @xmath4pt is considerable .
at the one loop level , we tried to estimate the uncertainty in the higher order couplings constants in the crucial @xmath6 vertex through their dependence on the renormalization scale .
although for big violation of the standard case the difference is preserved , for the more realistic conservative case the output is not satisfactory .
we would like to stress that these results are preliminary and there are several ways how to deal with the unknown order parameters .
one of them is to take into account the vector mesons , similarly to the counterterm estimate in @xcite .
other way is to treat the whole @xmath4pt expansion differently , with more caution , as developed in @xcite .
this approach , called ` resumed ' @xmath4pt could provide results similar to the tree level case even if the one loop corrections are involved . | @xmath3 process rare decay studied by authors standard chiral perturbation theory lowest order by knchlein scherer drechsel bellucci isidori ametller experimental interest from anticipation large @xmath0 s produced at facilities @xmath5 decays per year goal add result for next - leading order in generalized chiral perturbation theory important contributions @xmath6 off - shell vertex sensitive to violation standard scheme possibility eventual observation completed calculations tree level added 1pi loop corrections @xmath6 vertex phenomenological corrections to resonant contribution preliminary results present in paper amplitude process defined @xmath7 square amplitude summed over polarizations integrated independent lorentz invariants except diphoton energy square goal to calculate partial decay width of @xmath0 particle as function of diphoton energy square @xmath11 lowest order s@xmath4pt depend on unknown free order parameters two free parameters controlling violation standard picture in scheme chosen @xmath12 ranges @xmath13 abbreviations for @xmath14 @xmath16 standard values parameters are @xmath17 @xmath18@xmath19 tree level amplitude two contributions pion eta propagator first resonant @xmath20-pole ' other not @xmath0-tail ' standard values contributions partial decay rate maximum violation standard counting @xmath21 ) represented in fig . pole resonant contribution at @xmath22 transparent standard case dominant generalized scheme @xmath0-tail whole area @xmath23 reason @xmath6 vertex contribution generalized amplitude 16 times standard value full decay width for standard @xmath24 ) generalized case @xmath17@xmath25 @xmath26,@xmath27 ) displayed in fig . graph6 conservative intermediate case change interesting four distinct contributions order loop corrections @xmath28-pole @xmath0-tail particle irreducible diagrams 1pi ) counterterms latter case rely results @xcite estimate vector meson counterterms causes slight decrease full decay width estimate same both schemes differences leave later investigation important corrections to @xmath0-tail diagram corrections @xmath6 vertex involve loop corrections counterterms unknown higher order parameters set parameters equal to zero estimated effect through dependence renormalization scalescale moved from @xmath0 to @xmath29-meson decided correct @xmath20-pole amplitude by phenomenological parametrization @xmath30 vertex parameters from experimental @xmath30 data estimate phase by expanding @xmath30 loop amplitude around dalitz plot neglected suppressed kaon loops graph2 represents loop corrected decay widths for standard and maximum violation scheme dependence on renormalization scale uncertainty in unknown higher order coupling constants scale dependence small in standard counting not terrible in generalized variant maximum violation of s@xmath4pt difference big enough not washed out by uncertainty conservative case @xmath17,@xmath25 not true promising results lost analyzed @xmath31 decay to order of chiral perturbation theory in both variants tree level results promising sensitivity to change parameters violation @xmath4pt considerable loop estimate uncertainty in higher order couplings constants in @xmath6 vertex through dependence on renormalization scale for big violation standard case difference preserved conservative case output not satisfactory results preliminary ways to deal with unknown order parameters vector mesons counterterm @xcitetreat @xmath4pt expansion differently caution developed @xcite resumed @xmath4pt provide results similar tree level case one loop corrections involved | 0.261212 | 1,354 | 689 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
199,226 | a deep inerastic scattering process is discussed to study lepton flavor violation between muons and tau leptons . in supersymmetric models , the higgs boson mediated diagrams could be important for this reaction .
we find that at a muon energy ( @xmath0 ) higher than 50 gev , the predicted cross section significantly increases due to the contribution from sea @xmath1-quarks .
the number of produced tau leptons can be @xmath2 at @xmath0= 300 gev from @xmath3 muons , whereas @xmath4 events are given at @xmath5 gev . | in a model based on supersymmetry ( susy ) , slepton mixing is a source of lepton flavor violation ( lfv ) .
two types of effective lfv couplings are induced at low energies ; i.e. , those mediated by the neutral gauge bosons and those by the neutral higgs bosons .
in contrast to the gauge boson mediation , the contributions from the higgs - mediation do not decouple even if the soft susy breaking scale is as large as @xmath6 tev @xcite . to study the higgs - mediated lfv couplings the tau - associated processes are useful because they are proportional to the mass of the relevant charged leptons .
the lfv couplings associated with a tau lepton have been measured at @xmath7 factories by searches for rare tau decays , such as @xmath8 , @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 , etc . at future collider experiments ,
they are directly tested via the decays of the higgs bosons ( @xmath12 ) , @xmath13 @xcite . in this talk , we discuss a reaction at the deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) region with high - intensity and high - energy muon beams as an alternative approach of searching for the lfv couplings associated with a tau lepton . here , @xmath14 is a target nucleon , and @xmath15 represents all final state particles .
sher and turan have discussed this process in a model independent approach @xcite . instead , we here consider this process in the framework of susy @xcite .
when the scalar lfv coupling of @xmath16 is independent of the other types of couplings , its experimental constraint comes from the @xmath17 result . the total cross section of the process mediated by the scalar lfv coupling
could then be as large as 0.5 fb at muon energy ( @xmath0 ) of 50 gev .
for this case , with @xmath3 muons per year on a @xmath4 g/@xmath18 target mass , about @xmath19 of the events can be produced , or no observation of the signal would improve the limits by six orders of magnitude @xcite . dis process , assuming the effective scalar and pseudo - scalar couplings @xcite and the mssm higgs coupling constrained from the current data @xcite .
cteq6l is used for the pdf .
