sample_number
int64 8
203k
| abstract
stringlengths 21
17.4k
| article
stringlengths 0
18.9k
| compressed_article
stringlengths 0
10.9k
| compression_time
float64 0
0.78
| original_tokens
int64 0
3.79k
| compressed_tokens
int64 0
2.29k
| token_saving
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
202,491
|
we consider mechamism of exchange coupling based on interaction between electrons in nonmagnetic layer . depending on ratio of inverse time of diffusion of electrons between ferromagnetic layers and ferromagnetic splitting of conducting electrons
this mechanism describes transition from ferromagnetic to concollinear ordering of magnetizations of ferromagnetic layers .
[ theorem]acknowledgement [ theorem]algorithm [ theorem]axiom [ theorem]claim [ theorem]conclusion [ theorem]condition [ theorem]conjecture [ theorem]corollary [ theorem]criterion [ theorem]definition [ theorem]example [ theorem]exercise [ theorem]lemma [ theorem]notation [ theorem]problem [ theorem]proposition [ theorem]remark [ theorem]solution [ theorem]summary
|
in metallic ferromagnet - nonferromagnet - ferromagnet multilayers ( see fig . 1 ) magnetic structure oscillates between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic orientations of the ferromagnets magnetizations as a function of thickness of nonmagnetic metal @xmath0 with a period of order of the fermi wave length @xcite@xcite @xcite@xcite@xcite@xcite .
the explanation of this phenomenon is based on the fact that the interlayer coupling is due to ruderman - kittel interaction between electron spins in different ferromagnets .
further investigations discovered structures with perpendicular orientations of the ferromagnets magnetizations ( see for review @xcite ) .
often phenomenological coupling between magnetizations of ferromagnetic layers can be represented as sum of bilinear and biquadratic contributions @xmath1 here @xmath2 is angle between directions of magnetizations of ferromagnetic films .
bilinear constant @xmath3 oscillates as function of interlayer distance @xmath4 in case of large positive biquadratic constant @xmath5 minimum of @xmath6 corresponds to @xmath7 . as explained by slonzevskii large positive biquadratic coupling might be result of spatial fluctuations of bilinear coupling @xmath3 due to ferromagnet - nonferromagnet surface roughness @xcite . in disordered system , when @xmath0 is larger than electron mean free path @xmath8 , rkky interaction @xmath9 , averaged over realizations of scattering potential exponentially decreases @xcite . at the same time fluctuations of local exchange
become much larger than @xmath10 @xcite giving rise to biquadratic contribution @xmath11 @xcite . here
we propose mechanism of coupling in disordered multilayers based on interaction between electrons in nonmagnetic layer .
spin fluctuations in system of interacting electrons give rise to contribution to thermodynamic potential@xcite , which depends on magnetic field or , in our case , on relative orientation of magnetizations in ferromagnetic layers .
here we show that in magnetic multilayer this mechanism describes transition between ferromagnetic and noncolinear ordering with increasing distance between ferromagnetic layers or value of ferromagnetic splitting of conducting electrons .
we assume that magnetic multilayer can be described by hamiltonian @xmath12 here @xmath13 is hamiltonian of free electrons in random field .
second term describes exchange field in ferromagnetic layers .
@xmath14 is ferromagnetic splitting of conducting electrons .
@xmath15 is unit vector of direction of magnetization of ferromagnetic layers .
@xmath16at @xmath17 and @xmath18at @xmath19 as it is shown on figure 1 .
@xmath20 and @xmath21 are creation and annihilation operators , @xmath22 are pauli matrixes .
integration in second term is over ferromagnetic layers .
the last term @xmath23 describes coulomb interaction between electrons in nonmagnetic layer .
we assume that interaction in ferromagnetic layers is taken into account self consistently in @xmath14 . details of calculation are given in the last part of the paper . here
we present the main results .
characteristic energies in the problem are ferromagnetic splitting of conducting electrons @xmath14 and thouless energy @xmath24 .
@xmath25 is diffusion constant of conduction electrons .
we assume that it is the same in nonmagnetic and ferromagnetic layers . in case of small thickness when @xmath26 coupling between ferromagnetic layers has bilinear form and coupling energy per unit area
is @xmath27 here @xmath28 is characteristic constant of interaction in diffusion channel@xcite .
it is positive for coulomb repulsion between electrons .
let us note that in this regime coupling ( 3 ) does not depend on @xmath0 .
minimum of ( 3 ) corresponds to ferromagnetic orientation of magnetizations in multilayer @xmath29 .
note that result is obtained in limit when @xmath30 , or @xmath31 smaller that inverse mean free time @xmath32 . at larger distance @xmath0
when @xmath33 coupling has biquadratic form and coupling energy per unit area is @xmath34 this quantity decreases as @xmath35 with increasing distance .
minimum of coupling energy corresponds to noncollinear state @xmath7 .
both expressions are given for the case of infinite thickness of ferromagnetic layers .
calculation show that in case @xmath36 coupling weakly depends on @xmath37 .
results ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) are also valid provided @xmath38 . in opposite case coupling energy decreases
exponentially as @xmath39 .
let us compare results ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) with biquadratic contribution due to mesoscopic fluctuations of rkky interaction @xcite , which is @xmath40 at @xmath33 and @xmath41 at @xmath42 . here
@xmath43 is an intralayer ferromagnetic stiffness and thickness @xmath44 .
the quantity @xmath45 decreases with @xmath0 much faster than ( 4 ) . also for @xmath46 , @xmath47 coupling energy given by expressions ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) is larger than biquadratic contribution due to mesoscopic fluctuations of rkky in whole range of distances . in this case with increasing distance @xmath48 system is undergo transition between ferromagnetic and perpendicular @xmath7 ordering .
such transition was observed in @xcite .
correction to thermodynamic potential which depends on @xmath49 is given by expression @xcite @xmath50 here constant @xmath28 describes screened coulomb interaction in diffusion channel .
@xmath51 is matsubara frequency .
@xmath52 is electron mean free time .
diffusion ladder satisfies equation @xmath53 it is convenient to present solution of equation ( 6 ) at @xmath54 in the form @xmath55 here we introduce @xmath56 .
@xmath57 is matrix of relative rotation of magnetizations of ferromagnetic layers . in case when direction of magnetization in ferromagnetic layer @xmath17 is directed along @xmath58 axes @xmath59 and at @xmath19 @xmath60direction is @xmath61 , it is matrix of rotation along @xmath62 axes @xmath63 . for simplicity
we consider limit of semiinfinite ferromagnetic layers .
more detail consideration shows that at @xmath44 results weakly depend on thickness of ferromagnetic layers .
it is convenient to introduce boundary conditions for diffusion ladder at ferromagnet - nonferromagnet interfaces taking into account that according to equation ( 6 ) in coordinate system where spins are directed along magnetization , components of ladder with antiparallel spins decreases as @xmath64 and @xmath65 at @xmath66 , where @xmath67 .
components of ladder with parallel spins decreases as @xmath68 at @xmath66 . at @xmath69 where @xmath70 boundary conditions are @xmath71 here we introduce projectors of spins on @xmath58-axes @xmath72 . the same kind of boundary conditions can be introduced for rotated diffusion ladder @xmath73 at @xmath74 . solving system of equations ( 6,8 ) we obtain @xmath75 } { % \left [ 1-\left ( % tcimacro{\func{re}}% % beginexpansion \mathop{\rm re}% % endexpansion \lambda \right ) ^{2}+2\left ( \left| \lambda \right| ^{2}-\left ( % tcimacro{\func{re}}% % beginexpansion \mathop{\rm re}% % endexpansion \lambda \right )
^{2}\right ) \cos \varphi + \left ( \left| \lambda \right| ^{4}-\left ( % tcimacro{\func{re}}% % beginexpansion \mathop{\rm re}% % endexpansion \lambda \right ) ^{2}\right ) \cos ^{2}\varphi \right ] } \end{array}\ ] ] here @xmath76 .
expression ( 9 ) contains divergent terms , which do not depend @xmath2 and must be subtracted . in limit of large exchange splitting when @xmath77 parameter @xmath78 is real .
in this case energy is function of @xmath79 . subtracting in expression ( 9 ) terms which do no depend on angle we obtain @xmath80 main contribution in expression ( 10 )
is from region where @xmath81 , denominator therefore gives only small correction . neglecting it we obtain expression ( 4 ) . in opposite limit of small exchange splitting @xmath82 , @xmath83 and to the order @xmath84 coupling
energy is proportional to @xmath85 @xmath86 calculating ( 11 ) at zero temperature we obtain ( 3 ) .
transition between limits ( 10 ) and ( 11 ) occurs at @xmath87 .
this work is supported by russian fund for fundamental research grant number 01 - 02 - 17794 .
|
metallic ferromagnet - nonferromagnet - multilayers fig . 1 magnetic structure oscillates between ferromagnetic antiferromagnetic orientations thickness nonmagnetic metal period fermi wave length interlayer coupling due to ruderman - kittel interaction between electron spins ferromagnets investigations discovered structures with perpendicular orientations coupling between represented as sum of bilinear biquadratic contributions angle between directions magnetizations bilinear constant oscillates interlayer distance large positive biquadratic constant minimum of @xmath6 corresponds to @xmath7 large positive biquadratic coupling spatial fluctuations bilinear coupling due to ferromagnet - nonferromagnet surface roughness disordered system @xmath0 larger than electron mean free path rkky interaction decreases fluctuations local exchange larger than @xmath10 biquadratic contribution @xmath11 propose mechanism coupling disordered multilayers interaction between electrons in nonmagnetic layer spin fluctuations electrons contribution thermodynamic potential depends on magnetic field relative orientation of magnetizations in ferromagnetic layersmagnetic multilayer transition ferromagnetic noncolinear ordering increasing distance layers splitting electrons multilayer hamiltonian @xmath12 @xmath13 free electrons random field exchange field ferromagnetic layers @xmath14 ferromagnetic splitting electrons unit vector direction magnetization figure 1 @xmath20 creation annihilation operators @xmath22 pauli matrixes integration second term over ferromagnetic layers @xmath23 coulomb interaction electrons nonmagnetic layer interaction ferromagnetic layers @xmath14 details calculation last part paper main results characteristic energies ferromagnetic splitting @xmath14 thouless energy @xmath24 @xmath25 diffusion constant conduction electrons same nonmagnetic ferromagnetic layers small thickness @xmath26 coupling ferromagnetic layers bilinear form coupling energy per unit area @xmath27 @xmath28 characteristic constant interaction diffusion channel positive for coulomb repulsion electrons coupling ( 3 ) depend on @xmath0 minimum 3 ) corresponds ferromagnetic orientation magnetizations multilayer @xmath29 result obtained when @xmath30 @xmath31 smaller inverse mean free time @xmath32larger distance coupling biquadratic energy unit quantity decreases increasing distance minimum energy noncollinear state @xmath7 expressions infinite thickness ferromagnetic layers @xmath36 coupling depends @xmath37 results 3 4 valid @xmath38 coupling energy decreases @xmath39 compare results biquadratic contribution mesoscopic fluctuations rkky interaction @xcite @xmath40 @xmath33 @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 intralayer ferromagnetic stiffness thickness quantity @xmath45 decreases @xmath0 faster 4 @xmath46 @xmath47 coupling energy expressions 3 4 larger biquadratic contribution mesoscopic fluctuations rkky distances increasing distance @xmath48 ferromagnetic perpendicular @xmath7 ordering observed @xcite correction thermodynamic potential @xmath49 expression @xcite @xmath28 screened coulomb interaction diffusion channel @xmath51 matsubara frequency electron mean free time diffusion ladder satisfies equation @xmath53 solution equation 6 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 matrix relative rotation magnetizations ferromagnetic layersdirection magnetization ferromagnetic layer @xmath17 @xmath58 axes @xmath61 matrix rotation @xmath62 axes @xmath63 limit semiinfinite ferromagnetic layers @xmath44 results depend on thickness ferromagnetic layers introduce boundary conditions diffusion ladder ferromagnet - nonferromagnet interfaces equation ( 6 ) spins directed magnetization ladder antiparallel spins @xmath64 @xmath66 parallel spins @xmath68 @xmath66 @xmath69 @xmath70 boundary conditions @xmath71 introduce projectors spins @xmath58-axes @xmath72 boundary conditions rotated diffusion ladder @xmath73 @xmath74solving equations ( 6,8 ) obtain @xmath75 tcimacro{\func{re}} beginexpansion \mathop endexpansion{2}+2\left tcimacro beginexpansion endexpansion{2}\varphi{4}- tcimacro% beginexpansion endexpansion}}\varphi @xmath76 expression ( 9 ) contains divergent terms depend @xmath2 subtracted large exchange splitting @xmath77 parameter @xmath78 real energy function @xmath79 subtracting 9 ) terms depend angle obtain @xmath80 contribution expression ( 10 ) region @xmath81 small correction neglecting obtain expression ( 4 ) opposite limit small exchange splitting @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 coupling energy proportional @xmath85 @xmath86 calculating ( 11 ) zero temperature obtain ( 3 ) transition limits ( 10 ) 11 ) @xmath87 work supported russian fund fundamental research grant 01 - 02 - 17794
| 0.32578
| 2,016
| 1,024
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,498
|
we investigate a non - adiabatic parametric quantum pump consists of a nonmagnetic scattering region connected by two ferromagnetic leads .
the presence of ferromagnetic leads allows electrons with different spins to experience different potential landscape . using this effect
we propose a quantum spin pump that drives spin - up electrons to flow in one direction and spin - down electrons to flow in opposite direction . as a result ,
the spin pump can deliver a spin current with vanishing charge current .
a parametric quantum pump generates a dc electric current by a cyclic variation of system parameters while keeping the leads at a constant chemical potential@xcite .
considerable effort has been devoted to understand the physics of parametric pumping@xcite .
it was found that the pumped current is rather sensitive to various parameters of the system such as potential of the pump , frequency of the driving force , and fermi energy of the leads .
as parameters vary , the pumped current can even change directions : this has been predicted for charge pumping in resonant tunneling diodes@xcite , nanotube quantum pumps@xcite , finite frequency pumping process@xcite , and quantization of the pumped charge@xcite . to fully exploit this behavior , in this paper we investigate parametric pumping in the presence of ferromagnetic leads .
when ferromagnetic leads are present , electrons with different spins experience different potentials . under certain conditions
the pumped current for electron with different spin may flow in opposite directions . as a result , the total pumped charge current can be zero while a pure spin current is delivered .
such a quantum spin pump may have potential applications in the fascinating field of spintronics@xcite .
recently , several different spin pumps have been proposed . in the uni - pole spin battery studied in refs .
, a spin current is generated by either a rotating magnetic moment or rotating external magnetic field . in these uni - pole pumps , spin current
is not conserved due to spin flips@xcite .
in contrast , the spin pump considered in this work satisfies spin current conservation when magnetizations of the two leads are parallel or antiparallel . in another direction ,
an adiabatic quantum pump was proposed@xcite such that a spin polarized current is generated in a chaotic quantum dot in the presence of an in - plane magnetic field . in this work
we go beyond the adiabatic regime and examine the frequency dependence of the pumped spin current .
our results show that a pure spin current can be achieved by varying the pumping frequency .
the system we investigate is a spin - valve which consists of a non - magnetic scattering region connected by two ferromagnetic electrodes to the reservoir .
the magnetic moment @xmath0 of the left electrode is pointing to the @xmath1-direction , the electric current is flowing in the @xmath2-direction , while the moment of the right electrode is at an angle @xmath3 to the @xmath1-axis in the @xmath4 plane .
for simplicity of discussion , we assume that the value of molecular field @xmath5 is the same for the two electrodes , thus a standard spin - valve effect is obtained@xcite by varying the angle @xmath3 . essentially , @xmath5 mimics the difference of density of states ( dos ) between spin - up and down electrons@xcite in the electrodes .
the pumped current for this system can be calculated at finite frequency and up to the second order in pumping amplitude using the perturbation theory based on nonequilibrium green s functions@xcite .
the pumped particle current due to spin component @xmath6 through lead @xmath7 is found to be ( @xmath8)@xcite @xmath9 { \bf g}^a \right]_{\beta \beta } \label{eq8}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath10 , @xmath11 is the pumping potential profile@xcite , @xmath12 , and @xmath13 is a @xmath14 matrix representing the equilibrium retarded green s function @xmath15 with @xmath16 the hamiltonian in the absence of pumping potential . here @xmath17 is the self energy and @xmath18 $ ] is the linewidth function .
the self - energies are given@xcite @xmath19 with the rotational matrix @xmath20 for electrode @xmath7 defined as @xmath21 here angle @xmath22 is defined as @xmath23 and @xmath24 and @xmath25 is the usual self energy@xcite . in this paper
, we will study two special cases : @xmath26 or @xmath27 for spin current . from eq.([eq8 ] ) , we observe that up to the second order in pumping amplitude , the particle can absorb or emit a photon during the pumping process .
the contribution due to these two photon assisted processes have different sign and tend to cancel each other . as the result of this competition , the pumped particle current can reverse its direction upon varying system parameters . the pumped charge current @xmath28
is given by @xmath29 and the pumped spin current @xmath30 is ( we have set @xmath8 ) @xmath31 now we examine the conservation law for pumped current .
when @xmath32 , the @xmath14 green s function @xmath33 and self energy are diagonal . as a result
, we have @xmath34_{\beta \beta } \label{eq9}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have moved @xmath35 to the beginning of the trace .
this can be done only if the green s function and self energy are diagonal .
using the fact that @xmath36 and changing variable from @xmath37 to @xmath38 in the second term of eq.([eq9 ] ) , it is straightforward to show the @xmath39 .
this means that both the pumped electric current and pumped spin current are conserved in this device .
now we use eqs.([eq8 ] ) , ( [ ele ] ) , and ( [ spin ] ) to calculate pumped electric current and spin current .
the system we studied is a symmetric double @xmath40 barrier structure modeled by potential @xmath41 . for this system
the green s function @xmath42 can be calculated exactly@xcite .
the pumping potential is chosen to be sinusoidal @xmath43 $ ] .
we will calculate the pumped electric and spin current from the left lead at zero temperature and set @xmath44 .
we set @xmath45 and @xmath46 .
a gate voltage @xmath47 is applied in the double barrier structure to control the resonant electron level .
we assume that the fermi level of the leads is in line with the resonant level at @xmath48 .
finally the unit is set by @xmath49 . for the system of fe
/ ge / fe with @xmath50 , the energy unit is @xmath51 which corresponds to @xmath52 ghz .
the unit for pumped current is @xmath53a .
the unit for spin current is @xmath54 . in fig.1 , we show the pumped electric current ( solid line ) and spin current ( dotted line ) as a function pumping frequency when @xmath26 for fixed fermi energy and magnetization @xmath5 . as the frequency increases , the pumped electric current increases and reaches a maximum value at @xmath55 .
as the frequency increases further , the pumped electric current decrease and becomes negative at large frequency . in the presence of magnetic electrodes ,
the pumped electric current is spin polarized with non - zero spin current .
the behavior of the pumped spin current is similar to that of the pumped electric current .
it is positive at small pumping frequency and becomes negative at larger frequencies . at @xmath56 ( thin vertical line in fig.1 ) ,
the pumped electric current is zero and a pure spin current is achieved .
the physics behind this is the following . during parametric pumping ,
the system pumps out spin - up and spin - down electrons . for electron with a given fermi energy ,
the potential of the ferromagnetic lead for spin - up electron is @xmath57 while for spin - down electron it is @xmath5 . as a result ,
the pumped electric current for different spins can have different sign , _
i.e. _ spin - up electron pumps out from the right lead to the left whereas spin - down electron flows to the right lead during the pumping .
this way a spin current is generated .
at certain value of the frequency , a complete cancellation of electric current occurs and a pure spin current is delivered .
in fig.2 we plot the pumped electric current and spin current versus pumping frequency for @xmath58 .
we observe that the pumped electric current for @xmath26 has the same order of magnitude as that at @xmath58 .
the pumped spin current , however , is quite different from that at @xmath26 .
it displays a linear dependency on the pumping frequency .
the frequency at which a pure spin current occurs is also different from the case when @xmath26 . comparing with the case of @xmath26 ,
the spin current reverses its direction when @xmath58 .
our study shows that the pure spin current is a generic property and can occur at a wide range of parameters .
in fig.1 , we see that at @xmath59 and @xmath56 the system pumps out pure spin current . as we vary @xmath5 , the frequency @xmath60 at which the pure spin current occurs also changes .
the trajectory or the `` phase diagram '' is depicted in fig.3 where pumping frequency versus magnetization of the leads for @xmath26 is shown ( solid line ) along with the magnitude of pumped spin current . in summary
, we have proposed a non - adiabatic quantum spin pump which can generate a pure spin current with zero electric current during the parametric pumping .
the device consists of a non - magnetic system connected by two ferromagnetic leads . since electrons with different spin experience different potential landscape ,
the corresponding pumped current can be quite different . at certain condition ,
the pumped electric current can be zero while pure spin current is produced .
our numerical results show that this can be easily achieved by varying system parameters such as the pumping frequency .
|
we gratefully acknowledge support by a rgc grant from the sar government of hong kong under grant number hku 7113/02p and from nserc of canada and fcar of quebec ( h.g ) .
m. julliere , phys .
lett . a * 54 * , 225 ( 1975 ) ; r. meservey and p.m. tedrow , phys . rep . * 238 * , 173 ( 1994 ) ; j.s .
moodera et al , phys .
lett . * 74 * , 3273 ( 1995 ) ; g.a .
prinz , science , * 282 * , 1660 ( 1998 ) ; h. mehrez et al , phys .
lett . * 84 * , 2682 ( 2000 ) ; a. wolf et al , science * 294 * , 1488 ( 2001 ) .
|
acknowledge support rgc grant sar government hong kong grant hku 7113/02p nserc canada fcar quebec m. julliere phys . lett 54 225 1975 ) r meservey p tedrow phys . 238 173 1994 ) j moodera . lett 74 3273 1995 ) prinz science 282 1660 1998 ) h mehrez . lett 84 2682 2000 ) wolf science 294 1488 2001 )
| 0.069141
| 202
| 114
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,500
|
we give a simple proof of guillemin s theorem on the determination of the magnetic field on the torus by the spectrum of the corresponding schrdinger operator .
|
this note is on inverse spectral theory for the schrdinger operator on a flat two - dimensional torus with electric and magnetic potentials
. this problem can be remarkably rigid . for generic flat tori ,
if the variation of the magnetic field is strictly less than its mean , and the total magnetic flux on the torus is @xmath0 , then the spectrum of the schrdinger operator determines both the electric and magnetic fields .
this is in marked contrast to both the schrdinger operator without a magnetic field ( see [ 3 ] ) and the case of a magnetic field of mean zero ( see [ 1 ] ) . in both those problems
there are large families of isospectral fields , and rigidity results are much more difficult to obtain ( see also [ 2 ] ) .
the observation that there can be spectral rigidity when the total flux is @xmath0 is due to guillemin ( [ 5 ] ) .
here we give a short proof of the slightly stronger result stated above . instead of thinking of the hamiltonian as acting on functions with values in a line bundle over the torus @xmath1 ,
we think of the hamiltonian as acting on functions on @xmath2 which are invariant with respect to the magnetic translations " associated to @xmath3 . however , these two settings are completely equivalent .
our assumption that the variation of the magnetic field @xmath4 is strictly less than its mean @xmath5 takes the simple form @xmath6 for all @xmath7 .
the spectrum of the laplacian plus lower order perturbations on flat tori has the feature that there are large families of spectral invariants corresponding to sets of geodesics with a fixed length . in analogy with results on @xmath8 guillemin proposed the name band invariants " for these families .
the nice feature of the problem discussed here is that only the simplest of the band invariants are needed to prove rigidity .
the first complete solution of an inverse spectral problem was mark krein s definitive analysis of the weighted string " , [ 9 ] , [ 10 ] . since that time many other inverse spectral problems in one space dimension
have been solved ( see [ 11 ] ) . in higher dimensions
it is widely believed that , modulo natural symmetries and deformations like gauge transformation , most problems will be spectrally rigid
. however , so far there have been relatively few settings where this has been proven ( for instance those in [ 6 ] and [ 14 ] ) and many interesting examples where it fails ( see [ 12 ] and [ 4 ] ) .
this should remain an active field of research for many years to come , and one can reasonably say that it began with the work of mark grigorevich krein .
.2 in we begin with the smooth magnetic field @xmath9 , periodic with respect to the lattice @xmath3 in two dimensions , expanded in a fourier series in terms of the dual lattice @xmath10
@xmath11 for this magnetic field we introduce the magnetic potential @xmath12 with @xmath13 , chosen to be as periodic as possible , i.e. @xmath14 we also have a mean zero periodic electric field which is the gradient of the mean zero periodic potential @xmath15 the quantum hamiltonian for an electron in these fields ( with all physical constants set to 1 ) is @xmath16 .1 in let @xmath17 be a fundamental domain for @xmath3 . to define the domain of @xmath18 as an operator in @xmath19 we will use magnetic translation operators " ( see [ 13 ] ) .
letting @xmath20 and @xmath21 be a basis for @xmath3 and the corresponding dual basis for @xmath10 , define for linearly independent vectors @xmath22 and @xmath23 @xmath24 then the commutator @xmath25 $ ] is given by @xmath26u(x)=(e^{iv_2\cdot e_1}-e^{iv_1\cdot e_2})e^{i(v_1+v_2)\cdot x}u(x+e_1+e_2),\ ] ] and the periodicity of @xmath27 and @xmath28 implies that the commutator @xmath29 $ ] is given by @xmath30u(x)=e^{iv_j\cdot x}((i\partial_x+a(x)+a^0(e_j))^2-(i\partial_x+a(x)-v_j)^2)u(x+e_j).\ ] ] thus , in order for the @xmath31 s to commute with @xmath18 we require @xmath32 , and in order for the @xmath31 s to commute with each other we require @xmath33 for some integer @xmath34 .
note that this implies @xmath35 and @xmath36 and @xmath37 , and @xmath38 is the total magnetic flux .
hence the assumption @xmath39 is equivalent to nonzero flux , and it implies @xmath40 . defining the domain of @xmath18 to be the subspace of @xmath41 such that @xmath42 , we make @xmath18 a self - adjoint operator in @xmath19 . .1 in as in many previous works we will look for spectral invariants for @xmath18 by studying the wave trace .
letting @xmath43 be the distribution kernel for the fundamental solution for the initial value problem @xmath44 the distribution kernel for the corresponding initial value problem in @xmath45 is @xmath46 where the operators @xmath31 act on the @xmath7 variable .
note that , since the principal part of @xmath47 is @xmath48 , @xmath49 when @xmath50 and the sum in is has only a finite number of nonzero terms for @xmath51 in a bounded interval .
thus @xmath25=0 $ ] implies @xmath52 .
the fundamental spectral invariant for this problem is the distribution trace of the operator @xmath53 corresponding to the kernel @xmath54 .
conventionally ( with all terms to be interpreted in distribution sense ) this is written @xmath55 .1 in to avoid degeneracies in the contributions to @xmath56 from the terms in ( 1 ) , we assume that vectors in @xmath3 have distinct lengths , i.e. @xmath57 since @xmath43 is singular as a distribution in @xmath58 only when @xmath59 , it now follows that the singularity of @xmath56 at @xmath60 comes from just two terms @xmath61dx .
% \eqno{(2)}\ ] ] to determine the spectral invariants coming from the leading terms in the expansion of this singularity it is convenient to use the hadamard - hrmander expansion [ 7 ] , [ 8 ] for @xmath43 .
beginning with the forward fundamental solution , @xmath62 , defined by @xmath63 and @xmath64 for @xmath65 one has @xmath66 where @xmath67 is chosen so that @xmath68 for @xmath69 and @xmath70 is the forward fundamental solution for @xmath48 . in two space dimensions
this means @xmath71 for @xmath72 , @xmath73 for @xmath65 .
for @xmath74 the distribution @xmath75 is defined by @xmath76 for @xmath77 and @xmath78 for @xmath79 .
hence the coefficients @xmath80 are determined by the recursion @xmath81 where @xmath18 acts in the variable @xmath7 . solving this with the requirement that @xmath82 , we have where @xmath85 is determined by @xmath86 . the fundamental solution @xmath43 is given by @xmath87 .1 in
we define @xmath88 and @xmath89e^{i(2a^0(x)\cdot d-\int_0 ^ 1d\cdot a^1(x+sd)ds)}dx.\ ] ] from - one sees that @xmath90 and @xmath91 are spectral invariants for @xmath18 .
however , the periodicity implies that @xmath92 and @xmath93 .
.1 in the rest of this article is devoted to studying @xmath94 and @xmath95 .
we have @xmath96 , @xmath97 and gcd(@xmath98)=1 .
let @xmath99 .
then we have @xmath100 since @xmath101 when @xmath102 , the terms in the fourier series for @xmath27 which contribute to @xmath94 have @xmath103 , and this implies @xmath104 hence , @xmath105 , and @xmath94 reduces to @xmath106 defining @xmath107 ( note that @xmath108 ) , we have @xmath109 extending @xmath110 to a basis for @xmath111 , and letting @xmath112 be the dual basis for @xmath3 , we make the change of variables @xmath113 , and choose @xmath114 then we have @xmath115 where @xmath116 is the jacobian factor , and only depends on @xmath117 . since we have this spectral invariant for all @xmath118 , it follows that @xmath119 is a spectral invariant for any function @xmath120 which can be expanded in terms of @xmath121 , i.e. for any @xmath122 which has period @xmath123 . since @xmath128 ,
the hypotheses imply that the derivative of @xmath129 is strictly positive and the inverse function @xmath130 to @xmath131 is defined on the range of @xmath132 for @xmath133 $ ] . since @xmath134 has period 1 , the range is @xmath135 $ ] .
letting @xmath120 in tend to the @xmath110-function at @xmath136 , the limit of is @xmath137 if @xmath138 for @xmath133 $ ] .
if @xmath139 for @xmath133 $ ] then the limit of is @xmath140 , where @xmath141 , and @xmath142 . in other words taking these limits
we recover a function of period 1 in @xmath136 which agrees with @xmath137 on @xmath143 .
thus we recover @xmath144 modulo an additive constant , and we obtain @xmath145 by taking the derivative . since we can carry out this argument for all prime elements @xmath146 , we recover the full fourier expansion of @xmath9 .
we now turn to the recovery of @xmath28 .
the preceding analysis shows that , keeping the same @xmath147 as above , the spectral invariant @xmath95 , modulo terms determined by @xmath86 , reduces to @xmath148 where @xmath149 this immediately gives the following : since we are assuming the hypotheses of theorem [ theo:2.1 ] , we have the function @xmath130 and can make the substitution @xmath150 in . that gives @xmath151 but , since @xmath152
, we can extend @xmath130 smoothly to the whole line by defining @xmath153 .
thus , since @xmath154 has period 1 in @xmath155 , we have @xmath156 since we have this spectral invariant for @xmath157 , we recover the fourier series of @xmath158 , and , hence , since @xmath130 is determined by @xmath159 , we have @xmath154 . as before , since we can carry out this argument for all prime elements @xmath146 , we recover the full fourier expansion of @xmath28 .
if @xmath160 , for the lattice @xmath3 , then @xmath124 for the lattice @xmath161 generated by @xmath162 and @xmath163 when @xmath164 .
so if @xmath4 and @xmath165 are periodic with respect to @xmath161 , theorems 1 and 2 apply in the sense that the spectrum of @xmath18 on the torus @xmath166 determines @xmath4 and @xmath165 .
note that @xmath4 and @xmath165 will automatically be periodic with respect to @xmath161 when @xmath167 .
equation with periodic vector potential , comm .
. phys . * 125 * ( 1989 ) , 263 - 300 g.eskin , j.ralston , inverse spectral problems in rectangular domains , commun .
32*(2007 ) , 971 - 1000 .
g.eskin , j.ralston , e.trubowitz , on isospectral periodic potentials in @xmath168 , i and ii , commun .
pure and appl .
37*(1984 ) , 647 - 676,715 - 753 .
c.gordon , survey of isospectral manifolds , _ handbook of differential geometry_,volume 1 ( 2000 ) , north holland , 747 - 778 .
v.guillemin , inverse spectral results on two - dimensional tori , journal of the ams , * 3*(1990),375 - 387 .
v.guillemin , d.kazdhan , some inverse spectral results for negatively curved 2-manifolds , topology * 19*(1980 ) , 301 - 312 .
j.hadamard , _ le problme de cauchy et les equations aux drives partielles linaires hyperboliques , _ hermann , paris ( 1932 ) l.hrmander , _ the analysis of linear partial differential operators , iii , _ springer - verlag , vienna ( 1985 ) m.krein , solution of the inverse sturm - liouville problem ( russian ) , doklady akad .
nauk sssr ( n.s.)*76*(1951 ) , 21 - 24 .
m.krein , determination of the density of a nonhomogeneous cord by its frequency spectrum.doklady akad .
nauk sssr ( n.s.)*76*(1951 ) , 345 - 348 .
marchenko , _ operatory shturma liuvilli i ikh prilozheni _ , naukova dumka , kiev ( 1977 ) t.sunada , riemannian coverings and isospectral manifolds , ann . of math .
* 121*(1985 ) , 169 - 186 .
j.zak , dynamics of electrons in solids in external fields , phys
. rev . * 168*(1968 ) , 686 - 695 s.zelditch , spectral determination of analytic , bi - axisymmetric plane domains , geometric funct .
10*(2000 ) , 628 - 677 .
|
note on inverse spectral theory schrdinger operator on flat two - dimensional torus with electric magnetic potentials problem rigid for generic flat tori if variation magnetic field less than mean total magnetic flux @xmath0 spectrum schrdinger operator determines electric magnetic fields contrast to schrdinger operator without magnetic field magnetic field of mean zero 1 large families of isospectral fields rigidity results difficult spectral rigidity when total flux @xmath0 due to guillemin ( 5 ] ) short proof stronger result hamiltonian acting on functions values line bundle over torus @xmath1 on functions on @xmath2 invariant magnetic translations @xmath3 two settings equivalent assumption variation magnetic field @xmath4 less than mean @xmath5 takes simple form @xmath6 for all @xmath7 spectrum of laplacian plus lower order perturbations on flat tori large families of spectral invariants to geodesics fixed length analogy guillemin proposed name band invariants for families simplest band invariants needed to prove rigidity first complete solution of inverse spectral problem was mark krein s analysis of weighted stringinverse spectral problems space dimension solved ( see [ 11 ] higher dimensions believed modulo natural symmetries deformations gauge transformation problems spectrally rigid few settings proven [ 6 ] [ 14 ] many examples see [ 12 ] [ 4 ] active field research began with work mark grigorevich krein begin with smooth magnetic field @xmath9 periodic lattice @xmath3 two dimensions expanded fourier series dual lattice @xmath10 @xmath11 introduce magnetic potential @xmath12 with @xmath13 periodic @xmath14 mean zero periodic electric field gradient of mean zero periodic potential @xmath15 quantum hamiltonian for electron 1 is @xmath16 @xmath17 fundamental domain for @xmath3 define domain of @xmath18 @xmath19 use magnetic translation operators see [ 13 ] )@xmath20 basis for @xmath3 dual basis @xmath10 independent vectors @xmath22 commutator @xmath25 given by @xmath26u(x)=(e^{iv_2(v_1+v_2)+e_1+e_2) periodicity @xmath27 @xmath28 implies commutator @xmath29 given by @xmath30u(x)=e^{iv_j\cdot x}\partial_x+a_j^2-_x+a(x-v_j)^2)u(x+e @xmath31 s commute @xmath18 require @xmath32 @xmath33 integer @xmath34 implies @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 total magnetic flux @xmath39 equivalent nonzero flux implies @xmath40 domain @xmath18 subspace @xmath41 @xmath18 self - adjoint operator in @xmath19 spectral invariants for @xmath18 studying wave trace @xmath43 distribution kernel fundamental solution initial value problem @xmath44 distribution kernel initial value problem @xmath45 @xmath46 operators @xmath31 act on @xmath7 variableprincipal part @xmath47 is @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 finite nonzero terms for @xmath51 interval @xmath25=0 implies @xmath52 fundamental spectral invariant is distribution trace operator @xmath53 kernel @xmath54 written @xmath55 degeneracies vectors in @xmath3 have distinct lengths @xmath57 @xmath43 singular @xmath58 @xmath59 singularity of @xmath56 at @xmath60 from two terms @xmath61dx determine spectral invariants from leading terms hadamard - hrmander expansion [ 7 8 for @xmath43 forward fundamental solution @xmath62 defined by @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 chosen @xmath68 for @xmath69 @xmath70 forward fundamental solution for @xmath48 @xmath71 for @xmath72 @xmath73 for @xmath65 @xmath74 distribution @xmath75 defined by @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 for @xmath79 coefficients @xmath80 determined by recursion @xmath81 @xmath18 acts variable @xmath7 @xmath85 determined by @xmath86fundamental solution @xmath43 by @xmath87 define @xmath88 @xmath90 @xmath91 spectral invariants for @xmath18 periodicity implies @xmath92 @xmath93 article @xmath94 @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97@xmath98)=1 @xmath99 @xmath100 since @xmath101 @xmath102 terms fourier series @xmath27 @xmath94 have @xmath103 implies @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath94 reduces to @xmath106 defining @xmath107 @xmath109 extending @xmath110 basis for @xmath111 @xmath112 dual basis for @xmath3 change of variables @xmath113 choose @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath116 jacobian factor depends on @xmath117 spectral invariant for @xmath118 @xmath119 invariant for function @xmath120 @xmath121 @xmath122 @xmath128 hypotheses imply derivative of @xmath129 positive inverse function @xmath130 to @xmath131 defined on range of @xmath132 @xmath133 @xmath134 has period 1 range is @xmath135@xmath120 @xmath110-function at @xmath136 limit @xmath137 if @xmath138 for @xmath133 @xmath139 @xmath133 limit @xmath140 @xmath141 @xmath142 recover function period 1 in @xmath136 agrees with @xmath137 on @xmath143 recover @xmath144 additive constant obtain @xmath145 derivative prime elements @xmath146 recover full fourier expansion @xmath9 recovery @xmath28 analysis @xmath147 spectral invariant @xmath95 @xmath86 reduces to @xmath148 @xmath149 assuming hypotheses theorem function @xmath130 substitution @xmath150 gives @xmath151 extend @xmath130 whole line defining @xmath153 @xmath154 has period 1 in @xmath155 have @xmath156 spectral invariant @xmath157 recover fourier series of @xmath158 @xmath130 determined by @xmath159 have @xmath154 all prime elements @xmath146 recover full fourier expansion of @xmath28 @xmath160 lattice @xmath3 @xmath124 for lattice @xmath161 generated by @xmath162 and @xmath163 @xmath164@xmath4 periodic @xmath161 theorems 1 2 apply spectrum @xmath18 @xmath166 determines @xmath4 @xmath4 periodic @xmath161 @xmath167 equation periodic vector potential 125 1989 ) 263 - 300.eskin.ralston inverse spectral problems rectangular domains 32*(2007 ) 971 - 1000.trubowitz isospectral periodic potentials @xmath168 37*(1984 ) 647 - 676,715 - 753.gordon survey isospectral manifolds handbook differential geometry 1 2000 747 -.guillemin inverse spectral results two - dimensional tori journal ams 3*(1990),375 - 387.kazdhan inverse spectral results negatively curved 2-manifolds topology 19*(1980 ) 301 - 312.hadamard problme de cauchy equations drives partielles linaires hyperboliques hermann paris 1932.hrmander analysis linear partial differential operators springer - verlag vienna 1985.krein inverse sturm - liouville problem*76*(1951 ) 21 - 24 krein determination density nonhomogeneous cord frequency spectrum*76*(1951 ) 345 - 348 marchenko naukova dumka kiev 1977 riemannian coverings isospectral manifolds math 121*(1985 ) 169 - 186 dynamics electrons solids external fields phys 168*(1968 ) - 695 spectral determination bi - axisymmetric plane domains geometric funct 10*(2000 ) 628 - 677
| 0.495615
| 3,191
| 1,756
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,502
|
the primordial universe can be used as a laboratory to set constraints on quantum gravity . in the framework of loop quantum cosmology ,
we show that such a proposal for quantum gravity not only solves for the big bang singularity issu but also naturally generates inflation .
thanks to a quantitative computation of the amount of gravity waves produced in the loopy early universe , we show that future cosmological datas on the polarized anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background can be used to probe lqc model of the universe . [
[ methodological - introduction ] ] methodological introduction + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + building a quantum theory of gravity is probably the most outstanding problem of modern physics , but remains also one of the most difficult task .
facing such a great challenge and retrospectively , looking at the many attempts developped since the last decades one could be tempted to consider that searching for quantum gravity is a never ending quest and that the wise attitude would be to withdraw such a challenge .
however , quantum gravity is not _ optional _ !
several heuristic arguments pin down the necessity of a successful building of quantum gravity @xcite .
more importantly , the singularity theorems derived by penrose and hawking @xcite shows that general relativity ontologically fails : a way out reconciling quantum mechanics and general relativity is mandatory ! a new physical paradigm is needed and , to be successful , such a potentially new paradigm requires a well - established theoretical framework . on the one hand
, this assumes a well - posed theoretical problem namely how to quantize general relativity or , alternatively , how to gravitize quantum field theory ?
many tentative theories have been proposed such as string theory @xcite and loop quantum gravity ( lqg ) @xcite to mention the most popular ones , and though some of them have made great progresses , none of them is fully setted up . on the other hand ,
this also implies a new kind of paradigmatic experiments or observations .
this is a mandatory step to discriminate theoretical proposals which are deeply on the wrong track from those which are not , as well as to guide theoretical developments .
this well - posed phenomenological and experimental problem is the second main difficulty of quantum gravity as quantum gravitational effects should pop up at an energy scale of @xmath0 gev , far beyond any high energy physics experiments .
fortunately , the failure of general relativity precisely points towards those phenomena potentially probing quantum gravity : space - time singularities provide the territory for quantum gravity and one therefore has to search for those phenomena built up of singular space - times .
this qualifies the primordial universe , being the neighborhood of the big bang singularity , as an ideal territory for probing quantum gravity ! observing quantum gravity
is therefore splitted into two questions .
how a given proposal for quantum gravity affects the physics of the primordial universe _ and _ how can we probe the physics of the primordial universe ?
apparently , the second question points towards observation .
but , as a theoretical question , this should not be overlooked since it strongly determined the precise implementation of the first question the main requirement for a quantum gravity proposal is to solve for the pathological big bang singularities and this can be checked by computing the global evolution of the universe in a quantum cosmological setting .
however , it should be stressed out that such a global evolution can not be probed directly as one can not extract himself from the universe to see how it evolves in its primary ages .
we are stuck inside the universe and , from the inside , we are able to probe the physics of the early universe via the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) anisotropies .
the origin of such anisotropies are _ cosmological perturbations _ produced during a phase of accelerated expansion dubbed _
cosmic inflation_. inflation is a key ingredient of the standard cosmological paradigm as it solves for the horizon and flatness problems and provides a mechanism for generating perturbations , the primordial seeds for galaxies and large scale structures formation .
moreover , inflation could be a high energetic phenomenon ( its energy scale could be as high as @xmath1 gev ) and is therefore potentially affected by quantum gravity . nevertheless , the inflationnary scenario is not free of any problems as it is very difficult to generate such a phase without invoking speculative physics or fine tuning .
bridging a link between loop quantum cosmology ( lqc ) the cosmological implementation of lqg @xcite and inflation in the early universe allows us to solve for the big bang singularity _ and _ to naturally trig a phase of inflation .
in addition , a quantitative computation of cosmological perturbations produced in such a _ loopy _ universe makes the early universe a potential laboratory for testing quantum gravity . our methodology is the following .
the evolution of the universe is derived in the framework of _ effective _ lqc which includes first order quantum corrections coming from holonomies . on top of that modified cosmological background
, we will quantitatively compute the amount of cosmological perturbations of tensor type ( _ i.e. _ primordial gravity waves ) and investigate how it impacts on the @xmath2-mode angular power spectrum of cmb anisotropies .
such an angular power spectrum is the main observable and can finally be used to forecast how future cmb observations could be used to probe lqc .
we consider the early universe to be filled with a massive scalar field @xmath3 as matter sources and our time variable is cosmic time @xmath4 . [ [ background - evolution ] ] background evolution + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + with holonomy corrections at first order , the modifed friedman and klein - gordon equations are ( denoting @xmath5 the hubble parameter and @xmath6 the mass of the scalar field ) : @xmath7 where @xmath8 is a critical energy density which can not be overcomed and which encodes lqc corrections . because of @xmath9 , the universe is not singular as the big bang is now replaced by a big bounce .
the basical history of the universe is thus a contracting phase , followed by an expanding phase .
the _ regular _
transition from the contracting phase to the expanding one is ensured by the quantum corrections and the bounce occurs at @xmath10 .
more interestingly , this peculiar evolution of the universe naturally leads to inflation ! indeed , a phase of accelerated expansion can start right after the bounce if the scalar field is in the appropriate energy state for the slow - roll conditions to be fulfilled .
for a massive field , this is translated into @xmath11 with @xmath12 denoting some time _
after _ the bounce
. this condition is not easily met in the standard cosmological scenario .
but in the lqc bouncing universe , the hubble parameter @xmath13 is negative valued during contraction .
it therefore acts as an _ anti - friction _ term making @xmath3 to climb up its potential .
right after the bounce , it appears that such a field is precisely in the appropriate energy setting for a sufficiently long phase of inflation to start @xcite .
the key point about this scenario has been raised by ashtekar and sloan who showed that generating a phase of inflation in the lqc universe with the mandatory amount of at least 60 e - folds is very close to unity , making inflation rather natural in this framework @xcite .
[ [ cmb - power - spectra ] ] cmb power spectra + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + to derive the amount of gravity waves produced at the end of inflation , one needs to solve the following equation describing tensor perturbations evolving on top of the modified flrw background : @xmath14 where the last term , acting as a time - dependant mass term , encodes the quantum deformation of the background .
this equation of motion @xcite has been derived from an algebra which is anomaly - free at all orders and can be safely used throughout the entire history of the bouncing universe .
the main characteristics of a bouncy power spectrum for tensor modes are the following .
the ir ( large scales ) part is @xmath15 suppressed .
this is due to the freezing of very large - scale modes in the minkowski vacuum .
those modes indeed exit the horizon long _ before _ the bounce and naturally exhibit a quadratic spectrum .
the uv part is identical to the standard prediction .
small scales indeed experience a history basically similar to that of the big bang scenario .
they exit the horizon during inflation and reenter later , leading to the standard nearly scale - invariant spectrum .
intermediate scales , around @xmath16 , exhibit both a bump of amplitude @xmath17 and damped oscillations shape to its nearly scale - invariant shape ) is a phenomenological parameter related to @xmath6 and to the fraction of potential energy at the time of the bounce .
similarly , @xmath17 is a phenomenological parameter related to @xmath6 ( see @xcite for further details ) . ] .
this is mostly due to the fact that all modes are inevitably in causal contact at the bounce ( the hubble parameter vanishes , therefore leading to an infinite hubble radius ) .
those characteristics have been fully determined by numerically solving the equations of motion of tensor perturbations propagating in the lqc - corrected , \{bouncing+inflationary } universe @xcite .
@xmath2-mode angular power spectrum ( left panel ) and detectable region of the parameters @xmath18 describing a loopy universe ( right panel ) .
figure adapted from @xcite . ] using a boltzmann code , such a primordial tensor power spectrum serves as an input for computing the footprints of primordial gravity waves on the cmb @xmath2-mode angular power spectrum ( see left panel of fig .
[ fig ] ) . as compared to the standard prediction
, the distortion of lqc @xmath2-mode power spectrum depends on the value of @xmath19 @xcite .
( roughly speaking , the suppression of power at large scales can be seen in the cmb only for values of @xmath19 corresponding to scales _ smaller _ than the hubble horizon today . )
if @xmath20 corresponding to a length scale greater than the hubble scale today , the tail of the bump for @xmath21 translates into a slight bump at large angular scales ( _ i.e. _ small values of the multipole @xmath22 ) .
however , for @xmath23 , the @xmath2-mode angular spectrum shows , as compared to the standard prediction , a suppression at large angular scales due to the suppression at large length scales in the primordial spectrum and a bump at intermediate angular scales @xmath24 . finally , if @xmath19 is greater than @xmath25 mpc@xmath26 , the suppression is effective up to @xmath22-values of a few hundreds and the primordial part of the @xmath2-mode is therefore systematically pushed below the lensing - induced @xmath2-mode . using those angular power spectra as an observational probe and considering both the instrumental noise as expected for a future dedicated @xmath2-mode experimentk - arcmin . , the beam width to 8 arcmin . and the sky fraction to 70% . ] and the lensing - induced @xmath2-mode as a foreground masking the detection of primordial @xmath2-mode
, one can forecast some constraints to be set on the fundamental parameters describing the lqc model of the universe @xcite .
the detectable values at 1-@xmath27 of the mass of the scalar field @xmath6 and its fraction of potential energy at the bounce , denoted @xmath28 , are depicted by the blue band in the right panel of fig .
[ fig ] .
this roughly corresponds to a detectable range of @xmath19 from @xmath29 mpc@xmath26 to @xmath30 mpc@xmath26 considering _ degeneracies _ with other cosmological parameters .
the upper part is not detectable as it corresponds to @xmath31 making the @xmath2-mode power spectrum _ undistorted _ as compared to the standard general relativistic prediction .
the lower part is not detectable as it corresponds to @xmath32 making the primordial @xmath2-mode systematically smaller than the lensing - induced part .
though measurements of the lqc parameters is not possible in this second case , a discrimination with pure general relativity is still possible as the suppression induced by the bounce is seen via the masking of the primordial @xmath2-mode .
however in the precise case of lqc , the three parameters @xmath33 , @xmath19 and @xmath17 are fully determined by the _ two _ parameters @xmath6 and @xmath28 , thus breaking the degeneracy between @xmath19 and @xmath33 ( see @xcite for details ) . ] ; that is via its _ non - detection_. [ [ conclusion ] ] conclusion + + + + + + + + + + + lqg offers an appealing approach to build a quantum theory of gravity .
its implementation to the symmetry reduced case of flrw metric describing our whole universe shows that the big bang singularity is cured and that inflation is _ naturally _ triggered .
moreover , thanks to a quantitative computation of gravity waves produced in the early universe , subsequently impacting on the cmb polarized anisotropies of @xmath2-type , a possible window to constraint those loopy models of the universe using cosmological datas is now opened .
as stressed out in @xcite , the case of lqc illustrates a possible future way to test for quantum gravity using cosmological / astronomical observations .
the author warmly thanks his collaborators aurlien barrau , thomas cailleteau and jakub mielczarek .
|
20 oriti d ( ed . )
2009 _ quantum gravity _ ( cambridge university press ) ; birrell n & davies p ( 1982 ) _ quantum field in curved space _
( cambrdige university press ) hawking s & ellis g ( 1973 ) _ the large scale structure of space - time _ ( cambridge university press ) green m , schwarz j & witten e 1987 _ superstring theory _ ( cambridge university press )
rovelli c ( 2007 ) _ quantum gravity _
( cambridge university press ) ; rovelli c 1998 _ living rev .
relativity _ * 1 * 1 ; smolin l 2004 _ preprint _ hep - th/0408048v3 ; thiemann t 2003 _ lect .
notes phys . _
* 631 * 41 ; perez a 2004 _ preprint _ gr - qc/0409061v3 ; dona p & speziale s 2010 _ preprint _
1007.0402v1 bojowald m 2008 _ living rev .
rel . _ * 11 * 4 ; ashtekar a 2009 _ gen .
grav . _ * 41 * 707 mielczarek j , cailleteau t , grain j & barrau a 2010 _ phys .
d _ * 81 * 104049 ashtekar a & sloan d 2010 _ phys .
b _ * 694 * 108 ; ashtekar a & sloan d 2010 _ gen .
grav . _ * 43 * 3619 bojowald m & hossain g 2008 _ phys .
d _ * 77 * 023508 grain j , barrau a , cailleteau t & mielczarek j 2010 _ phys.rev .
d _ * 82 * 123520 barrau a & grain j , _ preprint 1206.1192v1 _ mielczarek j , cailleteau t , barrau a & grain j , to be published in _ class . quant . grav . _
( _ prepint _
1106.3744v1 ) ; cailleteau t , mielczarek j , barrau a & grain j , to be published in _ class .
( _ preprint _
1111.3535v2 ) bojowald
m & paily g m , _ preprint 1112.1899v1 _
|
oriti d 2009 quantum gravity cambridge university press birrell davies p 1982 quantum field curved space hawking s ellis g 1973 large scale structure space - time green schwarz witten 1987 superstring theory rovelli c 2007 quantum gravity rovelli 1998 living rev relativity smolin l 2004 preprint hep - th/0408048v3 thiemann t 2003 notes. 631 * 41 perez a 2004 gr - qc/0409061v3 dona p speziale s 2010 preprint 1007.0402v1 bojowald m 2008 living rev . rel. 11 ashtekar a 2009 gen grav 41 * 707 mielczarek j cailleteau t grain j barrau 2010 . 81 * 104049 ashtekar sloan d 2010. 694 * 108 sloan 43 * 3619 bojowald m hossain g 2008 . 77 * 023508 grain j barrau cailleteau t mielczarek j 2010.rev 82 * 123520 barrau grain j preprint 1206.1192v1 cailleteau quant grav 1106.3744v1 cailleteau t mielczarek barrau grain 1111.bojowald paily preprint 1112.1899v1
| 0.128988
| 568
| 323
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,505
|
diagonal and off - diagonal properties of 2d solid @xmath0he systems doped with a quantized vortex have been investigated via the shadow path integral ground state method using the fixed - phase approach .
the chosen approximate phase induces the standard onsager - feynman flow field . in this approximation
the vortex acts as a static external potential and the resulting hamiltonian can be treated exactly with quantum monte carlo methods .
the vortex core is found to sit in an interstitial site and a very weak relaxation of the lattice positions away from the vortex core position has been observed .
also other properties like bragg peaks in the static structure factor or the behavior of vacancies are very little affected by the presence of the vortex .
we have computed also the one - body density matrix in perfect and defected @xmath0he crystals finding that the vortex has no sensible effect on the off - diagonal long range tail of the density matrix . within the assumed onsager feynman phase
, we find that a quantized vortex can not auto - sustain itself unless a condensate is already present like when dislocations are present .
it remains to be investigated if backflow can change this conclusion .
quantized vortices are one of the most genuine manifestation of the presence of superfluidity in many body quantum systems , but from the microscopic point of view no complete understanding of them has been reached yet .
recently quantized vortices have been related to the supersolidity issue @xcite ; in fact , arguments in favor of a vortex phase in low temperature solid @xmath0he , preceding the supersolid transition , are appeared in literature @xcite . with respect to this possible connection one of the fundamental questions to be answered
is : what does a quantum vortex look like in solid helium from a microscopic point of view ? dealing with vortices is a really hard task for microscopic methods , and it calls for some approximations or assumptions [ 5 - 10 ] .
in fact , the wave function has to be an eigenstate of the angular momentum , so it needs a phase .
following the well established routine for the ground state , once chosen a variational ansatz for the wave function , one could be tempted to correct it by means of exact zero temperature quantum monte carlo ( qmc ) techniques .
unfortunately this is actually not possible because of the sign problem that affects qmc methods .
the most followed recipe is to improve the variational description via qmc , but releasing the exactness of the methods in favor of approximations that allow to avoid the sign problem , like for example fixed phase @xcite or fixed nodes @xcite .
we study here the properties of a single vortex in solid @xmath0he via the shadow - pigs ( spigs ) method with fixed phase approximation .
the many - body wave function can be written as @xmath1 , where @xmath2 is a many - body phase , @xmath3 is the modulus of the wave function and @xmath4 are the coordinates of the @xmath5 particles .
@xmath6 describes a quantum state of the system if it is a solution of the time independent schrdinger equation : from @xmath7 it is possible to obtain two coupled differential equations for @xmath2 and for @xmath3 .
the fixed phase approximation consists in assuming the functional form of @xmath8 as given and to solve the equation @xmath9\psi_0(r ) = e\psi_0(r).\ ] ] for @xmath3 . solving ( [ schreff ] )
is equivalent to solve the original time independent schrdinger equation for the @xmath5-particle with an extra potential term @xmath10 .
the simplest choice for the phase is the well known onsager - feynman ( of ) phase @xcite : @xmath11 ( where @xmath12 is the angular polar coordinate of the @xmath13-th particle ) .
@xmath6 is an eigenstate of the @xmath14 component of the angular momentum operator @xmath15 with eigenvalue @xmath16 , being @xmath17 the quantum of circulation .
this choice for @xmath2 gives rise to the standard of flow field : in fact the extra - potential in ( [ schreff ] ) reads @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the radial polar coordinate of the @xmath13-th particle . in order to sustain a quantized vortex
, the system should display a macroscopic phase coherence , and at @xmath20 k this means that solid @xmath0he should house a bose - einstein condensate ( bec ) .
it is known from qmc results that no bec is present in the perfect crystal [ 12 - 15 ] , but if the vortex turns out to be able to induce a bec it could be a self - sustaining excitation . on the other hand , it is largely accepted that defects are able to induce bec @xcite , and then a defected crystal can safely sustain a quantized vortex . here
we report on the study of a two dimensional ( 2d ) @xmath0he crystal with and without dislocations .
in fact , dislocations can be included in the 2d crystal without imposing boundary constraints @xcite .
moreover the 2d system allows to reach large distances keeping the number of particle in the simulation at a tractable level , and this is a desirable feature when interested in off - diagonal properties of the system .
we face the task of solving ( [ schreff ] ) with the extra - potential given by ( [ pot ] ) when @xmath21 with the spigs method @xcite , which allows to obtain the lowest eigenstate of a given hamiltonian by projecting in imaginary time a swf @xcite taken as trial wave function .
the spigs method is unbiased by the choice of the trial wave function and the only inputs are the interparticle potential and the approximation for the imaginary time propagator @xcite . as he - he interatomic potential we have considered the hfdhe2 aziz potential @xcite and we have employed the pair - suzuki approximation @xcite for the imaginary time propagator with time step @xmath22 k@xmath23 .
one difficulty with ( [ pot ] ) is that the potential is long range so that either one puts the system in a bucket @xcite or one should consider a vortex lattice @xcite .
such complications can be avoided by multiplying @xmath24 in ( [ pot ] ) by a smoothing function @xmath25 ( @xmath26 being the side of the simulation box ) so that standard periodic boundary conditions can be applied . with this choice ,
the extra - potential is equivalent to the of one only for @xmath27 , the provided @xmath28 is no more an exact eigenstate of @xmath15 but it is close to it in the interesting region of the vortex core if @xmath29 is large enough .
here we have used @xmath30 .
we have performed simulations at @xmath31@xmath32 in a nearly squared box designed to house a perfect triangular crystal with @xmath33 lattice sites , and a crystal with 10 vacancies ( @xmath34 ) ; such vacancies in the initial configuration transform themselves in dislocations @xcite . integrated vortex energy @xmath35 with error bars as a function of the distance from the core in perfect 2d solid @xmath0he at @xmath31@xmath32.,width=264 ] in fig .
[ fig : e2d ] we report our results for the integrated vortex energies @xmath36 ( @xmath37 and @xmath38 are , respectively , the energy of the particles that lie inside the disk of radius @xmath39 in the system with and without vortex ) as a function of the distance from the core in the perfect crystal .
the center of mass of the system is not fixed , and we find that , independently on the starting configuration of the crystal , the vortex core sits in an interstitial site . we also find a very small relaxation of the surrounding lattice around the vortex core .
comparison between the radial defect distribution @xmath40 as a function of the distance from the origin ( vortex core when vortex is present ) for a 2d solid @xmath0he at @xmath31@xmath32 with ( filled symbols ) and without ( open symbols ) a vortex in the perfect ( circles ) and in defected ( squares ) crystal.,width=264 ] in order to study the effects of the vortex on the crystal properties we have monitored the static structure factor , the pair distribution function and the radial defect distribution @xmath40 ( i.e. the distribution of the particle whose coordination is different from 6 as a function of the distance from the origin where the vortex core is located ) . in fig . [
fig : x2d ] we plot our results for @xmath40 both for the perfect and for the defected crystal .
we find that in the defected case the radial defect distribution is about an order of magnitude larger than in the perfect one ; however , the results of the system with and without vortex are very close each other so that we conclude that the of vortex does not affect in a sensible way the disorder which behaves as in the system without vortex .
we come at a similar conclusion for the crystalline structure , since both the static structure factor and the pair distribution function show no appreciable differences for the system with and without the vortex .
one body density matrix @xmath41 in 2d solid @xmath0he without ( open symbols ) and with ( filled symbols ) a vortex for the perfect crystal ( circles ) and for the crystal with dislocations ( squares).,width=264 ] we have computed also the one - body density matrix @xmath41 for the perfect and for the defected crystal with and without the vortex in order to investigate the vortex effects on the off - diagonal properties .
our results are reported in fig .
[ fig : c2d ] .
@xmath41 for the crystal with vortex are indistinguishable within the error bars from the ones obtained without vortex .
we conclude that the of vortex is not able to induce a bose - einstein condensation ( bec ) in the perfect crystal , or to increase the already present condensate fraction in the defected one .
since no bec is present in the perfect crystal and the of vortex is not able to induce it by itself , we can conclude that perfect 2d solid @xmath0he can not sustain vortices of the of type .
thus the of wave function is a possible representation of a vortex in solid @xmath0helium only when bec is already present , like in a defected crystal .
preliminary results in three dimensional solid @xmath0he seem to confirm such conclusions for the of vortex . in the liquid phase , the of phase
@xcite has been improved with the inclusion of back - flow ( bf ) correlations @xcite .
the effect of backflow increases @xcite at higher densities and it might well become dominant in the solid phase .
computations along this line are in progress .
since the bf terms acts mainly near the vortex core , we might expect that bf will not modify much the off - diagonal properties in 2d , where the vortex core is a point defect , while it could become relevant in 3d where the vortex core is an extended defect .
this work was supported by regione lombardia and cilea consortium through a lisa initiative ( laboratory for interdisciplinary advanced simulation ) 2010 grant [ link : http://lisa.cilea.it ] .
|
99 balibar s 2010 _ nature _ * 464 * 176 anderson p w 2007 _ nature phys . _
* 3 * 160 anderson p w 2008 _ phys . rev .
lett . _ * 100 * 215301 penzev a , yasuta y and kubota m 2008 _ phys . rev . lett . _ * 101 * 065301 chester g v ,
metz r , and reatto l 1968 _ phys .
_ * 175 * 275 ortiz g and ceperley d m 1995 _ phys .
lett . _ * 75 * 4642 vitiello s a , reatto l , chester g v and kalos m h 1996 _ phys .
_ b * 54 * 1205 sadd m , chester g v , and reatto l 1997 _ phys .
lett . _ * 79 * 2490 takagi t 2003 _ physica _ b * 329 * 216 giorgini s , boronat j and casulleras j 1996 _ phys .
lett . _ * 77 * 2754 feynman r p 1955 _ progress in low temperature physics i _ , ed c j gorter ( amsterdam : north - holland ) boninsegni m , kuklov a b , pollet l , prokofev n v , svistunov b v and troyer m 2006 _ phys .
_ * 97 * 080401 clark b k and ceperley d m 2008 _ comput .
commun . _ * 179 * 82 pollet l , boninsegni m , kuklov a b , prokofev n v , svistunov b v and troyer m 2008 _ phys .
lett . _ * 101 * 097202 vitali e , rossi m , tramonto f , galli d e and reatto l 2008 _ phys . rev .
_ b * 77 * 180505(r ) rossi m , vitali e , galli d e and reatto l 2010 _ j. phys . : condens . matter _ * 22 * 145401 galli d
e and reatto l 2003 _ mol .
phys . _ * 101 * 1697 galli d
e and reatto l 2004 _ j. low temp .
phys . _ * 134 * 121 vitiello s a , kalos m h and reatto l 1989 _ condensed matter theories _ , ed v c aguilera - navarro ( new york : plenum ) rossi m , nava m , galli d e and reatto l 2009 _ j. chem .
phys . _ * 131 * 154108 aziz r a , nain v p s , carley j s , taylor w l and mcconville g t 1979 _ j. chem .
phys . _ * 70 * 4330
|
balibar 2010 nature 464 * 176 anderson p 2007 3 * 160 anderson 2008 100 * 215301 penzev yasuta kubota m 2008 101 * 065301 chester g metz r reatto l 1968 175 * 275 ortiz g ceperley d 1995 75 * 4642 vitiello reatto l chester kalos m 1996 54 * 1205 sadd m chester reatto l 1997 79 * 2490 takagi t 2003 329 * 216 giorgini s boronat j casulleras j 1996 77 * 2754 feynman r 1955 low temperature physics gorter amsterdam holland boninsegni kuklov pollet l prokofev svistunov troyer m 2006 97 * 080401 clark b k ceperley d m 2008 179 * 82 pollet l boninsegni kuklov prokofev svistunov troyer 2008 101 * 097202 vitali e rossi m tramonto f galli d e reatto l 2008 77 * 180505 rossi reatto l 2010 condens 22 * 145401 galli d e reatto l 2003 phys101 1697 galli reatto 2004 low temp phys . 134 * 121 vitiello kalos m reatto 1989 condensed matter theories aguilera navarro new york plenum rossi nava m galli d reatto 2009 chem . 131 * 154108 aziz r nain v carley j taylor g 1979 chem. 70 4330
| 0.129322
| 662
| 383
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,517
|
we argue that effective 1d models of stripes in the cuprate superconductors can be constructed by studying ground states and elementary excitations of domain walls in 2d model antiferromagnets .
this method , applied to the @xmath0@xmath1 model with ising anisotropy , yields two such limiting cases : an ordinary 1d electron gas and a 1d gas of holons strongly coupled to transversal fluctuations of the stripe .
formation of charge stripes in some of the cuprate superconductors @xcite is a peculiar phenomenon in its own right .
a possible connection between the stripes and high - temperature superconductivity makes them even more attractive to a theorist .
the puzzle is nevertheless quite hard : to date there is no microscopic theory describing the physics of stripes in the cuprates .
some progress has been made .
hartree - fock studies of the hubbard model near half - filling @xcite have revealed that doped charges segregate in the form of narrow stripes .
the stripes are domain walls separating antiferromagnetic ( af ) domains with opposite orientations of the neel vector , in agreement with experiments .
however , the predicted linear density of charge on a stripe , @xmath2 hole per unit cell , indicates that there are no charges able to carry current .
experimentally , @xmath3 for non - overlapping stripes @xcite . in the absence of a microscopic theory , it is reasonable to look for a model description in which a stripe is a 1d object interacting with the surrounding antiferromagnet .
a stripe is characterized by a ground state , by its elementary excitations , and by the interactions of the excitations among themselves and with the environment .
|
a stripe is a complicated object .
its degrees of freedom may include charge and spin of the stripe particles , as well as transverse fluctuations of its position .
one potentially promising route to finding the right 1d model is to study simple solvable models of an antiferromagnet in 2d in the presence of a domain wall .
a single domain wall can be created artificially , e.g. , by wrapping a system with an odd number of rows on a cylinder .
one may then study an isolated stripe at any filling @xmath4 by adding or removing the right number of electrons .
a 2d model may look unrealistic , but with universality and a bit of luck the resulting 1d theory may have just the right symmetry of the vacuum and the correct quantum numbers of elementary excitations .
consider a 2d model , a variant of the @xmath0@xmath1 model in the ising limit @xmath5 @xcite : @xmath6,\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the usual exclusion of doubly occupied sites .
the dominating @xmath7 term minimizes the number of frustrated ( ferromagnetic ) bonds and thus sets the ground state .
the energy of an af bond @xmath8 controls interactions of charged quasiparticles on the domain wall and in the bulk . making @xmath9 prevents phase separation in the bulk , as well as on a stripe . for @xmath13 , the stripe will contain @xmath14 quasiparticles with the quantum numbers of electrons , @xmath15 , @xmath16 ( fig .
[ fig : electron ] ) .
because of the zigzag geometry of the stripe , the electron quasiparticles feel a strong ( of order @xmath7 ) staggered magnetic field .
it confines electrons with opposite spins to different rows of the stripe . within its row ,
an electron can delocalize to reduce kinetic energy . in the tight - binding model ( [ t - j - ham ] ) , such hopping is a multistage process , which involves pushing a neighbor spin out of the way . precisely at half - filling ( @xmath17 ) ,
the domain wall is bond - centered .
a single doped hole ends up at the domain wall ( fig .
[ fig : holon ] , left ) .
if it starts to move alng the wall , two remarkable things happen .
first , the hole leaves its spin @xmath18 behind in the form of a spinon and then propagates freely as a spinless object ( a holon , fig .
[ fig : holon ] , right ) .
no additional frustrated bonds are produced afterwards .
furthermore , no costly spinons would be left behind had we started with 2 holes .
second , the holon ( as well as the spinon ) resides on a transverse kink of the domain wall .
these elementary excitations are thus maximally strongly coupled to transverse fluctuations of the stripe .
kink direction can be specified by assigning a holon ( or a spinon ) a transverse flavor @xmath19 @xcite .
|
stripe complicated object freedom include charge spin particles transverse fluctuations position promising route right 1d model study simple models antiferromagnet in 2d domain wall single domain wall created artificially wrapping system odd rows cylinder study isolated stripe filling @xmath4 adding removing right electrons 2d model unrealistic with universality luck 1d theory may have right symmetry vacuum correct quantum numbers elementary excitations consider 2d model variant @xmath0@xmath1 model ising limit @xmath5 @xmath6 exclusion doubly occupied sites dominating @xmath7 term minimizes frustrated ferromagnetic bonds sets ground state energy af bond @xmath8 controls interactions charged quasiparticles domain wall bulk @xmath9 prevents phase separation bulk stripe stripe @xmath14 quasiparticles with quantum numbers electrons @xmath15 @xmath16 zigzag geometry stripe electron quasiparticles feel strong staggered magnetic field confines electrons with opposite spins to different rows stripe electron can delocalize reduce kinetic energytight - binding model ( t - j - ham ] ) hopping multistage process pushing neighbor spin at half - filling @xmath17 ) domain wall bond - centered single doped hole ends at domain wall fig holon ] left starts wall two things happen hole leaves spin behind spinon propagates as spinless object holon right no additional bonds no costly spinons left started with 2 holes holon spinon resides on transverse kink of domain wall elementary excitations coupled to transverse fluctuations stripe kink direction specified by assigning holon or spinon transverse flavor @xmath19 @xcite .
| 0.130952
| 655
| 327
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,523
|
in this work we investigate the cooling channels of diffuse gas ( i.e. @xmath0 @xmath1 ) in cosmology .
we aim to identify the wavelengths where most of the energy is radiated in the form of emission lines or continuum radiation , and the main elements and ions responsible for the emission .
we use a subset of cosmological , hydrodynamical runs from the owls project to calculate the emission of diffuse gas and its evolution with time .
we find that at @xmath2 ( @xmath3 ) about 70 ( 80 ) per cent of the energy emitted by diffuse gas is carried by emission lines , with the continuum radiation contributing the remainder .
hydrogen lines in the lyman series are the primary contributors to the line emission , with a share of 16 ( 20 ) per cent .
oxygen lines are the main metal contributors at high redshift , while silicon , carbon and iron lines are strongest at low redshift , when the contributions of agb stars and supernova ia explosions to the metal budget become important and when there is more hot gas .
the ionic species carrying the most energy are o , c , c , si , si , fe and s. the great majority of energy is emitted in the uv band ( @xmath4 ) , both as continuum radiation and line emission . with almost no exception ,
all the strongest lines fall in this band . at high energies ,
continuum radiation is dominant ( e.g. , 80 per cent in the x - ray band ) , while lines contribute progressively more at lower energies .
while the results do depend on the details of the numerical implementation of the physical processes modeled in the simulations , the comparison of results from different simulations demonstrates that the variations are overall small , and that the conclusions are fairly robust .
given the overwhelming importance of uv emission for the cooling of diffuse gas , it is desirable to build instruments dedicated to the detection and characterisation of diffuse uv emission .
= -0.8 in [ firstpage ] intergalactic medium diffuse radiation radiation mechanisms : thermal method : numerical
|
the evolution of the universe is determined by the complex interplay of a large number of processes that involve the exchange of mass and energy . a global view of these
mass and energy flows has been taken to investigate the universal content of baryonic mass @xcite , energy @xcite , metals @xcite and star formation @xcite .
these quantities give us useful insights in to the evolution of the physical universe as a whole and they help us understand how individual processes contribute to the evolution . in this work , we aim to investigate a key part of this global energy interchange : radiative cooling of diffuse gas on cosmological scales . in particular , we aim to identify the cooling channels that dominate the energy budget of the diffuse gas that traces the large - scale structure of the universe and that feeds galaxies and fuels star formation through accretion processes . for our purposes
, we define this diffuse matter as the sum of three main components : i ) the intergalactic medium ( igm ) , defined as the low - density gas that is not gravitationally bound to galaxies and their haloes ; ii ) the circum - galactic medium ( cgm ) , which is denser than the igm , resides in the immediate surroundings of galaxies , and is bound to galaxy haloes ; and iii ) the intra - cluster medium ( icm ) , which is the hot , shock - heated gas that accumulates in the gravitational potentials of groups and clusters .
both the cgm and the icm are gravitationally bound to haloes and represent the densest fraction of diffuse gas . while the distinctions between these components are often not clear in observations , they can be more cleanly defined in simulations . in the rest of the paper
, we will consider gas in simulations as diffuse " if its hydrogen number density is @xmath5 @xmath1 .
thermal and kinetic energy are injected in to the diffuse gas by gravity , by galactic winds powered by stellar winds and supernova explosions , and by feedback due to black hole accretion ( agn feedback ) , cosmic rays and other processes .
the gas cools via a variety of mechanisms and emits radiation in a broad range of wavelengths .
the cooling radiation can in turn heat up gas locally or far away , can be absorbed and re - emitted at lower frequencies by dust , or ( if the mean free path of photons is very large ) can contribute to the background radiation field .
cooling processes within galaxies are thought to contribute substantially to the diffuse infrared , optical , uv and x - ray backgrounds and are an essential ingredient in galaxy formation .
these are still not well understood , but can be somewhat constrained and quantified by observation .
the radiation produced by the cooling of diffuse gas , on the other hand , is very difficult to observe directly because of its very low surface brightness ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
? * ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
currently , the igm can therefore be more effectively studied in absorption rather than in emission . in this work , we aim to provide a global view of how cooling occurs in diffuse gas . to this end
, we use a subset of runs from the overwhelmingly large simulations ( owls hereafter ) project @xcite to address a number of questions concerning the emission and cooling processes of diffuse gas , including : i ) which transitions , ions , and gas phases are responsible for most of the cooling radiation , and should thus be the focus of theoretical modelling efforts ?
ii ) which wavebands and emission lines carry most of the energy emitted by diffuse gas through cooling and fluorescence radiation , and should thus be primary targets for observational studies ?
iii ) what is the relative importance of continuum emission and line emission ?
iv ) what is the global emission of diffuse gas , and how does it change with time ?
how much energy is stored in the igm ?
since our focus is diffuse gas , we will ignore emission by dust and by gas with densities exceeding @xmath6 @xmath1 .
the paper is organized as follows .
section [ tables ] describes the emissivity tables used to calculate the gas emission and shows the dependence of the emissivity on temperature for a large sample of ions , individual emission lines and the continuum .
section [ owlproj ] discusses the simulations and the methodology used to calculate the gas emission .
section [ volume ] presents results for the fraction of energy emitted by different ions , elements and the continuum in the reference simulation set ( _ ref _ in the following ) at @xmath2 and @xmath3 . in section [ sims ]
we compare results from different simulations to understand the effect of varying the physical prescriptions .
finally , we draw our conclusions in section [ conclusion ] and present a series of numerical convergence tests in the appendix .
.adopted solar abundances , from @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . [ cols="<,^,<,^",options="header " , ] in this appendix we provide the full lists of the individual emission lines that contribute most of the cooling energy .
the fractions of the mean energy emitted per unit volume for individual lines as a function of temperature are shown in figs .
[ lines_vs_temp_z=0 ] and [ lines_vs_temp_z=2 ] .
only lines that contribute at least 1 per cent of the total emitted energy in at least one temperature bin are listed .
table [ linelist1 ] lists line for h , he , c , n , o , ne and mg . table [ linelist2 ] lists lines for si , s , ca and fe .
|
evolution universe determined by complex interplay processes exchange mass energy global view flows universal content of baryonic mass energy metals star formation quantities give insights in evolution universe understand individual processes contribute work aim to investigate energy interchange : radiative cooling of diffuse gas on cosmological scales identify cooling channels energy budget diffuse gas structure feeds galaxies fuels star formation define diffuse matter as sum of three components : intergalactic medium ( igm ) low - density gas not gravitationally bound to galaxies haloes circum - galactic medium cgm denser than igm in surroundings galaxies bound to galaxy haloes intra - cluster medium icm hot shock - heated gas accumulates in gravitational potentials of groups clusters cgm icm gravitationally bound to haloes represent densest fraction of diffuse gas distinctions between components not clear in observations more cleanly defined in simulations consider gas in simulations as diffuse if hydrogen number density is @xmath5 @xmath1 .thermal kinetic energy injected to diffuse gas by gravity galactic winds stellar winds supernova explosions feedback due to black hole accretion ( agn feedback ) cosmic rays other processes gas cools via mechanisms emits radiation in broad range of wavelengths cooling radiation can heat up gas locally or be absorbed re - emitted at lower frequencies by dust or if large contribute to background radiation field cooling processes within galaxies contribute to diffuse infrared optical uv x - ray backgrounds essential ingredient in galaxy formation not well understood can be constrained quantified by observation radiation produced by cooling of diffuse gas difficult to observe directly of low surface brightness ( igm can be more effectively studied in absorption than emission in work aim to provide global view of how cooling in diffuse gas use runs from large project @xcite address questions emission cooling processes diffuse gas including which transitions ions gas phases responsible for cooling radiation focus of theoretical modelling ? which wavebands emission lines carry energy diffuse gas cooling primary targets for observational studies ? importance of continuum emission line emission ? global emission of diffuse gas change with time ? energy stored in igm ? focus is diffuse gas ignore emission by dust gas with densities exceeding @xmath6 @xmath1 paper organized section [ tables describes emissivity tables shows dependence on temperature for ions emission lines continuum owlproj discusses simulations methodology gas emission [ volume ] presents results for fraction energy emitted by different ions elements continuum in reference simulation set at @xmath2 @xmath3 section [ sims ] compare results from simulations effect of varying physical prescriptions draw conclusions in section conclusion present numerical convergence tests in appendix solar abundances from @xcite appendix full lists of individual emission lines contribute cooling energyfractions mean energy emitted unit volume lines temperature shown figs lines_vs_temp_z=0_z=2 ] lines contribute 1 per cent total emitted energy one temperature bin listed table linelist1 lists h he c n o ne mg linelist2 lists lines si s ca fe
| 0.260204
| 1,213
| 565
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,524
|
new data with a minimum bias trigger for 158 gev / nucleon pb + pb have been analyzed . directed and
elliptic flow as a function of rapidity of the particles and centrality of the collision are presented .
the centrality dependence of the ratio of elliptic flow to the initial space elliptic anisotropy is compared to models .
j. bchler@xmath0 , d. barna@xmath1 , l.s .
barnby@xmath2 , j. bartke@xmath3 , r.a .
barton@xmath2 , l. betev@xmath4 , h. biakowska@xmath5 , a. billmeier@xmath6 , c. blume@xmath7 , c.o .
blyth@xmath2 , b. boimska@xmath5 , j. bracinik@xmath8 , f.p .
brady@xmath9 , r. brockmann@xmath10 , r. brun@xmath0 , p. buni@xmath11 , l. carr@xmath12 , d. cebra@xmath9 , g.e .
cooper@xmath13 , j.g .
cramer@xmath12 , p. csat@xmath1 , v. eckardt@xmath14 , f. eckhardt@xmath15 , d. ferenc@xmath9 , h.g .
fischer@xmath0 , z. fodor@xmath1 , p. foka@xmath6 , p. freund@xmath14 , v. friese@xmath15 , j. ftacnik@xmath8 , j. gl@xmath1 , r. ganz@xmath14 , m. gadzicki@xmath6 , e. gadysz@xmath3 , j. grebieszkow@xmath16 , j.w .
harris@xmath17 , s. hegyi@xmath1 , v. hlinka@xmath8 , c. hhne@xmath15 , g. igo@xmath4 , m. ivanov@xmath8 , p. jacobs@xmath13 , r. janik@xmath8 , p.g .
jones@xmath2 , k. kadija@xmath18 , v.i .
kolesnikov@xmath19 , m. kowalski@xmath3 , b. lasiuk@xmath17 , p. lvai@xmath1 , a.i .
malakhov@xmath19 , s. margetis@xmath20 , c. markert@xmath7 , b.w .
mayes@xmath21 , g.l .
melkumov@xmath19 , j. molnr@xmath1 , j.m .
nelson@xmath2 , g. odyniec@xmath13 , m.d .
oldenburg@xmath6 , g. plla@xmath1 , a.d .
panagiotou@xmath22 , a. petridis@xmath22 , m. pikna@xmath8 , l. pinsky@xmath21 , a.m. poskanzer@xmath13 , d.j .
prindle@xmath12 , f. phlhofer@xmath15 , j.g .
reid@xmath12 , r. renfordt@xmath6 , w. retyk@xmath16 , h.g .
ritter@xmath13 , d. rhrich@xmath23 , c. roland@xmath7 , g. roland@xmath6 , a. rybicki@xmath3 , t. sammer@xmath14 , a. sandoval@xmath7 , h. sann@xmath7 , a.yu .
semenov@xmath19 , e. schfer@xmath14 , n. schmitz@xmath14 , p. seyboth@xmath14 , f. siklr@xmath24 , b. sitar@xmath8 , e. skrzypczak@xmath16 , r. snellings@xmath13 , g.t.a .
squier@xmath2 , r. stock@xmath6 , p. strmen@xmath8 , h. strbele@xmath6 , t. susa@xmath25 , i. szarka@xmath8 , i. szentptery@xmath1 , j. sziklai@xmath1 , m. toy@xmath26 , t.a .
trainor@xmath12 , s. trentalange@xmath4 , t. ullrich@xmath17 , d. varga@xmath1 , m. vassiliou@xmath22 , g.i .
veres@xmath1 , g. vesztergombi@xmath1 , s. voloshin@xmath13 , d. vrani@xmath27 , f. wang@xmath13 , d.d .
weerasundara@xmath12 , s. wenig@xmath0 , c. whitten@xmath4 , n. xu@xmath13 , t.a .
yates@xmath2 , i.k .
yoo@xmath15 , j. zimnyi@xmath1 @xmath22department of physics , university of athens , athens , greece .
+ @xmath13lawrence berkeley national laboratory , university of california , berkeley , usa .
+ @xmath2birmingham university , birmingham , england .
+ @xmath8institute of physics , bratislava , slovakia .
+ @xmath1kfki research institute for particle and nuclear physics , budapest , hungary .
+ @xmath0cern , geneva , switzerland .
+ @xmath3institute of nuclear physics , cracow , poland .
+ @xmath7gesellschaft fr schwerionenforschung ( gsi ) , darmstadt , germany .
+ @xmath9university of california at davis , davis , usa . + @xmath19joint institute for nuclear research , dubna , russia .
+ @xmath6fachbereich physik der universitt , frankfurt , germany .
+ @xmath21university of houston , houston , tx , usa . + @xmath20kent state university , kent , oh , usa . + @xmath4university of california at los angeles , los angeles , usa .
+ @xmath15fachbereich physik der universitt , marburg , germany .
+ @xmath14max - planck - institut fr physik , munich , germany .
+ @xmath5institute for nuclear studies , warsaw , poland .
+ @xmath16institute for experimental physics , university of warsaw , warsaw , poland .
+ @xmath12nuclear physics laboratory , university of washington , seattle , wa , usa .
+ @xmath17yale university , new haven , ct , usa .
+ @xmath25rudjer boskovic institute , zagreb , croatia .
+ @xmath28present address : university of bergen , norway .
+ @xmath29deceased . +
|
in the fourier decomposition of the azimuthal distribution of particles , the first and second coefficients correspond to the directed , @xmath30 , and elliptic , @xmath31 , flow , respectively @xcite .
the elliptic flow is expected to be sensitive to the system evolution at the time of maximum compression @xcite .
ollitrault @xcite showed that in a hydro model the elliptic flow is proportional to the initial space elliptic anisotropy of the overlapping region weighted by the number of nucleon collisions in the beam direction .
this initial space elliptic anisotropy , which we will call @xmath32 , has been calculated for a woods - saxon density distribution and shown to be almost insensitive to the nucleon - nucleon cross section @xcite .
it is enlightening to plot @xmath33 versus centrality @xcite in order to look for changes in the reaction mechanism or properties of the nuclear matter .
thus the motivation for this work is to find a signature ( elliptic flow ) , scan this signature as a function of a control parameter ( centrality ) , and , after first dividing out the geometry of the initial state , look for a change in the physics ( unexpected behavior ) .
na49 has published directed and elliptic flow results from the na49 main time projection chambers for a set of data taken with a medium impact parameter trigger @xcite .
we now have a new set of data taken with a minimum bias trigger so that we can study the flow centrality dependence . also , the tracks from the main and vertex tpcs are combined resulting in full coverage of the forward hemisphere .
the data in the graphs below presenting flow as a function of rapidity have been reflected about mid - rapidity .
the data have been integrated over @xmath34 and in some cases also over @xmath35 using as weights the measured double differential cross sections @xcite .
the data have been sorted into six centrality bins using the zero degree calorimeter , with `` cen1 '' being the most central and `` cen6 '' the most peripheral .
the impact parameter values for these bins have been estimated from the number of participants which were obtained by integrating the yields @xcite .
slightly higher values of @xmath36 , used in the oral presentation of this paper , were determined from the fraction of the total cross section corresponding to each bin .
only some of the available data has been analyzed so far .
thus these data are preliminary and no systematic errors have been included yet .
the rapidity dependence of directed and elliptic flow integrated over the whole range of measured impact parameters up to about 11 fm is shown in fig . [
fig : v - y ] .
the pion @xmath30 values hug the axis near mid - rapidity and the @xmath31 values for both pions and protons appear to slightly peak somewhat away from mid - rapidity . for pions
the @xmath30 and @xmath31 values are shown for different centrality bins in fig .
[ fig : cen ] .
both sets of flow values increase continuously as the reaction becomes more peripheral .
the elliptic flow values for pions have been integrated over rapidity up to @xmath37 and are shown in fig .
[ fig : b ] , together with simulations from rqmd v2.3 @xcite .
the flow from rqmd peaks at a medium impact parameter whereas the flow from experiment continues to rise . in fig .
[ fig : b - ep ] the @xmath31 values have been divided by the initial space elliptic anisotropy @xcite .
in addition , results from rqmd v3.0 @xcite which includes a phase transition are shown .
typical hydro results @xcite are also shown .
the data are below hydro indicating a lack of complete equilibration in the reaction @xcite .
the data are above the rqmd resonance gas and tantalizingly close to the rqmd phase transition calculation . clearly , it is important to process the full set of na49 data and obtain final results .
9 a.m. poskanzer and s.a .
voloshin , phys .
c * 58 * , 1671 ( 1998 ) .
h. sorge , phys .
letters * 78 * , 2309 ( 1997 ) .
ollitrault , phys .
d * 46 * , 229 ( 1992 ) .
p. jacobs and g. cooper , star note sn0402 ( 1999 ) .
h. sorge , phys .
* 82 * , 2048 ( 1999 ) ; h. sorge , this conference ( 1999 ) .
h. heiselberg and a .- m .
levy , phys .
c * 59 * , 2716 ( 1999 ) .
h. appelshuser _ et al .
_ , na49 , phys .
letters * 80 * , 4136 ( 1998 ) .
a.m. poskanzer _ et al .
_ , na49 , nucl . phys . *
a638 * , 463c ( 1998 ) .
g. cooper , na49 , this conference .
f. sikler , na49 , this conference .
h. sorge , phys .
c * 52 * , 3291 ( 1995 ) .
p. kolb , j. sollfrank , u. heinz , preprint nucl - th/9906003 .
voloshin and a.m. poskanzer , preprint nucl - th/9906075 .
|
fourier decomposition azimuthal distribution particles first second coefficients correspond directed @xmath30 elliptic @xmath31 flow elliptic flow sensitive system evolution maximum compression @xcite ollitrault showed hydro model elliptic flow proportional to initial space elliptic anisotropy overlapping region weighted nucleon collisions beam direction initial space elliptic anisotropy @xmath32 calculated woods - saxon density distribution almost insensitive to nucleon - nucleon cross section @xcite plot @xmath33 versus centrality @xcite changes reaction mechanism properties nuclear matter motivation find signature elliptic flow scan signature function control parameter centrality look for change physics unexpected behavior na49 published directed elliptic flow results main time projection chambers data medium impact parameter trigger @xcite new set data minimum bias trigger study flow centrality dependence tracks main vertex tpcs combined full coverage forward hemisphere data graphs flow function rapidity reflected mid - rapidity data integrated over @xmath34 @xmath35 using measured double differential cross sections @xcitedata sorted into six centrality bins zero degree calorimeter cen1 '' central cen6 '' peripheral impact parameter values estimated from participants integrating yields @xcite higher values of @xmath36 determined from total cross section each bin some data analyzed preliminary no systematic errors rapidity dependence of directed elliptic flow over impact parameters up to 11 fm shown in fig . pion @xmath30 values hug axis near mid - rapidity @xmath31 values peak from mid - rapidity @xmath30 @xmath31 values for different centrality bins in fig flow values increase as reaction peripheral elliptic flow values for pions integrated over rapidity up to @xmath37 shown in fig . simulations from rqmd v2.3 @xcite flow from rqmd peaks at medium impact parameter flow from experiment @xmath31 values divided by initial space elliptic anisotropy @xcite results from rqmd v3.0 @xcite phase transition shown typical hydro results @xcite data below hydro lack of equilibration data above rqmd resonance gas close to rqmd phase transition calculationprocess na49 data obtain final results 9 a.m. poskanzer voloshin phys . 58 1671 ( 1998 ) sorge phys letters 78 2309 ( 1997 ) ollitrault phys d 46 229 ( 1992 ) p jacobs g cooper note sn0402 1999 ) sorge . 82 2048 ( 1999 ) conference heiselberg levy phys . c 59 2716 ( 1999 ) appelshuser na49 phys letters 80 4136 ( 1998 ) poskanzer na49 phys a638 463c ( 1998 ) g. cooper na49 conference sikler na49 sorge . c 52 3291 ( 1995 ) p. kolb sollfrank heinz preprint nucl/9906003 voloshin poskanzer preprint/9906075
| 0.183721
| 1,224
| 615
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,537
|
based on the strong coupling expansion , we reinvestigate two dimensional @xmath0 sigma model by the use of pad - borel approximants .
the conventional strong coupling expansion of the mass square @xmath1 in momentum space in @xmath2 is inverted to give @xmath3 expanded in @xmath4 .
borel transform of @xmath3 with respect to @xmath1 is carried out and the result is improved as the rational function by pad method .
we find the behavior of pad - borel transformed bare coupling at @xmath5th order is consistent for @xmath6 with that of continuum scaling to the four - loop perturbation theory .
we estimate non - perturbative mass gap at @xmath6 and find the agreement with the exact result by hasenfratz et.al .
|
nearly four decades ago , the quark confinement was shown by wilson at the strong bare coupling region @xcite . for weak coupling ,
perturbation theory clarified for the yang - mills system that bare coupling @xmath7 tends to vanish as the lattice spacing @xmath8 @xcite .
the motivation of the present work is to attempt to extrapolate the large @xmath9 behavior of bare coupling to the asymptotically free behavior at weak coupling . for the purpose , we like to reformulate the strong coupling expansion by changing the primary variable from bare coupling to the lattice spacing itself .
lattice serves us a suitable regularization , since in lattice field theories the lattice spacing @xmath9 explicitly appears in the action and enters into the physical quantities .
for instance , the dimensionless correlation length @xmath10 represents a physical length scale divided by @xmath9 .
it is given at strong coupling as a series @xmath11 in @xmath12 and it determines , in an implicit manner , the @xmath9 dependence of the bare coupling .
mutual roles of @xmath7 and @xmath10 are exchanged by inverting the relation @xmath11 .
thus we address the question whether the small @xmath10 series of @xmath7 allows us to confirm directly the weak coupling behavior predicted by perturbation theory . in the present paper , in non - linear @xmath0 model at two dimensions , we make an attempt to approximate the asymptotic behavior of bare coupling in the continuum limit via its large @xmath9 expansion .
the model is of interest as a testing ground of our approach , since it enjoyes asymptotic freedom and dynamical mass generation for @xmath6 @xcite .
in addition to the large @xmath13 limit , we also consider the case of finite @xmath13 . as the basic variable , rather than the correlation length in lattice space ,
we adopt mass @xmath1 in momentum space defined by the zero momentum limit of the two - point field correlation .
the lattice spacing @xmath9 is included in the mass which is rescaled to be dimensionless and then @xmath1 must vanish in the continuum limit @xmath8 ( see ( [ mass ] ) ) .
now the strong coupling expansion gives series of @xmath1 in @xmath14 . by inverting the series
, we express @xmath3 as a power series in @xmath4 , which is equivalent to large @xmath9 expansion .
as it would be , naive series fails to confirm the continuum behavior of @xmath3 .
however , it is nontrivial and interesting to examine , when both pad and borel techniques are applied on the series , whether the continuum scaling emerges at finite @xmath13 or not . before proceeding to following sections ,
we remark the role of borel transform in our approach .
we use borel transform as a device of dilation operation around the continuum limit .
the response of scale transformation on @xmath15 is probed by rescaling @xmath1 to @xmath16 in @xmath17 and taking the @xmath18 limit .
then , it is said @xmath17 scales with the exponent @xmath19 if @xmath20 the above criterion of scaling is implemented by introducing @xmath21 defined by @xmath22 and performing expansion to some finite orders in @xmath21 @xcite .
suppose the function approaches to @xmath23 .
then , expanding it to @xmath24 and setting @xmath25 , one has @xmath26 .
further , if we take the limit @xmath27 with @xmath28 fixed , we obtain @xmath29 that is , the limit @xmath18 has transitioned to the limit @xmath30 with the cut off @xmath31 .
then the scaling behavior with exponent @xmath19 manifests itself in the power of @xmath32 .
note the universal quantity @xmath19 is left unchanged . on the other hand , when same operation is acted on @xmath17 in the series form @xmath33 valid at large @xmath1 , we have @xmath34 with a larger convergence radius , which is just the borel transform of the original series .
we thus interpret the borel transform as a realization of scale transformation .
we do not need integrating @xmath35 back to @xmath17 .
though the information of @xmath15 over the whole range of @xmath1 is not obtained , what we need in lattice field theories is the behavior of @xmath15 in the neighborhood of @xmath36 .
on the two - dimensional square lattice , the continuous spin fields @xmath37 are set on every sites .
the action of the system is given by @xmath38 where @xmath39 and @xmath40 the fields are constrained to satisfy at every sites , @xmath41 .
the mass variable @xmath1 defined via the zero momentum limit of the propagator @xmath42 is given by @xmath43 where susceptibility @xmath44 and second moment @xmath45 are , respectively , given by @xmath46 and @xmath47 .
@xmath48 denotes the dimension of lattice space and @xmath49 in the present work .
let us summarize the continuum limit of the model and large @xmath9 expansion of @xmath3 .
the perturbative renormalization group predicts that , for @xmath6 , the correlation length behaves at weak coupling as @xmath50\big(\frac{2\pi n\beta}{n-2}\big)^{-1/(n-2)}\big(1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{a_{k}}{\beta^k}\big ) , \label{rg}\ ] ] where the multiplied constant @xmath51 is specified only non - perturbatively .
hasenfratz et .
al . has computed it via thermodynamic bethe ansatz @xcite , giving @xmath52 the terms @xmath53 @xmath54 in ( [ rg ] ) are contributions of @xmath55-loop levels and three- @xcite and four - loop @xcite results were computed in the literature .
they are given as @xmath56 though three and higher loop contributions disappear in the continuum limit for the bare coupling , we can not take out the limit because only the series to finite order is at hand .
hence , we include known three- and four - loop contributions in our analysis .
it is known that @xmath57 has functional form of @xmath3 , the same as ( [ rg ] ) but with another multiplicative constant , say @xmath58 .
however , monte carlo data @xcite showed that the difference is less than a percent at @xmath59 . since the two constants agree with each other in the large @xmath13 limit , the difference between @xmath51 and @xmath58 may actually be negligible for all @xmath6 .
thus the estimation of the mass gap via strong coupling expansion becomes the estimation of @xmath51 and this is one of the aims of our work . .
since the mass @xmath1 approaches to @xmath60 in the continuum limit , the physical mass of dimension @xmath61 is given by @xmath62 where @xmath63 is the finite mass scale given by @xmath64\big(\frac{2\pi n\beta}{n-2}\big)^{-1/(n-2)}\big(1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{a_{k}}{\beta^k}\big).\ ] ] from ( [ rg ] ) and @xmath65 , we have continuum @xmath3 to four - loop order as a function of @xmath1 , @xmath66 , \label{twoloop2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath67 on the series expansion at large @xmath1 , we borrow the result in the work of butera and comi @xcite who computed strong coupling series of @xmath44 and @xmath45 to @xmath68 . using the result
, we have expansion of @xmath1 in powers of @xmath3 , @xmath69 by inverting the above relation , we have @xmath70 based upon the series ( [ strong1 ] ) , we discuss the approximation of the continuum limit by the use of pad - borel approximation scheme .
we attempt to recover the asymptotically free behavior ( [ twoloop2 ] ) from ( [ strong1 ] ) and then estimate @xmath51 .
large @xmath13 limit serves us a good bench mark of our approach .
so we consider that case first and then turn to finite @xmath13 in the next section . in the large @xmath13 limit , only the one - loop contribution to @xmath3 survives to give @xmath71
as briefly presented in the introduction , borel transform is given by a certain limit of delta expansion @xcite .
explicitly , the logarithm is expanded and gives at @xmath25 that @xmath72 to the order @xmath31 . then using the asymptotic expansion @xmath73 ( @xmath74 denotes euler s constant )
, we have @xmath75 in the @xmath76 limit .
let @xmath77 be small enough with @xmath78 kept finite , then the result represents borel transform of @xmath79 . denoting the operation of borel transform by @xmath80
we thus find @xmath81=\log \bar x+\gamma_{e}$ ] .
using abbreviated simbol @xmath82 $ ] , we then obtain @xmath83 the large @xmath1 expansion of @xmath3 reads @xmath84 borel transform of the above series results to divide the @xmath85th order coefficient by the factorial of @xmath85 , @xmath86 then as a crucial step , we use pad method to extrapolate the above series to larger @xmath87 .
the resultant pad - borel approximants enable us to capture the scaling behavior to be seen in the scaling region as we can see below . as a preliminary study
, we have examined the behaviors of @xmath88 $ ] approximants of @xmath89 over almost possible pairs of @xmath90 at orders @xmath91 . on the contrary to the condensed matter models undergoing second order phase transition , critical behavior of the present model
is known from perturbation theory as logarithmic and slowly varying .
hence it is conceivable that good behaviors come from the cases where the difference between @xmath92 and @xmath85 is small .
the numerical experiment confirmed it is indeed the case .
we have also compared the approximants of three types , pad - borel , borel only and pad only improvements .
the result at @xmath93th order is shown in fig . 1 .
and @xmath94 at 6th order . two broken lines ( one for @xmath3 and the other for @xmath89 ) represent behaviors at continuum .
horizontal axis corresponds to @xmath95 and @xmath96 ( for pad only case).,title="fig : " ] [ comparison ] as already reported in @xcite , borel only improvement is not sufficient for observing the asymptotic freedom .
pad only case ( @xmath97}$ ] in fig .
