sample_number
int64 8
203k
| abstract
stringlengths 21
17.4k
| article
stringlengths 0
18.9k
| compressed_article
stringlengths 0
10.9k
| compression_time
float64 0
0.78
| original_tokens
int64 0
3.79k
| compressed_tokens
int64 0
2.29k
| token_saving
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
201,315
|
negatively charged hadron ( ) production in au+au collisions at bnl - rhic is studied with the star experiment .
results are presented on multiplicity , pseudorapidity and transverse momentum distributions at @xmath0 = 130 gev .
|
global observables such as the multiplicity and the inclusive single particle transverse momentum ( ) and pseudorapidity ( @xmath1 ) distributions of hadrons have been valuable tools in studying heavy ion collisions .
they represent the system at kinetic freeze - out , late in the evolution of the system when hadrons no longer interact with each other , and their momentum spectra do not change further .
these final - state observables supply essential constraints on the possible evolutionary paths of the system that can help establish conditions in the early , hot and dense phase of the collision .
a discussion on global observables can be found in @xcite .
we summarize here results on the minimum - bias multiplicity , and @xmath1 spectra of negatively charged hadrons .
the star experimental setup for the first rhic run is described in @xcite .
the analysis is based on charged particle tracking in the star time projection chamber ( tpc ) .
triggering was achieved using two hadronic calorimeters ( zdcs ) in the very forward region and an array of scintillator slats arranged in a barrel ( ctb ) around the tpc .
particle production was studied through the yield of primary negative hadrons ( ) , _ i.e. _ , and including the products of strong and electromagnetic decays .
low momentum ( @xmath2 ) particle identification was done via @xmath3 in the gas of the tpc .
only negatively charged hadrons were studied in order to exclude effects due to participant nucleons .
charged particle tracks reconstructed in the tpc were accepted if they fulfilled requirements on number of points on the track and on pointing accuracy to the event vertex .
the measured raw distributions were corrected for acceptance , reconstruction efficiency , contamination due to interactions in material , misidentified non - hadrons , the products of weak decays , and track splitting and merging .
the tracking efficiency was found by embedding simulated tracks into real events at the raw data level , reconstructing the full events , and comparing the simulated input to the reconstructed output . for this analysis ,
the acceptance for tracks within the fiducial volume having greater than 0.3 is found to be 95% .
the tracking efficiency is found to be between 7095% , depending on the particle and the total multiplicity of the event .
75 mm figure [ fig : hminus ] shows the multiplicity distribution for minimum - bias au+au collisions with @xmath4 and @xmath5 .
the data were normalized assuming a total hadronic inelastic cross section of 7.2 barn for au+au collisions at = 130 gev , derived from glauber model calculations @xcite .
the systematic error on the vertical scale is estimated to be 10% and is dominated by uncertainties of the total hadronic cross - section and the shape at low @xmath6 .
the systematic error of 6% on the horizontal scale is depicted by horizontal error bars on a few data points .
the shape of the distribution is dominated by the collision geometry : large cross section at low multiplicity , corresponding to large impact parameter , followed by a region of slowly falling cross section over a wide range of multiplicity as the nuclei overlap , and a rapid decrease for near head - on collisions , where the shape is determined by fluctuations in the collision geometry and particle production process given the finite detector acceptance .
the distribution for the 5% most central collisions ( 360 mbarn ) , defined via zdc coincidence , is shown as the shaded area in fig .
[ fig : hminus ] .
figure [ fig : pt ] , upper panel , shows the distribution for the 5% most central collisions at midrapidity ( @xmath7 ) .
only statistical errors are shown ; the systematic errors are estimated to be below 6% .
the data are fit by a power - law function of the form @xmath8 . as reference data sets ,
we also show the -distribution of negatively charged hadrons for central pb+pb collisions at = 17 gev from na49 @xcite and for minimum - bias collisions at = 200 gev from ua1 @xcite , fitted with the same function .
the ua1 invariant cross - section @xmath9 reported in ref .
@xcite was scaled by @xmath10 , where @xmath11 mb . the spectrum measured by star reflects a systematic increase in compared to that from both central a+a collisions at much lower energy ( na49 ) and collisions at a comparable energy ( ua1 ) .
80 mm the lower panel of fig .
[ fig : pt ] shows the ratio of the star and ua1 -distributions .
since the ua1 distribution is measured at = 200 gev , the invariant cross - section in each -bin is scaled by two factors for a quantitative comparison to the star data : _ ( i ) _
@xmath12 , the -dependent ratio of the yields in collisions at = 130 and 200 gev , and _
( ii ) _ = 26 mb@xmath13 , the nuclear overlap integral @xcite for the 5% most central au+au collisions . see @xcite for further details .
there are two simple predictions for the scaled ratio .
the study of lower energy collisions has shown that the total pion yield due to soft ( low ) processes scales as the number of participants , i.e. , `` wounded '' nucleons ( ) in the collision , ( e.g. @xcite ) . the scaled ratio in this case is 0.164 assuming 172 participant pairs @xcite and a mean number of binary collisions ( ) of @xmath14 for the 5% most central au+au events .
we assume @xmath15 mb for collisions at @xmath16 gev . if hadron production is due to hard ( high ) processes and there are no nuclear - specific effects ( see below ) , the hadron yield will scale as , which is proportional to the nuclear overlap integral . in this case
the value of the ratio is unity .
there are important nuclear effects which should alter the scaling from these simple predictions , including _
e.g. _ initial state multiple scattering @xcite , jet quenching @xcite , and radial flow @xcite .
each of these exhibits characteristic features as a function of and system size .
the scaled ratio shows a strong dependence , starting close to scaling at low and approaching scaling , not reaching the latter in the measured range even including the errors from the @xmath12 and scaling shown in gray .
this behaviour is consistent with the presence of radial flow , as well as the onset of hard scattering contributions and initial state multiple scattering with rising .
the shape of the distribution at higher is discussed in @xcite .
the density at midrapidity for @xmath17 and @xmath7 is @xmath18 .
extrapolation to @xmath19 = 0 yields @xmath20 . assuming an average of 172 participant pairs per central au+au collision
, this corresponds to @xmath21 per participant nucleon pair per unit of pseudorapidity .
this is a 35% increase over collisions at the same energy @xcite .
comparison with central collisions at sps @xcite shows an increase in the yield per participant of @xmath22 49% at rhic .
[ fig : etacent ] shows the centrality dependence of the @xmath1 distribution .
one sees the expected rise in particle yield with collision centrality .
preliminary analysis shows very little difference in the shape of the distribution at midrapidity with increasing centrality . using again a power - law fit to the spectra we obtain which is shown in fig .
[ fig : meanptcent ] as a function of centrality .
errors on the horizontal scale are systematic .
we see an increase in of 15% from the most peripheral to the most central events .
the values for the ua1 and na49 reference data sets are also shown .
we have presented preliminary results on charged particle production at rhic .
we find @xmath23 per participant in central collisions at = 130 gev increases by 35% relative to and 49% compared to nuclear collisions at = 17 gev . the distribution is harder than that of the reference systems for the region up to 2 , with the most central events having the highest .
scaling of produced particle yield with number of participants shows a strong dependence on , with wounded nucleon scaling achieved only at the lowest measured .
99 k. j. eskola , these proceedings .
see also j .-
blaizot , nucl .
a * 661 * , 3c ( 1999 ) .
f. retire , these proceedings .
ackermann _ et al .
_ , nucl .
a * 661 * , 681c ( 1999 ) .
baltz , c. chasman , and s.n .
white , nucl .
a * 417 * , 1 ( 1998 ) .
d. kharzeev and m. nardi , phys .
b * 507 * 121 ( 2001 ) nucl - th/0012025 .
h. appelshuser _ et al .
_ , phys .
lett . * 82 * , 2471 ( 1999 ) . c. albajar
b * 355 * , 261 ( 1990 ) .
dunlop , these proceedings .
k. j. eskola , k. kajantie , and j. lindfors , nucl .
b * 323 * , 37 ( 1989 ) .
d. antreasyan , phys .
d * 19 * , 764 ( 1979 ) .
wang , phys .
c * 58 * , 2321 ( 1998 ) .
p. f. kolb , j. sollfrank , and u. heinz , phys .
c * 62 * , 054909 ( 2000 ) .
et al . _ , z. phys .
c * 33 * , 1 ( 1986 ) .
|
observables multiplicity particle transverse momentum pseudorapidity distributions of hadrons valuable heavy ion collisions represent system at kinetic freeze - out late evolution hadrons no longer interact momentum spectra change final observables supply constraints on evolutionary paths establish conditions in early hot dense phase collision discussion on observables in @xcite summarize results on minimum - bias multiplicity @xmath1 spectra of negatively charged hadrons star experimental setup for first rhic run described in @xcite analysis based on charged particle tracking star time projection chamber triggering using two hadronic calorimeters scintillator slats particle production studied through yield primary negative hadrons products of strong electromagnetic decays low momentum @xmath2 particle identification via @xmath3 negatively charged hadrons studied exclude effects participant nucleons charged particle tracks accepted if requirements number points pointing accuracy vertex measured raw distributions corrected for acceptance reconstruction efficiency contamination misidentified non - hadrons products of weak decays track splitting mergingtracking efficiency found embedding simulated tracks into events reconstructing events comparing acceptance for tracks fiducial volume greater than 0.3 95% tracking efficiency between 7095% depending on particle total multiplicity event figure shows multiplicity distribution for minimum - bias au+au collisions with @xmath4 @xmath5 data normalized total hadronic inelastic cross section 7.2 barn for au+au collisions at = 130 gev from model calculations systematic error on vertical scale 10% dominated by uncertainties of total hadronic cross - section shape at low @xmath6 systematic error 6% on horizontal scale by horizontal error bars on data points shape distribution dominated by collision geometry large cross section at low multiplicity slowly falling cross section rapid decrease for near head - on collisions by collision geometry particle production process distribution for 5% most central collisions shown as shaded area in fig distribution 5% most central collisions at midrapidity ( statistical errors shown systematic errors below 6% data fit by power - law function of form @xmath8reference data sets show -distribution negatively charged hadrons central pb+pb collisions 17 gev from na49 @xcite minimum - bias collisions 200 gev from ua1 @xcite ua1 invariant cross - section @xmath9 scaled by @xmath10 @xmath11 mb spectrum measured star reflects increase central a+a collisions lower energy na49 comparable energy ua1 lower panel fig shows ratio star ua1 -distributions ua1 distribution measured 200 gev invariant cross - section scaled by two factors data @xmath12 -dependent ratio yields collisions 130 200 gev 26 mb@xmath13 nuclear overlap integral @xcite 5% most central au+au collisions two predictions for scaled ratio lower energy collisions total pion yield processes scales as number participants wounded nucleons collision scaled ratio 0.164 assuming 172 participant pairs @xcite mean number binary collisions @xmath14 5% most central au+au events @xmath15 mb for collisions at @xmath16 gev if hadron production due to hard high processes no nuclear - specific effects hadron yield proportional to nuclear overlap integral value ratio is unity nuclear effects alter scaling initial state multiple scattering jet quenching radial flow characteristic features system size scaled ratio shows dependence starting low approaching not reaching errors from @xmath12 scaling gray consistent with radial flow hard scattering initial state multiple scattering rising shape distribution at higher discussed in @xcite density at midrapidity for @xmath17 @xmath7 is @xmath18 extrapolation to @xmath19 = 0 yields @xmath20 average 172 participant pairs per collision corresponds to @xmath21 per pair per unit pseudorapidity 35% increase over collisions same energy @xcite collisions increase yield per participant of @xmath22 49% at rhic centrality dependence @xmath1 distribution expected rise in particle yield with collision centrality shows little difference distribution at midrapidity with increasing centrality power - law fit spectra function of centrality errors on horizontal scale systematic increase 15% from peripheral to central events values for ua1 na49 reference data sets shown preliminary results on charged particle production at rhicparticipant central collisions 130 gev increases 35% 49% nuclear collisions 17 gev distribution harder reference systems region 2 central events highest particle yield participants dependence wounded nucleon scaling lowest j eskola proceedings blaizot nucl 661 * 3c ( 1999 ) retire proceedings ackermann nucl a 661 681c ( 1999 ) baltz chasman white nucl * 417 * 1 1998 ) kharzeev nardi phys . b * 507 * 121 ( 2001 )/0012025 appelshuser . 82 * 2471 ( 1999 ) albajar 355 * 261 ( 1990 ) dunlop proceedings eskola kajantie lindfors nucl b * 323 * 37 ( 1989 ) antreasyan phys . * 19 * 764 ( 1979 ) wang phys 58 * 2321 ( 1998 ) kolb sollfrank heinz phys 62 * 054909 ( 2000 ) al phys . 33 * 1 ( 1986 )
| 0.320608
| 2,189
| 1,074
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,323
|
the airy transform is an ideally suited tool to treat problem in classical and quantum optics .
even though the relevant mathematical aspects have been thoroughly investigated , the possibility it offers are wide and some aspects , as the link with special functions and polynomials , still contains unexplored aspects . in this note
we will show that the so called airy polynomials are essentially the third order hermite polynomials .
we will also prove that this identification opens the possibility of developing new conjectures on the properties of this family of polynomials .
|
the theory of ordinary and generalized hermite polynomials has largely benefited of the operational formalism .
the two variable hermite - kamp de frit polynomials @xcite can be defined using the following identity @xcite : @xmath0 which involves the action of an exponential operator , containing a second order derivative , on a monomial .
the explicit form of the polynomials @xmath1 can be obtained by means of a straightforward expansion of the exponential in eq . , which yields : @xmath2 } \ , \frac{x^{n - 2r}\,y^r}{(n - 2r)!\,r!}\;,\ ] ] where
the variables @xmath3 independent each other as a parameter , the standard hermite form are recovered by the identities @xmath4 and @xmath5 . ] . by keeping , therefore , the derivative of both sides of eq . with respect to @xmath6 ,
we find that the hermite polynomials can be viewed as the solution of the following heat equation @xmath7 for @xmath8 they can be written in terms of the gauss - weierstrass transform @xcite : @xmath9 which is a standard mean of solutions for the heat type problems . the higher order hermite polynomials @xcite , widely exploited in combinatorial quantum field theory @xcite , can be expressed as a generalization of the operational identity , and indeed they write , denoting the order of the polynomials , is omitted for hermite polynomials of order 2 . ]
@xmath10 } \ , \frac{x^{n - mr}\,y^r}{(n - mr)!\,r!}\;.\ ] ] therefore , we can ask whether an integral transform , a sort of generalization of the gauss - weierstrass transform , also holds for the higher order case .
we start discussing the case of hermite polynomials of even order with negative values of the @xmath6 parameter , namely : @xmath11 we express this family of polynomials in terms of a suitable transform following the procedure , put forward in @xcite , which considers the operator function @xmath12 where @xmath13 is a function admitting a fourier transform @xmath14 . with this assumption
we find that the operator @xmath15 can be written as : @xmath16 and , therefore , we can express the action of the operator @xmath15 on a given function @xmath17 as the integral transform indicated below @xmath18 we can now apply the same procedure to express the exponential operator intervening in the definition of @xmath19 ( see eq . ) , thus obtaining the following integral transform yielding the even order hermite polynomials @xmath20{|y|}\right)^n\ ] ] with @xmath21 which is motivated by the the request that the integrals defining @xmath22 is convergent .
] , after a redefinition of the variable , can also be written as @xmath23{|y|}}\ , \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}\xi\ , \xi^n \,\tilde{e}_{2p}\ , \left(\frac{x - \xi}{\imath \sqrt[2p]{|y|}}\right)\;.\ ] ] it must remarked that the same procedure , applied to the case @xmath24 , does not lead to a gauss - weierstrass transform as in eq . , which holds only for @xmath25 . in the next section
we will extend the formalism developed in these introductory remarks , and prove that the airy transform and the associated polynomials can be framed within the same context .
the higher order hermite polynomials satisfy the following recurrences @xcite : @xmath26 with the combination of the first and third recurrences yielding @xmath27 therefore , the higher order hermite polynomials satisfy a generalized heat equation , and this justifies the operational definition given in eq . .
furthermore , by interpreting @xmath6 as a parameter , we can use the first two recurrences to prove tha they satisfy the @xmath28-th order ode : @xmath29 in the previous section we have considered even order hermite polynomials only . here
we will discuss the third order case and their important relationship with the airy transform and the airy polynomials @xcite . before getting into this specific aspect of the problem
, we note that the following identity holds : @xmath30{\lambda } xt}\ , ai(t)\;,\ ] ] where @xmath31 is the airy function @xcite .
let us now consider the third order pde @xmath32 whose formal solution writes @xmath33 by applying the identity given in eq . , and by limiting ourselves to the case @xmath8 , we find : @xmath34{3}}\ , \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}k\ , ai\left(\frac{k}{\sqrt[3]{3}}\right)\ , \mathrm{e}^{\sqrt[3]{y } k \partial_x}\ , f(x ) \nonumber \\
\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{3}}\ , \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}k\ , ai\left(\frac{k}{\sqrt[3]{3}}\right)\ , f(x + \sqrt[3]{y } k ) \nonumber \\
\!\!&=&\!\ !
\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{3 y}}\ , \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}\xi\ , ai\left(- \frac{x - \xi}{\sqrt[3]{3 y}}\right)\ , f(\xi)\ ; , \qquad \qquad ( y > 0)\end{aligned}\ ] ] which is recognized as the airy transform of the function @xmath13 .
the concept of the airy transform was introduced in ref .
@xcite , and has found noticeable applications in classical and quantum physics @xcite .
the airy transform of a monomial , namely @xmath35{3 y}}\ , \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}\xi\ , ai\left(- \frac{x - \xi}{\sqrt[3]{3 y}}\right)\ , \xi^n\ ; , \qquad \qquad ( y > 0)\ ] ] has been defined as airy polynomials @xcite , but , according to the discussion of the previous section , they are also recognized as the third order hermite polynomials @xmath36 .
the characteristic recurrences ( specialized to the case @xmath37 ) , can also be directly inferred from eq . .
for further convenience we will introduce the following two variable extension of the airy functions @xmath38 that , in terms of the ordinary airy function writes @xmath39{3y}}\,ai\left(\frac{x}{\sqrt[3]{3y}}\right)\;.\ ] ] it is also easily shown that it satisfies the ode @xmath40 and that any other function linked to @xmath41 by @xmath42 satisfies the ode @xmath43 \,=\,0\ ] ] which on account of the identity @xmath44 can be written as @xmath45 if we assume @xmath46 , @xmath47 , and @xmath48 , we get the following generalization of the airy function @xmath49 satisfying the ode @xmath50 as an example a comparison between the ordinary airy function and its generalization of order 7 is shown in fig .
[ fig : aicmp ] the point of view developed in sec .
2 can be generalized to the case with @xmath51 .
we consider the generalized hermite polynomials of odd order ( @xmath52 ) and note that the same procedure exploited in the previous sections leads to the following integral representation @xmath53{(2p + 1 ) |y|}}\ , \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}\xi\ , ai^{(2p + 1 ) } \left(\frac{\xi - x}{\sqrt[2p + 1]{(2p + 1 ) |y|}}\right)\,\xi^n\;,\ ] ] the use of a further variable or parameter in the theory of special functions and/or polynomials offers a further degree of freedom , which may be helpful to derive new properties , otherwise hidden by the loose of symmetry deriving from the fact that a specific choice of the variable has been done .
this is indeed the case of the hermite polynomials , which acquire a complete new flavor by the use of the @xmath6 variable and the case of the airy function given in eq . which is easily shown to be the natural solution of the pde @xmath54 and the translation property @xmath55 according to eq .
, we can write the solution of the equation @xmath56 as follows @xmath57 it is evident that the further generalization @xmath58 satisfies a higher order heat equation and can be exploited to obtain the solution of the same family of equation in terms of an appropriate integral transform . before concluding this note let us consider the following schrdinger equation @xmath59 describing the motion of a particle in a linear potential ( @xmath60 is a constant with the dimension of a force ) .
this equation can be written in the more convenient form @xmath61 where has the dimensions of a squared length and @xmath62 of an inverse cube length , so that @xmath63 has the dimensions of a length . ]
@xmath64 as discussed in refs . @xcite
, the previous equation can be treated using different means , a very simple solution being offered by the use of the following auxiliary function : @xmath65 which satisfies the equation @xmath66 the solution of eq . can therefore be written as @xmath67 where the operator @xmath68 , once written in an integral form , is recognized as the airy transform .
the solution of the equation @xmath69 can be obtained in an analogous way , and it is given by @xmath70 where the operator @xmath71 can be expressed in terms of integral transforms , linked to the higher order airy functions discussed in these sections .
further examples of generalization of the airy function are due to watson @xcite , who introduced a complete class of functions with interesting properties for physical applications . as an example we consider the function expressed as @xmath72 which is compared to the ordinary airy function in fig .
[ fig : wacmp ] , and satisfies the ode the use of the unitary transformation @xmath74 shows that it can be associated to the first ode @xmath75 the transformation has removed the second order derivative and has simplified the underlying group of symmetry , which has been reduced from @xmath76 to the dilatation group .
we have mentioned this example because it may open a new interesting point of view to schrdinger type equations involving quadratic potentials . before concluding this paper we discuss whether the airy polynomials can be exploited to obtain a series expansion of a given function .
the problems associated with the orthogonal properties of ordinary and higher order hermite polynomials has been thoroughly considered in a previous publications ( see refs .
@xcite ) ; here we will use the point of view developed in ref .
we consider indeed the following expansion @xmath77 and we will show that the use of the operational tools developed in this paper provides , in a fairly natural way , the coefficients @xmath78 , and we will display the orthogonal properties of this family of polynomials . on account of the definition of the higher orders hermite polynomials ( see eq . ) , eq . yields : @xmath79 the use of the identity allows to specify the action of the exponential operator on the function @xmath13 as : @xmath80{3 |y|}}\,\int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}\xi\ , ai\left(- \frac{x - \xi}{\sqrt[3]{3 |y|}}\right)\,f(\xi ) \,=\ , \sum_{n = 0}^\infty\,a_n\,x^n\;,\ ] ] and the insertion of the explicit expression of the airy function ( see eq . ) yields : @xmath80{3 |y|}}\,\frac{1}{2 \pi}\,\int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}\xi\ , \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}t\,\exp{\left\{\frac{\imath}{3}\,t^3\,+\,\imath\ , \frac{\xi - x}{\sqrt[3]{3 |y|}}\,t\right\}}\,f(\xi ) \,=\ , \sum_{n = 0}^\infty\,a_n\,x^n\;.\ ] ] the expansion of the @xmath81-dependent part of the exponential on the lhs of the previous equation yields : @xmath82{3 |y|}}\,\int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ , \mathrm{d}t\ , f(\xi)\,\partial_\xi^n\,ai\left(\frac{\xi}{\sqrt[3]{3 |y|}}\right)\;,\ ] ] which holds only if the integral on the rhs of this equation converges . in these concluding remarks
we have touched on several problems , which are worth to be explored thoroughly .
the link between the watson and the @xmath83 functions , the possibility of obtaining more general airy - type transforms and their relevance to bell - type polynomials , and a more rigorous formulation of the orthogonality properties of the airy polynomials will be the topic of a forthcoming investigation .
g. dattoli and e. sabia , `` the binomial transform '' , submitted to journal of integral transforms and special functions .
o. valle and m. soares , _ airy functions and application to physics _ , world scientific , london ( 2004 ) .
|
theory of hermite polynomials benefited operational formalism two variable hermite - kamp de frit polynomials @xcite defined identity : @xmath0 action exponential operator second order derivative on monomial explicit form polynomials @xmath1 obtained expansion of exponential in eq yields : @xmath2{x^{n - 2r}^r - 2r variables @xmath3 independent standard hermite form recovered by identities @xmath4 and @xmath5 derivative of both sides of eq @xmath6 hermite polynomials solution of heat equation @xmath7 @xmath8 written gauss - weierstrass transform @xcite : @xmath9 standard mean solutions for heat type problems higher order hermite polynomials @xcite in combinatorial quantum field theory expressed as generalization of operational identity omitted for hermite polynomials order 2 @xmath10^{n - mr}^r - integral transform gauss - weierstrass transform holds for higher order casediscussing hermite polynomials even order with negative values @xmath6 parameter @xmath11 express polynomials suitable transform following procedure @xcite considers operator function @xmath12 @xmath13 function admitting fourier transform @xmath14 operator @xmath15 written as @xmath16 express action operator @xmath15 on function @xmath17 as integral transform below @xmath18 apply same procedure express exponential operator intervening definition @xmath19 see eq . ) obtaining integral transform yielding even order hermite polynomials @xmath20{|y|}\right)^n @xmath21 motivated request integrals defining @xmath22 convergent after redefinition variable written as @xmath23{|y|}}\infty -\xi}{[2p]{|y|}} same procedure applied case @xmath24 not lead to gauss - weierstrass transform eq . holds only for @xmath25 next section extend formalism prove airy transform associated polynomials framed same contexthigher order hermite polynomials satisfy recurrences @xcite : @xmath26 yielding @xmath27 satisfy generalized heat equation justifies operational definition eq . interpreting @xmath6 parameter first two recurrences satisfy @xmath28-th order ode : @xmath29 considered even order hermite polynomials discuss third order case relationship with airy transform polynomials @xcite identity holds : @xmath30{\lambda } xt}\ ai(t @xmath31 is airy function @xcite consider third order pde @xmath32 solution writes @xmath33 applying identity eq .limiting @xmath8 find @xmath34{3}} \infty}\mathrm{d}k\left(\frac{k}{\sqrt[3]{3}}\right)\mathrm{e\sqrt[3]{y_x f(x \nonumber \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{3}} \infty}{d}k(\frac{k}{\sqrt[3]{3}}\right) f(x + \sqrt[3]{y \nonumber \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{3 y}}- \infty}\infty}\mathrm{d}\xi\left(\frac{x - \xi}{\sqrt[3]{3 y}}\right)(\xi) ( y > 0)\end{aligned} recognized airy transform function @xmath13 concept airy transform introduced @xcite applications classical quantum physicsairy transform monomial @xmath35{3 y}} \int_{- \infty}^{} \mathrm{d}\xi\ ai\left(- \frac{x - \xi}{\sqrt[3]{3 y}}\right) \xi^n\ \qquad ( y > 0) defined as airy polynomials @xcite third order hermite polynomials @xmath36 characteristic recurrences @xmath37 inferred from eq . two variable extension airy functions @xmath38 ordinary airy function writes @xmath39{3y}}\\left(\frac{x}{\sqrt[3]{3y}}\right) satisfies ode @xmath40 function linked @xmath41 @xmath42 satisfies ode @xmath43 @xmath44 written as @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 generalization airy function @xmath49 satisfying ode @xmath50 comparison ordinary airy function generalization order 7 shown in fig . point of view generalized case @xmath51 consider generalized hermite polynomials odd order ( @xmath52 ) same procedure leads to integral representation @xmath53{(2p + 1 ) |y|}}\ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}\ \mathrm{d}\xi\ ai^{(2p + 1 ) } \left(\frac{\xi - x}{\sqrt[2p + 1]{(2p + 1 ) |y|}}\right)\,\xi^n\; use further variable theory special functions polynomials offers freedom derive new properties hidden case hermite polynomials acquire new flavor @xmath6 variable airy function eq . natural solution pde @xmath54 translation property @xmath55 write solution equation @xmath56 @xmath57 further generalization @xmath58 satisfies higher order heat equation obtain solution same family equation integral transform consider schrdinger equation @xmath59 describing motion particle linear potential ( @xmath60 constant dimension force ) equation written convenient form @xmath61 dimensions squared length @xmath62 inverse cube length @xmath63 dimensions length @xmath64 discussed refs .@xcite previous equation treated different means simple solution auxiliary function : @xmath65 satisfies equation @xmath66 solution written as @xmath67 operator @xmath68 integral form recognized as airy transform solution equation @xmath69 obtained analogous given by @xmath70 operator @xmath71 expressed integral transforms linked to higher order airy functions examples generalization airy function due to watson @xcite introduced class of functions interesting properties for physical applications example consider function expressed @xmath72 compared to ordinary airy function in fig . satisfies ode unitary transformation @xmath74 associated to first ode @xmath75 transformation removed second order derivative simplified underlying group symmetry reduced from @xmath76 to dilatation group example new point of view to schrdinger type equations quadratic potentials discuss airy polynomials exploited series expansion of function problems orthogonal properties of ordinary higher order hermite polynomials considered in previous publications @xcite use point of view developed ref consider expansion @xmath77 operational tools provides coefficients @xmath78 display orthogonal properties of family polynomialsdefinition higher orders hermite polynomials yields @xmath79 identity action exponential operator function @xmath13 @xmath80{3 |y|}}\int- \infty\mathrm{d}\xi \frac{x - \xi}{3 |y(\xi ) \sum_{n = 0}^\infty\,a_n,x^n\ explicit expression airy function yields @xmath80{3 |y|}}\frac{1}{2 \pi}{- \infty}\infty}\mathrm{d}\xi \infty\mathrm{d}t{\left\frac{\imath}{3}\frac{\xi - x}{\sqrt[3]{3 |y(\xi \sum_{n = 0}^\infty\,a_n\,x^n\expansion @xmath81-dependent part exponential lhs previous equation yields @xmath82{3 |y|}}{ \infty}}\mathrm{d}t f(\xi)\partial_\xi^n(\frac{\xi}{\sqrt[3]{3 |y|}}\right) holds if integral rhs equation converges concluding remarks touched problems link watson @xmath83 functions general airy - type transforms relevance bell - type polynomials rigorous formulation orthogonality properties airy polynomials topic forthcoming investigation. dattoli e. sabia binomial transform journal integral transforms special functions o. valle m. soares airy functions application world scientific london 2004 )
| 0.558731
| 3,065
| 1,675
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,325
|
we study the dynamics of an ensemble of non - interacting harmonic oscillators in a nonlinear dissipative environment described by the nos - hoover model . using numerical simulation
we find the histogram for total energy , which agrees with the analysis of the nos - hoover equations effected with the method of averaging .
the histogram does not correspond to gibbs canonical distribution .
we have found oscillations at frequency proportional to @xmath0 , @xmath1 the dissipative parameter of thermostat and @xmath2 the characteristic mass of particle , about the stationary state corresponding to equilibrium .
the oscillations could have an important bearing upon the analysis of simulating molecular dynamics in the nos - hoover thermostat .
|
the nos - hoover model , @xcite,@xcite , is widely used in molecular dynamics for simulating a system s behavior at constant temperature . the central idea of the model , that is the introduction ancila dynamic variables to control kinetic energy , admits of various implementations . in the most simple and exploited form it amounts to considering a minimal non - linear extension of the original equations for the system .
it should be noted that hamiltonian versions of the model drew considerable attention , @xcite . in the present paper
we study the nos - hoover model in the form generally employed in molecular dynamics , that is a system constructed from initial hamiltonian equations , i.e. newton s second law , by employing non - linear dissipative terms on their right - hand sides and an additional equation for the dissipation constant,@xmath3 , which is allowed to vary in time , so that the equations of evolution read @xmath4 in this setting the nos - hoover model is a hamiltonian system with dissipation . for small values of @xmath1
the dissipative effects can be treated within the framework of perturbation theory .
considerable criticism has been levelled at the nos - hoover approach , ( see paper @xcite and references therein ) , because it runs across difficulties in providing the correct thermodynamic behavior for simple harmonic systems , but it is still generally accepted that its efficiency improves with the increase of complexity and dimension of the simulated system,@xcite .
in fact , from the point of view of dynamical theory it models a non - linear time - dependent dissipative environment and , therefore , has some proper physical interest . in this paper
we focus our attention on ensembles of harmonic oscillators ; the importance of such systems follows from the fact that among these , is the harmonic lattice , familiar in the theories of solids and molecules .
the potential energy of a harmonic lattice is given by the quadratic form @xmath5 in which @xmath6 is the @xmath7-th coordinate of the @xmath8-th particle .
to see the symmetry properties of the model we may cast eq.([n - h1 ] ) in the matrix form @xmath9 in which @xmath10 is the matrix of force constants , @xmath11 .
it can be transformed by an appropriate orthogonal transformation , @xmath12 , to the diagonal form @xmath13 assume that all @xmath14 are equal , @xmath15 , and let @xmath12 be the matrix of the orthogonal transformation mentioned above , and @xmath16 an @xmath17-dimensional vector of coordinates with respect to the new coordinate system determined by @xmath12 . since @xmath18 is constant , and @xmath3 is an invariant of orthogonal transformation , we may cast eq.([n - h1 ] ) in the form @xmath19 so that the equation acquires the form @xmath20 in which the matrix @xmath21 is the diagonal one .
thus , we have transformed the original problem of harmonic lattice to that for a set of harmonic oscillators , which do not interact with each other .
the latter problem is more tractable , from analytical point of view . at this point
it is worthwhile to notice that problems of molecular dynamics involves dynamical systems of extremely high dimension , and this circumstance brings about specific difficulties for numerical simulation .
the best approach to the problem is to use analytical methods in conjunction with the numerical ones , especially in cases like the nos - hoover model , where systematic investigation of high dimensional problems is particularly interesting , ( see @xcite ) . for this end
we use the method of windows worked out for the needs of the relaxation dynamics of spin in superfluid @xmath22 , ( see the review article @xcite ) to obtain a general picture of the nos - hoover dynamics for an ensemble of harmonic oscillators .
we show that it is characterized by the presence of oscillations round the stationary solution corresponding to an equilibrium , for which the phase - space sampling is different from the normal law .
the numerical analysis of the nos - hoover model given by eqs.([n - h1 ] ) , which is a high - dimensional non - linear dissipative system , is a serious challenge , and , in fact , it is generally confined to low dimensional situations,(see paper @xcite , in which the case of two oscillators is considered ) . in treating high - dimensional problems
the key point is the wise choice of output variables . in the present case
it is dictated by the physics of the problem , and taking into account the structure of the nos - hoover model , that is its being a hamiltonian system with dissipation , we employ , to the effect , the total energy of the system @xmath23 , @xmath24 and the dissipative variable @xmath3 . directing the output in plane @xmath25 , we obtain a kind of two - dimensional window on the phase - space of the model , which has dimension @xmath26
, @xmath17 is the number of oscillators .
since we aim at studying the situations in which @xmath17 is large , the two - dimensional reduction is of primary importance .
next , one should look for the distribution law for the the system in phase - space , and one could expect that it should be either the microcanonical or the gibbs one ; the first is characterized by its being centered on a particular value of energy , @xmath27 , whereas the latter by its being of the characteristic bell - shape .
nothing of the sort happens .
energy regions of the phase - space against visiting time ; the number of oscillators @xmath28 .
dashed line corresponds to eq.([arcsin ] ) provided by the averaged equations .
, width=288,height=192 ] to find the distribution law we consider the partition of the phase - space in regions @xmath30 corresponding to the energy intervals @xmath31 assumed to be of equal size , and compile a record of periods of time @xmath32 which the system spends in regions ( [ regions ] ) ; the total time of simulation reads @xmath33 the frequencies for the system s visiting the regions are given by the equation @xmath34 it is convenient to use a representation for the set of frequencies by means of histogram , that is rectangles whose widths represent the energy intervals ( [ regions ] ) and whose heights represent corresponding frequencies .
it is worth noting that the partition of the phase - space in the energy regions ( [ regions ] ) can be effected in a more graphic form with the help of the window @xmath25 on the phase space .
in fact , the numerical simulation gives the picture of the system s motion as a thin ring , the times @xmath35 are those spent in the bands @xmath36 .
therefore , the frequencies ( [ visiting ] ) could be found with the two - dimensional window , @xmath37 , see fig.([build ] ) .
trajectories visiting regions @xmath38 in ( @xmath23 - @xmath3 ) window .
@xmath39 , @xmath40 , @xmath29 . ,
width=288,height=192 ] recall that we shall consider a set of n _ one - dimensional _ harmonic oscillators . by following the prescription given above
we obtain the histogram given in fig.([hyst1p ] ) , describing the probability distribution @xmath41 for the system in the phase - space .
it is quite different from the microcanonical one or the gibbs one .
it is important that the window @xmath25 provides a means for elucidating the form of the fluctuations round the stationary state given by the equations @xmath42 the circular motion seen from the window @xmath43 is characterized by a mean angular velocity given by the law @xmath44 to within one - thousandth .
the fact agrees with the histogram given in fig.([hyst1p])(see section [ sec : averaging ] for the details ) . for the case of ideal gas
the oscillation law @xmath45 was found in @xcite ( see eqs.(5 ) and ( 8) of paper @xcite ) .
it should be noted that the shape of the histogram depends on the amplitude of the oscillations , that is the size of deviations in the energy @xmath23 from the stationary value @xmath46 determined by the temperature parameter of the model . in the next section
we shall find the distribution using averaging method , and it is worth noting that the numerical results are in good agreement with those given by the averaging , as is seen from fig.([maxwell1p ] ) . the distribution in energy that should correspond to gibbs canonical ensemble for the set of harmonic oscillators at temperature @xmath47 ,
is given by the equation @xmath48 and is totally different from fig.([hyst1p ] ) .
the discrepancy between the obtained and expected distributions indicate that the nos - hoover model describes a kind of non - linear dissipative system having special properties .
bars , energy distribution , obtained from numerical experiment .
curve , gibbs distribution for the set of harmonic oscillators .
@xmath28 , @xmath29 . ,
the simulation of the last section , which was thoroughly checked by calculating with different algorithms and comparing their results , might nonetheless be subject to artifacts and errors . in this respect
, it is important that analytical means capable of verifying section [ sec : histogram ] , have been used and resulted in agreement with the numerical work .
let us notice that according to the prescription described in introduction ( see eqs .
( [ n - h1 ] ) ) the ensemble of @xmath17 harmonic oscillators confined to the nos - hoover thermostat is described by the system of equations @xmath49 it is important that the dissipative constant @xmath1 is suggested to be small , @xmath50 , therefore , we may consider , as the first approximation the non dissipative regime for which @xmath51 , @xmath52 . in this case
there is an exact solution given by the equation @xmath53 the energy of the @xmath8-th oscillator devided by mass @xmath2 reads @xmath54 all the masses of the particles assumed equal , @xmath55 , oscillators differing by their frequencies @xmath56 .
equations ( [ xx ] ) , from the topological point of view , mean that the ensemble s motion belongs to an @xmath17-dimensional torus , the whole phase space being foliated by the tori .
we shall consider the system at temperature @xmath47 .
since the parameter @xmath1 is small , we may take into account the nonlinear dissipative terms on the right hand sides of eqs .
( [ nos1_1 ] ) , within the framework of the averaging approach , that is by substituting the basic equations ( [ xx ] ) into the right hand sides of the exact equations @xmath57 and cancelling out the oscillating terms .
thus , we obtain the averaged equations @xmath58 or @xmath59 as follows from eq.([energy1 ] ) . since
the total energy of the system is given by the equation @xmath60 we obtain the following two equations @xmath61 which have the stationary solution : @xmath62 describing the oscillators at the temperature parameter @xmath63 close to the stationary solutions we have the equations for energy @xmath64 in which @xmath65 is small .
therefore the equations for @xmath65 and @xmath3 acquire the form @xmath66 on linearizing the equations indicated above we obtain @xmath67 and hence the equation for @xmath65 @xmath68 which has the form of harmonic oscillator with the frequency @xmath69 solutions to eqs.([nos1_1 ] ) are illustrated in plane ( @xmath23,@xmath3 ) , in fig.([oscil1p ] ) oscillations round the stationary solution , the characteristic frequency @xmath70 .
@xmath28 , @xmath29 .
dashed line corresponds to the averaged motion of @xmath3 and @xmath23 .
, width=288,height=192 ] we may use eq.([z ] ) for finding the time spent by the system in the region of the phase - space corresponding to the energy interval , @xmath71 ; it is given by the equation @xmath72 \label{arcsin}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which leads to the agreement with histogram of fig.([hyst1p ] ) .
we have studied the dynamics of an ensemble of harmonic oscillators confined to the nos - hoover thermostat , the number of the oscillators , @xmath17 , being large , and the dissipative constant , @xmath1 , small .
the numerical simulation , and the analytical averaging method , indicate that the nos - hoover model does not provide for _ thermodynamically meaningful distribution _ of the system s samples in the phase - space , e.g. there is no gibbs distribution .
the @xmath44-frequency law deserves some attention . indeed , if the mass @xmath2 of a particle , corresponding to the oscillator , be @xmath73 , and @xmath74 , the frequency of the oscillations generated by the thermostat dynamics , should be in the region of @xmath75 ghz , that is low frequency region of molecular vibrations .
therefore in applying the nos - hoover thermostat to simulating molecular dynamics in ghz - region , one might expect spurious effects of parametric resonance . at the same time it is worth noting that the nos - hoover model corresponds with a hamiltonian system confined to dissipative environment , that is it comprises a base hamiltonian system , e.g the oscillators , and a dissipative extension formed by ancila variables , in the present case it is the variable @xmath3 . a similar systems , even though more sophisticated ,
is the leggett - takagi theory of spin dynamics in superfluid phases of helium-3 , @xcite , in which the equation describing the spin motion are augmented by an equation for the order parameter , which contains a dissipative term .
the situation is reminiscent of that taking place in the hydrodynamics treatment of viscous phenomena in the ghz - region , where according to the theory worked out by mandelstam and leontovic , see @xcite , the effects of dissipation can be accommodated by employing an ancila dynamical variable @xmath76 , which describes certain states of the system , e.g. concentration of a chemical reagent . the evolution equations for @xmath76 have dissipative character , for they should describe the system s coming to equilibrium , though the initial equations for the system could be of hamiltonian form .
the nos - hoover model may turn out to be of a similar kind and thus helpful in studying interesting physical problems .
99 s.nos , progr.theor.phys . suppl . * 103 * , 1 - 46 ( 1991 ) .
w.g . hoover and b.l .
holian , phys.lett . *
a211 * , 253 ( 1996 ) .
hoover , phys.rev . *
a31 * , 1695 ( 1985 ) .
m.dalessandro , a.tenenbaum , and a.amadei , j.physical chemistry b 106 , 5050 ( 2002 ) .
h.a.posch , w.g.hoover , and f.j.vesely , phys.rev . *
a33 * , 4253 ( 1985 ) .
golo , int.j.shape modeling , * 1 * , 109 ( 1994 ) . a.j.leggett and s.takagi , ann.phys . * 106 * , 79 ( 1977 ) .
v.l . golo and a.a.leman , spin relaxation in superfluid @xmath77 in turned - off and weak magnetic fields , in `` helium three '' , eds .
w.p.halperin and l.p.pitaevskii , elsevier ( 1990 ) . l.d.landau and e.m.lifshitz , hydrodynmics , ch.viii , nauka ( 1988 ) .
|
nos - hoover model used in molecular dynamics for simulating system behavior at constant temperature central idea introduction dynamic variables to control kinetic energy admits various implementations simple form minimal non - linear extension of original equations system hamiltonian versions drew attention present paper study nos hoover model employed system constructed from initial hamiltonian equations newton s second law employing non - linear dissipative terms additional equation for dissipation constant@xmath3 allowed to vary in time equations of evolution read @xmath4 model is hamiltonian system with dissipation for small values of @xmath1 dissipative effects treated within perturbation theory criticism at nos - hoover approach difficulties in providing correct thermodynamic behavior for simple harmonic systems efficiency improves with complexity dimension system models non - linear time - dependent dissipative environment has physical interest paper focus attention on ensembles harmonic oscillators importance from harmonic lattice familiar in theories solids potential energy of harmonic lattice given by quadratic form @xmath5 @xmath6 is @xmath7-th coordinate of @xmath8-th particlesee symmetry properties model cast eq.([n - h1 ] ) in matrix form @xmath9 @xmath10 matrix of force constants @xmath11 transformed by orthogonal transformation @xmath12 to diagonal form @xmath13 assume @xmath14 equal @xmath15 @xmath12 matrix of orthogonal transformation @xmath16 @xmath17-dimensional vector of coordinates new coordinate system determined @xmath12 @xmath18 constant @xmath3 invariant orthogonal transformation cast eq.([n - h1 ] ) in form @xmath19 equation acquires form @xmath20 matrix @xmath21 diagonal transformed original problem harmonic lattice harmonic oscillators not interact latter problem more tractable analytical molecular dynamics systems high dimension difficulties for numerical simulation best approach use analytical methods with numerical nos - hoover model high dimensional use method of windows worked out relaxation dynamics of spin in superfluid @xmath22 obtain general picture nos - hoover dynamics for harmonic oscillators characterized presence oscillations round stationary solution corresponding equilibrium phase - space sampling different from normal lawnumerical analysis of nos - hoover model eqs.([n - h1 ] ) high - dimensional non - linear dissipative system challenge confined to low dimensional situations paper @xcite case two oscillators high - dimensional problems key wise choice of output variables dictated by physics problem structure model hamiltonian system with dissipation employ total energy @xmath23 @xmath24 dissipative variable @xmath3 directing output in plane @xmath25 two - dimensional window on phase - space dimension @xmath26 , @xmath17 number of oscillators studying situations @xmath17 large two - dimensional reduction primary importance for distribution law for system in phase - space microcanonical or gibbs one first centered on value of energy @xmath27 latter characteristic bell - shape energy regions time number of oscillators @xmath28 . line corresponds to eq.([arcsin ] ) averaged equationswidth=288,height=192 find distribution law consider partition phase - space in regions @xmath30 energy intervals @xmath31 equal size compile record periods time @xmath32 system spends in regions total time simulation reads @xmath33 frequencies system visiting regions given by equation @xmath34 representation frequencies histogram rectangles widths represent energy intervals heights frequencies partition phase - space in energy regions graphic window @xmath25 phase space numerical simulation system s motion as thin ring times @xmath35 spent in bands @xmath36 frequencies visiting found with two - dimensional window @xmath37 fig.([build trajectories visiting regions @xmath38 @xmath23 - @xmath3 ) window @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath29 width=288,height=192 consider set n one - dimensional harmonic oscillators following prescription obtain histogram fig.([hyst1p ] ) describing probability distribution @xmath41 system in phase - space different from microcanonical or gibbs onewindow @xmath25 fluctuations round stationary state equations @xmath42 circular motion from window @xmath43 characterized by mean angular velocity law @xmath44 within one - thousandth agrees with histogram in fig.([hyst1p])(see section : averaging ] details ideal gas oscillation law @xmath45 found in @xcite see eqs.(5 ) and ( 8) paper @xcite shape histogram depends on amplitude oscillations deviations energy @xmath23 from stationary value @xmath46 temperature parameter next section distribution using averaging method numerical results with averaging fig.([maxwell1p ] ) distribution energy to gibbs canonical ensemble for harmonic oscillators at temperature @xmath47 by equation @xmath48 different from fig.([hyst1p ] ) discrepancy between expected distributions nos - hoover model non - linear dissipative system special properties energy distribution numerical experiment curve gibbs distribution for harmonic oscillators @xmath28 , @xmath29 simulation last section might be subject to artifacts errors analytical means verifying section [ : histogram ] used agreement with numerical workprescription introduction eqs n - h1 @xmath17 harmonic oscillators nos - hoover thermostat described by equations @xmath49 dissipative constant @xmath1 small @xmath50 consider non dissipative regime for @xmath51 , @xmath52 exact solution by equation @xmath53 energy of @xmath8-th oscillator devided by mass @xmath2 @xmath54 masses particles equal @xmath55 oscillators differing by frequencies @xmath56 equations ensemble s motion belongs to @xmath17-dimensional torus phase space foliated by tori consider system at temperature @xmath47 parameter @xmath1 small nonlinear dissipative terms right sides of eqs . averaging approach substituting basic equations xx into equations @xmath57 cancelling oscillating terms obtain averaged equations @xmath58 or @xmath59 from eq.([energy1 ] ) total energy system by equation @xmath60 two equations @xmath61 stationary solution @xmath62 oscillators at temperature parameter @xmath63 equations for energy @xmath64 @xmath65 smallequations @xmath65 @xmath3 acquire form @xmath66 linearizing obtain @xmath67 equation @xmath65 @xmath68 form harmonic oscillator frequency @xmath69 solutions eqs.([nos1_1 illustrated plane @xmath23,@xmath3 fig.([oscil1p oscillations round stationary solution characteristic frequency @xmath70 @xmath28 @xmath29 line averaged motion @xmath3 @xmath23=288,height=192 use eq.([z ] time spent system phase - space energy interval @xmath71 given equation @xmath72 agreement with histogram fig.([hyst1p ] studied dynamics harmonic oscillators nos - hoover thermostat number oscillators @xmath17 large dissipative constant @xmath1 small numerical simulation analytical averaging nos - hoover model thermodynamically meaningful distribution system samples phase - space no gibbs distribution @xmath44-frequency law deserves attention mass @xmath2 particle oscillator @xmath73 @xmath74 frequency oscillations thermostat dynamics region @xmath75 ghz low frequency region molecular vibrationsapplying nos - hoover thermostat molecular dynamics ghz - region effects parametric resonance model corresponds hamiltonian system confined dissipative environment base hamiltonian system dissipative extension ancila variables variable @xmath3 similar leggett - takagi theory spin dynamics superfluid phases helium-3 equation spin motion augmented by equation order parameter dissipative term reminiscent hydrodynamics treatment viscous phenomena ghz - region mandelstam leontovic effects dissipation accommodated ancila dynamical variable @xmath76 describes states concentration chemical evolution equations for @xmath76 dissipative character system s equilibrium initial equations could be hamiltonian form nos - hoover model similar helpful studying physical problems s.nos , progr.theor.phys . suppl . * 103 * , 1 - 46 ( 1991 ) hoover holian , phys.lett . a211 * , 253 ( 1996 ) hoover phys.rev . a31 *, 1695 ( 1985 ) m.dalessandro a.tenenbaum a.amadei chemistry 106 5050 2002 ) h.a.posch.hoover f.j.vesely.rev 4253 1985 ) golo.shape modeling 109 1994 ) a.j.leggett s.takagi ann.phys 106 79 1977 ) golo.a.leman spin relaxation superfluid turned - off weak magnetic fields helium three w.p.halperin l.p.pitaevskii elsevier 1990 ).landau.lifshitz hydrodynmics.viii nauka 1988 )
| 0.567831
| 3,424
| 1,810
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,348
|
the widths of the decays @xmath0 and @xmath1 are calculated in the framework of the njl model .
it is shown that these decays are defined by the @xmath2 and @xmath3 quark mass difference .
it leads to the suppression of these decays in comparison with the main decay modes . in the process
@xmath0 the intermediate scalar @xmath4 state is taken into account . for the @xmath5
decays the intermediate states with @xmath4 , @xmath6 and @xmath7 mesons are used .
our estimates are compared with the results obtained in other works .
+ * keywords * : tau decays , chiral symmetry , nambu - jona - lasinio model , radial excited mesons + * pacs numbers * : 13.35.dx decays of taus 12.39.fe chiral lagrangians
|
at present , the decays @xmath0 and @xmath1 are not well studied in experiments @xcite . however ,
recently , a number of works devoted to the investigation of these processes in the framework of the different phenomenological models were published @xcite . on the other hand , in @xcite it was shown that different modes of the @xmath5 decay can be satisfactorily described in the njl model @xcite . in the present paper ,
the njl model is used for the description of the decays @xmath0 and @xmath1 .
the probabilities of the transitions @xmath8 and @xmath9 are calculated .
these transitions are defined by the mass difference between @xmath2 and @xmath3 quarks and can be calculated in the framework of the njl model without attraction of any arbitrary parameters .
our results will be compared with the estimates obtained in @xcite .
it is shown that the amplitudes with intermediate vector mesons dominate in the @xmath10 decay .
for calculation of this decay we should first calculate two non - diagonal transitions @xmath11 and @xmath12 within the njl model .
these transitions go through quark loops containing @xmath2 and @xmath3 quarks ( see fig . [ fig1 ] ) .
cc etapi ( 150,30 ) & vtoa0 ( 150,30 ) the amplitude of the transition @xmath8 has the form @xmath13 where @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 are masses of @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 mesons , respectively , given in pdg @xcite ; @xmath20 and @xmath21 are constituent quark masses , @xmath22 mev . using the last experimental data for the decay
@xmath23 @xcite we obtain @xmath24 mev .
this decay was described in detail in @xcite .
the @xmath18 @xmath19 mixing @xmath25 for the @xmath18 meson and @xmath26 for the @xmath19 meson . the mixing angle @xmath27 was defined in @xcite . the constant @xmath28 and integrals @xmath29
, @xmath30 are defined in @xcite @xmath31\ , , \\
i_2(m ) & = & -i\frac{n_c}{(2\pi)^4}\int^{\lambda_4 } \frac{{\mbox{d}}^4k}{(m^2 - k^2)^2 } = \frac{n_c}{(4\pi)^2}\left[\log\left(\frac{\lambda_4 ^ 2}{m^2 } + 1\right ) - \left(1 + \frac{m^2}{\lambda_4 ^ 2}\right)^{-1}\right]\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath32 is a number of quark colors and @xmath33 mev is a 4-dimentional cut - off parameter in the standard njl model @xcite .
the obtained estimates coincide with those used in @xcite .
one can see the comparison in table [ tbl1 ] .
.comparison of @xmath34 [ cols= " < , < , < , < " , ] [ tbl1 ] the transition @xmath35 takes the form @xmath36 where @xmath37 is momentum of the @xmath38 meson .
the @xmath38 meson decay width is defined by two diagrams in figs .
[ fig2 ] and [ fig3 ] .
rho1 ( 250,100 ) rho2 ( 250,100 ) the first diagram describes the amplitude which contains the @xmath11 transitions in the final state @xmath39 where @xmath40 is defined in @xcite .
the second diagram describes the amplitude containing the intermediate @xmath41 meson @xmath42 where the vertex @xmath43 was defined in @xcite @xmath44 and @xmath45 mev is the mass of the @xmath46 meson @xcite .
thus , for branching fractions we get @xmath47 where @xmath48 .
we note that in these calculations we take into account only the ground state of @xmath49 because the decay with the intermediate @xmath50 is suppresed by a large mass of the radial - excited meson .
our estimates coincide with one taken in @xcite .
these estimates do not contradict known experimental limits @xcite .
the description of the decay @xmath51 was obtained in @xcite with satisfactory agreement with current experimental data .
tau1 ( 250,100 ) we use the amplitude from @xcite with the @xmath8 transitions ( [ pietatrans ] ) in the final states ( see fig .
[ fig4 ] ) dependence for a rough estimate . ]
@xmath52 where the breit - wigner relation @xmath53 and @xmath54 parameter were defined in @xcite . for the processes with the intermediate vector meson we get contributions to branching fractions @xmath55 the @xmath56 transition takes the form @xmath57 where @xmath58 is the electroweak constant .
tau2 ( 250,100 ) the amplitude with the intermediate scalar meson ( see fig .
[ fig5 ] ) takes the form @xmath59 where @xmath60 is the breit wigner formula for the @xmath61 meson with @xmath62 mev , @xmath63 mev , @xmath64 mev taken from pdg @xcite and @xmath65 mev calculated from ( [ a0njl ] ) which coincides with the upper pdg limit @xcite . for the estimation of the contribution of the radial - excited @xmath66 to
the @xmath5 decays we should use the extended njl model @xcite .
the amplitudes @xmath67 of the @xmath68 decays can be found in @xcite .
the transition @xmath69 takes the form @xmath70 where @xmath71 and @xmath72 are the mixing angles , and @xmath73 .
thus , we get the @xmath74 parameter @xmath75 where phase factor @xmath76 are taken similarly @xcite . the values
@xmath77 and @xmath78 do not contradict with ones given in @xcite .
the contributions to the branching fractions from the amplitude ( [ scalamp ] ) are @xmath79 the expression for the total width is @xmath80 note that there is no interference between the vector and scalar intermediate state contributions .
thus , for branchings we get @xmath81 let us note that our estimations for scalar contributions are much less than ones in previous works .
our calculations are in qualitative agreement with the previous theoretical estimates obtained in @xcite .
however , the njl model allows us to describe the transitions @xmath8 and @xmath82 using the same methods . as the result
, we can compare the contribution of amplitudes with intermediate scalar and vector mesons from uniform positions .
these calculations show that in the decays @xmath0 and @xmath10 the scalar meson plays a insignificant role .
however , in the decay @xmath83 the processes with intermediate @xmath49 and @xmath84 make contributions comparable with the contributions of intermediate vector mesons .
it is worth noticing that the width of the decay @xmath85 calculated in the njl model is close to the values obtained in @xcite @xmath86 this confirms the relevance of our expression for the vertex @xmath87 used in ( [ scalamp ] ) . for the vertex
@xmath88 the expression was used ( [ a0njl ] ) .
we get the amplitude ( [ scalamp ] ) by the matching these expressions through propagator of scalar @xmath49 meson .
this contradicts the vdm - like ansatz for the intermediate resonance used in @xcite @xmath89 on the other hand , if we use this ansatz for a vector to scalar transition taken in @xcite and calculate @xmath0 with this ansatz then we get by an order of magnitude @xmath90 this estimate for the branching fraction is close to the current experimental limit @xcite and can be tested in the near future at the high - luminosity @xmath91 colliders in novosibirsk and beijing , for example .
therefore , the problem of relevancy of vector scalar transition representation can be clarified .
we are grateful to b. a. arbuzov , a. b. arbuzov and e. a. kuraev for useful discussions .
this work was supported by the rfbr grant 10 - 02 - 01295-a .
k. nakamura _ et al .
_ [ particle data group collaboration ] , j. phys .
g g * 37 * , 075021 ( 2010 ) .
t. ferbel , phys .
* 21 * , 111 ( 1966 ) .
del amo sanchez _ et al .
_ [ the babar collaboration ] , phys . rev .
d * 83 * , 032002 ( 2011 ) [ arxiv:1011.3917 [ hep - ex ] ] .
s. tisserant and t. n. truong , phys .
b * 115 * , 264 ( 1982 ) .
h. neufeld and h. rupertsberger , z. phys .
c * 68 * , 91 ( 1995 ) .
s. nussinov and a. soffer , phys . rev .
d * 78 * , 033006 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0806.3922 [ hep - ph ] ] .
s. nussinov and a. soffer , phys .
d * 80 * , 033010 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0907.3628 [ hep - ph ] ] .
n. paver and riazuddin , phys .
d * 82 * , 057301 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1005.4001 [ hep - ph ] ] .
n. paver and riazuddin , phys . rev .
017302 ( 2011 ) [ arxiv:1105.3595 [ hep - ph ] ] . y. .p .
ivanov , a. a. osipov and m. k. volkov , z. phys .
c * 49 * , 563 ( 1991 ) .
m. k. volkov , y. p. ivanov and a. a. osipov , sov . j. nucl .
* 52 * , 82 ( 1990 ) [ yad .
52 * , 129 ( 1990 ) ] .
m. k. volkov and d. g. kostunin , arxiv:1202.0506 [ hep - ph ] .
m. k. volkov , a. b. arbuzov and d. g. kostunin , arxiv:1204.4537 [ hep - ph ] .
d. ebert and m. k. volkov , z. phys .
c * 16 * , 205 ( 1983 ) .
m. k. volkov , annals phys . *
157 * , 282 ( 1984 ) .
m. k. volkov , sov .
j. part .
* 17 * , 186 ( 1986 ) [ fiz .
chast . atom .
yadra * 17 * , 433 ( 1986 ) ] .
d. ebert and h. reinhardt , nucl .
b * 271 * , 188 ( 1986 ) .
m. k. volkov , phys . part .
* 24 * , 35 ( 1993 ) .
d. ebert , h. reinhardt and m. k. volkov , prog .
phys . * 33 * , 1 ( 1994 ) .
m. k. volkov and a. e. radzhabov , phys .
* 49 * , 551 ( 2006 )
. m. k. volkov , m. nagy and v. l. yudichev , nuovo cim .
a * 112 * , 225 ( 1999 ) [ hep - ph/9804347 ] .
m. k. volkov and c. weiss , phys . rev .
d * 56 * , 221 ( 1997 ) [ hep - ph/9608347 ] .
m. k. volkov , phys .
nucl . * 60 * , 1920 ( 1997 ) [ yad .
60n11 * , 1094 ( 1997 ) ] [ hep - ph/9612456 ] .
|
decays @xmath0 @xmath1 not studied in experiments @xcite recently works published @xcite modes of @xmath5 decay described in njl model @xcite present paper njl model used for decays @xmath0 and @xmath1 probabilities of transitions @xmath8 and @xmath9 calculated transitions defined by mass difference between @xmath2 and @xmath3 quarks without arbitrary parameters results compared with estimates in @xcite amplitudes with intermediate vector mesons dominate in @xmath10 decay for calculation calculate non - diagonal transitions @xmath11 and @xmath12 within njl model transitions go through quark loops @xmath2 and @xmath3 quarks fig amplitude of transition @xmath8 has form @xmath13 are masses of @xmath17 @xmath19 mesons @xmath20 and @xmath21 are constituent quark masses @xmath22 mev using last data for decay @xmath23 @xmath24 mev decay described in @xcite@xmath18 @xmath19 mixing @xmath25 @xmath26 mixing angle @xmath27 defined @xcite constant @xmath28 integrals @xmath29 @xmath30 defined @xcite @xmath31_2(m )\frac{n_c}{(2\pi)^4}{\lambda_4 } ^4k{(m^2 - k^2)^2 } ={n_c}{(4\pi)^2}\left(\frac{\lambda_4 2}{m^2 } + 1\right ) -^2_4 2{-1} @xmath32 quark colors @xmath33 4-dimentional cut - off parameter standard njl model @xcite estimates coincide @xcite comparison table tbl1 @xmath34 transition @xmath35 form @xmath36 @xmath37 momentum @xmath38 meson @xmath38 meson decay width defined two diagrams figs fig2 fig3 ] first diagram amplitude @xmath11 transitions final state @xmath39 @xmath40 defined @xcitesecond diagram describes amplitude intermediate @xmath41 vertex @xmath43 defined @xcite @xmath44 mev mass @xmath46 meson branching fractions @xmath47 @xmath48 calculations ground state @xmath49 decay intermediate @xmath50 suppresed mass radial - excited meson estimates coincide with @xcite contradict experimental limits @xcite description decay @xmath51 obtained @xcite agreement data 250,100 amplitude from @xcite @xmath8 transitions final states rough estimate @xmath52 breit - wigner relation @xmath53 @xmath54 parameter defined @xcite processes intermediate vector meson contributions branching fractions @xmath55 @xmath56 transition form @xmath57 @xmath58 electroweak constant tau2 ( 250,100 ) amplitude intermediate scalar meson form @xmath59 @xmath60 breit wigner formula @xmath61 meson @xmath62 mev pdg @xcite @xmath65 mev coincides upper pdg limit @xcite estimation contribution radial - excited @xmath66 @xmath5 decays use extended njl model @xciteamplitudes @xmath67 @xmath68 decays in @xcite transition @xmath69 form @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 mixing angles @xmath73 @xmath74 parameter @xmath75 phase factor @xmath76 similarly @xcite values @xmath77 @xmath78 contradict @xcite contributions branching fractions amplitude scalamp @xmath79 total width @xmath80 no interference between vector scalar intermediate state contributions branchings @xmath81 estimations for scalar contributions less than previous works agreement with previous estimates @xcite njl model transitions @xmath8 @xmath82 same methods compare contribution amplitudes intermediate scalar vector mesons uniform positions calculations decays @xmath0 @xmath10 scalar meson insignificant role decay @xmath83 processes intermediate @xmath49 @xmath84 contributions comparable vector mesons width decay @xmath85 njl model close to values @xcite @xmath86 confirms relevance expression vertex @xmath87 scalamp vertex @xmath88 expression used a0njl ] ) amplitude scalamp matching expressions through propagator scalar @xmath49 mesoncontradicts vdm - ansatz intermediate resonance @xcite @xmath89 use ansatz vector scalar transition @xcite calculate @xmath0 get order magnitude @xmath90 estimate branching fraction close experimental limit @xcite tested high - luminosity @xmath91 colliders novosibirsk beijing problem relevancy vector scalar transition representation clarified grateful arbuzov kuraev discussions work supported rfbr grant 10 - 02 - 01295-a nakamura particle data group collaboration phys . 37 * 075021 ( 2010 ) ferbel phys . 21 * 111 ( 1966 ) del amo sanchez babar collaboration phys . rev d 83 * 032002 ( 2011 ) arxiv:1011.3917 tisserant truong phys . 115 * 264 ( 1982 ) neufeld rupertsberger . 68 * 91 ( 1995 ) nussinov soffer phys d 78 * 033006 ( 2008 ) arxiv:0806.3922 soffer d 80 * 033010 ( 2009 ) arxiv:0907.3628 paver riazuddin phys . d 82 * 057301 ( 2010 ) arxiv:1005.4001 hep - ph paver riazuddin phys . rev 017302 2011 ) arxiv:1105.3595 ivanov a a osipov m k volkov phys . 49 563 ( 1991 ) k volkov ivanov osipov 52 82 ( 1990 ) 129 ( 1990 volkov d g kostunin arxiv:1202.0506 hep - ph m k. volkov b arbuzov d g kostunin arxiv:1204.4537 hep - ph d ebert m k volkov . 16 205 ( 1983 ) volkov annals phys . 157 282 ( 1984 ) volkov 17 186 ( 1986 ) 17 433 ( 1986 d. ebert h. nucl 271 188 ( 1986 ) volkov . 24 35 ( 1993 ) ebert h reinhardt volkov phys . 33 1 ( 1994 ) volkov a e radzhabov phys . 49 551 ( 2006 ) k volkov m. nagy v l. yudichev 112 225 ( 1999 ) hep - ph/9804347volkov weiss . rev 56 221 1997 ) hep - ph/9608347 volkov phys . nucl 60 1920 1997 ) 60n11 1094 1997 hep - ph/9612456
| 0.43538
| 2,959
| 1,515
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,350
|
the cubic trigonometric b - spline(ctb ) functions are used to set up the collocation method for finding solutions of the burgers equation .
the effect of the ctb in the collocation method is sought by studying two text problems .
the burgers equation is fully - discretized using the crank - nicholson method for the time discretizion and ctb function for discretizion of spatial variable .
numerical examples are performed to show the convenience of the method for solutions of burgers equation * keywords : * collocation methods , cubic trigonometric b - spline , burgers equation
|
since the introduction of the burger s equation by bateman@xcite , many authors have used variety of numerical methods in attempting to solve the burger s equation .
various forms of the finite element methods are constructed to compute the burger s equation numericallyad , ad1,nu2,sku , ad5,ofem3,bspgal , qq , zi . the spline collocation procedures are also presented for getting solutions of the burger s equationrt , er , ras , cbspcol , irk , ram , qbspcol2,qbspcol , dag , quincol .
the spline functions are wished to be accompanied to the numerical method to solve the differential equations since the resulting matrix system is always diagonal and can be solved easily and approximate solutions having the accuracy of the degree less than the degree of the spline functions can be set up .
high order continuous differentiable approximate solutions can be produced for the differential equations of higher order .
the numerical procedure for nonlinear evolution equations based on the the b - spline collocation method have been increasingly applied to various fields of science .
however application of the ctb collocation method to non linear evolution problems are a few in comparison with the method the collocation based on the b - spline functions .
the numerical methods for solving a type of ordinary differential equations with quadratic and cubic ctb are given by a. nikolis in the papersg1,g2 .
the linear two - point boundary value problems of order two are solved using cubic ctb interpolation method @xcite .
the another numerical method employed the cubic ctb are set up to solve a class of linear two - point singular boundary value problems in the study@xcite . very recently a collocation finite difference scheme based on new cubic ctb is developed for the numerical solution of a one - dimensional hyperbolic equation ( wave equation ) with non - local conservation condition@xcite .
a new two - time level implicit technique based on the cubic ctb is proposed for the approximate solution of the nonclassical diffusion problem with nonlocal boundary condition in the study@xcite .
some researches have established types of the b - spline finite element approaches for solving the burger s equation but not with ctb as far as we know the literature . in this paper , ctb are used to establish a collocation method and then the suggested numerical method is applied to find the numerical solutions of burger s equation .
it is also well - known that this problem arise in many branch of the science and the development of the numerical methods for the burger s equation have been attracted for finding the steep front solutions .
the use of the lower viscosity in the burger s equation cause the appearance of the steep front and shock wave solutions . that makes difficulty in modelling solutions of the burger s equation when solved numerically .
so many authors have developed various kinds of numerical scheme in computing the equation effectively for small values of the viscosity .
we consider the burger s equation @xmath0 with appropriate initial conditions and the boundary conditions:@xmath1 @xmath2 , @xmath3 where subscripts @xmath4 and @xmath5 denote differentiation , @xmath6 and @xmath7 is the reynolds number characterizing the strength of viscosity .
@xmath8 @xmath9 are the constants and @xmath10 is a sufficiently differentiable unknown function and @xmath11 is a bounded function . the implementation of the proposed scheme is given in the second section .
two classical text problems are dealt with to show the robustness of the scheme .
consider a uniform partition of the problem domain @xmath12 $ ] at the knots @xmath13 with mesh spacing @xmath14 on this partition together with additional knots @xmath15 outside the problem domain , @xmath16@xmath17 can be defined as @xmath18 $ \\ $ \omega ( x_{i-2})(\omega ( x_{i-2})\phi ( x_{i})+\phi ( x_{i+1})\omega ( x_{i-1}))+\phi ( x_{i+2})\omega ^{2}(x_{i-1}),$ & $ x\in \left [ x_{i-1},x_{i}% \right ] $ \\ $ \omega ( x_{i-2})\phi ^{2}(x_{i+1})+\phi ( x_{i+2})(\omega ( x_{i-1})\phi ( x_{i+1})+\phi ( x_{i+2})\omega ( x_{i})),$ & $ x\in \left [ x_{i},x_{i+1}\right ] $ \\ $ \phi ^{3}(x_{i+2}),$ & $ x\in \left [ x_{i+1},x_{i+2}\right ] $ \\ \multicolumn{1}{c } { } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$0,\text{otherwise}$}% \end{tabular}% \right .
\label{r2}\ ] ] where @xmath19 @xmath20 are twice continuously differentiable piecewise trigonometric cubic b - spline on the interval@xmath21 $ ] .
the iterative formula @xmath22 gives the cubic b - spline trigonometric functions starting with the ctb - splines of order @xmath23 @xmath24 each @xmath20 is twice continuously differentiable and the values of @xmath25 and @xmath26 at the knots @xmath27 s can be computed from eq.([r3 ] ) as @xmath28 } $ \\ \hline $ x_{i}$ & $ \frac{2}{1 + 2\cos ( h)}$ & 0 & $ \frac{-3\cot ^{2}(\frac{3h}{2})}{% 2 + 4\cos ( h)}$ \\ \hline $ x_{i+1}$ & $ \sin ^{2}(\frac{h}{2})\csc \left ( h\right ) \csc ( \frac{3h}{2})$ & -$\frac{3}{4}\csc ( \frac{3h}{2})$ & $ \frac{3(1 + 3\cos ( h))\csc ^{2}(\frac{h% } { 2})}{16\left [ 2\cos ( \frac{h}{2})+\cos ( \frac{3h}{2})\right ] } $ \\ \hline
$ x_{i+2}$ & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}% \end{tabular}%\ ] ] @xmath20 , @xmath29 are a basis for the trigonometric spline space
. an approximate solution @xmath30 to the unknown @xmath31 is written in terms of the expansion of the ctb as @xmath32 where @xmath33 are time dependent parameters to be determined from the collocation points @xmath13 and the boundary and initial conditions .
the nodal values @xmath31 and its first and second derivatives at the knots can be found from the ( [ r4 ] ) as @xmath34@xmath35 the time derivative and space derivatives can be approximated by using the standard finite difference formula and the crank
nicolson scheme respectively to have the time - integrated burger s equation : @xmath36where @xmath37 is the solution of the equation at the @xmath38th time level .
here @xmath39 @xmath40 , and @xmath41 is the time step , superscripts denote @xmath42 th time level , @xmath43 the nonlinear term @xmath44 in eq .
( [ r6 ] ) is linearized by using the following form @xcite:@xmath45so linearized time - integrated burger equation have the following form:@xmath46substitution [ r4 ] into [ r8 ] and evaluation resulting equation at knots leads to the fully - discretized equation : @xmath47 where@xmath48 the system consist of @xmath49 linear equation in @xmath50 unknown parameters @xmath51 .
the above system can be made solvable by elimination the time parameters @xmath52with help of the boundary conditions @xmath53 when written as @xmath54a variant of thomas algorithm is used to solve the system .
initial parameters @xmath55 must be found to start the iteration process .
to do so , initial condition and boundary values of derivative of initial conditions gives the following equation 1 .
@xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 2 .
@xmath59 3 .
@xmath60 the above system yields an ( @xmath50)@xmath61(@xmath50 ) matrix system , which can be solved by use of the thomas algorithm .
once the initial parameters @xmath62 has been obtained from the initial and boundary conditions , the recurrence relation gives time evolution of vector @xmath63from the time evolution of the approximate solution @xmath64 can be computed via the equation ( [ r6 ] ) .
* ( a ) * analytical solution of the burger s equation with the problem sine wave initial condition @xmath65 and boundary conditions @xmath66 can be expressed as an infinite series @xcite where @xmath68 are the modified bessel functions .
this problem gives the decay of sinusoidal disturbance .
the convergence of the solution r11 is slow for small values of @xmath69so that the numerical solutions of the burger s equation are looked for . using the parameters @xmath70
@xmath71 graphical solutions at different times are depicted in the figs 1 - 4 the amplitude of the solution decays as time pass , seen in fig 1 - 2 clearly and the sharpness through the right boundary develops when the smaller viscosities are used .
he same incidents also exist for studies given in the paper @xcite the results of proposed numerical methods are compared with the cubic b - spline collocation , cubic b - spline galerkin .
galerkin procedure are seen to produce slightly same results with the ctb collocation method .
our advantage is that the cost of the ctb procedure is less than the galerkin methods given in the tables 1 - 3 .
@xmath74@xmath75@xmath76 * ( b ) * well - known other solution of the burger s equation is@xmath77where @xmath78 @xmath79 and @xmath80 are arbitrary constants .
initial conditions are@xmath81 @xmath82 or @xmath83 @xmath84 for @xmath85 this form of the solution is known as the travelling wave equation and respresent the propogation of the wave front through the right .
parameter @xmath69 determine the sharpness of the solution the initila solutions are taken from the analytical solution when @xmath86 .
the program is run for the parameters @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 and @xmath90 .
solutions at some space values @xmath4 are presented in table 5 and compared with those obtained in the studies @xcite using cubic b - spline collocation , quadratic / cubic b - spline galerkin methods .
solution behaviours are illustrated in fig 5 - 6 for the coefficient @xmath91 and @xmath92 at times @xmath93 with smaller @xmath94the sharp front is formed and propogates to right during run of the program .
graphical presentation of the absolute errors at time @xmath95 is drawn i m figs 7 - 8@xmath96 @xmath98.}% \end{array}% \begin{tabular}{l } \frame{itbpf}{2.7224in}{2.3065in}{0in}{}{}{fig6.bmp}{\special{language " scientific word";type " graphic";maintain - aspect - ratio true;display " usedef";valid_file " f";width 2.7224in;height 2.3065in;depth 0in;original - width 2.6801in;original - height 2.2667in;cropleft " 0";croptop " 1";cropright " 1";cropbottom " 0";filename ' fig6.bmp';file-properties " xnpeu " ; } } \\
figure 6 : solutions at different times for \\
$ \lambda = 0.005,$ $ h=1/36,$ $ \delta t=0.001,\text { } x\in \lbrack 0,1].$% \end{tabular}%\ ] ] the collocation methods with trigonometric b - spline functions is made up to find solutions the burger s equation .
we have hown that methods is capable of producing solutions of the burgers equation fairly .
the method can be used as an alternative to the methods accompanied b - spline functions .
nur nadiah abd hamid , ahmad abd .
majid , and ahmad izani md .
ismail , cubic trigonometric b - spline applied to linear two - point boundary value problems of order , world academy of science , engineering and technology 70 798 - 803 , 2010 .
i. da , a. canivar and a. ahin , taylor galerkin and taylor - collocation methods for the numerical solutions of burgers equation using b - splines , commun nonlinear sci numer simulat vol.16 , pp . 26962708,2011 .
m. abbas , a. a. majid , a. i. m ismail and a. rashid , the application of the cubic trigonometric b - spline to the numerical solution of the hyperbolic problems , applied mathematica and computation , vol 239 , 74 - 88 , 2014 .
|
introduction burger s equation by bateman authors used numerical methods finite element methods compute burger s equation ad1,nu2 ad5,bspgal qq zi spline collocation procedures presented for solutions equationrt er ras cbspcol irk ram qbspcol2 dag quincol spline functions accompanied numerical method differential equations matrix system diagonal solved approximate solutions accuracy less spline functions high order continuous differentiable approximate solutions for differential equations higher numerical procedure nonlinear evolution equations b - spline collocation method applied to fields science application ctb collocation method non linear evolution problems few with b - spline numerical methods for solving ordinary differential equations with quadratic cubic ctb by a. nikolis linear two - point boundary value problems solved using cubic ctb interpolation method method cubic ctb linear two - point singular boundary value problems collocation finite difference scheme based on cubic ctb developed for solution one - hyperbolic equation with non - local conservation conditionnew two - time level technique cubic ctb proposed for solution nonclassical diffusion problem with nonlocal boundary condition study@xcite researches established b - spline finite element approaches for solving burger s equation not with ctb paper ctb used establish collocation method suggested numerical method applied find solutions burger s equation problem in many science numerical methods for burger s equation attracted for steep front solutions lower viscosity in burger s equation steep front shock wave solutions difficulty modelling solutions numerically authors developed numerical scheme computing equation for small values viscosity consider burger s equation @xmath0 with initial conditions boundary conditions:@xmath1 @xmath3 denote differentiation reynolds number strength viscosity @xmath8 constants differentiable unknown function bounded function implementation proposed scheme in second section two classical text problems dealt with show robustness schemeuniform partition problem domain @xmath12 knots @xmath13 mesh spacing @xmath14 partition additional knots @xmath15 outside problem domain @xmath16@xmath17 defined @xmath18\omega x_{i-2\phi{i+1}){i-1} x{i+2}){2}(x_{i-1 x_{i-1},x_{i}\omega x_{i-2})\phi{2}(x_{i+1})+\phi x_{i+2\omega x_{i-1})\phi x_{i+1})+\phi x_{i+2})\omega x_{i} x_{i},x_{i+1}\phi ^{3}(x_{i+2}), x_{i+1},x_{i+2}\multicolumn{1}{c }{1}{c}}\end{tabular}% @xmath19 @xmath20 differentiable piecewise trigonometric cubic b - spline interval@xmath21iterative formula @xmath22 gives cubic b - spline trigonometric functions ctb - splines @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath20 continuously differentiable values @xmath25 @xmath26 knots @xmath27 computed from eq.([r3 @xmath28 x_{i} \frac{2}{1 + 2\cos ( h)}({3h}{2} 2 + 4\cos ( h) x_{i+1}{2}\frac{h{2}){3h\frac{3}{4}{2}\frac{3(1 + 3\cos ( h)){2} 2\cos {h}{2})+\cos{3h}{2})\right x_{i+2}${tabular} @xmath20 @xmath29 basis for trigonometric spline space approximate solution @xmath30 to unknown @xmath31 expansion ctb @xmath32 @xmath33 time dependent parameters determined from collocation points @xmath13 boundary initial conditionsnodal values @xmath31 first second derivatives at knots found from @xmath34@xmath35 time space derivatives approximated standard finite difference formula crank nicolson scheme time - integrated burger s equation : @xmath37 solution @xmath38th time level @xmath39 time step superscripts @xmath42 th time level @xmath43 nonlinear term @xmath44 linearized linearized time - integrated burger equation form@xmath46substitution [ r4 ] into [ r8 ] evaluation equation at knots leads fully - discretized equation : @xmath47 system @xmath49 linear equation @xmath50 unknown parameters @xmath51 solvable time parameters boundary conditions @xmath53 thomas algorithm solve initial parameters @xmath55 found start iteration process initial condition boundary values equation @xmath56 @xmath59 @xmath60 system yields @xmath50)@xmath61(@xmath50 ) matrix system solved thomas algorithminitial parameters @xmath62 obtained from boundary conditions recurrence relation time evolution vector @xmath63from approximate solution @xmath64 computed via equation ( [ r6 ] analytical solution burger s equation sine wave initial condition @xmath65 boundary conditions @xmath66 infinite series @xmath68 modified bessel functions decay sinusoidal disturbance convergence solution r11 slow for small values numerical solutions parameters @xmath70 @xmath71 graphical solutions times depicted in figs 1 - 4 amplitude solution decays as time pass sharpness right boundary develops smaller viscosities used same incidents studies paper results numerical methods compared with cubic b - spline collocation galerkin same results ctb collocation method cost ctb procedure less than galerkin - @xmath74@xmath75@xmath76 solution burger s equation@xmath77where @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 arbitrary constants initial conditions@xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 solution travelling wave equation propogation wave front right parameter @xmath69 sharpness solution solutions from analytical solution @xmath86program run parameters @xmath87 solutions space values @xmath4 presented table 5 compared studies @xcite cubic b - spline collocation b - spline galerkin methods solution behaviours illustrated fig 5 - 6 coefficient @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath93 smaller sharp front formed propogates right run program presentation absolute errors @xmath95 drawn figs 7 - 8@xmath96 @xmath98.{array{tabular{2.7224in{2.3065in.bmp scientific aspect - ratio true;display_file f";width 2.7224in;height 2.3065in 0in width 2.6801in height 2.2667in;cropleft 0";croptop 0";filename fig6.bmp-properties xnpeu figure 6 solutions different times\lambda = 0.005 h=1/36\delta t=0.001{tabular collocation methods trigonometric b - spline functions find solutions burger s equation solutions burgers equation method alternative to methods b - spline functions nadiah abd hamid ahmad abdmajid ahmad ismail trigonometric b - spline point boundary problems world academy science engineering technology 798 - 803 2010 canivar ahin taylor galerkin taylor collocation numerical solutions burgers equation b - splines nonlinear sci numer simulat vol.16 26962708 abbas majid ismail rashid trigonometric b - spline hyperbolic problems applied mathematica computation vol 239 74 - 88 2014
| 0.499847
| 2,990
| 1,532
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,353
|
it is widely believed that ultraluminous infrared ( ir ) galaxies and active galactic nuclei ( agn ) activity are triggered by galaxy interactions and merging , with the peak of activity occurring at @xmath0 , where submillimetre galaxies are thousands of times more numerous than local ulirgs . in this evolutionary picture
, submillimetre galaxies ( smgs ) would host an agn , which would eventually grow a black hole ( bh ) strong enough to blow off all of the gas and dust leaving an optically luminous qso . to probe this evolutionary sequence we have focussed on the missing link sources , which demonstrate both strong starburst ( sb ) and agn signatures , in order to determine if the sb is the main power source even in smgs when we have evidence that an agn is present from their irac colours . the best way to determine
if a dominant agn is present is to look for their signatures in the mid - infrared with the _ spitzer _ irs , since often even deep x - ray observations miss identifying the presence of agn in heavily dust - obscured smgs .
we present the results of our audit of the energy balance between star - formation and agn within this special sub - population of smgs where the bh has grown appreciably to begin heating the dust emission .
address = icc , durham university , uk address=_spitzer fellow _
, national optical astronomy observatory , tuscon , az , usa address = nsf astronomy and astrophysics postdoctoral fellow , the observatories of the carnegie institution for science , pasadena , ca , usa address = department of physics , durham university , uk address = scottish universities physics alliance , institute for astronomy , university of edinburgh , royal observatory , uk
|
_ spitzer _ spectroscopy has revealed that @xmath1% of smgs are sb - dominated in the mid - infrared ( @xcite ; @xcite ) .
we have focussed on the remaining @xmath2% that show signs of harboring powerful agn and use _ spitzer_-irs spectroscopy to study a sample of 8 smgs @xmath3jy at 24@xmath4 m from the scuba half degree extragalactic survey ( shades ; @xcite ) selected on the basis of an irac color - selection ( @xmath5 ; i.e. likely power - law mid - infrared seds ; see fig . 1 ) .
the full analysis will be presented in coppin et al.(apj , submitted ) , and our main results are as follows : * there are signs of sf from pah features in _ all _ of our smgs , from which we derive redshifts between 2.53.4 , demonstrating the power of the mid - ir to determine redshifts when the optical counterparts are too faint to study with current facilities . *
the irs spectra show signs of _ both _ sb and agn activity in our @xmath5 smg sample , with a continuous distribution of agn fractions in the mid - ir .
overall , smgs selected in this way tend to have more dominant agn - components in the mid - ir than typical smgs , with a median agn - fraction of 58% .
although , extrapolation to the far - ir reveals that the agn is bolometrically unimportant in the majority of smgs , indicating that the level of agn contamination in the overall smg population is probably @xmath6% . for comparison , typical smgs
have @xmath7% agn contribution in the mid - infrared , while they are from a very similar sb @xmath8 class to our sample of @xmath9 .
* when literature sources are taken into account , a colour - selection of @xmath10 is a better description overall for defining the boundary between sb and agn - dominated smgs , with a small amount of scatter across this division ( see fig . 1 ) .
* our results are thus consistent with the evolutionary scenario @xcite , with all smgs undergoing a ` transitional ' agn - dominated phase with a duty cycle of @xmath2% .
our sample of agn - dominated smgs could be at a slightly later stage of evolution than sf - dominated smg systems , with the sf still occurring but where the agn has now begun to heat the dust appreciably in the smg as the bh undergoes a period of rapid growth .
we would like to thank the conference organizers , stfc , nsf , nasa and the royal society for financial support , and also our collaborators from shades who contributed to this work .
this work is based in part on observations made with the _
spitzer space telescope _ , which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology under a contract with nasa .
|
spitzer spectroscopy revealed @xmath1% smgs sb - dominated mid - infrared focussed on remaining @xmath2% powerful agn spitzer_-irs spectroscopy 8 smgs @xmath3jy at 24@xmath4 m from scuba half degree extragalactic survey selected irac color - selection likely power - law mid - infrared fig 1 full analysis presented in coppin et al. main results signs of sf from pah features in smgs redshifts between 2.53.4 power mid - ir determine redshifts irs spectra show sb and agn activity in @xmath5 smg sample continuous distribution agn fractions mid - ir smgs selected more dominant agn - components mid - ir median agn - fraction 58% extrapolation to far - ir reveals agn bolometrically unimportant in majority smgs agn contamination smg population probably @xmath6% typical smgs have @xmath7% agn contribution mid - infrared similar sb class to sample colour - selection of @xmath10 better description for defining boundary between sb agn - dominated smgs small scatter across division fig .results consistent with evolutionary scenario @xcite smgs undergoing transitional agn - dominated phase duty cycle @xmath2% sample agn - dominated smgs later stage evolution than sf - dominated systems sf still occurring agn heat dust in smg bh rapid growth thank conference organizers stfc nsf nasa royal society for financial support collaborators from shades based on observations spitzer space telescope operated by jet propulsion laboratory california institute of technology contract with nasa
| 0.130922
| 645
| 332
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,355
|
the stochastic protein kinetic equations can be stiff for certain parameters , which makes their numerical simulation rely on very small time step sizes , resulting in large computational cost and accumulated round - off errors .
for such situation , we provide a method of reducing stiffness of the stochastic protein kinetic equation by means of a kind of variable transformation . theoretical and numerical analysis show effectiveness of this method .
its generalization to a more general class of stochastic differential equation models is also discussed . + * ams subject classification : * 65c20 , 65c30 . + * key words : * numerical methods for sdes ; stochastic protein kinetic equation ; stiffness ; midpoint rule .
|
consider the following stochastic differential equation describing the kinetics of the proportion @xmath0 of one of two possible forms of certain proteins @xmath1 where @xmath2 is interaction coefficient of the two proteins , @xmath3 is the amplitude of the random gaussian perturbation , and @xmath4 is the standard brownian motion .
the small circle @xmath5 before @xmath6 denotes the stochastic integral of stratonovich sense ( @xcite ) .
there is no explicit solution to this equation , wherefore numerical computations simulating the propagation of @xmath0 is needed .
one of the most well - known numerical methods for solving stochastic differential equations ( sdes ) is the euler - maruyama method , which is , however , only consistent to sdes of it type . for sdes of stratonovich type ,
the consistent method is the midpoint rule , which , when applied to ( [ 1.1 ] ) , takes the form : @xmath7 where @xmath8 is the uniform time step size , and @xmath9 obeying the gaussian distribution @xmath10 and independent for different @xmath11 .
the mean - square convergence of this method can be proved ( @xcite ) .
the deterministic midpoint rule is an a - stable method suitable for dealing with stiff equations .
for example , for the deterministic version of the equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) , i.e. , the equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) with @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 is an asymptotically stable solution as @xmath15 .
with @xmath16 we get the linearized equation of ( [ 1.3 ] ) @xmath17 which can be very stiff as @xmath18 is large , e.g. , @xmath19 . then in this case , the original non - linear equation ( [ 1.3 ] ) is also stiff , meaning that its numerical simulation may need the choice of very small step size @xmath20 . to illustrate this
, we use the euler method @xmath21 and the midpoint rule @xmath22 to solve ( [ 1.3 ] ) numerically , and observe the effect in fig .
[ f1 ] . in fig .
[ f1.1 ] , @xmath23 , we see that both the euler method ( blue dotted ) and the midpoint rule ( red dash - dotted ) produce significant oscillating simulation error , while in fig .
[ f1.2 ] , where @xmath24 , the midpoint rule creates a reasonable numerical solution remaining close to the true solution .
note that there is no explicit true solution for ( [ 1.3 ] ) , we just use the midpoint rule with a tiny step size @xmath25 to approximate the true solution ( blue solid ) .
however , if the step size is small enough , e.g. @xmath26 as used in fig .
[ f1.3 ] , both of the two methods give very accurate simulations which coincide visually with the true solution .
in fact , as @xmath18 gets larger and larger , the needed @xmath20 for effective computation becomes smaller and smaller .
this illustrates that the simulation of the equation ( [ 1.3 ] ) is sensitive to the time step size @xmath20 , due to stiffness of the equation .
meanwhile , it can be seen that the midpoint rule is more stable than the euler method .
for the stochastic protein kinetic equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) , @xmath14 is also a stochastically asymptotically stable solution if @xmath15 .
this can be seen from its linearized stochastic differential equation with @xmath27 ( @xcite ) @xmath28 the solution of which is @xmath29 .
thus the lyapunov exponent @xmath30 of ( [ 1.7 ] ) is ( @xcite ) @xmath31 due to @xmath32 with probability 1 . at the same time ,
similar to its deterministic counterpart ( [ 1.4 ] ) , the equation ( [ 1.7 ] ) can also be very sensitive to its simulation time step size @xmath20 as @xmath18 is large , e.g. @xmath19 .
in other words , we say ( [ 1.7 ] ) is stiff for large @xmath18 . in this case , the original non - linear equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) is also stiff ( @xcite ) .
this can be seen by numerical experiments , which we show in section 3 , where we see that although the stochastic midpoint rule ( [ 1.2 ] ) is applied , cautious choice of small time step size @xmath20 is still needed , which increases computational cost and accumulates round - off errors , especially for large time intervals .
therefore it is meaningful to investigate effective measures to reduce the stiffness of the stochastic differential equations , such as the equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) , for efficient numerical simulation of such equations .
for the purpose mentioned above , we employ the technique of variable transformation .
[ lem2.1 ] for @xmath15 , the linearized stochastic differential equation ( [ 1.7 ] ) is equivalent to the following linear sde @xmath33 via the variable transformation @xmath34 * proof .
* since the ordinary differential chain rule holds for sdes of stratonovich type , a direct calculation yields @xmath35\\ & = -zdt-\frac{\sigma}{1+\lambda}z\circ dw(t ) .
\end{split}\ ] ] note that , for large @xmath18 , the equation ( [ 1.7 ] ) is much more stiff than its equivalent equation ( [ 2.1 ] ) , since the lyapunov exponent for ( [ 2.1 ] ) is @xmath36 , obtained in the same way as in ( [ 1.8 ] ) .
we thus find a way of reducing the stiffness of ( [ 1.7 ] ) via the variable transformation ( [ 2.2 ] ) . here , @xmath15 is to guarantee that @xmath37 is the stochastically asymptotically stable solution of ( [ 1.7 ] ) , and that the transformation ( [ 2.2 ] ) is meaningful at @xmath37 . applying the same transformation to the original non - linear stochastic protein kinetic equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) ,
we obtain the following result .
[ prop2.2 ] for @xmath15 , the stochastic protein kinetic equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) is equivalent to the following sde @xmath38 via the variable transformation @xmath39 the linearized equation of ( [ 2.4 ] ) at its stochastically asymptotically stable solution @xmath40 is the equation ( [ 2.1 ] ) .
* proof . *
the inverse transformation of ( [ 2.5 ] ) is @xmath41 using the differential chain rule together with ( [ 2.5])-([2.6 ] ) we obtain @xmath42\\ & = \frac{-1}{1+\lambda}[(x+\lambda xx)dt+\sigma xx\circ dw(t)]\\ & = ( -x+\frac{\lambda}{1+\lambda}x^{2+\lambda})dt-(\frac{\sigma}{1+\lambda}x-\frac{\sigma}{1+\lambda}x^{2+\lambda})\circ dw(t ) .
\end{split}\ ] ] the condition @xmath15 can ensures that the transformation ( [ 2.5 ] ) and its inverse ( [ 2.6 ] ) are meaningful at @xmath14 and @xmath40 , respectively
. meanwhile , it makes @xmath40 a stochastically asymptotically stable solution of ( [ 2.4 ] ) .
the linearized equation of ( [ 2.4 ] ) at @xmath40 is @xmath43 which is just the equation ( [ 2.1 ] ) .
+ from proposition [ prop2.2 ] , it is clear that the equation ( [ 2.4 ] ) is much less stiff than the original equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) , since the linearized equation ( [ 2.1 ] ) of ( [ 2.4 ] ) is much less stiff than the linearized equation ( [ 1.7 ] ) of ( [ 1.1 ] ) for @xmath18 large ( @xcite ) .
thus , for the simulation of the stochastic protein kinetic equation , we can firstly apply the stochastic midpoint rule to the transformed equation ( [ 2.4 ] ) to get @xmath44 , and then use the inverse transform ( [ 2.6 ] ) to get back to @xmath45 . in the following section ,
we perform numerical tests to illustrate the difference the transformation ( [ 2.5 ] ) makes , that is , different degree of stiffness of ( [ 1.1 ] ) and ( [ 2.4 ] ) , reflected in the dependence on time step size @xmath20 in the numerical simulations of them using the stochastic midpoint rule .
in this section we compare the effect of numerical simulation of the stochastic protein kinetic equation based on the original equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) and its transformed equation ( [ 2.4 ] ) , respectively .
we apply the stochastic midpoint rule to both equations , with varying time step sizes for @xmath19 and @xmath46 .
the results are shown in fig .
[ f2 ] , for which we take @xmath47 , @xmath48 , and the number of iterations in each time step for the realization of the implicit stochastic midpoint rule is 10 . + in fig .
[ f2.1 ] and [ f2.2 ] , @xmath19 .
as @xmath49 , the midpoint rule applied to the equation before transform , i.e. , the original equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) loses accuracy severely , as shown by the blue dotted line in fig .
[ f2.1 ] , while that applied to the equation after transform , i.e. , the equation ( [ 2.4 ] ) together with the inverse transformation ( [ 2.6 ] ) produces much better simulation as illustrated by the red dash - dotted line in the same figure .
however , as @xmath20 is small enough , e.g. @xmath26 , the midpoint rule applied to both equations gives good numerical results , which can be seen in fig .
[ f2.2 ] .
as the stiffness increases by enlarging the absolute value of @xmath2 , for example , @xmath46 , we see in fig .
[ f2.3 ] that the time step size @xmath26 loses its effectiveness if the numerical simulation is performed on the original equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) without transformation , while remains valid if the numerical simulation is performed on the transformed equation ( [ 2.4 ] )
. however , for a much smaller time step size @xmath25 , both simulations work fairly well again , with the cost of much more computations , as shown by fig .
[ f2.4 ] .
note that , there is no explicit true solution for ( [ 1.1 ] ) or ( [ 2.4 ] ) .
the solution lines ( blue solid ) are simulated by the midpoint rule approximation based on the original equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) with @xmath25 in fig .
[ f2.1]- [ f2.3 ] , and @xmath50 in fig .
[ f2.4 ] . to conclude , the numerical results show superiority of reducing stiffness of the sde ( [ 1.1 ] ) by variable transformation in the numerical computation of the equation .
it permits larger time step sizes , and therefore reduces computational costs and increases computational robustness .
the more general stochastic protein kinetic equations involve a varying parameter @xmath51 in the drift part @xmath52 in which case @xmath14 is not a stochastic stationary solution if @xmath53 .
however , if we still employ the variable transformation ( [ 2.5 ] ) , obtaining the transformed equation @xmath54 instead of ( [ 2.4 ] ) , we can still observe the effect of stiffness - reduction in the numerical tests for @xmath55 $ ] , as shown by fig .
[ f3 ] . as @xmath18 is small , or @xmath56 ,
the transformation is not recommended .
in fact , this method of reducing stiffness can be generalized to a more general class of sdes , e.g. , of the form @xmath57 where the functions @xmath58 and @xmath59 are regular enough for the following discussion .
this class of equations may cover many stochastic differential equation models in biology , chemistry , physics and so on .
assume that there exists a constant @xmath60 such that @xmath61 , and @xmath62 is a stochastically stationary solution of ( [ 4.1 ] ) .
thus , with @xmath63 , the linearized equation of ( [ 4.1 ] ) is ( @xcite ) @xmath64 if @xmath65 is large , then the equation ( [ 4.2 ] ) is stiff , and so is the original equation ( [ 4.1 ] ) .
we search for a variable transformation @xmath66 such that @xmath67 which is an ordinary differential equation with solution @xmath68 for the purpose of having inverse transformation , we take @xmath69 for @xmath70 , and @xmath71 for @xmath72 . in both cases
we have the following transformed equation of ( [ 4.2 ] ) @xmath73 which is less stiff than ( [ 4.2 ] ) for large @xmath65 .
based on these , we perform the transformation @xmath74 for @xmath75 and @xmath76 for @xmath77 on the equation ( [ 4.1 ] ) , to get its transformed equation @xmath78 for @xmath75 and @xmath79 for @xmath77 .
note that , if @xmath80 switches sign in the time interval of observation , then the transformation has no global inverse , which is a limitation of this method . to show that ( [ 4.12 ] ) or ( [ 4.13 ] ) is less stiff than the original equation ( [ 4.1 ] ) , we need to have the linearized equation of them at @xmath81 , which is just the equation ( [ 4.9 ] ) for both ( [ 4.12 ] ) and ( [ 4.13 ] ) , for @xmath82 . the less stiffness of ( [ 4.9 ] ) than ( [ 4.2 ] ) implies the less stiffness of ( [ 4.12 ] ) and ( [ 4.13 ] ) than ( [ 4.1 ] ) .
note that the condition @xmath82 is also to guarantee that the drift parts of both ( [ 4.12 ] ) and ( [ 4.13 ] ) tends to @xmath83 as @xmath84 , and that @xmath62 is a stochastically asymptotically stable solution of ( [ 4.1 ] ) .
the author is supported by the nnsfc ( no.11071251 , no.91130003 , no .
11471310 ) and the 2013 headmaster funds of ucas . klden p.e . , platen e. , numerical solution of stochastic differential equations , springer - verlag berlin heidelberg ( 1992 ) .
mao x. , stochastic differential equations and their applications , horwood , chichester ( 1997 ) .
milstein g.n . , numerical integration of stochastic differential equations , kluwer academic publishers ( 1995 ) .
|
stochastic differential equation kinetics proportion @xmath0 of two forms proteins @xmath1 @xmath2 interaction coefficient proteins @xmath3 amplitude random gaussian perturbation @xmath4 standard brownian motion small circle @xmath5 before @xmath6 denotes stochastic integral stratonovich sense no explicit solution numerical computations propagation @xmath0 needed stochastic differential euler - maruyama method consistent to sdes type for sdes stratonovich type consistent method midpoint rule applied to ( [ 1.1 ] ) form @xmath7 @xmath8 uniform time step size @xmath9 gaussian distribution @xmath10 independent for @xmath11 mean - convergence proved deterministic midpoint rule a - stable method stiff equations deterministic version equation 1.1 with @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 asymptotically stable solution @xmath16 linearized equation of ( [ 1.3 ] ) @xmath17 stiff as @xmath18 large original non - linear equation ( 1.3 ] ) stiff numerical simulation need small step size @xmath20use euler method @xmath21 midpoint rule @xmath22 solve ( [ 1.3 ] ) observe effect fig . f1 ] fig f1.1 @xmath23 euler method midpoint rule produce significant oscillating simulation error f1.2 @xmath24 midpoint rule creates reasonable numerical solution close to true solution no explicit true solution for ( [ 1.3 ] ) use midpoint rule tiny step size @xmath25 approximate true solution step size small @xmath26 f1.3 methods give accurate simulations true solution @xmath18 larger needed @xmath20 computation smaller simulation equation 1.3 ] ) sensitive to time step size midpoint rule more stable than euler method stochastic protein kinetic equation [ 1.1 ] ) @xmath14 stochastically stable solution @xmath15 linearized stochastic differential equation with @xmath27 @xmath28 solution @xmath29 lyapunov exponent @xmath30 of ( [ 1.7 ] ) @xcite ) @xmath31 due to @xmath32 probability 1 .similar to deterministic counterpart 1.4 ] ) equation 1.7 ] ) sensitive to simulation time step size large 1.7 ] ) stiff for large @xmath18 original non - linear equation ( [ 1.1 ] ) stiff seen by numerical experiments section 3 stochastic midpoint rule 1.2 applied cautious small time step size needed increases computational cost accumulates errors large time intervals investigate reduce stiffness of stochastic differential equations 1.1 for efficient numerical simulation employ technique variable transformation linearized stochastic differential equation ( [ 1.7 ] ) equivalent to linear sde @xmath33 via variable transformation @xmath34 ordinary differential chain rule holds for sdes stratonovich type direct calculation yields @xmath35\\ = -zdt-\frac{\sigma}{1+\lambda}z\circ dw(t ) for large @xmath18 equation [ 1.7 ] ) more stiff than equivalent ( [ 2.1 ] ) lyapunov exponent is @xmath36 stiffness of [ 1.7 ] ) via variable transformation ( [ 2.2 ] )@xmath15 @xmath37 stable solution [ 1.7 ] ) transformation 2.2 ] ) meaningful @xmath37 transformation original non - linear stochastic protein kinetic equation [ 1.1 ] ) result @xmath15 stochastic protein kinetic equation 1.1 ] ) equivalent @xmath38 variable transformation @xmath39 linearized equation [ 2.4 ] ) asymptotically stable solution @xmath40 equation [ 2.1 ] ) inverse transformation [ 2.5 ] ) @xmath41 differential chain rule [ 2.5])-([2.6 ] ) @xmath42\\+\lambda @xmath15 ensures transformation [ 2.5 ] ) inverse [ 2.6 ] ) meaningful @xmath14 @xmath40 makes @xmath40 stochastically asymptotically stable solution ( [ 2.4 ] ) linearized equation [ 2.4 ] ) @xmath40 @xmath43 equation ( [ 2.1 ] )proposition prop2.2 ] equation [ 2.4 ] ) less stiff than original [ 1.1 ] ) linearized equation 2.1 ] ) 2.4 ] 1.7 ] ) 1.1 ] @xmath18 @xcite ) simulation stochastic protein kinetic equation apply stochastic midpoint rule to transformed equation [ 2.4 ] ) @xmath44 inverse transform 2.6 ] ) @xmath45 numerical tests difference transformation ( [ 2.5 ] ) stiffness ( [ 1.1 ] ) [ 2.4 ] ) dependence time step size simulations compare effect numerical simulation original equation 1.1 ] ) transformed equation 2.4 ] ) apply stochastic midpoint rule to both equations varying time step sizes for @xmath19 @xmath46 results shown in fig . [ f2 ] @xmath47 @xmath48 number iterations each time step implicit stochastic midpoint rule 10 fig . f2.1 ] f2.2 ] @xmath19 @xmath49 midpoint rule applied before transform original equation 1.1 ] ) loses accuracy blue dotted line fig . f2.1 ] after transformequation ( [ 2.4 ] ) inverse transformation ( [ 2.6 ] ) better simulation illustrated red line @xmath20 small midpoint rule gives good results in fig f2.2 ] stiffness increases value @xmath2 time step size @xmath26 loses effectiveness if original equation without transformation remains valid if transformed equation 2.4 ] smaller time step size @xmath25 both simulations work well more computations fig . f2.4 ] no explicit true solution for ( [ 1.1 ] ) or [ 2.4 ] ) solution lines simulated by midpoint rule approximation original equation 1.1 ] ) @xmath25 f2.1 f2.3 @xmath50 f2.4 numerical results show superiority reducing stiffness sde ( [ 1.1 ] ) by variable transformation permits larger time step sizes reduces computational costs increases robustness general stochastic protein kinetic equations involve varying parameter @xmath51 drift part @xmath52 @xmath14 not stochastic stationary solution if @xmath53employ variable transformation 2.5 ] transformed equation @xmath54 instead 2.4 ] observe effect stiffness - reduction numerical tests @xmath55 shown fig . f3 @xmath18 small @xmath56 transformation not recommended method reducing stiffness class sdes form @xmath57 functions @xmath58 @xmath59 regular equations cover stochastic differential equation models biology chemistry constant @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 stochastically stationary solution of ( [ 4.1 ] ) @xmath63 linearized equation 4.1 ] ) @xmath64 @xmath65 large equation [ 4.2 ] ) stiff original equation 4.1 search variable transformation @xmath66 @xmath67 ordinary differential equation solution @xmath68 inverse transformation @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 transformed equation [ 4.2 ] ) @xmath73 less stiff than 4.2 large @xmath65 perform transformation @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 on equation [ 4.1 ] ) transformed equation @xmath78 for @xmath75 @xmath79 @xmath77@xmath80 switches transformation no global inverse limitation method 4.12 or 4.13 ) less stiff than original equation 4.1 ] ) need linearized equation at @xmath81 equation 4.9 ] for 4.12 4.13 @xmath82 less stiffness 4.9 ] ) than 4.2 ] ) implies less stiffness [ 4.12 4.13 4.1 ] ) condition @xmath82 drift parts of 4.12 4.13 to @xmath83 as @xmath84 @xmath62 stochastically stable solution of ( [ 4.1 ] ) author supported by nnsfc (.11071251.91130003 11471310 2013 headmaster funds ucas klden p platen e. numerical solution of stochastic differential equations springer - verlag 1992 mao x stochastic differential equations applications 1997 milstein numerical integration of stochastic differential equations kluwer publishers 1995 )
| 0.508297
| 3,406
| 1,803
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,358
|
very recently , it has been shown by other authors that the cdf measurement of the top quark forward - backward asymmetry can be explained by means of a heavy and broad axigluon . in order to work
, this mechanism needs that the axigluon coupling to the top quark must be different than the coupling to light quarks and both must be stronger than the one predicted in classical axigluon models . in this paper , we argue that this kind of axigluon can be accommodated in an extended chiral color model we proposed previously .
additionally , we show that the desired features can be derived from a simple four - site model with delocalized fermions .
|
although the high energy physics community is unanimous in considering the standard model ( sm ) to be incomplete for many and well known reasons , such as the higgs mass instability under quantum corrections or the unexplained hierarchy observed in the masses of the fermionic sector ; it is impossible to deny its enormous ( and , to some extent , unexpected ) experimental success . indeed , after years of scrutiny and new physics search , first at the lep and the tevatron and now at the lhc , the sm has not been still seriously challenged by collider experiments . the only exception today
may be the @xmath0 deviation recently reported by cdf in the top - quark forward - backward asymmetry ( @xmath1)@xcite ( see also @xcite and @xcite ) .
the fact that the process under question involves the top quark makes it even more interesting since , due to its mass which is near the electroweak scale , it has been suspected for a long time that the top - quark plays a special rle in nature . a natural candidate to explain a deviation in @xmath1 is an axigluon
( other alternatives beyond the sm have been considered in @xcite,@xcite,@xcite , @xcite , @xcite,@xcite,@xcite and @xcite ) .
in fact , this is an expected axigluon signal @xcite .
it is true that it has been argued that the present signal can not be explained by an axigluon due to other experimental constraints over it @xcite .
nevertheless , bai , hewett , kaplan and rizzo have argued that a heavy and broad axigluon can be a viable explanation of the @xmath1 while remaining invisible in the dijet spectrum @xcite . in their paper , they parameterize the axigluon interaction as @xmath2 where @xmath3 is the usual qcd coupling constant a @xmath4 measures the deviation of the axigluon coupling constant from qcd . in order to evade experimental constraint
it proves useful to consider that @xmath4 may take different values for light quarks ( @xmath5 ) and for the top quark ( @xmath6 ) .
the analysis presented in @xcite shows that in order to have a broad axigluon it must occur that @xmath7 . additionally , in order to escape detection in contact interaction searches it must happen that @xmath8 ( this kind of non - universality has been also reported in @xcite ) .
finally , @xmath9 must be negative in order to reproduce correctly the sign of @xmath1 .
the construction of a model that can incorporate all these conditions , specially the different coupling constants for different generations , has proven to be difficult . as a solution
, the authors of @xcite propose a two - site model but they have to include exotic vector - like quarks in order to satisfy the @xmath8 constrain . in this paper
, we address the construction of a viable axigluon model not by adding new fermions but by extending the gauge sector of the model . in section [ sec : effmodel ] we show that an effective model , based on @xmath10 but with four octet fields transforming as gauge bosons , has enough structure to accommodate all the desire features of the axigluon . in section [ sec:4site ] , we show that the essential characteristics of the effective model can be obtained from a four - site model with delocalized fermions .
finally , in section [ sec : summary ] , we summarize our conclusions .
we start by recalling an effective extended chiral model we have previously proposed@xcite . in this model , we consider an usual @xmath11 with two pairs of vectors fields : @xmath12 and @xmath13 transforming as gauge fields of @xmath14 , and @xmath15 and @xmath16 transforming as gauge fields of @xmath17 .
the gauge sector of the model ( including a non - linear sigma model sector which is introduced to produce the breaking of @xmath11 to @xmath18 ) is described by the following lagrangian : @xmath19 where @xmath20\\ g_{r\mu\nu } & = & \partial_{\mu}r_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}r_{\mu}-ig_{r}\left[r_{\mu},\ : r_{\nu}\right]\\ \rho_{l\mu\nu } & = & \partial_{\mu}l_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}l_{\mu}-ig'_{l}\left[l_{\mu},\ : l_{\nu}\right]\\ \rho_{r\mu\nu } & = & \partial_{\mu}r_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}r_{\mu}-ig'_{r}\left[r_{\mu},\ : r_{\nu}\right]\\ d_{\mu}u & = & \partial_{\mu}u - ig_{l}l_{\mu}u+ig_{r}ur_{\mu}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the unitary gauge a non - diagonal mass matrix is explicitly generated .
although the resulting mass matrix can be exactly diagonalized , in order to obtain easily manipulable expressions we will assume that @xmath21 and we will write our results in the first order in @xmath22 . the eigenvalues , that is , the masses of the physical states are : @xmath23 thus , the physical spectrum is composed of a ( exactly ) massless gluon , an axigluon and two degenerate ( at this level of approximation ) heavy gluon and axigluon .
the normalized mass eigenvectors can be written as : @xmath24 because we have now two fields that transform as gauge fields for each group ( @xmath12 and @xmath13 for @xmath25 and @xmath15 and @xmath16 for @xmath26 ) any combination of the form @xmath27 and @xmath28 , where @xmath29 is a new arbitrary parameter . in principle
, it can take different values in the right and left sectors but , for simplicity we will assume it is the same in both cases . with this structure it is possible to construct generalized covariant derivatives .
this means that the lagrangian describing the gauge interaction of quarks can be written as : @xmath30 using lagrangian ( [ eq : mylagferm ] ) and the definition of the physical fields , we can obtain the terms of the lagrangian that couple the gluon and the axigluon to quarks @xmath31 where : @xmath32 and @xmath33 interestingly , the mechanism described just above is related with fermion delocalization in deconstruction theory @xcite .
now we have an axigluon with a modified coupling to quarks .
nothing in the model prevents that the value of @xmath4 varies from one generation to another .
this implies that in this framework we can easily satisfy the necessary conditions ( in particular , @xmath8 constrain ) for making the axigluon compatible with existing data and , at the same time , explain the @xmath1 data from cdf .
the key features of the model described in this section are the presence of two pairs of vector bosons which transform like gauge fields and delocalized fermions .
these properties can be naturally implemented in a four - site model .
the construction of such a model is the subject of next section .
our simple four site model is based on the gauge group @xmath34 and three link fields ( @xmath35 , @xmath36 and @xmath37 ) as shown in figure [ fig : group ] .
we assume that the scalar fields develop vacuum expectation values ( @xmath38 and @xmath39 ) breaking down the gauge symmetry to @xmath18 which we identify with the usual color group .
the lagrangian for the bosonic sector can be written as : @xmath40 where @xmath41\\ d^{\mu}\sigma_1 & = & \partial_{\mu}\sigma_1 -iga_{1\mu}\sigma_1 + ig\sigma_1 a_{2\mu } \\
d^{\mu}u & = & \partial_{\mu}u -iga_{2\mu}u + igua_{3\mu } \\
d^{\mu}\sigma_2 & = & \partial_{\mu}\sigma_2 -iga_{3\mu}\sigma_2 + ig\sigma_2 a_{4\mu}\end{aligned}\ ] ] notice that in order to simplify our equations we have assume that all groups share the same coupling constant @xmath42 . as usual , in the unitary gauge ( @xmath43 ) a non - diagonal mass matrix for the gauges bosons explicitly appears .
this mass matrix can be exactly diagonalized , nevertheless , in benefice of simplicity , we work in the limit where @xmath44 . in this limit , the physical spectrum is composed of a ( exactly ) massless gluon @xmath45 , a light ( in the sense that its mass is proportional to @xmath46 ) axigluon @xmath47 and two degenerate heavy states ( @xmath48 and @xmath49 ) with masses proportional to @xmath50 .
the original gauge fields can be written in terms of the physical fields as follows : @xmath51 now we turn our attention to quarks .
a crucial feature of our effective model described in the previous section was the fact that the fermions coupled to a certain linear combination of gauge bosons . in the language of deconstruction theory , it correspond to `` fermion delocalization '' .
the main idea of fermion delocalization @xcite is that the low energy properties of the fermions ( for example the color interaction of quarks ) originate from the contribution of many sites of the underlying gauge group . in other words , the current couples to a linear combination of gauge fields @xmath52 with the constrain @xmath53 in order to preserve gauge invariance under the whole group .
as shown in figure [ fig : group ] , we decide to couple left handed quarks to @xmath54 and @xmath55 ( with weights @xmath56 and @xmath57 respectively ) and right handed quarks to @xmath58 and @xmath59 ( with weights @xmath57 and @xmath56 respectively ) . in this way , the interaction lagrangian for quarks can be written as : @xmath60+\nonumber\\ & & + gj_{r\mu}^a\left[xa^{a\mu}_4+(1-x)a^{a\mu}_2\right]\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath61 and @xmath62 are the quark left - handed and right - handed currents , respectively .
notice that we have chosen , for simplicity , the same delocalization parameter @xmath56 for right handed and left handed quarks . in terms of the physical fields the interaction lagrangian can be written as : @xmath63 where @xmath64 is the usual strong interaction coupling constant .
our delocalization pattern has provoked the appearance of a axigluon interaction which depends on the delocalization parameter @xmath56 .
as in our effective model , nothing prevents that different quark generations can be differently delocalized . in this way , we can select appropriated values of @xmath56 for the top quark and for the light quarks in order to consistently explain the @xmath1 measurements .
in summary , we have shown that an extended chiral color model with extra color octet spin-1 fields has enough structure to describe an axigluon with appropriate coupling to quarks in such a way that it can be consistent with dijet and contact interactions searches and , at the same time , explain the @xmath1 anomaly reported by cdf .
the fact that this effective model can be re - obtained from a four - site model , as we have shown , is interesting from the theoretical point of view since , in principle , it may be related , via dimensional deconstruction , to five dimensional models .
this work has been partially supported by fondecyt grant 1070880 , the conicyt grant `` southern theoretical physics laboratory '' act-91 , the conicyt grant `` instituto para estudios avanzados en ciencia y tecnologa '' act-119 and fondecyt grant 1110167 .
tgd t. aaltonen _ et al .
_ [ cdf collaboration ] , `` forward - backward asymmetry in top quark production in ppbar collisions at sqrts=1.96 tev , '' phys . rev .
* 101 * ( 2008 ) 202001 .
[ arxiv:0806.2472 [ hep - ex ] ] .
v. m. abazov _ et al . _
[ d0 collaboration ] , `` first measurement of the forward - backward charge asymmetry in top quark pair production , '' phys .
* 100 * ( 2008 ) 142002 .
[ arxiv:0712.0851 [ hep - ex ] ] .
i. dorsner , s. fajfer , j. f. kamenik , n. kosnik , `` light colored scalars from grand unification and the forward - backward asymmetry in t t - bar production , '' phys .
* d81 * ( 2010 ) 055009 .
[ arxiv:0912.0972 [ hep - ph ] ] .
|
high energy physics community unanimous standard model sm ) incomplete for reasons higgs mass instability unexplained hierarchy in masses fermionic sector impossible to deny enormous unexpected experimental success after years scrutiny new physics search lep lhc sm not seriously challenged by collider experiments exception @xmath0 deviation reported by cdf in top - quark forward - backward asymmetry ( @xmath1)@xcite process involves top quark interesting due to mass near electroweak scale suspected plays special rle natural candidate to explain deviation in @xmath1 is axigluon other alternatives beyond sm considered in @xcite expected axigluon signal @xcite argued signal not explained by axigluon due to experimental constraints bai hewett kaplan rizzo argued heavy broad axigluon viable explanation of @xmath1 invisible in dijet spectrum @xcite parameterize axigluon interaction as @xmath2 @xmath3 is usual qcd coupling constant @xmath4 measures deviation of axigluon coupling constant from qcdevade experimental constraint consider @xmath4 take different values for light quarks @xmath5 top quark @xmath6 ) analysis in @xcite shows broad axigluon must occur @xmath7 escape detection contact interaction must happen @xmath8 non - universality reported in @xcite ) @xmath9 must be negative reproduce sign @xmath1 construction model conditions different coupling constants for different generations difficult authors @xcite propose two - site model include exotic vector - like quarks satisfy @xmath8 constrain paper address construction viable axigluon model not adding new fermions extending gauge sector section effective model based on @xmath10 four octet fields transforming as gauge bosons structure desire features axigluon essential characteristics effective model from four - site model with delocalized fermions summary summarize conclusions recalling effective extended chiral model proposed@xcite consider usual @xmath11 with two pairs vectors fields @xmath12 transforming as gauge fields @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 transforming fields @xmath17gauge sector model including non - linear sigma breaking @xmath11 to @xmath18 described by lagrangian @xmath19 @xmath20\\ g_{r\mu\nu \partial_{\mu}r_{\nu}-}r_-ig_{r}\left[r r_{\nu}\right]\\ \rho_{l\mu\nu }\partial_{\mu}l_{\nu}-}l_{-ig'_{l}\left[l l_{\nu}\right]\\\rho_{r\mu\nu\partial_{\mu}r_{\nu--ig'_{r}\left[r r_{\nu}\right]\\ d_{\mu}u\partial_{\mu}u - ig_{l}l_{\mu}u+ig_{r}ur_{\mu}\end{aligned} unitary gauge non - diagonal mass matrix generated diagonalized assume @xmath21 write results @xmath22 eigenvalues masses physical states are : @xmath23 physical spectrum massless gluon axigluon heavy gluon axigluonnormalized mass eigenvectors written as @xmath24 two fields transform as gauge fields for each group ( @xmath12 @xmath25 ) combination form @xmath27 and @xmath28 @xmath29 new arbitrary parameter different values in right left sectors assume same in both cases structure construct generalized covariant derivatives lagrangian describing gauge interaction of quarks written as @xmath30 lagrangian mylagferm definition physical fields terms of lagrangian gluon axigluon to quarks @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 mechanism related with fermion delocalization in deconstruction theory axigluon with modified coupling to quarks value of @xmath4 varies from generation satisfy conditions @xmath8 constrain for making axigluon compatible with existing data explain @xmath1 data from cdf key features model two pairs of vector bosons transform like gauge fields delocalized fermions properties implemented in four - site model construction subject of next section four site model based on gauge group @xmath34 three link fields ( @xmath35 ) shown in figurescalar fields develop vacuum expectation values @xmath38 @xmath39 ) gauge symmetry to @xmath18 usual color group lagrangian bosonic sector written as @xmath40 @xmath41\\ d\mu}\sigma_1 =\sigma_1 -iga{1\mu\sigma_1 + ig\sigma_1{2\mu -iga{2\mu}u_{3\mu\sigma_2 =\sigma_2 -iga_{3\mu}\sigma_2 + ig\sigma_2_{4\mu}{aligned groups share same coupling constant @xmath42 unitary gauge @xmath43 ) non - diagonal mass matrix for bosons appears mass matrix can be diagonalized work in limit where @xmath44 physical spectrum massless gluon @xmath45 light proportional to @xmath46 axigluon @xmath47 two degenerate heavy states @xmath48 and @xmath49 ) with masses proportional to @xmath50 original gauge fields written @xmath51 attention to quarks fermions coupled to linear combination of gauge bosons deconstruction theory to `` fermion delocalization ''idea of fermion delocalization @xcite low energy properties color interaction quarks originate from contribution sites underlying gauge group current couples to gauge fields @xmath52 with @xmath53 preserve gauge invariance in figure couple left handed quarks to @xmath54 @xmath55 weights @xmath56 @xmath57 right handed to @xmath58 @xmath59 weights interaction lagrangian for quarks written as @xmath60+\left}_4+(1-x}_2\right{aligned @xmath61 and @xmath62 are quark left - handed and right - handed currents chosen same delocalization parameter @xmath56 for right and left handed quarks interaction lagrangian written as @xmath63 where @xmath64 is usual strong interaction coupling constant delocalization pattern axigluon interaction depends on delocalization parameter @xmath56 different quark generations differently delocalized select appropriated values of @xmath56 for top and light quarks explain @xmath1 measurementsshown extended chiral color model with extra octet spin-1 fields axigluon coupling to quarks consistent with dijet contact interactions @xmath1 anomaly reported cdf effective model re - obtained from four - site model interesting theoretical related to five dimensional models supported by fondecyt grant 1070880 conicyt grant southern theoretical physics laboratory act-91 instituto estudios act-119 fondecyt grant 1110167 aaltonen forward - backward asymmetry in top quark production ppbar collisions at sqrts=1.96 tev phys . rev . 101 2008 ) 202001 arxiv:0806.2472 - m abazov first measurement of forward - backward charge asymmetry in top quark pair production phys . 100 2008 ) 142002 arxiv:0712.0851 i. dorsner s. fajfer j f. kamenik n. kosnik light colored scalars from grand unification forward - backward asymmetry in - bar production phys . d81 2010 ) 055009 arxiv:0912.0972
| 0.438417
| 2,945
| 1,568
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,364
|
we study the role of the monopole for color confinement by using the monopole current system . for the self - energy of the monopole current less than ln@xmath0 , long and complicated monopole
world - lines appear and the wilson loop obeys the area law , and therefore the monopole current system almost reproduces essential features of confinement properties in the long - distance physics . in the short - distance physics , however , the monopole - current theory would become nonlocal due to the monopole size effect .
this monopole size would provide a critical scale of qcd in terms of the dual higgs mechanism .
|
color confinement can be interpreted using the dual version of the superconductivity@xcite-@xcite . in this picture ,
condensation of color magnetic monopoles is the key concept and leads to squeezing of the color - electric flux between quarks through the dual meissner effect .
qcd is reduced into an abelian gauge theory with monopoles in the t hooft abelian gauge@xcite-@xcite . as for the maximally abelian ( ma ) gauge
, recent lattice studies suggest that only abelian gauge fields with monopoles are essential for description of nonperturbative phenomena in the infrared region@xcite-@xcite .
we study the role of monopoles for confinement using a monopole action . in the confinement phase ,
only short - range interactions remain among monopoles@xcite due to the _ screening effect _
@xcite by the dual higgs mechanism , and therefore the infrared monopole - current dynamics would be described by a simple action@xcite , @xmath1@xmath2@xmath3@xmath4@xmath5 in the lattice formalism . here ,
@xmath6@xmath7@xmath8*z * and @xmath3@xmath7@xmath9@xmath10@xmath11 denote the magnetic current and its self - energy on the lattice , respectively . the monopole current system is generated with the current conservation condition , @xmath12 .
here , we update the _ link _ of the monopole current using the metropolis method .
we show in fig.1 the monopole density @xmath13@xmath7@xmath14 with the lattice volume @xmath15@xmath2@xmath16 and the clustering parameter @xmath17@xmath18 , where @xmath19 denotes the loop length of the @xmath20-th monopole cluster . with increasing @xmath21 , the monopole density @xmath13
is reduced gradually for @xmath22@xmath23@xmath24 .
the clustering parameter is drastically changed at @xmath24 .
quantitatively , the critical value of monopole self - energy , @xmath24@xmath25@xmath26 , is close to @xmath27@xmath25@xmath28 , which is derived from the entropy factor @xmath29 in the 4-dimensional self - avoiding random walk@xcite .
such a transition is quite similar to the kosterlitz - thouless type transition in 1 + 2-dimensional superconductors .
vortex condensation at high temperature in the superconductor corresponds to monopole condensation in the strong coupling region of qcd .
in this section , we study confinement properties in the monopole current system with @xmath30@xmath31@xmath32 and @xmath33@xmath2@xmath32 , which is the dual version of qed . to estimate the abelian wilson loop , we introduce the dual gauge field @xmath34 , since the gauge field @xmath35 inevitably includes the singularity as the dirac string in the presence of magnetic monopoles . using the relations @xmath36 and @xmath37@xmath2@xmath38@xmath39@xmath40 the dual gauge field @xmath41
can be described from the monopole current @xmath30 , @xmath42 in the dual landau gauge @xmath43 .
the wilson loop is obtained as @xmath44 in estimating the integral in eq.([eq : dual ] ) numerically , we should take _ a finer mesh than original lattice spacing @xmath45 _ to extract @xmath41 correctly . otherwise , the unexpected electric currents appear as the lattice artifact . however , too finer mesh is not necessary , because the original current @xmath46 includes the error in the order of @xmath45 .
numerical analyses show that the calculation with @xmath47 is good enough for the estimation of @xmath41 , and hence we take @xmath48 hereafter . on lattices , the dual gauge field @xmath49 is defined in the dual landau gauge ; @xmath50 using the lattice coulomb propagator @xmath51 . the dual version of the abelian field strength @xmath52 is defined by @xmath53 where @xmath54 denotes the backward derivative .
as shown in fig.2 , the wilson loop @xmath55 exhibits the area law , which leads to the linear confinement potential . in fig.3 , we show the string tension @xmath56 in the lattice unit . for @xmath21@xmath57@xmath24 ,
the string tension is finite due to the long monopole currents , the current simulations for @xmath21@xmath58@xmath24 indicate that @xmath59@xmath25@xmath32 in the system without monopole currents . on the other hand ,
lattice qcd simulations show that the long monopole currents cover the whole system and string tension is finite in the confinement phase even for the large @xmath60 as @xmath61@xmath62@xmath63 on @xmath64 lattices .
therefore , the monopole self - energy @xmath21 extracted from qcd must be smaller than @xmath24@xmath7 ln(@xmath65 ) = ln7 in the confinement phase . here , to extract the monopole action , one should use the monopole part in qcd , where only monopole currents exist . since the electric current and the short - range coulomb force can not be expressed only by the monopole currents ,
it is dangerous to compare the monopole action with the full su(2 ) qcd ( or the abelian part ) ; the former includes monopole currents only , while the latter includes also electric currents and coulomb force . in any case , _ the monopole action is to be extracted from the monopole part in qcd and the monopole self - energy @xmath21 should be smaller than @xmath24=ln7 in the confinement phase . _
the aim of our study is to analyze the theoretical structure of qcd in terms of the monopole degrees of freedom .
our studies indicate that the multi - monopole system has a similar structure to qcd in the ma gauge . however , the monopole in abelian - projected qcd has the underlying structure reflecting qcd .
for instance , qcd - monopoles would be as _ extended objects _ like hadrons@xcite , because it is not an elementary particle in qcd , but a _ collective mode composed by gluons_. we compare the monopole current system with qcd @xcite especially in terms of the self - energy and the size of monopoles@xcite . in the static frame of the monopole with an intrinsic radius @xmath66
, the spherical magnetic field is created around the monopole as @xmath67 for @xmath68 and @xmath69 for @xmath70@xmath71@xmath66 , with qcd running gauge coupling @xmath72@xcite . for @xmath45@xmath73@xmath66 ,
the electromagnetic energy observed on the lattice around a monopole is roughly estimated as @xmath74@xmath25@xmath75@xmath25@xmath76 which largely depends on the lattice mesh @xmath45 .
hence , the monopole contribution to the lattice action reads @xmath77@xmath2@xmath78@xmath10@xmath79 , where @xmath79 denotes the monopole current length measured in the lattice unit @xmath45 .
therefore , @xmath80 is related to the monopole - current coupling @xmath3 and @xmath60@xmath2@xmath81 , @xmath82@xmath25@xmath78@xmath25@xmath83@xmath2@xmath84@xmath10@xmath85 by the screening effect , this relation becomes @xmath82@xmath25@xmath86@xmath10@xmath87@xcite , which is consistent with the numerical result as shown in fig.3 .
thus , as long as the mesh is large as @xmath45@xmath73@xmath66 , the lattice monopole action would not need modification by the monopole size effect , and @xmath3 is proportional to @xmath60 .
on the other hand , there exists a critical coupling @xmath24@xmath25@xmath887 in the current dynamics . above @xmath24 ,
the lattice current action provides no monopole condensation and no confinement , while @xmath60@xmath89@xmath90 can be taken in the original qcd keeping the confinement property shown in fig.3 .
such a discrepancy between @xmath60 and @xmath21 can be naturally interpreted by introducing the monopole size effect , which should lead the nonlinear correspondence between @xmath21 and @xmath60 . for @xmath21@xmath91@xmath66 , the extended structure of the monopole
can be observed on the lattice , and the monopole creates the electromagnetic energy @xmath74 @xmath25@xmath92@xmath2@xmath93 on the lattice , which is almost @xmath45-independent .
accordingly , the lattice action should be changed as @xmath1@xmath2@xmath94@xmath10@xmath95 because of the self - avoidness originating from the monopole size @xmath66 .
thus , the monopole - current theory becomes nonlocal in the uv region .
the monopole size @xmath66 provides a critical scale for the description of qcd in terms of the dual higgs mechanism . in the infrared region as @xmath45@xmath73@xmath66 , qcd can be approximated as a local monopole - current action@xcite , and the qcd vacuum can be regarded as the dual superconductor . on the other hand , in the ultraviolet region as @xmath45<@xmath66 ,
the monopole theory becomes nonlocal and complicated due to the monopole size effect , and the perturbative qcd would be applicable instead .
y. nambu , phys .
* d10 * ( 1974 ) 4262 . g. t hooft , nucl .
* b190 * ( 1981 ) 455 .
z. f. ezawa and a. iwazaki , phys .
* d25 * ( 1982 ) 2681 ; * d26 * ( 1982 ) 631 .
h. suganuma , s. sasaki and h. toki , nucl .
* b435 * ( 1995 ) 207 .
h. ichie , h. suganuma and h. toki , phys .
+ rev.*d52 * ( 1995 ) 2994 ; * d54 * ( 1996 ) 3382 .
m. i. polikarpov , nucl .
* b * ( proc.suppl . ) * 53 * ( 1997 ) 134 and references therein .
o. miyamura , phys . lett .
* b353 * ( 1995 ) 91 .
h. suganuma , a. tanaka , s. sasaki and o. miyamura nucl . phys.*b * ( proc . suppl . ) * 47 * ( 1996 ) 302 .
h. suganuma _ et al .
_ , this proceedings .
j.d.stack , nucl . phys .
* b * ( ps ) * 53 * ( 97 ) 524
. h. ichie , h. suganuma and a. tanaka , hep - lat/9709111 , nucl .
phys . * a * in press .
h. ichie and h. suganuma , proc . of insam symp .
96 , insam report , hep - lat/9709109 .
|
color confinement interpreted dual version superconductivity@xcite- condensation of color magnetic monopoles key leads to squeezing color - electric flux between quarks dual meissner effect qcd reduced into abelian gauge theory with monopoles abelian gauge- studies suggest abelian gauge fields with monopoles essential for nonperturbative phenomena infrared region- study role monopoles for confinement monopole action confinement phase short - range interactions remain among monopoles due screening effect dual higgs mechanism infrared monopole - current dynamics described by simple action@xcite lattice formalism @xmath6 denote magnetic current self - energy on lattice monopole current system generated with current conservation condition @xmath12 update monopole current using metropolis method fig.1 monopole density @xmath13 lattice volume @xmath15 clustering parameter loop length of-th monopole cluster increasing @xmath21 monopole density reduced for clustering parameter changed at @xmath24critical value monopole self - energy close to derived from entropy factor @xmath29 4-dimensional self - avoiding random walk@xcite transition similar to kosterlitz - thouless transition in 1 2-dimensional superconductors vortex condensation high temperature corresponds to monopole condensation strong coupling region qcd study confinement properties monopole current system with @xmath30 dual version of qed estimate abelian wilson loop dual gauge field @xmath34 includes singularity magnetic monopoles relations @xmath36 dual gauge field @xmath41 described from monopole current @xmath30 dual landau gauge @xmath43 wilson loop obtained as @xmath44 finer mesh than original lattice spacing @xmath45 to extract @xmath41 unexpected electric currents appear as lattice artifact finer mesh not necessary original current @xmath46 includes error order @xmath45 calculation with @xmath47 good for estimation @xmath41 take @xmath48 hereafterlattices dual gauge field @xmath49 defined landau gauge @xmath50 lattice coulomb propagator @xmath51 dual abelian field strength @xmath52 defined @xmath53 @xmath54 backward derivative wilson loop @xmath55 exhibits area law linear confinement potential.3 string tension @xmath56 lattice unit @xmath21 string tension finite long monopole currents simulations indicate without monopole currents lattice qcd simulations show long monopole currents cover system string tension finite confinement phase large lattices monopole self - energy @xmath21 qcd smaller than @xmath24@xmath7 = ln7 confinement phase extract monopole action use monopole part qcd monopole currents electric current short - range coulomb force monopole currents dangerous compare monopole action full su(2 qcd abelian part includes monopole currents electric currents coulomb force monopole action extracted from monopole part qcd monopole self - energy @xmath21 smaller than @xmath24=ln7 confinement phaseaim study theoretical structure qcd monopole degrees freedom studies indicate multi - monopole system similar structure to qcd ma gauge monopole in abelian - projected qcd structure reflecting qcd qcd - monopoles extended objects like hadrons@xcite not elementary particle collective mode gluons compare monopole current system with qcd @xcite self - energy size monopoles frame monopole radius @xmath66 spherical magnetic field created around monopole as @xmath67 @xmath69 qcd running gauge coupling @xmath72@xcite @xmath45@xmath66 electromagnetic energy lattice around monopole estimated as @xmath74@xmath25 depends on lattice mesh @xmath45 monopole contribution to lattice action reads @xmath77@xmath2@xmath79 @xmath79 monopole current length lattice unit @xmath45 @xmath80 related to monopole - current coupling @xmath3 relation becomes @xmath82@xmath25@xcite consistent with numerical result fig.3mesh large @xmath45 lattice monopole action modification monopole size effect @xmath3 proportional to @xmath60 critical coupling @xmath24@xmath25@xmath887 in current dynamics above @xmath24 lattice current action no monopole condensation no confinement @xmath60 original qcd confinement fig.3 discrepancy between @xmath60 @xmath21 monopole size effect nonlinear correspondence between for @xmath21@xmath91@xmath66 extended structure monopole on lattice creates electromagnetic energy @xmath74 @xmath25 lattice @xmath45-independent lattice action changed as @xmath1@xmath2@xmath94@xmath95 self - avoidness monopole size @xmath66 monopole - current theory nonlocal in uv region monopole size @xmath66 critical scale for qcd dual higgs mechanism infrared region @xmath45 qcd local monopole - current action qcd vacuum dual superconductor ultraviolet region @xmath45<@xmath66 monopole theory nonlocal complicated due to monopole size effect perturbative qcd applicablenambu phys . d10 1974 ) 4262 hooft nucl b190 1981 ) 455 ezawa iwazaki phys . d25 1982 ) 2681 d26 1982 ) 631 suganuma sasaki h. toki nucl b435 1995 ) 207 h ichie suganuma toki . rev.*d52 1995 ) 2994 d54 1996 ) 3382 polikarpov nucl. proc.suppl . 53 1997 ) 134 references miyamura . b353 1995 ) 91 suganuma tanaka sasaki miyamura nucl. proc suppl. 47 1996 ) 302 suganuma al proceedings j.d.stack nucl . 53 ( 97 ) 524 ichie suganuma tanaka hep - lat/9709111 nucl phys . press ichie suganuma insam symp . 96 report hep - lat/9709109
| 0.35779
| 2,664
| 1,304
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,370
|
on dfinit un oprateur agissant sur des processus stochastiques , qui tend la drivation classique sur les fonctions dterministes diffrentiables .
on utilise cet oprateur pour dfinir une procdure associant aux oprateurs diffrentiels et quations diffrentielles ordinaires leurs analogues stochastiques .
elle est appele plongement stochastique .
en plongeant les systmes lagrangiens , nous obtenons une quation deuler - lagrange stochastique , qui dans le cas des systmes lagrangiens naturels est appele quation de newton plonge .
cette dernire contient lquation de newton stochastique introduite par nelson dans sa thorie dynamique des diffusions browniennes .
enfin , on considre une diffusion drift gradient , coefficient de diffusion constant et possdant une densit de probabilit . on dmontre alors
quune condition ncessaire pour que cette diffusion soit solution de lquation de newton plonge , est que sa densit soit le carr du module dune fonction donde solution dune quation de schrdinger linaire .
_ pour citer cet article : a. nom1 , a. nom2 , c. r. acad .
sci .
paris , ser .
i 340 ( 2005 ) .
_ 0.5 * abstract * 0.5*stochastic embedding of lagrangian systems . * we define an operator which extends classical differentiation from smooth deterministic functions to certain stochastic processes .
based on this operator , we define a procedure which associates a stochastic analog to standard differential operators and ordinary differential equations .
we call this procedure stochastic embedding . by embedding lagrangian systems
, we obtain a stochastic euler - lagrange equation which , in the case of natural lagrangian systems , is called the embedded newton equation .
this equation contains the stochastic newton equation introduced by nelson in his dynamical theory of brownian diffusions .
finally , we consider a diffusion with a gradient drift , a constant diffusion coefficient and having a probability density function .
we prove that a necessary condition for this diffusion to solve the embedded newton equation is that its density be the square of the modulus of a wave function solution of a linear schrdinger equation .
_ to cite this article : a. nom1 , a. nom2 , c. r. acad .
sci .
paris , ser .
i 340 ( 2005 ) . _ probability theory / dynamical systems ,
|
on note @xmath0a , b[$ ] o @xmath1 et @xmath2 $ ] ladhrence de @xmath3 dans @xmath4 .
soit @xmath5 un corps et @xmath6 . on se donne un espace probabilis @xmath7 sur lequel existent une
famille croissante de tribus @xmath8 et une famille dcroissante de tribus @xmath9 .
suivant yasue @xcite , on introduit la on note @xmath10 lensemble des processus @xmath11 dfinis sur @xmath12 , valeurs dans @xmath13 et tels que : @xmath11 soit @xmath14 et @xmath15 adapt , pour tout @xmath16 @xmath17 , lapplication @xmath18 de @xmath19 dans @xmath20 est continue , pour tout @xmath21 les quantits @xmath22 $ ] , et @xmath23 $ ] , existent dans @xmath20 , et enfin les applications @xmath24 et @xmath25 sont continues de @xmath3 dans @xmath20 .
+ le complt de @xmath26 pour la norme @xmath27 , est encore not @xmath10 , et simplement @xmath28 quand @xmath29 .
les quantits @xmath30 et @xmath31 sont introduites par edward nelson dans sa thorie dynamique des diffusions browniennes ( _ _ cf__@xcite ) .
soit @xmath32 linjection @xmath33 . on note : @xmath34 .
le problme dextension consiste trouver un oprateur @xmath35 satisfaisant : * ( recollement ) @xmath36 sur @xmath37 , * ( @xmath4-linarit ) @xmath38 est @xmath4-linaire , * ( reconstruction ) si lon note @xmath39 o @xmath40 et @xmath41 sont des @xmath4-formes linraires , on suppose que lapplication de @xmath42 dans @xmath42 : @xmath43 est inversible .
loprateur @xmath38 tend donc la drivation classique ( _ cf_(i ) ) en un oprateur linaire ( _ cf_(ii ) ) sur @xmath28 et la connaissance de @xmath44 induit celle de @xmath45 et @xmath46 ( _ cf_(iii ) ) .
on obtient : les seuls oprateurs @xmath47 vrifiant ( i ) , ( ii ) et ( iii ) sont : @xmath48 on crira @xmath49 et @xmath50 .
la dfinition des itrs de @xmath38 et @xmath51 ncessite lextension de ces oprateurs aux processus valeur complexe .
dans la suite , on tend @xmath38 et @xmath51 par @xmath52linarit aux processus complexes , _
i.e. _ pour tous @xmath53 , @xmath54 . .
on note @xmath55 lensemble des processus @xmath56 tels que pour tout @xmath57 , @xmath58 existe en tout point de @xmath3 .
on donne la dfinition ( [ bonnesdiffusions ] ) un ensemble @xmath59 qui permet de montrer que @xmath28 nest pas trivial . en effet @xmath60 ( _ cf _ @xcite p.26 ) .
le calcul de @xmath61 combine de faon non triviale les quantits @xmath30 et @xmath31 .
titre dexemple , on obtient sur @xmath62 , @xmath63 .
la partie relle de @xmath64 concide donc avec lacclration postule par nelson comme quantit la plus pertinente pour dcrire une notion dacclration pour une diffusion brownienne ( cf @xcite p.@xmath65 ) .
en utilisant @xmath66 , on construit des analogues stochastiques doprateurs diffrentiels non linaires .
[ stochastisation ] [ stoca ] on appelle plongement stochastique , relatif lextension @xmath67 , dun oprateur @xmath68 qui scrit sous la forme : @xmath69 avec @xmath70 , @xmath71 , loprateur @xmath72 agissant sur @xmath55 .
+ un oprateur @xmath68 crit sous la forme : @xmath73 @xmath74 , est plong en @xmath75 agissant sur un sous - ensemble de @xmath28 dpendant de certaines proprits de @xmath76 .
un oprateur de la forme @xmath77 peut se rcrire @xmath78 qui se plonge alors en @xmath79 .
ce dernier nest gal @xmath80 que dans certains cas ( cf @xcite p.@xmath81 ) .
ceci montre en particulier que le plongement stochastique nest pas une application , il dpend du choix dcriture de loprateur .
la notion de plongement doprateur stend de faon naturelle celle de plongement dquation dfinie par un oprateur @xmath68 dordre @xmath82 : @xmath83 . on dfinit
lquation plonge par : @xmath84 o @xmath85 .
on soccupe dsormais du cas lagrangien . on appelle lagrangien admissible une fonction @xmath86 de classe @xmath87 en sa premire variable @xmath88 et holomorphe en sa deuxime variable @xmath89 , et relle quand @xmath89 est relle .
lquation @xmath90 sappelle quation deuler - lagrange .
soit @xmath91 un lagrangien admissible .
le plongement stochastique de ( [ el ] ) est donn par @xmath92 on sait que lquation ( [ el ] ) provient dun principe de moindre action ( cf @xcite p.@xmath93 ) .
existe - il un principe de moindre action stochastique permettant lobtention de lquation ( [ els ] ) ?
nous montrons dans @xcite chap.@xmath94 que tel est bien le cas et on donne un lemme montrant la cohrence de la procdure de plongement vis - - vis des principes de moindre action ainsi dfinis .
considrons le lagrangien admissible @xmath95 o @xmath96 et @xmath97 est une fonction de classe @xmath87 .
lquation ( [ el ] ) associe est lquation de newton @xmath98 . lquation de newton plonge est alors @xmath99 et concide avec lquation deuler - lagrange plonge ( [ els ] ) .
on se propose dtudier un rsultat sur la densit dun processus solution de cette quation .
on donne dans @xcite p.@xmath100 , suivant @xcite et @xcite , un espace sur lequel nous pourrons calculer les drives du premier ordre @xmath30 et @xmath31 et les drives du second ordre @xmath101 , @xmath102 , @xmath103 et @xmath104 .
prenons @xmath1050,1[$ ] .
soit @xmath106 un mouvement brownien standard dans @xmath107 dfini sur un espace probabilis filtr @xmath108 .
* @xmath11 est solution sur @xmath19 de leds : @xmath109 o @xmath110 , @xmath111 et @xmath112 sont des fonctions mesurables vrifiant lhypothse : il existe une constante @xmath113 telle que pour tous @xmath114 : + @xmath115 et @xmath116 , * pour tout @xmath16 , @xmath117 possde une densit @xmath118 en @xmath119 , * en posant @xmath120 , pour tout @xmath121 , pour tout @xmath122 , pour tout ouvert born @xmath123 , * les fonctions @xmath124 et @xmath125 appartiennent @xmath126 , sont bornes et toutes leurs drives du premier et second ordre sont bornes . on notera @xmath127 ( resp .
@xmath128 ) le sous - ensemble de @xmath59 form par les diffusions do nt le coefficient est constant gal @xmath129 ( resp . do nt le drift est un gradient ) , et on pose @xmath130 .
si @xmath140 alors il existe des fonctions @xmath141 et @xmath142 diffrentiables sur @xmath143 telles que + @xmath144 car @xmath145 et @xmath124 est un gradient . on choisit @xmath146 .
les fonctions @xmath141 et @xmath142 sont galement introduites par nelson dans @xcite p.@xmath147 .
+ on pose @xmath148 et @xmath149 .
* dmonstration . * des expressions @xmath149 et @xmath154 , on dduit + @xmath155 .
lquation de newton plonge peut scrire @xmath156 car @xmath97 est rel . + or @xmath157 .
donc @xmath158 et avec ( [ deriv_fonc ] ) il vient + @xmath159 .
le lemme de schwarz donne : + @xmath160 , et @xmath161 $ ] , et par consquent : + @xmath162 .
en intgrant sur @xmath143 les fonctions des deux membres de la dernire quation , il apparat des constantes quon peut rendre nulles en ajoutant une fonction de @xmath163 convenable dans @xmath142 .
le rsultat sen dduit .
la partie relle de lquation de newton plonge concide avec lquation de newton stochastique propose par nelson dans sa thorie dynamique des diffusions browniennes ( @xcite p.@xmath165 ) .
sa partie imaginaire correspond lquation @xmath166 .
nous conjecturons que cette dernire impose que le drift de @xmath11 doit tre un gradient , et donc quil nest pas utile de le supposer dans le thorme ( [ schro ] ) . 7 arnold v.i . , _ mathematical methods of classical mechanics _ , 2d edition , springer , 1989 .
cresson j. , darses s. , stochastic embedding of dynamical systems , arxiv : math.pr/0509713 , 112.p , 2005 .
millet a , nualart d. , sanz m. , integration by parts and time reversal for diffusion processes , annals of probability 1989 , vol .
