sample_number int64 8 203k | abstract stringlengths 21 17.4k | article stringlengths 0 18.9k | compressed_article stringlengths 0 10.9k | compression_time float64 0 0.78 | original_tokens int64 0 3.79k | compressed_tokens int64 0 2.29k | token_saving stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
197,818 | a serious concern in the safety and economy of a pressurized water nuclear reactor is related to the accumulation of boron inside the metal oxide ( mostly nife@xmath0o@xmath1 spinel ) deposits on the upper regions of the fuel rods .
boron , being a potent neutron absorber , can alter the neutron flux causing anomalous shifts and fluctuations in the power output of the reactor core .
this phenomenon reduces the operational flexibility of the plant and may force the down - rating of the reactor . in this work
an innovative approach is used to combine first - principles calculations with thermodynamic data to evaluate the possibility of b incorporation into the crystal structure of nife@xmath0o@xmath1 , under conditions typical to operating nuclear pressurized water nuclear reactors .
analyses of temperature and ph dependence of the defect formation energies indicate that b can accumulate in nife@xmath0o@xmath1 as an interstitial impurity and may therefore be a major contributor to the anomalous axial power shift observed in nuclear reactors .
this computational approach is quite general and applicable to a large variety of solids in equilibrium with aqueous solutions . | a major impediment that prevents pressurized water reactors ( pwrs ) from operating at higher duty and longer cycles is the accumulation of boron within metal oxide scales that deposit on the upper spans of fuel assemblies .
boron , in the form of boric acid ( h@xmath2bo@xmath2 ) , is added to pwr coolant to control the neutron flux while lithium hydroxide ( lioh ) is also dosed to control the acidity of the coolant and to reduce corrosion . because of the large neutron absorption cross section of @xmath3b , a small amount of accumulated b is sufficient to cause an abnormal decrease in the neutron flux , which shifts the power output toward the bottom half of the reactor core .
this phenomenon , known as axial offset anomaly ( aoa ) , has been observed in high - duty reactors that run long fuel - cycles . in extreme form , aoa can decrease the reactor shutdown margin sufficiently to force major power reduction leading to substantial economic losses @xcite .
aoa modeling efforts traditionally assume that boron deposition within the metal oxide scales ( which are commonly referred to as crud , an acronym for chalk river unidentified deposits ) occurs predominantly through precipitation of lithium borate compounds such as libo@xmath0 , li@xmath0bo@xmath4 , li@xmath0b@xmath1o@xmath4 @xcite .
although the retrograde solubility of these borates could explain the `` lithium return '' experienced during plant shutdown , they have never been observed experimentally in pwr crud .
using mssbauer spectroscopy together with xrd on crud scrapes recovered from high duty pwrs , sawicki identified the precipitation of ni@xmath0febo@xmath5 as a possible mechanism for b deposition @xcite .
mesoscale crud models developed by short _
_ , assume that supersaturation of boric acid leads to precipitation of boron trioxide ( b@xmath0o@xmath2 ) within the crud @xcite . in recent work
, we combined _ ab initio _ calculations with experimental formation enthalpies to investigate the incorporation of b into the structure of nickel ferrite ( nife@xmath0o@xmath1 , nfo ) as a potential new mechanism for b deposition within crud @xcite . assuming solid - solid ( and solid - gas ) equilibrium between nickel ferrite and elemental reservoirs of fe , ni ,
b ( and o@xmath0 gas ) we found that it is thermodynamically favorable for b to form secondary phases with fe , ni , and o ( _ e . g. _
b@xmath0o@xmath2 , fe@xmath2bo@xmath5 , and ni@xmath2b@xmath0o@xmath6 ) instead of entering the nfo structure as a point defect .
building on previous works @xcite , the present study attempts to deal with the same question , however , here the defect formation energies are evaluated assuming solid - liquid equilibrium between nfo and the surrounding aqueous solution of ni , fe and dissolved boric acid ( h@xmath2bo@xmath2 ) . to set up solid - liquid equilibrium ,
the chemical potentials of individual aqueous species are defined as a function of temperature , pressure , and concentration and are linked to the chemical potentials of the ionic species in solid .
this new scheme allows for the evaluation of defect formation energies under conditions that are specific to operating nuclear pwrs .
the approach is quite general and applicable to a large variety of solids in equilibrium with aqueous solutions .
the first - principles calculations required for the present study have been carried out within the density functional theory ( dft ) using the same computational parameters and crystal models that are specified in ref . .
the formation of a defect in a crystalline solid can be regarded as an exchange of particles ( atoms and electrons ) between the host material and chemical reservoirs .
the formation energy of a defect _
d _ in charge state _
q _ can be written as @xcite @xmath7 in eq .
, @xmath8 and @xmath9 are the total energies of the defect - containing and defect free solids , calculated within the dft .
the third term on the right side of eq . represents the change in energy due to the exchange of atoms between the host compound and the chemical reservoir , where @xmath10 is the atomic chemical potential of the constituent _ i _ ( _ i _ = ni , fe , or b ) .
the quantity @xmath11 represents the number of atoms added to @xmath12 or removed from @xmath13 the supercell .
the quantity @xmath14 is the fermi energy referenced to the energy of the valence band maximum ( vbm ) of the defective supercell , @xmath15 .
this value is calculated as the vbm energy of the pure nfo , corrected by aligning the core potential of atoms far away from the defect in the defect - containing supercell with that in the defect free supercell @xcite .
the quantity @xmath16 represents the charge state of the defect , _
i. e. _ the number of electrons exchanged with the electron reservoir with chemical potential @xmath14 . under solid - liquid equilibrium conditions , the chemical potentials of the ionic species in the solid,@xmath17 , are equal to the chemical potential of the aqueous species in the saturated solution , @xmath18 .
to derive an expression for defect formation energy , eq .
has to be written in terms of ionic chemical potentials , @xmath17 , instead of atomic chemical potentials , @xmath10 .
this can be accomplished by adding and subtracting the term @xmath19 from eq . .
this term can be interpreted as the energy necessary to exchange electrons between the electron reservoir and the atomic species in the pure nfo . if we combine this energy with the atomic chemical potential ( third term in eq . )
we obtain the ionic chemical potential of species in nfo : @xmath20 in eq .
@xmath21 represents the ionic charge , _ i. e_. the number of electrons exchanged with the electron reservoir to create the ionic species in nfo , and @xmath22 is the energy of the vbm in the pure nfo to which the energy of the electron reservoir @xmath23 is referenced . using eq .
together with the solid - liquid equilibrium condition , @xmath24 , the defect formation energy becomes : @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the energy difference between the defect containing and defect free supercells .
therefore , to calculate the defect formation energy , the chemical potentials of the aqueous species have to be evaluated .
the scheme described above has the advantage that it decouples the ionic charge from the charge state of the defect ; charge neutrality is achieved through exchange of electrons with the electron reservoir with energy equal to the fermi level .
the chemical potential of the aqueous ions , @xmath27 , can be written as the sum of the standard chemical potential , @xmath28 , and a temperature dependent term in eq . , @xmath30 is the universal gas constant and @xmath31 is the activity of the ionic species @xmath32 in the aqueous solution . in the present case , because nfo is weakly soluble in water , the activity of the ionic species can be approximated by the concentration of ions in the solution .
the gibbs energies of formation required for eq . are obtained from that supcrt database @xcite which uses the revised helgeson - kirkham - flowers equation of state to predict the thermodynamic behavior of aqueous species at high temperature and pressure @xcite .
the chemical potentials of the solid phases @xmath37 are usually approximated by the total energy per atom of the elemental solid calculated within the dft framework .
however , as pointed out in earlier work , this approach suffers from incomplete error cancellation when total dft energies of physically and chemically dissimilar systems are compared @xcite . therefore , to compute the elemental - phase chemical potentials of the fe , ni , b , and o , we extend the database of 50 elemental energies published by stevanovic _
et al . _
@xcite to include b. to do this we add 26 b - containing binaries to the large fitting set of 252 compounds that have been used by stevanovic _
et al . _ and solve the overdetermined system of 278 equations for 51 elements using a least - square approach , as described in refs . .
the calculated dft energies and experimental formation enthalpies of the 26 b - containing binaries are listed in table [ table1 ] , while the 51 elemental - phase chemical potentials are given in table [ table2 ] in the appendix .
.[table1 ] dft energies and experimental enthalpies of formation of 26 b - containing binaries that have been added to the fitting set in ref . , to calculate the elemental - phase chemical potentials .
theoretical enthalpies of formation are also listed . [ cols="<,^,^,^",options="header " , ] _ pwr axial offset anomaly ( aoa ) guidelines , revision 1 _ , epri , palo alto , ca , 1008102 ( 2004 ) _ rootcause investigation of axial power offset anomaly _ ,
epri , palo alto , ca , tr-108320 ( 1997 ) . _ modeling pwr fuel corrosion product deposition and growth processes _ , epri , palo alto , ca , 1009734 ( 2004 ) . _ modeling pwr fuel corrosion product deposition and growth process : final report _ ,
epri , palo alto , ca , 1011743 ( 2005 ) .
_ axial offset anomaly ( aoa ) mechanism verification in simulated pwr environments _ , epri , palo alto , ca , 1013423 ( 2006 ) .
_ pressurized water reactor ( pwr ) axial offset anomaly mechanism verification in simulated pwr environments _ , epri , palo alto , ca , 1021038 ( 2010 ) .
s. uchida , y. asakura , and h. suzuki , nucl .
eng . des . *
241 * , 2398 ( 2011 ) .
j. a. sawicki , j. nucl . mater . * 374 * , 248 ( 2008 )
. j. a. sawicki , j. nucl . mater . * 402 * , 124 ( 2010 ) .
m. p. short , d. hussey , b. k. kendrick , t. m. besmann , c. r. stanek , and s. yip , j. nucl .
mater . * 443 * , 579 ( 2013 ) .
rk , c. j. obrien , and d. w. brenner , j. nucl .
mater . * 452 * , 446 ( 2014 ) . c. j. obrien , zs .
rk , and d. w. brenner , j phys - condens mat * 25 * , 445008 ( 2013 ) . c. j. obrien , zs .
rk , and d. w. brenner , j. phys .
c * 118 * , 5414 ( 2014 ) .
k. matsunaga , phys .
b. * 77 * , 104106 ( 2008 ) . s. b. zhang and j. e. northrup , phys .
lett . * 67 * , 2339 ( 1991 ) . s. b. zhang ,
j phys - condens mat * 14 * , r881 ( 2002 ) .
t. windman , t. windman , and e. shock , geochim .
72 * , a1027 ( 2008 ) .
j. w. johnson , e. h. oelkers , and h. c. helgeson , computat .
* 18 * , 899 ( 1992 ) . j. c. tanger and h. c. helgeson , am
* 288 * , 19 ( 1988 ) .
r. o. jones and o. gunnarsson , rev .
* 61 * , 689 ( 1989 ) .
v. stevanovic , s. lany , x. w. zhang , and a. zunger , phys .
b * 85 * , 115104 ( 2012 ) .
s. lany , phys .
b * 78 * , 245207 ( 2008 ) .
a. jain , g. hautier , s. p. ong , c. j. moore , c. c. fischer , k. a. persson , and g. ceder , phys .
b * 84 * , 045115 ( 2011 ) .
m. todorova and j. neugebauer , phys .
rev . applied * 1 * , 014001 ( 2014 ) .
k. fujiwara and m. domae , in proceedings of 14th international conference on the properties of water and steam , edited by m. nakahara et al .
( maruzen co. , ltd , kyoto , 2004 ) , p. 581 . a. v. bandura and s. n. lvov , j phys chem ref data * 35 * , 15 ( 2006 ) .
a. e. paladino , j. am .
. soc . * 42 * , 168 ( 1959 ) .
h. m. obryan , f. r. monforte , and r. blair , j. am .
. soc . * 48 * , 577 ( 1965 ) .
a. t. nelson , j. t. white , d. a. andersson , j. a. aguiar , k. j. mcclellan , d. d. byler , m. p. short , and c. r. stanek , j. am .
. soc . * 97 * , 1559 ( 2014 ) . | impediment pressurized water reactors higher duty longer cycles accumulation of boron within metal oxide scales upper fuel assemblies boron boric acid@xmath2bo added to pwr coolant control neutron flux lithium hydroxide ) dosed control acidity reduce corrosion large neutron absorption cross section @xmath3b small amount accumulated b abnormal decrease neutron flux shifts power output toward bottom half reactor core phenomenon axial offset anomaly ( aoa observed in high - duty reactors long fuel - cycles extreme form aoa can decrease reactor shutdown margin major power reduction substantial economic losses assume boron deposition within metal oxide scales crud occurs through precipitation of lithium borate compounds retrograde solubility borates explain lithium return plant shutdown never observed in pwr crud using mssbauer spectroscopy xrd on crud scrapes identified precipitation of ni@xmath0febo@xmath5 possible mechanism for b depositionmesoscale crud models by short assume supersaturation boric acid leads precipitation boron trioxide b@xmath0o within crud @xcite work combined calculations with experimental formation enthalpies incorporation b into structure nickel ferrite potential mechanism for b deposition crud assuming equilibrium between nickel ferrite reservoirs fe ni b o gas thermodynamically favorable for b to form secondary phases with fe ni o b@xmath0o ni instead of entering nfo structure point defect present study same question defect formation energies evaluated assuming solid - liquid equilibrium between nfo and aqueous solution of ni , fe dissolved boric acid h@xmath2bo chemical potentials of aqueous species function of temperature pressure concentration linked to chemical potentials ionic species solid scheme allows evaluation defect formation energies under conditions specific operating nuclear pwrs approach applicable to solids equilibrium with aqueous solutions first - principles calculations carried out within density functional theory using same computational parameters crystal models in refformation defect in crystalline solid exchange particles atoms electrons between host material chemical reservoirs formation energy defect written as @xcite @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 are total energies of defect - containing defect free solids calculated third term represents change energy due to exchange atoms between host compound chemical reservoir @xmath10 is atomic chemical potential of constituent quantity @xmath11 atoms added to @xmath12 or removed from @xmath13 supercell @xmath14 is fermi energy valence band maximum of defective supercell @xmath15 calculated as vbm energy of pure nfo corrected by aligning core potential of atoms defect - containing supercell with defect free supercell quantity @xmath16 represents charge state of defect number of electrons exchanged with electron reservoir chemical potential @xmath14 under solid - liquid equilibrium chemical potentials ionic species in solid equal to aqueous species in saturated solution defect formation energy ionic chemical potentials instead atomic chemical potentials adding subtracting term @xmath19 from energy necessary to exchange electrons between electron reservoir atomic species in pure nfocombine energy with atomic chemical potential obtain ionic chemical potential species nfo : @xmath20 @xmath21 represents ionic charge number electrons exchanged with electron reservoir ionic species @xmath22 energy vbm pure nfo energy electron reservoir @xmath23 referenced solid - liquid equilibrium condition defect formation energy @xmath25 @xmath26 energy difference between defect containing defect free supercells calculate defect formation energy chemical potentials aqueous species evaluated scheme decouples ionic charge from charge state defect charge neutrality achieved through exchange electrons with electron reservoir energy equal to fermi level chemical potential aqueous ions @xmath27 sum standard chemical potential @xmath28 temperature dependent term @xmath30 universal gas constant @xmath31 activity ionic species @xmath32 aqueous solution nfo weakly soluble in water activity ionic species approximated by concentration of ions solution gibbs energies of formation obtained from database @xcite behavior aqueous species high temperature pressure chemical potentials of solid phases @xmath37 approximated by total energy per atom elemental solid dft frameworkpointed approach suffers from incomplete error cancellation when dft energies of dissimilar systems compared to compute elemental - phase chemical potentials of fe ni b o extend database of 50 elemental energies stevanovic to include b add 26 b - containing binaries to fitting set 252 compounds solve system 278 equations for 51 elements using least - approach calculated dft energies experimental formation enthalpies of 26 b - containing binaries listed in table table1 51 elemental - phase chemical potentials in table table2 appendix dft energies experimental enthalpies of formation of 26 b - containing binaries added to fitting set theoretical enthalpies of formation listed axial offset anomaly guidelines revision 1 palo alto 1008102 ( 2004 ) rootcause investigation of axial power offset anomaly-108320 ( 1997 ) modeling fuel corrosion product deposition growth processes 1009734 ( 2004 ) modeling fuel corrosion final report 1011743 ( 2005 )axial offset anomaly verification simulated pwr epri palo alto ca 1013423 ( 2006 ) pressurized water reactor axial offset anomaly verification simulated environments epri palo alto 1021038 ( 2010 ) s. uchida. asakura h. suzuki nucl eng 241 2398 ( 2011 ) j a. sawicki nucl mater ( 2008 ) 402 124 ( 2010 ) p. short d. hussey kendrick besmann. stanek s. yip nucl mater 443 579 ( 2013 ) j. obrien d. w. brenner nucl 452 446 ( 2014 ) obrien brenner phys - condens mat 25 445008 ( 2013 ) brenner phys 118 5414 ( 2014 ) k. matsunaga phys 77 * 104106 ( 2008 ) s. b. zhang j e. northrup phys . 67 2339 ( 1991 ) b zhang phys - condens mat 14 r881 ( 2002 ) t. windman e.shock geochim 72 * a1027 2008 ) w. johnson h oelkers h c helgeson 18 899 ( 1992 ) c. tanger h helgeson 288 19 ( 1988 ) o. jones o gunnarsson 61 689 ( 1989 ) stevanovic s. lany zhang a zunger 85 115104 ( 2012 ) lany 78 245207 ( 2008 ) a. jain. hautier s p. ong j moore fischer persson ceder phys 84 045115 ( 2011 ). todorova j. neugebauer 1 014001 ( 2014 ). fujiwara m. domae proceedings 14th international conference properties water steam m nakahara maruzen kyoto 2004 ) 581 v. bandura s n. lvov phys chem data 35 15 ( 2006 ) e paladino am soc 42 168 ( 1959 ). obryan f r. monforte r. blair 48 577 ( 1965 ) t. nelson j t. white andersson j aguiarmcclellan byler m p. short r stanek j am soc 97 1559 2014 ) | 0.509732 | 3,079 | 1,521 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,836 | we get four quartered aztec diamonds by dividing an aztec diamond region by two zigzag cuts passing its center .
w. jockusch and j. propp ( in an unpublished work ) found that the number of tilings of quartered aztec diamonds is given by simple product formulas . in this paper
we present a simple proof for this result .
* keywords : * aztec diamond , domino , tilings , perfect matchings | in this paper a ( lattice ) _ region _ is a connected union of unit squares in the square lattice .
a domino is the union of two unit squares that share an edge .
a ( domino ) _ tiling _ of a region @xmath0 is a covering of @xmath0 by dominos such that there are no gaps or overlaps .
denote by @xmath1 the number of tilings of the region @xmath0 .
the _ aztec diamond _ of order @xmath2 is defined to be the union of all the unit squares with integral corners @xmath3 satisfying @xmath4 .
the aztec diamond of order @xmath5 is shown in figure [ qa2](a ) .
in @xcite it was shown that the number of tilings of the aztec diamond of order @xmath2 is @xmath6 . , and its division into two congruent parts.,width=377 ] next
, we consider three related families of regions name _ quartered aztec diamonds _ , that were introduced by jockusch and propp @xcite . divide the aztec diamond of order @xmath2 into two congruent parts by a zigzag cut with 2-unit steps ( see figure [ qa2](b ) for an example with @xmath7 ) . by superimposing two such zigzag cuts that pass the center of the aztec diamond we partition the region into four parts , called quartered aztec diamonds .
up to symmetry , there are essentially two different ways we can superimpose the two cuts . for one of them
, we obtained a fourfold rotational symmetric pattern , and four resulting parts are congruent ( see figure [ qa](a ) ) .
denote by @xmath8 these quartered aztec diamonds .
for the other , the obtained pattern has klein 4-group reflection symmetry and there are two different kinds of quartered aztec diamonds ( see figure [ qa ] ( b ) ) ; they are called _ abutting _ and _ non - abutting _ quartered aztec diamonds . denote by @xmath9 and @xmath10 the abutting and non - abutting quartered aztec diamonds of order @xmath2 , respectively .
.,width=377 ] the number of tilings of a region three kinds of quartered aztec diamond can be obtained by the theorem stated below ( @xcite , theorem 1 ) [ main ] @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 in @xcite , juckusch and propp presented a proof for theorem 1 by investigating properties of _ antisymmetric monotone triangles _ "
. we will prove theorem [ main ] by a visual way in the next section
we have 4 recurrences that were proved by m. ciucu in@xcite , theorem 4.1 .
the _ dual graph _ of a region @xmath0 is the graph whose vertices are unit square in @xmath0 and whose edges connect precisely two unit squares sharing an edge .
a _ perfect matching _ of a graph @xmath22 is a collection of edges such that each vertex of @xmath22 is adjacent to exactly one selected edge .
denote by @xmath23 the number of perfect matchings of @xmath22 . by a well - known bijection between tilings of a region and perfect matchings of its dual graph , we enumerate perfect matchings of the dual graph of a region rather than enumerating its tilings directly .
since we are considering only regions in the square lattice , one can view the dual graphs of those regions as subgraphs of the infinite square grid @xmath24 .
an edge in a graph @xmath22 is called a _ forced edge _ , if it is in every perfect matching of @xmath22 .
one can remove some forced edges from a graph to get a new graph with the same number of perfect matchings .
we have the following lemma by considering forced edges in the dual graphs of quartered aztec diamonds .
instead of comparing the numbers of tilings of the regions , we compare the numbers of perfect matchings of their dual graphs . in each of the four equalities , the dual graph of the region on the left
is obtained from the dual graph of the region on the right by removing forced edges .
the proofs of ( [ eq5])-([eq8 ] ) are illustrated by figures [ force1 ] ( a)-(d ) , respectively . in these figures , the forced edges are represented by the bold edges , and the dual graph of the region on the left of each equality is represented by the graph consisting of shaded unit squares .
next , we consider a well - known family of graphs as follows . consider a @xmath29 rectangular chessboard and suppose that the corners are black .
the @xmath30 _ aztec rectangle _ is the graph whose vertices are the white square and whose edges connect precisely those pairs of white squares that are diagonally adjacent ( see figure [ holeyar](a ) for an example with @xmath31 and @xmath32 ) .
we are interested in the the number of perfect matchings of two families of _ holey aztec rectangles _ as follows .
[ lem4]the number of perfect matchings of a @xmath30 aztec rectangle , where all the vertices in the bottom - most row , except for the @xmath33-st , the @xmath34-nd , @xmath35 , and the @xmath36-th vertex , have been removed ( see figure [ holeyar](b ) for an example with @xmath31 , @xmath32 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 ) , equals @xmath40 [ lem5 ] the number of perfect matchings of a @xmath30 aztec rectangle , where all the vertices in the bottom - most row have been removed , and where the @xmath33-st , the @xmath34-nd , @xmath35 , and the @xmath36-th vertex , have been removed from the resulting graph ( see figure [ holeyar](c ) , for and example with @xmath31 , @xmath32 , @xmath41 , @xmath42,@xmath43 ) , equals @xmath44 let @xmath22 be a connected subgraph of @xmath24 symmetric about a diagonal lattice @xmath47
. assume all the vertices of @xmath22 on @xmath47 are consecutive lattice points on that line .
go along the line @xmath47 from left to right , and alternate between deleting the edges of @xmath22 that touch them from below , and deleting the edges of @xmath22 that touch them from above ( see figure [ factor ] for an example ) .
let @xmath48 and @xmath49 be the connected components of the resulting graph that are above and below @xmath47 .
it is easy to see that the number of vertices of @xmath22 on @xmath47 must be even if @xmath22 has perfect matchings , let @xmath50 be half of this number . then ciucu s factorization theorem @xcite implies that @xmath51 apply the factorization theorem to the graph @xmath58 with the symmetric axis @xmath47 .
there are @xmath59 vertices of @xmath22 on @xmath47 , so @xmath60 .
it is easy to see that @xmath48 is isomorphic to the dual graph of @xmath61 , and @xmath49 is isomorphic to the dual graph of @xmath62 ( see figure [ qa8](a ) for the case @xmath63 )
. then ( [ eq9 ] ) follows .
again , we apply the factorization theorem to the graph @xmath64 with the symmetric axis @xmath65 .
it is easy to see that @xmath66 is isomorphic to the dual graph of @xmath62 , and @xmath67 is isomorphic to the dual graph of @xmath68 ( the case @xmath63 is shown in figure [ qa8](b ) ) .
moreover , it is easy to see @xmath69 .
this implies ( [ eq10 ] ) .
similarly , two equalities ( [ eq11 ] ) and ( [ eq12 ] ) can be obtained from applying the factorization theorem to @xmath70 and @xmath71 ; and the proofs are illustrated in figures [ qa7](a ) and ( b ) , respectively .
assume @xmath72 and @xmath73 are two sets defined in lemma [ lem3 ] .
denote by @xmath74 the product is taken over all elements @xmath75 s in @xmath72 .
similarly we denote by @xmath76 the corresponding product with elements in @xmath73 .
since the dual graph @xmath22 of @xmath8 is a bipartite graph , the numbers of vertices in two vertex classes of @xmath22 must be the same if @xmath22 admits perfect matchings . by enumerating vertices in each vertex class
we can prove ( [ main1 ] ) ( see example for @xmath63 in figure [ main1eq ] ; the difference between the numbers of vertices in two classes are 1 ) .
similarly , we get the ratio @xmath89 by dividing ( [ eq9 ] ) by ( [ eq10 ] )
. then from ( [ eq7 ] ) and the formula ( [ main3 ] ) for @xmath86 , we can verify ( [ main5 ] ) for @xmath86 .
again , two equalities ( [ eq11 ] ) and ( [ eq12 ] ) imply the ratio @xmath90 ; then from ( [ eq8 ] ) and the equality ( [ main4 ] ) for @xmath86 , we get ( [ main6 ] ) for @xmath86 .
c. krattenthaler .
schur function identities and the number of perfect matchings of holey aztec rectangles .
_ q - series from a contemporary perspective _ ( south hadley , ma ) : 335349 , 1998 .
, 254 , amer .
soc . , providence , ri , 2000 . | paper lattice region connected union squares lattice domino union two squares edge domino tiling region @xmath0 covering @xmath0 by dominos no gaps overlaps denote @xmath1 number of tilings region aztec diamond order @xmath2 union unit squares with integral corners @xmath3 satisfying @xmath4 aztec diamond @xmath5 shown in figure [ qa2](a ) @xcite number tilings aztec diamond @xmath2 is @xmath6 division into two congruent parts consider three related families quartered aztec diamonds introduced by jockusch and propp divide aztec diamond @xmath2 into two parts by zigzag cut with 2-unit steps figure [ qa2](b ) example superimposing two zigzag cuts partition region into four parts quartered aztec diamonds two ways superimpose two cuts fourfold rotational symmetric pattern four parts congruent figure qa](a denote by @xmath8 quartered aztec diamonds other pattern has 4-group reflection symmetry two different kinds of quartered aztec diamonds abutting and non - abutting quartered aztec diamondsdenote @xmath9 @xmath10 abutting non - abutting quartered aztec diamonds order @xmath2 =377 number tilings region three kinds of quartered aztec diamond obtained by theorem ( @xcite , theorem 1 ) @xmath11 juckusch propp proof theorem 1 antisymmetric monotone triangles prove theorem visual way 4 recurrences proved by m. ciucu@xcite theorem 4.1 dual graph of region @xmath0 vertices unit square edges connect two unit squares edge perfect matching of graph @xmath22 collection edges each vertex adjacent to one selected edge denote @xmath23 number of perfect matchings of @xmath22 bijection between tilings region perfect matchings dual graph enumerate perfect matchings dual graph considering regions square lattice view dual graphs as subgraphs of infinite square grid @xmath24 edge in graph @xmath22 forced edge every perfect matching remove forced edges new graph same number perfect matchings lemma considering forced edges in dual graphs of quartered aztec diamonds instead comparing numbers tilings compare numbers of perfect matchings dual graphsfour equalities dual graph left obtained from right removing forced edges proofs of ( [ eq5])-([eq8 ] ) illustrated by figures [ force1 ] ( a)-(d ) forced edges represented by bold edges dual graph left by shaded squares consider family graphs @xmath29 rectangular chessboard corners black @xmath30 _ aztec rectangle _ graph vertices white square edges connect pairs white squares diagonally adjacent see figure [ holeyar](a ) example @xmath31 and @xmath32 interested in number perfect matchings of two families aztec rectangles _lem4 number perfect matchings of @xmath30 aztec rectangle vertices bottom - most row except @xmath33-st-nd-th vertex removed see figure holeyar](b ) example with @xmath31 ) equals @xmath40 lem5 number perfect matchings @xmath30 aztec rectangle vertices bottom - most removed @xmath33-st-nd-th vertex removed from graph see figure holeyar](c ) example @xmath31 ) equals @xmath44 @xmath22 connected subgraph of @xmath24 symmetric about diagonal lattice @xmath47 assume vertices @xmath22 on @xmath47 consecutive lattice points line go along line @xmath47 left to right alternate between deleting edges @xmath22 below above see figure [ factor ] example @xmath48 and @xmath49 connected components of resulting graph above and below @xmath47 number of vertices of @xmath22 on @xmath47 be even if perfect matchings let @xmath50 be half of numberciucu s factorization theorem implies @xmath51 graph @xmath58 symmetric axis @xmath47 @xmath59 vertices @xmath22 on @xmath47 @xmath48 isomorphic @xmath61 @xmath49 @xmath62 figure qa8](a @xmath63 ( [ eq9 ] ) follows apply factorization theorem graph @xmath64 symmetric axis @xmath65 @xmath66 isomorphic @xmath62 @xmath67 @xmath68 case @xmath63 figure qa8](b ) @xmath69 implies ( [ eq10 ] ) two equalities ( [ eq11 ] [ eq12 ] ) obtained applying factorization theorem to @xmath70 @xmath71 proofs illustrated in figures [ qa7](a b ) assume @xmath72 @xmath73 two sets defined lemma ] denote @xmath74 product taken over elements @xmath75 s @xmath72 @xmath76 product elements @xmath73 dual graph @xmath22 @xmath8 bipartite numbers vertices two classes @xmath22 same if perfect matchingsenumerating vertices class prove main1 ] ) example @xmath63 figure difference vertices classes 1 ratio @xmath89 dividing eq9 ] by eq10 ] ) eq7 ] formula main3 ] @xmath86 verify [ main5 ] ) @xmath86 equalities eq11 ] eq12 ] imply ratio @xmath90 eq8 ] equality main4 ] ) @xmath86 get [ main6 ] ) @xmath86 krattenthaler schur function identities perfect matchings holey aztec rectangles q - series contemporary perspective south hadley , ma 335349 1998 254 amer. soc . providence 2000 | 0.350749 | 2,184 | 1,143 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,841 | we propose a qualitative scenario to interpret the argued association between the recent direct measurement of the gravitational wave event gw150914 by ligo - virgo collaborations and the hard @xmath0-ray transient detected by fermi - gbm @xmath1 sec after . in a binary system of two
gravitationally collapsing objects with a non - vanishing electric charge , the compenetration of the two magnetospheres occurring during the coalescence , through turbulent magnetic reconnection , produces a highly collimated relativistic outflow that becomes optically thin and shines in the gbm field of view .
we propose that this process should be expected as a commonplace in the future joint gravitational / electromagnetic detections .
[ firstpage ] physical data and processes : turbulence ; ism : cosmic rays , magnetic fields . | the recently and long - awaited direct detection of a gravitational waves source ( gw150914 ) by the laser interferometer gravitational wave observatory ( ligo ) collaboration with the virgo collaboration @xcite was shown to be consistent with numerical simulations of the merger of a black hole ( bh ) binary system with masses @xmath2 @xcite .
it has been already stressed that this result is groundbreaking in several respects : it shows that binaries of gravitationally collapsed objects exist and merge within the age of the universe .
the merger of binary supermassive bhs has been shown by a number of numerical simulations @xcite to produce a collimated electromagnetic flash accompanying the gw event
. however , standard scalings in the pioneeristic work by @xcite are inconsistent with the large luminosity ( @xmath3 erg@xmath4s ) of the transient signal detected by gamma - ray burst monitor ( gbm ) on board the _ fermi _ satellite at photon energy @xmath5 kev @xcite , as discussed by @xcite .
owing to the exceptional impact of such an association , it seems worth exploring at least qualitatively a possible scenario for the joint events as already done , e.g. , in @xcite .
the widely accepted blanford - znajek mechanism envisages supermassive rotating bhs ( typically @xmath6 ) powering electromagnetic jets with luminosity @xmath7 erg@xmath4s and with circum - bh disks currents sustaining a magnetic field near the bh of order of @xmath8 gauss .
the luminosity of the gbm transient combined with @xmath9 bhs makes the association of gw150914 with the gbm transient unlikely as it would imply implausibly high magnetic fields .
we propose that the compenetration of the two magnetospheres amplifies by orders of magnitude the magnetic energy and drive , through reconnection , the release of a relativistically hot and optically thick pair plasma .
we argue in this short note that the latter scenario might be a commonplace electromagnetic source associated with merger of collapsed objects .
the source of gw 150914 very likely comprises of two objects at the final stage of their gravitational collapse , close to their respective horizons , inspiralling and moving at a good fraction of the speed of light . even if only mass ( @xmath10 ) , charge ( @xmath11 ) and spin ( @xmath12 ) are bhs observables , it is customary to assume that stationary bhs in the universe have no substantial charge ( @xmath13 in geometric units ) for a far - away observer .
we allow for each of the collapsing objects to carry a non - vanishing global electric charge @xmath13 and spin angular momentum @xmath12 .
we have no argument to support that the charge can not be quenched as it is customarily assumed ; we merely examine here the consequences of a magnetosphere supported by an intrinsic electric charge during the inspiral . if the two spins @xmath12 are anti - aligned and approximately orthogonal to the orbital plane , the compression of the anti - parallel magnetic field lines within the current sheet separating the two magnetospheres will drive a violent turbulent magnetic reconnection , which can eject a relativistically hot pair plasma that later emits the hard @xmath0-rays signal detected by fermi .
the problem of gravitational collapse of an electrically charged and spherically symmetric shell has been long investigated @xcite .
astrophysical implications of a charged collapsing object have been explored in the past two decades in connection with grbs prompt and afterglow high - energy light curves ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) and @xmath14 and @xmath15-ray band spectral evolution @xcite . for a stationary isolated kerr - newman bh , it is well - known that , upon developing the general relativistic solution in a far - away observer rest frame , the leading components to order @xmath16 of the electromagnetic stress - energy tensor @xmath17 behave , as for the magnetic field @xmath18 , as magnetic dipole : @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 , where @xmath22 is the angular momentum of spin per mass unit and @xmath23 are @xcite coordinates .
the space - time geometry within a binary bh circular orbit is accessible only through numerical simulations and an analytical formulation is not known to date and possibly inexistent .
our first ansatz is that the magnetic dipole structure is approximately preserved within the inspiralling orbit .
turbulent magnetic reconnection has been repeatedly invoked in the past decade to explain the production of non - thermal particles populations , beside thermal heating , for those observations that were not complying with time - space constraints of well - understood mechanisms or with ideal mhd , traditionally in solar flares @xcite and more recently in the intensity peak of energetic particles at solar termination shock @xcite , and in relativistic astrophysical outflows ( see @xcite and references therein ) .
we argue that , during the last phase of the magnetospheres coalescence , turbulent compenetration at the current sheet layer dissipates magnetic energy into relativistically hot thermal pair plasma and non - thermal particles ejected in a highly collimated relativistic outflow .
a cartoon illustration in fig .
[ fig ] shows the current sheet layer that ejects the thermal pair plasma into the downstream cone along @xmath24-axis .
the electric field @xmath25 accelerates particles ( electrons along @xmath26 and positrons along @xmath27 ) as long as the particles remain confined within the boundary layer and gives rise to a non - thermal distribution ( see , e.g. , recent simulations of relativistic reconnection in flat space - time in @xcite ) .
assuming @xmath28 does not alter the main process in this simplified scenario . the relativistic highly collimated thermal plasma of pairs electron - positrons and photons outflowing the reconnecting region will propagate ( bulk lorentz @xmath29 ) as far as the plasma rest frame opacity of the high - energy @xmath15-ray to the electron - positron pair production drops to @xmath30 ( as discussed for grbs in @xcite )
; at this point the electromagnetic radiation is released in a single pulse detected at earth as the gbm transient of arrival time @xmath31 duration given by @xmath32 sec .
the gw signal emitted at the binary merger travels undisturbed presumably at the speed of light with infinite mean free path .
it has been already estimated @xcite that the observed arrival time delay @xmath33 is compatible with a distance travelled by an ultra - relativistic plasma ( @xmath29 ) of order of @xmath34 cm . at such a distance from the coalescence location ,
much larger than the clean circum - merger medium , the ejected plasma emits the gbm flash .
axis and charged particles that move back and forth across the reconnection layer while being accelerated by @xmath25 along the speiser orbits . [ fig],width=340 ]
the scenario qualitatively described above requires obviously a detailed demonstration through analytic estimates or extended resistive general relativistic mhd simulations .
we only argue here that the process of magnetic reconnection at the compenetration of magnetospheres of compact objects might be considerable source of electromagnetic radiation .
the reconnection growth rate in force - free relativistic reconnection @xcite can be cast as @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the alfvn time - scale and @xmath37 the resistive time - scale , both measured in the local lorentz frame . by using the estimate of @xmath15 for magnetars magnetosphere @xcite
, one can approximate the reconnection rate for a current sheet thickness of @xmath38 cm as @xmath39 the time - scale @xmath40 is measured in the local reference frame of the reconnecting layer ; thus , it does not account for the gravitational redshift in the unknown space - time geometry ( we remind that the frequency at the observer frame @xmath41 is shifed from the frequency in the source frame @xmath42 by a factor @xmath43 , for the schwarzschild metric , that can be very small close to the horizon ) , the dilation of @xmath40 due to gravitational redshift is weaker . ] .
however , on the very short merging time - scale due to highly relativistic flow speed involved , the actual reconnection can be limited to a current sheet thickness @xmath44 cm , greatly reducing @xmath40 @xcite .
the conversion of @xmath40 to the observer frame is also affected by doppler shift ( @xmath45 $ ] , where @xmath46 is the source speed and @xmath47 is the angle of the direction of photon emission with respect to the line of sight to the observer located far away from the source ) , arrival time dilation due to the fact that two photons emitted with a certain time - lag @xmath48 in the plasma comoving frame are detected with a different time - lag by the observer at earth @xmath33 because the source is moving ( @xmath49 ) and cosmological redshift ( @xmath50 for gw150914 ) . as an order of magnitude estimate , a radiation pulse emitted when the pair plasma at @xmath29 reaches transparency can easily produce a pulse @xmath1 sec delayed from gw150914 @xcite . by assuming that the magnetic field @xmath51 upstream of the reconnecting current sheet inflows at speed @xmath52 in the late merging phase near the horizon ( @xmath53 ) , one can equate @xmath54 to the gbm transient luminosity ( @xmath55 erg@xmath4s ) ; the resulting magnetic field of order @xmath56 gauss is not unusual for magnetars although it rules out magnetic field sustained by an accretion disk in a configuration _ _
la @xcite . in this treatment
the value of the @xmath57 is not relevant as long as the merging magnetospheres can be sustained during the coalescence process .
also , we did not discuss here the process leading to the formation of the collapsing rotating stars . before the detection of gw150914 ,
binary bhs were not deemed to exist in reality : models of gravitational collapse of massive stars in an already formed binary system and model of coalescence of two bhs moving one with respect to the other with a sufficiently small impact parameter have both unresolved issues .
we have used here magnetosphere of a kerr - newman bh for an object close to the final stage of its gravitational collapse .
it is expected that in the local lorentz frame where the reconnecting magnetic field lines come close to each other , the current sheet layer is dragged along the orbital motion of the compact objects and stretched by differential rotation , developing strong shear instabilities ( see @xcite for the shear instability for an isolated neutron star ) . those instabilities will presumably grow faster and faster as the system merge .
a noteworthy caveat on the scenario here proposed is that the current modelling of turbulent magnetic reconnection is still under development .
moreover , _ in situ _ solar wind measurements @xcite did not confirm that field dissipation efficiently transfers magnetic energy to a non - thermal particle population in non - relativistic flows .
however , several recent numerical experiments seemingly support that reconnection produces energetic particles power - laws in various astrophysical contexts @xcite .
this scenario will be further investigated within either the framework of tearing mode instabilities , or petschek model of two slow mode shocks @xcite , both cases in the incompressible regime as usually assumed in the literature .
we hope that the scenario here proposed for the claimed association of the directly detected gw signal with a hard @xmath0-ray transient signal , and the expected future joint detections , will stimulate fresh thoughts and prompt detailed resistive general relativity numerical investigations .
we acknowledge useful comments and feedbacks by d. arnett , m. begelman , m. rees , l. rezzolla , b. zhang .
this work was supported , in part , by nasa under grants nnx13ag10 g and nnx15aj71 g . | detection of gravitational waves source gw150914 ) by laser interferometer gravitational wave observatory with virgo collaboration consistent with simulations merger black hole bh binary system with masses @xmath2 result groundbreaking shows binaries of gravitationally collapsed objects exist merge within universe merger of binary supermassive bhs collimated electromagnetic flash standard scalings @xcite inconsistent with large luminosity @xmath3 erg@xmath4s ) of transient signal detected by gamma - ray burst monitor fermi satellite photon energy @xmath5 kev @xcite exploring possible scenario for joint events blanford - znajek mechanism envisages supermassive rotating bhs @xmath6 ) powering electromagnetic jets with luminosity @xmath7 erg@xmath4s circum - bh disks currents sustaining magnetic field near @xmath8 gauss luminosity gbm transient with @xmath9 bhs makes association of gw150914 with gbm unlikely high magnetic fields compenetration of magnetospheres amplifies magnetic energy release of hot thick pair plasmaargue latter scenario commonplace electromagnetic source merger collapsed objects source of gw 150914 likely comprises two objects final stage gravitational collapse close horizons inspiralling moving fraction speed light mass charge spin bhs observables assume stationary bhs have no substantial charge for far - away observer allow collapsing objects carry non - vanishing global electric charge spin angular momentum no argument support charge not quenched examine consequences of magnetosphere supported by intrinsic electric charge during inspiral two spins anti - aligned orthogonal to orbital plane compression anti - parallel magnetic field lines magnetospheres drive violent turbulent magnetic reconnection eject hot pair plasma emits hard @xmath0-rays signal detected fermi problem gravitational collapse of electrically charged spherically symmetric shell investigated astrophysical implications of charged collapsing object explored past decades grbs prompt afterglow high - energy light curves @xmath14 @xmath15-ray band spectral evolutionstationary isolated kerr - newman bh developing general relativistic solution far - observer rest frame leading components @xmath16 electromagnetic stress - energy tensor @xmath17 behave magnetic dipole @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 angular momentum spin per mass unit @xmath23 @xcite coordinates space - time geometry binary bh circular orbit accessible numerical simulations analytical formulation not known possibly inexistent magnetic dipole structure preserved inspiralling orbit turbulent magnetic reconnection invoked explain production non - thermal particles populations thermal heating observations space solar flares @xcite intensity peak energetic particles solar termination shock @xcite relativistic astrophysical outflows last phase magnetospheres coalescence turbulent compenetration current sheet layer dissipates magnetic energy into hot thermal pair plasma non - thermal particles ejected collimated relativistic outflow cartoon illustration fig shows current sheet layer ejects thermal pair plasma downstream cone @xmath24-axis electric field @xmath25 accelerates particles electrons boundary layer non - thermal distributionsimulations relativistic reconnection flat space - time @xcite @xmath28 alter process relativistic collimated thermal plasma electron - positrons photons outflowing reconnecting region propagate @xmath29 plasma rest frame opacity high - energy @xmath15-ray electron - positron production @xmath30 electromagnetic radiation released single pulse earth gbm transient arrival time @xmath31 duration @xmath32 sec gw signal binary merger travels speed of light infinite mean free path estimated arrival time delay @xmath33 compatible with distance ultra - relativistic plasma @xmath29 @xmath34 cm distance coalescence location ejected plasma emits gbm flash charged particles move across reconnection layer accelerated by @xmath25 orbits scenario requires detailed demonstration analytic estimates relativistic simulations magnetic reconnection compenetration magnetospheres compact objects source electromagnetic radiation reconnection growth rate force - free relativistic reconnection @xcite cast @xmath35 @xmath36 alfvn time - scale @xmath37 resistive time - scale measured local lorentz frameestimate @xmath15 magnetars magnetosphere @xcite reconnection rate current sheet thickness @xmath38 cm time - scale @xmath40 measured local reference frame reconnecting layer account gravitational redshift unknown space - time geometry frequency observer frame @xmath41 shifed from source frame @xmath42 factor @xmath43 small close horizon dilation @xmath40 due to gravitational redshift weaker short merging time - scale relativistic flow speed reconnection limited to current sheet thickness @xmath44 cm reducing @xmath40 @xcite conversion @xmath40 observer frame affected by doppler shift @xmath45 @xmath46 source speed @xmath47 angle direction photon emission line sight observer arrival time dilation due two photons emitted time - lag @xmath48 plasma frame detected observer earth @xmath33 source moving cosmological redshift @xmath50 gw150914 radiation pulse emitted plasma @xmath29 reaches transparency produce pulse @xmath1 sec delayed from gw150914 @xciteassuming magnetic field @xmath51 upstream reconnecting inflows at speed @xmath52 late merging phase near horizon equate @xmath54 to gbm transient luminosity @xmath55@xmath4s resulting magnetic field @xmath56 gauss not unusual for magnetars rules out field sustained accretion disk @xcite value @xmath57 not relevant merging magnetospheres sustained during coalescence discuss process formation collapsing rotating stars before detection gw150914 binary bhs models gravitational collapse massive stars coalescence of two bhs small impact unresolved used magnetosphere kerr - newman bh for object close final stage gravitational collapse expected local lorentz frame reconnecting magnetic field lines close current sheet layer dragged along orbital motion stretched by differential rotation developing strong shear instabilities see @xcite isolated neutron star instabilities grow faster as system merge current modelling of turbulent magnetic reconnection under development solar wind measurements confirm field dissipation transfers magnetic energy to non - thermal particle population non - relativistic flowsexperiments support reconnection produces energetic particles power laws astrophysical contexts scenario investigated tearing mode instabilities petschek model slow mode shocks incompressible regime hope scenario association detected gw signal @xmath0-ray transient signal future joint detections stimulate thoughts prompt resistive general relativity investigations acknowledge comments feedbacks by d. arnett m. begelman m. rees l. rezzolla b. zhang work supported by nasa grants nnx13ag10 g nnx15aj71 g | 0.435865 | 2,552 | 1,302 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,844 | based on 7.8 million @xmath0 events collected at bepc , the events for @xmath1 and @xmath2 have been selected and reconstructed .
clear peaks are observed around 1480 mev in @xmath3 invariant mass spectrum and near the threshold for @xmath4 production in @xmath5 invariant mass spectrum .
a partial wave analysis of @xmath6 data has been performed .
two @xmath7 resonances are observed with mass and width ( m , @xmath8 ) at ( @xmath9 , @xmath10 ) mev and ( @xmath11 , @xmath12)mev , and are considered to be the nucleon resonances @xmath13 and @xmath14 respectively . | nucleons are the most common form of hadronic matter on the earth and probably in the whole universe .
understanding their internal structure will give us insight into how the real world works .
an important source of information about the nucleon internal structure is the nucleon excitation spectrum .
our present knowledge on this aspect came almost entirely from partial - wave analyses of @xmath15 total , elastic , and charge - exchange scattering data of more than twenty years ago@xcite . since the late 1970 s , very little has happened in experimental @xmath16 baryon spectroscopy .
considering its importance for the understanding of the baryon structure and for distinguishing various pictures @xcite of the nonperturbative regime of qcd , a new generation of experiments on n * physics with electromagnetic probes have recently been started at new facilities , such as cebaf at jlab , elsa at bonn , graal at grenoble and so on .
one of us , zou suggested @xcite that we can also study @xmath16 baryon in j@xmath17 decay to baryon - antibaryon final states , which provide a new laboratory for study of @xmath16 baryon , especially in the mass range of 1 - 2 gev .
for example , the @xmath18 is an excellent channel to study the @xmath19 state which has a very large decay branching ratio to the @xmath20 @xcite , while other baryon resonances below 2.0 gev do not have a large branching ratio to decay in this channel@xcite , a fact noted very early in the development of the quark shell model @xcite . in this paper ,
based on 7.8 million @xmath0 events collected at bepc , the events for @xmath1 and @xmath2 have been selected and reconstructed .
we perform a partial wave analysis(pwa ) on @xmath21 data in the full mass region of @xmath22(@xmath23 ) .
this is the first pwa study of @xmath16 baryon in @xmath0 hadronic decay in the world .
two s - wave @xmath16 baryon , namely @xmath19 and @xmath24 , are found in their @xmath25 decay mode .
the new information on @xmath26 couplings provides a new source for studying baryon structure .
the @xmath4 and @xmath27 are detected in their @xmath28 decay modes .
each candidate event is required to have two oppositely signed charged tracks with a good helix fit in the polar angle range @xmath29 in mdc and at least 2 reconstructed @xmath30 s in bsc .
a vertex is required within an interaction region @xmath31 cm longitudinally and 2 cm radially . a minimum energy cut of 60 mev is imposed on the photons .
showers associated with charged tracks are also removed .
after previous selection , we use tof information to identify the @xmath32 pairs , and at least one track with unambiguous tof information is required .
the open angle of two charged tracks smaller than @xmath33 is required in order to remove back to back events ; to remove radiative bhabha events , we require @xmath34 , where @xmath35 , @xmath36 ( @xmath37 , @xmath38 ) are the energy deposited in bsc and momentum of positron ( electron ) respectively .
events are fitted kinematically to the 4c hypotheses @xmath39 .
figure [ fig : gg ] shows the invariance mass spactrum of the @xmath40 , we can see the clear @xmath27 and @xmath4 signals .
meanwhile , the events are also fitted to @xmath41 and @xmath42 .
we require @xmath43 to reject the @xmath44 and @xmath45 backgrounds . in order to improve the mass resolution ,
5c fits are performed on the selected events , the extra constraints are those of the @xmath4 and @xmath27 masses for @xmath6 and @xmath46 decays , respectively .
@xmath47 ( @xmath48 ) is required .
figure [ fig : ppi0 ] and figure [ fig : peta ] show the @xmath49 and @xmath22 mass distributions from the decays @xmath1 , @xmath2 respectively .
clear peaks are observed around 1480 mev in @xmath49 invariant mass spectrum .
the @xmath22 events peak strongly in the neighborhood of @xmath4-production threshold , and we shall show that the data require a strong @xmath50 peak near the threshold . there is an additional obvious bump around 1600 - 1700mev , it favors @xmath7 in our @xmath51 ( @xmath52 ) partial wave analysis .
a pwa analysis is performed for the @xmath6 channel@xcite with the amplitudes constructed from lorentz - invariant combinations of the momenta and the photon polarization 4-vectors for @xmath0 initial states with helicity @xmath53 .
the relative magnitudes and phases of the amplitudes are determined by a maximum likelihood fit to the data .
based on the study of @xmath32 and @xmath22 invariant mass distributions in our data , the decay chain @xmath6 is analyzed taking into account two @xmath22(@xmath54 ) s - waves(@xmath51 ) and one @xmath22(@xmath54 ) p - wave(@xmath55 ) intermediate processes .
the two s - waves amplitudes are only used to fit the data in the low mass region near the @xmath4 production threshold . while the p - wave is used to fit the data in the high mass region .
the background from multi-@xmath27 is @xmath56 in the 5c fit , we have included a phase space background in the pwa fit to allow for this ; the @xmath22 mass projection fitted to the real data is shown in figure [ fig : peta ] .
we now discuss the features of the data and the outcome of fits .
a peak at @xmath57 1535 mev near the @xmath4 threshold optimises @xmath58 mev as shown in figure [ fig : fit](a ) , the data favour @xmath59 over @xmath60 .
a fit with @xmath61 instead gives @xmath62 worse by 16.0 than for @xmath63 assignment(our definition of @xmath64 is such that it increases by 0.5 for a one standard deviation change in one parameter ) . with our 4 fitted parameters , the statistical significance of the peak is above 6.0@xmath65 .
for the width scan as shown in figure [ fig : fit](b ) , our data require a width , @xmath66 mev .
our results for @xmath19 are consistent with the resonance parameters measured by krusche et al.@xcite at the mami acceletator in mainz on the @xmath4 photoproduction . at @xmath67 1650 mev ,
there is a further peak .
we fit it with a @xmath68 resonance .
figure [ fig : fit](c ) are the scan of mass .
its mass optimise at @xmath69 mev with @xmath70 mev fixed to pdg value .
we have tried fits to this peak with resonances having quantum numbers @xmath71 .
we find that log likelihood is better for @xmath63 than @xmath71 by 9.0 . with our 4 fitted parameters ,
the statistical significance of the peak is @xmath72 .
our results for @xmath24 are consistent with the parameters proposed by pdg .
a small improvement to the fit is given by including a @xmath73 resonance , which optimises at @xmath74 mev and @xmath75 mev fixed .
the statistical significance of the peak is only @xmath76 .
we have tried @xmath68 instead @xmath77 , but the fit is much worse .
in summary , we have studied the @xmath21 decay channel , and a pwa analysis is performed on the data .
there is a definite requirement for a @xmath78 component at @xmath79 mev with @xmath80 mev near the threshold for @xmath4 production .
in addition , there is an obvious @xmath7 resonance , with @xmath81 mev and @xmath82 mev fixed to pdg data . in the higher @xmath22 mass region , there is an evidence of @xmath83 signal around 1800 mev , we can not get any conclusion for this state due to the low statistics .
all above analysis is the first step for us to probe @xmath16 baryons at bes .
we will perform detail studies of @xmath16 baryons in the following @xmath0 decay channels : @xmath84 , @xmath85 , @xmath86 , @xmath87 , @xmath88 and so on .
one of the authors , h.b .
li , is grateful to prof .
leonard kisslinger for the helpful discussions .
this work is supported in part by chinese national science foundation under contract no .
19290401 and 19605007 . | nucleons common hadronic matter universe understanding internal structure insight real world important source excitation spectrum knowledge from partial - wave analyses @xmath15 charge exchange scattering data twenty years ago since late 1970 s little happened in experimental @xmath16 baryon spectroscopy importance for understanding baryon structure distinguishing pictures nonperturbative regime qcd new generation experiments n * with electromagnetic probes started at facilities cebaf jlab elsa bonn graal grenoble suggested study @xmath16 baryon in j@xmath17 decay baryon - antibaryon final states new laboratory study @xmath16 baryon mass range 1 - 2 gev @xmath18 excellent channel study @xmath19 state large decay branching ratio to @xmath20 other baryon resonances below 2.0 gev noted development quark shell model paper based on 7.8 million @xmath0 events bepc events @xmath1 @xmath2 selected reconstructed partial wave analysis on @xmath21 data full mass region @xmath22 first pwa study of @xmath16 baryon in @xmath0 hadronic decays - wave @xmath16 baryon @xmath25 decay mode new information @xmath26 couplings baryon structure @xmath4 @xmath27 @xmath28 decay modes candidate event two oppositely signed charged tracks good helix fit polar angle @xmath29 mdc 2 @xmath30 s bsc vertex interaction region @xmath31 cm longitudinally 2 cm radially minimum energy cut 60 mev photons showers removed tof information @xmath32 pairs one track unambiguous tof information required open angle two charged tracks smaller than @xmath33 required remove back to back events radiative bhabha events @xmath34 energy deposited bsc momentum positron electron events fitted kinematically to 4c hypotheses @xmath39 invariance mass spactrum @xmath40 clear @xmath27 @xmath4 signals events fitted to @xmath41 @xmath42 require @xmath43 reject @xmath44 @xmath45 backgrounds mass resolution 5c fits selected events extra constraints @xmath4 @xmath27 masses for @xmath6 decays @xmath47 @xmath48 ) requiredfigure peta show @xmath49 @xmath22 mass distributions from decays peaks around 1480 mev in @xmath49 invariant mass spectrum @xmath22 events peak @xmath4-production threshold data require @xmath50 peak near threshold additional bump around 1600 - 1700mev favors @xmath7 in @xmath51 partial wave analysis pwa analysis for @xmath6 channel@xcite amplitudes from - invariant momenta photon polarization 4-vectors for @xmath0 initial states @xmath53 relative magnitudes phases amplitudes determined by maximum likelihood fit data @xmath32 mass distributions decay chain @xmath6 analyzed two s - waves p - wave intermediate processes s - waves amplitudes low mass region near @xmath4 production threshold p - wave high mass region background from multi-@xmath27 is @xmath56 in 5c fit included phase space background in pwa fit @xmath22 mass projection to real data shown in peta discuss features data outcome of fitspeak at @xmath57 1535 mev threshold optimises @xmath58 mev data favour @xmath59 over @xmath60 fit with @xmath61 gives @xmath62 worse 16.0 @xmath63 assignment @xmath64 increases 0.5 for one standard deviation change 4 fitted parameters statistical significance peak above 6.0@xmath65 width scan data require @xmath66 mev results @xmath19 consistent with resonance parameters krusche et al. @xmath4 photoproduction @xmath67 1650 mev further peak fit with @xmath68 resonance mass optimise at @xmath69 mev @xmath70 mev fixed to pdg value tried fits with @xmath71 log likelihood better for @xmath63 than @xmath71 by 9.0 4 fitted parameters statistical significance peak is @xmath72 results @xmath24 consistent with parameters pdg small improvement @xmath73 resonance optimises at @xmath74 @xmath75 mev statistical significance peak only @xmath76 tried @xmath68 fit worse studied @xmath21 decay channel pwa analysisrequirement @xmath78 component at @xmath79 mev @xmath80 mev near threshold for @xmath4 production @xmath7 resonance @xmath81 @xmath82 mev fixed pdg data higher @xmath22 mass region evidence @xmath83 signal around 1800 mev conclusion low statistics analysis first step probe @xmath16 baryons at bes perform detail studies @xmath16 baryons @xmath0 decay channels @xmath84 h.b . li grateful prof . leonard kisslinger discussions supported by chinese national science foundation contract 19290401 19605007 | 0.315019 | 2,033 | 1,079 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,853 | we report on long - term k band photometry of the galactic microquasar grs 1915 + 105 since march 1999 .
we see variations of more than 1 mag , which are seemingly correlated with variations in x - ray intensity and spectral slope . | grs 1915 + 105 is the prototypical microquasar , a galactic x - ray binary ejecting plasma clouds at v@xmath00.92c ( mirabel & rodriguez 1994 ) .
three different sources of infrared ( ir ) radiation are expected from a x - ray binary , namely thermal emission from the outer part of accretion disk , thermal emission from the companion star or synchrotron emission from the jet(s ) .
previous ir observations of grs 1915 + 105 include , besides a few single measurements since 1993 , some few hrs photometry in conjunction with x - ray / radio measurements ( eikenberry 2000 ) , and a 2 month monitoring in 1996 ( bandyopadhyay 1998 ) .
k band observations have been performed with the 1.55-m telescope of the us naval observatory flagstaff equipped with the 256@xmath1256 pixel hgcdte ircam camera during 810 day intervals around full moon . because the main interest was in the long - term behaviour , `` only '' about 13 observations per month were done , consisting of groups of 3 or 4 individual observations per night .
each group represents a set of coadded integrations with an exposure of 400 sec . in total , observations were performed on 34 nights between 05 may 1999 and 15 jun 2000 .
these observations show grs 1915 + 105 to be variable between 12.1 k 13.7 mag ( not extinction - corrected ; fig .
1 ) . our long coverage allows to search for correlations with other emission characteristics , e.g. the rxte all - sky monitor ( asm ) quick - look results provided by the asm / rxte team . after selecting those k band observations which were done within 4 hrs of an asm scan
, we find that both the x - ray flux as well as the x - ray hardness ratio ( flux ratio of 512 kev vs. 35 kev band ) are positively correlated with the k band flux .
a regression analysis suggests that a doubling of the x - ray count rate ( flux ) leads to a 33% increase in the k band flux .
this argues against an explanation due to illumination of the secondary .
instead , it rather could be synchrotron radiation related to ( small ) ejections / flares as seen also at shorter time scales ( eikenberry 2000 ) . in this picture
the correlation of the k band flux with the x - ray hardness ratio is compatible with the correlation of x - ray spectral slope and radio flux found by rau & greiner ( 2001 ) . a large ( small ) value of the hardness ratio corresponds to a flat ( steep ) x - ray power law slope , and therefore a high ( low ) temperature of the electrons in the corona if the general comptonization paradigm is adopted .
these correlations then imply that strong k band flux and weak radio flux occur during times of a flat x - ray power law , i.e. most of the synchrotron power is radiated either in the infrared or radio band depending only on the temperature of electrons in the corona . | grs 1915 + 105 prototypical microquasar galactic x - ray binary ejecting plasma clouds at v@xmath00.92c mirabel rodriguez 1994 three sources infrared radiation expected from thermal emission accretion disk companion star synchrotron from jet previous ir observations of + 105 include since 1993 hrs photometry x - ray / radio measurements eikenberry 2000 2 month monitoring in 1996 bandyopadhyay 1998 k band observations performed with 1.55-m telescope us naval observatory flagstaff 256@xmath1256 pixel hgcdte ircam camera during 810 day intervals around full moon 13 observations per month 3 or 4 per each group exposure 400 sec observations 34 nights between 05 may 1999 and 15 jun 2000 show grs 1915 + 105 variable between 12.1 k 13.7 mag long coverage for correlations with emission characteristics rxte all - sky monitor k band observations within 4 hrs of asm scan x - ray flux hardness ratio positively correlated with k band flux regression analysis doubling x - ray count rate leads to 33% increase in k band fluxargues against explanation illumination secondary synchrotron radiation related small ejections flares shorter time scales eikenberry 2000 correlation k band flux x - ray hardness ratio compatible with x - ray spectral slope radio flux rau & greiner 2001 large value hardness ratio corresponds flat x - ray power law slope high temperature electrons corona comptonization paradigm correlations imply strong k band flux weak radio flux flat x - ray power law synchrotron power radiated infrared radio band depending temperature electrons corona | 0.133463 | 680 | 357 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
197,856 | we extend the scaling behaviour observed in the inclusive charged hadron transverse momentum ( @xmath0 ) distributions to the @xmath0 spectra of pions , kaons and protons produced in proton - proton ( @xmath1 ) collisions with center of mass energies ( @xmath2 ) at 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 tev .
this scaling behaviour arises when a linear transformation , @xmath3 , is applied on the pion , kaon or proton @xmath0 spectra .
the scaling parameter @xmath4 depends on @xmath2 and is determined by a new method , the quality factor method , which does not rely on the shape of the scaling function .
we argue that the pions , kaons and protons originate from different distributions of clusters which are formed by strings overlapping , and the scaling behaviours of these identified particles @xmath0 spectra could be understood with the colour string percolation model in a quantitative way simultaneously . | one of the most important observations in high energy collisions is the @xmath0 spectra for different species of final state particles . from the spectra , we can learn a lot about the regularities of the particle productions .
in many studies , searching for a scaling behaviour of the @xmath0 spectra is helpful to reveal these regularities . in @xcite , the authors showed a scaling behaviour in the pion @xmath0 spectra with different collision centralities at midrapidity in au+au collisions at the relativistic heavy ion collider ( rhic ) .
this scaling behaviour was extended to noncentral regions in au+au and d+au collisions @xcite .
similar scaling behaviours were found in the proton and anti - proton @xmath0 spectra with different collision centralities at midrapidity in au+au collisions at rhic @xcite .
recently , we observed a scaling behaviour in the @xmath0 spectra of inclusive charged hadrons in proton - proton ( proton - antiproton ) collisions at @xmath2 = 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 ( 0.63 , 1.8 and 1.96 ) tev when a linear transformation , @xmath5 , was applied on these spectra @xcite .
here the scaling parameter @xmath4 depends on the collision energy @xmath2 .
this scaling behaviour was explained by the colour string percolation model in a qualitative way . in this paper
, we will extend this scaling behaviour to the @xmath0 spectra of pions , kaons and protons produced in @xmath1 collisions at 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 tev . a new method , the quality factor method @xcite , will be adopted in the searching for the scaling parameter @xmath4 . compared with the method utilized in @xcite , this method does not rely on the shape of the scaling function ,
thus it is more robust .
we will argue that the pions , kaons and protons originate from different distributions of clusters which are formed by strings overlapping , and the colour string percolation model can describe the scaling behaviours of the identified @xmath0 spectra not only in a qualitative way but also in a quantitative way simultaneously . as a similar geometrical scaling behaviour
was suggested when the @xmath0 spectra of identified particles in @xmath1 collisions at 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 tev were presented in terms of a scaling variable @xmath6 , where @xmath7 gev / c and @xmath8 is around 0.27 @xcite , we would like to compare the scaling behaviours presented in @xmath9 and @xmath10 .
the organization of the paper is as follows . in section [ sec : method ] , we will illustrate the procedure to search for the scaling behaviours in the @xmath0 spectra of identified particles . in section [ sec : scaling_behaviour ] , the scaling behaviours of pions , kaons and protons will be described .
section [ sec : comp ] shows the comparison between the scaling behaviours presented in the variables @xmath9 and @xmath10 . in section [ sec : mechanism ] , we will use the colour string percolation model to explain the scaling behaviours of the identified particles in a quantitative way .
finally , the conclusion is made in section [ sec : conclusion ] .
as done in @xcite , we will search for the scaling behaviours of the identified pion , kaon and proton @xmath0 spectra with the following steps .
let us take the pion @xmath0 spectra as an example , we define a scaling variable , @xmath11 , and a scaled @xmath0 spectra , @xmath12 . here
the parameters @xmath4 and @xmath13 depend on the collision energy . by choosing proper @xmath4 and @xmath13
, the data points of the pion @xmath0 spectra in @xmath1 collisions at 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 tev will migrate into one curve . as a convention
, we usually set both @xmath4 and @xmath13 of the highest energy collisions to be 1 .
however , the @xmath0 coverages of the pion spectra at 0.9 and 7 tev are much smaller than the coverage at 2.76 tev . in order to make the scaling function @xmath14 to describe the pion spectra in the large @xmath0 region faithfully , we choose both @xmath4 and @xmath13 for the collisions at 2.76 tev as 1 . with different choices of @xmath4 and @xmath13 , the scaling functions @xmath14 are different . in order
to get rid of this arbitrariness , we introduce another scaling variable , @xmath15 , and the corresponding normalized scaling function @xmath16 . here
the ways to search for the scaling behaviours in the @xmath0 spectra of kaons and protons are identical to the one for pions .
in this paper , the @xmath0 spectra of identified pions , kaons and protons in @xmath1 collisions at 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 tev were published by the alice collaboration @xcite . here
the identified pion , kaon and proton @xmath0 spectra refer to the spectra of @xmath18 , @xmath19 and @xmath20 .
the data at 2.76 tev cover a pion @xmath0 range of 0.1 - 20.0 gev / c , which is much wider than the ones at 0.9 and 7 tev , 0.1 - 2.6 gev / c and 0.1 - 3.0 gev / c .
similar results are obtained in the comparison among the kaon or proton @xmath0 ranges at 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 tev . as described in section [
sec : method ] , both the parameters @xmath4 and @xmath13 at 2.76 tev are set as 1 , thus the scaling function @xmath14 is nothing but the @xmath0 spectra of pions , kaons or protons at this energy . in @xcite , @xmath14 is written in the tsallis form , in which the mass effect of the charged hadron is ignored . in this work , since the threshold of the @xmath0 range is 0.1 ( 0.1 and 0.1 ) gev / c at 2.76 tev @xcite , which is below the mass of pions ( kaons and protons ) 0.14 ( 0.494 and 0.938 ) gev / c@xmath21 @xcite , we write the scaling function @xmath14 for pions , kaons or protons with the modified tsallis form @xmath22^{\frac{1}{1-q } } , \label{eq : phi_z_pt_spectrum_pp}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 are free parameters , @xmath26 is the mass of the particle species , and @xmath27 is a measure of the non - extensivity .
these free parameters are given by fitting equation to the @xmath0 spectra of identified species at 2.76 tev with the least @xmath28s method .
the square root of the sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data points has been taken into account in these fits .
lists the parameters @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 as well as their uncertainties returned by the fits .
the last line of this table shows the @xmath29s per degrees of freedom ( dof ) , named reduced @xmath28s , for these fits .
.[tab : id_particles_fit_parameters ] the parameters @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 of the scaling functions @xmath14 for pions , kaons and protons .
the uncertainties quoted are due to the statistical plus systematic errors of the data points added in quadrature .
the last line shows the reduced @xmath28s for the fits on the @xmath0 spectra of identified particles at 2.76 tev . [ cols="^,^,^,^ " , ] upper panel : the scaling behaviour of the pion @xmath0 spectra presented in @xmath9 for @xmath1 collisions at 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 tev .
the solid curve is described by the csp fit in equation with parameters in the second column of .
the data points are taken from @xcite .
lower panel : the @xmath30 distribution as a function of @xmath9 for pions . ]
now we would like to seek for the reason why the csp model can describe the scaling behaviour of the identified @xmath0 spectra . under the transformation @xmath31 , @xmath32 and @xmath33 , both @xmath34 and @xmath35 are invariant .
so the @xmath0 spectra of identified particles in equation are also invariant .
this invariance is the scaling behaviour we are looking for . comparing the @xmath36 transformation in the csp model @xmath37 with the one used to search for
the scaling behaviour @xmath38 , we know that @xmath4 is proportional to @xmath39 . as described in @xcite , @xmath40 , where the average is taken over all clusters for identified particles , thus @xmath4 should be proportional to @xmath41 .
since the degree of string overlap @xmath42 grows with energy , the scaling parameter @xmath4 should also increase with energy .
that s indeed what we see for the identified particles in the third column of .
therefore the csp model can explain the scaling behaviours presented in @xmath9 for pions , kaons and protons separately .
however , the rate of the @xmath4 values increasing with energy for pions is different with the one for kaons or protons .
this could also be explained by the csp model .
as @xmath43 , and the values of @xmath44 are the same for pions ( kaons or protons ) at 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 tev , the ratio between the values of @xmath4 at different energies should be equal to the ratio between the values of @xmath45 at different energies .
@xmath45 is evaluated in terms of the csp model as @xcite @xmath46 the cluster fragmentation functions @xmath47 are the same for pions ( kaons or protons ) at different energies .
however , the cluster s size distributions @xmath34 are different for different particles , which can be seen from the comparison among the @xmath48 values for pions , kaons and protons in . as a result , for different species of particles , the values of @xmath4 change in a different rate with energy . in a summary , the csp model could be utilized to explain the scaling behaviours presented in @xmath9 for the identified particles simultaneously .
in this paper , we have extended the scaling behaviour in the inclusive charged hadron @xmath0 spectra to the spectra of identified particles at 0.9 , 2.76 and 7 tev .
this scaling behaviour is exhibited when @xmath0 is replaced by @xmath11 .
the scaling parameter @xmath4 is determined by the quality factor method , which does not rely on the shape of the scaling function .
we have argued that the pions , kaons and protons originate from different distributions of clusters formed by strings overlapping , and the scaling behaviours of these identified particles could be explained by the colour string percolation model in a quantitative way at the same time .
the author would like to thank prof . c. b. yang at central china normal university for valuable discussions .
this work was supported by the fundamental research funds for the central universities of china under grant no .
gk201502006 , by the scientific research foundation for the returned overseas chinese scholars , state education ministry , and by the national natural science foundation of china under grant nos .
11447024 and 11505108 .
00 hwa r c and yang c b 2003 _ phys . rev .
lett . _ * 90 * 212301 .
zhu l l and yang c b 2007 _ phys .
c _ * 75 * 044904 .
zhang w c , zeng y , nie w x , zhu l l and yang c b 2007 _ phys .
c _ * 76 * 044910 .
zhang w c and yang c b 2014 _ j. phys .
g : nucl . part .
phys . _ * 41 * 105006 .
gelis f et al .
2007 _ phys .
b _ * 647 * 376 - 379 .
beuf g et al .
2008 _ phys .
d _ * 78 * 074004 .
praszalowicz m 2013 _ phys .
b _ * 727 * 461 - 467 .
aamodt k et al .
( alice collaboration ) 2011 _ eur .
j. c _ * 71 * 1655 .
abelev b et al .
( alice collaboration ) 2014 _ phys .
b _ * 736 * 196 - 207 .
adam j et al .
( alice collaboration ) 2015 _ eur .
j. c _ * 75 * 226 .
olive k a et al .
( particle data group ) 2014 _ chin .
c _ * 38 * 090001 .
khandai p k et al .
2013 _ int .
* 28 * 1350066 .
praszalowicz m 2011 _ phys .
lett . _ * 106 * 142002 .
cunqueiro l et al .
2008 _ eur .
phys . j. c _ * 53 * 585 - 589 .
dias de deus j et al .
2005 _ eur .
j. c _ * 41 * 229 - 241 .
schwinger j 1951 _ phys .
rev . _ * 82 * 664 .
braun m a et al .
2015 _ phys .
rep . _ * 599 * 1 - 50 .
dias de deus j and pajares c 2006 _ phys .
b _ * 642 * 455 - 458 . | important high energy collisions @xmath0 spectra for final state particles regularities particle productions searching for scaling behaviour spectra regularities showed scaling behaviour pion @xmath0 spectra different collision centralities midrapidity au+au collisions at relativistic heavy ion collider extended to noncentral regions au+au d+au collisions similar in proton anti - proton @xmath0 spectra different collision centralities midrapidity collisions rhic observed scaling behaviour in @xmath0 spectra of inclusive charged hadrons in proton - proton collisions at @xmath2 = 0.9 2.76 7 ( 1.96 ) tev linear transformation @xmath5 applied scaling parameter @xmath4 depends on collision energy explained by colour string percolation model scaling to @xmath0 spectra of pions kaons protons @xmath1 collisions at 0.9 2.76 7 tev new method quality factor method @xcite adopted searching for scaling parameter @xmath4 rely on shape scaling function more robustargue pions kaons protons originate from different distributions clusters formed strings overlapping colour string percolation model scaling behaviours @xmath0 spectra qualitative quantitative similar geometrical scaling behaviour suggested @xmath0 spectra @xmath1 collisions at 0.9 2.76 7 tev presented scaling variable @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 around 0.27 compare scaling behaviours in @xmath9 @xmath10 organization paper section method illustrate procedure search for scaling behaviours in @xmath0 spectra section scaling_behaviour behaviours pions kaons protons described section comp comparison scaling behaviours @xmath9 @xmath10 mechanism use colour string percolation model explain scaling behaviours conclusion section sec conclusion ] search for scaling behaviours pion kaon proton @xmath0 spectra pion @xmath0 spectra example define scaling variable @xmath11 scaled @xmath0 spectra @xmath12 parameters @xmath4 @xmath13 depend on collision energy choosing proper @xmath4 @xmath13 data points pion @xmath0 spectra @xmath1 collisions at 0.9 2.76 7 tev migrate into one curveset @xmath4 @xmath13 highest energy collisions 1 @xmath0 coverages pion spectra at 0.9 7 tev smaller than 2.76 tev scaling function @xmath14 pion spectra choose @xmath4 collisions at 2.76 tev as 1 different choices scaling functions different introduce scaling variable @xmath15 normalized scaling function @xmath16 scaling behaviours @xmath0 spectra of kaons protons identical to pions spectra pions kaons protons collisions at 0.9 2.76 7 tev published by alice collaboration @xcite proton spectra refer to @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 data at 2.76 tev cover pion @xmath0 range 0.1 - 20.0 gev / c wider than at 0.9 7 tev 0.1 - 2.6 - 3.0 similar results comparison kaon proton @xmath0 ranges at 0.9 2.76 7 tev parameters @xmath4 @xmath13 at 2.76 tev set as 1 scaling function @xmath14 @xmath0 spectra of pions kaons protons energy @xcite @xmath14 written in tsallis form mass effect charged hadron ignoredthreshold @xmath0 range 0.1 ) gev / c at 2.76 tev @xcite below mass pions kaons protons ) 0.14 ( 0.494 0.938 ) gev / c@xmath21 write scaling function @xmath14 for pions kaons protons modified tsallis form @xmath22 @xmath23 free parameters @xmath26 mass particle species @xmath27 measure non - extensivity free parameters fitting equation @xmath0 spectra species at 2.76 tev least @xmath28s method square root sum statistical systematic uncertainties data points fits parameters @xmath23 uncertainties returned fits last line shows @xmath29s per degrees freedom reduced @xmath28s for fits_particles_fit_parameters parameters @xmath23 scaling functions @xmath14 for pions kaons protons uncertainties due to statistical systematic errors data points last line shows reduced @xmath28s for fits @xmath0 spectra particles at 2.76 tevcols="^ upper panel scaling behaviour pion @xmath0 spectra @xmath9 @xmath1 collisions at 0.9 2.76 7 tev solid curve described csp fit equation parameters second column data points from @xcite lower panel @xmath30 distribution function @xmath9 for pions reason csp model scaling behaviour identified @xmath0 spectra transformation @xmath31 @xmath34 @xmath35 invariant @xmath0 spectra identified particles equation invariant invariance scaling behaviour comparing @xmath36 transformation csp model @xmath37 scaling behaviour @xmath38 @xmath4 proportional to @xmath39 @xcite @xmath40 average clusters @xmath4 proportional to @xmath41 string overlap @xmath42 grows with energy scaling parameter @xmath4 increase with energy identified particles third column csp model explain scaling behaviours @xmath9 for pions kaons protons rate @xmath4 values increasing with energy for pions different kaons protons explained by csp model@xmath43 @xmath44 same for pions protons at 0.9 2.76 7 tev ratio @xmath4 at different energies should equal to @xmath45 @xmath45 evaluated csp model as @xcite @xmath46 cluster fragmentation functions @xmath47 same for pions at different energies cluster size distributions @xmath34 different for different particles comparison @xmath48 values for pions kaons protons different values @xmath4 change different with energy csp model explain scaling behaviours @xmath9 for identified particles extended scaling behaviour inclusive charged hadron @xmath0 spectra to particles at 0.9 2.76 7 tev scaling behaviour exhibited when @xmath0 replaced by @xmath11 scaling parameter @xmath4 determined by quality factor method not rely on shape scaling function pions kaons protons originate from different distributions clusters scaling behaviours explained by colour string percolation model prof . c. b. yang central china normal university discussions work supported by fundamental research funds for central universities china grant scientific research foundation for chinese state education ministry national natural science foundation china11447024 11505108 hwa r yang 2003 phys . 90 * 212301 zhu l yang 2007 phys 75 * 044904 zhang zeng y nie w x zhu l l yang 2007 76 * 044910 zhang yang 2014 41 * 105006 gelis f 2007 phys 647 * 376 - 379 beuf g 2008 phys 78 * 074004 praszalowicz m 2013 727 * 461 - 467 aamodt k alice collaboration 2011 71 * 1655 abelev b 2014 phys 736 * 196 - 207 adam j alice collaboration 2015 75 * 226 olive k a particle data group 2014 38 * 090001 khandai p k 2013 28 * 1350066 praszalowicz 2011 phys 106 * 142002 cunqueiro l 2008 phys . 53 * 585 - 589 dias de deus j 2005 41 * 229 - 241 schwinger j 1951 phys . rev 82 * 664 braun m a 2015 phys . 599 * 1 - 50 dias de deus j pajares c 2006455 - 458 | 0.494804 | 3,159 | 1,694 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,861 | the star experiment uses polarized p+p collisions at rhic to determine the contributions to the spin of the proton from gluon spin and from orbital angular momentum of the quarks and gluons .
selective star measurements of the longitudinal double spin asymmetry for inclusive jet and inclusive hadron production are presented here . in addition
, we report measurements of the transverse spin asymmetry for di - jet production at mid - rapidity and the transverse single - spin asymmetry for forward @xmath0 production .
the quark and anti - quark contributions to the spin of the proton measured with polarized deep - inelastic scattering ( dis ) fixed target experiments amount to only @xmath1 @xcite .
consequently , the rest of the spin of the proton must come from the gluons and the orbital angular momentum of both quarks and gluons .
however , the gluon polarization , @xmath2 , is poorly constrained from scaling violations in the dis data @xcite , and more precise and direct measurements are needed .
polarized p+p collisions at the relativistic heavy ion collider ( rhic ) provide a very suitable environment , rich with strongly interacting probes , to measure @xmath2 directly and precisely .
there are many processes where the gluon participates directly .
in addition , the high c.m . energy , @xmath3 = 200 gev , and high @xmath4 make next - to - leading order ( nlo ) perturbative quantum chromodynamics ( pqcd ) analysis more reliable .
the spin program of the solenoid tracker at rhic ( star ) experiment @xcite aims , in the short term , to utilize these advantages to measure @xmath2 using inclusive jet and inclusive hadron production measurements in longitudinally polarized p+p collisions .
in addition , the star experiment uses transversely polarized p+p collisions to gain insights into the orbital angular momentum of the partons .
the star collaboration previously observed a sizable analyzing power , @xmath5 , for forward @xmath0 production at large @xmath6 @xcite , similar to previous observations at lower energies @xcite .
the previous star results were in qualitative agreement with several different model predictions @xcite and could not differentiate between them , so higher precision measurements of @xmath5 as a function of both @xmath6 and @xmath4 were needed .
new @xmath5 measurements with higher luminosity and polarization were performed in 2006 @xcite .
figure [ fig : anvxfnpt ] shows preliminary results for @xmath5 as a function of @xmath6 ( left panel ) and as a function of @xmath4 for different @xmath6 bins ( right panel ) , along with model predictions .
the results in the left panel are consistent with the previous results @xcite in having large @xmath5 for high @xmath6 , and provide sufficient accuracy to discriminate between different dynamics .
the right panel shows that the @xmath4 dependence of @xmath5 is not well described by sivers based calculations @xcite , which predict that @xmath5 should decrease as you go higher in @xmath4 for all @xmath6 bins .
the star experiment also probed the sivers effect by measuring the di - jet opening angle in transversely polarized p+p collisions @xcite since boer and vogelsang @xcite suggested that @xmath5 for the distribution in relative azimuthal angle , @xmath7 , between the di - jet pairs could provide r95 mm access to the sivers effect @xcite .
figure [ fig : dijetsivers ] shows preliminary results from 2006 data for @xmath5 , for both beams , as a function of @xmath8 , where @xmath9 and @xmath10 are the psuedorapidities for the two jets .
the measurement was done over @xmath11 $ ] and for @xmath12 .
@xmath5 is extracted from the cross ratio of the spin - sorted @xmath7 distribution in which `` left '' and `` right '' yields were deduced from @xmath13 and @xmath14 , respectively .
@xmath15 , shown in figure [ fig : dijetsivers ] , are consistent with zero - much smaller than the sivers asymetry that was observed in semi - inclusive deep inelastic scattering ( sidis ) by hermes @xcite .
+ the star collaboration uses the measurement of the longitudinal double spin asymmetry , @xmath16 , for inclusive jet and inclusive hadron production to constrain @xmath2 .
@xmath16 is directly sensitive to the polarized gluon distribution function in the proton through gluon - gluon and gluon - quark sub - processes @xcite .
we reported the unpolarized inclusive jet cross section from data taken in 2003 and 2004 @xcite , and preliminary results for the unpolarized inclusive @xmath17 cross section @xcite , and both show satisfactory agreement with nlo pqcd calculations over many orders of magnitude .
the agreement suggests the applicability of pqcd to describe the polarization observables in this kinematic region . left panel : @xmath16 for inclusive @xmath0 production with statistical errors and the systematic band .
right panel : mean momentum fraction of the @xmath0 in their associated jet as a function of @xmath4 and the corresponding mean jet @xmath4 .
the data points are not corrected for jet acceptance or reconstruction efficiency . ]
left panel : @xmath16 for inclusive @xmath0 production with statistical errors and the systematic band .
right panel : mean momentum fraction of the @xmath0 in their associated jet as a function of @xmath4 and the corresponding mean jet @xmath4 .
the data points are not corrected for jet acceptance or reconstruction efficiency . ] in figure [ fig : allpi0nz ] , the left panel , we present preliminary results of the first star @xmath16 measurement of inclusive @xmath0 production at mid - rapidity with statistical errors and the systematics band @xcite .
the systematics band does not include the normalization uncertainty due to the polarization measurement .
in addition to the grsv standard curve , which is based on the best fit to dis data , different @xmath2 scenarios from maximally positive to maximally negative and passing zero @xmath2 are also shown in this and the following figures @xcite .
this measurement is consistent with previously reported @xmath16 for inclusive jets @xcite in disfavoring the maximum positive @xmath2 .
the right panel shows the mean momentum fraction carried by the @xmath0 in its associated jet .
this plot shows that the @xmath0 carries a very large fraction , 70% , of its associated jet momentum .
corrections for jet acceptance and reconstruction efficiency may reduce this fraction by @xmath18 .
preliminary results from 2005 of very promising @xmath16 measurements of inclusive @xmath19 and @xmath20 are shown in figure [ fig : allplusmin ] @xcite .
the error bars are statistical errors , and the associated bands indicate the systematics , which do nt include the scale uncertainty due to the polarization measurement .
several @xmath2 scenarios for these processes are also shown .
the ordering of the measurements of @xmath16 between @xmath19 and @xmath20 is sensitive to the sign of @xmath2 . for now , this measurement is limited by statistics .
we are currently working on 2006 data where we have higher luminosity and polarization .
fig .
[ fig : alljets ] shows @xmath16 for inclusive jet production versus jet @xmath4 .
the solid points are preliminary results from 2005 data and the open circles are from 2003 + 2004 data analysis @xcite , both with statistical error bars .
the dark and hatched bands show the systematic uncertainties for 2005 and combined 2003 and 2004 data , respectively .
these bands do not include scale uncertainties due to the beam polarization .
fig .
[ fig : alljets ] also shows several grsv nlo pqcd scenarios for inclusive jets .
the data are consistent with zero or small gluon polarization and exclude the maximally positive gluon polarization scenario .
in fact , these 2005 results go further in excluding much of the region in between maximally positive gluon polarization and dis based fit scenarios , and thus put a tighter constraint on @xmath2 . in addition
, the star collaboration studied longitudinal spin transfer of @xmath21 in polarized p+p collisions@xcite and inclusive @xmath0 production using the star endcap calorimeter as proof of principle measurements in 2005 .
in summary , we reported on preliminary di - jet sivers @xmath5 measurement from 2006 , and all measured @xmath5 are statistically consistent with zero , several factors smaller than expected from sidis . in addition , we reported on 2006 @xmath5 measurements of forward @xmath0 with higher statistics and polarization , which show inconsistency with twist-3 / sivers calculations ; @xmath5 does not decrease with @xmath4 in all @xmath6 bins . in the longitudinal spin program , we reported on several preliminary @xmath16 measurements of inclusive hadrons and jets at mid - rapidity from 2005 data .
the results are consistent in the region of kinematic overlap and provide improved constraints on the gluon spin contribution to the proton spin .
they exclude large and positive gluon spin contributions . | 20 filippone b w and ji x d 2001 _ adv .
phys . _ * 26 * 1 gehrmann t and stirling w j 1996 _ phys .
_ d * 53 * 6100 ackermann k h _ et al . _
( star collaboration ) 2003 _ nucl .
meth . _ a * 499 * 624 adams j _ et al . _
( star collaboration ) 2004 _ phys .
lett . _ * 92 * 171801 adams d l _ et al .
_ 1991 _ phys .
_ b * 264 * 462 nogach l ( star collaboration ) 2006 _ preprint _ hep - ex/0612030 anselmino m , dalesio u , melis s and murgia f 2006 _ phys .
_ d * 74 * 094011 ; dalesio u and murgia f _ private communications _ kouvaris c , qiu j , vogelsang w and yuan f 2006 _ preprint _ hep - ph/0609238 balewski j ( star collaboration ) 2006 _ preprint _ hep - ex/0612036 boer d and vogelsang w 2004 _ phys .
_ d * 69 * 094025 vogelsang w and yuan f 2005 _ phys .
_ d * 72 * 054028 dienfenthaler m ( hermes collaboration ) 2006 _ preprint _ hep - ex/0507013 jager b _ et al .
_ 2004 _ phys .
_ d * 70 * 034010 abelev b i _ et al . _ ( star collaboration ) 2006 _ phys .
lett . _ * 97 * 252001 .
simon f ( star collaboration ) 2006 _ preprint _ hep - ex/0612004 jager b , schafer a , stratmann m and vogelsang w 2003 _ phys . rev .
_ d * 67 * 054005 ; pumplin j _ et al .
_ 2002 _ j. high energy phys . _
* 0207 * 012 kocoloski a ( star collaboration ) 2006 _ preprint _ hep - ex/0612005 xu q h ( star collaboration ) 2006 _ preprint _ hep - ex/0612035 | filippone b ji x d 2001 phys 26 gehrmann stirling w 1996 53 * 6100 ackermann k star collaboration 2003 499 * 624 adams j star collaboration 2004 92 171801 adams d 1991 264 * 462 nogach star collaboration 2006 hep - ex/0612030 anselmino dalesio u melis s murgia f 2006 74 * 094011 dalesio murgia private communications kouvaris c qiu j vogelsang w yuan f 2006 ph/0609238 balewski j star collaboration 2006 - ex/0612036 boer d vogelsang w 2004 69 094025 vogelsang yuan f 2005 72 054028 dienfenthaler hermes collaboration 2006 hep - ex/0507013 jager b 2004 70 * 034010 abelev b star collaboration 2006 97 252001 simon f star collaboration 2006 hep - ex/0612004 jager b schafer stratmann m vogelsang w 2003 phys 67 * 054005 pumplin j 2002 high energy phys . 0207 012 kocoloski star collaboration 2006 hep - ex/0612005 xu ex/0612035 | 0.074994 | 522 | 297 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
197,875 | we consider a mixed chaotic hamiltonian system and compare classical with quantum chaos . as alternative to the methods of energy level spacing statistics and trace formulas
, we construct a quantum action and a quantum analogue phase space to analyse quantum chaos . | this paper is about the use of the quantum action@xcite in physics .
let us start out by discussing some possible areas of application .
* high energy physics * + _ renormalisation_. the quantum action may turn out to provide a new definition of renormalisation . in conventional terminology , renormalisation means to extract physical observable parameters like mass , coupling etc . obtained from an interacting quantum field theory at the continuum limit .
those physical parameters differ from the so - called bare parameters and this difference represents the effects of the interaction . very similar to this , the quantum action has parameters ( mass , potential parameters ) different from the classical action and this difference represents the effects of quantum mechanics : q.m .
fluctuations occuring in the path integral are represented by a single path , however , for a particle with different properties of mass and interaction . in order to explore the use of the quantum action as means of renormalisation
, one could construct the quantum action for a many - body system ( like a chain of coupled anharmonic oscillators ) and explore its quantum mechanical continuum limit . in quantum field theory ,
one carries out renormalisation by computing n - point vertex functions , which represent vacuum - to - vacuum transition amplitudes for transition time @xmath0 . in the same time
limit , the existence of the quantum action has been proven rigorously in q.m .
, although so far only in the case of a single particle system .
+ _ cosmology and inflationary scenario of early universe_. inflation involves potentials with several minima and instanton solutions .
the instanton starts out as a quantum instanton and eventually turns into a classical instanton .
this has effects on the subsequent formation of galaxies@xcite .
using the effective potential or the quantum potential ( potential of the quantum action ) in general creates a potential different from the classical one .
in particular , it may have minima being absent in the classical potential .
consequently , this may create instantons being quite different from the classical instanton . in ref.@xcite instantons from the quantum action
were found to be `` softer '' than the corresponding classical instanton .
such quantum effects of the instanton may influence the outcome of the galaxy formation at the end of inflation .
+ _ hot and dense nuclear matter_. instantons are believed to play an important role in hot nuclear matter in the quark - gluon plasma phase@xcite .
instantons are important also for the mechanism of chiral symmetry breaking and for thoofts solution of the u(1 ) problem .
+ _ neutrino oscillations_. the process of oscillations of neutrino flavors@xcite may have to do with a process of tunneling in a potential with degenerate minima . *
condensed matter physics * + _ quantum dots , semi - conductor and quantum chaos_. advancing the speed of microprocessors may have technological obstacles but also physical limits . when reducing the size of a chip one
soon may enter the regime where quantum laws rule .
quantum chaos may become a very important issue , because it can hamper the flow of electric currents .
the quantitative determination of quantum chaos effects will possibly be of great importance for the development of future microprocessors . by use of some kind of effective action or the quantum action , one can study quantum corrals formed by atoms and quantum dots in semi - conductors .
in particular , this allows to study the temperature dependence of electron dynamics in atomic corrals , as well as for electrons moving in simple conductor - semiconductor - isolator geometries and to search for the possible presence of quantum chaos .
+ _ josephson junctions and superconducting quantum interference_. superconducting quantum interference devices ( squid ) have been used to demonstrate experimentally the phenomenon of quantum superposition in macroscopic states@xcite .
this involves josephson junctions .
the squid potential has a double - well structure .
the effective potential and the quantum potential should be useful tools to analyze quantum superposition in terms of such potential involving quantum effects .
+ _ quantum computers based on superconductors_. the symmetry of the order parameter in some triplet superconductors corrersponds to doubly degenerate chiral states .
gulian et al.@xcite predict that this degeneracy can be lifted via macroscopic quantum tunneling .
instanton - like quantum behavior may become important .
triplet superconducters may be used as basic elements of quantum computers . again the effective potential and the quantum potential should help to study quantum instantons and tunneling in such materials . *
atomic physics * + _ analogy of classical chaos in quantum physics_. attempts have been made to use the effective action in order to characterize chaotic behavior in quantum systems@xcite . in a a similar way
, the quantum action has been used also@xcite .
this allows to construct of a phase space portrait and poincar sections for a quantum system in analogy to classical physics . from this one
can obtain lyapunov exponents and kam surfaces for the quantum system .
a potentially quite interesting system to explore is the paul trap .
+ _ ultracold atoms in a billard formed by lasers_. trace formulas ( gutzwiller@xcite and generalisations ) have been used successfully@xcite to establish a relation between level densities and periodic semi - classical orbits .
it would be interesting to compare predictions of trace formulas in the semi - classical regime with the predictions obtained from the effective action or the quantum action .
+ _ dynamical tunneling_. steck et al.@xcite and hensinger et al.@xcite have demonstrated experimentally the phenomenon of dynamical tunneling ( where the classical transition is forbidden due to some conserved quantity different from energy ) .
it has been realized by arrays of cold atoms .
it has been observed that the presence of quantum chaos enhances the dynamical tunneling transition .
it would be instructive to reexamine dynamical tunneling using the phase space portrait constructed from a time - dependent effective action or quantum action .
* chemistry * + _ binding of macromolecules_. in the process of chemical binding of macromolecules , often a double well potential plays a role .
the effective action as well as the quantum action should be useful to find pathways in the formation of such macromolecules .
this paper is focussed on the quantum action@xcite .
we discuss some of its analytical properties .
we present results of numerical computations testing the goodness of the quantum action in fitting transition amplitudes . as a physical application we address the topic of quantum chaos , occuring in nuclear physics and atomic physics , from the viewpoint of the quantum action .
the quantum action parametrizes quantum transition amplitudes @xmath1 in terms of a new action @xmath2 defined by @xmath3/\hbar ] \nonumber \\ & & \tilde{s}[x ] = \int_{0}^{t } dt \frac{1}{2 } \tilde{m } \dot{x}^{2 } - \tilde{v}[x ] ~ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath2 is a local action - the so called quantum action and @xmath4 is the classical trajectory of such action going from boundary point @xmath5 to @xmath6 .
for some potentials there may be multiple trajectories connecting those boundary points , then there is a sum over all trajectories .
@xmath7 is a normalisation factor .
one should note that the existence of such quantum action in general has not been proven yet . as an operational definition of the quantum action
, one may consider it as that action which gives the optimal fit of the transition amplitudes @xmath1 for all combinations of boundary points , for a fixed transition time . often such optimal fit using only a single trajectory is already very good , as can be seen in examples below . in the limit of large ( imaginary ) transition time
the quantum action has been proven rigorously to exist , giving an exact parametrisation of transition amplitudes@xcite .
the quantum action being local allows to construct a portrait of phase space of a quantum system by applying the tools of nonlinear dynamics to this action@xcite . in particular
, it allows to construct poincar sections and lyapunov exponents , in analogy to classical nonlinear dynamics ( note that the definition of lyapunov exponents requires the limit @xmath0 ) . , @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( full line ) , quantum potential ( dashed line ) and ground state wave function ( enhanced by factor 5 , dotted line ) . ]
consider the schrdinger equation in imaginary time ( @xmath10 ) with a given time - independent hamiltonian @xmath11 .
then the transition amplitude evolves according to @xmath12 < \psi_{n}|x_{in } > \nonumber \\ & = & \sim_{t \to \infty } ~ < x_{fi}|\psi_{gr } > \exp[-e_{gr}t/\hbar ] < \psi_{gr}|x_{in } > ~ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the large time limit ( feynman - kac limit ) the transition amplitude is projected onto the ground state contribution
. this may give the impression that for large time most of the physical information is lost .
however , this is not true .
the stationary schrdinger equation allows to reconstruct the potential @xmath13 mass from the ground state @xmath14 the mass can be reconstructed from the groundstate plus any one ( e.g. lowest ) of the excited states , @xmath15 in other words , all information on the hamiltonian is stored in the wave functions and energies of any two eigen states .
this is to some extent analogous to biology , where the genetic code is stored in all cells . similar to eq.([eq : psiclasspot ] ) there is a relation between the ground state and the quantum potential , proven in ref.@xcite , @xmath16 where @xmath17 denotes the minimum value of the quantum potential . in @xmath18 dimension
, this allows to express the wave function in terms of the quantum potential and quantum mass @xmath19 ~ .\ ] ] this expression holds in the case when the classical potential is parity symmetric , has a single minimum at @xmath20 and the ground state wave function a single maximum at @xmath20 .
the formula can be generalized to multi - valley potentials .
now we will establish a differential equation relating the classical potential to the quantum potential . defining @xmath21 the combination of eqs.([eq : psiclasspot],[eq : psiquantpot],[eq : defu ] ) yields
@xmath22 this is a riccati - type differential equation to determine the function @xmath23 when @xmath24 is given .
in @xmath18 it can be expressed more explicitely by @xmath25 ( bottom ) , @xmath26 ( center ) and @xmath27 ( top ) as function of transition time @xmath28 .
classical parameters @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 . ]
in @xmath18 ideas from supersymmetry have been used to improve the computation of tunneling amplitudes@xcite . for a given potential
, there is a supersymmetric partner potential , which yields the same spectrum as the original potential , except for the ground state .
consider a hamiltonian of the form ( taking @xmath32 ) , @xmath33 there is a supersymmetric partner potential @xmath34 , given by @xmath35 defining @xmath36 yields the relation @xmath37 and obeys the riccati differential equation @xmath38 eqs.([eq : w2],[eq : riccati1d ] ) are identical to eq.([eq : riccati ] ) in @xmath18 . as a lesson
, one finds that the formalism of the supersymmetric partner potential has a close correspondence in @xmath18 to the quantum action .
the concept of the supersymmetric partner potential and the quantum action , however , differ in two respects : first the supersymmetric partner potential has no physical interpretation in contrast to the quantum action , which gives a representation of q.m .
transition amplitudes .
second , the concept of the supersymmetric partner potential is restricted to @xmath18 dimension@xcite , in contrast to the quantum action which is valid also in @xmath39 dimensions .
it would be tempting to apply the quantum action to the tunneling problem in @xmath39 dimensions .
some work is in progress . .
we consider the following classical potential in 1-d @xmath40 the corresponding classical action is given by @xmath41 .
the potential is parity symmetric .
because it has an infinite barrier ( for @xmath42 ) at the origin , the system at @xmath43 is separated from the system at @xmath44 .
we consider only the motion in the domain @xmath44 .
we have chosen to consider the inverse square potential , because of the distinct feature that the corresponding quantum mechanical transition amplitudes are known analytically@xcite .
the classical potential compared to the quantum potential as well as the ground state wave function is shown in fig.[[fig : potwave ] ] .
the behavior of the parameters of the quantum action as a function of transition time @xmath28 are shown in fig.[[fig : actpar ] ] .
the goodness of the fit of transition amplitudes by the quantum action , using only one trajectory is shown in fig.[[fig : e44_s ] ] .
it shows the global relative error of the quantum action versus transition time .
one observes a maximal error in the order of @xmath45 for @xmath46 .
when @xmath28 approaches zero , the error goes to zero .
it becomes quite small also for @xmath0 , consistent with the analytic behavior of the quantum action .
moreover , the figures shows that the error decreases , if the quantum potential allows for the presence of terms like @xmath47 and @xmath48 , which are absent in the classical potential .
fig.[[fig : estand_mv-2 ] ] shows the behavior of the parameter combination @xmath49 versus transition time , computed by doing an optimisation of the quantum action parameters to globally fit the transition amplitudes .
fig.[[fig : eqdiff_mv-2 ] ] shows the same quantity , computed in an alternative way from the flow equation , discussed in ref.@xcite .
one observes that both methods yield asymptotically stable results which agree among each other and their asymptotic values agree also with the analytical value @xmath50 , predicted by eq.([eq : transformlaw ] ) . obtained from global fit method vs. transition time @xmath28 .
] obtained from flow equation vs. transition time @xmath28 .
dependence on location of interval @xmath51 $ ] of final boundary points . ]
quantum chaos has been experimentally observed in irregular energy spectra of nuclei , and also in atoms exposed to strong electromagnetic fields@xcite .
classically chaotic billiard systems have a quantum counterpart being atoms moving in a 2-d billiard , where bounday reflections are caused by controlled interaction with laser beams@xcite .
irregular patterns have been predicted by computer simulations and were found experimentally in wave functions of quantum billards@xcite , where scars are reminders of classical motion@xcite .
recently , dynamical tunneling in atoms between regular islands has been observed .
the transition is enhanced by chaos@xcite .
spectra of fully chaotic quantum systems can statistically be described by random matrices@xcite , which corresponds to a level density distribution of wigner - type , while integrable ( nonchaotic ) quantum system yield a poissonian distribution .
here we ask : what happens between these two extremes ? for example , an hydrogen atom exposed to a weak exterior magnetic field shows a level distribution , which is neither poissonian nor wignerian .
can we compare classical chaos with quantum chaos ? is the quantum system more or less chaotic than the corresponding classical system ? moreover , an understanding of how classically mixed phase space is reflected in quantum systems is an open problem .
semiclassical methods of quantisation ( ekb , gutzwiller s trace formula ) are not amenable to mixed dynamical systems@xcite . here
we want to address those questions using the concept of the quantum action@xcite .
we have considered the following @xmath52 hamilton system , which is classically chaotic , @xmath53 in the quantum action we made an ansatz of the following form for the quantum potential , @xmath54 the parameters of the quantum action have been determined by a global fit to transition amplitudes .
the terms @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 , @xmath58 , @xmath59 , were found to be quite small or compatible with zero .
a comparison of poincare sections of the classical action and the quantum action shows that there are slightly more and larger regular islands in the quantum case than in the classical case .
the ratio of chaotic phase space is displayed in fig.[[fig : ratio ] ] .
it shows that overall the quantum system is less chaotic .
+ h.k . and k.j.m.m .
are grateful for support by nserc canada . | paper about use quantum action@xcite in physics discussing possible areas application high energy physics renormalisation quantum action may new definition of renormalisation renormalisation physical parameters like mass coupling from interacting quantum field theory at continuum limit physical parameters differ from bare parameters difference represents effects interaction quantum action has parameters mass potential different from classical action difference represents effects quantum mechanics q fluctuations in path integral represented by single path for particle with different properties mass interaction explore quantum action renormalisation construct quantum action for many - body system anharmonic oscillators explore quantum mechanical continuum limit quantum field theory renormalisation by computing n - point vertex functions vacuum - to - vacuum transition amplitudes for transition time existence quantum action proven in q.m . only single particle system cosmology inflationary scenario early universe inflation involves potentials with minima instanton solutions instanton quantum turns into classical effects on formation of galaxies@xcite effective potential creates potential different from classical may have minima absent in classical potential may create instantons different from classical@xcite instantons from quantum action softer than classical quantum effects may influence galaxy formation at end of inflation hot dense nuclear matter instantons important role in hot nuclear matter quark - gluon plasma phase important for chiral symmetry breaking solution u(1 ) problem neutrino oscillations oscillations neutrino tunneling in potential with degenerate minima condensed matter physics quantum dots semi - conductor quantum chaos advancing speed of microprocessors technological physical limits reducing size chip may enter quantum laws rule quantum chaos hamper flow electric currents quantitative determination of quantum chaos effects for development future microprocessors effective action quantum action study quantum corrals atoms quantum dots in semi - conductors study temperature dependence of electron dynamics in atomic corrals electrons in simple conductor - semiconductor - isolator geometries search for possible presence quantum chaos josephson junctions superconducting quantum interference devices demonstrate quantum superposition in macroscopic states squid potential double - well structure effective potential quantum potential tools analyze quantum superposition quantum computers based on superconductorssymmetry order parameter in triplet superconductors to degenerate chiral states gulian et al. predict degeneracy lifted via macroscopic quantum tunneling instanton - quantum behavior important triplet superconducters basic elements quantum computers effective potential quantum potential study quantum instantons tunneling atomic physics analogy classical chaos in quantum physics effective action characterize chaotic behavior quantum systems quantum action used allows phase space portrait poincar sections for quantum system obtain lyapunov exponents kam surfaces for quantum system interesting system paul trap ultracold atoms in billard formed lasers trace formulas used establish relation between level densities semi - classical orbits compare predictions trace formulas with effective action quantum action dynamical tunneling steck et hensinger et al demonstrated dynamical tunneling classical transition forbidden due to conserved quantity different energy realized by cold atoms quantum chaos enhances dynamical tunneling transition reexamine dynamical tunneling using phase space portrait from time - dependent effective action quantum action chemistry binding of macromoleculeschemical binding macromolecules double well potential effective action quantum action useful find pathways formation macromolecules paper on quantum action@xcite discuss analytical properties present results numerical computations quantum action fitting transition amplitudes address quantum chaos in nuclear physics atomic physics from viewpoint quantum action quantum action parametrizes transition amplitudes @xmath1 new action @xmath2 defined by @xmath3/\nonumber\tilde{s}[x ] =\int_{0}^{t }\frac{1}{2 }\tilde{m } \dot{x}^{2 } -\tilde{v}[x ]\end{aligned} @xmath2 local action quantum action @xmath4 classical trajectory from boundary point @xmath5 to @xmath6 multiple trajectories connecting boundary points sum over all trajectories @xmath7 is normalisation factor existence quantum action not proven yet operational definition quantum action optimal fit transition amplitudes @xmath1 for all combinations boundary points fixed transition time optimal fit single trajectory good large imaginary transition time quantum action proven exact parametrisation of transition amplitudes@xcitequantum action local allows portrait phase space system applying nonlinear dynamics@xcite allows poincar sections lyapunov exponents classical nonlinear dynamics definition lyapunov exponents requires limit @xmath0 ) @xmath8 @xmath9 full line quantum potential dashed line ground state wave function enhanced by factor 5 dotted line consider schrdinger equation in imaginary time @xmath10 ) with time - independent hamiltonian @xmath11 transition amplitude evolves according to @xmath12 < \psi_{n}|x_{in }__\psi_{gr }_{gr}_{in large time limit - transition amplitude projected onto ground state contribution large time physical information lost not stationary schrdinger equation allows potential @xmath13 mass from ground state @xmath14 mass reconstructed from groundstate plus excited states @xmath15 all information on hamiltonian stored in wave functions energies of two states analogous to biology genetic code stored in cells relation between ground state quantum potential proven in ref.@xcite @xmath16 @xmath17 denotes minimum value quantum potential@xmath18 dimension wave function quantum potential mass @xmath19 expression holds classical potential parity symmetric single minimum @xmath20 ground state wave single maximum @xmath20 formula multi - valley potentials establish differential equation classical potential quantum potential defining @xmath21 eqs.( psiclasspot psiquantpot defu yields @xmath22 riccati - type differential equation function @xmath23 @xmath24 given @xmath18 expressed @xmath25 bottom @xmath26 center @xmath27 top function transition time @xmath28 classical parameters @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath18 supersymmetry computation tunneling amplitudes potential supersymmetric partner potential yields same spectrum original potential ground state hamiltonian form @xmath32 @xmath33 supersymmetric partner potential @xmath34 defining @xmath36 yields relation @xmath37 obeys riccati differential equation @xmath38 eqs.([eq : w2] riccati1d identical to eq.( riccati @xmath18 supersymmetric partner potential @xmath18 quantum actionsupersymmetric partner potential quantum action differ supersymmetric potential no physical interpretation quantum action transition amplitudes restricted to @xmath18 dimension@xcite quantum action valid in @xmath39 dimensions tempting to apply quantum action to tunneling problem in @xmath39 dimensions work progress consider classical potential in @xmath40 classical action by @xmath41 potential parity symmetric infinite barrier for @xmath42 at origin system at @xmath43 separated from @xmath44 consider only motion in domain @xmath44 inverse square potential quantum mechanical transition amplitudes known analytically@xcite classical potential quantum potential ground state wave function shown in fig. parameters quantum action transition time @xmath28 shown in fig. fit of transition amplitudes by quantum action one trajectory shown in fig. e44 global relative error of quantum action versus transition time maximal error in @xmath45 for @xmath46 when @xmath28 approaches zero error to zero small for @xmath0 consistent with analytic behavior quantum action error decreases if quantum potential allows terms like @xmath47 and @xmath48 absent in classical potential fig.estand_mv-2 shows parameter combination @xmath49 versus transition time computed quantum action parameters fit transition amplitudes fig eqdiff_mv-2 shows same quantity computed from flow equation both methods yield stable results values agree with analytical value @xmath50 predicted by eq transformlaw obtained from global fit method vs. transition time @xmath28 on location of interval @xmath51 final boundary points quantum chaos observed in irregular energy spectra nuclei atoms exposed to strong electromagnetic fields chaotic billiard systems quantum counterpart atoms moving in 2-d billiard bounday reflections caused by interaction laser beams irregular patterns predicted by computer simulations found in wave functions quantum billards dynamical tunneling in atoms between regular islands observed transition enhanced by chaos fully chaotic quantum systems described by random matrices level density distribution wigner - type integrable nonchaotic poissonian distribution hydrogen atom exposed to weak magnetic field shows level distribution neither poissonian nor wigneriancompare classical chaos with quantum chaos ? quantum system more or less chaotic ? understanding mixed phase space in quantum systems open problem semiclassical methods quantisation not amenable to mixed dynamical systems address questions using quantum action considered @xmath52 hamilton system classically chaotic @xmath53 in quantum action ansatz form for quantum potential @xmath54 parameters determined by global fit to transition amplitudes terms @xmath55 @xmath56 small or compatible with zero comparison of poincare sections classical action and quantum action shows more larger regular islands in quantum case ratio of chaotic phase space displayed in fig. quantum system less chaotic.k k.j.m grateful for support by nserc canada | 0.57333 | 3,658 | 1,810 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,882 | we use the meson cloud model and the sullivan mechanism to estimate the sea flavor asymmetry in the @xmath0 baryon and calculate the distribution functions of both sea and valence quarks .
we find large deviations from su(3 ) . | by now , there have been a number of experiments which point to a flavor asymmetry in the sea of the proton @xcite .
although the exclusion principle @xcite and charge asymmetry @xcite may contribute to the observed asymmetries , they are not sufficiently large to explain the data @xcite .
the two most noteworthy experiments are the deviation of the gottfried sum rule from 1/3 , i.e. , @xmath1 @xcite and the recent drell - yan measurements of @xmath2 by e866 @xcite and na51 @xcite .
the cern measurement gives @xmath3 at @xmath4 and the fermilab one obtains the major part of the @xmath5-distribution of @xmath6 , finding @xmath7 at @xmath8 .
the most reasonable explanation of these large deviations from unity or 1/3 is that there is a flavor asymmetry in the sea quark distributions ; this flavor asymmetry is readily understood if a meson cloud surrounds the quarks , in that a proton can change into a neutron by emitting a @xmath9 , as first pointed out by thomas @xcite and later by henley and miller @xcite .
the sullivan process allows one to calculate the @xmath5-distribution of the asymmetry , as has been done by speth and collaborators @xcite and others ( see @xcite for references ) ; reasonable agreement with experiment is obtained .
+ more recently , alberg et al .
@xcite have pointed out that a test of the meson cloud model is feasible by carrying out drell - yan experiments with @xmath10 beams on protons and deuterium . in this model , the flavor asymmetry in the @xmath0 , for instance , is expected to be even larger than in the proton ( @xmath11 ) , so that @xmath2 should be much larger than 1 .
this is in contrast to the prediction of su(3 ) , under which @xmath12 by @xmath13 , from which it follows that @xmath14 in the @xmath0 .
+ in this paper we use the convolution method with the sullivan process to calculate the valence and sea quark distributions of the @xmath0 in the meson cloud model .
in the convolution method , the physical @xmath0 wave function is composed of the following fock states @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the probability amplitude to find a physical @xmath0 in a state consisting of a virtual baryon @xmath17 and a virtual meson @xmath18 with longitudinal momentum fractions @xmath19 and @xmath20 , and transverse momenta @xmath21 and @xmath22 , respectively .
the wave function renormalization factor @xmath23 is a measure of the probability of finding the `` bare '' @xmath0 , that is the @xmath0 without a meson cloud in the physical @xmath0 . + we assume that the @xmath24 will have components @xmath25 , + @xmath26 , @xmath27)$ ] and @xmath28 @xcite .
we neglect higher mass components .
+ in the infinite momentum frame ( imf , @xmath29 with @xmath30 the @xmath0 momentum ) the contribution of a certain fock state , @xmath31 , to the @xmath0 quark distribution can be written in terms of its quark components as @xmath32 where the splitting functions @xmath33 and @xmath34 are related to the probability amplitude @xmath35 in the imf via @xmath36 @xmath37 in terms of these splitting functions the wave function renormalization constant z is given by @xmath38^{-1}\equiv [ 1+\sum_{bm}\int_0 ^ 1f_{bm/ \sigma^+}(y)dy \;]^{-1 } , \ ] ] and the quark distribution functions @xmath39 of a @xmath0 within the fock state expansion are given as @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the quark distribution of the bare @xmath0 .
+ the next step is to calculate the splitting functions @xmath42 and @xmath43 .
we do this using time ordered perturbation theory ( topt ) in the imf , following the steps of reference @xcite . in topt in the imf
one can write the probability amplitudes @xmath44 explicitly as @xmath45 where @xmath46 is the invariant mass squared of the intermediate @xmath31 fock state @xmath47 and @xmath48 denotes the vertex function in the imf - limit .
vertices involving point - like particles automatically fulfill the symmetry relation @xmath49 but since hadrons have an extended structure one has to introduce phenomenological vertex form factors which parameterize the unknown microscopic effects .
therefore the vertex function @xmath50 is replaced by @xmath51@xmath50 and from equation ( 9 ) we get the restriction @xmath52 this is satisfied by the exponential form @xcite @xmath53 where @xmath54 is a cut - off parameter which we use in our further calculations .
+ equations ( 3 ) and ( 7 ) allow us to write the splitting functions as @xmath55 ^ 2}.\ ] ] one gets the spin averaged vertex functions in the imf from the interaction lagrangian density @xmath56 where @xmath57 denotes a baryon @xmath58 , @xmath59 , @xmath0 , @xmath60 and @xmath61 a pseudo scalar field @xmath62 , @xmath63 , @xmath64 @xcite . for the vertex @xmath65 the vertex function @xmath66
is given by @xmath67 @xmath68 and when spin averaged we obtain @xmath69 hence , in our case the splitting function is given by @xmath70 ^ 2}.\ ] ] using the following coupling constants g @xcite + @xmath71 = @xmath72 + @xmath73 @xmath74 + @xmath75 @xmath74 + @xmath76 @xmath77 + and the cutoff parameter @xmath78 gev for most of our work , @xcite we just need the quark distributions in the bare particles as an additional input . + for some of the following , we use holtmann s parameterization of the quark distribution function in the bare nucleon @xcite
in which he assumes a symmetric sea , @xmath79 @xmath80
@xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 in addition to this form for @xmath79 , we also take a form which is tied to the recent determination of the gluon distribution @xcite , @xmath84 since the gluon splits into the `` perturbative '' or bare sea quarks , this distribution should be close to that of those quarks . the advantage of this choice will become clear in the next section . for the quark distribution in the pion
@xcite we take @xmath85 @xmath86 where 20% of the pion s momentum is assumed to be carried by the symmetrical sea , which is presumed to be due to gluon splitting .
+ to begin with , we determined the quark distributions of the bare hyperons by using su(3 ) symmetry for the valence quarks ; that is we neglected the mass difference between the @xmath87 and @xmath88 and @xmath89 quarks .
we do not show the results because we do not believe that this is a realistic choice .
look at the @xmath90 .
experiments @xcite show that @xmath91 using this we can take the parametrization for the quark distribution in the pion to get the @xmath92 distribution in the @xmath93 and through charge independence the @xmath94 distribution in the @xmath90 . to get the s distribution in the @xmath90 we assume that the gluon and the light sea quark distributions in the kaon and the pion are the same and
hence carry the same momentum fraction in both particles .
we also assume the following form of the s quark distribution @xmath95 where the parameter @xmath96 is determined by matching up the right momentum fraction .
the valence quark distributions in the @xmath90 are then given by @xmath97 @xmath98 compared to the pion , where @xmath99 and @xmath100 look the same , the s distribution in the @xmath90 now peaks at higher @xmath5 than the @xmath94 distribution , which reflects the fact that the s quark is heavier than the u and the d. + our starting point for the bare @xmath0 is holtmann s parametrization for the bare nucleon , equations 18 - 21 .
again we assume only a change in the @xmath101-part of the parametrizations and that the light sea quarks and gluons in the bare @xmath0 and the bare nucleon look the same . to account for the higher mass of the s quark
we then make the ansatz @xmath102 where we take model dependent constituent quark masses to get @xmath103 the quark distributions in the bare @xmath0 are then @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 we can also determine the distributions in the bare @xmath59 and @xmath107 via charge independence and su(3 ) : @xmath59 : = @xmath108 = @xmath107 : = @xmath109 + @xmath110 @xmath111 + @xmath112 @xmath113 + @xmath114 @xmath115 .
+ since we assume no change in the symmetric sea of the bare particles , the only variance in the antiquark distributions of the physical @xmath0 comes from the different parametrization of the @xmath90 which only affects @xmath116 .
there is also a change in @xmath99 due to the more realistic @xmath87 quark distributions for the @xmath59 and the @xmath107 .
the splitting @xmath117 is nearly negligible . hence taking into account
the larger s quark mass does not noticeably change our results for @xmath2 and the difference @xmath118 from those using su(3 ) parameters .
however , the valence quark distributions in the physical @xmath0 do change .
we first test our model for the measured sea quark distributions in the proton .
we show both @xmath119 and @xmath2 in our model with no @xmath120 and no mesons more massive than the pion in figs . 1 and 2 .
the comparison with the e866 data shows that @xmath119 agrees reasonably with experiment , but that the ratio @xmath2 does not turn over towards 1 at higher value of @xmath5 with the parameterization of the bare sea used by holtmann@xcite .
this problem is also found for other meson cloud and chiral models , as has been recently noted by peng et al.@xcite .
however , we find that the ratio does turn over ( although not sufficiently fast ) for @xmath121 given by eq . 22 .
it is true that the inclusion of the @xmath120 would help , but we believe that the splitting of the gluon into @xmath122 pairs is the dominant cause of the return of the ratio @xmath123 towards unity at @xmath124 .
we believe that a parameterization for @xmath79 can be found that is consistent with the gluonic data and with the ratio @xmath2 . for a further discussion , see also @xcite .
+ the four splitting functions for the @xmath0 are shown in fig .
3 ; it is clear that the contribution from the @xmath125 state is very small . in fig .
4 we show the calculated valence quark momentum distributions . the s quark distribution peaks at a slightly higher value of @xmath5 than that of the @xmath88 quark momentum distribution due to its larger mass . the momentum distribution of the sea quarks is shown in figs .
we show the distributions for both the holtmann @xcite and the gluonic @xcite bare @xmath0 distributions .
the @xmath126 and @xmath127 distributions are slightly different , but the difference is so small that we do not attempt to show it .
the difference @xmath128 shown in fig .
8 is , of course , independent of the bare @xmath0 s quark distribution , since it is due to gluon splitting .
it is interesting to see in fig .
9 how much @xmath129 distribution depends on that of the bare sea . in both cases considered the ratio is larger than @xmath130 in the proton . for the holtmann @xcite bare quark distribution @xmath131 increases with increasing @xmath5 and does not turn over . for the gluonic distribution , on the other hand , @xmath132 does not rise half as high and approaches 1 as @xmath133 .
we show @xmath134 in fig .
10 and compare @xmath131 to @xmath135 in fig . 11 . in the latter figure
we note that @xmath136 falls below 1 for the gluonic - like distribution at high @xmath5 , but the distribution functions are very small here .
+ we also tested the influence of the cut - off parameter @xmath54 on our results .
since a higher cut - off primarily makes the amplitudes of the splitting functions larger but does not change their shape very much , the sea quarks will carry more of the @xmath0 momentum while the momentum fraction carried by the valence s quarks stays the same and that of the valence u quarks gets smaller .
the ratio @xmath137 gets smaller and the difference @xmath138 gets larger with growing @xmath54 [ at all x ] .
in conclusion , we have used the meson cloud model to calculate the valence and sea quark distributions in the @xmath0 . the same model can of course
be used to calculate the valence and sea quark distributions in the @xmath139 and @xmath140 .
now that quark distributions in the proton have been well - determined , it is possible to use @xmath0 and @xmath140 beams and inclusive drell - yan reactions on protons , alone , to obtain similar information for the hyperons .
nuclear binding corrections for deuterium targets are thereby avoided .
for instance if @xmath141 is large and @xmath142 is small , the measurement @xmath143 is sensitive to @xmath119 in the @xmath0 .
we wish to thank j.c .
peng for fruitful discussions and for providing helpful information .
this work has been supported in part by the u. s. department of energy , contract no .
de - fg03 - 97er41014 , and by the national science foundation , grant no .
phy-97 - 22023 . | experiments point to flavor asymmetry in sea proton @xcite exclusion principle charge asymmetry contribute to asymmetries not sufficiently large to explain data two noteworthy experiments are deviation gottfried sum rule from 1/3 @xmath1 drell - yan measurements of @xmath2 by e866 and na51 cern measurement gives @xmath3 at @xmath4 fermilab one obtains @xmath5-distribution @xmath6 @xmath7 at @xmath8 reasonable explanation large deviations from unity 1/3 flavor asymmetry in sea quark distributions understood if meson cloud surrounds quarks proton can change into neutron by emitting @xmath9 sullivan process allows @xmath5-distribution of asymmetry by speth collaborators agreement with experiment alberg et al . test of meson cloud model drell - yan experiments with @xmath10 beams on protons deuterium flavor asymmetry in @xmath0 larger than proton @xmath11 @xmath2 should larger than 1 contrast to prediction of su(3 ) @xmath12 by @xmath13 @xmath14 in @xmath0paper convolution method sullivan process calculate valence sea quark distributions @xmath0 in meson cloud model physical @xmath0 wave function fock states @xmath15 @xmath16 probability amplitude to find physical @xmath0 in virtual baryon @xmath17 virtual meson @xmath18 longitudinal momentum fractions @xmath19 @xmath20 transverse momenta @xmath21 @xmath22 wave function renormalization factor @xmath23 probability finding bare @xmath0 without meson cloud assume @xmath24 components @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27) @xmath28 neglect higher mass components infinite momentum frame contribution fock state @xmath31 to @xmath0 quark distribution @xmath32 splitting functions @xmath33 @xmath34 related to probability amplitude @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 wave function renormalization constant z given by @xmath38^{-1} quark distribution functions @xmath39 @xmath0 fock state expansion given as @xmath40 @xmath41 is quark distribution of bare @xmath0next step calculate splitting functions @xmath42 using time ordered perturbation theory steps probability amplitudes @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 invariant mass squared intermediate @xmath31 @xmath47 vertex function imf - limit vertices point - like particles fulfill symmetry relation @xmath49 hadrons extended structure phenomenological vertex form factors unknown microscopic effects vertex function @xmath50 replaced by @xmath51 equation ( 9 ) restriction @xmath52 satisfied by exponential form @xcite @xmath53 @xmath54 cut - off parameter further calculations equations ( 3 ) 7 ) write splitting functions as @xmath55 spin averaged vertex functions from interaction lagrangian density @xmath56 @xmath57 baryon pseudo scalar field @xmath62 vertex @xmath65 vertex function @xmath66 given by @xmath67 @xmath68 spin averaged obtain @xmath69 splitting function given by @xmath70coupling constants g @xcite + @xmath71 = @xmath72 + @xmath73 @xmath74 + @xmath75 + @xmath76 @xmath77 + cutoff parameter @xmath78 need quark distributions in bare particles additional input use holtmann s parameterization quark distribution function bare nucleon @xcite assumes symmetric sea , @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath79 form tied gluon distribution @xcite @xmath84 gluon splits into perturbative sea quarks distribution close to quarks advantage clear next section quark distribution in pion @xcite @xmath85 @xmath86 20% pion s momentum carried by symmetrical sea due to gluon splitting determined quark distributions bare hyperons su(3 ) symmetry valence quarks neglected mass difference between @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 quarks show results realistic choice @xmath90 experiments @xcite show @xmath91 parametrization quark distribution pion @xmath92 distribution @xmath93 @xmath94 distribution @xmath90 assume gluon light sea quark distributions in kaon pion same carry same momentum fraction both particlesassume s quark distribution @xmath95 parameter @xmath96 determined right momentum fraction valence quark distributions @xmath90 given by @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 s distribution @xmath90 peaks higher @xmath5 @xmath94 s quark heavier than u d starting point bare @xmath0 holtmann s parametrization bare nucleon equations 18 - 21 assume change @xmath101-part parametrizations light sea quarks gluons @xmath0 nucleon same account higher mass s quark ansatz @xmath102 model dependent quark masses @xmath103 quark distributions bare @xmath0 @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 determine distributions @xmath59 @xmath107 via charge independence su(3 ) @xmath59 @xmath108 @xmath107 @xmath109 @xmath110 no change symmetric sea bare particles variance antiquark distributions physical @xmath0 different parametrization @xmath90 affects @xmath116 change in @xmath99 realistic @xmath87 quark distributions @xmath59 @xmath107 splitting @xmath117 negligible larger s quark mass change results @xmath2 difference @xmath118 su(3 ) parametersvalence quark distributions in @xmath0 change test model for sea quark distributions proton show @xmath119 @xmath2 no @xmath120 mesons more massive than pion in figs 1 2 comparison with e866 data shows @xmath119 agrees with experiment ratio @xmath2 turn towards 1 at higher value @xmath5 with parameterization holtmann@xcite problem for other meson cloud chiral models noted by peng et al.@xcite ratio for @xmath121 22 inclusion @xmath120 splitting gluon into @xmath122 pairs dominant return ratio @xmath123 towards unity at @xmath124 parameterization for @xmath79 consistent with gluonic data ratio @xmath2 see @xcite four splitting functions for @xmath0 shown in fig . 3 contribution from @xmath125 small fig . 4 calculated valence quark momentum distributions distribution peaks higher value @xmath5 than @xmath88 due larger mass momentum distribution sea quarks shown in figs distributions holtmann @xcite gluonic @xcite bare @xmath0 distributions @xmath126 @xmath127 distributions different difference small difference @xmath128 in fig .8 independent of @xmath0 s quark distribution due to gluon splitting fig . 9 @xmath129 distribution depends on bare sea ratio larger than @xmath130 in proton holtmann @xcite bare quark distribution @xmath131 increases with @xmath5 turn over gluonic distribution @xmath132 approaches 1 @xmath133 @xmath134 in fig . 10 @xmath131 to @xmath135 . 11 @xmath136 falls below 1 gluonic - distribution at @xmath5 distribution functions small tested influence cut - off parameter @xmath54 results higher cut - off makes splitting functions larger shape sea quarks carry more @xmath0 momentum momentum fraction valence s quarks stays same valence u quarks smaller ratio @xmath137 smaller difference @xmath138 larger with @xmath54 used meson cloud model valence sea quark distributions in @xmath0 model @xmath139 @xmath140 quark distributions proton determined possible use @xmath0 @xmath140 beams drell - yan reactions on protons similar information for hyperons nuclear binding corrections for deuterium targets avoided@xmath141 large @xmath142 small measurement @xmath143 sensitive to @xmath119 thank j.c. peng discussions information work supported by u. s. department energy contract de - fg03 - 97er41014 national science foundation grant phy-97 - 22023 | 0.495138 | 3,247 | 1,754 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,883 | the effect of matter enhanced neutrino oscillations on atmosheric neutrinos is investigated systematically in the framework of one mass dominant model of three neutrinos .
the resonance conditions of neutrino crossing the earth are determined by the three parameters , namely , the zenith angle , @xmath0 , and the mixing angle @xmath1 of the electron neutrinos with tau neutrinos .
the values of the triplet under the resonance is found numerically . | it was almost ten years ago that the atmospheric neutrino anomaly@xcite could be explained by the oscillations of muon neutrinos into tau neutrinos @xcite .
this interpretation has been confirmed by the observation of the zenith angle dependence of the neutrino fluxes by the superkamiokande@xcite .
while the zenith angle dependence of the electron - like events is consistent with the theoretical predictions@xcite@xcite , that of the muon - like events disagree with the theory , especially for the up - going events . the neutrino state with flavor basis and that of mass basis is related to each other by the mixing matrix as follows , @xmath2 where @xmath3 the super - kamiokande shows that @xmath4 the equation ( [ eq : mu - tau_osc ] ) means that @xmath5 which is consistent with the choos results@xcite .
once the the matter enhanced neutrino oscillations was proposed @xcite , it has soon been applied to the atmospheric neutrinos crossing the earth@xcite .
recently much attention@xcite has been devoted to this subject .
however , it seems that no systmatic study has not been made yet , especially for the three flavor model of neutrinos .
the purpose of this paper is to reveal the conditions that amplify the effect of @xmath1 through matter oscillations so that we can determine this small mixing angle .
i assume that the masses of neutrinos are hierarchical , namely , @xmath6 @xmath7 , furthermore i assume that the solar neutrino oscillations are attributed to @xmath8 .
the atmospheric neutrino oscillations are derived by @xmath9 @xmath10 , the value of which is @xmath11 .
the solar neutrino problem may be solved by the matter enhanced , or just so oscillations . in either case
, @xmath12 is much smaller than @xmath13 , and irrelevant to our concerns . in the following , we assign @xmath14 , and @xmath15 .
the parameters contained in the model are @xmath16 , @xmath1 , and @xmath17 .
in calculating the matter effect of the earth , i use the density profile given by the `` preliminary reference earth model''(prem)@xcite .
the prominent feature of our model is that the survival probability of electron neutrinos @xmath18 is completely determined by the three parameters , _
i.e. _ , @xmath1 , @xmath0 where @xmath19 is the neutrino energy , and the zenith angle @xmath20 .
it is natural to define the resonance condition as @xmath21 the resonance states form curves in the the three parameter space @xmath22 @xmath23 corresponding to discretization of the resonance wavelength .
i solve eq.([eq : resonance ] ) numerically , and show in fig.1 and fig.2 the values of the three parameters at the resonance . fig.1 and
fig.2 correspond to the longest and the second longest wavelength , respectively .
the other probabilities @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 , and @xmath27 @xmath28 also depend on the @xmath29 mixing angle @xmath16 .
i have investigated the resonance conditions of neutrinos passing through the earth in a wide range of parameters , although only a small mixing angle @xmath30 has a practical meaning as has been suggested by the choos experiments .
the results show that it is necessary to observe the high energy electron neutrinos crossing the depth of the earth to investgate the small mixing angle @xmath1 .
for example , the resonance occurs at @xmath31 , @xmath32 , and @xmath33 .
the energy of electron neutrino is @xmath34 if @xmath35 .
this indicates the need to assemble the data of the zenith angle distribution of the electron neutrinos whose energy is of order @xmath34 in order to determine the lepton mixing angle @xmath1 .
see for example , j. pantaleone , phys .
81 ( 1998 ) 5060 ; m.v .
chizhov and s.t .
petcov , phys .
83 ( 1999 ) 1096 ; e.kh .
akhmedov , a. dighe , p. lipari , and a.yu .
smirnov , nucl .
phys . b3542 ( 1986 ) 1454 ; o. yasuda , acta phys .
b30 ( 1999 ) 3089 ; t. ohlsson and h. snellman , phys .
b474 ( 2000 ) 153 ; i. mocioiu and r. shrock , hep - ph/0002149 ( 2000 ) . | ten years ago atmospheric neutrino anomaly explained by oscillations muon into tau neutrinos interpretation confirmed by zenith angle dependence neutrino fluxes superkamiokande zenith angle dependence electron - like events consistent with predictions muon - like events disagree especially up - events neutrino state flavor mass basis related by mixing matrix @xmath2 kamiokande shows @xmath4 equation mu - tau_osc ] means @xmath5 consistent with results matter enhanced neutrino oscillations proposed applied to atmospheric neutrinos crossing earth attention devoted to subject no systmatic study made for three flavor model of neutrinos purpose paper reveal conditions effect @xmath1 through matter oscillations determine small mixing angle masses of neutrinos hierarchical solar neutrino oscillations attributed to @xmath8 atmospheric neutrino oscillations derived by @xmath9 @xmath10 value is @xmath11 solar neutrino problem may solved by matter enhanced oscillations @xmath12 smaller than @xmath13 irrelevant to concerns assign @xmath14 and @xmath15parameters in model are @xmath16 matter effect earth density profile preliminary reference earth model'' survival probability of electron neutrinos @xmath18 determined by three parameters @xmath1 @xmath0 neutrino energy zenith angle @xmath20 resonance condition as @xmath21 states form curves in parameter @xmath22 @xmath23 resonance wavelength solve eq.( resonance ) numerically show in fig.1 fig.2 values of three parameters at resonance correspond to longest second longest wavelength other probabilities @xmath24 @xmath28 depend on @xmath29 mixing angle @xmath16 investigated resonance conditions of neutrinos earth parameters small mixing angle @xmath30 has practical meaning to observe high energy electron neutrinos crossing depth earth small mixing angle @xmath1 resonance occurs at @xmath31 @xmath33 energy of electron neutrino is @xmath34 if @xmath35 need to assemble data zenith angle distribution of electron neutrinos energy @xmath34 to determine lepton mixing angle @xmath1j. pantaleone . 81 1998 ) 5060 chizhov petcov phys 83 1999 ) 1096 akhmedov dighe lipari smirnov. b3542 1986 ) 1454 yasuda phys. b30 1999 3089 t ohlsson snellman . b474 2000 ) 153 mocioiu shrock hep ph/0002149 2000 ) | 0.180674 | 1,031 | 512 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
197,886 | knowledge of the equation of state of the baryon matter plays a decisive role in the description of neutron stars . with an increase of the baryon density
the filling of fermi seas of hyperons and @xmath0 isobars becomes possible .
their inclusion into standard relativistic mean - field models results in a strong softening of the equation of state and a lowering of the maximum neutron star mass below the measured values .
we extend a relativistic mean - field model with scaled hadron masses and coupling constants developed in our previous works and take into account now not only hyperons but also the @xmath0 isobars .
we analyze available empirical information to put constraints on coupling constants of @xmath0s to mesonic mean fields .
we show that the resulting equation of state satisfies majority of presently known experimental constraints . | relativistic mean - field ( rmf ) models are widely used to construct a realistic equation of state ( eos ) , which could satisfy various experimental constraints @xcite .
the most challenging task is to reconcile the constraint on the pressure in the isospin - symmetrical matter ( ism ) , the so - called `` flow constraint '' @xcite , which favors a soft eos , and the existence of the neutron star ( ns ) , with the mass @xmath1 @xcite ( @xmath2 is the sun mass ) , which favors a stiff eos . in standard rmf models
hyperons may appear in ns cores .
this results in a decrease of the maximum ns mass below the observed limit , cf .
@xcite and references therein .
the appearance of @xmath0 isobars in nss would lead to a further decrease of the maximum ns mass @xcite .
these problems are dubbed in the literature as the hyperon and @xmath0 puzzles . in
@xcite we proposed an rmf model with scaled hadron masses and coupling constants ( labeled there as mkvor ) , which solves the hyperon puzzle and fulfills successfully the maximum mass constraint , the flow constraint and various other constraints , but the @xmath0s were not included . here
we show that our model passes the constraints also with the inclusion of @xmath0s .
a more detailed consideration can be found in @xcite .
the lagrangian of the model is formulated in @xcite .
the model is a generalization of the non - linear walecka model with effective coupling constants @xmath3 and hadron masses @xmath4 dependent on the @xmath5 field @xcite , here @xmath6 lists the included mesonic fields , @xmath7 indicates the baryon species ( @xmath8 ; @xmath9 is the @xmath10 hyperon ; @xmath0 labels the @xmath0 isobar ) and @xmath11 labels the hadrons ; @xmath12 and @xmath13 are the corresponding scaling functions . in the rmf approximation
the contribution of @xmath0s to the energy density has the same form as for spin-@xmath14 fermions but with the spin degeneracy factor @xmath15 . the energy density of our model , @xmath16 = \sum_b e_{\rm kin}\big(p_{{\rm f},b } , m_b^ * ( f ) , s_b \big ) + \sum_{l = e,\mu } e_{\rm kin}(p_{{\rm f},l},m_l , s_l ) + \frac{m_n^4 f^2}{2 c_\sigma^2 } \eta_\sigma(f ) \nonumber \\ & + \frac{1}{2 m_n^2 } \big[\frac{c_\om^2 n^2 } { \eta_\om(f ) } + \frac{c_\rho^2 n_i^2}{\eta_\rho(f ) } + \frac{c_\phi^2 n_s^2}{\eta_\phi(f ) } \big ] , \ , n=\sum_b x_{\om b } n_b,\ , n_i=\sum_b x_{\rho b } t_{3 b } n_b,\ ,
n_\phi=\sum_{h } x_{\phi h } n_h , \label{edensity}\end{aligned}\ ] ] is expressed in terms of the scalar field @xmath17 , @xmath18 and particle densities @xmath19 , where @xmath20 , @xmath21 is the fermion spin and @xmath22 stands for the isospin projection of baryon @xmath23 .
the fermion kinetic energy density is defined as @xmath24 .
meson coupling constants , masses and scaling functions enter the energy density only in combinations @xmath25 therefore , studying infinite matter we do not have to specify the coupling constants , meson masses and their scaling factors separately . the baryon mass scaling function
is @xmath26 .
the particle densities as functions of the total baryon density @xmath27 in beta - equilibrium matter ( bem ) follow from the conditions : @xmath28 , where @xmath29 is the baryon charge and @xmath30 are the fermion chemical potentials ; @xmath31 ; and the charge neutrality condition @xmath32 .
these equations are solved self - consistently with the equation of motion for the scalar field @xmath33 .
finally , the pressure is given by @xmath34 .
the parameters of the model in the nucleon sector are fitted to reproduce the nuclear matter saturation properties , which are defined as coefficients of the taylor expansion of the energy per particle in ism in terms of @xmath35 and @xmath36 , @xmath37 and @xmath38 .
we consider an extension of the mkvor model introduced in @xcite , labeled as mkvor * , for details see @xcite .
the input parameters are the same as in the mkvor model : the nuclear saturation density @xmath39 , the binding energy @xmath40 , the incompressibility @xmath41 , the symmetry energy @xmath42 and the nucleon effective mass @xmath43 . scaling functions of the mkvor * model as functions of the scalar field
are shown in figure [ eta_f ] .
compared to mkvor model in the @xmath44 function an additional sharp decrease at @xmath45 is introduced .
a sharp decrease of at least one of @xmath46 scaling functions for @xmath47 leads to a stiffening of the eos , cf .
it limits the scalar field growth with the increasing density and prevents the nucleon effective mass from vanishing , which would occur in the original mkvor model in the ism if @xmath0 were included . dashes in figure [ eta_f ]
mark maximum values of the scalar field @xmath48 , reachable in the nss . in the bem
all results for mkvor and mkvor * models coincide for densities reachable in nss .
the behavior of the scaling functions for @xmath49 is irrelevant in bem .
the hyperon and @xmath0 couplings with vector mesons are related to the nucleon ones via the su(6 ) symmetry relations @xcite : @xmath50 coupling constants with the @xmath5 meson follow from the baryon potentials in ism at the saturation density @xmath51 , where we set @xmath52 , @xmath53 , and @xmath54 .
the @xmath0 potential is poorly constrained by the data .
we explore the range @xmath55 , keeping in mind that the realistic value of @xmath56 is close to the nucleon one @xmath57 .
the scaling function for @xmath58 meson is chosen as @xmath59 , which corresponds to the @xmath60 set of models in @xcite .
below we label the mkvor * model with @xmath0s and without hyperons as mkvor*@xmath0 , and the model with @xmath0s and full baryon octet with @xmath60 scaling as mkvor*h@xmath61 .
neutron star masses and radii are obtained by integrating the tolman
oppenheimer volkoff equation . for the bem for densities @xmath62
our eos is supplemented by the eos of the ns crust .
the details can be found in @xcite .
concentrations in ism as functions of the density .
lines are labeled with the potentials @xmath56 , in @xmath63 .
right panel : pressure as a function of the density for our model without and with @xmath0s for @xmath64 , @xmath65 and @xmath66 . for @xmath65 and @xmath67 bold lines
show the maxwell constructions and thin lines show the original pressure curves .
hatched area shows the flow constraint from @xcite . ]
on the left panel in figure [ dsym ] we show the @xmath0 concentrations , determined in the ism by the chemical equilibrium condition @xmath68 . we see that with a decrease of @xmath56 the critical density for the @xmath0 appearance decreases .
for @xmath69 the @xmath0 baryons appear in a third - order phase transition .
interestingly , for @xmath70 there exists a density range with multiple solutions for @xmath71 at a given density . among these solutions the one with greater @xmath71 is energetically favorable .
this means that @xmath0s appear with a jump from @xmath72 to a finite value of @xmath71 in a first - order phase transition .
the pressure in the ism as a function of the density is shown on the right panel in figure [ dsym ] .
for @xmath73 in the equilibrium the system follows the maxwell - construction line . for @xmath70 the region with multiple solutions
manifests itself also in the pressure .
note that for @xmath74 the equilibrium pressure curve lies fully within the flow constraint .
it means that if in the future the constraint sharpens , it could be used to constrain the @xmath0 potential . as functions of the density in bem in the mkvor*@xmath0 ( left panel ) and mkvor*h@xmath61 ( right panel ) models for @xmath75 and @xmath76 . ]
the particle fractions as functions of the density in the bem are presented in figure [ nd_bem ] for the mkvor*@xmath0 model ( left panel ) and for the mkvor*h@xmath61 model ( right panel ) , for @xmath75 and @xmath77 . with an increase of the density
@xmath78s appear in both cases at density @xmath79 for @xmath75 and @xmath80 for @xmath81 .
the @xmath0 fraction increases sharply , and for the mkvor*@xmath0 model reaches @xmath82 and @xmath83 for @xmath84 and @xmath67 , respectively . as in @xcite , the inclusion of hyperons reduces the amount of @xmath0s at a given density . ,
mkvor*@xmath0 ( @xmath81 ) and mkvor*h@xmath61 ( @xmath85 and @xmath67 ) models .
right panel : the gravitational ns mass as a function of the baryon mass for mkvor*h@xmath61 model for @xmath75 ( @xmath0s do not yet appear for stars with masses in the shown range ) and @xmath81 .
shaded rectangle shows the constraint from @xcite , two empty rectangles show the change of the constraint at the assumption of progenitor mass loss by @xmath86 and @xmath87 . ] despite the @xmath0 fraction in the ns medium is large , the effect of @xmath0s on the ns masses and radii appears to be small . on the left panel in figure [ nsprops ]
we show the ns mass as a function of the central density for our models , and on the middle panel the mass - radius plot is shown .
the maximum decrease of a ns mass at a given central density in mkvor*h@xmath61 model is less than @xmath88 for @xmath75 and does not exceed @xmath89 for @xmath81 .
the decrease of the maximum ns mass is even smaller , being less than @xmath90 for @xmath81 .
the change of the ns radius for a given ns mass is not more than @xmath91 .
thus , within the mkvor*h@xmath61 model both @xmath0 and hyperon puzzles are resolved .
an interesting observation is that the inclusion of @xmath0s allows to improve the constraint extracted from analysis of gravitational and baryon masses of the pulsar j0737 - 3039(b ) @xcite . on the right panel in figure [ nsprops ]
we show the gravitational ns mass as a function of the baryon ns mass for @xmath75 and @xmath76 together with the constraint from @xcite . for @xmath75
the curve is the same as in the case without @xmath0s , since @xmath0s do not appear at the densities corresponding to the central density of the ns with @xmath92 . for @xmath81 the constraint
is passed better .
we studied the effect of inclusion of @xmath0 isobars on the eos of the ns matter with hyperons within the mkvor - based rmf models of @xcite with scaled hadron coupling constants and masses .
we varied the @xmath0 potential at the saturation density , @xmath56 , in the range @xmath93 to estimate the maximum effect of the @xmath0 appearance on ns properties . for the ism @xmath0 baryons can appear in third- or first - order phase transitions , depending on the value of @xmath56 . in the ns matter
the @xmath0 fraction is not small for @xmath93 , which we studied . in spite of that ,
a decrease of the maximum ns mass does not exceed @xmath94 , so the maximum mass constraint remains satisfied . in the presence of @xmath0s the constraint on the relation between the gravitational and baryon masses of j0737 - 3039(b ) @xcite proves
to be better fulfilled .
the reported study was funded by the russian foundation for basic research ( rfbr ) according to the research project no 16 - 02 - 00023-a .
the work was also supported by the slovak grant no .
vega-1/0469/15 , by `` newcompstar '' , cost action mp1304 and by the ministry of education and science of the russian federation ( basic part ) .
99 klhn t _ et al .
_ 2006 _ phys .
_ c * 74 * 035802 . | relativistic mean - field rmf models construct realistic equation of state eos experimental constraints challenging task constraint on pressure in isospin - symmetrical matter flow constraint '' soft eos neutron star ( ns with mass @xmath1 @xmath2 sun mass favors stiff eos in standard rmf models hyperons appear in ns cores results in decrease maximum ns mass below observed limit @xmath0 isobars in nss further decrease maximum ns mass hyperon and @xmath0 puzzles proposed rmf model with scaled hadron masses coupling constants mkvor ) solves hyperon puzzle fulfills maximum mass flow constraint other constraints @xmath0s not included our model passes constraints with inclusion of @xmath0s detailed consideration in @xcite lagrangian of model formulated in @xcitemodel non - linear walecka model coupling constants @xmath3 hadron masses @xmath4 dependent on @xmath5 field @xmath6 lists mesonic fields @xmath7 baryon species @xmath9 hyperon @xmath0 isobar hadrons @xmath12 scaling functions contribution @xmath0s to energy density spin-@xmath14 fermions spin degeneracy factor @xmath15energy density model @xmath16 = \sum_b{\rm\big f}_b f \sum_{l = e,\mu{\rm f \frac{m_n^4 f^2\sigma^2_\sigma(f ) \frac{1}{2 m_n^2\frac{c_\om^2 n^2 }\om(f )\frac{c_\rho^2 n_i^2\eta_\rho(f )\frac{c_\phi^2 n_s^2}_\phi(f ) n=\sum_b x{\om b_i=\sum_b x{\rho b b\phi=\sum_{h }{\phi h{edensity}{aligned expressed scalar field @xmath17 @xmath18 particle densities @xmath19 @xmath20 fermion spin isospin projection baryon fermion kinetic energy density @xmath24 meson coupling constants masses scaling functions enter energy density combinations studying infinite matter specify coupling constants masses scaling factors separatelybaryon mass scaling function is @xmath26 particle densities functions of total baryon density @xmath27 in beta - equilibrium matter follow from conditions @xmath28 baryon charge @xmath30 fermion chemical potentials @xmath31 charge neutrality condition @xmath32 equations solved with equation motion scalar field @xmath33 pressure given by @xmath34 parameters model nucleon sector reproduce nuclear matter saturation properties coefficients of taylor expansion energy per particle @xmath35 @xmath36 extension of mkvor model in @xcite mkvor * input parameters nuclear saturation density @xmath39 binding energy incompressibility symmetry energy nucleon effective mass @xmath43 scaling functions mkvor * functions scalar field shown in figure [ eta_f ] sharp decrease at @xmath45 sharp decrease of @xmath46 scaling functions for @xmath47 leads to stiffening eos limits scalar field growth prevents nucleon effective mass vanishing dashes in mark maximum values scalar field @xmath48 reachable in nssresults mkvor models coincide for densities nss scaling functions @xmath49 irrelevant hyperon @xmath0 couplings related to nucleon ones su(6 ) symmetry relations @xmath50 coupling constants @xmath5 meson follow baryon potentials saturation density @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath0 potential constrained by data explore range @xmath55 realistic value @xmath56 close to nucleon one @xmath57 scaling function @xmath58 meson chosen @xmath59 corresponds to @xmath60 models label mkvor * model with hyperons mkvor*@xmath0 mkvor*h@xmath61 neutron star masses radii obtained tolman oppenheimer volkoff equation densities @xmath62 eos supplemented by eos ns crust details in @xcite concentrations in ism functions of density lines labeled with potentials @xmath56 @xmath63 pressure function density model without @xmath0s @xmath64 @xmath66 bold lines show maxwell constructions original pressure curves hatched area flow constraint from @xciteleft panel figure [ dsym @xmath0 concentrations determined by chemical equilibrium condition @xmath68 decrease @xmath56 critical density @xmath0 appearance decreases @xmath69 @xmath0 baryons appear third - order phase transition @xmath70 density range multiple solutions for @xmath71 density greater @xmath71 energetically favorable @xmath0s appear jump from @xmath72 to @xmath71 first - order phase transition pressure ism function density shown right panel figure [ dsym @xmath73 equilibrium system follows maxwell - construction line @xmath70 region with multiple solutions manifests in pressure @xmath74 equilibrium pressure curve within flow constraint constraint sharpens constrain @xmath0 potential functions density bem mkvor*@xmath0*h@xmath61 models for @xmath75 @xmath76 particle fractions functions density presented figure [ nd_bem ] for mkvor*@xmath0 @xmath75 @xmath77 increase density @xmath78s appear at density @xmath79 @xmath75 @xmath80 @xmath81@xmath0 fraction increases mkvor*@xmath0 model reaches @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath67 inclusion of hyperons reduces @xmath0s at density mkvor*@xmath0 mkvor*h@xmath61 ) models gravitational ns mass function baryon mass for @xmath75 @xmath81 shaded rectangle shows constraint from @xcite empty rectangles show change constraint progenitor mass loss by @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath0 fraction large effect of @xmath0s on ns masses radii small left figure ns mass function central density mass - radius plot maximum decrease of ns mass at central density@xmath61 less than @xmath88 for @xmath75 exceed @xmath89 for @xmath81 decrease maximum ns mass smaller less than @xmath90 for @xmath81 change of ns radius for mass not more than @xmath91 mkvor*h@xmath61 model @xmath0 hyperon puzzles resolved inclusion of @xmath0s constraint analysis gravitational baryon masses pulsar j0737 - 3039(b ) @xciteright panel figure nsprops gravitational ns mass function baryon ns mass @xmath75 @xmath76 constraint @xcite @xmath75 curve same without @xmath0s central density @xmath92 @xmath81 constraint passed better studied effect @xmath0 isobars eos ns matter hyperons mkvor rmf models @xcite hadron coupling constants varied @xmath0 potential saturation density @xmath56 @xmath93 estimate maximum effect @xmath0 appearance ns properties @xmath0 baryons appear third- first - order phase transitions value @xmath56 ns matter @xmath0 fraction not small @xmath93 decrease maximum ns mass exceed @xmath94 maximum mass constraint satisfied presence @xmath0s constraint relation gravitational baryon masses j0737 - 3039(b ) @xcite better fulfilled study funded russian foundation basic research research project 16 - 02 - 00023-a supported slovak grant vega-1/0469/15 newcompstar cost action mp1304 ministry education science russian federation 99 klhn t et al . 2006 phys . c * 74 * 035802 | 0.492111 | 3,024 | 1,582 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,897 | laser spectroscopy studies are being prepared to measure the @xmath0 ground state hyperfine splitting in trapped cold highly charged ions .
the purpose of such experiments is to test quantum electrodynamics in the strong electric field regime .
these experiments form part of the hitrap project at gsi .
a brief review of the planned experiments is presented . , ,
highly charged ion , hyperfine splitting , laser spectroscopy 32.30.jc , 12.20.fv , 21.10.ky | an accurate measurement of the hyperfine splitting ( hfs ) of the @xmath0 ground state of hydrogen - like highly charged ions ( hci ) is a good test of quantum electrodynamics ( qed ) in the limit of strong electric fields ( @xmath1 v / cm @xcite ) .
such strong fields can not be produced using conventional laboratory techniques , but naturally exist close to the stripped nuclei of heavy elements like pb , bi or u. by detecting the fluorescence from the laser - excited upper hyperfine state of such a trapped and cold ion , a high - precision measurement of the hyperfine splitting can be made .
hci with extremely high charge states ( _ e.g. _ pb@xmath2 or u@xmath3 ) and relativistic energies ( 400 mev / u ) are created in the heavy ion facility ( sis ) at gsi in darmstadt .
these hci are injected into the experimental storage ring ( esr ) and can be decelerated ( down to 4 mev / u ) forming 1 @xmath4s long bunches containing about @xmath5 ions , arriving every 10 seconds . in the hitrap project @xcite these bunches will be extracted from the esr , decelerated by linear ( ih - linac ) and radiofrequency ( rfq ) stages , trapped and cooled in a penning trap ( cooler trap ) , and made available for experiments . in the esr at gsi , previous measurements of the hfs were made on bunches of relativistic hci such as @xmath6bi@xmath7 @xcite and @xmath8pb@xmath2 @xcite .
hfs measurements were also made at the superebit on @xmath9ho@xmath10 @xcite , @xmath11re@xmath12 @xcite and @xmath13tl@xmath14 @xcite .
the resolution obtained in the above experiments is mainly limited by the doppler effect .
a measurement of the @xmath0 ground state hfs of trapped cold hci using laser spectroscopy should be even more accurate due to a cryogenic uhv environment , high ion cloud density , the absence of a large doppler shift and virtually unlimited measurement time .
laser spectroscopy offers the possibility of high - accuracy measurements of transition wavelengths in the visible region @xcite . in hci ,
electronic transitions are generally in the far uv or x - ray regions of the spectrum . however , since the @xmath0 groundstate hfs scales with the atomic number @xmath15 as @xmath16 , the ground state hfs of hydrogen - like hci can move into the visible spectrum for @xmath17 @xcite .
the lifetime of this transition falls as @xmath18 and is of the order of milliseconds for @xmath17 .
a measurement of this transition wavelength gives information on the qed corrections to the hfs or on the spatial distribution of the nuclear magnetisation ( bohr - weisskopf effect ) , which is affected by core polarisation and is not really well understood @xcite .
its measurement thus allows for critical tests of nuclear models . from a comparison of measurements of the hfs of hydrogen - like and lithium - like hci the nuclear effects
can be eliminated so that an accurate measurement of the qed effects can be made @xcite .
there are several candidate systems that can be studied at hitrap , including radioactive isotopes
. an interesting first challenge would be to measure the hfs of the @xmath0 ground state @xmath19 transition of @xmath8pb@xmath2 ions ( @xmath20 nm @xcite ) by means of laser spectroscopy . in order to reach the necessary accuracy ,
the hci will be trapped in a cryogenic uhv environment .
once trapped , the ions can be easily stored for long times , therefore the lifetime @xmath21
ms @xcite of the upper hyperfine state is not a problem .
electron capture ( neutralisation ) by collisions is strongly reduced by operating the trap at cryogenic temperatures ( 4 k ) under uhv conditions ( below @xmath22 mbar ) .
ground states of @xmath23 nuclei plotted versus magnetic field : a ) hydrogen atom @xmath24h@xmath25 , b ) highly charged lead ion @xmath8pb@xmath2 .
( the plots are drawn with different scales.),width=283 ]
the high precision measurements of the hfs will be performed on hci in a penning trap , but the strong magnetic field will shift and split the hyperfine levels and thus the natural hfs .
this ` zeeman effect ' @xcite is schematically illustrated in figure 1a ) for the @xmath0 ground state hfs in hydrogen , which has nuclear spin @xmath23 . for hydrogen
the hfs can be easily calculated using the famous breit - rabi formula @xcite .
the zero - field splitting @xmath26 is modified by the interaction between the magnetic moment @xmath4 of the ion and the magnetic field strength @xmath27 . in the simple hydrogen case at a field of 1 t , the zeeman splitting of about @xmath28 hz is more than one order of magnitude larger than the hfs in hydrogen ( @xmath29 hz or 21 cm ) .
however , for hci the hfs dominates the zeeman splitting by several orders of magnitude .
this is indicated in figure 1b ) for the @xmath0 ground state hfs of @xmath8pb@xmath2 , which also has nuclear spin @xmath23 .
ground state hyperfine splittings in the visible spectrum for atomic number @xmath15 ranging from 50 to 100.,width=264 ] in figure 2 the calculated wavelengths of the @xmath0 ground state hyperfine transition ( neglecting qed and the bohr - weisskopf effect ) are plotted for hci with atomic number @xmath15 ranging from 50 to 100 .
most of these heavier elements have their hfs in the visible region of the spectrum and are thus easily excited by conventional tunable laser systems .
the hci will be extracted from the hitrap cooler trap in a long narrow bunch with an average kinetic energy of a few ev and containing about @xmath5 ions .
the radial energy spread will be reduced so as to maintain a parallel beam @xcite .
the hci will then be loaded into the spectroscopy trap , which is a cylindrical open - endcap penning trap @xcite with compensation electrodes to create a nearly perfect quadrupole potential at the trap centre .
figure 3 schematically shows the expected layout of the electrodes , the tank circuit for resistive cooling @xcite and the trap loading scheme : the hci enter from the right , are reflected by the left capture electrode , enclosed by the right one , localised near the trap centre and finally cooled and compressed .
the principle of resistive cooling is fairly straightforward and well - known : the axial motion of the hci in the trap induces image charges in the open - endcap electrodes , which can readily be detected by a frequency resonant electronic tank circuit ( lcr - filter ) attached to the electrodes .
if the tank circuit is at cryogenic temperatures ( 4 k ) , kinetic energy of the hci is dissipated by the circuit , thus effectively cooling the ions .
since the cooling time varies with the charge state @xmath30 of the ions as @xmath31 , this cooling scheme is very effective for hci @xcite .
after the cooling procedure , the hci will be focussed into a smaller cloud using the rotating wall technique @xcite .
if the coupling of an ion plasma in a penning trap is strong enough , the density of the ion cloud depends on its global rotation frequency . by applying rf voltages to a segmented ring electrode ,
the radial electric quadrupole field will rotate and drive the ion cloud .
there are two limits for the rotation frequency @xmath32 .
the lower limit , which leads to the minimal density , is reached when @xmath32 equals the single - ion magnetron frequency @xmath33 . at the upper limit , when @xmath32 is set to half the cyclotron frequency @xmath34 , the density is maximum ( brillouin limit ) .
( see _ e.g. _
@xcite for the equations of motion of an ion in a penning trap . ) realistic values for the penning trap are : a magnetic field of 6 t , an applied potential of 500 v , an ion cloud temperature of 4 k , and a trap parameter @xmath35 mm ( see ref @xcite ) .
these values lead to the trap frequencies @xmath36 khz , @xmath37 mhz , and an axial frequency @xmath38 mhz .
if we set the rotation frequency to @xmath39 mhz , the number density of a cloud of @xmath5 @xmath8pb@xmath2 ions is @xmath40 @xmath41 ( the brillouin limit is @xmath42 @xmath41 ) .
such an ion cloud has a length of 6.8 mm and a diameter of 0.75 mm , which leads to an aspect ratio of 9.0 .
the debye length of this cloud is 250 nm .
the dependence of the ion cloud parameters on @xmath32 is shown in figure 4 .
@xmath8pb@xmath2 ions , plotted as a function of the rotation frequency @xmath32 .
( @xmath43 mm),width=283 ] a spectrum of the ground state hyperfine transition can be obtained by scanning the laser wavelength across the resonance while recording the fluorescence from the trapped decaying hci .
repeated measurements on a single cloud of ions can be made , as detection is not destructive . to obtain the highest spectral resolution
, the laser beam must be parallel to the magnetic field ( trap axis ) , so as to avoid the large doppler shift associated with the global rotation of the ion cloud .
laser excitation along the trap axis , on an ion cloud smaller than the laser beam , will also help to ensure that the transition is fully saturated .
an ion temperature of 4 k corresponds to a doppler width of 30 mhz . for @xmath8pb@xmath2 ions
, the wavelength of 1020 nm corresponds to an upper state lifetime of 50 ms and a linewidth of 3 hz . the laser power to fully saturate the doppler - broadened transition is roughly 3 mw and is easily reached by _
e.g. _ a ti : sapphire or ar@xmath44 pumped dye laser . if the experiment is run in a continuous mode , assuming an overall detection efficiency of @xmath45 , we expect to detect about @xmath46 photon emissions per second for a completely saturated ion cloud
. it should be possible to reduce the background signal to less than @xmath47 counts per second , yielding a typical s / n ratio of 40 .
alternatively , if the laser excitation is pulsed with a duty cycle of 200 ms ( @xmath48 ) , the signal is about @xmath49 counts per second , without any background from scattered laser light .
these values are high enough to allow easy detection and measurement of the transition wavelength .
once the signal is seen , this will allow a wavelength determination to an accuracy which far exceeds the theoretical uncertainties .
the linewidth of _
e.g. _ a ti : sapphire laser is 1 mhz at a wavelength of 1 @xmath4 m , which is much smaller than the doppler broadening of 30 mhz .
therefore the accuracy of the hfs measurement is estimated to be about @xmath50 , which is 3 orders of magnitude better than the current accuracy @xcite .
this work is supported by the european commission within the rtd programme fp5 ( hpri - ct-2001 - 50036 hitrap ) .
jrcp acknowledges the support by conacyt , sep and the ors awards scheme . | accurate measurement hyperfine splitting @xmath0 ground state hydrogen - like highly charged ions test quantum electrodynamics strong electric fields @xmath1 @xcite strong fields exist close to stripped nuclei heavy elements like pb bi u detecting fluorescence laser - excited upper hyperfine state trapped cold ion high - precision measurement splitting hci high charge states pb@xmath2 u@xmath3 relativistic energies 400 mev / u ) created in heavy ion facility gsi darmstadt hci injected into experimental storage ring decelerated down to 4 mev / u ) forming @xmath4s long bunches @xmath5 ions arriving every 10 seconds hitrap project @xcite bunches extracted from decelerated by linear radiofrequency stages trapped cooled in penning trap available for experiments previous measurements hfs on relativistic hci @xmath6bi@xmath7 @xcite @xmath8pb@xmath2 measurements on @xmath9ho@xmath10 @xmath11re@xmath14 resolution limited by doppler effectmeasurement @xmath0 ground state hfs trapped cold hci laser spectroscopy cryogenic uhv environment high ion cloud density large doppler shift unlimited measurement time laser spectroscopy high - accuracy measurements transition wavelengths visible region @xcite electronic transitions far uv x - ray regions @xmath0 groundstate hfs scales with atomic number @xmath15 hfs hydrogen - like hci move visible spectrum @xmath17 @xcite lifetime transition @xmath18 milliseconds @xmath17 measurement transition wavelength information qed corrections hfs spatial distribution nuclear magnetisation - effect affected core polarisation measurement allows critical tests nuclear models comparison hfs hydrogen - like lithium - like hci nuclear effects eliminated accurate measurement qed effects several candidate systems studied at hitrap radioactive isotopes challenge measure hfs @xmath0 ground state @xmath19 transition @xmath8pb@xmath2 ions @xmath20 nm @xcite laser spectroscopy hci trapped in cryogenic uhv environment ions stored long times lifetime @xmath21 ms @xcite upper hyperfine state not problemelectron capture by collisions reduced trap at cryogenic temperatures uhv conditions below mbar ground states @xmath23 nuclei versus magnetic field hydrogen atom @xmath24h highly charged lead ion @xmath8pb@xmath2 plots different scales high precision measurements hfs on hci in penning trap strong magnetic field hyperfine levels natural hfs zeeman effect illustrated in figure 1a @xmath0 ground state hfs in hydrogen nuclear spin @xmath23 hfs calculated using breit - rabi formula zero - field splitting modified by magnetic moment magnetic field strength hydrogen field 1 t zeeman splitting @xmath28 hz larger than hfs in hydrogen hz hci hfs dominates zeeman splitting orders figure 1b ground state hfs of @xmath8pb@xmath2 nuclear spin @xmath23 ground state hyperfine splittings for atomic number @xmath15 50 to 100 figure 2 calculated wavelengths of @xmath0 ground state hyperfine transition for hci with atomic number @xmath15 50 to 100heavier elements have hfs in visible region spectrum easily excited by laser systems hci extracted from hitrap cooler trap narrow average kinetic energy few ev @xmath5 ions radial energy spread reduced parallel beam @xcite hci loaded into spectroscopy trap cylindrical open - endcap penning trap with compensation electrodes perfect quadrupole potential at centre figure 3 shows layout electrodes tank circuit for resistive cooling trap loading scheme hci enter from right reflected by left capture electrode enclosed by right near trap centre cooled and compressed principle resistive cooling axial motion of hci induces image charges in electrodes detected by frequency resonant electronic tank circuit if at cryogenic temperatures kinetic energy hci dissipated ions cooling time varies with charge state ions effective for hci @xcite after hci focussed into smaller cloud using rotating wall technique if coupling ion plasma strong density ion cloud depends on global rotation frequency applying rf voltages to segmented ring electrode radial electric quadrupole field ion cloud two limits for rotation frequency @xmath32 lower limit minimal density reached when @xmath32 equals ion magnetron frequency @xmath33 upper limit @xmath32 half cyclotron frequency @xmath34 density maximum brillouin limit see @xcite for equations motion ion in penning trap realistic values for magnetic field 6 t applied potential 500 v ion cloud temperature 4 k trap parameter @xmath35 mm values lead to trap frequencies @xmath36 khz @xmath37 mhz axial frequency @xmath38 mhz rotation frequency to @xmath39 mhz density of cloud @xmath5 ions is @xmath40 @xmath41 brillouin limit @xmath42 ion cloud length 6.8 mm diameter 0.75 mm aspect ratio 9.0 debye length 250 nm dependence ion cloud parameters on @xmath32 shown in figure 4 function rotation frequency @xmath32 spectrum ground state hyperfine transition obtained by scanning laser wavelength recording fluorescence decaying hci repeated measurements on single cloud not destructive highest spectral resolution laser beam parallel to magnetic field avoid large doppler shift rotationlaser excitation trap axis ion cloud smaller than beam transition ion temperature 4 k doppler width 30 mhz @xmath8pb@xmath2 ions wavelength 1020 nm upper state lifetime 50 ms linewidth 3 hz laser power saturate doppler - broadened transition 3 mw reached by ti : sapphire or ar@xmath44 pumped dye laser experiment continuous mode detection efficiency @xmath45 @xmath46 photon emissions per second saturated ion cloud reduce background signal to less than @xmath47 counts per second s / n ratio 40 laser excitation pulsed duty cycle 200 ms @xmath48 signal @xmath49 counts per second background values high easy detection measurement transition wavelength wavelength determination theoretical uncertainties linewidth of ti : sapphire laser 1 mhz wavelength 1 @xmath4 m smaller than doppler broadening 30 mhz accuracy hfs measurement about @xmath50 3 orders magnitude better than current accuracy @xcite work supported by european commission rtd programme fp5 --2001 - support conacyt sep ors awards scheme | 0.35778 | 2,600 | 1,302 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,901 | at the location of a magnetic - field feshbach resonance , a mixture gas of fermionic atoms and dimers of fermionic atom pairs is investigated in the unitarity limit where the absolute value of the scattering length is much larger than the mean distance between atoms .
the dynamic equilibrium of the mixture gases is characterized by the minimum of the gibbs free energy . for the fermionic atoms and dimers with divergent scattering length
, it is found that the fraction of the dimers based on a very simple theory agrees with the high fraction of zero - momentum molecules observed in a recent experiment ( m. w. zwierlein et al , phys .
rev .
lett .