1 ) is also insufficient as is clear from fig .
however , pad - borel approximant shows enough improvement for quantitative approximation . though pade only approximation is found to be improved at higher orders , the best performance is achieved by pad - borel approximant at every order we analyzed .
we therefore focus on pad - borel approximant hereafter .
now , let us turn to the evaluation of the mass gap by estimating @xmath51 .
since we know information at weak coupling , the estimation is carried out by fitting @xmath98 to @xmath88 $ ] order approximants of @xmath94 , @xmath99}$ ] , by adjusting the value of @xmath51 . in practice , we consider the difference between @xmath99}$ ] and @xmath98 and plot the difference by changing the value of @xmath51 . at just proper value of @xmath51
, the two functions touch with each other at a point @xmath100 and the difference is tiny over an interval including @xmath100 .
a typical case is shown in fig . 2 and
the result of estimation of @xmath51 is shown in table [ tab : estimation1 ] .
for the reason previously written , we list only the results around the diagonal pad .
the result in momentum space is simple modification of the propagator to the continuum limit @xmath105^{-1}$ ] .
since in the large @xmath13 limit , @xmath3 is given by the gap equation written only with the propagator with mass square @xmath1 , we can easily obtain the large @xmath1 series both at first- and infinite - order improved actions ( for detailed presentation , see the first reference in @xcite ) .
for example , at the first order it follows @xmath106 at infinite - order improvement , the right - hand side becomes just the integral of @xmath107 and expansion of @xmath3 in @xmath4 is straightforward .
it now suffices for us to repeat the same procedure for the approximation of ( [ scaling2 ] ) and the constant @xmath51 at the first and inifinite orders of improved actions . here
note that the change of action induces the change of the value of non - universal @xmath51 .
@xmath108 and @xmath109 at first and infinite orders , respectively .
table [ tab : estimation4 ] summarizes the result of our approximation .
the improved action improves the approximation accuracy both at the first and at infinite orders . though the improved lattice action is conventionally used in the monte carlo analysis and perturbation theory , it is also useful in our approach . in the present work ,
we have analyzed pad - borel approximants of strong coupling expansion in non - linear @xmath110 model and have found good behaviors approximating the continuum limit .
we close the paper by pointing out that , even working with the standard action , further higher order computation would improve the result for all @xmath13 including the limit @xmath111 .
pad - borel approximants may become effective at larger @xmath87 ( smaller @xmath112 ) and the two unwanted effects , lattice artifacts and omitted loop contributions , would be weaker there .
then , continuum scaling at smaller @xmath112 with a clearer sign of asymptotic freedom near @xmath113 would be seen , which allows us accurate evaluation of the mass gap for all @xmath6 .
a. m. polyakov , phys . lett .
* 59b * , 79 ( 1975 ) ; + e. brzin , j. zinn - justin , phys . rev
. lett . * 36 * , 691 ( 1976 ) ; + e. brzin , j. zinn - justin and j. c. le guillou , phys . rev .
* d14 * , 2615 ( 1976 ) ; + w.a .
bardeen , b. w. lee and r.e .
shrock , phys . rev . *
d14 * , 985 ( 1976 ) .
|
four decades ago quark confinement shown by wilson at strong bare coupling region @xcite perturbation theory clarified bare coupling @xmath7 lattice spacing @xmath8 @xcite work extrapolate large @xmath9 behavior bare coupling to free behavior weak coupling reformulate strong coupling expansion changing primary variable from bare coupling to lattice spacing lattice regularization spacing @xmath9 appears enters physical quantities dimensionless correlation length @xmath10 represents physical length scale divided by @xmath9 strong coupling series @xmath11 @xmath12 determines @xmath9 dependence bare coupling roles of @xmath7 @xmath10 exchanged by inverting relation @xmath11 small @xmath10 series of @xmath7 weak coupling behavior perturbation theory present paper non - linear @xmath0 model two dimensions approximate asymptotic behavior bare coupling in continuum limit via large @xmath9 expansion model testing ground asymptotic freedom dynamical mass generation for @xmath6 @xcite case finite @xmath13 mass @xmath1 in momentum space defined zero momentum limit two - point field correlationlattice spacing @xmath9 in mass rescaled dimensionless @xmath1 in continuum limit @xmath8 strong coupling expansion gives series @xmath1 in @xmath14 inverting series @xmath3 power series in @xmath4 equivalent to @xmath9 expansion naive series confirm continuum behavior @xmath3 examine pad borel techniques continuum scaling at finite @xmath13 role borel transform dilation operation continuum limit response scale transformation on @xmath15 rescaling @xmath1 to @xmath16 in @xmath17 @xmath18 limit @xmath17 scales with exponent @xmath19 @xmath20 criterion scaling introducing @xmath21 defined @xmath22 expansion to finite orders in @xmath21 function @xmath23 expanding to @xmath24 setting @xmath25 @xmath26 limit @xmath27 with @xmath28 fixed obtain @xmath29 limit @xmath18 transitioned to limit @xmath30 cut off @xmath31 scaling behavior with exponent @xmath19 in power of @xmath32 universal quantity @xmath19 unchangedoperation on @xmath17 series form @xmath33 valid @xmath1 @xmath34 larger convergence radius borel transform original series interpret transform scale transformation need integrating @xmath35 to @xmath17 information @xmath15 range @xmath1 not obtained need lattice field theories behavior @xmath15 neighborhood @xmath36 two - dimensional square lattice continuous spin fields @xmath37 set sites action system by @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 fields constrained sites mass variable @xmath1 zero momentum limit propagator @xmath42 @xmath43 susceptibility @xmath44 second moment @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 dimension lattice space @xmath49 present work summarize continuum limit model @xmath9 expansion of @xmath3 perturbative renormalization group predicts @xmath6 correlation length behaves at weak coupling as @xmath50 multiplied constant @xmath51 specified non - perturbatively hasenfratz etcomputed via thermodynamic @xcite @xmath52 terms @xmath53 @xmath54 contributions @xmath55-loop levels three- four - loop results computed literature given as @xmath56 three higher loop contributions disappear continuum limit coupling take out limit series to finite order hand include three- four - loop contributions analysis @xmath57 functional form @xmath3 another multiplicative constant @xmath58 monte carlo data difference less than percent at @xmath59 two constants agree in @xmath13 limit difference between @xmath51 and @xmath58 negligible for @xmath6 estimation mass gap via strong coupling expansion becomes estimation of @xmath51 workmass @xmath1 approaches @xmath60 continuum limit physical mass @xmath61 by @xmath62 @xmath63 finite mass scale by @xmath64{2{-1/(n-2)}{k=1}{a\beta^k} from @xmath65 continuum @xmath3 four - loop order function of @xmath1 @xmath66 @xmath67 series expansion at @xmath1 borrow result work butera comi @xcite coupling series @xmath44 @xmath45 to @xmath68 expansion of @xmath1 powers @xmath3 @xmath69 inverting relation @xmath70 based series strong1 discuss approximation continuum limit pad - borel approximation scheme recover asymptotically free behavior twoloop2 from strong1 estimate @xmath51 @xmath13 limit bench mark approach consider case finite @xmath13 next section large @xmath13 limit one - loop contribution to @xmath3 survives @xmath71 borel transform by delta expansion @xcite logarithm expanded gives @xmath25 @xmath72 to order @xmath31using asymptotic expansion @xmath73 @xmath74 euler s constant @xmath75 in @xmath76 limit @xmath77 small @xmath78 finite result represents borel transform @xmath79 borel transform @xmath80 @xmath81=\log \bar x+\gamma_{e}$ ] using abbreviated simbol @xmath82 obtain @xmath83 @xmath1 expansion @xmath3 reads @xmath84 borel transform @xmath85th order coefficient by factorial @xmath85 @xmath86 pad method extrapolate series to @xmath87 resultant pad - borel approximants capture scaling behavior region examined behaviors @xmath88 approximants @xmath89 over pairs @xmath90 @xmath91 critical behavior logarithmic slowly varying good behaviors difference between @xmath92 and @xmath85 small numerical experiment compared approximants three types pad - borel borel only pad improvements result at @xmath93th order fig . 1 @xmath94 at 6th order two broken lines @xmath3 @xmath89 represent behaviors at continuumhorizontal axis corresponds @xmath95 @xmath96 pad only borel only improvement not sufficient asymptotic freedom pad only case @xmath97}$ fig . 1 insufficient pad - borel approximant shows improvement for quantitative approximation pade approximation improved at higher orders best performance pad - borel approximant every order focus on pad - borel approximant evaluation mass gap estimating @xmath51 estimation fitting @xmath98 to @xmath88 approximants @xmath94 @xmath99 adjusting value @xmath51 consider difference between @xmath99 @xmath98 plot changing value @xmath51 proper value @xmath51 two functions touch at point @xmath100 difference tiny over interval typical case in fig . 2 result estimation @xmath51 in table estimation1 list results around diagonal pad result in momentum space modification propagator to continuum limit @xmath105^{-1}$ ] large @xmath13 limit @xmath3 given gap equation propagator mass square @xmath1 obtain large @xmath1 series first- infinite - order improved actions see first reference @xcitefirst order follows @xmath106 infinite - order improvement right - hand side integral @xmath107 expansion @xmath3 in @xmath4 straightforward repeat procedure approximation scaling2 constant @xmath51 first inifinite orders improved actions change action induces value non - universal @xmath51 @xmath109 first infinite orders table estimation4 summarizes result approximation improved action improves approximation accuracy first infinite orders improved lattice action monte carlo analysis perturbation theory useful approach analyzed pad - borel approximants strong coupling expansion non - linear @xmath110 model good behaviors approximating continuum limit higher order computation result all @xmath13 including limit @xmath111 pad - borel approximants effective at larger @xmath87 smaller @xmath112 unwanted effects lattice artifacts omitted loop contributions weaker continuum scaling at smaller @xmath112 clearer sign asymptotic freedom near @xmath113 accurate evaluation mass gap all @xmath6 polyakov phys . lett. 59b 79 ( 1975 ). brzin j. zinn - justin 691 ( 1976 )guillou . rev . d14 2615 ( 1976 ) bardeen lee shrock . rev d14 985 ( 1976 )
| 0.56106
| 3,306
| 1,743
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,542
|
a new approach for signal parametrization , which consists of a specific regression model incorporating a discrete hidden logistic process , is proposed .
the model parameters are estimated by the maximum likelihood method performed by a dedicated expectation maximization ( em ) algorithm .
the parameters of the hidden logistic process , in the inner loop of the em algorithm , are estimated using a multi - class iterative reweighted least - squares ( irls ) algorithm .
an experimental study using simulated and real data reveals good performances of the proposed approach .
|
in the context of the predictive maintenance of the french railway switches ( or points ) which enable trains to be guided from one track to another at a railway junction , we have been brought to parameterize switch operations signals representing the electrical power consumed during a point operation ( see figure [ signal_intro ] ) .
the final objective is to exploit these parameters for the identification of incipient faults .
the method we propose to characterize signals is based on a regression model incorporating a discrete hidden process allowing abrupt or smooth switchings between various regression models .
this approach has a connection with the switching regression model introduced by quandt and ramsey @xcite and is very linked to the mixture of experts ( me ) model introduced by jordan and jacobs @xcite by the using of a time - dependant logistic transition function .
the me model , as discussed in @xcite , uses a conditional mixture modeling where the model parameters are estimated by the expectation maximization ( em ) algorithm @xcite@xcite .
other alternative approaches are based on hidden markov models in a context of regression @xcite .
a dedicated em algorithm including a multi - class iterative reweighted least - squares ( irls ) algorithm @xcite is proposed to estimate the model parameters .
section 2 introduces the proposed model and section 3 describes the parameters estimation via the em algorithm .
the fourth section is devoted to the experimental study using simulated data and real data .
we represent a signal by the random sequence @xmath0 of @xmath1 real observations , where @xmath2 is observed at time @xmath3 .
this sample is assumed to be generated by the following regression model with a discrete hidden logistic process @xmath4 , where @xmath5 : @xmath6 in this model , @xmath7 is the @xmath8-dimensional coefficients vector of a @xmath9 degree polynomial , @xmath10 is the time dependant @xmath8-dimensional covariate vector associated to the parameter @xmath7 and the @xmath11 are independent random variables distributed according to a gaussian distribution with zero mean and variance @xmath12 . this section defines the probability distribution of the process @xmath4 that allows the switching from one regression model to another .
the proposed hidden logistic process supposes that the variables @xmath13 , given the vector @xmath14 , are generated independently according to the multinomial distribution @xmath15 , where @xmath16 is the logistic transformation of a linear function of the time - dependant covariate @xmath17 , @xmath18 is the @xmath19-dimensional coefficients vector associated to the covariate @xmath20 and @xmath21 .
thus , given the vector @xmath14 , the distribution of @xmath22 can be written as : @xmath23 where @xmath24 if @xmath25 i.e when @xmath2 is generated by the @xmath26 regression model , and @xmath27 otherwise .
the pertinence of the logistic transformation in terms of flexibility of transition can be illustrated through simple examples with @xmath28 components . as it can be shown in figure [ logistic_function_k=2_p=012 ] ( left )
, the dimension @xmath29 of @xmath30 controls the number of changes in the temporal variation of @xmath31 .
more particularly , if the goal is to segment the signals into convex homogenous parts , the dimension @xmath29 of @xmath30 must be set to @xmath32 .
the quality of transitions and the change time point are controlled by the components values of the vector @xmath30 ( see figures [ logistic_function_k=2_p=012 ] ( middle ) and ( right ) ) . [
cols="^,^,^ " , ]
from the model given by equation ( [ eq.regression model ] ) , it can be proved that the random variable @xmath33 is distributed according to the normal mixture density @xmath34 where @xmath35 is the parameter vector to be estimated .
the parameter @xmath36 is estimated by the maximum likelihood method .
as in the classic regression models we assume that , given @xmath14 , the @xmath37 are independent .
this also involves the independence of @xmath2 @xmath38 .
the log - likelihood of @xmath36 is then written as : @xmath39 since the direct maximization of this likelihood is not straightforward , we use the expectation maximization ( em ) algorithm @xcite@xcite to perform the maximization .
the proposed em algorithm starts from an initial parameter @xmath40 and alternates the two following steps until convergence : [ [ e - step - expectation ] ] * e step ( expectation ) : * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + this step consists of computing the expectation of the complete log - likelihood @xmath41 , given the observations and the current value @xmath42 of the parameter @xmath36 ( @xmath43 being the current iteration ) : @xmath44\nonumber\\ & = & \sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{k=1}^k t^{(m)}_{ik}\log ( \pi_{ik}({\mathbf{w}})\mathcal{n}(x_{i};{\boldsymbol{\beta}}^t_k{\boldsymbol{r}}_{i},\sigma^2_k ) ) \enspace,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath45 is the posterior probability that @xmath2 originates from the @xmath26 regression model .
as shown in the expression of @xmath46 , this step simply requires the computation of @xmath47 .
[ [ m - step - maximization ] ] * m step ( maximization ) : * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in this step , the value of the parameter @xmath36 is updated by computing the parameter @xmath48 maximizing the expectation @xmath46 with respect to @xmath36 . the maximization of @xmath46 can be performed by separately maximizing @xmath49 the maximization of @xmath50 with respect to @xmath51 is a multinomial logistic regression problem weighted by the @xmath47 .
we use a multi - class iterative reweighted least squares ( irls ) algorithm @xcite@xcite@xcite to solve it . maximizing @xmath52 with respect to @xmath53 consists of analytically solving a weighted least - squares problem .
in addition to providing a signal parametrization , the proposed approach can be used to denoise and segment signals .
the denoised signal can be approximated by the expectation @xmath54 where @xmath55 is the parameters vector obtained at the convergence of the algorithm . on the other hand , a signal segmentation can also be deduced by computing the estimated label @xmath56 of @xmath2 : @xmath57 .
this section is devoted to the evaluation of the proposed algorithm using simulated and real data sets .
two evaluation criteria are used in the simulations : the misclassification rate between the simulated partition and the estimated partition and the euclidian distance between the denoised simulated signal and the estimated denoised signal normalized by the sample size @xmath1 .
the proposed approach is compared to the piecewise regression approach @xcite .
each signal is generated according to the regression model with a hidden logistic process defined by eq ( [ eq.regression model ] ) .
the number of states of the hidden variable is fixed to @xmath58 and the order of regression is set to @xmath59 .
the order of the logistic regression is fixed to @xmath60 what guarantees a segmentation into convex intervals .
we consider that all signals are observed over @xmath61 seconds . for each size
@xmath1 we generate 20 samples .
the values of assessment criteria are averaged over the 20 samples .
figure [ fig.error rates ] ( left ) shows the misclassification rate obtained by the two approaches in relation to the sample size @xmath1 .
it can be observed that the proposed approach is more stable for a few number of observations .
figure [ fig.error rates ] ( right ) shows the results obtained by the two approaches in terms of signal denoising .
it can be observed that the proposed approach provides a more accurate denoising of the signal compared to the piecewise regression approach . for the proposed model
, the optimal values of @xmath62 has also been estimated by computing the bayesian information criterion ( bic ) @xcite for @xmath63 varying from @xmath64 to @xmath65 and @xmath9 varying from @xmath27 to @xmath66 .
the simulated model , corresponding to @xmath58 and @xmath59 , has been chosen with the maximum percentage of @xmath67 .
this section presents the results obtained by the proposed model for signals of switch points operations .
one situation corresponding to a signal with a critical defect is presented .
the number of the regressive components is chosen in accordance with the number of the electromechanical phases of a switch points operation ( @xmath68 ) .
the value of @xmath29 has been set to @xmath32 , what guarantees a segmentation into convex intervals , and the degree of the polynomial regression has been set to @xmath69 which is adapted to the different regimes in the signals .
figure [ resultat_signal_aig_2 ] ( left ) shows the original signal and the denoised signal ( given by equation ( [ eq .
signal expectation ] ) ) .
figure [ resultat_signal_aig_2 ] ( middle ) shows the variation of the proportions @xmath70 over time .
it can be observed that these probabilities are very closed to @xmath32 when the @xmath26 regressive model seems to be the most faithful to the original signal .
the five regressive components involved in the signal are shown in figure [ resultat_signal_aig_2 ] ( right ) .
in this paper a new approach for signals parametrization , in the context of the railway switch mechanism monitoring , has been proposed .
this approach is based on a regression model incorporating a discrete hidden logistic process .
the logistic probability function , used for the hidden variables , allows for smooth or abrupt switchings between polynomial regressive components over time .
in addition to signals parametrization , an accurate denoising and segmentation of signals can be derived from the proposed model .
b. krishnapuram , l. carin , m.a.t .
figueiredo and a.j .
hartemink , sparse multinomial logistic regression : fast algorithms and generalization bounds , _ ieee transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , _
27(6 ) : 957 - 968 , june 2005 .
s. r. waterhouse , _ classification and regression using mixtures of experts , _ phd thesis , department of engineering , cambridge university , 1997 .
v. e. mcgee and w. t. carleton , piecewise regression , _ journal of the american statistical association _ , 65 , 1109 - 1124 , 1970 .
|
context predictive maintenance french railway switches trains track junction parameterize switch operations signals electrical power consumed point operation figure signal_intro objective exploit parameters for identification incipient faults method signals based regression model hidden process switchings between regression models approach switching regression model quandt ramsey linked mixture experts me model jordan jacobs time - dependant logistic transition function me model uses conditional mixture modeling model parameters estimated by expectation maximization em algorithm @xcite alternative approaches hidden markov models regression @xcite dedicated em algorithm multi - class iterative reweighted least - squares algorithm proposed estimate model parameters section 2 introduces proposed model section 3 describes parameters estimation em algorithm fourth section experimental study simulated data real data represent signal by random sequence @xmath0 @xmath1 real observations @xmath2 observed at time @xmath3sample assumed generated by regression model hidden logistic process @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7-dimensional coefficients vector @xmath9 degree polynomial @xmath10 time dependant @xmath8-dimensional covariate vector @xmath7 @xmath11 independent random variables gaussian distribution zero mean variance @xmath12 defines probability distribution process @xmath4 switching from regression model proposed logistic process supposes variables @xmath13 @xmath14 generated independently multinomial distribution @xmath15 @xmath16 logistic transformation linear function time - dependant covariate @xmath17 @xmath18-dimensional coefficients vector covariate @xmath20 @xmath21 distribution of @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 generated @xmath26 regression model @xmath27 logistic transformation flexibility transition illustrated examples @xmath28 components dimension @xmath29 of @xmath30 controls temporal variation of @xmath31 goal segment signals into convex homogenous parts dimension @xmath29 set to @xmath32quality transitions change time point controlled by components values vector @xmath30 see figures logistic_function_k=2_p=012 middle right cols="^ model equation.regression model random variable @xmath33 distributed according to normal mixture density @xmath34 @xmath35 parameter vector estimated parameter @xmath36 estimated by maximum likelihood method assume @xmath14 @xmath37 independent involves independence of @xmath2 @xmath38 log - likelihood of @xmath36 written as @xmath39 direct maximization straightforward use expectation maximization algorithm @xcite maximizationproposed algorithm starts from initial parameter @xmath40 alternates two steps until convergence e - step - expectation step expectation ) : computing expectation of complete log - likelihood @xmath41 observations current value @xmath42 of parameter @xmath36 ( @xmath43 current iteration ) : @xmath44\nonumber\\ \sum_{i=1_{k=1}\log\mathcal{n}(x_^2_k @xmath45 is posterior probability @xmath2 originates from @xmath26 regression model step requires computation of @xmath47 m - step - maximization step : value of parameter @xmath36 updated by computing parameter @xmath48 maximizing expectation @xmath46 @xmath36 maximization of @xmath46 performed by separately maximizing @xmath49 maximization of @xmath50 with respect to @xmath51 is multinomial logistic regression problem weighted by @xmath47 multi - class iterative reweighted least squares algorithm @xcite solve maximizing @xmath52 with respect to @xmath53 analytically solving weighted least - squares problemsignal parametrization proposed approach denoise segment signals denoised signal approximated by expectation @xmath54 @xmath55 is parameters vector at convergence algorithm signal segmentation deduced by computing estimated label @xmath56 of @xmath2 : @xmath57 section evaluation proposed algorithm using simulated real data sets two evaluation criteria misclassification rate between simulated estimated partition euclidian distance between denoised normalized by sample size @xmath1 proposed approach compared to piecewise regression approach each signal generated according regression model with hidden logistic process defined by number of states of hidden variable fixed to @xmath58 order of regression set to @xmath59 order logistic regression fixed to @xmath60 segmentation into convex intervals all signals observed over @xmath61 seconds for each size @xmath1 20 samples values assessment criteria averaged over 20 samples shows misclassification rate two approaches sample size @xmath1 proposed approach more stable for observations results signal denoising proposed approach provides more accurate denoising piecewise regressionproposed model optimal values of @xmath62 estimated by computing bayesian information criterion @xcite for @xmath63 to @xmath9 from to @xmath66 simulated model to @xmath58 and @xmath59 chosen with maximum percentage of @xmath67 section presents results for signals switch points operations one situation to signal with critical defect presented regressive components chosen with electromechanical phases of switch points operation ( @xmath68 ) value of @xmath29 set to @xmath32 segmentation into convex intervals degree polynomial regression set to @xmath69 adapted to different regimes signals figure shows original signal denoised signal variation of proportions @xmath70 over time probabilities closed to @xmath32 when @xmath26 regressive model faithful to original signal five regressive components in signal shown in figure_2 right new approach for signals parametrization railway switch mechanism monitoring proposed approach based on regression model hidden logistic process logistic probability function allows smooth switchings between polynomial regressive components over time accurate denoising and segmentation of signals derived from proposed modelkrishnapuram carin figueiredo hartemink multinomial logistic regression fast algorithms generalization pattern analysis machine intelligence 27(6 ) 957 - 968 june 2005 waterhouse classification regression experts phd thesis engineering cambridge university 1997 mcgee carleton piecewise regression american statistical association 65 1109 - 1124 1970
| 0.430101
| 2,384
| 1,213
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,561
|
the equations providing to describe generation process in fel with varied parameters of diffraction grating ( photonic crystal ) are obtained .
it is shown that applying diffraction gratings ( photonic crystal ) with the variable period one can significantly increase radiation output .
it is mentioned that diffraction gratings ( photonic crystal ) can be used for creation of the dynamical wiggler with variable period in the system .
this makes possible to develop double - cascaded fel with variable parameters changing , which efficiency can be significantly higher that of conventional system . , free electron laser , travelling wave tube , backward wave oscillator , diffraction grating , smith - purcell radiation , diffraction radiation , photonic crystal 41.60.c , 41.75.f , h , 42.79.d
|
generators using radiation from an electron beam in a periodic slow - wave circuit ( travelling wave tubes , backward wave oscillators , free electron lasers ) are now widespread @xcite .
diffraction radiation @xcite in periodical structures is in the basis of operation of travelling wave tubes ( twt ) @xcite , backward wave oscillators ( bwo ) and such devices as smith - purcell lasers @xcite and volume fels using two- or three - dimensional distributed feedback @xcite .
analysis shows that during operation of such devices electrons lose their energy for radiation , therefore , the electron beam slows down and gets out of synchronism with the radiating wave .
these limits the efficiency of generator , which usually does not exceed @xmath0 . in the first years after creation of travelling wave tube
it was demonstrated @xcite that to retain synchronism between the electron beam and electromagnetic wave in a twt change of the wave phase velocity should be provided .
application of systems with variable parameters in microwave devices allows significant increase of efficiency of such devices @xcite .
the same methods for efficiency increase are widely used for undulator fels @xcite . in the present paper
we consider generation process in smith - purcell fels , volume fels , travelling wave tubes and backward wave oscillators using photonic crystal built from metal threads @xcite .
it is shown that applying diffraction gratings ( photonic crystal ) with the variable period one can significantly increase radiation output .
it is also shown that diffraction gratings ( photonic crystal ) can be used for creation of the dynamical wiggler with variable period in the system .
this makes possible to develop double - cascaded fel with variable parameters changing , which efficiency can be significantly higher that of conventional system .
in general case the equations , which describe lasing process , follow from the maxwell equations : @xmath1 here @xmath2 and @xmath3 are the electric and magnetic fields , @xmath4 and @xmath5 are the current and charge densities , the electromagnetic induction @xmath6 and , therefore , @xmath7 , the indices @xmath8 correspond to the axes @xmath9 , respectively .
the current and charge densities are respectively defined as : @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the electron charge , @xmath12 is the velocity of the particle @xmath13 ( @xmath13 numerates the beam particles ) , @xmath14- \frac{\vec{v}_{\alpha}}{c^2}(\vec{v}_{\alpha}(t)\vec{e}(\vec{r}_{\alpha}(t),t ) ) \right\},\label{sys1}\ ] ] here @xmath15 is the lorentz - factor , @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) is the electric ( magnetic ) field in the point of location @xmath18 of the particle @xmath13 .
it should be reminded that the equation ( [ sys1 ] ) can also be written as @xcite : @xmath19 \right\},\label{sys11}\ ] ] where @xmath20 is the particle momentum . combining the equations in ( [ sys0 ] ) we obtain : @xmath21
the dielectric permittivity tensor can be expressed as @xmath22 , where @xmath23 is the dielectric susceptibility . when @xmath24 the equation ( [ sys01 ] ) can be rewritten as : @xmath25 when the grating is ideal @xmath26 , where @xmath27 is the reciprocal lattice vector .
let the diffraction grating ( photonic crystal ) period is smoothly varied with distance , which is much greater then the diffraction grating ( ptotonic crystal lattice ) period .
it is convenient in this case to present the susceptibility @xmath23 in the form , typical for theory of x - ray diffraction in crystals with lattice distortion @xcite : @xmath28 where @xmath29 , @xmath30 is the reciprocal lattice vector in the vicinity of the point @xmath31 .
in contrast to the theory of x - rays diffraction , in the case under consideration @xmath32 depends on @xmath33 . it is to the fact that @xmath32 depends on the volume of the lattice unit cell @xmath34 , which can be significantly varied for diffraction gratings ( photonic crystals ) , as distinct from natural crystals .
the volume of the unit cell @xmath35 depends on coordinate and , for example , for a cubic lattice it is determined as @xmath36 , where @xmath37 are the lattice periods . if @xmath38 does not depend on @xmath33 , the expression ( [ chi01 ] ) converts to that usually used for x - rays in crystals with lattice distortion @xcite .
it should be reminded that for an ideal crystal without lattice distortions , the wave , which propagates in crystal can be presented as a superposition of the plane waves : @xmath39 where @xmath40 .
let us use now that in the case under consideration the typical length for change of the lattice parameters significantly exceeds lattice period .
this provides to express the field inside the crystal with lattice distortion similarly ( [ field ] ) , but with @xmath41 depending on @xmath33 and @xmath42 and noticeably changing at the distances much greater than the lattice period .
similarly , the wave vector should be considered as a slowly changing function of coordinate . according to the above
let us find the solution of ( [ 1 ] ) in the form : @xmath43 where @xmath44 , where @xmath45 can be found as solution of the dispersion equation in the vicinity of the point with the coordinate vector @xmath33 , integration is done over the quasiclassical trajectory , which describes motion of the wavepacket in the crystal with lattice distortion .
let us consider now case when all the waves participating in the diffraction process lays in a plane ( coupled wave diffraction , multiple - wave diffraction ) i.e. all the reciprocal lattice vectors @xmath27 lie in one plane @xcite .
suppose the wave polarization vector is orthogonal to the plane of diffraction .
let us rewrite ( [ * ] ) in the form @xmath46 where @xmath47 @xmath48 then multiplying ( [ 1 ] ) by @xmath49 one can get : @xmath50 applying the equality @xmath51 and using ( [ * 1 ] ) we obtain @xmath52 , \label{3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] therefore , substitution the above to ( [ 2 ] ) gives the following system : @xmath53 + \nonumber \\ % & & + \textrm{~conjugated~terms~ } % = 4 \pi \vec{e } \left ( \frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \vec{j}(\vec{r},t)}{\partial t } + \vec{\nabla } \rho ( \vec{r},t ) \right ) , \nonumber \\ % & & \frac{1}{2 } e^{i(\phi_{2 } ( \vec{r})-\omega t ) } [ 2i \vec{k}_2(\vec{r } ) \vec{\nabla } a_2 + i \vec{\nabla } \vec{k}_2 ( \vec{r } ) a_2 - k_2 ^ 2(\vec{r } ) a_2 + \nonumber \\ % & & + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2 } \varepsilon_0(\omega,\vec{r } ) a_2 + i
\frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \omega^2 \varepsilon_0(\omega,\vec{r})}{\partial \omega } \frac{\partial a_2}{\partial t } + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2 } \varepsilon_{\tau}(\omega,\vec{r } ) a_1 + i \frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \omega^2 \varepsilon_{\tau}(\omega,\vec{r})}{\partial \omega } \frac{\partial a_1}{\partial t } % ] + \nonumber \\ % & & + \textrm{~conjugated~terms~ } % = 4 \pi \vec{e } \left ( \frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \vec{j}(\vec{r},t)}{\partial t } + \vec{\nabla } \rho ( \vec{r},t ) \right ) , \label{3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the vector @xmath54 , @xmath55 , here notation @xmath56 is used , @xmath57 .
note here that for numerical analysis of ( [ 3 ] ) , if @xmath58 , it is convenient to take the vector @xmath59 in the form @xmath60 . for better understanding let us suppose that the diffraction grating ( photonic crystal lattice ) period changes along one direction and define this direction as axis @xmath61 . thus , for one - dimensional case , when @xmath62 the system ( [ 3 ] ) converts to the following : @xmath63 + \nonumber \\ % & & + \textrm{~conjugated~terms~ } % = 4 \pi \vec{e } \left ( \frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \vec{j}(\vec{r},t)}{\partial t } + \vec{\nabla } \rho ( \vec{r},t ) \right ) , \nonumber \\ % & & \frac{1}{2 } e^{i(\vec{k}_{\perp } \vec{r}_{\perp } + \phi_{2z}(z)-\omega t ) } [ 2i { k}_{2z}(z ) \frac{\partial a_2}{\partial z } + i
\frac{\partial { k}_{2z}(z)}{\partial z } a_2 - ( k_{\perp}^2+k_{2z}^2({z } ) ) a_2 + \nonumber \\ % & & + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2 } \varepsilon_0(\omega , z ) a_2 + i \frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \omega^2 \varepsilon_0(\omega , z)}{\partial \omega } \frac{\partial a_2}{\partial t } + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2 } \varepsilon_{\tau}(\omega , z ) a_1 + i \frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \omega^2 \varepsilon_{\tau}(\omega , z)}{\partial \omega } \frac{\partial a_1}{\partial t } % ] + \nonumber \\ % & & + \textrm{~conjugated~terms~ } % = 4 \pi \vec{e } \left ( \frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \vec{j}(\vec{r},t)}{\partial t } + \vec{\nabla } \rho ( \vec{r},t ) \right ) , \label{4}\end{aligned}\ ] ] let us multiply the first equation by @xmath64 and the second by @xmath65 .
this procedure provides to neglect the conjugated terms , which appear fast oscillating ( when averaging over the oscillation period they become zero ) .
considering the right part of ( [ 4 ] ) let us take into account that microscopic currents and densities are the sums of terms , containing delta - functions , therefore , the right part can be rewritten as : @xmath66 here @xmath67 is the time of entrance of particle @xmath13 to the resonator , @xmath68 is the time of particle leaving from the resonator , @xmath69functions in ( ref5 ) image the fact that for time moments preceding @xmath70 and following @xmath71 the particle @xmath72 does not contribute in process . let us suppose now that a strong magnetic field is applied for beam guiding though the generation area .
thus , the problem appears one - dimensional ( components @xmath73 and @xmath74 are suppressed ) .
averaging the right part of ( [ 5 ] ) over the particle positions inside the beam , points of particle entrance to the resonator @xmath75 and time of particle entrance to the resonator @xmath67 we can obtain : @xmath76 where @xmath5 is the electron beam density , @xmath77 is the mean electron beam velocity , which depends on time due to energy losses , @xmath78 , @xmath79 , @xmath80 indicates averaging over transversal coordinate of point of particle entrance to the resonator @xmath75 and time of particle entrance to the resonator @xmath67 . according to @xcite averaging procedure in ( [ 6 ] ) can be simplified , when consider that random phases , appearing due to random transversal coordinate and time of entrance , presents in ( [ 6 ] ) as differences .
therefore , double integration over @xmath81 can be replaced by single integration @xcite .
the system ( [ 4 ] ) in this case converts to : @xmath82 where the currents @xmath83 , @xmath84 are determined by the expression @xmath85
@xmath86 @xmath87 is the current density , @xmath88 , @xmath89 , @xmath90 , @xmath91 .
the expressions for @xmath83 for @xmath92 independent on @xmath61 was obtained in @xcite .
when more than two waves participate in diffraction process , the system ( [ sys2 ] ) should be supplemented with equations for waves @xmath93 , which are similar to those for @xmath94 and @xmath95 .
now we can find the equation for phase . from the expressions ( [ phi1],[phi2 ] ) it follows that @xmath96 let us introduce new function @xmath97 az follows : @xmath98 therefore , @xmath99 in the one - dimensional case the equation ( [ sys11 ] ) can be written as : @xmath100 therefore , @xmath101
@xmath102 @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath105,~ p \in [ -2 \pi , 2 \pi ] , ~l ~\textrm{is the length of the photonic crystal}.\ ] ] these equations should be supplied with the equations for @xmath106 .
it is well - known that @xmath107 therefore , @xmath108 the above obtained equations ( [ sys2],[cz],[cz2],[gamma1 ] ) provide to describe generation process in fel with varied parameters of diffraction grating ( photonic crystal ) .
analysis of the system ( [ cz2 ] ) can be simplified by replacement of the @xmath109 with its averaged by the initial phase value @xmath110 note that the law of parameters change can be both smooth and stair - step .
use of photonic crystals provide to develop different vfel arrangements ( see fig.[volume ] ) .
= 10 cm it should be noted that , for example , in the fel ( twt , bwo ) resonator with changing in space parameters of grating ( photonic crystal ) the electromagnetic wave with depending on @xmath61 spatial period is formed .
this means that the dynamical undulator with depending on @xmath61 period appears along the whole resonator length i. e. tapering dynamical wiggler becomes settled .
it is well known that tapering wiggler can significantly increase efficiency of the undulator fel . the dynamical wiggler with varied period , which is proposed , can be used for development of double - cascaded fel with parameters changing in space .
the efficiency of such system can be significantly higher that of conventional system .
moreover , the period of dynamical wiggler can be done much shorter than that available for wigglers using static magnetic fields .
it should be also noted that , due to dependence of the phase velocity of the electromagnetic wave on time , compression of the radiation pulse is possible in such a system .
the equations providing to describe generation process in fel with varied parameters of diffraction grating ( photonic crystal ) are obtained .
it is shown that applying diffraction gratings ( photonic crystal ) with the variable period one can significantly increase radiation output .
it is mentioned that diffraction gratings ( photonic crystal ) can be used for creation of the dynamical wiggler with variable period in the system .
this makes possible to develop double - cascaded fel with variable parameters changing , which efficiency can be significantly higher that of conventional system .
|
generators using radiation from electron beam in slow - wave circuit travelling wave tubes backward wave oscillators electron lasers widespread diffraction radiation in periodical structures basis operation of travelling wave tubes backward wave oscillators smith - purcell lasers volume fels using dimensional distributed feedback shows during electrons lose energy for radiation electron beam slows synchronism with radiating wave limits efficiency generator wave tube to retain synchronism change wave phase velocity should application of systems with variable parameters in microwave devices allows efficiency same methods for efficiency increase used for undulator fels paper generation process in smith - purcell fels volume fels travelling wave tubes backward wave oscillators using photonic crystal from metal threads applying diffraction gratings ( photonic crystal with variable period increase radiation output used for creation dynamical wiggler with variable period develop double - cascaded fel with variable parameters changing efficiency higher conventional systemequations describe lasing process follow from maxwell equations : @xmath1 are electric magnetic fields current charge densities electromagnetic induction @xmath6 @xmath7 indices @xmath8 correspond to axes @xmath9 current charge densities defined as @xmath10 @xmath11 electron charge velocity particle @xmath13 numerates beam particles @xmath14-{\vec{v}_\alpha}}{c^2}( @xmath15 is lorentz - factor @xmath16 electric magnetic ) field in point of location @xmath18 of particle @xmath13 equation sys1 written as @xcite @xmath19 @xmath20 is particle momentum combining equations obtain @xmath21 dielectric permittivity tensor expressed as @xmath22 @xmath23 is dielectric susceptibility @xmath24 equation rewritten as @xmath25 grating ideal @xmath26 @xmath27 reciprocal lattice vector diffraction grating ( photonic crystal ) period varied with distance greater then diffraction grating crystal lattice ) periodpresent susceptibility @xmath23 typical for x - ray diffraction in crystals with lattice distortion @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 reciprocal lattice vector point @xmath31 contrast @xmath32 depends on @xmath33 depends on volume lattice unit cell @xmath34 varied for diffraction gratings photonic crystals volume unit cell @xmath35 depends on coordinate cubic lattice determined as @xmath36 @xmath37 are lattice periods if @xmath38 depend on @xmath33 expression ( chi01 ] converts to for x - rays in crystals lattice distortion ideal crystal without lattice distortions wave presented as superposition of plane waves : @xmath39 where @xmath40 typical length for change lattice parameters exceeds lattice period express field inside crystal with lattice distortion @xmath41 on @xmath33 and @xmath42 changing at distances greater than lattice period wave vector slowly changing function of coordinatefind solution ( [ 1 ] ) form @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 solution dispersion equation vicinity point coordinate vector @xmath33 integration over quasiclassical trajectory motion wavepacket crystal with lattice distortion consider case waves diffraction plane coupled wave multiple - wave diffraction reciprocal lattice vectors @xmath27 one plane @xcite wave polarization vector orthogonal plane diffractionrewrite * ) @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 multiplying 1 @xmath49 @xmath50 equality @xmath51 using 1 obtain @xmath52{3}\end{aligned substitution 2 ] ) gives system @xmath53 + \nonumber %\textrm{~conjugated~terms = 4 \vec{e\frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \vec{j{r}{\partial t } \vec{\nabla }\vec{r} \nonumber % \frac{1}{2 }{2 \vec{r-\omega t \vec{k_2({r {\nabla + \vec{\nabla {k_2_2 -_2 2 + \nonumber % \frac{\omega^2}{c^2 }_0{r a_2 + \frac{1}{c^2\frac{\partial \omega^2{\partial \omega{\partial{\partial t } \frac{\omega^2}{c^2 }\omega{r a_1 + \frac{1}{c^2\frac{\partial\omega^2{}\vec{r})\partial\partial a_1}{ t %\nonumber\textrm{~conjugated~terms % = 4 \vec{e\left\frac{1}{c^2{\partial \vec{j}(\vec{r},t){\partial t }\vec{\nabla } \vec{r},t )\label{3}\end{aligned} vector @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 numerical analysis 3 ] ) @xmath58 vector @xmath59 @xmath60 diffraction grating photonic crystal lattice period changes direction axis @xmath61 one - dimensional case @xmath62 system converts @xmath63 +\nonumber %\textrm{~conjugated~terms % = 4\vec{e\frac{1}{c^2\frac{\partial\vec{j{\partial t\vec{\nabla\vec{r},t\nonumber %\frac{1}{2{k}_{\perp{r}_{\perp }\phi_{2z}(z)-\omega t k}_{2z}(z\frac{\partial_2{\partial z }\frac{\partial_{2z}(z{\partial z k{\perp}^2+k_{2z}^2({z \nonumber %\frac{\omega^2}{c^2\varepsilon_0(\omega z\frac{1}{c^2{\partial \omega^2_0{\partial \omega{\partial a_2{\partial t }{\omega^2}{c^2\varepsilon_{\tau}(\omega z\frac{1}{c^2{\partial \omega^2\varepsilon_{\tau}(\omega z{\partial \omega{\partiala_1}{\partial t } % +\nonumber \\\textrm{~conjugated~terms % = 4 \vec{e }\left \frac{1}{c^2 } \frac{\partial \vec{j}(\vec{r},t)}{ t } + \vec{\nabla } \vec{r},t )\right\label{4}\end{aligned} multiply first equation @xmath64 second @xmath65 neglect conjugated terms fast oscillating become zero microscopic currents densities sums of terms delta - functions rewritten @xmath66 @xmath67 time entrance particle @xmath13 resonator @xmath68 time particle leaving resonator @xmath69functions ref5 preceding @xmath70 @xmath71 particle @xmath72 contribute process strong magnetic field beam guiding generation area problem one - components @xmath73 @xmath74 suppressedaveraging right part ( [ 5 ] ) particle positions points entrance @xmath75 time @xmath76 @xmath5 electron beam density mean electron beam velocity depends on time energy losses @xmath78 averaging transversal coordinate entrance time @xcite averaging procedure ( [ 6 ] ) simplified random phases transversal coordinate time entrance 6 ] ) differences double integration over @xmath81 replaced by single integration @xcite system ( [ 4 ] ) converts to @xmath82 currents @xmath83 @xmath84 determined by expression @xmath85 @xmath86 current density @xmath88 expressions for @xmath83 @xmath92 independent on @xmath61 obtained in @xcite more than two waves diffraction system ( ] ) supplemented with equations for waves @xmath93 similar @xmath94 @xmath95 find equation for phase .expressions phi1],[phi2 ] @xmath96 new function @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 one - dimensional case equation ( [ sys11 ] written @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath105 -2 \pi 2 \pi\textrm length photonic crystal equations supplied with equations @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath108 equations ( [ sys2],[cz],[cz2],[gamma1 ] describe generation process in fel varied parameters diffraction grating photonic crystal ) analysis system ( cz2 ] ) simplified replacement @xmath109 averaged initial phase value @xmath110 law of parameters change smooth stair - step photonic crystals different vfel arrangements fig.[volume ] ) 10 cm fel ( twt bwo ) resonator changing parameters grating photonic crystal electromagnetic wave @xmath61 spatial period formed dynamical undulator @xmath61 period appears resonator length tapering dynamical wiggler settled efficiency undulator dynamical wiggler varied period development double - cascaded fel parameters changing space efficiency higher conventional systemperiod of dynamical wiggler shorter than using static magnetic fields due to dependence phase velocity electromagnetic wave on time compression of radiation pulse possible equations describe generation process in fel with varied parameters diffraction grating photonic crystal ) obtained applying diffraction gratings with variable period increase radiation output gratings used for creation dynamical wiggler with variable period develop double - cascaded fel with variable parameters changing efficiency higher conventional system
| 0.673234
| 3,645
| 1,961
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,572
|
an analysis of the sensitivity of gaussian and mexican hat wavelet family filters to the detection of point sources of ultra - high energy cosmic rays was performed .
a source embedded in a background was simulated and the number of events and amplitude of this source was varied aiming to check the sensitivity of the method to detect faint sources with low statistic of events .
|
the origin of the ultra - high energy cosmic rays ( uhecrs ) is still an unsolved problem in astroparticle physics .
a model for acceleration of cosmic rays , firstly devised by hillas@xcite predicts that cosmic rays are accelerated to the highest energies ( above 10@xmath0 ev ) by electromagnetic fields of astrophysical objects .
therefore , the identication of possible astrophysical sources of uhecrs is possible by analysing the arrival directions of the cosmic rays .
the correlation of the positions of point - like astrophysical objects ( point sources ) with the arrival directions of cosmic rays defines a small scale anisotropy . in the search of point - like sources
it is a common procedure to convolve the sky maps containing arrival directions of cosmic rays with mathematical functions ( the kernel of the convolution operation ) aiming to optimize the signal to noise ratio . in this work
it is studied the performance of some kernels of the mexican hat wavelet family ( mhwf ) to identify point sources of cosmic rays , and disentangle genuine signals from the background .
wavelets are defined as mathematical functions belonging to the @xmath1 space .
they can be thought as localized wave - like oscillating functions which can be operated with a given signal and provide information about it .
the continuous wavelet transform ( cwt ) in two dimensions may be formally written as @xmath2 where @xmath3 ( @xmath4 , @xmath5 ) is the scaling factor and @xmath6 and @xmath7 ( @xmath8 ) are the translation parameters .
so , the cwt decomposes a function @xmath9 in a basis of wavelet @xmath10 .
one can scale and translate a mother - wavelet " @xmath11 and obtain a wavelet @xmath10 , as follows : @xmath12 the mexican hat wavelet family ( mhwf ) , introduced by gonzlez - nuevo _ et al_.@xcite , and its extension on the sphere have been widely used to detect point sources in maps of cosmic microwave background radiation@xcite , due to the amplification of the signal - to - noise ratio ( snr ) when transiting from real to wavelet space .
the mhwf is obtained by successive application of the laplacian operator to the two - dimensional gaussian @xmath13 .
a generic member of this family , of order @xmath14 , is : @xmath15
celestial maps are pixelations of the celestial sphere taking into account the angular resolution of the experiment .
the events map is a celestial map representing the arrival directions of cosmic rays in a suitable coordinate system . due to intrinsic limitations of detector
, every event detected is convolved with a probability related to the angular resolution of the detector , which means that there is a point spreading function ( psf ) associated to the detector .
the convolution of celestial maps with filters is given by : @xmath16 where @xmath17 is the number of cosmic rays within the pixel of index @xmath18 , in the direction @xmath19 .
@xmath20 is the used filter and @xmath21 is the position vector representing the point where the integral is being calculated .
this work is an extension of previous ones@xcite .
the simulated detector has two sites , one located in the southern hemisphere ( 36@xmath22 s and 65@xmath22 w ) , and the other in the northern hemisphere ( 38@xmath22 n and 102@xmath22 w ) , seven times larger than the one in the south , implying on a flux of cosmic rays seven times greater .
the acceptance law has the form @xmath23 , where @xmath24 is the zenith angle .
it was also considered the case of an ideal detector with uniform exposure and full sky coverage .
it was simulated a point source located at ( l , b)=(320@xmath22,30@xmath22 ) ( galactic coordinates ) .
this source was modeled by a gaussian : @xmath25 and was embedded in a background consisting on a superposition of four different patterns of arrival directions of cosmic rays .
the simulated patterns were : ( i ) an isotropic distribution of events ; ( ii),(iii ) dipoles , modeled according to @xmath26 , where @xmath27 is the flux of cosmic rays , @xmath28 is related to the isotropic flux , @xmath29 is the amplitude of the dipole ( @xmath30 for ( ii ) and @xmath31 for ( iii ) ) , @xmath32 is the vector which points towards the dipole ( @xmath33 = @xmath34 ) for ( ii ) and @xmath33 = @xmath35 ) for ( iii ) ) and @xmath36 is a unit vector pointing in an arbitrary direction@xcite ; ( iv ) several sources modeled according to equation [ eq : source ] , in the directions @xmath33 : @xmath34 [ @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 [ @xmath40 , @xmath41 , @xmath42 [ @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 [ @xmath46 , @xmath41 , @xmath47 [ @xmath48 , @xmath49 , @xmath50 [ @xmath51 , @xmath41 , @xmath52 [ @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 [ @xmath56 , @xmath57 , @xmath58 [ @xmath59 , @xmath60 and @xmath61 [ @xmath46 , @xmath62 .
this last background pattern was included in the simulation because unknown sources might be present during an analysis tagged on a given source , and their effects must be evaluated . from this combination of source ( signal ) and
background patterns ( noise ) , it was obtained the events map .
the events map resulting from the sum of the background patterns and the simulated source was convolved with gaussian and mhwf ( orders 1 , 2 and 3 ) filters .
the amplification of the snr ( @xmath63 ) is calculated by the expression @xmath64 where @xmath65 is the value of the central pixel associated to the source in the non - filtered source map , @xmath66 is the corresponding value in the filtered source map , @xmath67 is the root mean square ( rms ) of the non - filtered background map and @xmath68 is the rms of the filtered background map .
aiming to study the impact of the number of events from the source and its intensity upon the filter , different number of events ( @xmath69 ) were simulated in the direction of the source , ranging from 10 events up to 1000 .
the amplitude of the gaussian source ( @xmath70 ) was also varied , from @xmath71 to @xmath72 .
in figures [ fig : evt ] and [ fig : amp ] it is shown the maximum amplification of the snr , as a function of the corresponding scale . in the case of figure
[ fig : evt ] , @xmath69 is fixed and @xmath70 is varied . for figure
[ fig : amp ] , @xmath70 is fixed and @xmath69 from the source is varied . from figure [ fig : evt ] it can be noted that the uniform exposure acts like a constraint for @xmath63 , and that the gaussian has a slightly better performance than the mhwf filters .
the maximum amplification for nonuniform exposure is clearly achieved by using mhwf filters , whereas the gaussian filter has amplification close to 1 , which means no amplification . comparing the two graphs in figure [ fig : evt ] , in the bottom graph the amplification is greater , which seems reasonable since the number of events in this case is 100 times greater . in figure
[ fig : amp ] it can be seen the behavior of the filters when @xmath70 is varied .
for the uniform exposure the amplification of both the gaussian and the mhwf filters are low , but the gaussian has a slightly better performance . comparing the top and bottom graphs in figure [ fig : amp ] , it is clear that the amplification achieved by the filters is proportional to @xmath69 .
also , when there is an acceptance , the gaussian filter does not provide a good amplification of the snr , which can be achieved by using the mhwf .
in this work it was analyzed the performance of the gaussian and the mhwf filters to detect point sources of cosmic rays embedded in a non uniform background , whose features are modulated both by the acceptance of the detector and the background patterns imposed to the incoming particles . some parameters from the source such as the amplitude @xmath70 and the number of events
@xmath69 were varied , and the effects of theses changes on amplification of the snr was studied .
the trivial conclusion is that the amplification achieved by these kernels is proportional to the source intensity parameters ( @xmath70 and @xmath69 ) .
it is interesting to notice that for a realistic case , i. e. , a source with low amplitude and only a few events coming from its direction , the amplifications achieved are low for both filters .
the mhwf filters are more robust to these parameters and can provide a greater amplification of the snr even if @xmath69 is small . regarding the contribution of the acceptance of the experiment for the detection , it can be clearly seen that for uniform exposure the amplifications are smaller . in this case , the gaussian filter provides a slightly better amplification compared to the mhwf . however , for a more realistic case taking into account the nonuniform exposure of the detector , the mhwf filters always achieve a greater amplification . also , they are more robust to low statistic of events , which makes them particularly useful for cosmic ray studies .
|
origin of ultra - high energy cosmic rays unsolved problem in astroparticle physics model for acceleration by hillas@xcite predicts accelerated above 10@xmath0 ev by electromagnetic fields astrophysical objects identication of sources uhecrs by analysing arrival directions correlation of positions of point - astrophysical objects with arrival directions rays defines small scale anisotropy convolve sky maps with mathematical functions optimize signal to noise ratio studied performance of kernels of mexican hat wavelet family ) to identify point sources rays disentangle genuine signals from background wavelets as mathematical functions @xmath1 space localized wave - like oscillating functions operated with given signal provide information continuous wavelet transform ( cwt ) in two written as @xmath2 scaling factor translation parameters cwt decomposes function @xmath9 in basis wavelet @xmath10 scale and translate mother - wavelet @xmath11 obtain wavelet @xmath10 @xmath12 mexican hat wavelet family introduced by gonzlez - nuevo et al@xcite extension used detect point sources cosmic microwave radiation due to amplification signal - to - noise ratio transiting real to wavelet space mhwf obtained by application laplacian operator to two - dimensional gaussian @xmath13 generic member @xmath14 @xmath15 celestial maps pixelations celestial sphere angular resolution events map arrival directions cosmic rays coordinate system limitations event detected convolved with probability related angular resolution detector point spreading function psf ) associated detector convolution of celestial maps with filters given by @xmath16 @xmath17 number cosmic rays within pixel index @xmath18 direction @xmath19 @xmath20 used filter @xmath21 position vector integral calculated work extension of previous@xcite simulated detector has two sites one southern hemisphere 36 65 northern hemisphere 38 n 102 w seven times larger south flux cosmic rays seven times greater acceptance law form @xmath23 @xmath24 zenith angle ideal detector uniform exposure full sky coverage simulated point source at (=(320@xmath22,30@xmath22 ) galactic coordinatessource modeled by gaussian : @xmath25 embedded in background superposition of four patterns of arrival directions of cosmic rays simulated patterns were isotropic distribution of events ; ii),(iii ) dipoles modeled according to @xmath26 @xmath27 is flux of cosmic rays @xmath28 related to isotropic flux @xmath29 is amplitude of dipole @xmath30 @xmath32 vector towards dipole @xmath33 = @xmath34 @xmath36 unit vector pointing in arbitrary direction iv ) several sources modeled according to equation [ eq : source ] in directions @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath37 @xmath39 @xmath50 @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath61 [ @xmath46 @xmath62 last background pattern included in simulation because unknown sources might be present during analysis source effects must be evaluated from combination of source ( signal ) and background patterns ( noise ) obtained events map events map from background patterns simulated source convolved with gaussian mhwf 1 2 3 filters amplification of snr ( @xmath63 ) calculated by expression @xmath64 @xmath65 value central pixel source non - filtered @xmath66 corresponding value in filtered source map @xmath67 root mean square of non - filtered @xmath68 rms filtered impact events from source intensity upon filter different number of events ( @xmath69 ) simulated in direction source from 10 up to 1000 amplitude of gaussian source ( @xmath70 ) varied from @xmath71 to @xmath72 in figures fig evt amp maximum amplification of snr function of corresponding scale figure evt @xmath69 fixed @xmath70 varied figure amp ] @xmath70 fixed @xmath69 source varied uniform exposure constraint for @xmath63 gaussian better performance than mhwf filters maximum amplification for nonuniform exposure mhwf filters gaussian filter amplification close to 1 no amplification two graphs bottom graph amplification greater number of events 100 times greater figure amp behavior of filters when @xmath70 varieduniform exposure amplification of gaussian and mhwf filters low gaussian slightly better performance comparing top bottom graphs in figure amplification filters proportional to @xmath69 acceptance gaussian filter good amplification of snr achieved by using mhwf work analyzed performance gaussian and mhwf filters to detect point sources cosmic rays in non uniform background modulated by acceptance detector background patterns particles parameters source amplitude @xmath70 number of events @xmath69 varied effects on amplification snr studied conclusion amplification kernels proportional to source intensity parameters ( @xmath70 and @xmath69 ) realistic case source with low amplitude few events direction amplifications low for both filters mhwf filters more robust to parameters provide greater amplification snr even if @xmath69 small contribution acceptance experiment detection for uniform exposure amplifications smaller gaussian filter slightly better amplification compared to mhwf realistic case nonuniform exposure mhwf filters achieve greater amplification more robust to low statistic of events useful for cosmic ray studies
| 0.322863
| 2,100
| 1,059
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,580
|
the presence of @xmath0-exchange in electron proton elastic scattering is discussed . from c - invariance and crossing symmetry , @xmath0 contribution induces a specific dependence of the reduced cross section on the variable @xmath1 .
no evidence of such dependence exists in the available experimental data .
_ this talk is dedicated to the memory of professor michail p. rekalo _
|
in 1999 m. p. rekalo and myself investigated the possible presence of @xmath0 exchange @xcite in the precise data on the structure function @xmath2 , obtained at the jefferson laboratory ( jlab ) in @xmath3 elastic scattering , up to a value of momentum transfer squared , @xmath4 gev@xmath5 @xcite .
a prescription for the differential cross section was derived from general properties of the hadron electromagnetic interaction , as the c - invariance and the crossing symmetry .
the discrepancy from the two experiments @xcite , which had been performed in different kinematical conditions , could not be explained in terms of a @xmath0 contribution , but the possibility of @xmath0-corrections was not excluded , starting from @xmath6 gev@xmath5 and the necessity of dedicated experiments was pointed out @xcite .
the relative contribution of @xmath0 exchange , through its interference with the main ( i.e. , one - photon ) mechanism is expected to be of the order of the fine structure constant , @xmath7 .
but , more than 30 years ago , it was observed @xcite that the relative role of two - photon exchange can essentially increase in the region of high momentum transfer , due to the steep decreasing of the form factors ( ffs ) .
this effect can be observed in particular in @xmath8-elastic scattering where it would appear already at momentum transfer squared of the order of 1 gev@xmath5 .
the main consequence of the presence of @xmath0 exchange is that the traditional description of the electron - hadron interaction in terms of electromagnetic currents ( and electromagnetic ffs ) can become incorrect . in one - photon exchange , two real amplitudes ( functions of one variable , @xmath9 )
fully describe elastic @xmath10 scattering .
if the @xmath0 exchange is present , one has to deal with three complex amplitudes , which are functions of two kinematical variables , @xmath9 and the polarization of the virtual photon , @xmath1 .
the presence of @xmath0 exchange leads to very complicated analysis of polarization effects .
it destroys the linearity in the variable @xmath1 of the differential cross section for elastic @xmath11 scattering @xcite , and the relatively simple dependence of the ratio @xmath12 ( the components of the final nucleon polarization in the scattering of longitudinally polarized electrons by an unpolarized nucleon target ) on the ratio of the electric and magnetic ffs , @xmath13 , which holds for the one - photon mechanism @xcite .
it can be shown that the situation is not so involved , and that even in case of two - photon exchange , one can still use the formalism of ffs , if one takes into account the c - invariance of the electromagnetic interaction of hadrons @xcite . however , in this case only either a specific combination of three t - odd ( or five t - even ) polarization observables or measurements with positron and electron beams in the same kinematical conditions allow a model independent determination of ffs .
the exact calculation of the @xmath0-contribution to the amplitude of the @xmath14-process requires the knowledge of the matrix element for the double virtual compton scattering , @xmath15 , in a large kinematical region of colliding energy and virtuality of both photons , and can not be done in a model independent form .
therefore we follow another approach : general properties of the hadron electromagnetic interaction , as the c - invariance and the crossing symmetry , give rigorous prescriptions for different observables for the elastic scattering of electrons and positrons by nucleons , in particular for the differential cross section and for the proton polarization , induced by polarized electrons .
these concrete prescriptions help in identifying a possible manifestation of the two - photon exchange mechanism and to avoid unjustified assumptions .
for example , symmetry properties appear in the spin structure of the amplitudes , with respect to the change @xmath16 with @xmath17 .
crossing symmetry allows to connect the matrix elements for the cross - channels : @xmath18 , in @xmath19channel , and @xmath20 , in @xmath21channel .
the c - invariance of the electromagnetic hadron interaction and the corresponding selection rules can be applied to the annihilation channel and this allows to find specific properties for one and two photon exchanges . to illustrate this ,
let us consider firstly the one - photon mechanism for @xmath22 .
the conservation of the total angular momentum , @xmath23 , allows one value , @xmath24 , and the quantum numbers of the photon : @xmath25 , @xmath26 .
the selection rules with respect to c and p - invariances allow two states for @xmath27 ( and @xmath28 ) : @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the total spin and @xmath31 is the orbital angular momentum . as a result ,
the @xmath32-dependence of the cross section for @xmath22 , in the one - photon exchange mechanism is : @xmath33 where @xmath34 and @xmath35 are definite quadratic contributions of @xmath36 and @xmath37 , @xmath38 at @xmath39 .
let us consider now the @xmath40-dependence of the @xmath41-interference contribution to the differential cross section of @xmath22 .
the spin and parity of the @xmath0-states is not fixed , in general , but only a positive value of c - parity , @xmath42 , is allowed .
an infinite number of states with different quantum numbers can contribute , and their relative role is determined by the dynamics of the process @xmath43 , with both virtual photons .
but the @xmath40-dependence of the contribution to the differential cross section for the @xmath41-interference has a c - odd nature : @xmath44 , \label{eq : sig3}\ ] ] where @xmath45 , @xmath46 are real coefficients , which are functions of @xmath21 , only .
the following relation between kinematical variables in the crossing channels holds : @xmath47 .
this odd @xmath40 ( or @xmath48)-dependence is essentially different from the even @xmath40-dependence of the cross section for the one - photon approximation . it is , therefore , incorrect to approximate the interference contribution to the differential cross section ( [ eq : sig3 ] ) by a linear function in @xmath49 , because it is in contradiction with the c - invariance of hadronic electromagnetic interaction .
it follows that , in presence of @xmath0 exchange , the reduced elastic @xmath10 cross section can be rewritten in the following general form : @xmath50 where @xmath51 is a real function describing the effects of the @xmath41 interference . in order to estimate the upper limit for a possible @xmath0 contribution to the differential cross section and the corresponding changing to @xmath52
, we analyzed four sets of data @xcite , applying eq .
( [ eq : sred2 ] ) with the following parametrization for @xmath51 : @xmath53 } ^2/0.71)^2(1 + q^2\mbox{[gev]}^2/m^2)^2 } , \label{eq : sfit}\ ] ] -1.3 true cm -.7 true cm figure 1 . from top to bottom : @xmath54 , @xmath55 and the two - photon contribution , @xmath56 .
@xmath57 is the proton magnetic moment , @xmath58/0.71)^{-2}$ ] .
published data are shown as open symbols , the present results which include the @xmath0 contribution as solid symbols . where @xmath56 is a fitting parameter
, @xmath59 is the mass of a tensor or vector meson with positive c - parity . for @xmath60 gev
, one can predict that the relative role of the @xmath0 contribution should increase with @xmath9 .
it is important to stress that eq .
( [ eq : sfit ] ) is a simple expression which contains the necessary symmetry properties of the @xmath41 interference , through a specific ( and non linear ) @xmath1 dependence .
therefore , in presence of @xmath0 , the dependence of the reduced cross section on @xmath1 can be parametrized as a function of three parameters , @xmath61 , @xmath62 and @xmath56 , according to eqs .
( [ eq : sred2 ] ) and ( [ eq : sfit ] ) . in fig .
1 , from top to bottom , the electric and magnetic ffs , as well as the two photon parameter @xmath56 , are shown as a function of @xmath9 ( solid symbols ) . the previously published data , derived from the traditional rosenbluth fits , are also shown ( open symbols ) .
including a third fitting parameter , @xmath56 , increases the errors on the extracted ffs .
the resulting parameter @xmath56 is compatible with zero .
from the present analysis it appears that the available data on @xmath10 elastic scattering does not show any evidence of deviation from the linearity of the rosenbluth fit , and hence of the presence of the @xmath0 contribution , when parametrized according to eq .
( [ eq : sfit ] ) . besides the deviation from the linearity of the rosenbluth fit , other possible methods to test the presence of @xmath0-exchange in elastic electron hadron scattering can be listed : comparison of the cross section for scattering of unpolarized electrons and positrons ( by protons or deuterons ) in the same kinematical conditions ; specific polarization phenomena such as the appearance of t - odd polarization observables ; violation of definite relations between t - even polarization observables and structure functions @xcite .
the experimental evidence of the presence of the @xmath0-exchange and its quantitative estimation is very important .
if this effect appears in elastic @xmath10 scattering already in the range of momentum transfer investigated at jlab , the findings based on the one - photon assumption , will have to be reanalyzed at the light of a new and complicated formalism . in this case , most of the advantages related to the electromagnetic probe would be lost , as it was indicated already long ago @xcite .
the results quoted here would not have been obtained wihout a fruitful collaboration and enlightning discussions with professor m. p. rekalo .
9 m. p. rekalo , e. tomasi - gustafsson and d. prout , phys . rev . *
c60 * , 042202 ( 1999 ) .
l. c. alexa _
et al . _ ,
lett . * 82 * , 1375 ( 1999 ) .
d. abbott _
et al . _ ,
lett . * 82 * , 1379 ( 1999 ) .
j. gunion and l. stodolsky , phys .
lett . * 30 * , 345 ( 1973);v .
franco , phys .
d * 8 * , 826 ( 1973 ) ; v. n. boitsov , l.a .
kondratyuk and v.b .
kopeliovich , sov .
* 16 * , 237 ( 1973 ) ; f. m. lev , sov .
* 21 * , 45 ( 1973 ) .
m. n. rosenbluth , phys . rev . * 79 * , 615 ( 1950 ) .
a. akhiezer and m. p. rekalo , dokl .
nauk ussr , * 180 * , 1081 ( 1968 ) ;
sov . j. part .
nucl . * 4 * , 277 ( 1974 ) ; m. p. rekalo and e. tomasi - gustafsson , lecture notes , arxiv : nucl - th/0202025 . m. p. rekalo and e. tomasi - gustafsson , eur .
j. a * 22 * , 331 ( 2004 ) ; nucl .
phys . a * 740 * , 271 ( 2004 ) ; nucl .
a * 742 * , 322 ( 2004 ) .
r. c. walker _ et al .
_ , phys .
d * 49 * , 5671 ( 1994 ) .
l. andivahis _ et al .
_ , phys .
d * 50 * , 5491 ( 1994 ) .
m. e. christy _ et al .
_ [ e94110 collaboration ] , phys . rev .
c * 70 * , 015206 ( 2004 ) .
i. a. qattan _ et al .
_ , arxiv : nucl - ex/0410010 .
|
1999 rekalo and myself investigated @xmath0 exchange in data structure function @xmath2 jefferson laboratory @xmath3 elastic scattering momentum transfer squared @xmath4 gev@xmath5 prescription for differential cross section derived from properties hadron electromagnetic interaction c - invariance crossing symmetry discrepancy from two experiments different kinematical conditions explained @xmath0 contribution possibility @xmath0-corrections not excluded from @xmath6 gev@xmath5 necessity of dedicated experiments pointed relative contribution @xmath0 exchange main - photon mechanism fine structure constant , @xmath7 30 years ago observed relative role two - photon exchange increase in high momentum transfer due to decreasing form factors ffs ) effect observed in @xmath8-elastic scattering at momentum transfer squared 1 gev@xmath5 consequence @xmath0 exchange traditional description electron - hadron interaction electromagnetic currents incorrect in one - photon exchange two amplitudes describe elastic @xmath10 scattering@xmath0 exchange present three complex amplitudes functions variables @xmath9 polarization virtual photon @xmath1 exchange complicated analysis polarization effects destroys linearity variable @xmath1 differential cross section elastic @xmath11 scattering @xcite dependence ratio @xmath12 final nucleon polarization scattering polarized electrons unpolarized nucleon target on ratio electric magnetic ffs @xmath13 one - photon mechanism @xcite situation not involved two - photon exchange use formalism of ffs c - invariance electromagnetic interaction hadrons @xcite three t - odd or five t - even ) polarization observables measurements with positron electron beams same conditions allow model independent determination of ffs calculation @xmath0-contribution to amplitude @xmath14-process requires knowledge matrix element double virtual compton scattering @xmath15 model approach general properties hadron electromagnetic interaction c - invariance crossing symmetry give rigorous prescriptions for observables elastic scattering of electrons positrons by nucleons differential cross section proton polarization polarized electronsprescriptions help two - photon exchange mechanism assumptions symmetry properties appear in spin structure amplitudes change @xmath16 with @xmath17 crossing symmetry matrix elements for cross - channels c - invariance of electromagnetic hadron interaction selection rules to annihilation channel specific properties for one two photon exchanges consider one - photon mechanism for @xmath22 conservation total angular momentum allows one value @xmath24 quantum numbers selection rules c and p - invariances allow two states for @xmath27 @xmath28 : total spin orbital angular momentum @xmath32-dependence of cross section for @xmath22 is @xmath33 @xmath34 are quadratic contributions of @xmath36 @xmath40-dependence of @xmath41-interference contribution to differential cross section of @xmath22 spin and parity of @xmath0-states not fixed positive value of c - parity @xmath42 allowed infinite number of states with different quantum numbers can contribute role determined by dynamics process @xmath43 virtual photons@xmath40-dependence differential cross section @xmath41-interference c - odd @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 coefficients functions of @xmath21 relation between kinematical variables crossing channels holds : @xmath47 odd @xmath40 or-dependence different from even @xmath40-dependence cross one - photon approximation incorrect to approximate interference contribution differential cross section by linear function @xmath49 contradiction with c - invariance hadronic electromagnetic interaction @xmath0 exchange reduced elastic @xmath10 cross section rewritten @xmath50 @xmath51 real function effects @xmath41 interference estimate upper limit @xmath0 contribution differential cross section @xmath52 analyzed four sets data parametrization for @xmath51 : @xmath53 ^2/0.71)^2(1 + q^2^2/m^2)^2 -1.3 -.7 cm figure 1 @xmath54 @xmath55 two - photon contribution @xmath56 @xmath57 proton magnetic moment @xmath58/0^{-2 published data open symbols present results include @xmath0 contribution solid symbols@xmath56 fitting parameter @xmath59 mass of tensor vector meson positive c - parity @xmath60 gev relative role @xmath0 contribution increase with @xmath9 eq . : sfit ] ) simple expression contains symmetry properties of @xmath41 interference specific @xmath1 dependence presence @xmath0 dependence reduced cross section on @xmath1 parametrized function of three parameters @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath56 eqs sfit fig . 1 electric magnetic ffs two photon parameter @xmath56 function of @xmath9 previously published data from traditional rosenbluth fits shown third fitting parameter @xmath56 increases errors on extracted ffs resulting parameter @xmath56 compatible with zero data on @xmath10 elastic scattering deviation from linearity rosenbluth fit presence @xmath0 contribution parametrized according to eq . : sfit ] )deviation from linearity rosenbluth fit methods test @xmath0-exchange in elastic electron hadron scattering comparison cross section scattering unpolarized electrons positrons same kinematical conditions polarization phenomena t - odd polarization observables violation of relations between t - even polarization observables structure functions experimental evidence @xmath0-exchange quantitative estimation important if effect in elastic @xmath10 scattering momentum transfer jlab findings one - photon assumption reanalyzed new complicated formalism advantages electromagnetic probe lost results obtained collaboration discussions with professor m. p. rekalo. rekalo tomasi - gustafsson d. prout . rev . c60 *, 042202 ( 1999 ) alexa 82 * , 1375 ( 1999 ) d abbott 82 *, 1379 ( 1999 ) j. gunion l. stodolsky phys . 30 * , 345 ( franco phys 8 *, 826 ( 1973 ) boitsov kondratyuk kopeliovich 16 * , 237 ( 1973 ) lev 21 * , 45 ( 1973 )rosenbluth phys . rev 79 615 ( 1950 ) akhiezer rekalo dokl ussr 180 1081 ( 1968 ) nucl 4 277 ( 1974 ) p rekalo tomasi - gustafsson lecture notes arxiv nucl - th/0202025 rekalo tomasi - gustafsson eur j. 22 331 ( 2004 ) . 271 ( 2004 ) 742 322 ( 2004 ) walker al . d 49 5671 ( 1994 ) andivahis al phys . 50 5491 ( 1994 ) christy al e94110 collaboration . rev. 70 * 015206 ( 2004 ) qattan al arxiv nucl - ex/0410010
| 0.437052
| 2,823
| 1,453
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,584
|
we present a new discretization for the hadamard fractional derivative , that simplifies the computations .
we then apply the method to solve a fractional differential equation and a fractional variational problem with dependence on the hadamard fractional derivative .
* mathematics subject classification 2010 : * 26a33 , 49m25 , 49m25 .
* keywords : * fractional calculus , discretization methods .
|
similarly to ordinary calculus , we can find in the literature distinct definitions for fractional derivatives and for fractional integrals , which are generalizations of the integer - order derivatives and multiple integrals , respectively .
the most common ones and consequently more studied are the riemann
liouville , caputo and grnwald letnikov definitions .
we deal in this paper with the hadamard fractional derivative , introduced in @xcite .
recently , it has call the attention of researchers and numerous results have appeared , with an extensive study of properties of such kind of operators @xcite . for recent results we suggest @xcite . due the complexity of solving equations involving fractional operators , in most cases is impossible to determine the exact solution and
so numerical methods are used to determine an approximated solution of the problem .
this is an emerging field , and we can find already in the literature several methods to deal with these problems , at least for the most common fractional derivative types . for the hadamard fractional derivative , we mention the recent paper @xcite , where the fractional operator is replaced by a finite sum involving only integer - order derivatives of the function . replacing the fractional derivative by this sum , we rewrite the initial problem in terms of integer - order derivatives and thus we are able to apply classical known methods . in @xcite
another approximation formula is obtained , using also integer - order derivatives only .
the disadvantage is that in order to have a good approximation , we need to use higher - order derivatives , which may not be adequate for fractional problems . in this paper
we follow a different path , by discretizing the fractional derivative , and then convert continuous problems into discrete ones . to start ,
let us recall the definition of the hadamard fractional derivative .
let @xmath0 be two reals with @xmath1 , and @xmath2\to\mathbb{r}$ ] be a function . for @xmath3 , the left hadamard fractional derivative of order @xmath4
is defined by @xmath5 while the right hadamard fractional derivative of order @xmath4 by @xmath6 where @xmath7 denotes the gamma function .
when @xmath8 is an absolutely continuous function , there exists an equivalent definition ( cf .
@xcite ) @xmath9 and @xmath10 more properties can be found in references at the end .
the paper is organized in the following way . in section [ sec:2 ]
we present the main result of the paper . starting with the definition , and with an appropriate grid on time , we present a new discrete version for the left hadamard fractional derivative . to show the efficiency of the method , in section [ sec : example ] we compare the exact expression of a fractional derivative with some numerical experiments , for different values of @xmath4 and different step sizes @xmath11 .
in section [ sec : app ] we appply the technique to solve a fractional differential equation and a fractional calculus of variation problem .
the discretization method is described in the following way . given a function @xmath2\to\mathbb{r}$ ] ,
fix a positive integer @xmath11 , and define the time step @xmath12 given @xmath13 , denote the time and space grid by @xmath14{\left(\frac{b}{a}\right)^n } \quad \mbox{and } \quad x_n = x(t_n).\ ] ] let @xmath2\to\mathbb{r}$ ] be a function of class @xmath15 and @xmath16 .
denote @xmath17 then , for all @xmath18 , @xmath19 where @xmath20 and @xmath21 @xmath22.\\ \end{array}\ ] ] thus , we get the desired approximation formula . now , let us determine an upper bound for the error when we use formula .
the error is given by @xmath23 let @xmath24}\left|x^{(i)}(\tau)\right|\ , , \quad i=1,2.\ ] ] then , using taylor s theorem , we get that , for all @xmath25 and for all @xmath26 $ ] , @xmath27 .
\end{array}\ ] ] therefore , the error is bounded by @xmath28 \,d\tau\\ & = \displaystyle \frac{m_1+\frac32 m_2b}{\gamma(1-\alpha)}\sum_{k=1}^n ( t_k - t_{k-1 } ) \int_{t_{k-1}}^{t_k } \left(\ln\frac{t_n}{\tau}\right)^{-\alpha}\frac{1}{\tau}\ , d\tau . \end{array}\ ] ] having into consideration that , for all @xmath25 and for all @xmath29 , @xmath30 we have that @xmath31 also , since @xmath32 then @xmath33 in conclusion , we obtain the upper bound formula for our approximation : @xmath34 which converges to zero as @xmath35 . in opposite to the classical case , where the concept of derivative is local , a fractional derivative contains memory , and thus to compute the approximation obtained in eq . at a point @xmath36
, we need to know the values of @xmath37 from the beginning until de end - point , i.e. , from @xmath38 to @xmath39 for the right hadamard fractional derivative , we have in a similar way the following approximation formula : @xmath40
let @xmath41 , for @xmath42 $ ] . then ( see @xcite ) @xmath43 in figure [ intexp ] we show the accuracy of the procedure , for different values of @xmath44 and for different values of @xmath45 .
the error of the numerical experiments is measured using the norm @xmath46 we can see that , for a greater value of @xmath11 , the error decreases as expected .
[ ex1 ] consider a fractional differential equation with dependence on the left hadamard fractional derivative : @xmath47\\ x(a)=x_a . \end{array}\right.\
] ] the procedure to solve numerically the system is described next .
fix @xmath16 and for @xmath18 , define @xmath48 replacing the fractional operator by the approximation given in eq .
, we obtain a classical difference equation with @xmath11 unknown points @xmath49 , @xmath50 for example , consider the system @xmath51\\ x(1)=0 .
\end{array}\right.\ ] ] the obvious solution is @xmath52 . applying the discussed method
, we obtain @xmath53 with @xmath54 in figure [ example1 ] we show the numerical results , for different values of @xmath44 and for different values of @xmath55 .
[ ex2 ] for our next application , we show how to solve fractional variational problems with the lagrangian depending on the hadamard fractional derivative .
consider the functional @xmath56 on the set on functions that satisfy the boundary conditions @xmath57 where @xmath58 are two fixed reals .
the procedure how to find a numerical approximation is explained next .
first , divide the interval @xmath59 $ ] into @xmath11 subintervals @xmath60 $ ] for @xmath18 , where @xmath61 denoting @xmath62 , applying the trapezoidal rule and taking into consideration eq .
, the variational integral is approximated as @xmath63 observe that we used here the approximation @xmath64 we can regard this sum as a function of @xmath65 unknown variables @xmath66 , and then to find the optimal solution one needs to solve the system @xmath67 and with this we track the desired values @xmath68 . observe that , in opposite to the classical case , @xmath69 depends on the points @xmath70 .
for example , we want the global minimizer for @xmath71 with the restrictions @xmath72 the optimal solution is @xmath52 since the functional takes only non - negative values and vanishes when evaluated at @xmath73 . in figure [ example2 ]
we show the solution of the problem , for different values of @xmath44 and for different values of @xmath55 .
for all numerical experiments presented above we used matlab to obtain the results . in examples
[ ex1 ] and [ ex2 ] , when we take a small number of mesh points ( @xmath74 ) we get a not so good solution . however , increasing the value of @xmath11 , the error decreases and the numerical solution approaches the analytic solution , converging to it . from the numerical results we also notice that , for the same values of @xmath11 , as @xmath75 increases the error also increases , which makes sense taking into account formula .
we fix all parameters except @xmath75 , it is easy to check that the maximum for error value increases as we increase the value of @xmath75 .
.number of mesh points , @xmath11 , with corresponding error , @xmath76 from formula . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
this work was supported by portuguese funds through the cidma - center for research and development in mathematics and applications , and the portuguese foundation for science and technology ( fct - fundao para a cincia e a tecnologia ) , within project uid / mat/04106/2013 .
a. a. kilbas and a. a. titioura , nonlinear differential equations with marchaud - hadamard - type fractional derivative in the weighted space of summable functions , math . model .
* 12 * ( 2007 ) , no . 3 , 343 - 356 . s. pooseh , r. almeida and d. f. m. torres , expansion formulas in terms of integer - order derivatives for the hadamard fractional integral and derivative , numer . funct .
* 33 * ( 2012 ) , no . 3 , 301319 .
m. d. qassim , k. m. furati and n .- e .
tatar , on a differential equation involving hilfer - hadamard fractional derivative , abstract and applied analysis , vol .
2012 , article i d 391062 , 17 pages , 2012 .
doi:10.1155/2012/391062 d. qian , z. gong and c. li , a generalized gronwall inequality and its application to fractional differential equations with hadamard derivatives , 3rd conference on nonlinear science and complexity ( nsc10 ) , cankaya university , ankara , turkey , 2831 july , 2010 .
|
ordinary calculus literature distinct definitions for fractional derivatives integrals generalizations of integer - order derivatives multiple integrals common studied are riemann liouville caputo grnwald letnikov definitions deal paper with hadamard fractional derivative introduced in @xcite attention researchers results appeared extensive study of properties operators @xcite results suggest @xcite complexity of solving equations fractional operators impossible to determine exact solution numerical methods used approximated solution emerging field literature methods deal problems common fractional derivative types hadamard fractional derivative recent paper @xcite fractional operator replaced by finite sum integer - order derivatives replacing rewrite initial problem in integer - order derivatives apply classical methods in @xcite approximation formula obtained using integer - order derivatives only disadvantage need higher - order derivatives not adequate for fractional problems paper different path discretizing fractional derivative convert continuous problems into discrete ones recall definition of hadamard fractional derivative let @xmath0 be two reals @xmath1 @xmath2 be function @xmath3 left fractional derivative @xmath4 defined by @xmath5 right @xmath4 by @xmath6 @xmath7 denotes gamma function @xmath8 continuous function equivalent definition @xcite ) @xmath9 @xmath10 properties references end paper organized section [ sec:2 ] main result definition grid time new discrete version left hadamard fractional derivative section [ sec : example compare expression fractional derivative numerical experiments different values @xmath4 step sizes @xmath11 section [ sec : app technique solve fractional differential equation fractional calculus of variation problem discretization method function @xmath2\to\mathbb{r}$ fix positive integer @xmath11 define time step @xmath12 @xmath13 denote time space grid by @xmath14 x_n = x(t_n). @xmath2\to\mathbb{r}$ function of class @xmath15 @xmath16 denote @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 desired approximation formula determine upper bound for error formula error given by @xmath23 @xmath24\left|x^{(i)}(\tau)\right i=1,2. using taylor s theorem @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 error bounded by @xmath28\tau\\ \frac{m_1+\frac32 m_2b}\gamma(1-\alpha)}\sum_{k=1}^n ( t_k - t_{k-1 }_{t_{k-1}}^{t_k }\left\frac{t_n}{\tau}\right)^{-\alpha}\frac{1}{\tau} d\tau @xmath25 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 also @xmath32 @xmath33 upper bound formula for approximation : @xmath34 converges to zero as @xmath35 opposite to fractional derivative contains memory compute approximation need to know values of @xmath37 from beginning until @xmath38 to @xmath39 for right fractional derivative approximation formula : @xmath40 let @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 figure accuracy of procedure for different values of @xmath44 and @xmath45error numerical experiments measured using norm @xmath46 greater value @xmath11 error decreases consider fractional differential equation left hadamard fractional derivative @xmath47\\ x(a)=x_a procedure solve numerically system fix @xmath16 @xmath18 define @xmath48 fractional operator approximation eq obtain classical difference equation with @xmath11 unknown points @xmath49 @xmath50 consider system @xmath51\\ x(1)=0 obvious solution @xmath52 obtain @xmath53 with @xmath54 numerical results different values @xmath44 @xmath55 solve fractional variational problems lagrangian depending hadamard fractional derivative consider functional @xmath56 functions boundary conditions @xmath57 @xmath58 two fixed reals procedure find numerical approximation divide interval @xmath59 into @xmath11 subintervals @xmath60 for @xmath18 @xmath61 @xmath62 trapezoidal rule eq .variational integral approximated as @xmath63 used approximation @xmath64 sum as function of @xmath65 unknown variables @xmath66 find optimal solution solve system @xmath67 track desired values @xmath68 @xmath69 depends on points @xmath70 global minimizer for @xmath71 with restrictions @xmath72 optimal solution is @xmath52 functional takes non - negative values vanishes evaluated at @xmath73 figure [ example2 ] solution problem for different values @xmath44 and @xmath55 numerical experiments used matlab results examples small number of mesh points ( @xmath74 ) not good solution increasing value of @xmath11 error decreases numerical solution approaches analytic solution same values of @xmath11 @xmath75 increases error increases fix all parameters except @xmath75 maximum error value increases value @xmath75 .number of mesh points @xmath11 with corresponding error , @xmath76 from formula work supported by portuguese funds cidma - center for research mathematics applications portuguese foundation for science and technology project uid / mat/04106/2013 kilbastitioura nonlinear differential equations marchaud - hadamard fractional derivative summable functions math model 2007 ) 3 343 - 356 pooseh almeida torres expansion formulas integer - order derivatives hadamard fractional integral derivative 33 2012 ) 3 301319 qassim furati tatar differential equation hilfer - hadamard fractional derivative abstract analysis 2012 article 391062 17 pages.1155/2012/391062 qian z gong li generalized gronwall inequality application fractional differential equations hadamard derivatives 3rd conference nonlinear science complexity cankaya university ankara turkey july 2010
| 0.354232
| 2,344
| 1,232
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,593
|
this paper deals with the reconstruction of the direction of a gravitational wave source using the detection made by a network of interferometric detectors , mainly the ligo and virgo detectors .
we suppose that an event has been seen in coincidence using a filter applied on the three detector data streams . using the arrival time ( and its associated error ) of the gravitational signal in each detector ,
the direction of the source in the sky is computed using a @xmath0 minimization technique .
for reasonably large signals ( snr@xmath14.5 in all detectors ) , the mean angular error between the real location and the reconstructed one is about @xmath2 .
we also investigate the effect of the network geometry assuming the same angular response for all interferometric detectors .
it appears that the reconstruction quality is not uniform over the sky and is degraded when the source approaches the plane defined by the three detectors .
adding at least one other detector to the ligo - virgo network reduces the blind regions and in the case of 6 detectors , a precision less than @xmath2 on the source direction can be reached for 99% of the sky .
|
the ligo and virgo gravitational wave interferometric detectors are approaching their design sensitivity @xcite,@xcite and in the near future , coincidences between the three detectors ( ligo - hanford , ligo - livingston and virgo ) will be possible . in order to reconstruct the direction of the astrophysical sources in the sky , it is well known @xcite that a minimum of three detectors is mandatory even if an ambiguity remains between two positions symmetric with respect to the plane defined by the 3 detectors .
the source direction is also provided by the coherent searches for bursts @xcite , @xcite , @xcite or coalescing binaries @xcite , @xcite , @xcite where one of the outputs of the detection algorithm is an estimation of the source direction . in this paper , we propose a method for estimating the source position using only the arrival time of the gravitational signal in each detector .
the event detection is supposed to have been previously done by dedicated algorithms ( [ 10 - 23 ] for bursts , [ 24 - 29 ] for coalescing binaries ) and is not within the scope of this article .
the direction reconstruction is based on a @xmath0 minimization as described in section ii .
this technique can be easily extended to any set of detectors .
moreover , the method can be applied to several types of sources ( burst , coalescence of binary objects ... ) as soon as an arrival time can be defined for the event .
section ii also deals with the simulation procedure which will be used in the following sections to evaluate the reconstruction quality in several configurations .
sections iii and iv describe the performances of the ligo - virgo network first neglecting ( iii ) , then including ( iv ) the angular response of the detectors . in section
v , we consider the addition of other gravitational wave detectors ( supposing a similar sensitivity ) and investigate their impact on the reconstruction . in real conditions , systematic errors on arrival time are likely to exist and their impact on the reconstruction is tackled in section vi .
within a network of _ n _ interferometers , we suppose that each detector @xmath3 measures the arrival time @xmath4 of the gravitational wave .
of course , the definition of the arrival time depends on the source type and is a matter of convention , for example : peak value in the case of a supernova signal , end of the coalescence for binary events . in the following
, it is assumed that all interferometers use consistent conventions .
the error on the arrival time , @xmath5 , depends on the estimator used and on the strength of the signal in the detector @xmath3 , strength ( for a given distance and a given signal type ) which is related to the antenna pattern functions ( see @xcite and references therein ) at time @xmath4 . at that time , the antenna pattern depends on the longitude and the latitude of the detector location , as well as its orientation , the angle between the interferometer arms , the sky coordinates @xmath6 ( right ascension ) and @xmath7 ( declination ) of the source , and the wave polarization angle @xmath8 .
the timing uncertainty @xmath5 can be parametrized by @xcite : @xmath9 where @xmath10 is the measured snr in detector @xmath3 , @xmath11 and @xmath12 are constants depending on the detection algorithm and the signal shape .
for example , a burst search with a 1-ms gaussian correlator leads to @xmath13 ms and @xmath14 .
typically , for an snr equal to 10 , the error on the arrival time is a few tenth of milliseconds and weakly depends on @xmath12 for snr values between 4 and 10 .
the @xmath15 measured arrival times @xmath4 and their associated errors @xmath5 are the input for the reconstruction of the source direction in the sky , direction defined by @xmath6 and @xmath7 . in the 3-detector configuration ,
the angles ( @xmath16 and @xmath17 ) of the source in the detector coordinate system ( see ref.@xcite and @xcite for exact definitions ) are given by @xcite : @xmath18 where d@xmath19 is placed at ( 0,0,0 ) , d@xmath20 at ( @xmath21,0,0 ) and d@xmath22 at ( @xmath23,@xmath24,0 ) .
when performing a coherent analysis of the gw detector streams the position of the source in the sky is part of the output parameters , corresponding to the stream combination which maximizes the snr .
however , for a burst search , it is known that thousands of possible positions have to be tested to obtain the solution @xcite , @xcite or a least - square function involving the integration of detector streams has to be minimized @xcite .
this minimization also implies the test of hundreds of initial conditions in order to reach the right minimum .
concerning coalescing binaries , it implies the definition of a five - parameter bank of filters including the chirp mass , the three euler angles and the inclination angle @xcite of the orbital plane or a three - parameter bank of thousands filters for the two source angles and the chirp time @xcite . in all coherent techniques ,
the extraction of the source direction is an heavy process imbedded in the detection procedure . in this paper
, we propose a simpler approach where @xmath6 and @xmath7 are found through a least - square minimization using separately triggered events obtained by a coincidence search .
we suppose that the detection is already performed applying suitable algorithms ( matched filter for coalescing binaries , robust filters for bursts ) .
the @xmath0 is defined by : @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the arrival time of the gravitational wave at the center of the earth and @xmath27 is the delay between the center of the earth and the i@xmath28 detector which only depends on @xmath6 and @xmath7 .
the first advantage of this definition is that it deals with absolute times recorded by each detector rather than time differences where one detector has to be singled out . otherwise , the best choice for the reference detector is not obvious : the detector with the lower error on the arrival time , the detector which gives the larger time delays or the detector leading the best relative errors on timing differences ?
this definition leads to uncorrelated errors on fitted measurements .
the second advantage is that the network can be extended to any number of detectors and the addition of other detectors is straightforward .
obviously , the method requires that the event is seen by all detectors .
the least - square minimization provides the estimation of @xmath29 and the covariance matrix of the fitted parameters . when the number of detectors is greater than 3 , the @xmath0 value at the minimum can also be used as a discriminating variable , as the system is overconstrained .
a list of coincident events are defined by the three arrival times and their associated errors .
no detection procedure is performed in these simulations as stated before .
the simulation proceeds in two steps in order to study two coupled effects : antenna - patterns and location with respect to the 3-detector plane .
the first step is a simplified approach : the antenna - pattern functions are ignored and the same error @xmath5 is assumed for arrival times .
the second step is more realistic : we assume the same sensitivity for each detector and the signal strength is adjusted to have the mean ( over the three detectors ) snr equal to 10 . however
, this implies that sometimes , due to the antenna - pattern , the signal is seen in a given detector with an snr lower than 4.5 , which remains an acceptable threshold for a real detection . the same threshold equal to 4.5
will be used later to see the effect of a reasonable detection scheme on the angular reconstruction error .
we evaluate the errors @xmath5 for each arrival time @xmath4 using equation [ eq : sigma_t ] with @xmath14 . for a given simulation ,
the coordinates ( @xmath30 ) of the source are chosen and the true arrival times @xmath31 on each detector are computed taken @xmath32 equal to 0 ( it is obvious that the timing origin can always been chosen such as @xmath33 ) the measured arrival times @xmath34 are drawn according to a gaussian distribution centered on @xmath35 and of width @xmath5 .
the simulated values @xmath34 are then used as inputs for the least - square minimization . as the minimization is an iterative procedure , some initial values for the parameters have to be given .
@xmath26 is initialized by the average of @xmath34 . for the angles
, it appears that the initial values for the angles have no influence on the minimization convergence and a random direction is adequate . in the case of three interferometers
, it is well known that there is a twofold ambiguity for the direction in the sky which can lead to the same arrival times in the detectors .
these two solutions are symmetric with respect to the 3-detector plane . in order to resolve the ambiguity ,
a fourth detector is needed . for the evaluation of the reconstruction accuracy ,
only the solution closest to the source is retained .
in this section , we only deal with the ligo - virgo network and the effect of the antenna - pattern functions are not included and it is assumed that all detectors measure the arrival time with the same precision . as previously said , it allows to decouple the effect of the antenna - patterns and of the location with respect to the 3-detector plane .
first of all , as an example , in order to evaluate the accuracy of the reconstruction , we choose a given position in the sky ( coordinates of the galactic center @xmath36 ) and we perform the simulation with @xmath37 s at a fixed time .
the results are shown on figure [ fig : reco_pos ] .
a resolution of about 0.7 degrees can be achieved both on @xmath6 and @xmath7 .
the angular error is defined as the angular distance on the sphere between the true direction and the reconstructed one ( it does not depend on the coordinate system and in particular there is no divergence ( only due to the coordinate system ) when @xmath7 is equal to 90 degrees ) .
this variable will be used in the following steps as the estimator of the reconstruction quality .
the mean angular error is 0.8 degrees . as shown on table [ tab : covar ] , the estimated errors ( given by the covariance matrix ) obtained by the @xmath0 minimization are in perfect agreement with these resolutions .
.reconstruction accuracies on @xmath6 and @xmath7 and errors given by the covariance matrix .
three digits are given in order to show the adequacy between rms and errors given by the covariance matrix . [ cols="^,^,^ " , ]
all angular errors quoted previously suppose that arrival time measurements are only subject to gaussian noise .
systematic biases can also be introduced by the analysis and their effect can be evaluated . in order to do so , we modify equation [ eq : t_measured_bias ] introducing a timing bias for only one detector : @xmath38 as in sections [ source ] and [ including ] , we only consider the ligo - virgo network .
it appears that the widths of the distribution for reconstructed @xmath6 and @xmath7 are not modified by the bias but the central values are shifted from the true ones .
the differences between the reconstructed value and the true one are proportional to the bias and are significantly different from zero when the bias and the statistical error have the same order of magnitude .
table [ tab : bias ] shows the effect of the bias for a given direction ( we check that the effect is independant of the source location ) . in this example , the bias has been applied to the livingstone interferometer .
the width of statistical errors on arrival time was .1 ms leading to a statistical angular error about 0.8@xmath39 .
for the tested configurations , we do not observe significant differences between the three interferometers of the network .
we described a method for the reconstruction of the source direction using the timing information ( arrival time and associated error ) delivered by gravitational wave detectors such as ligo and virgo .
the reconstruction is performed using a least - square minimization which allows to retrieve the angular position of the source and the arrival time at the center of the earth .
the minimization also gives an estimation of errors and correlations on fitted variables .
for a given position , the angular error is proportional to the timing resolution and the systematic errors ( if they exist ) introduce a significant bias on reconstructed angles when they reach the level of the statistical one .
when the antenna - pattern effect is included and imposing a mean snr value of 10 in the ligo - virgo network , a precision of @xmath40 can be reached for half of the sky . in order to reproduce a realistic case
, we apply a threshold on the snr in each detector ( snr@xmath1 4.5 leading to a false alarm rate about @xmath41 hz when performing a threefold coincidence ) .
this condition is satisfied for 60 % of the sky and the median angular error in this case is @xmath42 . as a resolution of @xmath2
is obtained for 30 % of the events satisfying the snr condition , it means that about 20 % of the whole sky is seen with an angular error lower than @xmath2 .
adding other gravitational waves detectors allows to reduce the blind regions and to lower the mean resolution . in the best considered case
( 6 detectors ) , the resolution is about @xmath43 and 99% of the sky is seen with a resolution lower than @xmath44 . all quoted resolutions ( about one degree )
are similar to those delivered by @xmath45-ray satellites when the first grb counterparts have been identified .
so , we can expect it will be also sufficient for the first identification of gravitational wave sources .
|
ligo and virgo gravitational wave detectors approaching design sensitivity coincidences between three detectors hanford livingston virgo possible to reconstruct direction of astrophysical sources sky minimum of three detectors mandatory even if ambiguity between two positions symmetric plane source direction provided by coherent searches for bursts coalescing binaries detection algorithm estimation of source direction propose method for estimating source position using arrival time of gravitational signal in each detector event detection previously done by dedicated algorithms 10 - 23 for bursts 24 - 29 ] for not within scope article direction reconstruction based on @xmath0 minimization in section ii technique can be extended to any detectors method be applied to several types of sources burst coalescence arrival time defined for event section ii deals with simulation procedure evaluate reconstruction quality in configurations sections iii and iv describe performances of ligo - virgo network neglecting including angular response of detectors in section v consider addition of other gravitational wave detectors investigate impact on reconstructionreal conditions systematic errors on arrival time likely exist impact reconstruction tackled in section vi network n interferometers each detector @xmath3 measures arrival time @xmath4 gravitational wave definition arrival time depends source type convention peak value supernova signal end coalescence binary events assumed all interferometers use consistent conventions error on arrival time @xmath5 depends on estimator strength signal detector @xmath3 related to antenna pattern functions @xmath4 antenna pattern depends on longitude latitude detector location orientation angle between interferometer arms sky coordinates wave polarization angle timing uncertainty @xmath5 parametrized by @xcite : @xmath9 @xmath10 measured snr detector @xmath3 @xmath11 @xmath12 constants depending detection algorithm signal shape burst search with 1-ms gaussian correlator leads to @xmath13 ms @xmath14 snr equal to 10 error on arrival time few tenth of milliseconds depends on @xmath12 for snr values between 4 and 10@xmath15 arrival times @xmath4 errors @xmath5 input for source direction defined by @xmath6 @xmath7 3-detector configuration angles @xmath16 @xmath17 of source in detector coordinate system given by @xcite @xmath18 d@xmath19 at ( 0,0,0 )@xmath20 @xmath21,0,0 )@xmath22 @xmath23,@xmath24,0 ) coherent analysis detector streams position source sky output parameters stream combination maximizes snr for burst search thousands of positions tested solution @xcite - function detector streams minimized @xcite minimization implies test of hundreds of initial conditions right minimum coalescing binaries implies five - parameter bank of filters including chirp mass three euler angles inclination angle orbital plane three - parameter bank filters for two source angles chirp time extraction of source direction heavy process detection simpler approach @xmath6 @xmath7 found through least - square minimization using separately triggered events coincidence search detection performed algorithms matched filter for coalescing binaries robust filters for bursts@xmath0 defined by @xmath25 @xmath26 arrival time gravitational wave at center earth @xmath27 delay between center@xmath28 detector depends on @xmath6 and @xmath7 advantage definition deals with absolute times recorded by each detector time differences best choice for reference detector not obvious lower error larger delays leads to uncorrelated errors measurements second advantage network can be extended to detectors addition straightforward method requires event seen by all detectors least - square minimization provides estimation of @xmath29 covariance matrix of fitted parameters detectors greater than 3 @xmath0 value minimum used as discriminating variable system overconstrained coincident events defined by three arrival times errors no detection procedure performed in simulations simulation proceeds in two steps study effects antenna - patterns location 3-detector plane first step antenna - pattern functions ignored same error @xmath5 assumed for arrival times second step same sensitivity for each detector signal strength adjusted mean over three detectors ) snr equal to 10 .implies antenna - pattern signal seen in detector with snr lower than 4.5 acceptable threshold for detection threshold equal to 4.5 used effect detection scheme on angular reconstruction error evaluate errors @xmath5 each arrival time @xmath4 using equation : sigma_t with @xmath14 coordinates @xmath30 of source chosen true arrival times @xmath31 detector computed @xmath32 equal to 0 timing origin chosen @xmath33 measured arrival times @xmath34 drawn gaussian distribution on @xmath35 width @xmath5 simulated values @xmath34 used inputs for least - square minimization minimization iterative initial values for parameters given @xmath26 initialized by average @xmath34 angles initial values no influence on minimization convergence random direction adequate three interferometers twofold ambiguity for direction same arrival times in detectors two solutions symmetric 3-detector plane ambiguity fourth detector needed reconstruction accuracy solution closest to source retained deal with ligo - virgo network effect antenna - pattern functions not included assumed all detectors measure arrival time same precisionpreviously said allows decouple effect antenna - patterns location 3-detector plane to evaluate accuracy reconstruction choose given position sky ( coordinates galactic center @xmath36 ) perform simulation with @xmath37 s fixed time results shown on figure reco_pos resolution 0.7 degrees achieved on @xmath6 and @xmath7 angular error defined as angular distance sphere between true direction reconstructed one depend on coordinate system no divergence due coordinate system when @xmath7 equal to 90 degrees variable used as estimator reconstruction quality mean angular error 0.8 degrees shown on table covar estimated errors covariance matrix obtained by @xmath0 minimization agreement with resolutions.reconstruction accuracies on @xmath6 @xmath7 errors covariance matrix three digits given show adequacy between rms errors covariance matrix angular errors suppose arrival time measurements subject to gaussian noise systematic biases can be introduced analysis effect evaluated modify equation introducing timing bias for one detector : @xmath38 only consider ligo - virgo networkwidths distribution for reconstructed @xmath6 and @xmath7 not modified by bias central values shifted from true differences between reconstructed value true proportional to bias different from zero when bias error same table bias shows effect bias for direction independant of source location bias applied to livingstone interferometer width statistical errors on arrival time .1 ms statistical angular error about 0.8@xmath39 significant differences between three interferometers method for reconstruction source direction using timing information gravitational wave detectors using least - square minimization angular position source arrival time at center earth minimization estimation of errors correlations on variables angular error proportional to timing resolution systematic errors introduce significant bias on reconstructed angles when reach level statistical one antenna - pattern effect included mean snr value 10 in ligo - virgo network precision of @xmath40 reached for half of sky threshold on snr in each detector ( snr@xmath1 4.5 false alarm rate about @xmath41 hz threefold coincidence satisfied for 60 % of sky median angular error is @xmath42 .resolution @xmath2 obtained 30 % events satisfying snr condition 20 % sky seen angular error lower than @xmath2 adding gravitational waves detectors blind regions lower mean resolution best case 6 detectors resolution about @xmath43 99% sky seen resolution lower than @xmath44 quoted resolutions one degree similar @xmath45-ray satellites first grb counterparts identified sufficient first identification gravitational wave sources
| 0.504751
| 2,993
| 1,511
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,600
|
data of pierre auger observatory show a proton - dominated chemical composition of ultrahigh - energy cosmic rays spectrum at ( @xmath0 ) eev and a steadily heavier composition with energy increasing . in order to explain this feature we assume that ( @xmath0 ) eev protons are extragalactic and derive their maximum acceleration energy , @xmath1 eev , compatible with both the spectrum and the composition .
we also assume the rigidity - dependent acceleration mechanism of heavier nuclei , @xmath2 .
the proposed model has rather disappointing consequences : i ) no pion photo - production on cmb photons in extragalactic space and hence ii ) no high - energy cosmogenic neutrino fluxes ; iii ) no gzk - cutoff in the spectrum ; iv ) no correlation with nearby sources due to nuclei deflection in the galactic magnetic fields up to highest energies .
spectra and chemical compositions of ultrahigh - energy ( @xmath3 eev ) cosmic rays ( uhecr ) measured by two largest detectors , high resolution fly s eye ( hires ) @xcite and pierre auger observatory ( pao ) @xcite , are significantly different .
the hires data show pure _ proton _ composition @xcite , confirming such signatures of their propagation through cmbr as the gzk cutoff @xcite and the pair - production dip @xcite . the pao data , on the contrary , strongly favor the nuclei composition getting progressively heavier at @xmath4 eev .
this feature , in terms of energy dependence of eas development maximum in atmosphere , @xmath5 , and r.m.s . of this
observable , rms(@xmath6 ) , is clearly seen in fig .