17 , no . 1 , 208 - 238 .
nelson e. , _ dynamical theories of brownian motion _ , second edition , princeton , 2001 .
thieullen m. , second order stochastic differential equations and non - gaussian reciprocal diffusions , proba . theory and rel .
fields 97 , 231 - 257 ( 1993 ) .
yasue k , stochastic calculus of variations , journal of functional analysis 41 , 327 - 340 ( 1981 ) .
|
note @xmath0a @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 corps @xmath6 espace probabilis @xmath7 famille croissante tribus @xmath8 tribus @xmath9 introduit note @xmath10 processus @xmath11 @xmath12 valeurs @xmath13 @xmath11 @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 continue @xmath21 quantits @xmath22 @xmath23 existent @xmath20 applications @xmath24 @xmath25 continues @xmath3 @xmath20 complt @xmath26 norme @xmath27 @xmath10 @xmath28 @xmath29 quantits @xmath30 @xmath31 introduites edward nelson thorie dynamique diffusions browniennes @xmath32 @xmath33 note @xmath34 problme oprateur @xmath35 satisfaisant recollement @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath4-linaire reconstruction @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath4-formes linraires @xmath42 dans @xmath42 @xmath43 inversible@xmath38 tend drivation classique en oprateur linaire sur @xmath28 connaissance de @xmath44 induit @xmath45 @xmath46 seuls oprateurs @xmath47 sont @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 dfinition de @xmath38 @xmath51 ncessite lextension oprateurs aux processus valeur complexe tend @xmath38 @xmath51 par @xmath52linarit aux processus complexes pour @xmath53 @xmath54 note @xmath55 des processus @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 existe @xmath3 dfinition ensemble @xmath59 @xmath28 pas trivial @xmath60 p.26 calcul de @xmath61 combine quantits @xmath30 @xmath31 obtient sur @xmath62 , @xmath63 partie de @xmath64 concide avec lacclration par nelson pertinente pour dcrire notion diffusion brownienne utilisant @xmath66 construit analogues stochastiques doprateurs diffrentiels non linairesstochastisation plongement stochastique @xmath67 oprateur @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath55 oprateur @xmath68 @xmath73 @xmath74 plong en @xmath75 sous - ensemble @xmath28 proprits @xmath76 oprateur @xmath77 @xmath78 plonge en @xmath79 @xmath80 certains cas@xmath81 plongement stochastique application dpend choix dcriture loprateur notion plongement doprateur dquation dfinie oprateur @xmath68 @xmath82 @xmath83 plonge par @xmath84 o @xmath85 cas lagrangien lagrangien admissible fonction @xmath86 @xmath87 variable @xmath88 holomorphe deuxime variable @xmath89 relle @xmath89 relle lquation @xmath90 quation deuler - lagrange @xmath91 lagrangien admissible plongement stochastique ( [ el ] ) par @xmath92 lquation principe moindre action @xcite.@xmath93 principe de moindre action stochastique lquation ( [ els ] ) ? @xcite chap.@xmath94 donne lemme cohrence procdure plongement principes moindre action lagrangien admissible @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 fonction classe @xmath87 lquation associe lquation newton @xmath98 lquation newton plonge @xmath99 concide lquation deuler - lagrange plonge ) propose dtudier rsultat densit processus solution quation @xcite@xmath100 espace calculer drives premier ordre @xmath30 @xmath31 second ordre @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath104 prenons @xmath1050,1[$ ] @xmath106 mouvement brownien standard @xmath107 espace probabilis @xmath108 @xmath11 solution @xmath19 @xmath109 @xmath110 @xmath111 @xmath112 fonctions mesurables constante @xmath113 @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath116 @xmath16 @xmath117 densit @xmath118 @xmath119 @xmath120 @xmath121 @xmath122 @xmath123 fonctions @xmath124 @xmath125 appartiennent @xmath126 bornes drives premier second ordre bornes notera @xmath127@xmath128 sous - ensemble @xmath59 diffusions coefficient constant @xmath129 drift gradient pose @xmath130 @xmath140 fonctions @xmath141 @xmath142 diffrentiables sur @xmath143 + @xmath144 @xmath145 @xmath124 gradient choisit @xmath146 fonctions @xmath141 @xmath142 introduites par nelson @xcite p.@xmath147 pose @xmath148 @xmath149 expressions @xmath149 @xmath154 dduit + @xmath155 lquation newton plonge @xmath156 @xmath97 rel @xmath157 @xmath158 + @xmath159 lemme schwarz donne + @xmath160 @xmath161 + @xmath162 intgrant @xmath143 fonctions deux membres quation constantes nulles ajoutant fonction @xmath163 @xmath142 rsultat partie relle lquation newton plonge concide avec lquation newton stochastique nelson thorie dynamique diffusions browniennes @xcite.@xmath165 partie imaginaire correspond lquation @xmath166 drift de @xmath11 gradient pas utile supposer thorme arnoldmathematical methods classical mechanics 2d edition springer 1989 cresson darses stochastic embedding dynamical systems math/0509713 112 2005 millet sanz integration time reversal diffusion annals probability 1989 17 1 208 - 238 nelson dynamical theories brownian motion second edition princeton 2001 thieullen stochastic differential equations non - gaussian diffusions 97 231 - 257 1993 yasue stochastic calculus variations functional analysis 41 327 - 340 1981
| 0.350215
| 2,544
| 1,459
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,376
|
the lateral distribution of muons with threshold energy @xmath0 gev have been studied in showers with energy @xmath1 ev .
the data considered in the analysis have been collected from november 2011 to june 2013 .
experimental values are compared to predictions obtained with the use of corsika code within the framework of various hadron interaction models .
the best agreement between experiment and theory is observed for qgsjetii-04 model . at @xmath2
ev it complies to a mixed cosmic ray composition with the mean atomic number @xmath3 . at @xmath4 ev the composition varies around the value @xmath5 .
|
ultra - high energy ( @xmath6 ev ) cosmic rays ( uhecr ) are still remain a major scientific problem despite being studied worldwide by extensive air shower ( eas ) arrays for good 50 years .
their mass composition is still not known exactly , and without this knowledge it is difficult to understand the character of nuclear interactions in this energy region .
muons with energy near @xmath7 gev are very important component of eas .
they are poorly moderated in the atmosphere , are sensitive to the characteristics of nuclear interactions during development of a shower and to the chemical composition of cosmic rays ( cr ) . due to their yield and properties of lateral distribution
they can be effectively registered with widely spaced ground arrays . since 1978 yakutsk eas array has been continuously registering muons with the threshold energy @xmath8 gev . during this period
a large amount of experimental data has been accumulated .
analysis of this material @xcite has revealed that the development of showers with @xmath9 ev differs significantly from those at lesser energies of cr .
it also allowed us to estimate the fraction of primary gamma - quanta in the total cr flux at energies above @xmath10 ev @xcite .
m@xmath11 ) ; empty blue circles additional scintillation detectors ( @xmath12 m@xmath11 ) ; filled black squares underground muon detectors of @xmath13 m@xmath11 area and @xmath14 gev threshold ; empty black square underground muon detector of @xmath15 m@xmath11 and @xmath16 gev threshold.,scaledwidth=85.0% ] recently we have shown @xcite that the muon fraction in the total number of charged particles in eass with energies @xmath1 ev changes significantly over periods of time . until 1996 , it fluctuated around a single stable position and then increased significantly .
this was accompanied by near simultaneous variations in the energy spectrum and in the global anisotropy of cr within energy range @xmath17 ev @xcite .
after 1996 , during the next 7 years , the integral intensity of cr at @xmath18 ev increased by @xmath19% and then started declining .
as for the phase of the first harmonic @xmath20 and its amplitude @xmath21 sampled during 1983 - 1994 , they changed to values @xmath22 and @xmath23 during 1998 - 2010 . in recent years , a tendency has been manifested towards the change of these values in the opposite direction .
it seems like the effect of some gargantuan explosion which have contributed a significant portion of heavy nuclei to the background .
it s difficult to pinpoint exactly what kind of event in the galaxy could led to such result . here
we need further studies involving temporal factor of the experimental data . in this work we present the results of analyzes of muon data with @xmath8 gev threshold collected during the period from november 2011 to june 2013 .
the geometry of the muon part of the array is shown on fig.[fig:1 ] .
the work @xcite describes the technique of their control and calibration .
the data from the detector with @xmath24 gev @xcite are currently being accumulated and will be analyzed later .
ev and @xmath25 from primary protons ( blue circles ) and iron nuclei ( red squares ) obtained within the framework of the qgsjetii-04 @xcite model.,scaledwidth=85.0% ] further we consider eass with zenith angles @xmath26 and axes fallen within a @xmath27 km radius circle in the center of the array and with the precision of axis detection no less than @xmath28 m. the energy of primary particles was derived from relations : @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the density of charged particles as measured by surface scintillation detectors at @xmath33 m from a shower axis .
the precision of @xmath34 estimation in individual showers was no worse than 10% .
the relation ( [ eq:1 ] ) unambiguously connects the @xmath35 with @xmath36 at any given cr composition .
it is due to the fact that at the distance @xmath37 m from the axis , the lateral distribution functions ( ldf ) of all charged particles inter - cross each other .
it is demonstrated on fig.[fig:2 ] where two ldfs are shown , for charged particles in showers with @xmath38 ev and @xmath25 initiated by primary protons ( blue circles ) and iron nuclei ( red squares ) obtained with the use of qgsjetii-04 model @xcite .
values for @xmath32 were derived from the modified linsley approximation @xcite : @xmath39 where @xmath40 is the molier radius which depends on air temperature ( @xmath41c ) and pressure ( @xmath42 , mbarn ) : @xmath43 the value for @xmath40 is measured in each individual event ( for yakutsk @xmath44c , @xmath45 m ) . in the expression ( [ eq:4 ] ) @xmath46 is the parameter defined in @xcite : @xmath47 ; * ( b ) * the steepness parameter @xmath48 of muon ldf ( @xmath49 gev ) . on both pictures theoretical predictions for primary protons ( p ) and iron nuclei ( fe )
are represented with red ( qgsjetii-04 ) , blue ( qgsjet01d ) and black ( sibyll-2.1 ) lines .
squares experimental values.,scaledwidth=65.0% ] on fig.[fig:3]*(a ) * with black squares are shown muon densities at the distance @xmath50 m from axis of showers within a considered group , with mean values of @xmath36 and @xmath25 .
normalization to primary energy @xmath51 gives a representation of muon data that is more descriptive and convenient for further analysis .
mean ldfs were obtained within energy bins with logarithmic step @xmath52 which were subsequently shifted towards higher energies by @xmath53 .
this procedure was performed for a detailed test of an agreement between the experiment and various hadron interaction models .
@xmath54 values were obtained from approximations of mean ldfs .
when constructing an ldf , muon densities were multiplied by normalizing ratio @xmath55 and averaged over an energy cut in radial bins @xmath56 .
mean muon densities were determined from the expression @xmath57 where @xmath58 and @xmath59 are the numbers of operated muon detectors at axis distances within the interval @xmath60 .
the indexes denote whether a detectors had non - zero @xmath61 or zero @xmath62 readings during the registration of event .
zero readings are related to cases when a detector hasnt registered any muons while being in a wait state .
mean ldfs were approximated according to functions @xcite : @xmath63 with well - known relation by @xcite : @xmath64 where @xmath65 m , @xmath48 is a free parameter .
the best fit values of @xmath46 , @xmath32 in ( [ eq:4 ] ) and @xmath48 , @xmath66 in ( [ eq:9 ] ) were determined with the use of @xmath67 minimization .
error bars on fig.[fig:3]*(a ) * include the entire combination originated from statistics of events and averaging of the data .
lines represent expected values predicted by hadron interaction models qgsjetii-04 ( red ) , qgsjet01d @xcite ( blue ) and sibyll-2.1 @xcite ( black ) .
simulations were performed with the use of corsika code @xcite ( version 6.990 in the case of sibyll-2.1 and qgsjet01d and 7.3700 in the case of qgsjetii-04 ) .
200 showers were simulated per each set of initial shower parameters ( mass of primary particle , energy and zenith angle ) .
to speed - up the computations , the thin - sampling algorithm was activated in the corsika code with the parameters @xmath68 $ ] and @xmath69 $ ] depending on the primary energy @xcite .
the density was calculated directly from total number of particles arrived at a detector of given area .
it is clearly seen that the experiment is not consistent with sibyll at neither given composition ; the model predicts significantly less muon yield .
other two models agree with our experiment much better and allow to estimate the mass composition of primary particles . to simplify , let us consider a two - component composition , consisting of protons and iron nuclei . in this case
the relation @xmath70 gives weighting functions @xmath71 and @xmath72 . within the framework of this hypothesis , according to the qgsjet01d model we have : @xmath73 where @xmath74 are the values obtained in the experiment ( exp ) and in simulation . with red and blue triangles on fig.[fig:4 ] are shown energy dependencies of cr mass composition according to predictions of qgsjetii-04 and qgsjet01d correspondingly . for comparison , on the same figure
the data from various eas experiments are shown .
purple stars denote the results of kascade obtained during the period from may 1998 to december 1999 @xcite .
white diamonds represent the data of tunka-133 obtained from the ldf of cherenkov radiation emitted by eas during two winter observational periods ( 2009 - 2011 ) @xcite .
other values were derived from @xmath75 dependence established in experiments and simulations within the framework of qgsjet01 model , with the use of the expression ( [ eq:11 ] ) with substitution @xmath76 . with green triangles
are shown hires data related to the observational period from november 1999 to september 2001 @xcite .
black circles results from pao obtained between december 2004 and september 2010 @xcite , open circles interpretation of the telescope array data within the framework of qgsjetii model .
gev threshold obtained with the use of qgsjet01d model for primary protons with primary energy @xmath77 ev at @xmath25 .
the line represents approximation ( [ eq:9 ] ) with @xmath78.,scaledwidth=85.0% ] results presented on fig.[fig:4 ] give evidence that in energy region @xmath79 ev the cr composition probably changes rapidly towards lighter nuclei .
our data do not contradict this scenario .
it is seen that qgsjetii-04 model better agrees with the experiment than qgsjet01d , especially in view of the works @xcite , which have demonstrated that at @xmath80 ev the mass composition changes rapidly .
yet , it is still a bit premature to make a strong conclusion both models predict similar shapes of muon ldfs and agree with experiment , as evidenced by the parameter of ldf s steepness @xmath48 shown on fig.[fig:3]*(b)*. experimental values of this parameter confirm the above - mentioned hypothesis about lightening of the cr mass composition with the increase of primary energy .
the ldfs obtained in simulations are well - described by the function ( [ eq:8 ] ) in a wide range of distances from a shower axis .
it is demonstrated on fig.[fig:5 ] where points represent ldf for muons with @xmath81 gev threshold obtained with the use of qgsjet01d model for primary protons with @xmath38 ev and @xmath25 .
line is the approximation of ( [ eq:9 ] ) with steepness parameter @xmath82 found with weighted least square method .
similar picture is observed at other values of initial shower parameters ( i.e. energy , zenith angle and composition ) . and muon density ( at @xmath83 ) normalized to primary energy ( @xmath84 ) .
predictions of qgsjetii-04 ( red squares ) , qgsjet01d ( blue circles ) and sibyll-2.1 ( black triangles ) for primary protons ( open symbols ) and iron nuclei ( filled symbols ) within the energy range @xmath85 ev at @xmath25 .
lines denote linear approximations.,scaledwidth=85.0% ] our estimations of @xmath86 based on the ( [ eq:10 ] ) do not differ drastically from other , more traditional method based on the @xmath87 ( see e.g. , @xcite ) : @xmath88 it is due to some peculiarity of eas muons , which is demonstrated on fig.[fig:6 ] .
it shows that within the framework of any shower development model , between the depth of maximum @xmath87 and the logarithm of muon density normalized to @xmath36 , there is a quasi - linear dependence at any composition of primary particles : @xmath89 if one inserts ( [ eq:13 ] ) into ( [ eq:12 ] ) , then ( [ eq:10 ] ) follows .
the relations visualized on fig.[fig:6 ] allow one to find @xmath90 from muon density normalized to primary energy
. in our case , from the plot on this figure follow the dependencies shown on fig.[fig:7 ] .
this method of extracting the depth of maximum from muon data , in our opinion , is comfortably simple and efficient from practical point of view . with sufficient statistics
it is essentially a fully functional alternative to a technique of @xmath90 determination from the ldf of cherenkov light radiation .
it is possible to use different muon thresholds and distances from shower axis , where muon density is sampled . according to qgsjetii-04 ( red lines ) and qgsjet01d ( blue line ) for primary protons ( p ) and iron nuclei ( fe ) .
red stars and blue crosses represent the interpretation of experimental data within the frameworks of the two models correspondingly.,scaledwidth=85.0% ]
the comparison of the yakutsk array data to modern ultra - high energy interaction models has demonstrated once again the importance that this component presents for studying of shower development and cr mass composition .
the results from fig.[fig:3 ] demonstrate a certain degree of agreement between the experiment and qgsjetii-04 and qgsjet01d models on the whole energy range @xmath91 ev .
estimations of the mean cr mass composition from fig.[fig:4 ] obtained within the frameworks of these models are close enough to worldwide data @xcite .
the qgsjetii-04 model agrees with them better than qgsjet01d .
our data displayed on fig.[fig:4 ] have added to the whole picture that testifies of a rapid change in the cr composition towards lighter nuclei in energy range @xmath92 ev .
it can not be ruled out that at @xmath93 there is a peak of local heaviness of cr composition .
it is seen from fig.[fig:5 ] that ldfs obtained from simulations are well - described by the approximation ( [ eq:8 ] ) within a wide range of distances from shower axis .
this approximation is convenient for comparison between the experimental data and theoretical predictions as seen on fig.[fig:3]*(b)*. fig.[fig:6 ] suggests that muon component contains some possibilities yet to discover . in particular
, it allows to relatively easy determine the depth of maximum eas development ( see fig.[fig:7 ] ) .
we suppose that muons can play a vital role in the energy cross - calibration between world s eas arrays , where there is still no clarity in relation to correctness of any given method of estimating the energy of primary particle .
the work was conducted with the financial support from russian academy of science within the framework of research program `` fundamental properties of matter and astrophysics '' and is supported by rfbr grant # 130212036 ofi - m-2013 .
|
ultra - high energy ( @xmath6 ev ) cosmic rays ) major scientific problem despite studied by air shower arrays for 50 years mass composition not known difficult to understand nuclear interactions muons with energy near @xmath7 gev important eas poorly moderated in atmosphere sensitive to nuclear interactions chemical composition registered with widely spaced ground arrays since 1978 yakutsk eas array registering muons with threshold energy @xmath8 gev large experimental data accumulated analysis development of showers with @xmath9 ev differs from at lesser energies cr fraction primary gamma - quanta in total cr flux at energies above @xmath10 ev empty circles scintillation detectors squares underground muon detectors @xmath13 @xmath14 empty square muon detector @xmath15 @xmath16 muon fraction in total charged particles in eass with energies @xmath1 ev changes significantly over until 1996 fluctuated around increased significantly accompanied by variations in energy spectrum global anisotropy of cr within energy range @xmath17 ev1996 7 years intensity cr @xmath18 increased @xmath19% started declining first harmonic @xmath20 amplitude @xmath21 1983 - 1994 changed to @xmath22 @xmath23 1998 - 2010 recent years tendency change values opposite direction effect gargantuan explosion heavy nuclei background difficult pinpoint event need further studies temporal factor experimental data results analyzes muon data @xmath8 gev threshold november 2011 to june 2013 geometry muon part array shown fig. describes technique control calibration data detector @xmath24 gev @xcite accumulated analyzed later ev @xmath25 from primary protons iron nuclei obtained qgsjetii-04 @xcite model consider eass with zenith angles @xmath26 axes within @xmath27 km radius center array precision axis detection @xmath28 m energy of primary particles derived from relations @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 density of charged particles measured surface scintillation detectors at @xmath33 m from shower axis precision of @xmath34 estimation showers no 10%relation ( eq:1 ] connects @xmath35 with @xmath36 composition due to distance @xmath37 m from axis lateral distribution functions charged particles - cross demonstrated on fig.:2 two ldfs shown charged particles showers with @xmath38 @xmath25 initiated by primary protons blue iron nuclei red qgsjetii-04 model values @xmath32 derived from modified linsley approximation @xcite : @xmath39 @xmath40 molier radius depends on air temperature pressure value @xmath40 measured in each event expression ( eq:4 ] ) @xmath46 parameter defined in @xcite : @xmath47 steepness parameter @xmath48 of muon ldf ( @xmath49 theoretical predictions for primary protons iron nuclei represented with red blue black lines fig.:3] black squares muon densities at distance @xmath50 m from axis showers mean values of @xmath36 and @xmath25 normalization to primary energy @xmath51 muon data descriptive for analysisldfs obtained energy bins step @xmath52 shifted towards higher energies by @xmath53 for agreement between experiment hadron interaction models @xmath54 values obtained from approximations mean ldfs muon densities multiplied by normalizing ratio @xmath55 averaged over energy cut in radial bins @xmath56 muon densities determined from expression @xmath57 numbers operated muon detectors at axis distances interval @xmath60 indexes denote detectors non - zero or zero @xmath62 readings during registration event zero readings related to cases detector registered muons wait state ldfs approximated to functions @xcite : @xmath63 relation @xcite : @xmath64 free parameter best fit values of @xmath46 @xmath32 determined @xmath67 minimization error bars on fig.:3] include combination from statistics averaging data lines represent expected values predicted by hadron interaction models qgsjetii-04 qgsjet01d sibyll-2.1 simulations performed corsika code @xcite 6.990 200 showers simulated per each initial shower parameters mass energy zenith anglecomputations thin - sampling algorithm activated in corsika code parameters @xmath68 @xmath69 depending primary energy density calculated from particles at detector experiment consistent with sibyll at composition model predicts less muon yield other two models agree experiment estimate mass composition primary particles consider two - component composition protons iron nuclei relation @xmath70 gives weighting functions @xmath71 @xmath72 qgsjet01d model @xmath73 @xmath74 values obtained in experiment simulation red blue triangles on fig:4 shown energy dependencies of cr mass composition predictions qgsjetii-04 qgsjet01d data from eas experiments shown purple stars results kascade may 1998 to december 1999 white diamonds data tunka-133 from cherenkov radiation winter observational periods 2009 - 2011 other values derived from @xmath75 dependence experiments simulations qgsjet01 model expression ( eq:11 ] substitution @xmath76 green triangles shown data observational period november 1999 to september 2001 black circles results from pao december 2004 september 2010 open circles interpretation telescope array data qgsjetii modelgev threshold qgsjet01d model primary protons energy @xmath77 @xmath25 line approximation eq:9 ] @xmath78=85.0% results fig.:4 energy region @xmath79 ev cr composition changes lighter nuclei data contradict qgsjetii-04 model agrees experiment qgsjet01d @xmath80 ev mass composition changes rapidly premature conclusion both models predict similar shapes muon ldfs agree experiment ldf s steepness @xmath48 fig.[fig:3] experimental values confirm hypothesis lightening cr mass composition increase primary energy ldfs simulations described function [ eq:8 ] ) distances shower axis demonstrated fig.[fig:5 points represent ldf muons @xmath81 gev threshold qgsjet01d model primary protons @xmath38 ev @xmath25 line approximation eq:9 ] ) steepness parameter @xmath82 weighted least square method similar initial shower parameters energy zenith angle composition muon density @xmath83 ) normalized primary energy @xmath84 )predictions qgsjetii-04 red squares qgsjet01d blue circles sibyll-2.1 black triangles for primary protons iron nuclei energy range @xmath85 @xmath25 lines denote linear approximations,scaledwidth=85.0% estimations @xmath86 based [ eq:10 ] differ from method @xmath87 @xmath88 due to peculiarity eas muons demonstrated fig.:6 between depth maximum @xmath87 muon density @xmath36 quasi - linear dependence composition primary particles @xmath89 inserts [ eq:13 ] ) into [ eq:12 ] ) [ eq:10 ] ) follows relations fig.:6 allow find @xmath90 from muon density to primary energy plot follow dependencies fig.[fig:7 ] method extracting depth maximum from muon data simple efficient functional alternative to @xmath90 determination from ldf cherenkov light radiation possible use different muon thresholds distances from shower axis muon density qgsjetii-04 red lines qgsjet01d blue line for primary protons iron nuclei red stars blue crosses represent interpretation experimental data two models,scaledwidth=85.comparison yakutsk array data to ultra - high energy interaction models importance for shower development cr mass composition results from fig:3 demonstrate agreement between experiment qgsjetii-04 qgsjet01d models on energy range @xmath91 ev estimations mean cr mass composition close to worldwide data @xcite qgsjetii-04 model agrees better than qgsjet01d data fig:4 rapid change in cr composition towards lighter nuclei in energy range @xmath92 ev at @xmath93 peak of local heaviness cr composition ldfs from simulations - described by approximation (:8 within distances from shower axis approximation convenient for comparison between experimental data theoretical predictions:6 muon component contains possibilities allows determine depth of maximum eas development muons can vital role in energy cross - calibration between eas arrays no clarity method estimating energy of primary particle work conducted with support from russian academy of science research program fundamental properties of matter astrophysics supported by rfbr grant # 130212036 - m-2013
| 0.51188
| 3,471
| 1,747
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,392
|
we have studied the evolution of the shell structure of nuclei near the neutron drip line in the relativistic hartree - bogoliubov ( rhb ) theory with the vector self - coupling of @xmath0 meson .
the experimental data on the shell effects about the waiting - point nucleus @xmath1zn are reproduced successfully .
it is shown that the shell effects at @xmath2 near the r - process path remain strong .
a quenching exhibited by the hfb+skp approach is shown not to be compatible with the available data .
|
the @xmath2 nuclei at r - process path are assumed to play a significant role in providing nuclear abundances about @xmath3 @xcite .
since nuclei contributing to this peak are extremely neutron - rich and are not accessible experimentally , there prevail conflicting view points @xcite on the strength of the shell effects near the neutron drip line . in this work ,
we examine how the shell effects evolve with isospin in the region of the astrophysically important magic number @xmath2 near the neutron drip line . using the experimental data on the waiting - point nucleus @xmath1zn ( @xmath4 )
, we explore the shell effects near the r - process path in the framework of the relativistic hartree - bogoliubov ( rhb ) theory with the vector self - coupling of @xmath0 meson . in this approach ,
the shell effects about the stability line have been described successfully @xcite .
the rmf lagrangian describes the nucleons as dirac spinors moving in meson fields and is given by @xcite @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the bare nucleon mass and @xmath7 is its dirac spinor .
in addition , we have the scalar meson ( @xmath8 ) , isoscalar vector mesons ( @xmath0 ) , isovector vector mesons ( @xmath9 ) and the photons @xmath10 , with the masses @xmath11 , @xmath12 and @xmath13 and the coupling constants @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 , respectively . a nonlinear scalar potential @xmath17 for @xmath8-mesons is used for a realistic description of finite nuclei .
recently , we have also added the non - linear vector self - coupling of @xmath0-meson @xcite which is represented by @xmath18 . for nuclei near a drip line , a coupling to the continuum is required .
a self - consistent treatment of pairing is also necessary .
we employ the framework of rhb theory which takes into account both these features .
the corresponding relativistic dirac - hartree - bogoliubov ( rhb ) equations are obtained as @xmath19 where @xmath20 are quasiparticle energies and the coefficients @xmath21 and @xmath22 are four - dimensional dirac spinors .
the pairing potential @xmath23 in eq .
( [ rhb ] ) is given by @xmath24 the rhb calculations are performed by expanding fermionic and bosonic wavefunctions in 20 oscillator shells for a spherical configuration .
we have used the force nl - sh @xcite with the non - linear scalar self - coupling and the forces nl - sv1 and nl - sv2 with both the scalar and the vector self - couplings .
the forces nl - sv1 and nl - sv2 have recently been developed in order to soften the high - density equation of state of nuclear matter and are shown to improve the ground - state properties of nuclei @xcite .
in our previous work , it was shown that the existing nuclear forces based upon the nonlinear scalar self - coupling of @xmath8-meson exhibit shell effects which were stronger than suggested by the experimental data .
this problem was solved by introducing the nonlinear vector self - coupling of @xmath0-meson in the rhb theory @xcite .
having our working basis established , we explore the shell effects about @xmath1zn ( @xmath4 ) .
@xmath1zn is a waiting point nucleus and here the r - process path comes closest to the @xmath25-stability line .
we show in fig . 1 the results on @xmath26 values for the zn isotopes .
the kink at @xmath4 ( fig 1.a ) shows that nl - sh ( scalar self - coupling only ) exhibits shell effects which are much stronger than the experimental data . in comparison ,
the shell gap with nl - sv2 ( both the scalar and vector self - couplings ) @xcite is reduced as compared to nl - sh .
the shell gap is , however , still larger than the experimental one . in fig .
1(b ) we show the @xmath26 values obtained with the force nl - sv1 .
the slope of the kink shows that nl - sv1 is able to reproduce well the empirical shell effects in the waiting point region .
a comparison with the hfb+skp results shows that the shell effects with skp are strongly quenched .
the shell effects were shown to be quench with skp already at the stability line @xcite .
this behaviour is evidently due to the high effective mass @xmath27 . with the formalism established in @xcite and tested in fig . 1
, we extend it to explore the inaccessible region of the neutron drip - line about @xmath2 . in order to visualize the evolution of shell effects ,
we have chosen the isotopic chains of kr , sr , zr and mo ( @xmath28 ) .
the results with rhb using various forces are shown in fig . 2 .
for a given force , the shell gap at @xmath2 shows a steady decrease in moving from mo ( a ) to kr ( d ) .
nuclei become increasingly unbound and a coupling to the continuum arises in going to larger neutron to proton ratios .
the results with the non - linear scalar coupling ( nl - sh ) show a shell gap at @xmath2 , which is largest amongst all the forces .
similarly strong shell effects with nl - sh were also shown for @xmath2 nuclei near the drip line in ref .
@xcite within the bcs pairing . with the force nl - sv2 with the vector self - coupling of @xmath0-meson ,
the shell effects are milder as compared to nl - sh for all the chains . the results ( fig .
2 ) with our benchmark force nl - sv1 show that the shell gap at @xmath2 is reduced as compared to nl - sv2 .
this is again similar to that observed for the zn isotopes .
however , the shell effects with nl - sv1 are still stronger as compared to the hfb+skp results as shown in the figure .
this is especially true for mo and zr isotopes at n=82 , where the r - process path is assumed to pass through .
the quenching shown by skp in this region is as expected .
this is consistent with a strong quenching exhibited by hfb+skp at the stability line @xcite and also near the waiting - point nucleus @xmath1zn as shown in fig .
1(b ) . in comparison ,
the rhb approach with nl - sv1 shows stronger shell effects about the stability line @xcite as well as in the waiting - point region at @xmath4 , which is consistent with the experimental data .
the shell effects with nl - sv1 become successively weaker as one moves to nuclei with higher isospin such as @xmath29sr ( fig .
2(c ) ) and @xmath30kr ( fig . 2(d ) ) .
it is worth making a special mention of the kr nucleus
. all the forces ( except nl - sh ) show a complete washing out of the shell effects .
this stems from the fact that for @xmath30kr the fermi energy is very close to the continuum .
the shell gap ceases to exist and consequently binding energy of an extra neutron is nearly zero .
this implies that the shell effects for @xmath30kr ( @xmath2 ) are washed out .
such nuclei at the drip line ( @xmath31 ) are of little interest to the r - process as these nuclei can not bind an additional neutron . however , as the r - process path passes through @xmath32 mev , it is seen ( figs .
2.a and 2.b ) that nuclei which would contribute to the r - process show a persistence of stronger shell gaps in contrast to that seen for kr and sr .
figures 2(a ) and 2(b ) show that with nl - sv1 the shell effects for mo ( z=42 ) and zr ( z=40 ) nuclei at @xmath2 are much stronger than with skp . for r - process nuclei with @xmath33
, the shell gaps are expected to be even larger .
we have reproduced the shell effects about the waiting - point nucleus @xmath1zn with the vector self - coupling of @xmath0-meson in the rhb theory . with this basis
, it is shown that the shell effects near the r - process path about @xmath2 remain strong vis - a - vis a quenching exhibited by hfb+skp .
the quenching shown by skp is not consistent with the available data .
it is noteworthy that on the basis of the results with skp , a quenching has been requested for an improved fit to the global r - process abundances @xcite . since skp is not able to reproduce the shell effects at the stability line and in the waiting - point region , an improved fit alone
does not necessarily imply a shell quenching near the r - process path .
thus , alternative mechanisms for nucleosynthesis need to be looked into .
et al . _ ,
j. * 403 * , 216 ( 1993 ) .
sharma et al.,phys .
rev . lett.*72 * , 1431 ( 1994 ) .
j. dobaczewski _
et al . _ , phys .
rev . lett . * 72 * , 981 ( 1994 ) .
sharma , a.r .
farhan and s. mythili , phys .
c * 61 * 054306 ( 2000 ) .
b.d . serot and j.d .
walecka , adv .
* 16 * , 1 ( 1986 ) .
bodmer , nucl .
a * 526 * , 703 ( 1991 ) .
sharma , m.a .
nagarajan and p. ring , phys .
b * 312 * , 377 ( 1993 ) .
sharma , in preparation ( 2000 ) .
|
@xmath2 nuclei r - process path nuclear abundances @xmath3 nuclei neutron - rich not accessible conflicting points shell effects near neutron drip line shell effects isospin number @xmath2 near neutron drip line data waiting - point nucleus @xmath1zn shell effects near r - process path relativistic hartree - bogoliubov theory vector self - coupling @xmath0 meson shell effects stability line described rmf lagrangian describes nucleons as dirac spinors moving in meson fields @xcite @xmath5 @xmath6 bare nucleon mass dirac spinor scalar meson @xmath8 isoscalar vector mesons isovector vector mesons photons @xmath10 masses @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 coupling constants @xmath14 nonlinear scalar potential @xmath17 for @xmath8-mesons for description finite nuclei added non - linear vector self - coupling of @xmath0-meson represented by @xmath18 nuclei near drip line coupling to continuum required self - consistent treatment pairing necessaryemploy framework rhb theory features relativistic dirac - hartree - bogoliubov equations obtained @xmath19 @xmath20 quasiparticle energies coefficients four - dimensional dirac spinors pairing potential @xmath23 given by @xmath24 calculations expanding fermionic bosonic wavefunctions in 20 oscillator shells spherical configuration used force nl - sh @xcite non - linear scalar self - coupling forces nl - sv1 nl - sv2 scalar vector self - couplings forces developed soften high - density equation nuclear matter improve ground - state properties nuclei existing nuclear forces nonlinear scalar self - coupling @xmath8-meson exhibit shell effects stronger experimental data solved nonlinear vector self - coupling @xmath0-meson rhb theory explore shell effects @xmath1zn waiting point nucleus r - process path closest to @xmath25-stability line fig 1 results @xmath26 values zn isotopes nl - sh scalar self - coupling exhibits shell effects stronger experimental datashell gap with nl - sv2 @xcite reduced compared to nl - sh gap larger than experimental fig . 1(b @xmath26 values with nl - sv1 nl - sv1 shell effects in waiting point region comparison with hfb+skp results shell effects with skp quenched skp at stability line @xcite due to high effective mass @xmath27 formalism in @xcite inaccessible region neutron drip - line about @xmath2 evolution shell effects chosen isotopic chains of kr sr zr mo ( @xmath28 ) results with rhb in fig . 2 shell gap at @xmath2 decrease from mo to kr nuclei unbound coupling to continuum larger neutron to proton ratios results with non - linear scalar coupling nl - sh show shell gap at @xmath2 largest amongst strong shell effects with nl - sh for @xmath2 nuclei near drip line with force nl - sv2 with vector self - coupling @xmath0-meson shell effects milder to nl - sh for all chains resultsbenchmark force nl - sv1 shell gap at @xmath2 reduced compared nl - sv2 similar zn isotopes shell effects nl - sv1 stronger hfb+skp results especially true for mo and zr isotopes at n=82 r - process path quenching skp expected consistent with strong quenching hfb+skp at stability line @xcite waiting - point nucleus @xmath1zn fig 1(b rhb approach with nl - sv1 stronger shell effects stability line @xcite waiting - point region at @xmath4 consistent with experimental data shell effects nl - sv1 weaker nuclei higher isospin @xmath29sr @xmath30kr mention kr nucleus forces except nl - sh washing out of shell effects @xmath30kr fermi energy close to continuum shell gap binding energy extra neutron nearly zero shell effects for @xmath30kr washed out nuclei at drip line ( @xmath31 ) little interest to r - process can not bind additional neutron r - process path passes through @xmath32 mev2.a 2.b nuclei r - process show stronger shell gaps kr sr figures 2(a 2(b ) show nl - sv1 shell effects mo z=42 zr z=40 ) nuclei at @xmath2 stronger skp r - process nuclei @xmath33 shell gaps larger reproduced shell effects waiting - point nucleus @xmath1zn vector self - coupling @xmath0-meson rhb theory shell effects near r - process path @xmath2 remain strong quenching hfb+skp quenching skp not consistent with data quenching requested for improved fit global r - process abundances @xcite skp reproduce shell effects stability line waiting - point region improved fit imply shell quenching r - process path alternative mechanisms nucleosynthesis need et al . 403 *, 216 ( 1993 ) sharma,phys . rev*72 1431 ( 1994 ) dobaczewski phys 72 981 1994 sharma farhan mythili phys 61 054306 ( 2000 ) serot walecka 16 * 1 ( 1986 ) bodmer nucl526 703 1991 ) sharma nagarajan p ring phys 312 377 1993 ) sharma preparation 2000 )
| 0.350447
| 2,195
| 1,116
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,395
|
in this paper , we present the two - step trigonometrically fitted symmetric obrechkoff methods with algebraic order of twelve .
the method is based on the symmetric two - step obrechkoff method , with 12 algebraic order , high phase - lag order and is constructed to solve ivps with periodic solutions such as orbital problems .
we compare the new method to some recently constructed optimized methods from the literature .
the numerical results obtained by the new method for some problems show its superiority in efficiency , accuracy and stability .
|
in this paper , the symmetric obrechkoff methods for solving special class of initial value problems associated with second order ordinary differential equations of the type @xmath0 in which the first order derivatives do not occur explicitly , are discussed.the numerical integration methods for ( [ dif ] ) can be divided into two distinct classes : 1 .
problems for which the solution period is known ( even approximately ) in advance .
problems for which the period is not known . for several decades ,
there has been strong interest in searching for better numerical methods to integrate first - order and second - order initial value problems , because these problems are usually encountered in celestial mechanics , quantum mechanical scattering theory , theoretical physics and chemistry , and electronics . generally , the solution of @xmath1 is periodic , so it is expected that the result produced by some numerical methods preserves the analogical periodicity of the analytic solution [ 9 - 22 ] .
computational methods involving a parameter proposed by gautschi @xcite , jain et al .
@xcite , sommeijer and et al @xcite and steifel and bettis @xcite yield numerical solution of problems of class ( 1 ) .
chawla and et al @xcite , ananthakrishnaiah @xcite , shokri and et al .
@xcite , dahlquist @xcite , franco @xcite , lambert and watson [ 9 ] , tsitouras and simos @xcite , simos and et al .
@xcite , hairer @xcite , wang et al .
@xcite , saldanha and achar @xcite , and daele and vanden berghe @xcite have developed methods to solve problems of class ( 2 ) .
consider obrechkoff method of the form @xmath2 for the numerical integration of the problem ( [ dif ] ) .
the method ( [ ob ] ) is symmetric when @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 , and it is of order @xmath6 if the truncation error associated with the linear difference operator is given as @xmath7 where @xmath8 is a constant dependent on @xmath9 .
when the method ( [ ob ] ) is applied to the test problem , we get the characteristic equation as @xmath10 where @xmath11 and @xmath12 the method ( [ ob ] ) is said to have interval of periodicity @xmath13 if for all @xmath14 the roots of eq .
( [ ro ] ) are complex and at least two of them lie on the unit circle and the others lie inside the unit circle . the method ( [ ob ] ) is said to be p - stable if its interval of periodicity is @xmath15 . for any symmetric multistep methods , the phase - lag ( frequency distortion ) of order @xmath16
is given by @xmath17 where @xmath18 is the phase lag constant and @xmath16 is the phase - lag order .
the characteristic equation of the method ( [ ob ] ) is given by @xmath19 where @xmath20 @xmath21 contains polynomial functions together with trigonometric polynomials @xmath22 the resulting methods are then based on a hybrid set of polynomials and trigonometric functions . if @xmath23 is limited to @xmath24 , we called method with zero phase - lag .
we present here the trigonometric versions of the set . in
case @xmath25 is purely imaginary one obtains the hyperbolic description of this set .
this set is characterized by two integer parameters @xmath26 and @xmath23 .
the set in which there is no polynomial part is identified by @xmath27 while the set in which there is no trigonometric polynomial component is identified by @xmath27 . for each problem
one has @xmath28 , where @xmath29 is the maximum exponent present in the full polynomial basis for the same problem .
from the form and without loss of generality we assume @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 and we can write @xmath33,\ ] ] when @xmath34 we get @xmath35\nonumber\\ & + & h^4\left[\beta_{20}(y_{n+1}^{(4)}+y_{n-1}^{(4)})+\beta _ { 21}y_n^{(4)}\right]\nonumber\\ & + & h^6\left[\beta_{30}(y_{n+1}^{(6)}+y_{n-1}^{(6)})+\beta _
{ 31}y_n^{(6)}\right].\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath36 for method ( [ ob3 ] ) is 11 so that if @xmath37 , @xmath38 we obtain classic method and the coefficients of this method are @xmath39 where its phase - lag is given by @xmath40 and its local truncation error is given by @xmath41 if @xmath42 , @xmath43 we obtain the method with zero phase - lag ( pl ) , and the coefficients of this case are given in @xcite .
if @xmath44 , @xmath45 , so we called pl@xmath46 , we have @xmath47 @xmath48 where @xmath49 and @xmath50 for small values of @xmath51 the above formulae are subject to heavy cancelations .
in this case the following taylor series expansion must be used : @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 the phase - lag and the local truncation error for the pl@xmath46 method are given by @xmath58 hence @xmath59 and @xmath60 where @xmath61 , @xmath25 is the frequency and @xmath9 is the step length . as @xmath62 , the lte of the method with derived coefficients tends to @xmath63 . which agrees with the lte of the three methods due to wang @xcite , simos @xcite and daele @xcite , achar @xcite , as @xmath64 .
the behavior of the coefficients of the pl@xmath46 method are shown in figures 2.1 , to 2.6 .
if @xmath65 , @xmath66 , so we called pl@xmath67 , we have @xmath68 @xmath69 where @xmath70 and @xmath71 for small values of @xmath51 the above formulae are subject to heavy cancelations . in this case the following taylor series expansion must be used : + @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 the phase - lag and the local truncation error for the pl@xmath67 method are given by @xmath78 and @xmath79 where @xmath61 , @xmath25 is the frequency and @xmath9 is the step length .
the behavior of the coefficients of the pl@xmath67 method are shown in figures 4 , 5 , 6 .
the characteristic equation @xmath80 has complex roots of unit magnitude when @xmath81 , i.e. when @xmath82 . substituting for @xmath83 and @xmath84 for these the two - step methods , the interval of periodicity of the classical obrechkoff method , pl@xmath46 and pl@xmath67 methods when @xmath62 are obtained [ 0 , 25.2004 ] , [ 0,408.04 ] and [ 0,1428.84 ] respectively
in this section , we present some numerical results obtained by our new two - step trigonometrically - fitted obrechkoff methods and compare them with those from other multistep methods as + achar : the 12th order obrechkoff method of achar @xcite . + daele : the 12th order obrechkoff method of van daele @xcite .
+ neta : the p - stable 8th - order super - implicit method of neta @xcite .
+ simos : the 12th order obrechkoff method of simos @xcite .
+ wang : the 12th order obrechkoff method of wang @xcite .
+ we consider the nonlinear _ undamped duffing equation _
@xmath85 where @xmath86 , @xmath87 and @xmath88 $ ] .
we use the following exact solution for from @xcite , @xmath89 where @xmath90 in order to integrate this equation by a obrechkoff method , one needs the values of @xmath91 , which occur in calculating @xmath92 .
these higher order derivatives can all be expressed in terms of @xmath93 and @xmath94 through , i.e. @xmath95 the absolute errors at @xmath96 , for the new method , in comparison with methods of simos , daele , achar , wang and the new method are given in table 3.1 and the cpu times are listed in table 3.2 .
also the absolute errors at @xmath97 , with @xmath98 , for the new method pl@xmath67 , in comparison with methods neta and the new method are given in table 3.3 .
@xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 consider the initial value problem @xmath102 with the exact solution @xmath103 .
this equation has been solved numerically for @xmath104 using exact starting values . in the numerical experiment
, we take the step lengths @xmath105 , @xmath106 , @xmath107 , @xmath108 , @xmath109 and @xmath110 . in table 3.4 , we present the absolute errors at the end - point and the cpu times are listed in table 3.5 .
@xmath111 @xmath112 consider the initial value problem @xmath113,\ ] ] with the exact solution the theoretical solution of this problem is @xmath114 the absolute errors at @xmath115 for the new method , in comparison with methods of wang , simos , daele and achar are given in the table 3.6 .
the relative cpu times of computation of the new method in comparison with the other four referred methods are given in table 3.7 .
@xmath116 @xmath117
in this paper , we have presented the new trigonometrically - fitted two - step symmetric obrechkoff methods of order 12 .
the details of the procedure adapted for the applications have been given in section 2 .
with trigonometric fitting , we have improved the local truncation error , phase - lag error , interval of periodicity and cpu time for the classes of two - step obrechkoff methods .
the numerical results obtained by the new method for some problems show its superiority in efficiency , accuracy and stability .
the authors wish to thank the professor theodore e. simos and the anonymous referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and their fruitful comments and suggestions .
chawla , m. m. , rao , p. s. , a numerov - type method with minimal phase - lag for the integration of second order periodic initial value problems .
ii : explicit method , j. comput . appl .
( 1986 ) , 329 - 337 .
neta , b. , and fukushima , t. , obrechkoff versus super - implicit methods for the integration of keplerian orbits , proc .
aiaa / aas astrodynamics specialist conference , denver , co , august 14 - 17 , 2000 , paper number aiaa 2000 - 4029 .
neta , b. , and fukushima , t. , obrechkoff versus super - implicit methods for the solution of first and second order initial value problems , j. comput .
applic . , special issue on numerical methods in physics , chemistry and engineering , t. e. simos and g. abdelas ( guest editors ) , 45 , ( 2003 ) , 383 - 390 .
psihoyios , g. , simos , t. e. , effective numerical approximation of schrodinger type equations through multiderivative exponentially - fitted schemes , appl .
comput . math . 1 ( 1 ) ( 2004 ) , 205 - 215 .
sakas , d. p. , simos , t. e. , multiderivative methods of eighth algebraic order with minimal phase - lag for the numerical solution of the radial schrodinger equation , j. comput appl .
( 2005 ) , 161 - 172 .
saldanha , g. , achar , s. d. , symmetric multistep obrechkoff methods with zero phase - lag for periodic initial value problems of second order differential equations , appl .
comput . 218
( 2011 ) , 2237 - 2248 .
shokri , a. , rahimi ardabili , m. y. , shahmorad , s. , and hojjati , g. , a new two - step p - stable hybrid obrechkoff method for the numerical integration of second - order ivps .
, j. comput .
math . , 235 ( 2011 ) , 1706 - 1712 .
wang , z. , zhao , d. , dai , y. and song , x. , a new high efficient and high accurate obrechkoff four - step method for the periodic non - linear undamped duffings equation , comput . phys .
commun . 165
( 2005 ) , 110 - 126 .
|
paper symmetric obrechkoff methods solving initial value problems second order ordinary differential equations type @xmath0 first order derivatives occur discussed numerical integration methods for ( [ dif ] ) divided into two classes 1 problems solution period known. problems period not known decades strong interest searching better numerical methods integrate first second - order initial value problems problems encountered in celestial mechanics quantum mechanical scattering theory theoretical physics chemistry electronics solution of @xmath1 periodic expected result preserves analogical periodicity analytic solution computational methods parameter proposed by gautschi jain sommeijer steifel bettis yield numerical solution problems class ( 1 ) chawla ananthakrishnaiah shokri dahlquist franco lambert watson tsitouras simos hairer wang saldanha achar daele vanden berghe developed methods solve problems class ( 2 ) consider obrechkoff method form @xmath2 for numerical integration problem ( [ dif ] )method ( [ ob ] ) symmetric when @xmath3 order @xmath6 truncation error linear difference @xmath7 @xmath8 constant dependent on @xmath9 method ob applied test problem characteristic equation @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 method interval periodicity @xmath13 @xmath14 roots of eq complex two on unit circle others inside method p - stable if interval periodicity @xmath15 symmetric multistep methods phase - lag distortion ) order @xmath16 by @xmath17 @xmath18 phase lag constant @xmath16 phase - lag order characteristic equation method ob by @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 contains polynomial functions trigonometric polynomials @xmath22 methods based on hybrid set polynomials trigonometric functions @xmath23 limited to @xmath24 method with zero phase - lag trigonometric versions of set @xmath25 imaginary hyperbolic description of set characterized by integer parameters @xmath26 @xmath23 no polynomial part identified by @xmath27 no polynomial by @xmath27 each problem @xmath28 @xmath29 maximum exponent full polynomial basis problemassume @xmath30 write @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35\nonumber\\^4\left\beta{20}(y_{n+1}{(4)}+y{n-1})+\beta 21}y_n^{(4)}\left\beta_{30}(y{n+1}{(6)}+y{n-1}{(6)})+\beta 31}y_n^{(6)}\right @xmath36 method 11 @xmath37 @xmath38 classic method coefficients @xmath39 phase - lag @xmath40 local truncation error @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 method zero phase - lag coefficients @xcite @xmath44 @xmath45 pl@xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 small values @xmath51 formulae subject heavy cancelations taylor series expansion @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 phase - lag local truncation error pl@xmath46 method @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath25 frequency @xmath9 step length @xmath62 method derived coefficients @xmath63agrees with three methods wang simos daele achar @xmath64 behavior coefficients pl@xmath46 method shown figures 2.1 2.6 @xmath65 @xmath66 pl@xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 small values @xmath51 formulae subject to heavy cancelations taylor series expansion used @xmath72 @xmath77 phase - lag local truncation error pl@xmath67 method given by @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath61 @xmath25 frequency @xmath9 step length behavior coefficients pl@xmath67 method shown figures 4 5 6 characteristic equation @xmath80 complex roots unit magnitude when @xmath81 @xmath82 substituting @xmath83 @xmath84 two - step methods interval periodicity classical obrechkoff method pl@xmath46 pl@xmath67 methods @xmath62 obtained [ 0 25.2004 ] [ 0,408.04 ] 0,1428.84 ] present numerical results new two - step obrechkoff methods compare methods achar 12th order method @xcite daele neta 8th method simos 12th order method simos @xcitewang 12th order obrechkoff method wang @xcite consider nonlinear undamped duffing equation @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath88 exact solution @xcite @xmath89 @xmath90 integrate equation obrechkoff method needs values @xmath91 calculating @xmath92 higher order derivatives expressed @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath95 absolute errors @xmath96 new method simos daele achar wang table 3.1 cpu times table 3.2 absolute errors @xmath97 @xmath98 new method@xmath67 method table 3.3 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 initial value problem @xmath102 exact solution @xmath103 equation solved numerically @xmath104 exact starting values numerical experiment step lengths @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath109 @xmath110 table 3.4 absolute errors end - point cpu times table 3.5 @xmath111 @xmath112 initial value problem @xmath113 exact solution theoretical solution @xmath114 absolute errors @xmath115 new method wang simos daele achar table 3.6 relative cpu times computation new method other methods table 3.7@xmath116 @xmath117 presented new trigonometrically - fitted two - step symmetric obrechkoff methods order 12 details procedure section 2 improved local truncation error phase - lag error interval periodicity cpu time two - step obrechkoff methods numerical results show superiority efficiency accuracy stability authors thank professor theodore simos anonymous referees reading comments suggestions chawla rao numerov - type method minimal phase - lag second order periodic initial value problems explicit method comput appl 1986 ) 329 - 337 neta fukushima obrechkoff versus super - implicit methods integration keplerian orbits aiaa astrodynamics specialist conference denver august 14 - 17 2000 paper 2000 - 4029 obrechkoff super - implicit methods first second order initial value problems special issue numerical methods physics chemistry engineering simos abdelas guest editors 45 2003 ) 383 - 390 psihoyios simos effective numerical approximation schrodinger type equations multiderivative exponentially - fitted schemes math 1 2004 ) 205 - 215sakas simos multiderivative methods eighth algebraic minimal phase - lag solution radial schrodinger equation 2005 ) 161 - 172 saldanha achar multistep obrechkoff methods zero phase - lag initial value problems second order differential equations 218 2011 ) 2237 - 2248 shokri rahimi ardabili shahmorad hojjati two - step hybrid obrechkoff method numerical integration second - order ivps 235 2011 ) 1706 - 1712 wang zhao dai song high efficient accurate obrechkoff four - step method periodic non - linear undamped duffings equation 165 2005 ) 110 - 126
| 0.438101
| 2,984
| 1,620
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,414
|
with the goal of measuring localization in disordered interacting systems , we examine the finite - size scaling of the geometrically - averaged density of states calculated from the local green s function with finite energy resolution .
our results show that , unlike in a simple energy binning procedure , there is no limit in which the finite energy resolution is irrelevant . , , disorder ; interactions ; localization ;
dmft 71.30.+h,71.23.-k , 71.23.an , 71.27.+a significant disorder , for example due to non - stoichiometric doping , is a feature of many materials , and may in fact play a key role in many interesting behaviors , especially when combined with electronic correlations .
the study of systems with both disorder and interactions has a long history,@xcite but it has been difficult to access the regime in which both are strong , where the physics of both anderson localization and the mott gap are significant .
the technique of dynamical mean field theory@xcite ( dmft ) has been very successful in the study of systems with strong interactions , and there has recently been interest in applying it to disordered systems.@xcite dmft calculates the local green s function , @xmath0
. how can information on localization be drawn from this ?
the geometrically - averaged density of states ( gados ) appears to be ideally suited to the task .
this is the geometric average over sites of the local density of states ( ldos ) which is obtained directly from the local green s function : @xmath1^{1/n } , \\
\rho ( { \bf r}_i,\omega ) & = & -{1 \over \pi } { \rm i m } g({\bf r}_i,{\bf r}_i , \omega+i\gamma)\end{aligned}\ ] ] which is exact in the limit @xmath2 . in an infinite system , @xmath3 at the fermi level is an order parameter for the anderson transition , being nonzero when states at the fermi level are extended and zero when they become localized .
this is because when wavefunctions at a given energy become localized in real space , the ldos at that energy becomes discrete : localized wavefunctions at the same energy are well separated in position so the ldos at that energy goes to zero far from the wavefunction centers . to consider specific disorder configurations , it is necessary to work with finite size systems , and in this case finite - size scaling analysis of the gados
must be performed .
this procedure is well studied in non - interacting systems for which single - particle wavefunctions can be calculated , providing perfect energy resolution . in a numerical calculation on an interacting system , however , the green s function is obtained for finite @xmath4 .
we have explored the impact this has on the scaling of the gados in the context of a noninteracting model @xmath5 with site energies , @xmath6 , distributed with probability @xmath7 .
the width of the potential distribution , @xmath8 , parameterizes the strength of the disorder .
the model is solved exactly by numerical diagonalization using the lapack libraries . in earlier
work,@xcite we calculated the local density of states within a finite energy resolution @xmath4 using a simple binning procedure : @xmath9 each state which falls in the energy window is assigned equal weight . in this case , we demonstrated that the gados scales as a function of an effective length scale : @xmath10 where @xmath11 acts as an effective inelastic mean free path , limiting the relevant system size .
@xmath11 can also be seen as the system size divided by the average number of states in a bin : @xmath12 where in one dimension @xmath13 is the average energy spacing between states and @xmath14 is the density of states .
here we model more accurately the way the green s function introduces finite energy resolution : @xmath15}. \label{lor}\end{aligned}\ ] ] all results shown are at the band center on one - dimensional systems with disorder strength @xmath16 , for which all states are localized . .
all points represent averages over at least 1000 disorder configurations .
@xmath17 is the system size , and @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the density of states .
( a ) square energy bin ( eqn .
( [ box ] ) ) with constant width @xmath4 .
( b ) lorentzian energy bin ( eqn .
( [ lor ] ) ) with constant @xmath4 .
( c ) and ( d ) lorentzian energy bin with @xmath20.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] fig .
1(a ) shows the gados as a function of system size for three non - zero values of @xmath4 using the square binning in eqn .
( [ box ] ) reported earlier.@xcite fig .
1(b ) shows the gados as a function of system size for the same @xmath4 values using the lorentzian binning in eqn .
( [ lor ] ) .
two features are immediately apparent : the lack of exponential decay and the overall inflation of the gados . with the lorentzian bin , _ all _ states contribute to the sum in eqn .
( [ lor ] ) with rapidly decreasing weight away from @xmath21 . despite the small weight assigned to them ,
the many states outside the peak of the lorentzian have a dramatic impact on the gados .
this is because when these states are centered , in real space , at positions with otherwise small ldos they can significantly increase the ldos . even a modest increase in the _ minimum _ values of the ldos causes a dramatic increase in the gados .
a second important distinction between the two binning schemes arises in the limit @xmath22 . in this limit , for each @xmath21 there will be disorder configurations for which ( i ) in the square bin case there are no states in a bin and ( ii ) for the lorentzian bin case no state has significant weight . in the case of the square bin
, we removed these bins from the average . however , there is no systematic way to do this in the lorentzian case .
the inclusion of these states dramatically lowers the configuration averaged ldos and hence the gados even below the @xmath23 value .
it appears to be possible to account for the behavior of @xmath24 with lorentzian binning within the framework of an effective length ; however , a different form of @xmath25 is required . in the square bin case , in the limit of small @xmath4 , @xmath26 , because by construction there is always at least one state in each bin . in the lorentzian bin case ,
the average number of states in a bin may be less than one .
@xmath25 is now simply equal to @xmath27 .
this is consistent with the nearly size independent results when a fixed value of gamma is used .
furthermore , fig .
1(c ) shows the gados as a function of system size using bin widths @xmath28 .
fig .
1(d ) presents the same data plotted versus @xmath29 showing scaling .
the key point is that there is no limit in which the finite energy resolution is irrelevant . in conclusion
, there appears to be no finite - size scaling of the gados calculated from the local green s function with fixed energy resolution , and the scaling which occurs when @xmath30 arises at least in part from physics unrelated to localization .
we suggest that other measures of localization , such as the inverse participation ratio , which do not share the extreme sensitivity to small values of the ldos may be more effective than the gados in interacting systems , although changes to the scaling due to finite energy resolution will still need to be addressed .
|
this work is supported by nserc and trent university .
d. belitz and t. r. kirkpatrick , rev .
mod . phys .
* 66 * ( 1994 ) 261 .
a. georges and g. kotliar , rev .
* 68 * ( 1996 ) 13 .
v. dobrosavljevic , a. a. pastor and b. k. nikolic , europhys .
* 62 * ( 2003 ) 76 .
k. byczuk , w. hofstetter and d. vollhardt , phys .
* 94 * ( 2005 ) 056404 .
yun song , r. wortis and w. a. atkinson , cond - mat/0609590 .
|
work supported nserc trent university. belitz kirkpatrick rev phys . 66 1994 ) 261 .. georges kotliar rev 68 1996 ) 13 . dobrosavljevic pastor nikolic europhys 62 2003 ) 76 . byczuk hofstetter vollhardt 94 2005 ) 056404 yun song. atkinson cond - mat/0609590
| 0.068999
| 189
| 91
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,424
|
the planar interface of an ordinary , isotropic , homogeneous , dielectric material and a hyperbolic , dielectric , structurally chiral material can support the propagation of one or multiple dyakonov
tamm waves , at a specified frequency and along a specified direction in the interface plane . when multiple dyakonov
tamm waves can exist , they differ in phase speed , propagation length , degree of localization to the interface , and spatial profiles of the associated electromagnetic fields .
dependence on the relative permittivity scalar of the isotropic partnering material suggests exploitation for optical sensing of analytes .
* dyakonov tamm waves guided jointly by an ordinary , isotropic , homogeneous , dielectric material and a hyperbolic , dielectric , structurally chiral material * + akhlesh lakhtakia and muhammad faryad + pennsylvania state university , department of engineering science and mechanics , nanoengineered metamaterials group ( nanomm ) , university park , pa 168026812 , usa +
|
the dyakonov wave is an electromagnetic surface wave guided by the planar interface of two homogenous dielectric materials , at least one of which is anisotropic .
the existence of the dyakonov wave was predicted in the 1980s @xcite and experimentally verified about five years ago @xcite .
the tamm wave is guided by the planar interface of two isotropic dielectric materials , at least one of which is periodically nonhomogeneous in the direction normal to the interface . predicted in 1977 @xcite , tamm waves
were experimentally observed shortly thereafter @xcite and are being applied for optical sensing of analytes @xcite . whereas the anisotropy of a partnering material provides the dyakonov wave a sensitivity to the direction of propagation @xcite ,
the periodic nonhomogeneity of a partnering material is responsible for multiple tamm waves to propagate in any direction @xcite .
both of these attributes are combined in dyakonov
tamm waves , whose propagation is guided by the interface of two dielectric materials , one of which must be anisotropic and periodically nonhomogeneous normal to the interface @xcite .
recently , the existence of these dyakonov
tamm waves was confirmed experimentally using a prism - coupled configuration @xcite . in the foregoing papers on dyakonov tamm waves ,
one partnering material is an ordinary , isotropic , homogeneous , dielectric material with a purely real relative permittivity @xmath0 , whereas the real part of the relative permittivity dyadic @xmath1 of the anisotropic , periodically nonhomogeneous , dielectric partnernering material is positive definite , i.e. , all three eigenvalues of @xmath1 have positive real parts @xcite . what would happen if @xmath2 were indefinite , i.e. , if either one or two of its eigenvalues had negative real parts , the remaining having positive real parts ?
such materials are nowadays called hyperbolic materials .
homogeneous hyperbolic materials exist in nature @xcite and have also been manufactured @xcite .
periodically nonhomogeneous hyperbolic materials appear very likely to be manufacturable @xcite using physical - vapor - deposition techniques @xcite . in this letter , we present the results of our investigations on dyakonov
tamm waves guided by the planar interface of an ordinary , isotropic , homogenous , dielectric material and a hyperbolic , dielectric , structurally chiral material which is nonhomogeneous in the direction normal to the interface .
section [ theory ] briefly describes the relevant one - point boundary - value problem .
numerical results are provided and discussed in sec .
[ nrd ] . an @xmath3 dependence on time
@xmath4 is implicit , with @xmath5 and @xmath6 denoting the angular frequency .
the one - point boundary - value problem of dyakonov tamm - wave propagation is as follows : suppose that the plane @xmath7 is the interface between the two chosen partnering materials .
the half space @xmath8 is occupied by an ordinary , isotropic , homogenous , dielectric material with relative permittivity @xmath9 such that @xmath10 and @xmath11 .
the half space @xmath12 is occupied by a hyperbolic , dielectric , structurally chiral material with relative permittivity dyadic @xcite @xmath13 where the direction of nonhomogeneity is parallel to the @xmath14 axis ; the cartesian unit vectors are identified as @xmath15 , @xmath16 , and @xmath17 ; and @xmath18 is the permittivity of free space ; the periodic nonhomogeneity is expressed through the rotation dyadic @xmath19 with @xmath20 as the period and either @xmath21 for structural right - handedness or @xmath22 for structural left - handedness ; the dyadic @xmath23 contains the tilt angle @xmath24 $ ] with respect to the @xmath25 plane ; @xmath26 , @xmath27 , and @xmath28 are the three @xmath14-independent eigenvalues of @xmath29 ; and either one or two of these three eigenvalues have negative real parts but the remainder do not . the electromagnetic field phasors everywhere can be written as @xcite @xmath30 \#h(\#r)=\#h(z ) \exp\les{i}q(x\cos\psi+y\sin\psi)\ris \end{array}\ric\,,\ ] ] with the unknown surface wavenumber @xmath31 and unknown functions @xmath32 and @xmath33 .
the angle @xmath34 denotes the direction of propagation in the @xmath25 plane .
as the procedure to obtain and solve a dispersion equation for @xmath31 , and then determine @xmath32 and @xmath33 , for a specific @xmath35 has been described elsewhere in detail @xcite , it is not repeated here .
for illustrative results , we set @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath21 , @xmath40 nm , @xmath41 , and @xmath42 . without loss of generality , we took the isotropic partner to be free space ( i.e. , @xmath43 ) flp .
our search was mostly restricted to the regime @xmath44 $ ] , where @xmath45 is the free - space wavenumber . at every free - space wavelength @xmath46 $ ] nm
, we found three solutions @xmath31 of the dispersion equation .
the solutions were organized in three branches , as shown in fig .
thus , three distinct dyakonov
tamm waves differing in phase speed @xmath47 and propagation length @xmath48 can propagate along the @xmath49 axis in the interface plane for @xmath46 $ ] nm .
tamm waves on the highest-@xmath50 branch have @xmath51 , where @xmath52 is the speed of light in free space , and @xmath53 ranging from @xmath54 nm to @xmath55 nm .
tamm waves on the lowest-@xmath50 branch have @xmath50 ranging from @xmath56 to @xmath57 , and @xmath58 @xmath59 m .
clearly from the presented data , a lower phase speed is associated with higher attenuation along the direction of propagation .
the dyakonov
tamm waves on the three branches in fig .
[ fig1 ] are not only dissimilar in phase speed and propagation length , but the spatial profiles of their field along the @xmath14 axis also differ .
let us focus on the three solutions of the dispersion equation for @xmath60 nm .
figure [ fig2 ] presents plots of the magnitudes of the cartesian components of @xmath32 and @xmath33 as functions of @xmath14 for the dyakonov tamm wave with @xmath61 , fig .
[ fig3 ] for the dyakonov
tamm wave with @xmath62 , and fig .
[ fig4 ] for the dyakonov
tamm wave with @xmath63 . on the isotropic side , the degree of localization of the dyakonov
tamm wave to the interface is greater if @xmath64 is higher .
however , on the anisotropic side of the interface , a clear dependence of localization to the interface does not emerge from the three figures .
indeed , of the three dyakonov tamm waves , the one in fig .
[ fig4 ] is the most strongly localized to the interface , whereas the one in fig .
[ fig3 ] is the most weakly localized to the interface .
the dyakonov tamm - wave - propagation phenomenon depends strongly on @xmath35 .
this is exemplied by the plots in fig .
[ fig5 ] of @xmath50 and @xmath53 as functions of @xmath65 $ ] when @xmath60 nm and @xmath66 .
the solutions can be organized in six branches .
one branch , with the highest values of @xmath50 and @xmath53 spans the entire angular regime @xmath65 $ ] available for propagation .
each of the remaining five branches spans a finite range of @xmath35 .
although the five branches appear to be clustered together , the phase speeds range from @xmath67 to @xmath68 and the propagation lengths from @xmath69 @xmath59 m to @xmath70 @xmath59 m , which are quite wide ranges .
either one or two or three dyakonov
tamm waves can propagate in the interface plane at an angle @xmath35 with respect to the @xmath49 axis .
let us also note that , because of chiral symmetry about the @xmath14 axis , the solutions of the dispersion equation are the same for @xmath35 and @xmath71 .
the dyakonov tamm - wave - propagation phenomenon also depends strongly on @xmath9 .
suppose that free space , the isotropic partnering material for figs .
[ fig2][fig4 ] , were to be replaced by a dielectric material with @xmath72 .
then the dispersion equation has just only two solutions@xmath73 and @xmath74instead of the three solutions for @xmath43 .
the large changes between the solutions for the two values of @xmath9 chosen here strongly suggest the potential of dyakonov
tamm waves supported by a partnering material that is hyperbolic , dielectric , and structurally chiral for optical sensing of analytes in a prism - coupled configuration , just as both surface - plasmon - polariton waves @xcite and tamm waves @xcite are being used by technoscientists .
* acknowledgments . * a.l . is grateful to the charles godfrey binder endowment at the pennsylvania state university for the financial support of his ongoing research .
m.f . was supported by grant no .
dmr-1125591 from the u.s .
national science foundation . and propagation length @xmath53 as functions of @xmath75 , when @xmath43 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath21 , @xmath40 nm , @xmath41 , and @xmath42 .
the solutions of the dispersion equation are organized in three branches .
, width=377 ] of the magnitudes of the cartesian components of @xmath32 and @xmath33 of an spp wave when @xmath60 nm , @xmath43 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath21 , @xmath40 nm , @xmath41 , and @xmath42 .
the @xmath49 , @xmath76 , and @xmath14-components are represented by red solid , blue dashed , and black chain - dashed lines , respectively . for this dyakonov
tamm wave , @xmath61 .
, width=377 ] and propagation length @xmath53 as functions of @xmath35 , when @xmath60 nm , @xmath43 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath21 , @xmath40 nm , and @xmath66 . the solutions of the dispersion equation are organized in six branches.,width=377 ]
|
dyakonov wave is electromagnetic surface wave guided by interface of two homogenous dielectric materials one anisotropic existence predicted 1980s verified five years ago wave guided by interface of two isotropic dielectric materials one periodically nonhomogeneous in direction predicted in 1977 observed applied for optical sensing anisotropy of partnering material provides sensitivity to direction propagation periodic nonhomogeneity of partnering material for multiple tamm waves both attributes combined in dyakonov tamm waves propagation guided by interface of two dielectric materials one must be anisotropic and periodically nonhomogeneous existence waves confirmed experimentally using prism - coupled configuration one partnering material is ordinary isotropic homogeneous dielectric material with real relative permittivity part of relative permittivity of anisotropic periodically nonhomogeneous dielectric partnernering material is positive all three eigenvalues have positive real parts if @xmath2 were indefinite one or two had negative real parts remaining positive real parts ? such materials called hyperbolic materialshomogeneous hyperbolic materials exist manufactured nonhomogeneous materials manufacturable using physical - vapor - deposition techniques present results investigations on dyakonov tamm waves planar interface ordinary isotropic homogenous dielectric hyperbolic dielectric material nonhomogeneous theory describes one - point boundary - value problem numerical results discussed @xmath3 dependence on time @xmath4 implicit @xmath5 @xmath6 angular frequency one - point boundary - value problem dyakonov tamm - wave propagation plane @xmath7 interface between two partnering materials half space @xmath8 occupied by ordinary isotropic homogenous dielectric material relative permittivity @xmath9half space @xmath12 occupied by hyperbolic dielectric structurally chiral material relative permittivity @xmath13 nonhomogeneity parallel to @xmath14 axis cartesian unit vectors as @xmath15 @xmath17 @xmath18 permittivity free space periodic nonhomogeneity through rotation dyadic @xmath19 @xmath20 period @xmath21 right - handedness or @xmath22 left - handedness @xmath23 contains tilt angle @xmath24 @xmath25 plane @xmath26 three @xmath14-independent eigenvalues of @xmath29 one or two have negative real parts remainder electromagnetic field phasors written as @xcite @xmath30 = unknown surface wavenumber @xmath31 unknown functions @xmath32 @xmath33 angle @xmath34 denotes direction propagation in @xmath25 plane procedure to solve dispersion equation for @xmath31 determine @xmath32 @xmath33 specific @xmath35 described not repeated illustrative results set @xmath36 @xmath42took isotropic partner free space @xmath43 ) search restricted to regime @xmath44 $ @xmath45 free - space wavenumber free - space wavelength @xmath46 $ nm found three solutions @xmath31 dispersion equation solutions organized in three branches fig three dyakonov tamm waves differing in phase speed @xmath47 propagation length @xmath48 propagate along @xmath49 axis interface plane @xmath46 $ nm waves highest-@xmath50 branch have @xmath51 @xmath52 speed light free space @xmath53 @xmath54 to @xmath55 nm lowest-@xmath50 branch have @xmath56 to @xmath59 m lower phase speed higher attenuation propagation dyakonov tamm waves three branches dissimilar in phase speed propagation length spatial profiles field along @xmath14 axis differ focus on three solutions dispersion equation for @xmath60 nm figure fig2 plots magnitudes cartesian components @xmath32 @xmath33 functions @xmath14 wave @xmath61 @xmath63isotropic side localization dyakonov tamm wave to interface greater if @xmath64 higher anisotropic side clear dependence localization emerge from three figures three dyakonov tamm waves one in most strongly localized one fig3 most weakly localized dyakonov - wave - propagation depends on @xmath35 plots @xmath50 @xmath53 functions of @xmath65 $ ] @xmath60 solutions organized in six branches one branch highest values @xmath50 @xmath53 spans entire angular regime @xmath65 $ propagation remaining five branches spans finite range of @xmath35 phase speeds range from @xmath67 to @xmath68 propagation lengths from @xmath69 to @xmath70 wide ranges three dyakonov waves propagate interface plane at angle @xmath35 @xmath49 axis chiral symmetry about @xmath14 axis solutions dispersion equation same for @xmath35 and @xmath71 dyakonov tamm - wave - propagation depends on @xmath9 suppose free space isotropic partnering material replaced by dielectric material with @xmath72dispersion equation has two solutions@xmath73 and three @xmath43 large changes between solutions for values @xmath9 suggest potential of dyakonov tamm waves partnering material hyperbolic dielectric structurally chiral for optical sensing of analytes in prism - coupled configuration surface - plasmon - polariton waves @xcite and tamm waves used by technoscientists a grateful to charles godfrey binder endowment pennsylvania state university for financial support research supported by grant dmr-1125591 from u.s . national science foundation propagation length @xmath53 functions of @xmath75 @xmath43 solutions dispersion equation in three branches magnitudes of cartesian components of @xmath32 @xmath33 of spp wave @xmath49 @xmath76 @xmath14-components represented by red solid blue dashed black chain - dashed lines dyakonov tamm wave , @xmath61 width=377 ] propagation length @xmath53 functions of @xmath35 @xmath60 nm @xmath43 @xmath21 nm @xmath66 solutions dispersion equation six branches=377 ]
| 0.427044
| 2,504
| 1,237
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,442
|
the development of prebiotic homochirality on early - earth or another planetary platform may be viewed as a critical phenomenon .
it is shown , in the context of spatio - temporal polymerization reaction networks , that environmental effects be them temperature surges or other external disruptions may destroy any net chirality previously produced . in order to understand the emergence of prebiotic homochirality
it is important to model the coupling of polymerization reaction networks to different planetary environments .
|
according to the prebiotic soup hypothesis @xcite , the early earth had the supply of organic compounds needed to jump - start polymerization reactions that , through gradual complexification , led to the first biochemical networks displaying some of the characteristics attributed to life , such as metabolic activity and replication .
although the road is still obscure @xcite , the situation is not all bleak . in 1953
, stanley miller simulated tentative conditions of early - earth in the laboratory to obtain amino acids from simple chemical compounds .
that same year , frank @xcite proposed that auto - catalytic polymerization could explain the emergence of biomolecular homochirality , a clear signature of terrestrial and , possibly , all life @xcite : terrestrial amino acids belonging to proteins are overwhelmingly left - handed , while sugars are right - handed .
if a bottom - up approach to the early development of life is adopted , the homochirality of life s biochemistry must have emerged dynamically , as reactions among the simplest molecular building blocks occurred with high enough yield .
alternatively , one may assume that , somehow , only monomers of a single chirality were present in the prebiotic soup : they were made that way or brought here during the intense bombardment of earth s infancy , that lasted to about 3.8 gyr ago @xcite .
we would , however , still need to understand how homochirality developed elsewhere in the cosmos and not here , and whether it developed with the same chiral bias in more than one place . here
, we consider the homochirality of life as an emergent process that took place on early - earth and , possibly , other planetary platforms . as a starting point ,
we use the reaction - network model proposed by sandars @xcite , which includes enantiometric cross - inhibition .
as shown in the interesting work of brandenburg and multamki @xcite ( bm ) , sandar s polymerization reaction network can be reduced to an effective spatio - temporal mean - field model , where the order parameter is the chiral asymmetry between left and right - handed polymers . to this , we add the effects of an external environment , showing that they can be crucial in the final determination of the net value of enantiometric excess , if any .
sandars proposed the following polymerization reactions @xcite : @xmath0 ; @xmath1 ; @xmath2 ; and , @xmath3 , where @xmath4 ( @xmath5 ) are the reaction rates for adding monomers of the same ( opposite ) chirality to a given chain . the network is completed by adding the four opposite reactions , that is , by interchanging @xmath6 , and by adding a substrate @xmath7 from which both left and right - handed monomers emerge , @xmath8 and @xmath9 , where @xmath10 determine the enzymatic enhancement of left and right - handed monomers , which is not known .
we follow sandars and choose @xmath11 $ ] , @xmath12 $ ] .
as remarked in bm , it is possible to truncate the system to @xmath13 and still maintain the essential aspects of the dynamics leading to homochiralization .
this allows us to model the reaction network as a mean - field theory exhibiting spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking @xcite .
our approach blends the work of bm with the pioneering work of kondepudi and nelson , where the reaction network was coupled to time - dependent external effects @xcite : chirality evolves spatio - temporally in contact with an environment .
the equations can be simplified by assuming that the rate of change of @xmath14 $ ] and @xmath15 $ ] is much slower than that of @xmath16 $ ] and @xmath17 $ ] .
the same for the substrate @xmath18 $ ] , so that @xmath19/dt = q-(q_l+q_r ) \simeq 0 $ ] , where @xmath20 and @xmath21 are the source terms for monomers generated from the substrate @xmath18 $ ] : @xmath22(pc_l + qc_r)$ ] , and @xmath23(pc_r + qc_l)~$ ] @xcite .
the constants @xmath24 and @xmath25 are given in terms of the fidelity of enzymatic reactions @xmath26 , an adjustable parameter .
as demonstrated by kondepudi and nelson @xcite and many others @xcite , auto - catalytic networks show a tendency to bifurcate toward homochirality for values above critical , @xmath27 .
the specific value of @xmath27 is model - dependent . under the above assumptions , and introducing the dimensionless symmetric and asymmetric variables , @xmath28 and @xmath29 , where @xmath30(2k_s / q)^{1/2}$ ] and @xmath31(2k_s / q)^{1/2}$ ]
, bm have shown that the polymerization equations reduce to @xmath32 where @xmath33 , with dimension of inverse time .
@xmath34 is a fixed point : the system will tend towards this value at time - scales of order @xmath35 . with @xmath34 ,
the equation for the chiral asymmetry has fixed points at @xmath36 , as pointed out in bm .
an enantiometric excess is only possible if @xmath37 .
we model the external environment via a stochastic spatio - temporal langevin equation , rewriting the equations above as @xmath38 where @xmath39 is the diffusion constant and @xmath40 represent white noise with zero mean and a two - point correlation function given by @xmath41 , and @xmath42 measures the strength of the external influence .
for example , in mean - field models of phase transitions , it is common to write @xmath43 , where @xmath44 is boltzmann s constant , @xmath45 is the temperature , and @xmath46 is a viscosity coefficient .
the equations can be made dimensionless by introducing @xmath47 and @xmath48 , which determine the typical spatio - temporal scales in the system .
the noise amplitude scales as @xmath49 , where @xmath50 is the number of spatial dimensions . using as nominal values for the parameters , @xmath51@xmath52s@xmath53 , @xmath54@xmath55s@xmath53 , the diffusivity of water @xmath56m@xmath57s@xmath53 , we obtain , @xmath58s)@xmath59 and @xmath60cm)@xmath61 . as in bm
[ see also @xcite ] , the concentrations are spatially - dependent quantities .
this implicitly assumes that it is possible to define an effective correlation volume within which the value of the chiral asymmetry @xmath62 is fairly homogeneous .
( we take @xmath34 . )
using well - known results from the mean - field theory of phase transitions @xcite , we can easily compute the correlation length . from the equation for @xmath62
, we obtain an effective potential @xmath63 , @xmath64~.\ ] ] for @xmath65 , @xmath63 has a typical double - well shape , with minima at the fixed points @xmath66 .
the correlation length , @xmath40 , is given by @xmath67 , where @xmath68 denotes a minimum of the potential .
for the fixed points , we get , @xmath69 . at @xmath70
the correlation length diverges , as it should for a critical point
. however , the noise parameter @xmath71 also controls the behavior of the system .
indeed , even if @xmath72 , an enantiometric excess may not develop if @xmath71 is above a critical value @xmath73 . in analogy with ferromagnets , where above a critical temperature the net magnetization is zero
, one may say that above @xmath73 the stochastic forcing due to the external environment overwhelms any local excess of @xmath74 over @xmath75 enantiometers within a domain of correlation volume @xmath76 : racemization is achieved at large scales and chiral symmetry is restored throughout space .
salam @xcite suggested that there should be a critical temperature @xmath77 above which any net homochirality is destroyed .
however , he conceded that calculating @xmath77 would be quite challenging using the electroweak theory of particle physics . here , we chose a different route which , we believe , will allow us to explore the qualitative aspects of the problem more effectively : the noise amplitude @xmath71 may represent a sudden increase in temperature and/or pressure due to a meteoritic impact or volcanic eruption , or , possibly , due to a source of circularly - polarized ultraviolet light @xcite .
the equation dictating the evolution of the enantiometric excess @xmath62 , eq .
[ aeq ] , was solved with a finite - difference method in a @xmath78 grid and a @xmath79 grid with @xmath80 and @xmath81 , and periodic boundary conditions . in 2d , this corresponds to simulating a shallow pool with linear dimensions of @xmath82 cm .
we prepared the system initially in a chirally pure phase , which we chose to be @xmath83 .
the equation is then solved for different values of the external noise , @xmath71 . as can be seen in figure [ tcritfig ] , for @xmath84 , @xmath85 ,
that is , the system becomes racemized .
@xmath86 approaches a constant for large times , indicating that the reaction network reaches equilibrium with the environment .
the results are ensemble averaged . for @xmath87 , @xmath88 .
we can describe the environmental impact on homochirality at the microscopic level by introducing the `` ginzburg criterion '' familiar of phase transitions @xcite .
consider a correlation volume with @xmath89 ( or @xmath90 ) .
what is the energy barrier ( @xmath91 ) to flip half the molecules in the volume so that @xmath85 ? if @xmath92 is the number of molecules in a correlation volume , @xmath93 , where @xmath94 is the energy to flip one molecule .
the ginzburg criterion says that this energy is @xmath95 , where @xmath96 .
comparing the two expressions we obtain , @xmath97 . from equation
[ v ] , @xmath98 .
now , @xmath99 .
( we set @xmath72 . )
using for the microscopic spatial scale @xmath100 , and that @xmath101 , we obtain @xmath102m@xmath103 . [ the energy has dimensions of ( length)@xmath104 . ] to complete the argument , we use that the critical `` environmental '' energy to restore the chiral symmetry was obtained numerically to be ( cf .
figure [ tcritfig ] ) , @xmath105m@xmath103 .
we thus obtain the ratio , @xmath106 .
it is tempting to compare this result with possible sources of homochirality .
for example , weak neutral currents are expected to induce an excess at room temperature of @xmath107 @xcite . in the language of the present work
, they would induce a tilt in the potential @xmath63 proportional to @xmath108 .
thus , within the violent environment of prebiotic earth , effects from such sources , even if cumulative , would be negligible : any accumulated excess could be easily wiped out by an external disturbance .
further work along these lines is in progress .
|
prebiotic soup hypothesis early earth had organic compounds polymerization reactions led to first biochemical networks characteristics life metabolic activity replication road obscure situation not bleak 1953 stanley miller simulated conditions early - earth amino acids from chemical compounds frank proposed auto - catalytic polymerization explain emergence biomolecular homochirality signature of terrestrial all life terrestrial amino acids to proteins left - handed sugars right - handed if bottom - up approach to early development life homochirality of s biochemistry must emerged dynamically reactions molecular high yield alternatively assume monomers of single chirality present in prebiotic soup during bombardment earth s infancy 3.8 gyr ago need to understand how homochirality developed elsewhere in cosmos same chiral bias more one place consider homochirality of life as emergent process on early - earth possibly other planetary platforms starting use reaction - network model by sandars includes enantiometric cross - inhibitionshown in brandenburg multamki sandar s polymerization reaction network reduced to spatio - temporal mean - field model order parameter is chiral asymmetry between left right - handed polymers effects external environment crucial in net value enantiometric excess sandars proposed polymerization reactions @xmath0 @xmath3 @xmath4 reaction rates for adding monomers same opposite chirality network completed by adding four opposite reactions interchanging @xmath6 adding substrate @xmath7 left right - handed monomers emerge @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 enzymatic enhancement of left right - handed monomers choose @xmath11 @xmath12 to truncate system to @xmath13 maintain dynamics leading to homochiralization model reaction network as mean - field theory chiral symmetry breaking approach blends work bm with kondepudi nelson reaction network coupled to time - dependent external effects chirality evolves - temporally in contact with environment equations simplified rate of change of @xmath14 @xmath15 slower than @xmath16 @xmath17substrate @xmath18 @xmath19/dt = q-(q_l+q_r ) 0 @xmath20 @xmath21 source terms monomers substrate @xmath22(pc_l + qc_r) @xmath23(pc_r + qc_l) constants @xmath24 @xmath25 fidelity enzymatic reactions @xmath26 adjustable parameter auto - catalytic networks bifurcate homochirality values above critical @xmath27 value model - dependent dimensionless symmetric asymmetric variables @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30(2k_s / q)^{1/2} @xmath31(2k_s / q)^{1/2} polymerization equations reduce to @xmath32 @xmath33 inverse time @xmath34 fixed point system value time - scales @xmath35 chiral asymmetry fixed points @xmath36 enantiometric excess possible @xmath37 model external environment stochastic spatio - temporal langevin equation equations @xmath38 @xmath39 diffusion constant @xmath40 white noise zero mean two - point correlation function @xmath41 @xmath42 strength external influencemean - field models phase transitions common write @xmath43 @xmath44 boltzmann s constant temperature viscosity coefficient equations dimensionless introducing @xmath47 @xmath48 determine typical spatio - temporal scales noise amplitude scales as @xmath49 @xmath50 number spatial dimensions nominal values parameters @xmath51 diffusivity water obtain @xmath58s)@xmath59 @xmath60cm)@xmath61 concentrations spatially - dependent assumes define effective correlation volume value chiral asymmetry @xmath62 homogeneous @xmath34 results mean - field theory phase transitions compute correlation length equation @xmath62 obtain effective potential @xmath63 , @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath63 typical double - well shape minima at fixed points @xmath66 correlation length @xmath40 given by @xmath67 @xmath68 minimum potential for fixed points get , @xmath69 at @xmath70 correlation length diverges critical point noise parameter @xmath71 controls behavior system@xmath72 enantiometric excess develop if @xmath71 above critical value @xmath73 analogy with ferromagnets above critical temperature net magnetization zero above @xmath73 stochastic forcing overwhelms local excess @xmath74 over @xmath75 enantiometers correlation @xmath76 racemization achieved scales chiral symmetry restored suggested critical temperature @xmath77 above net homochirality destroyed calculating @xmath77 challenging electroweak theory particle physics chose different route qualitative aspects noise amplitude @xmath71 may represent sudden increase in temperature pressure due to meteoritic impact volcanic eruption - polarized ultraviolet light equation evolution enantiometric excess @xmath62 solved with finite - difference method in @xmath78 grid @xmath79 grid @xmath80 @xmath81 periodic boundary conditions shallow pool with linear dimensions @xmath82 cm prepared system in chirally pure phase @xmath83 equation solved for different values external noise @xmath71 for @xmath84 @xmath85 system becomes racemized @xmath86 approaches constant large times reaction network reaches equilibrium with environmentresults averaged @xmath87 @xmath88 environmental impact on homochirality microscopic level ginzburg criterion phase transitions correlation volume with @xmath89 or @xmath90 energy barrier @xmath91 ) to flip half molecules volume @xmath85 ? @xmath92 number molecules correlation volume @xmath93 @xmath94 energy to flip one molecule ginzburg criterion energy is @xmath95 @xmath96 comparing expressions obtain @xmath97 equation @xmath98 @xmath99 set @xmath72 microscopic spatial scale @xmath100 @xmath101 obtain @xmath102m@xmath103 energy dimensions length)@xmath104 critical environmental energy to restore chiral symmetry obtained @xmath105m@xmath103 obtain ratio , @xmath106 compare result with sources homochirality weak neutral currents induce excess at room temperature of @xmath107 induce tilt in potential @xmath63 proportional to @xmath108 environment prebiotic earth effects sources negligible accumulated excess wiped out by external disturbance further work in progress
| 0.361696
| 2,492
| 1,302
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,446
|
the critical behaviour of the fully frustrated xy model in presence of weak positional disorder is studied in a square lattice by monte carlo methods . the critical exponent associated to the divergence of the chiral correlation length
is found to be @xmath0 already at very small values of disorder .
furthermore the helicity modulus jump is found larger than the universal value expected in the xy model .
the study of the fully frustrated xy ( ffxy ) model@xcite in a planar lattices has attracted much attention since it provides a simple model for many physical systems .
in particular it is related to josephson - junction arrays and superconducting wire networks in a magnetic field @xcite for which recent experiments show interesting properties@xcite . in these systems
a perpendicular magnetic field @xmath1 penetrates the array inducing a quenched vortex density .
when the field is such that each plaquette of area @xmath2 in the planar lattice traps half a vortex , e.g. the ratio of the magnetic field to the flux unit @xmath3 , the system can be described by the ffxy model . as first noted by villain@xcite the ffxy model posses , besides the continous @xmath4 symmetry , a discrete @xmath5 symmetry which is not present in the unfrutrated xy model .
the existence of two different symmetries leads to the possibility of two critical temperatures that have been investigated by both analytical methods@xcite and monte carlo ( mc ) simulations@xcite .
however , in spite of accurate mc simulations , the scenario is not fully understood .
in fact , there are numerical evidences supporting both the existence of two very close critical temperatures ( @xmath6 ) with critical behavior typical of ising and thouless - kosterlitz - berezinski ( tkb ) transitions respectively@xcite and the existence of a single transition with novel critical behavior@xcite . in the latter case
it has been claimed that the transition associated to the @xmath5 symmetry is characterized by a correlation length critical exponent @xmath7 lower than that expected in the ising case .
recent experiments on nb wire networks@xcite in an external magnetic field have shown that the critical exponent @xmath7 which can be extracted by the scaling of current - voltage ( i - v ) characteristics , is in agreament neither with a ising - like exponent ( @xmath8 ) nor with the value suggested in ref.[@xcite ] ( @xmath9 ) .
on the contrary , the scaling of the experimental data suggests a much larger value . the aim of the present work is to investigate if the effect of weak quenched disorder in the ffxy model is able to change the critical behaviour of the system and to explain the unexpected critical behaviour .
the hamiltonian of the ffxy model is @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the phase in the site @xmath12 and @xmath13 is the line integral of the vector potential along the line ( @xmath14 ) and @xmath15 is the flux quantum . in order to simulate positional disorder
we consider a uniform distribution of the @xmath16 whose average value @xmath17 is equal to @xmath18 every second column and zero otherwise .
the disorder configuration is thus specified by the probability distribution @xmath19 the parameter @xmath20 controls the degree of randomness and is related to the variance according to @xmath21 . of course , the presence of positional disorder effects the behaviour of the model .
in fact it has been shown by renormalization group techniques@xcite and monte carlo simulations@xcite that the critical temperatures associated to both @xmath5 and @xmath4 simmetries decrease with increasing disorder .
it has been also suggested for the @xmath4 transition a reentrant behaviour , even if recent work on the disordered unfrustrated xy model seems to exclude this possibility@xcite .
however , the critical behaviour that characterize the ising - like and the tkb transitions have not been studied to our knowledge . in particular , the study of the critical exponent @xmath7 associated to the divergence of the coherence lenght of the ising - like transitions is interesting in view of its possible connection with the @xmath22 characteristics reported by ling@xcite .
in fact the experimental data i - v , or equivalently the data j - e , scale very well according to the relation@xcite @xmath23 where the dynamical critical exponent @xmath24 is found to be about 2 and @xmath25 . this type of scaling is consistent with the reasonable assumption that the relevant excitations that contribute to the critical behaviour of the i - v characteristic are domain - wall . in order to obtain an estimation of @xmath7 we have calculated the binder s cumulant of the staggered magnetization @xmath26 @xmath27 where @xmath26 , associated to the chirality of each plaquette , is defined as @xmath28 in eq .
( [ m ] ) the chirality @xmath29 is the rotation of the current around a plaquette @xmath30 where @xmath31 is the phase difference at the edges of the plaquette .
binder s cumulant allows an accurate estimation of the critical temperature associated to the ordering of the plaquette chirality ( ising - like transition ) .
in fact @xmath32 does not depend on lattice size @xmath33 for large systems and , then , @xmath34 can be identified without making any assumption on the critical exponents .
once a satisfactory estimation of @xmath34 is obtained the critical exponent @xmath7 is estimated through a data collapsing with the parameter @xmath7 only .
the binder s cumulant @xmath35 has been calculated by monte carlo ( mc ) simulations using a standard metropolis dynamics . for each disorder configuration the mean value
@xmath36 has been obtained averaging over @xmath37 mc sweeps after discarding the first @xmath38 for equilibrating the system .
then the mean values are further averaged over a number of disorder configurations that range from @xmath39 to @xmath40 depending on lattice size and amount of disorder present in the system . in fig .
1 ) it is shown how the critical temperature @xmath41 can be extracted by using the mc estimations of @xmath35 for different lattice sizes . in the case reported in the figure ,
if we exclude the smallest lattice size , @xmath42 , all the data cross about @xmath43 . from this type of analysis
it is , then , possible to follow @xmath41 as a function of the disorder ( fig.2 ) ) .
the results confirm that @xmath41 decrease with increasing disorder going from @xmath44 for the case without disorder ( @xmath45 ) to @xmath46 for the case with largest disorder studied ( @xmath47 ) .
the results are in qualitative agreement with those reported by choi et al.@xcite . for larger values of the disorder preliminar results
seems to suggest a continous collaps of @xmath41 . in figs .
3a ) and 3b ) we show binder s cumulant @xmath35 as a function of @xmath48 for two values of @xmath20 . by using the estimated values of @xmath41 at @xmath49 and @xmath50 we see that the best data collapsing is obtained for @xmath51 in the case of lower disorder and for @xmath52 in the other case .
even if the numerical errors do not allow a very accurate estimation of @xmath7 it is very clear that already for very weak disorder ( @xmath53 ) the critical exponent is quite different from that expected in the ising model ( @xmath8 ) and from that suggested by granato et al.@xcite in the case without disorder .
instead the value obtained is very close to that extracted from the @xmath22 characteristics@xcite .
it is also interesting to note that a very similar value is obtained in the 2d xy spin glass that has a critical temperature @xmath54.@xcite the same analysis for @xmath45 and @xmath55 gives clearly @xmath56 and @xmath0 , respectively . on the other hand for the intermediate value @xmath57
the data are not able to clearly exclude either @xmath56 or @xmath0 ; larger lattices and more mc sweeps are needed to reach a satisfactory estimation of @xmath7 .
these results indicate the existence of a threshold disorder above which @xmath7 changes from 1 to 1.7 . the value of the threshold can be , then , estimated to be @xmath58 but it must be understood as an upper limit . as in the ffxy model
we expect the system to present a jump in the helicity modulus at temperature lower or equal to @xmath41 . in order to study this possibility
we have calculated the helicity modulus that for the system studied takes the form @xmath59 where @xmath60 and @xmath61 are the unitary vectors in the directions of the link @xmath62 and @xmath63 , respectively .
the symbol @xmath64 indicates the average over the spin configurations .
the elicity modulus @xmath65 has to be averaged further over the disorder configurations to obtain the mean value @xmath66 .
following the analysis developed for the xy model@xcite and extended to the ffxy model@xcite we can estimate the critical temperature @xmath67 by using the following ansatz for the size dependence of @xmath66 @xmath68 where @xmath69 corresponds to the universal jump expected at the critical temperature in a ktb transition .
this critical scaling , being based on the mapping between a neutral coulomb gas and a xy model , is valid only if the transition is of ktb type .
therefore eq .
( [ scaling ] ) can be used as a test for the existence of a standard ktb transition . in figs .
4a ) and 4b ) we show the results of this analysis for two different values of the disorder . in both cases
it is not possible to obtain a satisfactory fit of the data by using eq .
( [ scaling ] ) with @xmath70 .
however , a more accurate data analysis shows that a satisfying fitting of the data can be obtained assuming a helicity modulus jump larger than the universal value .
from such an analysis we get @xmath71 and @xmath72 for @xmath73 and @xmath74 and @xmath75 for @xmath76 in both cases the fitting parameter @xmath77takes the same value found in the ffxy model without disorder , @xmath78,@xcite and @xmath67 is slightly smaller than @xmath41 even if the estimated numerical error does not rule out @xmath79 in the case of lowest disorder ( @xmath73).@xcite this analysis shows that the only way to fit the data with eq.([scaling ] ) is to assume a larger helicity modulus jump and this is an indication that the transition associated to this jump is not a ktb transition .
summarizing we have calculated , by mc simulations , the critical temperature and the critical exponent @xmath7 associated to the chiral degree of freedom in a disordered ffxy model .
unexpected we find that the critical exponent @xmath80 already for very weak disorder becomes equal to the value found in the xy spin glass , i.e. @xmath81 correspondently , the helicity modulus jump becomes larger than the universal value expected in ktb transition .
finally , we note that the value obtained for @xmath7 is in agreement with recent results in josephson wire networks.@xcite j. villain , j. phys .
c * 10 * , 4793 ( 1977 ) t.c .
halsey , j. phys .
c * 18 * , 2437 ( 1985 ) for a review see : physica b * 222 * , 253 ( 1996 ) x.s .
ling , et al .
phys .
rev .
lett . * 76 * , 2989 ( 1996 ) e. granato and m.p .
nightingale , phys .
rev .
b * 48 * , 7438 ( 1993 ) s. teitel and c. jayaprakash , phys . rev .
b * 27 * , 598 ( 1983 ) ; phys . rev
. lett . * 51 * , 199 ( 1983 ) jooyoung lee , j.m .
kosterlitz and e. granato , phys .
rev .
b * 43 * , 11531 ( 1991 ) g. ramirez - santiago and j.v .
jos , phys .
rev .
b * 49 * , 9567 ( 1994 ) p. olsson , phys . rev . lett . *
75 * , 2758 ( 1995 ) g. grest , phys .
rev .
b * 39 * , 9267 ( 1989 ) p. olsson , phys . rev .
b * 55 * , 3585 ( 1997 ) e. granato and j.m .
kosterlitz , phys .
rev .
lett . * 62 * , 823 ( 1989 ) ; phys .
rev .
b * 33 * , 6533 ( 1986 ) v. cataudella and m. nicodemi , physica a * 233 * , 293 ( 1996 ) m.y . choi , j.s .
chung , and d. stroud , phys .
rev .
b * 35 , * 1669 ( 1987 ) stefan scheidl phys . rev .
b * 55 * , 457 ( 1997 ) ; m.c .
cha and h.a .
fertig , phys .
rev .
lett .
74 , 4867(1995 ) d.s .
fisher , m.p.a .
fisher and d. huse , phys .
rev .
b*43 * , 130 ( 1991 ) h.s .
bokil and a.p .
young , j. phys .
a * 29 * , l89 ( 1996 ) h. kawamura and m. tanemura , phys .
rev .
b * 36 * , 7177 ( 1987 ) p. ray and m.a . moore , phys . rev .
b * 45 * , 5361 ( 1992 ) h. weber and p. minnhagen , phys .
rev .
b * 37 * , 5986 ( 1988 ) the estimated values of @xmath67 and @xmath82 show that increasing the degree of disorder in the system the difference betwwen the two critical temperatures increases .
this is in agreement with the results reported by granato and kosterlitz @xcite
|
1 the binder s cumulant @xmath35 ( see eq.([binder ] ) ) vs. temperature @xmath83 for different sizes @xmath33 . at the critical temperature @xmath35 does not depend on @xmath33 for large @xmath33 .
3 the binder s cumulant ( see eq.([binder ] ) ) as a function of @xmath84 for two values of the parameter that controls the disorder @xmath20 . in fig.3a )
the data for @xmath73 are reported having choosen @xmath85 and @xmath8 . in fig.3b ) the data for @xmath50 are reported having choosen @xmath86 and @xmath87 .
temperature is in units of @xmath88 .
4 the scaled helicity modulus @xmath89 as a function of @xmath90 for two values of the parameter that controls the disorder @xmath20 . in fig.4a ) the data for @xmath73 and @xmath91 ( from below to the top )
are reported .
the best fit is given by the full curve that corresponds to eq.([scaling ] ) with @xmath92 and @xmath78 . in fig.4b )
the data for @xmath93 and @xmath94 ( from below to the top ) are reported .
the best fit is given by the full curve that corresponds to eq.([scaling ] ) with @xmath95 and @xmath78 .
|
binder s cumulant @xmath35 vs temperature @xmath83 different sizes @xmath33 critical temperature @xmath35 depend on @xmath33 large binder s cumulant function of @xmath84 for two values parameter disorder @xmath20 fig.3a data for @xmath73 @xmath85 @xmath8 .3b data @xmath50 @xmath86 @xmath87 temperature in units of @xmath88 scaled helicity modulus @xmath89 function of @xmath90 for two values parameter disorder @xmath20 fig.4a data for @xmath73 @xmath91 best fit full curve with @xmath92 and @xmath78 fig.4b data for @xmath93 @xmath94 best fit by full curve with @xmath95 and @xmath78
| 0.07088
| 320
| 176
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,449
|
we show that any @xmath0-component octonionic vector which is purely imaginary , but not quaternionic , is an eigenvector of a 6-parameter family of hermitian octonionic matrices , with imaginary eigenvalue equal to the associator of its elements .
|
the eigenvalue problem for @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrices , henceforth referred to as _ jordan matrices _ , contains some surprises .
notable among these is that , whereas each jordan matrix satisfies its characteristic equation , its real eigenvalues do not .
as shown in @xcite , each jordan matrix admits six real eigenvalues , rather than three .
however , the eigenvalues divide naturally into two families of three , and the corresponding families of eigenvectors do have the expected properties , such as orthonormality , provided that these properties are properly formulated . due to the nonassociativity of the octonions
, most jordan matrices also appear to admit eigenvalues which are not real ; several examples were discussed in @xcite .
however , to our knowledge there is no known algorithm for finding the non - real eigenvalues of such matrices , nor is it clear how many there are . in this paper , which is an extension of @xcite
, we take a different approach . rather than attempt to find the non - real eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of a given jordan matrix
, we instead find the jordan matrices which admit a given eigenvector / eigenvalue pair .
specifically , for any vector @xmath2 which is not quaternionic , we use the associator of the elements of @xmath3 as the eigenvalue , and find all jordan matrices for which @xmath3 is an eigenvector with that eigenvalue , which is nonzero by assumption .
we show below that a necessary condition for such matrices to exist is that @xmath4 , and that if this condition is satisfied there is a 6-parameter family of such matrices .
we begin in section [ octonions ] by reviewing the octonions and their properties , and then briefly summarize some known examples @xcite of @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrices with imaginary eigenvalues in section [ examples ] . in section [ results ] , we present our new results , which we then summarize in section [ conclusions ] , where we also propose some further conjectures .
= 3.5 in we use the standard basis @xmath5 for the quaternions @xmath6 , and we construct the octonions @xmath7 via the cayley - dickson process as @xmath8 .
the resulting multiplication table is neatly summarized by the oriented fano geometry shown in figure [ omult ] . as is well - known , the octonions are neither commutative nor associative .
writing the components of an octonion @xmath9 as @xmath10 we have @xmath11 and @xmath12 can be assumed without loss of generality to take the form @xmath13 by suitable choice of basis ; we refer to @xmath14 as _ generic octonions_. choosing @xmath15 the associator of @xmath3 is by definition the associator of its elements , that is @xmath16 = [ x , y , z ] = ( xy)z - x(yz ) = 2 x_2 y_3 z_8 \,k\ell\ ] ] with the last equality holding for generic octonions .
we seek solutions of the ( right ) eigenvalue problem @xmath17 where @xmath18 ; in what follows we will consider only the case @xmath19 \ne 0 $ ] , noting that @xmath20 $ ] is pure imaginary .
any jordan matrix can be written in the form @xmath21 with @xmath22 and @xmath23 .
then takes the form @xmath24 as shown below , admits solutions only if @xmath4 , in which case there is a family of jordan matrices @xmath25 which satisfy it .
little is known about solutions of with non - real eigenvalues .
although the problem of finding real eigenvalues for @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrices has been completely solved @xcite , no such solution exists for finding imaginary eigenvalues @xcite .
in fact , we know of only a handful of explicit examples of families of @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrices admitting imaginary eigenvalues , such as those given in @xcite , which are reproduced below .
note in each case that @xmath26 can always be chosen so that the eigenvalue has no real part .
furthermore , in the first example , the eigenvectors have no real part , the associator of each eigenvector is a ( possibly zero ) multiple of @xmath27 , the imaginary direction of the eigenvalue , and this last property also holds for the elements of @xmath28 .
however , the first two properties fail to hold in the second example , while the last property fails in the third .
[ [ example-1 ] ] example 1 + + + + + + + + + the matrix @xmath29 with @xmath30 and @xmath31 has , among others , the eigenvalues and eigenvectors , @xmath32 where @xmath33 [ [ example-2 ] ] example 2 + + + + + + + + + the matrix @xmath34 has , among others , the eigenvectors and eigenvalues , @xmath35 [ [ example-3 ] ] example 3 + + + + + + + + + the matrix @xmath36 admits the eigenvector @xmath37 with eigenvalue @xmath38
as already noted , for each example in the previous section , @xmath26 can be chosen so that a given eigenvalue is purely imaginary . more generally ,
the real part of an eigenvalue can be changed by adding a suitable multiple of the identity matrix to the original matrix .
more formally , we have the following result : the hermitian matrices having a given eigenvector can be divided into families which differ only by ( real ) multiples of the identity matrix .
the imaginary part of the corresponding eigenvalue is the same for each member of such a family , and each family contains a unique member such that the real part of the corresponding eigenvalue vanishes .
[ nonreal ] if @xmath3 is an eigenvector of @xmath25 with eigenvalue @xmath39 , then @xmath3 is also an eigenvector of @xmath40 for any @xmath41 , with eigenvalue @xmath42 . in particular
, @xmath3 is an eigenvector of @xmath43 , with eigenvalue @xmath44 .
note that this technique can in general be used to eliminate the real part of only one eigenvalue at a time . nonetheless , any eigenvector with a non - real eigenvalue is also an eigenvector of a closely related matrix with a purely imaginary eigenvalue .
this suggests the following strategy for trying to find eigenvectors with non - real eigenvalues : rather than trying to find eigenvector / eigenvalue pairs @xmath3 and @xmath39 satisfying for given @xmath25 , with @xmath39 non - real , we will instead seek to categorize the matrices which admit such eigenvalues .
lemma [ nonreal ] now tells us that we can assume @xmath45)=0 without loss of generality , at least so long as we consider only a single eigenvector .
we will therefore attempt to find the matrices @xmath25 which admit a given vector @xmath3 as an eigenvector , with given eigenvalue @xmath39 satisfying @xmath45)=0 .
motivated by the first example , we will further assume that @xmath39 is a real multiple of @xmath20 $ ] , and we will consider only the case where @xmath20\ne0 $ ] . finally , by rescaling @xmath25 , the constant of proportionality can be assumed to be @xmath46 .
thus , we assume that @xmath47 \ne 0\ ] ] since @xmath20\ne0 $ ] by assumption , none of @xmath14 can be zero .
in particular , @xmath48 , and it is straightforward to solve for @xmath49 and for @xmath50 , yielding @xmath51 inserting these expressions into reduces to the form @xmath52 _ if @xmath20\ne0 $ ] , then @xmath53 , that is , @xmath54 . _ multiply both sides of on the left by @xmath55 .
the lhs of the resulting expression must be real , since the rhs is , but direct computation shows that the coefficient of @xmath56 on the left is @xmath57 .
since each factor except for @xmath58 is nonzero by assumption , @xmath58 must be zero .
if @xmath20\ne0 $ ] , then there are no solutions to unless @xmath4 . direct computation , as follows .
inserting @xmath54 into , the @xmath59-component yields @xmath60 . since each factor except for @xmath61 is nonzero by assumption , @xmath62 . in a separate computation
, the @xmath63-component of can be solved for @xmath64 , yielding @xmath65 inserting the result into the @xmath66-component of , along with @xmath67 , results in @xmath68 , which forces @xmath69 .
finally , the @xmath70- and @xmath71-components of can be solved for @xmath72 and @xmath73 , yielding @xmath74 and the result inserted into the @xmath63-component ( along with @xmath75 and the above expression for @xmath64 ) , resulting in @xmath76 , which forces @xmath77 .
thus , @xmath4 . _
if @xmath20\ne0 $ ] and @xmath4 , then there is a 6-parameter family of solutions to _ .
[ result ] inserting the above expressions for @xmath72 , @xmath73 and @xmath64 , as well as the condition @xmath4 , into results in a single nonzero component , which can be solved for @xmath78 , yielding @xmath79 as with the equations solved above for @xmath72 , @xmath73 and @xmath64 , the relevant coefficients are nonzero under the stated assumptions , so that the given solutions always exist .
we have thus constructed @xmath25 explicitly , with @xmath80 , @xmath81 , @xmath82 , @xmath26 , @xmath83 , and @xmath84 as free parameters .
we have created a method for finding a hermitian matrix @xmath85 which has an eigenvalue relationship with an imaginary vector @xmath2 , with the associator of @xmath3 , assumed to be nonzero , playing the role of the eigenvalue @xmath39 . for our method to be successful , rather than fixing the matrix
, we must begin by fixing the vector @xmath3 , thus fixing @xmath39 as well .
the question we must ask is if the resulting eigenvalue / eigenvector system from our construction method represents a variation of one of the existing three family examples presented by dray , janesky and manogue @xcite . the last two eigenvectors in example 1 satisfy the conditions of theorem [ result ] ( vanishing real part and non - vanishing associator ) , and @xmath26 and @xmath86 can be chosen so that the eigenvalue is precisely the vector associator , as required by our hypotheses .
it is straightforward to verify that the corresponding matrix @xmath28 is indeed contained in the 6-parameter family constructed in theorem [ result ] .
lemma [ nonreal ] can now be used , along with some obvious renormalization , to construct the matrices @xmath28 for any values of @xmath26 and @xmath86 . in this sense ,
example 1 is contained within our solution method , although our method generates many more solutions but can not yet handle the first eigenvector shown , whose associator vanishes . each of the eigenvectors in examples 2 and 3 , however , either has a non - zero real part or a vanishing associator , so that our results do not apply to these cases .
note that in example 2 , although the imaginary part of the eigenvalues is indeed in the direction of @xmath87 $ ] ( the associator of the elements of @xmath88 ) , namely @xmath27 , none of the given eigenvectors has an associator in this direction .
furthermore , in example 3 , the imaginary part of the eigenvalue no longer points in the direction of the matrix associator @xmath89 $ ] .
these examples therefore make clear that the results in this paper represent only the tip of the iceberg ; our assumptions are too restrictive . by understanding more about the problems encountered in trying to find a characteristic eigenvalue equation for @xmath1 hermitian matrices over the octonions ,
we hope our work will aid in the discovery of a method for finding the imaginary eigenvalues ( if any ) , and their corresponding eigenvectors , for any given @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrix .
|
eigenvalue problem for @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrices jordan matrices contains surprises each jordan matrix satisfies characteristic equation real eigenvalues do not each matrix admits six real eigenvalues three eigenvalues divide into two families of three eigenvectors have expected properties orthonormality properly formulated due to nonassociativity of octonions most jordan matrices admit eigenvalues not real examples discussed in @xcite no known algorithm for finding non - real eigenvalues how many in this paper extension of different approach non - real eigenvalues find jordan matrices admit given eigenvector / eigenvalue pair for vector @xmath2 not quaternionic use associator of elements of @xmath3 as eigenvalue find all jordan matrices for @xmath3 eigenvector with eigenvalue nonzero by assumption necessary condition for matrices is @xmath4 if 6-parameter family of matrices begin reviewing octonions properties summarize examples of @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrices with imaginary eigenvalues in section examplessection results present new results summarize conclusions propose further conjectures use standard basis @xmath5 for quaternions @xmath6 construct octonions @xmath7 as @xmath8 multiplication table summarized oriented fano geometry figure octonions neither commutative nor associative writing components octonion @xmath9 as @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 assumed form @xmath13 refer @xmath14 generic octonions choosing @xmath15 associator @xmath3 associator elements @xmath16 = [ x , y z ] = ( xy)z - x(yz ) = 2 x_2 y_3 z_8 last equality for generic octonions seek solutions eigenvalue problem @xmath17 @xmath18 consider case @xmath19 @xmath20 pure imaginary jordan matrix written form @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 form @xmath24 admits solutions if @xmath4 family jordan matrices @xmath25 satisfy little known solutions non - real eigenvalues problem finding real eigenvalues @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrices solved no solution imaginary eigenvaluesknow handful examples of families of @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrices admitting imaginary eigenvalues in @xcite reproduced below @xmath26 be chosen eigenvalue has no real part first example eigenvectors have no real part associator eigenvector is zero multiple of @xmath27 imaginary direction eigenvalue last property holds for elements @xmath28 first two properties fail hold in second example last property fails in third example-1 matrix @xmath29 with @xmath30 @xmath31 has eigenvalues and eigenvectors @xmath32 @xmath33 matrix @xmath34 has eigenvectors eigenvalues @xmath35 example-3 matrix @xmath36 admits eigenvector @xmath37 with eigenvalue @xmath38 @xmath26 can be chosen eigenvalue is purely imaginary real part of eigenvalue can be changed by adding suitable multiple of identity matrix to original matrix hermitian matrices eigenvector divided into families differ by real multiples of identity matrix imaginary part of eigenvalue same for each member family each family contains unique member real part eigenvalue vanishesnonreal if @xmath3 eigenvector of @xmath25 with @xmath39 also eigenvector of @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath3 eigenvector of @xmath43 with eigenvalue @xmath44 technique eliminate real part one eigenvalue eigenvector non - real eigenvalue eigenvector of related matrix with imaginary eigenvalue suggests strategy for eigenvectors with non - real eigenvalues pairs @xmath3 and @xmath39 satisfying @xmath25 categorize matrices eigenvalues nonreal assume @xmath45)=0 without loss of generality single eigenvector attempt to find matrices @xmath25 admit @xmath3 with eigenvalue @xmath39 satisfying @xmath45)=0 assume @xmath39 real multiple of @xmath20 $ consider only case where @xmath20\ne0 $ ] rescaling @xmath25 constant of proportionality assumed @xmath46 assume @xmath47 \ne 0 since @xmath20\ne0 $ none of @xmath14 can be zero @xmath48 solve @xmath49 @xmath50 yielding @xmath51 reduces @xmath52 @xmath20\ne0 $ ] @xmath53 @xmath54 multiply sides by @xmath55 lhs expression real coefficient @xmath56 is @xmath57 each factor @xmath58 nonzero @xmath58 must be zero if @xmath20\ne0 $ ] no solutions @xmath4 inserting @xmath54 @xmath59-component yields @xmath60 each factor @xmath61 nonzero @xmath62 @xmath63-component solved for @xmath64 yielding @xmath65 inserting result into @xmath66-component results @xmath68 forces @xmath69 @xmath70- @xmath71-components solved for @xmath72 @xmath73 yielding @xmath74 result @xmath63-component @xmath75 expression @xmath64 resulting @xmath76 forces @xmath77 @xmath4 if @xmath20\ne0 $ ] @xmath4 6-parameter family solutionsinserting expressions for @xmath72 condition @xmath4 results in single nonzero component solved for @xmath78 yielding @xmath79 with equations solved for @xmath72 relevant coefficients are nonzero under assumptions solutions always exist constructed @xmath25 with @xmath80 as free parameters created method for finding hermitian matrix @xmath85 eigenvalue relationship with imaginary vector @xmath2 associator @xmath3 nonzero eigenvalue @xmath39 for method matrix fixing vector @xmath3 fixing @xmath39 question if resulting eigenvalue / eigenvector system variation of three family examples by dray janesky manogue last two eigenvectors in example 1 satisfy conditions of theorem [ result ] vanishing real part non - vanishing associator @xmath26 @xmath86 chosen eigenvalue is vector associator verify corresponding matrix @xmath28 in 6-parameter family in theorem [ result ] lemma [ nonreal ] used renormalization to construct matrices @xmath28 for values of @xmath26 @xmath86example 1 within our solution method generates solutions handle first eigenvector associator vanishes eigenvectors in examples 2 and 3 has non - zero part or vanishing associator results apply in example 2 imaginary part eigenvalues in direction of @xmath87 $ ] ( associator of @xmath88 @xmath27 none eigenvectors has associator in this direction in example 3 imaginary part eigenvalue no longer points in matrix associator @xmath89 $ ] examples results represent tip of iceberg assumptions too restrictive understanding problems characteristic eigenvalue equation for @xmath1 hermitian matrices hope work method for finding imaginary eigenvalues corresponding eigenvectors for @xmath1 hermitian octonionic matrix
| 0.435089
| 2,841
| 1,508
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,457
|
in order to prepare the analysis of corot data , it has been decided to build a simple tool to simulate the expected light curves .
this simulation tools takes into account both instrumental constraints and astrophysical inputs for the corot targets .
for example , granulation and magnetic activity signatures are simulated , as well as p modes , with the expected photon noise . however , the simulations rely sometimes on simple approach of these phenomenons , as the main goal of this tool is to prepare the analysis in the case of corot data and not to perform the most realistic simulations of the different phenomenons .
|
simulating the data that a space instrument like corot will provide might look presomptuous .
indeed , it is certainly , when comparing to previous comparable instruments like iphir or golf .
these two examples show that the nominal behaviour of the instrument is not always reached , but this does not prevent this instrument to provide very interesting data .
however , despite some technical problems , iphir and golf yielded a wealth of scientific results .
thus , what is the interest of simulating corot data ? how close to reality these simualtions will get ? this might not be the most important fact as the preparation of these simulations will help us to prepare the analysis of real data and to be ready in case of unexpected technical behaviour of the instrument perturbating the data , or unexpected physical behaviour of the targets of the instrument .
a consequence of that is that the simulation tool must include technical and physical aspects , making the task even more difficult .
these aspects cover : photon noise , p modes excitation , granulation signal , stellar activity signal , orbital perturbations , stellar rotation ... the software presented here is freely available at : + www.lesia.obspm.fr/@xmath0corotswg/simulightcurve.html
the photon noise is certainly the easiest component of the noise to simulate ... as far as it has the expected behaviour : a true white noise with a variance depending on the photon counts .
the corot specifications impose a level of photon noise of @xmath1 ppm in the amplitude spectrum of a star of magitude @xmath2 for an observing duration of 5 days . the stellar flux for a given magnitude @xmath3 being related to the stellar magnitude by : @xmath4 and knowing that the level of noise varies as the square root of the flux , the level of noise is related to the star magnitude by : @xmath5 as indicated above , this simple relation can model the photon noise but not some other photon counting perturbations as slow ( periods of hours or more ) trends in photon countings which might contributes to the low frequency spectrum of the noise .
the solar - like oscillations are stochastically excited and simulated here following the recipe of @xcite , recalled below .
each solar - like oscillation is a superposition of a large number of excited and damped proper modes .
each solar - like oscillation can then be decomposed as : @xmath6 \ , exp[-\eta ( t - t_j ) ] h(t - t_j ) + { \rm c.c } \label{simu : eq1}\ ] ] where @xmath7 is the amplitude at which the mode @xmath8 with proper frequency @xmath9 is excited by turbulent convection , @xmath10 at which it is excited , @xmath11 is the ( linear ) mode damping rate , @xmath12 is the heaviside function and `` c.c .
'' means complex conjugate .
the fourier transform of eq.[simu : eq1 ] yields the spectrum : @xmath13 whith @xmath14 , @xmath15 and @xmath16 is a complex number proportional to @xmath17 $ ] .
as the excitations are random , @xmath10 is random and hence @xmath16 has a random phase .
as the excitation are very numerous , according to the central limit princip the real and imaginary parts of the complex number @xmath18 are distributed according to a normal statitics .
hence the spectrum of the oscillations , @xmath19 , can be simulated by generating the real and imaginary parts of the complex number @xmath18 according to a normal statitics .
an inverse fourier transform is next applied in order to simulate the oscillations in the time domain .
this is the principe of the @xcite s recipe .
the question is now that is the constraints on the mean and variance of @xmath18 . from eq.[simu :
eq2 ] we deduce the power spectrum @xmath20 of the oscillation : @xmath21 the mean mode profile @xmath22 is obtained by averaging eq.[simu : eq3 ] over a larger number of realizations : @xmath23 where @xmath24 , which is by definition the variance of the complex number @xmath18 since @xmath25 .
we see from eq.[simu : eq4 ] that the mean profile has a lorentzian shape as it is in first approximation observed . according to the parseval - plancherel relation ,
@xmath12 is related to the mean square of the mode intrinsic amplitude in terms of luminosity fluctuations , @xmath26 , as ( see eg .
@xcite ) : @xmath27 where @xmath28 is a visibilty factors , which depends on the degree @xmath29 .
once the mode intrinsic amplitude @xmath30 , the mode line width @xmath31 and @xmath28 are given , we have then a constraint on the variance of @xmath18 .
note that the derivation of eqs.[simu : eq2]-[simu : eq5 ] assumes that the the mode life - time ( @xmath32 ) is much shorter than the duration of the observation ( @xmath33 ) , that is @xmath34 .
for life - times much longer than @xmath33 , different expressions are derived but the principe of the simulation remains the same . for sake of simplicity , we use the adiabatic assumption formulated by @xcite to deduce the maximum of @xmath30 from the maximum of the root mean square mode velocity @xmath35 according to : @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the effective temperature and the symbol @xmath38 refers to quantities related to the sun .
we take for the sun the _ rms values _ @xmath39 ppm ( see table 2 in @xcite and more recently @xcite ) and @xmath40 27 cm / s according to @xcite s seismic observations . in turn
the root mean square of the mode intrinsic velocity , @xmath41 , is related to the rate @xmath42 at which energy is injected into the mode by turbulent convection and the mode damping rate @xmath43 as : @xmath44 where @xmath45 is the mode mass , @xmath46 the mode inertia , @xmath47 the mode radial displacement and @xmath48 the height above the photosphere where oscillations are measured ( we consider @xmath49 ) . the way the quantities involved in eq.[simu : eq6 ] are model is explained in the next two sects .
theoretical mode damping rates are obtained from the tables calculated by @xcite .
these calculations rely on the non - local and time - dependent formulation of the convection of @xcite ( for more details , see @xcite ) .
the computation of the excitation rates @xmath42 is performed according to the model of stochastic excitation of @xcite .
the calculations assume - as in @xcite - a lorenzian function for modelling the convective eddy time - correlations .
furthermore , the characteritic wavenumber @xmath50 involved in the theory is assumed to be constant according to the simplification proposed by @xcite .
its value is related to the value @xmath51 inferred in @xcite from a 3d simulation of the sun as : @xmath52 where @xmath53 is the mixing - length evaluated at the layer the convective velocity is maximum .
the solar model we consider is calculated with the cesam code ( @xcite ) and appropriate input physics , described in details in @xcite .
in particular , convection is modelled according to the classical mixing - length theory ( * ? ? ? * hereafter mlt ) with a mixing - length @xmath54 where @xmath55 is the pressure scale height and @xmath56 is the mixing - length parameter .
in contrast with @xcite , the atmosphere is restored from the eddington classical gray atmosphere and microscopic diffusion is included according to the simplified formalism of @xcite .
the calibration of the solar model , in luminosity and radius for an age of @xmath57 gyr , fixes the initial helium content @xmath58 , metallicity @xmath59 and the mlt parameter @xmath60 .
the oscillation eigenfunctions and hence the mode masses , @xmath61 , in eq .
[ simu : eq6 ] are calculated with the adiabatic adipls pulsation code ( @xcite ) .
granulation can be considered as noise if the aim of the observation is the stellar oscillations , but it carries some information about the physics of the star , and very valuable information as the convection is a very badly described phenomenon in stellar modelling .
thus , we call it a @xmath62 and not a noise . however , granulation can be described only with a statistical approach . moreover ,
its contribution in the fourier domain is not independent of frequency : it will contribute more at low frequency .
a common description is to consider that signal @xmath63 as a random signal with some memory : then , its autocorrelation function is : @xmath64 where @xmath65 is the amplitude of this signal ( to be related to its variance ) and @xmath66 a characteristic time . knowing that the fourier transform of the autocorrelation function is the squared modulus of the function @xmath63 , one has : @xmath67 thus , the fourier spectrum of the granulation is modelled as a lorentzian which , if it is summed over all frequencies , yields the variance of the signal and then its relation with @xmath65 : @xmath68 so , knowing the intensity standard deviation due to granulation and its characteristic time , it is possible to model its fourier spectrum ( and considering its phase is random , it is possible to model the corresponding time series by an inverse fourier transform ) .
this is in fact the approach developped by @xcite to model the solar noise spectrum , including granulation , mesogranulation and supergranulation .
it can be used to describe any noise with memory ( some electronic noise for example ) . in the case of granulation ,
the required parameters are estimated from theory of convection .
the eddy size @xmath69 is assumed to be equal to @xmath70 where @xmath71 is the mixing - length parameter and @xmath55 the pressure scale height .
the eddy overturn time is related to the eddy convective velocity , @xmath72 , by @xmath73 and is considered as the characteristic time of granulation @xmath66 .
the number of number of eddies seen at the star surface , @xmath74 , is @xmath75 where @xmath76 is the star radius .
this relation ignores of course that the medium is higly anisotropic .
according to the mixing - length theory ( see eg .
@xcite ) , the eddies contrast ( border / center of the granule ) , @xmath77 , can be related to the difference between the temperature gradient of the eddy , @xmath78 and that of the surrounding medium , @xmath79 , according to the relation : @xmath80 in turn , eq .
[ dl_l_eddy ] can be reduced to : @xmath81 where @xmath82 is the convection efficiency and @xmath83 the ratio between the convective flux and the total flux of energy .
this relation is finally calibrated in order to match the solar constraints , and the intensity standard deviation for the whole observed disc is @xmath84 all the quantities are obtained on 1d stellar models computed as explained in sect .
[ sect : solar - like - exc ] .
the stellar magnetic activity will induce intensity variation in time , mainly due to the presence of starspots crossing the observed disc because of the rotation .
however , some other sources of intensity variations are expected ( flares for example ) .
a first approach is to consider the intensity variations as described by the same way than granulation . knowing the standard deviation and the characteristic time of intensity variations allows to build the fourier spectrum of these variations as a lorentzian .
this approach has been used for example by @xcite .
the difficulty in the case of magnetic activity is that there is no theoretical description of the phenomenon .
thus , the parameters describing it are empirically derived .
+ the characteristic time is taken as the period of rotation of the star , or , if the rotation is slow , the instrinsic lifetime of a spot .
the latter is arbitrarily chosen as the one in the solar case , computed by @xcite .
the rotation period is computed from an empirical law involving the age and the @xmath85 color index of the star described in the same reference .
+ the standard deviation of intensity variations due to magnetic activity is also derived from an empirical law .
however , this law involves the rossby number @xmath86 ( ratio of rotation period @xmath87 and the overturn convective time at the base of the convection zone @xmath88 ) .
this number can be derived empirically @xcite , but in the present simulations , we derive @xmath88 from models
. then we use empirical laws to estimate @xmath89 .
another approach is to simulate in the intensity time series the influence of individual spots , to estimate their number and contrast ( as for example @xcite ) .
the expected result in the fourier spectrum should be similar to the first approach , but this detailed simulation should allow for rotation measurements .
this approach will be included in a further version of our simulation software . , showing that the p modes are easily detected , as well as granulation and activity , width=359 ]
a first example of the output of this software is shown in fig.[comp_sun ] : a simulation of a sun with a magnitude @xmath90 ( in order to have a very weak phoon noise ) is compared with a spectrum from the loi photometer ( @xcite ) onboard soho .
the agreement between simulation and ovservation is good , except maybe at very low frequency : the activity component of the signal is overestimated in the simulation ( this is explained as the sun does not fit very well the empirical law used for activity estimation ) . + the following example is a sun with a magnitude @xmath91 , showing that both p modes and activity should be visible with corot for such a star ( fig.[sun_m6 ] ) .
another example is shown in fig.[star1.5_m8 ] for a star of 1.5 solar mass and an age of 2.4 gyr : again , p modes and activity are detectable . for a star with a mass @xmath92 and a magnitude @xmath93 , showing also p modes , granulation and activity signatures , width=359 ]
this simulator software will continue to evolve with time . as indicated above ,
intensity modulation due to starspots will be included , as well as other stellar or instrumental signals , as for example instrumental perturbations due to orbital vraiations .
moreover , this effort of simulation will not end with the delivery of first data but will be continued after that .
the comparison with real data will allow to check for the validity of physical hypothesis used to simulate the different signals of astrophysics origin in the data .
this shoud bring a great amount of information on our knowmedge of these often not well known phenomena , which stellar simulation is often derived from the solar case . in parallel , the simulation of instrumental components of the signal will be improved to help the interpretation of real data .
all these reasons justify in our opinion the need for the simulation tool presented here . ,
c. , de ridder , j. , mazumdar , a. , et al .
2004 , in proceedings of the soho 14 / gong 2004 workshop ( esa sp-559 ) .
`` helio- and asteroseismology : towards a golden future '' .
12 - 16 july , 2004 .
new haven , connecticut , usa . editor : d. danesy .
|
simulating data space instrument corot might look presomptuous comparing to instruments like iphir or golf nominal behaviour not always reached prevent interesting data despite technical problems iphir golf yielded scientific results interest of simulating corot data ? close to reality ? not important preparation simulations analysis real data ready unexpected technical behaviour or physical behaviour simulation tool must include technical physical aspects task difficult aspects cover photon noise p modes excitation granulation signal stellar activity signal orbital perturbations stellar rotation software available at www.lesia.obspm.fr/@xmath0corotswg/simulightcurve.html photon noise easiest to simulate expected behaviour true white noise with variance depending on photon counts corot specifications impose photon noise of @xmath1 ppm in amplitude spectrum star magitude @xmath2 for observing duration 5 days stellar flux for magnitude @xmath3 related to stellar magnitude by @xmath4 level of noise varies as square root flux related to star magnitude by @xmath5 relation can model photon noise not other photon counting perturbations as slow trends in photon countings to low frequency spectrum noisesolar - oscillations excited simulated following recipe @xcite each oscillation superposition of excited damped modes decomposed as @xmath6 exp[- ( t - t_j ) ] h(t - t_j ) + { \rm c.c } : eq1 @xmath7 amplitude mode @xmath8 @xmath9 excited by convection @xmath10 @xmath11 damping rate @xmath12 heaviside function c.c . complex conjugate fourier transform of eq.[simu : eq1 yields spectrum @xmath13 complex number proportional to @xmath17 excitations random @xmath10 random @xmath16 random phase numerous real imaginary parts of complex number @xmath18 distributed according to normal statitics spectrum oscillations @xmath19 simulated by generating parts inverse fourier transform simulate oscillations in time domain principe of @xcite s recipe constraints on mean variance of @xmath18 from eq.[simu eq2 deduce power spectrum @xmath20 of oscillation @xmath21 mean mode profile @xmath22 obtained averaging eq.[simu : eq3 ] realizations @xmath23 @xmath24 variance of complex number @xmath18 since @xmath25 eq4 mean profile lorentzian shape parseval - plancherel relation @xmath12 related to mean square mode intrinsic amplitude luminosity fluctuations @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 visibilty factors depends on degree @xmath29 mode intrinsic amplitude @xmath30 mode line width @xmath31 @xmath28 given constraint on variance @xmath18 derivation eqs. eq2]- eq5 assumes mode life - time @xmath32 ) shorter than duration observation @xmath33 @xmath34 life - times longer than @xmath33 different expressions derived principe simulation same adiabatic assumption deduce maximum @xmath30 from maximum root mean square mode velocity @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 effective temperature symbol @xmath38 quantities related sun sun rms values @xmath39 ppm @xmath40 27 cm / s @xcite s seismic observationsroot mean square mode intrinsic velocity @xmath41 related to rate @xmath42 energy injected by turbulent convection mode damping rate @xmath43 @xmath45 mass inertia radial displacement height above photosphere oscillations measured @xmath49 quantities in eq. eq6 ] model explained next sects theoretical mode damping rates obtained from tables calculated by @xcite calculations rely on non - local time - dependent formulation convection @xcite computation excitation rates @xmath42 model stochastic excitation @xcite calculations assume lorenzian function for convective eddy time - correlations characteritic wavenumber @xmath50 assumed constant value related to value @xmath51 inferred @xcite from 3d simulation sun @xmath53 mixing - length at layer convective velocity maximum solar model calculated with cesam code ( @xcite ) appropriate input physics convection modelled classical mixing - length theory with mixing - length @xmath54 @xmath55 pressure scale height @xmath56 mixing - length parametercontrast with @xcite atmosphere restored from classical gray atmosphere microscopic diffusion included formalism calibration solar model luminosity radius for age @xmath57 gyr fixes initial helium content @xmath58 metallicity @xmath59 mlt parameter @xmath60 oscillation eigenfunctions mode masses @xmath61 in calculated with adiabatic adipls pulsation code ( @xcite granulation noise if stellar oscillations carries information about physics star valuable convection badly in stellar modelling call it @xmath62 not noise granulation described with statistical approach contribution in fourier domain not independent of frequency more at low frequency signal @xmath63 as random signal with memory autocorrelation function is @xmath64 @xmath65 amplitude related to variance @xmath66 characteristic time fourier transform is modulus of function @xmath63 @xmath67 fourier spectrum granulation modelled as lorentzian summed over frequencies yields variance signal relation with @xmath65 : @xmath68 knowing intensity standard deviation due to granulation characteristic time possible to model fourier spectrum time series by inverse fourier transformapproach developped by @xcite to model solar noise spectrum including granulation mesogranulation supergranulation used to describe noise with memory electronic noise granulation parameters estimated from theory of convection eddy size @xmath69 equal to @xmath70 @xmath71 mixing - length parameter @xmath55 pressure scale height eddy overturn time related to convective velocity characteristic time of granulation number of eddies at star surface @xmath74 is @xmath75 @xmath76 is star radius relation ignores medium higly anisotropic mixing - length theory eddies contrast related to difference between temperature gradient of eddy @xmath78 surrounding medium relation @xmath80 dl_l_eddy reduced to @xmath81 @xmath82 is convection efficiency @xmath83 ratio between convective flux and total flux of energy relation calibrated to match solar constraints intensity standard deviation for observed disc is @xmath84 quantities obtained on 1d stellar models computed in stellar magnetic activity intensity variation in due to starspots crossing disc other sources of intensity variations expected ( flaresfirst approach consider intensity variations granulation knowing standard deviation characteristic time build fourier spectrum lorentzian approach used by @xcite difficulty magnetic activity no theoretical description parameters empirically derived characteristic time as period rotation star or instrinsic lifetime of spot latter arbitrarily chosen solar case computed by @xcite rotation period computed from empirical law age @xmath85 color index star standard deviation of intensity variations due magnetic activity derived from empirical law law involves rossby number @xmath86 ( ratio of rotation period @xmath87 overturn convective time convection zone @xmath88 ) number derived empirically @xcite present simulations derive @xmath88 from models use empirical laws estimate @xmath89 another approach simulate intensity time series influence of individual spots estimate number contrast @xcite expected result fourier spectrum similar to first approach detailed simulation allow rotation measurements approach included in further version simulation software p modes easily detected granulation activity first example output software shown in fig.[comp_sun simulation of sun magnitude @xmath90 weak phoon noise compared with spectrum loi photometer @xcite ) soho agreement between simulation ovservation good except low frequency activity component signal overestimated simulation sun fit empirical law for activity estimation example sun with magnitude @xmath91 p modes activity visible with corot star fig.[sun_m6 ] example.[star1.5_m8 ] star 1.5 solar mass age 2.4 gyr p modes activity detectable star mass @xmath92 magnitude @xmath93 showing p modes granulation activity signatures width=359 simulator software evolve with time intensity modulation due to starspots included other stellar instrumental signals instrumental perturbations due to orbital vraiations simulation not end first data continued comparison with real data validity of physical hypothesis signals astrophysics origin information on known phenomena stellar simulation derived from solar case simulation of instrumental components signal improved interpretation real data reasons justify need for simulation tool c. de ridder , j. mazumdar , a. al . 2004 proceedings soho 14 / gong 2004 workshop ( esa sp-559 )helio asteroseismology golden future 12 - 16 july 2004 new haven connecticut danesy
| 0.571949
| 3,437
| 1,764
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,458
|
we report on measurements of the @xmath0 production cross section at a center - of - mass energy of 1.96 tev at the d experiment during run ii of the fermilab tevatron collider .
we use candidate events in lepton+jets and dilepton final states . in the most sensitive channel ( lepton+jets channel ) , a neural network algorithm that uses lifetime information to identify b - quark jets is used to distinguish signal from background processes .
we also present measurements of single top quark production at d using several multivariate techniques to separate signal from background .
|
top quark is the heaviest elementary particle known to - date discovered at fermilab in 1995 @xcite . during the current run ii period of the tevatron accelerator ,
the growing statistics permits to study in detail further kinematic properties of the top pair production as well as recently observed electroweak production of individual top quarks .
we preset the latest results on the @xmath0 cross sections measurements , their combination and interpretation in terms of limits on new physics .
we summarise the current state of the observation of the single top quark production and the measurements and searches based on the @xmath1 vertex properties .
as the top quark was first observed produced in @xmath0 pairs via the strong interaction , the pair production is the obvious first handle to test perturbative quantum chromodynamics ( pqcd ) while the decaying system properties can be used as an electroweak laboratory to search for new physics . at tevatron
the production proceeds mostly via @xmath2 annihilation ( 85% ) accompanied by the @xmath3 fusion ( 15% ) .
the final states of the @xmath0 system are determined by the leptonic , hadronic or mixed decays modes of the @xmath4-bosons .
the dilepton ( @xmath5 ) final state is easy to identify , has low background , but also low branching fraction ; the @xmath6jet channels ( with prompt @xmath7 or cascade @xmath8 ) have larger branching fraction , more background , but have only one escaping neutrino ; the hadronic channel has the largest branching ratio , but suffers from overwhelming background from qcd multijet production .
dedicated @xmath9jets analyses are challenged by the @xmath10 lepton identification , but provide important additional information and offer windows on testing new models with prominent couplings to @xmath10 .
the cross - section analysis in the @xmath6jets was divided into several bins in terms of the jet multiplicity , with @xmath11 + 1,2 jets serving as a control sample to tune selection and data / simulation agreement , and the 3 and @xmath12 jet bins ( with larger signal fraction ) for the measurement itself .
we required at least one jet identified as a @xmath13-jet using a neural network ( nn ) @xmath13-tagger , one isolated lepton and large missing transverse energy .
additionally the leading jet @xmath14 was required to be @xmath15gev .
most of standard model backgrounds were modelled using alpgen+pythia parton shower , including theory nlo / lo scale factors .
the largest physics background comes from the @xmath16jets events , other backgrounds include diboson and single top production .
as there is no reliable model of the multijet production beyond several final state hard partons , the multijet background was taken from a special data with inverted cut on the lepton isolation .
the signal fraction grows with the number of the @xmath13-tagged jets ( see figure [ fig : ljjets ] , left ) . a kinematic likelihood discriminant based on several topological and kinematic variables ( see figure [ fig : ljjets ] , right )
was employed to fit the @xmath0 fraction and the cross - section .
cross - section measurements in @xmath6jets , @xmath5 and @xmath17 channels were combined using a total of 14 orthogonal channels , the combined cross - section was fitted using a likelihood function with poisson terms for signal and background yields .
systematic uncertainties are included using gaussian probability density function .
the combined result is @xmath18 , assuming @xmath19 @xcite .
the systematic uncertainties dominate the error on this result .
we also provide the ratios of cross - sections between the channels @xmath20 , where most of systematics cancel , leading to results on @xmath21 and @xmath22 which are consistent with the sm value of 1 and are shown in figure [ fig : xsect_combi_d0_cdf ] .
in addition , cross - section ratios between individual channels can be used to set upper limits on the @xmath23 branching ratio , as for @xmath24 one would observe an enhancement of the @xmath10 channel ( using @xmath25 ) .
leptophobic @xmath26 would lead to an enhancement of the @xmath6jets channel ( using @xmath27 .
we extracted the expected and observed upper limits as shown in figure [ fig : ttbar_h_limits ] using pseudo - experiments derived from the data distributions .
the current tevatron @xmath28 combined measurement is precise to @xmath29gev @xcite , triggering discussions on the definition and interpretations of the top mass which is actually measured .
a complementary information on @xmath28 with different sensitivity to theoretical and experimental uncertainties can be extracted from the @xmath30 dependence .
assuming different @xmath31 , the measured @xmath0 cross - section can be compared to nlo and approximate nnlo ( nll ) calculations , where @xmath28 definition is usually the pole mass .
the extracted values of @xmath28 range from @xmath32 to @xmath33gev depending on the theory used , with errors of @xmath34gev , being in good agreement with the world - average of @xmath35gev @xcite as depicted in figure [ fig : mass_from_xsect ] .
the electroweak ( single ) top quark production had been one of the remaining sm processes to be observed until recently @xcite , with the evidences for single top production reported by the tevatron collider experiments in 2007 @xcite and 2008 @xcite . indeed , this process has a much larger background and smaller cross - section compared to the @xmath0 production . at the same time ,
observation of the single top production is rewarding in providing a direct access to the @xmath1 vertex properties and another window to new physics .
two basic production modes can be distinguished at lo , denoted the @xmath36 and @xmath37-channels . the basic experimental requirements to measure the single top cross - section include the selection of events with one isolated lepton and at least two jets with at least one with @xmath38gev .
in addition , the missing transverse energy ( @xmath39-signature ) is required to be @xmath40gev in the two - jet ( @xmath41 ) bin .
one or two of the jets is required to originate from @xmath13-hadrons using the secondary vertex information incorporated into a neural net @xmath13-tagger . selecting 4,519 @xmath13-tagged events
, we expect @xmath42 single top events with signal acceptances of 3.7% ( 2.5% ) for @xmath43 ( @xmath44 ) .
as the expected signal fraction of 39% is in fact smaller than the background uncertainty , a simple counting experiment method is impossible and multivariate techniques are needed to extract the signal .
three analysis methods named boosted decision trees ( bdt ) , bayesian neural - network ( bnn ) , matrix element ( me ) giving consistent results were employed and used to produce a combined discriminant ( see figure [ fig : d0_singletop_2 ] ) . the result based on @xmath45 data collected by the d detector
is shown in table [ table : singletop_individual ] .
being 5060% correlated , combining the individual results leads to an improved significance .
the combined cross - section measurement is then @xmath46 one can also search new phenomena in the same final state , e.g. for charged higgs bosons decaying to top and bottom quarks in @xmath49 collisions @xcite .
limits on the charged higgs mass a function of @xmath50 were set based on a discriminating variable of the jet - jet-@xmath4 invariant mass ( figure [ fig : d0_singletop_4 ] ) .
single top production also provides a direct access to the properties of the @xmath1 vertex , allowing a search for anomalous top quark couplings @xcite .
the sm lagrangian allows only the @xmath51 vertex structure , but a more general form can be probed : @xmath52 where sm corresponds to the case of @xmath53 , @xmath54 . using the @xmath4 helicity measurement in the @xmath55jet channel ( which constrains form factors ratios ) for probability density priors , the extracted bayesian limits on the vector and axial vector form factors are @xmath56 , @xmath57 and @xmath58 assuming @xmath53 .
|
top quark heaviest elementary particle discovered fermilab 1995 current run ii tevatron accelerator growing statistics study kinematic properties top pair production electroweak production top quarks latest results @xmath0 cross sections measurements interpretation limits new physics summarise current single top quark production measurements @xmath1 vertex properties top quark first observed @xmath0 pairs strong interaction pair production test perturbative quantum chromodynamics decaying system properties electroweak laboratory new physics tevatron production @xmath2 annihilation 85% ) @xmath3 fusion 15% ) final states @xmath0 system determined by leptonic hadronic mixed decays modes @xmath4-bosons dilepton @xmath5 ) final state low background low branching fraction @xmath6jet channels larger branching fraction more background one escaping neutrino hadronic channel largest branching ratio overwhelming background qcd multijet production @xmath9jets analyses challenged @xmath10 lepton identification provide information testing new models couplings @xmath10cross - section analysis @xmath6jets divided into bins jet multiplicity @xmath11 + 1,2 jets control sample 3 @xmath12 jet bins larger signal fraction for measurement required one jet @xmath13-jet-tagger one isolated lepton missing transverse energy leading jet @xmath14 @xmath15gev standard model backgrounds modelled using alpgen+pythia parton shower nlo scale factors largest physics background from @xmath16jets events other backgrounds diboson single top production no reliable model multijet production multijet background from special data inverted cut lepton isolation signal fraction grows with @xmath13-tagged jets kinematic likelihood discriminant variables employed @xmath0 fraction cross - section cross - section measurements @xmath6jets channels combined 14 orthogonal channels combined cross - section fitted likelihood function poisson terms signal background yields systematic uncertainties included gaussian probability density function combined result is @xmath18 assuming @xmath19 @xcite systematic uncertainties dominate errorprovide ratios cross - sections between channels @xmath20 cancel results @xmath21 @xmath22 consistent with sm value 1 shown in figure xsect_combi_d0_cdf cross - section ratios set upper limits @xmath23 branching ratio @xmath24 enhancement @xmath10 channel @xmath25 leptophobic @xmath26 enhancement @xmath6jets channel @xmath27 extracted expected observed upper limits figure ttbar_h_limits using pseudo - experiments data current tevatron @xmath28 measurement precise to @xmath29gev @xcite triggering discussions definition top mass complementary information @xmath28 extracted from @xmath30 dependence different @xmath31 measured @xmath0 cross - section compared to nlo calculations @xmath28 definition pole mass extracted values @xmath28 range @xmath32 to @xmath33gev theory errors @xmath34gev with world - average @xmath35gev @xcite figure mass_from_xsect electroweak single ) top quark production remaining sm observed recently evidences single top production tevatron collider experiments 2007 2008process larger background smaller cross - section @xmath0 production observation single top production access to @xmath1 vertex properties window new physics two production modes @xmath36 @xmath37-channels requirements single top include events with one isolated lepton two jets with @xmath38gev missing transverse energy @xmath39-signature ) @xmath40gev in two - jet @xmath41 bin jets originate from @xmath13-hadrons secondary vertex information neural net @xmath13-tagger selecting 4,519 @xmath13-tagged events expect @xmath42 single top events signal acceptances 3.7% ( 2.5% ) for @xmath43 ( @xmath44 ) expected signal fraction 39% smaller than background uncertainty simple counting experiment impossible multivariate techniques needed extract signal three analysis methods boosted decision trees bayesian neural - network matrix element consistent results combined discriminant result @xmath45 data shown in table 5060% correlated combining results improved significance combined cross - section measurement is @xmath46 search new phenomena final state charged higgs bosons quarks in @xmath49 collisionslimits charged higgs mass @xmath50 set jet-@xmath4 invariant mass_singletop_4 single top production access properties @xmath1 vertex search anomalous top quark couplings sm lagrangian allows @xmath51 vertex structure general form probed @xmath52 sm corresponds @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath4 helicity measurement @xmath55jet channel constrains form factors ratios probability bayesian limits vector form factors @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath53
| 0.314062
| 1,879
| 1,005
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,460
|
we compare the light extinction spectra of elongated gold nanoparticles with different shapes ( cylinder , spherocylinder and ellipsoid ) and sizes of 10 to 100 nm . we argue that the equivalence of the various moments of mass distribution is the natural comparison criterion rather than the length - to - diameter ( aspect ) ratio generally used in the literature and that it leads to better spectral correspondence between the various shapes .
|
over the last two decades , the striking optical properties of noble metal nanoparticles have raised considerable interest . among the variety of morphologies obtainable by chemical synthesis , `` nanorods '' ( elongated cylindrical or , more commonly , spherocylindrical particles ) are some of the most studied , due to their strong longitudinal resonance , which can be tuned by varying their anisotropy .
silver and gold nanorods were thoroughly studied by uv - vis - ir spectroscopy .
although numerical simulation techniques are nowadays quite accessible , see e.g. refs .
, these particles are often modeled as ellipsoids @xcite , since this shape has the great advantage of being amenable to analytical treatment , as briefly discussed in the following ; see @xcite for a detailed and up - to - date discussion .
the scattering problem was solved exactly for a sphere @xcite and for an arbitrary spheroid @xcite , but the expressions are cumbersome . in the rayleigh ( or electrostatic )
limit , analytical approximations can be derived for ellipsoids @xcite .
they are valid for particles much smaller than the wavelength , a condition often fulfilled in practice .
more elaborate but still tractable approximations exist , for spheres @xcite and spheroids @xcite beyond the rayleigh regime .
unfortunately , the currently prevailing opinion @xcite is that the ellipsoid model does not accurately describe more realistic shapes , in particular with respect to the longitudinal plasmon resonance ( that associated to the longest dimension ) .
the authors reach this conclusion by comparing the position of the longitudinal plasmon peak ( lpp ) for cylinders , spherocylinders , and prolate spheroids with the same length @xmath0 and transverse diameter @xmath1 and hence the same aspect ratio @xmath2 .
however , the literature provides no justification for using @xmath3 as the comparison parameter .
we consider the relevant criterion for identifying the ellipsoid corresponding to a given particle .
in contrast with the established procedure discussed above , we argue that the relevant quantities are the various moments of the mass distribution , leading to an effective aspect ratio @xmath4 .
the spectra of particles with different shapes : cylinder , spherocylinder and ellipsoid and the same @xmath4 agree much better than those for an equal aspect ratio @xmath3 .
the most general description of a mass distribution , for a body or a system of particles ) , is in terms of its various moments @xcite .
the first of these are , in increasing tensorial order , @xmath5 ( the total mass of the system ) , @xmath6 ( with @xmath7 the center - of - mass vector ) and the inertia tensor : @xmath8\ ] ] where @xmath9 is the volume of the body , @xmath10 is the local mass density , @xmath11 is the unit tensor and @xmath12 denotes the outer product .
@xmath13 is widely used in mechanics , but is also relevant for the interaction of particles with radiation : for instance , the gyration radius @xmath14 defined as @xmath15 is extensively used in small - angle scattering techniques @xcite . this strategy is also very similar to the traditional way of describing a charge distribution by its total charge , dipole , quadrupole and higher multipolar moments . in this framework ,
the ellipsoid equivalent to a given body is the one with the same distribution moments .
geometrically , an ellipsoid is completely defined by three parameters ( e.g. the semi - axes ) chosen such that the three eigenvalues of @xmath13 are the same as those of the initial body .
the particle position @xmath7 does not influence the absorbance ; as to the mass , we will return to it in appendix [ sec : appmass ] .
three nanoparticles ( from top to bottom : cylinder , spherocylinder and prolate ellipsoid ) with the same total length @xmath16 and diameter @xmath17 , and thus the same aspect ratio @xmath18 . for the top two shapes
, the superimposed contour represents the equivalent ellipsoid ( see text).,scaledwidth=45.0% ] we studied three types of particles : cylinders , spherocylinders and prolate ellipsoids , described by their aspect ratio @xmath19 ( exemplified in figure [ fig : geom ] for @xmath20 . ) and considered homogeneous : @xmath21 . for ellipsoids , one can also write @xmath22 ( the ratio of the two semi - axes ) .
all these shapes have azimuthal symmetry around their length , taken as parallel to @xmath23 , so that only @xmath24 and @xmath25 need to be determined .
@xmath26 @xmath27 \right . \\ & + \left
. \dfrac{4}{3 } \left [ \dfrac{83}{320 } + \left ( r - 1 + \dfrac{3}{8}\right ) ^2 \right ] \right \rbrace\\ i_z & = \rho \pi r^5 \left [ ( r-1 ) + \dfrac{8}{15}\right ] \end{array } \right.\ , \text{spherocylinder}\\ \label{eq : isphcyl}\ ] ] @xmath28 [ eq : iall ] where @xmath29 and @xmath30 are the masses of the cylinder and ellipsoid , respectively . for the spherocylinder ,
the moments of inertia are not easily expressed as a function of the total mass of the object and are therefore given in terms of the geometrical parameters and of the mass density @xmath31 .
for a given cylinder or spherocylinder we determine @xmath32 and @xmath33 as a function of @xmath34 and @xmath3 from or and identify them with , yielding the semi - axes of the equivalent ellipsoid @xmath35 and @xmath36 or , equivalently , @xmath37 and @xmath38 .
it is easily checked that @xmath4 does not depend on the radius @xmath34 : @xmath39 where @xmath40 .
we performed numerical simulations of the extinction cross - section @xmath41 of anisotropic gold nanoparticles using the discrete dipole approximation ( dda ) code ddscat 7.3 @xcite with the filtered coupled dipole method @xcite .
the refractive index of bulk gold @xmath42 is that given by johnson & christy @xcite , with no corrections for boundary dissipation . the ambient medium is water , described by a constant refractive index @xmath43 .
the particles are discretized using 90 dipoles along the diameter and @xmath44 along the length , where @xmath3 goes from 1 to 8 .
the particle radius is 5 nm .
the electric field is parallel to the long axis of the particles ( along @xmath23 ) in order to probe the lpp . in the transverse configuration ( electric field perpendicular to @xmath23 )
, the spectrum changes very little with the aspect ratio @xcite . for randomly oriented particles , e.g. in colloidal solution ,
the overall spectrum is a superposition of the longitudinal and transverse components , so that a satisfactory description of the longitudinal spectrum ensures that the total spectrum is also correctly described . to extend the results to larger particle sizes ( 10 and 20 nm radii ) we performed additional simulations using the boundary element method ( bem ) @xcite as implemented by the matlab package mnpbem @xcite .
the two methods yield very similar results , as shown in appendix [ sec : ddabem ] .
we fitted the extinction spectrum with the sum of a lorentzian peak and a cubic background to determine the position of the lpp , plotted in figure [ fig : simul ] for the three shapes , as a function of @xmath3 ( left panel ) and @xmath45 ( right panel ) .
as reference , we also added the lpp position for ellipsoids in the rayleigh limit , using the gans formula ( ref . , eq .
( 5.32 ) ) . as @xmath3 increases , so does the difference in lpp position between different shapes . when plotted against @xmath45 , however , the lpp values are much closer together and the variation is non - monotonic .
the tendency also holds for larger particles , as shown in figure [ fig : r10r20 ] for radii of 10 and 20 nm . for clarity ,
only the differences with respect to the rayleigh limit are shown , corresponding to the bottom of figure [ fig : simul ] .
the peak positions for the spherocylinder and ellipsoid are remarkably close together , while those of the cylinder exhibit a red shift which is increasingly pronounced with the aspect ratio and the radius .
this is probably due to field concentration at the sharp edges of the cylindrical particles , a localized effect that can not be captured by our simplified model .
we also checked our model against the experimental data measured for gold nanorods with varying aspect ratio in ref . .
the mean aspect ratio @xmath3 and its standard deviation @xmath46 are determined via tem and are shown in figure [ fig : ar ] as grey bars versus the sample code .
the uv - vis - ir spectroscopy curves are fitted with an ellipsoid model , yielding the distribution of _ effective _ aspect ratio .
its mean @xmath4 and standard deviation @xmath47 are shown as solid diamonds with error bars . if our model is correct , the @xmath3 values ( open dots ) obtained from the experimental @xmath4 distribution by inverting the middle relation in eq .
are the true geometrical ones and should coincide with the tem results . for most samples
this is indeed the case , confirming the improvement .
one should however keep in mind that tem only samples a very small fraction of the particles ( those deposited on grids and , among these , only those visible in the images ) in contrast with uv - vis - ir spectroscopy , which averages over all particles contained in a few milliliters of solution .
the latter technique should therefore be much more representative of the complete particle distribution .
determined by transmission electron microscopy ( tem ) ( grey bars ) and effective aspect ratio @xmath4 measured by uv - vis - ir spectroscopy ( solid diamonds ) . the geometric aspect ratio for spherocylinders @xmath3 ( open dots )
is then extracted from @xmath4 by inverting eq . .
the error bars ( uv - vis - ir ) and bar height ( tem ) indicate the mean @xmath48 standard deviation : @xmath49 or @xmath50 .
based on figure 5 of ref .