, width=241 ] in the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) , the higgs boson couplings are related each other . in the decoupling region ( @xmath20 gev ) , where @xmath21 and @xmath22 , the scalar coupling @xmath23 is nearly equal to the pseudo - scalar coupling @xmath24 .
therefore , both couplings are determined by the more constrained one , namely the pseudo - scalar coupling @xcite .
it is constrained by the @xmath25 decay ( @xmath26 ) @xcite . in fig .
[ fig : tot ] , the total cross sections are shown for the cases of the effective scalar and pseudo - scalar couplings as well as the susy model with the maximal value for the couplings under the current data of the rare tau decays .
the largest values of @xmath27 and @xmath28 can be realized with @xmath29 tev and the higgsino mass @xmath30 tev .
it should be noted that in such a situation , the gauge boson mediated couplings are strongly suppressed . we evaluate the cross sections of the reaction in the dis region for the higgs - mediated interaction with the maximally allowed values of the effective couplings for each quark contribution : see fig.[fig : total - cross - section - vs - emu ] .
the cross section sharply increases above @xmath31 gev .
this enhancement comes from a consequence of the @xmath1-quark contribution in addition to the @xmath32 and @xmath33-quark contributions .
the cross section is enhanced by one order of magnitude when the muon energy changes from 50 gev to 100 gev .
typically , for @xmath34 gev and @xmath35 gev , the cross section is @xmath36 fb and @xmath37 fb , respectively .
dis process as a function of the muon energy for the higgs mediated interaction .
it is assumed that the initial muons are purely left - handed .
cteq6l is used for the pdf .
, width=226 ] next , we study cases where the gauge - boson mediation is dominant ; i.e. , @xmath38 gev . since br@xmath39 @xcite , the contribution from the tensor interaction is found to be smaller than that from the higgs boson mediation by about five orders of magnitude . on the other hand ,
the vector and axial - vector interactions are suppressed at the same level as the pseudo - scalar interaction @xcite .
therefore , their contributions can be as large as those for the higgs boson mediation , if @xmath40 is less than 50 gev @xcite . at higher energies , the cross section for the gauge boson mediation becomes much smaller than that for the higgs boson mediation because of no enhancement by the @xmath1-quark sub - process .
[ fig : angle - dependence ]
with the intensity of @xmath3 muons per year and the target mass of 100 g/@xmath18 , about @xmath41 ( @xmath42 ) events could be expected for @xmath43 fb , which corresponds to @xmath44 @xmath45 gev from fig . [ fig : total - cross - section - vs - emu ] .
this would provide good potential to improve the sensitivity by four ( two ) orders of magnitude from the present limit from @xmath46 decay , respectively .
such a muon intensity could be available at a future muon collider and a neutrino factory . in the higgs boson mediated interaction ,
the tau leptons are emitted at a relatively large angle with respect to the beam direction .
this is in contrast to the gauge mediated interaction where the tau leptons are forward - peaked . in fig .
[ fig : angle - dependence ] , the @xmath47 dependence in the differential cross section is shown for each @xmath48 at @xmath0 = 50 and 100 gev . to identify the tau lepton from the reaction , direct measurement of tau lepton tracks ( such as by emulsions )
might not be possible at such a high beam rate .
instead , the identification might be possible by tagging the tau decay products and observing their decay kinematics . among various decay modes
, one might consider leptonic decays of the tau leptons .
another candidate could be to detect a hadron from the two - body tau decays .
the branching ratios , such as @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 , are about 0.3 in total . in particular , in susy models with left - handed slepton mixing , the @xmath52(@xmath53 ) produced through the higgs - mediated interaction is only right - handed ( left - handed ) for an incident left - handed @xmath54 beam ( right - handed @xmath55 beam ) .
the hadrons from the right - handed @xmath52 decay ( left - handed @xmath53 decay ) tend to be emitted in the direction of the parent tau lepton , and therefore be rather energetic .
therefore , the signature of the events could be a hard hadron at a relatively large angle from the beam direction ( namely a hadron with large transverse momentum @xmath56 ) and some missing energy .
those hadrons from the tau decay should be discriminated from the hadrons from the target nucleons which have mostly soft energies .
this process can be useful to search for the higgs - boson mediated lfv coupling , especially when @xmath40 is higher than 50 gev .