[ fig3 ]
. the data also suggest that the nucleus charge number @xmath7 changes smoothly in sources . here
we demonstrate that the simple , but disappointing for future experiments , model @xcite can naturally explain both energy spectrum and mass composition observed by the pao .
the basic assumption of the model is the _ proton composition _ of uhecr spectrum at @xmath8 eev , the feature supported both by pao and hires .
two more assumptions are that these protons are _ extragalactic _ and that acceleration of primary nuclei in sources is _ rigidity - dependent _ ,
i.e. that @xmath9 , where @xmath10 is a universal energy to be determined from data ; @xmath7 is a nucleus charge number .
in order to determine the maximum acceleration energy of protons , @xmath11 , let us calculate the extragalactic diffuse proton flux , assuming the power - law generation spectrum @xmath12 with @xmath13 , and normalize it by the pao flux at ( @xmath0 ) eev . varying @xmath14 in the range @xmath15 , the maximum value of @xmath10 allowed by the pao mass composition ( see fig .
[ fig3 ] ) and energy spectrum ( see fig . [ fig4 ] ) may be obtained . in our calculations a homogeneous distribution of sources with no cosmological evolution ( @xmath16 ) was assumed ; the highest redshift of sources @xmath17 . as a criterion of contradiction an excess of calculated proton flux at @xmath18 eev was chosen .
the contradiction has different character for different values of @xmath14 . for steep source generation functions with @xmath19 the shape and flux of the pao spectrum
may be described by @xmath20 ev ; the contradiction occurs only in data on mass composition .
the extreme case , given by @xmath21 , is displayed in the left panel of fig .
[ fig4 ] . for flat generation spectra
( see the extreme case of @xmath22 in the right panel of fig .
[ fig4 ] ) the contradiction is very pronounced . for @xmath23
eev the calculated proton flux exceeds the observed one even at @xmath24 eev .
it is clear that with some redundancy @xmath25 eev for all @xmath26 .
an influence of possible intergalactic magnetic fields on proton spectrum calculated in a diffusive model is shown in the left panel of fig .
[ fig5 ] .
here @xmath27 , which might be the case for acceleration by relativistic shocks . the kolmogorov diffusion in turbulent magnetic field with basic scales
@xmath28 was assumed ( see @xcite ) and distances between sources were @xmath29 mpc .
the analysis of proton maximum energy of acceleration gives again @xmath30 eev , in a rough agreement with the analysis made for homogeneous distribution of sources .
the account for diffusion brings to the flattening of the proton spectrum at @xmath31 eev , seen in fig .
[ fig5 ] as a diffusive cutoff , which provides a transition from the steep galactic spectrum , most probably composed of iron , to the flat spectrum of extragalactic protons .
the basic feature of the pao mass composition , the progressively heavier composition with energy increasing , is guaranteed in our model by the rigidity - dependent maximum energy of acceleration : at energy higher than @xmath32 nuclei with charge @xmath33 disappear , while heavier nuclei with larger @xmath7 survive .
starting from @xmath34 eev , the higher energies are accessible only for nuclei with progressively larger values of @xmath7 .
let us now consider a two - component model , with only protons and iron nuclei being produced in sources with generation index @xmath22 and the maximum acceleration energy @xmath35 eev , shown in the right panel of fig .
[ fig5 ] .
the primary iron nuclei spectrum is calculated as in @xcite for homogeneous distribution of sources .
one may notice that the calculated spectrum of iron describes well the cutoff in the pao spectrum .
this steepening is caused by the photo - disintegration of iron nuclei .
to agree with the mass composition of pao , the iron spectrum in fig .
[ fig5 ] must have a low - energy cutoff at @xmath36 eev .
most naturally it is produced as a diffusive cutoff which appears in models with lattice - located sources due to _ magnetic horizon _ @xcite .
such cutoffs are shown in fig .
[ fig6 ] for three different sets of parameters @xmath37 .
the beginning of this cutoff @xmath38 for iron nuclei is @xmath39 times higher than for protons , i.e. @xmath40 ev , which has a reasonable physical meaning .
the gap between @xmath41 eev and @xmath42 eev is expected to be filled by intermediate nuclei . to provide a smooth rms(@xmath6 ) curve seen in fig .
[ fig3 ] , there are many free parameters , e.g. arbitrary fractions of nuclei accelerated in distant sources . with the proton composition ( the 6th low - energy bin of the pao data in fig .
[ fig3 ] ) .
if this energy increases , @xmath43 increases , too .
the model collapses when the allowed @xmath43 reaches e.g. ( @xmath44 ) eev .
another case is given by the mass composition beinglight nuclei starting right from 1 eev @xcite .
the cosmological evolution of sources are not included in our calculations ; since this effect slightly decreases @xmath45 , it is not needed to be taken into account . in principle , it is also possible that the eev protons detected by pao are secondary ones , i.e. those produced in photo - dissociation of primary nuclei in collisions with cmbr and extragalactic ir / uv photons .
however , in fact , as it was demonstrated in @xcite , the flux of secondary protons in the eev range is always smaller than the sum of primary and secondary nuclei fluxes .
the predictions of our model are very disappointing for the future detectors .
really , the maximum acceleration energy @xmath46 eev for iron nuclei implies the energy per nucleon @xmath47 , well below the gzk cutoff for epochs with @xmath48 .
therefore , practically no cosmogenic neutrinos can be produced in collisions of protons and nuclei with cmb photons .
correlation with uhecr sources also is absent due to deflection of nuclei in the galactic magnetic fields .
the lack of correlation in the model is strengthened by the dependence of the maximum energy on @xmath7 .
the signatures of the disappointing model for the pao detector are the mass - energy relation , already seen in the elongation curve @xmath5 , and transition from galactic to extragalactic cosmic rays below the characteristic energy @xmath49 eev .
there are some uncertainties in the model presented above .
the most important one relates to estimates of @xmath43 .
it is determined by the lowest energy where pao data become inconsistent the work of a. gazizov was supported by a contract with gran sasso center for astroparticle physics ( cfa ) funded by european union and regione abruzzo under the contract p.o .
fse abruzzo 2007 - 2013 , ob .
cro .
|
10 url # 1#1urlprefix[2][]#2
|
10 1
| 0.06483
| 14
| 3
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,608
|
the propagation of intense laser pulses and the generation of high energy electrons from the underdense plasmas are investigated using two dimensional particle - in - cell simulations .
when the ratio of the laser power and a critical power of relativistic self - focusing is the optimal value , it propagates stably and electrons have maximum energies .
|
the interaction of an intense ultrashort laser pulse with underdense plasmas has attracted much interest for a compact accelerator . using intense laser systems ,
of which peak powers exceed 10 tw , electrons with energies greater than 100 mev have been observed in various low density range , of which electron densities are from @xmath0 to @xmath1 @xcite . on the other hand , using terawatt class ti : sapphire laser systems , electrons with energies greater than several mega - electron - volts have been observed from moderately underdense plasmas , of which densities are up to near the quarter - critical density@xcite . at the moderately underdense plasmas ,
the electron energies exceed the maximum energies determined by dephasing length .
it is considered recently that the acceleration occurs by the direct laser acceleration@xcite that includes stochastic or chaotic processes . in this paper , we study the propagation of the laser pulses and the generation of high energy electron in the underdense plasmas using two dimensional particle - in - cell ( 2d pic ) simulations .
the laser power @xmath2 beyond the critical power @xmath3 is necessary because self - focusing is important in a long - distance propagation@xcite . here ,
@xmath4 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 are the electron density and critical density , respectively .
we assume a terawatt class ti : sapphire laser system as a compact laser system in the simulations parameter , because the plasma electron densities @xmath7 .
we use the 2d pic simulation with immobile ions . the peak irradiated intensity , pulse length , and spot size are @xmath8 @xmath9 , @xmath10 fs , and 3.6 @xmath11 m , respectively .
@xmath12 tw , namely the energy is @xmath13 mj , when cylindrical symmetry is assumed , although we use two dimensional cartesian coordinates . the rayleigh length @xmath14 m .
the plasma electron densities @xmath7 , which correspond to @xmath15 , where @xmath16 for the wavelength @xmath17
. these parameters of the simulations are almost the same as the experiments of compact laser system@xcite .
the laser power @xmath12 tw exceeds the critical powers @xmath3 of the relativistic self - focusing for @xmath18 . figures 1(a)-(e ) show the intensities of laser pulses after propagating @xmath19 for electron densities @xmath20 , and @xmath21 , respectively . for @xmath22 and @xmath23 , namely , @xmath24 , the pulses stably propagate without modulation .
electrons with energies greater than 2 mev are hardly observed . for @xmath25@xmath26 , the back of pulse
is modulated .
electrons get energies greater than 20 mev , as shown later . for @xmath27@xmath26 ,
a pulse separates into the bunches of which size about the plasma wavelength .
a pulse breaks up and is not propagate stably any longer , for @xmath28@xmath26 , i.e. @xmath29 . the electron energy spectra for electron densities @xmath30 , and @xmath31 are shown in figs .
2(a)-(c ) , respectively . the maximum energy is greater than @xmath32 mev for @xmath33 .
before the pulses propagate about one and two rayleigh length , the maximum electron energies have been saturated at 20 mev and 10 mev for @xmath22 and @xmath34 , respectively .
we study the propagation of the intense laser pulses and the generation of high energy electrons from the moderately underdense plasmas using 2d pic simulations . for @xmath35 ,
the laser pulse of which power and pulse length are @xmath36 tw and @xmath10 fs stably propagates with modulation . as a result ,
the high energy electrons with energies greater than 20 mev are observed and their energies have not been saturated , namely , electrons can gain higher energies propagating with the intense laser pulse through long size plasmas . for @xmath37 , although the pulses stably propagate , no high energy electron is observed . on the other hand , for @xmath38 , high energy electrons with energies up to 20 mev are observed , although pulses does not propagate stably .
the simulation results of the dependence to the plasma density of the maximum electron energy explain the latest experiment well qualitatively@xcite .
in the simulations , the maximum propagation distance is @xmath39 is limited by the performance of the computer and simulation code .
since the pulse has propagated sufficiently stably to @xmath19 for the plasma densities less than @xmath40@xmath26 , simulations with a longer propagation distance is required .
99 z. najmudin _ et al . _ , phys .
plasmas , * 10 * ( 2003 ) 2071 y. kitagawa _
et al . _ ,
* 92 * ( 2004 ) 205002 . c. gahn
_ et al . _ ,
* 83 * ( 1999 ) 4772 .
et al . _ ,
soc . , * 48 * ( 2003 ) 195 ; k. koyama _
_ , int . j. appl .
, * 14 * ( 2001/2002 ) 263 ; m. adachi _ et al . _ , proceedings of the 31st
eps conference on plasma phys .
london , 28 june - 2 july 2004 eca vol.28 g , p-5.024 ( 2004 ) m. tanimoto _
e , * 68 * ( 2003 ) 026401 ; t. nakamura _
_ , phys . plasmas , * 9 * ( 2002 ) 1801 ; z .- m . sheng _
et al . _ ,
lett . , * 88 * ( 2002 ) 055004 ; j. meyer - ter - vehn and z. m. sheng , phys .
plasmas , * 6 * ( 1999 ) 641 ; a. pukov _
et al . _ ,
plasmas , * 6 * ( 1999 ) 2847 .
g. schmidt and w. horton , comments plasma phys . controlled fusion * 9 * , 85 ( 1985 ) ; p. sprangle _ et al .
_ , ieee trans . plasma sci . *
ps-15 * ( 1987 ) 1987 ; g .- z .
et al . _ ,
fluids * 309 * ( 1987 ) 526 .
|
interaction intense ultrashort laser pulse underdense plasmas interest compact accelerator intense laser systems peak powers 10 tw electrons energies 100 mev observed in low density range electron densities @xmath0 to @xmath1 terawatt class ti sapphire laser systems electrons energies mega - electron - volts observed moderately underdense plasmas densities quarter - critical density underdense plasmas electron energies exceed maximum energies dephasing length acceleration direct laser acceleration stochastic processes study propagation laser pulses generation high energy electron in underdense plasmas simulations laser power @xmath2 beyond critical power @xmath3 necessary self - focusing long - distance propagation @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 electron density critical density terawatt class ti : sapphire laser system as compact plasma electron densities 2d pic simulation with immobile ions peak irradiated intensity pulse length spot size @xmath8 @xmath9 fs 3.6 @xmath11 m energy @xmath13 mj cylindrical symmetry rayleigh length @xmath14 mplasma electron densities @xmath7 @xmath15 @xmath16 wavelength @xmath17 parameters simulations same experiments compact laser system@xcite laser power @xmath12 tw exceeds critical powers @xmath3 self - focusing @xmath18 figures 1(a-(e show intensities laser pulses @xmath19 electron densities @xmath20 @xmath22 pulses propagate without modulation electrons energies greater than 2 mev observed @xmath25@xmath26 pulse modulated electrons energies greater than 20 mev @xmath27 pulse separates bunches plasma wavelength breaks up @xmath28 @xmath29 electron energy spectra densities @xmath30 @xmath31 figs 2(a)-(c maximum energy greater than mev @xmath33 maximum electron energies saturated 20 mev 10 mev @xmath22 @xmath34 study propagation intense laser pulses generation high energy electrons underdense plasmas 2d pic simulations @xmath35 laser pulse power length @xmath36 tw fs propagates with modulationhigh energy electrons than 20 mev observed not saturated gain higher energies laser pulse through plasmas @xmath37 no high energy electron observed @xmath38 high energy electrons up to 20 mev observed propagate stably simulation results plasma density maximum electron energy explain experiment maximum propagation distance @xmath39 limited by computer simulation code pulse propagated to @xmath19 plasma densities less than simulations longer propagation distance required najmudin et al . phys . plasmas 10 * ( 2003 ) 2071 kitagawa 92 * ( 2004 ) 205002 gahn 83 * ( 1999 ) 4772 48 2003 ) 195 koyama j appl . 14 2001/2002 ) 263 adachi proceedings 31st eps conference plasma phys . london 28 june - 2 july 2004 vol.28 g p-5.024 ( 2004 ) tanimoto 68 * ( 2003 ) 026401 nakamura phys . plasmas 9 ( 2002 ) 1801 sheng et al . 88 * ( 2002 ) 055004 meyer - ter - vehnsheng phys plasmas 6 1999 ) 641 pukov et al plasmas 6 1999 ) 2847 schmidt horton comments plasma phys controlled fusion 9 85 ( 1985 ) sprangle al plasma sci ps-15 1987 ) z al fluids 309 * ( 1987 ) 526
| 0.261918
| 1,447
| 750
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,609
|
the method of numerical symmetrization of state of identical particles proposed by us before is clarified and discussed .
|
it is well known experimental fact that identical pions , which are produced in heavy ion collisions , being bosons show bose - einstein correlations .
these correlations result from the quantum mechanical interference in the corresponding symmetrized @xmath0-particle wave function ( where @xmath0 denotes the number of produced identical pions ) .
they contain large amount of information about the statistical properties of the momentum and configuration space distribution of the system , and thus provide a potentially very useful method to probe the geometry of the hadronizing source ( see , for example , @xcite and references therein ) . according to common understanding we are not able to determine which pion is emitted from which position in the source , so we are required by bose statistics to add amplitudes for all possible alternate histories . in general , symmetrized wave function for @xmath1-pion state can be written in the following way @xcite : @xmath2 , \label{eq : nwave}\ ] ] where @xmath3 denotes the @xmath4 element of a permutation of the sequence @xmath5 and the sum over @xmath6 denotes therefore the sum over all @xmath7 permutations in this sequence ( dependence on positions of points of detection , which will vanish when calculating probabilities ,
was neglected ) . here
s denote the points of production of secondaries . because in the experiment one observes only momenta of produced secondaries these @xmath8 s
must be somehow get rid of .
this is so far always done by integrating over @xmath9 with some _ assumed _ distribution @xmath10 , which is _ assumed _ to be factorizable and expressed by product of independent single particle distributions @xmath11 @xcite . as result one gets the following probability of the @xmath1-pion state , @xmath12 expressed by _
permanent _ of the matrix @xmath13 , where @xmath14 for usually considered @xmath15 case one recovers well known classical expression for the probability of detecting two pions in the final state @xcite : @xmath16 unfortunately the execution time of direct computation of the permanent , eq.([eq : nwave ] ) , grows exponentially with @xmath1 one has to devise some special methods like _ metropolis procedure _ investigated in @xcite or _
von neumann accepting - rejection method _ proposed in @xcite .
the _ metropolis procedure _ proposed in @xcite uses the standard monte carlo technique due to metropolis .
this is general method which allows to generate ensemble of @xmath0-body configurations according to some prescribed probability density .
that is , the probability of a given configuration in the ensemble is precisely that given by the probability density used to generate `` successive '' configurations . in @xcite this technique
was used to modify directions of momentum vectors of number of selected particles from a system of @xmath0 identical particles in order to impose the @xmath0-particle distributions derived from be correlation functions .
this procedure is then repeated many times , changing selected particles , until a kind of `` equilibrium '' is achieved .
as shown in @xcite one was able in this way to generate typical multipion events which explicitly exhibit all correlations induced by bose statistics .
as a result of application of this algorithm a number of objects ( called _ speckles _ ) being clusters of large number of identical pions in the phase - space is being formed .
the drawback of this method is that symmetrization of clusters with sizes ( represented by the number of particles inside cluster , @xmath17 ) larger than @xmath18 takes prohibitively long time . in @xcite
this method was therefore modified by limiting symmetrization only to particles in clusters .
this was possible by using wave packets to describe produced particles instead of plane waves used in @xcite allowing therefore for localization of particles within certain phase - space volume and for providing the suitable criterium for defining a cluster .
the _ accepting - rejection method _ investigated in @xcite is based on the well known `` hit - or - miss '' technique of generating a set of random numbers according to a prescribed distribution .
the method was designed to model collapse of a multiparticle wave function into a properly symmetrized state , as required by bose quantum statistics .
in contrast to the previous one it is sequential because @xmath0 multiparticle event is constructed by first choosing single particle in phase space , then adding to it the second one according to the assumed @xmath19-particle correlation function @xmath20 , then adding @xmath21 particle according to @xmath22 and so on . it is easy to realize that in this way one gets in the allowed phase space a `` cell - like '' structure because regions with some particles inside them already present will have bigger chance to attract new particle . in a sense it looks
like follows : first particle forms a seed for a first cell .
when second particle is added to event it can , depending on its distance from the first one , either remain in that cell or later on attract new particles and in this way start to form a new cell .
this will then continue until all particles are used .
unfortunately , this sequential procedure is even more time consuming than the previous one .
the above discussion shows that complexity of numerical symmetrization of wave function for all identical pions produced in a given event ( cf .
, eq.([eq : nwave ] ) ) can be substantially reduced if only one can justify the idea that such symmetrization should be applied to groups of limited number of particles , as proposed in @xcite . as argued there
this can be achieved by dividing , according to some prescribed procedure , the initial set of secondaries into clusters consisting of identical particles with similar momenta .
such groups of particles , but this time of ( almost ) equal energies , were introduced in @xcite under the name _ elementary emitting cells _ ( eec s ) .
the physical justification was that bosonic particles , because of their statistical properties , tend to occur , as much as possible , in _ the same _ state .
one should realize now that such decomposition corresponds to _ factorization _ of permanent given by eq.([eq : permanent ] ) into matrix with a block structure : @xmath23 this idea of eec was exploited by us further in @xcite where instead of symmetrization of multiparticle wave function ( depending on space - time positions , @xmath24 , and energy - momenta , @xmath25 ) we worked in the number of particles basis .
the bosonic character of the produced secondaries means in this case the specific bunching of identical particles in the phase space .
in fact it is nothing else but modelling the correlations of fluctuations due to quantum statistics present in the system , which for @xmath19-particle case are represented by : @xmath26 @xmath27 is dispersion of the multiplicity distribution @xmath28 and @xmath29 is the correlation coefficient depending on the type of particles produced : @xmath30 for bosons , fermions and boltzmann statistics , respectively ) .
the important feature of the eec method is that number of particles in each cell follows by definition the geometrical ( or bose - einstein ) distribution characterized for identical bosonic particles .
it should be mentioned at this point that the importance of bunching of particles in modelling quantum statistical effects has been demonstrated already in @xcite . in this paper , following ideas of information theory , authors constructed monte - carlo ( mc ) event generator for multiparticle production processes ( and applied it to @xmath31 reactions ) .
the main point was the assumption that particles of the same charge are located in cells ( in their case they were constructed in rapidity space and were of equal size ) .
it turned out that such division of phase space into cells was crucial for obtaining the characteristic form of the @xmath19-body bec correlation function @xmath32 ( i.e. , the one peaked and greater than unity at @xmath33 and then decreasing in a characteristic way towards @xmath34 for large values of @xmath35 , out of which one usually deduces the spatio - temporal characteristics of the hadronization source @xcite ) . in our case we argue that the method of production of eec proposed in @xcite can be used to _ define _ the structure of clusters obtained in @xcite ( with , as it turns out , about @xmath36 particles per cluster on average , depending on circumstances @xcite ) .
therefore , instead of symmetrizing all particles in a given event , one symmetrizes separately particles in a number of eec s with @xmath37 . in the plane wave approximation used in @xcite ,
one has therefore for some typical eec the following @xmath38-particle probability function : @xmath39}=1+\frac{2}{n_{cl}!}\sum_{\sigma'>\sigma=1}^{n_{cl } ! } \cos\left\{\sum_{j=1}^{n_{cl}}p_i\left[r_{\sigma(j)}-r_{\sigma'(j)}\right]\right\ }
. \label{full}\ ] ] notice that eq .
( [ full ] ) still contains ( unmeasurable ) positions of production of particles , @xmath40 . therefore they will be later eliminated by selecting them from some _ assumed _ distribution in a kind of numerical integration process .
it corresponds to analytical integrations encountered before but in our approach we do not limit in any way the form of density function used ( it had to be _
factorizable _ before ) .
it should be stressed that when all particles in the cluster are exactly in the same state then one gets , as expected , @xmath39}\left({\rm max}\right)\left|_{p_1=\cdots = p_{n_{cl } } } \right.= n_{cl } ! .\label{max}\ ] ] however , in practice , even now from time to time one encounters eec with @xmath41 , in which case eq.([full ] ) is still very time consuming . for such cases we have to use some approximate schemes .
the first one is sequential ( cf .
[ fig2 ] ) : one starts with some single particle in eec and adds new particles one by one to all others already present and correlate them by using standard @xmath19-particle probability : @xmath42 . the resulting probability to get @xmath38-particle state is given by : @xmath43}=\mathcal{p}_{1, ...
,n_{cl}-1}\cdot \prod_{j=1}^{n_{cl}-1}\left[1+\cos\left(\delta r_{jn_{cl}}\cdot\delta p_{jn_{cl}}\right)\right ] .\label{sequential}\ ] ] ) .,width=302 ] modelled for single eec with @xmath44 by using @xmath19-particles ( sequential ) correlations as given by eq .
( [ sequential ] ) ( circles ) and full @xmath45-particles correlations as given by eq .
( [ full ] ) ( stars ) .
for comparison , the analytical result , @xmath46 , obtained for uniform one dimensional source in space with @xmath47 fm is also shown ( dotted - dashed line).,width=283 ] modelled by using mc event generators with eecs ( circles ) and without eecs but with particles selected directly from the corresponding bose - einstein distribution @xcite . in both cases as reference event the boltzmann distribution was used.,width=283 ] although appealing ( in fact it resembles procedure used in @xcite ) it has drawback that when all particles are in the same state then @xmath43}\left({\rm max } \right)\left|_{p_1=\cdots = p_{n_{cl } } } \right .
= 2^{\frac{1}{2}n_{cl}(n_{cl}-1)}\ ] ] i.e. , for @xmath48 the correlations are stronger and the maximal value of probability function gets bigger than allowed limit defined by eq.([max ] ) .
both , exact ( [ full ] ) and sequential ( [ sequential ] ) methods are compared in fig .
[ fig1 ] . approximation ( [ sequential ] ) keeps the width of @xmath49 the same , however it differs substantially in @xmath50 ( from which one tends to estimate the so called _ chaoticity _ of the hadronizing source @xcite ) .
the other possible approximation , which was used in our hitherto applications @xcite , is that all particles in a given eec are correlated only with the first particle defining this cell , not between themselves .
it is interesting to notice that the results for @xmath49 obtained this way are almost the same as those obtained by using the full method , eq .
( [ full ] ) , but differ from that of eq .
( [ sequential ] ) .
we close this section by noticing recent attempt to imitate the bosonic nature of particles produced by mc event generator , in which they were choosen directly according to bose - einstein distribution @xcite .
this method seems to be very natural and occurred to be also very fast .
however , as one can see from fig .
[ fig3 ] , where it is compared with our approach , it leads to completely different @xmath49 substantially underestimating the correlation function @xmath49 .
we claim therefore that such procedure inevitably loses some piece of important information , namely the fact that eec s are formed and that bose - einstein distributions are only for particles in such eec s , not in the whole event .
in fact , signal of possible bose - einstein correlations without cells is seen in fig .
[ fig3 ] are the trivial correlations , which can be eliminated by the proper choice of the reference event .
we would like to summarize by stressing that there is _ no way _ to add to any of the existing mc event generators effects of quantum statistics , in particular bose - einstein one ( be ) .
this is because they are all build on basis of classical physics with both the space - time and energy - momentum characteristics of produced secondaries used simultaneously .
the only way out advocated here ( albeit , most probably , not very practical one and therefore hardly to be followed ) is to build the multiparticle mc event generator _
ab initio _ , with be properties ( like bunching in phase space ) being one of its basic principles and consisting its first step .
all other features of such generator would have to be added only after this .
so far there is only one working example of this type @xcite , our efforts @xcite aim for its further generalization and will be continued .
ou is grateful for support and for the warm hospitality extended to him by organizers of the ismd2006
. partial support of the ministry of science and higher education ( grants nr 621/e-78/spb / cern / p-03/dwm 52/2004 - 2006 and 1 p03b 022 30 ) is acknowledged ( ou and gw ) .
o.v.utyuzh , g.wilk and z.wodarczyk , hep - ph/0503046 , acta phys . hung . * a * - heavy ion phys.*25 * ( 1 ) ( 2006 ) 83 ; hep - ph/0509320 , aip conf .
* 828 * ( 2006 ) 75 ; hep - ph/0509342 , to be published in nukleonika * 51 * ( supplement 3 ) ( 2006 ) .
|
known identical pions produced in heavy ion collisions show bose - einstein correlations correlations result from quantum mechanical interference in symmetrized @xmath0-particle wave function @xmath0 denotes number produced identical pions contain information about statistical properties momentum configuration space distribution system useful method probe geometry hadronizing source @xcite determine which pion emitted from position source required bose statistics add amplitudes for alternate histories symmetrized wave function for @xmath1-pion state written @xcite : @xmath2 nwave @xmath3 denotes @xmath4 element permutation sequence @xmath5 sum over @xmath6 denotes all @xmath7 permutations on positions points of detection probabilities neglected denote points of production of secondaries momenta produced secondaries @xmath8 s rid integrating over @xmath9 with assumed distribution @xmath10 factorizable expressed product independent single particle distributions @xmath11 @xcite probability of @xmath1-pion state, @xmath12 expressed by _ permanent _ matrix @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 case recovers classical expression for probability detecting two pions in final state @xcite : @xmath16 execution time of direct computation of permanent eq.( : nwave grows with @xmath1 special methods like _ metropolis procedure or von neumann accepting - rejection method metropolis procedure uses standard monte carlo technique general method @xmath0-body configurations according prescribed probability density probability configuration by probability density configurations @xcite technique used modify directions momentum vectors of selected particles from @xmath0 identical particles impose @xmath0-particle distributions from correlation functions procedure repeated many times changing particles until equilibrium achieved generate typical multipion events correlations induced by bose statistics algorithm objects _ speckles _ clusters of large identical pions in phase - space formed drawback symmetrization of clusters with sizes larger than @xmath18 takes long time @xcite method modified symmetrization to particles in clusters possible using wave packets describe particles instead of plane waves in @xcite allowing localization particles within phase - space volume criterium for defining cluster accepting - rejection method in @xcite based on hit - or - miss '' technique generating random numbers according to prescribed distribution method designed model collapse multiparticle wave function into symmetrized state required by bose quantum statistics contrast sequential @xmath0 multiparticle event constructed by choosing single particle in phase adding second according to @xmath19-particle correlation function adding @xmath21 particle according to @xmath22 gets phase space cell - like '' structure regions with particles present attract new particle first particle forms seed for first cell second particle added can remain in cell or attract new particles form new cell until all particles used sequential procedure time consuming than complexity of numerical symmetrization of wave function for all identical pions in event can be reduced if idea symmetrization applied to groups limited number of particles as proposed in @xcite achieved by dividing initial set secondaries into clusters identical particles with similar momentagroups of particles almost equal energies introduced in @xcite _ elementary emitting cells _ ( eec s ) justification was bosonic particles occur in same state decomposition corresponds to factorization of permanent into matrix with block structure : @xmath23 idea eec exploited in @xcite symmetrization of multiparticle wave function worked in number of particles basis bosonic character of secondaries means specific bunching of identical particles in phase space modelling correlations of fluctuations due to quantum statistics represented by @xmath26 @xmath27 dispersion of multiplicity distribution @xmath28 @xmath29 correlation coefficient on type of particles produced @xmath30 for bosons boltzmann statistics eec method number of particles in each cell follows geometrical distribution for identical bosonic particles importance of bunching of particles in modelling quantum statistical effects demonstrated in @xcite authors constructed monte - carlo ( mc ) event generator for multiparticle production processes applied to @xmath31 reactions assumption particles of same charge located in cells constructed in rapidity space equal size )division of phase space into cells crucial for characteristic form @xmath19-body bec correlation function @xmath32 peaked than unity at @xmath33 towards @xmath34 for large values of @xmath35 deduces spatio - temporal characteristics of hadronization source @xcite method of production of eec in @xcite define structure of clusters about @xmath36 particles per cluster average depending on circumstances instead of symmetrizing all particles in event symmetrizes separately particles in eec s with @xmath37 plane wave approximation in @xcite for typical eec @xmath38-particle probability function : @xmath39}=1+\frac{2}{n_{cl}}\sum_{\sigma'>\sigma=1}^{n_{cl\left\sum_{j=1}^{n__\sigma(j_\sigma' eq . contains unmeasurable positions of production of particles @xmath40 later eliminated by selecting from assumed distribution in numerical integration process corresponds to integrations limit density function usedstressed all particles cluster same state gets @xmath39}\left({\rm max}\right){p_1=\cdots = p_{n_{cl } \right.= n_{cl }{max} practice encounters eec with @xmath41 eq.([full time consuming approximate schemes first sequential starts single particle adds new particles standard @xmath19-particle probability @xmath42 resulting probability @xmath38-particle state given by @xmath43}=\mathcal{p}_{1, ... ,n_{cl}-1}\cdot \prod_{j=1}^{n_{cl}-1}\left[1+\cos\left(\delta r_{jn_{cl}}\cdot\delta p_{jn_{cl}}\right){sequential},width=302 modelled single eec with @xmath44 @xmath19-particles sequential correlations full @xmath45-particles correlations analytical result @xmath46 uniform one dimensional source space with @xmath47 fm shown dotted - dashed line).,width=283 modelled mc event generators with eecs circles without eecs particles selected from bose - einstein distribution @xcite both cases reference boltzmann distribution used.,width=283 appealing resembles procedure @xcite drawback all particles same state @xmath43}\left({\rm max } \right)\left|_{p_1=\cdots = p_{n_{cl } } \right . = 2^{\frac{1}{2}n_{cl}(n_{cl}-1)}\ @xmath48 correlations stronger maximal value probability function bigger than limit defined by eq.([max ] ) both exact sequential methods compared in fig . [ fig1 ] approximation sequential keeps width @xmath49 same differs in @xmath50 estimate chaoticity hadronizing source @xcite other approximation used @xcite all particles given eec correlated only with first particle defining cell not between themselves results for @xmath49 almost same as full method differ from eq . [ sequential ] ) noticing recent attempt to imitate bosonic nature of particles mc event generator choosen according to bose - einstein distribution @xcite method seems natural fast approach leads to different @xmath49 underestimating correlation function @xmath49claim procedure loses important information eec s formed bose - einstein distributions for particles not whole event signal possible bose - einstein correlations without cells seen in fig . trivial correlations eliminated by proper choice reference event no way to add existing mc event generators effects quantum statistics bose - einstein one be build on classical physics space - time energy - momentum characteristics only way out advocated build multiparticle mc event generator ab initio be properties bunching phase space basic first step other features added after one working example @xcite efforts aim for further generalization continued grateful for support hospitality organizers ismd2006 partial support ministry of science and higher education ( grants nr 621/e-78/spb / cern / p-03/dwm 52/2004 - 2006 1 p03b 022 30 ) acknowledged o.v.utyuzh g.wilk z.wodarczyk , hep - ph/0503046 , acta phys . hung heavy ion phys.*25 * ( 1 2006 ) 83 ; hep - ph/0509320 aip conf .828 2006 75 hep - ph/0509342 published nukleonika 51 supplement 3 2006
| 0.575501
| 3,332
| 1,763
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,625
|
we present component - resolved and total pair distribution functions for a 2deg with two symmetric valleys .
our results are based on quantum monte carlo simulations performed at several densities and spin polarizations .
|
a two - valley ( 2v ) two - dimensional ( 2d ) electron gas ( eg ) is the simplest model to describe electrons confined in solid state devices such as si - mosfets @xcite and certain quantum wells @xcite . in this 2d model , electrons interact via a @xmath0 potential in a uniform neutralizing background and possess an additional discrete degree of freedom ( the valley index ) .
one may identify electrons with given spin projection and valley index as belonging to a different species or _
we focus on the case of two symmetric valleys , where the number of up ( down ) spin electrons is the same for both valleys . in this case at zero temperature the 2deg is completely characterized in terms of the coupling parameter @xmath1 and the spin polarization @xmath2 ( where @xmath3 is the total electron density , @xmath4 the bohr radius , @xmath5 the density of up ( down ) spin electrons ) .
the interest in the properties of the 2deg has been strongly revived in the last years due to the experimental discovery of a previously unexpected metal - insulator transition @xcite in which the valley degree of freedom appears to play an important role @xcite .
the transition takes place at low density , where an accurate treatment of electron correlation is crucial . in this respect ,
quantum monte carlo ( qmc ) simulations have provided over the years the method of choice for microscopic studies @xcite of the 2deg .
we have recently provided an analytic expression of the correlation energy of the 2v2deg @xcite . here , we focus on the pair distribution functions ( pdfs ) , which are strictly related to the description of exchange and correlation properties of the system ( see _ e.g. _ ref .
@xcite ) . as pointed out in ref .
@xcite , pdfs may serve a variety of purposes , among which the estimate of finite thickness effects on the 2deg spin susceptibility @xcite , applications in dft calculations , or a test of the accuracy of hypernetted - chain calculations @xcite .
the pdf is related to the probability of finding two electrons at positions @xmath6 and @xmath7 respectively .
the _ component - resolved _ pdf @xmath8 of a multicomponent 2deg is defined as @xcite @xmath9 with @xmath10 , @xmath11 denoting creation and annihilation field operators , @xmath12 the expectation value on the ground state and @xmath13 the electron density of the component @xmath14 .
the normalization is such that @xmath15 , in case there is neither exchange nor correlation . in a homogeneous and isotropic system
, @xmath16 depends only on the relative distance @xmath17 and there is symmetry for index permutations ( @xmath18 ) .
if @xmath19 is the concentration of the component @xmath14 , the total ( _ component - summed _ ) pdf @xmath20 reads @xmath21 in the 2v2deg , @xmath22 is a composite index which denotes the spin and valley ( respectively @xmath23 and @xmath24 ) degrees of freedom and spans the four cases @xmath25 . in general , for 2v there are ten different @xmath16 , but in the case of two symmetric valleys the number of different @xmath16 is two for @xmath26 and five for @xmath27 ( see also ref .
@xcite ) . in the following
we shall denote the different @xmath16 with one of the possible different labels ( _ e.g. _ for @xmath27 @xmath28 ) .
most of the simulation details are the same as in ref .
we performed fixed - phase dmc simulations ( for a review of qmc techniques see _ e.g. _ ref @xcite ) for @xmath29 and @xmath30 . to reduce the finite size effects , we used twist - averaged boundary conditions ( tabc ) @xcite , which also allow to change @xmath31 by flipping any number of spins at fixed number of electrons @xmath32 . to sample the pdfs we performed simulations for a system of @xmath33 electrons .
time steps were chosen at the different @xmath34 to give an acceptance rate corresponding to @xmath35 .
we did simulations with 320 walkers .
the twist grid is the same as in ref .
@xcite . as in ref .
@xcite , we used a slater - jastrow trial wave function @xmath36 , but , here , we considered only plane - wave nodes , since the more accurate backflow ( bf ) nodes yield only slight modifications to the pdfs @xcite .
besides , bf effects on the energy were shown to be bigger in the two - component case than in the four - component system @xcite .
dmc provides the mixed estimate of an operator @xmath37 , _ i.e. _ @xmath38 ( with @xmath39 denoting the ground state of the system ) .
if @xmath37 commutes with the hamiltonian @xmath40 , @xmath41 coincides with the expectation value on the true ground state @xmath39 .
if @xmath37 does not commute with @xmath40 ( as in the case here considered ) , it is better to compute the extrapolated estimate @xmath42 ( where @xmath43 is the variational mc expectation value on @xmath36 ) which is accurate to second order in the difference @xmath44 between @xmath39 and @xmath36 .
and @xmath45 .
solid lines represent the total @xmath20 . ] .
see labels . ] in fig .
[ 2vspinresolved - z01]-[2vspinresolved - zno01 ] we show representative examples of 2v component - resolved pdfs for @xmath26 and finite @xmath31 respectively .
all lenghts are given in units of @xmath46 .
the component - resolved pdfs shown in fig .
[ 2vspinresolved - z01 ] illustrate the tendency to a local order which favors electrons belonging to different species ( as e.g. @xmath47 and @xmath48 ) to get closer than electrons belonging to the same species . for intermediate spin polarizations
( see fig .
[ 2vspinresolved - zno01 ] ) the component - resolved pdfs exhibit a richer structure than the @xmath26 cases , with qualitative features clearly related to the interplay of exchange and correlations ( for example , in the density range considered the diagonal pdf of the minority component in a strongly polarized system is found to be determined by exchange alone , to a very good approximation ) .
the significant spin - polarization dependence seen in the component - resolved pdfs almost disappears in the total pdfs , particularly at large @xmath34 .
this can be appreciated in fig .
[ 2vspinsummed ] ( left panel ) , which shows the total pdfs for a high density ( @xmath49 ) and a low density ( @xmath50 ) case with zero and full spin polarization .
the dependence of the total pdf on @xmath34 is depicted in fig . [ 2vspinsummed ] for @xmath51 .
we see that even for @xmath34 as small as 1 the effect of exchange on the total pdf , which is expected to decrease with the number @xmath52 of ( equally populated ) components , is already very small for @xmath53 . and
right panel : @xmath54 and @xmath51 ( increasing peaks for increasing @xmath34 ) .
all lengths are in units of @xmath46 . ]
full tabulations of the calculated pdfs are available upon request from the first author .
20 ando t , fowler a b and stern f 1982 _ rev .
phys . _ * 54 * 437 shkolnikov y p , vakili k , de poortere e p and shayegan m 2004 * 92 * 246804 kravchenko s v and sarachik m p 2004 _ rep .
phys . _ * 67 * 1 ( and references therein ) anissimova s , kravchenko s v , punnoose a , finkelstein a m and klapwijk t m 2007 _ nature phys . _
* 3 * 707 punnoose a and finkelstein a m 2005 _ science _ * 310 * 289 gunawan o , gokmen t , vakili k , padmanabhan m , de poortere e p and shayegan m 2007 _ nat .
phys . _ * 3 * 388 tanatar b and ceperley d m 1989 _ phys .
_ b * 39 * 5005 kwon y , ceperley d m and martin r m 1993 _ phys .
b _ * 48 * 12037 rapisarda f and senatore g 1996 _ aust .
j. phys . _
* 49 * 16 conti s and senatore g 1996 _ europhys .
* 36 * ( 9 ) 695 varsano d , moroni s and senatore g 2001 _ europhys .
* 53 * 348 attaccalite c , gori - giorgi p , moroni s and bachelet g b 2002 _ phys . rev .
lett . _ * 88 * 256601 gori - giorgi p , moroni s and bachelet g b 2004 b * 70 * 115102 marchi m , de palo s , moroni s and senatore g 2008 the correlation energy and the spin susceptibility of the two - valley two - dimensional electron gas _ preprint _ cond - mat/0808.2569 giuliani g and vignale g 2005 _ quantum theory of the electron liquid _
( cambridge : cambridge university press ) 35 and appendix a.4 de palo s , botti m , moroni s and senatore g 2005 _ phys . rev .
lett . _ * 94 * 226405 ( 2005 ) dharma - wardana m w c and perrot f 2004 _ phys .
_ b * 70 * 35308 foulkes m , mitas l , needs r j and rajagopal g 2001 _ rev .
* 73 * 33 lin c , zong f h and ceperley d m 2001 _ phys .
_ e * 64 * 016702
|
two - valley dimensional electron gas simplest model electrons in solid state devices si - mosfets quantum wells electrons interact via @xmath0 potential in uniform neutralizing background possess additional discrete degree freedom valley index identify electrons with spin projection valley index different species focus on two symmetric valleys number spin electrons same for both at zero temperature 2deg characterized coupling parameter @xmath1 spin polarization @xmath2 @xmath3 is total electron density @xmath4 bohr radius @xmath5 density of up spin electrons interest in properties 2deg revived due to discovery metal - insulator transition valley degree of freedom important role transition at low density accurate treatment of electron correlation crucial quantum monte carlo ) simulations method choice for microscopic studies of 2deg recently provided analytic expression of correlation energy of 2v2deg focus on pair distribution functions ( pdfs related to exchange correlation properties system ref . @xcite pdfs serve purposes estimate of finite thickness effects on 2deg spin susceptibility applications in dft calculations test of accuracy of hypernetted - chain calculationspdf related probability finding two electrons at positions @xmath6 @xmath7 component - resolved pdf @xmath8 multicomponent 2deg defined as @xcite @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 creation annihilation field operators @xmath12 expectation value ground state @xmath13 electron density @xmath14 normalization @xmath15 exchange correlation homogeneous isotropic system @xmath16 depends on relative distance @xmath17 symmetry for index permutations @xmath18 @xmath19 concentration component @xmath14 total pdf @xmath20 reads @xmath21 2v2deg @xmath22 composite index denotes spin valley @xmath23 @xmath24 degrees freedom spans four cases @xmath25 2v ten different @xmath16 two symmetric valleys @xmath16 two @xmath26 five @xmath27 denote different @xmath16 labels @xmath27 @xmath28 simulation details same ref performed fixed - phase dmc simulations for @xmath29 @xmath30 reduce finite size effects used twist - averaged boundary conditions change @xmath31 by flipping spins at fixed electrons @xmath32sample pdfs performed simulations system @xmath33 electrons time steps chosen @xmath34 acceptance rate @xmath35 simulations 320 walkers twist grid same ref @xcite used slater - jastrow trial wave function @xmath36 considered plane - wave nodes accurate backflow bf nodes yield slight modifications pdfs bf effects energy bigger two - component case than four - component system @xcite dmc provides mixed estimate operator @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 ground state if @xmath37 commutes with @xmath40 @xmath41 coincides with expectation value ground state @xmath39 if @xmath37 commute @xmath40 compute extrapolated estimate @xmath42 @xmath43 variational mc expectation value @xmath36 accurate second order difference @xmath44 between @xmath39 @xmath36 @xmath45 solid lines represent total @xmath20 fig . 2vspinresolved -- examples 2v component - resolved pdfs @xmath26 @xmath31 lenghts in units @xmath46 component - resolved pdfs illustrate tendency local order electrons different species@xmath47 @xmath48 closer than electrons same species intermediate spin polarizations fig 2vspinresolved - component - resolved pdfs richer structure than @xmath26 qualitative features related to exchange correlations density diagonal pdf minority component strongly polarized system determined by exchange significant spin - polarization dependence pdfs disappears in total pdfs particularly @xmath34 in fig . 2vspinsummed total pdfs high density @xmath49 low density @xmath50 ) with zero full spin polarization dependence total pdf on @xmath34 depicted in fig @xmath51 @xmath34 small effect of exchange on total pdf with components small for @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath51 increasing peaks for @xmath34 lengths in units of @xmath46 full tabulations of calculated pdfs available upon request from first author 20 fowler stern f 1982 rev . phys . 54 * 437 shkolnikov vakili poortere shayegan 2004 92 * 246804 kravchenko s sarachik m 2004 rep. phys67 1 anissimova kravchenko punnoose finkelstein klapwijk 2007 nature phys 3 707 punnoose finkelstein 2005 310 289 gunawan gokmen vakili k padmanabhan poortere shayegan 2007 phys 3 388 tanatar ceperley d 1989 39 * 5005 kwon ceperley martin r 1993 48 12037 rapisarda senatore g 1996 49 * 16 conti s senatore g 1996 europhys 36 695 varsano d moroni s senatore g 2001 europhys 53 348 attaccalite c gori - giorgi moroni bachelet g 2002 88 * 256601 gori giorgi moroni bachelet 70 115102 marchi de palo s moroni senatore g 2008 correlation energy spin susceptibility electron gas mat/0808.2569 giuliani vignale g 2005 quantum theory electron liquid cambridge university press appendix a.4 de palo s botti m moroni s senatore g 2005 phys 94 * 226405 dharma - wardana perrot f 2004 phys 70 * 35308 foulkes mitas l needs r rajagopal g 200173 33 lin zong f h ceperley 2001 phys 64 016702
| 0.351997
| 2,284
| 1,217
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,635
|
we test the one - loop chiral perturbation theory formula on unquenched lattice data of pseudoscalar meson decay constants . the chiral extrapolation including the effect of the chiral logarithm is attempted and its uncertainty is discussed .
|
in the unquenched qcd simulations using the hybrid monte carlo algorithm , the computational cost rapidly grows as the chiral limit of sea quark is approached . in practical simulations with wilson - type fermions
the sea quark mass is limited to be heavier than @xmath0 . to obtain the physical results for @xmath1 and @xmath2 quarks , therefore
, the chiral extrapolation is indispensable . in the chiral extrapolation
the chiral perturbation theory ( chpt ) may be used to decide the functional form , as it is an effective theory valid for low energy qcd .
once the available lattice data are confirmed to be consistent with chpt , the extrapolation to the @xmath1 and @xmath2 quark masses using the chpt formula is justified .
the practical question is , then , whether the lattice results could reproduce the sea quark mass dependence , especially the chiral logarithm , predicted by chpt . in this talk
, we present the sea quark mass dependence of the pseudoscalar meson decay constant obtained in unquenched qcd , and compare them with the one - loop chpt prediction . the unquenched simulations
are done using the standard gauge and nonperturbatively @xmath3-improved fermion action at @xmath4 = 5.2 with sea quark masses corresponding to the pion mass in the range 5501000 mev .
further details of the simulation are discussed in a separate talk @xcite .
we also discuss the uncertainty associated with the chiral extrapolation taking light - light and heavy - light decay constants as examples .
in full qcd the chpt predicts a specific functional dependence of physical quantities on the quark mass , _
i.e. _ the chiral logarithm , at the one - loop order . for @xmath5 flavors of degenerate quarks with a mass @xmath6 , the pseudoscalar meson decay constant @xmath7 is given by @xcite @xmath8,\ ] ] with @xmath9 .
while the low energy constants @xmath10 are unknown parameters , the chiral log term @xmath11 appears with a definite coefficient depending only on the number of flavors .
[ fig : fpi_vs_mpi2 ] figure [ fig : fpi_vs_mpi2 ] shows the lattice results together with fitting curves . if we leave the coefficient of the chiral log term as a free parameter , the fit result is consistent with zero ( solid line ) , while the fit with the fixed coefficient @xmath12 gives a bad @xmath13 ( dashed line ) .
a similar observation is obtained for the pcac relation @xmath14 @xcite .
partially quenched chpt @xcite may be used to explicitly test the presence of the chiral logarithm . for non - degenerate pions composed of quarks with mass @xmath6 and @xmath15 ( @xmath16 denotes a valence quark ) ,
the low energy constants cancel out in the double ratios @xmath17 with @xmath18 , and only the chiral log terms remain . a parameter @xmath19 obtained as a coefficient of @xmath20 in ( [ eq : ratio_test_pcac ] ) and in ( [ eq : ratio_test_decay_constant ] )
are plotted as a function of @xmath21 in figure [ fig : ratio_test ] .
we find that the results are much smaller than the prediction of the partially quenched chpt shown by a steep dashed line .
[ fig : ratio_test ]
since the lattice data do not support the presence of the chiral logarithm for the sea quark masses used in the simulation , the chiral extrapolation using the one - loop chpt formula is not fully justified .
instead , we consider several possible functional forms to approach the chiral limit and discuss their associated uncertainty .
our observation suggests that the mass region where the chiral logarithm becomes important is around or below 500 mev , and the chpt ceases to converge above that scale .
then , a possible way to extrapolate the data including the effect of the chiral logarithm is to use a polynomial fit ( quadratic fit , for example ) above some energy scale @xmath22 , and then switch to the one - loop chpt formula below @xmath22 .
an example is shown in figure [ fig : fpi_chiral_log_below_m ] for @xmath22 = 300 and 500 mev .
the limit of @xmath22 = 0 mev corresponds to the usual polynomial fit . since the scale @xmath22 is unknown , the variation of several fit curves , about @xmath23 10% in the chiral limit ,
should be taken as systematic uncertainty .
another possible functional form suggested by the adelaide - mit group @xcite is the one - loop chpt with a hard momentum cutoff @xmath22 .
it amounts to replace the chiral log term @xmath24 by @xmath25 . changing the unknown `` cutoff '' scale @xmath22 from 0 to 1 gev
, we obtain the similar size of uncertainty in the chiral limit .
[ fig : fpi_chiral_log_below_m ] the su(3 ) breaking ratio in the decay constant @xmath26 may be obtained with a fit to partially quenched lattice data .
our result from the above fit functions changes from 1.167(3 ) ( quadratic fit , corresponding to @xmath22 = 0 mev ) or 1.190(3 ) ( adelaide - mit fit , @xmath22 = 500 mev ) to 1.276(7 ) ( chiral log plus quadratic , corresponding to @xmath27 mev ) .
although it is clear that our two - flavor qcd result is significantly higher than the quenched result 1.081(5)(17 ) @xcite and closer to the physical value 1.22 , the uncertainty is still sizable . for the heavy - light decay constant
the prediction of chpt is available in the heavy quark limit for quenched , partially quenched and full qcd @xcite .
the chiral logarithm appears with a definite coefficient but including an additional coupling constant @xmath28 describing the @xmath29 interaction . the chiral extrapolation of @xmath30 and @xmath31 including the chiral logarithm is shown in figure [ fig : fsqrtm_strange ] with two representative values of @xmath28 . as in the pion decay constant , the uncertainty in the chiral limit is enhanced by the chiral logarithm . the ratio @xmath32 is needed in the extraction of the ckm matrix element @xmath33 . since the bulk of systematic errors cancels in the ratio
, one may expect better accuracy than the determination of @xmath34 solely from @xmath35 .
our preliminary result varies from 1.24 ( quadratic fit ) to 1.38 ( chiral log , @xmath28 = 0.59 ) .
it suggests that the ratio and its error can be significanly larger than the previous world average 1.16(4 ) .
similar discussion , but using quenched data , has been made in @xcite .
[ fig : fsqrtm_strange ]
the chiral logarithm expected from chpt is not observed in the unquenched lattice data with @xmath36 greater than about 500 mev , which suggests that chpt may only be applied in smaller mass regions .
the estimate using model functions for the chiral extrapolation leads to the uncertainty as large as @xmath2310% for the decay constants .
this work is supported by the kek supercomputer project no .
79 ( fy 2002 ) , and also in part by the grant - in - aid of the ministry of education ( nos . 11640294 , 12640253 , 12740133 , 13135204 , 13640259 , 13640260 , 14046202 , 14740173 ) .
is supported by the jsps research fellowship .
j. gasser and h. leutwyler , annals phys .
* 158 * ( 1984 ) 142 ; nucl .
b * 250 * ( 1985 ) 465 .
s. aoki _ et al . _
[ jlqcd collaboration ] , nucl .
phys . proc
. suppl .
* 106 * , 224 ( 2002 ) .
sharpe , phys .
d * 56 * ( 1997 ) 7052 .
golterman and k.c .
leung , phys .
d * 57 * ( 1998 ) 5703 .
w. detmold _ et al .
_ , phys .
lett . * 87 * , 172001 ( 2001 ) .
j. heitger _
[ alpha collaboration ] , nucl .
b * 588 * , 377 ( 2000 ) .
m. j. booth , phys .
d * 51 * , 2338 ( 1995 ) .
s. r. sharpe and y. zhang , phys .
d * 53 * , 5125 ( 1996 ) .
a. s. kronfeld and s. m. ryan , arxiv : hep - ph/0206058 .
|
unquenched qcd simulations hybrid monte carlo algorithm computational cost grows chiral limit sea quark simulations wilson - type fermions sea quark mass heavier than @xmath0 physical results @xmath1 @xmath2 quarks chiral extrapolation indispensable perturbation theory functional form low energy qcd lattice data chpt extrapolation @xmath1 @xmath2 quark masses justified lattice results reproduce sea quark mass dependence chiral logarithm predicted chpt sea quark mass dependence pseudoscalar meson decay constant unquenched qcd one - loop chpt prediction simulations standard gauge nonperturbatively @xmath3-improved fermion action at @xmath4 = 5.2 sea quark masses pion mass range 5501000 mev details separate talk uncertainty chiral extrapolation light - light heavy - light decay constants full qcd chpt predicts functional dependence physical quantities on quark mass chiral logarithm one - loop order @xmath5 quarks mass @xmath6 pseudoscalar meson decay constant @xmath7 given by @xcite @xmath8 @xmath9low energy constants @xmath10 unknown chiral log term @xmath11 definite coefficient number flavors fig fpi_vs_mpi2 shows lattice results fitting curves coefficient chiral log term free fit result consistent with zero solid line fit with fixed coefficient @xmath12 bad @xmath13 dashed line similar observation pcac relation @xmath14 @xcite partially quenched chpt @xcite test chiral logarithm non - degenerate pions quarks mass @xmath6 @xmath15 @xmath16 valence quark low energy constants cancel out in double ratios @xmath17 @xmath18 chiral log terms remain parameter @xmath19 coefficient of @xmath20 ratio_test_pcac_decay_constant plotted function of @xmath21 results smaller than prediction partially quenched chpt steep dashed line lattice data support chiral logarithm for sea quark masses chiral extrapolation using one - loop chpt formula not justified consider several functional forms approach chiral limit discuss uncertainty mass region chiral logarithm important around or below 500 mev chpt ceases converge aboveextrapolate data chiral logarithm use polynomial fit above energy scale @xmath22 switch to one - loop chpt formula below example in figure for @xmath22 = 300 500 mev limit @xmath22 = 0 mev usual polynomial fit scale @xmath22 unknown variation of fit curves 10% in chiral limit systematic uncertainty functional form one - loop chpt with hard momentum cutoff @xmath22 chiral log term @xmath24 by @xmath25 changing unknown cutoff scale @xmath22 from 0 to 1 gev similar size uncertainty in chiral limit su(3 ) breaking ratio in decay constant @xmath26 obtained with fit to partially quenched lattice data result from changes from 1.167(3 to 1.276(7 ) two - flavor qcd result higher than quenched result 1.081(5)(17 ) @xcite closer to physical value 1.22 uncertainty sizable heavy - light decay constant prediction of chpt available in heavy quark limit for quenched partially quenched full qcd @xcite chiral logarithm coefficient additional coupling constant @xmath28 @xmath29 interaction chiral extrapolation of @xmath30 @xmath31 logarithm shown in figure two values @xmath28 uncertainty chiral limit enhanced chiral logarithm ratio @xmath32 needed extraction ckm matrix element @xmath33 systematic errors ratio better accuracy determination @xmath34 from @xmath35 preliminary result varies 1.24 to 1.38 ( chiral log @xmath28 = 0.59 ) ratio error larger than previous world average 1.16(4 ) similar discussion quenched data in @xcite chiral logarithm chpt not observed unquenched lattice data @xmath36 greater than 500 mev suggests chpt applied smaller mass regions estimate model functions chiral extrapolation leads uncertainty large @xmath2310% for decay constants work supported by kek supercomputer project 79 grant - in - aid ministry of education supported jsps research fellowship j. gasser h. leutwyler annals phys . * 158 ( 1984 ) 142250 * 1985 ) 465 aoki jlqcd collaboration phys . 106 224 ( 2002 ) sharpe phys . 56 * 1997 ) 7052 golterman leung . 57 * 1998 ) 5703 detmold phys . 87 * 172001 ( 2001 ) heitger alpha collaboration ( 2000 ) booth . 51 * 2338 ( 1995 ) sharpe zhang phys . d 53 * 5125 ( 1996 ) kronfeld m. ryan arxiv hep - ph/0206058
| 0.314893
| 2,044
| 1,044
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,637
|
in this talk , i present the minimal classically scale - invariant and @xmath0-symmetric extension of the standard model , containing one additional complex gauge singlet and three flavors of right - handed majorana neutrinos , incorporated within a renormalizable framework of gravity , consistent with these symmetries ; the agravity .
i particularly focus on the slow - roll inflationary paradigm within this framework , by identifying the pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson of the ( approximate ) scale symmetry with the inflaton field , constructing its one - loop effective potential , computing the slow - roll parameters and the inflationary observables , and demonstrating the compatibility of the small field inflation scenario with the latest planck collaboration data sets .
|
the classical scale invariance formalism has been considered as a ( approximate ) symmetry to protect various putative scales within nature from a mutual quadratic destabilization , posing as an economical solution to the hierarchy problem @xcite . in this treatment
, we consider a minimal extension of the standard model ( sm ) by adding a complex gauge singlet scalar and three flavors of the right - handed majorana neutrinos , while imposing the @xmath0 as well as the classical scale symmetry .
the model is embedded with the renormalizable framework of agravity @xcite , which also respects the imposed symmetries .
while the imposed @xmath0 invariance prevents the singlet pseudoscalar from decaying , rendering it a stable dark matter candidate , nonzero masses for the sm neutrinos may be generated using the seesaw mechanism @xcite . a nonzero singlet vacuum expectation value ( vev )
is dynamically generated _ a la _ coleman - weinberg @xcite , which subsequently induces the ( reduced ) planck scale via the scalar non - minimal couplings , as well as the weak scale by means of the higgs portal operators , accommodating the discovered 125 gev state @xcite .
it also generates appropriate mass terms for the dark matter , and the right - handed majorana neutrinos .
the scale symmetry protects the various scales from a mutual quadratic destabilization .
we explore the slow - roll inflationary paradigm within the introduced framework , by identifying the pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson of the ( approximate ) scale symmetry with the inflaton field , and construct the one - loop effective potential for this field .
trans - planckian field excursions are accommodated within the agravity framework .
we compute the slow - roll parameters and the inflationary observables , and demonstrate the viability of the inflationary paradigm within the introduced model , in accordance with the latest observational data , published by the planck collaboration @xcite .
we minimally extend the sm content by introducing one complex gauge singlet scalar .
the full scalar potential is conjectured to respect the @xmath0 as well as the scale symmetry , and contains the following operators in its most general form @xmath1 where , @xmath2 and @xmath3 are the sm doublet and singlet , respectively , @xmath4 } \ .\ ] ] the nonzero vevs of the @xmath0-even scalars are generated dynamically ( @xmath5 gev ) ; in particular , once the singlet vev , @xmath6 , is induced via the coleman - weinberg mechanism @xcite , it is transmitted to the sm sector via the higgs portal operators with the coefficients @xmath7 , leading to a mass term for the higgs field , @xmath8 , triggering the spontaneous breaking of the electroweak symmetry @xmath9 interestingly , the @xmath0 symmetry protects the pseudoscalar singlet , @xmath10 , from decaying , rendering it a stable dark matter candidate @xcite .
in addition , one may include three flavors of the right - handed majorana neutrinos , @xmath11 , in order to give masses to the sm neutrinos by means of the see - saw mechanism @xcite . assuming a @xmath0- and scale - symmetric singlet sector , the right - handed majorana neutrino masses may be generated via their yukawa interactions with the singlet @xmath12 } -\frac{1}{2}y_{n } { \left ( s + s^ * \right ) } \bar{\mathcal{n}}^{i}\mathcal{n}^{i } \ , \ ] ] where , for simplicity
, a flavor - universal yukawa coupling , @xmath13 , is considered . in order to consistently account for the gravitational contributions , pertinent to the inflationary paradigm and the trans - planckian excursion of the inflaton , the described minimal extension of the sm
is entirely embedded within the renormalizable , and @xmath0- and scale - symmetric framework of the agravity @xcite . in the jordan frame ,
the full action is of the form @xmath14 where , in addition to the previously introduced scalar potential , the majorana neutrino and the remaining sm lagrangians , one includes the non - minimal couplings of the scalars to the curvature , @xmath15 and @xmath16 , as well as the pure agravity ( higher - derivative ) operators with the dimensionless couplings @xmath17 .
while the @xmath18 operator gives rise to a scalar graviton , the @xmath19 operator ( the weyl term ) produces the usual massless spin-2 graviton together with its `` lee - wick '' ( lw ) partner @xcite , @xmath20 , which is a massive spin-2 ghost with a negative norm .
one notes that the einstein - hilbert term , @xmath21 , is absent in due to the classical scale invariance requirement .
however , the non - minimal couplings induce such a term , once the nonzero vevs are obtained . therefore ,
both the ( reduced ) planck and the weak scales are induced dynamically via the vev of the singlet within the current framework . performing the local weyl transformation
, one can show that the einstein frame action , with the canonical einstein - hilbert term manifestly exhibited , reads @xmath22}^2 \right\ } } \label{ve},\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath23 the scalar graviton in its `` conformal '' definition , and @xmath24 .
the physical vev of the system can be pinpointed by employing the gildner - weinberg procedure @xcite , where one initially minimizes the tree - level potential .
this defines the flat direction of the potential at a particular energy scale , @xmath25 .
the one - loop corrections then predominantly matter only along this flat direction , where they lift the flatness and specify the true vacuum . performing the tree - level minimization ,
one obtains @xmath26 where , the ellipses correspond to one - loop contributions due to fixing the cosmological constant to zero at one - loop . since a classical scale - invariant treatment of the cosmological constant problem is outside the scope of this work , such terms should be simply neglected .
the relations are examples of the dimensional transmutation phenomenon , and demonstrate the absence of a quadratic sensitivity of various scales to one another . in particular , the weak scale is not quadratically sensitive to the singlet vev scale , since the @xmath27 mixing coupling is not a free parameter .
the three @xmath0-even scalars of the framework , @xmath28 , are mixed with one another in the quadratic part of the lagrangian , and can be rotated into the physical mass basis using an orthogonal @xmath29 matrix with the mixing angles @xmath30 , @xmath31 where , @xmath32 corresponds to the physical 125 gev state discovered by the lhc @xcite , @xmath33 is massless at tree - level , serving as the pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson of the ( approximate ) scale symmetry , and @xmath34 denotes the physical scalar graviton .
one , subsequently , obtains along the flat direction ( c.f ) @xmath35 once more , signifying the absence of a quadratic destabilization among the separate dynamically - induced scales .
the pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson of the ( approximate ) scale symmetry , @xmath33 , can be expressed in terms of the radial combination of the field basis scalars @xmath36 the kinetic term of this scalar has a non - canonical form , @xmath37 } $ ] ( c.f . )
; however , using the field redefinition ( c.f . and ) @xmath38 its kinetic term can be brought into the canonical form , @xmath39 .
note that the kinetic term of the @xmath33 boson becomes canonical at the minimum ; hence , one can set @xmath40 . along the flat direction ,
the one - loop contributions to the potential can be written according to @xmath41 } \
, \label{v1fin } \\
\mathcal m^{4}\equiv&\ , 5 m_{\theta}^{4}+ m_{\kappa}^{4}+ m_{\chi}^{4 } -6 m_{\mathcal n}^{4}+ m_{h}^{4}+6m_{w}^{4 } + 3m_{z}^{4 } -12m_{t}^{4 } \label{bmodel } \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where , the heavy sm degrees of freedom in the loop are also taken into account for completeness .
the one - loop corrections is negative at its minimum ; however , the tree - level potential is non - vanishing along the flat direction , due to the gravitational contributions , and can be utilized to fix the minimum of the full one - loop potential ( the cosmological constant at one - loop ) to zero .
therefore , one obtains for the full one - loop effective potential along the flat direction @xmath42 } \ .\ ] ] this potential induces a radiative mass term for the @xmath33 scalar @xmath43 and is bounded from below ( and positive definite ) for @xmath44 , implying @xmath45 which , also yields a non - tachyonic mass for the @xmath33 boson .
the pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson of the ( approximate ) scale symmetry in its canonical form , @xmath46 , may be identified with the inflaton of the framework , possessing the one - loop effective potential along the flat direction . from this potential
the slow - roll parameters can be easily computed @xmath47 where , the field subscripts denote taking the appropriate derivative(s ) of the potential with respect to the argument . additionally , the number of @xmath48-foldings is easily found using the slow - roll equations of motion , and is given by @xmath49 + \frac{\sigma_{c}^2}{8 \bar{m}_\text{p}^2 } \right\ } } \bigg|_{\sigma_{c , e}}^{\sigma_{c , i } } \ , \end{split}\ ] ] with @xmath50 and @xmath51 the values of the @xmath46 inflaton at the beginning and at the end of the inflation , respectively , @xmath52 the exponential integral ( @xmath53 ) , and @xmath54 the logarithmic integral ( @xmath55 ) .
the inflation comes to an end , once the condition @xmath56 is reached .
the inflaton field value at the horizon crossing point , @xmath57 , can subsequently be obtained from for a given @xmath48-folding number , as a function of the mixing angle @xmath58 .
the amplitude of the scalar perturbations , @xmath59 , the scalar spectral index , @xmath60 , the tensor - to - scalar ratio , @xmath61 , and its running , @xmath62 , are defined according to @xmath63 with the subscripted asterisk denoting the field value @xmath57 .
given the inflaton potential and the slow - roll parameter definitions , these quantities are easily determined , as functions of @xmath64 , @xmath65 , and the field value @xmath50 at the horizon exit . plane , along with the predictions of the current framework for both the small and large field inflation scenarios ( dashed lines ) .
two @xmath48-folding number benchmarks , @xmath66 , are selected and the full range of the mixing angle , @xmath67 , is considered .
the diagonal line labeled as `` @xmath68-model '' denotes the chaotic inflation scenario , in the @xmath69 limit .
[ fig : nsr ] ] the predictions of the current framework for these observables are displayed within the @xmath70 plane of fig .
[ fig : nsr ] , for the small and the large field inflation scenarios .
several benchmark values of the mixing angle are exhibited for @xmath66 .
in addition , the observational constraints from several planck collaboration published data sets at 68% and 95% c.l .
@xcite are incorporated within the plot . in the limit @xmath69 , the inflaton potential reduces to the ordinary chaotic inflation scenario near its minimum @xmath71 with the limiting values @xmath72 therefore , we have @xmath73 for @xmath74 , and @xmath75 for @xmath76 . in contrast , the @xmath77 limit is for the most part compatible with the observational data within the small field inflation scenario .
while in the large field inflation scenario the potential becomes increasingly steeper , the small field inflation scenario is characterized by a relatively flat potential with a very small @xmath78 slow - roll parameter .
hence the @xmath79 slow - roll parameter dominates the behavior of the spectral index ( c.f . ) , and one obtains for the leading - order behavior in this scenario @xmath80
a minimal extension of the sm has been developed by introducing one complex singlet scalar and three ( mass - degenerate ) right - handed majorana neutrinos .
the singlet sector is postulated to respect the @xmath0 as well as the classical scale symmetry , and is embedded within the renormalizable agravity framework .
the @xmath0 symmetry prohibits a decay of the singlet pseudoscalar , rendering it a stable dark matter candidate , whereas the sm neutrinos obtain nonzero masses via the seesaw mechanism .
the singlet vev , dynamically generated via the coleman - weinberg mechanism , simultaneously induces the weak scale ( via the higgs portal operators ) as well as the ( reduced ) planck scale ( via the scalar non - minimal couplings to the curvature ) .
furthermore , it generates mass terms for the right - handed majorana neutrinos ( via yukawa interactions ) and the dark matter .
it is shown that the scale symmetry protects the various scales from a mutual quadratic destabilization . identifying the pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson of the ( approximate ) scale symmetry of the model , in its canonical form , with the inflaton field
, its one - loop effective potential is constructed , and the viability of the slow - roll inflationary paradigm is validated ; in particular , a trans - planckian field excursion is consistently accommodated utilizing the agravity framework .
it is demonstrated that small field inflation scenario can be rendered fully compatible with the latest observational data for the suitable @xmath48-folding numbers , within the minimal classically scale invariant framework .
w. a. bardeen , `` on naturalness in the standard model '' , fermilab - conf-95 - 391-t , `` beyond higgs '' , fermilab - conf-08 - 118- t ; h. aoki and s. iso , phys .
d * 86 * , 013001 ( 2012 ) [ arxiv:1201.0857 [ hep - ph ] ] .
p. minkowski , phys .
b * 67 * ( 1977 ) 421 ; t. yanagida , in _ proceedings of the workshop on the unified theory and the baryon number in the universe _ ( o. sawada and a. sugamoto , eds . ) , kek , tsukuba , japan , 1979 , p.95 ; m. gell - mann , p. ramond , and r. slansky , _ supergravity _ ( p. van nieuwenhuizen et al . , eds ) , north holland , amsterdam , 1979 , p.315 ; r. n. mohapatra and g. senjanovi , phys . rev .
* 44 * ( 1980 ) 912 ; j. schechter and j. w. f. valle , phys .
d * 22 * , 2227 ( 1980 ) .
|
classical scale invariance formalism scales from quadratic destabilization economical solution to hierarchy problem minimal extension standard model adding complex gauge singlet scalar three flavors right - handed majorana neutrinos imposing @xmath0 classical scale symmetry model embedded with renormalizable framework agravity respects symmetries @xmath0 invariance prevents singlet pseudoscalar decaying stable dark matter candidate nonzero masses for sm neutrinos generated using seesaw mechanism nonzero singlet vacuum expectation value dynamically generated weinberg induces reduced planck scale weak scale higgs portal operators 125 gev state generates mass terms for dark matter right - handed majorana neutrinos scale symmetry protects scales from quadratic destabilization explore slow - roll inflationary paradigm pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson scale symmetry with inflaton field one - loop effective potential trans - planckian field excursions accommodated within agravity framework compute slow - roll parameters inflationary observables demonstrate viability inflationary paradigm latest observational data collaboration minimally extend sm content introducing one complex gauge singlet scalarfull scalar potential @xmath0 scale symmetry contains operators @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 are sm doublet singlet @xmath4 nonzero vevs @xmath0-even scalars generated dynamically @xmath5 singlet vev @xmath6 induced via coleman - weinberg mechanism transmitted to sm sector via higgs portal operators coefficients @xmath7 leading mass term higgs field @xmath8 breaking electroweak symmetry @xmath9 @xmath0 symmetry protects pseudoscalar singlet @xmath10 from decaying stable dark matter candidate include three flavors right - handed majorana neutrinos @xmath11 give masses to sm neutrinos see - saw mechanism @xmath0- scale - symmetric singlet sector right - handed majorana neutrino masses generated via yukawa interactions with singlet @xmath12\mathcal flavor - universal yukawa coupling @xmath13 consideredaccount for gravitational contributions inflationary paradigm trans - planckian excursion minimal extension sm embedded within renormalizable- scale - symmetric framework agravity @xcite jordan frame full action form @xmath14 scalar potential majorana neutrino sm lagrangians includes non - minimal couplings scalars to curvature @xmath15 @xmath16 pure agravity higher - derivative operators with dimensionless couplings @xmath17 @xmath18 operator scalar graviton @xmath19 operator weyl term produces massless spin-2 graviton lee - wick partner @xcite @xmath20 massive spin-2 ghost negative norm einstein - hilbert term @xmath21 absent classical scale invariance requirement non - minimal couplings induce term nonzero vevs obtained reduced planck weak scales induced dynamically via vev singlet framework local weyl transformation einstein frame action canonical einstein - hilbert term exhibited reads @xmath22 with @xmath23 scalar graviton definition @xmath24 physical vev system pinpointed gildner - weinberg procedure @xcite minimizes tree - level potentialdefines flat direction potential energy scale @xmath25 one - loop corrections matter flat direction lift flatness specify true vacuum tree - level minimization obtains @xmath26 ellipses one - loop contributions fixing cosmological constant zero classical scale - invariant treatment cosmological constant outside scope terms neglected relations dimensional transmutation demonstrate absence quadratic scales weak scale not quadratically sensitive singlet vev scale @xmath27 mixing coupling not free parameter three @xmath0-even scalars @xmath28 mixed quadratic part lagrangian rotated physical mass basis orthogonal @xmath29 matrix mixing angles @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 corresponds physical 125 gev state @xmath33 massless at tree - level pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson scale symmetry @xmath34 denotes physical scalar graviton obtains flat direction @xmath35 absence quadratic destabilization dynamically - induced scales pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson symmetry @xmath33 expressed radial combination field basis scalars @xmath36 kinetic term scalar non - canonical form @xmath37.fusing field redefinition @xmath38 kinetic term into canonical form @xmath39 kinetic term @xmath33 boson becomes canonical at minimum set @xmath40 flat direction one - loop contributions to potential written according to @xmath41\mathcal m^{4\theta}^{4}\kappa}^{4}}^{4^{4^{4}^{4{z}^{4_{t}^{4{bmodel{aligned heavy sm degrees of freedom in loop for completeness one - loop corrections negative at minimum tree - level potential non - vanishing along flat direction due to gravitational contributions to fix minimum full one - loop potential to zero obtains full one - loop effective potential flat direction @xmath42 potential induces radiative mass term for @xmath33 scalar @xmath43 bounded from below positive for @xmath44 @xmath45 yields non - tachyonic mass for @xmath33 boson pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson canonical form @xmath46 identified with inflaton framework one - loop effective potential along flat directionpotential slow - roll parameters computed @xmath47 field subscripts denote derivative(s potential argument number of @xmath48-foldings found using slow - roll equations motion given by @xmath49 +\frac{\sigma_{c}^2{8{p}^2\sigma @xmath50 @xmath51 values of @xmath46 inflaton beginning end inflation @xmath52 exponential integral @xmath53 @xmath54 logarithmic integral @xmath55 ) inflation condition @xmath56 reached inflaton field value at crossing point @xmath57 obtained from @xmath48-folding number function of mixing angle @xmath58 amplitude of scalar perturbations @xmath59 scalar spectral index tensor - to - scalar ratio running @xmath62 defined @xmath63 subscripted asterisk field value @xmath57 inflaton potential slow - roll parameter definitions quantities determined functions of @xmath64 @xmath65 field value @xmath50 at horizon exit plane predictions current framework for small large field inflation scenarios@xmath48-folding benchmarks @xmath66 selected full range mixing angle @xmath67 considered diagonal line @xmath68-model denotes chaotic inflation scenario @xmath69 limit predictions current framework displayed @xmath70 plane small large field inflation scenarios benchmark values mixing angle exhibited for @xmath66 observational constraints from planck collaboration data sets 68% 95% c.l. @xcite incorporated limit @xmath69 inflaton potential reduces to ordinary chaotic inflation scenario minimum @xmath71 limiting values @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 for @xmath76 @xmath77 limit compatible with observational data small field inflation scenario large field inflation scenario potential steeper small field inflation flat potential small @xmath78 slow - roll parameter @xmath79 slow - roll parameter dominates behavior spectral index leading behavior @xmath80 minimal extension sm developed complex singlet scalar three right - handed majorana neutrinos singlet sector @xmath0 classical scale symmetry embedded renormalizable agravity framework@xmath0 symmetry prohibits decay singlet pseudoscalar stable dark matter candidate sm neutrinos obtain nonzero masses via seesaw mechanism singlet vev generated coleman - weinberg mechanism induces weak scale higgs portal operators planck scale scalar - couplings generates mass terms for right - handed majorana neutrinos yukawa interactions dark matter scale symmetry protects scales from quadratic destabilization pseudo - nambu - goldstone boson scale symmetry field one - loop potential constructed viability slow - roll inflationary paradigm validated trans - planckian field excursion accommodated agravity framework small field inflation scenario compatible with observational data @xmath48-folding numbers scale invariant framework bardeen naturalness standard model fermilab - conf-95 - 391-t higgs - 118- aoki s. iso phys . d * 86 * 013001 ( 2012 ) arxiv:1201.0857 minkowski phys . b * 67 * ( 1977 ) 421 t yanagida proceedings workshop unified theory baryon number universe sawada sugamoto tsukuba japan 1979 p.95gell - mann ramond r. slansky supergravity north holland amsterdam 1979 p.315 n. mohapatra g. senjanovi phys . rev 44 1980 ) 912 j. w f. valle phys . 22 2227 1980 )
| 0.572315
| 3,447
| 1,780
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,655
|
penrose lifshits mushrooms are planar domains coming in nonisometric pairs with the same geodesic length spectrum .
recently s. zelditch raised the question whether such billiards also have the same eigenvalue spectrum for the dirichlet laplacian ( conjecturing `` no '' ) . here
we show that generically ( in the class of smooth domains ) the two members of a mushroom pair have different spectra .
|
michael lifshits ( unpublished ) , exploiting a type of construction attributed to r. penrose ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) , constructed a class of pairs of planar domains that , while not isometric , have periodic geodesics of exactly the same lengths ( including multiplicities ) .
at least when the boundaries are smooth ( @xmath0 ) , it follows that the two billiards have the same wave invariants , in the sense that the traces of their wave groups , @xmath1 , differ at most by a smooth function @xcite . in a recent review of the inverse spectral problem @xcite s.
zelditch asked whether the dirichlet laplacians , @xmath2 , for the two domains are necessarily isospectral , judging that proposition `` dubious '' but not yet refuted .
given the refutation , such billiards provide a kind of converse to the famous examples of `` drums that sound the same '' @xcite , being drums that sound different but are very similar geometrically in fact , in the geometrical features deemed most relevant to spectrum . in this paper
we show how to construct smooth penrose
lifshits mushroom pairs that are not isospectral , and we argue that inequality of the dirichlet spectra is , in fact , quite generic . since the domains are smooth ( but not convex ) , the spectral difference is not attributable to diffraction from corners , which would muddy the definition or the relevance of `` periodic geodesics '' .
the construction of a mushroom starts from a half - ellipse @xmath3 with foci @xmath4 and @xmath5 : we use the tilde , whether applied to regions , curves , or points , to indicate the operation of reflection through the minor axis of the ellipse .
if two entities are interchanged by that reflection , we call them _ dual_. next , add two bumps , @xmath6 on the left and @xmath7 on the right , with @xmath8 , to form a smooth domain @xmath9 : finally , add another bump ( not self - dual ) between the foci in two dual ways ( @xmath10 and @xmath11 ) to get two domains @xmath12 : we call the domains @xmath13 and @xmath14 constructed in this manner _ a penrose lifshits mushroom pair_. we repeat that the bumps can be added in such a way that the boundaries remain smooth
. that assumption , however , is needed mainly to draw a clean conclusion about equality of the length spectra . the conclusions about the dirichlet spectra hold even if the domain has corners ( in which case bump @xmath7 is superfluous ) .
[ t : non - isospectral ] if @xmath6 and @xmath7 are given and not dual , then there exist dual bumps @xmath10 and @xmath11 such that the resulting penrose lifshits mushrooms @xmath15 have the same length spectra and wave invariants but are not isospectral .
first we review the proof that the length spectra coincide @xcite .
the geodesics in an ellipse fall into two disjoint categories @xcite : those that intersect the major axis between the foci , and those that do so at or beyond the foci .
( the only exception is the major axis itself .
the smoothness assumption guarantees that the major axis will not bifurcate in @xmath15 by diffraction . )
it follows that a similar division holds for the domains @xmath15 we have just described : any geodesic originating in a bump @xmath6 or @xmath7 can never reach a bump @xmath10 or @xmath11 , and vice versa .
now , the geodesics that do not intersect the focal segment @xmath16 are exactly the same for the two domains . on the other hand , those for @xmath13 that do intersect this segment are identified one - to - one with their duals in @xmath14 by the reflection operation .
this shows length isospectrality .
equality of the wave traces modulo smooth functions follows from the hyperbolic propagation of singularities along geodesics see @xcite and references therein .
our main task is to show nonisospectrality for some choice of @xmath10 .
consider the spectrum of @xmath13 assuming that the bump @xmath10 is small and has support on the left half of the focal segment ; i.e. , to construct @xmath13 the ( open ) segment @xmath17 in the boundary of @xmath9 is perturbed by the graph of a smooth , compactly supported ( and nonpositive ) function @xmath18 , where @xmath19 is a small parameter .
let @xmath20 be the ground state of the dirichlet laplacian on @xmath9 and @xmath21 be the corresponding lowest eigenvalue .
the known rayleigh
hadamard formula for change of the spectrum under domain perturbations ( e.g. , @xcite or ( * ? ? ?
* section 15.1 , exercise 9 ) ) shows that if @xmath22 where @xmath23 is the normal derivative of the eigenfunction on the boundary , then the lowest eigenvalue @xmath21 changes under the perturbation .
in fact , this integral gives the derivative at @xmath24 of the lowest eigenvalue with respect to @xmath19 .
thus , if we could guarantee that the values of this integral are different for the two small perturbation domains @xmath12 , this would imply their non - isospectrality : the lowest dirichlet eigenvalues would change with different velocities . since the choice of the perturbation shape @xmath25 is in our hands , in order to make these integrals different , and thus domains nonisospectral , it is sufficient to have two mutually dual segments inside the focal segment such that the square of the normal derivative of the ground state is not an even function on their union , @xmath26 .
indeed , in this case we could find an even perturbation @xmath25 that would provide nonequal integrals ( in fact , almost any perturbation would do ) .
[ l : lemma ] if the bumps @xmath27 are not dual with respect to the minor axis of the ellipse , there is no self - dual union @xmath26 of two segments inside @xmath16 such that the square of the normal derivative @xmath28 of the ground state @xmath20 for @xmath9 is even on @xmath26 .
* proof of the lemma .
* suppose that @xmath29 is even on @xmath26 .
since the normal derivative is continuous , by shrinking @xmath26 if necessary , we may assume that @xmath30 itself is either even or odd on @xmath26 .
suppose first that the normal derivative is even .
introduce the orthogonal cartesian coordinates centered at @xmath31 and with @xmath32-axis going along the major axis .
consider the function @xmath33 . both @xmath20 and @xmath34 satisfy the same eigenfunction equation inside the half - ellipse @xmath3 and have the same cauchy data on @xmath26 .
therefore , according to holmgren s uniqueness theorem , they agree on their common domain . in particular , @xmath20 must satisfy zero dirichlet boundary conditions not only on @xmath35 , but also on its mirror reflection with respect to the minor axis of the ellipse .
since the bumps @xmath27 are assumed not dual to each other , we conclude that @xmath20 vanishes somewhere inside @xmath9 ( or @xmath34 somewhere inside @xmath36 ) .
that is , @xmath20 has a nodal curve , which is well known to be impossible for a ground state ( e.g. , @xcite ) .
if @xmath28 is odd on @xmath26 , one only needs to define @xmath34 as @xmath37 to obtain an analogous contradiction .
this concludes the proof of the lemma , and hence of theorem [ t : non - isospectral ] .
in fact , a closer look at the proof of the theorem shows that the nonisospectrality holds for smooth penrose lifshits mushrooms @xmath15 for any nondual bumps @xmath27 and for `` generic '' dual bumps @xmath38 : [ t : generic ] for any fixed choice of nondual bumps @xmath39 , nonisospectrality holds for an open and dense ( in @xmath0-topology ) set of penrose lifshits pairs @xmath12 . indeed
, the set of nonisospectral pairs @xmath15 is obviously open .
the previous theorem states that the closure of this set contains the domain @xmath9 ( i.e. , the one where the bumps @xmath40 are absent ) . to show density
, one can apply a similar proof by small perturbation to any pair of mushroom domains @xmath15 of the type constructed above . indeed
, if the pair is already non - isospectral , there is nothing to prove .
if it is isospectral , let @xmath41 be the ground state in @xmath15 .
as in theorem [ t : non - isospectral ] , the perturbation method described above works if one can show absence of a dual pair @xmath42 of pieces of the boundaries @xmath43 such that @xmath44 , @xmath45 and that @xmath46 is equal after reflection to @xmath47 .
now , the same consideration as in the proof of lemma [ l : lemma ] applies to justify this claim .
* a different proof of generic non - isospectrality claimed in theorem [ t : generic ] follows from existence of non - isospectral mushroom domains ( theorem [ t : non - isospectral ] ) , analytic dependence of the ground state on the domain @xcite , and connectedness of the manifold of these domains . *
as it is not hard to establish , the set of non - isospectral mushroom pairs is open in a much weaker topology than @xmath0 . indeed ,
if the domains @xmath15 are distorted by a pair of dual ( in the sense used in this text ) @xmath48-diffeomorphisms that are @xmath48-close to identity , the non - isospectrality is preserved .
* one can find discussion of the effects of domain variation for general elliptic boundary value problems in the nice little book @xcite , which regrettably is available only in russian .
some of its results can be found in preceding publications of the authors of that book .
this small note is the result of discussion at a working seminar of the recent survey @xcite by steve zelditch .
the authors would like to thank the seminar participants g. berkolaiko , j. harrison and b. winn , as well as s. zelditch and j. zhou , for discussion and useful comments .
the work of p. kuchment was partially supported by the nsf grant dms 0406022 .
p. kuchment expresses his gratitude to nsf for this support .
the content of this paper does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the federal government of the usa , and no official endorsement should be inferred .
r. b. melrose , the inverse spectral problem for planar domains .
_ instructional workshop on analysis and geometry _
, part i ( canberra , 1995 ) , 137160 , proc .
centre math .
univ . , * 34 * , austral .
univ . , canberra , 1996 ( ` http://www-math.mit.edu/~rbm/papers/anulec/anulec.pdf ` ) .
|
michael lifshits unpublished exploiting construction attributed to r. penrose constructed class planar domains not isometric periodic geodesics same lengths including multiplicities boundaries smooth @xmath0 two billiards have same wave invariants traces of wave groups @xmath1 differ by smooth function @xcite review inverse spectral problem @xcite s. zelditch asked dirichlet laplacians @xmath2 for two domains isospectral dubious not refuted refutation billiards provide converse to `` drums that sound the same '' different similar geometrically paper construct smooth penrose lifshits mushroom pairs not isospectral argue inequality of dirichlet spectra is generic domains smooth not convex spectral difference not attributable to diffraction from corners definition relevance of periodic geodesics construction of mushroom starts from half - ellipse @xmath3 with foci @xmath4 and @xmath5 use tilde indicate operation of reflection through minor axis ellipse if two entities interchanged by reflection call them _ dual_.add two bumps @xmath6 left right with @xmath8 smooth domain @xmath9 add another bump not self - dual between foci @xmath10 two domains @xmath12 domains @xmath13 @xmath14 penrose lifshits mushroom pair bumps added boundaries remain smooth assumption needed conclusion equality length spectra conclusions dirichlet spectra hold if domain corners bump @xmath7 superfluous non - isospectral if @xmath6 @xmath7 not dual exist dual bumps @xmath10 @xmath11 resulting penrose lifshits mushrooms @xmath15 same length spectra wave invariants not isospectral review proof length spectra coincide geodesics in ellipse fall two disjoint categories intersect major axis between foci at or beyond foci exception major axis smoothness assumption guarantees bifurcate in @xmath15 by diffraction similar division for domains @xmath15 geodesic originating in bump @xmath6 or @xmath7 reach bump @xmath10 or geodesics not intersect focal segment @xmath16 same for two domains@xmath13 segment identified with duals @xmath14 by reflection operation shows length isospectrality equality of wave traces smooth functions from hyperbolic propagation singularities along geodesics main task show nonisospectrality for @xmath10 consider spectrum of @xmath13 bump @xmath10 small support left half focal segment construct @xmath13 open segment @xmath17 boundary @xmath9 perturbed by smooth supported function @xmath18 @xmath19 small parameter @xmath20 be ground state of dirichlet laplacian @xmath9 @xmath21 lowest eigenvalue rayleigh hadamard formula for change spectrum under domain perturbations shows @xmath22 @xmath23 normal derivative of eigenfunction boundary lowest eigenvalue @xmath21 changes under perturbation integral gives derivative at @xmath24 of lowest eigenvalue @xmath19 values integral different for two small perturbation domains @xmath12 non - isospectrality lowest eigenvalues change with different velocitieschoice perturbation shape @xmath25 in our hands integrals different nonisospectral sufficient two dual segments inside focal segment square normal derivative ground not even union @xmath26 even perturbation @xmath25 nonequal integrals if bumps @xmath27 not dual minor axis ellipse no self - dual union @xmath26 two segments inside @xmath16 square normal derivative @xmath28 @xmath20 @xmath9 even on @xmath26 @xmath29 even on @xmath26 normal derivative continuous shrinking @xmath26 assume @xmath30 even or odd on @xmath26 normal derivative even introduce orthogonal cartesian coordinates at @xmath31 @xmath32-axis major axis consider function @xmath33 @xmath20 @xmath34 satisfy same eigenfunction equation half - ellipse @xmath3 same cauchy data on @xmath26 holmgren s uniqueness theorem agree on common domain @xmath20 satisfy zero dirichlet boundary conditions on @xmath35 mirror reflection minor axis ellipse bumps @xmath27 not dual @xmath20 vanishes inside @xmath9 or @xmath34 inside @xmath36@xmath20 has nodal curve impossible for ground state @xcite @xmath28 odd on @xmath26 define @xmath34 as @xmath37 analogous contradiction concludes proof of lemma theorem [ t : non - isospectral ] closer nonisospectrality holds for smooth penrose lifshits mushrooms @xmath15 nondual bumps @xmath27 generic dual bumps @xmath38 nondual @xmath39 nonisospectrality holds for open and dense set of penrose lifshits pairs @xmath12 set of nonisospectral pairs @xmath15 open closure contains domain @xmath9 where bumps @xmath40 absent density apply similar proof by small perturbation to mushroom domains @xmath15 if pair non - isospectral nothing to prove if isospectral let @xmath41 be ground state in @xmath15 perturbation method works if absence of dual pair @xmath42 of boundaries @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 equal after reflection to @xmath47 same consideration proof of lemma applies claimproof of generic non - isospectrality in theorem t follows from non - isospectral mushroom domains analytic dependence ground state on domain @xcite connectedness of manifold domains non - isospectral mushroom pairs open in weaker topology than @xmath0 if domains @xmath15 distorted by dual @xmath48-diffeomorphisms non - isospectrality preserved discussion effects domain variation for elliptic boundary value problems in book @xcite available in russian results in preceding publications note result of discussion at seminar survey @xcite by steve zelditch authors thank seminar participants g. berkolaiko j. harrison b. winn s. zelditch j. zhou for discussion comments work of p. kuchment supported by nsf grant dms 0406022 gratitude content paper reflect position policy federal government no official endorsement r. b. melrose inverse spectral problem for planar domains instructional workshop on analysis geometry part i canberra 1995 137160 centre math . univ . austral . univ . canberra 1996 http://www-math.mit.edu~rbm/papers/anulec.pdf
| 0.433036
| 2,535
| 1,335
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,658
|
di - gluon fusion mechanism might account for the large branching ratios of @xmath0 .
but because we know little about the effective @xmath1 vertex , there are large uncertainties in perturbative qcd estimations . in this paper
, we try several kinds of @xmath1 form factors and compare the numerical results with the experiment .
we find that , though we know little about @xmath1 form factor , if di - gluon fusion mechanism is important in @xmath0 , the branching ratios of the decays @xmath2 would be around @xmath3 which can be tested by future experiments . *
pacs numbers 13.25.hw 13.20.he *
|
recently , cleo collaboration have improved their previous measurements of @xmath0 @xcite : @xmath4 these branching ratios are much larger than the estimations under the standard theorectical frame which is based on the effective hamiltonian and general factorization approximation .
now it is commonly believed that these large branching ratios are due to the special properties of @xmath5 , and several new mechanisms have been proposed to enhance the decay rates of @xmath6 and @xmath7 . in the following
we only discuss the standard model(sm ) mechanisms because we think that the contribution of the sm should be carefully examined first .
halperin and zhitnisky @xcite proposed an interesting mechanism : @xmath5 can be directly produced through @xmath8 if @xmath9 .
but if this mechanism dominates , one easily find that @xmath10 which is in contradiction with the stringent upper limit of @xmath11 given by cleo @xcite : @xmath12 so this mechanism is unlikely to be dominant . because the effective vertex of @xmath13 in sm is very small , @xmath14 @xcite is also impossible to account for the large @xmath6 branching ratios .
the authors of ref @xcite proposed that @xmath15 and @xmath16 via qcd anomaly can account for the large semi - inclusive branching ratios of @xmath7 .
cleo @xcite have measured the @xmath5 momentum spectrum in @xmath7 and this measurement favors the mechanism of ref@xcite .
but because it has an extra gluon in the final state , unless the gluon is soft and absorbed into the @xmath5 wave functions @xcite , it seems difficult to realize its contribution to two - body exclusive decay @xmath6 .
motivated by the idea of ref @xcite , the authors of ref @xcite proposed di - gluon fusion mechanism , which is depicted in fig.1 .
because both of the gluons are hard , it seems reasonable to give a perturbative qcd estimation .
but because of our ignorance about the form factor of @xmath1 vertex , there are large uncertainties in calculations .
so in the following we would reanalyze di - gluon fusion mechanism in detail using several kinds of @xmath17 form factors and compare our numerical results with experimental data .
we first give a brief introduction on how to estimate contributions of di - gluon fusion mechanism in perturbative qcd .