.[fig : ar],scaledwidth=45.0% ]
for ellipsoids in the rayleigh approximation , the lpp is completely described by a geometrical factor @xmath51 .
one can then define an equivalent ellipsoid of a particle by fitting its simulated spectrum with the mie - gans formula and finding the corresponding @xmath51 @xcite .
our approach here is completely different : we find the equivalent ellipsoid of the particle by applying very general principles to its mass distribution and without any consideration of its electrostatic or optical properties .
we conclude that the lpp positions of particles with the same moments of inertia ( defined in ) are significantly closer than for particles with the same aspect ratio @xmath3 . in conclusion ,
when the mass distribution is properly taken into account , the effective ellipsoid approximation describes fairly well the optical properties of elongated gold nanoparticles , in particular those of spherocylinders .
we therefore expect the results can be generalized to other rounded particles ( e.g. dumbbells @xcite ) but probably not to those exhibiting edges or tips ( e.g. prisms @xcite ) , where the field concentration is significant
. it would also be interesting to study the influence of faceting , observed in certain nanorods@xcite , on their optical spectra . combining this correction with an approximate analytical relation for the response of ellipsoids @xcite and accounting for the polydispersity in aspect ratio @xcite should yield a quantitatively accurate model for the experimental extinction spectra .
the three moments of inertia @xmath52 and @xmath33 completely define the equivalent ellipsoid for a given particle , including its volume @xmath53 and hence its mass @xmath54 . in figure [
fig : volume ] we show the ratio of @xmath53 to the volume @xmath9 of the target particle , for the cylinder and spherocylinder and for aspect ratios from 1 to 8 . for reference , we also show the same ratio for ellipsoids having the same aspect ratio @xmath3 as the target particle .
ratio of the volume @xmath53 of the equivalent ellipsoid to the volume @xmath9 of the target particle ( cylinder or spherocylinder ) , based on identifying the moments of inertia ( dotted line ) or by using the same aspect ratio ( solid line ) , compared to the exact value of 1 ( dashed line).,scaledwidth=45.0% ] clearly , the volumes are much closer when the corresponding ellipsoid is chosen based on the moments of inertia ( the discrepancy is below 3 % ) than based on the aspect ratio ( where the discrepancy can reach 33 % ) .
this result is noteworthy on two counts : first , because it comforts our choice of the moments of inertia as relevant parameters and second because the volume must be correctly described for practical applications , e.g. when estimating the particle concentration in solution from the extinction spectrum .
the dda method is more time - consuming , so we only used it for the smaller particles ( 5 nm in radius ) and employed the bem technique for the larger objects . to make sure that the results are compatible
, we also ran the bem simulations for the small particles , with the results shown in figure [ fig : ddabem ] .
|
last two decades optical properties of noble metal nanoparticles raised interest morphologies chemical synthesis nanorods ( elongated spherocylindrical particles most studied due to strong longitudinal resonance tuned by varying anisotropy silver gold nanorods studied by uv - vis - ir spectroscopy numerical simulation techniques accessible particles often modeled as ellipsoids @xcite shape amenable to analytical treatment scattering problem solved for sphere @xcite arbitrary spheroid @xcite expressions cumbersome in rayleigh limit analytical approximations can derived for ellipsoids @xcite valid for particles smaller than wavelength elaborate tractable approximations exist for spheres spheroids beyond rayleigh regime prevailing opinion ellipsoid model describe realistic shapes longitudinal plasmon resonance longest dimension authors conclusion comparing position of longitudinal plasmon peak ) for cylinders spherocylinders prolate spheroids with same length @xmath0 transverse diameter @xmath1 aspect ratio @xmath2 literature provides no justification for using @xmath3 as comparison parameterconsider relevant criterion identifying ellipsoid particle contrast procedure argue relevant quantities are various moments mass distribution effective aspect ratio @xmath4 spectra of particles with different shapes cylinder spherocylinder ellipsoid same @xmath4 agree better than equal aspect ratio @xmath3 general description mass distribution various moments @xcite first are @xmath5 total mass @xmath6 @xmath7 center - of - mass vector inertia tensor @xmath8 @xmath9 is volume body @xmath10 local mass density @xmath11 unit tensor @xmath12 outer product @xmath13 used in mechanics relevant for interaction particles with radiation gyration radius @xmath14 @xmath15 used in small - angle scattering techniques strategy similar to traditional describing charge distribution by total charge dipole quadrupole higher multipolar moments ellipsoid equivalent to body is with same distribution moments ellipsoid defined by three parameters semi - axes three eigenvalues of @xmath13 same as initial body particle position @xmath7 influence absorbance mass return in appendixthree nanoparticles to cylinder spherocylinder prolate ellipsoid same length @xmath16 diameter @xmath17 same aspect ratio @xmath18 top two shapes superimposed contour represents equivalent ellipsoid,scaledwidth=45.0% studied three types of particles cylinders spherocylinders prolate ellipsoids described aspect ratio @xmath19 exemplified figure @xmath20 homogeneous @xmath21 ellipsoids write @xmath22 ( ratio of two semi - axes shapes azimuthal symmetry around length parallel to @xmath23 only @xmath24 @xmath25 determined @xmath26 @xmath27 \right\left\dfrac{4}{3 } \left\dfrac{83}{320 }\dfrac{3}{8}\right\dfrac{8}{15}\right{array{spherocylinder{eq : isphcyl} @xmath28 eq : iall @xmath29 @xmath30 masses of cylinder ellipsoid spherocylinder moments of inertia not expressed function total mass given in geometrical parameters mass density @xmath31 cylinder determine @xmath32 @xmath33 function of @xmath34 @xmath3 yielding semi - axes equivalent ellipsoid @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath4 depend on radius @xmath34 @xmath39 @xmath40 performed simulations extinction cross - section @xmath41 anisotropic gold nanoparticles discrete dipole approximation code ddscat 7.3 @xcite filtered coupled dipole method refractive index bulk gold @xmath42 johnson & christy @xcite no corrections boundary dissipation ambient medium water constant refractive index @xmath43 particles discretized 90 dipoles diameter @xmath44 length @xmath3 1 to 8 particle radius 5 nm electric field parallel to long axis particles @xmath23 transverse configuration spectrum changes little with aspect ratio randomly oriented particles colloidal solution overall spectrum superposition longitudinal transverse components spectrum results larger particle sizes 10 20 nm radii performed additional simulations boundary element method @xcite implemented matlab package mnpbem methods yield similar results shown appendix [ ddabemfitted extinction spectrum with lorentzian peak cubic background position lpp plotted in figure for three shapes function of @xmath3 @xmath45 added lpp position for ellipsoids in rayleigh limit using gans formula @xmath3 increases difference in lpp position between shapes plotted against @xmath45 lpp values closer together variation non - monotonic tendency holds for larger particles in figure for radii 10 20 nm differences rayleigh limit shown peak positions for spherocylinder ellipsoid close cylinder red shift pronounced with aspect ratio radius due to field concentration at sharp edges cylindrical particles model checked model against experimental data for gold nanorods with varying aspect ratio mean aspect ratio @xmath3 standard deviation @xmath46 determined via tem shown in figure as grey bars versus sample code uv - vis - ir spectroscopy curves fitted with ellipsoid model distribution of effective aspect ratio mean @xmath4 standard deviation @xmath47 as solid diamonds with error bars if model correct @xmath3 values obtained from experimental @xmath4 distribution by inverting middle relation intrue geometrical ones coincide with tem results most samples confirming improvement tem samples small fraction particles grids visible in images contrast with uv - vis - ir spectroscopy averages particles in milliliters solution latter technique representative of complete particle distribution determined by transmission electron microscopy tem grey bars effective aspect ratio @xmath4 uv - vis - ir spectroscopy geometric aspect ratio for spherocylinders @xmath3 extracted from @xmath4 by inverting eq error bars bar height tem indicate mean @xmath48 standard deviation : @xmath49 or @xmath50 figure 5 ellipsoids in rayleigh approximation lpp described by geometrical factor @xmath51 define equivalent ellipsoid by fitting simulated spectrum with mie - gans formula finding corresponding @xmath51 approach different find equivalent ellipsoid general principles mass distribution without electrostatic optical properties lpp positions of particles with same moments of inertia closer than same aspect ratio @xmath3 mass distribution effective ellipsoid approximation describes optical properties of elongated gold nanoparticles spherocylinders results generalized to other rounded particlesdumbbells @xcite not edges tips prisms @xcite field concentration significant study influence faceting nanorods@xcite on optical spectra correction with analytical relation for response ellipsoids @xcite polydispersity in aspect ratio accurate model for experimental extinction spectra three moments of inertia @xmath52 @xmath33 define equivalent ellipsoid particle including volume @xmath53 mass @xmath54 figure ratio of @xmath53 to volume @xmath9 target particle for cylinder spherocylinder aspect ratios 1 to 8 same ratio for ellipsoids same aspect ratio @xmath3 target particle ratio volume @xmath53 equivalent ellipsoid to volume @xmath9 target particle based moments of inertia or same aspect ratio compared to exact value of 1.0% volumes closer when ellipsoid chosen based on moments of inertia discrepancy below 3 % than aspect ratio discrepancy 33 % ) result noteworthy comforts choice of moments of inertia relevant parameters volume described for practical applications estimating particle concentration solution extinction spectrumdda method time - consuming used smaller particles ( 5 nm radius ) employed bem technique larger objects results compatible ran bem simulations small particles results shown figure ddabem ]
| 0.500941
| 2,995
| 1,536
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,461
|
in the present paper we study two - dimensional maximal surfaces with harmonic level - sets . as a corollary
we obtain a new class of one - periodic maximal surfaces .
|
let @xmath0 be @xmath1-dimensional minkowski space with the standard metric @xmath2 where @xmath3 is a point in @xmath0 .
let @xmath4 be a surface in @xmath0 given by @xmath5 , and @xmath6 be a function in a domain @xmath7 .
we shall assume that @xmath6 is @xmath8-smooth everywhere in @xmath9 except for a set @xmath10 consisting of isolated points only . a surface @xmath4 is _ space - like _ if the induced from @xmath11 metric is the positive definite metric .
this is equivalent to the following inequality @xmath12 where the lower index denotes a partial derivative with respect to the corresponding variable : @xmath13 , and @xmath14 .
a space - like surface @xmath4 is called _ maximal _ if the following equality holds @xmath15 everywhere in @xmath16 .
then it is well - known that ( [ first ] ) is equivalent to the vanishing of the mean curvature of @xmath4 ( with respect to its embedding in the minkowski space @xmath11 ) .
cheng and yau in @xcite proved that for every entire maximal surface @xmath4 ( i.e. the surface to be defined over the whole @xmath17 ) satisfies the bernstein property . in other words ,
an entire solution @xmath18 to ( [ second])-([first ] ) is always an affine function . on the other hand , the study of _ almost - entire _ solutions to ( [ second])-([first ] ) , i.e. solutions that they are of @xmath8 outside of a non - empty descrete set @xmath19 , is of great interest
really , there are a lot of connections between this theory and the modern physics ( see @xcite ) .
the first break - through in this direction was due to ecker @xcite , who established that the rotationally symmetric maximal surfaces ( ` maximal catenoids ' ) @xmath20 are only almost - entire solutions with @xmath19 consisting of the origin .
moreover , in the same paper it was proved that every isolated singular point of a maximal ( not necessarily entire ) surface behaves as a light cone .
namely , let @xmath21 be an isolated singular point of a solution @xmath6 which is defined at a neighborhood of @xmath22 then @xmath6 can be extended continuously at @xmath22 and @xmath23 an important characteristic of a singular point is the flux of the solution which is defined as @xmath24 where the integral is taken over a closed surface @xmath25 which encloses @xmath22 and contains no singular points , and @xmath26 denotes the outward unit normal to @xmath27 .
it follows from ( [ first ] ) that integral ( [ fourth ] ) is independent on a choice of @xmath27 .
it was shown in @xcite that @xmath28 is a lorentzian invariant of @xmath4 .
it is not hard to prove that a point @xmath29 is an essential singularity of the solution @xmath6 if and only if @xmath30 @xcite . in recent papers @xcite ,
@xcite the asymptotic behaviour and the existence questions for solutions to ( [ second])-([first ] ) were studied . in
particularly , it was shown in @xcite that under some natural geometrical assumptions on the finite set @xmath19 there exists a unique almost - entire solution @xmath6 with the prescribed fluxes @xmath31 , @xmath32 , where @xmath19 is the singular set of the solution .
on the other hand , there are no explicit examples except for the mentioned above `` maximal catenoids '' ( [ third ] ) even in the two - dimensional case . in this paper
we construct a one - parametric family of periodic almost - entire maximal surfaces whose singular set is discrete ( consists of isolated points ) and located on the fixed line .
these examples are based on the following general assertion which completely characterizes all maximal surfaces with harmonic level - sets .
let @xmath33 satisfy ( [ second])-([first ] ) and let @xmath34 , where @xmath35 is a harmonic function .
then @xmath35 is a real part of the holomorphic function @xmath36 , where @xmath37 is one of the following \(i ) @xmath38 ; \(ii ) @xmath39 ; \(iii ) @xmath40 . + here @xmath41 and @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 . the cases ( i ) and ( ii ) lead us to the well - known examples : the plane , the rotational surface , the helicoid and sherk s maximal surfaces .
in the case ( iii ) the surface is space - like only if @xmath45 , moreover in that case it has infinitely many isolated singularity points . the explicit expression and analysis we shall give in the remained part of the paper . in fact , the examples of one - periodic maximal surfaces constructed in this paper are a small part of a bigger family of double- and one - periodic maximal two - dimensional surfaces which we treat in the forthcoming paper @xcite .
let @xmath46 be a @xmath8-function such that @xmath47 and @xmath48 then the graph of @xmath46 is a maximal surface in @xmath49 .
now we consider the function @xmath46 such that @xmath50 , where @xmath51 and @xmath52 are some twice - differentiable functions .
then ( [ ur1 ] ) can be brought to the following form : @xmath53 where @xmath54 , @xmath55 , @xmath56 .
let @xmath57 , @xmath37 be holomorphic functions , @xmath41 .
then the following identities take place @xmath58 @xmath59 here @xmath60 denotes the conjugate to @xmath61 function .
[ lemm1 ] the cauchi - riemann conditions imply @xmath62 @xmath63 we prove the validity of the first equality only : @xmath64 the second equality can be proved by the same way , hence the lemma is proved completely .
let @xmath65 , @xmath41 , where @xmath66 is a holomorphic function in the domain @xmath67 .
in order to find the coefficients @xmath19 , @xmath68 and @xmath69 of equation ( [ ur2 ] ) , from ( [ koshi ] ) we notice @xmath70 @xmath71 then @xmath72 and the equation ( [ ur2 ] ) becomes @xmath73 setting @xmath74 we find that @xmath75 the term @xmath76 in the equation ( [ chast1 ] ) depends only on @xmath65 if and only if @xmath77 where @xmath78 is a real constant .
[ lemm2 ] let @xmath79 .
we show that the condition of the functional dependence @xmath80 is equivalent to @xmath81 , @xmath82 . indeed , by virtue of ( [ koshi ] ) @xmath83 , @xmath84 and ( [ l1 ] )
, we have @xmath85 then @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88 and , finally , @xmath89 simplifying the last expression yields @xmath90 the latter identity holds in a non - empty domain @xmath67 , hence by the uniqueness theorem for analitic functions , there exists a real constant @xmath78 such that @xmath81 . the lemma is proved .
now we consider the differential equation ( [ mmm ] ) with a holomorphic in some domain @xmath67 function @xmath37 . one can easily show that the set of solutions of this equation makes up the following functional family : ( a ) @xmath38 ; ( b ) @xmath39 ; ( c ) @xmath91 , @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath92 .
now we consider the last case , when @xmath93 . here
we have @xmath94 and , hence , @xmath95 without loss of generality , we may assume that the constant in the right hand side of the last equality is identically zero .
then @xmath96 and @xmath97 on the other hand , @xmath98 then the equation ( [ chast1 ] ) takes the form @xmath99 by solving the ordinary differential equation we arrive at @xmath100 and @xmath101 to find the admissible values of the parameter @xmath102
which correspond to the space - like examples , we check when the inequality @xmath103 holds . for this purpose
we write @xmath104 and by using a new variable @xmath105 , we obtain @xmath106 we denote @xmath113 and assume without loss of generality that @xmath114
. then @xmath115 @xmath116 where @xmath117 and @xmath118 .
let us introduce @xmath119 .
then @xmath120 i.e. by means of the jacobi elliptic sinus , we find @xmath121 let @xmath124 and @xmath125 .
then the surface @xmath126 given implicitly by @xmath127 is a maximal surface in @xmath128 .
moreover , this surface is a graph of a real analytic function everywhere except for the set consisting of singular points @xmath129 we observe that for different values of @xmath130 , the surfaces @xmath126 are lorentz non - isometric .
one can also see that @xmath126 is located in the parallel slab @xmath131 , where @xmath132 is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind ( the least positive solution of equation @xmath133 ) .
moreover , one can show that the flux @xmath134 at the singular point @xmath135 is equal to @xmath136
|
@xmath0 minkowski space standard metric @xmath2 @xmath3 point in @xmath0 @xmath4 surface in @xmath0 @xmath5 @xmath6 function in domain @xmath7 @xmath6 @xmath8-smooth @xmath9 except @xmath10 isolated points surface @xmath4 space - like if induced from @xmath11 metric positive definite metric equivalent to inequality @xmath12 lower index partial derivative variable @xmath13 @xmath14 space - like surface @xmath4 maximal _ if equality holds @xmath15 in @xmath16 first ) equivalent to vanishing mean curvature of @xmath4 embedding minkowski space @xmath11 cheng yau entire maximal surface @xmath4 satisfies bernstein property entire solution @xmath18 to second])-([first ] ) affine function study of almost - entire solutions to second])-([first ] ) @xmath8 outside non - empty descrete set @xmath19 interest connections between theory modern physics @xcite first break - through ecker @xcite rotationally symmetric maximal surfaces @xmath20 almost - entire solutions with @xmath19 originpaper proved isolated point of surface behaves as light cone @xmath21 be isolated singular point solution @xmath6 defined neighborhood @xmath22 extended at @xmath22 @xmath23 characteristic singular point is flux solution defined as @xmath24 integral over closed surface @xmath25 encloses @xmath22 contains no singular points @xmath26 outward unit normal to @xmath27 integral independent on choice @xmath27 @xmath28 is lorentzian invariant of @xmath4 point @xmath29 essential singularity of solution @xmath6 if @xmath30 @xcite recent papers asymptotic behaviour existence questions for solutions studied shown under natural geometrical assumptions on finite set @xmath19 unique almost - entire solution @xmath6 with fluxes @xmath31 , @xmath32 @xmath19 is singular set solution no explicit examples except maximal catenoids two - dimensional case paper one - parametric family of periodic almost - entire maximal surfaces singular set discrete isolated on fixed line examples based on assertion characterizes maximal surfaces with harmonic level - sets@xmath33 satisfy second[first ) @xmath34 @xmath35 harmonic function @xmath35 part holomorphic function @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 cases ( i ) ii ) examples plane rotational surface helicoid sherk s maximal surfaces case ( iii ) surface space - like @xmath45 infinitely many isolated singularity points explicit expression analysis remained part paper examples one - periodic maximal surfaces small part family double- one - periodic maximal two - surfaces forthcoming paper @xmath46 @xmath8-function @xmath47 @xmath48 graph @xmath46 maximal surface @xmath49 consider function @xmath46 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 twice - differentiable functions ur1 form @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath37 holomorphic functions @xmath41 identities @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 conjugate @xmath61 functioncauchi - riemann conditions imply @xmath62 @xmath63 prove validity first equality @xmath64 second equality proved same way lemma proved completely @xmath65 @xmath41 @xmath66 holomorphic function domain @xmath67 find coefficients @xmath19 @xmath68 @xmath69 equation notice @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 equation becomes @xmath73 setting @xmath74 @xmath75 term @xmath76 equation depends on @xmath65 if @xmath77 @xmath78 real constant @xmath79 condition functional dependence @xmath80 equivalent to @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 last expression yields @xmath90 latter identity holds non - empty domain @xmath67 uniqueness theorem for analitic functions exists real constant @xmath78 @xmath81 lemma proved consider differential equation ( ) holomorphic domain @xmath67 function @xmath37 set solutions equation functional family : @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath91 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath92consider last case @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath95 loss generality assume constant right side last equality zero @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 equation form @xmath99 solving ordinary differential equation arrive @xmath100 @xmath101 find admissible values parameter @xmath102 space - like examples check inequality @xmath103 holds write @xmath104 new variable @xmath105 obtain @xmath106 denote @xmath113 assume loss generality @xmath114 @xmath115 @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath118 introduce @xmath119 @xmath120 jacobi elliptic sinus find @xmath121 @xmath124 @xmath125 surface @xmath126 @xmath127 maximal surface @xmath128 surface graph analytic function set singular points @xmath129 different values @xmath130 surfaces @xmath126 non - isometric @xmath126 parallel slab @xmath131 @xmath132 complete elliptic integral first kind least positive solution equation @xmath133 flux @xmath134 singular point @xmath135 equal @xmath136
| 0.315614
| 2,160
| 1,187
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,477
|
we report the first results of an ongoing survey at 22ghz with the 100-m effelsberg telescope to search for water maser emission in bright iras sources .
we have detected water vapor emission in ic 342 .
the maser , associated with a star forming region @xmath01015 west of the nucleus , consists of a single 0.5kms@xmath1 wide feature and reaches an isotropic luminosity of 10@xmath2l@xmath3 ( @xmath4=1.8mpc ) .
our detection raises the detection rate among northern galaxies with iras point source fluxes @xmath5 @xmath6 50jy to 16% .
.5 cm
|
to date , luminous extragalactic h@xmath7o masers can be grouped into three classes : those tracing accretion disks ( e.g. ngc 4258 ) ; those in which the emission is either the result of an interaction between the radio jet and an encroaching molecular cloud or an accidental overlap , along the line - of - sight , between a warm dense molecular cloud and the radio continuum of the jet ( e.g. ngc 1052 and mrk 348 ) ; those related to prominent sites of star formation , such as the ones observed in m 33 ( the earliest known extragalactic h@xmath7o masers ) , and later also in ic 10 .
extragalactic h@xmath7o masers are preferentially detected in nearby galaxies that are bright in the infrared ( @xcite ) .
while nuclear masers are of obvious interest , non - nuclear masers are also important for a number of reasons : these sources allow us to pinpoint sites of massive star formation , to measure the velocity vectors of these regions through vlbi proper motion studies , and to determine true distances through complementary measurements of proper motion and radial velocity ( e.g. @xcite ) .
we have therefore observed the nearby spiral galaxies ic 342 and maffei 2 , both of which exhibit prominent nuclear bars and strong molecular , infrared , and radio continuum emission . in the following we report the results of our observations .
the @xmath8 line of h@xmath7o ( rest frequency : 22.23508ghz ) was observed with the 100-m telescope of the mpifr at effelsberg toward maffei 2 and ic 342 .
the full width to half power beamwidth was 40 .
the observations were carried out in a dual beam switching mode with a beam throw of 2 and a switching frequency of @xmath01hz .
the pointing accuracy was always better than 10 . on may 12 , 2001 , ic 342
was observed with the very large array ( vla ) in its b configuration .
the 103 channels used , out of the 128 observed , cover a range in velocity of @xmath08kms@xmath1 centered at 16kms@xmath1 lsr ( the velocity of the line detected at effelsberg ) .
no continuum subtraction was needed .
the data were deconvolved using the clean algorithm ( @xcite ) .
the restoring beam is @xmath9 and the rms noise per channel is @xmath010mjy , consistent with the expected thermal noise .
our single - dish observations towards maffei 2 yielded no detection , with a 5@xmath10 upper limit of 25mjy ( channel spacing : 1.05kms@xmath1 ; velocity range : 250kms@xmath1 @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath11 + 230kms@xmath1 ; epoch : apr 3 , 2001 ; position : @xmath13 = 02@xmath14 41@xmath15 55@xmath162 , @xmath17 = + 59@xmath18 36@xmath19 11@xmath20 ) . o maser feature observed with high velocity resolution ( channel spacings after smoothing four contiguous channels are 0.26kms@xmath1 ) on * a ) * april 3 , * b ) * april 22 , * c ) * may 7 , and * d ) * june 22 .
the first spectrum has been taken at the ( 0,0 ) position , the others at ( 10,0 ) relative to the position given in footnote ` a ' of table 1 .
the dashed line indicates @xmath21 = 16kms@xmath1 .
[ flare],width=302 ] o spectra obtained toward the central region of ic 342 .
positions are offsets relative to and .
note that the spacing between two individual spectra ( 20 ) is approximately half of the size of the 100-m effelsberg telescope beam at 22ghz ( 40 ) . averaging four contiguous channels ,
the spectra have been smoothed to a spacing of 0.26 kms@xmath1 .
[ map],width=453 ] on april 2 , 2001 , we obtained the first definite detection of water vapor emission in ic 342 . during the next night
the detection was confirmed with a velocity resolution sufficient to resolve the line profile ( fig.[flare]a ) .
the detected feature lies at @xmath21 = 16kms@xmath1 and has a linewidth of @xmath00.5kms@xmath1 ; on april 2 , no other component was seen at velocities 175kms@xmath1 @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath11 + 310kms@xmath1 ( channel spacing : 1.05kms@xmath1 ; 5@xmath10 noise level : 16mjy ) . a high line intensity ( @xmath0100mjy ) and good weather conditions allowed us to map the emitting region ( fig.[map ] ) .
further measurements were performed on april 22 and may 7 ( fig.[flare]b&[flare]c ) .
it is noticeable a fading in the peak and integrated intensities and a blue - shift in the velocity of the line by @xmath01kms@xmath1 .
unfortunately , no emission above @xmath030mjy ( 3@xmath10 level ; 0.08kms@xmath1 channel spacing ) was detected in the 22 ghz vla b - array data taken on may 12 .
this fading by at least a factor of 3 within 5 days implies a size scale of @xmath22@xmath23 cm ( @xmath22900au ) or @xmath220.5mas at a distance of 1.8mpc ( @xcite ; see also sect.4.3 ) ; the corresponding brightness temperature is @xmath2410@xmath25k .
the most recent spectrum was obtained on june 22 at effelsberg ( fig.[flare]d ) . confirming the vla result ,
no maser signal was seen above 30mjy ( 3@xmath10 ; channel spacing : 1.05kms@xmath1 ) .
fitting a synthetic gaussian to the data taken on april 3 ( see fig.[map ] ) , i.e. minimizing the sum of the difference squared between calculated and observed peak and integrated flux densities , we can obtain an accurate position of the emitting region : @xmath13 = 03@xmath14 46@xmath15 463 , @xmath17 = + 68@xmath18 0546 .
this is 13 to the west of our center position that coincides with the optical nucleus and the 2@xmath26 m peak @xcite ; @xcite .
the accuracy of the derived maser position has been estimated to be @xmath0 5 .
arising from the central region of ic 342 , but being displaced from the nucleus , the h@xmath7o maser is likely associated with a prominent star forming region . ,
width=302 ] fig .
[ mappadss ] shows an optical b - band image of the central region of ic 342 , taken from the xdss .
the maser emitting region ( white circle ) coincides with an arc - like structure extending e - s and is associated with a chain of sources that appear to be hii regions .
occasionally , prominent galactic star forming regions show narrow ( @xmath00.5 kms@xmath1 ) flaring components that are exceptionally bright .
such flares were observed in w31a and w49 ( @xcite ; @xcite ) .
the prototype of these flares is the 8kms@xmath1 super maser in orion - kl ( e.g. @xcite ) . during several months ,
the narrow highly linearly polarized maser reached flux densities in excess of 5mjy . surpassing the flux of any other velocity component by more than an order of magnitude and reaching a peak luminosity of @xmath27 @xmath0 10@xmath2l@xmath3 , the feature seems to be similar to that seen in ic 342 . while luminosity , linewidth , and flux variations
are reminiscent of the 8kms@xmath1 super maser in orion - kl , our h@xmath7o profiles show a significant velocity shift between april 22 and may 7 ( figs .
[ flare]b and c ) that has not been seen in the orion - kl flaring component . a simple model for explaining both the flare and the shift is , in our opinion , that the latter has a kinematic origin . adopting a scenario of a chance alignment of two masing clouds along the line - of - sight , motion of the foreground relative to the background cloud along the plane of the sky and velocity structure in the foreground cloud
could explain the observed data .
a velocity gradient in the foreground cloud would then first shift the line velocity ; once velocities are reached that are not matched within the background cloud , the flux density of the maser rapidly drops . assuming that the distance between these clouds is @xmath281.8mpc and that their relative velocity in the plane of the sky is at the order of 100kms@xmath1 , this implies a cloud velocity gradient of up to 1kms@xmath1/au during the time the source was monitored .
an almost identical scenario was proposed by @xcite to account for the velocity shift of the flaring water maser component at 66kms@xmath1 in w49n .
the similarity in velocity shift ( @xmath0 0.5kms@xmath1 ) and time scale ( 58 days ) of the event in w49n w.r.t the one in ic 342 , indicates a common origin .
while typical searches for extragalactic maser sources have only yielded detection rates between zero ( e.g. @xcite ) and a few percent ( e.g. @xcite ; @xcite ) , there exists one sample with detection rates @xmath610% : these are the northern ( @xmath29 @xmath6 30@xmath18 ) extragalactic iras ( infrared astronomy satellite ) point sources with 100@xmath26 m fluxes in excess of 50jy ( for a source list , see @xcite ; maffei 2 with @xmath5 @xmath0 200jy should be added to the list ) .
there is a total of 44 galaxies , two ultraluminous galaxies at intermediate distances ( ngc3690 and arp220 ) and 42 nearby sources ( @xmath12 @xmath11 3000kms@xmath1 ) . among these ,
seven ( 16% ) are known to contain h@xmath7o masers in their nuclear region .
two of these contain megamasers ( ngc 1068 and ngc 3079 ) , two are possibly nuclear kilomasers ( ngc 253 and m 51 ; for details , see sect.1 ) , and three are associated with prominent sites of star formation ( ic 10 , ic 342 , m 82 ) . among the subsample of 19 sources with 100@xmath26 m fluxes in excess of 100jy , five
were so far detected in h@xmath7o , yielding a detection rate in excess of 20% . since
few deep integrations have been obtained toward these sources , more h@xmath7o detections can be expected from this promising sample in the near future . we wish to thank nikolaus neininger for useful discussion .
we are also endebted to the operators at the 100-m telescope , and to michael rupen and the nrao analysts , for their cheerful assistance with the observations .
|
luminous extragalactic h@xmath7o masers grouped into three classes tracing accretion disks ngc 4258 ) emission interaction radio jet molecular cloud or accidental overlap between molecular cloud radio continuum ngc 1052 mrk 348 ) related to sites star formation m 33 ic 10 masers detected in nearby galaxies bright in infrared @xcite ) non - nuclear masers important pinpoint sites massive star formation measure velocity vectors determine true distances through observed nearby spiral galaxies ic 342 maffei 2 exhibit prominent nuclear bars strong molecular infrared radio continuum emission results @xmath8 line of h@xmath7o ( rest frequency : 22.23508ghz ) observed with 100-m telescope mpifr at effelsberg toward maffei 2 and ic 342 full width to half power beamwidth was 40 observations in dual beam switching mode beam throw of 2 switching frequency @xmath01hz pointing accuracy better than 10 may 12 , 2001 ic 342 observed with large array ( vla ) in b configuration103 channels 128 observed cover @xmath08kms centered at 16kms lsr effelsberg no continuum subtraction needed data deconvolved using algorithm restoring beam @xmath9 rms noise per channel @xmath010mjy consistent thermal noise single - dish observations maffei 2 no detection 5@xmath10 upper limit 25mjy channel spacing 1.05kms@xmath1 velocity range 250kms@xmath1 + 230kms epoch apr 3 2001 position @xmath13 02@xmath14 41@xmath15 55@xmath162 59@xmath18 36@xmath19 11@xmath20 maser feature observed high velocity resolution spacings after smoothing four channels 0.26kms@xmath1 april 3 22 may 7 june 22 first spectrum taken at ( 0,0 ) position others 10,0 ) dashed line indicates @xmath21 = 16kms@xmath1 spectra central region ic 342 positions offsets spacing between spectra half 100-m effelsberg telescope beam at 22ghz four contiguous channels spectra smoothed to spacing 0.26 kms@xmath1map=453 april 2 2001 first detection water vapor emission ic 342 next night confirmed velocity resolution line profile fig detected feature @xmath21 = 16kms@xmath1 linewidth @xmath00.5kms@xmath1 april 2 no other component seen velocities 175kms@xmath1 @xmath11 + 310kms@xmath1 channel spacing 1.05kms@xmath1 5@xmath10 noise level 16mjy high line intensity @xmath0100mjy good weather emitting region measurements april 22 may 7 fading peak intensities blue - shift velocity line @xmath01kms@xmath1 no emission above @xmath030mjy level 0.08kms@xmath1 spacing detected 22 ghz vla b - array data may 12 fading factor 3 5 days implies size scale @xmath22@xmath23 cm ) or @xmath220.5mas distance 1.8mpc corresponding brightness temperature @xmath2410@xmath25k recent spectrum june 22 effelsberg no maser signal above 30mjy channel spacing 1.05kms@xmath1 synthetic gaussian data april 3minimizing difference between peak flux densities accurate position emitting region @xmath13 = 03@xmath14 46@xmath15 463 @xmath17 = + 68@xmath18 0546 13 west of center position with optical nucleus 2@xmath26 m peak derived maser position @xmath0 5 arising from central region ic 342 displaced from nucleus h@xmath7o maser likely associated with prominent star forming region optical b - band image central region ic 342 maser emitting region coincides with arc - like structure e - s associated with sources hii regions galactic star forming regions show narrow @xmath00.5 kms@xmath1 ) flaring components bright flares observed in w31a w49 prototype 8kms@xmath1 super maser in orion - kl narrow polarized maser reached flux densities 5mjy surpassing flux peak luminosity @xmath27 @xmath0 10@xmath2l@xmath3 feature similar to ic 342luminosity linewidth flux variations reminiscent of 8kms@xmath1 super maser in orion - kl h@xmath7o profiles show significant velocity shift between april 22 and may 7 not seen in orion - kl flaring component model explaining flare shift has kinematic origin chance alignment of two masing clouds motion foreground to background cloud velocity structure explain observed data velocity gradient in foreground cloud line velocity velocities flux density maser drops distance between clouds is @xmath281.8mpc relative velocity 100kms@xmath1 implies cloud velocity gradient of up to 1kms@xmath1/au during source monitored identical scenario proposed by @xcite for velocity shift flaring water maser at 66kms@xmath1 in w49n similarity in velocity shift 0.5kms@xmath1 time scale ( 58 days ) indicates common origin typical searches for extragalactic maser sources yielded detection rates between zero and few percent@xcite sample detection rates @xmath610% northern @xmath29 @xmath6 30@xmath18 extragalactic sources with 100@xmath26 m fluxes 50jy @xcite maffei 2 with @xmath5 @xmath0 200jy total 44 galaxies two ultraluminous galaxies intermediate distances ngc3690 arp220 42 nearby sources @xmath12 @xmath11 3000kms@xmath1 ) seven ( 16% ) contain h@xmath7o masers nuclear region two contain megamasers ngc 1068 3079 two possibly nuclear kilomasers ngc 253 m 51 three associated sites star formation ic 10 ic 342 m 82 ) 19 sources with 100@xmath26 m fluxes 100jy five detected in h@xmath7o detection rate 20% few deep integrations more h@xmath7o detections expected thank nikolaus neininger discussion endebted operators 100-m telescope michael rupen nrao analysts assistance
| 0.356535
| 2,619
| 1,414
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,482
|
we show that , even for a soft collision like forward elastic scattering , the phase of the amplitude is extremely sensitive to a breakdown of strict causality in local @xmath0 .
this is especially the case when the breakdown is manifested by a failure of polynomial boundedness which leads to amplitudes that in some complex direction have order 1 exponential growth in @xmath1 .
-0.24 truecm -0.24 truecm -2.94 truecm 24.94 truecm 16.89 truecm 1.5 truecm 4 truecm on the importance of measuring @xmath2 at @xmath3 n.n .
khuri _ department of physics _ _ the rockefeller university , new york , new york 10021 _ 18 pt at present the best experimental limit on the existence of a fundamental length " , signifying a breakdown in the local nature of quantum field theory ( qft ) , comes from ( g-2 ) calculations and experiments in qed .
if there is a fundamental length , @xmath4 , then from the results on the muon ( g-2 ) we have @xmath5 this leads us to the following estimate @xmath6 with model dependent arguments one can accommodate an @xmath4 such that @xmath7 , but not much better .
however , the following assertion can be safely made : _ today , we have no experimental evidence that can rule out the existence of a fundamental length , " @xmath4 , such that @xmath8_.@xmath9 one should add that we have already reached the end of the road as far as learning more from qed and ( g-2 ) regarding this issue . at the level of @xmath10
both electroweak and hadronic contributions to ( g-2 ) become important .
the forward dispersion relations for @xmath11 and @xmath12 scattering represent one of the few general rigorous consequences of local quantum field theory .
one tests their validity by measuring @xmath13 , and comparing the results with the calculated @xmath2 obtained from the dispersion relations with @xmath14 as an input .
these tests have been carried out at increasing energies for both @xmath11 , and @xmath12 .
the highest energy , @xmath12 only , is @xmath15 .
the agreement between theory and experiment is good , as can be seen from figure 1 .
a measurement of @xmath2 at @xmath16 will explore a short distance domain about which we have little previous knowledge .
this is in contrast to the preceeding measurements which dealt with length scales that had already been pre - explored by qed . however , there is a problem .
the particle physics folklore includes statements to the effect that short distance structure shows up first , and in more easily detectable ways , in , and not in such as forward elastic scattering .
unfortunately , when statements like the above are repeated for 35 years , people get to be rather sloppy in using them . in this brief talk
i will clarify this problem and show that in a domain where the dispersion relations no longer hold , @xmath2 is extremely sensitive to the existence of a fundamental length , @xmath4 , and changes drastically even when @xmath17 .
the dilemma between hard and soft collisions can be clarified as follows . given some kind of structure at short distance , @xmath4
, we can make the following correct statement : _ as we approach the energy region such that @xmath18 is non - negligible , then hard cross - sections will in general show a more detectable and larger change than soft cross - sections_. this statement , though not extremely precise , is in general qualitatively correct .
however , if in the same statement we replace by then the statement is false , as we shall demonstrate by counterexample . of course when local qft is valid , then for the forward scattering amplitude , @xmath19 , if @xmath20 does not change much in a certain region so will @xmath21 and @xmath2 because one can use the dispersion relation to get @xmath2 from @xmath14 .
but , in a world in which the dispersion relations or qft fail , @xmath2 as we shall show below can be extremely sensitive to a breakdown in qft .
the main purpose of this talk is to give a counterexample " to the statement about soft amplitudes being insensitive to a short distance breakdown in qft .
indeed , i will show that when traditional qft is changed by a breakdown in polynomial boundedness , which in many models is the main feature of the existence of a fundamental length , then the phase , @xmath2 , could change by more than a factor of 2 even for energies as low as @xmath22 .
this happens without any significant change in @xmath14 or @xmath23 .
before we present our counterexample " , we summarize briefly the well established properties of @xmath19 in local qft .
we have the following : i ) @xmath19 is analytic in the doubly cut s - plane ; ii ) @xmath19 is crossing symmetric , relating @xmath11 for @xmath24 to @xmath12 for @xmath25 ; iii ) @xmath26 satisfies the optical theorem , @xmath27 ; iv ) @xmath19 is polynomially bounded in all directions in the cut complex s - plane , @xmath28 we have argued in ref .
2 , that the most likely property to change is iv ) , i.e. equation ( 3 ) . properties ii ) and iii ) are on a solid footing .
while even if property i ) , analyticity , fails due to some new complex singularities on the physical sheet , these will not lead to a strong signal except for @xmath29 ( new singularities ) . the breakdown in iv )
replaces equ .
( 3 ) by an exponential bound : @xmath30 in fact we claim more .
namely , that along some complex s direction , @xmath31 grows exponentially like @xmath32 .
note that a behavior of the type @xmath33 , with @xmath34 , is excluded due to some technical mathematical arguments .
hence one goes from @xmath35 behavior to a first order exponential in @xmath36 .
there are several examples which exhibit the behavior ( 4 ) .
these are : a. ) non - local potential scattering here one replaces the interaction term in the schrodinger equation , by a non - local one , i.e. , @xmath37 where @xmath38 b. ) some nonlocal field theories .
c. ) string - theory@xmath39 ( @xmath40 once we have exponential behavior in @xmath41 we have a natural way to a fundamental length " .
noting that @xmath42 momentum for large @xmath43 , then the @xmath4 we use in the bound to make a dimensionless exponent is by definition our fundamental length .
we take the smallest @xmath4 such that for some complex sequence @xmath44 , as @xmath45 , @xmath26 actually grows like @xmath46 .
our main counterexample is a representative of what happens in non - local potential scattering as defined by equ .
( 5 ) and ( 6 ) .
it also mimics the behavior of some non - local field theories , although these admittedly have serious problems . in non - local potential scattering one
can easily prove the analyticity of @xmath47 , but @xmath26 is not polynomially bounded as @xmath48 .
however , one can prove that @xmath49 as @xmath48 in all directions .
the physical sheet here corresponds to @xmath50 , and @xmath4 is defined in equ.(6 ) .
these facts lead us to the following ansatz : @xmath51 where @xmath52 is the true amplitude , and @xmath53 is a false " amplitude defined by ( 7 ) .
the true amplitude satisfies the optical theorem , @xmath54 , but @xmath55 is not necessarily positive .
however , by definition it is @xmath56 that is polynomially bounded .
also @xmath56 satisfies the dispersion relations albeit with a non - positive @xmath55 .
finally , @xmath57 has no dispersion relation because of its exponential growth when @xmath58 , and @xmath59 .
at first the ansatz(7 ) looks like a tautology , or at best a definition of @xmath53.nevertheless , because of the special properties of @xmath2 for @xmath60 we can still learn much from this ansatz .
we consider two energy regions .
a low " energy region @xmath61 , and a transitional " region @xmath62 .
we also note the fact that for @xmath63 , @xmath2 is small and decreases logarithmically . at @xmath64 , we have @xmath65 .
given the fact that cosmic ray data tell us that @xmath14 will continue to increase , @xmath66 , the dispersion relation fit shown by the curve in figure 1 , will continue to decrease slowly as @xmath41 increases .
we consider the two energy regions separately . a. low energy region , @xmath67 in this region , we have @xmath68 there is no observable difference between the polynomially bounded amplitude and the exponentially bounded one . b. transitional region here
@xmath69 is small but not negligible , @xmath70 note that @xmath41 is still well below @xmath71 . from the ansatz(7 ) , we obtain @xmath72,\ ] ] at this stage it is important to remark that the second term in the bracket in ( 10 ) is doubly small , @xmath73 is small and @xmath74 .
we obtain @xmath75.\ ] ] to proceed further let us assume that in the transitional region , @xmath76 , a bound almost 2.5 times larger than the value of @xmath2 at @xmath77 .
we hasten to add that this assumption is not really needed , but it gives us a quick way to arrive at our result .
later we shall show how one can get the same result without this assumption .
we now have , @xmath78,\ ] ] for @xmath79 .
thus in the transitional region @xmath80 , and hence @xmath81 for @xmath82 and the optical theorem holds for @xmath55 to a very good approximation . but @xmath53 satisfies a dispersion relation , and we can therefore use the approximate derivative form of the dispersion relations@xmath83 to get @xmath84 where @xmath85 is the dispersion relation fit to @xmath2 as the one shown by the continuous curve in figure 1 . the true " and false " phases are related by @xmath86 with @xmath87 .
after some simple algebra we get @xmath88 but @xmath89 in the transitional region . replacing @xmath90 by @xmath66 in ( 15 ) and expanding in powers of @xmath91 , we get @xmath92 the error , @xmath93 , is determined by @xmath94 there are two important features of our final result ( 16 ) which should be stressed .
first , while @xmath66 decreases logarithmically the additional term @xmath95 increases linearly with @xmath41 , and even when @xmath96 it leads to a 75% increase in @xmath2 .
the second feature is the fact that @xmath4 appears linearly in ( 16 ) , unlike the correction to the muon ( g-2 ) in equ .
( 1 ) which was @xmath97 , with @xmath98 appearing in the correction .
since @xmath4 is very small , this makes the qed case less sensitive to a fundamental length . in figure 1
we plot @xmath73 for @xmath99 .
the fact that @xmath2 is sensitive is amply demonstrated . in closing
, we explain briefly how our assumption on @xmath100 can be removed .
one has to divide the interval , @xmath101 , into @xmath102 small intervals , @xmath103 .
then one carries out the same calculation we did above step by step starting at @xmath104 , and calculating @xmath73 at the next point . at each step one uses the approximation @xmath105 . the result given by equ.(16 )
remains the same .
there are other examples which lead to a decrease in @xmath2 rather than the increase given by the ansatz ( 7 ) .
for example one could have instead of ( 7 ) , @xmath106 this leads to @xmath107 with the result shown in figure 1 for @xmath108 , and labeled as case ii .
our ansatz is an example of a whole class where one can write @xmath109 , where @xmath110 is an entire function of order 1 .
all these lead , via similar arguments , to a dramatic change in @xmath2 , @xmath111 where @xmath112 . in conclusion , @xmath2 is extremely sensitive to a short distance breakdown of qft , and more so if that breakdown is manifested by the failure of polynomial boundedness and its replacement by exponential growth which is order 1 in the variable @xmath113 . here
@xmath114 is the c.m .
momentum in forward scattering , and @xmath4 we take , by definition , to be the fundamental length " . strictly within the context of this picture
, we can set the following limits on a breakdown in polynomial boundedness : 1 . ) @xmath115 gives us a lower limit for @xmath116 , @xmath117 . 2 .
) @xmath118 if redone with smaller errors could improve this bound to @xmath119 ; here @xmath120 . 3 .
) agreement between @xmath121 and @xmath122 at lhc could get us @xmath123 .
|
this work was supported in part by the u.s .
department of energy under grant no .
doe91er40651 taskb .
[ 1 ] t. kinoshita , _ quantum electrodynamics _ , t.k
. editor , ( world scientific , 1990 ) , pp .
it should be stressed that one should not confuse our @xmath4 here with the limits on the lepton or quark form factors in qcd . in axiomatic qft
even the deuteron , which certainly is composite , has an interpolating field which is strictly causal , i.e. two field operators at x and y commute if @xmath124 , i.e. spacelike .
this leads to dispersion relations for forward @xmath125 scattering .
if @xmath126 does not satisfy strict causality , this will have little to do with whether @xmath127 or the electron are composite or not .
[ 2 ] n.n .
khuri , proceedings of les recontres de physiques da la vallee daoste : _ results and perspectives in particle physics " _ ( m. greco , ed . ) , pp * 701 - 708*. editions frontieres , gif - sur - yvette , france , 1994 .
|
work supported by u.s department of energy grant doe91er40651 t. kinoshita quantum electrodynamics editor world scientific 1990 confuse @xmath4 with limits lepton quark form factors in qcd axiomatic qft deuteron composite has interpolating field strictly causal two field operators x y commute @xmath124 spacelike leads to dispersion relations for @xmath125 scattering if @xmath126 satisfy causality little @xmath127 or electron composite n. khuri proceedings recontres de physiques results perspectives particle m. greco ed pp 701 - editions frontieres gif - sur - yvette france 1994
| 0.070728
| 265
| 135
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,485
|
it is shown that the density of states ( dos ) proportional to the excitation energy , the so - called polar like dos , can arise in the odd - parity states with the superconducting gap vanishing at points even if the spin - orbit interaction for cooper pairing is strong enough .
such gap stuructures are realized in the non - unitary states , f@xmath0 , f@xmath1 , and f@xmath2 , classified by volovik and gorkov , _ sov .
phys.@xmath3jetp _ * 61 * ( 1985 ) 843 .
this is due to the fact that the gap vanishes in quadratic manner around the point on the fermi surface .
it is also shown that the region of quadratic energy dependence of dos , in the state f@xmath4 , is restricted in very small energy region making it difficult to distinguish from the polar - like dos . in early stage of research of the heavy fermion superconductors
, it has been important to infer the gap anisotropy from the power - law of the temperature dependence of a series of physical quantities @xcite .
it was a sort of the golden rule there that point node(s ) of the superconducting gap leads to the density of states ( dos ) , @xmath5 , while line node(s ) leads to @xmath6 .
it was also emphasized that all the odd - parity pairings would have only point node(s ) if the spin - orbit coupling for the pairing interaction were so strong that the spin- and orbital degrees of freedom of the gap function can not change independently @xcite .
however , it is not so self - evident whether the spin - orbit coupling for pairing is really so strong to quench technically the independent variation in spin- and orbital space @xcite . in any case
, the classification scheme proposed by volovik and gorkov ( vg ) has been believed to rule out the polar - like dos for the odd - parity states .
the purpose of this letter is to point out that three of the non - unitary states in vg scheme has the polar - like dos because the @xmath7-dependence of the gap around the point node is quadratic rather than linear . in the odd - parity manifold , the quasiparticle energy is the matrix in the representation of spin eigen state as follows @xcite : @xmath8^{1/2 } , \label{dispersion}\ ] ] where the superconducting gap is also the 2@xmath92 matrix in the presentation of spin eigenstate , and is represented in terms of the @xmath10-vector as @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the pauli matrix of the @xmath13-the component , with @xmath13=@xmath14 , @xmath15 , and @xmath16 .
the eigen values of the magnitude of the gap matrix is given as @xcite @xmath17 .
\label{eigenvalue}\ ] ] it is remarked that the time reversal symmetry is broken in the non - unitary state where @xmath18 the dos in the superconducting state @xmath19 is expressed as follows : @xmath20 where @xmath21 is the heaviside function .
the @xmath10-vector of the state f@xmath22 , the class of group theoretical representaion @xmath23 , is given as @xcite @xmath24 , \label{f1u1i}\ ] ] where @xmath25 .
then , the magnitude of the gap is calculated , leading to the expression @xmath26 it is remarked that the amplitude of the smaller gap @xmath27^{1/2}$ ] has point nodes in the direction @xmath28 , and has a quadratic dependence as @xmath29 around the node on the the fermi sphere .
therefore , the dos is proportional to the excitation energy @xmath30 . with the use of ( [ eigenvaluef1u1i ] ) ,
the dos is calculated numerically by means of the formula ( [ dos ] ) .
the result is shown in fig .
[ fig:1 ] .
the shape of the dos is similar to those for the polar state .
the @xmath10-vector of the state f@xmath31 , the class of group theoretical representaion @xmath23 , is given as @xcite @xmath32 .
\label{f2u1i}\ ] ] the magnitude of the gap is calculated , leading to the same expression as ( [ eigenvaluef1u1i ] ) .
therefore , the dos @xmath19 is the same as shown in fig .
[ fig:1 ] , the polar - like one . in the states
f@xmath22 and f@xmath31 , @xmath33 being the dos in the normal state at the fermi level .
the dashed curve is for the dos of the polar state @xmath34 . ]
the @xmath10-vector of the state f@xmath1 , the class of group theoretical representaion @xmath35 , is given as @xcite @xmath36 , \label{f1uee}\ ] ] where @xmath37 .
then , the magnitude of the gap is calculated , leading to the expression @xmath38 the smaller gap @xmath27^{1/2}$ ] has point nodes in the direction @xmath39 , and has also a quadratic dependence as ( [ eigenvaluef1u1i ] ) .
so , the dos is proportional to the excitation energy @xmath30 , and its explicit dependence is calculated numerically by means of the formula ( [ dos ] ) .
the result is shown in fig .
[ fig:2 ] .
the dos is the same as those for the polar state @xmath34 . in the state f@xmath1 ,
@xmath33 being the dos in the normal state at the fermi level .
this is the same as that of the polar state @xmath34 within numerical errors .
] the @xmath10-vector of the state f@xmath4 , the class of group theoretical representaion @xmath35 , is given as @xcite @xmath40 .
\label{f2uee}\ ] ] the magnitude of the gap is calculated as @xmath41^{1/2}\biggr\ } \label{eigenvaluef2uee}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the smaller gap @xmath27^{1/2}$ ] has point nodes in the direction @xmath39 .
the gap vanishes linearly around the nodes so that the dos is proportional to the square of the energy @xmath30 .
however , the region of @xmath30 where @xmath42 holds is very restricted , i.e. , @xmath43 , as shown in fig
. [ fig:3 ] .
therefore , the temperature dependence of physical quantities is hard to distinguish from those of the polar - like state . in the state f@xmath4 , @xmath33 being the dos in the normal state at the fermi level . ]
other example , in which the point node(s ) give the polar - like dos , is the so - called planar state with e@xmath44 symmetry which is unitary state and was proposed as a candidate of that of upt@xmath45 @xcite .
such a state gives a magnitude of the gap as @xmath46^{1/2}. \label{eigenvaluee2u}\ ] ] this gap has point nodes at @xmath28 and shows the quardatic behaviour around the node on the fermi surface .
so , the quasiparticles around the point nodes should also give the polar - like dos if there exists the fermi surface around the nodes . in conclusion ,
we have pointed out by explicit calculations that the superconducting gap with point nodes in the non - unitary states , f@xmath0 , f@xmath1 , and f@xmath2 , classified by volovik and gorkov , exhibits the polar - like dos which is proportional to the excitation energy itself rather than its square .
this results arises from the fact that the @xmath7-dependence of the gap around the point nodes is quadratic rather than linear as expected in general .
the author acknowledges y. aoki for cummunications urging the author to calculate the density of states of various states in the volovik and gorkov classification scheme . this work was supported in part by a grant - in - aid for coe research program ( no .
10ce2004 ) by the ministry of education , culture , sports , science and technology .
|
9 schmitt - rink s , miyake k and varma c m 1986 _ phys .
lett . _ * 56 * 2575 miyake k 1987 _ j. magn .
_ * 63&64 * 411 hirschfeld p vollhardt d wlfle p 1986 _ solid state commun . _ * 59 * 111 hirschfeld p j wlfle p einzel d 1988 _ phys .
_ b * 37 * 83 anderson p w 1984 _ phys .
30 * 4000 volovik g e gorkov l p 1985 _ sov . phys.@xmath3jetp _ * 61 * 843 ueda k rice t m 1985 _ phys . rev .
_ b * 31 * 7114 blount e i 1985 _ phys . rev .
_ b * 32 * 2935 sigrist m ueda k 1991 _ rev .
phys . _ * 63 * 308 miyake k 1985 _ theory of heavy fermions and valence fluctuations _ eds .
kasuya t and saso t ( springer series in solid state sciences * 62 * ) p 256 ozaki m machida k 1989 _ phys .
_ b * 39 * 4145 leggett a j 1975 _ rev .
_ * 47 * 331 machida k nishira t and ohmi t 1999 _ j. phys .
jpn . _ * 68 * 3364 sauls j a 1994 _ j. low temp .
phys . _ * 95 * 153
|
schmitt rink miyake varma 1986 phys 56 * 2575 miyake 1987 63&64 * 411 hirschfeld vollhardt wlfle p 1986 solid state 59 * 111 hirschfeld wlfle einzel d 1988 phys 37 * 83 anderson p 1984 30 4000 volovik gorkov l 1985 61 * 843 ueda rice 1985 31 7114 blount 1985 32 2935 sigrist ueda 1991 63 * 308 miyake k 1985 theory heavy fermions valence fluctuations kasuya saso t springer series solid state sciences 256 ozaki machida k 1989 phys 39 * 4145 leggett 1975 47 * 331 machida nishira ohmi t 1999 68 * 3364 sauls j 1994 low phys 95 * 153
| 0.07056
| 362
| 209
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,490
|
measured @xmath0 production cross sections for 200 and 450 gev / c protons incident on a variety of nuclear targets are analyzed within a glauber framework which takes into account energy loss of the beam proton , the time delay of particle production due to quantum coherence , and absorption of the @xmath0 on nucleons .
the best representation is obtained for a coherence time of 0.5 fm / c , previously determined by drell - yan production in proton - nucleus collisions , and an absorption cross section of 3.6 mb , which is consistent with the value deduced from photoproduction of the @xmath0 on nuclear targets .
pacs numbers : 13.85.ni , 24.85.+p , 11.80.la + propagation of a highly relativistic particle through a medium is of interest in several areas of physics . high energy proton - nucleus scattering has been studied for many decades by both the nuclear and particle physics communities @xcite .
such studies are particularly relevant for the relativistic heavy ion collider ( rhic ) , which will collide beams of gold nuclei at an energy of 100 gev per nucleon , and for the large hadron collider ( lhc ) , which will collide beams of lead nuclei at 1500 gev per nucleon @xcite . in a recent paper
@xcite we modeled the production of high mass , drell - yan , pairs of leptons as measured in collisions of 800 gev / c protons incident on a variety of nuclear targets by the fermilab collaboration e772 @xcite .
our modeling was done on the basis of hadronic degrees of freedom .
we took into account the energy loss of the beam proton as it traversed the nucleus as well as the landau - pomeranchuk - migdal effect @xcite .
the latter basically acknowledges that there is a time ordering in the appearance of produced particles ; the hard particles ( drell - yan pairs ) appear before the soft particles ( typically pions ) .
this is a quantum mechanical effect , essentially the uncertainty principle . by fitting to the atomic mass number dependence of the drell - yan cross section at high feynman @xmath1 we were able to infer a value for the proper coherence or formation time of 0.4@xmath20.1 fm / c .
this value is about what should be expected _ a priori_. in the center of mass frame of the colliding nucleons at the energies of interest a typical pion
is produced with an energy of e@xmath3 mev . by the uncertainty principle
this takes a time of order @xmath4 fm / c .
a related process is the production of @xmath0 in high energy proton - nucleus collisions which we shall address in this paper .
this is also a relatively hard process and so both energy loss of the beam proton and the landau - pomeranchuk - migdal effect must be taken into account .
however , there is an additional effect which plays a role , and that is the occasional absorption or breakup of the @xmath0 in encounters with target nucleons .
( the inelastic interaction of one of the leptons in drell - yan production with target nucleons is ignorably small . )
the absorption cross section , @xmath5 , has been estimated in a straightforward glauber analysis without energy loss and with an infinite coherence / formation time to be about 6 - 7 mb @xcite .
this has formed the basis for many analyses of @xmath0 suppression in heavy ion collisions .
any anomalous suppression may be an indication of the formation of quark - gluon plasma @xcite , hence the importance of obtaining the most accurate value of @xmath5 possible .
this cross section has also been inferred from photoproduction experiments of @xmath0 on nuclei from which a value much less than that has been obtained @xcite .
this has been a puzzle .
one attempt to resolve this apparent discrepancy consists of modeling the produced @xmath6 state as a pre - resonant color dipole state with two octet charges @xcite ; however , the results are only semi - quantitative . for a basic description of high energy proton - nucleus scattering we prefer to work with hadronic variables rather than partonic ones .
we make a straightforward linear extrapolation from proton - proton scattering .
this extrapolation , referred to as lexus , was detailed and applied to nucleus - nucleus collisions at beam energies of several hundred gev per nucleon in ref .
@xcite , and to drell - yan production in 800 gev proton - nucleus collisions in ref .
@xcite . in order to compute the production cross section of @xmath0 in proton - nucleus collisions
we need a parametrization of it in the more elementary nucleon - nucleon collisions . for this
we call upon the parametrization of a compilation of data by loureno @xcite .
@xmath7 here @xmath8 is the branching ratio into dimuons and @xmath9 is the ratio of the momentum carried by @xmath0 to the beam momentum in the center of mass frame @xmath10 . due to the degradation in momentum of the proton as it traverses the nucleus it is important to know the @xmath9 dependence of the production .
the fermilab experiment e789 has measured this dependence at 800 gev / c @xcite to be proportional to @xmath11 .
assuming that this holds at lower energy too we use the joint @xmath12 and @xmath9 functional dependence and magnitude : @xmath13 the cross section in proton - nucleus collisions can now be computed in lexus with no ambiguity .
with @xmath14 in proton - nucleus collisions at 200 gev / c .
the data is from na38 @xcite .
the dashed line is @xmath15 times the nucleon - nucleon production cross section .
the solid curve represents full energy loss with zero coherence / formation time , while the banded region represents partial energy loss with a coherence / formation time within the limits set by drell - yan production .
( computations were done for c , al , cu , w and u and the points connected by straight lines to guide the eye.),width=377 ] figures 1 and 2 show the results of our calculation in comparison to data taken by na38 @xcite .
the dashed curves are @xmath15 times the nucleon - nucleon production cross section ; they obviously overestimate the data .
the solid curves show the result of lexus with full energy degradation of the beam proton without account taken of the landau - pomeranchuk - migdal effect ; they obviously underestimate the data .
the hatched regions represent the inclusion of the latter effect with a proper formation / coherence time @xmath16 in the range of 0.3 to 0.5 fm / c consistent with drell - yan production @xcite .
the time delay is implemented as follows @xcite : the energy available for the production of @xmath0 is that which the proton had @xmath17 collisions prior ; that is , the previous @xmath17 collisions are ignored for the purpose of determining the proton s energy .
this is an approximate treatment of the landau - pomeranchuk - migdal effect .
the @xmath17 is related to the beam energy and to the coherence time @xmath16 in the center of mass frame of the colliding nucleons .
the proper coherence time is essentially the same as the proper formation time of a pion since most pions are produced with rapidities near zero in that frame .
the first proton - nucleon collision is the most important , so boosting this time into the rest frame of the target nucleus and converting it to a path length ( proton moves essentially at the speed of light ) gives @xmath18 .
this path length may then be equated with @xmath17 times the mean free path @xmath19 . using a total cross section of 40 mb , a nuclear matter density of 0.155 nucleons/@xmath20 , and @xmath21
fm / c we obtain @xmath22 at 200 gev / c and @xmath23 at 450 gev / c .
as may be seen from the figures , the data is overestimated , indicating the necessity for nuclear absorption .
absorption cross section of 3.6 mb.,width=377 ] absorption cross section of 3.6 mb.,width=377 ] we now introduce a @xmath0 absorption cross section on nucleons and compute its effect within lexus in the canonical way @xcite .
when the @xmath0 is created there will in general be a nonzero number of nucleons blocking its exit from the nucleus .
knowing where the @xmath0 is created allows one to calculate how many nucleons lie in its path , and hence , to compute the probability that it will be dissociated into open charm .
we choose a value of @xmath16 allowed by drell - yan measurements , mentioned above , and then vary @xmath5 , assuming that it is energy independent .
the lowest value of chi - squared for the 200 and 450 gev / c data set taken together is obtained with @xmath24 fm / c and @xmath25 mb .
the results are shown in figures 3 and 4 .
the fitted values all lie within one standard deviation of the data points .
this is quite a satisfactory representation of the data .
it means that both drell - yan and @xmath0 production in high energy proton - nucleus collisions can be understood in terms of a conventional hadronic analysis when account is taken of the energy loss of the beam proton , the landau - pomeranchuk - migdal effect , and nuclear absorption of the @xmath0 in the final state .
it also means that the absorption cross section for @xmath0 inferred from high energy proton - nucleus collisions is consistent with the value inferred from photoproduction experiments on nuclei
. it will be very instructive to repeat this analysis in the language of partonic variables .
actually , the analysis with parton energy loss alone was reported by gavin and milana @xcite with satisfactory results obtained for drell - yan and @xmath0 if the partons lose about 1.5 gev / fm .
nuclear shadowing @xcite needs to be taken into account too .
the relationship among all these effects is not well - understood , nor is the relationship between these effects in partonic and hadronic variables .
finally , the implications for nucleus - nucleus collisions @xcite will undoubtedly be important ; they are under investigation .
|
the authors gratefully acknowledge discussions with s. gavin , d. kharzeev , c. loureno , j. moss , and h. satz .
c.g . thanks the school of physics and astronomy at the university of minnesota for its hospitality during a sabbatical leave . c.g . and j.k .
thank the institute for nuclear theory at the university of washington for its hospitality and the department of energy for partial support during the program
probes of dense matter in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions " .
this work was also supported by the u. s. department of energy under grant de - fg02 - 87er40328 , by the natural sciences and engineering research council of canada , by the fonds fcar of the quebec government , and by the director , office of energy research , office of high energy and nuclear physics , division of nuclear physics , of the u.s .
department of energy under contract no .
de - ac03 - 76sf00098 and de - fg03 - 93er40792 .
|
authors acknowledge discussions with gavin kharzeev loureno moss satz thanks school astronomy university minnesota hospitality sabbatical leave thank institute nuclear theory university washington hospitality department energy support probes dense matter heavy ion collisions work supported by u s. department energy grant de - fg02 - 87er40328 natural sciences engineering research council canada fonds fcar quebec government director office energy research high energy nuclear physics nuclear physics department energy contract de - ac03 - 76sf00098 de - fg03 - 93er40792
| 0.068798
| 220
| 107
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,505
|
in a recent article [ arxiv:1108.5127 ] park has shown that the four - state predator - prey model studied earlier in _ j. stat .
mech , l05001 ( 2011 ) _ belongs to directed percolation ( dp ) universality class .
it was claimed that predator density is not a reasonable order parameter , as there are many absorbing states ; a suitably chosen order parameter shows dp critical behaviour . in this article
, we argue that the configuration that does not have any predator is the only dynamically accessible absorbing configuration , and the predator density too settles to dp critical exponents after a long transient .
^s__a systems having absorbing configurations may undergo a non - equilibrium phase transition @xcite from an active to an absorbing state .
the critical behavior of these absorbing state phase transitions ( apts ) @xcite depends on the the symmetry of the order parameter and presence of additional conservation laws .
it has been conjectured @xcite that in absence of any special symmetry the apt belongs to the directed percolation ( dp ) universality class as long as the system has a single absorbing state .
since the coarse grained microscopic theory of dp , which is a birth - death - diffusion process , is based on a single component reggeon field theory@xcite , critical behavior in presence of additional field is expected to alter the critical behavior .
the additional field may bring in multiple absorbing states and/or additional conservation laws .
presence of multiple absorbing states may @xcite or may not @xcite affect the universality .
coupling of order parameter to a conserved field too lead to dp @xcite or non - dp @xcite critical behavior .
the models of directed percolation with more than one species @xcite , which brings in additional coarse grained fields , has also been studied @xcite .
the predator - prey cellular automaton models @xcite in higher dimension too shows an apt to an absorbing ( extinct ) state which belongs to dp - class .
the role of additional fields in these models are not quite well understood .
recently we studied a predator - prey model@xcite on a @xmath0-dimensional lattice , where each lattice site is either vacant , occupied by a predator @xmath1 , a prey @xmath2 or both ( one @xmath1 and one @xmath2 ) . in these four state predator - prey ( 4spp ) model growth of preys and death of predators occurs independently , whereas death of a prey is always followed by instant birth of a predator .
based on the numerical simulations and estimated critical exponents , we have suggested the possibility of a new universality class . in particular , the decay of clusters at the critical point was found to be distinctly different from those of dp .
however , in a recent article park @xcite has suggested a different scenario .
it was claimed that the predator density @xmath3 can not be taken as a order parameter as there are infinitely many absorbing states .
the transition is found to be in dp class , when order parameter is chosen suitably . in this article , we show that although there are many absorbing states , only one of them @xmath4 is dynamically accessible . in fact
the order parameter @xmath3 which was showing an apparently new critical behavior , slowly crosses over to dp . for completeness , first let us define the model . on a one dimensional periodic lattice ,
each site is either vacant , or occupied by a single particle @xmath1 ( prey ) , or occupied by a single particle @xmath2 ( predator ) or by both particles ( co - existing @xmath1 and @xmath2 ) ; correspondingly at each site @xmath5 we have @xmath6 alternatively one may describe the 4-state predator - prey ( 4spp ) model considering two separate branches , one for @xmath1 and the other for @xmath2 particles , where particles living in one branch can not move to the other .
we consider only the asymmetric case of the model which evolves according to the following dynamics , where @xmath7 denotes both presence and absence of particles in respective branches .
( 100 , 35 ) ( -10,30)(-11,28.5)@xmath8(-16,30)(-18,28.5)@xmath1 ( -10,24)(-12,22.5)@xmath7(-16,24)(-18,22.5)@xmath7 ( -7,25)@xmath9(-5,28)@xmath10 ( 10,30)(8,28.5)@xmath1(4,30)(2,28.5)@xmath1 ( 10,24)(8,22.5)@xmath7(4,24)(2,22.5)@xmath7 ( 40,30)(38,28.5)@xmath7(34,30)(32,28.5)@xmath7 ( 40,24)(38,22.5)@xmath2(34,24)(32,22.5)@xmath2 ( 43,25)@xmath9(45,28)@xmath11 ( 60,30)(58,28.5)@xmath7(54,30)(52,28.5)@xmath7 ( 60,24)(59,22.5)@xmath8(54,24)(53,22.5)@xmath8 ( 90,30)(88,28.5)@xmath1(84,30)(82,28.5)@xmath7 ( 90,24)(89,22.5)@xmath8(84,24)(82,22.5)@xmath2 ( 93,25)@xmath9(95,28)@xmath12 ( 110,30)(109,28.5)@xmath8(104,30)(102,28.5)@xmath7 ( 110,24)(108,22.5)@xmath2(104,24)(102,22.5)@xmath2 although , it was not explicitly mentioned in our earlier report @xcite , numerical simulations of the model was carried out in using exactly the same state variables @xmath13 mentioned in @xcite .
clearly these bond variables @xmath14 follow a dynamical rules , @xmath15 the neighbors are updated along with @xmath16 as follows .
for dynamics ( [ eq:1 ] ) @xmath17 is increased by @xmath18 whereas for dynamics ( [ eq:2 ] ) @xmath17 and @xmath19 are decreased by @xmath20 and @xmath21 respectively . clearly a bond @xmath5 is active when @xmath16 is either @xmath18 or @xmath22 , or it is greater than @xmath23 it was argued by park @xcite that the density of active bonds @xmath24 , the correct order parameter ( as there are infinitely many absorbing states ) of the system , vanishes at the critical point @xmath25 when @xmath26 and @xmath27 for the same parameter values , we had estimated earlier that predator density @xmath3 vanishes at @xmath28 .
this raises a question that possibly in the region @xmath29 , the system falls into an absorbing state which has isolated @xmath2s .
however a configuration with one or more isolated @xmath2 can be absorbing only when there are no @xmath1s .
thus , at @xmath30 we must have @xmath31 it was evident from fig .
2(a ) of ref . @xcite that @xmath32 this indicates that @xmath3 must vanish at the same value of @xmath33 possibly at @xmath34 as estimated by park @xcite .
vs @xmath35 for @xmath36 with @xmath37 , @xmath38 and @xmath39 . here
we use dp critical exponent @xmath40 ( b ) both @xmath41 and @xmath42 asymptotically decay as @xmath43 at @xmath44.,width=529 ] to check this we redo the monte - carlo simulation for larger system size @xmath39 and measured @xmath42 up to @xmath45 mcs for different values of @xmath33 while keeping @xmath26 and @xmath27 from fig .
[ fig : pc](a ) it is evident that @xmath46 shows a saturation at @xmath47 for @xmath48 figure [ fig : pc](b ) shows log - scale plot of @xmath41 and @xmath42 at @xmath49 it is evident that after a long transient @xmath42 decays as @xmath50 with @xmath51 , similar to @xmath52 such a change in @xmath53 to a lower value was appearing as a saturation in @xmath3 , leading to a lower estimate of the critical point .
vs @xmath35 at criticality ( @xmath54 @xmath37 and @xmath38)for @xmath55 and @xmath56 . the initial slope @xmath57 crosses over to @xmath58 as system size is increased .
( b ) the same data are collapsed according to eq .
( [ eq : rhot_l ] ) by using dp critical exponents @xmath59 and @xmath60,width=491 ] with this correct estimation of critical point , we proceed to calculate other critical exponents taking @xmath3 as the order parameter . as for finite system of size
@xmath61 , starting from a high density of predators , @xmath62 decays as @xmath50 , indicating a scaling form @xmath63 at the critical point , where @xmath64 is the dynamical critical exponent .
thus , @xmath65 for different values of @xmath61 are expected to collapse to a single function when plotted against @xmath66 .
figure [ fig : z_nu](a ) shows decay of @xmath67 for different @xmath61 starting from the configuration @xmath68 ; clearly small systems show an effective exponent @xmath57 which crosses over to @xmath69 as the system size is increased .
true finite size effect of the critical point sets in at a reasonably large @xmath70 the data collapse according to eq .
( [ eq : rhot_l ] ) is observed in fig .
[ fig : z_nu](b ) where we use the dp exponents @xmath71 and @xmath72 in summary , although there are many absorbing configurations in 4spp model , the numerical simulations suggests that only one of them @xmath73 is dynamically accessible .
the critical behavior of the absorbing transition can be well described by taking @xmath3 as an order parameter .
the earlier estimated values of the critical exponents vary slowly with system size and settle to dp values .
these studies truly emphasize the complications , difficulties and danger associated in numerical determination of universality class , when the possibility of a long transient is not ruled out .
_ acknowledgement : _ pkm would like to acknowledge m. basu and u. basu for doing independent monte - carlo simulations to confirm the results .
|
99 j. marro and r. dickman , _ nonequilibrium phase transitions in lattice models _ ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 1999 ) . h. hinrichsen , advances in physics * 49 * , 815 ( 2000 ) ; m. henkel , h. hinrichsen , and s. lbeck , _ non - equilibrium phase transitions _ , berlin : springer ( 2008 ) .
p. grassberger , z. phys .
b * 47 * , 365 ( 1982 ) ; h. k. janssen , z. phys .
b * 42 * , 151 ( 1981 ) . j. l. cardy and r. l. sugar , j. phys .
a : math . gen . * 13 * l423 ( 1980 ) .
a. lipowski and m. lopata , phys .
e * 60 * , 1516(1999 ) .
m. basu , u. gayen , and p. k. mohanty , _ arxiv:1102.1631 _ ; a. ghosh , u. basu , a. chakraborti , and b. k. chakrabarti , phys .
e * 83 * , 061130 ( 2011 ) .
i. jensen , phys .
lett . * 70 * , 1465 , ( 1993 ) ; i. jensen and r. dickman , phys .
e * 48 * , 1710 ( 1993 ) ; j. f. f. mendes , r. dickman , m. henkel , and m. c. marques , j. phys .
a * 27 * , 3019 ( 1994 ) ; d. ben- avraham and j. kohler , j. stat . phys . * 65 * , 839 ( 1992 ) ; e. v. albano , j. phys .
a * 25 * , 2557 ( 1992 ) .
p. k. mohanty and d. dhar , phys .
* 89 * , 104303 ( 2002 ) ; physica a * 384 * , 34(2007 ) .
t. nagatani , jnl .
japan * 61 * , 3196 ( 1992 ) ; j. d. noh and h. park , phys .
lett . * 94 * , 145702 ( 2005 ) ; s. kwon and y. kim , phys .
e * 72 * , 066122 ( 2006 ) .
s. cornell , m. droz , r. dickman and m. c. marques , j. phys .
a : math . gen . * 24 * 5605 ( 1991 ) ; h. k. janssen , phys .
lett . * 78 * , 2890 ( 1997 ) ; j. stat .
phys.*103 * , 801 ( 2001 ) ; u. c. tuber , m. j. howard , and h. hinrichsen , phys .
. lett . * 80 * , 2165 ( 1998 ) ; j. l. cardy and u. c. tuber , phys .
lett . * 77 * , 4780 ( 1996 ) ; j. stat .
phys . * 90 * , 1 ( 1998 ) .
e. arashiro and t. tom , j. phys .
a : math . theor . *
40 * , 887 ( 2007 ) ; a. lipowski and d. lipowska , physica a * 276 * , 456 ( 2000 ) .
|
j marro dickman nonequilibrium phase transitions lattice models cambridge university press 1999 h hinrichsen advances 49 815 2000 ) m henkel hinrichsen s lbeck non - equilibrium phase transitions berlin springer 2008 grassberger phys 47 365 1982 janssen 42 151 1981 ) l cardy sugar 13 l423 1980 ) a. lipowski m. lopata phys . 60 1516(1999 ) m. basu u. gayen p k mohanty arxiv:1102.1631 a. ghosh basu chakraborti b k chakrabarti phys . 83 061130 2011 ) jensen phys . 70 1465 1993 jensen r dickman phys 48 1710 1993 ) mendes dickman henkel marques phys 27 3019 ( 1994 ) d. ben- avraham j. kohler phys . 65 839 ( 1992 ) v albano phys . 25 2557 1992 ) p k mohanty d. dhar phys 89 104303 2002 ) physica 384 34(2007 ) nagatani japan 61 3196 1992 ) noh h park phys . 94 145702 2005 ) s kwon kim . 72 066122 2006 ) s cornell droz dickman marques phys . math 24 5605 ( 1991 ) janssen . 78 2890 ( 1997 ) stat . 801 ( 2001 ) u c. tuber howard hinrichsen phys . 80 2165 ( 1998 ). cardy c tuber phys . 77 4780 ( 1996 ) stat . phys . 90 1 1998 ) arashiro t tom phys . math theor 40 887 ( 2007 ) a. lipowski d. lipowska physica 276 456 ( 2000 )
| 0.131958
| 826
| 446
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,513
|
a new type of dark matter ( dm ) theories are proposed in the light of the standard model ( sm ) singlet scalar @xmath0 which is responsible for the diphoton excess at the lhc run 2 . in the so - called @xmath0-portal dm models , after taking into account the lhc constraints and dm direct detection limits , we show that in the perturbative framework dm as either a sm singlet scalar or dirac fermion can be allowed in a wide mass range between 400 gev and 3 tev .
the dm can be directly detected in sm multi - jets and missing energy .
|
recently , a diphoton signal excess at 750 gev was reported in the data of large hadron collider ( lhc ) run 2 with @xmath1 collisions at energy @xmath2 tev @xcite .
it can be explained by a sm singlet @xmath0 , with production cross section @xcite , @xmath3 the local significance of this excess is about 3.9 @xmath4 and 2.6 @xmath4 for atlas and cms , respectively , and it was not seen in the data of lhc run 1 with @xmath5 tev @xcite .
although no excesses in @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 , dilepton and dijet channels @xcite were observed yet both in the old data of run 1 and the first data of lhc run 2 , this bump has stimulated great interests . in this paper , we consider the interest of building connections between the sm singlet scalar @xmath0 responsible for the diphoton excess and weakly - interacting massive dm models . inspired by the construction of sm higgs - portal dm models @xcite , in which the dm communicates with the sm particles via the higgs mediator , we propose @xmath0-portal dm model by replacing the higgs scalar with @xmath0 . for discussions about dm roles in diphoton excess in eq.([excess ] ) ,
@xcite .
our construction of @xmath0-portal dm obviously differs from the higgs - portal dm models due to obviously different mediator scalar mass and yukawa coupling .
but they indeed share a common feature , i.e. , they are both effective theories at the electroweak ( ew ) scale .
this paper is organized as follows . in sec .
[ sec2 ] , we define our model introduce model parameters . in sec
. [ sec3 ] , we consider the constraints on @xmath9-sector from diphoton excess in eq.([excess ] ) and 8-tev limits at lhc .
in particular , parameter space should be consistent with the 8-tev @xmath10 limit .
dm of type either a sm singlet scalar or dirac fermion are both addressed . in sec .
[ sec4 ] , we consider the constraints on dm - sector from dm relic abundance @xcite and direct detection limits @xcite . in sec . [ sec4 ]
we add a few comments on dm direct detection at lhc run 2 . finally , we conclude in sec .
we assume that the effective theory of new physics model includes a scalar @xmath0 responsible for the diphoton excess , a fermion @xmath9 charged under sm gauge group @xmath11 with electric charge @xmath12 in unit of @xmath13 , and a sm singlet scalar dm ( @xmath14 ) or a sm singlet fermion dm ( @xmath15 ) . the tev - scale effective lagrangian @xmath16 for this model is given by , @xmath17 where @xmath18 we identify @xmath19 gev and ew scale @xmath20 gev .
the yukawa coupling @xmath21 in the case for scalar dm has been normalized to a dimensionless parameter . for either a scalar or fermion
dm there are four following model parameters in eq.([lag ] ) , @xmath22 similar to higgs - portal singlet scalar dm @xcite , a @xmath23 parity , under which @xmath14 is odd and the others are even , is employed to keep dm stable .
instead of writing the interactions between @xmath0 and gluons and photons via operators with mass dimension five , in ( [ lag ] ) we consider an explicit realization via fermion @xmath9 . into vector - like quark models .
we temporarily assume that those fermions ignored here are not relevant for our study . ]
the advantage is obvious , as the number of model parameters are reduced .
see , e.g. , @xcite . .
limits in the data of lhc run 1 are shown in curves , above which regions are excluded.,width=384 ]
the decay channels for @xmath0 include @xmath24 and an extra one @xmath25 in the low mass region @xmath26 .
some of these magnitudes satisfy @xmath27 while the others such as @xmath28 are all of the same order .
obviously , larger branching ratio @xmath29 in eq.([width ] ) can be obtained by choosing larger @xmath12 . in this paper
we simply choose the electric charge 5/3 for @xmath9 for the following facts .
at first , the dark matter phenomenology discussed in sec .
iv does not significantly affected by the choice on electric charge slightly bigger than @xmath30 for @xmath9 as favored by the diphoton excess at 750 gev .
secondly , those results arising from electric charge @xmath30 in sec.iv are useful reference for the case where @xmath9 is also charged under @xmath31 singlet , the electric charge for @xmath9 can be alternatively chosen bigger than @xmath30 .
see our previous work @xcite for relevant discussion .
in contrast , if @xmath9 is further charged under @xmath32 , the mass region @xmath33 gev has been excluded by the 8-tev lhc data @xcite for the assumption @xmath34 .
similarly , see ref .
@xcite for lhc lower mass bounds for @xmath35 . ] . in the setting on small other than large decay width for @xmath0 ,
@xmath36 is restricted to be above @xmath37 .
the production cross section @xmath38 is mainly through gluon fusion , the magnitude of which depends on yukawa coupling @xmath39 and fermion mass @xmath36 .
given the fact that the decay width ratio @xmath40 is nearly fixed for the explicit choice on electric charge @xmath12 , the diphoton signal strength @xmath41 is sensitive to @xmath39 and fermion mass @xmath36 . in fig.[signal ]
the yellow band corresponds to the contours of observed diphoton signal strength , with limits in the data of lhc run 1 are shown in curves .
it indicates that the narrow region in the yellow band below the limit given by @xmath42tev can explain the diphoton excess and is consistent with the following limits @xcite at @xmath43-tev lhc simultaneously , @xmath44 it also implies that the value of @xmath39 as required is in the perturbative region for @xmath36 below 2 tev . :
feynman diagrams for dm annihilation .
@xmath45 : feynman diagram for dm - nucleon scattering cross section.,width=268 ] : feynman diagrams for dm annihilation .
@xmath45 : feynman diagram for dm - nucleon scattering cross section.,width=268 ]
in this section we take the dm view on our model parameters .
the yukawa interaction between dm and @xmath0 responsible for diphoton excess provides the @xmath46-channel annihilation @xmath47 as shown in the left panel of fig.[feynman ] .
this annihilation should account for the dm relic abundance as measured by the plank and wmap 9-year data @xcite , @xmath48 by employing micromegas @xcite we show in fig.[relic ] the contours of @xmath49 in the parameter space of @xmath21 and @xmath50 with dm either a scalar or dirac fermion for three representative choices on @xmath51 gev .
@xmath52 in fig.[relic ] shows that once @xmath53 is opened in the mass region @xmath54 , annihilation cross section significantly increases , which leads to smaller @xmath21 as required by the relic abundance in eq.([relic ] ) .
similar phenomenon occurs in the @xmath45 for dirac fermion dm , although it changes more mildly .
this difference may be due to the particular normalization we have chosen for scalar dm in eq.([lag ] ) .
the requirement of dark matter relic density as indicated by the right panel of fig.3 implies that perturbative analysis is not valid for fermion dm with mass roughly below 400 gev .
conversely , this requirement as indicated by the left panel of fig.3 implies that perturbative analysis is not valid for scalar dm with mass roughly above 2.5 tev instead . unlike the higgs - portal singlet dm model where dm - nucleon scattering proceeds via tree - level process , , in our model dm - nucleon scattering proceeds via a loop process instead
, as shown in the @xmath55 of fig.[feynman ] , where the intermediate vector boson in the @xmath55 is either sm gluon or photon . as a result , the @xmath0-nucleon scattering cross section @xmath56 is relatively suppressed in compared with a tree - level process .
fig.[si ] shows the contours of @xmath56 as function of dm mass for either scalar ( @xmath57)or dirac fermion ( @xmath55 ) dm , which clearly shows that it is consistent with all present direct detection limits .
it also implies that there is no prospect for discovery even in the further experiment at xenon1 t .
projected to the parameter space of @xmath21 and @xmath50 . @xmath52 and @xmath45 corresponds to a scalar and dirac fermion dm , respectively . in each case , we take three representative choices on @xmath51 gev .
the uncertainty for @xmath21 is due to the uncertainty of @xmath39 as shown in fig.[signal].,width=307 ] projected to the parameter space of @xmath21 and @xmath50 . @xmath52 and @xmath45 corresponds to a scalar and dirac fermion dm , respectively . in each case , we take three representative choices on @xmath51 gev .
the uncertainty for @xmath21 is due to the uncertainty of @xmath39 as shown in fig.[signal].,width=307 ] as function of dm mass for either scalar ( @xmath57)or dirac fermion ( @xmath55 ) dm for three representative choices on @xmath51 gev , which clearly show that our dm model is consistent with all present direct detection limits .
they also indicate that there is no prospect for discovery at further xenon1 t experiment .
similar to fig.[relic ] , the uncertainty for @xmath21 is due to the uncertainty of @xmath39 in fig.[signal].,width=307 ] as function of dm mass for either scalar ( @xmath57)or dirac fermion ( @xmath55 ) dm for three representative choices on @xmath51 gev , which clearly show that our dm model is consistent with all present direct detection limits .
they also indicate that there is no prospect for discovery at further xenon1 t experiment .
similar to fig.[relic ] , the uncertainty for @xmath21 is due to the uncertainty of @xmath39 in fig.[signal].,width=307 ]
the dm can be directly detected at lhc via dm pair production .
it may contribute to excess in sm multi - jets plus missing energy .
the signal strength of multi - jet process @xmath59 through gluon fusion is suppressed by many - body final states .
consider that the dm is typically in the mass range between 400 gev and 3 tev and the sm background is very large , a large luminosity is required for discovery of dm at the lhc run 2 .
this issue will be addressed elsewhere in detail @xcite .
in this paper we propose a type of new dm models , in which the scalar responsible for the diphoton excess at 13-tev lhc mediates the interactions between dm and sm . in the so - called @xmath0-portal dm models , after taking into account the lhc constraints and dm direct detection limits , we show that in the perturbative framework dm either a sm singlet scalar or dirac fermion can be allowed in a wide mass range between 400 gev and 3 tev . with high integrated luminosity ,
the dm can be directly detected in sm multi - jets and missing energy .
|
diphoton signal excess at 750 gev reported in large hadron collider lhc run 2 with @xmath1 collisions at @xmath2 tev @xcite explained by sm singlet @xmath0 production cross section @xcite local significance excess 3.9 @xmath4 and 2.6 @xmath4 for atlas cms not seen in data lhc run 1 with @xmath5 tev @xcite no excesses in @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 dilepton dijet channels @xcite observed in old data run 1 first data lhc run 2 bump stimulated interests building connections between sm singlet scalar @xmath0 diphoton excess weakly - interacting massive dm models propose @xmath0-portal dm model replacing higgs scalar with @xmath0 dm roles in diphoton excess construction-portal dm differs from different mediator scalar mass yukawa coupling common effective theories at electroweak scale paper organized define model introduce parameters consider constraints on @xmath9-sector from diphoton excess 8-tev limits at lhcparameter space consistent with 8-tev @xmath10 limit sm singlet scalar or dirac fermion addressed consider constraints on dm - sector relic abundance @xcite direct detection limits comments on dm direct detection at lhc run 2 conclude effective theory new model includes scalar @xmath0 diphoton excess fermion @xmath9 sm gauge group @xmath11 electric charge @xmath12 @xmath13 sm singlet scalar dm @xmath14 or sm singlet fermion dm @xmath15 ) tev - scale effective lagrangian @xmath16 given by @xmath17 @xmath19 gev ew scale @xmath20 gev yukawa coupling @xmath21 scalar dm normalized to dimensionless parameter scalar or fermion dm four model parameters @xmath22 - singlet scalar dm @xmath23 parity @xmath14 odd even keep dm stable interactions between @xmath0 gluons photons mass dimension explicit realization via fermion @xmath9 vector - like quark models fermions ignored not relevant study advantage number model parameters reducedlimits data lhc run 1 shown in curves above regions excluded decay channels @xmath0 include @xmath24 extra @xmath25 low mass region @xmath26 some magnitudes satisfy @xmath27 others @xmath28 same order larger branching ratio @xmath29 choosing larger @xmath12 choose electric charge 5/3 for @xmath9 dark matter phenomenology affected by choice electric charge bigger results from electric charge @xmath30 useful @xmath9 charged under @xmath31 singlet electric charge chosen bigger if @xmath9 charged under @xmath32 mass region @xmath33 gev excluded by 8-tev lhc data for assumption @xmath34 see for lower mass bounds for @xmath35 small decay width @xmath0 @xmath36 restricted above @xmath37 production cross section @xmath38 through gluon fusion magnitude depends on yukawa coupling @xmath39 fermion mass @xmath36 decay width ratio @xmath40 fixed for choice electric charge @xmath12 diphoton signal strength @xmath41 sensitive to @xmath39 fermion mass @xmath36 figyellow band corresponds diphoton signal strength limits data lhc run 1 shown in curves narrow region yellow band below limit @xmath42tev diphoton excess consistent with limits @xmath43-tev @xmath44 implies value of @xmath39 in perturbative region for @xmath36 below 2 tev feynman diagrams for dm annihilation @xmath45 dm - nucleon scattering cross section dm view on model parameters yukawa interaction between dm @xmath0 diphoton excess provides @xmath46-channel annihilation @xmath47 left panel annihilation for dm relic abundance measured by plank wmap 9-year data @xmath48 fig. contours of @xmath49 in parameter space @xmath21 @xmath50 with dm scalar or dirac fermion for three choices on @xmath51 @xmath53 opened in mass region @xmath54 annihilation cross section increases leads to smaller @xmath21 relic abundance similar in @xmath45 for dirac fermion dm changes mildly difference due to normalization for scalar dm eq.requirement of dark matter relic density right panel fig.3 implies perturbative analysis valid for fermion dm mass below 400 gev requirement left panel implies valid for scalar dm mass above 2.5 tev unlike higgs - portal singlet dm model - nucleon scattering tree - level process our model loop process in @xmath55 intermediate vector boson is either sm gluon or photon @xmath0-nucleon scattering cross section @xmath56 suppressed fig. shows contours of @xmath56 function of dm mass for scalar dirac fermion dm consistent with direct detection limits implies no prospect for discovery further experiment at xenon1 t projected to @xmath21 @xmath50 @xmath52 @xmath45 to scalar dirac fermion dm three representative choices on @xmath51 gev uncertainty for @xmath21 due to uncertainty of @xmath39 in fig. @xmath52 @xmath45 to scalar and dirac fermion dm three representative choices on @xmath51 gevuncertainty @xmath21 due to @xmath39 fig. function dm mass scalar @xmath57)or dirac fermion ) dm three choices @xmath51 gev dm model consistent with direct detection limits no prospect discovery at further xenon1 t experiment uncertainty @xmath21 due @xmath39 function dm mass scalar dm three choices @xmath51 gev dm model consistent with direct detection limits no prospect discovery further xenon1 t experiment uncertainty @xmath21 due uncertainty @xmath39 dm detected at lhc via dm pair production contribute to excess in sm multi - jets missing energy signal strength of multi - jet process @xmath59 suppressed by many - body final states dm mass range between 400 gev and 3 tev sm background large large luminosity required for discovery dm at lhc run 2 issue addressed propose new dm models scalar responsible for diphoton excess at 13-tev lhc mediates interactions between dm sm@xmath0-portal dm models lhc constraints dm detection limits perturbative framework dm sm singlet scalar dirac fermion allowed mass range 400 gev 3 tev high luminosity dm detected sm multi - jets missing energy
| 0.432498
| 2,660
| 1,364
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,514
|
properties of active colloids of circle swimmers are reviewed . as an particular example of active magnetic colloids
the magnetotactic bacteria under the action of a rotating magnetic field is considered .
the relation for a diffusion coefficient due to the random switching of the direction of rotation of their rotary motors is derived on the basis of the master equation .
the obtained relation is confirmed by the direct numerical simulation of random trajectory of a magnetotactic bacterium under the action of the poisson type internal noise due to the random switching of rotary motors .
the results obtained are in qualitative and quantitative agreement with the available experimental results and allows one to determine the characteristic time between the switching events of a rotary motor of the bacterium .
active systems magnetotactic bacteria circle swimmer diffusion properties of random trajectories of so - called circle swimmers have been studied by various groups of researchers @xcite .
various kinds of these swimmers and their properties have been investigated .
effective diffusion coefficients of circle swimmers subjected to thermal noise are calculated in @xcite .
circle swimmers with an asymmetric l - shape self - propelling due to the self - phoresis at illumination by light were synthesized and studied in @xcite .
circular dynamics of slightly bent self - propelling rods switching their direction of circulation due to thermal fluctuations are studied in @xcite .
a specific example of circle swimmers is magnetotactic bacteria , which in a rotating magnetic field in the absence of noise move along circular trajectories , if the frequency of the rotating field is less than a critical value @xcite .
a random walk of the centers of circular trajectory is observed due to random switching of the direction of rotation of their flagella @xcite .
here the properties of this random walk are studied on the basis of the master equation @xcite for the probability density distribution function @xmath0 of position of the bacterium @xmath1 and direction of its magnetic moment @xmath2 .
bacteria moves in @xmath2 direction or opposite to it .
it is illustrated that this method may be applied also to circle swimmers of other types .
|
let us consider magnetotactic bacteria which move in the direction of their magnetic moment @xmath2 or opposite to it due to random switching of the direction of rotation of a rotary motor .
since in the synchronous regime the magnetic moment rotates synchronously with the field , so does the velocity of the bacterium .
the master equation accounting for a random switching rate @xmath3 of the direction of a rotary motor rotation reads @xmath4 taking into account that @xmath5 , where @xmath6 , eq . ( [ eq:1 ] ) may be rewritten for the two - dimensional case in a more simple way as follows @xmath7 there are several possible ways to analyse the properties of random trajectories of these circle swimmers .
a simple approach is based on the derivation from ( [ eq:1a ] ) of a closed set of equations for several moments characterizing their distribution @xmath8 .
it reads @xmath9 in order to derive a set of equations ( 3 ) the condition of normalization @xmath10 and the relation @xmath11 are used . since the set ( 3 )
is closed it is possible to obtain an analytical solution for @xmath12 , which characterizes the random process of the particle diffusion . the stationary solution for the moments @xmath13 reads @xmath14 @xmath15 relations ( [ eq:4],[eq:5 ] ) , as a result , give @xmath16 taking into account 2d character of particle motion , absence of cross - correlation @xmath17 in the stationary case and @xmath18 due to the symmetry , for the diffusion coefficient we have @xmath19 in the limit @xmath20 we have @xmath21 introducing as a characteristic time of tumbling @xmath22 relation ( [ eq:8 ] ) reads @xmath23 it coincides with the expression for the diffusion coefficient of tumbling bacterium @xcite with @xmath24 , where @xmath25 is angle by which the bacterium changes direction of motion after a tumbling event . since in our case direction of the bacterium motion changes to the opposite we have @xmath24 . in the limit of high frequency for the diffusion coefficient we have @xmath26 , where @xmath27 is the radius of a circular trajectory , which coincides with the expression of the diffusion coefficient in the elementary theory of brownian motion @xcite .
we should remark that besides the diffusion due to random switching of the rotary motor of the bacterium there is also thermal noise due to fluctuating forces and torques .
this problem is considered in @xcite . in @xcite calculation
is carried out by using time - correlation functions .
we will illustrate further that the diffusion coefficients of torqued swimmers may be calculated in a similar fashion as above on the basis of the fokker - planck equation for the joint distribution function of the position and orientation of the swimmer @xmath28 : @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the operator of infinitesimal rotations and @xmath31 and @xmath32 are translational and rotational diffusion coefficients respectively . in 3d case
the following closed set of equations for the moments may be obtained @xmath33 in the stationary case we have @xmath34 this gives , in agreement with @xcite , @xmath35 and @xmath36 similar to ( 14 ) relation in 2d case , up to our knowledge , was for the first time obtained in @xcite .
we see that the frequency dependence of the diffusion coefficient is similar to the one for the magnetotactic bacterium under the action of the poisson like noise .
the role of the switching rate @xmath3 is determined in this case by the rotary diffusion coefficient of the swimmer @xmath32 .
taking for the rotational drag coefficient of the bacterium the value @xmath37 @xcite we may estimate the characteristic switching rate due to the rotational diffusion as @xmath38 , which is much less than expected due to the switching of the rotary motors of a bacterium .
this shows that random trajectories observed in @xcite of bacteria in a rotating field are due to the random switching of rotary motors and not due to the random thermal noise .
another evidence for this comes from direct comparison of the trajectory observed in the experiment ( see fig.11 in @xcite ) and trajectory obtained numerically as described in @xcite and shown in fig.1 .
parameters used in generating the trajectory are similar to those of the experiment .
trajectory length is @xmath39 , @xmath40 . from the experiment estimated radius of rotation is @xmath41 and diffusion coefficient @xmath42 which give @xmath43 and , according to ( [ eq:7 ] ) , @xmath44 . concerning the relation ( [ eq:7 ] )
we may point out that for given frequency of rotating field @xmath45 the diffusion coefficient has a maximum at definite switching rate @xmath46 .
thus a bacterium , which is in unfavorable conditions and is confined to a definite area by a rotating field has a possibility to increase its diffusion coefficient for seeking more favorable conditions by adopting the switching rate of the rotary motor
. it may be worth to notice that optimal switching rate given by the relation @xmath46 in the case of a rotating field with frequency @xmath47 equals to @xmath48 - a value close to the characteristic switching and tumbling events of bacteria @xcite .
it is interesting to remark that similar mechanism of the enhancement of the diffusion coefficient of marine bacteria was considered in @xcite where it was illustrated that time modulation of the swimming velocity may increase the diffusion coefficient by an order of magnitude .
maximum of the diffusion coefficient for the centers of spiral waves in dependence on the correlation time of random noise was found in @xcite .
the set of equations ( 3 ) allows us to consider the transitory regime of establishment of the brownian diffusion .
seeking the solution exponential in time @xmath49 of linear homogeneous set of equations @xmath50 we obtain @xmath51 . as a result
the solution for these moments satisfying zero initial conditions reads @xmath52 and @xmath53 by integration we find the mean square displacement @xmath54 at @xmath55 for the mean square displacement we have @xmath56 at small times the motion of the bacterium is ballistic @xmath57 .
in the synchronous regime tangent vector @xmath58 to the trajectory , which we choose along the magnetic moment of a bacterium , rotates with the angular velocity of the field : @xmath59 where @xmath60 . since , according to the frenet equation , @xmath61 and @xmath62 ( the bacterium moves along its magnetic moment or opposite to it ) we have @xmath63 and thus @xmath64 .
it means that at constant rotary motor rotation direction the trajectory is an arc of circle with radius @xmath65 .
the radius vector of the curvature center of the trajectory is @xmath66 .
it means that the position of the curvature center jumps by @xmath67 at the switching of the rotary motor . for numerical implementation of the algorithm it is useful to introduce complex notations @xmath68 and @xmath69 . in dimensionless form
the equations for a random trajectory of the bacterium read ( @xmath70 ) @xmath71 for numerical simulation of the trajectory a set of switching times @xmath72 distributed according to the poisson law @xmath73 are introduced . at time moments @xmath74 the random variable @xmath75 equal to @xmath76 changes the sign .
the generated trajectory is used to obtain diffusion coefficient @xmath31 as a function of the switching rate @xmath3 .
two examples of computed mean square displacement as a function of time difference is shown in fig.2 .
it is evident that the relationship is not linear at small times .
slope of the best - fit line at large times is an estimate of @xmath77 . the estimated diffusion coefficient for a range of @xmath3 values is shown in fig.3 . all trajectories used consist of @xmath78 switches of swimming direction .
the results are in very good agreement with ( [ eq:7 ] ) . in @xcite , when considering sperm trajectory curvature fluctuations @xmath79 , it is found that they introduce effective diffusion coefficient given by ( @xmath80 ) @xmath81 where @xmath82 is a power spectrum of the curvature fluctuations , found at the circulation frequency @xmath83 . in our case of a synchronous regime of motion of bacteria in a rotating field @xmath84 is equal to the frequency of the rotating field @xmath45 .
the relation ( [ eq:20 ] ) is in agreement with the numerical simulation results .
taking into account that for the poisson process the probability of even number of switching events in time @xmath85 is @xmath86 and the probability of odd number of switching events is @xmath87 for the curvature time correlation function we have @xmath88 and the power spectrum of curvature fluctuations is @xmath89 relations ( [ eq:20 ] ) and ( [ eq:21 ] ) give the relation ( [ eq:7 ] ) .
it should be noticed that according to @xcite the relation ( [ eq:21 ] ) has a more broad context than a particular example considered here and includes the noise in chemotactic signalling system and other .
analysis of the random trajectories of the circle swimmers - the magnetotactic bacteria shows that experimentally observed random trajectories of bacteria are caused by the internal noise of rotary motors and are not due to the thermal fluctuations .
derived on the basis of the master equation relation for the diffusion coefficient is in an excellent agreement with the results of numerical simulations and allows one to determine the characteristic rate of the random switching events of rotary motors from the available experimental data .
authors acknowledge funding from the european union though the fp7 project bio2man4mri ( grant no.245542 ) .
ac is thankful to organizers of the 2nd french - brazilian meeting on nanoscience , nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology ( december 2012 , brazil ) .
15 s.ebbens , r.a.l.jones , a.j.ryan , r.golestanian , and j.r.howse , _ phys.rev.e _
_ 82 _ 015304(r ) ( 2010 ) m.sandoval , _
_ 87 _ 032708 ( 2013 ) f.kummel , b.ten hagen , r.witkowski , i.buttinoni , g.volpe , h.lowen , and c.bechniger , arxiv:1302.5787v ( 23 february 2013 ) b.m.friedrich , f.julicher , _ new journal of physics _ _ 10 _ 123025 ( 2008 ) d.takagi , a.b.braunschweig , j.zhang , and m.j.shelley , _ phys.rev.lett .
_ _ 110 _ 038301 ( 2013 ) k.erglis , qi wen , v.ose , a.zeltins , a.sharipo , p.a.janmey , and a.cebers , _ biophysical journal _
_ 93 _ 1402 ( 2007 ) a.cebers , _ jmmm _ _ 323 _ 279 ( 2011 ) k.martens , l.angelani , r.di leonardo , and l.bocquet , _ eur.phys.j.e _ _ 35 _ 84 ( 2012 ) h.berg , _ random walks in biology _ , _ princeton university press _ , ( 1983 ) ph.nelson , _ biological physics _ , _ w.h.freeman and company , new york _ ( 2003 ) c.douarche , a.buguin , h.safman , and a.libchaber , _ phys.rev.lett . _
_ 102 _ 198101 ( 2009 ) e.lauga , _ phys.rev.lett . _
_ 106 _ 178101 ( 2011 ) i. sendifia - nadal , s.alonso , v.perez-munuzuri , m.gomez-gesteira , v.perez-villar , l.ramirez-piscina , j.casademunt , j.m.sancho , and f.sagues , _ phys.rev.lett . _
_ 84 _ 2734 ( 2000 )
|
consider magnetotactic bacteria move direction magnetic moment or opposite due random switching direction rotation rotary motor synchronous regime magnetic moment rotates synchronously with field velocity bacterium master equation random switching rate @xmath3 rotary motor rotation reads @xmath4 @xmath5 rewritten two - dimensional case @xmath7 several ways analyse random trajectories circle swimmers simple approach derivation from eq:1a closed set equations moments characterizing distribution @xmath8 @xmath9 derive equations 3 condition of normalization @xmath10 relation @xmath11 used set 3 closed obtain solution for @xmath12 random process particle diffusion stationary solution moments @xmath13 reads @xmath14 @xmath15 relations ( eq:4],:5 ] @xmath16 particle motion absence cross - correlation @xmath17 @xmath18 symmetry diffusion coefficient @xmath19 limit @xmath20 @xmath21 characteristic time of tumbling @xmath22 relation eq:8 reads @xmath23 coincides with expression diffusion coefficient tumbling bacterium @xmath24 @xmath25 angle bacterium changes direction motion after tumbling eventbacterium motion changes opposite @xmath24 high frequency diffusion coefficient @xmath26 @xmath27 radius circular trajectory coincides with diffusion coefficient elementary theory brownian motion @xcite besides diffusion switching rotary motor bacterium thermal noise due fluctuating forces torques problem considered in @xcite calculation time - correlation functions diffusion coefficients torqued swimmers calculated fokker - planck equation joint distribution function position orientation swimmer @xmath28 : @xmath29 @xmath30 operator infinitesimal rotations @xmath31 @xmath32 translational rotational diffusion coefficients 3d case closed set equations moments obtained @xmath33 stationary case @xmath34 @xcite @xmath35 @xmath36 similar ( 14 ) relation 2d case first obtained @xcite frequency dependence diffusion coefficient similar magnetotactic bacterium poisson like noise switching rate @xmath3 determined by rotary diffusion coefficient swimmer @xmath32 rotational drag coefficient bacterium @xmath37 @xcite estimate characteristic switching rate due rotational diffusion @xmath38 less than expected switching rotary motors bacteriumshows random trajectories in @xcite of bacteria rotating field due to switching rotary motors not thermal noise evidence from comparison of trajectory experiment fig.11 @xcite and trajectory obtained numerically in @xcite fig.1 parameters generating trajectory similar to experiment trajectory length @xmath39, @xmath40 estimated radius of rotation @xmath41 diffusion coefficient @xmath42 @xmath43 and @xmath44 for frequency rotating field @xmath45 diffusion coefficient maximum at switching rate @xmath46 bacterium in unfavorable conditions confined diffusion coefficient by adopting switching rate rotary motor optimal switching rate relation @xmath46 rotating field with frequency @xmath47 equals to @xmath48 close to characteristic switching tumbling events bacteria @xcite similar mechanism enhancement diffusion coefficient marine bacteria in @xcite time modulation swimming velocity increase diffusion coefficient maximum diffusion coefficient for centers of spiral waves on correlation time random noise found in @xcite set equations ( 3 ) transitory regime of establishment brownian diffusionsolution time @xmath49 linear equations @xmath50 obtain @xmath51 solution moments zero conditions reads @xmath52 @xmath53 mean square displacement @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 small times motion bacterium ballistic @xmath57 synchronous regime tangent vector @xmath58 trajectory magnetic moment rotates with angular velocity field @xmath59 @xmath60 frenet equation @xmath61 @xmath62 bacterium moves magnetic moment @xmath63 @xmath64 constant rotary motor rotation trajectory arc circle radius @xmath65 radius vector curvature center @xmath66 position curvature center jumps @xmath67 at switching rotary motor numerical implementation complex notations @xmath68 @xmath69 equations random trajectory bacterium read @xmath70 ) @xmath71 switching times @xmath72 poisson law @xmath73 time moments @xmath74 random variable @xmath75 equal @xmath76 changes sign generated trajectory diffusion coefficient @xmath31 function switching rate @xmath3 examples computed mean square displacement time difference fig.2 relationship not linear at small times slope best - fit line large times estimate @xmath77estimated diffusion coefficient @xmath3 values fig.3 trajectories @xmath78 switches swimming results with [ eq:7 ] ) @xcite sperm trajectory curvature fluctuations @xmath79 introduce diffusion coefficient @xmath80 ) @xmath81 @xmath82 power spectrum curvature fluctuations circulation frequency @xmath83 synchronous motion bacteria rotating field @xmath84 equal to frequency @xmath45 relation ( [ eq:20 ] ) numerical simulation results probability even switching events @xmath85 @xmath86 odd @xmath87 curvature time correlation function @xmath88 power spectrum curvature fluctuations @xmath89 relations ( [ eq:20 ] ) [ eq:21 ] ) relation ( [ eq:7 ] ) @xcite relation ( [ eq:21 ] ) broad context includes noise chemotactic signalling system analysis random trajectories circle swimmers magnetotactic bacteria caused by internal noise rotary motors not thermal fluctuations master equation relation diffusion coefficient with numerical simulations determine characteristic rate random switching events rotary motors authors acknowledge funding european union fp7 project bio2man4mri grant no.245542 )thankful organizers 2nd french - brazilian meeting nanoscience nanobiotechnology december 2012 brazil s.ebbens.l.jones.j.ryan.golestanian j.howse.rev.e 82 015304 2010.sandoval 87 _ 032708 2013 f.kummel.ten hagen.witkowski.buttinoni g.volpe h.lowen c.bechniger arxiv:1302.5787v 23 february 2013.friedrich f.julicher new journal 10 123025 2008 d.takagi.braunschweig j.zhang m.j.shelley.rev.lett 110 038301 2013 k.erglis qi wen v.ose a.zeltins.sharipo p.janmey.cebers biophysical journal 93 1402 2007.cebers 323 _ 279 2011 k.martens l.angelani.di leonardo l.bocquet eur.phys.j.e 35 84 2012 h.berg random walks biology princeton university press 1983 ph.nelson biological physics w.h.freeman company new york 2003 c.douarche a.buguin h.safman.libchaber phys.rev.lett 102 198101 2009 e.lauga.rev106 178101 2011 sendifia - nadal.alonso.perez-munuzuri.gomez-gesteira-villar.ramirez-piscina j.casademunt.sancho f.sagues.rev.lett 84 2734 ( 2000 )
| 0.432599
| 2,643
| 1,452
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,517
|
we propose an iterative finite element method for solving non - linear hydromagnetic and steady euler s equations .
some three - dimensional computational tests are given to confirm the convergence and the high efficiency of the method .
|
the understanding of plasma equilibria is one of the most important problems in magnetohydrodynamics and arises in several fields including solar physics and thermonuclear fusion .
such an equilibria is often governed by the well known steady hydromagnetic equations @xmath0 which describe the balance of the lorentz force by pressure . here
@xmath1 and @xmath2 are respectively the magnetic field and the pressure .
notice that system ( [ eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] ) is quite similar to steady inviscid fluid equations @xmath3 this analogy is due to the vectorial identity @xmath4 system of equations ( [ eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] ) must be completed with some boundary conditions on @xmath1 and @xmath2 .
physical considerations suggest to prescribe the boundary normal field component : @xmath5 where @xmath6 satisfies the compatibility condition @xmath7 due to the equation @xmath8 . defining the inflow boundary as @xmath9 one can also prescribe the normal component @xmath10 of the current density and the pressure @xmath2 on @xmath11 @xmath12
@xmath13 one can notice that if the pressure is neglected , equations ( [ eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] ) become @xmath14 equation ( [ eqn : fff ] ) means that the magnetic field and its curl , which represents the current density , are everywhere aligned .
the magnetic field is said _ beltrami _ or _ force - free _ ( ff ) . a usual way to tackle the problem ( [ eqn : fff ] ) + ( [ eqn : div2 ] ) consists to rewrite equation ( [ eqn : fff ] ) into the form @xmath15 where @xmath16 is a scalar function which can be a constant function or can depend on @xmath17 . in the former
, the @xmath1 field is said linear ff . in the latter ,
it is said non linear . + some partial results concerning existence of 3d solutions of equations ( [ eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] ) in bounded domains are given in @xcite and @xcite .
linear force - free - fields were studied in @xcite . for the existence of non - linear ones the reader can refer to @xcite , @xcite .
the numerical solving of equations ( [ eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] ) and equations ( [ eqn : fff])+([eqn : div2 ] ) is of importance in magnetohydrodynamics studies and in solar physics . as it is known , the reconstruction of the coronal magnetic field has is of a great utility in observational and theoretical studies of the magnetic structures in the solar atmosphere . in this paper
, we propose an iterative process for solving these equations ( section [ sec:2 ] ) .
a finite element method is proposed for solving each one of the arising problems .
our objective here is to expose an iterative method for solving the non - linear equations ( [ eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] ) in a bounded and simply - connected domain .
the starting idea of the method consists to split the current density @xmath18 into the sum @xmath19 where the vector field @xmath20 is collinear to @xmath1 , while @xmath21 is perpendicular to @xmath1 .
the problem is decomposed formally into a curl - div system on @xmath22 and two first order hyperbolic equations on @xmath23 and @xmath24 .
+ more precisely , writing @xmath25 where @xmath26 is a scalar function and taking the divergence of ( [ omega123 ] ) , gives @xmath27 notice that the pressure satisfies a similar equation since @xmath28 equation ( [ eqn : ms ] ) becomes @xmath29 which means that @xmath30 if @xmath31 . in consideration of these remarks
, we are going now to propose an iterative process to solve non - linear systems ( [ eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] ) . in this process the transport equation ( [ eqn : mu ] ) is perturbed by adding an artificial reaction term .
namely , we construct a sequence @xmath32 as follows : * the starting guess @xmath33 is chosen as the irrotational field associated to @xmath6 defined by @xmath34 this is a usual problem which can be reduced to a scalar neumann problem since the domain is simply - connected .
* for all @xmath35 , @xmath36 is solution of the system @xmath37 where @xmath38 is a small parameter and @xmath39 . * for all @xmath35 , @xmath40 and @xmath41 , where @xmath42 satisfies @xmath43 here @xmath44 and @xmath45 is a small parameter .
* for all @xmath35 , @xmath46 , with @xmath47 solution of @xmath48 where @xmath49 while @xmath50 is solution of the laplace problem @xmath51 notice that the appearance of the correction term @xmath52 is due to the fact that @xmath53 is not zero in general .
+ the convergence of this iterative process is not an easy matter .
we conjecture that it converges if @xmath54 is sufficiently small and @xmath55 in @xmath56 for some constant @xmath57 .
nevertheless , in the case of linear force - free fields ( in that case the algorithm is simplified since at each iteration @xmath58 , @xmath59 and @xmath42 is a fixed real ) boulmezaoud and amari @xcite proved that this process is super - convergent .
the proof of convergence in the general case is not given and remains an open question .
+ notice that the same algorithm can be used for computing linear or non - linear force - free fields which are solutions of ( [ eqn : div2])+([eqn : fff2 ] ) , provided that the computation of the pressure @xmath36 and the vector field @xmath60 are dropped .
here we give a short description of the finite elements methods we use for solving problems arising in the iterative process exposed above .
observe first that at each iteration of the algorithm one should solve two problems : + ( a ) a reaction - convection problem of the form : _ find @xmath61 solution of _
@xmath62 ( b ) a vector potential problem : _ find the pair @xmath63 satisfying _ @xmath64 we begin with the approximation of ( [ eqn : hyperbolic ] ) . it is well known that the direct application of a galerkin finite elements method to the singularly perturbed problem ( [ eqn : hyperbolic ] ) may lead to the appearance of spurious oscillations and instabilities . in the two last decades
, several methods were proposed to remove this drawback ( especially in the two dimensional case ) . among these methods
, one can recall the _ streamline diffusion _ method ( see brookes and hughes @xcite , see also , e. g. , johnson et _ al . _
@xcite ) , the _ discontinuous _ galerkin method ( see lesaint @xcite ) and _ bubble functions _ methods ( see , e. g. , brezzi et _ al . _ @xcite ) . here
we shall use the method of streamline diffusion .
thus , let us consider a family of regular triangulations @xmath65 of @xmath56 .
the discrete problem we consider is @xmath66 where @xmath67 here @xmath68 stands for the finite elements space @xmath69 where for each @xmath70 , @xmath71 denotes the space of polynomials of degree less or equal @xmath72 .
+ one can prove that the problem @xmath73 has a unique solution @xmath74 when @xmath75 .
moreover , if @xmath76 for some constant @xmath77 and if @xmath78 and @xmath79 for some @xmath80 , then @xmath81 where @xmath82 + now , we deal with the approximation of the curl - div system ( [ eqn : systemb ] ) , which can be dispatched into two problems : a variational problem ( @xmath83 ) in terms of @xmath84 and the fictitious unknown @xmath85 , and laplace equation ( [ eqn : lap_cor ] ) in terms of @xmath86 .
we only deal with the approximation of @xmath84 , since we shall see that the computation of the @xmath86 is useless .
denote by @xmath87 the space @xmath88 equipped with its usual norm .
the statement of problem ( [ eqn : systemb ] ) suggests the use of an @xmath87 approximation .
define @xmath89 the space @xmath90 let @xmath91 , @xmath92 two finite - dimensional subspaces and set @xmath93 we make the following assumptions @xmath94 @xmath95 the discrete version of problem ( [ eqn : systemb ] ) writes @xmath96 according to amrouche and _
@xcite , the problem @xmath97 has one and only one solution @xmath98 with @xmath99 , and @xmath100 a simple manner for constructing the spaces @xmath101 and @xmath102 is to use the @xmath103 conforming elements of ndelec @xcite ( see amrouche and _ al . _ ) . in that case , the following estimate holds @xmath104 .
+ an important feature of the discrete system @xmath97 is that only the discrete vector field @xmath105 is really unknown . actually , we know that @xmath106
. this property can be exploited from a practical viewpoint to reduce the discrete system to a smaller one by eliminating @xmath107 . in term of matrices ,
the system writes @xmath108 where @xmath109 is a symmetric and positive square matrix ( @xmath109 is not definite neither invertible ) .
we can state the following [ matrix_lemma ] let @xmath110 be a square positive , definite and symmetric matrix having the same size as @xmath111 .
then , the pair @xmath112 is solution of ( [ eqn : syst ] ) if and only if @xmath113 and @xmath114 is solution of @xmath115 in lemma [ matrix_lemma ] , the matrix @xmath109 and the rhs @xmath116 are not arbitrary . indeed , if @xmath117 denotes the matrix of the operator @xmath118 , then necessarily @xmath119 and @xmath120 .
these identities are the discrete counterpart of the continuous relations @xmath121 and @xmath122 .
a serious advantage of the new system ( [ eqn : dec_syst ] ) comparing with ( [ eqn : syst ] ) is that number of unknowns is reduced .
in this last section , we expose some computational results we obtain with a 3d code .
this code use the iterative method and the finite elements discretization exposed above to solve problem ( [ eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] ) and problem ( [ eqn : fff2])+([eqn : div2 ] ) .
we compare the exact solution and the numerical solution and we show the behavior of the errors in terms of @xmath54 .
two exact solutions are used for the tests . * * test 1 ( a non - linear force - free - field ) . * + let @xmath123 the cylindrical coordinates with respect to a point @xmath124 ( @xmath125 and @xmath126 ) .
the pair @xmath127 is given @xmath128 this is a non - linear force - free field with @xmath129 table [ tab:1 ] shows the behavior of the residue @xmath130 and the product @xmath131 versus the iteration number .
this example illustrates the superconvergence of the algorithm .
+ lll @xmath132 & @xmath133 & @xmath134 + 0 & 0.09912 & 6.740e-15 + 1 & 0.00566 & 0.06781 + 2 & 0.00036 & 0.01939 + 3 & 2.644e-05 & 0.01910 + * * test 2 : ( bennet pinch ) * .
the pair @xmath127 is given by @xmath135 in table [ tab:2 ] , the relative @xmath136 errors on @xmath1 and @xmath2 after convergence of the algorithm are shown .
these error decreases as @xmath137 , which confirms the high accuracy of the method . + lll @xmath54 & @xmath138 & @xmath139 + 0.69282 & 0.03837 & 0.08648 + 0.23094 & 0.00492 & 0.01102 + 0.13856 & 0.00191 & 0.00396 + 0.09897 & 0.00108 & 0.00201 + + alber , h.d . :
existence of three - dimensional , steady , inviscid , incompressible flows with non - vanishing vorticity .
ann . * 292 * , 493528 ( 1992 ) amrouche , c. , bernardi , c . , dauge , m. , girault , v. : vector potentials in three - dimensional non - smooth domains , math .
methods appl .
* 9 * , 823864 ( 1998 ) .
boulmezaoud , t.z . ,
amari , t. : on the existence of non - linear force - free fields in three - dimensional multiply - connected domains .
paratre dans zeitschrift fr angewandte mathematik und physik ( zamp ) .
brooks , a. , hughes , t .
r. j. : streamline upwind / petrov - galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible navier - stokes equations .
fenomech 81 , part i ( stuttgart , 1981 ) .
methods appl .
engrg . * 32 * , 199259 ( 1982 ) .
|
understanding plasma equilibria in magnetohydrodynamics solar physics thermonuclear fusion governed by steady hydromagnetic equations @xmath0 balance lorentz force by pressure @xmath1 @xmath2 are magnetic field pressure system ( eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] similar to steady inviscid fluid equations @xmath3 due to vectorial identity @xmath4 system equations div1 boundary conditions on @xmath1 @xmath2 prescribe boundary normal field component : @xmath5 @xmath6 satisfies compatibility condition @xmath7 @xmath8 inflow boundary as @xmath9 prescribe normal component @xmath10 of current density pressure @xmath2 on @xmath11 @xmath13 if pressure neglected equations ( eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] become @xmath14 magnetic field curl current density aligned magnetic field _ beltrami _ or force - free _ problem rewrite equation ( eqn : fff into form @xmath15 @xmath16 scalar function constant or on @xmath17 former @xmath1 field linear latter non linearpartial results 3d solutions equations eqn : ms])+( : div1 in bounded domains in @xcite @xcite linear force - free - fields studied in @xcite non - linear ones to @xcite numerical solving of equations eqn ms+ div1 eqn fff+ : div2 in magnetohydrodynamics solar reconstruction coronal magnetic field magnetic structures solar atmosphere iterative process solving equations finite element method proposed solving problems objective expose iterative method solving non - linear equations eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 in bounded - connected domain density @xmath18 into sum @xmath19 vector field @xmath20 collinear to @xmath1 @xmath21 perpendicular to @xmath1 problem decomposed into curl - div system on @xmath22 two first order hyperbolic equations on @xmath23 @xmath24 writing @xmath25 @xmath26 scalar function divergence of omega123 ] ) @xmath27 pressure satisfies similar equation @xmath28 becomes @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31remarks propose iterative process solve non - linear systems eqn : ms])+([eqn : div1 ] transport equation eqn : mu perturbed artificial reaction term construct sequence @xmath32 starting guess @xmath33 irrotational field @xmath6 defined @xmath34 usual problem reduced scalar neumann problem domain simply - connected @xmath35 @xmath36 solution system @xmath37 @xmath38 small parameter @xmath39 @xmath35 @xmath42 satisfies @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 small parameter @xmath35 @xmath46 @xmath47 solution @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 solution laplace problem @xmath51 correction term @xmath52 due @xmath53 not zero convergence iterative process not easy converges if @xmath54 small @xmath55 @xmath56 constant @xmath57 linear force - free fields algorithm simplified each iteration @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath42 fixed real boulmezaoud amari proved process super - convergent proof convergence general case open questionsame algorithm for computing linear or non - linear force - free fields solutions of ( [ eqn : div2])+([eqn : fff2 ] ) computation of pressure @xmath36 and vector field @xmath60 dropped short description of finite elements methods for solving problems in iterative process each iteration solve two problems reaction - convection problem @xmath61 solution vector potential problem pair @xmath63 satisfying @xmath64 approximation of ( [ eqn : hyperbolic ] ) direct application of galerkin finite elements method to perturbed problem ( [ eqn : hyperbolic ] to spurious oscillations instabilities methods proposed to remove this drawback two streamline diffusion _ method discontinuous _ galerkin method bubble functions _ methods use method of streamline diffusion consider family of regular triangulations @xmath65 of @xmath56 discrete problem is @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 stands for finite elements space @xmath69 @xmath71 denotes space of polynomials of degree less or equal @xmath72 prove problem @xmath73 unique solution @xmath74 @xmath75 if @xmath76 constant @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82 deal approximation curl - div system systemb ] ) dispatched into two problems variational problem @xmath83 ) @xmath84 fictitious unknown @xmath85 laplace equation lap_cor @xmath86 deal approximation @xmath84 computation @xmath86 useless denote @xmath87 space @xmath88 usual norm statement problem systemb suggests use @xmath87 approximation define @xmath89 space @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 finite - dimensional subspaces set @xmath93 assumptions @xmath94 @xmath95 discrete version problem systemb writes @xmath96 amrouche problem @xmath97 one solution @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 constructing spaces @xmath101 @xmath102 use @xmath103 conforming elements ndelec @xcite amrouche estimate holds @xmath104 important feature discrete system @xmath97 discrete vector field @xmath105 unknown know @xmath106 property exploited reduce discrete system smaller eliminating @xmath107system writes @xmath108 @xmath109 symmetric positive square matrix not definite invertible @xmath110 square positive definite symmetric matrix same size as @xmath111 pair @xmath112 solution of [ eqn : syst ] if @xmath113 @xmath114 solution of @xmath115 matrix @xmath109 rhs @xmath116 not arbitrary @xmath117 denotes matrix of operator @xmath118 @xmath119 @xmath120 identities discrete counterpart of continuous relations @xmath121 @xmath122 advantage new system number unknowns reduced computational results with 3d code iterative method finite elements discretization solve problem ( eqn : ms+[eqn : div1 div2 compare exact solution numerical solution show behavior errors @xmath54 two exact solutions for tests test 1 non - linear force - free field @xmath123 cylindrical coordinates point @xmath124 ( @xmath125 @xmath126 pair @xmath127 given @xmath128 non - linear force - free field with @xmath129 table tab:1 ] shows behavior of residue @xmath130 product @xmath131 versus iteration numberexample illustrates superconvergence algorithm @xmath132 + 0.09912 6.740e-15 + 1 0.00566 0.06781 + 2 0.00036 0.01939 + 3 2.644e-05 0.01910 test 2 pair @xmath127 given @xmath135 table @xmath136 errors @xmath1 after convergence error decreases @xmath137 confirms high accuracy method @xmath54 @xmath138 + 0.69282 0.03837 0.08648 + 0.23094 0.00492 0.01102 + 0.13856 0.00191 0.00396 + 0.09897 0.00108 0.00201 alber existence three - dimensional steady incompressible flows non - vanishing vorticity 493528 1992 amrouche bernardi girault vector potentials three - dimensional non - smooth domains methods 823864 1998 boulmezaoud amari non - linear force - free fields three - dimensional - connected domains zeitschrift angewandte mathematik physik brooks hughes - galerkin formulations convection dominated flows emphasis incompressible navier - stokes equations fenomech 81 stuttgart 1981methods appl engrg 32 199259 1982
| 0.500276
| 3,101
| 1,683
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,525
|
we analyze the computational costs of searches for continuous monochromatic gravitational waves emitted by rotating neutron stars orbiting a companion object . as a function of the relevant orbital parameters , we address the computational load involved in targeted searches , where the position of the source is known ;
the results are applied to known binary radio pulsars and sco - x1 .
|
the search for continuous wave ( cw ) sources rapidly rotating neutron stars ( ns ) that emit quasi - monochromatic gravitational waves ( gw s ) is one of the most computationally intensive tasks for the data analysis of gw detectors .
surveys of wide areas of the sky and/or large frequency and spin - down ranges are computationally bound ( brady et al . , 1998 ) ; the only viable strategy is to set up hierarchical algorithms , where `` coherent '' and `` incoherent '' stages are alternated in order to maximize the signal - to - noise ratio ( snr ) , based on the cpu power available ( brady and creighton , 1999 ; schutz and papa , 1999 ) .
the algorithms investigated so far deal only with _
isolated _ sources . to search for a ns orbiting a binary companion has always been considered computationally intractable , as one would need to correct also for the doppler phase shift caused by the orbital motion of the gw source around a companion object ( star , back hole , or planet ) : the maximum time of coherent integration , before the signal power is spread over more than one frequency bin , is between @xmath0 sec ( for a source like the hulse - taylor binary pulsar ) and @xmath1 sec ( for a ns with a jupiter - size planet in a 4-months period orbit ) .
this would add five more search parameters .
nonetheless , there are several important reasons for start addressing this problem at this time : ( i ) we would like to quantify what `` intractable '' means , and estimate the computational costs as a function of the search parameters ; ( ii ) the only known gw source in the high - frequency band is sco x-1 , a ns orbiting a low - mass companion ( bildsten , 1998 ) ; if our current astrophysical understanding is correct , sco x-1 would be detectable by geo600 ( in narrow - band configuration ) and ligo , at a snr@xmath2 in two years of full coherent integration ; ( iii ) the continuous monitoring of all known ns s is planned , and around 50 radio pulsars are in a binary system ; ( iv ) we are now starting the design of software codes to search for cw sources during the first science runs carried out by the detectors , but their general structure is likely to be used for several years . the aim of this contribution is to estimate the additional processing power needed to correct for the orbital motion of a cw source orbiting a binary companion , with emphasis on targeting known ns s .
in order to disentangle the extra computational costs involved in dealing with the ns orbital parameters , we will make the following assumptions : the source location in the sky is exactly known
so that one can perfectly remove the phase doppler shift due to the detector motion and the signal is monochromatic , at frequency @xmath3 . for a general blind search of ns s
possibly in binary orbits , the total computational burden would be ( roughly ) the product of the one quoted for isolated sources , times the estimate that we present here .
the gravitational waveform is given by @xmath4}\ } , \label{h}\ ] ] where @xmath5 and @xmath6 are assumed ( as usual ) constant , and @xmath7 is the doppler phase modulation induced by the orbital motion of the source around the companion ; @xmath8 it the signal parameter vector .
we assume that the orbit is keplerian , and elliptical in shape .
the doppler correction to the phase of the signal due to the orbital motion is therefore : @xmath9\ , , \label{phid}\ ] ] where @xmath10 and @xmath11 are the polar angles describing the direction to the detector , with respect to an appropriate reference frame attached to the binary system , @xmath12 is the speed of light and @xmath13 is the eccentric anomaly .
it is related to the mean angular velocity @xmath14 ( where @xmath15 is the orbital period ) and the mean anomaly @xmath16 by the kepler equation : @xmath17 , where @xmath18 is an initial phase , @xmath19 . the additional parameters on which one must launch a search are therefore five in the elliptical case , say @xmath20 , where @xmath21 , and three in the circular orbit case , say @xmath22 . as usual
, @xmath3 is not a search parameter which requires a filter mesh . a rigorous way of estimating the search costs can be worked out by approaching the data analysis through a geometrical picture ( sathyaprakash and dhurandhar , 1991 ; dhurandhar and sathyaprakash , 1994 ; balasubramanian et al . , 1996 ; owen 1996 ; brady et al . , 1998 ) : the signal is a vector in the vector space of data trains and the @xmath23-parameter family of signals traces out an @xmath23-dimensional manifold which is termed as the signal manifold . on this manifold
one introduces a proper distance and therefore a metric @xmath24 defined as the fractional loss of snr the _ mismatch _ @xmath25 caused by the wrong choice of the filter parameters . the spacing of the grid of filters is decided by the fractional loss due to the imperfect match that can be tolerated . fixing the mismatch @xmath25 , fixes the grid spacing of the filters in the parameter space @xmath26 .
the number of filters @xmath27 is then just : @xmath28^{n}\ , v_{\cal p}\,,\quad\quad\quad v_{\cal p } = \int_{{\cal p } } \sqrt{\det ||\gamma_{ij}|| } d { \vec \lambda}\ , , \label{nf}\ ] ] where @xmath29 is the proper volume , and @xmath30 for eccentric ( circular ) orbits .
the general expressions of @xmath29 and @xmath27 , with signal model given by eqs .
( [ h ] ) and ( [ phid ] ) , are very complex . nonetheless ,
in the limit of long ( @xmath31 ) and short ( @xmath32 ) observation times , with respect to the orbital period , one can obtain analytical closed form expressions which are actually quite simple .
the expansions in these two regimes agree remarkably well with the exact expression over most of the p - range , see figure 1 .
we give here some details for the circular orbit case , and just sketch the key result for eccentric orbits .
the circular orbit case is important because it provides us several insights into the problem via a comparatively easier computation ; moreover , several binary radio pulsars have effectively @xmath33 and sco x-1 is essentially in a circular orbit ; in addition , when `` blind '' searches will be implemented , it is likely that they will be restricted to ns s orbiting a companion in circular orbit , in order to keep the computational burden affordable .
the total number of filters ( for a @xmath34 mismatch ) is given by : @xmath35 where the parameter volume one needs to cover is : @xmath36 here we have ambitiously chosen parameter values that are appropriate for a ns / ns binary in a few hours orbit . notice the radically different dependence on @xmath37 in the two regimes , and the @xmath38 dependence of the computational costs . if the parameter values are known in advance with an error @xmath39 , then the number of filters reduces by a factor @xmath40 & \quad\quad ( 2\pi t / p \gg 1 ) \nonumber\\ 2.2\times
10^{-4 } \prod_{j=1}^3\,\left [ \left(\delta \lambda^j/\lambda^j\right)/10^{-2}\right ] & \quad\quad ( 2\pi
t / p \ll 1 ) \nonumber\\ \end{array } \right .
\label{g0}\ ] ] clearly , any prior information on the value of the source parameters greatly decreases the number of templates , and it is easy to check that a single - filter search can be performed if : @xmath41 in the case of eccentric orbits , the computational burden is of course much higher , but the results show a behaviour which is very similar to the one for @xmath33 . as in the previous case ,
the costs increase dramatically as the observation time covers more than @xmath42 rad of the source orbital phase . for @xmath43
one finds : @xmath44 @xmath45 contains the dependency on the eccentricity , and @xmath46 is normalized to the parameter values given in eq .
( [ vmax0 ] ) ; notice that now , with a 5-dimensional parameter space , the number of filters is proportional to @xmath47 .
we can now apply the results of the previous section to some of the known ns in binary systems which will be targeted by laser interferometers , and estimate the processing power involved _ only _ in the coherent correction of the orbital motion .
sco x-1 orbits a low - mass companion with a period @xmath48 days , in an orbit which is essentially circular ( here we will assume @xmath33 ) ; the position of the ns on the orbit is known with an error @xmath49 rad , and the projected semi - major axis is @xmath50 cm , with @xmath51 .
the uncertainties surrounding the frequency at which gw s are emitted suggest to cover a frequency band up to @xmath52 hz .
it is easy to verify that for integration times longer than @xmath53 hours , one needs to correct for the source orbital motion .
it is also evident , from the results of the previous section , that the number of filters changes dramatically when the integration time goes from @xmath54 hours to a day ; in fact : @xmath55 notice also that if one allows for possible ( small ) departures from a perfectly circular orbit , the number of templates further increases .
we analyze now the case of radio pulsars , and assume @xmath56 sec and @xmath57 .
we have considered the 44 ns s with a binary companion ( the total number of radio pulsars is 706 ) included into the catalogue by taylor et al .
( 1993,1995 ) .
seven binary radio pulsars emit at frequencies below 10 hz , and are therefore outside the observational band ; for 21 sources the parameter measurements coming from radio observations are so precise that one can simply use the quoted values of the parameters and fully correct for the orbital motion ; the remaining 16 radio pulsars require a search over a limited parameter range . for these sources , all the ns s whose spin - down values yield upper - limits on the gw amplitude which are above the sensitivity curve of all proposed detectors ( including ligo iii ) would require at most 10 templates for @xmath56 sec .
four ns s require a number of templates in the range @xmath58 ( but are well below the ligo iii sensitivity ) and eight sources , for which we do not have as yet measurements of the spin - down , would require a very substantial number of orbital filters , more than @xmath59 .
we have presented some preliminary results regarding the additional computational costs involved in the correction of the doppler phase shift induced in the cw signal of a ns orbiting a binary companion ; we have given general expressions to compute the number of filters which are required to carry out the search as a function of the mismatch , time of integration and parameter space .
a more thorough description of the issues presented here is currently in preparation , and we plan to start soon the investigation of hierarchical algorithms , that would conceivably speed up the search in a considerable way .
balasubramanian r. , sathyaprakash b. s. , dhurandhar s. v. 1996 , phys . rev .
d 53 , 3033
|
search for continuous wave sources rotating neutron stars quasi - monochromatic gravitational waves computationally intensive for surveys of wide areas large frequency spin - down ranges computationally bound ( brady 1998 ) viable strategy hierarchical algorithms coherent incoherent stages maximize signal - to - noise ratio cpu power ( brady creighton 1999 schutz papa , 1999 ) algorithms deal with isolated sources search for ns orbiting binary companion computationally intractable correct for doppler phase shift by orbital motion source companion object maximum time of coherent integration before signal power spread over frequency between @xmath0 sec for hulse - taylor binary pulsar and @xmath1 sec for ns with jupiter - size planet 4-months orbit five more search parametersreasons for addressing problem quantify intractable '' estimate computational costs search parameters only known gw source in high - frequency band is sco x-1 ns orbiting low - mass companion ( bildsten 1998 ) astrophysical understanding sco x-1 detectable by geo600 ligo snr@xmath2 in two years of full coherent integration continuous monitoring of all known ns s planned around 50 radio pulsars in binary system starting design of software codes to search for cw sources during first science runs structure likely used for several years aim estimate additional processing power for orbital motion of cw source orbiting binary companion emphasis on targeting known ns s disentangle extra computational costs orbital assumptions source location known remove phase doppler shift detector motion signal monochromatic at frequency @xmath3 for general blind search of ns s in binary orbits total computational burden product of one quoted for isolated sources estimate gravitational waveform given by @xmath4}\{h}\ @xmath5 @xmath6 constant @xmath7 doppler phase modulation orbital motion source @xmath8 signal parameter vector orbit keplerian ellipticaldoppler correction to phase signal due to orbital motion is : @xmath9\ ,{phid}\ ] ] @xmath10 @xmath11 polar angles direction to detector @xmath12 is speed of light @xmath13 eccentric anomaly related to mean angular velocity @xmath14 @xmath15 orbital period mean anomaly @xmath16 by kepler equation : @xmath17 , @xmath18 initial phase @xmath19 . additional parameters search are five in elliptical case @xmath20 @xmath21 three in circular orbit case @xmath22 @xmath3 not search parameter requires filter mesh estimating search costs data analysis through geometrical picture ( signal is vector in space data trains @xmath23-parameter family of signals traces-dimensional manifold signal manifold introduces proper distance metric @xmath24 as fractional loss of mismatch @xmath25 by wrong choice filter parameters spacing of grid of filters decided by fractional loss due to imperfect match fixing mismatch @xmath25 fixes grid spacing in parameter space @xmath26 number filters @xmath27 @xmath28^{n}\ v_{\cal p}\quad v_{\cal p } = \int_{{\cal p } \sqrt{\det |\gamma_{ij}| d \vec \lambda} \label{nf} @xmath29 proper volume @xmath30 eccentric circular orbits expressions of @xmath29 @xmath27 signal model eqs [ h ] ) phid ] ) complex long ( @xmath31 short ( @xmath32 ) observation times orbital period analytical closed form expressions simple expansions regimes agree with exact expression p - range figure 1 details circular orbit case key result eccentric orbits circular orbit provides insights problem easier computation binary radio pulsars have @xmath33 sco x-1 circular orbit blind '' searches restricted to ns s orbiting companion circular orbit computational burden affordable total number of filters @xmath34 mismatch by @xmath35 parameter volume @xmath36 chosen parameter values appropriate for ns / ns binary few hours orbit different on @xmath37 regimes @xmath38 dependence computational costsparameter values known error @xmath39 filters reduces factor @xmath40\quad\quad ( 2\pi t / p \gg 1 )\nonumber\\ 2.2\times 10^{-4 }\prod_{j=1}^3\\left\delta\lambda^j\right)/10^{-2}\right ]\quad\quad ( 2\pi t / p \ll 1 )\nonumber\\\end{array }\right{g0} prior information source parameters decreases templates single - filter search @xmath41 eccentric orbits computational burden higher results behaviour similar @xmath33 costs increase observation time covers more than @xmath42 rad source orbital phase @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 dependency eccentricity @xmath46 normalized to parameter values vmax0 ] 5-dimensional parameter space number filters proportional to @xmath47 apply results to known ns binary systems targeted laser interferometers estimate processing power coherent correction orbital motion x-1 orbits low - mass companion period @xmath48 days circular assume @xmath33 ) position ns orbit known error @xmath49 rad projected semi - major axis @xmath50 cm @xmath51 .uncertainties surrounding frequency gw s cover up to @xmath52 hz verify for integration times longer than @xmath53 hours correct for source orbital motion number of filters changes when integration time from @xmath54 hours to a day @xmath55 allows departures from circular orbit number templates increases analyze case radio pulsars assume @xmath56 sec and @xmath57 considered 44 ns s with binary companion total pulsars 706 ) catalogue by taylor et al . seven binary radio pulsars emit frequencies below 10 hz outside observational band for 21 sources parameter measurements precise use quoted values correct for orbital motion remaining 16 pulsars require search over limited parameter range ns s spin - down values yield upper - limits gw amplitude above sensitivity curve detectors require 10 templates for @xmath56 sec four ns s require templates in range @xmath58 below ligo iii sensitivity eight sources require substantial number orbital filters more than @xmath59 presented preliminary results additional computational costs correction doppler phase shift cw signal ns orbiting binary companion given expressions compute number filters required search mismatch time integration parameter space thorough description preparation plan start investigation hierarchical algorithms speed up search balasubramanian r. sathyaprakash b. s. dhurandhar s. v. 1996 . rev . d 53 , 3033
| 0.436756
| 2,546
| 1,329
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,527
|
using stationary solutions of the linearized two - dimensional gross - pitaevskii equation , we describe the `` ship wave '' pattern occurring in the supersonic flow of a bose - einstein condensate past an obstacle .
it is shown that these `` ship waves '' are generated outside the mach cone .
the developed analytical theory is confirmed by numerical simulations of the flow past body problem in the frame of the full non - stationary gross - pitaevskii equation .
|
experimental creation of bose - einstein condensate ( bec ) has led to emergence of a new field of nonlinear wave dynamics owing to a remarkable richness of nonlinear wave patterns supported by this medium .
first , vortices and bright and dark solitons were observed and their dynamics was studied theoretically in framework of the mean - field approach ( see , e.g. @xcite and references therein ) .
then , dispersive shocks generated by a large and sharp disturbance of bec were found in experiment @xcite and explained theoretically @xcite in framework of the whitham theory of modulations of nonlinear waves ( see also numerical experiment in @xcite ) . at last ,
the stationary waves generated by supersonic flow of bec past obstacles have been recently observed @xcite .
they were studied in @xcite where the main focus was on the nonlinear component representing a train of solitons ( in the simplest case of a single soliton @xcite ) or , more precisely , having a form of a modulated nonlinear periodic wave .
the theory developed in @xcite shows that there exist stationary spatial solutions of the gross - pitaevskii ( gp ) equation which describe nonlinear waves supported by a supersonic bec flow with mach number @xmath0 where @xmath1 is velocity of the oncoming flow at @xmath2 and @xmath3 is the sound speed of the long - wavelength linear waves .
the density @xmath4 of the condensate , as well as the components of the velocity field , depend on the variable @xmath5 alone , where @xmath6 is the slope of the phase lines with respect to the @xmath7 axis and it is supposed that the velocity of the oncoming flow is directed along the @xmath8 axis . then , the mach cone for sound waves with infinitely large wavelength corresponds to the slope @xmath9 and it was shown in @xcite that the spatial ( oblique ) solitons have @xmath10 , that is they are located inside the mach cone . in particular
, it was shown that the shallow solitons are formed close to the mach cone , @xmath11 , and they are asymptotically described by the korteweg - de vries ( kdv ) equation ; and deep solitons have @xmath12 ( i.e. they are formed at small angles with respect to direction of the oncoming flow ) and are asymptotically described by the nonlinear schrdinger ( nls ) equation . on the contrary ,
the linear waves are generated outside the mach cone and they have @xmath13 .
in fact , these linear waves had been observed in numerical simulations some years ago @xcite but the theory of their generation has not been developed so far .
the aim of this paper is to develop such a theory .
our analysis is based on the use of the mean - filed description of bec dynamics in the framework of the gp equation @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the order parameter ( `` condensate wave function '' ) , @xmath16 is the potential which confines atoms of a bose gas in a trap and/or describes interaction of the bec with the obstacle , and @xmath17 is an effective coupling constant arising due to inter - atomic collisions with the @xmath18-wave scattering length @xmath19 , @xmath20 @xmath21 being the atomic mass .
here we consider the bose - einstein condensate with repulsive interaction between particles for which @xmath22 .
as suggested by the experimental set - up @xcite , we consider a two - dimensional flow of a condensate , so that the condensate wave function @xmath23 depends on only two spatial coordinates , @xmath24 .
to simplify the theory , we assume that the characteristic size of the obstacle is much less than its distance from the center of the trap , so that the oncoming flow can be considered as uniform with constant density @xmath25 of atoms and constant velocity @xmath26 directed parallel to @xmath8 axis ( see also estimates in @xcite ) .
it is convenient to transform eq .
( [ 2 - 2 ] ) to a `` hydrodynamic '' form by means of the substitution @xmath27 where @xmath28 is density of atoms in bec and @xmath29 denotes its velocity field , and to introduce dimensionless variables @xmath30 where @xmath31 is the bec healing length and numerical constants are introduced for future convenience . as a result of this transformation
we obtain the system ( we omit tildes for convenience of the notation ) @xmath32=0 , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath33 .
since we shall consider waves far enough from the obstacle , the potential is omitted in ( [ 2 - 5 ] ) .
we are interested in linear waves propagating on the background flow with @xmath34 , @xmath35 , @xmath36 .
hence , we introduce @xmath37 and linearize the system ( [ 2 - 5 ] ) with respect to small deviations @xmath38 . as a result
we obtain the system @xmath39 which describes propagation of linear waves in bec with a uniform flow .
we obtain the applicability condition of these equations , if we notice that in the linear wave @xmath40 and the nonlinear terms of the order of magnitude @xmath41 can be neglected as long as they are much less than the linear ones @xmath42 .
thus , we get the criterion @xmath43 hence , if @xmath44 is large enough , the linear theory is applicable to description of waves outside the mach cone far enough from the obstacle , where the density amplitude @xmath45 of the wave satisfies the condition ( [ 10a ] ) . for harmonic waves
@xmath46 $ ] the system ( [ 3 - 1 ] ) yields at once the dispersion relation @xmath47 where @xmath48 .
now we consider the stationary wave patterns far enough from the obstacle where the condition ( [ 10a ] ) is supposed to be fulfilled .
in fact , this problem is analogous to the kelvin theory of ship waves generated by a ship moving in a deep water , but with a different dispersion law ( [ 3 - 2 ] ) .
hence , we shall follow kelvin s method in its form presented in @xcite .
first , we notice that in a stationary wave pattern @xmath49 and , hence , the components of the wavevector @xmath50 are the functions of the space coordinates @xmath51 connected with each other by the relationship @xmath52 where we have taken into account that for chosen geometry of the bec flow the wave must propagate upwind i.e. @xmath53 .
next , the `` ship wave '' pattern corresponds to a modulated two - dimensional wave where the wavevector @xmath54 is a gradient of the phase @xcite , @xmath55 hence , the components @xmath56 satisfy the condition @xmath57 which , with an account of ( [ 3 - 3 ] ) , yields the equation for @xmath58 @xmath59 where @xmath60 is defined by the derivative of an implicit function ( [ 3 - 3 ] ) : @xmath61 it follows from eq .
( [ 3 - 6 ] ) that @xmath62 and @xmath58 are constant along the characteristics defined as solutions of the equation @xmath63 at last , since at large distances from the obstacle , the latter can be considered as a point - like source of waves , the resulting stationary wave is centered , that is the characteristics intersect at the point @xmath64 of the location of the obstacle .
hence , we obtain the solution @xmath65 where @xmath66 is the angle between the @xmath8 axis and the radius - vector @xmath67 of the point @xmath68 with wavevector @xmath56 ; see fig . 1 where other convenient parameters are also defined , namely , the angle @xmath69 between the wavevector @xmath54 and a negative direction of the @xmath8 axis , and the angle @xmath70 between vectors @xmath54 and @xmath67 .
normal to it at the point @xmath68 and coordinates @xmath66 and @xmath69 defining the parameters of the wave pattern at this point . , width=226,height=226 ]
thus , we have @xmath71 @xmath72 then elementary calculation gives for ( [ 4 - 2 ] ) the expression @xmath73 and eq .
( [ 4 - 4 ] ) yields @xmath74 thus , we have found that for a fixed value of @xmath69 the components @xmath56 are constant along the line @xmath75 with @xmath66 defined by eq .
( [ 4 - 5 ] ) and the length of the wavevector given by ( [ 4 - 6 ] ) .
therefore the phase ( [ 3 - 4 ] ) can be conveniently calculated by integration along the line @xmath75 with constant vector @xmath54 , so that @xmath76 it means that the lines of constant phase ( e.g. the wave crests ) @xmath77 are determined in parametrical form by eq .
( [ 4 - 5 ] ) and @xmath78 where @xmath79 is given by eq .
( [ 4 - 6 ] ) and @xmath80 can be calculated from @xmath81 which gives , after elementary algebra , the expression @xmath82 this expression permits one to express eq .
( [ 5 - 2 ] ) as @xmath83 and eq .
( [ 4 - 5 ] ) as @xmath84 at last , the curves with constant phase @xmath77 are given in cartesian coordinates by the formulas @xmath85 thus , we have found the expressions describing the linear wave pattern in a parametric form where the parameter @xmath69 changes in the interval @xmath86 for @xmath87 we have @xmath88 and @xmath89 , that is small values of @xmath69 correspond to the wave before the obstacle .
the boundary values @xmath90 correspond to the lines @xmath91 that is the curves of constant phase become asymptotically the straight lines parallel to the mach cone . the general pattern is shown in fig . 2
we have compared the above approximate analytical theory with the exact numerical solution of the gp equation , which in non - dimensional units ( [ 2 - 4 ] ) takes the standard form @xmath92 which corresponds for @xmath93 to the system ( [ 2 - 5 ] ) with @xmath94 in our simulations the obstacle was modeled by an impenetrable disk with radius @xmath95 .
such an obstacle introduces large enough perturbation into the flow to generate an oblique solitons pair behind it ( see @xcite ) .
we assume that at the initial moment @xmath96 there is no disturbance in the condensate , so that it is described by the plane wave function @xmath97 corresponding to a uniform condensate flow . for large enough evolution time
, the wave pattern around the obstacle tends to a stationary structure .
an example of such a structure for @xmath98 is shown in fig . 2 . and
the radius of an impenetrable obstacle to @xmath95 . dashed line corresponds to the linear analytical theory for the line of constant phase .
it corresponds to eqs .
( [ 5 - 6 ] ) but the curve is shifted to 1 unit of length to the left from the center of the obstacle for better fitting to numerics . it should be noted that this distance is negligibly small in our theory corresponding to a point - like obstacle .
a pair of oblique dark lines behind the obstacle correspond to spatial solitons studied in @xcite.,width=302,height=226 ] a dashed line corresponds to the analytic theory developed in the preceding section ; as we see it agrees very well with the numerical results for @xmath98 .
the condition ( [ 10a ] ) indicates that the nonlinear effects grow up with increase of @xmath44 . to demonstrate this explicitly ,
we have compared the wavelength @xmath99 at @xmath89 calculated using the developed linear analytic theory with the same parameter obtained from our full numerical simulations . according to linear theory ,
the wavelength at @xmath89 ( i.e. @xmath87 ) is constant and equal to @xmath100 where we have used eq .