there , the contributions from the sea @xmath1-quarks become significant , and the cross section is drastically enhanced . | model supersymmetry slepton mixing lepton flavor violation lfv two effective lfv couplings induced at low energies mediated by neutral gauge bosons higgs bosons contributions higgs - mediation decouple soft susy breaking scale large @xmath6 @xcite study higgs - mediated lfv couplings tau - associated processes useful proportional to mass charged leptons lfv couplings tau lepton measured at @xmath7 factories rare tau decays future collider experiments tested via decays higgs bosons @xmath12 discuss reaction at deep inelastic scattering region with high - intensity high - energy muon beams alternative approach for lfv couplings tau lepton @xmath14 target nucleon @xmath15 final state particles discussed process model independent approach @xcite consider framework susy @xcite scalar lfv coupling of @xmath16 independent of other experimental constraint from @xmath17 result total cross section process could large 0.5 fb at muon energy @xmath0 ) of 50 gev @xmath3 muons per year @xmath4 g/@xmath18 target mass @xmath19 events produced no observation limits six orders @xcite effective scalar pseudo - scalar couplings @xcite mssm higgs coupling constrained from current data pdf minimal supersymmetric standard model higgs boson couplings related decoupling region @xmath20 gev @xmath21 @xmath22 scalar coupling @xmath23 equal to pseudo - scalar @xmath24 couplings determined by constrained pseudo - scalar coupling @xcite constrained by @xmath25 decay @xmath26 ) @xcite fig . total cross sections effective scalar pseudo - scalar couplings susy model maximal value couplings current data rare tau decays largest values @xmath27 @xmath28 with @xmath29 tev higgsino mass @xmath30 tev gauge boson mediated couplings suppressed evaluate cross sections reaction dis region higgs - mediated interaction maximally allowed values effective couplings each quark contribution fig cross section increases above @xmath31 gev enhancement @xmath1-quark contribution @xmath32 @xmath33-quark contributionscross section enhanced when muon energy changes from 50 to 100 gev @xmath34 @xmath35 gev cross section is @xmath36 fb @xmath37 fb muon energy higgs interaction initial muons left - handed cteq6l used for pdf study gauge - boson mediation dominant @xmath38 gev@xmath39 contribution tensor interaction smaller higgs boson mediation five orders vector axial - vector interactions suppressed as pseudo - scalar interaction contributions large as higgs boson mediation if @xmath40 less than 50 gev @xcite higher energies cross section gauge boson mediation smaller higgs no enhancement @xmath1-quark sub - process angle - intensity of @xmath3 muons per year target mass 100 g/@xmath18 @xmath41 ( @xmath42 ) events expected for @xmath43 fb corresponds to @xmath44 @xmath45 gev total cross section vs potential improve sensitivity by four orders from @xmath46 decay muon intensity at future muon collider neutrino factoryhiggs boson interaction tau leptons emitted large angle beam direction contrast to gauge mediated interaction forward - peaked fig . angle dependence @xmath47 dependence differential cross section shown for each @xmath48 at @xmath0 = 50 and 100 gev identify tau lepton direct measurement possible high beam rate identification tagging tau decay products observing decay kinematics consider leptonic decays tau leptons detect hadron from two - body tau decays branching ratios @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 about 0.3 total susy models left - handed slepton mixing @xmath52(@xmath53 ) produced higgs interaction right - handed for @xmath54 beam @xmath55 beam hadrons from right - handed @xmath52 decay @xmath53 emitted direction parent tau lepton rather energetic signature could be hard hadron at large angle from beam direction large transverse momentum @xmath56 missing energy hadrons from tau decay from target nucleons soft energies process useful search for higgs - boson mediated lfv coupling especially when @xmath40 higher than 50 gev contributions from sea @xmath1-quarks significant cross section enhanced | 0.306841 | 1,741 | 898 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,231 | we have measured polarized raman scattering spectra of the fe@xmath0co@xmath1sb@xmath2 and fe@xmath0cr@xmath1sb@xmath2 ( 0@xmath30.5 ) single crystals in the temperature range between 15 k and 300 k. the highest energy @xmath4 symmetry mode shows significant line asymmetry due to phonon mode coupling width electronic background .
the coupling constant achieves the highest value at about 40 k and after that it remains temperature independent .
origin of additional mode broadening is pure anharmonic .
below 40 k the coupling is drastically reduced , in agreement with transport properties measurements .
alloying of fesb@xmath5 with co and cr produces the b@xmath6 mode narrowing , i.e. weakening of the electron - phonon interaction . in the case of a@xmath7 symmetry modes
we have found a significant mode mixing . | fesb@xmath2 is a narrow - gap semiconductor which attracted a lot of attention because of its unusual magnetic,@xcite thermoelectric@xcite and transport properties.@xcite the magnetic susceptibility of fesb@xmath2 is nearly constant at low temperatures with paramagnetic to diamagnetic crossover at around 100 k for a field applied along the @xmath8-axis , similar to fesi.@xcite the electrical resistivity along the @xmath9- and @xmath10 - axes shows semiconducting behavior with rapid increase for t @xmath11 100 k. along the @xmath8 -axis resistivity exhibits a metal to semiconductor transition at around 40 k.@xcite based on the measurements of the electrical resistivity , magnetic susceptibility , thermal expansion , heat capacity and optical conductivity the fesb@xmath2 has been characterized as a strongly correlated semiconductor.@xcite it was also shown that fesb@xmath2 has colossal seebeck coefficient @xmath12 at 10 k and the largest power factor @xmath13 ever reported.@xcite thermal conductivity @xmath14 of fesb@xmath2 is relatively high and is dominated by phonons around 10 k with phonon mean free path @xmath15 m several orders of magnitude larger than electronic mean free path.@xcite in the recent room temperature study we have observed , for the first time , all six raman active modes of fesb@xmath2 predicted by theory.@xcite racu _
et al_.@xcite measured polarized raman scattering spectra of fesb@xmath16 single crystals below room temperature and found only anharmonicity of a@xmath7 and b@xmath6 symmetry modes with no additional electron - phonon coupling . in this work
we have measured at different temperatures polarized raman scattering spectra of pure fesb@xmath2 single crystals and fesb@xmath2 crystals alloyed with co and cr . the b@xmath6 mode asymmetry and
broadening is analyzed using breit - wigner - fano profile model .
the coupling between single phonon and the electronic background is drastically reduced for temperatures bellow 40 k , fully in agreement with transport properties measurements.@xcite alloying of fesb@xmath2 with co and cr also reduces the coupling , i.e. leads to the b@xmath6 mode narrowing .
we have also observed strong a@xmath7 symmetry mode mixing .
single crystals of fesb@xmath2 , fe@xmath0co@xmath1sb@xmath2 and fe@xmath0cr@xmath1sb@xmath2 ( 0@xmath170.5 ) were grown using the high - temperature flux method , which is described in details in refs.@xcite sample structure and composition were determined by analyzing the powder x - ray diffraction data of fe(co , cr)sb@xmath2 single crystals collected using a rigaku miniflex diffractometer with cu k@xmath18 radiation.@xcite the samples stoichiometry was determined by an energy dispersive jeol jsm-6500 sem microprobe .
analysis of several nominal x=0.25 samples showed that the uncertainty in co and cr concentrations among samples grown from different batches was @xmath19x=0.04 .
the raman scattering measurements were performed using jobin yvon t64000 raman system in micro - raman configuration .