@xmath18 vertex can be parameterized as @xcite : @xmath19 where @xmath20 is a constant and can be extracted from @xmath21 or @xmath22 , @xmath23 is qcd coupling constant , @xmath24 is @xmath17 form factor and @xmath25 . neglecting the transverse momentum of quarks and taking the wave functions for @xmath26 and @xmath27 meson as @xmath28 where @xmath29 is an identity in color space , and the integration of the distribution amplitude
is related to the meson decay constant , @xmath30 in this paper , we take the distribution amplitudes as@xcite : @xmath31 then we can write the amplitude of fig.1 as @xmath32 4 \epsilon^{\mu \nu \alpha \beta } k_{1\alpha } k_{2\beta } a_{\eta^{\prime } } f(k_1 ^ 2,k_2 ^ 2 ) c_f g_s^3 } { \sqrt{2 } \sqrt{2 } k_1 ^ 2 k_2 ^ 2 } \phi_k(y),\ ] ] where @xmath33 is the effective @xmath34 vertex@xcite @xmath35 and the color factor @xmath36\delta^{ab}=\frac{4}{3}$ ] .
finally we obtain @xmath37 + f_2^i m_b m_b[(q\cdot k_2 ) k_1 ^ 2-(q\cdot k_1)(k_1\cdot k_2 ) ] } { k_1 ^ 2 k_2 ^ 2 } .\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the above integral , there are two singularities from the gluon propagators and sometimes there would be another singularity from the @xmath38 form factor ( for example , @xmath39 ) .
we add a small pure imaginary number @xmath40 ( @xmath41 ) to the denominator to get a convergent integral . to evaluate the numerical result of eq.(10 ) , we take the form factors @xmath42 and @xmath43 according to ref@xcite as @xmath44 where @xmath45 are wilson coefficients at the nll level.(because qcd corrections maybe large , we do not take @xcite @xmath46 and @xmath47 which are derived from the sm without qcd corrections . )
it is always subtle to choose the scale of @xmath48 , because the average momenta squared of the gluons are @xmath49 we prefer to choose @xmath50 though we also give the branching ratios when @xmath51 or @xmath52 in tab.1 and tab.2 . as to the @xmath17 form factor @xmath24 ,
because of our complete ignorance there are large uncertainties in the numerical evaluation of eq.(10 ) . in the following we try several kinds of form factors . in ref@xcite
, the authors have assumed that @xmath53-dependence of the form factor is weak and as an approximation they take form factor as a constant to explain large semi - inclusive decay @xmath54 . the difference between ref@xcite and ref@xcite is that the running of @xmath55 with the scale is considered in @xcite but not in @xcite .
we also use their ansatz to estimate exclusive decays @xmath0 and @xmath2 . using eq.(10 ) , we give numerical results in tab.1 . from the table
it seems that the constant form factor can account for the large branching ratios of @xmath0 , but unfortunately we would get much larger branching ratios of @xmath2 , which is strongly in contradiction with the cleo s measurements@xcite ( see , for instance , the case of @xmath56 in tab.1 ) . from eq.(10 )
, we notice that the amplitude must be integrated over a wide range of @xmath57 and @xmath58 , therefore the effects of @xmath57 , @xmath58 dependence of @xmath24 must be taken into account .
the authors of ref@xcite choose the form factor as @xmath39 because such a form factor works well in @xmath59 @xcite .
we have followed their calculations and it seems that their numerical results are overestimated than ours(in tab.2 ) by a factor about three . from tab.2 , we can see that our estimations of @xmath60 are about @xmath3 , but when considering that the standard theoretical frame ( based on effective hamiltonian and general factorization approximation ) can give@xcite @xmath61 , it is still possible to account for the experimental data only if the contributions from di - gluon fusion mechanism and the standard theoretical frame constructively interfere . if this is true , then because the contributions to @xmath62 from the standard theoretical frame are negligible , the di - gluon fusion mechanism would be dominant in @xmath63 , _
i.e. _ , @xmath64 which can be tested by future measurements of cleo or b factories .
kagan and petrov @xcite proposed a model of the @xmath18 vertex in which a pseudoscalar current is coupled to two gluons through quark loops .
their perturbative calculations yield a form factor : @xmath65 where we take @xmath66 , @xmath67 and normalize @xmath24 with the normal condition @xmath25 .
we use this form factor in eq.(10 ) with @xmath56 and get @xmath68 which is too small to account for the experiments . in ref @xcite
, the authors calculate the transition form factor in @xmath69 coupling to @xmath70 in the frame of a perturbative qcd based on the modified factorization formula .
they find that numerically their results are extremely similar to that obtained by applying the interpolation procedure in the manner of brodsky and lepage in the case of two off - shell photons : @xmath71 with @xmath72 and @xmath73 .
we assume that the structure of the transition of @xmath74 is similar to that of @xmath75 : @xmath76 where we approximate @xmath77 . by using this form factor
, we calculate the branching ratios of @xmath0 which are listed in tab.3 .
the results are about fifty times smaller than the experimental data . in experimental fit
, pole approximation is often used to fit the momentum square dependence of form factor @xcite . as a try
, we also assume @xmath78 for our calculations , we list the results in tab.4 .
and we can see that this kind of form factor would make the digluon fusion mechanism completely negligible in @xmath6 .
to examine the validity of perturbative qcd in the above caculations , or in other words , whether the amplitude calculated by perturbative qcd is dominated by hard gluon contributions , we set cut on @xmath58 and compare the results with those without cut . taking @xmath79 , we list the numerical results in tab.v .
we can see that hard gluon contributions are really dominant in the case of constant form factor .
but if we take form factor as @xmath80 , hard gluon contributions are small , this does not mean that non - perturbative contributions are dominant in this case .
this is due to the fact that the singularity in the form factor is accidently close to the other singularities in @xmath57 and @xmath58 and then enhance the contributions of soft gluon .
the authors of ref @xcite proposed digluon fusion mechanism to explain the large branching ratios of @xmath6 , but because of our ignorance about effective @xmath1 vertex , there are large uncertainties in perturbative qcd estimations .
we try several kinds of @xmath38 form factors , and through our calculations , we find that constant form factor is consistent with the data of @xmath6 , but inconsistent with the data of @xmath81 in some cases of different @xmath48 or @xmath82 .
if we take @xmath80 as the authors of ref @xcite have done , di - gluon fusion mechanism is important in @xmath6 but not dominant . as a consequence
, we could anticipate that @xmath83 would be about @xmath3 which can be tested by future experiments .
we also try the other three kinds of form factors and they all give very small contributions to the branching ratios . we conclude that , though we know little about @xmath17 form factor , if di - gluon fusion mechanism is important in @xmath6 , the branching ratios of @xmath81 would be definitely around @xmath3 .
this work is supported in part by the national natural science foundation of china and the grant of china state commission of science and technology .
a. szczepaniak , e. henley and s. j. brodsky , phy.lett.b * 152 * , 380(1990 ) ; + c. e. carlson and j. milana , phys.rev.d * 49 * , 5908(1994 ) ; phys.lett.b * 301 * , 237(1993 ) ; + h. simma and d. wyler , phys.lett.b * 272 * , 395(1991 ) ; + c. d. l and d. x. zhang , phys.lett.b * 400 * , 188(1997 ) .
|
cleo collaboration improved measurements of @xmath0 branching ratios larger than estimations standard frame believed large branching ratios due to special properties @xmath5 new mechanisms proposed to enhance decay rates of @xmath6 @xmath7 discuss standard model(sm ) mechanisms contribution sm halperin zhitnisky proposed mechanism @xmath5 produced through @xmath8 @xmath9 if mechanism dominates @xmath10 contradiction with upper limit @xmath11 cleo @xcite unlikely dominant effective vertex of @xmath13 in sm small @xmath14 impossible account for large @xmath6 branching ratios authors of ref @xcite proposed @xmath15 and @xmath16 via qcd anomaly account for large branching ratios of @xmath7 measured @xmath5 momentum spectrum in @xmath7 favors mechanism ref@xcite extra gluon final state @xmath5 wave difficult to realize contribution to two - body decay @xmath6 authors proposed di - gluon fusion mechanism depicted in fig.1 both gluons hard reasonable to give perturbative qcd estimationignorance about form factor @xmath1 vertex large uncertainties in calculations reanalyze di - gluon fusion mechanism using @xmath17 form factors compare numerical results with experimental data introduction contributions di - gluon fusion in perturbative qcd @xmath18 vertex parameterized as @xcite : @xmath19 @xmath20 constant extracted from @xmath21 or @xmath22 @xmath23 qcd coupling constant @xmath24 @xmath17 form factor @xmath25 neglecting transverse momentum of quarks wave functions for @xmath26 and @xmath27 meson as @xmath28 @xmath29 identity in color space distribution amplitude related to meson decay constant @xmath30 distribution amplitudes as@xcite : @xmath31 write amplitude of fig.1 as @xmath32 4_2 @xmath33 effective @xmath34 vertex@xcite @xmath35 color factor @xmath36\delta^{ab=\frac{4}{3} obtain @xmath37 + f_2^i m_b k_2 k_1_2{aligned integral two singularities from gluon propagators another from @xmath38 form factor add small imaginary number @xmath40 @xmath41 to denominator convergent integral evaluate numerical result eq.(10 ) form factors @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 wilson coefficients at nll level qcd corrections take @xcite @xmath46 @xmath47 derived without qcd corrections choose scale @xmath48 average momenta squared gluons @xmath49 prefer @xmath50 branching ratios @xmath51 @xmath52 in tab.1 tab.2 @xmath17 form factor @xmath24 large uncertainties in numerical evaluation eq.(10 ) try several form factors ref@xcite authors @xmath53-dependence weak form factor as constant large semi - inclusive decay @xmath54 difference running of @xmath55 scale considered in @xcite not @xcite use ansatz estimate exclusive decays @xmath0 @xmath2 eq.(10 ) numerical results in tab.1constant form factor large branching ratios @xmath0 larger branching ratios @xmath2 contradiction with cleo s measurements@xcite case @xmath56 tab.1 eq.(10 ) amplitude integrated over @xmath57 @xmath58 effects of dependence @xmath24 authors ref@xcite choose form factor @xmath39 works well in @xmath59 calculations results overestimated.2 by factor three tab.2 estimations of @xmath60 about @xmath3 standard theoretical frame give @xmath61 possible account for experimental data if contributions from di - gluon fusion mechanism standard theoretical frame interfere contributions to @xmath62 standard theoretical frame negligible di - gluon fusion mechanism dominant in @xmath63 @xmath64 tested by future measurements cleo b factories kagan and petrov model @xmath18 vertex pseudoscalar current coupled to two gluons quark loops perturbative calculations yield form factor @xmath65 @xmath66 normalize @xmath24 with normal condition @xmath25 use form factor in eq.(10 ) with @xmath56 get @xmath68 too small to account for experiments@xcite authors calculate transition form factor @xmath69 to @xmath70 perturbative qcd modified factorization formula results similar to interpolation procedure brodsky and lepage two off - shell photons @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 assume structure transition @xmath74 similar to @xmath75 : @xmath76 approximate @xmath77 form factor calculate branching ratios of @xmath0 listed in tab.3 results fifty times smaller than experimental data pole approximation fit momentum square dependence of form factor @xcite assume @xmath78 calculations results in tab.4 form factor digluon fusion mechanism negligible in @xmath6 examine validity perturbative qcd amplitude hard gluon contributions set cut on @xmath58 compare results with without cut @xmath79 results in tab.v hard gluon contributions dominant constant form factor form factor @xmath80 hard gluon contributions small not non - perturbative contributions dominant due to singularity in form factor close to singularities @xmath57 and @xmath58 contributions soft gluonauthors @xcite proposed digluon fusion mechanism large branching ratios @xmath6 ignorance @xmath1 vertex large uncertainties in perturbative qcd estimations @xmath38 form factors constant form factor consistent with data @xmath6 inconsistent with @xmath81 @xmath48 or @xmath82 @xmath80 di - gluon fusion mechanism important in @xmath6 not dominant anticipate @xmath83 about @xmath3 future experiments other three form factors small contributions to branching ratios if di - gluon fusion mechanism important in @xmath6 branching ratios @xmath81 around @xmath3 work supported by national natural science foundation china grant china state commission of science and technology a szczepaniak henley brodsky.lett.b * 152 380(1990 ) carlson j milana phys.rev.d 49 5908(1994 ).lett.b 301 237(1993 ) h simma d wyler phys.lett.b 272 395(1991 ) l zhang phys.lett.b 400 188(1997 )
| 0.358832
| 2,565
| 1,354
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,661
|
we present results of a high - statistics study of scalar and pseudoscalar meson propagators in quenched qcd at two values of lattice spacing , @xmath0 and 5.9 , with clover - improved wilson fermions .
the study of the chiral limit is facilitated by the pole - shifting ansatz of the modified quenched approximation .
pseudoscalar masses and decay constants are determined as a function of quark mass and quenched chiral log effects are estimated .
a study of the flavor singlet @xmath1 hairpin diagram yields a precise determination of the @xmath1 mass insertion . the corresponding value of the quenched chiral log parameter @xmath2 is compared with the observed qcl effects .
removal of qcl effects from the scalar propagator allows a determination of the mass of the lowest lying isovector scalar @xmath3 meson .
|
the lowest order chiral lagrangian supplemented by the chiral symmetry breaking terms @xmath4 of o(@xmath5 ) and @xmath6 of o(@xmath7 ) ( which model the mass - dependence of the chiral slope for the meson decay constants ) is given by@xcite : .
@xmath8 where @xmath9 we use explicit formulas for the pseudoscalar masses , and pseudoscalar and axial vector decay constants , consistent through order @xmath10 ( for details see @xcite ) .
the coefficients @xmath11 follow the notation of gasser and leutwyler @xcite .
the expression for the pseudoscalar mass squared up to first order in the hairpin mass , @xmath12 and @xmath13 is : @xmath14 + \frac{1}{f^2}8 l_5 \chi_{ij } \delta \tilde{j}_{ij } \ }
\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath15 is a slope parameter , @xmath16 , @xmath17 and @xmath18 . here
@xmath19 and @xmath20 .
the loop integrals @xmath21 and @xmath22 are defined in @xcite . for the pseudoscalar decay constants : @xmath23 \nonumber \\ & & ~-~\frac{4}{f^2}l_{5}\delta \chi_{ij } [ ( \frac{\tilde{i}_{ij}}{2 } + i_{ij } ) - ( \tilde{j}_{ii}+\tilde{j}_{jj})]\ } \end{aligned}\ ] ] while for the axial vector decay constants : @xmath24 = 0.45 = 0.45 = 0.45 = 0.45 = 0.45 = 0.45 we study 350 configurations on a @xmath25 lattice with @xmath26 .
clover fermions ( @xmath27 ) and the mqa procedure@xcite was used .
we consider six @xmath28 values ( @xmath29 ) with @xmath30 .
the fits are shown in figures [ fig : diag]-[fig : ratio ] .
in the quenched theory the disconnected part of the eta prime correlator ( hairpin term ) has a double pole @xmath31 whose coefficient determines @xmath32 .
the correlator for @xmath33 and a double pole fit(@xmath34 and @xmath35 ) is shown in figure [ fig : etap ] .
the @xmath2 parameter is given by : @xmath36 = 0.42 as the quenched chiral limit is approached the isovector scalar correlator shows negative norm behaviour .
the correlators for the lightest and heaviest @xmath28 values are shown in figure [ fig : scalar ] .
properly accounting for the effects of the hairpin - pion bubble@xcite allows a good fit of the isovector scalar correlator for all quark masses .
one output is the ( @xmath37 ) mass .
using the mqa technique , meson properties ( masses and decay constants ) can be extracted with sufficient accuracy to allow a fit of higher order chiral parameters , @xmath4 and @xmath6 .
the physical results for @xmath38 ( @xmath39 gev @xmath40 ) are compared with our @xmath0 ( @xmath41
gev @xmath42 ) results@xcite .
the physical values of @xmath32 ( in gev ) extracted from the hairpin analysis ( at @xmath38 ) are @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 and @xmath48 for @xmath49 and @xmath50 gev respectively . extrapolating to @xmath51 we obtain @xmath52 . the corresponding value for @xmath0 is @xmath53 .
extracting @xmath37 and @xmath54 masses ( at @xmath55 ) from scalar and axial vector propagators gives @xmath56 and @xmath57 gev and @xmath58 and @xmath59 gev for @xmath38 and @xmath60 respectively .
the value for @xmath61 gev suggests that the observed @xmath62 resonance is a @xmath63 `` molecule '' and not an ordinary @xmath3 meson .
16 w. bardeen , a. duncan , e. eichten , and h. thacker , phys .
d62 ( 2000 ) 114505 .
j. gasser and h. leutwyler , nucl .
b250 ( 1985 ) 465 .
w. bardeen , a. duncan , e. eichten , and h. thacker , phys .
d57 ( 1998 ) 1633 ; phys .
d59 ( 1999 ) 014507 .
w. bardeen , a. duncan , e. eichten , n. isgur and h. thacker , phys . rev .
d * 65 * ( 2002 ) 014509 .
|
lowest order chiral lagrangian supplemented chiral symmetry terms @xmath4 @xmath6 model mass - dependence chiral slope meson decay constants given@xcite @xmath8 @xmath9 formulas pseudoscalar masses axial vector decay constants consistent order @xmath10 see @xcite coefficients @xmath11 follow notation gasser leutwyler @xcite expression pseudoscalar mass first order hairpin mass @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 + \frac{1}{f^2}8 l_5 \chi_{ij \delta \tilde{j}_{ij @xmath15 slope parameter @xmath16 @xmath19 @xmath20 loop integrals @xmath21 @xmath22 defined @xcite pseudoscalar decay constants @xmath23 \nonumber\frac{4}{f^2}l_{5}\delta \chi_{ij\tilde{i}_{ij}}}_ axial vector decay constants @xmath24 = 0.45 study 350 configurations @xmath25 lattice @xmath26clover fermions @xmath27 mqa procedure used consider six @xmath28 values @xmath30 fits shown figures quenched theory disconnected eta prime correlator double pole @xmath31 coefficient determines @xmath32 correlator @xmath33 double pole fit@xmath34 shown figure @xmath2 parameter @xmath36 = 0.42 quenched chiral limit approached isovector scalar correlator shows negative norm behaviour correlators lightest heaviest @xmath28 values shown figure accounting effects hairpin - pion bubble@xcite allows good fit isovector scalar correlator quark masses output @xmath37 ) mass mqa technique meson properties masses decay constants extracted fit higher order chiral parameters @xmath4 @xmath6 physical results @xmath38 compared with @xmath0 @xmath41 results@xcite physical values @xmath32 hairpin analysis @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 gev extrapolating @xmath51 obtain @xmath52 corresponding value @xmath0 @xmath53extracting @xmath37 masses from scalar propagators gives gev gev @xmath61 gev suggests @xmath62 resonance @xmath63 molecule not ordinary @xmath3 meson bardeen duncan e eichten h thacker phys . d62 ( 2000 ) 114505 gasser leutwyler nucl b250 ( 1985 ) 465 bardeen duncan eichten thacker phys . d57 ( 1998 ) 1633 d59 ( 1999 ) 014507 bardeen duncan eichten isgur thacker . d 65 ( 2002 ) 014509
| 0.178909
| 1,129
| 584
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,663
|
we consider the curves whose all normal planes are at the same distance from a fixed point and obtain some characterizations of them in the 3-dimensional euclidean space .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ keywords : curve , plane curve , distance , spherical curve , involute .
2000 mathematics subject classification : 53a04 . _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
|
beng - yen chen investigated the curves whose position vectors lie in their rectifying planes in the 3-dimensional euclidean space , @xcite .
these curves are called the rectifying curves which are not plane curves . they can be equivalently defined as the twisted curves whose osculating planes are at the same distance from a fixed point . here
we consider the curves whose all normal planes are at the same distance from a fixed point and obtain some characterizations of them in the 3-dimensional euclidean space .
we first review the results on the rectifying curves in the 3-dimensional euclidean space , @xcite .
let @xmath0 be a unit - speed curve with the position vector @xmath1 .
therefore @xmath2 is the natural parameter of @xmath0 .
frenet formulas follow as @xmath3 where@xmath4 and @xmath5 are frenet vectors and @xmath6 the curvature and @xmath7 the torsion of the curve.a rectifying curve can be defined by the equation @xmath8 by means of ( [ 11 ] ) we can write it as @xmath9 accordingly @xmath10 and so @xmath11integrating ( [ 14 ] ) we have @xmath12 where @xmath13is a constant . without loss the generality we can write ( [ 15 ] ) as @xmath14 where @xmath15 is a positive number.([12 ] ) , ( [ 14 ] ) and ( [ 16 ] ) imply that the position vector can be written as @xmath16differentiating ( [ 17 ] ) we have@xmath17and so@xmath18this implies that a rectifying curve is a twisted curve , that is @xmath19on the other hand , from ( [ 17 ] ) we have@xmath20so if a curve is a rectifying curve , then its osculating planes are at the same distance from the origin .
conversely , let us assume that osculating planes of a twisted curve are at the same distance from the origin . differentiating ( [ 19 ] ) we get ( [ 12 ] ) and so it is a rectifying curve .
therefore we have the following property : _ a twisted curve is a rectifying curve if and only if its osculating planes are at the same distance from a fixed point . _ on the other hand , if a unit spherical curve @xmath21 is defined by the equation @xmath22 where @xmath23 is the position vector of a rectifying curve @xmath24 with the natural parameter @xmath2 , it can be show that the position vector of a rectifying curve @xmath0 can be represented as @xmath25 where @xmath26is the natural parameter of the spherical curve @xmath27 then the tangent unit vector of the curve @xmath0 can be written as @xmath28 where @xmath29 is the tangent unit vector of the spherical curve @xmath30differentiating the last equation we have @xmath31 @xmath32 is the curvature of the spherical curve @xmath27from ( [ 23 ] ) we find the following relation between the curvatures of the curves @xmath33and @xmath21 associated with each other : @xmath34the last relation can be written , in terms of the natural parameter @xmath2 of the rectifying curve , as @xmath35
let us assume that all normal planes of a curve @xmath0 with the position vector@xmath36 * * * * are at the same distance from a fixed point where @xmath2 is the natural parameter of @xmath0 .
we denote frenet vectors and the curvature and the torsion of @xmath0 by @xmath37 and @xmath5 and @xmath6 and @xmath7 respectively .
we can choose the fixed point as the origin .
therefore our condition becomes @xmath38 by the integration we find that @xmath39 where @xmath40 is a constant.since the case of @xmath41 corresponds to a spherical curve , we can assume that @xmath42 .
then , without loss the generality , we can write ( [ 32 ] ) as @xmath43 where @xmath44 is a positive constant
. then ( [ 31 ] ) reduces to @xmath45 ( [ 33 ] ) and ( [ 34 ] ) imply @xmath46differentiating ( [ 34 ] ) we have @xmath47 or @xmath48 where @xmath49 is the radius of curvature.from ( [ 34 ] ) and ( [ 37 ] ) we can write the position vector as @xmath50differentiating ( [ 38 ] ) we have @xmath51 and @xmath52 therefore we first have@xmath53so the curve is a plane curve if and only if @xmath54without the generality , for case of a plane curve we can write@xmath55then from ( [ 33 ] ) and ( [ 401 ] ) @xmath56accordingly the natural equations of the curve are @xmath57 we can now assume that our curve is a twisted curve , that is @xmath58 .
then@xmath59where @xmath60is the radius of torsion .
hence ( [ 38 ] ) can be written as@xmath61therefore , according to ( [ 33 ] ) we have@xmath62on the other hand , from ( [ 402 ] ) we can write@xmath63we can show that ( [ 311 ] ) and ( [ 312 ] ) are equivalent equations .
in fact , the equation ( [ 312 ] ) can be written as @xmath64[rr^{\prime } -2\epsilon c^{2}]=0 \label{313}\ ] ] because of @xmath65 , corresponds to the plane curve .
then we have @xmath66r^{\prime } t+4c^{4}\kappa t(\kappa t)^{\prime } -2\epsilon c^{2}\kappa t(r^{\prime } t)^{\prime } \]]and@xmath67\]]this implies that@xmath68^{\prime } \label{314}\]]therefore we have@xmath69it is obvious that using the equation ( [ 311 ] ) we obtain the equation ( [ 312 ] ) .
let us define a unit spherical curve @xmath21 by the equation @xmath70 where @xmath71 is the position vector of a curve with normal planes at constant distance from a fixed point.so we have @xmath72 differentiating we get @xmath73 from the last equation we find @xmath74 for the speed of the spherical curve . and
so the natural parameter of the unit spherical curve@xmath75 , from @xmath76 is obtained as @xmath77 since @xmath78 there exists a function @xmath79 which satisfies the equation ( [ 44 ] ) therefore ( [ 41 ] ) can be written as @xmath80 so for a given curve @xmath0 with normal planes at constant distance from a fixed point , whose position vector is@xmath81 , we have a unit spherical curve @xmath21 whose position vector @xmath82 is defined by ( [ 46 ] ) with the natural parameter @xmath83 .
we call @xmath84the unit spherical curve associated with the curve @xmath0 with normal planes at constant distance from a fixed point
. now let us consider a curve @xmath0 defined by @xmath85 where@xmath86 is the position vector of a unit spherical curve @xmath84with the natural parameter @xmath83 and @xmath79 is defined by ( [ 44 ] ) and @xmath44 is constant .
let @xmath87 and @xmath32 and@xmath88 be frenet vectors and the curvature and the torsion of @xmath21 respectively.according to ( [ 44 ] ) @xmath89 differentiating ( [ 47 ] ) with respect to @xmath83 we have @xmath90 since @xmath91 and @xmath92 from ( [ 49 ] ) we have @xmath93 so the unit tangent vector of @xmath0 is found as @xmath94 since @xmath95and @xmath96 @xmath97 this means that the curve @xmath0 is a curve with normal planes at constant distance from a fixed point .
we call @xmath33the curve with normal planes at constant distance from a fixed point associated with the unit spherical curve @xmath21.let us now differentiate ( [ 410 ] ) with respect to@xmath98 .
we have @xmath99 using * * * * @xmath100 @xmath101 and @xmath102 , from ( [ 412 ] ) we obtain the following relation between curvatures of the curves @xmath0 and @xmath21 associated with each other : @xmath103 or@xmath104since @xmath105the curvature of the unit spherical curve is not smaller than @xmath106that is @xmath107 the equation ( [ 4131 ] ) implies that the curvature of the unit spherical curve associated with the plane curve given by the natural equations ( 404 ) is @xmath108 this means that the spherical curve is a great circle of the unit sphere . hence we can obtain the cartesian equations of the plane curve associated with a great circle of the unit sphere using the equation ( [ 42 ] ) .
in fact , we can choose the equation of a great circle of the unit sphere as @xmath109since @xmath110@xmath111and@xmath112then from ( [ 42 ] ) we obtain the cartesian equations of the plane curve with normal planes at constant distance from the origin as@xmath113this curve is a plane curve with normal planes at a distance @xmath114 from the origin .
this means that all normal lines of the curve are at a distance @xmath115 from the origin .
so it is an involute of the circle of radius @xmath116 centered at the origin .
since it is an involute of a plane curve , it is also a plane curve ( * ? ? ?
in fact , the position vector of an involute @xmath0 of the curve @xmath117 whose position vector is@xmath118can be written as@xmath119where @xmath120is constant and @xmath121 is unit tangent vector to the curve @xmath117 , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite .
then@xmath122where @xmath123 is the curvature of @xmath117 and @xmath124 the principal normal vector .
therefore the unit tangent vector t to @xmath0 can be written as @xmath125since @xmath117 is a circle of radius @xmath114 centered at the origin,@xmath126@xmath127@xmath128so@xmath129 , @xmath130 . then from ( [ 3850 ] ) and
( [ 3851 ] ) we have @xmath131this means that the involute @xmath0 of the circle @xmath117 is a plane curve with normal planes at a distance @xmath114 from the origin .
figure 1 illustrates the plane curve ( [ 385 ] ) with normal planes at a distance @xmath132 from the origin ( the solid line for @xmath133 , the dashed line for @xmath134 ) .
it is an involute of the circle of radius @xmath135 centered at the origin.let us note the equations ( [ 385 ] ) can be also obtained using the equations ( [ 3850])-([3852 ] ) or using ( [ 385 ] ) from the equations of a plane curve given by@xmath136where @xmath2 is the natural parameter of the curve , @xcite , 3 , @xcite . in the following we give an example of a twisted curve with normal planes at constant distance from a fixed point .
let us choose the unit spherical curve @xmath21 as the circle of radius @xmath137 given by the equation @xmath138 then the curve @xmath0 associated with @xmath21 is given by the equation@xmath139where @xmath140since the curvature of the circle @xmath21 is @xmath141(4131 ) implies that@xmath142figure @xmath143 illustrates the twisted curve ( [ 4141 ] ) with normal planes at a distance @xmath132 from the origin ( the solid line for @xmath144 , the dashed line for @xmath134 ) .
if @xmath145constant , ( [ 403 ] ) reduce to@xmath146from ( [ 4151 ] ) we have @xmath147constant .
this means that rectifying planes of a curve of constant curvature with normal planes at constant distance from a fixed point are also at constant distance from the same point .
|
beng - yen chen investigated curves position vectors in rectifying planes in 3-dimensional euclidean space curves rectifying curves not plane curves defined as twisted curves osculating planes same distance from fixed point consider curves normal planes same distance from fixed point obtain characterizations in 3-dimensional euclidean space review results on rectifying curves in @xmath0 unit - speed curve with position vector @xmath1 @xmath2 is natural parameter of @xmath0 frenet formulas follow as @xmath3@xmath4 @xmath5 are frenet vectors @xmath6 curvature @xmath7 torsion of curve rectifying curve defined by equation @xmath8 write as @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11integrating @xmath12 where @xmath13is constant write as @xmath14 where @xmath15 is positive number position vector written as @xmath16differentiating@xmath17and@xmath18this implies rectifying curve is twisted curve if rectifying curve osculating planes same distance from origin conversely osculating planes of twisted curve same distance from origindifferentiating ( [ 19 ] ) ( [ 12 ] ) rectifying curve property twisted curve rectifying if osculating planes same distance from fixed point unit spherical curve @xmath21 defined by equation @xmath22 @xmath23 position vector rectifying curve @xmath24 natural parameter @xmath2 position vector @xmath0 represented as @xmath25 @xmath26is natural parameter spherical curve @xmath27 tangent unit vector curve @xmath0 @xmath28 @xmath29 tangent unit vector spherical curve @xmath30differentiating equation @xmath31 @xmath32 curvature of spherical curve @xmath27from 23 ] relation between curvatures curves @xmath33and @xmath21 relation written @xmath35 normal planes curve @xmath0 position vector@xmath36 same distance from fixed point @xmath2 natural parameter @xmath0 denote frenet vectors curvature torsion @xmath0 by @xmath37 @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 choose fixed point origin condition becomes @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 constant @xmath41 corresponds spherical curve assume @xmath42without generality write [ 32 ] ) @xmath43 @xmath44 positive constant ( [ 31 ] ) reduces to @xmath45 ( [ 33 ] ) 34 ] ) imply @xmath46differentiating [ 34 ] ) @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 radius curvature [ 34 ] ) [ 37 ] ) write position vector [ 38 ] ) @xmath51 @xmath52 have curve plane @xmath54without write [ 33 ] ) 401 ] ) natural equations curve @xmath57 curve twisted curve @xmath58 @xmath60is radius of torsion ( [ 38 ] ) written as [ 33 ] ) have ( [ 402 ] ) write ( [ 311 ] ) [ 312 ] ) equivalent equations equation ( [ 312 ] ) written @xmath64 @xmath65 corresponds plane curve@xmath66r t+4c^{4{2@xmath67 implies@xmath68\prime{314} equation ( [ 311 ] equation ( [ 312 ] ) define unit spherical curve @xmath21 @xmath70 @xmath71 position vector curve normal planes constant distance fixed point @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 speed spherical curve natural parameter spherical curve@xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 function @xmath79 satisfies equation [ 44 ] ) ( [ 41 ] ) @xmath80 curve @xmath0 normal planes constant distance fixed point position vector@xmath81 unit spherical curve @xmath21 position vector @xmath82 defined [ 46 ] ) natural parameter @xmath83 unit spherical curve curve @xmath0 normal planes constant distance fixed point curve @xmath0 defined @xmath85@xmath86 position vector unit spherical curve natural parameter @xmath83 @xmath79 defined ( [ 44 ] ) @xmath44 constant @xmath87 @xmath32@xmath88 frenet vectors curvature torsion @xmath21[ 44 ] @xmath89 differentiating ( [ 47 ] ) @xmath83 @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 [ 49 ] ) @xmath93 unit tangent vector @xmath0 @xmath94 @xmath96 @xmath97 curve @xmath0 normal planes constant distance fixed point curve normal planes constant distance point unit spherical curve @xmath21 differentiate [ 410 ] )@xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 [ 412 ] ) relation curvatures curves @xmath0 @xmath21 @xmath103@xmath104since curvature unit spherical curve not smaller @xmath107 equation ( [ 4131 ] ) implies curvature unit spherical curve plane curve equations ( 404 ) @xmath108 spherical curve great circle unit sphere cartesian equations plane curve great circle sphere equation ( [ 42 ] ) equation great circle @xmath109since @xmath110 [ 42 ] ) cartesian equations plane curve normal planes constant distance origin normal planes distance @xmath114 from origin normal lines distance @xmath115 from origininvolute circle radius @xmath116 centered origin involute plane curve plane curve position vector involute @xmath0 curve @xmath117 position vector@xmath118can written@xmath119where @xmath120is constant @xmath121 unit tangent vector curve @xmath117@xmath122where @xmath123 curvature @xmath117 @xmath124 principal normal vector unit tangent vector t @xmath0 written @xmath117 circle radius @xmath114 centered origin@xmath126@xmath127@xmath128so@xmath129 @xmath130 @xmath131this involute @xmath0 circle @xmath117 plane curve normal planes distance @xmath114 from origin figure 1 plane curve 385 normal planes distance @xmath132 from origin solid line @xmath133 dashed line @xmath134 involute circle radius @xmath135 centered origin equations 385 ) obtained equations ( [ 3850])-([3852 ] ) [ 385 ) equations plane curve@xmath136where @xmath2 natural parameter curve @xcite , 3 @xcite example twisted curve normal planes constant distance fixed pointchoose spherical curve @xmath21 circle radius @xmath137 equation @xmath138 curve @xmath0 @xmath21 equation curvature circle @xmath141(4131 implies@xmath142figure @xmath143 illustrates twisted curve 4141 normal planes distance @xmath132 from origin solid line @xmath144 dashed line @xmath134 @xmath145constant reduce@xmath146from 4151 @xmath147constant rectifying planes curve constant curvature normal planes constant distance fixed point constant distance same point
| 0.429142
| 2,846
| 1,485
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,665
|
we discuss exclusive vector meson electroproduction within the qcd collinear factorization framework . in bjorken kinematics
the amplitude factorizes in a convolution of the nonperturbative meson distribution amplitude and the generalized parton densities with the perturbatively calculable hard - scattering amplitudes , which are presently known to next - to - leading order ( nlo ) . at small @xmath0 nlo corrections
are very large .
it is related to appearance of bfkl type logarithms in the hard - scattering amplitudes , that calls for a resummation of these effects at higher orders .
here we report the first results of such resummation .
|
the process of elastic vector meson electroproduction on a nucleon , @xmath1 where @xmath2 , was studied in many fix target and in hera collider experiments . on the theoretical side
, the large negative virtuality of the photon , @xmath3 , provides a hard scale for the process which justifies the application of qcd factorization methods that allow to separate the contributions to the amplitude coming from different scales .
the factorization theorem @xcite states that in a scaling limit , @xmath4 and @xmath5 fixed , a vector meson is produced in the longitudinally polarized state by the longitudinally polarized photon and that the amplitude of the process ( [ process ] ) is given by a convolution of the perturbatively calculable hard - scattering amplitudes @xmath6 , the nonperturbative meson distribution amplitude ( da ) @xmath7 , and the generalized parton densities ( gpds ) @xmath8 .
@xmath9 where @xmath10 is the skewness variable , @xmath11 and @xmath12 is a factorization scale .
gpds encode important information on hadron structure , including aspects that can not be deduced directly from experiment , like the transverse spatial distribution of partons and their orbital angular momentum , for more details see @xcite . deeply virtual compton process ( dvcs )
provides the theoretically cleanest access to gpds .
recently two - loop effects were incorporated into the analysis of dvcs @xcite . a theoretical description of exclusive meson production is more involved since it includes an additional nonperturbative quantity , a meson da .
the primary motivation for the strong interest in this process ( and in the similar process of heavy quarkonium production ) is that it can serve to constrain the gluon density in a nucleon .
indeed , in vector meson production case the gluon gpd enters the description already at the leading order ( lo ) in the strong coupling @xmath13 , whereas in dvcs it appears first at nlo , and , like in inclusive dis , is accessible only through scaling violation .
the hard - scattering amplitudes for process ( [ process ] ) were calculated at nlo in @xcite , and for exclusive heavy quarkonium photoproduction in @xcite .
the analysis of nlo effects showed that in kinematics typical for the hera collider experiments , @xmath14 , the nlo corrections are huge even for really large values of hard scales @xmath15 .
if the factorization scale is chosen close to the value of a hard scale , @xmath16 , the corrections have opposite signs in comparison to the born term . which may lead to the change of signs of the imaginary and the real parts of the amplitude within phenomenologically relevant interval of @xmath17 .
besides , the factorization and renormalization scale uncertainties were found being very large .
recently these findings were confirmed in @xcite , where very detailed analysis of the cross sections and the transverse target polarization asymmetries in exclusive meson production was performed both for small and larger values of @xmath17 , typical for fixed - target experiments . for the fixed target kinematics
it seems that nlo corrections start to be under control , though their values are still large at presently available values of @xmath18 . for the transverse target polarization
asymmetries the situation is better , in some cases .
going back to small @xmath17 , why nlo corrections are large in this case ?
the inspection of nlo hard - scattering amplitudes shows that the imaginary part of the amplitude dominates and that the leading contribution to the nlo correction originates from the broad integration region @xmath19 , where the gluonic part approximates ( @xmath20 is a number of colors ) @xmath21 \ , .
\label{appr}\ ] ] given the behavior of the gluon gpd at small @xmath22 , @xmath23 , we see that nlo correction is parametrically large , @xmath24 , and negative unless one chooses the value of the factorization scale sufficiently lower than the kinematic scale . for the asymptotic form of meson da , @xmath25 , the last term in ( [ appr ] )
changes the sign at @xmath26 , for the da with a more broad shape this happens at even lower values of @xmath12 .
similar , @xmath27 enhanced , contribution appears also in the quark singlet channel .
the partonic momentum fraction @xmath22 is related to the mandelstam energy variable @xmath28 of the partonic subprocess @xmath29 .
the leading part of nlo partonic amplitude ( proper normalized ) grows as the first power of energy , @xmath30 , whereas at lo partonic amplitude behaves like a constant at large @xmath28 .
the reason for this difference is the appearance , starting from nlo , of partonic diagrams with the gluon exchange in the @xmath31 channel , see fig .
1 . at lo one has only diagrams with the quark exchange , both for the gluon and quark channels . at higher orders the diagrams with gluon @xmath31 channel exchange give contributions to the amplitudes of partonic subprocesses enhanced , for @xmath32 loops , as @xmath33 . in its turn
, these terms inserted in the factorization formula will produce large contributions @xmath34 to the process amplitude , where each power of the strong coupling is compensated by the same power of a large logarithm of energy .
it is a natural idea to resum these enhanced at small @xmath17 contributions using the bfkl approach @xcite .
the central point in this high energy resummation is to perform it consistently , without spoiling the all - order factorization of collinear singularities .
a care should be taken of the factorization scheme used at the factorization of the process amplitude ( [ factor ] ) in terms of gpds and hard - scattering amplitudes .
the higher order terms of the hard - scattering amplitudes derived within the high energy approximation ( bfkl approach ) can be supplemented by the knowledge of hard - scattering amplitudes calculated exactly at fixed order .
then , one can use them together in factorization formula ( [ factor ] ) without double counting . for inclusive hard processes ,
heavy quark production and dis , the method of such high energy resummation was elaborated in @xcite .
it is based on curci , furmanski and petronzio approach @xcite to separation of collinear singularities .
the amplitudes on a parton ( quark , gluon ) target are considered in @xmath35 non - integer dimentions .
that separates automatically the leading twist .
collinear singularities appear in this approach as @xmath36 poles , these poles are absorbed into a definition of parton densities .
another essential ingredients of @xcite method is an analysis of mellin moments , high - energy terms in mellin moment space @xmath37 look like singularities @xmath38 at @xmath39 , and a consideration of bfkl equation in @xmath35 dimensions .
we found that this technique may be directly generalized on the analysis of exclusive non - forward reactions .
below we present the first results of this study . like in dis the imaginary part of the a amplitude
is given by the sum of quark singlet and gluon contributions @xmath40 \ , .\ ] ] @xmath41 and @xmath42 are the imaginary parts of the quark and gluon hard - scattering amplitudes . in difference to forward dis case the parton densities in ( [ ampl ] ) depend on both longitudinal momentum fractions . due to that the mellin moments of the amplitude do not factorize into the product of the moments @xmath43 \ , . & \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] using polynomiality property of gpds , in particular for the gluon case @xmath44 one can show that for the integer odd @xmath37 @xmath45 \ , .\ ] ] which is a sum of moment products ( not just a product , as in dis case )
. one can analytically continue ( [ dn ] ) from the integer odd @xmath37 into entire complex @xmath37 plane
. the high energy asymptotic of the amplitude is related with the behavior of @xmath46 near unphysical point @xmath39 .
one can split ( [ dn ] ) into a sum of the singular and the regular at @xmath39 parts @xmath47 the singularities of the sum ( [ dn ] ) at @xmath39 are due to @xmath48 term only .
therefore @xmath49 note that at @xmath50 , @xmath51 @xmath52 reduce to the moments of usual parton densities @xmath53 this consideration shows that a non - forward nature of hard exclusive reactions does not complicate much their analysis in the high energy limit .
therefore the method used in dis @xcite may be applied here . the difference between dis and
our case is in the different form of @xmath54 dependent amplitudes for corresponding partonic subprocesses .
below i will concentrate on the dominant at high energy gluon contribution .
the results will be presented for the process ( [ process ] ) ( assuming for simplicity the asymptotic form of meson da ) and for the process of heavy quarkonium electroproduction ( where the formation of quarkonium is treated in nrqcd ) . the amplitude is presented as follows @xmath55 here @xmath56 , we omitted normalization factors irrelevant for the subsequent discussion , in the r.h.s @xmath57 represents the born contribution and the sum stands for the high energy terms .
@xmath58 are the polynomials of variable @xmath59 which we need to calculate .
note that the born term belongs to the regular part ( in terms of ( [ dn ] ) ) , whereas the high energy terms behave as @xmath60 at @xmath39 .
therefore in the high energy terms one can replace gluon gpd in ( [ forcalc ] ) by its forward limit , @xmath61 , but in the born contribution @xmath57 should be kept different from @xmath62 . omitting all details of the derivation we just present the results .
we work in @xmath63 scheme .
we define ( properly normalized ) @xmath54 dependent amplitude of the gluon subprocess @xmath64 then we calculate its mellin transform @xmath65\gamma[1-\gamma]}{\gamma[2 + 2\gamma]}\ , .\ ] ] the high energy terms are defined from the expression @xmath66 the gluon anomalous dimension is determined by the solution of equation @xmath67 , where @xmath68 is the bfkl eigenfunction , function @xmath69 depends on @xmath70 and is defined in @xcite .
expanding @xmath71 in the series of variable @xmath72 one can obtain analytical expressions for the polynomials @xmath58 .
below we illustrate the values of these polynomials for the case @xmath73 @xmath74 here the first two lines represent results for the exclusive light vector meson and quarkonium production respectively , in the third line we show for comparison the results for longitudinal dis structure function @xcite .
we see that numerical values of @xmath75 are negative in all case , but for the exclusive reactions its absolute values are about @xmath76 times larger then in the case of @xmath77 , explaining very large negative nlo corrections found for exclusive meson production . on the other hand ,
the values of the second polynomial are positive and large , @xmath78 for the light vector meson production .
this gives a hope that inclusion of these high energy terms in the analysis may stabilize predictions for exclusive meson production . to investigate this possibility we perform the following numerical study .
we calculate the amplitude of light vector meson production with ( [ forcalc ] ) , where in the high energy terms we use very simple input for the gluon density @xmath79 , for the born term we take @xmath80 .
definitely , more realistic input for gluon gpd should be used ( especially for @xmath57 ) , but at the present stage we just want to clarify the qualitative role of the high energy terms . in fig .
2 we present the energy dependence of the amplitude ( in arbitrary units ) calculated for two values of photon virtuality @xmath81 and @xmath82 , for the running coupling we use @xmath83 and @xmath84 , and for the factorization scale @xmath85 .
the solid line on fig .
2 represents the born contribution , the dashed line
the born @xmath86 the first high energy term , the dotted line the born @xmath86 2 first high energy terms , the dashed - dotted the born @xmath86 6 first high energy terms . [ cols="^,^ " , ] the dependence of the amplitude on the choice of factorization scale is shown in fig .
, the dashed lines correspond to the born @xmath86 the first high energy term , the dashed - dotted lines the born @xmath86 6 first high energy terms .
the upper dashed and dashed - dotted lines are for @xmath87 , the lower dashed and dashed - dotted lines are for @xmath85 .
we observe sizable reduction of the factorization scale dependence if the high energy terms are resummed in comparison to the case when only the first of these terms is taken into account .
large nlo corrections are found for hard exclusive vector meson production . at intermediate to larger values of @xmath17 , typical for fixed - target experiments , it seems that nlo corrections start to be under control for the large values of @xmath18 , say above @xmath88 .
however , the situation is much worse for the region of small @xmath17 , typical for the hera collider experiments . here
nlo corrections are not under control even for such large values of hard scales as @xmath89 , which prevents the interpretation of the precise hera data in terms of gpds .
the problem is related to appearance of bfkl type logarithms in the hard - scattering amplitudes , that calls for a resummation of these effects at higher orders . here
we present the first results for such study .
the methods used earlier for forward dis process may be generalized to the case of nonforward hard exclusive reactions .
we obtained analitical results for the corresponding high energy terms in ( [ forcalc ] ) .
the first numerical calculation incorporating the high energy resummation is encouraging .
_ i am very grateful to the organizers and to alexander von humboldt foundation for the support of my participation in eds07 conference .
this work is also sponsored in part by grants rfbr-06 - 02 - 16064 and nsh 5362.2006.2 . _
|
elastic vector meson electroproduction on nucleon @xmath1 studied in fix target hera collider experiments large negative virtuality of photon @xmath3 provides hard scale justifies qcd factorization methods contributions to amplitude from different scales factorization theorem @xcite states in scaling limit @xmath4 vector meson produced in longitudinally polarized state by photon amplitude given by convolution calculable hard - scattering amplitudes @xmath6 nonperturbative meson distribution amplitude @xmath7 generalized parton densities gpds @xmath8 @xmath9 skewness variable @xmath11 @xmath12 factorization scale gpds encode information on hadron structure transverse spatial distribution of partons orbital angular momentum deeply virtual compton process dvcs ) provides cleanest access to gpds two - loop effects incorporated into analysis dvcs theoretical description exclusive meson production involved includes additional nonperturbative quantity meson da primary motivation gluon density in nucleonvector meson production gluon gpd enters description leading order in strong coupling @xmath13 in dvcs appears first at nlo accessible through scaling violation hard - scattering amplitudes for process calculated at nlo @xcite heavy quarkonium photoproduction @xcite analysis nlo effects hera collider experiments nlo corrections huge for large values hard scales @xmath15 if factorization scale chosen close to hard scale corrections have opposite signs to change signs imaginary real parts amplitude factorization renormalization scale uncertainties large findings confirmed in @xcite detailed analysis of cross sections transverse target polarization asymmetries in exclusive meson production performed for small larger values @xmath17 fixed - target experiments fixed target kinematics nlo corrections under control values large at values @xmath18 transverse target polarization asymmetries better @xmath17 nlo corrections large nlo hard - scattering amplitudes imaginary part amplitude dominates leading contribution nlo correction from broad integration region @xmath19 gluonic part approximates @xmath21behavior gluon gpd at small @xmath22 nlo correction large @xmath24 negative unless factorization scale lower than kinematic scale asymptotic form meson da @xmath25 last term changes sign at @xmath26 broad shape lower values @xmath12 similar @xmath27 contribution in quark singlet channel partonic momentum @xmath22 related to mandelstam energy variable @xmath28 partonic subprocess @xmath29 nlo partonic amplitude grows as first power energy @xmath30 lo constant at large @xmath28 difference appearance partonic diagrams with gluon exchange in @xmath31 channel fig . 1 lo diagrams with quark exchange gluon quark channels higher orders diagrams with gluon @xmath31 channel exchange amplitudes partonic subprocesses @xmath32 @xmath33 terms factorization formula large contributions @xmath34 to process amplitude power strong coupling compensated by power large logarithm energy resum enhanced small @xmath17 contributions using bfkl approach high energy perform consistently without spoiling all - order factorization of collinear singularitiescare factorization scheme process amplitude in gpds hard - scattering amplitudes higher order terms - scattering high energy approximation supplemented by hard - scattering amplitudes fixed order use together in factorization formula without double counting hard processes heavy quark production method high energy resummation elaborated in @xcite based on curci furmanski petronzio approach separation of collinear singularities amplitudes on parton quark gluon target considered in @xmath35 non - integer dimentions separates leading twist collinear singularities appear as @xmath36 poles absorbed into definition parton densities essential method analysis of mellin moments high - energy terms in space consideration of bfkl equation in @xmath35 dimensions technique generalized on analysis non - forward reactions first results study imaginary part amplitude by sum of quark singlet gluon contributions @xmath41 @xmath42 imaginary parts quark gluon hard - scattering amplitudes parton densities depend on longitudinal momentum fractions mellin moments not factorize into product moments @xmath43\nonumber{aligned using polynomiality property gpds gluon case @xmath44 show integer odd @xmath37 @xmath45 sum of moment products not analytically continue ( dn ] ) from integer odd @xmath37 into complex @xmath37 plane high energy asymptotic amplitude related with behavior @xmath46 unphysical point @xmath39 split dn ] ) into sum singular regular @xmath39 parts @xmath47 singularities sum dn @xmath39 due to @xmath48 term @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 reduce to moments usual parton densities @xmath53 non - forward nature hard exclusive reactions complicate analysis high energy limit method dis @xcite applied difference different form @xmath54 dependent amplitudes for partonic subprocesses concentrate on dominant high energy gluon contribution results presented for process asymptotic form meson heavy quarkonium electroproduction nrqcd amplitude presented @xmath55 @xmath56 omitted normalization factors @xmath57 represents born contribution sum high energy terms @xmath58 polynomials of variable @xmath59 calculateborn term regular part high energy terms as @xmath60 @xmath39 replace gluon gpd by forward limit @xmath61 born contribution @xmath57 different from @xmath62 present results work in @xmath63 scheme define @xmath54 dependent amplitude gluon subprocess @xmath64 calculate mellin transform @xmath65\gamma[1-\gamma[2 + 2 high energy terms defined from expression @xmath66 gluon anomalous dimension determined by solution equation @xmath67 @xmath68 bfkl eigenfunction @xmath69 depends on @xmath70 defined in @xcite expanding @xmath71 variable @xmath72 analytical expressions for polynomials @xmath58 illustrate values polynomials @xmath73 @xmath74 first two lines results light vector meson quarkonium production third results longitudinal dis structure function @xcite numerical values of @xmath75 negative exclusive reactions values @xmath76 times larger @xmath77 large negative nlo corrections for exclusive meson production values second polynomial positive large @xmath78 for light vector meson production inclusion high energy terms stabilize predictions for exclusive meson production numerical studycalculate amplitude light vector meson production with forcalc ] ) high energy terms simple input gluon density @xmath79 born term @xmath80 realistic input gluon gpd especially @xmath57 clarify qualitative role high energy terms fig . 2 energy dependence amplitude for photon virtuality @xmath81 @xmath82 running coupling @xmath83 @xmath84 factorization scale @xmath85 solid line represents born contribution dashed line born @xmath86 first high energy term dotted line born @xmath86 2 first high energy terms dashed - dotted born @xmath86 6 first high energy terms dependence amplitude on factorization scale shown fig . dashed lines born @xmath86 first high energy term - dotted born @xmath86 6 first high energy terms upper @xmath87 lower @xmath85 reduction factorization scale dependence if high energy terms resummed first large nlo corrections for hard exclusive vector meson production intermediate to larger values @xmath17 nlo corrections under control for large values @xmath18 above @xmath88 worse for region small @xmath17 hera collider experimentsnlo corrections control large values @xmath89 prevents interpretation precise hera data gpds problem related bfkl logarithms hard - scattering amplitudes resummation higher orders present first results study methods forward dis process generalized nonforward hard reactions obtained analitical results high energy terms forcalc ] first numerical calculation high energy resummation encouraging grateful to organizers alexander von humboldt foundation support participation eds07 conference work sponsored by grants rfbr-06 - 02 - 16064 nsh 5362.2006.2
| 0.507466
| 3,184
| 1,659
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,717
|
we analyze the chiral restoration and deconfinement transitions in the framework of a non - local chiral quark model which includes terms leading to the quark wave function renormalization , and takes care of the effect of gauge interactions by coupling the quarks with the polyakov loop .
non - local interactions are described by considering both a set of exponential form factors , and a set of form factors obtained from a fit to the mass and renormalization functions obtained in lattice calculations .
|
the detailed understanding of the behavior of strongly interacting matter under extreme conditions of temperature and/or density has become an issue of great interest in recent years . unfortunately , even if a significant progress has been made on the development of ab initio calculations such as lattice qcd , these are not yet able to provide a full understanding of the qcd phase diagram and the related hadron properties , due to the well - known difficulties of dealing with small current quark masses and finite chemical potentials .
thus it is important to develop effective models that show consistency with lattice results and can be extrapolated into regions not accessible by lattice calculation techniques .
recently , models in which quark fields interact via local four point vertices and where the polyakov loop is introduced to account for the confinement - deconfinement phase transition ( so - called polyakov - nambu - jona - lasinio ( pnjl ) models @xcite ) have received considerable attention . here , we consider a non - local extension of these pnjl models , which includes terms leading to the quark wave function renormalization .
two different parameterizations are used : an exponential form , and a parametrization based on a fit to the mass and renormalization function obtained in lattice calculations . in the context of this type of model the properties of the vacuum and meson sectors at @xmath0 have been studied in ref.@xcite .
this contribution is organized as follows . in sec .
2 we introduce the model lagrangian and its parameterizations . in sec .
3 we present and discuss our results for the behavior of some thermodynamical properties and the corresponding phase diagrams . finally , in sec .
4 our main conclusions are summarized .
we consider here a nonlocal su(2 ) chiral quark model which includes quark couplings to the color gauge fields .
the corresponding euclidean effective action is given by @xmath1 \psi(x ) \ ! - \ !
\frac{g_{s}}{2 } \big [ j_{a}(x)j_{a}(x)\ ! - \ !
j_{p}(x ) j_{p}(x ) \big ] \ ! + \ !
{ \cal u}\,(\phi[a(x)])\right\ } , \label{action}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath2 is the @xmath3 fermion doublet @xmath4 , and @xmath5 is the current quark mass matrix , in what follows we consider isospin symmetry , that is @xmath6 .
the fermion kinetic term includes a covariant derivative @xmath7 , where @xmath8 are color gauge fields .
the nonlocal currents @xmath9 are given by @xmath10 here , @xmath11 and @xmath12 .
the functions @xmath13 and @xmath14 in eq.([currents ] ) , are nonlocal covariant form factors characterizing the corresponding interactions .
the scalar - isoscalar component of the @xmath15 current will generate the momentum dependent quark mass in the quark propagator , while the `` momentum '' current , @xmath16 will be responsible for a momentum dependent wave function renormalization of this propagator . to proceed
it is convenient to perform a standard bosonization of the theory .
thus , we introduce the bosonic fields @xmath17 and @xmath18 , and integrate out the quark fields . in
what follows , we work within the mean - field approximation ( mfa ) , in which these bosonic fields are replaced by their vacuum expectation values @xmath19 and @xmath20 .
next , we extend the so obtained bosonized effective mfa action to finite temperature @xmath21 and chemical potential @xmath22 using the matsubara formalism .
concerning the gluon fields we will assume that they provide a constant background color field @xmath23 , where @xmath24 are the su(3 ) color gauge fields .
then the traced polyakov loop , which is taken as order parameter of confinement , is given by @xmath25 , where @xmath26 , @xmath27 .
we will work in the so - called polyakov gauge , in which the matrix @xmath28 is given a diagonal representation @xmath29 , which leaves only two independent variables , @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
owing to the charge conjugation properties of the qcd lagrangian @xcite , the mean field value of the polyakov loop field @xmath32 is expected to be a real quantity .
in addition , we assume as usual that @xmath30 and @xmath31 are real - valued fields @xcite , this implies that @xmath33 , then @xmath34/3 $ ] . within this framework the mean field thermodynamical potential @xmath35 results @xmath36 + \frac{\bar \sigma_1 ^ 2}{2\,g_s } + \frac{\kappa_p^2\ \bar \sigma_2 ^ 2}{2\,g_s } + { \cal{u}}(\bar \phi , t ) \ , \label{granp_reg}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , the shorthand notation @xmath37 has been used , and @xmath38 and @xmath39 are given by @xmath40 \qquad , \qquad z(p ) = \left [ 1 - \bar{\sigma}_{2 } \
f(p ) \right]^{-1 } \ , \label{mz}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath41 and @xmath42 are the fourier transform of @xmath13 and @xmath14 , respectively .
in addition , we have defined @xmath43 ^ 2 + { \vec{p}}\ \ ! ^2 \ , \ ] ] where the quantities @xmath44 are given by the relation @xmath45 .
namely , @xmath46 with @xmath47 for @xmath48 respectively . at this stage
we need to specify the explicit form of the polyakov loop effective potential . here , we used the fit to qcd lattice results proposed in ref .
@xcite .
@xmath35 turns out to be divergent and , thus , needs to be regularized . for this purpose
we use the same prescription as in ref .
namely @xmath49 where @xmath50 is obtained from the first term in eq.([granp_reg ] ) by setting @xmath51 and @xmath52 is the regularized expression for the quark thermodynamical potential in the absence of fermion interactions , @xmath53 \ , \label{freeomegareg}\ ] ] with @xmath54 .
finally , note that in eq.([omegareg ] ) we have included a constant @xmath55 which is fixed by the condition that @xmath56 vanishes at @xmath0 .
the mean field values @xmath57 and @xmath58 at a given temperature or chemical potential , are obtained from a set of three coupled `` gap '' equations .
this set of equations follows from the minimization of the regularized thermodynamical potential , that is @xmath59 once the mean field values are obtained , the @xmath60 behavior of other relevant quantities can be determined . in order to fully specify the model under consideration we have to fix the model parameters as well as the form factors @xmath61 and @xmath62 which characterize the non - local interactions .
following ref.@xcite , we consider two different type of functional dependencies for these form factors .
the first one corresponds to the often used exponential forms , @xmath63 \qquad , \qquad f(q)= \mbox{exp}[-q^{2}/\lambda_{1}^{2 } ] \ . \label{regulators}\ ] ] note that the range ( in momentum space ) of the nonlocality in each channel is determined by the parameters @xmath64 and @xmath65 , respectively .
fixing the @xmath0 values of @xmath66 and chiral quark condensate to reasonable values
@xmath67 mev and @xmath68 mev the rest of the parameters are determined so as to reproduce the empirical values @xmath69 mev and @xmath70 mev , and @xmath71 which is within the range of values suggested by recent lattice calculations@xcite . in what follows this choice of model parameters and form factors will be referred as parametrization s1 .
the second type of form factor functional forms we consider is given by @xmath72 where @xmath73^{-1 } \qquad ; \qquad f_{z}(q ) = \left [ 1 + \left ( q^{2}/\lambda_{1}^{2}\right ) \right]^{-5/2 } \ . \label{parametrization_set2}\ ] ] as shown in ref.@xcite , with a convenient choice of parameters one can very well reproduce the momentum dependence of mass and the renormalization function obtained in a landau gauge lattice calculation as well as the physical values of @xmath74 and @xmath75 . in what follows this parametrization
will be referred as s2 .
finally , in order to compare with previous studies where the wavefunction renormalization of the quark propagator has been ignored we consider a third parametrization ( s3 ) . in such case
we take @xmath39 = 1 ( setting @xmath42 = 0 ) and exponential parametrization for @xmath41 .
the values of the model parameters for each of the chosen parameterizations are summarized in table i. [ c]ccccc & & s1 & s2 & s3 + @xmath76 & mev & 5.70 & 2.37 & 5.78 + @xmath77 & & 32.030 & 20.818 & 20.650 + @xmath78 & mev & 814.42 & 850.00 & 752.20 + @xmath79 & gev & 4.180 & 6.034 &
@xmath80 + @xmath81 & mev & 1034.5 & 1400.0 & @xmath80 + [ tab1 ]
we start by analyzing the behavior of some mean field quantities as functions of @xmath21 and @xmath22 . since the results obtained for our three different parameterizations are qualitatively quite similar we only present explicitly those corresponding to the parametrization s1 . ,
@xmath82 and @xmath83 as functions of @xmath21 for low ( left ) , high ( right ) and cep ( central ) chemical potentials .
note that the scale to the left corresponds to that of @xmath84 while that to the right to @xmath82 and @xmath32 . since @xmath82 turns out to be negative we plot @xmath85 . ]
they are given in fig.1 where we plot @xmath86 , @xmath82 and @xmath32 as functions of @xmath21 for some values of the chemical potential .
1a shows that at @xmath87 there is a certain value of @xmath21 at which @xmath84 drops rapidly signalling the existence of a chiral symmetry restoration crossover transition , its position being determined by the peak of the chiral susceptibility . at basically the same temperature the polyakov loop @xmath32 increases which can be interpreted as the onset of the deconfinement transition .
as @xmath22 increases there is a certain value of @xmath88 above which the transition starts to be discontinuous . at this precise chemical potential
the transition is of second order .
this situation is illustrated in fig.1b .
the corresponding values @xmath89 define the position of the so - called `` critical end point '' . as displays in fig.1c , for @xmath90 the transition becomes discontinuous , i.e. of first order . finally , for chemical potentials above @xmath91 mev the system is in the chirally restored phase for all values of the temperature .
it is important to note that although @xmath82 appears to be rather constant in fig.1 , at higher values of @xmath21 it does go to zero as expected . concerning the deconfinement transition we see that as @xmath22 increases there appears a region where system remains in its confined phase ( signalled by @xmath32 smaller than @xmath92 ) even though chiral symmetry has been restored .
this corresponds to the recently proposed quarkyonic phase@xcite .
the phase diagrams corresponding to our three different parameterizations are given in fig.[phase diagrams ] . here
the dotted line corresponds to the line of crossover chiral transition while the full line to the line of first order chiral transition .
the dashed lines correspond to the deconfinement transition ( the lower and upper lines correspond to @xmath93 and @xmath94 , respectively ) . comparing those of s1 and s3 we see that the main effect of the wave function renormalization term is to shift the location of the cep towards lower values of @xmath21 and higher values @xmath22 .
concerning the lattice adjusted parametrization s2 we observe that it leads to even lower values of @xmath95 and higher values @xmath96 . and @xmath97 , respectively ) .
a non - local extension of the pnjl model momentum which leads to momentum dependent quark mass and wave function renormalization has been studied .
this model provides a simultaneous description for the deconfinement and chiral phase transition .
non - local interactions have been described by considering both a set of exponential form factors , and a set of form factors obtained from a fit to the mass and renormalization functions obtained in lattice calculations .
the resulting phase diagrams turn out to be qualitative similar , the position of the critical end point being the feature which depends more crucially on each particular parametrization .
we would like to thank the members of the organizing committee for their warm hospitality during the workshop .
this work has been supported in part by anpcyt ( argentina ) , under grant pict07 03 - 00818 .
s. roessner , c. ratti and w. weise , phys .
d * 75 * ( 2007 ) 034007 .
s. noguera , n. n. scoccola , phys .
d * 78 * ( 2008 ) 114002 .
a. dumitru , r. d. pisarski and d. zschiesche , phys .
d * 72 * ( 2005 ) 065008 .
d. gomez dumm and n. n. scoccola , phys .
c * 72 * ( 2005 ) 014909 .
m. b. parappilly et al , phys .
d * 73 * , 054504 ( 2006 ) .
|
understanding behavior interacting matter under extreme conditions temperature density issue interest significant progress on calculations lattice qcd not provide full understanding of qcd phase diagram hadron properties due to difficulties small current quark masses finite chemical potentials important to develop effective models consistency with lattice results extrapolated into regions not accessible by lattice models quark fields interact via local four point vertices polyakov loop introduced for confinement - deconfinement phase transition polyakov - models received attention consider non - local extension of pnjl models includes terms to quark wave function renormalization two parameterizations used exponential form based on fit to mass renormalization function in lattice calculations properties of vacuum meson sectors at @xmath0 studied in ref.@xcite contribution organized introduce model lagrangian parameterizations present discuss results for behavior thermodynamical properties phase diagrams main conclusions summarized consider nonlocal su(2 ) chiral quark model includes quark couplings to color gauge fieldseuclidean action by @xmath1 \psi(x ){g_{s}}{2 j_{a}(x_{p}(x )\phi[a(x)]){action{aligned @xmath2 is @xmath3 fermion doublet @xmath4 @xmath5 current quark mass matrix isospin symmetry @xmath6 fermion kinetic term includes covariant derivative @xmath7 @xmath8 are color gauge fields nonlocal currents @xmath9 by @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 functions @xmath13 @xmath14 nonlocal covariant form factors interactions scalar - isoscalar @xmath15 current momentum dependent quark mass in propagator momentum @xmath16 for momentum dependent wave function renormalization standard bosonization of theory introduce bosonic fields @xmath17 @xmath18 integrate quark fields within mean - field approximation bosonic fields replaced by vacuum expectation values @xmath19 and @xmath20 extend bosonized mfa action to finite temperature @xmath21 chemical potential @xmath22 using matsubara formalismgluon fields assume provide constant background color field @xmath23 @xmath24 are su(3 ) color gauge fields traced polyakov loop order parameter of confinement given by @xmath25 @xmath26 , @xmath27 work in polyakov gauge matrix @xmath28 diagonal representation @xmath29 leaves two independent variables @xmath30 and @xmath31 charge conjugation properties qcd lagrangian @xcite mean field value of polyakov loop field @xmath32 expected real quantity assume @xmath30 and @xmath31 real - valued fields @xcite implies @xmath33 @xmath34/3 $ mean field thermodynamical potential @xmath35 results @xmath36 +\sigma_1 shorthand notation @xmath37 used @xmath38 @xmath39 given by @xmath40 z(p ) = 1 -\sigma}_{2 @xmath41 and @xmath42 fourier transform of @xmath13 and @xmath14defined @xmath43 2 + quantities @xmath44 given by relation @xmath45 @xmath46 with @xmath47 for @xmath48 specify explicit form polyakov loop effective potential used fit to qcd lattice results in ref @xcite @xmath35 divergent needs regularized same prescription @xmath49 @xmath50 obtained from first term eq. setting @xmath51 and @xmath52 regularized expression for quark thermodynamical potential fermion interactions @xmath53 with @xmath54 eq.[omegareg included constant @xmath55 fixed by @xmath56 vanishes at @xmath0 mean field values @xmath57 @xmath58 at temperature chemical potential obtained from three coupled gap '' equations minimization of regularized thermodynamical potential @xmath59 mean field values obtained @xmath60 behavior of other relevant quantities determined specify model fix model parameters form factors @xmath61 and @xmath62 non - local interactions following ref.@xcite consider functional dependencies for form factorsfirst exponential forms @xmath63 \qquad f(q)= \mbox{exp}[-q^{2}/\lambda_{1}^{2 }{regulators range nonlocality channel determined by parameters @xmath64 @xmath65 fixing @xmath0 values @xmath66 chiral quark condensate to @xmath67 @xmath68 parameters reproduce empirical values @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 range recent lattice calculations referred as parametrization s1 second form factor functional forms @xmath72 @xmath73^{-1 } \qquad f_{z}(q ) = \left [ 1 + ( q^{2}/\lambda_{1}^{2}\right ) ]^{-5/2 }{parametrization_set2} choice parameters reproduce momentum dependence of mass renormalization function landau gauge lattice calculation physical values of @xmath74 @xmath75 parametrization referred as s2 compare studies wavefunction renormalization quark propagator ignored third parametrization s3 ) @xmath39 = 1 @xmath42 = 0 exponential parametrization for @xmath41values model parameters for summarized in table i. s1 s2 s3 + @xmath76 mev 5.70 2.37 5.78 + @xmath77 32.030 20.818 20.650 + @xmath78 mev 814.42 850.00 752.20 + @xmath79 gev 4.180 6.034 @xmath80 + @xmath81 mev 1034.5 & 1400.0 @xmath80 analyzing mean field quantities as functions of @xmath21 @xmath22 results for parameterizations similar present corresponding to s1 @xmath82 @xmath83 as functions of @xmath21 for low high cep chemical potentials scale left corresponds to @xmath84 right @xmath82 @xmath32 @xmath82 negative plot @xmath85 fig.1 @xmath86 @xmath82 @xmath32 as functions of @xmath21 for values chemical potential at @xmath87 value @xmath21 @xmath84 drops chiral symmetry restoration crossover transition polyakov loop @xmath32 increases onset deconfinement transition @xmath22 increases value of @xmath88 above transition discontinuous at chemical potential transition second order illustrated in fig.1bvalues @xmath89 define critical end point fig.1c for @xmath90 transition discontinuous first order chemical potentials above @xmath91 system in chirally restored phase for all values temperature @xmath82 constant in fig.1 at higher values @xmath21 zero @xmath22 increases region system remains in confined phase by @xmath32 smaller than @xmath92 chiral symmetry restored corresponds to proposed quarkyonic phase@xcite phase diagrams three parameterizations in fig. dotted line crossover chiral transition full line first order chiral transition dashed lines deconfinement transition lower upper lines to @xmath93 @xmath94 s1 s3 effect wave function renormalization location cep towards lower values @xmath21 higher values @xmath22 lattice adjusted parametrization s2 leads to lower values @xmath95 higher values @xmath96 @xmath97 non - local extension of pnjl model momentum leads to momentum dependent quark mass wave function renormalization studied model provides simultaneous description deconfinement chiral phase transition non - local interactions described by exponential form factors mass renormalization functions lattice calculationsphase diagrams similar critical end point depends parametrization organizing committee hospitality workshop work supported by anpcyt argentina grant pict07 03 - 00818 roessner ratti weise phys . d * 75 * 2007 ) 034007 noguera scoccola . d * 78 * 2008 ) 114002 dumitru pisarski zschiesche . d * 72 * 2005 ) 065008 gomez dumm scoccola phys. c * 72 * 2005 ) 014909 parappilly phys . d * 73 * 054504 2006 )
| 0.500955
| 3,218
| 1,723
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,718
|
arbitrary rotation of a qubit can be performed with a three - pulse sequence ; for example , zyz rotations
. however , this requires precise control of the relative phase and timing between the pulses , making it technically challenging in optical implementation in a short time scale .
here we show any zyz rotations can be implemented with a single laser - pulse , that is _ a chirped pulse with a temporal hole_. the hole of this shaped pulse induces a non - adiabatic interaction in the middle of the adiabatic evolution of the chirped pulse , converting the central part of an otherwise simple z - rotation to a y rotation , constructing zyz rotations .
the result of our experiment performed with shaped femtosecond laser pulses and cold rubidium atoms shows strong agreement with the theory .
|
qubit is the information stored in the quantum state of a two - level system , routinely used as the smallest unit of information processed in the quantum circuit model of quantum computation @xcite . in order to construct a universal computational gate set , single - qubit rotations , about at least two distinct rotational axes
are required as well as a two - qubit gate , e.g. , the cnot gate .
single - qubit rotation gates , such as hadamard and pauli x , y , and z gates have been implemented on numerous physical systems , including photons @xcite , ions @xcite , atoms @xcite , molecules @xcite , quantum dots @xcite , and superconducting qubits @xcite .
many single - qubit rotations in a sequence can also be performed with _ a single arbitrary rotation gate _ , which simplifies otherwise complex physical implementation of many distinct rotations in a unified fashion .
an arbitrary rotation ( of rotation angle @xmath0 and rotational axis @xmath1 ) can be constructed with a minimum of three rotations that correspond to the set of euler angle rotations : for example , the three rotations in the best - known zyz - decomposition are given by @xmath2 where @xmath3 represents a rotational transformation , and @xmath1 and @xmath0 are respectively given as a function of three rotation angles @xmath4 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 @xcite . in an optical implementation of two - level system dynamics , z - rotations use either a time - evolution or a far - detuned excitation @xcite , and x or y - rotations a resonant area - pulse interaction , both of which and their combinations require a precise control of the relative phase and timing among the constituent pulsed interactions .
in this paper , we show that an arbitrary rotation can be , alternatively , performed with a single laser - pulse , when the pulse is programmed to be _ a chirped pulse with a temporal hole_. as to be discussed in the rest of the paper , a single laser pulse with the given pulse shape implements zyz - decomposed rotations all at once , where the temporal hole in the middle of a chirped pulse induces a strong non - adiabatic evolution , which is a y - rotation , amid an otherwise monotonic adiabatic evolution , a z - rotation , due to the chirped pulse
. the predicted behavior of the zyz - decomposition is to be experimentally verified with cold atomic qubits and as - programmed femtosecond laser pulses .
we consider the dynamics of a two - level atom , driven by a chirped laser pulse with a temporal hole .
the electric field of the pulse , where both the main pulse and the hole are assumed to be of gaussian pulse shape , is given by @xmath7 where @xmath8 and @xmath9 are respectively the widths of the main pulse and the hole , @xmath10 ( @xmath11 ) is the depth of the hole , @xmath12 is the linear chirp parameter , and @xmath13 is the carrier phase .
the contribution of the carrier phase is a simple z - rotation , _
i.e. _ @xmath14 , so we will first consider the @xmath15 case .
when the state vectors are defined by @xmath16 and @xmath17 ( of respective energies @xmath18 and @xmath19 ) , the interaction hamiltonian in the adiabatic basis @xcite , after the rotating wave approximation , is given by @xmath20,\ ] ] where @xmath21 are the eigenvalues in the bare basis , for the rabi frequency @xmath22 and the instantaneous detuning @xmath23 , and @xmath24 is the adiabatic mixing angle defined by @xmath25 for @xmath26 .
however , with eq . , the phase of the state diverges at @xmath27 , so we use an additional transformation @xmath28 with @xmath29 $ ] to remove this rapidly oscillating phase .
the resulting hamiltonian is given in the interaction picture by @xmath30.\ ] ] figure 1 shows the behavior of the mixing angle @xmath24 , compared with the rabi frequency @xmath22 for various hole depth @xmath10 ( left panel ) , and the corresponding bloch vector evolution ( right panel ) .
the pulse without a hole in fig .
[ fig1](a ) shows a slow change in @xmath24 and relatively large @xmath22 , suggesting that the adiabatic condition , @xmath31 , is satisfied in all time .
so , a pulse without a hole induces an adiabatic evolution , _ i.e. _ a z - rotation in the adiabatic basis , as depicted in fig .
[ fig1](d ) . on the other hand , the pulses with a hole in figs .
[ fig1](b ) and [ fig1](c ) exhibit an abrupt change in @xmath24 near @xmath32 .
therefore , the overall dynamics may be decomposed to three sub - dynamics in different time zones : @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 , as clearly shown in figs .
[ fig1](e ) and [ fig1](f ) . in the central time zone ( @xmath34 )
, the hole makes @xmath22 small and a rapid change in @xmath24 occurs . since the hamiltonian is dominated by the non - adiabatic coupling in the off - diagonal components , it is approximately given by @xmath36,\ ] ] which corresponds to a y - rotation with a rotation angle @xmath37.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in both side regions ( @xmath33 and @xmath35 ) , z - rotations occur due to the adiabatic evolution of the chirped pulse .
the rotation angles are respectively given by @xmath38 dt \\
\phi_2 & = & \int_{\tau_h}^{\infty } \left [ |\delta(t)| - \sqrt{\delta^2(t)+\omega^2(t)}\right ] dt,\end{aligned}\ ] ] and when there is no detuning @xcite , @xmath4 equals @xmath5 due to the symmetry . as a result , the total time - evolution , including the z - rotation due to the carrier phase @xmath14 , is given by @xmath39 , \label{eq.rrr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which corresponds to zyz rotations .
when the qubit starts from an initial state defined by @xmath40 it can go , through the interaction with the as - programmed laser pulses , to an arbitrary position on the bloch sphere , as shown in fig .
[ fig2](a ) . .
the pulse carrier - envelope phase @xmath13 and the equivalent pulse - area @xmath41
@xcite were varied , while @xmath42 ps , @xmath43 rad / ps@xmath44 , @xmath45 , and @xmath46 were kept constant .
note that the shaded regions near the poles are physically unfeasible , requiring extreme conditions .
( b ) estimated z- and y - rotation angles , @xmath5 and @xmath6 , spanned by varrying @xmath41 and @xmath47 ( detuning ) @xcite , while @xmath48 ps , @xmath49 rad / ps@xmath44 , @xmath45 and @xmath50 were fixed.,scaledwidth=40.0% ] while this is only true for certain initial qubit states , as @xmath51 and @xmath6 in eq .
are not fully independent , the rotations can be made arbitrary : by using the detuning and pulse area in eq . , the full range range @xmath52 for @xmath53 and @xmath54 for @xmath6 are completely spanned as in fig .
[ fig2](b ) , ensuring the given zyz rotations to be arbitrary .
in order to verify the zyz rotations , of the chirped pulse with a temporal hole , we performed a proof - of - principle experiment with cold atomic qubits and as - programmed femtosecond laser pulses ( see fig . [ fig3 ] ) .
the detail of our laser experimental setup was described in our previous work @xcite .
briefly , we used amplified optical pulses from a ti : sapphire mode - locked laser .
initial pulses were produced at a repetition rate of 1 khz from the laser , wavelength - centered at the resonance wavelength 795 nm of the rubidium transition from 5s@xmath55 to 5p@xmath55 .
the spectral bandwidth was 2.5 thz in gaussian width , equivalent to a pulse duration of 212 fs ( fwhm ) for a transform - limited gaussian pulse .
the pulses were then shaped with an acousto - optic pulse programming device ( aopdf , dazzler from fastlite ) @xcite .
the two - level system was formed with the ground and excited states , @xmath56s@xmath55 and @xmath57p@xmath55 , of atomic rubidium ( @xmath58rb ) and the atoms were held in a magneto - optical trap @xcite .
the inhomogeneity of the laser - atom interaction @xcite , due to the spatial intensity profile of the laser , was minimized by reducing the size of the atom cloud 2.3 times smaller than the the laser beam size .
the size of the atom cloud was 250 @xmath59 m ( fwhm ) .
the control experiment was conducted in three steps : initialization , qubit rotation , and detection .
the atoms were first excited by a @xmath60-area pulse to initialize the atoms in the superposition state @xmath61 defined in eq . .
then , the chirped pulse with a temporal hole performed a rotation of the atomic state , @xmath62 .
lastly , atoms in the excited state were detected through ionization , using a frequency - doubled split - off of an un - shaped laser pulse and a micro - channel plate ( mcp ) detector .
the laser pulses for the initialization and qubit rotation were programmed , with a fixed relative phase , by the aopdf . in the frequency domain ,
the combined field is given by @xmath63 where @xmath64 is the @xmath60-area pulse , @xmath65 is the chirped pulse with a temporal hole , and @xmath13 is the carrier phase of the rotation pulse relative to the initialization pulse .
the total energy of these two pulses was up to 20 @xmath59j and the energy of each pulse was pre - calibrated through cross - correlation measurements .
the chirp parameter for the control pulse was fixed at @xmath66 rad / ps@xmath44 , which corresponses to frequency chirp of 60,000 fs@xmath44 in the spectral domain .
figure [ fig4 ] shows a comparison between experimental and theoretical results .
when atoms , in the initial superposition state @xmath61 in eq . , undergo the rotation , given in eq . , the excited - state probability is given by @xmath67 \label{eqevol2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the resulting behavior of @xmath68 is an oscillatory function , of which the amplitude and phase are determined by @xmath6 and @xmath69 . in fig .
[ fig4](a ) , the measured probability is plotted as a function of the equivalent ( peak ) pulse - area @xcite and the carrier phase @xmath13 .
the result strongly agrees with the calculation in fig .
[ fig4](b ) , performed with the corresponding time - domain schrdinger equation ( tdse ) .
each point in figs .
[ fig4](a ) and [ fig4](b ) corresponds to a distinct bloch vector evolution .
a few characteristic trajectories are shown in figs .
[ fig4](c , d,@xmath70,h ) ( see the figure caption for more detail ) . along the dashed lines in figs .
[ fig4](a ) and [ fig4](b ) , data points are extracted and compared in fig .
[ fig4](i ) , where the excited - state probabilities , @xmath71 , are plotted as a function of @xmath13 at fixed @xmath6 and @xmath4 .
the change of the peak oscillation point in fig .
[ fig4](i ) is related to the @xmath72-dependence of @xmath4 as in eq . ; @xmath4 is a monotonically decreasing function of @xmath72 , so the peaks in fig .
[ fig4](i ) shift to the upper right corner as @xmath72 increases .
also , the change in the oscillation amplitude is related to the @xmath72-dependence of @xmath6 .
as the electric - field amplitude @xmath72 increases , so does the rotation angle @xmath6 of the y - rotation ; however , it is up to a certain maximum @xmath72 , at above of which the dynamics involved with the hole gradually becomes adiabatic .
such behavior of @xmath6 is clearly demonstrated in fig .
[ fig4](i ) , where the oscillation amplitude given by @xmath73 in eq
. reaches maximal , along the line marked by , and decreases as @xmath72 increases .
therefore , the expected behavior @xmath4 and @xmath6 in eq .
is clearly observed in the experimental results .
in summary , we proposed and demonstrated the use of hybrid adiabatic and non - adiabatic interaction for single laser - pulse implementation of arbitrary qubit rotations . the chirped optical pulse with a temporal hole induced zyz - decomposed rotations of atomic qubits all at once , in which the temporal hole caused a non - adiabatic evolution amid an otherwise monotonic adiabatic evolution due to the chirped pulse .
the proof - of - principle experimental verification of the given laser - atom interaction was performed with programmed femtosecond laser pulses and cold atoms .
the result suggests that laser pulse - shape programming may be useful in quantum computation through concatenating gate operations in a quantum circuit .
f. h. l. koppens , c. buizert , k. j. tielrooij , i. t. vink , k. c. nowack , t. meunier , l. p. kouwenhoven , and l. m. k. vandersypen , `` driven coherent oscillations of a single electron spin in a quantum dot , '' nature * 442 * , 766 ( 2006 ) .
e. lucero , m. hofheinz , m. ansmann , r. c. bialczak , n. katz , m. neeley , a. d. oconnell , h. wang , a. n. cleland , and j. m. martinis , high - fidelity gates in a single josephson qubit , " phys . rev
100 * , 247001 ( 2008 ) .
|
qubit information in quantum state two - level system smallest unit information processed in quantum circuit model computation construct universal computational gate set single - qubit rotations two rotational axes required two - qubit gate cnot gate single - qubit rotation gates hadamard pauli x y z gates implemented on numerous physical systems including photons ions atoms molecules quantum dots superconducting qubits many single - qubit rotations can performed with single arbitrary rotation gate simplifies complex implementation rotations arbitrary rotation angle constructed with three rotations to euler angle rotations three rotations in zyz - decomposition given by @xmath2 @xmath3 rotational transformation @xmath1 @xmath0 function of three rotation angles optical two - level system dynamics z - rotations use time - evolution or far - detuned excitation x or y - rotations resonant area - pulse interaction require precise control of relative phase timing among pulsed interactions arbitrary rotation performed with single laser - pulse programmed chirped pulse with temporal holediscussed single laser pulse implements zyz - decomposed rotations temporal hole chirped pulse induces strong non - adiabatic evolution y - rotation amid monotonic adiabatic evolution z - rotation due to chirped pulse predicted behavior zyz - decomposition experimentally verified with cold atomic qubits programmed femtosecond laser pulses dynamics of two - level atom driven by chirped laser pulse with temporal hole electric field of pulse main pulse hole gaussian pulse shape given by @xmath7 widths of main pulse hole depth of hole linear chirp parameter @xmath13 carrier phase contribution carrier phase is simple z - rotation @xmath14 consider @xmath15 case state vectors defined by @xmath16 @xmath17 interaction hamiltonian in adiabatic basis rotating wave given by @xmath20 @xmath21 eigenvalues bare basis rabi frequency instantaneous detuning @xmath24 adiabatic mixing angle defined by @xmath25 @xmath26 eq .phase diverges at @xmath27 additional transformation @xmath28 with @xmath29 to remove rapidly oscillating phase resulting hamiltonian given interaction picture by @xmath30. figure 1 shows behavior mixing angle @xmath24 compared with rabi frequency @xmath22 hole depth @xmath10 bloch vector evolution pulse without hole shows slow change in @xmath24 large @xmath22 adiabatic condition @xmath31 satisfied pulse without hole induces adiabatic evolution z - rotation basis pulses with hole exhibit abrupt change in @xmath24 near @xmath32 overall dynamics decomposed to three sub - dynamics in time zones @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 in central time zone @xmath34 hole makes @xmath22 small rapid change in @xmath24 hamiltonian dominated by non - adiabatic coupling in off - diagonal components given by @xmath36 corresponds to y - rotation with rotation angle @xmath37. in both side regions z - rotations occur due to adiabatic evolution chirped pulserotation angles given by @xmath38_2_h\delta(t){\delta^2(t)+\omega^2(t){aligned no detuning @xcite @xmath4 equals @xmath5 due to symmetry total time - evolution including z - rotation due to carrier phase @xmath14 given by @xmath39 corresponds to zyz rotations qubit starts from initial state by @xmath40 can laser pulses to arbitrary position on bloch sphere in fig . pulse carrier - envelope phase @xmath13 and equivalent pulse - area @xmath41 @xcite varied @xmath42 ps @xmath43 kept constant shaded regions near poles unfeasible extreme conditions estimated z- and y - rotation angles @xmath5 @xmath6 by varrying @xmath41 and @xmath47 detuning @xcite @xmath48 ps @xmath49 rad @xmath50 fixed,scaledwidth=40.0% for initial qubit states rotations can be made arbitrary using detuning and pulse area infull range range @xmath52 spanned fig (b zyz rotations arbitrary verify zyz rotations chirped pulse temporal hole proof - - principle experiment with cold atomic qubits programmed femtosecond laser pulses fig laser setup described previous work @xcite used amplified optical pulses ti : sapphire mode - locked laser initial pulses repetition rate 1 khz wavelength - centered resonance wavelength 795 nm rubidium transition 5s to 5p spectral bandwidth 2.5 thz gaussian pulse duration 212 fs transform - limited gaussian pulse pulses shaped with acousto - optic pulse programming device @xcite two - level system formed ground excited states @xmath56s atomic rubidium atoms held in magneto - optical trap @xcite inhomogeneity laser - atom interaction minimized reducing size atom cloud 2.3 times smaller laser beam size size atom cloud 250 @xmath59 m ( fwhm ) control experiment three steps initialization qubit rotation detectionatoms excited by @xmath60-area pulse superposition state @xmath61 chirped pulse with temporal hole rotation atomic state @xmath62 atoms in excited state detected through ionization frequency - doubled split - off un - shaped laser pulse micro - channel plate detector laser pulses for initialization rotation programmed by aopdf frequency combined field by @xmath63 @xmath64-area pulse @xmath65 chirped pulse temporal hole @xmath13 carrier phase rotation pulse total energy pulses to 20 @xmath59j pre - calibrated through cross - correlation measurements chirp parameter for control pulse fixed at @xmath66 rad / ps@xmath44 frequency chirp of 60,000 fs@xmath44 comparison between experimental theoretical results atoms in initial superposition state @xmath61 rotation excited - state probability by @xmath67 resulting behavior of @xmath68 oscillatory function amplitude phase determined by @xmath6 @xmath69 measured probability function of equivalent pulse - area @xcite carrier phase @xmath13result agrees with calculation fig fig4](b ) time - domain schrdinger equation each point in(a(b ) corresponds to bloch vector evolution characteristic trajectories shown in figs fig4](c d,h ) dashed lines in(a(b ) data points extracted compared in fig](i ) excited - state probabilities @xmath71 plotted function of @xmath13 at @xmath6 @xmath4 change of peak oscillation point in(i ) related to @xmath72-dependence of @xmath4 monotonically decreasing function of @xmath72 peaks shift to upper right corner as @xmath72 increases change in oscillation amplitude related to @xmath72-dependence of @xmath6 electric - field amplitude @xmath72 increases rotation angle y - rotation up to maximum @xmath72 becomes adiabatic behavior @xmath6 demonstrated in fig fig4](i ) oscillation amplitude @xmath73 reaches maximal decreases as @xmath72 increases expected behavior @xmath4 and @xmath6 in observed in experimental resultsproposed demonstrated hybrid adiabatic non - adiabatic interaction single laser - pulse arbitrary qubit rotations chirped optical pulse temporal hole induced - decomposed rotations atomic qubits temporal hole caused non - adiabatic evolution monotonic adiabatic evolution verification laser - atom interaction with programmed femtosecond laser pulses cold atoms result suggests laser pulse - shape programming useful quantum computation gate operations koppens buizert tielrooij vink nowack meunier kouwenhoven vandersypen coherent oscillations single electron spin quantum dot nature * 442 766 ( 2006 ) lucero hofheinz ansmann bialczak katz neeley oconnell wang cleland martinis high - fidelity gates single josephson qubit . rev 100 247001 ( 2008 )
| 0.505881
| 3,284
| 1,624
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,731
|
the equivalence of mass and energy is indelibly linked with relativity , both by scientists and in the popular mind . here
i prove that @xmath0 by demanding momentum conservation of an object that emits two equal electromagnetic wave packets in opposite directions in its own frame .
in contrast to einstein s derivation of this equation , which applies energy conservation to a similar thought experiment , the new derivation employs no effects that are greater than first order in @xmath1 and therefore does not rely on results from special relativity .
in addition to momentum conservation , it uses only aberration of starlight and the electromagnetic - wave momentum - energy relation @xmath2 , both of which were established by 1884 . in particular , no assumption is made about the constancy of the speed of light , and the derivation proceeds equally well if one assumes that light is governed by a galilean transformation . in view of this
, it is somewhat puzzling that the equivalence of mass and energy was not derived well before the advent of special relativity .
the new derivation is simpler and more transparent than einstein s and is therefore pedagogically useful .
|
@xcite derived the equivalence of mass and energy ( @xmath0 ) by considering an object of mass @xmath3 that simultaneously emits two electromagnetic packets , each with energy @xmath4 in opposite ( @xmath5 and @xmath6 ) directions . by momentum conservation in the rest frame of the object
, it does not change its velocity after emission .
seen from a frame moving at velocity @xmath7 ( i.e. , along the axis defined by the emissions ) , the two packets are each doppler shifted ( in opposite directions ) , so that the total energy of these packets is higher in the moving frame than the rest frame by @xmath8 , where @xmath9 .
@xcite argued that by energy conservation , the object must lose energy in the moving frame by an amount that is greater than what it loses in the rest frame by exactly this difference .
@xcite had already shown in his earlier paper introducing special relativity , that the kinetic energy of a mass @xmath3 moving at velocity @xmath10 is @xmath11 .
appealing to this result , @xcite concluded that the mass of the emitting object must decline from @xmath3 to @xmath12 , where @xmath13 . here
i show that the same result can be derived from conservation of momentum , without invoking any results from special relativity .
that is , the derivation uses only effects that are first order in @xmath1 , and does not employ the second - order effects that characterize special relativity .
consider as above an object emitting the two electromagnetic packets that , viewed in its rest frame are equal and opposite . by momentum conservation ,
the dual ejection leaves the object at rest in this frame .
see figure [ fig : frames ] . now consider the same event from a frame that is moving _ perpendicular _ ( with velocity @xmath15 ) relative to the emission directions . by symmetry ,
the wave packets are still equal , but they are no longer opposite : because of the aberration of starlight ( first discovered by james bradley in 1729 ) , the packets will both appear to be moving slightly upward , at an angle @xmath16 .
denote the emitted energies of the packets _ in the moving frame _ by @xmath4 , and denote the mass of object in this frame before and after emission by @xmath3 and @xmath17 . by a variety of arguments elaborated below , the magnitude of the momenta of the two packets in this frame
are @xmath18 hence , because of aberration of starlight , the vertical components of these momenta will be ( to first order in @xmath1 ) @xmath19 equating the total @xmath20-momentum in the moving frame before and after emission yields , @xmath21 which can be solved to obtain , @xmath22 note that in carrying out this derivation , i explicitly ignored terms higher than first order in @xmath23 , in particular when i adopted @xmath24 . hence , the result strictly applies only in the limit @xmath25 , i.e. , in the rest frame .
this can be expressed as an equivalence between energy and rest - mass , @xmath26 i address the question of how this result can be generalized to moving bodies in
[ sec : moving ] . in the derivation ,
i used the relation between the energy @xmath27 and momentum @xmath28 for ( monodirectional ) electromagnetic fields , @xmath29 of course , this can be derived from special relativity , but the orientation here is to derive equation ( [ eqn : emc2 ] ) with no recourse to relativity , nor to concepts of a similar vintage , such as photons .
@xcite recapitulates @xcite s manipulations of maxwell s equations to derive the electromagnetic energy flux density @xmath30 , where @xmath31 and @xmath32 are the electric and magnetic fields .
he then develops a similar manipulation of maxwell s equations ( together with the lorentz force law ) to derive the momentum density @xmath33 , where @xmath34 is the magnetic induction .
combining these two equations for monodirectional electromagnetic waves in free space yields equation ( [ eqn : pegamma ] ) .
this shows that this relation rests directly on the maxwell / lorentz equations , although whether anyone actually derived the expression for @xmath35 prior to the simplification of vector notation is not clear .
however , @xcite already uses @xmath36 for isotropic electromagnetic radiation in his thermodynamic derivation of stefan s law . here
@xmath37 is the pressure and @xmath38 is the energy density .
this expression already implies @xmath39 for monodirectional electromagnetic waves .
as emphasized in [ sec : derivation ] , by carrying out the derivation only to first order in @xmath23 , i ultimately restricted its validity to bodies at rest .
put differently , if the true relation between mass and energy had the form , @xmath40 , the derivation would have proceeded exactly the same way .
there are two paths to generalizing the result to moving bodies .
the first is to adopt the results of special relativity .
this is the approach of @xcite , who derived @xmath0 using momentum conservation when light is emitted in an arbitrary direction . in special relativity ,
equation ( [ eqn : pgammamov ] ) is exact , so the derived relation between mass and energy is exact to all orders in @xmath23 .
this approach is pedagogically useful : like einstein s derivation , it makes use of special relativity , but it is simpler and more direct .
however , as a historical and logical exercise , one may also ask how equation ( [ eqn : em0c2 ] ) could have been generalized if it had been discovered prior to special relativity .
such a generalization follows from a simple thought experiment .
imagine a box filled with warm gas , whose thermal energy ultimately resides in the kinetic energy of the atoms . at the time , this picture was controversial but at least some physicists ( e.g. , boltzmann ) held to it .
light is emitted from two holes in the box , similarly to the situation in
[ sec : derivation ] .
the energy of the light packets is drawn from the kinetic energy of the atoms in the box , some of which now move more slowly . by equation ( [ eqn : emc2 ] ) ,
the box has lost not only energy , but also mass . however , since the box contains no inter - atom potential energy , the mass ( i.e. , inertia ) of the box must be the sum of the mass ( inertia ) of the atoms in it .
as the number of these has not changed , the mass of some of the atoms must have been reduced by exactly the amount of reduced mass of the box , which is exactly the same as the kinetic energy lost from these atoms divided by @xmath41 .
that is , kinetic energy also contributes to inertia .
up to this point , i have derived @xmath0 without ever making use of @xcite s postulate that @xmath42 is the same in all frames of reference , nor of any of the results that he derived from this postulate .
i now show that special relativity , including the universality of @xmath42 , can be derived from this equation .
first , @xcite shows that @xmath0 leads to the growth of inertia with velocity , @xmath43 . to permit clarification of a subtle point
, i repeat that derivation here , beginning with the newtonian equation relating force to the increase of kinetic energy , @xmath44 . using the definitions , @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 , this
can be written @xmath48 , or @xmath49 substituting in the just derived @xmath0 yields @xmath50 at this point , there may be some question as to whether the one may pull `` @xmath42 '' out of the derivative , since it has not yet been shown to be `` constant '' .
but @xmath42 is a _ constant _ in any one frame : the point that has not yet been addressed is whether it is _ invariant _ under frame changes . in the present case ,
the observer is not changing frames : it is the mass that is accelerating .
the quantities @xmath51 , @xmath3 , @xmath10 , and @xmath42 are all as measured in the observer frame , which is inertial .
we then obtain , @xmath52 whose solution is @xmath53 where @xmath54 is an integration constant , which we identify with the rest mass . from this point , it is straightforward to derive the other relations of special relativity by well - known arguments .
for example , as a fast train passes by , a passenger and a bystander each throw tennis balls transverse to the motion of the train ( with equal strength ) in such a way that they hit and each bounces back directly to its respective thrower .
the balls must each return at the speed they were launched or the train passenger could detect her own motion . thus , they must have equal and opposite momenta .
the bystander reckons that the passenger s ball is more massive and therefore concludes it s transverse velocity is smaller , which can only be true if time passes more closely . by similar traditional arguments
, one can go on to derive length contraction , etc . in this way
, one can prove that the speed of light is the same in all frames of reference rather than assuming it .
while the result obtained here is obviously not new , there are three reasons for establishing this result using a new derivation .
first , the expression @xmath0 is zeroth order in @xmath1 , in sharp contrast to the majority of results from special relativity , which are second order .
it seems more elegant , therefore , to derive this expression using first - order arguments , rather than relying on second - order expressions .
second , because the derivation is more elegant , it has pedagogical value , i.e. , it is easier to transmit to students .
third , because the derivation is independent of special relativity , it raises the question of why @xmath0 was not derived earlier than 1905 .
in particular , the elements needed to derive it ( momentum conservation , aberration of starlight , and the proportionality between electromagnetic energy and momentum ) were all in place by 1884 . indeed , once one realizes that electromagnetic waves have momentum ( even if one does not yet know the exact expression for this quantity ) , it follows immediately from momentum conservation and aberration of starlight that a light - emitting object must lose mass . as reviewed by @xcite , during the 25 years before special relativity
there were many efforts to express the mass of particles in terms of their energy divided by @xmath41 .
but these differed from the arguments given here ( and that i have argued could have been given at least as early as 1884 ) by two important features .
first , they generally centered around evaluations of the ultimately rather nebulous electromagnetic self - energy of charged particles rather than the kinetic properties of all matter ( charged or neutral ) .
second , these evaluations did not recognize ( at least explicitly ) that when an object emitted energy , it also lost mass . indeed , the very complexity of the arguments developed in this era compared to the absolute simplicity of the derivation in [ sec : derivation ] makes it even more puzzling why no one hit on the latter .
|
@xcite derived equivalence of mass energy @xmath0 object mass @xmath3 emits two electromagnetic packets each energy @xmath4 opposite directions momentum conservation rest frame object change velocity after emission from frame moving at velocity @xmath7 two packets doppler shifted opposite directions total energy higher in moving frame than rest frame @xmath8 @xcite argued energy conservation object must lose energy in moving frame greater than rest frame @xcite shown kinetic energy of mass @xmath3 moving at velocity @xmath10 is @xmath11 @xcite concluded mass emitting object must decline from @xmath3 to @xmath12 same result derived from conservation of momentum without invoking results special relativity derivation uses effects first order in @xmath1 second - order effects special relativity consider object emitting two electromagnetic packets rest equal opposite momentum conservation dual ejection leaves object at rest frame see figure consider same event from frame moving perpendicular velocity @xmath15 ) relative to emission directionswave packets equal no longer opposite aberration starlight discovered by james bradley 1729 packets moving slightly upward angle @xmath16 denote emitted energies packets by @xmath4 mass object before after emission by @xmath3 and @xmath17 magnitude momenta of two packets are @xmath18 aberration starlight vertical components momenta @xmath19 equating total @xmath20-momentum before after emission @xmath21 solved obtain @xmath22 derivation ignored terms higher than first order in @xmath23 adopted @xmath24 result applies only in limit @xmath25 rest frame expressed as equivalence between energy and rest - mass @xmath26 result to moving bodies derivation used relation between energy @xmath27 and momentum @xmath28 for monodirectional electromagnetic fields @xmath29 derived from special relativity orientation derive equation ( [ eqn : emc2 ] ) no recourse to relativity concepts @xcite recapitulates manipulations maxwell s equations derive electromagnetic energy flux density @xmath30 @xmath31 and @xmath32 are electric and magnetic fieldsdevelops maxwell s equations lorentz force law derive momentum density @xmath33 @xmath34 magnetic induction combining equations monodirectional electromagnetic waves yields equation [ eqn : pegamma ] ) relation rests on maxwell / lorentz equations derived expression @xmath35 simplification vector notation @xcite uses @xmath36 for isotropic electromagnetic radiation thermodynamic derivation stefan s law @xmath37 pressure @xmath38 energy density implies @xmath39 for monodirectional electromagnetic waves derivation first order @xmath23 restricted validity to bodies at rest relation mass energy form @xmath40 derivation proceeded two paths generalizing result moving bodies adopt results special relativity approach @xcite derived @xmath0 momentum conservation light emitted arbitrary direction special relativity equation ( [ eqn : pgammamov ] ) exact relation between mass energy all orders in @xmath23 approach pedagogically useful einstein s derivation simpler more direct equation ( [ eqn : em0c2 ] generalized discovered prior special relativity generalization follows from thought experimentimagine box filled with warm gas thermal energy resides in kinetic energy atoms picture controversial some physicists boltzmann held to it light emitted from two holes in box similarly to derivation energy light packets drawn from kinetic energy atoms some move slowly box lost energy mass box contains no inter - atom potential energy mass inertia ) box must be sum of atoms number not changed mass atoms must reduced by reduced mass box same as kinetic energy lost from atoms divided by @xmath41 kinetic energy contributes to inertia derived @xmath0 without @xcite s postulate that @xmath42 same in all frames of reference results now show special relativity including universality of @xmath42 can be derived from equation @xcite shows @xmath0 leads to growth of inertia with velocity , @xmath43 repeat derivation beginning with newtonian equation relating force to increase of kinetic energy , @xmath44 .definitions @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 written @xmath48 or @xmath49 substituting @xmath0 yields @xmath50 question pull @xmath42 '' out of derivative not yet shown constant '' @xmath42 is _ constant _ in one frame not addressed _ invariant _ under frame changes observer not changing frames mass accelerating quantities @xmath51 @xmath3 @xmath10 @xmath42 measured in observer frame inertial obtain @xmath52 solution is @xmath53 @xmath54 integration constant identify with rest mass straightforward to derive other relations of special relativity by arguments fast train passes passenger bystander throw tennis balls transverse to motion train equal strength hit each bounces back to thrower balls must return at speed launched or train passenger detect motion have equal opposite momenta bystander reckons passenger s ball more massive concludes s transverse velocity smaller true if time passes closely similar traditional arguments derive length contraction prove speed of light same in all frames of reference result not new three reasons for establishing result using new derivationexpression @xmath0 is zeroth order in @xmath1 contrast to results from special relativity second order more elegant to derive expression using first - order arguments second - order expressions derivation elegant has pedagogical value easier to transmit to students derivation independent of special relativity raises question of why @xmath0 not derived earlier 1905 elements needed to ( momentum conservation aberration of starlight proportionality between electromagnetic energy and momentum in place by 1884 electromagnetic waves have momentum light - emitting object must lose mass reviewed 25 years before special relativity efforts to express mass of particles in energy divided by @xmath41 differed from arguments given here 1884 by two centered around evaluations nebulous electromagnetic self - energy of charged particles rather kinetic properties of all matter evaluations not recognize when object emitted energy lost mass complexity of arguments in this era compared to simplicity of derivation makes puzzling why no one hit on latter
| 0.365719
| 2,432
| 1,238
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,759
|
exclusive production of neutrinos via photon - photon fusion provides an excellent opportunity to probe electromagnetic properties of the neutrinos at the lhc .
we explore the potential of processes @xmath0 and @xmath1 to probe neutrino - photon and neutrino - two photon couplings .
we show that these reactions provide more than seven orders of magnitude improvement in neutrino - two photon couplings compared to lep limits .
|
neutrinos do not interact with photons in the standard model ( sm ) .
however , minimal extension of the sm with massive neutrinos yields neutrino - photon and neutrino - two photon interactions through radiative corrections @xcite . despite the fact that minimal extension of the sm induces very small couplings , there are several models beyond the sm predicting relatively large neutrino - photon and neutrino - two photon couplings .
electromagnetic properties of the neutrinos have important implications on particle physics , astrophysics and cosmology . therefore probing electromagnetic structure of the neutrinos at colliders
is important for understanding the physics beyond the sm and contributes to the studies in astrophysics and cosmology .
the large hadron collider ( lhc ) generates high energetic proton - proton collisions with a high luminosity .
it is commonly believed that it will help to answer many fundamental questions in particle physics . recently
a new phenomenon called exclusive production was observed in the measurements of cdf collaboration @xcite and its physics potential has being studied at the lhc @xcite .
complementary to proton - proton interactions , studies of exclusive production might be possible and opens new field of studying very high energy photon - photon and photon - proton interactions .
therefore it is interesting to investigate the potential of lhc as a photon collider to probe the electromagnetic properties of the neutrinos . atlas and cms collaborations have a program of forward physics with extra detectors located at distances of 220 m and 420 m from the interaction point @xcite .
range of these 220 m and 420 m detectors overlap and they can detect protons in a continuous range of @xmath2 where @xmath2 is the proton momentum fraction loss defined by the formula , @xmath3 . here
@xmath4 is the momentum of incoming proton and @xmath5 is the momentum of intact scattered proton .
atlas forward physics ( afp ) collaboration proposed an acceptance of @xmath6 .
there are also other scenarios with different acceptances of the forward detectors .
cms - totem forward detector scenario spans @xmath7 @xcite .
one of the well - known application of the forward detectors is the high energy photon - photon fusion .
this reaction is produced by two quasireal photons emitted from protons . since the emitted quasireal photons have a low virtuality they do not spoil the proton structure .
therefore scattered protons are intact and forward detector equipment allows us to detect intact scattered protons after the collision .
the photon - photon fusion can be described by equivalent photon approximation ( epa ) @xcite . in the framework of epa , emitted
photons have a low virtuality and scattered with small angles from the beam pipe .
therefore they are almost real and the cross section for the complete process @xmath8 can be obtained by integrating the cross section for the subprocess @xmath9 over the effective photon luminosity @xmath10 @xmath11 where w is the invariant mass of the two photon system and the effective photon luminosity is given by the formula @xmath12 with @xmath13 here @xmath14 is the energy of one of the emitted photons from the proton , @xmath15 and @xmath16 are the functions of the equivalent photon spectra .
equivalent photon spectrum of virtuality @xmath17 and energy @xmath18 is given by @xmath19\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath20 here e is the energy of the incoming proton beam and @xmath21 is the mass of the proton .
the magnetic moment of the proton is taken to be @xmath22 . @xmath23 and @xmath24 are functions of the electric and magnetic form factors . in the above epa formula ,
electromagnetic form factors of the proton have been taken into consideration . in this work
we investigate the potential of exclusive @xmath0 and @xmath1 reactions at the lhc to probe @xmath25 and @xmath26 couplings .
we obtain model independent bounds on these couplings considering dirac neutrinos . during numerical analysis
we assume that center of mass energy of the proton - proton system is @xmath27 tev .
non - standard @xmath25 interaction can be described by the following dimension 6 effective lagrangian @xcite @xmath28 where @xmath29 is the magnetic moment of @xmath30 and @xmath31 @xmath32 is the transition magnetic moment . in the above effective lagrangian new physics energy scale @xmath33
is absorbed in the definition of @xmath29 .
the most general dimension 7 effective lagrangian describing @xmath26 coupling is given by @xcite @xmath34 where @xmath35 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 and @xmath38 are dimensionless coupling constants .
current experimental bounds on neutrino magnetic moment are stringent .
the most sensitive bounds from neutrino - electron scattering experiments with reactor neutrinos are at the order of @xmath39 @xcite .
bounds derived from solar neutrinos are at the same order of magnitude @xcite .
bounds on magnetic moment can also be derived from energy loss of astrophysical objects .
these give about an order of magnitude more restrictive bounds than reactor and solar neutrino probes @xcite .
neutrino - two photon coupling has been less studied in the literature .
current experimental bounds on this coupling are derived from rare decay @xmath40 @xcite and the analysis of @xmath41 conversion @xcite .
lep data on @xmath40 decay sets an upper bound of @xcite @xmath42 ^ 6 \sum_{i , j , k}\left(|\alpha^{ij}_{rk}|^2+|\alpha^{ij}_{lk}|^2\right)\leq2.85\times10^{-9}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the analysis of the primakoff effect on @xmath41 conversion in the external coulomb field of the nucleus @xmath43 yields about two orders of magnitude more restrictive bound than @xmath44 decay @xcite . in the presence of the effective interactions ( [ nunuphoton ] ) and ( [ nunuphotonphoton ] ) , @xmath45 scattering is described by three tree - level diagrams .
the polarization summed amplitude square is given by the following simple formula @xmath46 where s , t and u are the mandelstam variables and we omit the mass of neutrinos . in the above amplitude we also neglect interference terms between interactions ( [ nunuphoton ] ) and ( [ nunuphotonphoton ] ) .
neutrinos are not detected directly in the central detectors . instead
, their presence is inferred from missing energy signal .
therefore statistical analysis has to be performed with some care .
any sm process with final states which are not detected by the central detectors can not be discerned from @xmath47 .
atlas and cms have central detectors with a pseudorapidity coverage @xmath48 .
the sm processes with final state particles scattered with very large angles from the beam pipe may exceed the angular range of the central detectors .
hence any sm process with final states in the interval @xmath49 should be accepted as a background for @xmath45 .
there are also other sources of backgrounds .
the one which may affect our results is the instrumental background due to calorimeter noise .
the calorimeter noise can be effectively suppressed by imposing a cut on the transverse energy of the jets . according to ref.@xcite
the calorimeter noise is negligible for jets with a transverse energy greater than 40 gev ( @xmath50 gev ) .
of course the calorimeter noise is not the only factor which affects the jet efficiency .
based on @xcite we take into account a global efficiency of 0.6 .
this is actually a prudent value for the global efficiency .
we have considered the following background processes : @xmath51 our backgrounds can be arranged into three classes : ( 1)- @xmath52 , @xmath53 and @xmath54 with @xmath49 for all final charged particles .