( [ 4 - 6 ] ) . in fig . 4 we compare this dependence of the wavelength @xmath99 on the mach number @xmath44 with the results of numerical simulations at the point with @xmath101 .
as we see , eq . ( [ 6 - 3 ] ) is very accurate for values of @xmath44 satisfying the condition ( [ 10a ] ) and discrepancy between analytical and numerical results slightly increases with increase of @xmath44 . in general , this plot confirms validity of a linear theory in the region of its applicability .
we have developed here the theory of linear waves generated by the flow of bec past an obstacle .
the linear approximation is correct for small enough amplitudes of the perturbation .
this condition is satisfied in the case of small disturbance introduced by the obstacle and not too high values of the mach number .
our numerical simulations confirm the analytical theory in the region of its applicability .
|
creation of bose - einstein condensate ( ) led to new field nonlinear wave dynamics patterns vortices bright dark solitons observed dynamics studied in mean - field approach dispersive shocks by large disturbance of bec found in experiment @xcite explained whitham theory of modulations nonlinear waves stationary waves by supersonic flow of bec past obstacles observed @xcite studied focus on nonlinear component representing train of solitons modulated nonlinear periodic wave theory in @xcite shows stationary spatial solutions of gross - pitaevskii ( gp ) equation describe nonlinear waves supported by supersonic bec flow with mach number @xmath0 @xmath1 is velocity oncoming flow @xmath3 sound speed of long - wavelength linear waves density of condensate components velocity field depend on variable @xmath5 @xmath6 slope of phase lines @xmath7 axis velocity of oncoming flow directed along @xmath8 axismach cone for sound waves large wavelength corresponds to slope @xmath9 shown spatial solitons have @xmath10 inside mach cone shallow solitons formed close to mach cone @xmath11 asymptotically described by korteweg - de vries equation deep solitons have @xmath12 formed at small angles oncoming flow asymptotically described by nonlinear schrdinger equation linear waves generated outside mach cone have @xmath13 linear waves observed in numerical simulations ago theory generation not developed aim paper to develop theory analysis based on mean - filed description of bec dynamics gp equation @xmath14 @xmath15 order parameter condensate wave function @xmath16 potential atoms bose gas trap @xmath17 coupling constant inter - atomic collisions @xmath18-wave scattering length @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 atomic mass consider bose - einstein condensate with repulsive interaction between particles @xmath22 two - dimensional flow of condensate condensate wave function depends on two spatial coordinates @xmath24simplify theory assume size obstacle less than distance from center trap oncoming flow uniform constant density @xmath25 atoms velocity @xmath26 parallel to @xmath8 axis estimates transform eq . [ 2 - 2 ] ) to hydrodynamic form substitution @xmath27 density atoms @xmath29 velocity field introduce dimensionless variables @xmath30 bec healing length numerical constants introduced convenience obtain system omit tildes @xmath32=0 @xmath33 consider waves far from obstacle potential omitted 2 - 5 interested in linear waves propagating background flow with @xmath34 @xmath36 introduce @xmath37 linearize system 2 - 5 ] ) small deviations @xmath38 obtain system @xmath39 describes propagation linear waves bec uniform flow obtain applicability condition equations linear wave @xmath40 nonlinear terms order magnitude @xmath41 neglected less than linear ones @xmath42 get criterion @xmath43 if @xmath44 large enough linear theory applicable description waves outside mach cone far from obstacle density amplitude @xmath45 wave satisfies condition ( [ 10a ] )harmonic waves @xmath46 system ( [ 3 - 1 ] yields dispersion relation @xmath47 @xmath48 consider stationary wave patterns far from obstacle condition ( [ 10a ] ) fulfilled problem analogous kelvin theory ship waves deep water different dispersion law ( [ 3 - 2 ] ) follow kelvin s method @xcite stationary wave pattern @xmath49 components wavevector @xmath50 functions space coordinates @xmath51 connected relationship @xmath52 wave propagate upwind @xmath53 ship wave pattern modulated two - dimensional wave wavevector @xmath54 gradient phase @xcite @xmath55 components @xmath56 satisfy condition @xmath57 [ 3 - 3 ] ) yields equation @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 defined derivative implicit function [ 3 - 3 ] ) @xmath61 eq 3 - 6 ] @xmath62 @xmath58 constant characteristics solutions equation @xmath63 large distances from obstacle - source waves resulting stationary wave centered characteristics intersect point @xmath64 location obstacleobtain solution @xmath65 @xmath66 angle @xmath8 axis radius - vector @xmath67 point @xmath68 wavevector @xmath56 fig . 1 parameters angle @xmath69 wavevector @xmath54 negative direction axis angle @xmath70 vectors @xmath54 normal point @xmath68 coordinates @xmath66 @xmath69 parameters wave pattern,height=226 @xmath71 @xmath72 calculation 4 - 2 expression @xmath73 eq 4 - 4 yields @xmath74 fixed value @xmath69 components @xmath56 constant line @xmath75 @xmath66 defined eq . 4 - 5 length wavevector 4 - 6 ] ) phase ( [ 3 - 4 ] ) calculated integration line @xmath75 constant vector @xmath54 @xmath76 lines constant phase wave crests @xmath77 determined by eq . 4 - 5 ] ) @xmath78 @xmath79 eq . 4 - 6 @xmath80 calculated from @xmath81 expression @xmath82 express eq . 5 - 2 @xmath83 eq .4 - 5 ] @xmath84 curves constant phase @xmath77 given cartesian coordinates by formulas @xmath85 found expressions linear wave pattern parametric form parameter @xmath69 changes interval @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 small values @xmath69 correspond wave before obstacle boundary values @xmath90 correspond lines @xmath91 curves constant phase straight lines parallel to mach cone pattern fig . 2 compared analytical theory with numerical solution gp equation non - dimensional units standard form @xmath92 corresponds @xmath93 system 2 - 5 @xmath94 obstacle modeled by impenetrable disk radius @xmath95 obstacle introduces perturbation oblique solitons pair initial moment @xmath96 no disturbance in condensate described plane wave function @xmath97 uniform condensate flow large evolution time wave pattern around obstacle stationary structure example structure @xmath98 in fig . 2 radius impenetrable obstacle to @xmath95 dashed line corresponds linear analytical theory line constant phase curve shifted 1 unit left from center obstacle fitting numerics distance negligibly small in theory point - like obstacleoblique dark lines behind obstacle spatial solitons in @xcite,width=302,height=226 dashed line analytic theory agrees with numerical results @xmath98 condition ( [ 10a ] ) indicates nonlinear effects grow with increase @xmath44 compared wavelength @xmath99 at @xmath89 analytic theory with numerical simulations wavelength at @xmath89 constant equal to @xmath100 eq . ( [ 4 - 6 ] ) fig . 4 dependence wavelength @xmath99 on mach number @xmath44 with numerical simulations @xmath101 eq . ( [ 6 - 3 ] ) accurate for values @xmath44 condition 10a ] discrepancy between analytical numerical results increases with @xmath44 plot confirms linear theory developed theory of linear waves flow bec past obstacle linear approximation correct for small amplitudes perturbation condition satisfied small disturbance obstacle not high values mach number numerical simulations confirm analytical theory
| 0.438072
| 2,882
| 1,531
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,528
|
recently , controversy has erupted over whether gas - rich spiral - spiral mergers are capable of forming _
m@xmath0 _ ellipticals .
measurements of @xmath1@xmath2 from the 2.29@xmath3 co band - head for local lirg / ulirgs , suggest they are not .
ir - bright mergers are often cited as the best candidates for forming massive ellipticals , so the recent observations have raised doubts about both the toomre merger hypothesis and the fundamental assumptions of @xmath4-cdm galaxy formation models .
however , kinematics obtained with the calcium ii triplet at 8500 suggest mergers are forming _ m _ @xmath5 _ m@xmath0 _ ellipticals . in this work , we show that kinematics derived from the co stellar absorption band - head leads to a significant underestimation of the masses of lirgs / ulirgs .
this is primarily due to the presence of a young population affecting co band - head measurements .
|
in the local universe , luminous and ultra - luminous infrared galaxies ( lirgs & ulirgs ) have long been proposed as ideal candidates for forming massive elliptical galaxies @xcite .
they contain vast quantities of molecular gas and most show evidence of recent or ongoing merging activity , along with relatively high star - formation rates .
observations of these and other advanced mergers have long suggested that their luminosities are equivalent to or greater than massive elliptical galaxies @xcite , and @xcite , hereafter paper i. + the arguments _ against _ lirgs / ulirgs , and mergers in general forming _
l@xmath0 _ or _
m@xmath0 _ elliptical galaxies are based on kinematic arguements . until recently
, kinematic studies of lirgs / ulirgs have used the the infrared co stellar absorption lines at 1.6@xmath3 and 2.29@xmath3 to measure central velocity dispersions ( @xmath1@xmath2 ) .
these stellar band - heads are prominent in late - type stars and lie within observable infrared atmospheric windows .
+ @xmath1@xmath6 s have been previously measured for @xmath7 60 lirgs / ulirgs and two non - lirg / ulirg merger remnants @xcite , yielding a median @xmath1@xmath2 @xmath7 150 km s@xmath8 , far less than an _ m@xmath0 _ elliptical galaxy .
+ @xcite used the mg_ib _
( @xmath9 @xmath7 5200 ) and triplet ( @xmath9 @xmath7 8500 , hereafter cat ) to measure @xmath1@xmath2 in a sample of 13 visually selected mergers , producing a median of @xmath1@xmath2 @xmath10 200 km s@xmath8 .
@xcite , hereafter paper ii , measured @xmath1@xmath2 for 38 optically selected single - nuclei merger remnants , including 10 lirgs and 2 ulirgs , using the cat absorption lines and found a median @xmath1@xmath2 @xmath10 211 km s@xmath8 for the entire sample and a median of 196 km s@xmath8 for the lirgs / ulirgs .
+ in paper ii , _
k_-band photometry from paper i was combined with @xmath1@xmath11 to test whether and where merger remnants lie on the _ k_-band fundamental plane @xcite .
most of the merger remnants did lie on or within the scatter of the fundamental plane .
a small number of predominantly lirg / ulirg remnants sat offset from the fundamental plane in a tail - like feature , ( see figure 1 in paper ii ) .
the offset was due to high surface brightness ( @xmath12@xmath13@xmath14@xmath15@xmath16 ) , not small @xmath1@xmath2 , suggesting the presence of a younger ir - bright population .
+ paper ii also demonstrated that the co band - head produced consistently _ smaller _
@xmath1@xmath2 for lirgs / ulirgs than cat .
this suggested previous infrared studies may have _ underestimated _ their masses .
unfortunately , to date , _ all _ published @xmath1@xmath11 and @xmath1@xmath6 of remnants lie within the above - mentioned tail - like offset from the _ k_-band fundamental plane , making it difficult to separate whether the discrepancy is related to galaxy properties or problems with one of the stellar lines .
@xcite ( hereafter sg03 ) first noted that in their sample of 25 ( mostly s0 ) early - type galaxies , a signficant fraction also showed @xmath1@xmath6 @xmath12 @xmath1@xmath17 .
the largest discrepancies were found in s0s .
they proposed that dust enshrouded stellar disks , visible only in the ir produced smaller @xmath1@xmath18 .
an e0 and 6 non - lirg / ulirg merger remnants found to lie on the fundamental plane were observed in queue mode with the gemini near - infrared spectrograph ( gnirs ) on gemini - south ( program gs-2007a - q-17 , p.i .
rothberg ) using the short camera with the 111 l / mm grating and 0@xmath19.3 @xmath20 99@xmath19 slit ( r @xmath7 6200 ) .
observations were centered on the @xmath21co(2,0 ) 2.29@xmath3 band - head .
previously published optical and infrared spectroscopic data were also used ( see papers i and ii for details ) , bringing the total to 8 non - lirg and 6 lirg merger remnants .
all @xmath1@xmath2 were either extracted or corrected ( for data from the literature ) to a 1.53 _ h_@xmath8 kpc central aperture . + low - resolution ( r @xmath7 1200 ) spectra were obtained with spex on the nasa infrared telescope facility for 11 merger remnants .
observations were made using the short cross - dispersed mode ( 0.8@xmath3 @xmath12 @xmath9 @xmath12 2.4@xmath3 , _ r _ @xmath7 1200 ) with the 0@xmath19.5 @xmath20 15@xmath19 slit .
these observations were used to measure brackett @xmath22 ( br@xmath22 ) equivalent widths ( ew ) and supplement measurement of co indices for published @xmath1@xmath6 . + a comparison sample of 23 pure elliptical galaxies was assembled from the literature to look for the same discrepancy between @xmath1@xmath23 and @xmath1@xmath6 observed in merger remnants and sg03 .
all @xmath1@xmath2 obtained from the literature were corrected to a 1.53 _ h_@xmath8 kpc aperture .
figure 1 shows a three - panel comparison among the lirg merger remnants ( _ left _ ) , non - lirg merger remnants ( _ center _ ) and elliptical galaxies ( _ right _ ) .
the data were fit with a double weighted least - squares fit to compare with a slope of unity to search for discrepancies in @xmath1@xmath2 .
both the non - lirg merger remnants and the elliptical galaxies have a slope within 1@xmath1 of unity , while the the lirg merger remnants yield a slope of 0.24@xmath240.1 .
in paper ii it was postulated that the cat and co stellar features were probing two different stellar populations ; the former probing older , late - type giants contributed from the progenitor spirals , and the latter sensitive to young red supergiants ( rsgs ) or asymptotic giant branch ( agb ) stars formed during the merger . a direct way to test this is to measure ews of the cat and co features and compare those with stellar populations models in order to age - date each population .
the premise is that the younger stellar populations are created within a disk formed when gas from the progenitor spirals dissipates towards the barycenter of the merger ( see @xcite ) . at _
k_-band , the light from this population dominates during certain epochs @xcite ( hereafter m05 ) .
+ figure 2 shows stellar population models from m05 ( _ solid lines _ ) for a simple burst population with a salpeter imf and solar metallicity for the cat@xmath0 and co indices .
cat@xmath0 ews and co@xmath25 indices were measured for each merger remnant and used in conjunction with the models to age - date each remnant as plotted . in some cases , the measured indices intersected multiple points in the models .
the degeneracy was broken by measuring the ew of the paschen triplet ( pat ) absorption lines ( near 8500 ) and comparing with predicted values from m05 , or measuring the ews of br@xmath22 emission ( 2.165@xmath3 ) and comparing with predicted values from starburst99 @xcite . in some cases
the degeneracy for co ages could not be broken due to the absence of br@xmath22 .
double values are plotted in figure 2 with a dotted line connecting them . + overplotted in figure 2 ( _ right _ ) next to each merger remnant are the fractional @xmath1@xmath2 differences ( @xmath1@xmath26 - @xmath1@xmath27)/@xmath1@xmath26 .
the lirg merger remnants show larger fractional differences than the non - lirg remnants ( except ngc 7252 ) .
the results in figure 2 appear to support the premise that the presence of young populations are responsible for the smaller @xmath1@xmath2 observed in lirgs
. the final test will be to confirm whether these young populations reside in rotating disks located within the central few kpc of the lirg / ulirg merger remnant using spatially resolved spectroscopic observations of the co band - head .
|
local universe luminous ultra - luminous infrared galaxies ( lirgs ulirgs ) proposed ideal candidates massive elliptical galaxies @xcite contain molecular gas show merging activity high star - formation rates observations mergers suggested luminosities equivalent massive elliptical galaxies @xcite arguments against lirgs / ulirgs mergers forming elliptical galaxies based kinematic arguements studies used infrared co stellar absorption lines 1.6 2.29@xmath3 measure central velocity dispersions stellar band - heads prominent late - type stars infrared atmospheric windows measured for @xmath7 60 lirgs / ulirgs two non - lirg / ulirg merger remnants median @xmath1@xmath2 150 km s@xmath8 less than m@xmath0 elliptical galaxy @xcite used mg_ib 5200 triplet 8500 measure @xmath1@xmath2 13 mergers median @xmath1 200 km s@xmath8 @xcite measured @xmath1@xmath2 38 single - nuclei merger remnants 10 lirgs 2 ulirgs absorption lines found median 211 km s@xmath8 for sample 196 km s for lirgs / ulirgs paper ii k_-band photometry combined with @xmath1@xmath11 test merger remnants on k_-band fundamental plane most remnants on within scatter fundamental plane small number lirg / ulirg remnants offset from plane tail - like feature figure 1 offset due to high surface brightness younger ir - bright population paper ii co band - head produced smaller @xmath1@xmath2 for lirgs / ulirgs than cat previous infrared studies underestimated masses all published @xmath1@xmath11@xmath6 remnants within tail - like offset from k_-band fundamental plane difficult to separate discrepancy to galaxy properties or problems stellar lines @xcite sg03 noted sample 25 early - type galaxies fraction showed @xmath1@xmath6 largest discrepancies in s0sproposed dust stellar disks produced smaller @xmath1@xmath18 6 non - lirg ulirg merger remnants fundamental plane observed gemini near - infrared spectrograph gemini - south short camera 111 l / mm grating 0@xmath19.3 @xmath20 99@xmath19 slit observations @xmath21co(2,0 ) 2.29@xmath3 band - head optical infrared spectroscopic data used total 8 non - lirg 6 lirg merger remnants @xmath1@xmath2 extracted corrected 1.53 _ h_@xmath8 kpc central aperture low - resolution 1200 spectra obtained spex nasa infrared telescope 11 merger remnants observations short cross - dispersed mode 0.8@xmath3 2.4@xmath3 1200 0@xmath19.5 @xmath20 15@xmath19 slit observations brackett @xmath22 equivalent widths co indices @xmath1@xmath6 comparison sample 23 elliptical galaxies discrepancy @xmath1@xmath23 @xmath1@xmath6 merger remnants @xmath1@xmath2 corrected 1.53 _ h_@xmath8 kpc aperturefigure 1 shows three - panel comparison lirg merger non - lirg merger elliptical galaxies data fit with double weighted least - squares slope of unity discrepancies @xmath1@xmath2 non - lirg merger remnants elliptical galaxies have slope within 1@xmath1 unity lirg merger remnants slope 0.24@xmath240.1 paper ii postulated cat and co stellar features two stellar populations former older late - type giants progenitor spirals latter young red supergiants during merger test measure ews cat and co features compare with stellar populations models age - date each population younger stellar populations created disk when gas from progenitor spirals dissipates towards barycenter merger light population dominates during certain epochs figure 2 shows stellar population models from m05 simple burst population salpeter imf solar metallicity for cat@xmath0 co indices co@xmath25 indices measured for each merger remnant age - date each remnant measured indices intersected modelsdegeneracy broken measuring paschen triplet absorption lines near 8500 comparing values m05 ews br@xmath22 emission 2.165@xmath3 values starburst99 @xcite degeneracy co ages broken absence br@xmath22 double values plotted figure 2 dotted line connecting overplotted merger remnant fractional @xmath1@xmath2 differences - lirg merger remnants show larger fractional differences non - lirg remnants except ngc 7252 ) results support young populations smaller @xmath1@xmath2 lirgs final test confirm young populations rotating disks central kpc lirg / ulirg merger remnant using spatially resolved spectroscopic observations co band - head
| 0.324241
| 2,022
| 1,038
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,534
|
we present measurements of the spatial clustering of ultraluminous infrared galaxies in two redshift intervals , @xmath0 and @xmath1 .
both samples cluster strongly , with @xmath2mpc for the @xmath1 sample , and @xmath3mpc for the @xmath0 sample , making them among the most biased galaxies at these epochs .
these clustering amplitudes are consistent with both populations residing in dark matter haloes with masses of @xmath4 .
we infer that a minimum dark matter halo mass is an important factor for all forms of luminous , obscured activity in galaxies at @xmath5 . adopting plausible models for
the growth of dm haloes with redshift , then the haloes hosting the @xmath1 sample will likely host the richest clusters of galaxies at z=0 , whereas the haloes hosting the @xmath0 sample will likely host poor to rich clusters at z=0 .
|
when we look at the night sky , we see that galaxies seem to be arranged in a particular way .
one might expect that galaxies would be distributed randomly , much as grains of sand would if you threw a handful across the floor , but instead , they seem to trace elegant structures ; galaxy clusters are connected to each other by long filaments , interspersed with large voids , where few or no galaxies are seen .
the drivers behind the formation of these large - scale structures have been the subject of intense study and debate for over thirty years ; how did the universe go from being smooth and homogeneous just after the big bang to the clumpy , clustered universe we see today ? at the core of current theories for the formation of these structures is the premise that the evolution of the total mass distribution is described by the gravitational collapse of primordial density fluctuations , and that this evolution is traced by the evolution of galaxies .
overdense regions , or ` haloes ' , are predicted to undergo mergers to build haloes of increasing mass , with galaxies forming from the baryonic matter in these haloes .
this framework of ` biased ' hierarchical buildup @xcite has proven to be remarkably successful in explaining several important aspects of galaxy and large - scale structure formation .
this paradigm is however not without its problems .
a good example of these problems concerns the evolution of massive ( @xmath6 ) galaxies .
we might expect that massive galaxies form slowly , with many halo mergers needed to build up the required large baryon reservoirs , and indeed some galaxies do appear to form in this way @xcite .
there is however evidence that many massive galaxies may form at high redshift @xcite and on short timescales @xcite , directly counter to early , ` naive ' model predictions .
intriguingly , recent surveys ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) have uncovered a huge population of distant , ir bright sources that are plausible candidates for being rapidly forming , massive galaxies , however they are so numerous that even recent models have difficulty in explaining their counts , and invoke a wide variety of solutions ( e.g. @xcite ) .
it seems likely therefore that there are strong , but subtle links between distant , ir / sub - mm bright galaxies , and the formation of large - scale structures .
therefore , we need observations that relate the properties of these galaxies with the underlying dark matter distribution . motivated by this
, we have used data from the spitzer wide area infrared extragalactic survey ( swire , @xcite ) to select large samples of distant ultraluminous infrared galaxies ( ulirgs , l@xmath7l@xmath8 ) and study their clustering evolution with redshift .
we assume @xmath9 km s@xmath10 mpc@xmath10 , @xmath11 , and @xmath12 .
the results presented here were originally published in @xcite .
to select high redshift ulirgs , we use the 1.6@xmath13 m emission feature , which arises due to photospheric emission from evolved stars .
when this feature is redshifted into one of the irac channels then that channel exhibits a ` bump ' @xcite . a complete discussion of the source selection and characterization methods is given in lonsdale et al 2006 ( in preparation ) , which we summarize here .
our sources are taken from the elais n1 and elais n2 fields , and the lockman hole , covering 20.9 square degrees in total .
we first selected those sources fainter than r=22 ( vega ) , and brighter than 400@xmath13jy at 24@xmath13 m . within this set , we selected two samples that displayed a ` bump ' in the 4.5@xmath13 m and 5.8@xmath13 m channels , i.e. where @xmath14 for one sample ( the ` b2 ' sample ) and where @xmath15 for the other sample ( the ` b3 ' sample ) .
this resulted in a total of 1689 b2 sources and 1223 b3 sources .
for both samples we used hyper - z @xcite to estimate redshifts , the results from which place most of the b2 sources within @xmath0 , and most of the b3 sources within @xmath16 . from the best fits we also derived ir luminosities and power sources ; the requirement that the sources have @xmath17jy demands an ir luminosity of @xmath18l@xmath19 for all the sources , with ( most objects having ) a starburst as the dominant power source , with star formation rates of @xmath20m@xmath19yr@xmath10 .
similarly , the presence of the 1.6@xmath13 m feature demands a minimum mass of evolved stars of @xmath21m@xmath19 .
both the b2 and b3 sources are thus good candidates for being moderately massive galaxies harboring an intense , obscured starburst , making them similar in nature to both local ulirgs , and high - redshift smgs .
we measured the angular clustering of both samples using the methods described in @xcite , which we summarize here .
we found that the levels of angular clustering seen in the three fields were consistent with each other to within 0.5@xmath22 , and so combined the angular clustering measures for each sample over the three fields . to quantify the strength of clustering
, we fit both datasets with a power law , @xmath23 , where @xmath24 and @xmath25 is the clustering amplitude ; @xmath26 for the b3s and @xmath27 for the b2s . to convert these angular clustering amplitudes to spatial clustering amplitudes
, we invert limbers equation : @xmath28^{2}}{\int_{a}^{b}\left(\frac{dn}{dz}\right)^{2}e(z ) d_{\theta}^{1-\gamma}(z)f(z)(1+z)dz}\right]^{\frac{1}{\gamma}}\ ] ] where @xmath29 parametrizes the redshift evolution of @xmath30 , and : @xmath31/2 ) } , e(z ) = [ \omega_{m}(1+z)^{3 } + \omega_{\lambda}]^{\frac{1}{2}}\ ] ] we derived @xmath32 from the photometric redshift distributions @xcite . for the b2 sources
this is a gaussian centered at @xmath33 with a fwhm of @xmath34 , and for the b3 sources this is a gaussian centered at @xmath35 with a fwhm of @xmath36 .
the resulting correlation lengths are @xmath37mpc for the b2 sources , and @xmath38mpc for the b3 sources .
to place these clustering results in context , we consider two models .
the first parametrizes the spatial correlation function , @xmath39 , as a single power law in comoving coordinates , where the comoving correlation length , @xmath40 , is : here the choice of @xmath42 determines the redshift evolution @xcite .
several cases are usually quoted .
first is ` comoving clustering ' , where haloes expand with the universe , and @xmath43 ; in this case clustering remains constant .
second is the family of models for which @xmath44 , for which clustering increases with time .
examples of this family include ( a ) ` stable ' clustering , for which @xmath45 ( in this case the haloes are frozen in _ proper _ coordinates , ( b ) the predicted evolution of clustering of the overall dark matter distribution , where @xmath46 @xcite , and @xmath47 at z=0 @xcite , ( c ) ` linear ' clustering , where @xmath48 . a cautionary note to this
is that detailed interpretations of clustering evolution from these models suffer from several theoretical flaws @xcite , and so should be thought of as qualitative indicators rather than quantitative predictions .
we therefore simply use the ` stable ' and ` linear ' models as indicators of the possible range of halo clustering amplitude with redshift .
the second class of model comprises those in which comoving correlation lengths increase with _ increasing _ redshift .
these models introduce ` bias ' , @xmath49 , between the galaxies and the underlying dark matter .
an example of such models are the ` fixed mass ' models @xcite , which predict the clustering strength of haloes of a specified mass at any given redshift . in figure [ r0plot ]
we plot the @xmath42 model for dark matter , stableand ` linear ' epsilon models normalized to the b2 and b3 clustering strengths , the fixed halo mass models for halo masses of @xmath50m@xmath19 , @xmath51m@xmath19 , and @xmath52m@xmath19 , the @xmath30 values for the b2 and b3 galaxies , and the spatial correlation lengths of other galaxy populations taken from the literature . with the the uncertainties described earlier
firmly in mind , we use figure [ r0plot ] to explore the relationships between our samples , the underlying dark matter , and other galaxies . both the b2s and the b3s
are strongly clustered , with correlation lengths much higher than that predicted for the overall dm distribution .
both b2s and b3s cluster significantly more strongly than optical qsos at their respective epochs , and b3s cluster more strongly than smgs . based on the @xcite models
, then we derive _ approximate _ 1@xmath22 halo mass ranges of @xmath53m@xmath54 for the b3s , and @xmath55m@xmath56 for the b2s .
interestingly , halo masses comparable to these were recently derived for an independent sample of high - redshift ulirgs by @xcite .
the most interesting comparison is however between the two samples themselves .
the clustering evolution of qsos with redshift @xcite may mean that there is a ` minimum ' host halo mass for qso activity , below which no qso is seen , of @xmath57m@xmath19 .
the correlation lengths for the b2 and b3 samples are consistent with the same conclusion but for a @xmath58 ` minimum ' dm halo mass . taken together ,
these results imply that a minimum halo mass is a ` threshold ' factor for _ all _ forms of luminous activity in galaxies , both starbursts and agn .
it is also interesting to speculate on what the host haloes of b2 and b3 sources contain at lower and higher redshifts .
we might expect that a halo hosting a b3 source could contain an optically bright lbg at @xmath59 , followed by a b3 at @xmath60 , possibly accompanied by other ( near - ir selected ) star forming systems @xcite , before evolving to host a rich galaxy cluster at low redshifts .
the occupants of a halo hosting a b2 galaxy would however probably be different .
we would expect that such a halo could contain an smg at @xmath60 , and optically fainter lbgs at @xmath61 ( though probably not lbgs at @xmath62 ) . at lower redshifts such
a halo might host a radio - bright agn and or ero at @xmath63 , and a ( poor to rich ) cluster at @xmath64 .
we conclude that ulirgs at @xmath65 as a class likely signpost stellar buildup in galaxies in clusters at @xmath64 , with higher redshift ulirgs signposting stellar buildup in galaxies that will reside in more massive clusters at lower redshifts .
|
at night sky galaxies arranged particular expect distributed randomly sand trace elegant structures galaxy clusters connected by long filaments interspersed with large voids where few or no galaxies seen drivers behind formation large - scale structures subject of intense study debate for over thirty years ; how universe from smooth homogeneous after big bang to clumpy clustered universe today ? core current theories for premise evolution of total mass distribution by gravitational collapse of primordial density fluctuations evolution traced by evolution galaxies overdense regions haloes predicted to undergo mergers build haloes increasing mass galaxies forming from baryonic matter in haloes framework of biased ' hierarchical buildup successful in explaining aspects galaxy large - scale structure formation paradigm not without problems example evolution of massive galaxies expect massive galaxies form slowly many halo mergers build large baryon reservoirs some form evidence many massive galaxies may form at high redshift short timescales counter to early model predictions recent surveysuncovered population distant ir bright sources plausible for rapidly forming massive galaxies numerous recent models explaining counts invoke variety solutions @xcite likely strong subtle links between distant sub - mm bright galaxies formation large - scale structures need observations properties with dark matter distribution used data from spitzer wide area infrared extragalactic survey select large samples distant ultraluminous infrared galaxies study clustering evolution with redshift assume @xmath9 @xmath12 results published in @xcite select high redshift ulirgs use 1.6@xmath13 m emission feature due photospheric emission evolved stars redshifted into channel exhibits ` bump ' @xcite discussion source selection characterization in lonsdale et al 2006 sources from elais n1 elais n2 fields lockman hole covering 20.9 square degrees selected sources fainter than r=22 ( vega ) brighter than 400@xmath13jy at 24@xmath13 m selected two samples displayed ` bump ' in 4.5@xmath13 m and 5.8@xmath13 m channels@xmath14 one sample b2 @xmath15 b3 resulted 1689 b2 1223 b3 sources used hyper - z @xcite estimate redshifts results place b2 sources @xmath0 b3 sources @xmath16 best fits derived ir luminosities power sources requirement sources @xmath17jy demands ir luminosity @xmath18l@xmath19 starburst dominant power source star formation rates @xmath20m@xmath19yr@xmath10 1.6@xmath13 m feature demands minimum mass evolved stars @xmath21m@xmath19 b2 b3 sources good candidates moderately massive galaxies intense obscured starburst similar to local ulirgs high - redshift smgs measured angular clustering samples methods @xcite levels three fields consistent to within 0.5@xmath22 combined angular clustering measures three fields quantify strength clustering fit datasets with power law @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 clustering amplitude @xmath26 b3s @xmath27 b2sconvert angular to spatial invert limbers equation @xmath28{b}\left{dn{2}e(z\theta}{1-\gamma}+z{1 @xmath29 parametrizes redshift evolution @xmath30 @xmath31/2(z =\omega_{m}(1+z)^{3 +\omega\lambda}{1}{2}} derived @xmath32 from photometric redshift distributions @xcite b2 sources gaussian centered at @xmath33 fwhm @xmath34 b3 sources gaussian @xmath35 fwhm @xmath36 resulting correlation lengths @xmath37mpc b2 @xmath38mpc b3 sources clustering results context consider two models first parametrizes spatial correlation function @xmath39 single power law in comoving coordinates comoving correlation length @xmath40 choice @xmath42 determines redshift evolution @xcite comoving clustering haloes expand universe @xmath43 clustering remains constant @xmath44 clustering increases with timeexamples family include stable clustering @xmath45 haloes frozen in coordinates predicted evolution clustering dark matter distribution @xmath46 @xmath47 at z=0 linear ' clustering @xmath48 detailed interpretations clustering evolution suffer theoretical flaws qualitative indicators quantitative predictions use stable linear ' models as indicators halo clustering amplitude with redshift second class model comoving correlation lengths increase with redshift models introduce bias ' @xmath49 between galaxies underlying dark matter models fixed mass ' models @xcite predict clustering strength of haloes specified mass at redshift figure [ r0plot ] @xmath42 model for dark matter stableand linear epsilon models b2 b3 clustering strengths fixed halo mass models for @xmath50m @xmath51m @xmath52m @xmath30 values for b2 b3 galaxies spatial correlation lengths of other galaxy populations uncertainties figure [ r0plot ] explore relationships between samples underlying dark matter other galaxies b2s b3s strongly clustered correlation lengths higher than predicted overall dm distributionb2s b3s cluster strongly than optical qsos at epochs smgs @xcite models derive 1@xmath22 halo mass ranges of @xmath53m@xmath54 b3s b2s halo masses comparable derived for independent high - redshift ulirgs by @xcite comparison between two samples clustering evolution of qsos with redshift @xcite minimum host halo mass for qso activity no @xmath57m@xmath19 correlation lengths for b2 b3 samples consistent with conclusion @xmath58 minimum dm halo mass results imply minimum halo mass threshold factor for luminous activity in galaxies starbursts speculate host haloes of b2 b3 sources at lower higher redshifts halo hosting b3 source could contain bright lbg at @xmath59 b3 at @xmath60 star forming systems rich galaxy cluster at low redshifts halo hosting b2 galaxy contain smg at @xmath60 fainter lbgs at @xmath61 not lbgs @xmath62 lower redshifts halo might host radio - bright agn ero at @xmath63 poor rich cluster at @xmath64conclude ulirgs @xmath65 signpost stellar buildup clusters @xmath64 higher redshift ulirgs stellar buildup massive clusters lower redshifts
| 0.43619
| 2,501
| 1,300
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,537
|
with the experimental data from star on the centrality dependence of transverse momentum @xmath0 spectra of pions and protons in au+au collisions at @xmath1 , we investigate the scaling properties of transverse energy @xmath2 distributions at different centralities . in the framework of cluster formation and decay mechanism for particle production ,
the universal transverse energy distributions for pion and proton can be described separately but not simultaneously .
|
recently , the scaling behaviors of the transverse momentum distributions for particles produced in high energy collisions attract more and more attentions .
the search on the scaling behaviors of particle spectrum is significantly important for understanding the evolution of high energy heavy ion collisions and particle production mechanisms , because the produced particle distribution carries information about the dynamics of the system and is one of the most important observables in high energy collisions . in @xcite , with the experimental data from star , phenix and brahms , we found there is a scaling behavior of transverse momentum @xmath0 spectrum for pions .
the scaling function is independent of the colliding system , the colliding energy , the centrality and ( pseudo)rapidity . for protons and anti - protons , there also exists a similar scaling behavior which is independent of the centrality and rapidity in au+au collisions at @xmath1 @xcite . for strange particles , such as @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 ,
the scaling behaviors for their distributions are under consideration . in high energy heavy ion collisions , a lot of the initial kinetic energy of the bombarding nuclei is converted into those of the produced particles , including longitudinal and transverse ones .
different from momentum , kinetic energy is a scalar and is directly associated with the temperature of the hot medium created in the collisions . for different species of particles , the same momentum corresponds to different kinetic energy because of mass effect . as well - known , the kinetic energy , rather than momentum , of particles in a thermalized system satisfies the boltzmann distribution .
thus the distribution of kinetic energy of particles produced in ultra - relativistic heavy ion collisions is more effective in revealing the thermal properties of the system . with above consideration in mind
, one can ask whether the transverse kinetic energy @xmath2 distribution has similar scaling behavior .
this is our motivation of investigating the scaling properties of distributions of transverse kinetic energy @xmath2 of particles .
we hope the mass effect can be suppressed in the new scaling function . in this paper the scaling @xmath2 distribution of protons in the mid - rapidity region
is studied and compared with the scaling @xmath0 distribution .
it is very essential to ask why the scaling behaviors exist for different particles and what is the potential universal dynamics . in @xcite
we found that the string overlap mechanism can not explain data for pion and proton simultaneously . in this paper
we will consider another mechanism based on the parton percolation theory @xcite , and hope to get more information about particle production mechanism in nuclear collisions .
this paper is organized as follows : in sec .
ii , we discuss relation between distributions for @xmath2 and @xmath0 , and the scaling property of @xmath2 distribution of protons produced in au+au collisions at @xmath1 .
universal scaling functions for pion and proton are given . in sec .
iii we discuss the universal scaling functions in the framework of cluster decay .
the conclusion is drawn in sec .
from the definition of transverse kinetic energy @xmath6 , with @xmath7 mass of the particle , the invariant @xmath2 distribution is @xmath8 from the definition of @xmath2 , one can see that when @xmath9 or @xmath10 , @xmath2 is approximately equal to @xmath0 , and @xmath11 so it is feasible to only consider the scaling behavior of @xmath0 distribution in the range @xmath12 gev/@xmath13 for pions , whose mass is only @xmath14 . actually , the results obtained in @xcite are excellent .
but if @xmath7 is large , as for kaons , protons and anti - protons , etc , we must consider the mass effect and investigate the scaling behaviors of @xmath2 distributions in the same range of @xmath0 . in @xcite
we have summarized the method for searching the scaling behavior of the particle s @xmath0 spectrum .
now we can use the similar method to investigate the scaling behavior of the transverse energy distribution of final state particles , with transverse kinetic energy @xmath2 instead of transverse momentum @xmath0 .
first , define a scaled variable @xmath15 and the scaled spectrum @xmath16 with @xmath17 and @xmath3 free parameters chosen to fit the scaled distributions to the same curve .
of course values of @xmath17 and @xmath3 are different for distributions at different centralities , given that for most central collisions they are set to be 1 . then @xmath18 can be regarded as a parameterization of the @xmath2 distribution in most central au+au collisions . to obtain a universal scaling function for all centralities , independent of the arbitrary in choosing values of @xmath17 and @xmath3 for the most central collisions , we introduce
another scaled variable @xmath19 and the normalized scaling function @xmath20 here @xmath21 is defined as @xmath22 and one can easily check that @xmath23 and @xmath24 . with above steps , one can investigate whether there exists a scaling behavior of transverse energy distribution for protons produced at mid - rapidity in au+au collisions at @xmath1 , which has a wide rang @xmath0 coverage @xcite . as shown in fig .
[ protonfd ] , all data points for different centralities can be shifted to the same curve within errorbar , and the corresponding values of parameters @xmath17 and @xmath3 shown in table i. to parameterize the curve , we define @xmath25 , and the scaling function is @xmath26 after normalization , @xmath27 with redefined @xmath28 .
spectra for protons produced at mid - rapidity in au+au collisions at rhic .
feed - down corrections are considered in the data .
the solid curve is from eq .
( [ protondis ] ) .
the data are taken from @xcite after calculation with eq .
( [ ekpt]).,scaledwidth=45.0% ] .parameters for coalescing all data points to the same curves in figs .
[ protonfd ] for @xmath29 and [ pion ] for @xmath30 . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
in this paper we discussed the scaling properties of the transverse kinetic energy distributions for pions and protons in au+au collisions at 200 gev .
we showed that the @xmath2 scaling behavior can describe experimental data better than that for the @xmath0 case .
although the cluster formation and decay mechanism can describe spectra of either pion or proton at different centralities , it can not give consistent description , with the same parameters in the cluster distribution , for both species of particles at the same time .
thus it can be excluded as a consistent particle production mechanism .
other particle production mechanism must be in effect for the scaling behavior .
this work was supported in part by the national natural science foundation of china under grant nos .
10635020 and 10775057 , by the ministry of education of china under grant no .
306022 and project irt0624 .
|
scaling behaviors transverse momentum distributions for particles in high energy collisions attract attentions search on scaling particle spectrum important for understanding evolution high energy heavy ion collisions particle production mechanisms particle distribution information dynamics system important in @xcite scaling behavior of transverse momentum @xmath0 spectrum for pions independent of colliding system energy centrality)rapidity for protons anti - protons similar scaling behavior independent of centrality rapidity in au+au collisions at @xmath1 @xcite for strange particles @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 scaling behaviors under consideration in high energy ion collisions initial kinetic energy bombarding nuclei converted into produced particles kinetic energy scalar associated with temperature hot medium different species particles same momentum corresponds to different kinetic energy mass effect kinetic energy of particles in thermalized system satisfies boltzmann distribution distribution kinetic energy particles ultra - relativistic heavy ion collisions effective thermal properties transverse kinetic energy @xmath2 distribution similar scaling behavior motivation of investigating scaling properties distributions transverse kinetic energy @xmath2 particleshope mass effect suppressed new scaling function paper scaling @xmath2 distribution protons mid - rapidity region studied compared with @xmath0 distribution essential ask why scaling behaviors for different particles potential universal dynamics string overlap mechanism explain data pion proton paper consider another mechanism parton percolation theory more information particle production in nuclear collisions paper organized relation between distributions @xmath2 @xmath0 scaling property @xmath2 distribution protons au+au collisions @xmath1 universal scaling functions for pion proton given iii discuss universal scaling functions cluster decay conclusion drawn definition transverse kinetic energy @xmath6 @xmath7 mass invariant @xmath2 distribution @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath2 equal to @xmath0 feasible consider scaling behavior @xmath0 distribution in range @xmath12/@xmath13 for pions mass @xmath14 results in @xcite excellent if @xmath7 large consider mass effect investigate scaling behaviors of @xmath2 distributions same range @xmath0 summarized method for searching scaling behavior particle s @xmath0 spectrumsimilar method investigate scaling transverse energy distribution final state particles transverse kinetic energy @xmath2 instead momentum @xmath0 define scaled variable @xmath15 spectrum @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath3 parameters fit distributions same curve values @xmath17 @xmath3 different different centralities most central collisions set 1 @xmath18 parameterization @xmath2 distribution most central au+au collisions universal scaling function all centralities independent introduce scaled variable @xmath19 normalized scaling function @xmath20 @xmath21 defined as @xmath22 check @xmath23 @xmath24 investigate scaling behavior transverse energy distribution protons mid - rapidity au+au collisions @xmath1 wide rang @xmath0 coverage all data points different centralities shifted same curve errorbar corresponding values parameters @xmath17 @xmath3 shown table i parameterize curve define @xmath25 scaling function @xmath26 after normalization @xmath27 redefined @xmath28 spectra protons mid - rapidity au+au collisions rhic feed - down corrections considered data solid curve from eq data from @xcite after calculation=45.0%parameters coalescing data points same curves figs protonfd @xmath29 pion @xmath30 cols="^^",options="header " discussed scaling properties transverse kinetic energy distributions pions protons au+au collisions 200 gev showed @xmath2 scaling behavior experimental data better @xmath0 case cluster formation decay mechanism describe spectra pion proton different centralities consistent description same parameters both species particles excluded consistent particle production mechanism other particle production mechanism scaling behavior work supported national natural science foundation china grant 10635020 10775057 ministry education china grant 306022 project irt0624
| 0.263873
| 1,528
| 793
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,541
|
we show that , by correctly selecting the probability distribution function @xmath0 for a particle s distance - to - collision , the nonclassical diffusion equation can be represented exactly by the nonclassical linear boltzmann equation for an infinite homogeneous medium .
this choice of @xmath0 preserves the _ true _
mean - squared free path of the system , which sheds new light on the results obtained in previous work .
|
a _ nonclassical linear boltzmann equation _ has been recently proposed to address particle transport problems in which the particle flux experiences a nonexponential attenuation law @xcite .
this nonexponential behavior arises in certain inhomogeneous random media in which the locations of the scattering centers are spatially correlated , such as in a pebble bed reactor core @xcite .
independent of these developments , a similar kinetic equation has been rigorously derived for the periodic lorentz gas in a series of papers by golse ( cf .
@xcite ) , and by marklof and str " ombergsson @xcite .
related work has also been performed by grosjean @xcite , considering a generalization of neutron transport that includes arbitrary path - length distributions . for the case of monoenergetic particle transport with isotropic scattering ,
the nonclassical linear boltzmann equation is written as @xmath1 , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath2 is the nonclassical angular flux , @xmath3 is the scattering ratio ( probability of scattering ) , and @xmath4 is a source . here , the total cross section @xmath5 is a function of the path length @xmath6 ( distance traveled by the particle since its previous interaction ) , such that the path length distribution @xmath7 does not have to be exponential . if @xmath0 is exponential , eq .
( [ eq1.1 ] ) reduces to the classical linear boltzmann equation @xmath8 for the classical angular flux @xmath9 it has been shown @xcite that , by selecting @xmath10 in a proper way , eq . can be converted to an integral equation for the scalar flux @xmath11 that is identical to the integral equation that can be constructed for certain diffusion - based approximations to eq . in the hierarchy of the @xmath12 equations @xcite .
the work in this paper shows that this is also the case for the _ nonclassical diffusion equation _
@xcite @xmath13 which is an asymptotic approximation of eq .
( [ eq1.1 ] ) when @xmath14 . here , @xmath15 specifically , we find @xmath0 and the corresponding @xmath10 such that the integral equation for eq .
( [ eq1.6 ] ) is identical to the integral equation for eq .
( [ eq1.1 ] ) .
we also show that the second moment of @xmath0 for nonclassical diffusion preserves the _ true _
mean - squared free path @xmath16 , which gives a new insight on the results obtained in @xcite for the classical diffusion approximations .
the remainder of this paper is organized as follows . in section [ sec2 ]
we convert eq . to an integral equation for the scalar flux given in eq . .
in section [ sec3 ] we convert eq . to an integral equation for the scalar flux , and find the correct choice of @xmath0 such that the integral equation obtained in section [ sec2 ] is identical to this nonclassical diffusion integral equation .
we also present a numerical example illustrating the differences on @xmath0 and @xmath10 for classical transport , classical diffusion , and nonclassical diffusion .
the paper concludes with a discussion in section [ sec4 ] .
let @xmath17 be given by @xmath18 where @xmath19 and @xmath20 we can now write eq . as the initial value problem [ eq2.2 ] @xmath21 following the steps presented in @xcite and @xcite , we : ( i ) use the method of characteristics to calculate the solution of eqs .
; ( ii ) operate on this solution by @xmath22 ; and ( iii ) perform the change of spatial variables from the 3-d spherical @xmath23 to the 3-d cartesian @xmath24 defined by @xmath25 .
this yields @xmath26 where @xmath27 and @xmath17 are given by eqs . and , respectively .
the nonclassical diffusion formulation presented in eq . is an asymptotic approximation of eq . in the case of @xmath28 . in this formulation ,
@xmath29 and @xmath16 as given by eq .
represent the first and second moments of the _ true _ path length distribution @xmath0 .
if @xmath0 is exponential , then @xmath30 , @xmath31 , and eq .
reduces to the classical diffusion equation @xmath32 for the general case in which @xmath0 is _ not _ assumed to be an exponential , we define @xmath33 and rewrite eq . as : [ eq3.2 ] @xmath34 where @xmath35 the green s function for the operator on the left hand side of eq .
is : @xmath36 therefore , we can transform eq . into an integral equation for @xmath37 by taking @xmath38 bearing in mind that @xmath39 represents the mean free path of a particle ( i.e. the average distance between collisions ) , the collision - rate density can be written as @xmath40 , such that @xmath41 this result agrees with eq .
iff @xmath42 it is easy to verify that @xmath43 which shows that eq . is a distribution function .
furthermore , @xmath10 is given by @xmath44 this shows that the nonclassical transport equation reproduces the nonclassical diffusion approximation given by eq . if @xmath0 and @xmath10 are defined by eqs . and .
moreover , if @xmath0 is exponential , this results agrees with the @xmath0 and @xmath10 obtained for the classical diffusion equation in @xcite .
we also point out that [ eq3.9 ] @xmath45 the first moment of @xmath0 only approximates the mean free path @xmath29 , as can be seen in eq . .
however , eq . shows that the _ true _ mean - squared free path @xmath16 is preserved .
this sheds new light on the results presented in @xcite , where the second moments of the path length distributions obtained for all ( classical ) diffusion approximations give the exact ( classical ) transport value @xmath46 .
figures [ fig1 ] and [ fig2 ] show the functions @xmath10 and @xmath0 for the transport of neutrons taking place in the interior of a homogenized 3-d pebble bed reactor core system , as described in @xcite .
the system consists of fuel spheres ( pebbles ) randomly packed in a background void with packing fraction @xmath47 .
the parameters for the material of the fuel pebbles are : diameter @xmath48 ; total cross section @xmath49 ; and scattering ratio @xmath50 . as discussed in detail in @xcite , the _ classically homogenized _ system ( using the atomic mix model ) has total cross section @xmath51 , and its _ true _ mean - squared free path is numerically calculated to be @xmath52 .
we note that nonclassical transport occurs due to the spatial correlations of the fuel pebbles in the system , and therefore @xmath53 .
we have shown that the nonclassical diffusion equation for an infinite homogeneous medium can be represented exactly by the nonclassical linear boltzmann equation with the correct choice of @xmath10 and @xmath0 .
we derived explicit expressions for these quantities and showed that , while the first moment of the path length distribution @xmath0 only approximates the true mean free path @xmath39 , its second moment _ preserves _ the true mean - squared free path @xmath16 .
this result provides a deeper understanding of the results presented in @xcite for the second moment of the path - length distributions for classical diffusion approximations .
the work on this paper allows us to construct @xmath0 and @xmath10 that yield the correct solution for the nonclassical boltzmann equation in a diffusive system .
the only parameter necessary for this is the true mean - squared free path @xmath16 .
this paves the road to the possibility of using this easy - to - obtain @xmath0 to approximate the solutions of the nonclassical boltzmann equation as the system moves away from the diffusive limit .
further work needs to be done to investigate how well such approach would perform ; this task , however , must be left for future work .
this paper was prepared by richard vasques under award number nrc - hq-84 - 14-g-0052 from the nuclear regulatory commission .
the statements , findings , conclusions , and recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view of the us nuclear regulatory commission .
r. vasques . estimating anisotropic diffusion of neutrons near the boundary of a pebble bed random system .
_ proceedings of the international conference on mathematics and computational methods applied to nuclear science & engineering - m&c 2013 [ cd - rom]_. la grange park , il : american nuclear society ; 2013 .
17361747 . c. grosjean , the exact mathematical theory of multiple scattering of particles in an infinite medium .
vlaamsche akad .
schoone kunsten belgi " e _ 36 , paleis der academi " en , brussels , 1951 .
|
nonclassical linear boltzmann equation proposed particle transport problems particle flux experiences nonexponential attenuation law behavior arises in inhomogeneous media scattering centers spatially correlated pebble bed reactor core similar kinetic equation derived for periodic lorentz gas by golse marklof ombergsson related work performed by grosjean generalization of neutron transport arbitrary path - length distributions for monoenergetic particle transport with isotropic scattering nonclassical linear boltzmann equation written as @xmath1 @xmath2 is nonclassical angular flux @xmath3 scattering ratio @xmath4 source total cross section @xmath5 is function of path length @xmath6 particle since previous interaction path length distribution not be exponential if @xmath0 exponential eq . reduces to classical linear boltzmann equation for classical angular flux shown by selecting @xmath10 eq . can be converted to integral equation for scalar flux @xmath11 identical to for certain diffusion - based approximations equationswork paper shows nonclassical diffusion equation @xcite @xmath13 asymptotic approximation of eq . eq1.1 ] @xmath14 @xmath15 find @xmath0 @xmath10 integral equation eq . eq1.6 identical to eq. eq1.1 ] second moment @xmath0 nonclassical diffusion preserves mean - free path @xmath16 insight results @xcite classical diffusion approximations remainder paper organized section sec2 convert eq . to integral equation scalar flux section sec3 convert eq . integral equation scalar flux find correct choice @xmath0 integral equation sec2 identical nonclassical diffusion equation present numerical example differences @xmath0 @xmath10 classical transport diffusion nonclassical diffusion paper concludes discussion section sec4 ] @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 write eq . as initial value problem [ eq2.2 ] @xmath21 steps use method of characteristics calculate solution eqs. operate solution by @xmath22 change spatial variables from 3-d spherical @xmath23 to 3-d cartesian @xmath24 defined @xmath25yields @xmath26 given by eqs nonclassical diffusion formulation asymptotic approximation of eq @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath16 represent first second moments of path length distribution @xmath0 if @xmath0 exponential @xmath30 eq to classical diffusion equation @xmath32 exponential define @xmath33 rewrite eq as eq3.2 ] @xmath34 @xmath35 green s function operator is @xmath36 transform eq into integral equation for @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 represents mean free path particle average distance between collisions collision - rate density written as @xmath40 @xmath41 agrees with eq . @xmath42 verify @xmath43 eq . distribution function @xmath10 given by @xmath44 nonclassical transport equation reproduces nonclassical diffusion approximation eq . @xmath0 @xmath10 defined by eqs @xmath0 exponential agrees with @xmath0 @xmath10 classical diffusion equation @xciteeq3.9 ] @xmath45 first moment @xmath0 approximates mean free path @xmath29 eq . shows true mean - squared free path @xmath16 preserved results @xcite second moments path length distributions give exact transport value @xmath46 figures fig1 fig2 show functions @xmath10 @xmath0 transport neutrons homogenized 3-d pebble bed reactor core system system consists fuel spheres pebbles randomly packed background void packing fraction @xmath47 parameters diameter @xmath48 total cross section @xmath49 scattering ratio @xmath50 classically homogenized system has total cross section @xmath51 true mean - squared free path @xmath52 nonclassical transport due spatial correlations fuel pebbles @xmath53 nonclassical diffusion equation infinite homogeneous medium represented by nonclassical linear boltzmann equation with correct choice @xmath10 and @xmath0 derived expressions quantities first moment path length distribution @xmath0 approximates true mean free path @xmath39 second moment preserves true mean - squared free path @xmath16result provides understanding @xcite path - length distributions classical diffusion approximations work allows construct @xmath0 @xmath10 correct solution nonclassical boltzmann equation diffusive system only parameter mean - free path @xmath16 paves road using easy @xmath0 approximate solutions nonclassical boltzmann equation system moves diffusive limit further work needs approach left future work paper prepared richard vasques award nrc - hq-84 - 14-g-0052 nuclear regulatory commission statements findings conclusions recommendations author not reflect view nuclear regulatory commission vasques estimating anisotropic diffusion neutrons near boundary pebble bed random system proceedings international conference mathematics computational methods nuclear science engineering 2013 la grange park il american nuclear society 2013 c. grosjean exact mathematical theory multiple scattering particles infinite medium vlaamsche akad . schoone kunsten paleis brussels 1951
| 0.314275
| 2,015
| 1,045
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,548
|
from the famous experiments of stern and gerlach to the present , measurements of magnetic dipole moments , and searches for electric dipole moments of `` elementary '' particles have played a major role in our understanding of sub - atomic physics . in this
talk i discuss the progress on measurements and theory of the magnetic dipole moments of the electron and muon .
i also discuss a new proposal to search for a permanent electric dipole moment ( edm ) of the muon and put it into the more general context of other edm searches .
2@xmath0 address=roberts@bu.edu + department of physics + boston university + boston , ma 02215 usa
|
over the past 82 years , the study of dipole moments of elementary particles has provided a wealth of information on subatomic physics . from the pioneering work of stern@xcite through the discovery of the large anomalous magnetic moments of the proton@xcite and neutron@xcite
, the ground work was laid for the discovery of spin , of radiative corrections and the renormalizable theory of qed , of the quark structure of baryons and the development of qcd .
a charged particle with spin @xmath1 has a magnetic moment @xmath2 where @xmath3 is called the gyromagnetic ratio .
the expression in the middle is the quantity one finds listed in the particle data tables.@xcite the quantity @xmath4 is the anomalous magnetic dipole moment ( or simply the anomaly ) which is related to the @xmath5-factor in the right - hand equation .
the dirac equation tells us that @xmath6 for spin angular momentum , and is unity for orbital angular momentum ( the latter having been verified experimentally@xcite ) .
this can be seen from the non - relativistic reduction for an electron in a weak magnetic field : @xmath7 \psi , \ ] ] and the subscript on @xmath5 is dropped in the following discussion . for point particles ,
the anomaly arises from radiative corrections , three examples of which are shown in fig .
[ fg : radcor ] .
the `` vertex '' correction and vacuum polarization are important in the lepton anomaly , while the self - energy term is included in the dressed mass .
the situation for baryons is quite different , since their internal quark structure gives them large anomalies .
the vertex correction in lowest - order gives the famous schwinger@xcite result , @xmath8 , which was verified experimentally by foley and kusch.@xcite to lowest order , the s - matrix element@xcite for a charged particle in a magnetic field is given by @xmath9 u(p ) a^{\lambda}(q)\ ] ] in general @xmath4 ( or @xmath5 ) is an expansion in @xmath10 , @xmath11 with 1 diagram for the schwinger ( second - order ) contribution , 5 for the fourth order , 40 for the sixth order , 891 for the eighth order .
the qed contributions to electron and muon 2 have now been calculated through eighth order , @xmath12 and the the tenth - order contribution has been estimated.@xcite the first few orders are shown schematically below in fig . [
fg : aexpan ] . .
] while magnetic dipole moments ( mdms ) are a natural property of charged particles with spin , electric dipole moments ( edms ) are forbidden both by parity and by time reversal symmetry .
interestingly enough , purcell and ramsey@xcite suggested in 1950 that a measurement of the neutron edm would be a good way to search for parity violation , well in advance of the paper by lee and yang . after the discovery of parity violation , landau@xcite and ramsey@xcite pointed out that an edm would violate both _
t _ symmetries .
this can be seen by examining the hamiltonian for a spin one - half particle in the presence of both an electric and magnetic field , @xmath13 .
the transformation properties of @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 and @xmath17 are given in the table [ tb : tranprop ] , and we see that while @xmath18 is even under all three , @xmath19 is odd under both _
_ t_. thus the existence of an edm implies that both _ p _ and _ t _ are violated . in the context of _ cpt _ symmetry ,
an edm implies _ cp _ violation .
the standard model value for the electron and muon edm is @xmath20 @xmath21-cm , well beyond the reach of experiments ( which are at the @xmath22 @xmath21-cm level ) .
observation of a non - zero @xmath21 or @xmath23 edm would be a clear signal for new physics .
.transformation properties of the magnetic and electric fields and dipole moments . [ cols="^,^,^,^ " , ] a new experiment to search for a permanent edm of the muon with a design sensitivity of @xmath24 @xmath21-cm is now being planned for j - parc.@xcite this sensitivity lies well within values predicted by susy models.@xcite feng , et al.,@xcite have calculated the range of @xmath25 available to such an experiment , which is shown in fig .
[ fg : phicp ] .
available to a dedicated muon edm experiment.@xcite the two bands show the one and two standard - deviation ranges if @xmath26 differs from the standard model value by @xmath27 . ] with an edm present , the spin precession relative to the momentum is given by @xmath28 + { e \over m}\left [ { \eta \over 2 } \left ( { \vec e \over c } + \vec \beta \times \vec b \right ) \right ] \label{eq : omegawedm}\ ] ] where @xmath29 and @xmath30 . for reasonable values of @xmath31 , the motional electric field
@xmath32 is much larger than electric fields that can be obtained in the laboratory , and the two vector frequencies are orthogonal to each other .
the edm has two effects on the precession : the magnitude of the observed frequency is increased , and the precession plane is tipped relative to the magnetic field .
e821 was operated at the magic @xmath33 so that the focusing electric field did not cause a spin precession .
the edm signal in e821 is very difficult to observe , since the tipping of the precession plane is very small ( @xmath34 mrad ) .
the dedicated experiment will be operated at 500 mev / c , off of the magic @xmath33 , and will use a radial electric field to stop the @xmath0 precession . thus the edm would cause a steady build - up of the spin out of the plane with time .
detectors would be placed above and below the storage region , and a time - dependent up - down asymmetry would be the signal of an edm .
measurements of the muon and electron anomalies played an important role in our understanding of sub - atomic physics in the 20th century .
the electron anomaly was tied closely to the development of qed .
the subsequent measurement of the muon anomaly showed that the muon was indeed a `` heavy electron '' which obeyed qed.@xcite with the sub - ppm accuracy now available for the muon anomaly,@xcite there may be indications that new physics is beginning to appear .
marciano@xcite has pointed out that using a few very well measured standard model parameters , rather than a global fit to all electroweak measurements , predicts a higgs mass which is much smaller than the present experimental limit from lep .
if one argues that any discrepancy between the standard model value of @xmath26 and the experimental one is an indication that the hadronic contribution has been underestimated , and uses this discrepancy to `` determine the hadronic contribution '' , the higgs mass limit gets even smaller .
marciano concludes that `` hints of ` new physics ' may be starting to appear in quantum loop effects . ''
the non - observation of an electron edm is becoming an issue for supersymmetry , just as the non - observation of a neutron edm implies such a mysteriously ( some would say un - naturally ) small @xmath35-parameter for qcd .
the search for edms will continue , and if one is observed , the motivation for further searches in other systems will be even stronger .
the muon presents a unique opportunity to observe an edm in a second - generation particle , where the _ cp _ phase might be different from the first generation , or the scaling with mass might be quadratic rather than linear .
it is clear that the study of lepton moments ( and neutron edm searches ) will continue to be a topic of great importance in the first part of the 21st century .
both the theoretical and experimental situations are evolving .
stay tuned for further developments .
i wish to thank my colleagues on the muon 2 experiment , as well as m. davier , e. de rafael , g. gabrielse , w. marciano , and b. odum for helpful discussions .
special thanks go to r. carey and d. hertzog for their helpful comments on this manuscript .
m. davier , s. eidelman , a. hcker , and z. zhang , eur .
phys j. * c 27 * 497 ( 2003 ) .
see k. hagiwara , a.d .
martin , d. nomura , and t. teubner phys . lett . *
b557 * , 69 ( 2003 ) for an independent analysis of the @xmath36 data .
marc knecht , andreas nyffeler , phys .
* d65 * , 073034 ( 2002 ) ; m. knecht , a. nyffeler , m. perrottet , e. de rafael , phys .
88 * , 071802 ( 2002 ) , j. bijnens , e. pallante , and j. prades , nucl .
* b626 * , 410 ( 2002 ) ; m. hayakawa and t. kinoshita hep - ph/0112102 , ( 2002 ) , i. blokland , a. czarnecki and k. melinkov phys .
88 * , 071803 ( 2002 ) , and references therin .
|
past 82 years study dipole moments particles provided information subatomic physics stern@xcite large anomalous magnetic moments proton neutron@xcite ground work for discovery spin radiative corrections renormalizable theory qed quark structure baryons development qcd charged particle with spin @xmath1 has magnetic moment @xmath2 @xmath3 gyromagnetic ratio expression middle quantity particle data tables @xmath4 anomalous magnetic dipole moment related to @xmath5-factor right - equation dirac equation @xmath6 spin angular momentum unity orbital angular momentum verified experimentally non - relativistic reduction electron in weak magnetic field @xmath7 subscript @xmath5 dropped point particles anomaly arises from radiative corrections examples shown in fig . vertex correction vacuum polarization important in lepton anomaly self - energy term in dressed mass baryons different internal quark structure large anomalies vertex correction gives famous schwinger@xcite result @xmath8 verified experimentally by foley kusch@xcite lowest order s - matrix element for charged particle in magnetic field given by @xmath9 u(p ) a^{\lambda}(q) @xmath4 or @xmath5 expansion in @xmath10 @xmath11 1 diagram for schwinger second contribution 5 fourth 40 sixth 891 eighth order qed contributions to electron muon 2 calculated through eighth order @xmath12 tenth - order contribution estimated first orders shown in fig . magnetic dipole moments natural property of charged particles spin electric dipole moments edms forbidden by parity time reversal symmetry purcell ramsey suggested 1950 measurement of neutron edm search for parity violation lee yang discovery parity violation landau ramsey edm violate both t symmetries examining hamiltonian for spin one - half particle electric magnetic field @xmath13 transformation properties of @xmath14 @xmath15 in table @xmath18 even under all three @xmath19 odd under both edm implies both p t _ violated symmetry edm implies cp _ violationstandard model value for electron muon edm is @xmath20-cm beyond reach experiments @xmath22 @xmath21-cm level non - zero @xmath21 or @xmath23 edm signal for new physics.transformation properties of magnetic electric fields dipole moments new experiment for permanent edm muon with design sensitivity @xmath24 @xmath21-cm planned for j - parc within values susy models feng al. calculated range of @xmath25 available experiment shown in fig . dedicated muon edm experiment two bands show one two standard - deviation ranges if @xmath26 differs from standard model value by @xmath27 edm present spin precession relative to momentum by @xmath28 + @xmath29 @xmath30 for reasonable values @xmath31 motional electric field @xmath32 larger than electric fields laboratory two vector frequencies orthogonal edm effects precession magnitude observed frequency increased precession plane tipped relative to magnetic field e821 operated at @xmath33 focusing electric field cause spin precessionedm signal in e821 difficult to observe tipping precession plane small ( @xmath34 mrad ) dedicated experiment operated at 500 mev / c off magic @xmath33 radial electric field to stop @xmath0 precession edm build - up spin plane with time detectors placed above and below storage region time - dependent up - down asymmetry signal of edm measurements muon electron anomalies important in understanding sub - atomic physics 20th century electron anomaly tied to development of qed subsequent measurement muon anomaly showed heavy electron obeyed qed. sub - ppm accuracy for muon indications new physics appear marciano well measured standard model parameters global predicts higgs mass smaller than experimental limit from lep discrepancy between standard model value @xmath26 experimental hadronic contribution underestimated higgs mass limit smaller marciano concludes hints of new physics appear in quantum loop effects non - observation of electron edm issue for supersymmetry - observation neutron edm implies small @xmath35-parameter for qcd search for edms if observed motivation for searches stronger muon opportunity observe edm second - generation particle cp phase different scaling mass quadratic study lepton moments neutron edm searches 21st century theoretical experimental situations evolving stay tuned developments colleagues muon 2 experiment m. davier e. de rafael g. gabrielse w. marciano b. odum thanks to r. carey d. hertzog comments m. davier s. eidelman a. hcker z. zhang phys j. 27 ( 2003 ) see k. hagiwara a martin d. nomura t. teubner phys . lett b557 69 ( 2003 ) independent analysis @xmath36 data marc knecht andreas nyffeler phys d65 073034 ( 2002 ) knecht nyffeler perrottet. de rafael 88 071802 2002 j. bijnens e. pallante j. prades b626 410 ( 2002 ) m. hayakawa t. kinoshita ph/0112102 2002 i. blokland a. czarnecki k. melinkov phys . 88 071803 2002
| 0.318125
| 2,106
| 1,067
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,558
|
we review a recently proposed approach to the problem of alternating signs for fermionic many body monte carlo simulations in finite temperature simulations .
we derive an estimate for fermion wandering lengths and introduce the notion of permutation zones , special regions of the lattice where identical fermions may interchange and outside of which they may not . using successively larger permutation zones , one can extrapolate to obtain thermodynamic observables in regimes where direct simulation is impossible .
|
the zone method approach to the fermion sign problem is based on the observation that in many finite temperature simulations fermion permutations are short ranged @xcite .
this can be true even for systems with massless modes and long distance correlations , as we demonstrate with an explicit example . in this proceedings article
we derive an estimate for the finite temperature fermion wandering length and discuss the main features of the zone method .
we begin with a brief review of the worldline formalism @xcite .
we introduce ideas in one spatial dimension before moving on to higher dimensions .
let us consider a system with one species of fermion on a periodic chain with @xmath0 sites , where @xmath0 is even . aside from an additive constant ,
the general hamiltonian can be written as @xmath1 + \sum_{i}c_{i}a_{i}^{\dagger } a_{i}.\ ] ] following @xcite we break the hamiltonian into two parts , @xmath2 and @xmath3 , @xmath4 .
\nonumber\ ] ] we note that @xmath5 . for large @xmath6 , we can write @xmath7 where @xmath8 inserting a complete set of states at each step , we can write @xmath9 $ ] as @xmath10 the worldline trajectory of each of the fermions can now be traced from euclidean time @xmath11 to time @xmath12 .
since we are computing a thermal trace , the worldlines from @xmath11 to @xmath12 define a permutation of identical fermions .
even permutations carry a fermion sign of @xmath13 while odd permutations carry sign @xmath14 .
the generalization to higher dimensions is straightforward . in two dimensions , for example
, @xmath15 takes the form @xmath16
\right ] ^{n } \\
\qquad \qquad \qquad \approx ( s_{\text{o}}^{y}s_{\text{e}}^{y}s_{\text{o}% } ^{x}s_{\text{e}}^{x})^{n}. \end{array } \right . \label{2d}\ ] ]
in one spatial dimension , the pauli exclusion principle inhibits fermion permutations except in cases where the fermions wrap around the lattice boundary . for the remainder of our discussion , therefore , we consider systems with two or more dimensions . the first question we address is how far fermion worldlines can wander from start time @xmath11 to end time @xmath17 .
we can put an upper bound on this wandering distance by considering the special case with no on - site potential and only nearest neighbor hopping .
let us consider motion in the @xmath18-direction .
for each factor of @xmath19 in ( [ 2d ] ) a given fermion may remain at the same @xmath18 value , move one lattice space to the left , or move one lattice space to the right . if @xmath20 is the hopping parameter , then for large @xmath6 the relative weights for these possibilities are approximately @xmath21 for remaining at the same @xmath18 value , @xmath22 for one move to the left , and @xmath23 for one move to the right . in ( [ 2d ] )
we see that there are @xmath6 factors of @xmath24 . therefore for a typical worldline configuration at low filling fraction , @xmath25
we expect @xmath26 hops to the left and @xmath26 hops to the right . for
non - negligible @xmath27 some of the hops are forbidden by the exclusion principle .
assuming random filling we expect @xmath28 hops to the left and @xmath29 hops to the right .
the net displacement is equivalent to a random walk with @xmath30 steps .
the expected wandering length , @xmath31 is therefore given by @xmath32 in cases with on - site potentials , fermion hopping is dampened by differences in potential energy .
hence the estimate ( @xmath33 ) serves as an upper bound for the general case .
we have checked the upper bound numerically using simulation data generated by many different lattice hamiltonians with and without on - site potentials .
let @xmath34 be the logarithm of the partition function , @xmath35 \right\ } .\ ] ] let us partition the spatial lattice , @xmath36 , into zones @xmath37 such that the spatial dimensions of each zone are much greater than @xmath38 . for notational convenience
we define @xmath39 . for any @xmath40 ,
let @xmath41 be the logarithm of a restricted partition function that includes only worldline configurations such that any worldline starting at @xmath11 outside of @xmath42 returns to the same point at @xmath12 .
in other words there are no permutations for worldlines starting outside of @xmath42 .
we note that @xmath43 and @xmath44 is the logarithm of the restricted partition function with no worldline permutations at all . since the zones are much larger than the length scale @xmath38 , the worldline permutations in one zone has little or no effect on the worldline permutations in another zones . therefore @xmath45 using a telescoping series , we obtain @xmath46 @xmath47 for translationally invariant systems tiled with congruent zones we find @xmath48 where @xmath49 , the number of zones
. for general zone shapes one can imagine partitioning the zones themselves into smaller congruent tiles
. therefore the result ( [ est ] ) should hold for large arbitrarily shaped zones . for this case
we take @xmath50 to be the number of nearest neighbor bonds in the entire lattice and @xmath51 to be the number of nearest neighbor bonds in the zone .
we will refer to @xmath51 as the zone size of @xmath52 .
this is just one choice for zone extrapolation .
a more precise and complicated scheme could be devised which takes into account the circumscribed volume , number of included lattice points , and other geometric quantities . as an example of the permutation zone method
, we compute the average energy @xmath53 for a free fermion hamiltonian with only hopping on an @xmath54 lattice .
we set the number of time steps @xmath55 and consider values @xmath56 , @xmath57 , and @xmath58 .
the corresponding values for @xmath38 are @xmath59 , @xmath60 , and @xmath61 respectively .
the monte carlo updates were performed using our own version of the single - cluster loop algorithm @xcite . in figure 1
we show data for rectangular zones with side dimensions @xmath62 , @xmath63 , @xmath64 , @xmath65 , @xmath66 , @xmath67 , ... , @xmath68 .
we also show a least - squares fit ( not including the smallest zones @xmath62 and @xmath63 ) assuming linear dependence on zone size as predicted in ( [ est ] ) .
we find agreement at the @xmath69 level or better when compared with the exact answers shown on the far right , which were computed using momentum - space decomposition . while the physics of the free hopping hamiltonian is trivial , the computational problems are in fact maximally difficult .
the severity of the sign problem can be measured in terms of the average sign , @xmath70sign@xmath71 , for contributions to the partition function . for @xmath56 , @xmath70sign@xmath72 for @xmath73 , @xmath70sign@xmath71 @xmath74 and for @xmath75 , sign@xmath76 .
direct calculation using position - space monte carlo is impossible by several orders of magnitude for @xmath77 .
we have reviewed the zone method approach to the fermion sign problem .
we have demonstrated that the exchange of identical fermions is short - ranged and has a maximum range of @xmath78 lattice sites , where @xmath79 is the inverse temperature , @xmath20 is the hopping parameter , and @xmath80 is the filling fraction . we have introduced the notion of permutation zones , special regions of the lattice where identical fermions may interchange and outside of which they may not . using successively larger permutation zones , one can extrapolate to obtain thermodynamic observables .
applications of the zone method to chiral symmetry breaking in ( 2 + 1 ) dimensional qed is discussed in another article in these proceedings @xcite .
h. g. evertz , to appear in _ numerical methods of lattice quantum many - body problems _ , edited by d. j. scalapino , perseus , berlin , 2001 ; h. g. evertz , g. lana , m. marcu , phys .
lett . * 70 * , 875 ( 1993 ) ; h. g. evertz , m. marcu in _
quantum monte carlo methods in condensed matter physics _ , p. 65 , edited by m. suzuki , world scientific , 1994 .
|
zone method approach fermion sign problem based on finite temperature simulations fermion permutations short ranged true even for massless modes long distance correlations explicit example article estimate for finite temperature fermion wandering length discuss features zone method review worldline formalism introduce ideas spatial dimension before higher dimensions consider system with one species fermion on periodic chain with @xmath0 sites even general hamiltonian written as @xmath1 + break hamiltonian into two parts @xmath2 @xmath3 large @xmath6 write @xmath7 write @xmath9 as @xmath10 worldline trajectory of fermions traced from euclidean time @xmath11 to time @xmath12 thermal trace worldlines from @xmath11 to @xmath12 define permutation of identical fermions even permutations carry fermion sign @xmath13 odd permutations carry sign @xmath14 generalization to higher dimensions straightforwardtwo dimensions @xmath15 form @xmath16 \right\qquad\approx s_{\text{o}}^{y}s ^{x}s_^{x})^{n}. \end{array } \right\label{2d} one spatial dimension pauli exclusion principle inhibits fermion permutations except fermions wrap around lattice boundary consider systems two or more dimensions fermion worldlines wander start @xmath11 to end @xmath17 upper bound wandering distance special case no on - site potential nearest neighbor hopping consider motion @xmath18-direction each factor @xmath19 2d fermion remain same @xmath18 value move left or right @xmath20 hopping parameter large @xmath6 relative weights approximately @xmath21 same @xmath18 value @xmath22 one move left @xmath23 one move right 2d @xmath6 factors of @xmath24 typical worldline configuration low filling fraction @xmath25 @xmath26 hops left @xmath26 right non - negligible @xmath27 hops forbidden by exclusion principlerandom filling expect @xmath28 left @xmath29 right net displacement equivalent random walk @xmath30 steps expected wandering length @xmath31 given by @xmath32 site potentials fermion hopping dampened differences potential energy estimate @xmath33 upper bound general case checked upper bound numerically simulation data lattice hamiltonians without site potentials @xmath34 logarithm partition function partition spatial lattice @xmath36 into zones spatial dimensions greater than @xmath38 define @xmath39 @xmath41 logarithm restricted partition function worldline configurations worldline starting @xmath11 outside @xmath42 returns same @xmath12 no permutations worldlines outside @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 logarithm restricted partition function no worldline permutations zones larger than length scale @xmath38 worldline permutations one zone effect @xmath45 telescoping series obtain @xmath46 @xmath47 translationally invariant systems congruent zones find @xmath48 @xmath49 number of zones zone shapes partitioning zones into smaller congruent tiles result ( [ est ] large arbitrarily shaped zonestake @xmath50 nearest neighbor bonds lattice @xmath51 zone refer @xmath51 zone size of @xmath52 one choice for zone extrapolation precise scheme circumscribed volume lattice points geometric quantities permutation zone method compute average energy @xmath53 for free fermion hamiltonian hopping on @xmath54 lattice set time steps @xmath55 consider values @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 values for @xmath38 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 monte carlo updates using single - cluster loop algorithm @xcite figure 1 data for rectangular zones with side dimensions @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 least - squares fit smallest zones @xmath62 linear dependence on zone size agreement at @xmath69 level with exact answers far right computed using momentum - space decomposition physics of free hopping hamiltonian trivial computational problems difficult severity sign problem measured average sign @xmath70sign@xmath71 contributions partition function@xmath56 @xmath70sign@xmath72 @xmath73@xmath71 @xmath74 @xmath75@xmath76 direct calculation position - space monte carlo impossible @xmath77 reviewed zone method fermion sign problem demonstrated exchange identical fermions short - ranged maximum @xmath78 lattice sites @xmath79 inverse temperature @xmath20 hopping parameter @xmath80 filling fraction introduced permutation zones identical fermions interchange larger permutation zones thermodynamic observables applications zone method chiral symmetry breaking 2 + 1 ) dimensional qed discussed article g. evertz numerical methods lattice quantum many - body problems scalapino perseus berlin 2001 evertz lana marcu phys . lett 70 875 1993 ) evertz marcu quantum monte carlo methods condensed matter physics p. 65. suzuki world scientific 1994
| 0.312771
| 1,978
| 1,031
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,565
|
we report thermal - expansion and specific - heat data of the series la@xmath0ca@xmath1coo@xmath2 for @xmath3 . for @xmath4
the thermal - expansion coefficient @xmath5 features a pronounced maximum around @xmath6k caused by a temperature - dependent spin - state transition from a low - spin state ( @xmath7 ) at low temperatures towards a higher spin state of the co@xmath8 ions .
the partial substitution of the la@xmath8 ions by divalent ca@xmath9 ions causes drastic changes in the macroscopic properties of lacoo@xmath2 . around @xmath10
the large maximum in @xmath5 has completely vanished . with further increasing @xmath11 three different anomalies develop
. 75.40,65.70 , specific heat , thermal expansion , spin - state transition , metal - insulator transition , double - exchange mechanism
|
lacoo@xmath2 crystallizes in a rhombohedral symmetry ( r@xmath12c ) and has quite unusual physical properties . at low temperatures it features a nonmagnetic and insulating ground state . with increasing temperature
a paramagnetic moment develops which causes a maximum in the susceptibility around 100k @xcite .
this is usually explained in terms of a temperature - driven spin - state transition of the co@xmath8 ions which can occur in three different spin configurations : a low - spin ( ls ) ( @xmath13 , @xmath7 ) , an intermediate - spin ( is ) ( @xmath14 , @xmath15 ) , or a high - spin state ( hs ) ( @xmath16 , @xmath17 ) . at low temperatures a ls ground state is realized .
the nature of the spin state at higher temperatures is controversially discussed , e.g. @xcite .
the spin - state transition causes also a large additional schottky - like contribution to the thermal expansion of lacoo@xmath2 @xcite .
the substitution of la@xmath8 by an amount @xmath11 of divalent ca , sr , or ba ions influences this contribution and leads to a strong suppression of the spin - state transition .
furthermore all doping series show long - range ferromagnetic order and metallic behavior at higher doping levels @xmath18 . in the case of ca doping ,
ferromagnetic behavior is observed for the insulating compounds @xmath19 , too @xcite .
ca@xmath1coo@xmath2 for ( a ) @xmath20 , ( b ) @xmath21 , ( c ) @xmath22 and ( d ) @xmath23 .
the curve for @xmath24 is shown in each panel .
the black circles denote the critical temperatures @xmath25 of the onset of ferromagnetic order which have been taken from the magnetization data given in ref .
@xcite . ] in fig .
[ tad ] the temperature dependence of the linear thermal - expansion coefficient @xmath26 of la@xmath0ca@xmath1coo@xmath2 is shown .
[ tad](a ) clearly reveals that the pronounced maximum in the thermal - expansion data of the undoped compound ( @xmath4 ) is strongly suppressed with increasing doping concentration @xmath11 . above @xmath27 this indication of the spin - state transition
has completely vanished .
instead several anomalies develop ( figs .
[ tad](b ) ( d ) ) : the curves for @xmath28 exhibit two distinct minima and for @xmath29 additional kinks occur .
the low - temperature minimum ( ltm ) shifts with increasing @xmath11 to lower whereas the high - temperature minimum ( htm ) moves to higher temperatures . for @xmath30 we could observe only the onset of the decrease in @xmath5 , because the anomaly has shifted out of the available temperature interval , i.e. @xmath31k , for higher doping concentrations . obtained from x - ray diffraction data of la@xmath32ca@xmath33coo@xmath2 :
the arrows indicate whether the data was taken with increasing or decreasing temperature .
the lines are to guide the eyes . ] at room temperature a doping induced structural phase transition from rhombohedral ( r@xmath12c , @xmath34 ) to orthorhombic symmetry ( pbnm , @xmath35 ) is observed @xcite .
this transition shifts to lower temperatures for smaller @xmath11 .
[ roentg ] shows the temperature dependence of the structural phase fractions for @xmath36 which was obtained from x - ray diffraction data .
it reveals a first - order phase transition .
the htm for @xmath36 occurs at @xmath37k which coincides with the crossover from r@xmath12c to pbnm in the x - ray data .
therefore the occurrence of the htm in @xmath5 can be attributed to a doping - induced structural phase transition . in fig .
[ tad ] , the circles ( @xmath38 ) mark the onset of ferromagnetic order .
the critical temperatures @xmath25 of the magnetic transitions have been taken from the @xmath39 data given in ref .
they match the occurrence of the kinks in @xmath5 for @xmath24 and @xmath40 ( figs .
[ tad](c ) , ( d ) ) .
therefore we conclude that the kink anomalies in the thermal - expansion data result from the onset of long - range ferromagnetic order . of la@xmath0ca@xmath1coo@xmath2
: @xmath41 and @xmath42 mark the occurrence of the ltm and htm in @xmath5 , @xmath38 signals the ferromagnetic phase transition .
panel ( b ) shows an enlarged view of the intermediate doping region @xmath43 . for clarity the different data sets
are shifted by 0.1j / molk@xmath44 with respect to each other . ] in fig .
[ cpt ] specific - heat data @xmath45 of la@xmath0ca@xmath1coo@xmath2 is presented .
one can identify several anomalies , too , although they are much less pronounced than in @xmath5 .
the temperatures of the minima in @xmath5 ( ltm : @xmath41 , htm : @xmath42 ) and the onset of ferromagnetic order ( @xmath38 ) are denoted .
[ cpt](b ) gives an expanded view for @xmath43 .
please note , that for clarity the different data sets for @xmath46 are shifted by 0.1j / molk@xmath44 with respect to each other . for @xmath47
all compounds feature one or more weak anomalies in @xmath45 , which coincide with the anomalies in @xmath5 . for @xmath36 and 0.17
the ltm and the magnetic phase transition occur at similar temperatures . in the @xmath5 data of the higher doped specimens
the onset of ferromagnetism is indicated by kinks .
these kinks might be hidden by the large ltm anomalies for @xmath36 and 0.17
. therefore one can not distinguish if the anomalies in @xmath45 for these two compounds are caused by the magnetic or a different transition .
for @xmath48 the specific - heat data features only a weak shoulder around the temperature of the corresponding ltm .
the anomalies visible in the data of the higher doped compounds @xmath35 are clearly related to the ferromagnetic phase transition .
the structural phase transition shifts with increasing @xmath11 to higher temperatures and causes in both quantities clear anomalies .
the appearance of the htm in @xmath5 ( @xmath42 ) and of the maxima at higher temperatures in @xmath45 take place at similar temperatures . for @xmath49
one can see a weak maximum in the specific - heat data above room temperature which agrees with the onset of a minimum in the thermal - expansion data .
the origin of the ltm which is visible in @xmath5 is not clear yet .
this anomaly vanishes for @xmath50 and possibly does not affect the specific heat .
the investigation of its origin is still under progress and will be reported elsewhere . in summary ,
we have studied the influence of hole doping on the series la@xmath0ca@xmath1coo@xmath2 by thermal - expansion and specific - heat measurements .
depending on the concentration @xmath11 we observe up to three distinct anomalies .
one of them is related to the ferromagnetic ordering , while a second one arises from a first - order structural phase transition .
the origin of the third anomaly remains to be clarified .
this work was supported by the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft through sfb 608 .
|
lacoo@xmath2 crystallizes rhombohedral symmetry unusual physical properties low temperatures nonmagnetic insulating ground state increasing temperature paramagnetic moment develops maximum susceptibility around 100k explained temperature - driven spin - state transition of co@xmath8 ions in three spin configurations low - intermediate - high - spin low temperatures ls ground state realized nature spin state at higher temperatures controversially discussed spin - state transition causes large schottky - like contribution to thermal expansion of lacoo@xmath2 substitution of la@xmath8 by divalent ca sr ba ions influences contribution spin - state transition doping series show long - range ferromagnetic order metallic behavior at higher doping levels ca doping ferromagnetic behavior observed for insulating compounds @xmath19 @xmath1coo@xmath2 for @xmath20 curve for @xmath24 shown in each panel black circles denote critical temperatures @xmath25 of onset of ferromagnetic order taken from magnetization data fig temperature dependence of linear thermal - expansion coefficient @xmath26 shown maximum thermal - expansion data undoped compound @xmath4 suppressed with increasing doping concentration @xmath11 above @xmath27 spin - state transition vanished anomalies develop curves for @xmath28 exhibit two minima @xmath29 kinks occur low - temperature minimum shifts with @xmath11 to lower high - temperature minimum moves to higher temperatures @xmath30 onset decrease in @xmath5 anomaly shifted out temperature interval for higher doping concentrations from x - ray diffraction data@xmath32ca arrows indicate data or temperature room temperature doping induced structural phase transition from rhombohedral to orthorhombic symmetry observed transition shifts to lower temperatures for smaller @xmath11 temperature dependence of structural phase fractions for @xmath36 reveals first - order phase transition htm for @xmath36 occurs at @xmath37k coincides with crossover from@xmath12c to pbnm occurrence htm in @xmath5 to doping - induced structural phase transitionfig . circles @xmath38 mark onset ferromagnetic order critical temperatures @xmath25 magnetic transitions taken from @xmath39 data match kinks in @xmath5 @xmath24 @xmath40 kink anomalies thermal - expansion data result from onset long - range ferromagnetic order @xmath41 @xmath42 mark occurrence ltm htm @xmath5 @xmath38 signals ferromagnetic phase transition panel ) shows enlarged view intermediate doping region @xmath43 data sets shifted by 0.1j / molk@xmath44 fig . specific - heat data @xmath45 presented anomalies less pronounced than temperatures minima in @xmath5 ltm htm onset ferromagnetic order @xmath38 ) denoted expanded view for @xmath43 data sets @xmath46 shifted by 0.1j / molk@xmath44 @xmath47 compounds feature weak anomalies @xmath45 coincide with anomalies @xmath5 @xmath36 0.17 ltm magnetic phase transition occur similar temperatures @xmath5 data higher doped specimens onset ferromagnetism indicated by kinkskinks hidden by large ltm anomalies @xmath36 and 0.17 distinguish anomalies @xmath45 caused magnetic or different transition @xmath48 heat data weak shoulder around temperature ltm anomalies higher doped compounds @xmath35 related to ferromagnetic phase transition structural phase transition shifts @xmath11 higher temperatures causes anomalies htm in @xmath5 maxima at higher @xmath45 similar temperatures @xmath49 weak maximum above room temperature agrees with minimum thermal - expansion data origin of ltm in @xmath5 clear anomaly vanishes for @xmath50 affect specific heat investigation origin under progress reported studied influence hole doping on series@xmath0ca@xmath1coo@xmath2 thermal - expansion specific - heat measurements concentration @xmath11 three anomalies one related to ferromagnetic ordering second from first order structural phase transition origin third anomaly work supported by deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft through sfb 608
| 0.266914
| 1,710
| 842
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,570
|
using dynamic paraboloid model of earth s magnetosphere , a large set of particles trajectory computations was performed . based on its result ,
the numerical algorithm for calculating effective cutoff rigidity dependence on empiric parameters has been developed for further use in magnetospheric transmission calculations .
_ keywords : cutoff rigidity , dynamic paraboloid model , magnetospheric transmission , radiation condition on leo _
|
radiation condition onboard leo spacecrafts is determined , particularly , by the charged particles penetrating from outside of the magnetosphere .
the measure of such a process in any given near - earth space location is a local geomagnetic cutoff rigidity value . in this work we assume , that `` cutoff rigidity '' phrase denotes an effective vertical cutoff rigidity ( @xmath0 ) , which value is gained from calculated discrete penumbra structure by ordinary technique using white spectra ( for example , @xcite ) .
it is well known , that magnitude of @xmath0 and penetration boundaries position depend on local time and different magnetospheric condition - related parameters @xcite .
cutoff rigidity value s variations can be measured in experiments or obtained by some type of computation using earth s magnetosphere model . however , usual method for @xmath0 calculation is based on resource consuming trajectory computation technique @xcite . in this work
we offer the method to calculate @xmath0 with accounting for local time and main empirical parameters , that characterizes magnetospheric condition , in any point of near - earth s space . for the applications where @xmath0 calculation is often needed ( e.g. transmissions for leos ) our method provides a huge speedup in comparison with direct trajectory computations .
the only things needed for the method are the igrf rigidity in exploring point and rigidity attenuation @xcite quotient s dependence on empirical parameters .
the first one can be obtained using interpolation in @xmath1 tabulated data ( see , for example , @xcite ) , which is regularly updated for coming epochs . and the second can be obtained only once by using particle trajectory computations in corresponding numerical magnetospheric model . in our case
the dynamic paraboloid model @xcite of earth s magnetosphere was chosen for solution of the problem .
we have adopted in our work the cutoff rigidity attenuation formalism @xcite , which has already successfully applied @xcite for transmission calculations using tsyganenko-89 @xcite model .
the rigidity attenuation quotient @xmath2 in our case is calculated as @xmath3 where @xmath4 value corresponds the set of model parameters for non - disturbed magnetosphere condition , and @xmath5 is correspond to some set of varied parameters regarding to quiet ones . as it was wordlessly postulated in @xcite , the @xmath2 dependence on point s geographical position
might not be taken into account because it is relatively small .
generally , it seems to be true at least for @xmath6 gv with good enough accuracy ( error s order is about percents even for lowest @xmath7 in this range ) .
hence , the approach of calculating a world - wide @xmath0 grid can be essentially simplified .
the algorithm we propose for obtaining @xmath8 in given point contains 3 stages : * calculating @xmath1 for the given point ; for practical needs , the interpolation in pre - calculated grid for some altitude @xmath9 is often used , it is especially easy when large amount of results is needed quickly .
the formula @xmath10 can be applied to transform @xmath1 value to new altitude @xmath11 . * calculating a model - dependent cutoff rigidity attenuation quotient + @xmath12 by interpolation in pre - calculated @xmath13 database ( or by extrapolation if @xmath1 value is out of applied basic @xmath1 array , see appendix ) * computing the resulting value @xmath14 table of @xmath1 values for some given altitude @xmath9 is needed to be renewed every 5 years with new igrf epoch coming .
values @xmath4 were obtained by trajectory computations using dynamic paraboloid model with parameter set @xmath15 $ ] ( sequence of variables is according to table [ t1 ] below ) . to compute @xmath13 database which is intended to provide dependence of @xmath16 on parameters and local time @xmath17 , we used the varying of all model parameters in wide enough ranges , comprising extreme , quiet and `` anti - extreme '' parameter sets .
the multidimensional grid , applied for this calculation , is presented in table [ t1 ] .
.the applied parameter grid . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^ " , ] values at the edges of this grid were obtained ( approximately ) from @xcite .
all calculations were performed for local time values @xmath18 and @xmath19 hours .
technical details of calculations are summarized in appendix .
let us now demonstrate some results of cutoff rigidity dependence on local time and model parameters , that have been computed using presented technique .
fig.[f1 ] gives an opportunity to weigh deposit of every model parameter in resulting @xmath0 value for all points of noted above set .
such case of partial dependencies is obtained by fixating all parameters as quiet and excepting the given one .
note , that the role of @xmath20 as @xmath0 depression factor wanes with decreasing of @xmath0 , but the @xmath21 one rises rapidly .
the weight of @xmath22 and @xmath23 seems to be not important for @xmath0 values , at any hand , in presented case of quiet basic values , because they result in @xmath0 changes that are comparable with the value of applied rigidity step size ( see appendix ) .
contrary , decrease of @xmath24 effects in huge @xmath0 grow ( see also fig.[f2 ] ) .
the effect of @xmath25 and @xmath26 here is clear but of moderate magnitude .
fig.[f2 ] shows family of @xmath0 daily variations for three points having normal cutoff values of different order . for the first picture
there are some hours where @xmath0 is negligibly small , so such a point can be accessible for particles of any rigidity .
the middle picture demonstrates the effect of @xmath24 `` anti - extreme '' setting , leading not only to very high @xmath0 mean values ( for this case ) , but also to the translocation of curve s maximum for time axis s positive direction .
the upper curve on the most right part of fig.[f2 ] exhibits the insufficiency of applied step size for penumbra calculation ( see appendix ) , leading to the underestimation of @xmath0 value for @xmath27 , which causes an ambiguous interpolation results .
however , this effect is rare and too weak to affect resulting transmission , for which calculating presented method was created .
a `` gnarlyness '' of some presented curves is due to effect of scarce grid , currently imperfect interpolation procedure and scale .
it is does not sufficiently affect the results of applications where much of @xmath0 values to be calculated , because interpolation uses many @xmath13 values and their errors ( which are of order of @xmath7 step size ) are to be evened .
extrapolating parameter values to out of grid ( but not very far ) is also possible and seems to be correct enough to get reliable result .
magnetospheric transmission functions are directly connected with such tasks as leo radiation conditions evaluating and the interpretation of orbital experiment results @xcite .
because of their importance , it is necessary to be able to account for more empiric factors that affecting transmission . here
we ll give some examples of calculated magnetospheric transmission functions for several ( quiet , disturbed and very extreme ) model parameters sets for iss - like orbit , obtained using presented technique . the essential note
is that , unlike tsyganenko models , the paraboloid one is primordially intended to describe even very extreme conditions , as it is not internally limited by experimental data arrays .
fig.[f3 ] presents some modeled transmissions for @xmath28 km @xmath29 circular orbit under different conditions for long mission duration , where all localities are averaged and transmission curve became smoothed . in comparison with additionally figured transmission , obtained by tsyganenko-89 ( t89 ) model with @xmath30 , it is obviously seen that the paraboloid model gives unapproachable for t89 results in modeling most extreme conditions .
the method we have developing is intended for applications using intensive geomagnetic cutoff calculations , first of all for express magnetospheric transmission calculation for given leo missions , even under changing magnetospheric conditions during flight .
test @xmath0 and transmission calculation , based on the presented technique , is available online by url http://dec1.sinp.msu.ru/vovka/riho ( a simplified version , where transmission calculation is allowed for only static conditions and circular orbits ) .
current version of the method uses the igrf rigidity values table as basic ( in step 1 of scheme ) , although it seems that the best choice would be to apply some other world basic grid , for example , one directly calculated @xmath4 table with using paraboloid model .
nevertheless , it does not understate the attenuation quotient methodology itself , because its drawback in our case is only correspond to relatively small systematic inaccuracies between conditional `` quiet '' @xmath13 values and igrf ones .
author thanks dr.nymmik for fruitful discussions on the topic of paper , and dr.kalegaev for the provided data and cluster computing facilities .
here we summarize technical moments that are related to the performed @xmath13 trajectory calculations with using paraboloid model .
vertically directed protons were test particles for reverse trajectory calculations of penumbra .
fourth order integration scheme was used for it , with accounting for time changing ( hence , magnetic field ) during particle s modeled flight .
the geomagnetic field there was superposition of igrf epoch 2005 field with dynamic paraboloid model ( version 2004 @xcite ) , with uniform field vector @xmath31 outside of the magnetopause , which position is natively given by the code realizing the paraboloid model .
maximal flying distance was equal to @xmath32 , the particles walked it over during motion were considered as allowed for penetration .
the earth was represented by wgs-82 ellipsoid with atmosphere layer at @xmath33 km above its surface , the particles which fell below it was considered as reentrant . rigidity step size for penumbra calculation was equal to @xmath34 gv . all calculations were performed for altitude @xmath35 km above mean earth s radii @xmath36 km for six selected points in northern geographic hemisphere with basic igrf rigidities @xmath37 gv . shea m.a . , smart d.f . and k.g.mccraken .
jgr , 70:4117 , 1965 stone e.c .
jgr , 69(17):3577 , 1964 smart d.f . , shea m.a . and r.gull .
jgr , 74(19):4731 , 1969 danilova o.a . and tyasto m.i
24th icrc , 5:1066 - 1069 , 1995 t.a .
ivanova et al .
, 25(1):7 - 12 , 1985 e.o .
flckiger et al .
jgr , 91(a7):7925 - 7930 , 1986 smart d.f .
magnetospheric models and trajectory computations .
space sci .
, 93:305 - 333 , 2000 smart d.f .
asr , 37:1206 - 1217 , 2006 smart d.f .
et al . proc .
26th icrc , 7 ( sh 3.6.28 ) , 1999a smart d.f . et al .
26th icrc , 7 ( sh 3.6.29 ) , 1999b smart d.f . and shea m.a
25th icrc , 2:397 - 400 , 1997 nymmik r.a . ,
diurnal variations of geomagnetic cutoff boundaries and the penetration function .
cosmic research , 29(3):491 - 493 , 1991 r.a .
nymmik et al .
30th icrc , 1:701 - 704 , 2007 n.a .
planet space sci .
37(1):5 - 20 , 1989 a.j .
tylka et al , creme96 : a revision of the cosmic ray effects on micro - electronics code .
ieee transactions on nuclear science , 44 , 2150 - 2160 ( 1997 ) ; and references therein .
alexeev et al .
magnetic storms and magnetotail currents .
jgr , 101(4):7737 - 7748 , 1996 i.i .
alexeev et al .
the model description of magnetospheric magnetic field in the course of magnetic storm on january 9 - 12 , 1997 .
jgr , 106(a11):25683 - 25694 , 2001 i.i .
alexeev et al .
modelling of the electromagnetic field in the interplanetary space and in the earth s magnetosphere .
space sci .
, 107 , n1/2:7 - 26 , 2003 v.v .
paraboloid model input for two large events in 2003 - 2004 .
private communication , 2006 http://www.magnetosphere.ru/iso r.a .
. doctoral dissertation .
sinp msu , moscow , 1998
|
radiation condition onboard leo spacecrafts determined by charged particles penetrating magnetosphere measure near - earth is local geomagnetic cutoff rigidity value cutoff rigidity denotes vertical cutoff rigidity ( @xmath0 ) gained from calculated discrete penumbra structure using white spectra magnitude of @xmath0 penetration boundaries depend on local time magnetospheric condition parameters cutoff rigidity variations measured in experiments or computation using earth s magnetosphere model usual method for @xmath0 calculation based on trajectory computation technique @xcite offer method to calculate @xmath0 for local time empirical parameters magnetospheric condition in near - earth space for method provides speedup needed igrf rigidity point rigidity attenuation @xcite quotient s dependence on empirical parameters first obtained using interpolation in @xmath1 tabulated data second particle trajectory computations in numerical magnetospheric model dynamic paraboloid model @xcite of earth s magnetosphere chosen for solution adopted cutoff rigidity attenuation formalism @xcite applied for transmission calculations using tsyganenko-89 @xcite modelrigidity attenuation quotient @xmath2 calculated as @xmath3 @xmath4 corresponds model parameters non - disturbed magnetosphere @xmath5 varied parameters quiet ones @xmath2 dependence on point s geographical position small true for @xmath6 gv accuracy error percents lowest @xmath7 calculating world - wide @xmath0 grid simplified algorithm obtaining @xmath8 3 stages calculating @xmath1 for point interpolation in pre - calculated grid altitude @xmath9 formula @xmath10 transform @xmath1 to new altitude @xmath11 calculating model - dependent cutoff rigidity attenuation quotient + @xmath12 by interpolation in pre - calculated @xmath13 database extrapolation if @xmath1 computing resulting value @xmath14 table of @xmath1 values for altitude @xmath9 renewed every 5 years new igrf epoch values @xmath4 obtained by trajectory computations dynamic paraboloid model with parameter set @xmath15 sequence of variables table t1compute @xmath13 database dependence @xmath16 on parameters local time @xmath17 used varying model parameters ranges extreme quiet anti - extreme parameter sets multidimensional grid presented in table t1 values edges obtained from @xcite calculations performed for local time values @xmath18 @xmath19 hours details summarized in appendix demonstrate results cutoff rigidity dependence on local time model parameters computed technique fig.[f1 ] opportunity weigh deposit every model parameter resulting @xmath0 value points partial dependencies obtained fixating all parameters as quiet excepting one role @xmath20 as @xmath0 depression factor wanes with decreasing @xmath0 @xmath21 rises rapidly weight of @xmath22 @xmath23 not important for @xmath0 values quiet values result in @xmath0 changes comparable with applied rigidity step size decrease @xmath24 effects @xmath0 grow effect of @xmath25 @xmath26 moderate magnitude fig.[f2 ] shows @xmath0 daily variations for three points normal cutoff values different hours @xmath0 negligibly small accessible for rigiditymiddle picture @xmath24 anti - extreme setting high @xmath0 mean values translocation of curve s maximum time axis s positive direction upper curve fig.[f2 insufficiency step size for penumbra calculation underestimation @xmath0 value for @xmath27 ambiguous interpolation results effect rare weak to affect transmission method created gnarlyness curves due to scarce grid imperfect interpolation procedure scale not affect results applications @xmath0 values interpolation uses many @xmath13 values errors @xmath7 step size evened extrapolating parameter values out of grid possible reliable result magnetospheric transmission functions connected with leo radiation conditions interpretation orbital experiment results necessary to account for empiric factors affecting transmission examples of calculated magnetospheric transmission functions for quiet disturbed extreme model parameters sets for iss - like orbit using presented technique unlike tsyganenko models paraboloid one intended describe extreme conditions not limited by experimental data arrays fig.[f3 ] presents modeled transmissions for @xmath28 @xmath29 circular orbit under different conditions long mission duration localities averaged transmission curve smoothedcomparison with transmission tsyganenko-89 model with @xmath30 paraboloid model gives t89 results extreme conditions method developing for intensive geomagnetic cutoff calculations express magnetospheric transmission calculation for leo missions under changing magnetospheric conditions during flight test @xmath0 transmission calculation available online http://dec1.sinp.msu.ru/vovka/riho simplified version for conditions circular orbits current method uses igrf rigidity values table basic apply other world basic grid calculated @xmath4 table paraboloid model understate attenuation quotient methodology drawback small systematic inaccuracies between quiet @xmath13 values and igrf ones author thanks dr.nymmik dr.kalegaev for data cluster computing facilities summarize technical moments to @xmath13 trajectory calculations paraboloid model vertically directed protons test particles for reverse trajectory calculations of penumbra fourth order integration scheme used accounting for time changing magnetic field during flight superposition of igrf epoch 2005 field with dynamic paraboloid model 2004 uniform field vector @xmath31 outside magnetopause by code paraboloid modelflying distance equal @xmath32 particles penetration earth represented by wgs-82 ellipsoid atmosphere layer @xmath33 km above surface particles below reentrant rigidity step size penumbra equal @xmath34 gv calculations altitude @xmath35 km above earth s radii @xmath36 km six points northern hemisphere igrf rigidities @xmath37 gv shea m smart d.f . k.g.mccraken 70:4117 1965 stone 69(17):3577 1964 smart r.gull 74(19):4731 1969 danilova tyasto 24th icrc 5:1066 - 1069 1995 ivanova et 25(1):7 - 12 1985 flckiger 91(a7):7925 - 7930 1986 smart d.f . magnetospheric models trajectory computations space sci . 93:305 - 333 2000 37:1206 - 1217 2006 26th icrc 3.6.28 25th icrc 2:397 - 400 1997 nymmik geomagnetic cutoff boundaries penetration function cosmic research 29(3):491 - 493 199130th icrc 1:701 - 704 2007 planet space sci 37(1):5 - 20 1989 tylka cosmic ray effects micro - electronics code nuclear science 44 2150 - 2160 1997 alexeev magnetic storms magnetotail currents 101(4):7737 - 7748 1996 magnetospheric field storm january 9 - 12 1997 jgr 106(a11):25683 - 25694 2001 modelling electromagnetic field interplanetary space earth magnetosphere space sci 107:7 - 26 2003 paraboloid model large events 2003 2004 private communication 2006 doctoral dissertation msu moscow 1998
| 0.438574
| 2,862
| 1,491
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,581
|
with the smearing technique , the three - quark ( 3q ) ground - state potential @xmath0 is numerically extracted in the su(3)@xmath1 lattice qcd monte carlo simulation with @xmath2 and @xmath3 at the quenched level . with accuracy better than a few %
, @xmath0 is well described by a sum of a constant @xmath4 , the two - body coulomb part @xmath5 and the three - body linear confinement part @xmath6 , where @xmath7 denotes the minimal length of the color flux tube linking the three quarks . by comparing with the q-@xmath8 potential , we find a universal feature of the string tension as @xmath9 and the one - gluon - exchange result for the coulomb coefficient as @xmath10 .
all our results including the constant term are consistent with the requirement on the diquark limit in the lattice regularization .
|
similar to the relevant role of the q-@xmath8 potential for meson properties , the three - quark ( 3q ) potential @xcite is directly responsible to the structure and properties of baryons . in spite of the importance of the 3q potential in the hadron physics
, there were only a few preliminary lattice - qcd studies for the 3q potential done in 80 s @xcite .
the 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 can be measured in a gauge - invariant manner using the 3q wilson loop @xmath11 as shown in fig.1 , @xmath12 similar to the derivation of the q-@xmath13 potential from the wilson loop . in principle , @xmath0 can be obtained in the large @xmath14 limit , however , the practical lattice - qcd calculation of @xmath15 becomes severe for large @xmath14 , because @xmath15 decreases exponentially with @xmath14 .
physically , the true ground state of the 3q system is expected to consist of three flux tubes , and the 3q state expressed by the three strings generally includes many excited - state components such as flux - tube vibrational modes .
therefore , for the accurate measurement of the 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 , the ground - state enhancement or the excitation - component reduction by the smearing technique @xcite is practically indispensable .
( this smearing was not applied in refs .
@xcite . ) in this paper , we study the 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 using the ground - state enhancement by the gauge - covariant smearing technique for the link - variable in the su(3)@xmath1 lattice qcd with the standard action with @xmath16=5.7 ( @xmath17 0.19fm ) and @xmath18 24 at the quenched level @xcite .
we consider 16 patterns of the 3q configuration where the three quarks are put on @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 in @xmath22 with @xmath23 in the lattice unit .
the junction point @xmath24 , which does not affect @xmath0 , is set at the origin @xmath25 in @xmath22 .
the smearing technique is actually successful for accurate measurements of the q-@xmath8 potential in the lattice qcd @xcite .
the standard smearing for link - variables is performed by the iterative replacement of the spatial link - variable @xmath26 ( @xmath27 ) by the obscured link - variable @xmath28 @xcite which maximizes @xmath29 \right\ } , \quad u_{-\mu}(s ) \equiv u_{\mu}^{\dagger}(s-\hat \mu ) , \ ] ] with a real smearing parameter @xmath30 .
the @xmath31-th smeared link - variable @xmath32 is defined as @xmath33 as an important feature , this smearing procedure keeps the gauge covariance of the smeared link - variable @xmath32 properly .
in fact , the gauge - transformation property of @xmath32 is just the same as that of the original link - variable @xmath34 , and therefore the gauge invariance of @xmath35 is ensured whenever @xmath36 is gauge invariant .
since the smeared link - variable @xmath32 includes a spatial extension , the `` line '' expressed with @xmath32 physically corresponds to a `` flux tube '' with a spatial extension .
therefore , if a suitable smearing is done , the `` line '' of the smeared link - variable is expected to be close to the ground - state flux tube . here , the overlap between the ground - state operator and the 3q - state operator at @xmath37 in the 3q wilson loop @xmath11 is estimated by @xmath38.\ ] ] to get the ground - state - dominant 3q system , we investigate the ground - state overlap @xmath39 for the 3q wilson loop composed of the smeared link - variable @xmath32 in the lattice qcd , and we adopt the smearing with @xmath40 and the iteration number @xmath41 , which largely enhances @xmath39 for all of the 3q configurations in consideration as shown in fig.2 .
in this section , we consider the potential form of @xmath0 based on qcd . in the short - distance limit , the perturbative qcd is applicable and the coulomb - type potential appears as the one - gluon - exchange ( oge ) result . in the long - distance limit at the quenched level , the flux - tube picture would be applicable from the argument of the strong - coupling qcd @xcite , and hence a linear - type confinement potential is expected to appear .
actually , the q-@xmath42 potential @xmath43 is well reproduced by the coulomb - plus - linear potential in the lattice qcd .
then , we conjecture that the 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 is also expressed by a sum of the short - distance oge result and the long - distance flux - tube result as @xmath44 where @xmath7 denotes the minimal length of the total flux tubes linking the three quarks .
next , we consider the diquark limit , where the 3q system becomes equivalent to a q-@xmath42 system , which leads to a physical requirement on the relation between @xmath0 and @xmath43 . here , the constant term is to be considered carefully , because there appears a divergence from the coulomb term in @xmath0 as @xmath45 in the continuum diquark limit . in the lattice regularization ,
this ultraviolet divergence is regularized to be a finite constant with the lattice spacing @xmath46 as @xmath47 , where @xmath48 is a dimensionless constant satisfying @xmath49 and @xmath50 .
thus , we get the diquark - limit requirement on the lattice , @xmath51
we measure the 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 from 210 gauge configurations in the su(3)@xmath1 lattice qcd using the smearing technique , and compare the lattice data with the theoretical form of eq.(5 ) .
table 1 shows the best fit coefficients in @xmath0 and @xmath43 in eq.(5 ) .
table 2 shows the comparison between the lattice qcd data @xmath52 and the fitting function @xmath53 in eq.(5 ) with the three coefficients listed in table 1 .
as shown in table 2 , the three - quark ground - state potential @xmath0 is well described by eq.(5 ) with accuracy better than a few % . from table 1 , we find a universal feature of the string tension , @xmath54 , as well as the oge result for the coulomb coefficient , @xmath55 .
all the diquark - limit requirements in eq.(6 ) are satisfied for @xmath56 .
another fitting with the @xmath57-type flux - tube ansatz @xcite seems rather worse , because of unacceptably large @xmath58 .
however , as an approximation , @xmath0 seems described by a simple sum of an effective two - body q - q potential with a reduced string tension as @xmath59 .
this reduction factor can be naturally understood as a geometrical factor rather than the color factor , since the ratio between @xmath7 and the perimeter length @xmath60 satisfies @xmath61 , which leads to @xmath62 with @xmath63 . .
the string tension , the coulomb coefficient and the constant term for the 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 and the q-@xmath8 potential @xmath64 in the lattice unit with @xmath65 0.19fm . [ cols= " < ,
< , < , < " , ] 9 t.t .
takahashi , h. matsufuru , y. nemoto and h. suganuma , proc . of the tmu - yale symp . on `` dynamics of gauge fields '' ,
tmu , tokyo , dec . 1999 ,
a. chodos et al .
( eds . ) , universal academy press , tokyo ( 2000 ) in press .
s. capstick and n. isgur , phys . rev .
* d34 * ( 1986 ) 2809 .
n. brambilla , g.m .
prosperi and a. vairo , phys . lett .
* b362 * ( 1995 ) 113 .
r. sommer and j. wosiek , phys.lett.*149b * ( 1984 ) 497 ; nucl.phys.*b267 * ( 1986 ) 531 .
thacker , e. eichten and j.c .
sexton , nucl .
* b * ( proc . suppl . ) * 4 * ( 1988 ) 234 .
ape collaboration , m. albanese et al .
, phys . lett .
* b192 * ( 1987 ) 163 .
bali , c. schlichter and k. schilling , phys . rev .
* d51 * ( 1995 ) 5165 .
j. kogut and l. susskind , phys . rev .
* d11 * ( 1975 ) 395 .
|
q-@xmath8 potential meson properties three - quark 3q potential @xcite structure properties baryons hadron physics few preliminary lattice - qcd studies in 80 s @xcite 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 measured gauge - invariant 3q wilson loop @xmath11.1 @xmath12 q-@xmath13 potential @xmath0 large @xmath14 limit lattice - qcd calculation @xmath15 severe for @xmath14 decreases @xmath14 ground state 3q system three flux tubes state includes excited - state components accurate measurement 3q ground state - state enhancement excitation - component reduction by smearing @xcite indispensable not applied in @xcite study 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 using enhancement gauge - covariant smearing technique link - variable su(3)@xmath1 lattice qcd standard action @xmath16=5.7 ( @xmath17 0.19fm ) @xmath18 24 at quenched level @xcite 16 patterns 3q configuration three quarks on @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 in @xmath22 @xmath23 in lattice unitjunction point @xmath24 affect @xmath0 set at origin @xmath25 in @xmath22 smearing technique successful for accurate measurements q-@xmath8 potential in lattice qcd @xcite standard smearing for spatial link variable @xmath26 by obscured @xmath28 maximizes @xmath29 with real smearing parameter @xmath30 @xmath31-th smeared link - variable @xmath32 defined as @xmath33 smearing keeps gauge covariance gauge - transformation property @xmath32 same as original link @xmath34 gauge invariance of @xmath35 ensured @xmath36 invariant smeared link - variable @xmath32 includes spatial extension line corresponds to flux tube with spatial extension suitable smearing line close to ground - state flux tube overlap between ground - state operator 3q - state operator at @xmath37 in 3q wilson loop @xmath11 estimated by @xmath38.ground - state - dominant 3q system investigate overlap @xmath39 3q wilson loop smeared link - variable @xmath32 lattice adopt smearing @xmath40 iteration number @xmath41 enhances @xmath39 3q configurations fig.2 consider potential form @xmath0 qcd short - distance limit perturbative qcd coulomb - type potential one - gluon - exchange result long - distance limit flux - tube picture strong - coupling qcd linear - type confinement potential q-@xmath42 potential @xmath43 reproduced coulomb - plus - linear potential lattice qcd conjecture 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 expressed sum short - distance oge result long - distance flux - tube result @xmath44 @xmath7 minimal length flux tubes three quarks consider diquark limit 3q system equivalent q-@xmath42 system physical requirement relation @xmath0 @xmath43 constant term divergence coulomb term @xmath0 @xmath45 continuum diquark limit divergence finite constant lattice spacing @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 dimensionless constant @xmath49 @xmath50diquark - limit requirement lattice @xmath51 measure 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 210 gauge configurations@xmath1 lattice qcd compare lattice data theoretical form eq.(5 ) table 1 best fit coefficients @xmath0 @xmath43 eq.(5 table 2 comparison lattice qcd data @xmath52 fitting function @xmath53.(5 ) three coefficients three - quark ground - state potential @xmath0 described eq.(5 ) accuracy universal feature string tension @xmath54 oge result coulomb coefficient @xmath55 diquark - limit requirements satisfied @xmath56 fitting @xmath57-type flux - tube ansatz worse large @xmath58 @xmath0 sum two - body q potential reduced string tension @xmath59 reduction factor geometrical factor ratio @xmath7 perimeter length @xmath60 satisfies @xmath61 leads @xmath62 @xmath63 string tension coulomb coefficient constant term 3q ground - state potential @xmath0 q-@xmath8 potential @xmath64 lattice unit @xmath65 0.19fm takahashi matsufuru y nemoto.suganuma tmu - yale symp dynamics gauge fields tokyo dec. 1999 chodos eds universal academy press tokyo 2000 capstick n isgur . rev. d34 1986 ) 2809 brambilla prosperi vairo . lett b362 1995 ) 113 sommer j wosiek.lett.*149b 1984 ) 497 nucl.phys*b267 1986 531 thacker eichten j sexton nucl 1988 ) 234 ape collaboration albanese phys . lett b192 1987 ) 163 bali. schlichter k schilling phys . rev d51 1995 ) 5165 j. kogut l. susskind . rev d11 1975 ) 395
| 0.319042
| 2,057
| 1,119
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,583
|
i present recent calculations of the hadronic contributions to muon anomalous magnetic moment in holographic qcd , based on gauge / gravity duality .
the holographic estimates are compared well with the analysis based on recently revised babar measurements of @xmath0 cross - sections and also with other model calculations for the light - by - light scattering contributions .
|
the successful prediction of anomalous magnetic moments in early days of particle physics was one of the first triumphs of quantum field theory @xcite . since then it has served as a critical test of the standard model of particle physics , which is based on quantum field theory , guided by gauge principle .
recent measurement of anomalous magnetic moment of muon ( e821 at bnl ) @xcite provides the most stringent test so far , at the level of sub parts per million , of the standard model , @xmath1 which exhibits currently @xmath2 deviation from the standard model estimate : @xmath3 if the discrepancy persists in more improved measurements , such as the e969 experiment , planned at bnl , or other experiments at the fermi lab , it will certainly indicate a hint of new physics .
therefore it is quite necessary to understand the standard model predictions more precisely to pin down the possible hint of new physics at the level of @xmath4 or more .
the theoretical prediction of muon @xmath5 in the standard model consists of three different contributions : @xmath6 among them the qed contribution is most dominant one and has been calculated to be @xmath7 at 4.5 loops by kinoshita et al @xcite , while the weak interaction corrections are found to be @xmath8 at the two - loop level @xcite . as hadrons ( or quarks ) contribute to the anomalous magnetic moment of muon only through quantum fluctuations , the strong interaction contribution is suppressed , compared to that of qed .
the current estimate of the hadronic contributions is @xmath9 the most uncertainty in the sm estimate is however coming from the hadronic contributions , since we poorly understand strong dynamics , while the electroweak corrections can be calculated accurately in perturbation
. direct calculation of hadronic contributions from qcd requires lattice calculations , which are currently not accurate enough to give a meaningful result due to large systematic uncertainties @xcite . in this talk
i present new estimates of the hadronic contributions , based on a holographic model of qcd .
holographic models have been proposed recently for qcd @xcite , inspired by the gauge / gravity duality , found in string theory @xcite , which states that certain strongly coupled gauge theories are equivalent to weakly coupled gravity in one - higher dimension , the extra dimension being the renormalization scale .
the holographic models of qcd were found to be quite successful to account for the properties of hadrons at low energy and give relations to their couplings and also new sum rules @xcite , offering theoretical understanding of phenomenological rules for hadrons found in 60 s such as vector meson dominance , proposed by sakurai @xcite .
holographic qcd ( hqcd ) is a model for 5d gravity dual theory of qcd in the large @xmath10 and large t hooft coupling limit ( @xmath11 ) , describing qcd directly with hadrons . as a gravity dual of qcd with three light flavors we consider @xmath12 flavor gauge theory in a slice of @xmath13 , @xmath14 where the metric is given as
, taking the ads radius @xmath15 , @xmath16 we take the ultraviolet ( uv ) regulator @xmath17 and introduce an infra - red ( ir ) brane at @xmath18 to implement the confinement of qcd , breaking the conformal symmetry @xcite . the bulk scalar ( @xmath19 ) and the bulk gauge fields ( @xmath20 ) are dual to @xmath21 and @xmath22 , respectively . following katz and schwartz @xcite ,
we have introduced a flavor - singlet bulk scalar ( @xmath23 ) for the @xmath24 meson , which is dual to @xmath25 ( @xmath26 ) and is described by @xmath27\label{5}\,.\ ] ] finally we introduce a chern - simons term to reproduce the qcd flavor anomaly @xcite , @xmath28\,,\label{cs}\ ] ] where @xmath29 .
our calculations can be easily applied to other holographic models like sakai - sugimoto model , which will give similar results
. gauge / gravity duality at large @xmath10 and large @xmath30 implies that the generating functional of one - particle irreducible green s functions is given by the classical gravity action of the dual theory : @xmath31=s_{5d{\rm eff}}[\phi(x,\epsilon)]\quad{\rm with}\quad \phi(x,\epsilon)=\phi_{0}(x)\,.\label{ads - cft}\ ] ] using this equality we will be able to calculate the hadronic contributions at the leading order in @xmath32 and @xmath33 expansion .
the strong interaction contributions to the muon magnetic moment consist of three pieces ; the hadronic vacuum polarization ( hlo ) , the higher - order hadronic vacuum - polarization effect , and the hadronic light - by - light ( lbl ) scattering .
the hlo contribution ( see fig . [ hlo ] ) is given as @xcite @xmath34 where the vacuum polarization is defined as @xmath35 and the kernel is @xmath36 from the ads / cft formula ( [ ads - cft ] ) the vector current correlator @xmath37 can then be expressed in terms of the infinite set of the vector meson wave - functions @xmath38 , as shown in fig .
[ vmd ] , which is the holographic realization of the vector meson dominance proposed by sakurai , @xmath39 ^ 2}{(q^2 - m_{v_n}^2 ) m_{v_n}^2 } \ , , \label{piv : res}\ ] ] where the dot denotes the derivative with respect to @xmath40 , @xmath41 . using the holographic renormalization to take care of the uv divergence and keeping only the first four low - lying states
, we find for euclidean momentum @xmath42
@xcite @xmath43 where @xmath44 is the decay constant of @xmath45-th excited vector mesons .
plugging the holographic vacuum polarization ( [ bar : pi ] ) into the formula ( [ g-2 ] ) , we obtain @xcite @xmath46 which agrees , within 30% errors , with the currently updated value @xcite , estimated from new 2009 babar data @xcite @xmath47 |_{\rm babar } = ( 514.1 \pm 3.8 ) \times 10^{-10 } \ , .
\label{babar}\ ] ] for the hadronic light - by - light corrections , shown in fig .
[ lbl diagram ] , we need to calculate 4-point functions of flavor currents .
since there is no quartic term for @xmath48 ( @xmath49 ) , there is no 1pi 4-point function for the em currents in hqcd , because higher order terms like @xmath50 or @xmath51 terms are suppressed . in hqcd
the lbl diagram is therefore dominated by vva or vvp diagrams ( see fig .
[ lbl diagram1 ] ) , which come from the chern - simons term , eq . [ cs ] : @xmath52 where the gauge fields satisfy in the axial gauge , @xmath53 , @xmath54_{\perp}&=&0\,,\label{1}\\ \left[\partial_z\left(\frac{1}{z}\partial_za_\mu^{\hat a}\right)+\frac{q^2}{z}a_\mu^{\hat a}-\frac{g_5 ^ 2v^2}{z^3}a_\mu^{\hat a}\right]_{\perp}&=&0\,,\label{2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath55 denotes the projection onto the transversal components . for two flavors
the longitudinal components , @xmath56 , and the phase of bulk scalar @xmath19 are related by eom as @xmath57 the anomalous form factor is then given as @xcite , with @xmath58 and @xmath59 @xmath60,\label{pionff}\ ] ] where we take as boundary conditions @xmath61 and @xmath62 .
-0.2 in for lower part ; @xmath63 for upper part ( brodsky - lepage).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=55.0% ] to calculate the hadronic lbl contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment we expand the photon line in the anomalous form factor ( [ pionff ] ) as @xmath64 the result is shown in table [ result ] for several choices of vector - mode truncations @xcite .
[ result ] our results are comparable with recent results by a. nyffeler @xcite , obtained in the lmd+v model ; @xmath65
in the era of electroweak precision , it becomes more important to understand precisely qcd corrections to the electroweak processes . as being non - perturbative strong dynamics , qcd corrections are often difficult to estimate and one resorts to lattice calculations , which are , however , not precise enough for certain measurements such as muon anomalous magnetic moment .
recent development in gauge / gravity duality shows that in the large @xmath10 and large @xmath30 limit the estimate of qcd contributions can be made precisely in holographic qcd , thus may be useful in assessing the new physics effects .
i present recent estimates @xcite of anomalous magnetic moment of muon in holographic qcd , which are found to be in consistent with other calculations .
d.k.h . is grateful to the organizers of scgt09 for a very stimulating meeting and thanks doyoun kim and shinya matsuzaki for the collaborations upon which this talk is based on .
this work is supported by the korea research foundation grant funded by the korean government ( moehrd , basic research promotion fund ) ( krf-2007 - 314- c00052 ) .
99 j. s. schwinger , phys .
82 * , 664 ( 1951 ) .
g. w. bennett _ et al . _ [ muon g-2 collaboration ] , phys .
d * 73 * , 072003 ( 2006 ) . for recent five - loop calculations , see t. aoyama , m. hayakawa , t. kinoshita and m. nio , phys .
d * 78 * , 113006 ( 2008 ) .
a. czarnecki , b. krause and w. j. marciano , phys .
lett . * 76 * , 3267 ( 1996 ) .
t. blum , phys . rev
. lett . * 91 * , 052001 ( 2003 ) .
t. sakai and s. sugimoto , prog .
phys . * 113 * , 843 ( 2005 ) .
j. erlich , e. katz , d. t. son and m. a. stephanov , phys .
rev . lett . * 95 * , 261602 ( 2005 ) ; l. da rold and a. pomarol , nucl .
b * 721 * , 79 ( 2005 ) .
j. m. maldacena , adv .
theor . math .
* 2 * , 231 ( 1998 ) [ int .
j. theor .
phys . * 38 * , 1113 ( 1999 ) ] ; s. s. gubser , i. r. klebanov and a. m. polyakov , phys .
b * 428 * , 105 ( 1998 ) ; e. witten , adv .
* 2 * , 253 ( 1998 ) .
d. k. hong , t. inami and h. u. yee , phys .
b * 646 * , 165 ( 2007 ) .
d. k. hong , m. rho , h. u. yee and p.
yi , phys .
d * 76 * , 061901 ( 2007 ) ; jhep * 0709 * , 063 ( 2007 ) ; phys . rev .
d * 77 * , 014030 ( 2008 ) .
j. j. sakurai , phys .
* 22 * , 981 ( 1969 ) .
b. aubert _ et al . _ [ babar collaboration ] , phys .
lett . * 103 * , 231801 ( 2009 ) .
h. r. grigoryan and a. v. radyushkin , phys .
d * 77 * , 115024 ( 2008 ) .
d. k. hong and d. kim , phys .
b * 680 * , 480 ( 2009 ) .
a. nyffeler , phys .
d * 79 * , 073012 ( 2009 ) .
|
prediction of anomalous magnetic moments early particle physics first quantum field theory critical test of standard model particle physics based quantum field theory guided gauge principle recent measurement anomalous magnetic moment muon ( e821 at bnl ) stringent test sub parts per million standard model exhibits @xmath2 deviation from standard model estimate if discrepancy persists in improved measurements hint new physics necessary to understand standard model predictions to possible hint new physics @xmath4 or more theoretical prediction of muon @xmath5 model consists three contributions qed contribution dominant calculated @xmath7 at 4.5 loops by kinoshita weak interaction corrections @xmath8 at two - loop level hadrons contribute to anomalous magnetic moment muon through quantum fluctuations strong interaction contribution suppressed current estimate of hadronic contributions is @xmath9 most uncertainty from hadronic contributions poorly understand strong dynamics electroweak corrections calculated accurately in perturbation direct calculation of hadronic contributions from qcd requires lattice calculations not accurate large systematic uncertaintiestalk present new estimates hadronic contributions based holographic model qcd holographic models proposed for qcd @xcite inspired by gauge / gravity duality string theory strongly coupled gauge theories equivalent to weakly coupled gravity higher dimension dimension renormalization scale holographic models qcd account properties hadrons low energy relations couplings new sum rules @xcite understanding phenomenological rules hadrons vector meson dominance proposed sakurai holographic qcd model 5d gravity dual theory qcd large @xmath10 t hooft coupling limit describing qcd with hadrons gravity dual qcd three light flavors consider @xmath12 flavor gauge theory @xmath13 metric radius ultraviolet regulator introduce infra - red brane at @xmath18 confinement qcd breaking conformal symmetry bulk scalar bulk gauge fields dual to @xmath21 @xmath22 introduced flavor - singlet bulk scalar @xmath23 ) for @xmath24 meson dual to @xmath25 described by @xmath27introduce chern - simons term qcd flavor anomaly @xcite @xmath28 @xmath29 calculations holographic models sakai - sugimoto model similar results gauge / gravity duality @xmath10 @xmath30 implies generating functional one - particle irreducible green s functions classical gravity action dual theory @xmath31{5d\rm\phi(x,\epsilon)(x\epsilon{0}(x) - cft equality calculate hadronic contributions leading order @xmath32 @xmath33 expansion strong interaction contributions muon magnetic moment hadronic vacuum polarization higher - order hadronic vacuum - polarization effect hadronic light - by - scattering hlo contribution @xcite @xmath34 vacuum polarization defined @xmath35 kernel @xmath36 vector current correlator @xmath37 expressed infinite set vector meson wave - functions @xmath38 fig .vmd holographic realization vector meson dominance by sakurai @xmath39(q^2 -{v_n}^2 dot derivative @xmath40 @xmath41 holographic renormalization uv divergence first four low - lying states euclidean momentum @xmath42 @xcite @xmath43 @xmath44 decay constant of @xmath45-th vector mesons holographic vacuum polarization pi formula g-2 @xcite @xmath46 agrees with updated value @xcite 2009 babar data @xmath47 babar = ( 514.1 \pm 3.8 ) 10^{-10 } hadronic light - by - light corrections lbl diagram calculate 4-point functions of flavor currents no quartic term for @xmath48 @xmath49 no 1pi 4-point function em currents in hqcd higher @xmath50 @xmath51 suppressed lbl diagram dominated by vva or vvp diagrams fig lbl diagram1 chern - simons term@xmath52 gauge fields satisfy axial gauge @xmath53 @xmath54}{1\left\partial_z{1}_za^{\right\frac{q^2}{z}a{g_5 2v^2}{z^3}a}&0{2}{aligned @xmath55 projection transversal components longitudinal components @xmath56 phase bulk scalar @xmath19 related eom @xmath57 anomalous form factor @xcite @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60} conditions @xmath61 @xmath62 -0.2 lower part @xmath63 upper part -:",scaledwidth=55.0% calculate hadronic lbl contribution muon anomalous magnetic moment expand photon line anomalous form factor @xmath64 result shown table vector - mode truncations @xcite results comparable recent results a. nyffeler @xcite lmd+v model @xmath65 era electroweak precision important understand qcd corrections electroweak processesnon - perturbative dynamics qcd corrections difficult estimate lattice calculations not precise measurements muon anomalous magnetic moment development gauge gravity duality large @xmath10 @xmath30 limit estimate qcd contributions holographic qcd useful assessing new physics effects estimates anomalous magnetic moment muon holographic qcd consistent with calculations grateful organizers scgt09 meeting thanks doyoun kim shinya matsuzaki collaborations work supported korea research foundation grant korean government research promotion fund - 314- c00052 schwinger phys . 82 * 664 ( 1951 ) bennett muon g-2 collaboration . 73 * 072003 ( 2006 ) recent five - loop calculations t. aoyama hayakawa kinoshita m. nio phys . 78 113006 ( 2008 ) czarnecki b. krause marciano phys . 76 3267 ( 1996 ) blum phys . 91 052001 ( 2003 ). sakai s sugimoto phys . 113 * 843 ( 2005 ) j. erlich katz son stephanov phys . rev95 261602 2005 ) l rold pomarol nucl 721 79 2005 ) maldacena adv math 2 231 ( 1998 ) theor 38 1113 ( 1999 ) gubser klebanov polyakov . 428 105 1998 ) witten adv. 2 253 ( 1998 ) d k. t inami h u. yee phys. 646 165 ( 2007 ) k. m rho h u. yee p yi phys 76 061901 ( 2007 ) 0709 063 ( 2007 phys 77 014030 ( 2008 ) j sakurai phys 22 981 ( 1969 ) b aubert collaboration phys . 103 231801 ( 2009 ) grigoryan v radyushkin phys 77 115024 ( 2008 ) d k. hong d. kim phys 680 480 ( 2009 ) a nyffeler phys . 79 073012 ( 2009 )
| 0.438203
| 2,916
| 1,457
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,585
|
we study the gauge symmetries in a mielke - baekler type model of gravity in 2 + 1 dimensions .
the model is built in a poincare gauge theory framework where localisation of poincare symmetries lead to gravity .
however , explicit construction of gauge symmetries in the model through a hamiltonian procedure yields an apparently different set of symmetries , as has been noted by various authors . here ,
we show that the two sets of symmetries are actually equivalent in a canonical sense , their difference being just a set of trivial symmetries .
|
gauge symmetries and their systematic construction , while being of great significance , is fraught with subtleties . they must be off - shell , i.e. the action should remain invariant under them without use of any equations of motion and there are systematic algorithms for construction of such off - shell symmetries @xcite . in models of gravity obtained by gauging poincare symmetries , it is however seen that such systematic approaches yield the poincare symmetries only on - shell .
so , at the off - shell level , it appears that there are two independent set of symmetries .
this is unsettling .
we would then be required to find additional independent first - class constraints to support these symmetries . however , physically the only independent symmetries present are the space - time translations and lorentz boosts , i.e. the poincare symmetries .
we set up the model in the poincare gauge theory ( pgt ) formalism @xcite .
the global poincare symmetries on a set of global coordinates @xmath0 are localised at every spacetime point by introducing local frames having coordinates @xmath1 .
both sets are 3-dimensional for our model , though the construction can be carried out in any dimensions .
to change physical variables from one set of coordinates to another , triad fields are introduced , which are defined through @xmath2 here ` @xmath3 ' and ` @xmath4 ' are the metrics of the global and local sets of coordinates , respectively and ` @xmath4 ' is the standard minkowskian metric with signature @xmath5 .
now , to keep the invariance of the theory , a gauge connection field ` @xmath6 ' is introduced through a newly defined gauge covariant derivative . for an arbitrary vector @xmath7 , the derivative is written as @xmath8 the corresponding field strengths give rise to gravitational fields @xmath9 b^i_{\ \rho } = \epsilon^i_{\ jk } r^j_{\ \mu\nu } b^k_{\ \rho}\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath10 defines the riemann .
similarly , the commutator of @xmath11 derivatives give rise to the torsion @xmath12 it must be emphasised that this is a setting in the riemann - cartan spacetime rather than the riemann spacetime of usual general relativity .
in general it contains torsion , which goes to zero only after imposition of the connection variable s equation of motion , giving back the torsion free riemannian manifold of general relativity .
the poincare symmetries of the basic fields are @xcite @xmath13 where @xmath14 parametrizes local lorentz rotations and @xmath15 local coordinate translations .
they together constitute the @xmath16 independent poincare symmetries in 3d .
these symmetries are independent of the particular action being considered , so long as they are constructed in a proper tensorial manner .
now , symmetries of an action can be constructed via a hamiltonian analysis through completely off - shell procedures , as stated before .
after this is carried out , we find the symmetries which keeps the action invariant , as expected . however they can not be identified with the poincare symmetries , even after an appropriate field - dependent redefinition of the symmetry parameters .
the clue of identification , as we show , lies in ` trivial ' gauge symmetries @xcite .
they are symmetries of the form @xmath17 which keep any action _ off - shell _ invariant due to antisymmetry in the coefficients @xmath18 .
thus @xmath19 without depending on the form of the euler derivatives @xmath20 and without requiring the imposition of the equations of motion @xmath21 in what follows , we take up the mielke - baekler model , summarise its hamiltonian constraints , outline construction of an off - shell gauge generator and generate gauge symmetries .
these are then compared with the poincare symmetries to see how the two may actually be equivalent .
the mielke - baekler 3d topological gravity model with torsion @xcite along with a cosmological term is described by @xmath22\end{aligned}\ ] ] whose equations of motion are found by setting the euler derivatives to zero @xmath23 = 0 \\ \frac{\delta s}{\delta \omega^i_{\ \mu } } & = \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho } \left [ \alpha_3\ , r_{i\nu\rho } + a\ , t_{i\nu\rho } + \alpha_4\ , \epsilon_{ijk}b^j_{\ \nu}b^k_{\ \rho } \right ] = 0 . \end{aligned}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the constraints in the above model are @xcite listed in table [ tab : constraints mb ] l c c & first class @xmath24 & second class @xmath25 + primary & @xmath26 & @xmath27 , @xmath28 + secondary & @xmath29 & + with the definitions @xmath30 - \nabla_{\!\alpha } \phi_i^{\ \alpha } + \epsilon_{ijk}\ , b^j_{\ \alpha } \left ( p\,\phi^{k\alpha } + q\ , \phi^{k\alpha } \right ) \\
\bar{\mathcal{k}}_i & = -\left [ \epsilon^{0\alpha\beta } \left ( a\,t_{i\alpha\beta } + \alpha_3\,r_{i\alpha\beta } + \alpha_4\,\epsilon_{ijk } b^j_{\ \alpha } b^k_{\ \beta } \right ) \right ] - \nabla_{\!\alpha } \phi_i^{\ \alpha } - \epsilon_{ijk}\ , b^j_{\ \alpha } \phi^{k\alpha}\\ p & = \frac{\alpha_3\lambda + \alpha_4a}{\alpha_3 \alpha_4 - a^2}\,;\qquad q = -\frac{\alpha_4 ^ 2 + a\lambda}{\alpha_3\alpha_4 - a^2}. \end{aligned}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the gauge generator @xmath31 which generates gauge symmetries is , by the dirac principle , a linear combination of all first class constraints @xmath32 the sum in @xmath33 running over the complete first - class sector .
the symmetries of the basic variables are then obtained through @xmath34 where @xmath35 indicates dirac brackets obtained through elimination of the second class sector @xmath25 @xcite .
now , we know that all the gauge parameters @xmath36 are not independent , as the number of independent gauge parameters must equal the number of independent primary first - class constraints . in the off - shell method that we adopt @xcite , the restriction on @xmath36 is obtained from the commutativity of gauge variations and time evolution @xmath37 explicit calculations @xcite yield the generator @xmath38\right . \\
\left.+ \dot{\sigma}^i\pi_i^{\ 0 } + \sigma^i\left[\bar{\mathcal{k}_i}-\varepsilon_{ijk}\big(b^j_{\ 0}\,\pi^{k0 } + \omega^j_{\ 0}\,\pi^{k0}\big)\right]\right ) \end{aligned}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath39 and @xmath40 are six independent gauge parameters .
we are now ready to study the gauge symmetries of the model utilising this generator .
the generator yields the following symmetries of the basic fields @xmath41 a first comparison of the two sets of symmetries and reveals that the hamiltonian symmetries are explicitly dependant on the coupling parameters of the various terms in the action , in contrast to the pgt symmetries . also , we note that the gauge parameters of the two symmetries are different .
so we need to map the gauge parameters of into the pgt gauge parameters .
this is achieved through the field dependent map @xcite @xmath42 using this map , the hamiltonian symmetries can be written in the form @xmath43 it may seem that the two symmetries are thus equivalent only on - shell . to show that this is not the case , we write out their form explicitly @xmath44 to cast the balance terms of @xmath45 into the form , we first write down the appropriate @xmath46 matrix : @xmath47 the anti - symmetry of the above structure can now be easily demonstrated .
as an example , @xmath48 so , we see that indeed ` @xmath49 ' is of the required form for trivial gauge symmetries .
thus the invariance of the action can now be achieved under these ` balance ' symmetries @xmath50 without the use of any equations of motion .
hence we see , that from a canonical point of view , @xmath51 as their difference is just an un - physical ` trivial ' symmetry .
99 henneaux m , teitelboim c and zanelli j 1990 nucl .
b * 332 * , 169 - 188 .
banerjee r , rothe h j and rothe k d 1999 phys .
b * 463 * 248 .
banerjee r , rothe h j and rothe k d 2000 phys .
b * 479 * , 429 .
utiyama r 1956 phys .
* 101 * 1597 .
kibble t w b 1961 j. math .
* 2 * 212 .
sciama d w 1962 _ recent developments in general relativity , festschrift for leopold infeld _
( new york : pergamon press ) p 415 .
banerjee r , gangopadhyay s , mukherjee p and roy d 2010 _ j. high energy phys .
_ jhep * 1002 * , 075 ( 2010 ) henneaux m and teitelboim c 1992 _ quantization of gauge systems _ ( princeton , usa : univ .
henneaux m , kleinschmidt a and gomez g l 2010 phys .
d * 81 * , 064002 .
castellani l 1982 annals phys . * 143 * , 357 .
baekler p , mielke e w and hehl f w 1992 nuovo cim .
b * 107 * 91 .
blagojevic m and cvetkovic b 2006 _ trends in gr and qc _ * 2 * ed ch benton ( new york : nova science ) 103 .
banerjee r and roy d 2011 phys .
d * 84 * , 124034 .
|
gauge symmetries systematic construction fraught subtleties must off - shell action invariant without equations motion systematic algorithms for construction off - shell symmetries models gravity gauging poincare symmetries approaches yield symmetries only on - shell off - shell level two independent symmetries unsettling additional independent constraints support only independent symmetries space - time translations lorentz boosts poincare symmetries model in poincare gauge theory formalism global poincare symmetries on global coordinates @xmath0 localised at every spacetime point local frames coordinates @xmath1 both sets 3-dimensional construction in any dimensions change physical variables from coordinates triad fields introduced defined through @xmath2 ` @xmath3 ' @xmath4 ' metrics of global local sets coordinates @xmath4 ' standard minkowskian metric with signature @xmath5 gauge connection field ` @xmath6 ' introduced through newly defined gauge covariant derivativearbitrary vector @xmath7 derivative @xmath8 field strengths gravitational fields @xmath9 b^i_{\ \rho } = \epsilon^i_{\ jk } r^j_{\ \mu\nu } b^k_{\ \rho}\end{aligned} @xmath10 defines riemann commutator @xmath11 derivatives torsion @xmath12 setting riemann - cartan spacetime riemann spacetime contains torsion zero after imposition connection variable s equation motion torsion free riemannian manifold general relativity poincare symmetries fields @xcite @xmath13 @xmath14 parametrizes local lorentz rotations @xmath15 coordinate translations constitute @xmath16 independent poincare symmetries in 3d symmetries independent action constructed proper tensorial manner symmetries action constructed hamiltonian analysis off - shell procedures symmetries action invariant identified poincare symmetries field - dependent redefinition symmetry identification trivial gauge symmetries @xcite symmetries form @xmath17 keep action invariant due antisymmetry coefficients @xmath18@xmath19 euler derivatives @xmath20 equations motion @xmath21 mielke - baekler model summarise hamiltonian constraints outline off - shell gauge generator generate gauge symmetries compared poincare symmetries mielke - baekler 3d topological gravity model torsion @xcite cosmological term described @xmath22{aligned equations motion setting euler derivatives zero @xmath23 = 0\delta\delta\omega^i_{\mu\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho }\alpha_3\ r_{i\nu\rho } + t{i\nu\rho\alpha_4\\epsilon_}b^j\nu^k\rho\right = 0{aligned} constraints model listed table tab constraints first class @xmath24 second class @xmath25 + primary @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 + secondary @xmath29 definitions @xmath30\nabla_{\alpha\phi_i^{\alpha +\epsilon_{ijk}\alpha\left^{k\alpha + q\alpha{\mathcal{k}} -\left\epsilon^{0\alpha\beta }\alpha\beta\alpha_3\alpha\beta \alpha_4\\epsilon_{ijk b^j_{\alpha_{ \beta\nabla_{\alpha\phi_i^{ \alpha \epsilon_{ijk} b^j_{\alpha\phi^{k\alpha{\alpha_3\lambda + \alpha_4a_3 \alpha_4 - a^2} -\frac{\alpha_4 2 +\lambda}\alpha_3\alpha_4 - a^2}{aligned} gauge generator @xmath31 generates gauge symmetries dirac principle linear combination of first class constraints @xmath32 sum in @xmath33 over first - class sector symmetries of basic variables obtained through @xmath34 @xmath35 indicates dirac brackets through elimination second class sector @xmath25 @xcite all gauge parameters @xmath36 not independent independent gauge parameters must equal primary first - class constraints restriction on @xmath36 from commutativity of gauge variations time evolution @xmath37 calculations @xcite yield generator @xmath38{aligned @xmath39 and @xmath40 six independent gauge parameters ready to study gauge symmetries model utilising generator generator yields symmetries of basic fields @xmath41 comparison symmetries hamiltonian symmetries dependant on coupling parameters of terms action contrast to pgt symmetries gauge parameters of two symmetries different need to map gauge parameters into pgt gauge parametersachieved through field dependent map @xcite @xmath42 hamiltonian symmetries written in form @xmath43 symmetries equivalent on - shell write form explicitly @xmath44 balance terms @xmath45 form write @xmath46 matrix @xmath47 anti - symmetry structure demonstrated @xmath48 @xmath49 required form for trivial gauge symmetries invariance action achieved under balance symmetries @xmath50 without equations motion @xmath51 difference un - physical trivial symmetry henneaux m teitelboim c zanelli j 1990 nucl 332 * 169 - 188 banerjee r rothe h j rothe k d 1999 phys 463 * 248 2000 phys 479 * 429 utiyama r 1956 phys 101 * 1597 kibble t 1961 212 sciama d 1962 developments general relativity new york pergamon press 415 banerjee gangopadhyay s mukherjee p roy d 2010 high energy phys . 1002 075 henneaux m teitelboim c 1992 quantization of gauge systems princeton usa univ henneaux kleinschmidt gomez g 2010 phys .81 064002 castellani 1982 annals phys 143 357 baekler mielke hehl f 1992 107 91 blagojevic cvetkovic b 2006 trends gr qc 2 benton new nova science ) 103 banerjee roy d 2011 phys 84 124034
| 0.43031
| 2,416
| 1,314
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,587
|
in this paper we present two different variants of method for symmetric matrix inversion , based on modified gaussian elimination .
both methods avoid computation of square roots and have a reduced machine time s spending .
further , both of them can be used efficiently not only for positive ( semi- ) definite , but for any non - singular symmetric matrix inversion .
we use simulation to verify results , which represented in this paper .
|
symmetric matrix inversion is one of the most important problem for many practical tasks e.g. analysis of electrical circuits with inductance elements @xcite , synthesis of kalman or wiener filters @xcite , using of finite element method @xcite .
existing symmetric matrix inversion methods are cholesky decomposition , ldl decomposition @xcite , bordering method @xcite , and the most efficient krishnamoorthy - menon s method ( based on cholesky decomposition , and requires @xmath0 operations with @xmath1 square roots computation ) @xcite .
the aim of this paper is to propose a symmetric matrix inversion method , which reduces machine time spending compared to krishnamoorthy - menon s method by avoiding of square root computations .
moreover , this fact allow us to use the proposed method for efficient inverse of symmetric matrix not only with strict diagonal dominance , but without diagonal dominance as well .
in this section shows modified gaussian elimination , which proposed method based on @xcite-@xcite .
let there is a system of linear equations ( [ sle ] ) , @xmath2 where @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 . during modified gaussian elimination an addition matrix @xmath6 changes instead of matrix @xmath7 , but
addition memory is not necessary in this case @xcite .
let vector @xmath8 consist of two types of variables : required , which should be find during elimination , and unrequired , which is not interesting for researcher .
re - solution of ( [ sle ] ) after some changes of @xmath7 could be done with reduced number of multiplications and divisions , using formulae from @xcite-@xcite .
let @xmath9 be an @xmath10 column of @xmath7 ; let @xmath11 be a matrix @xmath12 after @xmath13 change ; let @xmath14 be an @xmath10 row of @xmath11 , @xmath15 ; let @xmath16 , where @xmath17 is an identity matrix
. then solution of ( [ sle ] ) could be done with formulae ( [ modification ] ) below : * @xmath18 for @xmath19 , @xmath20 , and @xmath21 is an unrequired variable ; * @xmath22 for @xmath23 . if @xmath24 , then two rows of @xmath12 should be permitted .
such permutation is always possible for non - singular matrix @xmath7 ( see @xcite-@xcite ) ; * @xmath25 for other required @xmath26 ; * @xmath27 for any required @xmath21 . @xmath28 it can easily be checked that @xmath29 , @xmath30 , for any required @xmath21 and for @xmath31 , @xmath32 .
further , if all elements of @xmath8 are required variables , then @xmath33 .
matrix inversion using modified gaussian elimination requires @xmath34 multiplications and divisions . if only the last element @xmath35 of @xmath8 is a required variable , then gaussian elimination requires @xmath36 multiplies and divisions .
let @xmath37 be a number of required variables in @xmath8 : @xmath38 is a required variable .
then number of multiplies and divisions for gaussian elimination could be determined with formula @xmath39 ( see @xcite ) .
in this section shows a method for efficient symmetric matrix inversion based on modified gaussian elimination . the first variant of the proposed method consist of two different stages .
on the first stage we use formulae ( 2 ) for @xmath40 , and only @xmath35 is a required variable ( indeed , it is a valid proposition for @xmath41 as well ) . on the second stage we use addition formulae described below .
let us introduce some notation .
let @xmath42 be an element from @xmath10 row and @xmath43 column of @xmath44 ; let @xmath45 be an element from @xmath10 row and @xmath43 column of @xmath7 ; let @xmath46be a submatrix of @xmath44 , such that , @xmath47 , @xmath48 ; let @xmath49 be a submatrix of @xmath7 , such that @xmath50 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 .
it is easily shown that after the first stage @xmath12 is a lower triangular matrix .
after the second stage @xmath12 became a matrix @xmath51 , as if we use ( 2 ) for @xmath52 . for symmetric matrix inversion using modified gaussian elimination that is enough to use only lower triangular matrix .
to prove this statement , we need a lemma [ lemma_1 ] .
[ lemma_1 ] let @xmath44 is a matrix from ( [ modification ] ) for , . then @xmath53 . using ( [ modification ] ) , let us consider 4 cases .
let @xmath54 . then @xmath55 case 2
let @xmath56 . then @xmath57 case 3 .
. then @xmath59 it can be checked easily for @xmath60 , @xmath23 ; case 4 .
. then @xmath62 it can be checked easily for @xmath63 : @xmath64 , @xmath32 , .
since lemma [ lemma_1 ] , it follows that @xmath46 is a symmetric matrix .
this statement is needed for the second stage of the method .
let @xmath65 be a matrix @xmath12 after @xmath66 change , @xmath67 , where @xmath68 is a lower triangular matrix after the first stage , and @xmath33 .
let @xmath69 is an element from @xmath10 row and @xmath43 column of @xmath65 .
then the second stage describes with formulae below : * @xmath70 for @xmath71 , @xmath31 , @xmath72 , and for @xmath73 , @xmath74 , @xmath75 ; * @xmath76 for @xmath73 , @xmath77 , .
@xmath78 it is easily to prove that @xmath79 , where @xmath80 is a diagonal matrix , such that @xmath81 , @xmath82 .
number of multiplications and divisions for the first stage of the method describes with formula @xmath36 , as we note earlier .
it is easily shown that number of multiplications and divisions for the second stage describes with formula .
both stages for symmetric matrix inversion using the first variant of the proposed method requires @xmath83 multiplications and divisions .
it is less then requirements of cholesky decomposition or ldl decomposition ( see table 1 ) .
let us remark that proposed method avoid square root computations ; this considerably reduce machine time spending , and make it possible to use proposed method not only for positive determined , but for any invertable symmetric matrices as well . the second variant of the proposed method consist of only one stage .
suppose , that @xmath84 where @xmath85 , but all elements from @xmath86 row of @xmath87 are zeros .
let @xmath88 be an element of @xmath10 row and @xmath43 column of @xmath11 ; let @xmath89 be a @xmath43 column of @xmath11 . for explanation of the following formulae
, we need a lemma [ lemma_2 ] .
[ lemma_2 ] let @xmath44 is a matrix from ( [ modification ] ) for @xmath52 , @xmath23 .
then @xmath90 from ( [ second_variant ] ) be @xmath91 . from ( [ second_variant ] ) @xmath92 .
using ( [ modification ] ) , we get \1 . @xmath93 \2 . @xmath94 if we combine lemma [ lemma_1 ] with lemma [ lemma_2 ] , we get formulae below : * @xmath95 for @xmath23 , , * @xmath96 for @xmath97 , , * @xmath98 for @xmath20 , @xmath99 , @xmath100 , @xmath101 , * @xmath102 for @xmath20 , @xmath99 , * @xmath103 for @xmath104 , @xmath105 , , * @xmath106 for @xmath97 , @xmath82 , @xmath107 .
@xmath108 the formulae ( [ second_a ] ) describe an idea of the method in detail , but for practical tasks it is better to use different formulae : * @xmath109 for @xmath23 , , * @xmath96 for @xmath97 , , * @xmath98 for @xmath110 , @xmath111 , , * @xmath112 for @xmath20 , @xmath113 , @xmath77 , * @xmath103 for @xmath97 , @xmath82 , , * @xmath106 for @xmath20 , @xmath113 , .
@xmath114 it can easily be shown that ( [ second_a ] ) and ( [ second_b ] ) are equivalent . number of multiplications and divisions for the second variant of the proposed method describes with formulae .
it is less then requirements of cholesky decomposition , ldl decomposition or krishnamoorthy - mennon method .
it is the same requirements as for bordering method , but it should be noted that bordering method could not be use for inversion of matrix with @xmath115 , @xmath82 , where @xmath116 is a minor of @xmath7 , @xmath82 , @xmath31 . at the same time , proposed method could be use for inversion of matrix with @xmath117 , if @xmath7 is not a singular matrix .
let us remark that the second variant of the proposed method avoid square root computations as well .
in order to demonstrate advantages of the proposed algorithms , we use matlab based simulation via different cpus . we give results for intel core i5 - 3230 m 2.60 ghz below ( intel pentium dual core t 2390 1.86 ghz and intel atom n450 1.67 ghz gives familiar results ) .
we compare proposed algorithms with the most efficient notable algorithms for symmetric matrix inversion : cholesky decomposition @xcite , ldl decomposition @xcite , and krishnamoorthy - mennon method @xcite , @xcite , @xcite . we generate table with full equations , which describes number of multiplications , divisions and square roots computation for every noted method . the first row of the table 1 describes cholesky decomposition and solving of systems of linear equations @xmath118 , and @xmath119 .
the second row describes ldl decomposition and solving of sle @xmath120 , @xmath121 , and @xmath122 .
the third row describes matrix inversion using krishnamoorthy - mennon method , based on cholesky decomposition @xcite , @xcite .
the fourth row describes the first variant , and the fifth row describes the second variant of the proposed method .
experiment 1 .
inversion of a real symmetric matrix with strict diagonal dominance .
let @xmath123 be a number of multiplications and divisions , and @xmath124 be a number of square root computations , determined with formulae from the table 1 .
let @xmath125 and @xmath126 be numbers of operations , determined with counter variables from matlab scripts .
results of the experiment are given in tables 2 and 3 .
experiment 2 .
inversion of real symmetric matrices of order @xmath1 with strict diagonal dominance .
let @xmath127 be a time for matrix inversion ; let @xmath128 be a second @xmath129 , where @xmath130 is a matrix , inverted via one of described methods , and @xmath131 is a matrix , inverted via matlab function @xmath132 .
results of the experiment are given in tables 4 and 5 .
experiment 3 .
inversion of real symmetric matrices of order @xmath1 without diagonal dominance .
results of the experiment are given in the table 6 .
from tables 2 and 3 we can conclude that formulae from the table 1 are correct . from tables 4 and 5
we can conclude that both variants of the proposed method provide notable reduction of machine time spending and has a good accuracy . from the table 6
we can conclude that both variants of the proposed method increase advantages for matrices without diagonal dominance .
let us remark that it is especially important for inductance matrix inversion .
we propose a new method for symmetric matrix inversion based on modified gaussian elimination with avoiding of square root computations .
proposed method could be useful for any scientific and technical problem with symmetric matrix inversion , especially if matrix has not a diagonal dominance .
chua , l. o. ; lin , p .-
: `` _ _ machine analysis of electronic circuits _ _ '' , in russian , the energy , moscow , 1980 .
happonen , a. , burian , a. , hemming , e. : `` a reconfigurable processing elements implementation for matrix inversion using cholesky decomposition '' _ world academy of science , engineering and technology international journal of computer , information , systems and control engineering _ , 2007 , vol:1 no:3 .
streng , g , fix , g. : `` _ _ an analysis of the finite element method _ _ '' , in russian , the world , 1977 .
golub , g. h. ; loan , c. f. v. : `` _ _ matrix computations _ _ '' , in russian , the world , moscow , 1999 .
krylov , v. i. , bobkov , v. v. , monastyrskii , p. i. : `` _ _ numerical methods in applied mathematics _ _ '' , in russian , the higher school , 1972 .
krishnamoorthy , a. ; menon , d. : matrix inversion using cholesky decomposition , _ arxiv.org : url : http://arxiv.org / abs/1111.4144_. krishnamoorthy , a. , menon d. : `` matrix inversion using cholesky decomposition '' , _ ieee signal processing : algorithms , architectures , arrangements , and applications ( spa ) conference .