92 , 120403 ( 2004 ) ) .
the dimeric gas can be also used to interpret the frequency of the radial breathing mode observed in the experiment by j. kinast et al ( phys
. rev .
lett .
92 , 150402 ( 2004 ) ) .
pacs numbers : 03.75.ss , 05.30.fk , 05.30.jp , 03.75.hh keywords : fermi gas , dimeric gas , feshbach resonance , ultracold | with the remarkable development of the cooling technique for two - component atomic fermi gases and magnetic - field feshbach resonance @xcite which can change both the strength and sign of the atomic interaction characterized by the scattering length @xmath0 @xcite , experiments have explored the crossover region between the strongly attractive and repulsive interaction . for the spin mixture of the fermionic atoms , there would be dimers of fermionic atom pairs in different form dependent on the attractive or repulsive interaction between atoms .
on the side of repulsive interaction ( bec side ) , there exists molecule which is a short - range fermionic atom pairs @xcite .
in several recent experiments @xcite , the evidence for bose - einstein condensates of diatomic molecules has been given .
on the side of attractive interaction ( bcs side ) , one expects that the dimer is in a state of long - range fermionic pairs analogously to the electronic cooper pairs .
the magnetic - field feshbach resonance gives us an important opportunity to investigate the pairing phenomena in the ultracold fermi gases especially the bcs - bec crossover which has been discussed in a lot of theoretical investigations @xcite and experimental researches jin - fermion , mit - fermion , grimm , salomon , thomas , grimm1,thomas - c2,cheng , thomas - heat such as condensate fraction @xcite , collective excitations @xcite , pairing gap @xcite and the recent measurement of heat capacity @xcite . in the bcs - bec crossover ,
a particular interesting problem is the properties of the ultracold gases at the location of the feshbach resonance where the scattering length between atoms is divergent . at or extremely close to the location of the feshbach resonance ,
the absolute value of the scattering length @xmath0 can be comparable to or even much larger than the average distance @xmath1 between particles .
in this situation , the ultracold gas can be described in the unitarity limit carlson , heiselberg , ho1,ho , ghem where there is a universal behavior for the system .
the feshbach resonant technique has given us the experimental means to investigate the ultracold gas with @xmath2 .
on resonance , the fraction of dimers in zero - momentum state is investigated experimentally in @xcite after the conversion of pairs of atoms into bound molecules .
the experiment by mit group @xcite shows that there is a high fraction of dimers of fermionic atoms extremely close to the feshbach resonance . on resonance , the frequency of the radial breathing mode is given in @xcite by observing the collective oscillations of the system . in the present work , based on a mixture of the atomic and dimeric gases in the unitarity limit @xmath3
, a very simple theory is developed to explain the recent experimental results in @xcite and thomas at the location of the feshbach resonance .
in the present experiments on bcs - bec crossover , an equal mixture of fermionic atoms in two different spin states are confined in a harmonic trap to realize atomic collisions . in thermal equilibrium ,
the system comprises fermionic atoms and dimers , and its dynamic equilibrium is characterized by the fact that the gibbs free energy @xmath4 of the system is a minimum . assuming that @xmath5 and @xmath6 being the chemical potential of the fermi gases and @xmath7 being the chemical potential of the dimeric gas
, the minimum of the gibbs free energy means that @xmath8 the chemical potential of the dimeric gas is @xmath9 with @xmath10 being the dimeric energy and @xmath11 being the contribution to the chemical potential due to the thermal equilibrium of the dimeric gas . assuming that @xmath12 is the total density distribution of the fermi gases without the presence of dimers and @xmath13 is the fraction of the dimers immersed in the ultracold fermi gases , the density distribution of the dimeric gas @xmath14 and fermi gas @xmath15 ( and @xmath16 ) in a spin state are respectively given by @xmath17 and @xmath18 . for the unitarity limit @xmath3
, there is a _ universality hypothesis _ ( see @xcite ) _ _ _ _ that although the scattering length @xmath0 will play an important role , it will not appear in the final result of a physical quantity such as chemical potential because it can be regarded as infinity . in this case , the length scale @xmath19 rather than @xmath0 will appear in the final result of a physical quantity which means a universal behavior for a system . by using the universality hypothesis and local density approximation , at zero temperature
, the chemical potential @xmath5 ( @xmath20 ) of the fermi gas is given by @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the external potential of the fermionic atoms . without @xmath23 ,
the above expression gives the chemical potential of an ideal fermi gas in the local density approximation .
the parameter @xmath23 shows the role of the extremely large scattering length @xmath0 in the unitarity limit .
the parameter @xmath23 was firstly measured in @xcite with a careful experimental investigation of the strongly interacting degenerate two - component fermi gases near the feshbach resonance .
@xmath23 has been also calculated with different theoretical methods @xcite .
the scattering length @xmath24 ( @xmath25 ) @xcite of the dimers is comparable to the scattering length @xmath0 between fermionic atoms , thus the dimeric gas will also show a universal behavior on resonance . in the unitarity limit , for the bosonic dimer gas , the scattering length @xmath24 should not appear in the final result of a physical quantity too . according to the universality hypothesis
, we assume here that the bosonic dimer gas shows an analogous universal behavior with the fermi gas ( see also @xcite ) . based on this assumption
, one has the chemical potential for the dimeric gas at zero temperature @xmath26 the parameter @xmath27 in @xmath7 is also due to the large scattering length @xmath24 between dimers and it can be calculated in the unitarity limit . near the feshbach resonance , the dimeric energy @xmath28 .
thus , on resonance , @xmath10 can be omitted in the above expression . from the dynamic equilibrium condition @xmath29 , one gets the following general equation to determine the fraction of dimers at zero temperature and feshbach resonance : @xmath30 where @xmath31 .
we show the relation between the fraction of dimers @xmath13 and different value of @xmath32 in fig . 1 . in the presence of the dimers ,
the chemical potential of the system is obviously lower than the case without the dimers .
thus , the mixture gas of the atoms and dimers is a stable state of the system . for @xmath33 , there are three important characteristics for the dimeric gas : \(i ) _ the above result for the fraction of the dimeric gas is a general result once the system is in the unitarity limit . _
\(ii ) _ there is a quite high fraction of the dimers as shown in fig.1 .
_ in the present experiments , the fraction of dimers is determined by the molecules in zero - momentum state after a fast magnetic field transfer ( the magnetic field is swept below the feshbach resonant magnetic field @xmath34 so that the scattering length between fermionic atoms becomes positive ) to create bound molecules from the dimers . after the dimer - molecule conversion , in @xcite the maximum fraction of the molecules in zero - momentum state is observed to be @xmath35 which agrees with our theoretical result . from this experimental result , @xmath32 is estimated to be @xmath36 .
\(iii ) _ the dimer comprising two fermionic atoms is quite stable .
_ at zero temperature , the dimeric gas is immersed in the degenerate fermi gases . due to
pauli blocking comes from the degenerate fermi gases , any dimer can not be dissociated into two fermionic atoms once the equilibrium is attained so that @xmath37 .
in fact , the stability of the dimeric gas is consistent with the experiment @xcite that extremely close to the feshbach resonance there is no obvious decreasing of the molecules in zero - momentum state after the dimer - molecule conversion process even after @xmath38 hold time of the final magnetic field . due to the stability and pauli blocking
, the dimer - molecule conversion will always convert the fermionic atom pairs in a same dimer into bound molecules .
thus at zero temperature , all the dimers will be converted into molecules with zero - momentum state during the dimer - molecule conversion process .
this means that the fraction of dimers in thermal equilibrium investigated here can be used to explain the experimental result of the fraction of zero - momentum molecules after the dimer - molecule conversion . which can be calculated in the unitarity limit .
the high fraction of the dimers agrees with the experiment @xcite where the maximum fraction of the molecules in zero - momentum state is observed to be @xmath35 after the dimers are converted into molecules .
the dashed line shows the effect of the existence of the dimeric gas on the width of gases confined in the optical trap .
we see that the existence of dimers has an obvious effect of decreasing the width of the gases in the trap . ] in a recent experiment @xcite , the frequency of a radial breathing mode is observed extremely close to the feshbach resonance and found to agree well with the theoretical predication based on hydrodynamic theory in the unitarity limit @xcite . combining with the experimental result in @xcite ( also shown in the present work ) that there is a high fraction of molecules in zero - momentum state after the dimer - molecule conversion process ,
we see that the dimeric gas should play a dominant role in determining the frequency of collective oscillations due to its high fraction . for the radial breathing mode
, the agreement of the experiment with theoretical result in the unitarity limit shows that it is reasonable to describe the bosonic dimer gas by the unitarity hypothesis which is used to give eq .
( [ chemical - dimer ] ) .
in fact , an analogous form of eq .
( chemical - dimer ) is used to calculate the frequency of the radial breathing mode in @xcite , whose result agrees well with the experiment in @xcite .
different from the theoretical model in @xcite , however , in the present work on resonance , the dimeric gas should play a dominant role in the frequency of the collective oscillations at zero temperature , rather than the fermi gases . on resonance ,
the mixture of the fermionic atoms and dimers will play a role in the width of the gases confined in the harmonic trap . from the dynamic equilibrium @xmath37 ,
the width of the fermi gas is equal to that of the dimeric gas .
assume that @xmath39 is the width of the mixture gases for the atoms and dimers , while @xmath40 is the width of the gases without considering the existence of the dimers .
after a simple calculation , one has the ratio @xmath41 . the dashed line in fig.1 shows @xmath42 as a function of @xmath32 .
we see that the existence of dimers in dynamic equilibrium will decrease the width of the gases .
in summary , the role of the dimers of fermionic atoms is discussed extremely close to the feshbach resonance where both the fermionic atoms and dimers show a universal behavior based on the universality hypothesis .
the dynamic equilibrium of the mixed atom - dimer gas is considered for the case of a harmonic trap through the analysis of the gibbs free energy .
based on this simple theoretical model , it is found that the high fraction of the stable dimeric gas in the present work agrees well with the experiment mit - fermion where there is a high fraction of molecules in zero - momentum state after the conversion of the dimers into molecules . extremely close to the feshbach resonance , the dimeric gas plays a dominant role for the frequency of the radial breathing mode observed in @xcite .
on resonance , the stability of the dimeric gas would be useful in the creation of molecular bec on the bec side and condensate of atomic cooper pairs on the bcs side . crossing the feshbach resonant magnetic field @xmath34 slowly from above ( or below ) would contribute to the creation of molecular bec ( or condensate of atomic cooper pairs ) because there is a formation of a stable dimeric gas when @xmath34 is swept cross slowly .
for example , in @xcite , the molecular bec is created after the magnetic field is swept slowly from above to below @xmath34 . c. a. regal , m. greiner , and d. s. jin , phys .
92 ( 2004 ) 083201 ; c. a. regal , c. ticknor , j. l. bohn , and d. s. jin , nature 424 ( 2003 ) 47 ; j. cubizolles , t. bourdel , s. j. j. m. f. kokkelmans , g. v. shlyapnikov , and c. salomon , phys .
91 ( 2003 ) 240401 ; k. e. strecker , g. b. partridge , and r. g. hulet , phys .
91 ( 2003 ) 080406 ; s. jochim , m. bartenstein , a. altmeyer , g. hendl , c. chin , j. h. denschlag , and r. grimm , phys . rev .
91 ( 2003 ) 240402 . | development cooling technique for two - component atomic fermi gases magnetic - field feshbach resonance @xcite strength sign atomic interaction scattering length experiments explored crossover region between attractive and repulsive interaction spin mixture fermionic atoms dimers fermionic atom pairs different form dependent on attractive or repulsive interaction side repulsive interaction side short - range fermionic atom pairs @xcite recent experiments evidence for bose - einstein condensates of diatomic molecules given side attractive interaction side expects dimer long - range fermionic pairs electronic cooper pairs magnetic - field feshbach resonance investigate pairing phenomena in ultracold fermi gases bcs - bec crossover discussed in theoretical investigations experimental researches condensate fraction collective excitations pairing gap recent measurement heat capacity bcs - bec crossover problem properties ultracold gases at location feshbach resonance scattering length between atoms divergent absolute value scattering length @xmath0 comparable to or larger than average distance @xmath1 between particlesultracold gas described in unitarity limit carlson heiselberg ghem universal behavior system feshbach resonant technique ultracold gas with @xmath2 fraction of dimers in zero - momentum state investigated in @xcite after conversion molecules experiment mit group high fraction of dimers fermionic atoms close to feshbach resonance frequency radial breathing mode @xcite observing collective oscillations mixture atomic dimeric gases in unitarity limit @xmath3 theory experimental results in @xcite thomas feshbach resonance experiments bcs - bec crossover equal mixture of fermionic atoms in spin states confined in harmonic trap atomic collisions thermal equilibrium system comprises fermionic atoms dimers dynamic equilibrium gibbs free energy @xmath4 minimum @xmath5 @xmath6 chemical potential fermi gases @xmath7 dimeric gas minimum gibbs free energy means chemical potential dimeric gas @xmath9 @xmath10 dimeric energy @xmath11 contribution to chemical potential thermal equilibrium dimeric@xmath12 total density fermi gases without dimers @xmath13 fraction dimers immersed in ultracold fermi gases density distribution dimeric gas @xmath14 fermi gas @xmath15 in spin state given by @xmath17 @xmath18 unitarity limit @xmath3 universality hypothesis scattering length @xmath0 not appear in final result infinity length scale @xmath19 in final result universal behavior for system at zero temperature chemical potential @xmath5 @xmath20 ) fermi gas given by @xmath21 @xmath22 external potential fermionic atoms without @xmath23 chemical potential ideal fermi gas in local density approximation parameter @xmath23 shows role large scattering length @xmath0 in unitarity limit measured in @xcite interacting degenerate two - component fermi gases near feshbach resonance calculated with theoretical methods scattering length @xmath24 @xmath25 ) @xcite of dimers comparable to @xmath0 between fermionic atoms dimeric gas universal behavior on resonance in unitarity limit for bosonic dimer gas scattering length @xmath24 not appear in final resultuniversality hypothesis bosonic dimer gas analogous behavior with fermi gas @xcite chemical potential for dimeric gas at zero temperature @xmath26 parameter @xmath27 @xmath7 due to large scattering length @xmath24 between dimers calculated in unitarity limit near feshbach resonance dimeric energy @xmath28 on resonance @xmath10 omitted dynamic equilibrium condition @xmath29 general equation fraction of dimers at zero temperature feshbach resonance : @xmath30 @xmath31 relation between fraction of dimers @xmath13 and value of @xmath32 in fig . 1 presence dimers chemical potential lower than without dimers mixture gas of atoms dimers stable state @xmath33 three characteristics for dimeric gas : result fraction general result in unitarity limit high fraction of dimers in fig.1 experiments fraction of dimers determined by molecules in zero - momentum state after fast magnetic field transfer scattering length atoms positive bound molecules conversion in @xcite maximum fraction of molecules in zero - momentum state @xmath35 agrees with theoretical resultexperimental result @xmath32 estimated @xmath36 dimer two fermionic atoms stable at zero temperature dimeric gas immersed in degenerate fermi gases pauli blocking dimer dissociated into two fermionic atoms equilibrium attained @xmath37 stability dimeric gas consistent with experiment @xcite feshbach resonance no decreasing molecules in zero - momentum state after dimer - molecule conversion @xmath38 final magnetic field stability pauli blocking dimer - molecule conversion fermionic atom pairs into bound molecules at zero temperature all dimers converted into molecules zero - momentum state fraction of dimers in thermal equilibrium explain experimental result fraction zero - momentum molecules after conversion calculated in unitarity limit high fraction dimers agrees with experiment @xcite maximum fraction in zero - momentum state @xmath35 after dimers converted molecules line shows effect dimeric gas on width gases in optical trap width gases trap recent experiment @xcite frequency of radial breathing mode observed close to feshbach resonance with theoretical predication hydrodynamic theory in unitarity limit @xciteexperimental result in @xcite present work high fraction of molecules in zero - momentum state after dimer - molecule conversion dimeric gas dominant role frequency oscillations high fraction radial breathing mode agreement experiment with theoretical result unitarity limit describe bosonic dimer gas by unitarity hypothesis eq . chemical - dimer ] ) analogous form frequency radial breathing mode in @xcite result agrees with experiment @xcite different model present work resonance dimeric gas dominant role in frequency collective oscillations at zero temperature fermi gases resonance mixture fermionic atoms dimers role width gases in harmonic trap dynamic equilibrium @xmath37 width fermi gas equal to dimeric gas @xmath39 width mixture gases for atoms and dimers @xmath40 width gases without dimers calculation ratio @xmath41 fig.1 shows @xmath42 function of @xmath32 existence of dimers in dynamic equilibrium width gases role of dimers of fermionic atoms close to feshbach resonance fermionic atoms dimers show universal behavior based universality hypothesisdynamic equilibrium mixed atom - dimer gas considered harmonic trap analysis gibbs free energy high fraction stable dimeric gas agrees experiment mit - fermion high fraction molecules zero - momentum state after conversion dimers molecules close feshbach resonance dimeric gas dominant role frequency radial breathing mode @xcite resonance stability dimeric gas useful creation molecular bec bec side condensate atomic cooper pairs bcs side crossing feshbach resonant magnetic field @xmath34 slowly creation molecular bec formation stable dimeric gas @xmath34 swept @xcite molecular bec created after magnetic field swept slowly above to below @xmath34 c a. regal m greiner d s. jin phys . 92 ( 2004 ) 083201 ; regal ticknor bohn jin nature 424 ( 2003 ) 47 ; cubizolles kokkelmans shlyapnikov salomon phys . 91 ( 2003 ) 240401 ; strecker partridge g hulet phys . 91 ( 2003 ) 080406 ; jochim bartenstein altmeyer hendl chin denschlaggrimm phys 91 2003 240402 | 0.49609 | 2,999 | 1,527 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,912 | during the last decade , the precision in the tracking of spacecraft has constantly improved .
the discovery of few astrometric anomalies , such as the pioneer and earth flyby anomalies , stimulated further analysis of the operative modeling currently adopted in deep space navigation ( dsn ) .
our study shows that some traditional approximations lead to neglect tiny terms that could have consequences in the orbit determination of a probe in specific configurations such as during an earth flyby .
therefore , we suggest here a way to improve the light time calculation used for probe tracking . | s. bertone@xmath0 , c. le poncin lafitte@xmath1 , v. lainey@xmath2 and m .- c .
angonin@xmath1@xmath1 syrte - obs .
de paris - cnrs / umr8630 , upmc , france + @xmath3 inaf - astronomical observatory of turin , university of turin , italy + @xmath2 imcce - obs . de paris - cnrs / umr8028 , upmc , france e - mail : stefano.bertone@obspm.fr deep space data processing during the last decade has revealed the presence of anomalies in the form of unexpected accelerations in the trajectory of probes @xcite .
the hypothesis made trying to solve this puzzle can be summarized in two main approaches : whether these anomalies are the manifestation of some new physics @xcite , or something is mismodeled in the data processing @xcite .
+ we investigate moyer s book @xcite , which describes the relativistic framework used by space agencies for data processing .
we know that the ephemeris of a space mission is built from subsequent measures involving the light time of a signal traveling between the earth and the probe and the solution of the inverse problem . since the ephemeris is used for both operational ( space probe navigation ) and scientific goals ( measurements for testing fundamental physics ) , a well defined model is then mandatory for both the interpretation of physical data and the orbit reconstruction . in this article
, we suggest an improvement of the light time modeling focusing on the treatment of the so - called `` transponder delay '' .
+ this paper is structured as follows .
+ in section 2 , we give a brief overview of light time computation as described by the moyer s book ; we show that the transponder s delay ( i.e. the time delay between the reception and retransmission of the light signal on board the satellite ) is not accurately taken into account in this model
. in section 3 we present an alternative , more precise , modeling . finally , in section 4 , we compare both modelings to highlight their differences and give some conclusions in section 5 .
+ throughout this work we will suppose that space - time is covered by some global barycentric coordinates system @xmath4 , with @xmath5 , @xmath6 being the speed of light in vacuum , @xmath7 a time coordinate and @xmath8 .
greek indices run from 0 to 3 , and latin indices from 1 to 3 . here
@xmath9/@xmath10 represents the position / velocity of body @xmath11 at time @xmath7 , where @xmath11 can take the value @xmath12 ( ground station ) or @xmath13 ( spacecraft ) .
primed values are related to the _ moyer s modeling _ , while we will generally use non - primed values for our proposed modeling .
deep space navigation is based on the exchange of light signals between a probe and at least one observing ground station .
the calculation of a coordinate light time , as resumed from @xcite , is quite simple : a clock starts counting as an uplink signal is emitted from ground at @xmath14 .
the signal is received by the probe at @xmath15 and then , after a short delay , reemitted towards the earth where it is received by a ground station at @xmath16 .
the clock stops counting and gives the round - trip light time @xmath17 where @xmath18 , @xmath6 is the speed of light , @xmath19 is the shapiro delay @xcite , while @xmath20 and @xmath21 are the transponder delay and other corrections ( ex : atmospheric delay ... ) that we will not detail here , respectively .
the light time @xmath22 is then used to compute two physical quantities : * the _ ranging _ , related to the distance between the probe and the ground station can be computed using @xmath23 * the _ doppler _ , related to the velocity of the probe with respect to the earth , is obtained by differentiating two successive light time measurements , @xmath24 and @xmath25 , during a given count interval @xmath26 .
it has been showed that @xmath27 where @xmath28 is a transponder s ratio applied to the downlink signal when it is reemitted towards the earth and @xmath29 .
+ since the _ doppler _ signal results from the differentiation of the _ ranging _ signal , all constant or slowly changing terms like @xmath20 and @xmath21 obviously cancel out in this modeling .
nevertheless , the electronic delay of some microseconds @xmath20 due to on board processing of the incoming signal requires to consider a different position of the spacecraft at reemission time . in the following ,
we study its consequences on light time modeling for _ ranging _ and _ doppler _ calculations .
+ for this purpose , we introduce an improved light time model @xmath30 taking into account four events ( one more with respect to moyer s model ) : the emission from the ground station at @xmath31 , the reception by the probe at @xmath32 , the reemission at @xmath33 and the reception at ground at @xmath34 .
the additional event @xmath35 accounts for this small delay of @xmath20@xmath36@xmath37 @xmath38 ( at least for modern spacecraft ) so that we get @xmath39 similarly to section [ sec : moyermodel ] , we then use @xmath30 to compute _ ranging _ @xmath40 and _ doppler _ @xmath41 observables as to compare the two modelings presented in sections [ sec : moyermodel ] and [ sec : ourmodel ] , we shall define the difference between the computed light times = - = t_1 - t_1 , @xmath46 and @xmath47 .
let us then analyze the supplementary event @xmath35 . this term is implicitly related to @xmath20 by the first order development ^sc_3=^sc_2+t ^sc_2 + o ( t^2 ) , the implications of this mismodeling are given by @xmath48 where we used eq . , eq . and eq . into eq . and defining @xmath49 as the minkowskian direction between the ground station and the probe .
+ equation highlights the presence of an extra non - constant term , directly proportional to the transponder delay and neglected in moyer s model .
this term also depends on the position and velocity of both the probe and the ground station .
neglecting it would actually lead to a wrong determination of the epoch @xmath50 and to an error in both _ ranging _ and _
doppler_. in order to evaluate the magnitude of the additional term in eq .
, we computed @xmath51 ( giving the difference between the _ ranging _ calculated with the two models ) and @xmath52 ( related to the difference of the _ doppler _ calculated by the two models ) for the observation of a probe .
we used the real orbit of some probes ( rosetta , near , cassini , galileo ) during their earth flyby , which is a particularly favorable configuration .
we used the naif / spice toolkit @xcite to retrieve the ephemeris for probes and planets to be used in the computation .
computing eq . and
it s time derivative for the near probe during its earth flyby on the 23 january 1998 , we found a difference of the order of some @xmath53 for the probe distance @xmath54 calculated by the two models and a difference up to several @xmath55 at the instant of maximum approach for its velocity .
these results are shown in figures [ fig : range ] and[fig : dop ] .
+ in order to highlight the high variability of the transponder delay effect on doppler measurements , we computed @xmath56 for different probes in different configurations with respect to the observing station .
the results are exposed in figure [ fig : dop1 ] and show that this delay can not be simply calibrated at the level of light time calculation nor neglected in the _ doppler _ calculation .
it seems obvious from our results that the influence of the transponder delay can not be reduced to a simple calibration without taking some precautions .
it is indeed responsible for a tiny effect on the computation of light time and has an impact on both _ ranging _ and _ doppler _ determination .
we represent it by a more complete modeling , considering four epochs instead of three . in order to test the amplitude and variability of this effect on real data ,
we compute its influence on some real probe - ground station configurations during recent earth flybys ( near , rosetta , cassini and galileo ) .
+ the observables calculated using moyer s model and our improved model show differences of the order of several @xmath53 and of @xmath57 for the _ ranging _ and the _ doppler _ , respectively .
such an error is acceptable for most operational goals at present .
anyway , we shall highlight that this error is directly proportional to the transponder delay and that for past missions , whose data are still largely used for scientific purposes , transponders were more than @xmath58 times slower that today . in the future too , increasing ephemeris precision @xcite should be followed by the development of faster transponders or by the use of a more precise model .
_ acknowledgements .
_ the authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their detailed review , which allowed to improve the paper .
s. bertone and c. le poncin - lafitte are grateful to the financial support of cnrs / gram .
j. d. anderson , j. k. campbell , j. e. ekelund , j. ellis , and j. f. jordan . _ anomalous orbital - energy changes observed during spacecraft flybys of earth .
_ physical review letters , 100(9):091102 , march 2008 .
j. d. anderson , p. a. laing , e. l. lau , a. s. liu , m. m. nieto , and s. g. turyshev .
_ indication , from pioneer 10/11 , galileo , and ulysses data , of an apparent anomalous , weak , long - range acceleration .
_ physical review letters , 81:28582861 , october 1998 .
l. iess , m. di benedetto , n. james , m. mercolino , l. simone , and p. tortora .
_ astra : interdisciplinary study on enhancement of the end - to - end accuracy for spacecraft tracking techniques .
_ acta astronautica , volume 94 , issue 2 , p. 699 - 707 | s. bertone@xmath0 c. le poncin lafitte@xmath1 v. lainey@xmath2 m .- c . angonin@xmath1 syrte - obs . de paris - cnrs / umr8630 upmc, france @xmath3 inaf - astronomical observatory of turin university of turin , italy @xmath2 imcce - obs . de paris - cnrs / umr8028 upmc france stefano.bertone@obspm.fr deep space data processing revealed anomalies unexpected accelerations in trajectory probes @xcite hypothesis two approaches anomalies new physics or mismodeled data processing investigate moyer s book @xcite relativistic framework space agencies for data processing ephemeris of space mission built from measures light time of signal earth probe solution inverse problem ephemeris used for operational scientific goals defined model mandatory for interpretation physical data orbit reconstruction suggest improvement of light time modeling transponder delay '' paper structured section 2 overview of light time computation moyer s book transponder s delay not taken in model section 3 alternative more precise modelingsection 4 compare modelings highlight differences conclusions section 5 space - time covered by global barycentric coordinates system @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 speed light vacuum @xmath7 time coordinate @xmath8 greek indices 0 to 3 latin indices 1 to 3 @xmath9/@xmath10 position velocity body @xmath11 time @xmath7 @xmath11 @xmath12 ground station or @xmath13 spacecraft primed values related moyer s modeling non - primed values proposed modeling deep space navigation exchange light signals probe ground station calculation coordinate light time @xcite simple clock starts counting uplink signal emitted from ground @xmath14 received by probe at @xmath15 reemitted earth received ground station @xmath16 clock stops round - trip light time @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath6 speed of light @xmath19 shapiro delay @xmath20 @xmath21 transponder delay corrections atmospheric delaylight time @xmath22 used compute two physical quantities _ ranging _ distance between probe ground station computed using @xmath23 _ doppler _ velocity probe earth obtained differentiating two light time measurements @xmath24 @xmath25 during count interval @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 transponder s ratio to downlink signal reemitted towards earth @xmath29 _ doppler _ signal results from differentiation _ ranging _ signal constant changing terms like @xmath20 @xmath21 cancel out modeling electronic delay microseconds @xmath20 due to processing incoming signal requires different position spacecraft at reemission time study consequences on light time modeling for _ ranging _ _ doppler _ calculations introduce improved light time model @xmath30 four events emission from ground @xmath31 reception probe reemission reception at ground @xmath34 additional event @xmath35 accounts for small delay @xmath20 use @xmath30 to compute _ ranging _ @xmath40 _ doppler _ @xmath41 observables modelings define difference between computed light times = t_1 - t_1 @xmath46 and @xmath47analyze supplementary event @xmath35 related to @xmath20 first order development ^sc_3=^sc_2+t ^sc_2 + o ( t^2 ) implications by @xmath48 used eq @xmath49 as minkowskian direction between ground station probe equation highlights extra non - constant term proportional to transponder delay neglected in moyer s model depends on position velocity probe ground station neglecting to wrong determination epoch @xmath50 error in _ ranging _ _ doppler_ evaluate magnitude additional term in eq . computed @xmath51 difference between _ ranging _ models @xmath52 difference _ doppler _ for observation probe used real orbit of probes rosetta during earth flyby favorable configuration used toolkit @xcite retrieve ephemeris for probes planets computation computing eq . time derivative for near probe earth flyby 23 january 1998 found difference of @xmath53 for probe distance @xmath54 difference @xmath55 at maximum approach velocity results shown in figures [ range dop ]highlight high variability transponder delay effect on doppler measurements computed @xmath56 for different probes configurations results exposed in figure show delay not be calibrated at light time calculation nor neglected in _ doppler _ calculation influence transponder delay reduced to calibration without precautions responsible for tiny effect on light time on _ ranging _ and _ doppler _ determination represent by complete modeling considering four epochs instead three to test amplitude variability effect on data compute influence on real probe - ground station configurations during recent earth flybys observables calculated using moyer s model and improved model show differences @xmath53 and @xmath57 for _ ranging _ and _ doppler _ error acceptable for operational goals error proportional to transponder delay past missions transponders were more than @xmath58 times slower increasing precision should be followed by faster transponders or more precise model authors grateful to anonymous referees for detailed review paper bertone. le poncin - lafitte grateful to financial support of cnrs / gram anderson campbell ekelund ellis jordananomalous orbital energy changes spacecraft flybys physical review letters 100(9):091102 march 2008 anderson laing lau liu nieto turyshev pioneer 10/11 galileo ulysses data anomalous weak long - range acceleration physical review letters 81:28582861 october 1998 l. iess di benedetto james mercolino simone p tortora astra study end - to - end accuracy spacecraft tracking acta astronautica volume 94 issue 2. 699 - | 0.360307 | 2,349 | 1,206 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,917 | we study light vector meson photoproduction at small @xmath0 on the basis of the generalized parton distribution ( gpd ) .
our results on the cross section and spin density matrix elements ( sdme ) are in fair agreement with desy experiments . | vector meson leptoproduction at large energies @xcite is one of the important processes which is sensitive to the gpds . at small @xmath0-bjorken ( @xmath0 ) the process factorizes @xcite into a hard meson leptoproduction off gluons and gpd ( fig.1 ) .
the generally used standard collinear approximation ( sca ) leads to some essential problems .
the cross section for longitudinally polarized virtual photons which predominates for the large photon virtualities exceeds the data by a large factor if calculated in the sca @xcite .
only the amplitude with a longitudinally polarized virtual photon and vector meson ( ll ) amplitude can be calculated in the sca .
the transition amplitudes for transversally polarized photons @xmath1 ( tt ) and @xmath2 ( tl ) exhibit in the sca the infrared singularities @xcite which breakdown factorization .
here we use the modified perturbative approach ( mpa ) @xcite which includes the quark transverse degrees of freedom accompanied by sudakov suppressions . in the mpa
one can solve all mentioned problems .
transverse quark degrees of freedom and sudakov factors suppress the contribution from the end - point region in the ll amplitude .
the transverse quark momentum regularizes the end - point singularities in tt and tl amplitudes .
this leads to reasonable agreement of our results with h1 and zeus data @xcite for electroproduced @xmath3 and @xmath4 mesons at small @xmath0 @xcite . in this report
, we discuss the spin effects in the @xmath3 meson leptoproduction . within the mpa
we calculate the three @xmath5 , @xmath6 and @xmath7 transition amplitudes , and afterwards cross sections and sdme .
the leading - twist wave function @xmath8 describes the longitudinally polarized vector mesons . to study the transversally polarized light mesons
, we use the higher order @xmath9- dependent wave function @xmath10 proposed in @xcite @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 \phi'_v(k,\tau){\nonumber}.\ ] ] here @xmath14 is a polarization of the vector meson with momentum @xmath15 , @xmath16 is the fraction of the meson momentum carried by the quark , @xmath17 is the scale in the higher order wave function which should be about the meson mass @xmath18 .
we use here @xmath19 the gluon contribution to the leptoproduction amplitudes for @xmath20 and positive proton helicity reads as a convolution of the hard subprocess amplitude @xmath21 and a large distance unpolarized @xmath22 and polarized @xmath23 gluon gpds ( fig.1 ) : @xmath24\ , h^g(\xb,\xi , t ) \right . { \nonumber}\\ & + & \hspace{2.5mm}\left .
\left[\,{\cal h}^v_{\mu'+,\mu + } \ , - { \cal h}^v_{\mu'-,\mu -}\,\right]\ , \widetilde{h}^g(\xb,\xi ,
t)\ , \right\}\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath25 ( @xmath26 ) denotes the helicity of the photon ( meson ) , @xmath27 is the momentum fraction of the transversally polarized gluons and the skewness @xmath28 is related to bjorken-@xmath0 by @xmath29 .
the flavor factors are @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
the polarized @xmath23 gpd at small @xmath27 is much smaller than the unpolarized gpd @xmath32 and will be important in the @xmath33 asymmetry only .
the subprocess amplitude @xmath21 is represented as the contraction of the hard part @xmath34 , which is calculated perturbatively , and the non - perturbative meson wave function @xmath35 @xmath36 the wave function is chosen in gaussian form @xmath37}\,.\ ] ] here @xmath38 , @xmath39 is the decay coupling constant and the @xmath40 parameter determines the value of average transverse momentum of the quark in the vector meson .
generally , values of @xmath41 are different for longitudinal and transverse polarization of the meson .
the subprocess amplitude is calculated within the mpa @xcite where we keep the @xmath42 terms in the denominators of the amplitudes and the numerator of the tt amplitude .
the gluonic corrections are treated in the form of the sudakov factors which additionally suppress the end - point integration regions .
the model leads to the following hierarchy of the amplitudes : @xmath43 note , that the @xmath44 and @xmath45 transitions are small and neglected in our analysis .
the gpd is a complicated function which depends on three variables .
for the small momentum transfer @xmath46 we use the double distribution form @xcite @xmath47\ , \frac{\beta}{\xi}\,f(\beta,\alpha=\frac{\xb-\beta}{\xi},t)\ ] ] with the simple factorizing ansatz for the double distributions @xmath48 @xmath49}{(1-|\beta|)^{3}}.\ ] ] in this model , we calculate gpd @xcite through the gluon distribution @xmath50 and take the cteq5 m results @xcite for it .
for the three @xmath28 values the gluon gpd is shown in fig .
the @xmath51- dependence of the amplitudes is important in analyses of experimental data . for simplicity
we parameterize it in the exponential form @xmath52 for @xmath53 transitions .
experimentally , only the slope of the @xmath54 cross section is measured whereas information about individual slopes @xmath55 is absent .
we suppose that @xmath56 .
estimations for the @xmath3 meson production amplitudes are obtained using @xmath57 , @xmath58 ; @xmath59 ; @xmath60 . [ cols="^,^ " , ] @xmath61 ^ 2 $ ] the @xmath62 dependence of sdme on the @xmath3 production at @xmath63 and @xmath64 .
data are taken from h1 and zeus . in fig.4
, we present our results for the three sdme at desy energy range . description of experimental data is reasonable .
our results for other sdme can be found in @xcite the @xmath33 asymmetry for a longitudinally polarized beam and target is sensitive to the polarized gpd .
really , the leading term in the @xmath33 asymmetry integrated over the azimuthal angle is determined through the interference between the unpolarized gpd @xmath32 and the polarized @xmath23 distributions .
we expect a small value for the @xmath33 asymmetry at high energies because it is of the order of the ratio @xmath65 which is small at low @xmath0 .
gluon contribution to the @xmath33 asymmetry of vector meson production at @xmath66 ( solid line ) and @xmath67 ( dashed line ) ; @xmath68 .
the shaded bands reflect the uncertainties in the @xmath33 due to the error in @xmath69 [ yourname_fig4 ] at compass energies @xmath70 the gluon contribution to the @xmath33 asymmetry of vector meson production is small ( fig.5 ) . at hermes energies @xmath71 the major contribution to
the amplitudes comes from the region @xmath72 where @xmath73 is not small , which leads to a large value of the @xmath33 .
the asymmetry is shown in fig.5 together with the uncertainties in our predictions due to the error in the polarized gluon distribution .
note that our predictions should be valid for the @xmath4 production . in the case of @xmath3 production
the polarized quark gpd should be essential in the @xmath33 asymmetry in the low energy range .
light vector meson electroproduction at small @xmath0 was analyzed here within the gpd approach .
the amplitudes were calculated using the mpa with the wave function dependent on the transverse quark momentum .
the transverse quark momentum regularizes the end - point singularities in the amplitudes with transversally polarized photons .
this gives a possibility to study spin effects in vector meson production . within the gpd approach we find a fine description of the @xmath62 dependence of the cross section , @xmath74 ratio and sdme for the @xmath3 meson production at hera energies .
more results for @xmath3 and @xmath4 production can be found in @xcite .
some comparison with the two - gluon exchange model @xcite can be found in @xcite too .
we would like to point out that study of sdme gives important information on different @xmath75 hard amplitudes . by analyses of @xmath51 dependencies of sdmes
the diffraction peak slopes of the @xmath6 and @xmath7 amplitudes can be defined .
unfortunately , the data on spin observables have large experimental errors .
the new experimental results with reduced errors in sdme are extremely important .
information about polarized gluon distribution can be obtained from the @xmath33 asymmetry on @xmath4 meson production at hermes and compass energies which is sensitive to @xmath76 .
goloskokov , p. kroll : euro .
j. c*42 * ( 2005 ) 281 .
x. ji : phys .
d*55 * ( 1997 ) 7114 ; + a.v .
radyushkin : phys .
b*380 * ( 1996 ) 417 ; + j.c .
collins : _ et al .
_ , phys .
rev . d*56 * ( 1997 ) 2982 .
l. mankiewicz , g. piller and t. weigl : eur .
j. c*5 * ( 1998 ) 119 . l. mankiewicz and g. piller : phys .
rev . d*61 * ( 2000 ) 074013 ; + i.v .
anikin and o.v .
teryaev : phys .
lett . b*554 * ( 2003 ) 51
. j. botts and g. sterman : nucl .
phys . b*325 * ( 1989 ) 62 .
c. adloff et al .
[ h1 collaboration ] : eur .
j. c*13 * ( 2000 ) 371 ; + s. aid et al .
[ h1 collaboration ] : nucl .
b * 468 * ( 1996 ) 3 .
j. breitweg et al .
[ zeus collaboration ] : eur .
j. c*6 * ( 1999 ) 603 ; + s. chekanov et al .
[ zeus collaboration ] : nucl.phys . b*718 * ( 2005 ) 3 .
goloskokov , p. kroll : proc . of 16th international spin physics symposium , trieste , 2004 , world scientific , 2005 , 421 .
j. bolz , j.g .
krner and p. kroll : z. phys .
a*350*(1994 ) 145 .
i. v. musatov and a. v. radyushkin : phys .
d*61 * ( 2000 ) 074027
. j. pumplin , d. r. stump , j. huston , h. l. lai , p. nadolsky and w. k. tung : jhep * 0207 * ( 2002 ) 012 .
s. j. brodsky et al . :
d * 50 * ( 1994 ) 3134 . | vector meson leptoproduction large energies @xcite sensitive gpds small @xmath0-bjorken factorizes @xcite hard meson leptoproduction gluons gpd fig standard collinear approximation leads problems cross section longitudinally polarized virtual photons exceeds data amplitude longitudinally polarized virtual photon vector meson amplitude calculated transition amplitudes transversally polarized photons @xmath1 @xmath2 exhibit infrared singularities breakdown factorization modified perturbative approach @xcite quark transverse degrees freedom sudakov suppressions problems transverse quark degrees sudakov factors suppress contribution end - point region ll amplitude transverse quark momentum regularizes end - point singularities tt tl amplitudes agreement results with h1 zeus data electroproduced @xmath3 @xmath4 mesons small @xmath0 spin effects @xmath3 meson leptoproduction calculate @xmath5 @xmath7 transition amplitudes cross sections sdme leading - twist wave function @xmath8 describes longitudinally polarized vector mesonsstudy transversally polarized light mesons use higher order @xmath9- dependent wave function @xmath10 @xcite @xmath11 @xmath13 @xmath14 polarization vector meson momentum @xmath15 @xmath16 fraction meson momentum quark @xmath17 scale higher order wave function meson mass @xmath18 use @xmath19 gluon contribution leptoproduction amplitudes @xmath20 positive proton helicity convolution hard subprocess amplitude @xmath21 large distance unpolarized @xmath22 polarized @xmath23 gluon gpds ( fig.1 ) @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 ) helicity photon meson @xmath27 momentum fraction transversally polarized gluons skewness @xmath28 related bjorken-@xmath0 @xmath29 flavor factors @xmath30 @xmath31 polarized @xmath23 gpd small @xmath27 smaller than unpolarized gpd @xmath32 important in @xmath33 asymmetrysubprocess amplitude @xmath21 contraction hard part @xmath34 calculated perturbatively non - perturbative meson wave function @xmath35 @xmath36 wave function gaussian form @xmath37 @xmath38 decay coupling constant @xmath40 average transverse momentum quark vector meson values @xmath41 different for longitudinal transverse polarization meson subprocess amplitude calculated mpa @xcite @xmath42 terms denominators amplitudes numerator tt amplitude gluonic corrections sudakov factors suppress end - point integration regions model hierarchy amplitudes @xmath44 @xmath45 transitions small neglected gpd complicated function depends on three variables small momentum transfer @xmath46 double distribution form simple factorizing ansatz double distributions @xmath49 calculate gpd @xcite through gluon distribution @xmath50 cteq5 m results @xcite three @xmath28 values gluon gpd shown in fig . @xmath51- dependence amplitudes important experimental data parameterize exponential form @xmath52 @xmath53 transitionsslope @xmath54 cross section measured information slopes @xmath55 absent @xmath56 estimations @xmath3 meson production amplitudes using @xmath57 @xmath61 @xmath62 dependence sdme @xmath3 production @xmath63 @xmath64 data from h1 zeus.4 results three sdme at desy energy range experimental data reasonable results other sdme in @xmath33 asymmetry longitudinally polarized beam target sensitive to polarized gpd @xmath33 asymmetry angle determined interference unpolarized gpd @xmath32 polarized @xmath23 distributions expect small value @xmath33 asymmetry at high energies order ratio @xmath65 small at low @xmath0 gluon contribution @xmath33 asymmetry meson production at @xmath66 shaded bands reflect uncertainties @xmath33 error @xmath69 compass energies @xmath70 gluon contribution @xmath33 asymmetry small hermes energies @xmath71 major contribution amplitudes from region @xmath72 @xmath73 not small large value @xmath33 asymmetry shown in fig.uncertainties predictions error polarized gluon distribution predictions valid for @xmath4 production @xmath3 production polarized quark gpd essential in @xmath33 asymmetry low energy range light vector meson electroproduction at small @xmath0 analyzed gpd approach amplitudes calculated using mpa wave function transverse quark momentum regularizes end - point singularities transversally polarized photons spin effects vector meson production @xmath62 dependence cross section @xmath74 ratio sdme @xmath3 meson production at hera energies results in @xcite comparison with two - gluon exchange model study sdme information on @xmath75 hard amplitudes analyses @xmath51 dependencies sdmes diffraction peak slopes @xmath6 @xmath7 amplitudes defined data spin observables large experimental errors new results with reduced errors in sdme important information polarized gluon distribution @xmath33 asymmetry on @xmath4 meson production at hermes compass energies sensitive to @xmath76 goloskokov kroll*42 2005 ) 281 phys*55 1997 ) 7114 radyushkin 1996 ) 417 collinsphys . rev d*56 1997 ) 2982 mankiewicz piller t weigl eur j c*5 1998 ) 119 mankiewicz piller . rev d*61 2000 ) 074013 anikin teryaev . b*554 2003 ) 51 j botts sterman nucl . b*325 1989 ) 62 adloff h1 collaboration eur j. c*13 2000 ) 371 s aid nucl b 468 1996 ) breitweg zeus collaboration eur j c*6 1999 ) 603 chekanov zeus collaboration nucl.phys . b*718 2005 ) goloskokov p kroll 16th international spin physics symposium trieste 2004 world scientific 2005 421 bolz krner p kroll . a*350(1994 ) 145 musatov radyushkin . d*61 2000 ) 074027 j pumplin stump huston lai nadolsky tung 0207 2002 ) 012 brodsky d * 50 1994 ) 3134 | 0.357525 | 2,694 | 1,386 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,926 | in this paper we calculate the contributions to the branching ratio of @xmath0 from the charged pseudo - goldstone bosons appeared in one generation technicolor model .
we find that the theoretical values of the branching ratio , @xmath1 , including the contributions of pgbs , @xmath2 and @xmath3 , are much different from the @xmath4 prediction .
the new physics effects can be enhance 2 - 3 levels to @xmath4 result .
it is shown that the decay @xmath5 can give the test the new physics signals from the technicolor model . | as is well known , the rare radiative decays of @xmath6 mesons is in particular sensitive to contributions from those new physics beyond the standard model(sm ) .
both inclusive and exclusive processes , such as the decays @xmath7 , @xmath0 and @xmath8 have been received some attention in the literature@xmath9}$ ] . in this paper
, we will present our results in technicolor theories . the one generation technicolor model ( ogtm)@xmath10}$]is the simplest and most frequently studied model which contained the parameters are less than sm .
same as other models , the ogtm has its defects such as the s parameter large and positive@xmath11}$ ] .
but we can relax the constraints on the ogtm form the @xmath12 parameter by introducing three additional parameters @xmath13@xmath14}$ ] .
the basic idea of the ogtm is : we introduce a new set of asymptotically free gauge interactions and the technicolor force act on technifermions .
the technicolor interaction at @xmath15 become strong and cause a spontaneous breaking of the global flavor symmetry @xmath16 .
the result is @xmath17 massless goldstone bosons .
three of the these objects replace the higgs field and induce a mass of @xmath18 and @xmath19 gauge bosons . and
at the new strong interaction other goldstone bosons acquire masses . as for the @xmath0 , only the charged color single and color octets have contributions .
the gauge couplings of the pgbs are determined by their quantum numbers . in table 1
we listed the relevant couplings@xmath20}$ ] needed in our calculation , where the @xmath21 is the corresponding element of @xmath22 matrix .
the goldstone boson decay constant @xmath23@xmath24}$ ] should be @xmath25 , which corresponds to the vacuum expectation of an elementary higgs field . at the lo in qcd
the effective hamiltonian is @xmath26 where , as usual , @xmath27 denotes the fermi coupling constant and @xmath28 indicates the cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa matrix element.and the current - current , qcd penguin , electromagnetic and chromomagnetic dipole operators are of the form @xmath29 where @xmath30 and @xmath31 are color indices , @xmath32 labels su(3)c generators , e and @xmath33 refer to the electromagnetic and strong coupling constants , while @xmath34 and @xmath35 denote the qed and qcd field strength tensors , respectively . in fig.2 the shot - dash lines represent the charged pgbs @xmath2 and @xmath3 of ogtm .
we at first integrate out the top quark and the weak @xmath36 bosons at @xmath37 scale , generating an effective five - quark theory and run the effective field theory down to b - quark scale to give the leading log qcd corrections by using the renormalization group equation .
the wilson coefficients are process independent and the coefficients @xmath38 of 8 operators are calculated from the fig.2.the wilson coefficients are read@xmath39}$ ] @xmath40 with @xmath41 , @xmath42 and @xmath43.from the @xmath44 , we can see the situation of the color - octet charged pgbs is more complicate than that of the color - singlet charged pgbs , because of the involvement of the color interactions . where @xmath45 \\
b(y ) & = & \frac { -\frac{11}{36 } + \frac{53}{72}y -\frac{25}{72}y^2}{(1-y)^3}\nonumber \\ & + & \frac { -\frac{1}{4}y + \frac{2}{3}y^2 -\frac{1}{3}y^3 } { ( 1-y)^4}\log[y]\\ c(\delta)&=&\frac{\frac{1}{8 } -\frac{5}{8 } \delta-\frac{1}{4 } \delta^2}{(1-\delta)^3 } -\frac { \frac{3}{4}\delta^2}{(1-\delta)^4 } \log[\delta ] \\
d(y ) & = & \frac { -\frac{5}{24 } + \frac{19}{24}y -\frac{5}{6}y^2}{(1-y)^3}\nonumber \\ & + & \frac { \frac{1}{4}y^2 -\frac{1}{2}y^3}{(1-y)^4 } \log[y]\\ e(y ) & = & \frac { \frac{3}{2}-\frac{15}{8}y -\frac{15}{8}y^2 } { ( 1-y)^3 } + \frac{\frac{9}{4}y -\frac{9}{2}y^2}{(1-y)^4 } \log[y]\end{aligned}\ ] ] by caculate the graphs of the exchanged @xmath36 boson in the sm we gained the function @xmath46 and @xmath47;and by caculate the graphs of the exchanged color - singlet and color - octet charged pgbs in ogtm we gained the function @xmath6 , @xmath48 and @xmath49 . when @xmath50 , @xmath51 , the ogtm contribution @xmath6 , @xmath48 and @xmath49 have always a relative minus sign with the sm contribution @xmath46 and @xmath47 . as a result , the ogtm contribution always destructively interferes with the sm contribution . to calculate @xmath0 ,
one may follow a perturbative qcd approach which includes a proof of factorization , showing that soft gluon effects can be factorized into @xmath55 meson wave function ; and a systematic way of resumming large logarithms due to hard gluons with energies between 1gev and @xmath56 . in order to calculate the matrix element of eq(1 ) for the @xmath0
, we can work in the weak binding approximation and assume that both the @xmath57 and the @xmath58 quarks are at rest in the @xmath59 meson , and the @xmath57 quarks carries most of the meson energy , and its four velocity can be treated as equal to that of @xmath59 .
hence one may write @xmath57 quark momentum as @xmath60 where is the common four velocity of @xmath57 and @xmath55 .
we have @xmath61 the total amplitude is now separated into a cp - even and a cp - odd part @xmath66 we find that @xmath67 with @xmath68 , @xmath69 , and @xmath70 where @xmath71\nonumber \\ a_c & = & ( c_1+c_3-c_5)n_c+(c_2+c_4-c_6 ) \nonumber \\ a_s & = & { 1\over 4}\left[(c_3+c_4-c_5)n_c+(c_3+c_4-c_6)\right]\\ a_s & = & { 1\over 4}\left[(c_3+c_4-c_5)n_c+(c_3+c_4-c_6)\right].\end{aligned}\ ] ] the functions @xmath72 , @xmath73 and @xmath74 are defined by @xmath75 with @xmath76 in sm , with @xmath78 , and the other wilson coefficients are zero , we find @xmath79 which amounts to a branching ratio @xmath80 , for the given @xmath81 . in numerical calculations we use the corresponding input parameters @xmath82 , @xmath83 , @xmath84 , @xmath85 and @xmath86 , respectively .
the present experimental limit@xmath87}$ ] on the decay @xmath88 is @xmath89 which is far from the theoretical results .
so , we can not put the constraint to the masses of pgbs .
the constraints of the masses of @xmath2 and @xmath3 can be from the decay@xmath90}$ ] @xmath91 : @xmath92gev .
fig.3(4 ) denotes the @xmath95 about the mass of @xmath93 ( @xmath2 ) under different values of @xmath94 ( @xmath93 ) . from fig.3 and 4
, we find the the curves are much different from the the sm one .
it can be enhanced about 1 - 2 levels to the sm prediction in the reasonable region of the masses of pgbs .
this gives the strong new physics signals from the technicolor model .
the branching ratio of @xmath5 decrease along with the mass of @xmath93 and @xmath2 reduce .
this is from the decoupling theorem that for heavy enough nonstandard boson .
when @xmath96 and @xmath97 have large values , the contributions from ogtm is small.from the @xmath98 , we can see the functions @xmath6 , @xmath48 and @xmath49 go to zero , as @xmath99 , @xmath100.the branching ratio in the fig.(3 ) is changed much faster than that in the fig.(4).this is because the contribution to @xmath88 from the color octet @xmath93 is large when compared with the contribution from color singlet @xmath2 . as a conclusion ,
the size of contribution to the rare decay of @xmath88 from the pgbs strongly depends on the values of the masses of the charged pgbs .
this is quite different from the sm case . by the comparison of the theoretical prediction with the current data one can derived out the the contributions of the pgbs : @xmath2 and @xmath101 to @xmath88 and give the new physics signals of new physics . a n mitra .
lett . , 2000 , * b473 * : 297 - 304 junjie cao , zhenjun xiao , gongru lu .
rev . , 2001 ,
* d64 * : 014012 z.j.xiao , c.d.l , w.j.huo.phys .
, 2003 , * d67 * : 094021 l. reina , g. ricciardi , a. soni .
, 1997 , * d56 * : 5805 g. hiller , e.o .
lett . , 1997 , *
b409 * : 425 c .- h .
chang , g .-
lin , y .- p .
lett . , 1997 ,
* b415 * : 395 - 401 m.r .
ahmady , e. kou .
hep - ph/9708347 g. hiller , e.o .
iltan , mod.phys.lett .
, 1997.*a12 * : 2837 - 2846 s. choudlhury , j. ellis . hep - ph/9804300 t.m .
aliev , g. turan.phys .
, 1993 , * d48 * : 1176 t.m .
aliev , g. hiller , e.o .
nucl.phys.,1998 , * b515 * : 321 - 341 t.m .
aliev , e.o .
, 1998 , * d58 * : 095014 s. bertolini , j. matias .
, 1998 , * d57 * : 4197 - 4204 p. singer , d .- x .
, 1997 , * d56 * : 4274 s. dimopoulos .
nucl.phys.,1980 , * b168 * : 69 e. farhi , l. susskind.phys . rev . , 1979 , * d20 * : 3404 m.e .
peskint . takeuchi .
lett . , 1990 , * 65 * : 964 i. maksymyk , c.p .
, 1994 , * d50 * : 529 z.j.xiao , l.d.wan , j.m.yang , etal . phys .
, 1994 , * d49 * : 5949 e.eichten,i .
hinchliffe , k .
lane , etal .
, 1986 , * d34 * : 1547 c.d .
, 1996 , * d53 * : 2529 j.wicht , i. adachi , h. aihara , etal .
lett . , 2008 , * 100*:121801 | rare radiative decays of @xmath6 mesons sensitive to new physics beyond standard model inclusive exclusive processes decays @xmath7 @xmath0 @xmath8 attention literature present results in technicolor theories one generation technicolor model simplest frequently studied model parameters less than sm defects s parameter large positive relax constraints introducing three additional parameters introduce new free gauge interactions technicolor force act on technifermions technicolor interaction at @xmath15 strong breaking global flavor symmetry result is @xmath17 massless goldstone bosons three objects replace higgs field induce mass of @xmath18 @xmath19 gauge bosons strong interaction other goldstone bosons acquire masses @xmath0 charged color single octets have contributions gauge couplings of pgbs determined by quantum numbers table 1 relevant couplings calculation @xmath21 corresponding element of @xmath22 matrix goldstone boson decay constant @xmath23 should be @xmath25 corresponds to vacuum expectation of elementary higgs fieldqcd hamiltonian @xmath26 @xmath27 fermi coupling constant cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa matrix element current - qcd penguin electromagnetic chromomagnetic dipole operators @xmath29 color indices su(3)c generators electromagnetic strong coupling constants qed qcd field strength tensors.2 shot - dash lines charged pgbs @xmath2 @xmath3 ogtm integrate top quark weak @xmath36 bosons @xmath37 scale effective five - quark theory field theory b - quark scale leading log qcd corrections renormalization group equation wilson coefficients process independent @xmath38 8 operators calculated fig wilson coefficients@xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath43 @xmath44 color - octet charged pgbs complicate color - singlet charged pgbs color interactions@xmath45 \frac{11}{36 } \frac{53}{72}y -{25}{72}y^2-y)^3} \frac{1}{4}y {2}{3}y^2 -{1}{3}y^3 1-y)^4}{1}{8 } -{5}{8 }-\frac{1}{4 } \delta^2}{(1-\delta)^3 } -{3}{4}\delta^2}-\delta)^4 \frac -{5}{24 } \frac{19}{24}y -\frac{5}{6}y^2}-y)^3} \frac{1}{4}y^2 -{1}{2}y^3}{(1-y)^4 } \frac{3}{2}-{15}{8}y -{15}{8}y^2 1-y)^3 }{9}{4}y -\frac{9}{2}y^2}{(1-y)^4 } graphs @xmath36 gained function @xmath46 @xmath47 function @xmath6 @xmath48 @xmath49@xmath50 ogtm contribution @xmath6 minus sign with sm contribution @xmath46 ogtm contribution interferes sm contribution calculate @xmath0 perturbative qcd approach proof of factorization soft gluon effects @xmath55 meson wave function resumming large logarithms hard gluons energies between 1gev @xmath56 calculate matrix element eq(1 ) @xmath0 weak binding approximation @xmath57 @xmath58 quarks rest in @xmath59 meson carries meson energy four velocity equal @xmath59 write @xmath57 quark momentum as @xmath60 common four velocity of @xmath57 @xmath55 @xmath61 total amplitude separated into cp - even cp - odd part @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath70 @xmath71\nonumber a_c c_1+c_3-c_5)n_c+(c_2+c_4-c_6 1\over 4}(c_3+c_4-c_5)n+(c_3+c_4-c_6) 4_3+c_4-c_3+c_4-c_6){aligned functions @xmath72 defined by @xmath75 @xmath76 sm @xmath78 wilson coefficients zero find @xmath79 branching ratio @xmath80 for @xmath81 numerical calculations use input parameters @xmath82 experimental limit@xmath87 on decay @xmath88 is @xmath89 far from theoretical results constraint to masses pgbs constraints of masses @xmath2 @xmath3 from decay@xmath90 @xmath91 : @xmath92gev fig.3(4 ) @xmath95 mass of @xmath93 under different values @xmath94 curves different from sm one enhanced 1 - 2 levels to sm prediction in reasonable region masses pgbs strong physics signals from technicolor model branching ratio of @xmath5 decrease mass of @xmath93 @xmath2 reduce decoupling theorem heavy nonstandard boson @xmath96 @xmath97 large values contributions from ogtm small functions @xmath6 go to zero @xmath99 @xmath100 branching ratio in fig.(3 ) changed faster than fig.(4)contribution @xmath88 @xmath93 large compared with @xmath2 rare decay @xmath88 depends on masses charged pgbs different from sm case comparison theoretical prediction current data contributions @xmath2 @xmath101 to @xmath88 new mitra 2000 b473 297 - 304 junjie cao zhenjun xiao gongru lu 2001 d64 : 014012 z.j.xiao .d.l.huo.phys 2003 d67 094021 l. reina . ricciardi . soni 1997 d56 5805 g. hiller lett 1997 b409 : 425 c h chang lin lett 1997 b415 395 - 401 m ahmady e kou hep ph/9708347 g. hiller iltan mod.phys.lett 1997. 2837 - 2846 s. choudlhury j. ellis ph/9804300 t aliev turan.phys 1993 d48 1176 t.m aliev g. hiller nucl.phys. b515 : 321 - 341 t.m .aliev e.o 1998 d58 095014 s matias 1998 d57 4197 - 4204 p. singer 1997 d56 4274 s. dimopoulos nucl.phys. b168 69 e. farhi susskind.phys rev 1979 d20 3404 m.e peskint takeuchi lett 1990 65 964 i. maksymyk 1994 d50 529 z.j.xiao l.d.wan j.m.yang 1994 d49 5949 e.eichten hinchliffe lane etal 1986 d34 1547 c.d . 1996 d53 2529 j.wicht adachi aihara lett 2008 100*:121801 | 0.434258 | 2,796 | 1,521 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,928 | causal dynamical triangulations is a background independent approach to quantum gravity .
we show that there exists an effective transfer matrix labeled by the scale factor which properly describes the evolution of the quantum universe . in this framework
no degrees of freedom are frozen , but , the obtained effective action agrees with the minisuperspace model .
+ _ andrzej grlich _ + the niels bohr institute , copenhagen university + blegdamsvej 17 , dk-2100 copenhagen , denmark . +
email : goerlich@nbi.dk | in causal dynamical triangulations ( cdt ) the quantum gravity path integral is regularized by approximating the spacetime geometry @xmath0 with a piecewise linear manifold @xmath1 @xcite .
the building blocks of four dimensional cdt are four - simplices , which form a simplicial manifold .
imposed global proper - time foliation allows a well - defined wick rotation .
spatial slices , enumerated by a discrete time coordinate @xmath2 , are built of equilateral tetrehedra with link length @xmath3 .
time - like links have length @xmath4 .
there are two kinds of simplices : @xmath5 and @xmath6 where the numbers denote the number of vertices in adjacent slices . the regularized partition function @xmath7 is written as a sum over causal triangulations @xmath1 , @xmath8 e^{i s^{eh}[g ] } \,\rightarrow \ , \sum_{{\mathcal{t } } } e^{- s[{\mathcal{t } } ] } , \ s[{\mathcal{t } } ] = - k_0\ n_0 + k_4\ n_4 + \delta\ ( n_{41 } - 6 n_0 ) , \ ] ] where @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 are bare coupling constants , which are functions of @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
the discrete regge action @xmath14 $ ] is the einstein - hilbert action @xmath15 = \frac{1}{16 \pi g } \int { \mathrm{d}}t \int { \mathrm{d}}^3 x \sqrt{- g } ( r - 2 \lambda)$ ] evaluated on a simplicial manifold @xmath1 composed of @xmath16 vertices and @xmath17 simplices , among them @xmath18 of type @xmath5 , using monte carlo simulations , we can measure expectation values of observables within the cdt framework .
the simplest observable is the three - volume @xmath19 defined as the number of tetrahedra building slice @xmath2 . in the de sitter phase the average volume profile @xmath20 corresponds to a four - dimensional euclidean de sitter universe which emerges dynamically as a background geometry .
studies of the covariance matrix @xmath21 showed that the fluctuations of @xmath19 are well described by the discretized minisuperspace action@xcite , @xmath22 = \frac{1}{\gamma } \sum_t \left ( \frac{(n_{t+1 } - n_t)^2}{n_{t+1 } + n_t } + \mu n_t^{1/3 } - \lambda n_t \right ) .
\label{eq : sminid}\ ] ]
the cdt model is completely determined by a transfer matrix @xmath23 , @xmath24 } } = { \mathrm{tr}}{\mathcal{m}}^t , \quad \langle \tau_1 | { \mathcal{m}}| \tau_2 \rangle = \sum_{{\mathcal{t}}|_{\tau_1 , \tau_2 } } e^{-s[{\mathcal{t } } ] } .
\label{eq : z2}\ ] ] the matrix element @xmath25 denotes the transition amplitude between states corresponding to three - dimensional triangulations @xmath26 and @xmath27 in one time step .
it is given by the sum over all four - dimensional triangulations @xmath1 of a slab with boundaries @xmath26 and @xmath27 .
it depends both on the entropy factor and the action @xmath14 $ ] .
the probability of finding a configuration with spatial volumes @xmath28 , @xmath29 , \label{eq : ptncm}\ ] ] can be measured in monte carlo simulations . here
@xmath30 is a projection operator on the subspace spanned by subset @xmath31 of three - dimensional triangulations which are build of exactly @xmath32 three - simplices .
although it is misleading to think of the aggregated `` state '' @xmath33 as a normalized sum of vectors @xmath34 , the form of the effective action ( [ eq : sminid ] ) suggests that there exists an effective transfer matrix @xmath35 whose elements are labeled by the three - volumes . for simplicity ,
let us define the two - point function , @xmath36 by summing over all three - volumes except at the times @xmath2 and @xmath37 .
we will show that equation ( [ eq : ptwopoint ] ) provides a very good approximation to the measured data @xcite .
the effective transfer matrix elements can be measured in various ways , for example @xmath38 or @xmath39 .
the elements @xmath35 measured in different ways completely agree up to numerical noise , supporting equation ( [ eq : ptwopoint ] ) .
all measurements presented in this paper were performed using the second expression for coupling constants @xmath40 , @xmath41 and @xmath42 .
the minisuperspace effective action ( [ eq : sminid ] ) is directly related to the effective transfer matrix @xmath43 and suggests that @xmath44 } .
\label{eq : tmeff}\ ] ] empirical transfer matrix elements @xmath35 showed that for large @xmath19 , up to numerical noise , approximation ( [ eq : tmeff ] ) is very accurate and allows extraction of parameters @xmath45 , @xmath46 and @xmath47 . as a function of @xmath48 , and a linear fit @xmath49 ( red line ) .
right : the potential term .
measured @xmath50 and the fit of the potential term @xmath51 ( red line , stops at @xmath52 ) .
, title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] as a function of @xmath48 , and a linear fit @xmath49 ( red line ) .
right : the potential term .
measured @xmath50 and the fit of the potential term @xmath51 ( red line , stops at @xmath52 ) .
, title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] we can get a better estimation of the kinetic term by keeping the sum of the entries @xmath48 fixed .
the matrix elements show the gaussian dependence on @xmath32 , @xmath53 $ ] .
the denominator @xmath54 of the kinetic term can be measured .
linear behaviour @xmath49 is shown in fig .
[ fig : kinpot ] ( left ) .
the potential part of the effective lagrangian @xmath55 may be extracted from the diagonal elements of the transfer matrix , @xmath56 .
right part of fig .
[ fig : kinpot ] presents the measured effective lagrangian and the fit . in the bulk region ,
where @xmath19 is large enough , the theoretical expectation ( [ eq : tmeff ] ) fits very well .
the best fit gives @xmath57 , @xmath58 and @xmath59 .
the model of causal dynamical triangulations comes with a transfer matrix @xmath25 .
the measured distributions of three - volumes @xmath19 , e.g. @xmath60 , have an exact definition in terms of the full transfer matrix @xmath23 and the density matrix @xmath61 .
the data coming from monte carlo simulations seems to allow for a much simpler description in terms of an effective transfer matrix @xmath43 , labeled by abstract vectors @xmath33 referring only to the three - volume .
the effective transfer matrix @xmath43 allows to directly measure the effective action @xmath62 $ ] .
the new method makes measurements faster . over the whole range of @xmath19
the effective transfer matrix elements are given by ( [ eq : tmeff ] ) with high accuracy .
this result is fully consistent with the reduced minisuperspace action ( [ eq : sminid ] ) , although in cdt no degrees of freedom are frozen . | causal dynamical triangulations quantum gravity path integral regularized approximating spacetime geometry @xmath0 piecewise linear manifold @xmath1 building blocks four dimensional cdt four - simplices form simplicial manifold global proper - time foliation allows wick rotation spatial slices enumerated time coordinate @xmath2 built equilateral tetrehedra link length @xmath3 time - links length @xmath4 two simplices @xmath5 @xmath6 numbers denote vertices adjacent slices regularized partition function @xmath7 sum over causal triangulations @xmath1 @xmath8 = - k_0 n + k_4 +\delta - @xmath9 @xmath11 coupling constants functions of @xmath12 @xmath13discrete regge action @xmath14 einstein - hilbert action @xmath15 = \frac{1{16 g\mathrm{d}}t^3{ g r - 2 \lambda simplicial manifold @xmath1 @xmath16 vertices @xmath17 simplices @xmath18 @xmath5 monte carlo simulations measure expectation values observables cdt framework simplest observable three - volume @xmath19 tetrahedra building slice @xmath2 de sitter phase average volume profile @xmath20 four - euclidean de sitter universe background geometry covariance matrix @xmath21 fluctuations @xmath19 described discretized minisuperspace action @xmath22 = \frac{1}\gamma \sum_t{(n_{t+1 -^2}{n_{t+1 + n_t n_t{1/3 -\lambda n_t cdt model determined transfer matrix @xmath23 @xmath24 \mathrm{tr}}\mathcal{m}}^t\tau_1_2\mathcal{t}}{t: z2 matrix element @xmath25 transition amplitude between three - dimensional triangulations given by sum four - dimensional triangulations @xmath1 slab with depends on entropy action @xmath14 probability of configuration with spatial volumes @xmath28 ptncm measured in monte carlo simulations @xmath30 projection operator on subspace @xmath31 of three - dimensional triangulations @xmath32 three - simplices misleading aggregated state @xmath33 normalized sum of vectors @xmath34 effective action eq : sminid suggests effective transfer matrix @xmath35 elements labeled by three - volumes define two - point function @xmath36 by summing all three - volumes except @xmath2 equation ( [ eq : ptwopoint ] approximation to measured data effective transfer matrix elements measured various ways elements @xmath35 measured agree numerical noise equation eq : ptwopoint measurements using second expression for coupling constants @xmath40 minisuperspace effective action eq : sminid related to effective transfer matrix @xmath43 suggests @xmath44{eq : tmeff empirical transfer matrix elements @xmath35 showed large @xmath19 numerical noise approximation eq tmeff accurate allows extraction of parameters @xmath45 @xmath47 function of @xmath48 linear fit @xmath49 potential term measured @xmath50 fit @xmath51 stops @xmath52 function @xmath48 linear fit @xmath49 potential term measured @xmath50 fit @xmath51 @xmath52 better estimation kinetic term keeping sum entries @xmath48 fixed matrix elements show gaussian dependence on @xmath32 @xmath53 denominator @xmath54 kinetic term measured linear behaviour @xmath49 shown in fig . potential part effective lagrangian @xmath55 extracted from diagonal elements transfer matrix @xmath56 measured effective lagrangian fit bulk region @xmath19 large theoretical expectation ( eq : tmeff fits well best fit gives @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 model of causal dynamical triangulations transfer matrix @xmath25 measured distributions of three - volumes @xmath19@xmath60 definition full transfer matrix @xmath23 density matrix @xmath61 data monte carlo simulations simpler description effective transfer matrix @xmath43 abstract vectors @xmath33 three - volume effective transfer matrix @xmath43 effective action @xmath62 new method measurements faster @xmath19 effective transfer matrix elements eq : tmeff ] high accuracy consistent reduced minisuperspace action eq : sminid ] no freedom frozen | 0.307483 | 1,763 | 915 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,936 | we present data testing the existence of a parity - flavor breaking phase in simulations of qcd with two flavors of light wilson fermions .
this is done by explicit simulations on lattice sizes of @xmath0 , @xmath1 and @xmath2 for a variety of values of @xmath3 and @xmath4 as well as the coefficient , @xmath5 , of an explicit breaking term included in the action .
we find that at @xmath6 equal to or greater than 5.0 extrapolation in the parameter @xmath5 as well as in the lattice volume show no indication of a phase where parity and flavor are spontaneously broken in the limit of zero @xmath5 .
makecaption#1#2 10@ tempboxa tempboxa > _ _ _ _ _ _ # 1 : # 2 _ _ _ _ _ _ tempboxa = -.5truein = -.75truein = 100000 = 10000 | for many years now , aoki @xcite and collaborators @xcite have been advocating the existence of a parity - flavor breaking phase in qcd with wilson fermions as a means of explaining why the pion mass in this model approaches small values as the wilson parameter @xmath4 approaches , for every value of inverse square coupling @xmath3 , a critical value @xmath7 .
this in spite of no - go theorems @xcite that forbid such a phase in the continuum limit .
indeed analytic arguments have been presented to support the existence of such a phase at @xmath8 . for
finite and , in particular , larger values of @xmath3 where current lattice simulations are undertaken , such evidence is lacking @xcite .
although the picture advocated by aoki may explain the smallness of the pion masses as @xmath4 approaches @xmath7 it also explicitly states that these pions are not the goldstone modes of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking .
this presents a problem in that it is not then clear that any of the soft pion and other theorems associated with this phenomenon will be respected on the lattice . in other words
this would not be the expected simulation of true qcd .
in fact the large @xmath9 analytic analysis which indicates the existence of this phase at @xmath8 also shows the non - vanishing of the @xmath10 scattering length which is contrary to the the expected spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking of qcd .
this is of course unimportant at @xmath8 but is very important , if true , at the values of @xmath11 where current simulations are performed .
the alternative picture where the explicit chiral symmetry breaking wilson term causes the ( otherwise goldstone ) pions to acquire a small mass proportional to the lattice spacing does not have such a problem . indeed , that all these extra effects would disappear as the lattice spacing is made smaller with the approach to the continuum limit was formally demonstrated some time ago @xcite .
several models exhibit a parity - flavor breaking phase . in the nambu - johna - lassinio @xcite model with wilson fermions
this phase was numerically and , in the large @xmath9 approximation , analytically @xcite confirmed for values of @xmath3 up to a specific cutoff value .
this phase disappears for larger values of @xmath3 .
the schwinger model with two flavors of wilson fermions exhibits this phase at strong coupling and also loses it at weak coupling @xcite .
whereas the picture advocated by aoki does not anticipate such a quenching effect for the phase in qcd , recent phenomenological arguments by creutz @xcite tend to show a preference for quenching of this phase if it exists .
thus it becomes necessary to explore this important feature by explicit simulations of qcd with wilson fermions on volumes larger than those already studied @xcite .
following arguments presented by aoki and aoki and gocksch @xcite , it is necessary , in order to investigate the presence of the parity - flavor - breaking phase in simulations , to introduce first an explicit breaking term into the action and then extrapolate the measured order parameter as this term tends to zero . since the extrapolation is to be done , in principle , after the ` infinite volume ' limit
is taken , such simulations must be done for larger volumes and any order parameter extrapolation be studied as a function of this increasing volume . in such a situation a typical behaviour of the data at finite volumes that one might expect
is shown in fig .
it is expected that the functional dependence of the ( measured ) order parameter on @xmath5 be such that for any @xmath12 volume this order parameter vanishes at @xmath13 .
the variation of this dependence with increasing volume is crucial to the initial determination of the existence of a broken phase or its absence .
the existence of a broken phase in the infinite volume limit is signaled by a flattening of this dependence for larger values of @xmath5 and a sharper drop to zero as @xmath5 approaches zero .
thus it is clear that a significant volume dependence of the order parameter at smaller values of @xmath5 is a necessary indicative factor for this phase . if , on the other hand , the approach to zero is not varying significantly as the volume increases , the infinite volume limit will not sustain a broken phase .
one may use the slightly varying values of the order parameter there to extrapolate these to @xmath14 @xmath15 . if this step is then followed by a linear extrapolation to @xmath16 a non - zero value for the order parameter at @xmath16 may be obtained . at this stage
it is tempting to conclude that a broken phase exists in that limit
. this may be the wrong conclusion if this is not accompanied by a significant increase in the value of the order parameter at smaller values of @xmath5 . ]
we report here on simulations done with two flavors of wilson fermions at @xmath17 , and @xmath18 on volumes of @xmath19 , and @xmath2 for a variety of values of @xmath4 ranging from less than the appropriate @xmath7 to values greater than @xmath7 .
the choice of these three values of @xmath3 was determined as follows .
the value @xmath20 represents current simulations on larger lattices where spectrum and matrix element calculations are being done ; that at @xmath21 represents a lower value below which relevance to continuum physics is not expected , and the last value at @xmath22 is to extend the search to a much larger value of @xmath3 in case the parity - flavor breaking phase were to be confirmed at the two smaller values .
we introduce into the qcd action a term of the form @xmath23 where @xmath24 is a @xmath25 matrix representing the third element of the generators of flavor su(2 ) algebra . upon integrating the fermionic variables
this is reflected in the simulation by the product of two determinants : @xmath26 where @xmath27 is given by a simple modification of the wilson matrix @xmath28 as : @xmath29 as pointed out by aoki , we also have here @xmath30 and : @xmath31 simulations were done for the parameter @xmath5 taking values ranging from 0.001 to 0.3 . for the volume dependence we concentrate on the smaller values of @xmath5 and in particular @xmath32 and @xmath33 for all three volumes considered and mostly for values of @xmath4 greater than @xmath7 .
the order parameter we compute is the expectation value of the operator @xmath34 . with our notation
this is given as @xmath35
for the three values of @xmath3 considered , simulations were performed , as mentioned above , at various values of @xmath4 both below and above @xmath7 .
we shall present the data and results for each value of @xmath3 considered separately . in all cases these simulations
were also done at various values of the external parameter @xmath5 . for each @xmath4 the results of the compuations on the three volumes @xmath36 , @xmath37 , and @xmath38 were compared at the two values of @xmath39 , and @xmath40 .
the variation of the order parameter with @xmath41 is then used to obtain an ` infinite volume ' limit for all values of @xmath5 used .
the choice of @xmath41 is indicated here by the naive dimension of the order parameter . following this
, the order parameter at these values of @xmath5 were fitted to : @xmath42 a separate fit to the pure quadratic polynomial @xmath43 was also done . the initial aim in this case is to detect the possible existence of any non - zero constant @xmath44 at @xmath16 as the limit of the order parameter at that point .
this is of particular interest for comparing results at values of @xmath4 above @xmath7 with those below @xmath7 .
it is useful to point out here that in the presence of a parity - flavor breaking phase the order parameter is expected to vary with @xmath5 as : @xmath45 this being the behaviour of the root of the cubic equation determining the position of the minimum of the quartic effective potential . in the absence of such a phase the same behaviour follows with @xmath46 .
as the quartic potential becomes quadratic the leading behaviour becomes : @xmath47 this should , when compared to the data , be also a useful tool in determining which situation one is in .
the value of @xmath7 at this value of @xmath3 is known to be about @xmath48 .
we consequently performed simulations well below that value at @xmath49 and well above it at @xmath50 and intermediate values in between .
we present in table [ table - one ] the results of these simulations .
.parameters and measured order parameter @xmath51 for the case of @xmath21 on lattices of volume @xmath36 , for @xmath52 , @xmath53 , and @xmath38 . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ table - three ] we show in fig . [ fig8 ] the variation of the computed order parameter with @xmath4 over the range used . no sharp change is indicated as the value of @xmath54 is crossed .
we concentrate here on the data at the values of @xmath55 above @xmath7 . using the same procedure as above
essentially the same conclusion follows .
[ fig9]a and b show that no significant change in the evaluation of the order parameter at the larger volumes exists for @xmath56 at @xmath40 and as seen by the overlapping histograms for @xmath57 at @xmath40 .
furthermore , quadratic fits in @xmath5 at , for example , @xmath58 and @xmath59 again have a leading ` constant ' that is consistent with zero as shown in figs .
[ fig10]a and b , respectively .
therefore , one is led again to the absence of any signal for a parity - flavor breaking phase at this value of @xmath3 .
finally the obvious leading linear dependence of the fit indicates again a dominant quadratic effective potential at this value of @xmath3 as well .
it is clear from the discussion above that qcd with two flavors of wilson fermions does not exhibit a parity - flavor breaking phase at @xmath60 as postulated by aoki and collaborators . since it has been demonstrated that at @xmath8 such a phase may exist in a large @xmath9 ( color ) limit , it is also clear that if this phase does extend beyound @xmath8 , it must pinch out in a manner similar to that in the njl model at @xmath61 . in either case
this phase would not be relevant for the discussion of the approach to the chiral limit in qcd and the ensuing goldstone nature of the pions for @xmath62 .
in fact , all indications are such that , as shown formally sometime ago , this is simply related to the approach to zero lattice spacing and infinite volume .
i wish to thank urs heller for providing a modified qcd code for performing the simulations reported in this paper .
all these simulations were done on the scri ibm compute cluster .
this research was supported by the u.s .
department of energy through contract nos .
de - fg05 - 92er40742 and de - fc05 - 85er250000 .
9 s. aoki , phys .
d30 , 2653 ( 1984 ) s. aoki , phys .
d33 , 2339 ( 1984 ) s. aoki , phys .
letters 57 , 3136 ( 1986 ) s. aoki , nucl .
b314 , 79 , ( 1989 ) s. aoki , on the phase structure of qcd with wilson fermions , uthep-318 , august ( 1995 ) s. aoki and a. gocksch .
letters b231 , 449 ( 1989 ) s. aoki and a. gocksch .
letters b243 , 409 ( 1990 ) s. aoki and a. gocksch .
d45 , 3845 ( 1992 ) c. vafa and e. witten , nuclear physics b234 , 173 ( 1984 ) c. vafa and e. witten , phys .
letters 53 , 535 ( 1984 ) l.h .
karsten and j. smit , nucl .
b183 , 103 ( 1981 ) e. seiler and i. stamatescu , phys .
d25 , 2177 ( 1982 ) m. bochicchio , l. maiani , g. martinelli , g. rossi and m. testa , nuclear physics b262 , 331 ( 1985 ) k. m. bitar and p. vranas , phys .
rev d50 , 3406 ( 1994 ) k. m. bitar and p. vranas , nuclear physic b , proc .
34 , 661 ( 1994 ) s. aoki , s. boettcher and a. gocksch , phys .
letters b331 , 157 ( 1994 ) i. horvath , the phase structure of the schwinger model on the lattice with wilson fermions in the hartree - fock approximation , fsu - scri-95 - 101 ; to appear in phys .
d ( 1996 ) , m. creutz , bnl-62123 , may 1995 p. lepage and p.g .
mackenzie , phys .
d48 , 2250 ( 1993 ) | years aoki collaborators parity - flavor breaking phase in qcd with wilson fermions explaining pion mass approaches small values wilson parameter @xmath4 approaches inverse square coupling @xmath3 critical value @xmath7 no - go theorems phase in continuum limit analytic arguments support phase at @xmath8 for finite larger values of @xmath3 lattice simulations evidence lacking picture aoki explain smallness pion masses as @xmath4 approaches @xmath7 states pions not goldstone modes of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking problem clear soft pion other theorems respected on lattice not expected simulation of true qcd large @xmath9 analytic analysis indicates phase at @xmath8 shows non - vanishing of @xmath10 scattering length contrary to expected spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking qcd unimportant at @xmath8 important at values @xmath11 simulations alternative picture explicit chiral symmetry breaking term causes pions small mass proportional to lattice spacing problem extra effects disappear as lattice spacing smaller with approach continuum limit demonstrated several models exhibit parity - flavor breaking phasenambu - johna - lassinio @xcite model with wilson fermions phase confirmed for values @xmath3 up to cutoff value disappears for larger values @xmath3 schwinger model with two flavors wilson fermions exhibits phase at strong coupling loses at weak coupling picture aoki anticipate quenching effect phase in qcd arguments by creutz @xcite preference for quenching phase necessary to explore feature by simulations qcd with wilson fermions on volumes larger arguments aoki gocksch investigate parity - flavor - breaking phase simulations introduce explicit breaking term extrapolate measured order parameter as tends to zero extrapolation after infinite volume limit simulations for larger volumes order parameter extrapolation function increasing volume typical behaviour data at finite volumes shown in fig . functional dependence of order parameter on @xmath5 @xmath12 volume vanishes at @xmath13 variation dependence with increasing volume crucial broken phase existence broken phase in infinite volume limit signaled by flattening dependence for larger values @xmath5 drop to zero as @xmath5 approaches zerosignificant volume dependence order parameter at smaller values @xmath5 necessary for phase if approach to zero not varying volume increases infinite volume limit sustain broken phase use varying values to extrapolate to @xmath14 followed by linear extrapolation to @xmath16 non - zero value at obtained tempting conclude broken phase exists in limit wrong if significant increase value order parameter at smaller values @xmath5 report on simulations with two flavors wilson fermions at @xmath17 @xmath18 volumes @xmath19 @xmath2 for values @xmath4 less than to greater choice of three values @xmath3 determined value @xmath20 represents current simulations on larger lattices @xmath21 lower value continuum physics not last value @xmath22 search to larger value @xmath3 parity - flavor breaking phase confirmed at smaller values introduce qcd action term form @xmath23 @xmath24 is @xmath25 matrix third element of generators of flavor su(2 ) algebraintegrating fermionic variables reflected in simulation two determinants @xmath26 @xmath27 modification wilson matrix @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 simulations for @xmath5 values 0.001 to 0.3 volume dependence concentrate on smaller values @xmath5 for three volumes values @xmath4 greater than @xmath7 order parameter is expectation value operator @xmath34 given as @xmath35 for three values @xmath3 simulations performed at various values @xmath4 below above @xmath7 present data results for each value @xmath3 separately simulations done at various values external parameter @xmath5 each @xmath4 results compuations volumes @xmath36 compared at @xmath39 @xmath40 variation order parameter with @xmath41 infinite volume limit for all values @xmath5 choice of @xmath41 indicated by naive dimension order parameter order parameter values @xmath5 fitted to @xmath42 separate fit to quadratic polynomial @xmath43 initial aim detect non - zero constant @xmath44 at @xmath16 limit order parameter comparing results at values @xmath4 above @xmath7 belowuseful point out parity - flavor breaking phase order parameter vary with @xmath5 @xmath45 behaviour root cubic equation position quartic effective potential absence phase same behaviour follows with @xmath46 quartic potential becomes quadratic leading behaviour becomes @xmath47 useful tool determining situation value of @xmath7 at @xmath3 about @xmath48 performed simulations below value at @xmath49 above @xmath50 intermediate values in between present in table results simulations.parameters measured order parameter @xmath51 for @xmath21 on lattices volume @xmath36 @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath38 fig variation of computed order parameter with @xmath4 over range no sharp change value @xmath54 crossed concentrate on data at values @xmath55 above @xmath7 same procedure same conclusion follows no significant change in evaluation order parameter at larger volumes for @xmath56 at @xmath40 overlapping histograms @xmath57 at @xmath40 quadratic fits in @xmath5 at @xmath58 and @xmath59 have leading constant consistent with zero in figs and babsence signal for parity - flavor breaking phase at @xmath3 leading linear dependence of fit indicates dominant quadratic effective potential at @xmath3 qcd with two flavors of wilson fermions parity - flavor breaking phase at @xmath60 as postulated by aoki collaborators demonstrated at @xmath8 phase in @xmath9 color limit if phase @xmath8 must pinch out similar to njl model at @xmath61 phase not relevant for approach to chiral limit in qcd goldstone nature of pions for @xmath62 related to approach zero lattice spacing infinite volume urs heller for modified qcd code simulations simulations on scri ibm compute cluster supported by u.s . department of energy through contract nos de - fg05 - 92er40742 and de - fc05 - 85er250000 aoki phys d30 , 2653 1984 d33 2339 1984 57 3136 ( 1986 b314 , 79 1989 phase structure of qcd with wilson fermions uthep-318 , august 1995 gocksch letters b231 , 449 ( 1989b243 409 1990 aoki gocksch d45 3845 1992 vafa witten nuclear b234 173 1984 vafa witten 53 535 1984 karsten j smit b183 , 103 1981 ) seiler stamatescu d25, 2177 1982 ) bochicchio maiani martinelli rossi testa nuclear b262, 331 1985 ) bitar vranas d50 , 3406 1994 bitar vranas nuclear 34 , 661 1994 ) aoki boettcher gocksch b331 , 157 1994 ) horvath phase structure schwinger model wilson fermions hartree - fock approximation fsu scri-95 - 101 phys 1996 creutz bnl-62123 1995 lepage mackenzie phys d48 , 2250 1993 | 0.437849 | 2,986 | 1,551 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,942 | we have searched for the di - pion transition @xmath0(2p)@xmath1(1p ) in the cleo iii sample of @xmath2 decays in the exclusive decay chain : @xmath3(2p ) , @xmath0(2p)@xmath1(1p ) , @xmath0(1p)@xmath4(1s ) , @xmath5 .
our studies include both @xmath6 and @xmath7 , each analyzed both in fully reconstructed events and in events with one pion undetected .
we show that the null hypothesis is not substantiated . under reasonable assumptions ,
we find the partial decay width to be @xmath8(2p)@xmath1(1p)@xmath9 with the uncertainties being statistical , internal cleo systematics , and common systematics from outside sources . | heavy quarkonia , either @xmath10 or @xmath11 , have provided good laboratories for the study of the strong interaction .
new , large data samples at cleo / cesr and bes / bepc have renewed the interest in heavy quarkonia@xcite .
although copiously produced in electric dipole ( e1 ) transitions from the @xmath2 and @xmath12 , the @xmath13 ( @xmath14 ) and @xmath0 ( @xmath15 ) are largely unexplored .
the dominant hadronic transitions among the heavy quarkonia involve di - pion emission , characterized by yan@xcite as the emission of two soft gluons which then hadronize as a di - pion system .
these have been studied for transitions among the quarkonia @xmath16 states , but have not been observed in other quarkonia transitions such as @xmath17 or the @xmath13 decays , which are the subject of this work .
new interest in @xmath13 decays has also been generated by the cleo observation@xcite of a large branching fraction for the decay @xmath18 .
this is the only presently known hadronic decay of the @xmath19-wave @xmath20 states and the only hadronic bottomonium transition that is not through @xmath21 .
we have investigated another hadronic transition of the @xmath13 , namely @xmath22 . as shown in fig .
[ fig : signal_and_ts ] , this search starts with the e1 transition @xmath23 , followed by the signal process @xmath22 , and the resulting @xmath0 decay ( again via an e1 transition ) as @xmath24 with @xmath5 .
thus the final state has two photons , two low - momentum ( `` soft '' ) pions and two high - momentum leptons . in this article
we ( i ) establish this @xmath13 decay and , with reasonable assumptions , ( ii ) estimate the partial width @xmath25(2p)@xmath1(1p)@xmath26 . the main background to our signal , also shown in fig . [ fig : signal_and_ts ] , has @xmath27 , followed by an e1 cascade through the @xmath0 states to the @xmath28 .
this background process , which we will denote as `` @xmath29 '' , has the same number of pions , leptons and photons , with similar kinematics .
while this means we need stringent selection criteria to define the signal , it also provides a known process with a nearly identical final state against which to test our analysis procedures .
the data were collected at the cornell electron storage ring using the cleo iii@xcite detector configuration .
the components most critical for this analysis were the cs - i electromagnetic calorimeter and the charged particle tracking system , each covering @xmath3093% of the @xmath31 solid angle .
consisting of 7800 crystals , the calorimeter was originally installed in the cleo ii configuration@xcite , with some reshaping and restacking for cleo iii to allow more complete solid angle coverage .
the shower energy resolution , @xmath32 , is 4% at 100 mev and 2% at 1 gev in the barrel region , defined as @xmath33 , with @xmath34 the dip angle with respect to the beam axis .
complemented at small radius by a 4-layer double - sided silicon vertex detector , a new drift chamber@xcite was installed for cleo iii ; its endplate design minimizes material , enhancing the resolution of the endcap electromagnetic calorimeter , extending the solid angle coverage to @xmath35 .
the signal was searched for in 1.39 fb@xmath36 of data accumulated at the center of mass energy corresponding to the @xmath2 resonance , consisting of @xmath37 resonance decays@xcite .
we also used 8.6 fb@xmath36 of data taken at @xmath38 gev ( `` high - energy continuum '' ) and 0.78 fb@xmath36 of data taken at the @xmath12 , or roughly @xmath39 decays@xcite , to study and evaluate backgrounds .
we used large monte carlo simulations based on geant3.211/11@xcite to estimate our efficiencies and tune our selection criteria .
in addition to the signal process , we simulated : ( i ) the main background process , `` @xmath29 '' , as described above and in fig .
[ fig : signal_and_ts ] ; ( ii ) @xmath27 with @xmath40 , a process with higher statistics and similar pion kinematics , to help confirm our efficiency determinations ; ( iii ) @xmath27 with @xmath41 , which could mimic our signal multiplicity if two photons were missed ; ( iv ) `` generic '' @xmath2 monte carlo , which uses all known properties and modes of @xmath2 decay , but for which the backgrounds ( i ) through ( iii ) are tagged and not analyzed ; ( v ) @xmath42 continuum processes at the @xmath2 center of mass energy ; ( vii ) for the charged pion decay channel , @xmath43 with @xmath18 and @xmath44 , which has the same initial photon transition as our signal but would have an additional photon in the decay of the @xmath45 resulting from the @xmath46 decay to @xmath47 ; and ( viii ) for the neutral pion decay channel , @xmath48 with @xmath49 ; we used @xmath50 , which is the present 90% cl upper limit for this decay . in our studies we assumed that there were no @xmath51-wave contributions to the decays , only @xmath52-wave , so that @xmath53 .
this assumption is supported by : ( a ) the maximum available energy , @xmath54 , for the nine possible decays is @xmath55 = 130 mev , making it difficult to have the extra kinetic energy associated with two units of angular momentum ; ( b ) previous studies of @xmath2@xmath56@xcite and @xmath57@xcite , systems with substantially more @xmath54 , indicate no angular momentum between the final state onium and the dipion system , although the former result is also consistent@xcite with a few percent of @xmath51-wave ; and ( c ) , the average ( weighted by the observed distribution of di - pion invariant mass , @xmath58 ) of the @xmath51-wave between the two pions in @xmath59@xcite is less than 10% . as shown in table [ tab : allowed ] , the entry and exit branching fractions@xcite strongly disfavor our observation of @xmath60 .
we also had to discriminate against this possible mode in order to suppress our dominant background source , `` @xmath29 '' , in that there is overlap in the energies of the e1 transition photon for the @xmath60 signal process and that of the dominant @xmath61 mode of that background .
therefore , we assumed that the transitions with @xmath62 or @xmath63 dominate . to estimate the relative abundance of these two transitions and , later , to calculate the partial width @xmath64 , we needed the _ full _ widths @xmath65 and @xmath66 .
we calculated these using the theoretical e1 partial widths for these two states@xcite and their experimental e1 branching fractions@xcite to @xmath67(1s ) and @xmath67(2s ) , where in the latter we took into account the new cleo iii value@xcite of @xmath68 .
our results , also listed in table [ tab : allowed ] , are @xmath69 kev and @xmath70 kev . given @xmath71 from this table we expected the @xmath62 transition to dominate @xmath72 by roughly a factor of 2.3 .
.the three di - pion transitions between @xmath73 and @xmath0 that leave the orbital angular momentum unchanged ( @xmath52-wave ) .
the third column is the mass difference .
columns four and five are the branching fractions for the entrance and exit e1 transitions : @xmath74(3s)@xmath75 and @xmath76(1s ) ) .
the e1 transition from @xmath77 is unobserved , with a limit of 6% on its branching fraction at 90% c.l .. [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] the individual contributions to eqn .
[ eqn : defining ] are shown in table [ tab : contributions ] , along with the value of @xmath64 obtained , its statistical uncertainty , and its individual ( cleo - based ) systematic uncertainty . taking the _ statistical _ average of the three gives @xmath78 } = ( 0.84 \pm 0.22)$ ] kev .
a more complete average takes into account the individual systematic uncertainties ; this weighted average is @xmath79 kev . following the pdg@xcite prescription for evaluating the consistency of results
being averaged , we obtain an uncertainty scale factor of 1.09 , which is close to unity .
de - convolving the statistical uncertainty and adding in a separate term for the 22% `` common '' uncertainties that are not based on measurements in this analysis yields our final result of @xmath80 with the uncertainties being statistical , systematics from our analyses , and systematics from outside sources .
this result for @xmath22 can be compared to values derived from the pdg@xcite of @xmath81 ) kev for a process with somewhat less @xmath54 and @xmath82 kev for a process with considerably more @xmath54 .
our result is consistent with the theoretical expectations of kuang and yan@xcite , who have calculated @xmath83 kev . in summary , we have searched the cleo iii data at the @xmath2 resonance for the decay @xmath22 using four different approaches .
the combined probability that the signal process is absent is small , leading to the conclusion that the null hypothesis can not be substantiated . under the assumption of no @xmath51-wave contributions
we obtain a partial width for each of the @xmath62 and @xmath72 transitions of @xmath84 .
we gratefully acknowledge the effort of the cesr staff in providing us with excellent luminosity and running conditions .
this work was supported by the national science foundation and the u.s .
department of energy . | heavy quarkonia @xmath10 or good laboratories strong interaction large data samples at cleo / cesr bes / bepc renewed interest heavy quarkonia electric dipole transitions from @xmath2 @xmath13 unexplored dominant hadronic transitions involve di - pion emission two soft gluons hadronize di - pion system studied for transitions quarkonia @xmath16 states not observed in other transitions @xmath17 @xmath13 decays subject work interest in @xmath13 decays generated cleo observation large branching fraction decay @xmath18 only known hadronic decay of @xmath19 @xmath20 states only hadronic bottomonium transition not through @xmath21 investigated another hadronic transition @xmath13 @xmath22 search starts with e1 transition @xmath23 signal process @xmath22 resulting @xmath0 decay transition @xmath24 @xmath5 final state two photons low - momentum pions high - momentum leptons establish @xmath13 decay estimate partial width @xmath25(2p)@xmath1(1p)@xmath26 background signal in fig . has @xmath27 followed e1 cascade @xmath0 to @xmath28 background process @xmath29 same pions leptons photons similar kinematics stringent selection criteria provides known process nearly identical final state analysis procedures data collected at cornell electron storage ring cleo iii@xcite detector configuration components cs - i electromagnetic calorimeter charged particle tracking system covering @xmath3093% @xmath31 solid angle 7800 crystals calorimeter cleo ii configuration for cleo iii coverage shower energy resolution @xmath32 4% at 100 mev 2% at 1 gev in barrel region @xmath33 @xmath34 dip angle beam axis 4-layer double - sided silicon vertex detector new drift chamber@xcite installed for cleo iii design minimizes material resolution solid angle coverage to @xmath35 signal searched in 1.39 fb@xmath36 data center mass energy @xmath2 resonance @xmath37 resonance decays@xcite used 8.6 fb@xmath36 data at @xmath38 gev 0.fb@xmath36 data @xmath12 @xmath39 decays@xcite study evaluate backgrounds used monte carlo simulations geant3.211/11@xcite estimate efficiencies tune selection criteria signal process simulated main background process @xmath29 described fig . @xmath27 with @xmath40 higher statistics similar pion kinematics confirm efficiency determinations @xmath27 with @xmath41 signal multiplicity if two photons missed generic @xmath2 monte carlo uses properties modes @xmath2 decay backgrounds tagged not analyzed @xmath42 continuum processes @xmath2 center mass energy charged pion decay channel @xmath43 with @xmath18 and @xmath44 same initial photon transition additional photon decay @xmath45 @xmath46 decay to @xmath47 neutral pion decay channel @xmath48 with @xmath49 used @xmath50 present 90% cl upper limit decay assumed no @xmath51-wave contributions decays only @xmath52-wave @xmath53 assumption supported by maximum energy @xmath54 for nine decays is = 130 mev difficult extra kinetic energy two units angular momentum previous studies of @xmath2 @xmath54 indicate no angular momentum between final state onium and dipion system result consistent with percent @xmath51-wave average @xmath58 of @xmath51-wave between two pions in @xmath59@xcite less than 10% entry exit branching fractions disfavor observation of @xmath60 had to discriminate against mode to suppress dominant background source @xmath29 overlap in energies e1 transition photon for @xmath60 signal process @xmath61 mode assumed transitions with @xmath62 or @xmath63 dominate to estimate abundance of transitions calculate partial width @xmath64 needed full widths @xmath65 and @xmath66 calculated using theoretical e1 partial widths for states and experimental e1 branching fractions to @xmath67(1s and ) new cleo iii value of @xmath68 results are @xmath69 kev and @xmath70 kev @xmath71 expected @xmath62 transition dominate @xmath72 factor 2.3 three di - pion transitions between @xmath73 @xmath0 leave orbital angular momentum unchanged @xmath52-wave ) third column mass difference columns four five branching fractions entrance exit e1 transitions @xmath74(3s)@xmath75 @xmath76(1s ) e1 transition from @xmath77 unobserved limit 6% branching fraction 90% c.l individual contributions to eqn shown table value @xmath64 statistical uncertainty individual systematic uncertainty statistical average gives @xmath78 = ( 0.84 0.22)$ ] kev complete average individual systematic uncertainties weighted average @xmath79 kev pdg@xcite prescription uncertainty scale factor 1.09 close to unity de - convolving statistical uncertainty separate term 22% common uncertainties final result @xmath80 uncertainties statistical systematics analyses systematics outside sources result @xmath22 compared to values pdg@xcite @xmath81 kev less @xmath54 @xmath82 kev more @xmath54result consistent with expectations kuang yan calculated @xmath83 kev searched cleo iii data @xmath2 resonance for decay @xmath22 four approaches probability signal process absent small null hypothesis no @xmath51-wave contributions partial width for @xmath62 @xmath72 transitions of @xmath84 acknowledge effort cesr staff excellent luminosity running conditions work supported by national science foundation u.s. department of energy | 0.348628 | 2,275 | 1,213 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,943 | we have investigated the two rare - earth intermetallic compounds prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 by means of magnetization , electrical resistivity and heat capacity measurements . while prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 exhibits an antiferromagnetic ordering at 3 k , no magnetic ordering is observed in prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 down to 2 k. the different magnetic behaviors of these two compounnds are due to different crystalline electric field ( cef ) level schemes .
the specific heat data suggest a quasi - quartet ground state in prpd@xmath1si@xmath1 in contrast to a nonmagnetic singlet ground state in prpt@xmath1si@xmath1 .
this difference is attributed to the loss of a mirror plane upon changing the crystal structure from the thcr@xmath1si@xmath1 type ( prpd@xmath1si@xmath1 ) to the cabe@xmath1ge@xmath1 type ( prpt@xmath1si@xmath1 ) .
further on , a large magnetoresistance is also observed in the magnetically ordered state of prpd@xmath1si@xmath1 . | pr - based intermetallic compounds have evolved as a topic of current interest among the condensed matter physicists as some of these compounds exhibit interesting physical properties .
while in ce - compounds the relative strengths of the rkky and kondo interactions decide the ground state properties , in case of pr - compounds the ground state depends critically on the crystal electric field ( cef ) level scheme .
for example , in pros@xmath2sb@xmath3 a small cef splitting energy of 0.7 mev and quadrupolar excitations lead to unconventional heavy - fermion superconductivity [ 1 - 3 ] .
pr@xmath0rh@xmath4ge@xmath5 exhibits heavy fermion behaviour in which low lying crystal field excitations are responsible for the mass enhancement instead of the the usual kondo effect @xcite .
we have also investigated prrh@xmath0si@xmath0 in view of the unusual superconducting and magnetic properties of cerh@xmath0si@xmath0 and ybrh@xmath0si@xmath0 .
we found an antiferromagnetic ordering at 68 k in prrh@xmath0si@xmath0 which is anomalously high compared to the expected de - gennes - scaled transition temperature of 5.4 k @xcite .
further , we decided to investigate prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 in view of the interesting features of cepd@xmath0si@xmath0 and cept@xmath0si@xmath0 .
while cepd@xmath0si@xmath0 is a heavy - fermion antiferromagnet system which exhibits pressure induced superconductivity @xcite , cept@xmath0si@xmath0 is a kondo lattice non - fermi liquid system that does not order down to 60 mk @xcite .
a preliminary magnetization study on prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 reports it to be paramagnetic down to 1.8 k @xcite .
we report here our results of magnetization , electrical resistivity , and heat capacity studies of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 .
polycrystalline samples of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 and their la - analogs were prepared by standard arc - melting on a water cooled copper hearth under an inert argon atmosphere starting with high purity ( 99.99% and above ) elements in stoichiometric ratio . to ensure a proper mixing of the constituents ,
arc melted ingots were flipped and remelted several times .
weight loss during the melting process was less than 0.5% .
the samples were annealed at 1000 @xmath6c for one week to improve the sample quality .
thereafter , the samples were characterized using powder x - ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy ( sem ) equipped with energy dispersive x - ray analysis ( edax ) .
magnetization measurements were performed using a commercial squid magnetometer .
the heat capacity was measured using relaxation method in a physical property measurement system ( ppms - quantum design ) .
the electrical resistivity was measured by four probe ac technique using the ac transport option of ppms .
while the compounds prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 , lapd@xmath0si@xmath0 crystallize in thcr@xmath0si@xmath0-type tetragonal structure ( space - group _ i4/mmm _ ) , prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 and lapt@xmath0si@xmath0 form in cabe@xmath0ge@xmath0-type primitive tetragonal structure ( space group _ p4/nmm _ ) .
the lattice parameters and unit cell volumes for these compounds are listed in table 1 .
the lattice parameters obtained for prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 , lapt@xmath0si@xmath0 , and lapd@xmath0si@xmath0 are close to the values reported in references @xcite and @xcite .
though all the peaks in x - ray diffraction pattern of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 are well indexed , the scanning electron micrographs show the presence of impurity phase(s ) which we estimated to be less than 3% in prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and about 6% in prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 .
the edax analysis confirms the desired stoichiometry of 1:2:2 .
.[tab : table1 ] lattice parameters and unit cell volumes of tetragonal compounds rt@xmath0si@xmath0 ( r = la , pr and t = pd , pt ) . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
the magnetic susceptibility data of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 are shown in figure 1 .
magnetic susceptibility follows the curie - weiss behavior above 50 k. fitting the inverse susceptibility data to the expression 1/@xmath7 = ( @xmath8)/@xmath9 , we obtained an effective moment @xmath10 = 3.59 @xmath11 ( theoretically expected value for pr@xmath12 ions is 3.58 @xmath11 ) and a weiss temperature @xmath13 = - 4.2 k. the low temperature susceptibility data ( shown in the inset of figure 1 ) show a peak at 3.5 k. the position of the peak shifts towards lower temperatures with increasing field , thereby confirming the antiferromagnetic nature of the transition at 3.5 k. the isothermal magnetization data at 2 k ( figure 2 ) exhibits a very smooth metamagnetic - type transition at 4.8 t. the critical field for the metamagnetic transition is determined from the @xmath14 _ vs. _ @xmath15 plot ( inset of figure 2 ) .
no saturation is observed upto b = 6.0 t. the magnetic field dependence of magnetization of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 at 2 and 10 k. the inset shows the derivative of magnetization data at 2 k.,width=377 ] the magnetic contribution to the specific heat of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 as a function of temperature in the temperature range 0.5
52 k. the solid line represents the fit for equally degenerate two level schottky anomaly with a separation of 50 k. the inset shows the temperature dependence of magnetic entropy.,width=377 ] figure 3 shows the magnetic contribution to the specific heat of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 which we obtained after subtracting the lattice contribution assuming it to be roughly equal to that of the nonmagnetic analog lapd@xmath0si@xmath0 .
the specific heat data of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 exhibits a sharp @xmath16-type peak at 3 k which confirms the intrinsic nature of magnetic order in this compound .
the magnetic entropy reaches a value close to @xmath17 (= 11.52 j / mole - k ) at 7.5 k , suggesting a quasi - quartet ground state .
we also observe a pronounced schottky type anomaly with a broad maximum centered around 20 k which we attribute to the crystal field effect .
the position of schottky peak suggests that the excited states lie about 50 k above the low lying cef states .
the peak height of the schottky anomaly is consistent with equal degeneracy between the low lying states and the excited states , suggesting the presence of four cef levels close to 50 k. in a tetragonal symmetry one expects the cef levels of pr@xmath12 to split into five singlets and two doublets .
thus in prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 , the temperature dependence of the entropy indicate a separation into four low lying levels ( either two doublets , or one doublet and two singlets , or four singlets ) separated by less than 10 k , four further levels around 50 k , and an upper singlet at much higher energy . since in rpd@xmath0si@xmath0
the cef schemes seem to be determined by the higher order terms in the cef hamiltonian @xcite , a simple preliminary guess of the cef sheme of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 can not be given .
temperature dependence of electrical resistivity of prpd@xmath1si@xmath1 in the temperature range 2 300 k. the upper inset shows the low temperature resistivity data at different fields .
the lower inset shows the magnetoresistance normalized to @xmath18 at b = 0.,width=415 ] in the paramagnetic regime the electrical resistivity decreases almost linearly with decreasing temperature ( figure 4 ) and merge into a constant value of 5.5 @xmath19-cm below 10 k. the resistivity drops rapidly below the ordering temperature due to reduction of spin disorder scattering .
the resistivity at 2 k , where @xmath18 is still decreasing with t , is 3.4 @xmath19-cm leading to a lower bound of @xmath20 15 for the residual resistivity ratio .
this evidences a good quality of our polycrystalline sample .
the upper inset of figure 4 shows the effect of a magnetic field on the resistivity .
the resistivity anomaly related to the magnetic order smoothens out for b @xmath21 2 t. the magnetoresistance @xmath22/@xmath23 = [ @xmath23(@xmath15)-@xmath23(0)]/@xmath23(0 ) is shown in the lower inset of figure 4 . in the ordered state ( at 2 k ) the magnetoresistance initially increases with increasing field , peaks at 6 t and decreases for higher fields .
such a behavior of the magnetoresistance is expected for an antiferromagnetic state . for t @xmath24 t@xmath25
, an increasing magnetic field is first weakening the af - state , leading to an increase of spin scattering , but above the metamagnetic transition the formation of the field aligned state results in a decrease of spin scattering . in the paramagnetic state
the magnetoresistane is always negative , since alignment of the moments in the external field reduces the spin scattering .
thus , magnetic susceptibility , magnetization , specific heat and magnetoresistance data provide conclusive evidence for an antiferromagnetic state in prpd@xmath1si@xmath1 below 3.0 k.
figure 5 shows the magnetic susceptibility data of prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 .
no anomaly is observed in susceptibility data down to 2 k implying the absence of magnetic ordering in this compound . the paramagnetic susceptibility displays a curie - weiss character . from a fit of the inverse susceptibility data above 50 k to the expression 1/@xmath7
= ( @xmath8)/@xmath9 we found the effective moment to be @xmath10 = 3.46 @xmath11 which is very close to the value of 3.58 @xmath11 expected for pr@xmath12 ions .
the curie - weiss temperature @xmath13 = + 18.8 k indicates dominant ferromagnetic exchange in this compound .
the isothermal magnetization curve is linear with field at 2 and 20 k which is consistent with a paramagnetic state down to 2 k in this compound .
inverse magnetic susceptibility plot of prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 at a field of 1.0 t. the inset shows magnetization as a function of field at two different temperatures of 2 and 20 k.,width=377 ] temperature dependence of magnetic contribution to the specific heat of prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 in the temperature range ( 2 50 k ) .
the inset shows the temperature dependence of magnetic entropy.,width=377 ] the magnetic contribution to the specific heat of prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 ( figure 6 ) was obtained by subtracting the specific heat data of lapt@xmath0si@xmath0 from that of prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 .
no signature of magnetic or superconducting transition is observed in the specific heat data , which is consistent with the paramagnetic ground state inferred from the magnetic susceptibility data . from the low temperature specific heat data we estimate a @xmath26 value of @xmath20 3 mj / mole - k@xmath27 .
such a low magnitude of specific heat at low t rules out the possibility of magnetic ordering even at lower temperature .
a broad schottky type anomaly is observed in the magnetic part of the specific heat above 20 k. the upturn in the magnetic contribution ( c@xmath28 ) to the specific heat around 10 k could be reproduced with a first excited doublet separated from the singlet ground state by approximately 50 k. for the case of a singlet ground state and a doublet as first excited state one would expect a peak height of 6.2 j / mole - k in c@xmath28 .
however , the experimentally observed value is 9.2 j / mole - k , clearly indicating that further higher lying states are also contributing .
the large separation between the singlet ground state and the first excited state is responsible for the absence of magnetic order in prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 .
usually the cef schemes of homologous rt@xmath1x@xmath1 compounds with different t- ( or x- ) elements of one row in the periodic table are quite similar , because neither the effective ionic charge at the ligands nor their distance to the r - atoms changes significantly .
thus , in the present case , the strong differences between the cef schemes of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 are very likely related to the loss of a mirror plane at the pr - site upon changing the crystal structure from the thcr@xmath1si@xmath1 to the cabe@xmath1ge@xmath1 type , although both structure types are closely related .
this difference in the structures is likely also responsible for the change from dominant antiferromagnetic exchange in the pd - based compound to dominant ferromagnetic exchange in the pt - based compound .
we have investigated magnetic properties of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 . from a detailed measurements of magnetization , specific heat , electrical resistivity and magnetoresistance we have established antiferromagnetic ordering in prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 below 3 k. below t@xmath25 this compound also exhibits field induced metamagnetic transition and large magnetoresistance ( 20% ) at a magnetic field of 6 tesla . in contrast ,
no magnetic order is observed in prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 down to 2 k. we attribute this paramagnetic ground state in prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 to the cef scheme with a singlet ground state and well separated first excited state located around 50 k. the pronounced differences between prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 are attributed to the loss of a mirror plane upon changing the crystal structure from the thcr@xmath1si@xmath1 to the cabe@xmath1ge@xmath1 type .
further investigations are needed to determine the exact magnetic structure of prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 and the crystal field level schemes in these two compounds . | pr - based intermetallic compounds condensed matter physicists interesting physical properties ce - compounds rkky kondo interactions decide ground state pr - compounds state crystal electric field cef level scheme pros@xmath2sb@xmath3 small cef splitting energy 0.7 mev quadrupolar excitations heavy - fermion superconductivity pr@xmath0rh@xmath4ge@xmath5 heavy fermion behaviour low crystal field excitations mass enhancement kondo effect investigated prrh@xmath0si@xmath0 superconducting magnetic properties antiferromagnetic ordering at 68 k in prrh@xmath0si high de - gennes - scaled transition temperature 5.4 k @xcite prpd@xmath0si prpt@xmath0si features cepd heavy - fermion antiferromagnet system pressure induced superconductivity cept@xmath0si kondo lattice non - fermi liquid system order down to 60 mk @xcite preliminary study prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 paramagnetic down to 1.8 k @xcitereport results magnetization electrical resistivity heat capacity studies prpd@xmath0si prpt@xmath0si polycrystalline samples la - analogs prepared standard arc - melting water cooled copper hearth inert argon atmosphere high purity 99.99% elements mixing melted ingots flipped remelted several times weight loss less than 0.5% samples annealed at 1000 @xmath6c one week quality samples characterized using powder x - ray diffraction scanning electron microscopy dispersive x - ray analysis magnetization measurements commercial squid magnetometer heat capacity measured relaxation method electrical resistivity measured by four probe ac technique compounds prpd lapd@xmath0si crystallize in thcr@xmath0si-type tetragonal structure prpt lapt@xmath0si form in cabe@xmath0ge@xmath0-type primitive tetragonal structure lattice parameters unit cell volumes compounds listed in table 1lattice parameters for prpt@xmath0si lapt@xmath0si close to values @xcite peaks in x - ray diffraction pattern indexed electron micrographs show impurity phase(s less than 3% in prpd 6% in edax analysis confirms stoichiometry 1:2:2 lattice parameters unit cell volumes of tetragonal compounds rt@xmath0si@xmath0 r = la pr t = pd pt magnetic susceptibility data of prpd@xmath0si in figure 1 follows curie - weiss behavior above 50 k inverse susceptibility data to effective moment @xmath10 = 3.59 @xmath11 3.58 weiss temperature @xmath13 = - 4.2 k low temperature susceptibility data show peak at 3.5 k shifts towards lower temperatures with field antiferromagnetic nature transition at 3.5 k isothermal magnetization data at 2 k smooth metamagnetic - type transition at 4.8 t critical field for transition from @xmath14 _ vs.@xmath15 plot figure 2 no saturation upto b = 6.0 t magnetic field dependence magnetization prpd@xmath0si@xmath0 at 2 10 k derivative magnetization data 2 k magnetic contribution heat function temperature 0.5 52 k solid line two level schottky anomaly separation 50 k temperature dependence magnetic entropy figure 3 magnetic contribution heat prpd@xmath0si subtracting lattice contribution equal nonmagnetic analog@xmath0si heat data @xmath16-type peak at 3 k magnetic order magnetic entropy close to @xmath17 (= 11.52 j / mole - k ) at 7.5 k quasi - quartet ground state schottky type anomaly maximum around 20 k crystal field effect schottky peak excited states 50 k above low cef states peak height schottky anomaly consistent equal degeneracy four cef levels close to 50 k tetragonal symmetry cef levels pr@xmath12 split five singlets two doubletsprpd@xmath0si temperature dependence entropy separation into four low levels separated by less than 10 k four levels around 50 k upper singlet higher energy rpd cef schemes determined by higher order terms hamiltonian @xcite guess cef sheme temperature dependence electrical resistivity of prpd@xmath1si temperature 2 300 k upper inset low temperature resistivity fields lower magnetoresistance normalized to @xmath18 at b paramagnetic regime electrical resistivity decreases with decreasing temperature constant 5.5 @xmath19-cm below 10 k resistivity drops below ordering temperature reduction spin disorder scattering resistivity at 2 k @xmath18 3.4 @xmath19-cm lower bound of @xmath20 15 residual resistivity ratio quality polycrystalline sample upper effect magnetic field on resistivity resistivity anomaly magnetic order smoothens for @xmath21 2 t magnetoresistance @xmath22/@xmath23 =(0 in lower inset ordered state 2 k magnetoresistance increases with field peaks at 6 t decreases for higher fieldsmagnetoresistance expected for antiferromagnetic state increasing magnetic field af - state spin scattering above metamagnetic transition field aligned state spin scattering paramagnetic state magnetoresistane negative alignment reduces spin scattering magnetic susceptibility magnetization specific heat magnetoresistance data antiferromagnetic state in prpd@xmath1si below 3.0 k figure 5 magnetic susceptibility data prpt@xmath0si no anomaly in susceptibility down to 2 k absence magnetic ordering paramagnetic susceptibility displays curie - weiss character above 50 k effective moment @xmath10 = 3.46 @xmath11 close to 3.58 @xmath11 for pr@xmath12 ions curie - weiss temperature @xmath13 = + 18.8 k dominant ferromagnetic exchange isothermal magnetization curve linear with field at 2 and 20 k consistent with paramagnetic state down to 2 k inverse magnetic susceptibility plot at field 1.0 t magnetization function field at temperatures 2 20 k temperature dependence magnetic contribution heat prpt@xmath0si magnetic entropy=377 magnetic contribution to heat prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 figure 6 obtained subtracting data lapt@xmath0si from prpt@xmath0si no magnetic superconducting transition in consistent with paramagnetic ground state low temperature data @xmath26 value 3 mj / mole - k@xmath27 low magnitude heat low rules out magnetic ordering lower temperature schottky type anomaly in magnetic part above 20 k upturn in magnetic contribution c@xmath28 around 10 k reproduced with first excited doublet separated from singlet ground state by 50 k peak height 6.2 j / mole - k in c@xmath28 value 9.2 j / mole - k higher states contributing large separation between singlet ground first excited state absence magnetic order in prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 cef schemes of homologous rt@xmath1x@xmath1 compounds elements similar effective ionic charge at ligands distance to r - atoms changesdifferences between cef schemes prpd@xmath0si prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 likely related to loss mirror plane pr - site changing crystal structure from thcr@xmath1si to cabe@xmath1ge related difference responsible for change from antiferromagnetic exchange to ferromagnetic exchange investigated magnetic properties of established antiferromagnetic ordering in prpd@xmath0si below 3 k below@xmath25 field induced metamagnetic transition large magnetoresistance ( 20% ) at field 6 tesla no magnetic order in prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 down to 2 k paramagnetic ground state in prpt@xmath0si@xmath0 to cef scheme singlet ground state separated first excited state around 50 k differences between prpd attributed to loss of mirror plane changing crystal structure from thcr@xmath1si to cabe further investigations needed magnetic structure of prpd@xmath0si crystal field level schemes | 0.502122 | 3,438 | 1,723 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,949 | the _ infrared space observatory _ ( iso ) has shown the complexity of the galactic center ( gc ) interstellar medium ( ism ) detecting , not only large column densities of warm molecular gas ( h@xmath0 ) , but the emission of neutral atoms and ions of low ionization potential ( cii , oi , siii , ... ) that should arise in shocked or photon - dominated regions ( pdrs ) .
in addition , iso has also detected emission from ions like siii , neii , arii , or nii ( in some clouds we have even detected neiii and oiii ) that should arise from hii regions that were previously unsuspected due to the non - detection of hydrogen recombination lines .
here we review some iso results on the large scale study of the gc ism and in particular , on the heating mechanisms of the clouds .
although , shocks should play an important role on the physics and chemistry of the gc ism , iso shows that the effect of radiation on the heating of the gas can not be ruled out with the simple argument that the dust temperature is lower than that of the gas . | in the few hundred central parsecs of the galaxy ( hereafter gc ) clouds are denser ( @xmath1 ) , more turbulent ( @xmath2 km s@xmath3 ) , and hotter than the clouds of the galactic disk .
there is a widespread warm gas component with temperatures of 100 - 200 k first known by nh@xmath4 observations ( see e.g. @xcite ) and now studied in detail with h@xmath0 pure - rotational lines observations by iso ( @xcite , hereafter rf01 ) .
the heating of the warm gas component over large regions where the dust temperatures are much lower than those of the gas is a puzzle .
the discrepancy between the dust and the gas temperature is usually considered to imply a mechanical , rather than radiative , heating mechanism ( @xcite , @xcite ) . with the purpose of investigating the heating mechanisms of the gc molecular clouds
, we have studied a sample of 18 clouds distributed all along the cmz ( central molecular zone ) at millimeter and infrared wavelengths using the iso and the iram-30 m telescopes .
iso has allowed us to study the thermal balance of the gc clouds by observing the major coolants of the gas with temperatures of a few hundred kelvin like h@xmath0 , oi , or cii . in the following
we will review what we have learned from infrared ( ir ) and mm wavelength studies in the field of the large scale study of the gc ism .
we have observed the j=1 - 0 and j=2 - 1 lines of @xmath5 and @xmath6 with the iram-30 m telescope .
the j=2 - 1 to j=1 - 0 line ratios are compatible with cold ( 20 k ) and dense gas ( 10@xmath7 ) or warmer ( @xmath8 100 k ) but less dense gas ( 10@xmath9 ) . however , the column densities derived in both cases are rather similar . in general ,
if one considers a mixture of cold and warm gas the total column densities traced by co will be similar to those derived for gas at 20 k , which vary from source to source but are in the range of @xmath10 ( rf01 ) we have observed several @xmath11 pure - rotational lines ( from the s(0 ) to s(5 ) lines ) with the sws spectrometer on board iso .
the s(3 ) line is strongly absorbed by the 9.7 band of the silicates and has only been detected in the sources with the most intense s(1 ) emission .
the visual extinction derived from the @xmath11 data is @xmath12 mag . after correcting for extinction one
finds that the excitation temperature derived from the s(0 ) and s(1 ) lines ( @xmath13 ) is between 130 and 200 k while that derived from the s(4 ) and s(5 ) lines when detected is 500 - 700 k. there is not a clear dependence of @xmath13 on the distance to the galactic center . extrapolating the populations in the j=2 and j=3 levels ( as derived from the s(0 ) and
s(1 ) lines ) to the j=0 and j=1 levels at the temperature @xmath13 one finds that the total warm @xmath11 column density varies from source to source but is typically of 1 - 2 @xmath14 .
the column density of gas at @xmath15 k is less than @xmath16 of the column density at @xmath17 k. on average , the warm @xmath11 column densities are about @xmath18 of the total @xmath11 column densities derived from co. for a few clouds the fraction of warm gas is as high as 77@xmath19 or even @xmath20 .
this implies that for these clouds almost all of the co emission should arise from warm gas ( see rf01 ) .
comparing with the observations of @xcite one finds relatively high abundances of a few 10@xmath21 in both the warm and the cold gas .
there are indirect arguments that points both to shocks and to photo - dissociation regions ( pdrs ) as the heating mechanism of the warm gas ( see rf01 for a complete discussion ) .
direct comparison of the @xmath11 data with pdrs and shocks models ( see fig .
[ figexcith2 ] ) indicate that the s(4 ) and s(5 ) lines trace the densest gas in the gc clouds ( 10@xmath22 ) heated in pdrs , shocks , or both . nevertheless , to explain the large column densities of gas at @xmath17 k traced by the s(0 ) and s(1 ) lines several less dense pdrs ( with @xmath23 and @xmath24 ) or low velocity shocks ( @xmath25 ) in the line of sight are required .
the curvature of the the population diagrams is in agreement with the temperature gradient expected in a pdr ( fig .
[ figexcith2]b ) but probably also with a composition of shocks with different velocities . in summary , it is difficult to know if the @xmath11 emission arises in pdrs or shocked regions .
with both the lws and sws spectrometers on board iso we have detected fine structure lines of ions like [ n ii ] 122 , [ siii ] 33 and 18 or [ ne ii ] 12 in most sources .
we have even detected [ n iii ] 57 , [ o iii ] 88 and 52 or [ ne iii ] 15.6 in the few sources located closer to the galactic center .
all these lines of ions with high excitational potentials must arise in h ii regions .
otherwise , one needs to invoke j - shocks with velocities 100 and there is no hint of such strong shocks from the line profiles or the radial velocities of any observed line .
we derive effective temperatures for the ionizing radiation of @xmath26 k , typical of an o7 star ( see @xcite , 2000 ) . we have observed the h35@xmath27 and h@xmath28 recombination lines in all the sources of our sample with the iram-30 m telescope .
we have not detected any of these lines in any source ( @xcite , 2000 ) .
assuming line widths as large as 100 and an electron temperature ( @xmath29 ) of 8000 k we can set a conservative _ upper limit _ to the number of lyman continuum photons emitted per second by the excitation source of @xmath30 .
this rate is typical of a star with a spectral type b0 or later and effective temperature @xmath31 k. this implies that the number of lyman continuum photons derived from the radio recombination lines is not the total number of those photons emitted by the ionizing source .
the apparent inconsistency between the radio recombination lines and the fine structure lines disappears if one considers that the hii regions are more extended than the 30-m telescope beam , e.g. , that the ionizing stars are surrounded by cavities with sizes of @xmath32 pc ( @xcite , 2000 ) .
figure [ figdustall ] shows the dust continuum spectra toward a representative sample of sources .
any other spectrum is very similar to one of those in fig .
[ figdustall ] .
the wavelength of the maximum of emission varies from @xmath33 for m+0.76 - 0.05 and other sources with galactic longitude @xmath34 to @xmath35 for the sources located in the sgr c region and even to @xmath36 for a few sources located close to the radio arc . to explain the dust emission one needs at least two grey bodies .
figure [ figfitdust ] displays the dust emission of the sources with coldest ( m+0.76 - 0.05 ) and warmest dust ( m+0.21 - 0.12 ) together with the predictions of a model with two grey bodies at different temperatures . for the predictions
we have used the following expression : @xmath37\ ] ] where @xmath38 represents the planck function and the opacity , @xmath39 , is given by : @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the visual extinction in magnitudes and @xmath42 expressed in .
this model assumes that the warmer component is being extinguished by the colder one .
taking @xmath43 ( the lws beam ) we obtain good fits for the values of the parameters listed table [ tabfit ] .
lllll + source & @xmath44 & @xmath45 & @xmath46 & @xmath47 + + m+0.76 - 0.05 & 49 & 1.5 & 16 & 10 + & 7.5 & 1 & 30 & 1 + m+0.21 - 0.12 & 50 & 1.5 & 16 & 6 + & 2.2 & 1 & 47 & 1 + + to explain the emission at large @xmath42 s it is necessary a grey body with temperature @xmath48 k. the visual extinction associated to this component would be 3050 mag . to explain the large fluxes observed at large @xmath42 s , filling factors ( @xmath47 ) @xmath49 are needed .
the temperature of the cold component does not vary much from source to source .
in addition to the cold dust component a warmer one is also required .
this component would fill the beam and its temperature varies from source to source from the @xmath12 k of m+0.75 - 0.05 , m+3.06 + 0.34 and m+1.56 - 0.30 ( @xcite ) to the @xmath50 k of m+0.21 - 0.12 and m+0.35 - 0.06 .
the visual extinction associated to this component would be @xmath8 2 - 8 mag , that is , 5 - 10 @xmath19 of the extinction due to the cold dust component . clearly , a heating mechanism is needed to raise the dust temperature from @xmath48 k to 30 k or even 45 k. for the standard dust - to - gas ratio the extinction caused by the warm dust component is equivalent to a @xmath11 column density of 2 - 8 @xmath51 .
these equivalent column densities are only a factor of 2 lower than the column densities of warm gas as derived from the @xmath11 pure - rotational lines .
the simplest explanation is that both the warm gas and dust arise in low - density pdrs like those modeled by @xcite . in the external layers of the pdr
the gas is heated via photoelectric effect in the grain surfaces without heating the dust to high temperatures .
for instance , in their standard " model ( @xmath24 and @xmath23 ) , the gas can reach temperatures of 100200 k in the first 3 mag of visual extinction into the cloud where on average the dust temperature would be @xmath52 k ( see fig . 3 of @xcite ) .
those values for the pdr parameters are quite reasonable for the gc ism at large scale based on average densities and the far - ir continuum ( see discussion in @xcite ) .
pdr models with @xmath53 and @xmath54 can also explain the @xmath11 excitation temperatures traced by the s(0 ) and s(1 ) lines and the large scale emission of the @xmath11 @xmath55 s(1 ) line ( @xcite ) .
in this scenario , the warm dust component would be located at the gc while the cold dust emission would arise both from the gc clouds and from clouds in the line of sight ( typically @xmath56 mag of visual extinction are due to material located between us and the gc region ) .
iso has , for the first time , measured directly the column densities of warm molecular gas in the gc . on average ,
the warm @xmath11 represents a fraction of @xmath18 of the total @xmath11 column densities derived from @xmath6 and @xmath5 observations .
iso has also detected fine structure lines of ions with high ionization potential that should arise from hii regions .
the comparison of the fine structure lines with hydrogen recombination lines at mm wavelengths shows evidences for an extended ionized component with high effective radiation temperature .
this suggest the presence of a pdr in the interface between the hii region and the molecular material that should contribute to the heating of the warm gas and the dust component with temperatures of 30 - 45 k. there are many evidences that shocks play an important role in the physics and chemistry of the gc ism .
the high abundances of molecules which are easily photodissociated like , sio ( @xcite ) and c@xmath0h@xmath57oh ( @xcite ) suggest that they should be sputtered from the grains by shocks .
nevertheless , iso points out that the effect of uv radiation on the gc ism ( and in particular on the heating of the molecular gas ) can not be ruled out with the simple argument that the dust temperature is lower than that of the gas .
first will help to understand the energetics of the gc ism .
for instance , the high spectral and spatial resolution that the hifi instrument will achieve , will be of great interest to study the interplay between the ionized material and the warm molecular gas .
njr - f acknowledges _ consejera de educacin cultura de la comunidad de madrid _ for a pre - doctoral fellowship .
this work has been partially supported by the spanish cicyt and the european commission under grant numbers esp-1291-e and 1fd1997 - 1442 . | hundred central parsecs galaxy gc ) clouds denser @xmath1 turbulent @xmath2@xmath3 hotter than clouds galactic disk widespread warm gas component temperatures 100 - 200 k known by nh@xmath4 observations now studied with h@xmath0 rotational lines observations iso heating warm gas over large regions dust temperatures lower gas puzzle discrepancy dust gas temperature mechanical heating mechanism investigating heating mechanisms gc molecular clouds studied 18 clouds cmz zone millimeter infrared wavelengths using iso iram-30 m telescopes iso thermal balance gc clouds observing major coolants gas temperatures few hundred kelvin@xmath0 review from infrared mm wavelength studies large scale study gc ism observed j=1 - 0 j=2 - 1 lines of @xmath5 @xmath6 with iram-30 m telescope j=2 - 1 to - 0 line ratios compatible with cold ( 20 k dense gas 10@xmath7 ) warmer @xmath8 100 k less dense gas 10@xmath9 ) column densities both similarmixture cold warm gas column densities by co similar to gas at 20 k vary range of @xmath10 observed @xmath11 pure - rotational lines s(0 ) to s(5 ) with sws spectrometer s(3 ) line absorbed by 9.7 band silicates detected in sources intense s(1 ) emission visual extinction from @xmath11 is @xmath12 mag excitation temperature from s(0 ) s(1 ) lines between 130 and 200 k s(4 ) s(5 ) lines 500 - 700 k dependence of @xmath13 on distance to galactic center extrapolating populations in j=2 j=3 levels to j=0 j=1 levels at temperature @xmath13 total warm @xmath11 column density varies typically 1 - 2 @xmath14 column density gas at @xmath15 k less than at @xmath17 k warm @xmath11 column densities about @xmath18 of total co few clouds fraction warm gas high as 77@xmath19 or @xmath20 co emission from warm gas observations high abundances of 10@xmath21 in warm cold gasindirect arguments to shocks photo - dissociation regions as heating mechanism warm gas see rf01 comparison @xmath11 data with pdrs shocks models s(4 s(5 ) lines trace densest gas in gc clouds@xmath22 ) heated in pdrs shocks or both explain large column densities gas at @xmath17 k s(0 s(1 ) lines less dense pdrs or low velocity shocks @xmath25 ) required curvature population diagrams with temperature gradient in pdr composition shocks different velocities difficult to know if @xmath11 emission arises in pdrs or shocked regions spectrometers detected fine structure lines of ions like n 122 33 18 12 in most sources detected 57 88 52 15.6 in sources closer to galactic center lines ions with high excitational potentials must arise in h ii regions otherwise invoke j - shocks with velocities 100 no hint strong shocks from line profiles radial velocities effective temperatures for ionizing radiation of @xmath26 k typical of o7 starobserved h35@xmath27@xmath28 recombination lines in sources with iram-30 m telescope not detected lines in source ( @xcite 2000 ) assuming line widths 100 electron temperature @xmath29 8000 k set conservative upper limit to lyman continuum photons emitted per second by excitation source @xmath30 rate typical of star with spectral type b0 or effective temperature @xmath31 k implies not total ionizing source inconsistency between radio recombination lines fine structure lines disappears if hii regions more extended than 30-m telescope beam ionizing stars surrounded by cavities with sizes @xmath32 pc 2000 ) figure shows dust continuum spectra representative sample sources other spectrum similar wavelength maximum emission varies from @xmath33 to @xmath35 to @xmath36 explain dust emission needs two grey bodies figure displays dust emission of sources with coldest - warmest dust ( m+0.21 - 0.12 ) predictions of model with two grey bodies at different temperaturespredictions used expression @xmath37 @xmath38 planck function opacity @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 visual extinction magnitudes @xmath42 model assumes warmer component extinguished colder @xmath43 lws beam good fits parameters source @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath47 m+0.76 - 0.05 49 1.5 16 10 + 7.5 1 30 1 m+0.21 - 0.12 50 1.5 16 6 + 2.2 1 47 1 explain emission @xmath42 s necessary grey body temperature @xmath48 k visual extinction 3050 mag large fluxes @xmath42 s filling factors @xmath47 @xmath49 needed temperature cold component vary warmer one required temperature varies @xmath12 k m+0.75 - 0.05 m+3.06 + 0.34 m+1.56 - 0.30 to @xmath50 k m+0.21 - 0.12 m+0.35 - 0.06 visual extinction @xmath8 2 - 8 mag 5 - 10 @xmath19 extinction cold dust heating mechanism needed raise dust temperature @xmath48 k to 30 45 kstandard dust - to - gas ratio extinction warm dust equivalent to @xmath11 column density 2 - 8 @xmath51 densities factor 2 lower than warm gas @xmath11 - rotational lines warm gas dust arise in low - density pdrs @xcite external layers gas heated photoelectric without dust high standard model gas temperatures 100200 k first 3 mag visual extinction into cloud dust temperature @xmath52 k fig . 3 values pdr parameters reasonable for gc ism large scale average densities far - continuum pdr models @xmath53 @xmath54 explain @xmath11 excitation temperatures s(0 ) s(1 ) lines large scale emission of @xmath11 @xmath55 s(1 ) line warm dust at gc cold dust emission from gc clouds line of sight @xmath56 mag visual extinction due to material between gc region iso measured column densities warm molecular gas in gc warm @xmath11 represents fraction of @xmath18 of total @xmath11 column densities @xmath6 @xmath5 detected fine structure lines of ions high ionization potential hii regionscomparison fine structure lines with hydrogen recombination lines at mm wavelengths shows extended ionized component high radiation temperature pdr in interface between hii region molecular material heating warm gas dust component temperatures 30 - 45 k shocks in physics chemistry gc ism high abundances of molecules photodissociated like suggest from by shocks iso effect uv radiation on gc ism heating molecular gas not ruled out argument dust temperature lower than gas understand energetics gc ism high spectral spatial resolution hifi instrument study interplay between ionized material warm molecular gas njr - f acknowledges consejera de educacin cultura comunidad madrid for pre - doctoral fellowship work partially supported by spanish cicyt european commission under grant numbers esp-1291-e 1fd1997 - 1442 | 0.443172 | 3,010 | 1,541 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,952 | we present preliminary results for the axial and tensor charge of the nucleon obtained from simulations with @xmath0 clover fermions .
a comparison with chiral perturbation theory is attempted .
lattice qcd offers the possibility to investigate the internal structure of the nucleon without additional model assumptions . in particular , one can study how the mass , the axial charge and further properties of the nucleon change when the quark mass is varied or the nucleon is squeezed into a finite spatial box . even if we could simulate at the physical quark mass and in a huge volume
, we would like to examine the dependence on the quark mass and on the volume , because it contains important information on low - energy qcd .
this information can be extracted by comparing the outcome of lattice qcd simulations with parameterisations provided by chiral effective field theories ( cheft ) .
this comparison with cheft , if successful , leads to two important achievements : firstly , it gives us control over the chiral extrapolation and the thermodynamic limit of the simulation results and secondly it allows us to determine phenomenologically relevant coupling constants in cheft . in the following ,
we shall present preliminary results from simulations with @xmath1 non - perturbatively improved wilson quarks and the standard plaquette action for the gauge fields obtained by the qcdsf and ukqcd @xcite collaborations .
previous quenched qcdsf results can be found in ref .
@xcite and for a review see ref . @xcite . for the time being we do not yet perform an extrapolation to the continuum limit and neglect lattice artefacts .
originally , cheft was invented to describe the quark mass dependence of low - energy quantities by means of effective hadron fields .
however , for sufficiently large volumes and sufficiently small pion masses , finite size effects are dominated by pions `` propagating around the world '' , and therefore cheft can also be used to calculate the volume dependence : the effective lagrangian is independent of the volume .
our paradigm is the analysis of the nucleon mass @xcite , where we could describe the pion mass dependence and the finite size effects up to surprisingly large masses by formulae derived from relativistic baryon chiral perturbation theory .
we are trying to perform a similar analysis also for the axial and the tensor charge of the nucleon , and in the following we shall report on the status of these attempts .
whenever we need numbers in physical units , we shall set the scale using @xmath2 .
compared with the case of the nucleon mass there are several additional difficulties when dealing with such matrix elements of composite operators : * the cheft calculations are not as advanced as for the nucleon mass . * in order to suppress lattice artefacts , the operators should be improved . however , the required improvement coefficients are not yet known non - perturbatively . in the following , we shall present results from the unimproved operators .
* the operators have to be renormalised .
we shall use non - perturbative renormalisation factors computed by means of the rome - southampton method with a linear chiral extrapolation at fixed bare gauge coupling . *
the quark - line disconnected contributions to the matrix elements are hard to evaluate .
therefore we shall consider only flavour - nonsinglet quantities , where these contributions cancel . in order to compute the axial form factor of the nucleon @xmath3 on the lattice we use the flavour - nonsinglet axial vector current @xmath4 and the form factor decomposition of its proton matrix element .
using the so - called small scale expansion , which takes @xmath5 degrees of freedom explicitly into account , the authors of ref .
@xcite have studied the mass dependence of the nucleon axial charge @xmath6 to @xmath7 and compared with quenched data . in fig .
[ fig.ga ] we perform a similar comparison with our presently available dynamical data for @xmath8 choosing some reasonable values for the parameters .
the curve reproduces the weak mass dependence of the simulation results as well as the physical point , at least approximately , but the chiral logarithm dominates only for very small pion masses .
what about the finite size effects for @xmath8 ? there are indications that they could be quite large ( for a quenched study see , e.g. , ref .
@xcite ) , and they might not yet be negligible for the results in fig .
[ fig.ga ] .
we have performed simulations on three different volumes at the same bare gauge coupling and quark mass , leading to @xmath9 on the largest lattice , and found a clear volume dependence .
first calculations within cheft have appeared @xcite . to @xmath10 in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory ( without explicit @xmath5s ) one finds @xmath11 \displaystyle \quad { } - \frac{g_a^0 m_\pi^2}{4 \pi^2 f_\pi^2 } \left ( 1 + { \mbox{\small $ \frac{2}{3}$}}(g_a^0)^2 \right ) \sum_{\vec{n } } { } ^\prime \frac{k_1(l |\vec{n}| m_\pi)}{l |\vec{n}| m_\pi } \ , , \end{array}\ ] ] where @xmath12 is the value of @xmath8 in the chiral limit and @xmath13 is the pion decay constant . in fig . [ fig.gafs ] we plot our data together with the above expression for the finite size effect .
not even the sign is reproduced correctly .
of course , one may blame the large pion mass in connection with the low order of chiral perturbation theory for this discrepancy , and further investigations are clearly needed .
the tensor charge of the nucleon is the lowest moment of the transversity distribution @xmath14 . for flavour @xmath15
it is given by the proton matrix element @xmath16 with @xmath17 .
again , we restrict ourselves to the flavour nonsinglet combination @xmath18 and plot it in fig .
[ fig.combi ] together with @xmath8 data , because in the non - relativistic limit one expects that both quantities agree .
hence this comparison gives us some information on how relativistic the quarks in our simulations are and the data seem to indicate that the quarks are not very relativistic .
concluding we may say that the interpretation of our results is only at its beginning .
once we have analysed our configurations completely , we hope to gain more insight into the structure of the nucleon .
but further improvements are certainly desirable , in particular smaller quark masses and lattice spacings in the monte carlo simulations as well as more extensive calculations in cheft . | the numerical calculations have been performed on the hitachi sr8000 at lrz ( munich ) , on the cray t3e at nic ( jlich ) and zib ( berlin ) , as well as on the ape1000 and quadrics at desy ( zeuthen ) .
we thank all institutions for their support .
this work has been supported in part by the eu integrated infrastructure initiative hadron physics ( i3hp ) and by the dfg ( forschergruppe gitter - hadronen - phnomenologie ) .
a. a k acknowledges support by `` berliner programm zur frderung der chancengleichheit fr frauen in forschung und lehre '' . 9 c.r .
allton et al . , phys .
d65 ( 2002 ) 054502 .
s. capitani et al . , nucl .
79 ( 1999 ) 548 . m. gckeler et al . , nucl .
suppl . 119
( 2003 ) 32 .
a. ali khan et al . , nucl .
b689 ( 2004 ) 175 .
hemmert , m. procura and w. weise , phys .
d68 ( 2003 ) 075009 .
s. sasaki , k. orginos , s. ohta and t. blum , phys .
d68 ( 2003 ) 054509 .
beane and m.j .
savage , hep - ph/0404131 . | numerical calculations performed hitachi sr8000 lrz munich cray t3e nic jlich zib berlin ape1000 quadrics desy zeuthen thank institutions support work supported eu infrastructure initiative hadron physics dfg forschergruppe gitter hadronen phnomenologie support berliner programm chancengleichheit frauen forschung lehre allton al . d65 2002 ) 054502 capitani nucl . 79 ( 1999 ) 548 gckeler nucl suppl. 119 2003 ) 32 ali khan nucl b689 2004 ) 175 hemmert procura weise phys . d68 2003 ) 075009 sasaki orginos ohta blum phys . d68 2003 ) 054509 beane savage hep - ph/0404131 | 0.073817 | 334 | 178 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
197,964 | the medium - induced one - gluon radiation spectrum off a massive quark - antiquark ( @xmath0 ) antenna traversing a colored qcd medium is calculated in this contribution . the gluon spectrum off the antenna computed at first order in the opacity expansion is collinear finite but infrared divergent , which is different from the result obtained from an independent emitter which is both infrared and collinear finite .
the interference between emitters dominates the soft gluon radiation when the antenna opening angle is small and the emitted gluon is soft , whereas the antenna behaves like a superposition of independent emitters when the opening angle is large and the radiated gluon is hard . as a phenomenological consequence
, we investigate the energy lost by the projectiles due to the radiation . in general , the size of the mass effects is similar in both cases . | calculations of radiative energy loss via medium - induced gluon radiation ( see e.g. @xcite and refs . therein ) off massive quarks were performed in @xcite .
two effects compete against each other .
the gluon formation time , @xmath1^{-1}\sim \left[t_g^{\rm form}(m= 0)\right]^{-1}+m_q^2/e_q$ ] , of a massive quark ( with mass @xmath2 and energy @xmath3 ) is shorter than that of a massless quark , so gluon emission in the former is less suppressed by the lpm effect than that in the latter . on the other hand , gluon radiation off a massive quark is suppressed at angles smaller than the so - called dead cone angle @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 , similarly to the case in vacuum @xcite .
the generic result of this competition is that a massive quark loses less energy in a medium than a massless one .
but the mentioned calculations do not consider the effects of the interference between emitters and therefore the extension to multi - gluon radiation relies on ad hoc conjectures . in order to investigate these interference effects in vacuum ,
a quark - antiquark ( @xmath0 ) antenna was considered , see @xcite and references therein .
the soft gluon radiation spectrum off a massless @xmath0 antenna in vacuum exhibits angular ordering ( ao ) : radiation is suppressed at @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 ( after averaging over the gluon azimuthal angle ) , where @xmath7 is the angle between the emitted gluon and the parent quark ( antiquark ) and @xmath9 is the antenna opening angle .
the massless antenna spectrum diverges when @xmath7 @xmath10 @xmath11 and @xmath12 @xmath10 @xmath11 .
when the quarks have a non - zero mass , ao is modified and the collinear divergence disappears due to the dead cone effect , but the soft divergence remains .
the result was shown to hold for arbitrary color representations of the @xmath13 pair .
medium - induced soft gluon radiation off a massless @xmath0 antenna has been studied recently @xcite .
the spectrum exhibits antiangular ordering ( aao ) - there is no collinear divergence ( @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath8 @xmath11 ) - but the soft divergence persists , at variance with the results in @xcite . due to space limitations , here we show some selected results for a massive quark - antiquark pair at first order in opacity .
in fig . [ aspec ] we show the three types of diagrams that we consider .
they correspond to the independent emission off the quark ( antiquark ) , denoted as independent and the interference between the quark and antiquark , denoted as interference i and interference ii , respectively .
the total number of diagrams computed is 96 .
examples of feynman diagrams representing the three contributions to the antenna spectrum .
the cross denotes the position of scattering , the l.h.s . of the dashed line
is the amplitude and the r.h.s . of the dashed line
is the complex conjugate amplitude , with the dashed line being the cut.,scaledwidth=80.0% ] the average radiative energy loss for gluons with energies @xmath14 is @xmath15 dependence of the medium - induced radiative relative energy loss on the antenna opening angle .
the parameters are : debye mass @xmath16 gev and medium length @xmath17 fm for the plots on the left ( right ) .
the solid curves correspond to the massless antenna , the dotted curves to the bottom antenna , the dashed curves to the massless independent spectra and the dash - dotted curves to the bottom independent spectra . from top to bottom , the values used in eq .
( [ deoe ] ) for @xmath18 are 0 , 2 and 6 gev , while those for @xmath19 are 2 , 6 and @xmath3 . ]
the ratio @xmath20 as a function of @xmath9 is shown in fig .
[ hoa ] , where @xmath21 gev for the independent emitter case and for the antenna the spectrum is divided by 2 as it gets contributions from both the quark and antiquark . in the soft and moderate gluon energy regions ( @xmath22 gev and @xmath23 gev @xmath24 gev ) , both the massless and the massive antenna spectra grow monotonously with an increasing opening angle @xmath9 and the former is larger than the latter . in the hard gluon radiation sector ( @xmath25 gev @xmath26 ) ,
the situation is similar for large medium parameters while , for small medium parameters ( lower left plot ) , there is a crossing between the massless and the bottom antennas due to the lpm effect which results in a larger energy loss for larger masses as discussed in the introduction and found previously e.g. in @xcite .
therefore , for large medium parameters the dead cone effect dominates over the lpm in all cases . both massless and massive antenna results approach the ones from independent emitters when @xmath9 is large , showing that the interference between the quark and the antiquark of the antenna reduces with an increasing opening angle .
besides , in the soft gluon emission region and for large medium parameters , there is apparently more energy loss in the antenna than for independent emitters in both the massless and the massive cases .
this reflects the fact that the antenna spectrum exhibits a soft divergence while the independent spectrum is infrared finite . in the moderate and the hard gluon emission sectors , the antenna average energy loss increases and
gradually approaches the independent average energy loss with an increasing antenna opening angle @xmath9 , which indicates that more collimated projectiles lose less energy .
there is no radiation for the antenna when @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 .
the size of the mass effect in the antenna is similar to the one for independent emitters .
in this contribution , we show some results of the medium - induced gluon radiation spectrum off a @xmath0 antenna at first order in opacity for the massive case . in this computation ,
performed in the high - energy limit , both the non - abelian lpm effect and the dead cone for massive quarks ( both contained in the medium - induced gluon spectrum off individual emitting partons - the bdmps - z - w / glv formalism ) , and the interference between emissions off the quark and antiquark , are included .
the antenna radiation is found to be dominated by that off independent emitters for large opening angles of the antenna and for large energies of the emitted gluon .
more collimated antennas lose less energy .
the phase space restriction for gluon emission implied by the dead cone effect is similar in the antenna and in the case of independent emitters .
the effect of the interference between different emitters is to generate predominantly soft radiation at large angles .
10 j. casalderrey - solana and c. a. salgado , acta phys .
b * 38 * , 3731 ( 2007 ) .
n. armesto , c. a. salgado , and u. a. wiedemann , phys .
d * 69 * , 114003 ( 2004 ) .
m. djordjevic and m. gyulassy , nucl .
a * 733 * , 265 ( 2004 ) .
zhang , e. wang , and x .-
wang , phys .
lett . * 93 * , 072301 ( 2004 ) .
y. l. dokshitzer , v. a. khoze , and s. i. troian , j. phys .
g * 17 * , 1481 ( 1991 ) .
l. dokshitzer and d. e. kharzeev , phys .
b * 519 * , 199 ( 2001 ) .
l. dokshitzer , v. a. khoze , a. h. mueller , and s. i. troyan , _
`` basics of perturbative qcd '' , gif - sur - yvette , france , ed .
frontires 1991_. y. mehtar - tani , c. a. salgado , and k. tywoniuk , phys .
lett . * 106 * , 122002 ( 2011 ) .
y. mehtar - tani , c. a. salgado , and k. tywoniuk , arxiv:1102.4317v1 [ hep - ph ] .
y. mehtar - tani and k. tywoniuk , arxiv:1105.1346v1 [ hep - ph ] .
j. casalderrey - solana and e. iancu , arxiv:1105.1760v2 [ hep - ph ] . | calculations of radiative energy loss via medium - induced gluon radiation @xcite off massive quarks performed in two effects compete gluon formation time of massive quark shorter than massless quark gluon emission less suppressed by lpm effect gluon radiation off massive quark suppressed at angles smaller than dead cone angle massive quark loses less energy in medium than massless calculations consider interference between emitters extension to multi - gluon radiation relies on ad hoc conjectures interference effects in vacuum quark - antiquark @xmath0 ) antenna considered soft gluon radiation spectrum off massless @xmath0 antenna in vacuum exhibits angular ordering radiation suppressed at @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 after averaging over gluon azimuthal angle @xmath7 angle between emitted gluon parent quark antenna opening angle massless antenna spectrum diverges when @xmath7 @xmath10 @xmath12quarks have non - zero mass ao modified collinear divergence disappears dead cone effect soft divergence remains result for arbitrary color representations @xmath13 pair medium - induced soft gluon radiation off massless @xmath0 antenna studied @xcite spectrum antiangular ordering no collinear divergence soft divergence persists variance with results @xcite space limitations selected results for massive quark - antiquark pair at first order in opacity fig . three types of diagrams independent emission off quark interference between antiquark i ii total number diagrams 96 feynman diagrams three contributions to antenna spectrum cross position of scattering amplitude complex conjugate amplitude dashed line average radiative energy loss for gluons with energies @xmath14 @xmath15 medium - induced radiative energy loss on antenna opening angle parameters are debye mass @xmath16 gev medium length @xmath17 fm plots solid curves massless antenna dotted curves bottom antenna dashed curves massless independent spectra - dotted curves bottom independent spectrato values in @xmath18 0 2 6 gev @xmath19 2 6 @xmath3 ratio @xmath20 function @xmath9 shown in fig . @xmath21 gev independent emitter antenna spectrum divided by 2 contributions from quark antiquark soft moderate gluon energy regions @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 massless massive antenna spectra grow with increasing opening angle @xmath9 former larger hard gluon radiation sector @xmath25 @xmath26 similar for large medium parameters small medium parameters crossing between massless bottom antennas due to lpm effect larger energy loss for masses large medium parameters dead cone effect dominates over lpm massless massive antenna results approach independent emitters when @xmath9 large interference between quark antiquark reduces with increasing opening angle soft gluon emission region large medium parameters more energy loss in antenna independent emitters antenna spectrum soft divergence independent spectrum infrared finite moderate hard gluon emission sectors antenna average energy loss increases approaches independent average with increasing antenna opening angle @xmath9 more collimated projectiles lose less energyno radiation antenna when @xmath9 mass effect similar independent emitters contribution results medium - induced gluon radiation spectrum off @xmath0 antenna first order opacity massive case computation high - energy limit non - abelian lpm effect dead cone massive quarks interference between emissions quark antiquark included antenna radiation dominated independent emitters large opening angles large energies emitted gluon collimated antennas lose less energy phase space restriction gluon emission dead cone effect similar antenna independent emitters interference between emitters soft radiation at large angles. casalderrey - solana c a. salgado phys . * 38 *, 3731 ( 2007 ) armesto salgado. wiedemann phys . * 69 * 114003 ( 2004 ) m. djordjevic m. gyulassy 733 *, 265 ( 2004 ) zhang e. wang x.- wang phys . 93 * 072301 ( 2004 ). dokshitzer v. khoze. troian 17 * 1481 ( 1991 ) dokshitzer. kharzeev phys .519 199 2001 dokshitzer khoze mueller troyan basics perturbative qcd gif - sur - yvette france frontires 1991 mehtar - tani salgado k tywoniuk 106 122002 2011 ) mehtar - tani salgado tywoniuk arxiv:1102.4317v1 hep ph mehtar - tani tywoniuk arxiv:1105.1346v1 hep ph casalderrey - solana iancu arxiv:1105.1760v2 hep - ph | 0.31491 | 1,935 | 950 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,977 | motion correction is the first in a pipeline of algorithms to analyze calcium imaging videos and extract biologically relevant information , for example the network structure of the neurons therein .
fast motion correction would be especially critical for closed - loop activity triggered stimulation experiments , where accurate detection and targeting of specific cells in necessary .
our algorithm uses a fourier - transform approach , and its efficiency derives from a combination of judicious downsampling and the accelerated computation of many @xmath0 norms using dynamic programming and two - dimensional , fft - accelerated convolutions .
its accuracy is comparable to that of established community - used algorithms , and it is more stable to large translational motions .
it is programmed in java and is compatible with imagej . | calcium imaging , first used to measure the activity of neurons in the early 1990s @xcite , has been successfully applied throughout the nervous system .
it allows us to see the behavior of neurons in awake behaving mice , using either chemical or genetic calcium indicators , with confocal microscopy , two - photon microscopy , or wearable imaging devices @xcite . as a result , it is an increasingly useful tool for identifying the neural substrate of mouse behaviors . however , calcium imaging videos have difficult noise properties , including white noise and motion artifacts which must be corrected in a preprocessing step before proper analysis can be undertaken .
motion correction is the first step in the analysis of calcium images .
after they are motion - corrected , rois are identified , and time - activity graphs are made from each roi . if the motion - correction is low - quality , then the time - activity graphs suffer , and the reconstructed networks may have errors . for real time
closed loop operation , if the motion correction is slow , it can not be done while the mouse is in the microscope , and the experiment fails .
turboreg @xcite is a commonly used algorithm to do motion correction .
it uses a downsampling strategy , which is prerequisite for speed , and it uses a template image , which is necessary for accuracy .
we have developed a similar method , called _ moco _ ( motion corrector ) , which adopted both strategies , since correcting one image against the next in the stack results in unacceptable roundoff errors .
other approaches use hmms @xcite , @xcite or other techniques @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite .
@xcite is the only one similar mathematically to , and may be slightly faster than , moco , but it has accuracy problems ( see figure 2 ) .
moco uses downsampling and a template image , and it can be called from imagej .
however , it is faster than turboreg @xcite at translation - based motion correction because it uses dynamic programming and two - dimensional fft - acceleration of two - dimensional convolutions .
@xcite also uses the fft approach but uses a different objective function that does not require dynamic programming ; we believe that our approach is more robust to corrupted data , see figure 2 .
image stabilizer is as fast for small images , but is very slow for standard - size images .
running on our own datasets , moco appears faster than all approaches compatible with imagej .
moco corrects every image in the video by comparing every possible translation of it with the template image , and chooses the one which minimizes the @xmath0 norm of the difference between the images in the overlapping region , @xmath1 , divided by the area of @xmath1 . the fact that it is
so thorough makes it robust to long translations in the data .
more complicated non - translation image warps are usually unnecessary for fixing calcium images , which suffer from spurious translations , which moco corrects , and spurious motion in the z - direction , which is very hard to correct .
our approach also uses cache - aware upsampling : when an image is aligned with the template in the downsampled space , it must be jittered when it is upsampled to see which jitter best aligns with the upsampled template .
we do this in such a way that data that is used recently is reused immediately , making the implementation faster . hence , moco is an efficient motion correction of calcium images , and is likely to become a useful tool for processing calcium imaging movies .
let @xmath2 , for @xmath3 and @xmath4 be an image in the stack .
we assume @xmath5 is downsampled if it is larger than @xmath6 .
let @xmath7 be the template image against which to align @xmath5 .
we want to pick @xmath8 such that @xmath9 , where @xmath10 is input by the user , and @xmath11 is minimal , where @xmath12 is the set of ordered pairs of integers @xmath13 such that @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 , and @xmath17 .
if we do this for every image @xmath5 in the stack , we have then motion corrected the video , and we are done , up to a short upsampling step . to upsample , multiply the optimal @xmath8 by @xmath18 and do a local search to minimize @xmath19 on the finer grid .
now , @xmath20 the first two sums can be computed via dynamic programming .
let s consider @xmath5 when @xmath21 and @xmath22 are negative .
let @xmath23 we have that @xmath24 hence , the first two sums can be computed for all @xmath8 in @xmath25 time , which is unaffected by a constant amount of downsampling .
it suffices to compute for all @xmath8 such that @xmath9 , @xmath26 let @xmath27 be @xmath28 rotated @xmath29 degrees . using matlab notation , let @xmath30;{\rm zeros(w , n+w)}]),\ ] ]
@xmath31;{\rm zeros(w , n+w)}]).\ ] ] commas denote horizontal concatenation , semicolons denote vertical concatenation , and @xmath32 is an @xmath33 matrix of zeros . for equally sized matrices
@xmath34 , @xmath35 , let @xmath36 mean @xmath37 .
then @xmath38 is a rearrangement of @xmath39 .
since @xmath40 s are fast , that means @xmath39 can be computed for all @xmath8 in @xmath41 time .
hence , after upsampling , the entire video can be aligned in @xmath42 time , where @xmath43 is the number of slides in the video .
after @xmath8 are chosen to minimize @xmath19 , they are multiplied by two multiple times to upsample .
every time they are multiplied by @xmath18 , @xmath44 are computed for @xmath45 to see which @xmath46 and @xmath47 are minimal .
these nine evaluations of @xmath48 are done with a cache - aware algorithm for speed .
we compare moco in speed to turboreg @xcite on its translation mode , using both the `` fast '' and `` accurate '' settings .
we also compare it to image stabilizer using its default settings @xcite ( it can be made faster by changing the settings but the accuracy is poor ) .
we use several real calcium imaging videos , which we say are @xmath49 if they contain @xmath43 slides of size @xmath50 .
if the images are larger than @xmath6 , we downsample once , otherwise , we do not downsample .
we have found that dowsampling @xmath51 and @xmath52 times causes severe errors so we avoid those settings .
in addition , we have compared moco to turboreg on synthetic images with severe translational motion artifacts and have found that moco is slightly more accurate .
all times are in seconds .
the template used for every video is the first image in the video for both moco and turboreg .
moco uses a maximum translation width of @xmath53 in both the @xmath54 and @xmath55 directions .
.2 in [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
the first author would like to thank julia sable for her help , and inbal ayzenshtat , jesse jackson , jae - eun miller , luis reid , weijian yang , and weiqun fang for their datasets .
the first author would also like to thank the columbia university data science institute for their ongoing support .
this research is supported by the nei ( dp1ey024503 , r01ey011787 ) , nihm ( r01mh101218 , r41mh100895 ) and darpa contract w91nf-14 - 1 - 0269 .
this material is based upon work supported by , or in part by , the u. s. army research laboratory and the u. s. army research office under contract number w911nf-12 - 1 - 0594 ( muri ) .
david s. greenberg , jason n.d .
kerr , `` automated correction of fast motion artifacts for two - photon imaging of awake animals , '' _ journal of neuroscience methods _ , volume 176 , issue 1 , 15 january 2009 , pages 115 .
patrick kaifosh , jeffrey d. zaremba , nathan b. danielson , and attila losonczy , `` sima : python software for analysis of dynamic fluorescence imaging data , '' front neuroinform .
2014 ; 8 : 80 . published online 2014 sep 23 | calcium imaging first used activity neurons early 1990s applied throughout nervous system allows behavior neurons in awake mice using chemical or genetic calcium indicators with confocal microscopy two - photon microscopy wearable imaging devices increasingly useful tool for identifying neural substrate mouse behaviors calcium imaging videos have difficult noise properties white noise motion artifacts must corrected preprocessing before analysis motion correction first step in analysis calcium images rois identified time - activity graphs made if motion - correction low - quality time graphs suffer reconstructed networks have errors for real time operation if motion correction slow done mouse microscope experiment fails turboreg @xcite used algorithm motion correction uses downsampling strategy for speed template image necessary for accuracy developed similar method _ moco _ ( motion corrector both strategies roundoff errors other approaches use @xcite @xcite or other techniques @xcite similar mathematically to slightly faster than moco has accuracy problems figure 2 moco uses downsampling template image called from imagej faster than turboreg @xcite at translation - based motion correction uses dynamic programming two - dimensional fft - acceleration of convolutions @xcite uses fft approach different objective function dynamic programming our approach more robust to corrupted data figure 2 image stabilizer fast for small images slow for standard - size images on datasets moco faster than approaches compatible with imagej corrects every image translation with template chooses minimizes norm difference between images overlapping region robust to long translations complicated non - translation image warps unnecessary for fixing calcium images spurious translations moco corrects spurious motion in z - direction hard approach uses cache - aware upsampling image with jittered upsampled data used recently reused immediately implementation faster moco efficient motion correction of calcium images useful tool for processing calcium imaging movies let @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 be image in stack assume @xmath5 downsampled if larger than @xmath6 let @xmath7 be template image against to align @xmath5pick @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 input user @xmath11 minimal @xmath12 ordered pairs integers @xmath13 @xmath14 every image @xmath5 motion corrected video done short upsampling step multiply optimal @xmath8 by @xmath18 local search minimize @xmath19 finer grid @xmath20 first two sums computed dynamic programming consider @xmath5 negative @xmath23 @xmath24 first two sums computed all @xmath8 @xmath25 time unaffected constant downsampling compute @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 rotated @xmath29 degrees matlab notation @xmath30 zeros(w n+w) @xmath31 zeros(w n+w commas horizontal concatenation semicolons vertical concatenation @xmath32 @xmath33 matrix zeros equally sized matrices @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 rearrangement @xmath39 @xmath40 s fast @xmath39 computed all @xmath8 in @xmath41 timeafter upsampling video aligned in @xmath42 time @xmath43 number of slides after @xmath8 minimize @xmath19 multiplied by two to upsample multiplied by @xmath44 computed for @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 minimal nine evaluations of @xmath48 with cache - aware algorithm for speed moco to turboreg @xcite translation mode fast accurate settings to image stabilizer default settings @xcite accuracy poor use real calcium imaging videos @xmath49 if @xmath43 slides @xmath50 if images larger than @xmath6 downsample once downsample dowsampling @xmath51 @xmath52 causes errors avoid compared moco to turboreg on synthetic images with severe translational motion artifacts moco more accurate times in seconds template for first image for moco turboreg moco uses maximum translation width of @xmath53 in @xmath54 and @xmath55 directions julia sable inbal ayzenshtat jesse jackson jae - eun miller luis reid weijian yang weiqun fang datasetsfirst author columbia university data science institute support research supported nei nihm darpa contract w91nf-14 - 1 - 0269 based u. s. army research laboratory army research office contract w911nf-12 - 1 - 0594 david greenberg jason kerr automated correction fast motion artifacts two - photon imaging awake animals journal neuroscience methods volume 176 issue 1 2009 pages 115 patrick kaifosh jeffrey zaremba nathan danielson attila losonczy python software analysis dynamic fluorescence imaging neuroinform 2014 8 : 80 2014 23 | 0.315691 | 1,913 | 977 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,978 | we report an analysis of the anderson transition in an su(2 ) model with chiral symmetry .
clear single parameter scaling behaviour is observed .
we estimate the critical exponent for the divergence of the localization length to be @xmath0 indicating that the transition belongs to the symplectic universality class . ,
, anderson transition ; spin - orbit coupling ; chiral symmetry | it is thought that the critical phenomena of the anderson transition may be classified according to three universality classes ( orthogonal , unitary and symplectic ) depending on the symmetries of the hamiltonian , i.e. time reversal and spin rotation symmetries .
a different value of the critical exponent @xmath1 describing the divergence of the localization length is expected to characterize each universality class . in the absence of any diagonal disorder the su(2 )
model hamiltonian may have chiral symmetry .
this depends on the boundary conditions and the number of sites in each direction . near the band center chiral symmetry
affects the localization of electrons , e.g. , an even - odd system size dependence of the quasi-1d localization length is observed @xcite . here
we investigate whether or not chiral symmetry also affects the critical exponent @xmath1 .
a system belongs to the symplectic universality class if its hamiltonian commutes with a time reversal operator @xmath2 that satisfies @xmath3 , e.g. , systems with significant spin - orbit coupling . systems in this universality class exhibit an anderson transition even in 2d .
recently we analysed the su(2 ) model with an on - site random potential ( diagonal disorder ) , which breaks chiral symmetry , and estimated the critical exponent @xmath4 @xcite . here
we study the su(2 ) model without an on - site random potential . in spite of the fact that there is no random potential
, we find that there is an anderson transition at a critical energy @xmath5 .
further this energy @xmath5 is far from the the band center and chiral symmetry does not affect the observed critical phenomena .
the hamiltonian of the su(2 ) model describes non - interacting electrons on a simple square lattice with nearest neighbour su(2 ) random hopping @xmath6 where @xmath7(@xmath8 ) denotes the creation ( annihilation ) operator of an electron at the site @xmath9 with spin @xmath10 .
we distribute hopping matrices randomly and independently with uniform probability on the group su(2 ) .
this corresponds to @xmath11 and @xmath12 uniformly distributed in the range @xmath13 , and @xmath14 distributed in the range @xmath15 $ ] according to the probability density , @xmath16 .
we calculate the localization length @xmath17 on a quasi-1d strip whose width is @xmath18 with the transfer matrix method @xcite and analyse the dependence of the re - normalized localization length @xmath19 on the energy and the width of the strip @xcite .
we also calculate the density of states with the green s function iteration method @xcite .
in the course of our calculations we noticed a technical problem with the method described in @xcite . when fitting the numerical data it is important to have not only an estimate of the localization length @xmath17 but also an estimate @xmath20 of how accurately @xmath17 has been estimated .
otherwise a reliable fitting of the data is not possible .
we have found that the error @xmath20 is over estimated by the method of @xcite . to overcome this problem we divide the quasi-1d strip into blocks whose lengths are @xmath21 and calculate the quasi-1d localization length @xmath22(@xmath9 denotes the block ) in each block and accumulate @xmath22 . from the distribution of @xmath23
we estimate @xmath17 and @xmath20 . vs fermi energy @xmath24 for system sizes
the solid lines are the fit . ]
we calculated @xmath26 as a function of fermi energy for systems with widths @xmath27 and @xmath28 .
the accuracy of the localization length data is @xmath29 , with the exceptions of @xmath30 where the accuracy is @xmath31 . to achieve this accuracy systems of length of the order of @xmath32 to @xmath33
are required .
we impose the periodic boundary conditions in the transverse direction . for this choice of boundary condition systems with
even @xmath18 have chiral symmetry , while those with odd @xmath18 do not .
we fit even and odd data separately first and then in combination .
the results are displayed in table [ table : result ] .
the estimates of the critical parameters for all three fits are in close coincidence and we conclude that chiral symmetry does not change the universality class . in fig .