( 2)-@xmath53 and @xmath55 with @xmath49 for final charged leptons and @xmath48 , @xmath56 gev for final quarks , i.e. , final quarks with @xmath56 gev are assumed to be missing even for @xmath48 .
( 3)-we assume that 40% of the number of events from reactions @xmath53 and @xmath57 with @xmath49 for final charged leptons and @xmath48 , @xmath50 gev for final quarks is missing .
among all the background processes the biggest contribution comes from electron - positron production with @xmath49 .
the reason originates from the fact that the cross section is highly peaked in the forward and backward directions due to small mass of the electron and @xmath58 pole structure .
the sum of all background cross sections is @xmath59 pb for @xmath7 and @xmath60 pb for @xmath6 .
we have estimated 95% confidence level ( c.l . )
bounds using one - parameter @xmath61 test without a systematic error .
sm prediction about missing number of events is @xmath62 . here
@xmath63 is the integrated luminosity , 0.9 is the qed two - photon survival probability and @xmath64 is the sum of all background cross sections . in order to test sm prediction we use the following @xmath61 function : @xmath65 where @xmath66 is the cross section for the process @xmath67 and @xmath68 is the statistical error . in tables
[ tab1 ] and [ tab2 ] , we show 95% c.l .
upper bounds of the couplings @xmath69 and @xmath70 . as we have mentioned , diagonal elements @xmath29 are strictly constrained by the experiments .
if we assume that @xmath31 is diagonal then our limits are many orders of magnitude worse than the current experimental limits . on the other hand we see from the tables that our bounds on @xmath71 are approximately at the order of @xmath72 .
it is 7 orders of magnitude more restrictive than the lep bound .
as we have mentioned , during statistical analysis we consider the background processes given in ( [ background ] ) .
the main contribution is provided by the processes @xmath73 with @xmath49 .
of course there are other backgrounds that we have not taken into account . but
these others are expected to give relatively small contributions .
furthermore , even a large background does not spoil our limits significantly .
for instance , if we assume that background cross section is 4 times larger than the sum of all backgrounds that we have considered , our limits are spoiled only a factor of 2 .
they are still at the order of @xmath72 . the subprocess @xmath74 is described by 8 tree - level diagrams containing effective @xmath25 and @xmath26 couplings ( fig.[fig1 ] ) .
the analytical expression for the amplitude square is quite lengthy so we do not present it here . but
it depends on the couplings of the form ; @xmath75 , @xmath76 and @xmath77 where we assume that @xmath78 ; @xmath79 .
@xmath80 is absent in the sm at the tree - level .
sm contribution is originated from loop diagrams involving 5 vertices .
since the sm contribution is very suppressed it is appropriate to set bounds on the couplings using a poisson distribution .
the expected number of events has been calculated considering the leptonic decay channel of the z boson as the signal @xmath81 , where @xmath82 or @xmath83 .
we also place a cut of @xmath48 for final state @xmath84 and @xmath83 .
upper bounds of the couplings @xmath85 , @xmath86 and @xmath69 are presented in tables [ tab3 ] and [ tab4 ] .
we observe from the tables that the subprocess @xmath74 provides approximately an order of magnitude more restrictive bounds on @xmath87 coupling with respect to @xmath88 . on the other hand
both processes have almost same potential to probe the coupling @xmath89 .
forward detector equipments allow us to study lhc as a high energy photon collider . by use of forward detectors
we can detect intact scattered protons after the collision .
therefore deep inelastic scattering which spoils the proton structure , can be easily discerned from the exclusive photo - production processes .
this provides us an opportunity to probe electromagnetic properties of the neutrinos in a very clean environment .
we show that exclusive @xmath90 and @xmath91 reactions at the lhc probe neutrino - two photon couplings with a far better sensitivity than the current limits .
former reaction improves the sensitivity limits by up to a factor of @xmath92 and latter improves a factor of @xmath93 with respect to lep limits .
v. castellani and s. deglinnocenti , astrophys . j. * 402 * , 574 ( 1993 ) .
m. catelan , j. a. d. pacheco and j. e. horvath , astrophys .
j. * 461 * , 231 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9509062 ] .
a. ayala , j. c. dolivo and m. torres , phys .
d * 59 * , 111901 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9804230 ] .
r. barbieri and r. n. mohapatra , phys .
lett . * 61 * , 27 ( 1988 ) .
j. m. lattimer and j. cooperstein , phys .
lett . * 61 * , 23 ( 1988 ) .
a. heger , a. friedland , m. giannotti and v. cirigliano , astrophys .
j. * 696 * , 608 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0809.4703 [ astro - ph ] ] .
cms collaboration , _ cms physics technical design report volume i _ , editor : d. acosta , cern / lhcc 2006 - 001 .
upper bounds of the couplings @xmath89 and @xmath71 for the process @xmath94 .
we consider various values of the integrated lhc luminosities .
forward detector acceptance is @xmath7 .
@xmath33 is taken to be 1 gev and limits of @xmath89 is given in units of bohr magneton .
[ tab1 ] [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
|
neutrinos interact with photons in standard model minimal extension sm with massive neutrinos yields - two photon interactions through radiative corrections @xcite minimal extension induces small couplings models beyond sm large neutrino - photon two photon couplings electromagnetic properties neutrinos particle physics astrophysics cosmology probing electromagnetic structure at colliders important for understanding physics large hadron collider lhc generates high energetic proton - proton collisions high luminosity fundamental questions in particle physics exclusive production observed in measurements cdf collaboration @xcite physics potential studied at lhc @xcite studies of exclusive production field studying high energy photon - photon photon - proton interactions to investigate potential lhc as photon collider to probe electromagnetic properties neutrinos atlas cms collaborations have program forward physics with extra detectors at 220 m 420 m from interaction point @xcite detectors overlap detect protons in continuous range of @xmath2 proton momentum fraction loss incoming scattered proton atlas forward collaboration proposed acceptance of @xmath6other scenarios acceptances forward detectors cms - totem forward detector scenario spans @xmath7 @xcite application high energy photon - photon fusion reaction produced two quasireal photons from protons low virtuality spoil proton structure scattered protons intact detector equipment after collision photon - photon fusion described by equivalent photon approximation ( epa ) @xcite emitted photons low virtuality scattered small angles from beam pipe almost real cross section complete process @xmath8 obtained integrating cross section subprocess @xmath9 over effective photon luminosity @xmath10 @xmath11 w invariant mass photon system effective photon luminosity formula @xmath12 @xmath14 energy proton functions equivalent photon spectra equivalent photon spectrum virtuality energy given by @xmath19 e energy incoming proton beam mass proton magnetic moment proton @xmath22 @xmath23 functions of electric magnetic form factors electromagnetic form factors proton investigate potential exclusive @xmath0 @xmath1 reactions at lhc @xmath25 @xmath26 couplings obtain model independent bounds couplings considering dirac neutrinosanalysis center mass energy proton - system @xmath27 tev non - standard @xmath25 interaction dimension 6 lagrangian @xcite @xmath28 @xmath29 magnetic moment @xmath30 transition magnetic moment @xmath33 definition @xmath29 general dimension 7 lagrangian @xmath26 coupling @xcite @xmath34 @xmath35 dimensionless coupling constants experimental bounds neutrino magnetic moment stringent sensitive bounds from neutrino - electron scattering experiments reactor neutrinos @xmath39 @xcite bounds solar neutrinos same bounds magnetic moment from energy loss astrophysical objects restrictive bounds reactor solar neutrino probes neutrino - two photon coupling less studied experimental bounds from rare decay @xmath40 @xcite analysis @xmath41 conversiondata @xmath40 decay sets upper bound @xcite @xmath42\left\alpha^{ij}_{rk}^2_{lk}\right\leq2.85\times10^{-9}{aligned analysis primakoff effect on @xmath41 conversion external coulomb field @xmath43 yields two orders restrictive bound than @xmath44 decay @xcite interactions nunuphoton nunuphotonphoton @xmath45 scattering described three tree - level diagrams polarization summed amplitude square given formula @xmath46 s t u mandelstam variables omit mass neutrinos interference terms between interactions nunuphoton neutrinos not detected central detectors presence inferred from missing energy signal statistical analysis care sm process final states not detected central detectors discerned from @xmath47 atlas cms have central detectors pseudorapidity coverage @xmath48 sm processes final state particles scattered large angles exceed angular range central detectors sm process final states interval @xmath49 accepted background for @xmath45 other sources backgrounds results instrumental background calorimeter noise suppressed cut transverse energy jetscalorimeter noise negligible for jets transverse energy than 40 gev calorimeter noise not only jet efficiency global efficiency of 0.6 prudent value considered background processes : @xmath51 backgrounds arranged into three classes @xmath52 @xmath53 with @xmath49 for final charged particles@xmath53 @xmath55 @xmath49 for final charged leptons for final quarks missing 40% events from reactions @xmath53 @xmath57 missing biggest contribution from electron - positron production with @xmath49 cross section peaked due to small mass electron @xmath58 pole structure sum of background cross sections is @xmath59 pb @xmath7 @xmath60 pb for @xmath6 estimated 95% confidence level bounds using one - parameter @xmath61 test without systematic error prediction about missing number of events is @xmath62 @xmath63 integrated luminosity 0.9 qed two - photon survival probability @xmath64 sum of background cross sections test sm prediction @xmath61 function : @xmath65 @xmath66 is cross section process @xmath67 @xmath68 statistical errortables tab1 tab2 show 95% c.l . upper bounds of couplings @xmath69 @xmath70 diagonal elements @xmath29 constrained by experiments assume @xmath31 diagonal limits worse than current experimental limits bounds on @xmath71 order of @xmath72 7 orders more restrictive than lep bound statistical analysis background processes main contribution by processes @xmath73 with @xmath49 other backgrounds small contributions large background spoil limits background cross section 4 times larger than sum backgrounds limits spoiled factor of 2 still at order of @xmath72 subprocess @xmath74 described by 8 tree - level diagrams @xmath25 @xmath26 couplings fig analytical expression for amplitude square lengthy depends on couplings @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 assume @xmath78 ; @xmath79 @xmath80 absent in sm tree - level sm contribution originated from loop diagrams 5 vertices sm contribution suppressed set bounds on couplings using poisson distribution expected number of events calculated considering leptonic decay channel of z boson as signal @xmath81 @xmath82 or @xmath83 place cut @xmath48 for final state @xmath84 upper bounds couplings @xmath85 in tables tab3 tab4 subprocess @xmath74 restrictive bounds on @xmath87 coupling @xmath88 both processes potential probe coupling @xmath89 forward detector equipments study lhc high energy photon collider detect scattered protons after collision deep inelastic scattering proton structure discerned from photo - production processes opportunity probe electromagnetic properties neutrinos clean environment @xmath90 @xmath91 reactions at lhc probe neutrino - two photon couplings better sensitivity current limits former improves sensitivity limits factor @xmath92 latter improves @xmath93 v. castellani s. deglinnocenti astrophys . j. 402, 574 ( 1993 ). catelan pacheco horvath astrophys 461 231 ( 1996 ) ph/9509062 a. ayala dolivo m. torres phys 59 111901 ( 1999 )/9804230 r. barbieri mohapatra phys . lett 61, 27 ( 1988 ). lattimer j. cooperstein phys . lett61 23 1988 heger friedland giannotti cirigliano astrophys 696 608 2009 arxiv:0809.4703 astro - ph cms collaboration physics design report volume i editor d. acosta cern lhcc 2006 - 001 upper bounds couplings @xmath89 @xmath71 process @xmath94 integrated lhc luminosities detector acceptance @xmath7 @xmath33 1 gev limits @xmath89 units bohr magneton tab1 cols="^
| 0.509174
| 3,181
| 1,601
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,780
|
the sdss has been a gold mine for understanding properties of the milky way .
below , in the watershed , there remain small nuggets to be found flowing from the deepest recesses of the mine .
the sdss - dr9 included the release of the flux- and wavelength - calibrated , individual spectra which were subsequently combined to form the composite spectra found in previous sdss data releases .
these single - epoch spectra ( ses ) can be analyzed to find flux and spectral line variability , and to probe aspects of phase variations for objects such as rrl stars . for @xmath0 of the spectra in the rrl color range , ses were taken on separate nights , sometimes weeks apart .
the remaining dataset have a time baseline of 0.75 to 1.5 hours and consist of 4 - 7 separate exposures . in my talk
i will present details of our project to detect variability and to constrain the pulsation phase at the time of observation .
i will discuss our auto - detection technique that uses division of all ses for a given star to search for variations in the flux , the hydrogen balmer lines and the caii k line .
this procedure is being tested against known variables and non - variable stars within stripe 82 to determine the identification effectiveness as a function of signal - to - noise , rrl type , and time baseline length .
i will also discuss the use of empirical standard star templates to predict pulsation phase from the combination of hydrogen line strengths and radial velocity variations .
our ultimate goal is to combine the ses analysis with our new metallicity calibration in order to increase the number of rrl stars that have reliable metallicity determinations and which can then be used to probe the structure of the milky way halo .
[ 1996/06/01 ]
|
the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) ( york , 2000 ) and sloan extension for galactic understanding and exploration ( segue ) ( yanny , 2009 ) have spectral observations of @xmath1 stars as of data release 9 ( dr9 ) ( ahn , 2012 ) .
these spectral observations include tens of thousands of stars that fall in the color range of the rrl instability strip , including several thousand rrl variables .
these spectra are very useful in determining the rrl radial velocity and can be used to determine the overall metallicity .
a typical spectrum from the sdss database is a composite spectrum produced from multiple single observations .
these single observations sometimes fall on the same night but often include observations that occur days and even weeks apart . combining these observations
allows for easy removal of cosmic ray events and helps to increase the signal - to - noise ratio for the star .
this is a very useful technique if the star is non - variable . for variable stars , and in particular the rrl stars , combining single spectra can distort the spectral line profiles , which change as a function of pulsation phase .
the sdss - dr9 includes the flux- and wavelength - calibrated , single - epoch spectra ( ses ) that were used to create the final composite spectrum . with this data in hand
we now have the ability to measure line strengths that are not distorted from the combining effect and to use the changes in line strength from multiple ses to identify variables and estimate pulsation phase at the time of observation . as rrls pulsate and their surface temperature changes ,
there is significant change to the strength of absorption lines .
in particular , the hydrogen balmer lines and the caii k line undergo substantial changes as a function of pulsation phase . in general ,
the strength of the balmer lines are anti - correlated to the strength of the caii k line , which shrinks as the temperature increases .
this anti - correlation can be exploited in the ses spectra to identify rrl variables .
furthermore , the amount of change between ses observations can be used to estimate the phase information for the variable .
the phase is of crucial importance for metallicity determination , because at certain pulsation phases particularly during light - rise time
shocks in the photosphere cause substantial distortions in the balmer lines , making it difficult to determine precise metallicity . in this talk we present results for our identification and phase estimation technique by comparing to known sdss variables in stripe 82 ( sesar , 2010 ) .
here we constrain the test to rrab variables and to ses that are taken in a single night .
future testing will include rrc variables and stars with ses spectra taken on multiple nights .
we have chosen eleven rrab variables from stripe 82 , with phase information reported in the sesar paper .
we also chose five stars that are non - variable to test our ability to detect variability .
all test stars have ses taken on a single night with observations taken consecutively .
the number of ses range from a minimum of three spectra up to seven .
table 1 lists these stars , their period , the time base line of observation ( t - base ) , the percent of the phase covered by the ses , and the magnitude of the star .
the ability to detect variation will be a function of t - base line , the period of the variable , and the signal - to - noise of the ses spectra .
a further constraint is the pulsation phase during the observation because changes in line strengths occur more rapidly at certain pulsation phases . for the non - variable stars , we chose ses that covered similar ranges in t - base and signal - to - noise to test for null detections .
rccccc 0989 - 52468 - 0032 & ab & 0.580767811 & 0.7139 & 0.0512 & 18.388 + 0702 - 52178 - 0100 & ab & 0.649984725 & 0.7522 & 0.0482 & 17.845 + 0402 - 51793 - 0117 & ab & 0.797848004 & 0.6364 & 0.0332 & 15.763 + 1918 - 53240 - 0121 & ab & 0.512230079 & 0.6528 & 0.0531 & 14.782 + 1507 - 53763 - 0132 & ab & 0.722990487 & 0.6308 & 0.0364 & 17.946 + 1502 - 53741 - 0170 & ab & ... & 1.7386 & 0.1200 & 16.383 + 0380 - 51792 - 0237 & ab & 0.569410914 & 0.8797 & 0.0644 & 18.204 + 2636 - 54082 - 0248 & ab & 0.542616712 & 2.2861 & 0.1755 & 17.998 + 0371 - 52078 - 0334 & ab & 0.622160962 & 0.6355 & 0.0425 & 16.913 + 0685 - 52203 - 0526 & ab & 0.793004216 & 1.0889 & 0.0572 & 18.850 + 0701 - 52179 - 0570 & ab & 0.557696402 & 0.6147 & 0.0459 & 17.693 + 1903 - 53357 - 0185 & nv & ... & 1.3319 & ... & ... + 1918 - 53240 - 0241 & nv & ... & 0.6528 & ... & ... + 1084 - 52591 - 0422 & nv & ... & 0.7633 & ... & ... + 1138 - 53228 - 0444 & nv & ... & 1.1444 & ... & ... + 1133 - 52993 - 0463 & nv & ... & 1.0608 & ... & ... -0.4 in to test for variability , we use empirical templates obtained from observations of metallicity standard rrab stars .
these spectra were taken at mcdonald observatory on the 2.1meter telescope using the es2 , low - resolution spectrograph .
these stars are being used in our metallicity calibration , which has been reported at this meeting by e. spalding .
the spectra were taken over large portions of the pulsation phase .
currently none of the stars have complete phase coverage , so for this study we have used a combination of templates from the variable stars x ari , tt lyn , tw lyn and tu uma . the combination of these stars gives full phase coverage with a phase resolution of @xmath2 . in our technique
we make use of the quotient spectrum , the division of one spectrum by another , to characterize the changes in spectral line strength in a given phase range . because our current template sample is constructed from stars with various metallicities , we only divide spectra for a given star to construct the phase range .
this minimizes effects of metallicity , particularly on the caii k line , for the quotient templates .
figures 1 and 2 show two quotient templates at different phases .
the quotient spectra would have a value of unity , across all wavelengths , if there were no spectral changes . in figure 1
the hydrogen balmer lines can be seen in `` absorption '' ( decreasing line strength ) while the caii k line shows an `` emission '' peak ( increasing line strength ) .
the blend of caii h / h@xmath3 displays broad wings and an `` emission '' peak at the line center , clearly showing the anti - correlated nature of the caii lines and the balmer lines . in figure 2 , during the light - rise phase , the effect is reversed with the balmer lines growing while the caii lines are shrinking . comparing these two figures
, it becomes evident how the phase can be estimated , based on the sign and strength of the spectral features from the quotient templates . to test our technique
we make a quotient spectrum from the division of the first and final ses spectra for a given star .
a particularly good result can be seen in figure 3 . here
the black line is the quotient spectrum for a stripe82 variable , while the red line is the best matched quotient template .
it is clear in this figure that the star is a variable and at a phase approaching 1.0 .
to quantify the signal for the variable candidates we perform a fft ( iraf task fxcor ) to correlate the template and observed quotient spectra .
we use a welch fourier filter with a wavenumber range of @xmath4 , where the low frequency cutoff removes large scale variations produced by the flux normalization and a high frequency limit to remove high frequency noise .
we further constrained our correlation peak to the velocity range of @xmath5 km / s , to eliminate correlation peaks that would have unrealistic velocities for stars in the galaxy .
the tonry - davis ratio , which is the ratio of correlation height to anti - symmetric noise ( tonry & davis , 1979 ) , is used to determine the significance of the correlation peak and to select the best quotient template to match the observed data .
figure 4 shows the tdr value as a function of various phase templates .
the filled black circles are the stripe82 variable and the black - hatched squares are the auto - correlation for the @xmath6 template relative to all template spectra .
the red circles and red squares are the anti - correlation responses for the stripe82 star and the template , respectively .
the anti - correlation is found to be inverting the templates , and thus the greater the negative peak , the stronger the anti - correlation .
it is clear that the stripe82 star has virtually the same template response as the template with @xmath7 .
this increases the likelihood that the tdr peak is real and not a random variation . as a final test
, we use the velocities from the star s spectra , and test if the velocity from the peak correlation of the quotient spectra , yield a consistent result . for this strong signal star
it is clear that the tdr peak occurs at the velocities of the individual spectra ( figure 5 ) . in cases where the tdr peak is weak and only due to noise variations ,
it is less likely that the velocity of the correlation peak will match the velocity of the single spectra .
this constraint adds more certainty to the significance of the tdr peak .
both the auto - correlation and the radial velocity constraints must be met in order for the variability result to be considered positive .
of the eleven rrab stars that we tested , only four were found to have a significant tdr peak .
the other seven variables failed either the auto - response criteria , the radial velocity criteria , or both .
of the six non - variable stars that we tested , all six failed the variability test .
figure 6 is a plot of the tdr peak height as a function of the time baseline .
the black circles are the positive detections and the red circles are the null results .
the green squares represent the non - variable stars . in general
the null rrab detections are for time baselines that are less than 45 minutes , indicating that the time baseline length is an important criteria for variability detection .
the low peak height of the non - variable stars shows that the height of the tdr peak is an indicator of variability , as expected .
figure 7 shows the results for the predicted phase versus the phase computed from the ephemeris data of sesar .
the four positive detections are close to the one - to - one correspondence line , although there appears to be a systematic shift for the two stars with the smallest phase .
the null detections appear more randomly distributed in the plot .
this suggests that for positive detections it will be possible to estimate the phase to within @xmath2 or so .
it should be noted , however , that the positive detections were found to be during the phases close to maximum light , when the spectral changes occur the most rapidly .
this suggests that detections are most likely to be found during phases of rapid spectral line change .
this is again expected , given the short time baseline for most of these stars .
we find that using our empirical templates it is possible to detect variability and estimate phase for rrab stars .
when the ses are all constrained to a single night , the success rate is mainly determined by the time baseline and , in particular , the percentage of the pulsation period that is represented by the data .
for all the positive detections , a time baseline that is greater than @xmath8 of the pulsation period is needed to return a positive result .
it is also most likely that positive results will occur for phases near the maximum light , when the spectral changes are occurring rapidly .
we see no strong relation between positive detections and the signal - to - noise ratio of the spectra .
this suggests that the technique will work for very low signal - to - noise spectra .
we have not tested the rrc variables at this point , but the shorter periods will make even the shortest time baselines a large percentage ( @xmath9 ) of the pulsation phase .
this should increase in the number of positive detections for single - night , ses , although the spectral changes are not as extreme as the rrab stars .
we have also not tested the @xmath10 of the stars that have ses taken on multiple nights .
for these we expect a much higher frequency of positive detections , but the phase determination will be more difficult due to an unknown number of pulsation phases between the observations .
this july we are continuing the observation of standard rrl variables .
our goal is to observe an rrab and rrc through the entire pulsation period and at high time resolution ( @xmath11 of pulsation period ) this should increase the precision of the phase estimation .
|
sloan digital sky survey york 2000 sloan extension for galactic understanding exploration yanny 2009 ) have spectral observations of @xmath1 stars data release 9 ahn 2012 observations include tens thousands stars in color range rrl instability strip several thousand rrl variables spectra useful rrl radial velocity overall metallicity typical spectrum from sdss database is composite spectrum from multiple observations observations same days weeks apart combining observations allows removal cosmic ray events signal - to - noise ratio star useful if star non - variable for variable stars rrl stars combining spectra distort spectral line profiles pulsation phase sdss - dr9 includes flux- wavelength - calibrated single - epoch spectra final composite spectrum data measure line strengths not distorted from combining use changes from multiple ses to identify variables estimate pulsation phase rrls pulsate surface temperature changes strength absorption lines hydrogen balmer lines caii k line undergo changes pulsation phase strength lines anti - correlated to caii k line shrinks as temperature increases anti - correlation ses spectra identify rrl variableschange between ses observations phase information variable phase for metallicity determination pulsation shocks photosphere cause distortions balmer lines precise metallicity results identification phase estimation technique comparing sdss variables in stripe 82 2010 constrain test to rrab variables ses single night future testing rrc variables stars with multiple nights chosen eleven rrab variables from stripe 82 phase information five stars non - variable to variability all test stars have ses single night consecutively ses range three up to seven table 1 lists stars period time base line observation percent phase covered by ses magnitude star detect variation of t - base line period variable signal - to - noise of ses spectra constraint pulsation phase line strengths non - variable stars chose ses similar ranges in t - base signal - to - noise for null detections 0989 - 52468 - 0032 0.580767811 0.7139 0.0512 18.388 + 0702 - 52178 - 0100 0.649984725 0.7522 0.0482 17.845 + 0402 - 51793 - 0117 0.797848004 0.6364 0.0332 15.763 + 1918 - 53240 - 0121 0.512230079 0.6528 0.0531 14.782 1507 - 53763 - 0132 0.722990487 0.6308 0.0364 17.946 1502 - 53741 - 0170 1.7386 0.1200 16.383 0380 - 51792 - 0237 0.569410914 0.8797 0.0644 18.204 2636 - 54082 - 0248 0.542616712 2.2861 0.1755 17.998 0371 - 52078 - 0334 0.622160962 0.0425 16.913 0685 - 52203 - 0526 0.793004216 1.0889 0.0572 18.850 0701 - 52179 - 0570 0.557696402 0.6147 0.0459 17.693 1903 - 53357 - 0185 1.3319 1918 - 53240 - 0241 0.6528 1084 - 52591 - 0422 0.7633 1138 - 53228 - 0444 1.1444 1133 - 52993 - 0463 1.0608 -0.4 variability templates metallicity standard rrab stars spectra mcdonald observatory 2.1meter telescope - spectrograph metallicity calibration spalding spectra pulsation phase complete phase coverage templates stars x ari tt lyn tw lyn tu uma full phase coverage resolution @xmath2 our technique quotient spectrum changes spectral line strength phase range current template sample stars metallicities divide spectra for star phase range minimizes effects metallicity on caii k line for templates figures 1 and 2 show two quotient templates at different phases spectra unity if no spectral changes hydrogen balmer lines in absorption decreasing line strength caii k line emission peak increasing strength blend of caii h / h@xmath3 broad wings emission peak at line center anti - correlated nature caii lines balmer lines figure 2 light - rise phase effect reversed balmer lines growing caii lines shrinking comparing figures phase estimated based on strength spectral features from quotient templates test technique make quotient spectrum from division first and final ses spectra for star good result in figure 3 black line quotient spectrum for stripe82 variable red line best matched quotient template star variable at phase approaching 1.0 to quantify signal for variable candidates correlate template and observed quotient spectrause welch fourier filter wavenumber range @xmath4 low frequency cutoff removes large scale variations high frequency limit high frequency noise constrained correlation peak to velocity @xmath5 km / s eliminate unrealistic velocities stars tonry - davis ratio ratio correlation height to anti - symmetric noise 1979 used significance correlation peak select best quotient template data figure 4 shows tdr value function phase templates filled black circles stripe82 variable black - hatched squares auto - correlation @xmath6 template red circles squares anti - correlation responses stripe82 star template anti - correlation templates greater negative peak stronger anti - correlation stripe82 star same template response template @xmath7 increases likelihood tdr peak real not random variation final test use velocities from star s spectra test peak correlation quotient spectra consistent result strong signal star tdr peak occurs at velocities individual spectra figure 5 ) tdr peak weak due to noise variations less likely velocity correlation peak match velocity single spectra constraint adds certainty significance tdr peakauto - correlation radial velocity constraints for variability result positive eleven rrab stars tested four significant tdr peak other seven variables failed auto - response radial velocity both six non - variable stars all six failed variability test figure 6 plot tdr peak height time baseline black circles positive detections red circles null results green squares non - variable stars null rrab detections for time baselines less than 45 minutes time baseline length important criteria for variability detection low peak height of non - variable stars shows tdr peak indicator of variability figure 7 results for predicted phase versus phase computed from ephemeris data sesar four positive detections close to one - to - one correspondence line systematic shift for two stars with smallest phase null detections randomly distributed positive detections possible to estimate phase to within @xmath2 positive detections found during phases close to maximum light spectral changes detections likely rapid spectral line change short time baseline for using empirical templates possible to detect variability estimate phase for rrab stars to single night success rate determined by time baseline percentage of pulsation period represented datapositive detections time baseline greater than @xmath8 pulsation period needed positive result likely positive results phases near maximum light spectral changes rapidly no strong relation between positive detections signal - to - noise ratio suggests technique for low signal - to - noise spectra not tested rrc variables shorter periods time baselines large percentage @xmath9 ) pulsation phase increase positive detections for single - night ses spectral changes not extreme as rrab stars not tested @xmath10 stars taken multiple nights expect higher frequency positive detections phase determination difficult unknown number pulsation phases continuing observation of standard rrl variables goal observe rrab rrc through entire pulsation period high time resolution @xmath11 increase precision phase estimation
| 0.445248
| 2,972
| 1,560
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,781
|
the multiple point principle ( mpp ) can be used to suppress non diagonal flavour transitions and cp violation in the two higgs doublet extension of the standard model .
we discuss the quasi
fixed point scenario in the mpp inspired two higgs doublet model which leads to the enhanced production of higgs particles at the lhc if the mpp scale @xmath0 .
cern - ph - th/2007 - 193 +
|
the violation of cp invariance and the existence of tree
level flavor changing neutral currents ( fcnc ) are generic features of @xmath1 theories with two higgs doublets .
indeed the couplings @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 in the higgs potential of the two higgs doublet model ( 2hdm ) @xmath6 + \frac{\lambda_1}{2 } |h_1|^4 + \frac{\lambda_2}{2}|h_2|^4+\lambda_3 |h_1|^2 |h_2|^2\\ + \lambda_4|h_1^{\dagger}h_2|^2 + \biggl[\frac{\lambda_5}{2}(h_1^{\dagger}h_2)^2 + \lambda_6 |h_1|^2 ( h_1^{\dagger}h_2)+\lambda_7 |h_2|^2(h_1^{\dagger}h_2)+h.c .
\biggr ] \end{array } \label{1}\ ] ] can be complex inducing cp violation . although one can eliminate the violation of cp invariance and tree
level fcnc transitions by imposing a discrete @xmath7 symmetry , such a symmetry leads to the formation of domain walls in the early universe which would create unacceptably large anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background radiation . here
we consider the multiple point principle ( mpp ) @xcite as a possible mechanism for the suppression of fcnc and cp violation effects .
mpp postulates the existence of the maximal number of phases with the same energy density which are allowed by a given theory @xcite .
when applied to the 2hdm the multiple point principle implies the existence of a large set of degenerate vacua at some high energy scale @xmath8 ( mpp scale ) that can be parametrised as @xmath9 where @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath12 while @xmath13 is an arbitrary parameter . according to the mpp vacua at the electroweak and mpp scales
must have the same vacuum energy density .
the degeneracy of the mpp scale vacua can be achieved only if the lagrangian for the higgs fermion interactions is invariant under symmetry transformations ( see @xcite ) : @xmath14 where @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 are quark and lepton eigenstates which couple to @xmath18 while @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 are fermion eigenstates that interact with @xmath22 . in eq .
( [ 3 ] ) the subscript @xmath23 denote right - handed fermion fields .
two global @xmath24 symmetries ( [ 3 ] ) forbid non diagonal flavour transitions at the tree level
. moreover these symmetries lead to the vanishing of @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 in the higgs potential ( [ 1 ] ) that cause cp nonconservation in the 2hdm .
the mixing term @xmath25 , which is not forbidden by the mpp , softly breaks custodial global symmetries but does not create new sources of cp violation or fcnc transitions .
the degeneracy of the physical and mpp scale vacua requires higgs and yukawa couplings to be adjusted so that an appropriate cancellation among the quartic terms in the higgs potential ( [ 1 ] ) takes place .
such cancellation becomes possible only if @xmath26 and the combination of the higgs self couplings @xmath27 as well as its beta function @xmath28 go to zero at the scale @xmath8 @xcite . at moderate values of @xmath29 where @xmath30 and @xmath31 are vacuum expectation values of @xmath22 and @xmath18 in the physical vacuum ,
the last two mpp conditions can be written as follows @xcite @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the top quark yukawa coupling .
thus @xmath34 and @xmath35 are not independent parameters in the considered model . as a result
the mpp inspired 2hdm has less free parameters than the 2hdm of type ii and therefore can be regarded as a minimal non supersymmetric two higgs doublet extension of the sm .
it is also worth noting here that the mpp conditions ( [ 4 ] ) are satisfied identically in the mssm above the supersymmetry breaking scale .
the mpp conditions ( [ 4 ] ) must be supplemented by the vacuum stability requirements , i.e. @xmath36 and @xmath37 , which have to be fulfilled everywhere from @xmath38 to @xmath39 .
otherwise another minimum of the higgs potential ( [ 1 ] ) with negative vacuum energy density arises at some intermediate scale , preventing the consistent realisation of the mpp in the 2hdm .
the renormalisation group ( rg ) flow of all couplings in the mpp inspired 2hdm is determined by @xmath40 , @xmath41 and @xmath33 . when @xmath42 the solutions of the rg equations for the top quark yukawa coupling are concentrated in the vicinity of the quasi
fixed point at the electroweak scale . the value of @xmath43 that corresponds to the quasi
fixed point scenario depends mainly on the mpp scale @xmath8 .
it varies from @xmath44 to @xmath45 when @xmath8 changes from @xmath46 to @xmath47 @xcite . at large values of @xmath33
the mpp and vacuum stability conditions constrain @xmath48 very strongly .
our numerical studies show that for @xmath49 and @xmath50 the ratio @xmath51 can vary only within a very narrow interval from @xmath52 to @xmath53 if @xmath54 .
this ensures the convergence of the solutions of the rg equations for @xmath55 to the quasi
fixed points .
+ absolute values of the relative couplings @xmath56 of the higgs scalars to the top quark in the quasi
fixed point scenario as a function of @xmath57 for @xmath58 .
solid and dashed dotted curves correspond to the lightest and heaviest cp even higgs states .
, title="fig : " ] + absolute values of the relative couplings @xmath56 of the higgs scalars to the top quark in the quasi
fixed point scenario as a function of @xmath57 for @xmath58 .
solid and dashed dotted curves correspond to the lightest and heaviest cp even higgs states .
, title="fig : " ] + + the higgs spectrum of the two higgs doublet extension of the sm contains two charged and three neutral scalar states .
because in the mpp inspired 2hdm cp invariance is preserved one of the neutral higgs bosons is always cp odd while the two others are cp even .
the qualitative pattern of the higgs spectrum depends very strongly on the mass of the pseudoscalar higgs boson @xmath57 ( see fig . 1 ) .
when @xmath59 the masses of charged , cp odd and heaviest cp even higgs bosons are almost degenerate around @xmath57 . in the considered limit
the lightest cp even higgs boson mass @xmath60 attains its maximal value which is determined by @xmath61 and @xmath43 . for each mpp scale @xmath8 one can compute the values of the higgs self
couplings at the electroweak scale and @xmath43 near the quasi fixed point .
because at large values of the pseudoscalar mass @xmath60 is almost independent of @xmath57 , the upper bound on the lightest higgs scalar mass depends predominantly on the scale @xmath8 . when the mpp scale is high such dependence is relatively weak .
if @xmath62 the mass of the lightest higgs particle in the quasi fixed point scenario does not exceed @xmath63 @xcite .
however at low mpp scales @xmath0 the theoretical restriction on @xmath60 reaches @xmath64 .
the lightest higgs scalar in the considered case is predominantly a sm like higgs boson , since its relative coupling to a @xmath65 pair is rather close to unity . nevertheless at low
mpp scales the quasi
fixed point scenario leads to large values of the relative coupling of the lightest higgs scalar to the top quark resulting in the enhanced production of this particle at hadron colliders ( see fig . 2 ) .
thus the analysis of production and decay rates of the sm like higgs boson at the lhc should make possible the distinction between the quasi
fixed point scenario in the mpp inspired 2hdm with low scale @xmath8 , the sm and the mssm even if extra higgs states are relatively heavy , i.e. @xmath66 .
we have argued that the mpp assumption allows us to suppress fcnc and cp violating phenomena in the 2hdm .
when @xmath67 the solutions of the rg equations in the mpp inspired 2hdm converge to the quasi
fixed point , leading to stringent restrictions on the lightest higgs scalar mass . in the quasi
fixed point scenario the higgs couplings to the @xmath68quark can be significantly larger than in the sm , which allows us to test this scenario at hadron colliders . rn acknowledge support from the shefc grant hr03020 supa 36878 .
9 bennett d l and nielsen h b 1994 _ int .
phys . _ a * 9 * 5155 bennett d l , froggatt c d and nielsen h b 1995 _ perspectives in particle physics94 _ ed d klabucar , i picek and d tadi ( singapore : world scientific ) p 255 ( _ preprint _ hep - ph/9504294 ) froggatt c d , nevzorov r , nielsen h b and thompson d 2008 on the origin of @xmath7 symmetry in the two - higgs doublet extension of the sm _ preprint _
arxiv:0806.3190 [ hep - ph ] froggatt c d , laperashvili l , nevzorov r , nielsen h b and sher m 2004 the two - higgs doublet model and the multiple point principle _ preprint _ hep - ph/0412333 froggatt c d , laperashvili l , nevzorov r , nielsen h b and sher m 2006 _ phys .
_ d * 73 * 095005 froggatt c d , nevzorov r , nielsen h b and thompson d 2007 _ phys .
_ b * 657 * 95
|
violation cp invariance tree level flavor changing neutral currents features @xmath1 theories two higgs doublets couplings @xmath2 in higgs potential doublet model @xmath6 +\frac\lambda_1}{2|h_1|^4_2^4\lambda_3 |h_1^2_4|h_1_2|^2\lambda_5}{2}(h_1_2)^2 +\lambda_6 |h_1|^2+\lambda_7 |h_2|^2(h_1_2)+h{array{1 complex inducing cp violation eliminate violation cp invariance tree level fcnc transitions discrete @xmath7 symmetry leads to domain walls large anisotropies in cosmic microwave background radiation multiple point principle ( mpp ) @xcite mechanism for suppression fcnc cp violation effects postulates maximal number phases same energy density allowed by theory @xciteapplied 2hdm multiple point principle implies degenerate vacua at high energy scale @xmath8 mpp scale parametrised as @xmath9 arbitrary parameter vacua at electroweak mpp scales same energy density degeneracy if lagrangian higgs fermion interactions invariant under symmetry transformations @xmath14 quark lepton eigenstates couple to @xmath18 fermion eigenstates interact with @xmath22 subscript @xmath23 right - handed fermion fields @xmath24 symmetries forbid non diagonal flavour transitions at tree level symmetries lead to vanishing of @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 in higgs potential cause cp nonconservation in 2hdm mixing term @xmath25 not forbidden by breaks global symmetries create new sources cp violation fcnc transitions degeneracy of physical mpp scale vacua requires higgs yukawa couplings cancellation quartic terms higgs potential cancellation possible if @xmath26 higgs couplings @xmath27 beta function @xmath28 go to zero at scale @xmath8moderate values @xmath29 vacuum expectation values @xmath22 physical vacuum last two mpp conditions @xmath32 @xmath33 top quark yukawa coupling @xmath34 not independent parameters model mpp inspired 2hdm less free parameters 2hdm type ii minimal non supersymmetric two higgs doublet extension mpp conditions satisfied mssm above supersymmetry breaking scale supplemented vacuum stability requirements @xmath36 @xmath37 fulfilled @xmath38 to @xmath39 otherwise minimum higgs potential negative vacuum energy density arises intermediate scale preventing consistent realisation mpp 2hdm renormalisation group rg ) flow couplings mpp 2hdm determined @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath33 @xmath42 solutions rg equations top quark yukawa coupling quasi fixed point electroweak scale value @xmath43 quasi fixed point scenario depends mpp scale @xmath8 varies @xmath44 to @xmath45 @xmath8 changes @xmath46 @xmath47 large values @xmath33 mpp vacuum stability conditions constrain @xmath48numerical studies show @xmath49 ratio @xmath51 narrow interval from @xmath52 to @xmath53 ensures convergence solutions rg equations @xmath55 quasi fixed points absolute values relative couplings @xmath56 higgs scalars top quark fixed point function @xmath57 @xmath58 curves correspond lightest heaviest cp even higgs states values couplings @xmath56 higgs scalars top quark function @xmath57 curves lightest heaviest cp even higgs states higgs spectrum contains two charged three neutral scalar states invariance one neutral higgs bosons cp odd two others cp even qualitative pattern higgs spectrum depends on mass pseudoscalar higgs boson @xmath57 @xmath59 masses charged heaviest cp even higgs bosons degenerate around @xmath57 lightest cp even higgs boson mass @xmath60 maximal value determined by @xmath61 @xmath43 each mpp scale @xmath8 compute values higgs self couplings at electroweak scale @xmath43 near quasi fixed pointlarge values pseudoscalar mass @xmath60 independent @xmath57 upper bound lightest higgs scalar mass depends scale @xmath8 mpp scale high dependence weak @xmath62 lightest higgs particle quasi fixed point exceed @xmath63 low mpp scales restriction @xmath60 reaches @xmath64 lightest higgs scalar sm like higgs boson relative coupling @xmath65 pair close unity low mpp scales quasi fixed point scenario leads large values relative coupling lightest higgs scalar top quark enhanced production at hadron colliders fig 2 analysis production decay rates sm higgs boson distinction quasi fixed point scenario mpp low scale @xmath8 extra higgs states heavy @xmath66 mpp assumption suppress fcnc cp violating phenomena 2hdm @xmath67 solutions rg equations converge quasi fixed point stringent restrictions lightest higgs scalar mass quasi fixed point scenario higgs couplings to @xmath68quark larger sm test hadron colliders support shefc grant hr03020 bennett d l nielsen h 1994 int. phys* 9 5155 bennett froggatt nielsen 1995 particle physics94 picek singapore world scientific p 255 preprint hep - ph/9504294 froggatt nevzorov nielsen thompson d 2008 origin @xmath7 symmetry two - higgs doublet extension arxiv:0806.3190 hep - ph froggatt laperashvili nevzorov nielsen sher m 2004 two - higgs doublet model multiple point principle hep - ph/0412333 froggatt nielsen sher 2006 phys . 73 * 095005 froggatt nevzorov nielsen thompson d 2007 . 657 * 95
| 0.350041
| 2,399
| 1,252
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,802
|
in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly .
the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .
|
we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography .
it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly
flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
|
recorded flight fly take off landing digital high speed photography dynamics flexible wings different fly flew freely in big box not tethered
| 0.065449
| 53
| 24
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,824
|
the @xmath0 and @xmath1 azimuthal modulations of the unpolarized hadron semi - inclusive deep inelastic scattering cross section are sensitive to the quark intrinsic transverse momentum and transverse spin .
these modulations have been measured at in a fully differential way by means of a 4-dimensional unfolding procedure to correct for instrumental effects .
results have been extracted for hydrogen and deuterium targets and separately for positively and negatively charged pions and kaons , to access flavor - dependent information about the nucleon internal transverse degrees of freedom . in lepton - nucleon deep - inelastic scattering ( dis ) ,
the structure of the nucleon is probed by the interaction of a high energy lepton with a target nucleon , via , at kinematics , the exchange of one virtual photon .
if at least one of the produced hadrons is detected in coincidence with the scattered lepton , the reaction is called semi - inclusive deep - inelastic scattering ( sidis ) : @xmath2 where @xmath3 ( @xmath4 ) is the incident ( scattered ) lepton , @xmath5 is the target nucleon , @xmath6 is a detected hadron , @xmath7 is the target remnant and the quantities in parentheses in equation ( [ eq : one ] ) are the corresponding four - momenta . if unintegrated over the hadron momentum component transverse to the virtual photon direction @xmath8 ( fig .
[ fig : evento ] ) , the cross section can be written as @xcite : @xmath9 where @xmath10 , @xmath11 , are azimuthally dependent structure functions , and are related respectively to @xmath12 and @xmath13 modulations , with @xmath14 the azimuthal angle of the hadron production plane around the virtual - photon direction ( fig . [ fig : evento ] ) . in equation
[ eq : noncol_csec ] , the subscripts @xmath15 stand for unpolarized beam and target , @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) indicates the transverse ( longitudinal ) polarization of the virtual photon , @xmath18 is the electromagnetic coupling constant , @xmath19 with @xmath20 the target mass , @xmath21 , @xmath22 , and @xmath23 . here
@xmath24 and @xmath25 are respectively the negative squared four - momentum and the fractional energy of the virtual photon , @xmath26 the bjorken scaling variable and @xmath27 the fractional energy of the produced hadron . + between scattering plane , spanned by the in- and out - going lepton three - momenta ( @xmath28 , @xmath29 ) , and the hadron production plane , defined by the three - momenta of the virtual photon ( @xmath30 ) and produced hadron ( @xmath31 ) . ] among possible mechanisms , two are expected to give important contributions to the azimuthal dependence of the unpolarized cross section in the hadron transverse momentum range accessible at . the first one is called the _
cahn effect _
@xcite , a pure kinematic effect where the azimuthal modulations are generated by the non - zero intrinsic transverse motion of quarks . in the second mechanism , the _ boer - mulders effect _
@xcite , @xmath12 and @xmath13 modulations originate from the coupling of the quark intrinsic transverse momentum and intrinsic transverse spin , a kind of spin - orbit effect .
|
the results presented here are extracted from data collected at in the @xmath32 , data taking periods .
the fixed - target experiment ran for more than @xmath33 years until @xmath34 at the electron - positron storage ring of hera at desy .
the spectrometer @xcite was a forward - angle instrument consisting of two symmetric ( top , bottom ) halves above and below the horizontal plane defined by the lepton beam pipe .
it was characterized by very high efficiency ( about @xmath35 ) in electron - hadron separation , provided by a transition radiation detector , a preshower scintillation counter and an electromagnetic calorimeter .
in addition , a dual - radiator ring - imaging cherenkov ( rich ) detector provided hadron identification for momenta above 2 gev / c .
in order to study the new structure functions @xmath10 and @xmath11 defined in eq .
( [ eq : noncol_csec ] ) , a measure of the azimuthal modulation of the unpolarized cross section is needed , which can be extracted via the so - called @xmath36-moments : @xmath37 with @xmath38 and @xmath39 defined in equation [ eq : noncol_csec ] .
the extraction of these cosine moments from data is challenging because they couple to a number of _ experimental sources _ of azimuthal modulations , _
e.g. _ detector geometrical acceptance and higher - order qed effects ( _ radiative effects _ ) .
moreover , in the typical case , the event sample is binned only in one variable ( @xmath40-dimensional analysis ) , and integrated over the full range of all the other ones , but the mentioned structure functions and the instrumental spurious contributions depend on all the kinematic variables @xmath26 , @xmath25 , @xmath27 and @xmath8 simultaneously .
therefore a @xmath41-dimensional analysis is needed to take into account the correlations between the physical modulations and those spurious contributions , where the event sample is binned simultaneously in all the relevant variables .
therefore , a detailed monte carlo simulation of the experimental apparatus including radiative effects is used to define a @xmath41-d unfolding procedure @xcite that corrects the extracted cosine moments for radiative and instrumenthal effects .
the @xmath41-d unfolded yields are fit to the functional form : @xmath42 where @xmath43 and @xmath44 represent the desired moments .
one moment pair ( @xmath45 , @xmath46 ) for each of the @xmath41-d kinematic bins is extracted , and the moment dependences on a single kinematic variable is obtained projecting the @xmath41-d results onto the variable under study by weighting the moment in each bin with the corresponding @xmath47 cross section obtained from a monte carlo calculation -d unfolding and extraction procedure as well as on the projection versus the single variable can be found in @xcite . ] .
moments for positive ( upper panel ) and negative ( lower panel ) hadrons , extracted from hydrogen data projected versus the kinematic variables @xmath26 , @xmath25 , @xmath27 and @xmath8.,title="fig : " ] moments for positive ( upper panel ) and negative ( lower panel ) hadrons , extracted from hydrogen data projected versus the kinematic variables @xmath26 , @xmath25 , @xmath27 and @xmath8.,title="fig : " ] moments for positive ( upper panel ) and negative ( lower panel ) hadrons , extracted from hydrogen data projected versus the kinematic variables @xmath26 , @xmath25 , @xmath27 and @xmath8.,title="fig : " ] moments for positive ( upper panel ) and negative ( lower panel ) hadrons , extracted from hydrogen data projected versus the kinematic variables @xmath26 , @xmath25 , @xmath27 and @xmath8.,title="fig : " ]
the cross section unintegrated over hadron transverse momentum gives access to new exciting aspects of the nucleon structure , which are currently under intense theoretical investigations .
the cross section unintegrated over hadron transverse momentum gives access to new exciting aspects of the nucleon structure , which are currently under intense theoretical investigations .
however , as the extraction of unpolarized cosine moments is experimentally challenging , very few measurements have been performed to date , and , with exception of compass @xcite , most of them average out any possible flavor dependence @xcite . to date , this analysis at represents the most complete data set on the subject , and allows access to flavor dependent information on the nucleon internal transverse degrees of freedom .
pions moments projected in the relevant kinematic variables are shown in figure [ fig : pions ] for @xmath48 ( upper panel ) and @xmath49 ( middle panel ) moments .
the @xmath48 moments are found to be negative for both charged pions , but larger in magnitude for positive ones , while the @xmath49 moments show opposite sign for positive and negative pions : both modulations are clearly charge dependent , and this feature is considered as an evidence of a non - zero boer - mulders effect @xcite .
results for kaons are shown in figure [ fig : cosk ] for @xmath48 moments and figure [ fig : cos2k ] for @xmath49 moments .
the upper panels show results for positive kaons ( stars ) compared to positive pions ( squares ) and unidentified hadrons ( circles ) results , the lower panels the same comparison for negatively charged kaons , pions and hadrons . due to the poorer statistics of kaon event samples ,
the kaon results have been extracted in a reduced kinematic region with respect to the pion moments discussed above resulting in a smaller number of bins shown in the pictures .
the positive kaon @xmath48 moments ( figure [ fig : cosk ] ) are found to be negative and larger in magnitude than @xmath48 moments extracted for pions , while negative kaons behave similarly to negative pions , showing results compatible with zero .
the absolute value of kaon @xmath1 modulations are found to be larger in magnitude than pions ones . while pion @xmath1 modulations change sign between differently charged pions , kaon s modulations are negative for both kaon charges . in general
the hadrons have a similar trend as the pions but , particularly for the @xmath49 moments , the hadrons are shifted to lower values than the pions .
the discrepancy between hadrons and pions is consistent with the observed kaon moments .
+ the cosine modulations have been extracted also for data collected with deuterium target , and they are found to be compatible with hydrogen results , both for unidentified hadrons , pions and kaons .
this suggests that similar contributions arise from @xmath50 and @xmath51 quarks to the cosine modulations .
9 a. bacchetta and others , _ jhep _ 02:093 , 2007 .
r. n. cahn , _ phys .
_ b78:269 , 1978 .
r. n. cahn , _ phys .
_ d40:3107 , 1989 .
d. boer and p. j. mulders , _ phys
_ d57:5780 , 1998 .
k. ackerstaff and others , collaboration , _ nucl .
instrum . meth .
_ a417:230 , 1998 .
f. giordano , collaboration , proceedings of second international workshop on transverse polarisation phenomena in hard processes ( transversity 2008 ) ferrara , italy , may 28 - 31 2008 . "
g. cowan , _ statistical data analysis_. clarendon press , oxford , uk , 1998 . f. giordano and r. lamb , collaboration , aip conf .
, 1149:423 , 2009 , arxiv:0901.2438 .
g. sbrizzai , compass collaboration , these proceedings j. j. aubert et al . ,
emc collaboration , _ phys .
_ b130:118 , 1983 . m. arneodo et al . , emc collaboration , _ z. phys .
_ c34:277 , 1987 . j. breitweg et al . , zeus collaboration , _ phys .
_ b481:199 , 2000 .
m. r. adams , e665 collaboration , _ phys .
_ d48:5057 , 1993 . m. osipenko et al . , clas collaboration , _ phys .
_ d80:032004 , 2009 .
l. p. gamberg , g. r. goldstein and m. schlegel , _ phys .
_ d77:094016 , 2008 .
v. barone , a. prokudin and b. ma , _ phys .
_ d78:045022 , 2008 . b. zhang , z. lu , b. ma and i. schmidt _ phys .
_ d78:094035 , 2008 .
v. barone , a. prokudin and s. melis , _ phys .
_ d81:114026 , 2010
|
results extracted from data at @xmath32 fixed - target experiment ran @xmath33 years until @xmath34 at electron - positron storage ring of hera at desy spectrometer @xcite forward - angle instrument two symmetric halves above horizontal plane lepton beam pipe characterized by high efficiency @xmath35 ) in electron - hadron separation transition radiation detector preshower scintillation counter electromagnetic calorimeter dual - radiator ring - imaging detector provided hadron identification for momenta above 2 gev / c study new structure functions @xmath10 and @xmath11 measure of azimuthal modulation of unpolarized cross section needed extracted via @xmath36-moments @xmath37 extraction of moments challenging couple to experimental sources azimuthal modulations detector geometrical acceptance higher - order effects event sample binned in one variable @xmath40-dimensional integrated over range structure functions instrumental spurious contributions depend on kinematic variables @xmath26 @xmath8 @xmath41-dimensional analysis needed correlations between physical modulations spurious contributions event sample binned simultaneously in all variablesdetailed monte carlo simulation of experimental apparatus including radiative effects @xmath41-d unfolding procedure corrects extracted cosine moments for radiative and instrumenthal effects @xmath41-d unfolded yields fit to functional form : @xmath42 @xmath43 and @xmath44 represent desired moments one moment pair ( @xmath45 , @xmath46 ) for each @xmath41-d kinematic bins extracted moment dependences on single kinematic variable obtained projecting @xmath41-d results onto variable under study by weighting moment in each bin with corresponding @xmath47 cross section obtained from monte carlo calculation -d unfolding and extraction procedure projection versus single variable found in @xcite moments for positive and negative ( lower ) hadrons extracted from hydrogen data projected versus kinematic variables @xmath26 @xmath25 @xmath27 @xmath8. moments for moments for hadrons cross section unintegrated over hadron transverse momentum gives access to new aspects of nucleon structure under intense theoretical investigationscross section unintegrated over hadron transverse momentum access to new aspects nucleon structure under theoretical investigations extraction of unpolarized cosine moments challenging few measurements performed most average flavor dependence this analysis represents most complete data set allows access to flavor dependent information on nucleon internal transverse degrees freedom pions moments projected in kinematic variables shown in figure for @xmath48 and @xmath49 moments @xmath48 moments negative for both charged pions larger magnitude for positive ones @xmath49 moments opposite for positive negative pions both modulations charge dependent evidence non - zero boer - mulders effect @xcite results for kaons shown in figure @xmath48 and @xmath49 upper panels show results for positive kaons to pions negatively charged kaons poorer statistics kaon event samples results extracted in reduced kinematic region smaller number of bins pictures positive kaon @xmath48 moments negative larger in magnitude than @xmath48 moments for pions negative kaons behave similarly to pions results compatible with zero absolute value of kaon @xmath1 modulations larger in magnitude than pionspion @xmath1 modulations change charged pions kaon modulations negative hadrons similar trend pions @xmath49 moments shifted lower values discrepancy between hadrons pions consistent with kaon moments cosine modulations extracted data deuterium target compatible with hydrogen results hadrons pions kaons similar contributions from @xmath50 @xmath51 quarks cosine modulations bacchetta others jhep 02:093 2007 r n. cahn phys. b78:269 1978 d40:3107 1989 boer p j mulders d57:5780 1998 ackerstaff others collaboration nucl a417:230 1998 f giordano collaboration proceedings second international workshop transverse polarisation phenomena processes 2008 ferrara italy may 28 - 31 2008 g. cowan statistical data analysis clarendon press oxford uk 1998 f giordano r. lamb collaboration aip conf. 1149:423 2009 arxiv:0901.2438 sbrizzai compass collaboration aubert collaboration. b130:118 1983 arneodo al. collaboration physc34:277 1987 breitweg zeus collaboration phys b481:199 2000 adams e665 collaboration d48:5057 1993 osipenko clas collaboration d80:032004 2009 p. gamberg. goldstein m. schlegel phys d77:094016 2008 barone a. prokudin b. ma d78:045022 2008. zhang z. lu b. ma i. schmidt d78:094035 2008 barone a. prokudin s. melis d81:114026 2010
| 0.311439
| 2,005
| 1,022
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,830
|
the response of a 2d electron system to a dc measurement electric field has been investigated in the case when the system is driven out of the equilibrium by the magnetic ultra - high frequency field that leads to combined transitions involving the spin - orbit interaction .
it has been shown that the method of non - equilibrium statistical operator in conjunction ith the method of canonical transformations allows one to build a theory of linear response of a non - equilibrium 2d electron gas to a weak `` measurement '' dc electric field .
the proposed theory predicts that such perturbation of the electron system with high ( @xmath0 @xmath1/vs ) mobility leads to a new type of 2d electron gas conductivity oscillations controlled by the ratio of the radiation frequency to the cyclotron frequency .
|
in 2d electron systems with high ( @xmath0 @xmath1/vs ) electron mobility , the magnetoresistance exhibits strong oscillations in `` pre - shubnikov '' range of magnetic fields under microwave irradiation @xcite .
these oscillations are caused by electron transitions between landau levels due to the electric component of the microwave radiation .
together with the oscillations of the diagonal components of the conductivity tensor , `` beats '' have been found experimentally @xcite in the interval of more weak magnetic fields .
such beats are usually related with the manifestations of the interaction between kinetic and spin degrees of freedom of the conductivity electrons .
such interaction is the spin - orbit interaction ( soi ) that is known to be the origin of numerous effects in transport phenomena observed in such systems @xcite , etc .
soi also leads to the possibility of electron transitions between landau levels in the magnetic field at the combined resonance frequencies @xcite , thus transitions being possible both in antinodes of electric and magnetic fields @xcite .
finally , operation of a spin transistor ( schemes of which have been considered in @xcite ) is based upon spin degrees of freedom .
all of the above has determined elevated interest to investigations of the soi in 2d semiconductor structures . for the purpose of studying the soi
, it appears interesting to investigate a model in which the role of the soi should manifest itself the strongest . since the soi depends upon both translational and spin degrees of freedom , then it is a channel over which energy ( both electric and magnetic ) can be absorbed from the ultra - high frequency field , thus causing transitions between landau levels . because of that , it is interesting to investigate the response of a non - equilibrium electron system to a dc weak ( `` measurement '' ) electric field for the case when the initial non - equilibrium state is created with a high - frequency ac magnetic field that leads to combined transitions .
the question is how this perturbation affects transport coefficients , in particular , the conductivity tensor .
the discussed model includes the contributions form landau quantization and ( in the long - wavelength limit ) from the microwave radiation .
we consider impurity centers for the role of scatterers , treating the scattering process perturbatively .
the hamiltonian of the system under consideration consists of the kinetic energy @xmath2 , zeeman energy @xmath3 in the magnetic field @xmath4 , the spin - orbit interaction @xmath5 , interactions of electrons with ac magnetic and dc electric fields and with impurities , and the hamiltonian of the impurities themselves : @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 and @xmath10 are operators of the components of the spin and kinetic momentum of the @xmath11th electron , where @xmath12 = -i\delta_{ij } m \hbar\omega_c\varepsilon_{\alpha\beta z}$ ] , @xmath13 is the cyclotron frequency , and @xmath14 is bohr magneton . in this paper , we limit our consideration to the case when ac and dc magnetic fields are parallel to each other : @xmath15 . in this case , the hamiltonian of the interaction of electrons with the ac magnetic field has the form : @xmath16 we assume the specific form of the soi term , namely , rashba interaction , which is non - zero even in the linear order in momentum : @xmath17 @xmath18 here @xmath19 is the constant characterizing the soi , @xmath20 is the fully - antisymmetric levi chivita tensor .
the spin - orbit interaction leads to correlation of spatial and spin motion of electrons , thus , the translational and spin - related subsystems are not well - defined . since the soi is in some sense small ,
then one can perform a momentum - dependent canonical transformation that decouples kinetic and spin degrees of freedom .
all other terms in the hamiltonian , describing the interaction of electrons with the lattice and external fields also undergo the transformation . in this case
, the effective interaction of electrons in the system with external fields appears , which leads to resonant absorption of the field energy not only at the frequency of the paramagnetic resonance @xmath21 or cyclotron resonance @xmath22 , but also at their linear combinations .
the gauge - invariant theory describing such transitions has been developed in @xcite .
assuming the soi to be small , we perform the canonical transformation of the hamiltonian . up to the terms linear in @xmath23
, we have : @xmath24.\ ] ] the operator of the canonical transformation @xmath25 has to be determined from the requirement that , after the transformation , the @xmath26 and @xmath27 subsystems become independent .
this requirement , as one can easily see , is satisfied if one puts @xmath28 one can write the transformed hamiltonian in the following form : @xmath29,\ ] ] @xmath30 the effective interaction of the electrons and the ac magnetic field ( responsible for combined transitions ) can be found using the explicit expression for the operator @xmath23 : @xmath31 = \frac{i\alpha\omega_{1s}}{2(\omega_c - \omega_s ) } ( t^{+- } - t^{-+})\cos \omega t,\ ] ] @xmath32 where @xmath33 , @xmath34 is the intensity of the linearly polarized magnetic field , oscillating with the frequency @xmath35 according to the cosine law .
it follows from eq .
( [ 10 ] ) that the effective interaction @xmath36 leads to combined transitions at frequency @xmath37 , while the interaction of the spin degrees of freedom of the conductivity electrons with the ac magnetic field @xmath38 leads to resonant transitions at the frequency @xmath21 . since , for our further calculations , the response of the non - equilibrium system to the measurement electric field is interesting , in which the contribution from the translational degrees of freedom dominates , we will restrict our consideration to the effective interaction solely . during the calculation of the non - equilibrium response of the electron system to the measurement electric field
, there are technical difficulties cased by the dependence of the effective interaction @xmath36 upon time .
one can avoid them by transferring the time dependence to the impurity subsystem .
this can be done by means of a new canonical transformation .
the explicit form of the canonical transformation @xmath39 is determined from the requirement that it excludes @xmath36 from the effective hamiltonian of a system without impurities : @xmath40 the operator @xmath39 is expressed in the following form : @xmath41 the operator @xmath42 is searched for in the form : @xmath43 where one has to determine the parameters @xmath44 . in the linear approximation in the constant of the spin - orbit interaction ,
we have : @xmath45 as a result of the canonical transformation @xmath39 , renormalization of the electron - impurity interaction happens . in the case of elastic scattering , for obtaining the renormalized hamiltonian of the electron - impurity interaction ,
it is sufficient to calculate @xmath46 . in the linear approximation in the constant of the spin - orbit interaction @xmath19
, we obtain : @xmath47 using the explicit form of @xmath44 , we have : @xmath48 the speed of the electron momentum change is : @xmath49 where @xmath50 as one can see from ( [ ei ] ) , the renormalized electron - impurity interaction hamiltonian acquired time dependence . in
such canonically transformed system , impurities act as a coherent oscillating field that leads to resonant transitions .
we assume that the initial non - equilibrium state of the system under consideration is created by the ultra - high frequency magnetic field and can be described with the distribution @xmath51 . if some additional perturbation acts upon the system , then a new non - equilibrium state is formed in the system , that requires an extended set of basis operators for its description .
the new non - equilibrium distribution is described with the operator @xmath52 .
the task is to find the response of a non - equilibrium system to a weak measurement field .
using the technique of calculation the non - equilibrium statistical operator @xcite , we have for the momentum relaxation rate : @xmath53 @xmath54 \rho_q^ { 1-\lambda}.\ ] ] here @xmath55 is the common temperature of the kinetic and spin subsystem , that can be introduced when one neglects the `` heating '' effects , @xmath56 is the quasiequilibrium statistical operator .
now we expand the formula ( [ t1 ] ) using the explicit expression for the renormalized electron - impurity interaction @xmath57 . inserting the explicit expression for the electron - impurity interaction and averaging over the system of scatterers ,
we obtain : @xmath58 \rho_q^{1-\lambda } \}\end{gathered}\ ] ] here @xmath59 is the impurity concentration . rewriting this expression using secondary quantization and averaging the fermi operators using wick s theorem , we have : @xmath60 where @xmath61 is the fermi dirac distribution . @xmath62 and @xmath63 are the electron states in the dc magnetic field , they are characterized by the landau level number @xmath64 , @xmath65 projection of the wave wector @xmath66 , and @xmath67 projection of the spin @xmath68
. then we should integrate over @xmath69 , @xmath70 and @xmath71 , and take the limit @xmath72 , @xmath73 ( because we are interested in the zero - frequncy response ) .
for the correction to the momentum relaxation rate caused by the microwave radiation , we obtain : @xmath74 in the @xmath75 limit , we obtain : @xmath76 the equation ( [ t7 ] ) contains a singularity in its right hand side , which is removed , as usual , due to broadening of the landau levels by scattering electrons on impurities : @xmath77 the landau level width @xmath78 can be expressed via the electron mobility @xmath63 in zero magnetic field : @xmath79 integrating over the energy for the case @xmath80 , we have : @xmath81 calculating the matrix element in ( [ t7 ] ) on the wave functions @xmath82 we obtain : @xmath83 here @xmath84 is the cyclotron orbit center coordinate , @xmath85 is the magnetic length , @xmath86 denotes hermite polynomials , and @xmath87 is the eigenfunction of the @xmath67 spin projection . finally , integrating over @xmath88
, we have : @xmath89 thus , for the case of point scatterers , where @xmath90 does not depend on @xmath91 , the radiation - induced correction to the inverse relaxation time is : @xmath92
using the expression for the momentum relaxation rate , one can also write the formula for the diagonal components of the conductivity tensor @xmath93 . numerical calculations have been carried out with the following parameters : @xmath94 ( @xmath95 is the free electron mass ) , the fermi energy is @xmath96 mev , the mobility of the 2d electrons varies as @xmath97 @xmath1/vs , the electron density @xmath98 @xmath99 .
the microwave radiation frequency is @xmath100 ghz , the temperature is @xmath101 k. the magnetic field varied as 0.02 0.3 t. the dependence of the 2d electron gas photoconductivity on the @xmath102 ration is presented in fig . 1
. .,width=377 ] one can see that the dependence of electron mobility upon the magnetic field has the oscillating character .
the response of a non - equilibrium electron system to the dc electric measurement field has been studied for the case when the initial non - equilibrium state of the system is created by an ultra - high frequency magnetic field that leads to combined transitions . within the proposed theory ,
it has been shown that such perturbation of the electron system essentially influences the transport coefficients and leads to the oscillations of the diagonal components of the conductivity tensor .
the discussed effect is analogous to the phenomenon observed in gaas / algaas heterostructures with ultra - high electron mobility @xcite .
however , unlike that phenomenon , the manifestation of the oscillatory pattern is dictated by the spin - orbit interaction existing in the crystals under consideration .
|
2d electron systems with high electron mobility magnetoresistance exhibits strong oscillations in pre - shubnikov range magnetic fields under microwave irradiation oscillations caused by electron transitions between landau levels due to electric component microwave radiation oscillations diagonal components conductivity tensor beats found in weak magnetic fields beats related with interaction between kinetic spin degrees freedom conductivity electrons interaction spin - orbit interaction ( soi ) origin of effects in transport phenomena soi leads to electron transitions between landau levels in magnetic field at combined resonance frequencies transitions possible in antinodes electric magnetic fields operation of spin transistor based upon spin degrees freedom elevated interest to investigations soi in 2d semiconductor structures soi investigate model in role soi strongest soi depends upon translational spin degrees freedom channel energy absorbed from ultra - high frequency field causing transitions between landau levels interesting to investigate response of non - equilibrium electron system to weak electric field high - frequency magnetic field to combined transitions question how perturbation affects transport coefficients conductivity tensormodel includes contributions landau quantization microwave radiation consider impurity centers scatterers scattering process perturbatively hamiltonian system consists kinetic energy zeeman energy magnetic field spin - orbit interaction interactions electrons with ac magnetic dc electric fields impurities hamiltonian impurities : @xmath6 operators components spin kinetic momentum @xmath11th electron @xmath12 = -i\delta_ m \omega_c\varepsilon_\alpha\beta z$ cyclotron frequency is bohr magneton limit consideration to case ac dc magnetic fields parallel : @xmath15 hamiltonian interaction electrons with ac magnetic field form @xmath16 assume specific form soi term rashba interaction non - zero linear order momentum : @xmath17 constant characterizing soi @xmath20 - antisymmetric levi chivita tensor spin - orbit interaction leads to correlation spatial spin motion electrons translational spin - related subsystems not well - defined soi small momentum - dependent transformation decouples kinetic spin degrees freedom other terms in hamiltonian interaction electrons with external fields undergo transformationinteraction of electrons with external fields leads to resonant absorption field energy at paramagnetic resonance @xmath21 or cyclotron resonance @xmath22 linear combinations gauge - invariant theory developed in @xcite assuming soi small transformation of hamiltonian linear in @xmath23 @xmath24. operator transformation @xmath25 from requirement @xmath26 @xmath27 subsystems independent satisfied if @xmath28 transformed hamiltonian : @xmath29 @xmath30 effective interaction of electrons ac magnetic field combined transitions expression operator @xmath23 : @xmath31 = \frac\alpha\omega_{1s}}{2(_c -_s t\cos @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 intensity of linearly polarized magnetic field oscillating with frequency @xmath35 cosine law effective interaction @xmath36 leads to combined transitions at frequency @xmath37 interaction spin degrees freedom conductivity electrons with ac magnetic field @xmath38 to resonant transitions at frequency @xmath21calculations response non - equilibrium system to electric field interesting contribution translational degrees freedom dominates restrict consideration to effective interaction calculation non - equilibrium response electron system technical difficulties dependence interaction @xmath36 upon time transferring time dependence to impurity subsystem new canonical transformation transformation @xmath39 excludes @xmath36 from effective hamiltonian system without impurities @xmath40 operator @xmath39 expressed @xmath41 operator @xmath42 searched form @xmath43 determine parameters @xmath44 linear approximation constant spin - orbit interaction @xmath45 transformation @xmath39 renormalization electron - impurity interaction happens elastic scattering renormalized hamiltonian to calculate @xmath46 linear approximation constant spin - orbit interaction @xmath19 obtain : @xmath47 explicit form @xmath44 @xmath48 speed electron momentum change : @xmath49 @xmath50 renormalized electron - impurity interaction hamiltonian acquired time dependence canonically transformed system impurities act as coherent oscillating field to resonant transitions initial non - equilibrium state created by ultra - high frequency magnetic field described with distribution @xmath51 additional perturbation new non - equilibrium state formed requires extended basis operators new non - equilibrium distribution described operator @xmath52 task find response non - equilibrium system to weak measurement field non - equilibrium statistical operator @xcite momentum relaxation rate @xmath53 @xmath54 \rho_q^ 1-\lambda @xmath55 common temperature kinetic spin subsystem @xmath56 quasiequilibrium statistical operator expand formula explicit expression renormalized electron - impurity interaction @xmath57 inserting averaging @xmath58 \rho_q^{1-\lambda @xmath59 impurity concentration rewriting expression secondary quantization averaging fermi operators wick s theorem @xmath60 @xmath61 fermi dirac distribution @xmath62 @xmath63 electron states in dc magnetic field characterized by landau level number @xmath64 @xmath65 projection wave wector @xmath66 @xmath67 projection spin @xmath68 integrate over @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 limit @xmath72 @xmath73 zero - frequncy responsecorrection momentum relaxation rate microwave radiation obtain @xmath74 @xmath75 limit @xmath76 equation [ t7 ] ) contains singularity right side removed broadening landau levels scattering electrons impurities @xmath77 landau level width @xmath78 expressed electron mobility @xmath63 zero magnetic field @xmath79 integrating energy @xmath80 @xmath81 matrix element t7 ] wave functions @xmath83 @xmath84 cyclotron orbit center coordinate magnetic length hermite polynomials eigenfunction @xmath67 spin projection integrating @xmath88 @xmath89 point scatterers @xmath90 depend radiation - induced correction inverse relaxation time @xmath92 expression momentum relaxation rate formula diagonal components conductivity tensor @xmath93 numerical calculations parameters @xmath94 free electron mass fermi energy @xmath96 mev mobility 2d electrons varies electron density microwave radiation frequency ghz temperature @xmath101 k. magnetic field varied 0.02 0.3 t. dependence 2d electron gas photoconductivity @xmath102 ration fig . 1 =377 dependence electron mobility upon magnetic field has oscillating character response of non - equilibrium electron system to electric measurement field studied created by ultra - high frequency magnetic field transitions proposed theory perturbation electron system influences transport coefficients leads to oscillations of diagonal components conductivity tensor effect analogous to in gaas / algaas heterostructures with ultra - high electron mobility oscillatory pattern dictated by spin - orbit interaction in crystals
| 0.432107
| 2,686
| 1,369
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,834
|
extending the work of godsil and others , we investigate the notion of the inverse of a graph ( specifically , of bipartite graphs with a unique perfect matching ) .
we provide a concise necessary and sufficient condition for the invertibility of such graphs and generalize the notion of invertibility to multigraphs .
we examine the question of whether there exists a `` litmus subgraph '' whose bipartiteness determines invertibility . as an application of our invertibility criteria , we quickly describe all invertible unicyclic graphs .
finally , we describe a general combinatorial procedure for iteratively constructing invertible graphs , giving rise to large new families of such graphs .
[ section ] [ theo]proposition [ theo]lemma [ theo]corollary [ theo]definition [ theo]remark [ theo]example
|
given the plethora of composition operations on graphs ( cartesian sum , tensor product , etc . )
, one is naturally led to the question of whether or not there is a sensible notion of the _ inverse _ of a graph .
there is no shortage of possible definitions : a first attempt is to define two graphs to be inverses if they possess inverse adjacency matrices .
this turns out to be overly restrictive , as under this definition only the graphs @xmath0 are invertible , with themselves as their own inverses ( @xcite ) .
a second attempt , motivated by the observation that the eigenvalues of the sum and product of two graphs are the pairwise sums and products of the eigenvalues of the original graphs , is to call a graph @xmath1 invertible if there exists another graph @xmath2 such that for each eigenvalue @xmath3 of @xmath1 , @xmath4 is an eigenvalue of @xmath2 ( with the same multiplicity ) .
this definition too allows some unfortunate phenomena : if @xmath5 and @xmath6 are cospectral and non - isomorphic , then @xmath7 and @xmath8 ( if such graphs exist ) both satisfy the criterion for being inverses to @xmath5 , and we are left with multiple non - isomorphic inverses .
further , there would be no hope of attaining the obviously desirable property that @xmath9 be isomorphic to @xmath1 .
it therefore behooves us to strengthen the condition defining the inverse .
we begin by noting that since adjacency matrices are diagonalizable ( being real and symmetric ) , two such matrices are cospectral if and only if they are similar .
the reciprocal eigenvalue condition described above is thus tantamount to asserting that the inverse @xmath10 of the adjacency matrix to @xmath1 is similar to the adjacency matrix of @xmath2 .
a strengthening of the definition comes from a result of godsil ( @xcite ) that under certain conditions on @xmath1 ( described below ) , the inverse adjacency matrix @xmath10 is in fact _
signable _ to a non - negative symmetric integral matrix with zeros on the diagonal , i.e. , to the adjacency matrix of a graph . here
we say @xmath11 is signable to @xmath12 if @xmath11 can be conjugated to @xmath12 by a diagonal matrix whose diagonal entries are all @xmath13 ( i.e. , by a _ signing matrix _ ) .
we therefore adopt the following definition : given a graph @xmath1 , we say that a graph @xmath14 is an _
inverse _ of @xmath1 if they possess adjacency matrices @xmath15 and @xmath16 such that @xmath16 is signable to @xmath17 .
we then say that @xmath1 is _ invertible _ , and say that @xmath1 is _ simply invertible _ if there exists a simple graph @xmath14 which is an inverse of @xmath1 .
( in particular , we emphasize that a simple graph can be invertible but not simply invertible . )
clearly this stronger condition defining invertibility implies the earlier reciprocal eigenvalue property , and it is thus easy to find non - invertible graphs
namely , any graph with an eigenvalue of 0 , e.g. , bipartite graphs on an odd number of vertices .
in fact , this is a convenient place to note that for an invertible graph @xmath1 with an inverse @xmath14 , we must have @xmath18 , and so @xmath19 for any invertible graph .
this forces @xmath1 to admit a perfect matching ( or `` 1-factor '' ) , providing fairly compelling evidence that most graphs are not invertible . following godsil and the subsequent literature , we focus on graphs @xmath1 which are bipartite and have a _
unique _ perfect matching @xmath20 . the first significant invertibility result ( @xcite , theorem 2.2 )
gives that a simple graph @xmath1 ( bipartite with a unique perfect matching @xmath20 ) is invertible if the graph @xmath21 obtained by contracting each edge of @xmath20 is bipartite .
the aim of the current paper is to extend results of this form in a variety of different directions .
section 2 contains preliminaries on bipartite graphs with a unique perfect matching , focusing on inversion and extending previously well - known results for simple graphs to the context of multigraphs . in particular , we give a purely graph - theoretic construction of the inverse ( when it exists see theorem [ gottabe ] ) , which we dub the _ parity closure _ of the graph .
we emphasize a graphical point of view ( as opposed to a poset - theoretical or linear - algebraic one ) , enough so that it is frequently possible to bypass any matrix - inversion calculations and `` eyeball '' both the invertibility and inverse of a given graph .
further , we prove that the construction satisfies the desired properties of an inverse from the introduction ( i.e. , that @xmath22 see theorem [ g++ ] ) . in section 3
, we turn our attention to determining conditions for the inverse to exist .
first , we extend a variety of known results on invertibility to the context of multigraphs , among them the result of godsil mentioned above and a related result of @xcite that a necessary condition for invertibility is the bipartiteness of a certain subgraph @xmath23 of @xmath21 .
continuing , we note that the main result of @xcite gives much more , reducing the question of the invertibility of @xmath1 to the invertibility of a collection of subgraphs ( the `` undirected intervals '' ) of @xmath1 .
their culminating necessary and sufficient condition for invertibility admits some curiosities , however . if @xmath1 is either : a. a simply invertible undirected interval graph with bipartite hasse diagram ( figure [ tkfigs ] , left ) ; or b. a non - invertible interval graph with bipartite hasse diagram all of whose proper sub - undirected intervals are invertible ( figure [ tkfigs ] , right ) , [ allunis ] every @xmath24 which is connected and unicyclic as an undirected graph can be constructed in this manner .
let @xmath24 be such a graph , with @xmath20 vertices and a cycle of length @xmath25 .
as above , without loss of generality we assume that the vertices contained in the unique cycle are labelled consecutively , say @xmath26 through @xmath27 . for each vertex @xmath28 in @xmath24
, let @xmath29 $ ] be the set of vertices edge - connected to @xmath28 and for @xmath30 $ ] , let @xmath31 correspond to those edges coming from other vertices in the cycle .
then by connectedness and unicyclicity , the sets @xmath32 and @xmath33 form partitions as in the proposition , and we can follow the construction process in the proof of proposition [ uconst2 ] with adjacency sets @xmath34 and @xmath35 to reconstruct @xmath24 . if @xmath25 is even , the resulting unicyclic digraph is bipartite , and thus invertible .
the requirement that @xmath36 for all @xmath37 forces @xmath38 and is equivalent to saying the undirected cycle subgraph @xmath39 induced by vertices @xmath40 must contain only one source and one sink vertex ( i.e. , @xmath41 in the language of theorem [ unicycleinvert ] ) , and that these two vertices must be adjacent .
thus , the result follows directly from theorem [ unicycleinvert ] .
99 m. aigner .
_ combinatorial theory_. 1979 , springer - verlag , new york . s. akbari and s. kirkland .
on unimodular graphs . _ linear algebra and its applications _ , * 421 * ( 2001 ) pp . 3 - 15 .
robert donaghey and louis w. shapiro .
motzkin numbers .
_ journal of combinatorial theory , series a. _ * 23 * , 201 - 301 .
inverses of trees .
_ combinatorica _ * 5 * ( 1 ) , pp .
f. harary and h. minc .
which nonnegative matrices are self - inverse ? _ mathematics magazine _ , vol .
2 ( mar . , 1976 ) , pp . 91 - 92 .
mathematical association of america .
the on - line encyclopedia of integer sequences , published electronically at http://oeis.org , 2011 . sequence a001006 .
david speyer .
partitions into 0,1 , and 2 with a partial sum condition , http://mathoverflow.net/questions/64802 ( version : 2011 - 05 - 12 ) .
r. simion and d. cao .
solution to a problem of c.d .
godsil regarding bipartite graphs with unique perfect matching .
_ combinatorica _ * 9 * ( 1 ) ( 1989 ) pp .
r. tifenbach and s. kirkland .
directed intervals and the dual of a graph .
_ linear algebra and its applications _ , * 431 * ( 2009 ) pp .
792 - 807 .
|
composition operations on graphs ( cartesian sum tensor product to question sensible notion inverse _ of graph possible definitions first attempt to define two graphs inverses if inverse adjacency matrices restrictive only graphs @xmath0 invertible inverses second attempt eigenvalues of sum product of two graphs are pairwise sums products original graphs call graph @xmath1 invertible if another graph @xmath2 for each eigenvalue @xmath3 of @xmath1 @xmath4 is eigenvalue of @xmath2 same multiplicity definition allows unfortunate phenomena if @xmath5 and @xmath6 cospectral non - isomorphic @xmath7 and @xmath8 satisfy criterion for inverses to @xmath5 with multiple non - isomorphic inverses no hope of attaining @xmath9 isomorphic to @xmath1 strengthen condition defining inverse adjacency matrices are diagonalizable real symmetric two matrices cospectral if similar reciprocal eigenvalue condition tantamount to asserting inverse @xmath10 of matrix to @xmath1 similar to @xmath2 strengthening definition godsil @xcite ) under conditions on @xmath1 inverse adjacency matrix @xmath10 signable to non - negative symmetric integral matrix with zeros on diagonal adjacency matrix graph @xmath11 signable to @xmath12 if conjugated to @xmath12 by diagonal matrix entries @xmath13 adopt definition : graph @xmath1 graph @xmath14 inverse of @xmath1 if adjacency matrices @xmath15 and @xmath16 @xmath16 signable to @xmath17 @xmath1 invertible simply invertible if simple graph @xmath14 inverse of @xmath1 simple graph invertible not simply invertible stronger condition defining invertibility implies reciprocal eigenvalue property easy to find non - invertible graphs with eigenvalue of 0 bipartite graphs on odd number vertices for invertible graph @xmath1 with inverse @xmath14 must have @xmath18 @xmath19 for invertible graph forces @xmath1 to admit perfect matching evidence most graphs not invertible following godsil focus on graphs @xmath1 bipartite unique perfect matching @xmath20 first invertibility result ( @xcite theorem 2.2 ) simple graph @xmath1 ( bipartite unique perfect matching @xmath20 ) invertible if graph @xmath21 contracting edge @xmath20 bipartite aim current paper to extend results different directions section 2 preliminaries on bipartite graphs unique perfect matching focusing on inversion extending results to multigraphs graph - theoretic construction of inverse theorem _ parity closure _ of graph emphasize graphical point of view bypass matrix - inversion calculations eyeball invertibility inverse of graph prove construction satisfies desired properties of inverse @xmath22 see theorem [ g++ ) section 3 to determining conditions for inverse exist extend results on invertibility to multigraphs result of godsil related result @xcite necessary condition for invertibility bipartiteness of subgraph @xmath23 of @xmath21 main result of @xcite question invertibility of @xmath1 to invertibility of collection of subgraphs of @xmath1 culminating necessary sufficient condition for invertibility admits curiosities if @xmath1 is either : a.invertible undirected interval graph bipartite hasse diagram figure left non - invertible interval graph bipartite hasse diagram sub - undirected intervals invertible figure right @xmath24 connected unicyclic undirected graph constructed @xmath24 graph @xmath20 vertices cycle length @xmath25 vertices cycle labelled consecutively @xmath26 through @xmath27 each vertex @xmath28 @xmath24 @xmath29 edge - connected to @xmath28 @xmath30 @xmath31 correspond edges other vertices connectedness unicyclicity sets @xmath32 @xmath33 form partitions follow construction process proof proposition adjacency sets @xmath34 @xmath35 reconstruct @xmath24 if @xmath25 even resulting unicyclic digraph bipartite invertible @xmath36 @xmath37 forces @xmath38 undirected cycle subgraph @xmath39 induced vertices @xmath40 contain one source one sink vertex @xmath41 two vertices adjacent result follows from theorem [ unicycleinvert ] m. aigner combinatorial theory 1979 springer - verlag new york s. akbari s. kirkland unimodular graphslinear algebra applications 421 2001 ) pp 3 - 15 robert donaghey shapiro motzkin numbers journal combinatorial theory series 23 201 - 301 inverses trees combinatorica 5 1 ) f. harary h. minc nonnegative matrices self - inverse mathematics magazine 2 1976 91 - 92 mathematical association america encyclopedia integer sequences 2011 sequence a001006 david speyer partitions 0,1 2 partial sum condition.net/questions/64802 2011 - 05 - 12 r. simion d. cao solution problem godsil bipartite graphs perfect matching combinatorica 9 1 1989 ) tifenbach s kirkland directed intervals dual graph linear algebra 431 2009 ) 792 - 807
| 0.315033
| 2,047
| 1,089
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,844
|
the solar seismic waves excited by solar flares ( `` sunquakes '' ) are observed as circular expanding waves on the sun s surface .
the first sunquake was observed for a flare of july 9 , 1996 , from the solar and heliospheric observatory ( soho ) space mission .
however , when the new solar cycle started in 1997 , the observations of solar flares from soho did not show the seismic waves , similar to the 1996 event , even for large x - class flares during the solar maximum in 2000 - 2002 .
the first evidence of the seismic flare signal in this solar cycle was obtained for the 2003 `` halloween '' events , through acoustic `` egression power '' by donea and lindsey . after these several other strong sunquakes have been observed .
here , i present a detailed analysis of the basic properties of the helioseismic waves generated by three solar flares in 2003 - 2005 . for two of these flares ,
x17 flare of october 28 , 2003 , and x1.2 flare of january 15 , 2005 , the helioseismology observations are compared with simultaneous observations of flare x - ray fluxes measured from the rhessi satellite .
these observations show a close association between the flare seismic waves and the hard x - ray source , indicating that high - energy electrons accelerated during the flare impulsive phase produced strong compression waves in the photosphere , causing the sunquake .
the results also reveal new physical properties such as strong anisotropy of the seismic waves , the amplitude of which varies significantly with the direction of propagation .
the waves travel through surrounding sunspot regions to large distances , up to 120 mm , without significant decay .
these observations open new perspectives for helioseismic diagnostics of flaring active regions on the sun and for understanding the mechanisms of the energy release and transport in solar flares .
|
it was suggested long ago @xcite that solar flares , giant explosions on the sun , may cause acoustic waves traveling through the sun s interior , similar to the seismic waves on the earth . because the sound speed increases with depth the waves are reflected in the deep layers of the sun and appear back on the surface , forming expanding rings of the surface displacement .
theoretical modeling @xcite predicted that the speed of the expanding seismic waves increases with distance because the distant waves propagate into the deeper interior where the sound speed is higher .
first observations of the seismic waves caused by the x2.6 flare of july 9 , 1996 @xcite , proved these predictions .
these observations also showed that the source of the seismic response was a strong shock - like compression wave propagating downwards in the photosphere .
this wave was observed immediately after the hard x - ray impulse which produced by high - energy electrons hitting the low atmosphere .
this led to a suggestion that the seismic response can be explained in terms of so - called `` thick - target '' models . in these models ,
a beam of high - energy is related to heating of the solar chromosphere , resulting in evaporation of the upper chromosphere and a strong compression of the lower chromosphere ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
this high - pressure compression produces a downward propagating shock wave @xcite that hits the solar surface and causes sunquakes .
this shock observed in soho / mdi dopplergrams as a localized large - amplitude velocity impulse of about 1 km / s or stronger represents the initial hydrodynamic impact resulting in the seismic response .
in addition , @xcite found that the seismic wave was anisotropic , with a significant quadrupole component .
the following observations of solar flares made by the michelson doppler imager ( mdi ) instrument on the nasa - esa mission soho did not show noticeable sunquake signals even for strong x - class flares .
this search was carried out by calculating an `` egression '' power for high - frequency acoustic waves during the flares @xcite .
it became clear that sunquakes are a rather rare phenomenon on the sun , which occurs only under some special conditions .
surprisingly , seven years later several flares did show strong `` egression '' signals indicating new potential sunquakes @xcite ( for a list see http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~adonea ) .
it is interesting to note that the flare of july 9 , 1996 , was the last strong of the previous solar activity cycle , and the new strong sunquake events are observed in the declining phase of the current activity cycle after the maximum of 2000 - 2001 .
it appears that during the rising phase of the solar cycle and during its peak the solar flares are rather a `` superficial '' coronal phenomenon not affecting much the solar surface and interior .
this could happen if the topology of magnetic field of solar active regions which produce flares changes in such a way that the magnetic energy is released at lower altitudes in the declining phase of the solar cycle than in the rising and maximum phase . here ,
i present analysis of new observations of the seismic response to solar flares from the soho and rhessi space observatories , which show that the sunquakes were indeed caused by the hydrodynamic impacts of high - energy electrons accelerated in solar flares confirming the initial result of @xcite , and determine basic properties of the flare - generated seismic waves by investigating their time - distance characteristics .
the mdi instrument on soho measures motions of the solar surface through the doppler shift of a photospheric absorption line ni i 6768 a. the measurements provide images of the line - of - sight velocity of the sun s surface every minute with the spatial resolution 2 arcsec per pixel .
examples of the mdi dopplergrams obtained during the sunquake events are shown in the two right columns in figure 1 ( grey semitransparent images overlaying color images of sunspots ) .
there are several types of motions on the solar surface , which contribute to the mdi signal .
the largest contributions of about 500 m / s come from the solar convection and stochastic 5-min oscillations excited by convection ( they form the noisy granular - like pattern in fig.1 ) . the amplitude of the flare - generated seismic waves ( ring - like features identified in the middle column of fig.1 ) rarely exceeds 100 m / s .
thus , because of the strong stochastic motions in the background , these waves are difficult to detect . however , these waves form an almost circular - shape expanding ring , velocity of which is determined by the sound speed inside the sun and can be calculated from solar models .
this property is used to extract the seismic response signal from the noisy data . because the waves are close to circular the dopplergrams
can be averaged over a range of the azimuthal angle around central points of the initial flare impact .
these centers are identified during the flare impulsive phase as strong localized rapidly varying velocity perturbations of about 1 km / s ( light and dark features in left column of fig.1 ) .
the azimuthally averaged dopplergrams are plotted as time - distance diagrams ( right columns of fig.1 ; the averaging angular range in the polar coordinates in indicated at the top ) , in which the seismic wave forms a continuous ridge corresponding the time - distance relation for acoustic propagating through the solar interior .
the slope of this ridge is decreasing with distance , meaning that the waves accelerate .
this happens because the seismic waves observed at longer distances travel through the deeper interior of the sun where the sound speed is higher because of higher plasma temperature .
typically , the ring speed changes from 10 km / s to 100 km / s . in the `` egression power ''
method @xcite the wave signal is integrated along the time - distance ridge , thus giving the total average of the seismic signal power for specific central points .
the egression power can be calculated for the whole dopplergram revealing places of potential sunquakes .
this method is useful as a search tool , but it does not provide characteristics of the seismic waves . because of the high solar noise , the seismic waves are not easily seen on individual dopplergrams .
they are much easier recognized in dopplergram movies as expanding circular wave fronts .
the typical oscillation frequency of the flare waves is higher than the mean frequency of the background fluctuations ( 4 - 5 mhz vs. 3 mhz ) .
therefore , frequency filtering centered at 5 or 6 mhz helps to increase the signal - to - noise ratio . in most cases , a frequency filter centered at 6 mhz with the width of 2 mhz
is used , and , in addition , the difference filter for consecutive images is applied .
localized doppler perturbations during the flare impulsive phase , similar to shown in the fig.1 ( left panels ) and presumably associated with precipitation of high - energy particles are commonly observed .
therefore , that one might expect that seismic waves are excited in most flares that affect the photosphere .
however , in most cases the flare hydrodynamic impact in the photosphere and , thus , the seismic response appear to be weak .
the main purpose of this paper is to investigate properties of strong seismic waves when their wave fronts can be observed explicitly in dopplergrams and time - distance diagrams . a list of 6 flares with such strong seismic waves , observed from soho / mdi between 1996 and 2005 in given in table 1 .
figure 1 presents results for three strongest events so far , observed on 10/28/2003 , 07/16/2004 and 01/15/2005 .
the first flare of october 28 , 2003 , was one of the strongest ever observed , having the soft x - ray class x17 .
it is interesting that the two other flares had much weaker soft x - ray class , but produced higher amplitude seismic waves than this one .
the analysis of these observations reveals new interesting features of the seismic response : 1 ) flares can produce multiple sunquakes almost simultaneously originating from separate positions ( as also found by @xcite for the 10/28/2003 flare ) ; 2 ) the seismic waves are highly anisotropic , their amplitude can vary significantly with angle ; 3 ) the strongest amplitude is commonly observed in the same direction as the direction of motion of flare ribbons ; 4 ) the wave fronts in most cases have elliptical shape , originating from elongated in one direction initial impulse ; 5 ) the centers of the expanding waves coincide very well with the places of hydrodynamic impacts in mdi dopplergrams ( confirming the initial observation of * ? ? ?