_ 26 - 28th of september , 2013
. poznan , poland .
savelov , n. s. : `` transient analysis for preliminarily ordered electrical circuits '' , in russian , _ russian electromechanic _ , 1985 ,
no:4 , p. 85 - 92 .
savelov , n. s. : `` forming of state equation for changing electrical circuits '' , in russian , _ russian electromechanic _ , 1987 ,
no:12 , p. 13 - 18 .
savelov , n. s. , kochubei , p. m. : `` fast electrical circuit analysis with multiprocessor system '' , in russian , _ russian electromechanic _ , 2012 , no:5 ,
savelov , n. s. , khlyntsev s. g. : `` efficient method for parametric synthesis of electrical circuits '' , in russian , _ russian electromechanic _
, 2013 , no:5 , p. 9
savelov , n. s. , kochnev , a. v. : `` fast electrical circuit analysis with reduced machine time and memory spending '' , in russian , _ russian electromechanic _ , 2013 ,
no:4 , p. 3
samarskii a. a. , gulin , a. v. : `` _ _ numerical methods _ _ '' , in russian , the science , moscow , 1989 .
matlabcentral / 1994 - 2014 the mathworks , inc . : _ http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/41957-matrix-inversion-using-cholesky-decomposition _
|
symmetric matrix inversion important problem for practical tasks analysis electrical circuits with inductance elements synthesis kalman wiener filters finite element method existing matrix inversion methods are cholesky decomposition ldl decomposition bordering method efficient krishnamoorthy - menon s method requires operations with @xmath1 square roots computation aim paper propose symmetric matrix inversion method reduces machine time spending avoiding square root computations use proposed method for efficient inverse symmetric matrix with strict diagonal dominance without diagonal dominance section shows modified gaussian elimination method based on @xcite system of linear equations @xmath2 @xmath3 addition matrix @xmath6 changes instead of @xmath7 addition memory not necessary vector @xmath8 two types variables required unrequired re - solution of ) after changes @xmath7 with reduced number multiplications divisions using formulae from @xcite- @xmath9 @xmath10 column @xmath7 @xmath11 matrix @xmath12 after @xmath13 change @xmath14 @xmath10 row of @xmath11 @xmath16 @xmath17 identity matrix solution with formulae modification @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath21 unrequired variable @xmath22 for @xmath23 @xmath24 two rows of @xmath12 permitted permutation possible for non - singular matrix @xmath7 @xmath25 required @xmath26 @xmath27 required @xmath21 @xmath28 checked @xmath29 @xmath30 required @xmath21 @xmath31 @xmath32 elements @xmath8 required variables @xmath33 matrix inversion requires @xmath34 multiplications divisions last element @xmath35 required variable requires @xmath36 multiplies divisions @xmath37 required variables @xmath8 @xmath38 required variable number multiplies divisions gaussian elimination determined with formula @xmath39 section method for efficient symmetric matrix inversion modified gaussian elimination first variant two stages first stage formulae ( 2 ) for @xmath40 @xmath35 required variable valid for @xmath41second stage use addition formulae introduce notation @xmath42 element from @xmath10 row @xmath43 column @xmath44 @xmath45 element @xmath10 row @xmath43 column @xmath7 @xmath46be submatrix of @xmath44 @xmath47 @xmath49 submatrix @xmath7 @xmath50 first stage @xmath12 lower triangular matrix second stage @xmath12 matrix @xmath51 use ( 2 ) for @xmath52 symmetric matrix inversion modified gaussian elimination use lower triangular matrix prove need lemma [ lemma_1 ] @xmath44 matrix from [ modification ] @xmath53 consider 4 cases @xmath54 @xmath55 case 2 @xmath56 @xmath57 3 @xmath59 checked for @xmath60 @xmath23 @xmath62 checked @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath32 @xmath46 symmetric matrix statement needed second stage @xmath65 matrix @xmath12 after @xmath66 change @xmath67 @xmath68 lower triangular matrix after first stage @xmath33 @xmath69 element from @xmath10 row @xmath43 column of @xmath65 second stage describes formulae @xmath70 for @xmath71 @xmath31 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 for @xmath73 @xmath77 @xmath78 prove @xmath79 @xmath80 diagonal matrix @xmath81 @xmath82 multiplications divisions first stage describes formula @xmath36 multiplications divisions second stage formula stages symmetric matrix inversion variant requires @xmath83 multiplications divisions less then requirements cholesky decomposition ldl decomposition 1 proposed method square root computations machine time spending positive determined invertable symmetric matrices second variant one stage @xmath84 @xmath85 elements from @xmath86 row of @xmath87 zeros @xmath88 element @xmath10 row @xmath43 column of @xmath11 @xmath89 @xmath43 column of @xmath11 explanation formulae need lemma_2 ] @xmath44 matrix from @xmath52 @xmath23 @xmath90 second_variant @xmath91 @xmath92 modification ] get @xmath93\2 @xmath94 combine lemma lemma_1_2 get formulae @xmath95 @xmath23 @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath20 @xmath102 @xmath20 @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath106 for @xmath97 @xmath82 @xmath107 @xmath108 formulae second_a ] describe method practical tasks use different formulae @xmath109 for @xmath23 @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath110 @xmath111 @xmath112 for @xmath20 @xmath113 @xmath77 @xmath103 for @xmath97 @xmath82 @xmath106 for @xmath20 @xmath113 @xmath114 second_a ] second_b ] ) equivalent number multiplications divisions second variant method formulae less requirements of cholesky decomposition ldl decomposition krishnamoorthy - mennon method same requirements bordering method bordering method inversion of matrix with @xmath115 @xmath82 @xmath116 minor of @xmath7 @xmath82 @xmath31proposed method for inversion matrix with @xmath117 if @xmath7 not singular second variant square root computations matlab simulation different cpus results for intel core i5 - 3230 m 2.60 ghz intel pentium dual core t 2390 1.86 ghz intel atom n450 1.67 ghz compare algorithms with algorithms symmetric matrix inversion cholesky decomposition ldl decomposition krishnamoorthy - mennon method table with full equations multiplications divisions square roots for first row cholesky decomposition linear equations @xmath118 @xmath119 second row ldl decomposition solving @xmath120 @xmath121 @xmath122 third row matrix inversion using krishnamoorthy - mennon method cholesky decomposition fourth row first variant fifth row second variant experiment 1 inversion of symmetric matrix with strict diagonal dominance @xmath123 multiplications divisions @xmath124 square root computations determined with formulae @xmath125 @xmath126 operations determined with counter variables from matlab scripts results in tables 2 and 3inversion symmetric matrices @xmath1 diagonal dominance @xmath127 matrix inversion @xmath128 second @xmath129 @xmath130 matrix inverted described methods @xmath131 matrix inverted matlab function @xmath132 results experiment tables 4 5 experiment 3 inversion symmetric matrices @xmath1 without diagonal dominance results table 6 tables 2 3 formulae table 1 correct tables 4 5 variants method reduction machine time spending good accuracy table 6 both variants increase advantages matrices without diagonal dominance important inductance matrix inversion propose new method symmetric matrix inversion modified gaussian elimination avoiding root computations method useful scientific technical problem symmetric matrix inversion matrix not diagonal dominance chua , l. lin , p machine analysis electronic circuits russian energy moscow 1980 happonen burian hemming reconfigurable processing elements implementation matrix inversion cholesky decomposition world academy science engineering technology international journal computer information systems control engineering 2007 vol:1 no:3 streng , g fix analysis finite element method russian world 1977 golub g. loan c. f.matrix computations russian world moscow 1999 krylov v bobkov monastyrskii p numerical methods applied mathematics russian higher school 1972 krishnamoorthy a. menon d. matrix inversion cholesky decomposition arxiv.org http://arxiv.org abs/1111.4144 krishnamoorthy menon. matrix inversion cholesky decomposition signal processing algorithms arrangements applications conference 26 - 28th september 2013 poznan poland savelov n. s. transient analysis preliminarily ordered electrical circuits russian electromechanic 1985 no:4 p. 85 - 92 savelov forming state equation changing electrical circuits russian electromechanic 1987 no:12 p. 13 - 18 savelov kochubei fast electrical circuit analysis multiprocessor system russian electromechanic 2012 no:5 savelov khlyntsev s.. efficient method parametric synthesis electrical circuits russian electromechanic 2013 no:5 p. 9 savelov kochnev afast electrical circuit analysis reduced machine time memory spending russian electromechanic 2013 no:4 p. 3 samarskii gulin numerical methods russian science moscow 1989 matlabcentral 1994 - 2014 mathworks http://www/fileexchange/41957-matrix-inversion-cholesky-decomposition
| 0.567727
| 3,486
| 1,883
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,599
|
we argue that the allowed range of the mass of the lightest neutralino in the mnssm is limited .
we establish the theoretical upper bound on the lightest neutralino mass and obtain an approximate solution for this mass .
|
recent observations indicate that @xmath0 of the energy density of the universe exists in the form of stable non
baryonic , non luminos ( dark ) matter .
supersymmetric ( susy ) models provide a good candidate for the cold dark matter component of the universe . if r
parity is conserved , the lightest neutralino is absolutely stable and can play the role of dark matter .
however the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) suffers from the so - called @xmath1problem .
the mssm superpotential contains only one bilinear term @xmath2 .
the parameter @xmath1 is expected to be of the order of @xmath3 or gut scale . at the same time
the correct pattern of electroweak ( ew ) symmetry breaking requires @xmath4 .
the @xmath1problem can be solved within the minimal non minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mnssm ) .
the superpotential of the mnssm can be written as @xmath5 at the ew scale the singlet superfield @xmath6 gets non - zero vacuum expectation value ( vev ) @xmath7 and an effective @xmath1-term ( @xmath8 ) is generated .
thus in the mnssm the @xmath1 problem is solved in a similar way to the next to minimal supersymmetric standard model ( nmssm ) , but without the accompanying problems of singlet tadpoles or domain walls .
the neutralino sector of the mnssm is formed by the superpartners of the neutral gauge bosons ( @xmath9 ) and neutral higgsino fields ( @xmath10,@xmath11,@xmath12 ) . in the field basis @xmath13 the neutralino mass matrix takes a form @xmath14 0 & m_2 & m_z c_w c_{\beta } & -m_z c_w s_{\beta } & 0 \\[2 mm ] -m_z s_w c_{\beta } & m_z c_w c_{\beta } & 0 & -\mu_{eff } & -\frac{\lambda v}{\sqrt{2 } } s_{\beta } \\[2 mm ] m_z s_w s_{\beta } & -m_z c_w s_{\beta } & -\mu_{eff } & 0 & -\frac{\lambda v}{\sqrt{2 } } c_{\beta } \\[2 mm ] 0 & 0 & -\frac{\lambda v}{\sqrt{2 } } s_{\beta } & -\frac{\lambda v}{\sqrt{2 } } c_{\beta } & 0 \end{array } \right)\,,\ ] ] where @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , and @xmath18 . here @xmath19 and @xmath20 , where @xmath21 and @xmath22 are the vevs of @xmath23 and @xmath24 , respectively . the neutralino spectrum in the mnssm may be parametrised in terms of @xmath25 in the minimal sugra inspired susy gut s @xmath26 .
the validity of perturbation theory up to the gut scale implies that @xmath27 .
when @xmath28 is small the non observation of higgs bosons at lep rules out @xmath29 .
lep searches for susy particles also set lower bounds on @xmath30 . in order to find theoretical bounds on the neutralino masses
@xmath31 it is convenient to consider the matrix @xmath32 . in the basis @xmath33 the bottom - right @xmath34 block of
@xmath35 takes the form @xmath36 where @xmath37 , @xmath38 .
since the minimal eigenvalue of any hermitian matrix is less than its smallest diagonal element at least one neutralino in the mnssm is always light , i.e. @xmath39 . therefore in contrast with the mssm the lightest neutralino in the mnssm remains light even when the susy breaking scale tends to infinity .
the mass of the lightest neutralino must be also smaller than the minimal eigenvalue @xmath40 of the submatrix ( [ 4 ] ) , i.e. @xmath41\,.\ ] ] the value of @xmath42 decreases with increasing @xmath43 . taking into account the restrictions on @xmath43 and @xmath44 we find that @xmath45 @xcite .
the obtained theoretical restriction on @xmath46 allows to discriminate the mnssm from other susy models .
the mass of the lightest neutralino can be computed numerically by solving the characteristic equation @xmath47 + m_z^2\biggl(\tilde{m}-\kappa\biggr)\biggl(\kappa^2+\mu_{eff}\sin 2\beta \kappa- \nu^2\biggr)=0\ , , \end{array}\ ] ] where @xmath48 . because in the mnssm @xmath46 is normally much smaller than the masses of the other neutralinos one can ignore @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 terms in the characteristic equation so that it reduces to @xmath52 where @xmath53 @xmath54 then the mass of the lightest neutralino can be approximated by @xcite @xmath55 as follows from fig .
12 the approximate solution describes the numerical one with relatively high accuracy . with increasing @xmath56 and @xmath57 the lightest neutralino mass decreases .
if either @xmath43 or @xmath58 then @xmath59 according to eq.([11 ] ) @xmath60 is inversely proportional to @xmath56 .
it decreases when @xmath61 grows and vanishes when @xmath28 tends to zero .
when @xmath62 the mass of the lightest neutralino is proportional to @xmath63 .
when @xmath64 the lightest neutralino is predominantly singlino that makes its direct observation at future colliders rather challenging .
|
observations indicate @xmath0 energy density universe exists stable non baryonic non luminos dark matter supersymmetric models candidate for cold dark matter if r parity conserved lightest neutralino stable dark matter minimal supersymmetric standard model suffers @xmath1problem superpotential contains one bilinear term @xmath2 parameter @xmath1 expected @xmath3 or scale electroweak symmetry breaking requires @xmath4 @xmath1problem solved within supersymmetric standard model mnssm superpotential written as @xmath5 singlet superfield @xmath6 gets non - zero vacuum expectation value @xmath7 effective @xmath1-term ( @xmath8 ) generated in mnssm @xmath1 problem solved without problems singlet tadpoles domain walls neutralino sector formed by superpartners neutral gauge bosons @xmath9 ) neutral higgsino fields @xmath10,@xmath11@xmath12 )field basis @xmath13 neutralino mass matrix @xmath14 0_z c c{\beta -m_z c s{\beta \\[2 mm s c{\beta c_w c{\beta -\mu_{eff -\frac\lambda s_{\beta \\[2 mm m_z s_w s{\beta -m_z c_w s{\beta -\mu{eff -\frac\lambda c{\beta \\[2 mm 0 -\frac s{\beta } c_{\beta } 0{array @xmath15 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 vevs @xmath23 @xmath24 neutralino spectrum mnssm parametrised @xmath25 minimal sugra susy gut @xmath26 validity perturbation theory gut scale @xmath27 @xmath28 small non observation higgs bosons lep rules out @xmath29 lep searches susy particles lower bounds @xmath30 find theoretical bounds neutralino masses @xmath31 consider matrix @xmath32basis @xmath33 bottom - right @xmath34 block @xmath35 form @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 minimal eigenvalue hermitian matrix less than smallest diagonal element one neutralino mnssm light @xmath39 contrast mssm lightest neutralino mnssm remains light susy breaking scale infinity mass lightest neutralino smaller than minimal eigenvalue @xmath40 submatrix @xmath41 value @xmath42 decreases increasing @xmath43 restrictions @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 restriction @xmath46 allows discriminate mnssm susy models mass lightest neutralino computed numerically solving characteristic equation @xmath47 + m_z^2\biggl @xmath48 mnssm @xmath46 smaller other neutralinos ignore @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 terms equation reduces to @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 mass lightest neutralino approximated by @xcite @xmath55 fig 12 approximate solution accuracy increasing @xmath56 @xmath57 lightest neutralino mass decreases@xmath43 or @xmath58 @xmath59. @xmath60 proportional @xmath56 decreases @xmath61 grows vanishes @xmath28 zero @xmath62 mass lightest neutralino proportional @xmath63 @xmath64 lightest neutralino singlino observation challenging
| 0.257637
| 1,331
| 711
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,602
|
statistical properties of interbeat intervals cascade are evaluated by considering the joint probability distribution @xmath0 for two interbeat increments @xmath1 and @xmath2 of different time scales @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
we present evidence that the conditional probability distribution @xmath5 may obey a chapman - kolmogorov equation .
the corresponding kramers - moyal ( km ) coefficients are evaluated .
it is shown that while the first and second km coefficients , i.e. , the drift and diffusion coefficients , take on well - defined and significant values , the higher - order coefficients in the km expansion are very small . as a result
, the joint probability distributions of the increments in the interbeat intervals obey a fokker - planck equation .
the method provides a novel technique for distinguishing the two classes of subjects in terms of the drift and diffusion coefficients , which behave differently for two classes of the subjects , namely , healthy subjects and those with congestive heart failure .
= 2 17 cm 112 cm = 2 ]
|
cardiac interbeat intervals normally fluctuate in a complex manner.@xmath6 recent studies reveal that under normal conditions , beat - to - beat fluctuations in the heart rate may display extended correlations of the type typically exhibited by dynamical systems far from equilibrium .
it has been argued,@xmath7 for example , that the various stages of sleep may be characterized by long - range correlations of heart rates separated by a large number of beats .
the interbeat fluctuations in the heart rates belong to a much broader class of many natural , as well as man - made , phenomena that are characterized by a degree of stochasticity .
turbulent flows , fluctuations in the stock market prices , seismic recordings , the internet traffic , and pressure fluctuations in packed - bed chemical reactors are example of time - dependent stochastic phenomena , while the surface roughness of many materials@xmath8 are examples of such phenomena that are length scale - dependent .
the focus of the present paper is on the intriguing statistical properties of interbeat interval sequences , the analysis of which has attracted the attention of researchers from different disciplines.@xmath9 analysis of heartbeat fluctuations focused initially on short - time oscillations associated with breathing , blood pressure and neuroautonomic control.@xmath10 studies of longer heartbeat records , however , revealed @xmath11like behavior.@xmath12 recent analysis of very long time series indicates that under healthy conditions , interbeat intervals may exhibit power - law anticorrelations,@xmath13 follow universal scaling in their distributions,@xmath14 and are characterized by a broad multifractal spectrum.@xmath15 such scaling features change with the disease and advanced age.@xmath16 the possible existence of scale - invariant properties in the seemingly noisy heartbeat fluctuations is may be attributed to highly complex , nonlinear mechanisms of physiological control,@xmath17 as it is known that circadian rhythms are associated with periodic changes in key physiological processes.@xmath18 in figure 1 samples of interbeats fluctuations of healthy subjects and those with congestive heart failure ( chf ) are shown .
= 9truecm recently , friedrich and peinke were able@xmath19 to derive a fokker - planck ( fp ) equation for describing the evolution of the probability distribution function of stochastic properties of turbulent free jets , in terms of the relevant length scale .
they pointed out that the conditional probability density of the _ increments _ of a stochastic field ( for example , the increments in the velocity field in turbulent flow ) satisfies the chapman - kolmogorov ( ck ) equation , even though the the velocity field itself contains long - range , nondecaying correlations .
as is well - known , satisfying the ck equation is a necessary condition for any fluctuating data to be a markovian process over the relevant length ( or time ) scales.@xmath20 hence , one has a way of analyzing stochastic phenomena in terms of the corresponding fp and ck equations . in this paper
the method proposed by friedrich and peinke is used to compute the kramers - moyal ( km ) coefficients for the _ increments _ of interbeat intervals fluctuatations , @xmath21 . here
, @xmath22 is the interbeat increments which , for all the samples , is defined as , @xmath23 , where @xmath24 is the standard deviations of the increments in the interbeats data .
it is shown that the first and second km coefficients representing , respectively , the drift and diffusion coefficients in the fp equation , have well - defined values , while the third- and fourth - order km coefficients are small .
therefore , a fp evolution equation@xmath20 is developed for the probability density function ( pdf ) @xmath25 which , in turn , is used to gain information on changing the shape of pdf as a function of the time scale @xmath26 ( see also ref . [ 37 ] for another interesting and carefully - analyzed example of the application of the ck equation to stochastic phenomena ) .
the plan of this paper is as follows . in section 2
we describe the friedrich - peinke method in terms of a km expansion and the fp equation .
we then apply the method in section 3 to the analysis of the increments in the interbeat fluctuations .
a complete characterization of the statistical properties of the interbeat fluctuation requires evaluation of the joint pdfs , @xmath27 , for an arbitrary @xmath28 , the number of data points .
if the phenomenon is a markov process , an important simplification arises in that , the @xmath28-point joint pdf @xmath29 is generated by the product of the conditional probabilities @xmath30 , for @xmath31 .
thus , as the first step of analyzing a stochastic time series , we check whether the increments in the data follow a markov chain .
as mentioned above , a necessary condition for a stochastic phenomenon to be a markov process is that the ck equation,@xmath19
@xmath32 should hold for any value of @xmath33 , in the interval @xmath34 therefore , we check the validity of the ck equation for describing the data using many values of the @xmath1 triplets , by comparing the directly - evaluated conditional probability distributions @xmath35 with those calculated according to right - hand side of eq .
( 1 ) . in fig .
2 , the directly - computed pdf is compared with the one obtained from eq . ( 1 ) . allowing for a statistical error of the order of the square root of the number of events in each bin , we find that the pdfs are statistically identical . = 9truecm it is well - known that the ck equation yields an evolution equation for the distribution function @xmath25 across the scales @xmath36 .
the ck equation , when formulated in differential form , yields a master equation , which takes on the form of a fp equation:@xmath20 @xmath37p(\delta x,\tau)\;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the drift and diffusion coefficients , @xmath38 and @xmath39 , are estimated directly from the data and the moments @xmath40 of the conditional probability distributions : @xmath41 @xmath42 the coefficients @xmath43 are known as the kramers - moyal ( km ) coefficients . as an application of the method , we analyzed both daytime ( 12:00 pm to 18:00 pm ) and nighttime ( 12:00 am to 6:00 am ) heartbeat time series of healthy subjects , and the daytime records of patients with chf .
our data base includes 10 healthy subjects ( 7 females and 3 males with ages between 20 and 50 , and an average age of 34.3 years ) , and 12 subjects with chf , with 3 females and 9 males with ages between 22 and 71 , and an average age of 60.8 years ) .
the resulting drift and diffusion coefficients , @xmath44 and @xmath45 , are displayed in figures 3 and 4 .
it turns out that the drift coefficient @xmath44 is a linear function of @xmath22 , whereas the diffusivity @xmath45 is quadratic in @xmath22 .
estimates of these coefficients are less accurate for large values of @xmath22 and , thus , the uncertainties increase . using the data set for the healthy subjects we find that , = 9truecm = 9truecm @xmath46 whereas for the patients with chf we obtain , @xmath47 we also computed the _
average _ of the coefficients @xmath44 and @xmath45 for the entire set of the healthy subjects , as well as those with chf .
according to the pawulas theorem,@xmath48 the km expansion is truncated after the second term , provided that the fourth - order coefficient @xmath49 vanishes .
for the data that we analyze the coefficient @xmath50 is about @xmath51 for the healthy subjects , and about @xmath52 for those with chf .
equations ( 5 ) and ( 6 ) state that the drift coefficients for the healthy subjects and those with chf have the same order of magnitude , whereas the diffusion coefficients for given @xmath36 and @xmath22 are different by about one order of magnitude .
this points to a relatively simple way of distinguishing the two classes of the subjects .
moreover , the @xmath36-dependence of the diffusion coefficient for the healthy subjects is stronger than that of those with chf ( in the sense that the numerical coefficients of the @xmath53 are larger for the healthy subjects ) .
these are shown in figures 3 and 4 .
the strong @xmath54dependence of the diffusion coefficient @xmath45 for the healthy subjects indicates that the nature of the pdf of their increments @xmath22 for given @xmath36 , i.e. , @xmath25 , is intermittent , and that its shape should change strongly with @xmath36 .
however , for the subjects with chf the pdf is not so sensitive to the change of the time scale @xmath36 , hence indicating that the increments fluctuations for the subjects with chf is _ not _ intermittent .
these results are completely compatible with the recent discoveries that the interbeat fluctuations for healthy subjects and those with chf have fractal and multifractal properties , respectively.@xmath15
we have shown that the probability density of the interbeat interval increments satisfies a fokker - planck equation , which encodes the markovian nature of the increments fluctuations .
we have been able to compute reliably the first two kramers - moyal coefficients for the stochastic processes @xmath22 - the drift and diffusion coefficients in the fp representation - and , using the polynomial ansatz,@xmath19 obtain simple expressions for them in terms of @xmath22 and the time scale @xmath36 .
we have shown that the drift and diffusion coefficients of the increments in the interbeat fluctuations of healthy subjects and patients with chf have different behavior , when analyzed by the method we use in this paper .
hence , they help one to distinguish the two groups of the subjects . moreover
, one can obtain the form of the path probability functional of the increments in the interbeat intervals in the time scale , which naturally encodes the scale dependence of the probability density .
this , in turn , provides a clear physical picture of the intermittent nature of interbeat intervals fluctuations .
let us emphasize that the previous analysis@xmath6 of the data that we consider in this paper indicated that there may be long - range correlations in the data which might be characterized by self - affine fractal distributions , such as the fractional brownian motion or other types of stochastic processes that give rise to such correlations
. in that method one distinguishes healthy subjects from those with chf in terms of the _ type _ of the correlations that might exist in the data .
for example , if the data follow a fractional brownian motion , then the corresponding hurst exponent @xmath55 is used to distinguish the two classes of the subjects , as @xmath56 ( @xmath57 ) indicates negative ( positive ) correlations in the data , while @xmath58 indicates that the increments in the data follow brownian motion .
the method proposed in the present paper is different from such analyses in that , the _ increments _ in the data are analyzed in terms of markov processes .
this is _ not _ in contradiction with the previous analyses .
our analysis does indicate the existence of correlations in the increments , but , as is well - known in the theory of markov processes , such correlations , though extended , eventually decay .
we distinguish the healthy subjects from those with chf in terms of the _ differences _ between the drift and diffusion coefficients of the fokker - plank equation that we construct for the incremental data which , in our view , provides a clearer and more physical way of understanding the differences between the two groups of the subjects than the previous method .
lipsitz , j. mietus , g.b .
moody , and a.l .
goldberger , _ circulation _ * 81 * , 1803 ( 1990 ) ; d.t .
kaplan , _ et al .
_ , _ biophys
. j. _ * 59 * , 945 ( 1991 ) ; n. iyengar , _ et al .
_ , _ am . j. physiol . _ * 271 * , r1078 ( 1996 ) .
peng , s.v .
buldyrev , s. havlin , m. simons , h.e .
stanley , and a.l .
goldberger , _ phys .
e _ * 49 * 1685 ( 1994 ) ; c .- k .
peng , j.m .
hausdorff , and a.l .
goldberger , in _ nonlinear dynamics , self - organization , and biomedicine _ , edited by j. walleczek ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 1999 ) .
|
cardiac interbeat intervals fluctuate studies reveal normal conditions beat - to - beat fluctuations display extended correlations dynamical systems argued stages of sleep by long - range correlations of heart rates separated beats interbeat fluctuations belong to broader class natural man - made phenomena stochasticity turbulent flows stock market prices seismic recordings internet traffic pressure fluctuations in chemical reactors time - dependent stochastic phenomena surface roughness of materials length scale - dependent focus paper on statistical properties of interbeat interval sequences attracted attention researchers analysis of heartbeat fluctuations focused on short - time oscillations breathing blood pressure neuroautonomic control studies longer heartbeat records revealed behavior analysis under healthy conditions interbeat intervals may exhibit power - law anticorrelations follow universal scaling broad multifractal spectrum scaling features change with disease advanced age scale - invariant properties in heartbeat fluctuations attributed to complex nonlinear mechanisms of physiological control circadian rhythms associated with changes in physiological processes@xmath18 figure 1 samples interbeats fluctuations healthy subjects congestive heart failure shown friedrich peinke fokker - planck fp ) equation evolution probability distribution function stochastic properties turbulent free jets relevant length scale conditional probability density increments stochastic field increments velocity field turbulent flow satisfies chapman - kolmogorov ck ) equation velocity field contains long - range nondecaying correlations satisfying ck equation necessary condition for fluctuating data markovian process over relevant length time scales@xmath20 analyzing stochastic phenomena fp ck equations method proposed friedrich peinke compute kramers - moyal km ) coefficients for increments interbeat intervals fluctuatations @xmath22 interbeat increments defined as @xmath23 @xmath24 standard deviations of increments interbeats data first second km coefficients drift diffusion coefficients fp equation well - defined values third- fourth - order km coefficients smallfp evolution equation@xmath20 developed for probability density function @xmath25 used information changing shape pdf time scale @xmath26 ref 37 ] application ck equation stochastic phenomena plan paper section 2 friedrich - peinke method km expansion fp equation apply method section 3 analysis increments interbeat fluctuations characterization statistical properties interbeat fluctuation requires evaluation joint pdfs @xmath27 arbitrary @xmath28 number data points if markov process @xmath28-point joint pdf @xmath29 generated by conditional probabilities @xmath30 @xmath31 first step analyzing stochastic time series check increments data follow markov chain condition phenomenon markov ck equation@xmath19 @xmath32 hold for any value @xmath33 interval @xmath34 check validity ck equation data values @xmath1 triplets comparing directly - evaluated conditional probability distributions @xmath35 with calculated right - hand side eq . ( 1 ) fig . 2 directly - computed pdf compared with eq . ( 1 )statistical error square root number events each bin pdfs statistically identical ck equation yields evolution equation distribution function @xmath25 scales @xmath36 ck equation differential form yields master equation fp equation@xmath20 @xmath37p x drift diffusion coefficients @xmath38 @xmath39 estimated from data moments @xmath40 conditional probability distributions @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 kramers - moyal km ) coefficients analyzed daytime nighttime 12:00 6:00 heartbeat time series healthy subjects daytime records patients with chf data base 10 healthy subjects 7 females 3 males 20 50 average age 34.3 years 12 subjects with chf 3 females 9 males 22 71 average age 60.8 years drift diffusion coefficients @xmath44 @xmath45 displayed figures 3 4 drift coefficient @xmath44 linear function @xmath22 diffusivity @xmath45 quadratic in @xmath22 estimates coefficients less accurate for large values @xmath22 uncertainties increasedata set healthy subjects , = 9truecm = @xmath46 patients with chf obtain , @xmath47 computed average coefficients @xmath44 @xmath45 healthy subjects with chf pawulas theorem,@xmath48 km expansion truncated after second term fourth - order coefficient @xmath49 vanishes data coefficient @xmath50 about @xmath51 healthy subjects @xmath52 with chf equations ( 5 ) ( 6 ) drift coefficients healthy subjects chf same order magnitude diffusion coefficients @xmath36 @xmath22 different one order magnitude distinguishing two classes subjects @xmath36-dependence diffusion coefficient healthy subjects stronger than with chf numerical coefficients @xmath53 larger for healthy subjects shown figures 3 and 4 strong @xmath54dependence diffusion coefficient @xmath45 healthy subjects indicates nature pdf increments @xmath22 @xmath36 @xmath25 intermittent shape change with @xmath36 subjects with chf pdf not sensitive to change time scale @xmath36 increments fluctuations not intermittentresults compatible with recent discoveries interbeat fluctuations for healthy and with chf have fractal and multifractal properties shown probability density of interbeat interval increments satisfies fokker - planck equation encodes markovian nature of increments fluctuations first two kramers - moyal coefficients for stochastic processes drift and diffusion coefficients fp using polynomial ansatz obtain simple expressions in time scale shown drift and diffusion coefficients of interbeat fluctuations of healthy and patients with chf have different behavior analyzed by method help distinguish two groups obtain form path probability functional of increments intervals in time scale encodes scale dependence of probability density provides physical picture of intermittent nature of interbeat intervals fluctuations previous analysis of data indicated long - range correlations characterized by self - affine fractal distributions fractional brownian motion stochastic processes method distinguishes healthy subjects from with chf in type of correlationsif data follow fractional brownian motion hurst exponent @xmath55 two classes subjects @xmath56 @xmath57 indicates negative correlations @xmath58 indicates increments follow brownian motion method proposed present paper different increments analyzed markov processes not contradiction with previous analyses analysis correlations increments correlations decay distinguish healthy subjects from with chf differences between drift and diffusion coefficients of fokker - plank equation incremental data provides clearer physical way understanding differences between groups previous lipsitz j. mietus moody a.l goldberger , circulation _ * 81 * , 1803 ( 1990 ) ; kaplan et al . biophys . j. * 59 * , 945 ( 1991 ) ; n iyengar et al . j. physiol . * 271 * , r1078 ( 1996 ) peng buldyrev s havlin simons stanley a.l goldberger , phys . e * 49 * 1685 ( 1994 ) ; peng hausdorff.lgoldberger nonlinear dynamics self organization biomedicine edited walleczek cambridge university press 1999
| 0.501909
| 2,728
| 1,369
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,605
|
we present a new few - parameter phenomenological model of light curves of eclipsing binaries and stars with transiting planets that is able to fit the observed light curves with the accuracy better than 1% of their amplitudes .
the model can be used namely for appropriate descriptions of light curve shapes , classification , mid - eclipse time determination , and fine period analyses .
|
modern physical models of eclipsing binaries and transiting exoplanets ( eclipsing systems = es ) ( e.g. * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) are able to simulate their light curves with impressive fidelity .
however , a solution of the reverse problem , to derive all important parameters of the model from observational data , is seldom unique .
if we have observational data of moderate or poor quality , we are often forced to diminish the number of free parameters and thus use simplified ( and frequently physically inconsistent ) models . a decision which parameters to fix or leave floating is usually nontrivial . nevertheless , for several common practical tasks , such as : 1 ) determination of the mid - eclipse times , 2 ) light curve fitting , 3 ) description and classification of es light curve shapes for the purpose of the current and future surveys like asas or gaia , and 4 ) fine period analysis , we do not need to know the detailed physics of the system .
a good approximation of the shape of observed light curves is usually sufficient in such cases .
we present here a few - parameter general phenomenological model of eclipsing system light curves in the form of the special , analytic , periodic functions that are able to fit an overwhelming majority of the curves with an accuracy better than 1% . for the sake of simplicity
, we will limit our considerations only to systems with approximately circular orbits that represent more than 80% of observed eclipsing systems .
the model function of a monochromatic light curve ( expressed in magnitudes ) of eclipsing systems @xmath0 , can be assumed as the sum of three particular functions : @xmath1 where @xmath2 describes the mutual eclipses of the components , @xmath3 models the proximity effects , while @xmath4 approximates the oconnell effect ( irrespectively of its physical cause ) .
the normally occurring features of all eclipsing system light curves are two more or less symmetrical depressions caused by mutual eclipses of gravitationally bound stellar or planetary components
. the model function of eclipses @xmath5 can be approximated by the sum of two symmetrical analytic functions of the phase @xmath6 .
we assume that the primary eclipse is centered at the phase @xmath7 , while the secondary eclipse ( if one is present ) is centered at phase @xmath8 , @xmath9}{\left\{1\!-\!{\left\{1\!-\!\exp{\left[1\!-\ ! \cosh{\left(\frac{\varphi_k}{d_k}\right)}\right]}\right\}}^{\mathit{\gamma}_{\!k}}\right\}};\\ & \varphi_k={\left[\varphi-(k-1)/2\right ] } - \mathrm{round}{\left[\varphi-(k-1)/2\right]},\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the summation is over the number of eclipses , @xmath10 : @xmath11 or @xmath12 ( the common situation for exoplanet transits ) , @xmath13 are the auxiliary phases defined in the interval @xmath14 , @xmath15 are the central depths of eclipses in mag , @xmath16 is the parameter expressing half - widths of eclipses , @xmath17 are the correcting parameters , @xmath18 parameterize the kurtosis of individual eclipses .
the fit of a transit of the exoplanet tres2b ( @xmath12 ) observed by _ kepler _
( see fig.[fig1 ] ) @xcite utilizes five parameters : @xmath19 .
however , the full description of the model monochromatic light curves with two eclipses ( @xmath11 ) would generally require nine free parameters : @xmath20 , and @xmath21 .
nevertheless , the most common situations would permit a reduction to 5 parameters , @xmath22 , because it is usually acceptable to assume that @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 . a detailed discussion of the properties of the eclipse model function @xmath5 and its possible simplifications are given in @xcite .
light variations of eclipsing binaries caused by eclipses are usually modified by proximity and oconnell effects that may be modelled by a sum of cosine and sine harmonic polynomials : @xmath27};\quad f_{\rm c}(\varphi)= \sum_{k = n_{\mathrm p}+n_{\mathrm e}+1}^{n_{\mathrm c}+ n_{\mathrm p}+n_{\mathrm e } } a_k\,\sin(2\,\pi\,\varphi),\ ] ] where @xmath28 , @xmath29 is the number of terms in @xmath30 : @xmath31 , @xmath32 if the oconnell asymmetry is not present then @xmath33 , else @xmath34 ( for more information see * ? ? ? * ) . the uncommon @xmath35 light curve of eclipsing binary v477lyr ( see fig.[477lyr ] ) is determined by 8 parameters : @xmath36 , @xmath37 .
the parameters of the above defined model functions , especially the amplitudes @xmath38 , and parameters @xmath39 , @xmath40 and @xmath41 are generally wavelength dependent .
it follows both from the theory and experience that most of the wavelength dependencies can be well approximated by the low order polynomials of the quantity @xmath42 ; @xmath43 , where @xmath44 is the effective wavelength of corresponding passband , @xmath45 is an arbitrarily selected central wavelength of the data set . then : @xmath46 where @xmath47 , @xmath48 or @xmath49 , are the numbers of degrees of freedom of the corresponding parameters of the model .
the standard set of the monochromatic light curve model parameters of eclipsing binaries ( see sec.[monoch ] ) : @xmath50 can be considered as the special case of the multicolour decomposition eq.[multi ] : @xmath51 .
all needed parameters and their uncertainties can be determined using the standard non - linear weighted least square technique ( see in * ? ? ?
the outlined phenomenological modeling of eclipse - binary and planetary - transit light curves has an advantage of high efficiency and simplicity and thus can be used for a wide range of applications .
|
modern models of eclipsing binaries transiting exoplanets ( systems * ? ? simulate light curves with fidelity solution of reverse problem to derive important parameters from observational data seldom unique if observational data moderate or poor quality forced to diminish free parameters use simplified inconsistent models decision which parameters to fix or leave floating nontrivial for common tasks determination mid - eclipse times light curve fitting description classification of es light curve shapes for fine period analysis need to know detailed physics system good approximation of shape of observed light curves sufficient present few - parameter phenomenological model of eclipsing system light curves form of special analytic periodic functions fit majority of curves with accuracy better than 1% limit considerations to systems with circular orbits more than 80% of observed eclipsing systems model function of monochromatic light curve of eclipsing systems @xmath0 assumed as sum of three functions : @xmath1 describes mutual eclipses of @xmath3 models proximity effects @xmath4 approximates oconnell effecteclipsing system light curves are two symmetrical depressions caused by mutual eclipses of stellar or planetary components model function of eclipses @xmath5 approximated by sum of two analytic functions of phase @xmath6 primary eclipse centered at phase @xmath7 secondary eclipse at phase @xmath8 @xmath9_k summation is over number of eclipses @xmath10 @xmath11 or @xmath12 for exoplanet transits @xmath13 are auxiliary phases @xmath14 @xmath15 are central depths of eclipses in @xmath16 half - widths of eclipses @xmath17 correcting parameters @xmath18 kurtosis of eclipses transit of exoplanet tres2b ( @xmath12 ) observed by kepler fig @xcite utilizes five parameters : @xmath19full description monochromatic light curves with two eclipses @xmath11 nine parameters : @xmath20 common situations permit reduction to 5 parameters @xmath22 @xmath23 detailed discussion eclipse model function @xmath5 simplifications in @xcite light variations of eclipsing binaries modified by proximity oconnell effects modelled by cosine sine harmonic polynomials : @xmath27}; f_{\rm c}\varphi=\sum_{k = n_\mathrm p}+n\mathrm e}+1 p @xmath28 @xmath29 number of terms in @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 if oconnell asymmetry not present @xmath33 else @xmath34 uncommon @xmath35 light curve of eclipsing binary v477lyr determined by 8 parameters : @xmath36 @xmath37 parameters model functions amplitudes @xmath38 @xmath39 wavelength dependenttheory experience wavelength dependencies approximated by low order polynomials quantity @xmath42 ; @xmath43 @xmath44 effective wavelength passband @xmath45 selected central wavelength data set @xmath46 @xmath47 are degrees freedom of parameters model standard set monochromatic light curve model parameters eclipsing binaries @xmath50 special case of multicolour decomposition @xmath51 needed parameters uncertainties determined using standard non - linear weighted least square technique phenomenological modeling of eclipse - binary planetary - transit light curves high efficiency simplicity used for wide range applications
| 0.262984
| 1,397
| 676
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,611
|
we summarize the unique capabilities of uv coronagraphic spectroscopy for determining the detailed plasma properties ( e.g. , density , temperature , outflow speed , composition ) of the source regions of both transient phenomena such as cmes , flares , and solar energetic particles ( seps ) and more time - steady solar wind streams .
uvcs / soho observations have provided the first detailed diagnostics of the physical conditions of cme plasma in the extended corona .
it provided new insights into the roles of shock waves , reconnection , and magnetic helicity in cme eruptions .
we summarize past observations and discuss the diagnostic potential of uv coronagraphic spectroscopy for characterizing two possible sites of sep production : cme shocks and reconnection current sheets .
uvcs / soho has also led to fundamentally new views of the acceleration region of the solar wind .
understanding the physical processes in this region , which ranges from the low corona ( @xmath01.5 @xmath1 ) past the sonic points ( @xmath2 ) , is key to linking the results of solar imaging to _ in situ _ particle and field detection . despite the advances that have resulted from uvcs / soho , more advanced instrumentation could determine properties of additional ions with a wider sampling of charge / mass combinations .
this would provide much better constraints on the specific kinds of waves that are present as well as the specific collisionless damping modes .
electron temperatures and departures from maxwellian velocity distributions could also be measured .
the instrumentation capable of making the above observations will be described .
[ 2005/06/01 1.0 ( src ) ] to be published in the proceedings of _ solar wind 11/soho16 : connecting sun and heliosphere , _
june 1317 , 2005 , whistler , canada , esa sp592 .
|
in the following , we describe the capabilities of ultraviolet coronagraphic spectroscopy to address the sep / flare / cme and solar wind problems , and we provide a brief description of a science payload that is capable of carrying out the required observations .
uvcs / soho observations have provided new insights into the roles of shock waves , reconnection , and magnetic helicity in cme eruptions ( raymond 2002 ) .
the key parameters in theories of particle acceleration by shocks are the pre - shock plasma conditions ( including seed particle population ) , the shock speed , and the angle between the magnetic field and the shock motion .
uvcs has observed cme - driven shocks through their effect on the widths of uv spectral lines ( raymond et al .
2000 ; mancuso et al .
these observations provide information about the compression ratio in the shock , a crucial parameter for predicting sep spectra , and information about the thermal equilibration among electrons , protons and heavier ions .
electron heating is relatively modest , and the line widths of oxygen and silicon ions imply temperatures far higher than the proton temperatures , a potentially important consideration for models of sep composition . in some events , the shock compression ratio can be determined from type ii burst band splitting ( e.g. , vrnak et al .
2002 ) , but not all radio bursts contain enough detail for this diagnostic to be useful . for a much larger fraction of events , uv spectroscopy can be used to determine the compression ratio via two independent techniques : ( 1 ) measuring pre- to post - shock temperature ratios ( i.e. , both @xmath3 and @xmath4 ) with resonant and thomson - scattered h i ly@xmath5 line widths , then using adiabatic theory to compute the density ratio ; ( 2 ) measuring ion temperatures of several species having different charges and masses and applying collisionless theories of multi - ion shock heating ( e.g. , lee et al .
1987 ; lee & wu 2000 ) to compute the compression ratio that is most consistent with the observations ( for both methods , see mancuso et al .
2002 ) .
uvcs routinely obtains the densities , ionization states and elemental abundances in the pre - cme corona ( e.g. , raymond et al .
the densities obtained by uvcs can be combined with type ii radio burst drift rates to obtain shock speeds .
upper limits on the coronal alfvn speed above active regions were inferred from the derived shock speeds by requiring that the disturbances propagate at least as fast as the local characteristic speed ( mancuso et al .
2003 ) . for a subset of events , the resulting shock speeds are in much better agreement with lasco cme expansion rates than shock speeds based upon average coronal density profiles , although there are some uncertainties in the measured drift rates ( mancuso & raymond 2004 ) .
the alfvn and shock speeds can be inferred from detection of the shock arrival at different heights as determined by the timing of the increase in line widths of uv emission lines ( e.g. , ciaravella et al .
the angle between the shock front and the magnetic field requires the pre - shock field direction , which can be determined from streamer morphology .
severe elemental depletions are often observed in the closed field portions of streamers ( uzzo et al .
2004 ) , providing an additional indicator of field topology .
another parameter potentially vital to the efficiency of shock acceleration is the density of suprathermal seed particles ( e.g. , desai et al .
while uvcs was not able to detect such particles , the improved sensitivity and instrumental profile characterization of next - generation instruments will make it possible to determine suprathermal particle densities out to @xmath66 times the mean proton thermal speed ( cranmer 1998 ) .
although uvcs has proven the feasibility of detecting and characterizing cme shocks for several representative events , next - generation instrumentation can provide more extensive diagnostics and more complete spatial and temporal coverage .
the empirical characterization of the coronal shock conditions and the ambient solar wind properties can then be used as inputs to : ( 1 ) 3d mhd models of the shock propagation through the heliosphere , and ( 2 ) multi - scale models of the sep acceleration , transport , and energy spectrum synthesis ( zank et al .
2000 ; li et al . 2003 ; rice et al .
such constraints need to be applied in order to model specific events , such as the massive solar storms of oct
sep acceleration and transport models can be tested for specific events by using spectroscopy and other remote - sensing diagnostics to constrain the initial parameters of the shock in the corona , then comparing with observed sep energy spectra from , e.g. , the inner heliospheric sentinels .
iterative testing and refinement will ultimately result in a comprehensive validation of a predictive sep model .
models of cmes rely heavily on reconnection in current sheets , either trailing beneath the ejected magnetic flux rope or creating the flux rope in the first place ( see klimchuk 2001 ) .
reconnection dumps large amounts of energy in the lower atmosphere of the sun , creating intense heating , which accounts for the traditional flare ribbons and loops and for the current sheet containing hot plasma ( forbes et al .
1989 ; vestka & cliver 1992 ; forbes & acton 1996 ; priest & forbes 2002 ) .
uvcs observations made it possible for the first time to allow us to carry out diagnostics of the plasma inside the current sheet ( ciaravella et al .
2000 ; ko et al . 2003 ) .
a narrow feature was seen in [ fe xviii ] emission in the space between the post - flare loops and the cme core , indicating electron temperatures near @xmath7 k. significant progress in studying the current sheet and the process of magnetic reconnection in the current sheet was made recently when the uv spectral data of the plasma inside the current sheet during two events on january 8 , 2002 and on november 18 , 2003 were obtained and analyzed ( ko et al .
2003 ; lin et al .
both events developed a fast cme , a growing flare loop system , and a long current sheet that connects cme and flare loops .
in one of these events , the pattern of the reconnection inflow near the current sheet was well recorded in h i ly@xmath5
. this allowed us to deduce the speed of the reconnection inflow directly and even to estimate the thickness of the current sheet . also , it is possible to determine the magnetic field strength by using the observed speeds , densities , and temperatures to compute the kinetic and thermal energy densities in the reconnection region , then assume that this energy comes from the annihilation of an equal amount of magnetic energy just outside the current sheet ( ko et al .
all of the parameters described above are required in order to put empirical constraints on the _ reconnection rate _ and electric field strength in the current sheet .
such progress has very important theoretical consequences : for example , we are able to deduce the electrical resistivity ( conductivity ) in the current sheet , or in the reconnection region .
results obtained from uvcs and other remote - sensing instruments can provide the value of the electrical conductivity of the plasma inside the current sheet in an ongoing eruption for the first time since the impetus of applying reconnection theory to solar eruptions began six decades ago ( giovanelli 1946 ; and also see priest & forbes 2000 ) . with the knowledge of the dynamical process inside the current sheet , we are further able to investigate the particle acceleration taking place in the current sheet
. a strong electric field is induced by magnetic reconnection in the current sheet .
for a typical event , the electric field strength reaches about 5 v / cm ( e.g. , wang et al . 2003 ; qiu et al .
2004 for observations , and martens & kuin 1989 ; forbes & lin 2000 ; lin 2002 for theories ) .
an extremely high value of 50 v / cm was also reported ( xu et al .
2004 ) . in principle , such a strong electric field is able to accelerate any charged particles .
the current sheet is an assembly of waves and electric field , and accelerations can occur in various ways ( see also miller & roberts 1995 ; litvinenko 2000 ) .
we do not yet know exactly what happens in a real eruptive process , but the observations that a series of bright blobs flow successively out of the current sheet ( e.g. , ko et al .
2003 ; lin et al . 2005 ) replicate one of the main characteristics of magnetic reconnection inside the turbulent current sheet : the turbulent eddies or small magnetic islands inside the current sheet tend to merge into bigger ones before they leave the current sheet ( ambrosiano et al .
1988 ) .
further progress in understanding the above processes occurring in the current sheet depends on the accurate measurement of the thickness of the current sheet , plasma parameters in the current sheet ( including electron and ion velocity distributions and densities ) , the speeds of reconnection inflow / outflow near the current sheet , as well as electric and magnetic fields in and around the current sheet .
uv coronagraphic spectroscopy is uniquely suited to these requirements .
uvcs has led to fundamentally new views of the _ acceleration region _ of the solar wind . by measuring emission lines
formed both by collisional excitation and by the resonant scattering of solar - disk photons , uv spectroscopy provides a multi - faceted characterization of the kinetic properties of atoms , ions , and electrons ( e.g. , withbroe et al . 1982 ; cranmer 2002a ) .
the doppler - broadened shapes of emission lines are direct probes of line - of - sight ( los ) particle velocity distributions ( i.e. , essentially providing @xmath8 when the off - limb magnetic field is @xmath6radial ) , and red / blue doppler shifts reveal bulk flows along the los .
integrated intensities of resonantly scattered lines can be used to constrain the solar wind velocity and other details about the velocity distribution in the radial direction ( e.g. , @xmath9 and @xmath10 ) ; this is the so - called `` doppler dimming / pumping '' diagnostic ( e.g. , noci et al .
intensities of collisionally dominated lines especially when combined into an emission measure distribution can constrain electron temperatures , densities , and elemental abundances in the coronal plasma .
even departures from maxwellian and bi - maxwellian velocity distributions are detectable with spectroscopic measurements having sufficient sensitivity and spectral resolution ( e.g. , cranmer 2001 ) . in the high - speed solar wind , uvcs measured outflow speeds that were found to become supersonic much closer to the sun than previously believed . in coronal holes ,
heavy ions ( e.g. , o@xmath11 ) were found to flow faster , to be heated hundreds of times more strongly than protons and electrons , and to have anisotropic temperatures with @xmath12 ( kohl et al .
1997 , 1998 , 1999 ; cranmer et al .
these unexpected results have rekindled theoretical efforts to understand the heating and acceleration of the fast wind in the extended corona ( e.g. , tu & marsch 1997 ; leer et al .
1998 ; axford et al . 1999
; hollweg 1999 ; hollweg & isenberg 2002 ; marsch 2004 ) .
the slow solar wind was found to flow mostly along the outer edges of bright streamers , near locations with measured abundance patterns matching those of the _ in situ _ slow wind ( strachan et al .
2002 ; raymond et al .
1997 ) . the closed - field `` core '' regions of streamers , though , exhibit heavy element abundances only 3 to 30% of those seen at 1 au , indicating gravitational settling ( e.g. , raymond 1999 ; vsquez & raymond 2005 ) .
uvcs observed the transition from a high - density collision - dominated plasma at low heights in streamers to a low - density collisionless plasma at large heights , the latter exhibiting high ion temperatures and anisotropies that suggest similar physics as in the fast wind ( ko et al .
2002 ; frazin et al .
2003 ) . if the kinetic properties of _ additional ions _ were to be measured in the extended corona ( i.e. , a wider sampling of charge / mass combinations ) we could much better constrain the specific kinds of waves that are present as well as the specific collisionless damping modes ( e.g. , cranmer 2002b ) .
measuring the _ electron temperature _ above @xmath61.5 @xmath1 ( never done directly before ) would finally allow us to determine the bulk - plasma heating rate in different solar wind structures , thus putting the firmest ever constraints on models of why the slow [ fast ] speed wind is slow [ fast ] ( e.g. , suess et al . 1999 ; endeve et al . 2004 ; cranmer , these proceedings ) . measuring _
non - maxwellian velocity distributions _ of electrons and positive ions would allow us to test specific models of mhd turbulence , cyclotron resonance , and velocity filtration .
new capabilities such as these would be enabled by greater photon sensitivity , an expanded wavelength range , and the use of measurements that heretofore have only been utilized in a testing capacity ( e.g. , thomson - scattered h i ly@xmath5 to obtain @xmath4 ; the hanle effect to obtain constraints on the magnetic field ) .
these would then allow the relative contributions of different physical processes to the heating and acceleration of all solar wind plasma components to be determined directly .
a mission capable of carrying out the required observations would include two instrument units : a large - aperture ultraviolet coronagraph spectrometer ( see fig . 1 ) and a large - aperture visible light coronagraph .
a suitable design was developed during a midex feasibility study for a mission called asce .
remote external occulters supported by a deployable boom provide much larger unvignetted apertures than are possible with conventional coronagraphs .
these instruments provide major improvements in sensitivity , stray light rejection , spatial resolution , minimum observable height and ultraviolet wavelength range .
new spectroscopic diagnostics for the electron velocity distribution , magnetic field , and parameters for a broad range of newly observable ions are implemented by these instruments .
unprecedented cadences are possible .
|
describe capabilities ultraviolet coronagraphic spectroscopy sep / flare / cme solar wind problems description of science payload required observations uvcs / soho observations insights into shock waves reconnection magnetic helicity in cme eruptions raymond 2002 key parameters in particle acceleration by shocks are pre - shock plasma conditions shock speed angle between magnetic field shock motion uvcs observed cme - driven shocks effect uv spectral lines raymond 2000 mancuso observations provide information about compression ratio in shock predicting sep spectra thermal equilibration among electrons protons heavier ions electron heating modest line widths of oxygen silicon ions imply temperatures higher than proton temperatures important consideration for models sep composition shock compression ratio determined from type ii burst band splitting not all radio bursts detail fraction uv spectroscopy determine compression ratio via two techniques measuring pre- to post - shock temperature ratios using adiabatic theory compute density ratio measuring ion temperatures of species different charges applying collisionless theories of multi - ion shock heating1987 lee wu 2000 compute compression ratio consistent with observations mancuso et al . 2002 uvcs obtains densities ionization states elemental abundances pre - cme corona densities combined with type ii radio burst drift rates shock speeds upper limits coronal alfvn speed above active regions inferred from shock speeds disturbances propagate fast local characteristic speed mancuso 2003 resulting shock speeds with lasco cme expansion rates than average coronal density profiles uncertainties in measured drift rates 2004 alfvn shock speeds inferred from detection shock arrival different heights timing line widths uv emission lines angle between shock front magnetic field requires pre - shock field direction determined streamer morphology severe elemental depletions observed in closed field portions streamers uzzo 2004 indicator field topology vital shock acceleration density of suprathermal seed particles uvcs detect improved sensitivity characterization next - generation instruments determine suprathermal particle densities times mean proton thermal speed cranmer 1998 )uvcs proven detecting characterizing cme shocks next - generation instrumentation extensive diagnostics complete spatial temporal coverage empirical characterization coronal shock conditions ambient solar wind properties inputs to 3d mhd models shock propagation multi - scale models sep acceleration transport energy spectrum synthesis zank 2000 li 2003 rice constraints need model specific events massive solar storms sep acceleration transport models tested for spectroscopy remote - sensing diagnostics initial parameters shock corona with observed sep energy spectra from inner heliospheric sentinels iterative testing refinement in comprehensive validation of predictive sep model models of cmes rely on reconnection in current sheets magnetic flux klimchuk 2001 reconnection dumps energy in lower atmosphere sun creating intense heating accounts for traditional flare ribbons loops current sheet containing hot plasma forbes 1989 1992 2002 uvcs observations diagnostics of plasma inside current sheet ( ciaravella 2000 ko 2003 narrow feature seen in [ fe xviii ] emission between post - flare loops cme core indicating electron temperatures near @xmath7 k.progress studying current sheet magnetic reconnection recently uv spectral data plasma during events january 8 2002 november 18 2003 obtained analyzed ( ko et al . 2003 ; lin et al . events developed fast cme growing flare loop system long current sheet cme flare loops pattern reconnection inflow near current sheet recorded in h i ly@xmath5 deduce speed estimate thickness determine magnetic field strength using observed speeds densities temperatures compute kinetic thermal energy densities in reconnection region assume energy from annihilation equal magnetic energy outside current sheet ko et al . parameters required empirical constraints on reconnection rate electric field strength in current sheet progress theoretical consequences deduce electrical resistivity in current sheet reconnection region results from uvcs remote - sensing instruments value electrical conductivity plasma eruption since theory six decades ago ( giovanelli 1946 ; priest & forbes 2000 ) knowledge dynamical process current sheet investigate particle acceleration strong electric field induced by magnetic reconnection typical event electric field strength reaches about 5 v / cm ( wang et al . 2003 ; qiu et al .2004 observations martens & kuin 1989 forbes & lin 2000 lin 2002 theories high value 50 v / cm reported xu et al . 2004 ) strong electric field charged particles current sheet waves electric field accelerations occur miller & roberts 1995 litvinenko 2000 real eruptive process observations bright blobs flow out of current sheet ko et al . 2003 ; lin et al . 2005 replicate magnetic reconnection turbulent current sheet eddies magnetic merge into bigger ones before ambrosiano et al . 1988 ) progress understanding processes depends on accurate measurement thickness plasma parameters electron ion velocity distributions densities speeds reconnection inflow outflow electric magnetic fields uv coronagraphic spectroscopy suited requirements led new views acceleration region solar wind measuring emission lines collisional excitation resonant scattering solar - disk photons provides multi - faceted characterization kinetic properties of atoms ions electrons withbroe et al . 1982 ; cranmer 2002a doppler - broadened shapes emission lines probes line - - sight particle velocity distributionsproviding @xmath8 off - limb magnetic field @xmath6radial red / blue doppler shifts reveal bulk flows intensities scattered lines constrain solar wind velocity velocity distribution radial direction @xmath9 @xmath10 doppler dimming / pumping diagnostic noci intensities collisionally dominated lines emission constrain electron temperatures densities elemental abundances coronal plasma departures from maxwellian bi - maxwellian velocity distributions detectable with spectroscopic measurements cranmer 2001 high - speed solar wind measured outflow speeds supersonic closer to sun coronal holes heavy ions o@xmath11 flow faster heated more strongly than protons electrons anisotropic temperatures with @xmath12 kohl et 1997 1998 1999 cranmer results rekindled theoretical efforts understand heating acceleration fast wind extended corona tu marsch 1997 leer axford 1999 hollweg 2002 marsch 2004 slow solar wind along outer edges of bright streamers near locations abundance patterns slow wind strachan et 2002 raymond et al 1997closed - field core regions of streamers exhibit heavy element abundances 3 to 30% at 1 au indicating gravitational settling raymond 1999 vsquez raymond 2005 observed transition from high - density collision - dominated plasma at low heights to low - density collisionless plasma at large heights high ion temperatures anisotropies similar fast wind ko et 2002 frazin 2003 kinetic properties of additional ions measured in extended corona constrain specific waves collisionless damping modes cranmer 2002b measuring electron temperature above @xmath61.5 @xmath1 determine bulk - plasma heating rate in solar wind structures constraints on models slow wind suess et al 1999 endeve et 2004 cranmer measuring non - maxwellian velocity distributions of electrons positive ions test models mhd turbulence cyclotron resonance velocity filtration new capabilities enabled by greater photon sensitivity expanded wavelength range use of measurements testing thomson - scattered h ly@xmath5 hanle effect constraints on magnetic fieldcontributions heating acceleration solar wind plasma components mission two units large - aperture ultraviolet coronagraph spectrometer large - visible light coronagraph design developed midex feasibility study mission asce remote occulters deployable boom provide larger unvignetted apertures conventional coronagraphs instruments provide improvements sensitivity stray light rejection spatial resolution minimum observable height ultraviolet wavelength range new spectroscopic diagnostics electron velocity distribution magnetic field parameters newly observable ions implemented unprecedented cadences possible
| 0.508959
| 3,129
| 1,543
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,617
|
by using the most recent determinations of the several theoretical and experimental input parameters , we update the unitarity triangle analysis in the standard model and discuss the sensitivity to new physics effects .
we investigate the interest of measuring with a better precision the various physical quantities entering the unitarity triangle analysis and study in a model independent way whether , despite the undoubted success of the ckm mechanism in the standard model , the unitarity triangle analysis still allows the presence of new physics .
|
the analysis of the unitarity triangle ( ut ) and cp violation represents one of the most stringent tests of the standard model ( sm ) and , for this reason , also an interesting window on new physics ( np ) . the input of this analysis is a large number of both experimental and theoretical parameters , the most relevant of which are listed in table [ tab : inputs ] . [
cols="^,^,^,^,^ " , ] to the angle @xmath0 can be also extracted , in principle , from the measurements of two - body charmless hadronic b decays .
a lot of theoretical investigations have been recently made for these decay channels .
in particular , important progress has been made with the calculation of the amplitudes in the heavy quark limit using the factorization approach @xcite , though there is still some controversy on the importance of non - leading corrections @xcite . from the experimental point of view
an impressive effort has been made to measure as many branching fractions and cp asymmetries as possible ( for a collection of results see @xcite ) .
it would be very interesting in the near future to compare the determination of the angle @xmath0 from the ut analysis and from two - body decays measurements . in the future , at the lhc / btev experiments , @xmath0 will be cleanly measured in the tree - level @xmath1 decays .
the plot in figure [ fig : pull_gamma ] shows the compatibility of the indirect determination of @xmath0 with a future determination of the same angle obtained from b decays .
it can be noted that even in case the angle @xmath0 can be measured with a precision of 10@xmath2 from b decays , the predicted 3@xmath3 region is still rather large , corresponding to the interval [ 25 - 100]@xmath2 . if all the theoretical errors are divided by a factor of two , as indicated by the darker curve , the predicted 3@xmath3 region will be consistently reduced .
although the ckm mechanism is extremely successful , leading in particular to the precise prediction of the value of sin2@xmath4 , it is nevertheless worth to investigate whether the analysis of the ut still allows some room for np effects .
this is the issue we would like to address in this section .
the physical processes entering the analysis and the related physical observables determined from the experiments , are listed in table [ tab : schema ] . barring the possibility of significant np effects in the determination of the ratio @xmath5 from tree - level processes
, we have explored the possible contributions to @xmath6 mixing ( @xmath7 ) and @xmath8 mixing .
np contributions introduce in general a large number of new parameters : flavour changing couplings , short distance coefficients and matrix elements of new local operators . the specific list and
the actual values of these parameters depend on the details of the np model . nevertheless ,
each of the mixing process listed in table [ tab : schema ] , being described by a single amplitude , can be effectively parameterized in a completely general way in terms of only two new parameters , which we choose to quantify the difference of the amplitude in absolute value and phase with respect to the sm one @xcite .
thus , for instance , in the case of @xmath6 mixings we define @xmath9 where @xmath10 includes only the sm box diagrams , while @xmath11 includes also the np contributions . by definition , in the absence of np effects , @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
the experimental quantities determined from the @xmath6 mixings and listed in table [ tab : schema ] are related to their sm counterparts and the np parameters by the following relations : @xmath14 and @xmath15 as far as the @xmath8 mixing is concerned , we find it convenient to introduce a single parameter which relates the imaginary part of the amplitude to the sm one @xmath16 } { { \rm im}[\langle k^0|h_{eff}^{sm}|\bar{k}^0\rangle]}\ , .
\label{eq : ceps}\ ] ] this definition implies in fact a simple relation for @xmath17 , @xmath18 thus , all np effects which may enter the present analysis of the ut are parameterized in terms of four real coefficients , @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22 . due to
the limited available number of constraints , we now make the hypothesis that np effects can appear ( at least to a large extent ) only in one of the three mixing amplitudes .
this is the only restrictive assumption we make in this analysis . clearly , this hypothesis is not valid in several specific models , as for instance in the minimal flavour violating susy models @xcite in which np effects simultaneously appear in all the mixing amplitudes but with coefficients which are related one to the other .
the result from the fit is : @xmath23~ \rm{at}~95\% ~c.l .
\label{eq : cepsk}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the value is compatible with unity but the distribution is rather broad .
thus , in this respect , large np contributions to @xmath8 mixing are still allowed .
we note , however , that the experimental constraint coming from @xmath17 can only determine the product @xmath24 .
therefore , the large width of the distribution of @xmath22 simply reflects the uncertainty existing on the hadronic parameter @xmath25 .
we also find that , in this scenario , the distributions of the other ut parameters ( @xmath26 , @xmath27 , sin2@xmath4 , @xmath28 ) are not really different from those obtained using the sm parameterization ( @xmath29 ) . the value of @xmath30 peaks at 1 .
however , it is not limited from above due to the fact the @xmath32 is not yet determined . also in this case ,
the distributions of the other ut parameters are not really different from those obtained using the sm parameterization ( @xmath33 ) .
finally we explore the possibility of np contributions in @xmath34 mixing .
figure [ fig : cd ] shows the distributions of @xmath35 and @xmath20 . is determined from the measurement of @xmath36 up to a discrete ambiguity , @xmath37 . in figure
[ fig : cd ] only one of the two determinations ( the one containing @xmath38 ) is shown for clarity . ]
we see that two solutions are possible in this case .
the first one peaks around the sm solution , @xmath39 and @xmath40 .
the second one represents instead the possibility of a really distinct np contribution .
the presence of two solutions corresponds to the fact that , as shown in figure [ fig : cd2 ] , the constraint from @xmath17 intercepts the circle defined by @xmath41 in two regions .
the region on the quadrant with positive value of @xmath42 corresponds to the sm solution .
the presence of these two solutions is also visible in several distributions of the ut parameters shown in figure [ fig:1d_angle_cd ] .
as can be seen from these plots , in order to discriminate between the two solutions , an independent determination of either @xmath26 , as obtained for instance from the study of the ratio @xmath43 of radiative @xmath44 decays , or @xmath0 would be necessary . the np solution has been also recently discussed in the literature @xcite .
we want to conclude this discussion with a comment concerning the naturalness " of this np solution " .
first , we observe that np , though possible , is certainly not required in order to explain the results of the ut analysis . in addition , suppose that the np solution in @xmath34 mixing is indeed the correct one .
then it is somewhat surprising to find that in the sm , i.e. in the
wrong " theory of @xmath34 mixing , the predicted values of @xmath45 and sin2@xmath4 actually select in the ( @xmath26 , @xmath27 ) plane just one of the two regions which are also allowed by the other constraints , namely @xmath46 and @xmath17 . in this sense
, the consistency of this np solution would be accidental .
y. grossman and m. p. worah , phys .
b * 395 * ( 1997 ) 241 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9612269 ] .
+ m. ciuchini _ et al .
_ , phys .
* 79 * ( 1997 ) 978 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9704274 ] .
d. london and a. soni , phys .
b * 407 * ( 1997 ) 61 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9704277 ] .
+ y. grossman , g. isidori and m. p. worah , phys .
d * 58 * ( 1998 ) 057504 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9708305 ] .
b. aubert _ et al .
_ [ babar collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0207070
. + k. abe _ et al . _ [ belle collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0207098 .
m. beneke , g. buchalla , m. neubert and c. t. sachrajda , phys .
* 83 * ( 1999 ) 1914 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9905312 ] ; nucl .
b * 591 * ( 2000 ) 313 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0006124 ] ; nucl .
b * 606 * ( 2001 ) 245 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0104110 ] .
m. ciuchini _ et al .
_ , aip conf .
* 602 * ( 2001 ) 180 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0110022 ] ; phys . lett .
b * 515 * ( 2001 ) 33 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0104126 ] .
a. stocchi , nucl .
* 117 * ( 2003 ) 145 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0211245 ] .
j. m. soares and l. wolfenstein , phys .
d * 47 * ( 1993 ) 1021 .
+ n. g. deshpande , b. dutta and s. oh , phys . rev .
* 77 * ( 1996 ) 4499 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9608231 ] .
+ j. p. silva and l. wolfenstein , phys .
d * 55 * ( 1997 ) 5331 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9610208 ] .
+ a. g. cohen _ et al .
_ , phys .
* 78 * ( 1997 ) 2300 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9610252 ] .
+ y. grossman , y. nir and m. p. worah , phys .
b * 407 * ( 1997 ) 307 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9704287 ] .
m. ciuchini _ et al .
_ , nucl . phys .
b * 534 * ( 1998 ) 3 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9806308 ] .
+ a. j. buras _ et al .
_ , phys .
b * 500 * ( 2001 ) 161 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0007085 ] .
r. fleischer , g. isidori and j. matias , jhep * 0305 * ( 2003 ) 053 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0302229 ] .
+ g. isidori , arxiv : hep - ph/0307014 .
|
analysis of unitarity triangle ut cp violation represents stringent standard model sm interesting window on new physics np input analysis is experimental theoretical parameters relevant listed in table inputs angle @xmath0 extracted from measurements two - body charmless hadronic b decays theoretical investigations made for these decay channels progress with calculation amplitudes in heavy quark limit using factorization approach @xcite controversy on importance of non - leading corrections experimental effort to measure many branching fractions cp asymmetries results see @xcite interesting to compare determination angle @xmath0 from ut analysis two - body decays measurements future lhc / btev experiments @xmath0 measured in tree - level @xmath1 decays plot in figure shows compatibility of indirect determination of @xmath0 with future determination angle from b decays angle @xmath0 measured with precision of 10@xmath2 from b decays predicted 3@xmath3 region large corresponding to interval [ 25 - 100]@xmath2 if theoretical errors divided by factor two predicted 3@xmath3 region reducedckm mechanism successful precise prediction value sin2@xmath4 worth investigate analysis ut allows room for np effects issue address in this section physical processes entering analysis related physical observables determined experiments listed in table [ tab schema ] barring significant np effects in ratio @xmath5 from tree - level processes explored possible contributions to @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 mixing np contributions introduce new parameters : flavour changing couplings short distance coefficients matrix elements new local operators specific list values parameters depend on details np model mixing process described by single amplitude parameterized two new parameters quantify difference of amplitude in absolute value phase with sm one @xcite @xmath6 mixings define @xmath9 @xmath10 includes sm box diagrams @xmath11 includes np contributions absence of np effects @xmath12 @xmath13 experimental quantities from @xmath6 mixings listed in table related to sm counterparts np parameters by relations : @xmath14 and @xmath15 @xmath8 mixing introduce single parameter relates imaginary part of amplitude to sm one @xmath16\label{eq : ceps} definition implies simple relation for @xmath17 @xmath18 all np effects analysis parameterized four coefficients @xmath19 limited constraints hypothesis np effects appear only in one three mixing amplitudes only restrictive assumption in analysis hypothesis not valid in specific models minimal flavour violating susy models @xcite np effects appear in all mixing amplitudes with coefficients related result is : @xmath23~ \rm{at}~95\% ~c.l \label{eq : cepsk}\end{aligned} value compatible with unity distribution broad large np contributions to @xmath8 mixing allowed experimental constraint from @xmath17 determine product @xmath24 large width of distribution of @xmath22 reflects uncertainty on hadronic parameter @xmath25 distributions of other ut parameters ( @xmath26 @xmath27@xmath4 ) not different from sm parameterization ( @xmath29 ) value of @xmath30 peaks at 1 not limited due @xmath32 not yet determined distributions of other ut parameters not different from sm parameterization ( @xmath33 )explore possibility np contributions in @xmath34 mixing figure fig : cd ] shows distributions of @xmath35 and @xmath20 determined from measurement of @xmath36 up to ambiguity @xmath37 figure cd one two determinations containing @xmath38 ) shown for clarity two solutions possible first peaks around sm solution @xmath39 and @xmath40 second represents distinct np contribution presence two solutions corresponds to constraint from @xmath17 intercepts circle by @xmath41 in two regions region on quadrant with positive value of @xmath42 corresponds to sm solution presence two solutions visible in distributions ut parameters in figure fig:1d_angle_cd ] discriminate between two solutions independent determination of @xmath26 @xmath43 @xmath44 or @xmath0 necessary np solution discussed in literature conclude discussion comment concerning naturalness np solution np possible not required explain results ut analysis suppose np solution in @xmath34 mixing correct surprising to find in sm wrong theory @xmath34 mixing predicted values @xmath45@xmath4 select plane two regions allowed constraints @xmath46 @xmath17 consistency solution accidental y. grossman worah phys . 395 1997 ) 241 arxiv hep - ph/9612269 m. ciuchini phys 79 1997 ) 978 arxiv hep - ph/9704274 d. london a. soni phys 407 1997 ) 61 arxiv hep - ph/9704277 y. grossman g. isidori worah phys 58 1998 ) 057504 hep - ph/9708305 b aubert babar collaboration hep - ex/0207070 k. abe belle collaboration hep - ex/0207098 m. beneke buchalla. neubert sachrajda phys . 83 1999 ) 1914 arxiv hep - ph/9905312 nucl 591 2000 ) 313 hep - ph/0006124 606 2001 ) 245 hep - ph/0104110 m. ciuchini conf. 602 2001 ) 180 hep - ph/0110022 phys 515 2001 ) 33 arxiv hep - ph/0104126 a. stocchi nucl 117 2003 ) 145 hep - ph/0211245 soares l wolfenstein phys 47 1993 ) 1021 deshpande dutta s oh phys . 77 1996 ) 4499 hep - ph/9608231 j p. silva l wolfenstein phys 55 1997 ) 5331 hep - ph/9610208 a g cohen 78 1997 ) 2300 hep - ph/9610252 y. grossman y nir m p worah 407 1997 ) 307 hep - ph/9704287 m ciuchini phys . 534 1998 ) 3 hep - ph/9806308 a j. buras phys . 500 2001 ) 161 hep - ph/0007085 r fleischer g. isidori j. matias 0305 2003 ) 053 hep - ph/0302229 g isidori hep - ph/0307014
| 0.358145
| 2,629
| 1,349
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,618
|
the accurate calculation of the ( differential ) correlation energy is central to the quantum chemical description of bond - formation and bond - dissociation processes . in order to estimate the quality of single- and multi - reference approaches for this purpose , various diagnostic tools have been developed . in this work
, we elaborate on our previous observation [ _ j .
phys .
chem .
lett . _ * 3 * , 3129 ( 2012 ) ] that one- and two - orbital - based entanglement measures provide quantitative means for the assessment and classification of electron correlation effects among molecular orbitals .
the dissociation behavior of some prototypical diatomic molecules features all types of correlation effects relevant for chemical bonding .
we demonstrate that our entanglement analysis is convenient to dissect these electron correlation effects and to provide a conceptual understanding of bond - forming and bond - breaking processes from the point of view of quantum information theory .
* orbital entanglement + in bond - formation processes * katharina boguslawski@xmath0 , pawel tecmer@xmath0 , gergely barcza@xmath1 , rs legeza@xmath2 , and markus reiher@xmath3 + @xmath0eth zurich , laboratorium fr physikalische chemie , + wolfgang - pauli - strasse 10 , 8093 zurich , switzerland + @xmath1wigner research center for physics , strongly correlated systems + `` lendlet '' research group , h-1525 budapest , hungary +
|
the correlation energy is a central quantity in quantum chemistry .
it is usually defined as the error in the electronic energy calculated within the independent - particle model of hartree fock ( hf ) theory with respect to the exact solution of the electronic schrdinger equation @xcite , @xmath4 the exact electronic energy @xmath5 can be obtained from the full configuration interaction ( fci ) approach . although there exists no rigorous distinction between different types of electron correlation effects , the correlation energy is typically divided into three categories : _ dynamic _ , _ static _ and _ nondynamic _ @xcite . the dynamic correlation energy is considered to be responsible for keeping electrons apart and is attributed to a large number of configurations ( determinants ) with small absolute weights in the wave function expansion , while the nondynamic and static contributions involve only some determinants with large absolute weights which are necessary for an appropriate treatment of the quasi - degeneracy of orbitals @xcite . in particular , static electron correlation embraces a suitable combination of determinants to account for proper spin symmetries and their interactions , whereas nondynamic correlation is required to allow a molecule to separate correctly into its fragments @xcite . over the past decades
, a number of quantum chemical methods has been developed to accurately describe either dynamic or nondynamic / static correlation effects .
for instance , mller
plesset perturbation theory and single - reference coupled cluster ( cc ) theory @xcite are successful in capturing dynamic correlation effects in single - reference cases , while the complete active space self consistent field ( casscf ) approach @xcite is suitable to describe static correlation in multi - reference problems .
still , the neglect of one kind of correlation effects may lead to non - negligible errors , which led to the development of `` hybrid '' approaches , among which are the complete active space second - order perturbation theory ( caspt2 ) @xcite and the multi - reference cc ansatz @xcite , both with their own intrinsic limitations . _ a priori _ knowledge about the interplay of dynamic , nondynamic and static electron correlation effects is required to select an appropriate electron correlation method in order to obtain reliable results .
this issue becomes most severe when spectroscopic accuracy of , say , 0.01 ev for relative energies is desired .
the consideration of dynamic , static and nondynamic correlation effects on an equal footing still remains a challenge for quantum chemistry .
the quality of single- and multi - reference quantum chemical methods can be estimated by a number of diagnostic tools @xcite .
examples are the absolute or squared weights of the reference or principal configuration ( the @xmath6 coefficient ) obtained from a ci calculation @xcite and the euclidean norm of the @xmath7 amplitudes , which are denoted as @xmath8 @xcite and @xmath9 diagnostics @xcite in cc and perturbation theory , respectively . related
are the @xmath10 and @xmath11 measures based on single and double excitations in single - reference cc theory @xcite .
a conceptually different group of diagnostic measures is based on concepts from quantum information theory and exploits knowledge about the one - particle reduced density matrix in terms of natural occupation numbers @xcite , the two - particle reduced density matrix or its cumulant in terms of the frobenius norm @xcite , the weights from excited configurations of some wave function expansion , @xcite and the distribution of effectively unpaired electrons @xcite .
a complementary classification of electron correlation effects that exploits entanglement measures among molecular orbitals was recently proposed by us @xcite .
our analysis is based on the assessment of the entanglement among any pair of orbitals and the entanglement of one orbital with all other orbitals , respectively , as encoded in a fci - type wave function .
an in - depth study of iron nitrosyl complexes @xcite , featuring complicated electronic structures , showed that the static , nondynamic , and dynamic contributions to the correlation energy and , as a consequence , the single- and multi - reference nature of a quantum system , can be distinguished by examining the entanglement patterns of the orbitals .
our entanglement analysis comprises two entropic measures : ( i ) the single - orbital entropy@xcite , @xmath12 ( @xmath13 denotes the four different occupations of a spatial orbital ) which quantifies the entanglement between one particular orbital and the remaining set of orbitals contained in the active orbital space from the eigenvalues @xmath14 of the one - orbital reduced density matrix @xmath15 of a given orbital . and , ( ii ) the mutual information@xcite , @xmath16 which measures the entanglement of two orbitals @xmath17 and @xmath18 embedded in the environment of all other active - space orbitals .
@xmath19 is the two - orbital entropy between a pair @xmath20 of orbitals , which is calculated from the eigenvalue of the two - orbital reduced density matrix @xmath21 ( analogously to eq .
( [ eq : s1 ] ) , but with @xmath13 now enumerating the 16 possible no- , one- , and two - electron states defined on the pair of orbitals ) , and @xmath22 is the kronecker delta . the one- and two - orbital density matrices can be determined from a many - particle density matrix by tracing out all many - electron states defined on the active - space orbitals that complement those orbital @xmath17 ( and @xmath18 , respectively ) whose entanglement with the others shall be studied @xcite . the general occupation - number - vector expansion of the electronic wave function constructed from @xmath23 active - space orbitals @xmath24 denoting the occupation of orbital @xmath17 )
may be decomposed into states @xmath25 and @xmath26 defined on a system comprising the single or pair of orbitals , respectively , and into those of its environment defined on the remaining orbitals . if , for the system consisting of one orbital @xmath17 , we split the environment states @xmath27
( @xmath27 then being a composite index ) as @xmath28 and @xmath29 , we can write the total electronic state as @xmath30 for the case of the system consisting of two orbitals @xmath17 and @xmath18 , we may split the environment states @xmath27 as @xmath31 , @xmath32 , and @xmath33
. then , the total electronic state reads in this basis @xmath34 the one- and two - orbital density matrix operator can now be expressed as @xmath35 and @xmath36 respectively . from these operators
one may derive the one- and two - orbital density matrices , which are calculated from the expansion coefficients @xmath37 and @xmath38 , respectively .
the total quantum information embedded in a wave function can be calculated from the set of single - orbital entropies @xcite @xmath39 as found in ref . ,
large single - orbital entropies ( @xmath40 ) and large values for the mutual information @xmath41 indicate orbitals which are important for nondynamic correlation effects .
medium - sized single - orbital entropies ( @xmath42 ) together with moderately entangled orbitals ( medium values of @xmath41 ) and small single - orbital entropies ( @xmath43 ) accompanied by small values of @xmath41 can be attributed to static and dynamic correlation effects , respectively .
an advantage of our approach is that it reduces electron correlation effects encoded in a wave function ( optimized by any quantum chemical method ) to quantities defined for the orbital basis , which can then be easily compared to each other .
the aim of this paper is twofold .
first , it provides a computational prescription for the calculation of the entanglement measures introduced in refs . and exploited in ref . , which is given in section [ sec :
second , these entanglement measures are discussed in the context of bond - forming ( or equivalently , bond - breaking ) processes in section [ sec : bond ] ( section [ comput_det ] contains the computational details ) , where we demonstrate how the single - orbital entropy can be employed to monitor the cleavage of chemical bonds .
conceptual understanding of electronic structures in terms of entangled orbitals results and a pictorial representation of how many bonds ( single , double , triple , etc . ) are formed between two atoms emerges from the single - orbital entropy diagrams .
we focus on a benchmark set of small diatomic molecules , which constitute paradigms of both single- and multi - reference problems : the n@xmath44 , f@xmath44 and csh molecules .
the matrix representation of the one and two - orbital reduced density matrices @xmath15 and @xmath21 introduced above can be constructed from fermionic correlation functions @xcite or from generalized correlation functions@xcite . in the following , we present the formalism relying on the latter ones . for a spin-1/2 fermionic model , like the one under consideration here , single - electron basis states ( orbitals )
can be empty , occupied with an @xmath13-(spin - up ) or a @xmath45-(spin - down ) electron , or doubly occupied with two electrons of paired spin .
these states we denote as @xmath46* * -0.31 cm @xmath47 , @xmath46* * -0.31 cm @xmath48 @xmath47 , @xmath46* * -0.31 cm @xmath49 @xmath47 , and @xmath46* * -0.364 cm @xmath50 @xmath47 , respectively .
since the local basis is four dimensional , 16 possible operators @xmath51 arise , @xmath52 which operate on the basis states of a single orbital @xmath17 ( with @xmath53 being the four - dimensional unit matrix and the action of @xmath54 as summarized in table [ tab : fermion - ops ] ( for @xmath55 ) ) .
note that the dimension of @xmath54 is four , while the ( full ) operator @xmath51 acting on the total state is 4@xmath56 .
c|cccc @xmath54 & * * -0.31 cm & * * -0.31 cm @xmath48 & * * -0.31 cm @xmath49 & * * -0.364 cm @xmath50 + * * -0.31 cm & @xmath57 & @xmath58 & @xmath59 & @xmath60 + * * -0.31 cm @xmath48 & @xmath61 & @xmath62 & @xmath63 & @xmath64 + * * -0.31 cm @xmath49 & @xmath65 & @xmath66 & @xmath67 & @xmath68 + * * -0.364 cm @xmath50 & @xmath69 & @xmath70 & @xmath71 & @xmath72 + the structure of the @xmath73 one - orbital operators @xmath54 is rather trivial : each operator contains a single element being equal to one at matrix position @xmath74 , @xmath75 where @xmath76 is the initial state and @xmath77 is the final state .
it thus acts like a transition matrix from state @xmath76 to @xmath77 .
explicitly , we may write the one - orbital operator @xmath54 as @xmath78 such that the matrix elements of @xmath54 can be expressed as a kronecker delta , @xmath79),m}$ ] for @xmath55 , and the one - orbital states are labeled by @xmath80 and @xmath81 . for the many - electron wave function in occupation - number - vector representation
the multi - site reduced density matrices can be expressed using products of @xmath51 operators acting on specific sites .
the one - orbital reduced density matrix @xmath15 can then be calculated by taking those operators which do not change the single - orbital basis state @xcite , @xmath82 where the expectation value is calculated from the total electronic state .
we may abbreviate this structure in tabular form as summarized in table [ tab : rho1-fermion ] .
once the one - orbital reduced density matrix @xmath15 is constructed , @xmath83 can be determined from its eigenvalues @xmath84 according to eq .
( [ eq : s1 ] ) .
.expressing the single - orbital reduced density matrix , @xmath85 , in terms of single - orbital operators , @xmath86 , defined in table [ tab : fermion - ops ] . for better readability only the operator number indices , @xmath87 are shown corresponding to @xmath88 . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] table [ tab : energiescsh ] summarizes all electronic energies obtained from dmrg calculations for the dissociation of the csh molecule . as aforementioned , the maximum number of renormalized active system states was set to 1024 with a quantum information loss of @xmath89 , while the minimum number of renormalized active system states was increased as mentioned in the table until convergence with respect to @xmath87 was reached .
again , the maximum number of renormalized active - system states was kept for at most one microiteration step , while the quantum information loss was considerably smaller than the chosen threshold of 10@xmath90 .
hence , increasing @xmath91 would result in an energy decrease of considerably less than 1 mhartree as observed for the n@xmath44 molecules .
lccccccc & + method & @xmath92 & @xmath93 & @xmath94 & @xmath95 + + @xmath96 & @xmath977783.946 277 & @xmath97 & @xmath977783.884 358 & @xmath977784.900 746 + @xmath98 & @xmath977783.970 497 & @xmath977783.949 555 & @xmath977783.907 986 & @xmath977784.905 747 + @xmath99 & @xmath977783.971 143 & @xmath977783.950 064 & @xmath977783.908 452 & @xmath977784.906 309 + for dmrg(10,46)[512,1024,@xmath89 ] calculations for the n@xmath44 molecule at different internuclear distances .
the orbitals are numbered and sorted according to their ( casscf ) natural occupation numbers .
each orbital index in the @xmath83 diagram indicates one molecular orbital and corresponds to the same natural orbital as numbered in the mutual information plot .
those orbitals which are included in the cas(10,8)scf calculations are marked in red in the single - orbital entropy diagram .
the total quantum information sums up to 7.63 , and 8.26 for increasing distances . ]
|
correlation energy central quantity in quantum chemistry defined as error in electronic energy calculated within independent - particle model of hartree fock theory exact solution electronic schrdinger equation electronic energy obtained from full configuration interaction approach no distinction between electron correlation effects energy divided into three categories dynamic static nondynamic dynamic correlation energy responsible for keeping electrons apart attributed to configurations with small absolute weights in wave function expansion nondynamic static contributions involve determinants with large weights necessary for treatment quasi - degeneracy of orbitals static electron correlation embraces suitable combination determinants spin symmetries interactions nondynamic correlation molecule separate into fragments quantum chemical methods developed to describe dynamic nondynamic static correlation effects mller plesset perturbation theory single - reference coupled cluster theory successful dynamic correlation effects in single - reference complete active space consistent field approach suitable static correlation in multi - reference problems neglect of one correlation effects may to errors to hybrid approaches active space second - perturbation theory multi - reference cc ansatz limitationsknowledge about dynamic nondynamic static electron correlation effects required appropriate method reliable results severe when spectroscopic accuracy 0.01 ev desired consideration dynamic static nondynamic correlation effects challenge for quantum chemistry quality of single- multi - reference quantum chemical methods estimated by diagnostic tools examples absolute squared weights of reference principal configuration @xmath6 coefficient from ci calculation euclidean norm of @xmath7 amplitudes as @xmath8 @xmath9 diagnostics related @xmath10 @xmath11 measures based on single double excitations in - cc theory different group diagnostic measures based on concepts quantum information theory exploits knowledge one - particle reduced density matrix two - particle reduced density matrix weights from excited configurations wave function expansion distribution of unpaired electrons complementary classification of electron correlation effects entanglement measures among molecular orbitals proposed by analysis based on entanglement among orbitals one orbital with encoded in fci - type wave functionstudy of iron nitrosyl complexes @xcite complicated electronic structures showed static nondynamic dynamic contributions to correlation energy single- multi - reference nature quantum system distinguished examining entanglement patterns orbitals entanglement analysis comprises two entropic measures single - orbital entropy@xcite @xmath12 four occupations orbital entanglement between one orbital orbital space from eigenvalues @xmath14 one - orbital reduced density matrix @xmath15 mutual information@xcite @xmath16 entanglement of two orbitals @xmath17 @xmath18 in active space orbitals @xmath19 two - orbital entropy between orbitals calculated from eigenvalue of two - orbital reduced density matrix @xmath21 16 no two - electron states @xmath22 kronecker delta one- two - orbital density matrices determined from many - particle density matrix by tracing out many - electron states on active - space orbitals orbital @xmath17 @xmath18 entanglement studiedoccupation - number - vector expansion electronic wave function from @xmath23 orbitals @xmath24 decomposed into states @xmath25 @xmath26 remaining orbitals one orbital @xmath17 environment states @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 total electronic state as @xmath30 system two orbitals @xmath17 split environment states @xmath27 as @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 total electronic state reads @xmath34 one- two - orbital density matrix operator expressed as @xmath35 @xmath36 derive one- two - orbital density matrices calculated from expansion coefficients @xmath37 @xmath38 total quantum information wave function calculated from single - orbital entropies @xmath39 large single - orbital entropies @xmath40 large values mutual information @xmath41 indicate important for nondynamic correlation effects medium - sized single - orbital entropies @xmath42 moderately entangled orbitals small orbital entropies @xmath43 values @xmath41 attributed to static dynamic correlation effectsapproach reduces electron correlation effects in wave function to quantities for orbital basis compared aim paper twofold provides computational prescription for calculation entanglement measures introduced in in section measures discussed in bond - forming bond - breaking processes in section [ sec : bond ] demonstrate single - orbital entropy cleavage of chemical bonds conceptual understanding of electronic structures entangled orbitals pictorial representation of bonds between atoms emerges from single - orbital entropy diagrams focus on small diatomic molecules n@xmath44 , f@xmath44 and csh molecules matrix representation of one and two - orbital reduced density matrices @xmath15 and @xmath21 constructed from fermionic correlation functions @xcite or generalized correlation functions@xcite present formalism relying on latter ones for spin-1/2 fermionic model single - electron basis states orbitals ) can be empty occupied with @xmath13- or electron or doubly occupied with two electrons of paired spinstates @xmath46 -0.31 cm -0.364 cm @xmath50 local basis four dimensional 16 operators @xmath51 @xmath52 operate single orbital @xmath17 @xmath53 four - unit matrix action @xmath54 table fermion - ops @xmath55 dimension @xmath54 four full operator @xmath51 total state 4@xmath56 @xmath54 -0.31 cm -0.31 cm @xmath48 -0.31 cm @xmath49 -0.364 cm @xmath50 -0.31 cm @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 -0.31 cm @xmath48 @xmath61 @xmath63 @xmath64 -0.31 cm @xmath49 @xmath65 @xmath67 @xmath68 -0.364 cm @xmath50 @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 structure @xmath73 one - orbital operators @xmath54 each operator single element equal one matrix position @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 initial state @xmath77 final state transition matrix from @xmath76 to @xmath77write one - orbital operator @xmath54 as @xmath78 matrix elements as kronecker delta one - orbital states labeled by @xmath80 and @xmath81 many - electron wave function multi - site reduced density matrices using products @xmath51 operators specific sites one - orbital density matrix @xmath15 calculated operators change single - orbital basis state @xcite @xmath82 expectation value calculated from total electronic state abbreviate structure in tabular form in table rho1-fermion one - orbital matrix @xmath15 constructed @xmath83 determined from eigenvalues @xmath84 single - orbital reduced density matrix @xmath85 single - orbital operators @xmath86 defined in table fermion - ops operator number indices @xmath87 to @xmath88 table energiescsh summarizes electronic energies from dmrg calculations for dissociation csh molecule maximum renormalized active system states to 1024 quantum information loss @xmath89 minimum increased until convergence @xmath87 reachedmaximum renormalized active - system states kept for one microiteration step quantum information loss smaller than 10@xmath90 increasing @xmath91 energy decrease less than 1 mhartree for n@xmath44 molecules @xmath92 @xmath96 @xmath977783.946 277.884 358.900 746.970 497.949 555 986 747 @xmath977783.971 143.950 064 452 309 dmrg(10,46)[512,1024,@xmath89 ] calculations for n@xmath44 molecule at different internuclear distances orbitals numbered sorted according natural occupation numbers each orbital index in @xmath83 diagram indicates one molecular orbital same natural orbital mutual information plot orbitals in calculations marked in red in single - orbital entropy diagram total quantum information to 7.63 8.26 for increasing distances
| 0.502806
| 3,192
| 1,617
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,620
|
we present deep wide field ( @xmath0 ) washington @xmath1 ccd surface photometry of the giant elliptical galaxy ngc 4472 , the brightest member in the virgo cluster .
our data cover a wider field than any previous ccd photometry as well as going deeper .
surface brightness profiles of ngc 4472 are not well fit by a single king model , but they can be fit approximately by two king models : with separate models for the inner and outer regions .
surface brightness profiles for the outer region can also be fit approximately by a devaucouleurs law .
there is clearly a negative color gradient within @xmath2 of ngc 4472 , in the sense that the color gets bluer with increasing radius .
the slope of the color gradient for this region is derived to be @xmath3 = 0.08 mag arcsec@xmath4 for @xmath5 , which corresponds to a metallicity gradient of @xmath6 [ fe / h ] @xmath7 dex .
however , the surface color gets redder slowly with increasing radius beyond @xmath2 .
a comparison of the structural parameters of ngc 4472 in @xmath8 and @xmath9 images has shown that there is little difference in the ellipse shapes between isochromes and isophotes .
in addition , photometric and structural parameters of ngc 4472 have been determined
. = = = = = = = = # 1 # 1 # 1 # 1 @mathgroup@group @mathgroup@normal@groupeurmn @mathgroup@bold@groupeurbn @mathgroup@group @mathgroup@normal@groupmsamn @mathgroup@bold@groupmsamn = `` 019 = ' ' 016 = `` 040 = ' ' 336 = " 33e = = = = = = = = # 1 # 1 # 1 # 1 = = = = = = = = [ firstpage ] galaxies : ngc 4472 galaxies : elliptical galaxies : abundances surface photometry color gradient
|
ngc 4472 ( m49 ) is a giant elliptical galaxy in the virgo cluster , located at 4@xmath10 south of ngc 4486 ( m87 ) at the center of the cluster .
ngc 4472 is the brightest member of the virgo cluster , some 0.2 mag brighter than the cd galaxy m87 .
ngc 4472 is an outstanding example of giant elliptical galaxies showing a bimodality in the color distribution of globular clusters ( geisler , lee & kim 1996 ; lee , kim & geisler 1998 ) .
the bimodal color distribution of the globular clusters in ngc 4472 has shown that there are two kinds of cluster populations in this galaxy : a metal - poor population with a mean metallicity of [ fe / h ] @xmath11 dex and a more spatially concentrated metal - rich population with a mean metallicity of [ fe / h ] @xmath12 dex .
interestingly it is found that the metal - rich globular clusters show some properties in common with the galaxy halo stars in their spatial distribution and color profiles , while the metal - poor globular clusters do not show such behavior .
this result indicates that there may exist some connection between the metal - rich globular clusters and halo stars in ngc 4472 ( lee et al .
1998 ) .
[ cols="<,^,^,^ , < " , ] it is found that there is clearly a negative color gradient for @xmath13 (= 15 kpc ) in ngc 4472 in the sense that the color gets bluer with increasing radius : @xmath14 mag arcsec@xmath4 for @xmath15 . in general ,
color gradients in giant elliptical galaxies are interpreted as evidence for a metallicity gradient , while color gradients in dwarf galaxies may be due to age effects ( vader et al .
1988 ; peletier et al .
the color gradient in the inner region of ngc 4472 corresponds to a metallicity gradient of @xmath6[fe / h ] @xmath7 dex .
this result is similar to that derived from the line - strength gradient for @xmath16 of ngc 4472 by davies et al .
this value for ngc 4472 is similar to the mean value known for giant elliptical galaxies , @xmath6[fe / h]@xmath17 dex ( kormendy & djorgovski 1989 ; peletier et al .
1990 ; davies , sadler & peletier 1993 ) .
the metallicity gradient in ngc 4472 may result from dissipational collapse .
however , the metallicity gradients predicted by conventional models of galaxy formation based on dissipational collapse ( larson 1975 ; carlberg 1984 ) are much steeper than the value observed in ngc 4472 . considering that the metallicity gradients can be diluted by a factor of 2 over three merger events @xcite , davies et al .
( 1993 ) pointed out that the shallow metallicity gradients support the hypothesis that giant elliptical galaxies form by stellar mergers , and that the line - strength ( metallicity ) gradient may be due to their progenitors which formed predominantly by dissipational collapse .
some of the observed properties of the globular clusters in ngc 4472 also support the merger hypothesis for the formation of ngc 4472 , while some do not .
this point was discussed in detail by lee et al .
( 1998 ) .
on the other hand , it is difficult to understand in terms of galaxy formation that the color profile of ngc 4472 shows a positive gradient in the outer region at @xmath18 .
this trend was also shown by the @xmath19 color profile given by cohen ( 1986 ) , but this @xmath19 color profile showed a positive color gradient even for the inner region which is contrary to others , as seen in fig .
other deep photometry of the outer region of ngc 4472 and other giant elliptical galaxies are needed to investigate this feature further .
we have presented surface photometry in washington @xmath8 and @xmath9 filters for a wide field centered on the brightest elliptical galaxy in virgo , ngc 4472 .
our data cover a wider field than those of any previous ccd surface photometry , and our photometry goes deeper than any previous photometry .
primary results obtained in this study are summarized as follows : \(1 ) surface brightness profiles for the outer region of ngc 4472 obtained in this study lie between those found in the wide field photographic studies of king ( 1978 ) and caon et al .
the surface brightness profiles of ngc 4472 are not fit well by a single king model , but they can be fit approximately by two king models : one for the inner region and the other for the outer region .
surface brightness profiles for the outer region can be fit approximately also by a devaucouleurs law .
\(2 ) there is obviously a negative color gradient for the region at @xmath13 of ngc 4472 in the sense that the colors get bluer with increasing radius .. the slope of the color gradient for this region is derived to be @xmath14 mag arcsec@xmath4 for @xmath5 , which corresponds to a metallicity gradient of @xmath6[fe / h ] @xmath7 dex
. however , the surface color appears to get redder slowly with increasing radius for the region with @xmath18 .
\(3 ) a comparison of the structural parameters of ngc 4472 in @xmath8 and @xmath9 images has shown that there is little difference in the ellipse shapes between isochromes and isophotes .
\(4 ) photometric and structural parameters of ngc 4472 have been determined , which are listed in table 3 .
this research is supported by the ministry of education , basic science research institute grant no.bsri-98-5411 ( to m.g.l . ) .
barsony , m. 1989 , phd thesis , caltech bender , r. , & mllenhoff , c. 1987 , a&a , 177 , 71 boroson , t. a. & thompson , i. b. 1987 , aj , 93 , 33 caon , n. , capaccioli , m. & donofrio , m. 1994 , a&as , 126 , 199 carlberg , r. g. 1984 , apj , 286 , 403 canterna , r. 1976 , aj , 81 , 228 cohen , j. g. 1986 , aj , 92 , 1039 davies , r. l. , sadler , e. m. , & peletier , r. f. 1993 , mnras , 262 , 650 davis , r. , & birkinshaw , m. 1988 , apjs , 68 , 409 devaucouleurs , g. , devaucouleurs , a , corwin , jr . , h. g. , buta , r. j. , paturel , g. & fouque , p. 1991
, _ third reference catalogue of bright galaxies _ , springer - verlag elias , j. 1994 , noao newsletter , no .
37 , 1 ferrarese , l. , van den bosch , f. c. , ford , h. c. , jaffe , w. & oconnell , r. w. 1994 , aj , 108 , 1598 forbes , d. a. , brodie , j. p. & grillmair , c. j. 1997 , aj , 113 , 1652 franx , m. , illingworth , g. , & heckman , t. 1989 , apj , 344 , 613 geisler , d. & forte , j. c. 1990 , apj , 350 , l5 geisler , d. 1996 , aj , 111 , 480 geisler , d. , lee , m. g. & kim , e. 1996 , aj , 111 , 1529 jaffe , w. , ford , h. c. , oconnell , r. w. , van den bosch , f. c. & ferraresse , l. 1994 , aj , 108 , 1567 kent , s. m. 1985 , pasp , 97 , 165 king , i. r. 1966 , aj , 71 , 64 king , i. r. 1978 , aj , 221 , 1 kormendy , j. , & djordovski , s. 1989 , ara&a , 27 , 235 larson , r. b. 1975 , mnras , 173 , 671 lauer , t. r. 1985 , apjs , 57 , 473 lee , m. g. , kim , e. & geisler , d. 1998 , aj , 115 , 947 mclaughlin , d. e. 1999 , aj , 117 , 2398 michard , r. 1985 , a&as , 59 , 205 mihalas , d. , & binney , j. 1981 , galactic astronomy ( w.h freeman and company , san francisco ) , 309 peletier , r. f. , davis , r. l. , illingworth , g. d. , davis , l. e. & cawson , m. 1990 , aj , 100 , 1091 pilachowski , c. , goodrich , b. , binkert , b. & africano , j. 1989 , noao newsletter , no .
15 , 14 taylor , b. j. 1985 , apjs , 60 , 577 tifft , w. g. 1969 , aj , 74 , 354 vader , j. p. , vigroux , l. , lachize - rey , m. , & souviron , j. 1988 , a&a , 203 , 217 van den bosch , f. c. , ferraresse , l. , jaffe , w. , ford , h. c. & oconnell , r. w. 1994 , aj , 108 , 1579 white , s. d. m. 1980 , mnras , 191 , 1p
|
ngc 4472 ( m49 ) giant elliptical galaxy in virgo cluster at 4@xmath10 south of ngc 4486 ( m87 ) center brightest member 0.2 mag brighter than cd galaxy m87 bimodality in color distribution globular clusters ( geisler lee kim 1996 1998 ) bimodal color distribution two cluster populations metal - poor population mean metallicity @xmath11 dex metal - rich population metallicity @xmath12 dex metal - rich globular clusters show properties with galaxy halo stars spatial distribution color profiles metal - poor clusters indicates connection between metal - rich globular clusters and halo stars in ( lee et al . 1998 ) negative color gradient for @xmath13 (= 15 kpc ) in ngc 4472 gets bluer with increasing radius : @xmath14 color gradients in giant elliptical galaxies for metallicity gradient to age effects ( vader et 1988 color gradient in inner region of ngc 4472 corresponds to metallicity gradient of @xmath6[fe / h ] @xmath7 dex result similar to line - strength gradient @xmath16 of ngc 4472 by davies et al value 4472 similar to mean value for giant elliptical galaxies @xmath6 /@xmath17 dex 1989 1990 1993 metallicity gradient in ngc 4472 may from dissipational collapse gradients predicted by conventional models galaxy formation steeper than ngc 4472 metallicity gradients diluted by factor 2 over three merger events shallow metallicity gradients support hypothesis giant elliptical galaxies form by stellar mergers line - strength gradient due to progenitors by dissipational collapse some properties globular clusters in ngc 4472 support merger hypothesis some not discussed by lee et al . 1998 difficult to understand color profile of ngc 4472 shows positive gradient in outer region at @xmath18 trend shown by @xmath19 color profile cohen 1986 positive color gradient inner region contrary to others deep photometry of outer region of ngc 4472 other giant elliptical galaxies needed to investigatepresented surface photometry washington @xmath8 @xmath9 filters brightest elliptical galaxy virgo ngc 4472 data cover wider field previous ccd photometry deeper results summarized surface brightness profiles outer region ngc 4472 between wide field photographic studies king ( 1978 caon et al not fit single king model fit two king models inner outer region region fit by devaucouleurs law negative color gradient region at @xmath13 ngc 4472 colors bluer increasing radius slope color gradient @xmath14 mag arcsec@xmath4 @xmath5 corresponds metallicity gradient of @xmath6[fe / h ] @xmath7 dex surface color redder increasing radius region @xmath18 comparison structural parameters ngc 4472 @xmath8 @xmath9 images little difference in ellipse shapes between isochromes isophotes photometric structural parameters of ngc 4472 determined listed in table 3 research supported by ministry of education basic science research institute grant no.bsri-98-5411 barsony , m. 1989 phd thesis caltech bender r. mllenhoff c.1987 a&a 177 , 71 boroson thompson. 1987 93 , 33 caon capaccioli donofrio m. 1994 a&as 126 , 199 carlberg r. 1984 286 , 403 canterna . 1976 81 , 228 cohen. 1986 92 , 1039 davies sadler peletier.. 1993 mnras 262 , 650 davis birkinshaw m. 1988 68 , 409 devaucouleurs corwin jr buta. paturel fouque. 1991 third reference catalogue bright galaxies springer - verlag elias 1994 noao newsletter 37 , 1 ferrarese van den bosch ford h jaffe oconnell r.. 1994 108 , 1598 forbes brodie. grillmair.. 1997 113 , 1652 franx illingworth heckman. 1989 344 , 613 geisler d. forte j.. 1990 350 , l5 geisler d. 1996 111 , 480 geisler lee. kim e.1996 111 , 1529 jaffe ford oconnell van den bosch ferraresse 1994 108 , 1567 kent 1985 97 , 165 king 1966 71 , 64 king 1978 221 , 1 kormendy djordovski 1989 ara&a 27 , 235 larson. 1975 173 , 671 lauer 1985 57 , 473 lee kim geisler d 1998 115 , 947 mclaughlin 1999 117 , 2398 michard 1985&as 59 , 205 mihalas binney 1981 galactic astronomy freeman company san francisco, 309 peletier davis illingworth davis cawson 1990 100 , 1091 pilachowski goodrich binkert africano 1989 newsletter 15 , 14 taylor 1985 60 , 577 tifft 1969 74 , 354 vader vigroux lachize - rey souviron j 1988&a 203 , 217 van den bosch fferraresse jaffe ford h. oconnell. 1994 108 1579 white s d.. 1980 mnras 191 1p
| 0.350899
| 2,315
| 1,246
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,622
|
we study optimal double helices with straight axes ( or the fattest tubes around them ) computationally using three kinds of functionals ; ideal ones using ropelength , best volume packing ones , and energy minimizers using two one - parameter families of interaction energies between two strands of types @xmath0 and @xmath1 .
we compare the numerical results with experimental data of dna .
2010 _ mathematics subject classification .
_ 53c65 , 53a04 , 51p05 , 31c99 , 57m25
|
in this paper we study three kinds of functionals for a one - parameter family of infinitely long double helices with straight axes that have radius @xmath2 and _ slope _ @xmath3 , i.e. _ pitch _ @xmath4 :
@xmath5 \g_1(a)=\{(\cos\theta , \sin\theta , a\theta)\ } , \>\g_2(a)=\{(-\cos\theta , -\sin\theta , a\theta)\ } , \end{array}\ ] ] and compute the optimal slopes with respect to them numerically .
the first functional is the `` _ average ropelength _ '' which is the smallest length of a rope with unit thickness which is needed to make one twist of the double helix .
it is a dual notion of _ thickness_@xcite which is the radius of the `` fattest tube '' around a curve , or equivalently , the minimum _ global radius of curvature_@xcite . to be precise
, the thickness of a curve @xmath6 , which we denote by @xmath7 , is given by the supremum of the radii @xmath8 so that a tubular @xmath9-neighbourhood of @xmath6 ( denoted by @xmath10 ) can be embedded , i.e. the supremum of @xmath8 so that the normal discs to @xmath6 of radius @xmath9 at distinct points never intersect @xcite .
the _ ropelength _ is the ratio of the length @xmath11 of @xmath6 and the thickness @xmath7@xcite .
a knot that minimizes the ropelength in its isotopy class is called an _ ideal knot _ after stasiak . in other words ,
an ideal knot is a knot whose fattest tubular neighbourhood maximizes a scale invariant functional on the space of knots defined by @xmath12 in its isotopy class .
the ideal double helix was computed by sylwester przybyl and piotr pieraski@xcite .
the second is the `` _ packing proportion _ '' , in other words , the ratio of the volume of the fattest tubes and that of the circumscribed cylinder of the tubes ( figure [ 0635805_cylinder ] ) .
the best volume packing double helix was computed by kasper olsen and jakob bohr@xcite .
the last is an `` _ average mutual energy _ '' , which is a central topic of the paper . an _ energy of knots _ is a functional on the space of knots which was introduced to produce a representative embedding for each isotopy class as an energy minimizer in the isotopy class .
the first example was obtained as the renormalization of @xmath13-modified potential energy of knots@xcite .
this energy is sometimes called the _ mbius energy _ because it is invariant under mbius transformations of the ambient space , but in fact , there are many other energies which are also invariant under mbius transformations@xcite .
the energy blows up if a knot degenerates to a singular knot with double points .
therefore a knot can be deformed to decrease its energy without having self - crossing , and hence one can expect that the isotopy class would be kept the same during the deformation .
many kinds of energies have been studied intensively for about twenty years , forming a branch of mathematics called `` physical knot theory '' . in this paper
we use two one parameter families of energies for @xmath14 , @xmath15 where @xmath9 denotes the distance @xmath16 between a pair of points .
namely , we consider the integration of modified coulomb s potential and the screened coulomb s potential ( yukawa potential ) . as both diverges because of non - compactness of the domain of integration , we take the `` average per one twist '' , in other words , we consider the integration on @xmath17 , where @xmath18 is a subarc of @xmath19 that winds up just once around the axis . as we only consider the interaction between two strands @xmath19 and @xmath20 , the energies are well - defined without renormalization .
we compute the slopes that minimize the above energies and see how they depend on the parameters @xmath21 and @xmath22 .
we will compare our numerical results with experimental data of dna reported by stasiak and maddocks .
we remark that our strategy of looking for optima double helices with respect to one of the three kinds of functionals above mentioned does not work for single helices .
in fact , our functionals are all optimized when the slope @xmath23 goes to @xmath24 , i.e. when the curve approaches a straight line .
let @xmath6 be a curve .
let @xmath25 be the distance function : @xmath26 .
the _ doubly critical self distance _ of @xmath6@xcite , denoted by @xmath27 , is the smallest positive critical value of @xmath28 , i.e. @xmath29 where @xmath30 denotes the tangent vector to @xmath6 at @xmath31 .
then the thickness of a knot @xmath6 is given by @xcite @xmath32 remark that , for a fixed point @xmath33 , the radius of curvature at @xmath33 is a local quantity whereas @xmath34 is a global quantity .
we remark that , in the case of a _ single _ helix with slope @xmath23 , maritan , micheletti , trovato , and banavar@xcite showed that there is a critical slope @xmath35 such that the thickness is given by the half of the doubly critical self distance if @xmath36 and by the minimum radius of curvature if @xmath37 .
let @xmath38 be the length of @xmath39 per one twist .
it is equal to @xmath40 .
define the _ average ropelength _ of a double helix @xmath39 with slope @xmath23 , denoted by @xmath41 , by @xmath42 where @xmath43 denotes the thickness of @xmath39 .
let us compute the slope @xmath23 of an _ ideal double helix _
, i.e. the slope @xmath23 that attains the minimum average ropelength .
the thickness @xmath43 of @xmath39 is given as follows .
the radius of curvature is constantly equal to @xmath44 . on the other hand ,
the doubly critical self distance is equal to the distance between a point @xmath45 and @xmath20 .
the latter is given by @xmath46 if @xmath47 and by @xmath48 where
@xmath49 @xmath50 is given by @xmath51 if @xmath52 .
therefore , by , the thickness is given by the half of the doubly critical self distance for any @xmath23 : @xmath53 \frac12\sqrt{2 + 2\cos\theta_0+a^2{\theta_0}^2}\>,&\ > ( 0<\theta_0<\pi , \sin\theta_0=a^2\theta_0 ) & \>\>(0<a<1 ) . \end{array } \right.\ ] ] when @xmath47 we have @xmath54 which takes the minimum value @xmath55 at @xmath56 .
the numerical computation using maple implies that the average ropelength takes the minimum which is approximately equal to @xmath57 at @xmath58 ( figure [ av_t_g_c2 ] ) , when the thickness @xmath59 is @xmath60 and the ratio of the pitch and the thickness is @xmath61 .
0.2 cm the above result is not new : this double helix with a straight axis that is optimal with respect to the ropelength ( figure [ 082074_wogrid ] ) had already been reported by pieranski@xcite , fig .
12 ( b ) .
the equation implies that the closest point in @xmath20 from a point in @xmath19 can be found in the opposite side when @xmath47 and in an upward ( or downward ) direction when @xmath52 .
it means that the curve of the contact of two fattest tubes around @xmath19 and @xmath20 is the straight axis when @xmath47 i.e. when the ratio of pitch and thickness satisfies @xmath62 , and a helix between @xmath19 and @xmath20 when @xmath63 i.e. when @xmath64 , as was explained by stasiak and maddocks@xcite .
next we compute the slope of `` best packed '' tubular double helix , namely , a double helix that maximizes the ratio of the volume of the fattest tubular neighbourhood and the volume of the circumscribed cylinder of the tubes ( figure [ 0635805_cylinder ] ) .
this `` packing proportion function '' is given by @xmath65 where @xmath43 is the thickness of @xmath39 .
when @xmath47 we have @xmath66 which takes the maximum value at @xmath67 at @xmath56 . the numerical computation using maple implies that the packing proportion takes the maximum which is approximately equal to @xmath68 at @xmath69 ( figure [ pr ] ) , when the thickness @xmath59 is @xmath70 and the ratio of the pitch and the thickness is @xmath71 . ] 0.4 cm ] 0.2 cm the best volume packing double helix had already been studied by kasper olsen and jakob bohr@xcite .
define the _ @xmath0-modified coulomb s potential _ of @xmath20 at a point @xmath33 in @xmath19 by @xmath72
we assume @xmath73 so that @xmath74 is finite . as @xmath21 increases @xmath74
is dominated by the contribution of near - by points .
remark that it does not depend on the point @xmath75 because of the symmetry .
define the _ average cross - term @xmath0-modified coulomb s potential energy _ of @xmath39 by @xmath76
the asymptotic behavior of @xmath77 as @xmath23 goes to @xmath78 or @xmath79 is given as follows : @xmath80 as @xmath81 and @xmath82 as @xmath83 , where @xmath84 and @xmath85 .
numerical experiments using maple imply that , for each @xmath73 , @xmath77 is a convex function of @xmath23 . the graphs of @xmath77 when @xmath86 and @xmath87 are illustrated in figures [ m2 - 1 ] and [ m1000 - 1 ] . ] 0.4 cm ] [ cols="^,^,^ " , ] + table ii .
@xmath88-minimizing slopes @xmath89 .
the thickness is always @xmath2 as @xmath47 .
0.1 cm ( diamond ) and a fitting curve @xmath90 ( red ) ] we like to end the section with conjectures implied by numerical experiments .
* conjecture*. let @xmath73 and @xmath91 . 1 . for fixed @xmath21 ,
@xmath77 is a convex function of @xmath23 .
+ for fixed @xmath22 , @xmath92 is a convex function of @xmath23 .
the slope @xmath93 that minimizes @xmath77 is an increasing function of @xmath21 . + the slope @xmath89 that minimizes @xmath88 is an increasing function of @xmath22 .
both @xmath94 and @xmath95 are bounded subsets of @xmath96 , and we have @xmath97 and @xmath98 .
we have studied three kinds of functionals for double helices with straight axes and compute the optimal slopes with respect to them numerically ( i.e. without mathematical proofs ) . if we consider the average ropelength , or equivalently , the ratio of the volume of the fattest tubular neighbourhood and the cube of the length , the maximum is attained by an _ ideal _
double helix , whose slope is @xmath99 ( figure [ graph ] , * _ c _ * ) . if we consider the ratio of the volume of the fattest tubular neighbourhood and that of a circumscribed cylinder of the tubes , the maximum is attained by a best volume packing double helix , whose slope is @xmath100 ( figure [ graph ] , * _ b _ * ) .
if we consider two kinds of one parameter families of interaction energies between two strands of types @xmath0 ( modified coulomb potential ) and @xmath1 ( screened coulomb s potential or yukawa potential ) , the optimal slopes seem to be between @xmath2 and @xmath101 in both cases , approaching @xmath2 ( or @xmath102 ) ( figure [ graph ] , * _ e , f _ * ) as the energy is dominated by the global ( or respectively local ) contribution , i.e. the contribution of near - by points gets weaker ( or respectively stronger ) .
stasiak and maddocks@xcite reported that , in the case of dna , the ratio @xmath103 is @xmath104 ( figure [ graph ] , * _ d _ * ) , which is within 4@xmath105 error of that of optimal double helix if we use `` @xmath106-potential energy '' , i.e. the limit of either interaction energy as the parameter approaches to the critical value when the energy fails to be well - defined , when the contribution of near - by points gets weakest . and
the ratio of the pitch and the thickness @xmath103 , and the optimal ones with respect to various functionals : ( * _ b _ * ) volume packing ratio ( * _ c _ * ) ropelength ( ideal double helix ) ( * _ d _ * ) dna ( * _ e _ * ) the limit of the interaction energy @xmath107 as @xmath108 or @xmath88 as @xmath109 ( conjecture ) ( * _ f _ * ) the limit of the interaction energy @xmath107 as @xmath110 or @xmath88 as @xmath111 ( conjecture ) .
any point between @xmath112 and @xmath113 can be realized as an optimal slope with respect to some interaction energy . ]
the author would like to thank the organizers and participants of the conference `` statistical physics and topology of polymers with ramifications to structure and function of dna and proteins '' for stimulating conversations .
in fact , he started to compute the energy @xmath88 after a suggestion by a participant after the talk .
the author is sorry not to have recognized the name .
the author would also like to thank andrzej stasiak and the referee for helpful suggestions and the references , and kasper olsen and jakob bohr for new information and references .
|
paper study three functionals for one - parameter family long double helices with straight axes radius @xmath2 slope @xmath3 pitch @xmath4 @xmath5 \g_1(a)=\cos\theta \sin\theta a\theta)\g_2(a)=-\cos\theta -\theta\theta{array compute optimal slopes numerically first functional average ropelength smallest length rope unit thickness needed one twist double helix dual notion of thickness_@xcite radius of fattest tube around curve minimum global radius of curvature_@xcite thickness of curve @xmath6 @xmath7 given by supremum of radii @xmath8 tubular @xmath9-neighbourhood @xmath6 embedded normal discs @xmath6 radius @xmath9 never intersect @xcite ropelength ratio of length @xmath11 of @xmath6 thickness @xmath7@xcite knot minimizes ropelength class ideal knot _ after ideal knot fattest tubular neighbourhood maximizes scale invariant functional on space knots defined by @xmath12 classideal double helix computed by sylwester przybyl piotr pieraski second is packing proportion ratio of volume fattest tubes circumscribed cylinder figure 0635805_cylinder best volume packing double helix computed by kasper olsen jakob bohr last average mutual energy central topic paper energy of knots _ functional on space knots introduced representative embedding for isotopy class energy minimizer first example renormalization of @xmath13-modified potential energy of knots energy mbius energy invariant under mbius transformations other energies invariant transformations energy blows up if knot degenerates to singular knot with double points knot deformed to decrease energy without self - crossing isotopy class same during deformation energies studied for twenty years physical knot theory paper two one parameter families of energies for @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath9 denotes distance @xmath16 between points consider integration of modified coulomb s potential screened coulomb s potential non - compactness domain integration average per one twist '' consider integration on @xmath17 @xmath18 subarc of @xmath19 winds up once around axisconsider interaction between strands @xmath19 @xmath20 energies defined without renormalization compute slopes energies on parameters @xmath21 @xmath22 compare numerical results with data dna stasiak maddocks strategy optima double helices functionals work for single helices functionals optimized when slope @xmath23 to @xmath24 curve approaches straight line @xmath6 be curve @xmath25 distance function @xmath26 doubly critical self distance of @xmath6@xcite @xmath27 smallest positive value of @xmath28 @xmath30 tangent vector to @xmath6 @xmath31 thickness of knot @xmath6 given by @xcite @xmath32 fixed point @xmath33 radius of curvature at @xmath33 local @xmath34 global single helix with slope @xmath23 critical slope @xmath35 thickness given by half doubly critical self distance @xmath36 minimum radius of curvature if @xmath37 @xmath38 length of @xmath39 per one twist equal to @xmath40define average ropelength double helix @xmath39 slope @xmath23 denoted @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 thickness @xmath39 compute slope @xmath23 ideal double helix minimum average ropelength thickness @xmath43 @xmath39 radius curvature equal @xmath44 doubly critical self distance equal distance between point @xmath45 @xmath20 latter given by @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 if @xmath52 thickness given half doubly critical self distance @xmath23 @xmath53\frac12\sqrt{2 + 2\cos\theta_0+a^2{\theta_0}^2}^2\theta_0 @xmath47 @xmath54 takes minimum value @xmath55 at @xmath56 numerical computation implies average ropelength takes minimum equal to @xmath57 at @xmath58 thickness @xmath59 is @xmath60 ratio pitch thickness @xmath610.2 cm result new double helix straight axis optimal ropelength figure 082074_wogrid reported by pieranski@xcite fig 12 equation implies closest point @xmath20 @xmath19 opposite side @xmath47 upward @xmath52 curve contact fattest tubes around @xmath19 @xmath20 straight axis @xmath47 ratio pitch thickness satisfies @xmath62 helix between @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath63 @xmath64 explained by stasiak maddocks@xcite compute slope best packed tubular double helix maximizes ratio volume fattest tubular neighbourhood volume circumscribed cylinder tubes figure 0635805_cylinder packing proportion function @xmath65 @xmath43 thickness @xmath39 @xmath47 @xmath66 maximum at @xmath67 @xmath56 computation packing proportion maximum equal to @xmath68 @xmath69 figure thickness @xmath59 @xmath70 ratio pitch thickness @xmath71 0.4 cm 0.2 cm best volume packing double helix studied by kasper olsen jakob bohr@xcitedefine @xmath0-modified coulomb potential @xmath20 point @xmath33 @xmath19 assume @xmath73 @xmath74 finite @xmath21 increases @xmath74 dominated near - points depend point @xmath75 symmetry average cross - term @xmath0-modified coulomb potential energy @xmath39 @xmath76 asymptotic behavior @xmath77 @xmath23 @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 @xmath85 numerical experiments @xmath73 @xmath77 convex function @xmath23 graphs @xmath77 @xmath86 @xmath87 illustrated figures cm @xmath88-minimizing slopes @xmath89 thickness @xmath2 @xmath47 0.1 cm fitting curve @xmath90 end section conjectures numerical experiments @xmath73 @xmath91 fixed @xmath21 @xmath77 convex function @xmath23 @xmath22 @xmath92 convex function @xmath23 slope @xmath93 minimizes @xmath77 increasing function @xmath21 slope @xmath89 minimizes @xmath88 function @xmath22@xmath94 and @xmath95 subsets of @xmath96 @xmath97 and @xmath98 studied three functionals for double helices with straight axes compute optimal slopes numerically without mathematical proofs consider average ropelength ratio of volume of fattest tubular neighbourhood cube of length maximum attained by ideal double helix slope is @xmath99 ratio volume fattest tubular neighbourhood circumscribed cylinder of tubes maximum attained by best volume packing double helix slope is @xmath100 one parameter families of interaction energies between types @xmath0 and @xmath1 optimal slopes between @xmath2 and @xmath101 approaching @xmath2 or @xmath102 ) as energy dominated by global or local contribution contribution of near - by points gets weaker or stronger stasiak maddocks reported case dna ratio @xmath103 is @xmath104 within 4@xmath105 error of optimal double helix if use @xmath106-potential energy '' limit of interaction energy as parameter approaches to critical value when energy fails well - defined contribution of near - by points weakestratio pitch thickness @xmath103 optimal ones functionals * _ b _ ) volume packing ratio c _ ropelength ideal double helix ) d _ ) dna e _ ) limit interaction energy @xmath107 @xmath108 @xmath88 @xmath109 conjecture f _ ) limit interaction energy @xmath107 @xmath110 @xmath88 @xmath111 conjecture point between @xmath112 @xmath113 optimal slope interaction energy author organizers participants conference `` statistical physics topology polymers structure function dna proteins '' stimulating conversations started compute energy @xmath88 after suggestion participant author sorry not recognized name andrzej stasiak referee suggestions references kasper olsen jakob bohr new information references
| 0.497723
| 3,264
| 1,766
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,623
|
nowadays various estimates of lyapunov dimension of lorenz - like systems attractors @xcite are actively developed . within the frame of this study
the question arises whether it is possible to obtain the corresponding estimates of dimension for the chen and lu systems using the reduction of them to the generalized lorenz system @xcite . in the work
@xcite leonov s method was applied for the estimation of lyapunov dimension , and as a consequence the lyapunov dimension of attractors of the chen and lu systems with the classical parameters was estimated . in the present work
an inaccuracy in @xcite is corrected and it is shown that the revised domain of parameters , where the estimate of lyapunov dimension is valid , does not involve the classical parameters of the chen and lu systems . lorenz - like system , lorenz system , chen system , lu system , kaplan - yorke dimension , lyapunov dimension , lyapunov exponents .
|
nowadays various estimates of lyapunov dimension of attractors of generalized lorenz systems @xcite @xmath0 are actively developed . in the work @xcite the following result on the estimate of lyapunov dimension of the generalized lorenz system
is formulated .
[ errortheorem ] let @xmath1 be invariant compact set of the generalized lorenz system .
suppose that @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 , and @xmath6 . then if it is satisfied one of the following conditions : 1 .
@xmath7 , @xmath8 2 .
@xmath9 , @xmath10 3 .
d = 0 ; and also one of the conditions : 1 .
@xmath11 , @xmath12 2 .
@xmath13 , @xmath14 then @xmath15 is valid .
however in the proof of this result in @xcite there is an inaccuracy , the consideration of which the present work is devoted .
introduce a notion of lyapunov dimension .
consider , for this purpose , the linearization of dynamical system along a solution @xmath16 @xmath17 where @xmath18 is the @xmath19 jacobian matrix evaluated along the trajectory @xmath20 of system .
the fundamental matrix @xmath21 of linearized system is defined by the variational equation @xmath22 let @xmath23 be singular values of a fundamental matrix @xmath24 ( the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix @xmath25 are ordered for each @xmath26 ) .
[ def : le ] the _ lyapunov exponents ( les)_[multiblock footnote omitted ] in the point @xmath27 are the numbers ( or symbols @xmath28 ) @xmath29 following @xcite , introduce a notion of lyapunov dimension . a local lyapunov dimension of a point @xmath27 in the phase space of dynamical system , generated by equation , is a number @xmath30 where @xmath31 are lyapunov exponents ; @xmath32 $ ] is the smallest natural number @xmath33 such that @xmath34 the lyapunov dimension of invariant set @xmath1 of dynamical system is defined by @xmath35 note that les and lyapunov dimension are invariant under the linear change of variable ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
alongside with widely used numerical methods for estimating and computing the lyapunov dimension there exists analytical approach suggested by g.leonov @xcite that is based on the direct lyapunov method .
let us outline the main theorems describing this approach .
let @xmath36 be the eigenvalues of the following matrix @xmath37 [ theorem : th1 ] given an integer @xmath38 $ ] and @xmath39 $ ] , suppose that there is a continuously differentiable scalar function @xmath40 and a nonsingular matrix @xmath41 such that @xmath42 then @xmath43 . here
@xmath44 is derivative of the function @xmath45 with respect to the system .
[ theorem : th2 ] assume that there is a continuously differentiable scalar function @xmath45 and a nonsingular matrix @xmath41 such that @xmath46 then any solution of system , bounded on @xmath47 , tends to an equilibrium as @xmath48 .
thus , if condition holds , then the global attractor of system coincides with its stationary set .
for proving theorem [ errortheorem ] in @xcite it is used above described approach with @xmath49 where @xmath50 and the function @xmath51 where @xmath52 the parameters @xmath53 are chosen in dependence of system parameters in such a way that the conditions of theorem [ theorem : th1 ] or [ theorem : th2 ] are satisfied .
in proving theorem [ errortheorem ] in the work @xcite there is committed an inaccuracy , which does not permit one to obtain a condition for estimating the attractor dimension in the case @xmath54 .
namely , in the proof there is an inaccurate assertion that in the case @xmath55 the inequality @xmath56 yields the inequality @xmath57 where @xmath58 .
let us show that this assertion may be not true .
consider specific values of system parameters and running parameters for which the assertion is not satisfied .
take @xmath59 , @xmath60 , @xmath61 , @xmath62 for which @xmath63 , and @xmath64 , @xmath65 .
then one has @xmath66 .
condition is satisfied since @xmath67 .
however @xmath68 and consequently for @xmath69 the relation @xmath70 is impossible , i.e. condition under such parameters is not satisfied . correcting the above - mentioned inaccuracy ,
we obtain the following result . [ our ] denote by @xmath1 the bounded invariant set of system , involving the point @xmath71 .
suppose that @xmath72 , @xmath73 , @xmath74 , and there exists @xmath75 such that the inequality @xmath76 is satisfied .
let @xmath77 @xmath78 where @xmath79 is defined as in . in this case 1 .
if @xmath80 then any bounded on @xmath81 solution of system tends to a certain equilibrium as @xmath82 ; 2 .
if @xmath83 then @xmath84 for proving theorem [ our ] we uses the matrix @xmath41 , defined according to , and the function @xmath85^{\frac{1}{2}}},\ ] ] where @xmath86 exact value of dimension is obtained here from the comparison of dimension estimate and the value of lyapunov dimension in zero point .
the obtained value corresponds to the dimension of global attractor or a ( local ) b - attractor , involving zero equilibrium .
in 2012 g.a . leonov suggested to consider for the chen and lu systems the following change of variables @xcite @xmath87 with @xmath88 . under this transformation for @xmath89 the chen and lu systems are transformed to the generalized lorenz system with the parameters @xmath90 note that for @xmath91 the chen and the lu systems become linear and their dynamics have minor interest .
thus , without loss of generality , one can assume that @xmath92 .
the transformation with @xmath88 does not change the direction of time for the positive chaotic parameters considered in the works @xcite .
remark that the applying of transformations with the time inversion ( see corresponding discussion of the lorenz , chen and lu systems @xcite ) is not suitable for the study of lyapunov dimension of invariant sets since the absolute values of lyapunov exponents and corresponding local lyapunov dimension in direct and backward time may be different ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
below there are represented domains in the obtained two - dimensional parameter space for which the condition of theorem [ our ] is satisfied . on a plane there
are also shown the points , corresponding to standard parameters of chaotic attractors .
for the lu system such parameters are @xmath93 , and after the change @xmath94 ; for the chen system @xmath95 and @xmath96 . 2 as shown in figs [ figleft]-[figright ] , nor the lu system nor the chen system standard parameters are situated in the obtained domain .
while lyapunov dimension of the classical lorenz attractor has been obtained analytically , for the chen and lu attractors it is still an open problem . also by numerical simulation
we do not find any chaotic attractor of the chen and lu systems with the parameters from the obtained domains . applying the same approach ,
we extend the results , obtained in the case @xmath97 in theorem [ errortheorem ] . [ yangtheorem ] suppose that @xmath98 , and the inequality @xmath99 is satisfied .
let @xmath100 be valid , where @xmath101 is the greater root of the equation @xmath102 where @xmath79 is given according to for @xmath103 . in this case 1 .
if @xmath104 then any bounded on @xmath81 solution of system tends to a certain equilibrium as @xmath82 ; 2 . if @xmath105 then @xmath106 consider , for example , the parameters @xmath107 for which there exists a chaotic attractor . for them
@xmath108 , i.e. @xmath11 is satisfied .
however @xmath109 .
thus , for the above - mentioned parameters theorem [ errortheorem ] can not be applied .
but for them theorem [ yangtheorem ] can be applied since for them a higher root of equation is equal to @xmath110 . ]
similarly it is possible to consider the generalized lorenz system not only with positive @xmath111 , but with the negative ones . [
main ] suppose that @xmath1 is a bounded invariant set of system @xmath112 involving the point @xmath71 .
suppose that @xmath113 , the inequality @xmath114 is valid , and there exist numbers @xmath115 such that @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath118 @xmath119 where @xmath120 . in this case 1 .
if @xmath121 then any bounded on @xmath81 solution of system tends to a certain equilibrium as @xmath82 ; 2 . if @xmath122 then @xmath123
10 url # 1`#1`urlprefixhref # 1#2#2 # 1#1 g. a. leonov , n. v. kuznetsov , on differences and similarities in the analysis of lorenz , chen , and lu systems , applied mathematics and computation 256 ( 2015 ) 334343 .
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.132 [ ] .
y. chen , q. yang , the nonequivalence and dimension formula for attractors of lorenz - type systems , international journal of bifurcation and chaos 23 ( 12 ) ( 2013 ) 1350200 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218127413502003 [ ] .
n. v. kuznetsov , t. a. alexeeva , g. a. leonov , invariance of lyapunov characteristic exponents , lyapunov exponents , and lyapunov dimension for regular and non - regular linearizations , arxiv e - printshttp://arxiv.org / abs/1410.2016 [ ] .
|
estimates of lyapunov dimension attractors generalized lorenz systems @xcite @xmath0 developed work @xcite result lorenz system formulated errortheorem let @xmath1 invariant set lorenz system @xmath2 if satisfied conditions @xmath7 @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 d = 0 @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath15 valid proof @xcite inaccuracy present work devoted introduce notion of lyapunov dimension consider linearization of dynamical system along solution @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 jacobian matrix evaluated trajectory @xmath20 system fundamental matrix @xmath21 linearized system defined by variational equation @xmath22 @xmath23 be singular values of fundamental matrix @xmath24 square roots eigenvalues matrix @xmath25 ordered for each @xmath26 lyapunov exponents @xmath27 are numbers symbols @xmath28 ) @xmath29 introduce notion of lyapunov dimensionlocal lyapunov dimension point @xmath27 phase space dynamical system generated equation number @xmath30 @xmath31 lyapunov exponents @xmath32 smallest natural number @xmath33 @xmath34 lyapunov dimension invariant set @xmath1 dynamical system defined by @xmath35 les lyapunov dimension invariant under linear change variable @xcite lyapunov dimension analytical approach g.leonov @xcite direct lyapunov method main theorems @xmath36 eigenvalues matrix @xmath37 integer @xmath38 @xmath39 $ continuously differentiable scalar function @xmath40 nonsingular matrix @xmath41 @xmath43 @xmath44 derivative function @xmath45 system th2 continuously differentiable scalar function @xmath45 nonsingular matrix @xmath41 @xmath46 solution system bounded @xmath47 tends equilibrium @xmath48 if condition holds global attractor system coincides with stationary set proving theorem errortheorem @xcite used approach @xmath49 @xmath50 function @xmath51 @xmath52 parameters @xmath53 chosen system parameters conditions theorem th1 th2 satisfiedproving theorem errortheorem work @xcite inaccuracy permit condition estimating attractor dimension case @xmath54 proof inaccurate assertion case @xmath55 inequality @xmath56 yields inequality @xmath57 @xmath58 show assertion not true consider specific values system parameters running parameters assertion not satisfied take @xmath59 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 condition satisfied since @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 relation @xmath70 impossible condition parameters not satisfied correcting inaccuracy obtain result denote @xmath1 bounded invariant set system involving point @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 inequality @xmath76 satisfied @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 defined if @xmath80 bounded @xmath81 solution system tends to equilibrium @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 proving theorem uses matrix @xmath41 defined function @xmath85^{1 @xmath86 exact value dimension obtained from comparison dimension estimate value lyapunov dimension zero pointobtained value corresponds to dimension global attractor or local b - attractor zero equilibrium 2012 leonov suggested chen lu systems change of variables @xmath87 with @xmath88 transformation for @xmath89 chen lu systems to lorenz system parameters @xmath90 for @xmath91 chen lu systems become linear dynamics minor interest transformation with @xmath88 change direction time for positive chaotic parameters transformations with time inversion not suitable for study lyapunov dimension invariant sets absolute values lyapunov exponents local lyapunov dimension in direct backward time different represented domains in obtained two - dimensional parameter space condition of theorem satisfied shown points corresponding to standard parameters of chaotic attractors lu system parameters are @xmath93 @xmath94 chen system @xmath95 and @xmath96 nor lu system nor chen system standard parameters in obtained domain lyapunov dimension of classical lorenz attractor obtained analytically chen lu attractors open problem numerical simulation chaotic attractor of chen lu systems with parameters from obtained domainsapproach extend results case @xmath97 theorem errortheorem yangtheorem suppose @xmath98 inequality @xmath99 satisfied @xmath100 valid @xmath101 greater root equation @xmath102 @xmath79 according @xmath103 if @xmath104 bounded @xmath81 solution system tends equilibrium @xmath82 @xmath105 @xmath106 consider parameters @xmath107 chaotic attractor @xmath108 @xmath11 satisfied @xmath109 parameters theorem errortheorem ] not applied yangtheorem ] applied higher root equation equal to @xmath110 consider generalized lorenz system positive @xmath111 negative ones suppose @xmath1 bounded invariant set system @xmath112 point @xmath71 @xmath113 inequality @xmath114 valid numbers @xmath115 @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath118 @xmath119 @xmath120 if @xmath121 bounded on @xmath81 solution system tends equilibrium as @xmath82 if @xmath122 @xmath123 g a. leonov n. v. kuznetsov differences similarities analysis lorenz chen lu systems applied mathematics computation 256 ( 2015 ) 334343..doi.1016.amc.2014.12.132 chen yang nonequivalence dimension formula attractors lorenz - type systems international journal bifurcation chaos 23 ( 12 ) 2013 1350200.doi.1142/s0218127413502003 kuznetsov alexeeva leonov invariance lyapunov exponents dimension regular non - regular linearizations arxiv e - abs/1410.2016
| 0.347001
| 2,363
| 1,259
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,624
|
we investigate spin - vortex excitations in the two - dimensional antiferromagnet on the basis of the nonlinear sigma model .
the model of two - dimensional heisenberg quantum antiferromagnet is mapped onto the ( 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model .
the 2d nonlinear sigma model has an instanton ( or skyrmion ) solution which describes an excitation of spin - vortex type .
quantum fluctuations of instantons are reduced to the study of the coulomb gas , and the gas of instantons of the 2d nonlinear sigma model is in the plasma phase .
we generalize this picture of instanton gas to the ( 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model .
we show , using some approximation , that there is a kosterlitz - thouless transition from the plasma phase to the molecular phase as the temperature is lowered .
|
it is important to understand the magnetic structure of two - dimensional antiferromagnetic in the light - doping region in the study of cuprate high - temperature superconductors@xcite .
the physics of underdoped region , which is expected to be closely related to the pseudogap state , is still not clear .
the influence of doping holes on the antiferromagnetic state in the parent materials of cuprate superconductors is one of the most interesting problems in strongly correlated electron systems .
it has been experimentally found that the stripe order is stabilized in the underdoped region of la@xmath0nd@xmath1sr@xmath2cuo@xmath3,@xcite la@xmath4sr@xmath2cuo@xmath3 ( lsco)@xcite , and la@xmath4ba@xmath2cuo@xmath3@xcite .
a checkerboard - like charge density modulation with a roughly @xmath5 period ( @xmath6 is a lattice spacing ) has also been observed by scanning tunneling microscopy experiments in bi@xmath7sr@xmath7cacu@xmath7o@xmath8 ( bi-2212)@xcite , bi@xmath7sr@xmath4la@xmath2cuo@xmath9@xcite , and ca@xmath4na@xmath2cuo@xmath7cl@xmath10 ( na - ccoc)@xcite .
it has been pointed out that these types of modulated structures can be understood within the framework of correlated electrons by using the variational monte carlo method for the two - dimensional hubbard model@xcite .
it is expected that there appears a new state in an extremely light - doping region where the charge modulated structures such as stripes and checkerboards are instable and only spin - modulations , for example , a spin - vortex state , will be formulated .
the purpose of this paper is to investigate spin - vortex excitation on the basis of the two - dimensional quantum antiferromagnet . in this paper
, we use the mapping of a two - dimensional magnet onto a nonlinear sigma model .
the nonlinear sigma model is a nonlinear field theory and its renormalization properties were applied to ferromagnets in two dimensions@xcite .
the o(3 ) nonlinear sigma model can be interpreted as the continuum limit of an isotropic ferromagnet , and the action is @xmath11 where the three - component scalar field @xmath12 is under the condition @xmath13 .
the two - dimensional quantum heisenberg antiferromagnet is mapped to a ( 2 + 1 ) dimensional nonlinear sigma model .
the ( 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model is@xcite @xmath14,\ ] ] where @xmath15 is a three - component scalar field on the sphere @xmath16 . the parameters @xmath17 and @xmath18 are @xmath19 and @xmath20 where where @xmath21 is the coupling constant of the antiferromagnetic nearest - neighbor interaction , @xmath22 is the magnitude of the spin and @xmath6 is the lattice spacing . in this paper
we consider the two - dimensional case @xmath23 .
we change the scale of @xmath24 by @xmath25 , and then the action is @xmath26.\ ] ] here , we defined in two - space dimensions @xmath23@xcite , @xmath27 for @xmath28 . to be
more precisely , @xmath22 should be replaced by @xmath29 .
although @xmath30 has dimension in this expression , @xmath30 can be dimensionless by scaling the field variables @xmath31 and @xmath24 .
this model describes the nambu - goldstone mode , that is , the spin - wave mode of the quantum antiferromagnetic model .
the renormalization of the spin - wave mode was investigated using the wilson - kogut renormalization method@xcite . in the case of hole doping ,
when the doping rate is small , the nonlinear sigma model is expected to be still relevant if we use the coupling constant @xmath30 renormalized by the doping effect .
it is plausible that we can use the nonlinear sigma model for the extremely light - doping case .
the 2d nonlinear sigma model has an instanton solution @xcite ( being interpreted as skyrmion or meron@xcite ) which describes an excitation of spin - vortex type .
quantum fluctuations of instantons were computed and found to be reduced to the study of the coulomb gas@xcite . according to this study ,
the gas of instantons of the 2d nonlinear sigma model is in the plasma phase .
this means that spin - vortex excitations are independent each other and never form dimers .
this is the case for the two - dimensional classical heisenberg model .
then , we necessarily have a question such as : is this picture still correct for the ( 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model ? to investigate this , we generalize the instanton gas approximation to the ( 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model .
we use the parametrization of the field @xmath15 in terms of a single complex field @xmath32 : @xmath33 where @xmath34 is the complex conjugate of @xmath32 .
then , using the complex variable @xmath35 for @xmath36 , the action is written as @xmath37 here , @xmath38 is @xmath39 a solution that satisfies @xmath40 is called instanton solution .
a typical instanton solution is , for an integer @xmath41 , @xmath42 @xmath43 and @xmath44 ( @xmath45 ) indicate positions of vortex - like excitations in the antiferromagnetic spin order .
this each local structure can be interpreted as a skyrmion . in general ,
@xmath43 and @xmath44 have @xmath24-dependence : @xmath46 , @xmath47 ( @xmath48 . when @xmath43 and @xmath44 are constants , @xmath38 is the integer quantum number equal to @xmath41@xcite .
we assume that @xmath49 and @xmath50 are continuous function of @xmath24 , then @xmath51 is also a continuous function of @xmath24 and @xmath52 since @xmath38 is an integer . for this instanton solution ,
the action is given as @xmath53
fluctuation effect to the partition function was evaluated for the 2d nonlinear sigma model as@xcite @xmath54 where @xmath55 here @xmath56 is the overall constant factor of @xmath32 .
this is the model of classical coulomb gas interacting with the logarithmic interaction .
this contribution comes from the measure of the functional integral by changing the variable @xmath32 to @xmath43 , @xmath44 and @xmath56 .
this is straightforwardly generalized to the present model ; the measure is given as @xmath57 this formula will be used in the following .
let us consider one - instanton state @xmath58 .
if we set @xmath59 , for simplicity , then we obtain @xmath60 at @xmath61 , @xmath62 at @xmath63 and @xmath64 at @xmath65 . in the limit @xmath66 , @xmath67 .
this indicates a pair of spin vortices that disturbs the antiferromagnetic spin order being located at @xmath68 . there is a spin disorder in the region that includes @xmath68 . for @xmath69 ,
the action in eq.(9 ) is given as @xmath70 where @xmath71 is a constant that depends on @xmath72 , and @xmath73 and @xmath74 are complex conjugates of @xmath6 and @xmath75 .
we replace @xmath30 by @xmath76 so that @xmath30 is dimensionless and add the fluctuation effect to this action to obtain @xmath77.\ ] ] this is the model of single particle in the logarithmic potential if we set @xmath78 .
we define @xmath79 , then the energy is determined by the angular momentum @xmath80 and the potential @xmath81 , which is shown in fig.1 .
the particle dynamics corresponds to the oscillation of the size of spin - vortex pair ( fig.2 ) .
we generalize the one - pair skyrmion to many - skyrmion gas .
the action is written as @xmath82,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath83 are constants and @xmath84 indicate both @xmath43 and @xmath44 : @xmath85 .
@xmath83 are given by integrals in terms of @xmath32 and show logarithmic divergence @xmath86 for the cutoff @xmath87 of the order of the system size .
when we take into account only the divergent term @xmath86 , @xmath88 are constants . in this case , the kinetic term is simply @xmath89 this means that the kinetic term is only concerned with the movement of centers of @xmath6-particles and @xmath75-particles .
this term is expected to be unimportant and we neglect it .
hence , the model is reduced to the coulomb gas model without the kinetic term
. then we use the static approximation as a first step . under this approximation ,
the action is @xmath90.\ ] ] this yields that the transition from the plasma phase to the molecular phase occurs at @xmath91@xcite : @xmath92 therefore , there is a kosterlitz - thouless transition in the ( 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model .
we have formulated skyrmion ( instanton ) gas picture for the two - dimensional quantum antiferromagnet on the basis of the ( 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model .
we have shown that there is a kosterlitz - thouless transition from the plasma phase to the molecular phase as the temperature is lowered by using a static approximation to the instanton gas . in the molecular phase two instantons form a bound state , namely , a dipole of two spin vortices .
we expect that this is related to the pairing mechanism of superconductivity in doped antiferromagnets .
9 k. h. bennemann and j. b. ketterson eds . : _ the physics of superconductors _ ( springer - verlag , berlin , 2004 ) . t. suzuki , t. goto , k. chiba , t. shinoda , t. fukase , h. kimura , k. yamada , m. ohashi , and y. yamaguchi : phys .
rev . b*57 * ( 1998 ) 3229 .
m. fujita , h. goka , t. adachi , y. koike , and k. yamada : physica c*426 * -*431 * ( 2005 ) 257 .
j. m. tranquada , j. d. axe , n. ichikawa , y. nakamura , s. uchida , and b. nachumi : phys .
rev . b*54 * ( 1996 ) 7489 .
j. e. hoffman , e. w. hudson , k. m. lang , v. madhavan , h. eisaki , s. uchida , and j. c. davis : science * 295 * ( 2002 ) 466 .
w. d. wise , m. c. boyer , k. chatterjee , t. kondo , t. takeuchi , h. ikuta , y. wang , and e. w. hudson : nature phys .
* 4 * ( 2008 ) 696 .
t. hanaguri , c. lupien , y. kohsaka , d. h. lee , m. azuma , m. takano , h. takagi , and j. c. davis : nature * 430 * ( 2004 ) 1001 .
t. yanagisawa , s. koike , m. miyazaki , and k. yamaji : j. phys .
matter * 14 * ( 2002 ) 21 .
m. miyazaki , t. yanagisawa , and k. yamaji : j. phys .
* 73 * ( 2004 ) 1643 ; t. yanagisawa , m. miyazaki and k. yamaji : j. phys .
* 78 * ( 2009 ) 013706 .
m. miyazaki , k. yamaji , t. yanagisawa , and r. kadono : j. phys .
* 78 * ( 2009 ) 043706 .
a. m. polyakov : phys .
lett . b*59 * ( 1975 ) 79 .
e. brezin and j. zinn - justin : phys .
rev . b*14 * ( 1976 ) 3110 .
w. a. bardeen , b. w. lee , and e. r. shrock : phys .
d*14 * ( 1976 ) 985 .
s. chakravarty , b. i. halperin and d. r. nelson : phys .
rev . b*39 * ( 1989 ) 2344 .
t. yanagisawa : phys .
rev . b*46 * ( 1992 ) 13896 .
a. a. belavin and a. m. polyakov : jetp lett .
* 22 * ( 1975 ) 245 .
a. jevicki : nucl .
phys . b*127 * ( 1977 ) 125 .
a. dadda , m. lscher , and p. di vecchia : nucl .
phys . b*146 * ( 1978 ) 63 .
a. m. polyakov : _ gauge fields and strings _ ( harwood academic publisher , switerland , 1987 ) . h. koizumi : cond - mat/0506747 .
t. morinari : phys .
rev . b*73 * ( 2006 ) 064504 .
i. v. frolov and a. s. schwarz : jetp lett .
* 28 * ( 1978 ) 249 .
v. a. fateev , i. v. frolov and a. s. schwarz : nucl .
phys . b*154 * ( 1979 ) 1 .
b.berg and m. lscher : commun .