[ fig : su2w0cp ] we show the result for the combined even and odd data .
the lines cross at single point , indicating both that corrections to scaling due to irrelevant variables are negligible and also that an even - odd effect does not exist .
the estimates @xmath1 and @xmath34 are consistent with those in @xcite for the symplectic universality class .
the density of states for a system of the size @xmath35 averaged over @xmath21 ensembles is shown in fig.[fig : su2w0dos ] . in the critical region , the density of states changes slowly .
this behaviour is different from that of the random magnetic flux u(1 ) model in 3d where the density of states changes rapidly in the critical region @xcite .
this might be the reason why we obtain clearer single parameter scaling here than in a study of the critical phenomena of the u(1 ) model @xcite . .
the number of data @xmath36 and goodness of fit @xmath37 .
the best fit estimates of the critical energy @xmath5 , @xmath38 and the critical exponent @xmath1 with @xmath39 confidence intervals .
there are 7 fitting parameters . [ cols="<,<,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] | critical phenomena anderson transition classified three universality classes orthogonal unitary symplectic depending hamiltonian time reversal spin rotation different value critical exponent @xmath1 localization length each universality class diagonal disorder su(2 ) model hamiltonian chiral symmetry depends boundary conditions number sites direction near band center chiral symmetry affects localization electrons system size dependence quasi-1d localization length observed @xcite chiral symmetry affects critical exponent @xmath1 system belongs symplectic universality class if hamiltonian commutes time reversal operator @xmath2 @xmath3 coupling systems exhibit anderson transition even in 2d analysed su(2 ) model with on - site random potential diagonal disorder chiral symmetry estimated critical exponent @xmath4 @xcite model without random potential anderson transition at critical energy @xmath5 far from band center chiral symmetry affect critical phenomena hamiltonian su(2 ) model describes non - interacting electrons square lattice random hopping @xmath6 @xmath7( denotes creation operator electron at site @xmath9 with spin @xmath10distribute hopping matrices randomly independently uniform probability group su(2 ) corresponds @xmath11 @xmath12 distributed range @xmath13 @xmath14 range @xmath15 probability density calculate localization length @xmath17 quasi-1d strip width @xmath18 transfer matrix method @xcite analyse dependence re - normalized localization length @xmath19 energy width strip calculate density states green s function iteration method @xcite technical problem method fitting data important estimate localization length @xmath17 estimate @xmath20 reliable fitting error @xmath20 over estimated @xcite divide quasi-1d strip blocks lengths @xmath21 calculate localization length @xmath22(@xmath9 block each block accumulate @xmath22 distribution @xmath23 estimate @xmath17 @xmath20 fermi energy @xmath24 system sizes solid lines fit calculated @xmath26 function fermi energy systems widths @xmath27 @xmath28 accuracy localization length data @xmath29 exceptions @xmath30 accuracy @xmath31 achieve accuracy systems length @xmath32 to @xmath33 required impose periodic boundary conditions transverse directionboundary condition systems with even @xmath18 have chiral symmetry odd @xmath18 not fit even odd data separately combination results displayed in table estimates critical parameters for three fits chiral symmetry change universality class fig . result combined even odd data lines cross at single point corrections to scaling due to irrelevant variables negligible even - odd effect estimates @xmath1 @xmath34 consistent with @xcite for symplectic universality class density of states for system size @xmath35 averaged over @xmath21 ensembles shown in fig critical region density changes slowly different from random magnetic flux u(1 ) model 3d density changes rapidly clearer single parameter scaling than model number of data @xmath36 goodness of fit @xmath37 best fit estimates of critical energy @xmath5 @xmath38 critical exponent @xmath1 with @xmath39 confidence intervals 7 fitting parameters | 0.187956 | 1,235 | 631 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
197,984 | the motion of a massive test particle in a schwarzschild spacetime surrounded by a perfect fluid with equation of state @xmath0 is investigated .
deviations from geodesic motion are analyzed as a function of the parameter @xmath1 , ranging from @xmath2 which corresponds to the case of massive free scalar fields , down into the so - called phantom " energy , with @xmath3 .
it is found that the interaction with the fluid distribution leads to capture ( escape ) of the particle trajectory in the case @xmath4 ( @xmath5 ) , respectively .
based on this result , it is argued that inspection of the trajectories of test particles in the vicinity of a schwarzschild black hole may offer a new means of gaining insights into the nature of cosmic matter . | material bodies moving within a surrounding fluid are typically subject to a force associated with the fluid - body interaction .
for instance , in the case of a photon gas this force acts like a friction contrasting the particle motion , as first considered by poynting @xcite and robertson @xcite .
the force term entering the equations of motion was given there by the 4-momentum density of radiation observed in the particle s rest frame with a multiplicative constant factor expressing the strength of the interaction itself .
in the present paper we follow the same approach to investigate the general features of particle motion in a schwarzschild spacetime region filled with a fluid with equation of state @xmath6 .
the parameter @xmath1 characterizes different kind of fluids , from massive free scalar fields ( @xmath2 ) , to non - relativistic dust ( @xmath7 ) , all the way down deep into the so - called phantom " energy ( @xmath3 ) .
as it is well known from mathematical cosmology @xcite , the parameter @xmath1 has a profound influence on the time evolution of the universe .
for instance , in the friedmann - robertson - walker ( frw ) models it determines the power law exponent of the scale factor as a function of time .
according to our analysis , which relies on an explicit form of the fluid - particle interaction , the parameter @xmath1 plays a major role also in discriminating among different types ( escape versus capture ) of particle motion , for a given black hole spacetime metric . in particular , it is shown that the condition @xmath8 ( the case of a cosmological constant ) identifies with geodesic motion in the schwarzschild metric , and sets the borderline between capture ( positive sign ) and escape ( negative sign ) , respectively .
this sharp borderline could in principle lead to measurable effects , hence new hints on the nature of the cosmological matter , based on the observation of the motion of test particles embedded in the cosmological fluid surrounding a schwarzschild black hole .
we begin by writing the schwarzschild metric in the standard form [ sch ] ds^2=-n^2dt^2+n^-2dr^2+r^2(d^2+^2d^2 ) , with the lapse function `` @xmath9 given by n= , where @xmath10 is the mass of the black hole .
the metric ( [ sch ] ) is static , i.e. , @xmath11 is a hypersurface - forming timelike killing vector .
observers at rest with respect to the coordinates ( or static observers '' ) have their @xmath12-velocity vector aligned along the killing direction itself , namely u = n^-1_t . an orthonormal frame @xmath13 ( @xmath14 ) adapted to them
is given by @xmath15 for later use , let us introduce co - rotating @xmath16 and counter - rotating @xmath17 circular timelike geodesic orbits on the equatorial plane @xmath18 , characterized by the keplerian " @xmath12-velocity u_k=_k ( u_k e_)=_k ( _ t _ k _ ) , where @xmath19 and @xmath20 , with [ kepler ] _
k=,_k=. these orbits only exist for @xmath21 .
next , let us consider a ( test ) perfect fluid , superposed to the schwarzschild spacetime , described by the following stress - energy tensor @xcite [ tensorefotoni2 ] t^(r)= _ 0(r ) , i.e. , with equation of state @xmath22 , where @xmath1 is a constant characterizing the type of cosmic fluid , as detailed below .
the form of @xmath23 is obtained by integrating the equations @xmath24 ; in this case , due to spherical symmetry of the background , the solution of these equations is easily obtained , i.e. , _ 0(r)= _
0^ n^- , where @xmath25 is a constant representing the value of the energy density at infinity . noted values of @xmath1 in the literature ( see , e.g. , refs .
@xcite ) are as follows : * @xmath2 : massive free scalar field ; * @xmath26 : radiation ; * @xmath7 : dust ( non - relativistic matter ) ; * @xmath27 : quintessence ; * @xmath28 : cosmological constant ; * @xmath3 : phantom energy .
as is well known , each of these values corresponds to a different growth of the cosmological scale factor in the simple frw model , that is @xmath29 .
this shows that the capture scenario , i.e. , @xmath4 , corresponds to initial time singularities ( big - bang ) , whereas the escape scenario , i.e. , @xmath30 , associates with finite - time future singularities ( big - rip ) ( see ref . @xcite and references therein ) .
based on the energy momentum tensor ( [ tensorefotoni2 ] ) , we model the force acting on a massive particle with @xmath12-velocity @xmath31 , in the form of a linear drag term , proportional to the particle velocity [ frad_gen ] f_(scat)(u)_=- p(u ) _
t^_u^ , where [ udef ] u=(u+^a e_a),=(1-_ab^a^b)^-1/2 , @xmath32 projects orthogonally to @xmath33 and @xmath34 is a numerical coefficient .
this expression for the scattering force has been already used in the literature to study radiation scattering @xcite . in that case , @xmath35 models the absorption and consequent re - emission of radiation by the particle . here , we extend its form in such a way as to cover more general situations . the entire discussion about deviations from geodesic motion given below relies on this choice of the force .
although by no means unique , the definition ( [ frad_gen ] ) has the merit of mathematical simplicity , as combined with a clear physical basis . the motion of a massive particle is thus governed by the equations [ eq_mot_gen ] m a(u)=f_(scat)(u ) , where @xmath36 denotes the particle @xmath12-acceleration with frame components @xmath37\,,\nonumber \\ a(u)^{\hat \phi}&= & \frac{d ( \gamma \nu^{\hat \phi})}{d\tau}+\frac{\gamma^2}{r\sin\theta}[n\sin \theta
\nu^{\hat r}+\cos \theta \nu^{\hat \theta}]\nu^{\hat \phi}\,.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the quantities @xmath38 and @xmath39 have been introduced in eq .
( [ kepler ] ) . from the orthogonality condition @xmath40 , the following relation holds [ formula_acc ] a(u)^t=_r a(u)^r+
a(u)^. in the sequel , we shall focus on the special case of a particle confined to the equatorial plane ( @xmath18 ) , namely with @xmath41 . in this case ,
@xmath42 and the remaining components simplify to @xmath43 the general equatorial motion is thus fully described by the following equations @xmath44\,,\nonumber \\
\frac{d \nu^{\hat \phi}}{d\tau } & = & \frac{1}{\gamma}\left(\frac{a(u)_{\hat \phi}}{\gamma_\phi^2}- a(u)_{\hat r}\nu^{\hat r}\nu^{\hat \phi}\right ) -\frac{\gamma n}{\gamma_k^2 r}\nu^{\hat r}\nu^{\hat \phi}\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath45 and @xmath46 , once the acceleration components are replaced by the force components according to @xmath47 the evolution equations for the radial and azimuthal coordinates follow directly from the definition of @xmath33 ( see eq .
( [ udef ] ) ) , i.e. , @xmath48 we note that when @xmath28 , the force term @xmath49 vanishes identically , implying geodesic motion . therefore ,
if the superposed fluid corresponds to a cosmological constant term in the einstein s equations , the interaction between particles and gas can not be modeled by eq .
( [ frad_gen ] ) .
this is exactly the case of the de sitter spacetime .
in fact , for @xmath50 , @xmath51 being the cosmological constant , we have t_u^=-u _ , which vanishes upon projecting orthogonally to @xmath33 . in this case
, a more elaborate force term should be used .
let us further note that at @xmath28 there is a sign change in the force , yielding an outward push as @xmath3 .
this sign change holds the key to the transition from capture to escape scenarios . moving to a polar representation of the velocity ,
i.e. , @xmath52 and @xmath53 , the above equations take the following form @xmath54 where the interaction parameter a= _ 0^ , has been introduced so that @xmath55 identifies the equatorial geodesic case .
note that the presence of @xmath56 affects only the first equation of ( [ poleqs ] ) .
apart from very special situations , the analysis of these equations can only be performed numerically . figs .
[ fig.1 ] and [ fig.2 ] show typical orbits for the same choice of initial conditions , but different values of the interaction strength parameter @xmath56 , at different values of the parameter @xmath1 .
simple inspection shows that values of @xmath57 ( @xmath3 ) imply capture ( escape ) from the hole , as already stated . in fig .
[ fig.1 ] , escaping orbits are characterized by a monotonically increasing speed , up to the speed of light .
this does not occur in fig .
[ fig.2 ] , due to the very small value of the coupling parameter @xmath56 . in both cases , however , the deviations from geodesic motion are clearly appreciated . .
the solid lines starting at @xmath58 ( with @xmath59 , @xmath60 , @xmath61 ) represent the particle motion associated with the scattering of the fluid , with parameters @xmath62 and @xmath63 $ ] .
the short - dashed curve corresponds to @xmath28 , hence to geodesic motion . with this choice of @xmath56 ,
all particles scattered by a fluid with @xmath64 fall into the hole .
negative values of @xmath65 , instead , allow particles to escape capture , and imply a sudden increase of the speed , which reaches the speed of light , i.e. , @xmath66 , in a finite time ( in order to preserve the causality condition for the particle world line , the numerical integration has been stopped at @xmath66 ) . ] , but with @xmath67 and @xmath68 $ ] . with this choice of @xmath56 ( denoting a weaker interaction with respect to the previous case ) , escaping particles ( @xmath3 ) never reach the speed of light . ] in principle , it is interesting to consider multi - component fluid scenarios , in which the matter around the hole corresponds to regions of different fluids ( with different @xmath1 ) , superposed to the schwarzschild background .
this is only an approximation , since the various ( ideal ) fluids in the different regions would rapidly mix and yield a mixture with intermediate values of @xmath1 .
however , if only as a hypothetical speculation , it is of interest to explore the way the equation for @xmath69 ( and only that ) slightly modifies to account for the presence of multi - component matter , say with @xmath70 components , associated with the parameters @xmath71 and @xmath72 . the new evolution equation for @xmath69 is thus given by @xmath73 explicitly , for @xmath74 we have , for example , @xmath75 this is equivalent to a heterogeneous mixture with a radially - dependent @xmath1 parameter , namely w(r)= , where we have set @xmath76 .
one may then consider the presence of both ordinary or exotic matter , with special choices of @xmath77 and @xmath78 .
numerical integration of the orbits in this case , confirms the previous analysis , namely that the dominating value of @xmath1 determines the final fate , capture or escape , of the particle trajectory .
a more in depth analysis of the multi - component fluid scenario will make the object of future investigations .
the motion of massive test particles interacting with a perfect fluid superposed to a schwarzschild black hole is investigated .
the equation of state describing the fluid is taken as @xmath79 , which corresponds to different physical scenarios for different walues of @xmath1 , from ordinary matter to exotic matter .
the interaction with the fluid distribution is modeled by a force term entering the equations of motion given by the 4-momentum density observed in the particle s rest frame with a multiplicative constant factor expressing the strength of the interaction itself .
deviations from geodesic motion are analyzed for different values of the scattering parameter as well as of the parameter @xmath1 .
the latter turns out to be crucial in distinguishing among capture ( @xmath64 ) or escape ( @xmath80 ) from the black hole .
the measurement of such effects may offer a new means of gleaning information on the nature of the cosmic matter surrounding astrophysical objects .
d. bini , a. geralico , r.t .
jantzen , o. semerk , l. stella , the general relativistic poynting - robertson effect : ii . a photon flux with nonzero angular momentum
quantum gravity * 28 * , 035008 ( 2011 ) | bodies moving within fluid subject to force associated fluid - body interaction in photon gas force acts like friction contrasting particle motion considered by poynting and robertson force term equations motion given by 4-momentum density of radiation in particle s rest frame with multiplicative constant factor expressing strength of interaction present paper features of particle motion in schwarzschild spacetime region filled with fluid with equation of state @xmath6 parameter @xmath1 characterizes fluids from massive free scalar fields to non - relativistic dust phantom " energy ( parameter @xmath1 on time evolution universe determines power law exponent of scale factor as function of time parameter @xmath1 among different types escape versus capture of particle motion for black hole spacetime metric condition @xmath8 cosmological constant ) identifies with geodesic motion in schwarzschild metric sets borderline between capture and escape sharp borderline could lead to measurable effects new hints on nature of cosmological matter based on observation of motion of test particles in cosmological fluid surrounding schwarzschild black holewriting schwarzschild metric standard form sch ds^2=-n^2dt^2+n^-2dr^2+r^2(d^2+^2d^2 lapse function @xmath9 n= @xmath10 mass black hole static @xmath11 hypersurface - forming timelike killing vector observers @xmath12-velocity vector aligned killing direction u = n^-1_t orthonormal frame @xmath13 @xmath14 given @xmath15 introduce co - rotating @xmath16 counter - rotating @xmath17 circular geodesic orbits equatorial plane @xmath18 keplerian @xmath12-velocity u_k=_k e)=_k t ) @xmath19 @xmath20 k=,_k= orbits exist @xmath21 consider perfect fluid superposed schwarzschild spacetime described stress - energy tensor @xcite [ tensorefotoni2 ] t^(r)= _ 0(r ) equation state @xmath22 @xmath1 constant cosmic fluid form @xmath23 obtained integrating equations @xmath24 spherical symmetry background solution equations obtained0(r)= _ 0^ n^- @xmath25 constant energy density at infinity values @xmath1 @xmath2 : massive free scalar field @xmath26 : radiation @xmath7 : dust non - relativistic matter @xmath27 : quintessence @xmath28 : cosmological constant @xmath3 : energy values to different growth cosmological scale factor frw model @xmath29 capture scenario @xmath4 corresponds to initial time singularities - escape scenario @xmath30 finite - time future singularities ( big - ) energy momentum tensor model force on massive particle with @xmath12-velocity @xmath31 linear drag term proportional to particle velocity ] f_(scat)(u)_=- p(u ) _ t^_u^ ] u=(u+^a e_a),=(1-_ab^a^b)^-1/2 @xmath32 to @xmath33 @xmath34 numerical coefficient scattering force used radiation scattering @xcite @xmath35 models absorption re - emission of radiation by particle extend form cover general situationsdiscussion about deviations from geodesic motion relies on choice force unique definition ( frad_gen ] ) has mathematical simplicity physical basis motion of massive particle governed by equations [ eq_mot_gen ] m a(u)=f_(scat)(u ) @xmath36 particle @xmath12-acceleration with frame components @xmath37 quantities @xmath38 and @xmath39 introduced in eq kepler from orthogonality condition @xmath40 relation holds [ formula_acc ] a(u)^t=_r a(u)^r+ a(u)^. sequel focus on special case of particle confined to equatorial plane ( @xmath18 ) with @xmath41 @xmath42 components simplify to @xmath43 equatorial motion described by equations @xmath44\nonumber \frac{d \nu^{\hat \phi}}{d\tau } & = \frac{1}{\gamma}\left({a(u_{\hat \phi}}{\gamma_\phi^2}-{\hat r}\right ) -{\gamma}{\gamma_k^2 r}\nu{ \phi}{aligned} @xmath45 @xmath46 acceleration components replaced by force components @xmath47 evolution equations for radial azimuthal coordinates follow from definition @xmath33 @xmath48 @xmath28 force term @xmath49 vanishes geodesic motion superposed fluid to cosmological constant interaction between particles gas not modeled by eq_gen de spacetime @xmath50 @xmath51 cosmological constant t_u^=-u _ vanishes projecting to @xmath33 elaborate force term used at @xmath28 sign change in force outward push as @xmath3 key to transition from capture to escape scenariospolar representation velocity @xmath52 @xmath53 equations take form @xmath54 interaction parameter a= _ 0^ introduced @xmath55 identifies equatorial geodesic case @xmath56 affects first equation special situations analysis equations performed numerically figs.1 fig.2 ] show typical orbits same initial conditions different values interaction strength parameter @xmath56 different values parameter @xmath1 values @xmath57 ( @xmath3 ) imply capture ( escape ) from hole escaping orbits monotonically increasing speed up to speed light.2 small value coupling parameter @xmath56 deviations from geodesic motion appreciated solid lines at @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 ) represent particle motion scattering fluid parameters @xmath62 @xmath63 short - dashed curve corresponds to @xmath28 geodesic motion choice @xmath56 particles scattered fluid with @xmath64 fall into hole negative values @xmath65 allow particles escape capture imply sudden increase speed speed of light@xmath66 finite time preserve causality numerical integration stopped at @xmath66 @xmath67 and @xmath68 choice @xmath56 weaker interaction escaping particles ( @xmath3 ) reach speed light consider multi - component fluid scenarios matter around hole corresponds different fluids different @xmath1 ) schwarzschild background approximation fluids regions mix yield mixture with intermediate values @xmath1 hypothetical speculation explore equation for @xmath69 modifies for presence multi - component matter @xmath70 components parameters @xmath71 and @xmath72 new evolution equation for @xmath69 given by @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 equivalent to heterogeneous mixture with radially - dependent @xmath1 parameter w(r)= set @xmath76 consider presence of ordinary or exotic matter special choices of @xmath77 and @xmath78 numerical integration orbits confirms analysis dominating value of @xmath1 determines final fate particle trajectory in depth analysis multi - component fluid scenario object future investigations motion of massive test particles interacting with perfect fluid schwarzschild black hole investigatedequation fluid @xmath79 corresponds different physical scenarios @xmath1 ordinary to exotic matter interaction with fluid distribution modeled by force term equations motion 4-momentum density particle s rest frame multiplicative constant factor strength interaction deviations from geodesic motion analyzed for values scattering @xmath1 crucial capture @xmath64 or escape @xmath80 ) from black hole measurement effects cosmic matter surrounding astrophysical objects d. bini. geralico jantzen. semerk l. stella relativistic poynting - robertson effect photon flux with nonzero angular momentum quantum gravity 035008 ( 2011 | 0.496442 | 3,000 | 1,575 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,986 | we discuss target mass effects in the polarized virtual photon structure functions @xmath0 , @xmath1 for the kinematic region @xmath2 , where @xmath3 is the mass squared of the probe ( target ) photon .
we obtain the expressions for the structure functions in closed form by inverting the nachtmann moments for the twist-2 and twist-3 operators .
numerical analysis shows that target mass effects appear at large @xmath4 and become sizable near the maximal value of @xmath4 , as the ratio @xmath5 increases .
target mass effects for the sum rules of @xmath6 and @xmath7 are also discussed . | we would like to talk about the virtual photon structure , especially on the mass effects in the polarized photon structure functions . in the last several years
, there has been much interest in the spin - dependent photon structure functions which can be studied in the polarized version of the @xmath8 collider or more directly in the polarized @xmath9 collision in the future linear collider ( figure.1 ) .
now let us consider the two - photon process in the polarized electron - positron collision where both of the photons are off - shell .
we particularly consider the case where the mass square of the probephoton , @xmath10 , is much bigger than that of the targetphoton , @xmath11 , which is in turn much bigger than the square of the qcd scale , @xmath12 .
the advantage for studying the virtual photon target in this kinematical region is that we can calculate whole structure functions @xmath6 and @xmath7 in perturbative qcd up to next - leading - order ( nlo ) , in contrast to the real photon target where there remain uncalculable non - perturbative pieces .
note that the 1st moment of @xmath6 is related to the axial anomaly just like the nucleon case , while the second structure function @xmath7 only exists for the virtual photon target ( @xmath13 ) .
now the possible mass effects are twofold ; target - mass effects and quark - mass effects . here in this
talk we discuss the former , which appear as power - corrections in @xmath5 . for the real photon target ( @xmath14 ) , there is no need to consider target mass corrections .
but when the target becomes off - shell and for relatively low values of @xmath10 , contributions suppressed by powers of @xmath15 may become important .
then we need to take into account these target mass contributions just like the case of the nucleon structure functions .
the consideration of target mass effects ( tme ) is important by another reason . for the virtual photon target ,
the maximal value of the bjorken variable @xmath4 is not 1 but @xmath16 due to the constraint @xmath17 , which is contrasted with the nucleon case where @xmath18 .
the structure functions should vanish at @xmath19 .
however , the nlo qcd result @xcite for @xmath20 ( see also the second paper of @xcite ) shows that the predicted graph does not vanish but remains finite at @xmath19 . in this talk
we discuss the tme for @xmath20 and @xmath21 in the framework of operator product expansion ( ope ) supplemented by the renormalization group ( rg ) method @xcite .
let us consider the structure tensor @xmath22 which is the absorptive part of the forward scattering amplitude @xmath23 ( figure 2 ) : @xmath24 for the target photon with mass squared @xmath25 probed by the photon with @xmath26 .
the antisymmetric part @xmath27 under @xmath28 and @xmath29 , can be decomposed as @xmath30 which gives two spin - dependent structure functions , @xmath31 and @xmath32 . when the target is real photon ( @xmath33 ) , @xmath7 is identically zero , and there exists only one spin structure function , @xmath34 . while , for the off - shell or virtual photon ( @xmath35 ) target , we have two spin - dependent structure functions @xmath6 and @xmath7 . the deep inelastic photon - photon scattering ( figure 2 . )
amplitude relevant for the polarized structure functions is given by @xmath36 for the product of the two electromagnetic currents we apply the ope and obtain for the @xmath37-@xmath38 antisymmetric part @xmath39 where @xmath40 and @xmath41 are the twist-2 and twist-3 operators , respectively , and are both traceless , and @xmath42 and @xmath43 are corresponding coefficient functions .
the twist-2 operators @xmath40 have totally symmetric lorentz indices @xmath44 , while the indices of twist-3 operators @xmath41 are totally symmetric among @xmath45 but antisymmetric under @xmath46 .
for the photon target we evaluate _ matrix elements _ " of the traceless operators @xmath40 and @xmath41 sandwiched by two photon states with momentum @xmath47 , which are written in the following forms : @xmath48\cdots\mu_{n-1}\}}~,\label{mattwist3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the subscript amp stands for the amputation of external photon lines , @xmath49 and @xmath50 are reduced photon matrix elements .
the traceless tensors @xmath51 and @xmath52\cdots\mu_{n-1}\}}$ ] satisfy the traceless conditions for @xmath53 : @xmath54 taking the of ( [ currentprodfourier ] ) with the virtual photon states , we obtain the deep - inelastic photon - photon forward scattering amplitude . the basic idea for treating target mass corrections
exactly is to take account of trace terms in the traceless tensors properly @xcite .
we evaluate the contraction between @xmath55 and the traceless tensors without neglecting any of the trace terms .
the results are expressed in terms of gegenbauer polynomials .
now we follow the same procedures as were taken by wandzura @xcite and in ref .
@xcite for the polarized nucleon case , and we obtain the analytic expression of the nachtmann moments @xcite for the twist-2 and twist-3 operators with definite spin @xmath56 . by writing down the dispersion relations for the amplitudes and with the use of orthogonality relations as well as an integration formula for gegenbauer polynomials @xmath57 , we project out @xmath58 and @xmath59 with definite spin @xmath56 , which still include the infinite series in powers of @xmath5 .
we then sum up those infinite series and express them in compact analytic forms @xcite .
then we obtain the nachtmann moments @xcite : @xmath60 \nonumber\\ & & \hspace{-0.5cm}\quad ( n=1,3,\cdots ) , \label{nacht2}\\ & & \hspace{-0.5cm}m_3^n \equiv \sum_i a_{(3)i}^{\gamma , n}e_{(3 ) i}^n(q^2,p^2,g)\nonumber\\ & & \hspace{-0.5cm}=\int_0^{x_{\rm max}}\frac{dx}{x^2}{\xi}^{n+1}\left [ \frac{x}{\xi}g_1^\gamma(x , q^2,p^2)\right.\nonumber\\ & & \hspace{-0.5cm}\left.+\left\{\frac{n}{n-1}\frac{x^2}{\xi^2}+ \frac{n}{n+1}\frac{p^2x^2}{q^2 } \right\}g_2^\gamma(x , q^2,p^2 ) \right ] \nonumber\\ & & \quad ( n=3,5 , \cdots),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath61 and @xmath62 , the so - called @xmath62-scaling variable @xcite , is given by @xmath63 the allowed range of @xmath62 is @xmath64 , and @xmath65 . in the nucleon case ,
the constraint @xmath66 gives @xmath67 and @xmath68 , leading to the problem of non - vanishing structure function at @xmath69 .
the resolution to this problem was argued in refs .
@xcite , by considering the dynamical higher - twist effects . @xmath70 and @xmath71 are perturbatively calculable .
in fact , the perturbative qcd calculation of @xmath70 has been done in lo @xcite and in nlo @xcite , while the qcd analysis of @xmath71 has been carried out in lo for the flavor non - singlet part in the limit of large @xmath72 @xcite .
once the moments @xmath70 and @xmath71 are known , we can derive @xmath31 and @xmath32 as functions of @xmath4 by inverting @xmath70 and @xmath71 as follows : @xmath73 where @xmath74 and we have introduced the following functions first discussed in ref .
@xcite : @xmath75 in figure 3 , we have shown @xmath31 with tme as a function of @xmath4 ( solid curve ) for @xmath76 gev@xmath77 ( upper ) with @xmath78 gev@xmath77 and for @xmath79 gev@xmath77 ( lower ) with @xmath78 gev@xmath77 . the vertical axis is in units of @xmath80 , where @xmath81 , the qed coupling constant , @xmath82 is the number of active flavors , and @xmath83 with @xmath84 being the electric charge of @xmath85th flavor quark .
also plotted are @xmath31 without tme ( dashed curve ) and the one with tme included up to the first order in @xmath5 ( short - dashed curve ) .
we observe that the target mass effects appear between intermediate @xmath4 and @xmath86 , and that the effects become sizable when the ratio @xmath5 is increased .
the distinction between the behaviors of @xmath6 with and without tme is remarkable near @xmath86 .
we get @xmath87 for @xmath76 gev@xmath77 with @xmath78 gev@xmath77 and @xmath88 for @xmath79 gev@xmath77 with @xmath78 gev@xmath77 .
the graphs of @xmath6 with tme vanish at @xmath86 as they should .
if tme is not taken into account , the polarized virtual photon structure function @xmath31 satisfies the following sum rule @xcite : @xmath89 note for the real photon target we have the vanishing sum rule @xcite .
the right - hand side corresponds to the twist-2 contribution , and actually the first term is the consequence of the qed axial anomaly .
now it will be interesting to see how this is modified when tme is included .
once the target mass corrections are taken into account , the above sum rule is modified to the first nachtmann moment , which reads @xmath90g_1^\gamma(x , q^2,p^2)\nonumber\\ & & \hspace{-0.5cm}+\frac{4}{3}\int_0^{x_{\rm max}}dx \frac{\xi^2}{x^2}\frac{p^2x^2}{q^2}g_2^\gamma(x , q^2,p^2)\nonumber\\ & & \hspace{-0.5 cm } = -\frac{3\alpha}{\pi}\sum_{i=1}^{n_f}e_i^4+{\cal o}(\alpha_s)~.\label{firstg1with}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the 1st moment of @xmath6 with tme for the nucleon target was discussed in refs .
the power - series expansion in @xmath5 gives the first order tme , the difference of lhs s of ( [ firstg1with ] ) and ( [ firstg1without ] ) : @xmath91 the 1st moment for @xmath7 without tme known as the burkhardt - cottingham sum rule @xcite : @xmath92 turns into the one with tme given by @xmath93 where the upper - limit of the integration has changed from 1 to @xmath86 .
to summarize we have studied the target mass effects in the virtual photon s spin structure functions , @xmath31 and @xmath1 , which can be measured in the future experiments of the polarized version of the @xmath8 or @xmath9 colliders .
the evaluation of kinematical target mass effects is considered to be important to extract dynamical higher - twist effects .
we have derived the expressions for @xmath0 and @xmath1 in closed form by inverting the nachtmann moments for the twist-2 and twist-3 operators .
our numerical analysis shows that the target mass effects appear at large @xmath4 and become sizable near @xmath94 , as the ratio @xmath5 increases .
here we have also examined the target mass effects for the first - moment sum rules of @xmath6 and @xmath7 . for the kinematic region
we consider , the corrections to the first moment of @xmath6 turn out to be negligibly small .
the first moment of @xmath7 leads to the burkhardt - cottingham sum rule , where only change exists in the upper limit of integration from 1 to @xmath86 .
there still remain two important subjects to be studied .
the first one is the quark - mass effects in @xmath6 and @xmath7 .
the heavy flavor contribution to @xmath95 for the nucleon has been explored in ref.@xcite .
it would be intriguing to investigate the polarized photon case .
another subject yet to be studied is the transition from real to virtual photon , especially the 1st moment sum rule ; how to reconcile the vanishing sum for the former with the non - vanishing one for the latter . | talk virtual photon structure mass effects polarized photon structure functions years interest spin - dependent photon structure functions studied polarized @xmath8 collider polarized @xmath9 collision future linear collider figure.1 consider two - photon process polarized electron - positron collision photons off - shell mass square probephoton @xmath10 bigger than targetphoton @xmath11 bigger square qcd scale @xmath12 advantage studying virtual photon target calculate structure functions @xmath6 @xmath7 perturbative qcd next - leading - order contrast real photon target uncalculable non - perturbative pieces 1st moment @xmath6 related to axial anomaly nucleon case second structure function @xmath7 virtual photon target @xmath13 ) possible mass effects twofold target - mass quark - mass effects discuss former power - corrections in @xmath5 real photon target @xmath14 no need consider target mass corrections target off - shell low values @xmath10 contributions suppressed powers @xmath15 important target mass contributions nucleon structure functions consideration target mass effects ) importantvirtual photon target maximal value bjorken variable @xmath4 not 1 @xmath16 constraint @xmath17 contrasted nucleon case @xmath18 structure functions vanish at @xmath19 nlo qcd result @xmath20 predicted graph vanish finite at @xmath19 discuss tme @xmath20 @xmath21 operator product expansion renormalization group method consider structure tensor @xmath22 absorptive part forward scattering amplitude @xmath23 @xmath24 target photon mass squared @xmath25 @xmath26 antisymmetric part @xmath27 @xmath28 decomposed as @xmath30 two spin - dependent structure functions @xmath31 @xmath32 target real photon @xmath7 zero one spin structure function @xmath34 off - shell virtual photon target two spin - dependent structure functions @xmath6 @xmath7 deep inelastic photon - photon scattering amplitude polarized structure functions @xmath36 product two electromagnetic currents @xmath37-@xmath38 antisymmetric part @xmath40 @xmath41 twist-2 twist-3 operators traceless @xmath42 @xmath43 coefficient functionstwist-2 operators @xmath40 symmetric indices @xmath44 indices twist-3 operators @xmath41 symmetric @xmath45 antisymmetric @xmath46 photon target evaluate matrix elements traceless operators @xmath40 @xmath41 by photon states momentum @xmath47 forms @xmath48 amputation external photon lines @xmath49 @xmath50 reduced photon matrix elements traceless tensors @xmath51 @xmath52 satisfy traceless conditions @xmath53 @xmath54 virtual photon states obtain deep - inelastic photon - forward scattering amplitude target mass corrections account trace terms traceless tensors evaluate contraction between @xmath55 traceless tensors without neglecting trace terms results expressed gegenbauer polynomials follow procedures polarized nucleon case obtain analytic expression nachtmann moments for twist-2 twist-3 operators with definite spin @xmath56 dispersion relations amplitudes orthogonality relations integration formula gegenbauer polynomials project @xmath58 @xmath59 with definite spin @xmath56 include infinite series powers of @xmath5sum up infinite series express analytic forms obtain nachtmann moments @xmath60\nonumber\\\hspace{-0.5cm} n=1,3\cdots )-0.5cm_3^n\sum\gamma )(q^2,p^2,g)\hspace{-0.5cm}{x\frac{dx}{x^2}\xi^{n+1}\frac{x\xi}g_1^\gamma(x q^2,p^2)\nonumber\\\hspace{-0.5cm}\frac{n{n-1}{x^2}\xi^2}{n}{n+1}\frac{p^2x^2}{q^2_2^\gamma(x q^2,p^2 )\nonumber\\\quad n=3,5 \cdots),{aligned} @xmath61 @xmath62-scaling variable given @xmath63 allowed range @xmath62 @xmath64 @xmath65 constraint @xmath66 gives @xmath67 @xmath68 non - vanishing structure function @xmath69 resolution argued dynamical higher - twist effects @xmath70 @xmath71 perturbatively calculableperturbative qcd calculation @xmath70 lo nlo qcd analysis @xmath71 lo flavor non - singlet limit @xmath72 @xcite moments @xmath70 known derive @xmath31 @xmath32 functions @xmath4 inverting @xmath70 @xmath73 @xmath74 introduced functions @xcite @xmath75 figure 3 @xmath31 with tme function @xmath4 solid curve @xmath76 gev@xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79@xmath77 vertical axis in units @xmath80 @xmath81 qed coupling constant @xmath82 number active flavors @xmath83 @xmath84 electric charge of @xmath85th flavor quark plotted @xmath31 without tme with tme @xmath5 - dashed curve target mass effects between @xmath4 and @xmath86 sizable when ratio @xmath5 increased distinction behaviors @xmath6 with without tme near @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath76 gev@xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath88 @xmath79 gev@xmath77 with @xmath78 graphs @xmath6 with tme vanish at @xmath86tme not polarized virtual photon structure @xmath31 satisfies sum rule @xmath89 real photon target vanishing sum rule right - hand side twist-2 contribution first term qed axial anomaly interesting tme included target mass corrections sum rule modified first nachtmann moment @xmath90g_1^\gamma(x q^2,p^2)\nonumber\\\hspace{-0.5cm}\frac{4^{x^2^2^2x^2^2\gamma(x q^2,p^2)\frac{3\alpha}\sum_{i=1}_f_i^4+\alpha_s{firstg1with{aligned 1st moment @xmath6 with tme nucleon target discussed power - series expansion @xmath5 gives first order tme difference lhs s firstg1with firstg1without @xmath91 1st moment @xmath7 without tme burkhardt - cottingham sum rule @xmath92 turns with tme @xmath93 upper - limit integration changed from 1 to @xmath86studied target mass effects virtual photon s spin structure functions @xmath31 @xmath1 measured future experiments polarized @xmath8 @xmath9 colliders evaluation kinematical target mass effects important higher - twist effects derived expressions @xmath0 @xmath1 inverting nachtmann moments twist-2 twist-3 operators analysis target mass effects appear at @xmath4 sizable near @xmath94 ratio @xmath5 increases examined target mass effects first - moment sum rules @xmath6 @xmath7 corrections first moment @xmath6 negligibly small first moment @xmath7 leads to burkhardt - cottingham sum rule change upper limit integration from 1 to @xmath86 two subjects quark - mass effects in @xmath6 @xmath7 heavy flavor contribution to @xmath95 explored investigate polarized photon case transition from real to virtual photon 1st moment sum rule vanishing sum non - vanishing | 0.431652 | 2,975 | 1,605 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
197,995 | we consider a two - level system coupled to a mesoscopic two - terminal conductor that acts as measuring device . as a convenient description of the conductor
we introduce its scattering matrix .
we show how its elements can be used to calculate the relaxation and decoherence rates of the two - level system .
special emphasis is laid on the charge screening in the conductor that becomes important in the many - channel limit .
finally we give some examples that illustrate charge screening in different limits .
the detection of quantum states by means of mesoscopic detectors is of fundamental importance from the point of view of quantum measurement theory .
it is also important due to the recent interest in different schemes of quantum computation for which the read - out process must be a key step @xcite . a detector ,
typically , has a back action @xcite on the measured system and thus can also be used to introduce decoherence in a controlled way .
here we are concerned with a simple prototype of a detector that consists of a mesoscopic conductor capacitively coupled to the state of a nearby quantum system ( see fig .
( [ sketch1 ] ) ) .
the most basic quantum system is a two state system here taken to be two mesoscopic quantum dots weakly coupled to each other .
recent experiments demonstrated elegantly the effect of a detector on a phase coherent mesoscopic system @xcite .
different aspects of weak measurement were addressed in several theoretical discussions : the relation between detector noise and decoherence @xcite , their connection to measurement time @xcite and to scattering theory @xcite .
master equation approaches have been used to study the time evolution of system and detector @xcite .
these equations have been refined to describe also conditional evolution depending on the outcome of the measurement @xcite .
tunnel contacts and single electron transistors have been identified as candidates for efficient measurement devices @xcite . for such devices
it is natural to ask whether their speed can be improved by increasing their size .
one is tempted to expect that the sensitivity of a detector grows when we add more and more conductance channels .
the bigger the detector the less the uncertainty due to the shot noise compared to the signal of the detector
. however , this effect competes with the charge screening between different conductance channels through the detector that grows as well with increasing channel number .
this screening tends to suppress the sensitivity of the detector .
charge screening is often neglected in mesoscopic physics .
typically investigated quantities are dc - currents and low frequency current noises which are insensitive to displacement currents in the system .
however , there are quantities that depend crucially on screening : ac - conductance measurements pick up screening currents in the system : at contacts which permit the exchange of particles these become noticeable only if the frequency gets of the order of the inverse dwell time in the system ; at nearby capacitors only displacement currents contribute and can be measured at arbitrary low frequencies @xcite . furthermore non - linear current - voltage characteristics depend on the charge distribution inside mesoscopic conductors @xcite . in the case of mesoscopic detectors the quantity of interest is the charge fluctuations in the detector . like the currents induced into a nearby gate this quantity is subject to screening already in the low - frequency limit
! earlier work focused on the effect of screening on the decoherence rate induced by the measurement process under the assumptions that both detector and system are described by a scattering matrix @xcite .
it is the aim of this work to investigate the effect of charge screening in the detector on the dd system shown in fig .
[ sketch1 ] . | the model we consider is shown in fig . [ sketch1 ] . a double dot ( dd ) plays the role of a two - level system : the topmost electron in the dd
can either occupy the upper or the lower dot . a mesoscopic two - terminal conductor ( mc ) serves as a detector :
its conductance is sensitive to the charge on the upper dot .
a set of capacitances @xmath0 describes the coupling between charges of system @xmath1 and detector @xmath2 ( we often use the capacitance in series @xmath3 ) .
single electron movement in such a setup was recently measured @xcite .
three different time scales describe the interaction of system and detector : in the system we distinguish the thermal _ relaxation _ to an equilibrium distribution ( described by a rate @xmath4 ) and the often much faster _ decoherence _ of superpositions of states in the upper and lower dot ( described by a rate @xmath5 ) .
the decoherence depends as well on temperature @xmath6 as on the voltage difference @xmath7 between the terminals of the detector .
applying such a voltage difference permits to measure the state of the system which leads to additional decoherence .
the _ measurement _ process takes some time which is needed to overcome the uncertainty due to shot noise in the detector and is characterized by a third rate @xmath8 .
the decoherence rate @xmath5 at zero temperature is intimately related to the measurement rate @xmath8 and satisfies the inequality @xmath9 @xcite .
an important measure of the quality of the detector is the efficiency @xmath10 .
ideally one would like to find detectors with an efficiency @xmath11 . even in the single channel case an ideal detector @xmath12
is found only under some special conditions ( time - reversal and space - inversion symmetry @xcite ) .
it is shown in ref .
@xcite that an efficient multi - channel detector is subject to a _
third _ condition that links sensitivities and shot noises of different channels @xmath13 where @xmath14 denotes the transmission probability of channel @xmath15 .
a violation of this condition can reduce the efficiency of multichannel detectors @xmath16 drastically in the presence of disorder . in general a large mesoscopic detector is therefore not much faster than a single channel detector . in this publication
we concentrate on another property that lowers the detection speed of multichannel detectors .
the charge fluctuation in one channel can be screened by the charge of other channels .
this effect will depend strongly on the geometry of the detector . in order to be able to describe a large variety of detectors we therefore represent the mc by a scattering matrix @xmath17 that connects in- and outgoing states ( @xmath18 label left and right reservoir ) .
this enables us to treat multi - channel mcs with arbitrary transmission probabilities @xmath19 .
we only consider the case of weak coupling between mc and dd and may thus use a standard master equation ( bloch - redfield approach @xcite ) in lowest order perturbation theory to study the evolution of the reduced density matrix of the dd . on this level of approximation
the dynamics of the dd is influenced only via the charge fluctuation spectrum @xmath20 of the mc . at low frequencies this spectrum
is fully characterized by a generalized wigner - smith time delay matrix @xcite ( @xmath21 label the reservoirs ) @xmath22 the derivative @xmath23 is taken with respect to the electrostatic potential in the mc .
the following constants that appear also in the context of ac - transport @xcite describe the geometry of the detector ( @xmath24 denotes the electron charge ) @xmath25 @xmath26 corresponds to the density of states at fermi energy in the scattering region , @xmath27 is an effective electrochemical capacitance that characterizes the strength of interaction , @xmath28 expresses the equilibrium contribution @xcite to the charge fluctuation spectrum @xmath20 , and @xmath29 the non - equilibrium contribution @xcite .
the fifth constant @xmath30 is of different origin @xcite and can not be expressed by matrix ( [ density elements ] ) only .
it describes the ratio of detector sensitivity and shot noise in the presence of screening .
the two - level system is conventionally represented by the hamiltonian @xmath31 where @xmath32 denote pauli matrices .
the energy difference between upper and lower dot is @xmath33 and @xmath34 accounts for tunneling between the dots .
the full level splitting is thus @xmath35 .
the relaxation , decoherence and measurement rates are given by the following expressions @xcite ( here and in the following we set @xmath36 ) : @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 they have formally the same appearance as the rates given in @xcite .
the geometric structure of the detector is contained in the five parameters given in ( [ four parameters ] ) . in the following
we analyze the behavior of these parameters to discuss the screening properties of the detector .
the parameter @xmath28 does not exceed the range @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the dimension of the scattering matrix .
this demonstrates that the relaxation and decoherence rates @xmath42 do not simply scale with the number of channels through the system . the multichannel result for the relaxation and decoherence rates
can not be obtained as a sum of rates due to each channel .
the constants @xmath28 and @xmath29 are renormalized by a denominator @xmath43 depending on all channels .
this denominator originates from screening . for a large number @xmath41 of open channels
@xmath28 behaves as @xmath44 whereas the electrochemical capacitance @xmath45 tends to a constant .
the constant @xmath29 decreases also like @xmath44 .
we find therefore the somewhat surprising result that relaxation and decoherence decrease in the large channel limit .
this result is a consequence of screening in the mc which reduces the charge fluctuations with increasing channel number @xmath41 .
we briefly explain the derivation of our results .
the coulomb hamiltonian of our model contains three terms @xmath46 its first term contributes to the level splitting of the dd ( @xmath47 is a background charge depending on the applied voltage @xmath48 ) .
the charging energy @xmath49 must be large compared to @xmath50 to allow us to consider only two levels of the dd . the second term @xmath51 couples system and detector . to derive a master equation for the reduced density matrix we assume weak coupling and treat this term perturbatively .
we apply a markov approximation which is strictly speaking only valid at long time scales ( compared to the correlation time of the detector ) .
this permits us to consider only the low - frequency matrix elements of the charge operator that are given by the wigner - smith matrix ( [ density elements ] ) .
the third term affects the fluctuation spectrum @xmath52 of the charge operator @xmath53 .
in contrast to earlier work ( with the exception of ref .
@xcite ) we do not completely disregard this term , but include it on the level of rpa .
this allows us to treat screening in a gaussian approximation valid for geometries in which coulomb blockade effects are weak . to get insight into the fluctuation spectrum , we study the time evolution of the charge @xmath53 on the mc within rpa
this charge is composed of two components : the bare charge @xmath54 that arises from the noninteracting problem and the screening charge which is a response to the self - consistent potential @xmath55 on the mc .
we therefore have in frequency representation @xmath56 in the first equation , @xmath57 is the linear response function .
the second equation expresses the self - consistency condition for the potential @xmath55 .
these two equations can be combined by eliminating the potential @xmath55 . the total charge on the mc is found to be @xmath58 this result shows nicely the two possible effects of the random phase approximation . on the one hand , the prefactor @xmath59 reduces the fluctuations of the bare charge @xmath54 which is compensated partially by a screening charge . on the other hand , we get a back action of the charge @xmath60 of the upper dot on the charge @xmath53 in the mc .
however , this back action is small by a factor @xmath61 and can be omitted in second order perturbation theory .
the examples of this section are not meant to model the geometry of a realistic measuring apparatus .
but they demonstrate nicely the influence of the geometry on the speed and efficiency of the measuring process . as a first generic example we discuss a * short quantum point contact * which is defined by two sharp barriers of distance @xmath62 .
its potential is given by @xmath63 with @xmath64.\ ] ] note that this potential violates inversion symmetry for @xmath65 .
for convenience we introduce the following parameters : the wave vector @xmath66 where @xmath67 is the effective mass of the electron and @xmath68 the fermi energy .
we consider the limit of a mc much shorter than the fermi wave length @xmath69 .
using the general formula ( [ density elements ] ) we calculate the density of state matrix ( we set @xmath36 ) @xmath70 it is now straightforward to obtain the measurement efficiency of the mc at zero temperature @xmath71 for an asymmetric mc with @xmath65 the efficiency is suboptimal . for a * long quantum point contact * with @xmath72 charge screening
gets effective .
the constants @xmath28 and @xmath29 that determine the relaxation and decoherence rates then decrease with increasing number of open channels @xmath41 .
we illustrate this effect using the following toy potential @xmath73 its scattering matrix can be found in @xcite . to get the full density of state matrix ( [ density elements ] ) we replace the potential derivative @xmath23 in ( [ density elements ] ) by a parametric derivative @xmath74 .
the elements of ( [ density elements ] ) can be expressed by digamma - functions . as a confining potential
we choose @xmath75 . as in a two - dimensional electron gas
only the lowest mode in z - direction is occupied .
[ integrable qpc ] compares the cases of ineffective charge screening @xmath76 and effective screening @xmath77 .
it shows the decoherence ( measurement ) rate at zero temperature @xmath6 and finite bias @xmath7 depending on the number of open channels through the constriction .
we change this number by varying the confinement frequency @xmath78 .
the decoherence rate reaches maximal values if one transmission channel @xmath15 is half - open @xmath79 .
this corresponds to a maximum in the sensitivity @xmath80 . in the case of
ineffective screening the decoherence rate does not depend on the number of open channels , whereas screening reduces decoherence in the case of many open channels .
in this work we have investigated the weak measurement of a two state system ( a double quantum dot ) capacitively coupled to a mesoscopic conductor .
we have presented expressions for the relaxation rate , the decoherence rate and the measurement rate in terms of capacitance coefficients and in terms of potential derivatives of the scattering matrix .
the discussion illustrates that scattering theory is useful not only for the discussion of dc - transport processes in mesoscopic physics but in fact has a much wider range of applicability .
we have emphasized screening in the detector : as illustrated in fig .
[ integrable qpc ] the decoherence rate and similarly the relaxation and measurement rate ) are rappidly reduced with increasing channel number .
our discussion is based only on a single fluctuating potential in the detector but in principle a refined calculation which takes into account a more realistic potential distribution is possible @xcite .
this work was supported by the swiss national science foundation . + * note added in proof : * recently an instructive , information theoretical discussion of the problem treated in this work was provided by clerk , girvin , and stone @xcite . for recent experimental advances in the read - out of dynamic states
see : d. vion , a. aassime , a. cottet , p. joyez , h. pothier , c. urbina , d. esteve , and m. h. devoret , science * 296 * , 886 ( 2002 ) . y. yu , s. han , x. chu , s .-
chu , z. wang , science * 296 * , 889 ( 2002 ) ; y. nakamura , yu .
a. pashkin , and j. s. tsai , nature ( london ) * 398 * , 357 ( 2001 ) . | model in fig . sketch1 double dot dd ) two - level system topmost electron upper or lower dot mesoscopic two - terminal conductor mc ) detector conductance sensitive to charge upper dot capacitances @xmath0 coupling between charges system @xmath1 detector @xmath2 capacitance series @xmath3 single electron movement measured @xcite three time scales interaction system detector thermal relaxation to equilibrium distribution rate @xmath4 faster decoherence of superpositions upper lower dot rate @xmath5 ) decoherence depends on temperature voltage difference @xmath7 between terminals detector voltage difference state leads to additional decoherence measurement process takes time uncertainty shot noise characterized by third rate @xmath8 decoherence rate @xmath5 at zero temperature related to measurement rate @xmath8 satisfies inequality @xmath9 @xcite measure quality detector efficiency @xmath10 detectors efficiency @xmath11 ideal detector @xmath12 under special conditions ( time - reversal space - inversion symmetry shown in ref .efficient multi - channel detector subject to third condition links sensitivities shot noises different channels denotes transmission probability of channel violation efficiency in disorder large mesoscopic detector not faster than single channel detector on property lowers detection speed multichannel charge fluctuation in one channel screened by charge other channels on geometry detector represent mc by scattering matrix connects in- outgoing states left right reservoir treat multi - channel mcs with arbitrary transmission probabilities consider weak coupling between mc and dd use standard master equation bloch - redfield approach in lowest order perturbation theory study evolution of reduced density matrix of dd dynamics dd influenced via charge fluctuation spectrum of mc at low frequencies spectrum characterized by generalized wigner - smith time delay matrix @xmath21 label reservoirs derivative @xmath23 taken electrostatic potential in mc constants context ac - transport @xcite describe geometry detector @xmath24 electron charge @xmath25 density of states at fermi energy in scattering region @xmath27 electrochemical capacitance strength of interaction @xmath28 equilibrium contribution to charge fluctuation spectrum @xmath29 non - equilibrium contribution fifth constant @xmath30 different origin not expressed by matrix density elements describes ratio detector sensitivity shot noise in screening two - level system represented by hamiltonian @xmath31 @xmath32 pauli matrices energy difference between upper lower dot @xmath33 @xmath34 accounts for tunneling between dots full level splitting is @xmath35 relaxation decoherence measurement rates by expressions @xcite @xmath38 @xmath39 same appearance as rates @xcite geometric structure detector in five parameters behavior screening properties parameter @xmath28 exceed range @xmath40 @xmath41 dimension of scattering matrix relaxation decoherence rates not scale with number channels multichannel result for rates not as sum of rates each channelconstants @xmath28 renormalized by denominator @xmath43 depending channels originates from screening large number @xmath41 open channels @xmath28 behaves as @xmath44 electrochemical capacitance @xmath45 constant constant @xmath29 decreases like @xmath44 relaxation decoherence decrease in large channel limit consequence of screening reduces charge fluctuations increasing channel number @xmath41 derivation coulomb hamiltonian contains three terms @xmath46 first term contributes to level splitting dd background charge voltage charging energy @xmath49 must large compared to @xmath50 two levels dd second term @xmath51 couples system detector equation for reduced density matrix assume weak coupling treat term perturbatively apply markov approximation valid at long time scales consider low - frequency matrix elements of operator wigner - smith matrix third term affects fluctuation spectrum @xmath52 of charge operator @xmath53 disregard term include on level of rpa screening in gaussian approximation for geometries coulomb blockade effects weakfluctuation spectrum study time evolution charge @xmath53 on mc within rpa two components bare charge @xmath54 noninteracting problem screening charge response to self - consistent potential @xmath55 frequency representation @xmath56 first equation @xmath57 linear response function second equation self - consistency condition for potential @xmath55 equations combined eliminating potential @xmath55 total charge mc @xmath58 shows effects random phase approximation prefactor @xmath59 reduces fluctuations bare charge @xmath54 compensated by screening charge back action of charge @xmath60 upper dot on charge @xmath53 mc back action small by factor @xmath61 omitted in second order perturbation theory examples not geometry demonstrate influence on speed efficiency measuring process short quantum point contact defined by two barriers distance @xmath62 potential by @xmath63 with @xmath64 potential violates inversion symmetry for @xmath65 introduce parameters wave vector @xmath66 @xmath67 effective mass electron @xmath68 fermi energy limit of mc shorter than fermi wave length @xmath69general formula density calculate density state matrix @xmath36 @xmath70 obtain measurement efficiency mc at zero temperature @xmath71 asymmetric mc with @xmath65 efficiency suboptimal long quantum point contact @xmath72 screening effective constants @xmath28 @xmath29 relaxation decoherence rates decrease open channels @xmath41 illustrate toy potential @xmath73 scattering matrix @xcite full density replace potential derivative @xmath23 by parametric derivative @xmath74 elements expressed digamma - functions confining potential choose @xmath75 two - dimensional electron gas lowest mode z - direction occupied qpc compares ineffective charge screening @xmath76 effective screening @xmath77 decoherence rate at zero temperature @xmath6 finite bias @xmath7 open channels change varying confinement frequency @xmath78 decoherence rate maximal one transmission channel @xmath15 half - open @xmath79 maximum sensitivity @xmath80 ineffective screening decoherence rate open channels screening reduces decoherence many open channels investigated weak measurement two state system double quantum dot coupled mesoscopic conductorpresented expressions for relaxation decoherence rate measurement rate in capacitance coefficients potential derivatives of scattering matrix discussion illustrates scattering theory useful for dc - transport processes mesoscopic physics wider range applicability emphasized screening in detector illustrated in fig . decoherence rate relaxation measurement rate reduced with increasing channel number discussion based on single fluctuating potential in detector refined calculation realistic potential distribution possible supported by swiss national science foundation theoretical discussion problem provided by clerk girvin stone recent experimental advances in read - out dynamic states see d. vion aassime cottet joyez pothier urbina esteve h devoret science * 296, 886 ( 2002 ) y yu han chu chu z wang science 296 889 2002 ) nakamura pashkin s tsai nature london * 398 * , 357 ( 2001 ) | 0.435419 | 2,728 | 1,365 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,004 | the balian - vnroni variational approach has been implemented using a 3-dimensional time - dependent hartree - fock ( tdhf ) code with realistic skyrme interactions and used to investigate the mass dispersions from giant dipole resonances in @xmath0s and @xmath1sn decaying through particle emission .
the fluctuations obtained are shown to be quantitatively larger than the standard tdhf results . | the time - dependent hartree - fock ( tdhf ) approach can be used to determine the expectation values of single - particle observables , such as fragment mass , in nuclear reactions and decays but is known to underestimate the fluctuations in these values @xcite .
this is due to the 1-body nature of tdhf and the fact that it neglects 2-body correlations .
this problem has previously been studied by balian and vnroni @xcite , who derived a general variational theory for the determination of expectation values , correlations and fluctuations .
they found that , given the state of a system described , at the time @xmath2 , by the 1-body density matrix , @xmath3 ( a slater determinant satisfying @xmath4 ) , the fluctuation , @xmath5 , in a 1-body observable , @xmath6 , at some later time @xmath7 , is given by @xmath8 , \label{eqn : bv}\ ] ] where @xmath9 is a 1-body density matrix related to @xmath10 through the boundary condition @xmath11 and where the time evolution of @xmath10 and @xmath9 is given by the usual tdhf equation .
this result is significantly different from the standard tdhf result @xmath12 , \label{eqn : tdhf}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in that it depends on the initial time , @xmath2 , with the final time , @xmath7 , entering only through the boundary condition ( [ eqn : sigma ] ) . the other key feature of this result is that it contains , through ( [ eqn : sigma ] ) , the observable @xmath6 such that this method is specifically tuned to the determination of the fluctuation of the observable of interest . a practical implementation of ( [ eqn : bv ] ) requires that a hartree - fock calculation be performed to determine the initial state , @xmath3 .
the system is then excited by a suitable external excitation , and a tdhf calculation performed from @xmath13 to determine @xmath14 .
this is used to obtain @xmath15 using ( [ eqn : sigma ] ) and a second tdhf calculation is then performed with the tdhf code run backwards , @xmath16 , to obtain @xmath17 .
the transformation ( [ eqn : sigma ] ) and the second tdhf calculation must be repeated for a range of values of @xmath18 to allow @xmath19 to be determined by extrapolation to @xmath20 .
the large number of computations required to evaluate ( [ eqn : bv ] ) and the complexity of these calculations means that only a handful of calculations have been performed using this method and those calculations which have been performed have used simplified interactions and made use of symmetries ( either spherical @xcite , or axial @xcite ) to render the problems tractable .
however , modern advances in computing power mean that this approach can now be implemented using fully 3-dimensional tdhf codes with full skyrme interactions @xcite .
we consider the mass dispersion in a bounded region of space around a giant dipole resonance ( gdr ) which decays through particle emission and calculate the mass ( number of nucleons ) in the nucleus according to @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the cutoff radius used to define the bounded region of space .
the nucleus was excited by multiplying the ground state wavefunctions from the hf calculation by a dipole boost given by @xmath23 with @xmath24 and where , for protons , @xmath25 , and for neutrons , @xmath26 , where @xmath27 is the atomic mass number of the nucleus under investigation and @xmath28 is its charge .
@xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 determine the strength of the boost applied to the nucleus .
written in terms of the single particle wavefunctions ( [ eqn : bv ] ) becomes @xcite @xmath32 @xmath33 the wavefunctions @xmath34 were obtained from the results of a static hartree - fock calculation , whilst the wavefunctions @xmath35 result from the backwards tdhf calculations and are related to the wavefunctions @xmath36 through the boundary condition @xmath37
we consider first a gdr in @xmath0s calculated using the skyrme interaction with the sly6 @xcite parametrisation .
all calculations were performed in a cubic model space of size @xmath38 fm discretised in steps of @xmath39 fm .
the initial hf calculation gave a @xmath0s ground state with a total binding energy of @xmath40 mev ( compared with the experimental value of @xmath41 mev @xcite ) and a prolate deformation ( @xmath42 ) . at the beginning of the dynamic calculation
the ground state wavefunctions were boosted in accordance with ( [ eqn : gdr - boost ] ) and with @xmath43 @xmath44 . the simulation was allowed to run from an initial time @xmath45 fm / c to @xmath46 fm / c in steps of @xmath47 fm / c .
the emitted nucleons were reflected back from the boundary of the box and would , were the simulation allowed to run long enough , re - enter the region occupied by the de - exciting nucleus causing unphysical interactions .
an analysis of the density and of @xmath48 as a function of time was used to verify that the number of nuclei in the nucleus had stabilised well in advance of the time @xmath7 and that the radiated flux had not had enough time to be reflected back and to interact with the nucleus .
the dipole moments , @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 , were obtained as a function of time using @xcite @xmath52 where @xmath53,@xmath54,@xmath55 denotes @xmath56 , @xmath57 and @xmath58 and @xmath59 and @xmath60 are the expectation values for position calculated using the proton and neutron single particle states respectively .
this is shown in figure [ fig : s32](a ) . due to the prolate deformation of the @xmath0s nucleus ,
the @xmath50 and @xmath51 values are identical and differ from the @xmath49 values .
the periodicity of @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 allow the excitation energies for the oscillations along each of the three primary axes to be estimated .
in this instance we obtain , for @xmath49 , a period of @xmath61 fm / c giving an excitation energy @xmath62 mev and , for @xmath50 and @xmath51 , a period of @xmath63 fm / c giving an excitation energy @xmath64 mev .
the final state gave @xmath65 with @xmath66 using @xmath67 fm which represents the emission of @xmath68 nucleons .
@xmath22 was chosen so that the bounded region fully enclosed the nucleus but omitted , as much as possible , the extended ( or dissipated ) components of the wavefunctions .
the transformation ( [ eqn : sp - psi ] ) was then applied and the tdhf code was run in reverse .
this process was repeated for @xmath18 values in the range @xmath69 in steps of @xmath70 . at the end of each time - reversed calculation the fluctuation , @xmath71 ,
was estimated using ( [ eqn : sp - bv ] ) .
these values were plotted ( see figure [ fig : s32](b ) ) and a straight line was fitted to the linear section of the graph and extended back to @xmath72 to obtain @xmath73 which represents a @xmath74% increase in @xmath75 using the bv approach compared with the standard tdhf result .
this graph is typical of those obtained using this approach and is linear for larger values of @xmath18 increasing asymptotically as @xmath20 due to the @xmath76 term in ( [ eqn : bv ] ) .
often , as in this case , the curve decreases for intermediate values of @xmath18 where the reduced value of @xmath18 means that the transformation ( [ eqn : sp - psi ] ) only has a small effect making the numerator in ( [ eqn : bv ] ) numerically approximately zero and dominant over the @xmath77 denominator .
these calculations have been repeated for the doubly magic nucleus @xmath1sn .
all the calculations were carried out using the same model space and interaction as the @xmath0s calculation .
the hf calculation produced an undeformed ground state with a binding energy of @xmath78 mev ( compared with the accepted value of @xmath79 mev @xcite ) .
the ground state single particle wavefunctions were boosted at the start of the tdhf calculation in accordance with ( [ eqn : gdr - boost ] ) and with @xmath80 @xmath44 and the calculation was run from @xmath45 fm / c to @xmath46 fm / c as in the previous calculation .
the dipole moments were plotted as a function of time and are shown in figure [ fig : sn132](a ) .
the graph shows @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 to be identical as expected for a spherical nucleus and gives the periodicity of the dipole moments as @xmath81 fm / c which corresponds to a resonance energy of @xmath82 mev .
this is close to the experimentally measured value of @xmath83 mev @xcite .
the standard thdf calculation gave , at the time @xmath7 , @xmath84 and @xmath85 representing the emission of 11 nucleons .
a series of transformations and time - reversed tdhf calculations were carried out as previously . the resulting graph , and linear fit ,
are shown in figure [ fig : sn132](b ) which gives @xmath86 and represents a @xmath87% increase in @xmath75 compared with the standard tdhf result .
the balian - vnroni approach has been implemented for the first time using a 3-dimensional tdhf code with the full skyrme interaction .
calculations have been performed for gdrs in @xmath0s and @xmath1sn and have demonstrated that the bv approach does produce quantitatively larger results for the fluctuations of 1-body operators .
this approach is now being applied to heavy ion collisions .
the authors are pleased to acknowledge the assistance of , and discussions with , ph .
chomaz , r. balian , j. s. al - khalili and e. b. suckling .
this work was supported by epsrc grant no .
ep / p501679/1 .
11 p .- g . reinhard , r. y. cusson and k. goeke , nuc .
a*398 * , 141 - 188 ( 1983 ) r. balian and m. vnroni , annals of physics * 281 * , 65 - 142 ( 2000 ) r. balian and m. vnroni , annals of physics * 187 * , 29 - 78 ( 1988 ) r. balian and m. vnroni , annals of physics * 216 * , 351 - 430 ( 1992 ) t. troudet and d. vautherin , phys .
c * 31*(1 ) , 278 - 279 ( 1985 ) j. b. marston and s. e. koonin , phys .
54*(11 ) , 1139 - 1141 ( 1985 ) p. bonche and h. flocard , nucl . phys .
a*437 * , 189 - 207 ( 1985 ) j. a. maruhn , p .-
reinhard , p. d. stevenson and m. r. strayer , phys .
c * 74 * , 027601 ( 2006 ) a. s. umar and v. e. oberacker , phys .
c * 74 * , 024606 ( 2006 ) c. simenel , ph .
chomaz and d. de france , phys .
c * 76 * , 024609 ( 2007 ) t. nakatsukasa and k. yabana , nucl .
a*788 * , 349c-354c ( 2007 ) e. chabanat , p. bonche , p. haensel , j. meyer and r. schaeffer , nucl . phys .
a*635 * , 231 - 256 ( 1998 ) g. audi , a. wapstra and c. thibault , nucl .
a*729 * , 337 - 676 ( 2003 ) p. adrich _ et al .
_ , phys .
lett . * 95 * , 132501 ( 2005 ) | time - dependent hartree - fock ) approach expectation values of single - particle observables fragment mass in nuclear reactions decays underestimate fluctuations due to 1-body nature of tdhf neglects 2-body correlations problem studied by balian vnroni derived general variational theory for determination of expectation values correlations fluctuations found state of system described by 1-body density matrix @xmath3 fluctuation @xmath5 in 1-body observable @xmath6 later @xmath7 given by @xmath8 @xmath9 1-body density matrix related to @xmath10 through boundary condition @xmath11 time evolution of @xmath10 and @xmath9 given by usual tdhf equation result different from standard tdhf result @xmath12 depends on initial time @xmath2 final time @xmath7 entering through boundary condition sigma result contains observable @xmath6 method tuned to determination fluctuation of observable of interest implementation requires hartree - fock calculation to determine initial state , @xmath3 system excited by external excitation tdhf calculation from @xmath13 determine @xmath14 used to obtain @xmath15 using eqn : sigma ] second tdhf calculation with code backwards @xmath16 obtain @xmath17 transformation : sigma second calculation repeated for values of @xmath18 @xmath19 to @xmath20 large number of computations : bv complexity handful of calculations performed using method simplified interactions symmetries modern advances computing approach using fully 3-dimensional tdhf codes with full skyrme interactions consider mass dispersion in bounded region around giant dipole resonance ( gdr ) decays through particle emission calculate mass number of nucleons in nucleus according to @xmath21 @xmath22 is cutoff radius nucleus excited by multiplying ground state wavefunctions by dipole boost by @xmath23 with @xmath24 for protons neutrons @xmath26 @xmath27 is atomic mass number of nucleus @xmath28 charge @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 determine strength of boostsingle particle wavefunctions eqn : bv ] @xcite @xmath32 @xmath33 wavefunctions @xmath34 from static hartree - fock calculation wavefunctions @xmath35 from backwards tdhf calculations related to @xmath36 boundary condition @xmath37 gdr in @xmath0s calculated skyrme interaction sly6 @xcite parametrisation calculations cubic model space @xmath38 fm discretised @xmath39 fm initial hf calculation @xmath0s ground state binding energy @xmath40 mev experimental @xmath41 mev @xcite prolate deformation ( @xmath42 ) calculation ground state wavefunctions boosted eqn : gdr - boost ] @xmath43 @xmath44 simulation @xmath45 to @xmath46 fm / c @xmath47 fm / c emitted nucleons reflected from boundary box re - enter region nucleus causing unphysical interactions analysis density @xmath48 function time number nuclei nucleus stabilised time @xmath7 radiated flux not nucleusdipole moments @xmath49 obtained function time using @xcite @xmath52 @xmath56 expectation values for position calculated proton neutron single particle states shown in figure s32](a prolate deformation @xmath0s nucleus @xmath50 values identical differ from @xmath49 periodicity @xmath49 allow excitation energies oscillations three primary axes estimated @xmath49 period @xmath61 fm / c excitation energy @xmath62 mev @xmath50 period @xmath63 fm / c excitation energy @xmath64 mev final state @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 fm emission of @xmath68 nucleons @xmath22 chosen bounded region enclosed nucleus omitted extended components wavefunctions transformation ( [ eqn : sp - psi ] ) applied tdhf code run in reverse process repeated for @xmath18 values @xmath69 @xmath70 fluctuation @xmath71 estimated using [ eqn : sp - bv ] )values plotted figure s32](b straight line fitted to linear graph extended to @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74% increase in @xmath75 bv approach standard tdhf result graph typical linear for larger values @xmath18 increasing @xmath20 due to @xmath76 term bv curve decreases for intermediate values @xmath18 reduced value transformation sp - psi small effect numerator bv zero dominant over @xmath77 denominator calculations repeated for doubly magic nucleus @xmath1sn same model space interaction @xmath0s calculation hf calculation produced undeformed ground state binding energy @xmath78 mev accepted value @xmath79 mev @xcite ground state particle wavefunctions boosted at tdhf calculation gdr - boost @xmath80 @xmath44 calculation from @xmath45 to @xmath46 dipole moments plotted function of time shown in figure sn132](a graph shows @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 identical for spherical nucleus periodicity dipole moments as @xmath81 fm / c resonance energy of @xmath82 mev close to experimentally measured value @xmath83 mev @xcitestandard thdf calculation gave @xmath7 emission 11 nucleons transformations time - reversed tdhf calculations carried out resulting graph linear fit shown in figure(b @xmath86 @xmath87% increase in @xmath75 standard tdhf result balian - vnroni approach implemented 3-dimensional tdhf code full skyrme interaction calculations performed for @xmath0s @xmath1sn approach larger results for 1-body operators approach applied to heavy ion collisions authors acknowledge assistance discussions ph . chomaz r. balian j. s. al - khalili e. b. suckling work supported by epsrc grant no / p501679/1 reinhard cusson k. goeke 141 - 188 ( 1983 ) balian m vnroni annals 281 65 - 142 ( 2000 187 29 - 78 ( 1988 216 351 - 430 ( 1992 t. troudet d. vautherin 278 - 279 ( 1985 j b. marston s e. koonin 1139 - 1141 ( 1985 ) p. bonche h. flocard*437 189 - 207 1985 ) maruhn reinhard stevenson strayer phys 74 027601 2006 ). umar oberacker 74 024606 2006. simenel chomaz d. de phys 76 024609 ( 2007 ). nakatsukasa k. yabana a*788 349c-354c 2007 ). chabanat p. bonche haensel j. meyer r. schaeffer a*635 231 - 256 ( 1998 ) g. audi. wapstra. thibault a*729 337 - 676 ( 2003 ) p adrich . 95 * 132501 ( 2005 | 0.433386 | 2,848 | 1,487 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,014 | in this work , a quaternion - valued model is proposed in lieu of the clarke s @xmath0 , @xmath1 transformation to convert three - phase quantities to a hypercomplex single - phase signal .
the concatenated signal can be used for harmonic distortion detection in three - phase power systems . in particular , the proposed model maps all the harmonic frequencies into frequencies in the quaternion domain , while the clarke s transformation - based methods will fail to detect the zero sequence voltages .
based on the quaternion - valued model , the fourier transform , the minimum variance distortionless response ( mvdr ) algorithm and the multiple signal classification ( music ) algorithm are presented as examples to detect harmonic distortion .
simulations are provided to demonstrate the potentials of this new modeling method .
shell : bare demo of ieeetran.cls for ieee journals harmonics detection , fourier transform , minimum variance distortionless response , multiple signal classification , quaternion , three - phase power system | power quality control is one of the major concerns for power delivery systems to function reliably , and it requires measurements of voltage characteristics , among which the frequency measurement is a non - trivial task due to the presence of voltage sags and voltage harmonics mostly caused by nonlinear loads @xcite . in the particular case of three - phase power systems , the clarke s @xmath0 , @xmath1 transformation is widely used as the preprocessing method to create a complex - valued single - phase signal from the real - valued three - phase signals @xcite , so that traditional complex - valued spectrum estimation methods can be applied , such as the mvdr method or the recently proposed iterative mvdr ( i - mvdr ) method @xcite . to improve the resolution
, we can further apply the subspace methods and one representative example is the music method @xcite .
however , all the zero sequence voltages will be cancelled out in the complex - valued signal and hence can not be detected .
although these harmonic voltages would simply be blocked by a delta transformer , they will add up in the neutral , leading to overheating in the transformer and potential fire hazards @xcite . to detect these harmonics , as well as harmonics of other orders ,
we propose a quaternion - valued model and all the traditional spectrum estimation methods can be extended to this domain , such as mvdr and music .
we will show that harmonics of all orders will be reserved in the resulting quaternion - valued signal and will be detected by relevant estimation methods .
the rest of this paper is organised as follows .
a brief review of the complex - valued model is presented in section ii .
our quaternion - valued model is proposed in section iii , together with the fourier analysis and the mvdr and music - like estimation algorithms .
simulation results are provided in section iv and conclusions are drawn in section v.
we consider the following discrete - time balanced three - phase power system in the presence of @xmath2 harmonic distortions : @xmath3 where @xmath4 are the amplitudes of the harmonic signals , @xmath5 is the fundamental ( angular ) frequency , @xmath6 is the sampling interval , @xmath7 is the signal phase , and @xmath8 are the measurement noise . traditionally , the three - phase signals will be converted to a complex - valued single - phase signal via the clarke s @xmath9 transformation .
firstly , the three - phase signals are mixed into two parts , namely @xmath10 and @xmath11 , where @xmath12 @xmath13 then these two parts will be merged as a complex - valued signal @xmath14 . with this complex - valued signal
, we can exploit the mvdr spectrum to locate the frequencies , and it is given by : @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the hermitian - transpose operation , @xmath17 is the covariance matrix of dimension @xmath18 , and @xmath19^\mathrm t\ ] ] is the frequency sweeping vector .
we can also use the music spectrum which is expressed as : @xmath20 where @xmath21 denotes the euclidean norm , @xmath22 represents the noise subspace and comprises the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix @xmath17 which are corresponding to the @xmath23 smallest eigenvalues , where @xmath23 is assumed to be known or can be estimated using the information theory methods @xcite . in practice
, the covariance @xmath17 needs to be updated and estimated from the average of samples , @xmath24 where @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the number of observations . in detail , @xmath27 is composed of complex - domain harmonic signals that can be divided into two categories plus noise , @xmath28 where @xmath29 is the summation of all positive sequence voltages , @xmath30 and @xmath31 is the summation of all negative sequence voltages , @xmath32 and @xmath33 denotes the largest integer not greater than @xmath34 .
all the zero sequence voltages have been cancelled out .
zero sequence voltages of the same order are cophasial in the three voltage channels and will be eliminated since both rows of the transformation matrix @xmath35 are zero - mean vectors . to solve this problem
, we propose our quaternion - valued approach in the next section .
we construct a quaternion - valued signal from the three - phase signals as @xmath36 where @xmath37 are the three imaginary units of the quaternion algebra which are constrained by @xcite @xmath38 this quaternion - valued signal contains quaternion - domain harmonic signals that belong to three categories @xmath39 , @xmath40 , @xmath41 plus noise , @xmath42 where @xmath39 is the summation of all the positive sequence voltages , @xmath43\\ & \quad-\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}\sin[(3p-2)(\omega nt_s+\phi)]\big\}\\ & = \sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{h+2}{3}\rfloor}\frac{2\imath-\jmath - k}{2}v_{3p-2}e^{-\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}(3p-2)(\omega nt_s+\phi)}\ ; , \end{split } \label{3p-2}\ ] ] @xmath40 is the summation of all the negative sequence voltages , @xmath44\\ & \quad+\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}\sin[(3p-1)(\omega nt_s+\phi)]\big\}\\ & = \sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{h+1}{3}\rfloor}\frac{2\imath-\jmath - k}{2}v_{3p-1}e^{\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}(3p-1)(\omega nt_s+\phi)}\ ; , \end{split } \label{3p-1}\ ] ] @xmath41 is the summation of all the zero sequence voltages , @xmath45\\ & = \sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor\frac{h}{3}\rfloor}v_{3p}\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{2}\big(e^{\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}3p(\omega nt_s+\phi)}\\ & + e^{-\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}3p(\omega nt_s+\phi)}\big)\;. \end{split } \label{3p}\ ] ] hence all the harmonic signals will be reserved in the quaternion - valued signal
. we may observe from ( [ 3p-2])([3p ] ) that the frequencies of the harmonic signals have been mapped into the frequencies of the quaternion - valued signal associated with the @xmath46 axis ( see fig .
axis , title="fig:",width=211 ] + + then we can adopt the mvdr spectrum in ( [ mvdr ] ) and the music spectrum in ( [ music ] ) by substituting the frequency sweeping vector as @xmath47^\mathrm t\;.\ ] ] the frequencies detected in the spectrum are either the original real - domain angular frequencies or their additive inverses , namely 1 .
if a peak is detected in the spectrum in the absence of its additive inverse , it corresponds to a positive or negative sequence voltage signal and this spectrum peak indicates its angular frequency or its additive inverse .
if two `` mirrored '' peaks are detected in the spectrum , they correspond to a zero sequence voltage signal and they indicate the signal s angular frequency and its additive inverse , respectively .
in this section , we provide some numerical examples to illustrate the performance of the proposed quaternion model . in all experiments ,
the fundamental frequency is 50 hz , the sampling frequency is @xmath48 khz , the initial phase is @xmath49 , and @xmath50 , @xmath51 .
there exist a second - order and a third - order harmonic signals , both set to be 6% in amplitude . in the first experiment
, we test the capability of the two modelings .
the mvdr and music spectra of the quaternion- and complex - valued models are plotted in fig .
2 , where snr @xmath52 db .
it can be observed that the proposed model is able to detect all the harmonic signals , namely 50 hz ( the fundamental frequency ) , @xmath53 hz ( the second - order harmonic ) , and @xmath54150 hz ( the third - order harmonic ) , while the complex - valued model fails at the third - order harmonic frequency . in the second experiment ,
we test the accuracy of relevant algorithms
. the estimation errors ( averaged via 300 monte carlo simulation runs ) of the quaternion- and complex - valued mvdr and music algorithms are plotted in fig .
3 , where the snr value varies from 25 to 45 db . we can see that all the algorithms have similar estimation accuracy .
we have presented a quaternion - valued model as an alternative preprocessing approach to convert the three - phase signals into a single - phase system . compared with the clarke s transformation
, the proposed model can additionally detect the zero sequence voltages .
simulated results show that the proposed model can detect all - order voltage harmonics effectively , while sharing similar estimation accuracy with the complex - valued model .
m. bollen , _ understanding power quality problems : voltage sags and interruptions_. wiley - ieee press , 2000 .
m. akke , `` frequency estimation by demodulation of two complex signals , '' _ ieee transactions on power delivery _ , vol .
1 , pp . 157163 , jan .
h. j. jeon and t. g. chang , `` iterative frequency estimation based on mvdr spectrum , '' _ ieee transactions on power delivery _
2 , pp . 621630 , apr .
y. xia and d. p. mandic , `` augmented mvdr spectrum - based frequency estimation for unbalanced power systems , '' _ ieee transactions on instrumentation and measurement _ , vol .
62 , no . 7 , pp
. 19171926 , jul . 2013 .
r. o. schmidt , `` multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation , '' _ ieee transactions on antennas and propagation _ , vol .
3 , pp . 276280 , mar .
. w. m. grady and s. santoso , `` understanding power system harmonics , '' _ ieee power engineering review _ ,
811 , nov .
j. p. ward , _ quaternions and cayley numbers : algebra and applications _ , kluwer , normwell , ma , 1997 .
m. wax and t. kailath , `` detection of signals by information theoretic criteria , '' _ ieee transactions on acoustics , speech , and signal processing _
assp-33 , no .
2 , pp . 387392 , apr . 1985
. s. j. sangwine , `` fourier transforms of colour images using quaternion or hypercomplex numbers , '' _ electronics letters _ ,
19791980 , oct .
j. w. tao , `` performance analysis for interference and noise canceller based on hypercomplex and spatio - temporal - polarisation processes , '' _ iet radar sonar and navigation _ , vol . 7 , no .
3 , pp . 277286 , mar .
s. miron , n. le bihan , j. i. mars , `` quaternion - music for vector - sensor array processing , '' _ ieee transactions on signal processing _ ,
4 , pp . 12181229 , apr . | power quality control major for power delivery systems requires measurements voltage characteristics frequency measurement due to voltage sags harmonics caused by nonlinear loads three - phase power systems clarke s @xmath0 , @xmath1 transformation used preprocessing complex - valued single - phase signal from real - valued three - phase signals traditional complex - valued spectrum estimation methods applied mvdr iterative mvdr method improve resolution apply subspace methods music method zero sequence voltages cancelled in complex - valued signal not detected harmonic voltages blocked by delta transformer add up in neutral overheating transformer potential fire hazards to detect harmonics propose quaternion - valued model traditional spectrum estimation methods extended mvdr music harmonics of all orders reserved in quaternion - valued signal detected by relevant estimation methods paper review of complex - valued model in section ii quaternion - valued model proposed in section iii fourier analysis mvdr music - like estimation algorithms simulation results in section iv conclusions in section v.consider discrete - time balanced three - phase power system @xmath2 harmonic distortions @xmath3 @xmath4 amplitudes harmonic signals @xmath5 fundamental frequency sampling interval signal phase @xmath8 measurement noise three - phase signals converted to complex - valued single - phase signal via clarke s @xmath9 transformation three - phase signals mixed into @xmath10 @xmath11 merged complex - valued signal @xmath14 exploit mvdr spectrum locate frequencies given by @xmath15 hermitian - transpose operation @xmath17 covariance matrix dimension @xmath18 @xmath19 frequency sweeping vector use music spectrum expressed @xmath20 @xmath21 euclidean norm @xmath22 noise subspace eigenvectors covariance matrix @xmath17 @xmath23 smallest eigenvalues @xmath23 assumed known estimated information theory methods covariance @xmath17 updated estimated from average samples @xmath24 @xmath26 number of observations@xmath27 complex - domain harmonic signals divided two categories plus noise @xmath28 @xmath29 summation positive voltages @xmath30 negative voltages @xmath32 largest integer not greater than @xmath34 zero sequence voltages cancelled same cophasial in three voltage channels eliminated rows transformation matrix @xmath35 zero - mean vectors propose quaternion - valued approach nextconstruct quaternion - valued signal from three - phase signals @xmath36 @xmath37 three imaginary units quaternion algebra constrained by @xmath38 quaternion signal contains quaternion - domain harmonic signals three categories @xmath39 plus noise @xmath42 @xmath39 summation positive sequence voltages @xmath43\\-\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}\sqrt{3}}[(3p-2)(\omega+\phi\frac{h+2{2\imath-\jmath - k{3p-2+\jmath+k{3}}(3p-2)(\omega_s+\phi @xmath40 summation negative sequence voltages @xmath44\\+\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}\sqrt{3}}[(3p-1)\omega+\phi\frac{2\imath-\jmath - k}+\jmath+k{3}}(3p-1)(\omega_s+\phi @xmath41 summation zero sequence voltages @xmath45\sum_{p=1}{\lfloor\frac{h}{3}\rfloor}v_{3p}\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{2}\big(e{\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}3p(\omega nt_s+\phi) e^{-\frac{\imath+\jmath+k}{\sqrt{3}}3p(\omega nt_s+\phi)}\big) \end{split } \label{3p} harmonic signals reserved in quaternion - valued signal harmonic signals mapped into quaternion - valued signal @xmath46 axis fig adopt mvdr spectrum music spectrum substituting frequency sweeping vector as @xmath47^\mathrm frequencies detected spectrum are original real - domain angular frequencies or additive inverses peak detected additive inverse corresponds to positive or negative sequence voltage signal indicates angular frequency additive inverse two mirrored peaks correspond to zero sequence voltage signal indicate angular frequency additive inverse numerical examples proposed quaternion modelexperiments fundamental frequency 50 hz sampling frequency @xmath48 khz initial phase @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 second third - order harmonic signals 6% amplitude first experiment two modelings mvdr music spectra quaternion- complex - valued models plotted . 2 snr @xmath52 db proposed model all harmonic signals 50 hz @xmath53 hz complex - valued model fails third - order harmonic frequency second experiment accuracy algorithms estimation errors 300 simulation runs quaternion complex - valued mvdr music algorithms fig . 3 snr value varies 25 to 45 db algorithms similar estimation accuracy presented quaternion - valued model alternative approach convert three - phase signals single - phase system proposed model detect zero sequence voltages results model all - order voltage harmonics similar estimation accuracy complex - valued model m. bollen understanding power quality problems voltage sags interruptions wiley - ieee press 2000 m. akke frequency estimation by demodulation two complex signals ieee transactions power delivery vol . 1 pp . 157163 jan jeon chang iterative frequency estimation mvdr spectrum transactions power delivery pp 621630 xia. mandic augmented mvdr spectrum frequency estimation unbalanced power systems transactions instrumentation measurement vol . 62 no . 7 pp 19171926 2013 schmidt multiple emitter location signal parameter estimation transactions antennas propagation vol . 3 pp 276280 grady s. santoso understanding power system harmonics power engineering review 811 nov ward quaternions cayley numbers algebra applications kluwer normwell 1997 m wax t kailath detection signals information theoretic criteria transactions acoustics speech signal processing assp-33 no . 2 pp 387392 1985 sangwine fourier transforms colour images quaternion hypercomplex numbers electronics letters 19791980 tao performance analysis interference noise canceller hypercomplex spatio - temporal - polarisation processes radar sonar navigation vol . 7 no . 3 pp 277286 miron le bihanmars quaternion music vector sensor array processing transactions signal processing 4 pp 12181229 apr. | 0.49262 | 2,530 | 1,287 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,029 | results of molecular dynamics simulations of fission reactions @xmath0 and @xmath1 are presented .
dependence of the fission barriers on isomer structure of the parent cluster is analyzed .
it is demonstrated that the energy necessary for removing homothetic groups of atoms from the parent cluster is largely independent of the isomer form of the parent cluster .
importance of rearrangement of the cluster structure during the fission process is elucidated .
this rearrangement may include transition to another isomer state of the parent cluster before actual separation of the daughter fragments begins and/or forming a `` neck '' between the separating fragments .
fission of charged atomic clusters occurs when repulsive coulomb forces , arising due to the excessive charge , overcome the electronic binding energy of the cluster @xcite .
this mechanism of the cluster fission is in a great deal similar to the nuclear fission phenomena .
experimentally , multiply charged metal clusters can be observed in the mass spectra when their size exceeds the critical size of stability , which depends on the metal species and cluster charge @xcite .
we report the results of the _ ab initio _ molecular dynamics ( md ) simulations of the fission processes @xmath0 and @xmath2 .
both symmetric and asymmetric fission channels are considered .
we have investigated the parent cluster isomer dependence of the fission barrier for the reaction @xmath0 . to the best of our knowledge ,
a comparative study of fission barriers for various isomers by means of quantum chemistry methods has not been carried out before .
note that such a study is beyond the scope of simpler approaches which do not account for ionic structure of a cluster .
we found that the direct separation barrier for the reaction @xmath3 has a weak dependence on the isomeric structure of the parent cluster .
we note , however , that the groups of atoms to be removed from the parent cluster isomers must be chosen with care ; one has to identify homothetic groups of atoms in each fissioning isomer .
the weak dependence on the isomeric state of the parent @xmath4 cluster implies that the particular ionic structure of the cluster is largely insignificant for the shape and height of the fission barrier .
this is due to the fact that the maximum of fission barriers in considered cases are located at distances comparable or exceeding the sum of the resulting fragments radii . at such distances
the interaction between the fragments , apart from the coulombic repulsion , is mainly determined by the electronic properties rather than by the details of the ionic structure of the fragments .
this is an important argument for justification of the jellium model approach to the description of the fission process of multiply charged metal clusters .
we have demonstrated the importance of rearrangement of the cluster ionic structure during the fission process .
the possibility of rearrangement of the cluster structure leads to the fact that direct fission of a cluster isomer in some cases may not be the energetically optimum path for the fission reaction .
alternatively , the reaction can go through transition to another isomer state of the parent cluster .
this transition can occur in the first phase of the fission process , before separation of the fragments actually begins .
we show that this is the case for the fission of @xmath5 and @xmath6 isomers of @xmath4 cluster .
the rearrangement of ionic structure may be important also after the fragments began to separate . for @xmath1 reaction , two magic fragments @xmath7 form a metastable transitional state in which the fragments are connected by a `` neck '' .
this `` necking '' allows for significant reduction in the height of the fission barrier .
note that the similar necking phenomenon is known for the nuclear fission process @xcite . in our molecular dynamics simulations we utilize methods of density
functional theory ( dft ) . within the dft one has to solve the kohn - sham equations @xcite @xmath8 where the first term corresponds to the kinetic energy of an electron from the kohn - sham reference system
, @xmath9 describes the attraction of the @xmath10 electron to the nuclei in the cluster , @xmath11 is the electronic orbital , @xmath12 is the hartree part of the inter - electronic interaction , @xmath13 @xmath14 is the electron density , @xmath15 is the local exchange - correlation potential defined as the functional derivative of the exchange - correlation energy functional @xmath16}{\delta \rho({\bf r})},\ ] ] where the exchange - correlation energy is partitioned into two parts , referred to as _ exchange _ and _ correlation _ parts : @xmath17= e_{\rm x}(\rho ) + e_{\rm c } ( \rho).\ ] ] physically , these two terms correspond to same - spin and mixed - spin interactions , respectively . both parts are functionals of the electron density , which can be of two distinct types : either a local functional depending on the electron density @xmath18 only or a gradient - corrected functional depending on the electron density and its gradient @xmath19 . there is a variety of exchange - correlation functionals in the literature .
we have used the three - parameter becke - type gradient - corrected exchange functional with the gradient - corrected correlation functional of lee , yang , and parr ( b3lyp ) @xcite . for the explicit form of this functional we refer to the original papers @xcite .
the b3lyp functional has proved to be a reliable tool for studying the structure and properties of small metal clusters .
it provides high accuracy at comparatively low computational costs . for a discussion and a comparison with other approaches ,
see @xcite .
note that the density of the parent cluster and two daughter fragments ( including the overlapping region before scission point ) almost does not change during the fission process ( by analogy with the deformed jellium model , see @xcite for more details ) .
this means that the b3lyp method works adequately for any fragment separation distances , @xmath20 , during the fission process .
the calculations have been carried out with the use of the gaussian 98 software package @xcite .
the 6 - 311g(d ) and lanl2dz basis sets of primitive gaussian functions have been used to expand the cluster orbitals @xcite .
the 6 - 311g(d ) basis has been used for simulations involving @xmath4 cluster .
this basis set takes into account electrons from all atomic orbitals , so that the dynamics of all particles in the system is taken into account . for @xmath21 cluster
we have used more numerically efficient lanl2dz basis , for which valent atomic electrons move in an effective core potential ( see details in @xcite ) . to simulate the fission process
we start from the optimized geometry of a cluster ( for details of the geometry optimization procedure see @xcite ) and choose the atoms the resulting fragments would consist of .
the atoms chosen for a smaller fragment are shifted from their locations in the parent cluster to a certain distance .
then , the multidimensional potential energy surface , its gradient and forces with respect to the molecular coordinates are calculated .
these quantities specify the direction along the surface in which the energy decreases the most rapidly and provide information for the determination of the next step for the moving atoms . if the fragments are removed not far enough from each other then the attractive forces prevailed over the repulsive ones and the fragments stuck together forming the unified cluster again . in the opposite situation
the repulsive forces dominate and the fragments drift away from each other .
the dependence of the total energy of the system on the fragment separation distance forms the fission barrier .
the aim of our simulations is to find the fission pathway corresponding to the minimum of the fission barrier .
there are usually many stable isomers of a cluster with energies slightly exceeding the energy of the ground state isomer . in order to analyze the isomer dependence of the fission barrier in the reaction
@xmath22 we have picked two energetically low - lying isomers with the point symmetry groups @xmath5 and @xmath6 differing from the distorted @xmath23 point symmetry group of the ground state parent @xmath4 cluster .
three isomer states of the @xmath4 cluster are shown in figure [ isomers ] . cluster . from left to right : the ground state isomer of distorted @xmath24 point symmetry group ( total energy is -1622.7063 a.u . ) ; an isomer of @xmath5 point symmetry group ( total energy is -1622.6888 a.u .
, that exceeds the lowest energy state by 0.476 ev ) ; an isomer of @xmath6 point symmetry group ( total energy is -1622.6860 a.u .
, that exceeds the lowest energy state by 0.553 ev ) .
the homothetic group of three atoms marked by black color . ] in figure [ isobarriers ] we show fission barriers for separation three atoms from the @xmath5 , @xmath6 , and @xmath23 isomers of the @xmath4 cluster . in this figure zero level of energy
is chosen for each parent isomer separately and corresponds to the minimum of total energy of that isomer .
the initial distances between the centers of mass of two ( future ) fragments are finite so that the barriers do not start at the origin . ) from three isomers of @xmath4 cluster derived from molecular dynamics simulations ( direct @xmath0 fission channel ) .
the barriers plotted versus distance between the centers of mass of the fragments .
solid , dashed , and dashed - dotted lines correspond to distorted @xmath24 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 point symmetry groups isomers of the parent cluster , respectively .
energies are measured from the energy of the ground state of the corresponding isomers , i.e. we plot @xmath25 , where @xmath26 is the total energy of the system and @xmath27 are the ground energies of the @xmath24 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 isomer states of the parent @xmath4 cluster , respectively . ]
the barriers for all three channels are close .
the weak sensitivity of the fission barrier on the isomeric states of the reactants can be explained if one notices that the barrier maxima are located at distances comparable to or exceeding the sum of the resulting fragments radii , that is not far from the scission point . at such distances
the interaction between the fragments , apart from coulombic repulsion , is mainly determined by the electronic properties rather than by the details of the ionic structure of the fragments .
this is an important argument for justification of the jellium model approach to the description of the fission process of multiply charged metal clusters .
it is important to note that the barriers presented in figure [ isobarriers ] are calculated in assumption that fission occurs for the fixed ( given ) isomers .
however , since @xmath5 and @xmath6 isomers are not the lowest energy states of @xmath4 system , there could be other processes competing with fission .
one of such processes is rearrangement of the cluster structure .
rearrangement of the cluster structure during the fission process may significantly reduce the fission barrier .
such rearrangement may occur before the actual separation of the daughter fragments begins or after that .
system and schematic barriers for transitions between these states .
energies are measured from the energy of the ground @xmath24 state of the @xmath4 cluster . ]
channel derived from molecular dynamics simulations as a function of distance between the centers of mass of the fragments .
energy is measured from the energy of the ground @xmath28 state of the @xmath21 cluster .
the arrow shows position of the meta - stable transitional state , see also figure .
this results is in a good agreement with the results of the jellium model @xcite . ] . from left to right : ground state of the parent cluster ; `` necking '' between the two fragments leads to a meta stable intermediate state and significantly reduces the fission barrier height ; two @xmath7 fragments drifting away from each other . ]
fission of @xmath5 and @xmath6 isomers of @xmath4 cluster is an example of situation where rearrangement of the cluster structure takes place before the fragments start to separate . in figure
[ levels ] we show schematically the total energies of the @xmath4 @xmath24 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 isomers and barriers for the transitions between those states .
it is seen from the figure that transition to the ground ( @xmath24 ) state with subsequent fission into the @xmath29 and @xmath30 fragments , @xmath31 , ( shown by solid lines ) is preferred path for fission of both @xmath5 and @xmath6 isomers of the @xmath4 cluster and requires only about 0.2 ev for @xmath5 isomer and 0.26 ev for @xmath6 isomer .
in contrast , the direct fission process , @xmath32 , ( shown by dashed lines ) requires about 0.5 ev .
we also show the barrier for the transition between the @xmath5 and @xmath6 isomers .
another example of cluster structure rearrangement in the fission process is the @xmath1 reaction .
the fission barrier for this reaction is shown in figure [ fission18 ] .
if two fragments of the parent cluster were not allowed to adjust their ionic structure the fission barrier would be about 1 ev .
rearrangement of the cluster structure allows to reduce the fission barrier down to 0.31 ev . during the fission process
the daughter fragments start to drift away from each other and a `` neck '' forms between the fragments .
formation of the `` neck '' results in a metastable transitional state .
the geometry of this state , as well as the geometry of the parent cluster are shown in figure [ rearrangement ] . in table
[ tab ] we have summarized our results for the fission barrier heights and compared them with the results of other molecular dynamics simulations and with the predictions of the jellium model .
@lll & @xmath0 & @xmath1 + md ( this work ) & 0.49 ( distorted @xmath24 ) & 0.31 + md@xcite & 0.67 & 0.52 + md@xcite & 0.54 & + jellium model@xcite & 0.16 & 0.48 + we have investigated two aspects of charged metal cluster fission process : dependence of the fission barrier on isomer state of the parent cluster and importance of rearrangement of the cluster ionic structure during the fission process .
we found that for a consistent choice of the atoms removed from the cluster the fission barrier for the reaction @xmath0 has a weak dependence on the initial isomer structure of the parent cluster .
this implies that the particular ionic structure of the cluster is largely insignificant for the height of the fission barrier .
this is an important argument for justification of the jellium model approach to the description of the fission process of multiply charged metal clusters .
we have shown importance of rearrangement of the cluster ionic structure during the fission process .
the fission reaction can go through transition to another isomer state of the parent cluster .
this transition can occur before actual separation of the fragments begins and/or `` neck '' between the separating fragments is formed . in any case
the resulting fission barrier can be significantly lower compared to the one for the direct fission path .
the authors acknowledge support of this work by the alexander von humboldt foundation , dfg , the studienstiftung des deutschen volkes , intas , russian foundation for basic research ( grant no 03 - 02 - 16415-a ) , russian academy of sciences ( grant 44 ) and the royal society of london . | 0.000804 | 0 | 0 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. | ||
198,030 | in this article , we analyze the vertex @xmath0 with the light - cone qcd sum rules .
the strong coupling constant @xmath1 is an important parameter in evaluating the charmonium absorption cross sections in searching for the quark - gluon plasmas .
our numerical value for the @xmath1 is consistent with the prediction of the effective @xmath2 symmetry and vector meson dominance theory . + zhi - gang wang@xmath3 , zhi - bin wang@xmath4 + @xmath3 department of physics , north china electric power university , baoding 071003 , p. r. china + @xmath4 college of electrical engineering , yanshan university , qinhuangdao 066004 , p. r. china + pacs numbers : 12.38.lg ; 13.25.ft ; 14.40.lb * key words : * strong coupling constant , light - cone qcd sum rules | the suppression of @xmath5 production in relativistic heavy ion collisions maybe one of the important signatures to identify the possible phase transition to the quark - gluon plasma @xcite .
the dissociation of the @xmath5 in the quark - gluon plasma due to color screening can lead to a reduction of its production , on the other hand , the @xmath5 suppression maybe already present in the hadron - nucleus collisions .
it is necessary to know absorption of the @xmath5 by the co - mover light mesons before we can make a definitive conclusion .
the values of the @xmath5 absorption cross sections by the light hadrons are not known empirically , we have to resort to some theoretical approaches . among existing approaches , the one - meson exchange model and the effective @xmath2 theory
are typical @xcite .
the detailed knowledge about the strong coupling constants which are basic parameters in the effective lagrangian is of great importance .
furthermore , the strong coupling constants among the charmed mesons and light - mesons play an important role in understanding final - state interactions in the hadronic @xmath6 decays @xcite
. there have been many works dealing with the strong coupling constants concerning the charmed mesons , see e.g. refs.@xcite . in ref.@xcite , the authors calculate the strong coupling constant @xmath7 with the qcd sum rules , and obtain much larger value than what expected from the effective @xmath2 theory . in this article , we calculate the value of the @xmath8 with the light - cone qcd sum rules .
the light - cone qcd sum rules carry out the operator product expansion near the light - cone @xmath9 instead of the short distance @xmath10 while the non - perturbative matrix elements are parameterized by the light - cone distribution amplitudes ( which classified according to their twists ) instead of the vacuum condensates @xcite .
the article is arranged as : in section 2 , we derive the strong coupling constant @xmath1 with the light - cone qcd sum rules ; in section 3 , the numerical result and discussion ; and in section 4 , conclusion .
we study the strong coupling constant @xmath11 with the two - point correlation function @xmath12 , @xmath13 where the currents @xmath14 and @xmath15 interpolate the vector mesons @xmath16 and @xmath17 respectively , the external state @xmath18 has the four momentum @xmath19 with @xmath20 . according to the basic assumption of current - hadron duality in the qcd sum rules @xcite ,
we can insert a complete series of intermediate states with the same quantum numbers as the current operators into the correlation function to obtain the hadronic representation . after isolating the ground state contributions from the pole terms of the mesons @xmath21 , we get the following result , @xmath22 where the following weak decay constant and phenomenological lagrangian have been used , @xmath23 here @xmath24 , @xmath25 @xcite .
we carry out the operator product expansion for the correlation function @xmath26 in perturbative qcd theory , and obtain the analytical expressions at the level of quark - gluon degrees of freedom , then perform the double borel transformation and match the quark - hadron duality below the threshold @xmath27 , finally we obtain the sum rule for the strong coupling constant @xmath1 , @xmath28-\exp\left[- \frac{s^0_{\rho}}{m^2 } \right ] \right\ } \nonumber\\ & & + \exp\left[- \frac{m_c^2+u_0(1-u_0)m_{\rho}^2}{m^2 } \right]\left\ { \left[f_{\rho}^\perp - f_{\rho}\frac{m_u+m_d}{m_{\rho}}\right]m_c m_{\rho}^2 h_{||}^{(s)}(u_0 ) \right.\nonumber\\ & & \left.-\frac{f_{\rho } m_{\rho}^3a(u_0)}{4 } \left[1 + \frac{m_c^2}{m^2}\right ] - \frac{2f_{\rho}m_c^2 m_{\rho}^3}{m^2 } \int_0^{u_0 } d\tau \int_0^\tau dt c(t)\right\ } \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath29 here we have neglected the contributions from the gluons , the contributions proportional to @xmath30 can give rise to three - particle ( and four - particle ) meson distribution amplitudes with a gluon ( and quark - antiquark pair ) , their corrections are always suppressed by the large borel parameter and will not exceed @xmath31 , for examples , one can consult the last two articles of ref.@xcite . in calculation , the two - particle @xmath18 meson light - cone distribution amplitudes up to twist-4 have been used , for explicit expressions , one can consult ref.@xcite . due to the special tensor structure @xmath32
, some two - particle twist-4 light - cone distribution amplitudes have no contributions .
the parameters in the light - cone distribution amplitudes are scale dependent , in this article , we take @xmath33 . as the dominating contribution ( about @xmath34 )
comes from the two - particle twist-2 term involving the @xmath35 , for other terms , the continuum subtractions will not affect the result remarkably , we can neglect the subtractions . in some cases ,
the contributions from the two - particle twist-3 light - cone distribution amplitudes are very large ( or dominating ) @xcite , they depend heavily on the currents we choose to interpolate the mesons .
the input parameters are taken as @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40 , @xmath41 , @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 , @xmath49 , @xmath50 , @xmath51 , @xmath52 , @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 and @xmath56 @xcite .
the central value of the decay constant @xmath57 from lattice simulation is about @xmath58 @xcite . in this article
, we take the value @xmath59 from the two - point qcd sum rules without perturbative @xmath60 corrections for consistency .
the duality threshold parameter @xmath27 is chosen to be @xmath61 , the numerical ( central ) value of @xmath27 is taken from the qcd sum rules for the mass of the @xmath62 @xcite .
the borel parameters are chosen as @xmath63 and @xmath64 , in those regions , the value of the @xmath1 is rather stable , the uncertainty from the borel parameter is very small , less than @xmath65 . in the limit of large borel parameter @xmath66 ,
the strong coupling constant @xmath1 takes up the following behavior , @xmath67 it is not unexpected , the contribution from the twist-2 light - cone distribution amplitude @xmath35 is greatly enhanced by the large borel parameter @xmath66 , its contribution is dominating , about @xmath34 , ( large ) uncertainties of the relevant parameters presented in above equation have significant impact on the numerical result .
the main uncertainties come from the two parameters @xmath57 and @xmath68 , variations of the two parameters can lead to large uncertainties , about @xmath69 . taking into account all the uncertainties ,
finally we obtain the numerical value for the strong coupling constant @xmath1 , which is shown in fig.1 , @xmath70 if we take the replacement @xmath71 \rightarrow \exp\left[- \frac{m_c^2+u_0(1-u_0)m_{\rho}^2}{m^2 } \right]-\exp\left[- \frac{s^0_{\rho}}{m^2 } \right ] $ ] to subtract the continuum contributions of the terms besides the twist-2 light - cone distribution amplitude , the central value @xmath72 will decrease about @xmath65 .
comparing with the values from the effective @xmath2 symmetry and vector meson dominance theory , @xmath73 @xcite , our numerical value @xmath74 is much smaller . in the vector meson dominance theory , @xmath75 , the contributions from the radial excited states @xmath76 , @xmath77 , @xmath78 , @xmath79
are neglected .
we can make a crude estimation with the simple replacement @xmath80 to take into account the contribution from the @xmath76 , @xmath81 , our numerical result is reasonable , the @xmath2 symmetry breaking effect for the strong coupling constants is small . in ref.@xcite ,
the authors introduce some functions to parameterize the form - factor for small spacelike @xmath82 , then extrapolate to the mass shell , much larger value is obtained , @xmath83 . although the model functions have solid theoretical foundation at large @xmath82 , extrapolation to the mass shell may have good or bad behaviors , which correspond to the systematic errors .
it is not unexpected that the values from the qcd sum rules and light - cone qcd sum rules are different . with the borel parameter @xmath66 .
in this article , we analyze the vertex @xmath0 with the light - cone qcd sum rules .
the strong coupling constant @xmath1 is an important parameter in evaluating the charmonium absorption cross sections in searching for the quark - gluon plasmas .
our numerical value for the @xmath1 is consistent with the prediction of the effective @xmath2 symmetry and vector meson dominance theory .
this work is supported by national natural science foundation , grant number 10405009 , 10775051 , and program for new century excellent talents in university , grant number ncet-07 - 0282 , and key program foundation of ncepu .
s. g. matinyan , b. muller , phys . rev .
* c58 * ( 1998 ) 2994 ; k. l. haglin , phys . rev .
* c61 * ( 2000 ) 031902 ; z. w. lin , c. m. ko , phys . rev .
* c62 * ( 2000 ) 034903 ; a. sibirtsev , k. tsushima , a. w. thomas , phys . rev .
* c63 * ( 2001 ) 044906 .
f. s. navarra , m. nielsen , m. e. bracco , phys .rev . *
d65 * ( 2002 ) 037502 ; z. h. li , t. huang , j. z. sun , z. h. dai , phys . rev .
* d65 * ( 2002 ) 076005 ; m. e. bracco , m. chiapparini , f. s. navarra , m. nielsen , phys . lett .
* b605 * ( 2005 ) 326 .
i. i. balitsky , v. m. braun and a. v. kolesnichenko , nucl . phys .
* b312 * ( 1989 ) 509 ; v. l. chernyak and i. r. zhitnitsky , nucl . phys . *
b345 * ( 1990 ) 137 ; v. m. braun and i. e. filyanov , z. phys .
* c44 * ( 1989 ) 157 ; v. m. braun and i. e. filyanov , z. phys .
* c48 * ( 1990 ) 239 .
p. ball , v. m. braun , nucl .
* b543 * ( 1999 ) 201 ; p. ball , v. m. braun , phys .
* d54 * ( 1996 ) 2182 ; p. ball , v. m. braun , y. koike , k. tanaka , nucl .
* b529 * ( 1998 ) 323 ; p. ball , g. w. jones , r. zwicky , phys . rev .
* d75 * ( 2007 ) 054004 ; p. ball , g. w. jones , jhep * 0703 * ( 2007 ) 069 . | suppression @xmath5 production in heavy ion collisions phase transition to quark - gluon plasma dissociation @xmath5 in due to color screening reduction production suppression in hadron - nucleus collisions necessary to know absorption @xmath5 by co - mover light mesons before definitive conclusion values @xmath5 absorption by light hadrons not known theoretical approaches one - meson exchange model effective @xmath2 theory typical detailed knowledge strong coupling constants parameters lagrangian importance strong coupling constants among charmed mesons light - mesons final - state interactions in hadronic @xmath6 decays works strong coupling constants. authors calculate strong coupling constant @xmath7 with qcd sum rules obtain larger value than effective @xmath2 theory calculate value @xmath8 with light - cone qcd sum rules light - cone qcd sum rules carry operator product expansion near light - cone @xmath9 instead short distance non - perturbative matrix elements parameterized by light - cone distribution amplitudes vacuumarticle arranged section 2 coupling constant @xmath1 light - cone qcd sum rules section 3 numerical result discussion section 4 conclusion study coupling constant @xmath11 two - point correlation function @xmath12 currents @xmath14 interpolate vector mesons external state @xmath18 momentum @xmath19 @xmath20 current - hadron duality qcd sum rules insert intermediate states same quantum numbers current operators correlation function hadronic representation isolating ground state contributions pole terms mesons @xmath21 result @xmath22 weak decay constant phenomenological lagrangian used @xmath23 @xmath25operator product expansion correlation function @xmath26 perturbative qcd theory obtain analytical expressions quark - gluon degrees freedom perform double borel transformation match quark - hadron duality threshold @xmath27 obtain sum rule strong coupling constant @xmath1 @xmath28-\left\frac{s^0_{\rho}}{m^2{m_c^2+u_0(1_{\rho}^2}{m^2{\rho}{\rho{m_u+m_d}\rho}}{\rho}^2^{(s)}(u_0\frac{f_{\rho } m}^3a(u_0)}{4\left[1\frac{m_c^2}{m^2}\frac{2f_{\rho}m_c^2 m{\rho}^3}{m^2 }\int_0^{u_0 } d\tau^\tau(t)\right{aligned} @xmath29 neglected contributions gluons contributions @xmath30 three - four - particle meson distribution amplitudes gluon quark - antiquark pair corrections suppressed by large borel parameter not exceed @xmath31 consult articles ref.@xcite two - particle @xmath18 meson light - cone distribution amplitudes up to twist-4 used ref.@xcite special tensor structure @xmath32 two - particle twist-4 light - cone amplitudes no contributions parameters scale dependent @xmath33 dominating contribution @xmath34 from two - particle twist-2 term @xmath35 continuum subtractions affect result neglect contributions two - particle twist-3 light - cone distribution amplitudes large depend on currentsinput parameters @xmath36 @xcite central value of decay constant @xmath57 from lattice simulation about @xmath58 @xcite value @xmath59 from two - point qcd sum rules without perturbative @xmath60 corrections for consistency duality threshold parameter @xmath27 @xmath61 numerical central value of @xmath27 from qcd sum rules for mass @xmath62 @xcite borel parameters @xmath63 @xmath64 value @xmath1 stable uncertainty from borel parameter small less than @xmath65 in limit of large borel parameter @xmath66 strong coupling constant @xmath1 behavior @xmath67 unexpected contribution from twist-2 light - cone distribution amplitude @xmath35 enhanced by large borel parameter @xmath66 contribution dominating about @xmath34 large ) uncertainties of parameters on numerical result main uncertainties from @xmath57 and @xmath68 variations lead to large uncertainties about @xmath69 uncertainties obtain numerical value for strong coupling constant @xmath1 shown in fig.1 @xmath70 replacement @xmath71 subtract continuum contributions terms twist-2 light - cone distribution amplitude central value @xmath72 decrease @xmath65 values @xmath2 symmetry vector meson dominance theory @xmath73 numerical value @xmath74 smaller vector meson dominance theory contributions from radial excited states @xmath76 @xmath77 neglected crude estimation with replacement @xmath80 contribution @xmath76 @xmath81 numerical result reasonable @xmath2 symmetry breaking effect for strong coupling constants small authors introduce functions parameterize form - factor for small spacelike @xmath82 extrapolate to mass shell larger value obtained @xmath83 model functions theoretical foundation extrapolation mass shell bad behaviors systematic errors values from qcd sum rules light - cone qcd sum rules different borel parameter @xmath66 analyze vertex @xmath0 with light - cone qcd sum rulesstrong coupling constant @xmath1 important charmonium absorption cross sections quark - gluon plasmas numerical value @xmath1 consistent @xmath2 symmetry vector meson dominance theory work supported national natural science foundation grant 10405009 10775051 program new century excellent talents university grant ncet-07 - 0282 key program foundation ncepu. matinyan muller phys . rev c58 1998 ) 2994 haglin rev c61 2000 ) 031902 z w. lin m. ko c62 2000 ) 034903 sibirtsev tsushima thomas phys rev c63 2001 ) 044906 f. navarra nielsen bracco d65 2002 ) 037502 z h. li t huang sun h. dai d65 2002 ) 076005. bracco chiapparini navarra nielsen phys b605 2005 ) 326 balitsky . braun. kolesnichenko phys b312 ( 1989 ) 509 v l. chernyak zhitnitsky nucl b345 1990 ) 137. braun filyanov physc44 1989 ) 157 v. m braun filyanov phys c48 1990 ) 239 p. ball braun nucl b543 1999 ) 201 p. ball braun phys d54 1996 ) 2182 p. ball braun koike tanaka nucl b529 1998 ) 323 p. ball w jones zwicky d75 2007 ) 054004 p. ball w jones 0703 2007 ) 069 | 0.492122 | 2,773 | 1,433 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,031 | we consider equilibrium level occupation numbers in a fermi gas with a fixed number of particles , @xmath0 , and finite level spacing . using the method of generating functions and the cumulant expansion
we derive a recurrence relation for canonical partition function and an explicit formula for occupation numbers in terms of single - particle partition function at @xmath0 different temperatures .
we apply this result to a model with equidistant non - degenerate spectrum and obtain close - form expressions in terms of @xmath1-polynomials and rogers - ramanujan partial theta function .
deviations from the standard fermi - dirac distribution can be interpreted in terms of a gap in the chemical potential between the particle and the hole excitations with additional correlations at temperatures comparable to the level spacing . | applications of statistical mechanics to fermion systems with discrete spectrum , such as semiconductor quantum dots @xcite , naturally involve single - particle averages in statistical ensembles with a fixed number of particles .
in particular , the kinetic theory of tunneling @xcite through quantum dots with fast intra - dot electron relaxation involves average level occupation number , @xmath2 in a gibbs distribution of @xmath0 independent fermions populating a set of single - particle energy levels @xmath3 ( enumerated by @xmath4 ) . here
@xmath5 is the canonical partition function @xmath6 and @xmath7 is the inverse thermodynamic temperature . for fermions , occupation numbers
@xmath8 in the sum ( [ eq : zdef ] ) take values @xmath9 and @xmath10 .
the behavior of @xmath11 is simple in two extreme limits of the typical level @xmath12 . for @xmath13 and large @xmath0 ,
( [ eq : avdef])-([eq : zdef ] ) reduce to the standard fermi - dirac distribution , @xmath14 here @xmath15 is the chemical potential determined by the normalization condition @xmath16 . in the low temperature limit , @xmath17 , most of the statistical weight in eq .
( [ eq : zdef ] ) is in the ground state ( defined as @xmath18 for @xmath19 and @xmath20 otherwise ) . in this case
it is common @xcite to take only one excited state into account resulting in a two - state gibbs distribution which is equivalent to eq .
( [ eq : fd ] ) for @xmath21 with @xmath22 and @xmath23 @xcite .
for finite @xmath24 , the average occupation number @xmath25 deviates from eq .
( [ eq : fd ] ) in a non - universal way which depends on the details of the energy spectrum @xcite .
exact analytical investigation of this regime is complicated by the combinatorial explosion in the number of levels with comparable statistical weights .
particle number projection technique based on fourier extraction @xcite gives an exact closed - form formula for @xmath26 ( see eq .
( 140 ) of @xcite ) that scales quadratically with the number of levels ; however , its potential for analytical investigation appears to be limited due to the additional sum over the fourier variable . in the paper
we address the problem of exact evaluation of canonical occupation numbers @xmath26 by deriving a general formula that scales linearly in the number of levels and quadratically in the number of particles , eqs .
( [ eq : znmain ] ) and ( [ eq : occumain ] ) below .
the energy spectrum @xmath27 enters the formula only in terms of the single - particle partition function @xmath28 computed at @xmath0 different temperatures .
we apply this general result to equidistant spectrum , @xmath29 , and derive an exact formula for @xmath26 in terms of polynomials in @xmath30 , eq .
( [ eq : exactgfd ] ) . in the limit of degenerate fermi gas , @xmath31 ,
these polynomials converge to partial theta function @xcite which is involved in a number of combinatorial proofs @xcite of ramanujan s identities @xcite .
the exact result for the equidistant spectrum can be approximated well by tailoring _
two _ standard fermi - dirac distributions ( [ eq : fd ] ) with different chemical potentials for holes and for particles , @xmath32 and @xmath33 , respectively . in the high- and
the low - temperature limits , this approximation converges to the asymptotically exact fermi - dirac and two - state gibbs distributions , respectively . at intermediate temperatures ,
@xmath34 , particle - hole correlation effects due to fixed @xmath0 result in finite deviations from the exact solution .
grand canonical partition function @xmath35 serves as a generating function for the canonical partition functions @xmath5 if expanded power series of @xmath36 , @xmath37 @xmath38 is most conveniently calculated via its logarithm @xcite , @xmath39 where @xmath40 , and @xmath41 is the canonical partition function of a _ single _ particle .
relation between @xmath42 and @xmath43 is the same as between the raw moments and the cumulants of a univariate probability distribution and is given by the complete bell polynomials @xcite , @xmath44 the latter satisfy a recurrence relation @xcite , @xmath45 which translates into @xmath46 \ , . % \frac{\kappa_n}{n ! } + \sum_{m=0}^{n-1 } \left ( \begin{array}{c}\ ! n\!-\!1 \\ m\!-\!1 \end{array } \ !
\right ) \kappa_m \frac{(n - m)!}{n ! }
z_{n - m } = % \frac{\kappa_n}{n ! } + \sum_{m=0}^{n-1 } \frac{\kappa_m z_{n - m}}{n ( m\!-\!1)!}\ ] ] we set @xmath47 identically . combining eqs .
( [ eq : avdef ] ) , ( [ eq : plainy ] ) and ( [ eq : logy ] ) gives the generating function for the occupation numbers : @xmath48 expanding the r.h.s . in powers
series in @xmath49 gives @xmath50\ ] ] equations ( [ eq : znmain ] ) and ( [ eq : occumain ] ) constitute our main general result .
for @xmath51 , the grand canonical partition function ( [ eq : logy ] ) can be expressed by an infinite product , @xmath52 where @xmath30 and @xmath53 is the @xmath1-shifted factorial @xcite .
using @xmath1-analog binomial theorem of euler ( @xcite , formula 17.2.35 ) we can get the partition function directly from eq .
( [ eq : plainy ] ) , @xmath54 applying eq .
( [ eq : occumain ] ) , and transforming @xmath1-shifted factorials ( @xcite , formula 17.2.13 ) , one gets @xmath55 equation ( [ eq : gfdpoly1 ] ) defines occupation numbers for @xmath0 fermions populating equidistant levels at equilibrium .
it is clear from the explicit form ( [ eq : pdef ] ) that @xmath56 is a laurent polynomial ( the product contains negative powers of @xmath1 if @xmath57 ) .
however , since @xmath58 for @xmath59 by definition ( [ eq : avdef ] ) , the negative powers of @xmath1 must cancel , thus we conclude that @xmath56 is always an ordinary polynomial in @xmath1 for @xmath60 , @xmath61 .
this cancelation is not trivial and deems further mathematical investigation @xcite .
a number of recurrence formulas can be derived for @xmath56 @xcite , including a symmetry relation @xmath62 using ( [ eq : pdef ] ) in the r.h.s . of ( [ eq : symmetry ] )
gives a sum of products with no negative powers of @xmath1 at @xmath57 .
if @xmath63 then the fermi gas is degenerate @xcite and the limit of @xmath64 is appropriate . for @xmath65 , and @xmath66 the polynomial sum in eq .
( [ eq : pdef ] ) becomes a geometric series which gives @xmath67 where @xmath68 is known as partial theta function is an instance of _ false theta series _
@xcite in the sense of l .j .
rogrers @xcite . ]
the partial theta function is famous for a number of identities discovered by ramanujan in his lost notebook @xcite .
these identities have been studied extensively , including some recent proofs by combinatorial methods @xcite . using the symmetry relation ( [ eq : symmetry ] ) for @xmath57 ,
gives the particle - hole complementary result : @xmath69 . in terms of level energies
@xmath70 , the occupation numbers in a canonical degenerate fermi gas with constant levels spacing @xmath12 can be written as @xmath71 where @xmath72 and @xmath73.the function defined in eq .
( [ eq : piecwiseform ] ) can be considered a @xmath1-analog @xcite of the standard fermi - dirac distribution ( [ eq : fd ] ) since @xmath74 . and @xmath75 .
crosses mark the exact values , thick ( blue ) continuous line shows the @xmath1-analog of fermi - dirac distribution , eq .
( [ eq : piecwiseform ] ) , thin continuous line substitution @xmath76 in eq .
( [ eq : piecwiseform ] ) , and short - dashed line single fermi - dirac distribution , eq .
( [ eq : fd ] ) .
the long - dashed lines between @xmath77 and @xmath78 are extrapolations of the corresponding functions into the gap @xmath79 .
[ fig : fig1],scaledwidth=70.0% ] equation ( [ eq : piecwiseform ] ) expresses two essential deviations of canonical occupation numbers from fermi - dirac distribution .
firstly , the @xmath1-analog @xmath80 is different from @xmath81 .
an approximation of substituting @xmath76 in eq .
( [ eq : piecwiseform ] ) becomes exact both for @xmath82 and for @xmath83 .
numerically , we find maximal absolute deviation @xmath84 of @xmath85 reached for @xmath86 at @xmath87 .
for the two levels closest to the gap , @xmath21 approximating @xmath76 gives @xmath88 $ ] which is equivalent to two - state gibbs approximation @xcite .
a comparison between the exact result ( [ eq : exactgfd ] ) , the large-@xmath0 limit ( [ eq : piecwiseform ] ) and a single fermi - dirac distribution is shown in fig .
[ fig : fig1 ] for @xmath89 and @xmath75 . secondly , barring the difference between @xmath80 and @xmath81 , eq .
( [ eq : piecwiseform ] ) can be seen as a combination of two fermi - dirac distributions with different chemical potentials for particles , @xmath90 , and for holes , @xmath91 , respectively .
this is precisely what is to be expected if one considers particle and hole excitations from the ground state as two uncorrelated microcanonical ensembles .
in this view , the moderate difference in the functional dependence between @xmath92 and @xmath93 results from correlation between a particle and a hole created in a single pair - excitation act . note that the difference @xmath94 can not be ignored even as @xmath95 and @xmath96 , thus using a single fermi - dirac distribution , eq .
( [ eq : fd ] ) , necessarily fails for finite @xmath12 and low temperature .
the author is grateful to carlo beenakker , bruce c. berndt , jan mangaldan , juris smotrovs , and michael somos for discussions .
this research has been supported by esf project no .
2009/0216/1dp/1.1.1.2.0/09/apia / viaa/044 .
10 url # 1#1urlprefix[2][]#2 kouwenhoven l p , austing d g and tarucha s 2001 _ rep .
phys . _ * 64 * 701 | statistical mechanics to fermion systems semiconductor quantum dots @xcite involve single - particle averages fixed particles kinetic theory tunneling @xcite through quantum dots fast - electron relaxation involves average level occupation number @xmath2 gibbs distribution @xmath0 independent fermions single - particle energy levels @xmath3 @xmath5 canonical partition function @xmath6 @xmath7 inverse thermodynamic temperature fermions occupation numbers @xmath8 take values @xmath9 @xmath10 behavior @xmath11 simple in extreme limits typical level @xmath12 @xmath13 and @xmath0 eq avdef-[eq zdef reduce to standard fermi - dirac distribution @xmath15 chemical potential normalization condition @xmath16 low temperature limit @xmath17 statistical weight in eq in ground state @xmath18 @xcite one excited state two - state gibbs distribution equivalent to eq for @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 finite @xmath24 average occupation number @xmath25 deviates from eq on energy spectrum @xcite investigation complicated by combinatorial explosion in number levels comparable weightsparticle number projection technique fourier extraction @xcite gives exact closed - form formula for @xmath26 scales quadratically with levels potential analytical investigation limited additional sum fourier variable address exact evaluation canonical occupation numbers @xmath26 general formula scales linearly levels quadratically particles energy spectrum @xmath27 enters formula single - particle partition function at different temperatures apply result to equidistant spectrum @xmath29 derive exact formula for @xmath26 polynomials in @xmath30 limit degenerate fermi gas @xmath31 polynomials converge to partial theta function @xcite involved combinatorial proofs exact result equidistant spectrum approximated by tailoring standard fermi - dirac distributions with different chemical potentials for holes particles @xmath32 @xmath33 high- low - temperature limits approximation converges to exact fermi - dirac two - state gibbs distributions at intermediate temperatures @xmath34 particle - hole correlation effects result in finite deviations from exact solutioncanonical partition function @xmath35 generating for canonical partition functions @xmath5 expanded power series of @xmath36 @xmath38 calculated via logarithm @xcite @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 canonical partition function of single particle relation between @xmath42 and @xmath43 same as raw moments cumulants univariate probability distribution given by complete bell polynomials @xcite @xmath44 satisfy recurrence relation @xmath45 translates into @xmath46\frac{\kappa_n}{n\sum_{m=0}^{n-1 }\left\begin{array{array\kappa_m\frac{(n - m z_{n - m } =_{m=0^{n-1 set @xmath47 combining eqs avdef plainy logy ] generating function for occupation numbers @xmath48 expanding r.h.s powers series @xmath49 gives @xmath50 equations eq : znmain eq : occumain constitute main general result@xmath51 partition function logy expressed infinite product @xmath52 @xmath30 @xmath53 @xmath1-shifted factorial @xcite @xmath1-analog binomial theorem of euler formula 17.2.35 ) partition function from eq . @xmath54 transforming @xmath1-shifted factorials formula 17.2.13 @xmath55 equation eq : gfdpoly1 defines occupation numbers @xmath0 fermions populating equidistant levels equilibrium @xmath56 laurent polynomial product contains negative powers of @xmath1 @xmath57 ) @xmath58 @xmath59 negative powers @xmath1 cancel @xmath56 ordinary polynomial @xmath1 @xmath60 @xmath61 cancelation not trivial further mathematical investigation recurrence formulas derived for @xmath56 @xcite symmetry relation @xmath62 eq : pdef ] ) sum of products no negative powers @xmath1 at @xmath57 @xmath63 fermi gas degenerate @xcite limit @xmath64 appropriate @xmath65 @xmath66 polynomial sum in eq .eq : pdef ] geometric series @xmath67 @xmath68 partial theta function false theta series rogrers partial theta function famous for identities discovered by ramanujan lost notebook identities studied extensively recent proofs combinatorial methods symmetry relation @xmath57 gives particle - hole complementary result @xmath69 level energies @xmath70 numbers degenerate fermi gas constant levels spacing @xmath12 written as @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 function defined eq piecwiseform @xmath1-analog standard fermi - dirac distribution @xmath74 @xmath75 crosses mark exact values thick continuous line shows @xmath1-analog fermi - dirac distribution thin continuous line substitution @xmath76 short - dashed line single fermi - dirac distribution long - dashed lines between @xmath77 @xmath78 extrapolations of functions into gap @xmath79 equation piecwiseform expresses two deviations of occupation numbers from fermi - dirac distribution @xmath1-analog @xmath80 different from @xmath81substituting @xmath76 in becomes exact for @xmath82 and @xmath83 maximal deviation @xmath84 of @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath21 @xmath76 gives @xmath88 equivalent to two - state gibbs approximation comparison between exact result large-@xmath0 limit single fermi - dirac distribution shown in fig . for @xmath89 @xmath75 barring difference between @xmath80 @xmath81 eq piecwiseform combination of two fermi - dirac distributions different chemical potentials for particles @xmath90 holes @xmath91 particle hole excitations uncorrelated ensembles moderate difference functional dependence between @xmath92 and @xmath93 results from correlation between particle hole single pair - excitation act difference @xmath94 ignored @xmath95 @xmath96 single fermi - dirac distribution fails for finite @xmath12 low temperature author grateful to carlo beenakker bruce c. berndt jan mangaldan juris smotrovs michael somos research supported by esf project 2009/0216/1dp/1.1.1.2.0/09/apiaurl kouwenhoven austing d g tarucha s 2001 rep phys. 64 701 | 0.42676 | 2,591 | 1,364 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,033 | it is shown that , contrary to an existing claim , the near equality between the lifetime of the sun and the timescale of biological evolution on earth does not necessarily imply that extraterrestrial civilizations are exceedingly rare .
furthermore , on the basis of simple assumptions it is demonstrated that a near equality between these two timescales may be the most probable relation .
a calculation of the cosmic history of carbon production which is based on the recently determined history of the star formation rate suggests that the most likely time for intelligent civilizations to emerge in the universe , was when the universe was already older then about 10 billion years ( for an assumed current age of about 13 billion years ) . | with the recent discovery of several extra - solar planets ( and brown dwarfs ) around solar type stars ( e.g. mayor & queloz 1995 ; buter & marcy 1996 ; basri , marcy & graham 1996 ) the question of the potential existence of extraterrestrial `` intelligent '' civilizations has become more intriguing than ever .
while this topic has been the subject of extensive speculations and many ill - defined ( often by necessity ) probability estimates , at least one study ( carter 1983 ) has examined it from a more global , statistical perspective .
that study concluded , on the basis of the near equality between the timescale of biological evolution on earth , @xmath0 , and the lifetime of the sun , @xmath1 , that extraterrestrial civilizations are exceedingly rare , even if conditions favorable for the development of life are relatively common .
the conclusion on the rarity of extraterrestrial intelligent civilizations ( carter 1983 ; and see also barrow & tipler 1986 ) was based on one crucial _
assumption _ and one _ observation_. the _ assumption _ is that the timescale of biological evolution on a given planet , @xmath0 , and the lifetime of the central star , @xmath2 , are a priori entirely independent quantities . put differently
, this assumes that intelligent life forms at some random time with respect to the main sequence lifetime of the star .
observation _ is that in the earth - sun system @xmath3 ( to within a factor 2 ; for definiteness i will take from now on @xmath0 to represent the timescale for the appearance of land life ) . for completeness
, i will reproduce here the argument briefly . _
if _ @xmath0 and @xmath2 are indeed independent quantities , then most probably either @xmath4 or @xmath5 ( the set of @xmath3 is of very small measure for two independent quantities ) .
if , however , @xmath6 _ generally _ , then it is very difficult to understand why in the first system found to exhibit an intelligent civilization ( the earth - sun system ) , it was found that @xmath3 .
if , on the other hand , _ generally _ @xmath7 , then it is clear that the first system found to contain an intelligent civilization is likely to have @xmath8 ( since for @xmath7 a civilization would not have developed ) .
thus , according to this argument , one has to conclude that typically @xmath9 , namely , that _ generally _ intelligent civilizations will not develop , and that the earth is the extremely rare exception .
what i intend first to show in the present work is that this conclusion is at best premature , by demonstrating that not only that @xmath0 and @xmath2 may not be independent , but also that @xmath10 may in fact be the _ most probable _ value for this ratio .
this is done in 2 .
i use the recently determined cosmic star formation history to estimate the most likely time for intelligent civilizations to emerge in the universe .
superficially it appears that @xmath0 ( which is determined mainly by biochemical reactions and evolution of species ) and @xmath2 ( which is determined by nuclear burning reactions ) should be independent .
it suffices to note , however , that light energy ( from the central star ) exceeds by 23 orders of magnitude all other sources of energy that can drive chemical evolution in the prebiotic environment ( e.g. deamer 1997 ) , to realize that @xmath0 may in fact depend on @xmath2 ( note that the statement that intelligent life will not develop for @xmath7 also constitutes a qualitative dependence ) .
below i identify a specific physical process that can , in principle at least , relate the two timescales .
first i would like however to point out the following _ general _ property .
imagine that we find that the ratio @xmath11 can be described by some function of the form @xmath12 , and that we further find that the function @xmath13 is monotonically increasing ( at least for the narrow range of values of @xmath2 corresponding to stars which allow the development of life , see below ) .
this situation is shown schematically in fig . 1 .
in such a case , since for a salpeter initial mass function ( salpeter 1955 ) we have that the distribution of stellar lifetimes behaves like @xmath14 ( since for main sequence stars , @xmath15 e.g.allen 1973 ) , it is immediately clear from fig . 1 , that it is _ most probable _ that in the first place we encounter an intelligent civilization , we will find that @xmath10 ( since the number of stars increases as we move to the right in the diagram ) . therefore , if we can show that some processes are likely to produce a monotonically increasing ( @xmath2 ; @xmath11 ) relation , then the fact that @xmath3 in the earth - sun system will find a natural explanation , and it will not have any implications for the frequency of extraterrestrial civilizations .
i should note though that if the breadth of the ` band ' in fig .
1 becomes extremely large , this is essentially equivalent to no @xmath0@xmath2 relation and carter s argument is recovered .
i will now give a simple example of how a @xmath0@xmath2 relation may arise .
i should emphasize that this is not meant to be understood as a realistic model , but merely to demonstrate that such a relation _
could _ exist .
nucleic acid absorption of uv radiation peaks between @xmath16 and @xmath17 and that of proteins between @xmath17 and @xmath18(e.g .
davidson 1960 ; sagan 1961 ; caspersson 1950 ) .
absorption in these bands is highly lethal to all known forms of cell activity ( e.g. berkner 1952 ) .
of all the potential constituents of a planet s atmosphere only o@xmath19 absorbs efficiently in the 20003000 range ( e.g. watanabe , zelikoff & inn 1958 ) .
it has in fact been suggested that the appearance of land life has to await the build - up of a sufficient layer of protective ozone ( berkner & marshall 1965 ; hart 1978 ) .
thus , it is important to understand the origin and evolution of oxygen in planetary atmospheres . while clearly only a limited knowledge of all the processes involved exists ( and even that only from the earth s atmosphere ) , this will suffice for the purposes of the present example .
two main phases can be identified in the rise of oxygen in planetary atmospheres ( berkner & marshall 1965 ; hart 1978 ; levine , hays & walker 1979 ; canuto et al .
in the first ( which on earth lasted @xmath20 yr ) , oxygen is released from the photochemical dissociation of water vapor ( this led on earth probably to oxygen levels of @xmath21 of the present atmospheric level ( p.a.l . ) ) . in the second phase ( which on earth lasted @xmath22 yr ) , the amounts of o@xmath23 and o@xmath19 reach levels @xmath24 p.a.l .
, sufficient to shadow the land from lethal uv to allow the spread of life to dry land ( the uv extinction is normally expressed as @xmath25 , where @xmath26 is the impinging intensity , @xmath27 is the absorption coefficient and @xmath28 is the path length in the atmosphere ) . the important point to note ( berkner &
marshall 1965 ; hart 1978 ) is that the duration of the first phase is inversely proportional to the intensity of the radiation in the range 10002000 ( significant peaks in h@xmath23o absorption exist in the 11001300 and 16001800 ranges ) .
thus , for a given planetary size and orbit , the timescale for the development of shielding ( which we identify approximately with @xmath0 ) is dependent on the stellar spectral type , and therefore on @xmath2
. for typical main sequence star relations , @xmath29 ( with @xmath30 in the range 0.61 , for spectral types f5k5 , see below ) , and empirical fractions of the radiation emitted in the 10002000range ( stecker 1970 ; carruthers 1971 ) , a simple calculation ( e.g. livio & kopelman 1990 ) leads to an approximate relation of the form @xmath31 = 4.6 in clearly with the existence of a relation like ( 1 ) ( which is monotonically increasing ) , the highest probability is to find @xmath3 , and hence the near equality of these two timescales in the earth - sun system can not be taken to imply that extraterrestrial civilizations are rare .
i should note again that the detailed evolution of the atmosphere is surely more complicated than a simple dependence on the intensity of uv photons .
in particular , it may be that the different phases of the evolution have different dependences on the properties of the central star .
the important point , however , is that , as the above example shows , the _ existence _ of a @xmath0@xmath2 relation is not implausible , and that @xmath32 ) _ could _ increase faster than linearly .
given that extraterrestrial `` intelligent '' civilizations may not be exceedingly rare after all , one may ask what is a likely time in the history of the universe for such civilizations to emerge .
i will restrict the discussion now to carbon - based civilizations . assuming a principle of ` mediocrity '
, one would expect the emergence to coincide perhaps with the peak in the carbon production rate .
the main contributors of carbon to the interstellar medium are intermediate mass stars ( wood 1981 ; yungelson , tutukov & livio 1993 ) through the asymptotic giant branch ( agb ) and planetary nebulae ( pne ) phases .
recent progress has been made in the understanding of the cosmic history of the star formation rate ( sfr ) ( e.g. madau et al.1996 ; lilly et al .
1996 ; madau , pozzetti & dickinson 1997 ) .
assuming for simplicity that all the galaxies follow the same sfr history and stellar evolution processes , we can calculate the rate of formation of planetary nebulae ( and hence the rate of carbon production ) as a function of redshift . for this purpose a population synthesis code which follows the evolution of all the stars ( assumed to be mainly in binaries ) , including all episodes of mass exchange , common envelope phases etc .
, has been used ( see yungelson , tutukov & livio 1993 ; yungelson et al .
1996 for details of the code ; i am grateful to lev yungelson for carrying out the simulations ) . in fig . 2 , the assumed sfr as a function of redshift ( taken as an approximation to the results in madau et al . 1996 ) and the obtained pne formation rate as a function of redshift
are shown . as can be seen , the peak in the pn rate is somewhat delayed ( to @xmath33 ) with respect to the peak in the sfr , and is much more shallow at @xmath34 , due to the build - up of a reservoir during the previous epochs .
realizing that continuously habitable zones ( chzs ) exist only around stars in the spectral range of about f5 to mid k ( e.g. kasting , whitmore & reynolds 1993 ) , and that in general the biochemistry of life requires rather precise conditions , carbon - based life may be expected to start ( with the assumed sfr history ) around @xmath35 , corresponding to an age of the universe of @xmath36 yr ( for @xmath37 , as seems to be indicated by recent observations , e.g. garnavich et al . 1998 ; parlmutter et al.1998 ; reiss , press & kirshner 1996 ; carlberg et al .
1997 , and a present age of @xmath38 billion years ) .
given the fact that ( as i have shown in the previous section ) the time required to develop intelligent civilizations is @xmath3 , it is expected that civilizations will emerge when the age of the universe is @xmath39 billion years , or maybe even somewhat older , since the chzs around k stars are somewhat wider ( in log distance ) than around g stars . a younger emergence age will be obtained if the star formation rate does not decline at redshifts @xmath40 , but rather stays flat ( as is perhaps suggested by the recent cobe diffuse background experiment ; hauser et al .
1998 ; calzetti & heckman 1998 ) .
finally , i should note that the arguments presented in this paper should definitely not be taken as attempting to imply that extraterrestrial intelligent civilizations do exist .
rather , they show that the conclusion that they do nt , is at best premature ( see also rees 1997 for discussions of related issues ) . | recent discovery of extra - solar planets brown dwarfs around solar stars ( mayor & queloz 1995 ; buter & marcy 1996 basri marcy graham 1996 ) question potential existence extraterrestrial intelligent civilizations intriguing topic subject of speculations ill - defined probability estimates one study ( carter 1983 ) examined from global statistical perspective study concluded near equality between timescale biological evolution on earth @xmath0 lifetime sun @xmath1 extraterrestrial civilizations rare even if conditions favorable for development life common conclusion rarity civilizations carter 1983 barrow tipler 1986 based on one crucial assumption one observation assumption timescale of biological evolution on planet @xmath0 lifetime of central star @xmath2 independent assumes intelligent life forms at random time main lifetime star observation in earth - sun system @xmath3 factor 2 @xmath0 timescale for appearance land life if @xmath0 @xmath2 independent quantities probably either @xmath4 or @xmath5 @xmath3 small independent if @xmath6 generally difficult to understand why first system intelligent civilization earth - sun system found @xmath3 if , _ generally _ @xmath7 , first system intelligent civilization likely have @xmath8 ( for @xmath7 civilization not developed ) according to argument conclude typically @xmath9 generally intelligent civilizations not develop earth rare exception intend show this conclusion premature demonstrating @xmath0 and @xmath2 may not be independent @xmath10 may be most probable value for ratio use cosmic star formation history to estimate likely time for intelligent civilizations to emerge @xmath0 determined by biochemical reactions evolution species ) and @xmath2 by nuclear burning reactions ) should be independent light energy from central star ) exceeds 23 orders other sources energy chemical evolution in prebiotic environment @xmath0 may depend on @xmath2 ( intelligent life not develop for @xmath7 constitutes qualitative dependence ) identify specific physical process can relate two timescales out general property ratio @xmath11 described by function of form @xmath12 function @xmath13 monotonically increasing ( for narrow range of values of @xmath2 to stars allow development of life situation shown in fig . 1 .salpeter initial mass function ( 1955 ) distribution of stellar lifetimes behaves like @xmath14 ( main sequence stars @xmath15.allen 1973 ) clear from fig . 1 probable encounter intelligent civilization find @xmath10 number of stars increases right diagram ) if some processes likely produce monotonically increasing ( @xmath2 ; @xmath11 ) relation @xmath3 in earth - sun system natural explanation implications for frequency extraterrestrial civilizations if breadth of ` band ' in fig . 1 becomes extremely large equivalent to no @xmath0@xmath2 relation carter s argument recovered example of @xmath0@xmath2 relation may arise not realistic model demonstrate relation could exist nucleic acid absorption of uv radiation peaks between @xmath16 and @xmath17 proteins between @xmath17 and @xmath18 absorption bands lethal to cell activity 1952 constituents planet s atmosphere only o@xmath19 absorbs efficiently in 20003000 range suggested appearance of land life build - up sufficient layer of protective ozone ( 1965 hart 1978 )important to understand origin evolution of oxygen in planetary atmospheres limited knowledge exists earth s atmosphere for present example two phases in rise of oxygen in planetary atmospheres berkner marshall 1965 hart 1978 1979 first lasted @xmath20 yr oxygen released from photochemical dissociation water vapor led to oxygen levels @xmath21 second phase lasted @xmath22 yr o@xmath23 o@xmath19 reach levels @xmath24 p.a.l shadow land from lethal uv spread life to dry land uv extinction expressed as @xmath25 @xmath26 impinging intensity @xmath27 absorption coefficient @xmath28 path length duration of first phase inversely proportional to intensity radiation in range 10002000 peaks in h@xmath23o absorption in 11001300 16001800 ranges planetary size orbit timescale for development of shielding dependent on stellar spectral type @xmath2 for typical main sequence star relations @xmath29 @xmath30 in range 0.61 spectral types f5k5 empirical fractions of radiation emitted in 10002000range ( stecker 1970 ; carruthers 1971 simple calculationlivio & kopelman 1990 leads to relation @xmath31 = 4.6 relation like ( 1 ) monotonically increasing highest probability find @xmath3 near equality of timescales earth - sun system not imply extraterrestrial civilizations rare detailed evolution of atmosphere more complicated than dependence on intensity uv photons different phases evolution have different dependences on properties central star @xmath0@xmath2 relation not implausible @xmath32 ) could increase faster than linearly extraterrestrial civilizations not be rare likely time for civilizations to emerge restrict discussion to carbon - based civilizations emergence to coincide with peak carbon production rate main contributors of carbon interstellar medium are intermediate mass stars wood 1981 tutukov livio 1993 asymptotic giant branch planetary nebulae ( ) phases progress in understanding cosmic history of star formation rate ( sfr ) madau et al.1996 lilly dickinson 1997 ) assuming galaxies follow same sfr history stellar evolution processes calculate rate of formation of planetary nebulae rate carbon production ) as function of redshift population synthesis code follows evolution stars mainly in binaries including episodes mass exchange common envelope phases used see yungelson , tutukov & livio 1993 ; yungelson et al . 1996 for details code grateful to lev yungelson for simulations in fig . 2 assumed sfr function of redshift madau et al . 1996 obtained pne formation rate function redshift shown peak in pn rate delayed to @xmath33 ) peak sfr more shallow at @xmath34 due to build - up reservoir during previous epochs continuously habitable zones exist around stars in spectral range f5 to mid k biochemistry life requires precise conditions carbon - based life start around @xmath35 age universe @xmath36 yr ( for @xmath37 recent observations garnavich 1998 parlmutter 1996 carlberg et 1997 present age @xmath38 billion years time required to develop intelligent civilizations is @xmath3 expected civilizations emerge when age universe is @xmath39 billion years or maybe older chzs around k stars wider than around g starsyounger emergence age obtained if star formation rate decline at redshifts @xmath40 stays flat suggested by cobe diffuse background experiment ; hauser et al . 1998 calzetti & heckman 1998 arguments in paper not imply extraterrestrial civilizations exist show conclusion premature see rees 1997 for related issues | 0.438613 | 2,840 | 1,443 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,040 | the origin of ultraluminous x - ray sources ( ulxs ) in external galaxies whose x - ray luminosities exceed those of the brightest black holes in our galaxy by hundreds and thousands of times is mysterious .
the most popular models for the ulxs involve either intermediate mass black holes ( imbhs ) or stellar - mass black holes accreting at super - eddington rates .
here we review the ulx properties , their x - ray spectra indicate a presence of hot winds in their accretion disks supposing the supercritical accretion .
however , the strongest evidences come from optical spectroscopy .
the spectra of the ulx counterparts are very similar to that of ss433 , the only known supercritical accretor in our galaxy .
ultraluminous x - ray sources ( ulxs ) are x - ray sources with luminosities exceeding the eddington limit for a typical stellar - mass black hole @xmath0 erg s@xmath1 . despite their importance in understanding the origin of supermassive black holes that reside in most of present galaxies , the basic nature of ulxs remains unsolved.@xcite the most popular models for the ulxs involve either intermediate mass black holes ( imbh , @xmath2@xmath3m@xmath4)@xcite with standard accretion disks or stellar - mass black holes ( @xmath5m@xmath4 ) accreting at super - eddington rates .
the last idea has been suggested@xcite because of an analogy with ss433 , the only known super - accretor in the galaxy,@xcite and developed in ( ref .
13 , 18 ) .
it was proposed that ss433 supercritical disk s funnel being observed nearly face - on will appear as extremely bright x - ray source . both scenarios
, however , require a massive donor in a close binary .
most of the ulxs are associated with the star - forming regions and surrounded with nebulae of a complex shape , indicating a dynamical influence of the black hole.@xcite they are not distributed throughout galaxies as it would be expected for imbhs originating from low - metallicity population iii stars .
the imbhs may be produced in a runaway merging in a core of young clusters . in this case
, they should stay within the clusters .
it has been found@xcite that all brightest x - ray sources in antennae galaxies are located nearby to very young stellar clusters .
it was concluded that the sources were ejected in the process of formation of stellar clusters in the dynamical few - body encounters and that the majority of ulxs are massive x - ray binaries with the progenitor masses larger than 50m@xmath4 .
the x - ray spectra of the ulxs often show a high - energy curvature with a downturn between @xmath6 and @xmath7kev .
it was called `` ultraliminous state''.@xcite the curvature hints that the ulx accretion disks are not standard .
inner parts of the disks may be covered with hot outflow or optically thick corona , which comptonizes the inner disk photons .
spectra of almost all optical counterparts of studied ulxs ( with ss433 included ) are shown in fig.1 .
main features in all the spectra are the bright heii@xmath8 , hydrogen h@xmath9 , and h@xmath10 emission lines .
the lines are obviously broad ; the widths range from 500 to 1500 km s@xmath1 .
some hydrogen lines are contaminated by nebulae ( over - subsraction of narrow absorptions ) associated with the ulxs .
however the broad emission components in h@xmath9 are clearly seen . in the ss433 spectrum , besides moving lines which form in the relativistic jets , stationary emission lines , the bowen blend ciii / niii @xmath11 and three hei lines are observed .
some of these lines are seen in the ulx spectra.@xcite all the spectra of the ulxs ( the spectra were reduced by us ) are surprisingly similar to one another .
the optical spectra are also similar to that of ss 433 , although the ulx spectra indicate a higher wind temperature . it was suggested in ( ref .
6 ) that the ulxs must constitute a homogeneous class of objects , which most likely have supercritical accretion disks .
the total luminosity of a supercritical disk is proportional to the eddington luminosity with an additional logarithmical factor depending on the original mass accretion rate,@xcite because the excess gas is expelled as a disk wind and the accreted gas is advected with the photon trapping , contributing little to the photon luminosity .
however , the uv and optical luminosity in such disks may strongly depend on the original mass accretion rate , because these budgets are mainly produced by the reprocess of the strong irradiation from the wind ( the excess gas ) . optical spectra of ss433 and the ulx counterpart are nearly the same , but in x - rays they are drastically different because we can not observe the funnel in ss433 directly .
it was found@xcite that the mass accretion rates in the ulxs may be by a factor of 1.56 smaller and their wind temperatures are by 1.44 times higher than those in ss433 . in fig.2
we show absolute magnitude of all well studied ulxs together with ss433 .
thus , one may interpret that ss433 is intrinsically the same as ulxs but an extreme case with a particularly high mass accretion rate , which could explain the presence of its persistent jets.@xcite in fig.3 we present one more evidence of the super eddington accretion in ulxs .
the power density spectrum of ss433 exhibit a flat part in the @xmath12hz frequency range.@xcite the presence of such a part is related to the abrupt change in the disk structure and the viscous time at the spherization radius . in this place
the accretion disk becomes thick , which reduces drastically the time of passage of matter through the disk.@xcite the same picture is observed in the well - studied ulx ngc5408 x-1 .
we need longer observations of the ulxs to study their power density spectra in more details . | the research was supported by the russian scientific foundation grant ( n14 - 50 - 00043 ) and rfbr grants ( n15 - 42 - 02573 , 16 - 02 - 00567 , 16 - 32 - 00210 ) .
sf acknowledges support of the russian government program of competitive growth of kazan federal university . | research supported russian scientific foundation grant - - 00043 rfbr grants - 42 - 02573 - 00567 - 00210 russian government program growth kazan federal university | 0.067959 | 75 | 37 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,042 | the matter effects for solar neutrino oscillations are studied in a general scheme with an arbitrary number of sterile neutrinos , without any constraint on the mixing , assuming only a realistic hierarchy of neutrino squared - mass differences in which the smallest squared - mass difference is effective in solar neutrino oscillations .
the validity of the analytic results are illustrated with a numerical solution of the evolution equation in three examples of the possible mixing matrix in the simplest case of four - neutrino mixing .
r * matter effects in active - sterile solar neutrino oscillations + c. giunti@xmath0 , y.f .
li@xmath1 + _ _ * [ cols="^ , < " , ] we solved numerically the effective two - neutrino evolution equation ( [ 041 ] ) for the exponential electron number density profile @xmath2 which is a good approximation of the real electron number density in the solar radiative and convective zones ( see ref .
@xcite ) .
we considered two values of the electron fraction @xmath3 : the realistic value @xmath4 , which is a good approximation in the solar radiative and convective zones ( see fig . [ fig01 ] ) , and the unrealistic value @xmath5 , which is useful to test the effects of the neutral - current potential and the case @xmath6 .
the panels in figs .
[ fig02 ] and [ fig03 ] show , respectively , the averaged @xmath7 survival probability and the averaged probability of @xmath8 transitions as functions of the neutrino energy @xmath9 for the three examples of mixing matrices m1 , m2 , and m3 in tab . [ tab01 ] .
notice that in order to check beyond any doubt the validity of the analytic flavor transition probability ( [ 068 ] ) both in the adiabatic and non - adiabatic regimes , we considered a very wide range of energies , from @xmath10 to @xmath11 , which is much wider than the energy range of measurable solar neutrinos , from about @xmath12 to about @xmath13 .
moreover , the inequality ( [ 026 ] ) , which allows the approximation in eq .
( [ 029 ] ) , is not valid for energies not much smaller than about 100 mev , for which the value of @xmath14 in the center of the sun is of the same order as @xmath15 .
hence , we emphasize that the energy values larger than those of solar neutrinos in figs .
[ fig02 ] and [ fig03 ] are considered only for the purpose of checking the validity of the analytic solution of the evolution equation ( [ 041 ] ) . from figs .
[ fig02 ] and [ fig03 ] one can see that the values of the flavor transition probability obtained with the analytic expression ( [ 068 ] ) and the numerical solution of the evolution equation ( [ 041 ] ) agree perfectly in all the three examples considered .
also , the extreme non - adiabatic limit discussed in section [ non - adiabatic ] is perfectly described by the analytic approximation .
the figures illustrate also some different peculiar behavior of the averaged oscillation probabilities in the three examples . with the realistic electron fraction @xmath4 , @xmath16 has the same qualitative behavior in the three examples , whereas @xmath17 is enhanced by the matter effect in m1 and m3 and suppressed in m2 .
this is due to the different signs of @xmath18 ( see tab .
[ tab01 ] ) . in m1 and m3
@xmath18 is negative and the adiabatic part of the transition probability @xmath19 is positive , leading to an enhancement of @xmath17 . in m2 the opposite happens . in the case of the unrealistic electron fraction @xmath5
, one can see from figs .
[ fig02 ] and [ fig03 ] that @xmath20 because @xmath6 , as discussed in section [ non - adiabatic ] .
the three examples have the following interesting differences in the extreme non - adiabatic limit . from fig . [ fig02 ]
one can see that @xmath21 in m1 and m2 and the inequality is reversed in m3 .
this happens because @xmath22 in m1 and m2 , whereas @xmath23 in m3 . from fig .
[ fig03 ] one can see that @xmath24 in m1 and the inequality is reversed in m2 and m3 .
these behaviors are due to the fact that @xmath22 and @xmath25 in m1 , @xmath22 and @xmath26 in m2 , and @xmath23 and @xmath25 in m3 .
after the check of the analytic expression ( [ 068 ] ) for the flavor transition probability in the case of the perfect exponential density ( [ 155 ] ) and a constant electron number fraction , we also checked its validity for the realistic bp04 standard solar model density @xcite , taking into account the variation of the electron number fraction ( plotted in fig .
[ fig01 ] ) .
the results of the analytic expression ( [ 068 ] ) and of the numerical solution of the evolution equation ( [ 041 ] ) are presented in fig .
[ fig04 ] for the three examples of mixing matrices m1 , m2 , and m3 .
we considered only neutrino energies smaller than about 50 mev , for which the inequality ( [ 026 ] ) and the approximation ( [ 029 ] ) are valid . in this range of energies
the flavor transition is practically adiabatic and we expect that non - adiabatic effects due to the variation of the electron number fraction are negligible . indeed , from fig .
[ fig04 ] one can see that the analytic approximation is very accurate for solar neutrinos and the effects of the variation of the electron number fraction , which are neglected in the analytic approximation , are really negligible . from the left panel in fig .
[ fig04 ] one can see that active - sterile transitions as those in the examples m1 , m2 , and m3 can change significantly the @xmath7 survival probability with respect to the standard three - neutrino mixing value in the case of negligible @xmath27 ( dash - dotted line ) .
therefore , it is important to perform an analysis of solar neutrino data @xcite in the framework of active - sterile neutrino mixing that we have considered in order to obtain information on the possible existence of sterile neutrinos and their mixing with the active ones . | in this paper we derived an analytic solution for the flavor transition probabilities of solar neutrinos in a general scheme with an arbitrary number of sterile neutrinos , without any constraint on the mixing .
hence , we improved the study presented in ref .
@xcite , where it was assumed that the electron neutrino has non - negligible mixing only with the two massive neutrinos which generate the solar squared - mass difference .
here we only assumed a realistic hierarchy of neutrino squared - mass differences in which the smallest squared - mass difference is effective in solar neutrino oscillations .
in section [ 091 ] we have illustrated the validity of the analytical approximation ( [ 068 ] ) of the flavor transition probability by comparing its value with that obtained with a numerical solution of the evolution equation in three examples of the possible mixing matrix in the simplest case of four - neutrino mixing .
hence , we are confident that the expression ( [ 068 ] ) of the flavor transition probability can be used in a reliable analysis of the solar neutrino data which could provide important information on active - sterile neutrino mixing @xcite .
we would like to thank the department of theoretical physics of the university of torino for hospitality and support .
in this paper we used four different bases of the neutrino states and amplitudes : 1 .
the flavor basis of amplitudes in eq .
( [ 017 ] ) , related to the flavor states on the left - hand side of eq .
( [ 005a ] ) .
the vacuum mass basis of amplitudes in eq .
( [ 027 ] ) , related to the vacuum mass basis of states in the right - hand side of eq .
( [ 005a ] ) .
3 . the effective mass basis in matter of amplitudes in the truncated 1 - 2 sector , @xmath28 and @xmath29 , introduced in eq . ( [ 042 ] ) .
4 . the effective interaction basis in matter of amplitudes in the truncated 1 - 2 sector , @xmath30 and @xmath31 , introduced in eq . ( [ 044 ] ) . since @xmath32 we have @xmath33 therefore , the effective interaction amplitudes @xmath30 and @xmath31 for which the matter potential in the truncated 1 - 2 sector is diagonal are linear combinations of the flavor amplitudes @xmath34 , @xmath35 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 .
furthermore , from eqs .
( [ 042 ] ) and ( [ 046 ] ) we derive immediately the relation between the amplitudes @xmath28 and @xmath29 of the effective energy eigenstates in matter and the flavor amplitudes @xmath40 : @xmath41 in the effective mass and interaction bases in matter the solar neutrino state in eq .
( [ 014 ] ) is given by @xmath42 with the effective massive states in matter @xmath43 and the effective interaction states @xmath44 thus , a flavor neutrino states can be expressed as @xmath45 for @xmath46 .
one can see that in general each flavor state contains both the effective massive states @xmath47 and @xmath48 as well as both the effective interaction states @xmath49 and @xmath50 . | paper derived analytic solution flavor transition probabilities solar neutrinos arbitrary sterile neutrinos without constraint mixing improved study @xcite assumed electron neutrino non - negligible mixing with two massive neutrinos solar squared - mass difference assumed realistic hierarchy neutrino squared - mass differences smallest difference effective in solar neutrino oscillations section [ 091 ] illustrated validity approximation ( [ 068 ] ) flavor transition probability comparing with numerical solution evolution equation three examples possible mixing matrix four - neutrino mixing confident expression ( [ 068 ] ) flavor transition probability used reliable analysis solar neutrino data information active - sterile neutrino mixing department theoretical physics university torino support used four bases neutrino states amplitudes flavor basis amplitudes eq . ( [ 017 ] ) states left - hand side vacuum mass basis amplitudes 027 ] right - hand side effective mass basis matter amplitudes truncated 1 - 2 sector @xmath28 @xmath29 eq . ( [ 042 ] )effective interaction basis matter amplitudes truncated 1 - 2 sector @xmath30 introduced eq . [ 044 ] ) @xmath32 @xmath33 effective interaction amplitudes @xmath30 matter potential diagonal linear combinations flavor amplitudes @xmath34 eqs . ( [ 042 ] 046 ] relation amplitudes @xmath28 @xmath29 energy eigenstates flavor amplitudes @xmath40 @xmath41 effective mass interaction bases matter solar neutrino state eq 014 ] @xmath42 effective massive states @xmath43 interaction states @xmath44 flavor neutrino states expressed @xmath45 @xmath46 each flavor state contains effective massive states @xmath47 @xmath48 interaction states @xmath49 @xmath50 | 0.137606 | 715 | 356 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,048 | we perform a model study on the @xmath0-flavor lattice schwinger model using standard wilson and @xmath1 improved sheikholeslami - wohlert ( sw ) action .
we find , that the phase diagram is altered , the critical line shifted closer towards its continuum value @xmath2 .
we find no improvement in the rotation invariance of meson propagators ; the scaling of the schwinger mass is considerably improved , high momentum states are not .
the additional cost of @xmath3 cpu - time is highly justified when calculating masses , but not for high momentum observables .
pacs : 11.15.ha , 11.10.kk + key words : lattice field theory , schwinger model , clover ( sw ) improved dirac operator , eigenvalue spectrum , scaling behaviour | in recent years , there has been an increasing interest in possible use of improved actions to lattice qcd .
there exist different improvement schemes for lattice actions and observables , all which aim at the extraction of continuum physics from simulations on coarse lattices .
the simplest of these improvement schemes is the clover action , an @xmath1 improvement of the wilson fermion action suggested by sheikholeslami and wohlert @xcite , who implemented the symanzik improvement @xcite for the dirac operator .
several calculations in quenched and some in full qcd have been performed using this action especially to calculate both heavy and light hadron masses . the results obtained seem promising , so that one might want to check the improvement effects of the clover action in a simple and well - known toy model . here
we study the effects of the @xmath1 improvement of the wilson action in the full lattice schwinger model .
this model seems optimally suited for this purpose .
massless qed in @xmath4 dimension was first studied by schwinger @xcite as an example of an explicitly solvable qft . in subsequent papers
@xcite the model was generalized to allow for fermion masses and include different flavors .
the schwinger model became of considerable interest during the early 1970 s , because it shows some remarkable features like fermion confinement or a @xmath5-vacuum structure which are reminiscent of qcd .
for the purpose of this paper , it is sufficient to note , that the massless @xmath6-flavor schwinger model has a spectrum which consists of one massive isosinglet boson and a isomultiplet of @xmath7 massless fermion - antifermion bound states ( for further discussion cf .
e.g. @xcite ) .
the mass of the isosinglet state , the schwinger mass ( in lattice units ) is given by @xmath8 where @xmath9 denotes the dimensionless gauge coupling .
in the next section some technical details about the definition and the numerical simulation will be given and in sec .
3 we discuss the effect of the improvement on the rotation invariance of the propagator , the phase diagram and the dispersion relations of the schwinger boson .
the fermionic part of the wilson action for the massive , n - flavor schwinger model is @xmath10 the fields have @xmath11 components , @xmath12 are the pauli matrices . this action has a classical @xmath1 error introduced by the wilson term , which can be removed @xcite by rotating the fermion fields @xmath13 and adding a term @xmath14 to the action .
@xmath15 denotes the clover - leaf discretization of the field strength tensor .
the resulting lattice dirac operator now has discretization errors of @xmath16 .
we note in passing that for this model one may introduce a topological charge in its ` geometric ' definition @xmath17 @xcite .
thus @xmath18 introduces a local coupling of @xmath19 to @xmath20 .
the coefficient @xmath21 , which generally has to be determined non - perturbatively at finite @xmath22 , is just @xmath23 in 2d , since the gauge coupling @xmath24 is dimensionful and therefore @xmath25 , which only gives corrections to higher order in @xmath26 .
since the gauge part of the wilson action @xmath27 has @xmath16 discretization errors , the total action @xmath28 together with ( [ frot ] ) gives a lattice version of the schwinger model with discretization errors of @xmath16 .
we have done a mc simulation of the schwinger model , using both the wilson and the sw action , with two degenerate flavors of dynamical fermions .
we used a hybrid monte carlo algorithm with 10 integration steps and a trajectory length tuned for a @xmath29 acceptance rate of the mc step . for fermion matrix inversion we used a standard conjugate gradient algorithm , and there was no problem with its convergence or stability .
in that algorithm the doubling of the fermionic species is required in order to guarantee positivity of the fermionic determinant one of our reasons to study the schwinger model with two flavors . in our implementation
, the speed loss when including the clover term into the action is consistently @xmath30 .
depending on the lattice size ( from @xmath31 up to @xmath32 ) and couplings , we skipped @xmath33 to @xmath34 configurations between measurements and finally had between @xmath35 and @xmath36 independent configurations . to check for ergodicity
, we measured the topological charge ( using the geometric definition ) and observed , that in each run the system tunneled several times between different topological sectors .
the additional term in the action affects the critical @xmath37 value where the theory has effectively massless fermions .
since the clover action is supposedly closer to the continuum ( has smaller corrections to leading scaling behavior ) , we might expect less renormalization of @xmath38 with a value closer to its continuum value of @xmath39 even for small @xmath22 . in order to determine @xmath40 we follow suggestions @xcite to utilize the pcac relation as discussed in @xcite for the schwinger model . at each @xmath22
we measured an observable proportional to the effective fermion mass for @xmath41 different @xmath37 values and determined @xmath38 .
our result for a @xmath31 lattice is compared with the result for the original wilson fermion action in fig .