* ) , however , not all impact sources produce strong seismic waves ; 6 ) the seismic waves are usually first observed 15 - 20 min after the initial impact , and reach the highest amplitude 20 - 30 min after the flare ; 7 ) the seismic waves can travel to large distances exceeding 120 mm , but , in some cases , decay more rapidly ; 8) the fronts of acoustic seismic waves propagate through sunspots without much distortion and significant decay , thus showing no evidence for conversion into other types of mhd waves ; 9 ) the time - distance diagrams for the waves propagating in sunspot regions show only small deviations of the order of 2 - 3 min from the wave travel times of the quiet sun ; these variations are consistent with the travel time measurements obtained by time - distance helioseismology using the cross - covariance function for random waves @xcite . for two of these flares , x17 of october 28 , 2003 , and january 15 , 2005
, x - ray data are available for analysis .
the rhessi image reconstruction software was used to obtain locations of the x - ray sources in these flares and compare with the mdi doppler measurements of the hydrodynamic impulses and seismic responses .
figure 2 shows a white - light image of the flaring active region ( noaa 10696 ) and the superimposed images of the doppler signal at the impulsive phase , 11:06 ut , ( blue and yellow spots show up and down photospheric motions with variations in the mdi signal stronger than 1 km / s ) , positions of three wave fronts at 11:37 ut , and also locations of the hard x - ray ( 50 - 100 kev ) sources ( yellow circles ) at 11:06 ut , and 2.2 mev gamma - ray sources ( green circles ) found by @xcite ( averaged for the whole flare duration ) .
evidently , the x - ray and gamma - ray source are very close to the positions of the seismic sources , but there was no gamma - ray emission near source 3 .
also , the gamma emission was not detected for other seismic events .
this leads to the conclusion that the origin of the seismic response is the hydrodynamic impact ( shock ) , which is observed in the doppler signals at 11:06 ut and shows the best correspondence to the central positions of the wave fronts , contrary to the suggestion of @xcite that photospheric heating by high - energy protons is likely to be a major factor .
this was verified by calculating the time - distance diagrams for various central positions and various angular sectors .
when the central position of a time - distance diagram deviates from the seismic source position this deviation is immediately seen in the diagram as an off - set of the time - distance ridge .
this approach provides effective source positions for complicated and distributed doppler signals . the flare of january 15 , 2005 , of moderate x - ray class , x1.2 , but it produced the strongest seismic wave observed so far by soho ( fig.1 , bottom row ) .
its amplitude exceeded 100 m / s .
this wave had an elliptical shape with the major axis in the se - nw direction .
the elliptical shape corresponds very well to the linear shape of the seismic source extended in this case along the magnetic neutral line .
this is illustrated in figure 3 .
the left panel shows the grey - scale map the dopplergram difference at 0:40 ut , in which the long white feature near the center corresponds to strong downflows at the seismic source , and an image of the hard x - ray source ( color spot ) .
the right panel shows the corresponding mdi magnetogram and an image of the soft x - ray emission ( in gray ) and contour line of the hard x - ray source .
evidently , the region of the hydrodynamic impact was located just below the hard x - ray source , which was at a footpoint of the soft x - ray loop .
figure 4 illustrates this sequence of events for the january 15 , 2005 , flare , from top to bottom .
the high - energy electrons accelerated in the flare ( presumably , high in the corona ) produced hard x - ray impulse in the lower atmosphere and generated downward propagating shocks which hit the photosphere and generated the seismic waves .
this picture corresponds very well to the standard thick target model of solar flares @xcite and the models of the hydrodynamic response ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
the soft x - ray image indicates this flare was rather compact .
one may suggest that the seismic response can be particularly strong in the case of a compact solar flare , but this needs to be confirmed by further observations .
the new observations from soho and rhessi provide unique information about the interaction of the high - energy particles accelerated in solar flares with solar plasma and the dynamics of the solar atmosphere during solar flares .
these data also provide unique information about the interaction of acoustic mhd waves with sunspots , showing explicitly propagation of wave fronts through sunspot regions .
this opens opportunity for developing new methods of helioseismology analysis of flaring active regions , similar to the methods of earth - quake seismology .
|
suggested @xcite solar flares explosions sun cause acoustic waves sun s interior similar to seismic waves earth sound speed increases with waves reflected in deep layers sun appear on surface forming expanding rings theoretical modeling predicted speed expanding seismic waves increases with distance distant waves propagate deeper interior sound speed higher observations seismic waves x2.6 flare july 9 1996 proved predictions showed source seismic response strong shock - like compression wave propagating downwards photosphere wave observed after x - ray impulse high - energy electrons low atmosphere suggestion seismic response explained thick - target '' models high - energy related to heating solar chromosphere evaporation upper chromosphere strong compression lower chromosphere high pressure compression produces shock wave solar surface causes sunquakes shock observed as localized large - amplitude velocity impulse about 1 km / s or stronger represents initial hydrodynamic impact seismic response found seismic wave anisotropic significant quadrupole component observations solar flares michelson doppler nasa - esa mission soho show sunquake signals even strong x - class flaressearch egression power for high - frequency acoustic waves during flares @xcite sunquakes rare on sun under special conditions seven years later flares strong egression signals potential sunquakes @xcite http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~adonea flare of july 9 1996 last strong previous solar activity cycle new strong sunquake events in declining phase activity cycle after maximum 2000 - 2001 during rising phase solar cycle peak solar flares superficial coronal not affecting solar surface interior if topology magnetic field changes magnetic energy released at lower altitudes declining phase analysis new observations seismic response to solar flares from soho rhessi space observatories sunquakes caused by hydrodynamic impacts of high - energy electrons in solar flares confirming initial result @xcite properties flare - generated seismic waves time - distance characteristics mdi instrument on soho measures motions solar surface doppler shift photospheric absorption line measurements provide images line - of - sight velocity sun s surface every minute spatial resolution 2 arcsec per pixel mdi dopplergrams during sunquake events in figure 1several motions on solar surface contribute to mdi signal largest contributions 500 m / s from solar convection stochastic 5-min oscillations form noisy granular - like pattern in fig.1 amplitude flare - generated seismic waves ring - like features rarely exceeds 100 m / s strong stochastic motions waves difficult to detect waves form circular - expanding ring velocity determined by sound speed inside sun calculated from solar models property used seismic response signal from noisy data waves circular dopplergrams averaged over range azimuthal angle around central points initial flare impact centers identified as strong localized varying velocity perturbations about 1 km / s averaged dopplergrams plotted as time - distance diagrams seismic wave forms continuous ridge - solar slope ridge with distance waves accelerate waves travel through deeper interior sun sound speed higher higher plasma temperature ring speed changes from 10 km / s to 100 km / s in egression power '' method wave signal integrated along time - distance ridge total average seismic signal power for specific central pointsegression power calculated for dopplergram potential sunquakes method useful search tool provide characteristics seismic waves high solar noise seismic waves not seen on dopplergrams easier recognized in expanding circular wave fronts typical oscillation frequency flare waves higher than background fluctuations 4 - 5 mhz vs. 3 mhz frequency filtering at 5 or 6 mhz signal - to - noise ratio filter 6 mhz width 2 mhz used difference filter for consecutive images localized doppler perturbations during flare impulsive phase.1 associated with precipitation high - energy particles observed seismic waves excited in flares photosphere flare hydrodynamic impact seismic response weak purpose paper properties strong seismic waves observed in dopplergrams time - distance diagrams list of 6 flares with strong seismic waves soho between 1996 and 2005 table 1 figure 1 results for three strongest events 10/28/2003 07/16/2004 01/15/2005 first flare october 28 2003 strongest soft x - ray class x17 two other flares weaker soft x - ray class produced higher amplitude seismic wavesanalysis observations reveals features seismic response flares produce multiple sunquakes simultaneously from separate positions found by 10/28/2003 flare seismic waves anisotropic amplitude with angle strongest amplitude in same as flare ribbons wave fronts have elliptical shape from elongated initial impulse centers expanding waves coincide with hydrodynamic impacts in mdi dopplergrams not all impact sources produce strong seismic waves seismic waves first observed 15 - 20 min after impact highest amplitude 20 - 30 min after flare seismic waves travel large distances exceeding 120 mm decay rapidly fronts acoustic seismic waves propagate through sunspots without distortion decay no evidence for conversion into mhd waves time - distance diagrams for waves sunspot show small deviations 2 - 3 min from wave travel times quiet sun consistent with travel time measurements time - distance helioseismology - for two flares 15 2005 x - ray data available for analysis rhessi image reconstruction software used to locations x - ray sources with mdi doppler measurements hydrodynamic seismic responsesfigure 2 shows image flaring active region noaa 10696 doppler signal impulsive phase 11:06 ut blue yellow spots show photospheric motions variations mdi signal than 1 km / s three wave fronts 11:37 ut hard x - ray 50 - 100 kev sources yellow 11:06 2.2 mev gamma - ray sources green @xcite x - ray gamma - ray source close to seismic sources no gamma - ray emission near source 3 gamma emission not detected other seismic events origin seismic response hydrodynamic impact shock ) observed doppler signals 11:06 ut correspondence central positions wave fronts photospheric heating by high - energy protons major factor verified calculating time - distance diagrams central positions angular sectors position deviates from seismic source deviation seen off - set ridge approach provides effective source positions for complicated doppler signals flare january 15 2005 moderate x - ray class x1.2 produced strongest seismic wave observed by soho amplitude exceeded 100 m / s wave elliptical shape axis se - nw direction corresponds to linear shape seismic source along magnetic neutral line illustrated in figure 3left panel shows grey - scale map dopplergram difference at 0:40 ut long white feature strong downflows at seismic source image hard x - ray source right panel shows mdi magnetogram image soft x - ray emission contour line of hard x - ray source hydrodynamic impact below hard x - ray source footpoint of soft x - ray loop figure 4 illustrates sequence events january 15 2005 flare high - energy electrons in flare produced hard x - ray impulse generated shocks photosphere generated seismic waves picture corresponds to standard thick target model of solar flares models hydrodynamic response soft x - ray image indicates flare compact seismic response strong compact solar flare needs further observations new observations from soho rhessi provide information interaction high - energy particles with solar plasma dynamics solar atmosphere data provide unique information interaction acoustic mhd waves with sunspots propagation of wave fronts through sunspot regions opens opportunity for new methods helioseismology analysis of flaring active regions similar earth - quake seismology
| 0.444577
| 2,973
| 1,476
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,863
|
we discuss the known experimental data on the phase of the de haas -van alphen oscillations in graphite .
these data can be understood if one takes into account that four band - contact lines exist near the hkh edge of the brillouin zone of graphite .
|
at present , graphite and its electronic properties attract considerable attention due to the discovery of novel carbon - based materials such as fullerenes and nanotubes constructed from wrapped graphite sheets .
@xcite besides , thin films of graphite give promise of device applications .
@xcite the attention to graphite is also caused by specific features of its electron energy spectrum which result in interesting physical effects .
@xcite the electronic spectrum of graphite is described by the slonzewski - weiss - mcclure ( swm ) model , @xcite and values of the main parameters of this model were found sufficiently accurately from an analysis of various experimental data ; see , e.g. , the review of brandt _
et al_. @xcite and references therein .
the fermi surface of graphite consists of elongated pockets enclosing the edge hkh of its brillouin zone ( see figures below ) .
these pockets are formed by the two majority groups of electrons ( e ) and holes ( h ) which are located near the points k and h of the brillouin zone , respectively .
there is also at least one minority ( m ) low - concentration group of charge carriers in graphite , and this group seems to be located near the point h. however , it is necessary to emphasize that in spite of the considerable attention attracted to graphite an unresolved problem concerned with its spectrum still exists .
it is well known @xcite that in the edge hkh of the brillouin zone of graphite , two electron energy bands are degenerate , and in a small vicinity of the edge these bands split linearly in a deviation of the wave vector @xmath0 from the edge .
in other words , the edge is the band - contact line .
but , it was shown in our paper @xcite that if in the @xmath0-space a closed semiclassical orbit of a charge carrier surrounds a contact line of its band with some other band ( and lifting of the degeneracy is linear in @xmath0 ) , the wave function of this carrier after its turn over the orbit acquires the addition phase @xmath1 as compared to the case without the band - contact line .
this @xmath2 is the so - called berry phase , @xcite and it modifies the constant @xmath3 in the well - known semiclassical quantization rule @xcite for the energy @xmath4 of a charge carrier in the magnetic fields @xmath5 : @xmath6 where @xmath7 is the cross - sectional area of the closed orbit in the @xmath0 space ; @xmath8 is the component of @xmath0 perpendicular to the plane of this orbit ; @xmath9 is a large integer ( @xmath10 ) ; @xmath11 is the absolute value of the electron charge , and the constant @xmath3 is now given by the formula:@xcite @xmath12 when the magnetic field is applied along the hkh axis , orbits of electrons and holes in the brillouin zone of graphite surround this axis .
thus , one might expect to find @xmath13 for these orbits instead of the usual value @xmath14 ( the values @xmath13 and @xmath15 are equivalent ) .
a value of @xmath3 can be measured using various oscillation effects and in particular , with the de haas - van alphen effect .
@xcite for example , the first harmonic of the de haas - van alphen oscillations of the magnetic susceptibility has the form , @xcite @xmath16 where @xmath17 , @xmath18 is some extremal cross section of the fermi surface of a metal in @xmath8 , a positive @xmath19 is the amplitude of this first harmonic , and @xmath20 is its phase which is given by @xmath21 with @xmath22 for a minimum and maximum cross - section @xmath18 , respectively , and @xmath23 in the case of a two - dimensional fermi surface . @xcite
it follows from eq .
( [ 4 ] ) that one has to obtain @xmath24 for the maximum cross - sections of the electron and hole majorities in graphite .
however , the phases @xmath25 , @xmath26 measured long ago @xcite agree with the usual value @xmath27 ; see table i. recently a new method of determining the phase @xmath20 of the de haas - van alphen oscillations was elaborated , @xcite and the authors of that paper found @xmath13 for the cross section of the hole majority in graphite .
however , in this determination they assumed the fermi surface of the holes to be two - dimensional ( @xmath28 ) ; see table i. besides this , they found @xmath27 for the maximum cross section of the electron majority , assuming the three - dimensional fermi surface for this majority ( @xmath29 ) .
although the obtained value @xmath13 for the holes agrees with the above prediction , the results of ref .
give rise to the following new problems : first , since the band - contact line in graphite penetrates both the electron and hole extremal cross sections , these cross sections must have the same @xmath3 .
second , using the values of the parameters of swm model , @xcite one might expect that in graphite the electrons and holes of the extremal cross sections are both three - dimensional . in this paper
we show that in graphite , apart from the band - contact line coinciding with the edge hkh , _ three additional _ band - contact lines exist near this edge .
the existence of these lines leads to the usual value @xmath27 for the maximum cross sections of the electron and hole majority groups in graphite .
in other words , we resolve the above - mention contradiction between the theoretical value of @xmath3 and the data of refs . .
we also discuss the data of ref . .
[ cols="<,^,>,>,^,^,>,>,^,^ , < " , ]
when the magnetic field @xmath5 is directed along the @xmath30 axis , the maximum electron cross section in @xmath31 is located at @xmath32 , while the maximum cross section of the hole majority is between the points k and @xmath33 , viz .
, at @xmath34 where @xmath35 is the fermi energy in graphite , see fig . 2 .
thus , both these cross sections are penetrated by the four band - contact lines .
however , an _ even _ number of the band - contact lines do not change @xcite the usual value @xmath14 .
thus , we find @xmath14 for the maximum cross sections of the majority groups , which agrees with the experimental results of refs . .
we now discuss briefly the value of @xmath3 for the minority group . for the parameters presented in table
ii , the hole minority is located near the point h and it results from the band @xmath36 . at this point
the minority and the hole majority produced by the band @xmath37 have equal cross sections when the magnetic field is along the hkh axis . since no contact lines of the bands @xmath36 and @xmath37 penetrate this common cross section
, one might expect to find the usual value @xmath14 in this case .
however , the semiclassical approximation which is used in deriving eqs .
( [ 1 ] ) and ( [ 2 ] ) fails for the hole orbits corresponding to this cross section since for this approximation to be valid , the orbits must be sufficiently far away from each other .
the analysis carried out beyond the scope of the semiclassical approximation @xcite led to @xmath13 and @xmath23 for the `` degenerate '' orbit . in experiments this orbit is ascribed to the hole minority , and the phase @xmath38 measured in ref .
agrees with these @xmath3 and @xmath39 , see table i. in ref .
a new method was developed to determine the phase @xmath20 of the de haas -van alphen oscillations of the magnetic susceptibility .
the appropriate results for @xmath20 and @xmath3 in graphite are presented in table i. however , authors of ref . implied in their analysis of @xmath3 that the sign of @xmath19 in formula ( [ 3 ] ) is positive in the case of electrons and negative for holes .
this is not correct ; the sign is always positive .
a re - examination of the derivation of the lifshits - kosevich formula @xcite proves this statement .
@xcite with this in mind we have corrected @xmath39 and @xmath3 of ref . , and the obtained results are also presented in table i. for the hole minority and for the electron majority @xcite the corrected results coincide with those of williamson _ et al_.@xcite ( but @xmath40 can be caused by the above - mentioned degeneracy of the hole orbits rather than by the two - dimensional spectrum of the hole minority ) . for the hole majority the phases @xmath26 measured in refs . and
the phase @xmath41 obtained by lukyanchuk and kopelevich @xcite means that either the spectrum of these carriers is two dimensional , or if @xmath42 , one obtains @xmath43 .
however , in the semiclassical approximation , @xmath3 can be equal to @xmath44 or to @xmath45 only .
@xcite intermediate values can occur in situations close to the magnetic breakdown .
@xcite in principle , such the situation is possible for the swm model , but it does not occur for the parameters presented in table ii . the parameters of table ii correspond to three dimensional spectrum of graphite and lead to a consistent description of the experimental data @xcite obtained many yeas ago .
however , lukyanchuk and kopelevich @xcite used the highly oriented pyrolytic graphite ( hopg ) with very high ratio of the out - of - plane to basal - plane resistivities ( @xmath46 ) , and in this sample , quantum - hall - effect features were observed which indicate a quasi two dimensional nature of this hopg .
@xcite it was also argued @xcite that in similar samples of hopg an incoherent transport occurs in the direction perpendicular to the graphite layers , and the three dimensional spectrum of carriers seems to fail .
if this conclusion is valid only for the hole majority , it could explain the above - mentioned disagreement .
this also means that the parameters of swm model should be reconsidered to describe the spectrum of such hopg . to conclude
, the phases of the de haas - van alphen oscillations in graphite were measured in refs . . the data of refs .
can be completely explained in the framework of the known band structure of graphite @xcite if one takes into account that four band - contact lines exist near the hkh edge of its brillouin zone .
the data of lukyanchuk and kopelevich @xcite obtained for hopg disagree with the experimental results of refs . for one of the two large cross sections and probably imply that a reconsideration of the energy - band parameters for such hopg is required .
|
graphite electronic properties attract attention due to discovery novel carbon - based materials fullerenes nanotubes from wrapped graphite sheets thin films graphite give promise device applications attention to graphite caused by specific features electron energy spectrum interesting physical effects electronic spectrum graphite described by slonzewski - weiss - mcclure ) model values main parameters found from analysis experimental data review brandt _ et al fermi surface of graphite consists elongated pockets enclosing edge hkh of brillouin zone pockets formed by two majority groups of electrons ( e ) holes ( h ) located near points k h one minority ( m ) low - concentration group of charge carriers in graphite located near point h unresolved problem spectrum exists in edge hkh of brillouin zone two electron energy bands degenerate bands split linearly in deviation of wave vector from edge edge is band - contact lineshown in paper @xmath0-space closed orbit charge carrier surrounds contact line linear wave function after acquires addition phase @xmath1 without band - contact line @xmath2 is berry phase modifies constant @xmath3 semiclassical quantization rule for energy @xmath4 of charge carrier in magnetic fields @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 cross - sectional area of closed orbit @xmath8 component @xmath0 perpendicular to plane orbit @xmath9 large integer @xmath11 absolute value electron charge constant @xmath3 given by formula @xmath12 magnetic field applied along hkh axis orbits of electrons holes in brillouin zone graphite surround axis expect find @xmath13 for orbits instead of value @xmath14 values @xmath13 equivalent value @xmath3 measured using oscillation effects de haas - van alphen effectfirst harmonic de haas - van alphen oscillations magnetic susceptibility form @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 extremal cross section fermi surface metal @xmath8 @xmath19 amplitude harmonic @xmath20 phase given by @xmath21 with @xmath22 minimum maximum cross - section @xmath18 @xmath23 two - dimensional fermi surface eq obtain @xmath24 for maximum cross - sections electron hole majorities in graphite phases @xmath25 @xmath26 measured agree with usual value @xmath27 new method determining phase @xmath20 oscillations found @xmath13 for cross section hole majority in graphite assumed fermi surface holes two - dimensional @xmath28 ) found @xmath27 for maximum cross section electron majority three - dimensional fermi surface majority @xmath29 ) obtained value @xmath13 for holes agrees prediction results new problems band - contact line in graphite penetrates electron hole extremal cross sections cross sections must same @xmath3 parameters swm model graphite electrons holes extremal cross sections three - dimensionalpaper graphite band - contact line edge hkh three additional band lines near edge lines leads to usual value @xmath27 maximum cross sections electron hole majority groups resolve contradiction between theoretical value @xmath3 data refs discuss data ref magnetic field @xmath5 directed along @xmath30 axis maximum electron cross section @xmath31 at @xmath32 maximum cross section hole majority between points k and @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 fermi energy fig 2 cross sections penetrated by four band - contact lines even number band - contact lines change usual value @xmath14 find @xmath14 for maximum cross sections majority groups agrees with experimental results refs discuss value @xmath3 for minority group parameters table ii hole minority near point h results from band @xmath36 minority hole majority band @xmath37 equal cross sections when magnetic field along hkh axis no contact lines bands @xmath36 and @xmath37 penetrate common cross section expect find usual value @xmath14 semiclassical approximation deriving eqs [ 1 ] ) 2 ] ) fails for hole orbits cross section orbits must far analysis beyond semiclassical approximation led to @xmath13 @xmath23 for degenerate orbit orbit ascribed to hole minority phase @xmath38 agrees with @xmath3 @xmath39 table i new method developed determine phase @xmath20 de haas -van alphen oscillations magnetic susceptibility results for @xmath20 @xmath3 in presented in table i. authors implied sign of @xmath19 in formula positive electrons negative for holes not correct sign always positive re - examination lifshits - kosevich formula proves statement corrected @xmath39 @xmath3 results presented in table i. hole minority electron majority corrected results coincide with williamson _ et al_. @xmath40 caused by degeneracy hole orbits two - dimensional spectrum hole minority hole majority phases @xmath26 phase @xmath41 obtained by lukyanchuk kopelevich means spectrum carriers two dimensional or obtains @xmath43 semiclassical approximation @xmath3 can equal to @xmath44 or @xmath45intermediate values occur in close to magnetic breakdown possible for swm model for parameters in table ii parameters table correspond to three dimensional spectrum graphite consistent description experimental data obtained ago lukyanchuk and kopelevich used highly oriented pyrolytic graphite with high ratio out - plane to plane resistivities quantum - hall - effect features observed quasi two dimensional nature argued in similar samples incoherent transport occurs perpendicular to graphite layers three dimensional spectrum of carriers if conclusion valid for hole majority explain disagreement parameters of swm model should reconsidered to describe spectrum hopg phases de haas - van alphen oscillations in graphite measured in refs . data explained in known band structure of graphite four band - contact lines near hkh edge of brillouin zone data lukyanchuk kopelevich for hopg disagree with experimental results refs . reconsideration of energy - band parameters for hopg required
| 0.356251
| 2,381
| 1,184
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,864
|
we have measured both yields of neutron - proton and neutron - neutron pairs emitted from the non - mesonic weak decay process of @xmath0he and @xmath1c hypernuclei produced via the ( @xmath2,@xmath3 ) reaction for the first time .
we observed clean back - to - back correlation of the @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs in the coincidence spectra for both hypernuclei .
the ratio of those back - to - back pair yields , @xmath6 , must be close to the ratio of neutron- and proton - induced decay widths of the decay , @xmath7(@xmath8)/@xmath9(@xmath10 ) .
the obtained ratios for each hypernuclei support recent calculations based on short - range interactions .
|
the non - mesonic weak decay ( nmwd ) process of a @xmath11 hypernucleus , @xmath12 , gives a unique opportunity to study the weak interaction between baryons since this strangeness non - conserving process is purely attributed to the weak interaction . in the nmwd , there are two decay channels , @xmath13 @xmath14 ( @xmath9 ) and @xmath15 @xmath16 ( @xmath7 ) .
the ratio of those decay widths , @xmath7/@xmath9 , is an important observable used to study the isospin structure of the nmwd mechanism . for the past 40 years
, there has been a longstanding puzzle that the experimental @xmath7/@xmath9 ratio disagrees with that of theoretical calculations based on the most natural and simplest model , the one - pion exchange model ( ope ) . in this model ,
the @xmath12 reaction is expressed as a pion absorption process after the @xmath17 decay inside the nucleus .
since the ope process is tensor - dominant and the tensor transition of the initial @xmath18 pair in the @xmath19-state requires the final @xmath20 pair to have isospin zero , the @xmath21 ratio in the ope process becomes close to 0 .
however , previous experimental results have indicated a large @xmath21 ratio ( @xmath221 ) @xcite .
this large discrepancy between the ope - model predictions and the experimental results has stimulated many theoretical studies : the heavy meson exchange model , the direct quark model and the two - nucleon ( 2@xmath23 ) induced model ( @xmath24 ) .
after k. sasaki @xmath25 pointed out an error in the sign of the kaon exchange amplitudes in 2000 @xcite , those theoretical values of the @xmath21 ratio have increased to the level of 0.4@xmath220.7 @xcite .
on the other hand , the experimental data still have large errors ( @xmath21 = 0.93 @xmath26 0.55 for @xmath0he @xcite ) , and it is hard to draw a definite conclusion on the @xmath21 ratio .
when we compare the measured @xmath21 ratio with that obtained in theoretical calculations , the most serious technical problem was a treatment of the re - scattering effect in the residual nucleus , the so - called final state interaction ( fsi ) .
moreover , the possible existence of a multi - nucleon induced process has been discussed theoretically ( such as 2@xmath23-induced process ) , though there has been no experimental evidence .
several nucleon energy spectra from hypernuclear decay have been reported so far @xcite , in which it is however difficult to extract the @xmath21 ratio without theoretical assumptions on the effects of fsi and possible multi - nucleon induced processes .
since the 1@xmath23-induced decay `` @xmath27 '' is two - body process , the outgoing nucleon - nucleon pair suffering no fsi effect must have about 180 degree opening angle and clear energy correlation . in the present experiment , we performed a coincident measurement of the two nucleons , @xmath4 and @xmath5-pairs , in the decay for the first time .
the 1@xmath23-induced processes could be clearly observed by measuring yields of the back - to - back @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs and confirming that the energy sums roughly correspond to their @xmath28-values ( @xmath22150 mev ) .
the measured yields of the coincident back - to - back @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs , @xmath29 , are represented as @xmath30 , where @xmath31 are the number of back - to - back @xmath4(@xmath5)-pair events from the decay ; @xmath32 , @xmath33 and @xmath34 stand for decay - counter acceptances and detection efficiencies and reduction factors ( due to the fsi or / and other non back - to - back processes ) for the @xmath4(@xmath5)-pair , respectively .
it is noteworthy that the reduction factors are approximately canceled out with assumption of the charge symmetry , @xmath35 , when we take the ratio of the @xmath4- and @xmath5-pair yields , @xmath6 . in order to minimize the fsi effect , we selected a light @xmath19-shell hypernucleus , @xmath0he
. in @xmath19-shell hypernucleus , initial relative @xmath18 states must be @xmath36 states , whereas in a @xmath37-shell hypernucleus they may be @xmath38 states . to investigate the @xmath37-wave effect
, we also performed the same experiment for a typical light @xmath37-shell hypernucleus , @xmath1c . in this letter
, we show the opening angle and the energy sum distributions of @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs from the nmwd of @xmath0he and the @xmath39 ratio for both hypernuclei .
the present experiments ( kek - ps e462/e508 ) were carried out at the 12-gev proton synchrotron ( ps ) in the high energy accelerator research organization ( kek ) .
hypernuclei , @xmath0he and @xmath1c , were produced via the ( @xmath2,@xmath3 ) reaction at 1.05 gev/@xmath40 on @xmath41li and @xmath42c targets , respectively .
since the ground state of @xmath43li is above the threshold of @xmath0he @xmath44 , it promptly decays into @xmath0he emitting a low - energy proton .
the @xmath45li ( @xmath2,@xmath3 ) @xmath43li reaction was therefore employed to produce @xmath0he .
the hypernuclear mass spectra were calculated by reconstructing the momenta of incoming @xmath2 and outgoing @xmath3 using a beam - line spectrometer composed of the qqdqq system and the superconducting kaon spectrometer ( sks ) @xcite , respectively .
particles emitted from the decays of @xmath11 hypernuclei were detected by the decay - particle detection system installed symmetrically in the direction to the target in order to maximize acceptance of the back - to - back event for @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs from the nmwd process , as shown in ref.@xcite ( fig . 1 ) .
it was composed of plastic scintillation counters and multi - wire drift chambers .
the decay particles were identified by the time - of - flight and the range .
r0.65 the ground state yields of @xmath0he and @xmath1c are , respectively , about 4.6 @xmath46 10@xmath47 and 6.2 @xmath46 10@xmath47 events , which were one order - of - magnitude higher than those of previous experiments .
the inclusive excitation - energy spectra of @xmath43li and @xmath1c are shown in ref.@xcite ( fig . 2 ) .
upper figures of fig .
[ coinfig ] , ( a ) and ( b ) , show opening angle distributions of @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs at the energy threshold level of 30 mev for both of proton and neutron .
they seem to have clear back - to - back correlations , though these are not corrected the angular dependent acceptance .
the shaded histogram shows estimated nucleon contaminations due to the pion absorption process in which @xmath48 s from the mesonic decay of @xmath11 hypernucleus are absorbed by the materials around the target .
the background was estimated by assuming that the shape of the angular distribution from this @xmath48 absorption process is the same as that from the @xmath48 decay of @xmath11 ( @xmath11 @xmath49 ) formed via the quasi - free formation process ( see ref.@xcite for the detail ) .
the angular distributions of middle of fig .
[ coinfig ] , ( c ) and ( d ) , are corrected for acceptances and efficiencies for @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs , and normalized per nmwd . the estimated contamination due to
the pion absorption stated above are subtracted .
they still have back - to - back correlation , which indicates that the fsi effect is not so severe and 1@xmath23-induced nmwd ( two body process ) is the major one .
lower figures of fig .
[ coinfig ] , ( e ) and ( f ) , show energy sum distributions of the @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs by gating back - to - back events as shown in the upper figures ( @xmath50 ) .
we confirmed that those energy sum distributions have broad peak around these @xmath28-values as expected .
the shaded histogram shows estimated contaminations due to pion absorption as described above , which distributes to lower energy region .
also for @xmath1c , similar distributions of the angle and energy sum of the @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs were obtained in a same way .
we successfully observed @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs from the nmwd of @xmath0he and @xmath1c .
the ratio of the back - to - back @xmath4- and @xmath5-pair yields , @xmath51 , for @xmath0he and @xmath1c were obtained as @xmath52 where the quoted systematic errors mainly come from the neutron detection efficiency ( @xmath22 6 % ) .
they can be approximately regarded as the @xmath21 with assumption of the charge symmetry .
it is now revealed that the @xmath21 ratio is significantly less than unity , thus excluding the earlier claim that the ratio is close to unity @xcite . on the contrary , recent theoretical calculations seem to be supportive to our results being on the increase of the ratio toward 0.5 .
the present results have finally given the answer to the longstanding @xmath21 ratio puzzle , and have made a significant contribution to the study of the nmwd .
|
non - mesonic weak decay ) process of @xmath11 hypernucleus @xmath12 opportunity study weak interaction between baryons attributed to in nmwd two decay channels @xmath13 and ratio of decay widths @xmath7/@xmath9 important isospin structure nmwd mechanism 40 years experimental @xmath7/@xmath9 ratio disagrees with theoretical calculations one - pion exchange model @xmath12 reaction as pion absorption after @xmath17 decay inside nucleus ope process tensor - dominant transition initial requires final @xmath20 pair isospin zero @xmath21 ratio close to 0 previous experimental results indicated large @xmath21 ratio ( ) @xcite discrepancy between ope - model predictions experimental results stimulated theoretical studies heavy meson exchange model direct quark model two - nucleon induced model after sasaki error in kaon exchange amplitudes in 2000 @xcite theoretical values @xmath21 ratio increased to 0.4@xmath220.7 @xcite experimental data have large errors ( @xmath21 = 0.@xmath26 0.55 @xmath0he @xcite hard conclusion @xmath21 ratio measured @xmath21 ratio theoretical calculations serious problem re - scattering effect residual nucleus final state interaction fsi ) multi - nucleon induced process discussed no experimental evidence nucleon energy spectra hypernuclear decay reported difficult extract @xmath21 ratio without theoretical assumptions fsi multi - nucleon induced processes 1@xmath23-induced decay @xmath27 two - body process outgoing nucleon pair no fsi effect 180 degree opening angle clear energy correlation present experiment coincident measurement two nucleons @xmath4 @xmath5-pairs decay first time 1@xmath23-induced processes observed measuring yields back - back @xmath4- @xmath5-pairs energy sums correspond @xmath28-values @xmath22150 mev )measured yields coincident back - @xmath4- @xmath5-pairs represented as @xmath30 @xmath31 number back - @xmath4-pair events from decay @xmath32 for decay - counter acceptances detection efficiencies reduction factors processes for @xmath4(-pair reduction factors canceled with charge symmetry @xmath35 ratio @xmath4- @xmath5-pair yields minimize fsi effect selected light @xmath19-shell hypernucleus initial @xmath18 states be @xmath36 states @xmath37-shell @xmath38 states @xmath37-wave effect same experiment for typical light @xmath37-shell hypernucleus @xmath1c opening angle energy sum distributions of @xmath4- @xmath5-pairs from nmwd @xmath0he @xmath39 ratio for hypernuclei experiments at 12-gev proton synchrotron high energy accelerator research organization hypernuclei @xmath0he @xmath1c produced via @xmath2,@xmath3 ) reaction at 1.05 gev/@xmath40 on @xmath41li @xmath42c targetsground state @xmath43li above threshold decays into @xmath0he emitting low - energy proton @xmath45li @xmath43li reaction @xmath0he hypernuclear mass spectra calculated reconstructing momenta @xmath2 @xmath3 using beam - line spectrometer qqdqq system superconducting spectrometer particles from decays @xmath11 hypernuclei detected by decay - particle detection system back - to - back event @xmath4- @xmath5-pairs ref. plastic scintillation counters multi - wire drift chambers decay particles identified by time - of - flight range ground state yields of @xmath0he @xmath1c 4.6 6.2 @xmath46 10 events higher than previous experiments inclusive excitation - energy spectra @xmath43li @xmath1c shown in ref.@xcite ( fig . 2 ) figures show opening angle distributions @xmath4- @xmath5-pairs at energy threshold level 30 mev proton neutron clear back - to - back correlations angular dependent acceptanceshaded histogram shows nucleon contaminations due to pion absorption @xmath48 s from mesonic decay @xmath11 hypernucleus absorbed by materials around target background estimated angular distribution from @xmath48 absorption same as decay of @xmath11 via quasi - free formation see ref. angular distributions of corrected for acceptances efficiencies for @xmath4- @xmath5-pairs normalized per nmwd estimated contamination due to pion absorption subtracted have back - to - back correlation fsi effect not severe 1@xmath23-induced nmwd major lower figures show energy sum distributions of @xmath4- @xmath5-pairs by back - to - back events peak around @xmath28-values shaded histogram shows contaminations due to pion absorption distributes to lower energy region similar distributions of energy sum of @xmath4- @xmath5-pairs obtained observed @xmath4- and @xmath5-pairs from nmwd of @xmath0he @xmath1cratio - to @xmath4- @xmath5-pair yields @xmath51 @xmath0he @xmath1c obtained as @xmath52 systematic errors from neutron detection efficiency @xmath22 6 % ) regarded as @xmath21 charge symmetry @xmath21 ratio less than unity excluding claim close to unity @xcite recent theoretical calculations supportive results increase ratio toward 0.5 present results answer @xmath21 ratio puzzle significant contribution to study nmwd
| 0.353492
| 2,235
| 1,188
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,865
|
we recently argued @xcite that the collective properties of radio loud active galactic nuclei point to the existence of two families of sources , one of powerful sources with single velocity jets and one of weaker jets with significant velocity gradients in the radiating plasma .
these families also correspond to different accretion modes and therefore different thermal and emission line intrinsic properties : powerful sources have radiatively efficient accretion disks , while in weak sources accretion must be radiatively inefficient . here , after we briefly review of our recent work , we present the following findings that support our unification scheme : ( @xmath0 ) along the broken sequence of aligned objects , the jet kinetic power increases .
( @xmath1 ) in the powerful branch of the sequence of aligned objects the fraction of blls decreases with increasing jet power .
( @xmath2 ) for powerful sources , the fraction of blls increases for more un - aligned objects , as measured by the core to extended radio emission .
our results are also compatible with the possibility that a given accretion power produces jets of comparable kinetic power .
|
* the sequence . * in blazars , radio loud active galactic nuclei ( agn ) with their relativistic jet axis pointing to our line of sight , the synchrotron peak frequency ( @xmath3 ) covers a wide range ( @xmath4 hz ) , with bllacs ( bll , lineless blazars ) spanning the entire range and fsrqs ( flat spectrum radio quasars , sources with strong broad emission lines ) having lower @xmath3 ( @xmath5 hz ) .
following @xcite , we adopt the generic terms for low , intermediate , and high _ synchrotron - peaking _ ( lsp , isp , hsp ) blazars independently of the spectroscopic type .
@xcite found that as the source synchrotron power @xmath6 increases , @xmath3 decreases , with predominantly fsrq sources at the low @xmath3 , high @xmath6 end through lsp , isp , and finally hsp bllacs at the low @xmath6 end .
they also used the sparse _ egret _ data to argue that the same reduction of the peak frequency happens in the high energy - presumably inverse compton ( ic ) component - component and that the compton dominance ( the ratio of ic to synchrotron power ) increases with source power .
@xcite suggested that more efficient cooling of particles in the jets of high luminosity blazars is responsible for the lower peak frequencies . * from sequence to envelope . *
@xcite and @xcite identified relatively powerful sources with a radio to x - ray spectral index @xmath7 typical of weak sources with @xmath3 in the x - rays .
such sources , if confirmed , challenge the sequence . upon close study , however , their x - ray emission was found not to be of synchrotron origin @xcite and as of now sources with high @xmath6 - high @xmath3 have not been found @xcite .
sources below the blazar sequence are expected from jets less aligned to the line of sight .
indeed , @xcite found that new sources they identified modify the blazar sequence to an _ envelope_. * challenges .
* @xcite found several low @xmath6 - low @xmath3 sources that , because they have a high core dominance ( @xmath8 , ratio of core and therefore beamed to extended and therefore isotropic radio emission ) , are not intrinsically bright sources at a larger jet angle .
these sources challenge the sequence because ( @xmath0 ) both intrinsically weak and intrinsically powerful jets can have similar @xmath3 and ( @xmath1 ) intrinsically weak jets can produce a wide range of @xmath3 from ( @xmath9 - @xmath10 hz ) .
another challenge came from @xcite who showed that , contrary to what is anticipated by the sequence , high and low synchrotron peak frequency ( hsp and lsp ) bl lacertae objects ( blls , blazars with emission line ew @xmath11 ) have similar @xmath12 .
these findings challenge the sequence , even after being extended to include the sources in the envelope as de - beamed analogs of the blazar sequence sources .
@xcite argued that at a critical value of the accretion rate @xmath13 , the accretion switches from a standard radiatively efficient thin disk with accretion - related emission power @xmath14 for @xmath15 , to a radiatively inefficient mode where @xmath16 .
this critical point may be connected to the transition between fanaroff riley ( fr ; * ? ? ? * ) ii to fr i radio galaxies ( rg ) : the level of the low frequency extended radio emission ( coming mostly from the radio lobes and considered to be isotropic ) that separates fr i and fr ii rg , has been shown to be a function of the host galaxy optical magnitude @xcite : the division between fr i and fr ii is at higher radio luminosities for brighter galaxies .
@xcite argued that , because the optical magnitude of a galaxy is related to the central black home mass @xcite and the extended radio luminosity is related to the jet kinetic luminosity ( following the scaling of * ? ? ?
* ) , this division can be casted as a division in terms of the fraction of the eddington luminosity carried by the jet : jets with kinetic luminosity @xmath17 give rise to fr i rg , while jets with @xmath18 are predominantly fr ii sources .
interestingly , and in agreement with the unification scheme , @xcite and @xcite find that the same dichotomy applies to separating blls and fsrq , the aligned versions of fr i and fr ii respectively . finally , it is very intriguing that @xcite argue that there is a paucity of sources around @xmath19 .
fr i , low line excitation fr ii and some high line excitation fr ii were found to occupy the low @xmath20 regime , while the high @xmath20 regime was occupied by high line excitation fr ii , broad line radio galaxies and powerful radio quasars .
track ( a ) shows the path of a synchrotron peak for a single speed jet in an environment of radiatively efficient accretion and ( b ) for a decelerating jet of the type hypothesized to exist in fri sources as the jet orientation changes.__,width=268 ]
recently , we ( * ? ? ?
* heretofore m11 ) compiled the largest sample of radio loud agn for which sufficient data existed to determine variability - averaged @xmath3 @xmath6 , as well as the extended low frequency radio emission @xmath12 .
this is an important quantity in our study , because it has been shown to be a good proxy for the jet kinetic power @xmath21 , as measured by the energy required to inflate the x - ray cavities seen to coincide with the radio lobes of a number of sources ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) . the picture that emerges ( figure [ m11 ] ) exhibits some important differences with the blazar sequence .
in particular , isp blls have @xmath21 comparable to that of hsp and lsp blls .
also , although all the fr i galaxies were found to have similar @xmath21 with blls , no fr i galaxies were found with @xmath22 hz .
because there is no obvious selection acting against the detection of fr i galaxies with core sed peaking at higher energies , we are lead to conclude that the un - aligned versions of hsp blazars have @xmath3 smaller by a factor of least @xmath23 compared to their aligned equivalent , something that agrees with the existence of velocity profiles in the emitting plasma , as supported by other investigations ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
in m11 we suggested that _ extragalactic jets can be described in terms of two families_. the first is that of weak jets characterized by velocity profiles and weak or absent broad emission lines .
hsps ( @xmath24 hz ) , isps ( @xmath25 hz ) , and fr i rg belong to this family . on the basis of having similar @xmath21 with hsps and fr
i rg , the isp sources were argued to be somewhat un - aligned hsps .
the second family is that of more powerful jets having a single lorentz factor emitting plasma and , in most cases , stronger broad emission lines .
interestingly , the two families divide at @xmath26 erg s@xmath27 , which for @xmath28 , corresponds to @xmath29 , similar to the @xmath30 of @xcite . aligned sources are found along the broken power sequence depicted by the solid lines a and b with a ( b ) corresponding to jets in radiatively efficient ( inefficient ) accretion environments with @xmath31 ( @xmath32 ) . the broken lines a and b depict the tracks followed by two sources as they depart from the power sequence and their orientation angle @xmath33 increases . while in the first case a single velocity flow is assumed , in the second case emission from a decelerating flow
is considered @xcite . .
see text for the description of boxes a , b , c and zones @xmath34.__,width=268 ]
we now discuss some predictions of the new unification scheme and their confirmation from the current data . * @xmath35 increases along the two branches of the broken power sequence .
* we examine now if along the two branches of the power sequence , depicted schematically by the red and blue arrows in the figure [ prelim ] , @xmath21 increases . to do that , we select those sources that are close to the sequence of powerful aligned objects and split them in three groups a , b , c , as seen in figure [ prelim ] . in figure [ powerful ]
we plot the @xmath21 distribution of sources in these three groups .
as expected , the average @xmath21 increases from group c to a. running the same test for jets with inefficient accretion requires to use sources that are not aligned , because of the small number of sources .
for this reason , we select all low power sources with @xmath36 to insure that we do not have any mixing with sources of the other branch and we separate them in the three groups @xmath37 ( figure [ prelim ] ) separated by the de - beaming tracks of a decelerating jet depicted also in figure [ m11 ] .
as can be seen in figure [ weak ] , the average @xmath21 increases from group @xmath38 to @xmath39 , according to our expectations . * as @xmath35 increases , the fraction of the blls decreases along the powerful sequence . * as @xmath21 increases along the powerful sequence , @xmath6 increases , but @xmath3 decreases . at the same time , if we assume that @xmath21 scales with accretion power , we expect that the blr luminosity increases
. if @xmath3 did not change , we would expect that the ratio of the blr to optical synchrotron emission would not change .
but @xmath3 does decrease as @xmath21 increases , shifting the synchrotron component to lower frequencies and revealing more of the blr .
thus we expect that the fraction of sources that is classified as blls will become smaller as @xmath21 increases along the powerful sequence .
this is clearly seen in figure [ powerful ] , with the fraction of blls clearly decreases as @xmath21 decreases .
* for powerful sources , the fraction of blls increases for less aligned sources . * in our scheme
, we expect that for powerful sources of a given @xmath21 , as they become more un - aligned , the beamed synchrotron emission will decrease , while the blr luminosity will be much less affected , resulting to a decreasing fraction of blls for more un - aligned sources . to address this , we selected sources with @xmath40 erg s@xmath27 ( orange sources in figure [ prelim ] ) and we plotted the fraction of blls as a function of radio core dominance @xmath41 which is an orientation indicator .
as can be seen in figure [ bll_fraction ] , as the core dominance decreases , the fraction of blls quickly decreases , in agreement with our expectations .
* a given accretion power @xmath42 corresponds to a narrow @xmath35 range .
* we collected black hole masses from the literature for most of the sources of m11 and used them to calculate the ratio of @xmath43 .
we plot our results in figure [ mcrit ] : in blue sources with @xmath44 hz , almost exclusively blls , therefore radiatively inefficient accretors ; in red sources with @xmath45 hz and @xmath46 erg s@xmath27 , almost all fsrqs , therefore radiatively efficient accretors .
the separation of red and blue sources at @xmath47 suggests that there is a transition at @xmath48 with radiatively efficient accretion at @xmath49 and that sources with a given accretion power do not produce jets with @xmath21 significantly smaller or larger than their accretion power .
|
sequence blazars active galactic nuclei relativistic jet axis line sight synchrotron peak frequency @xmath3 covers wide range @xmath4 hz bllacs spanning range fsrqs lower @xmath3 ( @xmath5 hz ) @xcite terms for low intermediate high synchrotron - peaking blazars spectroscopic type @xcite found source synchrotron power @xmath6 increases @xmath3 decreases predominantly fsrq sources at low @xmath3 high @xmath6 hsp bllacs at low @xmath6 end data reduction peak frequency in high energy - compton ic ) component - component compton dominance ic to synchrotron power increases with source power @xcite suggested efficient cooling of particles in high luminosity blazars lower peak frequencies sequence envelope @xcite identified powerful sources with radio to x - ray spectral index @xmath7 typical of weak sources with @xmath3 x challenge sequence x - ray emission not synchrotron origin sources with high @xmath6 - high @xmath3 foundsources below blazar sequence expected from jets less aligned @xcite found new sources modify blazar sequence to envelope @xcite found low @xmath6 - low @xmath3 sources high core dominance beamed isotropic radio emission not intrinsically bright at larger jet angle sources challenge sequence weak and powerful jets have similar @xmath3 weak jets produce wide range of @xmath3 from @xmath9 - @xmath10 hz challenge from @xcite showed high and low synchrotron peak frequency lacertae objects have similar @xmath12 findings challenge sequence even after extended to include sources envelope as de - beamed analogs of blazar sequence sources @xcite argued at critical value of accretion rate @xmath13 accretion switches from efficient thin disk to inefficient modecritical point transition between fanaroff riley ii to fr i radio galaxies low frequency extended radio emission from lobes isotropic separates fr i and fr ii host galaxy optical magnitude division between fr i fr ii higher radio luminosities for brighter galaxies optical magnitude related to central black home mass extended radio luminosity jet kinetic luminosity division fraction eddington luminosity carried by jet jets with kinetic luminosity @xmath17 give rise to fr i rg jets @xmath18 predominantly fr ii sources same dichotomy applies to separating blls and fsrq aligned versions of fr i and fr ii paucity of sources around @xmath19 low line excitation fr ii high line excitation fr ii low @xmath20 regime high @xmath20 regime occupied by high line excitation fr ii broad line radio galaxies powerful radio quasars track shows path synchrotron peak for single speed jet in radiatively efficient accretion decelerating jet fri sources as jet orientation changes,width=268 recently compiled largest sample radio loud agn data variability - averaged @xmath3 @xmath6 extended low frequency radio emission @xmath12 important quantity study good proxy for jet kinetic power @xmath21 measured by energy inflate x - ray cavities radio lobes sources picture figure m11 exhibits differences with blazar sequence isp blls have @xmath21 comparable to hsp lsp blls fr i galaxies similar @xmath21 with blls no fr i galaxies with @xmath22 hz no obvious selection against detection fr i galaxies with core sed peaking at higher energies conclude un - aligned versions hsp blazars have @xmath3 smaller by factor least @xmath23 compared aligned equivalent agrees with velocity profiles in emitting plasma supported investigations suggested extragalactic jets described two families first weak jets velocity profiles weak broad emission lines hsps ( @xmath24 hz isps ( @xmath25 hz ) fr i rg belong to this family similar @xmath21 with hsps fr i rg isp sources argued be un - aligned hsps second family powerful jets single lorentz factor emitting plasma stronger broad emission lines two families divide at @xmath26 s@xmath27 @xmath28 corresponds to @xmath29 similar @xmath30 @xcite aligned sources along broken power sequence solid lines a and b jets radiatively efficient inefficient accretion environments @xmath31 ( @xmath32 ) broken lines a b depict tracks two sources angle @xmath33 increases first case single velocity flow assumed second case emission from decelerating flow considered @xcite text description boxes a b c zones @xmath34 discuss predictions new unification scheme confirmation from current data @xmath35 increases along two branches broken power sequence examine if red blue arrows @xmath21 increases select sources close to sequence aligned split in three groups a b c figure prelim plot @xmath21 distribution sources groups average @xmath21 increases from group c to a test for jets inefficient accretion requires sources not aligned small number sourcesselect low power sources with @xmath36 mixing with sources other branch separate in three groups @xmath37 separated by de - beaming tracks decelerating jet figure average @xmath21 increases from @xmath38 to @xmath39 expectations @xmath35 increases fraction blls decreases @xmath21 increases @xmath6 increases @xmath3 decreases if @xmath21 scales with accretion power blr luminosity increases if @xmath3 change ratio blr to optical synchrotron emission change @xmath3 as @xmath21 increases shifting synchrotron to lower frequencies revealing more blr expect fraction of sources as blls smaller as @xmath21 increases in figure fraction of blls decreases as @xmath21 decreases powerful sources fraction of blls increases for less aligned sources for powerful sources of @xmath21 more un - aligned beamed synchrotron emission decrease blr luminosity less affected decreasing fraction of blls for more un - aligned sourcesselected sources with @xmath40@xmath27 orange sources plotted fraction of blls radio core dominance @xmath41 orientation indicator core dominance decreases fraction blls decreases expectations accretion power @xmath42 corresponds narrow @xmath35 range collected black hole masses sources calculate ratio @xmath43 results figure blue sources @xmath44 hz exclusively blls radiatively inefficient accretors red sources @xmath45 hz @xmath46@xmath27 almost all fsrqs radiatively efficient accretors separation red blue sources at @xmath47 suggests transition at @xmath48 efficient accretion at @xmath49 sources accretion power produce jets with @xmath21 smaller larger than accretion power
| 0.433058
| 2,653
| 1,377
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,870
|
we have employed our recently developed green s function formalism to study the dielectric behavior of a model membrane , formed by two periodic interfaces separating two media of different dielectric constants .
the maxwell s equations are converted into a surface integral equation ; thus it greatly simplifies the solutions and yields accurate results for membranes of arbitrary shape .
the integral equation is solved and dielectric dispersion spectrum is obtained for a model corrugated membrane .
we report a giant dielectric dispersion as the amplitude of corrugation becomes large .
|
it is known that lipid bilayers ( abound in living cells membranes ) exhibit a ripple phase of the bilayer - water interface , in a narrow temperature range @xcite .
the ripple phase is characterized by permanent wave - like deformations of the interfaces , the origin of which is still a widely debated topic .
however , it was observed that a giant dielectric dispersion can occur in the radiofrequency range , signified by a large dielectric increment in that frequency range @xcite . in practice , these membrane systems are under intensive research because they are responsible for delivery and retention of drugs @xcite .
we aim to obtain some results on the dielectric dispersion spectrum of corrugated membranes , by using our recently developed green s function formalism of periodic interfaces @xcite . in that formalism
, we obtained an analytic expression for the greenian that includes the effect of periodicity . in this work ,
we extend the green s function formalism to compute the local field distribution for a lipid bilayer membrane of arbitrary shape , separating two media of different dielectric constants .
we will calculate the effective dielectric constant of the membrane subject to an ac applied field .
the green s function formalism has been published recently @xcite .
here we re - iterate the formalism to establish notation .
we will apply the formalism to a single interface and then extend to a bilayer membrane . the electrostatic potential satisfies the laplace s equation : @xmath0 = -4\pi \rho({\bf r } ) , \label{electrostatics}\end{aligned}\]]with standard boundary conditions on the interface , where @xmath1 is the free charge density , @xmath2 equals @xmath3 in the host and @xmath4 in the embedding medium .
let @xmath5 and @xmath6 be the volume of the embedding and host medium , separated by an interface @xmath7 . denoting @xmath8 if @xmath9 and 0 otherwise , leads to an integral equation @xcite : @xmath10\phi({\bf r } ) = \phi_0({\bf r } ) + { u\over 4\pi } \oint_s ds'\left [ \hat{\bf n } ' \cdot \nabla ' g({\bf r } , { \bf r } ' ) \right ] \phi({\bf r } ' ) , \label{integral}\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath11 , @xmath12 is unit normal to @xmath7 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 is the solution of @xmath15 .
accordingly , our approach aims to solve a surface integral equation for the potential at the expense of a two - step solution @xcite : 1 .
step 1 : determine @xmath16 for all * r * @xmath17 by solving eq.([integral ] ) , and then 2 .
step 2 : obtain @xmath16 for all * r * by using eq.([integral ] ) and the results of step 1 . in step 1 , we encounter a singularity when the integration variable @xmath18 approaches the point of observation * r*. to circumvent the problem , we take an infinitesimal volume around * r * and perform the surface integral analytically
, we find @xcite @xmath19 \phi({\bf r } ' ) , \ \ \ { \bf r } \in s , \label{r_in_s}\end{aligned}\]]where `` prime '' denotes a restricted integration which excludes @xmath20 .
the ( surface ) integral equation ( [ r_in_s ] ) can be solved for @xmath21 .
here we apply the integral equation formalism to a periodic interface .
suppose the interface profile depends only on @xmath22 , described by @xmath23 , where @xmath24 is a periodic function of @xmath22 with period @xmath25 : @xmath26 .
without loss of generality , we will let @xmath27 in subsequent studies .
thus medium 1 occupies the space @xmath28 while medium 2 occupies the space @xmath29 separated by the interface at @xmath23 .
the external field is @xmath30 and @xmath31 is the potential . for a periodic system
, @xmath16 is a periodic function of the lattice vector @xmath32 . in what follows ,
we adopt similar treatment as the korringa , kohn and rostoker ( kkr ) method @xcite and rewrite the integral equation as : @xmath33where the integration is performed within a _ unit cell_. the structure green s function ( greenian ) is given by @xcite : @xmath34we were able to evaluate the greenian analytically @xcite : @xmath35 \over \cos 2\pi ( x - x ' ) - \cosh 2\pi ( y - f(x ' ) ) } .
\label{greenian}\end{aligned}\]]eq.([greenian ] ) is a truly remarkable result the analytic expression is valid for an arbitrary interface profile .
if the point of observation @xmath36 is located at the interface , the greenian has a finite limit as @xmath37 : @xmath38we first solve eq.([unit - cell ] ) for the potential @xmath39 right at the interface : @xmath40then we use eq.([integral ] ) to find the potential at any arbitrary point @xmath41 , using the potential at the interface .
@xmath42for @xmath43 and @xmath44 respectively .
here we extend the formalism to a bilayer membrane . consider two interface profiles described by @xmath45 , where @xmath46 denote the lower and upper interface profiles respectively .
again @xmath47 is a periodic function of @xmath22 .
thus medium 1 occupies the space @xmath48 while medium 2 occupies the space @xmath49 and @xmath50 . for the upper ( lower ) profile , @xmath51 ( @xmath52 ) ,
thus the greenian becomes @xmath53 \over \cos 2\pi(x - x ' ) - \cosh2\pi(f_t(x ) - f_{t'}(x'))}.\end{aligned}\]]the effective dielectric constant @xmath54 of the bilayer membrane satisfies the relation : @xmath55 where @xmath5 is the volume of the embedded medium .
as @xmath56 , the volume integration can be converted into a surface integration by the green s theorem . moreover , for the upper ( lower ) profile , @xmath51 ( @xmath52 ) , thus the effective dielectric constant becomes @xmath57.\end{aligned}\ ] ] to solve the integral equation , we express the potential at an arbitrary point into a mode expansion : @xmath58where @xmath59 and @xmath60 are mode functions .
the potential on the interfaces suffices : @xmath61where @xmath62 . here
we make a few remarks on the choice of the mode functions .
the choice of the mode function is somewhat arbitrary in theory . in practice
, these functions should be simple and easy to use .
common choice ranges from extended mode functions like the fourier series expansions to localized mode functions like the step and triangular functions @xcite . substituting the mode expansion eq.([mode - a ] ) into eq.([unit - cell ] ) , the coefficients @xmath63 satisfy the matrix equation : @xmath64 { \bf a } = -e_0 { \bf v},\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath65it should be remarked that the mode functions need not be orthonormal and the matrix b is non - diagonal in general .
as a model bilayer membrane , we adopt the interface profiles : @xmath66 where @xmath67 is the amplitude of corrugation , and the sine function is added to upset the reflection symmetry about @xmath68 @xcite .
the width of the bilayer membrane is thus unity .
we adopt the step functions for the mode expansions : @xmath69 where @xmath70 is the width of the step function . in what follows
, we adopt 100 step functions both for the lower and upper profiles , equally spaced in the unit interval @xmath71 $ ] .
the integrals eqs.(16)(18 ) can be readily performed .
to study the dielectric behavior , we apply an ac field at a frequency @xmath72 .
the embedded medium inside the membrane has a complex dielectric constant @xmath73 where @xmath4 and @xmath74 are the dielectric constant and conductivity of the embedded medium respectively , with @xmath72 being the frequency of the applied field .
we adopt the following parameters in the calculation : @xmath75 , while @xmath76 . also let @xmath77 .
the maxwell - wagner relaxation time of a planar interface is given by : @xmath78 in fig.[fig1 ] , we plot ( a ) the real and ( b ) imaginary parts of the complex effective dielectric constant @xmath54 normalized to @xmath3 as function of frequency for various amplitude of corrugation @xmath67 ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 . as is evident from fig.[fig1 ]
, there is a giant dielectric dispersion as the amplitude of corrugation becomes large ( @xmath79 ) . in summary ,
we have employed the green s function formalism to study the dielectric behavior of a corrugated membrane . the integral equation is solved and the dielectric dispersion spectrum is obtained for a periodic corrugated membrane .
we should remark that the present formalism can readily be generalized to multi - layers systems as well as corrugations in two dimensions @xcite .
this work was supported by the research grants council of the hong kong sar government under grant cuhk 4245/01p .
k. w. yu acknowledges useful conversation with professor hong sun .
g. s. smith , e. b. sirota , g. r. safinya and n. a. clark , phys .
lett . * 60 * , 813 ( 1988 ) ; m. p. hentschel and f. rustichelli , phys .
lett . * 66 * , 903 ( 1991 ) .
a. raudino , f. castelli , g. briganti and c. cametti , j. chem . phys . * 115 * , 8238 ( 2001 )
. k. sugano , h. hamada , m. machida , et al .
* 228 * , 181 ( 2001 ) .
k. w. yu and jones t. k. wan , _ proceedings of the conference on computational physics ( ccp2000 ) _ , comput .
. commun . * 142 * , 368 ( 2001 ) ; see also cond - mat/0102059 .
k. w. yu , hong sun and jones t. k. wan , _ proceedings of the 5th international conference on electrical transport and optical properties of inhomogeneous media _ , physica b * 279 * , 78 ( 2000 ) .
j. korringa , physica * 13 * , 392 ( 1947 ) ; w. kohn and n. rostoker , phys . rev . * 94 * , 1111 ( 1954 ) .
f. c. mackintosh , current opinion in colloid and interface science * 2 * , 382 ( 1997 ) .
|
lipid bilayers exhibit ripple phase narrow temperature range ripple phase by wave - like deformations interfaces origin debated observed giant dielectric dispersion in radiofrequency range large dielectric increment membrane systems under research responsible for delivery retention of drugs aim results on dielectric dispersion spectrum corrugated membranes green s function formalism of periodic interfaces obtained expression for greenian includes effect of periodicity extend s function formalism to compute local field distribution for lipid bilayer membrane arbitrary shape separating two media different dielectric constants calculate effective dielectric constant membrane subject to applied field green s function formalism published recently re - iterate formalism establish notation apply formalism to single interface extend to bilayer membrane electrostatic potential satisfies laplace s equation : @xmath0 = -4\pi \rho( ) standard boundary conditions @xmath1 free charge density @xmath2 equals @xmath3 host embedding medium @xmath5 @xmath6 volume of embedding host medium separated by interface@xmath8 if @xmath9 0 leads to integral equation @xmath10\phi({\bf r } ) = \phi_0({\bf r } ) + 4\pi }{\bf }({\bf r \phi({\bf r } ){integral}{aligned @xmath11 @xmath12 unit normal to @xmath7 solution of @xmath15 approach solve surface integral equation two - step solution determine @xmath16 for @xmath17 solving eq.([integral ] ) obtain @xmath16 for all r using eq.([integral ] ) results step 1 singularity when integration variable @xmath18 approaches point observation circumvent problem infinitesimal volume around r perform surface integral find @xmath19 \phi({\bf r } ' )\bf r }}{aligned} prime '' restricted integration excludes @xmath20 surface integral equation r solved for @xmath21 apply integral equation formalism to periodic interfaceinterface profile depends on @xmath22 by @xmath23 @xmath24 periodic function of @xmath22 period @xmath25 : @xmath26 @xmath27 in subsequent studies medium 1 occupies @xmath28 medium 2 @xmath29 separated by interface @xmath23 external field is @xmath30 @xmath31 potential @xmath16 periodic function of lattice vector @xmath32 adopt treatment rewrite integral equation as integration within unit cell structure green function given by @xcite : evaluate greenian analytically @xcite @xmath35 2 x - 2\pi ( y - f(x.( remarkable result analytic expression valid for arbitrary interface profile point of observation @xmath36 at interface greenian finite limit as @xmath37 : solve eq.([unit - cell for potential @xmath39 at interface use eq. find potential at arbitrary point @xmath41 @xmath43 and @xmath44 extend formalism to bilayer membrane two interface profiles by @xmath45 @xmath46 lower and upper interface profiles @xmath47 periodic function of @xmath22medium 1 occupies @xmath48 medium 2 @xmath49 upper lower profile @xmath51 @xmath52 ) greenian becomes @xmath53 2\pi(x - x -\pi(f_t(x - effective dielectric constant @xmath54 bilayer membrane satisfies relation @xmath55 @xmath5 volume embedded medium @xmath56 volume integration converted into surface integration by green s theorem upper lower profile @xmath51 ( @xmath52 ) effective dielectric constant becomes @xmath57. integral express potential arbitrary point into mode expansion @xmath58where @xmath59 @xmath60 mode functions potential interfaces suffices @xmath61where @xmath62 remarks choice mode functions arbitrary simple easy use extended localized substituting mode expansion eq.([mode - a ] ) into eq.([unit - cell ] ) coefficients @xmath63 satisfy matrix equation @xmath64 { \bf a } = -e_0 { \bf v} mode functions not orthonormal matrix b non - diagonalmodel bilayer membrane adopt interface profiles @xmath66 @xmath67 amplitude corrugation sine function added reflection symmetry @xmath68 width membrane unity adopt step functions mode expansions @xmath69 @xmath70 width step function adopt 100 step functions lower upper profiles equally spaced unit interval @xmath71 integrals eqs.(16)(18 ) performed study dielectric behavior apply ac field frequency @xmath72 embedded medium complex dielectric constant @xmath73 @xmath4 @xmath74 dielectric constant conductivity @xmath72 frequency applied field adopt parameters calculation @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 maxwell - wagner relaxation time planar interface @xmath78 fig. plot real imaginary parts complex effective dielectric constant @xmath54 normalized @xmath3 function frequency amplitude corrugation @xmath67 0.1 to 1.0 giant dielectric dispersion amplitude corrugation large @xmath79 employed green s function formalism study dielectric behavior corrugated membrane integral equation solved dielectric dispersion spectrum obtained periodic corrugated membrane formalism generalized multi - layers systems corrugations two dimensionswork supported research grants council hong kong government grant 4245/01p k w yu conversation professor hong sun smith sirota safinya clark phys. 60 813 ( 1988 ) hentschel rustichelli phys 66 903 ( 1991 ) raudino castelli briganti cametti chem 115 8238 ( 2001 ) sugano hamada machida 228 181 ( 2001 ) k w. yu jones t k wan proceedings conference computational physics ) 142 368 ( 2001 ) cond - mat/0102059 k w. yu hong sun jones wan proceedings 5th international conference electrical transport optical properties inhomogeneous media physica 279 78 ( 2000 ) korringa physica 13 392 ( 1947 ) kohn rostoker phys. 94 1111 ( 1954 ). mackintosh opinion colloid interface science 2 382 ( 1997 )
| 0.355018
| 2,509
| 1,288
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,877
|
we have searched for neutrinoless @xmath0 lepton decays into @xmath1 and @xmath2 , where @xmath1 stands for an electron or muon , and @xmath2 for a vector meson ( @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 or @xmath6 ) , using 543 fb@xmath7 of data collected with the belle detector at the kekb asymmetric - energy @xmath8 collider . no excess of signal events over the expected background is observed , and we set upper limits on the branching fractions in the range @xmath9 at the 90% confidence level .
these upper limits include the first results for @xmath10 as well as new limits that are @xmath11 times more restrictive than our previous results for @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 .
|
in the standard model ( sm ) , lepton - flavor - violating ( lfv ) decays of charged leptons are forbidden ; even if neutrino mixing is taken into account , they are still highly suppressed .
however , lfv is expected to appear in many extensions of the sm .
some such models predict branching fractions for @xmath0 lfv decays at the level of @xmath15 @xcite , which can be reached at the present b - factories .
observation of lfv will then provide evidence for new physics beyond the sm . in this paper , we report on a search for lfv in @xmath16 decays into neutrinoless final states with one charged lepton @xmath17 and one vector meson @xmath2 : @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 @xcite .
a search for the @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 modes was performed for the first time at the cleo detector , where 90% confidence level ( cl ) upper limits ( ul ) for the branching fractions in the range @xmath29 were obtained using a data sample of 4.79 fb@xmath7 @xcite .
later we carried out a search for these modes in the belle experiment using 158 fb@xmath7 of data and set upper limits in the range @xmath30 @xcite . here
we present results of a new search based on a data sample of 543 fb@xmath7 corresponding to @xmath31 @xmath0-pairs collected with the belle detector @xcite at the kekb asymmetric - energy @xmath32 collider @xcite .
the belle detector is a large - solid - angle magnetic spectrometer that consists of a silicon vertex detector , a 50-layer central drift chamber , an array of aerogel threshold cherenkov counters , a barrel - like arrangement of time - of - flight scintillation counters , and an electromagnetic calorimeter comprised of csi(tl ) crystals located inside a superconducting solenoid coil that provides a 1.5 t magnetic field .
an iron flux - return located outside the coil is instrumented to detect @xmath33 mesons and identify muons . the detector is described in detail elsewhere @xcite .
two inner detector configurations were used .
a 2.0 cm radius beam - pipe and a 3-layer silicon vertex detector were used for the first sample of 158 fb@xmath7 , while a 1.5 cm radius beam - pipe , a 4-layer silicon detector and a small - cell inner drift chamber were used to record the remaining 385 fb@xmath7 @xcite .
we search for @xmath34 , @xmath10 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 candidates in which one @xmath0 decays into a final state with a @xmath1 , two charged hadrons ( 3-prong decay ) , and the other @xmath0 decays into one charged particle ( 1-prong decay ) , any number of @xmath35 s and missing particle(s ) .
we reconstruct @xmath3 candidates from @xmath36 , @xmath4 from @xmath37 , @xmath5 from @xmath38 and @xmath6 from @xmath39 .
the selection criteria described below are optimized from studies of monte carlo ( mc ) simulated events and the experimental data in the sideband regions of the @xmath40 and @xmath41 distributions described later . the background ( bg ) mc samples consist of @xmath42 ( 1524 fb@xmath7 ) generated by kkmc @xcite , @xmath43 continuum , and two - photon processes .
the signal mc events are generated assuming a phase space distribution for @xmath0 decay .
the transverse momentum for a charged track is required to be larger than 0.06 gev/@xmath44 in the barrel region ( @xmath45 , where @xmath46 is the polar angle relative to the direction opposite to that of the incident @xmath47 beam in the laboratory frame ) and 0.1 gev/@xmath44 in the endcap region ( @xmath48 and @xmath49 ) .
the energies of photon candidates are required to be larger than 0.1 gev in both regions . to select the signal topology , we require four charged tracks in an event with zero net charge , and a total energy of charged tracks and photons in the center - of - mass ( cm ) frame less than 11 gev .
we also require that the missing momentum in the laboratory frame be greater than 0.6 gev/@xmath44 , and that its direction be within the detector acceptance ( @xmath50 ) , where the missing momentum is defined as the difference between the momentum of the initial @xmath8 system , and the sum of the observed momentum vectors .
the event is subdivided into 3-prong and 1-prong hemispheres with respect to the thrust axis in the cm frame .
these are referred to as the signal and tag side , respectively .
we allow at most two photons on the tag side to account for initial state radiation , while requiring at most one photon for the @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 modes , and two photons except for @xmath51 daughters for the @xmath10 modes on the signal side to reduce the @xmath52 bg .
we require that the muon likelihood ratio @xmath53 be greater than 0.95 for momentum greater than 1.0 gev/@xmath44 and the electron likelihood ratio @xmath54 be greater than 0.9 for momentum greater than 0.5 gev/@xmath44 for the charged lepton - candidate track on the signal side . here
@xmath55 is the likelihood ratio for a charged particle of type @xmath56 ( @xmath57 , @xmath58 , @xmath59 or @xmath60 ) , defined as @xmath61 , where @xmath62 is the likelihood for particle type @xmath56 , determined from the responses of the relevant detectors @xcite .
the efficiencies for muon and electron identification are 92% for momenta
larger than 1.0 gev/@xmath44 and 94% for momenta larger than 0.5 gev/@xmath44 .
candidate @xmath3 mesons are selected by requiring the invariant mass of @xmath36 daughters to be in the range @xmath63 .
we require that both kaon daughters have kaon likelihood ratios @xmath64 and electron likelihood ratios @xmath65 to reduce the background from @xmath32 conversions .
candidate @xmath4 mesons are reconstructed from @xmath37 with the invariant mass requirement @xmath66 .
the @xmath51 candidate is selected from @xmath35 pairs with invariant mass in the range , @xmath67 . in order to improve the @xmath4 mass resolution , the @xmath51 mass is constrained to be 135 mev/@xmath68 for the @xmath4 mass reconstruction .
candidate @xmath5 and
@xmath6 mesons are selected with @xmath69 invariant mass in the range @xmath70 , and requiring that the kaon daughter have @xmath64 and both daughters have @xmath65 .
[ fig : vmass](a , b , c ) show the invariant mass distributions of the @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 candidates for @xmath71 , @xmath72 and @xmath73 , respectively .
the estimated bg distributions agree with the data .
the main bg contribution is due to @xmath52 events with @xmath3 mesons for the @xmath74 mode , @xmath75 with the pion misidentified as a lepton for the @xmath76 mode , and @xmath77 with one pion misidentified as a kaon and another misidentified as a lepton for the @xmath78 and @xmath28 modes . for @xmath71 , ( b ) @xmath79 for @xmath72 and ( c ) @xmath80 for @xmath73 after muon identification .
the points with error bars are data .
the open histogram shows the expected @xmath42 bg mc and the hatched one @xmath52 mc and two - photon mc . the regions between the vertical red lines are selected.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=23.0% ] for @xmath71 , ( b ) @xmath79 for @xmath72 and ( c ) @xmath80 for @xmath73 after muon identification .
the points with error bars are data .
the open histogram shows the expected @xmath42 bg mc and the hatched one @xmath52 mc and two - photon mc . the regions between the vertical red lines are selected.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=23.0% ] for @xmath71 , ( b ) @xmath79 for @xmath72 and ( c ) @xmath80 for @xmath73 after muon identification .
the points with error bars are data .
the open histogram shows the expected @xmath42 bg mc and the hatched one @xmath52 mc and two - photon mc . the regions between the vertical red lines are selected.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=23.0% ] to reduce the remaining bg from @xmath42 and @xmath52 , we require the relations between the missing momentum @xmath81 ( gev/@xmath44 ) and missing mass squared @xmath82 ( ( gev/@xmath68)@xmath83 ) summarized in table [ tbl : vcut ] .
.selection criteria using @xmath81(gev/@xmath44 ) and @xmath82((gev/@xmath68)@xmath83 ) where @xmath81 is missing momentum and @xmath82 is missing mass squared . [
cols="^,^",options="header " , ]
we have searched for lfv decays @xmath74 , @xmath84 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 using a 543 fb@xmath7 data sample from the belle experiment .
no evidence for a signal is observed and upper limits on the branching fractions are set in the range @xmath85 at the 90% confidence level .
this analysis is the first search for @xmath86 modes .
the results for the @xmath74 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 modes are @xmath11 times more restrictive than our previous results obtained using 158 fb@xmath7 of data .
the sensitivity improvement includes a factor of 3.4 in data statistics and an optimized analysis with higher efficiency and much improved bg suppression .
the improved upper limits can be used to constrain the parameter spaces of various scenarios beyond the sm .
we thank the kekb group for the excellent operation of the accelerator , the kek cryogenics group for the efficient operation of the solenoid , and the kek computer group and the national institute of informatics for valuable computing and super - sinet network support .
we acknowledge support from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science , and technology of japan and the japan society for the promotion of science ; the australian research council and the australian department of education , science and training ; the national science foundation of china and the knowledge innovation program of the chinese academy of sciences under contract no .
10575109 and ihep - u-503 ; the department of science and technology of india ; the bk21 program of the ministry of education of korea , the chep src program and basic research program ( grant no .
r01 - 2005 - 000 - 10089 - 0 ) of the korea science and engineering foundation , and the pure basic research group program of the korea research foundation ; the polish state committee for scientific research ; the ministry of education and science of the russian federation and the russian federal agency for atomic energy ; the slovenian research agency ; the swiss national science foundation ; the national science council and the ministry of education of taiwan ; and the u.s.department of energy .
|
standard model lepton - flavor - violating decays charged leptons forbidden neutrino mixing suppressed lfv expected appear in extensions sm models predict branching fractions @xmath0 lfv decays @xmath15 @xcite reached present b - factories observation lfv evidence new physics beyond sm paper search for lfv @xmath16 decays neutrinoless final states one charged lepton @xmath17 one vector meson @xmath2 @xcite search for @xmath26 modes performed cleo detector 90% confidence level upper limits branching fractions range @xmath29 obtained data sample 4.79 fb@xmath7 @xcite search modes belle experiment using 158 fb@xmath7 data set upper limits range @xmath30 @xcite results new search data sample 543 fb@xmath7 @xmath31 @xmath0-pairs collected belle detector kekb asymmetric - energy @xmath32 collider @xcitebelle detector large - solid - angle magnetic spectrometer silicon vertex detector 50-layer central drift chamber aerogel threshold cherenkov counters time - of - flight scintillation counters electromagnetic calorimeter csi(tl ) crystals superconducting solenoid coil 1.5 t magnetic field iron flux - return outside coil @xmath33 mesons muons detector described two detector configurations 2.0 cm radius beam - pipe 3-layer silicon vertex detector for first sample of 158 fb@xmath7 1.5 cm radius beam - pipe 4-layer silicon detector small - cell inner drift chamber remaining 385 fb@xmath7 search for @xmath34 candidates one @xmath0 decays final state other one particle @xmath35 s missing particle reconstruct @xmath3 candidates from @xmath36 @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 selection criteria optimized from simulated events experimental data sideband @xmath40 @xmath41 distributions background mc samples @xmath42 ( 1524 fb@xmath7 @xmath43 continuum two - photon processessignal mc events phase space distribution for @xmath0 decay transverse momentum for charged track larger than 0.06 gev/@xmath44 in barrel region beam 0.1 gev/@xmath44 endcap region energies of photon candidates larger than 0.1 gev both regions signal topology four charged tracks event zero net charge total energy center - mass frame less than 11 gev missing momentum in laboratory frame greater than 0.6 gev/@xmath44 direction within detector acceptance ( @xmath50 ) missing momentum difference between momentum initial @xmath8 system observed momentum vectors event subdivided into 3-prong 1-prong hemispheres thrust axis cm frame signal and tag side two photons on tag side for initial state radiation one photon for @xmath12 modes two photons @xmath10 modes signal side muon likelihood ratio @xmath53 greater than 0.95 for momentum than 1.0 gev/@xmath44 electron likelihood ratio @xmath54 greater than 0.9 for momentum than 0.5 gev/@xmath44 for charged lepton - candidate track@xmath55 likelihood charged particle @xmath56 defined @xmath62 likelihood particle @xmath56 responses detectors efficiencies muon electron identification 92% momenta 1.0 gev/@xmath44 94% 0.5 gev/@xmath44 @xmath3 mesons selected invariant mass @xmath36 daughters @xmath63 kaon daughters kaon ratios @xmath64 electron likelihood ratios @xmath65 reduce background @xmath32 conversions @xmath4 mesons reconstructed from @xmath37 invariant mass requirement @xmath66 @xmath51 candidate selected from @xmath35 pairs invariant mass @xmath67 @xmath51 mass constrained 135 mev/@xmath68 reconstruction @xmath5 @xmath6 mesons selected @xmath69 invariant mass kaon daughter @xmath64 both daughters @xmath65 fig : vmass] invariant mass distributions @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 candidates @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 estimated bg distributions agree with datamain bg contribution due to @xmath52 events @xmath3 mesons mode @xmath75 pion misidentified lepton @xmath77 one pion misidentified kaon another lepton @xmath78 @xmath28 modes @xmath71 @xmath79 @xmath80 after muon identification points with error bars data open histogram shows expected @xmath42 bg mc hatched one @xmath52 mc two - photon mc regions between vertical red lines selected identification points with error bars data open histogram shows expected @xmath42 bg mc hatched one @xmath52 mc two - photon mc regions between vertical red lines selected @xmath71 identification points with error bars data open histogram shows expected @xmath42 bg mc hatched one @xmath52 mc two - photon mc regions between vertical red lines selected to reduce remaining bg from @xmath42 @xmath52 require relations between missing momentum @xmath81 missing mass squared @xmath82 ) summarized in tableselection criteria @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath81 missing momentum missing mass squared searched for lfv decays @xmath74 @xmath28 543 fb@xmath7 data sample belle experiment no evidence signal upper limits branching fractions @xmath85 90% confidence level first search for @xmath86 modes results @xmath74 modes @xmath11 times more restrictive than previous results 158 fb@xmath7 data sensitivity improvement includes factor 3.4 data statistics optimized analysis higher efficiency improved bg suppression improved upper limits constrain parameter spaces scenarios beyond sm thank kekb group kek cryogenics group solenoid kek computer group national institute of informatics super - network support acknowledge support from ministry of education culture sports science technology japan japan society for promotion science australian research council department of education science training national science foundation china knowledge innovation program chinese academy of sciences department of science technology india bk21 program ministry of education korea chep src program basic research program- 2005 - 000 - 10089 - korea science engineering foundation basic research polish committee scientific research ministry education science russian federation agency atomic energy slovenian research agency swiss national science foundation national science council ministry education taiwan u.s.department energy
| 0.430696
| 2,635
| 1,324
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,888
|
we construct an infinite family of simply connected , pairwise nondiffeomorphic 4manifolds , all homeomorphic to @xmath0 .
similar ideas provide examples of 4manifolds with @xmath1 , @xmath2 , vanishing first homology and nontrivial seiberg
witten invariants .
|
many simply connected , smoothable topological 4manifolds ( with @xmath3 odd ) are known to admit infintely many distinct smooth structures . the existence of such _
exotic _ structures are , however , less clear when the euler characteristic of the 4manifold is small , for example if the manifold is homeomorphic to the ( blow up of the ) complex projective plane . using the rational blow down construction @xcite together with knot surgery @xcite in double node neighborhoods @xcite , many new smooth 4manifolds have been discovered with @xmath4 and @xmath5 @xcite .
similar ideas can be applied to get examples of irreducible exotic simply connected 4manifolds with @xmath1 and relatively small @xmath6 .
the study of exotic structures on simply connected manifolds with @xmath1 has a rich history .
recall that the @xmath7 surface @xmath8 is such an example with @xmath9 . applying appropriate logarithmic transformations on @xmath8
it was shown that @xmath10 admits infinitely many smooth structures @xcite
. later works , relying on gompf s symplectic normal connected sum operation , together with donaldson theory showed that the topological manifolds @xmath11 with @xmath12 admit infinitely many smooth structures @xcite .
more recent results of park @xcite proved the same statement with @xmath13 .
our main result in this paper improves this bound : [ t : m1 ] the simply connected topological 4manifold @xmath0 admits infinitely many distinct smooth structures . by modifying the construction used in the proof of theorem [ t : m1 ] , we can define a set of 4manifolds which still have @xmath1 , but their euler characteristic is smaller than the above examples .
in these cases , however , we were unable to show that the manifolds are simply connected .
[ t : m2 ] there are infinitely many pairwise nondiffeomorphic smooth , closed 4manifolds with vanishing first homology , @xmath1 , @xmath2 and nontrivial seiberg witten invariants .
the proof of the results will involve two steps .
first we desribe how to construct the manifolds claimed and then we use seiberg witten theory in proving that they are nondiffeomorphic . in the construction
we will apply mapping class group arguments and the theory of lefschetz fibrations . using the knot surgery construction
then we can identify configurations of curves in the resulting 4manifolds which can be rationally blown down , leading us to the desired examples .
recall that a genus1 lefschetz fibration @xmath14 can be described by the word in the mapping class group @xmath15 of the 2torus @xmath16 corresponding to the monodromy presentation of @xmath17 .
more precisely , a point @xmath18 where @xmath19 is not onto ( called a singular point of the fibration ) gives rise to a singular fiber @xmath20 , and the monodromy of the fibration around such a fiber can be given by the composition of dehn twists along the circles corresponding to the vanishing cycles of the singular points of the fiber . by traversing through the singular fibers in a counterclockwise manner relative to a fixed base point @xmath21 , we get the above mentioned word describing the fibration .
notice that we do not assume that @xmath17 is injective on the set of its singular points , that is , a singular fiber can contain more than one singular points .
the assumption that the map @xmath17 is a lefschetz fibration implies that the vanishing cycles corresponding to the singular points in one fixed singular fiber can be chosen to be disjoint .
it is known that the mapping class group @xmath15 can be generated by two elements @xmath22 which are subject to the two relations @xmath23 in fact , @xmath15 can be shown to be isomorphic to @xmath24 by mapping @xmath25 to @xmath26 and @xmath27 to @xmath28 .
since the forgetful map from the mapping class group @xmath29 of the 2torus with one marked point to @xmath15 is an isomorphism , we get that any genus1 lefschetz fibration admits a section .
genus1 lefschetz fibrations were classified by moishezon @xcite , who showed that after a possible perturbation such a fibration over @xmath30 is equivalent to one of the fibrations given by the words @xmath31 ( @xmath32 ) in @xmath15 .
the resulting 4manifold is usually called @xmath33 ( the simply connected elliptic surface with section and of holomorphic euler characteristic @xmath34 ) , and @xmath8 is the famous @xmath7 surface .
it can be shown that a section of @xmath35 has self intersection @xmath36 .
following @xcite we call a fiber with monodromy conjugate to @xmath37 of _ type @xmath38 _ ( @xmath39 ) . when @xmath40 , the corresponding fiber is also called a _
fishtail _ fiber .
it is easy to see that topologically a singular fiber of type @xmath41 ( @xmath42 ) is a plumbing of @xmath43 smooth 2spheres of self
intersection @xmath44 plumbed along a circle ( see @xcite ) , while a fishtail fiber is an immersed 2sphere with one positive double point . since in @xmath16 nonisotopic simple closed curves necessarily intersect each other , it is easy to see that a genus1 lefschetz fibration can have only @xmath41fibers as singular fibers .
the fibration @xmath17 can be perturbed near a singular fiber @xmath45 of type @xmath41 into a fibration @xmath46 which is the same as @xmath17 outside of @xmath45 but breaks @xmath45 into two singular fibers of types @xmath47 and @xmath48 with @xmath49 .
this fact implies that a generic genus1 lefschetz fibration admits only fishtail fibers . in our study
however , we will find it most helpful to understand what kind of other singular fibers an elliptic fibration can admit .
we start with a proposition showing the existence of a particular genus1 fibration on @xmath8 . [
p : mcg ] there exists an elliptic lefschetz fibration on the @xmath7 surface @xmath8 with a section , a singular fiber @xmath45 of type @xmath51 , three singular fibers @xmath52 of type @xmath53 and two further fishtail fibers .
it is not hard to see that the word @xmath54 ( defining a genus1 lefschetz fibration on the @xmath7 surface @xmath8 ) in the mapping class group @xmath15 of the torus is equivalent to @xmath55 ( alternatively , by substituting @xmath25 and @xmath27 with the matrices they correspond to under the map @xmath56 , we can check that the above product is equal to the identity matrix . ) by collecting the powers of @xmath25 in the front using conjugation , we get @xmath57 followed by the product of three squares of some conjugates of @xmath27 and two further conjugates of @xmath27 . since a conjugate of @xmath27 by a word @xmath58 corresponds to the dehn twist along the image under the diffeomorphism @xmath59 of the curve inducing @xmath27 , the proposition follows .
as we already mentioned , genus1 lefschetz fibrations always admit sections .
perturb first the above fibration near the @xmath53 fibers @xmath60 ( @xmath61 ) in a way that these give rise to fishtail fibers @xmath62 with isotopic vanishing cycles .
let us denote the resulting lefschetz fibration by @xmath63 .
let @xmath64 be three twist knots as depicted in @xcite .
let @xmath65 denote the 4manifold we get after performing three knot surgeries with knots @xmath64 along three regular fibers in the fibration on the @xmath7 surface found above .
because of the existence of fishtail fibers in the complement with nonisotopic vanishing cycles , we conclude that @xmath66 .
if we perform the surgeries in the double node neighborhoods near the fishtail fibers @xmath67 , and @xmath68 and @xmath69 respectively , then we can find a pseudo
section @xmath70 as in @xcite which is an immersed sphere of self intersection @xmath71 with three positive double points , intersecting the further fishtail fibers and the @xmath51 fiber @xmath45 transversally .
next smooth the intersections of this pesudo
section @xmath70 with two further fishtail fibers .
the result is an immersed sphere of self intersection 2 having 5 positive double points .
now blow up the 4manifold @xmath65 in the five double points of this sphere , and find an embedded sphere of self
intersection @xmath72 in @xmath73 .
let @xmath74 denote the tubular neighborhood of the linear plumbing of spheres given by this @xmath75sphere together with 14 of the @xmath71spheres in the @xmath51 fiber @xmath45 .
it is not hard to see that @xmath74 is diffeomorphic to @xmath76 in the notation of @xcite , cf .
also @xcite .
it is then easy to show that @xmath77 can be given as the oriented boundary of the rational ball @xmath78 , see @xcite .
define @xmath79 as the rational blow
down of @xmath73 along @xmath74 , that is , @xmath80 notice that @xmath65 is simply connected , and the complement of @xmath74 in @xmath81 is simply connected since the @xmath71sphere in @xmath45 intersecting the last @xmath71sphere of the linear chain @xmath74 provides a hemisphere which contracts the generator of the fundamental group of @xmath82 .
since @xmath83 surjects onto @xmath84 under the natural embedding , van kampen s theorem implies that @xmath79 is simply connected . now simple signature and euler characteristics computation together with freedman s theorem @xcite verifies the result . for short ,
let @xmath85 denote the 4manifold @xmath79 if @xmath86 the @xmath34twist knot @xmath87 .
the following proposition is true in a wider generality , we restrict our attention to the special case @xmath88 in order to keep our discussion as simple as possible . using the results of @xcite the seiberg
witten invariants of @xmath85 can be easily computed .
this computation immediately shows by ( * ? ? ?
* theorem 1.1 ) the seiberg
witten invariant of @xmath93 can be computed to be equal to @xmath94 ( use the facts that the seiberg
witten function of the @xmath7 surface is equal to 1 and the alexander polynomial of @xmath87 is @xmath95 ) .
this result , together with the blow up formula shows that the five fold blow up
@xmath96 has exactly two seiberg
witten basic classes @xmath97 which evaluate on the @xmath75sphere of the configuration @xmath74 as @xmath98 .
moreover , the value of the seiberg witten function on these basic classes is @xmath99 . now
* theorem 8.5 ) implies that @xmath85 has two basic classes , on which the value of the seiberg
witten function is equal to @xmath99 , verifying the result .
the 4manifolds @xmath85 provide an infinite family of smooth 4manifolds all homeomorphic to @xmath0 according to proposition [ p : hom ] , and by corollary [ c : nondiffeo ] these manifolds are pairwise nondiffeomorphic .
therefore the set @xmath100 provides an infinite collection of distinct smooth structures on @xmath0 , hence the proof is complete . using a variation of the above procedure ,
closed 4manifolds with @xmath1 and @xmath2 can be constructed as follows .
consider the fibration @xmath63 found above , containing a singular fiber of type @xmath51 and eight fishtail fibers , out of which three pairs @xmath101 ( @xmath61 ) have isotopic vanishing cycles .
proceed as before by doing three knot surgeries along three regular fibers with twist knots @xmath64 and using the double node neighborhoods provided by the fishtail fibers @xmath102 identify the pseudo
section , which is again an immersed sphere with homological square @xmath44 and has three positive double points . as before , resolve the two positive intersections of this pseudo section with the remaining two fishtail fibers , and find the immersed sphere with 5 double point and homological square 2 .
blow up the 4manifold at the double points of the pesudo
section , and consider the resulting sphere of square @xmath72 in @xmath65 .
this sphere intersects the @xmath51 fiber @xmath45 transversally in a unique point @xmath103 which is on the @xmath71sphere @xmath104 .
now @xmath105 is intersected by two other spheres in @xmath45 , let @xmath106 be one of them and denote the intersection point of @xmath105 and @xmath106 by @xmath107 .
apply 17 infinitely close blow ups at @xmath107 .
the resulting plumbing manifold @xmath108 can be given by the linear plumbing @xmath109 @xmath110 as before , it is routine to see that the boundary @xmath111 can be given as the boundary of the rational ball @xmath112 , hence we can blow it down , resulting the 4manifold @xmath113 . since the normal circle of the pseudo section ( which circle generates the first homology of @xmath111 ) vanishes in the homology of the complement @xmath114 ( as it is shown by a regular fiber ) , the mayer
vietoris sequence implies that @xmath115 vanishes .
simple euler characteristic and signature computations now imply finally , by computing seiberg witten invariants of these manifolds in the fashion it was done in theorem [ t : sw ] , we get that the 4manifolds @xmath116 are pairwise nondiffeomorphic , all with nonvanishing seiberg
witten invariants , verifying the claim of theorem [ t : m2 ] .
|
connected smoothable 4manifolds with @xmath3 odd admit smooth structures exotic structures less clear when euler characteristic small homeomorphic to complex projective plane rational blow down construction knot surgery in double node neighborhoods new smooth 4manifolds discovered with @xmath4 @xmath5 similar ideas irreducible exotic 4manifolds with @xmath1 small @xmath6 study of exotic structures on manifolds with @xmath1 rich history @xmath7 surface @xmath8 example with @xmath9 logarithmic transformations on @xmath8 @xmath10 admits infinitely many smooth structures @xcite later works s normal connected sum operation donaldson theory manifolds @xmath11 @xmath12 admit infinitely many smooth structures @xcite recent results proved same with @xmath13 main result improves bound connected 4manifold @xmath0 admits many smooth structures modifying construction proof of theorem [ t : m1 define 4manifolds @xmath1 euler characteristic smaller unable to show manifolds simply connectedinfinitely many pairwise nondiffeomorphic smooth closed 4manifolds with vanishing first homology @xmath1 @xmath2 nontrivial seiberg witten invariants proof results two steps desribe construct manifolds use seiberg witten theory nondiffeomorphic apply mapping class group arguments theory of lefschetz fibrations knot surgery construction identify configurations curves in 4manifolds rationally blown down desired examples genus1 lefschetz fibration @xmath14 described by word mapping class group @xmath15 2torus @xmath16 monodromy presentation @xmath17 point @xmath18 @xmath19 not singular point fibration gives rise singular fiber @xmath20 monodromy fibration fiber dehn twists along circles vanishing cycles singular points fiber traversing through singular fibers counterclockwise fixed base point @xmath21 word describing fibration assume @xmath17 injective singular points singular fiber more than singular points assumption @xmath17 lefschetz fibration implies vanishing cycles singular points fixed fiber disjointmapping group @xmath15 generated by elements @xmath22 to relations @xmath23 @xmath15 isomorphic to @xmath24 by mapping @xmath25 to @xmath26 @xmath27 to @xmath28 forgetful map @xmath29 2torus point to @xmath15 isomorphism genus1 lefschetz fibration admits section fibrations classified by moishezon fibration over @xmath30 equivalent to @xmath31 ( @xmath32 @xmath15 resulting 4manifold called @xmath33 elliptic surface with section holomorphic euler characteristic @xmath34 @xmath8 @xmath7 surface section of @xmath35 intersection @xmath36 fiber monodromy conjugate to @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 fiber fishtail fiber singular fiber @xmath41 ( @xmath42 plumbing of @xmath43 smooth 2spheres self intersection @xmath44 circle fishtail fiber immersed 2sphere with one positive double point @xmath16 nonisotopic closed curves intersect genus1 lefschetz fibration @xmath41fibers as singular fibersfibration @xmath17 perturbed near fiber @xmath45 into fibration @xmath46 breaks @xmath45 into two fibers @xmath47 and @xmath48 implies genus1 lefschetz fibration admits fishtail fibers understand other singular fibers elliptic fibration proposition genus1 fibration on @xmath8 elliptic lefschetz fibration on @xmath7 surface with section singular fiber @xmath45 three fibers @xmath52 @xmath53 two fishtail fibers word @xmath54 genus1 lefschetz fibration in mapping class group @xmath15 equivalent to @xmath55 substituting @xmath25 and @xmath27 with matrices under map @xmath56 product equal to identity matrix collecting powers of @xmath25 conjugation @xmath57 followed by product three squares of conjugates @xmath27 two conjugates conjugate of @xmath27 by word @xmath58 corresponds to dehn twist along image under diffeomorphism @xmath59 curve @xmath27 proposition follows genus1 lefschetz fibrations admit sectionsperturb fibration near @xmath53 fibers rise fishtail fibers @xmath62 isotopic vanishing cycles denote lefschetz fibration @xmath63 @xmath64 three twist knots @xcite @xmath65 4manifold three knot surgeries @xmath64 fibers fibration @xmath7 surface fishtail fibers nonisotopic vanishing cycles conclude @xmath66 perform surgeries double node neighborhoods near fishtail fibers @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 find pseudo section @xmath70 immersed sphere of self intersection @xmath71 three positive double points intersecting fishtail fibers @xmath51 fiber @xmath45 smooth intersections @xmath70 two fishtail fibers immersed sphere self intersection 5 positive double points blow 4manifold @xmath65 five double points find embedded sphere self intersection @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 tubular neighborhood linear plumbing spheres @xmath75sphere 14 @xmath71spheres in @xmath51 fiber @xmath45 @xmath74 diffeomorphic to @xmath76 @xcite @xmath77 oriented boundary of rational ball @xmath78@xmath79 rational blow down @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath80 @xmath65 connected complement @xmath74 @xmath81 connected @xmath71sphere @xmath45 last @xmath71sphere chain @xmath74 hemisphere contracts generator fundamental group @xmath82 @xmath83 surjects @xmath84 van kampen s theorem implies @xmath79 connected signature euler characteristics computation freedman s theorem @xcite verifies result @xmath85 denote 4manifold @xmath79 @xmath86 @xmath34twist knot @xmath87 restrict attention special case @xmath88 results @xcite seiberg witten invariants @xmath85 computed theorem 1.1 seiberg witten invariant @xmath93 equal @xmath94 seiberg witten function @xmath7 surface equal 1 alexander polynomial @xmath87 @xmath95 blow up formula five fold blow up @xmath96 two seiberg witten basic classes @xmath97 evaluate @xmath75sphere @xmath74 @xmath98 value seiberg witten function basic classes @xmath99 theorem 8.5 implies @xmath85 two basic classes seiberg witten function equal @xmath99 result4manifolds @xmath85 provide infinite smooth homeomorphic to @xmath0 pairwise nondiffeomorphic set @xmath100 provides infinite smooth structures on @xmath0 proof complete closed 4manifolds with @xmath1 @xmath2 constructed fibration @xmath63 singular fiber @xmath51 eight fishtail fibers three pairs @xmath101 have isotopic vanishing cycles three knot surgeries along regular fibers twist knots @xmath64 double node neighborhoods fishtail fibers @xmath102 pseudo section immersed sphere with homological square @xmath44 three positive double points resolve two intersections with fishtail fibers find immersed sphere with 5 double point homological square 2 blow 4manifold at double points resulting sphere square @xmath72 @xmath65 intersects @xmath51 fiber @xmath45 in unique point @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath105 intersected by two spheres @xmath45 @xmath106 intersection point @xmath107 apply 17 close blow ups at @xmath107plumbing manifold @xmath108 given by linear plumbing @xmath109 boundary @xmath111 boundary rational ball @xmath112 blow down 4manifold @xmath113 normal circle of pseudo section first homology @xmath111 vanishes in homology complement @xmath114 mayer vietoris sequence implies @xmath115 vanishes euler characteristic signature computations imply computing seiberg witten invariants manifolds theorem 4manifolds @xmath116 pairwise nondiffeomorphic with nonvanishing seiberg witten invariants verifying claim theorem [ t : m2 ]
| 0.504885
| 3,262
| 1,782
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,892
|
we provide a synopsis of an effective approach to the problem of time in the semiclassical regime .
the essential features of this new approach to evaluating relational quantum dynamics in constrained systems are illustrated by means of a simple toy model .
|
the application of the dirac quantization programme to generally covariant systems triggers a ` conceptual problem ' since the quantization of the hamiltonian constraint yields a seemingly ` timeless ' evolution equation @xmath0 and thereby leads to the issue of ` frozen dynamics ' in the quantum theory .
while classically the presence of a hamiltonian constraint does not lead to an impeding obstacle because we can always resort to a time coordinate along the flow of the hamiltonian with respect to which one can order physical relations , such a time coordinate is absent in the physical hilbert space . the standard ` conceptual solution ' to this problem
is _ relational dynamics _
@xcite , according to which time evolution arises by relating dynamical quantities to other internal variables which we use as clocks to keep track of internal time ; such relational statements are invariant under the gauge flow of the hamiltonian constraint and could thus , in principle , be promoted into well defined operators on the physical hilbert space . nevertheless , even when adopting this ` conceptual solution ' one encounters a whole plethora of _ technical _ problems in the quantum theory @xcite . here
we want to address four such problems : 1 .
the _ hilbert space problem_. which hilbert space representation is one to use and , in particular , how is one to construct a positive - definite inner product on the space of solutions ? 2 .
the _ multiple choice problem_. which relational clock variable should one employ ? ( different relational clocks may yield _ a priori _ different quantum theories . )
the _ global time problem_. good global clocks which parametrize the gauge orbits such that every trajectory intersects every constant clock time slice once and only once may not exist .
the _ observable problem_. it is a notoriously difficult challenge to construct explicit observables in generally covariant theories , especially in the quantum theory . in the sequel we summarise the effective approach to the problem of time @xcite which at least in the semiclassical regime
deals with some of these problems and circumvents others . rather than employing special clock choices and attempting to justify these , we follow the basic premise that there are to be no distinguished clocks and that , instead , we ought to treat all clocks on an equal footing .
our goal consists in employing local internal times , possibly translating between different clocks and thereby evolving ( relational ) data along complete semiclassical trajectories .
the central idea of the effective approach is to sidestep the _
hilbert space problem _ altogether ; instead of employing wave functions or density matrices to describe states in a fixed hilbert space , we regard states as ( _ a priori _ complex ) linear functionals on an algebra of kinematical variables , say polynomials in a canonial pair @xmath1 , and use expectation values @xmath2 and @xmath3 , and moments . ] @xmath4 to parametrize states @xcite .
this construction immediately carries over to an arbitrary number of canonical pairs .
this space of states can be given a ( quantum ) phase space structure via a poisson bracket defined as follows for any operators @xmath5 polynomial in the canonical variables [ poisson ] \{,}:= .
this definition can be extended to the moments by linearity and the leibnitz rule and yields ` classical poisson brackets ' for the expectation values of basic canonical variables , i.e. @xmath6 , vanishing poisson brackets between expectation values and moments @xmath7 and more complicated brackets between the moments @xcite . in this summary
we focus on finite dimensional systems with a single constraint @xmath8 playing the role of the hamiltonian constraint of general relativity .
the dirac programme requires physical states to satisfy @xmath9 .
the spectrum of @xmath8 is essential for the construction of the physical hilbert space : if zero lies in the discrete part of the spectrum , the physical hilbert space turns out to be a subspace of the kinematical hilbert space , while a new hilbert space with a new ( positive definite ) inner product must be constructed for solutions if zero lies in the continuous part of the spectrum . there
exist techniques for constructing such physical hilbert spaces in the latter case @xcite , however , finding physical hilbert spaces in practice remains a difficult task .
the effective techniques , on the other hand , work for both zero in the discrete or continuous part of the spectrum . at the effective level , physical states
must clearly satisfy [ qcon ] ( , , ( qp),)=0 , however , this is not sufficient since the expectation value of @xmath8 may be zero even if @xmath10 . furthermore , when solving one ( first class ) constraint classically we can eliminate an entire canonical pair , while on the quantum phase space after solving ( [ qcon ] ) and factoring out its flow we would be left with an infinite tower of ( unconstrained ) moments of the eliminated canonical pair .
clearly , we must impose a further set of constraints to account for this .
it turns out that [ pol ] c_pol:= = 0 , where @xmath11 stands for all polynomials in the basic canonical operators , provides a correct independent set of constraint functions on quantum phase space which together with ( [ qcon ] ) is then equivalent to the dirac condition @xcite . as a result
, we have infinitely many constraints for infinitely many variables . in order to reduce the system to a tractable finite size
, we impose a very general semiclassical approximation : assume @xmath12 and truncate the system at @xmath13 by neglecting all terms of higher order .
this is consistent with the quantum poisson bracket structure ( [ poisson ] ) which preserves orders in @xmath13 and generates the flows and dynamics on quantum phase space , once suitable initial data for the relevant expectation values and moments has been chosen . rather than defining a quantum theory
, the effective approach in its present form provides an effective tool for evaluating the quantum dynamics of given ( finite dimensional ) systems .
let us outline the effective approach to semiclassical relational dynamics with an explicit toy model ( for a more general discussion and details see @xcite ) .
the model we are considering is the isotropic 2d harmonic oscillator with prescribed total energy , whose classical solutions are closed orbits in phase space such that no global clock exists @xcite .
it is subject to the constraint [ quant - rov ] could construct clock functions are the @xmath14 . in order to obtain a notion of evolution from this _ a priori _ timeless system , we may choose a variable as a local clock , say @xmath15 , and deparametrize locally at the classical level by factorizing the constraint c=(p_1+h(q_1))(p_1-h(q_1 ) ) , h(q_1)=. quantization of the first factor ( in the region where it vanishes ) yields a local schrdinger regime [ schrod ] i(q_1,q_2)=(_2,_2 ; q_1)(q_1,q_2)=(q_1,q_2 ) with a non self adjoint @xmath16 ( defined by spectral decomposition ) due to non unitarity in @xmath15 evolution ( @xmath15 is not globally valid ) . given this construction , we can calculate expectation values and moments in @xmath15 time and compare their evolution to the effective treatment . at the effective level ,
on the other hand , we retain 14 kinematical degrees of freedom at order @xmath13 , namely four expectation values @xmath17 , four spreads @xmath18 , and six covariances @xmath19 , where the @xmath20 are any of the @xmath14 . at order @xmath13
the constraint ( [ quant - rov ] ) translates via ( [ qcon ] ) and ( [ pol])into the following five first class quantum constraint functions @xcite [ effrov ] c&= & p_1 ^ 2+p_2 ^ 2+q_1 ^ 2+q_2
^ 2+(p_1)^2+(p_2)^2+(q_1)^2+(q_2)^2-m= 0 + c_q_1&= & 2p_1(q_1p_1)+2p_2(q_1p_2)+2q_1(q_1)^2 + 2q_2(q_1q_2)+ip_1= 0 + c_p_1&= & 2p_1(p_1)^2 + 2p_2(p_1p_2)+2q_1(p_1q_1)+2q_2(p_1q_2)-iq_1= 0 + c_q_2&=&2p_1(p_1q_2)+ 2p_2 ( q_2p_2)+2q_1(q_1q_2)+2q_2(q_2)^2+ip_2 = 0 + c_p_2&=&2p_1(p_1p_2)+ 2p_2(p_2)^2 + 2q_1(q_1p_2)+2q_2(q_2p_2)-iq_2 = 0.these five constraints generate only four independent flows since at order @xmath13 we have to deal with a degenerate poisson structure @xcite .
it is convenient to fix three of these independent flows . selecting @xmath15 as a relational clock
it should not be represented as an operator ; we therefore choose a gauge which ` projects this clock to a parameter ' by setting its fluctuations to zero ( fixing three @xmath21 flows and leaving us with one ` hamiltonian flow ' ) [ zeitgeist ] ( q_1)^2=(q_1q_2)=(q_1p_2)=0 . indeed , the choice of an internal time variable in the effective framework is best described and interpreted in a corresponding gauge @xcite : we refer to such a choice and gauge ( e.g. ( [ zeitgeist ] ) ) as a _
zeitgeist_. after choosing a local relational clock and corresponding zeitgeist , local relational observables at the effective level are given by correlations of expectation values and moments with the expectation value of the chosen clock ( here @xmath22 ) evaluated in its zeitgeist .
we call such state dependent local observables _
fashionables _ because they comprise the complete physical information about the system ( at order @xmath13 ) as long as the zeitgeist is valid , but may fall out of fashion when a zeitgeist necessarily changes at turning points of local clocks .
it turns out that the fashionables in @xmath15 time of the effective framework agree perfectly with those computed in the @xmath15 schrdinger regime ( [ schrod ] ) @xcite . in its turning region
, @xmath15 becomes complex valued and its zeitgeist incompatible with the semiclassical expansion , such that evolution in @xmath15 breaks down _ before _ the turning point a signature of non unitarity .
thus , a new local internal time ( here @xmath23 ) is needed and for a full evolution we must switch between @xmath15 and @xmath23 time . furthermore ,
since a given internal time is best described in a corresponding choice of gauge , we must switch also between the @xmath15 and @xmath23 zeitgeister .
explicit gauge transformations between these zeitgeister can , indeed , be constructed and initial data can be evolved consistently around the entire closed semiclassical orbit through the turning points of various clock variables @xcite .
it should be emphasized that in each gauge we evolve a _
different _ set of fashionables which highlights the local nature of the relational concept in the absence of global clock functions .
the effective approach summarised here sidesteps the technical problems mentioned in the introduction .
in particular , the _ hilbert space problem _ is avoided altogether since no use of any hilbert space representation has been made . at the effective level
one can make sense of local time evolution and switching between different local clocks can essentially be achieved by an additional gauge transformation which enables one to handle the _
multiple choice _ and _ global time problem _ and implies the equivalence of different clock choices at semiclassical order .
note , however , that if the relational clock is non global , it assumes complex values in its turning region @xcite .
state dependent fashionables arise naturally in this framework which simplifies the _ observable problem _ due to the classical treatment of the effective system . in the example outlined here and other models
, the effective evolution agrees with local deparametrizations at a hilbert space level @xcite .
finally , the notion of relational evolution disappears in highly quantum states of systems without global clocks @xcite .
the application of this effective framework to the more interesting closed frw model with a massive scalar field will appear elsewhere @xcite .