* 69 * ( 1979 ) 57 .
|
important understand magnetic structure of two - dimensional antiferromagnetic in light - doping region cuprate high - temperature superconductors physics of underdoped region related to pseudogap state not clear influence doping holes on antiferromagnetic state parent materials cuprate superconductors interesting found stripe order stabilized in underdoped region la@xmath0nd@xmath1sr@xmath4sr@xmath4ba checkerboard - like charge density modulation with @xmath5 period @xmath6 lattice spacing observed by scanning tunneling microscopy experiments in bi@xmath7sr@xmath7o@xmath8@xmath7sr@xmath4la ca@xmath4na@xmath10) modulated structures understood correlated electrons variational monte carlo method for two - dimensional hubbard model expected new state in light - doping region charge modulated structures stripes checkerboards instable spin - modulations spin - vortex state formulated purpose paper investigate spin - vortex excitation two - dimensional quantum antiferromagnet paper two - dimensional magnet nonlinear sigma model renormalization properties applied ferromagnets two dimensions nonlinear sigma model continuum limit isotropic ferromagnet action @xmath11 three - component scalar field @xmath12 condition @xmath13 two - dimensional quantum heisenberg antiferromagnet mapped 2 + 1 ) dimensional nonlinear sigma model sigma model @xmath15 three - component scalar field sphere @xmath16 parameters @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 coupling constant antiferromagnetic nearest - neighbor interaction @xmath22 magnitude spin lattice spacing two - dimensional case @xmath23 change scale @xmath24 by @xmath25 action @xmath26 defined two - space dimensions @xmath23 @xmath28 @xmath22 replaced by @xmath29 @xmath30 dimensionless scaling field variables @xmath31 @xmath24 model describes nambu - goldstone mode spin - wave mode quantum antiferromagnetic model renormalization wilson - kogut renormalization methodhole doping rate small nonlinear sigma model relevant coupling constant @xmath30 renormalized doping effect model light - doping case 2d nonlinear sigma model instanton solution @xcite skyrmion@xcite excitation spin - vortex type quantum fluctuations instantons computed reduced study coulomb gas@xcite gas instantons in plasma phase spin - vortex excitations independent form dimers two - dimensional classical heisenberg model question picture correct for ( 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model ? generalize instanton gas approximation to 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model parametrization field @xmath15 single complex field @xmath32 : @xmath33 @xmath34 complex conjugate @xmath32 complex variable @xmath35 for @xmath36 action written as @xmath37 @xmath38 is @xmath39 solution @xmath40 instanton solution typical instanton solution @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 indicate positions vortex - like excitations antiferromagnetic spin order local structure interpreted as skyrmion @xmath43 @xmath44 have @xmath24-dependence@xmath43 @xmath44 constants @xmath38 integer number equal to @xmath41 @xmath49 @xmath50 continuous function @xmath24 @xmath51 continuous function @xmath24 @xmath52 @xmath38 integer action as @xmath53 fluctuation effect partition function evaluated 2d nonlinear sigma model@xcite @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 constant factor of @xmath32 model classical coulomb gas logarithmic interaction contribution functional integral changing variable @xmath32 to @xmath43 generalized present model measure @xmath57 formula consider one - instanton state @xmath58 set @xmath59 obtain @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 limit @xmath66 @xmath67 spin vortices antiferromagnetic spin order @xmath68 spin disorder region @xmath68 @xmath69 action eq.(9 as @xmath70 @xmath71 constant depends on @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 complex conjugates of @xmath6 @xmath75 replace @xmath30 by @xmath76 dimensionless add fluctuation effect obtain @xmath77. model single particle logarithmic potential set @xmath78define @xmath79 energy determined by angular momentum @xmath80 potential @xmath81 shown fig.1 particle dynamics corresponds oscillation size spin - vortex pair fig.2 generalize one - pair skyrmion to many - skyrmion gas action written as @xmath82 @xmath83 constants @xmath84 indicate @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath85 @xmath83 integrals @xmath32 logarithmic divergence @xmath86 cutoff @xmath87 system size divergent term @xmath86 @xmath88 constants kinetic term @xmath89 movement centers @xmath6 @xmath75-particles model reduced coulomb gas model without kinetic term use static approximation first step action is @xmath90 transition from plasma to molecular phase at @xmath91 @xmath92 kosterlitz - thouless transition in ( 2 + 1)d nonlinear sigma model formulated skyrmion instanton gas picture two - dimensional quantum antiferromagnet shown kosterlitz - thouless transition from plasma to molecular phase temperature lowered static approximation molecular phase two instantons form bound state dipole of two spin vorticesexpect related pairing mechanism superconductivity doped antiferromagnets bennemann b ketterson physics superconductors springer - verlag berlin 2004 ). suzuki goto chiba shinoda fukase kimura yamada ohashi yamaguchi . rev . b*57 * 1998 ) 3229 fujita goka adachi koike yamada c*426 * -*431 * 2005 ) 257 . tranquada. axe ichikawa nakamura uchida nachumi . rev . b*54 * 1996 ) 7489 hoffman hudson lang madhavan eisaki uchida j c. davis science * 295 * 2002 ) 466. wise . boyer chatterjee kondo takeuchi ikuta wang hudson nature phys . 4 ( 2008 ) 696. hanaguri lupien kohsaka. lee azuma takano takagi j c. davis nature * 430 * 2004 ) 1001 yanagisawa koike miyazaki yamaji phys . matter * 14 * 2002 ) 21 miyazakiyanagisawa yamaji . 73 2004 ) 1643 yanagisawa miyazaki yamaji 78 2009 ) 013706 miyazaki yamaji yanagisawa kadono 2009 043706 polyakov. b*59 1975 ) 79 brezin zinn - justin . rev b*14 1976 ) 3110 bardeen lee shrock phys*14 1976 ) 985 chakravarty halperin nelson . rev b*39 1989 ) 2344 yanagisawa phys b*46 1992 ) 13896 belavin polyakov jetp lett 22 1975 ) 245 jevicki nucl phys . b*127 1977 ) 125 dadda lscher p. di vecchia nucl phys . b*146 1978 ) 63 polyakov gauge fields strings harwood academic publisher switerland 1987 ) koizumi cond - mat/0506747 morinari phys . rev b*73 2006 ) 064504 v. frolov a s. schwarz jetp lett 28 1978 ) 249. fateev frolov a s schwarz nucl 1979 ) 1 b.berg lscher commun 69 1979 ) 57
| 0.494358
| 3,229
| 1,708
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,629
|
the precise measurements of the @xmath0 oscillation frequency and the limit on the @xmath1 one as well as the determination of the cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa matrix element @xmath2 improve the constraints on the other elements of this matrix .
a fit to the experimental data and the theory calculations leads to the determination of the vertex of the unitarity triangle as : @xmath3 the values of its angles , in their customary definition in terms of sines for @xmath4 and @xmath5 , are found to be : @xmath6 indirect information on non - perturbative qcd parameters , on the presence of a cp violating complex phase in the ckm matrix and on the @xmath1 oscillation frequency are also extracted .
european organization for nuclear research cern - ep/98 - 133 + august , 21 1998 + * indirect measurement of the vertex and angles of the unitarity triangle * * salvatore mele * + cern , ch1211 , genve 23 , switzerland _ to be submitted to physics letters b _
|
the standard model @xcite of the electroweak interactions predicts a mixing of the quark mass eigenstates with the weak interaction ones .
this mixing is described by the cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa@xcite ( ckm ) matrix .
four real parameters describe this @xmath7 unitary matrix @xcite : @xmath8 as @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 are of order unity , and @xmath12 is chosen as the sine of the cabibbo angle , this parametrisation shows immediately the hierarchy of the couplings of the quarks in the charged current part of the standard model lagrangian .
moreover in this parametrisation the parameter @xmath11 is the complex phase of the matrix and is thus directly related to the known violation of the cp symmetry produced by the weak interactions .
the measurement of the parameters of the ckm matrix is thus of fundamental importance for both the precision description of the weak interaction of quarks and the investigation of the mechanism of cp violation .
the parameters @xmath9 and @xmath12 are known with an accuracy of a few percent and the determination of @xmath10 and @xmath11 is the subject of this letter .
a large number of physical processes can be parametrised in terms of the values of the elements of the ckm matrix , together with other parameters of theoretical and experimental origin .
four of them show good sensitivity for the indirect determination of @xmath10 and @xmath11 and are discussed in what follows .
a fit based on this information has been performed , as suggested in @xcite , and its results are presented below . as it is well known
the measurement of @xmath10 and @xmath11 is equivalent to the determination of the only unknown vertex and the angles of a triangle in the @xmath13 plane whose other two vertices are in ( 0,0 ) and ( 1,0 ) .
figure 1 shows this triangle , called the unitarity triangle .
the value of the sine of the cabibbo angle is known with a good accuracy @xcite as : @xmath14 the parameter @xmath9 depends on @xmath12 and on the ckm matrix element @xmath15 . using the value @xcite : @xmath16
it can be extracted : @xmath17 the mass eigenstates of the neutral kaons can be written as @xmath18 and @xmath19 .
the relation @xmath20 implies the violation of cp that , in the wu - yang phase convention @xcite , is described by the parameter @xmath21 defined as : @xmath22 the precise measurements of the @xmath23 and @xmath24 decay rates imply @xcite : @xmath25 the relation of @xmath26 to the ckm matrix parameters is @xcite : @xmath27 .
\label{equation : ek}\ ] ] the functions @xmath28 and @xmath29 of the variables @xmath30 and @xmath31 are given by @xcite : @xmath32 from the value of the mass of the top quark reported by the cdf and d0 collaborations @xcite , @xmath33 , and the scaling proposed in @xcite one obtains : while the mass of the charm quark is @xcite : @xmath35 the current values of the parameters that include the calculated qcd corrections are @xcite : @xmath36 the largest theoretical uncertainty which affects this constraint is that on the `` bag '' parameter @xmath37 , that reflects non - perturbative qcd contributions to the process . using the value of the jlqcd collaboration @xcite , @xmath38 , with a calculation similar to that reported in @xcite the value used in the following can be derived as : @xmath39 neutral mesons containing a @xmath41 quark show a behaviour similar to neutral kaons .
the heavy and light mass eigenstates , @xmath42 and @xmath43 respectively , are different from the cp eigenstates @xmath0 and @xmath44 : @xmath45 is the key feature of the physics while the lifetime difference dominates the effects in the neutral kaon system .
this mass difference can be measured by means of the study of the oscillations of one cp eigenstate into the other .
the high precision world average is @xcite : @xmath46 the relation of @xmath47 with the ckm parameters , making use of the standard model description of the box diagrams that give rise to the mixing and the parametrisation ( [ equation : ckm ] ) of the ckm matrix , reads : @xmath48 .
\label{equation : dmd}\ ] ] the function @xmath29 is given by ( [ equation : f2 ] ) , the value of the calculated qcd correction @xmath49 is @xcite : @xmath50 and the equivalent of the @xmath37 parameter for the kaon system , @xmath51 , is taken as @xcite : @xmath52 @xmath1 mesons are believed to undergo a mixing analogous to the @xmath0 ones .
their larger mass difference @xmath55 is responsible for oscillations that are faster than the @xmath0 ones , and have thus still eluded direct observation .
a lower limit has been set by the lep b oscillation working group combining the results of the searches performed by the lep experiments with a contribution from the sld and cdf collaborations , as @xcite : @xmath56 the expression for @xmath55 in the standard model is similar to that for @xmath47 . from the ratio of these two expressions the value of @xmath55 can be written as : @xmath57 where all the theoretical uncertainties are included in the quantity @xmath58 , known as @xcite : @xmath59 the three constraints described above are all affected by a large theoretical uncertainty on some of the parameters that enter their expression , namely @xmath37 , @xmath51 and @xmath58 . a determination of either @xmath2 or the ratio @xmath60 allows a more sensitive constraint not relaying on any non - perturbative qcd calculation .
it follows from the ckm matrix parametrisation of ( [ equation : ckm ] ) that : @xmath61 the cleo collaboration has measured this ratio by means of the endpoint of inclusive @xcite charmless semileptonic b decays as : @xmath62 .
the aleph and l3 collaborations have recently measured at lep the inclusive charmless semileptonic branching fraction of beauty hadrons , @xmath63 , from which the value of @xmath2 can be extracted @xcite as : @xmath64 the experimental results are :
|
standard model @xcite electroweak interactions predicts mixing quark mass eigenstates with weak interaction ones mixing described by cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa@xcite matrix four parameters describe @xmath7 matrix @xmath8 unity @xmath12 sine of cabibbo angle parametrisation shows hierarchy couplings quarks in charged current model parameter @xmath11 complex phase matrix related to violation cp symmetry weak interactions measurement parameters ckm matrix for precision description weak interaction investigation mechanism cp violation parameters @xmath9 @xmath12 known accuracy few percent determination of @xmath10 @xmath11 subject of letter physical processes can parametrised values elements ckm matrix other parameters four show sensitivity for indirect determination of @xmath10 and @xmath11 discussed fit based on information performed results presented below measurement of @xmath10 and @xmath11 equivalent to determination of unknown vertex angles of triangle in @xmath13 plane other two vertices ( 0,0 ) and ( 1,0 ) figure 1 shows triangle called unitarity trianglevalue sine cabibbo angle known @xmath14 parameter @xmath9 depends on @xmath12 ckm matrix element @xmath15 using value @xcite : @xmath16 extracted @xmath17 mass eigenstates neutral kaons written @xmath18 @xmath19 relation @xmath20 implies violation cp described parameter @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 decay rates imply @xcite : @xmath25 relation @xmath26 to ckm matrix parameters @xcite : @xmath27 functions @xmath28 @xmath29 variables @xmath30 @xmath31 given by @xcite : @xmath32 mass top quark cdf d0 collaborations mass charm quark @xcite : @xmath35 current values parameters calculated qcd corrections are @xcite : @xmath36 largest theoretical uncertainty bag parameter @xmath37 non - perturbative qcd contributions value jlqcd collaboration @xmath38 value derived as @xmath39 neutral mesons @xmath41 quark show behaviour similar neutral kaonsheavy light mass eigenstates @xmath42 @xmath43 different from cp eigenstates @xmath0 @xmath44 @xmath45 key feature physics lifetime difference dominates effects neutral kaon system mass difference measured oscillations one cp eigenstate high precision world average is @xcite : @xmath46 relation of @xmath47 with ckm parameters standard model description matrix reads : @xmath48 function @xmath29 given by equation f2 value calculated qcd correction @xmath49 is @xcite : @xmath50 equivalent of @xmath37 parameter system @xmath51 as @xcite : @xmath52 @xmath1 mesons mixing analogous to @xmath0 larger mass difference @xmath55 responsible for oscillations faster than eluded direct observation lower limit set by lep b oscillation working group sld cdf collaborations : @xmath56 expression for @xmath55 standard model similar to @xmath47ratio expressions value @xmath55 written @xmath57 theoretical uncertainties included quantity @xmath58 @xcite @xmath59 three constraints affected large theoretical uncertainty parameters @xmath37 @xmath51 @xmath58 determination @xmath2 or ratio @xmath60 allows sensitive constraint non - perturbative qcd calculation ckm matrix parametrisation @xmath61 cleo collaboration measured ratio endpoint inclusive @xcite charmless semileptonic decays @xmath62 aleph l3 collaborations measured inclusive charmless semileptonic branching fraction beauty hadrons @xmath63 value @xmath2 extracted @xmath64 experimental results
| 0.259275
| 1,477
| 780
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,633
|
considering a double - barrier structure formed by a silicon quantum dot covered by natural oxide , we derive simple conditions for the conductance of the dot to become a step - like function of the number of doping atoms inside the dot , with negligible dependence on the actual position of the dopants .
the found conditions are feasible in experimentally available structures .
* quantum mott transition in a silicon quantum dot * s. v. vyshenski , u. zeitler , and r. j. haug + institute of nuclear physics , moscow state university , moscow 119899 , russia + institut fr festkrperphysik , universitt hannover , appelstr .
2 , d-30167 hannover , germany february 21 , 1998 the fabrication of @xmath0 nanostructures became possible through very recently developed new technologies @xcite .
one unique preparation technology for individual silicon quantum dots ( sqd ) has been reported in @xcite .
they are spherical @xmath0 particles with diameters @xmath1 in the range 512 nm covered by a 12 nm - thick natural @xmath2 film .
metallic current terminals made from degenerately doped @xmath0 are defined lithographically to touch each individual dot from above and from below . to ensure metallic electrodes
the donor concentration @xmath3 should be @xmath4 , where @xmath5 @xmath6 .
the critical concentration @xmath7 is defined by the _
mott criterion _
@xcite , introducing the transition to a metallic type of conductivity in a semiconductor at : @xmath8 where @xmath9 nm is the bohr radius of an electron bound to a donor inside the @xmath0 crystal , in the case of phosphorus - donors @xmath10 nm @xcite . as for the doping of the dot ,
the situation concerning a mott transition in that small dots is much less trivial than the one described by eq .
( [ mott ] ) .
let us consider dots with diameters @xmath11 nm formed from n - doped @xmath0 with @xmath12 as an illustrative example .
then each dot contains in average one donor .
note that we will consider degenerately @xmath13-doped electrodes with @xmath14 which ensures metallic conduction up to the borders of the dot .
real fabrication technology @xcite provides a wafer with hundreds of sqds on it with current leads towards each individual sqd .
dots in average have the same value of mean dopant concentration @xmath3 , which is determined by the parent material of bulk silicon the dots are formed from .
however , on the level of each individual sqd we will always have exactly _ integer _ number of doping atoms .
if , as in the example above , the average number of dopants @xmath15 the actual number of donors in the dot can have values @xmath16 , with values larger than these very unlikely .
our objective is to illustrate , that sqds from the same wafer fall into several distinct sets of approximately the same conductance .
the typical value of conductance for each set is nearly completely determined by the number @xmath17 of donors present in a certain part of a sqd so that @xmath17 labels each set of sqds . summarizing the above , we need for a quantization of the conduction through a dot with @xmath17 donors the following conditions : * size @xmath1 of the dot comparable with bohr radius : @xmath18 . *
average doping @xmath3 of the dot @xmath19 , leading to a mean number of dopants @xmath20 , so that @xmath21 are the most probable configurations of an individual sqd . *
doping of the electrodes @xmath22 , so that current leads are perfectly metallic . * dot covered by an oxide layer thick enough to suppress ballistic transport through the dot .
in fact all these condition can be simultaneously satisfied for sqd fabricated with the method mentioned above @xcite .
|
we use a simple model of a cubic sqd with @xmath23 ( we will use @xmath11 nm for estimates ) , covered with an oxide layer with thickness @xmath24 nm , and contacted with current terminals from below and from above .
the @xmath25-axis is oriented from top to bottom along the current flow , as shown in fig . 1 .
a tunneling current is injected into the dot via the oxide barrier from the top ( source at @xmath26 ) and leaves the dot at the bottom ( drain at @xmath27 ) . due to the presence of the oxide barriers
this current is non - ballistic and non - thermal .
we assume that the high potential barriers associated with the oxide layers are not much affected by the voltage and the tunneling charges .
we concentrate on what happens between these effective source and drain ( fig .
2 ) . in the case
when the dot can be regarded as an insulating system it is reasonable to assume that the applied voltage equally drops over the potential barriers and the dots . for simplicity
we neglect the difference of the dielectric constants of the oxide barriers and the dot . in this approximation
we can introduce an effective voltage @xmath28 describing the part of the total transport voltage @xmath29 applied between effective source and drain which drops across the dot itself . in this rude approximation
we neglect the effect of spatial quantization upon values on the ionization energy , the conductivity gap and material parameters of silicon .
at @xmath30 the fermi level inside the dot is situated in the middle of the gap , i.e. @xmath31 bellow the conduction band edge ( @xmath32 ev at 300 k ) .
as @xmath33 grows , the bottom of the ( still empty ) conduction band bends down accordingly .
when the conduction band in the dot close to the drain aligns with the fermi level of the emitter we expect a drastic increase in the tunneling current . this threshold @xmath34 voltage ( fig .
2 ) for @xmath33 is given by @xmath35 , regardless of the number @xmath36 of dopants in the dot ( as long as the dot is not yet metallic , of course ) .
in the following we therefore limit our studies to voltages @xmath37 in this voltage range we have a @xmath1-thick barrier ( formed by the dot ) with always finite hight between effective source and drain . the intrinsic concentration of electrons and holes at 300 k is @xmath38 @xmath6 .
even at this high temperature the probability to have at least one intrinsic electron in a dot with size @xmath11 nm is only @xmath39 .
so we would expect virtually no current in this mode .
this is confirmed by direct electrical tests @xcite of sqd with the required properties .
let us now consider one single single donor in the dot located at @xmath25 with ionization energy @xmath40 ev ( for p as a donor ) .
the evident channel for current flow is single - electron tunneling from the source to the empty impurity , and then from populated impurity to the drain .
this channel opens as soon as @xmath33 reaches a threshold @xmath41 leading to a step - like increase in the total conductance of the dot .
if the impurity is located near the drain , i.e. @xmath42 ( as donor 1 in fig .
2 ) , then @xmath41 is given by @xmath43 in contrast , for an impurity located at distances @xmath44 from the drain ( i.e. further away than the threshold case of donor 2 in fig .
2 ) , no additional current channel via a single impurity can be opened at low enough voltages defined in ( [ threshold ] ) where virtually no background current is present . in the present case
this value @xmath45 nm , which returns us to the above criterion : only impurities located in the immediate vicinity ( defined within the accuracy @xmath9 ) of the drain contribute to the single - impurity channel .
the probability to populate an impurity from the source , and then to depopulate it towards the drain is directly related to the overlap of the atom - like impurity wave - functions with the corresponding contacts leading to a conductance @xmath46 of this current channel @xmath47 this shows that in first approximation the conductance of this channel does not depend on @xmath25 . as shown above , a single - impurity channel already only selects impurities located within a very narrow range of @xmath25 close to the drain , eq .
( [ g1 ] ) gives an additional argument for the independence of this channel conductance @xmath46 on the actual location of the impurity inside this thin layer near the drain .
the above consideration shows , that due to the bend of the bottom of conduction band following the transport voltage , there is no chance to notice current flowing through a sequential chain of impurities ( such as donors 1 and 3 in fig .
2 ) , connecting source and drain .
the contribution of such a chain will be totally masked by the current flowing directly via the conduction band .
the only way for multiple impurities to manifest themselves in quantized conductance is to form multiple _ parallel _ singe - impurity channels situated close enough to the drain as considered above .
therefore , if @xmath48 impurities fall into the thin layer near the drain to approximately the same @xmath25 coordinate as that of donor 1 in fig .
2 ( within the bohr radius ) , we will see a switching - on of an @xmath17-fold channel with conductance @xmath49 at the same threshold voltage @xmath50 v as for a single - donor channels .
all the above considerations are only valid as long as the dot itself can be regarded as an insulating system .
as the number of donors in a sqd grows , the dot becomes a metallic particle , and the conduction band edge in the dot aligns with the fermi level of the electrodes . in a very simple estimate
we define this transition to a metal when the total volume of @xmath17 donors with an individual volume of @xmath51 exceeds the volume of the dot .
this is an exaggerated version of the mott criterion ( [ mott ] ) which holds not only in bulk , but in a small structure , too . for the analyzed example from above this
gives @xmath52 as a limiting value .
the practically interesting set @xmath53 for both @xmath36 and @xmath17 considered above is still far bellow this limit .
quite a number of other mechanisms of electron transport might take place in this system , the main one being resonant tunneling .
surprisingly , even taking into account such other mechanisms @xcite does not change much the main idea of the present paper .
useful discussions with m. kupriyanov and s. oda are gratefully acknowledged .
this work was supported in part by the russian foundation for basic research and by the russian program for future nanonelectronic devices .
a. dutta , m. kimura , y. honda , m. otobe , a. itoh , and s. oda , _ jpn .
_ , * 35 * , p. 4038
+ s. vyshenski , a. ohata , y. kinugasa , y. hayafune , h. hara , s .-
lee , k. nishiguchi , a. dutta , s. oda .
active probing of single - electron effects in a silicon quantum dot .
_ 4-th int . symp . on quantum effect electronics _ ,
p. 45 - 50 , tokyo ( 1997 ) .
|
use model cubic sqd @xmath23 @xmath11 nm estimates covered oxide layer @xmath24 nm contacted current terminals below above @xmath25-axis oriented top to bottom along current flow shown fig . 1 tunneling current injected into dot via oxide barrier top source @xmath26 leaves dot bottom drain @xmath27 oxide barriers current non - ballistic non - thermal high potential barriers oxide layers not affected by voltage tunneling charges concentrate between effective source drain fig . 2 ) dot insulating system applied voltage equally drops over potential barriers dots neglect difference dielectric constants oxide barriers dot introduce effective voltage @xmath28 part total transport voltage @xmath29 between source drain drops across dot neglect effect spatial quantization ionization energy conductivity gap material parameters silicon @xmath30 fermi level dot middle gap bellow conduction band edge @xmath32 300 k @xmath33 grows bottom conduction band bends down conduction band dot drain aligns with fermi level emitter expect drastic increase tunneling current threshold @xmath34 voltage fig .@xmath33 given by @xmath35 regardless of number @xmath36 dopants in dot not metallic limit studies to voltages @xmath37 @xmath1-thick barrier formed by dot finite hight between source and drain intrinsic concentration of electrons holes at 300 k is @xmath38 @xmath6 at high temperature probability one intrinsic electron in dot with size @xmath11 nm is only @xmath39 virtually no current mode confirmed by electrical tests @xcite sqd with required properties consider one single donor in dot at @xmath25 with ionization energy @xmath40 ev channel for current flow is single - electron tunneling from source to empty impurity impurity to drain channel opens @xmath33 reaches threshold @xmath41 increase in total conductance dot if impurity near drain @xmath42 @xmath41 given by @xmath43 impurity at distances @xmath44 from drain further no additional current channel opened at low voltages virtually no background current value @xmath45 nm only impurities in immediate vicinity of drain contribute to single - impurity channelprobability to populate impurity from source depopulate towards drain related to overlap atom - impurity wave - functions contacts leading to conductance @xmath46 of channel @xmath47 conductance depend on @xmath25 single - impurity channel selects impurities narrow range of @xmath25 close to drain argument for independence channel conductance on location impurity inside layer near drain due to bend bottom conduction band transport voltage no chance notice current flowing through sequential chain of impurities donors 1 3 connecting source drain contribution chain masked by current flowing via conduction band multiple impurities manifest form multiple parallel singe - impurity channels close to drain if @xmath48 impurities fall into thin layer near drain to same @xmath25 coordinate as donor 1 switching - on of @xmath17-fold channel with conductance @xmath49 at same threshold voltage @xmath50 v as single - donor channels considerations valid dot insulating system as number of donors in sqd grows dot becomes metallic particle conduction band edge aligns with fermi level electrodestransition to metal when total volume @xmath17 donors individual volume @xmath51 exceeds volume dot exaggerated mott criterion holds bulk small structure gives @xmath52 limiting value @xmath53 for @xmath36 and @xmath17 bellow limit other mechanisms electron transport main resonant tunneling @xcite change main idea paper discussions with m. kupriyanov s. oda acknowledged work supported by russian foundation for basic research russian program for future nanonelectronic devices a. dutta m. kimura y. honda m. otobe. itoh s. oda jpn . 35 p. 4038 s. vyshenski ohata kinugasa hayafune h hara lee nishiguchi dutta s oda probing of single - electron effects in silicon quantum dot 4-th int . symp . on quantum effect electronics p. 45 - 50 tokyo 1997 )
| 0.26724
| 1,663
| 852
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,635
|
following @xcite , we explore the parameter space of the case when the supersymmetry ( susy ) breaking scale is lower , for example , in gauge mediated susy breaking model . during inflation
, the form of the potential is @xmath0 plus mssm ( or a - term ) inflation .
we show that the model works for a wide range of the potential @xmath0 with the soft susy breaking mass @xmath1 tev .
the implication to mssm ( or a - term ) inflation is that the flat directions which is lifted by the non - renormalizable terms described by the superpotential @xmath2 with @xmath3 and @xmath4 are also suitable to be an inflaton field for @xmath5 provided there is an additional false vacuum term @xmath0 with appropriate magnitude .
the flat directions corresponds to @xmath6 also works for @xmath7 .
|
inflation @xcite ( for review , @xcite ) is an vacuum - dominated epoch in the early universe when the scale factor grew exponentially .
this scenario is used to set the initial condition for the hot big bang model and to provide the primordial density perturbation as the seed of structure formation . in the framework of slow - roll inflation ,
the slow - roll parameters are defined by @xmath8 @xmath9 where @xmath10 is the reduced planck mass .
the spectral index can be expressed in terms of the slow - roll parameters as @xmath11 the latest wmap 5-year result prefers the spectral index around @xmath12 @xcite .
the spectrum is given by @xmath13 with the slow - roll approximation the value of the inflaton field @xmath14 , in order to achieve @xmath15 e - folds inflation , is @xmath16 from observation @xcite @xmath17 at @xmath18 ( we call this cmb ( cosmic microwave background ) normalization ) .
the scalar potential for the inflaton field @xmath14 of supernatural inflation @xcite ( during inflation ) is @xmath19 where @xmath20 is the susy breaking scale with @xmath21 gev and the second term is the soft mass term with @xmath22 tev in order to address the hierarchy problem of the standard model ( sm ) .
supernatural inflation is very attractive but predicts the spectral index @xmath23 . in @xcite ,
a model is proposed with the potential includes the a - term and non - renormalizable terms @xmath24 where @xmath25 for the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) @xcite . when @xmath26 is the gravity mediated susy breaking scale it is shown that the spectral index can naturally be @xmath12 , because the potential is naturally of a hilltop form ( so called hilltop inflation @xcite ) .
the soft mass @xmath27 is related to @xmath26 via @xmath28 where @xcite @xmath29 as we can see from eq .
( [ eq3 ] ) , for gravity - mediated susy breaking , @xmath30 gev . for gauge
mediated susy breaking , @xmath26 can be as low as @xmath31 tev . from eq .
( [ eq1 ] ) , it is clear that the original model of supernatural inflation can not work for lower @xmath26 .
however , for the model eq .
( [ eq2 ] ) , it certainly can .
the reason is even if we have @xmath32 the potential still can accommodate for a successful inflation model if inflation occurs near a saddle point where @xmath33 , and it is called mssm inflation or a - term inflation in the literature @xcite . in this paper , we will explore the parameter space for a successful inflation model from eq .
( [ eq2 ] ) near a saddle point with a wide range of @xmath0 from @xmath34 tev to @xmath35 gev .
the paper is organized as follows .
we present the calculation and result in section [ 2 ] .
our conclusions are summarized in section [ 3 ] .
as in the case of mssm inflation , the potential ( eq .
( [ eq2 ] ) ) has a saddle point where @xmath33 if @xmath27 and @xmath36 are related via @xmath37 the saddle point is at @xmath38 where @xmath39 the potential at the saddle point is @xmath40 near the saddle point , the potential can be described as @xmath41 where @xmath42 from eq .
( [ efolds ] ) , the number of e - folds is @xmath43 the slow roll parameters @xmath44 and @xmath45 are @xmath46 @xmath47 inflation ends when @xmath48 .
the spectral index is ( for @xmath49 ) @xmath50 which is the same as a - term inflation .
the spectrum is give by @xmath51 after impose cmb normalization ( @xmath52 ) for @xmath53 tev , we obtain the relation between @xmath0 and @xmath54 .
we show the result on fig .
( [ result ] ) . and @xmath54 .
here we assume @xmath55 tev.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] as we can see from fig .
( [ result ] ) , for @xmath56 , the predictions is just the same as mssm ( or a - term ) inflation .
actually the lower bound can go down to zero , and recovers mssm ( or a - term ) inflation . for @xmath57 ,
the existence of @xmath0 allows also @xmath3 and @xmath4 to fit cmb normalization with @xmath58 . for @xmath3 , from eq .
( [ eq4 ] ) , we have @xmath59 , corresponds to @xmath60 .
similarly , @xmath4 corresponds to @xmath61 .
in this paper , we generalize the model of @xcite by considering smaller @xmath0 .
our model is similar to hybrid inflation because the additional @xmath0 which eventually should gracefully exist by a waterfall field .
however , it is different from the usual hybrid inflation because inflation occurs near a saddle point .
the result is for @xmath62 and @xmath1 tev , the @xmath6 flat direction can works with @xmath63 .
the @xmath3 and @xmath4 flat directions can also play the role of an inflaton field with appropriate @xmath0 .
this work was supported in part by the nsc under grant no .
nsc 96 - 2628-m-007 - 002-my3 , by the ncts , and by the boost program of nthu .
this work is also supported in parts by the wcu program through the kosef funded by the mest ( r31 - 2008 - 000 - 10057 - 0 ) .
we are grateful to david lyth and kazunori kohri for discussions .
a. h. guth , phys .
d * 23 * , 347 ( 1981 ) .
d. h. lyth and a. riotto , phys .
rept . * 314 * , 1 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9807278 ] .
d. h. lyth , lect .
notes phys .
* 738 * , 81 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0702128 ] .
a. linde , lect .
notes phys .
* 738 * , 1 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0705.0164 [ hep - th ] ] .
l. randall , m. soljacic and a. h. guth , arxiv : hep - ph/9601296 . c. m. lin and k. cheung , arxiv:0901.3280 [ hep - ph ] .
t. gherghetta , c. f. kolda and s. p. martin , nucl .
b * 468 * , 37 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9510370 ] .
l. boubekeur and d. h. lyth , jcap * 0507 * , 010 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0502047 ] .
k. kohri , c. m. lin and d. h. lyth , jcap * 0712 * , 004 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv:0707.3826 [ hep - ph ] ] .
k. dimopoulos and d. h. lyth , phys .
d * 69 * , 123509 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0209180 ] .
r. allahverdi , k. enqvist , j. garcia - bellido and a. mazumdar , phys .
lett . * 97 * , 191304 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0605035 ] .
d. h. lyth , jcap * 0704 * , 006 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0605283 ] . j. c. bueno sanchez , k. dimopoulos and d. h. lyth , jcap * 0701 * , 015 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0608299 ] .
r. allahverdi , mod .
a * 23 * , 2799 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0812.3628 [ hep - ph ] ] .
|
inflation @xcite vacuum - dominated epoch early universe scale factor grew exponentially initial condition hot big bang model primordial density perturbation seed structure formation slow - roll inflation parameters defined by @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 reduced planck mass spectral index @xmath11 wmap 5-year result prefers spectral index around @xmath12 spectrum by @xmath13 slow - roll approximation value inflaton field @xmath14 @xmath15 e - inflation @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 cmb cosmic microwave background normalization scalar potential inflaton field @xmath14 supernatural inflation @xmath19 @xmath20 susy breaking scale @xmath21 gev soft mass term @xmath22 tev hierarchy problem standard model supernatural inflation predicts spectral index @xmath23 model proposed potential a - term non - renormalizable terms @xmath24 @xmath25 minimal supersymmetric standard model @xmath26 gravity mediated susy breaking scale spectral index @xmath12 hilltop form inflation soft mass @xmath27 related to @xmath26 via @xmath28 @xcite @xmath29eq3 ] gravity - mediated susy breaking @xmath30 gev gauge mediated susy breaking @xmath26 low as @xmath31 tev original model supernatural inflation work lower @xmath26 model eq2 can @xmath32 potential accommodate successful inflation model near saddle point @xmath33 called mssm inflation or a - term inflation paper explore parameter space successful inflation model near saddle point wide range @xmath0 from @xmath34 tev to @xmath35 gev paper organized calculation result section [ 2 ] conclusions summarized section [ 3 ] mssm inflation potential saddle point @xmath33 @xmath27 @xmath36 related via @xmath37 saddle point @xmath38 @xmath39 potential saddle point @xmath40 saddle potential described @xmath41 @xmath42 number e - @xmath43 slow roll parameters @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 inflation ends when @xmath48 spectral index @xmath49 ) @xmath50 same as a - term inflationspectrum by @xmath51 after cmb normalization @xmath52 ) @xmath53 relation between @xmath0 @xmath54 result on fig . @xmath54 assume @xmath55,scaledwidth=45.0% @xmath56 predictions same as mssm a - term inflation lower bound zero recovers mssm inflation @xmath57 @xmath0 allows @xmath3 @xmath4 fit cmb normalization with @xmath58 @xmath3 @xmath59 corresponds to @xmath60 @xmath4 corresponds @xmath61 generalize model @xcite smaller @xmath0 model similar to hybrid inflation additional @xmath0 waterfall field different from inflation inflation occurs near saddle point @xmath62 @xmath1 tev @xmath6 flat direction works with @xmath63 @xmath3 @xmath4 flat directions inflaton field with @xmath0 work supported by nsc grant 96 - 2628-m-007 - 002-my3 ncts boost program nthu supported wcu program kosef funded mest ( r31 - 2008 - 000 - 10057 - 0 ) grateful to david lyth kazunori kohri for discussionsguth phys 23 347 1981 ) d h lyth riotto phys 314 1999 ) hep - ph/9807278 h lyth 81 2008 ) hep - th/0702128 a linde 738 1 2008 ) arxiv:0705.0164 hep l. randall soljacic h guth hep - ph/9601296 m. lin k cheung arxiv:0901.3280 hep - ph gherghetta f. kolda p martin nucl 468 37 ( 1996 ) hep - ph/9510370 boubekeur d. h. lyth jcap 0507 010 2005 ) ph/0502047 k kohri m lin d h lyth jcap 0712 004 2007 ) arxiv:0707.3826 k dimopoulos d h. lyth phys 69 123509 2004 ) - ph/0209180 r allahverdi enqvist garcia - bellido mazumdar phys . 97 191304 ( 2006 ) hep - ph/0605035 d h lyth jcap 0704 006 ( 2007 ) hep - ph/0605283 sanchez dimopoulos d hlyth jcap 0701 015 2007 arxiv hep - ph/0608299 allahverdi 23 2799 2008 arxiv:0812.3628 hep - ph
| 0.310843
| 1,943
| 1,029
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,636
|
a simultaneous nlo qcd fit of the parton density functions ( pdfs ) of the proton and of the strong coupling @xmath0 is presented .
the analysis is based on combined h1 and zeus inclusive dis cross section measurements together with inclusive jet cross section measurements provided by both h1 and zeus collaborations .
the inclusion of the jet data significantly reduces the correlation between the gluon pdf and the strong coupling , improving the precision of the gluon pdf and providing an accurate determination of @xmath0 using dis data from hera only .
address= max - planck - institute fr physik , fhringer ring 6 , 80805 munich , germany@xmath1(mail:guenterg@desy.de )
|
the rutherford centennial is celebrating rutherford s discovery of the atomic nucleus in 1911 by scattering alpha - particles on a gold foil . since then scattering experiments have come a long way , improving the resolution from about @xmath2 times the proton radius ( @xmath3 fm ) in 1911 to about @xmath4 as achieved by the hera experiments @xcite at the so far only @xmath5 collider . here , i want to describe the current achievements in the extraction of the parton density functions ( pdfs ) of the proton and of the strong qcd coupling from inclusive and jet measurements in dis at hera .
inclusive neutral current ( nc ) and charged current ( cc ) measurements , in leading order ( lo ) represented by the quark - parton model , are sensitive to the valence and sea quarks of the proton . only at next - to - leading order ( nlo ) and beyond
do they become sensitive to the gluon density ( scaling violations ) and the strong coupling , which are however strongly correlated .
inclusive jets in dis , when measured for example in the breit frame , are sensitive to the gluon density and the strong coupling already in lo , via the boson - gluon fusion process .
this process dominates for the negative photon momentum transfer squared , or photon virtuality , @xmath6 , less than about @xmath7 gev@xmath8 . above that value
the qcd - compton process becomes dominant , providing sensitivity to the strong coupling without being correlated to the gluon .
therefore , one can expect that the addition of jet measurements to the hitherto mainly used inclusive measurements alone will allow a reduction of the correlation between the gluon density and the strong coupling , thereby making it possible to extract simultaneously both pdfs and the strong coupling from dis data .
the idea behind the herapdfs is to use only hera nc and cc data in the fits .
combined inclusive cross sections from the h1 and zeus experiments are used , which have increased precision due to statistics but also due to intercalibration effects made possible by the two complementary detectors .
thus , precise combined data sets with total uncertainties between @xmath9 ( for nc ) over most of the phase space are used .
the systematic correlated and uncorrelated errors are well controlled , such that the standard @xmath10 uncertainty criterion can be used .
since hera data only include @xmath11 data , there are no uncertainties due to for example deuterium or heavy target corrections .
two parametrizations have been studied : a @xmath12 parameter fit which was used for the published herapdf1.0 @xcite and for the preliminary herapdf1.5 @xcite , and a @xmath13 parameter fit , for the preliminary herapdf1.5f and herapdf1.6 @xcite .
the latter parametrization provides more flexibility , in particular for the gluon density at low @xmath14 , which is preferred because of the additional jet data . at the @xmath15
starting scale the pdfs are parametrized as follows : @xmath16 in the @xmath13 parameter fit @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 are constrained by the momentum and quark sum rules .
furthermore it is assumed that @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22 , where @xmath23 is the strange sea fraction at @xmath15 .
these choices define the central fit , as adding more parameters does not significantly reduce the @xmath24 .
the parametrization uncertainty is estimated by adding one additional parameter at a time , changing the parametrizations and varying the starting scale @xmath15 around the default value of @xmath25 gev@xmath8 .
a model uncertainty is determined by varying the heavy quark masses , @xmath23 and @xmath26 around their default values .
@xmath26 specifies the minimal @xmath6 for a data point to be included in the fit .
the fit of the pdfs is performed using the nlo dglap equations , employing the qcdnum @xcite evolution code .
charm and beauty quarks are treated as massive in the thorne - roberts variable - flavor - number scheme @xcite .
the jet production cross sections are calculated with the fastnlo code @xcite , which efficiently convolutes the matrix elements , calculated using the nlojet++ program @xcite , with the fitted pdfs . here
is not the place to discuss this , but it should be mentioned that herapdf1.0 and herapdf1.5 fits have been also performed using evolution equations in next - to - next - to - leading order ( nnlo ) . for the reader who wants to know more details and updates on the herapdfs
, they can be found here @xcite .
the data used in the extraction of the pdfs and the strong coupling @xmath0 are the combined nc and cc @xmath27 and @xmath28 inclusive cross sections from the hera - i @xcite and hera - ii running periods @xcite .
in addition , the following jet measurements from the h1 and zeus collaborations were used : normalized inclusive jet cross sections for @xmath29 gev@xmath8 @xcite , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of @xmath30 pb@xmath31 , and inclusive jet cross sections for @xmath32 gev@xmath8 @xcite , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of @xmath33 pb@xmath31 , and inclusive jet cross sections from two running periods in hera - i for @xmath34 gev@xmath8 @xcite , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of @xmath35 pb@xmath31 , and for @xmath36 gev@xmath8 @xcite , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of @xmath37 pb@xmath31 .
the pdfs as a function of @xmath14 at @xmath38 gev@xmath8 , when going from herapdf1.5 ( 10 parameters ) to herapdf1.5f ( 14 parameters ) with fixed @xmath39 , show an overall similar total uncertainty .
the latter yields a softer sea density at high @xmath14 and a suppressed d - valence density at low @xmath14 . keeping @xmath0 fixed and including the jet measurements , which leads to the herapdf1.6 fit , one observes little difference in the pdfs and their uncertainties , only the high @xmath14 gluon uncertainty is somewhat reduced . the respective figures can be found in @xcite .
more interesting results are obtained when the fits for herapdf1.5f ( no jets ) and herapdf1.6 ( with jets ) are performed with @xmath0 treated as a free fit parameter .
the corresponding pdfs and their uncertainty bands are shown in fig.[fig1 ] . for @xmath38 gev@xmath8 with @xmath0 as an additional free parameter in the fit , and ( c ) @xmath40 for both fits .
, title="fig : " ] ( -126.0,121.0)(a ) for @xmath38 gev@xmath8 with @xmath0 as an additional free parameter in the fit , and ( c ) @xmath40 for both fits .
, title="fig : " ] ( -126.0,121.0)(b ) ( -126.0,121.0)(c ) adding the jet data leads to a dramatic decrease of the low @xmath14 gluon uncertainty , not only of the experimental uncertainty , but also of the model and parametrization ones . in fig.[fig1]c
the @xmath40 distributions are shown as a function of @xmath0 .
the herapdf1.5f fit shows a shallow minimum , while the herapdf1.6 fit provides a strong constraint on the value of @xmath0 .
the addition of the jet data successfully reduces the correlation of the strong coupling and the gluon density , for reasons discussed in the introduction .
the increase in the uncertainty of the gluon density due to @xmath0 being a free parameter is not large when jet data are included .
the fit yields the following value for the strong coupling : 68 mm * figure 2 . * @xmath0 values from herapdf1.6 , from jet production in dis , by the h1 and zeus collaborations , and the world average .
[ fig3 ] @xmath41 the hadronization uncertainty is due to the corresponding corrections of the nlo jet cross sections .
the uncertainty due to the scale is estimated by a variation of the renormalization and factorization scale by the conventional factor of @xmath42 and @xmath43 when calculating the jet cross sections .
for the inclusive cross sections this uncertainty was assumed to be negligible . in fig.2
the results on @xmath0 are displayed from herapdf1.6 and as obtained from recent extractions by h1 and zeus using only jet production data in dis .
the experimental and theoretical uncertainties are indicated separately .
for herapdf1.6 the uncertainty due to the pdfs is part of the experimental uncertainty , while for the jets only results it is part of the theory uncertainty .
the values obtained using different methods and experiments are experimentally very precise .
they are consistent with each other and with the world average .
a nlo qcd fit with simultaneous determinations of the proton pdfs and @xmath0 was performed using hera dis data only .
combined h1 and zeus inclusive nc and cc cross sections together with inclusive jet cross sections from the h1 and zeus collaborations have been used . including jet data in the fit and treating @xmath0 as a free parameter , dramatically reduces the correlations between the gluon density and the strong coupling compared to the fit without jets .
the precision of the gluon density is improved , and an accurate and unbiased determination of @xmath0 is achieved , yielding a value consistent with the world average .
h1 and zeus collaboration , `` qcd analysis and determination of @xmath0 using the combined h1 and zeus inclusive cross sections together with the jet production cross section measured by the h1 and zeus experiments , '' _
h1prelim-11 - 034 _ , _ zeus - prel-11 - 001_. f. d. aaron _ et al .
_ [ h1 collaboration ] , _ eur .
j. _ c * 65 * , 363 ( 2010 ) .
[ arxiv:0904.3870 [ hep - ex ] ] .
f. d. aaron _ et al .
_ [ h1 collaboration ] , _ eur .
j. _ c * 67 * , 1 ( 2010 ) .
[ arxiv:0911.5678 [ hep - ex ] ] .
|
rutherford centennial discovery atomic nucleus 1911 scattering alpha - particles on gold foil scattering experiments resolution from @xmath2 times proton radius to @xmath4 hera experiments @xmath5 collider current achievements in extraction of parton density functions proton strong qcd coupling from inclusive jet measurements in dis at hera inclusive neutral current charged current cc measurements leading order - model sensitive to valence sea quarks proton next - - leading order nlo beyond sensitive to gluon density strong coupling strongly correlated inclusive jets in dis sensitive to gluon density strong coupling in lo via boson - gluon fusion process process dominates for negative photon momentum transfer squared @xmath6 less than @xmath7@xmath8 above qcd - compton process dominant sensitivity to strong coupling without gluon addition of jet measurements to inclusive measurements correlation between gluon density strong coupling to extract both pdfs strong coupling from data idea behind herapdfs use only hera nc and cc data in fitscross sections from h1 zeus experiments used increased precision due to statistics intercalibration effects detectors precise data sets with uncertainties between @xmath9 phase space used systematic correlated uncorrelated errors controlled standard @xmath10 uncertainty criterion used hera data include @xmath11 data no uncertainties due to deuterium heavy target corrections two parametrizations studied @xmath12 parameter fit for herapdf1.0 @xmath13 parameter fit provides flexibility for gluon density at low @xmath14 additional jet data @xmath15 starting scale pdfs parametrized @xmath17 constrained by momentum quark sum rules assumed @xmath20 @xmath23 is strange sea fraction at @xmath15 choices define central fit adding more parameters reduce @xmath24 parametrization uncertainty estimated by adding one additional parameter changing parametrizations varying starting scale @xmath15 around default value of @xmath25@xmath8 model uncertainty determined by varying heavy quark masses @xmath23 @xmath26 around default values @xmath26 specifies minimal @xmath6 for data pointfit pdfs performed using nlo dglap equations qcdnum @xcite evolution code charm beauty quarks massive in thorne - roberts variable - flavor - number scheme @xcite jet production cross sections calculated with fastnlo code @xcite convolutes matrix elements nlojet++ program with fitted pdfs herapdf1.0 herapdf1.5 fits performed using evolution equations next - leading order more details updates herapdfs found here @xcite data extraction pdfs strong coupling @xmath0 are combined nc cc @xmath27 @xmath28 inclusive cross sections from hera - i @xcite hera - ii running periods jet measurements from h1 zeus collaborations used normalized inclusive jet cross sections for @xmath29 gev@xmath8 @xcite @xmath30 pb@xmath31 @xmath32 inclusive jet cross sections from two running periods hera - i @xmath34@xmath8 @xmath35 pb@xmath31 @xmath36 @xmath37 pb@xmath31pdfs function of @xmath14 at @xmath38 gev@xmath8 going from herapdf1.5 10 to herapdf1.5f 14 parameters with fixed @xmath39 show similar uncertainty latter yields softer sea density at high @xmath14 suppressed d - valence density at low @xmath14 keeping @xmath0 fixed including jet measurements to herapdf1.6 fit little difference in pdfs uncertainties high @xmath14 gluon uncertainty reduced figures in @xcite interesting results when fits for herapdf1.5f and herapdf1.6 with jets performed with @xmath0 free fit parameter pdfs uncertainty bands shown in fig.[fig1 ] for @xmath38 gev@xmath8 with @xmath0 additional @xmath40 for both adding jet data leads to decrease low @xmath14 gluon uncertainty experimental model in fig.[fig1]c @xmath40 distributions shown function of @xmath0 herapdf1.5f fit shows shallow minimum herapdf1.6 fit strong constraint on value @xmath0addition jet data reduces correlation strong coupling gluon density increase uncertainty gluon density due @xmath0 free parameter not large jet data included fit yields strong coupling : 68 mm figure @xmath0 values from herapdf1.6 jet production h1 zeus collaborations world average @xmath41 hadronization uncertainty due to corrections nlo jet cross sections uncertainty scale estimated by variation renormalization factorization scale factor @xmath42 @xmath43 jet cross sections inclusive cross sections uncertainty negligible fig.2 results @xmath0 from herapdf1.6 recent extractions h1 zeus jet production data experimental theoretical uncertainties indicated separately herapdf1.6 uncertainty due pdfs part experimental uncertainty jets results theory uncertainty values methods experimentally precise consistent with world average nlo qcd fit proton pdfs @xmath0 performed using hera dis data combined h1 zeus inclusive nc cc cross sections inclusive jet cross sections from h1 zeus collaborations used including jet data @xmath0 free parameter reduces correlations gluon density strong coupling jetsprecision gluon density improved accurate determination @xmath0 achieved value consistent world average h1 zeus collaboration qcd analysis determination @xmath0 h1 zeus cross sections jet production cross section h1 zeus experiments h1prelim-11 - 034 zeus - prel-11 - 001 aaron al h1 collaboration eur c * 65 * 363 ( 2010 ) arxiv:0904.3870 hep - h1 collaboration eur c * 67 * 2010 ) arxiv:0911.5678 hep -
| 0.354464
| 2,354
| 1,207
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,647
|
we prove that the genus two surface admits a cw - expansive homeomorphism with a fixed point whose local stable set is not locally connected .
|
in @xcite lewowicz and hiraide proved that every expansive homeomorphism of a compact surface @xmath0 is conjugate with a pseudo - anosov diffeomorphism . recall that a homeomorphism @xmath1 is _ expansive _ if there is @xmath2 such that if @xmath3 for all @xmath4 then @xmath5 . in
@xcite kato introduced a generalization of expansivity called _ continuum - wise expansivity_. we say that @xmath6 is _ cw - expansive _ if there is @xmath2 such that if @xmath7 is a continuum ( compact connected ) and @xmath8 for all @xmath4 then @xmath9 is a singleton . in the works of kato on cw - expansivity we find several generalizations of results holding for expansive homeomorphisms .
also , he found new phenomena as for example a cw - expansive homeomorphism with infinite topological entropy . in this paper
we investigate the possibility of extending results from @xcite for a cw - expansive surface homeomorphism .
a key concept in dynamical systems is that of the stable set of a point . given a homeomorphism @xmath1 and @xmath10 we define the @xmath11-_stable set _ of a point @xmath12 as @xmath13 for a hyperbolic set it is well known that local stable sets are embedded submanifolds ( the invariant manifold theorem ) . in the papers
@xcite they prove that if @xmath1 is expansive then the connected component of @xmath14 in @xmath15 is a locally connected set .
this implies the arc - connection of this components and allows them to prove that each local stable set is a finite union of arcs . in some sense
it is an invariant manifold theorem for expansive homeomorphisms of surfaces .
after this , they prove the conjugacy with a pseudo - anosov diffeomorphism , giving a complete classification of such dynamics .
some cw - expansive homeomorphisms of surfaces are not expansive , see @xcite . in these examples
the components of local stable sets are locally connected .
the purpose of this paper is to construct a cw - expansive homeomorphism of a compact surface with a point whose local stable set is connected but it is not locally connected .
the example is a variation of those in @xcite .
we start defining a homeomorphism of @xmath16 such @xmath17 as a fixed point and its stable set is not locally connected .
then , this anomalous saddle is _ inserted _ in a derived from anosov diffeomorphism of the torus .
finally , this anomalous derived from anosov system is connected via a wandering tube with a usual derived from anosov to obtain our example .
first , we will construct a plane homeomorphism @xmath6 with a fixed point at the origin whose local stable set is connected but not locally connected .
the homeomorphism will be defined as the composition of a piece - wise linear transformation @xmath18 and a time - one map of a flow @xmath19 .
this flow will have a non - locally connected set @xmath20 of fixed points .
we start with the linear part of the construction .
let @xmath21 , for @xmath22 , be the linear transformations defined by @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 .
define the piece - wise linear transformation @xmath27 as @xmath28 in figure [ sillaloca ] we illustrate the definition of @xmath18 .
now we define the non - locally connected plane continuum @xmath20 .
some care is needed in order to be able of relate this set with the transformation @xmath18 .
define the sets : @xmath29 also consider the non - locally connected continuum @xmath30\times\{0\})$ ] shown in figure [ conjuntoe ] .
now we will define a flow related with the set @xmath20 .
consider the continuous function @xmath31 defined by @xmath32 and the vertical vector field @xmath33 defined as @xmath34 since @xmath35 for all @xmath36 , we have that @xmath37 is lipschitz .
therefore , by picard s theorem , @xmath38 has unique solutions and we can consider the flow @xmath39 induced by @xmath38 . since @xmath40 for all @xmath41 we have that every solution is defined for all @xmath42 .
consider @xmath52 such that @xmath51 .
since @xmath38 is a vertical vector field we have that @xmath57}(p)\subset r_1 $ ] . for @xmath58 , if @xmath59 then @xmath60 therefore , @xmath61 for @xmath58 and consequently for @xmath62 .
now take a point @xmath70\times[0,1]$ ] . for @xmath71 , the set defined in ( [ eqr1 ] ) , it is easy to see that @xmath72 as @xmath73 .
assume that @xmath74 .
we will show that @xmath75 .
it is sufficient to show that for some @xmath76 the point @xmath77 is not in @xmath78 . by contradiction , assume that @xmath79 for all @xmath80 .
then , by lemma [ lemar1 ] we know that @xmath81 notice that @xmath82 . then , it only rests to prove that @xmath83 for some @xmath76 .
but this is easy because the velocity of @xmath84 is @xmath85 and this velocity increases with @xmath86 .
we start recalling some properties of what is known as a derived from anosov diffeomorphisms .
the interested reader should consult @xcite*section 8.8 for a construction of such a map and detailed proofs of its properties .
a derived from anosov is a @xmath87 diffeomorphism @xmath88 of the two - dimensional torus such that : it satisfies smale s axiom a and its non - wandering set consists of an expanding attractor and a repeller fixed point @xmath89 .
the expanding attractor is locally a cantor set times an arc , and it has two hyperbolic fixed points of saddle type @xmath90 and @xmath91 as in figure [ figda ] .
now we will _ insert _ the anomalous saddle in the derived from anosov .
let @xmath90 be the hyperbolic fixed point shown in figure [ figda ] .
consider a topological rectangle @xmath100 covering a half - neighborhood of @xmath90 as in figure [ figdarect ] .
consider the homeomorphism with an anomalous saddle fixed point defined in section [ secirregular ] . call this homeomorphism @xmath101 ( to avoid confusion with the derived from anosov @xmath6 ) .
denote by @xmath102 its fixed point ( the origin of @xmath16 ) and take a rectangle @xmath103 , similar to @xmath104 , as in figure [ figdarect ] .
now we can _ replace _ @xmath100 with @xmath105 and define what we call a _ derived from anosov with an anomalous saddle _ as in figure [ figanoda ] . in this section
we finish the construction with ideas from @xcite .
consider @xmath106 and @xmath107 two disjoint copies of the torus @xmath108 .
let @xmath109 , @xmath110 , be two homeomorphisms such that : * @xmath111 is the derived from anosov with an anomalous saddle from the previous section , denote by @xmath112 the source fixed point of @xmath111 , * @xmath113 is the inverse of the derived from anosov ( the usual one ) with a sink fixed point at @xmath114 .
consider the open disk @xmath121 and the compact annulus @xmath122 define @xmath123 as the inversion @xmath124 .
the pull - back of the unstable foliation on @xmath107 by @xmath125 on the annulus @xmath126 is shown in figure [ figfols ] .
on the disjoint union @xmath127\cup [ s_2\setminus \varphi_2(d_{1/2})]$ ] consider the equivalence relation generated by @xmath128 for all @xmath129 .
denote by @xmath130 $ ] the equivalence class of @xmath14 .
the surface @xmath131 is the genus two surface if equipped with the quotient topology .
consider the homeomorphism @xmath1 defined by @xmath132)=\left\ { \begin{array}{ll } \left[f_1(x)\right ] & \hbox { if } x\in s_1 \setminus \varphi_1(d_{1/2})\\ \left[f_2(x)\right ] & \hbox { if } x\in s_2 \setminus \varphi_2(d_2)\\ \end{array } \right.\ ] ] define @xmath135 $ ] the annulus on @xmath0 corresponding to @xmath126 .
we will perturb the homeomorphism @xmath6 defined above on the annulus @xmath136 .
first note that the non - wandering set of @xmath6 is expansive and dynamically isolated , i.e. there is a neighborhood @xmath137 of the non - wandering set @xmath138 such that if @xmath139 for all @xmath4 then @xmath140 .
also note that for every wandering point @xmath12 there is @xmath4 such that @xmath141 .
therefore , it is sufficient to prove that there is a homeomorphism @xmath142 such that @xmath143 and there is @xmath144 such that for each @xmath145 the intersection @xmath134 is totally disconnected . in figure [ figfols ] we have the picture of the unstable foliation on @xmath136 ( or in local charts ) .
the problem is that the stable sets do not make a foliation , this is because there is an anomalous saddle .
then , it is convenient to consider the stable partition , i.e. , the partition defined by the equivalence relation of being positively asymptotic .
this partition is illustrated in figure [ figstpart ] .
we know that the unstable leaves are circle arcs , as in figure [ figfols ] .
therefore , it is sufficient to consider a @xmath146 perturbation @xmath101 of @xmath6 supported on @xmath136 , such that the stable partition of @xmath101 in the annulus contains no circle arc , in local charts . see comments below . by the previous comments this implies that @xmath101 is cw - expansive . since @xmath101 coincides with @xmath6 outside @xmath136 , we have that @xmath101 has an anomalous saddle with non - locally connected stable set .
this finishes the proof .
the example has further properties that we wish to remark .
given @xmath147 we say that @xmath6 is @xmath148-_expansive _
@xcite if there is @xmath2 such that @xmath149 for all @xmath12 , where @xmath150 stands for the cardinality of the set @xmath126 .
we have that the example of the previous proof is not @xmath148-expansive for all @xmath147 because there are point with @xmath151 for arbitrarilly small values of @xmath152 .
we say that a probability measure @xmath153 on @xmath0 is an _ expansive measure _
@xcite if there is @xmath2 such that @xmath154 for all @xmath12 .
obviously , if @xmath153 is an expansive measure then @xmath155 for all @xmath12 , i.e @xmath153 is non - atomic . in @xcite
it is shown that every non - atomic probability measure is expansive if and only if there is @xmath2 such that @xmath156 for all @xmath12 .
this property is called _ countable - expansivity _ and our example satisfies this condition . in the generalized pseudo - anosov shown in @xcite
there is a finite number of _ spines _ ( or 1-_prongs _ ) , i.e. points whose local stable sets do not separate arbitrarilly small neighborhoods .
this is a cw - expansive homeomorphism on the two - sphere .
our example has a countable set of spines , namely , the points in the set @xmath20 of figure [ conjuntoe ] in the line @xmath157 give rise to spines in the example .
as explained in @xcite the generalized pseudo - anosov of the two - sphere has points with its local stable set non - locally connected .
but the components are arcs .
our example has connected components not being locally connected .
it seems to be the case that if we start with a set like the graph of @xmath158 , in place of the set @xmath20 , we can obtain an anomalous saddle with no arc - connected stable set .
notice that the set @xmath20 is arc - connected .
|
@xcite lewowicz hiraide proved expansive homeomorphism surface @xmath0 with pseudo - anosov diffeomorphism homeomorphism @xmath1 expansive if @xmath2 @xmath4 @xmath5 kato introduced continuum - wise expansivity @xmath6 cw - expansive if @xmath2 @xmath7 continuum @xmath8 @xmath4 @xmath9 singleton works kato cw - expansivity generalizations expansive homeomorphisms found new phenomena cw - expansive homeomorphism infinite topological entropy paper extending results @xcite cw - expansive surface homeomorphism key concept dynamical systems stable set point homeomorphism @xmath1 @xmath10 define @xmath11-_stable set point @xmath12 @xmath13 hyperbolic local stable sets embedded submanifolds invariant manifold theorem papers @xmath1 expansive connected component @xmath14 @xmath15 locally connected set implies arc - connection components local stable set finite union arcs invariant manifold theorem for expansive homeomorphisms conjugacy with pseudo - anosov diffeomorphism complete classification dynamicscw - expansive homeomorphisms not expansive see @xcite components local stable sets connected purpose construct cw - expansive homeomorphism compact surface point local stable set connected not locally connected example variation @xcite defining homeomorphism @xmath16 @xmath17 fixed point stable set not locally connected anomalous saddle inserted in anosov diffeomorphism torus anomalous anosov system connected wandering tube usual derived anosov construct plane homeomorphism @xmath6 fixed point origin local stable set connected not locally connected homeomorphism defined composition piece - wise linear transformation @xmath18 time - one map flow @xmath19 flow non - locally connected set @xmath20 fixed points start linear part construction @xmath21 @xmath22 linear transformations defined @xmath23 define piece - wise linear transformation @xmath27 @xmath28 figure definition define non - locally connected plane continuum @xmath20 relate set transformation @xmath18 define sets consider non - locally connected continuum @xmath30 figure define flow related with set @xmath20continuous function @xmath31 @xmath32 vertical vector field @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 is lipschitz picard s theorem @xmath38 unique solutions flow @xmath39 by @xmath38 @xmath40 @xmath41 solution defined @xmath42 @xmath52 @xmath51 @xmath38 vertical vector field @xmath57}(p)\subset r_1 $ ] @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 for @xmath58 @xmath62 point @xmath70\times[0,1]$ ] @xmath71 defined eqr1 ] @xmath72 as @xmath73 assume @xmath74 show @xmath75 @xmath76 point @xmath77 not in @xmath78 @xmath79 for @xmath80 lemma lemar1 @xmath81 @xmath82 prove @xmath83 for @xmath76 velocity of @xmath84 is @xmath85 increases with @xmath86 recalling properties derived from anosov diffeomorphisms consult @xcite*section 8.8 construction map detailed proofs propertiesderived from anosov @xmath87 diffeomorphism @xmath88 two - dimensional torus satisfies smale s axiom non - wandering set expanding attractor repeller fixed point @xmath89 expanding attractor cantor set times arc two hyperbolic fixed points @xmath90 @xmath91 figure insert anomalous saddle derived from anosov @xmath90 hyperbolic fixed point topological rectangle @xmath100 half - neighborhood @xmath90 homeomorphism with anomalous saddle fixed point call homeomorphism @xmath101 confusion derived from anosov denote @xmath102 fixed point origin @xmath16 rectangle @xmath103 similar to @xmath104 replace @xmath100 with @xmath105 define derived from anosov with anomalous saddle figure finish construction with ideas from @xcite @xmath106 @xmath107 disjoint copies of torus @xmath108 @xmath109 @xmath110 homeomorphisms @xmath111 derived from anosov anomalous saddle @xmath112 source fixed point @xmath111 @xmath113 inverse of derived from anosov sink fixed point @xmath114open disk @xmath121 compact annulus @xmath122 define @xmath123 inversion @xmath124 pull - back unstable foliation @xmath107 @xmath125 annulus @xmath126 shown figure disjoint union @xmath127\cup s_2\setminus \varphi_2(d_{1/2}) equivalence relation @xmath128 @xmath129 @xmath130 equivalence class @xmath14 surface @xmath131 genus two surface topology homeomorphism @xmath1 @xmath132)\left{array[f_1(x)\right\hbox s_1\setminus\varphi_1(d_{1/2}_2)\setminus\varphi_2(d_2)\\ define @xmath135 annulus @xmath0 corresponding @xmath126 perturb homeomorphism @xmath6 annulus @xmath136 non - wandering set @xmath6 expansive dynamically isolated neighborhood @xmath137 non - wandering set @xmath138 @xmath139 @xmath4 @xmath140 every wandering point @xmath12 @xmath4 @xmath141 homeomorphism @xmath142 @xmath143 @xmath144 @xmath145 intersection @xmath134 disconnectedfigure [ figfols ] unstable foliation on @xmath136 stable sets make foliation anomalous saddle consider stable partition defined equivalence relation positively asymptotic partition illustrated figure [ unstable leaves are circle arcs consider @xmath146 perturbation @xmath101 of @xmath6 @xmath136 stable partition @xmath101 no circle arc implies @xmath101 is cw - expansive coincides with @xmath6 outside @xmath136 @xmath101 anomalous saddle non - locally connected stable set finishes proof example further properties @xmath147 @xmath6 is @xmath148-_expansive @xcite if @xmath2 @xmath149 for all @xmath12 @xmath150 stands for cardinality set @xmath126 example not @xmath148-expansive for all @xmath147 point with @xmath151 for small values of @xmath152 probability measure @xmath153 on @xmath0 expansive measure if @xmath2 @xmath154 for all @xmath12 if @xmath153 expansive measure @xmath155 for all @xmath12 @xmath153 non - atomic@xcite non - atomic probability measure expansive if @xmath2 @xmath156 @xmath12 property called countable - expansivity example satisfies condition generalized pseudo - anosov finite number spines 1-_prongs points local stable sets not separate small neighborhoods cw - expansive homeomorphism two - sphere example has countable set spines points set @xmath20 figure line @xmath157 give rise to spines generalized pseudo - anosov has points local stable set non - locally connected components are arcs example has connected components not locally connected start with set graph @xmath158 @xmath20 obtain anomalous saddle no arc - connected stable set set @xmath20 arc - connected
| 0.435927
| 2,878
| 1,573
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,655
|
we have found that the minimum energy configuration of @xmath0 charges confined in a disk and interacting via the coulomb potential , reported by cerkaski et al . in ref .
@xcite is not a global minimum of the total electrostatic energy .
we have identified a large number of configurations with lower energy , where defects are present close to the center of the disk ; thus , the formation of a hexagonal core and valence circular rings for the centered configurations , predicted by the model of ref .
@xcite , is not supported by numerical evidence and the configurations obtained with this model can not be used as a guide for the numerical calculations , as claimed by the authors . in a recent paper , ref .
@xcite , cerkaski et al . studied the problem of a finite number of equal charges , interacting via the coulomb potential and confined inside a disk .
this problem has been previously studied by several authors in a series of papers , refs .
@xcite , and it can be regarded as a generalization of the well known thomson problem @xcite ( finding the configurations of minimum energy of @xmath1 equal charges on the surface of a sphere ) . despite the apparent simplicity , both problems provide a serious computational challenge , of increasing difficulty with @xmath1 : in particular , the number of local minima of the total electrostatic energy grows very fast with @xmath1 ( for the case of the thomson problem see for example the discussion in ref .
@xcite ) . as a result
, the identification of the global minimum of a system of @xmath1 charges typically requires extensive numerical calculations : in the absence of a formal criterium to establish whether a given configuration of equilibrium is a global minimum , one has to repeat the numerical calculations several times , keeping @xmath1 fixed , and regard the configuration with lowest energy among those obtained as a probable candidate for a global minimum . for the case of the disk , erkoc and oymak @xcite
have observed the tendency , for systems with modest number of charges ( @xmath2 ) , to accomodate the charges on concentric rings , empirically deducing the rules for the distribution of charges on the disk ( incidentally , most of the energies reported by these authors in tables @xcite do not correspond to global minima ) . the analysis performed by cerkaski et al . in ref .
@xcite is a refinement of the work of erkoc and oymak @xcite , and it relies on the hypothesis that charges arrange on concentric rings , for configurations of minimum energy . in this way ,
the original problem is reduced to the much simpler problem of calculating the electrostatic energy due to @xmath3 rings , each carrying an appropriate number of charges , uniformely distributed over the ring ; the equilibrium configuration in this case is obtained by solving a system of two equations ( their eqs .
( 16 ) and ( 17 ) ) . to test their model
the authors have performed numerical ( molecular dynamics , md for short ) calculations for systems up to @xmath4 charges . based on this analysis
they conclude that their approach allows one `` to determine with high accuracy the equilibrium configurations of a few hundred charged particles '' . in particular , for @xmath5 their approach `` predicts the formation of the hexagonal core and valence circular rings for the centered configurations '' , with `` an increasing sequence of rings , starting from the center , matching the regular hexagonal pattern '' . for the case of @xmath0 , discussed at length in ref .
@xcite the authors observe the formation of an hexagonal structure with rings @xmath6 . fig .
2b of ref .
@xcite , that reports a comparison between the model and the numerical md calculations for @xmath0 charges , displays an excellent agreement between the two , with only a small mismatch just outside the hexagonal structure ( the green region in the figure is used to highlight the hexagonal structure ) . the energy reported by the authors for this configuration , which is expected to be
a global minimum of the total energy , is @xmath7 , compared to the energy @xmath8 , obtained with their model , with an error of just @xmath9 . with the purpose of veryfying the results of ref .
@xcite we have carried out extensive numerical calculations , in particular for the case of @xmath10 charges .
the approach that we have implemented allows one to generate configurations with the desired number of charges on the border : in this way we have verified that the lower energies occurr when @xmath11 charges are disposed on the border of the disk , in agreement with ref .
@xcite .
we have thus generated @xmath12 configurations with @xmath11 , starting from initial configurations where the internal charges are randomly distributed , and we have found that @xmath13 of them have energy lower that the value reported in ref .
@xcite , @xmath14 .
the lowest energy among those that we have calculated ( possibly a global minimum ) is @xmath15 .
the histogram in fig .
[ fig_1 ] illustrates these points .
interestingly , we have also found that even the configuration with largest energy has an energy slightly lower that the value predicted by the model of ref .
@xcite , @xmath16 ( see fig . [ fig_1 ] ) . in fig .
[ fig_2 ] we display the configuration with the lowest energy among those calculated ( an hexagonal grid is also plotted , to facilitate the identification of a centered hexagonal structure ) ; note that the color of the vertices , representing the charges , depends on the number of nearest neighbors . studying this figure
, we observe the presence of defects very close to the center of the disk , and of a single , slightly deformed , hexagonal cell ( the yellow region ) , centered at the origin , in sharp contrast with the numerical and theoretical observations of ref .
@xcite .
additionally , we have also found that similar behaviors are also observed for the configurations with slightly larger energy .
we summarize our main findings : * the occurrence of defects , even very close to the center of the disk , may help to lower the total energy , while disrupting the hexagonal structure ; * all the configurations with @xmath11 that we have calculated have energy lower than the theoretical value obtained in ref .
@xcite and about @xmath17 of them has energy lower than the numerical md value of ref .
@xcite ; * the use of the model of ref .
@xcite as a guide for the numerical md calculation ( which is also claimed to cut the cpu times by a factor @xmath18 ) , as suggested by the authors , is definitively unjustified . using this approach
, we may expect that the solutions not only will correspond to local minima of the energy , but they will also be strongly biased ( i.e. the more symmetric structures could be favored ) ; * the number of configurations grows very fast with @xmath1 , thus requiring an efficient numerical approach : our program allows to generate configurations with a desired number of charges on the border .
we have found that in this way the performance is drastically improved ; in light of this findings , the validity of the model of ref .
@xcite must be questioned , particularly for @xmath5 ; it also appear clear the inadeguacy of the numerical calculation of ref .
@xcite , which has failed to identify a very large number of configurations with energy lower than the one reported by the authors ( about @xmath17 of the configurations that we have calculated have lower energy than the one of ref .
@xcite ! ) .
we are not sure whether this problem has been triggered by using the output of the model as a guide for the numerical calculation or if the program used by the authors produced a small number of configurations with @xmath11 .
charges with @xmath11.,width=264 ] charges with energy @xmath19,width=302 ]
|
this research was supported by the sistema nacional de investigadores ( mxico ) . 99 cerkaski , m. , r. g. nazmitdinov , and a. puente , physical review e 91.3 ( 2015 ) : 032312 a.a .
berezin , nature * 315 * , 104 ( 1985 ) l.t . wille and j. vennik ,
a : math . gen . * 18 * , l1113 ( 1985 ) k.j .
nurmela , j. phys .
a : math . gen . * 31 * , 1035 ( 1998 ) s. erkoc and h. oymak , phys . rev.*e * 62 , r3075-r3076 ( 2000 ) s. erkoc and h. oymak , physics letters a 290.1 ( 2001 ) : 28 - 34 a. worley , arxiv : physics/0609231 ( 2006 ) mughal , a. and m. a. moore , physical review e 76.1 ( 2007 ) : 011606
thomson , philos . mag . * 7 * , 237 ( 1904 ) m. calef , w. griffiths and a. schultz , j. stat .
phys . * 160 * , 239 - 253 ( 2015 )
|
research supported sistema nacional investigadores mxico cerkaski nazmitdinov puente physical review 91.3 2015 032312 berezin nature 315 104 1985 wille vennik math gen 18 l1113 1985 nurmela phys math 31 1035 1998 erkoc h oymak phys . 62 r3075-r3076 ( 2000 ) erkoc oymak physics letters 290.1 2001 ) 28 - 34 physics/0609231 2006 ) mughal moore physical review 76.1 2007 ) 011606 thomson philos . mag. 7 237 ( 1904 ) calef griffiths schultz stat . . 160 239 - 253 ( 2015
| 0.073174
| 312
| 177
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,657
|
these proceedings summarize the first miniboone electron antineutrino appearance search results , corresponding to a data sample collected for 3.39@xmath010@xmath1 protons on target ( pot ) .
the search serves as a direct test of the lsnd oscillation signature , and provides complementary information which can be used in studies addressing the miniboone neutrino - mode low - energy excess .
|
the miniboone experiment has performed a search for @xmath2 oscillations at large @xmath3 @xcite , an oscillation signature that had been observed by the lsnd experiment , with 3.8@xmath4 significance @xcite .
this oscillation interpretation relies on the existence of a fourth , sterile neutrino mass eigenstate , with @xmath5 0.1 - 100 ev@xmath6 .
mixing via this fourth mass eigenstate can lead to a small probability amplitude for @xmath2 and @xmath7 oscillations at @xmath8/e[mev]\sim$ ] 1 .
miniboone has previously searched for this type of oscillation using a neutrino beam @xcite , and , under the assumption of cpt conservation , has excluded the lsnd interpretation 98% confidence level ( cl ) @xcite . at the same time , the search revealed an excess of @xmath9 events at low energy @xcite , which is inconsistent with the lsnd excess under the a single sterile neutrino oscillation hypothesis ; however , extensions of this model @xcite offer the possibility of reconsiling the miniboone neutrino results with the lsnd antineutrino result .
these models involve large cp violation which leads to different probabilities for @xmath7 as opposed to @xmath2 oscillations . other models @xcite have also been suggested as explanations , some of which offer predictions for antineutrino running at miniboone . in order to provide another handle on the low - energy excess ,
miniboone was approved in 2007 for extended antineutrino running @xcite , which also enabled miniboone to perform a direct test of the lsnd oscillation interpretation , using antineutrinos .
the miniboone experiment uses 8 gev protons incident on a beryllium target in order to produce mesons which subsequently decay to generate the neutrino beam .
a magnetic field is used at the target to focus positively charged mesons in the forward direction , and defocus negatively charged mesons , to produce a neutrino beam .
reversing the polarity of the magnetic field allows miniboone to switch from a neutrino to an antineutrino beam . the flux @xcite consists primarily of @xmath10 and @xmath11 .
the low @xmath9 and @xmath12 content of the beam minimizes the background to the oscillation search , ensuring sensitivity to small - amplitude ( of order 10@xmath13 ) oscillations .
the @xmath10 flux has a mean energy of @xmath14600 mev .
the miniboone detector @xcite is located at l=541 m from the proton target .
this establishes an @xmath15 similar to lsnd , and therefore sensitivity to @xmath5 1 ev@xmath6 .
the detector is a spherical tank , 12 meters in diameter , filled with mineral oil and lined with photomultiplier tubes ( pmts ) .
the particle detection and identification method relies on the detection of cherenkov and scintillation light emitted by outgoing charged particles which are produced in neutrino interactions .
the antineutrino oscillation analysis @xcite employs the same analysis chain that was implemented in neutrino mode @xcite .
the analysis relies on differentiation between a majority of @xmath10 charged - current quasi - elastic ( ccqe ) events , and @xmath12 ccqe events , which are the signal .
a track - based event reconstruction is implemented , which uses pmt hit topology and timing to identify electron - like or muon - like cherenkov rings from the corresponding ccqe interactions .
the @xmath12 and @xmath10 ccqe spectra are fitted simultaneously as a function of reconstructed antineutrino energy , @xmath16 , and the oscillation parameters @xmath3 and @xmath17 are extracted .
the @xmath10 ccqe prediction is used in the fit in order to provide a constraint to the @xmath18 ccqe prediction , as both spectra are correlated through flux and cross section systematics . the @xmath12 ccqe background prediction , for 3.39@xmath010@xmath1 pot ,
is shown in fig .
[ fig : nue ] .
the background is dominated at low energy by mis - identified @xmath10 events , such as neutral - current ( nc ) @xmath19 interactions .
that is because miniboone can not differentiate between a single photon or a single electron produced in the detector . at high energy ,
the dominant background is ccqe interactions of intrinsic @xmath12 from the beam , produced in @xmath20 and @xmath21 decays .
the sensitivity to @xmath2 oscillations is shown in fig .
[ fig : lim ] . the miniboone sensitivity provides substantial coverage of the lower @xmath3 region allowed at 90% cl by a joint analysis of lsnd and karmen @xcite data @xcite . the antineutrino sensitivity and limit to lsnd - allowed @xmath2 oscillations , from fits to 200 @xmath22 3000 mev .
the miniboone antineutrino dataset corresponds to 3.39@xmath010@xmath1 pot .
also shown is the limit from karmen @xcite.,width=264 ]
the reconstructed energy spectrum of @xmath12 ccqe data is shown in fig .
[ fig : nue ] , overlaid on the predicted @xmath12 ccqe background . at energies above 475 mev
, the data agree with the background prediction within systematic and statistical uncertainties .
the 475 - 675 mev energy region shows a 2.8@xmath4 data fluctuation above background prediction .
this fluctuation forces the miniboone limit , shown in fig .
[ fig : lim ] , to be significantly worse than the sensitivity at lower @xmath3 .
the miniboone best oscillation fit corresponds to ( @xmath23 4.4 ev@xmath6 , @xmath24 0.004 ) .
interestingly , the low - energy region ( 200 - 475 mev ) shows no evidence of an excess . in this range , miniboone observes 61 events , compared to a background expectation of 61.5@xmath2511.7 ( sys+stat ) events .
table [ tab : excess ] shows the probability ( from a two - parameter fit to the data ) that each of the following hypotheses explains the observed number of low - energy neutrino and antineutrino events : 1 ) same @xmath4 : same nc cross section for neutrinos and antineutrinos .
2 ) @xmath19 scaled : scaled to the number of nc @xmath19 events .
3 ) pot scaled : scaled to number of pot .
4 ) bkgd scaled : scaled to the total number of background events .
5 ) cc scaled : scaled to the number of cc events .
5 ) kaon scaled : scaled to the number of low - energy @xmath20 events .
6 ) neutrino scaled : scaled to the number of neutrino events .
the same @xmath4 , pot scaled , and kaon scaled hypotheses are disfavored as explanations of the miniboone low - energy excess .
the most preferred model is that where the low - energy excess is contributed from only neutrinos in the beam .
.the @xmath26-probability that each hypothesis explains the observed number of low - energy neutrino and antineutrino events , assuming only statistical , fully correlated systematic , and fully uncorrelated systematic errors .
a proper treatment of systematic correlations is in progress . [
cols="<,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
miniboone has performed a blind analysis for @xmath2 oscillations .
the @xmath12 data is found in agreement with the background prediction as a function of @xmath16 .
no strong evidence for oscillations in antineutrino mode has been found , given the current statistics .
interestingly , there is no evidence of significant excess at low energy in antineutrino mode .
this has already placed constraints to various suggested low - energy excess interpretations .
miniboone is currently collecting more antineutrino data , for a total of 5.0@xmath010@xmath1 pot , and has been approved for further running , to collect a total of 10.@xmath010@xmath1 pot .
this will improve sensitivity to oscillations , and allow further investigation of the neutrino - mode low - energy excess .
additional information will be provided by the numi - beam neutrinos detected at miniboone @xcite .
|
miniboone experiment for @xmath2 oscillations at @xmath3 @xcite observed by lsnd experiment 3.8@xmath4 significance @xcite interpretation relies fourth neutrino mass eigenstate @xmath5 0.1 - 100 ev@xmath6 mixing small probability amplitude for @xmath2 @xmath7 oscillations at @xmath8/e 1 miniboone searched for oscillation neutrino beam @xcite excluded lsnd interpretation 98% confidence level @xcite search revealed excess of @xmath9 events at low energy @xcite inconsistent with lsnd excess single sterile neutrino oscillation hypothesis extensions model @xcite miniboone neutrino results with lsnd antineutrino models involve large cp violation different probabilities for @xmath7 @xmath2 oscillations other models @xcite suggested antineutrino running miniboone approved 2007 for extended antineutrino running @xcite direct test lsnd oscillation interpretation antineutrinos uses 8 gev protons beryllium target produce mesons neutrino beammagnetic field target positively charged mesons negatively neutrino beam reversing polarity allows miniboone neutrino to antineutrino beam flux @xcite @xmath10 @xmath11 low @xmath9 @xmath12 content minimizes background oscillation search sensitivity to small - amplitude 10@xmath13 oscillations @xmath10 flux mean energy @xmath14600 mev miniboone detector at l=541 m from proton target @xmath15 similar to lsnd sensitivity to @xmath5@xmath6 detector spherical tank 12 meters filled with mineral oil lined photomultiplier tubes particle detection identification cherenkov scintillation light charged particles neutrino interactions antineutrino oscillation analysis same neutrino mode between @xmath10 events @xmath12 ccqe events track - based event reconstruction uses pmt hit topology timing identify electron - muon - like cherenkov rings from ccqe interactions @xmath12 @xmath10 ccqe spectra fitted simultaneously reconstructed antineutrino energy @xmath16 oscillation parameters @xmath3 @xmath17 extracted@xmath10 ccqe prediction @xmath18 ccqe prediction spectra correlated flux cross section @xmath12 ccqe background prediction 3.39@xmath010@xmath1 pot fig . dominated low energy by mis - identified @xmath10 events @xmath19 interactions miniboone differentiate photon electron high energy dominant background ccqe interactions @xmath12 @xmath20 @xmath21 sensitivity to @xmath2 oscillations fig . miniboone sensitivity provides coverage lower @xmath3 region 90% cl analysis lsnd karmen @xcite data antineutrino sensitivity limit to lsnd - allowed @xmath2 oscillations to 3000 mev miniboone antineutrino dataset corresponds to 3.39@xmath010@xmath1 pot limit from karmen @xcite reconstructed energy spectrum @xmath12 ccqe data fig . predicted @xmath12 ccqe background energies above 475 mev data agree with background prediction 475 - 675 mev energy region 2.8@xmath4 data fluctuation above background prediction miniboone limit worse than sensitivity lower @xmath3miniboone oscillation fit corresponds to @xmath23 4.4 ev@xmath6, @xmath24 0.004 ) low - energy region 200 - 475 mev ) shows no evidence excess miniboone observes 61 events compared to expectation 61.5@xmath2511.7 events table excess shows probability hypotheses explains observed low - energy neutrino antineutrino events @xmath4 @xmath19 scaled nc events pot scaled pot bkgd scaled background events cc scaled cc events kaon scaled low - energy @xmath20 events neutrino scaled neutrino events same @xmath4 pot scaled kaon scaled hypotheses disfavored miniboone low - energy excess preferred model low - energy excess contributed from only neutrinos in beam @xmath26-probability each hypothesis explains low - energy neutrino antineutrino events assuming statistical fully correlated uncorrelated systematic errors treatment of systematic correlations in progress miniboone performed blind analysis for @xmath2 oscillations @xmath12 data agreement with background prediction function @xmath16no strong evidence oscillations antineutrino mode current statistics no evidence significant excess low energy constraints low - energy excess interpretations miniboone collecting more antineutrino data 5.0@xmath010@xmath1 pot approved further running 10.@xmath010@xmath1 pot oscillations investigation neutrino - mode low - energy excess additional information numi - beam neutrinos miniboone @xcite
| 0.313021
| 1,866
| 1,003
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,658
|
the weak decay as well as the strong nucleon coupling constants of the isoscalar axial vector meson @xmath0 are estimated within the octet quark model .
it is shown that the empirical value for the coupling of @xmath1 quarkonium to nucleons can be understood by attributing the @xmath2-nucleon coupling to the @xmath3 triangle diagram .
-2 cm the coupling of the @xmath2 meson to the isoscalar + axial current of the nucleon m. kirchbach institut fr kernphysik , th darmstadt , d64289 darmstadt , germany and d.o .
riska department of physics , sf00014 university of helsinki , finland
|
one of the most striking empirical indications for the approximate chiral symmetry of the strong interaction is the existence of the two complete low mass vector meson nonets with opposite parities .
an important phenomenological implication of the vector mesons is their role in the electromagnetic structure of the baryons .
it was realized early on that the @xmath4 and @xmath5 mesons can be used to parametrize the isovector and isoscalar electromagnetic formfactors of the nucleon in terms of ( di)pole forms ( vector meson dominance vmd ) @xcite @xcite .
the vmd idea has also been extended to the parametrization of the axial isovector form factor of the nucleon @xcite .
this is illustrated e.g. by the phenomenological vector meson lagrangian proposed in ref.@xcite , which suggests that the charged weak vector and axial vector nucleon form factors should be expressed as pole terms that contain the masses @xmath6 and @xmath7 of the @xmath4 and @xmath8 mesons and their respective couplings @xmath9 , and @xmath10 to the external @xmath11 weak current .
we here extend the vmd hypothesis to the isoscalar axial form factor of the nucleon along the lines of refs .
@xcite , @xcite and present a model for the @xmath12 coupling constant .
the paper is organized as follows . in section 2
we calculate the weak decay couplings of the @xmath2 ( subsequently denoted by @xmath13 ) and @xmath14 ( subsequently denoted by @xmath15 ) mesons and exploit vmd to derive relations between hadronic and semileptonic couplings . in section 3 we calculate the contribution of the @xmath16 triangle diagram to the @xmath17 vertex and demonstrate its importance for the coupling of the nucleon to an external isoscalar axial vector current .
the paper ends with a short summary .
the neutral weak axial current of the nucleon @xmath18 is determined by the matrix element of the corresponding isotriplet ( @xmath19 ) , singlet ( @xmath20 ) , and octet ( @xmath21 ) quark currents as @xmath22 where @xmath23 is the flavour triplet @xmath24 of up , down and strange quark fields .
the vmd hypothesis implies the following field
current identities : @xmath25 where @xmath26 , @xmath27 , and @xmath28 , which denote the fields of the isotriplet , the octet singlet , and the octet isoscalar axial vector mesons , respectively and @xmath29 are the corresponding decay constants .
the vmd hypothesis allows derivation of interesting relations between various hadronic and semileptonic couplings .
for example , in describing the @xmath30 annihilation coupling constant @xmath31 by means of the chain @xmath32 ( fig .
1a ) the following expression is obtained : @xmath33 another intriguing relation arises between the pion weak decay coupling constant @xmath34 and the coupling constant @xmath35 of the ( hypothetical ) weak decay reaction @xmath36 , which is of interest for the evaluation of short range meson exchange currents in nuclear muon capture reactions of the type displayed in fig .
1b , @xmath37 to obtain this equation we use the lagrangian density @xmath38 in eq .
( 2.4 ) @xmath39 is the external weak axial lepton current . in the limit of equal meson masses
the nonrelativistic quark model leads to the following relation between these decay constants : @xmath40 the numerical value of @xmath41 is determined by the second weinberg sum rule @xcite as @xmath42 , while @xmath9 is given by the ksfr relation as @xmath43 , where @xmath34 is the pion decay constant .
( 2.2 ) allows expression of the couplings @xmath44 and @xmath45 in terms of @xmath41 .
this leads to the following numerical values : @xmath46 according to the universal current - current coupling model the meson - nucleon vertices are described by effective lagrangians of the type @xmath47 in the quark model the wave functions of the low lying vector mesons are described as linear combinations of quark antiquark ( @xmath48 ) pairs in ( three dimensional ) flavour space .
the physical singlet and isoscalar states of both the vector and axial vector meson nonets are moreover predicted to be mixed by the so called ideal mixing angle @xmath49 with the consequence that the states @xmath1 and @xmath50 decouple completely .
this is equivalent to a suppression of @xmath51 transitions ( the okubo
iizuka rule ) .
consequently the decay of , say , the @xmath52 meson into three pions via the chain @xmath53 is represented in qcd by nonplanar diagrams , which are known to be suppressed relative to the leading planar graphs by @xmath54 .
the constants @xmath55 and @xmath56 corresponding to the ideally mixed @xmath13 and @xmath15 mesons are then given as @xmath57 in this way the couplings of the isoscalar axial vector mesons to the external lepton current equal ( up to the sign ) the corresponding couplings of the isocalar vector mesons for which the following relations have been obtained within the quark model @xcite , @xmath58 , and @xmath59 .
the experimental values for the physical mixing angle ( subsequently denoted by @xmath60 ) , which have been extracted from the empirical meson masses with linear or quadratic mass formulae , disagree however with the ideal one .
this difference is comparatively small in the case of the vector meson nonet ( about @xmath61 ) .
even so , the small observed @xmath62 mixing has a non
negligible impact on the weak vector strangeness radius of the nucleon a result obtained in @xcite , @xcite under the assumption of vmd of the isoscalar weak vector current .
the axial vector meson nonet is clearly also non - ideal , as the empirical mixing value for it is @xmath63 @xcite .
the wave functions of the isoscalar axial vector mesons that take into account the mixing between the strange and non strange quarkonia are @xmath64 the substantial deviation of the d e mixing from the ideal mixing angle is explained qualitatively in qcd as being due to strong nonperturbative effects in the isoscalar axial channel @xcite . in the case of the mixed isoscalar axial vector mesons eqs .
( 2.9)(2.10 ) are replaced by @xmath65 the isoscalar axial vector mesons d(1285 ) and e(1420 ) are expected to be important as intermediate states in @xmath66 annihilation as well as in neutrino scattering processes . in this context the weak decay couplings of the @xmath67 mesons can be associated with the quantities @xmath68 .
the interpretation of the latter as the strong meson
nucleon couplings is , however , not obvious .
this follows from the observation that eq .
( 2.1 ) in fact reduces to @xmath69 where @xmath70 is the weak proton axial coupling constant , and @xmath71 denotes the so called weak isoscalar nucleon coupling ( @xmath72 @xcite ) .
this equation suggests that the coupling constants in the @xmath12 and @xmath73 vertices ( in turn denoted by @xmath74 , and @xmath75 ) will be determined by the @xmath1 components of the corresponding wave functions according to @xmath76 here @xmath77 denotes the coupling of the purely strange quarkonia to the nucleon . by the parity invariance ( chiral symmetry ) of the strong interaction
one can assume that the value @xmath78 from the axial vector meson nonet equals the empirical value of @xmath79 , which is extracted from data on the vector meson nonet @xcite .
this yields the following relation @xmath80 in the following section we show that by attributing the f@xmath81(1285)nn coupling to the @xmath3 triangle diagram , which is the dominant one loop contribution to the isoscalar weak axial nucleon coupling , the empirical value for the coupling of the @xmath1 quarkonium to the nucleon is well understood .
the @xmath83 triangle diagram contribution to the @xmath13-nucleon coupling @xmath74 ( fig .
2 ) and the corresponding form factor can be calculated using the @xmath84 lagrangian ( 2.5 ) and the following lagrangians for the @xmath85 and @xmath86 couplings @xmath87 here @xmath88 and @xmath89 in turn denote the pseudovector @xmath90nn and the scalar @xmath91 coupling constants , for which we adopt the values @xmath92 and @xmath93 , respectively .
these values are implied by the semiphenomenological bonn one boson exchange model for the nucleon - nucleon interaction @xcite .
we define the effective d - nucleon vertex by the scalar product between the weak isoscalar axial vector current of the nucleon ( @xmath18 ) and the @xmath2 field ( denoted by @xmath94 ) as @xmath95 the product @xmath96 equals now the quantity @xmath74 introduced by eq .
( 2.16 ) with @xmath97 . to regularize the integral in the triangle diagrams in fig.2
we introduce the same monopole formfactors at the @xmath90nn and @xmath98nn vertices as in the potential model @xcite .
the two triangle diagrams then give the following contribution to the dnn vertex : @xmath99 here @xmath100 and @xmath101 are the mass parameters in the monopole vertex factors , for which we use the values 1.3 gev and 2.0 gev respectively , and the function @xmath102 is defined as @xmath103 the dnn coupling constant is obtained by setting @xmath104 in eq . ( 3.4 ) .
note that as @xmath105 the expression ( 3.4 ) has a small imaginary part when the d - meson is on shell , which we shall ignore .
using for @xmath106 the value 5.7 from the experimental partial decay width @xcite , the real part of ( 3.4 ) at @xmath104 is then 1.9 , which we shall interpret as the value for the dnn coupling constant , i.e. @xmath107 the @xmath108 dependence of @xmath74 is shown in fig.3 .
the @xmath108-dependence corresponds approximately to that of a monopole form with a mass scale parameter @xmath109 2 gev .
it has long been known that the @xmath110nn coupling is strongly underpredicted in the quark model as seen from the unexpectedly large value for the @xmath111nn coupling extracted from data analyses in @xcite .
comparison of our result from eq .
( 3.6 ) shows that the numerical value for @xmath74 associated with the @xmath3 triangle diagram agrees fairly well with the empirical estimate given in eq .
( 2.17 ) . consequently , in spite of the small decay width of the @xmath2 meson the coupling constant in the @xmath12 vertex seems to be completely exhausted by the contribution of the @xmath3 triangle diagram .
+ the result that the empirical value for that coupling constant can be explained by the @xmath112 triangle diagram alone shows that the meson model is able to predict realistic results for reactions that involve the coupling of the @xmath113 system to nucleons .
+ using the experimental value of @xmath71 from @xcite the value of @xmath114 is obtained as @xmath115 which is compatible with the size of @xmath116 obtained by means of the ksfr relation .
this suggests that the vector meson dominance model may be applied in the case of isoscalar axial vector currents . + * acknowledgements * 99 y. nambu , phys . rev .
* 106 * ( 1957 ) 1366 w. r. frazer and j. r. fulco , phys
* 117 * ( 1960 ) 1609 j. j. sakurai , ann .
* 11 * ( 1960 ) 1 s. i. dolinski et al .
, phys . rep .
* 202 * ( 1991 ) 101 v.i ogievetsky and b. m. zupnik , nucl .
* b24 * ( 1970 ) 612 m. hjorth
jensen , m. kirchbach , k. tsushima , and d. o. riska , nucl .
a563 * ( 1993 ) 525 m. kirchbach and h. arenhvel , proc .
int . conf . on physics with gev particle beams , jlich , 2225 august , 1994 , germany , world scientific ( 1995 ) , in press s. weinberg , phys .
18 * ( 1967 ) 507 m. m. nagels , t. a. rijken and j. j. de swart , phys . rev .
* d12 * ( 1975 ) 744 r. l. jaffe , phys.lett . * b229 * ( 1989 ) 275 t. d. cohen , h. forkel , and m. nielsen , phys.lett . * b316 * ( 1993 ) 1 t. bolton et al . , phys . lett .
* b278 * ( 1992 ) 495 m. a. shifman et al .
, nucl . phys . * b147 * ( 1979 ) 448 j. ellis and m. karliner , phys . lett .
* b313 * ( 1993 ) 131 c. elster , k. holinde , and r. machleidt , phys.rept .
* 149 * ( 1987 ) 149 review of particle properties , phys
* d50 * ( 1994 ) 1173 h. genz and g. hhler , phys . lett . * 61b * ( 1976 ) 389 fig .
1 ( a ) @xmath13 exchange contribution to @xmath117 , ( b)@xmath90 exchange contribution to @xmath118 . + fig .
2 the @xmath112 triangle diagram contribution to the @xmath13-nucleon coupling . + fig .
3 the momentum dependence of the @xmath112 triangle diagram contribution to the @xmath17 coupling @xmath119 .
the units of @xmath108 are @xmath120 .
|
for chiral symmetry strong interaction two low mass vector meson nonets with opposite parities vector mesons role in electromagnetic structure baryons @xmath4 @xmath5 mesons parametrize isovector isoscalar electromagnetic formfactors nucleon di)pole forms vector meson dominance vmd idea extended to axial isovector form factor nucleon illustrated by vector meson lagrangian in ref.@xcite charged weak vector axial vector nucleon form factors expressed as pole terms masses @xmath6 @xmath7 of @xmath4 @xmath8 mesons couplings to external @xmath11 weak current extend vmd hypothesis to isoscalar axial form factor nucleon model for @xmath12 coupling constant paper organized section 2 calculate weak decay couplings of @xmath2 mesons exploit vmd derive relations between hadronic semileptonic couplings section 3 calculate contribution @xmath16 triangle diagram to @xmath17 vertex importance for coupling nucleon to external isoscalar axial vector current paper ends with short summaryneutral weak axial current nucleon @xmath18 determined by matrix element isotriplet singlet octet quark currents @xmath23 flavour triplet @xmath24 up down strange quark fields vmd hypothesis implies field current identities @xmath25 @xmath26 isotriplet octet singlet octet isoscalar axial vector mesons @xmath29 decay constants hypothesis allows relations between hadronic semileptonic couplings describing @xmath30 annihilation coupling constant @xmath31 chain @xmath32 expression relation between pion weak decay coupling constant @xmath34 coupling constant @xmath35 hypothetical weak decay reaction @xmath36 evaluation short range meson exchange currents nuclear muon capture reactions lagrangian density @xmath38 @xmath39 external weak axial lepton current meson nonrelativistic quark model leads relation between decay constants : @xmath40 numerical value @xmath41 determined by second weinberg sum rule @xcite @xmath42 @xmath9 ksfr relation @xmath43 @xmath34 pion decay constant2.2 ) allows expression couplings @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath41 leads to numerical values @xmath46 current coupling model meson - nucleon vertices described by lagrangians @xmath47 quark model wave functions low vector mesons linear combinations quark antiquark @xmath48 pairs three dimensional flavour space physical isoscalar states vector axial vector meson nonets predicted mixed by ideal mixing angle @xmath49 states @xmath1 @xmath50 decouple equivalent suppression @xmath51 transitions rule decay @xmath52 meson into three pions chain @xmath53 represented by nonplanar diagrams suppressed by @xmath54 constants @xmath55 @xmath56 ideally mixed @xmath13 @xmath15 mesons given as @xmath57 couplings isoscalar axial vector mesons to lepton current equal couplings isocalar vector mesons relations obtained quark model @xcite @xmath58 @xmath59 experimental values physical mixing angle denoted @xmath60 ) extracted disagree with ideal difference small vector meson nonet @xmath61 )small @xmath62 mixing weak vector strangeness radius nucleon result in @xcite isoscalar weak vector current axial vector meson nonet non - ideal empirical mixing value @xmath63 @xcite wave functions isoscalar axial vector mesons mixing strange quarkonia are @xmath64 deviation mixing from ideal mixing angle due to strong nonperturbative effects isoscalar axial channel @xcite mixed isoscalar axial vector mesons replaced by @xmath65 mesons d(1285 ) and e(1420 ) important in @xmath66 annihilation neutrino scattering processes weak decay couplings @xmath67 mesons associated with quantities @xmath68 interpretation strong meson nucleon couplings obvious eq . ( 2.1 ) reduces to @xmath69 @xmath70 weak proton axial coupling constant @xmath71 weak isoscalar nucleon coupling coupling constants in @xmath12 @xmath73 vertices @xmath74 @xmath75 determined by @xmath1 components wave functions @xmath76 @xmath77 denotes coupling strange quarkonia to nucleonparity invariance symmetry interaction value @xmath78 vector meson equals value @xmath79 extracted data vector meson @xcite yields relation @xmath80 attributing f@xmath81(1285)nn coupling @xmath3 triangle diagram dominant contribution axial nucleon coupling empirical value coupling @xmath1 quarkonium nucleon understood @xmath83 triangle diagram contribution @xmath13-nucleon coupling @xmath74 form factor calculated @xmath84 lagrangian ( 2.5 ) lagrangians @xmath85 @xmath86 couplings @xmath88 @xmath89 denote pseudovector @xmath90nn scalar @xmath91 coupling constants adopt values @xmath92 @xmath93 values implied semiphenomenological bonn boson exchange model nucleon - nucleon interaction @xcite define effective d - nucleon vertex scalar product axial vector current nucleon @xmath2 field product @xmath96 equals quantity @xmath74 @xmath97 regularize integral triangle diagrams monopole formfactors @xmath90nn @xmath98nn vertices potential model @xcitetwo triangle diagrams to dnn vertex @xmath99 mass parameters monopole vertex factors values 1.3 2.0 gev function @xmath102 defined as @xmath103 dnn coupling constant setting @xmath104 in eq . ( 3.4 ) @xmath105 expression ( 3.4 ) imaginary part d - meson on shell @xmath106 value 5.7 decay width real part 3.4 ) @xmath104 1.9 value dnn coupling constant @xmath107 @xmath108 dependence of @xmath74 in fig.3 corresponds monopole form mass scale parameter @xmath109 2 gev @xmath110nn coupling underpredicted in quark model large value data analyses eq ( 3.6 ) numerical value for @xmath74 @xmath3 triangle diagram agrees with empirical estimate eq . ( 2.17 ) small decay width @xmath2 meson coupling constant in @xmath12 vertex exhausted by contribution @xmath3 triangle diagram empirical value coupling constant explained by @xmath112 triangle diagram meson model results for reactions coupling @xmath113 system to nucleonsusing experimental value @xmath71 @xmath114 obtained @xmath115 compatible @xmath116 ksfr relation suggests vector meson dominance model isoscalar axial vector currents acknowledgements 99 y nambu phys . rev. 106 1957 ) 1366 frazer j fulco phys 117 1960 ) 1609 sakurai 11 1960 dolinski . . rep. 202 1991 ) 101 ogievetsky zupnik b24 1970 ) 612 hjorth jensen kirchbach tsushima riska a563 1993 ) 525 kirchbach arenhvel conf. physics gev particle beams 2225 august 1994 germany scientific 1995 weinberg phys . 18 1967 ) 507 nagels rijken de swart phys rev d12 1975 ) 744 l. jaffe phys.lett b229 1989 ) 275 t d. cohen h forkel m nielsen phys.lett b316 1993 ) t bolton et al . phys . b278 1992 ) 495 shifman al . phys. b147 1979 ) 448 j. ellis m.karliner phys . lett b313 1993 ) 131 c elster holinde machleidt phys 149 1987 ) review particle properties d50 1994 ) 1173 h. genz hhler phys 61b 1976 ) 389 fig 1 @xmath13 @xmath117@xmath90 @xmath118 2 @xmath112 triangle @xmath13-nucleon coupling 3 momentum dependence @xmath112 @xmath17 coupling @xmath119 units @xmath108 @xmath120
| 0.503314
| 3,265
| 1,754
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,663
|
in this paper , we establish some integral inequalities for functions whose second derivatives in absolute value are @xmath0 convex
. corresponding author ]
|
the following inequality is well known in the literature as the hermite - hadamard integral inequality:@xmath1 where @xmath2 is a convex function on the interval @xmath3 of real numbers and @xmath4 with @xmath5 in @xcite , v.g .
mihean introduced the class of @xmath6convex functions as the following : the function @xmath7\rightarrow % tcimacro{\u{211d } } % % beginexpansion \mathbb{r } % endexpansion $ ] is said to be @xmath6convex , where @xmath8^{2 } , $ ] if for every @xmath9 $ ] and @xmath10 $ ] we have@xmath11 note that for @xmath12 one obtains the following classes of functions : increasing , @xmath13starshaped , starshaped , @xmath14convex , convex and @xmath15convex .
denote by @xmath16 the set of all @xmath6convex functions on @xmath17 $ ] which @xmath18 for recent results and generalizations concerning @xmath14convex and @xmath0 convex functions see @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . in @xcite , m. emin zdemir ,
merve avci and erhan set used the following lemma in order to establish some inequalities for @xmath14 convex functions .
[ lemma 1.1 ] let @xmath19 be a twice differentiable mapping on @xmath20 with @xmath21 and @xmath22.$ ] then the following equality holds:@xmath23 in the same paper @xcite , zdemir et al . discussed the following new results connecting with @xmath14convex functions : [ teo 1.1 ] let @xmath24 where @xmath25 be a twice differentiable function on @xmath20 with @xmath21 and suppose that @xmath26.$ ] if @xmath27 is @xmath28 convex on @xmath29 $ ] for some fixed @xmath30 and @xmath31 $ ] then the following inequality holds:@xmath32where @xmath33 [ co 1.1 ] with the above assumptions given that @xmath34 on @xmath29,$ ] and @xmath35 we have the inequality@xmath36 in @xcite , sarikaya and aktan obtained the following result concerning hermite - hadamard s inequality for functions whose second derivative in absolute value is convex as follows : [ teo 1.2]let @xmath37 be an open interval , @xmath4 with @xmath21 and @xmath38 be twice differentiable mapping such that @xmath39 is integrable and @xmath40 if @xmath41 is a convex function on @xmath29,$ ] then the following inequalities hold:@xmath42 , \\ \\
\frac{\left ( b - a\right ) ^{2}\left ( 3\lambda -1\right ) } { 48}\left [ \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a)\right\vert + \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( b)\right\vert \text { } \right ] , \text { \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ for } \frac{1}{2}\leq \lambda \leq 1.% \end{array}% \right.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in theorem [ teo 1.2 ] , if we choose @xmath43 we have@xmath44 .
\label{0}\ ] ] the aim of this paper is to establish some inequalities like those given in @xcite , but now for @xmath6convex functions .
that is , this study is a continuation of @xcite . in order to obtain our results ,
we modified lemma [ lemma 1.1 ] given in the @xcite@xmath45
[ lemma 2.1 ] let @xmath2 be a twice differentiable mapping on @xmath47 where @xmath4 with @xmath48 and @xmath31.$ ] if @xmath49,$ ] then the following equality holds:@xmath50 [ teo 2.1 ] let @xmath51\rightarrow % tcimacro{\u{211d } } % % beginexpansion \mathbb{r } % endexpansion $ ] be a differentiable mapping on @xmath52 such that @xmath26 $ ] where @xmath53 @xmath54 with @xmath55 @xmath56 if @xmath57 is @xmath6convex on @xmath58 $ ] for @xmath59^{2},$ ] @xmath60 then the following inequality holds:@xmath61 ^{\frac{1}{q}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] suppose that @xmath62 from lemma [ lemma 2.1 ] and using the @xmath6convexity of @xmath63 we have@xmath64 dt \notag \\ & = & \frac{\left ( mb - a\right ) ^{2}}{2}\left [ \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a)\right\vert \frac{1}{\left ( \alpha + 2\right ) \left ( \alpha + 3\right ) } % + m\left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a)\right\vert \left ( \frac{1}{6}-\frac{1}{% \left ( \alpha + 2\right ) \left ( \alpha + 3\right ) } \right ) \right ] \notag\end{aligned}\]]which completes the proof for @xmath62 suppose now that @xmath65 from lemma [ lemma 2.1 ] and using the hlder s integral inequality for @xmath66 we have@xmath67 ^{1-\frac{1}{q}}% \left [ \int_{0}^{1}\left ( t - t^{2}\right ) \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( ta+m(1-t)b)\right\vert ^{q}dt\right ] ^{\frac{1}{q } } \label{2}\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath68 since @xmath27 is @xmath6 convex on @xmath29 $ ] we know that for every @xmath10$]@xmath69from ( [ 1])-([3 ] ) we have@xmath70 ^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left [ \int_{0}^{1}\left ( t - t^{2}\right ) \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( ta+m(1-t)b)\right\vert ^{q}dt% \right ] ^{\frac{1}{q } } \\ & \leq & \frac{\left ( mb - a\right ) ^{2}}{2}\left [ \int_{0}^{1}\left ( t - t^{2}\right ) dt\right ] ^{1-\frac{1}{q } } \\ & & \times \left [ \int_{0}^{1}\left ( t - t^{2}\right ) \left [ t^{\alpha } \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a)\right\vert ^{q}+m\left ( 1-t^{\alpha } \right ) \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( b)\right\vert ^{q}\right ] dt\right ] ^{% \frac{1}{q } } \\ & = & \frac{\left ( mb - a\right ) ^{2}}{2}\left ( \frac{1}{6}\right ) ^{1-\frac{1}{q}% } \\ & & \times \left [ \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a)\right\vert ^{q}\frac{1}{% \left ( \alpha + 2\right ) \left ( \alpha + 3\right ) } + m\left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( b)\right\vert ^{q}\left ( \frac{1}{6}-\frac{1}{\left ( \alpha + 2\right ) \left ( \alpha + 3\right ) } \right ) \right ] ^{\frac{1}{q}}\end{aligned}\]]which is the required . from lemma [ lemma 2.1 ] and
using the hlder s integral inequality , we obtain@xmath74 dt\right ) ^{\frac{1}{q } } \\ & = & \frac{\left ( mb - a\right ) ^{2}}{2}\left ( \frac{2^{-1 - 2p}\sqrt{\pi } \gamma \left ( 1+p\right ) } { \gamma \left ( \frac{3}{2}+p\right ) } \right ) ^{\frac{1}{p}% } \left ( \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a)\right\vert ^{q}\frac{1}{\alpha + 1}% + m\left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( b)\right\vert ^{q}\left ( \frac{\alpha } { % \alpha + 1}\right ) \right ) ^{\frac{1}{q } } \\ & = & \frac{\left ( mb - a\right ) ^{2}}{2}\frac{\left ( \sqrt{\pi } \right ) ^{\frac{1% } { p}}}{2^{\frac{1}{p}}2^{2}}\left ( \frac{\gamma \left ( 1+p\right ) } { \gamma \left ( \frac{3}{2}+p\right ) } \right ) ^{\frac{1}{p}}\left ( \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a)\right\vert ^{q}\frac{1}{\alpha + 1}+m\left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( b)\right\vert ^{q}\left ( \frac{\alpha } { \alpha + 1}\right ) \right ) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\end{aligned}\]]and since @xmath75 we have@xmath76where @xmath68 [ teo 2.3 ] let @xmath51\rightarrow % tcimacro{\u{211d } } % % beginexpansion \mathbb{r } % endexpansion $ ] be a differentiable mapping on @xmath52 such that @xmath26 $ ] where @xmath53 @xmath54 with @xmath55 @xmath56 if @xmath57 is @xmath6 convex on @xmath58 $ ] for @xmath59^{2},$ ] @xmath66 @xmath84 then the following inequality holds:@xmath85 from lemma [ lemma 2.1 ] and using the well known hlder s integral inequality we have@xmath86 dt\right ) ^{% \frac{1}{q } } \\ & = & \frac{\left ( mb - a\right ) ^{2}}{2}\left ( \frac{1}{p+1}\right ) ^{\frac{1}{p}% } \\ & & \times \left ( \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a)\right\vert ^{q}\beta \left ( \alpha + 1,q+1\right ) + m\left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( b)\right\vert ^{q}\left ( \frac{1}{q+1}-\beta \left ( \alpha + 1,q+1\right ) \right ) \right ) ^{% \frac{1}{q}}.\end{aligned}\]]since @xmath87 we obtain@xmath88 [ teo 2.4 ] let @xmath51\rightarrow % tcimacro{\u{211d } } % % beginexpansion \mathbb{r } % endexpansion $ ] be a differentiable mapping on @xmath52 such that @xmath26 $ ] where @xmath53 @xmath54 with @xmath55 @xmath56 if @xmath57 is @xmath6 convex on @xmath58 $ ] for @xmath59^{2},$ ] and for some fixed @xmath60 then the following inequality holds:@xmath89 from lemma [ lemma 2.1 ] and using the well - known power - mean integral inequality we have@xmath90 dt\right ) ^{% \frac{1}{q } } \\ & = & \frac{\left ( mb - a\right ) ^{2}}{2}\left ( \frac{1}{2}\right ) ^{1-\frac{1}{q}% } \\ & & \times \left ( \left ( \left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a)\right\vert ^{q}\beta \left ( \alpha + 2,q+1\right ) + m\left\vert f^{\prime \prime } ( b)\right\vert ^{q}\left
( \frac{1}{\left ( q+1\right ) \left ( q+2\right ) } -\beta \left ( \alpha + 2,q+1\right ) \right ) \right ) \right ) ^{\frac{1}{q}}\end{aligned}\]]which completes the proof .
bakula , m.e .
zdemir and j. peari , hadamard type inequalities for @xmath14convex and @xmath0convex functions , j. inequal . pure and appl . math .
, 9(2008 ) , article 96 .
[ online : http://jipam.vu.edu.au ] m. klarii bakula , j. peari and m. ribii , companion inequalities to jensen s inequality for @xmath14convex and @xmath91convex functions , j. inequal .
pure and appl .
, 7(2006 ) , article 194 .
[ online : http://jipam.vu.edu.au ]
|
inequality known hermite - hadamard integral inequality:@xmath1 @xmath2 convex function on interval @xmath3 real numbers @xmath4 with @xmath5 in @xcite mihean introduced @xmath6convex functions function @xmath7\rightarrow @xmath6convex @xmath8^{2 @xmath9 @xmath10@xmath11 @xmath12 obtains classes of functions : increasing @xmath13starshaped @xmath14convex @xmath15convex @xmath16 set all @xmath6convex functions on @xmath17 @xmath18 recent results generalizations @xmath14convex @xmath0 convex functions see @xcite zdemir avci erhan used lemma inequalities for @xmath14 convex functions @xmath19 twice differentiable mapping on @xmath20 with @xmath21 @xmath22 equality holds:@xmath23 discussed new results connecting with @xmath14convex functions @xmath24 @xmath25 twice differentiable function on @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath26.@xmath27 @xmath28 convex on @xmath29 fixed @xmath30 @xmath31 inequality holds:@xmath32where @xmath33 co 1.1 assumptions @xmath34 on @xmath29 @xmath35 inequality@xmath36 in @xcite sarikaya aktan result hermite - hadamard s inequality for functions second derivative convex teo 1.2 @xmath37 open interval @xmath4 @xmath21 @xmath38 twice differentiable mapping @xmath39 integrable @xmath40 @xmath41 convex function on @xmath29 inequalities hold:@xmath42\frac{\left ( b - a\right )}\left 3\lambda -1\right ) 48}\left\vert f^{\prime \prime\prime \text\right\frac{1}{2}\leq \lambda \leq 1.% \end{array}% \right.{aligned} theorem teo 1.2 choose @xmath43 have@xmath44 aim paper establish inequalities @xcite for @xmath6convex functions study continuation of @xciteobtain results modified lemma 1.1@xmath45 2.1 @xmath2 differentiable mapping @xmath47 @xmath4 @xmath48 @xmath31. @xmath49 equality holds:@xmath50 2.1 @xmath51\rightarrow beginexpansion endexpansion differentiable mapping @xmath52 @xmath26 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath6convex @xmath58 @xmath59^{2} @xmath60 inequality holds:@xmath61\frac{1}{q}}{aligned} @xmath62 from lemma 2.1 @xmath6convexity of @xmath63@xmath64\frac{\left - a\right ){2}}{2}\left\vert{\prime \right\vert \frac{1}{\alpha + 2\right )\alpha + 3\right )\vert\prime \vert\frac{1}{6}-\frac{1}{%\alpha + 2\right ) + 3\right{aligned} completes proof @xmath62 @xmath65 from lemma 2.1 hlder s integral inequality @xmath66@xmath67 ^{1-\frac{1}{q}}% {1} - t^{2}\right\vert\prime-t)b)\right\vert\frac{1}{q{2}{aligned} @xmath68 @xmath27 @xmath6 convex on @xmath29 every @xmath10$]@xmath69from 1])-([3 ]@xmath70 ^{1-\frac{1}{q}}\left{1} t - t^{2}\right )\vert{\prime +m(1-t)b)\right\vert}dt% \right\frac{1}{q }\frac{\left mb - a\right ){2}}{2}\left_{0}^{1}\left t - t^{2}\right ) dt{1-\frac{1}{q }{0}{1}\left t - t^{2}\right ){\alpha\vert\prime\right\vert{q}+m\left 1-t^{\alpha \right\prime\right{q}\right dt\right{% \frac{1}{q }\frac{\left mb - a\right ){2}}{2}\left\frac{1}{6}\right ){1-\frac{1}{q}%\vert{\prime\right\vert{q}\frac{1}{%\alpha + 2\right )\alpha + 3\right ){\prime\right\vert{q}\left\frac{1}{6}-\frac{1}{\left\alpha + 2\right )\alpha + 3\right{\frac{1}{q}}\end{aligned} required .lemma 2.1 hlder s inequality obtain@xmath74 dt\right\frac{1}{q }\frac{\left mb - a\right ){2}}{2}\frac{2^{-1 - 2p}{\pi\left 1+p\right )\frac{3}{2}+p\right )\frac{1}{p}%\vert{\prime\right\vert}\frac{1}{\alpha + 1}%\prime\right\vert{q}\left\frac{\alpha } \alpha + 1}\right{\frac{1}{q }\frac{\left mb - a\right ){2}}{2}\frac{\left{\pi }\right\frac{1% }^{\frac{1}{p}}2^{2}}\left{ 1+p\right )\frac{3}{2}+p\right )\frac{1}{p}}\left{\prime\right\vert}\frac{1}{\alpha + 1}+m\left\vert{\prime\right\vert{q}\left\frac{\alpha }\alpha + 1}\right ){\frac{1}{q}}\end{aligned} @xmath75 @xmath68 2.3 @xmath51\rightarrow tcimacro{211d beginexpansion\mathbb{r endexpansion differentiable mapping @xmath52 @xmath26 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath6 convex @xmath58 @xmath59^{2} @xmath66 @xmath84 inequality holds@xmath85 lemma 2.1 hlder s integral inequality@xmath86\right \frac{1}{q }\frac{\left\right{2}}{2}\left\frac{1}{p+1}\right\frac{1}{p}%\left\vert\prime\right\vert{q}\beta\alpha + 1,q+1\right )\left\vert\prime\right\vert{q}\left\frac{1}{q+1}-\beta\alpha + 1,q+1\right\right% \frac{1}{q}}.{aligned @xmath87 obtain@xmath88 2.4 @xmath51\rightarrow tcimacro{{211d beginexpansion\mathbb{r endexpansion differentiable mapping @xmath52 @xmath26 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath6 convex @xmath58 @xmath59^{2} fixed @xmath60 inequality holds@xmath89 lemma 2.1 power - mean integral inequality@xmath90 dt\right ){% \frac{1}{q }\frac{\left a\right ){2}}{2}\frac{1\right\frac{1}{q}%\left\vert f^{\prime\right\vert{q}\beta\alpha + 2,q+1\right )\vert\right\vert{q}\left{1} q+1\right q+2\right )\alpha + 2,q+1\right )\frac{1}{q}}\end{aligned} completes proof bakula zdemir peari hadamard type inequalities @xmath14convex @xmath0convex functions inequal pure appl math 9(2008 ) article 96http://jipam.vu.edu.au m. klarii bakula j. peari m. ribii inequalities jensen s inequality functions inequal pure appl 7(2006 article 194.vu.au
| 0.553426
| 3,123
| 1,868
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,667
|
we show that positive averaged acceleration @xmath0 obtained in ltb models through spatial averaging can require integration over a region beyond the event horizon of the central observer .
we provide an example of a ltb model with positive @xmath0 in which the luminosity distance @xmath1 does not contain information about the entire spatially averaged region , making @xmath0 unobservable .
since the cosmic acceleration @xmath2 is obtained from fitting the observed luminosity distance to a frw model we conclude that in general a positive @xmath0 in ltb models does not imply a positive @xmath2 .
|
high redshift luminosity distance measurements @xcite and wmap measurement @xcite of cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) interpreted in the framework of standard frw cosmological models have strongly disfavored a matter dominated universe , and strongly supported a dominant dark energy component , corresponding to a positive cosmological acceleration , which we will denote as @xmath2 ( not to be confused with the scale factor @xmath3 ) . as an alternative to dark energy
, it has been proposed @xcite that we may be at the center of a inhomogeneous isotropic universe described by a lemaitre - tolman - bondi ( ltb ) solution of einstein s fields equations , where spatial averaging over one expanding and one contracting region is producing a positive averaged acceleration @xmath0 .
another more general approach to map luminosity distance as a function of redshift @xmath1 to ltb models has been recently proposed @xcite , showing that an inversion method can be applied successfully to reproduce the observed @xmath1 .
the main point is that the luminosity distance is in general sensitive to the geometry of the space through which photons are propagating along light geodesics , and therefore arranging appropriately the geometry of a given cosmological model it is possible to reproduce a given @xmath1 . for frw models this
correspond to set constraints on @xmath4 and @xmath5 and for ltb models it allows to determine the functions @xmath6 .
the averaged acceleration @xmath0 on the other side is not directly related to @xmath2 , since this is obtained integrating the position dependent cosmological redshift along the light geodesics , while @xmath0 is the result of spatial averaging , and has no relation to the causal structure of the underlying space .
this crucial difference can make @xmath0 unobservable to a central observer @xmath7 when the scale of the spatial averaging is greater than its event horizon .
lemaitre - tolman - bondi solution can be written as @xcite as : @xmath8 where @xmath9 is a function of the time coordinate @xmath10 and the radial coordinate @xmath11 , @xmath12 is an arbitrary function of @xmath11 , and @xmath13 denotes the partial derivative of @xmath9 with respect to @xmath11 .
einstein s equations give : @xmath14 with @xmath15 being an arbitrary function of @xmath11 and the dot denoting the partial derivative with respect to @xmath10 .
the solution of eq .
( [ eq2 ] ) can be written parametrically by using a variable @xmath16 , as follows @xmath17 \ , , \\
\label{eq5 } t(\eta , r ) & = & \frac{m(r)}{- 2 e(r ) } \left [ \eta -\frac{1}{\sqrt{-2 e(r ) } } \sin \left(\sqrt{-2 e(r ) } \eta \right ) \right ] + t_{b}(r ) \
, , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath18 has been introduced to make clear the distinction between the two functions @xmath19 and @xmath20 which are trivially related by @xmath21 and @xmath22 is another arbitrary function of @xmath11 , called bang function , which corresponds to the fact that big - bang / crunches happen at different times in this space .
this inhomogeneity of the location of the singularities is the origin of the possible causal separation between the central observer and the spatially averaged region for models with positive @xmath23 .
we can introduce the following variables @xmath24 so that eq . ( [ eq1 ] ) and
the einstein equations ( [ eq2 ] ) and ( [ eq3 ] ) can be written in a form which is more similar to frw models @xmath25 \ , , \ ] ] @xmath26 the solution in eqs .
( [ eq4 ] ) and ( [ eq5 ] ) can now be written as @xmath27 \
\label{ltb soln2 t } t(\tilde{\eta},r ) & = & \frac{\rho_0(r)}{6k(r ) } \left [ \tilde{\eta } -\frac{1}{\sqrt{k(r ) } } \sin \left(\sqrt{k(r ) } \ , \tilde{\eta } \right ) \right ] + t_{b}(r ) \
, , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath28 .
following the standard averaging procedure @xcite we define the volume for a spherical domain , @xmath29 , as @xmath30 and the length associated to the domain as @xmath31 via which the deceleration parameter @xmath32 and the average acceleration @xmath0 ( not to be confused with the scale factor @xmath3 ) are defined as : @xmath33 the models studied in @xcite correspond to the following functions @xmath34 : @xmath35 after exploring the 9 parameters space they give three examples of ltb solutions with positive @xmath32 as shown in table i. .three examples of the domain acceleration . [
cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] is plotted for the model corresponding to row 2 of table i from @xcite . ] since @xmath36 and @xmath37 we can fix the following initial condition for @xmath19 : @xmath38 which clearly shows why @xmath39 is called bang function .
defining @xmath40 as the time in the first column of table i , i.e. the time at which @xmath41 , with @xmath32 being the value in the last column of the same table , we solved the light geodesics equation @xmath42 imposing the following initial conditions @xmath43 eq.([ini1 ] ) is the natural way to map these models into luminosity distance observations for a central observer which should receive the light rays at the time @xmath40 at which the averaged acceleration is positive . in other words
the time dependence of @xmath44 corresponds to the choice of initial conditions for the light geodesics used to compute the luminosity distance . solving the equation @xmath45 for the model corresponding to the second row of table
i we obtain @xmath46 , where @xmath47 is the upper limit of the volume averaging integral . in this context @xmath48
can be thought of as the comoving horizon , the maximum radial coordinate from which photons can reach the central observer @xmath7 at time @xmath40 . as it can be seen in fig .
[ fig : m2rrr ] at @xmath49 there is a singularity along the geodesic , corresponding to the fact that light can not reach the central observer at time @xmath40 from points at radial coordinate @xmath50 .
in fact , since @xmath39 is a decreasing function of r , photons emitted at @xmath50 will arrive at @xmath49 at time @xmath51 when a local singularity develops because @xmath52 since regions of the universe at radial coordinates greater than @xmath48 have never been in causal contact with @xmath7 at time @xmath40 , the scale at which @xmath32 is defined is beyond the region causally connected to @xmath7 .
therefore @xmath32 can not be detected from local observation of the luminosity distance which is used to define @xmath2 .
this result is not surprising since the spatial averaging procedure is insensitive to the causal structure of the underlying space .
the other models studied in @xcite do not show this causal behavior , but solving the geodesic equations and computing the luminosity distance using the same initial conditions adopted above it can be shown that they do not reproduce correctly the observed luminosity distance , but this goes beyond the scope of the present article , which is the study of the local observability of the averaged acceleration .
we will study the luminosity distance of these and other ltb models with positive @xmath0 , and the relation between @xmath32 and @xmath53 in another work . and
@xmath54 are plotted for model 2 of @xcite.at about @xmath48=0.03298 there is a singularity .
, title="fig : " ] and @xmath54 are plotted for model 2 of @xcite.at about @xmath48=0.03298 there is a singularity .
, title="fig : " ] is plotted for the model corresponding to row 2 of table i from @xcite . ] and the dashed curve shows the bang function @xmath39 . for @xmath55 @xmath39
is so small that it can not be distinguished from the horizontal zero axis . ]
this example shows how @xmath0 may not even be causally related to the local observation of @xmath1 , and gives a reverse example of the results obtained in @xcite , where it was studied a ltb model fitting the observed luminosity distance , consistent with a positive @xmath2 , but without positive averaged acceleration @xmath0 .
our results do not rule out ltb models as alternatives to dark energy since , since the inversion method @xcite allows to obtain the observed luminosity distance without any averaging , and some concrete examples derived independently have already been proposed @xcite .
we can conclude that the luminosity distance @xmath1 contains more information than the spatially averaged acceleration @xmath0 because the first is sensitive to the causal structure of the entire space - time while the second is the result of averaging only the spatial part of the geometry , making the relation between them in general not one - to - one .
our results confirm the general argument @xcite that the spatial averaging must be performed on comoving domains whose size coincides with the length scale at which homogeneity sets in , and not on domains which may be as large as or larger than the observable universe .
it is possible that writing the geodesics equation in a form consistent with the buchert averaged formalism could overcome the problem , but this would be just a formal solution , since light is propagating along the geodesics of the inhomogeneous space , not of the averaged one .
we showed that ltb models with positive averaged acceleration can require averaging on scales beyond the event horizon of the central observer . in these cases
@xmath0 is causally unrelated to @xmath2 which is obtained from the observed luminosity distance , showing that a positive averaged acceleration @xmath0 in ltb models is in general not equivalent to a positive @xmath2 .
this example shows how the averaging buchert @xcite formalism is not preserving the causal structure of space - time and can lead to the definition of locally unobservable averaged quantities .
the study of the constraints on the local observability of averaged quantities will be addressed in a more general way , not only in the context of ltb models , in a future work .
r. a. vanderveld , e. e. flanagan and i. wasserman , phys .
d * 74 * , 023506 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0602476 ] .
s. apostolopoulos , n. brouzakis , n. tetradis and e. tzavara , jcap * 0606 * , 009 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0603234 ] . t. kai , h. kozaki , k. i. nakao , y. nambu and c. m. yoo , arxiv : gr - qc/0605120 . c. h. chuang , j. a. gu and w. y. hwang , arxiv : astro - ph/0512651 .
a. g. riess _ et al .
_ [ supernova search team collaboration ] , astron .
j. * 116 * , 1009 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9805201 ] . s. perlmutter _ et al .
_ [ supernova cosmology project collaboration ] , astrophys .
j. * 517 * , 565 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9812133 ] .
d. j. h. chung and a. e. romano , phys .
d * 74 * , 103507 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0608403 ] .
e. w. kolb , s. matarrese and a. riotto , arxiv : astro - ph/0506534 .
d. palle , nuovo cim . * 117b * , 687 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0205462 ] . j. l. tonry _ et al . _
[ supernova search team collaboration ] , astrophys .
j. * 594 * , 1 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0305008 ] .
r. a. knop _ et al . _
[ the supernova cosmology project collaboration ] , astrophys .
j. * 598 * , 102 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0309368 ] .
b. j. barris _ et al .
_ , astrophys .
j. * 602 * , 571 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0310843 ] .
a. g. riess _ et al .
_ [ supernova search team collaboration ] , astrophys .
j. * 607 * , 665 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0402512 ] . c. l. bennett
_ et al . _ ,
astrophys .
j. suppl .
* 148 * , 1 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0302207 ] ; d. n. spergel _ et al . _
[ wmap collaboration ] , astrophys .
j. suppl .
* 148 * , 175 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0302209 ] .
d. n. spergel _ et al .
_ , arxiv : astro - ph/0603449 .
|
redshift luminosity distance measurements @xcite wmap cosmic microwave background models disfavored matter dominated universe supported dark energy component positive cosmological acceleration @xmath2 not with scale factor @xmath3 alternative to dark energy proposed center of inhomogeneous isotropic universe lemaitre - tolman - bondi solution spatial averaging over one expanding contracting region positive averaged acceleration @xmath0 approach to map luminosity distance function of redshift @xmath1 to ltb models proposed @xcite inversion method reproduce @xmath1 luminosity distance sensitive to geometry space photons light geodesics arranging geometry reproduce @xmath1 for frw models constraints on @xmath4 and @xmath5 ltb models determine functions @xmath6 averaged acceleration @xmath0 not directly related to @xmath2 obtained integrating position dependent cosmological redshift geodesics @xmath0 result of spatial averaging no relation to causal structure underlying space difference @xmath0 unobservable to central observer @xmath7 when scale spatial averaging greater than event horizonlemaitre - tolman - bondi solution written @xmath8 @xmath9 function time coordinate @xmath10 radial coordinate @xmath11 @xmath12 arbitrary function @xmath11 @xmath13 partial derivative @xmath9 einstein s equations give @xmath14 @xmath15 arbitrary function @xmath11 dot partial derivative @xmath10 solution eq . eq2 ] written parametrically variable @xmath16 @xmath17 \label{eq5 } t(\eta r ) \frac{m(r)}{- 2 e(r )\eta -{1\sqrt{-2 e(r ) e t_{b}(r ){aligned @xmath18 introduced distinction functions @xmath19 @xmath20 related @xmath21 @xmath22 arbitrary function @xmath11 bang function big - bang / crunches different times space inhomogeneity location singularities causal separation central observer spatially averaged region models positive @xmath23 introduce variables @xmath24 eq .eq1 ] ) einstein equations eq2 eq3 ] similar to frw models @xmath25 @xmath26 solution eqs eq4 eq5 ] written as @xmath27 \label{ltb soln2 t(\tilde{\eta},r ) \frac{\rho_0(r)}{6k(r ) }\left\tilde{\eta } -\frac{1{\sqrt{k(r )\left\sqrt{k(r )\tilde{\eta }\right + t_{b}(r )\end{aligned} @xmath28 standard averaging procedure volume spherical domain @xmath29 @xmath30 length @xmath31 deceleration parameter @xmath32 average acceleration @xmath0 scale factor @xmath3 defined @xmath33 models @xcite correspond to functions @xmath34 @xmath35 9 parameters three examples ltb solutions positive @xmath32 table i. examples domain acceleration cols=" " plotted model row 2 table i from @xcite @xmath36 @xmath37 fix initial condition for @xmath19 @xmath38 @xmath39 called bang functiondefining @xmath40 time first column table i @xmath41 @xmath32 last column solved light geodesics equation @xmath42 imposing initial conditions @xmath43 eq.([ini1 ] ) map models luminosity distance observations central observer light rays @xmath40 averaged acceleration positive time dependence @xmath44 corresponds initial conditions light geodesics luminosity distance solving equation @xmath45 second row table i @xmath46 @xmath47 upper limit volume averaging integral @xmath48 comoving horizon maximum radial coordinate photons reach central observer @xmath7 @xmath40 @xmath49 singularity along geodesic light not reach central observer @xmath40 from points radial coordinate @xmath50 @xmath39 decreasing function of r photons emitted @xmath50 arrive @xmath49 @xmath51 when local singularity develops @xmath52 regions radial coordinates greater @xmath48 never causal contact with @xmath7 @xmath40 @xmath32 defined beyond region causally connected @xmath7 @xmath32 detected from local observation luminosity distance @xmath2 spatial averaging procedure insensitive to causal structure underlying spaceother models studied in @xcite show causal behavior solving geodesic equations computing luminosity distance reproduce correctly observed luminosity distance beyond scope present article study local observability averaged acceleration study luminosity distance ltb models with positive @xmath0 relation between @xmath32 and @xmath53 another work @xmath54 plotted for model 2 @xcite @xmath48=0.03298 singularity model row 2 table i dashed curve shows bang function @xmath39 @xmath55 @xmath39 small distinguished from horizontal zero axis shows @xmath0 may not causally related to local observation of @xmath1 reverse example of results in @xcite ltb model fitting observed luminosity distance consistent with positive @xmath2 without positive averaged acceleration @xmath0 results rule out ltb models alternatives to dark energy inversion method @xcite allows observed luminosity distance without averaging concrete examples proposed @xcite luminosity distance @xmath1 contains more information than spatially averaged acceleration @xmath0 first sensitive to causal structure space - time second averaging only spatial part geometry relation not one - to - oneresults confirm argument spatial averaging on domains with length scale homogeneity not domains large observable universe writing geodesics equation with buchert averaged formalism could overcome problem formal light along geodesics inhomogeneous space not averaged ltb models with positive averaged acceleration require averaging scales beyond event horizon central observer @xmath0 causally unrelated to @xmath2 from observed luminosity distance positive averaged acceleration not equivalent to positive @xmath2 shows averaging buchert @xcite formalism causal structure space - time locally unobservable averaged quantities study constraints local observability averaged quantities addressed future work. vanderveld . flanagan. wasserman phys . d * 74 * , 023506 ( 2006 ) astro - ph/0602476 ] s. apostolopoulos n. brouzakis. tetradis. tzavara jcap * 0606 * 009 ( 2006 ) astro - ph/0603234 t. kai h. kozaki nakao nambu. yoo arxiv gr - qc/0605120. chuang j. gu y. hwang astro - ph/0512651riess supernova search team collaboration astron j 116 1009 ( 1998 ) astro - ph/9805201 perlmutter supernova cosmology project collaboration astrophys . j 517 565 ( 1999 ) astro - ph/9812133 h chung romano phys 74 103507 ( 2006 ) astro - ph/0608403 kolb matarrese a riotto astro - ph/0506534 cim 117b 687 ( 2002 ) astro - ph/0205462 ] tonry supernova search team collaboration astrophys . j 594 1 ( 2003 ) astro - ph/0305008 ] knop supernova cosmology project collaboration astrophys j 598 102 ( 2003 ) astro - ph/0309368 ] barris astrophys 602 571 ( 2004 ) astro - ph/0310843 ] riess supernova search team collaboration astrophys j 607 665 ( 2004 ) astro - ph/0402512 ] bennett astrophys . j 148 1 ( 2003 ) astro - ph/0302207 ] spergel wmap collaboration astrophys j 148 175 ( 2003 ) astro - ph/0302209spergel arxiv astro - ph/0603449
| 0.498676
| 3,180
| 1,658
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,683
|
1h0323 + 342 is one of narrow - line radio - loud seyfert 1 galaxies ( rl - nls1 ) , which is a new class of gamma - ray emitting agns .
narrow - line seyfert 1 galaxies ( nls1 ) have a small - mass black hole , but its mass accretion rate is almost as high as eddington limit .
therefore , by observing nls1s , we can know the evolution of supermassive black holes at the center of galaxies . some of nls1s are radio - loud and we call them rl - nls1 . from past observations ,
multi - wavelength spectrum of rl - nls1s is similar to that of typical blazars ; the synchrotron emission in the lower energy band up to the optical band , and inverse compton scattering of low energy photons from disk , torus , and broad line region .
x - ray band is a transittion region between the synchrotron and inverse compton , and also there is a possible disk / corona emission .
therefore , we studied the energy - dependence of time variability of the x - ray emission of 1h0323 + 342 , which have been observed by suzaku in 2009 and 2013 , in order to constrain the emission mechanism .
we found that the lower energy below 1 kev and the higher energy above 7 kev show a different variability from the middle energy band , indicating at least two emission components in the x - ray band .
x - ray spectrum is not a simple power - law , but requires an additional features ; a broken power - law plus flat hard component , or a power - law plus a relativistic reflection component . each spectral component seems to vary independently .
|
narrow - line seyfert 1 galaxy ( nls1 ) is a class of active galactic nuclei ( agn ) .
the width of optical emission lines is narrower than that of seyfert 1 galaxies , and nls1s do not exhihit strong x - ray absorption like seyfert 2 galaxy . in the x - ray spectrum , there is often a large soft - excess .
nls1s are identified by the following three characteristics .
1 . fwhm ( h@xmath0 ) @xmath1 2000 kms@xmath2 ( goodrich 1989 ) 2 . @xmath3oiii@xmath4 $ ] / h@xmath5 3 ( osterbrock & pogge 1985 ) 3 .
strong permitted fe ii emission lines ( boroson & green 1992 ) nls1s have a small - mass black hole , but its mass accretion rate is almost as high as eddington limit ( marconi et al .
we can study the evolution of supermassive black holes at the center of galaxies by observing nls1s .
most of nls1s are radio - quiet ( r @xmath1 10 , r : radio loudness , ratio of 5 ghz radio to b - band flux densities ) ( kellermann et al . 1989 ) , but 7 @xmath6 of nls1s are radio - loud ( r @xmath7 10 ) and 2.5 @xmath6 are very radio - loud ( r @xmath7 100 ) ( komossa et al
. 2006 ) , and they are called as radio - loud narrow - line seyfert 1 galaxies ( rl - nls1 ) . with early fermi observation , gev gamma - ray emission has been discovered from pmn j0948 + 0022 , one of rl - nls1s ( abdo et al .
after that , gev gamma - ray emission was found from other three rl - nls1s ( abdo et al .
2009b ) , so it is found that rl - nls1s generally emit gev gamma - rays . from past observations ,
the multi - wavelength spectrum of rl - nls1 is similar to that of typical blazars ; the synchrotron emission in the lower energy band up to the optical band and the inverse compton scatterred x - ray and gamma - ray emission of low energy photons from disk , torus , and broad line region .
x - ray band is a transition region between the synchrotron and the inverse compton , and also there is a possible disk / corona emission . as described above , x - ray emission mechanism of rl - nls1s is uncertain .
therefore , we studied the energy - dependence of time variability of the x - ray emission of a rl - nls1s 1h 0323 + 342 , which have been observed by suzaku in 2009 and 2013 .
fig.[lc13 ] is a light curve of 1h 0323 + 342 observed by suzaku in 2013 .
1h 0323 + 342 varies with a time scale of several ks , but the soft x - ray band below 1 kev shows a independent behavior from the other bands .
fig.[multi ] shows correlations of count rates between 23 kev and other bands . the lower energy below 2 kev and the higher energy above 7 kev show a different variability from the middle energy band , suggesting that there are at least two spectral components in the x - ray band .
first , we fit the x - ray spectrum of 1h 0323 + 342 with the absorbed power - law model , but there remain redisuals at the higher and lower energy region ( @xmath8 = 1017.26/528 ) and thus the spectrum is not a simple power - law shape ( fig . [ redisual ] ) . to reduce the redisual in fig.[redisual ] , we added a broken power - law model this model of one hard power - law and one broken power - law represents a jet emission of inverse compton and synchrotron , respectively .
as in fig.[bkn09all ] and fig.[bkn13all ] , x - ray spectra can be fitted with this model for 2009 and 2013 ( table i ) .
the breaking energy becomes around 0.7 kev .
.fitting parameters of jet emission model in 2009 and 2013 [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] we also try to fit the spectra of two periods defined in fig [ lc13 ] with disk emission model , as jet emission model . as a result ,
a `` powerlaw '' component varied .
if disk model is correct , the variability is almost attributed to the disk / corona component and the reflection component is stable .
this behavior is similar to other seyfert galaxies .
we suggests that x - ray emission of 1h 0323 + 342 has at least two emission components , based on energy - dependence of time variability .
if the x - ray emission of 1h 0323 + 342 is dominated by jet emission , a variable component is a synchrotron , and it is similar to other blazers .
if the emission is dominated by disk / corona emission , disk / corona emission varies while disk reflection is stable , this is similar to seyfert galaxies .
we can not distinguish these two models by current data .
therefore an extensive study by astro - h observations with high energy resolution and good sensitivity in wide x - ray band is hopeful .
|
narrow - line seyfert 1 galaxy nls1 ) class active galactic nuclei width optical emission lines narrower than seyfert 1 galaxies strong x - ray absorption like seyfert 2 galaxy x - ray spectrum large soft - excess nls1s identified by three characteristics 1 fwhm (@xmath0 ) @xmath1 2000 kms@xmath2 2 @xmath3oiii@xmath4@xmath5 3 3 strong permitted fe ii emission lines nls1s have small - mass black hole mass accretion rate as high as eddington limit study evolution of supermassive black holes by observing nls1s most nls1s radio - quiet 7 @xmath6 radio - loud 2.5 @xmath6 very radio - loud 2006 called radio - loud narrow - line seyfert 1 galaxies rl - nls1 gev gamma - ray emission discovered from pmn j0948 + 0022 rl - nls1s found from other three rl - nls1s rl - nls1s generally emit gev gamma - rayspast observations multi - wavelength spectrum rl - nls1 similar blazars synchrotron emission lower energy band optical band inverse compton x - gamma - ray emission low energy photons from disk torus broad line x - ray band transition between synchrotron inverse compton possible disk / corona emission x - ray emission mechanism uncertain studied energy - dependence time variability x - ray emission 1h 0323 + 342 observed suzaku 2009 2013 fig light curve of 1h 0323 + 342 observed 2013 varies time scale soft x - ray band below 1 kev independent behavior fig correlations count rates between 23 kev other bands lower energy below 2 kev higher energy above 7 kev different variability from middle energy band two spectral components in x - ray band x - ray spectrum 1h 0323 + 342 with absorbed power - law model redisuals at higher lower energy region spectrum not simple power - law shape reduce added broken power - law model jet emission of inverse compton synchrotronx - ray spectra fitted with model 2009 2013 table breaking energy 0.7 kev parameters jet emission model 2009 2013 fit spectra two periods fig with disk emission model jet emission model powerlaw component varied if disk model correct variability to disk / corona reflection component stable similar to seyfert galaxies x - ray emission of 1h 0323 + 342 has two emission components energy - dependence time variability if dominated by jet emission variable component synchrotron similar to blazers dominated disk / corona emission varies disk reflection stable similar to seyfert galaxies distinguish models by current data extensive study astro - h observations high energy resolution good sensitivity wide x - ray band hopeful
| 0.186016
| 1,236
| 607
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,685
|
an extended bosonic coherent basis has been shown by chen _ et al _ @xcite to provide numerically exact solutions of the finite - size dicke model .
the advantages in employing this basis , as compared with the photon number ( fock ) basis , are exhibited to be valid for a large region of the hamiltonian parameter space and many excited states by analyzing the convergence in the wave functions .
pacs numbers : 3.65.fd , 42.50.ct , 64.70.tg
|
the dicke hamlitonian describes a system of @xmath0 two - level atoms interacting with a single monochromatic electromagnetic radiation mode within a cavity .
it is described in the accompanying article @xcite .
the purpose of this second part is to show that the benefits to employ the coherent basis are valid for a large region of the hamiltonian parameter space , not only to obtain converged values of the energy , but also for the wave function , for the ground state and for a significative part of the energy spectra .
it can be particularly useful to study the presence of chaos @xcite and of excited states phase transitions @xcite in this model .
the interaction between a system of @xmath0 two - level atoms and a single mode of a radiation field can be described by the dicke hamiltonian : @xmath1 the frequency of the radiation mode is @xmath2 , which has an associated number operator @xmath3 . for the atomic part @xmath4
is the excitation energy , meanwhile @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 , are collective atomic pseudo - spin operators which obey the su(2 ) algebra .
it holds that if @xmath8 is the eigenvalue of @xmath9 , then @xmath10 defines the symmetric atomic subspace which includes the ground state .
the interaction parameter @xmath11 depends principally on the atomic dipolar moment .
we compare the minimal truncation needed to obtain convergence of the solution , using the two basis defined in ref .
@xcite : the coherent basis @xmath12 and the fock basis @xmath13 .
the wave functions , expanded in the truncated fock ( f ) and coherent ( c ) basis are , for a given @xmath14 : @xmath15 where @xmath16 for @xmath17 , and @xmath18 for @xmath19 , and @xmath20 enumerates the eigenstates ordered by their energies @xmath21 with @xmath22 assigned to the ground state .
the probability @xmath23 of having @xmath24 photons in the @xmath25-th state in the fock basis , or @xmath26 of having @xmath27 excitations in the coherent basis is : @xmath28 where @xmath29 for @xmath30 , respectively .
the ground state probability distribution @xmath31 is shown as a function of @xmath24 or @xmath27 up to @xmath32 or @xmath33 , for @xmath34 and @xmath35 , and @xmath36 in figs .
[ fig1 ] and [ fig2 ] .
both wave functions were calculated with the truncation necessary to have the energy converged with @xmath37 . from fig .
[ fig1 ] and [ fig2 ] it is clear that many components which contributes very little to the wave function must be included in the calculations to obtain the desired precision in the ground state energy . it can also be observed in the figures that for @xmath34 , which is @xmath38 in this case , the largest probability is to have no photons in the fock basis , or no excitations in the coherent basis .
the situation is different in the superradiant region , @xmath39 , where in the fock basis the distribution of photons resembles a gaussian curve , with its maximum at a photon number proportional to the number of atoms , while in the coherent basis the probability of having zero excitations remains dominant .
this is the power of the coherent basis , which allows to obtain numerically exact ground state wave functions for numbers of atoms which are intractable in the fock basis . to study the convergence in the wave function we define its precision @xmath40 @xcite as @xmath41 where @xmath29 for @xmath30 , respectively .
this @xmath42 criteria demands less computing resources than the @xmath43 criteria @xcite , because it requires only the information about one truncation value ( @xmath44 ) instead of two .
[ fig3 ] displays the plots of @xmath45 as a function of @xmath32 , and of @xmath46 as a function of @xmath33 . a linear fit , for @xmath47
give us the following relation between @xmath33 and @xmath48 : @xmath49
in this section we extend the analysis to the excited states . to accurately evaluate a significative part of the energy spectrum
is a necessary ingredient in the study of quantum chaos @xcite and of excited state quantum phase transitions ( esqpt ) @xcite . in figure [ fig4 ]
we display plots of @xmath42 as a function of the state @xmath25 , for @xmath47 , @xmath34 , @xmath50 , @xmath51 and @xmath52 . in the upper figures we show the @xmath53 and in the lower ones @xmath48 . on the left
the vertical scale is linear and all states are listed in the horizontal axis , while on the right hand side the vertical scale is logarithmic and only the 150 states with lower energies are included .
the horizontal green line depicts the tolerance @xmath54 . of all states as a function of the state number .
details are given in the text.,title="fig : " ] of all states as a function of the state number .
details are given in the text.,title="fig : " ] of all states as a function of the state number .
details are given in the text.,title="fig : " ] of all states as a function of the state number .
details are given in the text.,title="fig : " ] it is indeed remarkable to observe in fig .
[ fig4 ] that a few hundred states calculated in the coherent basis have their wave function converged , and @xmath55 , for these states , grows in a smooth and nearly monotonous way as a function of the @xmath25 index .
this is not the case in the fock basis , where @xmath56 fluctuates by orders of magnitude between a given state and the following one .
it is worth to compare the convergence criteria based in the wave function and described above , with the more standard convergence in energy , which was described in the previous article @xcite . in figure [ fig5 ]
we show @xmath48 versus @xmath57 for the first 250 excited states , @xmath25 , whose energies converged in the coherent basis with @xmath58 .
vs @xmath57 for the first 250 states , which convergence is under @xmath59 . ]
a linear fit of these data results in @xmath60=0.71077 - 1.10337\,\,log_{10}\left[\delta e_{c}(k)\right ] \\ & \rightarrow \,\,\ , \delta p_{c}=0.19464\,\ , \left[\delta e_{c}(k)\right]^ { 1.10337 } \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the number of states whose @xmath42 is smaller than a tolerance @xmath54 for @xmath61 and @xmath32 given for the fock basis and @xmath33 for the coherent basis is presented in table [ tab2 : ] .
the two tolerances selected are @xmath62 and @xmath59 , with @xmath34 and @xmath63 .
the advantages associated with the use of the coherent basis are even more clear in this case , because the number of states whose wave function has converged with the selected tolerance is larger than those whose energies have converged .
it should be mentioned , however , that the tolerances in @xmath42 are absolute , because its best case value of a fully converged state is zero , and the worst situation , for completely different wave functions , is one . on the contrary ,
the energy scale is arbitrary , and can have positive and negative values , even some levels with energies very close to zero .
it makes the use of the relative error employed in ref @xcite dangerous when the reference energy is very small .
but for excited states a fixed value of @xmath54 implies the need of more precise digits in the calculated energy , making more difficult the convergence for higher energies .
for this reason our @xmath43 criteria is more stringent than the @xmath42 one : every excited state with converged energy has guaranteed the convergence of its wave function . as the coherent basis provides many converged states with a single truncation value , it is promising to study the presence of excited states quantum phase transitions ( esqpt ) , predicted in dicke - like systems and spin systems for @xmath11 values deeply in the superradiant phase @xcite .
to obtain the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the dicke hamiltonian for a finite number of atoms it is necessary to perform a numerical diagonalization , employing a truncated boson number space .
two basis , associated with the two integrable limits of the hamiltonian , are used along this work . in the present article
we have shown that , in most of the hamiltonian s parameter regions including the qpt , the coherent basis requires a significative smaller truncation .
we extended the analysis to the convergence in the wave function , exhibiting both convergence criteria as equivalent , and presented the numerical relationships between them .
the study of the probability distributions of the number of bosons was helpful in understanding the differences between the two basis , and the advantages of the coherent basis .
the convergence of the energies and the wave functions was also investigated for the excited states , showing that the coherent basis is very powerful also in this case , allowing to obtain hundreds of converged states with a single truncation value .
this findings can be very useful in order to observe the presence of quantum chaos around the phase transition , as well as to study the excited states quantum phase transitions .
we thank o. castaos , r. lpez - pea and e. nahmad for many useful and interesting conversations.this work was partially supported by conacyt - mxico and papiit - unam 102811 .