the 514.5 nm line of an ar@xmath20/kr@xmath20 mixed gas laser was used as an excitation source .
focusing of the laser beam was realized with a long distance microscope objective ( magnification @xmath21 ) .
we have found that laser power level of 0.02 mw on the sample is sufficient to obtain raman signal and , except signal to noise ratio , no changes of the spectra were observed as a consequence of laser heating by further lowering laser power . the corresponding excitation power density was less then 0.1 kw/@xmath22 .
all raman scattering measurements presented in this work were performed using the ( 10@xmath23 ) plane of fesb@xmath2 orthorhombic crystal structure .
low temperature measurements were performed between 15 k and 300 k using konti cryovac continuous helium flow cryostat with 0.5 mm thick window .
fesb@xmath2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic marcasite - type structure of the centrosymetric pnnm ( d@xmath24 ) space group , with two formula units ( z=2 ) per unit cell.@xcite basic structural unit is built up of fe ion surrounded by deformed sb octahedra .
these structural units form edge sharing chains along the @xmath8- axis . according to the factor - group analysis
there are 6 raman active modes ( 2a@xmath7 + 2b@xmath6+b@xmath25+b@xmath26 ) , which were observed and assigned in our previous work.@xcite the a@xmath7 and b@xmath6 symmetry modes are bond stretching vibrations , whereas the b@xmath25 and b@xmath26 symmetry modes represent librational ones.@xcite single crystals in the ( x@xmath27y ) configuration ( b@xmath6 symmetry modes ) measured at different temperatures.,scaledwidth=30.0% ] fig .
[ fig2 ] shows raman scattering spectra of fesb@xmath2 single crystals in the ( x@xmath28y ) configuration ( @xmath29 $ ] , @xmath30$])@xcite measured at different temperatures in the spectral range of the highest energy b@xmath6 symmetry mode . for this configuration b@xmath6 and b@xmath26 modes
are raman active , see ref .
one can notice an asymmetry of the b@xmath6 mode towards lower wave numbers .
this broad , asymmetric structure is analyzed using a breit - wigner - fano ( bwf ) interference model.@xcite the resonance usually involves an interference between raman scattering from continuum excitations and that from a discrete phonon , provided two raman - active excitations are coupled .
the bwf model line shape is given by : @xmath31 where @xmath32 and @xmath33 is the degree of coupling which describes the departure of the lineshape from a symmetric lorentzian function .
the @xmath34 is the intensity and @xmath35 and @xmath36 are the real and imaginary part of phonon self energy , respectively .
the spectra calculated using eq .
( @xmath37 ) are shown as solid lines in fig .
[ fig2 ] .
.parameters obtained by fitting of the b@xmath6 symmetry mode spectra of pure fesb@xmath5 with the bwf line shape model . [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] from the bwf analysis of the experimental data for fe@xmath0(co , cr)@xmath38sb@xmath5 ( solid lines at the right panel of fig [ 4 ] ) , one can see a large increase of the @xmath39 with an increase of @xmath40 , indicating a decrease of electron - phonon interaction by co and cr alloying .
temperature dependance of energy and linewidth for fe@xmath0(co , cr)@xmath38sb@xmath5 alloys are shown in the left panel of fig .
experimental data are represented by symbols .
calculated spectra , obtained using eqs .
( [ 10 ] ) and ( [ 4 ] ) , are represented by dashed and solid lines .
best fit parameters are presented in table [ tab.2 ] .
@xmath41 decreases significantly in fe@xmath0(co , cr)@xmath38sb@xmath5 alloys compared to the pure fesb@xmath5 ( table [ tab.2 ] ) , although crystal disorder increases with increasing co and cr concentration ( for @xmath42 ) .
this is a consequence of drastic decrease of electron - phonon interaction contribution with increasing @xmath40 .
one can also notice that values of anharmonic constants decrease with increasing co and cr concentrations , what can be a consequence of change of electronic structure of material by alloying .
( left panel ) and fe@xmath43cr@xmath44sb@xmath5 ( right panel ) single crystals in the ( x@xmath27x@xmath27 ) configuration ( a@xmath7 symmetry modes ) measured at different temperatures.,scaledwidth=40.0% ] the polarized raman scattering spectra for pure fesb@xmath2 and fe@xmath43cr@xmath45sb@xmath2 single crystals in the ( x@xmath28x@xmath28 ) configuration ( a@xmath46 symmetry modes ) measured at different temperatures , are presented in fig . [ fig5 ] .
we have observed structure at about 155 @xmath47 which shows asymmetry towards higher wavenumbers .
however , this asymmetry can not be ascribed to the electron - phonon interaction , but is a consequence of the existence of two a@xmath46 symmetry modes , as we have already reported in our previously published paper.@xcite low temperature measurement confirmed our previous assignation .
the lorentzian lineshape profile has been used for extraction of mode energy and linewidth .
these modes have nearly the same energies what imposes the existence of the mode mixing , manifested by energy and intensity exchange .
the mixing is specially pronounced when the intensities of the modes are nearly the same.@xcite for fesb@xmath2 the mixing is strongest in the temperature range between 200 k and 250 k and for fe@xmath43cr@xmath44sb@xmath2 between 120 k and 180 k , see fig .
the temperature study of polarized raman scattering spectra of the fe@xmath0m@xmath38 sb@xmath5 ( m = cr , co ) single crystals has been performed . the linewidths and energies of the raman modes
were analyzed as a function of @xmath40 and temperature .
strong electron - phonon interaction , observed for the b@xmath6 symmetry mode of pure fesb@xmath5 , produces significant mode asymmetry .
the coupling constant reaches highest value at about 40 k and after that remains temperature independent .
additional broadening comes from the temperature induced anharmonicity . with increasing concentration of co and cr in fe@xmath0(co , cr)@xmath38sb@xmath5 alloys
the electron - phonon interaction is drastically reduced .
we have also observed mixing of the @xmath48 symmetry phonon modes in pure and cr doped sample .
we have pleasure to thank dr zorani dohevi - mitrovi for helpful discussion .
this work was supported by the serbian ministry of science and technological development under project no .
part of this work was carried out at the brookhaven national laboratory which is operated for the office of basic energy sciences , u.s .
department of energy by brookhaven science associates ( de - ac02 - 98ch10886 ) .
e. kroumova , m. i. aroyo , j. m. perez mato , a. kirov , c. capillas , s. ivantchev and h. wondratschek .