[ phd ] .
the values @xmath38 for the clover action are in fact closer to @xmath39 .
however , both , wilson and clover action have corrections @xmath42 the dependence on the finite lattice volume is weak and for the wilson action is discussed elsewhere @xcite .
the spectral distribution of the dirac operator is of some interest with regard to topological and chiral properties of the system .
recent studies for the schwinger model @xcite and for the sw - action in 4d @xcite have emphasized these aspects .
[ swspectrum ] should be compared with typical spectra for the pure wilson dirac operator ( cf .
e.g. @xcite ) . as compared to the wilson action with its @xmath43 and @xmath44 symmetries we observe for the sw operator an agglomeration of eigenvalues at larger distances from 0 .
this feature may improve somewhat the separation of the low - lying states from the doubling states already at moderate @xmath22 .
for the continuum limit the distribution density of small eigenvalues is of relevance .
however , the distribution is not much closer to the circular shape one obtains for fixed point actions @xcite or neuberger - projected actions @xcite .
we can not identify a clear signal of improvement in this respect for the sw dirac operator .
we measured the propagators of the pseudoscalar isotriplet ( @xmath45 ) mesonic bound states . in the 2-flavor model these modes are expected to be massless at @xmath38 . for short distances on the lattice ,
the rotation invariance of these propagators is clearly broken when using wilson action .
generally , improved actions are expected to show better rotation invariance ( cf .
the schwinger model fp action study in @xcite ) .
one must be careful not to compare these quantities simply at the same values of @xmath22 and @xmath37 , but at values corresponding to comparable discretization of the same continuum theory .
we choose to compare the propagators at @xmath46 and the respective @xmath38 , so that we have a discretization of the massless ( fermion ) theory in both cases .
the results are shown in fig.[rot ] .
we find no noticeable improvement of rotation invariance when using the clover action .
the relative error of the diagonal @xmath47 propagator compared to the @xmath48 and @xmath49 propagators is @xmath50 for both actions .
this is the first indication , that short distance ( high momentum ) observables are not improved .
[ disp ] shows the dispersion relations for the massive ( isosinglet vector ) and the massless ( isotriplet vector ) meson at @xmath46 and @xmath51 on a @xmath52 lattice .
no improvement for the high momentum behavior is observed . concerning the mass of the massive boson
, however , the improvement is significant .
[ mass ] shows the ratio of the observed schwinger mass over its continuum value at @xmath53 on a @xmath52 and @xmath54 , @xmath51 on a @xmath32 lattice . assuming the continuum scaling behavior @xmath55 these are different discretizations of the same physical system size @xmath56 .
the improvement when including the clover term is quite obvious .
the scaling corrections are remarkably smaller for the clover results .
this behavior , the considerable improvement of low momentum states and the lack thereof for high momentum states , is no surprise when one considers , that the construction of symanzik improved actions aims at improving the fermion dispersion relations for low momenta ( cf .
the overall improvement of the fixed point action in @xcite ( which , however has more than hundred terms per site in the action ) is definitely more pronounced and extends to high momenta as well .
we performed a monte carlo simulation on the 2-flavor lattice schwinger model , comparing standard wilson to an @xmath1 improved sheikholeslami - wohlert action .
we found the following results : * the critical value of the hopping parameter @xmath38 moves closer to its continuum value @xmath39 .
* the eigenvalue spectrum of the lattice sw dirac operator changes but does not appear to improve significantly towards , e.g. a circular shape .
* there was no improvement in the rotation invariance of meson propagators . for the meson dispersion relations
, there is no improvement in the high momentum states .
* there is considerable improvement in the scaling behavior of the schwinger mass of the massive boson .
these observations are consistent with the fact that the sw action is constructed as an improved action for low momentum fermionic states @xmath57 . while there is considerable improvement in low momentum observables , high momentum observables are largely unaffected by the addition of the clover term .
for the full fermion qcd simulations this suggests that it is preferable to use the clover action as long as one is only interested in the mass spectrum of the theory . on the other hand
, some observables will likely show no improvement at all , especially those connected with high momentum states .
we would like to thank prof .
claudio rebbi and ivan hip for many helpful discussions .
c.b.l . also wants to thank claudio for the kind hospitality at boston university and wants to acknowledge support by heinrich - jrg - stiftung , univ .
the work was supported by fonds zur frderung der wissenschaftlichen forschung in sterreich , project p11502-phy . | increasing interest in improved actions lattice qcd different improvement schemes for lattice aim extraction continuum physics from simulations coarse lattices simplest clover action @xmath1 improvement wilson fermion action suggested by sheikholeslami wohlert symanzik improvement calculations in quenched full qcd performed using action heavy light hadron masses results promising check improvement effects clover action in toy model study effects @xmath1 improvement wilson action in full lattice schwinger model suited massless qed in @xmath4 dimension studied by schwinger @xcite solvable qft model generalized to fermion masses different flavors schwinger model interest early 1970 s shows remarkable features like fermion confinement @xmath5-vacuum structure reminiscent of qcd massless @xmath6-flavor schwinger model has spectrum one massive isosinglet boson isomultiplet of @xmath7 massless fermion - antifermion bound states mass of isosinglet state schwinger mass in lattice units given by @xmath8 @xmath9 dimensionless gauge coupling next section technical details about definition numerical simulationdiscuss effect improvement rotation phase diagram dispersion relations schwinger boson fermionic part wilson action flavor schwinger model @xmath10 fields @xmath11 components @xmath12 pauli matrices @xmath1 error wilson term removed rotating fermion fields adding term @xmath14 @xmath15 clover - leaf discretization field strength tensor lattice dirac operator discretization errors @xmath16 model topological charge geometric definition @xmath17 @xmath18 introduces local coupling @xmath19 @xmath20 coefficient @xmath21 determined finite @xmath22 @xmath23 2d gauge coupling @xmath24 dimensionful @xmath25 corrections higher order @xmath26 gauge wilson action @xmath27 has @xmath16 discretization errors total action @xmath28 gives lattice version schwinger model discretization errors @xmath16 mc simulation schwinger model wilson sw action two degenerate flavors fermions hybrid monte carlo algorithm 10 integration steps trajectory length tuned @xmath29 acceptance rate mc step fermion matrix inversion standard conjugate gradient algorithm no problem convergence stabilityalgorithm doubling fermionic species required guarantee positivity fermionic determinant study schwinger model two flavors speed loss clover term consistently @xmath30 lattice size couplings skipped @xmath33 to @xmath34 configurations @xmath35 and @xmath36 independent configurations check ergodicity measured topological charge each run system tunneled several times between topological sectors additional term affects @xmath37 value massless fermions clover action closer to continuum smaller corrections scaling expect less renormalization @xmath38 value closer to continuum @xmath39 small @xmath22 determine @xmath40 utilize pcac relation model each measured observable proportional to effective fermion mass for @xmath41 @xmath37 values determined @xmath38 result @xmath31 lattice compared with original wilson fermion action fig . values @xmath38 clover action closer to @xmath39 both wilson clover action have corrections @xmath42 dependence on finite lattice volume weak wilson action discussed elsewhere spectral distribution dirac operator interest topological chiral properties system recent studies schwinger model sw - action 4d emphasized aspectsswspectrum compared with spectra wilson dirac operator @xcite compared wilson action @xmath43 @xmath44 symmetries operator agglomeration of eigenvalues at larger distances from 0 improve separation low - lying states from doubling states at moderate @xmath22 continuum limit distribution density small eigenvalues distribution not closer to circular shape for fixed point actions @xcite or neuberger - projected actions signal improvement sw dirac operator measured propagators of pseudoscalar isotriplet ( @xmath45 ) mesonic bound states 2-flavor model modes expected massless at @xmath38 short distances rotation invariance propagators broken wilson action improved actions show better rotation invariance schwinger model fp action study compare values @xmath22 @xmath37 comparable continuum theory propagators at @xmath46 @xmath38 massless theory results shown in fig.[rot no improvement of rotation invariance clover action relative error of diagonal @xmath47 propagator @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 for both first indication short distance high momentum ) observables not improveddisp ] shows dispersion relations massive massless meson at @xmath46 @xmath51 @xmath52 lattice no improvement high momentum behavior mass massive boson improvement significant mass ] shows ratio observed schwinger mass over continuum value at @xmath53 @xmath52 @xmath54 @xmath51 @xmath32 lattice different discretizations same physical system size @xmath56 improvement clover term obvious scaling corrections smaller for clover results improvement low momentum lack high momentum states construction symanzik improved actions fermion dispersion relations low momenta improvement fixed point action in @xcite pronounced extends to high momenta performed monte carlo simulation on 2-flavor lattice schwinger model standard wilson to improved sheikholeslami - wohlert action results critical value hopping parameter @xmath38 moves closer to continuum value @xmath39 eigenvalue spectrum lattice sw dirac operator changes circular shape no improvement in rotation invariance of meson propagators no improvement high momentum states considerable improvement in scaling behavior schwinger mass massive bosonobservations consistent with sw action improved for low momentum fermionic states considerable improvement in low momentum high momentum unaffected by clover term full fermion qcd simulations preferable use clover action in mass spectrum some observables show no improvement especially high momentum states prof claudio rebbi ivan hip for discussions c.b.l claudio hospitality boston university support heinrich - jrg - stiftung univ work supported by fonds zur frderung wissenschaftlichen forschung in sterreich project p11502-phy | 0.35715 | 2,397 | 1,228 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,051 | we show how to define the tensor product of two braided hopf algebras . | in this short note we show how to endow with a canonical hopf algebra structure the tensor product @xmath0 of two braided hopf algebras living in a monoidal category , provided that there is an isomorphism @xmath1 satisfying suitable conditions ( see proposition [ prop1.1 ] ) . in particular
, the square tensor @xmath2 is always a braided hopf algebra with this structure . also , the tensor product of two hopf algebras living in a braided category is again a braided hopf algebra ( although in a new braided category ) . when seen in this context ,
the key point is to replace the braid @xmath3 with @xmath4 .
we work in a monoidal category @xmath5 , for instance , the category of vector spaces over a field @xmath6 .
we write @xmath7 and @xmath8 for the tensor product and the unit of @xmath5 , respectively .
the associativity and unit constraints are assumed without referring to them .
we assume the reader is familiar with the notions of algebras and coalgebras in monoidal categories .
all the algebras are associative unitary and the coalgebras are coassociative counitary . given an algebra @xmath9 and a coalgebra @xmath10 , we let @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 denote the multiplication , the unit , the comultiplication and the counit , respectively , specified with a subscript if necessary .
we are going to use the nowadays well known graphic calculus for monoidal and braided categories .
as usual , morphisms will be composed downwards and tensor products will be represented by horizontal concatenation in the corresponding order .
the identity map of an object will be represented by a vertical line . given an algebra @xmath9 , the diagrams @xmath15 and stand for the multiplication map and the unit of @xmath9 respectively .
given a coalgebra @xmath10 , the comultiplication and the counit of @xmath10 will be represented by the diagrams @xmath16 and respectively .
let @xmath17 , @xmath18 be objects in @xmath19 and let @xmath20 be an arrow .
* if @xmath17 is an algebra , then we say that @xmath21 is _ compatible _ with the algebra structure of @xmath17 if @xmath22 and @xmath23 . *
if @xmath17 is a coalgebra , then we say that @xmath21 is compatible with the coalgebra structure of @xmath17 if @xmath24 and @xmath25 .
of course , there are similar compatibilities when @xmath18 is an algebra or a coalgebra .
recall that a braided bialgebra in @xmath5 is an object @xmath26 of @xmath5 endowed with an algebra structure , a coalgebra structure and an isomorphism @xmath27 ( called the braid of @xmath26 ) satisfying the braid equation @xmath28 such that : @xmath29 is compatible with the algebra and coalgebra structures of @xmath26 , @xmath30 is a coalgebra morphism , @xmath31 is an algebra morphism and @xmath32 .
if moreover there exists a map @xmath33 which is the inverse of the identity in the monoid @xmath34 with the convolution product , then we say that @xmath26 is a braided hopf algebra and we call @xmath35 the antipode of @xmath26 .
let @xmath26 be a braided bialgebra in @xmath19 .
it is well known that if the braid of @xmath26 is involutive ( i.e. , @xmath36 ) , then @xmath37 is a braided bialgebra in a natural way .
the following proposition is the main result in this note .
it shows in particular that the involutivity hypothesis can be removed .
[ prop1.1 ] let @xmath26 and @xmath38 braided bialgebras in @xmath19 and let @xmath39 be a invertible arrow . if @xmath40 and @xmath41 is compatible with the bialgebras structures of @xmath26 and @xmath38 , then @xmath42 is a braided bialgebra , via * @xmath43 * @xmath44 , * @xmath45 , * @xmath46 , * @xmath47
. moreover , if @xmath26 and @xmath38 are braided hopf algebras , then so is @xmath42 , with antipode @xmath48 .
the fact that @xmath0 is an algebra and a coalgebra is well - known and standard .
we check now the compatibility between multiplication and comultiplication : @xmath49\object{h } & \step[1]\object{l } \\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id } } & \xx & \step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh \cu & & \cu \\
\hh \cd & & \cd \\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id } } & \x & \step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\object{h } & \object{l } \step[1]\object{h } & \step[1]\object{l } \\
\end{tangles } \;=\ ; \begin{tangles}{lccr } \hh\step[.5]\object{h } \step[2 ] \object{l } \step[2]\object{h } \step[2]\object{l }
\\ \step[.5]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[2]\xx\step[2]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\cd \step[1]\cd \step[1 ] \cd \step[1 ] \cd \\ \hh \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \xx \step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \xx \step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\cu \step[1]\cu \step[1 ] \cu \step[1 ] \cu \\ \step[.5]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[2]\x\step[2]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\step[.5]\object{h } \step[2 ] \object{l } \step[2]\object{h } \step[2]\object{l } \\ \end{tangles } \;=\ ; \begin{tangles}{lccr } \hh\step[.5]\object{h } \step[2 ] \object{l } \step[2]\object{h } \step[2]\object{l } \\ \hh\cd \step[1]\cd \step[1 ] \cd \step[1 ] \cd \\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\xx\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \xx \step[1 ] \xx \step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \xx \step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \xx \step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\x\step[1]\x\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\x\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\cu \step[1]\cu \step[1 ] \cu \step[1 ] \cu \\ \hh\step[.5]\object{h } \step[2 ] \object{l } \step[2]\object{h } \step[2]\object{l } \\ \end{tangles } \;=\ ; \begin{tangles}{lccr } \hh\step[.5]\object{h } \step[2 ] \object{l } \step[2]\object{h } \step[2]\object{l } \\ \hh\cd \step[1]\cd \step[1 ] \cd \step[1 ] \cd \\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\x\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\x\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\xx\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\xx\step[1]\xx\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\x\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\xx \step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\xx \step[1]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\cu \step[1]\cu \step[1 ] \cu \step[1 ] \cu \\ \hh\step[.5]\object{h } \step[2 ] \object{l } \step[2]\object{h } \step[2]\object{l } \\ \end{tangles } \end{aligned}\ ] ] we leave to the reader to prove that @xmath50 satisfies the braid equation , and that it is compatible with @xmath51 , @xmath52 , @xmath53 and @xmath54 . the proof of the last assertion in the statement is also straightforward .
the aim of this section is to give a more categorical proof of proposition [ prop1.1 ]
. the methods presented here could be useful in generalizing this result to braided versions of bicrossproducts , matched pairs , etc .
( see @xcite ) .
let @xmath55 be a family of objects in @xmath5 .
a family @xmath56 of isomorphisms @xmath57 is said to be _ braided _ if @xmath58 the braid equations @xmath59 are satisfied .
given such a family and a string @xmath60 of elements in @xmath61 , we call @xmath62 the _ length _ of @xmath63 , we let @xmath64 denote the string @xmath65 and we put @xmath66 . for each pair @xmath67 of such strings
we define the map @xmath68 , recursively by let @xmath81 , where @xmath82 is a family of maps compatible with @xmath56 .
we want to embed this datum into a braided category in a natural way .
to this end , let @xmath83 be the category whose objects are pairs @xmath84 , where @xmath18 is an object in @xmath5 and @xmath85 is a family of isomorphisms @xmath86 , subject to we consider @xmath103 , the center of @xmath83 , which , we recall from ( * ? ? ?
9.1.6 ) , has as objects the pairs @xmath104 , where @xmath105 is an object in @xmath83 and @xmath106 is a natural isomorphism @xmath107 such that @xmath108 an arrow @xmath109 is an arrow @xmath110 in @xmath83 such that @xmath111 we take @xmath121 .
@xmath56 consists of the arrows @xmath122 , @xmath123 , @xmath124 , @xmath125 and the canonical maps @xmath126 , @xmath127 .
we take also @xmath128 . by proposition [ pr:32 ] , these data are included , via a map @xmath129 , in a braided category .
moreover , the braiding between @xmath130 and @xmath131 is involutive , i.e. , @xmath132 .
hence , the first item of ( * ? ? ?
* corollary 2.17 ) applies to give the desired result . | note endow canonical hopf algebra structure tensor product @xmath0 of two braided hopf algebras monoidal category isomorphism @xmath1 conditions proposition prop1.1 square tensor @xmath2 braided hopf algebra tensor product of two hopf algebras braided category braided hopf algebra new braided category replace braid @xmath3 with @xmath4 work monoidal category @xmath5 category vector spaces over field @xmath6 write @xmath7 @xmath8 for tensor product unit of @xmath5 associativity unit constraints assumed without referring reader familiar algebras coalgebras in monoidal categories algebras associative unitary coalgebras coassociative counitary algebra @xmath9 coalgebra @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 denote multiplication unit comultiplication counit specified subscript use graphic calculus for monoidal braided categories morphisms composed downwards tensor products represented horizontal concatenation identity map object represented vertical line algebra @xmath9 diagrams @xmath15 stand for multiplication map unit of @xmath9coalgebra @xmath10 comultiplication counit represented by diagrams @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 objects in @xmath19 @xmath20 arrow if @xmath17 algebra @xmath21 compatible with algebra @xmath17 @xmath22 @xmath23 if @xmath17 coalgebra @xmath21 compatible with coalgebra @xmath17 @xmath24 @xmath25 similar compatibilities when @xmath18 algebra or coalgebra braided bialgebra in @xmath5 object @xmath26 algebra coalgebra structure isomorphism @xmath27 braid of @xmath26 braid equation @xmath28 @xmath29 compatible with algebra coalgebra structures of @xmath26 @xmath30 @xmath31 algebra @xmath32 map @xmath33 inverse of identity monoid @xmath34 with convolution product @xmath26 is braided hopf algebra @xmath35 antipode of @xmath26 @xmath26 braided bialgebra in @xmath19 if braid of @xmath26 involutive @xmath37 is braided bialgebra proposition main result involutivity hypothesis can be removedprop1.1 @xmath26 @xmath38 braided bialgebras in @xmath19 @xmath39 invertible arrow if @xmath40 @xmath41 compatible with bialgebras @xmath26 @xmath42 braided bialgebra @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath26 @xmath38 braided hopf algebras @xmath42 antipode @xmath48 @xmath0 algebra coalgebra known standard check compatibility between multiplication comultiplication @xmath49\object{h } \step[1]\object{l }\operatorname{\mathsf{id }\step[1]\operatorname{id\step[1]\operatorname\mathsf\object{h }\object{l } \step[1]\object{h{l\end{tangles\begin{tangles}{lccr\step[.5]\object{h } \step[2 ] \object{l }\step[2]\object{h{l[.5{\mathsf{id}}\step[2]\cd \step[1] \step[1 ]{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ]\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ][1{\mathsf{id}}\\\cu \step[1] \step[1 ][1[.5]{\mathsf{id}}\step[2]{\mathsf{id}}\\\step[.5]\object{h } \step[2 ]{l } \step[2]{h }{l }\end{tangles } \begin{tangles}{lccr }\step[.\object{h } \step[2 ]\object{l } \step[2]{h\cd \step[1]\cd \step[1 ][1 ]\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]{\mathsf{id}}{\mathsf{id}}{\mathsf{id}}\\{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ][1[1{\mathsf{id}}\step[1{\mathsf{id}}\\{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ]{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ]{id}}\step[1{\mathsf{id}}\\{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ]{\mathsf{id}}\\\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]{{id}}{\mathsf{id}}{\mathsf{id}}{id}}{\mathsf{id}}\\\cu \step[1] \step[1 ]step[1 ]\step[.5]\object{h[2 ]\object{l\object{h }\end{tangles }\begin{tangles}{lccr }\step[.5\object{h } \step[2 ] \object{l } \step[2]\object{h{l } \\ \hh\cd \step[1]\cd \step[1 ] \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\x\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}{{id}}{{id}}\\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}{{id}}\xx{id}}{id}}\operatorname{id}}{{id}}\\ \hh\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}{id}}{{id}}\x{{id}}{id}}{{id}}\\ \hh\operatorname{{id}}\step[1]\xx\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1 ] \operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\step[1]\xx\operatorname{\mathsf{id}}\\ \hh\cu \step[1]\cu \step[1 ] [1 ] \\ \hh\step[.5\object{h } \step[2 ] \object{l }\step[2]\end{tangles } {aligned} reader prove @xmath50 satisfies braid equation compatible with @xmath51 proof last assertion straightforward aim categorical proof of proposition [ prop1.1 ] methods result to braided versions bicrossproducts matched pairs @xmath55 family of objects @xmath5 family @xmath56 isomorphisms @xmath57 braided if @xmath58 braid equations @xmath59 satisfied family string @xmath60 elements @xmath61 call @xmath62 length _ of @xmath63 @xmath64 denote string @xmath65 put @xmath66 each pair @xmath67 strings define map @xmath68 @xmath81 @xmath82 family of maps compatible with @xmath56 embed datum into braided category@xmath83 category objects pairs @xmath84 @xmath18 object @xmath5 @xmath85 family isomorphisms @xmath86 @xmath103 center @xmath83 9.1.6 objects pairs @xmath104 @xmath105 object @xmath83 @xmath106 natural isomorphism @xmath107 @xmath108 arrow @xmath109 arrow @xmath110 @xmath83 @xmath111 @xmath121 @xmath56 arrows @xmath122 @xmath123 @xmath124 @xmath125 canonical maps @xmath126 @xmath127 @xmath128 proposition data included map @xmath129 braided category braiding between @xmath130 @xmath131 involutive @xmath132 first item ( * corollary 2.17 ) applies desired result | 0.548998 | 3,076 | 1,660 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,052 | we discuss the role of differential rotation in the evolution of the @xmath0 _ r_-mode instability of a newly born , hot , rapidly - rotating neutron star .
it is shown that the amplitude of the _ r_-mode saturates in a natural way at a value that depends on the amount of differential rotation at the time the instability becomes active .
it is also shown that , independently of the saturation amplitude of the mode , the star spins down to a rotation rate that is comparable to the inferred initial rotation rates of the fastest pulsars associated with supernova remnants . | the _ r_-modes are non - radial pulsations modes of rotating stars that have the coriolis force as their restoring force and a characteristic frequency comparable to the rotation speed of the star @xcite .
these modes are driven unstable by gravitational radiation in all rotating stars @xcite
. a deeper understanding of @xmath1-modes and their astrophysical relevance requires taking into account nonlinear effects in the evolution of the @xmath1-mode instability .
one such a nonlinear effect , differential rotation induced by @xmath1-modes , has been studied by several authors .
rezzolla , lamb and shapiro @xcite were the first to suggest that differential rotation drifts of kinematical nature could be induced by @xmath1-modes , deriving an approximate analytical expression for this differential rotation .
afterwards , the existence of such drifts was confirmed numerically both in general relativistic @xcite and newtonian hydrodynamics @xcite .
recently , an exact @xmath1-mode solution , describing differential rotation of pure kinematic nature that produces large scale drifts along stellar latitudes , was found within the nonlinear theory up to second order in the mode s amplitude @xcite . in this paper
we discuss the role of differential rotation in the evolution of the @xmath0 _ r_-mode instability of a newly born , hot , rapidly - rotating neutron star .
a few years ago , owen _ et al . _
@xcite proposed a simple model to study the evolution of the @xmath1-mode instability in newly born , hot , rapidly - rotating neutron stars . within this model
, it is assumed that the time evolution of the system ( star and @xmath1-mode perturbation ) is characterized by two parameters : the angular velocity of the star , @xmath2 , and the amplitude of the mode , @xmath3 .
the total angular momentum of the star is then given by @xmath4 where the momentum of inertia @xmath5 of the equilibrium configuration is @xmath6 , with @xmath7 , and the canonical angular momentum @xmath8 of the _
r_-mode perturbation is @xmath9 , with @xmath10 . here ,
only the @xmath0 @xmath1-mode is being considered and it is assumed that the mass density @xmath11 and the pressure @xmath12 of the fluid are related by a polytropic equation of state @xmath13 , with @xmath14 such that the mass and radius of the star take the values @xmath15 and @xmath16 km , respectively . within this model
it is also assumed that the total angular momentum of the star decreases due to the emission of gravitational radiation and that the physical energy of the @xmath1-mode perturbation ( in the co - rotating frame ) increases due to the emission of gravitational radiation and decreases due to the dissipative effect of viscosity .
these assumptions lead then to a system of differential equations for the angular momentum of the star , @xmath17 , and the amplitude of the @xmath1-mode , @xmath18 : @xmath19 where @xmath20 , the gravitational - radiation and viscous timescales , @xmath21 and @xmath22 , are given by @xcite @xmath23 in the above expressions , the fiducial timescales are @xmath24 , @xmath25 and @xmath26 . for a newly born , hot
, rapidly - rotating neutron star there is an interval of relevant temperatures and angular velocities of the star for which the gravitational timescale is much smaller than the viscous timescale , @xmath27 .
therefore , for this interval of temperatures and angular velocities , we can neglect in the right - hand side of eqs .
( [ omega ] ) and ( [ alfa ] ) the terms proportional to @xmath28 and obtain the solution @xmath29 and @xmath30 . if the initial angular velocity is chosen to be @xmath31 , where @xmath32 is the keplerian angular velocity at which the star starts shedding mass at the equator , then @xmath33 , implying that the perturbation grows exponentially from an initial amplitude @xmath34 to values of order unity in just about @xmath35 @xcite .
after this first stage of evolution of the @xmath1-mode instability , the amplitude @xmath18 has to be forced , by hand , to take a certain saturation value @xmath36 ; in the second stage of the evolution it is then assumed that @xmath37 and @xmath17 is determined from the equation @xmath38 which yields the solution @xmath39}^{-1/6 } , \label{omega - k54}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath40 is the time at which occurs the transition from the first to the second stage of evolution . during the second stage of evolution , the star loses its angular momentum , spinning down to its final angular velocity . as can be seen from the above equations , the final angular velocity of the star depends critically on the saturation value of the mode s amplitude @xmath41 ; for instance ,
after one year of evolution , for @xmath31 and @xmath42 one obtains @xmath43 , while for @xmath44 the angular velocity is @xmath45 .
the fact that the growth of the mode s amplitude has to be stopped by hand at a certain saturation value introduces an element of arbitrariness into the solution , permitting , for instance , that agreement between the predicted final value of the angular velocity of the star and the value inferred from astronomical observations can always be achieved by fine - tuning the value of the saturation amplitude .
as will be seen in the next section , this arbitrariness disappears when differential rotation is taken into account .
differential rotation induced by @xmath1-modes _ does _ contribute to the physical angular momentum of the _
r_-mode perturbation @xcite .
therefore , a model for the evolution of the _ r_-mode instability should include the effect of differential rotation . here , we adopt the model of owen _ et al . _
@xcite , described in the previous section , with the important difference that the total angular momentum of the star is given by @xmath46 where the physical angular momentum of the _
r_-mode perturbation @xmath47 is @xcite @xmath48 in the previous expression , @xmath49 is a constant fixed by the choice of initial data and gives the initial amount of differential rotation associated with the _ r_-mode .
the specific case @xmath50 , for which the physical angular momentum of the _
r_-mode perturbation coincides with the canonical angular momentum , corresponds to the model of owen _ et al .
@xcite described in great detail in the previous section .
there is not , to our knowledge , any physical condition that forces @xmath49 to take such a particular value @xmath50 .
therefore , we will consider in this paper arbitrary values of @xmath49 in the interval @xmath51 .
results from the fact that one wishes to impose the condition that @xmath52 ( the initial amplitude @xmath53 is considered throughout the paper to be @xmath54 ) .
the lower limit for @xmath49 results from the fact that we do not want to saturate the amplitude of the mode by hand , a procedure needed for the case @xmath55 in order to avoid that the total angular momentum of the star becomes negative . ]
following the procedure described in the previous section , we arrive at a system of two first - order coupled differential equations determining the time evolution of the amplitude of the _ r_-mode @xmath3 and of the angular velocity of the star @xmath2 : @xmath56 \frac{\alpha}{\tau_{gr } } , \label{alfa-1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] valid when the damping effect of viscosity can be neglected relatively to the driving effect of gravitational radiation .
this system of equations was solved analytically and discussed in great detail in ref . [ 9 ] . in the initial stages of the evolution of the _ r_-mode instability @xmath18 increases exponentially @xcite , @xmath57 while for later times
, @xmath18 increases very slowly as @xmath58 the amplitude of the mode saturates in a natural way and a smooth transition between the regimes ( [ l - fase ] ) and ( [ m - fase ] ) occurs for @xmath59 seconds ( see fig .
[ fig : alpha ] ) .
this contrasts with the model of owen _ et al . _
@xcite , in which , after the short initial period of exponential growth , the amplitude @xmath18 has to be forced by hand to take a certain saturation value @xmath60 . .
the initial values of the amplitude of the mode and of the angular velocity of the star are , respectively , @xmath34 and @xmath31.,scaledwidth=50.0% ] as can be seen from eq .
( [ m - fase ] ) , the saturation value of the amplitude of the mode depends crucially on the parameter @xmath49 , namely , @xmath61 .
if @xmath62 , corresponding to a situation in which the initial amount of differential rotation is small , then the @xmath1-mode saturates at values of order unity . if , on the other hand , the initial differential rotation associated to _
r_-modes is significant , then the saturation amplitude @xmath41 can be as small as @xmath63 .
let us now turn our attention to the time evolution of the angular velocity of the star , @xmath17 . in the initial stages of the evolution of the _ r_-mode instability @xmath17 decreases as @xcite @xmath64 while for later times @xmath17 decreases slowly as @xmath65 the smooth transition between the regimes ( [ i - fase ] ) and ( [ f - fase ] ) occurs for @xmath59 seconds ( see fig .
[ fig : omega ] ) . .
the initial values of the amplitude of the mode and of the angular velocity of the star are , respectively , @xmath34 and @xmath31.,scaledwidth=50.0% ] remarkably , in the later phase of the evolution , the angular velocity @xmath17 does not depend on the value of @xmath49 and , consequently , does not depend on the saturation value of @xmath18 .
this contrasts with the results obtained in ref . [ 7 ] , where the value of @xmath17 depends critically on the choice of @xmath41 .
after about one year of evolution , when the dissipative effect of viscosity becomes dominant and starts damping the mode , the angular velocity of the star becomes @xmath66 ( for @xmath31 ) , in good agreement with the inferred initial angular velocity of the fastest pulsars associated with supernova remnants .
in this paper we have discussed the role of differential rotation in the evolution of the @xmath0 _ r_-mode instability of a newly born , hot , rapidly - rotating neutron star .
we have shown that , a few hundred seconds after the mode instability sets in , the amplitude of the _ r_-mode saturates in a natural way at values that depend on the initial amount of differential rotation associated to the @xmath1-mode .
if the initial differential rotation of _ r_-modes is small , then the _ r_-mode saturates at values of order unity .
on the other hand , if the initial differential rotation is significant , then the saturation amplitude can be as small as @xmath63 .
these low values for the saturation amplitude of _
r_-modes are of the same order of magnitude as the ones obtained in recent investigations on wind - up of magnetic fields @xcite and on nonlinear mode - mode interaction @xcite .
we have also shown that the value of the angular velocity of the star becomes , after a short period of evolution of the _ r_-mode instability , very insensitive to the saturation value of the mode s amplitude .
after about one year of evolution the angular velocity is @xmath67 ( for any @xmath41 ) , in good agreement with the inferred initial angular velocity of the fastest pulsars associated with supernova remnants .
we thank scar dias and luciano rezzolla for helpful discussions .
this work was supported in part by the _ fundao para a cincia e a tecnologia _ ( fct ) , portugal .
bt acknowledges financial support from fct through grant praxis xxi / bd/21256/99 . | r_-modes are non - radial pulsations of rotating stars coriolis force restoring force frequency comparable to rotation speed star @xcite driven unstable by gravitational radiation in stars understanding of @xmath1-modes requires nonlinear effects in evolution @xmath1-mode instability differential rotation induced by @xmath1-modes studied by authors rezzolla lamb shapiro first suggest differential rotation drifts induced by expression drifts confirmed in general relativistic newtonian hydrodynamics exact @xmath1-mode solution differential rotation kinematic large scale drifts stellar latitudes found within nonlinear theory to second order in mode s amplitude paper discuss role of differential rotation in evolution @xmath0 _ r_-mode instability of newly born hot rapidly - rotating neutron star owen et al . proposed model study evolution @xmath1-mode instability in newly born neutron stars time evolution of system characterized by two parameters angular velocity star amplitude of mode @xmath3total angular momentum star given by @xmath4 momentum inertia @xmath5 equilibrium configuration @xmath6 @xmath7 canonical angular momentum @xmath8 r-mode perturbation @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath0 @xmath1-mode considered mass density pressure fluid related by polytropic equation state @xmath13 @xmath14 mass radius star take values @xmath15 @xmath16 km total angular momentum decreases due emission gravitational radiation physical energy @xmath1-mode perturbation increases due emission gravitational radiation decreases dissipative effect viscosity assumptions lead differential equations for angular momentum star @xmath17 amplitude @xmath1-mode @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 gravitational - radiation viscous timescales @xmath21 @xmath22 given by @xmath23 fiducial timescales are @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 newly born hot rapidly - rotating neutron star interval relevant temperatures angular velocities gravitational timescale smaller than viscous timescale @xmath27 neglect eqs .omega alfa terms proportional to @xmath28 obtain solution @xmath29 @xmath30 initial angular velocity @xmath31 @xmath32 keplerian angular velocity star starts shedding mass at equator @xmath33 perturbation grows from amplitude @xmath34 to values @xmath35 @xcite after first stage evolution @xmath1-mode instability amplitude @xmath18 forced to take saturation value @xmath36 second stage @xmath37 @xmath17 determined from equation @xmath38 yields solution @xmath39}^{-1/6 - k54 @xmath40 transition from first to second stage evolution second stage star loses angular momentum spinning to final angular velocity final angular velocity star depends on saturation value mode s amplitude @xmath41 after one year evolution @xmath31 @xmath42 obtains @xmath43 @xmath44 angular velocity @xmath45 growth mode s amplitude stopped at certain saturation value introduces element arbitrariness into solution agreement between predicted final value angular velocity star astronomical observations achieved by fine - tuning saturation amplitudenext section arbitrariness disappears when differential rotation differential rotation by @xmath1-modes to physical angular momentum of r_-mode perturbation model for evolution of r_-mode instability should include effect differential rotation adopt model of owen _ et al . @xcite total angular momentum star given by @xmath46 physical angular momentum of r_-mode perturbation @xmath47 is @xcite @xmath48 @xmath49 constant fixed by initial data gives initial differential rotation r_-mode specific case @xmath50 physical angular momentum-mode perturbation coincides with canonical angular momentum corresponds to model of owen et al physical condition forces @xmath49 to take value @xmath50 consider arbitrary values of @xmath49 in interval @xmath51 results from impose condition @xmath52 initial amplitude @xmath53 @xmath54 lower limit for @xmath49 to saturate amplitude mode by hand needed for case @xmath55 avoid total angular momentum star negativefollowing procedure previous section arrive system two first - order coupled differential equations determining time evolution amplitude r_-mode @xmath3 angular velocity star @xmath2 : @xmath56 \frac{\alpha}{\tau_{gr }\label{alfa-1}\end{aligned} valid when damping effect viscosity neglected driving effect gravitational radiation equations solved analytically discussed ref . 9 initial stages evolution r_-mode instability @xmath18 increases exponentially @xcite @xmath57 later @xmath18 increases slowly @xmath58 amplitude saturates smooth transition between regimes l - fase m - fase for @xmath59 seconds see fig . contrasts with model owen et al . @xcite after initial growth amplitude @xmath18 forced to take saturation value @xmath60 initial values amplitude mode angular velocity star @xmath34 and @xmath31.=50.0% saturation value amplitude depends on parameter @xmath49 @xmath61 if @xmath62 initial differential rotation small @xmath1-mode saturates at values order unity initial differential rotation _ r_-modes significant saturation amplitude @xmath41 small as @xmath63 attention to time evolution angular velocity star @xmath17 initial stages r_-mode instability @xmath17 decreases as @xmath64 later as @xmath65 transition between regimes i - fase and f - fase for @xmath59 seconds fig . omega initial values amplitude mode angular velocity are @xmath34 and @xmath31 later phase evolution angular velocity @xmath17 depend on value @xmath49 saturation value @xmath18 contrasts with results in ref . [ 7 ] value @xmath17 depends on choice @xmath41 after one year evolution dissipative effect viscosity dominant mode angular velocity becomes @xmath66 ( for @xmath31 ) with inferred initial angular velocity of fastest pulsars supernova remnants discussed role differential rotation in evolution @xmath0 _ r_-mode instability of newly born hot rapidly - rotating neutron star seconds after mode instability amplitude _ r_-mode saturates at values on initial differential rotation @xmath1-modeinitial differential rotation of r-modes small saturates at values order unity differential rotation significant saturation amplitude small as @xmath63 low values saturation amplitude same as investigations on wind - up magnetic fields nonlinear mode - mode interaction shown angular velocity star after evolution r-mode instability insensitive to saturation amplitude after one year evolution angular velocity @xmath67 ( @xmath41 ) agreement with initial velocity fastest pulsars supernova remnants thank scar dias luciano rezzolla for discussions work supported by fundao para cincia tecnologia _ fct portugal acknowledges financial support fct through grant praxis xxi / bd/21256/99 | 0.434849 | 2,658 | 1,380 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,064 | we have performed first - principle calculations of the electronic structure and exchange couplings for the nanotube compound na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 using the lda+u approach .
our results show that while the intra - ring exchange interactions are mainly antiferromagnetic , the inter - ring couplings are _
ferromagnetic_. we argue that this is a consequence of the strong hybridization between filled and vacant 3d vanadium orbitals due to the low symmetry of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 , which results into strong - and often dominant - ferromagnetic contributions to the total exchange interaction between vanadium atoms . a comparison with results of previous works is included . | the values of the exchange interactions between the magnetic moments carried by metallic atoms constitute a crucial piece of information for the theoretical investigation of the magnetic properties ( magnetization , susceptibility , specific heat , etc . ) of low - dimensional quantum s=@xmath3 systems , for instance vanadates.@xcite there are several ways to obtain this information .
one of them is based on the estimation of the exchange integrals from the hopping parameters obtained by fitting the band - structure with an extended tight - binding model @xcite or through a downfolding @xcite and projection @xcite procedure .
the first - principle method for the calculation of the exchange interaction parameters was proposed by lichtenstein _
@xcite within this scheme the exchange interaction parameters are determined by calculating the second variation of the total energy @xmath4 with respect to small deviations of the magnetic moments from the collinear magnetic configuration .
the first theoretical investigations @xcite of the magnetic couplings of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 , a mott insulator with the rather exotic topology of a nanotube , were based on the former method .
they relied on different estimates of the hopping integrals and lead to conflicting results .
whangbo and koo @xcite have employed a spin dimer analysis in order to estimate the relative magnitudes of the spin exchange interaction parameters expected for na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 .
they have concluded that na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 could be described by six helical spin chains and should show a gap in the spin excitations .
dasgupta _ et al .
_ @xcite have performed the first _ ab - initio _ microscopic analysis of the electronic and magnetic properties of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 using linear augmented plane wave ( lapw ) method.@xcite since , due to the geometry , the 3d _ xy _ bands of the vanadium atoms are well separated from other states , these authors have derived a v 3d _ xy _ orbital model hamiltonian using the downfolding procedure within the framework of the n - th order muffin - tin orbital method.@xcite based on the calculated hopping parameters between _ xy _ orbitals , they have estimated the exchange interactions between vanadium atoms in na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 using standard superexchange theory and proposed an effective heisenberg model . the calculated magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature determined by exact diagonalization of finite clusters is in good agreement with experimental data . in this paper
we report a detailed investigation of the isotropic exchange interactions in na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 based on a first - principle lda+u calculation of its electronic and magnetic structure .
the exchange interactions between vanadium atoms were calculated using the green - function method developed by lichtenstein _
@xcite in order to provide a microscopic explanation of the resulting exchange interactions , which are _ qualitatively _ different from previous estimates , we have used an extended kugel - khomskii model that includes the hybridization between filled and vacant orbitals using the hopping parameters calculated by the projection procedure .
we conclude that estimating the exchange interactions of a system with a very exotic geometry such as na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 within simple superexchange between _ xy _ orbitals with on - site coulomb interaction is not possible .
the paper is organized as follows . in section
ii we shortly describe the crystal structure of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 and present the results of the lda calculation . in section iii , we present the results of the lda+u calculation , and we discuss the origin of the exchange interaction parameters . in section iv , we briefly summarize our results .
a simplified view of the crystal structure of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 is presented in fig.1 .
the main building blocks of the crystal structure are distorted vanadium - oxygen pyramids .
vanadium atoms are roughly in the center of a pyramid which is built by five oxygen atoms .
there are three types of vanadium atoms v1-v2-v3 which form a basic structure unit .
three of these units connected by edges are needed to form a ring of the tube .
the lowest energy orbital is the v 3d orbital of @xmath5 symmetry @xcite ( using a convention where the axes of the coordinate system are directed towards the oxygen ions in the plane ) , which is the orbital whose lobes point away from the oxygen .
more detailed information about the crystal structure of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 can be found in ref .. v@xmath1o@xmath2 .
equivalent interaction paths have the same color .
the tube structure is made by putting m and n into contact.,scaledwidth=50.0% ] the electronic structure calculation of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 was performed using the tight binding linear - muffin - tin - orbital atomic sphere approximation ( tb - lmto - asa ) method in terms of the conventional local - density approximation .
@xcite the band structure of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 obtained from lda calculations is presented in fig.2 .
there are 18 bands near the fermi level which have @xmath5 symmetry ( since there are 18 vanadium atoms in the unit cell ) and are separated from the other v 3d bands as well as from the 2p oxygen bands .
the corresponding partial densities of states are shown in fig.3 .
v@xmath1o@xmath2 near the fermi level ( 0 ev).,scaledwidth=45.0% ] six bands have an energy significantly lower than the others , which are located near the fermi level .
two of them have an energy near -0.7 ev , while the other four are located between -0.3 and -0.4 ev .
such a band location of active orbitals ( occupied by electrons ) is unusual in comparison with the band structure of other s=@xmath3 transition metal compounds .
@xcite these bands are in good agreement with those presented in ref . . with one subset of energy bands well separated from the rest
, one can expect that a tight - binding model with a single _ xy_-orbital per v site ( i.e. a 18-band model ) will provide a good approximation to the full band structure close to the fermi level . and the total density of 3d states , respectively.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] for this we express the lda band structure results in terms of the low - energy model hamiltonian @xmath6 where _ i _ and _ j _ are site indexes , @xmath7 is the effective hopping integral between sites @xmath8 and @xmath9 , and @xmath10 is the operator which creates an electron with a spin @xmath11 in a state with a wannier function centered at the _ i_th atom . in order to obtain the hopping parameters @xmath7 , we have employed the projection procedure .
@xcite according to this procedure , the hopping integrals in the wannier function basis @xmath12 ( _ m _ is orbital index , _
i _ is site index ) , which is defined as the fourier transform of a certain linear combination of bloch functions @xmath13
( @xmath14 is the band index and k is the wave - vector in reciprocal space ) can be written in the general form : @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the eigenvalue in the basis of linearized muffin - tin orbitals .
the calculated inter - ring and intra - ring hopping parameters between 3d _ xy _ orbitals of vanadium atoms are presented in table i. .calculated hopping integrals between _ xy _ orbitals of vanadium atoms for the one - orbital model and estimated exchange interaction parameters @xmath17 ( @xmath18 , @xmath19 ) of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 ( in mev ) . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] the values of the crystal - field splittings of different types of vanadium atoms obtained by using the projection procedure are presented in table v. if we take for the the splitting @xmath20 the average value of the crystal field splittings , namely 2 ev , the ferromagnetic contributions to the total exchange interactions estimated within the extended kugel - khomskii model are about 2 times smaller than those obtained using the green function method ( presented in table iv ) .
a physically more appealing approximation is to use in the model calculation the smallest value of the crystal field splitting , which corresponds to the first excitation energy for an electron between occupied and vacant orbitals . in our case
this splitting is about 1.1 ev .
the calculated contributions to the total exchange interactions between vanadium atoms for @xmath20 = 1.1 ev are presented in table vi .
one can see that we can qualitatively reproduce the anti- and ferromagnetic contributions to the total exchange interactions between vanadium atoms using this simple model except for bond ( v2 - 9)-(v3 - 18 ) . in order to obtain full qualitative agreement with the green function method
results one should use @xmath20 = 0.8 ev , which is slightly less than the crystal - field splitting calculated by the projection procedure .
we have investigated the electronic structure and the microscopic origin of the exchange interactions of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 . based on our lda+u results
we predict that the value of the energy gap in electronic excitation spectra in this system is about 1 ev . the different contributions to the exchange interaction parameters have been calculated using the first - principle green - function method proposed by a.i . lichtenstein .
on the basis of the obtained results we argue that it is _ not _ correct to assume that the exchange interaction which is due to hybridization between active orbitals is a good approximation to the total exchange interaction between vanadium atoms for na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 .
according to the present results , the main interactions are antiferromagnetic along the ring , ferromagnetic between the rings , and of the same order of magnitude .
the resulting heisenberg model is strongly frustrated , with no obvious starting point for perturbation theory , hence no simple way to predict its properties .
such an analysis is left for future investigation .
we would like to thank a.i .
lichtenstein , i.v .
solovyev , and m.a .
korotin for helpful discussions .
the hospitality of the institute of theoretical physics of epfl is gratefully acknowledged .
this work is supported by intas young scientist fellowship program ref .
nr 04 - 83 - 3230 , netherlands organization for scientific research through nwo 047.016.005 , the scientific program `` development of scientific potential of universities '' section 3.3 project code 315 , russian foundation for basic research grant rffi 04 - 02 - 16096 and rffi 03 - 02 - 39024 .
the calculations were performed on the computer cluster of `` university center of parallel computing '' of ustu - upi .
we also acknowledge the financial support of the swiss national fund and of manep .
korotin , i.s .
elfimov , v.i .
anisimov , m. troyer , and d.i .
khomskii , phys .
* 83 , * 1387 ( 1999 ) ; m.a .
korotin , v.i .
anisimov , t. saha - dasgupta and i. dasgupta , j. phys . : condens . matter .
* 12 , * 113 ( 2000 ) . | exchange interactions between magnetic moments metallic atoms crucial for investigation magnetic properties heat of low - dimensional quantum s=@xmath3 systems vanadates several ways obtain information one estimation exchange integrals from hopping parameters fitting band - structure with extended tight - binding model or downfolding projection procedure first method calculation exchange interaction parameters proposed by lichtenstein calculating second variation of total energy @xmath4 small deviations magnetic moments from collinear magnetic configuration first investigations of magnetic couplings of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 mott insulator nanotube based on former method conflicting results whangbo and koo employed spin dimer analysis spin exchange interaction parameters for na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 concluded described by six helical spin chains show gap in spin excitations dasgupta et al performed first microscopic analysis of electronic magnetic properties of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 using linear augmented plane wave methodgeometry 3d _ xy bands vanadium atoms separated states authors derived 3d _ xy orbital model hamiltonian downfolding procedure n - th order muffin - tin orbital method calculated hopping parameters orbitals estimated exchange interactions between vanadium atoms in na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 standard superexchange theory proposed heisenberg model calculated magnetic susceptibility function temperature diagonalization clusters with experimental data paper detailed investigation isotropic exchange interactions in na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 first - principle lda+u calculation electronic magnetic structure exchange interactions vanadium atoms calculated green - function method lichtenstein used extended kugel - khomskii model hybridization between filled vacant orbitals hopping parameters calculated estimating exchange interactions system exotic geometry na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 simple superexchange between xy orbitals not possible paper organized section ii crystal structure of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 results lda calculation section iii results lda+u calculation discuss origin exchange interaction parameters section iv summarize resultssimplified crystal structure of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 presented in.1 main building blocks are distorted vanadium - oxygen pyramids vanadium atoms center of pyramid built by five oxygen atoms three types vanadium atoms v1-v2-v3 form basic structure unit three units connected by edges form ring tube lowest energy orbital is v 3d orbital of @xmath5 symmetry towards oxygen ions lobes point away from oxygen detailed information crystal structure in ref v@xmath1o@xmath2 equivalent interaction paths same color tube structure made by m and n into contact=50.0% electronic structure calculation of using tight binding linear - muffin - tin - orbital atomic sphere approximation method band structure of in fig.2 18 bands near fermi level @xmath5 symmetry vanadium atoms separated from other v 3d bands 2p oxygen bands partial densities of states shown in fig.3 v@xmath1o@xmath2 near fermi level six bands have energy lower than near fermi leveltwo energy near -0.7 ev four between -0.3 and -0.4 ev band location of active orbitals occupied electrons unusual band structure transition metal compounds bands with ref . energy bands separated tight - binding model single xy_-orbital per v site 18-band model approximation full band structure close fermi level total density of 3d states=45.0% lda band structure low - energy model hamiltonian @xmath6 i _ j _ site indexes @xmath7 effective hopping integral between sites operator electron with spin @xmath11 wannier function at _ i_th atom hopping parameters @xmath7 projection procedure hopping integrals wannier function basis @xmath12 m orbital index i site index fourier transform of linear combination bloch functions @xmath13 band index k wave - vector reciprocal space @xmath15 @xmath16 eigenvalue in basis of linearized muffin - tin orbitals calculated inter - intra - ring hopping parameters between 3d _ xy _ orbitals of vanadium atoms in table i.calculated hopping integrals between xy orbitals vanadium atoms for one - orbital model estimated exchange interaction parameters @xmath17 ) of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 values crystal - field splittings of vanadium atoms in table v splitting @xmath20 average 2 ev ferromagnetic contributions to total exchange interactions kugel - model 2 times smaller than green function method table iv approximation smallest value crystal field splitting first excitation energy electron between occupied vacant orbitals splitting about 1.1 ev calculated contributions to exchange interactions for @xmath20 = 1.1 ev in table vi reproduce anti- ferromagnetic contributions model except for bond ( v2 - 9)-(v3 - 18 ) agreement green function method use @xmath20 = 0.8 ev slightly less than crystal - field splitting investigated electronic structure microscopic origin of exchange interactions of na@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 energy gap in electronic excitation spectra about 1 ev contributions to exchange interaction parameters calculated using first - principle green - function methodlichtenstein results argue not assume exchange interaction due hybridization active orbitals vanadium atoms@xmath0v@xmath1o@xmath2 main interactions antiferromagnetic along ring ferromagnetic between rings same magnitude heisenberg model frustrated no starting point perturbation theory no predict properties analysis for future investigation thank lichtenstein solovyev korotin discussions hospitality institute theoretical physics epfl acknowledged supported by intas young scientist fellowship program 04 - 83 - 3230 netherlands organization scientific research nwo 047.016.005 program development scientific potential universities 3.3 project code 315 russian foundation basic research grant rffi 04 - 02 - 16096 03 - 02 - 39024 calculations university center parallel computing ustu - upi acknowledge financial support swiss national fund manep korotin elfimov anisimov troyer khomskii phys . * 83 , * 1387 ( 1999 ) korotin saha - dasgupta dasgupta phys . condens . matter * 12 113 ( 2000 ) | 0.358071 | 2,580 | 1,317 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,070 | the geometry of a light wavefront , evolving from a initial flat wavefront in the 3-space associated with a post - newtonian relativistic spacetime , is studied numerically by means of the ray tracing method . for a discretization of the bidimensional light wavefront
, a surface fitting technique is used to determine the curvature of this surface .
the relationship between the intrinsic curvature of the wavefront and the change of the arrival time at different points on the earth is also numerically discussed . | according to einstein s theory of general relativity , a generic gravitational field has , at a time , three main effects on light : the shapiro time delay , the bending of rays and the curvature of wavefronts .
the gravitational field acts respectively as a retarder delaying a light wavefront , as a prism tilting a light wavefront , and as a lens curving a light wavefront . in special relativity ,
time delays can be also induced by inertial motion of the observer or the source as in the doppler effect and uniform motion of a observer can result in aberration , i.e. , an apparent change in the position of the source .
hence , the curvature of a initially plane light wavefront by a gravity field is a purely general relativistic effect that has no special relativistic analogue . in order to obtain an experimental measurement of the curvature of a wave front ,
samuel @xcite proposed a method based on the relation between the differences of arrival time recorded at four points on the earth and the volume of a parallelepiped determined by four points in the curved wavefront surface .
we will establish a discretized model of the wavefront surface by means of a regular triangulation for the study of the curvature(s ) of this surface .
the main methods and results have been recently published in @xcite , in this work we will only expose a summary of them .
let us consider a spacetime @xmath0 corresponding to a weak gravitational field determined by a metric tensor given in a global coordinate system @xmath1 by @xmath2 where the coordinate components of the metric deviation @xmath3 are : @xmath4 here @xmath5 represents the gravitational constant of the sun , located at @xmath6 , and @xmath7 represents the vacuum light speed .
the null geodesics , @xmath8 satisfy the following equations ( see @xcite ) : @xmath9\dot{z}^k\nonumber\\ & & -(h_{44,k}\delta^a_l+h_{ak , l}-{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}h_{kl , a})\dot{z}^k\dot{z}^l \nonumber\\ & & -(c^{-1}h_{4k , j}-{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}c^{-2}h_{jk , t})\dot{z}^j\dot{z}^k\dot{z}^a,\label{pn1a}\\[.1 in ] 0 & = & g_{\alpha\beta}\dot{z}^\alpha\dot{z}^\beta.\label{pn1b}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , in the first equation , the first and third terms in the right are of order @xmath10 , while the remaining terms are @xmath11 .
the second equation is the isotropy constraint satisfied by the null geodesics .
we consider a flat initial surface @xmath12 far from the sun formed by points @xmath13 ( with @xmath14 ) in an asymptotically cartesian coordinate system @xmath15 . for the discretization of @xmath12 a triangulation
is constructed in such a form that each vertex is represented by a complex number of the set : @xmath16 the complex plane and the plane @xmath12 may be identified by means of the mapping @xmath17 .
thus a regular triangulation @xmath18 of the initial wavefront @xmath12 is determined . at each vertex in @xmath18 a photon @xmath19 with velocity @xmath20 is located .
the null geodesics equation may be written as a first order differential system @xmath21 , in phase space @xmath22 , which determines in @xmath23 ( the quotient space of @xmath24 by the global timelike vector field @xmath25 associated to the global coordinate system used in the post - newtonian formalism ) a flow : @xmath26 . for each time @xmath27 the image of @xmath12 under the flow @xmath28 determines a curved wavefront @xmath29 .
the initial triangulation by @xmath18 induces a triangulation on the final wavefront @xmath29 , whose vertices we enumerate using the same labels used for the corresponding vertices in @xmath12 .
+ let @xmath30 be a _ normal coordinate system _ with pole at the point @xmath31 and associated normal reference frame @xmath32 . under the coordinate transformation @xmath33 , from post - newtonian to
normal coordinates , the metric tensor @xmath34 on the space @xmath23 is determined ( up to terms of first order in @xmath35 ) from @xmath36 by @xmath37 to compute differential magnitudes of the wavefront surface corresponding to the mesh @xmath18 at each inner vertex @xmath38 we consider the 1ring @xmath39_{j=1,\dots , j , k=0,\dots,5}$ ] formed by the six vertices @xmath40 closest to @xmath41 : for each 1ring @xmath42 $ ] one obtains on the mesh @xmath18 the image 1ring @xmath43 $ ] under the flow @xmath44 . in a neighbourhood of the image point @xmath45 the wavefront can be approximated by a least - squares fitting of the data @xmath43 $ ] as the quadric @xmath46 : @xmath47 using adapted normal coordinates @xmath48 .
using coordinates @xmath49 adapted to the quadric @xmath46 : the metric @xmath50 on @xmath23 induces a metric on @xmath51 of the form @xmath52 by means of a generalized gauss formula , the difference of sectional curvatures @xmath53 and @xmath54 associated with the plane generated by the tangent vectors @xmath55 , in @xmath56 and @xmath23 respectively , is the relative sectional curvature @xmath57 ( see @xcite ) : @xmath58 whereas the mean curvature @xmath59 is determined by half the trace of the second fundamental form @xmath60 : @xmath61
the ray tracing has been carried out using an integrator based on the classic taylor series method for ordinary differential equations ( see @xcite ) .
this integrator presents the following advantages : allows the control of both the order and the step size employed in the method . in this integrator
one may use extended arithmetic precision for the highly accurate computation required in this problem .
( precision of @xmath62 binary digits and a tolerance @xmath63 are used to solve this problem . ) at each step the null constraint equation is preserved .
+ hereafter , we consider the simplest gravitational model generated by a static sun , considered as a point . however , it can be applied to more complex and realistic gravitational fields of the solar system , as considered in @xcite .
we now apply the ray tracing method to a light wavefront region propagating along a tubular neighborhood around the @xmath64-axis and where the inner and outer hexagons have radii of lengths @xmath65 and @xmath66 , respectively .
the initial flat wave surface @xmath12 , perpendicular to the @xmath64-axis , is positioned at -100 a.u .. the wavefront @xmath67 is then determined after a trip of 101 a.u . ,
i.e. , at the position of the earth . remember that the focal length for a light ray grazing an opaque sun is located at 548.30 a.u . from the sun .
+ in figure [ figure ] , the surface @xmath67 at the time when the wavefront arrives at the earth is shown using a gray - scale to represent the relative sectional curvature ( note we have used a different scale on the @xmath64axis ) .
one sees in this figure that the absolute value of the relative sectional curvature function defined on @xmath67 increases as the distance between the photon and the @xmath64axis decreases .
suppose four receiving stations located at four points on an earth hemisphere .
the arrival time differences between these stations depend on the curvature of the wavefront . assumed known the measurements of arrival times corresponding to four points @xmath68 on the wavefront it is possible to determine an approximation of the wavefront curvature in a region far enough from the sun ( say the earth ) , without resorting to the ray tracing method .
an estimation of the gaussian curvature of the wavefront surface can be obtained using the notion of the wald curvature of a metric space established in distance geometry ( see @xcite ) that in the case of 2-dimensional manifolds agrees with the gaussian curvature .
the wald curvature is determined as the limit of the embedding curvatures of metric quadruples isometrically embedded in surfaces of constant curvature ( the euclidean plane @xmath69 , the 2sphere @xmath70 or the hyperbolic space @xmath71 ) .
+ in the hyperbolic plane @xmath72 of curvature @xmath73 , represented by the blumenthal model ( @xcite ) we consider the metric quadruple associated with the points @xmath74 assuming that the geometry of the 3space in the vicinity of the earth is euclidean .
the wald curvature associated to the chosen quadruple @xmath74 prove to be @xmath75 this result gives an approximation of the total curvature of the wavefront surface under the assumption that locally this surface may be identified with a hyperbolic plane in which the quadruple considered is isometrically embedded .
9 samuel j 2004 _ class .
quantum grav .
_ , * 21 * , l83l88 .
san miguel a , vicente f and pascual - snchez j f 2009 _ class .
quantum grav .
_ , * 26 * , 235004 .
brumberg v a 1991 _ essential relativistic celestial mechanics _ ,
( bristol : adam hilger ) .
do carmo m p 1992 _ riemannian geometry _ ( boston : birkhuser ) .
jorba and zou m 2005 _ experimental mathematics _ * 14 * , 99 - 117 .
klioner s a and peip m 2003 _ astron .
astrophys . _ * 410 * , 10631074 .
blumenthal l m 1970 _ theory and applications of distance geometry_. ( new york : chelsea publishing company , 2nd edition ) . | einstein s theory relativity gravitational field has three effects on light shapiro time delay bending of rays curvature of wavefronts gravitational field acts as retarder prism tilting lens curving in special relativity time delays induced by inertial motion observer doppler uniform motion in aberration change position curvature of plane light wavefront by gravity field is general relativistic effect no special relativistic analogue measurement curvature samuel @xcite proposed method relation between differences arrival time at four points volume of parallelepiped by four points in curved wavefront surface establish discretized model of wavefront surface regular triangulation for study curvature main methods results published in @xcite summary consider spacetime @xmath0 to weak gravitational field determined by metric tensor in global coordinate system @xmath1 @xmath2 coordinate components of metric deviation @xmath3 are @xmath4 @xmath5 represents gravitational constant of sun @xmath6 @xmath7 vacuum light speednull geodesics @xmath8 satisfy equations @xmath9\dot{z}^k\nonumber\\(h{44,k}\delta^a_l+h_{ak_{kl\dot{z}^k{z}^l\nonumber\\{-1}h_{4k{-2}h_{jk\dot{z}^j\dot{z}^k{z}^a\label{pn1a}\\\alpha\beta\dot{z}^\alpha{z}^\beta\label{pn1b}{aligned} first equation first third terms @xmath10 remaining @xmath11 second equation isotropy constraint null geodesics flat initial surface @xmath12 sun points @xmath13 @xmath14 asymptotically cartesian coordinate system @xmath15 discretization @xmath12 triangulation constructed each vertex represented complex number @xmath16 complex plane @xmath12 identified mapping @xmath17 regular triangulation @xmath18 initial wavefront @xmath12 determined each vertex @xmath18 photon @xmath19 velocity @xmath20 locatednull geodesics equation first order differential system @xmath21 phase space @xmath22 determines @xmath23 global timelike vector field @xmath25 global coordinate system post - newtonian formalism flow @xmath26 @xmath27 image @xmath12 determines curved wavefront @xmath29 initial triangulation @xmath18 induces triangulation final wavefront @xmath29 vertices enumerate labels @xmath30 normal coordinate system pole point @xmath31 normal reference frame @xmath32 coordinate transformation @xmath33 post - newtonian normal coordinates tensor @xmath34 space @xmath23 determined @xmath36 @xmath37 differential magnitudes wavefront surface mesh @xmath18 inner vertex 1ring @xmath39 formed six vertices @xmath40 closest @xmath41 each 1ring @xmath42 obtains image 1ring @xmath43 flow @xmath44 image point @xmath45 wavefront approximated least - squares fitting data quadric @xmath46 @xmath47 adapted normal coordinates @xmath48coordinates @xmath49 adapted to quadric @xmath46 metric @xmath50 @xmath23 induces metric @xmath51 form @xmath52 generalized gauss formula difference of sectional curvatures @xmath53 @xmath54 plane tangent vectors @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath23 is relative sectional curvature @xmath57 : @xmath58 mean curvature @xmath59 determined by half trace second fundamental form @xmath60 : @xmath61 ray tracing integrator classic taylor series method for differential equations integrator control order step size extended arithmetic precision accurate computation precision @xmath62 binary digits @xmath63 each step null constraint equation preserved simplest gravitational model static sun to complex gravitational fields solar system ray tracing method to light wavefront region tubular neighborhood around @xmath64-axis inner outer hexagons have radii lengths @xmath65 and @xmath66 initial flat wave surface @xmath12 perpendicular to @xmath64-axis positioned at -100 a.u wavefront @xmath67 determined after trip 101 a.u position earthfocal length for light ray sun at 548.30 a.u . from sun in figure surface @xmath67 wavefront arrives at earth shown using gray - scale relative sectional curvature different scale on @xmath64axis absolute value relative sectional curvature on @xmath67 increases as distance between photon and @xmath64axis decreases four receiving stations at four points earth hemisphere arrival time differences depend on curvature wavefront arrival times four points @xmath68 wavefront to determine wavefront curvature in region far from sun without ray tracing estimation of gaussian curvature wavefront surface wald curvature of metric space distance geometry agrees with gaussian curvature curvature limit of embedding curvatures of metric quadruples in surfaces of constant curvature euclidean plane @xmath69 2sphere @xmath70 hyperbolic space @xmath71 in hyperbolic plane @xmath72 of curvature @xmath73 blumenthal model metric quadruple associated with points @xmath74 geometry 3space earth euclideanwald curvature quadruple @xmath74 @xmath75 result approximation total curvature wavefront surface hyperbolic plane quadruple isometrically embedded samuel j 2004 quantum grav 21 l83l88 san miguel vicente pascual - snchez j 2009 quantum grav 26 235004 brumberg 1991 relativistic celestial mechanics bristol adam hilger carmo m p 1992 riemannian geometry boston birkhuser zou m 2005 experimental mathematics 14 99 - 117 klioner peip m 2003 astron astrophys. 410 10631074 blumenthal l 1970 theory distance geometry new york chelsea publishing 2nd edition | 0.352107 | 2,256 | 1,219 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,073 | a green - function theory for the dynamic spin susceptibility in the square - lattice spin-@xmath0 antiferromagnetic compass - heisenberg model employing a generalized mean - field approximation is presented .
the theory describes magnetic long - range order ( lro ) and short - range order ( sro ) at arbitrary temperatures .
the magnetization , nel temperature @xmath1 , specific heat , and uniform static spin susceptibility @xmath2 are calculated self - consistently . as the main result
, we obtain lro at finite temperatures in two dimensions , where the dependence of @xmath1 on the compass - model interaction is studied .
we find that @xmath1 is close to the experimental value for ba@xmath3iro@xmath4 .
the effects of sro are discussed in relation to the temperature dependence of @xmath2
. published in : eur .
phys .
j. * b 88 * , 148 ( 2015 ) . | the study of the quantum compass model ( cm ) for strongly correlated transition - metal compounds with orbital degrees of freedom and strong spin - orbit coupling is an active field of research ( for a review , see ref .
in particular , quantum and thermodynamic phase transitions in the two - dimensional ( 2d ) cm were studied in refs .
@xcite , where the directional - ordering transition of the 2d ising universality class was found for the symmetric cm . depending on the method of numerical computation
, the temperature of the phase transition for the quantum cm was found in the range @xmath5 ( in the units of the cm exchange interaction ) @xcite . in refs .
@xcite the compass - heisenberg ( ch ) model was introduced extending the cm by the 2d antiferromagnetic ( af ) heisenberg model , and the ground state and excited states of the ch model were analyzed . for 5d transition - metal compounds with a strong spin - orbit coupling , such as sr@xmath3iro@xmath4 and ba@xmath3iro@xmath4 with the nel temperatures @xmath6k and @xmath7k , respectively , ( see , e.g. , ref .
@xcite ) , an effective af heisenberg model for pseudospins @xmath8 with the cm anisotropy was derived in ref .
recently we have calculated the spin - wave excitation spectrum and @xmath1 for a layered ch model by means of the random phase approximation ( rpa ) @xcite ( see also refs .
an important issue is the description of magnetic long - range order ( lro ) and short - range order ( sro ) and of the thermodynamics at arbitrary temperatures by a theory going beyond rpa . in this paper
we employ a generalized mean - field approximation ( gmfa ) to the 2d ch model that is based on the equation - of - motion method for green functions . in the framework of a more general theory for the dynamic spin susceptibility including the self energy @xcite
, the neglect of the self - energy corresponds to the gmfa .
this approximation , for spin - rotation invariant ( sri ) systems also named sri green - function method ( rgm ) , has been successfully applied to several quantum spin systems ( see , e.g. , refs .
@xcite ) .
we start from the spin-@xmath0 ch model on the square lattice , @xmath9 where @xmath10 .
the nearest - neighbor ( nn ) exchange interaction parameters are @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 , @xmath15 , and @xmath16 .
we assume @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
the symmetric formulation of the model ( [ eq1 ] ) allows us to get expressions for quantities with indexes @xmath19 @xmath20 from those indicated by the index @xmath21 by cyclic permutation .
to evaluate the thermodynamic quantities in the ch model , we calculate the dynamic spin susceptibility @xmath22 ( @xmath23 denotes the retarded two - time commutator green function @xcite ) . using the equations of motion up to the second step , we obtain @xmath24 , where @xmath25 \rangle$ ] , @xmath26 $ ] , and @xmath27 , h]$ ] . for the model ( [ eq1 ] )
the moment @xmath28 is given by the exact expression @xmath29 . \label{eq2}\ ] ] here , @xmath30 with @xmath31 denote the spin correlation functions .
the second derivatives @xmath32 are approximated in the spirit of the scheme employed in refs .
that means , taking the site representation , in @xmath33 we decouple the products of three spin operators on different lattice sites along nn sequences @xmath34 as @xmath35 where the vertex renormalization parameters @xmath36 and @xmath37 are attached to nn and further - distant correlation functions , respectively . after some algebra
, we obtain @xmath38 and @xmath39 with the squared spin - excitation energy @xmath40 , \label{eq6}\ ] ] where @xmath41 , \label{eq7}\ ] ] @xmath42 the appearance of af lro at @xmath43 is reflected in our theory by the divergence of @xmath44 corresponding to the closure of the spectrum gap at the af ordering vector @xmath45 , @xmath46 . in the lro phase the correlation functions @xmath47 are written as @xcite @xmath48 with @xmath49 calculated from the green function ( [ eq5 ] ) by the spectral theorem , @xmath50 , \label{eq11}\ ] ] where @xmath51 .
the condensation part @xmath52 arising from @xmath53 determines the staggered magnetization @xmath54 that is defined by @xmath55 in the paramagnetic phase , we have @xmath56 and @xmath57 .
the nn correlation functions are related to the internal energy @xmath58 per site , @xmath59 , from which the specific heat @xmath60 may be obtained . to calculate the thermodynamic properties , the correlation functions
@xmath61 , the vertex parameters @xmath62 appearing in the spectrum @xmath63 , and the condensation term @xmath52 in the lro phase have to be determined .
besides eqs .
( [ eq10 ] ) and ( [ eq11 ] ) for calculating the correlators , we have the sum rules @xmath64 and the lro conditions @xmath53 ; that is , we have more parameters than equations . to obtain a closed system of self - consistency equations ,
we proceed as follows . as in our recent study of the model ( [ eq1 ] ) by means of the rpa and linear spin - wave theory ( lswt ) @xcite
, we consider an anisotropic cm interaction , @xmath65 , so that the lro phase is an easy - axis af with the magnetization along the x axis .
accordingly , we put @xmath66 , where we can also consider the limiting case @xmath67 .
then , at t = 0 , for determining the seven quantities @xmath62 and @xmath68 , besides the three sum rules and the three lro conditions , we need an additional condition . to this end , we adjust the ground - state magnetization @xmath69 to the expression obtained in lswt , @xmath70 , where the correlation function is given by eq .
( 17 ) of ref .
@xcite with the sublattice magnetization @xmath71 substituted by the spin @xmath8 . in the lro phase , @xmath72 , we have found that the ansatz @xmath73 , where @xmath74 with @xmath75 , is a reasonable approximation , as will be demonstrated in the appendix for the heisenberg limit . at @xmath76 , for calculating @xmath62 we use the sum rules and the condition @xmath77 .
because , as an input , we take the ground - state magnetization in lswt that describes the lro quite well for small enough cm interaction @xmath78 as compared to the exchange interaction @xmath79 , we present results in the region @xmath80 .
as described in sec .
ii , the thermodynamic quantities are calculated from the numerical solution of a coupled system of nonlinear algebraic self - consistency equations .
first we consider our results on the magnetic lro . in the heisenberg limit
we have no lro at finite temperature , in accord with the mermin - wagner theorem . in fig .
[ fig1 ] the nel temperature @xmath1 as function of @xmath81 for two ratios of @xmath82 is plotted .
our results for @xmath1 remarkably deviate from those found in rpa @xcite . for @xmath83 ,
@xmath1 exhibits qualitatively the same dependence on @xmath81 , but is appreciably reduced as compared to rpa . for the symmetric cm interaction @xmath84 , our theory yields a finite nel temperature that increases with @xmath85 , whereas in rpa , @xmath86 was found .
we ascribe these differences to a better description of strong spin fluctuations by our green - function theory going one step beyond rpa .
note that in the rpa @xcite the fluctuations of the @xmath87 component of spin are not taken into account . generally speaking , from our results
we conclude that the cm interaction added to the heisenberg model favors magnetic lro at finite @xmath88 in two dimensions . comparing our findings to experiment
, we consider the compound ba@xmath3iro@xmath4 , where quantum chemistry calculations @xcite yield the parameters @xmath89mev , @xmath90mev @xmath91 , and a very small interplane coupling @xmath92 that is not taken into account here . in fig .
[ fig2 ] the magnetization @xmath93 as function of @xmath88 is plotted . at @xmath94 , @xmath95
is enhanced by @xmath85 as compared to the value in the heisenberg limit ( @xmath96 ) .
the second - order phase transition occurs at @xmath97k which agrees rather well with the experimental value @xmath98k . at @xmath1 the specific heat ( inset to fig .
[ fig2 ] ) reveals a cusplike singularity .
such a structure at the transition temperature was also found in layered magnets treated by rgm in ref .
@xcite . from the analysis given there
we suggest that also here the height of the cusp may be underestimated .
it is desirable to compare our result for @xmath99 to experimental data which , however , are not yet available . finally , we discuss the uniform static spin susceptibility @xmath100 depicted in fig .
[ fig3 ] for the symmetric cm interaction , which reflects the behavior of magnetic sro . considering the heisenberg limit ,
the increase of @xmath2 with temperature is caused by the decrease of af sro , i.e. , of the spin stiffness against the orientation along a homogeneous magnetic field .
since the sro is less pronounced at higher @xmath88 , @xmath2 reveals a maximum near the exchange energy and a crossover to the high - temperature curie - weiss behavior . in the paramagnetic phase for @xmath101 ,
the susceptibilities @xmath102 are lowered as compared with the heisenberg limit due to the @xmath85-induced enhancement of af sro .
moreover , the susceptibility @xmath103 is reduced as compared with @xmath104 , because the sro of the x- and y - spin components is more pronounced due to the af cm interaction along the x- and y - axes . in the lro phase
, the susceptibility @xmath105 strongly decreases with decreasing @xmath88 , because the increasing easy - x - axis lro also enhances the sro . considering the susceptibility @xmath106 , with decreasing @xmath88 below @xmath1 the sro of the y - spin components
is reduced due to the increasing alignment of the spins in x - direction , so that @xmath106 increases with decreasing @xmath88 .
thus , @xmath106 exhibits a minimum at @xmath1 .
the susceptibility @xmath104 in the lro phase turns out to be nearly temperature independent .
in this paper we have calculated thermodynamic properties of the 2d antiferromagnetic ch model within a generalized mean - field approach for arbitrary temperatures . our main focus was the detailed investigation of magnetic lro .
we have found that the nel temperature @xmath1 is finite even in the case of a symmetric cm interaction .
we have explained the temperature dependence of the uniform static susceptibility in terms of magnetic sro .
our investigation forms the basis for forthcoming extended studies of the ch model .
especially , the generalization of the theory holding for arbitrary ch model parameters and allowing for the description of magnetic and directional - ordering transitions is of particular interest .
+ the authors would like to thank w. janke and j. richter for valuable discussions .
the financial support by the heisenberg - landau program of jinr is acknowledged .
crrrc + & @xmath107 & @xmath108 & average & sri + in the limit @xmath114 , the lro in the ground state of the heisenberg af may be described within the rgm by the sri forms of eqs .
( [ eq10 ] ) and ( [ eq12 ] ) , i.e. , by @xmath115 and @xmath116 as it was done , e.g. , in refs .
according to the consideration of the ch model with the easy - axis magnetization @xmath117 , let us outline an alternative possibility to describe the ground - state lro in the af heisenberg model . here , we may also break the rotational symmetry by putting @xmath66 , which is analogous to the introduction of a symmetry - breaking sublattice magnetization ( see , e.g. , our rpa approach @xcite ) .
performing the calculations at @xmath94 as described in sec .
ii , we obtain the correlation functions @xmath118 and the uniform static spin susceptibility @xmath102 listed in table [ table1 ] .
the spin - excitation spectrum at @xmath94 is found to be @xmath119 where @xmath120 and @xmath121 .
the amplitudes @xmath122 are given in table [ table1 ] .
note that eq .
( [ a1 ] ) leads to the sri result ( ref .
@xcite ) , if we put @xmath123 and @xmath124 , and has the same shape as in lswt and rpa . to relate the non - sri description of lro to the sri formulation ,
we calculate arithmetic averages , e.g. , @xmath125 .
as can be seen from table [ table1 ] , we obtain a very good agreement of the averaged ground - state properties with those resulting from the sri theory . moreover , the geometrical average @xmath126 used in our ansatz for the lro phase ( see sec .
ii ) given in the heisenberg limit by @xmath127 nearly agrees with the ratio @xmath128 obtained in the sri approach ( see also ref .
this gives some justification for formulating our ansatz in terms of the geometrical average . | study quantum compass model for transition - metal compounds orbital freedom strong spin - orbit coupling active quantum thermodynamic phase transitions in two - dimensional 2d cm studied in @xcite directional - ordering transition 2d universality class found for symmetric cm temperature phase transition quantum cm found in range @xmath5 @xcite compass - heisenberg model introduced extending cm 2d antiferromagnetic heisenberg model ground state excited states ch model analyzed for 5d transition - metal compounds strong spin - orbit coupling sr@xmath3iro@xmath4 nel temperatures @xmath6k @xmath7k effective af heisenberg model for pseudospins @xmath8 with cm anisotropy derived calculated spin - wave excitation spectrum @xmath1 for layered ch model random phase approximation rpa important issue description of magnetic long - range short - order thermodynamics at arbitrary temperatures theory beyond rpa generalized mean - field approximation to 2d ch model based on equation - of - motion method for green functions theory dynamic spin susceptibility neglect of self - energy corresponds to gmfaapproximation for spin - rotation invariant systems green - function method applied to quantum spin systems start from spin-@xmath0 ch model square lattice @xmath9 @xmath10 nearest - neighbor exchange interaction parameters @xmath11 assume @xmath17 @xmath18 symmetric formulation model allows expressions for quantities with indexes @xmath19 @xmath20 from index @xmath21 cyclic permutation evaluate thermodynamic quantities calculate dynamic spin susceptibility @xmath22 @xmath23 retarded two - time commutator green function @xcite equations motion obtain @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 model moment @xmath28 given by exact expression @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 denote spin correlation functions second derivatives @xmath32 approximated scheme refs @xmath33 decouple products of three spin operators on lattice sites along nn sequences @xmath34 @xmath35 vertex renormalization parameters @xmath36 @xmath37 attached to nn further - distant correlation functionsalgebra obtain @xmath38 @xmath39 squared spin - excitation energy @xmath40{eq6 @xmath41 af lro @xmath43 reflected divergence @xmath44 closure spectrum gap af ordering vector @xmath45 @xmath46 lro phase correlation functions @xmath47 written @xcite @xmath48 @xmath49 green function eq5 spectral theorem @xmath50{eq11 @xmath51 condensation part @xmath52 @xmath53 determines staggered magnetization @xmath54 defined @xmath55 paramagnetic phase @xmath56 @xmath57 nn correlation functions related internal energy @xmath58 per site @xmath59 specific heat @xmath60 obtained calculate thermodynamic properties correlation functions @xmath61 vertex parameters @xmath62 @xmath63 condensation term @xmath52 lro phase determined sum rules @xmath64 lro conditions @xmath53 more parameters than equations obtain closed system self - consistency equations proceedrecent study model rpa linear spin - wave theory @xcite consider anisotropic cm interaction @xmath65 lro phase easy - axis magnetization x axis put @xmath66 consider limiting case @xmath67 t = 0 determining seven quantities @xmath62 @xmath68 three sum rules lro conditions need additional condition adjust ground - state magnetization @xmath69 expression lswt @xmath70 correlation function eq . ( 17 ) @xcite sublattice magnetization @xmath71 substituted spin @xmath8 lro phase @xmath72 ansatz @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 reasonable approximation demonstrated appendix heisenberg limit @xmath76 calculating @xmath62 use sum rules condition @xmath77 input ground - state magnetization lswt describes lro small cm interaction @xmath78 exchange interaction @xmath79 present results region @xmath80 thermodynamic quantities calculated solution nonlinear algebraic self - consistency equations consider results magnetic lro heisenberg limit no lro finite temperature mermin - wagner theorem fig .fig1 nel temperature @xmath1 function @xmath81 two ratios @xmath82 plotted results @xmath1 deviate rpa @xcite @xmath83 @xmath1 dependence on @xmath81 reduced compared rpa symmetric cm interaction @xmath84 theory yields finite nel temperature increases with @xmath85 rpa @xmath86 found differences strong spin fluctuations green - function theory rpa @xcite fluctuations @xmath87 component spin not cm interaction heisenberg model favors magnetic lro at finite @xmath88 findings experiment compound ba@xmath3iro@xmath4 quantum chemistry calculations @xcite yield parameters @xmath89mev @xmath90mev @xmath91 small interplane coupling @xmath92 not account fig magnetization @xmath93 function @xmath88 plotted @xmath94 @xmath95 enhanced by @xmath85 heisenberg limit @xmath96 second - order phase transition at @xmath97k agrees with experimental value @xmath98k @xmath1 specific heat reveals cusplike singularity structure transition temperature found in layered magnets treated rgm @xcite height cusp may be underestimatedcompare result @xmath99 to experimental data not available discuss uniform static spin susceptibility @xmath100 fig symmetric cm interaction reflects behavior magnetic sro increase @xmath2 with temperature caused decrease af sro spin stiffness magnetic field sro less pronounced at @xmath88 maximum exchange energy crossover high - temperature curie - weiss behavior paramagnetic phase @xmath101 susceptibilities @xmath102 lowered due @xmath85 enhancement af sro susceptibility @xmath103 reduced @xmath104 sro x- y - spin components more pronounced af cm interaction lro phase susceptibility @xmath105 decreases @xmath88 increasing x - axis lro enhances sro @xmath106 decreasing @xmath88 below @xmath1 sro y - spin components reduced increasing alignment spins x - direction @xmath106 increases with decreasing @xmath88 minimum at @xmath1 susceptibility @xmath104 in lro phase nearly temperature independent calculated thermodynamic properties 2d antiferromagnetic ch model field approach for arbitrary temperatures main focus investigation magnetic lrofound nel temperature @xmath1 finite even symmetric cm interaction explained temperature dependence uniform static susceptibility magnetic sro investigation basis for studies ch model generalization theory for arbitrary ch model parameters description magnetic directional - ordering transitions interest authors thank w. janke j. richter for discussions financial support heisenberg - landau program jinr acknowledged + @xmath107 @xmath108 average sri + limit @xmath114 lro ground state heisenberg af described by sri forms of eqs eq10 eq12 ] ) @xmath115 @xmath116 consideration ch model easy - axis magnetization @xmath117 outline alternative possibility describe ground - state lro af heisenberg model break rotational symmetry @xmath66 symmetry - breaking sublattice magnetization calculations at @xmath94 obtain correlation functions @xmath118 uniform static spin susceptibility @xmath102 table spin - excitation spectrum at @xmath94 @xmath119 @xmath120 @xmath121 amplitudes @xmath122 given in table eq . ( [ a1 ] ) leads to sri result@xcite ) put @xmath123 @xmath124 same shape lswt rpa relate non - sri description lro to sri formulation calculate arithmetic averages @xmath125 table table1 obtain good agreement averaged ground - state properties with sri theory geometrical average @xmath126 ansatz lro phase heisenberg limit by @xmath127 agrees with ratio @xmath128 sri approach justification formulating ansatz geometrical average | 0.503995 | 3,132 | 1,649 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,080 | this paper serves as the announcement of my program a joke version of the langlands program . in connection with this program ,
i discuss an old hat puzzle , introduce a new hat puzzle , and offer a puzzle for the reader . | this is one of my favorite jokes : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ three logicians walk into a bar .
the waitress asks , `` do you all want beer ? ''
+ the first logician answers , `` i do not know . ''
+ the second logician answers , `` i do not know . ''
+ the third logician answers , `` yes . ''
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this joke reminds me of hat puzzles . in the joke
each logician knows whether or not s / he wants a beer , but does nt know what the others want to drink . in hat puzzles
logicians know the colors of the hats on others heads , but not the color of their own hats . here is a hat puzzle where the logicians provide the same answers as in the beer joke .
three logicians wearing hats walk into a bar . they know that the hats were placed on their heads from the set of hats in figure [ fig : hatset ] .
the total number of available red hats was three , and the total number of available blue hats was two . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^ " , ] [ fig : distinctcolors ] it is natural to try to reuse the solution we know for the previous puzzle .
let us say that the number of hats is @xmath0 and the number of logicians is @xmath1 .
suppose the last person sums the colors modulo @xmath0 and announces his / her own color so that the total sum is zero .
the problem is that s / he might announce the color of one of the logicians in front of him / her .
suppose the last logician says `` red . '' when it s time for the logician who is actually wearing a red hat to speak , s / he will realize that his / her hat is red , and oops , s / he ca nt repeat this color . if s / he says a different color randomly , s / he will throw off the strategy and mislead everyone in front .
is there a way to rescue this strategy so that only a small number of logicians might be mistaken ?
it appears that there is .
suppose the last logician says `` red , '' and the logician in the red hat says `` blue . ''
the blue color was nt announced yet so the logician in the blue hat is most probably way in front of the red - hatted logician .
that means that all the logicians between the red - hatted and the blue - hatted logicians will know that something wrong happened .
they will not be misled .
they will realize that the logician who said `` blue '' said so because s / he were not allowed to say his / her own color . so that color must be red .
that means all the logicians in between can still figure out their colors .
here is the strategy where not more than three people will name a wrong color : the last person announces the color so that his / her color and the sum of the colors s / he sees modulo @xmath0 is zero .
if there is a logician with this hat color , s / he says the hat color of the first person .
this way the three people who might be mistaken are the last one , the logician with the hat color announced by the last person and the first person in line .
everyone else is guaranteed to be correct .
this is quite a good solution , but there is a completely different solution that guarantees that not more than * one * person is mistaken .
i invite you to try and solve it yourself .
if you ca nt do it , you can find the solution in my paper devoted to this puzzle @xcite .
convert the above puzzles into jokes ! | one of my favorite jokes : _ _ _ _ three logicians walk into a bar . waitress asks `` do you all want beer ? '' first logician answers not know '' second not know third logician answers `` yes . '' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ joke reminds me of hat puzzles . in joke each logician knows wants a beer , but does nt know what others want to drink . in hat puzzles logicians know colors of hats on others heads not color of their own hats . here is a hat puzzle where logicians provide same answers as in beer joke . three logicians wearing hats walk into bar . they know hats were placed on their heads from set of hats in figure [ fig : hatset ] total number of available red hats was three blue hats two . [ cols="^,^,^^ " fig : distinctcolors ] natural to reuse solution for previous puzzle . number of hats is @xmath0 and number of logicians is @xmath1 . suppose last person sums colors modulo @xmath0 and announces his / own color so total sum is zero .problem s / he might announce color of front last logician says `` red for logician wearing red hat to speak his hat is red ca nt repeat color if says different color randomly strategy mislead everyone front way to rescue strategy small number of logicians mistaken ? last logician says `` red logician in red hat says `` blue . blue color nt announced logician in blue hat probably in front of red - hatted logician all logicians between red blue know something wrong happened not be misled realize logician said `` blue '' said not allowed to say his own color color must be red logicians between can figure out colors strategy not more than three people name wrong color : last person announces color his / her color and sum of colors sees is zero if logician with hat color says hat color of first person three people mistaken are last logician with hat color announced last person first person in line everyone else guaranteed correct good solution different solution guarantees not more than one person mistaken invite to solve it yourself if find solution in my paper devoted puzzle @xcite convert puzzles into jokes | 0.140215 | 930 | 440 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,097 | we examine the effect of the thermal vacuum on the power spectrum of inflation by using the thermal field dynamics .
we find that the thermal effect influences the cmb anisotropy at large length scale . after removing the divergence by using the holographic cutoff , we observe that the thermal vacuum explains well the observational cmb result at low multipoles .
this shows that the temperature dependent factor should be considered in the study of power spectrum in inflation , especially at large length scale .
the scenario of the inflation provides an excellent solution to the horizon and flatness problems @xcite . during inflation the quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field
can freeze out and become the seed for large scale structure @xcite .
these fluctuations can translate into perturbations in energy density and curvature in the universe and can be imprinted in the anisotropy of cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) , which can be measured with higher and higher precision nowadays .
recently an intriguing possibility has been discovered in the literature that inflation might provide a window towards physics beyond the planck scale .
chances to detect such trans - planckian effect in the cmb observation have been addressed in refs .. in the standard inflationary scenario , initial conditions for the inflaton field are imposed in the infinite past with an infinitely short wavelength when the effect of the inflationary horizon and the expansion of the universe can be ignored . the spacetime is essentially minkowskian and there is a unique vacuum , the bunch - davis vacuum , for the inflaton field . to encode the new physics near the planck scale ,
a simple modification in the standard scenario has been focused on different choices of the vacuum @xcite .
it has been shown that based on some choices of vacua discussions of many trans - planckian effects can be carried out and qualitative correction due to planck scale can be obtained without detailed knowledge of trans - planckian physics . however , all these vacua chosen to discuss the inflation are of zero temperature .
inflation started just shortly after the big bang when the universe was extremely hot at that moment . before the inflation it would be reasonable to consider that the universe was in thermal equilibrium .
after the inflation , the thermal equilibrium can be restored . in the process of the inflation ,
the inflaton coupled extremely weak to thermal fields so that the inflaton itself is out of the thermal equilibrium during inflation . however , considering that the inflation process is extremely short , one can suppose that this process can be described with the comoving temperature @xmath0 to relate the initial and final states @xcite , where @xmath1 is the scale factor , and use the thermal ground state for the inflaton .
in our work we will use this assumption and employ the thermo field dynamics to discuss the problem in detail . in thermo field dynamics
@xcite , suppose the temperature of the form @xmath2 , the bogoliubov transformations of the usual boson operators @xmath3 can be reversed into @xmath4 where @xmath5 , @xmath6 and spectrum @xmath7 .
obviously @xmath8 and @xmath9 , then in the following we will simply use @xmath10 .
in above definition we introduced the tilde operators @xmath11 and @xmath12 in the duplicated space in additional to the normal operators .
correspondingly , the state space should also be doubled , which means that we will not only have @xmath13 , but also @xmath14 ( @xmath15 ) .
the tilde operators operate on tilde space vector @xmath14 while the normal operators operate on the normal state @xmath13 .
thermal operators satisfy the commuting relations , @xmath16=1 $ ] , @xmath17=1 $ ] , @xmath18=0 $ ] , which can be verified directly from the commutators of the operators @xmath19 and @xmath11 .
now we express the thermal vacuum as @xmath20 . from the thermo field dynamics
, we learn that thermal vacuum state of a boson field is the infinite linear composition of the state @xmath21 : @xmath22 which satisfies @xmath23 with these formalism , we are in a position to examine the influence of the thermal vacuum on the power spectrum of the inflation . in zero temperature case ,
given a statefunction @xmath24 solved from field equation in momentum space , we can build up the field operator as @xmath25 in the scalar perturbation , the power spectrum is defined as @xcite @xmath26 where the last factor arises from the expectation value of the field operator in the vacuum state , @xmath27 in the thermal vacuum , the field operator @xmath28 can be expressed as @xmath29+\chi^*_k(\eta)[\cosh\theta_k\hat{a}^\dagger_{-k}(\beta ) + \sinh\theta_k\hat{\tilde{a}}_{-k}(\beta)]\},\nonumber\\ & = & \sum_k\{\cosh\theta_k[\chi_k(\eta)\hat{a}_k(\beta)+\chi^*_k(\eta ) \hat{a}^\dagger_{-k}(\beta)]+\sinh\theta_k[\chi^*_k(\eta)\hat{\tilde{a}}_{-k}(\beta ) + \chi_k(\eta)\hat{\tilde{a}}^\dagger_k(\beta)]\}\end{aligned}\ ] ] by substituting eq.(2 ) into eq.(5 ) .
we see now the field space is composed of two parts , the normal space and the duplicate space , with weights @xmath30 and @xmath31 , respectively . the particle number can be calculated as @xmath32 which is just the distribution of thermal equilibrium states .
the power spectrum of perturbation in the thermal vacuum becomes @xmath33[\chi_k(\eta)\hat{a}_k(\beta)+\chi^*_k(\eta ) \hat{a}^\dagger_{-k}(\beta)]|\beta0\rangle\}\right.\nonumber\\ & & \left.+\{\langle\beta0|\sinh\theta_k^2[\chi_k(\eta)\hat{\tilde{a}}^\dagger_{-k}(\beta ) + \chi_k(\eta)\hat{\tilde{a}}_k(\beta)][\chi_k^*(\eta)\hat{\tilde{a}}_{-k}(\beta ) + \chi_k(\eta)\hat{\tilde{a}}^\dagger_k(\beta)]|\beta0\rangle\}\right)\nonumber\\ & = & \left(\frac{h}{\dot{\chi}}\right)^2\frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}|\chi_k\cosh\theta_k|^2 + \left(\frac{h}{\dot{\chi}}\right)^2\frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}|\chi_k\sinh\theta_k|^2\nonumber\\ & = & p_k(\cosh^2\theta_k+\sinh^2\theta_k)=p_k\coth\frac{\beta\omega}{2},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath34 is the power spectrum obtained by considering the zero temperature vacuum .
for the massless scalar field , @xmath35 .
the temperature effect appears in the factor @xmath36 , which shows that the power spectrum gets modified due to the thermal effect .
when @xmath37 , eq.(10 ) reduces to the usual result of eq.(6 ) . in the above derivation , we use the finite temperature field theory which clearly shows the temperature effect in the vacuum .
this approach is general and does not depend on the choice of the vacuum . adding the thermal effect in the adiabatic vacuum
, we can generalize the power spectrum in @xcite by including the thermal factor as @xmath38\coth\frac{k}{2\tilde{t}},\ ] ] where @xmath39 is the comoving temperature and @xmath40 is the trans - planckian energy level .
the second term in the bracket represents the effect brought by the trans - planckian physics . at zero temperature
the modulation of the power spectrum of primordial density fluctuation predicted in the trans - planckian model has been studied by considering the change of the hubble parameter and slow - roll condition @xcite @xmath41 where @xmath42 is the reduced planck mass . in ref.@xcite , adopting the scale parameter @xmath43 and @xmath44 , the trans - planckian power spectrum is expressed into @xmath45\right\},\ ] ] where @xmath46 and the pivot scale @xmath47 mpc@xmath48 , based on the value @xmath49 km s@xmath50 mpc@xmath50 from five - year wmap result @xcite . the power spectra @xmath51 for different values of @xmath52 and @xmath53 were shown in ref.@xcite . in fig.1
we illustrate their result of zero temperature case in the solid line by taking @xmath54 . and @xmath55.,width=604 ] and its comparison with wmap data .
the dashed line is for zero temperature case , while the solid line shows the thermal effect .
the best fitting of solid line is made with @xmath56 and @xmath57 , while for the dashed line @xmath58.,width=604 ] considering the thermal effect with additional term @xmath59 , we have the power spectrum @xmath60\right\}\coth\frac{k}{2\tilde{t}}.\ ] ] the temperature influence on the power spectrum @xmath34 is shown by the dashed line in fig.1 .
we took @xmath61 in our plot and noticed that different values of @xmath62 will not change the qualitative behavior of the dashed line .
the thermal influence becomes significant especially at small @xmath63 , while its influence can be neglected for big enough @xmath63 .
in other words the change in the spectrum due to the thermal effect is large at large angles and small at small angles .
this brings an interesting possibility that the thermal effect might influence the cmb at small @xmath64 .
when @xmath65 , because of the factor @xmath59 , we will meet the divergence problem in the power spectrum , which is unphysical . to tackle this problem we resort to the idea of the holographic cutoff employed in @xcite .
relating the ultraviolet and infrared cutoff @xcite , the quantum zero - point energy density @xmath66 which can be related to the cosmological constant or dark energy density in a flat universe can be expressed by @xmath67 where @xmath68 is the infrared cutoff , and @xmath69 is a constant parameter . from this relation ,
we can write @xmath70 , where @xmath71 is the present value of the dark energy ratio to the critical density @xmath72 .
consequently this introduces the cutoff at the wave number @xcite @xmath73 this holographic cutoff can help to remove the divergency brought by @xmath74 .
now we move on to examine the thermal effect on the cmb at small @xmath64 by comparing with the wmap data .
the cmb angular spectrum is expressed as @xcite @xmath75 where @xmath76 is the spherical bessel function and @xmath77 is the comoving distance to the last scattering surface , @xmath78 and @xmath79 is the redshift of decoupling usually taken as @xmath80 .
we choose the hubble parameter @xmath81 where @xmath82 is the equation of state of dark energy and is assumed as a constant for simplicity . in our numerical calculation , we will set @xmath83 and @xmath84 @xcite .
for the zero temperature case , it has been shown that the relation between ultraviolet and infrared cutoff can help to explain the small @xmath64 cmb suppression @xcite , which is exhibited in the dashed curve in fig.2 .
however , compared with the wmap data , it can not explain well the wriggle observed at @xmath85 .
notice that the thermal effect may play the role at large angle to modify the power spectrum , we now turn to the temperature dependent spectrum in eq.(14 ) .
to do the data fitting with wmap result at small @xmath64 , we have parameters @xmath62 , @xmath69 , @xmath53 and @xmath86 or @xmath52 now .
we observed that in the reasonable range of slow - roll condition , values of @xmath53 and @xmath52 do not significantly change the total power spectrum , thus we fix them to be @xmath87 and @xmath88 to ensure observable trans - planckian effect to be found in cmb @xcite .
now we have two parameters @xmath69 and @xmath62 to be determined . calculating the angular power spectrum @xmath89 and comparing with wmap data by doing @xmath90 fitting for @xmath91 ,
@xmath92 ^ 2 } { ( \sigma^i)^2}\ ] ] where @xmath93 is the observational error of each data , we present the best fitting result in solid line in fig.2 , where
@xmath94 and @xmath95 ev @xmath96 k. this result keeps almost the same when we shift @xmath53 and @xmath52 in the reasonable range of the slow - roll inflation condition .
it can be seen from fig.2 that the thermal effect can well explain the wmap data at small @xmath64 , especially the wriggle at @xmath85 . in summary ,
we have employed the thermo field dynamics to investigate the thermal vacuum effect on the power spectrum of the inflation . comparing with the spectrum of the zero temperature case , we have observed that the thermal effect plays the role essentially in the low multipoles or large length scale .
resorting to the idea of holographic cutoff , we have removed the divergence problem when @xmath74 . comparing with the wmap data at small @xmath64
, we have found that the thermal effect explains well the data at small @xmath64 than the zero temperature case . when @xmath85 , the spectrum got enhanced due to the temperature effect .
this suggests that the thermal effect should be considered in studying the inflation , especially when we want to study the cmb anisotropy at low multipoles .
the temperature was very high at the beginning of the inflation , so it actually influences the fluctuation spectrum which escaped earlier from the horizon and reentered later so that the large scale ( small @xmath64 ) cmb spectrum got corrected .
when the inflation started , the temperature dropped fast , and the temperature effect has less influence on the fluctuation spectrum .
these fluctuations left the horizon later and reentered earlier which affect the small scale cmb spectrum . since the temperature effect is low , most cmb spectrum ( @xmath97 ) has little difference compared with the zero temperature case .
this actually gives the reason why we see the temperature correction is important in the small @xmath64 cmb spectrum , which is consistent with the observation , while for big @xmath64 , the temperature effect is negligible . | this work was partially supported by the nnsf of china , shanghai education commission , shanghai science and technology commission .
we would like to acknowledge helpful discussions with r.g.cai and y.g.gong .
s. yin s work was also partially supported by the graduate renovation foundation of fudan university . | work supported nnsf china shanghai education science technology commission acknowledge discussions r.g.cai y.g.gong yin s work supported graduate renovation foundation fudan university | 0.06543 | 66 | 34 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,100 | we discuss recent results on heavy and light baryon spectroscopy . address = dpto .
de fsica fundamental , universidad de salamanca , spain address = dpto . de fsica terica , universidad de valencia ( uv ) and ific ( uv - csic ) , spain address = dpto . de fsica terica , universidad de valencia , spain address = escuela superior de fsica y matemticas , instituto politcnico nacional , mexico | hadron spectroscopy has undergone a great renaissance in recent years @xcite .
the new findings include : low - lying excitations of d and b mesons , long - awaited missing states and new states near 4 gev / c@xmath0 in the charmonium spectrum , charmed and bottom baryons , and evidence for doubly charmed baryons .
the light hadron sector remains also restless reporting new scalar mesons or showing a deep theoretical interest in the high energy part of both the meson and baryon spectra . in this talk
we center our attention in the heavy baryon spectroscopy as well as some anomalous states present in the light baryon spectra .
heavy baryons containing a single heavy quark are particularly interesting .
the light degrees of freedom ( quarks and gluons ) circle around the nearly static heavy quark .
such a system behaves as the qcd analogue of the familiar hydrogen bounded by the electromagnetic interaction . when the heavy quark mass @xmath1 , the angular momentum of the light degrees of freedom is a good quantum number .
thus , heavy quark baryons belong to either su(3 ) antisymmetric @xmath2 or symmetric @xmath3 representations .
the spin of the light diquark is 0 for @xmath2 , while it is 1 for @xmath3 .
thus , the spin of the ground state baryons is @xmath4 for @xmath2 , representing the @xmath5 and @xmath6 baryons , while it can be both @xmath4 or @xmath7 for @xmath3 , allocating @xmath8 , @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath12 and @xmath13 , where the star indicates spin @xmath7 states
. therefore heavy hadrons form doublets .
for example , @xmath8 and @xmath14 will be degenerate in the heavy quark limit .
their mass splitting is caused by the chromomagnetic interaction at the order @xmath15 .
these effects can be , for example , taken into account systematically in the framework of heavy quark effective field theory . the mass difference between states belonging to the @xmath2 and @xmath3 representations
do also contain the dynamics of the light diquark subsystem , hard to accommodate in any heavy quark mass expansion .
therefore , exact solutions of the three - body problem for heavy hadrons are theoretically desirable because they will serve to test the reliability of approximate techniques : heavy quark mass expansions , variational calculations , or quark - diquark approximations .
.masses , in mev , of charmed and bottom baryons . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] although the value of @xmath16 might vary depending on the configurations involved in each @xmath17 coupling we shall use for the sake of simplicity the same value in all cases .
the @xmath18 results for @xmath19 mev are numerically detailed in table [ t2 ] where the values for @xmath20 and for ( @xmath21 in the chosen @xmath22 channel as well as their probabilities to give @xmath18 are also displayed .
as can be checked the improvement of the description with respect to @xmath23 is astonishing .
all the predicted @xmath18 masses lye very close to the pdg average masses for the anomalies . in fig .
[ fig3 ] the @xmath18 values for @xmath24 mev are drawn as compared to the experimental mass intervals .
( boxes ) .
n.c . means non - cataloged resonance.,width=415 ] we interpret these results as providing strong quantitative support to our former qualitative description of the anomalies .
regarding their nature a look at the probabilities reveal they are mostly meson - baryon states .
actually a meson - baryon probability greater or equal than @xmath25 can serve as a criterion to identify an anomaly .
nonetheless the coupling to the @xmath26 component is essential to lower their masses making them more stable against decay into @xmath27 .
it should be emphasized that similar results could be obtained for any other spectroscopic @xmath28 model through a fine tuning of the value of @xmath29 ( note that the small value of @xmath30 as compared to @xmath20 and @xmath31 provides an _ a posteriori _ validation of our method)@xmath32 this comes from the expression of the eigenvalues where it is clear that even for @xmath33 one gets @xmath34 which according to our @xmath22 choice is much closer to the pdg mass of the anomaly than @xmath20 .
this means that concerning the mass of the anomalies the coupling of meson - baryon to @xmath26 components may play the role of a general _ healing mechanism _ for spectroscopic models .
we have studied the heavy baryon spectra by means of the faddeev method in momentum space .
these results should be highly valuable both from the theoretical and experimental points of view .
theoretically , it should be a powerful tool for testing different approximate methods to solve the three - body problem .
experimentally , the remarkable agreement with known experimental data make our predictions highly valuable as a guideline to experimentalists .
heavy baryons constitute an extremely interesting problem joining the dynamics of light - light and heavy - light subsystems in an amazing manner . while the mass difference between members of the same su(3 ) configuration , either @xmath2 or @xmath3 , is determined by the perturbative one - gluon exchange , the mass difference between members of different representations comes mainly determined by the dynamics of the light diquark , and should therefore be determined in consistency with the light baryon spectra .
there is therefore a remnant effect of pseudoscalar forces in the two - light quark subsystem . for light baryons
we propose that @xmath35 components , in the form of @xmath36 wave meson - baryon channels which we identify , play an essential role in the description of the anomalies , say baryon resonances very significantly overpredicted by three - quark models based on two - body interactions . as a matter of fact by considering a simplified description of the anomalies as systems composed of a free meson - baryon channel interacting with a three - quark confined component we have shown they could correspond mostly to meson - baryon states but with a non - negligible @xmath26 state probability which makes their masses to be below the meson - baryon threshold .
the remarkable agreement of our results with data in all cases suggests the implementation of meson - baryon threshold effects as an essential physical mechanism to give account of spectral states poorly described by constituent quark models . | hadron spectroscopy new findings include low - lying excitations d b mesons missing states new states near 4 gev / c@xmath0 charmonium spectrum charmed bottom baryons doubly charmed baryons light hadron sector new scalar mesons interest high energy meson baryon spectra heavy baryon spectroscopy anomalous states light baryon spectra heavy baryons single heavy quark interesting light degrees freedom circle around heavy quark system hydrogen electromagnetic interaction heavy quark mass @xmath1 angular momentum light degrees freedom good quantum number heavy quark baryons belong antisymmetric @xmath2 or symmetric @xmath3 representations spin light diquark 0 for @xmath2 1 for @xmath3 spin ground state baryons @xmath4 for @xmath2 @xmath5 @xmath6 baryons @xmath4 or @xmath7 for @xmath3 star indicates @xmath7 states heavy hadrons form doublets @xmath8 @xmath14 degenerate in heavy quark limit mass splitting caused by chromomagnetic interaction at @xmath15effects in heavy quark field theory mass difference between @xmath2 and @xmath3 representations dynamics light diquark subsystem hard in heavy quark mass expansion exact solutions of three - body problem for heavy hadrons desirable test reliability of techniques heavy quark mass expansions variational calculations quark - diquark approximations.masses in mev of charmed bottom baryons value of @xmath16 vary @xmath17 coupling same value in all cases @xmath18 results for @xmath19 mev detailed in table [ t2 values for @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 channel probabilities to @xmath18 displayed improvement of description @xmath23 astonishing predicted @xmath18 masses close to pdg average masses for anomalies fig @xmath18 values for @xmath24 mev compared to experimental mass intervals - cataloged resonance results quantitative support to qualitative description of anomalies probabilities mostly meson - baryon states meson - baryon probability greater or equal than @xmath25 can identify anomalycoupling to @xmath26 essential to lower masses stable against decay into @xmath27 similar results for other spectroscopic @xmath28 model through fine tuning value @xmath29 small value of @xmath30 compared to provides validation of method@xmath32 from expression eigenvalues for @xmath33 gets @xmath34 closer to pdg mass anomaly than @xmath20 coupling meson - baryon to @xmath26 may healing mechanism for spectroscopic models studied heavy baryon spectra faddeev method in momentum space results valuable theoretical and experimental powerful tool for testing methods three - body problem agreement with experimental data predictions valuable guideline heavy baryons interesting problem joining dynamics of light - light heavy - light subsystems mass difference between same su(3 ) configuration @xmath2 or @xmath3 determined by perturbative one - gluon exchange between different representations determined by dynamics light diquark consistency with light baryon spectra remnant effect of pseudoscalar forces in two - light quark subsystemlight baryons propose @xmath35 components @xmath36 wave meson - baryon channels essential anomalies baryon resonances overpredicted three - quark models considering simplified description anomalies systems free meson - baryon channel interacting three - quark confined component correspond meson - baryon states @xmath26 state probability masses below meson - baryon threshold agreement results data suggests implementation meson - baryon threshold effects essential mechanism spectral states poorly described quark models | 0.261511 | 1,465 | 760 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,123 | a heavy quark placed in the medium modifies its specific heat . using a renormalization group argument
we show a low energy theorem in terms of the defect in the trace of the energy - momentum tensor which allows the unambiguous determination of the corresponding entropy shift after imposing the third principle of thermodynamics for degenerate states .
we show how recent lattice qcd data can be understood in the confined phase in terms of a single - heavy hadronic spectrum and above the phase transition through power corrections which are analyzed by means of a dimension 2 gluon condensate of the dimensionally reduced theory . | and non - perturbatively by the bielefeld group @xcite . in a series of works
@xcite we have pointed out that , instead of pqcd features , unexpected inverse power corrections in temperature dominate above the phase transition , a non - perturbative feature which finds a natural explanation in terms of dimension-2 condensates of the dimensionally reduced theory . on the other extreme
we have also found a hadronic representation in the confined phase both for the polyakov loop @xcite and its correlators @xcite ( see also @xcite ) . for a pedagogical review
see e.g. @xcite .
perturbative calculations of the renormalized polyakov loop have been pursued to nnlo @xcite .
the mysterious power corrections have been confirmed on the lattice for @xmath0 @xcite .
quite recently , the tum lattice calculation for physical quark masses in 2 + 1 flavours has been carried out in the temperature range @xmath1 @xcite concluding that at earliest pqcd to nnlo @xcite might set in at @xmath2 . here
we display the power correction pattern over a huge range of temperatures and argue on the missing singly heavy hadronic states below the phase transition .
the polyakov loop is a local operator which in the static gauge reads @xmath3 ( @xmath4 ) .
its expectation value is a ratio of two partition functions ( we take conventionally @xmath5 ) @xmath6 where the qcd lagrangian for @xmath7 flavours @xmath8 reads , in terms of the re - scaled gluon field @xmath9 with @xmath10 , @xmath11 the renormalized polyakov loop is uniquely defined up to a constant factor which corresponds to @xmath12 .
there is no natural way to fix the ambiguity , but it can be removed by using the corresponding entropy @xmath13 \ , .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] being dimensionless , one should have @xmath14 , with @xmath15 the renormalization scale .
renormalization group invariance requires @xmath16 where the beta function and the mass anomalous dimension are , @xmath17 respectively .
direct evaluation yields the shift in the specific heat @xmath18 \right\ } \equiv \frac{\partial \delta u_q}{\partial t } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath19 is the trace of the energy momentum tensor , the argument of ref .
the entropy shift is not a true entropy .
for instance , the true entropy must be a monotonous function of the temperature since from @xmath20 it follows @xmath21 .
thus _ both _ @xmath22 and @xmath23 but the sign of @xmath24 is not fixed .
the exact relations for thermodynamics of heavy quarks @xcite are still subjected to ambiguities which are removed in the specific heat . ]
@xmath25 the entropy shift can be obtained by integrating with suitable boundary conditions featuring the dimensions of the hilbert space with and without polyakov loop . at low temperatures @xmath26 for @xmath27 degenerate flavours and @xmath28 , whereas at high temperatures @xmath29 , thus @xmath30 the first condition is the third principle of thermodynamics for degenerate states .
the recent tum lattice calculations directly provide the entropy in the range @xmath1 @xcite taking the convention @xmath31 in harmony with their normalization @xmath32 which , unlike ours , _ is not _ a partition function at low temperatures .
the critical temperature was found to be @xmath33 .
in the confined phase we expect a hadronic representation of the polyakov loop @xcite .
there the ambiguity comes from the heavy quark mass which is subtracted from the hadron total mass . in @xcite
we explicitly reconstructed the entropy @xmath34 although the available lattice data were noisier than the recent ones @xcite . in fig .
[ fig : entropy - models ] we show the lattice entropy results @xcite and compare them with the hadron resonance gas using either the bag model ( centered at the heavy quark source ) , the pdg or the rqm of isgur , godfrey and capstick for mesons and baryons @xcite taking either the charm or the bottom as the putative heavy quark .
we have noted in previous works that these rqm singly heavy states follow a hagedorn - like pattern with a hagedorn - polyakov temperature of about @xmath35 for @xmath36-quarks .
results from a simple constituent quark model ( cqm ) are also shown @xmath37 with @xmath38 and @xmath39 and spin degeneracies @xmath40 , @xmath41 .
at high temperatures the polyakov loop can be expanded in powers of @xmath42 @xcite @xmath43 .\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath44 has both perturbative ( pert ) and non - perturbative ( np ) contributions , whence the entropy reads @xmath45 where @xmath46 is a slowly varying function with temperature . in fig .
[ fig : entropy - inv ] we display the recent tum data @xcite as a function of @xmath47 .
a clear straight line behaviour emerges over a huge range of temperatures .
a fit for @xmath48 , neglecting the @xmath49 dependence in @xmath46 , gives @xmath50 with @xmath51 for @xmath52 .
this gives @xmath53 which is within the expected @xmath54 .
when a heavy colour source in the fundamental representation of the @xmath55 group is placed into the hadronic vacuum there arises an entropy shift as a measurable and unambiguous observable .
we noted long ago that lattice data for the corresponding free energy display corrections to the perturbative result in the unequivocal form of an inverse second power of the temperature .
this behaviour has been corroborated by subsequent lattice studies .
the present analysis improves on previous ones thanks to the quality of the tum lattice data , and the fact that the unambiguous entropy is used for the comparison . at low temperatures the quick increase in the number of active states , @xmath56 ,
suggests that there are missing states in the singly heavy hadronic spectrum . at high temperatures power corrections
dominate over the perturbative contributions , in harmony with our previous findings .
taken at face value , the impressive agreement calls for a deeper understanding on the nature of these power corrections above the phase transition .
o. kaczmarek et al .
b543 ( 2002 ) 41 .
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola and l.l .
salcedo , jhep 01 ( 2006 ) 073 .
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola and l.l .
salcedo , phys .
d75 ( 2007 ) 105019 .
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola and l.l .
salcedo , phys .
d80 ( 2009 ) 056005 .
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola and l.l .
salcedo , phys .
d81 ( 2010 ) 096009 .
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola and l.l .
salcedo , phys .
( 2012 ) 151601 .
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola and l.l .
salcedo , phys .
d89 ( 2014 ) 076006 .
e. megias , e. ruiz arriola and l.l .
salcedo , ( 2016 ) , 1603.04642 .
n. brambilla et al .
d82 ( 2010 ) 074019 .
m. berwein et al .
d93 ( 2016 ) 034010 .
a. mykkanen , m. panero and k. rummukainen , jhep 05 ( 2012 ) 069 .
a. bazavov et al . , (
2016 ) , 1603.06637 . | non - perturbatively bielefeld group @xcite pointed pqcd inverse power corrections temperature dominate above phase transition non - perturbative feature explanation dimension-2 condensates dimensionally reduced theory found hadronic representation in confined phase polyakov loop @xcite correlators pedagogical review see @xcite perturbative calculations renormalized polyakov loop pursued to nnlo @xcite power corrections confirmed lattice @xmath0 @xcite tum lattice calculation physical quark masses 2 + 1 flavours temperature range @xmath1 @xcite pqcd to nnlo @xcite set @xmath2 display power correction pattern over temperatures argue missing heavy hadronic states below phase transition polyakov loop local operator static gauge reads @xmath3 @xmath4 expectation value ratio of two partition functions @xmath5 ) @xmath6 qcd lagrangian @xmath7 @xmath8 reads re - scaled gluon field renormalized polyakov loop defined constant factor @xmath12 no way fix ambiguity using corresponding entropy @xmath13 dimensionless @xmath14 @xmath15 renormalization scalerenormalization requires @xmath16 beta function mass anomalous dimension @xmath17 evaluation yields shift specific heat @xmath18\delta{aligned @xmath19 trace energy momentum tensor entropy shift not true entropy true entropy monotonous function temperature @xmath20 follows @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 sign @xmath24 not fixed exact relations thermodynamics heavy quarks @xcite ambiguities removed specific heat @xmath25 entropy shift integrating boundary conditions dimensions hilbert space without polyakov loop low temperatures @xmath26 @xmath27 degenerate flavours @xmath28 high temperatures @xmath29 @xmath30 first condition third principle thermodynamics degenerate states recent tum lattice calculations provide entropy range @xmath1 @xcite convention @xmath31 normalization @xmath32 not partition function low temperatures critical temperature @xmath33 confined phase hadronic representation polyakov loop @xcite ambiguity from heavy quark mass subtracted from hadron total mass @xcite reconstructed entropy @xmath34 lattice data noisier fig .fig : entropy - models lattice entropy results @xcite compare hadron resonance gas using bag model heavy quark source pdg rqm of isgur godfrey capstick for mesons baryons charm or bottom putative heavy quark rqm heavy states follow hagedorn - like pattern - polyakov temperature @xmath35 @xmath36-quarks results simple constituent quark model shown @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 spin degeneracies @xmath40 @xmath41 high temperatures polyakov loop expanded powers @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 has perturbative non - perturbative contributions entropy reads @xmath45 @xmath46 varying function with temperature entropy - inv recent tum data @xcite function of @xmath47 straight line behaviour over temperatures fit for @xmath48 gives @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 within expected @xmath54 heavy colour source @xmath55 group into hadronic vacuum entropy shift lattice data free energy display corrections perturbative result inverse second power of temperature corroborated by lattice studiespresent analysis improves thanks quality tum lattice data unambiguous entropy comparison low temperatures increase active states suggests missing states heavy hadronic spectrum high temperatures power corrections dominate perturbative contributions harmony with previous findings agreement calls deeper understanding power corrections phase transition kaczmarek et al . b543 ( 2002 ) 41 . megias ruiz arriola l.l . salcedo jhep 01 ( 2006 ) 073 d75 ( 2007 ) 105019 d80 ( 2009 ) 056005 d81 ( 2010 ) 096009 megias arriola salcedo 2012 ) 151601 d89 ( 2014 ) 076006 megias ruiz arriola l.l salcedo 2016 ) 1603.04642 brambilla et al . d82 ( 2010 ) 074019 berwein et al . d93 ( 2016 ) 034010 mykkanen panero. rummukainen jhep 05 ( 2012 ) 069 bazavov et al . 2016 ) 1603.06637 | 0.26497 | 1,785 | 921 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,129 | we present preliminary results on the resummation of leading and next - to - leading logarithms for the thrust distribution in deep inelastic scattering .
our predictions , expanded to @xmath0 , are compared to corresponding results from the monte carlo programs disaster++ and disent .
bicocca
ft9931 + hep - ph/9910343 + october 1999 | for some time now it has been standard practice in @xmath1 reactions to compare event - shape distributions with resummed perturbative predictions ( see for instance @xcite ) .
the resummation is necessary because in the two - jet limit ( small values of the shape variable ) the presence of large soft and collinear logarithms spoils the convergence of the fixed - order calculations .
such resummed analyses have led to valuable information about the strong coupling constant and also about non - perturbative effects . at hera ,
studies of event - shape distributions are being carried out by both collaborations @xcite but as yet no perturbative resummed calculations exist for comparison . here
we present preliminary results on such a calculation @xcite . in dis ,
event shapes are defined in the current hemisphere of the breit frame @xcite to reduce contamination from remnant fragmentation which is beyond perturbative control .
the distribution of emissions in the current hemisphere ( @xmath2 ) is analogous to that in a single hemisphere of @xmath1 .
differences arise from @xmath3 however because the momentum of the current quark ( the quark struck by the photon ) depends on remnant - hemisphere ( @xmath4 ) emissions through recoil effects .
this necessitates a resummed treatment of the space - like branching of the incoming parton .
currently such a simultaneous resummation of the space - like and time - like ( double logarithmic ) contributions exists only for jet multiplicities @xcite , or for cross sections at large @xmath5 @xcite . for the thrust @xmath6 ( as defined in the following section ) the recoil from remnant hemisphere emissions can be divided into two parts : a piece from soft and collinear emissions , which gives double logarithms @xmath7 , identical to those from half a hemisphere of @xmath3 , and a piece from purely collinear emissions which gives single logarithms @xmath8 that can be identified with a change of scale in the parton distribution .
this is outlined in the next section .
a valuable cross - check of any resummation is to expand it to nlo and compare the result to that from fixed order monte carlo programs such as disaster++ @xcite and disent @xcite .
this is illustrated in section [ sec : fixed ] . finally in section [ sec : future ] , we comment on possible future developments .
there are several possible definitions of the thrust in dis , which differ according to a choice of axis and the normalisation .
we here consider the thrust with respect to the photon axis , @xmath9 , and normalised to @xmath10 , @xmath11 where the sum extends over all particles in the current hemisphere , @xmath12 . at lowest order @xmath13 , so the region requiring resummation will be that of @xmath14 close to zero . expressing all momenta in terms of their sudakov components @xmath15 where @xmath16 and @xmath17 are along the remnant and current directions respectively ,
we can write the thrust as @xcite @xmath18 where the sums now run over emitted particles only and @xmath19 is the @xmath20 component of the current quark . ] .
dependence on the remnant hemisphere emissions arises both through the @xmath21 term and through @xmath22 ( we have made use of the fact that @xmath23 ) .
we now consider the cross section @xmath24 for @xmath14 to be smaller than @xmath25 .
roughly it will contain virtual corrections from the exclusion of all emissions whose contribution to is larger than @xmath25 . in the remnant hemisphere
we exclude soft and collinear emissions , @xmath26 , where the @xmath27 condition ensures that particle be in @xmath4 .
the integration over @xmath28 and @xmath29 gives a double logarithm .
in @xmath2 we exclude the soft and collinear region @xmath30 .
again this gives us a double logarithm .
the exclusion @xmath31 is just a limit on the maximum emitted transverse momentum : this implies ` stopping ' the dglap @xcite parton evolution at a scale @xmath32 , which gives single collinear logarithms .
these aspects are illustrated in the first order result for @xmath24 : @xmath33 \\ - \frac{\as}{2\pi } \frac{\ln 1/\tau}{q(x ) } \int_x^1 \frac{d z}{z } \left[q\left(\frac{x}{z}\right ) p_{qq } ( z ) + g\left(\frac{x}{z}\right ) p_{qg } ( z ) \right ] .\end{gathered}\ ] ] the first line contains the soft and collinear double logarithms ( which turn out to be identical to the @xmath3 result ) from the conditions on the @xmath34 and @xmath35 .
the second line contains the collinear logarithm associated with the restriction on the dglap evolution .
photon - gluon fusion plays a role only through this collinear logarithm , in the convolution with the gluon distribution .
the actual details of the resummation will be presented in @xcite .
schematically , the result is @xmath36 \frac{q(x,\tau q^2)}{q(x , q^2 ) } \ , \sigma(\tau),\qquad \sigma(\tau ) = e^ { - \frac{\as \cf}{2 \pi } \left[2 \ln^2 \frac1\tau - 3 \ln \frac1\tau \right ] + \co{\as^2\ln^3\frac1\tau}},\ ] ] where @xmath37 is just the corresponding @xmath3 quantity of @xcite and @xmath38 is a @xmath25-independent coefficient function which is given in @xcite .
the ratio @xmath39 comes from the suppression of radiation with @xmath40 , as mentioned above .
expanding to nlo it is possible to perform a comparison to the fixed order monte carlo programs disaster++ @xcite and disent @xcite .
we actually look at the coefficient of @xmath41 in @xmath42 where we have normalised to the the born cross section @xmath43 for simplicity . at second order eq . contains terms @xmath44 , @xmath45 and for the resummation to be correct to next - to - leading order we should correctly control terms @xmath46 .
so the difference between our expanded result and the exact result should at most be a constant for small @xmath25 .
the upper two plots of figure [ fig : disdis ] show our results for the quark and gluon - initiated components of the answer compared to the predictions from disaster++ .
the shape of the distributions is well reproduced for small @xmath25 .
the lower two plots show the difference between the disaster++ results and ours : one sees that for small @xmath25 this difference is indeed compatible with a constant , as required .
comparisons have also been made with disent , which seems to disagree with our result in the gluon sector at the level of a term proportional to @xmath47 , and perhaps also in the quark sector .
although we have results for the resummation of the thrust distribution in dis , some work remains to be done for the practical implementation of our results for comparison with experimental data .
in particular , prescriptions need to be defined for the matching of our resummed result with the fixed order results , in order extend the range of applicability of the calculation ( without the matching the results are applicable only to very small @xmath25 ) .
work is also in progress on the resummation of other dis event - shape variables . among these ,
the thrust normalised to the energy in the current hemisphere is close to completion .
other variables to be studied include the jet mass , the @xmath48-parameter and the jet - broadening ( the resummation of the latter is relevant also for predicting the form of the power correction @xcite ) .
once this programme is complete , we hope that it will lead to phenomenological studies analogous to those already being carried out in @xmath3 .
we benefited much from continuous discussions of this and related subjects with yuri dokshitzer , pino marchesini and mike seymour .
one of us ( va ) is grateful to yuri dokshitzer and pino marchesini for introducing him to perturbative qcd , and to the organisers and the participants of the 1999 u.k .
phenomenology workshop on collider physics for the invitation and for the stimulating atmosphere .
he would also like to thank n. brook and v. khoze for useful discussions .
this research was supported in part by murst , italy and by the eu fourth framework programme ` training and mobility of researchers ' , network ` quantum chromodynamics and the deep structure of elementary particles ' , contract fmrx - ct98 - 0194 ( dg 12-miht ) .
99 s. catani , l. trentadue , g. turnock and b.r .
webber , _ nucl .
* b 407 * ( 1993 ) 3 .
feynman r.p .
1972 _ photon hadron interactions _ ( w. a. benjamin , new york ) ; dokshitzer yu .
l. , khoze v.a . and troyan s.i .
1989,in _ perturbative quantum chromodynamics _
a. h. mueller , world scientific , singapore ) .
m. dasgupta and b.r .
webber , _ jhep _ * 10 * ( 1998 ) 001 [ hep - ph/9809247 ] .
gribov and l.n .
lipatov , _ sov .
_ * 15 * ( 1972 ) 438 ; + g. altarelli and g. parisi , _ nucl .
* b 126 * ( 1977 ) 298 ; + yu.l .
dokshitzer , _ sov .
* 46 * ( 1977 ) 641 . | standard practice in @xmath1 compare event - shape distributions with perturbative predictions resummation necessary two - jet limit large soft collinear logarithms spoils convergence fixed - order calculations resummed analyses led to information about strong coupling constant non - perturbative effects hera studies of event - shape distributions by collaborations @xcite no perturbative resummed calculations for comparison present preliminary results on calculation @xcite event shapes defined in current hemisphere @xcite to reduce contamination from remnant fragmentation distribution of emissions in current hemisphere @xmath2 analogous to single hemisphere @xmath1 differences arise from @xmath3 momentum current quark depends on remnant - hemisphere @xmath4 emissions necessitates resummed treatment of space - like branching of incoming parton simultaneous resummation of exists only for jet multiplicities @xcite or cross sections at large @xmath5 @xcite for thrust @xmath6 recoil from remnant hemisphere emissions divided into two parts soft and collinear emissions double logarithms collinear emissions single logarithms outlined in next sectioncross - check resummation expand nlo compare result fixed order monte carlo programs disaster++ @xcite disent @xcite illustrated section fixed future future developments definitions thrust dis differ axis normalisation consider thrust photon axis @xmath9 normalised @xmath10 @xmath11 sum extends over particles current hemisphere @xmath12 lowest order @xmath13 region requiring resummation @xmath14 close to zero expressing momenta sudakov components @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 remnant current directions write thrust as @xcite @xmath18 sums run over emitted particles @xmath19 @xmath20 component current quark dependence remnant hemisphere emissions arises @xmath21 @xmath22 consider cross section @xmath24 for @xmath14 smaller than @xmath25 virtual corrections exclusion emissions larger than @xmath25 remnant hemisphere exclude soft collinear emissions @xmath26 @xmath27 condition ensures particle in @xmath4 integration over @xmath28 @xmath29 double logarithm @xmath2 exclude soft collinear region @xmath30 double logarithmexclusion @xmath31 maximum transverse momentum implies stopping dglap @xcite parton evolution scale @xmath32 single collinear logarithms illustrated first order result @xmath24 : @xmath33 \frac{\as}{2\pi }{ 1/\tau}{q(x )_x^1{d z}{z }{z p_{qq } z )_{qg } z ) first line contains soft collinear double logarithms identical @xmath3 result conditions @xmath34 @xmath35 second line collinear logarithm restriction dglap evolution photon - gluon fusion collinear logarithm gluon distribution details resummation presented @xcite .result is @xmath36 \frac{q(x,\tau q^2)}^2 ) \sigma(\tau), ) = e^ { - \frac{ \cf}{2 \pi } \left \ln^2 \frac1\tau - 3 \tau + {\as^2\ln^3\frac1\tau}} @xmath37 @xmath3 quantity @xcite @xmath38 @xmath25-independent coefficient function in @xcite ratio @xmath39 from suppression radiation with @xmath40 comparison to fixed order monte carlo programs disaster++ @xcite disent @xcite coefficient @xmath41 in @xmath42 normalised cross section @xmath43 second order terms @xmath44 @xmath45 control terms @xmath46 difference expanded result exact result constant for small @xmath25 upper two plots show results quark gluon - initiated components compared predictions disaster++ distributions reproduced for small @xmath25 lower plots show difference disaster++ results small @xmath25 compatible with constantcomparisons made with disent with result in gluon sector proportional to @xmath47 quark sector results for resummation thrust distribution in dis work for implementation for comparison with experimental data prescriptions need for matching resummed result with fixed order results range applicability calculation results applicable to small @xmath25 work progress on resummation of dis event - shape variables thrust normalised to energy current hemisphere close to completion variables include jet mass @xmath48-parameter jet - broadening resummation relevant for predicting power correction @xcite programme hope to phenomenological studies analogous to @xmath3 benefited from discussions with yuri dokshitzer pino marchesini mike seymour grateful to yuri dokshitzer pino marchesini for perturbative qcd organisers participants 1999 u phenomenology workshop on collider physics n. brook v. khoze for discussions research supported by murst italy eu fourth framework programme training mobility researchers network quantum chromodynamics deep structure of elementary particles contract fmrx - ct98 - 0194 s. catani l. trentadue g. turnock b.r .webber nucl 407 1993 ) feynman r 1972 photon hadron interactions benjamin new york dokshitzer yu khoze v troyan s.i 1989 perturbative quantum chromodynamics mueller world scientific singapore dasgupta webber jhep 10 1998 ) 001 hep - ph/9809247 gribov sov 15 * 1972 ) 438 g altarelli g. parisi nucl 126 1977 ) 298 dokshitzer sov 46 1977 ) 641 | 0.348146 | 2,212 | 1,160 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,130 | by using the method developed in the paper [ _ georg . inter .
j. sci . tech . ,
_ volume 3 , issue 1 ( 2011 ) , 107 - 129 ] , it is obtained a representation in an explicit form of the weak solution of a linear partial differential equation of the higher order in two variables with initial condition whose coefficients are real - valued simple step functions * 2000 mathematics subject classification : * primary 34axx ; secondary 34a35 , 34k06 . *
key words and phrases : * linear partial differential equation of the higher order in two variables , fourier differential operator . | in @xcite has been obtained a representation in an explicit form of the solution of the linear partial differential equation of the higher order in two variables with initial condition whose coefficients were real - valued coefficients .
the aim of the present manuscript is resolve an analogous problem for a linear partial differential equation of the higher order in two variables with initial condition whose coefficients are real - valued simple step functions .
the paper is organized as follows . in section 2 , we consider some auxiliary results obtained in the paper @xcite . in section 3 , it is obtained a representation in an explicit form of the weak solution of the partial differential equation of the higher order in two variables with initial condition whose coefficients are real - valued simple step functions .
fourier differential operator @xmath0 in @xmath1 is defined as follows : @xmath2 for @xmath3 , let @xmath4 be a vector space of all @xmath5-times differentiable functions on @xmath6 such that for arbitrary @xmath7 , a series obtained by a differentiation term by term of the fourier series of @xmath8 pointwise converges to @xmath9 for all @xmath10 .
let @xmath11 .
let @xmath12 be an embedding of the @xmath13 in to @xmath1 which sends a function to a sequence of real numbers consisting from its fourier coefficients .
i.e. , if @xmath14 then @xmath15 . then , for @xmath11 , the following equality @xmath16 holds . assume that for @xmath11 , we have the following representation @xmath17 by the definition of the class @xmath13 , we have @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 by the definition of the composition of mappings , we have @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 by the scheme used in the proof of lemma 2.1 , we can get the validity of the following assertion .
let @xmath12 be an embedding of the @xmath4 in to @xmath1 which sends a function to a sequence of real numbers consisting from its fourier coefficients .
then , for @xmath25 and @xmath26 , the following equality @xmath27 holds .
@xcite if @xmath28 is the real matrix @xmath29 then @xmath30 for @xmath31 , let us consider a linear autonomous nonhomogeneous ordinary differential equations of the first order @xmath32 with initial condition @xmath33 where @xmath34 @xmath35 ; @xmath36 @xmath37 is the sequence of continuous functions of a parameter @xmath38 on @xmath39 . for each @xmath40
, we put @xmath41 @xmath42 then the solution of ( 2.6)-(2.7 ) is given by @xmath43 where @xmath44 denotes an exponent of the matrix @xmath45 and it exactly coincides with an infinite - dimensional @xmath46 -cellular matrix @xmath47 with cells @xmath48 for which @xmath49 and @xmath50 where for @xmath40 , @xmath51 and @xmath52 are defined by ( 2.8)-(2.9 ) , respectively . we know that if we have a linear autonomous inhomogeneous ordinary differential equations of the first order @xmath53 with initial condition @xmath54 where @xmath34 @xmath35 ; @xmath36 @xmath55 is the sequence of continuous functions of parameter @xmath38 on @xmath39 ; @xmath56 @xmath57 is an infinite dimensional @xmath46-cellular matrix with cells @xmath58 .
then the solution of ( 2.6)-(2.7 ) is given by ( cf .
@xcite , 6 , section 1 ) @xmath59 where @xmath60 and @xmath61 denote exponents of matrices @xmath62 and @xmath63 , respectively .
note that @xmath64 is an infinite - dimensional @xmath46-cellular matrix with cells @xmath65 such that @xmath66 and @xmath67 for @xmath40 . under notations ( 2.8)-(2.9 ) , by using example 2.4 we get that for @xmath68 , @xmath60 exactly coincides with an infinite - dimensional @xmath46 -cellular matrix @xmath47 with cells @xmath48 for which @xmath49 and @xmath69 note that , for @xmath70 , the matrix @xmath61 exactly coincides with an infinite - dimensional @xmath46 -cellular matrix @xmath71 .
the following proposition is a simple consequence of lemma 2.5 . for @xmath31 ,
let us consider a linear partial differential equation @xmath72 with initial condition @xmath73 if @xmath74 is such a sequence of real numbers that a series @xmath75 defined by @xmath76 @xmath77 belongs to the class @xmath78 as a series of a variable @xmath79 for all @xmath80 , and is differentiable term by term as a series of a variable @xmath38 for all @xmath10 , then @xmath81 is a solution of @xmath82-@xmath83 .
let @xmath84 and @xmath85 .
suppose that @xmath86 for @xmath31 , let us consider a partial differential equation @xmath87 with initial condition @xmath88 ( iii ) for each fixed @xmath10 , the function @xmath75 is continuous with respect to @xmath92 , and for each @xmath93 the function @xmath75 is continuous with respect to @xmath79 on @xmath6 except points @xmath94 .
@xmath118 setting @xmath119 and @xmath120 for @xmath116 we obtain @xmath121 and @xmath122 it is obvious that the system of equations ( 3.13)-(3.14 ) has the unique solution which can be done as follows : @xmath123 and @xmath124 for @xmath116 .
it is obvious that under nice restrictions on coefficients participated in ( 3.1 ) and ( 3.2 ) , we can continue our procedure step by step .
correspondingly we can construct a sequence @xmath128 such that @xmath129 satisfies a linear partial differential equation @xmath130 with initial condition @xmath131 notice that for each natural number @xmath207 , one can easily modify the mathlab program described in example 3.3 for obtaining the graphical solution of the linear partial differential equation ( 3.1)-(3.2 ) whose coefficients @xmath208 are real - valued simple step functions on @xmath209 and @xmath210 is a trigonometric polynomial on @xmath6 .
since each constant @xmath211 same times is a step function we can use mathlab program described in example 3.3 for a solution of the linear partial differential equation ( 2.17)-(2.18 ) with constant coefficients .
the approach used for a solution of ( 3.1)-(3.2 ) can be used in such a case when coefficients @xmath217 are rather smooth continuous functions on @xmath218 .
if we will approximate @xmath219 by real - valued simple step functions , then it is natural to wait that under some `` nice restrictions '' on @xmath219 the solutions obtained by theorem 3.2 , will give us a `` good approximation '' of the solution of the required linear partial differential equation of the higher order in two variables with corresponding initial conditions . | @xcite obtained representation solution linear partial differential equation higher order two variables coefficients real - valued aim present manuscript resolve analogous problem linear partial differential equation higher order two variables coefficients real - valued functions paper organized section 2 auxiliary results @xcite section 3 obtained representation weak solution partial differential equation higher order two variables coefficients real - valued step functions fourier differential operator @xmath0 @xmath1 defined @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 vector space @xmath5-times differentiable functions @xmath6 arbitrary @xmath7 series differentiation fourier series @xmath8 converges to @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 embedding @xmath13 @xmath1 sends function to sequence real numbers fourier coefficients @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath11 equality @xmath16 holds @xmath11 representation @xmath17 definition class @xmath13 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 composition mappings @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 scheme proof lemma 2.1 validity following assertion.@xmath12 @xmath4 @xmath1 sends function real numbers fourier coefficients @xmath25 @xmath26 equality @xmath27 holds @xmath28 real matrix @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 linear autonomous nonhomogeneous ordinary differential equations @xmath32 initial condition @xmath33 @xmath34 continuous functions @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 solution 2.6)-(2.7 ) @xmath43 @xmath44 exponent matrix @xmath45 coincides infinite - dimensional @xmath46 -cellular matrix @xmath47 cells @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath40 @xmath51 @xmath52 defined ( 2.8)-(2.9 ) linear autonomous inhomogeneous ordinary differential equations @xmath53 initial condition @xmath54 @xmath34 continuous functions @xmath38 @xmath39 infinite dimensional @xmath46-cellular matrix cells @xmath58 solution ( 2.6)-(2.7 ) @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 exponents matrices @xmath62 @xmath63@xmath64 infinite - dimensional @xmath46-cellular matrix cells @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath40-(2.9 example 2.4 @xmath68 @xmath60 coincides infinite - dimensional matrix @xmath47 cells @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath69 @xmath70 matrix @xmath61 coincides infinite - dimensional matrix @xmath71 consequence lemma 2.5 @xmath31 linear partial differential equation @xmath72 condition @xmath73 @xmath74 sequence real numbers series @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 series variable @xmath79 @xmath80 differentiable series variable @xmath38 @xmath10 @xmath81 solution @xmath82-@xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath31 partial differential equation @xmath87 initial condition @xmath88 @xmath10 function @xmath75 continuous @xmath92 @xmath93 continuous @xmath79 @xmath6 @xmath94 @xmath119 @xmath120 @xmath116 @xmath121 @xmath122 system equations ( 3.13)-(3.14 ) unique solution @xmath123 @xmath124 @xmath116under restrictions coefficients 3.1 3.2 continue procedure construct sequence @xmath128 @xmath129 satisfies linear partial differential equation @xmath130 condition @xmath131 each natural number @xmath207 modify mathlab program 3.3 graphical solution differential equation 3.1)-(3.2 ) coefficients @xmath208 step functions @xmath209 @xmath210 trigonometric polynomial @xmath6 each constant @xmath211 step function use mathlab program 3.3 solution linear partial differential equation ( 2.17)-(2.18 ) with constant coefficients approach solution 3.1)-(3.2 ) coefficients @xmath217 smooth continuous functions on @xmath218 approximate @xmath219 by real - valued step functions restrictions @xmath219 solutions theorem 3.2 good approximation linear partial differential equation higher order two variables initial conditions | 0.262292 | 1,656 | 933 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,138 | it is shown that given two copies of a @xmath0-ary input channel @xmath1 , where @xmath0 is prime , it is possible to create two channels @xmath2 and @xmath3 whose symmetric capacities satisfy @xmath4 , where the inequalities are strict except in trivial cases .
this leads to a simple proof of channel polarization in the @xmath0-ary case .
channel polarization , polar codes , entropy inequality . | arikan s _ polar codes _
@xcite are a class of ` symmetric capacity'-achieving codes for binary - input channels .
their block error probability behaves roughly like @xmath5 @xcite , where @xmath6 is the blocklength , and they achieve this performance at an encoding / decoding complexity of order @xmath7 .
polar codes for non - binary input channels were considered in @xcite . as in the binary case ,
their construction is based on recursively creating new channels from several copies of the original : let @xmath1 be a discrete memoryless channel with input alphabet @xmath8 . throughout this note
, @xmath0 will be assumed to be a prime number .
the output alphabet @xmath9 may be arbitrary .
we will let @xmath10 $ ] denote the mutual information developed across @xmath1 with uniformly distributed inputs .
] , i.e. , @xmath11 let @xmath12 , @xmath13 be independent , uniformly distributed inputs to two independent copies of @xmath1 , and let @xmath14 , @xmath15 be the corresponding outputs . consider the one - to - one mapping @xmath16
@xmath17 where ` @xmath18 ' denotes modulo-@xmath0 addition .
observe that @xmath19 and @xmath20 are independent and uniformly distributed over @xmath21 .
define the channels @xmath22 described through the conditional output probability distributions @xmath23 it follows from the chain rule of mutual information that @xmath24 .
it is also easy to see that @xmath3 is better than @xmath1 , whereas @xmath2 is worse , in the sense that @xmath25 since @xmath2 and @xmath3 are also @xmath0-ary input channels , the above procedure can be applied to each of them , creating the channels @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , and @xmath29 . repeating this procedure @xmath30 times , one obtains @xmath31 channels , @xmath32 , @xmath33 , with @xmath34 .
the main observation that leads the author of @xcite to construct polar codes is that these channels are _ polarized _ in the following sense : [ thm : q - polarization ] @xmath35\big\}=i(w),\ ] ] @xmath36 for all @xmath37 .
the proofs given in @xcite and @xcite for theorem [ thm : q - polarization ] are based on the following arguments : the symmetric mutual informations of the channels @xmath38 created by the above procedure have a martingale property , from which it follows that they must converge for almost all paths in the construction .
this shows that both limits in theorem [ thm : q - polarization ] exist .
to prove the claim on these limits values , it would be sufficient to show that holds with strict inequalities for all @xmath38 , unless @xmath39 .
observe , however , that since the output alphabets of channels @xmath38 grow as the construction size increases , this approach would require the aforementioned inequality to hold uniformly for all @xmath0-ary input channels .
this difficulty is circumvented in @xcite and @xcite by appropriately defining an auxiliary channel parameter @xmath40 and proving the convergence of @xmath41 to @xmath42 by the above arguments , which then implies the convergence of @xmath43 to @xmath42 .
the purpose of this note is to provide a proof of theorem [ thm : q - polarization ] that avoids this indirect approach . in order to do so
, we will need the following theorem .
[ thm : main ] if @xmath44 for some @xmath37 , then there exists an @xmath45 such that @xmath46 the dependence of @xmath47 on the channel @xmath1 is only through @xmath48 , and not through particular channel specifications ( e.g. , output alphabet size )
. theorem [ thm : main ] will be proved as a corollary to the following lemma , which is the main result reported here .
[ lem : entropy ] let @xmath49 , @xmath50 be random variables with joint probability density @xmath51 if @xmath52 for some @xmath37 , then there exists an @xmath45 such that @xmath53 we will prove lemma [ lem : entropy ] in section [ sec : proof ] .
it suffices to show that @xmath54 , as the equality @xmath24 will then imply the second half of the claim .
let @xmath49 denote two independent and uniformly distributed inputs to two copies of @xmath1 , and let @xmath50 be the corresponding outputs . since @xmath1 is memoryless , @xmath55 are jointly distributed as in .
further , @xmath44 implies @xmath56 it then follows from lemma [ lem : entropy ] that @xmath57 completing the proof .
let @xmath58 be @xmath59-valued i.i.d .
random variables with @xmath60=\pr[b_1=+]=\tfrac12 $ ] .
let @xmath61 be random variables defined as @xmath62 note that @xmath63 takes values in @xmath64 $ ] .
further , it follows from the relation @xmath24 that @xmath65=i_n$ ] .
hence , the process @xmath61 is a bounded martingale , and therefore converges almost surely to a @xmath64$]-valued random variable @xmath66 .
note , on the other hand , that @xmath67=\frac1{2^n}\#\big\{\mathbf{s}\in\{-,+\}^n\colon i(w^\mathbf{s})\in(\delta,1-\delta)\big\}.\ ] ] to conclude the proof , it thus suffices to show that @xmath68=i(w)$ ] and @xmath69=1-i(w)$ ] . to that end , note that the almost sure convergence of @xmath63 implies @xmath70=\mathbb{e}[i(w^{b_1\dotsc b_n+})-i(w^{b_1\dotsc b_n})]\to0 $ ] .
it follows from theorem [ thm : main ] that the latter convergence implies @xmath71 with probability @xmath72 . due to the martingale property of @xmath63
we have @xmath73=\mathbb{e}[i_0]=i(w)$ ] , from which it follows that @xmath68=1-\pr[i_\infty=0]=i(w)$ ] , completing the proof .
in what follows , @xmath74 and @xmath75 will both denote the entropy of a random variable @xmath76 with probability distribution @xmath77 .
we will let @xmath78 , @xmath79 denote the probability distribution with @xmath80 the cyclic convolution of vectors @xmath77 and @xmath81 will be denoted by @xmath82 .
that is , @xmath83 we will also let @xmath84 denote the uniform distribution over @xmath21 .
we will use the following lemmas in the proof : [ lem : variation - divergence ] let @xmath77 be a distribution over @xmath21 .
then , @xmath85 .\ ] ] lemma [ lem : variation - divergence ] partially complements pinsker s inequality by providing a lower bound to the @xmath86 distance between an arbitrary probability distribution and the uniform distribution by their kullback leibler divergence .
@xmath87\\ & \le q\log e \sum_i p(i)|p(i)-1/q|\\ & \le q\log e\|p-\uni(\mathcal{x})\|_1,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we used the relation @xmath88 in the first inequality
. lemma [ lem : variation - divergence ] holds for distributions over arbitrary finite sets . that @xmath89 is a prime number has no bearing on the above proof .
[ lem : shift - distance ] let @xmath77 be a distribution over @xmath21 . then , @xmath90 for all @xmath91 , @xmath92 . that is , unless @xmath77 is the uniform distribution , its cyclic shifts will be separated from each other in the @xmath86 distance .
let @xmath93 for some @xmath94 .
we will show that there exists a @xmath95 satisfying @xmath96 which will yield the claim since @xmath97 .
suppose that @xmath98 , as the claim is trivial otherwise .
let @xmath99 denote the @xmath100th largest element of @xmath77 , and let @xmath101 .
note that @xmath102 is a proper subset of @xmath21 .
we have @xmath103&=p^{(1)}-p^{(|s|+1)}\\ & \ge p^{(1)}-1/q\\ & \ge \frac1{2(q-1)}\|p-\uni(\cx)\|_1\\ & \ge \frac{1-h(p)}{2q(q-1)\log e}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the above , the second inequality is obtained by observing that @xmath104 is smallest when @xmath105 , and the third inequality follows from lemma [ lem : variation - divergence ] .
therefore , there exists at least one @xmath106 such that @xmath107 given such an @xmath100 , let @xmath108 . since @xmath0 is prime , @xmath21 can be written as @xmath109 for any @xmath95 and @xmath110 .
therefore , since @xmath111 is a proper subset of @xmath21 , there exists a @xmath112 such that @xmath113 , implying @xmath114 which yields the claim .
[ lem : h - convolution ] let @xmath77 and @xmath81 be two probability distributions over @xmath21 , with @xmath115 and @xmath116 for some @xmath117 .
then , there exists an @xmath118 such that @xmath119 let @xmath120 denote the distribution with a unit mass on @xmath79 . since @xmath121 , it follows from the continuity of entropy that @xmath122 for some @xmath123 . on the other hand , since @xmath116 , we have by lemma [ lem : shift - distance ] that @xmath124 for all pairs @xmath92 .
relations , , and the strict concavity of entropy implies the existence of @xmath118 such that @xmath125 let @xmath126 and @xmath127 be two random probability distributions on @xmath21 , with @xmath128 it is then easy to see that @xmath129,\\ h(x_2\mid y_2)&=\mathbb{e}[h(p_2)],\\ h(x_1+x_2\mid y_1,y_2)&=\mathbb{e}[h(p_1\ast p_2)].\end{aligned}\ ] ] suppose , without loss of generality , that @xmath130 .
it suffices to show that if @xmath131,\mathbb{e}[h(p_2)]\in(\delta,1-\delta)$ ] for some @xmath37 , then there exists an @xmath45 such that @xmath132\ge\mathbb{e}[h(p_1)]+\epsilon(\delta)$ ] . to that end , define the event @xmath133 observe that @xmath134\\ & \le \big(1-\pr[h(p_1)>\delta/2]\big)\cdot\delta/2+\pr[h(p_1)>\delta/2],\end{aligned}\ ] ] implying @xmath135>\tfrac{\delta}{2-\delta}$ ] .
it similarly follows that @xmath136>\tfrac{\delta}{2-\delta}$ ] .
note further that @xmath137 and @xmath138 are independent since @xmath14 and @xmath15 are .
thus , @xmath111 has probability at least @xmath139 . on the other hand , lemma [ lem : h - convolution ] implies that conditioned on @xmath111 we have @xmath140 for some @xmath141 .
thus , @xmath142\\&=\pr[a]\cdot\mathbb{e}[h(p_1\ast p_2)\mid a]+\pr[a^c]\cdot\mathbb{e}[h(p_1\ast p_2)\mid a^c]\\ & \ge\pr[a]\cdot \mathbb{e}[\big(h(p_1)+\epsilon_1(\delta/2)\big)\mid a]\\ & \hspace{10em}+\pr[a^c]\cdot\mathbb{e}[h(p_1)\mid a^c]\\ & \ge \mathbb{e}[h(p_1)]+\epsilon_1(\delta/2)\epsilon_2(\delta),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the first inequality we used and the relation @xmath143 . setting @xmath144 yields the result .
the proof of theorem [ thm : main ] does not extend trivially to the case of composite input alphabet sizes .
in particular , that the cyclic group @xmath145 is generated by each of its non - zero elements is crucial to the proof of lemma [ lem : shift - distance ] . on the other hand ,
a weaker statement holds when the input alphabet size is composite : consider replacing the mapping with @xmath146 where @xmath147 is a permutation over @xmath21 , and define the channels @xmath148 and @xmath149 accordingly .
then , it can be shown that there exists a permutation @xmath147 for which theorem [ thm : main ] holds , irrespective of the input alphabet size .
the proof of this statement is similar to that of theorem [ thm : main ] , and therefore is omitted .
it then follows that channels with composite input alphabet sizes can be polarized in the sense of theorem [ thm : q - polarization ] if the mapping in is chosen appropriately at each step of construction . whether such channels can be polarized by recursive application of a _ fixed _
mapping is an open question .
i would like to thank emre telatar for helpful discussions
. 1 e. arkan , `` channel polarization : a method for constructing capacity - achieving codes for symmetric binary - input memoryless channels , '' _ ieee trans .
inform . theory _
it-55 , pp .
30513073 , july 2009 . | arikan s polar codes @xcite symmetric capacity codes for binary - input channels block error probability like @xmath5 @xcite @xmath6 blocklength performance at encoding decoding complexity @xmath7 polar codes non - binary input channels in @xcite construction creating new channels from copies original @xmath1 discrete memoryless channel input alphabet @xmath8 @xmath0 prime number output alphabet @xmath9 arbitrary @xmath10 mutual information @xmath1 uniformly distributed inputs @xmath13 independent distributed inputs @xmath1 @xmath14 @xmath15 corresponding outputs one - to - one mapping @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 denotes modulo-@xmath0 addition @xmath19 @xmath20 independent uniformly distributed over @xmath21 define channels @xmath22 conditional output probability distributions @xmath23 chain rule mutual information @xmath24 @xmath3 better than @xmath1 @xmath2 worse @xmath2 @xmath0-ary input channels procedure creating channels @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29repeating procedure times obtains @xmath31 channels observation leads author @xcite construct polar codes channels polarized q - polarization ] @xmath35 @xmath36 for @xmath37 proofs in @xcite for theorem q - polarization based on arguments symmetric informations of channels @xmath38 have martingale property converge for all paths construction shows limits in theorem q - polarization exist prove claim limits to show strict inequalities for all @xmath38 unless @xmath39 output alphabets of channels grow as construction size increases approach inequality to hold uniformly for all @xmath0 input channels difficulty circumvented by defining auxiliary channel parameter @xmath40 proving convergence of @xmath41 to @xmath42 arguments implies convergence of @xmath43 to @xmath42 purpose note provide proof of theorem : q - polarization ] avoids indirect approach need theorem if @xmath44 for some @xmath37 exists @xmath45 dependence of @xmath47 on channel @xmath1 through @xmath48 not particular channel specificationsoutput alphabet size theorem main ] proved corollary lemma main result entropy @xmath49 @xmath50 random variables joint probability density @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath37 @xmath45 @xmath53 prove lemma entropy section sec proof ] show @xmath54 equality @xmath24 imply second half claim @xmath49 two independent uniformly distributed inputs two copies @xmath1 @xmath50 corresponding outputs @xmath1 memoryless @xmath55 jointly distributed @xmath44 implies @xmath56 lemma entropy @xmath57 proof @xmath58 @xmath59-valued random variables @xmath60=\pr[b_1=+]=\tfrac12 $ ] @xmath61 random variables @xmath62 @xmath63 takes values @xmath64 $ relation @xmath24 @xmath65=i_n$ ] process @xmath61 bounded martingale converges to @xmath64$]-valued random variable @xmath66 @xmath67=\frac1{2^n}\#\big\{\mathbf{s}\in-+^n\delta.conclude proof show @xmath68=i(w)$ @xmath69=1-i(w)$ almost convergence @xmath63 implies @xmath70=\mathbb[i-i theorem latter convergence implies @xmath71 probability @xmath72 martingale property @xmath63 @xmath73=\mathbb{e}[i=i(w)$ ] @xmath68=1-\pr[i\infty=0]=i(w)$ ] completing proof @xmath74 @xmath75 denote entropy random variable @xmath76 probability distribution @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 denote probability distribution @xmath80 cyclic convolution vectors @xmath77 @xmath81 denoted by @xmath82 @xmath84 denote uniform distribution over @xmath21 use lemmas proof variation - divergence @xmath77 distribution over @xmath21 @xmath85 lemma variation - divergence complements pinsker s inequality lower bound @xmath86 distance between arbitrary probability distribution uniform distribution leibler divergence@xmath87\\ q\log \sum_i p(i))-1/q-\uni(\mathcal{x})\|_1{aligned used relation @xmath88 first inequality lemma variation - divergence holds distributions over sets @xmath89 prime number no bearing proof shift distance @xmath77 distribution over @xmath21 @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 unless @xmath77 uniform distribution cyclic shifts separated @xmath86 distance @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath95 satisfying @xmath96 claim @xmath97 @xmath98 claim trivial @xmath99 @xmath100th largest element @xmath77 @xmath101 @xmath102 subset @xmath21 @xmath103&=p^{(1)}-p^{(|s|+1)}\\ p^{(1)}-1/q\\ \frac1{2(q-1)}\|p-\uni(\cx)\|_1\\\frac{1-h(p)}{2q(q-1)\log e}{aligned} second inequality @xmath104 smallest when @xmath105 third inequality from lemma variation - divergence one @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath100 @xmath108@xmath0 prime @xmath21 written as @xmath109 @xmath95 @xmath110 @xmath111 subset @xmath21 @xmath112 @xmath113 implying @xmath114 yields claim convolution @xmath77 @xmath81 probability distributions over @xmath21 @xmath115 @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath118 @xmath119 @xmath120 distribution unit mass @xmath79 @xmath121 follows continuity entropy @xmath122 @xmath123 @xmath116 distance @xmath124 pairs @xmath92 concavity entropy implies @xmath118 @xmath125 @xmath126 @xmath127 random probability distributions on @xmath21 @xmath128 @xmath129 h(x_2\mid y_2)&=\mathbb{e}[h(p_2)] h(x_1+x_2\mid y_1_2)=\mathbb{e}[h(p_1 p_2)]{aligned @xmath130 @xmath131,\mathbb{e}[h(p_2)](\delta,1-\delta) @xmath37 @xmath45 @xmath132\mathbb{e}[h(p_1)]+\epsilon(\delta)$define event @xmath133 @xmath134\\\big(1-\pr[h(p_1)>\delta/2]\delta/2+\pr[h\delta/2]{aligned implying @xmath135>\tfrac{\delta}{2-\delta}$ @xmath136>\tfrac{\delta}{2-\delta}$ @xmath137 @xmath138 independent @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath111 probability @xmath139 lemma h - convolution implies conditioned @xmath111 @xmath140 @xmath141 @xmath142\\=\pr[a]\cdot\mathbb{e}[h(p_1 p_2)+\pr[a^c] a[a]{e}[(h(p_1)+\epsilon_1(\delta/2)) a}+\pr[a^c]} a^c}[h(p_1)]+\epsilon_1(\delta/2)\epsilon_2(\delta),\end{aligned} first inequality relation @xmath143 setting @xmath144 yields result proof theorem extend composite input alphabet sizescyclic group @xmath145 generated by non - zero elements crucial to proof lemma shift - distance weaker statement holds when input alphabet size composite replacing mapping with @xmath146 @xmath147 permutation over @xmath21 define channels @xmath148 @xmath149 permutation @xmath147 theorem [ thm : main ] holds irrespective of input alphabet size proof statement similar to theorem thm : main omitted channels with composite input alphabet sizes polarized theorem : q - polarization if mapping chosen at each step construction channels by recursive application fixed mapping open question emre telatar for discussions arkan channel polarization method for constructing capacity - codes for symmetric binary - input memoryless channels theory july 2009 | 0.495413 | 3,196 | 1,762 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,139 | we find no evidence for high - energy photoproduction of pentaquarks at 1540mev@xmath0 , 1862mev@xmath0 , or 3099mev@xmath0 using decay modes @xmath1 , @xmath2 , and @xmath3 , respectively . | a 47@xmath4 significant pentaquark with a mass of @xmath51540mev@xmath0 decaying to @xmath1 or @xmath6 has been reported by ten experiments@xmath7.combining the mass measurements of these experiments we find @xmath8mev@xmath0 .
the @xmath9 for this averaging is @xmath10 giving a confidence level of @xmath11 , a 5.2@xmath4 problem .
pentaquarks with two strange quarks@xcite and with a charm quark@xcite have also been reported .
focus ran during the 19967 fixed - target run at fermilab .
a photon beam from brehmsstrahlung of a 300 gev electron and positron beam impacts beo targets .
16 silicon strip planes provide vertexing and tracking .
charged particles are tracked and momentum analyzed as they pass through up to two dipole magnets and up to five sets of multiwire proportional chambers .
three erenkov counters , two em calorimeters , and two muon detectors identify particles . a hadronic trigger requiring @xmath525gev of energy passed 7 billion events for reconstruction .
thus , these events are well above threshold for pentaquark production .
charge conjugates are assumed for these analyses and all pentaquarks are assumed to decay strongly .
we search for @xmath13 and measure the production relative to two similar decays , @xmath14 and @xmath15 .
the data is from events with a reconstructed @xmath16 or @xmath17@xcite . selecting vee candidates within @xmath18 of the nominal mass we obtain @xmath19 @xmath20 ( @xmath21 @xmath22 ) candidates with 92% ( 96% ) purity .
the remaining good quality tracks must form a good vertex ( cl @xmath23 1%).the proton candidate must pass stringent erenkov i d cuts , reducing the misidentification rate to @xmath50 .
the @xmath24 and @xmath25 are fit with a simple breit - wigner plus background of @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the energy release .
we find @xmath28 @xmath24 , @xmath29 @xmath30 , and @xmath31 @xmath32 signal events .
no pentaquark evidence is seen in the the @xmath1 mass plot ( fig.[fig : mpks ] ) .
we obtain 95% cl limits on the yield by determing how much the fitted yield must be increased to change the log - likelihood by 1.92 ( continually minimizing the background parameters ) .
this procedure is performed with a breit - wigner width of @xmath33 and 15mev@xmath0 , both with gaussian resolution varying from 2.363.07mev@xmath0 .
the maximum limit on the yield over the mass range 1.511.56gev@xmath0 is 754 ( 2252 ) for @xmath34 of 0 ( 15 ) mev@xmath0 . to set cross section limits we generate pentaquarks the same as @xmath30 . using pythia production and focus mc simulation of @xmath24 , @xmath25 , and @xmath35 events
we convert the yield limits into cross section ratio limits . for @xmath36@xmath37@xmath38@xmath371.56gev@xmath0 ,
the 95% cl limit on the production of @xmath35 relative to combined @xmath30 and @xmath32 is 0.7% ( 2.1% ) for @xmath34 of 0 ( 15 ) mev@xmath0 .
relative to @xmath24 , the limit is 0.06% ( 0.17% ) for @xmath34 of 0 ( 15 ) mev@xmath0 .
we account for all branching ratios and assume @xmath39 . in search for @xmath40.,width=480,height=154 ]
focus reconstruction of @xmath42 is described in ref.@xcite .
we select 800,000 @xmath43 candidates of which 75% are signal .
we search for @xmath44 and the @xmath45 pentaquark candidate @xmath46 .
we require the production and @xmath47 vertices have cl @xmath48 1% and separated by less than @xmath49 . the pion candidate must have a erenkov signature consistent with a pion .
we find @xmath50 @xmath51 events and no evidence for @xmath52 as shown in fig.[fig : xiplots ] .
the yield upper limit calculated at a mass of @xmath53gev@xmath0 is 114 ( 170 ) for @xmath34 of 0 ( 15 ) mev@xmath0 with resolution @xmath54mev@xmath0 .
assuming production like @xmath51 we find @xmath55 at 95% cl for @xmath34 of 0 ( 15 ) mev@xmath0 .
( left ) for @xmath51 and @xmath56 for @xmath52.,title="fig:",width=238,height=172 ] ( left ) for @xmath51 and @xmath56 for @xmath52.,title="fig:",width=238,height=172 ]
using standard focus charm reconstruction techniques we obtain a clean sample of @xmath58 @xmath59 events and @xmath60 events ( fig .
[ fig : thetacplots ] ) . combining @xmath61 @xmath62 and @xmath63 @xmath64 candidates with a positively identified proton we find no evidence for a charm pentaquark as shown in fig .
[ fig : thetacplots ] . 0 t. nakano _ et al .
_ [ leps collaboration ] , ( 91,012002,2003 )
. v. v. barmin _ et al . _ [ diana collaboration ] , ( 66,1715,2003 ) .
s. stepanyan _ et al . _ [ clas collaboration ] , ( 91,252001,2003 ) .
j. barth _ et al .
_ [ saphir collaboration ] , ( b572,127,2003 ) .
a. e. asratyan , _ et al .
_ , ( 67,682,2004 ) . v. kubarovsky _ et al .
_ [ clas collaboration ] , ( 92,032001,2004 ) .
a. airapetian _ et al . _
[ hermes collaboration ] , ( b585,213,2004 ) .
a. aleev _ et al .
_ [ svd collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0401024 m. abdel - bary _ et al . _ [ cosy - tof collaboration ] , ( b595,127,2004 ) .
s. chekanov _ et al . _
[ zeus collaboration ] , ( b591,7,2004 ) c. alt _ et al . _
[ na49 collaboration],(92,042003,2004 ) .
a. aktas _ et al .