99 chen q h , zhang y y , liu t and wang k l 2008 _ phys . rev .
a _ * 78 * 051801 ; liu t , zhang y y , chen q h and wang k l 2009 _ phys .
rev . a _ * 80 * 165308 bastarrachea - magnani m a and hirsch j g , this proceedings .
emary c and brandes t 2003 _ phys .
e _ * 67 * 066203 ; 2003 _ phys .
lett . _ * 90 *
044101 lambert n , emary c and brandes t 2005 _ phys .
lett . _ * 92 * 073602 prez - fernndez p , cejnar p , arias j m , dukelsky j , garca - ramos j e , and relao a 2011 _ phys .
a _ * 83 * 033802 prez - fernndez p , relao a , arias j m , cejnar p , dukelsky j , and garca - ramos j e 2011 _ phys . rev
* 83 * 046208 bastarrachea - magnani m a and hirsch j g 2011 _ rev .
s _ * 57 * 0069 ; _ ibid _ 2012 _ aip conf .
proc . _ * 1488 * 418 ; _ ibid _ 2013 _ aip conf .
|
dicke hamlitonian describes system @xmath0 two - level atoms interacting single monochromatic electromagnetic radiation mode cavity described article @xcite second part benefits coherent basis large region hamiltonian parameter space converged values energy wave function ground state energy spectra useful study chaos excited states phase transitions interaction between @xmath0 two - level atoms single mode radiation field described dicke hamiltonian @xmath1 frequency radiation mode is @xmath2 associated number operator @xmath3 @xmath4 excitation energy @xmath5 @xmath6 collective atomic pseudo - spin operators su(2 ) algebra @xmath8 eigenvalue @xmath9 @xmath10 defines atomic subspace ground state interaction parameter @xmath11 depends on atomic dipolar moment compare minimal truncation convergence using two basis defined @xcite coherent basis @xmath12 fock basis @xmath13 wave functions expanded truncated fock coherent ( c ) basis @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath18 enumerates eigenstates ordered by energies @xmath21 @xmath22 assigned ground stateprobability @xmath23 @xmath24 photons @xmath25-th state fock basis or @xmath26 @xmath27 excitations coherent basis is @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 ground state probability distribution @xmath31 function of @xmath24 to @xmath32 @xmath34 @xmath36 in figs fig1 and fig2 ] wave functions calculated with truncation energy with @xmath37 many components wave function must included calculations desired precision ground state energy @xmath34 largest probability no photons fock basis or no excitations coherent basis different in superradiant region @xmath39 , fock basis distribution photons resembles gaussian curve maximum photon number proportional to number atoms coherent basis probability zero excitations dominant power coherent basis allows exact ground state wave functions for numbers atoms intractable fock basis study convergence wave function define precision @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath42 criteria demands less computing resources than @xmath43 criteria requires information one truncation value ( @xmath44 ) twofig3 ] displays plots @xmath45 function @xmath32 @xmath46 function @xmath33 linear fit for @xmath47 relation between @xmath33 @xmath48 : @xmath49 extend analysis to excited states evaluate significative part energy spectrum necessary in study quantum chaos @xcite excited state quantum phase transitions figure [ fig4 ] plots @xmath42 function state @xmath25 @xmath47 @xmath34 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 upper figures show @xmath53 lower @xmath48 left vertical scale linear all states listed in horizontal axis right side vertical scale logarithmic 150 states with lower energies included horizontal green line depicts tolerance @xmath54 all states function of state number details in text. all states function state number details text states function state number details text remarkable observe in fig . fig4 ] few hundred states calculated coherent basis have wave function converged @xmath55 grows smooth monotonous function @xmath25 index not case in fock basis @xmath56 fluctuates orders magnitude between state followingcompare convergence criteria wave function with standard convergence in energy described in previous article @xcite figure fig5 @xmath48 versus @xmath57 first 250 states @xmath25 energies converged coherent basis with @xmath58 @xmath57 first 250 states under @xmath59 linear fit results in @xmath60=0.71077 - 1.10337 p}=0.19464 1.10337 number of states whose @xmath42 smaller than tolerance @xmath54 for @xmath61 and @xmath32 fock basis @xmath33 coherent basis presented in table tab2 two tolerances selected are @xmath62 and @xmath59 with @xmath34 and @xmath63 advantages coherent basis clear number of states wave function converged with selected tolerance larger than energies converged tolerances in @xmath42 absolute best case value fully converged state is zero worst situation one energy scale arbitrary can have positive and negative values close to zero relative error in ref @xcite dangerous when reference energy smallexcited states fixed value @xmath54 implies precise digits difficult convergence for higher energies @xmath43 criteria stringent than @xmath42 every excited state converged energy guaranteed convergence wave function coherent basis provides converged states single truncation value promising to study excited states quantum phase transitions dicke - like systems spin systems for @xmath11 values superradiant phase @xcite obtain eigenvalues eigenvectors dicke hamiltonian for finite atoms numerical diagonalization truncated boson number space two basis two integrable limits hamiltonian used parameter regions coherent basis requires smaller truncation extended analysis to convergence wave function presented numerical relationships study probability distributions of number bosons differences between two basis advantages coherent basis convergence of energies wave functions investigated for excited states coherent basis powerful hundreds of converged states with single truncation value useful observe quantum chaos phase transition study excited states quantum phase transitions thank o. castaos r. lpez - pea e. nahmad for conversations work supported by conacyt - mxico papiit - unam 102811chen q h zhang y y liu t wang k 2008 phys . rev 78 * 051801 2009 phys rev 80 * 165308 bastarrachea - magnani m hirsch j g proceedings emary c brandes t 2003 phys 67 * 066203 90 * 044101 lambert n emary c brandes t 2005 phys 92 * 073602 prez - p cejnar arias j dukelsky j garca - ramos j relao 2011 phys 83 * 033802 fernndez dukelsky garca - ramos j 2011 83 * 046208 bastarrachea - magnani m a hirsch j g 2011 57 * 0069 ibid 2012 conf proc 1488 * 418 2013
| 0.354905
| 2,473
| 1,282
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,689
|
in the first born approximation and using an elliptically polarized laser field , the mott scattering of an electron by a coulomb potential is investigated using the dirac - volkov states to describe the incident and scattered electrons .
the results obtained are compared with the results of s.m .
li _
et al _
@xcite for the case of a linearly polarized laser field and with the results of y. attaourti _
et al _
@xcite for the case of a circular polarization .
+ + pacs number(s ) : 34.80.qb , 12.20.ds = 18.6pt plus 0.2pt minus 0.1pt
|
in this note , we give definite analytical results concerning the process of mott scattering in the presence of a strong laser field and compare our results to previous theoretical works , namely the work of s.m .
et al _ @xcite and the work of y. attaourti _
et al _ @xcite .
we hope this contribution will be useful to all researchers working in this field and will bring an end to the controversy raised by the expression found by c. szymanowski _
@xcite for the case of a circular polarization of the laser field .
an analytical expression for the spin - unpolarized differential cross section is derived using trace calculations .
the electric field strength as well as the frequency of the laser field and the kinetic energy of the incoming electron being key parameters , the study of the process of mott scattering in the presence of an elliptically polarized laser field introduces a new key parameter , namely the degree of ellipticity @xmath0 . the cross section dependency on this new key parameter
is reported .
the general features of the mott scattering process are qualitatively modified when a laser field is present and this is particularly true when one study the spin - dependent relativistic mott scattering .
not only it is important to take care of the fact that the electron is a fermion but also to describe this particle by the appropriate wave function in a non - perturbative way .
this is done by using the dirac - volkov wave functions @xcite which contain the interaction of the electron with the laser field to all orders .
the organization of this paper is as follows . in section
ii , we present the theory in the first born approximation . in section iii , we discuss the analytical results for the spin - unpolarized differential cross section modified by the laser field and analyze their dependencies on the new relevant parameter , that is the degree of ellipticity @xmath0 .
we end by a brief summary and conclusion in section iv . throughout this work ,
we use atomic units @xmath1 and work with the metric tensor @xmath2 .
we treat the laser field classically since we are considering intensities that do not allow pair creation @xcite .
the four potential corresponding to the laser field satisfies the lorentz condition @xmath3 and is given by @xmath4 with @xmath5 and where @xmath6 is the degree of ellipticity of the laser field .
the four vectors @xmath7 and @xmath8 satisfy the following relations @xmath9 @xmath10 and the lorentz condition @xmath11 implies @xmath12 .
the linear polarization is obtained for @xmath13 and the circular polarization is obtained for @xmath14 . the electric field associated with the potential of the laser field
is @xmath15 the interaction potential is the coulomb potential of a target nucleus of charge @xmath16
@xmath17 and in the first born approximation , the transition matrix element for the transition ( @xmath18 ) is @xmath19 the dirac - volkov wave functions @xmath20 and @xmath21 describe the incident and scattered electron respectively .
such wave functions normalized to the volume @xmath22 are @xcite @xmath23 where @xmath24 represents a dirac bispinor normalized as @xmath25 and @xmath26 is the quasi - impulsion acquired by the electron in the presence of the laser field @xmath27 the quantity @xmath28 is defined by @xmath29 , and @xmath30 , where the feynmann slash notation is used @xcite : for a given four vector @xmath31 , we have @xmath32 .
finally the averaged squared potential @xmath33 is given by @xmath34 from which one deduces @xmath35 for the case of a circular polarization of the laser field and @xmath36 for the case of a linear polarization of the laser field .
the argument @xmath37 of the ordinary bessel functions is @xmath38 with @xmath39 and @xmath40\tan ( \eta /2 ) .
\label{10}\ ] ] a useful parameter that intervenes in the expression of the dcs is @xmath41 . using the standard procedures of qed @xcite
, we obtain for the spin - unpolarized differential cross section evaluated for @xmath42 @xmath43 with @xmath44 using reduce for the trace calculations @xcite , we obtain @xmath45 the eight coefficients @xmath31 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 , @xmath49 , @xmath50 , @xmath51 and @xmath52 are given respectively by @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 where @xmath61 . in the absence of the laser field , all the contributions coming from the sum over @xmath62 of the various ordinary bessel functions vanish except for @xmath63 where @xmath64 and we recover the well known formula for mott scattering in the absence of the laser field @xcite @xmath65 where @xmath66 . it can easily be checked that for the case of a linear polarization of the laser field ( @xmath13 ) , the phase @xmath67 and the results of s.m .
et al _ @xcite are straightforward to obtain whereas for the circular polarization ( @xmath14 ) , we find the results previously found by y. attaourti _ et al _ @xcite .
( [ 11 ] ) is the relativistic generalization of the bunkin and fedorov @xcite treatment and it contains the degree of ellipticity of the laser field as a new key parameter .
in this section , we discuss the numerical simulations for the differential cross sections of the mott scattering by an elliptically polarized laser field .
we assume without loss of generality that the target is a proton having a charge @xmath68 .
the @xmath37 axis is set along the direction of the field wave vector @xmath69 , @xmath70 and @xmath71 with the vectors @xmath72 and @xmath73 such that @xmath74 and @xmath75 from which one deduces that @xmath76 .
thus , as found by s.m .
li @xcite for the linear polarization , we have @xmath77 and for the case of circular polarization @xcite , @xmath78 . the laser frequency used is @xmath79 @xmath80 which corresponds to a photon energy @xmath81 @xmath82 .
the incident electron kinetic energy is @xmath83 @xmath84 which corresponds to a relativistic parameter @xmath85 and the electric field strength has the value @xmath86
@xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 .
the various differential cross sections are plotted as functions of the angle @xmath90 . for small scattering angles ,
typically ( @xmath91 ) , ( @xmath92 ) , the summed spin - unpolarized differential cross sections are sharply peaked around @xmath93 and are all close to the corresponding unpolarized laser - free differential cross section given in eq .
( [ 22 ] ) .
@xmath84 as a function of the angle @xmath90 scaled in @xmath94 .
the electric field strength is @xmath86 @xmath80 and the laser frequency is @xmath79 @xmath80 . the corresponding mott - scattering geometry is given in the text.,width=4,height=4 ] the three dcss corresponding to @xmath13 , @xmath95 and @xmath14 are given in fig .
1 together with the laser - free dcs for the geometry ( @xmath96 ) , ( @xmath97 ) . we obtain four almost indistinguishable curves .
thus , at small angles , the summed differential cross sections are almost unmodified by the laser field and its polarization does not play a key role .
the physical explanation of this observation is that classically , when the particles are close to the small angle scattering region , this corresponds to large impact parameters and the incident electron does not deviate notably from its trajectory . for other scattering angles , ( @xmath98 ) , ( @xmath99 ) ,
the situation changes drastically since for medium and large scattering angles , the momentum transfer during the mott scattering is large and a significant number of photons can be exchanged with the laser field . in fig .
2 , we compare the three dcss corresponding to @xmath100 , @xmath95 and @xmath14 together with the laser - free dcs for the geometry ( @xmath101 ) , ( @xmath102 ) for an exchange of @xmath103 photons . in this geometry , the effect of the laser field polarization is clearly shown since the three dcss are now well distinguishable .
one has to sum over a very large number of photons to recover the laser - free dcs .
furthermore , all numerical simulations have shown the following .
the dcs for linear polarization is always higher than the two others .
the dcs for elliptical polarization is lower or higher than the dcs for circular polarization depending on the value of the degree of ellipticity @xmath0 .
photons scaled in @xmath104 .
as in fig . 1 , @xmath86 @xmath80 and @xmath79 @xmath80
. the corresponding mott - scattering geometry is explained in the text.,width=5,height=3 ] to have an idea about the behaviour of the dcs as a function of the degree of ellipticity @xmath0 , we have obtained a three dimensional curve corresponding to the same geometry as in fig . 2 but for a degree of ellipticity @xmath0 varying from @xmath105 to @xmath106 .
there are oscillations of the dcs for the elliptical polarization and the dcs for linear polarization is always the higher dcs .
these oscillations decrease as the number of photons exchanged is increased . the convergence towards the laser - free dcs is faster for the linear polarization of the laser field . for the circular polarization
, this convergence is easily obtained when one finds the value for the convergence corresponding to the linear polarization whereas it is much more difficult to infer from the previous results for which value of the number of photons exchanged , the dcs for the elliptical polarization will converge to the laser - free dcs .
however , depending on the value of @xmath0 and in the non relativistic regime we have chosen , this number is @xmath107 photons . when the incident electron relativistic parameter is increased from @xmath108 to @xmath109 , the previous mentioned results remain valid but the corresponding dcss are very small indicating a small probability that the very fast projectile electron will exchange photons with the radiation field . as for the behaviour of the dcss with respect to the degree of ellipticity ,
the ellipically and circularly polarized laser modified cross sections become more sharply peaked around the angle @xmath110 .
a similar result has been reported [ 3 ] .
in this work , we have extended the study of the mott scattering process of an electron by a charged nucleus to the case of a general polarization .
we have shown that the mott - scattering geometry as well as the key parameters such as the electric field strength and the incident electron kinetic energy influence the behaviour of the dcss . moreover ,
the degree of ellipticity @xmath0 is also a key parameter for the description of the mott scattering process particularly in the region of large momentum transfer and for a number of photons exchanged lower than that for which the dcss tend to the laser - free one .
li , j. berakdar , j. chen , z .- f .
zhou , phys .
a , * 67 * , 063409 , ( 2003 ) .
y. attaourti , b. manaut , phys .
a , * 68 * , 067401 , ( 2003 ) . c. szymanowski , v. vniard , r. taeb , a. maquet , and c.h .
keitel , phys .
rev . a , * 56 * , 3846 , ( 1997 ) .
v. berestetzkii , e. m. lifshitz and l. p. pitaevskii , _ quantum electrodynamics , 2nd ed . _
( pergamon press , oxford , 1982 ) .
w. greiner and j. reinhardt , _ quantum electrodynamics _ , ( springer - verlag , berlin - heidelberg , 1992 ) .
a. g. grozin , _ using reduce in high energy physics _ ( cambridge university press , 1997 ) .
f. v. bunkin and m.v .
fedorov , zh eksp .
teor . fiz . *
49 * , 1215 , ( 1965)[sov .
jetp * 22 * , 844 ( 1966 ) ] .
|
note analytical results mott scattering strong laser field compare results to previous works s.m . et al _ @xcite y. attaourti _ @xcite hope contribution useful to researchers end controversy expression c. szymanowski _ @xcite circular polarization laser field analytical expression spin - unpolarized differential cross section derived using trace calculations electric field strength frequency laser field kinetic energy incoming electron key parameters study mott scattering elliptically polarized laser field introduces new key parameter degree of ellipticity cross section dependency on new key parameter reported features mott scattering modified when laser field present particularly spin - dependent relativistic mott scattering important electron fermion describe particle by appropriate wave function non - perturbative dirac - volkov wave functions interaction electron with laser field organization paper section ii present theory first born approximation discuss analytical results for spin - unpolarized differential cross section modified by laser field analyze dependencies on new parameter degree of ellipticity @xmath0 end summary conclusion in section iv use atomic units @xmath1 work with metric tensor @xmath2treat laser field classically considering intensities pair creation four potential satisfies lorentz condition given by @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 ellipticity laser field four vectors @xmath7 satisfy relations @xmath9 lorentz condition implies @xmath12 linear polarization @xmath13 circular polarization @xmath14 electric field associated with potential laser @xmath15 interaction potential coulomb potential target nucleus @xmath16 transition matrix element is @xmath19 dirac - volkov wave functions @xmath20 @xmath21 describe incident scattered electron wave functions normalized to volume @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 dirac bispinor quasi - impulsion electron laser field quantity @xmath28 defined by @xmath29 @xmath30 feynmann slash notation used four vector @xmath31 @xmath32 averaged squared potential @xmath33 given by @xmath34 deduces @xmath35 circular polarization @xmath36 linear polarization argument @xmath37 ordinary bessel functions is @xmath38 with @xmath39 @xmath40useful parameter expression dcs is @xmath41 standard procedures qed @xcite obtain spin - unpolarized differential cross section for @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 obtain @xmath45 eight coefficients @xmath31 given by @xmath53 @xmath61 absence laser field contributions from sum @xmath62 ordinary bessel functions vanish except @xmath63 @xmath64 recover formula for mott scattering absence laser field @xmath65 @xmath66 linear polarization laser field ( @xmath13 ) phase @xmath67 results of s.m . et al _ @xcite straightforward obtain circular polarization ( @xmath14 ) results found by y. attaourti _ et al _ @xcite relativistic generalization of bunkin and fedorov @xcite treatment degree ellipticity laser field new key parameter discuss numerical simulations for differential cross sections mott scattering by elliptically polarized laser field assume target is proton charge @xmath68@xmath37 axis set field wave vector @xmath69 vectors @xmath72 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 linear polarization @xmath77 circular polarization @xmath78 laser frequency @xmath79 @xmath80 photon energy @xmath81 incident electron kinetic energy @xmath83 @xmath84 relativistic parameter @xmath85 electric field strength @xmath86 @xmath89 differential cross sections functions angle @xmath90 small scattering angles @xmath91 @xmath92 spin - unpolarized differential cross sections peaked around @xmath93 close to unpolarized laser - free differential cross section eq . 22 @xmath84 function angle @xmath90 @xmath94 electric field strength @xmath86 @xmath80 laser frequency @xmath79 @xmath80 mott - scattering geometry in text three dcss @xmath13 @xmath95 @xmath14 in fig . 1 laser - free dcs geometry @xmath96 @xmath97 ) four indistinguishable curves small angles differential cross sections unmodified by laser field polarization keyphysical explanation particles close to small angle scattering region corresponds to large impact parameters incident electron deviate from trajectory other scattering angles @xmath98 @xmath99 ) situation changes medium large momentum transfer large significant photons exchanged with laser field . 2 three dcss @xmath100 @xmath95 @xmath14 with laser - free dcs for @xmath101 @xmath102 ) exchange @xmath103 photons effect of laser field polarization shown three dcss distinguishable sum over large number of photons to recover laser - free dcs numerical simulations dcs for linear polarization higher elliptical polarization lower or higher than circular depending on degree of ellipticity @xmath0 photons scaled in @xmath104 fig . 1 @xmath86 @xmath80 @xmath79 mott - scattering geometry explained in text behaviour dcs degree of ellipticity @xmath0 obtained three dimensional curve same geometry 2 degree ellipticity varying from @xmath105 to @xmath106 oscillations of dcs for elliptical polarization for linear polarization higheroscillations decrease photons exchanged convergence towards laser - free dcs faster for linear polarization circular polarization convergence obtained when value to linear polarization difficult to infer dcs elliptical polarization converge to laser - free dcs depending on value @xmath0 non relativistic regime number is @xmath107 photons incident electron relativistic parameter increased from @xmath108 to @xmath109 results remain valid dcss small small probability fast projectile electron exchange photons with radiation field ellipticity ellipically circularly polarized laser modified cross sections peaked around angle @xmath110 similar result reported extended study of mott scattering process electron by charged nucleus to general polarization mott - scattering geometry electric field strength incident electron kinetic energy influence behaviour dcss degree of ellipticity @xmath0 key for mott scattering process particularly large momentum transfer photons exchanged lower dcss tend to laser - free one . li , j. berakdar j. chen z f zhou phys . 67 063409 2003 ) y. attaourti b.manaut phys . 68 * 067401 2003 ) szymanowski vniard taeb maquet keitel . rev. 56 * 3846 1997 ) berestetzkii lifshitz pitaevskii quantum electrodynamics 2nd ed pergamon press oxford 1982 greiner j reinhardt quantum electrodynamics springer - verlag berlin heidelberg 1992 grozin high energy physics cambridge university press 1997 bunkin fedorov teor . fiz . 49 * , 1215 1965 jetp 22 * ( 1966 )
| 0.431617
| 2,820
| 1,426
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,697
|
we present results of our spectroscopic observations of nine detached eclipsing binaries ( debs ) , selected from the _ kepler _ eclipsing binary catalog , that only show one set of spectral lines .
radial velocities ( rvs ) were calculated from the high resolution spectra obtained with the hides instrument , attached to the 1.88-m telescope at the okayama astrophysical observatory , and from the public apogee archive .
in our sample we found five single - lined binaries , with one component dominating the spectrum .
the orbital and light curve solutions were found for four of them , and compared with isochrones , in order to estimate absolute physical parameters and evolutionary status of the components .
for the fifth case we only update the orbital parameters , and estimate the properties of the unseen star .
two other systems show orbital motion with a period known from the eclipse timing variations ( etvs ) . for these we obtained parameters of outer orbits , by translating the etvs to rvs of the centre of mass of the eclipsing binary , and combining with the rvs of the outer star .
of the two remaining ones , one is most likely a blend of a faint background deb with a bright foreground star , which lines we see in the spectra , and the last case is possibly a quadruple bearing a sub - stellar mass object . where possible , we compare our results with literature , especially with results from asteroseismology .
we also report possible detections of solar - like oscillations in our rvs .
[ firstpage ] binaries : spectroscopic binaries : eclipsing stars : evolution stars : fundamental parameters stars : late - type stars : individual : kic 03120320 , kic 04758368 , kic 05598639 , kic 08430105 , kic 08718273 , kic 10001167 , kic 10015516 , kic 10614012 , kic 10991989
|
the launch of space photometric missions , such as corot , most , or _ kepler _ , has revolutionized many branches of stellar astrophysics . extremely precise and nearly continuous photometric observations led to many discoveries and improvements in studies of various kinds of variable stars .
one of the fields that benefited the most are detached eclipsing binaries ( debs ) .
these are one of the most important objects for the astrophysics , as they allow to directly determine a number of fundamental stellar parameters , that are difficult or sometimes impossible to obtain otherwise .
the unprecedented photometric quality of _ kepler _ data has opened new possibilities in studies of debs , as it allows for better than before precision in derivation of light - curve - based parameters , like fractional radii or orbital inclination , and observations of various other phenomena , for example : differential rotation , activity cycles , pulsations , including tidally induced , solar - like oscillations , etc .
the _ kepler _ mission has revealed a zoo of objects , showing variety of characteristics .
the photometry alone , however , is not enough to accurately characterize a given deb .
one has to combine it with information obtained from spectra , optimally taken with high resolution .
this information includes for example : precise radial velocities ( rvs ) , monitored in time in order to observe their variability , or atmospheric parameters obtained from spectral analysis .
only such a complete set of data is useful for the purposes of modern stellar astrophysics .
studies of debs are important not only because of the information one can obtain for a particular object .
characterisation of a large number of targets is beneficial for statistical studies , from which one can draw conclusions about , e.g. , the amount of binaries and higher - order multiples , or mechanisms of their formation and evolution . for this reason , we have started a spectroscopic monitoring of the brightest _ kepler _ debs with the 1.88-m telescope of the okayama astrophysical observatory . for the purpose of precise characterization of stellar components , one should target those debs that are also double - lined spectroscopic binaries ( sb2s ) .
however , it is also possible derive many important information from single - lined ( sb1 ) objects . in this study
we present a sample of such systems , showing the variety they represent from primary components of exotic binaries , to multiples of different orders .
this work is organized as follows . in section [ sec_targets ]
we briefly present the target selection criteria for our whole program , and basic information about the systems presented here .
section [ sec_data ] presents the data used for this study .
section [ sec_analysis ] presents all the methods used for this work , including spectra reduction , derivation of rvs and eclipse timing measurements , modelling rv and light curves , and comparison with isochrones .
the results , are presented in section [ sec_results ] , and the last section contains a short summary .
[ cols="<,<,<,<,<,<,^,<,<",options="header " , ]
|
launch of space photometric missions corot most _ kepler _ revolutionized stellar astrophysics precise continuous photometric observations led to discoveries improvements in studies variable stars benefited detached eclipsing binaries ( debs ) important objects for astrophysics fundamental stellar parameters difficult obtain unprecedented photometric quality of _ kepler _ data opened new possibilities in studies debs precision in derivation of light - curve - based parameters fractional orbital inclination observations of other phenomena differential rotation activity cycles pulsations solar - like oscillations _ kepler _ mission revealed zoo of objects showing variety characteristics photometry alone not enough to characterize deb with information from spectra high resolution information includes precise radial velocities ( atmospheric parameters complete set of data useful for modern stellar astrophysics studies of debs important information characterisation of large number of targets beneficial for statistical studies conclusions about binaries higher - order multiples mechanisms formation evolution started spectroscopic monitoring of brightest _ kepler _ debs with 1.88-m telescope of okayama astrophysical observatoryprecise characterization stellar components target double - lined spectroscopic binaries ( sb2s ) possible derive information from single - lined ( sb1 ) objects study present sample systems variety from primary components exotic binaries to multiples different orders work organized section sec_targets ] target selection criteria basic information about systems sec_data ] presents data sec_analysis ] presents methods including spectra reduction derivation of rvs eclipse timing measurements modelling rv light curves comparison with isochrones results presented in section sec_results ] last section short summary cols="<",options="header "
| 0.13314
| 622
| 300
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,700
|
we present the discovery of two new dwarf galaxies , andromeda xxi and andromeda xxii , located in the surroundings of the andromeda and triangulum galaxies ( m31 and m33 ) .
these discoveries stem from the first year data of the pan - andromeda archaeological survey ( pandas ) , a photometric survey of the m31/m33 group conducted with the megaprime / megacam wide - field camera mounted on the canada - france - hawaii telescope .
both satellites appear as spatial overdensities of stars which , when plotted in a color - magnitude diagram , follow metal - poor , @xmath0 , red giant branches at the distance of m31/m33 . andromeda xxi is a moderately bright dwarf galaxy ( @xmath1 ) , albeit with low surface brightness , emphasizing again that many relatively luminous m31 satellites still remain to be discovered .
it is also a large satellite , with a half - light radius close to @xmath2 , making it the fourth largest local group dwarf spheroidal galaxy after the recently discovered andromeda xix , andromeda ii and sagittarius around the milky way , and supports the trend that m31 satellites are larger than their milky way counterparts .
andromeda xxii is much fainter ( @xmath3 ) and lies a lot closer in projection to m33 than it does to m31 ( 42 vs. 224 ) , suggesting that it could be the first triangulum satellite to be discovered .
although this is a very exciting possibility in the context of a past interaction of m33 with m31 and the fate of its satellite system , a confirmation will have to await a good distance estimate to confirm its physical proximity to m33 .
along with the dwarf galaxies found in previous surveys of the m31 surroundings , these two new satellites bring the number of dwarf spheroidal galaxies in this region to 20 .
|
systematic deep photometric observations of the surroundings of the andromeda galaxy have revolutionized our knowledge of its satellite system . before 2004 , 12 dwarf galaxies were known to be m31 companions , including only 6 dwarf spheroidal galaxies , while 12 new dwarf galaxies have been discovered to inhabit this region of the local group sky over the last five years . a dedicated scan of the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) , targeting a region within @xmath4 of m31 s major axis , unveiled the presence of andromeda ix and x @xcite . in parallel , a contiguous mapping of the region within @xmath5 of andromeda , performed with the wide field camera on the isaac newton telescope , revealed the picture of a strikingly substructured inner stellar halo @xcite , and led to the discovery of andromeda xvii @xcite . mapping the outer regions of m31 s
halo was the goal of an extension to this survey .
performed with the megaprime / megacam @xmath6 camera on the canada - france - hawaii telescope ( cfht ) , it mapped a quarter of the m31 stellar halo , out to @xmath7 @xcite . confirming the clumpy nature of andromeda s stellar halo , the survey has also revealed the presence of numerous other dwarf galaxies : andromeda xi , xii , xiii , xv , xvi , xviii , xix and xx @xcite . at about the same time
, andromeda xiv was discovered serendipitously by @xcite , just outside of the edge of the megacam survey .
our understanding of these systems remains sparse , mainly due to the distance at which they reside , translating into difficult photometric observations that can not easily reach much deeper than the horizontal branch at the distance of m31 .
spectroscopic observations are also limited to the handful of bright red giant branch ( rgb ) stars that can be targeted in each system .
although progress is expected along these lines in the coming years , much can already be said of the generic properties of these new objects from the current survey data alone .
their absolute magnitude ranges from a very faint @xmath8 for and xii and and xx @xcite to a surprisingly bright @xmath9 for and xviii @xcite , patently showing the incompleteness of the m31 satellite luminosity function at the faint end , in regions that have so far only been surveyed with photographic plates .
given their relative faintness and significant sizes , these new systems are usually assumed to be dwarf spheroidal galaxies , in other words dwarf galaxies that are devoid of any significant amount of gas .
this is currently consistent with the analysis of hi surveys but the upper limits on their hi content remains relatively high ( @xmath10 ; @xcite ) .
therefore , it can not be entirely ruled out that some of these galaxies still contain non - negligeable amounts of gas .
building upon the previous megacam survey , we have initiated the pan - andromeda archaeological survey ( pandas ) , a large program using the cfht megacam imager to map the entire stellar halo of m31 and m33 out to distances of @xmath11 and @xmath5 respectively . here
, we report on the discovery of two new dwarf galaxies in the vicinity of the andromeda and triangulum galaxies based on the first year of pandas data .
these systems , dubbed andromeda xxi and xxii are sparse but unmistakable overdensities of stars that are also aligned along a rgb at the distance of m31 .
section 2 of this paper briefly summarizes the pandas data while section 3 presents the new systems and details their properties .
section 4 briefly discusses the new discoveries and section 5 concludes the paper . throughout this paper , the distance moduli of m31 and m33
are assumed to be @xmath12 and @xmath13 , or @xmath14 and @xmath15 respectively @xcite .
pandas builds upon our previous cfht / megacam surveys of m31 whose results are presented in @xcite , @xcite and @xcite .
we use a similar observational set - up and refer the reader to these papers for a description of the observing strategy , data reduction and data quality .
maps showing early results and the complete survey area to date can be found in @xcite and led to the discovery of and xxi and and xxii .
the survey consists of contiguous exposures , performed with the @xmath16 deg@xmath17 megaprime / megacam camera mounted on the cfht .
the camera is a mosaic of 36 @xmath18 ccds with a pixel size of 0.187arsec .
small gaps within the survey lead to a scientifically useable field - of - view of @xmath19 for each of the current 250pointings of the survey .
each field has been observed for 1350s in each of the megacam @xmath20 and @xmath21 filters , split into @xmath22s dithered subexposures .
good seeing ( @xmath23 ) ensures that the photometry reaches @xmath24 and @xmath25 with a signal - to - noise ratio of 10 and guarantees that the star / galaxy separation only degrades at magnitudes fainter than @xmath26 and @xmath27 .
data were preprocessed ( de - biased , flat - fielded and fringe corrected ) by the elixir system at cfht that also determines the photometric zero point of the observations , and then processed using a version of the cambridge astronomical survey unit ( casu ) photometry pipeline @xcite , adapted to cfht / megacam observations .
the pipeline registers and stacks the images , and also generates catalogues with object morphological classification before creating band - merged @xmath20 , @xmath21 products . in the following ,
dereddened magnitudes ( @xmath28 and @xmath29 ) have been determined from the @xcite @xmath30 extinction maps , using the following correction coefficients : @xmath31 and @xmath32 , listed in their table 6 .
two new dwarf galaxies were directly identified on matched - filter surface density maps of rgb candidate stars selected to have colors consistent with the average ( generally ) metal - poor locus of m31 dwarf spheroidals .
satellites in the very sparsely populated outer halo regions correspond to stellar overdensities that are striking enough for them to be easily spotted , even down to magnitudes of @xmath33 .
this was the case for and xii @xcite and and xx @xcite and also here with andromeda xxii .
an automated search is certainly warranted to better quantify the detection limits of the survey in uncovering new dwarf galaxies .
however , it is beyond the scope of this initial discovery paper and will be presented elsewhere .
map of dwarf galaxies located in the surroundings of m31 and m33 .
m31 is located at the center of the coordinate system and known satellites are represented by empty circles .
the two new discoveries , and xxi and and xxii , are represented by filled circles . the current extent of the pandas survey
is shown as dotted squares , with each square representing a single @xmath34 megacam field .
the ellipse represents the extent of m31 s hi disk .
constellation boundaries , taken from @xcite , are shown as thin lines . ]
the locations of the two new satellites are shown on the map of the pandas survey ( figure [ map ] ) . as with many previous detections ,
these two systems are noticeably close to the edge of the survey , suggesting that the survey limit of @xmath35 in projected distance from m31 does not represent the true extent of andromeda s satellite system ( see also figure 2 of @xcite ) . in the spirit of previous conventions ,
we dub these two satellites andromeda xxi and andromeda xxii ( and xxi and and xxii ; see the discussion below , in appendix [ naming_conventions ] ) .
both systems appear as overdensities of stars on the sky , as is visible in the left panels of figures [ map_andxxi ] and [ map_andxxii ] .
these stars are also aligned along a rgb that would be at , or close to , the distance of m31 or m33 .
the cmds within 2 half - light radii of the dwarfs ( determined in [ strparam ] below ) are shown in the middle panels of these figures and , when compared to the cmd of reference fields chosen in an annulus covering the same area at a distance of @xmath36 from the dwarfs centers ( right panels ) , indeed reveal an alignment of stars that follow the typical shape of a rgb . isolating these stars enhances the contrast of the overdensity of stars on the sky ( large symbols in the left panels ) . and
xxi is typical of the relatively bright dwarf galaxies that we have found before ( such as and xv or and xvi ) .
the overdensity of stars in the cmd region @xmath37 and @xmath38 corresponds to its horizontal branch but the degrading star / galaxy separation at these magnitudes , as well as the rapidly dropping completeness , makes it difficult to extract any accurate information from this region of the cmd . with only @xmath39stars visible along its rgb , and
xxii is one of the faintest m31 satellites found so far . , e. , dunkley , j. , nolta , m. r. , bennett , c. l. , gold , b. , hinshaw , g. , jarosik , n. , larson , d. , limon , m. , page , l. , spergel , d. n. , halpern , m. , hill , r. s. , kogut , a. , meyer , s. s. , tucker , g. s. , weiland , j. l. , wollack , e. , & wright , e. l. 2009 , , 180 , 330 , a. w. , irwin , m. j. , ibata , r. a. , dubinski , j. , widrow , l. m. , ct , p. , dotter , a. , navarro , j. f. , ferguson , a. m. n. , h. , p. t. , lewis , g. f. , babul , a. , barmby , p. , bienaym , o. , chapman , s. c. , cockcroft , r. , collins , m. l. m. , fardal , m. a. , harris , w. e. , huxor , a. , mackey , a. d. , pearrubia , j. , rich , r. m. , richer , h. , siebert , a. , tanvir , n. r. , valls - gabaud , d. , & venn , k. a. 2009 , , in press , h. r. , merrifield , m. r. , douglas , n. g. , kuijken , k. , romanowsky , a. j. , napolitano , n. r. , arnaboldi , m. , capaccioli , m. , freeman , k. c. , gerhard , o. , coccato , l. , carter , d. , evans , n. w. , wilkinson , m. i. , halliday , c. , & bridges , t. j. 2006 , , 369 , 120 , d. b. , kniazev , a. y. , bell , e. f. , martnez - delgado , d. , grebel , e. k. , rix , h .- w . , rockosi , c. m. , holtzman , j. a. , walterbos , r. a. m. , annis , j. , york , d. g. , ivezi , .
, brinkmann , j. , brewington , h. , harvanek , m. , hennessy , g. , kleinman , s. j. , krzesinski , j. , long , d. , newman , p. r. , nitta , a. , & snedden , s. a. 2004 , , 612 , l121 , d. b. , kniazev , a. y. , martnez - delgado , d. , bell , e. f. , rix , h .- w . , grebel , e. k. , holtzman , j. a. , walterbos , r. a. m. , rockosi , c. m. , york , d. g. , barentine , j. c. , brewington , h. , brinkmann , j. , harvanek , m. , kleinman , s. j. , krzesinski , j. , long , d. , neilsen , jr .
, e. h. , nitta , a. , & snedden , s. a. 2007 , , 659 , l21
|
photometric observations andromeda galaxy revolutionized knowledge satellite system before 2004 12 dwarf galaxies known m31 companions 6 spheroidal galaxies 12 new galaxies discovered last five years scan sloan digital sky survey region within @xmath4 m31 s axis unveiled andromeda ix and x @xcite mapping region @xmath5 andromeda wide isaac newton telescope revealed substructured inner stellar halo @xcite led discovery andromeda xvii @xcite mapping outer regions m31 s halo goal extension survey megaprime / megacam @xmath6 camera telescope mapped quarter of m31 stellar halo to @xmath7 @xcite confirming clumpy nature andromeda s stellar halo survey revealed other dwarf galaxies andromeda xi xii xiii xv xvi xviii xix xx @xcite andromeda xiv discovered by @xcite outside edge megacam survey understanding systems remains sparse due to distance difficult photometric observations deeper than m31 spectroscopic observations limited to handful bright red giant branch rgb ) starsprogress expected years generic properties new objects from current survey data magnitude ranges from faint @xmath8 to bright @xmath9 xviii showing incompleteness m31 satellite luminosity function faint end in regions surveyed with photographic plates faintness significant sizes new systems assumed be dwarf spheroidal galaxies devoid of significant gas consistent with analysis hi surveys upper limits hi content high ( @xmath10 ; @xcite ) not some galaxies contain gas initiated pan - andromeda archaeological survey program stellar halo of m31 and m33 to distances @xmath11 and @xmath5 report on discovery of two new dwarf galaxies vicinity andromeda triangulum galaxies pandas data systems andromeda xxi and xxii are sparse overdensities of stars aligned along rgb at distance of m31 section 2 summarizes pandas data section 3 presents new systems details properties section 4 discusses new discoveries section 5 concludes paper distance moduli of m31 and m33 assumed to be @xmath12 and @xmath13 or @xmath14 and @xmath15 @xcitepandas builds previous cfht megacam surveys m31 results presented in @xcite similar observational set - up refer observing strategy data reduction quality maps results complete survey area in @xcite discovery xxi xxii survey contiguous exposures @xmath16@xmath17 megacam camera cfht 36 @xmath18 ccds pixel size 0.187arsec small gaps lead field - of - view @xmath19 250pointings field observed for 1350s in megacam @xmath20 @xmath21 filters split @xmath22s subexposures good seeing @xmath23 ensures photometry reaches @xmath24 @xmath25 signal - to - noise ratio 10 star / galaxy separation degrades magnitudes fainter than @xmath26 @xmath27 data preprocessed de - biased flat - fielded fringe corrected by elixir system cfht photometric zero processed cambridge astronomical photometry pipeline @xcite registers stacks images generates catalogues object morphological classification band - merged @xmath20 @xmath21 productsdereddened magnitudes @xmath28 @xmath29 determined from @xcite @xmath30 extinction maps using correction coefficients : @xmath31 @xmath32 table 6 two new dwarf galaxies identified on matched - filter surface density maps of rgb stars consistent with metal - poor locus of m31 dwarf spheroidals satellites in sparsely populated outer halo regions to stellar overdensities spotted magnitudes @xmath33 for xii @xcite xx andromeda xxii automated search warranted detection limits new dwarf galaxies beyond presented map of dwarf galaxies m31 m33 m31 center coordinate system satellites by empty circles two new discoveries xxi xxii by filled circles current extent of pandas survey shown as dotted squares single @xmath34 megacam field ellipse represents extent of m31 s hi disk constellation boundaries as thin lines locations of two new satellites on map pandas survey two systems close to edge of survey survey limit of @xmath35 from m31 represent true extent of andromeda s satellite system figure 2previous conventions dub satellites andromeda xxi and xxii see discussion appendix [ naming_conventions ] both systems appear as overdensities of stars sky visible in left panels of figures [ map_andxxi and map_andxxii stars aligned along rgb at close distance m31 or m33 cmds within 2 half - light radii of dwarfs determined in [ strparam ] shown in middle panels of figures compared to reference fields annulus same area at distance @xmath36 from dwarfs centers reveal alignment of stars typical shape rgb isolating stars enhances contrast overdensity stars large symbols in left panels xxi typical of bright dwarf galaxies xv xvi overdensity of stars in cmd region @xmath37 and @xmath38 corresponds to horizontal branch degrading star / galaxy separation magnitudes rapidly dropping completeness makes difficult to extract accurate information only @xmath39stars visible along rgb and xxii faintest m31 satellites found dunkley nolta bennett gold hinshaw jarosik larson limon page spergel halpern hills. kogut meyer tucker weiland j wollack wright .. 2009 ,, 180 , 330 irwin ibata dubinski j widrow l ct p dotter navarro j. ferguson h p. lewis . babul barmby p bienaym chapman s cockcroft collins fardal harris huxor mackey pearrubia j rich richer h siebert tanvir n. valls - gabaud d venn , k.. 2009 , press h. merrifield . douglas n kuijken romanowsky . napolitano n. arnaboldi capaccioli freeman gerhard coccato l carter d evans wilkinson halliday c. bridges t. j. 2006 , 369 , 120 , d. b.kniazev a y bell e f martnez - delgado grebel rix rockosi holtzman j walterbos annis j york d. g ivezi brinkmann j brewington h harvanek m hennessy g kleinman s. j krzesinski long d newman p. r nitta a snedden s. a. 2004 , 612 , l121 kniazev martnez - delgado bell rix grebel holtzman j walterbos rockosi c york d. barentine j h brinkmann j harvanek m kleinman s. j krzesinski j long , d. neilsen jr h. nitta a. snedden s. a. 2007 659 , l21
| 0.44243
| 2,925
| 1,469
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,710
|
we determine all the multiplicity - free representations of the symmetric group .
this project is motivated by a combinatorial problem involving systems of set - partitions with a specific pattern of intersection .
|
in this paper we aim to determine the multiplicity - free permutation representations of the symmetric groups .
this question of which subgroups of the symmetric group have a multiplicity - free permutation representation arose from the combinatorial problem of determining the largest collection of set - partitions with a specific type of intersection .
we will start by describing the combinatorial problem and stating our results and then explain how it is related to the multiplicity - free representations of the symmetric group .
all the calculations performed in this paper are done using the computational discrete algebra system gap @xcite .
let @xmath0 be integers with @xmath1 .
a _ uniform @xmath2-partition of an @xmath3-set _ is a set - partition of the @xmath3-set into @xmath2 classes each of cardinality @xmath4 .
we say two such partitions @xmath5 and @xmath6 are _ qualitatively independent _ if each cell of @xmath5 and each cell of @xmath6 have at least one element in common . for practical reasons ,
we want large sets of pairwise qualitatively independent partitions @xcite . the _ qualitative independence graph _ @xmath7 is the graph whose vertices are the uniform @xmath2-partitions , where two partitions are adjacent if they are qualitatively independent . in this
setting , our problem is to find the cliques of maximum size in @xmath7 .
for @xmath8 the problem is trivial since the graph @xmath9 is a clique .
for @xmath2 a prime power , the size of the maximum clique of @xmath10 is known to be @xmath11 ( @xcite , section 5.4 ) .
very few bounds on the clique size of @xmath7 are known for other values of @xmath3 and @xmath2 .
one approach is to make use use of a family of graphs that generalises the graphs @xmath7 . if @xmath5 and @xmath6 are two uniform @xmath2-partitions , their _ meet table _ is the @xmath12 array with the @xmath13 entry @xmath14 .
two meet tables are _ isomorphic _ if we can obtain one from the other by permuting its rows and columns .
different orderings on the classes in the partitions @xmath5 and @xmath6 could produce different , but isomorphic meet tables . note that @xmath5 and @xmath6 are qualitatively independent if and only if all entries of their meet table are positive . for each possible meet table
@xmath15 , we define a graph whose vertices are the uniform partitions , where two partitions are adjacent if their meet table is isomorphic to @xmath15 . for example , if @xmath16 and all entries in @xmath15 are equal to one , then the corresponding graph is @xmath10 .
thus we have a family of graphs , one for each meet table , whose edges partition the edges of the complete graph on the uniform partitions .
if the adjacency matrices of these graphs commute , then standard eigenvalue methods can be used to obtain bounds on the maximum sizes of cliques .
mathon and rosa @xcite show that for @xmath17 and @xmath18 that the family of adjacency matrices of these graphs is commutative .
this result is used by godsil and newman to prove that the graph @xmath19 is a core @xcite .
it is conjectured in @xcite that the graph @xmath10 is a core for all values of @xmath2 .
a first step towards this is to determine if the adjacency matrices of these graphs for @xmath16 commute for all values of @xmath2 .
how can we decide if these matrices commute ?
the key fact is that the symmetric group @xmath20 acts as a group of permutations on the set of uniform partitions , and the matrices we have just defined commute with each other if and only if this permutation representation is _ multiplicity free _ , that is , each irreducible representation of @xmath20 occurs in it with multiplicity 0 or 1 .
( see @xcite , section 29 . )
we have determined all multiplicity - free permutation representations of the symmetric group .
saxl @xcite gives a list of all the possible subgroups of @xmath20 for @xmath21 which could be multiplicity - free .
our work extends saxl s list not only by including groups acting on fewer than 18 points but also by determining exactly which groups in his list are multiplicity free .
mark wildon @xcite has also determined which of the groups in saxl s list are multiplicity free , his focus is on groups acting on at least 66 points .
( saxl @xcite)[saxl ] let @xmath22 and @xmath23 .
if @xmath24 is multiplicity free , then one of the following holds : a. @xmath25 for some @xmath2 with @xmath26 ; b. @xmath27 and @xmath28 ; c. @xmath27 and @xmath29 with @xmath30 \leq 4 $ ] ; d. @xmath31 and @xmath24 fixes a point of @xmath32 $ ] and is one of the subgroups in ( ii ) or ( iii ) on the rest of @xmath32 $ ] ; e. @xmath33 where @xmath34 or 9 and @xmath35 is @xmath36 , @xmath37 or @xmath38 respectively .
bannai @xcite determined all the maximal subgroups with permutation rank less than or equal to five of the finite symmetric groups .
all of these representations are multiplicity free and , naturally , occur in our list as well .
there are several infinite families of groups whose permutation representations is multiplicity free and a long list of groups that do not belong to any of these families .
a complete list of the groups can be found in the tables in the appendix .
table [ table : transitive ] is a list of all the transitive primitive subgroups .
table [ table : imprimitive ] contains all the transitive imprimitive subgroups and the intransitive groups are given in tables [ table : intrans ] and [ table : intrans2 ] .
we list the infinite families here .
many of the groups in the list are subgroups of others in the list , we organized the list so a subgroups are below the groups that contains them .
[ thm : infinitefam ] the table below is a complete list of the infinite families of subgroups of the symmetric groups whose permutation representation is multiplicity free . [ cols="<,<,^",options="header " , ]
the eigenvalues for the association schemes were calculated using akihide hanaki s gap package `` elementary functions for association schemes on gap''@xcite . c. j. colbourn , j. h. dinitz , and d. r. stinson .
applications of combinatorial designs to communications , cryptography , and networking . in
_ surveys in combinatorics , 1999 _ , pages 37100 .
cambridge univ . press ,
cambridge , 1999 .
|
paper determine multiplicity - free permutation representations symmetric groups question subgroups multiplicity free permutation representation arose from problem determining largest collection set - partitions specific intersection start describing combinatorial problem results explain multiplicity - free representations symmetric group calculations using computational discrete algebra system gap @xcite @xmath0 integers with @xmath1 uniform @xmath2-partition @xmath3-set set - partition @xmath2 classes cardinality @xmath4 two partitions @xmath5 and @xmath6 qualitatively independent if one element common want large sets pairwise qualitatively independent partitions qualitative independence graph @xmath7 vertices uniform @xmath2-partitions two partitions adjacent qualitatively independent problem find cliques maximum size in @xmath7 for @xmath8 problem trivial graph @xmath9 clique @xmath2 prime power maximum clique @xmath10 @xmath11 5.4 few bounds on clique size @xmath7 known for other values @xmath3 and @xmath2 approach family graphs graphs @xmath7 @xmath5 @xmath6 uniform @xmath2-partitions meet table is @xmath12 array with entry @xmath14 meet tables isomorphic if permuting rows columns different orderings classes produce different isomorphic meet tables @xmath5 independent if all entries table positive each meet table @xmath15 graph vertices uniform partitions two partitions adjacent if table isomorphic to @xmath15 if @xmath16 entries in @xmath15 equal to one corresponding graph is @xmath10 family of graphs one for each meet table edges partition edges complete graph on uniform partitions if adjacency matrices commute standard eigenvalue methods obtain bounds on maximum sizes cliques mathon rosa show for @xmath17 @xmath18 family adjacency matrices commutative graph @xmath19 core @xcite graph @xmath10 core for all values @xmath2 first step determine if adjacency matrices for @xmath16 commute for all values @xmath2decide if matrices commute ? symmetric group @xmath20 permutations on uniform partitions matrices commute if permutation representation multiplicity free representation occurs with multiplicity 0 or 1 see @xcite section 29 determined all multiplicity - free permutation representations saxl @xcite subgroups of @xmath20 for @xmath21 multiplicity - free work extends list including groups on fewer than 18 points determining groups multiplicity free mark wildon @xcite determined groups multiplicity free focus on groups at least 66 points saxl @xcite @xmath22 if @xmath24 multiplicity free holds @xmath25 @xmath2 with @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath27 @xmath29 with @xmath30 @xmath31 and @xmath24 @xmath32 ii or iii @xmath32 @xmath33 where @xmath34 or 9 @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 or @xmath38 bannai @xcite determined maximal subgroups with permutation rank less than or equal to five of finite symmetric groups all representations multiplicity free occur in our listseveral infinite families groups permutation multiplicity free long list groups complete list in tables appendix table transitive ] list transitive primitive subgroups table imprimitive ] contains transitive imprimitive subgroups intransitive groups in tables intrans ] intrans2 list infinite families here groups list subgroups others organized list subgroups below groups infinitefam table below complete list infinite families subgroups symmetric groups permutation multiplicity free cols=" eigenvalues association schemes calculated using akihide hanaki s gap package elementary functions for association schemes c. j. colbourn j. h. dinitz d. r. stinson applications combinatorial designs to communications cryptography networking surveys in combinatorics , 1999 pages 37100 cambridge univ . press 1999
| 0.26421
| 1,563
| 802
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,718
|
measurements of the cosmological density parameter ( @xmath0 ) using techniques that exploit the gravity - induced motions of galaxies yield , in linear perturbation theory , the degenerate parameter combination @xmath1 , where the linear bias parameter @xmath2 is the ratio of the fluctuation amplitudes of the galaxy and mass distributions .
however , the relation between the mass and the galaxy density fields depends on the complex physics of galaxy formation , and it can in general be non - linear , non - local , and stochastic .
there is a growing consensus that the one - parameter model for bias is oversimplified .
this leaves us with the following question : what is the quantity that is actually being measured by the different techniques ? in order to address this question , we present estimates of @xmath3 from galaxy distributions constructed by applying a variety of biased galaxy formation models to cosmological n - body simulations .
we compare the values of @xmath3 estimated using two different techniques : the anisotropy of the redshift - space power spectrum and an idealized version of the potent method . in most cases , we find that the bias factor @xmath4 derived from redshift - space anisotropy or potent is similar to the large - scale value of @xmath5 defined by the ratio of rms fluctuation amplitudes of the galaxy and mass distributions .
however , non - linearity of bias and residual effects of non - linear gravitational evolution both influence @xmath3 estimates at the 10 - 20% level .
|
we estimate @xmath3 from a variety of simulated galaxy distributions , created by applying simple local and deterministic biasing algorithms to the mass distributions obtained from cosmological n - body simulations .
the * cosmological models * that we use are : ( 1 ) @xmath6 , cdm model with a tilted power spectrum designed to simultaneously satisfy both cobe and cluster normalization constraints .
( 2 ) @xmath7 , cdm , cluster normalized model . ( 3 ) @xmath8 , cdm , cluster normalized model .
cluster normalization requires that @xmath9 ( white , efstathiou & frenk 1993 ) .
the * biasing algorithms * that we use are : ( 1 ) semi - analytic : an empirical bias prescription derived by narayanan et al .
( 1999 , in prep . ) which characterizes the relation between the galaxy and mass density fields in the semi - analytic galaxy formation models of benson et al .
( 2 ) sqrt - exp .
( square - root exponential ) : a biasing prescription in which @xmath10 .
( 3 ) power - law : a biasing prescription in which @xmath11 . here ,
@xmath12 and @xmath13 are the galaxy and mass over - densities , respectively .
all the bias models are designed to yield galaxy distributions with an rms fluctuation , in top - hat spheres of radius @xmath14mpc , of @xmath15 .
the values of @xmath16 for the galaxy distributions are 0.6 , 0.58 , and 0.56 for @xmath6 , 0.4 , and 0.2 , respectively .
all the results have been averaged over four independent realizations of the cosmological models .
the simulation volumes are periodic cubes , with a box size of @xmath17mpc . the first method that we use to estimate @xmath3 involves the anisotropy of the redshift - space power spectrum .
kaiser ( 1987 ) and cole , fisher & weinberg ( 1994 ) showed that in linear theory , and under the plane - parallel approximation , the multipole moments of the redshift - space power spectrum may be used to estimate @xmath3 . here
we employ two different @xmath3 estimators : @xmath18 , the ratio of the angle - averaged redshift - space power spectrum ( monopole ) to the real - space power spectrum , and @xmath19 , the ratio of the quadrupole and monopole moments of the redshift - space power spectrum .
these ratios are , in principle , measurable , and they are related to @xmath3 as follows : @xmath20 , @xmath21 .
these ratios yield an estimate of @xmath3 at each wavenumber @xmath22 , and the scale dependence of this estimate is caused mainly by non - linearity in the peculiar velocity field .
it is possible to obtain a global estimate of @xmath3 by modeling this non - linearity .
we use two such models in our analysis : ( 1 ) exponential velocity distribution model ( cole , fisher & weinberg 1995 ) , where we assume that the galaxies have uncorrelated small scale peculiar velocities which are drawn from an exponential distribution .
we use this model in our analysis of @xmath18 ( the results of which are shown in fig .
( 2 ) empirical model ( hatton & cole 1999 ) , where the scale dependence of @xmath19 is found empirically by examining a large number of n - body simulations spanning a broad range of parameter space .
the second method that we use to estimate @xmath3 involves a direct comparison between the mass and galaxy density fields . the potent method ( bertschinger & dekel 1989 ) reconstructs the full three dimensional peculiar velocity field @xmath23 from the observed radial peculiar velocity field , allowing a measurement of @xmath3 directly from the linear theory relation @xmath24 .
we estimate @xmath3 using an idealized potent method , in which we have perfectly reconstructed the three dimensional peculiar velocity field .
we obtain the value of @xmath3 by fitting a line of the form @xmath25 to the @xmath26 vs. @xmath27 relation .
we perform this fit in the region : @xmath28 . by repeating this procedure for different smoothing of the velocity and density fields
, we can measure @xmath3 as a function of scale ( see fig .
figure 1 compares @xmath3 estimates from the two methods described previously to the function @xmath29 . here , @xmath5 is the bias function defined as @xmath30 , where @xmath31 and @xmath32 are the rms fluctuations of the galaxy and mass density fields , smoothed with a gaussian filter of radius @xmath33 , of the galaxy and mass distributions , respectively . in our full analysis , we also compare our @xmath3 estimates to the function @xmath34 . here
@xmath35 is the bias function defined as @xmath36 , where @xmath37 and @xmath38 are the power spectra of the galaxy and mass distributions , respectively . in the case of a simple , linear bias model , @xmath39 , all these definitions of @xmath2 are equivalent , i.e. , @xmath40 . in most cases ,
we find that the bias factor @xmath4 derived from redshift - space anisotropy or potent is similar to the large - scale value of @xmath35 or @xmath5 defined by rms fluctuation amplitudes . discrepancies at the 10 - 20% level may reflect non - linear dynamics as much as non - linearity of bias , since they also occur for unbiased models . in greater detail : ( 1 ) measurements of @xmath3 derived by fitting the cole et al .
( 1995 ) exponential velocity distribution model to @xmath18 underestimate the large - scale values of @xmath41 by about 10 - 20% for all cosmological models and biasing prescriptions .
( 2 ) measurements of @xmath3 derived by fitting the hatton & cole ( 1999 ) empirical model to @xmath19 accurately reproduce the large - scale values of @xmath41 for all cosmological models and biasing prescriptions .
( 3 ) measurements of @xmath42 derived from a potent - like comparison of @xmath26 , the negative divergence of the peculiar velocity field , to @xmath27 , the galaxy density field , underestimate the large - scale values of @xmath43 by about 10 - 20% for all cosmological models and biasing prescriptions , with the exception of the sqrt - exp . biasing prescription .
the sqrt - exp .
model gives erratic results because the non - linearity of the bias model makes the estimated @xmath3 sensitive to the range of @xmath27 used in the linear fit .
( 4 ) estimates of @xmath3 from the anisotropy of the redshift - space power spectrum approximately agree with those from the potent method on large scales , except in the case of the sqrt - exp . model .
benson , a. j. , cole , s. , frenk , c. s. , baugh , c. m. & lacey , c. g. 1999 , , submitted bertschinger , e. & dekel , a. 1989 , , 336l , 5 cole , s. , fisher , k. b. & weinberg , d. h. 1994 , , 267 , 785 cole , s. , fisher , k. b. & weinberg , d. h. 1995 , , 275 , 515 hatton , s. j. & cole , s. 1999 , , submitted kaiser , n. 1987 , 227 , 1 narayanan et al .
, in preparation white , s. d. m. , efstathiou , g. & frenk , c. s. 1993 , 262 , 1023
|
estimate @xmath3 from simulated galaxy distributions applying local deterministic biasing algorithms to mass distributions cosmological n - body simulations cosmological models are @xmath6 cdm model tilted power spectrum cobe cluster normalization constraints @xmath7 cluster @xmath8 normalization requires @xmath9 biasing algorithms semi - analytic bias prescription by narayanan et al . relation between galaxy mass density fields sqrt - exp . exponential biasing prescription @xmath10 power - law biasing prescription @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 are galaxy mass over - densities bias models yield galaxy distributions with rms fluctuation in top - hat spheres of radius @xmath14mpc @xmath15 values of @xmath16 for galaxy distributions are 0.6 0.58 0.56 @xmath6 0.4 0.2 results averaged over four realizations simulation volumes are periodic cubes box size of @xmath17mpc method to estimate @xmath3 involves anisotropy of redshift - space power spectrumkaiser 1987 cole fisher weinberg 1994 showed linear theory plane - parallel approximation multipole moments redshift - space power spectrum estimate @xmath3 employ two @xmath3 estimators @xmath18 ratio angle - averaged redshift - space power spectrum real - space power spectrum @xmath19 ratio quadrupole monopole moments ratios measurable related to @xmath3 ratios yield estimate @xmath3 at each wavenumber @xmath22 scale dependence caused by non - linearity peculiar velocity field possible obtain global estimate @xmath3 by modeling non - linearity use two models exponential velocity distribution model 1995 galaxies have uncorrelated small scale peculiar velocities analysis @xmath18 results fig 2 empirical model hatton cole 1999 ) scale dependence of @xmath19 found examining n - body simulations second method estimate @xmath3 comparison between mass galaxy density fields potent method bertschinger dekel 1989 reconstructs full three dimensional peculiar velocity field @xmath23 from radial field measurement @xmath3 from linear theory relation @xmath24estimate @xmath3 idealized potent method reconstructed three dimensional velocity field obtain value fitting line form @xmath25 to @xmath26 vs @xmath27 relation fit in region @xmath28 repeating procedure velocity density fields measure @xmath3 as function of scale fig 1 compares @xmath3 estimates @xmath29 @xmath5 bias function @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 rms fluctuations galaxy mass density fields smoothed gaussian filter radius @xmath33 compare @xmath3 estimates to function @xmath34 @xmath35 bias function @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 power spectra galaxy mass distributions linear bias model @xmath39 definitions @xmath2 equivalent @xmath40 bias factor @xmath4 from redshift - space anisotropy similar to large - scale value @xmath35 or @xmath5 rms fluctuation amplitudes discrepancies at 10 - 20% level reflect non - linear dynamics non linearity bias models measurements of @xmath3 fitting cole et al .1995 ) exponential velocity distribution model @xmath18 underestimate values @xmath41 10 - 20% models prescriptions measurements @xmath3 fitting hatton & cole 1999 model to @xmath19 reproduce values @xmath41 measurements @xmath42 comparison @xmath26 to @xmath27 underestimate values @xmath43 10 - 20% models prescriptions exception sqrt - exp . biasing prescription gives erratic results non - linearity model makes @xmath3 sensitive to range @xmath27 estimates @xmath3 from anisotropy redshift - space power spectrum agree with potent method large scales except sqrt - exp . model benson , a. j. cole s. frenk c baugh lacey g. 1999 submitted bertschinger e. dekel a. 1989 336l , 5 cole fisher weinberg 1994 267 , 785 cole 1995 275 , 515 hatton s j cole s. 1999 submitted kaiser , n. 1987 , 227 , 1 narayanan et al .preparation white d m efstathiou g. frenk 1993 262 1023
| 0.308531
| 1,734
| 926
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,722
|
we explore joint observations of the south - east limb made by _ hinode _ , _ trace _ and _ soho_/sumer on april 12 , 2008 as part of the whole heliosphere interval ( whi ) quiet sun characterization targeted observing program . during the sequence a large , 10 mm long
, macro - spicule was sent upward and crossed the line - of - sight of the sumer slit , an event that affords us an opportunity to study the coupling of cooler chromospheric material to transition region emission formed as hot as 600,000k .
this short article provides preliminary results of the data analysis . the solar optical telescope ( sot ; * ? ? ?
* ) of _ hinode _
@xcite has revolutionized our view of the dynamic chromosphere revealing the existence of at least two types of spicule @xcite . ``
type - i '' spicules are long - lived ( 3 - 5 minutes ) and exhibit longitudinal motions of the order of 20km / s that are driven by shocks resulting from the leakage of p - modes in regions around strong magnetic flux concentrations @xcite .
`` type - ii '' spicules , on the other hand , are a relative unknown that show much shorter lifetimes ( 50 - 100s ) , higher velocities ( @xmath0100 km / s ) , are considerably taller ( 5 - 8 mm ) and rarely exhibit any recession ( downfall ) of material that is ejected upward .
it has been demonstrated that both types of spicules undergo alfvnic motion @xcite .
however , in terms of chromosphere / transition region connectivity , there are several questions that are inadequately explained at present , but may be critical in understanding the interface of the cool and hot solar atmospheres : + 1 .
what is the relationship between chromospheric spicules and the emitting transition region structures observed above the limb ?
+ 2 .
how are these spicules heated and to what temperature ?
+ 3 . is the transition region really composed of two physically different `` components '' and do these spicule types play a role ?
+ 4 . what mechanism drives type - ii spicules ?
+ 5 .
do the unresolved transverse and longitudinal motions of the spicules produce the observed non - thermal line widths ?
+ these are points we wish to address with the whi joint observations and the detailed work is in its early stages .
the present paper discusses some of the interesting preliminary analysis pertaining to points 1 and 2 .
|
the purpose of whi jop204 was to characterize the behavior of the quiet sun ; aiming to build a better picture of the relationship between chromospheric dynamic spicules , their extension into the transition region and ( possibly ) corona .
in essence we hope to fully assess the role of magneto - convective driving mass and energy from the lower atmosphere into the quiet corona or solar wind .
jop 204 observations took place between april 10th through april 16th , 2008 involving a host of observatories on the ground ( nso ) and in space ( _ soho _ , _ trace _ , _ hinode _ , _ stereo _ ) .
we will discuss the preliminary analysis of data from _ hinode_/sot , _ trace _ and _
soho_/sumer @xcite on april 12th 2008 on the south - west limb that ran from 14:00 - 17:00ut . the correspondence between above - the - limb structure in _
ca ii h and trace 1600 passband image sequences is striking - noting that the 1600 passband is dominated by 1548 and 1550 emission lines of c iv there .
immediately , we see that while the emission observed in ca ii is considerably finer in structure the gross behavior and dynamics present are repeated in the mid - transition region indicating that material is at least heated to those temperatures as a spicule . by far
the most easily identifiable event to transpire was the passage of a large macro - spicule across the sumer slit at about 16:08ut , see figure f1 .
space - time analysis of the macro - spicule in the sot and trace image sequences shows that the ejected material follows a parabolic trajectory ( characteristic of type - i spicules ) with super - sonic launch and receding velocities of @xmath040km / s seen some 7 minutes later .
this event is clearly on a much larger spatial scale than the typical type - i and ii spicules which dominate the limb chromosphere and transition region .
we suggest that the structure seen is a macro - spicule driven by the large - scale reconnection of the photospheric magnetic field on the supergranular scale ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ) with the material driven upward by a shock , given the parabolic spicule evolution observed studying the dynamic behavior of this event is made complex by the non - trivial evolution of the line profiles with the increasing formation temperatures of the lines as shown in figs .
f1 and f2 . the right side of fig .
f1 shows spectral snapshots while fig .
f2 shows the space - time evolution of the fitted ( single gaussian fit ) spectra in the same lines .
we see the upward phase of the event in _ all _ the emission lines as the line centers are blue - shift by @xmath040km / s - consistent with the measurements from sot - indeed the cooler emission ( n iv and o vi ) show parabolic behavior in the space - time plots .
further , we also see that the profiles are asymmetric and get significantly broadened ( @xmath060km / s , a non - thermal line width of @xmath040km / s at these wavelengths - with sumer detector b ) over the entire duration of the event , indicative of unresolved velocities or active heating of the structure . perhaps the most startling thing , and
best seen in the bottom row of fig .
f2 , is that the ne viii emission of the macro - spicule is extremely weak ( only a few of percent of the background ne viii emission above the limb ) but as the material starts to fall , and we start to see red - shift , the excess hot emission is _ gone _ ; both the doppler and line width signature of the macro - spicule disappears abruptly while the emission from the cooler lines show downward motion .
the apparent disappearance of the hot emission provides a lot of questions for subsequent work and motivates the discussion below .
we have been able to successfully co - align data from _ hinode_/sot , _ trace _ and _
soho_/sumer for the whi qs period on april 12 2008 .
the data provide a tantalizing look at the dynamic evolution of ejected transition material and its interaction with the corona which surrounds it @xcite , the macro - spicule observed clearly reaches the formation temperature of ne viii ( 600,000k ; * ? ? ?
further , we speculate that the hottest material seen , based on the lack of returning ne viii emission , has actually become a constituent of the corona .
it is probably not a coincidence that this emission line is formed above the temperature at which thermal conduction is critical in the energy balance of the plasma @xcite and that ne viii is the coolest transition region species for which we see outflow in coronal holes ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
we suggest that the physical process required for such a `` hot mass - injection '' to the coronal magnetic system is intrinsically not one that can be studied in an single - fluid ideal mhd framework .
subsequent work will show that this is the proverbial tip of the iceberg in terms of our understanding of the transition region and its role in the heating and mass - loading of the outer solar atmosphere .
we would like to thank alfred de wijn ( sot ) , werner curdt ( sumer ) and dawn myers ( _ trace _ ) for conducting the observations discussed .
the work presented here is supported by a grant nnx08al22 g to swm and bdp .
bdp is supported by the nasa _ hinode _ grant to lmsal ( nnm07aa01c).the national center for atmospheric research is sponsored by the national science foundation .
|
purpose jop204 behavior quiet sun relationship between chromospheric dynamic spicules extension transition region corona assess role magneto - convective driving mass energy lower atmosphere into quiet corona solar wind jop 204 observations between april 10th through 16th 2008 ground space soho trace hinode stereo discuss preliminary analysis data from hinode/sot trace soho/sumer @xcite april 12th 2008 south - west limb 14:00 - 17:00ut correspondence between above - - limb structure ca ii h trace 1600 passband image sequences striking passband dominated by 1548 1550 emission lines emission in ca ii finer in structure behavior dynamics repeated mid - transition region material heated to temperatures spicule identifiable event passage large macro - spicule across sumer slit at 16:08ut figure f1 - analysis ejected material follows parabolic trajectory type - i spicules super - sonic launch receding velocities @xmath040km / s 7 minutes later event larger spatial scale than typical type - i and ii spicules structure is macro - spicule driven by large - scale reconnection photospheric magnetic field supergranular scalematerial driven upward by shock parabolic spicule evolution dynamic behavior complex by non - trivial evolution line profiles increasing formation temperatures in figs . f1 f2 right side fig f1 shows spectral snapshots fig f2 space - time evolution of fitted spectra lines upward phase event in emission lines line centers blue - shift by @xmath040km / s consistent with measurements sot cooler emission n iv o vi show parabolic behavior plots profiles asymmetric significantly broadened ( @xmath060km / s non - thermal line width @xmath040km / s sumer detector b duration unresolved velocities active heating structure fig f2 ne viii emission of macro - spicule weak few percent background material fall red - shift excess hot emission gone doppler line width signature macro - spicule disappears emission from cooler lines show downward motion disappearance of hot emission provides questions for work motivates discussion co - align data from hinode_/sot trace _ soho_/sumer for whi qs period on april 12 2008 data provide at evolution of ejected transition material interaction with corona macro - spicule observed reaches formation temperature of ne viii ( 600,000k speculate hottest material ne viii emission constituent of corona emission line formed above temperature thermal conduction critical in energy balance plasma ne viii coolest transition region species outflow in coronal holes process for hot mass - injection to coronal magnetic system not studied in single - fluid ideal mhd framework subsequent work show tip of iceberg understanding of transition region role in heating mass - loading of outer solar atmosphere alfred de wijn werner curdt dawn myers for observations work supported by grant nnx08al22 g to swm bdp bdp supported by nasa _ hinode _ grant to lmsal national center for atmospheric research sponsored by national science foundation
| 0.187541
| 1,237
| 616
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,726
|
the recently observed mass difference of the @xmath0 mixing is used to predict the branching ratios of the rare top quark decays @xmath1 and @xmath2 in a model independent way using the effective lagrangian approach .
it is found that @xmath3 and @xmath4 , which still may be within reach of the lhc collider .
= = # 1tempboxa= tempdima=0.5tempdima 0.5tempboxa -tempdima tempboxa # 1tempboxa= tempdima=0.5tempdima 0.5tempboxa -tempdima tempboxa # 1
|
with the recent start of the up and coming experimental program of the large hadron collider ( lhc ) at cern , the search for new physics effects at the tev scale enters into an exciting era .
in particular , due to the expected copious production of top quark events , clues of physics beyond the fermi scale could be evidenced .
the flavor changing neutral current ( fcnc ) transitions of the top quark are good processes to look for signals of new physics , since the new dynamical effects are likely more evident in those top quark processes that are forbidden or strongly suppressed in the standard model ( sm ) @xcite . in the sm , the fcnc top transitions @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 , and @xmath8 arise at the one loop level , being considerably gim suppressed , as they have branching ratios ranging from @xmath9 to @xmath10 @xcite .
the decays involving in the final state the quark @xmath11 instead of @xmath12 are much more suppressed due to kobayashi maskawa effects . on the other hand ,
the three body @xmath13 @xcite and @xmath14 @xcite transitions have also been studied within the context of the sm .
it was found @xcite the surprising result that the branching rations for these decays are respectively one order of magnitude larger and of the same order of magnitude when compared with the two
body @xmath5 decay . beyond the sm ,
fcnc top quark decays have been the subject of considerable interest in the literature , as they can have branching ratios much larger than the sm ones .
these type of top transitions have been studied in some extended theories such as the two higgs doublet model ( thdm ) @xcite , supersymmetric ( susy ) models with nonuniversal soft breaking @xcite , susy models with broken r
parity @xcite , models with extra @xmath15 gauge bosons @xcite , and even more exotic scenarios @xcite .
similar results were obtained within the context of effective theories @xcite . in this work ,
we are interested in using the mass difference @xmath16 in the @xmath0 mixing recently observed by the babar @xcite and belle @xcite collaborations to impose a bound on the branching ratios for the fcnc top quark @xmath1 and @xmath2 decays .
it turns out that due to electromagnetic gauge invariance , the @xmath1 transition is somewhat restricted , as it can occurs only through two electromagnetic gauge structures of dipolar type , which are characterized by lorentz tensor structures of the form @xmath17 ( transition magnetic dipole moment ) , with @xmath18 the photon momentum , or @xmath19 ( transition electric dipole moment ) .
the @xmath2 decay occurs through the analogous chromomagnetic and chromoelectric dipole moments .
these interactions are naturally suppressed , as they can arise in renormalizable theories only through quantum fluctuations of one loop or higher orders .
an outline of this paper is as follows . in section [ effective - lagrangian
] we briefly study the couplings arising from the effective lagrangian .
section [ contributions ] is devoted to obtain the leading contribution of the @xmath20 and @xmath21 couplings to the mass difference @xmath16 of the @xmath0 mixing .
finally , in section [ final - remarks ] we comment our results .
the most general structure for the @xmath22 and @xmath23 couplings arise from the following dimension six @xmath24invariant effective lagrangian : @xmath25 where @xmath26 and @xmath27 stand for left and right handed doublet and singlet of @xmath28 , respectively and a sum over quark flavor is implied . here ,
@xmath29 , @xmath30 , and @xmath31 are the gauge tensors associated with the @xmath32 , @xmath28 , and @xmath33 groups , respectively . on the other hand , @xmath34 , with @xmath35 the sm higgs doublet .
in addition , the @xmath36 are the coefficients of general @xmath37 matrices defined in the flavor space , whereas @xmath38 represents the new physics scale
. this parametrization allow us to treat in a model independent way fcnc transitions in the up quark sector and @xmath39 . ]
mediated by massless gauge bosons .
after spontaneous symmetry breaking , @xmath40 can be diagonalized as usual via the @xmath41 and @xmath42 unitary matrices , which relate gauge states to mass eigenstates . in particular , the @xmath43 and @xmath44 vertices are given by the following lagrangian : @xmath45 where @xmath46 are vectors in the flavor space .
notice the presence of the global factor @xmath47 , which arises from the higgs mechanism and is common to both electromagnetic and strong couplings . in the above expression ,
@xmath48 and @xmath49 are flavor matrices given by @xmath50 where @xmath51 gev is the fermi scale and @xmath52 ( @xmath53 ) stands for cosine ( sine ) of the weak angle . to generate vector
mediated fcnc effects at the tree level in the effective theory , it is assumed that the @xmath54 matrices diagonalize the yukawa mass matrix @xmath55 but not the matrices @xmath56 and @xmath57 . from the above expressions , it is immediate to derive the vertex functions for the @xmath20 and @xmath21 ( @xmath58 ) couplings , which can be written as @xmath59 where @xmath60 and @xmath61 .
in addition , @xmath62 and @xmath63 .
as we will see below , it is not possible to isolate the contribution of the @xmath64 and @xmath65 ( @xmath66 ) couplings from the @xmath0 mixing .
this contribution is given through an amplitude that depends symmetrically on both vertices .
due to this , it is not possible to obtain bounds for the @xmath6 and @xmath5 decays without making additional assumptions .
we now are in position of deriving the contribution of the @xmath20 and @xmath21 vertices to the mass difference @xmath16 of the @xmath0 mixing .
these contributions occur through short distance effects characterized by the box diagrams shown in fig.[fig1 ] . neglecting the external momenta ,
the @xmath20 and @xmath21 couplings generate an amplitude given by : @xmath68 the integral involved in ( [ qdiv ] ) is of the form @xmath69 with @xmath70 and @xmath71 , and it diverges quadratically at @xmath72 . as discussed in reference @xcite , the use of cutoffs to regularize quadratic or higher divergent integrals would violate the decoupling theorem , as this scheme introduce a strong dependence on the new physics scale . in our case , the use of a cutoff leads to an amplitude proportional to @xmath73 , which would overestimate our prediction .
only a logarithmic dependence on the new physics scale is physically acceptable @xcite ( for some applications of dimensional regularization in effective lagrangians see , for instance , refs .
thus , we do not use a cutoff to regularize our amplitude , instead we will use dimensional regularization , which allow one to convert the quadratic divergence into a logarithmic one through the following limit @xcite : @xmath74 . \label{eq2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the arising integral with logarithmic divergence , @xmath75 , can be treated in the usual manner , hence a renormalization scheme can directly be applied to the amplitude in ( [ qdiv ] ) .
once the integral is solved , one obtains the result for the amplitude : @xmath76 where the ultraviolet divergence is contained in @xmath77 , with @xmath78 and @xmath79 the euler s constant . here , @xmath80 is the dimensional regularization scale .
following refs.@xcite , the divergent term in this amplitude can be absorbed by renormalizing the appropriated coefficients of the complete effective lagrangian since it already contains all the invariants allowed by the sm symmetry .
the invariants needed to absorb the divergences are of the form @xmath81 , with @xmath82 and @xmath83 , etc . using the @xmath84 renormalization scheme with @xmath85 , the renormalized amplitude can be written as follows : @xmath86 where we have defined the dimensionless function @xmath87 .
it is easy to see that this amplitude can be obtained directly from a four quark effective interaction @xmath88 where the dimension
six operator @xmath89 is well known in the literature @xcite . in the above expression , a factor of @xmath90
was introduced in order to compensate the @xmath91 wick contractions . on the other hand , the mass difference @xmath92 is given by @xmath93 which in our case takes the form @xmath94 where the expressions for @xmath95 given in ref.@xcite were used . here
, @xmath96 is the @xmath92 decay constant .
we will use the cleo collaboration determination @xmath97 @xcite .
the factor @xmath98 is unknown , but lattice calculation @xcite leads to @xmath99 , although in vacuum saturation and in the heavy quark limit it approximates to the unity . in our numerical analysis
, we will use @xmath100 . using the value @xmath101 gev ,
one obtains @xmath102 from the experimental side , the heavy flavor averaging group @xcite interpretation of the current data leads to a mass difference of @xmath0 given by @xmath103 gev @xcite . to bound the @xmath104 coefficients
, we demand that the above contribution does not exceed the experimental uncertainty , which leads to @xmath105 where it was assumed that @xmath106 .
this assumption is reasonable @xcite , as a new physics scale in the tevs region is expected . considering the electromagnetic and strong contributions one at the time , one obtains @xmath107 , so that a conservative point of view allow us to obtain the bounds @xmath108 and @xmath109 without making additional assumptions . on the other hand ,
the branching ratios for the @xmath1 and @xmath2 decays are given by @xmath110 from these expressions and from eqs.([b1],[b2 ] ) , we obtain the following bounds for these decays @xmath111 where the approximation @xmath112 gev for the total top decay width was used .
it is worth comparing our results with those predictions obtained in some specific models .
most of the known results are on the @xmath6 and @xmath5 decays , which are strongly suppressed in the sm , with branching ratios of order of @xmath10 and @xmath113 @xcite , respectively .
the branching ratios for the decays involving the quark @xmath11 instead of @xmath12 are even more suppressed by a kobayashi maskawa factor of @xmath114 . beyond the sm ,
these branching ratios are considerably enhanced .
for instance , in the thdm - iii , the @xmath6 and @xmath5 decays can have a branching ratio in the range @xmath115 and @xmath116 @xcite , respectively . on the other hand , the respective predictions in some susy models @xcite
are of order of @xmath117 and @xmath118 .
an effective lagrangian analysis of higgs mediated fcnc leads to branching ratios for these decays of order of @xmath119 and @xmath120 @xcite .
all these predictions are consistent with our bound , as it is expected that the branching ratios for the @xmath1 and @xmath2 decays are lower by two or higher orders of magnitude than those involving the quark @xmath12 .
to conclude , we would like to comment on the possible detection of the @xmath1 and @xmath2 decays at the lhc . on the light of our bounds for their branching ratios
, one can conclude that they are within reach of this collider , given the important production of @xmath121 events of several millions per year . in a purely statistical basis those channels with branching ratios larger than about @xmath120 do have the chance of being detected .
however , the observability of a particular channel decay depends on several factors , background and systematics may reduce this value by several orders of magnitude depending of the particular signature . for instance
, the @xmath2 decay would require a large branching in order to be detected as it is swamped by hadronic backgrounds .
however , the important difference of about three orders of magnitude between the observability parameter and our bound makes quite possible the observation of this channel .
as far as the @xmath1 mode is concerned , it could be detected even with a relatively small branching ratio because it would be produced in a cleaner environment . in conclusion
, our analysis suggests that the recent observation of @xmath0 mixing does not exclude the possibility of observing the rare top quark decays @xmath1 and @xmath2 at the lhc .
since the @xmath122 and @xmath109 couplings are not directly constrained by this experimental result , their observation at the lhc would be more probable .
simultaneous contribution of the @xmath122 and @xmath123 couplings to the @xmath0 mixing .
the contribution of the @xmath109 and @xmath23 couplings also is given through this type of diagrams.,width=336 ]
we acknowledge financial support from conacyt and sni ( m ' exico ) .
|
recent start experimental program large hadron collider lhc ) at cern search for new physics effects at tev scale enters exciting era expected production top quark events clues physics beyond fermi scale could be evidenced flavor changing neutral current fcnc ) transitions top quark good signals new physics new dynamical effects evident in top quark processes forbidden or suppressed in standard model sm ) @xcite fcnc top transitions @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath8 arise at one loop level suppressed branching ratios ranging from @xmath9 to @xmath10 decays quark @xmath11 more suppressed due to kobayashi maskawa effects three body @xmath13 @xmath14 transitions studied sm branching rations for decays one order magnitude larger same compared with two body @xmath5 decay fcnc top quark decays subject interest branching ratios larger than sm top transitions studied in extended theories two higgs doublet model supersymmetric models with nonuniversal soft breaking broken r parity extra @xmath15 gauge bosons exotic scenariosresults obtained effective theories @xcite interested using mass difference @xmath16 in @xmath0 mixing observed bound on branching ratios fcnc top quark @xmath1 @xmath2 decays due to electromagnetic gauge invariance @xmath1 transition restricted through two electromagnetic gauge structures dipolar type characterized lorentz tensor structures @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath2 decay occurs through analogous chromomagnetic chromoelectric dipole moments interactions suppressed arise through quantum fluctuations one loop outline paper section effective - lagrangian study couplings section contributions leading contribution @xmath20 @xmath21 couplings to mass difference @xmath16 @xmath0 mixing final - remarks comment results @xmath22 @xmath23 couplings arise from dimension six @xmath24invariant effective lagrangian : @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 stand for left right handed doublet singlet of @xmath28 sum over quark flavor implied @xmath29 @xmath31 are gauge tensors associated with @xmath32 @xmath28 @xmath33 groups@xmath34 @xmath35 higgs doublet @xmath36 coefficients @xmath37 matrices flavor space @xmath38 new physics scale parametrization treat model fcnc transitions up quark sector @xmath39 mediated massless gauge bosons symmetry @xmath40 diagonalized via @xmath41 @xmath42 unitary matrices relate gauge states to mass eigenstates @xmath43 @xmath44 vertices @xmath45 @xmath46 vectors flavor space global factor @xmath47 higgs mechanism common electromagnetic strong couplings @xmath48 @xmath49 flavor matrices @xmath50 @xmath51 fermi scale @xmath52 @xmath53 cosine ( sine ) weak angle vector mediated fcnc effects tree level @xmath54 matrices diagonalize yukawa mass matrix @xmath55 not @xmath56 @xmath57 derive vertex functions for @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath58 ) couplings written @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 isolate contribution @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 ) couplings from @xmath0 mixing contribution amplitude depends symmetrically on both verticespossible obtain bounds for @xmath6 @xmath5 decays without additional assumptions deriving contribution @xmath20 @xmath21 vertices to mass difference @xmath16 of @xmath0 mixing contributions occur through short distance effects box diagrams in fig. @xmath20 @xmath21 couplings generate amplitude given by @xmath68 integral in form @xmath69 with @xmath70 @xmath71 diverges quadratically at @xmath72 cutoffs to regularize divergent integrals violate decoupling theorem dependence on new physics scale cutoff leads to amplitude proportional to @xmath73 prediction logarithmic dependence on new physics scale acceptable use cutoff to regularize amplitude dimensional regularization convert quadratic divergence into logarithmic through limit @xmath74 arising integral with logarithmic divergence @xmath75 treated usual renormalization scheme applied to amplitude in ( [ qdiv ] ) integral solved obtains result for amplitude : @xmath76 ultraviolet divergence in @xmath77 with @xmath78 and @xmath79 euler s constant @xmath80 dimensional regularization scale.@xcite divergent term amplitude absorbed by renormalizing coefficients effective lagrangian invariants symmetry invariants divergences @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 renormalization scheme with @xmath85 renormalized amplitude @xmath86 dimensionless function @xmath87 amplitude obtained from four quark interaction @xmath88 dimension six operator @xmath89 known literature factor @xmath90 introduced compensate @xmath91 wick contractions mass difference @xmath92 by @xmath93 form @xmath94 expressions @xmath95.@xcite used @xmath96 @xmath92 decay constant cleo collaboration determination @xmath97 @xcite factor @xmath98 unknown lattice calculation @xcite leads to @xmath99 vacuum saturation heavy quark limit approximates unity numerical analysis use @xmath100 value @xmath101 gev obtains @xmath102 experimental side heavy flavor averaging group interpretation leads mass difference of @xmath0 by @xmath103 gev @xcite bound @xmath104 coefficients contribution exceed experimental uncertainty leads to @xmath105 assumed @xmath106assumption reasonable @xcite new physics scale tevs region expected considering electromagnetic strong contributions obtains @xmath107 conservative view obtain bounds @xmath108 @xmath109 without assumptions branching ratios @xmath1 @xmath2 decays given by @xmath110 eqs. obtain bounds decays @xmath111 approximation @xmath112 gev total top decay width used comparing results with predictions specific models known results @xmath6 @xmath5 decays suppressed in sm branching ratios @xmath10 @xmath113 @xcite branching ratios decays quark @xmath11 suppressed by kobayashi maskawa factor @xmath114 beyond sm branching ratios enhanced thdm - iii @xmath6 @xmath5 decays branching ratio @xmath115 @xmath116 @xcite predictions in susy models @xcite @xmath117 @xmath118 lagrangian analysis higgs fcnc leads branching ratios decays @xmath119 @xmath120 @xcite predictions consistent with bound expected branching ratios @xmath1 @xmath2 decays lower two orders magnitude than involving quark @xmath12conclude comment on possible detection @xmath1 @xmath2 decays at lhc bounds branching ratios within reach collider production @xmath121 events several millions per year channels with branching ratios larger than @xmath120 chance detected observability channel decay depends on factors background systematics reduce value orders magnitude @xmath2 decay large branching swamped by hadronic backgrounds difference of three orders of magnitude between observability parameter bound makes possible observation channel @xmath1 mode detected with small branching ratio produced in cleaner environment analysis suggests recent observation @xmath0 mixing exclude possibility rare top quark decays @xmath1 @xmath2 at lhc @xmath122 @xmath109 couplings not constrained result observation at lhc more probable simultaneous contribution of @xmath122 @xmath123 couplings to @xmath0 mixing contribution @xmath109 @xmath23 couplings given diagrams acknowledge financial support from conacyt sni ( m ' exico )
| 0.435771
| 2,988
| 1,580
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,728
|
we study the effects of the chemical potential on the @xmath0 meson mass at finite temperature .
our preliminary results show that some effects are seen in the vicinity of the phase transition point .
although the signal is still too noisy to obtain conclusive physical results within limited statistics , the mass susceptibility is consistent with zero .
|
qcd sum rule analysis has suggested that a mass - shift occurs in proportion to the baryon density of medium . in nuclear matter , a few to 10 % reduction of vector meson masses is expected @xcite and confirmation of this fact is of current experimental interest .
although the importance of a quantitative investigation on this subject is obvious , it seems difficult to tackle it by present lattice technology.@xcite a new attempt to measure the derivative of mass @xmath1 in terms of the chemical potential , @xmath2 at @xmath3 has been made in this work . at @xmath4 , since the density depends cubically on @xmath5 , @xmath2 vanishes . on the other hand , at finite temperature , a linear dependence on the chemical potential
is expected and we will have a chance to see the density effect .
we use 2 flavors of the wilson fermion for the fermionic part of the action .
the action is given by @xmath6 where @xmath7 and @xmath8 stand for the gauge and the fermionic parts respectively , and @xmath8 has the form , @xmath9 for @xmath7 we use the standard wilson action .
the wilson matrix @xmath10 with chemical potential is written as@xcite @xmath11 \\ \nonumber & & -\kappa [ ( 1-\gamma_4)u_4(m)e^{\mu}\delta_{m , n+\hat{4 } } \\ \nonumber & & + ( 1+\gamma_4)u_i^\dagger(n-\hat{4})e^{-\mu}\delta_{m , n-\hat{4}}]\end{aligned}\ ] ] the hadron correlation function @xmath12 is given by @xmath13 where @xmath14 may be written as @xmath15 . to derive the expression of the mass susceptibility on the chemical potential , we take a derivative of @xmath12 with respect to the chemical potential @xmath5 . > from eq.([eq1 ] ) one obtains @xmath16 on the other hand from eq.([eq2 ] ) one obtains @xmath17 .
% \label{eq4}\end{aligned}\ ] ] eqs.([eq3 ] ) and ( [ eq4 ] ) should be equal to each other .
eq.([eq3 ] ) is evaluated by monte carlo simulations .
eq.([eq4 ] ) contains 4 unknown fitting parameters for a given @xmath18 .
@xmath14 and @xmath19 are determined from a fit to the hadronic correlation function of eq.([eq2 ] ) .
then these results are used for eq.([eq4 ] ) as fixed parameters and , thus the chemical potential dependent terms @xmath20 and @xmath21 are extracted from a two parameter fit to eq.([eq4 ] ) .
in the present study we aim at obtaining the mass susceptibility at @xmath23 . at @xmath23 , @xmath24 .
thus the calculation of eq.([eq3 ] ) reduces to calculate the remaining term @xmath25 .
now we specify the hadronic operator . for the present study
we take the @xmath0 meson operator , which is given by , @xmath26 we take @xmath27 here .
the derivative of @xmath8 with respect to @xmath5 is @xmath28\psi^i(m ) \\
\nonumber & & \equiv - \kappa \sum_{i = u , d } \sum_{n , m } \bar{\psi}^i ( n)[b_1 - b_2 ] \psi^i(m ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath29 @xmath30 let us consider @xmath31 where @xmath32 .
this term contains a connected and disconnected diagrams .
we neglect the disconnected part , which is unimportant for the present study .
eq.([eq5 ] ) is written as @xmath33 where the chemical potential @xmath5 is set to zero .
similar calculations are applied for the remaining terms ( for @xmath34 and for @xmath35 ) .
simulations are done on a lattice size of @xmath36 at @xmath37 . to find a finite temperature transition point ,
the polyakov loop and its susceptibility are calculated , as shown in fig.1 the finite temperature transition happens around @xmath38 . the chemical potential effect on hadron masses at @xmath23 is expected to start in the vicinity of the transition .
we take @xmath39 and @xmath38 for the present study .
we use 30 configurations generated by the hybrid monte carlo algorithm for each @xmath40 .
the configurations are separated by 40 - 50 trajectories .
figs.2 and 3 show the derivative of the hadronic correlation function @xmath41 with respect to @xmath5 as a function of the largest lattice direction : @xmath42 .
the hadronic correlation function is measured in the x - direction .
although the signals within the current statistics are still too noisy , we fit the data using eqs.([eq3 ] ) and ( [ eq4 ] ) . the mass susceptibility , @xmath43 ,
is consistent with zero , while @xmath44 could be finite and positive .
the effect of chemical potential on the mass susceptibility is suppressed by @xmath45 where @xmath46 is the baryon mass .
our results may show that @xmath46 at our simulation parameter is too heavy to obtain a reasonable signal within limited statistics .
our hope is that signal may be enhanced if a small quark mass is used .
one of the authors ( t.t . ) would like to thank electric technology research foundation of chugoku for financial support .
calculations reported here were done on ap1000 at fujitsu parallel computing research facilities and sx-4 at rcnp , osaka univ . 9 i.m.barbour , s.e.morrison , e.g.kepfish , j.g.kogut and m-p.lombardo , nucl .
b ( proc . suppl . ) 60a ( 1998 ) 220 t.hatsuda and s-h.lee , phys . rev .
c46 ( 1992 ) 34 .
p.hasenfratz and f.karsch , phys .
lett . 125b ( 1983 ) 308 .
a.nakamura , phys .
lett . 149b ( 1984 ) 391 , acta physica polonica b16 ( 1985 ) 635
|
sum rule analysis mass - shift to baryon density medium in nuclear matter few to 10 % reduction of vector meson masses expected confirmation current experimental interest importance of quantitative investigation difficult by present lattice technology new attempt to measure derivative of mass @xmath1 chemical potential at @xmath3 made at @xmath4 density depends on @xmath5 @xmath2 vanishes at finite temperature linear dependence on chemical potential expected see density effect use 2 flavors of wilson fermion for fermionic part action action given by @xmath6 @xmath7 and @xmath8 stand for gauge and fermionic parts @xmath8 has form for @xmath7 standard wilson action wilson matrix @xmath10 with chemical potential written as hadron correlation function @xmath12 given by @xmath13 @xmath14 written as @xmath15 to derive expression of mass susceptibility on chemical potential take derivative of @xmath12 chemical potential @xmath5 from eq.[eq1 ] obtains @xmath16 eq.([eq2 ] ) obtains @xmath17 eqs.([eq3 ] ) eq4 ) equal eq.([eq3 evaluated by monte carlo simulations[eq4 contains 4 unknown fitting parameters @xmath18 @xmath14 @xmath19 determined from fit hadronic correlation function eq.([eq2 ] ) results used for eq.([eq4 ] ) fixed parameters chemical potential dependent terms @xmath20 @xmath21 extracted from two parameter fit to eq.([eq4 ] ) aim mass susceptibility at @xmath23 @xmath24 calculation eq.([eq3 ] ) reduces to remaining term @xmath25 specify hadronic operator take @xmath0 meson operator given @xmath26 @xmath27 derivative of @xmath8 @xmath5 is @xmath28\psi^i(m__2 @xmath29 @xmath30 consider @xmath31 @xmath32 term contains connected disconnected diagrams neglect disconnected part unimportant for study[eq5 written as @xmath33 chemical potential @xmath5 zero similar calculations for remaining terms @xmath34 @xmath35 simulations on lattice size @xmath36 @xmath37 finite temperature transition point polyakov loop susceptibility calculated fig.1 transition around @xmath38 chemical potential effect on hadron masses at @xmath23 vicinity transition @xmath39 @xmath38 for 30 configurations monte carlo for each @xmath40 separated by 40 - 50 trajectories figs.2 3 hadronic correlation function @xmath41 @xmath5 largest lattice direction @xmath42 hadronic correlation function measured in x - direction signals noisy fit data using eqs.([eq3 ] eq4 ] ) mass susceptibility @xmath43 consistent with zero @xmath44 could be finite positive effect chemical potential mass susceptibility suppressed by @xmath45 @xmath46 baryon mass results show @xmath46 too heavy signal hope signal if small quark mass electric technology research foundation chugoku financial support calculations on ap1000 at fujitsu parallel computing research facilities sx-4 at rcnp osaka univkogut.lombardo nucl 60a 1998 ) 220.hatsuda.lee. c46 1992 ) 34.hasenfratz.karsch phys. 125b 1983 ) 308.nakamura 149b 1984 ) 391 acta physica polonica b16 1985 ) 635
| 0.259121
| 1,419
| 730
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,731
|
conventionally , cmd analyses of nearby star clusters are based on observations in 2 passbands .
they are plagued by considerable degeneracies between age , metallicity , distance ( and extinction ) that can largely be resolved by including additional passbands with u being most appropriate for young scs and i or a nir band for old globular clusters .
for star clusters that can not be resolved , integrated photometry in suitably selected passbands was shown to be as accurate as spectroscopy in independently revealing ages , metallicities , internal extinction , and photometric masses and their respective 1@xmath0 uncertainties , when analysed with a dedicated analysis tool for their * s*pectral * e*nergy * d*istributions (= * sed*s ) ( cf .
anders _
et al .
_ 2004a , b , de grijs _ et al . _
2003b ) . for external galaxies , rich star cluster populations
can thus be efficiently analysed using deep exposures in 4 suitable filters . again
, the inclusion of the u - band significantly reduces the uncertainties in the cluster parameters .
the age and metallicity distributions of star cluster systems yield valuable information about the formation history of their parent galaxies ( fritze - v. a. 2004 ) . here
, we present our galev evolutionary synthesis models for star clusters of various metallicities ( anders & fritze - v. a. 2003 ) , recently extended to include the time evolution of cmds , the dedicated sed analysis tool analysed we developed , show results on the basis of hst data , and first results from our salt pvp project on young star clusters in starburst and interacting galaxies .
|
studies of * s*tar * c*lusters ( * sc*s ) are interesting for many reasons : not only to learn about sc formation , evolution and destruction , but also because scs are valuable benchmarks for stellar evolution models . for instance , effects and typical parameters of stellar rotation and binarity can well be studied on homogeneous ( one age , one metallicity ) , reasonably sized samples of stars in clusters .
pixel - by - pixel analyses of hst acs multi - band imaging data for the tadpole galaxy , an ongoing merger , and other systems , with our galev evolutionary synthesis models have shown that sc formation is a major if not the dominant mode of * s*tar * f*ormation ( * sf * ) in starbursts and galaxy mergers with , e.g. , 70 % of the total u - band light coming from young scs in the tadpole , not only in the main body of this galaxy , but all along its 180 kpc long tidal tail ( de grijs _ et al . _
2003a ) . the antennae galaxies , a beginning merger of 2 large gas - rich spiral galaxies similar to the milky way and m31 feature thousands of young scs , many of them with radii and masses in the range of galactic gcs ( fritze - v. a. 1998 , 1999 , anders & fritze - v. a. _ submitted _ ) .
the hst wfpc2 images we analysed , however , only cover the innermost region of this nearby system at @xmath1 mpc .
salt s large field of view will make a great difference here .
while we can derive ages , metallicities , @xmath2 , masses and radii individually for all the clusters with precise enough photometry in at least 4 passbands , we can not say which or how many of these young massive compact scs will survive long enough to be called * g*lobular * c*lusters ( * gc*s ) in the end . an older version of essentially the same phenomenon , the already elliptical - like spiral spiral merger remnant ngc 7252 , however , still features more than 150 bright and compact scs with ages @xmath3 myr , i.e. very probably young gcs , since they have already survived the critical times during the violent relaxation process in this system .
we had predicted the possiblity that a secondary population of gcs could have formed in this system from our finding that as derived from the strength of the balmer absorption lines in the integrated spectrum of ngc 7252 the starburst on a global scale in this merger had a tremendously high sf efficiency , @xmath4 orders of magnitude higher than in normal sf regimes and well in the range of sf efficiencies required for the formation of strongly bound , long - lived clusters by hydrodynamical cluster formation models .
we also had predicted the metallicity for these clusters formed from pre - enriched gas in the spirals to be around @xmath5 ( fritze - v. a. & gerhard 1994a , b , fritze - v. a. & burkert 1995 ) . soon after hst had detected the scs ,
the metallicities of two brightest ones were spectroscopically confirmed to be around @xmath6 ( whitmore _ et al .
_ 1993 , schweizer & seitzer 1993 ) .
this shows that scs forming in abundance in gas - rich mergers are long - lived tracers of their parent galaxy s violent ( star ) formation history .
luminous elliptical galaxies are generally observed to show bimodal distributions for the optical colors ( mostly v@xmath7i ) of their gcs ( e.g. gebhardt & kissler - patig 1999 , kundu & whitmore 2001 ) , consistent with an early major merger origin of their parent galaxies but difficult to reconcile with hierarchical formation scenarios .
while the blue peak is fairly universal and consistent with old and metal - poor gcs like the ones in the milky way halo , the red peak seems variable in position and relative height . with one color only , however , it is not possible to determine age and metallicity differences between the two populations .
first optical - nir color distributions seem to show more structure than the optical ones ( kissler - patig _ et al .
_ 2002 , puzia _ et al .
_ 2002 , hempel _
2003 ) .
using galev evolutionary synthesis models for scs of various metallicities , we showed that secondary gcs from spiral spiral mergers can well explain the red @xmath8 peak of the gc color distribution in e / s0s , but also that a wide range of combinations of age and metallicity can hide within 1 optical color peak but should split up visibly in an optical - nir color like @xmath9 ( fritze - v. alvensleben 2004 ) .
gc multi - color distributions hence provide a valuable key to the formation history of their parent galaxies .
salt s extraordinary u - band sensitivity and its large field of view offer a great potential here , in particular with its future nir arm .
therefore , we have settled out to study sc formation and evolution in a wide range of nearby galaxies with salt , from normal galaxies with quiescent sf all through the strongest starbursts in massive gas - rich mergers .
our evolutionary synthesis models galev for star clusters and galaxies calculate the time evolution of cmds , integrated spectra , luminosities , colors , emission and absorption line strengths from 4 myr all through 16 gyr ( http://www.astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de/@xmath10galev ) .
they clearly show the great importance of the u - band for age and metallicity determinations of young stellar populations ( cf .
1 ) . ( b@xmath7v ) and
v@xmath7(u@xmath7v ) comparing two scs of ages 500 and 600 myr and metallicities z@xmath110.008 and 0.004 , respectively . while both scs lie completely on top of each other in the v@xmath7(b@xmath7v )
diagram , their rgbs are very neatly separated in v@xmath7(u@xmath7v).,title="fig:",width=245](b@xmath7v ) and v@xmath7(u@xmath7v ) comparing two scs of ages 500 and 600 myr and metallicities z@xmath110.008 and 0.004 , respectively . while both scs lie completely on top of each other in the v@xmath7(b@xmath7v )
diagram , their rgbs are very neatly separated in v@xmath7(u@xmath7v).,title="fig:",width=245 ] scs are easy to model , they contain one stellar generation with one well - defined metallicity . for a given initial mass function of the stars , e.g. salpeter
, the initial mass of the cluster determines its initial luminosity .
soon after its formation a sc starts losing mass and fades due to stellar evolution in a way that depends on metallicity .
the rate of fading , however , is different in different wavelength bands .
fading in all bands is fastest in early evolutionary stages and slows down later on .
in addition to this stellar evolutionary mass loss and fading , real clusters also lose stars from the tail of their maxwellian velocity distribution due to two - body relaxation , eventually enhanced by external gravitational forces .
this mass loss and fading is not included in our modelling . at a given age ,
the broad band luminosities in filters ubvrijhk determine the * s*pectral * e*nergy * d*istribution ( * sed * ) of a sc .
we have calculated a grid of @xmath12 seds for scs with metallicities in the range @xmath13 \leq + 0.4}$ ] , ages in the range 4 myr @xmath14 14 gyr , and extinction values @xmath15 using calzetti _
_ s ( 2000 ) starburst extinction law .
5 examples of seds for scs of solar metallicity , @xmath16 , and ages 8 , 60 , 200 myr , 1 and 10 gyr are shown in fig .
2 the mass of a cluster shifts the seds up and down . the strongest changes in the course of evolution are seen in the u - band relative to the longer wavelength bands .
. observed sc multi - band photometric seds can now be compared to this grid of model seds by means of a @xmath17 algorithm analysed ( anders _ et al . _
2004a ) to obtain ages , metallicities , extinction values , and masses of all individual scs including their respective @xmath18 uncertainties .
from these the age , metallicity and mass distributions of sc systems can be constructed ( anders _ et al . _
2004b ) that then give valuable clues to their parent galaxy s sf history .
artificial star cluster analyses have identified the best optical passband combinations for sc younger ( older ) than a few gyr to be ubri and ubvi ( ubvi ) . in any case , the u - band is important for ages , metallicities and extinctions of young stellar populations , while the nir is important for metallicities of old stellar populations .
a long wavelength basis and good photometric accuracy ( @xmath19 mag ) are essential in any case ( anders _ et al . _
2004b ) .
we stress that at typical photometric accuracies ( @xmath20 mag ) , broad band photometry with useful passband combinations is as powerful in disentangling ages and metallicities ( and extinction ) as is spectroscopy with typical s / n ( cf . also cardiel _ et al .
ngc 1487 is an ongoing merger of two spiral galaxies at a distance of 11.8 mpc with two pronounced tidal tails .
we are interested in its sc population as described above ( ages , masses , metallicities , extinction ) , but also in closely examining the merger - induced starburst over the entire system to assess the amount of sf that goes into cluster vs. field star formation .
10 min u- and b - band exposures were taken with salticam very early in the performance verification phase ( @xmath11 pvp ) with a point spread function ( psf ) of 1.96 arcsec fwhm and shown in fig .
an overlay of b - band surface brightness contours on the @xmath21 color map clearly reveals that the blue color peaks coincide with the highest surface brightness regions . a flux - conserving unsharp masking technique , developed by papaderos ( 1998 ) applied to the u- and b - band images reveals more than 100 compact sources fainter than 25 mag in b , a very encouraging result at this early stage and with only part of the total observing time we requested .
an improvement in the psf by about a factor 2 is expected by the time salt / salticam starts regular operations .
comparison with hst wfpc2 bvi data on the pc chip shows that with unsharp masking salt clearly resolves a wealth of sfing complexes .
the full analysis in the way described above requires additional observations in v and i and longer exposure times in u and b to reach fainter limits .
once the photometry is performed , which for this pvp object can be tied to the available hst photometry for absolute calibration , our sed analysis tool analysed will immediately return ages , metallicities , extinction , and masses for all the individual scs and star - forming complexes .
salt s large field of view and its unique u - band sensitivity make salticam an ideal instrument for multi - band photometric analyses of young and old stellar systems , not only star clusters as shown here , but also for galaxies ( see fritze - v. alvensleben _
et al . , this volume _ ) .
accurate multi - band photometry allows to derive star cluster ages , metallicities , extinctions and masses including their respective @xmath22 uncertainties ( as well as galaxy types , redshifts , star formation histories , masses and metallicities ) with accuracies comparable to those achieved in spectroscopic studies , but reaching out to much larger distances , and provide a valuable key to empirically constrain galaxy formation histories .
we greatfully acknowledge the salt astronomers and salticam instrument team for their very efficient and successful work and for their help with our initial data reduction problems .
we also greatfully acknowledge travel support from the dfg under fr 916/15 - 1 ( ufva ) and pa 1228/4 - 1 ( pp ) , without which we could not have attended this conference . + ufva cordially thanks jay gallagher for providing her the invitation to the inauguration of salt .
anders , p. , fritze - v. alvensleben , 2003 , a&a * 401 * , 1063 anders , p. , bissantz , n. , fritze v. alvensleben , u. , de grijs , r. , 2004a , mn * 347 * , 196 anders , p. , de grijs , r. , fritze v. alvensleben , u. , bissantz , n. , 2004b , mn * 347 * , 17 fritze - v. alvensleben , u. , 1998 , a&a * 336 * , 83 fritze - v. alvensleben , u. , 1999 , a&a * 342 * , l25 fritze - v. alvensleben , u. , 2004 , a&a * 414 * , 515 fritze - v. alvensleben , u. , gerhard , o. e. , 1994a , a&a * 285 * , 751 fritze - v. alvensleben , u. , gerhard , o. e. , 1994b , a&a * 285 * , 775 fritze - v. alvensleben , u. , burkert , a. , 1995 , a&a * 300 * , 58
|
studies of * s*tar * c*lusters sc*s interesting sc formation evolution destruction scs benchmarks for stellar evolution models effects stellar rotation binarity studied on homogeneous age samples stars in clusters pixel - by - pixel analyses of hst acs imaging data for tadpole galaxy merger other systems galev evolutionary synthesis models sc formation major dominant mode * s*tar f*ormation in starbursts galaxy mergers 70 % of total u - band light from young scs in tadpole 180 kpc tidal tail ( de grijs 2003a antennae galaxies gas - feature thousands of young scs many with radii masses in range of galactic gcs ( fritze - v. a. 1998 1999 anders hst wfpc2 images cover innermost region of system at @xmath1 mpc salt s large field of view difference can derive ages metallicities @xmath2 masses radii for all clusters with precise photometry can say which many young massive compact scs survive * g*lobular * c*lusters )older version same elliptical - like spiral merger remnant ngc 7252 features 150 bright compact scs with ages @xmath3 myr probably young gcs survived critical times during violent relaxation process predicted secondary population of gcs formed from strength balmer absorption lines in ngc 7252 starburst global merger had high sf efficiency @xmath4 orders magnitude higher than normal sf regimes range efficiencies required for formation strongly bound long - lived clusters hydrodynamical models predicted metallicity for clusters formed from pre - enriched gas around @xmath5 ( after hst detected scs metallicities of two brightest ones confirmed around @xmath6 ( 1993 1993 shows scs forming abundance in gas - rich mergers are long - tracers of parent galaxy s violent star formation history luminous elliptical galaxies show bimodal distributions for optical colors ( mostly v@xmath7i ) of gcs consistent with early major merger origin difficult to reconcile with hierarchical formation scenarios blue peak universal consistent with old metal - poor gcs red peak variable in position heightone color possible determine age metallicity differences between populations optical - nir color distributions show more structure kissler - patig puzia hempel 2003 galev evolutionary synthesis models secondary gcs from spiral mergers explain red @xmath8 peak color e / s0s range combinations age metallicity hide within 1 optical color peak split in optical - nir color like @xmath9 fritze - alvensleben 2004 ) gc multi - color distributions provide key formation history parent galaxies salt s u - band sensitivity large field of view offer potential future nir arm sc formation evolution nearby galaxies with salt normal starbursts gas - rich mergers evolutionary synthesis models calculate time evolution of cmds integrated spectra luminosities colors emission absorption line strengths from 4 myr through 16 gyr.astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de show importance u - band for age metallicity determinations young stellar populations scs of ages 500 600 myr metallicities z@xmath110.008 0.004 both scs lie on top in v@xmath7(b ) diagram rgbs separated in v@xmath7(u@xmath7v). two scs of ages 500 and 600 myr metallicities z@xmath110.008 and 0.004 both scs on top in rgbs separated in v@xmath7 scs easy to model contain one stellar generation one defined metallicity mass cluster determines luminosity after formation sc mass fades due to stellar evolution on metallicity rate of fading different in wavelength bands fastest in early evolutionary stages slows down later mass loss fading clusters lose stars from tail maxwellian velocity distribution due to two - body relaxation by gravitational forces mass loss fading not included in modelling at age broad band luminosities in filters determine s*pectral * e*nergy * d*istribution of sc calculated grid @xmath12 seds for scs with metallicities @xmath13 + 0.4$ ages 4 myr @xmath14 14 gyr extinction values @xmath15 using calzetti 2000 starburst extinction law 5 examples seds for scs solar metallicity @xmath16 ages 8 60 200 myr 1 10 gyr shown in fig . 2 mass cluster shifts seds strongest changes in u - band longer wavelength bands observed sc multi - band photometric seds compared to model seds @xmath17 algorithm ages metallicities extinction values masses of scs @xmath18 uncertainties age metallicity mass distributions of sc systems constructed clues parent galaxy s sf history artificial star cluster analyses identified best optical passband combinations for sc younger ubri ubvi u - band important for ages metallicities extinctions young stellar populations nir for metallicities old stellar populations long wavelength basis good photometric accuracy @xmath19 mag essential typical photometric accuracies @xmath20 mag broad band photometry with passband combinations disentangling ages metallicities extinction spectroscopy typicalngc 1487 merger two spiral galaxies 11.8 mpc two tidal tails interested in sc population ages masses metallicities extinction examining merger - induced starburst sf cluster vs field star formation 10 min u- b - band exposures taken with salticam early performance verification phase point spread function psf 1.96 arcsec fwhm shown in fig . blue color peaks coincide with highest surface brightness regions flux - conserving unsharp masking technique papaderos 1998 reveals 100 compact sources fainter than 25 mag in b encouraging result total observing time improvement in psf factor 2 expected salt / salticam starts regular operations comparison with hst wfpc2 bvi data unsharp masking salt resolves sfing complexes full analysis requires additional observations in v i longer exposure times in u b fainter limits photometry performed tied hst sed analysis tool ages metallicities extinction masses for individual scs star - forming complexes salt s large field of view unique u - band sensitivity make salticam ideal for multi - band photometric analyses of young stellar systems star clusters galaxiesalvensleben et al volume accurate multi - band photometry star cluster ages metallicities extinctions masses @xmath22 uncertainties galaxy types redshifts star formation histories masses metallicities accuracies comparable spectroscopic studies larger distances key constrain galaxy formation histories acknowledge salt astronomers salticam instrument team efficient work help data reduction problems travel support dfg fr 916/15 - 1 pa 1228/4 - 1 pp attended conference ufva thanks jay gallagher invitation inauguration salt anders , p. fritze - v. alvensleben 2003 a&a * 401 * 1063 bissantz fritze de grijs 2004a 347 * 196 2004b 347 * 17 fritze - v. alvensleben 1998 a&a * 336 * 83 fritze - v alvensleben 1999 342 * l25 fritze - v. alvensleben 2004&a * 414 * 515 fritze - v. alvensleben gerhard 1994a a&a * 285 * 751 fritze - v.alvensleben gerhard 1994b a&a 285 775 fritze alvensleben burkert 1995 a&a * 300 * 58
| 0.498348
| 3,065
| 1,546
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,736
|
( extended abstract ) = 13.5pt = 13.5pt
|
protein structure prediction plays an important role in the fields of bioinformatics and biology .
traditional protein structure prediction approaches include template - based modeling ( tbm , including homology modeling , and threading ) , and free modeling ( fm ) .
in particular , a threading algorithm takes a query protein sequence as input , recognizes the most likely fold , and finally reports the alignments of the query sequence to structure - known templates as output .
the existing threading approaches mainly utilizes the information of protein sequence profile , solvent accessibility , contact probability , etc .
the threading strategy has been shown to be successful in structure prediction of a great amount of proteins ; however , the existing threading approaches show poorly performance for remote homology proteins .
how to improve the fold recognition for remote homology proteins remains a challenge to protein structure prediction .
the sequences of proteins in remote homology generally show relatively weak signal of structure .
however , this does not mean that there is no sequence conservation hints for structure . the success of multiple - templates strategy implies the existence of common frameworks , i.e. some regions of proteins are conservative both in the structure and sequence .
such common frameworks should be responsible to the structural stability and then conservative in the evolution .
based on this we proposed a novel threading approach in three steps .
first , for each template , the common structural frameworks shared by its homologous proteins were calculated .
second , unlike in traditional threading methods where the alignment is made against the whole template , we aligned the query protein sequence against a common framework first .
this strategy avoids the drawback of the traditional threading approach , i.e. the alignment of variable regions beyond conserved motifs is prone to bringing in error .
third , the final alignments were generated via aligning query sequence against candidate full - length templates in the family .
briefly speaking , we run treethreader@xcite to build alignments of query against the new template database , and ranked alignments by e - value for model generation . finally , we generated models by modeller based on candidate alignments .
the generated models are ranked according to ddfire@xcite energy function .
for each template with known structure , all of its remote homology proteins are first identified based on structure alignment .
then , a linear programming was designed to identify the common framework shared by these remote homology proteins .
the common framework identification problem can be described as : given a collection of homologous proteins @xmath0 with length @xmath1 , the objective is to find @xmath2 segments with length @xmath3 with high sequence conservation and structural similarity . as an example , fig .
[ ilpobjective ] shows the common frameworks shared by protein 3gxr_a and its homologous proteins .
the common framework poses double - fold requirements , i.e. , significantly high sequence conservation and structural similarity . in the linear program ,
the objective function was designed to describe structural similarity , and the constraints were designed to describe sequence similarities .
specifically , the linear program utilizes a set of boolean variables to represent the location of conserved segments , i.e. , @xmath4 denotes that in the @xmath5th protein , the @xmath6th segment is located at the @xmath7-th residue .
then , the structural similarity objective and sequence similarity constraints can be described using @xmath8 .
the constraints were designed to represent the following requirements .
* for any sequence , the @xmath6th segment in common framework is unique ; * no segment in a common framework overlaps nor crosses .
* the segments should have significantly high sequence similarity .
the integer linear programming model can be described as : + @xmath9 @xmath10 where @xmath11 denotes the length of the @xmath5th protein , and @xmath12 denotes the pre - calculated sequence similarity matrix . in particular , the cell @xmath13 denotes the sequence similarity between of the segment starting from @xmath14 in the @xmath15th protein and the segment starting from @xmath16 in the @xmath17th protein . in our model
, the structure similarity is described using dscore @xcite .
@xmath18 where @xmath19 and @xmath20 denote the c@xmath21 distance of residue @xmath5 and residue @xmath7 in protein @xmath22 and @xmath23 respectively .
the final integer linear programming can be formulated as : @xmath24 @xmath25 where the indicator @xmath26 equals to 1 iff all the four item @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 equal to 1 , and 0 otherwise .
the indicator @xmath31 equals to 1 iff both @xmath32 and @xmath33 equal to 1 .
the @xmath34 and @xmath12 matrix are calculated in advance .
the cell @xmath35 denotes the approximated dscore of segments start from @xmath36 and @xmath37 in the @xmath15th protein and segments start from @xmath37 and @xmath38 in the @xmath17th protein .
[ c37111 ] shows the common frameworks shared by two domains in scop family c.37.1.11 .
the common frameworks has a dscore of 8.35 and an rmsd of 1.9 , implying a significantly high structure conservation .
for a total of over 27,000 proteins in pdb70 , updated at apr . 19 , 2014 , the common frameworks were identified to yield a database called topo .
the test set consists of 142 pairs of protein structures similar in structure but with low sequence identity .
traditional threading approaches , say hhpred , fail to build an accurate alignment between such protein pairs . in contrast , our alignment method successfully build accruate alignment ( tmscore@xmath39 ) for seven protein pairs , and generate accurate contact information for 45 protein pairs .
take a pair of protein 3dz1_a vs. 1twd_a as an example .
the two proteins share similar protein structure ( tmscore=0.56 ) ; however , the alignment generated by hhpred has a tmscore of only 0.22 .
in contrast , our alignment method generates an alignment with tmscore=0.43 .
unlike close homology proteins , remote homology proteins show weakly overall sequence signals of structure similarity . however , they still share common frameworks which carry strong sequence signals of structure similarity . aligning against the common frameworks instead of whole protein sequences
improves the fold recognition .
the study was funded by the national basic research program of china ( 973 program ) under grant 2012cb316502 , the national nature science foundation of china under grants 11175224 and 11121403 , 31270834 , 61272318 , 30870572 , and 61303161 and the open project program of state key laboratory of theoretical physics ( no.y4kf171cj1 ) .
this work made use of the einfrastructure provided by the european commission co - funded project chain - reds ( ga no 306819 ) .
|
protein structure prediction in bioinformatics biology traditional approaches include template - based modeling threading free modeling threading algorithm takes query protein sequence recognizes likely fold reports alignments to structure - known templates output existing threading approaches utilizes information protein sequence profile solvent accessibility contact probability threading strategy successful in structure prediction of great proteins ; show poorly performance for remote homology proteins improve fold recognition for remote homology proteins challenge sequences of proteins in remote homology show weak signal of structure no sequence conservation hints for success of multiple - templates strategy implies common frameworks some regions proteins conservative in structure sequence common frameworks should be responsible to structural stability conservative in evolution proposed novel threading approach in three steps for each template common structural frameworks shared by homologous proteins calculated aligned query protein sequence against common framework first strategy avoids alignment of variable beyond error final alignments generated via aligning query sequence against candidate full - length templatesrun treethreader@xcite alignments against new template database ranked alignments by e - value for model generation generated models based on candidate alignments generated models ranked ddfire@xcite energy function each template structure remote homology proteins identified based structure alignment linear programming common framework remote proteins common framework identification problem collection homologous proteins @xmath0 length @xmath1 objective find @xmath2 segments with length @xmath3 with high sequence conservation structural similarity fig . shows common frameworks protein 3gxr_a homologous proteins common framework poses requirements high sequence conservation structural similarity linear program objective function structural similarity constraints sequence similarities utilizes boolean variables represent location of conserved segments @xmath4 @xmath6th segment @xmath7-th residue structural similarity objective sequence similarity constraints described using @xmath8 constraints represent requirements @xmath6th segment in framework unique no segment overlaps crosses segments should have significantly high sequence similarityinteger linear programming model @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 length @xmath5th protein @xmath12 pre - calculated sequence similarity matrix cell @xmath13 sequence similarity segment @xmath14 @xmath16 protein structure similarity using dscore @xcite @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20@xmath21 distance of residue @xmath5 @xmath7 in protein @xmath22 @xmath23 final integer linear programming @xmath24 @xmath25 indicator @xmath26 equals to 1 @xmath27 equal 1 @xmath31 equals to 1 @xmath32 @xmath33 equal 1 @xmath34 @xmath12 matrix calculated in advance cell @xmath35 approximated dscore of segments @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath15th protein @xmath37 protein c37111 common frameworks shared by two domains in scop family c.37.1.11 dscore 8.35 rmsd 1.9 high structure conservation over 27,000 proteins in pdb70 2014 common frameworks yield database topo test set 142 pairs protein structures similar low sequence identitytraditional threading approaches build accurate alignment between protein pairs our alignment method accruate alignment tmscore@xmath39 for seven pairs accurate contact information for 45 pairs protein 3dz1_a vs. 1twd_a example two proteins share similar structure tmscore=0.56 ) alignment by hhpred has tmscore 0.22 our alignment method generates alignment with tmscore=0.43 remote homology proteins show weakly sequence signals structure similarity share common frameworks strong sequence signals similarity aligning against common frameworks improves fold recognition study funded by national basic research program of china national nature science foundation open project program of state key laboratory of theoretical physics by european commission co - funded project chain - reds
| 0.263711
| 1,488
| 744
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,739
|
we show that any @xmath0factor of a cubic graph can be extended to a maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph .
we also show that the sum of sizes of maximum @xmath0 and @xmath1edge - colorable subgraphs of a cubic graph is at least twice of its number of vertices .
|
we consider finite undirected graphs that do not contain loops . for a graph @xmath2 and a positive integer @xmath3 define @xmath4 are pairwise edge - disjoint matchings of @xmath5 , and let @xmath6 . a subgraph @xmath7 of @xmath2
is called maximum @xmath3-edge - colorable , if it is @xmath3-edge - colorable and contains exactly @xmath8 edges .
terms and concepts that we do not define can be found in @xcite .
the first theorem allows us to `` embed '' maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraphs of a cubic graphs into minimum @xmath9edge - colorings .
having done this , we can apply the results of @xcite for the investigation of our problems .
first of all let us show that the graph @xmath11 contains no path of length three . on the opposite assumption ,
consider a path @xmath12 of the graph @xmath13 , and let us assume that @xmath7 is properly colored with colors @xmath14 .
define the sets @xmath15 as the colors of the edges incident to the vertices @xmath16 , respectively . if @xmath18 , then there is @xmath19 with @xmath20 . now
, if we color the edge @xmath21 with color @xmath22 , then we would get a proper @xmath1edge - coloring of the subgraph @xmath23 , contradicting the maximality of @xmath7 .
thus : @xmath24 now , let us show that @xmath25 assume the contrary , that is @xmath26 .
there is @xmath19 with @xmath27 . now ,
if we color the edge @xmath21 with color @xmath22 , then we would get a proper @xmath1edge - coloring of the subgraph @xmath23 , contradicting the maximality of @xmath7 .
thus , ( [ unioncolors ] ) must be true .
since @xmath28 , then there is @xmath19 with @xmath29 . now ,
if we color the edge @xmath30 with color @xmath22 , then we would get a proper @xmath1edge - coloring of the subgraph @xmath31 , contradicting the maximality of @xmath7 .
case 1 : @xmath33 , that is , @xmath21 is a multiple edge .
note that @xmath34 , thus there is @xmath35 with @xmath36 .
now , if we color one of edges connecting @xmath37 and @xmath38 with color @xmath22 , then we would get a proper @xmath1edge - coloring of the subgraph @xmath39 , contradicting the maximality of @xmath7 .
case 2 : @xmath40 .
note that @xmath41 .
like in the proof of ( [ unioncolors ] ) , one can easily show that @xmath42 thus @xmath43 .
suppose that @xmath44 and @xmath45 .
consider the maximal @xmath46 alternating paths @xmath47 , starting from vertices @xmath16 , respectively .
note that there is @xmath48 such that @xmath49 .
now , shift the colors on the path @xmath50 to obtain a new coloring of the maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath7 , where the color @xmath22 is absent in both of vertices @xmath51 and @xmath38 .
now , if we color the edge @xmath52 with color @xmath22 , then we would get a proper @xmath1edge - coloring of the subgraph @xmath53 , contradicting the maximality of @xmath7 .
the proof of the theorem [ complementmatching ] is completed . for a @xmath56factor @xmath57 of @xmath2 , choose a maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath7 of @xmath2 with @xmath58 let us show that @xmath59 . on the opposite assumption ,
consider an edge @xmath60 and let us assume that @xmath7 is properly colored with colors @xmath14 .
due to theorem [ complementmatching ] , the edges adjacent to @xmath61 are belong to @xmath7 .
let @xmath62 and @xmath63 denote the colors of edges that are incident to @xmath64 and @xmath65 , respectively .
note that the maximality of @xmath7 implies that @xmath66 choose @xmath67 .
consider the subgraph @xmath68 , where @xmath69 is the edge that is incident to @xmath64 and is colored by @xmath22 .
note that @xmath70 is a maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph of @xmath2 with @xmath71contradicting the choice of @xmath7 .
the proof of the theorem [ 1factorextension ] is completed .
next , we prove a result which claims that the uncolored edges with respect to a maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph of @xmath2 always can be `` left '' in a given @xmath56factor , or , equivalently , any @xmath0factor of a cubic graph @xmath2 can also be extended to a maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph of @xmath2 .
[ 2factorextension]let @xmath57 be any @xmath56factor of a cubic graph @xmath2 , and let @xmath72 be the complementary @xmath0factor of @xmath57 .
then there is a maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath7 of @xmath2 , such that : for a given @xmath56factor @xmath57 of a cubic graph @xmath2 , consider a maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath7 of @xmath2 with @xmath75 let us show that @xmath76 .
we only need to verify that @xmath77 .
assume that there is @xmath78 such that @xmath61 belongs to neither of @xmath57 and @xmath7 , and let us assume that @xmath7 is properly colored with colors @xmath14 .
consider the edges adjacent to @xmath61 .
due to theorem [ complementmatching ] , these edges belong to @xmath7 .
if @xmath62 and @xmath63 denote the colors of edges that are incident to @xmath64 and @xmath65 , respectively , then the maximality of @xmath7 implies that @xmath66 suppose that @xmath79 due to @xcite , there is an odd cycle @xmath80 containing the edge @xmath61 , whose all other edges are colored @xmath81 and @xmath82 , alternatively , while the edges that are incident to a vertex of @xmath80 and do not lie on @xmath80 , are colored by @xmath22 . we need to consider two cases : let @xmath84 .
consider a proper partial @xmath1edge - coloring of the graph @xmath2 obtained from the coloring of @xmath7 as follows : @xmath85 is left uncolored , the edges of the even path @xmath86 are colored @xmath81 and @xmath82 , alternatively , the colors of the rest of edges are left unchanged .
note that the new partial @xmath1edge - coloring corresponds to a maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath70 of @xmath2 with @xmath87contradicting the choice of @xmath7 . 1 .
the edges that are incident to a vertex of @xmath80 , and do not lie on @xmath80 , are colored by @xmath22 and belong to @xmath57 , which and @xmath88 imply that : 2 .
all maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraphs @xmath70 of @xmath2 , which can be obtained from the coloring of @xmath7 , by leaving any edge @xmath89 uncolored , by coloring the edges of the even path @xmath90 @xmath81 and @xmath82 , alternatively , and leaving the colors of the rest of edges unchanged , satisfy the condition @xmath91 now , we consider a proper partial @xmath1edge - coloring @xmath92 of the graph @xmath2 obtained from the coloring of @xmath7 by deleting the colors of the all edges lying on @xmath80 . since @xmath80 is an odd cycle , we imply that there is an @xmath93 alternating path @xmath94 in the @xmath1edge - coloring @xmath92 that starts from a vertex @xmath95 and does not end on @xmath80 .
choose an edge @xmath96 , and let @xmath97 be the other edge of @xmath80 that is incident to @xmath98 .
* shift the colors on the path @xmath94 , and clear the color of the edge of @xmath99 that is incident to @xmath98 ; * color @xmath100 by @xmath22 , and color the edges of the even path @xmath101 by @xmath102 alternatively , starting from the edge @xmath97 .
it is not hard to see that the new partial @xmath1edge - coloring of @xmath2 corresponds to a maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath70 of @xmath2 , which due to ( ii ) satisfies @xmath87contradicting the choice of @xmath7 .
the proof of the theorem [ 2factorextension ] is completed .
there are graphs attaining bounds of the theorem [ maintheoremcubics ] .
the graph from figure [ examples attaining the bounds]a attains the first bound and the graph from figure [ examples attaining the bounds]b the second bound .
note that if there were a cubic graph @xmath2 attaining the two bounds at the same time , then we would have : @xmath105 thus , to show the absence of a cubic graph attaining all the bounds of theorem [ maintheoremcubics ] at the same time , it suffices to show the following suppose that @xmath2 contains a triangle @xmath109 that has no multiple edge .
consider a cubic graph @xmath110 obtained from @xmath2 by contracting the triangle @xmath109 to a new vertex . since @xmath111 , we imply @xmath112 .
on the other hand , it can be easily checked that @xmath113 ( in fact , with a bit more work it can be shown that one always has equalities here ) , therefore @xmath114contradicting the choice of @xmath2 .
the proof of the claim [ trianglemultiple ] is completed . before me
move to the proof of the next claim , let us also note that @xmath2 contains no edge that connects two triangles , since if there were such an edge , then taking into account that @xmath2 is connected , we would have that @xmath2 is isomorphic to the second graph from figure [ examples attaining the bounds ] , which clearly satisfies the statement of the theorem .
[ triangleneighbourmultiple ] let @xmath115 be vertices of a triangle of @xmath2 , and let @xmath116 be its multiple edge ( claim [ trianglemultiple ] ) .
assume that @xmath64 is the neighbour of @xmath117 lying outside the triangle .
then @xmath64 is not incident to a multiple edge .
[ triangleadjacent ] let @xmath121 and @xmath122 be vertices of two triangles of @xmath2 , and let @xmath123 be their multiple edges ( claim [ trianglemultiple ] ) . then , there is no vertex @xmath64 that is adjacent to both @xmath124 and @xmath125 .
[ triangleadjacentneighbours ] let @xmath121 and @xmath122 be vertices of two triangles of @xmath2 , and let @xmath123 be their multiple edges ( claim [ trianglemultiple ] ) .
let @xmath38 and @xmath129 be the neighbours of @xmath124 and @xmath125 , respectively , that lie outside the triangles
. then @xmath38 and @xmath129 are not connected by an edge .
first of all note that , due to claim [ triangleadjacent ] , @xmath130 .
suppose that @xmath38 and @xmath129 are adjacent , and let us consider the cubic graph @xmath110(figure [ trianglesadjacentneighbours ] ) .
[ triangleneighbourscommonneighbour ] let @xmath121 and @xmath122 be vertices of two triangles of @xmath2 , and let @xmath123 be their multiple edges ( claim [ trianglemultiple ] ) .
let @xmath38 and @xmath129 be the neighbours of @xmath124 and @xmath125 , respectively , that lie outside the triangles .
then , there is no vertex @xmath98 , that is adjacent to both @xmath38 and @xmath129 .
note that @xmath131 , hence @xmath112 .
it can be easily seen that @xmath132 therefore @xmath134contradicting the choice of @xmath2 .
the proof of the claim [ triangleneighbourscommonneighbour ] is completed .
the proved claims imply that the triangles of @xmath2 are placed `` sufficiently far '' , and this allows us to complete the proof by using the odd cycles corresponding to edges that do not lie in some maximum @xmath135-edge - colorable subgraph @xcite .
let @xmath7 be any maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph of @xmath2 , and let @xmath136 be its color classes , which are pairwise disjoint matchings with @xmath137 .
consider the @xmath138tuple @xmath139 , and for any @xmath140 define @xmath141 as the number of edges that @xmath65 is incident from this @xmath138tuple ( edges of @xmath142 and @xmath143 contribute to @xmath141 by two ) .
note that @xmath144=\sum_{v\in v}{\delta(v)}.\end{gathered}\ ] ] thus , to get the desired contradiction , it suffices to show , that @xmath145 * if a vertex @xmath140 lies outside these cycles , then it contributes to the sum ( [ maininequality ] ) by five ; * the total contribution of vertices of triangles from figure [ magictriangles ] ( a ) and ( b ) to the sum ( [ maininequality ] ) is twelve ; * the total contribution of vertices of triangles from figure [ magictriangles ] ( c ) to the sum ( [ maininequality ] ) is eleven ; * the total contribution of vertices of cycles from figure [ magicoddcycles ] ( a ) and ( b ) to the sum ( [ maininequality ] ) is @xmath146 , where the cycle is assumed to be of length @xmath147 ; * the total contribution of vertices of cycles from figure [ magicoddcycles ] ( c ) to the sum ( [ maininequality ] ) is @xmath148 , where the cycle is assumed to be of length @xmath147 .
thus , if we have a triangle with vertices @xmath115 , whose multiple edge is @xmath116 ( claim [ trianglemultiple ] ) , and @xmath64 is the neighbour of @xmath117 , lying outside this triangle , then if @xmath64 does not lie on either of these odd cycles , then @xmath149 on the other hand , if a cycle of length @xmath147 from figure [ magicoddcycles ] contains @xmath150 vertices , which are adjacent to a vertex of a triangle from figure [ magictriangles ] ( c ) , then the proved claims imply that @xmath151therefore the total contribution of vertices of these @xmath150 triangles and the odd cycle of length @xmath152 to the sum from ( [ maininequality ] ) is at least @xmath153as @xmath154 .
|
consider finite undirected graphs loops graph @xmath2 positive integer @xmath3 @xmath4 pairwise edge - disjoint matchings @xmath5 subgraph @xmath7 of @xmath2 maximum @xmath3-edge - colorable contains @xmath8 edges terms concepts in @xcite first theorem maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraphs into minimum @xmath9edge - colorings apply results @xcite investigation problems show graph @xmath11 no path length three consider path @xmath12 graph @xmath13 assume @xmath7 colored with colors @xmath14 define sets @xmath15 colors edges vertices @xmath16 @xmath18 @xmath19 with @xmath20 color edge @xmath21 with color @xmath22 proper @xmath1edge - coloring subgraph @xmath23 contradicting maximality @xmath7 @xmath25 assume contrary @xmath26 @xmath19 with @xmath27 color edge @xmath21 with color @xmath22 proper @xmath1edge - coloring subgraph @xmath23 contradicting maximality @xmath7 unioncolors must be true@xmath28 @xmath19 with @xmath29 color edge @xmath30 with @xmath22 proper @xmath1edge - coloring subgraph @xmath31 contradicting maximality @xmath7 case 1 @xmath33 @xmath21 multiple edge @xmath34 @xmath35 with @xmath36 color @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath22 proper @xmath1edge - coloring subgraph @xmath39 contradicting maximality @xmath7 2 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 paths @xmath47 vertices @xmath16 @xmath48 @xmath49 shift colors path @xmath50 new coloring @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath7 color @xmath22 absent vertices @xmath51 @xmath38 color edge @xmath52 with @xmath22 proper @xmath1edge - coloring subgraph @xmath53 contradicting maximality @xmath7 proof theorem complementmatching completed @xmath56factor @xmath57 @xmath2 maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath7 with @xmath58 @xmath59opposite assumption consider edge @xmath60 @xmath7 colored colors @xmath14 complementmatching edges adjacent @xmath61 @xmath7 @xmath62 @xmath63 denote colors edges @xmath64 @xmath65 maximality @xmath7 implies @xmath66 @xmath67 consider subgraph @xmath68 @xmath69 edge incident @xmath64 colored by @xmath22 @xmath70 maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath2 @xmath71contradicting choice @xmath7 proof theorem 1factorextension completed prove result uncolored edges maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath2 left in @xmath56factor @xmath0factor extended maximum @xmath1edge colorable subgraph 2factorextension @xmath57 @xmath56factor @xmath72 complementary @xmath0factor @xmath57 maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath7 of @xmath2 @xmath56factor @xmath57 consider maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath7 @xmath2 @xmath75 show @xmath76 verify @xmath77@xmath78 @xmath61 belongs @xmath57 @xmath7 @xmath7 colored colors @xmath14 consider edges adjacent @xmath61 complementmatching belong @xmath7 @xmath62 @xmath63 denote colors edges incident @xmath64 @xmath65 maximality @xmath7 implies @xmath66 @xmath79 odd cycle @xmath80 containing edge @xmath61 edges colored @xmath81 @xmath82 edges incident vertex @xmath80 colored by @xmath22 consider two cases @xmath84 partial @xmath1edge - coloring @xmath2 @xmath7 @xmath85 uncolored edges even path @xmath86 colored @xmath81 @xmath82 colors rest edges unchanged new partial @xmath1edge - coloring corresponds maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath70 @xmath2 @xmath87contradicting choice @xmath7 edges incident to vertex @xmath80 not @xmath80 colored by @xmath22 belong to @xmath57 @xmath88 implymaximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraphs @xmath70 @xmath2 obtained from coloring @xmath7 leaving edge @xmath89 uncolored coloring edges even path @xmath90 unchanged satisfy condition @xmath91 consider partial @xmath1edge - coloring @xmath92 from @xmath7 deleting colors edges @xmath80 odd cycle imply @xmath93 alternating path @xmath94 coloring starts from vertex @xmath95 end on @xmath80 choose edge @xmath96 let @xmath97 other edge @xmath80 incident to @xmath98 shift colors path @xmath94 clear color edge @xmath99 incident to @xmath98 color @xmath100 by @xmath22 color edges even path @xmath101 by @xmath102 starting from edge @xmath97 new partial @xmath1edge - coloring @xmath2 corresponds to maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath70 of @xmath2 satisfies @xmath87contradicting choice @xmath7 proof of theorem 2factorextension completed graphs attaining bounds theorem attains first secondif cubic graph @xmath2 attaining two bounds we have : @xmath105 show absence of cubic graph attaining all bounds of theorem [ to show @xmath2 contains triangle @xmath109 no multiple edge consider cubic graph @xmath110 obtained from @xmath2 by contracting triangle @xmath109 to new vertex since @xmath111 imply @xmath112 checked @xmath113 @xmath114contradicting choice @xmath2 proof of claim [ trianglemultiple ] completed next claim @xmath2 contains no edge connects two triangles if @xmath2 isomorphic to second graph from figure satisfies statement of theorem triangleneighbourmultiple ] let @xmath115 be vertices of triangle of @xmath2 @xmath116 be its multiple edge @xmath64 is neighbour of @xmath117 outside triangle @xmath64 not incident to multiple edge triangleadjacent ] let @xmath121 and @xmath122 be vertices of two triangles of @xmath2 @xmath123 be multiple edges no vertex @xmath64 adjacent to @xmath124 and @xmath125triangleadjacentneighbours @xmath121 @xmath122 vertices of triangles @xmath2 @xmath123 multiple edges @xmath38 @xmath129 neighbours of @xmath124 @xmath125 outside triangles @xmath38 @xmath129 not connected by edge claim triangleadjacent @xmath130 @xmath38 @xmath129 adjacent consider cubic @xmath110(figure trianglesadjacentneighbours triangleneighbourscommonneighbour @xmath121 @xmath122 vertices of triangles @xmath2 @xmath123 multiple edges @xmath38 @xmath129 neighbours of @xmath124 @xmath125 outside triangles no vertex @xmath98 adjacent to @xmath38 @xmath129 @xmath131 hence @xmath112 @xmath132 @xmath134contradicting choice @xmath2 proof claim triangleneighbourscommonneighbour completed proved claims imply triangles of @xmath2 sufficiently far complete proof odd cycles edges not maximum @xmath135-edge - colorable subgraph @xmath7 be maximum @xmath1edge - colorable subgraph @xmath2 @xmath136 color classes pairwise disjoint matchings with @xmath137consider @xmath138tuple @xmath139 @xmath140 define @xmath141 as number edges @xmath65 incident from @xmath138tuple edges of @xmath142 and @xmath143 contribute to @xmath141 by two @xmath144=\sum_{v\in v}{\delta(v)}.\end{gathered} desired contradiction show @xmath145 vertex @xmath140 outside cycles contributes to sum by five total contribution vertices triangles from figure [ magictriangles ] ( a ) b ) to sum twelve contribution figure ( c ) to sum eleven total contribution vertices cycles from to sum is @xmath146 cycle assumed length @xmath147 total contribution vertices from figure ] ( c ) to sum is @xmath148 cycle assumed of length @xmath147triangle with vertices @xmath115 multiple edge @xmath116 @xmath64 neighbour of @xmath117 outside triangle if @xmath64 lie on odd cycles @xmath149 cycle @xmath147 from figure magicoddcycles contains @xmath150 vertices adjacent to vertex triangle proved claims imply @xmath151therefore total contribution of vertices @xmath150 triangles odd cycle @xmath152 to sum maininequality is at least @xmath153as @xmath154
| 0.558771
| 3,536
| 1,998
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,741
|
we discuss possibilities of measurement of deeply virtual compton scattering amplitudes via different asymmetries in order to access the underlying skewed parton distributions .
perturbative one - loop coefficient functions and two - loop evolution kernels , calculated recently by a tentative use of residual conformal symmetry of qcd , are used for a model dependent numerical estimation of scattering amplitudes .
|
the asymptotic freedom of qcd allows to calculate short distance quantities perturbatively form the first principles .
together with the use of factorization theorems , the cross sections for ( semi-)inclusive reactions are predicted at a large scale as a convolution of perturbative parton cross sections and long distance parton distributions . in the case of exclusive reactions , such as two - photon reactions in the light - cone
dominated region or diffractive processes , the amplitudes factorizes in hard - scattering amplitudes and hadron distribution amplitudes and/or skewed parton distributions ( spd ) .
such distributions were already proposed in the past @xcite and they become more popular nowadays @xcite since it has been realized their vital rle for the proper description of the mentioned reactions . moreover , as it was pointed out by j. xi , their measurement can clarify the issue of how the hadron total angular momentum is distributed among its constiutents .
one can expect that the study of the spds will be one of the central issues of hadronic physics in nearest future . a promising way to access
the spds is to probe the nucleon with a highly virtual photon via the compton scattering process , which is called deeply virtual compton scattering ( dvcs ) .
indeed , it is auspicious that a first evidence of experimental feasibility to detect such a signal has been revealed by the zeus collaboration @xcite . on the theoretical side the factorization of the collinear singularities has been proved at leading twist - two level to all orders in coupling @xcite .
the local version of the ope does not converge in the considered kinematical region . fortunately
, this problem can be overcome by a non - local light - cone expansion in terms of light - ray operators @xcite .
moreover , from the renormalization group equation of these operators one can derive in a straightforward manner the evolution equations for spds . here
we shortly review our approach to complete next - to - leading ( nlo ) calculation , which is accomplished by a heavy use of the conformal symmetry to map the known results from forward deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) to the non - forward kinematics of dvcs and simple one - loop addenda .
the problems within our modus operandi have been resolved by employing conformal ward identities and constraints arising from the algebra of the collinear conformal group @xcite .
the virtual compton scattering ( vcs ) process on a nucleon can be measured in the reaction @xmath0 however , as shown in fig .
[ dvcs&bh ] , there is contamination from the so - called bethe - heitler ( bh ) process in which the final real photon is radiated from the lepton beam .
thus , the scattering amplitude square @xmath1 in the cross section , @xmath2 contains beside the vcs and bh parts also the interference term : @xmath3 the bh - amplitude is purely real and is given as a contraction of the leptonic tensor @xmath4 u(k , \lambda)\ ] ] with the hadronic current @xmath5 : @xmath6 since dirac and pauli form factors @xmath7 and @xmath8 are ( partially ) known from experimental measurements and can be parametrized to a certain accuracy by double dipole formulae , one can disentangle the content of the hadronic tensor @xmath9 : @xmath10 this tensor , defined by the time ordered product of two electromagnetic currents @xmath11 is a result of parity invariance . ] independent kinematical structures @xcite . measuring the cross section ( [ cross - section - def ] ) in quite different experiments : with negatively or positively charged lepton beam , with ( un)polarized beam or ( un)polarized target , the rich structure of the hadronic tensor can be explored in different kinematical regions . in the following we are interested in dvcs , where @xmath12 is large and
@xmath13 is small .
unfortunately , since the dvcs amplitude ( [ vcs - amplitude ] ) decreases with increasing @xmath14 while the bh amplitude ( [ bh - amplitude ] ) grows up with decreasing @xmath13 , in this kinematics it will be a delicate task to extract the vcs amplitude for large virtualities @xmath15 and especially low @xmath13 from experimental data .
on the other hand it is promising to look for asymmetries which allow one to measure the interference term directly and get in this way access to the real and imaginary part of the dvcs amplitude @xcite : 1 .
@xmath16 2 .
( either the lepton - beam or the nucleon is polarized ) @xmath17 3 .
@xmath18 where @xmath19 with @xmath20 is the azimuthal angle of the final nucleon ( lepton ) .
to describe different `` two - photon '' processes in the light - cone dominated region in a unique way , we generalize the bjorken limit and introduce the scaling variables : @xmath21 where @xmath22 is related to the bjorken variable @xmath23 and @xmath24 is the so - called skewedness parameter .
formally , this parameter interpolates between different processes as given in table [ tab - kinlcd ] .
.[tab - kinlcd ] the value of the scaling variable @xmath24 for different two - photon processes .
[ cols="<,^ , < " , ] since in the case of dvcs the longitudinal part of the hadronic tensor vanishes , there are only two kinematical structures left to leading twist - two accuracy : @xmath25 here the transverse part of the metric tensor , denoted by @xmath26 , and the @xmath27-tensor are contracted with the projection operators @xmath28 : @xmath29 , @xmath30 .
the appearing amplitudes can be calculated by means of the ope .
in contrast to the case of dis , a larger number of ( local ) operators and their wilson coefficients contribute in the non - forward case .
fortunately , we can appreciate the conformal ope ( cope ) @xcite , which tells us that all wilson coefficients are fixed up to an overall normalization , which can be taken from known results in dis .
the conformal operators appearing in the cope are : @xmath31 where @xmath32 and @xmath33 .
the @xmath34 and @xmath35 components are obtained by contraction with the two light - like vectors @xmath36 and @xmath37 , such that @xmath38 and @xmath39 .
they carry the spin quantum number @xmath40 and the conformal spin @xmath41 . in the conformal subtraction ( cs )
scheme their mixing is only induced by the trace anomaly and proportional to @xmath42 @xcite : @xmath43 the anomalous dimension matrix @xmath44 is , up to a normalization factor in the mixed channels , the same as in dis .
unfortunately , for the case of dvcs kinematics the cope in its local version does not converge .
thus , it is necessary to resum the local operators into so - called light - ray ones .
this provide us a definition for the spds : @xmath45 the momentum fractions of the incoming [ outgoing ] parton is @xmath46 [ @xmath47 . a form factor decomposition would give us the functions @xmath48 , @xmath49 and @xmath50 , @xmath51 for the parity even and odd sectors , respectively , as introduced by ji @xcite .
next we have to reconstruct the coefficient functions appearing in @xmath52,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath53 , @xmath54 and the sum runs over quark species @xmath55 with electrical charge @xmath56 .
the convolution is defined by @xmath57 .
this task can be achieved by some manipulation of the cope and , e.g. for the flavour non - singlet case , can be cast into the form @xmath58 the evolution kernel @xmath59 and the coefficient function @xmath60 are diagonal w.r.t .
the conformal waves the gegenbauer polynomials : @xmath61 and their eigenvalues @xmath62 and @xmath63 coincide with anomalous dimensions and wilson coefficients , respectively , which appear in dis .
a closed form of the function @xmath64 can be deduced order by order in @xmath65 from the sum @xmath66 conformal covariance does not hold true in the minimal subtraction ( ms ) scheme .
the transformation , which rotates the cs result ( [ nonloc - t ] -[def - f ] ) to the minimal one , is induced by the conformal anomalies appearing in the ms scheme
. the rotation matrix can be found by study of the conformal ward identities for green functions with operator insertions and calculating the anomalous contributions via ( modified ) feynman rules . indeed , the off - diagonal piece of the anomalous dimension matrix to nlo is induced by the special conformal anomaly matrix @xmath67 and the first coefficient of the @xmath42-function @xcite : @xmath68_{jk } \over 2 ( j - k)(j + k + 3 ) } , \
\mbox{\boldmath $ b$}_{jk } = - \left [ 1 + ( -1)^{j - k } \right]\theta_{jk } ( 2 k + 3 ) \mbox{\boldmath $ 1 $ } .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the remaining task to transform the coefficient functions to the ms scheme have been solved already in @xcite . in the case of dvcs , they are nothing else as the analytical continuation of the hard - scattering amplitudes for the meson production by two photon - collision . in the case of the axial - vector channel they read : @xmath69 , \nonumber \\ { ^{g}\!t^{a(1 ) } } \!\!\!&=&\!\!\ !
\frac{n_f}{2 } \left [ \left ( \frac{1}{1 - t^2 } + \frac{\ln\frac{1 - t}{2}}{(1 + t)^2 } \right ) \left ( \ln\frac{1 - t}{2 } - 2 \right ) -
\frac{\ln^2 \frac{1 - t}{2}}{2(1 + t)^2 } \right ] .
\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ]
there are different proposals for modeling the spd . here
we will deal only with two of them , equating the spd equal to the forward parton distributions ( fpd - model ) and using the proposal of radyushkin for the ansatz of the double distribution ( dd ) functions @xcite @xmath70 , where the profile function @xmath71 for quarks and gluons are given by @xmath72 ^ 2 - z_-^2 } { [ 1 - |z_+|]^3 } , \qquad { ^{g}\!\pi } ( z_- , z_+ ) = \frac{15}{16 } \frac { \left\ { [ 1 - |z_+|]^2 - z_-^2 \right\}^2}{[1 - |z_+|]^5},\ ] ] the spd is obtained by an integration @xcite : @xmath73 we apply the dd model at different scales . to evolve the spd ,
we expand them : @xmath74 in terms of legendre polynomials and express the expansion coefficients @xmath75 in terms of conformal moments which evolution is governed by the anomalous dimension matrix ( [ adcodt ] ) .
this method is suited for not too small @xmath24 . in fig .
[ figinp ] we show our input distributions at a scale of @xmath76 .
let us also mention , that the relative nlo corrections due to the evolution are as expected not very large .
starting at an input scale of 0.7 gev , we found that the nlo corrections do not exceed 10% to 30% @xcite .
for the numerical estimation of the hard - scattering amplitudes ( [ def - t ] ) we perform also an expansion with respect to legendre polynomials which allows us to include easily evolution effects . however , this method is not appropriate to study the low @xmath77 region . in general
we found that the nlo corrections for @xmath78 are typically of the order of 20 - 50% ( see fig .
[ pred1]a ) . in special cases ,
e.g. for the dd model with mrs parameterization , it can even be much larger .
fortunately , there is partial cancellation of perturbative corrections in the ratio of real to imaginary part . as shown in fig .
[ pred1]b , this ratio is model dependent and may its measurement can be used to get a deeper insight in the spd .
99 d. mller et al . , fortschr .