`` bilbao crystallographic server : useful databases and tools for phase transitions studies '' .
phase transitions * 76 * , nos . 1 - 2 , 155 - 170 ( 2003 ) . | fesb@xmath2 narrow - gap semiconductor attracted attention unusual magnetic thermoelectric transport properties magnetic susceptibility constant at low temperatures paramagnetic to diamagnetic crossover 100 k electrical resistivity - axes semiconducting behavior rapid increase for 100 k -axis metal to semiconductor transition 40 k electrical resistivity magnetic thermal expansion heat capacity optical conductivity strongly correlated semiconductor colossal seebeck coefficient at 10 k largest power factor @xmath13 thermal conductivity high dominated by phonons around 10 k phonon mean free path m larger than electronic mean free path room temperature study observed all six raman active modes of@xmath2 measured polarized raman scattering spectra of crystals below room temperature found anharmonicity of a@xmath7 b@xmath6 symmetry modes no additional electron - phonon coupling measured different temperatures polarized raman scattering spectra of pure@xmath2 crystals alloyed with co crb@xmath6 mode asymmetry broadening analyzed using breit - wigner - fano profile model coupling between single phonon electronic background reduced for temperatures bellow 40 k with transport properties measurements alloying fesb@xmath2 with co cr reduces coupling leads to mode narrowing observed strong a@xmath7 symmetry mode mixing single crystals of fesb@xmath2 fe@xmath0co grown high - temperature flux method sample structure composition determined powder x - ray diffraction data rigaku miniflex diffractometer radiation samples stoichiometry determined by energy dispersive jeol jsm-6500 sem microprobe uncertainty in co cr concentrations among.04 raman scattering measurements jobin yvon t64000 raman system 514.5 nm line ar@xmath20/kr@xmath20 mixed gas laser excitation source focusing laser long distance microscope objective laser power 0.02 mw sufficient raman signal no changes spectra observed laser heating excitation power density less then 0.1 kw/@xmath22 raman scattering measurements 10@xmath23 ) plane fesb@xmath2 orthorhombic crystal structure low temperature measurements between 15 k 300 k konti cryovac continuous helium flow cryostat 0.5 mm window fesb@xmath2 crystallizes orthorhombic marcasite structure centrosymetric pnnm d@xmath24 ) space group two formula units z=2 per cell@xcite structural unit fe ion deformed sb octahedra form edge chains @xmath8- axis 6 raman active modes 2a@xmath7@xmath6 observed previous work a@xmath7 b@xmath6 modes bond stretching vibrations librational crystals x@xmath27y ) configuration measured different temperatures raman scattering spectra fesb@xmath2 crystals x@xmath28y ) configuration different temperatures highest energy b@xmath6 symmetry mode b@xmath6 modes raman active asymmetry b@xmath6 mode towards lower wave numbers asymmetric structure analyzed breit - wigner - fano interference modelresonance interference between raman from continuum excitations discrete phonon two raman - active excitations coupled bwf model line shape given by @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 degree coupling departure lineshape from symmetric lorentzian function @xmath34 intensity @xmath35 real imaginary phonon self energy spectra calculated using eq @xmath37 as solid lines in fig obtained fitting b@xmath6 symmetry mode spectra pure fesb@xmath5 with bwf line shape model analysis experimental data for@xmath0@xmath5 increase @xmath39 increase @xmath40 decrease electron - phonon interaction by co cr alloying temperature dependance of energy linewidth for alloys shown in left panel fig experimental data represented by symbols calculated spectra eqs 4 represented by dashed solid lines best fit parameters in table [ tab.2 @xmath41 decreases in@xmath5 alloys compared to pure fesb@xmath5 crystal disorder increases with increasing co cr concentration @xmath42consequence decrease electron - phonon interaction increasing @xmath40 anharmonic constants decrease increasing co cr concentrations consequence change electronic structure alloying left fe@xmath43cr@xmath44sb@xmath5 single crystals x@xmath27x configuration@xmath7 symmetry modes measured different temperatures polarized raman scattering spectra fesb@xmath2 fe@xmath43cr@xmath45sb@xmath2 crystals x@xmath28x configuration a@xmath46 symmetry modes different temperatures presented fig . observed structure 155 @xmath47 asymmetry higher wavenumbers asymmetry electron - phonon interaction consequence two a@xmath46 symmetry modes low temperature measurement confirmed assignation lorentzian lineshape profile used extraction mode energy linewidth modes same energies mode mixing energy intensity exchange intensities same fesb@xmath2 mixing strongest 200 k and 250 k fe@xmath43cr@xmath44sb@xmath2 120 k and 180 k fig temperature study polarized raman scattering spectra fe@xmath0m@xmath38 sb@xmath5 cr co single crystals performedlinewidths energies raman modes analyzed @xmath40 temperature strong electron - phonon interaction b@xmath6 symmetry mode@xmath5 produces mode asymmetry coupling constant 40 k remains temperature independent broadening temperature anharmonicity increasing concentration co cr in@xmath0@xmath38sb@xmath5 alloys electron - phonon interaction reduced observed mixing @xmath48 symmetry phonon modes pure cr doped sample dr zorani dohevi - mitrovi discussion work supported serbian ministry science technological development project no . work brookhaven national laboratory office basic energy sciences department energy brookhaven science associates kroumova aroyo ivantchev wondratschek bilbao crystallographic server databases tools phase transitions studies phase transitions * 76 1 - 2 155 - 170 ( 2003 ) | 0.353394 | 2,509 | 1,255 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
199,233 | we employ quantum mechanical principles in the computability exploration of the class of classically noncomputable hilbert s tenth problem which is equivalent to the turing halting problem in computer science .