* acknowledgments * the author would like to thank martin bojowald and artur tsobanjan for collaboration on this subject .
9 slides at http://loops11.iem.csic.es/loops11/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=101 c. rovelli , _ quantum gravity _ ( cup , cambridge , 2004 ) ; c. rovelli , phys . rev .
* d 42 * 2638 ( 1990 ) , phys .
rev . * d 43 * 442 ( 1991 ) ; b. dittrich , gen .
grav . * 39 * 1891 ( 2007 ) , class .
grav . * 23 * 6155 ( 2006 ) k. v. kucha , in _ proc .
4th canadian conference on general relativity and relativistic astrophysics _ , edited by g. kunstatter , d. vincent and j. williams ( world scientific , singapore , 1992 ) ; c. j. isham , in _ integrable systems , quantum groups , and quantum field theories _ ( kluwer academic publishers , london , 1993 ) ; e. anderson ( _ preprint _
arxiv:1009.2157 [ gr - qc ] ) ; j. tambornino ( _ preprint _ arxiv:1109.0740 [ gr - qc ] ) m. bojowald , p. a. hhn and a. tsobanjan , class .
quantum grav .
* 28 * 035006 ( 2011 ) m. bojowald , p. a. hhn and a. tsobanjan , phys .
* d 83 * 125023 ( 2011 ) m. bojowald and a. skirzewski , rev .
phys . * 18 * 713745 ( 2006 )
|
application dirac quantization programme to covariant systems triggers conceptual problem quantization hamiltonian constraint yields timeless evolution equation leads to frozen dynamics ' in quantum theory hamiltonian constraint impeding obstacle can resort to time coordinate along flow order physical relations time coordinate absent in physical hilbert space standard conceptual solution is _ relational dynamics _ @xcite time evolution arises by relating dynamical quantities to internal variables as clocks relational statements invariant under gauge flow hamiltonian constraint could be promoted into defined operators on physical hilbert space adopting this conceptual solution encounters technical problems in quantum theory address four problems hilbert space problem_ which hilbert space representation construct positive - definite inner product ? multiple choice problem_ which relational clock variable ? different relational clocks yield different quantum theories global time problem good global clocks gauge orbits clock time slice may not exist _ observable problem_ difficult challenge to construct explicit observables in covariant theories especially quantum theory sequel effective approach to problem of time @xcite deals with some problems circumvents othersspecial clock choices follow premise no distinguished clocks treat all clocks equal goal local times translating between clocks evolving relational data along semiclassical trajectories sidestep hilbert space problem instead wave functions density matrices regard states as complex linear functionals on algebra of kinematical variables polynomials in canonial pair use expectation values @xmath2 @xmath3 moments to parametrize states construction carries to arbitrary number of canonical pairs space of states quantum phase space structure via poisson bracket defined for @xmath5 polynomial variables definition extended to moments by linearity leibnitz rule yields classical poisson brackets for expectation values of variables vanishing poisson brackets between expectation values moments complicated brackets between moments focus on finite dimensional systems with single constraint @xmath8 hamiltonian constraint of general relativity dirac programme requires physical states to satisfy @xmath9 spectrum @xmath8 essential for construction physical hilbert space if zero in discrete part physical hilbert space subspace of kinematical hilbert space new hilbert space inner product constructed for if zero in continuous part techniques for constructing physical hilbert spaces in @xcite difficult effective techniques work for both zero in discrete or continuous physical states must satisfy [ qcon ] ( , qp),)=0 not sufficient expectation value of @xmath8 may be zero even if @xmath10 solving one constraint can eliminate entire canonical pair quantum phase space infinite unconstrained moments of eliminated canonical pair must impose further constraints to [ pol ] c_pol:= = 0 @xmath11 for all polynomials operators provides constraint functions on quantum phase space with ( [ qcon ] ) equivalent to dirac condition @xcite infinitely many constraints for infinitely many variables to reduce system to finite size semiclassical approximation assume @xmath12 truncate system at @xmath13 neglecting terms higher orderconsistent with quantum poisson bracket structure preserves orders in @xmath13 generates flows dynamics on quantum phase space suitable initial data for expectation values moments chosen effective approach provides tool evaluating quantum dynamics of finite dimensional systems outline approach to semiclassical relational dynamics with toy model model isotropic 2d harmonic oscillator with prescribed total energy closed orbits in phase space no global clock exists subject to constraint clock functions @xmath14 evolution system choose variable as local clock @xmath15 deparametrize locally level by factorizing constraint c=(p_1+h(q_1))(p_1-h(q_1 h(q_1)= quantization of first factor yields local schrdinger regime i(q_1,q_2)=(_2, ; q_1)(q_1=(q_1 non self adjoint @xmath16 due to non unitarity in @xmath15 evolution not globally valid calculate expectation values moments in @xmath15 time compare evolution to effective treatmenteffective level retain 14 kinematical degrees freedom @xmath13 four expectation values @xmath17 four spreads six covariances @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath14 @xmath13 constraint quant - rov translates qcon pol five class quantum constraint functions @xcite p_1+p_2+q_1_2(p_1)^2+_2)^2+(q_1)^2+(q_2)^2-m_q_1 2p_1(q_1p_1)+2p_2_2)+2q_1(q_1^2 2q_2+ip_1_p_1 2p_1(p_1 2p_2_2)+2q_1)+2q_2-iq_1 0_2 2p_2_2)+2q_1_2(q_2)^2+ip_2 0 2p_2(p_2) 2q_1(q_1p_2)+2q_2(q_2p_2)-iq_2 = 0 five constraints generate four independent flows @xmath13 degenerate poisson structure fix three independent flows@xmath15 relational clock not operator choose gauge projects clock to parameter setting fluctuations to zero fixing three @xmath21 flows one hamiltonian flow zeitgeist ] ( q_1)^2=(q_1q_2)=(q_1p_2)=0 choice internal time variable framework described in corresponding gauge @xcite refer choice gauge zeitgeist _ zeitgeist_ choosing local relational clock zeitgeist local relational observables given correlations expectation values moments with chosen clock @xmath22 ) state dependent local observables fashionables complete physical information system @xmath13 zeitgeist valid may fall out of fashion when zeitgeist changes at turning points clocks fashionables in @xmath15 time agree with @xmath15 schrdinger regime @xcite turning region @xmath15 becomes complex zeitgeist incompatible with semiclassical expansion evolution in @xmath15 breaks down new local internal time @xmath23 ) needed full evolution switch between @xmath15 and @xmath23 time given internal time described in corresponding choice gauge switch between @xmath15 and @xmath23 zeitgeistergauge transformations between zeitgeister constructed initial data evolved around closed semiclassical orbit through turning points clock variables in each gauge different fashionables highlights local nature of relational concept global clock functions effective approach sidesteps technical problems hilbert space problem avoided hilbert space representation effective level local time evolution switching between local clocks achieved by additional gauge transformation multiple choice global time problem equivalence of clock choices at semiclassical order if relational clock non global assumes complex values in turning region state dependent fashionables arise simplifies observable problem effective evolution agrees with local deparametrizations at hilbert space level relational evolution disappears in quantum states without global clocks application of framework to closed frw model with massive scalar field martin bojowald artur tsobanjan for collaboration 9 slides at http://loops11.iem.csic.es=article&id=101 c. rovelli , _ quantum gravity _ ( cambridge 2004 ) ; rovelli , phys . rev . * d 42 * 2638 ( 1990 ) rev d 43 * 442 ( 1991 ) bdittrich gen. grav 39 * 1891 2007 class grav 23 * 6155 2006 ) kucha 4th canadian conference general relativity relativistic astrophysics edited kunstatter d vincent j williams world scientific 1992 j isham integrable systems quantum groups quantum field theories kluwer academic publishers london 1993 anderson preprint arxiv:1009.2157 j tambornino arxiv:1109.0740 bojowald hhn tsobanjan quantum grav . 28 * 035006 ( 2011 bojowald phys . 83 * 125023 ( 2011 skirzewski rev . 18 * 713745 ( 2006
| 0.506344
| 3,156
| 1,597
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,894
|
spin models of neural networks and genetic networks are considered elegant as they are accessible to statistical mechanics tools for spin glasses and magnetic systems .
however , the conventional choice of variables in spin systems may cause problems in some models when parameter choices are unrealistic from the biological perspective . obviously , this may limit the role of a model as a template model for biological systems . perhaps less obviously , also ensembles of random networks are affected and may exhibit different critical properties .
we here consider a prototypical network model that is biologically plausible in its local mechanisms .
we study a discrete dynamical network with two characteristic properties : nodes with binary states 0 and 1 , and a modified threshold function with @xmath0 .
we explore the critical properties of random networks of such nodes and find a critical connectivity @xmath1 with activity vanishing at the critical point .
we currently experience a revived interest in dynamical networks of nodes with binary states , driven by two active fields of research : modeling of molecular information processing networks ( as , e.g. , genetic networks or protein networks ) @xcite , as well as modeling of adaptive networks @xcite . these network models with binary states
are reminiscent of artificial neural networks as studied in the statistical mechanics community about two decades ago .
an early motivation of networks with binary node states @xmath2 was given by mcculloch and pitts in 1943 @xcite as a model for neural information processing . a model for associative memory constructed from such nodes by hopfield in 1982
@xcite attracted considerable interest among physicists as it is conveniently accessible to equilibrium statistical mechanics methods @xcite . a simple redefinition of weights and thresholds maps the model onto the mathematical representation of a spin glass with states @xmath3 , which has become the usual form of the hopfield model in the physics literature .
the corresponding redefinition of weights and thresholds does not affect the functioning of the model , as its mechanism of an associative memory works on the redefined weights as well . in some circumstances
, however , when faithful representation of certain biological details is important , the exact definition matters . in the spin version of a neural network model , for example
, a node with negative spin state @xmath4 will transmit non - zero signals through its outgoing weights @xmath5 , despite representing an inactive ( ! ) biological node . in the model ,
such signals arrive at target nodes @xmath6 , e.g. , as a sum of incoming signals @xmath7 .
however , biological nodes , as genes or neurons , usually do not transmit signals when inactive . in biochemical network models
each node represents whether a specific chemical component is present @xmath8 or absent @xmath9 .
thus the network itself is mostly in a state of being partially absent as , e.g. , in a protein network where for every absent protein all of its outgoing links are absent as well @xcite . in the spin state convention , this fact is not faithfully represented .
another example for an inaccurate detail is the common practice to use the standard convention of the heaviside step function as an activation function in discrete dynamical networks ( or the sign function in the spin model context ) .
the convention @xmath10 is not a careful representation of biological circumstances .
both , for genes and neurons , a silent input frequently maps to a silent output .
therefore , we use a redefined threshold function defined as @xmath11 when studying statistical properties of ensembles of threshold networks with random links , these details have a considerable influence on the network s dynamics and critical properties . when simulating ensembles via networks of spins @xmath3 , care should be taken to properly renormalize weights and activation thresholds to ensure faithful implementation of the original model with states @xmath2 . however , this is frequently omitted , resulting in the statistics of a system of limited biological plausibility @xcite .
another example where normalization and the definition of the nodes thresholds matters are adaptive networks , currently discussed in the context of neural networks @xcite .
when defining local adaptive mechanisms , it is particularly important to base it on biologically plausible definitions of nodes and circuits .
while these mechanisms work also for spin type networks @xcite , such an implementation is not realizable in a biological context , as it would require signals over links which are in fact silent , due to the inactivity of their source nodes .
an adaptive algorithm based on such correlations of non - activity is therefore not plausible . in this paper , we first define a binary threshold network that does not include explicitly forbidden states in the context of biological examples .
then we study its critical properties which we find to be distinctly different from those of random boolean networks @xcite and random threshold networks @xcite .
in particular , activity of the network now influences criticality in a non - trivial way , as recently observed for random threshold networks with bistable nodes @xcite .
let us consider randomly wired threshold networks of @xmath12 nodes @xmath13 .
at each discrete time step , all nodes are updated in parallel according to @xmath14 using the input function @xmath15 in particular we choose @xmath16 for plausibility reasons ( zero input signal will produce zero output ) .
while the weights take discrete values @xmath17 with equal probability for connected nodes , we select the thresholds @xmath18 for the following discussion . for any node @xmath6 , the number of incoming links @xmath19 is called the in - degree @xmath20 of that specific node .
@xmath21 denotes the average connectivity of the whole network . with randomly placed links ,
the probability for each node to actually have @xmath22 incoming links follows a poissonian distribution : @xmath23 to analytically derive the critical connectivity of this type of network model , we first study damage spreading on a local basis and calculate the probability @xmath24 for a single node to propagate a small perturbation , i.e. to change its output from 0 to 1 or vice versa after changing a single input state .
the calculation can be done closely following the derivation for spin - type threshold networks in ref .
@xcite , but one has to account for the possible occurrence of ` 0 ' input signals also via non - zero links .
the combinatorial approach yields a result that directly corresponds to the spin - type network calculation via @xmath25 .
however , this approach does not hold true for our boolean model in combination with the defined theta function @xmath16 as it assumes a statistically equal distribution of all possible input configurations for a single node . in the boolean model
, this would involve an average node activity of @xmath26 over the whole network .
instead we find ( fig .
[ fig : activity ] ) that the average activity on the network is significantly below @xmath27 . at @xmath28 ( which will turn out to be already far in the supercritical regime ) ,
less than 30 percent of all nodes are active on average . around @xmath29 ( where we usually expect the critical connectivity for such networks ) ,
the average activity is in fact below 10 percent .
thus , random input configurations will more likely consist of a higher number of ` 0 ' signal contributions than of @xmath30 inputs . therefore , when counting input configurations for the combinatorial derivation of @xmath24 , we need to weight all relevant configurations according to their realization probability as given by the average activity @xmath31 .
for the first @xmath32 this yields @xmath33 which generalizes to @xmath34 using @xmath35 and @xmath36 . as the in - degree
@xmath37 is not equal for all nodes , the expectation value of @xmath38 is essential to determine the critical connectivity of the whole network .
this will yield the average probability for damage spreading for a certain average connectivity @xmath21 .
consider a network of size @xmath39 .
for large @xmath12 , the problem studied in the above section is equivalent to connecting a new node @xmath40 with state @xmath41 to an arbitrary node @xmath6 , increasing @xmath20 to @xmath42 .
if now @xmath41 is changed , this will result in a state change of node @xmath6 with a probability @xmath43 .
as mentioned above , the link distribution follows a poissonian ; thus we can calculate the expectation value @xmath44 for the thermodynamical limit @xmath45 as @xmath46 which can be computed numerically using @xmath24 as given in eq .
( [ eq : ps_k ] ) . the actual calculation of the critical connectivity @xmath47 for the network model presented above is now done by applying the annealed approximation as introduced by derrida and pomeau @xcite .
the application of this method on threshold networks is discussed in detail in @xcite , which can be directly transferred on the network model discussed in the present work .
the critical connectivity can thus be obtained by solving @xmath48 however , @xmath47 now depends on the average network activity , which in turn is a function of the average connectivity @xmath21 itself as shown in fig . [ fig : activity ] . from the combined plot in fig .
[ fig : activityvskc ] we find that both curves intersect at a point where the network dynamics due to the current connectivity @xmath49 exhibit an average activity which in turn yields a critical connectivity @xmath47 that exactly matches the given connectivity .
this intersection thus corresponds to the critical connectivity of the present network model .
however , the average activity still varies with different network sizes , which is obvious from figure [ fig : activityvskc ] .
therefore , also the critical connectivity is a function of @xmath12 .
table [ tab : kc_sizes ] lists results for different values of @xmath12 .
.critical connectivity @xmath47 for different sizes as determined from curve intersections in figure [ fig : activityvskc ] .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] for an analytic approach to the infinite size limit , we can now calculate the probability for a node at given in - degree @xmath37 and average network activity @xmath50 at time @xmath51 to exhibit output state 1 .
this probability equals the average activity for the next time step @xmath52 . by examining all relevant input configurations
, we find that for given constant @xmath37 this generalizes to @xmath53 again , we have to account for the poissonian distribution of links in our network model , so the average evolution of network activity is obtained by @xmath54 it is now possible to distinguish between the different dynamical regimes by solving @xmath55 for the critical line . the solid line in figure [ fig : activityvskc ]
depicts the evolved activity in the long time limit .
we find that for infinite system size , the critical connectivity is at @xmath56 while up to this value all network activity vanishes in the long time limit ( @xmath57 ) .
for any average connectivity @xmath58 , a certain fraction of nodes remains active . in finite size systems , both network activity evolution and damage propagation probabilities are subject to finite size effects , thus increasing @xmath47 to a higher value . as a numerical verification
, we can also derive the critical connectivity for infinite system size @xmath59 using finite size scaling of the above simulation results ( table [ tab : kc_sizes ] ) .
the optimum fit is shown in figure [ fig : kc - scaling ] and yields @xmath60 which perfectly supports the analytical calculation .
the same consideration is also possible to obtain the average activity @xmath61 for increasing network size .
this can be done both at constant values of @xmath49 as well as along the critical line in figure [ fig : activityvskc ] using the values of @xmath62 from table [ tab : kc_sizes ] . for the critical line ,
we indeed find vanishing network activity ( inset of figure [ fig : kc - scaling ] ) : @xmath63 this does also hold true for any connectivity below the critical line . for supercritical networks at @xmath64 ,
the numerical simulation yields a non - zero fraction of nodes which remains active on average in good agreement with the analytic computation ( see squares in figure [ fig : activityvskc ] ) . in additional numerical simulations using the standard step function
, we obtain a critical connectivity of @xmath65 , which is analytically supported by a combinatorial calculation following ref .
@xcite where we find @xmath25 .
the networks exhibit significantly higher average activity , while most of the active nodes are frozen in the active state . on a side note , if we chose to calculate the critical connectivity based on an assumed average activity of @xmath27 , the activity - dependent calculation via ( [ eq : ps_k ] ) and ( [ eq : k_ccalculation ] ) would effectively reproduce the same result ( @xmath65 ) as the original combinatiorial approach from @xcite would yield for the new boolean model . as the assumption does not hold true here , this result can only be viewed as an additional plausibility check for the correspondence between both approaches . in passing we
note that also for the spin type threshold network studied in @xcite we find activity levels different from @xmath27 , such that conditions for a valid combinatorial approach might not be met in that case , as well .
finally , let us have a closer look on the average length of attractor cycles and transients . as shown in fig .
[ fig : attractors ] , the behavior is strongly dependent of the dynamical regime of the network .
as expected and in accordance with early works on random threshold networks @xcite as well as random boolean networks @xcite , we find an exponential increase of the average attractor lengths with network size @xmath12 in the chaotic regime ( @xmath66 ) , whereas we can observe a sub - linear increase in the frozen phase ( @xmath67 ) .
we find similar behavior for the scaling of transient lengths ( inset of figure [ fig : attractors ] ) .
in summary we studied threshold networks with boolean node states that are biologically more plausible than current boolean and threshold networks and which are simpler than the recently introduced networks with bistable threshold nodes @xcite .
a major observation is that activity of the nodes depends on connectivity which also renders critical properties of the networks activity - dependent , as found earlier for random threshold networks with bistable nodes @xcite .
we extend the annealed approximation to correct for these effects and find connectivity @xmath1 and vanishing activity at the critical point in the thermodynamic limit .
going beyond the statistics of random network ensembles , also real biological circuits can be implemented with great ease using the threshold networks defined here .
we successfully reproduced the dynamical trajectory of the budding yeast cell cycle network as implemented with bistable threshold functions in @xcite , as well as for the corresponding network in fission yeast @xcite . to conclude ,
let us remind ourselves of the original idea of using random boolean networks for characterizing typical properties of biological networks @xcite . in 1969 , using random boolean networks as a null model for genetic networks was a logical approach , given our complete ignorance of the circuitry of genetic networks at that time .
thus the best guess was to treat all possible boolean rules as equally probable . today
, however , we have much more details knowledge about certain properties of genetic networks and , therefore , about more realistic ensembles of random networks .
a biologically motivated and carefully defined threshold network , as attempted in this paper , may provide a more suited null model for the particular properties of biological networks than random boolean networks with equally distributed boolean functions .
|
m. rybarsch would like to thank the studienstiftung des deutschen volkes for financial support of this work .
|
rybarsch thank studienstiftung deutschen volkes financial support
| 0.065443
| 26
| 14
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,895
|
by measuring the josephson plasma resonance , we have probed the influence of an in - plane magnetic field on the pancake vortex correlations along the @xmath0-axis in heavily underdoped bi@xmath1sr@xmath1cacu@xmath1o@xmath2 ( @xmath3 k ) single crystals both in the vortex liquid and in the vortex solid phase .
whereas the in - plane field enhances the interlayer phase coherence in the liquid state close to the melting line , it slightly depresses it in the solid state .
this is interpreted as the result of an attractive force between pancake vortices and josephson vortices , apparently also present in the vortex liquid state .
the results unveil a boundary between a correlated vortex liquid in which pancakes adapt to josephson vortices , and the usual homogeneous liquid .
josephson plasma resonance , bi:2212 , josephson vortex 74.25.qt , 74.50.+r
|
in highly anisotropic layered superconductors , tilting a magnetic field at a direction oblique to the cuo@xmath1 planes leads to novel states of vortex matter .
bitter decoration@xcite , hall probe microscopy and lorentz microscopy have confirmed that the attraction between josephson vortex ( jv ) stacks and pancake vortices ( pv ) in the vortex solid state of bi@xmath1sr@xmath1cacu@xmath1o@xmath2 leads to the so - called crossing - lattice@xcite .
this state is only one of many constituting a particularly rich phase diagram .
the occurence of other structural phases of vortex matter , _
e.g. _ , the lattice of tilted pv stacks , the combined perpendicular and tilted pv stacks@xcite , or the pv - soliton lattice , depends on the interplay between the magnetic and josephson coupling contributions to the pv lattice tilt modulus @xcite .
the josephson plasma resonance ( jpr ) frequency @xmath4 is sensitive to the superconducting phase difference , @xmath5 , between cuo@xmath1 layers @xmath6 , through @xmath7 where @xmath8 stands for thermal and disorder average .
since @xmath5 intimately depends on the alignment of pv stacks , jpr can in principle be used to detect and identify different vortex phases .
the bi@xmath1sr@xmath1cacu@xmath1o@xmath2 single crystals ( @xmath3 k ) were cut from a larger underdoped bi@xmath1sr@xmath1cacu@xmath1o@xmath2 crystal , grown by the travelling solvent floating zone technique .
the jpr was measured using the cavity perturbation technique in the tm@xmath9 modes , with the microwave electrical field aligned along the sample @xmath0-axis .
two orthogonal coils were used to apply field components parallel ( @xmath10 ) and perpendicular ( @xmath11 ) to the cuo@xmath1 layers .
varying the mode @xmath12 , allowed us to change the jpr frequency and to probe both the vortex solid and the liquid state .
magnetic - field dependance of the microwave absorption ( arbitrary units ) of a bi@xmath1sr@xmath1cacu@xmath1o@xmath2 single crystal obtained at different frequencies . ] figure [ fig : dissipation ] shows the microwave absorption obtained by sweeping @xmath11 at constant @xmath10 and temperature .
when @xmath13 , the jpr is identified as the maximum of the microwave absorption , for the field @xmath14 ( arrows in figure [ fig : dissipation ] ) . following the evolution of the absorption ,
the lineshape is modified by @xmath10 in two ways .
first , the intensity of the microwave response decreases for all frequencies .
it has been pointed out that the presence of a josephson vortex lattice ( jvl ) strongly modulates the _ c_-axis critical current@xcite .
thus , the jpr can not develop in the stacks of jvs .
however , for low values of the in - plane field ( @xmath15 , where @xmath16 is the anisotropy ratio and @xmath17 the interlayer distance ) , the distance between two stacks of jvs is sufficiently high so that the phase remains unaffected far from the cores .
the remaining microwave absorption mainly arises from jv - free regions , the extent of which decreases linearly with @xmath10 .
second , @xmath10 changes the field @xmath14 at which the maximum absorption occurs : the decrease of @xmath14 observed in the vortex solid at 31.2 and 39.4 ghz implies the decrease of @xmath18 and is consistent with the addition of a jvl .
however , for 19.2 and 22.9 ghz , @xmath14 , measured in the vortex liquid , _
increases_. the @xmath14-loci for different temperatures are shown in fig .
[ fig : result ] together with the pv vortex lattice melting line in @xmath13 .
the increase of @xmath14 is only observed in the vortex liquid state and for sufficiently low pv densities . in the solid phase ,
it has been shown@xcite that the addition of pvs on a dense lattice of jvs ( @xmath19 ) increases the @xmath0-axis critical current : the pvs adjust their positions to the jvl so as to maximize @xmath18@xcite .
the same effect could be present in the vortex liquid phase , giving rise to an effective attraction between pvs and jvs and to a _ correlated vortex liquid _ in which the density of pvs is smaller in jv - free regions .
since the microwave absorption due to the jpr mainly comes from those regions , increasing @xmath10 also increases @xmath14 .
however , even though the presence of well - defined josephson vortices in the presence of a pv liquid is still controversial , we believe that it can be the case for low densities of pvs .
the correlated vortex liquid is therefore stable close to the pv melting line , for low values of the perpendicular magnetic field .
|
anisotropic layered superconductors tilting magnetic field oblique to cuo@xmath1 planes leads to novel states vortex matter decoration hall probe microscopy lorentz microscopy attraction between josephson vortex stacks pancake vortices solid state@xmath1sr leads to crossing - lattice@xcite state one of rich phase diagram occurence other structural phases vortex - soliton depends on interplay magnetic josephson coupling contributions pv lattice tilt modulus josephson plasma resonance jpr frequency @xmath4 sensitive to superconducting phase difference between cuo@xmath1 layers @xmath7 depends on alignment pv stacks jpr detect different vortex phases bi@xmath1sr@xmath2 single crystals cut from larger underdoped bi@xmath1sr crystal grown by travelling solvent floating zone technique jpr measured using cavity perturbation technique tm@xmath9 modes microwave electrical field aligned along sample @xmath0-axisorthogonal coils field components parallel perpendicular to cuo@xmath1 layers varying mode @xmath12 jpr frequency probe vortex solid liquid state magnetic - field dependance microwave absorption of bi@xmath1sr@xmath1cacu@xmath1o@xmath2 single crystal obtained at different frequencies figure shows microwave absorption sweeping @xmath11 at constant @xmath10 temperature @xmath13 jpr maximum microwave absorption field @xmath14 evolution absorption lineshape modified by @xmath10 intensity microwave response decreases for all frequencies josephson vortex lattice modulates c_-axis critical current@xcite jpr not develop in stacks of jvs for low values in - plane field ratio interlayer distance distance between stacks jvs high phase remains unaffected from cores remaining microwave absorption from jv - free regions decreases with @xmath10 @xmath10 changes field @xmath14 maximum absorption decrease @xmath14 observed in vortex solid at 31.2 and 39.4 ghz decrease @xmath18 consistent with addition jvl 19.2 22.9 ghz @xmath14 vortex liquid increases @xmath14-loci different temperatures shown fig . pv vortex lattice melting line @xmath13 increase @xmath14 observed vortex liquid state low pv densities solid phase addition pvs on dense lattice jvs @xmath19 increases @xmath0-axis critical current pvs adjust positions to jvl maximize @xmath18 same effect vortex liquid phase attraction between pvs jvs correlated vortex liquid density pvs smaller in jv - free regions microwave absorption jpr from regions increasing @xmath10 increases @xmath14 josephson vortices pv liquid controversial for low densities pvs correlated vortex liquid stable close to pv melting line low values perpendicular magnetic field
| 0.183782
| 1,116
| 558
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,902
|
in this paper , we add to the characterization of the fourier spectra for bernoulli convolution measures .
these measures are supported on cantor subsets of the line .
we prove that performing an odd additive translation to half the canonical spectrum for the @xmath0 cantor measure always yields an alternate spectrum .
we call this set an additive spectrum
. the proof works by connecting the additive set to a spectrum formed by odd multiplicative scaling .
|
traditional cantor sets are generated by iterations of an operation of down - scaling by fractions which are powers of a fixed positive integer .
for each iteration in the process , we leave gaps .
for example , the best - known ternary cantor set is formed by scaling down by @xmath1 and leaving a single gap in each step .
an associated cantor measure @xmath2 is then obtained by the same sort of iteration of scales , and , at each step , a renormalization . in accordance with classical harmonic analysis
, these measures may be seen to be infinite bernoulli convolutions .
our present analysis is motivated by earlier work , beginning with @xcite .
we consider recursive down - scaling by @xmath3 for @xmath4 and leave a single gap at each iteration - step .
it was shown in @xcite that the associated cantor measures @xmath5 have the property that @xmath6 possesses orthogonal fourier bases of complex exponentials ( i.e. fourier onbs ) .
more recently , it was shown in @xcite that the scales @xmath3 are the _ only _ values that generate measures with fourier bases . given a fixed cantor measure @xmath2 , a corresponding set of frequencies @xmath7 of exponents in an onb is said to be a _ spectrum _ for @xmath2 .
for example , in the case of recursive scaling by powers of @xmath0 , i.e. @xmath8 , a possible spectrum @xmath7 for @xmath9 has the form @xmath7 as shown below in equation .
a spectrum for a cantor measure turns out to be a _ lacunary _
( in the sense of szolem mandelbrojt ) set of integers or half integers .
we direct the interested reader to @xcite regarding lacunary series and their riesz products .
when @xmath10 and @xmath2 are fixed , we now become concerned with the possible variety of spectra .
given @xmath7 some canonical choice of spectrum for @xmath2 , then one possible way to construct a new fourier spectrum for @xmath9 is to scale by an odd positive integer @xmath11 to form a set @xmath12 .
while for some values of @xmath11 this scaling produces a spectrum , it is known that other values of @xmath11 do not yield spectra .
this particular question is intrinsically multiplicative : since @xmath2 is an infinite bernoulli convolution , the onb questions involve consideration of infinite products of the riesz type . despite this intuition
, we show here ( theorem [ thm : main ] ) that there is a connection between this multiplicative construction and a construction of new onbs with an additive operation .
we are then able to produce even more examples of these additive - construction spectra .
throughout this paper , we consider the hilbert space @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the @xmath0-bernoulli convolution measure .
this measure has a rich history , dating back to work of wintner and erds @xcite .
more recently , hutchinson @xcite developed a construction of bernoulli measures via iterated function systems ( ifss ) .
the measure @xmath14 is supported on a cantor subset @xmath15 of @xmath16 which entails scaling by @xmath0 . in 1998 ,
jorgensen and pedersen @xcite discovered that the hilbert space @xmath13 contains a fourier basis an orthonormal basis of exponential functions and hence allows for a fourier analysis .
for ease of notation , throughout this paper we will write @xmath17 for the function @xmath18 and for a discrete set @xmath7 we will write @xmath19 for the collection of exponentials @xmath20 .
there is a self - similarity inherent in the @xmath0-bernoulli convolution @xmath21 which yields an infinite product formulation for @xmath22 : @xmath23 exponential functions @xmath24 and @xmath25 are orthogonal when @xmath26 a collection of exponential functions @xmath19 indexed by the discrete set @xmath7 is an orthonormal basis for @xmath13 exactly when the function @xmath27 is the constant function @xmath28 .
we call the function @xmath29 the _ spectral function _ for the set @xmath7 .
the fourier basis for @xmath14 constructed in @xcite is the set @xmath30 , where @xmath31 if @xmath19 is an orthonormal basis ( onb ) for @xmath13 , we say that @xmath7 is a _ spectrum _ for @xmath14 .
it is straightforward to show that if @xmath7 is a spectrum for @xmath14 and @xmath11 is an odd integer , then @xmath32 is an orthogonal collection of exponential functions . in many cases , we find that @xmath32 is actually another onb @xcite .
this is rather surprising , or at least very different behavior from the usual fourier analysis on an interval with respect to lebesgue measure .
we often refer to the spectrum in equation as the _ canonical spectrum _ for @xmath13 , while other spectra for the same measure space can be called _ alternate spectra_.
in this section , we describe two naturally occurring isometries on @xmath13 which are defined via their action on the canonical fourier basis @xmath19 .
observe from equation that @xmath7 satisfies the invariance equation @xmath33 where @xmath34 denotes the disjoint union .
we then define @xmath35 since @xmath36 and @xmath37 map the onb elements into a proper subset of the onb , they are proper isometries . therefore ,
for @xmath38 we have @xmath39 and @xmath40 is a projection onto the range of the respective operator .
the adjoints of @xmath41 are readily computed ( see @xcite for details ) : @xmath42 and @xmath43 it is shown in ( * ? ? ?
* section 2 ) that the definitions of @xmath36 and @xmath37 extend to all @xmath44 for @xmath45 , i.e. @xmath46 for every integer @xmath47 , there is a @xmath48-algebra with @xmath49 generators called the cuntz algebra , which we denote by @xmath50 @xcite .
we will describe representations of @xmath51 which are generated by two isometries on @xmath13 satisfying the conditions below .
[ defn : cuntzrel ] we say that isometry operators @xmath52 on @xmath13 satisfy _ cuntz relations _
if 1 .
@xmath53 , 2 .
@xmath54 for @xmath55 .
when these relations hold , @xmath56 generate a representation of the cuntz algebra @xmath57 . from @xcite
, we know that @xmath36 and @xmath37 defined in equation satisfy the cuntz relations for @xmath58 , hence yield a representation of the cuntz algebra @xmath51 ( in fact , an irreducible representation ) within the algebra of bounded operators @xmath59 .
as we mentioned above , given a spectrum @xmath7 , the frequencies @xmath12 , for @xmath11 an odd integer , generate an orthonormal collection of exponential functions in @xmath9 .
given @xmath7 from equation , one question of interest is the characterization of the odd integers @xmath11 for which the scaled spectrum @xmath12 generates an onb . as a means of exploring this question , we let @xmath60 be the operator @xmath61 since @xmath60 maps an onb to an orthonormal collection , @xmath60 is an isometry and is unitary if and only if @xmath32 is an onb . the following lemmas provide useful relationships between the isometries @xmath36 , @xmath37 , and @xmath60 .
[ lem : vp ] let @xmath36 and @xmath37 be the isometry operators from equation .
if @xmath62 is a @xmath63-automorphism on @xmath59 , then the operator @xmath64 is unitary .
assume @xmath62 is a @xmath63-automorphism .
the cuntz relations on @xmath36 and @xmath37 give @xmath65 a similar computation proves that @xmath66 , hence @xmath67 is unitary .
[ lem : us1 ] let @xmath68 be the multiplication operator @xmath69 . given @xmath70 such that @xmath60 is unitary , we define the map @xmath71 on @xmath59
. then @xmath72 and @xmath73 .
it was proved in @xcite that @xmath60 commutes with @xmath36 for all odd @xmath11 , so @xmath72 .
since @xmath60 is unitary , we have @xmath74 .
we prove that @xmath75 , which is thus equivalent to the statement of the lemma .
@xmath76 therefore , @xmath77 we now discover a connection between the scaled spectrum @xmath12 and what we call an _ additive spectrum _
@xmath78 . it will turn out that this connection tells us more about the additive spectra than the scaled spectra .
[ thm : main ] given any odd natural number @xmath11 , if @xmath32 is an onb then @xmath78 is also an onb . since @xmath32 is an onb , we have that the operator @xmath60 from equation is a unitary operator .
we define the map on @xmath79 @xmath80 since @xmath60 is unitary , it is straightforward to verify that @xmath81 is a @xmath63-automorphism on @xmath59 .
if we apply @xmath81 to our operators @xmath36 and @xmath37 , we have by lemma [ lem : us1 ] , @xmath82 define the operator @xmath83 then @xmath84 is unitary by lemma [ lem : vp ] .
we see that if @xmath85 , i.e. @xmath86 for some @xmath87 , that @xmath88 since @xmath89 and @xmath90 by the cuntz relations . similarly , if @xmath91 , hence @xmath92 for some @xmath87 , then @xmath93 .
in fact , @xmath84 maps @xmath94 bijectively onto @xmath95 . therefore , since @xmath84 is unitary , we can conclude that @xmath78 is an onb for @xmath13 .
we now address the spectral functions recall equation for our additive sets .
we can use the splitting @xmath96 to divide the spectral function for @xmath7 into the corresponding terms @xmath97 denote the sums on the right - hand side of the equation above by @xmath98 and @xmath99 respectively .
more generally , denote @xmath100 [ prop : per ] the function @xmath101 is @xmath102-periodic . by theorem [ thm : main ] the sets @xmath103 and @xmath104 are both spectra for @xmath2 this follows because it is known ( see , for example , @xcite ) that the scaled sets @xmath105 and @xmath106 are spectra .
we therefore have @xmath107 using the fact that the set @xmath7 itself is also a spectrum , we have @xmath108 for all @xmath109 .
hence @xmath110 but we also observe that @xmath111 and @xmath112 , so the function @xmath101 is both @xmath113-periodic and @xmath114-periodic , hence is @xmath102-periodic .
the function @xmath115 is @xmath102-periodic .
we next observe that theorem [ thm : main ] is a stepping stone to the following result .
[ thm : dhs ] given any odd integer @xmath11 , the set @xmath116 $ ] is an onb for @xmath9 .
this is a direct result of proposition [ prop : per ] .
the spectral function for@xmath116 $ ] can be written in the two parts @xmath117 when @xmath118 , we have the canonical onb in the @xmath0 case .
otherwise , using the 2-periodicity of @xmath115 , we have @xmath119 since the spectral function is identically @xmath28 , the set @xmath116 $ ] is an onb for @xmath9 .
the authors would like to thank allan donsig for helpful conversations while writing an earlier version of this work .
we mention here that the existence of the spectra that we call the _ additive spectra _ for @xmath14 is not new .
they are among the examples described , from a different perspective , in section 5 of @xcite .
|
cantor sets generated by down - scaling by fractions powers of fixed positive integer each leave gaps ternary cantor set formed by scaling by @xmath1 single gap each step associated cantor measure @xmath2 obtained by same iteration renormalization measures infinite bernoulli convolutions present analysis motivated by earlier work @xcite consider recursive down - scaling by @xmath3 for @xmath4 single gap each iteration step associated cantor measures @xmath5 have @xmath6 possesses orthogonal fourier bases of complex exponentials scales @xmath3 generate measures with fourier bases fixed cantor measure @xmath2 corresponding set of frequencies @xmath7 exponents _ spectrum _ for @xmath2 recursive scaling by powers @xmath0 @xmath8 possible spectrum @xmath7 for @xmath9 has form @xmath7 spectrum for cantor measure lacunary set of integers or half integers direct reader to @xcite regarding lacunary series products when @xmath10 and @xmath2 fixed concerned with possible variety of spectra@xmath7 canonical choice spectrum for @xmath2 construct new fourier spectrum for @xmath9 scale odd positive integer @xmath11 form set @xmath12 some values @xmath11 scaling produces spectrum other values yield spectra question multiplicative @xmath2 infinite bernoulli convolution onb questions involve infinite products riesz type connection between multiplicative construction new onbs additive operation produce more examples additive - construction spectra consider hilbert space @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath0-bernoulli convolution measure measure rich history wintner erds @xcite hutchinson @xcite developed construction bernoulli measures via iterated function systems measure @xmath14 supported on cantor subset @xmath15 of @xmath16 scaling by @xmath0 1998 jorgensen pedersen @xcite discovered hilbert space @xmath13 contains fourier basis exponential functions allows fourier analysis write @xmath17 for function @xmath18 @xmath19 for collection exponentials @xmath20self - similarity in @xmath0-bernoulli convolution @xmath21 infinite product formulation for @xmath22 @xmath23 exponential functions @xmath24 orthogonal @xmath26 functions @xmath19 @xmath7 orthonormal basis for @xmath13 function @xmath27 constant function @xmath28 @xmath29 spectral function for set @xmath7 fourier basis for @xmath14 is set @xmath30 @xmath19 orthonormal basis for @xmath13 @xmath7 spectrum for @xmath14 @xmath7 spectrum for @xmath14 @xmath11 odd integer @xmath32 orthogonal functions @xmath32 another onb @xcite different behavior from fourier analysis lebesgue measure canonical spectrum for @xmath13 other alternate spectra two naturally occurring isometries on @xmath13 defined via action on canonical fourier basis @xmath19 @xmath7 satisfies invariance equation @xmath33 @xmath34 denotes disjoint union define @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 map onb elements into proper subset onb isometries @xmath38 @xmath39 and @xmath40 projection onto range of respective operatoradjoints @xmath41 computed see @xcite @xmath42 @xmath43 section 2 definitions @xmath36 @xmath37 extend @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 every integer @xmath47 @xmath48-algebra with @xmath49 generators cuntz algebra denote by @xmath50 @xcite representations @xmath51 generated by two isometries @xmath13 satisfying conditions isometry operators @xmath52 @xmath13 satisfy cuntz relations if @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 relations @xmath56 generate representation cuntz algebra @xmath57 @xmath36 @xmath37 satisfy cuntz relations for @xmath58 yield representation cuntz algebra @xmath51 irreducible representation algebra bounded operators @xmath59 spectrum @xmath7 frequencies @xmath12 @xmath11 odd integer generate orthonormal collection exponential functions in @xmath9 question characterization odd integers @xmath11 scaled spectrum @xmath12 generates onb @xmath60 operator @xmath61 maps onb orthonormal collection isometry unitary if @xmath32 is onblemmas provide relationships between isometries @xmath36 @xmath36 isometry operators if @xmath62 @xmath63-automorphism on @xmath59 operator @xmath64 unitary assume @xmath62 is @xmath63-automorphism cuntz relations on @xmath36 give @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 unitary @xmath68 be multiplication operator @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath60 unitary define map @xmath71 on @xmath59 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath60 commutes with @xmath36 for @xmath11 @xmath72 @xmath60 unitary have @xmath74 prove @xmath75 equivalent to statement lemma @xmath76 @xmath77 connection between scaled spectrum @xmath12 additive spectrum @xmath78 connection tells more about additive spectra than odd natural number @xmath11 if @xmath32 onb @xmath78 onb @xmath32 onb operator @xmath60 unitary define map on @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath60 unitary verify @xmath81 is @xmath63-automorphism on @xmath59apply @xmath81 to operators @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath82 define operator @xmath83 @xmath84 unitary lemma @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 by cuntz relations @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath87 @xmath93 @xmath84 maps @xmath94 onto @xmath95 @xmath84 unitary @xmath78 onb for @xmath13 address spectral functions recall equation for additive sets splitting @xmath96 divide spectral function @xmath7 into terms @xmath97 denote sums right - hand side equation by @xmath98 @xmath99 denote @xmath100 function @xmath101 is @xmath102-periodic sets @xmath103 and @xmath104 are spectra for @xmath2 scaled sets @xmath105 @xmath106 are spectra @xmath107 set @xmath7 spectrum @xmath108 for @xmath109 @xmath110 @xmath111 @xmath112 function @xmath101 is @xmath113-periodic @xmath114-periodic @xmath102-periodic function @xmath115 is @xmath102-periodicobserve theorem thm : main stepping stone result thm : dhs ] odd integer @xmath11 set @xmath116 $ onb for @xmath9 direct result of proposition prop : per ] spectral function@xmath116 $ written two parts @xmath117 @xmath118 canonical onb @xmath0 case 2-periodicity @xmath115 @xmath119 spectral function @xmath28 set @xmath116 $ onb for @xmath9 authors thank allan donsig conversations earlier version work existence additive spectra _ for @xmath14 not new examples described section 5 @xcite
| 0.431177
| 2,842
| 1,577
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,920
|
inversion of radon transforms is the mathematical foundation of many modern tomographic imaging modalities . in this paper
we study a conical radon transform , which is important for computed tomography taking compton scattering into account .
the conical radon transform we study integrates a function in @xmath0 over all conical surfaces having vertices on a hyperplane and symmetry axis orthogonal to this plane . as the main result
we derive exact reconstruction formulas of the filtered back - projection type for inverting this transform
. * keywords . * radon transform , conical projections , computed tomography , inversion formula , filtered back - projection . * ams subject classifications . *
44a12 , 45q05 , 92c55 .
|
suppose that @xmath1 , with @xmath2 , is a smooth function supported in the half space @xmath3 , and let @xmath4 be some real number .
we study the problem of reconstructing the function @xmath5 from the integrals @xmath6 for @xmath7 and @xmath8 .
( here @xmath9 is the unit sphere in @xmath10 and @xmath11 the surface measure on @xmath9 ) .
we call the function @xmath12 the conical radon transform of @xmath5 .
as illustrated in figure [ fig : cone ] , @xmath13 is the integral of @xmath5 over the one sided conical surface @xmath14 having vertex @xmath15 on the plane @xmath16 , symmetry axis @xmath17 , and half opening angle @xmath18 .
the product @xmath19 is the standard surface measure on @xmath14 , and @xmath20 is an additional radial weight that can be adapted to a particular application at hand . for @xmath21 ,
the function @xmath22 may be considered as a conical projection of @xmath5 onto @xmath23 .
integrates a function with support in the upper half space over one sided conical surfaces @xmath14 centered at @xmath24 having symmetry axis @xmath25 and half - angle @xmath26 . any point on @xmath14
can be written in the form @xmath27 with @xmath28 and @xmath29 .
the @xmath30 dimensional surface measure on @xmath14 is given by @xmath19 , with @xmath11 denoting the standard surface measure on @xmath31.,scaledwidth=80.0% ] inversion of the conical radon transform in three spatial dimension is important for computed tomography taking compton scattered photons into account @xcite . in @xcite
fourier reconstruction formulas have been derived for the cases @xmath32 . for two spatial dimensions ,
@xmath33 has been studied with @xmath32 in @xcite , where reconstruction formulas of the back - projection type have been derived . in dimensions
@xmath34 , the conical radon transform has , to the best of our knowledge , not been studied so far . in this paper
we study @xmath33 for any @xmath2 and any @xmath35 .
we derive explicit reconstruction formulas of the back - projection type ( see theorem [ thm : fbp ] ) as well as a fourier slice identity ( see theorem [ thm : fourierslice ] ) similar to the one of the classical radon transform .
before we present our main results we introduce some notation . by @xmath36 we denote the space of all functions defined on @xmath0 , that are @xmath37 and have compact support in @xmath38 . likewise @xmath39 denotes the space of all infinitely smooth functions defined on @xmath40 .
as can easily be seen , the conical radon transform defined by ( [ eq : c - radon ] ) is well defined as an operator @xmath41 .
points in @xmath0 will be written in the form @xmath42 with @xmath43 and @xmath44 .
the fourier transform of a function @xmath45 with respect to the first component is denoted by @xmath46 for @xmath47 .
the hankel transform of order @xmath48 in the second argument is denoted by @xmath49 for @xmath50 , where @xmath51 is the bessel function of the first kind of order @xmath48 .
note that for @xmath52 , we have @xmath53 and hence @xmath54 is closely related to the cosine transform .
similarly , we denote by @xmath55 the fourier transform of a function @xmath56 with respect to the first argument . finally , we denote by @xmath57 the riesz potential of @xmath58 , defined by @xmath59 the riesz potential is well defined if @xmath60 for every @xmath61 , which will always be the case in our considerations .
the central results of this paper are the following explicit reconstruction formulas for inverting the conical radon transform .
for[thm : fbp ] every @xmath35 , every @xmath62 and every @xmath63 , we have @xmath64 here @xmath65 is the riesz potential defined by ( [ eq : riesz ] ) .
see sections [ sec : fbp ] and [ sec : fbp2 ] .
the reconstruction formulas ( [ eq : fbp ] ) , ( [ eq : fbp2 ] ) are of the filtered back - projection type : the riesz potential can be interpreted as a filtration step in the first argument and the integrations actually sum over all conical surfaces that pass through the reconstruction point @xmath63 . in analogy to the classical radon transform the integration process may therefore be called _ conical back - projection_. note that ( [ eq : fbp ] ) , ( [ eq : fbp2 ] ) only differ up to a different parametrization of the set of all conical surfaces passing through the reconstruction point . for practical applications ,
the two and three dimensional situations are the most relevant ones . in these cases
the formulas of theorem [ thm : fbp ] read as follows . 1 . [ it : fbp-2d ] suppose @xmath52 .
then , for every @xmath66 and every @xmath67 , @xmath68 here @xmath69 and @xmath70 denote the derivative and the hilbert transform in first argument .
[ it : fbp-3d ] suppose @xmath71 .
then , for every @xmath72 and every @xmath73 , @xmath74 here @xmath75 denotes the laplacian in the first component . for @xmath52
we have the fourier representation @xmath76 and @xmath77 of the hilbert transform and the one dimensional derivative , respectively .
this shows @xmath78 .
hence item [ it : fbp-2d ] follows from theorem [ thm : fbp ] .
similarly , for @xmath71 , we have @xmath79 and hence item [ it : fbp-3d ] again follows from theorem [ thm : fbp ] . for @xmath52 , formulas equivalent to the ones of theorem [ thm : fbp-23d ] [ it : fbp-2d ]
have been first derived in @xcite .
the three dimensional reconstruction formulas of theorem [ thm : fbp-23d ] [ it : fbp-3d ] ( as well as the higher dimensional generalizations of theorem [ thm : fbp ] ) are new .
one notes , that in three spatial dimensions the reconstruction formulas are particularly simple and further local : the reconstruction of @xmath5 at some reconstruction point @xmath42 only requires the integrals over cones passing through an arbitrarily small neighbourhood of @xmath42 . since for any odd @xmath80 ,
the riesz potential satisfies @xmath81 , the reconstruction formulas ( [ eq : fbp ] ) , ( [ eq : fbp2 ] ) are in fact local for every odd space dimensions .
contrary , in even space dimension ( [ eq : fbp ] ) , ( [ eq : fbp2 ] ) are non - local : recovering a function at a single point requires knowledge of the integrals over all conical surfaces .
this behaviour is similar to the one of the classical radon transform , where also the inversion is local in odd and non - local in even dimensions ( see , for example , @xcite ) .
theorem [ thm : fbp ] will be established using the following theorem [ thm : fourierslice ] , which an analogon of the well known fourier slice identity ( * ? ? ?
* chapter 1 , theorem 1.1 ) satisfied by the classical radon transform . for every @xmath35 , every @xmath82 and every @xmath83 , we have @xmath84 here
@xmath85 is the function @xmath86 , @xmath87 the fourier transform in the first argument , and @xmath88 the hankel transform of order @xmath89 in the second argument .
see section [ sec : fs ] .
the fourier slice identity is of course of interest on its own .
the argument @xmath90 , for @xmath91 and @xmath92 , appearing on the left hand side of ( [ eq : fourierslice ] ) , fills in the whole upper half - space , which is required to invert the fourier - hankel transform using well known explicit and stable inversion formulas .
hence the function @xmath5 can be reconstructed based on ( [ eq : fourierslice ] ) by means of a @xmath30-dimensional fourier transform , followed by an interpolation , and finally performing an inverse @xmath80-dimensional fourier - hankel transform .
the remainder of the paper is mainly devoted to the proofs of theorems [ thm : fbp ] and [ thm : fourierslice ] that we will establish in the following section [ sec : proofs ] .
we will first derive the fourier slice identity of theorem [ thm : fourierslice ] , which will then be used to proof the reconstruction formulas of theorem [ thm : fbp ] .
the paper ends with a discussion in section [ sec : discussion ] .
in this section we derive theorems [ thm : fbp ] and [ thm : fourierslice ] .
the following elementary lemma shows that it suffices to derive these results for the special case @xmath93 .
for[lem : munu ] every @xmath35 , every @xmath82 and every @xmath94 , we have @xmath95 here @xmath96 stands for the operator that multiplies a function @xmath97 by @xmath96 and likewise @xmath98 stands for the operator that multiplies @xmath99 by @xmath100 .
the definition of @xmath33 and the substitution @xmath101 yield @xmath102 comparing the last expression for @xmath103 with the corresponding expression for @xmath104 obviously shows ( [ eq : munu ] ) .
we start by showing ( [ eq : fourierslice ] ) for the special case @xmath93
. the general case will then be a consequence of lemma [ lem : munu ] .
the definition of the conical radon transform , the definition of the fourier transform and some basic manipulations yield @xmath105 } { \mathrm d}s\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] now we use the identity ( see , for example , @xcite ) , @xmath106 application of ( [ eq : ps ] ) with @xmath107 followed by the substitution @xmath108 yields @xmath109 the last displayed equation is recognised as the hankel transform of order @xmath110 of @xmath111 in the second argument .
we conclude , that @xmath112 this shows ( [ eq : fourierslice ] ) for the special case @xmath93 .
for general @xmath35 we use the relation @xmath113 from lemma [ lem : munu ] .
together with ( [ eq : fs-0 ] ) this yields @xmath114 this is ( [ eq : fourierslice ] ) for the case of general @xmath35 and concludes the proof of theorem [ thm : fourierslice ] .
we start with the proof of ( [ eq : fbp ] ) for @xmath93 .
application of the inversion formulas for the fourier and the hankel transform followed by the substitution @xmath115 shows @xmath116 application of the fourier slice identity ( theorem [ thm : fourierslice ] ) with @xmath93 and interchanging the order of integration then yields @xmath117 by ( [ eq : ps ] ) , we have @xmath118 therefore , @xmath119 } \\ & = { \left(2\pi\right)}^{\frac{{d}-1}{2 } } \int_{s^{{d}-2 } } { \left(\tan{\left(\theta\right ) } { y}\right)}^{\frac{{d}-3}{2 } } { \left({\mathcal i}^{(1-{d})}{\mathcal r}^{(0 ) } f\right)}{\left({\mathbf x}- \tan{\left(\theta\right ) } { y}{\mathbf n},\theta\right ) } { \mathrm d}{\mathbf n}\ , .
\end{aligned}\end{gathered}\ ] ] together with ( [ eq : aux1 ] ) this further implies @xmath120 this shows formula ( [ eq : fbp ] ) for the special case @xmath93 .
to show ( [ eq : fbp ] ) in the general case @xmath35 , we again use the relation @xmath121 from lemma [ lem : munu ] .
hence application of the reconstruction formula for the special case @xmath93 to @xmath122 yields @xmath123 this shows ( [ eq : fbp ] ) in the general case @xmath124
. finally we derive ( [ eq : fbp2 ] ) as an easy consequence of ( [ eq : fbp ] ) . to that end
we first substitute @xmath125 with @xmath126
. then @xmath127 and @xmath128 .
consequently , ( [ eq : fbp ] ) implies @xmath129 now we substitute @xmath130 ( polar coordinates in the plane @xmath131 around the center @xmath132 ) . then @xmath133 and @xmath134 . consequently , @xmath135 this is the reconstruction formula ( [ eq : fbp2 ] ) .
in this paper we derived explicit reconstruction formulas for the conical radon transform , which integrates a function in @xmath80 spatial variables over all cones with vertices on a hyperplane and symmetry axis orthogonal to this plane .
the derived formulas are of the back - projection type and are theoretically exact .
further , they are local for odd @xmath80 , and non - local for even @xmath80 . among others ,
inversion of the conical radon transform is relevant for emission tomography using compton cameras as proposed in @xcite .
such a device measures the direction as well as the scattering angle of an incoming photon at the front of the camera .
the location of the photon emission can therefore be traced back to the surface of a cone .
recovering the density of the photon source therefore yields to the inversion of the conical radon transform in a natural manner .
radon transforms are the theoretical foundation of many medical imaging and remote sensing application .
certainly the most well known instance is the classical radon transform , which integrates a function over hyperplanes . among others ,
inversion of the classical radon transform is important for classical transmission computed tomography and has been studied in many textbooks ( see , for example , @xcite ) .
closed form reconstruction formulas are known for a long time and have first been derived already in 1917 by j. radon @xcite .
another radon transform that has been studied in detail more recently is the spherical radon transform .
this transform integrates a function over spherical surfaces ( for some restricted centers of integration ) and is , among others , important for photo- and thermoacoustic tomography @xcite .
closed form reconstruction formulas for planar and spherical center sets have been found in @xcite .
the conical radon transform , on the other hand , is much less studied . in particular ,
closed form reconstruction formulas have only been known for the case @xmath136 , see @xcite . in this paper we derived such reconstruction formulas for arbitrary dimension @xmath2 . for computed tomography with compton cameras @xcite ,
the three dimensional case is of course the most relevant one . in this case ,
our reconstruction formulas have a particularly simple structure and consist of an application of the laplacian followed by a conical back - projection .
the numerical implementation seems quite straight forward following the ones of the classical or the spherical radon transform ( see , for example , @xcite ) .
numerical studies , however , will be subject of future research .
|
@xmath1 @xmath2 smooth function half space @xmath3 @xmath4 real number reconstructing function @xmath5 from integrals @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 unit sphere @xmath10 surface measure @xmath9 function @xmath12 conical radon transform @xmath5 @xmath13 integral @xmath5 sided conical surface @xmath14 vertex @xmath15 plane symmetry axis @xmath17 half opening angle @xmath18 product @xmath19 standard surface measure @xmath14 @xmath20 additional radial weight application @xmath21 function @xmath22 conical projection @xmath5 @xmath23 function upper half space one sided conical surfaces @xmath14 @xmath24 symmetry axis @xmath25 half - angle @xmath26 point @xmath14 form @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 dimensional surface measure @xmath14 @xmath19 @xmath11 standard surface measure @xmath31 inversion conical radon transform computed tomography reconstruction formulas derived cases @xmath32two spatial dimensions @xmath33 studied with @xmath32 @xcite reconstruction formulas back - projection type derived dimensions @xmath34 conical radon transform not studied paper study @xmath33 @xmath2 and @xmath35 derive reconstruction formulas back - projection type fourier slice identity similar classical radon transform introduce notation @xmath36 space functions @xmath0 @xmath37 support @xmath38 @xmath39 denotes space infinitely smooth functions @xmath40 conical radon transform defined by c - radon defined operator @xmath41 points @xmath0 written form @xmath42 with @xmath43 and @xmath44 fourier transform function @xmath45 first component denoted by @xmath46 for @xmath47 hankel transform order @xmath48 second argument denoted by @xmath49 for @xmath50 @xmath51 bessel function first kind order @xmath48 @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 related to cosine transform denote by @xmath55 fourier transform function @xmath56 first argumentdenote @xmath57 riesz potential @xmath58 defined @xmath59 defined @xmath60 @xmath61 central results reconstruction formulas inverting conical radon transform[thm : fbp ] @xmath35 @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 riesz potential defined [ eq : riesz ] ) sections [ sec : fbp ] sec : fbp2 ] reconstruction formulas eq : fbp ] fbp2 filtered back - projection type riesz potential filtration step first argument integrations sum over conical surfaces reconstruction point @xmath63 integration process conical back - projection_ [ eq : fbp ] eq : fbp2 ] differ different parametrization conical surfaces reconstruction point practical applications two three dimensional situations relevant formulas theorem : fbp ] : fbp-2d ] @xmath52 @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 denote derivative hilbert transform first argument : fbp-3d ] suppose @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 denotes laplacian first component@xmath52 fourier representation @xmath76 @xmath77 hilbert transform one dimensional derivative shows @xmath78 item : fbp-2d ] follows theorem thm : fbp @xmath71 @xmath79 item : fbp-3d ] follows theorem thm : fbp @xmath52 formulas equivalent theorem : fbp-23d derived @xcite three reconstruction formulas theorem thm : fbp-23d fbp-3d higher dimensional generalizations theorem thm : fbp new three spatial dimensions reconstruction formulas simple local reconstruction @xmath5 reconstruction point @xmath42 requires integrals over cones small neighbourhood @xmath42 @xmath80 riesz potential satisfies @xmath81 reconstruction formulas eq : fbp ] fbp2 ] local odd space dimensions even space dimension fbp fbp2 non - local recovering function single point requires knowledge integrals conical surfaces behaviour similar classical radon transform inversion local odd non - local even dimensions @xcite theorem [ thm : fbp ] established theorem [ thm : fourierslice ] analogon fourier slice identity chapter 1 theorem 1.1 ) satisfied classical radon transform@xmath35 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 function @xmath86 @xmath87 fourier transform first argument @xmath88 hankel transform @xmath89 second argument see section sec : fs ] fourier slice identity interest argument @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 left side eq : fourierslice fills upper half - space invert fourier - hankel transform inversion formulas function @xmath5 reconstructed eq : fourierslice @xmath30-dimensional fourier transform interpolation inverse @xmath80-dimensional fourier - hankel transform remainder paper devoted proofs theorems [ thm : fbp ] : fourierslice ] section sec proofs derive fourier slice identity theorem : fourierslice proof reconstruction formulas theorem fbp paper ends discussion section [ sec : discussion ] derive theorems [ thm : fbp ] fourierslice ] lemma suffices derive results special case @xmath93 every @xmath35 @xmath82 @xmath94 @xmath95 here @xmath96 operator multiplies function @xmath97 by @xmath96 @xmath98 operator multiplies @xmath99 by @xmath100definition @xmath33 substitution @xmath101 yield @xmath102 expression @xmath103 @xmath104 shows eq : munu ] showing eq : fourierslice ] special case @xmath93 general case consequence lemma lem : munu conical radon transform fourier transform basic manipulations yield @xmath105 use identity @xmath106 application eq : ps ] @xmath107 substitution @xmath108 yields @xmath109 last equation hankel transform @xmath110 @xmath111 second argument @xmath112 shows eq : fourierslice ] special case @xmath93 general @xmath35 relation @xmath113 lemma lem : munu eq : fs-0 ] yields @xmath114 [ eq : fourierslice ] general @xmath35 concludes proof theorem thm : fourierslice start proof [ eq : fbp ] @xmath93inversion formulas fourier hankel transform substitution @xmath115 shows @xmath116 fourier slice identity with @xmath93 interchanging order integration yields @xmath117 eq : ps @xmath118 @xmath119 \left(2\right)\frac{{d}-1}{2 }}-2\theta\right )\frac{{d}-3}{2 }\mathcal i-\mathcal r}{(0\right\mathbf x}\theta\right )\mathbf\theta\right\mathbf n}{aligned{gathered eq : aux1 ] implies @xmath120 formula [ eq : fbp ] special case @xmath93 show eq : fbp ] general case @xmath35 use relation @xmath121 from lemma munu reconstruction formula special case @xmath93 to @xmath122 yields @xmath123 shows [ eq : fbp ] general case @xmath124 derive [ eq : fbp2 ] ) consequence [ eq : fbp ] substitute @xmath125 with @xmath126 @xmath127 @xmath128( [ eq : fbp ] ) implies @xmath129 substitute @xmath130 ( polar coordinates plane @xmath131 center @xmath132 ) @xmath133 @xmath134 @xmath135 reconstruction formula ( [ eq : fbp2 ] ) derived reconstruction formulas for conical radon transform integrates function in @xmath80 spatial variables over cones vertices on hyperplane symmetry axis orthogonal plane formulas back - projection type theoretically exact local for odd @xmath80 non - local for even @xmath80 inversion conical radon transform relevant for emission tomography compton cameras measures direction scattering angle incoming photon location photon emission traced back to surface cone recovering density photon source yields inversion conical radon transform radon transforms theoretical foundation medical imaging remote sensing classical radon transform integrates function over hyperplanes inversion important for classical transmission computed tomography studied in textbooks closed form reconstruction formulas derived in 1917 by j. radon @xcite spherical radon transform integrates function over spherical surfaces important for photo- thermoacoustic tomographyclosed form reconstruction formulas for planar spherical center sets found in @xcite conical radon transform less studied closed form formulas known for case @xmath136 paper derived formulas for arbitrary dimension @xmath2 for computed tomography with compton cameras @xcite three dimensional case most relevant reconstruction formulas simple structure application laplacian conical back - projection numerical implementation straight forward classical spherical radon transform numerical studies subject future research
| 0.56707
| 3,544
| 1,915
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,921
|
the dependence of pseudo - scalar masses and decay constants on the sea and valence quark masses is investigated in the pseudo - goldstone boson sector of qcd with two light quark flavours .
the sea quark masses are at present in the range @xmath0 whereas the valence quark masses satisfy @xmath1 .
the values of the gasser - leutwyler low energy constants @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 are estimated .
the computation is done with the wilson - quark lattice action at gauge coupling @xmath6 on @xmath7 lattices .
@xmath8 effects are taken into account by applying chiral perturbation theory for the wilson lattice action as proposed by rupak and shoresh .
|
monte carlo simulations of qcd with dynamical quarks are done in most cases at relatively large quark masses ( typically two quark flavours with @xmath9 ) .
this makes the extrapolation to the physical point @xmath10 rather uncertain .
the extrapolation is done by using ( pq)chpt typically to nlo ( 1-loop ) order .
estimates @xcite show that one should perform simulations in the range @xmath11 in order to see the expected logarithmic dependence . matching
the predicted functional dependence is a crucial test for lattice qcd . until recently the comparison between lattice data and chpt was not satisfactory . in a recent paper
@xcite we suggested that the agreement can be found when going to light enough dynamical quarks .
here we supplement some integration of the analysis of @xcite and provide some further comments .
for our simulation we used the algorithm described in @xcite and further improved as in @xcite and references therein . in our range of parameters we found that the cost for producing one independent gauge field configuration roughly goes as : @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the quark mass in lattice unit , @xmath14 is the number of lattice points and the factor @xmath15flop for the plaquette , but one order of magnitude smaller for @xmath16 and @xmath17 .
we produced three sets of @xmath18 thermalized configurations for @xmath19 unimproved wilson fermions at vol@xmath20 , @xmath6 and @xmath21 . from these points we extrapolated a value of @xmath22 at @xmath23 which is @xmath24 .
this corresponds to an uv cutoff @xmath25fm @xmath26 , and to a physical volume @xmath27fm . in those three points we found a ratio @xmath28 equal to @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 respectively . here
@xmath32 represents the sea quark mass defined as @xmath33 , when the strange quark mass corresponds to @xmath34 @xcite . for the lightest valence quarks the ratios @xmath35 become respectively @xmath36 , @xmath37 and @xmath38 .
even with these small quark masses finite volume effects are expected to be under control since we have always @xmath39 . of course
this is payed with a very low uv cutoff , and one expects large lattice artifacts .
these are taken into account in the analysis .
our first goal is to confront the results of numerical simulations with the ( pq)chpt formulas @xcite . in order to cancel the @xmath40-factors of multiplicative renormalization , which in the case of a mass - independent renormalization scheme only depend on the gauge coupling and not on the quark mass , we considered ratios of quark masses ( @xmath41 ) , pion masses ( @xmath42 ) and pion decay constants ( @xmath43 ) . here
@xmath44 stand for the flavor indices of valence ( @xmath45 ) or sea ( @xmath46 ) quarks .
if we assume that there are no lattice artifacts , no nnlo corrections and we take for @xmath47 its tree level estimate , @xmath48 , then the ratios ( here @xmath49 ) @xmath50 , \\
rrn \hspace{-7pt } & \equiv & \hspace{-7pt } \frac{4\xi m_{vs}^4}{(\xi\hspace{-3pt}+\hspace{-3pt}1)^2m_{vv}^2 m_{ss}^2 } \hspace{-3pt}= \hspace{-3pt}1 + \hspace{-3pt}\frac{\chi_s^{est } [ \log(\xi)\hspace{-3pt}-\hspace{-3pt}\xi \hspace{-3pt}+\hspace{-3pt}1]}{16n_s\pi^2 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] are non trivial and parameterless predictions of chpt .
this provides a strong check of how far we are from the nlo chpt regime . in figure
[ fig : rrf ] and [ fig : rrn ] we superimpose the predicted functions to the data .
the agreement is of course not complete ( there are indeed @xmath51 and nnlo effects ) , but the corrections are sub - dominant contributions .
moreover the agreement improves when the sea quark masses decrease . encouraged by this results
, we systematically compared our data with those ratios of pion masses and coupling constants which determine the gasser - leutwyler @xcite coefficients @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 .
since we expected large lattice artifacts in the data , the comparison was done with w(pq)chpt @xcite , including @xmath51 lattice artifacts in the effective continuum theory .
besides that , we also included the relevant contributions from nnlo chpt @xcite .
although this involve many parameters , one can obtain enough constraints from partially quenched simulations .
the details of the fitting procedure and the results are described in @xcite .
here we simply add that , following the analysis of @xcite , we can now include also @xmath52 lattice artifacts in our fit of the pion mass ratios .
it turns out that this does not add new parameters to the fit , but it amounts to a redefinition of the wilson - chpt coefficients @xmath53 . in order to have a consistency check of the surprisingly small lattice artifacts that we found , we compared the results of @xcite with those obtained in an older simulation with larger lattice spacing ( @xmath54 , @xmath55fm ) @xcite . the comparison ( fig .
[ fig : scarr ] and [ fig : scafvv ] ) shows quite small scale breaking .
larger scale breaking ( @xmath56 ) are observed for the ratio @xmath57 , which at fixed @xmath58 goes from @xmath59 ( at @xmath6 ) to @xmath60 ( at @xmath61 ) .
to summarize : we showed that it is possible to simulate , with reasonable costs , very light dynamical quarks .
compensating @xmath51 effects by introducing @xmath51 terms in the pqch - lagrangian is , in this case , a viable alternative to @xmath51 improvement of the action .
the observed @xmath51 contributions in the light goldstone boson sector are surprisingly small , while nnlo are still important .
the expected behavior predicted by pqchpt is already visible , although a quantitative determination of the lec s still needs further simulations at smaller masses and lattice spacing .
most of the numerical calculations presented here have been done at the computers of nic - juelich and zeuthen
. 9 s.r .
sharpe , n. shoresh , phys . rev .
* d62 * ( 2000 ) 094503 ; hep - lat/0006017 .
s. drr , hep - lat/0208051 .
qq+q collaboration , f. farchioni , i. montvay , e. scholz and l. scorzato , to appear in eur .
j. ; hep - lat/0307002 .
i. montvay , nucl . phys .
* b466 * ( 1996 ) 259 ; hep - lat/9510042 .
qq+q collaboration , f. farchioni , c. gebert , i. montvay and l. scorzato , eur .
j. * c26 * ( 2002 ) 237 ; hep - lat/0206008 .
bernard , m.f.l .
golterman , phys .
* d49 * ( 1994 ) 486 ; hep - lat/9306005 .
j. gasser and h. leutwyler , annals phys .
* 158 * ( 1984 ) 142 .
g. rupak , n. shoresh , phys . rev .
* d66 * ( 2002 ) 054503 ; hep - lat/0201019 .
sharpe , r. van de water , these proceedings ; hep - lat/0308010 .
o. baer , g. rupak and n. shoresh , hep - lat/0306021 .
qq+q collaboration , f. farchioni , c. gebert , i. montvay , e. scholz and l. scorzato , phys .
lett . * b561 * ( 2003 ) 102 ; hep - lat/0302011 .
|
monte carlo simulations qcd with dynamical quarks at large quark masses two flavours with @xmath9 extrapolation to physical point @xmath10 uncertain extrapolation pq)chpt nlo 1-loop order estimates show simulations in @xmath11 logarithmic dependence matching predicted functional dependence crucial for lattice qcd comparison between lattice data and chpt satisfactory agreement light enough dynamical quarks analysis comments simulation used algorithm @xcite improved cost for producing one independent gauge field configuration @xmath12 quark mass in lattice unit number of lattice points factor @xmath15flop for plaquette smaller for @xmath16 @xmath17 produced three sets of @xmath18 thermalized configurations for @xmath19 at@xmath20 @xmath6 @xmath21 extrapolated value of @xmath22 at @xmath23 @xmath24 corresponds to uv cutoff @xmath25fm @xmath26 physical volume @xmath27fm ratio @xmath28 equal to @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 represents sea quark mass @xmath33 strange quark mass to @xmath34lightest valence quarks ratios @xmath35 become @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 small quark masses finite volume effects expected under control @xmath39 low uv cutoff large lattice artifacts in analysis goal confront results numerical simulations with pq)chpt formulas @xcite cancel @xmath40-factors of multiplicative renormalization on gauge coupling not quark mass considered ratios of quark masses @xmath41 ) pion masses @xmath42 ) pion decay constants ( @xmath43 ) @xmath44 flavor indices of valence @xmath45 sea @xmath46 ) quarks no lattice artifacts no nnlo corrections @xmath47 tree level estimate @xmath48 ratios @xmath49 ) @xmath50 \hspace{-7pt }{-7pt\hspace{-3pt}+\hspace{-3pt}= \hspace{-3pt}1 + \hspace{-3pt}\frac\hspace{-3pt}{-3pt}^2 non trivial parameterless predictions of chpt provides strong check from nlo chpt regime in figure rrf rrn ] superimpose predicted functions to data agreement not complete @xmath51 nnlo effects corrections sub - dominant agreement improves when sea quark masses decrease compared data with ratios pion masses coupling constants gasser - leutwyler @xcite coefficients @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 expected large lattice artifacts comparison done with w(pq)chpt @xcite including @xmath51 lattice artifacts in effective continuum theory included relevant contributions from nnlo chpt @xcite obtain constraints from partially quenched simulations details fitting procedure results described in @xcite include @xmath52 lattice artifacts in fit pion mass ratios not add new parameters fit redefinition of wilson - chpt coefficients @xmath53 consistency check compared results @xcite with older simulation with larger lattice spacing ( @xmath54 @xmath55fm ) @xcite comparison shows small scale breaking scale breaking @xmath56 observed ratio @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 to @xmath60 possible simulate reasonable costs light dynamical quarks compensating @xmath51 effects introducing terms pqch - lagrangian viable alternative @xmath51 improvement observed @xmath51 contributions light goldstone boson sector small nnlo important expected behavior predicted pqchpt visible quantitative determination needs simulations smaller masses lattice spacing numerical calculations done computers nic - juelich zeuthen sharpe shoresh phys . rev. d62 ( 2000 ) 094503 hep - lat/0006017 lat/0208051 collaboration farchioni montvay scholz scorzato hep - lat/0307002 montvay b466 ( 1996 ) 259 ; hep - lat/9510042 collaboration farchioni gebert montvay scorzato c26 ( 2002 ) 237 ; hep - lat/0206008 bernard golterman phys. d49 ( 1994 ) 486 ; hep - lat/9306005 gasser leutwyler annals phys . 158 ( 1984 ) 142 rupakshoresh rev d66 2002 ) 054503 hep - lat/0201019 sharpe van water proceedings hep lat/0308010 baer rupak shoresh lat/0306021 collaboration farchioni gebert montvay scholz scorzato phys b561 2003 ) 102 hep lat/0302011
| 0.311158
| 1,876
| 983
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,936
|
since kaiser introduced galaxies as a biased tracer of the underlying total mass field , the linear galaxies bias , @xmath0 appears ubiquitously both in theoretical calculations and in observational measurements related to galaxy surveys .
however , the generic approaches to the galaxy density is a non - local and stochastic function of the underlying dark matter density and it becomes difficult to make the analytic form of @xmath0 . due to this fact
, @xmath0 is known as a nuisance parameter and the effort has been made to measure bias free observable quantities .
we provide the exact and analytic function of @xmath0 which also can be measured from galaxy surveys using the redshift space distortions parameters , more accurately unbiased observable @xmath1 .
we also introduce approximate solutions for @xmath0 for different gravity theories .
one can generalize these approximate solutions to be exact when one solves the exact evolutions for the dark matter density fluctuation of given gravity theories .
these analytic solutions for @xmath0 make it advantage instead of nuisance .
|
there have been many models for the evolution of the bias @xmath0 derived from empirical knowledge @xcite , theory @xcite , simulations and from observations which account for the growth and merging of collapsed structure @xcite .
however , all of these bias fitting forms include the unknown free parameters which need to be fitted with the set of galaxy bias data and simulation .
it is shown that an incorrect bias model causes a shift in measured values of cosmological parameters @xcite . thus , the accurate modeling to @xmath0 is prerequisite for the precision cosmology .
we obtain the exact linear bias obtained from its definition and show its dependence both on cosmology and on gravity theory .
we provide @xmath0 which can be obtained from both theory and observation .
this analytic solution for the bias allows one to use it as a cosmological parameter instead of a nuisance one .
the observed linear galaxy power spectrum using a fiducial model including the effects of bias and the redshift space distortions is given by @xcite p_gal^(k,z ) = b^2 p_m(k , z_0 ) ( 1 + ^2)^2 ( ) ^2 [ pgal ] , where @xmath2 ( ratio of the hubble parameter of the adopted fiducial model , @xmath3 to that of the true model , @xmath4 ) , @xmath5 ( ratio of the angular diameter distance of the true model , @xmath6 to that of the adopted fiducial model , @xmath7 ) , @xmath8 defining the linear bias factor , @xmath9 means the present matter power spectrum , the redshift space distortions ( rsd ) parameter , @xmath10 is defined as @xmath11 , and @xmath12 is the linear growth factor of the matter fluctuation , @xmath13 with @xmath14 meaning @xmath15 .
if one adopts the definition of the linear bias as @xmath16 , then one obtains @xmath17 .
both @xmath10 and @xmath18 are obtained from observations , and theories predict @xmath19 and @xmath20 .
if one takes the derivative of @xmath21 with respect to @xmath22 , then one obtains ( _ we use @xmath23 for @xmath21 below _ ) b(k , z ) & = & ( z ) ^-1 + & = & ( z ) ^-1 [ bkz ] , where we use @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 denoting the observed fractional rms in galaxy number density , @xmath27 , and @xmath28 ( under the assumption of the flat universe ) , respectively .
one can refer the appendix for detail derivation .
all quantities in the second equality of eq .
( [ bkz ] ) are measurable from galaxy surveys .
both @xmath18 and @xmath29 are measured from galaxy surveys @xcite .
also @xmath30 can be directly measured from @xmath18 and @xmath29 @xcite .
thus , one can measure the time evolution of bias if there exists enough binned data to measure @xmath31 .
future galaxy surveys will provide the sub - percent level accuracy in measuring @xmath29 @xcite and will make the accurate measurement of bias possible .
( [ bkz ] ) holds for any gravity theory because it is derived from its definition . from the above eq .
( [ bkz ] ) , one can understand the theoretical motivation for the formulae of @xmath32 @xcite .
if one assumes @xmath18 is constant , then one obtains @xmath33 .
thus , the magnitude of @xmath34 is determined by the measured value of @xmath18 which might depend on luminosity , color , and spectral type of galaxies .
however , there is no reason to believe that @xmath18 is time independent .
thus , we regard @xmath18 as a time dependent observable in eq .
( [ bkz ] ) .
in addition , the time evolution of bias is completely determined from observations of @xmath18 and @xmath29 .
we assume the form of @xmath35 to investigate its behavior where we assign the dependence of bias on galaxy properties into @xmath36 .
in this case , the galaxy dependence on @xmath37 is absorbed in @xmath36 solely .
the cosmological dependence on bias is represented by @xmath38 , @xmath39 , and @xmath23 . actually , @xmath40 depends on @xmath38 , @xmath30 , and the underlying gravity theory .
we restrict our consideration for the linear regime and one can solve the sub - horizon solution for the @xmath13 to obtain the growth factor , @xmath12 for the given model .
one can numerically solve this for given models . even though we just investigate the constant dark energy equation of state @xmath38cdm , @xmath41 , and dgp model in this _ letter _
, one can generalize the consideration for the any model by solving @xmath13 numerically . in this subsection
, we investigate the evolution of bias for different cosmological parameters ( @xmath38 and @xmath30 ) under the general relativity ( gr ) .
for the constant dark energy equation of state , @xmath38 , there exists the known exact analytic solution for the linear growth rate , @xmath12 @xcite .
we adopt this solution to show both the cosmology and the astrophysics dependence on @xmath0 .
one can generalize the time dependent @xmath38 by using the numerical solution for the @xmath12 .
we depict the dependence of @xmath0 on @xmath38 and @xmath30 in fig .
[ fig1 ] . in the left panle of fig .
[ fig1 ] , we show the evolution of @xmath0 for different values of @xmath38 fixed @xmath44 , @xmath45 , and @xmath46 .
the dashed , solid , and dotted lines correspond @xmath47 -1.2 , -1.0 , and -0.8 , respectively . as @xmath38 decreases , so does @xmath0 .
this is due to the fact that if @xmath38 increases , then both @xmath12 and @xmath48 decrease .
the difference of @xmath0 between models increases , as @xmath22 increases .
the difference between @xmath49 and @xmath50 is about 4.4 ( 3.5 ) % at @xmath51 .
we also show the @xmath0 dependence on @xmath30 for @xmath43cdm model in the right panel of fig .
the dashed , solid , and dotted lines correspond @xmath52 0.35 , 0.3 , and 0.25 , respectively for @xmath43cdm model .
as @xmath30 increases , so do @xmath12 and @xmath48 .
thus , @xmath0 decreases as @xmath30 increases .
the difference between @xmath53 and @xmath44 is about 3.8 ( 3.2 ) % at @xmath51 .
even though we limit our consideration for the constant @xmath38 with the flat universe , one can generalize the investigation for the time varying @xmath38 and the non - flat universe by solving the sub - horizon equation numerically .
also one can find the time varying @xmath38 model which produce the same cmb result for the constant @xmath38 models @xcite .
[ cols="^,^ " , ]
we obtain the exact analytic solution for the linear bias .
this solution can investigate both cosmological and astrophysical dependence on bias without any ambiguity . from this solution , one can exactly estimate the time evolution of bias for different models .
the different gravity theories provide the different bias .
thus , this provides the consistent check for the cosmological dependence on the measured galaxy power spectrum for the given model .
this solution can be generalized to many models including the modified gravity theories and the massive neutrino dark matter model by replacing the approximate solution used in this _
letter _ with the exact sub - horizon solutions for corresponding models .
these cases are under investigation @xcite .
this theoretical form of bias can be measured from measurements of @xmath18 and @xmath29 from galaxy surveys if we achieve enough binned data .
also a known degeneracy between the equation of state @xmath38 and the growth index parameter @xmath54 due to the evolution of @xmath39 can be broken due to this exact form of bias and can be used to distinguish the dark energy from the modified gravity .
we would like to thank xiao - dong li and hang bae kim for useful discussion .
this work were carried out using computing resources of kias center for advanced computation .
we also thank for the hospitality at apctp during the program trp .
one takes the derivative of @xmath55 using their definitions , @xmath56 and @xmath57 to obtain = [ dfsig8dz ] , where we use the sub - horizon scale equation for the growth factor @xmath12 , @xmath58 where dot means the derivative with respect to the cosmic time @xmath59 .
thus , one obtains an interesting relation between @xmath60 and @xmath40 , _
8(z ) & = & + & = & [ sigma8 ] , where we explicitly express the @xmath61 using the observable quantity @xmath29 in the second equality .
thus , if one achieves enough binned data for @xmath29 , then one can measure @xmath20 at each epoch .
for example , the present value of @xmath20 is given by _ 8 ^ 0 & = & ( ) ^-1 + & = & [ sig80 ] .
the value of @xmath62 derived from the cmb depends on the primordial amplitude , @xmath63 and the spectral index , @xmath64 . however , the right hand side of eq .
( [ sig80 ] ) depends only on the background evolution parameters , @xmath38 and @xmath30 .
thus , one can the constraint @xmath63 and @xmath64 from the rsd measurement . @xmath60 and @xmath30 are degenerated in galaxy surveys , but one can break this from the above eq .
( [ sig80 ] ) . if one adopts the definition of linear bias @xmath65 , then one obtains @xmath0 from the above eq .
( [ dfsig8dz ] ) b^-1(z ) = [ binv ] .
thus , one obtains the exact analytic solution for @xmath0 given by eq .
( [ bkz ] ) .
one can generalize @xmath0 as @xmath37 if one substitute @xmath12 with @xmath66 even for sub - horizon scales . for example , if one considers @xmath41 model or the massive neutrino model , then one can obtain @xmath66 inside horizon scales at linear regime @xcite .
o. lahav _ et al .
_ , mon . not .
. soc . * 333 * , 961 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0112162 ] .
l. clerkin , d. kirk , o. lahav , f. b. abdalla , and e. gaztanaga , [ arxiv:1405.5521 ] . j. n. fry , astrophys .
j. * 461 * , l65 ( 1996 ) s. matarrese , p. coles , f. lucchin , l. moscardini , mon . not .
astron . soc . *
286 * , 115 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9608004 ] .
m. teggmark and p. j. e. peebles , astrophys .
j. * 500 * , l79 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9804067 ] .
j. l. tinker _ et al .
_ , astrophys .
j. * 724 * , 878 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1001.3162 ] .
s. m. croom _ et al .
_ , mon . not .
. soc . * 356 * , 415 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0409314 ] .
s. basilakos , m. plionis , and a. pouri , phys .
d * 83 * , 123525 ( 2011 ) [ arxiv:1106.1183 ] .
seo and d. j. eisenstein , astrophys .
j. * 598 * , 720 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0307460 ] .
f. beutler _ et al .
_ , mon . not .
. soc . * 423 * , 3430 ( 2012 ) [ arxiv:1204.4725 ] s. lee , j. cosmol .
astropart .
phys.*02 * , 021 ( 2014 ) [ arxiv:1307.6619 ] .
v. silveira and i. waga , phys . rev .
d * 50 * , 4890 ( 1994 ) .
s. lee and k .- w .
ng , phys . rev .
d * 82 * , 043004 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:0907.2108 ] .
s. lee , [ arxiv:1409.1355 ] .
w. saunders , m. rowan - robinson , and a. lawrence , mon . not .
. soc . * 258 * , 134 ( 1992 ) .
planck collaboration ; p. a. r. ade _ et al .
_ , astron . astrophys . * 571 * , 39 ( 2014 ) [ arxiv:1309.0382 ] .
g. dvali , g. gabadadze , and m. porrati , phys .
b * 485 * , 208 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0005016 ] .
s. lee and k .- w .
ng , phys . lett .
b * 688 * , 1 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:0906.1643 ] .
r. gannouji , b. moraes , and d. polarski j. cosmol .
astropart .
phys.*02 * , 034 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0809.3374 ] .
f. simpson and j. a. peacock , phys .
d * 81 * , 043512 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:0910.3834 ] .
s. lee , [ in preparation ] .
|
many models for evolution bias @xmath0 from empirical knowledge theory simulations observations for growth merging collapsed structure bias fitting forms include unknown free parameters need with galaxy bias data simulation incorrect bias model causes shift values cosmological parameters accurate modeling to @xmath0 prerequisite for precision cosmology obtain exact linear bias from definition on cosmology gravity theory provide @xmath0 from theory observation analytic solution for bias allows as cosmological parameter instead nuisance observed linear galaxy power spectrum using fiducial model including effects bias redshift space distortions given by @xcite p_gal^(k,z ) = b^2 p_m(k , z_0 ) ( 1 + ^2)^2 ( ) ^2 [ pgal ] @xmath2 ratio hubble parameter model model @xmath5 ratio angular diameter distance linear bias factor @xmath9 present matter power spectrum redshift space distortions @xmath10 @xmath12 linear growth factor of matter fluctuation adopts definition linear bias as @xmath16 obtains @xmath17 .@xmath10 obtained from observations theories predict @xmath19 derivative of @xmath21 @xmath22 obtains use @xmath23 for @xmath21 b(k z ) & = ( z ) ^-1 + z ) ^-1 use @xmath24 observed fractional rms in galaxy number density @xmath27 @xmath28 flat universe refer appendix for detail derivation quantities in second equality of measurable from galaxy surveys @xmath18 @xmath29 measured from galaxy surveys @xmath30 measured from @xmath18 @xmath29 @xcite measure time evolution of bias if data @xmath31 future galaxy surveys provide sub - percent level accuracy @xmath29 @xcite accurate measurement of bias gravity theory derived from definition theoretical motivation for formulae of @xmath32 @xcite @xmath18 constant obtains @xmath33 magnitude of @xmath34 determined by measured value of @xmath18 on luminosity color spectral type galaxies no reason believe @xmath18 time independent regard @xmath18 as time dependent observable in eqtime evolution of bias determined from observations @xmath18 assume form @xmath35 assign dependence bias on galaxy properties into @xmath36 galaxy dependence on @xmath37 absorbed in @xmath36 cosmological dependence on bias represented by @xmath38 @xmath23 @xmath40 depends on @xmath38 gravity theory restrict consideration for linear regime solve sub - solution for @xmath13 growth factor @xmath12 model numerically solve investigate constant dark energy equation @xmath38cdm @xmath41 model generalize consideration model by solving @xmath13 numerically investigate evolution of bias for cosmological parameters @xmath38 @xmath30 under general relativity constant dark energy equation @xmath38 known exact analytic solution for linear growth rate @xmath12 adopt solution show cosmology astrophysics dependence on @xmath0 generalize time dependent @xmath38 numerical solution for @xmath12 depict dependence @xmath0 on @xmath38 @xmath30 in fig evolution @xmath0 for values @xmath38 @xmath44 @xmath46dashed dotted lines correspond @xmath47 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 @xmath38 decreases @xmath0 @xmath38 increases @xmath12 @xmath48 decrease difference @xmath0 increases @xmath22 increases difference between @xmath49 @xmath50 4.4 ( 3.5 ) % at @xmath51 show @xmath0 dependence on @xmath30 @xmath43cdm model right panel lines correspond @xmath52 0.35 0.3 0.25 @xmath43cdm @xmath30 increases @xmath12 @xmath48 @xmath0 decreases @xmath30 increases difference between @xmath53 @xmath44 3.8 ( 3.2 ) % at @xmath51 generalize investigation varying @xmath38 non - flat universe solving sub - horizon equation numerically time varying @xmath38 same cmb result @xmath38 models analytic solution for linear bias cosmological astrophysical dependence bias time evolution of bias for different models different gravity theories provide different bias consistent check for cosmological dependence on galaxy power spectrumsolution generalized to models modified gravity theories massive neutrino dark matter model replacing approximate solution with exact sub - horizon solutions cases under investigation bias measured from measurements @xmath18 @xmath29 galaxy surveys enough binned data degeneracy between equation state @xmath38 growth index parameter @xmath54 due evolution @xmath39 broken bias distinguish dark energy from modified gravity xiao - dong li hang bae kim for discussion work resources kias center advanced computation hospitality apctp program derivative of @xmath55 definitions @xmath56 @xmath57 obtain = [ dfsig8dz ] sub - scale equation for growth factor @xmath12 @xmath58 dot derivative cosmic time @xmath59 relation between @xmath60 @xmath40 [ sigma8 ] express @xmath61 using observable quantity @xmath29 second equality enough binned data for @xmath29 measure @xmath20 at each epoch present value @xmath20 given by + [ sig80 ] value @xmath62 depends on primordial amplitude @xmath63 spectral index @xmath64 right hand side of eq sig80 depends on background evolution parameters @xmath38 @xmath30 constraint @xmath63 @xmath64 from rsd measurement @xmath60 @xmath30 degenerated in galaxy surveys break from eq adopts linear bias @xmath65 obtains @xmath0 from eq b^-1(z ) = binv ] obtains exact analytic solution for @xmath0 generalize @xmath0 as @xmath37 substitute @xmath12 with @xmath66 for sub - horizon scales considers @xmath41 model massive neutrino model obtain @xmath66 inside horizon scales at linear regime lahav al . * 333 * 961 ( 2002 ) astro - ph/0112162 l. clerkin d. kirk lahav abdalla. gaztanaga arxiv:1405.5521 n. fry astrophys . 461 l65 ( 1996 ) matarrese. coles. lucchin moscardini 286 115 ( 1997 ) astro - ph/9608004 m. teggmark peebles astrophys . 500 l79 ( 1998 ) ph/9804067 l. tinker astrophys .724 878 ( 2010 ) arxiv:1001.3162 croom 356 415 ( 2005 ) astro - ph/0409314 basilakos plionis a. pouri . 83 123525 ( 2011 ) arxiv:1106.1183 ] seo eisenstein astrophys . 598 720 ( 2003 ) astro - ph/0307460 ] beutler 423 3430 ( 2012 ):1204.4725 ] lee cosmol astropart. 021 ( 2014 ) arxiv:1307.6619 ] v. silveira. waga phys . 50 4890 ( 1994 ) s. lee w ng phys . 82 043004 ( 2010 ) arxiv:0907.2108 ] lee arxiv:1409.1355 ] saunders rowan - robinson a. lawrence 258 134 ( 1992 ) planck collaboration ade astrophys . 571 39 ( 2014 ) arxiv:1309.0382 ] g. dvali gabadadze m. porrati phys . 485 208 ( 2000 ) hep - th/0005016 s. lee w ng phys .688 1 2010 arxiv:0906.1643 gannouji moraes d. polarski cosmol astropart.*02 034 2009 ) arxiv:0809.3374 ] f simpson peacock 81 * 043512 2010 ) arxiv:0910.3834 ] lee preparation
| 0.501502
| 3,288
| 1,711
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,939
|
an interesting class of background field configurations in qed are the @xmath0 symmetric fields .
those backgrounds have some instanton - like properties and yield a one - loop effective action that is highly nontrivial but amenable to numerical calculation , for both scalar and spinor qed . here
we report on an application of the recently developed `` partial - wave - cutoff method '' to the numerical analysis of both effective actions in the full mass range .
in particular , at large mass we are able to match the asymptotic behavior of the physically renormalized effective action against the leading two mass levels of the inverse mass ( or heat kernel ) expansion . at small mass
we obtain good numerical results even in the massless case for the appropriately ( unphysically ) renormalized effective action after the removal of the chiral anomaly term through a small radial cutoff factor .
in particular , we show that the effective action after this removal remains finite in the massless limit , which also provides indirect support for m. fry s hypothesis that the qed effective action in this limit is dominated by the chiral anomaly term .