[ h1 collaboration ] , ( b588,17,2004 ) . j. m. link _ et al . _
[ focus collaboration ] , ( a484,174,2002 ) . | 47@xmath4 pentaquark mass @xmath51540mev@xmath0 decaying @xmath1 reported ten experiments@xmath7 mass measurements @xmath8mev@xmath0 @xmath9 @xmath10 confidence @xmath11 5.2@xmath4 problem pentaquarks two strange quarks charm quark reported focus 19967 fixed target run fermilab photon 300 gev electron impacts targets 16 silicon strip planes vertexing tracking charged particles tracked analyzed two dipole magnets five multiwire chambers three erenkov counters two calorimeters two muon detectors identify particles hadronic trigger @xmath525gev energy passed 7 billion events reconstruction above threshold pentaquark production charge conjugates assumed pentaquarks decay strongly search for @xmath13 measure production decays data events reconstructed @xmath16 @xmath17@xcite selecting vee candidates @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 candidates 92% purity remaining quality tracks form vertex @xmath23 proton candidate pass erenkov cuts misidentification rate @xmath50@xmath24 fit with breit - wigner background @xmath26 @xmath27 energy release find @xmath28 signal events no pentaquark evidence in @xmath1 mass plot obtain 95% cl limits yield fitted yield log - likelihood by 1.92 minimizing background parameters procedure with breit - wigner width @xmath33 15mev@xmath0 gaussian resolution 2.363.07mev@xmath0 maximum limit yield over mass range 1.511.56gev@xmath0 754 ( 2252 ) for @xmath34 of set cross section limits generate pentaquarks @xmath30 pythia production focus mc simulation convert yield limits into cross section ratio limits @xmath36.56gev@xmath0 95% cl limit production @xmath35 relative 0.7% ( 2.1% ) for @xmath34 of limit 0.06% ( 0.17% ) for @xmath34 of account for branching ratios assume @xmath39 search for @xmath40 reconstruction @xmath42 select 800,000 @xmath43 candidates 75% signal search @xmath44 @xmath45 pentaquark candidate @xmath46 require production @xmath47 vertices cl @xmath48 1% separated less than @xmath49 pion candidate erenkov signature consistent pion find @xmath50 @xmath51 events no evidence @xmath52 yield upper limit mass @xmath53gev@xmath0 114 ( 170 ) @xmath34 0 15 mev@xmath0 resolution @xmath54mev@xmath0 production like @xmath51 find @xmath55 95% cl @xmath34 0 15 mev@xmath0 @xmath51 @xmath56 @xmath52 @xmath51 @xmath52 standard focus charm reconstruction techniques clean sample @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 events combining @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 candidates proton no evidence charm pentaquark nakano al leps collaboration 91,012002,2003 ) barmin diana collaboration 66,1715,2003 ) stepanyan clas collaboration 91,252001,2003 ) barth saphir collaboration b572,127,2003 ) asratyan 67,682,2004 )kubarovsky clas collaboration 92,032001,2004 ) airapetian hermes collaboration ( b585,213,2004 ) aleev svd collaboration hep - ex/0401024 abdel - bary cosy - tof collaboration b595,127,2004 ) chekanov zeus collaboration ( b591,7,2004 ). alt na49 collaboration(92,042003,2004 ) aktas h1 collaboration ( b588,17,2004 ) m. link focus collaboration ( a484,174,2002 ) | 0.260293 | 1,647 | 872 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,143 | le thme de larticle est fourni par la conjecture empirique suivante : une hypersurface ferme @xmath0 de diamtre extrieur born et de `` grand '' volume devrait ncessairement tre `` trs '' courbe .
on prend comme mesure pour la courbure le volume recouvert sur la sphre unit @xmath1 par lapplication de gauss , savoir la courbure totale @xmath2 .
notre tude est motive par la preuve de burago @xcite de lingalit @xmath3 pour @xmath4 et @xmath5 .
nous donnons un exemple explicite qui prouve quune ingalit de la forme @xmath6 ne peut tre vraie en toute gnralit en dimension @xmath7 .
nous mettons toutefois en vidence une condition suffisante sur la courbure de ricci sour laquelle lingalit est vrifie en dimension @xmath8 .
le rsultat principal de larticle est une ingalit caractre semi - local qui majore le volume dun compact @xmath9 de @xmath10 par la courbure totale dun ouvert @xmath11 qui le contient , sous lhypothse que la courbure de gauss - kronecker ne sannule pas sur @xmath9 et @xmath11 .
pour @xmath5 on prouve que @xmath12 avec @xmath13 une distance mesure _ sur la sphre @xmath14 _ via lapplication de gauss .
le lieu des points de courbure nulle apparait de cette faon comme une obstruction avoir une ingalit globale comme celle de burago en dimension suprieure .
nous obtenons diffrentes variantes de lingalit ayant un caractre isoprimtrique et nous montrons quelles sont optimales .
au passage , nous obtenons une ingalit isoprimtrique `` inverse '' valable dans les espaces courbure constante . | une immersion isomtrique dhypersurface @xmath15 de classe @xmath16 est localement rigide en dehors du lieu des points de courbure nulle et on sattend ce que les proprits mtriques de @xmath10 dterminent de nombreuses proprits de @xmath17 .
il y a pourtant peu de rsultats quantitatifs qui estiment des caractristiques extrinsques en termes dobjets intrinsques et qui soient valables en toute dimension ( voir @xcite pour plus de rfrences ) .
le rsultat qui est la source du prsent travail est une ingalit de burago @xcite 6.2 _ en dimension @xmath4_. si @xmath18 dsigne la courbure totale de limmersion , @xmath19 est le rayon dune boule contenant @xmath20 et @xmath21 dsigne laire de @xmath10 alors @xmath22 avec galit uniquement pour le plongement isomtrique standard de la sphre de rayon @xmath19 .
nous nous sommes poss la question sil y a un analogue de ( [ burago depart ] ) en dimension suprieure .
la rponse est _ ngative _ pour ce qui est dune ingalit globale du type @xmath23 nanmoins , nous obtenons des ingalits caractre isoprimtrique _ semi - local _ faisant intervenir la courbure totale dun ouvert sur lequel lapplication de gauss est non - dgnre et exhibant le lieu des points de courbure nulle comme une obstruction lexistence dingalits globales .
larticle est structur comme suit .
nous prsentons dans la section [ le contre - exemple ] un exemple explicite qui prouve la non - existence danalogues de ( [ burago depart ] ) en dimension suprieure .
la section [ ineg globales ] dveloppe des formules intgrales concernant les polynmes symtriques des courbures principales et la fonction support de limmersion .
elles gnralisent celles dj obtenues par minkowski et kubota dans le cas convexe @xcite , p.64 et par hsiung @xcite dans le cas non - convexe .
elles sont utilises dune part pour donner des conditions intrinsques suffisantes pour lingalit globale en dimension @xmath24 et dautre part pour raffiner par la suite lingalit semi - locale .
nous obtenons notamment la [ ricci ] soit @xmath25 une immersion isomtrique de classe @xmath16 avec @xmath10 une varit riemannienne lisse compacte sans bord . on suppose que @xmath26 .
si @xmath10 vrifie @xmath27 avec @xmath28 alors @xmath29 il serait bien - sur intressant de trouver des contre - exemples lingalit ( [ desir ] ) satisfaisant @xmath30 .
dans la section [ ineg locales ] nous obtenons des ingalits caractre semi - local . on utilise une mthode destimation a - priori pour les quations de monge - ampre relles dveloppe par rauch et taylor @xcite et reprise par aubin @xcite .
loprateur de type monge - ampre qui apparait naturellement dans notre contexte est @xmath31 agissant sur les fonctions dfinies sur @xmath14 .
ceci suggre une relation - qui nous reste pour linstant cache - avec la thorie spectrale du laplacien sur @xmath14 .
notre rsultat principal est le on suppose que @xmath32 .
soit @xmath33 un ouvert sur lequel lapplication de gauss est non - dgnre .
il existe une constante @xmath34 qui dpend uniquement de la dimension telle que , si @xmath35 est un compact , on ait @xmath36 et @xmath37 o @xmath38 dsigne la courbure totale de @xmath11 et @xmath39 est la distance sphrique locale entre @xmath9 et @xmath40 ( voir la dfinition [ la distance locale ] ) . le terme @xmath39 tend vers zro lorsque @xmath11 approche @xmath9 .
cela fait que lestimation ( [ the best ] ) est dautant meilleure que le compact @xmath9 est situ une grande distance du lieu des points de courbure nulle .
cest dans ce sens quon interprte le lieu des points de courbure nulle comme une obstruction lingalit globale .
lobtention de ( [ the best ] ) partir de ( [ the semi best ] ) laide des formules intgrales globales de type minkowski occupe la section [ local to global ] .
loptimalit de lingalit ( [ the best ] ) est discute dans la section [ loptimalite ] et larticle clt sur une ingalit isoprimtrique inverse traite dans lappendice . _ remerciements .
_ ce travail constitue la premire partie de ma thse .
il a t prpar sous la direction bienveillante et inspire de claude viterbo , qui saura trouver ici lexpression de ma gratitude .
jai profit de remarques , suggestions et patience dcoute de la part de jrme bertrand , charles boubel , emmanuel ferrand , paul gauduchon , taoufik hmidi , jean lannes , christophe margerin , nicolae mihalache , liviu ornea , ferit oztrk , pierre pansu , jean - marc schlenker et costin vlcu .
je leur suis reconnaissant . | immersion isomtrique dhypersurface @xmath15 @xmath16 rigide points courbure nulle proprits mtriques @xmath10 dterminent proprits @xmath17 peu rsultats quantitatifs caractristiques extrinsques valables toute dimension voir @xcite rsultat source travail ingalit burago @xcite 6.2 @xmath4_ @xmath18 courbure totale de limmersion @xmath19 rayon boule @xmath20 @xmath21 laire @xmath10 @xmath22 plongement isomtrique standard sphre rayon @xmath19 analogue de ( [ burago depart ] ) suprieure rponse ngative ingalit globale @xmath23 ingalits isoprimtrique semi - local courbure totale ouvert gauss non - dgnre points courbure nulle obstruction dingalits globales section contre - exemple exemple non - existence danalogues de ( [ burago depart ] ) en dimension suprieure section [ ineg globales ] formules intgrales polynmes symtriques courbures principales fonction support de limmersion obtenues par minkowski kubota cas convexe @xcite p.64 hsiung @xcite non - convexeutilises conditions pour lingalit globale @xmath24 raffiner lingalit semi - locale obtenons ricci @xmath25 immersion isomtrique classe @xmath16 @xmath10 varit riemannienne lisse compacte sans bord suppose @xmath26 @xmath10 vrifie @xmath27 avec @xmath28 @xmath29 trouver contre - exemples lingalit satisfaisant @xmath30 ineg locales obtenons ingalits semi - local mthode destimation a - priori pour quations de monge - ampre loprateur monge - ampre @xmath31 agissant sur fonctions @xmath14 relation avec thorie spectrale du laplacien sur @xmath14 rsultat suppose @xmath32 @xmath33 ouvert lapplication de gauss non - dgnre constante @xmath34 dpend de @xmath35 compact @xmath36 et @xmath37 @xmath38 dsigne courbure totale de @xmath11 @xmath39 distance sphrique locale entre @xmath9 et @xmath40 @xmath39 tend vers zro lorsque @xmath11 approche @xmath9 lestimation meilleure compact @xmath9 grande distance du points courbure nulleinterprte lieu points courbure obstruction lingalit globale lobtention de best ] ) semi best ] formules intgrales globales minkowski section [ local to global ] lingalit section [ loptimalite ] ingalit isoprimtrique inverse lappendice remerciements travail premire partie thse direction claude viterbo gratitude profit de remarques suggestions patience jrme bertrand charles boubel emmanuel ferrand paul gauduchon taoufik hmidi jean lannes christophe margerin nicolae mihalache liviu ornea ferit oztrk pierre pansu jean - marc schlenker costin vlcu reconnaissant | 0.184778 | 1,302 | 712 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,153 | using parametric analysis ( curve fitting ) we find a persistent temperature bump , coincident with world war ( ww2 ) , in eight independent time series , four land- and four ocean - based .
we fit the data with a gaussian on a quadratic background .
six parameters ( constant , linear and quadratic background terms and the amplitude , position and width of the gaussian ) are free to vary .
the mean fitted gaussian amplitude is @xmath0@xmath1c , non - zero by @xmath2 and therefore not accidental .
the area is @xmath3@xmath1cyr .
temperature recovered to baseline rather quickly . rather than coincidence , or systematic measuring error synchronized with ww2 , we conjecture the bump is due to human activity , including the greatly increased combustion ( relative to that era ) of fossil and other fuels .
background surface temperature behavior , a byproduct of our study but largely independent of the ww2 bump , is far more consequential nowadays .
the linear term , @xmath4@xmath1c / century , agrees well with other findings , but the present - day rate of increase , @xmath5@xmath1c / century , is far greater because of the quadratic term .
= 1 * for haim goldberg ( 1939@xmath62017 ) * graphs of global surface temperature versus time often show a @xmath7@xmath1c bump coincident with world war ( ww2 ) .
taken at face value , that is direct evidence of the effect of human activity on global temperature .
( there is ample indirect evidence . )
the bump could test of climate models if the excess combustion during ww2 could be quantified .
here we show only that the bump is real .
it is a persistent feature of the surface temperature record , appearing in eight independent time series , four land- and four ocean - based
. a least - squares fit of a gaussian on a quadratic background to each data set yields values and errors for the constant , linear and quadratic coefficients of the background as well as the magnitude , time of occurrence and duration of the bump . | we download twelve noaa files of temperature anomaly @xcite , half land- and half ocean - based .
each set covers the globe in six 30@xmath1 zones of latitude and lists monthly surface temperature anomalies and variances from 1880 through 2016 , 1644 measurements in all .
we arrange and number them in contiguous zones n@xmath6s , 1@xmath66 for land and 7@xmath612 for ocean .
we fit each zone separately using identical technique ( starting values , convergence test @xmath8 ) and afterwards , find the weighted mean of seven with acceptable fits .
( data for the four polar zones are too sparse and zone 3 is discussed later . ) let @xmath9 , @xmath10 , be the time of the @xmath11 measurement in years and @xmath12 its temperature anomaly in @xmath1c .
the time range 1880@xmath62017 is awkward for a polynomial fit because the coefficients vary by orders of magnitude and have rather obscure meanings : the first coefficient , for instance , is the temperature at year 0 .
therefore , before fitting , we transform @xmath13 to a dimensionless variable @xmath14 ranging from -1 to 1 as @xmath13 ranges from 1880 to 2017 . because 1 to any power is 1 ,
the resulting polynomial coefficients are all of the same order of magnitude and easier to interpret .
for instance , the first coefficient is simply the temperature anomaly at midrange , and @xmath15 at the end of range ( @xmath16 ) is simply the sum of the coefficients .
the transformation and its inverse are @xmath17 where in our case @xmath18 the fit function is @xmath19 with @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22 the gaussian amplitude , mean and @xmath23 respectively
. that form was arrived at after some experimentation ( note unused parameter numbers ) where we found that a three - term ( quadratic ) polynomial was the most the data would support .
the fit improves with more terms , but their error increases sharply , a sure sign of too many adjustable parameters .
we use the standard levenberg - marquardt algorithm to minimize @xmath24 with respect to the six parameters @xmath25 .
the weight @xmath26 of the @xmath11 point is the inverse of the variance @xmath27 given in the noaa tables .
our form of the algorithm , adapted from numerical recipes @xcite allows us ( with negligible effort ) to hold selected parameters fixed at their initial values .
initial values for the gaussian are set by hand in an input file and ( along with all other program constants ) are the same for all 12 data sets to avoid bias .
initial values for the polynomial coefficients are obtained from a preliminary linear least - squares fit without the gaussian .
the usual criterion for a good fit namely @xmath28 is too much to hope for here .
first , non statistical effects are present , for instance the el nio southern oscillation ( enso ) in sveral ocean - based zones .
second , eq.[eqn : csqpdf ] assumes accurate variances , very unlikely in this complicated a problem . the best we achieve for any zone is @xmath29
of course , @xmath30 still tells us whether one fit is better than another .
after convergence , following @xcite , we call marquardt once more with @xmath31 , whereupon the variance in each fitted parameter equals the corresponding diagonal term of the curvature matrix . we deliberately choose conditions to make the program look fairly hard for the @xmath30 minimum : convergence requires @xmath32 improvement in @xmath30 and the initial gaussian amplitude is set at @xmath33 its final value .
the program typically converges in @xmath34 passes , except zone3 which takes 12 passes to get the wrong answer , as we will see .
fitting all twelve zones takes about 1s on an elderly laptop running intel visual fortran .
details , tables and graphs can be found in the long version of this report @xcite . raw land - based ( atmospheric ) data show much more scatter than ocean - based and for both , scatter decreases from poles to equator . weights ( inverse variances ) have the same general pattern , varying by 3@xmath64 orders of magnitude month - to - month at the poles . repeating
the final fit with all @xmath35 shows that our results are insensitive to the weights , but we did use them for the results below .
smoothing the raw data by convolution with a gaussian of @xmath36months reveals distinct ww2 bumps in the peri - equatorial ocean - based zones 9 and 10 , and hints of bumps in some others .
smoothing can be a useful guide to where to look , but by itself leads to no numbers .
after fitting , we studied the gaussian compliance of fit residuals by examining their skewness and kurtosis , both ideally zero , and found some worse than others .
enso , definitely a systematic effect , seems to be quasi random when averaged over many cycles . finally , we replaced the ww2 gaussian by a nearly square pulse also having three free parameters ( amplitude , start and duration ) and found it , too , in all eight zones .
fig.[fig : fitgau10 ] shows the best fit , in zone10 ( zone9 is similar ) .
enso is apparent .
fig.[fig : multiyf ] summarizes all final fits .
left- and right - hand columns are land- and ocean - based respectively , with n at the top .
the ordinate range @xmath37@xmath1c is the same for all panels and the abscissa runs from 1880 through 2016 marked every two decades .
the five zones that missed the final cut are cross - hatched .
all six parameters are free to vary in all zones .
zone3 diverts the three ( gaussian ) degrees of freedom so as to improve the background .
jumping to an unsought nearby minimum of @xmath30 is a common pathology of nonlinear least - squares fits , and one or another zone does this for every set of starting conditions we tried .
fig.[fig : multiyflock ] , however , which is the same fit with the gaussian position and @xmath23 fixed but the amplitude still free to vary , shows that the bump is also present in zone3 with a reasonable amplitude .
space precludes listing fit parameters by zone here ( see @xcite ) but fig.[fig : parms ] shows the trends .
all fits are shown including dropped zones .
error bars are @xmath38 ; note scale factors and a few off - scale points .
starting from the left , the difference between l and o constant terms may result from slightly different definitions of temperature ` anomaly ' .
it has no profound consequences .
more interesting are the next two blocks showing linear and quadratic terms both larger for l than for o. both the rate and the acceleration of surface temperature increase seem to be greater for atmospheric than oceanic measurements .
disequilibrium between the atmosphere and the oceans seems to be increasing with time .
relative errors in those numbers are small except for excluded zone3 .
the gaussian amplitude block confirms the impression ( fig.[fig : multiyf ] ) that the ww2 bump is smaller in land - based measurements , but the final blocks show that the time of occurrence and duration are , within errors , the same .
( we repeat that these were free to vary . )
table[tbl : finalparms ] lists seven - zone weighted means of the fit parameters in two ways : in terms of the scaled time variable @xmath14 used for the fits ( left - hand column ) and in conventional units ( right - hand column ) . to compute the weighted fit for a given year convert to @xmath14 using eq.([eqn : u ] ) and insert values from the left - hand column into eq.([eqn :
f ] ) , or simply read it off the bold line in fig.[fig : predicted ] below .
the final two rows of table[tbl : finalparms ] list two derived quantities , the areas of the weighted gaussian and of the weighted square pulse , in excellent agreement .
because each involves both the amplitude and a measure of duration , their relative errors are larger than in the fitted parameters themselves . since the data do not support a more detailed model of the shape , saying that ww2 was equivalent to a @xmath3@xmath1cyr impulse to global surface temperature is probably the most succinct formulation .
it goes without saying that there are other systematic effects ( enso being the most dramatic ) in the temperature record and there may well be other one - shot events , linked to volcanic eruptions or other phenomena .
we simply have not looked for them here .
fig.[fig : predicted ] encapsulates the present study , showing fitted results for three land - based and four ocean - based time series as well as their weighted average .
we extended it about two decades beyond the present day .
a similar figure in @xcite corresponding to the fits in fig.[fig : multiyflock ] looks cleaner but leads to the same conclusions . according to table[tbl : finalparms ] the amplitude @xmath20 of the ww2 bump differs from zero by @xmath39 . from standard probability tables
the chance of that happening at random is @xmath40 . if we therefore accept that the effect is real , there remain three possibilities .
first , a systematic measuring error might have come and gone coincident with ww2 .
that seems superficially plausible ; after all , ww2 was a time of global upheaval .
however , the systematic aggregation and analysis of surface temperature data cited here did not begin until decades later .
therefore it would have been necessary for a significant fraction of land- and ocean - based stations to change their protocols one way at the beginning of the war and back at the end . the nearest candidate for that
is the well known ` bucket cooling ' effect @xcite .
however , that went in only one direction ( after the war ended ) , it only affected ocean measurements , and ersst.v4 attempts to correct for it @xcite .
second , the bump might be pure coincidence : an unrelated climatic event happened to occur at that time , affecting both land- and ocean - based measurements . logically speaking that argument can never be refuted .
the third possibility is that the ww2 bump was caused by the increase ( enormous relative to that era ) in the combustion of fossil fuels by the world s armies , navies , air forces and factories , let alone the burning of oilfields , cities and the munitions themselves .
indeed , it would seem inconsistent to believe that burning fossil fuels promotes global warming and , simultaneously , that ww2 had no effect .
our study was motivated by curiosity about the ww2 bump , but the background behavior of surface temperature which emerges as a byproduct is of infinitely greater consequence and , mathematically , depends very little on the existence or non - existence of the bump .
the linear coefficient , @xmath41@xmath1c / century ( table[tbl : finalparms ] ) agrees with @xmath42@xmath1c / century from an independent fit to ersst.v4 cited by huang et al . @xcite . also , if in our analysis we omit the the quadratic term and the ww2 bump and simply fit everything with a straight line , the weighted average is @xmath43@xmath1c / century , so that is all consistent .
a positive quadratic coefficient is required by the mere fact that surface temperature exhibited a minimum around 1910 ( as appears in many ocean - based data ) or that it was level from ( say ) 1880@xmath61920 and increased thereafter ( as is more typical of land - based data ) .
all we have done here is to quantify that as objectively as possible .
the positive quadratic coefficient in turn guarantees that the present - day instantaneous rate of change is greater than the long - term average .
unfortunately , looking at fig.[fig : predicted ] , it seems to be far greater : about 2.5@xmath1c / century . in summary ,
the good news is that surface temperature reverted to baseline very quickly after ww2 . in that era at least , surface temperature was stable with respect to small changes .
the bad news is that , because of the quadratic term , the present - day rate of temperature increase is very much larger than the average over the last 137 years .
we thank the harvard university physics department for sustained and generous support . opinions in this report are ours and not those of the university .
david w.j .
thompson , john j. kennedy , john m. wallace and phil d. jones , ` a large discontinuity in the mid - twentieth century in observed global - mean surface temperature , ' nature , * 453 * ( 2008 ) 646 - 649 doi:10.1038/nature06982 .
boyin huang , viva f. banzon , eric freeman , jay lawrimore , wei liu , thomas c. peterson , thomas m. smith , peter w. thorne , scott d. woodruff and huai - min zhang , ` extended reconstructed sea surface temperature version 4 ( ersst.v4 ) .
part i : upgrades and intercomparisons , ' j. climate * 28 * ( 2015 ) 911 - 930 . | download twelve noaa files temperature anomaly @xcite half land half ocean - based each covers globe six 30@xmath1 zones lists monthly surface temperature anomalies variances 1880 through 2016 1644 measurements arrange number zones n@xmath6s 1@xmath66 land 7@xmath612 ocean fit each zone separately technique starting convergence test find weighted mean seven acceptable fits data four polar zones sparse zone 3 discussed later @xmath9 @xmath10 time @xmath11 measurement years @xmath12 temperature anomaly @xmath1c time range 1880@xmath62017 awkward polynomial fit coefficients vary obscure meanings first coefficient temperature year 0 transform @xmath13 dimensionless variable @xmath14 -1 to 1 1880 to 2017 1 power 1 resulting polynomial coefficients same order magnitude easier interpret first coefficient temperature anomaly midrange @xmath15 end sum coefficients transformation inverse @xmath17 fit function @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 gaussian amplitude mean @xmath23 form experimentation three - term quadratic ) polynomial most data supportfit improves more terms error increases too many adjustable parameters levenberg - marquardt algorithm minimize @xmath24 six parameters @xmath25 weight @xmath26 @xmath11 point inverse variance @xmath27 noaa tables algorithm allows hold parameters fixed at initial values values gaussian set hand same for all 12 data sets avoid bias initial values polynomial coefficients obtained from preliminary linear least - fit without gaussian usual criterion good fit @xmath28 too much non statistical effects present el nio southern oscillation in ocean - zones eq.[eqn : csqpdf ] assumes accurate variances unlikely problem best zone is @xmath29 @xmath30 tells one fit better after convergence call marquardt with @xmath31 variance each fitted parameter equals diagonal term curvature matrix conditions program hard for @xmath30 minimum convergence requires @xmath32 improvement @xmath30 initial gaussian amplitude set at @xmath33 final program converges in @xmath34 passes except zone3 takes 12 passes fitting all twelve zones takes 1s on laptop inteldetails tables graphs in report @xcite land - data show more scatter than ocean - based scatter decreases from poles to equator weights by 3@xmath64 orders month - to - month at poles repeating final fit with @xmath35 shows results insensitive to weights for smoothing data with gaussian @xmath36months reveals ww2 bumps in peri - equatorial ocean - zones 9 10 hints bumps in others smoothing leads to no numbers after studied gaussian compliance fit residuals skewness kurtosis some worse quasi random when averaged over cycles replaced ww2 gaussian by square pulse three free parameters found in all eight zones fig shows best fit in zone10 zone9 similar fig. multiyf ] summarizes final fits columns land- ocean - based n at top ordinate range @xmath37@xmath1c same for all panels abscissa runs from 1880 through 2016 every two decades five zones missed final cut cross - hatched six parameters free to vary in all zones zone3 diverts three degrees freedom to improve backgroundjumping to minimum @xmath30 common pathology nonlinear least - squares fits zone for every starting conditions fig. same fit with gaussian position @xmath23 fixed amplitude to vary shows bump present in zone3 reasonable amplitude space precludes fit parameters by zone fig. shows trends all fits shown including dropped zones error bars are @xmath38 scale factors off - scale points difference between l and o constant terms from different definitions temperature anomaly no profound consequences next two blocks showing linear quadratic terms larger for l than o rate acceleration surface temperature increase greater for atmospheric than oceanic measurements disequilibrium between atmosphere oceans increasing with time relative errors small except zone3 gaussian amplitude block confirms impression ww2 bump smaller in land - based measurements final blocks show time of occurrence duration same free to vary table finalparms ] lists seven - zone weighted means fit parameters scaled time variable @xmath14 conventional units to compute weighted fit year convert to @xmath14 using eq. insert values from into eq.([eqn : f ] ) read bold line in fig. predicted ] below final two rows of table list two derived quantities weighted gaussian weighted square pulse agreement each involves amplitude duration relative errors larger than fitted parameters data support detailed model shape ww2 equivalent to @xmath3@xmath1cyr impulse to global surface temperature succinct other systematic effects dramatic in temperature record one - shot events linked to volcanic eruptions not looked for here fig. predicted ] encapsulates present study fitted results for three land four ocean - based time series weighted average extended two decades beyond present day similar figure in @xcite fig. multiyflock ] looks cleaner leads to same conclusions table amplitude @xmath20 of ww2 bump differs from zero by @xmath39 chance of at random is @xmath40 accept effect real three possibilities systematic measuring error might with ww2 ww2 global upheaval systematic aggregation analysis of surface temperature data begin decades later necessary for fraction of land- ocean - based stations to change protocols at beginning war endnearest candidate is ` bucket cooling ' effect @xcite one direction after war affected ocean measurements ersst.v4 attempts to correct bump might be coincidence : unrelated climatic event affecting land and ocean - measurements argument can be refuted third possibility is ww2 bump caused by increase in combustion of fossil fuels by armies navies air forces factories burning oilfields cities munitions inconsistent to believe burning fossil fuels promotes global warming ww2 had no effect study motivated by curiosity about ww2 bump background behavior of surface temperature greater consequence depends little on existence bump linear coefficient @xmath41@xmath1c / century agrees with @xmath42@xmath1c / century fit to ersst.v4 cited by huang et al if omit quadratic term ww2 bump fit everything with straight line weighted average is @xmath43@xmath1c / century consistent positive quadratic coefficient required by surface temperature exhibited minimum around 1910 ocean - data or level from 1880 increased thereafter land - based data quantify as objectively possiblepositive quadratic coefficient guarantees present - day instantaneous rate change greater than long - term average fig greater about 2.5@xmath1c / century surface temperature reverted to baseline quickly after ww2 stable small changes quadratic term present - day temperature increase larger than average last 137 years thank harvard university physics department support opinions ours not university david thompson john kennedy wallace phil d jones large discontinuity mid - twentieth century in global - mean surface temperature nature 453 2008 ) 646 - 649 boyin huang viva banzon eric freeman jay lawrimore wei liu thomas peterson smith peter thorne scott woodruff huai - min zhang extended reconstructed sea surface temperature version 4 upgrades intercomparisons climate 28 2015 ) 911 - 930 | 0.440262 | 2,861 | 1,429 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,155 | we use the overlap formalism to define a topological index on the lattice .
we study the spectral flow of the hermitian wilson - dirac operator and identify zero crossings with topological objects .
we determine the topological susceptibility and zero mode size distribution , and we comment on the stability of our results .
# 1to 0pt#1 3@xmath0 # 1*[#1 ] * | in this proceedings , we summarize our work on the determination of the topological susceptibility and zero mode size distribution of @xmath1 and @xmath0 gauge fields using the overlap formalism . most of this work has appeared in print @xcite .
we will focus here on new results which are extensions of the published work , namely the topological susceptibility for @xmath1 pure gauge theory , the zero mode size distribution for both @xmath1 and @xmath0 , and the density of zero eigenvalues @xmath2 for @xmath1 and @xmath0 .
a more detailed discussion of the role of the zero eigenvalue density can be found in the proceedings of the plenary talk given by narayanan @xcite .
the overlap formalism for constructing a chiral gauge theory on the lattice @xcite provides a natural definition of the index , @xmath3 , of the associated chiral dirac operator .
the index is equal to half the difference of negative and positive eigenvalues of the hermitian wilson - dirac operator @xmath4 where @xmath5 is the usual wilson
dirac operator ( we will use negative sign for the mass term throughout ) . on the lattice , because of the additive mass renormalization , the crossings of zero occur at positive @xmath6 and spread out in @xmath6 .
it is easy to see , that no eigenvalues of @xmath7 can be zero for @xmath8 . since in the free case the first doublers become massless at @xmath9
we restrict ourselves to @xmath10 . a simple way to compute the index @xmath3 is to compute the lowest eigenvalues of @xmath7 at some suitably small @xmath6 before any crossings of zero occurred .
then @xmath6 is slowly varied and the number and direction of zero crossings are tracked .
the net number at some @xmath11 is the index of the overlap chiral dirac operator .
we have applied this procedure to compute the index , which we take as the definition of topological charge on the lattice , of various gauge field ensembles with gauge group su(3 ) including pure gauge , symanzik improved pure gauge , and two dynamical flavor generated gauge fields @xcite , and recently pure gauge su(2 ) .
we found that the zero crossings start occurring at some , ensemble dependent , @xmath12 and continue occurring for all @xmath6 in @xmath13 in sufficiently large lattice volumes .
hence , the spectral gap is closed in the entire range . to further investigate the zero level crossings , we compute the density of zero eigenvalues @xmath14 for @xmath7 by fitting the integrated density @xmath15 to a line through the origin for some cutoff @xmath16 . by studying the scaling of @xmath14 for quenched @xmath0
, we conclude that the density of zero eigenvalues falls exponentially in the inverse lattice spacing and only vanishes in the continuum limit ( see figure 6 of narayanan s talk @xcite ) .
we will observe latter that these zeros are due to small localized modes .
more discussion can be found in the talk of narayanan @xcite .
using the index of the chiral dirac operator as our ( fermionic ) definition of the topological charge of the gauge field background , we obtain the topological susceptibility @xmath17 as a function of @xmath11 .
all of the gauge ensembles studied have the general characteristic that the susceptibility rises sharply in the region where @xmath14 is peaked , and then it essentially flattens out in the region where @xmath14 is small @xcite .
we define a size of the eigenvector associated with the level crossing zero mode @xmath18 motivated by the thooft zero mode @xmath19 where @xmath20 are the eigenvectors of @xmath21 .
another definition based on the second moment of @xmath22 was used in ref .
we should emphasize that we look only at the sizes of eigenmodes that cross , and only close to the crossing point . only then
can we expect to get a good estimate of the localization size inspired by the t hooft zero mode .
we show in figure [ b6.0_all ] a detailed study of the @xmath23 , @xmath24 pure gauge ensemble . on the first line
is shown the density of zero eigenvalues @xmath14 and the number of crossings in each mass bin .
since there are a nonzero number of crossings , we see that @xmath14 does indeed measure zero eigenvalues , and not just small eigenvalues near zero .
we also see that @xmath14 rises sharply in @xmath6 , then falls to a nonzero value where there is a small number of zero level crossings . on the second line of figure [ b6.0_all ]
, we show the size of the zero modes @xmath25 .
the modes are large near @xmath26 where @xmath14 is large , then @xmath27 drops to about @xmath28 or @xmath29 lattice spacings up to @xmath9 .
we see that the corresponding @xmath17 rises sharply when @xmath27 is large for @xmath6 near @xmath26 , then is quite stable when @xmath27 is small .
this result show that while the index , @xmath3 , of the field is @xmath6 dependent , @xmath17 ( a physical quantity ) is independent of the contribution from the small modes for @xmath30 . to further clarify the relative contribution of the zero modes , in the last line of figure [ b6.0_all ] the zero mode size distribution
is shown which peaks for @xmath31 . in the adjacent graph ,
@xmath17 , here defined by the contribution of zero modes of size @xmath27 and larger , is stable when @xmath31 .
hence , the small modes do not affect the estimate of @xmath17 .
our estimates of @xmath17 are shown in table [ tab : results ] where we use the string tension value @xmath32(mev ) to set the scale .
our results are in rough agreement with other groups @xcite .
in figure [ dn_all ] we plot the zero mode size distribution for several @xmath33 s for @xmath0 and @xmath1 which is of interest for the instanton liquid model .
we find the distributions always peaks for sizes about @xmath28 - @xmath29 lattice spacings . for @xmath0 , we see small secondary peaks at @xmath34fm for @xmath23 and @xmath35 .
however , there is only a shoulder for @xmath36 at @xmath37fm . for @xmath1 which are all the same lattice size , we find the secondary peaks shift to smaller @xmath27 for increasing @xmath33 .
these secondary peaks do not occur at any general physical radius and are consistent with a finite volume effect .
edwards , u.m heller , r. narayanan , r.l .
singleton , jr .
phys . b518
( 1998 ) 319336 ; r.g .
edwards , u.m .
heller and r. narayanan , nucl . phys . b522 ( 1998 ) 285300 ; hep - lat/9802016 , to appear in nucl .
b ; hep - lat/9806011 , to appear in phys . lett . b. | proceedings summarize work topological susceptibility zero mode size distribution of @xmath1 @xmath0 gauge fields using overlap formalism work appeared print focus on new results topological susceptibility @xmath1 zero mode size distribution density of zero eigenvalues @xmath2 detailed discussion zero eigenvalue density proceedings plenary talk narayanan overlap formalism chiral gauge theory lattice provides definition index @xmath3 chiral dirac operator index equal to half difference of negative positive eigenvalues of hermitian wilson - dirac operator @xmath4 @xmath5 usual wilson dirac operator additive mass renormalization crossings of zero occur at positive @xmath6 spread in @xmath6 no eigenvalues of @xmath7 zero for @xmath8 first doublers massless at @xmath9 restrict to @xmath10 compute index @xmath3 lowest eigenvalues of @xmath7 @xmath6 before crossings zero @xmath6 varied number direction zero crossings tracked net number at @xmath11 is index of overlap chiral dirac operatorapplied procedure compute index definition topological charge lattice gauge field ensembles gauge group su(3 ) pure gauge symanzik improved gauge dynamical flavor generated gauge fields @xcite pure gauge su(2 ) zero crossings @xmath12 continue @xmath6 in @xmath13 large lattice volumes spectral gap closed entire range investigate zero crossings compute density zero eigenvalues @xmath14 for @xmath7 fitting integrated density @xmath15 line origin cutoff @xmath16 scaling @xmath14 @xmath0 density zero eigenvalues falls in inverse lattice spacing vanishes in continuum limit figure 6 talk zeros due to small localized modes discussion talk using index chiral dirac operator definition topological charge gauge field background obtain topological susceptibility @xmath17 function of @xmath11 gauge ensembles susceptibility rises region @xmath14 peaked flattens @xmath14 small @xcite define size eigenvector level crossing zero mode @xmath18 motivated by zero mode @xmath19 @xmath20 eigenvectors @xmath21 definition second moment @xmath22 used in ref emphasize look at sizes eigenmodes cross close to crossing point good estimate localization size inspired t hooft zero mode figure [ b6.0 detailed study @xmath23 @xmath24 pure gauge ensemble first line density of zero eigenvalues @xmath14 number crossings in each mass bin nonzero number crossings @xmath14 zero eigenvalues not small near zero @xmath14 rises in @xmath6 falls to nonzero small zero level crossings second line size of zero modes @xmath25 modes large near @xmath26 @xmath27 drops to @xmath28 or @xmath29 to @xmath9 @xmath17 rises when @xmath27 large @xmath6 near @xmath26 stable when @xmath27 small index @xmath3 field @xmath6 dependent @xmath17 independent of contribution small modes for @xmath30 relative contribution zero modes last line figure zero mode size distribution peaks for @xmath31 @xmath17 defined contribution zero modes size @xmath27 larger stable when @xmath31 small modes not affect estimate @xmath17estimates @xmath17 shown table results string tension value @xmath32(mev ) scale results with groups @xcite figure zero mode size distribution @xmath33 @xmath0 @xmath1 interest instanton liquid model distributions peaks @xmath28 - @xmath29 lattice spacings @xmath0 small secondary peaks at @xmath34fm @xmath23 @xmath35 shoulder @xmath36 @xmath37fm @xmath1 same lattice size secondary peaks shift to @xmath27 @xmath33 secondary peaks general physical radius consistent with finite volume effect edwards , heller r narayanan singleton . b518 ( 1998 ) 319336 ; phys . b522 ( 1998 ) 285300 hep - lat/9802016 nucl hep - lat/9806011 phys . | 0.265012 | 1,617 | 847 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,181 | we present spectrally resolved _ herschel_/hifi observations of the young multiple system t tau in atomic and molecular lines . while co , h@xmath0o , [ ] , and so lines trace the envelope and the outflowing gas up to velocities of 33 kms@xmath1 with respect to systemic , the cn 54 hyperfine structure lines at 566.7 , 566.9 ghz show a narrow double - peaked profile centered at systemic velocity , consistent with an origin in the outer region of the compact disk of t tau n. disk modeling of the t tau n disk with the thermo - chemical code prodimo produces cn line fluxes and profiles consistent with the observed ones and constrain the size of the gaseous disk ( @xmath2 au ) and its inclination ( @xmath3@xmath4 ) .
the model indicates that the cn lines originate in a disk upper layer at 40110 au from the star , which is irradiated by the stellar uv field and heated up to temperatures of @xmath5 k. with respect to previously observed cn 21 millimeter lines , the cn 54 lines appear to be less affected by envelope emission , due to their larger critical density and excitation temperature .
hence , high - j cn lines are a unique confusion - free tracer of embedded disks , such as the disk of t tau n. | [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] ( au ) , and inclination , @xmath6 ( ) , for the cn 54 j=9/27/2 and j=11/29/2 lines ( top and bottom panel , respectively ) .
the peak separation versus the line flux is indicated by filled points and solid lines connecting the model predictions for the same @xmath7 .
the fwhm versus the line flux is overplotted with empty circles and dotted lines.,width=332 ] ( @xmath8 ) , the dotted black and blue curves the gas temperature and total hydrogen number density @xmath9.,width=332 ] in order to test if the cn lines originate in the disk of t tau n we use a parametrized disk model calculated with the thermo - chemical disk modeling code prodimo @xcite .
we adopt stellar and disk parameters as inferred from previous studies , which well reproduce the source spectral energy distribution ( sed ) ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
we use stellar spectral type k0 ( @xmath10 k ) , stellar luminosity @xmath11 @xmath12 and stellar mass @xmath13 @xmath14 as determined by @xcite .
the uv spectrum @xcite is reproduced by an uv excess @xmath15 and a power law slope @xmath16 .
the effect of x - ray radiation from the stellar corona of t tau n ( @xmath17 ergs@xmath1 , @xcite ) is taken into account following @xcite and @xcite .
following @xcite we assume a disk inner radius @xmath18 au , a dust mixture of astronomical silicates @xcite and amorphous carbon @xcite with relative abundances of 62.5% and 37.5% , and a grain size distribution @xmath19 with @xmath20 , where @xmath21 is the number of dust particles with radius @xmath22 , and the minimum / maximum grain size are @xmath23 @xmath24 m and @xmath25 mm .
this implies a dust mass of @xmath26 @xmath14 to reproduce the observed mm emission @xcite . using the average ism dust - to - gas ratio of @xmath27 ,
the gas mass is 0.013 @xmath14 .
the dust - to - gas ratio can be different from the ism value in evolved disks ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
however , as the cn lines are optically thick in the disk , their flux is independent on the gas mass , hence on the assumed dust - to - gas ratio .
the sed is well reproduced by assuming a disk surface density @xmath28 and scale height @xmath29 @xcite . to obtain a dust distribution similar to the two - layers model adopted by @xcite
, we assume that grains larger than @xmath30 @xmath24 m have settled to a smaller scale height than the gas , @xmath31 , with @xmath32 . as pah emission is generally not detected in ttss ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) , the pah fraction , @xmath33 , is set to @xmath27 with respect to the ism abundance of @xmath34 pah particles / h - nucleus .
lower values , @xmath35 , do not affect the cn emission .
the adopted stellar and disk parameters are summarized in table [ tab : model_par ] .
as the cn line fluxes and profiles are very sensitive to the assumed disk outer radius , @xmath7 , and inclination , @xmath6 , we proceed through two steps .
first , we run a grid of models at low resolution ( 50@xmath3650 grid points ) adopting @xmath7 and @xmath6 values which cover the range of estimates from previous studies ( @xmath37 au , @xmath38 au , @xcite ) .
then , we run a high resolution model ( 100@xmath36100 grid points ) for @xmath7 and @xmath6 which best fit the observations , to better resolve the chemical and temperature gradients and the vertical extent of the line forming region in the disk .
the predicted fwhm and peak separation do not depend on the model resolution while the line fluxes are lower by up to @xmath39% when increasing the resolution .
the line profiles and fluxes are obtained by first solving the statistical equilibrium with 2d escape probability to obtain the level populations , and then using 2d ray - tracing . as the three brightest lines of each cn 54 j
j transition are blended and the three undetected components are more than one order of magnitude fainter , the model computes the sum of the cn 54 j=9/27/2 and j=11/29/2 lines .
the results obtained for the grid of models ( figure [ fig : grid ] ) show that the cn line fluxes depend mainly on the disk size and increase for increasing outer radii .
this is due to the fact that , as suggested by their profiles , the cn lines originate from the outer region of the disk .
the best fit of the cn line fluxes is obtained for @xmath40 au . however , as model - predicted fluxes are affected by @xmath39% uncertainty , values of @xmath7 between @xmath41 au produce cn line fluxes which are still in agreement with the observations .
the ratio between the 566.9 and the 566.7 ghz lines predicted by the models , @xmath42 , is slightly lower but still in agreement with the observed one ( @xmath43 ) .
the peak separation and fwhm predicted by the models depend on both @xmath7 and @xmath6 . for @xmath44 au the observed @xmath45 and fwhm are reproduced if the disk inclination is low ( @xmath46 ) .
this is in agreement with the conclusions by @xcite and @xcite based on the modeling of the sed and near- , mid - infrared visibilities .
larger inclination angles of @xmath47 @xcite are excluded based on the observed cn profiles . following the results obtained from the grid of models we adopt @xmath48 au , @xmath3 and compute the fluxes and profiles of all the lines covered by our observations using the high resolution model .
figure [ fig : cn_model ] shows the region in the disk where 50% of the cn n=54 j=9/27/2 and j=11/29/2 lines originate according to our model .
this is obtained using vertical escape probability and without accounting for disk inclination .
the model indicates that the cn lines are excited in a disk upper layer located at 40110 au distance from the star , which is irradiated by the stellar uv field .
this heats the gas up to temperatures of @xmath49 k , while the gas density is @xmath50 @xmath8 , thus the cn lines are almost thermalized and optically thick ( @xmath51 ) in the line emitting region .
in this disk layer , cn is produced by h + cn@xmath52 , and c + no reactions , and photo - dissociation of hcn , while the main destruction route is photo - dissociation of cn . in figure [ fig : hifi_lines ] and table [ tab : lines ] the model - predicted line profiles and fluxes are compared with the observed ones . for cn lines , the model predicts a fwhm of 3.9 kms@xmath1 and peak separation of 2.6 kms@xmath1 , in agreement with observations ( fwhm@xmath53 kms@xmath1 , @xmath54 kms@xmath1 ) .
also the line fluxes agree with observations within a factor @xmath55 .
the sum of the fluxes of the n=21 components , instead , is about an order of magnitude lower than what observed by @xcite , who suggest that the line is dominated by envelope emission .
the co , @xmath56co , h@xmath0o , and so line fluxes predicted by the disk model are from a factor four to two orders of magnitude smaller than observed , as well as for the high - j co , h@xmath0o , oh , and atomic [ ] , [ ] lines previously observed with pacs ( see table 4 by @xcite ) .
this is a further evidence that these lines are dominated by envelope and outflow emission , as already suggested by the fact that [ ] , [ ] emission is spatially extended with pacs ( @xmath57 ) and by the broad profiles of co , h@xmath0o , so , and [ ] obtained with hifi .
the _ herschel_/hifi observations of the t tau system show emission in a number of molecular and atomic lines .
the origin of the emission lines in embedded , accreting / ejecting sources is highly debated , being crucial to identify a tracer to dig out the faint disk emission ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
in the case of t tau , the co , h@xmath0o , and [ ] lines clearly trace high - velocity outflowing gas .
by contrast with those lines and with previously observed cn 21 lines @xcite , the cn 54 lines show narrow double - peaked profiles centered at the systemic velocity , suggesting an origin in the outer disk of t tau n. disk modeling predicts cn line fluxes and profiles in agreement with observed ones and constrains the size of the gaseous disk of t tau n ( @xmath2 au ) and its inclination ( @xmath3@xmath4 ) .
this study demonstrates that high - j cn lines are a unique tool to probe the gaseous disk of strongly accreting / ejecting sources and paves the way for future observations of embedded disks with alma . | cols="^,^ inclination @xmath6 cn 54 j=9/27/2 j=11/29/2 lines top bottom panel peak separation versus line flux filled points solid lines connecting model predictions @xmath7 fwhm versus line flux overplotted empty circles dotted lines=332 @xmath8 ) dotted black blue curves gas temperature total hydrogen density @xmath9. test cn lines originate disk t tau n parametrized disk model thermo - chemical disk modeling code prodimo @xcite adopt stellar disk parameters previous studies reproduce source spectral energy distribution stellar spectral type k0 stellar luminosity stellar mass @xcite uv spectrum uv excess @xmath15 power law slope @xmath16 effect x - ray radiation stellar corona t tau n disk inner radius @xmath18 dust mixture astronomical silicates amorphous carbon relative abundances 62.5% 37.5% grain size distribution @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 number dust particles radius @xmath22 minimum maximum grain size @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 mmimplies dust mass @xmath26 @xmath14 reproduce observed mm emission average dust - to - gas ratio @xmath27 gas mass 0.013 @xmath14 dust - to - gas ratio different ism value evolved disks cn lines thick disk flux independent gas mass assumed dust - to - gas ratio reproduced assuming disk surface density @xmath28 scale height @xmath29 dust distribution two - layers model grains larger @xmath30 @xmath24 m settled smaller scale height gas @xmath31 @xmath32 pah emission not detected ttss pah fraction @xmath33 set @xmath27 ism abundance @xmath34 pah particles nucleus lower values @xmath35 affect cn emission adopted stellar disk parameters summarized in table [ model_par ] cn line fluxes profiles sensitive to disk outer radius @xmath7 inclination @xmath6 proceed two steps run grid models low resolution points adopting @xmath7 @xmath6 values cover estimates previous studiesrun high resolution model 100@xmath36100 grid points for @xmath7 @xmath6 observations chemical temperature gradients vertical extent line forming region predicted fwhm peak separation depend on model resolution line fluxes lower @xmath39% increasing resolution line profiles fluxes obtained by solving statistical equilibrium with 2d escape probability 2d ray - tracing three brightest lines cn 54 j transition blended undetected components fainter model computes sum cn 54 j=9/27/2 j=11/29/2 lines results show cn line fluxes depend on disk size increase for increasing outer radii lines originate from outer region disk best fit line fluxes for @xmath40 au model - predicted fluxes affected by @xmath39% uncertainty @xmath7 @xmath41 au produce cn line fluxes agreement with observations ratio between 566.9 566.7 ghz lines predicted @xmath42 slightly lower agreement with observed peak separation fwhm depend on @xmath7 @xmath6 @xmath44 observed @xmath45 fwhm reproduced if disk inclination low agreement with conclusions @xcite modeling sed near mid - infrared visibilitiesinclination angles @xmath47 @xcite excluded observed cn profiles adopt @xmath48 @xmath3 compute fluxes profiles lines high resolution model figure cn shows region where 50% cn n=54 j=9/27/2 j=11/29/2 lines originate obtained using vertical escape probability disk inclination cn lines excited disk upper layer 40110 au distance from star irradiated by stellar uv field heats gas temperatures @xmath49 k gas density @xmath50 @xmath8 cn lines almost thermalized optically thick @xmath51 ) in line emitting region cn produced by h + cn@xmath52 c + no reactions photo - dissociation hcn main destruction route photo - dissociation cn figure_lines model - predicted line profiles fluxes compared with observed cn lines model predicts fwhm 3.9 kms@xmath1 peak separation 2.6 kms@xmath1 with observations line fluxes agree with observations within factor @xmath55 sum fluxes n=21 components lower than @xcite line dominated envelope emissionco h@xmath0o so line fluxes predicted by disk model four to two smaller than observed high - j co h@xmath0o oh atomic [ ] lines observed with pacs lines dominated by envelope outflow emission [ ] emission spatially extended with pacs broad profiles of co h@xmath0o so [ ] with hifi herschel_/hifi observations t tau system show emission in molecular atomic lines origin emission lines embedded sources debated crucial to identify tracer faint disk emission co h@xmath0o [ ] lines trace high - velocity outflowing gas cn 21 cn 54 lines show narrow double - peaked profiles systemic velocity suggesting origin in outer disk of t tau n disk modeling predicts cn line fluxes profiles constrains size gaseous disk of t tau n inclination study demonstrates high - j cn lines unique tool probe gaseous disk accreting ejecting sources paves for future observations of embedded disks with alma | 0.319171 | 2,158 | 1,082 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,228 | fortran 77 programs for the computation of modified bessel functions of purely imaginary order are presented .
the codes compute the functions @xmath0 , @xmath1 and their derivatives for real @xmath2 and positive @xmath3 ; these functions are independent solutions of the differential equation @xmath4 .
the code also computes exponentially scaled functions .
the range of computation is @xmath5\times [ -1500,1500]$ ] when scaled functions are considered and it is larger than @xmath6\times [ -400,400]$ ] for standard ieee double precision arithmetic .
the relative accuracy is better than @xmath7 in the range @xmath8\times [ -200,200]$ ] and close to @xmath9 in @xmath10\times [ -1500,1500]$ ] . | these routines compute the functions @xmath0 and @xmath1 , which constitute a numerically satisfactory pair of independent solutions of the modified bessel equation of imaginary order : @xmath11 the routine dkia computes @xmath0 and its derivative .
dlia computes @xmath1 and its derivative .
both routines require that a method for computing airy functions of real variable is available .
the routines use algorithm 819 @xcite .
the algorithm combines different methods of evaluation in different regions .
comparison between the different methods ( see accompanying paper @xcite ) , together with the use of the wronskian relation , has been used to determine the accuracy of the algorithm ( see section [ sec2 ] ) .
the algorithm computes either the functions @xmath0 , @xmath1 and their derivatives or scaled functions which can be used in larger regions than the unscaled functions .
the scaled functions are defined in the accompanying paper @xcite ( section 3 , eqs .
( 43 ) and ( 44 ) ) and in the comment lines of the algorithms .
the relative accuracy of the algorithms is ( except close to the zeros of the functions ) better than @xmath7 in the @xmath12-region @xmath13 \times [ -200,200]$ ] , better than @xmath14 in @xmath15 \times [ -500,500]$ ] and close to @xmath9 in @xmath16 \times [ -1500,1500]$ ] . both scaled and unscaled functions can be computed in @xmath17 but only scaled functions can be evaluated in the whole domains @xmath18 and @xmath19 without causing overflows / underflows for typical ieee machines .
see the accompanying paper @xcite , section 3 .
because the scaled and unscaled functions are even functions of @xmath2 , we can restrict the study to @xmath20 . in order to determine the region of applicability of each method ,
we have compared all the methods available with the non - oscillating integral representations in the accompanying paper @xcite , section 2.4 , which are expected to be valid in all the @xmath12 plane except close to @xmath21 .
this is so because , as explained in @xcite , the integration paths become increasingly non - smooth as one approaches the transition line @xmath21 ( in this region , the uniform asymptotic expansions in the accompanying paper , section 2.3 , are the best option ) .
the remaining approaches have little or no overlap in their regions of validity , except for the continued fraction method for the computation of @xmath0 and @xmath22 and the asymptotic expansions for large @xmath3 ; in fact , the validity region of the cf - method completely covers that of the asymptotic expansion ; therefore , the cf method is preferred over the asymptotic expansion for large @xmath3 for the computation of @xmath0 and its derivative .
as we will next describe , for not too large values of @xmath2 and @xmath3 there are at least two alternative methods of computation in any region of the @xmath12 plane .
this is important in order to determine the accuracy reachable by the algorithm .
a second validation of the methods is provided by the wronskian relation @xmath23 which is also satisfied by the scaled functions @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 . of course
, when two different approaches are available within a given accuracy in a same region , we choose the fastest method of computation . by order of speed , from fastest to slowest we can list the different methods of computation described in @xcite as follows : 1 .
series expansions and continued fraction method .
2 . asymptotic expansions .
integral representations .
figures 1,2 show the regions in the plane @xmath12 where the different methods are used in the routines dkia and dlia , respectively . in the first comment lines of the codes ,
the explicit equations for the curves separating the different regions are given .
* figure 2 .
* regions of applicability of each method for the @xmath1 , @xmath28 functions . *
uae * : uniform airy - type asymptotic expansion ; * i * : integral representations ; * s * : power series ; * cf * : for continued fraction and * ae * : asymptotic expansions . both the direct comparison with integral representations as well as the wronskian check show that the unscaled and scaled functions can be computed with an accuracy better than @xmath7 in the region @xmath29\times [ 0,200]$ ] without using integral representations .
this accuracy was found to be in a good compromise with efficiency .
we expect that function values outside this range will not be needed very often .
as the range considered is increased , the accuracy decreases mildly , being better than @xmath30 in @xmath6 \times [ 0,500]$ ] and close to @xmath9 in the full range of computation @xmath10\times [ 0,1500]$ ] . of course , near the zeros of the functions
( there are infinitely many of them in the oscillatory region @xmath31 ) relative accuracy loses meaning and only absolute accuracy makes sense .
figure 3 shows the cpu time spent by the code in the regions @xmath32\times [ 0,l]$ ] ; these cpu times refer to a pentium - ii 350-mhz processor running under debian - linux ; the compiler used was the gnu fortran compiler g77 .
* figure 3 . * cpu times in @xmath33\times [ 0,l]$ ] as a function of @xmath34 .
it is apparent from the figure that different methods with different speeds appear as @xmath34 grows . for small @xmath34 , only series ( and the cf method for @xmath35 )
are needed , which are the fastest methods .
as soon as asymptotic expansions come into play the cpu times tend to increase more rapidly . for @xmath34 larger than @xmath36 the effect of
the use of quadratures becomes prominent .
tables 1 and 2 show the average time spent by each method of computation in microseconds , both for dkia and dlia routines . also , the percentage of use of each method is shown .
these data are shown for two different regions of computation : the `` @xmath7 accuracy region '' ( @xmath8\times [ 0,200]$ ] ) ( table 1 ) and the full range permitted by the routines ( @xmath10\times [ 0,1500]$ ] ) ( table 2 ) .
@xmath37 * table 1 . *
percentage of use and average cpu times of each method in the region @xmath8\times [ 0,200]$ ] .
@xmath38 * table 2 . *
percentage of use and average cpu times of each method in the region @xmath10\times [ 0,1500]$ ] .
the algorithm has been tested in several computers and operating systems ( pentium ii pc under debian linux , pentium iv laptop under windows xp , pentium iv pc under windows xp and red hat linux and solaris 8 workstation ) and several compilers ( g77 and f77 for linux and windows , digital fortan and lahey fortran for windows and the sun fortran 95 ) .
in spite of the many applications of the modified bessel functions of imaginary order , the only previously published algorithm , as far as the authors know , is the code by thompson and barnett @xcite ( tb algorithm from now on ) . this code is intended for the computation of coulomb wave functions of complex order and arguments , which have as a subset modified bessel functions of complex orders .
it is not surprising that , as we later discuss , the tb algorithm has limitations when computing the @xmath0 and @xmath1 functions : this is a more general algorithm than ours and it was specially designed for real parameters , although it can be applied for complex parameters too . apart from this code , there are no available algorithms in the public domain , as can be judged by browsing at gams ( guide to available mathematical software : http://gams.nist.org ) , which are able to compute @xmath0 , @xmath1 and their derivatives .
as figure 4 shows , the tb algorithm ( program coulcc available from cpc library ) is inaccurate for imaginary orders and suffers from overflow and convergence problems .
we have tested the program coulcc @xcite against our algorithms .
figure 4 shows the comparison . at the lighter points the flag for detecting errors in coulcc was different from zero , showing that the algorithm failed to converge or suffered overflows .
the rest of points show discrepancies with our code , which persist for @xmath39 accuracy and lower .
of course , at the lighter points all the accuracy is lost and the problems persist for larger values of @xmath3 and @xmath2 .
* figure 4 .
* regions where the tb algorithm fails due to poor convergence or overflows ( light shaded points ) and points where accuracy is lost ( dark shaded points ) .
the discrepancy is greater than @xmath39 in the left figure and greater than @xmath7 in the right figure .
therefore , our algorithm seems to be the first accurate and efficient code which is capable of computing modified bessel functions of imaginary order with an accuracy close to full double precision in a wide domain .
99 a. gil , j. segura , n.m .
computing solutions of the modified bessel differential equation for imaginary orders and positive arguments .
acm trans . math . soft .
( submitted for publication in this same issue ) . | routines compute functions @xmath0 and @xmath1 satisfactory independent solutions of modified bessel equation imaginary order : @xmath11 dkia computes @xmath0 derivative dlia computes @xmath1 derivative routines require method for computing airy functions of real variable use algorithm 819 @xcite algorithm combines methods evaluation in regions comparison wronskian relation accuracy algorithm algorithm computes functions @xmath0 @xmath1 derivatives or scaled functions in larger regions scaled functions defined in paper @xcite section 3 eqs 43 44 comment lines of algorithms relative accuracy algorithms better than @xmath7 in @xmath12 @xmath14 in @xmath15 close to @xmath9 @xmath16 scaled and unscaled functions computed in @xmath17 only scaled functions evaluated in domains @xmath18 and @xmath19 without overflows / underflows for machines paper @xcite section 3 scaled and unscaled functions are even functions of @xmath2 restrict study to @xmath20determine region applicability method compared methods with non - oscillating integral representations in paper @xcite section 2.4 valid in @xmath12 plane except @xmath21 integration paths non - smooth transition line @xmath21 uniform asymptotic expansions in paper section 2.3 best remaining approaches little no overlap in regions validity except continued method @xmath0 @xmath22 asymptotic expansions for large @xmath3 validity region cf - method covers asymptotic expansion cf method preferred over asymptotic expansion for large @xmath3 @xmath0 for not large values of @xmath2 and @xmath3 two alternative methods computation in any region @xmath12 plane important determine accuracy algorithm second validation by wronskian relation @xmath23 satisfied by scaled functions @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 two approaches choose fastest method order speed methods @xcite 1 series expansions continued fraction method 2 asymptotic expansions . integral representations figures 1,2 show regions in plane @xmath12 where different methods used in routines dkia and dlia first comment lines codes equations curves separating regions given figure 2 regions applicability method @xmath1 @xmath28 functions uae uniform airy - type asymptotic expansion i integral representations s power series cf continued fraction ae asymptotic expansions comparison integral representations wronskian check show unscaled scaled functions computed better @xmath7 region @xmath29\times [ 0,200]$ without integral representations accuracy compromise efficiency function values outside range not needed often range increased accuracy decreases better than @xmath30 @xmath6 \times [ 0,500]$ close @xmath9 full range computation @xmath10\times 0,1500]$ near zeros functions region @xmath31 relative accuracy loses meaning absolute accuracy sense figure 3 cpu time spent code regions @xmath32\times 0,l pentium - ii 350-mhz processor debian - linux compiler gnu fortran compiler g77 figure 3 cpu times @xmath33\times 0,l function @xmath34 different methods speeds appear as @xmath34 grows small @xmath34 series cf method @xmath35 needed fastest methodsasymptotic expansions cpu times increase rapidly for @xmath34 larger than @xmath36 effect use quadratures prominent tables 1 and 2 show average time each method computation in microseconds for dkia and dlia routines percentage of use of each method shown data for two regions @xmath7 accuracy region ( @xmath8\times [ 0,200]$ ] table 1 and full range by routines ( @xmath10\times [ 0,1500]$ ] table 2 @xmath37 * table 1 percentage of use average cpu times each method in region @xmath8\times [ 0,200]$ @xmath38 table 2 percentage use average cpu times @xmath10\times 0,1500]$ algorithm tested in several computers operating systems ( pentium ii iv iv compilers ( g77 f77 digital fortan applications modified bessel functions only previously published algorithm is code by thompson and barnett @xcite ( tb algorithm for computation of coulomb wave functions of complex order tb algorithm has limitations when computing @xmath0 and @xmath1 functions more general algorithm designed for real parameters can be applied for complex parametersno available algorithms in public domain browsing gams compute @xmath0 @xmath1 derivatives figure 4 tb algorithm cpc library inaccurate for imaginary orders overflow convergence problems tested program coulcc @xcite against our algorithms figure 4 comparison lighter points flag detecting errors coulcc different from zero algorithm failed converge suffered overflows discrepancies persist for @xmath39 accuracy lower lighter points accuracy lost problems persist for larger values of @xmath3 @xmath2 figure 4 regions tb algorithm fails due to poor convergence overflows accuracy lost discrepancy greater than @xmath39 @xmath7 our algorithm first accurate efficient code modified bessel functions imaginary order accuracy close to full double precision domain a. gil , j. segura , n.m computing solutions modified bessel differential equation for imaginary orders positive arguments acm trans . math . soft submitted for publication issue | 0.320028 | 2,076 | 1,090 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,229 | in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions heavy quarks are produced out of thermal equilibrium in the very early stage of the reaction and their thermalization time was expected to be considerably larger than that of light quarks . on the other hand
, a strongly - interacting qgp can be envisaged in the heavy quark sector due to the presence of heavy - light hadron - like resonances in the qgp for temperatures up to @xmath0@xmath1 .
we investigate the consequences of such states employing a relativistic langevin simulation .
hadronization is modeled by a coalescence - fragmentation scheme .
we present the predictions for the nuclear modification factor and elliptic flow of @xmath2 and @xmath3 mesons at lhc energies and compare the results with the successful predictions of this model for rhic conditions .
we find similar heavy - quark thermalization effects at lhc and rhic . , , heavy quarks , quark - gluon plasma , collective flow , hadronization . 12.38 mh , 24.85.+p , 25.75 nq , 25.75 ld | for heavy quarks , their mass @xmath4@xmath5@xmath6@xmath7@xmath8 mev ( critical temperature ) . hence their kinetic equilibration time
is expected to be larger than that for light partons , thus showing better sensitivity to the in - medium interactions . due to a slower thermalization a smaller elliptic flow of @xmath2 mesons , @xmath9 ,
was expected ; however , it was suggested that a sizable @xmath9 could result from that of the light quarks @xcite through a coalescence hadronization mechanism @xcite .
surprisingly , data from the relativistic heavy - ion collider ( rhic ) for single electrons ( @xmath10 ) associated with semileptonic @xmath3 and @xmath2 decays in semi - central au - au collisions exhibited a @xmath11 of up to 10@xmath12 @xcite , indicating substantial collective behavior of charm ( @xmath13 ) quarks consistent with the assumption of a @xmath13-quark @xmath11 similar to the one for light quarks , apart from a @xmath14 shift due to radial - flow effects @xcite .
in addition , the nuclear suppression factor was found to be comparable to the pion one , @xmath15@xmath70.3 @xcite .
perturbative qcd ( pqcd ) calculations of radiative energy loss can not explain these findings , even after inclusion of elastic scattering .
based on lattice qcd ( lqcd ) results which suggest resonance structures in the meson - correlation function at moderate temperatures , an effective model for heavy - light quark scattering via @xmath2 and @xmath3 resonances was suggested @xcite .
when implementing such a picture into a langevin simulation the results for semileptonic @xmath10 spectra @xcite are in reasonable agreement with rhic data @xcite .
we employ a fokker - planck approach to evaluate drag and diffusion coefficients for @xmath13 and @xmath16 quarks in the qgp based on elastic scattering with light quarks via @xmath2- and @xmath3-meson resonances with a width @xmath17@xmath18@xmath19-@xmath20 mev ( supplemented by perturbative interactions ) @xcite .
heavy - quark ( hq ) kinetics in the qgp is treated as a relativistic langevin process @xcite , and the medium is modeled by a spatially homogeneous elliptic thermal fireball which expands isentropically . for rhic the details of the fireball and
the parameters used can be found in @xcite ; for lhc we extrapolate to @xmath21@xmath71400 for central @xmath22=5.5 tev pb - pb collisions .
the expansion parameters are adjusted to hydrodynamic simulations , resulting in a total lifetime of @xmath23@xmath76 fm / c at the end of a hadron - gas qgp mixed phase and an inclusive light - quark elliptic flow of @xmath24=7.5% .
the main change with respect to rhic is the expectation of a new `` phase '' in which hadron - like resonances melt at higher temperature . in order to implement this `` melting '' of @xmath2- and @xmath3-mesons above @xmath25=@xmath26@xmath7360 mev
, a `` transition factor '' @xmath27)^{-1}$ ] ( @xmath28=50 mev ) has been introduced into the transport coefficients .
initial hq spectra are computed using pythia with parameters as used by the alice collaboration @xcite , and @xmath13 and @xmath16 quarks are hadronized into @xmath2 and @xmath3 mesons at @xmath6 by coalescence with light quarks @xcite ; `` left - over '' heavy quarks are treated by @xmath29-function fragmentation .
distributions at rhic ( left ) and lhc ( right ) .
circles are the initial distribution , the bands show the ones after interactions in the qgp .
dashed lines are the thermal distributions shown for comparison.,title="fig:",width=240 ] distributions at rhic ( left ) and lhc ( right ) .
circles are the initial distribution , the bands show the ones after interactions in the qgp .
dashed lines are the thermal distributions shown for comparison.,title="fig:",width=240 ]
in fig . [ fig1 ] the invariant @xmath14 distributions for @xmath13 ( red ) and @xmath16 ( blue ) quarks at rhic ( left ) and lhc ( right ) are shown .
it is evident that the charm - quark distributions after rescattering in the sqgp ( band corresponding to the uncertainty in the resonance width ) are close to the thermal distribution for @xmath14@xmath30@xmath31 where most of the yield resides . on the contrary , @xmath16 quarks are predicted to be off - equilibrium ( even at lhc energies ) .
[ fig2 ] summarizes our results for hq diffusion in a qgp in terms of the meson @xmath32 and @xmath33 for @xmath16=7 fm pb - pb collisions at the lhc .
our most important findings are : ( a ) resonance interactions substantially increase ( decrease ) @xmath11 ( @xmath15 ) compared to perturbative interactions ; ( b ) @xmath16 quarks are much less affected than @xmath13 quarks , reducing the effects in the @xmath34 spectra ; ( c ) there is a strong correlation between a large @xmath11 and a small @xmath15 at the quark level , which , however , is partially reversed by coalescence contributions which increase _ both _ @xmath11 and @xmath15 at the meson ( and @xmath34 ) level .
this feature turned out to be important in the prediction of @xmath34 spectra at rhic ; ( d ) the predictions for lhc are quantitatively rather similar to our rhic results @xcite , due to a combination of harder initial hq-@xmath14 spectra ( see circles in fig . [ fig1 ] ) and a decrease in interaction strength in the early phases where non - perturbative resonance scattering is inoperative . therefore we conclude that if at rhic the dominant contribution to hq interactions are hadron - like resonances , at lhc we should observe an @xmath15 and @xmath11 pattern similar to rhic .
= 7 fm , @xmath22=5.5 tev pb - pb collisions : @xmath15 ( left ) and @xmath11 ( right ) for @xmath2 and @xmath3 mesons.,title="fig:",width=240,height=163 ] = 7 fm , @xmath22=5.5 tev pb - pb collisions : @xmath15 ( left ) and @xmath11 ( right ) for @xmath2 and @xmath3 mesons.,title="fig:",width=240,height=163 ] | heavy quarks mass critical temperature kinetic equilibration time larger light partons better sensitivity in - medium interactions slower thermalization smaller elliptic flow @xmath2 mesons expected sizable @xmath9 could result from light quarks coalescence hadronization mechanism data relativistic heavy - ion collider single electrons semileptonic @xmath3 decays exhibited @xmath11 up to 10@xmath12 @xcite collective behavior of quarks consistent @xmath13-quark @xmath11 similar light quarks @xmath14 shift due to radial - flow effects nuclear suppression factor comparable to pion one @xmath15@xmath70.3 @xcite perturbative qcd calculations radiative energy loss explain findings elastic scattering lattice qcd results resonance structures meson - correlation at moderate temperatures effective model for heavy - light quark scattering via @xmath2 @xmath3 resonances suggested @xcite langevin simulation results semileptonic @xmath10 spectra with rhic dataemploy fokker - planck approach drag diffusion coefficients @xmath13 quarks qgp based elastic scattering light quarks @xmath2- resonances width- mev perturbative interactions heavy - quark hq kinetics relativistic langevin process medium modeled homogeneous elliptic thermal fireball expands isentropically details fireball parameters in @xcite extrapolate to @xmath21@xmath71400 central @xmath22=5.5 tev pb - pb collisions expansion parameters adjusted to hydrodynamic simulations total lifetime @xmath23@xmath76 fm / c hadron - gas qgp mixed phase inclusive light - quark elliptic flow @xmath24=7.5% main change expectation new phase hadron resonances melt at higher temperature transition factor=50 mev introduced into transport coefficients initial hq spectra computed using pythia parameters alice collaboration quarks hadronized into @xmath2 @xmath3 mesons at @xmath6 coalescence light quarks left heavy quarks treated @xmath29-function fragmentationdistributions at rhic left lhc right circles initial distribution bands after interactions qgp dashed lines thermal distributions comparison distributions rhic left lhc right circles initial distribution bands after interactions qgp dashed lines thermal distributions comparison fig invariant @xmath14 distributions @xmath13 @xmath16 blue quarks at rhic left lhc right charm - quark distributions after rescattering sqgp close to thermal distribution @xmath14@xmath31 yield @xmath16 quarks off - equilibrium even at lhc energies fig2 results hq diffusion qgp meson @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath16=7 fm pb - pb collisions at lhc findings resonance interactions increase decrease @xmath11 @xmath15 ) compared perturbative interactions @xmath16 quarks less affected than @xmath13 quarks reducing effects @xmath34 spectra strong correlation between large @xmath11 small @xmath15 at quark level partially reversed by coalescence contributions increase @xmath11 @xmath15 at meson @xmath34 levelfeature important prediction @xmath34 spectra at rhic predictions lhc similar rhic results due harder initial hq-@xmath14 spectra fig decrease interaction strength early phases non - perturbative resonance scattering inoperative conclude rhic dominant contribution hq interactions hadron - like resonances at lhc observe @xmath15 @xmath11 pattern similar rhic 7 fm @xmath22=5.5 tev pb - pb collisions @xmath15 @xmath11 @xmath2 @xmath3 mesons @xmath22=5.5 tev pb - pb collisions @xmath15 @xmath11 mesons | 0.261451 | 1,549 | 779 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,232 | we study the quandle counting invariant for a certain family of finite quandles with trivial orbit subquandles .
we show how these invariants determine the linking number of classical two - component links up to sign .
keywords : virtual links , linking number , finite quandles 2000 msc : 57m27 , 55m25 | in the study of finite quandles and the knot invariants they define , decomposable quandles are often neglected in favor of indecomposable or connected quandles since for knots , two decomposable quandles with the same orbit decomposition define the same counting invariant : if @xmath0 then @xmath1 the sum of the counting invariants defined by the orbit subquandles , where @xmath2 denotes the cardinality of the set @xmath3 .
this follows from the fact that knot quandles have a single orbit , so the image of any homomorphism @xmath4 from a knot quandle @xmath5 into a finite target quandle @xmath6 must lie inside a single orbit .
the quandle of a multi - component link , however , is not connected , and the counting invariants defined by nonisomorphic decomposable quandles with the same orbit decomposition are generally different for links . the motivation for this paper was to study the counting invariants defined by decomposable quandles for multi - component virtual links .
we started with the case of finite target quandles whose orbits are trivial subquandles , so that all of the interesting structure is in the off - diagonal portion of the quandle s matrix trivial subquandles which have been put together in a non - trivial way .
we call such quandles _ trivial orbit quandles _ or
_ toqs_. our main result says that the linking number of a two - component classical link is determined up to sign by the counting invariants for a family of trivial orbit quandles of a particular form .
the paper is organized as follows : in section [ q ] we review the definitions of quandles , the quandle counting invariant and virtual linking numbers . in section [ l ]
we give our main result and some examples .
in this section we review some definitions .
@xmath7 @xmath8 next , we need we may specify a quandle structure on the finite set @xmath9 by giving an @xmath10 matrix @xmath11 whose entry in row @xmath12 column @xmath13 is @xmath14 where @xmath15 ; that is , @xmath11 is the operation table of @xmath16 where we forget the `` @xmath17 ' 's and just write the subscripts .
quandles and their structure have been studied in many works such as @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and more .
a quandle @xmath18 is _ decomposable _ if we may write @xmath0 where @xmath19 and @xmath20 are both subquandles of @xmath18 .
note that even if a quandle is not decomposable in this sense , we may still be able to write @xmath21 for @xmath22 disjoint subquandles ; see @xcite and @xcite .
a quandle is _ connected _ if there is an element @xmath23 such that every element of @xmath18 is equivalent to a word of the form @xmath24 in @xcite ( see also @xcite ) , a quandle is defined for any oriented tame classical link @xmath25 via a wirtinger - type presentation , which is called the _ knot quandle _ of the link @xmath25 .
specifically , looking in the positive direction of the overcrossing strand @xmath26 , if the undercrossing arc on the right is @xmath27 then the one on the left is @xmath28 .
note that we do not use the orientation of the undercrossing strand .
a @xmath29 the isomorphism type of the knot quandle is invariant under reidemeister moves ; indeed , the quandle axioms are chosen specifically to make this so . if @xmath25 is a knot and @xmath17 is a generator assigned to an arc in @xmath25 , then every generator ( and hence every word ) in the knot quandle is equivalent to a word starting with @xmath17 since we can just proceed around the knot following the specified orientation , picking up quandle operations to build a word , until we reach @xmath17 .
hence , the knot quandle of a single - component link is connected .
while joyce defined the knot quandle only for classical knots and links , in @xcite kauffman observed that the same wirtinger - type definition extends to virtual knots and links by simply ignoring virtual crossings .
the resulting quandle , while not a classifying invariant for virtual knots and links , is nevertheless an invariant of virtual isotopy . given a finite quandle @xmath6 ,
the number of homomorphisms from a knot quandle @xmath30 into @xmath6 is an easily computable link invariant : since @xmath30 is finitely generated , there is a finite set of possible homomorphisms into @xmath6 , so we can simply check which of these satisfy the relations in @xmath30 and hence are homomorphisms . the following is a standard result : let @xmath25 be a link with knot quandle @xmath30 and let @xmath6 be a finite quandle .
then the number of homomorphisms @xmath31 is an invariant of quandle isomorphism and hence is an invariant of virtual isotopy of the link .
indeed , joyce @xcite showed that the knot quandle determines both the knot group and a longitude , and hence determines the knot type of a classical knot up to homeomorphism ( not necessarily orientation preserving ) of pairs @xmath32 .
hence , many of the classical link invariants should be derivable from the knot quandle
. a deeper understanding of how link invariants arise from the knot quandle should provide us with a better understanding both of how other link invariants are related and of links themselves . in the next section we will show how linking number is determined up to sign by the quandle counting invariants associated to a particular kind of non - connected quandle .
we begin with a discussion of linking number for virtual knots . for classical links , the two linking numbers are equal since if @xmath33 crosses over @xmath34 at a positive crossing , it must either cross back over @xmath34 at a negative crossing ( contributing zero to both linking numbers ) or cross under @xmath34 at a positive crossing ( contributing @xmath35 to both linking numbers ) to come back to join itself without any virtual crossings . for virtual links ,
the two linking numbers are completely independent .
indeed , we have for virtual links , the virtual linking numbers have some advantages over the usual classical linking number . for example , if @xmath36 is split , then both @xmath38 and @xmath39 ; this is a stronger condition than @xmath40 , since contributions from two unequal virtual linking numbers may cancel .
as noted in @xcite , the first two quandle axioms are easy to check since the diagonal entries are @xmath45 in order and each column is a permutation of @xmath46 .
thus , we need only check that the third quandle axiom is satisfied .
we do this in cases .
case 1 : @xmath47 all in the same subquandle . in this case , @xmath48 since the subquandles are quandles themselves . for the remainder of this paper ,
let @xmath25 be a two - component virtual link diagram @xmath36 . to find quandle colorings of @xmath25
, we take a choice of color @xmath75 for one arc and attempt to `` push it through '' each crossing , that is , assign to the opposite undercrossing arc the color determined by the quandle coloring condition and the color on the overcrossing arc . since our coloring quandle @xmath42 is a trivial orbit quandle , pushing any color through at a crossing where both strands are from the same component yields the same color on both underarcs since the colors on a component are from the same trivial orbit subquandle .
thus we have : in a quandle coloring of a link by @xmath42 ( or any trivial orbit quandle ) , the colors on the undercrossing strands at a crossing can differ only if the overcrossing and undercrossing strands belong to distinct components .
[ l0 ] in a quandle coloring of @xmath25 by @xmath42 , an inbound undercrossing arc colored @xmath76 pushes through a crossing with an overarc colored @xmath77 to become @xmath78 at a positive crossing and @xmath79 at a negative crossing . pushing through any choice of color for a starting arc
extends the same color along that component of the link until overcrossings from the other component of @xmath25 are reached .
for any pair of starting arcs with one arc on each component , if both starting colors are from the same orbit , then both colors push through unchanged and we have a coloring of the link which is constant on each component . if the colors are from different orbits in @xmath42 , then one component has every arc colored @xmath77 , and a given starting coloring @xmath60 pushes through an overcrossing colored with @xmath77 to become @xmath82 or @xmath83 depending on the crossing sign . continuing pushing through each crossing , we eventually reach our original starting arc .
then we have a valid quandle coloring iff the color thus determined on the starting arc agrees with the original color . in both cases
( starting arcs in the same orbit subquandle or in different orbit subquandles ) , the colors on all of the arcs are determined by the colors on the initial two arcs .
there are @xmath81 such choices .
if we color one arc of @xmath84 with @xmath89 , then in any quandle coloring of @xmath25 every arc of @xmath84 must be colored with @xmath77 , since every element of @xmath42 acts trivially on @xmath77 . in order to have a valid quandle coloring
, the original color on the starting arc must match the color determined by pushing @xmath17 through the full length of the component to return to the starting arc .
lemma [ l0 ] implies that this final color is @xmath90 , so an initial color of @xmath91 on an arc of @xmath86 pushes through to a valid coloring iff @xmath92 .
finally , note that the property of pushing through does not depend on the actual value of @xmath91 , only its orbit , so if one such color yields a valid quandle coloring , then all @xmath88 colors in @xmath85 yield valid quandle colorings .
we have @xmath94 if @xmath25 has colorings with @xmath77 on @xmath84 and colors from @xmath85 on @xmath86 for both @xmath95 ; @xmath96 if @xmath25 has colorings with @xmath77 on @xmath84 and colors in @xmath85 on @xmath86 for @xmath97 or @xmath98 but not both ; and @xmath99 if @xmath25 has no multi - orbit colorings .
note that @xmath100 implies that the virtual linking numbers are unequal and @xmath25 is non - classical .
@xmath94 if and only if each starting coloring choice for a given pair of arcs on the two components pushes through to a valid coloring . by lemma [ l1
] , this can only happen if both virtual linking numbers are zero mod @xmath88 , i. e. , if @xmath107 and @xmath108 conversely , suppose @xmath110 for all @xmath114 .
then by corollary [ c1 ] at least one of the two virtual linking numbers is greater than 0 in absolute value .
if both are greater than 1 in absolute value , then let @xmath119 , contrary to hypothesis .
hence either @xmath111 , @xmath112 , or both @xmath115 .
if @xmath121 then neither linking number is 0 or 1 in absolute value by corollaries [ c1 ] and [ c2 ] .
then @xmath124 says that @xmath88 divides one linking number but not the other by lemma [ l1 ] ; @xmath125 is the largest number which divides both @xmath126 and @xmath127 by corollary [ c4 ]
. if both virtual linking numbers are zero , then corollary [ c1 ] says @xmath130 .
if both are @xmath131 , then by corollary [ c2 ] we have @xmath132 . finally , if @xmath133 ( which equals @xmath127 since @xmath25 is classical ) then the set @xmath134 includes all and only positive integer divisors of @xmath135 , so @xmath136
as a practical observation , we note that corollary [ c3 ] implies that it is not necessary to test an infinite number of quandle counting invariants to determine @xmath138 ; it is sufficient to compute @xmath80 for @xmath139 where @xmath140 is the number of multi - component crossings in @xmath25 .
of course , our interest in theorem [ main ] lies not in finding a new less practical method of computing linking numbers but rather as a connection between quandle - based link invariants and classical link invariants . | study finite quandles knot invariants decomposable quandles neglected indecomposable connected two decomposable quandles same orbit decomposition define same counting invariant @xmath0 @xmath1 sum counting invariants orbit subquandles @xmath2 denotes cardinality @xmath3 knot quandles single orbit homomorphism @xmath4 knot quandle @xmath5 into finite target quandle @xmath6 single orbit quandle multi - component link not connected counting invariants nonisomorphic decomposable quandles same orbit decomposition different for links motivation paper study counting invariants decomposable quandles for multi - component virtual links started finite target quandles orbits trivial subquandles structure off - diagonal matrix trivial subquandles quandles trivial orbit quandles toqs_ linking number of two - component classical link determined by counting invariants for family trivial orbit quandles form paper organized section [ q ] definitions quandles quandle counting invariant virtual linking numbers section [ l ] main result examples review definitions@xmath7 @xmath8 specify quandle structure finite set @xmath9 @xmath10 matrix @xmath11 entry row @xmath12 column @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath11 operation table of @xmath16 forget @xmath17 ' 's write subscripts quandles structure studied works @xcite quandle @xmath18 decomposable write @xmath0 @xmath19 @xmath20 subquandles of @xmath18 not decomposable write @xmath21 for @xmath22 disjoint subquandles @xcite quandle connected if element @xmath23 element @xmath18 equivalent to word form @xmath24 @xcite quandle defined oriented classical link @xmath25 wirtinger - type presentation knot quandle of link @xmath25 positive direction overcrossing strand @xmath26 undercrossing arc right is @xmath27 left is @xmath28 not use orientation undercrossing strand @xmath29 isomorphism type knot quandle invariant under reidemeister moves quandle axioms chosen@xmath25 knot @xmath17 generator arc generator word in knot quandle equivalent to word starting with @xmath17 proceed around knot orientation quandle operations build word until reach @xmath17 knot quandle single - component link connected joyce defined knot quandle for classical knots links @xcite kauffman observed extends virtual knots links ignoring virtual crossings resulting quandle not invariant virtual knots links invariant of virtual isotopy finite quandle @xmath6 number homomorphisms from quandle @xmath30 into @xmath6 computable link invariant finitely generated finite homomorphisms into @xmath6 check which satisfy relations standard result @xmath25 link with knot quandle @xmath30 @xmath6 finite quandle number of homomorphisms @xmath31 invariant of quandle isomorphism invariant of virtual isotopy link joyce @xcite showed knot quandle determines knot group longitude knot type classical knot homeomorphism pairs @xmath32 classical link invariants derivable from knot quandledeeper understanding link invariants from knot quandle better understanding other link invariants links next section linking number determined by quandle counting invariants non - connected quandle begin discussion linking number for virtual knots classical links two linking numbers equal if @xmath33 crosses over @xmath34 positive must cross back over negative zero or under positive join without virtual crossings virtual links two linking numbers independent linking numbers have advantages over classical linking number if @xmath36 split @xmath38 @xmath39 stronger condition than @xmath40 contributions unequal virtual linking numbers may cancel first two quandle axioms easy to check diagonal entries are @xmath45 order each column permutation of @xmath46 check third quandle axiom satisfied cases 1 : @xmath47 in same subquandle @xmath48 subquandles are quandles @xmath25 be two - component virtual link diagram @xmath36 find quandle colorings of @xmath25 take choice of color @xmath75 for one arc push through each crossing assign opposite undercrossing arc color determined by quandle coloring condition color overcrossing arccoloring quandle @xmath42 is trivial orbit pushing color at crossing same component yields same color on underarcs quandle coloring link by @xmath42 colors on undercrossing strands differ if distinct components quandle coloring of @xmath25 by @xmath42 inbound undercrossing arc colored @xmath76 pushes through crossing with overarc @xmath77 to become @xmath78 at positive and @xmath79 at negative pushing through color for starting arc extends same color until overcrossings from @xmath25 reached starting arcs if colors from same orbit both colors push through unchanged coloring constant on each component if colors from different orbits in @xmath42 one component has every arc colored @xmath77 starting coloring @xmath60 pushes through overcrossing @xmath77 to become @xmath82 or @xmath83 depending on crossing sign pushing through each crossing reach original starting arc valid quandle coloring color on starting arc agrees with original color colors on arcs determined by colors initial two arcs @xmath81 such choicescolor one arc @xmath84 with @xmath89 quandle coloring @xmath25 arc @xmath84 with @xmath77 element @xmath42 acts on @xmath77 valid quandle coloring original color starting arc must match color pushing @xmath17 lemma implies final color @xmath90 initial color @xmath91 on arc @xmath86 pushes to valid coloring @xmath92 property pushing through on value @xmath91 orbit one color yields valid quandle coloring all @xmath88 colors in @xmath85 yield valid colorings @xmath94 if @xmath25 colorings @xmath77 @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 for @xmath95 @xmath96 if colorings @xmath77 @xmath85 @xmath86 not @xmath99 if @xmath25 no multi - orbit colorings @xmath100 implies virtual linking numbers unequal @xmath25 non - classical @xmath94 each starting coloring choice arcs pushes through to valid coloring if both virtual linking numbers zero mod @xmath88 @xmath110 @xmath114 corollary one of two virtual linking numbers greater than 0both greater than 1 @xmath119 contrary hypothesis @xmath111 @xmath112 @xmath115 @xmath121 neither linking number 0 or 1 corollaries c1 c2 @xmath124 @xmath88 divides one number not other l1 @xmath125 largest divides @xmath126 @xmath127 corollary c4 ] both linking numbers zero corollary c1 ] says @xmath130 both @xmath131 corollary c2 @xmath132 @xmath133 equals @xmath127 @xmath25 classical @xmath134 includes positive integer divisors @xmath135 @xmath136 corollary c3 ] not necessary test infinite quandle invariants determine @xmath138 compute @xmath80 for @xmath139 @xmath140 multi - component crossings @xmath25 interest theorem not method linking numbers connection between quandle - based link invariants classical link invariants | 0.435944 | 2,856 | 1,523 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,244 | we show that every finitely - generated free subgroup of a right - angled , co - compact kleinian reflection group is contained in a surface subgroup . | it is conjectured that every co - compact kleinian group contains a surface subgroup .
we show that , for some special examples , much more is true . [ main ]
let @xmath0 be a right - angled , compact coxeter polyhedron in @xmath1 , and let @xmath2 be the group generated by reflections in the faces of @xmath0 .
then every finitely - generated free subgroup of @xmath3 is contained in a surface subgroup of @xmath3 .
_ remarks : _ + 1 .
it is well - known that every such @xmath3 contains a surface subgroup . indeed ,
it was shown in @xcite that the number of `` inequivalent '' surface subgroups of @xmath3 grows factorially with the genus .
lewis bowen has recently applied theorem [ main ] to show that every such @xmath3 contains a sequence of surface subgroups for which the hausdorff dimensions of the limit sets approach two ( see @xcite ) .
given a free subgroup @xmath4 , we look at the convex core @xmath5 , which will be homeomorphic to a handlebody . replacing @xmath6 with a suitable nighborhood in @xmath1 , we can expand the handlebody to make it polyhedral , so that the boundary is a union of copies of the faces of @xmath4 . by expanding further , we can make the induced decomposition of the boundary finer and finer .
if we expand enough , it becomes possible to attach mirrors to certain faces along the boundary ( see figure 1 ) , in such a way that the resulting 3-orbifold is the product of a compact 2-orbifold with an interval . the desired surface group is a finite - index subgroup of the 2-orbifold group .
the first ingredient is the tameness theorem .
let @xmath4 be a free subgroup of @xmath3 .
then by @xcite and @xcite , the ( infinite - volume ) hyperbolic manifold @xmath7 is _ topologically tame _ , i.e. homeomorphic to the interior of a compact 3-manifold
. then work of canary ( @xcite ) implies that @xmath4 is geometrically finite i.e. if @xmath8 is the convex hull of the limit set of @xmath4 , then @xmath9 is compact .
the next step , based on the ideas of @xcite , is to give a polyhedral structure to @xmath9 .
let @xmath10 be the tesselation of @xmath1 by copies of @xmath0 , and let @xmath11 be the _ tiling hull _ of @xmath4 this is the union of all the tiles in @xmath10 which meet @xmath8 .
then @xmath11 is invariant under @xmath4 , and @xmath12 is a compact , irreducible 3-manifold with free fundamental group .
thus @xmath12 is a handlebody @xmath13 .
the tesselation @xmath10 induces a tesselation of @xmath14 .
since all dihedral angles of @xmath0 are @xmath15 , then every pair of adjacent faces in @xmath14 will meet at an angle of either @xmath15 or @xmath16 .
however , if two faces meet at an angle of @xmath16 , then we actually consider them as part of a single face .
thus , every face in @xmath14 can be decomposed as a union @xmath17 , where each @xmath18 is congruent to a face of the original polyhedron @xmath0 . along each @xmath18
, we may attach to @xmath13 a copy of @xmath0 , to obtain a handlebody with convex boundary containing @xmath13 , called the * expansion of w along f*. more generally , we define an * expansion * of @xmath13 to be a handlebody @xmath19 , obtained from @xmath13 by a finite sequence of such operations .
let @xmath20 be the genus of @xmath21 , and represent @xmath21 as @xmath22 , for a planar surface @xmath0 .
let @xmath23 be the boundary curves of @xmath24 .
say that a collection of faces @xmath25 of @xmath26 forms a * face annulus * if the faces can be indexed @xmath27 , where @xmath28 is adjacent to @xmath29 if and only if @xmath30 ( mod n ) , and @xmath31 . the last condition excludes the case of three faces meeting at a vertex .
we may assume , after an isotopy , that each face in @xmath14 meets @xmath40 in a collection of disjoint , properly embedded arcs .
let @xmath41 suppose @xmath42 .
let @xmath43 be the number of faces in @xmath14 which meet @xmath40 in @xmath44 components .
let @xmath45 such that @xmath46 , and let @xmath32 be the expansion of @xmath13 along @xmath4 . note that @xmath47 is a polyhedron @xmath48 ( made up of copies of @xmath0 ) with dihedral angles @xmath15 .
let @xmath49 be the face of @xmath48 which is identified to @xmath4 , and let @xmath50 be the faces in @xmath48 which are adjacent to @xmath49 , in cyclic order .
let @xmath51 , and let @xmath52 be the union of @xmath53 together with all faces in @xmath48 which meet faces in @xmath53 . since @xmath48 is a coxeter polyhedron in @xmath1 , it follows that @xmath54 is an embedded disk .
( of lemma [ gamma ] ) + + * case 1 : * there are four endpoints ( say @xmath66 ) which lie on four distinct sides of @xmath49 .
+ in this case , we let @xmath67 be a properly embedded arc in @xmath53 , disjoint from @xmath68 , which separates @xmath69 and @xmath70 ( see figure 2 ) . for each @xmath71 , let @xmath72 ( resp .
@xmath73 ) be an arc , properly embedded in some @xmath29 , so that one endpoint is on @xmath74 , the other is the point @xmath75 ( resp .
@xmath76 ) , and so that the arcs @xmath77 are all disjoint from each other and from @xmath67 .
let @xmath78 be the component of @xmath79 which is disjoint from @xmath67 .
let @xmath80 .
after an isotopy ( supported in a neighborhood of @xmath78 in @xmath81 ) the arcs @xmath59 satisfy the hypotheses of the lemma .
+ + * case 2 : * suppose that some edge of @xmath4 meets every arc @xmath58 .
+ we repeat the construction from case 1 .
( i.e. pick an arc @xmath67 in @xmath53 disjoint from the @xmath58 s , separating @xmath69 and @xmath70 ; then construct @xmath82 s , @xmath78 s , and @xmath59 s . )
the only difference is that we must arrange that the arcs @xmath83 are not all parallel ( i.e. their union meets at least three distinct sides ) , and that the arcs @xmath84 are not all parallel .
this can be done , since , @xmath48 being a right - angled coxeter polyhedron in @xmath1 , each @xmath85 has at least five edges .
( see figure 3 ) .
now we return to the proof of lemma [ annuli ] .
we obtain a loop @xmath86 in @xmath32 , by replacing each @xmath87 with @xmath88 .
let @xmath89 .
since the face @xmath4 has been removed , and replaced by faces which meet @xmath90 in fewer than @xmath44 components , we have @xmath91 .
similarly , we see that , by enlarging @xmath13 repeatedly , @xmath43 can be reduced until it reaches 0 . by further enlargements , we may assume that @xmath92 .
so we may assume that @xmath38 is connected for each @xmath4 .
let @xmath34 be the union of the faces which meet @xmath35 .
for each face @xmath4 in @xmath93 , let us define the * overlap * of @xmath4 by the formula : @xmath94 since the core curve of @xmath34 is essential in @xmath13 , no point in @xmath14 meets every face in @xmath34 .
thus , if @xmath95 for all @xmath96 , then the @xmath34 s are the disjoint face annuli we are looking for .
let @xmath4 be a face in @xmath34 , let @xmath97 and @xmath98 be the two faces in @xmath34 which are consecutive to @xmath4 , and let @xmath99 .
let @xmath100 and @xmath101 be the components of @xmath102 .
we say that @xmath4 is * good * if one of the @xmath59 s is disjoint from the interior of @xmath93 .
+ + * case 3 : * every face in @xmath93 is good .
+ let @xmath4 be a face in some @xmath34 , and let @xmath103 . by previous assumption , @xmath104 is connected .
let @xmath105 and @xmath106 be the endpoints of @xmath104 . as before ,
let @xmath32 be the enlargement of @xmath13 along @xmath4 , let @xmath107 , and let @xmath49 be the face of @xmath32 which is identified to @xmath4 .
let @xmath50 be the faces adjacent to @xmath49 in @xmath48 , labeled consecutively , so that @xmath108 and @xmath109 .
since @xmath4 is good , then we may assume that none of the faces @xmath110 is glued to a face in @xmath93 .
as in the proof of lemma [ gamma ] , we replace @xmath104 with an appropriate arc @xmath111 . in this case , we choose arcs @xmath112 ( resp .
@xmath113 ) from @xmath105 ( resp .
@xmath106 ) to @xmath114 , so that @xmath112 and @xmath113 each meet only one face of @xmath115 .
we let @xmath116 be the component of @xmath117 contained in @xmath110 ; then we perturb @xmath116 so that it is a properly embedded arc in @xmath118 . see figure 4 .
a complication is that @xmath119 may not be an embedded circle in @xmath48 , and thus there may be pairs of adjacent faces in @xmath48 which meet @xmath116 non - consecutively . in this case
, we perform `` shortcut '' operations on @xmath116 , as indicated in figure 5 .
let @xmath120 .
then we have the required arc @xmath121 , and a new loop @xmath122 .
the number of faces with positive overlap decreases , so eventually we may eliminate them all .
+ + * case 4 : * suppose there is a face @xmath4 in @xmath93 which is not good .
+ here the construction is similar to the construction of case 3 . in this case , we choose @xmath116 to be either of the two components of @xmath123 ; then we push @xmath116 off of @xmath114 ; and then , as in case 3 , we perform shortcuts if possible .
the result is that the face @xmath4 is removed , and replaced with good faces . repeating this operation along all faces which are not good
, we may reduce to case 3 .
returning to the proof of theorem [ main ] , we let @xmath124 be the group generated by @xmath4 , together with the reflections in the lifts to @xmath1 of the faces of the face annuli @xmath125 .
then we claim that @xmath124 is the group of a closed , hyperbolic 2-orbifold .
indeed , let @xmath126 be the orbifold with underlying space @xmath13 , and with mirrors on the faces of @xmath125 .
then @xmath126 is a hyperbolic 3-orbifold with convex boundary , and there is a local isometry @xmath127 , with induced map @xmath128 , so that @xmath129 . since @xmath126 has convex boundary ,
every element in @xmath130 is represented by a closed geodesic , and since @xmath71 takes geodesics to geodesics , it follows that @xmath71 is @xmath131-injective .
note that @xmath126 is equivalent to a product orbifold @xmath132 , where @xmath133 is the 2-orbifold with reflector edges corresponding to one of the components of @xmath134 .
thus @xmath135 is isomorphic to the orbifold fundamental group of @xmath133 .
the orientable double cover of @xmath133 is a 2-orbifold , @xmath136 , where the underlying space is an orientable surface of genus @xmath20 , and the cone points of @xmath137 all have order 2 .
if we identify @xmath124 with @xmath138 , then the loops generating @xmath4 all lift to @xmath137 , and so @xmath139 .
the group @xmath140 has a torsion - free subgroup , of index two ( if the number of cone points is even ) or four ( if the number of cone points is odd ) , containing @xmath4 .
this is the surface subgroup we were looking for
. 2 ian agol , `` tameness of hyperbolic 3-manifolds '' , arxiv : math/0405568 .
+ l. bowen , `` free groups in lattices '' , pre - print .
+ r. d. canary , `` a covering theorem for hyperbolic @xmath141-manifolds and its applications '' , _ topology _ * 35 * ( 1996 ) , no .
3 , 751778 .
+ d. calegari and d. gabai , `` shrinkwrapping and the taming of hyperbolic 3-manifolds '' , _
* 19 * ( 2006 ) , no .
2 , 385446 ( electronic ) . | conjectured co - compact kleinian group contains surface subgroup special examples more true @xmath0 right - angled compact coxeter polyhedron in @xmath1 @xmath2 group generated by reflections faces @xmath0 finitely - generated free subgroup of @xmath3 contained in surface subgroup @xmath3 @xmath3 contains surface subgroup number inequivalent surface subgroups @xmath3 grows with genus lewis bowen applied theorem @xmath3 contains surface subgroups hausdorff dimensions limit sets approach two free subgroup @xmath4 look convex core @xmath5 homeomorphic to handlebody replacing @xmath6 suitable nighborhood @xmath1 expand handlebody make polyhedral boundary union of copies faces @xmath4 expanding induced decomposition boundary finer expand attach mirrors to faces along boundary figure 1 resulting 3-orbifold product of compact 2-orbifold with interval desired surface group finite - index subgroup of 2-orbifold group first ingredient tameness theorem let @xmath4 be free subgroup of @xmath3@xcite infinite - volume hyperbolic manifold @xmath7 topologically tame homeomorphic compact 3-manifold canary implies @xmath4 geometrically finite @xmath8 convex hull limit @xmath4 @xmath9 compact next step polyhedral structure to @xmath9 @xmath10 tesselation @xmath1 @xmath0 @xmath11 tiling hull @xmath4 union tiles @xmath10 @xmath8 @xmath11 invariant under @xmath4 @xmath12 compact irreducible 3-manifold free fundamental group @xmath12 handlebody @xmath13 tesselation @xmath10 induces tesselation @xmath14 dihedral angles @xmath0 are @xmath15 adjacent faces @xmath14 meet angle @xmath15 or @xmath16 two faces meet angle @xmath16 single face face @xmath14 decomposed union @xmath17 each @xmath18 congruent to face original polyhedron @xmath0 attach @xmath13 copy @xmath0 handlebody convex boundary containing @xmath13 expansion of w along f*.define expansion @xmath13 handlebody @xmath19 obtained from @xmath13 operations @xmath20 genus of @xmath21 represent as @xmath22 planar surface @xmath0 @xmath23 boundary curves of @xmath24 collection faces @xmath25 @xmath26 forms face annulus if indexed @xmath27 @xmath28 adjacent to @xmath29 if @xmath30 @xmath31 excludes three faces meeting vertex each face @xmath14 meets @xmath40 embedded arcs @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 number faces @xmath14 @xmath40 @xmath44 components @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath32 expansion of @xmath13 along @xmath4 @xmath47 polyhedron @xmath48 dihedral angles @xmath15 @xmath49 face of @xmath48 identified @xmath4 @xmath50 faces @xmath48 adjacent to @xmath49 cyclic order @xmath51 @xmath52 union of @xmath53 faces @xmath48 @xmath53 @xmath48 coxeter polyhedron in @xmath1 @xmath54 embedded disklemma gamma case 1 four endpoints @xmath66 on four sides of @xmath49 @xmath67 arc in @xmath53 disjoint from @xmath68 separates @xmath69 @xmath70 figure 2 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 arc embedded in @xmath29 one endpoint on @xmath74 other @xmath75 @xmath76 arcs @xmath77 disjoint @xmath67 @xmath78 component of @xmath79 disjoint from @xmath67 @xmath80 isotopy @xmath78 @xmath81 arcs @xmath59 satisfy hypotheses lemma case 2 edge of @xmath4 meets arc @xmath58 repeat construction case 1 pick arc @xmath67 in @xmath53 disjoint from @xmath58 separating @xmath69 @xmath70 construct @xmath82 @xmath78 s @xmath59 s difference arcs @xmath83 not all parallel union meets three sides arcs @xmath84 not all parallel @xmath48 right - angled coxeter polyhedron in @xmath1 @xmath85 has five edges figure 3 return to proof of lemma [ annuliobtain loop @xmath86 in @xmath32 replacing @xmath87 with @xmath88 @xmath89 face @xmath4 removed replaced by faces @xmath90 fewer @xmath44 components @xmath91 enlarging @xmath13 @xmath43 until 0 enlargements assume @xmath92 @xmath38 connected each @xmath4 @xmath34 union of faces @xmath35 @xmath93 define overlap @xmath4 formula @xmath94 core curve @xmath34 essential @xmath13 no point @xmath14 meets every face @xmath34 @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath34 s disjoint face annuli let @xmath4 face in @xmath34 @xmath97 @xmath98 faces @xmath34 consecutive to @xmath4 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 components of @xmath102 @xmath4 good if @xmath59 s disjoint from @xmath93 every face in @xmath93 good @xmath4 face in @xmath34 @xmath103 @xmath104 connected @xmath105 @xmath106 endpoints of @xmath104@xmath32 enlargement of @xmath13 along @xmath4 @xmath107 @xmath49 face of @xmath32 identified to @xmath4 @xmath50 faces adjacent to @xmath49 in @xmath48 labeled consecutively @xmath108 and @xmath109 @xmath4 good assume none @xmath110 glued to face @xmath93 replace @xmath104 with arc @xmath111 choose arcs @xmath112 from @xmath105 to @xmath114 meet one face @xmath115 @xmath116 component of @xmath117 @xmath110 perturb @xmath116 properly embedded arc in @xmath118 figure 4 @xmath119 not embedded circle in @xmath48 pairs of adjacent faces @xmath48 meet @xmath116 non - consecutively perform shortcut operations on @xmath116 figure 5 @xmath120 required arc @xmath121 new loop @xmath122 number of faces with positive overlap decreases eliminate all case 4 face @xmath4 in @xmath93 not good construction similar to case 3choose @xmath116 components @xmath123 push @xmath116 off @xmath114 perform shortcuts face @xmath4 removed replaced with good faces operation faces reduce to case 3 proof @xmath124 group generated by @xmath4 reflections in lifts @xmath1 faces @xmath125 claim @xmath124 group closed hyperbolic 2-orbifold @xmath126 orbifold underlying space @xmath13 mirrors on faces @xmath125 @xmath126 hyperbolic 3-orbifold convex boundary local isometry @xmath127 induced map @xmath128 @xmath129 @xmath126 convex boundary element @xmath130 represented by closed geodesic @xmath71 geodesics geodesics @xmath71 @xmath131-injective @xmath126 equivalent to product orbifold @xmath132 @xmath133 2-orbifold reflector edges @xmath134 @xmath135 isomorphic to orbifold fundamental group @xmath133 orientable double cover @xmath133 2-orbifold @xmath136 underlying space orientable surface of genus @xmath20 cone points of @xmath137 order 2 .identify @xmath124 @xmath138 loops generating @xmath4 lift to @xmath137 @xmath139 @xmath140 torsion - free subgroup index two even or four odd containing @xmath4 surface subgroup ian agol hyperbolic 3-manifolds arxiv math/0405568 l. bowen free groups lattices pre - print r. d. canary covering theorem hyperbolic @xmath141-manifolds applications topology 35 1996 ) no . 3 751778 d. calegari d. gabai shrinkwrapping taming hyperbolic 3-manifolds 19 2006 ) no . 2 385446 | 0.497699 | 3,249 | 1,847 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,266 | we try to apply the cosmic crystallography method of lehoucq , lachieze - rey , and luminet to a universe model with closed spatial section of negative curvature . but the sharp peaks predicted for einstein - de sitter closed models do not appear in our hyperbolic example .
so we turn to a variant of that method , by subtracting from the distribution of distances between images in the closed model , the similar distribution in friedmann s open model .
the result is a plot with much oscillation in small scales , modulated by a long wavelength quasi - sinusoidal pattern . | the idea of cosmic crystallography was introduced by lehoucq et al .
@xcite , and applied by them to several einstein - de sitter ( eds ) models with closed ( i. e. , compact and boundless ) spatial sections of euclidean geometry and nontrivial topology .
the simplest of these cases has the three - torus @xmath0 as spatial section - model e1 in lachize - rey and luminet @xcite review article on cosmic topology .
this model provides the sharpest example of the crystallographic effect of the topology : if @xmath1 is based on a cube of side @xmath2 as fundamental polyhedron ( fp ) then the distances between images of a single source are in the form @xmath3 with @xmath4 integers , so that a plot of the distribution of distances @xmath5 vs. @xmath6 provides neat peaks in the integral values @xmath7 in the other five eds models with closed spatial sections the peaks tend to be in smaller numbers or less sharp , because the distances between some of the images of a single source depend on the latter s position inside the fp .
this is characteristic of locally but not globally homogeneous models @xcite , and can be seen in the study of model e4 by fagundes and gausmann @xcite : when @xmath8 mpc is of the order of magnitude of the observable universe s radius , no peaks showed up in the distribution @xmath9 these studies are based on computer simulated catalogs , and can not yet be compared with real catalogs , given the present limitations of the latter .
the same absence of obvious peaks is true for a model with a closed hyperbolic manifold @xmath10 as spatial section , and hence the metric of friedmann s open model .
this is illustrated in figs . 1 and 2 , with @xmath10 the second of best s @xcite three manifolds with an icosahedron as fp , and
listed as number @xmath11 in the census of closed , orientable hyperbolic manifolds in weeks s computer program snappea 2.5.3 @xcite .
the figure shows plots of @xmath5 against the distances in megaparsecs , assuming the density parameter @xmath12 and hubble s constant @xmath13 km sec@xmath14mpc@xmath15 and a radius of @xmath16 mpc , equivalent to maximum redshift @xmath17 which we take to be the position of the surface of last scattering ( sls ) of the cosmic microwave background .
figures 1 and 2 show the plots for the distributions for the compact model and the infinite model , respectively .
although there is more wiggling in the former , the general shape is the same for both .
so we tried a further step in the crystallography method , which is to map the _ differences _ between the distributions for the compact and infinite cases . in sec .
2 we explain our method and present the results , and in sec .
3 the latter are discussed .
to fix our notation let the metric of the hyperbolic friedmann model be written as @xmath18.\ ] ] to simulate a random distribution of sources in the fp , we first looked for such a distribution in the ball enclosed by the icosahedron s circumscribing sphere , with radius @xmath19 this was done by dividing the ball into 13 shells of thickness @xmath20 with volume @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the medium radius of the shell ; and also dividing the solid angle space into ten zones , with @xmath23 in each zone , where @xmath24 and @xmath25 the zone s medium value of @xmath26 then a number ( @xmath27 ) of pseudorandom positions in the ball were chosen by computer , with the condition that the occupations in each shell and zone were proportional to @xmath28 and @xmath29 respectively .
finally a program routine excluded from the obtained points those that were outside the icosahedron .
the @xmath30 remaining ones were considered the positions of the sources in the fp .
the radius of the sls in normalized units is @xmath31 for the assumed values of @xmath32 and @xmath33 . in order to fill this space without gaps we needed @xmath34 copies of the icosahedron , besides the fp itself .
they were produced by the @xmath35 face - pairing generators @xmath36 ( one - letter words ) of the covering group @xmath37 , @xmath38 two - letter , and @xmath39three - letter words in the@xmath40 s .
this set of icosahedra cover hyperbolic space up to a radius @xmath41 , slightly larger than @xmath42 .
the @xmath34 operators were then applied to each of the @xmath30 sources , the result being accepted as an image if it lay inside the sls ( @xmath43 ) .
the total of potential images ( they are potential in the sense that , because of evolution and other factors , many of them may not be observable ) thus obtained , including the sources , was @xmath44
. then we looked for the present ( or comoving ) distances between each pair of these images , by multiplying the normalized distances by the curvature radius of the universe ( see , for example , @xcite ) , @xmath45 mpc .
a list was prepared by grouping the numbers of occurrence of distances in bins of @xmath46 mpc width .
the corresponding plot is shown in fig . 1 .
we proceeded to obtain a similar distribution in friedmann s open model , with the same parameters as above , but with the same number of pseudorandom sources as there are images , i. e. , @xmath44 sources .
a list similar to the one above mentioned was plotted in fig .
2 . as indicated in the introduction , we could not see a significant difference between these plots .
finally we subtracted the values of the second list from those of the first .
3 is a plot of these differences .
one notices wild oscillations in the scale of the bin width , modulated by a broad pattern , on the scale of @xmath47 we fitted this plot with a five - term fourier series of the form @xmath48 where @xmath49 nearest integer to @xmath50 mpc ) , @xmath51 258 , and \{@xmath52 } = \{96.6 , 134.4 , -211.7 , 127.0 , -89.4}.
a _ clifford translation _ of a metric space @xmath53 is an isometry @xmath54 of @xmath55 such that _ _ distance__@xmath56 is independent of point @xmath57 .
wolf @xcite . in a recent paper , gomero et al .
@xcite link the existence of sharp peaks in cosmic crystallography to that of elements of @xmath58 which are clifford translations of the universal covering space of @xmath59 .
( see also lehoucq et al .
@xcite . ) but in fig . 1 of @xcite we see a significant peak that may not be produced by a clifford translation .
the matter deserves further investigation . in the case of the hyperbolic space @xmath11 treated here
, there seems indeed to be no sharp peaks , as predicted by @xcite and @xcite .
( it should be interesting to look for them in the case of a highly symmetrical manifold , like the hyperbolic dodecahedron space @xcite . )
this is why we proceeded to look for the differences in the distribution of distances between this model and friedmann s open model , whose plot does show a significant pattern . of course we would not expect to be able to infer the correct cosmic topology from a single plot , even one with sharp peaks .
the topology of the universe will probably be revealed slowly and progressively , as more and better data are obtained , and several topology searching methods are applied to them .
e. g. thanks conselho nacional de desenvolvimento cientfico e tecnolgico ( cnpq - brazil ) for a doctorate scholarship and financial help for participation in this symposium .
h. v. f. thanks cnpq for partial financial support , and fundao de amparo pesquisa do estado de so paulo ( fapesp ) for a grant to attend this event .
figure 1 . a plot of the number of occurences of the distances in the abscissa , in bins of @xmath46 mpc , for model with the finite , multiply connected manifold @xmath11 as spatial section@xmath60 with a simulated catalog of @xmath61sources and @xmath44 potential images . | cosmic crystallography introduced by lehoucq et al applied to einstein - de sitter models with closed spatial sections of euclidean geometry nontrivial topology simplest three - torus @xmath0 as spatial section - model e1 in lachize - rey and luminet article example crystallographic effect if @xmath1 based on cube side @xmath2 fundamental polyhedron distances between images single source @xmath3 with @xmath4 integers distribution @xmath5 vs @xmath6 provides peaks in integral values in other models with closed sections peaks smaller less sharp distances depend on position inside fp characteristic of locally not homogeneous models in model e4 by fagundes and gausmann @xmath8 no peaks in distribution studies based on computer simulated catalogs can not be compared with real catalogs absence of peaks for model with closed hyperbolic manifold @xmath10 as spatial section of friedmann s open model illustrated in figs 1 2 @xmath10 second best @xcite three manifolds icosahedron fp number @xmath11 census closed orientable hyperbolic manifolds weeks computer program snappea 2.5.3 @xcite figure shows plots @xmath5 distances megaparsecs density parameter @xmath12 hubble s constant @xmath13 km sec@xmath14mpc@xmath15 radius @xmath16 mpc maximum redshift @xmath17 position surface last scattering cosmic microwave background figures 1 2 plots distributions compact infinite model more wiggling former general shape same both map differences distributions compact infinite cases sec . 2 explain method present results sec . 3 discussed fix notation metric hyperbolic friedmann model written @xmath18. simulate random distribution sources fp distribution ball icosahedron circumscribing sphere radius @xmath19 dividing ball 13 shells thickness @xmath20 volume @xmath21 @xmath22 medium radius shell dividing solid angle space ten zones @xmath23 each zone @xmath24 @xmath25 zone medium value @xmath26 number @xmath27 pseudorandom positions ball chosen computer occupations shell zone proportional @xmath28 @xmath29program routine excluded points outside icosahedron @xmath30 remaining considered positions sources in fp radius of sls in units is @xmath31 for assumed values @xmath32 and @xmath33 fill space needed @xmath34 copies icosahedron besides produced by @xmath35 face - pairing generators @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 two @xmath39three - letter words@xmath40 s icosahedra cover hyperbolic space up to radius @xmath41 slightly larger than @xmath42 @xmath34 operators applied to @xmath30 sources result accepted as image if inside sls ( @xmath43 ) total of potential images obtained including sources was @xmath44 looked for present distances between images by multiplying distances by curvature radius universe list prepared grouping numbers occurrence distances in bins of @xmath46 mpc width corresponding plot shown in fig . 1 similar distribution in friedmann s open model same parameters same number of pseudorandom sources as images @xmath44 sources list similar plotted in fig . 2 significant difference between plotssubtracted values second list from first. 3 plot differences notices wild oscillations in bin width modulated by broad pattern scale @xmath47 fitted plot with five - term fourier series form @xmath48 @xmath49 nearest integer to @xmath50 mpc ) @xmath51 258 @xmath52 = {96.6 , 134.4 -211.7 127.0 -89.4} clifford translation metric space @xmath53 isometry @xmath54 of @xmath55 distance__@xmath56 independent of point @xmath57 @xcite link sharp peaks in cosmic crystallography to elements @xmath58 clifford translations universal covering space @xmath59 fig . 1 @xcite significant peak not clifford translation deserves further investigation hyperbolic space @xmath11 no sharp peaks predicted by @xcite interesting look for them symmetrical manifold hyperbolic dodecahedron space @xcite proceeded for differences in distribution distances model friedmann s open model significant pattern expect infer correct cosmic topology from single plot sharp peaks topology universe revealed slowly as more better data obtained topology searching methods appliedconselho nacional desenvolvimento cientfico tecnolgico brazil doctorate scholarship financial help symposium cnpq financial support fundao amparo pesquisa estado so paulo grant event figure 1 plot occurences distances abscissa bins @xmath46 mpc model finite connected manifold @xmath11 spatial section@xmath60 simulated catalog @xmath61sources @xmath44 potential images | 0.31279 | 1,905 | 1,014 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,276 | hyper - kamiokande will be a next generation underground water cherenkov detector with a total ( fiducial ) mass of 0.99 ( 0.56 ) million metric tons , approximately 20 ( 25 ) times larger than that of super - kamiokande .
one of the main goals of hyper - kamiokande is the study of @xmath0 asymmetry in the lepton sector using accelerator neutrino and anti - neutrino beams . in this paper ,
the physics potential of a long baseline neutrino experiment using the hyper - kamiokande detector and a neutrino beam from the j - parc proton synchrotron is presented .
the analysis uses the framework and systematic uncertainties derived from the ongoing t2k experiment . with a total exposure of 7.5 mw @xmath1 10@xmath2 sec integrated proton beam power ( corresponding to @xmath3 protons on target with a 30 gev proton beam ) to a @xmath4-degree off - axis neutrino beam , it is expected that the leptonic @xmath0 phase @xmath5 can be determined to better than 19 degrees for all possible values of @xmath5 , and @xmath0 violation can be established with a statistical significance of more than @xmath6 ( @xmath7 ) for @xmath8 ( @xmath9 ) of the @xmath10 parameter space . using both @xmath11 appearance and @xmath12 disappearance data ,
the expected 1@xmath13 uncertainty of @xmath14 is 0.015(0.006 ) for @xmath15 . | the discovery of neutrino oscillations by the super - kamiokande ( super - k ) experiment in 1998 @xcite opened a new window to explore physics beyond the standard model ( bsm ) .
evidence of neutrino oscillations is one of the most convincing experimental proofs known today for the existence of bsm physics at work .
the mixing parameters of neutrinos were found to be remarkably different from those of quarks , which suggests the presence of an unknown flavor symmetry waiting to be explored .
the extremely small masses of neutrinos compared with those of their charged partners lead to the preferred scenario of a seesaw mechanism @xcite , in which small neutrino masses are a reflection of the ultra - high energy scale of bsm physics .
furthermore , a theoretical framework called leptogenesis points to the intriguing possibility that @xmath0 asymmetries related to flavor mixing among the three generations of neutrinos may have played an important role in creating the observed matter - antimatter asymmetry in the universe @xcite .
this makes a study of the full picture of neutrino masses and mixings and the measurement of the @xmath0 asymmetry in the neutrino sector among the most important and urgent subjects in today s elementary particle physics world .
@xmath0 asymmetry in the neutrino sector arising from the presence of the phase which corresponds to the kobayashi - maskawa phase @xcite in the quark sector , can only be seen if all the three mixing angles governing neutrino oscillations differ from zero .
the super - k detector has successfully measured all three angles .
the angle @xmath16 was first measured in atmospheric neutrino observations @xcite , @xmath17 was constrained in solar neutrino observations @xcite ( together with another water cherenkov detector sno @xcite ) , and the evidence of non - zero @xmath18 was found by t2k @xcite which used super - k as the far detector . in 2013 , t2k established @xmath19 oscillation with 7.3@xmath13 significance , leading the way towards @xmath0 violation measurements in neutrinos @xcite in combination with precise measurements of @xmath18 by reactor neutrino experiments @xcite .
the highly successful super - k program indicates that hyper - kamiokande ( hyper - k ) is well placed to discover @xmath0 violation . in this paper ,
the physics potential of a long baseline neutrino experiment using the hyper - kamiokande detector and a neutrino beam from the j - parc proton synchrotron is presented .
the hyper - k detector is designed as a next generation underground water cherenkov detector that serves as a far detector of a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment for the j - parc neutrino beam and as a detector capable of observing proton decays , atmospheric and solar neutrinos , and neutrinos from other astrophysical origins .
the baseline design of hyper - k is based on the well - proven technologies employed and tested at super - k .
hyper - k consists of two cylindrical tanks lying side - by - side , the outer dimensions of each tank being @xmath20 the total ( fiducial ) mass of the detector is 0.99 ( 0.56 ) million metric tons , which is about 20 ( 25 ) times larger than that of super - k .
a proposed location for hyper - k is about 8 km south of super - k ( and 295 km away from j - parc ) and 1,750 meters water equivalent ( or 648 m of rock ) deep .
the inner detector region is viewed by 99,000 20-inch pmts , corresponding to the pmt density of @xmath21 photo - cathode coverage ( the same as the second phase of super - k ) .
the schematic view of the hyper - k detector is illustrated in fig .
[ fig : hk - schematic - view ] .
in addition to the long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment that is the main focus of this paper , hyper - k will provide a rich program in a wide range of science @xcite .
the scope of the project includes observation of atmospheric and solar neutrinos , proton decays , and neutrinos from other astrophysical origins .
the physics potential of hyper - k is summarized in table [ tab : intro : phys ] . [ cols="<,<,<",options="header " , ] [ tab:23sensitivity ] the result shown above is obtained with @xmath14 and @xmath22 as free parameters as well as @xmath23 and @xmath5 , with a nominal parameters shown in table [ tab : oscparam ] .
the use of the @xmath24 sample in addition to @xmath25 enables us to also precisely measure @xmath14 and @xmath22 .
figure [ fig : theta23 - 0.50 ] shows the 90% cl allowed regions for the true value of @xmath26 together with the 90% cl contour by t2k @xmath12 disappearance measurement @xcite .
hyper - k will be able to provide a precise measurement of @xmath14 and @xmath22 .
figure [ fig : theta23 - 0.45 ] shows the 90% cl allowed regions on the @xmath14-@xmath22 plane , for the true values of @xmath27 and @xmath28 ev@xmath29 . for the determination of @xmath16 , a @xmath12 disappearance measurement provides precise measurement of @xmath30 .
however , when @xmath31 , there are two possible solutions ( @xmath16 and @xmath32 ) which give the same @xmath30 .
this is known as the octant degeneracy . as seen from eq .
[ eq : cpv - oscprob ] , @xmath11 appearance measurement can determine @xmath33 .
in addition , the reactor experiments provide almost pure measurement of @xmath23 . thus , the combination of those complimentary measurements is known to be able to resolve this degeneracy if @xmath16 is sufficiently away from @xmath34 @xcite . as shown in fig . [
fig : theta23 - 0.45 ] , with a constraint on @xmath23 from the reactor experiments , hyper - k measurements can resolve the octant degeneracy and precisely determine @xmath14 .
the expected precision of @xmath22 and @xmath14 for true @xmath35 with reactor constraint on @xmath23 is summarized in table [ tab:23sensitivity ] .
discrimination of the wrong hierarchy hypothesis as a function of the assumed true value of @xmath36 .
bottom : the discrimination between the wrong octant for each value of @xmath36 .
the uncertainty from @xmath5 is represented by the thickness of the band .
vertical dashed lines indicate 90% confidence intervals of @xmath14 from the t2k measurement in 2014 @xcite . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=60.0% ] discrimination of the wrong hierarchy hypothesis as a function of the assumed true value of @xmath36 .
bottom : the discrimination between the wrong octant for each value of @xmath36 .
the uncertainty from @xmath5 is represented by the thickness of the band .
vertical dashed lines indicate 90% confidence intervals of @xmath14 from the t2k measurement in 2014 @xcite . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=60.0% ] atmospheric neutrinos can provide an independent and complementary information to the accelerator beam program on the study of neutrino oscillation .
for example , through the matter effect inside the earth , a large statistics sample of atmospheric neutrinos by hyper - k will have a good sensitivity to the mass hierarchy and @xmath16 octant . assuming a 10 year exposure , hyper - k s sensitivity to the mass hierarchy and the octant of @xmath16 by atmospheric neutrino data are shown in fig .
[ fig : atmsens ] . depending on the true value of @xmath16 the sensitivity changes considerably , but for all currently allowed values of this parameter the mass hierarchy sensitivity exceeds @xmath6 independent of the assumed hierarchy . if @xmath16 is non - maximal , the atmospheric neutrino data can be used to discriminate the octant at @xmath6 if @xmath37 or @xmath38 . in the previous sections ,
the mass hierarchy is assumed to be known prior to the hyper - k measurements .
this is a reasonable assumption considering the increased opportunities , thanks to a large value of @xmath18 , of ongoing and proposed projects for mass hierarchy determination .
however , even if the mass hierarchy is unknown before the start of experiment , hyper - k itself will be able to determine it with the atmospheric neutrino measurements .
values for accelerator and atmospheric neutrino measurements assuming that the mass hierarchy is unknown .
the true mass hierarchy is normal hierarchy and the true value of @xmath39 .
bottom : by combining the two measurements , the sensitivity can be enhanced . in this example
study , the @xmath40 is simply added .
[ fig : lbl - atm],title="fig:",scaledwidth=60.0% ] values for accelerator and atmospheric neutrino measurements assuming that the mass hierarchy is unknown .
the true mass hierarchy is normal hierarchy and the true value of @xmath39 .
bottom : by combining the two measurements , the sensitivity can be enhanced . in this example
study , the @xmath40 is simply added .
[ fig : lbl - atm],title="fig:",scaledwidth=60.0% ] because hyper - k will observe both accelerator and atmospheric neutrinos with the same detector , the physics capability of the project can be enhanced by combining two complementary measurements . as a demonstration of such a capability
, a study has been done by simply adding @xmath40 from two measurements , although in a real experiment a more sophisticated analysis is expected . assuming the true mass hierarchy of normal hierarchy and the true value of @xmath39 , the values of expected @xmath40 as a function of @xmath5 for each of the accelerator and atmospheric neutrino measurements , _ without _ assumption of the prior mass hierarchy knowledge , are shown in the top plot of fig .
[ fig : lbl - atm ] . for the accelerator neutrino measurement
, there is a second minimum near @xmath41 because of a degeneracy with mass hierarchy assumptions . on the other hand
, the atmospheric neutrino measurement can discriminate the mass hierarchy , but the sensitivity to the @xmath0 violating phase @xmath5 is worse than the accelerator measurement . by adding the information from both measurements , as shown in the bottom plot of fig .
[ fig : lbl - atm ] , the fake solution can be eliminated and a precise measurement of @xmath5 will be possible .
the sensitivity to leptonic @xmath0 asymmetry of a long baseline experiment using a neutrino beam directed from j - parc to the hyper - kamiokande detector has been studied based on a full simulation of beamline and detector . with an integrated beam power of 7.5 mw@xmath110@xmath2 sec
, the value of @xmath5 can be determined to better than 19@xmath42 for all values of @xmath5 and @xmath0 violation in the lepton sector can be observed with more than 3 @xmath13 ( 5 @xmath13 ) significance for 76% ( 58% ) of the possible values of @xmath5 .
using both @xmath11 appearance and @xmath12 disappearance data , a precise measurement of @xmath14 will be possible .
the expected 1@xmath13 uncertainty is 0.015(0.006 ) for @xmath15 .
this work was supported by mext grant - in - aid for scientific research on innovative areas number 25105004 , titled `` unification and development of the neutrino science frontier . ''
in addition , participation of individual researchers has been further supported by funds from jsps , japan ; the european union erc-207282 , h2020 rise - ga644294-jennifer and h2020 rise - ga641540-skplus ; rsf , rfbr and mes , russia ; jsps and rfbr under the japan - russia research cooperative program . | discovery of neutrino oscillations by super - kamiokande experiment in 1998 opened new window physics beyond standard model evidence neutrino oscillations convincing for bsm physics mixing parameters of neutrinos different from quarks suggests unknown flavor symmetry small masses of neutrinos with charged partners lead to seesaw mechanism reflection of ultra - high energy scale bsm physics theoretical framework leptogenesis points to asymmetries related to flavor mixing neutrinos may matter - antimatter asymmetry in universe study of neutrino masses mixings measurement of @xmath0 asymmetry in neutrino sector important particle physics asymmetry in from phase to kobayashi - maskawa phase in quark sector seen if three mixing angles governing neutrino oscillations differ from zero super - k detector measured all three angles angle @xmath16 first measured in atmospheric neutrino observations @xmath17 constrained in solar neutrino observations evidence of non - zero @xmath18 found by t2k @xcite super - k as detector2013 t2k established @xmath19 oscillation 7.3@xmath13 significance leading @xmath0 violation measurements neutrinos @xcite precise measurements @xmath18 reactor neutrino experiments successful super - k program indicates hyper - kamiokande discover @xmath0 violation physics potential long baseline neutrino experiment hyper - kamiokande detector neutrino beam j - parc proton synchrotron presented hyper - k detector next generation underground water cherenkov detector far detector long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment proton decays atmospheric solar neutrinos other astrophysical origins design hyper - k based technologies super - k two cylindrical tanks outer dimensions @xmath20 total mass 0.99 0.56 million metric tons 20 times larger super - k proposed location 8 km south of super - k 295 km from j - parc 1,750 meters water 648 m rock deep inner detector region viewed by 99,000 20-inch pmts @xmath21 photo - cathode coverage schematic view hyper - k detector illustrated fig .long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment main focus paper hyper - k rich program science scope project includes observation atmospheric solar neutrinos proton decays neutrinos astrophysical origins physics potential hyper - k summarized in table result obtained with @xmath14 @xmath22 free parameters @xmath23 @xmath5 nominal parameters in table oscparam use @xmath24 sample @xmath14 @xmath22 figure shows 90% cl allowed regions for value @xmath26 90% cl contour by @xmath12 disappearance measurement hyper - k precise measurement of @xmath14 @xmath22 figure shows 90% cl allowed regions on @xmath14-@xmath22 plane for true values @xmath27 @xmath28 determination @xmath16 @xmath12 disappearance measurement provides precise measurement of @xmath30 @xmath31 two possible solutions @xmath16 @xmath32 give same @xmath30 known as octant degeneracy @xmath11 appearance measurement determine @xmath33 reactor experiments provide pure measurement of @xmath23 combination complimentary measurements resolve degeneracy if @xmath16 away from @xmath34 @xcite shown in fig . - with constraint on @xmath23 hyper - k measurements resolve octant degeneracy determine @xmath14 expected precision of @xmath22 @xmath14 for @xmath35 with reactor constraint on @xmath23 summarized in table [ tab:23sensitivity discrimination of wrong hierarchy hypothesis assumed value @xmath36 wrong octant uncertainty from @xmath5 by thickness band dashed lines indicate 90% confidence intervals of @xmath14 from t2k measurement 2014 wrong octant uncertainty from @xmath5 by thickness band lines indicate 90% confidence intervals of @xmath14 from t2k measurement 2014 atmospheric neutrinos provide information to accelerator beam program neutrino oscillation large sample of atmospheric neutrinos by hyper - k good sensitivity to mass hierarchy @xmath16 octant 10 year exposure hyper - k s sensitivity to mass hierarchy octant of @xmath16 data shown in fig .fig : atmsens depending value @xmath16 sensitivity changes all allowed values mass hierarchy sensitivity exceeds @xmath6 independent assumed hierarchy if @xmath16 non - maximal atmospheric neutrino data discriminate octant at @xmath6 @xmath37 or @xmath38 mass hierarchy assumed known prior hyper - k measurements reasonable assumption considering increased opportunities large value @xmath18 ongoing projects for mass hierarchy determination if mass hierarchy unknown before experiment hyper - k with atmospheric neutrino measurements values accelerator neutrino measurements mass hierarchy unknown true mass hierarchy is normal hierarchy value of @xmath39 combining two measurements sensitivity enhanced @xmath40 added fig : lbl - atm]=60.0% values accelerator mass hierarchy unknown true mass hierarchy is normal hierarchy value of @xmath39 combining two measurements sensitivity enhanced @xmath40 added hyper - k accelerator atmospheric neutrinos physics capability enhanced by combining two measurementsstudy @xmath40 from two measurements sophisticated analysis expected assuming true mass hierarchy value @xmath39 values @xmath40 function @xmath5 for accelerator atmospheric neutrino measurements shown in top plot fig accelerator neutrino measurement second minimum near @xmath41 degeneracy mass hierarchy atmospheric neutrino measurement mass hierarchy sensitivity to @xmath0 violating phase @xmath5 worse than accelerator adding information from both measurements fake solution eliminated precise measurement of @xmath5 possible sensitivity to leptonic @xmath0 asymmetry of long baseline experiment neutrino beam j - hyper - detector studied simulation integrated beam power 7.5 mw@xmath110@xmath2 sec value of @xmath5 better than 19@xmath42 for all values @xmath5 violation lepton sector 3 @xmath13 ( 5 ) significance for 76% ( 58% ) of possible values @xmath5 using @xmath11 appearance and @xmath12 disappearance data precise measurement of @xmath14 possible expected 1@xmath13 uncertainty is 0.015(0.006 ) for @xmath15 work supported by mext grant scientific research innovative areas 25105004 unification development neutrino science frontier participation researchers supported by funds from jsps japan european union h2020 rise - rsf rfbr mes russia jsps rfbr japan - russia research cooperative program | 0.43006 | 2,634 | 1,322 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,288 | hera jet data , in addition to combined hera inclusive data , are input to the herapdf nlo qcd analysis in order to further constrain the gluon pdf and to allow an accurate evaluation of @xmath0 | the herapdf1.0 parton distribution functions ( pdfs ) were extracted using the combined inclusive cross section data from the h1 and zeus collaborations taken at the hera collider during the hera - i running period 1992 - 1997 @xcite .
these data come from neutral and charged current interactions from both @xmath1 and @xmath2 scattering .
the combination of the h1 and zeus data sets takes into account the full correlated systematic uncertainties of the individual experiments such that the total uncertainty of the combined measurement is typically smaller than @xmath3 , for @xmath4 gev@xmath5 , and reaches @xmath6 , for @xmath7 gev@xmath5 .
these pdfs have been updated to herapdf1.5 ( see lhapdfv6.8.6 , http : projects.hepforge.org / lhapdf ) by including a new preliminary combination of the hera inclusive cross section data from the hera - ii running period 2003 - 2007 @xcite .
these data have greater accuracy at high @xmath8 and high @xmath9 than the hera - i data and thus they serve to decrease the pdf uncertainty in these kinematic regions . in this presentation
we discuss the extension of the herapdf1.5 analysis to include inclusive jet data . the new pdf set which results is called herapdf1.6 @xcite .
the jet data included in herapdf1.6 are : two sets of high-@xmath8 inclusive jet production data from zeus @xcite , low-@xmath8 inclusive jet data from h1 @xcite and normalised high-@xmath8 inclusive jet data from h1 @xcite .
the gluon pdf contributes only indirectly to the inclusive dis cross sections .
however , the qcd processes that give rise to scaling violations in the inclusive cross sections , namely the qcd - compton ( qcdc ) and boson - gluon - fusion ( bgf ) processes , are observed as events with distinct jets in the final state provided that the energy and momentum transfer are large enough .
the cross section for qcdc scattering depends on @xmath10 and the quark pdfs . for hera kinematics , this process dominates the jet cross section at large scales , where the quark densities are well known from the inclusive cross - section data , so that the value of @xmath10 may be extracted without strong correlation to the shape of the gluon pdf .
the cross section for the bgf process depends on @xmath10 and the gluon pdf so that measurements of jet cross sections also provide a direct determination of the gluon density .
perturbative qcd predicts the @xmath8 evolution of the parton distributions , but not the @xmath9 dependence .
parton distributions are extracted by performing a direct numerical integration of the dglap equations at nlo ( nnlo fits are discussed in the presentation of radescu ) .
a parametrised analytic shape for the parton distributions is assumed to be valid at some starting value of @xmath11 . for the herapdf the value @xmath12gev@xmath5 is chosen such that the starting scale is below the charm mass threshold , @xmath13 .
then the dglap equations are used to evolve the parton distributions up to a different @xmath8 value , where they are convoluted with nlo coefficient functions to make predictions for the structure functions .
the heavy quark coefficient functions are calculated in the general - mass variable - flavour - number scheme of @xcite , with recent modifications @xcite .
the heavy quark masses for the central fit were chosen to be @xmath14gev and @xmath15gev and the strong coupling constant was fixed to @xmath16 .
the predictions are then fitted to the combined hera data sets for nc and cc @xmath17 and @xmath18 scattering .
a minimum @xmath8 cut of @xmath19 gev@xmath5 was imposed to remain in the kinematic region where perturbative qcd should be applicable . for the jet data the nlo cross - sections
are made using nlojet++ @xcite but such calculations are too slow to be used in an iterative qcd fit hence the programme fastnlo @xcite is used to make these calculations by convoluting pre - calculated weights with the pdfs and @xmath20 .
the fit parameters are those necessary to specify the input analytic shape . just as for herapdf1.0 and 1.5 the valence quark distributions @xmath21 , @xmath22 , and the @xmath23-type and @xmath24-type anti - quark distributions @xmath25 , @xmath26 ( @xmath27 , @xmath28 )
are parametrised at the input scale @xmath29gev@xmath5 by the generic form @xmath30 the parametrisation for the gluon distribution @xmath31 is extended , in comparison to the herapdf1.5 nlo parametrisation , to include a term @xmath32 , such that the nlo gluon may become negative at low @xmath9 and low @xmath8 ( however it does not do so in the kinematic region of the hera data ) .
a further significant extension of the parametrisation is that the low-@xmath9 valence parameters , @xmath33 and @xmath34 are no longer set equal .
otherwise the choice of central parametrisation is as for the published herapdf1.0(1.5 ) fits .
briefly , the normalisation parameters , @xmath35 , are constrained by the quark number sum - rules and momentum sum - rule .
the @xmath36 parameters @xmath37 and @xmath38 are set equal , @xmath39 , such that there is a single @xmath36 parameter for the sea distributions .
the strange quark distribution is expressed as @xmath9-independent fraction , @xmath40 , of the @xmath24-type sea , @xmath41 at @xmath42 . the value @xmath43 would render the @xmath44 and @xmath24 quark densities the same , but the value @xmath45 is chosen to be consistent with determinations of this fraction using neutrino - induced di - muon production .
the further constraint @xmath46 , together with the requirement @xmath39 , ensures that @xmath47 as @xmath48 .
for the central fit only the @xmath21 pdf has non - zero @xmath49 and @xmath50 parameters .
the experimental uncertainties on the herapdf are determined using the conventional @xmath51 tolerance , @xmath52 , for @xmath53c.l .
however model uncertainties and parametrisation uncertainties are also considered .
the choice of the heavy quark masses is varied in the ranges , @xmath54gev and @xmath55gev .
the choice of @xmath56 is varied in the range , @xmath57 , and the choice of the strangeness fraction is varied in the range , @xmath58 . the difference between the central fit and the fits corresponding to model variations of @xmath59 , @xmath60 , @xmath40 , @xmath56
are added in quadrature , separately for positive and negative deviations , to represent the model uncertainty of the herapdf1.6 set .
parametrisation variations for which the @xmath49 and the @xmath50 parameters for all the pdfs are freed one at a time are considered and variation of the starting scale @xmath42 in the range , @xmath61gev@xmath5 , is also considered as parametrisation variation . the difference between these parametrisation variations and the central fit is stored and an envelope representing the maximal deviation at each @xmath9 value is constructed to represent the parametrisation uncertainty .
[ fig : jetnojetfrac ] compares the herapdf1.6 nlo fit including the jet data ( right ) to a the herapdf1.5f nlo fit which does not include these data ( left ) .
note that the herapdf1.5f fit differs from the publically available herapdf1.5 nlo fits in that it has the same flexible parametrisation for the central fit as herapdf1.6 : there are extra parameters for the gluon pdf and the low - x behaviour of @xmath23-valence and @xmath24-valence are not required to be the same . [ cols="^,^ " , ]
hera jet data have been used in addition to hera inclusive data in order to determine the parton distributions in the proton in an nlo qcd fit .
there is no tension between the jet data and the inclusive data .
the pdf set including the jet data , herapdf1.6 , is similar to the publically available herapdf1.5 set both in pdf central values and in uncertainties .
however , the advantage of using jet data is clearly seen when the strong coupling constant @xmath0 is allowed to be a free parameter of the fits .
the uncertainty on the low-@xmath9 gluon pdf due to the correlation with @xmath0 is much reduced when jet data are used and an accurate value of @xmath0 can be obtained : @xmath62 , excluding scale error .
f. d. aaron _ et al . _
[ h1 and zeus collaboration ] , jhep * 1001 * ( 2010 ) 109 [ arxiv:0911.0884 [ hep - ex ] ] .
see talk of v. radescu , these proceedings ; a.m.cooper-sarkar , arxiv:1012.1438 ; v. radescu , pos ( ichep2010 ) 168 ; h1 and zeus collaborations , h1prelim-10 - 142 , zeus - prel-10 - 018 ; h1 and zeus collaborations , h1prelim-10 - 141 , zeus - prel-10 - 017 | herapdf1.0 parton distribution functions extracted using combined cross section data from h1 zeus collaborations at hera collider 1992 - 1997 data from neutral charged current interactions from @xmath1 @xmath2 scattering combination h1 zeus data systematic uncertainties total uncertainty smaller than @xmath3 @xmath4 reaches @xmath6 @xmath7 pdfs updated to herapdf1.5 hera inclusive cross section data from hera - ii period 2003 - 2007 @xcite data greater accuracy at high @xmath8 @xmath9 decrease pdf uncertainty in regions extension herapdf1.5 analysis to include inclusive jet data new pdf herapdf1.6 @xcite data high-@xmath8 jet production data from zeus @xcite low-@xmath8 jet from h1 @xcite normalised high-@xmath8 jet data from h1 @xcite gluon pdf contributes indirectly to inclusive dis cross sections qcd processes scaling violations cross sections - compton boson - gluon - fusion observed as with distinct jets in final state energy momentum transfer largecross section qcdc scattering @xmath10 quark pdfs kinematics dominates jet cross section large scales quark densities known value @xmath10 extracted without correlation gluon pdf cross section bgf depends @xmath10 gluon pdf gluon density perturbative qcd predicts @xmath8 evolution parton distributions not @xmath9 dependence parton distributions extracted numerical integration dglap equations at nlo parametrised analytic shape parton distributions valid at starting value @xmath11 herapdf value @xmath12gev@xmath5 chosen starting scale below charm mass threshold @xmath13 dglap equations evolve parton distributions @xmath8 value convoluted with nlo coefficient functions structure functions heavy quark coefficient functions calculated general - mass variable - flavour - number scheme @xcite heavy quark masses central fit @xmath14gev @xmath15gev strong coupling constant fixed @xmath16 predictions fitted to hera data sets for @xmath17 @xmath18 scattering minimum @xmath8 cut of @xmath19@xmath5 region perturbative qcdjet data nlo cross - sections using nlojet++ @xcite calculations slow iterative qcd fit fastnlo @xcite used convoluting pre - calculated weights with pdfs @xmath20 fit parameters specify input analytic shape herapdf1.0 1.5 valence quark distributions @xmath21-type anti - quark distributions @xmath25 parametrised at input scale @xmath29gev@xmath5 generic form @xmath30 parametrisation gluon distribution @xmath31 extended include term @xmath32 nlo gluon negative at low @xmath9 @xmath8 kinematic region hera data low-@xmath9 valence parameters @xmath33 no longer set equal central parametrisation herapdf1.0(1.5 ) fits normalisation parameters @xmath35 constrained by quark number sum - rules momentum sum - rule @xmath36 parameters set equal single @xmath36 parameter for sea distributions strange quark distribution expressed as @xmath9-independent fraction of @xmath24-type sea @xmath42value @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath24 quark densities same @xmath45 chosen consistent with determinations neutrino - induced di - muon production constraint @xmath46 requirement @xmath39 ensures @xmath47 as @xmath48 central fit @xmath21 pdf has non - zero @xmath49 @xmath50 parameters experimental uncertainties herapdf determined using conventional @xmath51 tolerance @xmath52 @xmath53c.l model uncertainties parametrisation uncertainties considered choice heavy quark masses varied in @xmath56 varied strangeness fraction varied @xmath58 difference between central fit model variations @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath40 added in quadrature deviations model uncertainty herapdf1.6 set parametrisation variations @xmath49 @xmath50 parameters freed considered variation starting scale @xmath42 parametrisation variation difference between variations central fit stored envelope maximal deviation at each @xmath9 value constructed parametrisation uncertainty fig : compares herapdf1.6 nlo fit including data to herapdf1.5f nlo fit dataherapdf1.5f fit differs same flexible parametrisation central as herapdf1.6 extra parameters for gluon pdf low - x behaviour of @xmath23 @xmath24-valence not required hera jet data used inclusive data parton distributions in proton in nlo qcd fit no tension between jet data inclusive data pdf set jet herapdf1.6 similar to herapdf1.5 set in central values uncertainties advantage of jet data when strong coupling constant @xmath0 free parameter uncertainty on low-@xmath9 gluon pdf correlation @xmath0 reduced when jet data accurate value of @xmath0 obtained excluding scale error aaron et al . h1 zeus collaboration ] jhep * 1001 ( 2010 ) 109 arxiv:0911.0884 v. radescu proceedings.cooper-sarkar arxiv:1012.1438 ) 168 h1 zeus collaborations h1prelim-10 - 142 zeus - prel-10 - 018 - | 0.315004 | 2,199 | 1,152 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,293 | extending our recent work @xcite , we report on a calculation of the vector current correlation function for light valence quarks in the deconfined phase of quenched qcd in the temperature range @xmath0 . after performing a systematic analysis of the influence of cut - off effects on light quark
meson correlators using clover improved wilson fermions , we discuss resulting constraints on the electrical conductivity in a quark gluon plasma . | the spectral representation of the correlation functions of the vector current directly relates to the invariant mass spectrum of dileptons and photons .
additionally in the limit of small frequencies it determines a transport coefficient , in the case of the vector correlation function of light quarks , the electrical conductivity .
+ at temperatures relevant for current heavy ion experiments non - perturbative techniques are mandatory for the determination of these quantities .
perturbative studies of the vector spectral functions @xcite and also the inclusion of non - perturbative aspects through the hard thermal loop resummation scheme @xcite break down , especially in the low invariant mass region , indicated by an infrared divergent euclidean correlator @xcite , leading to an infinite electrical conductivity
. however it could be demonstrated that the spectral function at low invariant masses in fact increases linearly resulting in a finite electrical conductivity of the quark gluon plasma @xcite .
this behavior could also be established by previous work using lattice qcd @xcite .
+ in @xcite we analyzed the vector correlation function at @xmath1 and performed its extrapolation to the continuum limit based on precise data at various lattice sizes , corresponding to different lattice cutoffs .
we then obtained reliable results for the determination of the spectral properties and the extraction of the dilepton rates and transport coefficients . here
we report on a first extension of this work to a wider temperature range and present results on the electrical conductivity in the temperature region @xmath0 .
the desired information is encoded in the large distance region of temporal euclidean correlation functions of the vector current at non - zero temperature and fixed spatial momentum , @xmath2 whereby the current - current correlation functions can be represented in terms of an integral over spectral functions , @xmath3 : @xmath4 here we denote by @xmath5 the sum over the three space - space components of the spectral function and also introduce the vector spectral function @xmath6 .
+ the time - time component of the vector correlation function , @xmath7 , is conserved and can be shown to be proportional to the quark number susceptibility , @xmath8 . the vector correlation functions @xmath9 and @xmath10 therefore differ only by a constant , @xmath11 at high temperature and for large energies corrections to the free field behavior can be calculated perturbatively ; the vector spectral function can be deduced from the calculation of one loop corrections to the leading order results for the thermal dilepton rate @xcite .
this yields , @xmath12 in the free field , infinite temperature limit the spatial part of the spectral function contains a @xmath13-function at the origin .
different from the time - time component , where the @xmath13-function is protected by current conservation , this @xmath13-function is smeared out at finite temperature and the low energy part of @xmath5 is expected to be described by a breit - wigner peak @xcite , @xmath14 the limit @xmath15 is sensitive to transport properties in the thermal medium and in this case it leads to the electrical conductivity @xmath16 the breit - wigner form then yields @xmath17 . note here that in the infinite temperature limit the width of the breit - wigner peak vanishes , while at the same time @xmath18 , @xmath19 and consequently the electrical conductivity is infinite in the non - interacting case .
+ these considerations give rise to a sensible ansatz describing the high temperature vector spectral function : @xmath20 this ansatz depends on four temperature dependent parameters ; the quark number susceptibility @xmath21 , the strength ( @xmath22 ) and width ( @xmath23 ) of the breit - wigner peak and the parameter @xmath24 that parametrizes deviations from a free spectral function at large energies .
+ in the following we will use this ansatz to extract the electrical conductivity and the vector spectral function from the correlator data .
in addition to the vector correlation function itself we will calculate its curvature at the largest euclidean time separation accessible at non - zero temperature , _
i.e. _ at @xmath25 .
the curvature is the second thermal moment of the spectral functions at vanishing momentum , @xmath26 where @xmath27 is chosen to be even as all odd moments vanish .
these thermal moments give the taylor expansion coefficients for the correlation function expanded around the mid - point of the euclidean time interval , @xmath28 in the infinite temperature , free field limit the integral in eq .
[ eq : speccora ] can be evaluated analytically @xcite and one straight forwardly obtains the first three non - vanishing moments for massless quarks @xmath29 note here that all thermal moments , @xmath30 with @xmath31 , will be sensitive to the smeared @xmath13-function contributing to @xmath32 although we expect this contribution to become more and more suppressed in higher order moments @xcite .
+ in the following we will analyze the ratio of @xmath33 and the free field correlator @xmath34 , @xmath35 as well as the ratio of mid - point subtracted correlation functions @xmath36 here we used the notation @xmath37 . note that the curvature of these ratios at the mid - point determines the deviation of ratios of thermal moments from the corresponding free field values .
while the ratios of correlation functions differ in the @xmath38 and @xmath39 channels due to the additional constant contributing to @xmath40 , this constant drops out in the subtracted correlation function , _
i.e. _ , @xmath41 and @xmath42 for @xmath43 .
.parameters for the calculation of vector correlation functions on lattices of size @xmath44 . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] to discuss the consequences of our findings on the vector spectral function we invoke the breit - wigner+continuum ansatz defined in eq.[eq : ansatz ] and fit to the @xmath45 and @xmath46 data respecting also the thermal moments .
additionally we analyze the dependence of the fit parameters on @xmath47 , as , with the data being subject to potentially large lattice effects , we expect large errors originating from the fit - window we choose .
the resulting parameters are summarized in tab.[tab : fit - tdep ] .
+ here it can be seen that the results at @xmath48 and @xmath49 have the largest errors , nevertheless these results should be closest to those in the continuum as only the furthest distance points are comparatively free of lattice effects . without a continuum extrapolation
however it is at this point not possible to cleanly discern the residual deviation due to the lattice cut - off .
decreasing @xmath47 on the other hand leads to visible systematic trends in the parameters , as such the correction term @xmath50 and the width @xmath51 both increase with decreasing @xmath47 , while the electrical conductivity decreases .
additionally the @xmath52 increases with decreasing @xmath47 implying a lower quality fit with lower @xmath47 . in light of the argument above these results
show that indeed the lattice effects influence the fit more strongly with smaller @xmath47 , as they can not be taken care of by the employed ansatz .
consequently we attribute the largest part of the systematic trends observed above to the lattice effects .
+ focusing on the parameters themselves note that the correction factor @xmath24 is the most accurately determined .
clearly it shows an increasing trend with decreasing temperature differing by a factor @xmath53 between @xmath46 and @xmath54 .
however as @xmath24 is coupled to the strong coupling via @xmath55 @xcite , this behavior is expected . the same can be seen for the width @xmath56 and the parameter @xmath57 , they also slightly increase with decreasing temperature .
however here , they remain within errors of each other and the increase between @xmath46 and @xmath54 is small .
naturally this also leads to only small deviations of the electrical conductivity .
note however that the results at @xmath58 differ by @xmath59 from those of @xmath60 , while this deviation is only @xmath61 for @xmath62 . with the @xmath58 lattice being most affected by the systematics of the fit , we assume the largest part of this deviation to find its origins there .
even so we find the electrical conductivity to be to a good degree constant and within @xmath63 across the temperature region evaluated here , whereby the values at the individual temperatures have fit errors around @xmath64 .
+ in the temperature range @xmath0 our results therefore imply that the electrical conductivity depends linearly on temperature as expected from perturbation theory @xcite and at @xmath65 we find the value : @xmath66 whereby the first error quoted corresponds to the temperature effects and the second to the fit errors .
extending our earlier study we presented results on the vector correlation function in the high temperature phase of quenched qcd in the temperature range @xmath0 .
first results show a similar behavior to those extensively analyzed at @xmath67 and even at @xmath54 we find no sizable contribution attributable to the @xmath68-resonance . +
even though these calculations could not yet be extended to include also a continuum extrapolation as in @xcite , we were nevertheless able to extract the relevant spectral properties to calculate the electrical conductivity via an ansatz and found this phenomenologically relevant transport coefficient to depend linearly on temperature with a value of @xmath69 . + given the exact relation between the electrical conductivity and the diffusion constant , @xmath70 , it would be interesting to compare these results with those obtained in the case of charm diffusion @xcite or from the momentum diffusion constant @xmath71 calculable via hqet @xcite and we will do so in an upcoming publication . 99 -2pt h. t. ding .
, a. francis , o. kaczmarek , f. karsch , e. laermann and w. sldner , ; o. kaczmarek , a. francis , for an overview and further references , see for instance : f. gelis , j. p. blaizot and f. gelis , e. braaten and r.d .
pisarski , f. karsch , m. g. mustafa and m. h. thoma , p. b. arnold , g. d. moore and l. g. yaffe , ; ; p. aurenche , f. gelis , g. d. moore and h. zaraket , s. gupta , ; g. aarts et al .
, t. altherr and p. aurenche , g. aarts and j. m. martinez resco , p. petreczky and d. teaney , j. hong and d. teaney , w. florkowski and b.l .
friman , k. g. wilson , m. lscher , s. sint , r. sommer , p. weisz and u. wolff , s. wissel , phd - thesis bielefeld university ( 2006 ) h. t. ding , a. francis , o. kaczmarek , f. karsch , h. satz and w. sldner , hep - lat/1107.0311 a. francis , o. kaczmarek , m. laine , j. langelage , hep - lat/1109.3941 d. banerjee , s. datta , r. gavai , p. majumdar , hep - lat/1109.5738 | spectral representation vector current relates to invariant mass spectrum dileptons photons small frequencies determines transport coefficient electrical conductivity temperatures heavy ion experiments non - perturbative techniques mandatory determination quantities perturbative studies vector spectral functions inclusion non - perturbative aspects thermal loop resummation scheme break down low invariant mass region infrared divergent euclidean correlator infinite electrical conductivity spectral function at low invariant masses increases linearly finite electrical conductivity quark gluon plasma established previous work lattice qcd analyzed vector correlation function @xmath1 extrapolation to continuum limit lattice sizes obtained reliable results spectral properties extraction dilepton rates transport coefficients report extension to wider temperature range results electrical conductivity temperature region @xmath0 desired information encoded in large distance region temporal euclidean correlation functions vector current at non - zero temperature fixed spatial momentum current - current correlation functions represented integral over spectral functions denote @xmath5 sum three space - space components spectral function introduce vector spectral function @xmath6time - time component vector correlation function @xmath7 conserved proportional to quark number susceptibility @xmath8 vector correlation functions @xmath9 differ by constant at high temperature large energies corrections free field calculated perturbatively vector spectral function deduced from loop corrections to results thermal dilepton rate yields @xmath12 infinite temperature limit spatial spectral function contains @xmath13-function origin protected by conservation smeared at finite temperature low energy part described by breit - wigner peak limit @xmath15 sensitive to transport properties thermal medium leads to electrical conductivity @xmath16 breit - wigner form yields @xmath17 infinite temperature limit width breit - wigner peak vanishes @xmath18 electrical conductivity infinite non - interacting case ansatz describing high temperature vector spectral function : @xmath20 depends on four temperature parameters quark number susceptibility strength width breit - wigner peak parameter @xmath24 deviations spectral function at large energies ansatz extract electrical conductivity vector spectral function from correlator datavector correlation function calculate curvature largest euclidean time separation non - zero temperature @xmath25 curvature second thermal moment spectral functions vanishing momentum @xmath26 @xmath27 even odd moments vanish thermal moments give taylor expansion coefficients correlation function mid - point euclidean time interval @xmath28 infinite temperature free field limit integral eq evaluated first three non - vanishing moments massless quarks @xmath29 thermal moments sensitive smeared @xmath13-function @xmath32 contribution suppressed higher order moments analyze ratio @xmath33 free field correlator @xmath34 @xmath35 mid - point subtracted correlation functions @xmath36 curvature ratios mid - point determines deviation ratios thermal moments free field values ratios correlation functions differ in @xmath38 @xmath39 channels additional constant @xmath40 constant drops out in subtracted correlation function @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 calculation vector correlation functions lattices size @xmath44cols="^,^^",options="header discuss consequences findings vector spectral function invoke breit - wigner+continuum ansatz in eq. fit to @xmath45 @xmath46 data thermal moments analyze dependence fit parameters on @xmath47 large lattice effects expect large errors from fit - window parameters summarized in tab. fit - tdep results at @xmath48 @xmath49 largest errors closest to continuum furthest distance points free of lattice effects without continuum extrapolation discern residual deviation due lattice cut - off decreasing @xmath47 leads to systematic trends in parameters correction term @xmath50 width @xmath51 increase with decreasing @xmath47 electrical conductivity decreases @xmath52 increases with decreasing @xmath47 lower quality fit with lower @xmath47 lattice effects influence fit with smaller @xmath47 ansatz attribute largest part systematic trends to lattice effects correction factor @xmath24 most accurately determined shows increasing trend with decreasing temperature differing factor @xmath53 between @xmath46 and @xmath54@xmath24 coupled to strong coupling via @xmath55 behavior expected same for width @xmath56 parameter @xmath57 slightly increase with decreasing temperature remain within errors increase between @xmath46 and @xmath54 small leads to small deviations electrical conductivity results at @xmath58 differ @xmath59 from @xmath60 deviation @xmath61 for @xmath62 @xmath58 lattice affected by systematics fit largest deviation origins there electrical conductivity constant within @xmath63 across temperature region values at individual temperatures have fit errors around @xmath64 in temperature range @xmath0 results imply electrical conductivity depends linearly on temperature @xmath65 value : @xmath66 first error corresponds to temperature effects second to fit errors results on vector correlation in high temperature phase of quenched qcd in temperature range @xmath0 results similar behavior @xmath67 @xmath54 no contribution to @xmath68-resonance calculations continuum extrapolation relevant spectral properties to calculate electrical conductivity transport coefficient linearly on temperature with value of @xmath69relation electrical conductivity diffusion constant compare results charm diffusion @xcite momentum diffusion constant @xmath71 calculable @xcite upcoming publication -2pt h t. ding a. francis o kaczmarek f. karsch e laermann w. sldner francis overview references f. gelis blaizot. braaten pisarski karsch mustafa thoma arnold d. moore yaffe p. aurenche f. gelis moore zaraket s gupta g. aarts altherr p. aurenche aarts martinez resco petreczky d. teaney j hong teaney florkowski friman wilson lscher s sint r. sommer. u wolff s wissel phd - thesis bielefeld university 2006 t. ding a. francis o. kaczmarek f. karsch h. satz w. sldner hep - lat/1107.0311 francis kaczmarek m. laine j. langelage hep - lat/1109.3941. banerjee s datta r gavai p. majumdar lat/1109.5738 | 0.358076 | 2,526 | 1,264 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,297 | the effects of @xmath0 violating anomalous @xmath1 and @xmath2 vertices in @xmath3 production are determined .
we present the differential cross - section for @xmath4 with dependence on the spins of the @xmath5 bosons .
it is shown that from the different spin combinations those with one longitudinally and one transversally polarized @xmath5 in the final state are the most sensitive to @xmath0 violating anomalous couplings .
tzc desy 98163 + hep - ph/9810522 + october 1998 seeking @xmath0 violating couplings + in @xmath3 production at lep2 + jochen biebel _ desy zeuthen , + platanenallee 6 , d-15738 zeuthen , germany _ | lep2 runs now at energies above the @xmath3 production threshold and the first @xmath5 pairs are observed . during the run of lep2
some several hundred events will be collected .
this might be enough to provide limits for @xmath1 and @xmath2 vertices , which are absent in the standard model of electroweak interactions at tree - level .
however , physics beyond the standard model might give strong contributions to neutral gauge boson vertices @xcite .
( 40,30 ) requiring only invariance under lorentz transformations the most general @xmath6 vertex , see figure [ triplez ] , with two on - shell @xmath5 bosons is given by @xcite : @xmath7 .
\label{fvertex}\ ] ] in contrast to the @xmath8 vertex , with seven possible anomalous couplings @xcite , bose symmetry forbids more couplings in ( [ fvertex ] ) ) , if one additional @xmath5 boson is off - shell , but their contributions are suppressed by a factor @xmath9 . ] .
the anomalous parameter @xmath10 in ( [ fvertex ] ) leads to violation of @xmath11 and @xmath12 symmetry , but maintains invariance under @xmath0 transformations , while @xmath13 would introduce @xmath0 violation in ( [ fvertex ] ) .
the differential standard model cross - section for @xmath3 production in @xmath14 annihilation is known for almost 20 years @xcite .
also , the effects of anomalous neutral gauge boson couplings in the production of @xmath15 , @xmath3 , and @xmath16 bosons have been studied , see e.g. @xcite
. in @xmath17 production processes at the tevatron @xcite and lep @xcite , limits to the vertex @xmath18 were obtained .
however , they can not be transferred to @xmath5 pair production , since the anomalous couplings in equation ( [ fvertex ] ) are independent of couplings in @xmath17 production .
the differential cross - section for @xmath3 production is presented in this section .
it is obtained for the various spin combinations of final state @xmath5 bosons .
this allows to determine their sensitivity to the anomalous couplings .
the finite width effects of the produced @xmath5 bosons are considered by convoluting the cross - section for @xmath3 production with two breit - wigner functions .
the differential cross - section is then expressed by the sum : @xmath19 with @xmath20 where @xmath21 and @xmath22 stand for the possible @xmath5 boson helicities @xmath23 , @xmath24 , and @xmath25 , which are defined by the vectors : @xmath26 the klln function @xmath27 , the breit - wigner factors @xmath28 and other notations may be inferred from @xcite .
the squared matrix element @xmath29 in ( [ sigmadiff ] ) can be expressed by the standard model part @xmath30 and the anomalous contributions
@xmath31 : @xmath32 the squared amplitude in the standard model is : @xmath33 where the @xmath34 couplings @xmath35 and @xmath36 can again be taken from @xcite .
the functions @xmath37 are : @xmath38 with the mandelstam variables : @xmath39 it is noteworthy that the coupling constant combination @xmath40 gives additional contributions to equation ( [ msm ] ) .
however , these terms cancel each other for all measurable cross - sections and are therefore not reproduced bosons are identical , not all of the various spin combinations are observable by themselves . as an example , the contribution of @xmath41 can not be distinguished from @xmath42 and only their sum can be measured . ] .
the contributions from the anomalous diagrams are : @xmath43 with the coupling constants @xmath44 for the @xmath45 coupling .
the denominators of the @xmath46-channel propagators @xmath47 cancel with the corresponding factors in the anomalous vertex function ( [ fvertex ] ) .
photon and @xmath5 exchange have the same @xmath46-dependence in ( [ mss ] ) . again , as in equation ( [ msm ] ) terms with additional coupling constant combinations appear for the various spin combinations , but they do not contribute to physical observables .
the functions @xmath48 for the @xmath46-channel diagrams squared are : @xmath49)f_5^{v_k}f_5^{v_l}\right\ } , \\
{ \cal g}^{\pm\pm}_{s}(s_1,s_2)&= & \left(s_1-s_2\right)^2\sin^2\theta f_5^{v_k}f_5^{v_l } , \\ { \cal g}^{\pm0}_{s}(s_1,s_2)&= & { \cal g}^{0-}_{s}(s_2,s_1 ) , \\ { \cal g}^{\pm\mp}_{s}(s_1,s_2)&=&0 . \label{00s-}\end{aligned}\ ] ] similarly , the interferences @xmath50 between @xmath51 and @xmath52-channel diagram and the @xmath46-channel diagram can be expressed by : @xmath53 as expected there are no contributions of anomalous couplings to the spin combinations @xmath54 and @xmath55 .
these are spin 2 states and can not be produced by the @xmath46-channel diagrams .
equations ( [ 00s+ ] ) ( [ 00i- ] ) exhibit that the @xmath0 violating couplings proportional to @xmath13do neither interfere with the standard model terms nor with terms proportional to @xmath10 .
a further conclusion is that it is impossible to separate out the effects of the parameters @xmath56 and @xmath57 on the differential cross - section of the process @xmath4 .
however , both parameters imply @xmath0 violation in a @xmath6 vertex . in the limit of on - shell @xmath5 pair production
only the combination with one longitudinally and one transversally polarized @xmath5 receives contributions from anomalous couplings . with the given expressions for the various spin combinations ,
the differential cross - section ( [ sigmasummed ] ) is obtained : @xmath58 with the functions @xmath59 -\lambda(s+\sigma)\sin^2\theta\right\ } , \\
\sum_{v_k , v_l= \gamma , z}\!\!\frac{l_{v_k}l_{v_l}+r_{v_k}r_{v_l}}{4s_1s_2m_z^4}\left\ { \lambda ( 1+\cos^2\theta ) \left [ s\sigma f_4^{v_k}f_4^{v_l } + ( s\sigma-8s_1s_2 ) f_5^{v_k}f_5^{v_l } \right ] \label{asdef } \right.\\ & & \mbox{}\left .
\hphantom{\frac{l_{v_k}l_{v_l}+r_{v_k}r_{v_l}}{4s_1s_2m_z^4 } } + ( s_1-s_2)^2\left [ \lambda\sin^2\theta f_4^{v_k}f_4^{v_l } + 16s_1s_2f_5^{v_k}f_5^{v_l}\right ] \right\},\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the abbreviation @xmath60 is used .
the standard model part is described by @xmath61 while the anomalous contributions are contained in @xmath62 and @xmath63 . in the standard model limit the differential cross - section in ( [ comp ] )
is in agreement with the result presented in @xcite .
radiative corrections to ( [ comp ] ) due to initial state radiation , see e.g. @xcite , can be applied in the structure function approach including a lorentz boost of the scattering angle as described similarly in @xmath64 pair production @xcite .
the presented analytical results demonstrate how potential anomalous couplings change the differential @xmath3 production cross - section .
anomalous couplings will have their main effect in the production of a longitudinally and a transversally polarized @xmath5 boson . for on - shell @xmath3 production ,
these are the only spin combinations which are sensitive to an anomalous signal . effects of non - vanishing @xmath13 and @xmath10 on the final states with two transversally or two longitudinally polarized @xmath5 bosons are zero or are suppressed by a factor @xmath65 . therefore , a measurement of the final state spins might be used to increase the ratio of the anomalous signal over the standard model background .
but , since only one type of spin combinations is sensitive to anomalous couplings , a spin analysis can not be used to disentangle the signals from @xmath13 and @xmath10 . however , due to the interference contribution of @xmath10 in ( [ 0pi+ ] ) and ( [ pi+0 ] ) , the anomalous parameters @xmath13 and @xmath10 show different angular distributions and it might be possible to separate out their effects at lep2 . * acknowledgment
* + i would like to thank t. riemann for many useful discussions and suggestions .
in addition , i am grateful to t. hebbeker and p. molnr for drawing my attention to the problem , to j. alcaraz for numerical comparisons and to w. lohmann for providing me with information about the current experimental situation . finally , i am also grateful to j. illana and t. riemann for carefully reading the manuscript . p. mery , m. perrottet , and f. m. renard , _ z. phys . _
* c38 * ( 1988 ) 579591 ; + f. m. renard , _ nucl .
* b196 * ( 1982 ) 93 ; + u. baur and e. l. berger , _ phys . rev .
_ * d41 * ( 1990 ) 1476 ; + u. baur and e. l. berger , _ phys .
_ * d47 * ( 1993 ) 48894904 ; + f. cornet , r. graciani , and j. i. illana , `` bounds on the @xmath66 couplings from hera '' , in _ proc . of the workshop on future physics at hera , 2526 sep 1995 , hamburg , germany _ , ( g. ingelman , a. de roeck , r. klanner , eds . ) , vol . 1 ,
pp . 208218 , desy , hamburg , 1996 .
collaboration , f. abe _ et .
_ , _ phys .
_ * 74 * ( 1995 ) 19411945 ; + d0 collaboration , s. abachi _ et .
_ , _ phys .
* 78 * ( 1997 ) 36403645 ; + d0 collaboration , b. abbott _ et .
_ , _ phys . rev . _
* d57 * ( 1998 ) 38173821 .
collaboration , m. acciarri _ et .
_ , _ phys .
_ * b412 * ( 1997 ) 201 ; + delphi collaboration , p. abreu _ et .
_ , _ phys .
_ * b423 * ( 1998 ) 194206 ; + l3 collaboration , m. acciarri _ et .
al . _ , `` study of anomalous @xmath67 and @xmath68 couplings at lep '' , cern preprint cern - ep-98 - 096 ( 1998 ) .
a. leike , `` semianalytic distributions in four fermion neutral current processes '' , in _ proc . of int .
workshop on perspectives for electroweak interactions in @xmath14 collisions , 58 feb .
1995 , tegernsee , germany _ ( b. kniehl , ed . ) , pp .