the quantum adiabatic theorem enables us to establish a connection between the solution for this class of problems and the asymptotic behaviour of solutions of a particular type of time - dependent schrdinger equations .
we then present some preliminary numerical simulation results for the quantum adiabatic processes corresponding to various diophantine equations . | one of the well - known and fascinating mathematical problems is about the existence of integer solutions of polynomial equations of the type @xmath0 according to fermat s last theorem , which has only been proved very recently , the above equation does not have any integer solution for @xmath1 , @xmath2 , and @xmath3 . however , although it took hundreds of years for mathematicians to finally come up with such a proof , this proof may not be valid for similar equations such as @xmath4 many important mathematical problems , such as goldbach s conjecture or the distribution of zeroes of riemann zeta function , can be cast into equivalent problems of whether related polynomial equations with integer coefficients have integer solutions or not . because of this , david hilbert in his famous list of mathematical problems in 1900 included as the tenth problem @xcite the challenge : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ given any polynomial equation with any number of unknowns and with integer coefficients : to devise a universal process according to which it can be determined by a finite number of operations whether the equation has integer solutions . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ such equations are known as diophantine equations .
never was it anticipated that this tenth problem is ultimately equivalent ( as shown by davis , putnam , robinson and matiyasevich , see @xcite ) to the halting problem of turing machines of more than 30 years later . on this equivalence basis
it has been concluded that hilbert s tenth is not computable : there is no _ single _ universal process to determine the existence of integer solution or lack of it for arbitrarily given diophantine equations in as far as there is no _ single _ universal machine to determine the halting or not of arbitrarily given turing machine ( which starts with some arbitrarily given input ) .
thus , we would have to consider anew each different case of diophantine equation . in spite of this widely accepted result
, we have proposed a _ quantum algorithm _
@xcite for solving hilbert s tenth problem . in the next section we briefly summarise the algorithm .
we then next present some preliminary numerical results from the simulations of quantum processes for some very simple diophantine equations as a concrete proof of concept " .
it suffices to consider only nonnegative solutions of a diophantine equation .
let us consider the example @xmath5 with unknowns @xmath1 , @xmath2 , and @xmath3 .
starting from the observation that if we can construct the hamiltonian @xmath6 which has a spectrum bounded from below in fact , and if we can obtain the corresponding ground state ( of least energy ) then we can solve the tenth problem !
the ground state @xmath7 of the hamiltonian so constructed has the properties , for some @xmath8 , @xmath9 thus a projective measurement of the energy @xmath10 of the ground state @xmath7 will yield the answer for the decision problem : _ * _ the corresponding diophantine equation has at least one integer solution if and only if @xmath11 , and has not otherwise .
_ * _ ( if @xmath12 in our example , we know that @xmath13 from the fermat s last theorem . ) from the above observation , our ground - state oracle is thus clear : 1 . given a diophantine equation with @xmath14 unknowns @xmath1 s @xmath15 we need to simulate on some appropriate fock space the quantum hamiltonian @xmath16 2 .
measurement results of appropriate observables in the ground state will provide the answer for our decision problem .
one way , which is by no mean the only way , to obtain the ground state is guaranteed by the quantum adiabatic theorem @xcite which we will exploit in the next section . in the adiabatic approach @xcite ,
one starts with a hamiltonian @xmath17 whose ground state @xmath18 is readily achievable .
then one forms a slowly " varying hamiltonian which interpolates between @xmath17 and @xmath19 in the time interval @xmath20 $ ] @xmath21 we will adopt this approach with the proposed ( universal ) initial hamiltonian @xmath22 which admits as the ground state the coherence state @xmath23 where @xmath24 provided the conditions of the adiabatic theorem @xcite are observed , the initial ground state will evolve into our desirable ground state @xmath7 up to a phase : @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the time - ordering operator .
so our problem now is to solve the time - dependent schrdinger equation for @xmath27 $ ] @xmath28,\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the initial state being the coherence state ( [ cohstate ] ) .
we can analytically show in general the two crucial results below @xcite : * the ground state of @xmath29 is non - degenerate for @xmath30 . as the minimum energy gap between the ground state and the first excited state is non - zero
, it takes only a finite time @xmath31 for the adiabatic process , as asserted by the quantum adiabatic theorem , to generate a state which has a high probability of being the ground state of @xmath19 . * the probability of the state at time @xmath31 in some number state , @xmath32 , is greater than 1/2 _ iff _
@xmath33 is the ground state of @xmath19 .
that is , we only need to solve the equation for increasing @xmath31 until this majority condition is satisfied in order to _ identify _ the ground state .
the proofs of these important results will be available elsewhere .
* we solve the schrdinger equation numerically in some finitely truncated fock space large enough to approximate the initial coherence state to an arbitrarily given accuracy .
that is , a truncation @xmath34 is chosen such that @xmath35 has a norm less than one by some chosen @xmath36 , @xmath37 .
* at each time step @xmath38 , and up to @xmath39 , @xmath40 thus there are maximally only two creation operators , @xmath41 , and we can explore this fact to _ explore the infinite fock space _ by increasing the size of the truncated fock space by two at every time step .
* we employ the unitary solver , with conjugate gradient method , @xmath42 which approximates @xmath43 to second order in @xmath38 .
this solver , being unitary , preserves the norm of the state vector in the evolution of time even though the size of the underlying truncated fock space is allowed to increase with time if necessary . *
the time step @xmath38 at time @xmath44 is a function of time and is chosen in such a way that halving this @xmath45 only results in @xmath39 correction .
this is an equation resulted from the factoring of the number 15 into two prime factors . because of the nature of the problem we can fix the truncated size of our fock space to be @xmath47 in order to have the norm of the state vector less than unity by an amount @xmath48 at all times . in this and in all other simulations below
we choose @xmath49 . in fig .