= 11.6pt
|
et al _ @xcite initiated the application of the `` partial wave - cutoff method '' , to be explained below , to the important class of @xmath0 symmetric fields first introduced by s. l. adler @xcite .
we will work in euclidean metric with @xmath1 where @xmath2 is a t hooft symbol , @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
in general , @xmath5 may be any arbitrary spherically symmetric function .
however , the profile we have chosen for @xmath5 has the following important properties : * @xmath6 is finite . *
@xmath7 , which is what we need to see the chiral anomaly term @xmath8 .
according to m. fry @xcite , the following general remarks hold for the spinor qed effective action in the background ( [ defbackground ] ) with @xmath9 : let @xmath10 denote the ( scheme independent ) effective action obtained after subtraction of the two - point contribution .
it behaves for small @xmath11 as @xmath12 the logarithmic term is determined entirely by the chiral anomaly , @xmath13
after decomposing the negative chirality part of the dirac operator into partial - wave radial operators with quantum numbers @xmath14 and @xmath15 , the corresponding effective action is : @xmath16 we concentrate on the negative chirality sector of the spinor effective action where @xmath17 is the degeneracy factor , and the @xmath18 sum comes from adding the contributions of each spinor component .
the partial - wave cutoff method separates the sum over the quantum number @xmath14 into a low partial - wave contribution , each term of which is computed using the ( numerical ) gelfand - yaglom method , and a high partial - wave contribution , whose sum is computed analytically using wkb .
then we apply a regularization and renormalization procedure and combine these two contributions to yield the finite and renormalized effective action . the gelfand - yaglom method @xcite ,
can be summarized as follows : let @xmath19 and @xmath20 denote two second - order radial differential operators on the interval @xmath21 and let @xmath22 and @xmath23 be solutions to the initial value problem @xmath24 then the ratio of the determinants is given by @xmath25 in our case @xmath26 \right ) \phi_{-}(r ) & = & 0 \ , .
\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the high - mode contribution , which remains to be calculated calculated using wkb , is @xmath27
for the class of backgrounds considered here , the partial - wave - cutoff method works well for any value of the mass up to numerical accuracy . the effective action calculated as above
is finite for any non - zero value of the mass .
when we use on - shell ( ` os ' ) renormalization ( @xmath28 ) , its leading small - mass behavior contains the logarithmically divergent term @xcite @xmath29 thus for the study of this small @xmath11 regime we introduce a modified effective action , @xmath30 it turns out that @xmath31 is finite for @xmath32 , which supports fry s conjecture , mentioned above , for the case of the backgrounds with @xmath33 ( where the chiral anomaly term is absent ) . in fig .
[ fig1 ] we contrast both variants of the effective action for the scalar qed case ( see @xcite for the fermionic case which is very similar ) .
in this section we exhibit the leading and subleading terms in the inverse mass (= heat kernel ) expansion of the one - loop scalar qed effective action .
the first two terms are ( we calculated them using the worldline formalism along the lines of @xcite ) @xmath34 where the coefficients in the limit @xmath35 are , up to cubic order in @xmath36 , @xmath37 the large - mass behavior of the effective action is shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] for the scalar qed case ( see @xcite for the fermionic case ) .
in this section we show that the four - point contribution to the effective action in the `` standard '' @xmath0 symmetric background , ( [ defbackground ] ) with @xmath9 and @xmath38 , is finite in the massless limit .
this is a detail of some importance for fry s investigation that had been missing in the analysis of @xcite , although it has been anticipated in @xcite . in the worldline formalism
, we can write this quartic contribution to the effective action as ( in either scalar or spinor qed ) @xmath39 = -\prod_{i=1}^4 \int \frac{d^4k_i}{(2\pi)^4}\bar a(k_i^2 ) ( 2\pi)^4\delta^4(\sum k_i ) \gamma[k_1,\varepsilon_1;\cdots;k_4,\varepsilon_4]\ ; , \label{gamma4fin}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath40 is the worldline path integral representation of the off - shell euclidean four - photon amplitude and @xmath41 where @xmath42 is the modified bessel function of the second kind . after performing the path integral , suitable integrations by parts , a rescaling @xmath43 and the elimination of the global @xmath44 integral , we obtain ( see @xcite for details ) @xmath45 = -\frac{e^4}{(4\pi)^2 } \int_0 ^ 1 du_1du_2 du_3 du_4\ \frac{q_4(\dot g_{b12},\ldots,\dot g_{b34 } ) } { \bigl(m^2 -\frac{1}{2 } \sum_{i , j=1}^4 g_{bij}k_i\cdot k_j\bigr)^2}\;. \label{4photfin}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here
@xmath46 is the worldline green s function and @xmath47 its derivative .
@xmath48 is a polynomial in the various @xmath49 s , as well as in the momenta and polarizations .
now , the qed ward identity implies that the rhs of ( [ 4photfin ] ) is @xmath50 in each of the four momenta , which can also be easily verified using properties of the numerator polynomial @xmath48 .
using this fact and ( [ gamma4fin ] ) we see that there is no singularity at @xmath51 , and convergence at large @xmath52 .
we have continued and extended here the full mass range analysis of the scalar and spinor qed effective actions for the @xmath0 symmetric backgrounds , started in @xcite , by a more detailed numerical study of both the small and large mass behaviors . in @xcite only the unphysically renormalized versions @xmath53 of these effective actions were considered ( corresponding to @xmath54 ) , which are appropriate for the small mass limit , but have a logarithmic divergence in @xmath11 in the large @xmath11 limit . here
we have instead used the physically renormalized effective actions @xmath55 for the study of the large mass expansions , which made it possible to achieve a numerical matching of both this leading and even the subleading term in the inverse mass expansions of the effective actions . in our study of the small mass limit
, we have improved on @xcite by obtaining good numerical results for @xmath53 even at @xmath56 , and showing continuity for @xmath57 for various values of @xmath36 .
moreover , we have presented numerical evidence that @xmath58 stays finite even in the limit @xmath59 .
this fact is important in the spinor case , where it supports indirectly fry s conjecture @xcite that , for the case at hand , the only source of a divergence of @xmath53 for @xmath60 at @xmath57 should be the chiral anomaly term .
as a side result , we have proved the finiteness of the massless limit four - point contribution to the effective action in scalar and spinor qed for the standard @xmath0 symmetric background ( @xmath60 , @xmath61 ) .
+ more details and results for the spinor qed case will be given in a forthcoming publication @xcite .
99 g. v. dunne , j. hur , c. lee and h. min , phys .
lett . *
94 * , 072001 ( 2005 ) , arxiv : hep - th/0410190
. g. v. dunne , j. hur , c. lee and h. min , phys .
d * 71 * , 085019 ( 2005 ) , arxiv : hep - th/0502087 . g. v. dunne , j. hur and c. lee , phys .
d * 74 * , 085025 ( 2006 ) , arxiv : hep - th/0609118 . g. v. dunne , a. huet , j. hur and h. min , phys .
d * 83 * , 105013 ( 2011 ) .
s. l. adler , phys .
d * 6 * , 3445 ( 1972 ) ; erratum - ibid .
d * 7 * , 3821 ( 1973 ) . s. l. adler , phys .
d * 10 * , 2399 ( 1974 ) ; erratum - ibid .
d * 15 * , 1803 ( 1977 ) .
m. p fry , phys .
d * 75 * , 065002 ( 2007 ) , hep - th/0612218 ; erratum - ibid .
d * 75 * 069902 ( 2007 ) .
m. p fry , phys .
d * 81 * , 107701 ( 2010 ) .
n. ahmadiniaz , a. huet , a. raya and c. schubert , in preparation m.g .
schmidt and c. schubert , phys .
b * 318 * , 438 ( 1993 ) , hep - th/9309055 . c. schubert , phys .
* 355 * , 73 ( 2001 ) , arxiv : hep - th/0101036 .
|
@xcite initiated partial wave - cutoff method @xmath0 symmetric fields introduced by s. l. adler work in euclidean metric with @xmath1 @xmath2 t hooft symbol @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 spherically symmetric function profile for @xmath5 properties @xmath6 finite @xmath7 chiral anomaly term @xmath8 m. fry remarks hold for spinor qed effective action with @xmath9 @xmath10 independent effective action after subtraction two - point contribution @xmath11 @xmath12 logarithmic term determined by chiral anomaly @xmath13 decomposing negative chirality dirac operator into partial - wave radial operators with numbers @xmath14 @xmath15 effective action @xmath16 negative chirality sector spinor effective action @xmath17 degeneracy factor @xmath18 sum adding contributions each spinor component partial - wave cutoff method separates sum @xmath14 into low partial - wave contribution high partial - wave contribution computed using apply regularization renormalization procedure combine contributions finite renormalized effective actiongelfand - yaglom method summarized @xmath19 @xmath20 denote second - order radial differential operators interval @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 solutions to initial value problem ratio of determinants given by @xmath25 @xmath26 high - mode contribution is @xmath27 partial - wave - cutoff method works for any value mass up to numerical accuracy effective action finite for non - zero value mass on - shell renormalization @xmath28 leading small - mass behavior contains logarithmically divergent term @xcite @xmath29 modified effective action @xmath30 @xmath31 finite for @xmath32 supports fry s conjecture backgrounds with @xmath33 chiral anomaly term absent fig contrast variants of effective action for scalar qed case fermionic case leading subleading terms in inverse mass heat kernel expansion of one - loop scalar qed effective action first two terms are @xmath34 coefficients in limit @xmath35 up to cubic order in @xmath36 @xmath37 large - mass behavior of effective action shown in fig fig2 scalar qed case @xcite fermionic case four - point contribution action @xmath0 symmetric background @xmath9 @xmath38 finite massless limit detail fry investigation missing analysis @xcite anticipated worldline formalism quartic contribution action scalar spinor qed @xmath39 = -\prod_{i=1}^4\frac{d^4k_i}{(2\pi)^4}(k_i^2 ) 2\pi)^4\delta^4( k_i )\gamma[k_1\varepsilon_1_4_4{gamma4fin}{aligned} @xmath40 worldline path integral off - shell euclidean four - photon amplitude @xmath41 @xmath42 modified bessel function second kind path integral integrations rescaling @xmath43 elimination global @xmath44 integral @xcite @xmath45 = -\frac{e^4}{(4\pi)^2 }_2_3 du_4\frac{q_4(\dot g_{b12}_{b34^2 -\frac{1}{2 j=1}^4 g_{bij}k_i\cdot k_j\bigr)^2}{4photfin{aligned @xmath46 worldline green s function @xmath47 derivative @xmath48 polynomial in @xmath49 s momenta polarizations qed ward identity implies rhs of 4photfin is @xmath50 in four momenta verified using properties numerator polynomial @xmath48 no singularity at @xmath51 convergence at @xmath52 continued full mass range analysis of scalar spinor qed effective actions for @xmath0 symmetric backgrounds detailed numerical study small large mass behaviors unphysically renormalized versions @xmath53 considered @xmath54 appropriate for small mass limit logarithmic divergence in large @xmath11 limit used physically renormalized effective actions @xmath55 for large mass expansions numerical matching of leading subleading term in inverse mass expansions study small mass limit improved @xcite good numerical results for @xmath53 at @xmath56 continuity for @xmath57 values @xmath36 presented numerical evidence @xmath58 stays finite in limit @xmath59 fact important spinor case supports fry s conjecture only source divergence @xmath53 @xmath60 @xmath57 chiral anomaly term proved finiteness massless limit four - point contribution action scalar spinor qed standard @xmath0 symmetric background more details results spinor forthcoming publication v. dunne j. hur c. lee h. min phys . 94 * 072001 ( 2005 ) arxiv hep - th/0410190 phys d 71 * 085019 ( 2005 ) hep - th/0502087 d 74 * 085025 ( 2006 ) hep - th/0609118 phys . d * 83 * 105013 ( 2011 ) adler phys . d * 6 * 3445 ( 1972 ) erratum d * 7 * 3821 ( 1973 ) phys d * 10 * 2399 ( 1974 ) erratum 15 * 1803 ( 1977 ) p fry phys . d * 75 * 065002 ( 2007 ) hep - th/0612218 erratum d 75 * 069902 ( 2007 )81 107701 2010 ) ahmadiniaz huet raya c schubert preparation schubert 318 438 ( 1993 ) hep - th/9309055 schubert 355 73 ( 2001 ) arxiv hep - th/0101036
| 0.354687
| 2,294
| 1,214
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,948
|
we consider stochastic point processes generating time series exhibiting power laws of spectrum and distribution density ( _ phys .
rev .
e _ * 71 * , 051105 ( 2005 ) ) and apply them for modeling the trading activity in the financial markets and for the frequencies of word occurrences in the language .
address = institute of theoretical physics and astronomy of vilnius university , a. gostauto 12 , lt-01108 vilnius , lithuania address = institute of theoretical physics and astronomy of vilnius university , a. gostauto 12 , lt-01108 vilnius , lithuania address = institute of theoretical physics and astronomy of vilnius university , a. gostauto 12 , lt-01108 vilnius , lithuania
|
recently , we proposed @xcite and generalized @xcite the stochastic point process models generating a variety of monofractal and multifractal time series exhibiting power laws of the spectrum @xmath0 and of the distribution @xmath1 of the signal intensity and applied them for the analysis of the financial systems @xcite .
these models can generate @xmath2 noise with a very large hooge parameter .
they may be used as the theoretical framework for understanding huge fluctuations ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) and as well for description of a large variety of observable statistics , i.e. , jointly power spectral density ( psd ) , @xmath3 , signal probability distribution function ( pdf ) , @xmath4 , with different slopes , different distributions , @xmath5 , of the interevent time @xmath6 and different multifractality . here
we will present the extensions and generalizations of the point process models for the poissonian - like processes with slowly diffusing mean interevent time @xcite .
we will adjust the parameters of the generalized model to the empirical data of the trading activity in the financial markets @xcite and to the frequencies of the word occurrences in the language , reproducing the pdf and psd .
we investigate stochastic time series as a sequence of events which occur at discrete times @xmath7 and can be considered as identical point events .
such point process equivalently is defined by the set of stochastic interevent times @xmath8 .
let us consider the flow of events as the poissonian - like process driven by the multiplicative stochastic equation .
we define the stochastic rate @xmath9 of event flow by continuous stochastic differential equation @xmath10\tau^{2\mu-2}\mathrm{d}t+\sigma\tau^{\mu-1/2}\mathrm{d}w , \label{eq : taustoch2}\ ] ] where @xmath11 is a standard wiener process , @xmath12 denotes the standard deviation of the white noise , @xmath13 is a coefficient of the nonlinear damping and @xmath14 defines the power of noise multiplicativity .
the diffusion of @xmath6 is restricted from the side of high values by an additional term @xmath15 , which produces the exponential diffusion reversion . @xmath16 and @xmath17 are the power and value of the diffusion reversion , respectively .
the associated fokker - plank equation with the zero flow gives the simple stationary pdf @xmath18\label{eq : taudistrib}\ ] ] with @xmath19 and @xmath20 .
( [ eq : taustoch2 ] ) describes continuous stochastic variable @xmath6 , defines rate @xmath9 with stationary distribution and psd @xmath0 @xcite , @xmath21 @xmath22 here we define the fractal point process driven by the stochastic differential equation ( [ eq : taustoch2 ] ) , i.e. , we assume @xmath23 as slowly diffusing mean interevent time of the poissonian - like process with the stochastic rate @xmath24 . within this assumption
the conditional probability of interevent time @xmath25 in the poissonian - like process with the stochastic rate @xmath26 is @xmath27.\label{eq : taupoisson}\ ] ] then the long time distribution @xmath28 of interevent time @xmath25 in @xmath29-space @xcite has the integral form @xmath30\tau^{\alpha-1}\exp\left[-\left(\frac{\tau}{\tau_{0}}\right)^m\right]\mathrm{d } \tau,\label{eq : taupdistrib}\ ] ] with @xmath31 defined from the normalization , @xmath32 .
the distributions of interevent time @xmath25 have their explicit forms for the integer values of power @xmath16 . for @xmath33 and for @xmath34
they are expressed by the modified bessel function @xcite and in terms of the hypergeometric functions , respectively .
of the point process for word `` eye '' occurrences in the novels of jack london .
the straight line approximates the power - law with the exponent @xmath35 .
( b ) the interevent interval @xmath6 distribution of the word `` eye '' occurrences calculated from the histogram in the same novels .
the smooth line represents the integral formula ( [ eq : taupdistrib ] ) with @xmath36 , @xmath37 and @xmath38.,title="fig : " ] of the point process for word `` eye '' occurrences in the novels of jack london .
the straight line approximates the power - law with the exponent @xmath35 .
( b ) the interevent interval @xmath6 distribution of the word `` eye '' occurrences calculated from the histogram in the same novels .
the smooth line represents the integral formula ( [ eq : taupdistrib ] ) with @xmath36 , @xmath37 and @xmath38.,title="fig : " ] we consider two applications of the proposed model .
the frequencies of the word occurrences in the language depend on the content and diffuse in the text .
we consider the flow of words in the text as the steps of discrete events , i.e. , one word is the unit of the interval
. then the number of other words in between of the two successive occurrences of the same noun measures the interevent interval @xmath25 of the point process defined for the sequence of selected noun .
one can easily calculate the sequence of all selected word occurrence intervals @xmath25 and so define the realization of the point process . here
we demonstrate the statistics of the word `` eye '' in the selected novels of jack london , over 1.2 mln .
words totally .
first of all , we demonstrate that the point process , defined in such a way , has long memory as the exponent of psd @xmath35 [ fig .
1 ( a ) ] . with the assumption of pure multiplicative process with @xmath39 from the relation @xmath40 one defines the parameter @xmath38 related with the probability distribution functions . the histogram of @xmath25 distribution coincides with theoretical pdf defined by its integral form ( [ eq : taupdistrib ] ) when @xmath36 [ fig . 1 ( b ) ] .
the exponent @xmath41 of the power - law distribution for number of the word `` eye '' occurrences in the 1000 words length pieces of text is @xmath42 . as we will see later
, the presented example of the word statistics resembles the statistical properties of trading activity in the financial markets . of the stock cvx trade sequence traded on the nyse .
( b ) power spectral density of the poissonian - like process driven by eq .
( [ eq : taucontinuous ] ) with the parameters @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 , and @xmath46 .
straight lines approximate power - law spectrum with exponents @xmath47 and @xmath48 .
( c ) the empirical distribution of @xmath49 calculated from the histogram of cvx trades on nyse .
the smooth line represents the integral formula ( [ eq : taupdistrib ] ) for @xmath36 , @xmath43 and @xmath38 .
( d ) the model distribution of @xmath49 calculated with same parameters as in ( b ) , the smooth line is the same as in ( c).,title="fig : " ] of the stock cvx trade sequence traded on the nyse .
( b ) power spectral density of the poissonian - like process driven by eq .
( [ eq : taucontinuous ] ) with the parameters @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 , and @xmath46 .
straight lines approximate power - law spectrum with exponents @xmath47 and @xmath48 .
( c ) the empirical distribution of @xmath49 calculated from the histogram of cvx trades on nyse .
the smooth line represents the integral formula ( [ eq : taupdistrib ] ) for @xmath36 , @xmath43 and @xmath38 .
( d ) the model distribution of @xmath49 calculated with same parameters as in ( b ) , the smooth line is the same as in ( c).,title="fig : " ] of the stock cvx trade sequence traded on the nyse .
( b ) power spectral density of the poissonian - like process driven by eq .
( [ eq : taucontinuous ] ) with the parameters @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 , and @xmath46 .
straight lines approximate power - law spectrum with exponents @xmath47 and @xmath48 .
( c ) the empirical distribution of @xmath49 calculated from the histogram of cvx trades on nyse .
the smooth line represents the integral formula ( [ eq : taupdistrib ] ) for @xmath36 , @xmath43 and @xmath38 .
( d ) the model distribution of @xmath49 calculated with same parameters as in ( b ) , the smooth line is the same as in ( c).,title="fig : " ] of the stock cvx trade sequence traded on the nyse .
( b ) power spectral density of the poissonian - like process driven by eq .
( [ eq : taucontinuous ] ) with the parameters @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 , and @xmath46 .
straight lines approximate power - law spectrum with exponents @xmath47 and @xmath48 .
( c ) the empirical distribution of @xmath49 calculated from the histogram of cvx trades on nyse .
the smooth line represents the integral formula ( [ eq : taupdistrib ] ) for @xmath36 , @xmath43 and @xmath38 .
( d ) the model distribution of @xmath49 calculated with same parameters as in ( b ) , the smooth line is the same as in ( c).,title="fig : " ] in the case of the financial market we consider every trade of the selected stock as a point event , i.e. the sequence of all trades for the stock composes the stochastic point process , described by the set of time intervals between the successive trades .
the power spectral density of the trade sequence serves as a measure of the long range memory property of trading activity .
an example of the spectrum for the stock cvx trade sequence traded in the period of two years on nyse , fig.2 ( a ) , reveals the structure of the power spectral density in a wide range of frequencies and shows that the real markets exhibit two power laws with the exponents @xmath47 and @xmath48 . in our recent works @xcite
we have proposed the model adjustment , introducing a new form of the modulating stochastic differential equation instead of eq .
( [ eq : taustoch2 ] ) , @xmath50\frac{1}{(\epsilon+\tau)^2}\mathrm{d}t + \sigma\frac{\sqrt{\tau}}{\epsilon+\tau}\mathrm{d}w , \label{eq : taucontinuous}\ ] ] where a new parameter @xmath51 defines the crossover between two areas of @xmath6 diffusion with assumption @xmath52 . the solution of eq .
( [ eq : taucontinuous ] ) has to be scaled by @xmath17 for other values of @xmath17 . the poisonian - like point process modulated by eq .
( [ eq : taucontinuous ] ) reproduces psd , fig.2 ( a ) , of the empirical trade sequence in detail , including two exponents and the crossover point , fig.2 ( b ) .
the proposed model with the same parameters reproduces the empirical pdf of @xmath49 , fig.2 ( c ) and ( d ) , very well .
moreover , the model describes the distribution of the empirical trading activity , i.e. , the number of transactions per selected time window with the power - law exponent @xmath42 .
|
proposed generalized stochastic point process models generating monofractal multifractal time series exhibiting power laws spectrum distribution signal intensity applied for analysis financial systems models generate @xmath2 noise large hooge parameter used theoretical framework for understanding huge fluctuations description observable statistics power spectral density signal probability distribution function with different slopes distributions @xmath5 interevent time multifractality present extensions generalizations point process models for poissonian - like processes with diffusing mean interevent time @xcite adjust parameters model to empirical data trading activity financial markets frequencies word occurrences in language investigate stochastic time series as sequence of events at discrete times @xmath7 identical point events point process defined by stochastic interevent times @xmath8 consider flow of events as poissonian - like process driven by multiplicative stochastic equationdefine stochastic rate @xmath9 event flow continuous stochastic differential equation @xmath10+-1/2}{d}w taustoch2 @xmath11 standard wiener process standard deviation white noise coefficient nonlinear damping power noise multiplicativity diffusion @xmath6 restricted high values term @xmath15 exponential diffusion reversion @xmath16 power value diffusion reversion fokker - plank equation zero flow stationary pdf @xmath18 taudistrib @xmath19 @xmath20 taustoch2 describes continuous stochastic variable @xmath6 defines rate @xmath9 stationary distribution psd define fractal point process stochastic differential equation taustoch2 assume @xmath23 diffusing interevent time poissonian - like process stochastic rate @xmath24 conditional probability interevent time @xmath25 poissonian like process stochastic rate @xmath26 @xmath27.{eq : taupoisson long time distribution @xmath28 interevent time @xmath25 @xmath29-space integral form @xmath30\tau\alpha-1}\left\tau\mathrm{eq : taupdistrib @xmath31 normalization @xmath32 distributions interevent time @xmath25 explicit forms integer values power @xmath16 @xmath33 @xmath34 expressed modified bessel function @xcite hypergeometric functions point process word `` eye '' occurrences novels jack london straight line approximates power - law exponent @xmath35 interevent interval @xmath6 distribution word `` eye '' occurrences histogram novels smooth line represents integral formula taupdistrib @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 point process word `` eye occurrences novels london straight line approximates power - law exponent @xmath35 interevent interval @xmath6 distribution word `` eye occurrences histogram novels smooth line represents integral formula taupdistrib @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 applications proposed model frequencies word occurrences language depend content text flow words steps discrete events one word unit number words between two occurrences same noun measures interevent interval @xmath25 point process sequence selected noun calculate word occurrence intervals define realization point process demonstrate statistics word `` eye '' in novels jack london over 1.2 mln . words point process has long memory exponent psd @xmath35 assumption multiplicative process @xmath39 relation @xmath40 defines parameter @xmath38 probability distribution functions histogram @xmath25 distribution coincides with theoretical pdf integral form taupdistrib @xmath36 exponent @xmath41 power - law distribution word `` eye '' occurrences in 1000 words length text @xmath42 example word statistics resembles statistical properties trading activity financial markets stock cvx trade sequence nyse power spectral density poissonian - like process driven by eq parameters @xmath43 @xmath46 straight lines approximate power - law spectrum with exponents @xmath47 @xmath48 empirical distribution of @xmath49 calculated from histogram cvx trades on nyse smooth line represents integral formula for @xmath36 @xmath43 @xmath38model distribution @xmath49 same parameters smooth line same as stock cvx trade sequence traded nyse power spectral density poissonian - like process driven by eq taucontinuous parameters @xmath43 straight lines approximate power - law spectrum with exponents @xmath47 @xmath48 empirical distribution @xmath49 from histogram cvx trades nyse smooth line represents integral formula eq taupdistrib for @xmath36 model distribution @xmath49 same parameters smooth line same as stock cvx trade sequence traded nyse power spectral density poissonian - like process driven by eq . taucontinuous parameters @xmath43 straight lines approximate power - law spectrum with exponents @xmath47 @xmath48 empirical distribution @xmath49 calculated from histogram cvx trades nyse smooth line represents integral formula eq taupdistrib for @xmath36 @xmath43 @xmath38 model distribution @xmath49 same parameters smooth line same as c). stock cvx trade sequence traded nyse power spectral density poissonian - like process driven eq eq : taucontinuous parameters @xmath43 straight lines approximate power - law spectrum exponents @xmath47 empirical distribution @xmath49 from histogram cvx trades on nyse smooth line represents integral formula taupdistrib for @xmath36 model distribution @xmath49 same parameters smooth line same as financial market every trade selected stock point event sequence trades composes stochastic point process time intervals trades power spectral density trade sequence measure long range memory property trading activity example spectrum stock cvx trade sequence two years on nyse fig.2 a reveals structure power spectral density wide frequencies real markets exhibit two power laws exponents @xmath47 @xmath48 proposed model adjustment new form modulating stochastic differential equation instead eq eq : taustoch2 @xmath50\frac{1}{(\epsilon+\tau)^2}\mathrm{d}t + \sigma\frac{\tau}}\epsilon+\tau}\mathrm{d}w{eq : taucontinuous new parameter @xmath51 defines crossover between areas @xmath6 diffusion with assumption @xmath52solution of eq . taucontinuous scaled by @xmath17 for values poisonian - point process modulated by eq reproduces fig.2 empirical trade sequence two exponents crossover point fig.2 b proposed model reproduces pdf of @xmath49 fig.2 ( c ) d ) model describes distribution trading activity number of transactions per time window with power - law exponent @xmath42
| 0.433828
| 2,572
| 1,288
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,961
|
we give an example of a visual gromov - hyperbolic metric space @xmath0 with @xmath1 and @xmath2 .
|
the notion of asymptotic dimension of a metric space was introduced by gromov in @xcite .
it is a large scale analog of topological dimension and it is invariant by quasi - isometries .
this notion has proved relevant in the context of novikov s higher signature conjecture .
yu @xcite has shown that groups of finite asymptotic dimension satisfy novikov s conjecture .
dranishnikov ( @xcite ) has investigated further asymptotic dimension generalizing several theorems from topological to asymptotic dimension . in this paper
we are concerned with the relationship between asymptotic dimension of a gromov - hyperbolic space ( see @xcite ) and the topological dimension of its boundary .
gromov in @xcite , sec .
@xmath3 sketches an argument that shows that complete simply connected manifolds @xmath4 with pinched negative curvature have asymptotic dimension equal to their dimension .
he observes that the same argument shows that @xmath5 for @xmath6 a hyperbolic group and asks whether such considerations lead further to the inequality @xmath7 .
bonk and schramm ( @xcite ) have shown that if @xmath0 is a gromov - hyperbolic space of bounded growth then @xmath0 embeds quasi - isometrically to the hyperbolic @xmath8-space @xmath9@xmath10 for some @xmath8 .
it follows that @xmath11 ( see also @xcite for a proof of this ) . if @xmath12 is any metric space one can define ( @xcite , @xcite ) a hyperbolic space @xmath13 with @xmath14 .
if @xmath0 is a visual hyperbolic space then @xmath0 is quasi - isometric to @xmath15 ( i.e. the boundary determines the space ) .
so it is natural to ask whether @xmath16 for visual hyperbolic spaces in general . besides the argument sketched in @xcite , sec .
@xmath3 makes sense in this context too . in this paper
we give an example of a visual hyperbolic space @xmath0 such that @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
so the inequality @xmath19 does nt hold for this space .
we remark finally that gromov s question for hyperbolic group was settled in the affirmative recently by buyalo and lebedeva @xcite .
* metric spaces*. let ( x , d ) be a metric space .
the _ diameter _ of a set b is denoted by diam(b ) .
a _ path _ in x is a map @xmath20 where i is an interval in @xmath21 .
a path @xmath22 joins two points x and y in x if i [ a , b ] and @xmath22(a ) = x , @xmath22(b ) = y .
the path @xmath22 is called an infinite ray starting from @xmath23 if i=[0,@xmath24 ) and @xmath25 .
a geodesic , a geodesic ray or a geodesic segment in x is an isometry @xmath26 where i is @xmath21 or @xmath27 or a closed segment in @xmath21 .
we use the term geodesic , geodesic ray etc for the images of @xmath22 without discrimination . on a path
connected space x given two points x , y we define the path metric to be @xmath28 where the infimum is taken over all paths @xmath29 that connect @xmath30 and @xmath31 ( of course @xmath32 might be infinite ) .
it is easy to see that inside a ball b(x , n ) of the hyperbolic plane or the euclidian plane the path metric and the usual metric coincide .
a metric space @xmath33 is called _ geodesic metric space _ if @xmath34 ( the path metric is equal to the metric ) .
* hyperbolic spaces*. let ( x , d ) be a metric space .
given three points x , y , z in x we define the _ gromov product _ of x and y with respect to the basepoint w to be : @xmath35 a space is said to be _
@xmath36- hyperbolic _ if for all x , y , z , w in x we have : @xmath37 a sequence of points @xmath38 in x is said to converge at infinity if : @xmath39 two sequences @xmath38 and @xmath40 are equivalent if : @xmath41 this is an equivalence relation which does not depend on the choice of w ( easy to see ) .
the boundary @xmath42 of x is defined as the set of equivalence classes of sequences converging at infinity .
two sequences are close if @xmath43 is big .
this defines a topology on the boundary . the boundary of every proper hyperbolic space is a compact metric space .
if @xmath0 is a geodesic hyperbolic metric space and @xmath44 then @xmath42 can be defined as the set of geodesic rays from @xmath23 where we define to rays to be equivalent if they are contained in a finite hausdorf neighborhood of each other .
we equip this with the compact open topology .
a metric @xmath45 on the boundary @xmath42 of x is said to be _ visual _ if there are @xmath46 and @xmath47 such that @xmath48 for every z , w in @xmath42 .
the boundary of a hyperbolic space always admits a visual metric ( see @xcite ) . a hyperbolic space x is called _ visual _ if for some @xmath49 there exists a @xmath50 such that for every @xmath51 there exists a geodesic ray @xmath52 from @xmath23 in @xmath42 such that @xmath53 ( see more on @xcite ) .
it is easy to see that if @xmath0 is visual with respect to a base point @xmath23 then it is visual with respect to any other base point .
* topological dimension*. a covering @xmath54 has _
@xmath8 if no more than @xmath55 sets of the covering have a non empty intersection .
the _ mesh _ of the covering is the largest of the diameters of the @xmath56 .
we will use in this paper the following definition of topological dimension for compact metric spaces which is equivalent to the other known definitions : a compact metric space has _
dimension @xmath57 _ if and only if it has coverings of arbitrarily small mesh and order @xmath57 .
( see @xcite ) * asymptotic dimension*. a metric space y is said to be d - disconnected or that it has dimension 0 on the d - scale if @xmath58 such that : @xmath59 , dist(@xmath60 ) @xmath61 @xmath62 where dist(@xmath60 ) = @xmath63 \{dist(a , b ) a@xmath64 , b @xmath65 _ ( asymptotic dimension 1)_. we say that a space x has asymptotic dimension n if n is the minimal number such that for every @xmath66 we have : @xmath67 for k = 1,2 , ...
n and all @xmath68 are d - disconnected .
we then write asdim = n we say that a covering @xmath54 has _
d - multiplicity _ , k if and only if every d - ball in x meets no more than k sets @xmath56 of the covering.a covering has _
n if no more than n + 1 sets of the covering have one a non empty intersection .
a covering @xmath69 is _ d - bounded _ if diam @xmath70 _ ( asymptotic dimension 2)_. we say that a space @xmath0 has asdim = n if n is the minimal number such that @xmath71 there exists a covering of x of uniformly d - bounded sets @xmath56 such that d - multiplicity of the covering @xmath72 .
the two definitions are equivalent .
( see @xcite ) * the hyperbolic plane*. the hyperbolic plane @xmath73@xmath74 is a visual hyperbolic space of bounded geometry .
it is easy to see that @xmath75@xmath76 ( see @xcite ) .
we will use the standard model of the hyperbolic plane given by the interior of a disk in @xmath77@xmath74 .
let @xmath78@xmath74 be the hyperbolic plane and let @xmath79 be geodesic rays starting from a point @xmath23 and extending to infinity such that the angle between @xmath80 is @xmath81 .
let @xmath82 be the sector defined by the rays @xmath80 .
in other words @xmath82 is the convex closure of @xmath80 .
since geodesics diverge in @xmath78@xmath74 there is an @xmath83 such that the ball of radius @xmath8 and center @xmath30 , @xmath84 is contained in @xmath82 .
let @xmath85 be such that @xmath86 .
let @xmath87 let s call @xmath88 the upper arc of @xmath89 , i.e. @xmath90 we subdivide @xmath88 into small pieces of length between @xmath91 and 1 marking the vertices .
then we consider the geodesic rays starting from @xmath23 to every vertex we defined and we extend them to infinity .
so we arrive at the `` comb '' space which is the union of all the @xmath89 together with these rays and looks like this : 10.0 cm 8.0 cm
* @xmath2 . for every @xmath8 we have that @xmath88 is bounded .
that means that we define a finite number of vertices on every @xmath88 so we add a finite number of geodesic rays .
so , all the infinite geodesic rays are countable .
so @xmath92 is countable .
now a countable metric space has dimension 0 ( see @xcite page 18 ) .
so dim(@xmath92)=0 * x is a hyperbolic space with the `` path '' metric .
that is true since every pair of points of @xmath0 can be joined by a path of finite length .
also let @xmath93 be a closed curve of x then @xmath93 is a closed curve in @xmath73@xmath74 and @xmath94 .
but since @xmath73@xmath74 is hyperbolic we have the isoperimetric inequality @xmath95 so @xmath96 which means that x is hyperbolic.(see @xcite , @xcite ) * @xmath97 .
that is because @xmath0 contains arbitrarily large balls @xmath98@xmath74 for every @xmath99 .
* @xmath0 is a visual hyperbolic space with @xmath100 since for every @xmath30 in @xmath0 there exists a geodesic from @xmath23 to @xmath30 .
let s call that @xmath101 .
if @xmath101 can be extended to infinity then we have nothing to prove .
let @xmath101 be finite , then @xmath30 must belong to a sector @xmath89 .
we extend @xmath101 until it meets @xmath88 at a point @xmath102 .
then by the construction of @xmath0 there exists an infinite geodesic @xmath52 corresponding to the vertex on @xmath88 @xmath103 such that @xmath104 is less than 1 .
then obviously @xmath105 is less than 1 .
99 m. gromov , _ hyperbolic groups _ , essays in group theory ( s. m. gersten , ed . ) , msri publ . 8 , springer - verlag , 1987 pp .
asymptotic invariants of infinite groups _ , geometric group theory , ( g.niblo , m.roller , eds . ) , lms lecture notes , vol .
182 , cambridge univ . press ( 1993 )
m.bonk and o.schramm,_embeddings of gromov hyperbolic spaces _ , gafa geom.funct.anal , vol 10(2000 ) , 266 - 306 .
s.buyalo , n.lebedeva _ capacity dimension of locally self similar spaces _ , preprint , august 2005 .
w.hurewitz and h.wallman , _
dimension theory _ , princeton university press ( 1969 ) .
a.dranishnikov_asymptotic topology _ , russian math.surveys 55(2000 ) , no 6 , 71 - 116 .
g.yu,_the novicov conjecture for groups with finite asymptotic dimension _ , ann . of math .
147(1998 ) , no 2 , 325 - 335 .
j.roe , _ lectures on coarse geometry _ ams university lecture series , 2003 b.h.bowditch _ a short proof that a subquadratic isoperimetric inequality implies a linear one _ , michigan math j.42(1995 )
|
notion of asymptotic dimension metric space introduced by gromov in @xcite large scale analog of topological dimension invariant by quasi - isometries relevant novikov s higher signature conjecture groups of finite asymptotic dimension satisfy novikov s conjecture dranishnikov investigated asymptotic dimension generalizing theorems from topological to asymptotic concerned relationship between asymptotic dimension gromov - hyperbolic space topological dimension of boundary gromov argument connected manifolds with pinched negative curvature have asymptotic dimension equal to dimension argument shows @xmath5 hyperbolic group asks considerations to inequality bonk schramm shown if @xmath0 is gromov - hyperbolic space embeds quasi - isometrically to hyperbolic @xmath8-space @xmath12 metric space define hyperbolic space @xmath13 with @xmath14 if @xmath0 visual hyperbolic space quasi - isometric to @xmath15 boundary determines space to ask @xmath16 for visual hyperbolic spaces argument @xmath3 makes sense contextpaper example visual hyperbolic space @xmath0 @xmath17 inequality @xmath19 hold space gromov s question hyperbolic group settled buyalo lebedeva spaces ( x , d ) metric space diameter set b denoted diam(b ) path x map @xmath20 i interval @xmath21 path @xmath22 joins points x y i a b(a ) = x(b ) = y path @xmath22 infinite ray @xmath23 i=[0,@xmath24 ) @xmath25 geodesic ray segment x isometry @xmath26 i @xmath21 @xmath27 closed segment @xmath21 geodesic ray images @xmath22 discrimination path connected space x two points x , y path metric @xmath28 infimum paths @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 infinite ball b(x , n ) hyperbolic plane plane path metric usual metric coincide metric space @xmath33 geodesic metric space @xmath34 path metric equal metric hyperbolic spaces ( x , d ) metric spacethree points x y z in x define gromov product of x y basepoint w @xmath35 space @xmath36- hyperbolic x y z w in x @xmath37 sequence points @xmath38 converge at infinity @xmath39 sequences @xmath38 and @xmath40 equivalent if @xmath41 equivalence relation depend on choice w boundary @xmath42 of x equivalence classes sequences converging at infinity two sequences close if @xmath43 big defines topology on boundary boundary hyperbolic space compact metric space @xmath0 geodesic hyperbolic metric space @xmath44 @xmath42 geodesic rays from @xmath23 rays equivalent finite hausdorf neighborhood compact open topology metric @xmath45 on boundary @xmath42 x visual if @xmath46 and @xmath47 @xmath48 for every z w in @xmath42 boundary hyperbolic space admits visual metric hyperbolic space x visual if @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 geodesic ray @xmath52 from @xmath23 in @xmath42 @xmath0 visual base point @xmath23 visual other base point topological dimensioncovering @xmath54 has @xmath8 if than @xmath55 sets have non empty intersection mesh largest @xmath56 definition topological dimension for compact metric spaces metric space has dimension @xmath57 if coverings small mesh order @xmath57 asymptotic dimension metric space y d - disconnected dimension 0 d - scale if @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath61 @xmath62@xmath60 = @xmath63@xmath64 @xmath65 dimension space x has asymptotic dimension n if minimal number @xmath66 @xmath67 k = 1,2 n @xmath68 d - disconnected asdim = covering @xmath54 has d - multiplicity k if d - ball meets k sets @xmath56 covering has n if no more n + 1 sets have non empty intersection covering @xmath69 is d - bounded if @xmath70 asymptotic dimension 2) space @xmath0 has asdim = n if minimal number @xmath71 covering of x uniformly d - bounded sets @xmath56 - multiplicity covering @xmath72 two definitions equivalent hyperbolic planehyperbolic plane @xmath73 visual space bounded geometry @xmath75@xmath76 standard model interior disk @xmath77@xmath74 @xmath78@xmath74 hyperbolic plane @xmath79 geodesic rays from @xmath23 extending to infinity angle between @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82 sector defined by rays @xmath80 convex closure of @xmath80 geodesics diverge in @xmath78@xmath74 @xmath83 ball radius @xmath8 center @xmath30 @xmath84 in @xmath82 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath88 upper arc of @xmath89 subdivide @xmath88 into pieces between @xmath91 and 1 vertices geodesic rays from @xmath23 to vertex extend to infinity `` comb '' space union of @xmath89 rays 10.0 cm 8.0 cm * @xmath2 @xmath8 @xmath88 bounded define finite number vertices on @xmath88 add finite geodesic rays infinite geodesic rays countable @xmath92 countable countable metric space dimension 0 dim(@xmath92)=0 * x hyperbolic space path '' metric true points @xmath0 joined by path finite length @xmath93 closed curve of x closed curve in @xmath73 @xmath73 hyperbolic isoperimetric inequality @xmath95 so @xmath96 x hyperbolic @xmath97 @xmath0 contains large balls @xmath98@xmath74 for @xmath99 @xmath0 visual hyperbolic space with @xmath100 @xmath30 geodesic from @xmath23 to @xmath30 @xmath101 extended to infinity nothing prove @xmath101 finite @xmath30 sector @xmath89 extend @xmath101 until meets @xmath88 @xmath102 construction @xmath0 infinite geodesic @xmath52 vertex @xmath88 @xmath103 @xmath104 less than 1 @xmath105 less than 1 gromov hyperbolic groups essays group theory publ 8 springer - verlag 1987 asymptotic invariants of infinite groups geometric group theory.niblo.roller lecture notes 182 cambridge univ press 1993 m.bonk o.schramm gromov hyperbolic spaces geom.10(2000 266 - 306.buyalo.lebedeva capacity dimension spaces preprint august 2005.hurewitz.wallman theory princeton university press 1969.dranishnikov topology russian math.surveys 55(2000 6 71 - 116 novicov conjecture finite asymptotic math 147(1998 2 325 - 335 j.roe lectures coarse geometry ams university lecture series 2003.bowditch subquadratic isoperimetric inequality implies linear michigan math(1995
| 0.436316
| 2,925
| 1,569
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,984
|
we present first results from spices , the spectroscopic , photometric , infrared - chosen extragalactic survey .
spices is comprised of four @xmath0 arcmin@xmath1 high galactic latitude fields with deep @xmath2 imaging reaching depths of @xmath3 mag ( ab ) in the optical and @xmath4 mag ( ab ) in the near - infrared .
to date we have 626 spectroscopic redshifts for infrared - selected spices sources with @xmath5 ( vega ) .
the project is poised to address galaxy formation and evolution to redshift @xmath6 .
we discuss initial results from the survey , including the surface density of extremely red objects and the fraction of infrared sources at @xmath7 .
one of the spices fields has been the target of a deep 190 ksec _ chandra _ exposure ; we discuss initial results from analysis of that data set .
finally , we briefly discuss a successful campaign to identify high - redshift sources in the spices fields .
|
the past few years have been a watershed in our ability to directly observe galaxy evolution .
deep field surveys such as the canada - france redshift survey ( cfrs lilly 1995 ) and color - selected field samples such as that of steidel ( 1996 , 1999 ) have provided critical information on the evolution of field galaxies .
madau ( 1996 ) integrated the results at @xmath8 into a coherent picture of the star formation history of the universe , suggesting that the global star formation rate peaked between @xmath9 and @xmath10 .
since then , recognition of the importance of both dust and cosmic variance has changed the steep decline in the cosmic star formation rate inferred at @xmath11 into a flat plateau for @xmath12 ( steidel 1999 ) .
cowie ( 1999 ) also show a more gradual rise at @xmath13 than initially inferred by the cfrs .
there remain four substantial caveats regarding these findings .
first , the number of spectroscopically measured redshifts between @xmath14 and @xmath10 is small .
second , since the uv dropout technique used to identify the @xmath15 population requires them to be uv bright , it is possible that a substantial amount of star - forming activity in dusty systems has been overlooked .
third , redshift surveys from which cosmic star formation rates are measured must be of sufficient depth and wavelength coverage that star formation indicators ( , @xmath16(2800 ) ) can be measured with limited extrapolation over wide redshift intervals . finally , small area surveys , such as the hdf , are vulnerable to perturbations from large scale structure .
infrared - selected surveys provide a powerful tool for addressing these issues ( see dickinson , these proceedings ) . among the benefits , infrared @xmath17-corrections are small and relatively independent of galaxy type , age , and redshift . since the long - wavelength light of galaxies is dominated by lower mass stars rather than short - lived high - mass stars , infrared luminosities track galaxy mass , thereby providing a more direct comparison to theories of galaxy formation without relying on the poorly - understood physics of star formation .
infrared light is also less vulnerable to dust absorption . on the negative side ,
since spectroscopy is primarily performed at optical wavelengths , infrared - selected samples are challenging to follow - up .
also , since evolved stars become important contributors to the long - wavelength flux of a galaxy , poorly - understood phases of stellar evolution can make interpretation of broad - band colors ambiguous ( spinrad 1997 ) . finally , since infrared - surveys do not select for young stars , they are suboptimal for studying the cosmic star - formation history , though they provide a natural basis for studying the mass - aggregation history .
we present the spices survey ( eisenhardt 2001 , in prep . ) , a deep @xmath2 imaging and spectroscopic survey covering over 100 arcmin@xmath1 spread over four fields .
table [ tab1 ] lists the vega magnitude 3@xmath18 depths in 3 diameter apertures for the imaging .
the relatively large area mitigates the effects of large - scale structure while the @xmath19-band depth is more than sufficient to detect @xmath20 galaxies to @xmath21 .
the area and depth are a significant improvement over several recent surveys ( cowie 1996 ) , but are modest compared to several programs currently in production mode ( cimatti , these proceedings ; mccarthy , these proceedings ) .
an important strength of spices is the spectroscopic program : we currently have 626 spectroscopic redshifts of @xmath22 sources selected from the sample , approximately one - third of the complete @xmath22 sample ( see figure 1 ) .
these spectroscopic redshifts are being used to directly construct an eigenbasis of galaxy spectral energy distributions with which to determine photometric redshifts for the complete sample ( see budavari 2000 ) .
wu ( these proceedings ) discusses _ hst _ imaging of one of the spices fields .
here we discuss two initial results from the survey .
.depth of spices imaging ( vega magnitudes ) [ cols="<,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] [ tab1 ] extremely red objects ( ero s ) are an intriguing class of extragalactic object , likely associated with @xmath23 galaxies ( cimatti , these proceedings ) . we find that the surface density of these sources is elevated in the spices fields relative to some of the surface densities reported previously in the literature .
for @xmath24 , we find a surface density of 1.4 ero s arcmin@xmath25 , with a range in this value of 1.3 to 1.9 across the four fields .
for the same magnitude range and color criterion , barger ( 2000 ) find a surface density of @xmath26 ero s arcmin@xmath25 over a field of view of 61.8 arcmin@xmath1 while mccracken ( 2000 ) find a surface density of ero s in the herschel deep field of @xmath27 arcmin@xmath25 over a 47.2 arcmin@xmath1 field .
similarly , if we consider ero s defined as @xmath28 sources with @xmath29 , the spices fields have 0.13 ero s arcmin@xmath25 with a range of @xmath30 ero s arcmin@xmath25 across the four fields . using the same definition , the cadis survey finds @xmath31 ero s arcmin@xmath25 across a 154 arcmin@xmath1 field ( thompson 1999 ) while daddi ( 2000 ) find 0.07 ero s arcmin@xmath25 across a 447.5 arcmin@xmath1 field with strong clustering reported . what is the source of this discrepancy ?
one possibility is that the depth and area of the spices imaging are significantly improved over many of the surveys mentioned above : @xmath32 is a 10@xmath18 detection in the spices survey .
another possibility is large scale structure .
though the spices fields cover @xmath33 arcmin@xmath1 , larger than several of the above surveys , fluctuations in the ero surface density on these scales have been reported by more recent larger area deep infrared surveys ( daddi 2000 ; cimatti , these proceedings ; mccarthy , these proceedings ) .
indeed , one of the spices fields ( the lynx field : @xmath34 ) has a higher surface density of red objects than the other three fields .
keck / lris spectroscopy and has subsequently identified many of these red sources with galaxies in two x - ray emitting clusters at @xmath35 ( stanford 1997 ; rosati 1998 ) .
the @xmath19-band luminosity function ( klf ) at @xmath9 offers a powerful constraint on theories of galaxy formation .
since the @xmath19-band light tracks mass better than ultraviolet / optical light , the klf is more directly comparable to theories of the collapse and merging of galaxies .
kauffmann & charlot ( kc98 ; 1998 ) show that pure luminosity evolution ( ple ) models , models in which galaxies collapse monolithically at high redshift with little subsequent merging activity , predict that many massive galaxies exist at @xmath9 : @xmath36% of an infrared - selected field galaxy sample with @xmath37 should be at @xmath7 .
alternatively , their hierarchical model predicts only @xmath38% of @xmath37 field galaxies should be at @xmath7 . ignoring the spices field with the @xmath35 clusters and another field with very limited spectroscopy
, we conservatively find that @xmath39% of @xmath37 spices sources are at @xmath7 .
this assumes that @xmath40% of @xmath28 , @xmath41 ( red ) sources are at @xmath7 , as our spectroscopic program shows thus far , and we only count those @xmath37 , @xmath42 ( blue ) sources already spectroscopically confirmed to be at @xmath7
. early photometric redshift analysis on these fields suggests a value @xmath3% of the @xmath37 being at @xmath7 .
these numbers show that neither ple nor the kc98 hierarchical model correctly predicts the @xmath43 klf , implying that substantial merging occurs at @xmath7 .
the identification of two clusters at @xmath35 and one cluster at @xmath45 in the lynx spices fields has led to a deep , 190 ksec _ chandra _ map of the field .
analysis of the diffuse high- and low - redshift cluster x - ray emission are discussed in stanford ( 2001 , submitted ) and holden ( 2001 , in prep . ) , respectively . stern ( 2001 , in prep . ) discusses x - ray background ( xrb ) results from this data set .
we confirm results of recently published _
chandra _ studies ( giacconi 2001 ) : most of the @xmath46 kev xrb is resolved into discrete sources ; the fainter soft - band sources have harder x - ray spectra , providing a coherent solution to the long - standing ` spectral paradox ' ; and @xmath47% of the sources have optical / near - infrared identifications in deep ground - based imaging .
a preliminary spectroscopic program shows a mix of obvious agn , apparently normal galaxies , and , perhaps surprisingly , several x - ray emitting stars , some with hard x - ray spectra .
we are also targeting the spices fields with very deep imaging in @xmath48 to identify high - redshift sources using the lyman break technique .
this work has led to the discovery of a faint quasar at @xmath49 ( stern 2000 ) and several high - redshift galaxies out to @xmath50 .
strong emission - line galaxies have also been identified serendipitously during the spices spectroscopic campaign , the highest redshift source being a likely @xmath51 ly@xmath52 emitter with @xmath53 erg cm@xmath25 s@xmath55 .
we present first results from the spices survey , an infrared - selected photometric and spectroscopic survey .
we find an elevated surface density of ero s compared to several recent deep , infrared surveys , likely due to fluctuations in that quantity from large scale structure at moderate redshifts .
perhaps relatedly , we also find a large fraction of infrared - bright ( @xmath28 ) galaxies residing at @xmath7 . a good measure of this quantity provides a powerful constraint on models of galaxy formation .
budavri , t. ( 2000 ) , , 120 , 1588 .
barger , a. ( 1999 ) , , 117 , 102 .
cowie , l. ( 1996 ) , , 112 , 839 .
cowie , l. , songaila , a. , & barger , a. ( 1999 ) , , 118 , 603 .
daddi , e. ( 2000 ) , , 361 , 535 .
giacconi , r. ( 2001 ) , , in press .
kauffmann , g. & charlot , s. ( 1998 ) , , 297 , 23 .
lilly , s. ( 1995 ) , , 455 , 108 .
madau , p. ( 1996 ) , , 283 , 1388 .
mccracken , h. j. ( 2000 ) , , 311 , 707 .
rosati , p. ( 1999 ) , , 118 , 76 .
spinrad , h. ( 1997 ) , , 484 , 581 .
stanford , s.a .
( 1997 ) , , 114 , 2332 .
steidel , c.c .
( 1996 ) , , 112 , 352 .
steidel , c.c .
( 1999 ) , , 519 , 1 .
stern , d. et al .
( 2000 ) , , 533 , l75 thompson , d. et al .
( 2000 ) , , 523 , 100
|
past years watershed galaxy evolution deep field surveys canada - france redshift survey 1995 color - selected field samples steidel ( 1996 1999 ) provided critical information on evolution field galaxies madau ( 1996 ) integrated results at @xmath8 into star formation history global star formation rate peaked between @xmath9 and @xmath10 recognition importance of dust cosmic variance changed decline star formation rate at @xmath11 into flat plateau for @xmath12 steidel 1999 ) cowie ( 1999 ) gradual rise at @xmath13 four caveats number spectroscopically measured redshifts between @xmath14 and @xmath10 small uv dropout technique @xmath15 requires possible star - forming activity in dusty systems overlooked redshift surveys must sufficient depth wavelength coverage star formation indicators measured small area surveys vulnerable to perturbations from large scale structure infrared - selected surveys provide tool issues dickinson infrared @xmath17-corrections small independent of galaxy type age redshiftlong - wavelength light dominated by lower mass stars high - mass infrared luminosities track galaxy mass direct comparison to theories galaxy formation infrared light less vulnerable to dust absorption spectroscopy performed at optical wavelengths infrared samples challenging to follow - evolved stars important long - wavelength flux - stellar evolution interpretation broad - band colors ambiguous infrared - surveys select for young stars suboptimal for studying cosmic star - formation history basis for mass - aggregation history spices survey deep @xmath2 imaging spectroscopic survey over 100 arcmin@xmath1 over four fields table lists vega magnitude 3@xmath18 depths in 3 diameter apertures large area mitigates effects large - scale structure @xmath19-band depth sufficient to detect @xmath20 galaxies to @xmath21 area depth improvement over recent surveys modest compared to programs production mode strength of spices spectroscopic program 626 spectroscopic redshifts of @xmath22 sources one - third of complete @xmath22 samplespectroscopic redshifts construct galaxy spectral energy distributions determine photometric redshifts sample budavari 2000 ) wu discusses imaging spices fields two initial results spices imaging vega magnitudes extremely red objects ( ero s ) extragalactic object likely associated with @xmath23 galaxies surface density elevated in spices fields @xmath24 surface density 1.4 ero s arcmin@xmath25 range 1.3 to 1.9 across four fields barger 2000 surface density @xmath26 ero s arcmin@xmath25 61.8 arcmin@xmath1 mccracken 2000 surface density @xmath27 arcmin@xmath25 over 47.2 arcmin@xmath1 field ero @xmath28 sources with @xmath29 spices fields have 0.13 ero s arcmin@xmath25 range @xmath30 ero s arcmin@xmath25 across four fields cadis survey finds @xmath31 ero s arcmin@xmath25 across 154 arcmin@xmath1 field daddi 2000 ) 0.07 ero s arcmin@xmath25 across 447.5 arcmin@xmath1 field strong clusteringsource of discrepancy ? possibility depth area spices imaging improved over surveys @xmath32 10@xmath18 detection in spices survey possibility large scale structure spices fields cover @xmath33@xmath1 larger than surveys fluctuations in ero surface density reported by recent deep infrared surveys daddi 2000 lynx field : @xmath34 ) higher surface density of red objects keck / lris spectroscopy identified red sources with galaxies in x - ray clusters at @xmath35 1997 rosati 1998 @xmath19-band luminosity function at @xmath9 theories galaxy formation-band light tracks mass klf comparable to theories collapse merging galaxies kauffmann & charlot pure luminosity evolution models predict many massive galaxies at @xmath9 @xmath36% of infrared field galaxy sample with @xmath37 should be at @xmath7 model predicts @xmath38% of @xmath37 field galaxies at @xmath7 ignoring spices field @xmath35 clusters limited spectroscopy @xmath39% of @xmath37 spices sources at @xmath7assumes @xmath40% @xmath28 sources at @xmath7 program count @xmath37 blue sources confirmed at @xmath7 early photometric redshift analysis suggests @xmath3% @xmath37 at @xmath7 neither ple kc98 model predicts @xmath43 klf substantial merging at @xmath7 two clusters at @xmath35 one @xmath45 lynx spices fields led to deep 190 ksec chandra map field analysis diffuse high- low - redshift cluster x - ray emission discussed in stanford holden discusses x - ray background results confirm results studies @xmath46 kev xrb resolved into discrete sources fainter soft - band sources have harder x - ray spectra spectral paradox @xmath47% sources have optical / near - infrared identifications deep ground imaging preliminary spectroscopic program shows mix of obvious agn normal galaxies x - ray emitting stars hard x - ray spectra targeting spices fields deep imaging in @xmath48 identify high - redshift sources lyman break technique led to faint quasar at @xmath49 high - redshift galaxies @xmath50emission - line galaxies identified during spices spectroscopic campaign highest redshift source likely @xmath51@xmath52 emitter with @xmath53@xmath25@xmath55 results from spices survey infrared - photometric spectroscopic survey elevated surface density of ero s infrared surveys likely due to fluctuations large scale structure at moderate redshifts large fraction infrared - bright ( @xmath28 ) galaxies at @xmath7 constraint on galaxy formation budavri . 2000 ) 120 , 1588 barger 1999 117 , 102 cowie l 1996 112 , 839 118 , 603 daddi 2000 361 , 535 giacconi 2001 kauffmann charlot 1998 297 , 23 lilly 1995 455 , 108 madau 1996 283 , 1388 mccracken 2000 311 , 707 rosati 1999 118 , 76 spinrad 1997 484 , 581 stanford 1997 114 , 2332 steidel 1996 112 , 352 steidel c 1999 519 , 1 stern d. 2000 ) 533 l75 thompson d. 2000 523 , 100
| 0.435099
| 2,644
| 1,395
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,990
|
the na60 experiment at the cern sps has studied low - mass muon pairs in 158 agev in - in collisions . a strong excess of pairs is observed above the yield expected from neutral meson decays .
the unprecedented sample size of close to 400k events and the good mass resolution of about 2% have made it possible to isolate the excess by subtraction of the decay sources ( keeping the @xmath0 ) .
the shape of the resulting mass spectrum exhibits considerable broadening , but essentially no shift in mass .
the acceptance - corrected transverse - momentum spectra have a shape atypical for radial flow and show a significant mass dependence , pointing to different sources in different mass regions .
|
thermal dilepton production in the mass region below 1 gev / c@xmath1 is largely mediated by the light vector mesons @xmath0 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 . among these ,
the @xmath0(770 mev / c@xmath1 ) is the most important , due to its strong coupling to the @xmath4 channel and its short lifetime of only 1.3 fm / c .
changes both in width and in mass were originally suggested as precursor signatures of the chiral transition @xcite and subsequent models have tied these changes directly @xcite or indirectly @xcite to chiral symmetry restoration .
the first na60 results focused on the space - time averaged spectral function of the @xmath0 @xcite ; more details were added recently @xcite .
the present paper concentrates mainly on new developments , in particular first results on acceptance - corrected @xmath5 and @xmath6 spectra for different mass windows
details of the na60 apparatus can be found in @xcite , while the different analysis steps ( including the critical assessment of the combinatorial background from @xmath7 and @xmath8 decays through event mixing ) are described in @xcite .
the results reported here were obtained from the analysis of data taken in 2003 for in - in at 158 agev . the left part of fig .
[ fig1 ] shows the opposite - sign , background and signal dimuon mass spectra , integrated over all collision centralities . after subtracting the combinatorial background and the signal fake matches ,
the resulting net spectrum contains about 360000 muon pairs in the mass range 0 - 2 gev / c@xmath9 , roughly 50% of the total available statistics .
the associated average charged - particle multiplicity density measured by the vertex tracker is @xmath10 = 120 .
vector mesons @xmath2 and @xmath3 are completely resolved with a mass resolution at the @xmath2 of 20 mev / c@xmath1 .
most of the analysis is done in four classes of collision centrality ( defined through the charged - particle multiplicity density ) : peripheral ( 4@xmath1130 ) , semiperipheral ( 30@xmath11110 ) , semicentral ( 110@xmath11170 ) and central ( 170@xmath11240 ) .
the peripheral data can essentially be described by the expected electromagnetic decays of the neutral mesons @xcite .
this is not the case in the more central bins , due to the presence of a strong excess . to isolate this excess without any fits ,
a novel procedure has been devised @xcite .
the resulting spectrum for all centralities and all @xmath12 shows a a peaked structure residing on a broad continuum .
the same feature can be seen for each centrality bin , with a yield strongly increasing with centrality , but remaining essentially centered around the position of the nominal @xmath0 pole . a more quantitative analysis of the shape of the excess mass spectra _ vs. _
centrality has been performed , using a finer subdivision of the data into 12 centrality bins @xcite . on the basis of this analysis it is possible to rule out that the excess shape can be accounted for by the cocktail @xmath0 residing on a broad continuum , independent of centrality . for different mass windows .
right : rapidity distribution of the excess data for the mass window @xmath13 gev/@xmath14 and for three selected @xmath5 bins . the measured data ( full markers ) are reflected around midrapidity ( open markers).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] for different mass windows .
right : rapidity distribution of the excess data for the mass window @xmath13 gev/@xmath14 and for three selected @xmath5 bins . the measured data ( full markers ) are reflected around midrapidity ( open markers).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] a differential analysis in @xmath12 was originaly performed and mass spectra associated with three different @xmath12 windows , without acceptance correction , were obtained @xcite .
the na60 acceptance relative to @xmath15 as a function of @xmath12 as shown in fig .
[ fig3 ] ( left ) , implies that one should in principle perform the acceptance correction using a 3-dimensional grid in ( @xmath16 ) space .
this can lead , however , to large errors once the correction is applied .
instead , the correction is performed in 2-dimensional ( @xmath17 ) space , using the measured rapidity distribution as an input .
the latter was determined with an acceptance correction found , in an iterative way , from monte carlo simulations matched to the data in @xmath18 and @xmath12 . on the basis of this rapidity distribution ,
0.1 gev/@xmath19 bins in m and 0.2 gev/@xmath20 bins in @xmath12 were used to determine the remaining 2-dimensional correction . after correction
the results were integrated over the three extended mass windows @xmath21 , @xmath13 and @xmath22 gev / c@xmath1 . in fig .
[ fig3 ] ( right ) the rapidity distribution of the central mass window is shown for three different @xmath12 windows , exhibiting a close resemblance to the distribution of inclusive pion production , as measured by na49 for pb - pb and na60 for in - in .
the results for the acceptance - corrected @xmath5 spectra are summarized in fig .
the errors shown are purely statistical .
systematic errors arise from the acceptance corrections including the rapidity distribution used , the subtraction of the cocktail , and the subtraction of the combinatorial background plus fake matches . for @xmath23 gev / c ,
the combinatorial background contributes most , ranging from 10 to 25% for semiperipheral up to central . for @xmath24 gev / c ,
the statistical errors dominate .
the data show a significant dependence on mass , but hardly any on centrality . to bear out the differences in mass more clearly , the data were summed over the three more central bins and plotted in fig .
[ fig5 ] ( left ) as a function of @xmath25 .
the inverse slope parameter @xmath26 as determined from differential fits of the @xmath6 spectra with @xmath27 , using a sliding window in @xmath5 , is plotted on the right .
instead of flattening at very low @xmath6 as should be expected from radial flow , strikingly all spectra _ steepen _ , which is equivalent to very small values of @xmath26 . for comparison , the @xmath3 resonance , placed just in between the upper two mass windows ,
does flatten as expected .
moreover , depending on the fit region , @xmath26 covers an unusually large dynamic range .
finally , the largest masses have the steepest @xmath6 spectrum , _ i.e. _ the smallest value of @xmath26 everywhere , again contrary to radial flow and to what is usually observed for hadrons .
all this suggests that different mass regions are coupled to basically different emission sources .
summarizing , the previously measured excess mass spectra and the new acceptance - corrected @xmath5 and @xmath6 spectra present an unexpected behaviour . beyond the @xmath0 spectral
function this may lead to a better understanding of the continuum part of the spectra for @xmath28 gev / c@xmath9 , possibly disentangling parton - hadron duality .
00 r. d. pisarski , phys .
* 110b * , 155 ( 1982 ) g. e. brown , m. rho , phys . rept . * 363 * , 85 ( 2002 ) r. rapp and j. wambach , adv .
. phys . * 25 * , 1 ( 2000 ) r. arnaldi _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) , phys .
* 96 * ( 2006 ) 162302 s. damjanovic _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) , nucl - ex/0609026 ; s. damjanovic _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) , nucl - ex/0701015 g. usai _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) , eur .
j. * c43 * , 415 ( 2005 ) ; g. usai _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) , these proceedings .
m. keil _ et al .
_ , nucl . instrum
. meth .
* a539 * , 137 ( 2005 ) and * a546 * , 448 ( 2005 ) r. shahoyan _ et al . _
( na60 collaboration ) , nucl .
* a774 * , 677 ( 2006 ) r. shahoyan _ et al . _ ( na60 collaboration ) , these proceedings
|
thermal dilepton production below 1 gev / c@xmath1 mediated by light vector mesons @xmath0 @xmath0(770 mev / c@xmath1 important strong coupling to @xmath4 channel short lifetime 1.3 fm / c changes in width mass chiral transition models tied to chiral symmetry restoration first na60 results space - time spectral function @xmath0 @xcite more details added present paper concentrates on new developments results acceptance - corrected @xmath5 @xmath6 spectra for different mass windows details in analysis steps background @xmath7 @xmath8 results from data 2003 for 158 agev fig shows opposite - sign background signal dimuon mass spectra over collision centralities signal resulting net spectrum contains 360000 muon pairs mass range 0 - 2 gev / c@xmath9 50% of total statistics average charged - particle multiplicity density @xmath10 = 120 vector mesons @xmath2 @xmath3 resolved with mass resolution at @xmath2 of 20 mev / c@xmath1analysis in four classes collision centrality charged - particle : peripheral ( 4@xmath1130 ) semiperipheral ( 30@xmath11110 ) semicentral ( 110@xmath11170 ) central ( 170@xmath11240 ) peripheral data described by expected electromagnetic decays of neutral mesons @xcite not in central bins strong excess to isolate excess novel procedure devised @xcite resulting spectrum for centralities @xmath12 shows peaked structure on broad continuum same feature for each centrality bin yield increasing with centrality centered around nominal @xmath0 pole quantitative analysis of excess mass spectra vs. centrality performed subdivision data into 12 centrality bins @xcite out excess shape accounted by cocktail @xmath0 on broad continuum independent of centrality mass windows rapidity distribution of excess data for @xmath13@xmath14 three @xmath5 bins data reflected around midrapidity ( open markers). rapidity distribution excess data @xmath13 @xmath5 bins around midrapiditydifferential analysis in @xmath12 performed mass spectra three windows without acceptance correction obtained na60 acceptance to @xmath15 function @xmath12 implies acceptance correction 3-dimensional grid in @xmath16 large errors correction performed in 2-dimensional @xmath17 space measured rapidity distribution determined with acceptance correction from monte carlo simulations data @xmath18 and @xmath12 0.1 gev/@xmath19 bins 0.2 gev/@xmath20 bins in used 2-dimensional correction after results integrated over three extended mass windows @xmath21 @xmath13 rapidity distribution of central mass window for three @xmath12 windows resemblance to distribution inclusive pion production measured by na49 for pb - pb na60 for in - in results for acceptance - corrected @xmath5 spectra summarized in fig . errors statistical systematic errors from acceptance corrections rapidity distribution subtraction cocktail combinatorial background plus fake matches for @xmath23 gev combinatorial background contributes most 10 to 25% for for @xmath24 gev / c statistical errors dominatedata show dependence on mass centrality differences data summed over three central bins plotted in fig function of @xmath25 inverse slope parameter @xmath26 from differential fits @xmath6 spectra with @xmath27 sliding window plotted right flattening at low @xmath6 all spectra steepen to small values @xmath26 @xmath3 resonance between upper two mass windows depending fit region @xmath26 covers large dynamic range largest masses have steepest @xmath6 spectrum smallest value of @xmath26 contrary to radial flow suggests different mass regions to different emission sources measured excess mass spectra new acceptance - corrected @xmath5 and @xmath6 spectra present unexpected behaviour may lead to understanding of continuum part spectra for @xmath28 / c@xmath9 possibly disentangling parton - hadron duality pisarski phys . 110b 155 ( 1982 ). brown rho phys . 363 85 ( 2002 ) rapp j. wambach . 25 1 ( 2000 ) r. arnaldi al phys 96 2006 ) 162302 s damjanovic al na60 collaboration nucl - ex/0609026 collaboration nucl ex/0701015 g. usai al na60 collaboration c43 415 ( 2005 ) usai na60 collaboration proceedings m. keil et al . nucl instrum meth a539 137 ( 2005 ) a546 ( 2005 ) r. shahoyan al na60 collaboration nucl a774 677 ( 2006 ) shahoyan na60 collaboration proceedings
| 0.317898
| 1,963
| 996
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,997
|
we map the complex electric fields associated with the scattering of surface plasmon polaritons by single sub - wavelength holes of different sizes in thick gold films . we identify and quantify the different modes associated with this event , including a radial surface wave with an angularly isotropic amplitude .
this wave is shown to arise from the out - of - plane electric dipole induced in the hole , and we quantify the corresponding polarizability , which is in excellent agreement with electromagnetic theory .
time - resolved measurements reveal a time - delay of @xmath0fs between the surface plasmon polariton and the radial wave , which we attribute to the interaction with a broad hole resonance .
the interaction of light , and in particular of surface waves such as surface plasmon polaritons ( spps ) , with sub - wavelength holes in metallic films leads to phenomena such as extraordinary optical transmission ( eot ) @xcite and negative index metamaterials @xcite . in this context ,
sub - wavelength holes are important in diverse fields of research , such as nanophotonics , enhanced nonlinear optics , and biosensing , and consequently , with a few notable exceptions @xcite , experiments focus on the macroscopic consequences of the light - hole interactions .
conversely , much theoretical work has been devoted to their understanding from a microscopic viewpoint @xcite .
that is , while the models intrinsically consider scattering of light and ssps from sub - wavelength defects , often in terms of their polarizabilities , most experimental studies address collective response features such as eot spectra and their dependence on changes in sample geometry , film thickness @xcite , and hole shape @xcite .
in essence , a detailed investigation of the dynamics of plasmonic scattering remains incomplete . in this letter
, we present a systematic experimental study of the scattering of spps from individual circular sub - wavelength holes of different diameters in optically thick gold films .
we use phase - sensitive time - resolved near - field optical observations to measure the plasmonic scattering on a nanometer length- and femtosecond time - scale , determining the angularly resolved scattering amplitude for sub - wavelength holes of different sizes and quantifying the temporal dynamics of the scattering events .
we show that these results can be explained in terms of the polarizability of the hole , in excellent agreement with electromagnetic theory .
we investigate the scattering from individual holes , with diameters ranging from 50 to 980 nm , milled with a focused ion beam into a 200 nm thick gold film deposited on a glass substrate .
we launch spps on the air - gold interface by illuminating a slit in the film with either 150 femtosecond fwhm pulses or a continuous wave laser source centered at a wavelength of 1550 nm . at this wavelength , a waveguide mode is supported by holes with diameters above 760 nm .
these spps are efficiently directed towards the hole by a bragg grating that is milled into the film on the opposite side of the slit @xcite , as shown in fig .
[ fig : sample ] .
+ we measure the complex electric field of this system , at a height of 20 nm , with near field microscopy @xcite . in fig .
[ fig : example ] we present typical experimental results for a hole with a diameter of 875 nm .
+ we observe fringes in the amplitude that originate from the interference of the forward propagating spp with the scattered waves . here , the dark vertical stripes near 5 and 8 @xmath1 m are attributed to geometrical imperfections in the area of the launching slit .
the salient features of the data are reproduced by first - principle calculations [ fig .
[ fig : example](b ) ] performed using a modified version of a model presented elsewhere @xcite .
this method , which involves a rigorous expansion of maxwell s equations , both in terms of plane waves on either side of the film and in cylindrical waves inside the hole , is used to calculate the electric and magnetic polarizabilities of the hole , which are in turn used to obtain the scattered fields @xcite .
the different waves present in the scattering event are readily identifiable in _
k_-space @xcite after a fourier transform [ fig .
[ fig : example](c ) ] . in _ k_-space ,
signatures of the forward propagating spp , evidenced by the peak near @xmath2 , and the scattered wave , which emerges as a circular pattern , are readily separable .
these signatures are shown in fig .
[ fig : example](d ) , in which both the data ( thick shaded curves ) and the fits for the different surface waves ( thin dark curves ) are presented .
the distributions of both waves peak around a wave vector @xmath3 @xmath1m@xmath4 , which is in good agreement with the theoretical value of @xmath5m@xmath4 , obtained from the dielectric constant of gold at 1550 nm , @xmath6 @xcite . in the inset of fig .
[ fig : example](d ) , we show the angular dependence of the in - plane electric field distribution . here
, the outer curve represents the total integrated field amplitude while the inner curve represents the integrated amplitude that we can attribute to the surface waves .
we find these curves by integrating up to @xmath7 @xmath1m@xmath4 under the data and fits , respectively , in each direction ( main part of the figure ) .
first , we observe no angular dependence of the radial mode and attribute the slight left - right asymmetry found in our measurements to either a slightly asymmetric hole or near - field tip .
second , for this relatively large hole the amplitude content of the radial wave is about 7@xmath8 of the amplitude of the forward propagating spp . as we show below ( fig .
[ fig : size ] ) , for an 875 nm hole @xmath9 of the forward propagating spp amplitude is contained in the incident beam , and hence the amplitude of the radial wave is @xmath10 that of the _ incident _ spp . note that our incident gaussian beam is @xmath11 m width , which is larger than the hole ( see @xcite for a discussion on the scattering cross section of the hole . finally , from this data we can also estimate that approximately half of the radially scattered field amplitude is in the surface modes .
the remaining half of the radial fields have in - plane wave vectors that are smaller than @xmath12 @xmath1m@xmath4 , corresponding to radiative modes of light , which propagate upward , away from the metal surface .
qualitatively , these are seen as the regions of non - zero amplitude within the surface wave circle in fig .
[ fig : example](c ) , or in the difference between the inner and outer curves ( other than near @xmath13 ) in fig .
[ fig : example](d ) . in order to determine the nature of the observed scattered field , we consider its asymptotic form @xcite @xmath14 where the azimuthal scattering amplitude @xmath15 is given for excitation by a spp that travels along the @xmath16 direction . here
, @xmath17 is the in - plane radial distance to the hole center , @xmath18 is the height above the film surface , @xmath19 is the out - of - plane component of the spp wave vector , @xmath20 and @xmath21 are out - of - plane and in - plane unit vectors , @xmath22 and @xmath23 are the in- and out - of plane electric dipoles , and @xmath24 is the in - plane magnetic dipole of the hole .
consequently , the isotropic nature of the detected scattered field [ inset to fig . [ fig : example](d ) ] suggests that we are mostly sensitive to the contribution from @xmath23 .
this is not entirely unexpected since the contributions of other dipole components peak near @xmath25 and @xmath26 and are therefore hard to separate from the incident spp field .
however , we note that to accurately reproduce the field in all directions [ fig . [
fig : example](b ) ] the fields that arise due to @xmath24 , as well as those due to @xmath23 , are required @xcite .
we image the @xmath23 dependent electric field by filtering out the forward propagating spp mode in _
k_-space and then fourier transforming back to real - space . in fig .
[ fig : radial ] we show this field , both near @xmath27 where only a contribution from @xmath23 is expected , and in a 20 @xmath1m@xmath28 area around the hole ( inset ) . fit .
the inset shows the two - dimensional image of the real part of the electric field , and the arrow indicates the line along which the data shown in the main part of the figure is taken.,title="fig:",width=313 ] + a fit of the form @xmath29 reproduces the experimental data with @xmath30 @xmath1m@xmath4 and @xmath31 .
hence , the measured amplitude damping is in excellent agreement with the @xmath32 behavior predicted for circular waves by eq .
( [ eq : asympte ] ) , as required for energy conservation for radial propagation on a plane .
the discrepancy between the data and fit close to the hole may be indicative of the presence of creeping waves , which can have substantial amplitudes at short distances @xcite .
we can also use eq .
( [ eq : asympte ] ) to express the ratio of the scattered field to the incident field for @xmath33 in terms of the electric polarizability @xmath34 hence , we measure @xmath35 m@xmath36 , which is larger than , but comparable to , the value @xmath37 m@xmath36 calculated for a hole in a perfectly conducting film @xcite . in fig . [
fig : temporal ] we present the temporal dynamics of plasmonic scattering , showing the amplitudes of both the forward and scattered radial modes as a function of time .
fs.,title="fig:",width=313 ] + the forward amplitude is averaged over a range of @xmath38 while the scattered amplitude is averaged over a similar range in the transverse directions ( @xmath39 ) to ensure no overlap between the modes .
both amplitudes are normalized to the peak of the forward propagating spp , and the second peak of the double peak results from spps that are initially launched backward and subsequently reflect from the bragg grating towards the hole @xcite .
most strikingly , we observe that the radial wave peaks one time - step _ after _ the forward propagating spp : there is a time - delay between the forward propagating spp pulse and the radial pulse resulting from the plasmonic scattering . by averaging over the time - delay that we measure between incident spp and the scattered wave , in all available directions , we quantify this shift as @xmath40fs . while the frequency dependence of the polarizability of the hole alone results in a shift only a few fs , it is able to explain the observed shift when combined with a modestly chirped incident pulse .
that is , since the different plane waves that form our pulse scatter from the hole with different amplitudes and phases , their reconstitution into a beam results in the observed time shift .
this shift , then , represents a first measurement of the complex spectral response of an individual hole .
we study the effect of hole size on the plasmonic scattering for hole sizes ranging from 50 to 980 nm .
the results are summarized in fig .
[ fig : size ] .
( and hence the calculated scattered amplitude ) .
inset : fraction of field contained in the forward propagating spp peak , normalized to unity for a featureless film , as a function of hole size .
the vertical dashed lines show the cutoff of the lowest - order guided mode in a deep hole for 1550 nm light.,title="fig:",width=313 ] + the inset depicts the fraction of the field amplitude that is contained in the forward propagating spp mode , which we normalize to the field on films without a hole .
as expected , less energy is found in this plasmonic wave as the hole size increases and hence scatters more energy .
the main part of fig . [ fig : size ] depicts the dependence of the scattered field amplitude of the radial wave normalized to that of the forward plasmon field ( symbols ) on the hole diameter , @xmath41 .
this dependence is accurately reproduced by the calculated electric polarizability of the hole ( curve ) @xcite .
an offset of 0.017 is present in the data ( and added in the calculations ) due to measurement noise , and represents a signal - to - noise ratio of about 50 to 1 , while the error bar is mainly indicative of the asymmetry of our measurements . for the smaller holes , well below the cutoff , the field amplitude increases as @xmath42 , where the divergence from a perfect dipolar behavior is due to the finite size of the hole and the film thickness . as the hole size increases , and
in particular once the cutoff is reached and waveguide modes in the hole become accessible , the scattered amplitude begins to saturate .
we attribute this behavior to an increase in energy flow through the hole @xcite . finally , we note that the scattered amplitude peaks at about 10@xmath8 of the forward propagating spp amplitude . to summarize , we have captured the near - field interplay between the waves associated with plasmon scattering from sub - wavelength holes and mapped both their dependence on hole size and their temporal dynamics .
we show that both the hole size dependent amplitude and the time - delay of the scattered mode can be understood in terms of the calculated polarizability of the hole .
our results provide a comprehensive understanding of hole - plasmon scattering and should , in the future , allow for the optimization of the interaction between holes . consequently , the geometric properties of hole arrangements can be tuned to create electromagnetic hot spots .
these can be used to , for example , enhance emission from dye molecules , address individual quantum emitters , or create near field distributions for sensing or imaging purposes .
hence , these results have implications for a broad range of nanoplasmonic applications .
|
this work is part of the research program of the stichting voor fundamenteel onderzoek der materie ( fom ) , which is financially supported by the nederlandse organisatie voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek ( nwo ) .
de a. acknowledges support from the spanish mec ( mat2010 - 14885 and consolider nanolight.es ) .
f. lpez - tejeira , s. g. rodrigo , l. martn - moreno , f. j. garca - vidal , e. devaux , t. w. ebbesen , j. r. krenn , i. p. radko , s. i. bozhevolnyi , m. u. gonzlez , j. c. webber , and a. dereux , nature phys .
* 3 * , 324 ( 2007 ) .
|
work part research program stichting fundamenteel onderzoek materie financially supported nederlandse organisatie wetenschappelijk onderzoek nwo acknowledges support spanish mec mat2010 - 14885 nanolight.es. lpez - tejeira rodrigo martn - moreno garca - vidal devaux ebbesen. krenn. radko bozhevolnyi gonzlez webber a. dereux nature phys. 3, 324 ( 2007 )
| 0.068778
| 190
| 103
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
203,011
|
the schwinger model is studied in a finite lattice by means of the p - representation .
the vacuum energy , mass gap and chiral condensate are evaluated showing good agreement with the expected values in the continuum limit .
|
a useful formulation of gauge theories , both from the conceptual and methodological point of view , is the one in terms of gauge invariant excitations or string - like objects .
the so - called _ p - representation _
@xcite , consisting of a hilbert space of path labeled states , has been used on the lattice to perform analytical hamiltonian calculations . a cluster approximation allowed to provide qualitatively good results for the @xmath0 qed @xcite and the @xmath1 qed @xcite with staggered fermions . a description in terms of paths or strings ,
besides the general advantage of only involving gauge invariant excitations , is appealing because all the gauge invariant operators have a simple geometrical meaning when realized in the path space .
however , the computational method implemented , up to now , on a formally _ infinite _ lattice , has the serious drawback of the explosive proliferation of clusters with the order of the approximation . in order to tackle this difficulty we propose in this paper to explore the previous method implemented now on a _
finite lattice_. as a first test , we choose the simplest lattice gauge theory with dynamical fermions , the schwinger model or ( 1 + 1 ) qed .
this massless model can be exactly solved in the continuum and it is rich enough to share relevant features with 4-dimensional qcd as confinement or chiral symmetry breaking with an axial anomaly @xcite .
for this reason it has been extensively used as a laboratory to analyze the previous phenomena .
the lattice schwinger model also become a popular benchmark to test different techniques to handle dynamical fermions @xcite-@xcite .
this article is organized into four sections . in section 2
we show the formulation of the model in the p - representation .
the electric and interaction components of the hamiltonian operator are realized in this basis of electromeson " states . in section 3 ,
first , we describe the finite lattice hamiltonian approach .
second , we show the calculation of the ground - state energy , the mass gap and chiral condensate . these results are discussed in the concluding section .
the p - representation offers a gauge invariant description of physical states in terms of kets @xmath2 , where @xmath3 labels a set of connected paths @xmath4 with ends @xmath5 and @xmath6 in a lattice of spacing @xmath7 . in the continuum ,
the connection between the p - representation and the ordinary representation ( configuration " representation ) , in terms of the fermion fields @xmath8 and the gauge fields @xmath9 $ ] , can be performed considering the natural gauge invariant object constructed from them : @xmath10 where @xmath11 $ ] ( @xmath12 denote the links ) .
the immediate problem we face is that @xmath13 is not purely an object belonging to the `` configuration '' basis because it includes the canonical conjugate momentum of @xmath8 , @xmath14 .
the lattice offers a solution to this problem consisting in the decomposition of the fermionic degrees of freedom .
let us consider the hilbert space of kets @xmath15 , where @xmath16 corresponds to the @xmath17 part of the dirac spinor and @xmath18 to the @xmath19 part .
those kets are well defined in terms of `` configuration '' variables ( the canonical conjugate momenta of @xmath20 and @xmath21 are @xmath22 and @xmath23 respectively . ) then , the internal product of one of such kets with one of the path dependent representation ( characterized by a lattice path @xmath4 with ends @xmath5 and @xmath6 ) is given by @xmath24 @xmath25 where @xmath26 and @xmath27 denote a component of the spinor @xmath16 and @xmath18 respectively .
thus , it seems that the choice of staggered fermions is the natural one in order to build the lattice p - representation .
therefore , the lattice paths @xmath4 start in sites @xmath5 of a given parity and end in sites @xmath6 with opposite parity . the one spinor component at each site can be described in terms of the susskind s @xmath28 single grassmann fields @xcite .
the path creation operator @xmath29 in the space of kets @xmath30 of a path with ends @xmath5 and @xmath6 is defined as @xmath31 its adjoint operator @xmath32 acts in two possible ways @xcite : annhilating the path @xmath33 or joining two existing paths in @xmath34 one ending at @xmath5 and the other starting at @xmath6 .
the schwinger hamiltonian is given by @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 where @xmath5 labels sites , @xmath39 the spatial links pointing along the spatial unit vector @xmath40 , @xmath41 is the electric field operator , the kets @xmath42 are eigenvectors of this operator @xmath43 where the eigenvalue @xmath44 is the number of times that the link @xmath45 appears in the set of paths @xmath3 .
the @xmath46 are displacement " operators corresponding to the quantity defined in ( [ eq : phi ] ) for the case of a one - link path i.e. @xmath47 . the realization of both hamiltonian terms in this representation is as follows @xcite : by ( [ eq : e ] ) the action of the electric hamiltonian is given by @xmath48 the interaction term @xmath49 is realized in the loop space as @xmath50 where the factor @xmath51 is 0 or @xmath52 dictated by the algebra of the operators .
the different actions of operators @xmath46 over path - states @xmath53 and their corresponding @xmath51 are schematically summarized in fig.1
. -6 mm -5 mm
our method of calculation works assuming a lattice of some fixed even number of sites @xmath54 and periodic boundary conditions ( pbc ) . starting with the zero - path state @xmath55 ( infinite coupling vacuum ) , then a collection of new states @xmath56 are generated by applying successively the non - diagonal @xmath57 interaction hamiltonian operator whose action is to add or to eliminate links to to the path @xmath58 as it was described in the previous section up to order @xmath59 .
the traslational symmetry can be exploited in order to reduce the dimension of the space tacking only one representative @xmath60 of each class of translationally equivalent paths @xmath61 . the hamiltonian matrix , with all the transitions between the different states @xmath62 ,
is then built for the scalar and vector sectors and their eigenvalues @xmath63 are numerically evaluated . in order to perform the generation and recognition of diagrams ( the elementary lattice paths ) as well as the computation of transitions between them
, we resorted to the prolog language which is very suitable to carry out the symbolic manipulations .
the calculations of the ground - state energy , mass gap and chiral order parameter were performed on lattices ranging from size @xmath64 to @xmath65 and at least up to order @xmath66 in each case .
our aim is to extrapolate these results to the continuum limit : @xmath67 , @xmath68 ( @xmath69 . )
it is clear from the plots ( figs . 2 to 5 ) that the lattice results show convergence to the expected continuum values .
this convergence is , however , non - uniform and for @xmath70 large enough the plots show deviation from the continuum values although the region of assimptotic regime becomes larger when the size is increased .
it is patent that for a fixed lattice size @xmath54 the best results for the vacuum energy and the chiral condensate are achieved for order @xmath71 .
this appears to be the order at which the finite size effects are minimized .
this is not the case with the mass gap which always gets closer to the continumm value when the order increases .
_ ground state energy _ in the continuum limit
the ground - state energy density is known exactly @xcite : @xmath72 when the order increases @xmath73 tends to a fixed value . for a fixed size @xmath54 the closer value to ( [ eq : e - exact ] ) is given by order @xmath71 . the value for size @xmath65 and
order @xmath74 at @xmath75 is @xmath76 , so the discrepancy from the exact value is less than 0.05 % .
the approximations converge with considerable rapidity .
2 shows @xmath77 for orders @xmath78 for @xmath70 ranging from 0 to 100 on a lattice of size @xmath79 .
-13 mm -10 mm in order to obtain a result in a consistent way we compute the energy for two large values of @xmath70 , for three correlative large orders and for three correlative large sizes .
then , for fixed size and order we first extrapolate to @xmath80 assuming the behaviour @xmath81 .
second , for fixed size we extrapolate to infinite order assuming exponential dependence .
finally we extrapolate to infinite size assuming exponential behaviour .
the results are given in table 1 .
the error using lattice sizes up to @xmath65 is 0.17% .
@l@rrrr & & & & + @xmath82 & @xmath83 & @xmath84 & @xmath85 & + @xmath86 & @xmath87 & @xmath88 & @xmath89 & + @xmath90 & @xmath91 & @xmath92 & @xmath93 & + @xmath94 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & @xmath97 & @xmath98 + _ mass gap _ the mass gap for the massless continuum schwinger model can be computed exactly @xcite : @xmath99 the lattice mass gap is computed as : @xmath100 comparing our results with those of crewther and hamer @xcite obtained by a similar method , although they use a different representation ( jordan - wigner transformation ) , we find complete agreement for given values of @xmath54 and @xmath59 .
when we reach larger @xmath54 we observe that the value of the mass gap improves substantially .
for instance , in fig .
3 we show a plot of the mass gap for @xmath101 for several orders . as it can be seen in the region @xmath102 , the mass gap values decrease with the order and the size approaching the continuum result . given the non - uniformity of the convergence it is more difficult to extrapolate to the limit although values @xmath103 are obtained at the modest size of @xmath104 .
_ chiral order parameter _
an interesting quantity to compute is the vacuum expectation of the chiral condensate per - lattice - site @xmath105 , defined as @xmath106 , \label{eq : chir - cond}\ ] ] where @xmath107 is the number of lattice sites .
the corresponding operator is realized in the p - representation and thus we get for the chiral condensate : @xmath108 where @xmath109 is the number of connected paths in @xmath3 . to compute @xmath105 the @xmath110 hamiltonian is modifyed as @xmath111 , \label{eq : w'}\ ] ] where @xmath112 is an arbitrary parameter .
thus , @xmath105 is obtained in the standard way as @xmath113 the massless continuum schwinger model undergoes a breaking of chiral symmetry with @xmath114 where @xmath115 is the euler constant .
this non - zero value of the chiral condensate is one of the main efects of the axial anomaly . in fig .
4 we report the value of the chiral condensate per - lattice - site for lattice sizes ranging from @xmath64 to @xmath101 . fig .
5 shows this chiral order parameter for different lattice sizes up to order @xmath90 for each size .
notice that the results in the weak coupling region converge to the corresponding continuum value ( [ eq : chiral - cont ] ) as long as @xmath54 increases while for a fixed @xmath54 the value improves with the order @xmath59 till the value @xmath90 is reached .
our general proposal is to to show that the p - representation is a valuable and alternative computational tool for gauge theories with dynamical fermions . in particular , in this work , we wanted to test the hamiltonian approach on finite lattices . with tis aim , we chose the simplest model : ( 1 + 1 ) qed .
this also enables us to compare with the corresponding numerical simulations @xcite using the lagrangian counterpart of the p - representation or the socalled _ worldsheet formulation _ @xcite .
this comparison shows that , for this case of one spatial dimension , the hamiltonian method is less time consuming .
the results are very good and confirm the belief of hamer et al @xcite in obtaining with considerable accuracy the observables working on lattices of moderate size .
consequently , this procedure is appealing because one can run all the needed computations in small machines obtaining quite fair results .
|
useful formulation of gauge theories gauge invariant excitations or string - like objects p - representation _ @xcite hilbert space of path labeled states used on lattice analytical hamiltonian calculations cluster approximation good results for @xmath0 @xcite @xmath1 qed @xcite with staggered fermions description paths or strings appealing invariant operators have simple geometrical meaning in path space computational method on infinite lattice explosive proliferation of clusters propose explore previous method on finite lattice first test simplest lattice gauge theory with dynamical fermions schwinger model or ( 1 + 1 ) qed massless model solved in continuum features with 4-dimensional qcd confinement chiral symmetry breaking axial anomaly extensively used as laboratory to analyze previous phenomena lattice schwinger model popular benchmark to test techniques dynamical fermions @xcite article organized into four sections section 2 formulation model in p - representation electric and interaction components of hamiltonian operator realized in electromeson states section 3 finite lattice hamiltonian approachshow calculation ground - state energy mass gap chiral condensate results discussed concluding section p - representation offers gauge invariant description physical states kets @xmath2 @xmath3 labels connected paths @xmath4 ends @xmath5 @xmath6 lattice spacing @xmath7 connection p - representation ordinary representation fermion fields @xmath8 gauge fields @xmath9 considering natural gauge invariant object @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 denote links @xmath13 not object configuration includes canonical conjugate momentum @xmath8 @xmath14 lattice offers solution decomposition fermionic degrees freedom consider hilbert space kets @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 part dirac spinor @xmath18 @xmath19 part kets defined configuration '' variables canonical conjugate momenta @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 internal product kets path dependent representation lattice path @xmath4 ends @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 denote component spinor @xmath16 @xmath18 choice staggered fermions natural build lattice p - representationlattice paths @xmath4 start sites @xmath5 end one spinor component each site susskind s @xmath28 single grassmann fields path creation operator @xmath29 @xmath30 ends defined @xmath31 operator @xmath32 acts annhilating path @xmath33 or joining paths @xmath34 ending @xmath5 @xmath6 schwinger hamiltonian @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath5 labels sites @xmath39 spatial links spatial unit vector @xmath40 @xmath41 electric field operator kets @xmath42 eigenvectors operator @xmath43 eigenvalue @xmath44 number times link @xmath45 appears paths @xmath3 @xmath46 displacement operators quantity defined [ eq : phi ] ) one - link path @xmath47 realization hamiltonian terms action electric hamiltonian @xmath48 interaction term @xmath49 realized loop space @xmath50 factor @xmath51 0 or @xmath52 dictated algebra operators actions operators @xmath46 path - states @xmath53 @xmath51 summarized fig.1-6 mm -5 mm calculation lattice fixed sites @xmath54 periodic boundary conditions pbc ) starting zero - path state @xmath55 infinite coupling vacuum new states @xmath56 generated applying non - diagonal @xmath57 interaction hamiltonian operator add or eliminate links path @xmath58 up to order @xmath59 traslational symmetry dimension space one representative @xmath60 each class equivalent paths @xmath61 hamiltonian matrix transitions between states @xmath62 built for scalar vector sectors eigenvalues @xmath63 numerically evaluated generation recognition diagrams computation transitions resorted prolog language symbolic manipulations calculations ground - state energy mass gap chiral order parameter performed on lattices @xmath64 to @xmath65 to @xmath66 aim extrapolate results to continuum limit @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 lattice results show convergence to continuum values convergence non - uniform for @xmath70 plots show deviation from continuum region assimptotic regime larger when size increased fixed lattice size @xmath54 best results for vacuum energy chiral condensate for order @xmath71 finite size effects minimizednot case mass gap closer to continumm value order increases ground state energy continuum limit density known @xmath72 order increases @xmath73 fixed value fixed size @xmath54 closer value to by order @xmath71 value for size @xmath65 order @xmath75 is @xmath76 discrepancy from exact value less than 0.05 % approximations converge shows @xmath77 orders @xmath78 @xmath70 0 to 100 on lattice size @xmath79 compute energy for two large values @xmath70 three orders sizes fixed size order extrapolate to @xmath80 behaviour @xmath81 fixed size infinite order exponential dependence infinite size exponential behaviour results in table 1 error using lattice sizes up to @xmath65 0.17%@l@rrrr @xmath82 @xmath86 @xmath90 @xmath93 @xmath94 mass gap massless continuum schwinger model computed @xcite @xmath99 lattice mass gap computed as @xmath100 results with crewther hamer different representation jordan - wigner transformation agreement for values @xmath54 @xmath59 larger @xmath54 value mass gap improves fig . 3 plot of mass gap for @xmath101 several orders region @xmath102 mass gap values decrease with order size approaching continuum result non - uniformity convergence difficult to extrapolate to limit values @xmath103 obtained at modest size of @xmath104 chiral order parameter quantity compute vacuum expectation of chiral condensate per - lattice - site @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 is number of lattice sites corresponding operator realized in p - representation chiral condensate : @xmath108 @xmath109 is number of connected paths in @xmath3 compute @xmath105 @xmath110 hamiltonian modifyed as @xmath111 @xmath112 is arbitrary parameter@xmath105 obtained standard @xmath113 massless continuum schwinger model chiral symmetry with @xmath114 @xmath115 euler constant non - zero value chiral condensate axial anomaly fig . 4 value chiral condensate per - lattice - site for sizes @xmath64 to @xmath101 fig . 5 shows chiral order parameter lattice sizes up to @xmath90 results weak coupling region converge to continuum value @xmath54 increases fixed @xmath54 value improves with @xmath59 till @xmath90 reached proposal p - representation valuable computational tool for gauge theories dynamical fermions test hamiltonian approach on finite lattices chose simplest model : ( 1 + 1 ) qed with numerical simulations @xcite lagrangian p - representation worldsheet formulation hamiltonian method less time consuming results good confirm belief hamer et al @xcite obtaining accuracy observables on lattices moderate size procedure appealing computations in small machines fair results
| 0.437959
| 2,885
| 1,509
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.