121130 , world scientific , singapore , 1995 . | lep2 runs above @xmath3 production threshold first @xmath5 pairs observed hundred events collected limits for @xmath1 @xmath2 vertices absent in standard model electroweak interactions beyond standard model might contributions to neutral gauge boson vertices invariance under lorentz transformations general @xmath6 vertex two on - shell @xmath5 bosons given by contrast @xmath8 vertex seven anomalous couplings symmetry forbids more couplings additional @xmath5 boson off - shell contributions suppressed by factor @xmath9 anomalous parameter @xmath10 leads to violation @xmath11 @xmath12 symmetry maintains invariance under @xmath0 transformations @xmath13 @xmath0 violation differential standard model cross - section for @xmath3 production @xmath14 annihilation known for 20 years effects of anomalous neutral gauge boson couplings in @xmath15 @xmath16 bosons studied @xmath17 production limits to vertex @xmath18 obtainedtransferred to @xmath5 production anomalous couplings independent @xmath17 differential cross - section @xmath3 production presented obtained for spin combinations @xmath5 bosons sensitivity to anomalous couplings finite width effects @xmath5 bosons cross - section @xmath3 with breit - wigner functions differential cross - section expressed by sum @xmath19 with @xmath20 possible @xmath5 boson helicities @xmath23 @xmath25 defined by vectors @xmath26 klln function @xmath27 breit - wigner factors @xmath28 inferred from @xcite matrix element @xmath29 expressed by standard model part @xmath30 anomalous contributions @xmath31 @xmath32 squared amplitude model @xmath33 @xmath34 couplings @xmath35 @xmath36 taken from @xcite functions @xmath37 @xmath38 mandelstam variables @xmath39 coupling constant combination @xmath40 gives additional contributions to equation terms cancel for cross - sections not reproduced not spin combinations observable contribution @xmath41 distinguished from @xmath42 sum measuredcontributions anomalous diagrams @xmath43 coupling constants @xmath44 @xmath45 coupling denominators @xmath46-channel propagators @xmath47 cancel factors anomalous vertex function fvertex photon @xmath5 exchange same @xmath46-dependence terms additional coupling constant combinations appear spin combinations contribute physical observables functions @xmath48 @xmath46-channel diagrams @xmath49)f_5^{v_k}f_5^{v_l}\right{\pm}_{s}(s_1,s_2)&\left(s_1-s_2\right)^2\sin^2\theta f_5^{v_k}f_5^{v_l }{\pm0}_{s}(s_1,s_2)&}(s_2}}(s_1,s_2) interferences @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52-channel diagram @xmath46-channel diagram expressed @xmath53 no contributions anomalous couplings spin combinations @xmath54 @xmath55 spin 2 states not produced @xmath46-channel diagramsequations 00s+ 00i- ] exhibit @xmath0 violating couplings interfere standard model terms terms @xmath10 impossible separate effects parameters @xmath56 @xmath57 on differential cross - section process @xmath4 both parameters imply @xmath0 violation in @xmath6 vertex @xmath5 pair production combination one longitudinally transversally polarized @xmath5 receives contributions anomalous couplings combinations differential cross - section sigmasummed ] ) obtained @xmath58 functions @xmath59 -\lambda(s+\sigma)\sin^2\theta\right_k_l_{v_k{v_l{4s_1s_2m_z^4}\lambda 1+\cos^2\theta\sigma f_4^{v_k}f_4^{v_l } s\sigma-8s_1s_2_5^{v_k}f_5^{v_l\hphantom{\frac{l_{v_k}l_+r{4s_1s_2m_z^4 } s_1-s_2)^2\left\lambda\sin^2\theta f_4^{v_k}f_4^{v_l } 16s_1s_2f_5^{v_k}f_5^{v_l}\right\nonumber\end{aligned} abbreviation @xmath60 standard model part @xmath61 anomalous contributions @xmath62 @xmath63 differential cross - section comp with @xcite radiative corrections comp initial state radiation applied structure function approach lorentz boost scattering angle @xmath64 production anomalous couplings change differential @xmath3 production cross - section anomalous couplings effect longitudinally transversally polarized @xmath5 boson @xmath3 production only spin combinations sensitive anomalous signal effects non - vanishing @xmath13 @xmath10 final states @xmath5 bosons zero suppressed by @xmath65 measurement final state spins increase ratio anomalous signal standard model background one spin combinations sensitive to anomalous couplings spin analysis disentangle signals from @xmath13 @xmath10due interference contribution @xmath10 0pi+ pi+0 anomalous parameters @xmath13 @xmath10 show different angular distributions separate effects at lep2 t. riemann discussions suggestions grateful to t. hebbeker p. molnr j. alcaraz comparisons w. lohmann information experimental situation grateful j. illana t. riemann reading manuscript p. mery m. perrottet f. m. renard . c38 ( 1988 ) 579591 renard b196 ( 1982 ) 93 u. baur e. l. berger phys . d41 ( 1990 ) 1476 ; u. baur e l. berger d47 ( 1993 ) 48894904 f. cornet r. graciani j. i. illana @xmath66 couplings from hera workshop future physics hera sep 1995 hamburg germany g. ingelman a. de roeck r. klanner eds vol . 1 pp . 208218 hamburg 1996 collaboration f. abe phys . 74 ( 1995 ) 19411945 collaboration s. abachi phys. 78 ( 1997 ) 36403645abbott . rev. d57 1998 ) 38173821 collaboration acciarri phys . b412 1997 ) 201 delphi collaboration abreu . b423 1998 ) 194206 l3 collaboration acciarri study anomalous @xmath67 @xmath68 couplings lep cern preprint - ep-98 - 096 1998 ) leike semianalytic distributions fermion neutral current processes workshop electroweak interactions @xmath14 collisions feb. 1995 tegernsee germany b. kniehl ed . pp . 121130 world scientific singapore 1995 | 0.428523 | 2,771 | 1,505 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,299 | in this paper we propose an asymptotic preserving scheme for a family of friedrichs systems on unstructured meshes based on a decomposition between the hyperbolic heat equation and a linear hyperbolic which not involved in the diffusive regime .
for the hyperbolic heat equation we use asymptotic preserving schemes recently designed in @xcite-@xcite . to discretize the second part we use classical rusanov or upwind schemes . to finish
we apply this method for the discretization of the @xmath0 and @xmath1 models which are widely used in transport codes . | we study the finite volume discretization of general linear hyperbolic systems with stiff source terms depending of a relaxation parameter @xmath2 , which admit an asymptotic diffusion limit .
this type of system occurs in many physical applications ( transport of particles , damped waves , electromagnetism , linearized gas dynamic , plasma physics ) or in biology , and poses some numerical difficulties .
the classical godunov - type discretizations ( upwind , rusanov or hll schemes ) are not efficient because the time and spatial steps are constrained by the relaxation parameter @xmath2 @xcite , @xcite , @xcite . to treat this problem s. jin , c. d. levemore @xcite-@xcite using the ideas of a. y. leroux @xcite , introduced the notion of asymptotic preserving schemes ( ap schemes ) which eliminate these constraints . to illustrate the advantage of asymptotic preserving discretizations
, we propose a simple numerical example .
we solve the hyperbolic heat equation @xmath3 with two schemes : the upwind scheme and the asymptotic preserving scheme @xcite .
this model is approached when @xmath2 is small by the following diffusion equation @xmath4 the initial data is given by @xmath5 with @xmath6 a gaussian function and @xmath7 .
the parameters are given by @xmath8 and @xmath9 .
the time discretization is explicit and the time step is the half of the stability limit time step .
the convergence errors are computed using the exact diffusion solution .
.table with numerical error and cpu time associated to the upwind and gosse - toscani schemes . [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] the tables ( [ tabp3111])-([tabp32])-([tabp34])-([tabp35])-([tabp36 ] ) give the order of convergence for some meshes and some values of @xmath2 .
the remarks introduced on the convergence results of the asymptotic preserving scheme for the @xmath10 model are valid for this test case .
now we solve the @xmath11 and @xmath12 systems with @xmath13 and @xmath14 for @xmath15 @xcite .
the `` diffusive '' part is approximated with the jl-(b ) nodal scheme .
the time discretization is implicit .
this test case is described in @xcite .
the final time is @xmath16 . of the solution fundamental for the @xmath12 model at the time @xmath17 , right @xmath18 for the fundamental solution for the @xmath11 model at the time @xmath17,title="fig : " ] of the solution fundamental for the @xmath12 model at the time @xmath17 , right @xmath18 for the fundamental solution for the @xmath11 model at the time @xmath17,title="fig : " ] the exact solution is composed of dirac functions with the velocities @xmath19 ( @xmath19 are the eigenvalues of @xmath20 ) and smooth functions between the dirac functions . at
the beginning the smooth functions are non negatives and becomes negatives for large time . for the @xmath12 system ,
the speed wave is @xmath21 and for the @xmath11 system the maximal velocity is approximately @xmath22 .
the numerical results reproduce this behavior , see figure [ pnt2 ] .
this test case is an example of a complicated geometry .
we consider a checker - board with different scattering and absorbing opacities on a lattice core ( see @xcite ) .
it is interesting for neutron transport simulations since is a simplification to a reactor core .
the geometry is given in the figure [ geometry ] .
\times\left[0,7\right]$ ] ] we define @xmath23 the scattering opacity and @xmath24 the absorption opacity . in the black square and
the striped squares @xmath25 and @xmath26 . in the white squares @xmath8 and @xmath27 . the relaxation parameter is defined @xmath28 in the whole domain .
all the unknowns are equal to zero at the time @xmath29 .
we solve the @xmath12 and @xmath11 systems with the additional source term @xmath30 where @xmath31 , @xmath32 and @xmath33 are the matrices associated to the @xmath12 or @xmath11 system and @xmath34 with @xmath35 a kronecker product .
the source @xmath36 in the black square and @xmath37 in the rest of the domain .
+ the @xmath11 systems is solved using the jl-(b ) scheme for the `` diffusive '' part .
we plot the first moment with a logarithmic scale @xmath38 at the final time @xmath39 . model and plot the @xmath40 of the first moment @xmath18 . in the right
, we solve the @xmath11 model and plot the @xmath40 of @xmath18.,title="fig : " ] model and plot the @xmath40 of the first moment @xmath18 . in the right
, we solve the @xmath11 model and plot the @xmath40 of @xmath18.,title="fig : " ] the results for @xmath12 and @xmath11 are given for the first moment in figures [ fond11 ] .
they are the same as those in @xcite-@xcite .
we have studied the discretization on distorted meshes of linear hyperbolic systems with stiff source .
we have proposed a method called `` diffusive - non diffusive '' decomposition which consists to split the hyperbolic system between the hyperbolic heat equation and a other system which is negligible in the diffusion regime . using an asymptotic preserving scheme for the hyperbolic heat equation to discretize the `` diffusive '' part and a classical scheme to discretize the other part
, we obtain an asymptotic preserving method for the complete system . for the approximation of transport equation
, we use this decomposition for the simplified models as @xmath0 or @xmath1 approximations . for the @xmath0 systems the decomposition is natural . since the first and second moments gives the limit regime .
the others moments are close to @xmath2 .
the high order moments are added only to obtain a better approximation in the pure transport regime ( @xmath26 ) . for the @xmath1 models , we remark that the diagonalized model admits a structure very close to the structure of the @xmath0 models .
the `` diffusive - non diffusive '' decomposition gives consistent schemes for all the regimes . if the numerical methods used to discretize the different parts of the decomposition are stable in norm @xmath41 , the method is stable in norm @xmath41 . modifying the schemes for the `` non diffusive '' part we can obtain a semi - implicit scheme with a cfl condition independent of @xmath2 .
however this method is not optimal for the discretization of @xmath1 models , since our numerical method does not preserve the positivity . in the future , it would be interesting to design positive and asymptotic preserving method . c. berthon , j. dubois , b. dubroca , t .- h .
nguyen - bui , r. turpault , _ a free streaming contact preserving scheme for the @xmath43 model _ , advances in applied mathematics and mechanics adv .
mech . , 3 ( 2010 ) , pp .
259 - 285 . c. buet ,
b. desprs , e. franck , _ an asymptotic preserving scheme with the maximum principle for the @xmath43 model on distorded meshes _ ,
sci . , paris , sr .
, vol 350 , n 11 - 12 p. 633
- 638 , juin 2012 c. buet , b. desprs , e. franck , _ asymptotic preserving finite volumes discretization for non - linear moment model on unstructured meshes _ , finite volumes for complex applications vi problems , perspectives , springer proceedings in mathematics volume 4 , 2011 , pp 467 - 474 c. chalons , f. coquel , e. godlewski , p. a. raviart , n. seguin _ godunov - type schemes for hyperbolic systems with parameter - dependent source : the case of euler system with friction _ , math .
models methods appl .
20 , 2109 ( 2010 ) y. coudire , j. p. vila , and p. villedieu .
_ convergence dun schma volumes finis explicite en temps pour les systmes hyperboliques linaires symtriques en domaines borns_. c.r .
paris , sr .
i , math . , 331:95 - 100 , 2000 .
n. crouseilles , m. lemou _ an asymptotic preserving scheme based on a micro - macro decomposition for collisional vlasov equations : diffusion and high - field scaling limits _ , kinetic and related models 4 , 2 ( 2011 ) 441 - 477 e. franck , p. hoch , g. samba , p. navarro _ an asymptotic preserving scheme for @xmath12 model using classical diffusion schemes on unstructured polygonal meshes _ esaim : proceedings , october 2011 , vol .
31 , p. 56 - 75 .
l. gosse _ transient radiative transfer in the grey case : well - balanced and asymptotic - preserving schemes built on cases s elementary solutions _ journal of quantitative spectroscopy and radiative transfer 112 ( 2011 ) 1995 - 2012 .
s. jin , _ asymptotic preserving ( ap ) schemes for multiscale kinetic and hyperbolic equations : a review _ , lecture notes for summer school on methods and models of kinetic theory ( m and mkt ) , porto ercole ( grosseto , italy ) , juin 2010 . | study finite volume discretization linear hyperbolic systems stiff source terms depending relaxation parameter @xmath2 asymptotic diffusion limit system occurs physical applications gas dynamic plasma physics biology poses numerical difficulties classical godunov - type discretizations not efficient time spatial steps constrained relaxation parameter @xmath2 s. jin c d. levemore introduced asymptotic preserving schemes eliminate constraints propose numerical example solve hyperbolic heat equation @xmath3 two schemes upwind scheme asymptotic preserving scheme @xcite model approached @xmath2 small diffusion equation @xmath4 initial data given by @xmath5 @xmath6 gaussian function @xmath7 parameters given by @xmath8 @xmath9 time discretization explicit time step half stability limit time step convergence errors computed exact diffusion solution.table numerical error cpu time upwind gosse - toscani schemescols="^,^",options="header " tables ( tabp3111[tabp32 ] give order convergence for meshes values of @xmath2 remarks on convergence results asymptotic preserving scheme @xmath10 model valid for test case solve @xmath11 @xmath12 systems with @xmath13 @xmath14 for @xmath15 @xcite diffusive part approximated with jl-(b ) nodal scheme time discretization implicit test case described in @xcite final time is @xmath16 solution fundamental for @xmath12 model @xmath17 @xmath18 dirac functions with velocities @xmath19 eigenvalues of @xmath20 ) smooth functions between dirac functions smooth functions non negatives negatives for large time @xmath12 system speed wave is @xmath21 @xmath11 system maximal velocity approximately @xmath22 numerical results reproduce behavior see figure pnt2 ] test case example complicated geometry checker - board with scattering absorbing opacities on lattice core @xcite interesting for neutron transport simulations simplification to reactor coregeometry in figure define @xmath23 scattering opacity @xmath24 absorption opacity black square striped squares @xmath25 @xmath26 white squares @xmath8 @xmath27 relaxation parameter defined @xmath28 domain unknowns equal to zero time @xmath29 solve @xmath12 @xmath11 systems with additional source term @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath33 matrices associated to @xmath12 system @xmath34 @xmath35 kronecker product source @xmath36 black square @xmath37 rest domain @xmath11 systems solved jl-(b ) scheme diffusive part plot first moment logarithmic scale @xmath38 final time @xmath39 model plot @xmath40 first moment @xmath18 solve @xmath11 model plot @xmath40 @xmath18 results for @xmath12 @xmath11 first moment in figures same as @xcite- studied discretization on distorted meshes of linear hyperbolic systems with stiff source proposed method diffusive - non diffusive decomposition split hyperbolic system between hyperbolic heat equation other system negligible in diffusion regimeasymptotic preserving scheme hyperbolic heat equation diffusive part classical scheme other part method complete system transport equation decomposition simplified models @xmath0 @xmath1 approximations @xmath0 systems decomposition natural first second moments limit regime close to @xmath2 high order moments added better approximation pure transport regime @xmath26 ) @xmath1 models diagonalized model admits structure close to @xmath0 models diffusive - non diffusive decomposition consistent schemes regimes numerical methods stable norm @xmath41 method stable @xmath41 modifying schemes non diffusive part semi - implicit scheme cfl condition independent @xmath2 method not optimal discretization @xmath1 models preserve positivity future design positive asymptotic preserving method c. berthon j. dubois dubroca nguyen - bui turpault free streaming contact preserving scheme @xmath43 model advances applied mathematics mechanics mech 3 ( 2010 ) 259 - 285 c. buet desprs e. franck asymptotic preserving scheme maximum principle @xmath43 model distorded meshes sci . parisvol 350 11 12 633 - 638 juin 2012 buet desprs franck asymptotic preserving finite volumes non - linear moment model unstructured meshes complex applications proceedings mathematics volume 4 2011 467 - 474 chalons coquel godlewski raviart seguin godunov - type schemes hyperbolic systems parameter - dependent source euler system friction math models methods 2109 2010 coudire vila villedieu convergence volumes hyperboliques paris math 331:95 - 100 2000 crouseilles lemou asymptotic preserving scheme micro - macro decomposition collisional equations high - field scaling kinetic models 4 2011 ) 441 - 477 franck hoch samba navarro asymptotic preserving scheme @xmath12 model classical diffusion schemes unstructured polygonal meshes proceedings october 2011 31. 56 - 75 gosse transient radiative transfer grey case - balanced asymptotic - preserving schemes solutions quantitative spectroscopy radiative transfer 112 2011 )jin asymptotic preserving schemes multiscale kinetic hyperbolic equations review lecture notes summer school kinetic theory porto ercole grosseto italy juin 2010 | 0.34725 | 2,163 | 1,092 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,302 | we develop an iterative version of the singular value decomposition ( isvd ) that jointly analyzes a finite number of data matrices to identify signals that correlate among the rows of matrices .
it will be illustrated how the supervised analysis of a big data set by another complex , multi - dimensional phenotype using the isvd algorithm could lead to signal detection . | the joint analysis of different types of big data should provide a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying cancers @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . in this work
we introduce an approach that involves the use of matrix factorizations such as the singular value decomposition ( svd ) to simultaneously analyze a finite number of matrices by iteratively identifying cross - correlations between them . the iterative singular value decomposition ( isvd )
jointly analyzes a finite number of data matrices by automatically identifying any correlations that may exist among the rows of matrices , or the rows and columns of any one of the matrices . since big data sets contain many distinct signals that associate the measured variables and samples , repeated application of the isvd on re - normalized data iteratively detects these signals as orthogonal correlations among the matrices or within a single matrix
this approach is computationally efficient .
the following notation is used in this work .
* notation : * * @xmath0 the linear space of real column vectors with @xmath1 coordinates . * @xmath2 the linear space of real @xmath3 matrices . *
@xmath4 the subset of @xmath5 real orthonormal matrices . * @xmath6 the subset of @xmath3 real non - negative diagonal matrices . * @xmath7 the subset of @xmath3 real matrices whose @xmath8 columns are normalized .
the singular value decomposition of a matrix @xmath9 is the decomposition of @xmath10 into the product of three matrices of the form @xmath11 where @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and @xmath14 .
the diagonal entries of @xmath15 are called the singular values of @xmath10 , and columns of @xmath16 and @xmath17 are called left and right singular vectors of @xmath10 respectively .
the left - singular vectors are eigenvectors of @xmath18 and right - singular vectors are eigenvectors of @xmath19 .
non - zero singular values of @xmath10 are same as the square roots of non - zero eigenvalues of @xmath18 ( which are the same as the non - zero eigenvalues of @xmath19 ) . based on the svd , the matrix @xmath10 can be written as an outer product of orthogonal rank one approximations @xmath20 where @xmath21 and @xmath22 are the @xmath23th columns of @xmath16 and @xmath17 respectively ; @xmath24 is the @xmath23th diagonal element of @xmath15 . given a set of @xmath25 matrices @xmath26 with full column rank .
the svd of stacked matrix @xmath27 will be given by @xmath28 the @xmath29th column of @xmath30 can be written as @xmath31 where @xmath32 .
if @xmath33 represent the @xmath29th ( @xmath34 ) columns of @xmath35 , then @xmath36 can be viewed as correlation detectors of the signal @xmath33 that is common to @xmath37 .
that is , we can detect the rows of @xmath37 that are mutually correlated with the common signal @xmath33 by applying thresholds to the vectors @xmath36 .
note that the above procedure will result in @xmath8 distinct signals that link the rows of @xmath37 via the common signals @xmath33 .
the analysis of the rows of @xmath37 will be based on @xmath35 .
specifically , given the rank one approximation to the data we form the residual data and apply rank one approximation to the residual data pair .
this procedure is iterated until the largest singular value of residue falls below a certain threshold that is near zero .
this algorithm is based on the svd of the stacked matrix @xmath27 .
define @xmath38 ( @xmath39 ) to be the @xmath23th column of matrix @xmath35 ( @xmath30 ) and @xmath24 be the @xmath23th diagonal entry of matrix @xmath15 in ( [ eq : svd ] ) .
the first column of @xmath30 can be written as @xmath40 where @xmath41 .
the rank one approximation to svd of @xmath27 is given as @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 with @xmath46 @xmath47 we are interested to find the support of signals in @xmath37 .
the vectors @xmath48 in the rank one approximation of @xmath37 can be viewed as detectors of the signal in @xmath37 , respectively .
that is , the components of @xmath49 with large absolute magnitude correspond to the rows in @xmath37 that are highly correlated with @xmath50 .
note that @xmath51 is common in the matrix factorization of @xmath37 .
the indices of @xmath49 with large absolute magnitude are the signal support for @xmath37 respectively .
we apply the universal threshold proposed by donoho and johnstone ( @xcite and @xcite ) to detect components of @xmath49 with large absolute magnitude .
now we subtract @xmath52 from @xmath37 respectively and get the rank one approximation to svd of the pair @xmath53 .
it is shown in theorem @xmath54 that @xmath55 the rank one approximation to svd of @xmath53 is given as @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath44 @xmath58 with @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 similarly to the first iteration , the signals in @xmath62 are detected .
the sequential application of the isvd is continued until the maximum singular value of @xmath63 drops below a predefined threshold indicating that the noise floor of the data has been reached .
the number of iterations is at most rank of @xmath27 .
therefore , the isvd algorithm is computationally efficient and enhances signal detection by rank one approximation . to get the largest singular value and singular vector of @xmath10 we can use the matlab command @xmath64 . for further information about the algorithm of finding a few eigenvalue of a large matrix
please refer to @xcite .
* theorem 1 : * let the svd of the stack matrix be @xmath65 then , splitting apart the first column of @xmath30 , we can write @xmath66 satisfying @xmath67 let @xmath68 which latter equality holds since @xmath69 the claim is that * the nonzero eigenvalues of @xmath70 are @xmath71 , * the nonzero eigenvalues of @xmath72 are @xmath73 , * with the corresponding eigenvalues @xmath74 , so that the above representation of @xmath75 is its singular value decomposition .
* proof : * the proof is in the calculation @xmath76 and similarly @xmath77 , etc . the algorithm proceeds to find @xmath78 satisfying @xmath79 * theorem 2 : * let @xmath80 be an @xmath81 unit vector and @xmath82 be a set of orthonormal vectors .
define two matrices @xmath83 ( @xmath84 ) and @xmath85 ( @xmath86 ) as follows @xmath87 and @xmath88 where the support of @xmath89 and @xmath90 in @xmath10 are @xmath91 and @xmath92 respectively and the support of @xmath89 in @xmath85 is @xmath93 .
define @xmath75 as the stack of two matrices @xmath83 and @xmath85 @xmath94 it is claimed that * @xmath95 and @xmath92 are the eigenvalues of @xmath96 corresponding to eigenvector @xmath89 and @xmath90 respectively . * if @xmath97 then @xmath98 and @xmath99 are the eigenvectors of @xmath96 corresponding to eigenvalue @xmath97 . proof : @xmath100 @xmath101 by multiplying @xmath89 to both sides of ( [ eq1 ] ) @xmath102 similarly for @xmath90 .
suppose @xmath97 , by multiplying @xmath89 to both sides of ( [ eq1 ] ) @xmath103 @xmath104 similarly for @xmath99 .
* theorem 3 : * let @xmath105 be an @xmath81 unit vector and @xmath106 be a set of i.i.d .
white noise vectors , in which @xmath107 is a @xmath81 vector .
define the matrices @xmath10 ( @xmath108 ) as follows @xmath109 it is claimed that * @xmath1 is the approximate eigenvalues of @xmath110 corresponding to eigenvector @xmath105 for a non - trivial range of signal to noise ratio .
proof : [ eq : eq1111 ] a^ta & = s+n_1 & & s+n_m & n_m+1 & & n_p s^t+n_1^t + + s^t+n_m^t + n_m+1^t + + n_p^t + & = ss^t+n_1s^t+sn_1^t+n_1n_1^t + & + & + ss^t+n_ms^t+sn_m^t+n_mn_m^t + & + n_m+1n_m+1^t++n_pn_p^t by multiplying @xmath111 from right hand side to both sides of ( [ eq : eq1111 ] ) [ eq : eq2222 ] a^ta = s+ it is easy to see that if s or [ eq : eq22221 ] then the right hand side of ( [ eq : eq2222 ] ) can be approximated by @xmath105 .
it is noticeable that if @xmath112 , then with a high probability the inequality in ( [ eq : eq22221 ] ) is satisfied . below the convergence behaviour of @xmath113 as @xmath1 grows
is studied . by taking limit from both sides of ( [ eq : eq2222 ] ) we have [ eq : eq222222 ] a^ta = s+=s by law of large number we have [ eq : eq3333 ] pr(=0)=1 from ( [ eq : eq222222 ] ) and ( [ eq : eq3333 ] ) we can have almost surely [ eq : eq4444 ] a^ta = s therefore almost surely for any given @xmath114 there exists an @xmath115 such that for all @xmath116 [ eq : eq5555 ] |a^ta - s| < and almost surely [ eq : eq6666 ] m(s- ) < a^tas <
m(s+ ) . from chebychev s inequality [ eq : eq6666 ] p(|_i=1^mn_i|
> ) = let @xmath117 be the weakest signal to noise ratio that thresholding strategy works , @xmath118 .
[ eq : eq6666 ] p(|_i=1^mn_i| > ) = = what is the critical @xmath117 ?
critical @xmath117 can be achieved from roc curve and donoho johnson threshold . for critical @xmath117
we can find an upper bound on probability of error for any value of error .
the maximum probability of error is a function of signal to noise ratio , because the critical @xmath117 is a function of signal to noise ratio and @xmath1 is the power of signal .
the isvd algorithm is able to detect signals that are common or unique in finite number of data sets .
signals are detected sequentially based on signal strength .
very weak signals with small singular values are detectable since noise background is systematically reduced relative to signal strength . note that the isvd is computationally feasible in situations where the gsvd is not
. it may also be theoretically more meaningful than the generalized singular value decomposition ( gsvd ) @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . a zeinalzadeh , t wenska , g okimoto , integrated analysis of multiple high - dimensional data sets by joint rank-1 matrix approximations , 54th ieee conference on decision and control ( cdc ) , pp . 38523857 , 2015 .
g okimoto , a zeinalzadeh , t wenska , m loomis and etc . ,
joint analysis of multiple high - dimensional data types using sparse matrix approximations of rank-1 with applications to ovarian and liver cancer , biodata mining 9 ( 1 ) , 24 , 2016 .
s. p. ponnapalli , m. a. saunders , c. f. van loan , orly alter , a higher - order generalized singular value decomposition for comparison of global mrna expression from multiple organisms , science , 6(12 ) , 2011 . | joint analysis of big data understanding molecular mechanisms cancers @xcite approach matrix factorizations singular value decomposition ( svd ) to analyze finite matrices identifying cross - correlations singular value decomposition isvd ) analyzes finite data matrices correlations among rows matrices big data sets contain signals repeated application isvd on re - normalized data detects signals as orthogonal correlations among matrices approach computationally efficient notation used @xmath0 linear space of real column vectors with @xmath1 coordinates @xmath2 space @xmath3 matrices @xmath4 @xmath5 orthonormal matrices @xmath6 @xmath3 non - negative diagonal matrices @xmath7 @xmath3 matrices @xmath8 columns normalized singular value decomposition of matrix @xmath9 is decomposition of @xmath10 into product of three matrices form @xmath11 diagonal entries of @xmath15 singular values of @xmath10 columns of @xmath16 and @xmath17 left and right singular vectors of @xmath10left - vectors @xmath18 right - @xmath19 non - zero values @xmath10 same as square roots non - @xmath18 matrix @xmath10 outer product orthogonal rank one approximations @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23th columns of @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath24 @xmath23th diagonal element @xmath15 @xmath25 matrices @xmath26 full column rank svd stacked matrix @xmath27 given @xmath28 @xmath29th column @xmath30 written as @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath29th columns of @xmath35 @xmath36 correlation detectors signal @xmath33 common to @xmath37 detect rows @xmath37 correlated with common signal @xmath33 applying thresholds to vectors @xmath36 @xmath8 signals rows @xmath37 via common signals @xmath33 analysis rows @xmath37 based on @xmath35 form residual data apply rank one approximation pair until largest value residue below threshold near zero algorithm based on svd stacked matrix @xmath27define @xmath38 @xmath39 ) @xmath23th column matrix @xmath35 @xmath24 @xmath23th diagonal entry matrix @xmath15 first column @xmath30 @xmath40 @xmath41 rank one approximation svd @xmath27 @xmath42 @xmath46 @xmath47 support signals @xmath37 vectors @xmath48 @xmath37 detectors signal @xmath37 components @xmath49 large absolute magnitude correspond rows @xmath37 correlated @xmath50 @xmath51 common matrix factorization @xmath37 indices @xmath49 large absolute magnitude signal support @xmath37 apply universal threshold donoho johnstone detect components @xmath49 large absolute magnitude subtract @xmath52 from @xmath37 rank one approximation svd pair @xmath53 theorem @xmath54 @xmath55 rank one approximation svd @xmath53 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath44 @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 signals @xmath62 detected sequential application until maximum singular value @xmath63 drops below threshold noise floor data reached number iterations most rank @xmath27isvd algorithm efficient enhances signal detection largest singular value vector @xmath10 use matlab command @xmath64 information large matrix refer @xcite theorem 1 svd stack matrix @xmath65 splitting column @xmath30 write @xmath66 satisfying @xmath67 @xmath68 equality since @xmath69 nonzero eigenvalues @xmath70 are @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 corresponding eigenvalues @xmath74 representation @xmath75 singular value decomposition proof calculation @xmath76 @xmath77 algorithm @xmath78 satisfying @xmath79 theorem 2 @xmath80 @xmath81 unit vector @xmath82 orthonormal vectors define matrices @xmath83 @xmath85 @xmath87 @xmath88 support @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath10 are @xmath91 @xmath92 support @xmath89 @xmath85 @xmath93 define @xmath75 stack two matrices @xmath83 @xmath85 @xmath95 @xmath92 eigenvalues of @xmath96 eigenvector @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 eigenvectors of @xmath96 eigenvalue @xmath97@xmath100 multiplying @xmath89 sides @xmath102 @xmath90 @xmath97 multiplying @xmath89 sides @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath99 theorem 3 @xmath105 @xmath81 unit vector @xmath106 white noise vectors @xmath107 @xmath81 vector define matrices @xmath10 @xmath108 @xmath109 @xmath1 approximate eigenvalues @xmath110 eigenvector @xmath105 non - trivial signal to noise ratio proof eq eq1111 ] a^ta s+n_1 s+n_m n_m+1 n s^t+n_1^t s^t+n_m^t n_m+1^t n_p^t ss^t+n_1s^t+sn_1^t+n_1n_1^t ss^t+n^t+sn_m^t+n_mn_m^t n_m+1n_m+1^t++n_pn_p^t multiplying @xmath111 right side both sides eq eq1111 eq2222 ] a^ta = s+ s eq eq22221 right hand side approximated @xmath105 @xmath112 high probability inequality eq eq22221 satisfiedconvergence behaviour @xmath113 @xmath1 grows studied limit both sides eq : eq2222 ] a^ta = s+=s law large number eq : eq3333 ] pr(=0)=1 almost eq : eq4444 ] a^ta = s @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath116 [ eq : eq5555 ] |a^ta - s| < eq : eq6666 ] m(s- ) < a^tas < m(s+ ) chebychev s inequality eq : eq6666 ] @xmath117 weakest signal to noise ratio thresholding strategy @xmath118 critical @xmath117 achieved from roc curve donoho johnson threshold upper bound probability error maximum probability error function signal to noise ratio critical @xmath117 function signal noise ratio @xmath1 power signal isvd algorithm signals common or unique finite data sets signals detected sequentially based signal strength weak signals small singular values detectable noise background reduced relative signal strength isvd computationally feasible situations gsvd not meaningful generalized singular value decomposition @xcite zeinalzadeh wenska okimoto integrated analysis high - dimensional data sets rank-1 matrix approximations 54th ieee conference decision control pp 38523857 2015 okimoto wenska loomis joint analysis high - dimensional data sparse matrix approximations rank-1 applications ovarian liver cancer biodata mining 9 ( 1 2016 ponnapalli saunders van loan alter higher - order generalized singular value decomposition comparison global mrna expression organisms science 6(12 ) 2011 | 0.42699 | 2,811 | 1,536 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,304 | we propose a method to realize a robust quantum random number generator based on bosonic stimulation . a particular implementation that employs weak coherent pulses and conventional avalanche photo - diode detectors ( apds )
is discussed . | random numbers are crucial for various tasks , among them generating cryptographic secret keys , authentication , monte - carlo simulations , digital signatures , statistical sampling , etc .
random number generators can be classified into two types : pseudo - random number generators ( prng ) @xcite and true random number generators ( trng ) .
a prng is an algorithm , computational or physical , for generating a sequence of numbers that approximates the properties of random numbers .
a physical or hardware version is typically based on stochastic noise or chaotic dynamics in a suitable physical system @xcite .
computational prngs are based on computational algorithms that generate sequences of numbers of very long periodicity , making them look like true random numbers for sufficiently short sequences .
careful observation over long periods will in principle reveal some kind of pattern or correlation , suggestive of non - randomness . as far as is known today , the inherent indeterminism or fluctuations in quantum phenomena is the only source of true randomness , an essential ingredient in quantum cryptography @xcite .
various proposed underlying physical processes for quantum random number generators ( qrngs ) include : quantum measurement of single photons @xcite , an entangled system @xcite , coherent states @xcite or vacuum states @xcite ; phase noise @xcite , spin noise @xcite , or radioactive decay or photonic emission @xcite .
in this work , we propose a novel method of qrng that is a quite different indeterministic paradigm from the above two .
it uses _ bosonic stimulation _ to randomly amplify weak coherent pulses to intense pulses that can be easily detected by a conventional apds .
bosons ( integer - spin quantum particles ) obey bose - einstein statistics , which entails that the transition probability of a boson into a given final state in enhanced by the presence of identical particles in that state .
if there are @xmath0 particles in a given quantum state , the probability that an incoming boson makes a transition into that state is proportional to @xmath1 .
this effect is called bosonic stimulation , and is responsible for coherent matter wave amplification in atomic lasers , as well as the sustenance of a particular mode in a laser cavity , whereby the presence of photons in a particular lasing mode stimulates the emission of more photons into that mode .
it provides a new way to combine quantum indeterminism with the tendency of bosons to congregate indistinguishably .
we may call this qrng a _ random bosonic stimulator_. perhaps the practical merit of our proposed qrng , apart from its harnessing a novel version of quantum indeterminism , is that it simplifies the detection module to the point where it may be accessible to an advanced undergraduate laboratory .
consider an urn with @xmath2 blue balls and @xmath3 red balls .
a ball is picked at random and replaced with @xmath4 balls of the same color or @xmath5 balls of different color .
the addition of same color balls results in positive feedback whereas that of different color balls results in negative feedback . during a run of trials , the fractional population of each urn
may initially fluctuate randomly , but eventually settles down to a randomly selected _ limiting value _
@xmath6 , giving an instance of symmetry breaking ( figure [ fig : graph ] ) .
let the initial population of two states labelled as blue " and red " be @xmath7 and @xmath8 , respectively . as the incoming balls start populating the two states , the subsequent growth in population of the modes exhibits plya urn behaviour .
the probabilistic law of evolution of the fractional population at @xmath9th instance is given by bosonic stimulation to be @xmath10 .,width=453 ] the limiting value @xmath11 for large @xmath9 itself varies randomly in the range @xmath12 $ ] from run to run , having a beta distribution @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the beta function that normalizes @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 . for bosonic stimulation , the shifts @xmath20 .
if the seeding is symmetric , then so is the asymptotic distribution of the limiting values , thereby restoring symmetry , as it should be @xcite .
depending on the number of trial runs , the final state can have an arbitrarily large number of bosons . depending on whether @xmath21 ( blue dominates ) or @xmath22 (
red dominates ) , one generates a random bit 0 or 1 .
this can serve as the basis of generating random bits at a rate determined by the frequency with which each run can be repeated .
thus , the phenomenon of bosonic stimulation acts as a macroscopic qrng .
a concrete idea for realizing a random bosonic stimulator is to use a lasing medium that supports two radiation modes , for example by vertical and horizontal polarization of the same frequency @xcite .
a scheme of the proposed experiment is given in figure [ fig : rng ] .
two equal intensity , highly attenuated modes of coherent states are input into a lasing medium . to ensure that the two inputs are synchronized and of equal intensity , a calibrated mach - zehnder set - up is used with an attentuated coherent laser pulse fed into one of its input ports .
this results in an ouput consisting of two ( unentangled ) coherent pulses with half the intensity .
a quarter wave plate in one of the arms ensures that the polarization in one arm rotated to be 90@xmath23 with respect to the other .
each mode in a pulse corresponds to a ball color in the plya urn problem .
because of bosonic stimulation , the output intensity will randomly favor vertical or horizontal polarization .
let @xmath24 ( @xmath25 ) denote the intensity of the outcoming light in the horizontal ( vertical ) polarization mode .
with horizontal polarization and average photon number @xmath26 enters the experiment .
the upper arm branch is rotated to vertical polarization by the quarter - wave plate qwp .
the product state @xmath27 enters the lasing medium , where the @xmath28 and @xmath29 modes participate in bosonic stimulation . in the symmetric case ,
the detector complex generates a 0 or 1 bit depending on whether @xmath30 or the converse , where @xmath31 are intensities of the horizontal and vertical polarization output components.,width=377 ] the incoming photon emitted as a result of the coherent de - excitation of the atoms in the medium is assumed to be equally coupled to both modes .
suppose the two modes start in the state @xmath32 , where the first register corresponds to the ` blue ' mode and the second to the ` red ' mode .
further let the series of atoms in the population - inverted state be in the initial excited state @xmath33 . by giving up a photon into the blue or red mode ( which could be angular momentum states ) ,
the atom is left in the state @xmath34 or @xmath35 , assumed to be mutually orthogonal .
the joint system of the modes and atoms evolves in a manner analogous to a quantum walk , given by : @xmath36 and so on .
each term in the superposition is rendered incoherent because it is entangled with a distinct state of atoms , and thus the probability for scattering into a given urn state is quantitatively the same as the classical plya urn situation . because of the entanglement with the polarization degrees of freedom of the atoms ( eq .
( [ eq : nieuw ] ) ) , the state of the atoms bears an imprint of the final outcome of laser light .
however , as the laser atoms are not individually accessible , the random bit generated is practically unique .
from the view point of monte - carlo simulations , etc .
, only the randomness from the laser light read - out will be used . from a cryptographic perspective
, the laser system will remain physically well within the encoder unit , preventing its access to a malevolent eavesdropper .
assuming that any possible information leakage through side - channels ( like heat radiations from the laser ) are reasonably blocked out to the outside world , the assumption of practical uniqueness of the generated randomness applies here , too .
a random bit @xmath37 is generated by the detector module , depending on which mode dominates , for example , according to the recipe : @xmath38 the mean and variance of the distribution @xmath39 are given , respectively , by @xmath40 the value @xmath6 obtained will tend to peak towards the mean , with ever lower variance if one or both of the initial populations are large . if the instrument function of the detector is denoted by a normal distribution @xmath41 with fwhm @xmath42 ,
the observed distribution is the convolution @xmath43 .
it is important that we use sufficiently weak pulses obtained by attenuating coherent light sources , so that @xmath44 .
this ensures that the quantum randomness dominates over stochastic noise in the detector s reading . the distribution @xmath45 is uniform over @xmath12 $ ] , and thus the performance of the random bosonic stimulator is least affected by detector tolerance
this means that the two inputs should ideally be vacuum modes .
a challenge will be to ensure that the beam splitters are truly 50 - 50 and the coupling of the excited atoms is equal to the two modes .
however , even if this is not so , eq . ( [ eq : beta ] ) and the prescription ( [ eq : rbit ] ) can be suitably generalized to yield a random bit of uniform distribution .
suppose a photon couples to the @xmath29 mode stronger than to the @xmath28 mode ( because of an atomic or beam - splitter feature ) by a factor @xmath46 , then the new distribution can be shown to be eq .
( [ eq : beta ] ) , but with @xmath47 .
let @xmath48 be the median of the distribution @xmath15 , defined such that @xmath49 , where @xmath15 is the beta distribution ( [ eq : beta ] ) .
then , we obtain our uniformly random bit by replacing prescription ( [ eq : rbit ] ) by : @xmath50 to be precise , the above numbers assume that the input modes are pure number states .
more realistcally , taking into account that they are coherent states , we must replace eq .
( [ eq : beta ] ) by @xmath51 where @xmath52 is the poisson distribution of @xmath37 with mean @xmath53 .
furthermore , in practice we may have to let @xmath53 to range over an interval because of practical difficulties of producing the same exact degree of attentuation on each run .
it can be shown that this added complication does not affect our main results . for sufficiently low noise in each run , two bits
may also be generated per run according to the recipe : @xmath54 where @xmath55 is defined such that @xmath56 .
more generally , to generate @xmath57 bits , the noise level should be lower than @xmath58 .
we have proposed a novel qrng principle , based on bosonic stimulation , in which , while the state preparation procedure presents experimental challenges , the detection and read - out parts are easier to implement . in an actual experiment , it is possible that systematic experimental biases might introduce correlations into the sequence of bits produced , thereby degrading the randomness .
statistical analyses like the diehard tests and national institute of standards and testing ( nist ) suite of tests for randomness have to be carried out to know the quality of randomness and improve upon it .
some implementational details are worth noting .
since the required light is not for communication to a geographically distant station , any laser system that can be conveniently tuned to operator at 800 nm , where good detectors ( apds ) are available , is suitable for our purpose .
a good candidate is femtosecond titanium - sapphire lasers , for which pulse repetition rates upto a few gigahertz can be obtained .
further , the potential problem posed by the cavity s unequal coupling to the two modes can taken care of by `` biasing '' the comparator ( as clarified above ) .
care must be taken to choosing the operational / differential amplifier ( op amp ) ic designed to work as comparator , so that their frequency specifications are appropriate for the pulse rate of the laser .
even with the low resolution provided by two - bit comparators , for a titanium - sapphire laser , mentioned above , this yields a random bit - rate of the order of @xmath59 bits per second , which is comparable to bit - rates in state - of - the - art qrngs .
the present method of generating randomness is based on the essentially quantum feature of being able to turn a distinct bosonic particle into an indistinguishable part of a collective object , which is the mode or a condensate .
the notion of identity in classical logic and philosophy is as such incapable of handling this situation , requiring recourse to concepts like quasi - set theory @xcite .
we think that , as in the case of the application of quantum nonlocality to cryptography @xcite , our method of generating randomness based on bosonic indistinguishability , can perhaps be termed as another instance of _ applied philosophy _ !
here we have presumed the axiomatic indeterminism of quantum mechanics .
this assumption would be falsified if a ( nonlocal ) hidden variable theory were able to explain quantum mechanics in the future .
as this seems unlikely , a qrng still seems the best bet for a source of genuine and unique randomness .
miesner , h. j. , stamper - kurn , d. m. , andrews , m. r. , durfee , d. s. , inouye , s. and ketterle , w. science , 279 ( 1998 ) , 1005 .
the nalanda dialogs on _ individuation and identity _ : http://nalanda-dialogforum.org a. k. ekert .
67 , 661 ( 1991 ) . | random numbers crucial for tasks generating cryptographic keys authentication monte - carlo simulations digital signatures statistical sampling random number generators classified into two types pseudo - random and true random generators prng algorithm for generating sequence properties random numbers physical version based on stochastic noise or chaotic dynamics in system computational prngs on algorithms generate sequences long periodicity look like true random numbers for short sequences observation over long periods reveal pattern correlation suggestive of non - randomness inherent indeterminism in quantum phenomena only source of true randomness essential in quantum cryptography proposed processes for quantum random number generators include measurement of photons entangled system coherent states vacuum states phase noise spin noise radioactive decay photonic emission novel method of qrng different indeterministic paradigm uses bosonic stimulation to amplify weak coherent pulses to intense pulses detected bosons obey bose - einstein statistics transition probability of boson into final state enhanced by presence of identical particles@xmath0 particles in quantum state probability incoming boson proportional to @xmath1 effect bosonic stimulation responsible for coherent matter wave amplification in atomic lasers sustenance of particular mode in laser cavity presence stimulates emission more photons new quantum indeterminism with bosons congregate qrng _ random bosonic stimulator_ simplifies detection module accessible to advanced undergraduate laboratory consider urn with @xmath2 blue @xmath3 red balls ball picked replaced with @xmath4 same or @xmath5 different color addition same color balls results positive feedback different color balls negative feedback trials fractional population of each urn fluctuate randomly settles to randomly selected limiting value @xmath6 symmetry breaking ( figure initial population of two states blue red be @xmath7 and @xmath8 incoming balls populating states subsequent growth in population exhibits plya urn behaviour probabilistic law of evolution of fractional population at @xmath9th instance given by bosonic stimulation to @xmath10 .=453 limiting value @xmath11 @xmath9 varies randomly range @xmath12 from run to run beta distribution @xmath13 @xmath14 beta function normalizes @xmath15 bosonic stimulation shifts @xmath20 if seeding symmetric asymptotic distribution limiting values restoring symmetry @xcite trial runs final state arbitrarily large number of bosons @xmath21 blue or @xmath22 red dominates generates random bit 0 or 1 basis generating random bits rate determined by frequency each run bosonic stimulation acts as macroscopic qrng idea random bosonic stimulator use lasing medium two radiation modes vertical and horizontal polarization same frequency scheme proposed experiment in figure two equal intensity attenuated modes of coherent states input into lasing medium inputs calibrated mach - zehnder set - up used attentuated coherent laser pulse fed input results in ouput two unentangled coherent pulses with half intensity quarter wave plate ensures polarization arm 90@xmath23 each mode in pulse corresponds to ball color in plya urn problembosonic stimulation output intensity vertical or horizontal polarization @xmath24 ( @xmath25 denote intensity outcoming light horizontal polarization mode horizontal polarization average photon number @xmath26 enters experiment upper arm branch rotated to vertical polarization by quarter - wave plate product state @xmath27 enters lasing medium @xmath28 @xmath29 modes participate bosonic stimulation detector complex generates 0 or 1 bit @xmath30 or @xmath31 intensities horizontal vertical polarization output components incoming photon de - excitation atoms equally coupled to both modes two modes start in state @xmath32 first register blue second red ' mode atoms in population - inverted state initial excited state @xmath33 giving up photon into blue or red mode atom left in state @xmath34 or @xmath35 mutually orthogonal joint system modes atoms evolves to quantum walk each term superposition incoherent entangled with distinct state atoms probability for scattering into urn state same as classical plya urn situation entanglement with polarization degrees freedom atoms state atoms final outcome laser lightlaser atoms not accessible random bit generated unique - carlo simulations only randomness from laser light read - out used cryptographic perspective laser system within encoder unit preventing access malevolent eavesdropper information leakage heat radiations blocked assumption practical uniqueness of generated randomness applies random bit @xmath37 generated by detector module depending on mode dominates recipe @xmath38 mean and variance of distribution @xmath39 given by @xmath40 value @xmath6 peak towards mean lower variance if initial populations large instrument function detector by normal distribution @xmath41 with fwhm @xmath42 observed distribution is convolution @xmath43 important use weak pulses attenuating coherent light sources @xmath44 quantum randomness dominates over stochastic noise distribution @xmath45 uniform over @xmath12 $ performance random bosonic stimulator least affected by detector tolerance two inputs should be vacuum modes challenge to ensure beam splitters 50 - 50 coupling of excited atoms equal to two modes eq . beta and prescription ( : rbit ] ) can generalized to yield uniform distributionphoton couples to @xmath29 mode stronger than @xmath28 atomic beam - splitter feature by factor @xmath46 new distribution eq . ( eq : beta ] ) with @xmath47 @xmath48 median of distribution @xmath15 @xmath49 @xmath15 is beta distribution obtain uniformly random bit by replacing prescription eq : rbit ] ) by @xmath50 assume input modes pure number states replace eq . beta ) by @xmath51 @xmath52 is poisson distribution of @xmath37 with mean @xmath53 @xmath53 range over interval difficulties producing same attentuation each run complication affect main results low noise run two bits generated per run recipe @xmath54 @xmath55 defined @xmath56 to generate @xmath57 bits noise level lower than @xmath58 proposed novel qrng principle bosonic stimulation state preparation procedure challenges detection and read - out parts easier implement experimental biases introduce correlations into sequence bits randomness statistical analyses like diehard tests national institute of standards and testing tests for randomness to quality of randomness improveimplementational details noting required light not for communication to distant station laser system tuned to operator at 800 nm good detectors available suitable good candidate is femtosecond titanium - sapphire lasers pulse repetition rates upto few gigahertz potential problem by cavity s unequal coupling to two modes by biasing comparator care choosing operational / differential amplifier comparator frequency specifications appropriate for pulse rate laser low resolution two - bit comparators for titanium - sapphire laser yields random bit - rate @xmath59 bits per second comparable to state - - art qrngs present method of generating randomness based on quantum feature distinct bosonic particle into indistinguishable part of collective object mode condensate notion of identity in classical logic philosophy incapable recourse to quasi - set theory method generating randomness based bosonic indistinguishability applied philosophy presumed axiomatic indeterminism of quantum mechanics assumption falsified if nonlocal hidden variable theory explain quantum mechanics future unlikely qrng best bet for genuine unique randomness miesner , h. j. stamper - kurn , d.m. andrews. durfee d s. inouye ketterle science 279 1998 1005 nalanda dialogs individuation identity http://nalanda-dialogforum.org ekert 67 661 1991 ) | 0.504605 | 2,965 | 1,475 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,333 | we show that , contrary to common belief , dijkstra s self - stabilizing mutual exclusion algorithm on a ring @xcite also stabilizes when the number of states per node is one less than the number of nodes on the ring .
* keywords * : distributed computing , fault tolerance , self - stabilization . | in @xcite , dijkstra presents the following mutual exclusion protocol for a ring of nodes @xmath0 where each node can read the state @xmath1 \in \set{0}{k-1}$ ] of its anti - clockwise neighbour , and where node @xmath2 runs a different program than the other nodes .
node @xmath2 , privileged when @xmath3=x[n]$ ] @xmath3=x[n]$ ] @xmath3 \assign ( x[0 ] + 1 ) \bmod k$ ] node @xmath4 , @xmath5 , privileged when @xmath6 \neq x[i-1]$ ]
@xmath6 \neq x[i-1]$ ] @xmath6 \assign x[i-1]$ ] dijkstra proves self - stabilization of this protocol to a configuration where only one node is privileged at a time , for @xmath7 under a central daemon and says @xcite : `` for smaller values of @xmath8 , counter examples kill the assumption of self - stabilization '' .
failing to find a counter example for @xmath9 , we instead found the following proof that the system also stabilizes when @xmath9 , provided that @xmath10 .
we first define the legitimate configurations as those configurations that satisfy @xmath6=a$ ] for all @xmath4 with @xmath11 and @xmath6=(a-1 ) \bmod k$ ] for all @xmath4 with @xmath12 for some choice of @xmath13 and @xmath14 .
hence the configuration where all nodes have the same state is legitimate .
dijkstra already showed ( independent of any restriction on @xmath8 ) closure of the legitimate states , that no run of the protocol ever terminates , and that in each of these runs the exceptional node will change state ( aka `` fire '' ) infinitely often .
let @xmath10 .
consider the case where node @xmath2 fires for the first time .
then just before that , @xmath3=x[n]=b$ ] for some @xmath15 and the new value of @xmath3 $ ] becomes @xmath16 .
now consider the case when node @xmath2 fires again .
then just before that , @xmath3=x[n]=b+1 $ ] . in order for node @xmath17 to change value from @xmath15 to @xmath16 ,
it must have copied @xmath16 from its anti - clockwise neighbour @xmath18 $ ] ( which exists if @xmath10 ) .
this moment must have occurred after node @xmath2 changed state to @xmath3=b+1 $ ] .
but then , just after node @xmath17 copies @xmath16 from node @xmath19 we actually have @xmath18=x[n]=x[0]=b+1 $ ] . in other words , if @xmath10 , three different nodes hold the same value @xmath16 .
then the remaining @xmath20 nodes can each take a different value from the remaining @xmath21 values ( unequal to @xmath16 ) , which means that if @xmath22 ( so in particular when @xmath9 ) at this point in time there is a value @xmath13 ( among these @xmath21 values ) not occurring as the state of any node on the ring . because node @xmath2 fires infinitely often , eventually @xmath3 $ ] becomes @xmath13 . because the other nodes merely copy values from their anti - clockwise neighbours , at this point no other node holds @xmath13 .
the next time node @xmath2 fires , @xmath23=x[0]=a$ ] .
the only way that node @xmath17 gets the value @xmath13 is if all intermediate nodes have copied @xmath13 from node @xmath2 .
we conclude that for nodes , @xmath6=a$ ] , which is a legitimate state . | @xcite dijkstra presents mutual exclusion protocol for nodes @xmath0 each state @xmath1{k-1} anti - clockwise neighbour node @xmath2 runs different program node @xmath2 privileged when @xmath3=x[n]$\assign ( x[0 ] + 1 ) \bmod k$ node @xmath4 @xmath5 privileged when @xmath6 \neq x[i-1]$ x[i-1] dijkstra proves self - stabilization configuration one node privileged @xmath7 central daemon smaller values @xmath8 counter examples kill assumption self - stabilization counter example @xmath9 proof system stabilizes when @xmath9 @xmath10 legitimate configurations satisfy @xmath6=a$ ] @xmath4 @xmath11 @xmath6=(a-1 ) \bmod k$ ] @xmath4 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 configuration all nodes same state legitimate dijkstra showed closure legitimate states no run protocol terminates exceptional node state infinitely often @xmath10 consider case node @xmath2 fires first timebefore @xmath3=x[n]=b$ ] @xmath15 new value becomes @xmath16 consider when node @xmath2 fires @xmath3=x[n]=b+1 $ ] node @xmath17 to change value from to must copied @xmath16 from @xmath18 after @xmath2 changed to @xmath3=b+1 $ ] after @xmath17 copies @xmath16 from @xmath19 @xmath18=x[n]=x[0]=b+1 $ ] if @xmath10 three nodes hold same value @xmath16 remaining @xmath20 nodes take different value from @xmath21 values unequal to @xmath16 if @xmath22 value @xmath13 among not node node @xmath2 fires often @xmath3 becomes @xmath13 other nodes copy values from neighbours no other node holds @xmath13 next time node @xmath2 fires @xmath23=x[0]=a$ ] node @xmath17 gets value @xmath13 if all nodes copied @xmath13 from @xmath2 @xmath6=a$ ] legitimate state | 0.134159 | 857 | 473 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,336 | we present the study of k@xmath0and @xmath1 production performed with the alice experiment at the lhc in pb
pb collisions at @xmath2 tev and pp collisions at @xmath3 and 7 tev .
the k@xmath0and @xmath1 particles are reconstructed via their v0 decay topology allowing their identification up to high transverse momenta .
the corresponding baryon / meson ratios as a function of transverse momentum are extracted for pb
pb collisions in centrality bins and in the transverse momentum range from 1 to 6 gev/@xmath4 .
they are also compared with those measured in pp events at the lhc energies of 0.9 and 7 tev as well as in au
au collisions at @xmath5 and 200 gev from rhic . | one of the most interesting results obtained at rhic in au
au collisions was the observation that the baryon ( anti - baryon ) production at intermediate transverse momenta becomes comparable to that of mesons @xcite .
the topological decay reconstruction of k@xmath0and @xmath1 provides a unique opportunity to extend the baryon and meson identification to much larger transverse momenta than would be possible using conventional particle identification methods .
measurement performed by the star collaboration ( see , for example , @xcite ) , showed that the baryon / meson ratio reaches its maximum at @xmath6 gev/@xmath4 and starts decreasing at higher momenta .
the maximum value of the @xmath1/k@xmath0ratio in central collisions was found to exceed unity .
the question of why , in nucleus - nucleus collisions , baryons at intermediate @xmath7 appear to be more easily produced than mesons is still open .
possible explanations involve interplays between soft and hard mechanisms of particle production ( also at the partonic level ) like those discussed , for example , in ref .
the evolution of the baryon / meson ratio with collision energy may yield additional information about this `` baryon anomaly '' .
in this article , we present the @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios measured by the alice experiment at the lhc in 1.1@xmath810@xmath9 minimum bias pb pb events at @xmath10 tev as a function of transverse momentum and for different collision centrality bins , as well as in pp collisions at @xmath3 and 7 tev .
the alice experiment is well suited for k@xmath0and @xmath1 reconstruction over a wide momentum range . for the results discussed here
, the momentum range @xmath11 gev/@xmath4 is defined by our current level of understanding the systematic uncertainties .
the k@xmath0and @xmath1 particles were reconstructed via their v0 decay topology @xcite .
the method was the same for both pp and pb pb collisions .
the typical reconstruction efficiencies ( extracted from monte carlo studies ) were about 40 % for k@xmath0and 30 % for @xmath1 at @xmath12 gev/@xmath4 ( close to the @xmath1/k@xmath0maximum ) . in the momentum range
@xmath13 gev/@xmath4 , the variation of the ratio of the reconstruction efficiencies for k@xmath0and @xmath1 was no larger than 12 % .
the @xmath7 spectra of k@xmath0 obtained in centrality bins in pb
pb collisions were compared with the spectra of charged kaons reconstructed by the alice time projection chamber and the time of flight detector . at @xmath14 gev/@xmath4 ,
the two sets of spectra agreed within 12 % @xcite .
the spectra of @xmath1 were corrected for the contribution of @xmath1 s coming from decays of @xmath15 and @xmath16 .
this was done by re - scaling the corresponding distributions extracted from monte carlo simulations with the @xmath7 spectrum of @xmath15 reconstructed in real data , assuming that the number @xmath16 is proportional to the reconstructed number of @xmath15 .
the obtained feed - down corrections turned out to be of the order of 20 % and changed within only a few per cent as a function of event centrality and transverse momentum .
the efficiency and feed - down corrections were checked with the life - time distributions for the v0 particles .
these distributions were corrected as functions of two variables , @xmath7 and decay length .
this was done for all the event centrality bins separately .
the statistical error of the reconstructed life times for k@xmath0and @xmath1 was of the order of 1 % .
however , the systematic deviation from the corresponding nominal values was @xmath174 % in the case of the most central events . altogether , we considered the following main sources of systematic uncertainties , listed here along with their contributions to the overall uncertainty : signal extraction ( 3 % ) , efficiency correction ( 7 % for @xmath18 gev/@xmath4 , 1 % for @xmath19 gev/@xmath4 ) , feed - down correction ( 5 % ) , admixture of @xmath1 s generated in the detector material ( 2 % ) .
/k@xmath0ratios as a function of @xmath7 for different centralities in pb
pb collisions at @xmath10 tev , and also for minimum bias pp collisions at @xmath20 and 7 tev .
right : selected @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios shown on the left compared with those measured in au au collisions at @xmath21 gev .
[ fig1 ] , title="fig:",scaledwidth=47.0%,scaledwidth=37.0% ] /k@xmath0ratios as a function of @xmath7 for different centralities in pb
pb collisions at @xmath10 tev , and also for minimum bias pp collisions at @xmath20 and 7 tev .
right : selected @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios shown on the left compared with those measured in au au collisions at @xmath21 gev .
[ fig1 ] , title="fig:",scaledwidth=52.0%,scaledwidth=35.0% ] -2 mm the @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios as a function of @xmath7 for different centralities in pb pb collisions at @xmath10 tev are shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] ( left ) .
the same ratios for minimum bias pp events at 0.9 and 7 tev are also given .
the baryon / meson ratio in pp interactions always stays below 1 and is quite similar to what is observed in peripheral pb
pb collisions .
as the collision centrality increases , the baryon / meson ratio develops a maximum at @xmath12 gev/@xmath4 reaching a value of @xmath22 for the 05 % most central events .
comparing these preliminary @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios with those measured by the star collaboration in au au collisions at @xmath21 gev , we notice that , in the case of most central events , the baryon / meson ratio at the lhc decreases less rapidly with @xmath7 than at rhic ( see fig .
[ fig1 ] ( right ) ) .
the preliminary star data points @xcite shown in this figure are multiplied by the @xmath23 factor calculated from the data reported in @xcite ( to account for the non - unity of the anti - baryon / baryon ratio at rhic ) and subtracted a 10 % feed - down correction quoted in @xcite . a comparison between the maximum values of ( anti-)baryon / meson ratios measured by alice in pb pb collisions at @xmath10 tev and those obtained by star in au
au events at @xmath5 and 200 gev is presented in fig .
[ fig2 ] ( left ) .
the au au points at 62.4 gev are plotted as they are published in @xcite . to compare the star measurements at 200 gev with the alice results , we multiply the star values from @xcite by the same @xmath24 factor and apply the same feed - down correction as mentioned above . as is evident in fig .
[ fig2 ] ( left ) , the maximum value of the @xmath1/k@xmath0ratio increases with the beam energy . the position in @xmath7 of the @xmath1/k@xmath0maximum measured at pb pb collisions at @xmath10 tev is slightly shifted towards higher transverse momenta with respect to that observed in au au events at @xmath21 gev , as shown in the fig .
[ fig2 ] ( right ) .
/k@xmath0ratio as a function of number of participants compared between different colliding systems and energies .
right : position in @xmath7 of the @xmath1/k@xmath0maximum as a function of number of participants compared between pb pb at @xmath10 tev , pp at @xmath25 tev and au au at @xmath26 gev collisions .
[ fig2 ] , title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0%,scaledwidth=36.0% ] /k@xmath0ratio as a function of number of participants compared between different colliding systems and energies .
right : position in @xmath7 of the @xmath1/k@xmath0maximum as a function of number of participants compared between pb pb at @xmath10 tev , pp at @xmath25 tev and au au at @xmath26 gev collisions .
[ fig2 ] , title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0%,scaledwidth=36.0% ]
we have presented the measurements of @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios in pb
pb collisions at @xmath10 tev performed with the alice experiment at the lhc .
the ratios are compared to those measured by alice in pp collisions at @xmath27 and 7 tev as well as with the star results in au
au events at @xmath5 and 200 gev . in pb
pb collisions , the @xmath1/k@xmath0ratio as a function of the transverse momentum shows a broad maximum around @xmath12 gev/@xmath4 . the maximum value of the ratio increases with the collision centrality reaching the value of @xmath22 for the 0 - 5 % most central events .
as the collision centrality decreases , the maximum of the @xmath1/k@xmath0ratio becomes less pronounced and diminishes to a value of @xmath28 .
the same behaviour of the ratio is observed in pp events at @xmath20 and 7 tev which bracket in energy the pb
pb results reported here . comparison with similar measurements performed by the star collaboration in au
au collisions at @xmath5 and 200 gev shows that the value at the @xmath1/k@xmath0maximum increases with the beam energy . at the same time , the position of the maximum in @xmath7 shifts towards higher transverse momenta .
the magnitude of this shift is smaller than it was predicted , for example , in ref .
@xcite . however , the baryon enhancement in central nucleus - nucleus collisions at the lhc decreases less rapidly with @xmath7 and , at @xmath29 gev/@xmath4 , is a factor @xmath30 higher compared with that at rhic .
10 j. adams _ et al . _ [ star collaboration and star - rich collaboration ] , [ nucl - ex/0601042 ] . k. adcox _ et al . _
[ phenix collaboration ] , phys .
c * 69 * ( 2004 ) 024904 .
[ nucl - ex/0307010 ] .
m. a. c. lamont [ star collaboration ] , eur .
j. c * 49 * ( 2007 ) 35 .
r. j. fries , b. muller , eur . phys .
j. c * 34 * ( 2004 ) s279-s285 .
[ nucl - th/0307043 ] . | interesting at rhic collisions baryon production at intermediate momenta comparable to mesons @xcite topological decay reconstruction of k@xmath0and @xmath1 baryon meson identification to larger momenta measurement star collaboration baryon / meson ratio maximum at @xmath6 gev/@xmath4 at higher momenta maximum @xmath1/k@xmath0ratio in central collisions unity in nucleus - nucleus collisions baryons at intermediate @xmath7 produced than mesons explanations interplays between mechanisms particle production evolution of baryon / meson ratio with collision energy may @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios measured by alice experiment at 1.1@xmath810@xmath9 minimum bias events at @xmath10 tev function of transverse momentum different collision centrality bins pp collisions at @xmath3 and 7 tev alice experiment for k@xmath0and @xmath1 reconstruction over wide momentum range momentum range @xmath11 gev/@xmath4 defined by systematic uncertainties k@xmath0and @xmath1 particles reconstructed via v0 decay topology @xcitemethod same for pp pb collisions typical reconstruction efficiencies 40 % for k@xmath0and 30 % @xmath1 at @xmath12/@xmath4 in momentum range @xmath13/@xmath4 variation efficiencies for k@xmath0and @xmath1 no larger than 12 % @xmath7 spectra compared with spectra charged kaons by alice time projection chamber time of flight detector at @xmath14/@xmath4 spectra agreed within 12 % spectra @xmath1 corrected for contribution decays of @xmath15 @xmath16 by re - scaling distributions with @xmath7 spectrum @xmath15 reconstructed real data proportional to reconstructed feed - down corrections 20 % changed event centrality transverse momentum efficiency checked with life - time distributions for v0 particles distributions corrected as functions @xmath7 decay length for event centrality bins separately statistical error of reconstructed life times for k@xmath0and @xmath1 1 % systematic deviation from nominal values was @xmath174 % in most central eventsconsidered sources systematic uncertainties contributions : signal extraction 3 % ) efficiency correction ( 7 % @xmath18 1 % @xmath19 feed - down correction ( 5 % ) admixture @xmath1 s detector material ( 2 % )@xmath0ratios function @xmath7 for centralities pb pb collisions @xmath10 minimum bias pp collisions @xmath20 7 tev selected @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios collisions @xmath21 gev fig1@xmath0ratios function @xmath7 centralities pb pb collisions minimum bias pp collisions 7 tev @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios collisions @xmath21=35.0% @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios function @xmath7 centralities pb pb collisions @xmath10 tev shown fig same ratios for minimum bias pp events at 0.9 7 tev baryon / meson ratio in pp interactions below 1 similar to peripheral pb pb collisions collision centrality increases baryon / meson ratio maximum at @xmath12/@xmath4 @xmath22 for 05 % most central eventspreliminary @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios with star collaboration collisions at @xmath21 gev baryon / meson ratio at lhc decreases less with @xmath7 than rhic preliminary star data points @xcite multiplied by @xmath23 factor @xcite non - anti - baryon / ratio rhic subtracted 10 % feed - down correction comparison between anti-)baryon / meson ratios by alice in collisions at @xmath10 tev star events at @xmath5 and 200 gev presented in fig au au points at 62.4 gev plotted in @xcite compare star measurements at 200 gev with alice results multiply star values from @xcite by @xmath24 factor apply feed - down correction maximum value @xmath1/k@xmath0ratio increases with beam energy position @xmath7 of @xmath1/k@xmath0maximum at collisions at @xmath10 tev slightly shifted towards higher transverse momenta events at @xmath21 gev@xmath0ratio function of number of participants colliding systemsposition @xmath7 @xmath1/k@xmath0maximum function number participants compared between pb pb @xmath10 pp @xmath25 au au @xmath26 gev collisions fig2=48.0%.0% /k@xmath0ratio function number participants colliding systems energies position @xmath7 @xmath1/k@xmath0maximum function number participants pb pb pp au au @xmath26 gev collisions presented measurements @xmath1/k@xmath0ratios in pb pb collisions @xmath10 tev alice experiment lhc ratios compared to alice pp collisions @xmath27 7 tev star results au au events @xmath5 200 gev pb pb collisions @xmath1/k@xmath0ratio function transverse momentum maximum around @xmath12 gev/@xmath4 increases collision centrality @xmath22 collision centrality decreases maximum @xmath1/k@xmath0ratio less diminishes to @xmath28 same behaviour ratio in pp events @xmath20 and 7 tev energy pb pb resultscomparison measurements star collaboration collisions @xmath5 200 gev shows value @xmath1/k@xmath0maximum increases beam energy position maximum @xmath7 shifts towards higher transverse momenta magnitude smaller than predicted @xcite baryon enhancement central nucleus - nucleus collisions lhc decreases less @xmath7 @xmath29 gev@xmath4 factor @xmath30 higher rhic adams star collaboration - nucl - ex/0601042 ] adcox phenix collaboration phys * 69 * ( 2004 ) 024904 nucl - ex/0307010 ] lamont star collaboration * 49 * 2007 ) 35 fries muller j 34 * 2004 ) s279-s285 nucl - th/0307043 ] | 0.351278 | 2,564 | 1,314 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,342 | we have studied biomembranes with grafted polymer chains using a coarse - grained membrane simulation , where a meshless membrane model is combined with polymer chains .
we focus on the polymer - induced entropic effects on mechanical properties of membranes .
the spontaneous curvature and bending rigidity of the membranes increase with increasing polymer density .
our simulation results agree with the previous theoretical predictions . | cellular membranes in living cells are a complex and compound system , including various kinds of proteins and different lipid compositions .
some of them are `` decorated '' by sugar chains called glycoproteins or glycolipids @xcite . from theoretical and experimental aspects , pure lipid membrane in tensionless fluidic state
has extensively received much attention for a long time @xcite .
pioneer studies on the polymer - membrane compound system , especially on membrane with anchored polymers , have been recently reported by several groups both theoretically and experimentally @xcite .
they found that the mechanical properties of lipid membrane , such as the bending rigidity @xmath0 , the saddle - splay modulus @xmath1 , and the spontaneous curvature @xmath2 , can be dramatically changed by the interaction between membrane and the surrounding solvent and macromolecules @xcite .
liposomes decorated by grafted polymers ( peg etc . )
are often used for carriers in drug delivery systems @xcite .
thus , it is important to understand the effects of grafted polymers for both fundamental research and medical applications . in this paper
, we explain our simulation model and then briefly describe the effects of grafted polymers on membrane properties .
we employed a meshless membrane model with grafted polymer chains , since it allows large scale simulations and the mechanical properties of pure membranes are easy to control @xcite . for an isolated anchored polymer chain , the membrane properties have been investigated in details by using scaling analysis and partition function method @xcite .
here we focus on membranes with a high polymer density , where the interactions between polymer chains are not negligible and have significant effects .
in this work , we employ a coarse - grained lipid membrane grafted with a coarse - grained flexible linear polymer chain to form a grafted biomembrane system ( see fig .
[ fig : cart ] ) .
one membrane particle represents a patch of bilayer membrane , and possesses only transnational degree of freedom .
the particles form a quasi-2d membrane by a curvature potential based on moving least - squares ( mls ) method @xcite .
( ii ) polymer particles are linked by a harmonic potential , and freely move like a bead - spring behavior with a soft - core repulsion .
an end of each polymer chain is anchored on one membrane particle with the harmonic potential .
we consider a patch of membrane composed of @xmath3 membrane particles . among them , @xmath4 membrane particles are anchored by a polymer chain .
each polymer chain consists of @xmath5 polymer segments with a connected membrane particle .
the membrane and polymer particles interact with each other via a potential @xmath6 all particles have a soft - core excluded volume term with a diameter of @xmath7 . @xmath8f_{\rm { cut}}(r_{ij}/\sigma ) \label{rep}\ ] ] which @xmath9 is the distance between membrane ( or polymer ) particles @xmath10 and @xmath11 .
the diameter @xmath7 is used as the length unit , @xmath12 , and @xmath13 is a @xmath14 cutoff function @xmath15\right\ } & ( s < s_{\rm { cut } } ) \\ 0 & ( s \geqslant s_{\rm { cut } } ) \end{array } \label{cutoff } \right.\ ] ] with @xmath16 . the factor @xmath17 in eq .
@xmath18 is determined so that @xmath19 , which implies @xmath20 . in eq .
@xmath21 , we use the parameters @xmath22 , and @xmath23 .
the membrane potential @xmath24 consists of attractive and curvature potentials , @xmath25 where the summation is taken only over the membrane particles .
the attractive multibody potential is employed to mimic the `` hydrophobic '' interaction .
@xmath26\right\}-c , \label{att}\ ] ] which is a function of the local density of membrane particles @xmath27 with @xmath16 , @xmath28 [ satisfied with @xmath29 , and @xmath30 .
the constant @xmath31 $ ] is chosen so that @xmath32 at @xmath33 . here
we set @xmath34 in order to simulate 2d fluidic membrane . for @xmath35 ,
@xmath36 acts like a pairwise potential with @xmath37 . for @xmath38 ,
this potential saturates to the constant @xmath39 .
thus , it is a pairwise potential with a cutoff at higher densities than @xmath40 .
the curvature potential is given by the shape parameter called `` aplanarity '' , which is defined by @xmath41 with the determinant @xmath42 , the trace @xmath43 , and the sum of principal minors @xmath44 .
the aplanarity @xmath45 scales the degree of deviation from the planar shape , and @xmath46 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 are three eigenvalues of the weighted gyration tensor @xmath49 where @xmath50 . without loss of generality , we suppose @xmath51 . if @xmath46 is the minimum eigenvalue representing a relative deviation from the local plane patch formed by the neighbor membrane particles around , its corresponding eigenvector is collinear with the normal vector @xmath52 of this plane patch . when the @xmath10-th membrane particle has two or less neighbor particles within the cutoff distance @xmath53 , they could be localized on a certain plane , therefore @xmath54 . the mass center of local plane patch @xmath55 , where a gaussian @xmath56 cutoff function is employed to calculate the weight of the gyration tensor @xmath57 & ( r_{ij}<r_{cc } ) \\ 0 & ( r_{ij}\geqslant r_{\rm { cc } } ) , \end{array } \label{cutoff } \right . \label{weight}\ ] ] which is smoothly cut off at @xmath58 .
here we use the parameters @xmath16 , @xmath59 , and @xmath60 . the bending rigidity and the line tension of membrane edges
are linearly dependent on @xmath61 and @xmath62 , respectively , for @xmath63 , so that they can be independently varied by changing @xmath61 and @xmath62 , respectively . as described in the previous work @xcite , the aplanarity @xmath64 for the smallest eigenvalue @xmath65,@xmath48 .
locally a membrane patch can be expressed for small fluctuations in the monge representation as @xmath66 where @xmath67 and @xmath68 coordinates are set to the principal axes . @xmath69 and @xmath70 are the principal curvatures of the membrane patch . in the case of cylindrical membrane , @xmath71 and @xmath72 . by averaging over the local neighborhood with a weight function @xmath73 where @xmath74 , we have @xmath75 since @xmath76 , we easily know @xmath77
thus , a linear relation between the bending energy in helfrich s macroscopic model and our mesoscopic parameter is obtained as @xmath78 , which is numerically confirmed in the previous work @xcite .
the membrane has zero spontaneous curvature without polymers .
the details of this membrane model are described in ref .
@xcite . in each polymer chain ,
its polymer particles are connected by a harmonic potential . @xmath79 where the summation is taken only between neighboring particles in each polymer chain and between the end polymer particles and anchored membrane particles .
the harmonic potential is given by @xmath80 which @xmath81 is a kuhn length of polymer chain .
we choose @xmath82 here such that a polymer chain stays in the force - free state for @xmath83 .
the @xmath84 ensemble ( constant number of particles @xmath85 , volume @xmath86 , and temperature @xmath87 ) is used with periodic boundary conditions in a simulation box of dimensions @xmath88 .
the dynamics of both membrane and anchored flexible polymers are calculated by using underdamped langevin dynamics .
the motions of membrane and polymer particles are governed by @xmath89 where @xmath90 is the mass of a particle ( membrane or polymer particle ) and @xmath91 is the friction constant .
@xmath92 is a gaussian white noise , which obeys the fluctuation - dissipation theorem : @xmath93 where @xmath94 and @xmath95 is the thermal energy .
we use @xmath96 , @xmath97 , @xmath98 , and @xmath99 through this work .
front and lateral snapshots of a cylindrical membrane with anchored flexible polymers outside used for simulations .
it contains @xmath100 membrane particles and @xmath101 polymer chains.,width=294 ] a cylindrical membrane , composed of @xmath102 , with @xmath4 anchored polymers outside ( see fig .
[ fig : snap ] ) is used to estimate the polymer - induced spontaneous curvature and bending rigidity . for a cylindrical membrane with a radius @xmath103 and a length @xmath104 ,
the curvature free energy is given by @xmath105 da \nonumber \\ \label{eq : f_tube } & = & 2\pi rl_z \left [ \frac{\kappa}{2}\left ( \frac{1}{r } -c_0 \right)^2 \right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath69 and @xmath70 are the principal curvatures at each position on the membrane surface , and the membrane area @xmath106 .
the coefficients @xmath0 and @xmath1 are the bending rigidity and saddle - splay modulus , respectively .
biomembranes with lipids symmetrically distributing in both leaflets of the bilayer have zero spontaneous curvature @xmath107 .
the anchored polymer outside induces asymmetry to the membrane .
the bending energy of the membrane generates a shrinking force along the cylindrical axis , @xmath108 since a shorter cylinder membrane has a larger cylindrical radius , it has a lower bending energy .
previously , we clarified that this force can be used to estimate the spontaneous curvature @xmath109 and bending rigidity @xmath0 in simulations @xcite .
we calculated @xmath109 and @xmath0 for another meshless model , which has an orientational degree of freedom and can have a finite @xmath109 .
the obtained values of @xmath109 agree very well with those calculated from an alternative method using a curved membrane strip .
we define a polymer density @xmath110 to quantitatively describe the relation between the change of mechanical properties of membranes and the anchored polymer concentration . figures [ fig : fz ] shows the axial force @xmath111 calculated from the pressure tensor with different polymer densities .
the force @xmath111 increases linearly with @xmath112 .
thus , @xmath109 and @xmath0 of the grafted membranes can be estimated from the least squares fits to eq .
( [ eq : fz ] ) .
the obtained values of @xmath109 and @xmath0 are shown in figs .
[ fig : spcv ] and [ fig : bd ] , respectively . both quantities increase with increasing anchored polymer density .
this quantitatively agrees with the previous theory for a low polymer density .
when the membrane is curved in the opposite direction from the polymer grafting , the polymer chains have more space to move .
these entropic effects generate the spontaneous curvature of the membranes .
the details of our results and comparison with the theory will be described elsewhere @xcite .
we have studied the effects of grafted polymer on the membrane properties . anchored polymer chains
are added to a meshless membrane model .
the free energy of polymer chains is dominated by the entropic effects induced by the degree of freedom of polymer conformation .
we confirm that the induced spontaneous curvature and bending rigidity both increase as the polymer chain density increases .
anchored polymer chains also affect other properties of biomembranes ( it will be described in ref .
the properties and stability of membranes can be controlled by the decoration of membrane with grafted polymers .
we thank h. shiba for helpful discussions .
hw acknowledges the support by a mext scholarship ( japan ) . this study is partially supported by a grant - in - aid for scientific research on priority area `` molecular science of fluctuations toward biological functions '' from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science , and technology of japan .
e. sackmann , `` biological membranes architecture and function '' in _ structure and dynamics of membranes : i. from cells to vesicles _ , edited by r. lipowsky , and e. sackmann , north holland , amsterdam , 1995 , pp . 165 . | cellular membranes complex compound system including proteins lipid compositions decorated by sugar chains glycoproteins or glycolipids pure lipid membrane in tensionless fluidic state received attention studies on polymer - membrane compound system especially with anchored polymers reported mechanical properties of lipid membrane bending rigidity saddle - splay modulus spontaneous curvature changed by interaction between membrane solvent macromolecules liposomes decorated by grafted polymers used for carriers in drug delivery systems important to understand effects of grafted polymers for fundamental research medical applications simulation model describe effects of grafted polymers on membrane properties employed meshless membrane model with grafted polymer chains allows large scale simulations mechanical properties control for isolated anchored polymer chain membrane properties investigated scaling analysis partition function method focus on membranes with high polymer density interactions between polymer chains coarse - grained lipid membrane grafted with flexible linear polymer chain grafted biomembrane system fig one membrane particle represents patch of bilayer membrane transnational degree of freedomparticles form quasi-2d membrane by curvature potential moving least - squares method @xcite polymer particles linked by harmonic potential move like bead - spring behavior soft - core repulsion end polymer chain anchored on one membrane particle with harmonic potential patch of membrane @xmath3 membrane particles @xmath4 membrane particles anchored by polymer chain each polymer chain @xmath5 polymer segments connected membrane particle membrane polymer particles interact via potential @xmath6 particles have soft - core volume term diameter of @xmath7 distance between membrane particles @xmath10 and @xmath11 diameter @xmath7 length unit @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 cutoff function @xmath16 factor @xmath17 in eq @xmath18 determined @xmath19 implies @xmath20 @xmath21 use parameters @xmath22 @xmath23 membrane potential @xmath24 attractive and curvature potentials @xmath25 summation over membrane particles attractive multibody potential hydrophobic interaction@xmath26 function local density membrane particles @xmath27 @xmath16 @xmath29 constant @xmath31 chosen @xmath32 @xmath33 set @xmath34 simulate 2d fluidic membrane @xmath35 @xmath36 pairwise potential @xmath37 @xmath38 saturates constant @xmath39 pairwise potential higher densities @xmath40 curvature potential shape parameter aplanarity defined @xmath41 determinant @xmath42 trace @xmath43 sum principal minors @xmath44 aplanarity @xmath45 scales deviation from planar shape @xmath46 @xmath48 eigenvalues weighted gyration tensor @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath46 minimum eigenvalue relative deviation from local plane patch neighbor membrane particles eigenvector collinear with normal vector @xmath52 plane @xmath10-th membrane particle two or less neighbor particles cutoff distance @xmath53 localized certain plane @xmath54mass center local plane patch @xmath55 gaussian @xmath56 cutoff function calculate weight gyration tensor @xmath57 r_{ij}<r_{cc }_{ij\geqslant{ cc } }\end{array{cutoff{weight cut off @xmath58 parameters @xmath16 @xmath59 @xmath60 bending rigidity line tension membrane edges dependent @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 varied changing @xmath61 @xmath62 aplanarity @xmath64 smallest eigenvalue @xmath65,@xmath48 membrane patch expressed small fluctuations representation @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 coordinates principal axes @xmath69 @xmath70 principal curvatures membrane patch cylindrical membrane @xmath71 @xmath72 averaging local neighborhood weight function @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 linear relation bending energy helfrich s macroscopic model mesoscopic parameter obtained @xmath78 confirmed previous work @xcite membrane zero spontaneous curvature without polymers details described @xcite each polymer chain particles connected harmonic potential@xmath79 summation between particles polymer chain end polymer particles anchored membrane particles harmonic potential by @xmath80 @xmath81 kuhn length polymer chain choose @xmath82 polymer chain force - free state @xmath83 @xmath84 ensemble constant number particles volume temperature used periodic boundary conditions simulation box @xmath88 dynamics of membrane anchored flexible polymers calculated underdamped langevin dynamics motions membrane polymer governed by @xmath89 @xmath90 mass friction constant @xmath92 gaussian white noise fluctuation - dissipation theorem @xmath93 @xmath94 thermal energy use @xmath96 @xmath99 cylindrical membrane anchored flexible polymers simulations contains @xmath100 membrane particles @xmath101 polymer chains cylindrical membrane @xmath102 @xmath4 anchored polymers estimate polymer - induced spontaneous curvature bending rigiditycylindrical membrane radius @xmath103 length @xmath104 curvature free energy given by @xmath105 f_tube @xmath69 @xmath70 principal curvatures membrane surface membrane area @xmath106 coefficients @xmath0 @xmath1 are bending rigidity saddle - splay modulus biomembranes lipids symmetrically distributing leaflets zero spontaneous curvature @xmath107 anchored polymer outside induces asymmetry membrane bending energy generates shrinking force cylindrical axis shorter cylinder membrane larger radius lower bending energy force estimate spontaneous curvature @xmath109 bending rigidity @xmath0 simulations calculated @xmath109 @xmath0 for meshless model orientational degree freedom finite @xmath109 values agree with alternative method curved membrane strip define polymer density @xmath110 relation between change mechanical properties membranes anchored polymer concentration figures axial force @xmath111 calculated pressure tensor different polymer densities force @xmath111 increases linearly with @xmath112@xmath109 @xmath0 grafted membranes estimated from least squares to eq obtained values shown in figs and bd quantities increase with anchored polymer density agrees with previous theory for low polymer density membrane curved opposite direction from polymer grafting polymer chains have more space to move entropic effects generate curvature details results comparison described studied effects grafted polymer on membrane properties anchored polymer chains added to meshless membrane model free energy dominated by entropic effects freedom polymer conformation induced spontaneous curvature bending rigidity increase as polymer chain density increases anchored polymer chains affect properties biomembranes properties stability controlled by decoration membrane with grafted polymers thank h. shiba for discussions support mext scholarship japan study partially supported by grant - in - aid for scientific research molecular science of fluctuations biological functions from ministry of education culture sports science technology japan sackmann biological membranes architecture function structure dynamics of membranes cells vesicles north holland 1995 165 | 0.43501 | 2,746 | 1,368 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,365 | the discovery potential of the cms detector for the mssm neutral and charged higgs bosons at the lhc is presented based on studies with full detector simulation and event reconstruction of the principal discovery channels . | in the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) the electroweak symmetry is broken via the higgs mechanism , leading to five physical scalars : three neutral ( h , h , a ) and two charged ( h@xmath0 , h@xmath1 ) higgs bosons . at tree level , two parameters , usually chosen to be the mass of the pseudo scalar higgs boson ( @xmath2 ) and the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two higgs fields ( @xmath3 ) , determine the masses and couplings in the higgs sector .
radiative corrections , chiefly coming from the top - stop and , at large @xmath3 , from the bottom - sbottom sector , introduce further model parameters . in the frequently studied decoupling limit ( @xmath4 ) ,
the lightest neutral higgs boson is standard model - like , while h and a are close in mass and both couple with @xmath3 to down - type fermions and with @xmath5 to up - type fermions .
the dominant production mechanism for heavy neutral mssm higgs bosons at large @xmath3 is gg @xmath6 bbh / a with negligible contributions from other processes .
as the main decay mode h / a @xmath6 bb suffers from high qcd background , the decay h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 , reaching about 10% rate for @xmath810 , promises the most sensitivity .
charged higgs bosons couple to fermions as h@xmath0ud @xmath9 @xmath10 .
they are produced in top quark decay , if @xmath11 , or in association with a top quark , if @xmath12 .
light charged higgs bosons decay almost exclusively to a tau lepton and a neutrino for @xmath13 . for @xmath14 ,
the decay h@xmath15 @xmath6 tb dominates with an important contribution of h@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath16 at large @xmath3 .
the following processes are considered here : * associated bbh / a production followed by h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 with all possible @xmath7 final states ( jet jet , e jet , @xmath17 jet and e @xmath17 ) @xcite ; * production of a light charged higgs boson in tt @xmath6 h@xmath15bwb with subsequent h@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath18 , @xmath19 @xmath6 jet and w @xmath6 @xmath20 decays @xcite ; * associated h@xmath15t(b ) production of heavy charged higgs boson with h@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath21 , @xmath19 @xmath6 jet and hadronic top quark decays @xcite ; * associated h@xmath15t(b ) production of heavy charged higgs boson with h@xmath15 @xmath6 tb and one of the top quarks decaying leptonically @xcite .
the final states in the search for heavy mssm higgs bosons are complex : they typically contain leptons , b- and light - flavoured hadronic jets and missing transverse energy .
the selections rely on @xmath19-jet or lepton ( e , @xmath17 ) triggers .
@xmath19-identification based on vertex reconstruction and impact parameter measurements is powerful against hadronic jets .
a single b - tag is sufficient to suppress events from drell - yan , qcd multi - jet and w+jets processes . against the difficult tt
background a central jet veto is applied .
missing transverse energy ( @xmath22 ) reconstruction is important to account for the neutrinos from the higgs or the @xmath19 decays .
top quark and w boson mass reconstruction provides a further handle on the background .
for example , in the bbh / a , h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath6 @xmath23 + jet searches , it is instrumental in vetoing leptons from w decay by reconstructing the transverse mass of the [ lepton , @xmath22 ] system .
the main background comes from tt events , with significant contribution from w+jets events in the h@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath21 searches and drell - yan processes in the h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath6 @xmath23 + jet searches .
a major exception is the h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath6 jet jet analysis , where qcd events dominate the background . the typical selection efficiency is below 1% .
_ higgs boson mass reconstruction _ does not only increases the sensitivity of the searches , but it will also play a crucial role in constraining the mssm model parameters . in the h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 selection
the higgs mass can be measured by the di - tau mass assuming that the @xmath19 decay products are collinearly emitted .
while the procedure has large inefficiency , it achieves a mass resolution of about 20% . in the heavy
charged higgs search : h@xmath15 t @xmath6 @xmath21 bqq , the reconstruction of the top quark mass is instrumental in fully reconstructing the signal .
the charged higgs mass is then estimated by the transverse mass of the [ @xmath19 , @xmath22 ] system ( @xmath25 ) . by requiring @xmath26100 gev ,
an almost background - free selection is achieved .
the results presented here are based on the full simulation of the cms detector at low luminosity ( @xmath27 @xmath28s@xmath29 ) , assuming a total integrated luminosity of 30@xmath3060 fb@xmath29 .
pythia is used as the main monte carlo generator with notable exceptions ( e.g. matrix element generators for multi - parton or toprex for tt final states in some cases ) .
background cross - sections are normalized to nlo calculations where available .
tau decays are modeled by tauola . for the numerical results ,
the minimal supergravity inspired @xmath31-max benchmark scenario is used , which maximises the theoretical upper bound on @xmath31 for a given @xmath3 , @xmath32 and @xmath33 , the susy mass scale .
higgs boson masses , cross - sections and branching ratios are calculated by feynhiggs 2.3.2 . the estimated 5-sigma discovery reach is shown on figure [ fig : h](a ) for the pp @xmath6 bbh / a searches and on figure [ fig : h](b ) for the h@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath21 searches @xcite . in all cases the systematic uncertainties
are included in the calculation of signal significance .
5-sigma discovery reach of searches for ( a ) bbh / a production with h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 , ( b ) h@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath21 and ( c ) inclusive h @xmath6 @xmath34 and vector boson fusion qqh / h with h / h @xmath6 @xmath7 .
, title="fig : " ] 5-sigma discovery reach of searches for ( a ) bbh / a production with h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 , ( b ) h@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath21 and ( c ) inclusive h @xmath6 @xmath34 and vector boson fusion qqh / h with h / h @xmath6 @xmath7 .
, title="fig : " ] 5-sigma discovery reach of searches for ( a ) bbh / a production with h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 , ( b ) h@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath21 and ( c ) inclusive h @xmath6 @xmath34 and vector boson fusion qqh / h with h / h @xmath6 @xmath7 .
, title="fig : " ] \(a ) ( b ) ( c ) we also considered the extended @xmath31-max scenario , where the supersymmetric higgs mass parameter can take different values : @xmath35 .
the cross - section is enhanced for large negative and reduced for large positive values of @xmath17 , but the change in the higgs branching ratios due to decay modes to supersymmetric particles partially compensates this effect . in general , the default value of @xmath36 gev gives the most conservative discovery reach .
for a detailed discussion see @xcite . _ systematic uncertainties _
dominate these searches .
therefore , several methods are explored to measure them from collision data @xcite .
the main sources of uncertainty come from b - tagging , @xmath19- and lepton identification , missing energy measurement and energy scale calibration . together with the theoretical uncertainties on the background production cross - sections , we estimate typically 12% error on the main tt background , 9% on z/@xmath37 , 16% on bbz/@xmath37 , 10@xmath3014% on w+jets and 15% on tw processes .
the qcd background will be measured from data with a 5@xmath3020% statistical error .
the inclusion of systematic uncertainties has a significant impact on the expected sensitivities .
for example , in the charged higgs boson h@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath16 search , the 5-sigma reach is decreased from about 125 to 110 gev at the most difficult value of @xmath38 . at values of @xmath39 ,
the downward shift is even larger ranging from about 30 to 80 gev . in the search for gg @xmath6 h@xmath15 tb with h@xmath15 @xmath6 tb and tt
@xmath6 @xmath20b qqb requiring four b - tags , the main background comes from ttbb and mistagged tt + jets processes . with the simulation of the background processes by comphep ( with the cross - section calculated by alpgen ) and the inclusion of realistic experimental ( about 5@xmath305% on b - tagging efficiency and the mistag rate ) and theory uncertainties ,
no discovery potential remains for this channel .
the searches presented above for heavy higgs bosons loose their sensitivity for small and intermediate @xmath3 and leave open the so - called lhc wedge region , where only a light neutral higgs boson can be discovered .
this is illustrated on figure [ fig : h](c ) , where the sm higgs boson searches @xcite ( for inclusive pp @xmath6 h+x production with h @xmath6 @xmath34 and for the vector boson fusion process qq @xmath6 qqh / h with h / h @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath6 @xmath23 + jet ) are reinterpreted in mssm @xcite .
the author is partially supported by otka grant nk67974 . | minimal supersymmetric standard model electroweak symmetry broken higgs mechanism five scalars three neutral two charged higgs bosons tree level parameters mass higgs boson ratio vacuum expectation values two higgs fields determine masses couplings higgs sector radiative corrections from top - stop bottom - sbottom sector introduce model parameters decoupling limit @xmath4 lightest neutral higgs boson standard model - like h a close mass couple with @xmath3 - @xmath5 up - type fermions dominant production mechanism heavy neutral higgs bosons @xmath6 bbh / a negligible contributions other processes main decay mode h / a @xmath6 high qcd background decay h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 10% rate most sensitivity charged higgs bosons couple to fermions @xmath9 produced in top quark decay top quark light charged higgs bosons decay to tau lepton neutrino for @xmath13@xmath14 decay@xmath15 @xmath6 tb dominates contribution@xmath15 @xmath6 @xmath16 @xmath3 processes considered bbh / a production h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 final states jet production light charged higgs boson @xmath6@xmath15bwb@xmath15 jet decays h@xmath15t(b ) production heavy charged higgs boson jet hadronic top quark decays@xmath15t(b ) production heavy charged higgs boson@xmath15 @xmath6 tb top decaying leptonically final states heavy mssm higgs bosons complex contain leptons b- light - flavoured hadronic jets missing transverse energy selections @xmath19-jet lepton triggers @xmath19-identification vertex reconstruction impact parameter measurements against hadronic jets single b - tag events drell - yan qcd multi - jet w+jets processes difficult background central jet veto missing transverse energy @xmath22 ) reconstruction neutrinos higgs @xmath19 decays top quark w boson mass reconstruction backgroundbbh / @xmath6 + jet searches vetoing leptons from w decay reconstructing transverse mass lepton @xmath22 system main background from tt events contribution from w+jets events@xmath15 @xmath21 drell - yan processes searches major exception @xmath6 jet analysis qcd events dominate background typical selection efficiency below 1% higgs boson mass reconstruction increases mssm model parameters h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 selection higgs mass measured by di - tau mass @xmath19 decay products collinearly emitted procedure large inefficiency achieves mass resolution about 20% heavy charged higgs search@xmath15 reconstruction of top quark mass reconstructing signal charged higgs mass estimated by transverse mass @xmath19, @xmath22 system requiring @xmath26100 gev almost background - free selection results based on full simulation cms detector at low luminosity @xmath27@xmath29 ) total integrated luminosity of 30@xmath3060 fb@xmath29 pythia main monte carlo generator with exceptionsmatrix element generators multi - parton toprex tt final states background cross - sections normalized to nlo calculations tau decays modeled by tauola numerical results minimal supergravity @xmath31-max benchmark scenario maximises theoretical upper bound @xmath31 @xmath3 @xmath32 @xmath33 susy mass scale higgs boson masses cross - sections branching ratios calculated by feynhiggs 2.3.2 estimated 5-sigma discovery reach shown figure @xmath6 bbh / a searches h@xmath15 @xmath21 searches systematic uncertainties included calculation signal significance 5-sigma discovery reach searches bbh / a production h / a @xmath6 @xmath7 h@xmath15 inclusive h vector boson fusion 5-sigma discovery reach searches bbh / a production h / @xmath6 h@xmath15 inclusive h @xmath34 vector boson fusiontitle="fig 5-sigma discovery reach bbh / production h @xmath6 @xmath7 h@xmath15 inclusive h @xmath6 @xmath34 vector boson fusion qqh h h @xmath6 extended @xmath31-max scenario supersymmetric higgs mass parameter different values @xmath35 cross - section enhanced for negative reduced positive values @xmath17 change higgs branching ratios decay compensates default value @xmath36 gev conservative discovery reach discussion @xcite systematic uncertainties dominate searches methods explored measure collision data sources uncertainty from b - tagging @xmath19- lepton identification missing energy measurement energy scale calibration theoretical uncertainties background production sections estimate 12% error main tt background 9% z/@xmath37 16% bbz/@xmath37 w+jets 15% tw processes qcd background measured from data 5@xmath3020% statistical error systematic uncertainties impact sensitivities charged higgs boson h@xmath15 search 5-sigma reach decreased from 125 to 110 gev difficult value @xmath38values @xmath39 downward shift larger 30 to 80 gev search gg @xmath6@xmath15 tb tt @xmath6 four b - tags background from ttbb mistagged tt + jets processes simulation background processes comphep cross - section alpgen realistic experimental 5@xmath305% b - tagging efficiency mistag rate theory uncertainties no discovery potential channel searches heavy higgs bosons loose small intermediate @xmath3 leave lhc wedge region light neutral higgs boson discovered illustrated figure h](c sm higgs boson searches @xcite pp @xmath6 h+x production @xmath34 vector boson fusion process @xmath6 h + jet reinterpreted mssm @xcite author supported otka grant nk67974 | 0.349249 | 2,426 | 1,224 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,381 | we briefly review the status of rare radiative and semileptonic @xmath0 , ( @xmath1 ) decays .
we discuss possible signatures of new physics in these modes and emphazise the role of the exclusive channels .
in particular , measurements of the forward - backward asymmetry in @xmath2 decays and its zero provide a clean test of the standard model , complementary to studies in @xmath3 decays .
further , the forward - backward cp asymmetry in @xmath2 decays is sensitive to possible non - standard sources of cp violation mediated by flavor changing neutral current @xmath4-penguins .
slac - pub-8551 + august 2000 | flavor changing neutral current ( fcnc ) @xmath5 decays do not occur at tree level in the standard model ( sm ) .
being loop induced , they feel scales of order @xmath6 and in principle much higher ones , making them important probes of the flavor sector of the sm and beyond .
rare radiative @xmath3 decays proceed via so - called electromagnetic penguins .
they have been measured in exclusive @xmath7 @xcite and inclusive @xmath8 @xcite decays . in dilepton channels
@xmath9 ( @xmath1 ) , we identify two additional structures in the feynman diagrams : boxes and @xmath4-penguins . none of the dilepton modes has been detected to date , but we expect large data samples from operating @xmath10-factories ( cleo , babar , belle ) , dedicated @xmath10-physics programmes at colliders ( tevatron run ii , hera - b ) and lhc - b in the long term . corresponding @xmath11 transition amplitudes are ckm suppressed @xmath12 .
the existing best bound in the dimuon channels for inclusive decays is @xmath13 at 90% c.l .
@xcite , which is one order of magnitude above the nlo sm expectation @xmath14 @xcite .
note that the nnlo calculation in @xmath9 is only partially available @xcite .
corresponding bounds for the exclusive channels are @xmath15 , @xmath16 at 90% c.l . @xcite and their respective sm predictions are @xmath17 , @xmath18 with the dominant theoretical uncertainty resulting from hadronic matrix elements , which are estimated here using light cone sum rules @xcite .
currently , the exclusive @xmath19 decay has the most interesting bound , which is only a factor of 2 away from the sm prediction . despite larger theoretical uncertainty than in the inclusive cases ,
rare exclusive decays are more accessible experimentally in the near future and have observables ( e.g. existence and position of the zero of the forward - backward asymmetry discussed below ) , which are as clean as the respective ones in the inclusive modes .
the calculational tool for the description of @xmath20 decays is the low energy effective hamiltonian @xmath21 @xcite .
this enables the analysis of relevant observables in a model independent way , with the goal being to extract the wilson coefficients @xmath22 from data @xcite .
the mayor player is the @xmath23 vertex @xmath24 .
its effective coupling strength @xmath25 is related to the branching ratio @xmath26 thus @xmath27 @xcite which is in good agreement with the sm value @xmath28 at @xmath29 at leading log .
we see that the @xmath3 data fix the modulus of @xmath25 , but not its sign ( phase )
. in @xmath9 decays , in addition to @xmath30 , also 4-fermi operators involving dileptons contribute , given by @xmath31 , @xmath32 . due to the charge assignments of lepton-@xmath4 couplings
the @xmath4-penguin contribution to @xmath33 is suppressed with respect to @xmath34 by @xmath35 .
we thus identify @xmath34 as a measure of the @xmath36 coupling modulo the box contribution @xcite .
decomposition of the @xmath37 branching ratio yields @xmath38 @xcite . using the cdf bound @xcite on this mode and allowing @xmath25 to have both sm - like and sm - opposite signs gives the present best bound on the strength of generic fcnc @xmath4-penguins of @xmath39 , which is a factor of 2 - 3 larger than the sm value @xmath40 @xcite .
scenarios with non - standard @xmath4-penguins arise in many extensions of the sm like such as supersymmetry , 4th generation and @xmath41 @xcite .
another interesting possibility to test the @xmath36 vertex arises in @xmath42 decays , since here no photon penguins contribute .
supersymmetric effects in inclusive @xmath9 decays have been studied in @xcite .
the reach of a new physics search in the dilepton invariant mass distribution in @xmath44 decays is exemplified in fig .
[ fig1 ] @xcite .
supergravity ( sugra ) ( dotted ) and a supersymmetric scenario with non - minimal sources of flavor violation in the mass insertion approximation ( dashed ) , can be well discriminated from the sm ( solid ) and its hadronic uncertainties ( shaded area ) ; the upper curves contain resonant @xmath45 background via @xmath46 , lower ones are pure short - distance contributions @xcite .
note that the dashed curve saturates the experimental bound in this channel .
similar findings are valid for @xmath47 decays , which however show less sensitivity to @xmath25 as the photon pole at @xmath48 is absent . in either case @xmath49 ( opposite - to - sm sign )
enhances the rates through constructive interference of @xmath25 with @xmath33 .
the forward - backward asymmetry in @xmath2 decays results from v / a interference in the lepton pair @xmath50 , shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] @xcite ; see @xcite for a discussion of the sign of @xmath51 , which is opposite to the forward - backward asymmetry @xmath52 of the cp conjugate channel in the cp conserving limit . in the sm ( @xmath53 , solid curve ) , @xmath51 has a zero around @xmath54 , which would disappear if @xmath25 would have the opposite sign ( long - short - dashed curve ) .
the existence of a zero in the forward - backward asymmetry in @xmath2 decays below the @xmath55 resonance is an important test of the sm and is independent of hadronic matrix elements @xcite .
positive @xmath25 occurs generically in supersymmetric theories @xcite , but only for large @xmath56 in relaxed and/or minimal sugra @xcite .
further , the position of the zero @xmath57 has very small hadronic uncertainties @xcite . in the limit where the final hadron has large energy , i.e. , small dilepton mass ,
the large energy effective theory @xcite is applicable and here all form factors cancel out in the ratios which determines @xmath57 @xcite .
a recently proposed observable , the forward - backward cp asymmetry @xmath58 in @xmath2 decays probes the phase of @xmath34 or of the @xmath36 vertex @xcite , respectively .
defined as @xmath59 , its magnitude scales with @xmath60 , where @xmath61 contains contributions from resonant and non - resonant @xmath62 states @xcite ; @xmath63 below threshold , so it is sizeable only in the high dilepton mass region .
integration over @xmath64 yields @xmath65 , which can be large in the case of @xmath66 phases .
hadronic uncertainties are not small , but the sm background is below @xmath67 and any effect above this would be due to a non - sm source of cp violation @xcite .
the sm branching ratio in @xmath8 decays is known at nlo with 10 % accuracy @xmath68 @xcite .
this is in good agreement with data from lep @xmath69 @xcite , and cleo , @xmath70 @xcite .
a promising observable in @xmath3 decays where dramatic signals of possible physics beyond the sm could show up is the cp asymmetry in the rate @xmath71 @xcite .
it is very tiny in the sm since @xmath72 , @xmath73 are wolfenstein parameters , thus @xmath74 @xcite
. however , large effects of ( 10 - 50 ) % are possible in scenarios with an enhanced chromo - magnetic dipole operator @xmath75 in the @xmath76 vertex .
cp asymmetry in exclusive @xmath7 decays has a less clean prediction due to strong phases , however , in the sm , @xmath77 holds @xcite .
any significant deviation from this would signal new physics . in both inclusive @xmath78 @xcite and exclusive cases @xmath79 @xcite ,
the measurements are not conclusive yet .
theoretically clear signatures of possible new physics can be experimentally isolated in @xmath3 and @xmath9 decays in the near future via the observables ( @xmath80 ) .
it is exciting to see whether the sm passes this next round of fcnc tests .
t.e.coan _ et al . _ , ( cleo collaboration ) , phys.rev.lett . 84 ( 2000 ) 5283 .
et al . _ , ( cleo collaboration ) , phys . rev . lett.74(1995)2885 ; + s. ahmed _ et.al . _ ( cleo collaboration ) , cleo conf 9910 ( hep ex/9908022 ) .
r. barate _
et al . _ , ( aleph collaboration ) phys
. lett . b429 ( 1998 ) 169 .
s. glenn _ et al .
_ , ( cleo collaboration ) , phys . rev . lett . 80 ( 1998 ) 2289 .
a. ali , l.t .
handoko , g. hiller and t. morozumi , phys .
d55 ( 1997 ) 4105 .
c.bobeth , m. misiak and j. urban , nucl .
b574 ( 2000 ) 291 . t. affolder _ et al .
_ , ( cdf collaboration ) , phys.rev.lett . 83 ( 1999 ) 3378 .
see , a. ali _ et al .
d61 ( 2000 ) 074024 , and references therein . a.j .
buras _ et al .
b424(1994)374 ; a.j .
buras and m. mnz , phys .
d52(1995)186 ; m. misiak , nucl .
b393(1993)23 ; err .
ibid . b439 ( 1995 ) 461 .
a. ali , g.f .
giudice and t. mannel , zeitschrift fr physik c67(1995)417 .
see , g. buchalla , g. hiller and g. isidori , hep - ph/0006136 , and references therein .
s. bertolini _ et al .
cho , m. misiak and d. wyler , phys .
d54(1996)3329;j.l . hewett and j.d .
wells , phys .
rev.d55(1997)5549 ; e. lunghi , a. masiero , i. scimemi and l. silvestrini , nucl .
b568 ( 2000 ) 120 . t. goto , y. okada and y. shimizu , phys .
a. ali , t. mannel and t. morozumi , phys .
b273(1991)505 ; f. krger and l.m .
sehgal , phys .
b380(1996)199 ; z. ligeti , i.w .
stewart and m.b .
wise , phys .
b420(1998)359 ; a. ali and g. hiller , phys .
d60 ( 1999 ) 034017 .
g. burdman , phys .
j. charles _ et al .
d60(1999)014001 . see , f. borzumati and c. greub , phys.rev .
d59 ( 1999 ) 057501 , and references therein .
a.l.kagan and m.neubert , phys.rev .
d58 ( 1998 ) 094012 . c. greub , h. simma and d. wyler , nucl .
b434 ( 1995 ) 39 . | flavor changing @xmath5 decays tree level standard model loop induced feel scales @xmath6 higher important probes flavor sector rare radiative @xmath3 decays via electromagnetic penguins measured in exclusive @xmath7 @xmath8 @xcite decays dilepton channels @xmath9 two structures boxes @xmath4-penguins dilepton modes detected expect large data samples from @xmath10-factories-physics programmes colliders long term @xmath11 transition amplitudes suppressed @xmath12 best bound dimuon channels for decays @xmath13 at 90% c.l . @xcite one order above nlo sm expectation @xmath14 @xcite nnlo calculation in @xmath9 partially available @xcite bounds for exclusive channels are @xmath15 @xmath16 at 90% c.l . @xcite sm predictions @xmath17 @xmath18 dominant theoretical uncertainty from hadronic matrix elements estimated using light cone sum rules exclusive @xmath19 decay has interesting bound factor of 2 away from sm prediction larger theoretical uncertainty rare exclusive decays accessible experimentally observablesexistence position forward - backward asymmetry inclusive modes calculational tool @xmath20 decays low energy hamiltonian @xmath21 @xcite enables analysis observables extract wilson coefficients @xmath22 from data @xcite mayor player @xmath23 vertex @xmath24 coupling strength branching ratio @xmath26 @xmath27 sm value @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath3 data fix modulus @xmath25 not sign phase @xmath9 decays 4-fermi operators dileptons contribute @xmath31 @xmath32 lepton-@xmath4 couplings @xmath4-penguin contribution @xmath33 suppressed @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath34 measure @xmath36 coupling contribution @xcite decomposition @xmath37 branching ratio yields @xmath38 @xcite cdf bound @xcite @xmath25 sm - like - opposite signs best bound strength generic fcnc @xmath4-penguins @xmath39 2 - 3 larger sm value @xmath40 @xcite scenarios non - standard @xmath4-penguins arise extensions supersymmetry 4th generation @xmath41 @xcitepossibility test @xmath36 vertex in @xmath42 decays no photon penguins contribute supersymmetric effects @xmath9 decays studied in @xcite new physics search dilepton invariant mass distribution @xmath44 decays exemplified in fig supergravity supersymmetric scenario non - minimal flavor violation mass insertion approximation discriminated from sm hadronic uncertainties upper curves contain resonant @xmath45 background via @xmath46 lower short - distance contributions dashed curve saturates experimental bound similar findings @xmath47 decays less sensitivity to @xmath25 photon pole @xmath48 absent @xmath49 enhances rates through interference @xmath25 with @xmath33 forward - backward asymmetry in @xmath2 decays results from interference lepton pair @xmath50 fig sign @xmath51 opposite to forward - backward asymmetry @xmath52 cp conjugate channel @xmath51 zero around @xmath54 if @xmath25 opposite sign zero forward - backward asymmetry in @xmath2 decays below @xmath55 resonance test sm independent of hadronic matrix elements@xmath25 occurs supersymmetric theories @xmath56 relaxed minimal sugra position zero @xmath57 small hadronic uncertainties final hadron large energy small dilepton mass large energy effective theory applicable form factors cancel @xmath57 forward - backward cp asymmetry @xmath58 in @xmath2 decays probes phase @xmath34 @xmath36 vertex @xmath59 magnitude scales with @xmath60 @xmath61 contributions resonant non - resonant @xmath62 @xmath63 below threshold sizeable high dilepton mass region integration over @xmath64 yields @xmath65 large @xmath66 phases hadronic uncertainties not small sm background below @xmath67 due non - sm source cp violation sm branching ratio in @xmath8 decays known 10 % accuracy @xmath68 with data lep @xmath69 cleo @xmath70 promising observable @xmath3 decays cp asymmetry rate @xmath71 @xcite tiny in sm @xmath72 @xmath73 wolfenstein parameters @xmath74large effects 10 - 50 ) % possible enhanced chromo - magnetic dipole operator @xmath75 @xmath76 vertex cp asymmetry @xmath7 decays less clean prediction strong phases @xmath77 holds @xcite significant deviation new @xmath78 @xcite @xmath79 @xcite measurements not conclusive signatures new physics isolated @xmath3 @xmath9 decays observables @xmath80 exciting see sm passes next fcnc tests t.e.coan cleo collaboration.rev.lett . 84 ( 2000 ) 5283 phys . rev lett.74(1995)2885 ahmed cleo collaboration 9910/9908022 ) barate collaboration phys . lett. b429 ( 1998 ) 169 glenn cleo collaboration phys . rev 80 ( 1998 ) 2289 a. ali handoko hiller morozumi phys . d55 ( 1997 ) 4105.bobeth misiak j urban nucl. b574 ( 2000 ) 291 affolder cdf collaboration phys.rev.lett . 83 ( 1999 ) 3378 a. alid61 ( 2000 ) 074024 references buras b424(1994)374 mnz d52(1995)186 misiak b393(1993)23 b439 ( 1995 ) 461 a. ali giudice t. mannel physik c67(1995)417 g. hiller isidori ph/0006136 references s misiak d. wyler d54(1996)3329 hewett j wells.d55(1997)5549 e. lunghi a. masiero. scimemi l. silvestrini b568 ( 2000 ) 120 t. goto y. okada shimizu ali t. mannel t. morozumi b273(1991)505 f. krger sehgal b380(1996)199 z. ligeti stewart wise b420(1998)359 a. ali g. hiller d60 ( 1999 ) 034017 burdman charles d60(1999)014001 f. borzumati c. greub.rev d59 ( 1999 ) 057501 references a.l.kagan m.neubert.rev1998 ) 094012 greub simma wyler nucl b434 1995 39 | 0.434651 | 2,663 | 1,442 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,384 | the function @xmath0 is conjectured to be equal to @xmath1 when @xmath2 is the imaginary part of the @xmath3-th zero of @xmath4 on the critical line . if @xmath5 then the exact transcendental equation for the riemann zeros has a solution for each positive integer @xmath3 which proves that riemann s hypothesis is true since the counting function for zeros on the critical line is equal to the counting function for zeros on the critical strip if the transcendental equation has a solution for each @xmath3 . | the riemann - siegel @xmath7 function is defined by @xmath8 let @xmath9 be the approximate @xmath7 function where the @xmath10 function has been replaced with its stirling approximation . @xmath11 the @xmath6 function is not invertible but the inverse of its approximation @xmath12 is defined by a linear function of the lambert w function given by @xmath13 let @xmath14 be the function which gives the fractional part of a real number by subtracting either the floor @xmath15 or the ceiling @xmath16 of @xmath17 from @xmath17 , depending upon its sign .
furthermore , let @xmath18 be the argument of @xmath4 on the critical line .
[ ec]the for the imaginary part of the @xmath3-th zero of @xmath19 ( * ? ? ?
* equation 20 ) @xmath20 has a solution for each integer @xmath21 where @xmath22 enumerate the zeros of @xmath23 on the real line and the zeros of @xmath4 on the critical line @xmath24 where @xmath25 denotes the positive integers .
* equation 14 ) the @xmath3-th gram point is defined to be the solution of the equation @xmath26 a very accurate approximation @xmath27 to the gram points is @xmath28 is found by inverting @xmath12 to get the exact solution @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the lambert w function , and the approximation bounds @xmath31 when @xmath32 is @xmath33 , followed by @xmath34 and decreases monotincally with increasing @xmath3 , that is , @xmath35 .
the inverse of @xmath27 is given by @xmath36 now define the infinite sequence of functions indexed by @xmath37 @xmath38 near each `` bad '' gram point there will be a corresponding zero on the critical line which has an argument not on the principal branch .
the function @xmath39 determines how many multiples of @xmath40 to add or subtract to @xmath41 so that it agrees with the argument of @xmath4 at a zero on the critical line where it is discontinuous , having the value @xmath42 when @xmath43 .
let @xmath44 let @xmath45 be the sign of @xmath6 . [ c]the argument @xmath46 of @xmath19 at the n - th non - trivial zero @xmath47 on the critical strip is equal to @xmath48 , that is @xmath49 if conjecture [ c ] is true then conjecture [ ec ] is true and , due to @xmath50 [ fl ] , so is conjecture [ rh ] , the riemann hypothesis . if @xmath51=@xmath52 then @xmath52 is well - defined @xmath53 since @xmath51 is well - defined @xmath53 .
@xmath54 the argument of any positive number @xmath17 with @xmath55 is equal to @xmath56 and @xmath57 @xmath58 .
that is @xmath59
[ le]if the limit @xmath63 is exists and is well - defined @xmath64 then the left - hand side of equation ( [ ae ] ) is well - defined @xmath64 , and due to monotonicity , there must be a unique solution for every @xmath37 .
* ii.a ) the riemann - von - mangoldt formula makes use of cauchy s argument principle to count the number of zeros @xmath73 where @xmath74 with @xmath75 @xmath76 and this definition does not depend on the riemann hypothesis(conjecture [ rh ] ) .
this equation has exactly the same form as the asymptotic equation [ ae ] .
* equation 15 ) if the exact equation has a unique solution for each @xmath3 , then the zeros obtained from its solutions on the can be counted since they are enumerated by the integer @xmath3 , leading to the counting function @xmath78 in equation ( [ n0 ] )
. the number of solutions obtained on the would saturate counting function of the number of solutions on the so that @xmath79 and thus all of the non - trivial zeros of @xmath4 would be enumerated in this manner .
if there are zeros off of the critical line , or zeros with multiplicity @xmath80 , then the exact equation ( [ ee ] ) would fail to capture all the zeros on the critical strip which would mean @xmath81 .
* ix ) 1 guilherme frana and andr leclair .
transcendental equations satisfied by the individual zeros of riemann zeta , dirichlet and modular l - functions . _
communications in number theory and physics _ , 2015 . | riemann - siegel @xmath7 function defined by @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath7 @xmath10 replaced with approximation @xmath11 @xmath6 function not invertible inverse approximation @xmath12 defined linear function lambert w function @xmath13 @xmath14 function fractional part real number subtracting floor ceiling @xmath17 @xmath18 argument @xmath4 critical line imaginary @xmath3-th zero @xmath19 equation 20 @xmath20 solution each integer @xmath21 @xmath22 zeros @xmath23 real line @xmath4 critical line @xmath25 positive integers equation 14 @xmath3-th gram point solution equation @xmath26 accurate approximation @xmath27 gram points inverting @xmath12 exact solution @xmath30 lambert w function approximation bounds @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 decreases @xmath3 @xmath35 inverse of @xmath27 @xmath36 infinite sequence functions indexed by @xmath37 @xmath38 each gram point corresponding zero on critical line argument not principal branchfunction @xmath39 determines multiples @xmath40 add subtract @xmath41 with argument @xmath4 zero critical line value @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 sign @xmath6 argument @xmath46 @xmath19 n - non - trivial zero @xmath47 critical strip equal @xmath48 @xmath49 conjecture c ] true ec ] true conjecture rh riemann hypothesis @xmath51=@xmath52 @xmath52 well - defined @xmath53 argument positive number @xmath17 with @xmath55 equal to @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 limit @xmath63 exists well - defined @xmath64 left - hand side equation well - defined @xmath64 unique solution @xmath37 riemann - von - mangoldt formula cauchy s argument principle count zeros @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 depend on riemann hypothesis equation same form as asymptotic equationequation 15 exact equation unique solution @xmath3 zeros counted enumerated by integer @xmath3 counting function @xmath78 equation ( [ n0 ] ) solutions saturate counting function @xmath79 non - trivial zeros of @xmath4 enumerated zeros off critical line multiplicity @xmath80 exact equation ( [ ee ] ) capture zeros critical strip @xmath81 guilherme frana andr leclair transcendental equations satisfied by individual zeros of riemann zeta dirichlet modular l - functions communications number theory physics 2015 | 0.181474 | 1,050 | 569 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,388 | the cp asymmetry predicted by the standard model in the decay modes @xmath0 and @xmath1 is very small , and the observation of a sizeable effect would be a clear indication of new physics beyond the standard model .
contrary to the final state @xmath2 , the former final state is a cp eigenstate , and therefore complex angular distribution analyses are not necessary for the asymmetry measurement . in this paper , the approaches for the study of these two decay channels are presented . | the decay mode @xmath3 is analogous to the mode @xmath4 , which has been studied extensively in view of cp violation measurements . in these two decay modes ,
the cp asymmetry predicted by the standard model is very small , and the observation of a sizeable effect would be a clear signal of physics beyond the standard model . the decay channel @xmath3 can be used to measure various parameters in the @xmath5-meson system . in the atlas experiment , assuming an integrated luminosity of 30 fb@xmath6 , roughly 10 000 decays can be reconstructed with a signal - to - background ratio of about 1:1 , as will be shown later in this paper .
it can be thus foreseen that the measurement of the branching fraction of this mode , the measurement of the @xmath5 lifetime , as well as other measurements will be feasible , which constitues an important cross - check of other measurements performed using other decay channels .
moreover , the decay mode @xmath3 , when combined with its u - spin symmetric channel , @xmath7 , provides a new strategy for the extraction of the @xmath8 angle of the unitarity triangle @xcite .
indeed , while the phase @xmath9 is ckm suppressed for the decay mode @xmath3 , this is not the case for the decay mode @xmath7 .
cp violation effects could thus potentially be more easily accessible through the latter mode by measuring the time - dependent asymmetry of @xmath10 .
the overall normalization can be fixed by measuring cp averaged rates of @xmath7 and @xmath3 , which assumes the validity of the u - spin symmetry ( the approximate symmetry of u , d and s quarks ) .
the measurements seem to be , however , out of reach due to the small expected branching ratio of @xmath7 , and the overlapping mass peaks of the @xmath5 and @xmath11 @xcite .
the @xmath12 system is characterized by two eigenstates with different masses and decay rates .
the experimental determination of the mass difference @xmath13 and the rate difference @xmath14 will be valuable input for flavour dynamics in both the standard model and its possible extensions . while the measurement of @xmath13 has been proven to be accessible through the decays @xmath15 and @xmath16 , @xmath14 is expected to be precisely measured in atlas through the decay channel @xmath4 .
signal samples of @xmath17 were generated using the monte carlo program pythia 5.7 @xcite .
the j/@xmath18 meson was forced to decay into @xmath19 , and only events passing the atlas level-1 trigger requirements for b hadrons @xcite ( a muon with a @xmath20 6 gev and @xmath21 ) is used for the transverse momentum with respect to the beam direction , and @xmath22 for the pseudorapidity . ] and the @xmath22 meson decaying into @xmath23 were retained .
the branching ratio for the decay @xmath24 is ( @xmath25 ) % @xcite .
events were further selected to satisfy the atlas second level trigger : the presence of a second muon with @xmath26 gev and @xmath27 .
the resulting signal samples were consisting of about 17,000 @xmath28 events and 15,000 @xmath29 events .
a full geant - based simulation was used to simulate the response of the atlas inner detector and the electromagnetic calorimeter .
the muon chambers were not included in the simulation , but only real muons were included in the analysis .
the muon identification efficiencies were assumed to be 85% for the first muon ( the muon with @xmath20 6 gev ) and 78% for the second muon ( the muon with @xmath20 3 gev ) . the 85% efficiency for the muon with the higher transverse momentum includes both reconstruction and level-1 trigger efficiencies .
the j/@xmath18 was reconstructed by fitting pairs of opposite - charge muons passing the level-2 selection ( @xmath30 ) ( @xmath31 ) is used to indicate a muon with a @xmath20 6 ( 3 ) gev . ] to a common vertex and by calculating their invariant mass . the @xmath32/d.o.f . of the vertex fit
was required to be less than 6.0 , and the decay vertex of the j/@xmath18 was required to be detached from the primary vertex by at least 250 @xmath33 m in the transverse plane .
the j/@xmath18 mass resolution was found to be 39 mev .
the resolution of the j/@xmath18 decay vertex in the transverse plane was 64 @xmath33 m @xcite .
the efficiency of the reconstruction within a three - standard - deviation mass window was 79% . if a j/@xmath18 was found , the analysis proceeded with @xmath22-reconstruction in the electromagnetic calorimeter .
the @xmath22 reconstruction is described in more detail in ref .
@xcite . the mass distribution , fig . 1 ,
was fitted with two gaussians , and the obtained mass resolution was @xmath34 .
the total reconstruction efficiecny was 2.3@xmath35 within two standard deviations from the nominal mass . to the j/@xmath18 and @xmath22 candidates were combined to reconstruct both the @xmath36 and @xmath37
. a mass resolution of around 67 mev was found for both channels , with an overall signal efficiency of @xmath38 1@xmath35 within three standard deviations from the nominal mass . to the background considered was a sample of @xmath39 decays , processed and selected in the same way as the signal events .
the resulting efficiency was less than 0.009@xmath35 .
the table below summarizes the event rates for both signals and background . .assumed branching ratios for @xmath17 , and the estimated numbers of signal and background events for an integrated luminosity of 30 fb@xmath6 .
@xmath40 is the @xmath41 mixing angle ( see ref .
@xcite ) . [ cols="<,^,^",options="header " , ] for the measurement of the cp asymmetry in the @xmath42-system , the so - called same - side jet - charge tagging method was used for distinguishing production of @xmath42 and @xmath43 @xcite .
the jet charge was defined as : @xmath44 where @xmath45 is the charge of the @xmath46 particle in the jet , and @xmath47 is the momentum .
all charged particles with @xmath48 gev , @xmath49 around the reconstructed b - meson were included in the jet , if the distance between the particle and the b - meson , @xmath50 , was less than 0.8 .
particles not originating from near the primary vertex were excluded by requiring that the transverse impact parameter @xmath51 was less than 1 cm and the @xmath52-coordinate of the particle at the point of closest approach was within 5 cm of the @xmath52 of the primary vertex .
the particles from the b - meson decay itself were excluded as well . in the analysis ,
the reconstructed b - meson was defined as @xmath42 ( @xmath43 ) if the jet - charge had @xmath53 ( @xmath54 ) , where @xmath55 is a tunable cut .
the exponent @xmath56 was optimized to maximize the tagging quality factor @xmath57 , where @xmath58 is the tagging dilution factor , originating from wrong - sign tags ( @xmath59 , where @xmath60 is the fraction of wrong - sign tags ) , and @xmath61 is the tagging efficiency .
the optimum parameters were found to be @xmath62 , @xmath63 , resulting in a quality factor of 3.85% with @xmath64 , @xmath65 .
the observable asymmetry is : @xmath66 where @xmath67 combines the experimental dilution factors due to mistagging and background .
@xmath68 is the ratio of the number of observed signal events to the total number of observed events . assuming that the decay time resolution is @xmath69 = 0.073 ps , the error on the cp asymmetry was estimated to be : @xmath70 where @xmath71
where @xmath72 , @xmath73 is the cabibbo angle , @xmath22 is the height of the unitarity triangle and @xmath8 is one of the angles of the unitarity triangle .
the @xmath4 mode has a clean experimental signature . for its reconstruction ,
the same approach as for the @xmath17 was used .
details are given in @xcite the @xmath74 leads to three final state helicity configurations and their linear combinations are cp eigenstates with different cp parities @xcite . for the extraction of the cp - violating weak mixing phase @xmath75
the helicity amplitudes need to be separated .
experimentally , one can measure three independent angles and the @xmath5 proper decay time .
the initial @xmath5 flavour can be tagged in part of the events .
the atlas precision for these measurements was determined by detector response simulations and was used as input to angular analyses based on a maximum likelihood fit in repeated monte carlo experiments .
the likelihood function @xmath76 is defined as : @xmath77 with : @xmath78 where @xmath79=0.5 for untagged events , @xmath80=1-r , @xmath81=r if the @xmath5 is tagged as a particle and @xmath80=r , @xmath81=1-r if the @xmath5 tagged as an anti - particle , r is the wrong tag fraction , b is the level of background and @xmath82 is the average decay rate of the background .
the probability density @xmath83 is defined by : @xmath84 in which @xmath85 are expressed in terms of four parameters of @xmath5 weak decay and oscillations : @xmath86 , @xmath87 , @xmath88 , @xmath89 , and four independent parameters of helicity amplitudes : @xmath90 , @xmath91 , and the two strong phases @xmath92 and @xmath93 . the angular functions @xmath94 are given in @xcite , where more details about the analysis are also given . in the maximum likelihood fit the @xmath86 , the @xmath87 and the weak phase @xmath95 were simultaneously determined along with two helicity amplitude values and their strong phases .
the mixing parameter @xmath96 was assumed to have been measured in the @xmath15 and @xmath16 and was fixed . to
while all the eight parameters are independent in the theoretical models , the experimental resolution causes some of them become correlated , particularly the two strong phases , which prevented their simultaneous determination .
thus in the final analysis these two parametres were fixed . for an integral luminosity of 30 fb@xmath6
, @xmath86 can be detrmined with a relative error of 12@xmath35 , while the precision of @xmath95 depends on the value of @xmath96 and on the proper time resolution , as shown in fig . 3 , where the discovery lines for atlas and lhcb are displayed in the ( @xmath97 ) plane , together with regions allowed by the standard model and by one example of new physics known as the left - right symmetric model @xcite .
atlas is expected to measure several parameters in the bs meson system , which will be valuable input for the flavour dynamics in the standard model and its possible extensions .
a clear signal of the decay mode @xmath3 is expected to be reconstructed with the atlas detector , and several measurements are possible such as the measurement of the branching fraction and the bs meson lifetime .
the experimental resolution of the cp asymmetry measured shows some sensitivity to very large asymmetries as predicted by some models beyond the standard model .
the measurement of the @xmath8 angle seems , however to be compromised because the @xmath7 is not observable .
after 3 years at luminosity @xmath98 atlas is expected to determine @xmath86 with the relative errors of 12@xmath35 .
the atlas discovery line ( fig . 3 ) shows that the precision is high enough to be sensitive to new physics .
this work has been performed within the atlas collaboration , and the author would like to thank all members of the collaboration , particularly members of the atlas b - physics working group .
pz skands , jhep 0101:008,2001 c driouichi _
et al _ , observation of the decays @xmath99 in the atlas experiment at the lhc " .
phys . j. direct c4:n2 , 2002 .
t sjstrand , computer physics commun .
82 ( 1994 ) 74 .
atlas collaboration , atlas detector and physics performance technical design report vol i , cern / lhcc/9914 ( 1999 ) . de groom @xmath100 @xmath101 , eur .
j. c15 ( 2000 ) 1 and 2001 off - year partial update for the 2002 edition , available on the pdg www pages ( url : http://pdg.lbl.gov/ ) .
atlas collaboration , atlas detector and physics performance technical design report vol ii , cern / lhcc/9915 ( 1999 ) .
f ohlsson - malek and m melcher , ` atlas calorimeter performance for identification of @xmath8 , @xmath102 and @xmath22 particles at low transverse momentum ' , isn-01.75 and atlas internal note atl - com - phys-2001 - 021 ( 2001 ) .
t feldman , int .
a15 ( 2000 ) 159 .
a dighe , i dunietz , h lipkin , jl rosner , phys . lett .
b369 ( 1996 ) 144 - 150 .
m smizanska , ` determination of @xmath103 by atlas and the impact of non - zero @xmath103 on other @xmath5 studies ' , atl - phys-99 - 003 .
m smizanska , nucl .
a446 : 138 - 142 , 2000 .
p ball and r fleischer , phys .
b475 ( 2000 ) 111 . | decay mode @xmath3 analogous to @xmath4 studied cp violation measurements cp asymmetry standard model small sizeable effect signal of physics beyond standard model decay channel @xmath3 parameters in @xmath5-meson system in atlas experiment luminosity 30 fb@xmath6 10 000 decays reconstructed signal - to - background ratio 1:1 shown later measurement branching fraction @xmath5 lifetime other measurements feasible cross - check of measurements channels decay mode @xmath3 with u - spin symmetric channel @xmath7 provides new strategy for extraction @xmath8 angle unitarity triangle @xcite phase @xmath9 ckm suppressed for decay mode @xmath3 not for @xmath7 cp violation effects accessible through latter mode by measuring time - dependent asymmetry of @xmath10 normalization fixed by measuring cp averaged rates of @xmath7 and @xmath3 u - spin symmetry measurements out of reach due to small branching ratio of @xmath7 overlapping mass peaks of @xmath5 and @xmath11 @xcite@xmath12 system two eigenstates different masses decay rates experimental determination mass @xmath13 rate difference @xmath14 for flavour dynamics standard model extensions measurement @xmath13 accessible through decays @xmath15 @xmath14 measured through decay channel @xmath4 signal samples @xmath17 generated monte carlo program pythia 5.7 @xcite@xmath18 meson into @xmath19 events passing atlas level-1 trigger requirements hadrons @xcite @xmath20 used for transverse momentum @xmath22 pseudorapidity @xmath22 meson decaying into @xmath23 retained branching ratio for decay @xmath24 ( @xmath25 ) % @xcite events selected satisfy atlas second level trigger second muon with @xmath26 gev @xmath27 signal samples 17,000 @xmath28 15,000 @xmath29 events full geant - based simulation response atlas inner detector electromagnetic calorimeter muon chambers not included real muons muon identification efficiencies 85% first muon 78% second 85% efficiency muon higher transverse momentum includes reconstruction level-1 trigger efficienciesj/@xmath18 reconstructed fitting opposite - charge muons level-2 selection muon 6 ( 3 ) gev common vertex calculating invariant mass @xmath32/d.o.f vertex fit less than 6.0 decay vertex@xmath18 detached from primary vertex by 250 @xmath33 m@xmath18 mass resolution 39 mev decay vertex 64 @xmath33 m efficiency reconstruction within three - standard - deviation mass window 79% if j/@xmath18 found analysis proceeded with @xmath22-reconstruction electromagnetic calorimeter mass distribution fig . 1 fitted with two gaussians obtained mass resolution @xmath34 total reconstruction efficiecny 2.3@xmath35 within two standard deviations from nominal mass@xmath18 combined @xmath36 @xmath37 mass resolution 67 mev both channels signal efficiency @xmath38 1@xmath35 within three standard deviations from nominal mass background sample of @xmath39 decays resulting efficiency less than 0.009@xmath35 table summarizes event rates for signals backgroundbranching ratios @xmath17 estimated signal background events luminosity 30 fb@xmath6 @xmath40 @xmath41 mixing angle measurement cp asymmetry @xmath42-system same - side jet - charge tagging method production @xmath42 @xmath43 jet charge defined @xmath44 @xmath45 charge @xmath46 particle @xmath47 momentum charged particles @xmath48 @xmath49 reconstructed b - meson included jet distance particle b - meson less than 0.8 particles not primary vertex excluded transverse impact parameter @xmath51 less than 1 cm @xmath52-coordinate particle within 5 cm @xmath52 primary vertex particles b - meson decay excluded reconstructed b - meson defined @xmath42 ( @xmath43 ) jet - charge @xmath53 @xmath54 ) @xmath55 tunable cut exponent @xmath56 optimized maximize tagging quality factor @xmath57 @xmath58 tagging dilution factor wrong - sign tags fraction wrong - sign tags @xmath61 tagging efficiencyoptimum parameters @xmath62 @xmath63 quality factor 3.85% with @xmath64 @xmath65 observable asymmetry @xmath66 @xmath67 combines experimental dilution factors @xmath68 ratio observed signal events to total decay time resolution @xmath69 = 0.073 ps error on cp asymmetry @xmath70 cabibbo angle height unitarity triangle @xmath8 @xmath4 mode clean experimental signature reconstruction same approach @xmath17 details @xmath74 leads to three final state helicity configurations linear combinations cp eigenstates different cp parities extraction cp - violating weak mixing phase @xmath75 helicity amplitudes separated three independent angles @xmath5 decay time initial @xmath5 flavour tagged in events atlas precision determined by detector response simulations input to angular analyses maximum likelihood monte carlo experimentslikelihood function @xmath76 defined @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79=0.5 untagged events @xmath80=1-r @xmath81=r if particle=r @xmath81=1-r anti - particle r wrong tag fraction b level background @xmath82 average decay rate probability density @xmath83 defined by @xmath84 @xmath85 four parameters @xmath5 decay oscillations @xmath86 four parameters helicity amplitudes @xmath90 strong phases @xmath92 @xmath93 angular functions @xmath94 in @xcite details analysis maximum likelihood fit @xmath86 @xmath87 weak phase @xmath95 simultaneously determined two helicity amplitude values strong phases mixing parameter @xmath96 measured in @xmath15 @xmath16 fixed eight parameters independent experimental resolution two strong phases prevented simultaneous determination final analysis two parametres fixed integral luminosity of 30 fb@xmath6 @xmath86 detrmined error 12@xmath35 precision @xmath95 depends on value @xmath96 proper time resolution fig discovery lines for atlas lhcb displayed in @xmath97 ) plane regions allowed by standard model left - right symmetric model @xcite atlas measure parameters bs meson system input for flavour dynamics standard model extensions signal decay mode @xmath3 reconstructed with atlas detector measurements possible branching fraction bs meson lifetime experimental resolution cp asymmetry shows to large asymmetries measurement @xmath8 angle compromised @xmath7 not observable after 3 years at luminosity @xmath98 atlas determine @xmath86 with relative errors of 12@xmath35 atlas discovery line fig . 3 precision high sensitive to new physics work performed within atlas collaboration members atlas b - physics working group skands jhep 0101:008,2001 driouichi observation decays @xmath99 in atlas experiment lhc 2002 sjstrand computer physics 82 ( 1994 ) 74 atlas collaboration detector physics performance technical design report vol i lhcc/9914 1999 ) @xmath100 @xmath101 c15 ( 2000 ) 1 2001 update 2002 edition pdg www pages http://pdg.lbl.govatlas collaboration detector physics performance design report ii/9915 1999 ohlsson malek melcher atlas calorimeter performance @xmath8 particles low transverse momentum isn-01.75 note-2001 - 021 feldman int a15 2000 ) 159 dighe dunietz lipkin rosner phys b369 1996 144 - 150 smizanska determination @xmath103 atlas impact non - zero @xmath103 @xmath5 studies atl phys-99 - 003 smizanska a446 138 - 142 2000 ball fleischer phys b475 2000 111 | 0.499988 | 3,173 | 1,684 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,393 | the bochum experimental enhancement of the d+d fusion rate in a deuterated metal matrix at low incident energies is explained by the quantum broadening of the momentum - energy dispersion relation and consequent modification of the high - momentum tail of the distribution function from an exponential to a power - law . , , , , , . | anomalous enhancement of the sub - barrier nuclear fusion reaction d(d , p)t in a deuterated metallic matrix has been experimentally observed at energies of the incident beam lower than few kev @xcite .
electron screening is not sufficient to explain this enhancement , and other quantitative explanations are missing @xcite .
in fact , the calculated ( adiabatic limit ) electron screening potential energy @xmath0 is 28 ev , but experiments show an exponential enhancement of the cross section at very low energies that would correspond to a screening energy @xmath1 ev @xcite .
similar behaviors are found in gaseous targets .
these discrepancies between the calculated @xmath0 and the experimentally inferred @xmath2 have not yet been understood @xcite ; these puzzling results could have important consequences also for the study of nuclear fusion in astrophysical environments @xcite . in this paper
we discuss a possible explanation of this enhancement which is based on the quantum - uncertainty dispersive effect between energy and momentum that was proposed by galitskij and yakimets @xcite and recently discussed and applied by starostin et al .
experimental data for the d(d , p)t reaction in a deuterated tantalium target @xcite are reported for beam energies in the range 4 - 20 kev .
the target is cooled with nitrogen at a temperature of 10 @xmath3c , which corresponds to a thermal energy @xmath4 ev .
data from ref .
@xcite are plotted in fig .
[ fig : raiolasigmav ] . in panel ( a ) of fig .
[ fig : raiolasigmav ] the experimental values of @xmath5 are plotted versus the center of mass energy @xmath6 .
since the incoming particles are not relativistic and the target particles are practically at rest , these data are plotted using @xmath7 and @xmath8 , where @xmath9 is the reduced mass ) .
the unscreened cross section can be written as : @xmath10 with @xmath11 .
the astrophysical factor @xmath12 should vary slowly in this energy range and is linearly approximated as @xmath13 , where @xmath14 and @xmath15 are extrapolated from energies @xmath16 kev ( see panel ( b ) in fig .
[ fig : raiolasigmav ] ) ; the values reported in ref .
@xcite are @xmath17 kev b and @xmath18 b. the interacting nuclei `` feel '' a effective potential barrier lower by an amount equal the electron screening potential @xmath19 : the resulting screened cross section is : @xmath20 when @xmath21 a correction factor @xmath22 can be factorized : @xmath23 where @xmath24 the electron screening potential computed in the adiabatic limit @xmath0 constitutes a theoretical upper limit for @xmath19 : @xmath25 for d+d reactions , fig .
[ fig : raiolasigmav ] compares the `` bare curve '' of eq .
( [ eq : barecrosssec ] ) and the `` screened curve '' ( @xmath26 ev ) of eq .
( [ eq : screenedcrosssec ] ) with the experimental data .
the screened cross section with @xmath27 ev underestimates the experimental data by about an order of magnitude in the few kev energy range ; the data could be fitted only by using an unphysical electron potential much larger than the adiabatic upper limit : @xmath28 ev @xmath29 .
@xmath30 equation ( [ eq : screenedcrosssec ] ) implies @xmath31 and , once again , only the screened curve with @xmath28 ev fits the data . in summary , there is experimental evidence of anomalously high values of low - energy fusion cross sections that would require electron screening potentials @xmath19 one order of magnitude larger than their adiabatic limit , if explained in terms of screening . in deuterated metal targets ,
the effect depends strongly on the metal @xcite ) .
values of @xmath32 are required also for describing experiments with gas target , but violations of the requirement @xmath33 are less strong than in metal targets .
these anomalous values of @xmath19 are substantially unexplained ; the screened potential approach is probably trying to mimic important processes that have been disregarded .
one should attempt to find alternative mechanisms that could reproduce the enhancement of the cross section at low energy .
the parameters of the experiments ( temperature and beam energy ) are such that thermal corrections can be neglected .
in fact if we average @xmath34 over a maxwellian distribution of velocity , the temperature correction factor @xmath35 can be estimated @xcite : @xmath36 @xmath37 for d+d reactions ( @xmath38 kev ) even at room temperature ( @xmath39 kev ) and at the lowest energies of the beam ( @xmath40 kev ) the maxwellian thermal factor @xmath41 . as showed by galitskij and yakimets @xcite many - body collisions
broaden the relation between momentum and energy of the particles .
since momentum rather than energy determines the scattering amplitude , the reaction cross section must be averaged over a momentum distribution that may differ from the energy one .
the reaction rate for a mono - energetic beam is : @xmath42 where the center of mass energy @xmath6 is function of the beam - particle and target - particle momentum , and the momentum distribution function of the target particles @xmath43 depends on thermal distribution of the target - particle energies @xmath44 , which we take to be maxwellian , and on the probability that a target particle with energy @xmath45 has momentum @xmath46 ( dispersion relation ) , @xmath47 .
quantum effects are responsible for the dispersion relation between energy and momentum @xmath47 not being a @xmath48-function , but a broader distribution . according to galitskij and yakimets @xcite
the relation between energy and momentum is a lorentzian @xmath49 with @xmath50 , where @xmath51 and @xmath52 are the collisional frequency and cross section , while @xmath53 and @xmath54 are the colliding particles density and velocity . assuming that the collision cross section could be approximated by the bare coulomb cross section @xmath55
, the resulting @xmath56 is @xmath57 where the relations @xmath58 and @xmath59 have been used with @xmath60 the total density and @xmath61 the ( average ) atomic number . in the asymptotic regime @xmath62 ,
relevant for the particles that undergo fusion , the maxwellian contribution @xmath63 is negligible and the distribution of momenta becomes @xmath64 since only particles in the high - energy tail of the distribution @xmath62 contribute to the fusion rate , the quantum effect contribution @xmath65 is the only important contribution to the rate .
more in general , the fact that the relation between energy and momentum is not a @xmath48-function results in a distribution of momentum @xmath66 with a power - law asymptotic behavior in spite of the energy distribution @xmath67 being exponential .
this power - law tail becomes mostly important for reactions whose cross sections select high - momentum particles .
this quantum contribution can be calculated numerically and we are also developing useful analytical approximations : we shall report elsewhere the derivation of these approximations and their comparison with the exact numerical integration . in the following we give some preliminary results using a parameterization that is motivated by the form of eq .
( [ eq : qefftercorr ] ) and that can be used to qualitatively estimate the importance of such quantum broadening of the momentum distribution . if we use @xmath68 as an upper bound for @xmath69 in the integral in eq .
( [ eq : qefftercorr ] ) ( the precise value of the low bound is inconsequential ) and work in the relevant approximation that the target particles have energies lower than the beam particles , we obtain the following partial parameterization for the dominant contribution @xmath70 in fig . [
fig : enhancfactcompared ] we have plotted the ratio @xmath71 with @xmath72 given by eq .
( [ eq : qefflowenapprox ] ) for three different values of @xmath73 .
the function @xmath74 shows an evident enhancement at low energy starting from the region of 1 - 2 kev in qualitative agreement with experiments .
the threshold below which this enhancement becomes important depends on @xmath75 .
we are completing a more detailed calculation that does not require the introduction of the parameter @xmath73 and that , therefore , can better test the relevance of this quantum effect for the experimental results .
the theory of galitskij and yakimets predicts that quantum indeterminacy broadens the relation between energy and momentum .
we have performed a preliminary calculation to estimate the effect of this broadening on the momentum distribution of deuteron in metals and , therefore , on the cross section of the reaction d(d , p)t .
this calculation shows that this quantum effect should give an important enhancement of the cross section at low energies similar to the one observed in the bochum experiments .
a more quantitative comparison between theory and experiments requires the use of more sophisticated analytical or numerical analyses @xcite and the inclusion of the effects of screening both on the fusion cross section and on the ion - collision cross section .
this further work is being completed and will be published in the near future .
00 f. raiola _ et al .
_ , eur .
j. * a 13 * ( 2002 ) 377 .
f. raiola _ et al .
_ , phys .
* b 547 * ( 2002 ) 193 .
g. fiorentini , c. rolfs , f. l. villante and b. ricci , phys .
c * 67 * ( 2003 ) 014603 [ arxiv : astro - ph/0210537 ] .
m. coraddu , g. kaniadakis , a. lavagno , m. lissia , g. mezzorani and p. quarati , braz .
j. phys .
* 29 * ( 1999 ) 153 [ arxiv : nucl - th/9811081 ] .
m. coraddu , m. lissia , g. mezzorani and p. quarati , arxiv : nucl - th/0012002 . v. m. galitskii and v. v. yakimets , jept * 24 * ( 1967 ) 637 .
a. n. starostin , a. b. mironov , n. l. aleksandrov , j. n. fisch , and r. m. kulsrud , physica a * 305 * ( 2002 ) 287 .
a. n. starostin , v. i. savchenko , and n. j. fisch , phys .
a * 274 * ( 2000 ) 64 .
v. i. savchenko , arxiv : astro - ph/9904289 .
m. coraddu , g. mezzorani , yu .
v. petrushevich , p. quarati , and a. n. starostin , physica a , this issue . | enhancement sub - barrier nuclear fusion reaction d p in deuterated metallic matrix observed at energies lower than kev electron screening not sufficient quantitative explanations missing calculated electron screening potential energy @xmath0 is 28 ev experiments show exponential enhancement cross section at low energies screening energy @xmath1 ev similar behaviors in gaseous targets discrepancies between calculated @xmath0 inferred @xmath2 results could for study nuclear fusion astrophysical environments possible explanation enhancement based on quantum - uncertainty dispersive effect between energy momentum proposed by galitskij yakimets starostin et al experimental data d(d p)t reaction in deuterated tantalium target beam energies 4 - 20 kev target cooled with nitrogen at 10 @xmath3c thermal energy @xmath4 ev data plotted in fig . experimental values of @xmath5 versus mass energy @xmath6 target particles at rest data plotted using @xmath7 and @xmath8 @xmath9 reduced mass unscreened cross section written as @xmath10 with @xmath11astrophysical factor @xmath12 energy range approximated as @xmath13 @xmath14 extrapolated from energies @xmath16 kev panel fig values in @xcite are @xmath17 kev b @xmath18 b interacting nuclei potential barrier lower electron screening potential @xmath19 screened cross section is @xmath20 @xmath21 correction factor @xmath22 factorized @xmath23 @xmath24 electron screening potential adiabatic limit @xmath0 theoretical upper limit for @xmath19 @xmath25 for d+d reactions fig compares bare curve screened curve experimental data screened cross section with @xmath27 ev underestimates experimental data kev energy range data fitted unphysical electron potential larger than adiabatic upper limit : @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 equation implies @xmath31 screened curve with @xmath28 ev fits data experimental evidence of high values low - energy fusion cross sections electron screening potentials @xmath19 larger than adiabatic limit in deuterated metal targets effect depends on metal @xcitevalues @xmath32 required experiments gas target violations @xmath33 less strong metal targets anomalous values @xmath19 unexplained screened potential approach processes disregarded attempt alternative mechanisms enhancement cross section low energy parameters experiments temperature beam energy thermal corrections neglected average @xmath34 over maxwellian distribution velocity temperature correction factor @xmath35 estimated @xmath36 @xmath37 d+d reactions @xmath38 kev room temperature @xmath39 kev lowest energies @xmath40 kev maxwellian thermal factor @xmath41 many - body collisions broaden relation momentum energy particles momentum determines scattering amplitude reaction cross section averaged over momentum distribution energy reaction rate mono - energetic beam @xmath42 center of mass energy @xmath6 function beam - particle target - particle momentum momentum distribution target particles depends on thermal distribution target - particle energies @xmath44 probability target particle energy @xmath45 momentum @xmath46 relation @xmath47 quantum effects responsible dispersion relation energy momentum-function broader distributiongalitskij yakimets relation between energy momentum lorentzian @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 collisional frequency cross section @xmath53 colliding particles density velocity collision cross section approximated by bare coulomb cross section @xmath55 resulting @xmath56 @xmath57 relations @xmath58 @xmath59 used @xmath60 total density @xmath61 average atomic number asymptotic regime @xmath62 fusion maxwellian contribution @xmath63 negligible distribution momenta becomes @xmath64 particles high - energy tail contribute fusion rate quantum effect contribution @xmath65 only important relation between energy momentum not @xmath48-function distribution momentum @xmath66 power - law asymptotic behavior energy distribution @xmath67 exponential power - law tail important for reactions high - momentum particles quantum contribution calculated numerically developing analytical approximations comparison numerical integration preliminary results using parameterization motivated by form eq estimate importance of quantum broadening momentum distribution @xmath68 upper bound for @xmath69 integral eqeq : qefftercorr ] precise value low bound inconsequential approximation target particles energies lower than beam particles obtain partial parameterization for dominant contribution @xmath70 fig . enhancfactcompared plotted ratio @xmath71 with @xmath72 qefflowenapprox three values of @xmath73 function @xmath74 shows enhancement at low energy 1 - 2 kev agreement with experiments threshold enhancement important depends on @xmath75 completing detailed calculation introduction parameter @xmath73 test relevance quantum effect for experimental results theory galitskij yakimets predicts quantum indeterminacy broadens relation between energy momentum preliminary calculation effect broadening on momentum distribution of deuteron in metals cross section reaction d(d p)t calculation shows quantum effect important enhancement cross section at low energies bochum experiments quantitative comparison requires sophisticated analytical analyses @xcite effects screening on fusion cross section ion - collision cross section further work completed published future raiola _ et al . 13 ( 2002 ) 377 phys 547 ( 2002 ) 193 fiorentini rolfs villante b. ricci phys 67 * 2003 ) 014603 astro - ph/0210537. coraddu kaniadakis lavagno lissia mezzorani p. quarati . 29 1999 ) 153 nucl - th/9811081 ]. coraddu lissia mezzorani p. quarati nucl - th/0012002. galitskii. yakimets jept 24 * ( 1967 ) 637. starostin mironov. aleksandrov n. fisch. kulsrud 305 * 2002 ) 287 starostin savchenko j. fisch phys . 274 * 2000 ) 64 savchenko astro - ph/9904289 coraddu. mezzorani. petrushevich p. quarati. starostin physica issue | 0.354437 | 2,523 | 1,271 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,398 | we consider a smart grid with an independent system operator ( iso ) , and distributed aggregators who have energy storage and purchase energy from the iso to serve its customers .
all the entities in the system are _ foresighted _ : each aggregator seeks to minimize its own _ long - term _
payments for energy purchase and operational costs of energy storage by deciding how much energy to buy from the iso , and the iso seeks to minimize the _ long - term _ total cost of the system ( e.g. energy generation costs and the aggregators costs ) by dispatching the energy production among the generators .
the decision making of the foresighted entities is complicated for two reasons .
first , the information is decentralized among the entities : the iso does not know the aggregators states ( i.e. their energy consumption requests from customers and the amount of energy in their storage ) , and each aggregator does not know the other aggregators states or the iso s state ( i.e. the energy generation costs and the status of the transmission lines ) .
second , the coupling among the aggregators is unknown to them due to their limited information .
specifically , each aggregator s energy purchase affects the price , and hence the payments of the other aggregators .
however , none of them knows how its decision influences the price because the price is determined by the iso based on its state .
we propose a design framework in which the iso provides each aggregator with a conjectured future price , and each aggregator distributively minimizes its own long - term cost based on its conjectured price as well as its locally - available information . the proposed framework can achieve the social optimum despite being decentralized and involving complex coupling among the various entities interacting in the system .
simulation results show that the proposed foresighted demand side management achieves significant reduction in the total cost , compared to the optimal myopic demand side management ( up to 60% reduction ) , and the foresighted demand side management based on the lyapunov optimization framework ( up to 30% reduction ) . | the power systems are undergoing drastic changes on both the supply side and the demand side . on the supply side , an increasing amount of renewable energy ( e.g. wind energy , solar energy ) is penetrating the power systems .
the adoption of renewable energy reduces the environmental damage caused by conventional energy generation , but also introduces high fluctuation and uncertainty in energy generation on the supply side . to cope with this uncertainty in energy generation , the demand side is deploying various solutions ,
one of which is the use of energy storage @xcite . in this paper
, we study the optimal demand side management ( dsm ) strategy in the presence of energy storage , and the corresponding optimal economic dispatch strategy .
specifically , we consider a power system consisting of energy generators on the supply side , an independent system operator ( iso ) that operates the system , and multiple aggregators and their customers on the demand side . on the supply side ,
the iso receives energy purchase requests from the aggregators as well as reports of ( parameterized ) energy generation cost functions from the generators , and based on these , dispatches the energy generators and determines the unit energy prices . on the demand side ,
the aggregators are located in different geographical areas and provide energy for residential customers ( e.g. households ) or for commercial customers ( e.g. an office building ) in the neighborhood . in the literature , the term `` dsm '' has been broadly used for different decision problems on the demand side . for example , some papers ( see @xcite@xcite for representative papers ) focus on the interaction between one aggregator and its customers , and refer to dsm as determining the power consumption schedules of the users .
some papers @xcite@xcite focus on how multiple aggregators @xcite@xcite or a single aggregator @xcite@xcite purchases energy from the iso based on the energy consumption requests from their customers .
our paper pertains to the second category of research works .
the key feature that sets apart our paper from most existing works @xcite@xcite is that all the decision makers in the system are _
foresighted_. each aggregator seeks to minimize its _ long - term _ cost , consisting of its operational cost of energy storage and its payment for energy purchase .
in contrast , in most existing works @xcite@xcite , the aggregators are _ myopic _ and seek to minimizing their _ short - term _
( e.g. one - day or even hourly ) cost . in the presence of energy storage ,
foresighted dsm strategies can achieve much lower costs than myopic dsm strategies because the current decisions of the aggregators will affect their future costs .
for example , an aggregator can purchase more energy from the iso than that requested from its customers , and store the unused energy in the energy storage for future use , if it anticipates that the future energy price will be high .
hence , the current purchase from the aggregators will affect how much they will purchase in the future . in this case
, it is optimal for the entities to make _ foresighted _ decisions , taking into account the impact of their current decisions on the future .
since the aggregators deploy foresighted dsm strategies , it is also optimal for the iso to make foresighted economic dispatch , in order to minimize the _ long - term _ total cost of the system , consisting of the long - term cost of energy generation and the aggregators long - term operational cost .
note that although some works @xcite@xcite assume that the aggregator is foresighted , they study the decision problem of a _ single _ aggregator and do not consider the economic dispatch problem of the iso .
when there are multiple aggregators in the system ( which is the case in practice ) , this approach neglects the impact of aggregators decisions on each other , which leads to suboptimal solutions in terms of minimizing the total cost of the system . when the iso and _ multiple _ aggregators make _ foresighted _ decisions , it is difficult to obtain the optimal foresighted strategies for two reasons
. first , the information is decentralized .
the total cost depends on the generation cost functions ( e.g. the speed of wind for wind energy generation , the amount of sunshine for solar energy generation , and so on ) , the status of the transmission lines ( e.g. the flow capacity of the transmission lines ) , the amount of electricity in the energy storage , and the demand from the customers , all of which may change due to supply and demand uncertainty .
however , none of the entities knows all the above information : the iso knows only the generation cost functions and the status of the transmission lines , and each aggregator knows only the status of its own energy storage and the demand from its own customers .
hence , the dsm strategy needs to be decentralized , such that each entity can make decisions solely based on its locally - available information .
second , the aggregators are coupled in a complicated way that is unknown to them .
specifically , each aggregator s purchase affects the prices , and thus the payments of the other aggregators .
however , the price is determined by the iso based on the generation cost functions and the status of the transmission lines , neither of which is known to any aggregator .
hence , each aggregator does not know how its purchase will influence the price , which makes it difficult for the aggregator to make the optimal decision . to overcome the difficulty resulting from information decentralization and complicated coupling , we propose a decentralized dsm strategy based on conjectured prices . specifically , each aggregator makes decisions based on its conjectured price , and its local information on the status of its energy storage and the demand from its customers . in other words
, each aggregator summarizes all the unavailable information into its conjectured price .
note , however , that the price is determined based on the generation cost functions and the status of the transmission lines , which is only known to the iso .
hence , the aggregators conjectured prices are determined by the iso .
we propose a simple online algorithm for the iso to update the conjectured prices based on its local information , and prove that by using the algorithm , the iso obtains the optimal conjectured prices under which the aggregators ( foresighted ) best responses minimize the total cost of the system .
.comparisons with related works on demand - side management . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
in this paper , we proposed a methodology to perform optimal foresighted dsm strategies that minimize the long - term total cost of the power system .
we overcame the hurdles of information decentralization and complicated coupling in the system , by decoupling the entities decision problems using conjectured prices .
we proposed an online algorithm for the iso to update the conjectured prices , such that the conjectured prices can converge to the optimal ones , based on which the entities make optimal decisions that minimize the long - term total cost .
we prove that the proposed method can achieve the social optimum , and demonstrate through simulations that the proposed foresighted dsm significantly reduces the total cost compared to the optimal myopic dsm ( up to 60% reduction ) , and the foresighted dsm based on the lyapunov optimization framework ( up to 30% reduction ) .
due to limited space , we give a detailed proof sketch .
the proof consists of three key steps .
first , we prove that by penalizing the constraints @xmath0 into the objective function , the decision problems of different entities can be decentralized .
hence , we can derive optimal decentralized strategies for different entities under given lagrangian multipliers .
then we prove that the update of lagrangian multipliers converges to the optimal ones under which there is no duality gap between the primal problem and the dual problem , due to the convexity assumptions made on the cost functions .
finally , we validate the calculation of the conjectured prices .
first , suppose that there is a central controller that knows everything about the system .
then the optimal strategy to the design problem should result in a value function @xmath1 that satisfies the following bellman equation : for all @xmath2 , we have @xmath3 defining a lagrangian multiplier @xmath4 associated with the constraints @xmath5 , and penalizing the constraints on the objective function , we get the following bellman equation : @xmath6 \right . \\ & & \left
. + \delta \cdot \sum_{s_0^\prime,\bm{s}^\prime } \rho(s_0^\prime,\bm{s}^\prime|s_0,\bm{s},a_0,\bm{a } ) v^{\bm{\lambda}}(s_0^\prime,\bm{s}^\prime ) \right\}. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the following lemma , we can prove that can be decomposed .
[ lemma : decompositionvaluefunction ] the optimal value function @xmath7 that solves can be decomposed as @xmath8 for all @xmath9 , where @xmath10 can be computed by entity @xmath11 locally by solving @xmath12 + \delta \cdot \sum_{s_i^\prime } \rho_i(s_i^\prime|s_i , a_i ) v_i^{\bm{\lambda}}(s_i^\prime ) \right\ } \end{array}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this can be proved by the independence of different entities states and by the decomposition of the constraints @xmath0 .
specifically , in a dc power flow model , the constraints @xmath0 are linear with respect to the actions @xmath13 . as a result
, we can decompose the constraints as @xmath14 .
we have proved that by penalizing the constraints @xmath0 using lagrangian multiplier @xmath15 , different entities can compute the optimal value function @xmath16 distributively .
due to the convexity assumptions on the cost functions , we can show that the primal problem is convex .
hence , there is no duality gap . in other words , at the optimal lagrangian multipliers @xmath17 , the corresponding value function @xmath18 is equal to the optimal value function @xmath19 of the primal problem .
it is left to show that the update of lagrangian multipliers converge to the optimal ones .
it is a well - known result in dynamic programming that @xmath20 is convex and piecewise linear in @xmath15 , and that the subgradient is @xmath0 .
note that we use the sample mean of @xmath21 and @xmath22 , whose expectation is the true mean value of @xmath21 and @xmath22 . since @xmath0 is linear in @xmath21 and @xmath22 , the subgradient calculated based on the sample mean has the same mean value as the subgradient calculated based on the true mean values . in other words , the update is a stochastic subgradient descent method .
it is well - known that when the stepsize @xmath23 , the stochastic subgradient descent will converge to the optimal @xmath24 .
h. mohsenian - rad , v. w. s. wong , j. jatskevich , r. schober , and a. leon - garcia , `` autonomous demand - side management based on game - theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid , '' _ ieee trans .
smart grid _ , vol . 1 , no
320331 , 2011 .
kim , s. ren , m. van der schaar , and j .- w .
lee , `` bidirectional energy trading and residential load scheduling with electric vehicles in the smart grid , '' _ ieee j. sel .
areas commun .
, special issue on smart grid communications series _ , vol .
31 , no . 7 , pp
. 12191234 , jul .
2013 .
italo atzeni , luis g. ordez , gesualdo scutari , daniel p. palomar , and javier r. fonollosa , `` noncooperative and cooperative optimization of distributed energy generation and storage in the demand - side of the smart grid , '' _ ieee trans . on signal process .
24542472 , may 2013 .
italo atzeni , luis g. ordez , gesualdo scutari , daniel p. palomar , and javier r. fonollosa , `` demand - side management via distributed energy generation and storage optimization , '' _ ieee trans . on smart grids _ ,
2 , pp . 866876 , june 2013 . e. altmam , k. avrachenkov , n. bonneau , m. debbah , r. el - azouzi , d. s. menasche , `` constrained cost - coupled stochastic games with independent state processes , '' _
technical report_. available : http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/konstantin.avratchenkov/pubs/constrgame.pdf j. hrner , t. sugaya , s. takahashi , and n. vielle , `` recursive methods in discounted stochastic games : an algorithm for @xmath27 and a folk theorem , '' _ econometrica _ , vol .
79 , no . 4 , pp .
12771318 , 2011 . | power systems undergoing changes supply and demand side supply side increasing renewable energy ( penetrating power systems adoption renewable energy reduces environmental damage conventional generation introduces high fluctuation uncertainty in energy generation supply side demand side deploying solutions use of energy storage @xcite in paper study optimal demand side management ( dsm ) strategy energy storage optimal economic dispatch strategy consider power system of energy generators supply side independent system operator iso ) multiple aggregators customers demand side supply side iso receives energy purchase requests aggregators reports of energy generation cost functions from generators dispatches energy generators determines unit energy prices demand side aggregators located in different geographical areas provide energy for residential or commercial customers literature term `` dsm '' used for decision problems demand side some papers focus on interaction between one aggregator customers to dsm determining power consumption schedules some papers focus on multiple aggregators or single purchases energy from iso based on energy consumption requests customers our paper pertains to second category research workskey feature our paper from works @xcite is all decision makers in system are foresighted each aggregator seeks to long - term cost operational cost of energy storage payment for energy purchase in most existing works @xcite aggregators are myopic short - term cost in energy storage foresighted dsm strategies can achieve lower costs than myopic current decisions affect future costs aggregator can purchase more energy from iso than store unused energy in energy storage for future use if anticipates future energy price high current purchase purchase future optimal for entities to make foresighted decisions impact current decisions on future aggregators deploy foresighted dsm strategies optimal for iso to make foresighted economic dispatch to minimize long - term total cost system cost of energy generation operational cost some works @xcite assume aggregator foresighted study decision problem of single aggregator do not consider economic dispatch problem of iso when multiple aggregators in this approach neglects impact of decisions leads to suboptimal solutions minimizing total costiso and multiple aggregators make foresighted decisions difficult to obtain optimal strategies for two reasons information decentralized total cost depends on generation cost functions speed wind sunshine for status of transmission lines flow capacity electricity in energy storage demand from customers may change due to supply demand uncertainty none entities knows all information iso knows only generation cost functions status transmission lines each aggregator knows only status energy storage demand from customers dsm strategy needs decentralized each entity decisions based on locally - available information aggregators coupled complicated unknown to them each aggregator s purchase affects prices payments of other aggregators price determined by iso based on generation cost functions status transmission lines neither known to any aggregator each aggregator know purchase price difficult to make optimal decision to overcome difficulty decentralization propose decentralized dsm strategy based on conjectured prices each aggregator makes decisions based on conjectured price local information status energy storage demand from customers each aggregator summarizes unavailable information into conjectured priceprice determined based on generation cost status transmission lines known to iso aggregators conjectured prices determined by iso propose online algorithm for iso to update prices based local information iso obtains optimal prices minimize total cost system.comparisons with works on demand - side management proposed methodology to perform optimal foresighted dsm strategies minimize long - term total cost power system overcame information decentralization complicated coupling decoupling entities decision problems using conjectured prices proposed online algorithm for iso to update conjectured prices converge to optimal ones optimal decisions minimize long - term total cost proposed method social optimum through simulations proposed foresighted dsm reduces total cost compared to optimal myopic dsm up to 60% reduction lyapunov optimization framework up to 30% reduction detailed proof sketch proof three steps by penalizing constraints @xmath0 into objective function decision problems of entities be decentralized derive optimal decentralized strategies for different entities under lagrangian multipliersprove update lagrangian multipliers converges to optimal ones no duality gap between primal dual problem due to convexity assumptions cost functions validate calculation conjectured prices suppose central controller knows system optimal strategy design problem value function @xmath1 satisfies bellman equation @xmath2 @xmath3 defining lagrangian multiplier @xmath4 constraints @xmath5 penalizing constraints objective function bellman equation : @xmath6 \right\left\delta \cdot \sum_{s_0^\prime,\bm{s}^\prime(s_0^\prime,\bm{s}^\prime{\bm{\lambda}}^\prime\prime prove decomposed decompositionvaluefunction optimal value function @xmath7 solves decomposed as @xmath8 for @xmath9 @xmath10 computed by entity @xmath11 locally solving @xmath12\delta\cdot \sum_{s_i^\prime_i(s_i^\prime{\bm{\lambda}}(s_i^\prime ){array}{aligned proved by independence of entities decomposition of constraints @xmath0 in dc power flow model constraints @xmath0 linear actions @xmath13 decompose constraints as @xmath14 penalizing constraints @xmath0 using lagrangian multiplier @xmath15 entities compute optimal value function @xmath16 distributively convexity assumptions cost functions primal problem convex no duality gap optimal lagrangian multipliers @xmath17 corresponding value function @xmath18 equal to optimal value function @xmath19 primal update of lagrangian multipliers converge to optimal ones @xmath20 convex linear in @xmath15 subgradient is @xmath0 sample mean of @xmath21 @xmath22 true mean value @xmath0 linear in subgradient calculated based on sample mean same value as true mean update is stochastic subgradient descent method stepsize @xmath23 stochastic subgradient descent to optimal @xmath24 h. mohsenian - rad v w s. wong. jatskevich r. schober aleon garcia autonomous demand side management game - theoretic energy consumption scheduling future smart grid smart grid vol 1 no 320331 2011 kim s. ren van der schaar lee bidirectional energy trading residential load scheduling electric vehicles smart grid special issue smart grid vol . 31 no 7 pp 12191234 jul 2013 italo atzeni luis ordez gesualdo scutari daniel palomar javier fonollosa noncooperative cooperative optimization distributed energy generation storage demand smart grid process 24542472 may 2013 demand - side management distributed energy generation storage optimization smart grids 2 pp 866876 june 2013 e. altmam avrachenkov bonneau debbah el - azouzi menasche constrained cost - coupled stochastic games independent state processes technical report http://www-sop.inria.fr/konstantin.avratchenkov/constrgame.pdf j. hrner t. sugaya takahashi n. vielle recursive methods discounted stochastic games algorithm @xmath27 folk theorem79 4 12771318 2011 | 0.499288 | 2,812 | 1,377 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,402 | we have self - organized versatile magnetic nanowires , with variable period and adjustable magnetic anisotropy energy ( mae ) .
first , using the kinetic roughening of w(110 ) uniaxial templates of trenches were grown on commercial sapphire wafers . unlike most templates used for self - organization , those have a variable period , are demonstrated here .
fe deposition then results in the formation of wires in the trenches .
the magnitude of mae could be engineered up or down by changing the capping- or underlayer , in turn affecting the mean superparamagnetic temperature , raised to so far .