[ fig1 ] we plot the magnitude square of maximum component ( in terms of the fock states ) of the state vector as a function of the total evolution time @xmath31 in some arbitrary unit . closed to below @xmath50 , the maximum probability components of @xmath51 are dominant by some states , denoted by ( blue ) star and ( green ) triangle symbols , none of which are the ground state .
in fact , they are , respectively , the _ first _ degenerate excited states @xmath52 and @xmath53 of @xmath19 . corresponding equation @xmath46 ; with intermediate evolution time @xmath31 . ] with the increase in @xmath31 in fig .
[ fig2 ] , one of the fock state , @xmath54 denoted by ( red ) box symbol , has probability greater than @xmath55 which is our criterion for being identified as the ground state .
we mark this regime as the quantum adiabatic regime when the ground state wins the battle for dominance . corresponding equation @xmath46 ; with @xmath31 entering the quantum adiabatic regime . ] from the ground state so identified we can infer that our diophantine equation has one solution in this domain .
we consider this extremely simple equation as an example which has no solution in the positive integers .
the simulation parameters are as in the previous , except that the truncated size of our fock space , starting with size 8 , is now allowed to vary with time in order to simulate the exploration of the whole infinite space . in fig .
[ fig3 ] we plot the probabilities of the dominant components as a function of @xmath31 .
below @xmath57 none of the two components is greater than one - half , and in fact the first excited state , @xmath58 denoted by ( blue ) triangle symbol , clearly dominates in this regime . eventually we enter the quantum adiabatic regime upon when the ( red ) box symbol rises over the one - half mark ; indeed it corresponds to the fock state @xmath59 which is the true ground state and which implies that our original diophantine equation has no integer solution at all .
corresponding equation @xmath60 . ]
we now consider a simple example which nevertheless has all the interesting ingredients typical for a general simulation of our quantum algorithm . here
we choose @xmath62 and the initial fock space has only up to @xmath63 , which does not include the true ground state of @xmath19 .
this is typical in our simulations since we in general would not be able to tell in advance whether our initial fock spaces do contain the true ground states or not .
generally , they do not .
even so , our strategy of allowing the expansion in the size of truncated fock space in time has enabled the true ground state to be found and identified . in this example , the state @xmath64 , _ which is not included in the initial truncated fock space _ ,
is eventually reached and identified as the ground state as shown as red boxes in fig .
blue triangles and green stars are corresponding to the first two excited states @xmath65 and @xmath66 , which are degenerate eigenstates of @xmath19 .
note that these competing pretenders somehow have unexpectedly probabilities greater than one - half ( around @xmath67 ) , contrary to our analytical result that only the ground state can have probability rising above one - half !
we think that this is only some artefact of finite - size time steps @xmath38 , and expect that it would go away once we employ a more sophisticated method for solving the schrdinger equation .
work is in progress to systematically extrapolate to zero - size time steps to confirm the removal of this type of finite - size effects . corresponding equation @xmath68 .
] figs .
[ fig5 ] and [ fig6 ] depict the expectation values of occupation number and of energy as functions of @xmath31 .
they are , respectively , approaching 20 and zero ( which signify the fact that our equation has an integer solution , namely 20 ) . the expectation value of occupation number , @xmath69 , as a function of @xmath31 .
] the expectation value of energy , @xmath70 , as a function of @xmath31 . ]
we here consider the issue of computability in principle , not that of computational complexity .
the simulation results support the idea of implementation and execution of our quantum algorithm with a _ physical _ process @xcite : * run the physical process ( corresponding to the diophantine equation in consideration ) for some time @xmath31 .
* repeat the process at this @xmath31 to obtain the statistics through measurements . *
if none of the measurement outcomes exhibits probability of more than 1/2 , ram up the @xmath31 and go back to the step above .
* eventually , at some sufficiently large @xmath31 , the measurement state with more - than - even probability can thus be identified as the ground state , terminating our physical implementation and execution . *
substituting the quantum numbers for the now identified ground state enables us to see if @xmath71 and thus whether the diophantine equation has a solution .
i would like to thank cristian calude , bryan dalton , peter hannaford , alan head , toby ord and andrew rawlinson for discussions and support .
i am also grateful to mathew bailes for the extensive use of swinburne supercluster facility to produce the numerical results reported herein , and to barbara mckinnon for discussions on the finer points of fortran90
. 99 y. matiyasevich , _
hilbert s tenth problem _ , mit press , 1993 .
tien d. kieu , computing the non - computable , " _ contemporary physics _ * 44 * , 51 - 71 , 2003 ; quantum algorithm for the hilbert s tenth problem , " e - print archive quant - ph/0110136v2 and references therein , 2001 ; gdel s incompleteness , chaitin s @xmath72 number and quantum physics , " e - print archive quant - ph/0111062v2 and references therein , 2001 ; a reformulation of the hilbert s tenth problem , " e - print archive quant - ph/0111063v1 and references therein , 2001 .
tien d. kieu , in preparation .
a. messiah , _ quantum mechanics _ , wiley & sons , 1958 .
e. farhi , j. goldstone , s. gutmann and m. sipser , quantum computation by adiabatic evolution , quant - ph/0001106 , 2000 . | mathematical integer solutions polynomial equations @xmath0 according fermat s last theorem proved recently equation integer solution for @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 took hundreds of years proof may not valid for similar equations @xmath4 important problems goldbach s conjecture distribution of zeroes riemann zeta function can cast into equivalent problems related polynomial equations with integer coefficients integer solutions, david hilbert in his famous list of mathematical problems in 1900 included tenth problem @xcite the challenge : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ given any polynomial equation with any number of unknowns with integer coefficients : to devise universal process be determined by finite number of operations whether equation has integer solutions ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ such equations are known as diophantine equations . this tenth problem is equivalent ( shown by davis putnam robinson matiyasevich ) to halting problem of turing machines of more than 30 years later . equivalence basis concluded hilbert s tenth is not computable : no _ single _ universal process to determine integer solution or lack for arbitrarily given diophantine equations in no _ single universal machine to determine halting of arbitrarily given turing machine ( input ) . to consider anew each different case of diophantine equation . proposed a _ quantum algorithm _ @xcite for solving hilbert s tenth problem . in next section we summarise the algorithm . present preliminary numerical results from simulations of quantum processes for simple diophantine equations as proof of conceptconsider nonnegative solutions diophantine equation consider example @xmath5 with unknowns @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 construct hamiltonian @xmath6 spectrum bounded below obtain ground state least energy solve tenth problem ground state @xmath7 hamiltonian constructed has properties @xmath8 @xmath9 projective measurement energy @xmath10 ground state @xmath7 answer decision problem diophantine equation has one integer solution if @xmath11 not otherwise if @xmath12 example know @xmath13 from fermat s last theorem ground - state oracle clear diophantine equation with @xmath14 unknowns @xmath1 s @xmath15 simulate quantum hamiltonian @xmath16 measurement results of observables ground state provide answer decision problem obtain ground state guaranteed by quantum adiabatic theorem @xcite next section adiabatic approach @xcite starts with hamiltonian @xmath17 ground state @xmath18 achievableforms varying hamiltonian interpolates between @xmath17 @xmath19 time interval @xmath20 @xmath21 adopt approach with proposed initial hamiltonian @xmath22 admits ground state coherence state @xmath23 @xmath24 conditions adiabatic theorem observed initial ground state into desirable ground state @xmath7 @xmath25 @xmath26 time - ordering operator problem solve time - dependent schrdinger equation for @xmath27 @xmath28 initial state coherence state two results ground state of @xmath29 non - degenerate for @xmath30 minimum energy gap between ground state first excited state non - zero finite time adiabatic process generate state high probability ground state @xmath19 probability state time @xmath31 @xmath32 greater than 1/2 @xmath33 is ground state of @xmath19 solve equation for increasing @xmath31 until majority condition satisfied identify ground state proofs solve schrdinger equation numerically in truncated fock space approximate initial coherence state arbitrarily given accuracy truncation @xmath34 chosen @xmath35 norm less than one @xmath36 @xmath37each time step @xmath38 @xmath39 two creation operators, @xmath41 explore infinite fock space increasing size truncated fock space by two every employ unitary solver conjugate gradient method @xmath42 approximates @xmath43 to second order in @xmath38 preserves norm state vector evolution time size truncated fock space increase with time time step @xmath38 @xmath44 function of time halving @xmath45 results in @xmath39 correction equation from factoring number 15 into two prime factors fix truncated size fock space @xmath47 norm state vector less than unity by @xmath48 all choose @xmath49 fig plot magnitude square of maximum component fock states state vector function of total evolution time @xmath31 below @xmath50 maximum probability components of @xmath51 dominant by some states blue ) star green ) triangle symbols ground state first _ degenerate excited states @xmath52 and @xmath53 of @xmath19 corresponding equation @xmath46 intermediate evolution time @xmath31 increase in @xmath31 fig fig2 ] fock state @xmath54 red ) box symbol probability greater than @xmath55 criterion for ground state mark regime quantum adiabatic regime when ground state wins dominance equation @xmath46 @xmath31 entering quantum adiabatic regime ground state diophantine equation has one solution simple equation no solution in positive integers simulation parameters truncated size of fock space size 8 vary with time simulate exploration infinite space fig fig3 probabilities of dominant components function of @xmath31 below @xmath57 none components greater than one - half first excited state @xmath58 blue ) triangle symbol dominates enter quantum adiabatic regime when ( red ) box symbol rises over one - half mark corresponds to fock state @xmath59 true ground state original diophantine equation no integer solution corresponding equation @xmath60 simple example interesting ingredients for simulation quantum algorithm choose @xmath62 initial fock space up to @xmath63 include true ground state of @xmath19 typical in simulations initial fock spaces contain true ground statesstrategy expansion truncated fock space enabled true ground state found identified state @xmath64 not included in initial fock space reached identified as ground state red boxes in fig . blue triangles green stars first two states @xmath65 @xmath66 degenerate eigenstates of @xmath19 competing pretenders have probabilities greater than one - half around @xmath67 ) contrary to result ground state above one - half artefact of finite - size time steps @xmath38 expect go away sophisticated method solving schrdinger equation work progress to extrapolate to zero - size time steps confirm removal finite - size effects corresponding equation @xmath68 figs fig5 fig6 expectation values of occupation number energy functions of @xmath31 approaching 20 and zero equation has integer solution 20 expectation value occupation number @xmath69 function of @xmath31 energy @xmath70 function of @xmath31 consider issue of computability in principle not computational complexity simulation results support implementation quantum algorithm with physical process run physical process repeat process to obtain statistics through measurementsif none measurement more than 1/2 ram @xmath31 step large @xmath31 measurement state with more - than - even probability identified as ground state terminating physical implementation substituting quantum numbers for ground state enables if @xmath71 diophantine equation solution cristian calude bryan dalton peter hannaford alan head toby ord andrew rawlinson grateful to mathew bailes swinburne supercluster facility barbara mckinnon discussions matiyasevich hilbert s tenth problem mit press 1993 tien d. kieu computing non - computable contemporary 51 - 71 2003 quantum algorithm for hilbert s tenth problem - ph/0110136v2 2001 gdel s incompleteness chaitin s @xmath72 number quantum physics reformulation of hilbert s tenth problem tien d. kieu preparation a. messiah quantum mechanics wiley & sons 1958 e. farhi j. goldstone s. gutmann m. sipser quantum computation by adiabatic evolution quant - ph/0001106 2000 | 0.56835 | 3,474 | 1,785 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.