0.5 in 0.5 in the bottom - up approach is promising for the fabrication of nanostructures at moderate cost , with better resolution and less microscopic defects than with lithography .
in epitaxial self - organization ( so ) the building blocks are atoms that aggregate to each other during growth , a process that can be engineered to fabricate wires and dots with lateral dimensions from the micron size@xcite down to the atomic size@xcite .
the interest of so for fundamental research is often the narrow size dispersion@xcite , so that macroscopic measurements reveal the properties of one single nanostructure .
issues like the increase of orbital momentum and magnetic anisotropy energy ( mae ) at atomic edges or kinks have been addressed@xcite .
concerning applications it is sometimes argued that so arrays could be used by addressing single nanostructures one by one , to store one bit of information for example . a more realistic view is the use of the array as a material with specific properties arising from the nanoscale .
this is the case of semiconductor quantum dots with lasing properties@xcite .
do magnetic so systems meet the requirements of applied materials ?
a prerequisite is that some versatility of geometrical as well as physical properties is achieved , like tuning the magnitude of the mae .
we focus here on the fabrication and properties of wires , which lie at the background of the fast - developing field of spin electronics making use of the propagation of domain walls in wires for storage or logics devices@xcite .
so magnetic wires are often achieved by step - decoration of vicinal surfaces@xcite .
this approach is not versatile as a new crystal has to be prepared with a specific miscut whenever the period needs to be changed .
templates resulting from kinetic effects are potentially more versatile as the period can be changed with processing parameters , like temperature .
this has been explored using ion etching under grazing incidence to create ripples on surfaces , independently of crystalline directions@xcite .
however a significant control of the period has not been demonstrated so far .
here we explore a new approach , based on the growth of body - centered - cubic ( 110 ) materials on nominally - flat saphir yielding parallel trenches with an adjustable period , which we then use to grow magnetic nanowires .
we could tune the magnitude of the mae of the wires using suitably - chosen capping layers or underlayers .
the use of commercial wafers while achieving some control on both the period and the mae represents a significant advancement in the versatility of so nanowires .
the samples were grown in a set of ultra - high vacuum chambers using pulsed - laser deposition with a nd - yag laser ( @xmath0{nm}$ ] ) .
the chambers are equipped with a quartz microbalance , sample heating and a translating mask for the fabrication of wedge - shaped samples .
a 10 kev reflection high energy electron diffraction ( rheed ) setup with a ccd camera synchronized with laser shots permits operation during deposition . an omicron room - temperature scanning tunneling microscope ( stm-1 ) and an auger electron spectrometer ( aes ) are available .
the metallic films are grown on sapphire _ nominally - flat _ @xmath1 commercial wafers .
a detailed description of the chambers and growth procedures can be found in @xcite .
the magnetic measurements were performed ex - situ on -mo - capped samples , with a quantum design superconducting quantum interference device ( squid ) magnetometer . ordered arrays of wires were obtained in three steps , consisting of the fabrication of 1 . a non - magnetic flat buffer layer ; 2 . a non - magnetic template displaying a uniaxial array of trenches ; 3 . fe wires by layer - by - layer deposition at the bottom of the trenches .
the first step is the preparation of a smooth buffer layer . a seed layer of mo ( nominal thickness @xmath2{nm}$ ] ) followed by w ( @xmath3{nm}$ ] )
are deposited on sapphire at room temperature ( rt ) followed by annealing at @xmath4c .
this yields a @xmath5 surface of quality similar to that of metal single crystals , with atomically - flat terrasses of width up to hundreds of nanometers@xcite .
the second step consists of the preparation of a non - magnetic template .
it was inspired by reports of the kinetic uniaxial roughening of films of the bcc elements fe(110)@xcite and w(110)@xcite during homoepitaxy at moderate temperature , explained by anisotropic diffusion along the steps and the occurrence of an ehrlich - schwoebel barrier .
a ( resp .
c ) shows the topography of a w(110 ) layer obtained upon deposition at @xmath6 ( resp .
following nucleation at @xmath7 and subsequent growth at @xmath6 ) . a uniaxial array of trenches aligned along @xmath8 $ ] is thus obtained , with a period of @xmath9 ( resp .
@xmath10 ) .
the stm cross - sections shown as insets reveal a depth of @xmath11 ( resp . ) .
the structure of the trenches can be probed using rheed with the electron beam along @xmath8 $ ] .
the diffraction patterns consist of arrows whose half - angle reveals the slope of the microfacets .
the arrows are much sharper for trenches of larger depth because the coherence length along the facets is increased .
this allows us to determine accurately the angle of the facets to @xmath12 , in perfect agreement with the triangular - like stm cross - sections of c. this angle is unambiguously ascribed to facets of type @xmath13 , with @xmath14 expected .
the monitoring of rheed patterns during growth shows that @xmath15 is a stationary value , reached after a few nanometers of nominal thickness .
the occurrence of a stationary angle garanties that the shape of the trenches is not influenced by fluctuations of the width of the trenches , and thus displays essentially no distribution .
this is crucial as the dispersion of mae increases tremendously for nanosized systems in relation with the distribution of structural environments@xcite .
the existence of a stationary angle was postulated in ref.@xcite , however the analysis concluded to facets of type @xmath16 with @xmath17 for w. the discrepancy may come from the fact that the leed patterns used in ref.@xcite were broad because trenches with a small period were studied .
we could produce templates with the same facets for mo , nb , v and ta by deposition at room temperature .
w(110 ) templates : ( a , c ) @xmath18 stm images of templates with small ( a ) and large ( c ) period , see text ( b , d ) rheed patterns along the @xmath8 $ ] azimuth for surfaces a and c , resp .
the sample lies vertical , on the left of the patterns .
, width=306 ] the third step consists of the fabrication of wires .
fe is deposited on the templates at @xmath6 , for which layer - by - layer growth occurs with pld on a smooth surface@xcite . for all deposits
we have used w templates , which remain perfectly stable up to @xmath19 . for templates of small period
the surface gradually smoothes and becomes essentially flat for @xmath20(atomic layers ; not shown here ) .
the details of the early stages of growth are easier to investigate for templates of large period . for these stm cross - sections
reveal a flat level at the bottom of the trenches , suggesting a progressive filling and thus yielding fe wires with a triangular cross - section .
disconnected wires can be formed up to @xmath21 , beyond which percolation sets in for the period .
( a ) @xmath22 stm image of wires fe()/w ( b ) cross - section along the line shown in a ( c ) cross - section along the line shown in c ( same scales).,width=321 ] we report below the magnetic properties of fe wires prepared on w(110 ) templates with a mean period of and an fe nominal thickness of .
the mean thickness and width of the wires are and , respectively , as deduced from stm . for mo / fe / w wires the easy axis of magnetization lies in - the - plane along the wires , along [ 001]a .
the mae is deduced from loops along [ 1@xmath230 ] like @xmath24{j / m^{3}}$ ] at @xmath25 .
@xmath26 originates from the sum of several contributions , among which only the dipolar energy @xmath27 can be estimated reliably .
other sources of mae are surface ( nel - type ) expected to favor the [ 1@xmath230 ] direction for the ( bottom ) fe / w interface@xcite and [ 001 ] for the ( top ) mo / fe interface@xcite , step - edge for fe / w , expected to favor [ 1@xmath230 ] @xcite ; magneto - elastic unlike the case of thin films , here the large density of steps is expected to induce a significant out - of - plane mismatch and shear stress , so that no figure or even sign can be reliably predicted ; finally the bulk fe mae is negligible .
surprisingly @xmath28 for this sample despite this complex situation , similarly to ( fe , ag ) self - organized arrays of wires@xcite .
the loops measured at different temperatures with @xmath29 $ ] have a rather square shape , and at remanence full saturation is observed b. the coercivity continuously decreases with temperature while @xmath30 remains essentially unchanged , suggesting a superparamagnetic behavior . the ultimate blocking temperature determined by the `` zero field cooling / field cooling '' ( zfc - fc ) process is @xmath31{k}$ ] d. the _ mean _ value of @xmath32 is around @xmath33{k}$ ] , defined as half - way up the zero - field cooling remagnetization curve . in the following we report on the use of surface mae to tailor the magnitude of the mae of the wires and
move towards features that would be required for applications like recording media , like functionality at room temperature and adjustment of mae .
first , the very same wires were fabricated after inserting a @xmath34-thick underlayer of mo on the w trenches .
the magnetic easy axis is again along the wires , however its magnitude is increased , which is consistent as fe / mo interfaces favor alignement of magnetization along @xmath8$]@xcite .
this brings the mean @xmath32 from @xmath35 without underlayer to @xmath36 with underlayer .
the coercive field is increased at all temperatures , compare . on the reverse @xmath32
is lowered to @xmath37 for al / fe / w .
magnetization curves of fe ( ) wires with period .
mo / fe / w wires ( a ) at in - plane along @xmath8 $ ] and @xmath38 $ ] ( b ) in - plane along @xmath8 $ ] at different temperatures ; ( c ) same as b , however for mo / fe / mo / w wires , see text ; ( d - f ) in - plane field - cooled ( fc ) and zero - field - cooled ( zfc ) magnetization of ( d ) mo / fe / w ( e ) mo / fe / mo / w and ( f ) al / fe / w wires . a schematic illustration of the samples is shown in insets.,width=323 ] | we have demonstrated a novel route for the self - organization of arrays of planar nanowires on nominally - flat commercial wafers .
it is based on the fabrication of a template of trenches upon the deposition under kinetic limitations of a non - magnetic material along a surface of uniaxial symmetry , here w(110 ) , followed by the filling of the bottom of the trenches by a magnetic material under layer - by - layer deposition conditions , here fe .
periods in the range @xmath39 were demonstrated .
owing to a self - limiting effect the micro - facets are all of type @xmath40 with an angle of @xmath41 , which is promising for attaining a low distribution of physical properties . concerning magnetism the easy axis of magnetization lies in - the - plane along the wires .
we have demonstrated the possibility to tailor its magnitude using interface mae with different capping- or underlayers , bringing the _ mean _ blocking temperature to @xmath36 inserting an ultrathin underlayer of mo .
b. b. and a. r. acknowledge financial support from french rgion rhne - alpes ( mobility program ) , and fp6 eu - nsf program ( strp 016447 magdot ) , respectively . | demonstrated novel route self - organization planar nanowires on flat commercial wafers based on fabrication template trenches deposition limitations non - magnetic material uniaxial symmetry filling bottom trenches magnetic material layer - by - layer deposition periods range @xmath39 demonstrated self - limiting effect micro - facets type @xmath40 angle @xmath41 promising low distribution physical properties axis magnetization in - the - plane along wires demonstrated possibility tailor magnitude interface different capping underlayers mean blocking temperature to @xmath36 inserting ultrathin underlayer acknowledge financial support from french rgion rhne - alpes fp6 eu - nsf program | 0.072271 | 260 | 129 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,413 | we review the method of the calculation of multiloop integrals suggested in ref.@xcite . | the calculation of the multiloop integrals is important for the applications of the perturbative quantum field theory .
a number of the calculational methods has been developed for this purpose .
they roughly fall in to two categories : direct and indirect methods .
the former include feynman parameterization technique , mellin - barnes representation method , gegenbauer polynomials expansion in coordinate space .
the latter methods make use of the equations which are satisfied by the integrals .
the construction of these equations relies on the possibility to make the ibp reduction of the integrals under consideration to some finite set of the integrals , called `` master integrals '' . using this technique one can derive the differential equation for the integrals with several scales , or difference equation for the integrals with one scale .
these equations determine the integrals up to the solution of their homogeneous parts . in ref .
@xcite a method of multiloop integrals evaluation based on @xmath0 recurrence relations @xcite and @xmath0-analyticity was suggested ( dra method ) . since then it was applied to the calculation of various complicated integrals @xcite . in this contribution
we review this method .
assume that we are interested in the calculation of the @xmath1-loop integral depending on @xmath2 linearly independent external momenta @xmath3 .
there are @xmath4 scalar products depending on the loop momenta @xmath5 : @xmath6 where @xmath7 , @xmath8 , and @xmath9 .
the loop integral has the form@xmath10 where the scalar functions @xmath11 are linear polynomials with respect to @xmath12 .
the functions @xmath11 are assumed to be linearly independent and to form a complete basis in the sense that any non - zero linear combination of them depends on the loop momenta , and any @xmath12 can be expressed in terms of @xmath11 . the integral @xmath13 can be considered as a value of function of integer @xmath14-dimensional vector @xmath15 .
the set of points in @xmath16 ( and the corresponding set of integrals ) , having the same set of positive coordinates , form a _
sector_. thus the whole space is split into @xmath17 different sectors which can be conveniently labeled by their simplest elements .
e.g. , @xmath18 denotes the sector in which all points have exactly two first coordinates positive .
the points ( and the corresponding integrals ) in @xmath16 and the sectors form a partially ordered set with respect to the following relation .
we say that the point @xmath19 is _ simpler _ than the point @xmath20 iff all coordinates , positive in @xmath19 , are also positive in @xmath20 , but not vice versa .
it is convenient @xcite to introduce the operators @xmath21 which act on such functions as @xmath22 these operators respect the notion of sectors in a sense that the values of functions @xmath23 and @xmath24 in the point of some sector are expressed via the values of function @xmath25 in the same or simpler sectors . using these operators
, we can express the integral in @xmath26 dimensions via the integrals in @xmath0 dimensions @xcite : @xmath27 ^{-1}}{\left ( \mathcal{d}-e - l+1\right ) _ { l } } p\left ( b_{1},\ldots , b_{n}\right ) j^{\left ( \mathcal{d}\right ) } \left ( \mathbf{n}\right)\ , , \label{eq : lowering}\\ j^{\left ( \mathcal{d}-2\right ) } \left ( \mathbf{n}\right ) & = ( \mu/2)^{l}q\left ( a_{1},\ldots , a_{n}\right)j^{\left ( \mathcal{d}\right ) } \left ( \mathbf{n}\right)\ , , \label{eq : raising}\ ] ] where @xmath28 for the euclidean / pseudoeuclidean case , and polynomials @xmath29 and @xmath30 are determined as @xmath31 these relations are the most useful when the integral in the left - hand side is master .
then , making the ibp reduction of the right - hand side of eqs .
, , one obtains difference equations for the master integrals . after this
, we obtain a linear combination of the integrals of the same , or simpler , sectors as the integral in the left - hand side of eqs . , .
we assume that the integrals of the the simpler sectors are already known at this stage , either by the same , or by some other method .
the ibp reduction makes eqs . , equivalent , so in what follows we consider only the lowering dimensional recurrence relation , obtained from eq .
we also change notations , writing @xmath32 where @xmath33 .
if a sector of the integral in the left - hand side contains only one master integral , the general form of the equation is the following : @xmath34 where @xmath35 is some rational function of @xmath36 and @xmath37 is a non - homogeneous part constructed of the simpler master integrals in @xmath38 dimensions .
if a sector contains several master integrals , it is convenient to consider them as a column - vector integral @xmath39 and to write the equations for them in a matrix form : @xmath40 where @xmath41 is some rational matrix ( i.e. , the matrix with coefficients being rational functions of @xmath36 ) . in order to write the general solution of this equation ,
we introduce the notion of indefinite sum and indefinite product . given the function @xmath42 , the _ indefinite sum _
@xmath43 is any function , satisfying the relation @xmath44 the indefinite sum @xmath43 is defined up to the addition of arbitrary periodic function of @xmath36 . if the function @xmath42 decreases faster than @xmath45 when @xmath46 and/or @xmath47 , one can write @xmath48 and/or @xmath49 where @xmath50 is arbitrary periodic function . the _ indefinite product
_ @xmath51 is any function , satisfying the relation @xmath52 @xmath51 is defined up to the multiplication by arbitrary periodic function of @xmath36 .
note that for any rational function @xmath42 one can express @xmath53 as a product of @xmath54-functions multiplied by arbitrary periodic function , see ref .
we will determine the indefinite product @xmath55 also for the matrix functions @xmath56 as a matrix function , satisfying the relation @xmath57 obviously , this defines @xmath58 up to the multiplication from the right by arbitrary periodic matrix . in these notations
one can write down the general solution of eq . in the form @xmath59
where @xmath60^{-1}$ ] is called a _ summing factor_. if the summand in eq .
decreases faster than @xmath45 when @xmath46 and/or @xmath47 , one can use eqs .
, to write @xmath61 note that the second term in the right - hand side is invariant with respect to the choice of the summing factor .
thus , in order to find the integral , we need to fix the function @xmath62 for any choice of the summing factor . here we note the essential difference between the general solutions of _ differential _ and _ difference _ equations .
the homogeneous part of the general solution of the differential equation is parameterized by finite number of constants , while the homogeneous part of the general solution of the difference equation is parameterized by the periodic function(s ) .
while fixing the finite number of constants is a relatively simple task , fixing the periodic function may be quite difficult .
the key point of the dra approach is the usage of the analytical properties of the integral in order to fix this function .
let us rewrite eq . as @xmath63 suppose that we can show that the right - hand side of this equation is a meromorphic function of @xmath64 in the riemann sphere .
then @xmath62 is determined , up to a constant , by the principal parts of its laurent series around singular points .
the analysis of the analytical properties of the right - hand side of eq . can be performed in any vertical stripe of unit length in the complex plane of @xmath36 , as demonstrated in fig .
1 . there is no cut on the ray @xmath65 because the right - hand side is necessarily a periodic function of @xmath36 .
the proper choice of this stripe ( _ basic stripe _ ) can simplify the evaluation of the integral .
( 340.60 , 149.59)(0,0 ) ( 0,0),title="fig : " ] ( 316.74,128.61 ) ( 121.56,134.57)@xmath36 ( 73.17,77.42 ) ( 98.70,77.36)@xmath66 ( 302.89,87.93)@xmath67 usually , one is interested in the analytical properties of the integral as a function of some external invariant .
here we are interested instead in the analytical properties of the integral as a function of @xmath33 .
it appears that the latter properties are much simpler than the former .
let us consider the parametric representation of some @xmath1-loop integral in euclidean space with @xmath68 internal lines ( see , e.g. , ref .
@xcite):@xmath69 ^{\nu l - i}}{\left [ p\left ( x\right ) \right ] ^{\nu\left ( l+1\right)-i}}.\label{eq : parametric}\ ] ] the polynomials @xmath70 and @xmath71 are determined by the graph . for our consideration
it is important only that both these functions are nonnegative in the whole integration region,@xmath72 suppose that the parametric representation converges for all @xmath36 in some interval @xmath73 .
then it is easy to see that it converges on the whole stripe @xmath74 .
indeed , we can estimate @xmath75 therefore , eq . determines @xmath76 as a holomorphic function on the whole stripe @xmath77 .
in fact , in ref .
@xcite a more general fact was proved : the representation determines the meromorphic function on the whole complex @xmath36-plane .
the determination of poles position can be automatized thanks to ` fiesta ` @xcite . as @xmath78 tends to @xmath79 while @xmath80 is fixed , eq .
shows that @xmath81 thus , the parametric representation can be used for the determination of the analytical properties of the first term in the right - hand side of eq . .
since the second term in the right - hand side of eq
. is constructed of the integrals already known at this stage , we , indeed , can determine the position of the poles of function @xmath82 . in order to demonstrate how the representations obtained within the dra method can be treated numerically ,
let us consider the three - loop master integrals depicted in fig .
[ fig : masters ] . direct application of the dra method gives the following results : @xmath83 the above results for the integrals @xmath84 and @xmath85 contain repeated sums of the form : @xmath86 from the viewpoint of numerical calculation , it is important that the dependence on the summation variables is factorized in the summand .
we note that it is not the case for the mellin - barnes multiple sums .
let us show that the calculation of such factorized sums can be performed without nested loops .
indeed , let us define @xmath87 sequences @xmath88 as follows : @xmath89 it is easy to check that the last sequence , @xmath90 , converges to @xmath91 .
obviously , the iterative calculation of these quantities can be organized in one loop .
therefore , the complexity of the numerical calculation grows moderately with the complexity level of the integrals .
the dependence of the calculation time on the order of the expansion , required precision , and complexity level of the integrals is shown in fig . [
fig : timing ] .
we see that for all three cases the method shows quite moderate growth of the evaluation time .
we have briefly reviewed the method of calculation of multiloop integrals based on the @xmath0-recurrence and @xmath0-analyticity .
the method appears to be powerful enough to deal with the most complicated cases .
this work was supported by rfbr ( grants nos .
10 - 02 - 01238 , 11 - 02 - 01196 , 11 - 02 - 00220 , 11 - 02 - 08379 ) and by federal special - purpose program `` scientific and scientific - pedagogical personnel of innovative russia '' .
i appreciate the organizers support for the participation in the acat conference .
i am grateful to y. schrder for drawing my attention to typos in the previous version of this paper .
99 lee r n 2010 _ nucl .
_ b * 830 * 474 .
[ arxiv:0911.0252 ] .
tarasov o v 1996 _ phys .
_ d * 54 * 6479 , hep - th/9606018 .
lee r n , smirnov a v and smirnov v a 2010 _ jhep _ * 1004 * , 020 .
[ arxiv:1001.2887 [ hep - ph ] ] .
lee r n , smirnov a v and smirnov v a 2010 _ nucl .
suppl . _ * 205 - 206 * , 308 .
[ arxiv:1005.0362 [ hep - ph ] ] .
lee r n and smirnov v a 2011 _ jhep _ * 1102 * , 102 .
[ arxiv:1010.1334 [ hep - ph ] ] .
lee r n and terekhov i s 2011 _ jhep _ * 1101 * , 068 .
[ arxiv:1010.6117 [ hep - ph ] ] .
lee r n , smirnov a v and smirnov v a 2011 _ eur .
j. _ c * 71 * , 1708 .
[ arxiv:1103.3409 [ hep - th ] ] .
lee r n , smirnov a v and smirnov v a 2012 _ nucl .
_ b * 856 * 95 .
[ arxiv:1108.0732 [ hep - th ] ] | calculation multiloop integrals important for perturbative quantum field theory calculational methods developed direct and indirect methods former include feynman parameterization technique mellin - barnes representation method gegenbauer polynomials expansion coordinate space latter methods equations satisfied by integrals construction relies on ibp reduction integrals to finite set master integrals technique derive differential equation for integrals several scales or difference equation for integrals one scale equations determine integrals solution homogeneous parts method multiloop integrals evaluation based on @xmath0 recurrence relations-analyticity suggested dra method applied to complicated integrals review method calculation @xmath1-loop integral depending on @xmath2 linearly independent external momenta @xmath3 @xmath4 scalar products depending on loop momenta loop integral has form@xmath10 scalar functions @xmath11 linear polynomials @xmath12 functions linearly independent form complete basis non - zero linear combination depends on loop momenta @xmath12 expressed in @xmath11 integral @xmath13 value of function of integer @xmath14-dimensional vector @xmath15points in @xmath16 integrals ) same positive coordinates form sector_ space split into @xmath17 sectors labeled by simplest elements @xmath18 denotes sector all points have two first coordinates positive points integrals in @xmath16 sectors form partially ordered set relation point @xmath19 simpler than @xmath20 all coordinates positive in @xmath19 positive in @xmath20 not vice versa introduce operators @xmath21 on functions as @xmath22 respect sectors values of functions @xmath23 and @xmath24 in sector expressed via values function @xmath25 in same sectorsoperators express integral @xmath26 dimensions via @xmath0 dimensions @xmath27\left \mathcal{d}-e - l+1\right ) b_{1},\ldots b_{n}\right ) \mathcal{d}\right ) \mathbf{n}\right){eq : lowering \mathcal{d}-2\right )\mathbf{n}\right ) \mu/2)^{l}q\left ( a_{1},\ldots , a_{n}\right \mathcal{d}\right ){n}\right{eq : raising} @xmath28 euclidean / pseudoeuclidean case polynomials @xmath29 @xmath30 determined as @xmath31 relations useful when integral left - hand side master ibp reduction right - hand side eqs obtains difference equations master integrals linear combination integrals same sectors left - hand side assume integrals simpler sectors known ibp reduction makes eqs equivalent consider lowering dimensional recurrence relation from eq change notations writing @xmath32 where @xmath33 .sector integral left - side contains one master integral form equation @xmath34 @xmath35 rational function of @xmath36 @xmath37 non - homogeneous part simpler master integrals @xmath38 dimensions sector several master integrals consider column - vector integral @xmath39 write equations matrix form : @xmath40 @xmath41 rational matrix coefficients rational functions @xmath36 notion indefinite sum indefinite product function @xmath42 indefinite sum @xmath43 any function defined addition arbitrary periodic function @xmath36 function @xmath42 decreases faster than @xmath45 write @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 arbitrary periodic function indefinite product @xmath51 any function relation defined multiplication by arbitrary periodic function @xmath36 rational function @xmath42 express @xmath53 product of @xmath54-functions multiplied by arbitrary periodic function determine indefinite product @xmath55 matrix functions @xmath56 matrix function relation @xmath57 defines @xmath58 multiplication by arbitrary periodic matrix general solution eq @xmath59 where @xmath60^{-1}$ ] _ summing factor_summand in eq . decreases faster than @xmath45 use eqs write @xmath61 second term right - hand side invariant choice summing factor find integral fix function @xmath62 for choice summing factor difference between general solutions differential difference _ equations homogeneous parameterized by finite constants by periodic function(s fixing finite number constants simple periodic function difficult key point usage analytical properties of integral to fix function rewrite eq . as @xmath63 right - hand side meromorphic function of @xmath64 in riemann sphere @xmath62 determined by principal parts laurent series around singular points analysis of analytical properties right - hand side eq performed in any vertical stripe unit length in complex plane of @xmath36 in fig . 1 no cut on ray @xmath65 right - hand side periodic function of @xmath36 proper choice of stripe evaluation of integral ( 340.60 , 149.59) ( 316.74,128.61 ) ( 121.56,134.57)@xmath36 ( 73.17,77.42 ) 98.70,77.36)@xmath66 ( 302.89,87.@xmath67 interested in analytical properties integral function external invariant here interested in properties integral function of @xmath33 latter properties simpler consider parametric representation of @xmath1-loop integral in euclidean space with @xmath68 internal lines ref @xcite):@xmath69\right\right polynomials @xmath70 and @xmath71 determined by important functions nonnegative in whole integration region,@xmath72 parametric representation converges for @xmath36 interval @xmath73 converges on whole stripe @xmath74 estimate @xmath75 eq determines @xmath76 as holomorphic function on whole stripe @xmath77 ref @xcite representation determines meromorphic function on whole complex @xmath36-plane determination of poles position automatized thanks to @xcite @xmath78 tends to @xmath79 @xmath80 fixed shows @xmath81 parametric representation used for determination analytical properties of first term right - hand side eq . second term right - hand side constructed of integrals known can determine position of poles of function @xmath82 demonstrate representations dra method numerically consider three - loop master integrals in fig . direct application dra method gives results : @xmath83 results integrals @xmath84 @xmath85 contain repeated sums @xmath86 important dependence on summation variables factorized in summand not case for mellin - barnes multiple sums calculation factorized sums without nested loops define @xmath87 sequences @xmath88 : @xmath89 last sequence @xmath90 converges to @xmath91 iterative calculation organized in one loop complexity calculation grows moderately with complexity level integrals dependence calculation time on order expansion required precision complexity level integrals shown in fig . timing all three cases method shows moderate growth evaluation time reviewed method calculation multiloop integrals based @xmath0-recurrence @xmath0-analyticity method powerful complicated cases work supported by rfbr ( grants 01238 01196 08379 ) federal special - purpose program `` scientific pedagogical personnel of innovative russia '' appreciate organizers support participation in acat conference grateful to y. schrder for to typos in previous version paperlee r n 2010 830 arxiv:0911.0252 tarasov 1996 54 6479 hep - th/9606018 lee r n smirnov smirnov 2010 1004 020 arxiv:1001.2887 hep - ph lee smirnov 2010 205 - 206 308 arxiv:1005.0362 hep - ph lee r n smirnov 2011 1102 102 arxiv:1010.1334 hep - ph lee r n terekhov 2011 1101 * 068 arxiv:1010.6117 hep - ph lee r n smirnov smirnov v a 2011 71 * 1708 arxiv:1103.3409 hep - th lee r n smirnov smirnov 2012 b 856 * 95 arxiv:1108.0732 hep - th | 0.4984 | 3,222 | 1,685 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,423 | at cleo , the charmonium singlet states @xmath0 and @xmath1 have been firmly identified and a long standing discrepancy for @xmath2 has been resolved . address = department of physics and astronomy , northwestern university , evanston , il , 60208 , usa | quantum chromodynamics , qcd , took foothold with the discovery of @xmath3 , the spin triplet s wave state @xmath4 of charmonium . despite 25 years of extensive work in charmonium spectroscopy by slac and desy in @xmath5 annihilation and fermilab in @xmath6 annihilation
, several nagging problems remained unsolved . among the most important were problems related to spin
singlet states and two photon widths of @xmath7 states .
neither the @xmath5 or @xmath6 experiments were able to identify the s- and
p - wave singlet states @xmath0 and @xmath1 . these states are obviously extremely important for understanding the spin
spin hyperfine interaction of @xmath8 .
the two photon widths of @xmath7 states @xmath9 are important for understanding relativistic and radiative effects in charmonia , because in the lowest order they are pure qed widths , akin to those of positronium levels .
unfortunately , results from different measuring techniques have remained very divergent for about twenty years . in this talk , i am going to address both of these problems .
after 25 years of failed efforts to identify it , @xmath0 was finally identified by belle , babar , and cleo .
cleo @xcite measured @xmath11 mev , which determines @xmath12 mev .
this is an unexpected and extremely interesting result , considering that @xmath13 mev , and most theoretical predictions had @xmath14 mev .
the unexpectedly small hyperfine splitting observed for 2s states makes it more interesting than ever to look deeper into the hyperfine splitting of other charmonia , in particular the 1p states .
if the confinement potential is lorentz scalar , there is no long range spin
spin interaction in @xmath8 .
it follows that for all other waves ( @xmath15 hyperfine splitting is zero , so that @xmath16 . to test this prediction
it is necessary to identify @xmath1 and measure @xmath17 with precision . in 1992
fermilab e760 studied the reaction @xmath18 and claimed the observation of a signal for @xmath19 .
however , higher luminosity runs by fermilab e835 @xcite in 1996 and 2000 failed to confirm this observation .
fermilab e835 has also searched for @xmath19 in their 1996/2000 data in the reaction @xmath20 they report @xmath21 , with 13 observed events and a significance of the @xmath19 signal at @xmath22 level . at cleo
@xcite we have now firmly identified @xmath19 with a significance of @xmath23 . at cleo data
were taken at @xmath24 , with 3.08 million @xmath24 .
these data have been analyzed for @xcite @xmath25 both inclusive and exclusive analyses were done , and an accurate determination of @xmath19 mass was made in recoils against @xmath26 s whose energy could be measured with precision .
* inclusive analyses : * two independent analyses were made , one in which the photon energy @xmath27 was constrained , and the other in which @xmath28 was constrained .
completely consistent results were obtained . * exclusive analysis : * in this analysis , instead of constraining @xmath27 or @xmath28 , seven known decay channels of @xmath29 were measured . once again , consistent results were obtained .
the overall result is @xmath30 or @xmath31 two conclusions follow from these results : ( a ) the simple pqcd expectation is not strongly violated , ( b ) the magnitude and sign of @xmath32 is not yet well determined .
, in ( left ) inclusive analysis ( right ) exclusive analysis @xcite.,width=211 ]
there are two different ways of measuring the two photon width of @xmath34 . in @xmath5 collisions ,
the @xmath34 state is formed in two photon fusion , @xmath35 , and a subsequent decay of @xmath34 ( usually @xmath36 ) is measured .
these measurements , including the latest one from belle @xcite , yield @xmath37 ev . in @xmath6 annihilation ,
the @xmath34 state is directly formed and its decay into two photons is measured . in these fermilab measurements
@xcite , @xmath38 ev is determined .
it is this persistent and long - standing large discrepancy which motivated us to make the present measurement at cleo @xcite using 14.4 fb@xmath39 of @xmath5 data taken in the upsilon region to study the two photon fusion reaction @xmath40 the spectrum of photon mass , @xmath41 , in fig .
3 shows clear peaks corresponding to the e1 photon from @xmath36 .
fits to these peaks leads to @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 ev for @xmath5 , @xmath45 , and ( @xmath46 ) , respectively , using @xmath47 as measured recently by cleo @xcite . in making a comparison of the present results with other recent results ,
it was noted that the differences originated from using an old ( pdg1990 ) value for @xmath48 which was nearly 40% smaller than the result of the new cleo measurement @xcite . when the results of the belle and e835 measurements are reevaluated using the cleo value of @xmath48 , it is found that all results become completely consistent . since the two gluon decay width of @xmath34 , @xmath49 mev , our measurement of @xmath2 allows us to estimate the strong coupling constant @xmath50 . according to pqcd , @xmath51 .
this leads to @xmath52 . if first order radiative corrections
are included , we obtain @xmath53 . | quantum chromodynamics discovery @xmath3 spin triplet s wave state of charmonium despite 25 years work charmonium spectroscopy slac desy fermilab problems unsolved spin singlet states two photon widths of @xmath7 states @xmath5 or @xmath6 experiments identify s- p - wave singlet states @xmath0 and @xmath1 states important for spin hyperfine interaction @xmath8 two photon widths of @xmath9 important for relativistic radiative effects in charmonia pure qed widths positronium results from measuring techniques divergent for twenty years problems after 25 years failed efforts @xmath0 identified by belle babar cleo cleo measured @xmath11 mev determines @xmath12 mev unexpected interesting result small hyperfine splitting for 2s states interesting to look hyperfine splitting other charmonia 1p states if confinement potential lorentz scalar no long range spin interaction in @xmath8 other waves @xmath15 hyperfine splitting zero to test prediction necessary to identify @xmath1 measure @xmath17 with precision1992 fermilab e760 studied reaction @xmath18 claimed signal @xmath19 higher luminosity runs fermilab e835 1996 2000 confirm fermilab e835 searched for @xmath19 1996/2000 data reaction @xmath20 @xmath21 13 observed events significance @xmath19 signal at @xmath22 level cleo @xcite identified @xmath19 significance @xmath23 cleo data taken @xmath24 3.08 million @xmath24 data analyzed for @xcite @xmath25 inclusive exclusive analyses accurate determination @xmath19 mass recoils against @xmath26 s energy measured inclusive analyses two independent analyses photon energy @xmath27 constrained @xmath28 constrained consistent results exclusive analysis seven decay channels @xmath29 measured consistent results overall result @xmath30 or @xmath31 two conclusions simple pqcd expectation not violated magnitude sign @xmath32 not determined inclusive exclusive analysis two ways measuring photon width @xmath34 @xmath5 collisions @xmath34 state formed two photon fusion subsequent decay of @xmath34 usually @xmath36 measuredmeasurements latest belle @xcite yield @xmath37 ev @xmath6 annihilation @xmath34 state formed decay into two photons measured fermilab measurements @xmath38 ev determined persistent discrepancy motivated present measurement cleo @xcite using 14.4 fb@xmath39 @xmath5 data upsilon region two photon fusion reaction @xmath40 spectrum photon mass @xmath41 fig 3 shows peaks e1 photon from @xmath36 leads to @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 ev @xmath5 @xmath45 @xmath46 using @xmath47 measured cleo @xcite differences old pdg1990 value @xmath48 40% smaller new cleo measurement belle e835 measurements reevaluated cleo value @xmath48 results consistent two gluon decay width @xmath34 @xmath49 mev measurement @xmath2 estimate coupling constant @xmath50 @xmath51 leads to @xmath52 first radiative corrections obtain @xmath53 | 0.18474 | 1,288 | 684 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,428 | zheng [ phys . rev .
e * 61 * , 153 ( 2000 ) ] claims that phase ordering dynamics in the microcanonical @xmath0 model displays unusual scaling laws .
we show here , performing more careful numerical investigations , that zheng only observed transient dynamics mostly due to the corrections to scaling introduced by lattice effects , and that ising - like ( model a ) phase ordering actually takes place at late times .
moreover , we argue that energy conservation manifests itself in different corrections to scaling . 2 the problem of the dynamical foundations of statistical mechanics has received renewed attention recently , when , in the spirit of the famous work of fermi , pasta , and ulam @xcite , researchers directly studied the evolution of isolated , many - degrees - of - freedom hamiltonian systems with the aim of relating their microscopic , deterministic , chaotic motion to their macroscopic statistical properties @xcite . in this context , the two - dimensional lattice @xmath0 model is of special interest because it is known to exhibit , within the canonical ensemble , a second - order phase transition in the ising universality class .
recent work @xcite aimed , in particular , at studying the corresponding behavior in the isolated , microcanonical case , whose equations of motion can be written : @xmath1 where the sum is over the four nearest neighbors of site @xmath2 on a square lattice . in the same spirit ,
zheng @xcite has considered the a priori simpler problem of the phase - ordering process which takes place when the microcanonical @xmath0 lattice is suddenly `` quenched '' below the critical point .
universality of domain growth laws is nowadays a fairly well - established topic @xcite .
it is well documented , even for less traditional systems such as deterministic , possibly chaotic , spatially - extended dynamical systems @xcite . for a scalar order parameter
, two main universality classes can be distinguished depending on whether it is locally conserved or not .
the ising model is prototypical of the non - conserved case , and so should be the lattice @xmath0 model , at least in the usual canonical ensemble point of view .
however , and this was the interesting point raised by zheng , the presence of the energy conservation in the microcanonical case might have an influence on the dynamical scaling laws associated with phase ordering . in this sense
, the question is whether the phase ordering of model c @xcite is in the same universality class as model a. using numerical simulations in the so - called `` early - time '' regime , zheng confirmed that the usual dynamical scaling laws seem to hold , but with exponents at odds with those both the non - conserved order parameter ( ncop ) and the conserved order parameter ( cop ) class @xcite .
in particular , he found @xmath3 ( @xmath4 is the exponent governing the algebraic growth of @xmath5 , the typical size of domains ) , between its ncop and cop values ( @xmath6 and @xmath7 ) .
zheng `` explains '' this surprising result by the influence on scaling of `` the fixed point corresponding to the minimum energy of random initial states '' ( present when considering domain growth ) .
here we show that a more careful numerical investigation actually leads to conclude that the microcanonical lattice @xmath0 model shows normal , ncop phase - ordering .
we argue that energy - conservation , but also lattice effects , have sub - leading influences on scaling .
we discuss in particular the effect of the increase of the `` bulk temperature '' due to the progressive disappearance of interfaces during the growth transient .
we attribute the erroneous results of zheng to the danger of using `` early - time '' methods and naive logarithmic plots in problems with large microscopic times and/or corrections to scaling . | zheng conducted different numerical experiments which led to estimates of exponents @xmath8 , @xmath9 ( where @xmath10 is the so - called fisher - huse exponent ) , and @xmath11 . from all direct measurements of @xmath8
he concluded that @xmath3 . using this value
, he found an estimate of @xmath10 in agreement with the ncop value ( @xmath12 whereas @xmath13 ) .
thus , the only strong departure from the ncop values is for exponent @xmath8 .
therefore , in the following , we focus on growth law of @xmath5 in large systems at late times ( as opposed to the early - time approach favored by zheng ) . in order to reach late times satisfactorily , we need a better control of the conservation of energy than with the simple second - order scheme used by zheng . the following results were obtained with a third - order bilateral symplectic algorithm @xcite with a timestep @xmath14 .
the conservation of initial energy is better than @xmath15 in relative value in all runs presented . to investigate phase - ordering
, we use the same initial conditions as zheng ( @xmath16 where the sign is random and @xmath17 calculated to yield the desired energy density @xmath18 ) .
we present results for two sets of parameter values , @xmath19 ( set a , used by zheng ) , and @xmath20 ( set b , used in @xcite ) .
the initial energy density ( @xmath21 for set a , and @xmath22 for set b ) , was chosen very close to its minimum value allowed by the random - sign initial conditions ( @xmath23 for set a , and @xmath24 for set b ) .
this ensures that `` thermal '' fluctuations are minimized , since the energy density is then as far as possible from the critical energy density @xmath25 ( @xmath26 for set a , and @xmath27 for set b ) .
the typical domain size @xmath5 was determined by the mid - height value of @xmath28 , the normalized two - point correlation function calculated for simplicity along the principal axes of the lattice using the continuous field @xmath29 or the reduced `` spin '' variable @xmath30 : @xmath31 .
( no significant difference was found between the two cases , and only results using @xmath32 are shown below . )
we first checked that dynamical scaling holds by observing the collapse of @xmath33 curves at different times after some transient ( not shown ) @xcite .
for both sets of parameters , the expected ncop law ( @xmath34 , i.e. @xmath35 ) is reached at late times , but a rather long transient is observed , especially for set a ( fig .
[ f1]ab ) .
the same data plotted in logarithmic scales is thus misleading . if the data for set b reach the `` normal '' scaling ( see fig .
[ f1]d and its inset ) at late times , the corresponding plot for parameter set a ( fig .
[ f1]c ) seems to indicate a value of @xmath4 between @xmath36 and @xmath37 ( typical of the value estimated by zheng ) if one ignores the systematic trend upward of the local exponent ( see inset of fig . [
f1]c ) @xcite . following zheng , we also measured the decay of the autocorrelation function @xmath38 , but , again , for rather large systems and late times , choosing , in particular , initial reference times @xmath39 larger than the `` microscopic '' transient time . in the usual ncop phase ordering framework , we expect @xmath40^{\lambda } \sim \left(\frac{t_0}{t}\right)^{\lambda / z}\ ] ] where the fisher - huse exponent @xmath41 . again , plotting @xmath42 vs @xmath43 for parameter set a may yields an `` effective '' exponent @xmath9 smaller than its ncop value ( and close to the value given by zheng ) , but a closer look reveals a systematic increase of the instantaneous exponent ( fig .
[ f2]a and inset ) .
however , plotting @xmath44 vs @xmath5 , the expected scaling is observed ( fig .
considering now parameter set b , the expected scaling laws are observed rather easily ( fig .
[ f2]b , d ) .
this confirms further that for the parameter values chosen by zheng , the onset of the asymptotic scaling regime is delayed . for the sake of completeness , and in order to probe the validity of the early - time scaling approach taken by zheng
, we also performed numerical simulations to measure the short - time growth of the squared magnetization @xmath45 ( @xmath46 being defined as the spatial average of either @xmath47 or @xmath48 ) for samples with zero initial magnetization . in this case , for ncop scaling , we expect @xmath49 .
our data on logarithmic scales barely reaches the expected behavior at @xmath50 ( fig .
[ f3]a , b ) .
note that the corrections have different sign for the two parameter sets . on linear scales , however , our data reveals the expected proportionality of @xmath51 and @xmath52 ( fig .
[ f3]c , d ) .
the above results show that domain growth in the microcanonical @xmath0 model eventually falls into the ncop universality class ( @xmath35 , @xmath41 ) after some possibly long transient behavior . in this section
, we suggest that there are two main factors at the origin of these corrections to scaling : space discretization and energy conservation . for the sets of parameters studied by zheng ( notably parameter set a )
, domain growth initially appears to be slower than the expected ncop law ( the effective value of @xmath8 measured at short times is larger than two ) .
this is similar to earlier observations on coupled map lattices , both for the ncop and cop cases .
first measurements of domain growth seemed to indicate slower growth in those discrete - space , discrete - time chaotic models @xcite , but it was shown later that this non - trivial scaling is only transient and that , for late - enough times , normal scaling is recovered @xcite .
it was also argued that these long transients gradually disappear in the continuous - space limit which is well - defined in these systems @xcite . here ,
it is easy to observe that , increasing @xmath53 ( and @xmath54 , since there is only one free parameter ) , the slowing - down of domain growth due to lattice effects diminishes , as suggested by the difference between parameter sets a and b. for parameter set b , the transient actually presents faster growth than asymptotically : corrections to scaling are dominated by another phenomenon , stronger than lattice effects . the ( conserved ) total energy in the system can be partitioned into three components , kinetic , potential , and interaction energy : @xmath55 as domain growth proceeds following random initial conditions , the interaction energy decreases with time as a large part of it is contained in the interfaces separating domains , the density of which decreases like @xmath56 .
potential decreases and kinetic energy increases ( fig .
[ f4 ] ) .
starting from `` ordered '' initial conditions ( all sites in the same phase , e.g. @xmath57 ) , the three components of the total energy are almost constant , except for a slight ( quasi logarithmic in time ) increase of interaction energy and decrease of potential energy due to the nucleation of `` thermal '' droplets and to relaxation further into potential wells .
this effect is indeed larger for parameter set a for which the minimal possible energy density @xmath58 is further away from the critical energy density , leading to stronger thermal fluctuations than for parameter set b. kinetic energy can be interpreted as a temperature in the microcanonical context @xcite .
we can thus see the observed increase of kinetic energy as an increase of the temperature of the system .
for the ( canonical ) ising model , it is well known @xcite that the prefactor of the growth law of @xmath59 decreases to zero as the temperature approaches its critical value .
we suggest to see the growth law observed here for the @xmath0 model as including a `` temperature - dependent '' prefactor : @xmath60 quantitatively ( fig .
[ f4 ] ) , the kinetic energy seems to reach its asymptotic value like : @xmath61 assuming its analyticity , we can write the prefactor @xmath62 : @xmath63 where @xmath64 is the asymptotic ( @xmath65 ) prefactor of the domain growth law . injecting ( [ deltae ] ) and ( [ expand ] ) into ( [ growth ] ) , we finally expect the following ansatz to hold for the domain growth law : @xmath66 equation ( [ ansatz ] ) provides excellent fits to our data for the growth of @xmath59 .
we find @xmath67 , @xmath68 , and @xmath69 for parameter set a ( with @xmath70 and correlation coefficient 0.99996 ) , and @xmath71 , @xmath72 , and @xmath73 ( with @xmath74 and correlation coefficient 0.9997 ) for parameter set b. the corrective terms have opposite signs in both cases : this indicates that eq .
( [ ansatz ] ) is only relevant for parameter set b , because , in analogy with the ising model , only negative values of @xmath75 are allowed ( the prefactor of the growth law decreases with increasing temperature ) .
a first conclusion is thus that the main corrections to scaling for parameter set a ( typical of those used by zheng ) are due to lattice effects and are _ not _ consequences of the conservation of global energy .
we note that , similarly , a fit of domain growth in coupled map lattices also yields positive values of @xmath75 , indicating that this sign is a signature of lattice effects @xcite .
on the other hand , the above framework does provide the relevant explanation for the corrections to scaling observed for parameter set b , which can thus be traced back to the fluxes between the various components of the energy induced by the decrease of interfaces between domains as phase - ordering proceeds .
in this comment , we have shown that zheng reached erroneous conclusions when studying phase ordering in the microcanonical lattice @xmath0 model .
this system , like other chaotic , deterministic , dynamical systems presenting phase ordering , does display the expected domain growth scaling laws , i.e. those of the non - conserved order parameter case ( model a , @xmath35 , @xmath41 ) .
we have shown further that the main influence of the conservation of energy is to introduce corrections to scaling , but that the long transients which plagued zheng s approach are due to lattice effects .
zheng offered , as an explanation for his non - conventional results , that the system considered falls into the class of model c , where a conserved density is coupled to the order parameter @xcite .
studies of phase - ordering in model c @xcite show that model b - like , but also model a - like behavior can be observed . in this context , the microcanonical @xmath0 lattice can be considered as a model c system quenched into its `` bistable region '' ( where @xmath35 is observed @xcite ) .
since @xmath5 is precisely defined as the midheight value of @xmath76 , it is in our opinion not so surprising that we obtain already a good collapse before the scaling regime sets in . in this sense
our appoach is different from that of zheng who tried to collapse @xmath77 . of course
, plotting the quantity of interest against @xmath78 and looking for a straight line is not the most accurate way of determining @xmath8 ( here we use this only because the log - log plots do not exhibit a constant asymptotic slope ) .
nevertheless , the value @xmath79 measured by zheng can safely be rejected since the local slope of @xmath5 against @xmath80 increases with time ( not shown here ) . | zheng conducted numerical experiments led to estimates of exponents @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 fisher - huse exponent @xmath11 measurements of @xmath8 concluded @xmath3 found estimate of @xmath10 with ncop value @xmath12 @xmath13 only strong departure from ncop values for exponent @xmath8 focus on growth law of @xmath5 in large systems at late times early - time approach zheng need better control of conservation of energy than second - order scheme zheng results obtained with third - order bilateral symplectic algorithm @xcite with timestep @xmath14 conservation of initial energy better than @xmath15 investigate phase - ordering use same initial conditions as zheng ( @xmath16 random @xmath17 calculated desired energy density @xmath18 present results for two sets of parameter values @xmath19 @xmath20 initial energy density @xmath21 @xmath22 chosen close to minimum value allowed by random - sign initial conditions ensures thermal fluctuations minimized energy density from critical energy density @xmath25typical domain size @xmath5 determined by mid - height value @xmath28 normalized two - point correlation function calculated along axes lattice using continuous field @xmath29 or reduced spin variable @xmath30 : @xmath31 no significant difference results using @xmath32 shown checked dynamical scaling observing collapse of @xmath33 curves after transient both sets expected ncop law ( @xmath34 @xmath35 reached at late times long transient observed especially set a data plotted in logarithmic scales misleading if data for set b reach normal scaling at late times plot for parameter set a value @xmath4 between @xmath36 and @xmath37 typical value estimated by zheng systematic trend upward of local exponent measured decay of autocorrelation function @xmath38 for large systems late times choosing initial reference times @xmath39 larger than microscopic transient time usual ncop phase ordering framework expect @xmath40 where fisher - huse exponent @xmath41plotting @xmath42 vs @xmath43 yields exponent @xmath9 smaller than ncop value close to zheng closer look reveals increase of instantaneous exponent fig plotting @xmath44 vs @xmath5 expected scaling observed scaling laws confirms parameter values chosen by zheng onset asymptotic scaling delayed early - time scaling approach performed numerical simulations short - time growth squared magnetization @xmath45 ( @xmath46 spatial average of @xmath47 or @xmath48 ) for samples with zero initial magnetization for ncop scaling expect @xmath49 data on logarithmic scales barely reaches expected behavior at @xmath50 f3]a corrections different sign for two parameter sets linear scales data reveals expected proportionality of @xmath51 and @xmath52 results show domain growth in microcanonical @xmath0 model falls into ncop universality class ( @xmath35 @xmath41 after long transient behavior two main factors corrections to scaling space discretization and energy conservationparameters studied by zheng parameter set a domain growth slower than expected ncop law effective value of @xmath8 measured at short times larger than two similar to earlier observations on coupled map lattices ncop cop cases first measurements domain growth slower growth in discrete - space - time chaotic models @xcite shown later scaling is transient times normal scaling recovered long transients disappear in continuous - space limit defined in systems increasing @xmath53 and @xmath54 slowing domain growth due to lattice effects diminishes by difference between parameter sets a and b parameter set b transient presents faster growth corrections to scaling dominated by another phenomenon stronger than lattice effects conserved total energy system partitioned into three components kinetic potential interaction energy : @xmath55 domain growth interaction energy decreases with time in interfaces separating domains potential decreases kinetic energy increases from initial conditions three components of total energy almost constant except for slight increase of interaction energy decrease of potential energy due to nucleation of thermal droplets relaxation into potential wellseffect larger for parameter set a minimal energy density @xmath58 further from critical density leading stronger thermal fluctuations than parameter set b kinetic energy interpreted as temperature in microcanonical context increase kinetic energy as increase temperature system ising model prefactor growth law of @xmath59 decreases to zero as temperature approaches critical value growth law for @xmath0 model temperature - dependent prefactor : @xmath60 kinetic energy asymptotic value like @xmath61 prefactor @xmath62 : @xmath63 @xmath64 asymptotic @xmath65 ) prefactor of domain growth law injecting deltae expand ] into growth ansatz for domain growth law : @xmath66 equation fits to data for growth of @xmath59 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 for parameter set a correlation coefficient 0.99996 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 correlation coefficient 0.9997 ) for parameter set b corrective terms opposite signs eq. only relevant for parameter set b negative values of @xmath75 allowed prefactor growth law decreases with temperatureconclusion main corrections to scaling for parameter set a by zheng due to lattice effects not consequences conservation global energy domain growth in coupled map lattices yields positive values of @xmath75 signature of lattice effects @xcite framework relevant explanation for corrections to scaling for parameter set b traced back to fluxes between components energy induced by decrease of interfaces between domains as phase - ordering zheng erroneous conclusions studying phase ordering in microcanonical lattice @xmath0 model system like expected domain growth scaling laws non - conserved order parameter case main influence conservation of energy corrections to scaling long transients zheng s approach due to lattice effects zheng non - conventional results system falls into class model c conserved density coupled to order parameter @xcite studies of phase - ordering in model c show model b - like model a - like behavior microcanonical @xmath0 lattice considered as model c system into bistable region @xmath35 observed @xcite @xmath5 as midheight value of @xmath76 good collapse before scaling regime sets inour appoach different from zheng collapse @xmath77 plotting quantity against @xmath78 straight line not accurate determining @xmath8 log - log plots constant asymptotic slope value @xmath79 measured by zheng can rejected local slope of @xmath5 against @xmath80 increases with time | 0.43279 | 2,614 | 1,312 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,441 | in this paper we consider a smooth bounded domain @xmath0 and a parametric family of radially symmetric kernels @xmath1 such that , for each @xmath2 , its @xmath3norm is finite but it blows up as @xmath4 . our aim is to establish an @xmath5 independent modulus of continuity in @xmath6 , for the solution @xmath7 of the homogeneous dirichlet problem @xmath8 & = & f & \mbox{in } \ \omega . \\ u & = & 0 & \mbox{in }
\ \omega^c , \end{array } \right .\ ] ] where @xmath9 and the operator @xmath10 has the form @xmath11(x ) = \frac12\int \limits_{{\mathbb{r}}^n } [ u(x + z ) + u(x - z ) - 2u(x)]k_\epsilon(z)dz\ ] ] and it approaches the fractional laplacian as @xmath12 .
the modulus of continuity is obtained combining the comparison principle with the translation invariance of @xmath10 , constructing suitable barriers that allow to manage the discontinuities that the solution @xmath7 may have on @xmath13 .
extensions of this result to fully non - linear elliptic and parabolic operators are also discussed . | let @xmath0 be a bounded open domain with @xmath14 boundary , @xmath9 and @xmath2 .
in this paper we are concerned on study of the dirichlet problem @xmath15 & = & f \quad \mbox{in } \
\omega , \\
\label{exteriordata } u & = & 0 \quad \mbox{in } \
\omega^c,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath10 is a nonlocal operator approaching the fractional laplacian as @xmath5 approaches @xmath16 .
we focus our attention on @xmath10 with the form @xmath17(x ) : = \int_{{\mathbb{r}}^n } [ u(x + z ) - u(x ) ] k_\epsilon(z)dz , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where , for @xmath18 fixed , @xmath19 is defined as @xmath20 notice that for each @xmath2 , @xmath19 is integrable in @xmath21 with @xmath22 norm equal to @xmath23 , where @xmath24 is a constant depending only on @xmath25 and @xmath26 .
we point out that operators with kernel in @xmath22 , like @xmath10 , are known in the literature as _ zero order nonlocal operators_. operator @xmath10 is a particular case of a broad class of nonlocal elliptic operators .
in fact , given a positive measure @xmath27 satisfying the _ lvy condition _ @xmath28 and , for each @xmath29 and @xmath30 bounded and sufficiently smooth at @xmath31 , the operator @xmath32(x)$ ] defined as @xmath33(x ) = \int_{{\mathbb{r}}^n } [ u(x + z ) - u(x ) - \mathbf{1}_{b_1(0)}(z ) \langle du(x ) , z \rangle]\mu(dz),\ ] ] has been a subject of study in a huge variety of contexts such as potential theory ( @xcite ) , probability ( @xcite ) and analysis ( @xcite ) .
an interesting point of view of our problem comes from probability , since represents the infinitesimal generator of a _ jump lvy process _ , see sato @xcite . in our setting ,
the finiteness of the measure is associated with the so - called _ compound poisson process_. dirichlet problems with the form of - arise in the context of exit time problems with trajectories driven by the jump lvy process defined by @xmath34 , and the solution @xmath7 represents the expected value of the associated cost functional , see @xcite .
we may start our discussion with a natural notion of solution to our problem - : we say that a bounded function @xmath30 , continuous in @xmath35 , is a solution of - if it satisfies pointwise in @xmath35 and @xmath36 on @xmath37 .
as we see in section 2 , this problem has a unique solution , more interestingly , through an example we will see that such a solution may not be continuous in @xmath21 , since a discontinuity may appear on the boundary of @xmath35 . see remark [ rmku>0borde ] .
this situation is in great contrast with the limit case @xmath38 , where the kernel becomes @xmath39 and the associated nonlocal operator is the _ fractional laplacian of order @xmath40 _ , denoted by @xmath41 , see @xcite . in this case , the corresponding dirichlet problem becomes @xmath42 where @xmath43 is a normalizing constant .
in the context of the viscosity theory for nonlocal equations ( see @xcite ) , barles , chasseigne and imbert @xcite addressed a large variety of nonlocal elliptic problems including . in that paper , the authors proved the existence and uniqueness of a viscosity solution @xmath44 of satisfying @xmath45 on @xmath13 that is , consequently , continuous when we regard it as a function on @xmath21 .
this result is accomplished by the use of a nonlocal version of the notion of viscosity solution with _ generalized boundary conditions _ , see @xcite for an introduction of this notion in the context of second - order equations .
additionally , fractional problems like enjoy a _ regularizing effect _ as in the classical second - order case .
roughly speaking , for a right - hand side which is merely bounded , the solution @xmath46 of is locally hlder continuous in @xmath35 , see @xcite .
in fact , we should mention here that interior hlder regularity for more general fractional problems ( for which is a particular case ) has been addressed by many authors , see for instance @xcite and the classical book of landkof @xcite , for a non - exhaustive list of references .
the interior hlder regularity is accomplished by well established elliptic techniques as the harnack s inequality ( @xcite ) and the ishii - lions method ( @xcite ) . in both cases
, the nonintegrability of the kernel plays a key role .
hlder regularity for problems like can be extended up to the boundary , as it is proved by ros - oton and serra in @xcite , where a boundary harnack s inequality is the key ingredient ( see also @xcite ) . naturally , as a byproduct of these regularity results ,
compactness properties are available for certain families of solutions of fractional equations .
for instance , the family @xmath47 of functions solving @xmath48 satisfies compactness properties when @xmath49 is uniformly bounded in @xmath50 . for zero order problems , regularizing effects as arising in fractional problems
are no longer available ( see @xcite ) .
in fact , the finiteness of the kernel of zero order operators turns into degenerate ellipticity for which ishii - lions method can not be applied .
thus , `` regularity results '' for zero order problems like - are circumscribed to the heritage of the modulus of continuity of the right - hand side @xmath51 to the solution @xmath7 as it can be seen in @xcite .
however , the modulus of continuity found in @xcite depends strongly on the size of the @xmath22 norm of @xmath19 , which explodes as @xmath4 .
a similar lack of stability as @xmath4 can be observed in the harnack - type inequality results for nonlocal problems found by coville in @xcite . hence , none of the mentioned tools are adequate for getting compactness for the family of solutions @xmath52 of problem - , which is a paradoxical situation since , in the limit case , the solutions actually get higher regularity and stronger compactness control on its behavior . in view of the discussion given above
, a natural mathematical question is if there exists a uniform modulus of continuity in @xmath35 , for the family of solutions @xmath53 to - , and consequently compactness properties for it . in this direction , the main result of this paper is the following [ teo1 ] let @xmath0 a bounded domain with @xmath14 boundary and @xmath9 . for @xmath2 ,
let @xmath7 be a solution to problem - .
then , there is a modulus of continuity @xmath54 depending only on @xmath51 , such that latexmath:[\ ] ] it is known that the unique viscosity solution @xmath7 of agrees the prescribed value of the equation on the boundary , and then @xmath471 on @xmath13 for all @xmath2 , see for example @xcite .
we have @xmath58 is uniformly bounded in @xmath50 and therefore , the application of half - relaxed limits together with viscosity stability results in @xcite , imply @xmath57 locally uniform in @xmath35 as @xmath4 , where @xmath56 is the unique solution to . since @xmath56 is strictly positive in @xmath13 , the convergence of @xmath7 to @xmath56 can not be uniform in @xmath87 , and therefore the family @xmath58 is not equicontinuous in this case .
this example resembles the behavior of the viscosity solutions @xmath7 of the equation @xmath472 which approximate the solution of the equation @xmath473 in this case , the family @xmath474 is not equicontinuous too , see @xcite .
* acknowledgements : * the authors want to thank the referees for carefully reading the paper and making suggestions that resulted in a great improvement in the clarity and simplicity of the proofs .
was partially supported by fondecyt grant # 1110291 , basal - cmm projects and capde , anillo act-125 .
was partially supported by conicyt , grants capital humano avanzado and ayuda realizacin tesis doctoral . barles , g. and burdeau , j. _ the dirichlet problem for semilinear second - order degenerate elliptic equations and applications to stochastic exit time control problems _ comm . in pde .
, 20 ( 1 - 2 ) , 129 - 178 ( 1995 ) . | @xmath0 bounded open domain @xmath14 boundary @xmath9 @xmath2 paper concerned study dirichlet problem @xmath15\quad \mbox{in\omega{exteriordata{aligned} @xmath10 nonlocal operator laplacian @xmath5 approaches @xmath16 focus attention @xmath10 form @xmath17(x )\int_{{\mathbb{r}}^n } u(x + z ) - u(x )\epsilon(z)dz\end{aligned} @xmath18 fixed @xmath19 defined @xmath20 @xmath2 @xmath19 integrable @xmath21 @xmath22 norm equal @xmath23 @xmath24 constant @xmath25 @xmath26 operators kernel @xmath22 @xmath10 zero order nonlocal operators @xmath10 case broad class nonlocal elliptic operatorspositive measure @xmath27 satisfying lvy condition @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 bounded smooth at @xmath31 operator @xmath32(x)$ defined as @xmath33(x ) = \int_{{\mathbb{r}}^n } [ u(x + z ) - u(x ) - \mathbf{1}_{b_1(0)}(z ) du(x subject of study contexts potential theory probability analysis point of view problem from probability infinitesimal generator of jump lvy process finiteness of measure associated with compound poisson process problems arise exit time problems trajectories driven by jump lvy process defined @xmath34 solution @xmath7 represents expected value of associated cost functional solution bounded function @xmath30 continuous in @xmath35 solution if satisfies pointwise in @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 section 2 problem has unique solution solution may not be continuous in @xmath21 discontinuity appear on boundary of @xmath35 remarksituation with limit case @xmath38 kernel becomes @xmath39 nonlocal operator is fractional laplacian of order @xmath40 denoted by @xmath41 dirichlet problem becomes @xmath42 @xmath43 is normalizing constant viscosity theory for nonlocal equations barles chasseigne imbert addressed nonlocal elliptic problems including authors proved viscosity solution @xmath44 satisfying @xmath45 on @xmath13 continuous function on @xmath21 result accomplished by use nonlocal version of notion viscosity solution with generalized boundary conditions _ see @xcite for introduction second - order equations fractional problems enjoy regularizing effect _ classical second - order case for right - hand side bounded solution @xmath46 locally continuous in @xmath35 interior hlder regularity for general fractional problems addressed by many authors see @xcite classical book of landkof @xcite interior hlder regularity accomplished by elliptic techniques harnack s inequality ishii - lions method nonintegrability of kernel key roleregularity for problems extended to boundary proved by ros - oton serra in @xcite boundary harnack s inequality key compactness properties available for certain families solutions fractional equations family @xmath47 functions @xmath48 satisfies compactness when @xmath49 bounded in @xmath50 for zero order problems regularizing effects no available finiteness kernel zero order operators turns into degenerate ellipticity - lions method regularity results for zero order problems circumscribed to modulus of continuity side @xmath51 to solution @xmath7 @xcite modulus of continuity @xcite depends on size of @xmath22 norm of @xmath19 explodes as @xmath4 lack of stability as @xmath4 in harnack - type inequality results for nonlocal problems by coville in @xcite tools adequate for compactness for family solutions @xmath52 problem - solutions get higher regularity stronger compactness control question uniform modulus of continuity in @xmath35 for family solutions @xmath53 to - compactness propertiesmain result paper let @xmath0 bounded domain @xmath14 boundary @xmath9 @xmath7 solution problem modulus continuity @xmath54 @xmath51 unique viscosity solution @xmath7 agrees value equation boundary @xmath471 @xmath13 @xmath2 see @xcite @xmath58 uniformly bounded in @xmath50 half - relaxed limits viscosity stability results @xcite @xmath57 uniform in @xmath35 @xmath4 @xmath56 unique solution @xmath56 positive in @xmath13 convergence @xmath7 to @xmath56 uniform in @xmath87 family @xmath58 not equicontinuous resembles viscosity solutions @xmath7 equation @xmath472 approximate solution equation @xmath473 family @xmath474 not equicontinuous authors thank referees for paper suggestions improvement clarity simplicity proofs partially supported by fondecyt grant # 1110291 basal - cmm projects capde anillo act-125 supported conicyt grants capital humano avanzado ayuda realizacin tesis doctoral barles. burdeau j.dirichlet problem semilinear elliptic equations stochastic exit time control problems comm pde 20 1 129 - 178 1995 | 0.348229 | 2,020 | 1,084 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,447 | we calculate running coupling corrections for the lowest - order gluon production cross section in high energy hadronic and nuclear scattering using the blm scale - setting prescription . at
leading order there are three powers of fixed coupling ; in our final answer , these three couplings are replaced by seven factors of running coupling : five in the numerator and two in the denominator , forming a ` septumvirate ' of running couplings , analogous to the ` triumvirate ' of running couplings found earlier for the small-@xmath0 bfkl / bk / jimwlk evolution equations .
it is interesting to note that the two running couplings in the denominator of the ` septumvirate ' run with complex - valued momentum scales , which are complex conjugates of each other , such that the production cross section is indeed real .
we use our lowest - order result to conjecture how running coupling corrections may enter the full fixed - coupling @xmath1-factorization formula for gluon production which includes non - linear small-@xmath0 evolution . | this proceedings contribution is based on @xcite .
while an exact analytic formula for gluon production in @xmath2 collisions in the color glass condensate ( cgc ) framework is still not known , we do know that in @xmath3 and @xmath4 collisions gluon production at the level of classical gluon fields and leading-@xmath5 nonlinear quantum evolution is given by the @xmath1-factorization formula @xcite : @xmath6 here @xmath7 is the total rapidity interval of the collision , @xmath8 , boldface variables denote two - component transverse plane vectors @xmath9 , and @xmath10 , @xmath11 are the unintegrated gluon distributions in the proton and the nucleus , respectively , which are defined by @xcite @xmath12 and @xmath13 in the quantity @xmath14 denotes the forward scattering amplitude for a gluon dipole of transverse size @xmath15 with its center located at the impact parameter @xmath16 scattering on a target nucleus with total rapidity interval @xmath17 .
@xmath14 can , in general , be found from the jimwlk evolution equation . in the large-@xmath18 limit it is related to the quark dipole forward scattering amplitude on the same nucleus @xmath19 by @xmath20 where @xmath21 can be found from the bk evolution equation .
the quantity @xmath22 from is also a gluon dipole amplitude , but taken in a dilute regime , where it is found by solving the linear balitsky - fadin - kuraev - lipatov ( bfkl ) evolution equation . for the gluon production
was derived in the fixed coupling approximation . however , the dipole amplitudes @xmath23 , @xmath14 and @xmath22 are now known for the running coupling case due to the completion of the running coupling calculations for the bfkl / bk / jimwlk evolution equations @xcite . using the running - coupling bk ( rcbk ) equation ,
the calculational framework presented above , when applied to heavy ion collisions by replacing @xmath24 in , and implemented with a careful inclusion of the nuclear geometry fluctuations , led to the prediction made in @xcite of the charged particle multiplicity as a function of the collision centrality for the lhc .
this prediction was confirmed by the alice data in @xcite .
however , at the time the prediction @xcite was made , the scales of the couplings explicitly shown in eqs .
, , and were not known and had to be modeled .
our goal here is to fix the scales of those couplings for the lowest - order gluon production .
to include running coupling corrections we follow the blm scale - setting procedure @xcite , which is known to be correct at least at the leading order in @xmath25 .
one first needs to resum the contribution of all quark bubble corrections giving powers of @xmath26 , with @xmath27 the number of quark flavors and @xmath28 the physical coupling at some arbitrary renormalization scale @xmath29 .
we then complete @xmath27 to the full beta - function by replacing @xmath30 in the obtained expression . here
@xmath31 is the one - loop qcd beta - function .
after this , the powers of @xmath32 should combine into physical running couplings @xmath33 at various momentum scales @xmath34 which would follow from this calculation .
we use the @xmath35 renormalization scheme . as was originally argued in @xcite ,
including running coupling corrections into the diagrams of below assuming that only a gluon can be produced in the final state would leave one factor of the coupling at an arbitrary renormalization scale @xmath29 .
following @xcite we rectify the problem by redefining the gluon production cross - section to include production of collinear gluon gluon and quark anti - quark pairs with the invariant mass lower than some collinear ir cutoff @xmath36 .
this new observable is completely @xmath29-independent and expressible in terms of the running coupling constants .
gluon production at the lowest order in the coupling is shown in in the @xmath37 light - cone gauge . at this order
the unintegrated gluon distribution is @xmath38 such that reduces to @xmath39 our goal is to set the scales for the three couplings in .
light - cone gauge .
, width=566 ] the final result for the lowest - order gluon production cross section with the running coupling corrections included is @xcite @xmath40 with the momentum scale @xmath34 being a complicated function of @xmath41 and @xmath42 given in @xcite .
an interesting feature is that the scale @xmath43 is complex - valued !
the cross - section is , of course , real , as it contains a complex - valued coupling constant multiplied by its conjugate , @xmath44 .
clearly looks like the fixed - coupling cross - section with three factors of fixed - coupling replaced by the seven running couplings : we chose to refer to this structure as _ the septumvirate _ of couplings @xcite .
an important feature of the scale @xmath34 is that in the @xmath45 ( or @xmath46 ) limit @xmath47 reducing to @xmath48
using the lowest - order expression we would like to conjecture the following running - coupling generalization of : @xmath49 with the new ( rescaled ) distribution functions defined by ( cf .
eqs . and ) @xmath50 and @xmath51 one may use this ansatz , along with @xmath52 obtained from the rcbk evolution to further improve the existing cgc phenomenology for particle multiplicity along with its centrality and rapidity dependence at rhic and lhc .
this research is sponsored in part by the u.s .
department of energy under grant no .
de - sc0004286 .
1 w. a. horowitz and yuri v. kovchegov . . ,
a849:7297 , 2011 .
yuri v. kovchegov and kirill tuchin .
inclusive gluon production in dis at high parton density . ,
d65:074026 , 2002 . m. a. braun . . ,
b483:105114 , 2000 . y. kovchegov and h. weigert . . ,
784:188226 , 2007 . i. i. balitsky . .
, 75:014001 , 2007 .
javier l. albacete and adrian dumitru . .
k. aamodt et al . .
, 106:032301 , 2011 .
stanley j. brodsky , g. peter lepage , and paul b. mackenzie . on the elimination of scale ambiguities in perturbative quantum chromodynamics .
, d28:228 , 1983 .
yuri v. kovchegov and heribert weigert . .
, a807:158189 , 2008 . | proceedings contribution based on @xcite exact analytic formula for gluon production in @xmath2 collisions color glass condensate framework known @xmath3 collisions gluon production classical gluon fields@xmath5 nonlinear quantum evolution given by @xmath1-factorization formula total rapidity interval collision variables two - component transverse plane vectors unintegrated gluon distributions in proton nucleus defined by @xcite @xmath12 forward scattering amplitude for gluon dipole transverse size center at impact parameter scattering on target nucleus total rapidity interval found from jimwlk evolution equation@xmath18 limit related to quark dipole forward scattering amplitude nucleus from bk evolution equation @xmath22 gluon dipole amplitude dilute regime found by solving linear balitsky evolution equation gluon production derived in fixed coupling approximation dipole amplitudes @xmath23 known for running coupling case due completion coupling calculations for bfkl / bk / jimwlk evolution equationsrunning - coupling bk ) equation framework applied to heavy ion collisions replacing @xmath24 nuclear geometry fluctuations prediction charged particle multiplicity function collision centrality lhc confirmed by alice data scales couplings in eqs not known modeled goal to fix scales for lowest - order gluon production corrections follow blm scale - setting procedure @xcite correct at leading order in @xmath25 resum quark bubble corrections powers @xmath26 @xmath27 number quark flavors @xmath28 physical coupling at arbitrary renormalization scale @xmath29 complete @xmath27 to full beta - function replacing @xmath30 @xmath31 one - loop qcd beta - function powers @xmath32 combine into physical running couplings @xmath33 at momentum scales @xmath34 use @xmath35 renormalization scheme running coupling corrections into diagrams gluon produced final state one factor coupling at arbitrary renormalization scale @xmath29 problem redefining gluon production cross - section collinear gluon quark anti - quark pairs with invariant mass lower than collinear ir cutoff @xmath36new observable @xmath29-independent running coupling constants gluon production lowest order shown @xmath37 light - cone gauge unintegrated gluon distribution @xmath38 reduces to @xmath39 goal set scales three couplings final result lowest - order gluon production cross section running coupling corrections @xcite @xmath40 momentum scale @xmath34 complicated function of @xmath41 @xmath42 scale @xmath43 complex - valued cross - section contains complex - valued coupling constant multiplied by conjugate @xmath44 fixed - coupling cross - section three factors replaced seven running couplings septumvirate of couplings @xcite scale @xmath34 @xmath45 or limit @xmath47 to @xmath48 lowest - order expression conjecture running - coupling generalization of @xmath49 new rescaled distribution functions defined @xmath50 @xmath51 use ansatz @xmath52 improve cgc phenomenology for particle multiplicity centrality rapidity dependence at rhic lhc research sponsored by u.s . department of energy grant de - sc0004286 horowitz yuri kovchegov a849:7297 2011kovchegov kirill tuchin gluon production high parton density d65:074026 2002 braun b483:105114 2000 kovchegov weigert 784:188226 2007 balitsky 75:014001 2007 javier albacete adrian dumitru aamodt 106:032301 2011 stanley brodsky peter lepage paul mackenzie elimination scale ambiguities perturbative quantum chromodynamics d28:228 1983 heribert weigert a807:158189 2008 | 0.263815 | 1,554 | 781 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,451 | i address here the question of the mutual interplay of strong correlations and disorder in the system .
i consider random version of the hubbard model .
diagonal randomness is introduced _ via _ random on - site energies and treated by the coherent potential approximation .
strong , short ranged , electron - electron interactions are described by the slave boson technique and found to induce additional disorder in the system . as an example
i calculate the density of states of the random interacting binary alloy and compare it with that for non - interacting system .
pacs numbers : 71.10.fd , 71.23.-k , 71.55.ak . | the list of materials in which carriers are strongly interacting with each other and scatter by random impurities is quite long .
it comprises _ inter alia _ high temperature superconducting oxides @xcite and various heavy fermion alloys @xcite .
two models are usually used to study such system .
it is either hubbard or anderson model suitably extended to allow for the description of real materials . here
the single band hubbard model has been used , as it is the simplest model of correlated system .
the disorder is introduced into the model by allowing for fluctuations of the local on - site energies @xmath0 .
the main purpose of this work is to study the interplay of disorder and correlations in the hubbard model .
i shall present analytical and numerical calculations indicating that correlations induce additional disorder in the system .
_ mutatis mutandis _ disorder in the system affects the parameters of the mott - hubbard metal - insulator transition . in the recent studies of weakly interacting disordered systems
it has been found that due to disorder the interactions scale to strong coupling limit @xcite . here to treat many particle aspect of the problem we use the slave boson technique , which is known to be qualitatively valid for all strength of interaction . in particular
this method reproduces the results of the gutzwiller approximation at the saddle - point level @xcite .
we start here with random version of the hubbard model @xmath1 the meaning of symbols is standard .
the first term describes the hopping of carriers through the crystal specified by lattice sites @xmath2 , @xmath3 .
@xmath4 denotes the fluctuating site energy - it introduces disorder into the model .
@xmath5 is the repulsion between two opposite spin electrons occupying the same site . in the slave boson technique@xcite
one introduces 4 auxiliary boson fields : @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 such that @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 project onto the empty , singly occupied by @xmath12 and doubly occupied site @xmath2 .
the hamiltonian ( 1 ) is in this enlarged hilbert space written as @xmath13 where @xmath14
. equation ( 2 ) is strictly equivalent to ( 1 ) , when the constraints @xmath15 are fulfilled . in disordered system and at @xmath16 = 0 k
, the mean field approach to slave bosons can be formulated by suitably generalizing the clean limit .
one introduces the constraints into hamiltonian with help of langrange multipliers @xmath17 and @xmath18 and replaces boson operators @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 by classical , site dependent , amplitudes @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 .
these amplitudes are calculated from the , configuration dependent , ground state energy @xmath25 by minimizing @xmath26 with respect to all seven parameters @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath27 , @xmath18 . as a result one
gets three constraints : @xmath28 , @xmath29 and four additional equations which read @xmath30 where @xmath31 .
the important next step is connected with calculation of @xmath32 and @xmath33 in the presence of disorder . in principle
these quantities do depend on the particular distribution of all impurities ( i.e. distribution of site energies @xmath4 ) .
we shall calculate them from the corresponding green s function .
we use a version@xcite of the coherent potential approximation ( cpa ) to calculate ( averaged and conditionally averaged ) green s functions . to this end
we rewrite the mean field hamiltonian in the form @xmath34 note , that hamiltonian ( 5 ) contains not only the site dependent parameters @xmath35 but due to correlations there appear also @xmath36 which are the additional source of , diagonal and spin dependent , disorder . besides that
, the parameters @xmath37 , @xmath38 which vary from site to site make effective hopings @xmath39 random quantities .
this off - diagonal ( in wannier space ) disorder is particularly important .
fortunately multiplicative dependence of effective hopping on the kind of atoms at sites @xmath2 and @xmath3 is easy to handle within cpa .
the procedure is standard@xcite and one gets the following equation for the density of states in paramagnetic phase @xmath40}{1-\left [ \sigma ( \varepsilon ^{+})-(\varepsilon -\varepsilon _ { i}+\mu -\lambda _ { i}^{(2)})/\xi _ { i}^{2 } \right ] \,f[\sigma ( \varepsilon ) ] } } \rangle _
{ { \rm imp}}\ ] ] and the coherent potential @xmath41 is determined as a solution of equations @xmath42 \,f[\sigma ( z)]}}\rangle _ { { \rm imp}}=0 \nonumber \\ & & f[\sigma ( z)]={\frac{1}{n}}\sum_{\vec{k}}{\frac{1}{\sigma ( z)-\varepsilon ( \vec{k})}}={\frac{1}{n}}\sum_{\vec{k}}\,\bar{g}_{\vec{k}}(z ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath43 means averaging over disorder and @xmath44 is electron spectrum in host ( clean ) material . to solve equations ( 4 ) one still has to calculate the quantities @xmath45 , which in general depend on the configuration of all impurities in the system .
they can be calculated from the knowledge of the cpa green s functions in the following way .
we assume that site @xmath2 is described by actual parameters _
i.e. _ @xmath4 , @xmath46 , @xmath37 , while all other sites in the system are replaced by effective ones described by the coherent potential @xmath47 and the green s functions @xmath48 .
then it is easy to find that _ e.g_. @xmath49 and @xcite @xmath50 here @xmath51 , and by definition @xmath52 $ ] and @xmath53 this closes the system of equations to be solved in a self - consistent manner . in the next section we show numerical calculations of the effect of correlations on the density of states in disordered alloy .
for the purpose of numerical illustration of the general approach sketched in previous section we calculate here the density of states ( dos ) of perfect interacting , random noninteracting and random interacting systems . for the purpose of numerical analysis we shall assume @xmath54 limit and _ bcc _ crystal structure , which leads to the following canonical tight - binding spectrum of noninteracting carriers in clean material using t=0.0625@xmath56 leads to the noninteracting system bandwidth @xmath57 . in the following all energies and frequencies
are expressed in @xmath56 . the density of states corresponding to this spectrum is well known .
it possesses van hove singularity in the middle of the band , which extends from @xmath58 to @xmath59 .
the spectrum @xmath60 of a clean but interacting system in the @xmath54 limit is replaced by @xmath61 .
the corresponding density of states is thus of the same form but placed in the energy window @xmath62 $ ] and scaled by the factor @xmath63 .
note that in this @xmath54 limit the upper hubbard band is pushed to infinity and not visible .
the changes of the spectrum due to correlations in disordered @xmath64 alloy are illustrated in figure ( 1 ) where we show the averaged @xmath65 and conditionally averaged densities of states @xmath66 and @xmath67 ( @xmath68 , @xmath69 ) without ( fig .
2a ) and with ( fig .
2b ) electron correlations . the carrier concentration @xmath70 .
noninteracting alloy dos is symmetric .
we observe strong asymmetry , the opening of the real gap in the spectrum of interacting carriers and the appreciable increase of the density of states at the fermi level ( taken as e=0 in the figure ) . in conclusion
, we have shown that interplay of disorder and correlations leads to strong renormalisation of the electron spectrum .
let us stress that all other properties of such systems will also be strongly affected by interaction induced disorder .
the calculations of _ dc _ and _ ac _ transport properties are in progress . | list of materials carriers interacting random impurities long comprises high temperature superconducting oxides heavy fermion alloys two models used system hubbard or anderson model real materials single band hubbard model used simplest model correlated system disorder introduced fluctuations local on - site energies main purpose work study interplay of disorder correlations in hubbard model present analytical calculations correlations induce additional disorder disorder affects parameters mott - hubbard metal - insulator transition studies disordered systems due to disorder interactions scale to strong coupling limit use slave boson technique qualitatively valid for all strength interaction reproduces results gutzwiller approximation at saddle - point level @xcite start with random version of hubbard model @xmath1 meaning symbols standard first term describes hopping of carriers through crystal lattice sites @xmath4 fluctuating site energy introduces disorder @xmath5 repulsion between two opposite spin electrons same siteslave boson technique introduces 4 auxiliary boson fields @xmath6 project empty occupied @xmath12 doubly occupied site @xmath2 hamiltonian ( 1 ) enlarged space @xmath13 @xmath14 equation ( 2 ) equivalent to ( 1 ) when constraints @xmath15 fulfilled disordered system @xmath16 = 0 k mean field approach slave bosons formulated generalizing clean limit introduces constraints into hamiltonian langrange multipliers @xmath17 @xmath18 replaces boson operators @xmath19 by classical site dependent amplitudes @xmath22 amplitudes calculated from ground state energy @xmath25 minimizing @xmath26 seven parameters three constraints @xmath28 @xmath29 four additional equations @xmath30 @xmath31 calculation of @xmath32 @xmath33 disorder quantities depend on distribution of impurities site energies @xmath4 ) calculate from green s function use version@xcite coherent potential approximation ( ) calculate green s functionsrewrite mean field hamiltonian @xmath34 hamiltonian ( 5 ) contains site dependent parameters @xmath35 @xmath36 additional source of diagonal spin dependent disorder parameters @xmath37 @xmath38 vary site to site make effective hopings @xmath39 random quantities off - diagonal disorder important multiplicative dependence of effective hopping on atoms at sites @xmath2 @xmath3 easy handle within cpa procedure standard@xcite equation for density of states in paramagnetic phase @xmath40}{1-\left \sigma ( \varepsilon+)-\varepsilon - _}+\mu -\lambda{(2)}/\xi{2\sigma\varepsilon coherent potential @xmath41 determined as solution of equations @xmath42[\sigma ( z\rangle imp}}=0\nonumber\sigma=\frac{1}{n}}\sum\vec{k}}-\varepsilon{k @xmath43 means averaging over disorder @xmath44 is electron spectrum in host materialsolve equations ( 4 ) calculate quantities @xmath45 depend on configuration impurities system calculated from cpa green s functions assume site @xmath2 described by parameters @xmath4 @xmath46 @xmath37 other sites replaced by ones potential @xmath47 green s functions @xmath48 find @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 closes system equations next section numerical calculations effect correlations on density of states in disordered alloy calculate density of states of perfect interacting random noninteracting interacting systems assume @xmath54 limit crystal structure tight - binding spectrum of noninteracting carriers in clean material t=0.0625@xmath56 leads to noninteracting system bandwidth @xmath57 energies frequencies expressed in @xmath56 density of states spectrum known possesses van hove singularity middle band extends from @xmath58 to @xmath59 spectrum @xmath60 interacting system @xmath54 limit replaced by @xmath61 corresponding density of states same form in energy window @xmath62 scaled by factor @xmath63 @xmath54 limit upper hubbard band pushed to infinity not visible changes spectrum due to correlations disordered @xmath64 alloy illustrated figure ( 1 ) averaged @xmath65 conditionally averaged densities states @xmath66 @xmath67 without 2b electron correlations carrier concentration @xmath70 noninteracting alloy dos symmetric strong asymmetry opening gap in spectrum interacting carriers increase density states fermi level e=0 interplay disorder correlations leads to renormalisation electron spectrum other properties systems affected by interaction induced disorder calculations of dc _ ac _ transport properties progress | 0.315215 | 1,853 | 934 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,457 | non - electromagnetic emissions from high energy particles in extreme environments has been studied in the literature by using several variations of the semi - classical formalism .
the detailed mechanisms behind such emissions are of great astrophysical interest since they can alter appreciably the associated energy loss rates . here
, we review the role played by the source proper acceleration @xmath0 in the particle production process .
the acceleration @xmath0 determines the typical scale characterizing the particle production and , moreover , if the massive particle production is inertially forbidden , it will be strongly suppressed for @xmath0 below a certain threshold . in particular , we show that , for the case of accelerated protons in typical pulsar magnetospheres , the corresponding accelerations @xmath0 are far below the pion production threshold . | processes involving particle production in the presence of classical electromagnetic fields @xmath1 can be considered in the context of semi - classical approximation , in which the source particle is described by a classical current with a prescribed trajectory and the emitted particles are considered as fully quantized fields . for the case of
accelerated protons , the inertially forbidden decays via the strong interaction channel like , for instance , @xmath2 and @xmath3 , and via the weak channel , as @xmath4 , have been studied in detail in the semi - classical approximation . for the case of motion under magnetic fields ,
the validity of the semi - classical approximation is warranted if , @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the magnitude of the magnetic field measured in the instantaneous reference frame of the proton , @xmath7 is the usual lorentz factor , and @xmath8 g is a critical value for the magnetic field , denoting the region where a full quantized analysis is mandatory .
provided that condition ( [ chifactor ] ) is obeyed , the semi - classical calculations are accurate and the associated emitted power depends only on the proper acceleration of the source @xcite . for the case of a magnetic field @xmath9 , for instance , the proper acceleration of a ( relativistic ) proton is @xmath10 and , consequently , eq .
( [ chifactor ] ) can be rewritten as @xmath11 the parameter @xmath12 can be defined in a frame independent way as @xmath13 , where @xmath14 stands for the proton momentum . for the case of inertially
forbidden particle production , as those ones explicitly listed above , one naturally expects a strong suppression for quasi - inertiall @xmath15 protons .
we review here the role played by the proper acceleration @xmath0 of the source in the massive particle production , with emphasis on the ranges favoring the massive particle emission channels .
we also discuss the possibility of observing signals of curvature pion radiation from accelerated protons in the magnetosphere of strongly magnetized pulsars . unless otherwise stated , natural units where @xmath16 and the spacetime signature @xmath17 are adopted through this work .
we consider here the following kind of decay process @xmath18 where @xmath19 and @xmath20 are the source particles , described by a classical current corresponding to the states of a two level system following a prescribed classical trajectory with proper acceleration @xmath0 , and @xmath21 are the emitted particles , described by quantized fields .
( for further details , see @xcite , for instance . )
we assume that the respective masses @xmath22 of the emitted particles @xmath21 obeys @xmath23 , where @xmath24 and @xmath25 stands for , respectively , the masses of the source particles @xmath26 and @xmath27 .
if @xmath28 , the process is known to be forbidden for inertial trajectories ( @xmath29 ) .
it is intuitive to expect that , if the source is supposed to follow a prescribed trajectory , the momentum @xmath30 of the emitted particle @xmath31 , measured in the rest frame of the source , must be constrained to @xmath32@xcite . moreover ,
the mean energy @xmath33 of the emitted particles ( also measured in the proton s reference frame ) is of the order of the source proper acceleration@xcite , _
i.e. _ , @xmath34 then , from the condition @xmath35 and @xmath36 without loss of generality , let us assume a uniformly accelerated trajectory along the @xmath37 direction with worldline given by @xmath38 following the same procedure employed in the refs .
@xcite , one obtains the differential decay rate as function of the energy of the emitted pion @xmath39 where @xmath40 is the modified bessel function of order @xmath41 , @xmath42 mev is the @xmath43 mass , and @xmath44 is the effective coupling constant .
the total emitted power is @xmath45 where @xmath46 stands for the meijer g - function@xcite . the corresponding normalized energy distribution , @xmath47 is plotted in fig.([energy ] ) , field for different values of the proper acceleration of the proton
. full line : a = 150 mev , dashed line : a = 500 mev.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] from which it is clear that mean energy of the emitted particles are @xmath48 . from ( [ threshold ] ) and fig.([energy ] ) , one can argue that , if the acceleration is such that @xmath49 the corresponding process ( [ general ] ) becomes energetically favored .
in fact , more precise estimates reveal that the threshold is @xmath50 , where @xmath51 .
hence , the neutral pion production ( [ scalarmeson1 ] ) is expected do be favored for @xmath52 mev . for the physical relevant case of protons in circular motion , one has also exactly the same threshold ( [ scalarmeson ] ) . for such case , the formulas for the neutral pion production ( [ scalarmeson1 ] ) can be obtained from the previously one calculated in @xcite for scalar emissions @xmath53 we notice that , in order to obtain that the total power emission ( [ powerscalar ] ) from eq .
( 4.7 ) of @xcite , one must perform the following modifications on the particle states : @xmath54 ) , @xmath55 is related to the strong coupling constant @xmath56 by @xmath57 the large difference between the strong and the electromagnetic coupling constants will imply a large difference also in the respective emitted powers .
the comparison between ( [ powerscalar ] ) and the larmor formula for the usual synchrotron radiation shows that @xmath58 , where @xmath59 is the electromagnetic coupling constant .
hence , if the proper acceleration of a proton reach the value @xmath60 , the channel ( [ scalarmeson1 ] ) is expect to dominate over the usual synchrotron radiation emission
. it must be emphasized that the formalism presented here can not be applied when the charge currents corresponding to initial and final states are different .
neutral and charged particles follow distinct trajectories in the presence of an electromagnetic field . the related channel @xmath61 for example , requires a different semi - classical formalism .
the formalism and the respective calculations can be found in @xcite ( see also @xcite ) .
pulsar magnetospheres offer many interesting possibilities to test these results involving high energy accelerated particles@xcite .
let us consider , for this purpose , the simplest polar cap models of pulsars @xcite .
for such models , a proton interacts with the dipolar magnetic field of the pulsar and is accelerated by an electric field parallel to the magnetic field lines .
the transverse to the magnetic field component @xmath62 of the proton momentum vanish rapidly due to the usual synchrotron emission .
the protons are accelerated along the magnetic field lines by the electric potential drop of the pulsar , producing photons by curvature radiation .
a particle following a circular trajectory of radius @xmath63 has proper centripetal acceleration given by @xmath64 .
the curvature radius @xmath63 of the magnetic field line of a pulsar is related to the radius @xmath65 of the star and to the light cone radius , @xmath66 through @xmath67 , where @xmath68 is the star period .
then , one has @xmath69 the @xmath70 factor accounts for the efficiency of the polar cap acceleration mechanism @xcite @xmath71 .
also , @xmath72 is the maximum available potential drop near the surface of the star @xcite . taking for a typical young pulsar @xmath73 m
, one has from ( [ acceleration ] ) and ( [ scalarmeson ] ) , the following condition on the star surface magnetic field @xmath74 for the occurrence of pion emission with non negligible intensity .
it is easily verified that even for @xmath75 , the condition ( [ final ] ) is far above of the known pulsars of the atnf catalogue@xcite , see fig .
2 . in fact , a systematic search in the atnf pulsar catalogue for strongly magnetized stars that could accelerate relativistic protons up to the curvature pion production threshold reveals that the best candidate is the 16 ms pulsar j0537 - 6910 , but the corresponding characteristic parameter @xmath76 is too small to give origin to observable signals @xcite . for the 1700 objects in the atnf pulsar
catalogue@xcite with known period @xmath77s and surface magnetic field @xmath78 g .
the shadowed region corresponds to the condition ( 3.3 ) .
all the pulsars in the atnf catalogue are far below the pion production threshold.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0%][bp ]
we have briefly reviewed the role played by the source proper acceleration in the semi - classical approximation for the process of massive particle emission .
unfortunately , we have from eq.([final ] ) and fig .
2 that the necessary threshold for pion production by protons in circular motion is far above the typical acceleration experimented by protons in pulsar magnetospheres . nevertheless , it would be also interesting to investigate , in this context , other radiative processes like photopion production and the inverse compton scattering .
the authors are grateful to a. t. dias , c. o. escobar , g. e. a. matsas , r. opher , s. razzaque , and v. pleitez for enlightening and helpful discussions .
herpay t and patks a 2008 j. phys .
g 35 025201 fregolente d and saa a 2008 phys .
d77 103010 berezinsky v , dolgov a and kachelrie m 1995 phys . lett .
b 351 261 herpay t , razzaque s , patks a and mszros p 2008 j. cosm .
25 tokuhisa a and kajino t 1999 astrophys .
j. 525 l117 ruderman m a and sutherland p g 1975 astrophys .
j. 196 51 harding a k , usov v v and muslimov a g 2005 astrophys .
j. 622 531 vietri m 2008 foundations of high - energy astrophysics theoretical astrophysics ( chicago , il : chicago univ . press ) arons j 2003 astrophys .
j. 589 871 zhang b , dai z g , mszros p , waxman e and harding a k 2003 astrophys .
j. 595 346 harding a k and muslimov a g 2001 astrophys .
j. 556 987 manchester r n , hobbs g b , teoh a and hobbs m 2005 astron . j. 129 1993 [ arxiv : astro - ph/0412641 ] . | particle production electromagnetic fields @xmath1 considered semi - classical approximation source particle described by classical current trajectory emitted particles as quantized fields accelerated protons inertially forbidden decays via strong interaction channel @xmath2 @xmath3 weak channel studied in semi - classical approximation motion under magnetic fields validity approximation warranted if @xmath5 @xmath6 magnitude magnetic field @xmath7 usual lorentz factor @xmath8 g critical value for magnetic field full quantized analysis mandatory condition ( chifactor ] ) obeyed semi - classical calculations accurate emitted power depends on proper acceleration of source @xcite magnetic field @xmath9 proper acceleration of proton is @xmath10 eq. chifactor ] rewritten as @xmath11 parameter @xmath12 defined as @xmath13 @xmath14 for proton momentum inertially forbidden particle production expects strong suppression for quasi - inertiall @xmath15 protons review role proper acceleration @xmath0 of source in massive particle production emphasis on massive particle emission channelsdiscuss observing signals curvature radiation from accelerated protons in magnetosphere strongly magnetized pulsars unless natural units @xmath16 spacetime signature @xmath17 adopted consider decay process @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 source particles described classical current two level system classical trajectory proper acceleration @xmath0 @xmath21 emitted particles described quantized fields details see @xcite assume masses @xmath22 emitted particles @xmath21 obeys @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 masses source particles @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 process forbidden for inertial trajectories @xmath29 ) source prescribed trajectory momentum @xmath30 emitted particle @xmath31 constrained to @xmath32@xcite mean energy @xmath33 of emitted particles measured proton s reference frame order source proper acceleration@xcite @xmath34 condition @xmath35 @xmath36 assume uniformly accelerated trajectory along @xmath37 direction worldline by @xmath38 same procedure refs@xcite obtains differential decay rate function energy emitted pion @xmath39 @xmath40 modified bessel function order @xmath41 @xmath42 mev @xmath43 mass @xmath44 effective coupling constant total emitted power @xmath45 @xmath46 meijer g - function@xcite normalized energy distribution @xmath47 plotted in.([energy ] ) proper acceleration proton full line a = 150 mev dashed line a = 500 mev=45.0% mean energy emitted particles @xmath48 acceleration @xmath49 process general energetically favored estimates threshold @xmath50 @xmath51 neutral pion production scalarmeson1 favored for @xmath52 mev physical case protons in circular motion same threshold scalarmeson ] ) formulas for neutral pion production obtained from calculated @xcite scalar emissions @xmath53 obtain total power emission from eq . ( 4.7 ) @xcite perform modifications on particle states @xmath54 @xmath55 related to strong coupling constant @xmath56 @xmath57 large difference between strong electromagnetic coupling constants large difference emitted powerscomparison between powerscalar larmor formula for synchrotron radiation shows @xmath58 @xmath59 is electromagnetic coupling constant if acceleration proton @xmath60 channel scalarmeson1 ] over synchrotron radiation emission formalism applied when charge currents initial final states different neutral charged particles follow distinct trajectories electromagnetic field channel @xmath61 requires different classical formalism formalism calculations in @xcite pulsar magnetospheres offer test results high energy accelerated particles consider polar cap models of pulsars proton interacts with magnetic field pulsar accelerated by electric field transverse field @xmath62 proton momentum synchrotron emission protons accelerated by electric potential drop pulsar producing photons curvature radiation particle circular trajectory radius @xmath63 has centripetal acceleration by @xmath64 curvature radius @xmath63 magnetic field line pulsar related to radius @xmath65 star light cone radius @xmath66 through @xmath67 @xmath68 is star period @xmath70 factor accounts for efficiency polar cap acceleration mechanism @xcite @xmath71 @xmath72 is maximum potential drop near surface startypical young pulsar @xmath73 m acceleration scalarmeson condition star surface magnetic field @xmath74 pion emission negligible intensity @xmath75 condition final ] ) above known pulsars atnf catalogue@xcite fig . 2 search for strongly magnetized stars accelerate relativistic protons curvature pion production threshold best candidate 16 ms pulsar j0537 - 6910 characteristic parameter @xmath76 too small observable signals @xcite 1700 objects catalogue@xcite period @xmath77s surface magnetic field @xmath78 g shadowed region corresponds condition ( 3.3 ) pulsars below pion production threshold reviewed role source acceleration semi - classical massive particle emission necessary threshold pion production by protons circular motion above typical acceleration pulsar magnetospheres investigate other radiative processes photopion production inverse compton scattering authors grateful to a. t. dias c o. escobar a. matsas r. opher s. razzaque v. pleitez for discussions herpay t patks a 2008 j. phys .35 025201 fregolente 2008 phys 103010 berezinsky dolgov kachelrie 1995 phys 351 261 herpay razzaque patks mszros 2008 tokuhisa kajino t 1999 astrophys j 525 l117 ruderman sutherland 1975 196 51 harding usov muslimov 2005 622 531 vietri 2008 foundations high - energy astrophysics chicago univ press arons 2003 871 zhang dai z mszros waxman harding 2003 595 346 harding muslimov 2001 556 987 manchester r hobbs teoh hobbs m 2005 astron j 129 1993 astro - ph/0412641 | 0.361782 | 2,387 | 1,263 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,467 | we here estimate the mass @xmath0 of the central object in five active galactic nuclei ( agns ) using the most recent reverberation data obtained by the agn watch consortium . the cross - correlation function ( ccf ) centroids of the broad ly@xmath1 @xmath2 and @xmath3 lines are used to estimate the size of the broad line region ( blr ) in these sources .
we calculate the velocity dispersions of these lines in the root mean square ( rms ) spectra , and then use our results to estimate @xmath0 .
we argue that our technique of calculating the velocity dispersion should work in the general case of an arbitrary line profile , unlike methods that depend on the measurement of the full - width at half - maximum ( fwhm ) of the broad line .
we also show that our results agree with the fwhm method in the limit of a normal ( gaussian ) line profile .
the masses calculated here are considerably smaller than those calculated with the previous generation of reverberation data . submitted to the astrophysical journal | with our rapidly expanding knowledge of the galactic center ( see , e.g. , melia 1999 ) , we now have a real hope of unraveling how the blrs in agns are produced , and how they evolve spatially and temporally .
an understanding of the structure of the blr in turn is important in determining how the gaseous environment behaves near the central engine , presumably a supermassive black hole ( smbh ) , in these sources . unlike the galactic center , however , where we know the mass very accurately ( e.g. , @xcite ; @xcite ) , we do not yet have a reliable estimate of @xmath0 for these objects .
but since all of the relevant length scales depend on the central mass , one may reasonably expect that a careful modeling of these environments with temporally resolved line profiles can provide us with a tightly constrained range of values for @xmath0 .
reverberation methods ( e.g. , @xcite ; @xcite ) have become popular tools for estimating the blr size in agns .
the cross - correlation function ( ccf ) centroid @xmath4 for a given line , typically measured in days , represents a delay between a change in the continuum flux and a corresponding ( presumably causal ) change in the line flux . from it
, we can infer the responsivity - weighted mean radius , @xmath5 , of the line - emitting gas , assuming the delay is due to light - travel time effects ( @xcite ) .
if we make the very reasonable assumption that the central mass dominates the motion of the blr gas , the velocity dispersion @xmath6 of this line can then be used to estimate the central mass , @xmath7 , where @xmath8 is a corrective factor of order unity representing our uncertainty in the geometry and isotropy of the blr .
an example of how this works in a simplified case , where the velocity distribution of the gas is such that the line profile in the root mean square ( rms ) spectrum assumes a roughly gaussian shape , has recently been studied by peterson & wandel ( 1999 ) . using the uv and optical data for ngc 5548 from the extensive monitoring campaigns conducted by the agn watch consortium ( see , e.g. , @xcite ; @xcite ) , they computed the rms spectrum from the set of individual spectra .
the line profiles in the rms spectrum represent those portions of the emission lines that are actually varying in response to the continuum fluctuations , and therefore correspond to the ccf measurements . using this method ,
the fwhm of each line is measured directly from the line profile , and a velocity dispersion is calculated according to the relation @xmath9 .
using the reported values of @xmath4 , they obtained a central mass in this source of @xmath10 .
however , although estimating the velocity dispersion from the fwhm is valid in the case of a gaussian or other regular ( e.g. , laplacian ) line profile , this method can not be used in the general case where the line profile is highly irregular . in this paper , we introduce a more generally applicable method to calculate the velocity dispersion directly , and show that our results agree with the fwhm procedure in the limit of a gaussian profile .
we avoid the simplifying assumptions concerning the line shape , which allows us to significantly broaden the class of objects for which the central mass may be estimated using reverberation methods .
we have assembled and analyzed the uv data obtained with agn watch observations of five agns : 3c 390.3 ( @xcite ) , fairall 9 ( @xcite ) , ngc 3783 ( @xcite ) , ngc 5548 during the @xmath11 fos campaign ( @xcite ) , and ngc 7469 ( @xcite ) .
the first object in this list is classified as a broad - line radio galaxy , whereas the others are seyfert 1 galaxies .
the mean and rms spectra corresponding to each data set have been determined according to the procedure described in rodriguez - pascual , et al .
( 1997 ) , and are shown for each of the five sources individually in figures 1 and 2 .
these spectra have already appeared in the references cited above , but we reproduce them here as a class to demonstrate the range of line profiles one typically encounters with this process , and also to show the wavelength band used for each of the lines in our analysis ( see below ) . we have selected the ly@xmath12 and @xmath3 lines for our analysis because they typically have the strongest signal - to - noise ratios . in those cases where the ( redshifted ) ly@xmath1 line has been contaminated by geocoronal emission , we have attempted to set the lower bound of the wavelength bins beyond the contamination region .
however , the ly@xmath1 lines in ngc 5548 and ngc 7469 still show significant contamination ( see fig .
[ fig:2spectra ] ) . in all these objects ,
the ly@xmath1 line is further contaminated by @xmath13 , but no attempt to deblend these two lines has been made here .
the net effect of this is to increase our estimate of the ly@xmath1 velocity dispersion .
these contaminants make the ly@xmath1 measurements much less reliable than the measurements , which are only slightly affected by , e.g. , @xmath14 .
these broad line profiles are understood to be produced by the composite emissivity of a broad line region ( blr ) comprised of distinct clouds , which constitute a distribution in velocity around the central mass concentration . along any given line - of - sight ,
say the @xmath15-axis , the velocity dispersion of these emitters is defined as @xmath16 where clearly @xmath17 denotes the @xmath15-component of the total velocity vector @xmath18 .
then , assuming that @xmath19 , we can approximate the doppler - shift formula as @xmath20 , where @xmath21 is the wavelength in the emitter s frame .
thus , as long as the velocity field is isotropic ( i.e. , @xmath22 ) , this relation can be used to replace @xmath17 in equation ( [ eq : sigma_z ] ) , and thereby to obtain an expression for @xmath6 in terms of observable quantities : @xmath23 the mean values of @xmath24 and @xmath25 appearing on the right hand side of this expression are often calculated from the data assuming that the line profiles are gaussian , for which a determination of the fwhm is then sufficient . to keep this procedure as general as possible ,
we here instead calculate the expectation ( or mean ) value @xmath26 of any given function @xmath27 of @xmath25 using a flux - weighted sum : @xmath28 where @xmath29 is the ( continuum - subtracted ) line flux at wavelength @xmath25 and the summation is taken over the appropriate wavelength bins @xmath30 .
the uncertainty in the calculated value of @xmath31 is then estimated by assigning the highest and lowest plausible values for the underlying continuum . in our calculation of @xmath0 ,
we have used the values of @xmath4 published in the references cited above for the 5 sources considered here .
the uncertainty in the value of @xmath4 is estimated using the monte carlo techniques described in white & peterson ( 1994 ) ; however , rather than using a thin shell model for the blr , we have instead assumed an extended blr consistent with the observations and the general inferences drawn from modeling ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
we chose the line response function to be @xmath32 over the range of radii @xmath33 , where @xmath34 is the cloud emission anisotropy and @xmath35 and @xmath36 are the inner and outer radial extents , respectively , of the blr .
for example , a @xmath37 that is fairly constant over all blr radii is consistent with the density and velocity fields required to model the @xmath3 line in fairall 9 ( @xcite ) .
the inner extent of the blr is set to correspond with the @xmath14 cross - correlation lag ( typically having the shortest lag of any of the broad emission lines ) , and the outer extent is optimized such that a histogram of modeled line delays peaks at the observed line lag ( see @xcite ) .
we used the values of @xmath38 for ly@xmath39 and @xmath40 for @xmath3 calculated by ferland , et al .
( 1992 ) .
table [ tbl-1 ] summarizes the results of these calculations .
our estimates of the errors associated with @xmath4 are much higher than those obtained using a thin - shell blr model .
this is intuitively correct , since we would expect an extended blr to show a much broader , flatter ccf . in most cases , our extended blr model also yields larger error estimates for @xmath4 than the model - independent method described in peterson , et al . (
1998 ) , which estimates errors based on uncertainties due to the observational sampling and the flux measurements only .
this suggests that the latter method underestimates the actual uncertainty if the blr is indeed spatially extended .
the sources of error in @xmath31 include the uncertain fitting of the continuum level , the blending of the broad line wings with the continuum , and line contamination ( as discussed above ) .
since only the former is included in our error estimates , the @xmath31 errors we quote here are probably underestimated .
we also restate that the values of @xmath0 listed in table [ tbl-1 ] are subject to corrective factors of order unity , stemming from our assumption of an isotropic velocity field . the last column in table [ tbl-1 ]
lists the masses estimated by wandel , et al .
( 1999 ) for the same objects using h@xmath41 reverberation data .
their results assume a gaussian line profile ( usually a good approximation for the h@xmath41 lines ) and use the fwhm to estimate the velocity dispersion .
they use the model - independent method of peterson , et al .
( 1998 ) to estimate the uncertainty in @xmath4 , so their reported mass errors may be underestimated ( as discussed above ) .
perhaps the most striking inference we can draw from an inspection of table [ tbl-1 ] is that the masses calculated here are considerably lower than those estimated using older reverberation data .
for example , koratkar & gaskell ( 1991b ) predicted masses of @xmath42 , @xmath43 , and @xmath44 for ngc 3783 , ngc 5548 , and fairall 9 , respectively .
the main discrepancy seems to be that the higher ( and regularly - spaced ) sampling rate adopted by the agn watch has facilitated the detection of shorter time scale variations and cross - correlation lags for these objects .
an additional effect stems from our use of the rms spectrum rather than the mean spectrum to estimate @xmath45 or @xmath31 .
a cursory glance at figures [ fig:3spectra ] and [ fig:2spectra ] suggests that the velocity dispersions of the rms spectral lines are _ smaller _ than those of the mean spectra .
the physical interpretation of this effect is not yet clear , though it may be signaling that the emission from the innermost blr gas does not vary strongly in response to continuum changes .
our mass estimates agree with the wandel , et al .
( 1999 ) results within error bars in all cases except the ly@xmath1 results of 3c 390.3 and ngc 3783 .
the ngc 5548 mass estimate is also consistent with the result obtained by peterson & wandel ( 1999 ) using the same spectral data , though with the assumption that the lines are gaussian .
collier et al .
( 1998 ) estimated the mass of ngc 7469 using the spectral variability in the optical regime combined with a measurement of @xmath45 for the h@xmath39 and h@xmath41 lines to obtain a mass for this object of @xmath46 , which is again consistent with our result .
these cases provide some support for the validity of our method , since they show a consistent mass determination for sources that have `` normal '' ( i.e. , gaussian ) line profiles .
our method is clearly more general , since it appears to be applicable also to sources in which the velocity distribution of the blr does not naturally produce a gaussian line shape .
a caveat one must consider with this procedure is that the error associated with the ly@xmath1 fit can be significant .
the mass estimates made using the ly@xmath1 data are higher than those based on the line in all cases except fairall 9 . as we discussed above , this is probably due to a contamination of the line , which suggests that the results may be more reliable .
it is possible that this problem may be alleviated by line deblending techniques , which we have not incorporated into our analysis here .
our results support the argument made by peterson & wandel ( 1999 ) that a very large mass must be present within a distance of a few light - days from the centers of many agns . for the class of @xmath47 objects in our sample ,
this mass is at least @xmath48 , which is rather compelling evidence for the presence of a point - like object .
this mass density is even higher than that in the galactic center , where we are reasonably sure that the enclosed mass within @xmath49 pc of the nucleus is close to @xmath50 .
alternative models for the latter that invoke a distribution of dark objects , such as neutron stars , white dwarfs , or @xmath51 black holes , can now be ruled out on the basis that in equilibrium , such a distribution would have a core radius significantly larger than the observed limiting size of @xmath49 pc . in the sample of agns considered here
, this exclusion of a distributed dark matter contribution to the enclosed mass appears to be even stronger ( cf .
maoz 1998 ) .
one of the most important results presented here is the relatively accurate determination of the central point mass in these objects . with the exclusion of 3c 390.3 , which appears to belong to a different mass class , the masses of the other four agns ( all seyfert i s ) are very close to each other and are near the low end of the mass scale for agns
this characteristic , and the fact that the smbh at the galactic center has a mass within a factor of @xmath52 or so of this range , hints at a possibly similar formation and evolutionary history for these nuclei . in the galactic center , the power generated by the supermassive black hole seems to be the quasi - steady accretion of plasma ejected by wind - producing stars in the circumnuclear environment , with a rate @xmath53 yr@xmath54 ( coker & melia 1997 ) .
thus , given a central mass @xmath55 , the characteristic time @xmath56 billion years suggests that the black hole sgr a * may have grown to its current size gradually over a hubble time via the steady accretion of gas from its environment .
we speculate that the nuclei in the 4 seyfert i s we have considered here may themselves have formed and evolved in a similar fashion , and that the range in masses may therefore be due principally to a variation of the nuclear gas density from which the black holes accrete .
this work was supported by an nsf graduate fellowship at the university of arizona , by a sir thomas lyle fellowship for distinguished overseas visitors at the university of melbourne , and by nasa grant nag58239 .
we thank bradley peterson for helpful discussions . | expanding knowledge galactic center melia 1999 ) hope of unraveling blrs in agns produced evolve spatially temporally understanding structure blr important gaseous environment near central engine supermassive black hole ( smbh ) unlike galactic center know mass accurately @xcite reliable estimate of @xmath0 for objects relevant length scales depend on central mass modeling resolved line profiles constrained range values for @xmath0 reverberation methods @xcite ; popular tools for estimating blr size in agns cross - correlation function ( ccf ) centroid @xmath4 for line measured in days represents delay between continuum flux change line flux infer responsivity - weighted mean radius @xmath5 of line - emitting gas delay due to light - travel time effects @xcite ) central mass dominates motion blr gas velocity dispersion @xmath6 of line used to estimate central mass , @xmath7 @xmath8 corrective factor of order unity uncertainty in geometry isotropy blrexample simplified velocity distribution gas line profile in root mean rms spectrum assumes gaussian shape studied by peterson & wandel ( 1999 ) uv optical data for ngc 5548 from monitoring agn watch consortium computed rms spectrum from individual spectra line profiles in rms spectrum represent emission lines varying continuum fluctuations correspond to ccf measurements fwhm each line measured from line profile velocity dispersion calculated according to relation @xmath9 using reported values of @xmath4 obtained central mass in source @xmath10 estimating velocity dispersion from fwhm valid in gaussian or regular line profile not used in general case where line profile highly irregular paper introduce generally applicable method to calculate velocity dispersion directly results agree with fwhm procedure in gaussian profile avoid simplifying assumptions line shape broaden class of objects for central mass estimated using reverberation methods assembled analyzed uv data with agn watch observations of five agns : 3c 390.3 fairall 9 ngc 3783 ngc 5548 ngc 7469first object broad - line radio galaxy others are seyfert 1 galaxies mean rms spectra each data set determined procedure rodriguez - pascual , et al . ( 1997 ) shown for five sources in figures 1 and 2 spectra appeared in references reproduce as class range line profiles show wavelength band used for lines analysis selected ly@xmath12 and @xmath3 lines strongest signal - to - noise ratios ly@xmath1 line contaminated by geocoronal emission attempted to set lower bound wavelength bins beyond contamination region ly@xmath1 lines in ngc 5548 and ngc 7469 show significant contamination fig:2spectra ly@xmath1 line contaminated by @xmath13 no attempt to deblend lines estimate ly@xmath1 velocity dispersion contaminants make ly@xmath1 measurements less reliable than slightly affected by @xmath14 broad line profiles produced by composite emissivity of broad line region distinct clouds distribution in velocity around central mass concentrationline sight @xmath15-axis velocity dispersion emitters defined as @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath15-component of total velocity vector @xmath18 assuming @xmath19 doppler - shift formula as @xmath20 @xmath21 wavelength emitter s frame velocity field isotropic @xmath22 relation replace @xmath17 equation sigma_z obtain expression for @xmath6 observable quantities : @xmath23 mean values of @xmath24 @xmath25 right side calculated data line profiles gaussian determination fwhm sufficient calculate expectation value @xmath26 of function @xmath27 @xmath25 using flux - weighted sum : @xmath28 @xmath29 continuum - subtracted line flux at wavelength @xmath25 summation over wavelength bins @xmath30 uncertainty in calculated value @xmath31 estimated by assigning highest lowest plausible values for underlying continuum calculation @xmath0 used values @xmath4 references for 5 sourcesuncertainty in value @xmath4 estimated using monte carlo techniques white & peterson 1994 ) thin shell model assumed extended blr consistent with observations inferences modeling chose line response function @xmath32 over range radii @xmath33 @xmath34 cloud emission anisotropy @xmath35 @xmath36 inner outer radial extents of blr @xmath37 constant over blr radii consistent with density velocity fields @xmath3 line in fairall 9 inner extent with @xmath14 cross - correlation lag shortest lag outer extent optimized modeled line delays peaks at observed line lag used values @xmath38 for@xmath39 @xmath40 for @xmath3 calculated by ferland , et al . ( 1992 ) table summarizes results estimates of errors @xmath4 higher than thin - blr model extended blr broader flatter ccf extended blr model yields larger error estimates for @xmath4 than - independent method peterson et al . ( 1998 ) estimates errors based on uncertainties observational sampling flux measurements method underestimates uncertainty if blr spatially extendedsources error in @xmath31 include uncertain fitting continuum level blending line wings line contamination former included in estimates @xmath31 errors underestimated values of @xmath0 table subject to corrective factors order unity isotropic velocity field last column lists masses estimated by wandel , et al . 1999 ) for objects using h@xmath41 reverberation data results assume gaussian line profile use fwhm to estimate velocity dispersion model - independent method of peterson , et al . 1998 ) to estimate uncertainty in @xmath4 reported mass errors may be underestimated masses calculated lower than older reverberation data koratkar & gaskell 1991b predicted masses of @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 for ngc 3783 ngc 5548 fairall 9 higher sampling rate by agn watch facilitated detection of shorter time scale variations cross - correlation lags additional effect from use rms spectrum mean spectrum to estimate @xmath45 or @xmath31glance at figures suggests velocity dispersions of rms spectral lines smaller than mean spectra physical interpretation not clear may emission from innermost blr gas strongly continuum changes mass estimates agree with wandel et al . ( 1999 ) results within error bars except ly@xmath1 results of 3c 390.3 and ngc 3783 ngc 5548 mass estimate consistent with peterson & wandel ( 1999 ) assumption lines gaussian collier et al . ( 1998 ) estimated mass of ngc 7469 using spectral variability measurement of @xmath45 for h@xmath39 lines mass object of @xmath46 consistent with our result cases support validity our method show consistent mass determination for normal gaussian line profiles our method general applicable to sources velocity distribution gaussian line shape error ly@xmath1 fit can be significant mass estimates using ly@xmath1 data higher than line in all cases except fairall 9 probably due to contamination of line results reliable problem alleviated by line deblending techniques not incorporated results support argument peterson & wandel 1999 large mass must present within few light - days from centers of many agnsclass @xmath47 objects mass least @xmath48 compelling evidence for point - like object mass density higher in galactic center enclosed mass within @xmath49 pc nucleus close to @xmath50 alternative models distribution dark objects holes ruled out equilibrium distribution core radius larger than limiting size @xmath49 pc sample agns exclusion of distributed dark matter contribution mass stronger cf maoz 1998 ) important accurate determination of central point mass objects exclusion of 3c 390.3 different mass class masses other four agns seyfert i s close near low end of mass scale for agns smbh at galactic center mass within factor @xmath52 hints similar formation evolutionary history nuclei galactic center power by supermassive black hole quasi - steady accretion of plasma ejected by wind - producing stars circumnuclear rate @xmath53 yr@xmath54 ( coker & melia 1997 ) central mass @xmath55 characteristic time @xmath56 billion years suggests black hole sgr a * may grown to current size gradually via steady accretion of gasspeculate nuclei in 4 seyfert i s formed evolved similar range in masses due to variation nuclear gas density black holes accrete work supported by nsf graduate fellowship university arizona sir thomas lyle fellowship university melbourne nasa grant nag58239 thank bradley peterson for discussions | 0.568438 | 3,419 | 1,769 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,480 | recently petersen defined a new mahonian index @xmath0 over the symmetric group @xmath1 and proved that @xmath2 and @xmath3 have the same joint distribution .
foata and han proved that the pairs of set - valued statistics @xmath4 have the same joint distribution over @xmath1 . in this paper
we introduce the set - valued statistics @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 and @xmath8 and generalize simultaneously results of petersen and foata - han and find many equidistributed triples of set - valued statistics and quadruples of statistics . | let @xmath1 be the symmetric group of @xmath9:=\{1,2,\dots , n\}$ ] . for @xmath10
, define the _ inversion _ statistic @xmath11 by @xmath12 and the _ cycle _ statistic @xmath13 by @xmath14 we say a permutation statistic over @xmath1 is _ mahonian _ if it is equidistributed with @xmath11 , and is _ stirling _ if with @xmath15 . for example , it is well known that the _ right to left minimum _
statistic @xmath16 , defined by @xmath17 is stirling .
recently petersen found a new mahonian statistic @xmath0 , called the _ sorting index _ ( see section 2 for definition ) , and proved the following : [ thm : petersen ] the pairs of statistics @xmath2 and @xmath3 have the same joint distribution over @xmath1 .
also , we have @xmath18_q-1),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath19_q:=1+q+q^2+\dots + q^{r-1}$ ] . a combinatorial proof is found by chen et al .
@xcite via a bijection @xmath20 such that @xmath21 where @xmath22 means @xmath23 .
the bijection @xmath24 turns out to be of the form @xmath25 a composition of @xmath26-code and @xmath27-code introduced by foata and han @xcite . by defining the set - values statistics _
right - to - left minimum letters _
@xmath28 , _ left - to - right maximum places _ @xmath29 and the _ cycle set _
@xmath30 respectively by @xmath31 @xmath32 and @xmath33 foata and han derived the following set - valued joint equidistribution results .
[ thm : foata_han ] the followings hold . 1 . for @xmath34 , we have @xmath35 2 . the set - valued statistics
@xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 are symmetric and joint equidistributed over @xmath1 .
the motivation of this work is to generalize above two theorems , to see if there is a set - valued version of petersen s result or other pairs of set - valued statistics having the same distribution la foata and han .
it turns out that we can have them both . throughout the paper a statistic
is set - valued if and only if the first letter is in capital . by introducing new set - valued statistics @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 and @xmath8 ( see section 2 for definitions ) and corresponding ordinary statistics @xmath39 , @xmath40 , our first main theorem extends simultaneously both petersen and foata - han s results .
[ thm : main ] we have : 1 . for @xmath41 ,
the following holds : @xmath42 2 .
the quadruple statistics @xmath43 and @xmath44 have the same joint distribution over @xmath1 , and @xmath45_q+yq^{r-1}-1-q^{r-1}).\end{aligned}\ ] ] theorem [ thm : main ] generalizes theorem [ thm : petersen ] and theorem [ thm : foata_han ] ( 1 ) .
we will see that theorem [ thm : foata_han ] ( 2 ) will be generalized in a later theorem . by abuse of terminology
, a set - valued statistic is called mahonian ( or stirling ) if the corresponding ordinary statistic is so .
our second result is to find triples of set - valued stirling statistics having the same joint distribution as @xmath46 and @xmath47 . by switching between certain set - valued statistics by applying invese ,
reverse , or complement operations on permutations , we obtain @xmath48 more ( and @xmath49 partial ) triples of set - valued statistics having the same joint distribution .
see theorem [ thm : set_all ] for the complete list . from these
we obtain two sets of symmetric and equidistributed pairs of set - valued statistics , the first of which includes those three pairs in theorem [ thm : foata_han ] ( 2 ) .
the third part of the work is to derive quadruples of statistics which are joint equidistributed with @xmath50 and @xmath51 .
note that the first statistic is mahonian and the others are stirling .
again by switching among statistics , in theorem [ thm : sta_all ] we derive @xmath52 more ( and @xmath53 partial ) quadruples of statistics having the same joint distribution .
the rest of the paper is organized as follows .
definitions and preliminary results will be put in section [ sec : preli ] . in section
[ sec : main_proof ] we prove theorem [ thm : main ] .
section [ sec : triples ] is devoted to triples of set - valued statistics , and section [ sec : quadruples ] to quadruples of ordinary statistics .
we first introduce the @xmath27- and @xmath26-code of foata and han @xcite , which are the key tools of this paper . given @xmath34 , define its _ lehmer code _
@xcite by @xmath54 where @xmath55 let @xmath56 .
it is clear that @xmath57 is a bijection .
@xmath27-code _ of a permutation @xmath58 is defined by @xmath59 for example , let @xmath60 . then @xmath61 and @xmath62 .
@xmath26-code _ of @xmath58 is defined in the following way . for each @xmath63 , let @xmath64 be the smallest integer such that @xmath65 . define @xmath66 equivalently , @xmath67 can be determined from the cycle decomposition of @xmath58 .
assume that @xmath68 appears in a cycle @xmath69 .
if @xmath68 is the smallest element of @xmath69 , then set @xmath70 ; otherwise , choose @xmath71 to be the first element @xmath72 in @xmath69 with respect to the reverse direction such that @xmath73 .
for example , let @xmath74
. then @xmath75 . by definition
it is easy to see that @xmath26-code is a bijection from @xmath1 to @xmath76 .
define the _ left - to - right minimum letters _
statistic @xmath6 , the set - valued _ left - to - right minimum places _ statistic @xmath77 and the _ left to right minimun _
statistic @xmath39 respectively by @xmath78 @xmath79 and @xmath80 it is easy to see that @xmath81 . for an integer sequence @xmath82 ,
define @xmath83 , the set of indices with values @xmath84 .
it turns out that @xmath77 and @xmath6 correspond to lehmer code and @xmath27-code respectively .
the proof of the following lemma is directly by definition .
we have @xmath85 hence it is natural to consider the statistic corresponding to @xmath26-code .
define the set - valued statistic @xmath8 by @xmath86 for example , @xmath87 .
we have the following combinatorial interpretation of @xmath8 , which explains the somewhat awkward notation , standing for the _ left - to - right minimum of the shifted cycle containing @xmath84_. for @xmath34 , write the the cycle containing @xmath84 in the way that @xmath84 is at the end of the cycle and denote the resulting cycle @xmath88
. then @xmath89 by regarding @xmath88 as a word . by the definition of @xmath26-code , @xmath90
if and only if @xmath91 and all letters on the left of @xmath68 in @xmath88 are larger than @xmath68 .
in other words , @xmath68 is a left - to - right minimum letter in @xmath88 .
then we have @xmath92 . for the running example , @xmath93 and the shifted cycle is @xmath94 , hence @xmath95 .
also , @xmath6 and @xmath8 are related via @xmath24 . [
lem : afterphi1 ] we have @xmath96 from , and the definition of @xmath24 , we have @xmath97 the goal of this subsection is to define and investigate the set - valued statistics @xmath7 and @xmath5 .
first we need the concept of the _ induced set_. [ defi : induce_set ] given @xmath98 , define its _ induced set _
@xmath99 according to the following algorithm : 1 . set @xmath100 with the initial values @xmath101 and @xmath102 .
2 . for @xmath68 from @xmath103
down to @xmath84 do the followings : 1 .
let @xmath104 be the @xmath105-th smallest element among @xmath106 , 2 .
add ordered pairs @xmath107 into @xmath108 for those @xmath109 with @xmath110 .
if there is no such @xmath72 then skip this step .
3 . delete @xmath104 from @xmath106 .
3 . define @xmath111 for example , for @xmath112 we have [ cols="^,^,^,<",options="header " , ] and the generating function with respect to the first three statistics in each quadruple is @xmath113_q+yq^{r-1}-1-q^{r-1}).\ ] ] observe that @xmath114 and @xmath115 for @xmath116 .
the proof is done via the following mappings .
@xmath117 from the list we can read off many pairs of symmetric and joint equidistributed statistics .
in each of the following items , the pairs of statistics are symmetric and joint equidistributed over @xmath1 .
1 . @xmath118 , @xmath119 , @xmath120 , @xmath121 , @xmath122 , and @xmath123 .
the generating function with respect to each pair is @xmath124 .
2 . @xmath125 , @xmath126 , @xmath127 , and @xmath128 .
in this short paper we generalize simultaneously petersen and foata - han s results to more than two statistics and find many triples or quadruples of statistics having the same joint distribution over @xmath1 . in all quadruples ,
the first statistic is mahonian while the others are stirling , and we then read off many symmetric equidistributed pairs of stirling statistics .
however , it is well known that there are pairs of mahonian statistics with a symmetric joint distribution as well @xcite , for examples , @xmath129 and @xmath130 are two of them
. hence it would be interesting to generalize our results further to include more mahonian statistics .
on the other hand , the generating function obtained in theorem [ thm : main ] only involves three of the four statistics , hence a natural question is to find a four - variable generating function including @xmath131 as well .
we leave them to the interested reader . | @xmath1 symmetric group @xmath9=\{1,2,\dots n$ @xmath10 define inversion statistic @xmath11 @xmath12 cycle statistic @xmath13 @xmath14 permutation statistic @xmath1 mahonian equidistributed @xmath11 stirling @xmath15 right to left minimum statistic @xmath16 defined @xmath17 stirling petersen found mahonian statistic @xmath0 sorting index statistics @xmath2 @xmath3 joint distribution @xmath1 @xmath18_q-1){aligned @xmath19_q:=1+q+q^2+\dots + q^{r-1}$ combinatorial proof chen et al bijection @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 bijection @xmath24 @xmath25 composition @xmath26-code @xmath27-code foata han defining set - values statistics right - to - left minimum letters @xmath28 left - to - right maximum places @xmath29 cycle set @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 derived set - valued joint equidistribution results @xmath34 @xmath35 2 .set - valued statistics @xmath36 symmetric equidistributed over @xmath1 motivation to generalize theorems set - valued version of petersen s result or pairs statistics same distribution la foata and han can have them both statistic set - valued if first letter in capital introducing new set - valued statistics @xmath5 section 2 definitions ordinary statistics @xmath39 first theorem extends petersen foata - han s results @xmath41 holds @xmath42 quadruple statistics @xmath43 @xmath44 same joint distribution over @xmath1 @xmath45 theorem generalizes theorem petersen foata_han generalized in later theorem set - valued statistic called mahonian or stirling if corresponding ordinary statistic is so second result find triples of set - valued stirling statistics same joint distribution as @xmath46 @xmath47 switching between set - valued statistics applying reverse complement operations on permutations obtain @xmath48 more @xmath49 partial ) triples of set - valued statistics same joint distributiontheorem thm : set_all complete list obtain two sets symmetric equidistributed pairs set - valued statistics first includes three pairs theorem foata_han third part derive quadruples statistics joint equidistributed with @xmath50 @xmath51 first statistic mahonian others stirling switching statistics theorem thm sta_all derive @xmath52 more @xmath53 partial quadruples same joint distribution paper organized definitions preliminary results section [ sec : preli ] section sec main_proof prove theorem thm : main ] section triples set - valued statistics quadruples ordinary statistics introduce @xmath27- @xmath26-code foata han @xcite key tools @xmath34 define code @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 bijection @xmath27-code permutation @xmath58 defined by @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath26-code _ @xmath58 defined each @xmath63 @xmath64 smallest integer @xmath65 define @xmath66 @xmath67 determined from cycle decomposition @xmath58 @xmath68 appears cycle @xmath69 @xmath68 smallest element @xmath69 set @xmath70 choose @xmath71 first element @xmath72 @xmath69 reverse direction @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath26-code bijection @xmath1 to @xmath76 define left - to - right minimum letters statistic @xmath6 set - valued left - to - right minimum places statistic @xmath77 left right @xmath39 @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 integer sequence @xmath82 define @xmath83 indices values @xmath84 @xmath77 @xmath6 correspond lehmer code @xmath27-code proof @xmath85 statistic @xmath26-code define set - valued statistic @xmath8 by @xmath86 @xmath87 combinatorial interpretation @xmath8 left - to - right minimum shifted cycle containing @xmath84 @xmath34 cycle @xmath84 end cycle denote resulting cycle @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath88 word definition @xmath26-code @xmath90 @xmath91 letters left @xmath68 @xmath88 larger than @xmath68 @xmath68 left - to - right minimum letter @xmath88 @xmath92running example @xmath93 shifted cycle @xmath94 hence @xmath95 @xmath6 @xmath8 related via @xmath24 @xmath96 definition of @xmath24 @xmath97 goal define investigate set - valued statistics @xmath7 @xmath5 concept of _ induced set_ @xmath98 define induced set @xmath99 algorithm set @xmath100 with initial values @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath68 from @xmath103 to @xmath84 @xmath104 be @xmath105-th smallest element among @xmath106 add ordered pairs @xmath107 into @xmath108 @xmath109 with @xmath110 no @xmath72 skip step delete @xmath104 from @xmath106 define @xmath111 @xmath112 generating function first three statistics quadruple @xmath113_q+yq @xmath114 @xmath115 for @xmath116 proof via mappings @xmath117 pairs of symmetric joint equidistributed statistics pairs statistics symmetric equidistributed over @xmath1 @xmath118 @xmath119 @xmath120 @xmath121 @xmath122 @xmath123generating function each pair is @xmath124 @xmath125 paper generalize petersen foata - han s results to more than two statistics find triples quadruples of statistics same joint distribution over @xmath1 quadruples first statistic mahonian others stirling symmetric equidistributed pairs stirling statistics pairs mahonian statistics with symmetric joint distribution @xmath129 and @xmath130 are two to generalize results include more mahonian statistics generating function in theorem [ : main involves three of four statistics question find four - variable generating function including @xmath131 leave interested reader | 0.351345 | 2,524 | 1,336 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,490 | data analysis of the ccd files from x ray magnetic resonance scattering linearly polarized in transmission geometry produces information about the radial and azimuthal intensities . in a series of measurements of increasing photon energies trends in data are analyzed . | magnetic thin film systems and multilayer systems have been studies very actively because of their magnetic properties and possible application for practical devices , such as magnetic recording media technologies .
samples were grown on smooth , low - stress , 160 nm .
thick sinx membranes by magnetron sputtering ; they all had 20 nm .
thick pt buffer layers and 3 nm .
thick pt caps . between the buffer layer and the cap , the samples had 50 repeating units of a 0.4 nm .
thick cobalt layer and a 0.7 nm .
thick pt layer .
experiments used linearly polarized x rays from the advanced light source at lawrence berkeley laboratory ( supported by usdoe ) , the thirteenth harmonic of the beamline 9 , undulator gap of 54 mm . near the resonant cobalt l edge . to achieve transverse coherence , the raw undulator beam was passed through a 35 micron diameter pinhole before being scattered in transmission by the sample .
the distance from the sample to the ccd is 118 cm .
the resonant magnetic scattering was collected by the princeton soft x - ray ccd camera 1024 x 1024 pixels in an area one inch by one inch .
the intensity of the raw undulator beam was 2 x 10 ` * * ` 14 photons / sec . , the intensity of the coherent beam was 2 x 10 ` * * ` 12 photons / sec . ,
and the intensity of the scattered beam , was 2 x 10 ` * * ` 7 photons / sec . each speckle pattern was measured for 30 to 100 seconds , so the total number of photons in each ccd image 1024 x 1024 pixels is about 10 ` * * ` 9 .
the speckle patterns may be used to reconstruct the magnetic domain structure of the sampl@xmath0 ; this is but one of a general class of the old inverse or phase retrieval problem@xmath1 .
the data appears as a series of ccd image files 726axxx.spe ( of increasing photon energy ) that is read into the data processing computer program .
the file numbers can be converted to photon energy since the difference between the two maxima files 122 ( photon energy 779.2 ev . ) and 145 is 15.8 ev .
figure 1 ( left ) shows the magnetic resonance has two peaks .
each piece of data has an image file associated and that file has a 1024 x 1024 matrix containing intensity values ( if plotted in 3d it has the shape of a centered crown ) .
the princeton ccd camera file is read into the freely available matlab data analysis program by the following code fragment : .... % auto - ignore fid = fopen('nameoffile.spe','r ' ) ; header = fread(fid,2050,'uinit16 ' ) ; % half of 4100 bytes immat = fread(fid,1024 * 1024,'uint16 ' ) ; z = reshape(immat,1024,1024 ) ; fclose(fid);z = double(z ) ; [ x , y]=meshgrid(1:1024,1:1024 ) ; mesh(x , y , z ) ; % display 3d plot axis square ; axis tight ; view(90,90 ) ; print -djpeg99 nameoffile.jpg % highest resolution saved % send email evr@u.washington.edu .... figure 1(right ) shows the variation of the intensity in file 122 in the radial direction that has been azimuthally averaged ( consider slicing through the center out past the edge of the crown ) .
the data analysis calculates the radius of each pixel , places it into appropriate bins and finds the average intensity ; since each bin is only one pixel wide the bin number is the radius rounded to integer .
the profile was fitted to a gaussian using non - linear levenberg - marquardt least squares .
the difference between the maximum and minimum calculated values is the height , the distance of the maximum from the origin is called the peak center , and the fwhm ( full width at half maximum ) is called the width .
more about the variation of the height , width and center with filenumber will appear at the end .
the series of files 726axxx.spe are analysed for normalized cross - correlatio@xmath2 using 2d matrices of the image files from which the average pixel values have been subtracted .
the sum of the product of pixel values from two images divided by the square root of the product of the sum of the pixel values squared of each image ( makes it normalized ) is gamma ( normalized cross - correlation ) of the two images .
if gamma is 1 they are correlated , if zero uncorrelated and if -1 anti - correlated .
the normalized cross - correlation function , gamma , is related to the coherence functio@xmath3 .
table 1 shows the values of gamma for four of the files selected as file 117(middle of first peak ) , file 122 ( top of first peak ) , file 133 ( minimum between the two peaks ) and file 145 ( top of second peak ) .
the ccd images were processed so as to remove the burns , remove anomalous charge scattering , remove the blocker arm , centered in the image and the central disk darkened to remove the burns in that area also . the bright spots on the image are fixed burns in the ccd camera that cause a few pixels to be unusable ; these are the ones that appear very bright . at the end of a series of spe image files a ccd burns only image
was taken and a burns and anomalous charge scattering image was taken .
the difference of these two images was used to subract off the anomalous charge scattering pisels from each image file pixels ( provided they are above the minimum background value of the image ) .
after the anomalous charge scattering is removed , the burns ( or hot spots ) are removed .
the hot spots are masked off , and after rotating around the middle of the 1024 x 1024 image , new background replaces the hot spots .
next , the circle of maximum intensity is found by having an imaginary turtle going out from beyond the edge of the blocker disc in rays every 1 degree finding maximum intensity .
the intensities are sorted , the lowest 20 points out of 360 dropped and a least squares fit of the 340 points is done yielding the circle of maximum intensity .
the approximate edges of the blocker arm ( about 7 degrees ) are located by finding those points on the circle of maximum intensity where the second derivative changes sign .
a mask is created , a rotation picks up a patch , and the pixels of the blocker arm are replaced .
missing background is fille in on the edges to make 1024 x 1024 .
all pixels further out from the center , beyond the circle of maximum intensity were used to find the centroid and then the whole pattern was relocated to the center of the image matrix . due to the use of coherent light from synchrotron radiation ,
the scattering patterns produced are highly speckled .
each speckle is the sum of light scattered from all the illuminated magnetic domains .
so small changes in the microscopic orientation of the magnetic domains can have a large effect on the speckle pattern .
the bulk magnetization of cobalt usually is in the x - y plane but when there are only a few cobalt atoms in the layer the magnetication becomes perpendicular to the plane of the layers .
the observed intensity is related to the charge density , polarization , photon energy , magnetization , atomic scattering factor and scattering geometry ; there are terms due to magnetic resonance and electronic structur@xmath4 .
the azimuthal variation of intensity is calculated by looking at the angle from the center for each pixel , classifying it as belonging to bins ( 1 to 360 ) and finding the average of each bin ; this is plotted versus the bin number with each bin being one degree wide . in fig .
2 the difference between the maxima and the lowest minimum is v1 , v2 .
the azimuthal variation of the intensity is described by an equation for magneto - crystalline anisotropy energy that includes a term proportional to the sine of twice the azimuthal angle square@xmath5 .
the amplitude has real and imaginary charge and magnetic anomalous scattering factors which are tensors in the general cas@xmath6 . the right side of fig .
2 pretty much follows the shape of average intensity versus file number in fig .
1(left ) and illustrates the variation of the magnetic anisotropy difference ( maximum minus lowest minimum ) with photon energy(increases with file number ) .
the average of the value of first maximum and second maximum would be a reasonable estimate of the variable .
the reason the magnetic anistropy has these variations is because the atomic factor is a tenso@xmath7 .
the autocorrelation has a maximum at the origin .
you could think of it as the convolution of the complex conjugate of f(-x ,- y ) and f(x , y ) .
if f(x , y ) has a fourier transform f(s , r ) , then its autocorrelation function has the transform absolute value squared of f(s , r ) and has no phase information(wiener - khinchin theorem ) . in the data analysis , the autocorrelation is evaluated by taking the fourier transform of the reverse complex conjugate of the image and the fourier transform of the image , then taking the real part of the inverse fourier transform of the product of these two fourier transforms .
the three dimensional plot of the autocorrelation looks like a mountain with a narrow spike in the middle .
the threshholded ( 25 - 30% ) contours(5 ) in the x - y plane of the different files show more variation and different symmetries .
figure 3(upper left ) file 117 , halfway up the first peak , looks like it has four 2-fold axes .
figure 3(upper right ) file 122 , at the top of the first peak , may have one 4-fold and two 2-fold axes .
figure 3(lower left ) file 133 , the minimum between the peaks , appears to have one 4-fold axis and two 2-fold axes .
figure 3(lower right ) file 145 , top of the second peak , seems to have four 2-fold axes . in fig .
4(top ) , the height of the peak verus file number is plotted and is in agreement with fig .
the correlation length is related to the inverse of the width . in fig .
4(bottom ) , the inverse of the peak center is plotted versus file number ; the spacing of the magnetic domains is inverse to the peak center . in all cases the curves follow fig .
1(left ) more or less ; the last one does nt follow the second peak very well .
it is possible to see azimuthal intensity variation through data anaylsis of ccd images . because of the odd behavior of the second peak and the differences in the autocorrelation functions(reflecting differences in electronic configurations ) of the first and second peaks , there appears to be a difference in the nature of the first and second peaks
. 0 t. o. mentes , c. sanchez - hanke and c. c. kao , _
* 9 * , 90 ( 2002 ) .
f. yakhou , a. letoublon , f. livet , m. de boissieu and f. bley , _ j. magn
. magn . mater _ * 233 * , 119 ( 2001 ) .
a. rahmim , m.sc .
thesis , univ . of british columbia ,
vancouver , 2001 . | magnetic thin film multilayer systems magnetic properties application for recording technologies samples grown on low - stress 160 nm thick sinx membranes by magnetron sputtering 20 nm thick pt buffer layers 3 nm thick pt caps between samples had 50 repeating units of 0.4 nm thick cobalt layer 0.7 nm thick pt layer experiments used linearly polarized x rays from lawrence berkeley laboratory thirteenth harmonic beamline 9 undulator gap 54 mm near resonant cobalt edge undulator beam passed through 35 micron pinhole before scattered by sample distance sample to ccd 118 cm resonant magnetic scattering collected by princeton soft x - ray ccd camera 1024 x 1024 pixels one inch by inch intensity raw undulator beam 2 x 14 photons / sec coherent beam 12 scattered beam 7 photons / sec each speckle pattern measured for 30 to 100 seconds total photons in each ccd image 1024 pixels about 10 speckle patterns reconstruct magnetic domain structure data appears as ccd image files increasing photon energy read into data processing computer programfile numbers converted to photon energy difference between files 122 779.2 and 145 15.8 ev figure 1 shows magnetic resonance two peaks each data image file 1024 x 1024 matrix intensity values 3d centered crown princeton ccd camera file read into matlab data analysis by code fragment auto - ignore fid = fopen( header = fread(fid half of 4100 bytes immat = fread z = reshape(immat fclose(fid);z = double(z x y=meshgrid(1:1024 mesh display 3d plot axis square tight view(90 ) print -djpeg99 nameoffile.jpg highest resolution saved send email evr@u.washington.edu figure 1 shows variation intensity in file 122 radial direction azimuthally averaged data analysis calculates radius each pixel bins finds average intensity bin one pixel bin number radius rounded to integer profile fitted to gaussian using non - linear levenberg - marquardt least squares difference between maximum minimum values is height distance from origin peak center width more about variation of height width center with filenumber end series of files 726axxx.spe analysed for normalized cross - correlatio@xmath2 using 2d matrices image files average pixel values subtracted sum of product pixel values from two images divided by square root is gamma ( cross - correlation ) images if gamma 1 correlated zero uncorrelated if -1 anti - correlated normalized cross - correlation function gamma related to coherence functio@xmath3 table 1 shows values gamma for four files file 117 122 133 145 ccd images processed remove burns anomalous charge scattering blocker arm central disk darkened remove burns bright spots image are fixed burns cause pixels unusable end of series spe image files ccd burns only image taken and burns and anomalous charge scattering image taken difference of images used to subract anomalous charge scattering pisels from image file above minimum background value after anomalous charge scattering removed burns or hot spots ) removed hot spots masked after new background replaces hot spots circle of maximum intensity found by imaginary turtle going out from beyond edge blocker disc rays every 1 degree finding maximum intensityintensities sorted lowest 20 points 360 dropped least squares fit 340 circle maximum intensity edges blocker arm 7 degrees located points circle where second derivative changes mask created rotation picks patch pixels replaced missing background edges 1024 x 1024 pixels from center beyond circle intensity used find centroid pattern relocated to center image coherent light synchrotron radiation scattering patterns highly speckled each speckle sum light scattered from illuminated magnetic domains small changes in orientation speckle pattern bulk magnetization of cobalt in x - y plane few cobalt atoms perpendicular to plane observed intensity related to charge density polarization photon energy magnetization atomic scattering factor scattering geometry due magnetic resonance electronic structur azimuthal variation intensity calculated angle from center each pixel bins 1 to 360 ) average each bin plotted versus bin number each bin one degree wide fig 2 difference between maxima lowest minimum is v1 , v2 azimuthal variation described by equation for magneto - crystalline anisotropy energy term proportional to sine of twice azimuthal angleamplitude has real imaginary charge magnetic scattering factors tensors right side fig . 2 follows average intensity versus file number 1 illustrates variation magnetic anisotropy difference maximum lowest with photon energy(increases with file number average first second maximum reasonable estimate variable magnetic anistropy variations atomic factor tenso autocorrelation has maximum at origin convolution of complex conjugate f(-x y ) f(x , y ) if f(x , y ) has fourier transform f(s , r ) autocorrelation function has transform absolute value squared of f(s , r ) no phase information(wiener - khinchin theorem data analysis autocorrelation evaluated by fourier transform conjugate real part inverse fourier transform product three dimensional plot autocorrelation like mountain with narrow spike middle threshholded ( 25 - 30% ) contours(5 in x - y plane show more variation figure 3 file 117 first peak four 2-fold axes file 122 first peak one 4-fold two 2-fold axes file 133 minimum peaks one 4-fold two 2-fold axes file 145 second peak four 2-fold axes4(top ) height peak file number agreement fig . correlation length related inverse width fig. 4(bottom inverse peak center versus file number spacing magnetic domains inverse peak center curves follow fig . 1(left ) last follow second peak azimuthal intensity variation data anaylsis ccd images odd behavior second peak differences autocorrelation functions first second peaks difference nature peaks t o. mentes c. sanchez - hanke kao * 9 * , 90 ( 2002 ) f. yakhou. letoublon f. livet m. de boissieu f. bley magn 233 * , 119 ( 2001 ) a. m.sc thesis univ . british columbia vancouver 2001 | 0.359336 | 2,515 | 1,246 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,495 | maximum likelihood fits to data can be done using binned data ( histograms ) and unbinned data . with binned data
, one gets not only the fitted parameters but also a measure of the goodness of fit . with unbinned data ,
currently , the fitted parameters are obtained but no measure of goodness of fit is available .
this remains , to date , an unsolved problem in statistics .
using bayes theorem and likelihood ratios , we provide a method by which both the fitted quantities and a measure of the goodness of fit are obtained for unbinned likelihood fits , as well as errors in the fitted quantities .
the quantity , conventionally interpreted as a bayesian prior , is seen in this scheme to be a number not a distribution , that is determined from data . | as of the durham conference @xcite , the problem of obtaining a goodness of fit in unbinned likelihood fits was an unsolved one . in what follows , we will denote by the vector @xmath0 , the theoretical parameters ( @xmath0 for `` signal '' ) and the vector @xmath1 , the experimentally measured quantities or `` configurations '' . for simplicity
, we will illustrate the method where both @xmath0 and @xmath1 are one dimensional , though either or both can be multi - dimensional in practice .
we thus define the theoretical model by the conditional probability density @xmath2
. then an unbinned maximum likelihood fit to data is obtained by maximizing the likelihood @xcite , @xmath3 where the likelihood is evaluated at the @xmath4 observed data points @xmath5 .
such a fit will determine the maximum likelihood value @xmath6 of the theoretical parameters , but will not tell us how good the fit is .
the value of the likelihood @xmath7 at the maximum likelihood point does not furnish a goodness of fit , since the likelihood is not invariant under change of variable .
this can be seen by observing that one can transform the variable set @xmath1 to a variable set @xmath8 such that @xmath9 is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1 .
such a transformation is known as a hypercube transformation , in multi - dimensions .
other datasets will yield different values of likelihood in the variable space @xmath1 when the likelihood is computed with the original function @xmath10 .
however , in the original hypercube space , the value of the likelihood is unity regardless of the dataset @xmath11 , thus the likelihood @xmath7 can not furnish a goodness of fit by itself , since neither the likelihood , nor ratios of likelihoods computed using the same distribution @xmath10 is invariant under variable transformations .
the fundamental reason for this non - invariance is that only a single distribution , namely , @xmath10 is being used to compute the goodness of fit .
in binned likelihood cases , where one is comparing a theoretical distribution @xmath2 with a binned histogram , there are two distributions involved , the theoretical distribution and the data distribution .
the @xmath12 of the data is approximated by the bin contents of the histogram normalized to unity .
if the data consists of @xmath4 events , the @xmath12 of the data @xmath13 is defined in the frequentist sense as the normalized density distribution in @xmath1 space of @xmath4 events as @xmath14 . in the binned case
, we can bin in finer and finer bins as @xmath14 and obtain a smooth function , which we define as the @xmath12 of the data @xmath13 . in practice
, one is always limited by statistics and the binned function will be an approximation to the true @xmath12 .
we can now define a likelihood ratio @xmath15 such that @xmath16 where we have used the notation @xmath17 to denote the event set @xmath5 .
let us now note that @xmath18 is invariant under the variable transformation @xmath19 , since @xmath20 and the jacobian of the transformation @xmath21 cancels in the numerator and denominator in the ratio .
this is an extremely important property of the likelihood ratio @xmath18 that qualifies it to be a goodness of fit variable .
since the denominator @xmath22 is independent of the theoretical parameters @xmath0 , both the likelihood ratio and the likelihood maximize at the same point @xmath6 .
one can also show @xcite that the maximum value of the likelihood ratio occurs when the theoretical likelihood @xmath23 and the data likelihood @xmath24 are equal for all @xmath25 .
in the case where the @xmath12 @xmath13 is estimated by binned histograms and the statistics are gaussian , it is readily shown @xcite that the commonly used goodness of fit variable @xmath26 .
it is worth emphasizing that the likelihood ratio as defined above is needed and not just the negative log of theoretical likelihood @xmath27 to derive this result .
the popular conception that @xmath28 is -2 log @xmath27 is simply incorrect!. it can also be shown that the likelihood ratio defined above can describe the binned cases where the statistics are poissonian @xcite . in order to solve our problem of goodness of fit in unbinned likelihood cases
, one needs to arrive at a method of estimating the data @xmath12 @xmath13 without the use of bins .
one of the better known methods of estimating the probability density of a distribution in an unbinned case is by the use of probability density estimators @xmath29 , also known as kernel density estimators @xcite @xmath30 .
the @xmath12 @xmath13 is approximated by @xmath31 where a kernel function @xmath32 is centered around each data point @xmath25 , is so defined that it normalizes to unity and for large @xmath4 approaches a dirac delta function @xcite .
the choice of the kernel function can vary depending on the problem .
a popular kernel is the gaussian defined in the multi - dimensional case as @xmath33 where @xmath34 is the error matrix of the data defined as @xmath35 and the @xmath36 implies average over the @xmath4 events , and @xmath37 is the number of dimensions .
the hessian matrix @xmath38 is defined as the inverse of @xmath34 and the repeated indices imply summing over .
the parameter @xmath39 is a `` smoothing parameter '' , which has@xcite a suggested optimal value @xmath40 , that satisfies the asymptotic condition @xmath41 the parameter @xmath39 will depend on the local number density and will have to be adjusted as a function of the local density to obtain good representation of the data by the @xmath42 .
our proposal for the goodness of fit in unbinned likelihood fits is thus the likelihood ratio @xmath43 evaluated at the maximum likelihood point @xmath6 .
we consider a simple one - dimensional case where the data is an exponential distribution , say decay times of a radioactive isotope .
the theoretical prediction is given by @xmath44 we have chosen an exponential with @xmath45 for this example . the gaussian kernel for the @xmath42
would be given by @xmath46 where the variance @xmath47 of the exponential is numerically equal to @xmath0 . to begin with
, we chose a constant value for the smoothing parameter , which for 1000 events generated is calculated to be 0.125 . figure [ genev ] shows the generated events , the theoretical curve @xmath2 and the @xmath42 curve @xmath48 normalized to the number of events .
the @xmath42 fails to reproduce the data near the origin due to the boundary effect , whereby the gaussian probabilities for events close to the origin spill over to negative values of @xmath1 .
this lost probability would be compensated by events on the exponential distribution with negative @xmath1 if they existed . in our case , this presents a drawback for the @xmath42 method , which we will remedy later in the paper using @xmath42 definitions on the hypercube and periodic boundary conditions . for the time being , we will confine our example to values of @xmath49 to avoid the boundary effect . in order to test the goodness of fit capabilities of the likelihood ratio @xmath18
, we superimpose a gaussian on the exponential and try and fit the data by a simple exponential . and the @xmath42 estimator ( solid ) histogram with no errors . [ genev],width=245 ]
figure [ genev1 ] shows the `` data '' with 1000 events generated as an exponential in the fiducial range @xmath50 .
superimposed on it is a gaussian of 500 events .
more events in the exponential are generated in the interval @xmath51 to avoid the boundary effect at the fiducial boundary at c=1.0 .
since the number density varies significantly , we have had to introduce a method of iteratively determining the smoothing factor as a function of @xmath1 as described in @xcite . with this modification in the @xmath42 ,
one gets a good description of the behavior of the data by the @xmath42 as shown in figure [ genev1 ]
. generated as an exponential with decay constant @xmath0=1.0 with a superimposed gaussian of 500 events centered at @xmath1=2.0 and width=0.2 .
the @xmath42 estimator is the ( solid ) histogram with no errors .
[ genev1],width=245 ] we now vary the number of events in the gaussian and obtain the value of the negative log likelihood ratio @xmath52 as a function of the strength of the gaussian .
table [ tab1 ] summarizes the results .
the number of standard deviations the unbinned likelihood fit is from what is expected is determined empirically by plotting the value of @xmath52 for a large number of fits where no gaussian is superimposed ( i.e. the null hypothesis ) and determining the mean and @xmath53 of this distribution and using these to estimate the number of @xmath47 s the observed @xmath52 is from the null case .
table [ tab1 ] also gives the results of a binned fit on the same `` data '' .
it can be seen that the unbinned fit gives a @xmath54 discrimination when the number of gaussian events is 85 , where as the binned fit gives a @xmath55 of 42/39 for the same case .
we intend to make these tests more sophisticated in future work . .
goodness of fit results from unbinned likelihood and binned likelihood fits for various data samples .
the negative values for the number of standard deviations in some of the examples is due to statistical fluctuation .
[ tab1 ] [ cols="^,^,^,^ " , ]
equation [ pns ] can be used to show that the expectation value of @xmath56 of the parameter @xmath0 is given by @xmath57 where @xmath58 is the average of @xmath0 for individual experiments .
equation [ sbar ] states @xmath56 is the weighted average of @xmath58 obtained from individual measurements , the weight for each experiment being the `` data likelihood '' @xmath59 for that experiment . in the absence of experimental bias , @xmath56 would be identical to the true value @xmath60 .
it remains to be shown that the weighted average of maximum likelihood values @xmath6 from indiviual experiments also converge to the maximum likelihood point of @xmath61 .
also one needs to develop an analytic theory of the goodness of fit for unbinned likelihood fits .
finally , one needs to investigate a bit more closely the transformation properties of @xmath61 under change of variable .
to conclude , we have proposed a scheme for obtaining the goodness of fit in unbinned likelihood fits .
this scheme involves the usage of two @xmath12 s , namely data and theory . in the process of computing the fitted errors , we have demonstrated that the quantity in the joint probability equations that has been interpreted as the `` bayesian prior '' is in reality a number and not a distribution .
this number is the value of the @xmath12 of the parameter , which we call the `` unknown concomitant '' at the true value of the parameter .
this number is calculated from a combination of data and theory and is seen to be an irrelevant parameter .
if this viewpoint is accepted , the controversial practice of guessing distributions for the `` bayesian prior '' can now be abandoned , as can be the terms `` bayesian '' and `` frequentist '' .
we show how to use the posterior density to rigorously calculate fitted errors .
9 k. kinoshita , `` evaluating quality of fit in unbinned maximum likelihood fitting '' , proceedings of the conference on advanced statistical techniques in particle physics , durham , march 2002 ippp/02/39 , dcpt/02/78 .
+ b. yabsley,``statistical practice at the belle experiment , and some questions'',ibid .
r. d. cousins,``conference summary '' , ibid .
r. a. fisher,``on the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics '' , _ philos .
london ser .
a _ * 222 * , 309 - 368(1922 ) ; + r. a. fisher,``theory of statistical estimation '' , _ proc . cambridge philos .
* 22 * , 700 - 725 ( 1925 ) . ``
a measure of the goodness of fit in unbinned likelihood fits '' , r .raja , long write - up , + http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/phystat2003/talks + /raja
/ raja_bayes_maxlike.pdf `` end of bayesianism ? '' , r.raja , http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/phystat2003/talks/raja/raja-end_bayesianism.pdf e. parzen , `` on estimation of a probability density function and mode '' _ ann.math.statis . _ * 32 * , 1065 - 1072 ( 1962 ) .
d. scott .
_ multivariate density estimation_. john wiley & sons , 1992 .
+ m. wand and m. jones , _ kernel smoothing_. chapman & hall , 1995 . | durham conference @xcite problem obtaining goodness fit in unbinned likelihood fits unsolved denote vector @xmath0 theoretical parameters signal @xmath1 experimentally measured quantities configurations illustrate method @xmath0 @xmath1 one dimensional multi - define theoretical model by conditional probability density @xmath2 unbinned maximum likelihood fit data obtained maximizing likelihood @xcite @xmath3 evaluated @xmath4 observed data points @xmath5 fit maximum likelihood value @xmath6 theoretical parameters good fit value likelihood @xmath7 at maximum likelihood point furnish goodness of fit not invariant under change variable transform variable set @xmath1 to @xmath8 @xmath9 uniformly distributed between 0 and 1 transformation hypercube transformation other datasets yield different values likelihood variable space @xmath1 computed with original function @xmath10 original hypercube space value likelihood unity regardless dataset @xmath11 likelihood @xmath7 furnish goodness of fit neither likelihood ratios likelihoods computed same distribution @xmath10 invariant under variable transformationsnon - invariance single distribution @xmath10 goodness of fit binned likelihood cases comparing theoretical distribution @xmath2 with binned histogram two distributions theoretical data distribution @xmath12 data approximated by bin contents histogram normalized to unity if data @xmath4 events @xmath12 @xmath13 defined as normalized density distribution in @xmath1 space @xmath4 events @xmath14 binned case bin finer bins as @xmath14 obtain smooth function as @xmath12 of data @xmath13 limited by statistics binned function approximation to true @xmath12 define likelihood ratio @xmath15 @xmath16 notation @xmath17 event set @xmath5 @xmath18 invariant under variable transformation @xmath19 @xmath21 cancels numerator denominator ratio important property ratio @xmath18 goodness of fit variable denominator @xmath22 independent of theoretical parameters @xmath0 likelihood ratio maximize same point @xmath6 maximum value likelihood ratio when theoretical likelihood @xmath23 and data likelihood @xmath24 equal for @xmath25@xmath12 @xmath13 estimated by binned histograms statistics gaussian shown goodness of fit variable @xmath26 likelihood ratio defined needed not negative log theoretical likelihood @xmath27 result @xmath28 is -2 log @xmath27 incorrect likelihood ratio binned cases statistics poissonian solve problem goodness of fit in unbinned likelihood cases estimating data @xmath12 @xmath13 without bins estimating probability density unbinned probability density estimators @xmath29 kernel density estimators @xmath30 @xmath12 @xmath13 approximated by @xmath31 kernel function @xmath32 centered around each data point @xmath25 normalizes to unity large @xmath4 approaches dirac delta function kernel function vary problem popular kernel gaussian multi - dimensional @xmath33 @xmath34 error matrix of data @xmath35 @xmath36 average over @xmath4 events @xmath37 number of dimensions hessian matrix @xmath38 inverse of @xmath34 repeated indices imply summing overparameter @xmath39 smoothing parameter suggested optimal value @xmath40 satisfies asymptotic condition @xmath41 on local number density adjusted good representation data @xmath42 proposal for likelihood fits likelihood ratio @xmath43 at maximum likelihood point @xmath6 one - dimensional case data exponential distribution decay times of radioactive isotope theoretical prediction by @xmath44 chosen exponential with @xmath45 gaussian kernel for @xmath42 by @xmath46 variance @xmath47 equal to @xmath0 chose constant value for smoothing parameter for 1000 events 0.125 figure shows generated events theoretical curve @xmath2 @xmath42 curve @xmath48 normalized to number events @xmath42 fails to reproduce data near origin due boundary effect gaussian probabilities events spill over to negative values @xmath1 lost probability compensated by events negative @xmath1 drawback for @xmath42 method remedy using @xmath42 definitions hypercube periodic boundary conditions confine example to values @xmath49 to avoid boundary effecttest fit capabilities likelihood ratio @xmath18 superimpose gaussian on exponential fit data simple exponential @xmath42 estimator solid histogram no errors figure shows data 1000 events exponential fiducial range @xmath50 superimposed gaussian 500 events more events interval @xmath51 avoid boundary effect fiducial boundary c=1.0 number density varies method iteratively determining smoothing factor function @xmath1 modification in @xmath42 description behavior data figure generated exponential decay constant @xmath0=1.0 superimposed gaussian 500 events centered at @xmath1=2.0 width=0.2 @xmath42 estimator solid histogram no errors vary number of events in gaussian obtain value negative log likelihood ratio @xmath52 function of strength gaussian table tab1 ] summarizes results number standard deviations unbinned likelihood fit from expected determined plotting value @xmath52 for large number fits no gaussian superimposed null hypothesis determining mean @xmath53 distribution estimate number @xmath47 s observed @xmath52 from null case table tab1 gives results of binned fit on same dataunbinned fit gives @xmath54 discrimination when gaussian events 85 binned fit gives @xmath55 of 42/39 same case intend to make tests sophisticated future goodness of fit results from unbinned binned likelihood fits for data samples negative standard deviations due to statistical fluctuation equation expectation value of @xmath56 parameter @xmath0 given by @xmath57 @xmath58 average of @xmath0 for experiments equation states @xmath56 is weighted average of @xmath58 from measurements weight data likelihood @xmath59 experimental bias @xmath56 identical to true value @xmath60 weighted average of maximum likelihood values @xmath6 converge to maximum likelihood @xmath61 develop analytic theory of goodness of fit for unbinned likelihood fits investigate transformation properties of @xmath61 under change of variable proposed scheme for obtaining goodness of fit in unbinned likelihood fits involves two data and theory fitted errors demonstrated quantity in joint probability equations as bayesian prior is number not distributionnumber value @xmath12 parameter unknown concomitant true value calculated from data theory irrelevant if viewpoint accepted controversial practice guessing distributions bayesian prior abandoned terms bayesian frequentist posterior density calculate fitted errors k. kinoshita evaluating quality fit unbinned maximum likelihood fitting proceedings conference advanced statistical techniques particle durham march 2002 ippp/02/39 dcpt/02/78 b. yabsley,``statistical practice belle experiment r. d. cousins,``conference summary r. a. fisher mathematical foundations theoretical statistics philos . london ser 222, 309 - 368(1922 ) r. a. fisher,``theory statistical estimation cambridge philos 22, 700 - 725 ( 1925 ) measure goodness fit unbinned likelihood fits r.raja http://www-conf.slac.stanford/phystat2003/talks_bayes_maxlike.pdf end of bayesianism.raja_bayesianism. parzen estimation probability density function mode ann.math.statis 32 *, 1065 - 1072 ( 1962 ) d. scott multivariate density estimation john wiley sons 1992 jones kernel smoothing chapman hall 1995 | 0.494624 | 2,935 | 1,518 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,540 | the energy dependence of such characteristics as a ratio of the total number of charged particles to the total flux of eas cherenkov radiation , a ratio of @xmath0 gev muon flux density at the distance of @xmath1 m from a shower core to charged particle flux density , a ratio of the energy transferred to the electromagnetic component of eas to the primary particle energy is presented .
their comparison with two - component mass composition of cosmic rays ( p - fe ) in the framework of calculations by a qgsjet model is given . | the irregularities in the cosmic ray ( cr ) energy spectrum of `` knee '' type at @xmath2 ev and `` ankle '' type at @xmath3 ev found in @xcite are yet of special interest from the point of view of interpretation of these phenomena from the position of astrophysics . in recent years
a few papers @xcite have been published which try to explain such a behavior of cr spectrum with the help of new models of generation and propagation of crs .
there exists also another namely a nuclear - physical point of view for the formation of irregularity at @xmath4 ev @xcite . in some sense , the answer to the problem on reasons of the formation of breaks is in the detailed study of different eas characteristics in the region of the first and second irregularities in the spectrum .
we have made such a work in @xcite .
the cascade curves of eas development in fig.[fig2 ] were reconstructed according to the method suggested in @xcite .
it is seen from fig.[fig2 ] that the maximum depth of cascade curves depends on the primary particle mass composition as well as the hadron interaction model .
it is seen from fig.[fig2 ] that to describe the experimental cascade curve ( @xmath5 , @xmath6 ) the qgsjet model is better - suited @xcite .
so we use this model for the estimation of mass composition of primary particles .
fig.[fig3 ] presents the calculations of the maximum depth @xmath5 using the qgsjet model for the primary proton and iron nucleus , and experimental data obtained at the yakutsk eas array .
it is seen that the velocity of shift of @xmath5 to sea level depends on the energy range . in the framework of the qgsjet model
the experimental data are indicative of the change of mass composition of primary particles in the energy range @xmath7 ev and at @xmath8 ev .
ev ) with different models of hadron interactions.,scaledwidth=42.0% ] fig.[fig3 ] and fig.[fig4 ] present experimental data : a ) the density of muons with @xmath9 gev at a distance of 1000 m from the shower core @xcite , b ) the root - mean - square radius @xmath10 of charged particle ( ldf ) @xcite .
these data are compared with calculations using the qgsjet model .
protons , iron nuclei and @xmath11-quanta are considered as primary particles . a confidence interval taken in calculations is @xmath12 . from fig.3
it follows that in the energy range @xmath13 ev within the boundaries of confidence there are @xmath14% of showers for the iron nucleus and @xmath15% for the proton . at @xmath16
ev the portion of iron nuclei decreases , the per cent of protons and @xmath11-quanta increases .
it is seen from fig.[fig4 ] that the `` heaviest '' mass composition is observed at @xmath17 ev . vs @xmath18 relations for observed events @xmath19 ev ( squares ) , @xmath20 ev ( points ) and @xmath21 ev ( triangles ) . expected @xmath12 bounds for the distributions are indicated for p , fe and @xmath11 primary by different curve as in the legend.,scaledwidth=42.0% ] the most sensitive instrument for the model of hadron interactions and mass composition of primary particles is the eas muon component . at the yakutsk complex eas array
the muons with @xmath0 gev are measured by a shower registration in 70% cases .
fig.[fig5 ] presents the correlation of @xmath22 parameters and fig.[fig6 ] gives the portion of muons ( ratio of muons to all charged particles ) at a distance of 300 m and 600 m from the shower core . in the same place
the calculations by the qgsjet model are given .
the tendency for an increase of light nuclei in the cosmic ray primary flux at @xmath23 ev is marked by these data . and
muons @xmath24 at sea level .
the curves are a calculation by the qgsjet model for the primary proton and iron nuclei.,scaledwidth=42.0% ] gev ( % ) . @xmath25 and @xmath26.,scaledwidth=42.0% ] at the yakutsk complex eas array
the shower energy is determined by measurements of the total flux of eas cherenkov light @xmath27 , the total number of charged particles , @xmath28 , and muons , @xmath24 , at sea level @xcite .
fig.[fig7 ] presents the energy - dependence of @xmath29 ratio .
it is seen from calculations that the ratio strongly depends on a mass composition . from comparison of the calculations by the qgsjet model for the proton , iron nucleus and experimental data
it follows that the mass composition changes just after the first knee in the spectrum , i.e. in the interval @xmath30 ev .
it is evident from fig.[fig8 ] where the portion of energy transmitted in to the electromagnetic eas cascade is shown . on a primary energy.,scaledwidth=42.0% ] in this section we consider the fluctuations of @xmath5 and @xmath10 obtained by the measurement of cherenkov eas light and density of charged particle flux ( see fig.[fig9 ] and fig.[fig10 ] ) . in both cases at @xmath31
ev fluctuations are considerable and correspond to the mixed mass composition of primary particles . from comparison with calculations by the qgsjet model we have the following relationship
: the light nuclei are @xmath32% and heavy nuclei are @xmath33% ( see the dotted line in fig.[fig9 ] ) . at @xmath34
ev.,scaledwidth=42.0% ] at @xmath31 ev .
curves are the qgsjet model calculations for the primary proton and iron nucleus.,scaledwidth=42.0% ]
at the yakutsk complex array for almost the 35-year period of continuous observations the unique experimental data on electron , muon and cherenkov eas components in the region of superhigh and ultrahigh energies have been accumulated .
results on longitudinal and radial development of eas are presented in figures . from the total combination of data
one can select two energy regions where , as is seen from figures , the characteristics of eas have the complex dependence on the energy .
this is the energy ranges @xmath35 ev and @xmath19 ev . as is known , in these energy ranges the irregularities of `` knee '' and `` ankle '' in the energy spectrum of eas are observed . from the comparison of all experimental data with calculations by the qgsjet model in @xcite
the results of the cosmic ray mass composition in the energy range @xmath36 ev have been obtained .
it follows from the analysis that after the `` knee '' the mass composition becomes heavier and in the region of `` ankle '' , on the contrary , becomes lighter .
such a conclusion does nt contradict the hypothesis on a cosmic ray generation up to the energy @xmath37 ev in our galaxy and their propagation according to the model of anomalous diffusion in the fractal interstellar medium . beginning with @xmath38 ev
the mass composition becomes lighter and it does nt contradict the presence of cosmic rays metagalactic origin in the total flux of cosmic rays . | irregularities in cosmic ray cr ) energy spectrum knee @xmath2 ev and ankle @xmath3 ev in @xcite special interest interpretation astrophysics papers @xcite published explain behavior cr spectrum with new models generation propagation nuclear - physical point of view for formation irregularity at @xmath4 ev @xcite answer to formation breaks in detailed study of eas characteristics in first second irregularities work in @xcite cascade curves of eas development in reconstructed method @xcite maximum depth depends on primary particle mass composition hadron interaction model experimental cascade curve qgsjet model better - suited @xcite for estimation of mass composition of primary particles fig. ] calculations of maximum depth @xmath5 using qgsjet model for primary proton iron nucleus experimental data at yakutsk eas array velocity of shift of @xmath5 to sea level depends on energy range qgsjet model experimental data indicative of change of mass composition of primary particles in energy range @xmath7 ev @xmath8 ev with different models hadron interactions fig.[fig4 experimental data density of muons with @xmath9 gev 1000 m from shower core @xcite root - mean - square radius @xmath10 of charged particle ldf ) @xcite compared with qgsjet model protons iron nuclei @xmath11-quanta primary particles confidence interval @xmath12 fig.3 energy range @xmath13 ev @xmath14% showers for iron nucleus proton at @xmath16 ev iron nuclei decreases protons-quanta increases heaviest mass composition at @xmath17 ev relations @xmath19 ev squares points ev triangles @xmath12 bounds distributions for p fe @xmath11 primary sensitive instrument for hadron interactions mass composition eas muon component yakutsk complex eas array muons with @xmath0 gev measured by shower registration in 70% cases fig. correlation of @xmath22 parameters portion of muons charged particles at 300 m 600 m from shower core calculations qgsjet model increase of light nuclei in cosmic ray primary flux at @xmath23 ev muons @xmath24 at sea levelcurves calculation qgsjet model primary proton iron nuclei,scaledwidth=42.0% @xmath25 @xmath26% yakutsk complex eas array shower energy determined by total flux eas cherenkov light @xmath27 total number charged particles @xmath28 muons @xmath24 at sea level @xcite.[fig7 ] presents energy - @xmath29 ratio ratio depends on mass composition comparison experimental data mass composition changes after first knee spectrum interval @xmath30 ev fig.[fig8 ] portion energy transmitted electromagnetic eas cascade shown primary energy% fluctuations @xmath5 @xmath10 measurement cherenkov eas light density charged particle flux fig.[fig9 fig[fig10 ] @xmath31 ev fluctuations considerable correspond mixed mass composition primary particles comparison qgsjet model relationship light nuclei @xmath32% heavy nuclei @xmath33% fig.[fig9 ] @xmath34 ev% @xmath31 ev curves qgsjet model calculations primary proton iron nucleus,scaledwidth=42.0% yakutsk complex array 35-year observations unique data on electron muon cherenkov eas components superhigh ultrahigh energies accumulated results longitudinal radial development eas presented in figures two energy regions characteristics eas dependence on energy energy ranges @xmath35 ev @xmath19 ev irregularities of `` knee ankle '' in energy spectrum eas observed comparison data with qgsjet model @xcite results cosmic ray mass composition in energy range @xmath36 ev obtained after `` knee '' mass composition heavier `` ankle '' lighter contradict hypothesis cosmic ray generation up to @xmath37 ev galaxy propagation model anomalous diffusion fractal interstellar medium beginning with @xmath38 ev mass composition lighter contradict cosmic rays metagalactic origin total flux rays | 0.264035 | 1,607 | 796 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,542 | we study theoretically light propagations at the zigzag edge of a honeycomb photonic crystal consisting of dielectric rods in air , analogous to graphene . within the photonic band gap of the honeycomb photonic crystal ,
a unimodal edge state may exist with a sharp confinement of optical fields .
its dispersion can be tuned simply by adjusting the radius of the edge rods . for the edge rods with a graded variation in radius along the edge direction ,
we show numerically that light beams of different frequencies can be trapped sharply in different spatial locations , rendering wideband trapping of light .
graphene , a flat monolayer of graphite with carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice , has many interesting physical properties with great promise in nanoelectronics owing to its unique electronic properties , e.g. , conical dispersion ( dirac cones ) in the electronic band structure @xcite .
inspired by graphene , its photonic analog , namely , two - dimensional photonic crystals @xcite that possess dirac cones in photonic band structures , have drawn considerable attention in recent years @xcite . the existence of dirac cones may lead to many interesting optical phenomena such as conical diffraction and gap solitons @xcite , pseudodiffusive transport of light @xcite , zitterbewegung of photons @xcite and the realization of zero - refractive - index materials @xcite .
wideband trapping of light , also called `` rainbow '' trapping , is an optical phenomenon that light of different frequencies can be slowed down and stopped at different spatial positions in specially designed waveguides @xcite .
it has many potential applications ranging from optical information storage to enhanced light - matter interactions @xcite .
several structures for realizing wideband trapping have been proposed , including metamaterial waveguides @xcite , plasmonic waveguides @xcite , metal - coated optical nano waveguides @xcite and plasmonic gratings @xcite .
however , these structures may suffer inevitably a serious problem of optical loss due to constituting metals , which are rather lossy especially in the visible regime .
in contrast , dielectric photonic crystal waveguides can also slow light with a very small loss @xcite , which could be exploited in light trapping @xcite .
but they are usually multimodal @xcite , which may lead to undesirable mode coupling . by breaking the inversion symmetry of photonic crystals that possess dirac cones , a photonic band gap ( pbg ) around dirac points
may open up @xcite . with
the presence of edges , edge states within the pbg may appear with a sharp confinement of optical fields at the edges @xcite . with further breaking the time - reversal symmetry , confined edge states become even unidirectional , showing robustness against scattering or disorder @xcite . in this paper , we show theoretically that edge states in honeycomb photonic crystals ( hpcs ) can be exploited in realizing wideband trapping of light .
since no metal is introduced , the optical loss should be much lower than those in metamaterial and plasmonic waveguides .
compared with photonic crystal waveguides , our system is unimodal and more compact as well .
although exemplified by hpcs with rods being infinitely long , our idea can be applied to two - dimensional photonic crystals with finite rod lengths or membrane photonic crystals with drilled holes @xcite . , @xmath0 and @xmath1 representing points of high symmetry .
( c ) photonic band structures of hpcs .
red lines are those for @xmath2 , while blue lines for @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
the colored area stands for the pbg of the latter hpc .
( d ) pbg ( colored area ) map as a function of @xmath5 for fixed @xmath3 .
frequency is in units of @xmath6 , where @xmath7 is the lattice constant and @xmath8 is the wavelength in vacuum.,width=377 ] hpcs under study consist of dielectric rods which are arranged in a honeycomb lattice in air , analogous to graphene , as schematically shown in figure [ fig1](a ) .
the inter - distance between adjacent rods is denoted by @xmath9 . in an infinite hpc
, there are two different sets of rods whose radii are denoted respectively by @xmath10 and @xmath5 .
the radius of edge rods , which are changeable , is denoted by @xmath11 .
the lattice constant of an hpc is thus @xmath12 . without loss of generality ,
the dielectric constant of all rods is taken to be 11.4 , a typical value for silicon at telecommunication wavelengths . in our following discussions , we only consider the transverse magnetic polarization , i.e. , the case that the electric field is parallel to the rods . in figure [ fig1](c ) , photonic band structures of infinite hpcs , calculated by a plane - wave expansion method @xcite , are shown .
for an hpc possessing the inversion symmetry , i.e. , @xmath13 , dirac points exist where the first and second photonic bands cross each other at the @xmath1 point with a reduced frequency of @xmath14 . with broken inversion symmetry , i.e. , @xmath15
, the degeneracy at the @xmath1 point will be lifted and a pbg will open up @xcite .
the lower ( upper ) edge of the pbg is defined by the first ( second ) photonic band at the @xmath1 ( @xmath0 ) point . to attain an hpc with an optimal or desired pbg
, one can tune the radius of the rods or adjust the dielectric constant of the rods . in figure [ fig1](d ) , the pbg map as a function of @xmath5 for fixed @xmath3 is shown . for @xmath2 , there is no pbg due to the existence of the dirac points .
for @xmath15 , a pbg always exists . for @xmath3 and @xmath4 ,
the pbg ranges in reduced frequency @xmath6 from 0.26 to 0.343 . for @xmath3 and @xmath16 , the relative pbg width , @xmath17 , can be as high as @xmath18 , where @xmath19 is the pbg width and
@xmath20 is the mid - gap frequency .
( a ) , where @xmath21 is the wavevector along the edge direction in units of @xmath22 . the radius parameters for the hpc are @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
gray areas represent projected photonic bands .
gray , blue , and dark gray lines represent the edge states for the edge rods with different radius .
dotted straight lines stand for the light line in vacuum .
inset shows the cutoff frequency ( at @xmath23 ) as a function of @xmath11 .
two doted lines defines the range of the pbg .
( b)(d ) distributions of the electric field intensity @xmath24 for the edge state with @xmath25 at ( b ) @xmath26 , ( c ) @xmath27 , and ( d ) @xmath22 , marked by dots in ( a )
. doted circles stand for the rods.,width=377 ] figure [ fig2](a ) shows the dispersion of edge states of an hpc with a zigzag edge , calculated by the plane - wave expansion method @xcite . in our calculations ,
a supercell with a size of @xmath7 along the edge direction and @xmath28 along the direction perpendicular to the edge direction is used .
periodical boundary conditions are imposed in both directions .
the supercell contains a finite hpc with a thickness of @xmath29 along the direction perpendicular to the edge direction , corresponding to 48 rows of rods including the edge rods .
since the separation of the two zigzag edges are large enough , there is no coupling between the two edges .
the resulting dispersion can thus be considered as that for a single zigzag edge of a semi - infinite hpc .
projected photonic bands are obtained by projecting the bulk photonic band structure over the wavevector along the edge direction , @xmath21 .
in addition to photonic bands , for a given radius of the edge rods @xmath11 , an edge state may appear between the first and second photonic bands .
interestingly , this edge state is unimodal , whose dispersion depends on @xmath11
. even for different values of @xmath11 , the dispersion of the edge state has a similar behaviour : its frequency increases with increasing @xmath21 up to the brillouin zone boundary @xmath23 . at @xmath23 , it takes a zero slope . in other words
, the group velocity decreases with increasing @xmath21 and approaches zero at the brillouin zone boundary .
this interesting feature could be exploited to slow down and even stop light @xcite .
the frequency of an edge state at @xmath23 is dubbed cutoff frequency since the frequencies of the edge state at other wavevectors are always smaller than the cutoff frequency . for different values of @xmath11 ,
the corresponding cutoff frequency is different , showing a monotonic decrease with increasing @xmath11 , as shown in the inset of figure [ fig2](a ) .
note that edge states lie below the light line , implying that they are evanescent waves . in figs .
[ fig2](b)(d ) , the field distributions for the edge state with @xmath25 at different @xmath21 are shown .
obviously , optical fields are confined to the edge rods . for the edge mode at @xmath26 , it is near the first photonic band , leading to some bulk excitations in the vicinity of the edge , which can be clearly seen from figure [ fig2](b ) .
in contrast , for the edge modes away from the photonic bands there are nearly no bulk excitations .
as shown by us @xcite , these edge modes are of subwavelength , similar to surface plasmons bounded at metallic surfaces @xcite .
as aforementioned , an edge state at its cutoff frequency has a zero group velocity and the cutoff frequency decreases monotonically with increasing @xmath11 .
these features can render wideband trapping of light by taking advantage of edge states , provided that the edge rods are designed to have a spatially graded variation in radius .
if the grade is small enough , the graded edge can be considered approximately as a series of small edges , in each of which the edge rods possess a constant radius . as a result , each location seems to have a different cutoff frequency . for a wave propagating along such a graded edge
, its group velocity will be gradually reduced along the edge direction and eventually approach zero in a location where the corresponding cutoff frequency coincide with the frequency of the wave . in other words , the wave will stop around this location . for an hpc with a graded zigzag edge at different reduced frequencies ( a ) 0.276 , ( b ) 0.286 , and ( c ) 0.297 .
the radius parameters for the hpc are @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
a right - propagating gaussian beam of different frequencies is launched at @xmath30 .
circles denote dielectric rods .
the bottom ( top ) horizontal axis indicates the position ( radius of edge rods ) along the edge direction.,width=510 ] figure [ fig3 ] shows light trapping for different frequencies at the graded zigzag edge of an hpc , simulated by a finite - difference time - domain ( fdtd ) method @xcite .
the radii of the edge rods are assumed to vary linearly with the position of the edge rods , namely , @xmath31 , where @xmath32 is the position along the edge direction . in our fdtd simulations ,
a continuous gaussian beam with an intensity of 1 and a width of @xmath33 is launched at @xmath30 .
perfectly matched layer absorbing boundaries @xcite are used .
obviously , from figure [ fig3 ] light beams of different frequency can be trapped spatially in different locations .
the scenario is as follows . for a right - propagating gaussian beam
, it will propagate rightwards after launching .
the beam will be slowed down towards right since its group velocity decreases rightwards due to the reduction of the radius of the edge rods .
it will eventually be stopped around the location where the corresponding cutoff frequency of the location coincides with the beam frequency . by inspecting the beam with a reduced frequency of 0.286 , for example
, the maximum intensity of the standstill beam occurs around the position @xmath34 .
the radius of the edge rods around this location is about @xmath35 , very close to but a bit smaller than the radius of @xmath36 that offers a cutoff frequency of 0.286 [ see the inset of figure [ fig2](a ) ] .
for the standstill beam , there are some small additional peaks on the left side of the main peak .
this is because the right - propagating wave may get reflected more or less since the grade of the edge rods is not small enough .
the reflected and the right - propagating waves may interfere with each other , leading to these small additional peaks , which could be suppressed in principle by using a finer grade . in summary , we studied theoretically the edge states at the zigzag edge of hpcs consisting of dielectric rods in air for the transverse magnetic polarization .
with broken inversion symmetry , a pbg exists between the first and second photonic bands .
a unimodal edge state may appear within the pbg , whose dispersion and cutoff frequency can be tuned by changing the radius of the edge rods . for a zigzag edge with a gradually graded radius in edge rods , light beams of different frequencies
can be slowed down and trapped spatially in different locations .
our results show that edge states in hpcs could be exploited in optical storage and enhanced light - matter interactions . + this work was supported by the 973 program ( grant nos .
2011cb922004 , 2012cb921604 and 2013cb632701 ) and the nsfc . | 0.000725 | 0 | 0 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. | ||
198,545 | we present the formalization of dirichlet s theorem on the infinitude of primes in arithmetic progressions , and selberg s elementary proof of the prime number theorem , which asserts that the number @xmath0 of primes less than @xmath1 is asymptotic to @xmath2 , within the proof system metamath . | dirichlet s theorem , or the dirichlet prime number theorem , states that for any @xmath3 and @xmath4 such that @xmath5 , there are infinitely many primes in the progression @xmath6 , or equivalently there are infinitely many @xmath7 .
euler was the first to make progress on this theorem , proving it in the case @xmath8 , and it was shown in full generality by dirichlet in 1837 @xcite .
the prime number theorem gives an overall order of growth of the number of primes less than @xmath1 .
letting @xmath0 denote the number of primes in the interval @xmath9 $ ] ( where @xmath1 is not necessarily an integer ) , the prime number theorem asserts that @xmath10 .
this was first conjectured by legendre in 1797 , and was first proven using complex analysis and the zeta function by jacques hadamard and charles jean de la valle - poussin in 1896 .
two `` elementary '' proofs were later discovered by selberg and erds in 1949 @xcite .
the first formal proof of the prime number theorem was written by jeremy avigad et .
al . in 2004
@xcite , in the isabelle proof language , following selberg s proof , a landmark result for mathematics formalization .
hadamard and valle - poussin s proof was formalized in hol light by john harrison in 2009 @xcite .
john harrison also later formalized dirichlet s theorem in hol light , in 2010 @xcite .
metamath is a formal proof language and computer verification software developed for the purpose of formalizing mathematics in a minimalistic foundational theory @xcite . on may 12 , 2016 and june 1 , 2016 respectively , the author formally verified the following theorems in the metamath formal system : [ , dirichlet s theorem][thm : dirith ] @xmath11 [ , the prime number theorem][thm : pnt ] @xmath12 the latter expression is metamath s notation for @xmath13 , restricted to @xmath14 , which is the domain of definition of the function .
these two theorems are interesting formalization targets as they both have simple statements and `` deep '' proofs , and they are also both members of the `` formalizing 100 theorems '' list maintained by freek wiedijk @xcite , which tracks formalizations of 100 of the most famous theorems in mathematics .
both proofs were written concurrently , over the course of about seven weeks between april 7 and june 1 , 2016 .
this was done mostly because both theorems are in the same general subject ( elementary number theory ) and required similar techniques ( mostly asymptotic approximation of finite sums of reals ) . the primary informal text used for the proof was shapiro @xcite , which devotes a section to dirichlet s theorem and the whole final chapter to selberg and erds s proof of the prime number theorem .
the present work is only a broad overview of the problem and proof method .
interested readers are invited to consult the main theorems http://us.metamath.org/mpegif/pnt.html [ ] and http://us.metamath.org/mpegif/dirith.html [ ] at @xcite , where the exact proof is discussed in detail .
the main arithmetic functions used in the formalization are : @xmath15 additionally , the mbius function @xmath16 is a very useful tool in sum manipulations .
it is the unique multiplicative function such that @xmath17 and @xmath18 for @xmath19 .
this yields the mbius inversion formula : if @xmath20 , then @xmath21 . since @xmath22 ,
this is a very powerful technique for estimating sums `` by inversion '' .
the proof of hadamard and valle - poussin relies on some deep theorems in complex analysis , such as cauchy s theorem , which were not available at the time of this formalization , so instead we targeted the `` elementary '' proof discovered half a century later semi - independently by erds and selberg .
the key step in both proofs is the selberg symmetry formula : [ , selberg symmetry formula][thm : selberg ] @xmath23 in selberg s proof , we leverage this theorem to produce a bound on the residual @xmath24 : [ ] [ thm : pntrlog2bnd ] @xmath25 the goal is to show @xmath10 , but it is easily shown that @xmath26 , so it is equivalent to show that @xmath27 , or @xmath28 , to establish the pnt . given an eventual bound @xmath29 and the estimation @xmath30 , an application of reproduces the original estimate @xmath31 , but using improved bounds on @xmath32 on small intervals we can improve the estimate to @xmath33 for a fixed constant @xmath34 , which produces a sequence of eventual bounds approaching zero , which proves @xmath28 as desired . in dirichlet
s theorem , the focal point is instead the dirichlet characters @xmath35 , which are group homomorphisms from @xmath36 to @xmath37 , extended to @xmath38 with value @xmath39 at non - units , but the general theme of estimation of sums involving @xmath40 and the characters @xmath41 is the same .
in keeping with metamath s tradition of minimal complexity , we used a minimum of definition .
asymptotic estimations are reduced to the class @xmath42 of eventually bounded functions , partial functions @xmath43 such that for some @xmath44 , @xmath45 implies @xmath46 .
an equation such as @xmath47 is rewritten as @xmath48 ( which is correct as long as @xmath49 is eventually nonzero , which is always true in cases of interest ) , and similarly @xmath50 is rewritten as @xmath51 .
a few finite summation theorems take us a long way ; two number - theory specific summation theorems are the following divisor sum commutations : @xmath52 @xmath53 a small amount of calculus was used in the proof , mostly through the following sum estimation theorem , which for example evaluates @xmath30 : [ ] [ thm : dvfsumrlim ] if @xmath54 is a differentiable function with @xmath55 , and @xmath56 is a positive decreasing function that converges to zero , then @xmath57 converges to some @xmath58 and @xmath59 .
.comparison of the present proof with @xcite .
`` ? '' marks an estimated or unknown value . [ cols=">,^,^,^,^ " , ] the comparison of parallel proof attempts in different systems is usually confounded by the many other factors , so these statistics should not be given undue credence . according to @xcite ,
avigad s pnt project was a year - long project by four people , with the majority of the work happening during one summer , while this was a solo project over about seven work weeks .
dirichlet s theorem is 10 pages of informal text of @xcite , and the pnt is 37 pages . although the number of lines in the current proofs seem competitive , this is lost in the gzipped version , because the stored metamath proof is already largely compressed , while the isabelle and hol scripts are plain text .
the de bruijn factors for this work had to be estimated because the tex source for the informal text was not available , but indications suggest that it fares poorly with comparatively large factors 19.9 and 7.67 , respectively . however , when reading these statistics it is important to realize that metamath stores _ proofs _ , not _ proof scripts _ like isabelle and hol .
every inference in the proof is an axiom or theorem of the system , and no proof searches are conducted by the verifier .
this is reflected in the incredibly small verification time , which is normal for metamath proofs .
we do not have exact data on verification time for hol light , but it is believed to be on the order of minutes to hours .
these proofs are important milestones for the metamath project .
they demonstrate that even the largest of formalization projects in high level languages can also be conducted in a `` full transparency''-style system like metamath , with entirely worked - out proofs and with all automation offloaded from the verifier to the proof generation .
abc99 dirichlet , p. g. l. : beweis des satzes , dass jede unbegrenzte arithmetische progression , deren erstes glied und differenz ganze zahlen ohne gemeinschaftlichen factor sind , unendlich viele primzahlen enthlt .
berlin * 48 * , 313342 ( 1837 ) selberg , a. : an elementary proof of the prime - number theorem . ann . of math .
( 2 ) , vol .
50 , pp . 305313 ; reprinted in atle selberg collected papers , springer
verlag , berlin heidelberg new york , 1989 * 1 * , 379387 ( 1949 ) | dirichlet s theorem states @xmath3 @xmath4 infinitely many primes in progression @xmath6 @xmath7 euler first @xmath8 shown by dirichlet in 1837 prime number theorem gives order growth of primes less than @xmath1 @xmath0 primes in interval @xmath9 $ @xmath1 not integer asserts @xmath10 conjectured by legendre in 1797 proven by jacques hadamard charles jean de la valle - poussin in 1896 elementary proofs discovered by selberg erds in 1949 first formal proof of prime number theorem by jeremy avigad in 2004 proof landmark result for mathematics formalization hadamard valle - poussin s proof formalized by john harrison in 2009 harrison formalized dirichlet s theorem in hol light 2010 metamath formal proof language computer verification software formalizing mathematics minimalistic foundational theorymay 12 2016 june 1 2016 author verified theorems metamath formal system dirichlet s dirith @xmath11 prime number pnt @xmath12 latter metamath s notation @xmath13 restricted @xmath14 domain definition function two theorems interesting formalization targets simple statements deep proofs members formalizing 100 theorems list freek wiedijk @xcite 100 famous theorems proofs written concurrently seven weeks april 7 june 1 2016 theorems same subject elementary number theory similar techniques asymptotic approximation finite sums reals primary text proof shapiro @xcite section dirichlet s theorem final chapter selberg and erds s proof prime number theorem present work overview problem proof method consult main theorems http://us.metamath/mpegif/pnt.html/dirith.html @xcite exact proof discussed main arithmetic functions formalization @xmath15 mbius function @xmath16 useful tool sum manipulations unique multiplicative function @xmath17 @xmath18 for @xmath19 yields mbius inversion formula if @xmath20 @xmath21 .@xmath22 powerful technique estimating sums by inversion proof of hadamard valle - poussin relies deep theorems cauchy s theorem not available targeted elementary proof discovered later by erds selberg key step selberg symmetry formula @xmath23 selberg s proof theorem produce bound on residual @xmath24 @xmath25 goal show @xmath10 shown @xmath26 equivalent show @xmath27 @xmath28 establish pnt eventual bound @xmath29 estimation @xmath30 application reproduces original estimate @xmath31 improved bounds on @xmath32 improve estimate to @xmath33 for fixed constant @xmath34 produces eventual bounds approaching zero proves @xmath28 desired dirichlet s theorem focal point dirichlet characters @xmath35 group homomorphisms from @xmath36 to @xmath37 extended to @xmath38 value @xmath39 general theme of estimation sums @xmath40 characters @xmath41 same minimal complexity minimum definition asymptotic estimations reduced to class @xmath42 bounded functions @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 implies @xmath46equation @xmath47 rewritten as @xmath48 correct @xmath49 nonzero @xmath50 rewritten as @xmath51 finite summation theorems long way number - theory divisor sum commutations : @xmath52 @xmath53 small calculus used in proof sum estimation theorem evaluates @xmath30 if @xmath54 differentiable function with @xmath55 @xmath56 positive decreasing function converges to zero @xmath57 converges to @xmath58 @xmath59.comparison present proof with @xcite `` ? '' marks estimated unknown value comparison of parallel proof attempts confounded by other factors statistics not undue credence @xcite avigad s pnt project year - long project four people work one summer solo project seven work weeks dirichlet s theorem 10 pages informal text @xcite pnt 37 pages number of lines in current proofs competitive lost in gzipped version stored metamath proof compressed isabelle hol scripts plain text de bruijn factors estimated tex source not available fares poorly with large factors 19.9 and 7.67statistics metamath stores proofs not scripts like isabelle and hol every inference is axiom or theorem no proof searches conducted by verifier reflected in small verification time normal for metamath proofs exact data on verification time for hol light believed minutes to hours proofs important milestones for metamath project demonstrate formalization projects in high level languages conducted in full transparency'' system like metamath worked - out proofs automation offloaded from verifier to proof generation beweis unbegrenzte arithmetische progression unendlich viele primzahlen enthlt berlin 48 313342 selberg elementary proof of prime - number theorem ann . of math vol . 50 pp . 305313 reprinted in selberg collected papers springer verlag berlin 1989 1 379387 ( 1949 | 0.315194 | 2,001 | 1,054 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,547 | barkhausen noise , including both periodic and aperiodic components , is found in and near the relaxor regime of a familiar relaxor ferroelectric , pbmg@xmath0nb@xmath1o@xmath2 , driven by a periodic electric field .
the temperature dependences of both the amplitude and spectral form show that the size of the coherent dipole moment changes shrink as the relaxor regime is entered , contrary to expectations based on some simple models .
although relaxor ferroelectrics form locally ferroelectric polar nanodomains , underlying chemical disorder somehow prevents the formation of long - range ferroelectric or antiferroelectric order @xcite .
instead , there is a crossover , characterized by faster - than - arrhenius temperature dependence of relaxation rates ( approximately of the vogel - fulcher form , e.g. @xcite ) , to a glassy `` relaxor '' regime .
the key ingredients of a successful model may include static random polar fields ( e.g. @xcite ) , random anisotropy ( e.g. @xcite ) , random interactions among the polar nanodomains ( e.g.@xcite ) , and interactions with soft to phonons @xcite and slow charge - transfer modes @xcite .
nonequilibrium noise and mesoscopic noise provide model - sensitive probes of glassy freezing @xcite , unlike macroscopic linear response and the corresponding equilibrium fluctuations , which show rather generic properties .
the barkhausen effect ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) arises because the polarization changes unevenly as an applied field changes , with the random part of the response only statistically similar between nominally identical samples . for two materials with similar average response functions
, the barkhausen noise will be larger for the material whose polarization makes larger coherent changes .
although simple pictures of interacting polar nanodomains would predict that the dynamically coherent units grow as the frozen regime is entered , a previous attempt to find barkhausen noise in the relaxor regime found none , setting an upper limit on the cooperative changes of the dipole moment @xcite .
large discrete steps in polar order have been found in the best - studied relaxor , pbmg@xmath0nb@xmath1o@xmath2 ( pmn ) , but only after the applied dc electric field was large enough to drive the material into an ordinary ferroelectric regime with macroscopic domains @xcite .
here we report barkhausen noise in the _ nonferroelectric _ ( paraelectric and relaxor ) regimes of pmn , where conventional barkhausen noise from macroscopic domains is absent . the simplest barkhausen model @xcite consists of a set of polarization steps at fixed fields distributed with uniform probability over the field sweep range . for periodically driven fields ,
the noise consists of a periodically repeated random walk , so @xmath3 , the fourier power spectral density of the voltage fluctuations , will consist only of harmonics of the driving frequency @xmath4 , and its spectral envelope will decay as @xmath5 .
if the step pattern changes between cycles ( e.g. , due to thermal jitter in the step times ) then there will be aperiodic noise too .
for fast - relaxing domains which remain in quasi - equilibrium as the field changes , the polarization steps follow the smooth change in boltzmann factor vs. time ( on a coarse time scale ) , causing the @xmath5 envelope to cut off rapidly ( @xmath6 ) above a characteristic frequency @xmath7 @xcite : @xmath8 ( here , @xmath9 is the maximum amplitude of the sinusoidal driving field , @xmath10 is the typical change in electric dipole moment in a single step , and @xmath11 is boltzmann s constant . ) for domains with large barriers to switching , the switches occur as single abrupt steps .
however , thermal jitter in the timing of otherwise reproducible steps also reduces the periodic component above @xmath7 , with a ( numerically computed ) envelope very similar to that for the fast switchers . the missing harmonic power should appear as an aperiodic component of roughly lorentzian shape and corner frequency comparable to @xmath7 .
when this simple independent - step picture applies , the voltage variance ( the integral of @xmath3 ) will grow linearly with @xmath9 ( so long as @xmath12 ) @xcite , being @xcite @xmath13 here @xmath14 is the geometrical capacitance , and we assume the dimensionless dielectric constant @xmath15 . when there is a range of @xmath10 s , @xmath10 in eq .
[ eq : totbkhnoise ] is replaced by @xmath16 . generically , if the non - arrhenius slowing down of relaxation rates arises because interacting nanodomains form clusters which reorient coherently but with barriers which increase with cluster size ( e.g. as in the random - field ising model @xcite ) , then the dipole moments of the coherent clusters ( even if the constituents are randomly aligned ) would grow as @xmath17 was reduced , causing @xmath18 and @xmath7 to rise .
if the activation barrier heights for some clusters become too large for them to respond at or near @xmath4 for a given @xmath9 , then the typical @xmath10 would saturate near the moment of the largest responding clusters .
the size of the largest responding cluster would shrink slightly as @xmath17 is reduced further , but only as @xmath17 to a power less than 1 .
we found neither continued growth nor approximate saturation of the noise magnitude and frequency range , but instead abrupt shrinkage .
our sample consisted of two pieces , each about 0.75 mm thick , from a single crystal of pmn , grown by the chokhralsky method at the rostov - on - don institute of physics .
the sputtered gold contact pads on the main ( 001 ) faces had about 1 mm@xmath19 surface area each . and
@xmath20 at 50 hz , measured at 13 v / cm .
the inset shows the nonlinear out - of - phase response , most apparent at high-@xmath17 where the linear out - of - phase response is tiny.,scaledwidth=40.0% ] standard ac susceptibility measurements at 50 hz showed the usual pmn relaxor behavior , as shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] .
the response was close enough to linear over the field range employed in the noise experiments for the linear susceptibility to suffice for approximate calculations .
previous experiments @xcite have shown that the apparent vogel - fulcher freezing temperature of pmn ( @xmath21 k ) determined by ac response is essentially unchanged over the field range used in these experiments , although it drops sharply at higher fields .
g is the gain of the driving op - amps .
data were taken on the 14-bit converter in sets of 30,000 points with a 10 khz sampling rate , giving 1/3 hz frequency bins in the fourier spectrum .
usually 16 such spectra were averaged .
the anti - alias filter corner frequency was 5 khz , although it should have been 4 khz.,scaledwidth=40.0% ] for the noise measurements , the two halves of the sample were incorporated in a balanced - bridge circuit , as shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] .
this setup allowed us to apply an ac bias up to 10 volts on each half of the sample without overloading the low - noise amplifiers , despite the generation of harmonics by the sample nonlinearity , slow capacitance changes due to systematic aging effects @xcite , and imperfect common - mode rejection .
however , any residual systematic differences in the nonlinearity of the two parts would generate harmonics .
an experiment in which one sample arm was replaced with a polystyrene capacitor indicated significant systematic harmonics out to the fifth harmonic .
we avoided using harmonics lower than the tenth in the data analysis , since systematic nonlinearities are distinct from barkhausen noise .
the ac source has very low levels of noise and distortion , and the analog - to - digital sampling is synchronized well with the ac drive . with @xmath22
v / cm at @xmath23 hz at 244 k ( spectrum 2 ) is shown above a background ( spectrum 1 ) consisting of equilibrium noise from the dissipative sample plus amplifier noise , mainly from current noise from the stanford 550 preamp .
60 hz and its harmonics have been edited out.,scaledwidth=40.0% ] fig .
[ fig3 ] shows a typical @xmath3 with , roughly as expected , a mixture of periodic and broad aperiodic noise .
the wings around @xmath4 ( and to a lesser extent around low harmonics ) were not anticipated , but these can arise from small drifts in the bridge cancellation as the sample ages .
the size of the polarization events , calculated below from @xmath3 , was far too small for them to be discerned individually . for ( a ) aperiodic and ( b ) periodic components.,scaledwidth=40.0% ] since the spectral form is close to the independent - step expectation , we can extract a typical step size @xmath10 , although we doubt that the polarization changes literally consist of simple discrete steps . as shown in fig .
[ fig4 ] , both periodic and aperiodic components of the noise grow nonlinearly with @xmath9 over the range explored .
thus the @xmath10 calculated at some @xmath9 gives only a typical dipole step size under the particular drive conditions .
the form of the nonlinearity suggests a broad distribution of @xmath10 s , with many small @xmath10 s showing up in the noise only as @xmath9 is increased enough to make @xmath24 for that @xmath10 .
the form of the aperiodic spectrum indicates a similar distribution . although we are not yet confident in extracting absolute step sizes from this new technique ( mainly due to the difficulty of removing all artifacts from the lower harmonics , which contain the most power ) , we can use eq .
[ eq : totbkhnoise ] to calculate a lower - bound estimate for a typical @xmath10 by integrating the broad aperiodic spectrum only .
( we assume this @xmath10 reflects about how big the cooperative changes are regardless of whether they are simple discrete steps . ) at @xmath25 k , just above the relaxor regime , at the largest @xmath9 used , the result is about @xmath26 c cm , which apparently would grow at higher @xmath9 . under the same conditions ,
the envelope of the harmonic noise has a @xmath5 tail extending from about 1 khz to 4 khz , the top of our measured range , indicating that there are some discrete dipole switches as large as @xmath27 c cm .
an order - of - magnitude estimate of the moment of a polar nanodomain at 250 k , based on the range of the static polar correlations @xcite and the saturation polarization @xcite , would be about @xmath28 c cm .
thus it seems that even in the _ paraelectric _ regime there are some dynamically coherent units larger than single polar nanodomains . despite the uncertainties in the absolute calibration , we can obtain a good indication of how typical @xmath10 s depend on @xmath17 , a key issue for relaxor models . for independent steps , the quantity @xmath29 is proportional to the actual @xmath10 s under particular experimental conditions .
fig .
[ fig5 ] shows how some periodic and aperiodic components of @xmath30 depend on @xmath17 at fixed @xmath9 .
we pick spectral components in an octave around @xmath31 , because in this range the signal - to - background is still good , we expect few artifacts in the harmonics , and the @xmath17-dependence of @xmath10 shows up in @xmath3 both via the overall magnitude and via the @xmath17-dependence of @xmath7 .
( other frequency components show the same sort of behavior , just less clearly . ) , are shown vs. @xmath17 at two different @xmath9.,scaledwidth=40.0% ] as seen in fig .
[ fig5 ] , as the relaxor regime is approached from high @xmath17 , the spectral components of @xmath32 either rise slowly , as one would guess from the growth of medium - range static correlations @xcite , or show little change .
however , below 235 k to 250 k , both periodic and aperiodic components drop sharply , in sharp contrast to the continued growth of static correlations .
the factor @xmath33 accounts for less than half of this drop .
the width of the envelope of the harmonic components is also @xmath17-dependent , being largest ( for @xmath34 v / cm ) at 250 k. in contrast to the long @xmath5 tail at 250 k , below 250 k the harmonics fell sharply into the anharmonic background , e.g. becoming undetectable above about 900 hz at 210 k , confirming that the largest dipole moment steps occur near 250 k. in summary , our noise results indicate abrupt shrinkage of the typical net dipole moment of the dynamically coherent changes ( at fixed driving field ) as the relaxor regime is entered .
we do not want to burden this experimental result with much theory , but some initial comments should be helpful .
we know of no proposed model in which the coherent dipole moment differences between the _ equilibrium _ states at different fields would shrink sharply in the relaxor regime ( i.e. , relaxors are not believed to be frustrated antiferroelectrics ) .
rather , the shrinkage of the steps found on a fixed frequency scale should be related to the vogel - fulcher kinetics @xcite , i.e. , to the rapid growth of barrier heights as the relaxor regime is approached .
although our results do not dictate a model for the relaxor transition in pmn , we can rule out some models . a model of the dynamics with a fixed set of relaxation modes with a fixed broad unimodal distribution of activation barriers ( presumably monotonically increasing in @xmath10 ) @xcite , would predict that the characteristic @xmath10 is a weakly increasing function of @xmath17 at all @xmath17 , and hence is inconsistent with our results . for
simple growth of independent polar nanodomains , the dipoles grow along with the anisotropy barriers , so the typical dipole moment for which the field ( plus thermal activation ) allows switches at rates of order @xmath7 would continue to grow .
for formation of coherently flipping clusters , the typical moment also grows with the number of nanodomains ( probably as a square root ) . although the moment to barrier ratio would be lower for larger clusters , the moment of the largest clusters with rapid enough driven kinetics would approximately saturate . unless there were a strange distribution of cluster sizes , so that as the typical size grew , the mean of those remaining below some fixed cutoff would shrink , such models would not reproduce our results . thus the barkhausen results strongly suggest that the rapid growth of barriers is not just the result of nanodomain growth or of collective nanodomain clusters forming . instead , it seems that each nanodomain s contribution to the barriers grows much more rapidly than its contribution to the dipole moment , as in a recent phenomenological model @xcite , suggesting that less - polar degrees of freedom are freezing along with the polar nanodomain orientations .
another indication of some such effects is that the low - temperature linear heat capacity specifically associated with the relaxor @xcite gives a dimensionless entropy of about @xmath35 per nanodomain .
models of relaxor freezing invoking strong coupling of nanodomain polarization to multiple slow local degrees of freedom ( particularly charge transfers ) and to soft to phonon modes @xcite have been proposed to account for clusters with multiple metastable polarization states having a roughly uniform distribution in solid angle @xcite .
such models would allow complex aging @xcite even in small clusters of nanodomains .
whether or not such models prove successful , the barkhausen data provide a new qualitative constraint on models for the relaxor transition , which has thus far provided a target for somewhat under - constrained theory . | this work was funded by nsf dmr 99 - 81869 . | funded nsf 99 - 81869 | 0.066106 | 16 | 10 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,550 | it has been conjectured that the statistical properties of zeros of the riemann zeta function near @xmath0 tend , as @xmath1 , to the distribution of eigenvalues of large random matrices from the unitary ensemble . at finite @xmath2 numerical results
show that the nearest - neighbour spacing distribution presents deviations with respect to the conjectured asymptotic form .
we give here arguments indicating that to leading order these deviations are the same as those of unitary random matrices of finite dimension @xmath3 , where @xmath4 is a well defined constant .
24.5 cm | the study of connections between random matrix theory and properties of the riemann zeta function , @xmath5 , has known recently significant developments @xcite .
a central point is hugh montgomery s ( generalized ) conjecture @xcite that in the asymptotic limit ( high on the critical line for @xmath6 ) the fluctuation properties of non - trivial riemann zeros are the same as for the circular unitary ensemble ( @xmath7 ) of @xmath8 random unitary matrices ( with haar measure ) in the limit of large dimensionality , @xmath9 .
in particular , the normalized pair correlation function of the riemann zeros with @xmath10 is conjectured to be @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the unfolded distance between zeros ( i.e. the mean spacing is set to one ) .
andrew odlyzko , since the late 70 s , started accurate and extensive numerical computations of riemann zeros in order to check this and other conjectures @xcite .
his main result is that in the limit @xmath10 correlation functions of riemann zeros do agree with random matrix predictions .
for instance , in fig .
[ fig1](a ) the density distribution @xmath13 of spacings among consecutive zeros of @xmath5 ( called the nearest
neighbour spacing distribution in random matrix literature ) is plotted for a billion zeros around the @xmath14-th zero .
the agreement with the cue asymptotic prediction @xmath15 ( represented by a solid line in that figure ) is remarkable .
it is interesting to look at the difference @xmath16 between the computed and the conjectured distributions ( see fig .
[ fig1](b ) ) . though the difference is small ( of order @xmath17 ) it has a clear structure with a nontrivial @xmath12 dependence .
one may wonder how this difference compares with the one obtained , within random matrix theory , between the asymptotic and a finite @xmath18 calculation .
to proceed , one needs a criterion for the size of the matrix to compare with .
the simplest assumption is to choose @xmath19 , where @xmath20 this matrix size is obtained by equating the local density of zeros at height @xmath2 along the critical line to the density of eigenvalues of the @xmath21 unitary matrix @xcite .
= 6.7 in = 2.5 in [ fig1 ] this dimensional correspondence has been successful when comparing statistical properties of @xmath22 at finite @xmath2 with those of characteristic polynomials of @xmath7 matrices of size @xmath19 @xcite .
the riemann zeros in fig .
[ fig1 ] are located in a window around @xmath23 , which gives @xmath24 .
the difference between the finite @xmath18 ( with @xmath19 ) and the asymptotic nearest neighbour spacing distributions is represented by a dashed line in fig .
[ fig1](b ) .
though the functional form of the correction is qualitatively correct , its amplitude is clearly too small ( by a factor of order 20 ) . in his paper @xcite ,
a. odlyzko commented : clearly there is structure in the difference graph , and the challenge is to understand where it comes from. the purpose of this note is to provide some elements in this direction .
let us first analyze the corrections to the asymptotic two point function ( [ r2gue ] ) for @xmath21 random matrices from the circular unitary ensemble @xmath25 and for zeros of the riemann zeta function .
the comparison between them will provide an effective set of rules or correspondences between both sequences .
we start first with random matrix theory . for @xmath18-dimensional unitary matrices
the @xmath26point correlation functions are given by @xcite @xmath27 @xmath28 is the corresponding kernel , @xmath29 where @xmath30 and @xmath31 in particular , the unfolded two point correlation function takes the form @xmath32 the expansion ( [ kern ] ) leads to @xmath33 this formula expresses the correlation function as the asymptotic result eq .
( [ r2gue ] ) plus corrections proportional to inverse even powers of the matrix dimension .
notice that the corresponding expansion for random hermitian matrices ( gaussian unitary ensemble ) is different , it is non analytic and includes a term proportional to @xmath34 ( cf @xcite ) .
we now need an equivalent result for the riemann zeros .
an heuristic formula for the two - point correlation function for these zeros was obtained by bogomolny and keating in ref.@xcite using the hardy - littlewood conjecture for the distribution of prime pairs ( for more details see @xcite ) .
it states that the two - point correlation function of riemann zeros , @xmath35 , is the sum of three terms @xmath36 where the smooth density of zeros , @xmath37 , is asymptotically @xmath38 and the diagonal , @xmath39 , and off - diagonal , @xmath40 , parts are given by the following convergent expressions @xmath41\ ] ] and @xmath42 + { \rm c. c. } \ .\ ] ] here the summation and the product are taken over all primes @xmath43 . in @xcite it was checked that these formulas agree very well with odlyzko s results for the two - point correlation function of riemann zeros .
the unfolded two point correlation function is obtained by measuring distances between zeros in units of the local mean spacing , @xmath44 we are interested in the corrections to the asymptotic behavior of @xmath45 in the limit when @xmath1 . in this limit @xmath46 and the argument of @xmath47 in eq.([r2u ] ) becomes small ( keeping @xmath12 finite ) .
therefore , one can expand @xmath35 for @xmath48 . to perform the expansion
it is convenient to use the known series @xmath49 where @xmath50 are the stieljes constants , and the following auxiliary expansions : @xmath51 where @xmath52 and @xmath53 = 1 + c_0 \epsilon^2 + { { \rm i}}q \ \epsilon^3 + { \cal o } ( \epsilon^4)\ ] ] with @xmath54 collecting the different terms in the expansion , one gets @xmath55 and @xmath56 { { \rm e}}^{{{\rm i}}2 \pi { \overline{\rho}}\epsilon } + { \rm c. c.}\ .\ ] ] the unfolded two point correlation function takes therefore the form @xmath57 equation ( [ r2r1 ] ) expresses the two point correlation function of riemann zeros as the asymptotic random matrix result given by eq .
( [ r2gue ] ) , plus corrections that are proportional to inverse powers of the average density of zeros .
the comparison of eqs.([r2cue ] ) and ( [ r2r1 ] ) shows that the leading terms coincide , as conjectured by montgomery . to relate sub - leading terms we proceed as follows .
up to @xmath58 in eq .
( [ r2r1 ] ) , the term of @xmath59 can be absorbed in the term of @xmath60 by rescaling the @xmath12 variable .
equation ( [ r2r1 ] ) now takes the form @xmath61 where @xmath62 @xmath63 .
the comparison of eqs .
( [ r2cue ] ) and ( [ r2r2 ] ) leads to the following conclusions : * to leading order in @xmath64 the two point correlation function of the riemann zeros coincides with that of eigenvalues of random @xmath7 matrices of effective dimension @xmath65 , where @xmath66 where @xmath67 . *
the next - to - leading order is obtained by rescaling the variable @xmath12 in the first correction term according to @xmath68 where @xmath69 is given by eq.([alpha ] ) .
the effective matrix size obtained from our analysis is , therefore , different from @xmath70 ( eq . ( [ n0 ] ) ) , the relation between them being a multiplicative factor @xmath71 .
in general , to compute the nearest neighbour spacing distribution it is necessary to know correlation functions of arbitrary number of points .
though for the riemann zeros the hardy - littlewood conjecture is sufficient to obtain all correlation functions @xcite , the computations are cumbersome and for simplicity we shall use another method . for cue , the nearest
neighbour spacing distribution may be expressed as @xcite @xmath72 where @xmath73 \ , 1 \leq j , k \leq n \ .\ ] ] some physical arguments @xcite indicate that to leading order , under quite general conditions deviations from standard random matrix theory in systems with no time reversal symmetry are reduced to a change of the kernel only , and that the correction term is the same as for @xmath7 matrices with an effective matrix size .
= 6.6 in = 2.4 in [ figg2 ] if we accept this conjecture then from the results of the previous section it follows that to leading order _ all _ correlation functions of the riemann zeros are the same as those of @xmath7 matrices with effective dimension given by eq .
( [ neff ] ) .
in particular , it means that the nearest
neighbour spacing distribution of the riemann zeros can be calculated as follows .
first , find the expansion of the nearest
neighbour distribution for @xmath7 random unitary matrices in inverse powers of @xmath18 , namely @xmath74 ( the fact that the first correction is of order @xmath75 follows from results in @xcite ) .
the expansion ( [ pscue ] ) is difficult to derive analytically .
we have therefore computed numerically the spacing distribution @xmath76 from eqs .
( [ psdef]-[enofs ] ) .
the correction term is then obtained by computing @xmath77 $ ] for increasing values of @xmath18 .
an alternative method would be to use a non - linear differential equation for @xmath78 as derived in @xcite .
second , to leading order , at a given height @xmath2 above the real axis , replace in eq .
( [ pscue ] ) @xmath18 by @xmath79 given by eq .
( [ neff ] ) .
finally , we shall approximate the next - to - leading correction of @xmath80 according to the rule ( [ sca ] ) .
in such an approximation the nearest
neighbour spacing distribution of the riemann zeros equals the universal random matrix result , @xmath81 , plus the correction @xmath82 , where @xmath83 @xmath79 and @xmath69 are given by eq .
( [ neff ] ) and ( [ alpha ] ) , respectively .
figure 2(a ) shows the comparison between the numerical results and eq.([psz2 ] ) for zeros located on a window around @xmath23 ( as in fig .
[ fig1 ] ) .
the effective matrix size is @xmath84 ( instead of @xmath24 ) , and @xmath85 .
the agreement is quite good , and shows that @xmath79 is the correct matrix size in this case . for comparison ,
we have plotted as a dashed curve the theoretical formula ( [ psz2 ] ) without the rescaling of the variable @xmath12 .
figure 2(b ) is a plot of the difference between odlyzko s results and the prediction ( [ psz2 ] ) .
there is still some structure visible , which might be attributed to the @xmath86 correction . to test the convergence ,
we have made the same plot but now using one billion zeros located on a window around @xmath87 , which corresponds to @xmath88 ( instead of @xmath89 ) and @xmath90 ( fig .
[ fig3](a ) ) .
now the agreement is clearly improved .
the difference between the prediction ( [ psz2 ] ) and the numerical results , plotted in fig .
[ fig3](b ) , shows a structureless remain .
= 2.5 in [ fig3 ]
for zeros of the riemann zeta function located around @xmath0 , we derived an heuristic formula for the nearest neighbour spacing distribution that contains finite@xmath2 corrections .
we argued that to leading order the corrections are the same as for random matrices from the circular unitary ensemble of size @xmath91 .
we proposed to describe the next to leading order correction as a simple scaling of the dominant term .
two main conjectures were used .
the most important is the explicit expression for the two point correlation function for the riemann zeros ( eqs .
( [ diag ] ) and ( [ off ] ) ) obtained in @xcite .
the second is the statement that to leading order deviations from random matrix predictions reduce to a change of the kernel ( [ kern ] ) .
it follows that our procedure to compute the finite@xmath2 corrections of the complex riemann zeros from unitary matrices should be valid for any local statistics .
it is known that at finite heights @xmath2 above the real axis the appropriate symmetry group of the riemann zeta function is not @xmath7 .
it has been conjectured @xcite that @xmath92 is a member of a family obeying the symplectic symmetry @xmath93 .
the possible connections of our results with finite@xmath2 corrections associated to this symmetry deserve to be investigated .
p. j. forrester , n. c. snaith and j. j. m. verbaarschot , eds , _ special issue : random matrix theory _ , j. phys a * 36 * ( 2003 ) 2859 - 3646 ; f. mezzadri , n. c. snaith , eds , _ recent perspectives in random matrix theory and number theory _ , cambridge university press , cambridge , 2005 .
a. m. odlyzko , _ the @xmath94-nd zero of the riemann zeta function _ , in dynamical , spectral , and arithmetic zeta functions , m. van frankenhuysen and m. l. lapidus , eds . ,
soc . , contemporary math .
series * 290 * ( 2001 ) 139 - 144 .
e. b. bogomolny , _ spectral statistics and periodic orbits _ , in new directions in quantum chaos , proceedings of the international school of physics `` enrico fermi '' , course cxliii , g. casati , i. guarneri and u. smilansky , eds , varenna , 2000 , 333 - 368 .
e. b. bogomolny and j. p. keating , _ random matrix theory and the riemann zeros i : three and four correlations _ , nonlinearity * 8 * ( 1995 ) 1115 - 1131 , _ ibid _ _ ii : n point correlations _ , nonlinearity * 9 * ( 1995 ) 911 - 935 .
a. v. andreev and b. l. altshuler , _ spectral statistics beyond random matrix theory _ , phys .
* 75 * ( 1995 ) 902 - 905 ; s. m. nishigaki , _ level spacings at the metal - insulator transition _ , phys .
e * 59 * ( 1999 ) 2853 - 2862 . | study connections random matrix theory riemann zeta function @xmath5 significant developments central point is hugh montgomery s conjecture asymptotic limit @xmath6 fluctuation properties of non - trivial riemann zeros same as circular ensemble @xmath8 random unitary matrices in limit large dimensionality @xmath9 normalized pair correlation function of riemann zeros with @xmath10 conjectured be @xmath11 where @xmath12 is unfolded distance between zeros mean spacing set one andrew odlyzko started numerical computations of riemann zeros check conjectures result in limit @xmath10 correlation functions of riemann zeros agree with random matrix predictions fig density distribution @xmath13 of spacings among consecutive zeros of @xmath5 nearest neighbour spacing distribution plotted for billion zeros around @xmath14-th zero agreement with asymptotic prediction @xmath15 solid line remarkable difference @xmath16 between computed conjectured distributions fig(b difference small clear structure nontrivial @xmath12 dependence difference compares with asymptotic finite @xmath18 calculationneeds criterion for size matrix compare assumption choose @xmath19 @xmath20 matrix size obtained equating local density zeros at height @xmath2 to density eigenvalues @xmath21 unitary matrix = 6.7 = 2.5 in dimensional correspondence successful comparing statistical properties @xmath22 finite @xmath2 with polynomials @xmath7 matrices size @xmath19 @xcite riemann zeros window around @xmath23 gives @xmath24 difference between finite @xmath18 @xmath19 asymptotic nearest neighbour spacing distributions represented by dashed line in fig . functional form correction correct amplitude too small factor 20 ) odlyzko commented structure in difference graph challenge understand purpose note provide elements direction analyze corrections to asymptotic two point function for @xmath21 random matrices circular unitary ensemble @xmath25 zeros riemann zeta function comparison rules correspondences sequences start with random matrix theory@xmath18-dimensional unitary matrices @xmath26point correlation functions by @xcite @xmath27 kernel @xmath30 unfolded two point correlation function @xmath32 expansion kern leads to @xmath33 formula expresses correlation asymptotic result eq . r2gue ] ) corrections proportional inverse powers matrix dimension expansion random hermitian matrices different non analytic includes term proportional to @xmath34 need equivalent result riemann zeros heuristic formula two - point correlation function obtained by bogomolny keating@xcite hardy - littlewood conjecture distribution prime pairs two - point correlation function of riemann zeros sum of three terms @xmath36 smooth density of zeros asymptotically @xmath38 diagonal off - diagonal parts given by convergent expressions @xmath41 @xmath42 summation product taken over primes @xmath43 formulas agree with odlyzko s results two - point correlation function riemann zeros correlation function obtained measuring distances between zeros local mean spacing interested corrections asymptotic behavior @xmath45 limit @xmath1limit @xmath46 argument @xmath47 eq.([r2u small @xmath12 finite expand @xmath35 for @xmath48 use series @xmath49 @xmath50 stieljes constants auxiliary expansions @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 = 1 + c_0 \epsilon^2 + \rm\epsilon^3\epsilon^4) @xmath54 collecting terms expansion @xmath55 @xmath56 i}}2\epsilon two point correlation function form @xmath57 equation ( [ r2r1 ] expresses two point correlation function riemann zeros asymptotic random matrix result eq . ( [ r2gue ] ) corrections proportional inverse powers average density zeros comparison eqs.([r2cue ] [ r2r1 ] leading terms coincide montgomery relate sub - leading terms @xmath58 r2r1 term @xmath59 absorbed term @xmath60 rescaling @xmath12 variable equation r2r1 form @xmath61 where @xmath62 @xmath63 comparison eqsr2cue ] r2r2 ] ) leads to conclusions leading order in @xmath64 two point correlation function riemann zeros coincides with eigenvalues random @xmath7 matrices @xmath65 @xmath66 next - to - leading order obtained rescaling variable @xmath12 first correction term according to @xmath68 @xmath69 given by eq.([alpha ] ) effective matrix size different from @xmath70 relation multiplicative factor @xmath71 compute nearest neighbour spacing distribution necessary know correlation functions of arbitrary points riemann zeros hardy - littlewood conjecture sufficient correlation functions computations cumbersome use another method nearest neighbour spacing distribution expressed as @xcite @xmath72 @xmath73 physical arguments indicate order deviations from standard random matrix theory systems no time reversal symmetry reduced to change kernel correction term same as for @xmath7 matrices effective matrix size . = 6.6 2.4 in accept conjecture leading order correlation functions of riemann zeros same as @xmath7 matrices with effective dimension eq nearest neighbour spacing distribution of riemann zeros calculatedfind expansion nearest neighbour distribution for @xmath7 random unitary matrices inverse powers @xmath18 @xmath74 first correction @xmath75 follows from results @xcite expansion ( [ pscue ] difficult derive analytically computed numerically spacing distribution @xmath76 from eqs- correction term obtained computing @xmath77 increasing values @xmath18 alternative method use non - linear differential equation for @xmath78 derived @xcite @xmath2 replace @xmath18 by @xmath79 eq approximate next - - leading correction @xmath80 rule ( [ sca ] ) nearest neighbour spacing distribution riemann zeros equals universal random matrix result @xmath81 plus correction @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath79 @xmath69 given by eq . neff alpha figure 2(a ) comparison numerical results eq.([psz2 ] ) for zeros window around @xmath23 effective matrix size @xmath84 @xmath85 agreement @xmath79 correct matrix size plotted dashed curve theoretical formula ( psz2 ] ) without rescaling variable @xmath12 figure 2(b ) plot difference odlyzko s results prediction psz2 ] structure visible attributed @xmath86 correction test convergence same plot using one billion zeros around @xmath87 corresponds @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 fig fig3](a agreement improved difference prediction psz2 numerical results fig fig3](b shows structureless remain . = 2.5 fig3 ] zeros riemann zeta function around @xmath0 derived heuristic formula for nearest neighbour spacing distribution finite@xmath2 corrections argued corrections same random matrices from circular unitary ensemble size @xmath91 proposed describe next leading order correction simple scaling dominant term two conjectures used explicit expression two point correlation function riemann zeros @xcite leading order deviations from random matrix predictions reduce to change kernel ) procedure compute finite@xmath2 corrections complex riemann zeros unitary matrices valid for local statistics finite heights @xmath2 above real axis appropriate symmetry group riemann zeta function not @xmath7 conjectured @xmath92 member family obeying symplectic symmetry @xmath93 connections results finite@xmath2 corrections forrester n snaith verbaarschot special issue random matrix theory phys 36 2003 ) 2859 - 3646 f mezzadri snaith perspectives random matrix theory number theory cambridge university press 2005 odlyzko @xmath94-nd zero riemann zeta function dynamical spectral arithmetic zeta functions m. van frankenhuysen lapidus eds contemporary math 290 2001 ) 139 - 144 b bogomolny spectral statistics periodic orbits new directions quantum chaos proceedings international school fermi course cxliii g. casati guarneri u smilansky 2000 333 - 368 bogomolny j p keating random matrix theory riemann zeros three correlations nonlinearity 8 1995 ) 1115 - 1131 point correlations 9 1995 ) 911 - 935. andreev l altshuler spectral statistics random matrix theory phys. 75 1995 ) 902 - 905 nishigaki level spacings metal - insulator transition phys 59 1999 ) 2853 - 2862 | 0.50674 | 3,378 | 1,744 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,558 | the aims of the calice test beam program are presented .
the proposed electronics readout system for the calice ecal is described .
it is a purpose - built vme - based , unbuffered system . | the calice collaboration @xcite is a group of 140 people from 24 institutes in europe , us and asia .
the collaboration is planning a beam test program starting in 2004 to study both electromagnetic ( ecal ) and hadronic ( hcal ) calorimeters for a future linear collider ( lc ) .
the ecal will be a silicon - tungsten sandwich sampling calorimeter @xcite and there are various options under investigation for the hcal , namely using tile scintillators with analogue readout @xcite or rpcs or gems with digital readout @xcite as the sensors .
the main driver for these choices is the requirement of fine granularity for the `` energy flow '' algortihms used to obtain the jet resolutions necessary for lc physics @xcite .
the beam test program will test the ecal and all versions of the hcal in an integrated data acquisition system so the data from both calorimeters can be analysed together .
it is planned to do a systematic study of the dependence of the shower structure on particle energy , type and incident angle , as well as adding a `` preshower '' in front of the calorimeter to generate narrow cones of particles to simulate jets .
the total number of different configurations which will be tested is of order @xmath0 , and to see the fine detail required , of order @xmath1 events is estimated to be needed for each configuration .
the calice beam test ecal will consist of 30 layers of silicon and tungsten .
each silicon layer comprises nine wafers , each being a @xmath2 array of diode pads and each of these is a readout channel .
this gives 324 channels per layer , or 9720 channels in total .
these need to be read for every event , preferably without any threshold or other data suppression so as to allow pedestal and noise studies offline .
the signals expected in the diodes range from the energy deposited by one minimum ionising particle ( mip ) to around 1000 mips in the core of high energy electron showers , a range of 10 bits . the intrinsic noise from the on - detector preamplifier @xcite is expected to be equivalent to around 0.1 mip or less .
it is of interest to measure this noise level , so the dynamic range required is 14 bits in total . at the highest energies of around 1000 mips ,
the resolution is degraded if the precision is below a mip , so 10 bits of precision are required
. the on - detector preamplifier has a cr - rc shaper with a peaking time of 180ns .
this defines the trigger latency needed to ensure the waveform is sampled at this peak .
a trigger jitter of 10ns is acceptable ; this leads to a maximum shift below the peak of 0.1% , which is within the 10 bits precision requirement .
it consists of 15 identical readout boards and a single trigger board .
the readout boards handle the on - detector preamplifier signals and all digitisation for two layers of the ecal , or 648 channels .
these signals are received on six cables per readout board .
each cable connects to an electrically independent on - detector board which holds the preamplifier and which handles three silicon wafers of 108 channels .
the trigger board is a simple board to prevent further triggers until readout is complete and to distribute the trigger and the system clock across the backplane to the readout boards .
it contains very few components and will not be described further below .
an schematic diagram of the readout board is also shown in figure [ fig : overview ] .
the board is controlled by a `` master fpga '' which handles the vme interface and distributes the clock and trigger from the backplane across the board .
it interacts with the `` slave fpgas '' by distributing configuration data ( written to the board via vme ) and collects the event data prior to vme readout .
there is one slave fpga for each cable from the on - detector electronics and so six per readout board .
each operates independently of the others although they contain identical firmware so , in standard operation , they would effectively be synchronised together .
the slave fpgas send the control and timing signals needed by the on - detector electronics and receive six analogue signal lines .
the 108 channels are multiplexed onto these six lines , with 18 channels per line .
the slave fpgas control six 16-bit , 500khz adcs , one per signal line .
the extra bits give robustness against loss due to non - optimal range matching .
the adc speed results in a time to digitise all 18 channels of less than 50@xmath3s , or only 5% of the allowed 1ms event time .
the trigger is also distributed to the on - detector electronics via the slave fpgas , rounded to a 100 mhz clock , giving the required 10ns maximum jitter . to save any parallel development of similar electronics for the tile hcal option , the on - detector electronics for
this system is attempting to become similar enough to the ecal such that the same readout boards could be used for both .
there will be around 1500 channels in the tile scintillator hcal .
the 16-bit adc would be more than ample for the range and precision required and would result in 3kbytes per event .
the number of channels multiplexed per board for the hcal is also not known , so it is not clear how many extra readout boards would need to be fabricated .
however , it is clear that a common solution would save significant effort and is being actively pursued by the groups involved .
the maximum rate of data readout over vme is around 30mbytes / s . for a desired 1khz rate , this implies the event size needs to be below 30kbytes .
there will be no threshold suppression of the data on the readout board , so the ecal data size will be 19kbytes per event .
both options of the hcal will be around 3kbytes and the size of any beam monitoring , particle idenitification and trigger data are uncertain , but likely to be around 1kbyte .
hence , the total event size should be around 25kbytes .
this makes a 1khz peak rate tight but not impossible .
the readout board vme interface will be optimised for speed , using dma transfers and asynchronous vme access .
a fallback solution will be to split the system between two or more crates , with two vme - pci bus convertors . | calice collaboration @xcite 140 people from 24 institutes europe us asia planning beam test program 2004 study electromagnetic and hadronic hcal calorimeters for future linear collider lc ) ecal silicon - tungsten sandwich sampling calorimeter options for hcal tile scintillators analogue or rpcs gems digital readout as sensors main driver fine granularity for energy flow algortihms jet resolutions for lc physics beam test program ecal hcal in integrated data acquisition system data planned systematic study of dependence shower structure on particle energy type incident angle adding preshower '' in front calorimeter narrow cones particles simulate jets total number configurations tested order @xmath0 order @xmath1 events needed for each configuration calice beam test ecal 30 layers of silicon tungsten each silicon layer nine wafers each diode pads each readout channel 324 channels per layer 9720 channels total read for every event without threshold data suppression pedestal noise studies offline signals diodes range from one minimum ionising particle to 1000 mips in high energy electron showers range 10noise from on - detector preamplifier @xcite equivalent to around 0.1 mip or less noise dynamic range required 14 bits at highest energies around 1000 mips resolution degraded if precision below mip 10 bits precision required preamplifier has cr - rc shaper peaking time 180ns defines trigger latency waveform trigger jitter of 10ns acceptable to maximum shift below peak 0.1% within 10 bits precision requirement consists of 15 readout boards single trigger board readout boards handle preamplifier signals digitisation for two layers of ecal 648 channels signals received on six cables per readout board each cable connects to independent on - detector board holds preamplifier handles three silicon wafers of 108 channels trigger board simple prevent further triggers until readout trigger system clock to readout boards few components schematic diagram readout board shown in figure controlled by master fpga handles vme interface distributes clock trigger interacts with slave fpgas configuration data collects event data readout one slave fpga for each cable six per readout board each operates independently identical firmware synchronised togetherslave fpgas send control timing signals - detector receive six analogue signal lines 108 channels multiplexed onto six lines 18 channels per line control six 16-bit 500khz adcs one per signal line extra bits give robustness against loss non - range matching adc speed 18 channels less than 50@xmath3s 5% 1ms event time trigger distributed to on - detector electronics via fpgas rounded to 100 mhz clock 10ns maximum jitter on - detector electronics similar to ecal same readout boards for both around 1500 channels in tile scintillator hcal 16-bit adc ample for range precision 3kbytes per event number channels multiplexed per board for hcal not known extra readout boards common solution effort pursued maximum rate data readout over vme around 30mbytes / s 1khz rate event size below 30kbytes no threshold suppression data on readout board ecal data size 19kbytes per event both options hcal around 3kbytes beam monitoring particle idenitification trigger data uncertain likely around 1kbyte total event size around 25kbytes 1khz peak rate tight not impossiblereadout board vme interface optimised speed dma transfers asynchronous vme access split system crates vme - pci bus convertors | 0.264391 | 1,404 | 726 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
198,559 | the type ii - plateau supernova ( sn ii - p ) sn 2004dj was the first sn
ii - p for which spectropolarimetry data were obtained with fine temporal sampling before , during , and after its fall off of the photometric plateau the point that marks the transition from the photospheric to the nebular phase in sne ii - p .
unpolarized during the plateau , sn 2004dj showed a dramatic spike in polarization during the descent off of the plateau , and then exhibited a smooth polarization decline over the next two hundred days .
this behavior was interpreted by leonard et al .
( 2006 ) as evidence for a strongly non - spherical explosion mechanism that had imprinted asphericity only in the innermost ejecta . in this brief report , we compare nine similarly well - sampled epochs of spectropolarimetry of the type ii - p sn 2008bk to those of sn 2004dj .
in contrast to sn 2004dj , sn 2008bk became polarized well before the end of the plateau and also retained a nearly constant level of polarization through the early nebular phase . curiously , although the onset and persistence of polarization differ between the two objects , the detailed spectropolarimetric characteristics at the epochs of recorded maximum polarization for the two objects are extremely similar , feature by feature .
we briefly interpret the data in light of non - local - thermodynamic equilibrium , time - dependent radiative - transfer simulations specifically crafted for sn ii - p ejecta .
address = department of astronomy , san diego state university , san diego , ca
92182 , usa ; leonard@sciences.sdsu.edu
address = laboratoire dastrophysique de marseille , universit de provence , cnrs , 38 rue frdric - joliot - curie , f-13388 marseille cedex 13 , france address = department of physics and astronomy , university of pittsburgh , 3941 ohara street , pittsburgh , pa 15260 , usa address = departamento de ciencias fisicas , universidad andres bello , avda . republica 252 , santiago , chile , altaddress = departamento de astronomia , universidad de chile , casilla 36-d , santiago , chile | spectropolarimetry offers a direct probe of early - time sn geometry since a hot , young sn atmosphere is dominated by electron scattering , which by its nature is highly polarizing . for an unresolved source that has a spherical distribution of scattering electrons ,
the directional components of the electric vectors of the scattered photons cancel exactly , yielding zero net linear polarization .
any asymmetry in the distribution of the scattering electrons , or of absorbing material overlying the electron - scattering atmosphere , results in incomplete cancellation , and produces a net polarization ( see , e.g. , * ? ? ?
type ii - plateau supernovae ( sne ii - p ) are the canonical core - collapse events that arise from isolated red supergiant stars @xcite .
the precise nature of the mechanism responsible for the stellar explosion , however , remains the subject of considerable debate @xcite .
one key diagnostic is explosion geometry .
a global asphericity of sn ejecta will manifest itself through two main spectropolarimetric signatures .
first , there will be significant polarization in spectral regions not dominated by line opacity .
for sne ii - p , this includes the broad spectral region 68008200 .
strong emission lines should generally be unpolarized , since directional information is lost as photons are absorbed and reemitted in a line @xcite ( see , however , * ? ? ?
finally , polarization increases are anticipated in the troughs of strong p - cygni absorption lines .
this results primarily from selective blocking of more forward - scattered and , hence , less polarized , light in the trough regions .
a critical point to bear in mind is that the longer one waits after the explosion , the deeper into the ejecta one can see . for sne ii - p ,
the story unfolds over an extended time period as the photosphere recedes ( in mass coordinates ) back through the ejecta as the hydrogen recombination front progresses from the outside inwards through the thick hydrogen envelope .
the transition from the opaque , `` photospheric '' phase to the transparent , `` nebular phase '' is signaled by the sudden drop in luminosity that marks the end of the photometric plateau . in initial studies ,
sne ii - p were found to have minimal intrinsic polarizations at the generally early times at which they were observed .
low - contrast line features were sometimes seen in the data , but no obvious strong continuum polarization was found ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) ; for a recent review of sn spectropolarimetry of all types , see @xcite .
the situation changed dramatically with observations of sn 2004dj , however , for which a sudden `` spike '' in polarization was seen during the steepest part of the descent off of the plateau @xcite .
using existing models @xcite , it was concluded that the late onset of the polarization suggested a fundamentally non - spherical explosion , with the asphericity cloaked at early times by the massive , opaque , hydrogen envelope .
an obvious observational question presented itself : was sn 2004dj a unique ( or rare ) event ? or , would other similarly well - observed sne ii - p display similar behavior ?
@xcite and @xcite provide partial answers from analysis of four additional sne ii - p : three ( sne 2006my , 2006ov , and 2007aa ) exhibit large , late - time ( end of photometric plateau and beyond ; ) polarization @xcite , while one ( sn 2004et ) exhibits strong and temporally increasing polarization that began at least three months before the end of its plateau phase @xcite .
detailed comparison of these datasets with that of sn 2004dj is hindered , however , by modest temporal sampling or phase coverage .
here we show initial results from our program to obtain critically sampled spectropolarimetry of sne ii - p with the european southern observatory very large telescope .
figure 1 presents nine spectropolarimetric epochs for our most well observed sn ii - p , sn 2008bk , along with the data of sn 2004dj from @xcite . unlike the case for sn 2004dj ,
sn 2008bk was strongly polarized well _ before _ the end of the plateau ( much like sn 2004et ) , with the level rising through the plateau . despite the different temporal behavior ,
it is intriguing that at the point of maximum recorded polarization ( i.e. , day 31 with respect to the end of the plateau for sn 2004dj and day -21 for sn 2008bk ) the spectropolarimetric _ signatures _ of sn 2008bk are virtually identical to those of sn 2004dj .
this similarity may suggest a common cause or , at least , geometry . following the plateau drop - off
, the polarization of sn 2008bk remains remarkably constant .
in fact , although not shown in figure 1 , the spectropolarimetry from days 9 through 120 post - plateau ( epochs 5 through 9 ) are virtually indistinguishable from one another .
this is quite different from the behavior of sn 2004dj .
-band magnitude of sn 2004dj ; the expected polarization derived from the models of @xcite and discussed in the text is also shown ( filled triangles connected by a dashed line ) . *
bottom : * same as the top , but for sn 2008bk .
note that an interstellar polarization ( isp ) of @xmath0 has been removed from the sn 2004dj data @xcite , whereas no isp has been removed from the sn 2008bk data , because it is estimated to be @xmath1 from the depolarizations seen across strong emission lines ( e.g. , h@xmath2 , ca ii ) at all epochs . ]
we have developed non - local - thermodynamic equilibrium , time - dependent radiative - transfer simulations specifically crafted for sne ii - p @xcite .
the simulations , based on the one - dimensional sn ii - p models of @xcite , compute the expected polarization ( in both lines and continuum ) as a function of time for an asphericity generated by a latitudinal density enhancement .
a significant finding is that temporal polarization changes in sne ii - p do not _ necessarily _ implicate a change in the asymmetry of the ejecta .
for instance , in figure 1 ( top , right ) we include the expected temporal evolution of the continuum polarization for an sn ii - p with an oblate equator - to - pole density enhancement of 1.67 , viewed edge - on .
this model reproduces what is observed for sn 2004dj quite well , with the sudden `` spike '' in polarization now explained not by a dramatic increase in asphericity but , rather , by the sharp reduction in optical depth ( i.e. , fewer electron scatters for outgoing photons ) that occurs at the plateau s end . the post - plateau polarization decline is also reproduced as a consequence of the expected @xmath3 dependence of the ejecta optical depth during the nebular phase @xcite .
while models with a dominant and fixed large - scale asymmetry fit the polarization behavior of sn 2004dj , the substantial early time polarization seen in sn 2008bk ( and sn 2004et ) is not replicated ; in fact , current models with equator - to - pole density enhancements as extreme as 5.0 are unable to produce significant ( i.e. , > 0.1% ) polarization during the mid - plateau @xcite .
the persistent late - time polarization seen in sn 2008bk also presents a modeling challenge .
it is worth noting that , in addition to their spectropolarimetric differences , sne 2008bk , 2004dj , and 2004et also exhibit photometric and spectroscopic differences @xcite , some of which are clearly evident for sn 2004dj and sn 2008bk in figure 1 , such as the rapidity of the plateau drop - off .
these differences may be associated with explosion physics but might also be related to the progenitor s core structure and the @xmath4-mixing properties ( morphology , amount , depth below the hydrogen - rich envelope ; see @xcite ) as well .
it is hoped that with the benefit of further modeling we may begin to connect all of these parameters and develop a consistent interpretation of the asymmetries indicated by the polarization of sne ii - p .
we thank for bruno leibundgut , stephane blondin , tom matheson , robert kirshner , malcom hicken , and brian schmidt for assistance with the observations .
dcl acknowledges support from nsf grant ast-1009571 , under which part of this research was carried out .
based on observations collected at the european organisation for astronomical research in the southern hemisphere , chile , under observing programs 081.d-0128 , 082.d-0151 , and 085.d-0391 ( pi : dessart ) . | spectropolarimetry early - time sn geometry young sn atmosphere dominated by electron scattering highly polarizing unresolved source spherical distribution scattering electrons directional electric vectors photons cancel zero net linear polarization asymmetry in distribution electrons or absorbing material results in incomplete cancellation produces net polarization type ii - plateau supernovae - core - collapse events from isolated red supergiant stars mechanism stellar explosion debate key diagnostic is explosion geometry global asphericity of sn ejecta through two spectropolarimetric signatures significant polarization in spectral regions not dominated by line opacity sne ii - p includes broad spectral region 68008200 strong emission lines unpolarized directional information lost as photons absorbed reemitted polarization increases in troughs of strong p - cygni absorption lines results from selective blocking of forward - scattered less polarized light in trough regions longer after explosion deeper into ejectasne ii - p story unfolds extended photosphere recedes through ejecta hydrogen recombination front progresses inwards through hydrogen envelope transition from opaque photospheric to transparent nebular phase signaled by sudden drop in luminosity end of photometric plateau initial studies sne ii - p minimal intrinsic polarizations at early times low - contrast line features sometimes seen no strong continuum polarization recent review see @xcite situation changed with observations sn 2004dj sudden spike in polarization seen during steepest descent off plateau @xcite concluded late onset polarization suggested non - spherical explosion asphericity cloaked by opaque hydrogen envelope observational question was sn 2004dj unique event ? other sne ii - p display similar behavior ? @xcite provide partial answers from analysis of four additional sne ii - p three ( 2006my 2006ov 2007aa exhibit large late - time polarization one ( sn 2004et ) exhibits strong temporally increasing polarization began three months before end plateau phasecomparison datasets with sn 2004dj hindered by modest temporal sampling initial results from program spectropolarimetry of sne ii - p with european southern observatory large telescope figure 1 presents nine spectropolarimetric epochs for sn ii - p , sn 2008bk data sn 2004dj from @xcite unlike sn 2004dj sn 2008bk strongly polarized before end plateau like level rising through plateau different temporal behavior at maximum polarization day 31 day -21 for sn 2008bk spectropolarimetric signatures of sn 2008bk virtually identical to sn 2004dj similarity common cause or geometry following plateau drop - off polarization of sn 2008bk remains constant spectropolarimetry from days 9 through 120 post - plateau epochs 5 through 9 virtually indistinguishable different from behavior sn 2004dj magnitude sn 2004dj expected polarization from models @xcite shown same for sn 2008bk interstellar polarization of @xmath0 removed from sn 2004dj data no isp removed from sn 2008bk data estimated to be @xmath1 from depolarizations across strong emission lines h@xmath2 epochs developed non - local - thermodynamic equilibrium time - dependent radiative - transfer simulations for sne ii - p @xcite compute expected polarization function of time for asphericity latitudinal density enhancement temporal polarization changes in sne ii - p implicate change asymmetry ejecta figure 1 expected temporal evolution of continuum polarization for sn ii - p with oblate equator - to - pole density enhancement of 1.67 model reproduces sn 2004dj sudden spike in polarization explained not by increase asphericity reduction in optical depth at plateau s end post - plateau polarization decline expected @xmath3 dependence of ejecta optical depth during nebular phasemodels large - scale asymmetry fit polarization sn 2004dj early time polarization in sn 2008bk sn 2004et not replicated current models equator - to - pole density enhancements 5.0 produce significant > 0.1% polarization during mid - plateau @xcite persistent late - time polarization in sn 2008bk presents modeling challenge differences sne 2008bk 2004dj 2004et exhibit photometric spectroscopic differences @xcite evident sn 2004dj 2008bk figure 1 rapidity plateau drop - off differences explosion physics progenitor s core structure @xmath4-mixing properties hoped further modeling connect parameters develop consistent interpretation asymmetries polarization sne ii - p thank bruno leibundgut stephane blondin tom matheson robert kirshner malcom hicken brian schmidt assistance observations support nsf grant ast-1009571 research carried out based observations european organisation astronomical research southern hemisphere chile observing programs 081.d-0128 082.d-0151 085.d-0391 | 0.319212 | 1,942 | 963 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,566 | the critical star formation rate density required to keep the intergalactic hydrogen ionised depends crucially on the average rate of recombinations in the intergalactic medium ( igm ) .
this rate is proportional to the clumping factor @xmath0 , where @xmath1 and @xmath2 are the local and cosmic mean baryon density , respectively and the brackets @xmath3 indicate spatial averaging over the recombining gas in the igm .
we perform a suite of cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations that include radiative cooling to calculate the volume - weighted clumping factor of the igm at redshifts @xmath4 .
we focus on the effect of photo - ionisation heating by a uniform ultra - violet background and find that photo - heating strongly reduces the clumping factor because the increased pressure support smoothes out small - scale density fluctuations .
photo - ionisation heating is often said to provide a negative feedback on the reionisation of the igm because it suppresses the cosmic star formation rate by boiling the gas out of low - mass halos .
however , because of the reduction of the clumping factor it also makes it easier to keep the igm ionised .
photo - heating therefore also provides a positive feedback which , while known to exist , has received much less attention . we demonstrate that this positive feedback is in fact very strong .
using conservative assumptions , we find that if the igm was reheated at @xmath5 , the observed population of star - forming galaxies at @xmath6 may be sufficient to keep the igm ionised , provided that the fraction of ionising photons that escape the star - forming regions to ionise the igm is larger than @xmath7 .
[ firstpage ] cosmology : theory - methods : numerical - hydrodynamics - radiative transfer - intergalactic medium - galaxies : formation | the absence of a gunn - peterson trough in the majority of the observed absorption spectra towards high - redshift quasars suggests that the reionisation of intergalactic hydrogen was completed at a redshift @xmath8 ( see @xcite for a recent review ) and that it remained highly ionised ever since .
current observational estimates of the ultra - violet ( uv ) luminosity density at redshifts @xmath9 ( e.g. @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ) , on the other hand , may imply star formation rate ( sfr ) densities several times lower than the critical sfr density required to keep the intergalactic medium ( igm ) ionised ( but see , e.g. , @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ) .
taken at face value , these low sfr densities pose a severe challenge to commonly employed theoretical models in which the observed population of star - forming galaxies is the only source of ionising radiation in the high - redshift universe .
there are , however , large uncertainties associated with both the observationally inferred ( see , e.g. , the comprehensive analysis of @xcite ) and the critical sfr densities . the critical sfr density , @xmath10 here rescaled to match the most recent wmap estimate for the cosmic baryon density ( @xcite ) , has been derived by @xcite using an early version of the @xcite population synthesis code , assuming a salpeter initial stellar mass function ( imf ) and solar metallicity .
it results from simply equating the spatially averaged rate at which ionising photons are emitted into the igm to the spatially averaged rate at which the intergalactic gas recombines .
[ eq : criticalsfr ] is therefore incapable of addressing a number of potentially important physical effects .
some ionising photons will , for instance , redshift below the ionisation threshold before ionising and some ionising photons will have been emitted longer than a recombination time ago upon impact with a neutral atom , so that equating instantaneous rates is not appropriate and one even may have to take source evolution into account .
it is therefore important to keep in mind that eq .
[ eq : criticalsfr ] is likely only accurate within factors of a few .
the critical sfr is inversely proportional to the escape fraction @xmath11 , i.e. the fraction of ionising photons produced by star - forming galaxies that escape the interstellar medium ( ism ) to ionise the igm , and proportional to the average recombination rate in the igm .
the latter is parametrised using the dimensionless clumping factor @xmath12 , where @xmath1 is the baryon density , @xmath13 is the mean baryon density of the universe and the brackets @xmath3 indicate spatial averaging over the gas constituting the recombining igm . under the assumption of a uniformly ionised igm ,
the clumping factor expresses the spatially averaged number of recombinations occurring per unit time and unit volume in the ionised igm , relative to that in gas at the cosmic mean density @xmath13 .
a larger escape fraction implies a smaller critical sfr density , as more photons are available to ionise the igm . on the other hand , a larger clumping factor implies a larger critical sfr density since more ionising photons are required to compensate for the increased number of recombinations .
most observational studies that compare ( @xcite ) . ]
the sfr density derived from estimates of the uv luminosity density at redshift @xmath6 to the critical sfr density assume an escape fraction @xmath14 and a clumping factor @xmath15 .
while a variety of both observational and theoretical studies ( e.g. @xcite and references therein ; @xcite ; @xcite ) have ruled out larger escape fractions , the estimate for the clumping factor comes from a single cosmological simulation performed more than 10 years ago ( @xcite ) .
it is on the basis of these values for the escape fraction and the clumping factor that the observed population of galaxies has been found to be incapable of keeping the intergalactic hydrogen ionised , forming massive stars at a rate which is up to an order of magnitude lower than required by eq .
[ eq : criticalsfr ] .
it has been pointed out that this discrepancy between the inferred and critical sfr densities could be resolved if the employed clumping factor were too high ( e.g. @xcite ; see also the discussion in @xcite ) . indeed , in most ( but not all ) of the more recent theoretical theoretical studies ( e.g. @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ) significantly lower clumping factors were derived .
on the other hand , it is sometimes emphasised that simulations underestimate the clumping factor , due to a lack of resolution ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . in this work
we perform a set of cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics ( sph ) simulations that include radiative cooling and photo - ionisation by a uniform uv background in the optically thin limit to study the clumping factor of the igm .
we focus on the effect of photo - ionisation heating on the evolution of the clumping factor .
previous investigations of the impact of photo - heating on the reionisation of the igm have almost exclusively come to the conclusion that it acts as to provide a negative feedback .
photo - heating boils the gas out of the potential wells of dark matter ( dm ) halos with virial temperatures @xmath16 ( e.g. @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ) .
this inhibits the formation of stars in these low - mass halos and thus decreases the ionising emissivity , which makes it more difficult to reionise the universe .
the same mechanism that reduces the number of ionising photons that are emitted into the igm does , however , also affect the evolution of the clumping factor ( e.g. @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ; @xcite ) . in this paper
we demonstrate that photo - heating significantly lowers the clumping factor and hence the average recombination rate in the igm .
while photo - ionisation heating undoubtedly impedes the production of ionising photons , our results imply that it also makes it much easier to keep the igm ionised .
the paper is structured as follows . in section [ sec : simulations ] we give a detailed description of our set of simulations . in section [ sec : results ] we use our simulations to compute the clumping factor of the igm . finally , in section [ sec : conclusions ]
, we discuss our results and their implications for the value of the critical sfr density .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] @xcite provided a convenient four - parameter fit to the volume - weighted probability density function ( pdf ) of the gas density at redshifts @xmath17 and @xmath18 obtained from the l10 hydrodynamical simulation described in @xcite .
in addition , they provided a prescription for extrapolating this fit to higher redshifts .
here we compare the volume - weighted pdf obtained from our default simulation ( _ r9l6n256 _ ) at @xmath19 to their fit . because we find that their set of fitting parameters provides a somewhat poor description of this pdf
, we also provide an updated set of parameters that yields a fit which more accurately describes the one - point distribution of gas densities at @xmath19 in our default simulation . in fig .
[ fig : pdf : fit ] we show the volume - weighted pdf of the gas density per unit @xmath20 .
we have investigated the convergence of this pdf with respect to the resolution and the size of the simulation box , using the same set of simulations that we employed to study the convergence of the clumping factor in section [ sec : convergence ] .
we find that the pdf is converged with respect to changes in the resolution .
it is converged with respect to changes in the size of the simulation box for overdensities @xmath21 . for larger overdensities ,
the values of the pdf obtained from our default simulation may not yet be fully converged .
we note that at @xmath19 the pdfs obtained from the simulations _
r[@xmath22l6n256z _ that employ a reheating redshift @xmath23 are almost undistinguishable from that obtained from our default simulation .
we compare the pdf to the fit given by @xcite , @xmath24 \delta^{-\beta } d\delta , \label{eq : pdf : fit}\ ] ] using their values for the parameters . ]
@xmath25 and @xmath26 .
as can be seen from fig .
[ fig : pdf : fit ] , for overdensities @xmath27 the pdf obtained from our default simulation is significantly steeper than predicted by the fit . using the simulations _
r9l6n256w3 _ and _ r9l6n256w1 _ , we verified that the steepness of the slope of the pdf over this range of overdensities is sensitive to the cosmological parameters employed .
note that the pdf does also not asymptote to @xmath28 , as predicted by eq .
[ eq : pdf : fit ] . for overdensities larger than the overdensity for the onset of star formation , the pdf is instead governed by the effective equation of state characteristic for the multi - phase star - forming gas .
we fitted eq .
[ eq : pdf : fit ] to our pdf over the range @xmath29 , constraining the parameters @xmath30 and @xmath31 by the requirement that the total integral over the volume- and mass - weighted pdf must be normalized to unity .
this yields values @xmath32 and @xmath33 .
note that the fit based on these parameter values still does not provide a good description of the pdf for overdensities @xmath34 .
( per unit @xmath20 ) at @xmath19 obtained from our default simulation _ r9l6n256 _
( black solid histogram ) . for comparison ,
the red solid line shows the four - parameter fit given by eq .
[ eq : pdf : fit ] , with the parameter values taken from @xcite .
the blue dashed line shows our best fit of eq .
[ eq : pdf : fit ] to the pdf .
bottom panel : absolute value of the relative differences of the fits with respect to the pdf . in both panels ,
the vertical line indicates the overdensity corresponding to the onset of star formation .
, scaledwidth=49.0% ] | absence of gunn - peterson trough in observed absorption spectra towards high - redshift quasars suggests reionisation of intergalactic hydrogen completed at redshift @xmath8 remained highly ionised since current estimates of ultra - violet uv ) luminosity density at redshifts @xmath9 @xcite may imply star formation rate ( sfr densities lower than critical sfr density required to keep intergalactic medium ionised low sfr densities pose to theoretical models star - forming galaxies only source of ionising radiation in high - redshift universe large uncertainties with observationally inferred and critical sfr densities critical sfr density @xmath10 rescaled to match recent wmap estimate for cosmic baryon density ( @xcite ) derived by @xcite using population synthesis code assuming salpeter initial stellar mass function solar metallicity results from equating spatially averaged rate ionising photons emitted into igm to intergalactic gas criticalsfr incapable of addressing important physical effectsionising photons redshift below ionisation threshold before ionising emitted longer than recombination upon impact with neutral atom equating instantaneous rates not appropriate may source evolution eq criticalsfr accurate within factors few critical sfr proportional to escape fraction @xmath11 ionising photons proportional to average recombination rate parametrised using dimensionless clumping factor @xmath12 @xmath1 baryon density @xmath13 mean baryon density universe brackets @xmath3 indicate spatial averaging over gas recombining igm uniformly ionised igm clumping factor expresses averaged number of recombinations per unit time unit volume in ionised igm relative to cosmic mean density @xmath13 larger escape fraction implies smaller critical sfr density more photons ionise larger clumping factor implies larger critical sfr density more ionising photons compensate for increased recombinations observational studies compare sfr density uv luminosity density at redshift @xmath6 to critical sfr density assume escape fraction @xmath14 clumping factor @xmath15 studies@xcite references ruled out larger escape fractions estimate for clumping factor from single cosmological simulation 10 years ago basis values for escape fraction clumping factor observed population galaxies found incapable of keeping intergalactic hydrogen ionised forming massive stars at rate up to order of magnitude lower than required by eq . criticalsfr ] discrepancy between inferred critical sfr densities could be resolved if clumping factor too high ( @xcite in most not recent theoretical studies lower clumping factors derived sometimes simulations underestimate clumping factor due to lack of resolution see @xcite ) in this work perform cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations include radiative cooling photo - ionisation by uniform uv background in optically thin limit to study clumping factor igm focus on effect of photo - ionisation heating on evolution clumping factor previous investigations impact photo - heating on reionisation igm negative feedback photo - heating boils gas out of potential wells of dark matter dm ) halos with virial temperatures@xcite ; inhibits formation of stars in low - mass halos decreases ionising emissivity makes difficult to reionise universe mechanism reduces ionising photons emitted into igm evolution of clumping factor ( @xcite paper photo - heating lowers clumping factor average recombination rate in igm photo - ionisation heating impedes production of ionising photons results imply makes easier to keep igm ionised paper structured in section [ sec : simulations ] detailed description of simulations section [ : results ] use simulations to compute clumping factor igm section conclusions ] discuss results implications for value critical sfr density @xcite provided four - parameter fit to volume - weighted probability density function pdf of gas density at redshifts @xmath17 and @xmath18 from l10 hydrodynamical simulation @xcite provided prescription for extrapolating fit to higher redshifts compare volume - weighted pdf from our default simulation at @xmath19 to their fit their set fitting parameters poor description of pdf provide updated set parameters fit describes one - point distribution gas densities at @xmath19 in default simulation fig . pdf volume - weighted pdf of gas density per unit @xmath20 investigated convergence pdf with resolution size simulation box using same simulations convergence clumping factor pdf converged with changes resolution size simulation box for overdensities @xmath21 for larger overdensities values pdf default simulation may not be fully converged at @xmath19 pdfs from simulations@xmath22l6n256z reheating redshift @xmath23 almost undistinguishable from default simulation compare pdf to fit by @xcite , @xmath24\delta\beta d\delta{eq : pdf : fit using values for parameters @xmath25 @xmath26 fig for overdensities @xmath27 pdf from default simulation significantly steeper than predicted fit using simulations r9l6n256w3 r9l6n256w1 verified steepness slope pdf over overdensities sensitive to cosmological parameters pdf not asymptote to @xmath28 as predicted by eq pdf fitoverdensities larger than onset star formation pdf governed by equation state characteristic multi - phase star - forming gas fitted eq . pdf pdf over range @xmath29 constraining parameters @xmath30 @xmath31 total integral volume mass pdf normalized to unity yields values @xmath32 @xmath33 fit values good description pdf for overdensities @xmath34 per unit @xmath20 ) @xmath19 obtained from default simulation r9l6n256 red solid line shows four - parameter fit eq . pdf parameter values from @xcite blue dashed line shows best fit of eq . bottom panel absolute value relative differences fits pdf vertical line indicates overdensity onset star formation scaledwidth=49.0% | 0.355572 | 2,381 | 1,176 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,568 | we examine the stability of minimal dark matter ( mdm ) particle - candidates in the setup in which they participate in radiative neutrino ( r@xmath0 ) masses .
we first point out the existence of an additional renormalizable term in recently proposed r@xmath0mdm lagrangian , which violates the claimed accidental @xmath1 symmetry and spoils the stability of the fermionic mdm quintuplet component .
we then explore the viability of r@xmath0mdm variants based on scalar mdm multiplets .
there are ubiquitous super - renormalizable terms in the scalar potential which make these scalar multiplets unstable .
= 2 * * * * + = 0.5 kreimir kumeriki , ivica picek and branimir radovi + _ department of physics , faculty of science , university of zagreb , p.o.b .
331 , hr-10002 zagreb , croatia + _
+ _ pacs _ : 14.60.pq ; 14.60.st ; 95.35.+d ; 14.80.cp + _ keywords _ : neutrino mass ; exotic leptons ; dark matter ; non - standard scalar fields | there are two experimental pieces of evidence @xcite pressing us to extend the standard model ( sm ) : the evidence for neutrino masses and for the dark matter ( dm ) content of the universe .
the ongoing experiments at the large hadron collider ( lhc ) may provide us with new insights on new heavy particles enabling weinberg s dimension - five operator @xmath2 @xcite as an explanation of the smallness of masses of observed neutrinos .
the known tree level realizations of weinberg s operator proceed by adding to the particle content of the sm a single , gut - scale multiplet : a heavy fermion singlet for the type - i @xcite , a scalar triplet for the type - ii @xcite and a fermion triplet for the type - iii @xcite seesaw mechanism . on the other hand additional discrete symmetries are instrumental @xcite in bringing the seesaw mechanism to the tev scale accessible at the lhc .
alternative lowering of the seesaw scale , without discrete symmetries , can be achieved either by going beyond dimension - five operator or by generating the neutrino masses at the loop level .
the approach used by two recent models is to employ non - zero hypercharge seesaw mediators : the dimension - seven mechanism with fermion triplets in @xcite and the dimension - nine mechanism with fermion quintuplets in @xcite .
both of these mechanisms offer the spectacular triply - charged states verifiable at the lhc .
the approach in @xcite , which we follow here , is to link a dm candidate to the scale of radiatively generated neutrino ( r@xmath0 ) masses .
the authors of @xcite exemplify it by employing a 10 tev scale fermionic quintuplet of zero hypercharge .
let us stress that an isolated @xmath3 fermion field or an isolated septuplet @xmath4 scalar field have been singeld out as viable dm particle candidates within the so - called minimal dark matter ( mdm ) model @xcite .
the dubbed r@xmath0mdm model @xcite claims to achieve the stability of the neutral mdm quintuplet component without introducing a symmetry beyond the sm gauge symmetries , on account of an accidental @xmath1 symmetry arising from the choice of the field content .
it has been adopted in more recent paper @xcite aimed at successful leptogenesis . from the point of generating the neutrino masses
, the fermion quintuplet has to be accompanied by an appropriate scalar multiplet .
high enough scalar field multiplet @xcite avoids the terms in the scalar potential which may lead to and induced vacuum expectation value ( vev ) of the new scalar field , and there are only radiative neutrino masses .
this r@xmath0mdm is realized by accompanying the zero hypercharge quintuplets @xmath3 by a hypercharge one sextuplets , @xmath5 , proposing the neutral component @xmath6 as fermionic dm candidate . in section 2
we give a brief description of this attempt and explicate a previously omitted term in the scalar potential , which spoils the stability of @xmath6 particle . in section 3
we analyze two new seesaw models , the first in which a tentative dm particle appears as a neutral component of the scalar quintuplet @xmath7 , accompanied by a quadruplet seesaw mediator @xmath8 . in the second model
we show that originally viable mdm scalar septuplet @xmath4 candidate also becomes unstable in the context of generating radiative neutrino masses .
we summarize our results in the concluding section .
to allow a yukawa coupling of the isospin two fermion @xmath3 to the lepton doublet @xmath9 , necessary for a mass generation mechanism , @xmath10 one has to introduce a scalar field @xmath11 of a half - integer ( 3/2 or 5/2 ) isospin in addition to the sm higgs @xmath12 . in order to avoid a vev of @xmath11 which might come from quartic @xmath13 term
, the fermionic quintuplet @xmath3 has to be accompanied by a sextuplet scalar @xmath14 as in @xcite .
these authors have argued that the neutral component of the fermionic quintuplet , @xmath6 , can be a dm candidate on account of an accidental @xmath1 symmetry of the lagrangian .
we show that it is a viable dm candidate only if one forbids or finetunes a renormalizable @xmath15 term with the quartic coupling @xmath16 , omitted in @xcite . in their tensor notation ,
the omitted term reads @xmath17 and it can induce a rapid decay of a dm particle at the loop level .
for example , the loop diagram on fig .
[ decay ] generates an effective dimension - six operator @xmath18 which leads to decays of the dm candidate @xmath6 .
in particular , we estimate the decay amplitude for @xmath19 arising from it , @xmath20 at the loop level . ]
it produces the decay width into four final - state particles , @xmath21 which is given by @xmath22 the inverse of it , a lifetime of a dm candidate , should be longer then the age of the universe given by the hubble time @xmath23 . for @xmath6 to have the lifetime @xmath24
, the quartic coupling @xmath16 has to be tiny . by taking @xmath25 , @xmath26 and @xmath27 ,
the values adopted from @xcite , we obtain @xmath28 as an upper limit
. in the context of the decaying dm @xcite the bound on the @xmath29 can be nine orders of magnitude larger ( @xmath30 ) , implaying even stronger limit , @xmath31 .
this means that @xmath6 is a viable dm candidate only if the coupling in eq .
( [ dim4 ] ) has an extremely small value .
this is in contradiction with the claim in @xcite , and in order to avoid the fine - tuning one has to impose the @xmath1 symmetry forbidding the renormalizable term in eq .
( [ dim4 ] ) , by hand . without such discrete symmetry
a model more minimal than in @xcite is possible with scalar quadruplet @xmath32 replacing previous sextuplet field .
like in case of previously studied non - zero hypercharge fermion @xcite , this field @xmath11 develops an induced vev from the quartic @xmath33 term .
the yukawa terms result in a tree - level dimension - nine seesaw operator .
these and additional contributions to the neutrino masses from radiative loop - suppressed diagrams are presented in a separate paper @xcite .
in the light of the described blow to fermionic mdm candidate in the radiative neutrino masses setup , let us now reconsider the scalar mdm multiplets @xcite .
the models involving hypercharge - zero scalar field in radiatively generating neutrino masses through diagrams displayed on fig .
[ mnuloop ] have two essential features : ( i ) the scalar field is accompanied with appropriate fermion multiplet ; ( ii ) there are two scalar fields of different hypercharge in play , the one with hypercharge zero being the dm candidate . a minimal possibility to realize the diagram on fig .
[ mnuloop ] through the scalar quintuplet @xmath34 as mdm candidate is to accompany it with another scalar quintuplet @xmath35 in conjunction with non - zero hypercharge fermionic quadruplet @xmath8 as the seesaw mediator . with two scalars @xmath34 and @xmath35
, there are , up to our knowledge previously unconsidered , dimension - three @xmath1 noninvariant operators in the lagrangian @xmath36 which in tensor notation read @xmath37 these terms make the dm candidate @xmath38 unstable through loop diagrams like the one on fig .
[ decay2 ] .
we estimate the amplitude for the decay @xmath39 @xmath40 and the decay width @xmath41 to have the lifetime of a dm candidate @xmath24 , the parameters @xmath42 in eq .
( [ scalar5 ] ) have to have very small values , @xmath43 .
decays . ] the second possibility to realize the diagram on fig .
[ mnuloop ] is through the scalar septuplet @xmath44 as mdm , together with another scalar septuplet @xmath45 , now in conjunction with fermionic sextuplet @xmath46 . for a single scalar septuplet @xmath47 ,
the term @xmath48 is forbidden by bose statistics @xcite , but in presence of another septuplet @xmath49 there is the dimension - three @xmath1 noninvariant operator @xmath50 making the dm candidate @xmath38 unstable . decays . ]
these terms make the dm candidate @xmath38 unstable through loop diagrams , like the one on fig .
[ decay3 ] .
we estimate the amplitude for the decay @xmath51 @xmath52 and the decay width @xmath53 to have the lifetime of a dm candidate @xmath24 , the parameter @xmath54 in eq .
( [ dim3 ] ) is restricted to very small value , @xmath55 .
to conclude , a major blow to scalar r@xmath0mdm variants comes from super - renormalizable dimension - three @xmath56 operators . besides these renormalizable @xmath1 violating operators , there are possible effects from the planck scale considered in @xcite and references therein .
we address in a common framework the open questions of the neutrino masses and the dark matter content of the universe . in view of the immense dm possibilities
, a minimality of the dm model appears as a criterion essential for its predictivity and testability .
the minimality is satisfied by adding only one extra @xmath57 multiplet in the mdm setup . however , by imposing additional seesaw mission to a given mdm multiplet , it has to be accompanied by additional scalar field introducing new obstacles to the dm stability .
it would be appealing if the dm candidate , a neutral component of a certain higher weak - isospin multiplet , could be stabilized without introducing a symmetry beyond the sm gauge symmetries , as claimed in @xcite .
we have shown that this is not possible for already selected mdm particles , if the neutrino masses are generated through simple one - loop diagrams on fig .
[ mnuloop ] .
the obstacle for the fermionic quintuplet mdm candidate in @xcite comes from renormalizable quartic term omitted there . concerning the scalar r@xmath0mdm variants , we have shown that the stability of the scalar quintuplet and septuplet mdm candidate is violated by ubiquitous super - renormalizable terms that can be tamed only by imposing extra discrete symmetry .
p. minkowski , _
mu @xmath58 e gamma at a rate of one out of 1-billion muon decays ? _ , phys .
b * 67 * , 421 ( 1977 ) ; t. yanagida , in _ proceedings of the workshop on unified theory and the baryon number of the universe _ , eds . o. sawada and a. sugamoto ( kek , tsukuba , 1979 ) , p. 95 ; m. gell - mann , p. ramond , and r. slansky , in _ supergravity _ , edited by p. van nieuwenhuizen and d. freedman ( north holland , amsterdam , 1979 ) , p. 315 ;
glashow , in _ quarks and leptons _ , edited by m. l@xmath59vy _ et al .
_ ( plenum , new york , 1980 ) , p. 707 ;
mohapatra and g. senjanovi , _ neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation _ ,
* 44 * , 912 ( 1980 ) .
w. konetschny and w. kummer , _ nonconservation of total lepton number with scalar bosons _
b * 70 * , 433 ( 1977 ) ; m. magg and c. wetterich , _ neutrino mass problem and gauge hierarchy _ ,
b * 94 * , 61 ( 1980 ) ; j. schechter and j.w.f .
neutrino masses in su(2)@xmath60u(1 ) theories _ , phys .
d * 22 * , 2227 ( 1980 ) ; t.p .
cheng and l.f .
li , _ neutrino masses , mixings , and oscillations in su(2)@xmath60u(1 ) models of electroweak interactions _ , phys .
d * 22 * , 2860 ( 1980 ) ; g. lazarides , q. shafi , and c. wetterich , _ proton lifetime and fermion masses in an so(10 ) model _ , nucl .
b * 181 * , 287 ( 1981 ) ; r.n .
mohapatra and g. senjanovi , _ neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation _
, phys . rev .
d * 23 * , 165 ( 1981 ) .
m. cirelli , n. fornengo and a. strumia , _ minimal dark matter _ , nucl .
b * 753 * , 178 ( 2006 ) [ hep - ph/0512090 ] ; m. cirelli and a. strumia , _ minimal dark matter : model and results _
d * 80 * , 071702 ( 2009 ) [ 0905.2710 [ hep - ph ] ] . | two experimental evidence extend standard model neutrino masses dark matter content universe experiments at large hadron collider may provide new insights on heavy particles weinberg s dimension - five operator explanation smallness of masses observed neutrinos tree level realizations weinberg s operator adding particle content sm single - scale multiplet heavy fermion singlet i scalar triplet fermion triplet additional discrete symmetries instrumental seesaw mechanism to tev scale lhc alternative lowering seesaw scale without discrete symmetries beyond dimension - five operator or generating neutrino masses at loop level approach models non - zero hypercharge seesaw mediators dimension - seven fermion triplets dimension - nine fermion quintuplets offer triply - charged states verifiable at lhc approach in @xcite link dm candidate to scale radiatively generated neutrino masses authors 10 tev scale fermionic quintuplet of zero hypercharge isolated @xmath3 fermion field or septuplet @xmath4 scalar field singeld out as viable dm particle candidates within minimal dark matter model @xciter@xmath0mdm model stability neutral mdm quintuplet without symmetry beyond sm gauge symmetries accidental @xmath1 symmetry field content adopted in recent paper successful leptogenesis generating neutrino masses fermion quintuplet appropriate scalar multiplet high scalar field multiplet avoids terms scalar potential vacuum expectation radiative neutrino masses zero hypercharge quintuplets @xmath3 by hypercharge one sextuplets @xmath5 neutral component @xmath6 as fermionic dm candidate section 2 description omitted term scalar potential stability @xmath6 particle section 3 two new seesaw models first tentative dm particle neutral component scalar quintuplet @xmath7 quadruplet seesaw mediator @xmath8 second viable mdm scalar septuplet @xmath4 candidate unstable generating radiative neutrino masses summarize results concluding section coupling isospin two fermion @xmath3 to lepton doublet @xmath9 mass generation scalar field @xmath11 half - integer ( 3/2 or 5/2 ) isospin sm higgs @xmath12 avoid vev @xmath11 from quartic @xmath13 term fermionic quintuplet @xmath3 sextuplet scalar @xmath14 @xcite authors argued neutral component fermionic quintuplet @xmath6 dm candidate accidental @xmath1 symmetry lagrangian viable dm candidate if forbids renormalizable @xmath15 term quartic coupling @xmath16 omitted @xcite omitted term reads @xmath17 rapid decay dm particle loop level loop diagram fig decay generates dimension - six operator @xmath18 leads decays dm candidate @xmath6 estimate decay amplitude @xmath19 loop level decay width four final - state particles @xmath21 lifetime dm candidate longer then age universe hubble time @xmath23 @xmath6 lifetime @xmath24 quartic coupling @xmath16 tiny @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 values adopted from @xcite obtain @xmath28 upper limit decaying dm @xcite bound @xmath29 nine orders magnitude larger @xmath30 ) stronger limit @xmath31 @xmath6 viable dm candidate if coupling eq small value contradiction with claim @xcite avoid fine - tuning impose @xmath1 symmetry forbidding renormalizable term in without symmetry model minimal @xcite possible with scalar quadruplet @xmath32 replacing previous sextuplet field non - zero hypercharge fermion field @xmath11 develops induced vev from quartic @xmath33 term yukawa terms result tree - level dimension - nine seesaw operator contributions to from radiative loop - suppressed diagrams separate paper @xcite fermionic mdm reconsider scalar mdm multiplets @xcite models hypercharge - zero scalar field generating neutrino masses scalar field accompanied with fermion multiplet two scalar fields different hypercharge one with hypercharge zero dm candidate minimal possibility to realize diagram scalar quintuplet @xmath34 accompany with scalar quintuplet @xmath35 non - zero hypercharge fermionic quadruplet @xmath8 seesaw mediatortwo scalars @xmath34 dimension - three @xmath1 noninvariant operators in lagrangian @xmath36 @xmath37 make dm candidate @xmath38 unstable loop diagrams estimate amplitude decay @xmath39 decay width @xmath41 lifetime dm candidate @xmath24 parameters @xmath42 small values @xmath43 second possibility diagram scalar septuplet @xmath44 mdm septuplet @xmath45 fermionic sextuplet @xmath46 single scalar septuplet @xmath47 term @xmath48 forbidden by bose statistics another septuplet @xmath49 dimension - three @xmath1 noninvariant operator @xmath50 dm candidate @xmath38 unstable terms make dm candidate @xmath38 unstable loop diagrams estimate amplitude decay @xmath51 @xmath52 decay width @xmath53 lifetime of dm candidate @xmath24 parameter @xmath54 restricted small value @xmath55 major blow to scalar r@xmath0mdm variants from super - renormalizable dimension - three @xmath56 operatorsrenormalizable @xmath1 violating operators possible effects from planck scale in @xcite neutrino masses dark matter content immense dm possibilities minimality dm model essential for predictivity testability minimality satisfied adding one extra @xmath57 multiplet mdm setup imposing additional seesaw mission mdm multiplet additional scalar field dm stability dm candidate neutral component weak - isospin multiplet stabilized without symmetry beyond sm gauge symmetries @xcite not possible for selected mdm particles neutrino masses generated one - loop diagrams obstacle for fermionic quintuplet mdm candidate in @xcite renormalizable quartic term omitted scalar r@xmath0mdm variants stability scalar quintuplet septuplet mdm candidate violated by super - renormalizable terms tamed imposing extra discrete symmetry. minkowski @xmath58 e gamma one out of 1-billion muon decays phys . 67 421 ( 1977 ) t. yanagida proceedings workshop on unified theory baryon number universe sugamoto 1979 p. 95 m. gell - mann p.ramond slansky supergravity edited nieuwenhuizen freedman north holland amsterdam 1979 p. 315 glashow quarks leptons@xmath59vy plenum new york 1980 p. 707 mohapatra g senjanovi neutrino mass spontaneous parity nonconservation 44 912 1980 ) w. konetschny kummer nonconservation total lepton number scalar bosons 433 1977 ) m. magg c. wetterich neutrino mass problem gauge hierarchy 94 61 1980 ) j j.w.f neutrino masses su(2)@xmath60u(1 theories 22 2227 1980 ) cheng l.f li neutrino masses mixings oscillations models electroweak interactions 2860 1980 g. lazarides q. shafi c. wetterich proton lifetime fermion masses so(10 model 181 287 ( 1981 ) mohapatra g. senjanovi neutrino masses mixings gauge models spontaneous parity violation 23 165 ( 1981 ) m. cirelli n. fornengo a. strumia minimal dark matter 753 178 ( 2006 ) ph/0512090 cirellistrumia minimal dark matter model results 071702 2009 0905.2710 hep - ph | 0.496837 | 2,996 | 1,581 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,575 | the double - exchange model , which has been extensively studied in the context of colossal magneto - resistance in perovskite manganese oxides , is known to exhibit a ferromagnetic metallic state at low temperatures because of the interplay between localized moments and itinerant electrons through the hunds - rule coupling . here
we investigate numerically the ferromagnetic transition in the double - exchange model defined on the frustrated pyrochlore lattice as a simple model for ferromagnetic pyrochlore oxides .
we demonstrate that the finite - size corrections are largely reduced by implementing averages over the twisted boundary conditions in the monte carlo simulation , which enables to estimate the ferromagnetic transition temperature in relatively small size clusters .
the estimate is compared with that for the non - frustrated cubic lattice system . | the double - exchange ( de ) model is a minimal model which explicitly incorporates the interplay between itinerant electrons and localized magnetic moments .
the hamiltonian is given by @xmath0 where @xmath1 ( @xmath2 ) is an annihilation ( creation ) operator of an electron with spin @xmath3 at site @xmath4 , @xmath5 is the transfer integral for nearest - neighbor sites @xmath6 , @xmath7 and @xmath8 are spin operators of itinerant electron and localized spin , respectively , which are coupled by the hunds - rule coupling @xmath9 , @xmath10 is the density operator , and @xmath11 is the chemical potential .
the localized spins @xmath8 are treated as classical vectors .
the model was originally introduced by zener @xcite , and has been studied for understanding the physics of perovskite manganese oxides @xcite . in particular ,
the rediscovery of colossal magneto - resistance phenomena have stimulated extensive studies for the de systems , including some extensions of the model such as the super - exchange interaction between localized moments , orbital degeneracy of itinerant electrons , and electron - phonon couplings @xcite .
the model ( [ eq : h ] ) is known to exhibit a ferromagnetic metallic state at low temperature ( @xmath12 ) to gain the kinetic energy of electrons by aligning localized moments in parallel .
this is called the de mechanism @xcite .
there have been many efforts to estimate the ferromagnetic transition temperature @xmath13 @xcite . for the model on the three - dimensional cubic lattice ,
@xmath13 was determined precisely by a large - scale monte carlo simulation : for example , @xmath14 at the electron density @xmath15 in the limit of @xmath16 @xcite . in this contribution
, we present our numerical results for the ferromagnetic transition when the model is defined on the geometrically frustrated lattice structure . among many frustrated lattice structures
, we consider the pyrochlore lattice , which is a three - dimensional network of corner - sharing tetrahedra as shown in fig .
[ fig1](a ) .
one of the experimental motivations is found in a family of mo pyrochlore oxides _
r_@xmath17mo@xmath18o@xmath19 : when the ionic size of rare earth element _ r _ is relatively large such as _ r _ = nd and sm , the compounds become ferromagnetic metal at low @xmath12 @xcite , and it was pointed out by the first principle calculations that the de mechanism plays a key role for this behavior @xcite . as a first step toward the understanding of thermodynamic properties of the pyrochlore systems , below we will investigate the ferromagnetic transition by monte carlo calculations for the simplest case , i.e. , the model ( [ eq : h ] ) in the limit of @xmath16 .
we employ a monte carlo method to take account of large fluctuations in the frustrated system .
the method is a standard one in which configurations of classical localized spins are sampled by monte carlo procedure ; the monte carlo weight is calculated by the exact diagonalization of the fermion hamiltonian matrix for a given spin configuration .
the bottleneck of the calculations is the exact diagonalization , which usually limits the accessible system sizes to several hundreds sites .
an improved method based on the polynomial expansion of the density of states was developed by the authors @xcite , but for frustrated systems , in general , the method becomes less efficient because of singular form of the density of states : indeed , in the present pyrochlore case , the density of states exhibits a @xmath20-functional peak due to two flat bands ( @xmath21 ) as well as two van - hove singularities ( @xmath22 and @xmath23 ) in the non - interacting model as shown in fig . [ fig1](b ) .
therefore we here employ the standard method . to enable systematic analysis within the limited system sizes
, we apply a technique of averaging over the twisted boundary conditions @xcite . in this technique ,
a twisted boundary condition is imposed with replacing the transfer integral @xmath5 by @xmath24 , where @xmath25 denotes a magnetic flux and @xmath26 represents the vector connecting the nearest - neighbor sites @xmath6 .
the average is taken by the integral over @xmath27 , which is approximately calculated by the sum over @xmath28 grid points .
it has been shown that the procedure reduces finite size effects originating from the discreteness of the wave numbers .
it is shown for the model ( [ eq : h ] ) that in the limit of @xmath29 , the averaging procedure for a state of a finite size cluster with a given set of spin configurations provides results for the infinite size system which consists of a periodic array of the finite size cluster .
for example , for the perfectly ordered ferromagnetic state , the averaging procedure with @xmath29 for any finite size cluster gives the exact result in the thermodynamic limit . in order to take this advantage
, we apply the averaging procedure to each monte carlo snapshot for calculating the monte carlo weight .
this corresponds to ensemble average over the independent systems with different boundary conditions . in the following calculations ,
we take the average over the grid points with @xmath30 , where @xmath31 and @xmath32 ( @xmath33 ) . here , @xmath34 and @xmath35 is a linear dimension of the system measured in the cubic unit cell , i.e. , the total number of sites @xmath36 .
we demonstrate here the efficiency of the averaging technique by calculating the electron density @xmath37 as a function of @xmath12 .
we show the monte carlo results at @xmath38 in figs .
[ fig2 ] and [ fig3 ] as an example . in fig .
[ fig2 ] , we present @xmath28 dependence for two different system sizes . in both cases ,
the results converge onto a single curve as increasing @xmath28 .
furthermore , the necessary @xmath28 for the convergence becomes smaller as the system size @xmath39 increases .
figure [ fig3 ] shows @xmath39 dependence with and without taking averages . in the case without taking averages , the results are largely scattered for different system sizes as shown in fig .
[ fig3](a ) .
in contrast , as in fig .
[ fig3](b ) , when we take averages over a sufficient number of @xmath28 chosen for each system size , all the results converge onto a single curve and the finite size effects are sufficiently small , even for the rectangular - shaped clusters .
we have checked the efficiency in wide parameter regions of @xmath11 and @xmath12 and confirmed that the averaging procedure is efficient enough to suppress the finite size effects coming from the discreteness of the wave numbers .
we adopt @xmath28 used in fig .
[ fig3](b ) for each @xmath39 in the following calculations . dependence of the electron density @xmath37 at @xmath38 for different numbers of grid points @xmath28 .
( a ) the system size @xmath40 and ( b ) @xmath41 .
the lines are guides for the eyes . ] dependence of @xmath37 at @xmath38 for different system sizes @xmath39 ( a ) without taking average ( @xmath42 ) and ( b ) with taking average @xmath28 ( the numbers are shown in the legend ) .
the lines are guides for the eyes . ]
applying the method above , we investigate the magnetic behavior of the model ( [ eq : h ] ) in the limit of @xmath16 at the electron density @xmath15 .
the results are presented in fig .
[ fig4 ] . at @xmath43 , the square of total magnetization per site @xmath44 grows rapidly [ fig .
[ fig4](a ) ] and the uniform magnetic susceptibility @xmath45 exhibits a peak [ fig .
[ fig4](b ) ] , signaling a ferromagnetic transition .
we estimate @xmath13 from the crossing point of the binder parameter @xmath46 for different system sizes : the estimate is @xmath47 .
dependences of ( a ) square of total magnetization per site , ( b ) uniform magnetic susceptibility , and ( c ) binder parameter for the total magnetization per site .
the electron density is fixed at @xmath15 by controlling @xmath11 . ]
the value of @xmath13 is quite similar to that for the cubic lattice model , @xmath48 @xcite .
this is reasonable because the de ferromagnetism is governed by the kinetic energy of electrons , and does not strongly depend on the details of the lattice structure .
our results demonstrate that systematic and quantitative study of the phase diagram is feasible within relatively small size clusters by implementing the averaging procedure over twisted boundary conditions in the monte carlo calculations .
this gives a starting point for further study of frustrated de - based models and for understanding the physics of pyrochlore - based ferromagnets such as mo pyrochlore oxides .
studies of phase competitions in the model including the super - exchange coupling between localized moments are in progress .
this work was supported by grant - in - aid for scientific research on priority areas ( nos .
17071003 , 19052008 ) , global coe program the physical sciences frontier " and by the next generation super computing project , nanoscience program , mext , japan .
9 zener c 1951 _ phys . rev . _ * 82 * 403 | double - exchange model incorporates interplay between itinerant electrons localized magnetic moments hamiltonian given by @xmath0 @xmath1 annihilation operator of electron with spin @xmath5 transfer integral for nearest - neighbor sites @xmath6 spin operators of itinerant electron localized spin coupled by hunds - rule coupling @xmath9 @xmath10 density operator chemical potential localized spins @xmath8 classical vectors model introduced by zener @xcite studied for physics of perovskite manganese oxides rediscovery of colossal magneto - resistance phenomena stimulated studies for systems extensions super - exchange interaction between moments orbital degeneracy of electrons electron - phonon couplings model ferromagnetic metallic state at low temperature kinetic energy electrons by aligning localized moments de mechanism @xcite efforts to estimate ferromagnetic transition temperature @xmath13 @xcite determined by large - scale monte carlo simulation electron density limit of @xmath16 numerical results for ferromagnetic transition defined on geometrically frustrated lattice structurefrustrated lattice structures consider pyrochlore lattice three - dimensional network corner - sharing tetrahedra in fig .(a ) experimental motivations in family mo pyrochlore oxides ionic size of rare earth element r large compounds become ferromagnetic metal at low @xmath12 de mechanism key role behavior first step understanding thermodynamic properties pyrochlore systems investigate ferromagnetic transition by monte carlo calculations for simplest case model ( eq : h ] ) limit @xmath16 employ monte carlo method large fluctuations frustrated system method standard configurations classical localized spins sampled procedure monte carlo weight calculated by exact diagonalization fermion hamiltonian matrix spin configuration bottleneck exact diagonalization limits system sizes to several hundreds sites improved method polynomial expansion density of states developed authors frustrated systems less efficient singular form density of states present pyrochlore case density of states-functional peak due to two flat bands two van - hove singularities ( ) in non - interacting model fig . fig1](b ) employ standard methodsystematic analysis limited system sizes apply technique averaging over twisted boundary conditions @xcite twisted boundary condition replacing transfer integral @xmath5 by @xmath24 @xmath25 magnetic flux @xmath26 vector connecting nearest sites @xmath6 average by integral over @xmath27 calculated by sum over @xmath28 grid points procedure reduces finite size effects discreteness wave numbers model limit @xmath29 averaging procedure for finite size cluster spin configurations provides results for infinite size system ferromagnetic averaging procedure @xmath29 finite size cluster gives exact result thermodynamic limit apply averaging procedure to each monte carlo snapshot monte carlo weight corresponds ensemble average over independent systems different boundary conditions average over grid points with @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 and @xmath35 linear dimension of system measured cubic unit cell total number of sites @xmath36 demonstrate efficiency calculating electron density @xmath37 as function of @xmath12 show monte carlo results at @xmath38 in figs fig2 fig3 @xmath28 dependence for two system sizesboth cases results converge single curve increasing @xmath28 necessary @xmath28 for convergence becomes smaller as system size @xmath39 increases figure fig3 shows @xmath39 dependence with without averages without averages results scattered for different system sizes fig(a )(b take averages over sufficient number @xmath28 for each system size results converge single curve finite size effects small even for rectangular - shaped clusters checked efficiency in parameter regions @xmath11 and @xmath12 confirmed averaging procedure efficient suppress finite size effects adopt @xmath28 in fig(b ) for each @xmath39 in calculations dependence of electron density @xmath37 at @xmath38 for different numbers grid points @xmath28 dependence of @xmath37 at @xmath38 for different system sizes @xmath39 without average with taking average investigate magnetic behavior model in limit of @xmath16 at electron density @xmath15 results presented in fig fig4 ] at @xmath43 square of total magnetization per site @xmath44 grows rapidlyfig4](a ) uniform magnetic susceptibility @xmath45 peak(b signaling ferromagnetic transition estimate @xmath13 crossing binder parameter @xmath46 different system sizes estimate @xmath47 total magnetization per site uniform magnetic susceptibility binder parameter electron density fixed at @xmath15 @xmath11 value @xmath13 similar cubic lattice model @xmath48 de ferromagnetism governed by kinetic energy electrons depend lattice structure results demonstrate systematic study phase diagram feasible small size clusters averaging procedure over twisted boundary conditions monte carlo calculations starting point for study frustrated de - based models understanding physics pyrochlore - based ferromagnets studies of phase competitions super - exchange coupling between moments progress work supported by grant - aid research global coe program physical sciences frontier next generation super computing project nanoscience program japan 9 1951 phys . rev . * 82 * 403 | 0.319939 | 2,072 | 1,031 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,579 | new results on the low energy @xmath0 annihilation into hadrons from novosibirsk and beijing are described .
implications of the new measurements for the evaluation of the hadronic contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment are discussed . | @xmath0 annihilation into hadrons is one of the most important suppliers of experimental information on the quark interactions . at high energy it serves as a test of perturbative qcd whereas at low energies it provides insight into nonperturbative effects in qcd as well as valuable input to various phenomenological models describing strongly interacting particles .
it became conventional to use the dimensionless quantity @xmath1 to characterize the total cross section of @xmath2 hadrons : [ eq : r ] r=(e^+e^-hadrons)/ ( e^+e^-^+^- ) .
@xmath1 is widely used for various calculations .
particularly , knowledge of @xmath1 with high accuracy is required for the evaluation of @xmath3 , the leading order hadronic contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon @xmath4 ( see @xcite and references therein ) or the value of the fine structure constant at the @xmath5 boson mass @xcite .
@xmath6 known today to better than 1.0 ppm is one of the best measured quantities in physics .
the recently reported measurement of @xmath6 by the e821 collaboration at bnl @xcite and a possible deviation of its result from the predictions of standard model ( sm ) @xcite has generated numerous speculations ( for a review and discussion see @xcite ) .
+ within sm , the uncertainty of the theoretical value of the leading order @xmath6 is dominated by the uncertainty of the hadronic contribution that can be calculated via the dispersion integrals .
[ eq : dint ] a_^had , lo = ( ) ^2 _ 4m_^2^ ds , where the qed kernel @xmath7 is a smooth function of energy varying from 0.63 at @xmath8 to 1 at @xmath9 .
the precision of the @xmath3 calculation depends on the approach used and varies from 1.34 ppm based on @xmath0 data only @xcite to 0.53 ppm if in addition @xmath10-lepton decay data as well as perturbative qcd and qcd sum rules are extensively used @xcite . as it is clear from eq .
[ eq : dint ] , the major contribution to its uncertainty comes from the systematic error of the @xmath1 measurement at low energies ( @xmath11 2 gev@xmath12 ) , which , in turn , is dominated by the systematic error of the measured cross section @xmath13 or pion form factor @xmath14 directly related to it . assuming conservation of the vector current ( cvc ) and isospin symmetry , the spectral function of the @xmath15 decay , where x@xmath16 is a vector hadronic state with i=1 can be related to the corresponding isovector state x@xmath17 produced in @xmath0 annihilation @xcite .
( here x can be @xmath18 ) .
the detailed measurement of the spectral functions was provided by aleph @xcite , opal @xcite and cleo - ii @xcite .
comparison of the hadronic cross sections measured at @xmath0 colliders with the spectral functions of the corresponding @xmath19 decays provides a test of cvc .
if cvc holds with high accuracy , @xmath10-lepton decay data can be also used to substantially improve the accuracy of the calculations mentioned above @xcite .
recent indications that the accuracy of cvc relations is not as good as believed for many years necessitates a careful reanalysis of such estimations @xcite .
thus , new high precision measurements of the cross section of @xmath20 and particularly of the pion form factor as well as precise determinations of the hadronic mass spectra in @xmath10 lepton decays become extremely important .
since 1974 the @xmath0 collider vepp-2 m has been successfully running in the budker institute of nuclear physics in novosibirsk in the c.m.energy range from the threshold of hadron production to 1400 mev @xcite .
its maximum luminosity reached @xmath21 @xmath22s@xmath23 at the @xmath24 meson energy . in the last series of experiments two detectors ( cmd-2 and snd ) installed at vepp-2 m collected about 30 pb@xmath23 each .
cmd-2 described in detail elsewhere @xcite is a general purpose detector . inside a superconducting solenoid with a field of 1 t
there are a drift chamber and proportional z - chamber , both also used for the trigger , and an endcap bgo electromagnetic calorimeter .
outside there is a barrel csi electromagnetic calorimeter and muon streamer tube chambers .
the main goal of cmd-2 is to perform a high precision measurement of the exclusive cross sections of various hadronic channels of @xmath0 annihilation and detailed studies of the low lying vector mesons - @xmath25 and @xmath24 .
snd described in detail elsewhere @xcite is a nonmagnetic detector with drift chambers for tracking and a three layer nai electromagnetic calorimeter .
outside it there are a muon streamer tube chamber and plastic scintillators .
the main goal of snd is to study @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath24 decays as well as main hadronic channels .
both experiments possess some special features making high precision measurements feasible : * large data samples due to the high integrated luminosity and large acceptance * multiple scans of the same energy ranges to avoid possible systematic effects ; the step was 10 mev in the c.m.energy for the continuum region and 1 - 2 mev near the @xmath27 and @xmath24 peaks * the absolute calibration of the beam energy using the resonance depolarization method @xcite reduces to a negligible level a systematic error caused by an uncertainty in the energy measurement which can be significant for cross sections with strong energy dependence * good space and energy resolution lead to small background * redundancy - unstable particles are independently detected via different decay modes ( @xmath28 ; @xmath29 ) * detection efficiencies and calorimeter response are studied by using `` pure '' experimental data samples rather than monte carlo events , e.g. more than 20 million @xmath24 meson decays per detector can be used for that purpose .
new results are available on most of the hadronic channels .
the process @xmath13 is particularly important for various applications because of its large cross section at low energies .
this reaction has been extensively studied before @xcite .
the most precise pion form factor data were obtained in late 70s
early 80s by cmd and olya detectors @xcite .
their accuracy was limited by systematic errors of the experiments , varying from 2% to 15% over the vepp-2 m energy range . in the new measurement with the cmd-2 detector
more than 2 million events of the process @xmath13 were detected from 370 to 1380 mev .
below 600 mev separation of bhabha and @xmath30 events is performed by measuring their momentum . above this energy
the energy deposition of the final particles in the calorimeter has been used .
the number of events of the reaction @xmath31 was evaluated from qed which validity at these energies had been verified before .
the systematic uncertainty of less than 0.6% was achieved in the final analysis of the data set of about 114000 events collected in the energy range 610 to 960 mev in 1994 - 1995 @xcite .
table [ tab : syst ] lists the dominant sources of the systematic error .
analysis is in progress for the rest of events and the expected systematic error ranges from 1% to 3% @xcite . fig .
[ fig : pipi ] shows results of the pion form factor measurement coming from cmd-2 .
.main sources of systematic errors .
[ tab : syst ] [ cols="<,^",options="header " , ] since e821 collaboration plans to improve the accuracy , it is clear that further progress is also needed from the theoretical side . at the present time
the analysis of the @xmath32 data as well as other hadronic final states in the whole energy range accessible to cmd-2 is in progress .
independent information is also expected in close future from other experiments studying low energy @xmath0 annihilation @xcite . when all the above mentioned data are taken into account
, one can expect further improvement of the overall error of @xmath3 compared to the current one .
it is very tempting to use an independent set of the @xmath10 lepton data to improve the existing evaluations of the hadronic effects .
however , as we learned from the talk of a. hcker at this workshop @xcite , recent analysis revealed the apparent incompatibility of @xmath0 and @xmath10 lepton spectral functions @xcite . as a result ,
the @xmath10 lepton based evaluation and the @xmath0 based one are hardly consistent , so that their averaging does nt improve the accuracy .
more work is needed to clarify the reasons of this effect .
thus , new experiments in novosibirsk and beijing considerably improved the accuracy of @xmath1 in the energy ranges below 1.38 gev and between 2 and 5 gev allowing significant improvement of the uncertainty of @xmath3 .
precise tests of the relation between the @xmath0 cross sections and @xmath10 branching ratios will require better understanding of the isospin symmetry breaking effects and radiative corrections .
together with the more detailed analysis of systematic effects in both @xmath0 and @xmath10 lepton sectors , it should allow to perform new precise evaluations of the hadronic corrections .
further significant progress will become possible after new experiments planned at beijing , cornell and novosibirsk .
also promising looks a possibility to study low energy @xmath0 annihilation by the radiative return from the @xmath33 or @xmath24 mesons @xcite .
the author is grateful to a. seiden and his colleagues from the university of california , santa cruz for an opportunity to present this talk and for the excellent organization of the workshop .
special thanks are due to a.e .
bondar , a. czarnecki , m. davier , g.v .
fedotovich , a. hcker , f. jegerlehner , p.p .
krokovny , l.m .
kurdadze , w.j .
marciano , a.i .
milstein , and a.i .
vainshtein for numerous stimulating discussions . | @xmath0 annihilation into hadrons experimental information quark interactions high energy perturbative qcd low energies insight nonperturbative effects qcd input phenomenological models interacting particles conventional dimensionless quantity @xmath1 cross section @xmath2 hadrons r r=(e^+e^-hadrons)/ e^+e^-^+^- ) @xmath1 used for calculations knowledge accuracy required evaluation @xmath3 leading order hadronic contribution anomalous magnetic moment muon @xmath4 fine structure constant @xmath5 boson mass @xmath6 better than 1.0 ppm best measured measurement @xmath6 e821 collaboration @xcite possible deviation from predictions standard model generated speculations uncertainty theoretical value leading order @xmath6 dominated hadronic contribution calculated dispersion integrals eq : dint ] a_^had , lo = ( ) ^2 _ 4m_^2^ ds qed kernel @xmath7 smooth function of energy varying 0.63 at @xmath8 to 1 at @xmath9precision @xmath3 calculation depends approach varies from 1.34 ppm @xmath0 data to 0.53 ppm @xmath10-lepton decay data perturbative qcd sum rules used major contribution uncertainty from systematic error @xmath1 measurement at low energies dominated by systematic error measured cross section @xmath13 or pion form factor @xmath14 related assuming conservation vector current isospin symmetry spectral function of @xmath15 decay x@xmath16 vector hadronic state i=1 related to isovector state x@xmath17 @xmath0 annihilation detailed measurement spectral functions provided by aleph opal cleo - ii comparison hadronic cross sections @xmath0 colliders with spectral functions @xmath19 decays test of cvc if cvc high accuracy @xmath10-lepton decay data improve accuracy calculations indications accuracy of cvc relations not necessitates reanalysis estimations new high precision measurements cross section @xmath20 pion form factor precise determinations hadronic mass spectra in @xmath10 lepton decays important1974 @xmath0 collider vepp-2 m running budker institute nuclear physics novosibirsk hadron production to 1400 mev maximum luminosity reached @xmath21 meson energy last two detectors cmd-2 snd collected 30 pb@xmath23 each cmd-2 general purpose detector superconducting solenoid field 1 t drift chamber proportional z - chamber endcap bgo electromagnetic calorimeter outside barrel csi electromagnetic calorimeter muon streamer tube chambers goal cmd-2 high precision measurement hadronic channels @xmath0 annihilation studies low lying vector mesons @xmath25 @xmath24 snd nonmagnetic detector drift chambers three layer nai electromagnetic calorimeter muon streamer tube chamber plastic scintillators snd study @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath24 decays main hadronic channels experiments special features large data samples high luminosity acceptance multiple scans same energy ranges systematic effects step 10 mev c.m.energy continuum region 1 - 2 mev @xmath27 @xmath24 peaks calibration beam energy resonance depolarization method reduces systematic error uncertainty energy measurement significant strong energy dependence good space energy resolution small background redundancy - unstable particles detected decay modes @xmath28 @xmath29 detection efficiencies calorimeter response studied experimental data samples monte carlo events 20 million @xmath24 meson decays per detector new results hadronic channels process @xmath13 important large cross section low energies reaction studied before precise pion form factor data late 70s early 80s cmd olya detectors accuracy limited systematic errors 2% to 15% vepp-2 m energy range new measurement cmd-2 detector 2 million events detected 370 to 1380 mev below 600 mev separation bhabha @xmath30 events momentum energy deposition final particles calorimeter used number events reaction @xmath31 evaluated qed validity verified systematic uncertainty less than 0.6% final analysis data set 114000 events 610 to 960 mev 1994 - 1995 dominant sources systematic erroranalysis progress expected systematic error ranges 1% to 3% @xcite fig shows results pion form factor measurement from cmd-2 sources systematic errors tab : syst cols=" e821 collaboration plans improve accuracy further progress needed theoretical side analysis @xmath32 data other hadronic final states energy range cmd-2 progress independent information expected from other experiments low energy @xmath0 annihilation @xcite improvement overall error @xmath3 tempting to use independent set @xmath10 lepton data improve evaluations hadronic effects analysis revealed incompatibility of @xmath0 @xmath10 lepton spectral functions @xmath10 lepton based evaluation @xmath0 based consistent averaging does nt improve accuracy more work needed clarify new experiments in novosibirsk beijing improved accuracy @xmath1 in energy ranges below 1.38 gev between 2 and 5 gev improvement uncertainty @xmath3 precise tests relation @xmath0 cross sections @xmath10 branching ratios require understanding isospin symmetry breaking effects radiative corrections detailed analysis systematic effects @xmath0 @xmath10 lepton sectors allow new precise evaluations hadronic correctionsprogress possible after experiments at beijing cornell novosibirsk promising study low energy @xmath0 annihilation by radiative return from @xmath33 @xmath24 mesons @xcite author grateful to a. seiden colleagues university of california santa cruz for opportunity present talk organization workshop thanks to bondar czarnecki davier fedotovich hcker jegerlehner krokovny kurdadze marciano milstein vainshtein for discussions | 0.351065 | 2,288 | 1,188 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,582 | a phenomenological model for the clustering of dark matter halos on the light - cone is presented . in particular ,
an empirical prescription for the scale- , mass- , and time - dependence of halo biasing is described in detail .
a comparison of the model predictions against the light - cone output from the hubble volume @xmath0-body simulation indicates that the present model is fairly accurate for scale above @xmath1mpc .
then i argue that the practical limitation in applying this model comes from the fact that we have not yet fully understood what are clusters of galaxies , especially at high redshifts .
this point of view may turn out to be too pessimistic after all , but should be kept in mind in attempting _
precision cosmology _ with clusters of galaxies .
# 1_#1 _ # 1_#1 _ = # 1 1.25 in .125 in .25 in | the standard picture of cosmological structure formation suggests that any visible object forms in a gravitational potential of _ dark matter halos_. therefore , a detailed description of dark halo clustering is the most basic step toward understanding the clustering of visible objects in the universe . for this purpose , many theoretical models for halo clustering have been developed and then tested against extensive numerical simulations .
first , i will describe our most recent theoretical model for clustering of dark matter halos ( hamana , yoshida , suto & evrard 2001b ) .
in particular , we focus on their high - redshift clustering where the past light - cone effect is important
. then i will show that our model predictions are in good agreement with the result from a light - cone output of the hubble volume simulation ( evrard et al .
finally i will discuss a fundamental difficulty in relating the halo model to clusters of galaxies .
my conclusion is that we already have a reliable empirical model for the halo clustering , but that we need to understand what are the clusters of galaxies , especially at high redshifts , before attempting _
precision cosmology _ with clusters of galaxies .
as emphasized by suto et al.(1999 ) , for instance , observations of high - redshift objects are carried out only through the past light - cone defined at @xmath2 , and the corresponding theoretical modeling should properly take account of a variety of physical effects which are briefly summarized below .
assuming the cold dark matter ( cdm ) paradigm , the linear power spectrum of the mass density fluctuations is computed by solving the boltzmann equation for systems of cdm , baryons , photons and ( usually massless for simplicity ) neutrinos . the resulting spectrum @xmath3 in real space is specified by a set of cosmological parameters including the density parameter @xmath4 , the baryon density parameter @xmath5 , and the hubble constant @xmath6 in units of 100/km / s / mpc , and the cosmological constant @xmath7 .
then one can obtain its nonlinear counterpart in real space , @xmath8 by adopting a fitting formula of peacock & doods ( 1996 ) .
the most important ingredient in describing the clustering of halos is their biasing properties .
the mass - dependent halo bias model was developed by mo & white ( 1996 ) on the basis of the extended press - schechter theory . subsequently jing ( 1998 ) and
sheth & tormen ( 1999 ) improved their bias model so as to more accurately reproduce the mass - dependence of bias computed from @xmath0-body simulation results .
we construct an improved halo bias model of the two - point statistics which reproduces the scale - dependence of the taruya & suto ( 2000 ) bias correcting the mass - dependent but scale - independent bias of sheth & tormen ( 1999 ) on linear scales as follows : @xmath9^{0.15 } , \\
b_{\scriptscriptstyle\rm st}(m , z ) & = & 1 + \frac{\nu-1}{\delta_c(z ) } + \frac{0.6}{\delta_c(z)(1 + 0.9\nu^{0.3})},\end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath10 , where @xmath11 is the virial radius of the halo of mass @xmath12 at @xmath13 .
in order to incorporate the halo exclusion effect approximately , we set @xmath14 for @xmath15 . in the above expressions , @xmath16 is the mass variance smoothed over the top - hat radius @xmath17 , @xmath18 is the mean density , @xmath19 , @xmath20 is the linear growth rate of mass fluctuations , and @xmath21 ^ 2 $ ] . in linear theory of gravitational evolution of fluctuations ,
any density fluctuations induce the corresponding peculiar velocity field , which results in the systematic distortion of the pattern of distribution of objects in redshift space ( kaiser 1987 ) .
in addition , virialized nonlinear objects have an isotropic and large velocity dispersion . this _ finger - of - god _ effect
significantly suppresses the observed amplitude of correlation on small scales . with those effects , the nonlinear power spectrum _ in redshift space _
is given as @xmath22^{2 } d_{\rm vel}[k\mu\sigma_{\rm halo } ] , \label{nonlinear}\ ] ] where @xmath23 is the fourier transform of the pairwise peculiar velocity distribution function ( e.g. , magira et al . 2000 ) , @xmath24 is the direction cosine in @xmath25-space , @xmath26 is the one - dimensional _ pair - wise _ velocity dispersion of halos , and @xmath27 while both @xmath26 and @xmath28 depend on the halo mass @xmath12 , separation @xmath29 , and @xmath13 in reality , we neglect their scale - dependence in computing the redshift distortion , and adopt the halo number - weighted averages : @xmath30 where we adopt the halo mass function @xmath31 fitted by jenkins et al .
the value of @xmath32 , the halo center - of - mass velocity dispersion at @xmath2 , is modeled following yoshida , sheth & diaferio ( 2001 ) .
then our empirical halo bias model can be applied to the two - point correlation function of halos at @xmath13 in redshift space as @xmath33 all cosmological observations are carried out on a light - cone , the null hypersurface of an observer at @xmath2 , and not on any constant - time hypersurface . thus clustering amplitude and shape of objects should naturally evolve even _ within _ the survey volume of a given observational catalogue . unless restricting the objects at a narrow bin of @xmath13 at the expense of the statistical significance , the proper understanding of the data requires a theoretical model to take account of the average over the light cone ( matsubara , suto , & szapudi 1997 ; mataresse et al .
1997 ; moscardini et al .
1998 ; nakamura , matsubara , & suto 1998 ; yamamoto & suto 1999 ; suto et al .
according to the present prescription , the two - point correlation function of halos on the light - cone is computed by averaging over the appropriate halo number density and the comoving volume element between the survey range @xmath34 : @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the comoving volume element per unit solid angle . while the above expression assumes a mass - limited sample for simplicity , any observational selection function
can be included in the present model fairly straightforwardly ( hamana , colombi & suto 2001a ) once the the relation between the luminosity of the visible objects and the mass of the hosting dark matter halos is specified .
figure 1 compares our model predictions with the clustering of simulated halos from `` light - cone output '' of the hubble volume @xmath37cdm simulation ( evrard et al .
2001 ) with @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40 , @xmath41 and @xmath42 . for the dark matter correlation functions ,
our model reproduces the simulation data almost perfectly at @xmath43mpc ( see also hamana et al .
this scale corresponds to the mean particle separation of this particular simulation , and thus the current simulation systematically underestimates the real clustering below this scale especially at @xmath44 .
our model and simulation data also show quite good agreement for dark halos at scales larger than @xmath45mpc .
below that scale , they start to deviate slightly in a complicated fashion depending on the mass of halo and the redshift range .
this discrepancy may be ascribed to both the numerical limitations of the current simulations and our rather simplified model for the halo biasing .
nevertheless the clustering of _ clusters _ on scales below @xmath45mpc is difficult to determine observationally anyway , and our model predictions differ from the simulation data only by @xmath46 percent at most . therefore we conclude that in practice our empirical model provides a successful description of halo clustering on the light - cone .
with the successful empirical model of halo clustering , the next natural question is how to apply it in describing _ real _ galaxy clusters . in fact , in my opinion the main obstacle for that purpose is the lack of the universal definition of clusters .
let me give some examples that i can easily think of ( see fig.2 ) .
( i ) press - schechter halos : : : almost all theoretical studies adopt the definition of dark matter halos according to the nonlinear spherical model .
this is characterized by the mean overdensity of @xmath47 ( in the case of the einstein - de sitter universe .
the corresponding expressions in other cosmological models can be also derived . ) . combining this definition with the press - schechter theory ,
the mass function of the dark halos can be computed analytically .
this makes it fairly straightforward to compare the predictions in this model with observations , and therefore this definition has been widely studied in cosmology .
( ii ) halos identified from n - body simulations : : : in reality the gravitationally bound objects in the universe quite often show significant departure from the spherical symmetry .
such non - spherical effects can be directly explored with n - body simulations . even in this methodology , the identification of dark halos from the simulated particle distribution is somewhat arbitrary .
a most conventional method is the friend - of - friend algorithm . in this algorithm ,
the linking length is the only adjustable parameter to controle the resulting halo sample .
its value is usually set to be 0.2 times the mean particle separation in the whole simulation which _ qualitatively _ corresponds to the overdensity of @xmath47 as described above .
( iii ) abell clusters : : : until recently most cosmological studies on galaxy clusters have been based on the abell catalogue . while this is a really amazing set of cluster samples ,
the eye - selection criteria applied on the palomar plates are far from objective and can not be compared with the above definitions in a quantitative sense .
( iv ) x - ray clusters : : : the x - ray selection of clusters significantly improves the reliability of the resulting catalogue due to the increased signal - to - noise and moreover removes the projection contamination compared with the optical selection .
nevertheless the quantitative comparison with halos defined according to ( i ) or ( ii ) requires the knowledge of gas density profile especially in the central part which fairly dominates the total x - ray emission .
( v ) sz clusters : : : the sz cluster survey is especially important in probing the high - z universe . in this case , however , the signal is more sensitive to the temperature profile in clusters than the x - ray selection , and thus one needs additional information / models for temperature in order to compare with the x - ray / simulation results .
the above consideration raises the importance to examine the systematic comparison among the resulting _
cluster / halo _ samples selected differently . in reality , this is a difficult and time - consuming task , and one might argue that we do not have to worry about such _
details _ at this point .
such an optimistic point of view may turn out to be reasonably right after all .
nevertheless it is still important , at present , to keep in mind that this simplistic assumption of `` dark halos = galaxy clusters '' may produce a systematic effect in the detailed comparison between observational data and theoretical models .
i have presented a phenomenological model for clustering of dark matter halos on the light - cone by combining and improving several existing theoretical models ( hamana et al .
one of the most straightforward and important applications of the current model is to predict and compare the clustering of x - ray selected clusters . in doing so ,
however , the one - to - one correspondence between dark halos and observed clusters should be critically examined at some point .
this assumption is a reasonable working hypothesis , but we need more quantitative justification or modification to move on to _ precision cosmology with clusters_. i am afraid that this problem has not been considered seriously simply because the agreement between model predictions and available observations seems already _ satisfactory_. in fact , since current viable cosmological models are specified by a set of many _ adjustable
_ parameters , the agreement does not necessarily justify the underlying assumption .
thus it is dangerous to stop doubting the unjustified assumption because of the ( apparent ) success .
i hope to examine these issues in future .
i would like to thank fred lo for inviting me to this exciting and enjoyable meeting and also for great hospitality at taiwan .
the present work is based on my collaboration with t.hamana , n.yoshida , and a.e.evrard .
this research was supported in part by the grant - in - aid by the ministry of education , science , sports and culture of japan ( 07ce2002 , 12640231 ) .
evrard , a.e .
2001 , apj , submitted hamana , t. , colombi , s. , & suto , y. 2001a , a & a , 367 , 18 hamana , t. , yoshida , n. , suto , y. , & evrard , a.e .
2001b , apj(letters ) , in press jenkins , a. et al .
2001 , mnras , 321 , 372 jing , y.p .
1998 , apj , 503 , l9 kaiser , n. 1987 , mnras , 227 , 1 magira , h. , jing , y.p . , & suto , y. 2000 , apj , 528 , 30 matarrese , s. , coles , p. , lucchin , f. , & moscardini , l. 1997 , mnras , 286 , 115 matsubara , t. , suto , y. , & szapudi , i. 1997 , apj , 491 , l1 mo , h.j .
, & white , s.d.m 1996,mnras , 282 , 347 moscardini , l. , coles , p. , lucchin , & f. , matarrese , s. 1998 , mnras , 299 , 95 nakamura , t. t. , matsubara , t. , & suto , y. 1998 , apj , 494 , 13 peacock , j.a .
, & dodds , s.j .
1996 , mnras , 280 , l19 sheth , r.k . , & tormen , g. 1999 , mnras , 308 , 119 suto , y. , magira , h. , jing , y. p. , matsubara , t. , & yamamoto , k. 1999 , prog.theor.phys.suppl . , 133 , 183 taruya , a. & suto , y . 2000 , apj , 542 , 559 yamamoto , k. , & suto , y. 1999 , apj , 517 , 1 yoshida , n. , sheth , r. , & diaferio , a. 2001 , mnras , in press | standard cosmological suggests visible object forms gravitational dark matter halos detailed description dark halo clustering basic step understanding clustering visible objects theoretical models for halo clustering developed tested against numerical simulations describe recent theoretical model for clustering dark matter halos hamana yoshida suto evrard 2001b focus on high - redshift clustering past light - cone effect important model predictions with light - cone output hubble volume simulation discuss difficulty relating halo model to clusters of galaxies conclusion reliable empirical model for halo clustering need to understand clusters of galaxies high redshifts before precision cosmology suto observations of high - redshift objects through past light - cone at @xmath2 theoretical modeling should account variety physical effects summarized cold dark matter cdm ) paradigm linear power spectrum of mass density fluctuations computed by solving boltzmann equation for systems cdm baryons photons neutrinosspectrum @xmath3 specified by cosmological parameters density @xmath4 baryon density @xmath5 hubble constant @xmath6 100/km / s / mpc cosmological constant @xmath7 nonlinear counterpart @xmath8 formula peacock & doods ( 1996 important clustering halos biasing properties mass - dependent halo bias model developed by mo & white 1996 extended press - schechter theory jing 1998 sheth & tormen ( 1999 ) improved bias model mass - bias @xmath0-body simulation improved halo bias model reproduces scale - dependence taruya & suto ( 2000 ) bias correcting mass - dependent scale - independent bias sheth & tormen ( 1999 ) scales @xmath9{0.15 for @xmath10 @xmath11 virial radius of halo mass @xmath12 at @xmath13 incorporate halo exclusion effect set @xmath14 for @xmath15expressions @xmath16 mass variance top - hat radius @xmath17 @xmath18 mean density @xmath19 @xmath20 linear growth rate mass fluctuations @xmath21 ^ 2 $ gravitational density fluctuations induce velocity field distortion distribution objects redshift space kaiser 1987 ) virialized nonlinear objects have isotropic large velocity dispersion effect suppresses amplitude correlation small scales nonlinear power spectrum in redshift space given @xmath22^{2 } d_{ vel halo @xmath23 fourier transform pairwise velocity distribution function @xmath24 direction cosine @xmath25-space @xmath26 one - dimensional pair velocity dispersion of halos @xmath27 depend on halo mass neglect scale - dependence redshift distortion adopt halo number - weighted averages @xmath30 halo mass function @xmath31 jenkins et al value @xmath32 halo center - of - mass velocity dispersion at @xmath2 modeled yoshida sheth diaferio ( 2001 )empirical halo bias model applied to two - point correlation function of halos at @xmath13 in redshift space @xmath33 cosmological observations on light - cone null hypersurface observer at @xmath2 not constant - time hypersurface clustering amplitude shape of objects evolve within survey volume observational catalogue restricting objects at narrow bin @xmath13 statistical significance understanding data requires theoretical model average over light cone two - point correlation function of halos on light - cone computed by averaging halo number density comoving volume element between survey range @xmath34 : @xmath35 @xmath36 is comoving volume element per unit solid angle expression assumes mass - limited sample observational selection function included in model once relation between luminosity visible objects mass of hosting dark matter halos specified figure 1 compares model predictions with clustering of simulated halos from light - cone output hubble volume @xmath37cdm simulation with @xmath38 @xmath42 dark matter correlation functions model reproduces simulation data at @xmath43mpcscale corresponds to mean particle separation simulation current simulation underestimates real clustering below scale especially at @xmath44 model and simulation data show agreement for dark halos at scales larger than @xmath45mpc below they deviate depending on mass halo redshift range discrepancy to numerical limitations current simulations simplified model for halo biasing clustering on scales below @xmath45mpc difficult to determine observationally model predictions differ from simulation data by @xmath46 percent empirical model provides successful description of halo clustering on light - cone apply in describing real galaxy clusters main obstacle lack of universal definition of clusters examples press - schechter halos theoretical studies adopt definition of dark matter halos nonlinear spherical model characterized by mean overdensity of @xmath47 expressions in models combining definition with press - schechter theory mass function of dark halos can be computed analytically straightforward to compare predictions with observations definition widely studied in cosmology halos identified from n - body simulations gravitationally bound objects often show significant departure from spherical symmetrynon - spherical effects explored with n - body simulations identification of dark halos from particle distribution arbitrary conventional method is friend - of - friend algorithm linking length is only adjustable parameter halo sample value usually set to 0.2 times mean particle separation simulation corresponds to overdensity of @xmath47 iii ) abell clusters cosmological studies on galaxy clusters based on abell catalogue eye - selection criteria on palomar plates from objective can not be compared with above definitions iv ) x - ray clusters selection improves reliability catalogue increased signal - to - noise removes projection contamination quantitative comparison with halos requires knowledge of gas density profile especially in central part dominates total x - ray emission v ) sz clusters survey important in probing high - z universe signal more sensitive to temperature profile in than x - ray selection needs additional information / models for temperature to compare with x - ray / simulation results importance to examine systematic comparison among cluster / halo samples selected differently difficult time - consuming task worry about details optimistic point of view may rightimportant to simplistic assumption of dark halos = galaxy clusters may systematic effect in comparison between observational data theoretical models presented phenomenological model for clustering dark matter halos on light - cone combining improving theoretical models hamana et al model predict compare clustering of x - ray clusters - to - correspondence between dark halos observed clusters should be examined assumption reasonable hypothesis need more quantitative justification modification to precision cosmology with clusters problem not considered seriously agreement between model predictions observations satisfactory current cosmological models specified by adjustable parameters agreement justify assumption dangerous to stop doubting unjustified assumption apparent success hope to examine issues future thank fred lo for meeting hospitality at taiwan work based on collaboration with t.hamana n.yoshida a.e.evrard research supported by grant - in - aid ministry of education , science sports culture of japan ( 07ce2002 , 12640231 ) evrard a.e 2001 hamana t. colombi suto y 2001a , 367 , 18 evrard2001b apj(letters press jenkins a. 2001 mnras 321 , 372 jing y 1998 apj 503 l9 kaiser 1987 mnras 227 , 1 magira jing suto 2000 apj 528 , 30 matarrese coles lucchin moscardini 1997 mnras 286 , 115 matsubara suto szapudi 1997 apj l1 mo h.j white s.d.m 1996 282 , 347 moscardini coles lucchin matarrese 1998 mnras 299 , 95 nakamura matsubara suto 1998 apj 494 , 13 peacock j dodds s.j 1996 mnras 280 l19 sheth r.k tormen 1999 mnras 308 , 119 suto magira jing matsubara yamamoto 1999 prog.theor.phys.suppl 133 , 183 taruya suto 2000 apj 542 , 559 yamamoto suto 1999 apj 517 , 1 yoshida n.sheth r. diaferio. 2001 mnras press | 0.567465 | 3,313 | 1,653 | , Saving $0.1 in GPT-4. |
198,585 | the explosion of a white dwarf of mass 1.36 m@xmath0 has been simulated in three dimensions with the aid of a sph code .
the explosion follows the delayed detonation paradigma . in this case
the deflagration - detonation transition is induced by the large corrugation of the flame front resulting from rayleigh - taylor instability and turbulence .
the nucleosynthetic yields have been calculated , showing that some neutronized isotopes such as @xmath1 or @xmath2 are not overproduced with respect to the solar system ratios .
the distribution of intermediate - mass elements is also compatible with the spectra of normal snia .
the excepcion is , however , the abundance of carbon and oxygen , which are overproduced . | the undeniable influence of type ia supernovae explosions in , among others , the chemical evolution of the galaxy and cosmology makes the quest of solid theoretical models as an urgent task .
guided by the insight gained from two decades of modelization of spherically symmetric models , modern multidimensional calculations try to make a reliable picture of the explosion on physical basis , minimizing the number of free parameters .
nevertheless , even supossing that the exploding object is a co white dwarf near to the chandrasekhar - mass limit the subject is not firmly resolved yet . in particular , there remain uncertainties in the immediate pre - explosive stage and in the mechanism / s by which the thermonuclear flame is spreaded through the white dwarf . in this regard a difficult point
is related with the acceleration of the combustion .
we know that the explosion is triggered by a thermonuclear flame whose initial velocity is clearly subsonic .
we also know , from parametrized calculations , that after several sound - crossing times the effective velocity of the deflagration must reach a significant fraction of of the local sound speed in order to synthesize the adequate amount of nuclear species to explain both light curve and spectra .
this translates into an increase factor of thousands over the pure laminar value at maximum effective velocity .
the physical mechanism behind this huge factor is currently attributed to flame surface corrugation by hydrodynamical instabilities ( mainly rayleigh - taylor and turbulence ) .
a branch in this scenario could be achieved if the already fast deflagration turns into a steady detonation at late times , when flame density is below @xmath3 g.@xmath4 .
this is the so called delayed - detonation scenario which , in calculations carried out in spherical symmetry , have provided some of the best models for snia in the past @xcite . in this short paper we present the results of a calculation concerning the delayed detonation model carried out in three dimensions by using a sph code .
we describe the main features of the evolution of the model with more emphasis in the nucleoshynthetical side .
crrrrrrr t(s ) & @xmath5 ( g.@xmath6&@xmath7 ( g.@xmath6 & @xmath8 @xmath9&@xmath10 & @xmath11 & @xmath12 + 0&@xmath13&@xmath14&@xmath15&@xmath16&@xmath17 & @xmath18 + 1.54&@xmath19&@xmath20&@xmath21&@xmath22 & @xmath23&@xmath24 + 7.92&@xmath25&@xmath26&@xmath27&@xmath28 & @xmath29 & @xmath30 + first column is the elapsed time since the beginning of the sph simulation .
previously , the initial stages of the explosion were calculated with a lagrangian one - dimensional code .
the initial model is a white dwarf of @xmath31 m@xmath0 in hydrostatic equilibrium .
the first stages of the explosion were followed by using a 1d hydrocode until the central density declined to @xmath32 g.@xmath33 . from here on the model was mapped into a 3d distribution of 250,000 particules and its evolution followed with the sph . in addition , the velocity field around the flame front was perturbed at the beginning in order to seed the hydrodynamical instabilities .
this allows us to describe the large scale deformation of the flame in a self - consistent way although a lot of surface is lost owing to the limited resolution of the code . to take into account these hidden lengthscales
a subgrid model has to be set .
we assume that the main effect of the smallest lengthscales is to increase the laminar velocity of the flame , @xmath34 , until a first effective value @xmath35 .
afterwards the final effective velocity @xmath36 is directly computed from the hydrocode @xcite . during the progression of the calculation
the geometrical features of the flame front were tracked by calculating the main scaling parameters of the surface such as @xmath37 , @xmath38 and flame fractal dimension @xmath39 by using the method described in @xcite . as discussed in @xcite the local evolution of @xmath39 can be used as a practical criteria to turn the deflagration into a detonation .
in particular , we have allowed such transition in those regions of the flame with fractal dimension higher than 2.5 once flame mean density is @xmath40 g.@xmath4 .
the relevant features of the evolution of the model are summarized in table 1 .
basically the explosion proceeded in two phases . from t=0
s to t=1.54 s the combustion propagated subsonically as a deflagration .
however , a considerable acceleration of the flame was seen because the effective flame velocity passed from @xmath41 for @xmath42 to @xmath43 at @xmath44 . at the end of this phase
the total energy was already positive , although too low to represent a normal supernovae explosion . at t=1.54
s a detonation was artificially induced in those regions of the flame surface which had a large fractal dimension . in consequence
multiple detonations emerged from unconnected points spreaded on a very irregular surface .
information about the nucleosynthetic yields is provided in table 1 and figures 1,2 .
the ejected amount of @xmath45 is enough to power the light curve of a typical type ia supernovae and the amount of silicon and other intermediate - mass elements is consistent with the spectrum near maximum light .
a clear difference with respect 1d calculations is that the abundance distribution in velocity space show a lot of dispersion in comparison .
the isotopic composition of the ejecta , calculated by postprocessing the dynamical model , is depicted in figure 2 .
although we see a large production of vanadium there is not overproduction of problematic isotopes such as @xmath1 or @xmath2 .
this is a feature of multidimensional models where electron captures proceed , on average , at lower density owing to the buoyancy of high entropy ashes .
the ejected amount of carbon and oxygen is somewhat high , being distributed in isolated pockets within the star but not close to the center .
our results suggest that the three - dimensional version of the delayed detonation model is also able to reproduce the main observational features of type ia supernovae . 9 p. hflich and a. khokhlov , apj 457 ( 1996 ) 500 .
d. garca - senz and e. bravo , in proceedings of the eso / mpa / mpe workshop `` from twilight to highlight : the physics of supernovae '' , ( 2003 ) , in press
. d. garca - senz , e. bravo and n. serichol , apjss 115 ( 1998 ) 119 | influence of type ia supernovae explosions in chemical evolution galaxy cosmology makes quest solid theoretical models urgent guided by insight from modelization spherically symmetric models modern multidimensional calculations reliable picture explosion minimizing free parameters supossing exploding object is co white dwarf near chandrasekhar - mass limit subject not resolved uncertainties in pre - explosive stage mechanism thermonuclear flame through white dwarf difficult point with acceleration combustion explosion triggered by thermonuclear flame initial velocity subsonic after sound - crossing times effective velocity deflagration must reach fraction of local sound speed to synthesize nuclear species light curve spectra translates into increase factor of thousands over laminar value at maximum effective velocity mechanism to flame surface corrugation by hydrodynamical instabilities rayleigh taylor turbulence could if fast deflagration turns into steady detonation at late times flame density below @xmath3 g.@xmath4 delayed - detonation scenario provided best models for snia paper results of calculation delayed detonation model in three dimensions sph code .describe main features evolution model emphasis nucleoshynthetical side t(s ) @xmath5@xmath6@xmath7@xmath6 @xmath8 @xmath9@xmath10 @xmath12 + 0@xmath13 @xmath18 + 1.54@xmath19@xmath24 + 7.92@xmath25@xmath26@xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 first column elapsed time beginning sph simulation initial stages explosion calculated lagrangian one - dimensional code initial model white dwarf @xmath31 m@xmath0 hydrostatic equilibrium first stages followed 1d hydrocode central density declined @xmath32.@xmath33 model mapped 3d distribution 250,000 particules evolution followed sph velocity field flame front perturbed hydrodynamical instabilities describe large scale deformation flame surface lost limited resolution code hidden lengthscales subgrid model set main effect smallest lengthscales increase laminar velocity flame @xmath34 until first effective value @xmath35 final effective velocity @xmath36 computed from hydrocode @xcite progression calculation geometrical features flame front tracked scaling parameters @xmath37 @xmath38 flame fractal dimension @xmath39 method @xcite local evolution of @xmath39 criteria turn deflagration into detonation allowed transition in regions fractal dimension higher than 2.5 flame mean density @xmath40 g.@xmath4 evolution summarized in table 1 explosion in two phases t=0 s to t=1.54 s combustion propagated subsonically as deflagration acceleration flame flame velocity passed from @xmath41 to @xmath43 @xmath44 total energy positive too low normal supernovae explosion t=1.54 s detonation induced in large fractal dimension multiple detonations emerged from unconnected points irregular surface nucleosynthetic yields in table 1 figures 1,2 ejected amount @xmath45 enough power light curve typical supernovae silicon intermediate - mass elements consistent with spectrum near maximum light abundance distribution in velocity space dispersion isotopic composition ejecta calculated depicted in figure 2 large production vanadium not overproduction of problematic isotopes @xmath1 or @xmath2 feature multidimensional models electron captures lower density buoyancy high entropy ashes ejected carbon oxygen high distributed isolated pockets star not close center results suggest three - dimensional delayed detonation model features type ia supernovae. hflich khokhlov apj 457 ( 1996 ) 500 garca - senz. bravo proceedings eso mpa workshop twilight highlight supernovae 2003 ) garca - senz bravo n. serichol apjss 115 ( 1998 ) 119 | 0.264456 | 1,503 | 765 | , Saving $0.0 in GPT-4. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.