42 ( 1994 ) 101 .
x. ji , phys .
d 55 ( 1997 ) 7114 ; a.v .
radyushkin , phys .
b 380 ( 1997 ) 417 ; j.c .
collins , l. frankfurt , m. strikman , phys .
d 56 ( 1997 ) 2982 .
saul ( for zeus collaboration ) , prompt photon production and deeply virtual compton scattering , talk at eps99 , tampere , finland ( july , 1999 ) .
radyushkin , phys .
d 56 ( 1997 ) 5524 ; j.c .
collins , a. freund , phys .
d 59 ( 1999 ) 074009 ; x. ji , j. osborne , phys . rev .
d 58 ( 1998 ) 094018 . s.a .
anikin , o.i .
zavialov , ann .
( 1978 ) 135 ; b. geyer et al .
, z. phys .
c 26 ( 1985 ) 591 ; i.i .
balitsky , v.m .
braun , nucl .
b 311 ( 1989 ) 541 .
d. mller , phys . rev .
d 49 ( 1994 ) 2525 ; a.v .
belitsky , d. mller , nucl .
b 527 ( 1998 ) 207 , nucl . phys .
b 537 ( 1999 ) 397 .
p. kroll , m. schrmann , p.a.m .
guichon , nucl .
phys . a 598 ( 1996 ) 435 .
frankfurt , a. freund , m. strikman , phys .
d 58 ( 1998 ) 114001 ; p.m. guichon , m. vanderhaeghen , prog . part .
41 ( 1998 ) 125 ; a. freund , m. strikman , single spin asymmetry in dvcs , hep - ph/9906205 . s. ferrara , r. gatto , a.f .
grillo , phys .
b 36 ( 1971 ) 124 , phys .
d 5 ( 1972 ) 3102 .
d. mller , phys . rev .
d 58 ( 1998 ) 054005 ; a.v .
belitsky , d. mller , phys .
b 417 ( 1997 ) 129 .
i.v . musatov and a.v .
radyushkin , evolution and models for skewed parton distributions , hep - ph/9905376 .
belitsky , et al .
b 437 ( 1998 ) 160 , nucl . phys .
b 546 ( 1999 ) 279 . a.d .
martin , r.g .
roberts , w.j .
stirling , phys .
d 47 ( 1993 ) 867 .
m. glck , e. reya , a. vogt , eur .
j. c 5 ( 1998 ) 461 .
|
asymptotic freedom of qcd allows short distance quantities first principles factorization theorems cross sections for semi-)inclusive reactions predicted as of perturbative parton cross sections long distance parton distributions exclusive reactions two - photon reactions light - cone region diffractive processes amplitudes in hard - scattering amplitudes hadron distribution amplitudes skewed parton distributions ) distributions proposed @xcite popular vital rle for description reactions measurement hadron total angular momentum among constiutents study of spds central of hadronic physics access spds probe nucleon with virtual photon via process deeply virtual compton scattering dvcs ) first evidence experimental feasibility detect signal revealed by zeus collaboration @xcite factorization of collinear singularities proved twist - two level to all orders in coupling @xcite local version of ope converge in kinematical region problem overcome by non - local light - cone expansion light - ray operators @xcite from renormalization group equation of operators derive evolution equations for spdsreview approach to next - to - leading nlo ) calculation accomplished conformal symmetry map results from forward deep inelastic scattering to non - forward kinematics of dvcs one - loop addenda problems resolved by employing conformal ward identities constraints from algebra collinear conformal group virtual compton scattering vcs ) process on nucleon measured in reaction @xmath0 contamination from bethe - heitler ( bh ) process final photon radiated from lepton beam scattering amplitude square @xmath1 in cross section contains vcs bh interference term bh - amplitude real contraction of leptonic tensor with hadronic current dirac and pauli form factors known from parametrized by double dipole formulae disentangle content of hadronic tensor tensor defined by product of two electromagnetic currents result of parity invariance independent kinematical structures measuring cross section in different experiments negatively positively charged lepton beam un)polarized beam target structure of hadronic tensor explored in different kinematical regionsinterested in dvcs @xmath12 large @xmath13 small dvcs amplitude decreases increasing @xmath14 bh amplitude grows decreasing @xmath13 delicate task to extract vcs amplitude for large virtualities @xmath15 low @xmath13 from experimental data promising to look for asymmetries measure interference term access to real imaginary dvcs amplitude @xmath16 lepton - beam nucleon polarized @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 azimuthal angle of final nucleon describe two - photon processes light - cone dominated region generalize bjorken limit introduce scaling variables @xmath21 @xmath22 related to bjorken variable @xmath23 @xmath24 skewedness parameter interpolates between processes table [ tab - kinlcd ] value scaling variable @xmath24 for two - photon processes dvcs longitudinal part hadronic tensor vanishes two kinematical structures twist - two accuracy @xmath25 transverse part metric tensor @xmath26 @xmath27-tensor contracted with projection operators @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 appearing amplitudes calculated ope contrast dis larger local operators wilson coefficients contribute non - forward case appreciate conformal ope @xcite wilson coefficients fixed to normalization results dis conformal operators @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath34 components obtained by contraction with light - like vectors @xmath36 @xmath37 carry spin quantum number @xmath40 conformal spin @xmath41 conformal subtraction scheme mixing induced by trace anomaly proportional to @xmath42 @xmath43 anomalous dimension matrix @xmath44 normalization factor mixed channels same as dis dvcs kinematics cope local converge necessary resum local operators into light - ray ones definition for spds : @xmath45 momentum fractions of incoming parton @xmath46 @xmath47 form factor decomposition functions @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 for parity even odd sectors introduced by @xcite reconstruct coefficient functions in @xmath52 @xmath53 sum runs over quark species @xmath55 electrical charge @xmath56 convolution defined by @xmath57task achieved by manipulation cope flavour non - singlet case cast into form @xmath58 evolution kernel @xmath59 coefficient function @xmath60 diagonal conformal waves gegenbauer polynomials @xmath61 eigenvalues @xmath62 @xmath63 coincide with anomalous dimensions wilson coefficients appear in dis closed form function @xmath64 deduced in @xmath65 from sum @xmath66 conformal covariance in minimal subtraction ms scheme transformation rotates cs result - to minimal induced by conformal anomalies in ms scheme rotation matrix found by study conformal ward identities for green functions operator insertions calculating anomalous contributions via feynman rules off - diagonal piece anomalous dimension matrix to nlo induced by special conformal anomaly matrix @xmath67 first coefficient @xmath42-function @xmath68_ 3 remaining task to transform coefficient functions to ms scheme solved in @xcite dvcs analytical continuation of hard - scattering amplitudes for meson production by two photon - collisionaxial - vector channel @xmath69\nonumber{g}^{a(1 ) \frac{n_f}{2 }\left\frac{1}{1 - t^2 }{\ln{1 - t{2}}{(1 + t)^2 }{1 - t{2{\ln^2{1 - t}{2}}{2(1 + t)^2 }\nonumber\end{aligned} different proposals modeling spd equating spd forward parton distributions proposal radyushkin double distribution functions @xmath70 profile function @xmath71 quarks gluons @xmath72 2 - z_-^2 1 - |z_+|]^3 }{g}\\pi } z_-, z_+ ) = \frac{15}{16 } 1 - |z_+|]^2 - z_-^2 ^2}{[1 - |z_+|]^5} spd obtained integration @xmath73 apply dd model different scales evolve spd expand @xmath74 legendre polynomials expansion coefficients @xmath75 conformal moments evolution governed anomalous dimension matrixmethod suited for small @xmath24 fig . input distributions at @xmath76 relative nlo corrections due to evolution not large input scale 0.7 gev nlo corrections not exceed 10% to 30% @xcite numerical estimation hard - scattering amplitudes expansion legendre polynomials evolution effects method not appropriate low @xmath77 region nlo corrections @xmath78 20 - 50% fig special cases can larger partial cancellation perturbative corrections ratio real to imaginary part ratio model dependent measurement deeper insight spd mller et al . fortschr . 42 ( 1994 ) 101 x. ji phys . d 55 ( 1997 ) 7114 radyushkin phys 380 ( 1997 ) 417 collins l frankfurt phys. 56 ( 1997 ) 2982 saul zeus collaboration prompt photon production virtual compton scattering talk eps99 tampere finland july 1999 ) radyushkin phys . d 56 ( 1997 ) 5524 collins freund phys . 59 ( 1999 ) 074009 x. ji j. osborne phys . rev58 ( 1998 ) 094018 anikin zavialov 1978 ) 135 geyer phys . 26 ( 1985 ) 591 balitsky braun nucl 311 ( 1989 ) 541 mller 49 ( 1994 ) 2525 belitsky mller 527 ( 1998 ) 207 phys 537 ( 1999 ) 397 kroll schrmann guichon 598 ( 1996 ) 435 frankfurt freund 58 ( 1998 ) 114001 guichon vanderhaeghen 41 ( 1998 ) 125 freund single spin asymmetry dvcs hep - ph/9906205 gatto grillo phys 36 ( 1971 ) 124 d 5 ( 1972 ) 3102 mller 58 ( 1998 ) 054005 belitsky mller phys 417 ( 1997 ) 129 musatov radyushkin evolution models skewed parton distributions hep - ph/9905376 belitsky 437 ( 1998 ) 160 546 ( 1999 ) 279 martin robertsstirling 47 1993 ) 867 glck reya vogt eur 5 1998 ) 461
| 0.565016
| 3,497
| 1,790
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,756
|
in this research we describe effective hamiltonian theory and apply this theory to the calculation of current - current @xmath0 and qcd penguin @xmath1 decay rates we calculate the decay rates of semileptonic and hadronic of charm quark in effective hamiltonian theory .
we investigate the decay rates of * d meson decays * according to * spectator quark model(sqm ) * for the calculation of * d * meson decays .
we obtain the total decay rates of semileptonic and hadronic of charm quark in effective hamiltonian according to colour favoured ( c - f ) and colour suppressed ( c - s ) , and then to added amplitude of processes colour favoured and colour suppressed ( f - s ) and obtain the decay rates of them .
|
the effective hamiltonian with qcd effects + @xmath2 is given by @xmath3 the operators @xmath4 can be grouped into two categories @xcite,@xcite : i=1,2-current - current operators;@xmath5 denotes the relevant ckm factors that are : @xmath6 we should take the variable@xmath7and@xmath8,or x and y as , @xmath9the partial decay rate in the c rest frame is,@xmath10 here @xmath11 @xmath12
@xmath13 @xmath14@xmath15 @xmath16^{1/2},h_{yc}=[1-(y^{2}/(y^{2}+c^{2}))]^{1/2},\]]@xmath17^{1/2 } , h_{ya}=[1-(y^{2}/(y^{2}+a^{2}))]^{1/2},\]]@xmath18@xmath19@xmath20 @xmath21@xmath22@xmath22
in the spectator model @xcite the spectator quark is given a non - zero momentum having in this work a gaussian distribution , represented by a free ( but adjustable ) parameter,@xmath23 @xmath24 the total meson decay rate through a particular mode is then assumed to be @xmath25 equal to the initiating decay rate .
we have @xmath26 here@xmath27@xmath28@xmath29 the integration range is restricted by @xmath30.we call this mode of quark and antiquark combination ( colour favoured ) .
it is also possible that the spectator antiquark combines with the quark@xmath31,for which we get @xmath32@xmath33 we call this * process(c - s ) * ( colour suppressed ) .
summing , the decay rates of b mesons for * process(c - f ) * and * process(c - s ) * are : @xmath34 @xmath35 where @xmath36 and so on .
the differential decay rates for two boson system in the spectator quark model for current - current plus penguin operators in the effective hamiltonian is given by , @xmath37@xmath38 where @xmath39 + the integration region is restricted by the condition @xmath40,thus @xmath41 where @xmath42^{2}-(q_{si}/m_{c})^{2}+\]]@xmath43 @xmath44 where @xmath45^{2}-(q_{si}/m_{c})^{2}+\]]@xmath46 therefore using eq.(6 - 11 ) the phase space parameters will be defined by , @xmath47@xmath48 now , we can integrate over the two mass cuts ( two boson systems ) , and obtain the hadronic decay rates as follows , @xmath49@xmath50@xmath51
now we want to calculate the decay rates of effective hamiltonian @xmath52 for f+s at quark - level and spectator model .
the effective hamiltonian for f+s , is given by @xmath53 where@xmath54is defined by equations mentioned during in the last page , so we can obtain @xmath55.the decay rates of current - current plus penguin for f+s is given by , @xmath56 @xmath57,\ ] ] @xmath58,\ ] ] @xmath59.\ ] ]
we use the standard particle data group @xcite parameterization of the ckm matrix . following ali and greub
@xcite we treat internal quark masses in tree - level loops with the values ( gev)@xmath60and @xmath61.following g.buccella @xcite we choose the effective wilson coefficients @xmath62for the various @xmath63 transitions.we have used in spectator quark model the value@xmath64@xcite.for the maximum mass of the quark - antiquark systems @xmath65we take a value midway between the lowest mass@xmath66state and the next most massive meson .
the decay rates of c quark for effective hamiltonian and effective hamiltonian of f+s shown in the table.1 . also the decay rates of c quark for f+s is given by @xmath67@xmath68 @xmath69@xmath70 @xmath71@xmath72
we used effective hamiltonian theory and spectator quark model for c quark and calculated hadronic decays of d mesons . in this model we added decays of channel hadronic decays of d mesons .
for colour favoured and suppressed we consider the channel @xmath73and achieved theoretical values very close to experimental ones .
finally it has been shown the case , in which the theoretical values are better than the amplitude of all the decay rates have been calculated . in table 1 ( below ) it must be noted that columns 2 and 4 have to be multiplied by @xmath74and columns 3 and 5 should be multiplied by @xmath75 .
[ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] +
99 a. j. buras , nucl instrum meth . a368 ( 1995 )
|
effective hamiltonian qcd effects @xmath2 @xmath3 operators @xmath4 grouped two categories @xcite i=1,2-current operators@xmath5 relevant ckm factors @xmath6 variable@xmath7and@xmath8 x y partial decay rate c rest frame@xmath10 @xmath11{yc}=[1-(y^{2}/(y^{2}+c^{2})){1/2}@xmath17 h{ya}=[1-(y^{2}/(y^{2}+a^{2}))^{1/2}@xmath18@xmath19 spectator model quark non - zero momentum gaussian distribution free adjustable parameter@xmath23 @xmath24 total meson decay rate equal initiating decay rate @xmath26@xmath27 integration range restricted @xmath30 quark antiquark combination colour favoured spectator antiquark combines quark@xmath31 @xmath32@xmath33 process(c - s ) * colour suppressed ) decay rates mesons process(c - f )(c - s ) @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36differential decay rates two boson system spectator quark model current - current penguin operators effective hamiltonian @xmath37 @xmath39 integration region restricted condition @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42-(q eq.(6 - 11 ) phase space parameters defined @xmath47@xmath48 integrate two mass cuts systems obtain hadronic decay rates @xmath49@xmath50@xmath51 calculate decay rates effective hamiltonian @xmath52 f+s quark - level spectator model effective hamiltonian f+s @xmath53 defined equations @xmath55 decay rates current - current penguin f+s @xmath56 @xmath57 standard particle data group @xcite parameterization ckm matrix treat internal quark masses tree - level loops values@xmath60and @xmath61 choose effective wilson coefficients @xmath62for @xmath63 transitions used spectator quark model value@xmath64 maximum mass quark - antiquark systems value midway lowest mass@xmath66state next most massive mesondecay rates c quark effective hamiltonian f+s table.1 decay rates c quark f+s given @xmath67 used effective hamiltonian theory spectator quark model c quark calculated hadronic decays d mesons added decays channel hadronic decays d mesons colour suppressed channel @xmath73and achieved theoretical values close experimental theoretical values better amplitude decay rates calculated table 1 columns 2 4 multiplied @xmath74and columns 3 5 multiplied @xmath75 cols=" 99 a. j. buras nucl instrum meth . a368 1995 )
| 0.181239
| 1,131
| 580
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,758
|
for a general nonabelian group action and an arbitrary genus worldsheet we show that vafa s old definition of discrete torsion coincides with douglas s d - brane definition of discrete torsion associated to projective representations . 0
|
discrete torsion was introduced many years ago by vafa in @xcite .
more recently douglas @xcite introduced an alternative picture in terms of d - branes .
the purpose of this note is to show the equivalence of these pictures . since both of these papers were very brief as regards to the general case we will review both constructions here . in general
a worldsheet @xmath0 of genus @xmath1 and no boundary will be associated to a given phase dictated by the @xmath2-field and the homology class of the worldsheet in the target space .
vafa wanted to generalize this notion of a @xmath2-field to the case of orbifolds with fixed points . in order to localize the picture
let us consider a discrete group @xmath3 acting on @xmath4 where the origin is fixed by all of @xmath3 .
the worldsheet @xmath0 on this orbifold may be pictured as a disk in the covering @xmath4 where the edges of the disk are identified by elements of the action of @xmath3 .
that is , the usual homology 1-cycles of the worldsheet @xmath0 are twisted by elements of @xmath3 .
the twisting of these cycles in @xmath0 may be viewed as a @xmath3-bundle on @xmath0 .
the holonomy of this bundle is given precisely by the twist associated to a given loop .
since @xmath3 is a discrete group , this bundle is flat .
such a bundle is classified by the homotopy class of a mapping @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the classifying space for the group @xmath3 .
that is , @xmath7 and @xmath8 for @xmath9 .
in this way , @xmath6 in the case of an orbifold plays a rather similar role to the target space of the usual string theory .
vafa s idea was to define the discrete torsion version of the @xmath2-field as @xmath10 because of this analogy .
the connection between the @xmath2-field and group cohomology has been clarified recently by the work of sharpe @xcite .
now group ( co)homology , which is defined as the ( co)homology of @xmath6 , can be described algebraically directly in terms of @xmath3 as we now show . in order to complete the description of discrete torsion we need to describe the above picture in terms of this more intrinsic definition .
let @xmath11 be the _ group ring _ of @xmath3 .
that is , any element of @xmath11 may be written uniquely as @xmath12 for @xmath13 .
now let @xmath14 be a free resolution of @xmath15 as a @xmath11-module .
this is an exact sequence of @xmath11-modules where @xmath16 is a free @xmath11-module for any @xmath17 .
the @xmath3-action on @xmath15 is taken to be trivial .
now define @xmath18 as the @xmath3-coinvariant projection of @xmath16 .
that is , we divide @xmath16 by the equivalence @xmath19 for any @xmath20 . since @xmath16 is a free @xmath11-module , @xmath18 will be a free @xmath15-module , i.e. , a free abelian group .
the homology of the induced complex @xmath21 is then equal to @xmath22 , the homology of @xmath3 .
see section ii.4 of @xcite , for example , for a proof that this equals @xmath23 .
one way to explicitly compute @xmath22 is via the `` bar resolution '' as follows .
let @xmath16 be generated by @xmath24-tuples of the form @xmath25 where the @xmath3-action is defined as @xmath26 the boundary map @xmath27 is defined as @xmath28 where the hat indicates omission as usual . because of the @xmath3-action , we may use @xmath29 as a basis for @xmath16 or @xmath18 .
the `` bar '' notation is to write @xmath30 = ( 1,g_1,g_1g_2,\ldots , g_1g_2\cdots g_n).\ ] ] we will generally consider the homology of @xmath3 in terms of the generators @xmath31 $ ] .
one may show that a generator may be considered trivial if any of the entries @xmath32 are equal to 1 .
it is also useful to note the explicit form of the boundary map in ( [ eq : free ] ) of a 3-chain in the bar notation : @xmath33 = [ b|c]-[ab|c]+[a|bc]-[a|b ] .
\label{eq:3c}\ ] ] so how is the homology class of @xmath0 in @xmath6 described in terms of these bar chains ?
the free resolution ( [ eq : zgfree ] ) is actually an augmented simplicial chain complex , @xmath34 , as follows .
let the elements of @xmath3 be viewed as the vertices of @xmath34 .
now let @xmath25 be the @xmath17-dimensional simplex in @xmath34 with the corresponding vertices .
thus we have exactly one simplex in @xmath34 for every possible sequence of group elements .
the group @xmath3 acts on @xmath34 to give the complex ( [ eq : free ] ) as a quotient .
as far as homology is concerned , the abstract simplicial complex @xmath35 is a perfectly good representative for @xmath6 .
we may now take a simplicial decomposition of @xmath0 and explicitly map it into this simplicial picture of @xmath6 .
this will relate the homology of @xmath0 , and in particular its fundamental class , to the homology of @xmath3 . as a simple example let us consider a torus as shown in figure [ fig : torus ] .
this torus consists of one cycle twisted by the action of @xmath36 and another cycle twisted by the action of @xmath37 .
the topology of the torus dictates that @xmath38 .
the figure shows the labels of the vertices in terms of the group action and it also shows a simple simplicial decomposition .
we are free to label one vertex as `` 1 '' . in terms of the image of this torus in our peculiar simplicial model of @xmath6
we see that @xmath39 corresponds to a simplex @xmath40 and @xmath41 corresponds to a simplex @xmath42 . as usual in simplicial homology one needs to be careful about relative signs .
the fundamental class of @xmath0 is given by @xmath43 so that the diagonal line in figure [ fig : torus ] cancels for the boundary of @xmath43 .
this gives @xmath44 & = ( 1,a , ab)-(1,b , ab)\\ & = [ a|b]-[b|a ] , \label{eq : g1 } \end{split}\ ] ] in terms of the bar chains .
applying @xmath45 to this bar resolution we may go over to the group cohomology picture .
a group @xmath17-cochain can now be viewed as a map from @xmath46 to @xmath47 .
for example , if @xmath48 then @xmath49 for @xmath50 . from ( [ eq:3c ] )
we see that a 2-cochain is closed if @xmath51 if discrete torsion is written in terms of the @xmath52 cocycles then ( [ eq : g1 ] ) is translated in vafa s language into the statement that the phase associated to a genus one riemann surface is given by @xmath53 this is the result quoted in @xcite .
this method may be applied equally well to higher genus worldsheets .
the genus two case is shown in figure [ fig : g2 ] together with a specific simplicial decomposition .
it follows that @xmath54 = [ a_1|b_1]-[\gamma|b_1a_1]-[b_1|a_1]+[a_2|b_2 ] + [ \gamma|a_2b_2]-[b_2|a_2],\ ] ] where @xmath55 , which by the topology of a genus two surface must equal @xmath56 .
note that if @xmath57 , which would happen if @xmath3 were abelian for example , then the genus two homology class simply breaks into @xmath58-[b_1|a_1])+([a_2|b_2]-[b_2|a_2])$ ] which is the sum of two genus one classes .
this does _ not _ happen in general if @xmath59 .
one may view this statement in terms of a genus two surface degenerating into two genus one surfaces touching at a point .
such a degeneration is topologically obstructed if @xmath59 .
there are many ways of performing a simplicial decomposition of @xmath0 in general .
one may show that changing the decomposition will simply change @xmath60 $ ] in the computations above by the boundary of a group 3-chain and hence has no effect .
in @xcite douglas introduced another definition of discrete torsion associated to projective representations which we now review .
see @xcite for further discussion of this construction . consider the following central extension of @xmath3 : @xmath61 where @xmath62 is a set - theoretic map such that @xmath63 is the identity on @xmath3 .
such extensions are classified by @xmath64 .
the map @xmath62 defines a projective representation of @xmath3 .
given @xmath48 written in terms of the bar resolution of the previous section one may show that @xcite @xmath65 douglas considered @xmath62 as a lift of an orbifold action to the chan - paton factors on the end of an open string .
he then considered a riemann surface with a disk removed .
such a surface can represent either a multi - loop open string diagram or a multi - loop tadpole - like diagram for a closed string .
consider the genus two case shown in figure [ fig:2a ] .
when computing the amplitude of this diagram in the open string context one must include a trace of the group actions on the chan - paton elements along the boundary . as is clear from the figure , this boundary may be contracted to the outer polygon which is a sequence of 1-cycles which are twisted by elements of @xmath3 .
let @xmath66 be this weighting of the amplitude .
we then have @xmath67 where @xmath68 represent the associated twists . for a general genus @xmath1 surface
we clearly have @xmath69 let @xmath70 .
then the topology of the surface dictates that @xmath71 .
note that @xmath72 and thus @xmath73 .
it follows that @xmath74 .
repeated use of ( [ eq : proj ] ) and ( [ eq : coc2 ] ) then gives . the case @xmath75 is left as an easy exercise for the reader . ]
@xmath76 where @xmath77 .
this formula was also derived in @xcite .
now it is not hard to see that the final form of ( [ eq : big ] ) corresponds to a simplicial decomposition of a genus @xmath1 surface into @xmath78 triangles in the language of section [ s : vafa ] .
each @xmath52 factor represents one triangle oriented in just the right way to build up the complete surface .
we show the four triangles for a generic pair @xmath79 in figure [ fig : gen ] .
this factor @xmath80 is exactly the same factor as we obtain by vafa s method of the previous section applied to this simplicial decomposition .
thus we see that vafa s and douglas s definition of discrete torsion agree in general .
it is a pleasure to thank s. katz , r. plesser and e. sharpe for useful conversations .
the author is supported in part by nsf grant dms-0074072 and a research fellowship from the alfred p. sloan foundation .
|
discrete torsion introduced by vafa in @xcite recently douglas @xcite introduced alternative picture d - branes note show equivalence of pictures papers brief review constructions worldsheet @xmath0 of genus @xmath1 no boundary associated to phase by @xmath2-field homology class in target space vafa @xmath2-field to orbifolds with fixed points consider discrete group @xmath3 acting on @xmath4 origin fixed by @xmath3 worldsheet @xmath0 on orbifold pictured as disk covering @xmath4 edges identified by elements action @xmath3 homology 1-cycles of twisted by elements @xmath3 twisting as @xmath3-bundle on @xmath0 holonomy given by twist loop @xmath3 discrete group bundle is flat classified by homotopy class of mapping @xmath5 @xmath6 classifying space for group @xmath3 @xmath7 @xmath8 for @xmath9 @xmath6 orbifold similar role to target space of string theory vafa s idea define discrete torsion version of @xmath2-field as @xmath10 analogyconnection between @xmath2-field group cohomology clarified by sharpe @xcite group co)homology @xmath6 described @xmath3 discrete torsion intrinsic definition @xmath11 group ring of @xmath3 element @xmath11 written as @xmath12 for @xmath13 @xmath14 free resolution of @xmath15 @xmath11-module sequence-modules @xmath16 free @xmath11-module for @xmath17 @xmath3-action on @xmath15 trivial define @xmath18 as @xmath3-coinvariant projection of @xmath16 divide @xmath16 by equivalence @xmath19 for @xmath20 @xmath16 free @xmath11-module @xmath18 free @xmath15-module group homology of induced complex @xmath21 equal to @xmath22 homology @xmath3 see section ii.4 of @xcite for proof @xmath23 compute @xmath22 via bar resolution @xmath16 generated by @xmath24-tuples @xmath25 @xmath3-action defined as @xmath26 boundary map @xmath27 defined as @xmath28 hat indicates omission@xmath3-action use @xmath29 basis for @xmath16 or @xmath18 bar notation @xmath30 = ( 1,g_1,g_1g_2,\ldots , g_1g_2\cdots g_n). consider homology of @xmath3 generators @xmath31 generator trivial if entries @xmath32 equal to 1 explicit form boundary map 3-chain bar notation @xmath33 = [ b|c]-[ab|c]+[a|bc]-[a|b ] homology class of @xmath0 in @xmath6 described bar chains ? free resolution zgfree augmented simplicial chain complex @xmath34 elements of @xmath3 vertices of @xmath34 @xmath25 be @xmath17-dimensional simplex in @xmath34 with corresponding vertices one simplex in @xmath34 for every sequence group elements group @xmath3 acts on @xmath34 complex free quotient abstract simplicial complex @xmath35 good representative for @xmath6 simplicial decomposition of @xmath0 map into simplicial picture @xmath6 homology of @xmath0 fundamental class to homology @xmath3 consider torus in figuretorus one cycle twisted by @xmath36 another by @xmath37 topology dictates @xmath38 figure shows labels vertices group action simple simplicial decomposition label one vertex as `` 1 '' @xmath39 corresponds to @xmath40 @xmath41 to @xmath42 careful about relative signs fundamental class of @xmath0 by @xmath43 diagonal line cancels for boundary of @xmath43 gives @xmath44 & = ( 1,a , ab)-(1,b , ab)\\ = [ a|b]-[b|a ] bar chains applying @xmath45 to bar resolution group cohomology picture group @xmath17-cochain viewed as map from @xmath46 to @xmath47 if @xmath48 @xmath49 for @xmath50 2-cochain closed if @xmath51 discrete torsion written in @xmath52 cocycles eq g1 translated into phase associated to genus one riemann surface given by @xmath53 result quoted in @xcite method to higher genus worldsheets genus two case shown in figure fig g2 specific simplicial decomposition@xmath54 = [ a_1|b_1]-[\gamma|b_1a_1]-[b_1|a_1]+[a_2|b_2 ] + [ \gamma|a_2b_2]-[b_2|a_2] @xmath55 equal @xmath56 if @xmath57 abelian genus two homology class breaks into @xmath58-[b_1|a_1])+([a_2|b_2]-[b_2|a_2]) sum of two genus one classes @xmath59 genus two surface degenerating into two genus one surfaces degeneration topologically obstructed if @xmath59 decomposition of @xmath0 changing decomposition @xmath60 group 3-chain no effect @xcite douglas introduced definition of discrete torsion projective representations @xcite central extension @xmath3 : @xmath61 @xmath62 set - theoretic map @xmath63 identity on @xmath3 extensions classified by @xmath64 @xmath62 defines projective representation of @xmath3 @xmath48 bar resolution considered @xmath62 as lift of orbifold action to chan - paton factors open string riemann surface with disk removedsurface multi - loop open string or tadpole closed string consider genus two case figure fig:2a computing amplitude open string include group actions on chan - paton elements along boundary boundary contracted to outer polygon 1-cycles twisted by elements @xmath3 @xmath66 weighting amplitude @xmath67 @xmath68 represent twists general genus @xmath1 surface @xmath69 @xmath70 topology dictates @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 use ( [ eq : proj ] ) [ eq : coc2 ] ) case @xmath75 left easy exercise reader @xmath76 @xmath77 formula derived in @xcite final form of ( [ eq : big ] ) corresponds simplicial decomposition of genus @xmath1 surface into @xmath78 triangles vafa each @xmath52 factor represents one triangle surface four triangles for generic pair @xmath79 in figure factor @xmath80 same factor vafa s method simplicial decomposition vafa s douglas s definition of discrete torsion agree thank s. katz r. plesser e. sharpe for conversationsauthor supported nsf grant research fellowship alfred p sloan foundation
| 0.42897
| 2,721
| 1,499
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,762
|
the changes in the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) spectrum seen as an increase of temperature due to a strong magnetic field are determined and their influence on the polarization of the radiation is exhibited .
the effect is due to the coupling of the cmb photons to the magnetic field in the qed vacuum via the interaction with virtual pairs . in spite of the fact that the distortion of the cmb spectrum for magnetic fields that exist in the vicinity of magnetars is quite large ,
this effect is very difficult to detect at present because the required angular resolutions is not yet available .
|
the most fascinating explanation of recent observations of the polarization of the cmb radiation @xcite is the hypothesis of primordial gravitational waves .
however , there are other sources of polarization - dependent deformations of the cmb spectrum that have been pointed out ( galactic dust @xcite and topological defects @xcite ) . in this paper
we explore a similar effect : the polarization - dependent distortion of the cmb spectrum in the presence of magnetic fields .
the coupling of the magnetic field to the cmb is due to the field - dependent qed vacuum polarization . in order to determine precisely this effect we quantize electromagnetic waves propagating on the magnetic background .
then we consider the properties of the thermal state of the quantized radiation . in our analysis
we shall use the results obtained previously in the classical theory @xcite .
our starting point is a relativistic lagrangian @xmath0 where @xmath1 and @xmath2 are the scalar and the pseudoscalar invariants of the electromagnetic field , @xmath3 we will employ the heisenberg - euler lagrangian @xmath4 derived in qed @xcite under the assumption that the electric and magnetic fields _ do not change _ in space and time , @xmath5,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath6 is the fine structure constant and @xmath7v / m is the characteristic value of the electric field built from the electron mass and the universal constants , called the critical field by heisenberg and euler .
the corresponding magnetic critical field is @xmath8 t .
the invariants @xmath1 and @xmath2 enter the lagrangian ( [ he ] ) through the expressions : @xmath9 the heisenberg - euler lagrangian can also be used for fields whose variation in space and time is slow on the characteristic quantum scale : @xmath10 m and @xmath11s .
we apply the theory based on this lagrangian to the description of the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) radiation in the presence of a magnetic field . following the procedure introduced in ref .
@xcite , we separate the electromagnetic field into a strong , constant magnetic field @xmath12 and a weak wave @xmath13 , @xmath14 next , we expand the lagrangian keeping only the quadratic terms in @xmath13 ( linear terms do not contribute to the equations of motion ) , @xmath15,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath16 these derivatives of the heisenberg - euler lagrangian are to be evaluated at @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
aiming at the quantization of the @xmath13 fields , we find it more convenient to use not the lagrangian but the hamiltonian formulation .
the classical hamiltonian expressed as a function of divergenceless canonical fields @xmath19 and @xmath20 has the form : @xmath21,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath22 is the projector on the direction of the magnetic field and @xmath23 the canonical evolution equations for @xmath24 and @xmath20 , obtained from the lagrangian @xmath25 , are : @xmath26 these equations have a complete set of solutions in the form of normalized monochromatic complex mode vectors .
each mode has the @xmath27 part and the @xmath28 part , @xmath29 where @xmath30 following adler @xcite , we called these modes parallel ( the @xmath20 field lies in the @xmath31-plane ) and perpendicular ( the @xmath20 field perpendicular to this plane ) .
the mode frequencies are given by the following formulas : @xmath32 where the two refractive indices are : @xmath33 and @xmath34 is the angle between the direction of propagation @xmath35 and the direction of the magnetic field .
the whole information about the nature of nonlinearity is contained in two functions of the magnitude of the magnetic field , @xmath36 and @xmath37 .
for the heisenberg - euler lagrangian these functions do not have a closed form ; they were evaluated numerically using _ mathematica _ @xcite .
note that the magnetic field has no effect on waves propagating along the field ( @xmath34=0 ) . in fig .
[ fig1 ] we show the changes @xmath38 and @xmath39 in the refractive indices as functions of the magnetic field @xmath40 when the effect is the largest ; the direction of the field is perpendicular to the direction of observation . in fig .
[ fig2 ] we show the variation of the refractive indices with the angle of observation for the critical magnetic field @xmath41 .
having found a complete set of modes , we can construct field operators as the following linear combinations of the annihilation and creation operators , @xmath42 where the index @xmath43 takes on the values @xmath44 and @xmath45 .
the standard commutation relations between the annihilation and creation operators , @xmath46=\delta_{\lambda\lambda'}\delta({\bm k}-{\bm k}'),\end{aligned}\ ] ] guarantee the correct canonical commutation relations between the field operators , @xmath47=i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}\partial_k\delta({\bm r}-{\bm r}').\end{aligned}\ ] ] these relations confirm that the fields @xmath24 and @xmath20 ( and not @xmath48 and @xmath20 ) form the canonically conjugate pair of fields @xcite .
their commutation relations are universal since they do not depend on the properties of the medium ( in our case the background magnetic field ) .
the substitution of the field operators into the formula ( [ ham ] ) gives the quantum energy operator , @xmath49
in the thermal state at the temperature @xmath50 the density matrix @xmath51 is an exponential function of the hamiltonian ( [ qham ] ) , @xmath52 in the presence of the magnetic field , the hamiltonian ( [ qham ] ) contains the modified frequencies ( [ freq ] ) .
the average density of the cmb photons per unit volume @xmath53 in the thermal state with the wave vector @xmath54 and polarization @xmath43 is : @xmath55 the influence of the magnetic field on the spectrum shows through the modification of the frequencies . since both refractive indices @xmath56 are greater than one , the spectrum of the cmb radiation looks like coming from regions of higher effective temperature @xmath57 .
an important characteristic feature of the spectrum is its dependence on the polarization ; the effective temperature for the perpendicular polarization is larger than the effective temperature for the parallel polarization .
the change in the temperature due to the change of the refractive index is quite large for strong magnetic field .
already for the critical field the increase in temperature is 2.4mk for the perpendicular mode and 0.9mk for the parallel mode .
these values exceed by far the standard deviations in the measurements of the cmb temperature
. the characteristic dependence of the observable temperature of the cmb radiation on polarization would be helpful in identifying regions where there exist very strong magnetic fields .
the strongest magnetic fields in the universe exist in the vicinity of magnetars @xcite .
unfortunately , the predicted distortion of the cmb spectrum by those fields can not be detected with the present observational means .
the problem lies in the smallness of the region where the magnetic field is strong , coupled with the large distance to the nearest magnetar .
one may hope that in the future the qed effects of strong magnetic fields will be accessible to observations due to improvements in angular resolution and in the precision of the measurements of temperature fluctuations in cmb . at present
one may hope to use the calculated effects of magnetic fields on the polarization only when the extension of regions with strong magnetic fields is much larger than that in the vicinity of magnetars .
we thank the anonymous referee for pointing out the difficulties in observing the effects predicted in this paper .
this research was financed by the polish national science center grant no .
2012/07/b / st1/03347 . 00
p. a. r. ade _ et .
lett . * 112 * , 241101 ( 2014 ) .
m. m. mortonson and u. seljak , j. cosmol .
. phys . * 10 * , 035 ( 2014 ) .
j. lizarraga _ et .
_ , phys.rev .
* 112 * , 171301 ( 2014 ) .
a. moss and l. pogosian , phys.rev .
112 * , 171302 ( 2014 ) .
z. bialynicka - birula and i. bialynicki - birula , phys .
d * 2 * , 2341 ( 1970 ) .
s. adler , ann .
( n.y . ) * 67 * , 599 ( 1971 ) .
w. heisenberg and h. euler , z. phys .
* 98 * , 714 ( 1936 ) .
wolfram research , inc .
, _ mathematica _ , version 9 , champaign , illinois , ( 2012 ) .
i. bialynicki - birula and z. bialynicka - birula , _ quantum electrodynamics _ ( pergamon , oxford , 1975 ) , chap . 9 .
s. a olausen and v. m. kaspi , astrophys . j. suppl . ser .
* 212 * , 6 ( 2014 ) .
|
fascinating explanation of polarization cmb radiation is hypothesis of primordial gravitational waves other sources of polarization deformations galactic dust topological defects paper explore effect polarization - dependent distortion of cmb spectrum in magnetic fields coupling magnetic field to cmb due to field - qed vacuum polarization quantize electromagnetic waves on magnetic background consider properties thermal state of quantized radiation use results in classical theory @xcite starting point is relativistic lagrangian @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2 are scalar pseudoscalar invariants of electromagnetic field heisenberg - euler lagrangian @xmath4 electric magnetic fields do not change in space time @xmath6 is fine structure constant @xmath7v characteristic value of electric field critical field by heisenberg euler magnetic critical field is @xmath8 t invariants @xmath1 and @xmath2 enter lagrangian through expressions @xmath9 heisenberg - euler lagrangian used for fields variation space time slow @xmath10 @xmath11s apply theory to description cosmic microwave background cmb radiation in magnetic field procedureseparate electromagnetic field into strong constant field @xmath12 weak wave @xmath13 @xmath14 expand lagrangian quadratic terms in @xmath13 linear terms contribute to equations motion @xmath15 @xmath16 derivatives of heisenberg - euler lagrangian evaluated at @xmath17 @xmath18 quantization @xmath13 fields convenient use lagrangian hamiltonian formulation classical hamiltonian function of divergenceless canonical fields @xmath19 @xmath20 form @xmath21 @xmath22 projector on direction magnetic field @xmath23 canonical evolution equations for @xmath24 @xmath20 from lagrangian @xmath25 @xmath26 equations solutions normalized monochromatic complex mode vectors each mode has @xmath27 @xmath28 part @xmath29 @xmath30 modes parallel field-plane perpendicular mode frequencies given by formulas @xmath32 refractive indices angle between direction propagation direction magnetic field information nonlinearity in two functions of magnitude magnetic field @xmath36 @xmath37 heisenberg - euler lagrangian functions closed form evaluated numerically using mathematica @xcitemagnetic field no effect on waves ( @xmath34=0 ) fig changes @xmath38 @xmath39 in refractive indices functions of magnetic field @xmath40 effect largest direction perpendicular to observation fig fig2 variation refractive indices with angle observation for critical magnetic field @xmath41 construct field operators as linear combinations of annihilation creation operators @xmath42 index @xmath43 takes values @xmath44 @xmath45 standard commutation relations between @xmath46=\delta_\lambda}\delta(\bm k- k} guarantee correct commutation relations operators @xmath47=i\hbar\epsilon_\partial_k\delta({\bm r}- r}'). confirm fields @xmath24 @xmath20 form conjugate pair fields commutation relations universal depend on properties medium background magnetic field substitution of field operators into formula gives quantum energy operator @xmath49 thermal state temperature @xmath50 density matrix @xmath51 exponential function of hamiltonian ( qham ) @xmath52 magnetic field hamiltonian ( contains modified frequenciesaverage density cmb photons per unit volume @xmath53 thermal state wave vector @xmath54 polarization @xmath43 is @xmath55 influence magnetic field on spectrum shows through modification frequencies refractive indices @xmath56 greater than one spectrum cmb radiation from higher effective temperature @xmath57 spectrum dependence on polarization effective temperature perpendicular polarization larger than parallel polarization change temperature due to refractive index large for strong magnetic field critical field increase temperature 2.4mk perpendicular 0.9mk parallel mode values exceed standard deviations measurements cmb temperature dependence observable temperature cmb radiation on polarization identifying regions strong magnetic fields strongest magnetic fields magnetars predicted distortion cmb spectrum fields detected observational means problem in smallness region magnetic field strong large distance to nearest magnetar future effects strong magnetic fields accessible due improvements angular resolution precision temperature fluctuations use calculated effects magnetic fields on polarization when extension of regions with strong magnetic fields larger than vicinity magnetars thank anonymous referee for difficulties observing effects paper research financed by polish national science center grant no 2012/07/b / st1/03347112 241101 2014 ) mortonson u. seljak cosmol phys . 10 035 ( 2014 ) lizarraga phys.rev 112 171301 2014 a moss l. pogosian phys.rev 112 171302 2014 z bialynicka - birula bialynicki - birula 2 2341 ( 1970 ) adler 67 599 ( 1971 ) w heisenberg h. euler. 98 714 ( 1936 ) wolfram research mathematica version 9 champaign illinois 2012 ) bialynicki - birula quantum electrodynamics pergamon oxford 1975 ) 9 olausen m. kaspi astrophys. suppl 212 * 6 ( 2014 )
| 0.316009
| 2,065
| 1,054
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,777
|
the distinction between the damping coefficient and the effective non - linear mobility of driven particles in active micro - rheology of supercooled liquids is explained in terms of individual and collective dynamics .
the effective mobility arises as a collective effect which gives insight into the energy landscape of the system . on the other hand ,
the damping coefficient is a constant that modulates the effect of external forces over the thermal energy which particles have at their disposition to perform brownian motion . for long times , these thermal fluctuations become characterized in terms of an effective temperature that is a consequence of the dynamic coupling between kinetic and configurational degrees of freedom induced by the presence of the strong external force .
the interplay between collective mobility and effective temperature allows to formulate a generalized stokes - einstein relation that may be used to determine the collective diffusion coefficient .
the explicit relations we deduce reproduce simulation data remarkably well .
|
it was recently shown that a non - equilibrated energy transfer between kinetic and configuration degrees of freedom lies at the origin of a breakdown of the classical stokes - einstein relation in suspensions of particles at arbitrary concentrations @xcite .
this breakdown is quantified in terms of an effective temperature , @xmath0 , that depends on the local confining forces that a tracer particle experiences during its motion through the fluid @xcite . when a constant external force , @xmath1 , is applied on the particles ,
the coupling between configuration and kinetic degrees of freedom is stronger and , consequently , the corresponding effective temperature contains the effect of this external force , @xmath2 , @xcite .
a similar effect has been recently reported in simulations on active non - linear microrheology of supercooled liquids in refs .
@xcite in which the correspondence between simulation results and theory is remarkable , see , for instance , ref .
it is convenient to notice that , although the methodology adopted in ref.@xcite , where the authors use the potential energy landscape concept , differs notably from that of refs .
@xcite , in which correlation functions of dynamic variables are analyzed , the same effect associated with thermal fluctuations and the effective temperature appears .
we will back to this point below .
if @xmath3 is the probability density in @xmath4space , with @xmath5 and @xmath6 the position and velocity of a driven particle , then the heart of the statistical description of this problem is that for systems in or near an arrested state , like concentrated particle suspensions and supercooled liquids , the assumption of adiabatic decoupling @xmath7 _ is no longer valid _ , and therefore we have to use the exact definition @xmath8 which means that the different time scales of the dynamics are not well separated .
this simple fact has huge implications on the scaling of the effective temperature and mobility of glasses and glass like systems . in this work ,
we discuss these implications . in doing this , we provide a theoretical and conceptual framework that serves to understand , on the basis of a non - equilibrium description based on fokker - planck and smoluchowski equations , the origin of the already mentioned effective temperature and mobility , as well as to formulate a generalized version of the fluctuation - dissipation theorem in terms of the stokes - einstein relation , valid for far from equilibrium systems under the action of an external force .
we illustrate our results by considering an ensemble of tracer particles in non - linear microrheology in atomic glasses . the article is organized as follows . in section
ii we explain the physics behind the non - adiabatic decoupling of the fokker - planck description .
then , insection iii we show the origin of the force dependent temperature whereas section iv is devoted to show the origin of the effective mobility within the mean field description .
finally , section v discusses the generalization of the stokes - einstein relation and the summary and conclusions are presented in section vi .
in order to proceed , it is convenient to introduce the well - known kramers - fokker - planck equation @xmath9 which describes the dynamics of an ensemble of non - interacting brownian degrees of freedom , that is , the velocity @xmath6 and the position @xmath5 of the driven particles in contact with a heat bath . in eq .
( [ fokker - planck ] ) @xmath10 stands for the specific energy landscape , @xmath11 the mass of the driven particles , @xmath12 is the temperature of the heat bath and @xmath13 the boltzmann s constant .
it is convenient to stress that @xmath14 is known as the damping coefficient ( friction per unit of mass ) of a single particle which may differ , in the general case , from the effective friction coefficient @xmath15 of the ensemble , with @xmath16 the mobility .
our aim is to calculate the explicit expression of @xmath17 .
usually , this is done starting from the constrained description in terms of the reduced density @xmath18.@xcite note here that , the normalization of the probability is expressed by @xmath19 the configurational probability density evolves according to@xmath20 . % \ ] ] equation ( [ configurational probability ] ) has been obtained by partial integration of eq .
( [ fokker - planck ] ) over velocity and thus , implicitly defines the current @xmath21 . for times
@xmath22 , the constitutive relation for @xmath23 can be obtained by taking the time derivative of @xmath24 , using eq .
( [ fokker - planck ] ) and integrating by parts assuming that the currents vanish at the boundaries .
thus , after neglecting the time derivative @xmath25 , the resulting expression is @xmath26 - \beta^{-1 } \rho \nabla v.\ ] ] large external forces cause local inhomogeneities in the system in such a way that there is no clear time separation between the relaxation of the fast and the slow ( configuration ) variables , a situation which corresponds to the underdamped motion of the driven particles . in these conditions , @xmath27 is not given by a maxwellian and thus , according to the equipartition theorem , the second moment of @xmath27 yields a nonequilibrium temperature @xmath28 @xmath29 since it is not possible to know a _
priori _ the explicit dependencies of @xmath27 , it is convenient to make an overall estimate of this effective temperature . defining @xmath30 and using eq .
( [ fokker - planck ] ) , we obtain the modified rayleigh equation @xmath31 + \frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left [ \phi \langle\nabla v\rangle\right ] , \ ] ] where we have introduced the volume averaged specific force : @xmath32 . the rayleigh equation ( [ rayleigh ] ) is valid up to zero order in the expansion @xmath33 where @xmath34 is a characteristic length of the system .
( [ rayleigh ] ) describes the relaxation of the spatially - averaged distribution @xmath35 and , as a consequence of this , it includes , over average , the effect of the external forces on the dynamics of the fast variable through the _ time dependent quantity _ @xmath36 .
the solution of eq . ( [ rayleigh ] ) can be found by using the method of characteristics .
thus , in the absence of diffusion , the velocity @xmath6 is determined by the initial velocity @xmath37 through the relation @xmath38 a change of variables from @xmath6 to @xmath39 transforms eq .
( [ rayleigh ] ) into @xmath40 a second change , @xmath41 @xmath42 leads to@xmath43 whose solution is a gaussian@xcite that , written in the original variables , reads @xmath44 @xmath45 ^{2}}{\frac{2k_{b}t_{0}}{m}\left ( 1-e^{-2\beta t}\right ) } \right\}\ ] ] at long time the dependence of @xmath35 on @xmath37 disappears , and if @xmath36 is a slow varying function of is argument such that@xmath46 then the long time _ quasi - stationary _ limit of eq .
( [ gaussian ] ) becomes@xmath47 ^{2}}{\frac{2k_{b}t_{0}% } { m}}\right\}.\ ] ] the second moment of eq .
( [ gaussian3 ] ) is then given by @xmath48^{2}\equiv \frac{k_{b}t_{eff}(t)}{m}.\ ] ] this equation is the spatial average of the nonequilibrium temperature @xmath28 introduced in eq .
( [ nonequilibrium temperature ] ) : @xmath49 .
it is worth emphasizing that eq .
( [ second moment ] ) contains the damping coefficient @xmath14 in a form that weighs the corrective effect that external forces induce on the thermal energy that particles have at their disposal in order to perform brownian motion .
this extra energy comes from the non - equilibrated energy distribution associated to velocities.@xcite thus , eq .
( [ second moment ] ) can be interpreted as an equipartition theorem defining the thermal energy of the system that is proportional to the non - equilibrium mean - field effective temperature @xmath0 .
when the specific potential energy is of the form @xmath50 , due to the application of an external force @xmath1 , eq .
( [ second moment ] ) reduces to @xmath51 in the literature reporting simulations on nonlinear - active microrheology , different strategies were used to introduce the effective temperature similar to eq .
( [ meanfield temperature ] ) .
for instance in refs .
@xcite , the authors inferred its existence by analyzing the behavior of the mean square displacement and the diffusion coefficient in terms of the externally applied force .
more recently , in ref .
@xcite the potential energy landscape approach was used in order to calculate the population distribution of different metabasin energies in the presence of the external force .
it was shown that the energy distribution of the system maintains a gaussian form but becomes shifted towards higher energies , fact that yield the authors to characterize the effect in terms of an effective temperature whose dependence on the force coincides with eq .
( [ meanfield temperature ] ) .
adopting now a mean - field description by using @xmath2 in the first term at the right hand side of eq .
( [ constituttive ] ) yields @xmath52 , % \ ] ] which , after substituted into eq .
( [ configurational probability ] ) , yields the _ mean - field smoluchowski equation _ @xmath53\right\ } , \ ] ] where we have introduced the mean - field ( self ) diffusion coefficient @xmath54 where we have introduced the bare mobility coefficient @xmath55 that depends on the damping coefficient @xmath14 .
the calculation of the effective mobility coefficient can now be done as follows .
first , we define the local velocity @xmath56 as @xmath57 such that @xmath58 and according to eq .
( [ diffusion current ] ) , see refs .
@xcite , @xmath59}dx , % \ ] ] where the characteristic length of a cage @xmath34 , coincides with the periodicity of the potential energy @xmath60 . in first approximation
, we may substitute the stationary solution @xmath61 of eq .
( [ smoluchowski ] ) in order to obtain the following expression for the effective mobility @xmath62 : @xmath63 the factor @xmath64 in eq .
( [ effective mobility ] ) is defined by @xmath65 and has dimensions of length . in the limit @xmath66
, it has been shown that @xmath67 .
equation ( [ effective mobility ] ) shows that the effective mobility @xmath16 is a non - linear function of the external force @xmath1 , no matter if the mean field temperature @xmath0 is or not a function of @xmath1 . assuming that the periodic potential energy is of the form @xmath68+\frac{8}{10}\sin^2\left[\frac{2\pi x}{l}\right]\right)%\ ] ] and approximating the arguments of the exponentials in eq .
( [ a ] ) by their first order series expansion in terms of @xmath69 , it is possible to compare our results with the simulation data for the dependence of the mobility coefficient on the externally applied force @xcite , see fig .
other potentials may be used to make the interpolation of simulation data ( not shown ) .
the set of parameters change but the fit is equally good .
we assumed the potential ( [ periodic potential ] ) , shown in fig .
1a , because it has a combination of large and small energy barriers .
it is convenient to mention that the potential energy @xmath70 is an effective potential , a mean force potential , whose parameters may depend upon the temperature @xcite . for the interpolation of the simulation data in in fig .
1a we have assumed @xmath71 and @xmath72 in all cases .
for the blue circles ( data ) and the blue solid line we have used @xmath73 , @xmath74 and @xmath75 ; for the orange squares and the orange dashed line we have used @xmath76 , @xmath77 and @xmath78 ; for the green diamonds and the green dotted - dashed line we have used @xmath79 , @xmath80 and @xmath81 ; for the red upward triangles and the red solid line we have used @xmath82 , @xmath83 and @xmath84 , for the purple downward triangles and the purple dashed line we have used @xmath85 , @xmath86 and @xmath87 and , finally , for the purple downward triangles and the purple dashed line we have used @xmath88 , @xmath89 and @xmath87 .
units are arbitrary .
an interesting question regarding these results is related with the fluctuation - dissipation theorem . in ref .
@xcite , it was shown for colloidal suspensions at arbitrary volume fractions that the stokes - einstein relation has to be modified by considering the natural scaling of all the quantities involved , the effective diffusion and viscosity coefficients and the effective temperature , in order to cope with experimental data .
following this idea , we propose that for molecular glasses a generalized stokes - einstein relation similar to eq .
( 3 ) of ref .
@xcite may hold , that is : @xmath90 where we have introduced the long - time collective diffusion coefficient @xmath91 .
fig 1b shows the scaling of this quantity in terms of the effective temperature @xmath0 .
this result means that the effective temperature is the natural scaling variable of the system , in similar form as the effective volume fraction is the natural scaling variable of concentrated colloidal suspensions @xcite .
other calculations showing correction of the diffusion coefficient when brownian particles move along periodic and tilted potentials are reported in ref .
as a summary , in this work we have shown the distinction between the damping coefficient and the effective non - linear mobility of driven particles in active micro - rheology of supercooled liquids .
in addition , we have shown that the origins of the effective temperature and of the effective mobility also differ .
the effective temperature is a consequence of the dynamic coupling between kinetic and configurational degrees of freedom .
the effective mobility arises as a collective effect that gives insight into the energy landscape of the system . from the interplay between these quantities it was possible to formulate a generalized stokes - einstein relation that may be used to determine the collective diffusion coefficient in non - linear microrheology of atomic glasses .
comparison of our theoretical results with simulation data is remarkably good .
we believe that our findings may be of utility in understanding the thermo - dynamics of glassy systems .
this work was supported by the dgicyt of spanish government under grant no .
fis2015 - 67837-p and by unam dgapa grant no . in113415 .
we also thank the academic mobility program between the university of barcelona and the national autonomous university of mexico .
|
shown non - equilibrated energy transfer between kinetic configuration freedom breakdown classical stokes - einstein relation in suspensions particles at arbitrary concentrations breakdown quantified in effective temperature @xmath0 depends on local confining forces tracer particle during motion fluid constant external force @xmath1 applied on particles coupling between configuration kinetic freedom stronger effective temperature contains effect external force similar effect reported in simulations on active non - linear microrheology of supercooled liquids in refs @xcite correspondence between simulation results theory remarkable methodology in ref.@xcite potential energy landscape concept differs from same effect with thermal fluctuations effective temperature appears if @xmath3 is probability density in @xmath4space @xmath5 @xmath6 position velocity of driven particle problem for systems arrested state like concentrated particle suspensions supercooled liquids assumption of adiabatic decoupling @xmath7 no longer valid use exact definition @xmath8 different time scales of dynamics not well separated implications on scaling effective temperature mobility of glasses glass like systems discuss these implicationsprovide theoretical conceptual framework understand non - equilibrium description fokker - planck smoluchowski equations origin of effective temperature mobility formulate generalized fluctuation - dissipation theorem stokes - einstein relation valid for equilibrium systems under external force illustrate results considering tracer particles in non - linear microrheology in atomic glasses article organized section ii physics non - adiabatic decoupling fokker - planck description iii origin force dependent temperature section iv origin effective mobility mean field description section v generalization stokes - einstein relation summary conclusions section vi introduce kramers - fokker - planck equation @xmath9 describes dynamics of non - interacting brownian degrees of freedom velocity position of driven particles in contact with heat bath @xmath10 specific energy landscape @xmath11 mass particles @xmath12 temperature heat bath @xmath13 boltzmann s constant @xmath14 damping coefficient friction per unit of mass of single particle differ from effective friction coefficient @xmath15 ensemble @xmath16 mobility aim to calculate explicit expression of @xmath17from reduced density @xmath18 normalization probability expressed by @xmath19 configurational probability density evolves according@xmath20 equation configurational probability obtained by partial integration of eq fokker - planck over velocity defines current @xmath21 @xmath22 constitutive relation for @xmath23 obtained by time derivative of @xmath24 using fokker planck integrating parts assuming currents vanish at boundaries neglecting time derivative @xmath25 resulting expression is @xmath26 - \beta^{-1 large external forces cause local inhomogeneities no clear time separation between relaxation fast and slow variables to underdamped motion of driven particles @xmath27 not given by maxwellian second moment of @xmath27 yields nonequilibrium temperature @xmath28 @xmath29 to know explicit dependencies of @xmath27 make overall estimate of effective temperature defining @xmath30 using eq fokker - planck obtain modified rayleigh equation @xmath31 + \partial introduced volume averaged specific force : @xmath32rayleigh equation valid up to zero order in expansion @xmath33 @xmath34 characteristic length system describes relaxation of spatially - averaged distribution @xmath35 includes effect of external forces on dynamics fast variable through time dependent quantity @xmath36 solution of found by method of characteristics velocity @xmath6 determined by initial velocity @xmath37 through relation @xmath38 change of variables from @xmath6 to @xmath39 transforms eq into @xmath40 second change @xmath41 @xmath42 leads to@xmath43 solution is gaussian@xcite original variables reads @xmath44 @xmath45{2k long time dependence of @xmath35 on @xmath37 disappears if @xmath36 slow varying function of argument@xmath46 long time quasi - stationary limit of eq becomes@xmath47{2k second moment of eq given by @xmath48^{2}\equiv equation is spatial average of nonequilibrium temperature @xmath28 introduced in eq : @xmath49 eq . ( second moment ] ) contains damping coefficient @xmath14 corrective effect external forces on thermal energy particles brownian motion extra energy from non - equilibrated energy distribution velocities eq . second moment interpreted as equipartition theorem defining thermal energy system proportional to non - equilibrium mean - field effective temperature @xmath0 potential energy form @xmath50 due to external force @xmath1 eq . second moment reduces to @xmath51 literature nonlinear - active microrheology strategies introduce effective temperature similar to eq . ( meanfield temperature authors inferred existence analyzing mean square displacement diffusion coefficient externally applied force potential energy landscape approach population distribution of metabasin energies external force energy distribution maintains gaussian form shifted towards higher energies effect effective temperature dependence on force coincides with eq . meanfield temperature mean - field description using @xmath2 first term right side of eq . yields @xmath52 substituted into eq .configurational probability yields mean - field smoluchowski equation @xmath53\right introduced mean - field diffusion coefficient @xmath54 bare mobility coefficient @xmath55 on damping coefficient @xmath14 calculation effective mobility coefficient define local velocity @xmath56 as @xmath57 @xmath58 eq diffusion current @xcite @xmath59 characteristic length of cage @xmath34 coincides with periodicity potential energy @xmath60 substitute stationary solution @xmath61 smoluchowski obtain expression effective mobility @xmath62 : @xmath63 factor @xmath64 effective mobility defined by @xmath65 dimensions length limit @xmath66 shown @xmath67 effective mobility mobility @xmath16 non - linear function of external force @xmath1 mean field temperature @xmath0 periodic potential energy form @xmath68+\frac{8}{10}\sin^2\left[\frac{2\pi x}{l}\right]\right)%\ arguments exponentials first order series expansion @xmath69 compare results with simulation data for dependence mobility coefficient on externally applied force @xcite see fig potentials used interpolation simulation data not shown parameters change fit good assumed potential fig . 1a large small energy barriers potential energy @xmath70 effective potential mean force potential parameters depend temperature @xcite interpolation simulation data fig . 1a assumed @xmath71 @xmath72 blue circles blue solid line used @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 orange squares orange dashed line @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 green diamonds green dotted - dashed line @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath81 red upward triangles red solid line used @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 purple downward triangles purple dashed line @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 purple downward triangles dashed line used @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath87 units arbitrary question fluctuation - dissipation theorem colloidal suspensions arbitrary volume fractions stokes - einstein relation modified considering natural scaling quantities effective diffusion viscosity coefficients effective temperature cope experimental data propose for molecular glasses generalized stokes - einstein relation similar eq . ( 3 ) ref@xcite hold @xmath90 introduced long - time collective diffusion coefficient @xmath91 fig 1b shows scaling quantity effective temperature @xmath0 effective temperature natural scaling variable system effective volume fraction concentrated colloidal suspensions calculations correction diffusion coefficient brownian particles move tilted potentials reported ref shown distinction damping coefficient effective non - linear mobility driven particles active micro - rheology supercooled liquids origins effective temperature effective mobility differ effective temperature consequence dynamic coupling kinetic configurational degrees freedom effective mobility collective effect insight energy landscape system generalized stokes - einstein relation determine collective diffusion coefficient non - linear microrheology atomic glasses comparison theoretical results simulation data good findings understanding thermo - dynamics glassy systems work supported dgicyt spanish government grant fis2015 - 67837-p unam dgapa grant in113415 thank academic mobility program university barcelona national autonomous university mexico
| 0.509768
| 3,255
| 1,654
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,778
|
peculiarities of transport properties of three- and two - dimensional half - metallic ferromagnets are investigated , which are connected with the absence of spin - flip scattering processes .
the temperature and magnetic field dependences of resistivity in various regimes are calculated .
the resistivity is proportional to @xmath0 for @xmath1 and to @xmath2 for @xmath3 @xmath4 being the crossover temperature for longitudinal scattering processes .
the latter scale plays also an important role in magnetoresistance@xmath5 the contribution of non - quasiparticle ( incoherent ) states to the transport properties is discussed .
it is shown that they can dominate in the temperature dependence of the impurity - induced resistivity and in the tunnel junction conductivity .
|
half - metallic ferromagnets ( hmf ) @xcite attract now a growing attention of researchers , first of all , because of their importance for `` spintronics '' , or spin - dependent electronics @xcite .
hmf have metallic electronic structure for one spin projection ( majority- or minority - spin states ) , but for the opposite spin direction the fermi level lies in the energy gap @xcite .
therefore the corresponding contributions to electronic transport properties have different orders of magnitude , which can result in a huge magnetoresistance for heterostructures containing hmf @xcite .
a discovery of the half - metallic ferromagnetism in colossal magnetoresistance ( cmr ) materials like la@xmath6sr@xmath7mno@xmath8 @xcite has increased considerably the interest in this topic .
transport properties of hmf are the subject of numerous experimental investigations ( see , e.g. , recent works for cro@xmath9 @xcite and nimnsb @xcite , and the reviews @xcite ) . at the same time
, the theoretical interpretation of these results is still a problem . as for electronic scattering mechanisms , the most important difference between hmf and `` standard '' itinerant electron ferromagnets like iron or nickel
is the absence of one - magnon scattering processes in the former case @xcite .
two - magnon scattering processes have been considered many years ago for both the broad - band case ( weak @xmath10 exchange interaction ) @xcite and narrow - band case ( `` double exchange model '' ) @xcite .
the obtained temperature dependence of the resistivity have the form @xmath2 and @xmath11 , respectively . at low enough temperatures
the first result fails and should be replaced by @xmath0 as well @xcite ; the reason is the compensation of the transverse and longitudinal contributions in the long - wavelength limit which is a consequence of the rotational symmetry of the @xmath10 exchange hamiltonian @xcite . up to
now there are no results which describe in the whole temperature region the resistivity of hfm and especially its magnetic - field dependence which is most interesting from the experimental point of view .
such expressions are obtained in sect.2 . apart from three - dimensional case studied before @xcite we consider also two - dimensional hmf keeping in mind , e.g. , layered cmr compounds like lasr@xmath9mn@xmath9o@xmath12 ( for a review see ref.@xcite ) which are almost half - metallic according to the recent band - structure calculations @xcite .
owing to peculiar band structure of hfm , an important role belongs to incoherent ( non - quasiparticle ) states which occur near the fermi level because of correlation effects @xcite . in sect.3
we treat the corresponding contributions to resistivity and discuss tunneling phenomena in hmf .
to investigate effects of interaction of current carriers with local moments we use the hamiltonian of the @xmath13 exchange model @xmath14 where @xmath15 , @xmath16 and @xmath17 are operators for conduction electrons and localized spins in the quasimomentum representation , the electron spectrum @xmath18 is referred to the fermi level @xmath19 , @xmath20 is the @xmath13 exchange parameter which will be put for simplicity @xmath21-independent , @xmath22 are the pauli matrices . in the spin - wave region
we have @xmath23 the zero - order hamiltonian includes non - interacting electrons and magnons , @xmath24 with @xmath25 being the spin splitting which is included in @xmath26 , @xmath27 are the holstein - primakoff boson operators . in the half - metallic case the spin - flip processes do not work in the second order in @xmath28 since the states with one spin projection only are present at the fermi level . at the same time , we have to consider the renormalization of the longitudinal processes in higher orders in @xmath28 ( formally , we have to include the terms up to the second order in the quasiclassical small parameter @xmath29 ) . to this end
we eliminate from the hamiltonian the terms which are linear in the magnon operators by using the canonical transformation @xcite , @xmath30 with @xmath31 then we obtain the effective hamiltonian @xmath32 here @xmath33 is the @xmath10 scattering amplitude which vanishes at @xmath34 and thereby takes properly into account the rotational symmetry of electron - magnon interaction .
more general interpolation expression for the effective amplitude which does not assume the smallness of @xmath35 or @xmath29 was obtained in ref.@xcite by a variational approach ; it does not differ qualitatively from simple expression ( [ amp ] ) . in the case of a considerably @xmath21-dependent exchange parameter , which may be relevant for real itinerant magnets including hfm , one has in ( [ hef ] ) @xmath36 the most general and rigorous method for calculating the transport relaxation time is the use of the kubo formula for the conductivity @xmath37
@xcite @xmath38 where @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 is the current operator , @xmath42 is the electron velocity . representing the total hamiltonian in the form @xmath43 , the correlator in ( [ kru ] )
may be expanded in the perturbation @xmath44 @xcite . in the second order
we obtain for the electrical resistivity @xmath45[{\cal h}^{^{\prime } } , j_x]\rangle\ ] ] where @xmath46 is calculated with the hamiltonian @xmath26 .
provided that the perturbation hamiltonian has the form @xmath47 we obtain @xmath48 \label{rho}\ ] ] with @xmath49 this approach is equivalent to the solution of the boltzmann transport equation by the variational method @xcite . in the hfm situation
the band states with one spin projection only , @xmath50 are present at the fermi level @xcite . below we consider the case @xmath51 @xmath52 and omit the spin indices in the electron spectrum .
we find from eq.([rho ] ) the following expression for the transport relaxation time @xmath53 defined by @xmath54@xmath55 where @xmath56 and @xmath57 are the bose and fermi functions .
a similar expression has been derived first in ref.@xcite , but with the replacement of the effective amplitude just by @xmath28 .
after some transformations we obtain @xmath58 averaging over the angles of the vector @xmath21 leads to the result @xmath59 with @xmath60 where @xmath61 for @xmath62 and @xmath63}^2}{({\bf p - q)}^2q_0 ^ 2}\,\,\,(p , q\ll q_0).\ ] ] the wavevector @xmath64 determines the boundary of the region where @xmath65-dependence of the amplitude become important , so that @xmath66 at @xmath67
. in the case @xmath68 the simple perturbation theory fails and we have to take into account the spin splitting by careful collecting the terms of higher orders in @xmath28 . in the simple one - band model of hmf
where @xmath69 one has @xmath70
( @xmath71 is the conduction bandwidth , lattice constant is put to unity ) @xcite . generally speaking
, @xmath64 may be sufficiently small provided that the energy gap is much smaller than @xmath71 , which is the case for real hmf systems .
a `` crossover '' wavector may exist in principle even for the narrow - band case ( where , instead of spin splitting , the spin subbands have different widths ) provided that the fermi level is close to the gap edge for the spin projection @xmath72 .
the quantity @xmath64 determines a characteristic temperature and energy scale @xmath73 where @xmath74 is the spin - wave stiffness defined by @xmath75 , @xmath76 is the curie temperature .
note that in the case of an usual ferromagnetic metal the scale for existence of one - magnon processes is smaller , @xmath77 . when estimating temperature dependences of resistivity one has to bear in mind that each power of @xmath78 or @xmath79 yields @xmath80 at very low temperatures @xmath1 small quasimomenta @xmath81 yield main contribution to the integrals . averaging the quantity ( [ lam ] ) over the angle between the vectors @xmath82 and @xmath65 we derive @xmath83 with @xmath84
. then we obtain for the resistivity @xmath85 such a dependence was obtained in the narrow - band case ( double - exchange model with large @xmath35 ) , where the scale @xmath4 is absent @xcite , and by the diagram approach in the broad - band case @xcite . at the same time , at @xmath86 the function @xmath87 in eq .
( [ lam ] ) can be replaced by unity to obtain @xmath88 this result is in agreement with the old works @xcite .
now we treat the two - dimensional ( @xmath89 ) situation which may be appropriate for layered manganites like la@xmath90ca@xmath91mn@xmath9o@xmath12 @xcite . at low temperatures we obtain @xmath92 at the same time , for @xmath86
we obtain after replacing the scattering amplitude by unity a logarithmically divergent integral which should be cut at @xmath4 .
thus we get @xmath93 to calculate the magnetoresistivity we introduce the gap in the magnon spectrum , @xmath94 provided that the external magnetic field @xmath95 is large in comparison with the anisotropy gap , @xmath96 is proportional to @xmath95 . in the @xmath97 case the resistivity at @xmath98 is linear in magnetic field , @xmath99 the situation at @xmath86 is more interesting since the quantity @xmath100 contains a divergence which is cut at @xmath101 or @xmath4 .
we have at @xmath102 @xmath103^{1/2}}\ ] ] ( of course , at @xmath104 the resistivity is exponentially small ) .
a negative @xmath95-linear magnetoresistance was observed recently in cro@xmath9 @xcite .
in the @xmath89 case we obtain @xmath105 where @xmath106 this integral diverges logarithmically at @xmath107 and as @xmath108 at @xmath109 taking into account the lower limit cutoff we derive @xmath110 we see that simple replacement of the electron - magnon scattering amplitude by @xmath28 does not enable one to describe correctly magnetoresistance even at @xmath111
now we treat the impurity contributions to transport properties in the presence of potential scattering ( they were considered first in @xcite , see also @xcite ) . to second order in the impurity potential @xmath112
we derive for the electron green s function @xmath113\ ] ] where @xmath114^{-1}\ ] ] is the exact green s function for the ideal crystal . in the second order in @xmath115
the electron self - energy has the form @xmath116 with @xmath117 the fermi function . neglecting vertex corrections and averaging over impurities we obtain for the transport relaxation time @xmath118 thus the contributions under consideration are determined by the energy dependence of the density of states @xmath119 for the interacting system near the fermi level .
the most nontrivial dependence comes from the non - quasiparticle ( incoherent ) states with the spin projection @xmath120 which are present near @xmath19 ( fig.1 ) .
they originate from the imaginary part of the electron self - energy @xcite .
we obtain at @xmath121 @xmath122 the contribution ( [ inc ] ) is asymmetric and vanishes at @xmath19 ( figs.1,2 ) . near the fermi level
it is determined by the magnon density of states @xmath123 and follows a power law , @xmath124 is the maximum magnon frequency , @xmath125 is the step function , @xmath126 is referred to @xmath19 ; we have @xmath127 and @xmath128 for @xmath97 and @xmath89 cases , respectively .
the corresponding correction to resistivity reads @xmath129 the contribution of the order of @xmath130 with @xmath131 ( which is not too far from 3/2 ) has been observed recently in the temperature dependence of the resistivity for nimnsb @xcite .
the incoherent contribution to magnetoresistivity is given by @xmath132 so that we obtain a temperature - independent term in the @xmath89 case .
the non - quasiparticle states in hmf can be probed also by nuclear magnetic resonance ( nmr ) since they lead to the unusual temperature dependence for the longitudinal nuclear magnetic relaxation rate , @xmath133 instead of the @xmath134-linear korringa contribution which is absent in hmf @xcite .
another useful tool is provided by tunneling phenomena @xcite , especially by andreev reflection spectroscopy for a hmf - superconductor tunnel junction @xcite .
the most direct way is probably the measurement of a tunnel current between two pieces of hmf with the opposite magnetization directions . to this end
we consider a standard tunneling hamiltonian ( see , e.g. , ref .
@xcite ) where @xmath136 are the hamiltonians of the left ( right ) half - spaces , respectively , @xmath21 and @xmath82 are the corresponding quasimomenta , and spin projections are defined with respect to the magnetization direction of a given half - space ( spin is supposed to be conserving in the `` global '' coordinate system ) .
carrying out standard calculations of the tunneling current @xmath137 in the second order in @xmath138 one has ( cf .
@xcite ) to conclude , we have considered peculiarities of transport properties of half - metallic ferromagnets which are connected with the unusual electronic structure of these systems .
further experimental investigations would be of great importance , especially keeping in mind possible role of hmf for applications @xcite .
the research described was supported in part by grant no.00 - 15 - 96544 from the russian basic research foundation , by russian science support foundation , and by the netherlands organization for scientific research ( grant nwo 047 - 008 - 16 ) .
|
half - metallic ferromagnets ( hmf ) @xcite attract attention importance for spintronics - dependent electronics hmf have metallic electronic structure for one spin projection opposite spin fermi level in energy gap contributions to electronic transport properties different orders magnitude in huge magnetoresistance for heterostructures containing hmf discovery of half - metallic ferromagnetism in colossal magnetoresistance materials like la@xmath6sr@xmath7mno@xmath8 @xcite increased interest transport properties of hmf subject of experimental investigations theoretical interpretation problem difference between hmf standard itinerant electron ferromagnets absence of one - magnon scattering processes in former @xcite two - magnon scattering processes considered for broad - band and narrow - band case obtained temperature dependence of resistivity form @xmath2 and @xmath11 at low temperatures first result fails replaced by @xmath0 reason compensation of transverse and longitudinal contributions in long - wavelength limit rotational symmetry of @xmath10 exchange hamiltonian @xciteno results temperature resistivity hfm magnetic - field dependence interesting experimental expressions obtained in sect.2 three - dimensional case consider two - dimensional hmf layered cmr compounds like almost half - metallic band - structure calculations peculiar band structure hfm important role incoherent non - quasiparticle states near fermi level correlation effects sect.3 treat contributions resistivity discuss tunneling phenomena in hmf interaction current carriers with local moments hamiltonian @xmath13 exchange model operators for conduction electrons localized spins electron spectrum @xmath18 fermi level @xmath19 @xmath13 exchange parameter @xmath21-independent @xmath22 pauli matrices spin - wave region @xmath23 zero - order hamiltonian includes non - interacting electrons magnons @xmath24 spin splitting @xmath26 @xmath27 holstein - primakoff boson operators half - metallic case spin - flip processes work second order @xmath28 states one spin projection at fermi levelconsider renormalization longitudinal processes higher orders @xmath28 include terms up second order small parameter @xmath29 eliminate hamiltonian terms linear in magnon operators canonical transformation @xcite @xmath30 @xmath31 obtain effective hamiltonian @xmath32 @xmath33 is @xmath10 scattering amplitude vanishes at @xmath34 rotational symmetry electron - magnon interaction effective amplitude smallness @xmath35 or @xmath29 obtained.@xcite variational approach differ from expression amp @xmath21-dependent exchange parameter relevant for real itinerant magnets @xmath36 calculating transport relaxation time kubo formula for conductivity @xmath37 @xcite @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 current operator @xmath42 electron velocity total hamiltonian @xmath43 correlator ( [ kru ] expanded in perturbation @xmath44 @xcite second order obtain electrical resistivity @xmath45 @xmath46 calculated with hamiltonian @xmath26 perturbation hamiltonian form @xmath47 obtain @xmath48 with @xmath49 equivalent to solution boltzmann transport equation by variational method @xcitehfm situation band states one spin projection @xmath50 present fermi level @xcite consider case @xmath51 @xmath52 omit spin indices electron spectrum eq.([rho expression transport relaxation time @xmath53 defined @xmath54@xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 bose fermi functions similar expression derived ref.@xcite replacement effective amplitude by @xmath28 transformations @xmath58 averaging angles vector @xmath21 leads result @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 wavevector @xmath64 determines boundary region @xmath65-dependence amplitude important @xmath66 at @xmath67 case @xmath68 perturbation theory fails spin splitting collecting terms higher orders @xmath28 one - band model hmf @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 conduction bandwidth lattice constant unity @xcite @xmath64 small energy gap smaller than @xmath71 real hmf systems `` crossover '' wavector exist narrow - band case spin subbands different widths fermi level close to gap edge spin projection @xmath72quantity @xmath64 determines temperature energy scale @xmath73 @xmath74 spin - wave stiffness curie temperature usual ferromagnetic metal scale one - magnon processes smaller @xmath77 estimating temperature dependences resistivity power @xmath78 @xmath79 yields @xmath80 at low temperatures @xmath1 small quasimomenta @xmath81 contribution integrals averaging quantity lam over angle between vectors @xmath82 @xmath65 derive @xmath83 @xmath84 resistivity @xmath85 dependence obtained narrow - band case scale @xmath4 absent broad - band case @xmath86 function @xmath87 replaced by unity @xmath88 agreement old works treat two - dimensional @xmath89 ) situation appropriate for layered manganites low temperatures obtain @xmath92 @xmath86 replacing scattering amplitude unity logarithmically divergent integral cut at @xmath4 @xmath93 calculate magnetoresistivity introduce gap in magnon spectrum @xmath94 external magnetic field @xmath95 large anisotropy gap @xmath96 proportional to @xmath95@xmath97 resistivity @xmath98 linear magnetic field @xmath99 @xmath86 interesting @xmath100 divergence cut at @xmath101 @xmath4 @xmath102 @xmath103^{1/2}}\ ] ] @xmath104 resistivity small negative @xmath95-linear magnetoresistance observed cro@xmath9 @xcite @xmath89 @xmath105 @xmath106 diverges @xmath107 @xmath108 @xmath109 derive @xmath110 replacement electron - magnon scattering amplitude @xmath28 describe magnetoresistance @xmath111 treat impurity contributions transport properties potential scattering second order impurity potential @xmath112 electron green s function @xmath113\ @xmath114^{-1}\ ] ] exact green s function ideal crystal second @xmath115 electron self - energy form @xmath116 @xmath117 fermi function transport relaxation time @xmath118 contributions determined energy dependence density of states @xmath119 interacting system fermi level nontrivial dependence non - quasiparticle incoherent states spin projection @xmath120 near @xmath19 originate imaginary electron self - energy @xciteobtain @xmath121 contribution asymmetric vanishes at @xmath19 fermi level determined by magnon density @xmath123 follows power law @xmath124 maximum magnon frequency step function referred to @xmath19 @xmath127 and @xmath128 for @xmath97 @xmath89 cases correction to resistivity reads @xmath129 contribution @xmath130 @xmath131 3/2 observed in temperature dependence resistivity nimnsb incoherent contribution to magnetoresistivity by @xmath132 temperature - independent term in @xmath89 case non - quasiparticle states in hmf probed by nuclear magnetic resonance unusual temperature dependence longitudinal nuclear magnetic relaxation rate @xmath133 @xmath134-linear korringa contribution absent in hmf tool tunneling phenomena andreev reflection spectroscopy hmf - superconductor tunnel junction measurement tunnel current between pieces hmf opposite magnetization directions standard tunneling hamiltonian @xmath136 hamiltonians of left right half - spaces @xmath21 @xmath82 quasimomenta spin projections defined magnetization direction half - space spin global coordinate systemstandard calculations tunneling current @xmath137 second order considered transport properties half - metallic ferromagnets connected unusual electronic structure further experimental investigations importance possible role hmf applications @xcite research supported grant.00 - 15 - 96544 russian basic research foundation russian science support foundation netherlands organization scientific research grant 047 - 008 - 16 )
| 0.504507
| 3,204
| 1,672
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,790
|
stationary wave solutions of the perturbed korteweg - de vries equation are considered in the presence of external hamiltonian perturbations .
conditions of their chaotic behaviour are studied with the help of melnikov theory . for the homoclinic chaos poincar sections
are constructed to demonstrate the complicated behaviour , and lyapunov exponents are also numerically calculated .
+ keywords : korteweg - de vries equation , hamiltonian perturbations , melnikov theory , poincar sections .
* chaotic behaviour of the solutions to a perturbed korteweg - de vries equation * + + k.b .
blyuss + _ department of mathematics and statistics + university of surrey , gu2 5xh , guildford , uk _ + e - mail : k.blyuss@surrey.ac.uk
|
recently there has been a significant attention to the chaotic behaviour of the solutions to partial differential equations . for example , chaos was found in a perturbed sine - gordon equation @xcite , nonlinear schrdinger equation @xcite , and later for korteweg - de vries - burgers equation @xcite and its generalization on high - order nonlinearities and the case of kadomtsev - petviashvili equation @xcite .
it was shown how chaos can appear in such systems which were completely integrable without perturbation via the appearance of subharmonics and homoclinic tangles .
for the kdv equation incorporating dissipation and instability @xcite it was shown that for the strongly dissipative case the overall evolution of solutions is chaotic with irregular soliton interactions . in our previous paper @xcite
we ve considered the influence of time - periodic hamiltonian external perturbations on a kdv system and showed , how the stochastic layer can appear on a phase plane near the unperturbed separatrix .
the width of this layer was calculated with the help of chirikov criterion for the overlap of resonances . in this work
we continue this study on an example of one - harmonic perturbation .
the fact that this perturbation is taken explicitly provides the possibility to obtain an exact expression for the melnikov function in order to determine the transition to a chaotic behaviour . to study the system in a near - separatrix region , we transform the governing ode into a map for which the width of stochastic layer can be easily obtained . finally we plot poincar sections of chaotic behaviour and calculate the corresponding lyapunov exponents .
we start with the perturbed korteweg - de vries equation taken in the form : @xmath0 here @xmath1 is assumed to be periodic on its last argument and will be taken simply as @xmath2 . transforming coordinates in a moving frame @xmath3 and considering steady waves @xmath4 , one obtains ( the primes are omitted ) : @xmath5 where @xmath6 ( supercritical case ) or @xmath7 ( subcritical case ) , @xmath8 , @xmath9 is the integration constant which can be chosen equal to zero from the condition that the solution is bounded at infinity . without loss of generality
we consider here only the supercritical case .
therefore we have : @xmath10 or with @xmath11 @xmath12 the outline of the rest of the paper is as follows . in the next section the unperturbed case of the korteweg - de vries equation
is considered and the explicit expressions for the solutions are obtained . later in section 3
conditions of chaos are derived on the basis of studying subharmonic and homoclinic melnikov functions .
then , in section 4 , we transform our ode ( [ 1.4 ] ) into a mapping , for which phase plots are presented together with the calculation of the width of the stochastic layer .
section 5 contains poincar plots numerically found in the vicinity of a saddle along with the lyapunov exponents which prove to be positive thereby supporting our conclusion about chaotic behaviour in the system .
finally , section 6 contains a summary and conclusions .
for the unperturbed system @xmath13 we simply have @xmath14 this is an equation of motion for a nonlinear oscillator in a potential field @xmath15 with the hamiltonian @xmath16 if we now look for the solutions of ( [ 2.1 ] ) in the form of elliptic jacobi functions of modulus @xmath17 : @xmath18 where @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 are depending on @xmath17 constants , then the following expressions can be easily obtained : @xmath22 here @xmath23 is the period of oscillations and @xmath24 is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind . in the limit @xmath25 ( [ 2.5 ] ) yields the separatrix @xmath26 phase plot of the system ( [ 2.1 ] ) as well as the potential energy ( [ 2.2 ] ) is presented in figure 1 .
the source of chaotic motion in our system is the homoclinic orbit on a phase plane . in the unperturbed case
this orbit is formed by coinciding stable and unstable manifolds of the saddle .
when there is a perturbation , the homoclinic orbit can be broken to yield the transverse intersection of stable and unstable manifolds , which gives rise to chaotic behaviour near the separatrix .
as far as one of the precursors of chaos is the appearance of subharmonics , we ll start with the subharmonic melnikov function defined for the periodic orbits as @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the unperturbed vector field corresponding to the solution @xmath29 with the period @xmath30 for @xmath31 , @xmath32 relatively prime integers , @xmath33 is the small vector of perturbation , and the wedge product is defined by @xmath34 . in considering our problem
we substitute the term @xmath35 for @xmath36 , and the term of perturbation @xmath37 for @xmath33 into the subharmonic melnikov function , therefore obtaining : @xmath38 calculations with the help of fourier representation of elliptic functions @xcite finally give : @xmath39 where @xmath40},\mbox { } k'(m)=k(1-m).\ ] ] as it is clearly seen from ( [ 3.3 ] ) @xmath41 has simple zeros , what proves the presence of subharmonic bifurcations @xcite . to move further the homoclinic melnikov function @xmath42 can be introduced as a limit of @xmath41 when @xmath43 , @xmath44 , and @xmath45 : @xmath46dx}=\frac{12\pi\omega^{2}f_{0}}{\sinh{\pi\omega\sqrt{\frac{\beta}{v}}}}\sin{\omega\theta}.\ ] ] surely this function also has simple zeros on @xmath47 and therefore proves the existence of transverse homoclinic orbits .
the presence of these orbits means , via smale - birkhoff theorem , the appearance of a smale horseshoe in the vicinity of an unperturbed saddle and thereby homoclinic chaos in this region of a phase space @xcite .
we note here that unlike the situation with dissipation ( like in @xcite or @xcite ) , when melnikov theory resulted in some relation between the perturbation amplitude , frequency and the dissipation coefficient , in our case there are no such restrictions .
it should be also noted that although the presence of a stochastic layer near the separatrix can be stated for rather generic hamiltonian perturbation making system near - integrable @xcite , the transverse intersection of stable and unstable manifolds is still a question which should solved by melnikov theory in every particular case .
to study the chaotic motion near the separatrix we shall use the whisker mapping ( separatrix mapping ) @xcite . to derive it we note first that the change in the unperturbed energy is given by : @xmath48 where @xmath49 is the momentum .
since the perturbation is a periodic function of time , we may introduce the phase of perturbation : @xmath50 which is an equivalent of time . in order to obtain the desired separatrix mapping one
has to consider the discretized time scale @xmath51 , and the mapping will involve @xmath52 and @xmath53 as variables . the change of phase after one period of oscillations is equal to @xmath54 , while energy change @xmath55 .
now we can estimate the change in the unperturbed energy @xmath56 per period of motion in proximity separatrix at time @xmath51 : @xmath57dx}\approx\beta f_{0}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{z_{0}(x)\cos\left[\omega(x+x_{n})\right]dx}.\ ] ] here we have approximated @xmath56 by evaluating the integral ( [ 4.2 ] ) on the unperturbed separatrix in accordance with the standard procedure @xcite . as it is clearly seen from the comparison of ( [ 3.5 ] ) and ( [ 4.2 ] ) , @xmath58 .
expansions of @xmath59 and @xmath60 in the vicinity of @xmath61 give finally the following correlation between them : @xmath62 $ ] . using this approximate period we can write the separatrix mapping in the following form : @xmath63
if to measure the stretching of a small phase interval with the parameter @xmath64 @xcite , one can detect the border of chaotic motion as an appearance of a local instability in phase : @xmath65 .
for the mapping ( [ 4.4 ] ) this condition gives the following approximation for the width of the stochastic layer @xmath66 : @xmath67 typical form of this dependence is presented in the fig .
2 . in fig . 3 ,
4 we have plotted the phase plane of the mapping ( @xmath68 , @xmath69 ) for different values of the perturbation amplitude @xmath70 .
3(right ) shows how the stochastic layer arises around the unperturbed separatrix .
then the width of this layer increases together with @xmath70 , leading finally to a chaotic sea , as demonstrated in fig .
4(right ) .
in this section we present the poincar sections of ( [ 1.4 ] ) in the vicinity of the saddle @xmath71 , which show homoclinic crossings in this region .
the methods used were runge - kutta - fehlberg and adams - bashford - moulton ( `` predictor - corrector '' ) method .
local chaotic behaviour is detected by the numerical calculation of the dominant lyapunov exponent .
it was computed using the method due to @xcite .
the system of equations , which defines the value of this exponent , was integrated with the runge - kutta fourth - order algorithm , while the equation ( [ 1.4 ] ) for a fiducial trajectory was run with fourth - order symplectic scheme @xcite . in figures 5 - 8
the poincar sections are presented for the system ( [ 1.4 ] ) with the forcing amplitude @xmath72 and different values of the frequency : @xmath73 , @xmath74 , @xmath75 and @xmath76 .
the value of the largest lyapunov exponent in these cases is @xmath77 , @xmath78 , @xmath79 and @xmath80 respectively , and so we can state that we really have chaotic motion in a close vicinity of a separatrix , as it was predicted
. numerical calculation of the lyapunov exponent in the region of regular dynamics with initial conditions at @xmath81 yields @xmath82 , and therefore our results can be taken as significant .
in this work we have considered the stationary wave reduction of the korteweg - de vries equation under small hamiltonian perturbations . on the basis of melnikov theory
it was shown how chaos can occur in this situation via the appearance of subharmonics and a further homoclinic tangle .
theoretical predictions about chaotic behaviour are supported numerically by plotting poincar sections and calculation of the corresponding lyapunov exponents . in a near - separatrix region
the governing ode was transformed into a mapping what allowed one to find the width of the stochastic layer .
our future work will focus on the development of kinetic description of chaotic behaviour for the obtained mapping @xcite , and with the derivation of new methods for the symplectic integration of the kdv equation under hamiltonian perturbations following the framework of @xcite , where the same was done for sin - gordon system .
author would like to thank prof .
m. bestehorn for stimulating discussions , kai neuffer for help with numerics , and dr .
s. reich for the information about symplectic integration methods .
zheng , w.j .
yeh , o.g .
symko : _ phys .
lett . _ a * 140 * , 225 - 228 ( 1989 ) h.t . moon : _ phys .
lett . _ * 64 * , 412 - 414 ( 1990 ) r. grimshaw , x. tian : _ proc .
london _ a * 445 , * 1 - 21 ( 1994 ) q. cao , k. djideli , w.g .
price , e.h.twizell : _ physica _ d * 125 * , 201 - 221 ( 1999 ) t. kawahara , s. toh : _ on some properties of solutions to a nonlinear evolution equation inlcuding long - wavelength instability _ , in _ nonlinear wave motion _ * 43 * , ed .
a. jeffrey , longman , new york , 1989 k.b .
blyuss : _ rep .
phys . _ * 46 * , 47 - 54 ( 2000 ) m. abramowitz , i. a. stegun : _ handbook of mathematical functions _ , dover , new york , 1972 j. guckenheimer , p. holmes : _ nonlinear oscillations , dynamical systems , and bifurcations of vector fields _ , 3rd printing , springer , new york , 1990 g.m .
zaslavsky , r.z .
sagdeev , d.a .
usikov , a.a .
chernikov : _ weak chaos and quasi - regular patterns _ , cup , cambridge , 1991 m. latka , b.j . west : _ phys . rev .
_ e * 52 * , 3252 - 3255 ( 1995 ) s. habib , r.d .
ryne : _ phys .
lett . _ * 74 * , 70 - 73 ( 1995 ) e. forest , r.d .
ruth , _ physica _
d * 43 * , 105 - 117 ( 1990 ) x. lu , r. schmid : _ mathematics and computers in simulation _ * 50 * , 255 - 263 ( 1999 )
|
attention to chaotic behaviour partial differential equations chaos found in perturbed sine - gordon equation nonlinear schrdinger equation korteweg - de vries - burgers equation kadomtsev - petviashvili equation chaos in systems integrable without perturbation via subharmonics homoclinic tangles kdv equation strongly dissipative case evolution solutions chaotic with irregular soliton interactions previous paper considered influence of time - periodic hamiltonian external perturbations on kdv system stochastic layer on phase plane near unperturbed separatrix width calculated with chirikov criterion for overlap continue study on one - harmonic perturbation provides possibility exact expression for melnikov function transition to chaotic behaviour study system near - separatrix region transform governing ode into map width of stochastic layer plot poincar sections of chaotic behaviour calculate lyapunov exponents start with perturbed korteweg - de vries equation @xmath1 assumed periodic on last argument taken as @xmath2transforming coordinates moving frame @xmath3 considering steady waves @xmath4 obtains primes omitted @xmath5 @xmath6 supercritical subcritical @xmath8 integration constant chosen equal to zero solution bounded at infinity consider supercritical case @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 outline paper next section unperturbed case korteweg - de vries equation considered explicit expressions solutions obtained section 3 conditions chaos derived studying subharmonic homoclinic melnikov functions section 4 ( [ 1.4 ] ) mapping phase plots presented calculation width stochastic layer section 5 poincar plots saddle lyapunov exponents positive supporting conclusion chaotic behaviour system section 6 summary conclusions unperturbed system @xmath13 @xmath14 equation of motion nonlinear oscillator potential field @xmath15 hamiltonian @xmath16 solutions ( [ 2.1 ] ) elliptic jacobi functions modulus @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath21 depending @xmath17 constants expressions obtained @xmath22 @xmath23 period of oscillations @xmath24 complete elliptic integral first kindlimit @xmath25 2.5 ) yields separatrix @xmath26 phase plot 2.1 potential energy ( 2.2 ] ) presented in figure 1 source chaotic motion is homoclinic orbit on phase plane unperturbed orbit formed by stable unstable manifolds perturbation orbit transverse intersection manifolds chaotic behaviour near separatrix chaos appearance subharmonics subharmonic melnikov function periodic orbits @xmath27 @xmath28 unperturbed vector field solution @xmath29 period @xmath30 for @xmath31 @xmath32 prime integers @xmath33 small vector of perturbation wedge product defined by @xmath34 substitute term @xmath35 for @xmath36 perturbation @xmath37 for @xmath33 into subharmonic melnikov function obtaining @xmath38 calculations fourier representation elliptic functions @xmath39 where @xmath40 k'(m)=k(1-m). @xmath41 has simple zeros proves subharmonic bifurcationshomoclinic melnikov function @xmath42 introduced limit of @xmath41 @xmath43 @xmath46dx}=\frac{12\pi\omega^{2}f_{0}}{{\pi\omega\sqrt{\beta}{v}}}}\sin{\omega\theta}. function has simple zeros on @xmath47 proves transverse homoclinic orbits presence orbits means appearance smale horseshoe unperturbed saddle homoclinic chaos phase space @xcite unlike dissipation perturbation amplitude frequency dissipation coefficient our case no restrictions presence stochastic layer near separatrix hamiltonian perturbation system near - integrable transverse intersection of stable unstable manifolds question solved by melnikov theory study chaotic motion near separatrix use whisker mapping ( separatrix mapping ) @xcite change in unperturbed energy given by @xmath48 @xmath49 is momentum perturbation periodic function of time introduce phase of perturbation : @xmath50 equivalent of time obtain desired separatrix mapping consider discretized time scale @xmath51 @xmath52 and @xmath53 as variableschange of phase after oscillations equal to @xmath54 energy change @xmath55 estimate change unperturbed energy @xmath56 per motion proximity separatrix @xmath51 : @xmath57dx approximated @xmath56 evaluating integral ( [ 4.2 ] ) on unperturbed separatrix standard procedure @xcite comparison of 3.5 4.2 @xmath58 expansions of @xmath59 @xmath60 vicinity @xmath61 give correlation : @xmath62 separatrix mapping @xmath63 stretching small phase interval with parameter @xmath64 border of chaotic motion as local instability in phase @xmath65 mapping ( [ 4.4 ] ) condition approximation for width stochastic layer @xmath66 : @xmath67 in fig . 2 fig . 3 4 plotted phase plane of mapping @xmath68 @xmath69 for perturbation amplitude @xmath70 stochastic layer arises around unperturbed separatrix width increases with @xmath70 leading to chaotic sea in fig . 4(rightpresent poincar sections [ 1.4 ] ) vicinity saddle @xmath71 show homoclinic crossings methods used runge - kutta - fehlberg adams - bashford - moulton local chaotic behaviour detected calculation dominant lyapunov exponent computed method @xcite system equations value integrated runge - kutta fourth algorithm equation [ 1.4 ] ) fiducial trajectory run fourth - order symplectic scheme @xcite figures 5 - 8 poincar sections presented system [ 1.4 ] ) forcing amplitude @xmath72 values frequency @xmath73 @xmath76 largest lyapunov exponent @xmath77 @xmath78 @xmath79 @xmath80 chaotic motion vicinity separatrix numerical calculation lyapunov exponent regular dynamics @xmath81 yields @xmath82 results significant considered stationary wave reduction korteweg - de vries equation small hamiltonian perturbations melnikov theory chaos appearance subharmonics homoclinic tangle theoretical predictions chaotic behaviour supported plotting poincar sections calculation lyapunov exponents near - separatrix region governing ode transformed mapping width stochastic layerfuture work kinetic description chaotic behaviour mapping @xcite new methods symplectic integration kdv equation hamiltonian perturbations framework @xcite sin - gordon system prof bestehorn kai neuffer dr s. reich information symplectic integration methods zheng yeh symko phys . lett. 140 225 - 228 ( 1989 ) . lett 64 * 412 - 414 ( 1990 ) grimshaw x tian. london 445 1 - 21 ( 1994 ) q cao djideli price e.twizell 125 * 201 - 221 ( 1999 ) kawahara s toh solutions nonlinear evolution equation long - wavelength instability nonlinear wave motion 43 jeffrey longman new york 1989 blyuss rep . 46 *, 47 - 54 ( 2000 ) abramowitz stegun handbook mathematical functions dover new york 1972 guckenheimer p. holmes nonlinear oscillations dynamical systems bifurcations vector fields 3rd printing springer new york 1990 zaslavsky sagdeev usikovchernikov weak chaos - regular patterns cup cambridge 1991 latka west phys . rev. 52 3252 - 3255 1995 ) habib ryne . lett. 74 70 - 73 1995 ) forest ruth 43 105 - 117 1990 ) x lu schmid mathematics computers simulation 50 255 - 263 1999 )
| 0.50333
| 3,115
| 1,662
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,793
|
the purpose of the paper is two - fold : to introduce a multivariable creative telescoping method , and to apply it in a problem of quantum topology : namely the computation of the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial of twist knots .
our multivariable creative telescoping method allows us to compute linear recursions for sums of the form @xmath1 given a recursion relation for @xmath2 a the hypergeometric kernel @xmath3 . as an application of our method
, we explicitly compute the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial for twist knots with @xmath4 and @xmath5 crossings .
the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial of a knot encodes the monic , linear , minimal order @xmath6-difference equation satisfied by the sequence of colored jones polynomials of the knot .
its specialization to @xmath7 is conjectured to be the better - known @xmath0-polynomial of a knot , which encodes important information about the geometry and topology of the knot complement . unlike the case of the jones polynomial , which is easily computable for knots with @xmath8 crossings , the @xmath0-polynomial is harder to compute and already unknown for some knots with @xmath9 crossings .
|
the purpose of the paper is two - fold : to introduce a multivariable creative telescoping method , and to apply it in a problem of quantum topology : namely the computation of the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial of twist knots .
our multivariable creative telescoping method allows us to compute linear recursions for sums of the form @xmath1 given a recursion relation for @xmath2 a the hypergeometric kernel @xmath3 .
general theory implies the existence of a recursion relation for @xmath2 . however , in practice the computation is not manageable for twist knots , and there is no guarantee that the recursion relation will be of minimal order .
our method does not guarantee a minimal order recursion relation either , however ( unlike the known methods ) it is manageable and produces a minimal order recursion relation the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial for twist knots of @xmath10 twists .
the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial encodes the unique monic , linear , minimal order @xmath6-difference equation satisfied by the sequence of colored jones polynomials of the knot .
our results give a new proof of the aj - conjecture for those knots . in this section
we recall the relevant laurent polynomial invariants of knots , such as the jones polynomial and its colored cousins . in 1985
v. jones introduced the famous _ jones polynomial _ of a knot @xmath11 in 3-space , @xcite .
the jones polynomial ( an element of @xmath12 $ ] ) is a powerful knot invariant which amongth other things detects cheirality , and it can be extended to a sequence @xmath13 of laurent polynomials by taking parallels of a knot @xmath11 .
technically , @xmath14 $ ] is the quantum group invariant of the 0-framed knot using the @xmath15-dimensional representation of @xmath16 , and normalized by @xmath17 . for a detailed definition ,
see @xcite and also @xcite . with this normalization
, we have that @xmath18 , and @xmath19 is the jones polynomial of @xmath11 . for a given knot @xmath11 , the sequence of laurent polynomials @xmath13 is not random .
to be precise , @xmath13 is @xmath6-_holonomic _ i.e. , it satisfies a linear @xmath6-difference equation ( which of course , depends on the knot ) with coefficients in @xmath20 .
this fact , proven in @xcite , is an easy consequence of two facts : * @xmath21 is a finite multisum of a proper @xmath6-hypergeometric term , as follows from the state - sum definition of the colored jones function ; see @xcite .
* ultisums of proper @xmath6-hypergeometric terms are @xmath6-holonomic , as follows from the wz theory of wilf - zeilberger ; see @xcite .
a @xmath6-holonomic sequence is annihilated by a unique monic homogeneous linear @xmath6-difference equation of smallest degree , and the corresponding monic polynomial in two @xmath6-commuting variables @xmath22 and @xmath23 is an invariant ( the so - called _ characteristic polynomial _ of the @xmath6-holonomic sequence .
we define the _ non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial _
@xmath24 of a knot @xmath11 to be the characteristic polynomial of @xmath13 . in @xcite
, it was conjectured by the first author ( the so - called aj conjecture ) that the specialization @xmath25 of @xmath24 should agree with the _ @xmath0-polynomial _ of a knot .
the latter is an important invariant that parametrizes the @xmath26 character variety of the knot complement , as viewed from the boundary torus . for a detailed definition of the @xmath0-polynomial ,
its properties and its applications to the geometry and topology of the knot complement , see @xcite .
thus , @xmath24 can be thought of as a deformation ( or quantization ) of the character variety .
the jones polynomial of a knot is easily computable via skein theory with knots with , say , @xmath8 crossings ; see for example @xcite . on the other hand ,
the @xmath0-polynomial of a knot is much harder to compute , and at present it is unknown for some knots with @xmath9 crossings .
there are two general methods to compute the @xmath0-polynomial : an exact ( primarily elimination , and puiseux expansions ) developed by boyd @xcite and a numerical one developed by culler @xcite .
the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial and its possible relation with the @xmath0-polynomial of a knot is an important ingredient to the hyperbolic volume conjecture and its generalization . for theoretical as well as experimental reasons it would be good to have explicit formulas for the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial .
so far , an explicit formula has been given for torus knots in @xcite ( using properties of the kauffman bracket skein module of the solid torus ) , as well as for the simplest hyperbolic @xmath27 knot in @xcite ( using an explicit single - sum formula for the colored jones function ) .
the wz algorithm has been implemented ( see @xcite ) and together with explicit state - sum formulas for the colored jones function of an arbitrary planar projection given in @xcite , in principle one can obtain a linear @xmath6-difference equation for the colored jones function of an arbitrary knot .
there are two problems with this approach : * the number of summation variables in the multisum formulas is generally two less than the number of crossings , and the @xmath6-multisum algorithms appear to be slow for the current machines .
* there is no guarantee that the various @xmath6-multisum algorithms will give a minimal order linear @xmath6-difference equation .
in fact , in many cases ( where symmetry is involved ) , it has been observed that they fail to give the minimal order @xmath6-difference equation .
see @xcite for well - known examples of this failure . with respect to the first problem , we were unable to use the sofware of @xcite to compute a @xmath6-difference equation for our double sums .
one might wonder whether problem ( b ) really occurs for the state - sums that originate in knot theory . as expected
, this problem _ does _ occur .
the knots @xmath28 and @xmath29 have double - sum formulas for their colored jones function .
an application of the @xmath6-multisum package of @xcite was done by takata in @xcite who found out an explicit inhomogeneous @xmath6-difference equation of degree @xmath30 and @xmath30 respectively . on the other hand , as we shall see , there exist inhomogeneous @xmath6-difference equations of degree @xmath31 and @xmath32 respectively . in a different direction ,
le used geometric methods of the kauffman bracket skein module and was able to prove the aj conjecture for most 2-bridge knots , as well as give a linear algebra algorithm that in principle computes the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial ; see ( * ? ? ?
* thm.1 ) and ( * ? ? ?
* sec.5.6.3 ) .
the algorithm was implemented in maple by the second author , but proved to be too slow to run for the @xmath28 and @xmath29 knots .
the main goal of the paper is to give an explicit formula for the non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial of twist knots with @xmath33 twists , where @xmath34 .
let us recall the _ twist knots _
@xmath35 for integer @xmath33 , shown in figure [ twist ] .
the planar projection of @xmath35 has @xmath36 crossings , @xmath37 of which come from @xmath33 full twists , and @xmath38 come from the negative _
clasp_. @xmath39 for small @xmath33 , these knots may be identified with ones from rolfsen s table ( see @xcite and @xcite ) as follows : @xmath40 @xmath41 let @xmath22 and @xmath23 denote the operators that act on a sequence @xmath42 of laurent polynomials @xmath43 $ ] by : @xmath44 note that @xmath45 .
let @xmath46 denote the _ inhomogeneous _ non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial of @xmath35 .
that is , @xmath47 is monic and minimal degree ( with respect to @xmath22 ) that satisfies the equation @xmath48 where @xmath49 . to convert the inhomogeneous equation above to a homogeneous one ,
see section [ sec.reviewct ] .
\(a ) for @xmath50 we have : @xmath51 ( b ) for @xmath52 we have : @xmath53 the formulas quickly become too lengthy to type . for more information ,
see appendix [ sec.p-33 ] for @xmath54 as well as the data file @xcite for @xmath34 .
theorem [ thm.0 ] gives a new proof of the aj - conjecture for twist knots with @xmath55 twists .
in section [ sec.strategy ] we outline the main strategy .
the idea is to use the recursion relation of the cyclotomic function @xmath56 of the twist knot @xmath35 ( from @xcite ) as well as a single - sum relation between @xmath57 and @xmath58 , together with some new ideas of creative telescoping and some guessing . in section [ sec.reviewct ]
we review the method of creative telescoping and in section [ sec.hybrid ] we present a multi - certificate version that takes into account the product of a hypergeometric summand with a @xmath6-holonomic one .
we conclude with three appendices : in appendix [ sec.gf ] we present an alternative method that uses generating functions ( that was kindly communicated to us by zeilberger ) . in appendix [ sec.p-33 ]
we give the non - commutative polynomial of twist knots @xmath35 for @xmath59 , and in appendix [ sec.acomm ] we give the @xmath0-polynomial of the same knots .
the authors wish to thank d. zeilberger for encouragement and enlightening conversations .
in this section we will describe our strategy to obtain a formula for @xmath60 .
* we consider the cyclotomic function @xmath61 $ ] introduced by habiro in @xcite , who used the notation @xmath62 . * the relation between the cyclotomic and the colored jones functions is given by : @xmath63 where the _ cyclotomic kernel _
@xmath3 is a proper @xmath6-hypergeometric term given for @xmath64 by : @xmath65 where @xmath66 and the _ quantum factorial _ is defined by : @xmath67 ( x ; q)_n = \
{ + [ cols= " < , < " , ] p. paule and a. riese , _ a mathematica @xmath6-analogue of zeilberger s algorithm based on an algebraically motivated approach to @xmath6-hypergeometric telescoping _ , in special functions , @xmath6-series and related topics , fields inst .
* 14 * ( 1997 ) 179210 .
|
purpose paper multivariable telescoping method problem quantum topology computation non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial of twist knots linear recursions for sums form @xmath1 recursion relation @xmath2 kernel @xmath3 theory implies recursion relation @xmath2 computation not manageable for twist knots no guarantee recursion relation minimal order method guarantee minimal recursion relation manageable produces minimal order recursion non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial for twist knots @xmath10 twists non commutative-polynomial encodes unique minimal order @xmath6-difference equation satisfied colored jones polynomials knot results proof aj - conjecture for knots recall relevant laurent polynomial invariants knots jones polynomial colored cousins 1985 v. jones introduced jones polynomial of knot @xmath11 3-space powerful knot invariant detects cheirality extended to sequence @xmath13 laurent polynomials parallels knot @xmath11 @xmath14 quantum group invariant of 0-framed knot @xmath15-dimensional representation @xmath16 normalized by @xmath17 detailed definition see @xcite normalization @xmath18 @xmath19 jones polynomial of @xmath11 given knot @xmath11 sequence laurent polynomials @xmath13 not random @xmath13 @xmath6-_holonomic satisfies linear @xmath6-difference equation depends knot coefficients @xmath20 proven @xcite @xmath21 finite multisum @xmath6-hypergeometric term state - sum definition colored jones function ultisums @xmath6-hypergeometric terms @xmath6-holonomic theory wilf - zeilberger @xmath6-holonomic sequence annihilated unique homogeneous linear @xmath6-difference equation smallest degree corresponding monic polynomial @xmath6-commuting variables @xmath22 @xmath23 invariant characteristic polynomial @xmath6-holonomic sequence define non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial @xmath24 of knot @xmath11 characteristic polynomial @xmath13 @xcite conjectured specialization @xmath25 of @xmath24 agree with @xmath0-polynomial knotlatter important invariant parametrizes @xmath26 character variety knot complement viewed from boundary torus detailed definition @xmath0-polynomial properties applications geometry topology see @xcite @xmath24 deformation of character variety jones polynomial of knot computable via skein theory with knots @xmath8 crossings see @xcite @xmath0-polynomial harder to compute unknown for knots with @xmath9 crossings two methods compute @xmath0-polynomial exact by boyd @xcite numerical culler @xcite non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial relation with @xmath0-polynomial knot important hyperbolic volume conjecture generalization explicit formulas for non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial explicit formula for torus knots in @xcite kauffman bracket skein module simplest hyperbolic @xmath27 knot @xcite single - sum formula colored jones function wz algorithm implemented see @xcite explicit state - sum formulas for colored jones function arbitrary planar projection @xcite obtain linear @xmath6-difference equation for colored jones function of arbitrary knottwo problems with approach summation variables in multisum formulas less than crossings @xmath6-multisum algorithms slow for current machines no guarantee @xmath6-multisum algorithms give minimal order linear @xmath6-difference equation many fail to give see @xcite for examples failure first problem unable to use sofware @xcite to compute @xmath6-difference equation for double sums problem ( b ) occurs for state - sums in knot theory problem knots @xmath28 and @xmath29 have double - sum formulas for colored jones function application of @xmath6-multisum package @xcite by takata in found inhomogeneous @xmath6-difference equation of degree @xmath30 inhomogeneous @xmath6-difference equations of degree @xmath31 and @xmath32 le used geometric methods of kauffman bracket skein module aj conjecture for most 2-bridge knots linear algebra algorithm computes non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial see.1 sec.5.6.3 algorithm implemented in maple too slow for @xmath28 and @xmath29 knotsgoal paper formula non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial twist knots @xmath33 twists recall twist knots @xmath35 integer @xmath33 figure planar projection @xmath35 has @xmath36 crossings @xmath37 from @xmath33 full twists @xmath38 negative clasp @xmath39 @xmath33 knots identified rolfsen s table @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath22 @xmath23 denote operators sequence @xmath42 laurent polynomials @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 inhomogeneous non - commutative @xmath0-polynomial @xmath35 @xmath47 monic minimal degree satisfies equation @xmath48 @xmath49 convert inhomogeneous equation homogeneous see section sec.reviewct @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 formulas lengthy see appendix [ sec.p-33 ] @xmath54 data file @xcite @xmath34 theorem.0 proof aj - conjecture twist knots with @xmath55 twists section sec.strategy main strategyidea use recursion relation cyclotomic function @xmath56 twist knot @xmath35 @xcite single - sum relation @xmath57 @xmath58 new ideas creative telescoping guessing section.reviewct review method creative telescoping.hybrid present multi - certificate version product hypergeometric summand @xmath6-holonomic one conclude three appendices appendix sec.gf alternative method generating functions communicated zeilberger appendix sec.p-33 non - commutative polynomial twist knots @xmath35 @xmath59 appendix sec.acomm @xmath0-polynomial same knots thank d. zeilberger encouragement conversations describe strategy obtain formula @xmath60 consider cyclotomic function @xmath61 introduced habiro @xcite notation @xmath62 relation cyclotomic colored jones functions given @xmath63 cyclotomic kernel @xmath3 @xmath6-hypergeometric term @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 quantum factorial defined @xmath67 ( x ; q)_n = \ p. paule a.riese mathematica-analogue zeilberger s algorithm algebraically approach-hypergeometric telescoping special functions-series related topics fields inst 14 1997 ) 179210
| 0.428076
| 2,542
| 1,383
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,795
|
after the completion of data taking at hera-2 , a large data set is at hand to study the photoproduction of charm and beauty quarks in @xmath0 collisions .
new measurements of charm production based on @xmath1 meson tagging and beauty production based on muon and electron reconstruction test perturbative qcd calculations with improved accuracy . in general , qcd calculations at nlo describe the data well .
the scale uncertainties are , however , large and dominate over the experimental uncertainties , calling for more precise calculations .
|
the study of charm and beauty production is a central topic of research at hera . in @xmath0 collisions , charm and beauty quarks
are predominantly produced by the photon gluon fusion process , which makes the production rates directly sensitive to the gluon density in the proton .
the mass of these heavy quarks provides a hard scale so that calculations in perturbative qcd are expected to be reliable .
however , this seemingly simple picture of photon gluon fusion with a hard scale given by the quark mass is considerably complicated by two issues : on one hand by the presence of additional hard scales such as the quark s transverse momentum , which means that heavy flavour production at hera is inherently a multi - scale problem ; on the other hand by the hadronic structure of the photon that leads to additional contributions such as flavour excitation , which pose additional challenges to theoretical calculations . while it is possible to take the stance that the theoretical issues are sufficiently well under control that one can infer from the measured charm and beauty production rates the gluon density of the proton , a complementary approach is to use the gluon density as determined from other processes , i.e. fits to inclusive structure function data , in particular from hera , and investigate the extent to which the formation of heavy quarks is theoretically understood in a rgime where multiple scales and qcd dynamics play an important rle . in the following , new measurements of charm and beauty production in photoproduction at hera will be presented .
photoproduction is characterized by a near zero virtuality and is driven by the detector acceptance for scattered electrons . ]
@xmath2 of the exchanged photon , which essentially behaves like a real photon .
to correct experimental data for detector effects , monte carlo generators based on leading order ( @xmath3 ) matrix elements and matched parton showers are used .
the pythia program @xcite is based on collinear factorization and dglap evolution of parton densities .
in contrast , cascade @xcite is based on the @xmath4 factorization ansatz , which uses a @xmath4 unintegrated gluon density that is evolved according to the ccfm evolution . for calculations at next to leading order
, the fmnr program @xcite , based on the calculation by nason , dawson and ellis @xcite , is available . in this program , which does not include parton showers , the fragmentation to hadrons is usually modelled using an independent fragmentation approach ; a new development is the fmnr @xmath5 pythia program @xcite , which augments fmnr with full lund string fragmentation .
the h1 collaboration has recently released a new measurement @xcite of charm photoproduction based on an integrated luminosity of @xmath6 of data taken at hera-2 .
charm events were tagged by the presence of a @xmath1 meson decaying in the golden decay channel @xmath7 , @xmath8 ( and charge conjugates ) .
the data were taken using a new trigger @xcite that allows a full mass reconstruction of the @xmath1 candidates at the third trigger level within @xmath9 .
the data covers a kinematic range defined by photon virtualities of @xmath10 and photon - proton centre of mass energies of @xmath11 .
the @xmath1 meson is measured for transverse momenta @xmath12 and pseudorapidities @xmath13 .
differential distributions in @xmath14 , @xmath15 and @xmath16 as well as double differential cross sections in @xmath14 and @xmath15 have been measured and compared to various qcd models .
in particular , two models at nlo qcd are available , namely fmnr and a recent calculation in the gm - vfns @xcite .
both models show similar behavour ( fig .
[ fig:1 ] ) : the @xmath14 spectrum is well described , with a slight deficiency at high @xmath17 in the case of the gm - vfns model , with sizeable uncertainties from scale variations , in particular at low @xmath17 .
when the @xmath15 spectrum is considered , the theoretical uncertainties are several times larger than the experimental ones ; nevertheless , both models show a tendency to fall below the data at large values of pseudorapidity .
a similar behavour is found in the deep - inelastic regime @xcite .
the measurement of beauty photoproduction at hera is difficult due to the fact that beauty production corresponds only to about @xmath18 of the total photoproduction cross section .
two basic techniques have been used to enrich beauty production events : the measurement of track impact parameters or secondary vertices , using a silicon vertex detector , which enrich beauty production due to the relatively large lifetime of beauty hadrons , and measurements based on leptons ( muons and/or electrons ) , which are based on the large semileptonic branching fraction of beauty hadrons . the h1 and zeus collaborations have recently released results from several analyses based on lepton tags .
two analyses , one from h1 @xcite and one from zeus @xcite , are based on samples with at least one muon and two jets in the final state ; in both cases , jet transverse momenta above @xmath19 are required .
the resulting samples are enriched to about @xmath20 of beauty events by the requirement of two high-@xmath17 jets in conjunction with a highly energetic muon .
the actual fraction of beauty events is then determined from fits to the distribution of the impact parameter @xmath21 of the muon track and the relative transverse momentum @xmath22 of the muon with respect to the nearest jet axis . in these measurements ,
the @xmath22 distribution allows the separation of beauty induced events from those of light ( uds ) and charm quarks with good precision ; the impact parameter distribution on the other hand allows in addition the separation of light and charm quark induced events and thus serves not only as a cross check of the @xmath22 based measurement , but also helps to reduce the systematic uncertainty which would otherwise be incurred by the uncertainty of the charm quark contribution to the @xmath22 spectrum . both measurements cover a range of @xmath23 in inelasticity , momentum transfer @xmath24 , muon transverse momentum @xmath25 and jet pseudorapidity @xmath26 ; however , the zeus data cover a range @xmath27 of muon pseudorapidities , while the h1 analysis is restricted to @xmath28 .
the zeus analysis is based on @xmath29 of data taken in 2004 and 2005 , while the h1 result uses @xmath30 of data from the years 2006 and 2007 .
both analyses show good agreement with perturbative qcd calculations performed with the fmnr program , after corrections for hadronisation effects have been applied to the fmnr predictions , which are available only at parton level .
the excess of data over nlo predictions at low values of jet and muon transverse momenta that was reported in an earlier h1 analysis of hera-1 data @xcite and was in disagreement with zeus data @xcite , is not confirmed by the new h1 analysis .
zeus has also published a new measurement based on events with semileptonic decays to electrons @xcite . in this analysis ,
events with two jets of @xmath31 and at least one electron are selected from @xmath32 of data taken at hera-1 .
the beauty contribution was determined from a fit to a likelihood variable based on quantities that are sensitive to the quality of electron identification , such as the specific ionisation @xmath33 , as well as quantities that allow the separation between electrons from light quark or charm induced processes from bottom production .
these quantities are again @xmath34 , and @xmath35 , the azimuthal angle difference between the electron flight direction and the direction of the total missing transverse momentum . again
, reasonable agreement with the nlo qcd calculation fmnr is observed , for the total cross section as well as differential distributions .
r0.5 an upcoming publication by zeus @xcite is based on @xmath36 of data taken at hera-1 and utilizes events with two muons in the final state .
contrary to other work discussed here , no jet requirement is imposed in the selection , which is possible due to the high beauty fraction of a dilepton sample , and the analysis is performed down to muon transverse momenta of @xmath37 , or even @xmath38 for high - quality muon candidates .
the analysis is thus sensitive down to to the threshold of beauty production , where the transverse momentum of the beauty quarks is close to zero .
therefore a measurement of the total beauty production cross section is possible with relatively small extrapolation errors .
the total cross section for the process @xmath39 at @xmath40 has been determined to be @xmath41 , to be compared to the nlo qcd prediction of @xmath42 . within the large uncertainties ,
in particular of the nlo calculation , the nlo prediction is consistent with the data .
[ fig:2 ] summarizes all currently available beauty photoproduction measurements at hera , in comparison to the qcd prediction at nlo .
it can be seen that nlo qcd describes the data well in shape and normalization , albeit with rather large uncertainties , which are dominated by the choice of scale .
note that for this plot the central value of the qcd prediction is derived for a choice of @xmath43 for the renormalization and factorization scales @xcite , while the individual measurements sometimes use twice this value , i.e. @xmath44 for the central value .
the study of the photoproduction of charm and beauty quarks at hera remains a challenging testing ground for perturbative qcd . with the increased statistical precision provided by the hera-2 data set , and improved detector understanding that results in more precise measurements from hera-1 , measurements of charm and beauty production are now available with experimental uncertainties that are significantly smaller than the theoretical uncertainties of qcd calculations , even at next to leading order .
using gluon densities based on fits to inclusive structure function measurements , these calculations in general describe the data reasonably well in shape and normalization , which is a great success of perturbative qcd .
however , differential distributions such as the @xmath45 distribution of @xmath1 mesons indicate deficiencies in the calculations which may need further work to resolve .
t. sjstrand _ et al .
_ , comput .
commun .
* 135 * ( 2001 ) 238 [ hep - ph/0010017 ] .
h. jung and g. p. salam , eur .
j. c * 19 * ( 2001 ) 351 [ hep - ph/0012143 ] ; + h. jung , comput .
commun .
* 143 * ( 2002 ) 100 [ hep - ph/0109102 ] .
m. l. mangano , p. nason and g. ridolfi , nucl .
b * 373 * ( 1992 ) 295 - 345 ; + s. frixione , m. l. mangano , p. nason and g. ridolfi , nucl .
b * 412 * ( 1994 ) 225 - 259 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9306337 ] ; + s. frixione , p. nason and g. ridolfi , nucl .
b * 454 * ( 1995 ) 3 [ hep - ph/9506226 ] .
p. nason , s. dawson and r. k. ellis , nucl .
b * 303 * ( 1988 ) 607 ; + _ idem , _ nucl .
b * 327 * ( 1989 ) 49 [ erratum - ibid .
b * 335 * ( 1990 ) 260 ] ; + r. k. ellis and p. nason , nucl .
b * 312 * ( 1989 ) 551 .
a. geiser and a. e. nuncio quiroz , arxiv:0707.1632 [ hep - ph ] .
h1 collaboration , _ measurement of @xmath1 meson production in photoproduction , _
h1prelim-08 - 073 , http://www-h1.desy.de/h1/www/publications/htmlsplit/h1prelim-08-073.long.html ; + k. urban , phd thesis univ .
heidelberg , in preparation .
a. schning [ h1 collaboration ] , nucl .
instrum .
meth . a * 518 * ( 2004 ) 542 .
g. kramer and h. spiesberger , eur .
j. c * 38 * ( 2004 ) 309 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0311062 ] ; + b. a. kniehl _ et al .
_ , phys .
d * 71 * ( 2005 ) 014018 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0410289 ] ; + h. spiesberger , private communication .
h1 collaboration , _ a measurement of beauty photoproduction through decays to muons and jets at hera - ii , _
h1prelim-08 - 071 , http://www-h1.desy.de/h1/www/publications/htmlsplit/h1prelim-08-071.long.html ; + m. krmer , phd thesis univ .
hamburg , in preparation .
a. aktas _ et al .
_ [ h1 collaboration ] , eur .
j. c * 41 * ( 2005 ) 453 [ arxiv : hep - ex/0502010 ] .
s. chekanov _ et al . _
[ zeus collaboration ] , phys .
d * 70 * ( 2004 ) 012008 [ erratum - ibid .
d * 74 * ( 2006 ) 059906 ] [ arxiv : hep - ex/0312057 ] .
s. chekanov _ et al . _
[ zeus collaboration ] , arxiv:0805.4390 [ hep - ex ] .
s. chekanov _ et al . _
[ zeus collaboration ] , _ measurement of beauty production using dimuon events with zeus at hera , _
desy-08 - 128 .
|
study of charm beauty production central at hera in @xmath0 collisions charm beauty quarks produced by photon gluon fusion production rates sensitive to gluon density proton mass heavy quarks provides hard scale calculations in perturbative qcd reliable fusion quark mass complicated by issues additional hard scales quark transverse momentum heavy flavour production multi - scale problem hadronic structure photon additional contributions flavour excitation challenges to theoretical calculations infer from charm beauty production rates gluon density proton complementary approach use gluon density determined from other processes structure function data hera investigate formation of heavy quarks in multiple scales qcd dynamics new measurements of charm beauty production in photoproduction at hera presented photoproduction near zero virtuality driven by detector acceptance for scattered electrons exchanged photon like real photon to correct experimental data for detector effects monte carlo generators based on leading order @xmath3 ) matrix elements matched parton showers used pythia program @xcite based on collinear factorization dglap evolution of parton densitiescascade @xcite based on @xmath4 factorization ansatz unintegrated gluon density evolved ccfm evolution calculations fmnr program @xcite nason dawson ellis available parton showers fragmentation to hadrons modelled independent approach new fmnr @xmath5 pythia program augments fmnr with full lund string fragmentation h1 collaboration released measurement of charm photoproduction integrated luminosity @xmath6 hera-2 charm events @xmath1 meson decaying in golden decay channel @xmath7 data taken new trigger @xcite full mass reconstruction @xmath1 candidates third trigger level @xmath9 data covers kinematic range photon virtualities - proton centre mass energies @xmath1 meson measured for transverse momenta pseudorapidities @xmath13 differential distributions in @xmath14 double differential cross sections measured compared to qcd models two models at nlo qcd available fmnr recent calculation gm - vfns @xcite show similar behavourfig:1 @xmath14 spectrum described deficiency at high @xmath17 gm - vfns model uncertainties from scale variations low @xmath17 @xmath15 spectrum theoretical uncertainties larger than experimental both models fall below data at large values pseudorapidity similar behavour in deep - inelastic regime @xcite measurement beauty photoproduction at hera difficult corresponds to @xmath18 total photoproduction cross section two techniques enrich beauty production measurement track impact parameters silicon vertex detector large lifetime beauty hadrons measurements based on leptons muons electrons large semileptonic branching fraction beauty hadrons h1 zeus collaborations released results analyses lepton tags two analyses based on samples one muon two jets state jet transverse momenta above @xmath19 required samples enriched @xmath20 beauty events two high-@xmath17 jets highly energetic muon actual fraction of beauty events determined from impact parameter @xmath21 muon track relative transverse momentum @xmath22 muon nearest jet axis@xmath22 distribution allows beauty events from light charm quarks impact parameter distribution allows separation light charm quark induced events cross check measurement systematic uncertainty charm quark contribution measurements cover @xmath23 inelasticity momentum transfer muon transverse momentum jet pseudorapidity @xmath26 zeus data cover @xmath27 muon pseudorapidities h1 analysis restricted to @xmath28 zeus analysis based on @xmath29 data 2004 2005 h1 uses @xmath30 data 2006 2007 analyses show agreement with perturbative qcd calculations fmnr program after corrections for hadronisation effects applied to predictions parton level excess of data over nlo predictions at low values jet muon transverse momenta reported in earlier h1 analysis not confirmed by new h1 analysis zeus published new measurement based on events semileptonic decays to electrons @xcite events with two jets of @xmath31 one electron selected from @xmath32 data hera-1 beauty contribution determined from likelihood variable based on quantities sensitive to quality electron identification separation between electrons from light quark charm induced processesquantities are @xmath34 @xmath35 azimuthal angle difference between electron flight direction missing transverse momentum agreement with nlo qcd calculation for total cross section differential distributions upcoming publication by zeus based on @xmath36 data at hera-1 events with two muons final state no jet requirement selection high beauty fraction dilepton sample analysis to muon transverse momenta @xmath37 or @xmath38 for high - quality candidates analysis sensitive to threshold beauty production transverse momentum close to zero measurement total beauty production cross section possible with small extrapolation errors total cross section for @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 compared to nlo qcd prediction of @xmath42 nlo prediction consistent with data fig:2 summarizes beauty photoproduction measurements at hera qcd prediction nlo nlo qcd describes data with large uncertainties dominated by choice of scale central value qcd prediction derived for @xmath43 for renormalization factorization scales measurements use twice @xmath44 for study photoproduction of charm beauty quarks at hera challenging for perturbative qcdincreased statistical precision hera-2 data set improved detector understanding precise measurements hera-1 measurements charm beauty production experimental uncertainties smaller theoretical uncertainties qcd calculations gluon densities structure function measurements calculations describe data shape normalization success perturbative qcd differential distributions @xmath45 @xmath1 indicate deficiencies work t sjstrand et al comput commun 135 * 2001 ) 238 hep - ph/0010017 ] h. jung g. p. salam 19 2001 ) 351 hep - ph/0012143 ] h. jung 143 2002 ) 100 hep - ph/0109102 ] m. l. mangano p. nason g. ridolfi nucl 373 * 1992 ) 295 -. frixione ridolfi 412 1994 ) 225 - 259 hep - ph/9306337 ] ridolfi 454 1995 ) 3 hep - ph/9506226 ] p. nason s. dawson r. k. ellis nucl 303 * ( 1988 ) 607 idem 327 1989 ) 49 335 1990 ) 260 r. k. ellis p. nason nucl312 1989 ) 551 geiser nuncio quiroz arxiv:0707.1632 hep - ph h1 collaboration measurement @xmath1 meson production photoproduction h1prelim-08 - 073-h1.desy.de k. urban phd thesis univ heidelberg schning h1 collaboration instrum 518 2004 ) 542 kramer h. spiesberger j 38 * 2004 ) 309 arxiv hep - ph/0311062 a kniehl al . d * 71 2005 ) 014018 arxiv hep - ph/0410289 h. spiesberger private communication h1 collaboration measurement beauty photoproduction decays muons jets hera - ii h1prelim-08 - 071 m. krmer phd thesis univ hamburg aktas h1 collaboration 41 2005 ) 453 arxiv hep - ex/0502010 chekanov zeus collaboration phys . d * 70 * ( 2004 ) 012008 74 2006 ) 059906 arxiv hep - ex/0312057 chekanov zeus collaboration arxiv:0805.4390 hep - exzeus collaboration measurement beauty production dimuon events zeus desy-08 128
| 0.499581
| 3,144
| 1,593
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,801
|
i discuss the possibility of production of high energy cosmic tau neutrinos ( @xmath0 gev ) in an astrophysical site and study some of the effects of neutrino mixing on their subsequent propagation .
i also discuss the prospects for observations of these high energy cosmic tau neutrinos through double shower events in new km@xmath1 surface area under water / ice neutrino telescopes .
|
in this contribution i discuss the possibility of production of high energy cosmic tau neutrinos ( @xmath0 gev ) in cores of active galactic nuclei ( agn ) originating from proton acceleration .
the effects of three flavour neutrino mixing on this high energy cosmic tau neutrino flux and the prospects for its observations through double shower events @xcite .
in addition to agns , high energy cosmic tau neutrinos may also be produced in several currently envisaged other cosmologically distant astrophysical sources @xcite .
for some possible effects of neutrino mixing other than the flavour one on high energy cosmic tau neutrino flux , see @xcite . for prospects of observations of high energy cosmic tau neutrinos other than the double shower technique , see @xcite .
the present study is particularly useful as several under water / ice high energy neutrino telescopes are now at their rather advanced stages of development and deployment @xcite .
i start in section 2 with a brief description of possibility of production of high energy cosmic tau neutrinos relative to electron and muon neutrinos and discuss in some detail the effect of three flavour neutrino mixing on their subsequent propagation and further discuss the prospects for their detection through double shower events . in section 3
, i summarize the results .
high energy cosmic tau neutrinos may either mainly be produced in @xmath2 or in @xmath3 collisions in a cosmologically distant environment . in @xmath2 collisions ,
high energy @xmath4 and @xmath5 are mainly produced through the resonant reaction @xmath6 .
the same collisions will give rise to a greatly suppressed high energy @xmath7 ( and @xmath8 ) flux ( @xmath9 ) mainly through the reaction @xmath10 .
in @xmath11 collisions , the @xmath7 flux may be obtained through @xmath12 . the relatively small cross - section for @xmath13 production together with the low branching ratio into @xmath7 implies that the @xmath7 flux in @xmath11 collisions is also suppressed up to 5 orders of magnitude relative to @xmath4 and/or @xmath5 fluxes .
thus , both in @xmath2 and in @xmath11 collisions , the intrinsically produced tau neutrino flux is expected to be rather quite small , typically a factor less than @xmath14 relative to electron and muon neutrino fluxes @xcite .
matter effects on vacuum neutrino flavour oscillations are relevant if @xmath15 . using @xmath16 given in ref .
@xcite , it follows that matter effects are absent for @xmath17 ev@xmath1 .
matter effects are not expected to be important in the neutrino production regions around agn and will not be further discussed here . in the framework of three flavour analysis ,
the flavour precession probability from @xmath18 to @xmath19 neutrino flavour is @xcite @xmath20 where @xmath21 or @xmath22 .
@xmath23 is the 3@xmath243 mns mixing matrix and will be used in usual notation with the standard parameterization for vanishing @xmath25 and cp violating phase @xcite . in eq .
( 1 ) , @xmath26 with @xmath27 and @xmath28 is the distance between the source and the detector .
currently , the atmospheric muon and solar electron neutrino deficits can be explained with oscillations among three active neutrinos @xcite . for this , typically , @xmath29 ev@xmath1 and @xmath30 for the explanation of atmospheric muon neutrino deficit , whereas for the explanation of solar electron neutrino deficit , we may have @xmath31 ev@xmath1 and @xmath30 [ just so solution ] or @xmath32 ev@xmath1 and @xmath33 [ sma ( msw ) ] or @xmath32 ev@xmath1 and @xmath30 [ lma ( msw ) ] . in the above explanations ,
the total range of @xmath34 is @xmath35 ev@xmath36 irrespective of neutrino flavour .
the typical energy span relevant for possible flavour identification for high energy cosmic neutrinos is @xmath37gev@xmath38 in which currently the neutrino flux from cores of agns dominate .
taking a typical distance between the agn and our galaxy as @xmath39 mpc ( where 1 pc @xmath40 m ) , the @xmath41 term in eq .
( 1 ) vanishes and so eq . ( 1 ) reduces to @xmath42 it is assumed here that no relatively dense objects exist between the agn and the earth so as to effect significantly this oscillations pattern .
the @xmath43 in eq .
( 2 ) is independent of not only @xmath34 but also @xmath44 .
let me denote by @xmath45 , the intrinsic high energy cosmic neutirno fluxes .
for simplicity , i take their ratios as @xmath46 . in order to estimate the final flux ratios on earth ,
let me introduce a 3@xmath243 matrix of vacuum flavour precession probabilities such that @xmath47 the explicit form for the matrix @xmath48 in case of just so flavour oscillations as solution to solar neutrino problem along with the solution to atmospheric neutrino deficit in terms of @xmath5 to @xmath7 oscillations with maximal depth is @xmath49 using eq . ( 4 ) and eq .
( 3 ) , we note that @xmath50 at the level of @xmath51 .
also , the unitarity conditions for @xmath52 are satisfied .
the same flux ratio is obtained in remaining two cases .
thus , essentially independent of the oscillation solution for solar neutrino problem , i have @xmath53 .
this provides some prospects for possible detection of high energy cosmic tau neutrinos .
the down ward going high energy cosmic tau neutrinos reaching close to the surface of the detector may undergo a charged current deep inelastic scattering with nuclei inside / near the detector and produce a tau lepton in addition to a hadronic shower .
this tau lepton traverses a distance , on average proportional to its energy , before it decays back into a tau neutrino and a second shower most often induced by decay hadrons .
the second shower is expected to carry about twice as much energy as the first and such double shower signals are commonly referred to as a double bangs . as tau leptons are not expected to have further relevant interactions ( with high energy loss ) in their decay time scale , the two showers should be separated by a clean @xmath54-like track @xcite .
= 2.5 in = 2.5 in the calculation of down ward going contained but separable double shower event rate for a typical km@xmath1 surface area under water / ice neutrino telescope can be carried out by replacing the muon range expression with the tauon one and then subtracting it from the linear size of a typical high energy neutrino telescope in the event rate formula while using the expected @xmath7 flux spectrum given by eq .
( 3 ) . here
, i confine myself by mentioning that the expected number of contained but separable double showers induced by down ward going high energy cosmic tau neutrinos for @xmath55 gev may be @xmath56/yr@xmath57sr , essentially irrespective of solution of solar neutrino problem , if one uses the @xmath51 from ref . @xcite as an example . at this energy ,
the two showers initiated by the down ward going high energy cosmic tau neutrinos are well separated ( see fig .
1 ) such that the amplitude of the second shower is essentially 2 times the first shower .
intrinsically , the flux of high energy cosmic tau neutrinos is quite small , typically being @xmath58 from , for instance , cosmologically distant cores of active galactic nuclei . \2 .
because of vacuum neutrino flavour oscillations , this ratio can be greatly enhanced . in the context of three flavour neutrino mixing scheme which can accomodate the oscillation solutions to solar and atmospheric neutrino deficits , the final flux ratio of high energy cosmic neutrinos on earth is @xmath59 .
this enhancement in high energy cosmic tau neutrino flux may lead to the possibility of its detection in km@xmath1 surface area under water / ice high energy neutrino telescopes . for @xmath60/gev @xmath38 , the down ward going high energy cosmic tau neutrinos may produce a double shower signature because of charged current deep inelastic scattering followed by a subsequent hadronic decay of associated tau lepton .
i thank japan society for the promotion of science ( jsps ) for financial support .
9 j. g. learned and s. pakvasa , astropart .
phys . 3 ( 1995 ) 267 .
see , e. waxman ; v. berezinsky ; p. l. biermann and g. sigl in these proceedings .
athar husain , nucl .
b ( proc . suppl . )
76 ( 1999 ) 419 and references cited therein .
for a recent discussion , see , s. iyer , m. h. reno and i. sarcevic , hep - ph/9909393 and references cited therein .
l. moscoso , these proceedings .
a some what detailed numerical study supports this order of magnitude estimate ; h. athar , r. a. vzquez and e. zas ( in preparation ) .
a. p. szabo and r. j. protheroe , astropart .
phys . 2 ( 1994 ) 375 .
ta - pei cheng and ling - fong li ( eds . ) , gauge theory of elementary particle physics , claredon press , oxford , 1984 , p. 411 . c. caso et al .
, the euro . phys .
j. c3 ( 1998 ) 103 .
m. nakahata , these proceedings .
athar , g. parente and e. zas ( to be submitted ) .
see also scanned transperacies by athar husain at url http://taup99.in2p3.fr / taup99/.
|
production high energy cosmic tau neutrinos @xmath0 in active galactic nuclei from proton acceleration effects three flavour neutrino mixing flux prospects observations through double shower events high energy neutrinos produced in distant astrophysical sources effects neutrino mixing flux see @xcite prospects observations other double shower see @xcite study useful under water / ice high energy neutrino telescopes at advanced stages development deployment start section 2 description production high energy cosmic tau neutrinos electron muon neutrinos effect three flavour neutrino mixing on propagation prospects detection through double shower events section 3 summarize results high energy cosmic tau neutrinos produced in @xmath2 or @xmath3 collisions distant environment @xmath2 collisions high energy @xmath4 and @xmath5 produced through resonant reaction @xmath6 collisions suppressed high energy @xmath7 @xmath8 flux @xmath9 through reaction @xmath10 @xmath11 collisions @xmath7 flux obtained through @xmath12small cross - section @xmath13 production low branching ratio @xmath7 flux in @xmath11 collisions suppressed 5 orders fluxes @xmath2 @xmath11 collisions tau neutrino flux small less than @xmath14 electron muon neutrino fluxes matter effects on vacuum neutrino flavour oscillations relevant @xmath15 matter effects absent for @xmath17@xmath1 not important in neutrino production regions around agn analysis flavour precession probability from @xmath18 to @xmath19 neutrino flavour is @xcite @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath23 3@xmath243 mns mixing matrix used parameterization vanishing @xmath25 violating phase @xcite @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 distance between source detector atmospheric muon solar electron neutrino deficits explained with oscillations among three active neutrinos@xmath29@xmath1 @xmath30 atmospheric muon neutrino deficit solar electron neutrino deficit @xmath31@xmath1 @xmath30 @xmath32@xmath1 @xmath33 sma msw @xmath32 @xmath30 lma total range @xmath34 @xmath35 ev@xmath36 irrespective neutrino flavour typical energy span flavour identification high energy cosmic neutrinos @xmath37gev@xmath38 neutrino flux from cores agns dominate typical distance agn galaxy @xmath39 mpc 1 pc @xmath40 m ) @xmath41 term vanishes reduces to @xmath42 no dense objects between agn earth oscillations pattern @xmath43 independent of @xmath34 @xmath44 @xmath45 high energy cosmic neutirno fluxes ratios as @xmath46 estimate final flux ratios earth 3@xmath243 matrix vacuum flavour precession probabilities @xmath47 form matrix @xmath48 flavour oscillations solution solar neutrino problem atmospheric neutrino deficit @xmath5 to @xmath7 oscillations maximal depth @xmath49 eq . 4 )@xmath50 level of @xmath51 unitarity conditions for @xmath52 satisfied same flux ratio remaining two cases independent of oscillation solution solar neutrino problem @xmath53 prospects detection high energy cosmic tau neutrinos down ward high energy tau neutrinos surface detector undergo charged current scattering produce tau lepton hadronic shower tau lepton traverses distance proportional to energy before decays into tau neutrino second shower induced by decay hadrons second shower twice energy first double shower signals double bangs tau leptons interactions decay two showers separated by clean @xmath54-like track @xcite = 2.5 calculation of separable double shower event rate typical km@xmath1 surface area water ice neutrino telescope replacing muon range expression with tauon one subtracting from linear size high energy neutrino telescope event rate formula using expected @xmath7 flux spectrum expected number of separable double showers by high energy tau neutrinos for @xmath55 may be @xmath56/yr@xmath57sr irrespective of solution solar neutrino problem @xmath51 from @xcite exampleenergy two showers by high energy tau neutrinos separated fig . 1 amplitude second shower 2 times first flux high energy tau neutrinos small typically @xmath58 from distant active galactic nuclei vacuum neutrino flavour oscillations ratio enhanced three flavour neutrino mixing scheme solar atmospheric final flux ratio high neutrinos on earth @xmath59 enhancement flux detection in@xmath1 surface area under water / ice telescopes neutrinos produce double shower signature charged current scattering hadronic decay of tau lepton thank japan society promotion science for financial support j. g. learned s. pakvasa , astropart . . 3 ( 1995 ) 267 e. waxman v. berezinsky p. l. biermann g. sigl athar husain, nucl . b suppl. ) 76 ( 1999 ) 419 references discussion see s. iyer m. h. reno i. sarcevic hep - ph/9909393 l. moscoso proceedings detailed numerical study supports magnitude estimate athar r a. vzquez e. zas preparationszabo protheroe astropart phys 2 1994 ) 375 ta - pei cheng ling - fong li gauge theory elementary particle physics claredon press oxford 1984 p. 411 caso euro c3 1998 ) 103 nakahata proceedings athar parente zas submitted scanned transperacies athar husain http://taup99.in2p3.fr
| 0.349638
| 2,204
| 1,156
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,802
|
acceleration of high - energy hadrons in grb blast waves will be established if high - energy neutrinos are detected from grbs .
recent calculations of photomeson neutrino production are reviewed , and new calculations of high - energy neutrinos and the accompanying hadronic cascade radiation are presented . if hadrons are injected in grb blast waves with an energy corresponding to the measured hard x - ray / soft @xmath0-ray emission , then only the most powerful bursts at fluence levels @xmath1 offer a realistic prospect for detection of @xmath2 .
detection of high - energy neutrinos are likely if grb blast waves have large baryon loads and doppler factors @xmath3 .
significant limitations on the hadronic baryon loading and the number of expected neutrinos are imposed by the fluxes from pair - photon cascades initiated in the same processes that produce neutrinos .
address = centre de recherche mathmatiques , universit de montral , montral , canada h3c
3j7 address = code 7653 , naval research laboratory , washington , dc 20375 - 5352 usa
|
in recent work @xcite , we considered neutrino production for two leading scenarios for the sources that power long - duration grbs , namely the collapsar @xcite and supranova ( sa ) @xcite models . in the collapsar model ,
the core of a massive star collapses directly to a black hole , and the most important radiation field for photomeson neutrino production is the internal synchrotron radiation field @xcite . in the supranova ( sa ) model ,
a pulsar nebula synchrotron radiation within an expanding supernova remnant ( snr ) shell @xcite provides additional external photon target for photomeson interactions ( see also refs .
@xcite ) .
we found that the presence of the external field in the sa model can increase the number of detectable neutrinos by an order of magnitude or more over the collapsar model when the doppler factor @xmath4 .
when @xmath5 , the internal synchrotron field can become effective for photomeson interactions . in our calculations , we assumed that the energy injected in protons is equal to the energy of electrons producing the photon fluence measured at x - ray and @xmath0-ray energies . in both models ,
the likelihood of detecting a neutrino from a grb with a km - scale detector such as icecube is small except for rare grbs with fluence @xmath6 .
if grb blast waves are strongly baryon - loaded , however , as required in a grb model for high - energy cosmic rays @xcite , then we predict that 100 tev
100 pev neutrinos will be detected several times per year with icecube when @xmath5 .
here we summarize our calculations of photomeson neutrino production for the collapsar and sa models , and present new calculations for the hadronic cascade radiation from a grb .
the grb model is adapted from our photo - hadronic model for blazar jets @xcite , and takes into account the injection of nonthermal protons which lose energy through photomeson interactions .
protons are injected with a number spectrum @xmath7 at comoving proton energies @xmath8 gev up to a maximum proton energy determined by the condition that the particle larmor radius is smaller than both the size scale of the emitting region and the photomeson energy - loss length . here
@xmath9 is the lorentz factor of the blast wave . the observed synchrotron spectral flux in the prompt phase of the burst is parameterized by the expression @xmath10 , where @xmath11 kev , @xmath12 above @xmath13 and an exponential cutoff at 10 mev , and @xmath14 when @xmath15 .
at lower energies , @xmath16 . the observed total hard x - ray / soft @xmath0-ray photon fluence @xmath17 , where @xmath18 is the characteristic duration of the grb .
we consider a source at redshift @xmath19 and take the hard x - ray / soft @xmath0-ray fluence @xmath20 .
two or three grbs should occur each month above this fluence level .
a total amount of energy @xmath21 is injected in the form of accelerated proton energy into the comoving frame of the grb blast wave . here
@xmath22 is the redshift and @xmath23 is the luminosity distance .
the energy deposited into each of @xmath24 light - curve pulses ( or spikes ) is therefore @xmath25 ergs .
we assume that all the energy @xmath26 is injected in the first half of the time interval of the pulse ( to ensure variability in the grb light curve ) , which effectively corresponds to a characteristic variability time scale @xmath27 .
the proper width of the radiating region forming the pulse is @xmath28 , from which the energy density of the synchrotron radiation can be determined @xcite .
we set the grb prompt duration @xmath29s , and let @xmath30 , corresponding to @xmath31 .
the magnetic field is determined by assuming equipartition between the energy densities of the magnetic field and the electron energy . for the sa model
, we assume the existence of an external radiation field given by the expression @xmath32 , with @xmath33 kev @xcite .
the intensity of this field is determined by the assumption that the integral power @xmath34 is equal to the power of the pulsar wind @xmath35 , assuming that a total of @xmath36 of pulsar rotation energy is radiated during the time @xmath37 ( which is here set equal to 0.1 yr ) from the rotating supramassive neutron star before it collapses to a black hole .
the energy @xmath38 is the characteristic energy of synchrotron radiation emitted by electrons ( of the pulsar wind ) with lorentz factors @xmath39 in a randomly ordered magnetic field of strength @xmath40 g. the radius @xmath41 is determined by assuming that @xmath42 is the mean speed of the snr shell , and that the external photon energy density @xmath43 .
1 shows the total @xmath2 fluences expected from a model grb with @xmath44 pulses .
the thin curves show collapsar model results at @xmath45 200 , and 300 , with @xmath46 .
the expected numbers of @xmath2 that a km - scale detector such as icecube would detect are @xmath47 , @xmath48 , and @xmath49 , respectively .
there is no prospect to detect @xmath2 from grbs at these levels .
the heavy solid and dashed curves in fig . 1 give the sa model predictions of @xmath50 for both @xmath51 and @xmath52 .
the equipartition magnetic fields are 1.9 kg and 0.25 kg , respectively .
the external radiation field in the sa model makes the neutrino detection rate insensitive to the value of @xmath53 ( as well as to @xmath54 , as verified by calculations ) , but there is still little hope that a km@xmath55 detector could detect such grbs .
neutrino production efficiency would improve by at most a factor of 3 in the collapsar model if @xmath56ms ( and @xmath57 to provide the same total fluence ) .
such narrow spikes are , however , then nearly opaque to @xmath0 rays with energies @xmath58 mev @xcite . even in this case , there is little hope to detect neutrinos except from rare grbs with fluence @xmath59 . for a model grb with hard x - ray fluence @xmath60 for different doppler factors @xmath53 .
the thin curves show collapsar model results where only the internal synchrotron radiation field provides a source of target photons . ]
2 shows new calculations of photomeson neutrino production for a grb with @xmath61 and @xmath51 , as well as the accompanying electromagnetic radiation induced by pair - photon cascades from the secondary electrons and @xmath0 rays from the same photomeson interactions .
the total number of @xmath2 expected with icecube is @xmath62 .
the total fluence of cascade photons shown here is contributed by lepton synchrotron ( dot - dashed ) and compton ( dashed ) emissions . for comparison ,
the dotted curve shows the primary lepton synchrotron radiation spectrum assumed for the calculations .
the level of the fluence of the cascade photons is @xmath40% of the primary synchrotron radiation .
this means that the maximum allowed baryon loading for these parameters can not exceed a factor of @xmath63 in order not to overproduce the primary synchrotron radiation fluence .
this limits the maximum number of @xmath2 to @xmath64 even in the case of large baryon loading for rare , powerful grbs .
these numbers can not be further increased in the sa model because of the efficient extraction that is already provided by internal photons alone for these parameters . and @xmath51 .
the dotted curve shows the fluence of a grb used for calculations , and the dashed and dot - dashed curves show the compton and synchrotron contributions to the photon fluence from the electromagnetic cascade initiated by secondaries from photomeson processes , respectively . , width=415 ] in conclusion , we predict that at most a few high - energy @xmath2 can be detected with icecube even from a very bright grb at the fluence level @xmath65 , and only when the baryon loading is high @xcite .
this is because the detection of a single @xmath2 requires a @xmath2 fluence @xmath66 above 1 tev .
since the energy release in high - energy neutrinos and electromagnetic secondaries is about equal , this energy will be reprocessed in the pair - photon cascade and emerge in the form of observable radiation at hard x - ray / soft @xmath0-ray energies , and this radiation can not exceed the measured fluence in this regime .
this imposes a robust limit on the maximum number of @xmath2 even from a grb with very high baryon loading .
aa thanks the nrl high energy space environment branch for support and hospitality during visits .
the work of cd is supported by the office of naval research and nasa glast science investigation grant dpr # s-15634-y .
|
recent work considered neutrino production for two scenarios grbs collapsar supranova models collapsar model core massive star collapses to black hole important radiation field for neutrino production internal synchrotron radiation supranova model pulsar nebula synchrotron radiation expanding supernova remnant shell provides external photon target for photomeson interactions external field in sa model detectable neutrinos over collapsar model internal synchrotron field effective for photomeson interactions assumed energy injected in protons equal to energy electrons producing photon fluence at x - ray-ray energies models likelihood of detecting neutrino from grb with km - scale detector icecube small except for rare grbs with fluence @xmath6 if grb blast waves strongly baryon - loaded predict 100 pev neutrinos detected several times per year with icecube summarize calculations of photomeson neutrino production for collapsar sa models new calculations for hadronic cascade radiation from grb grb model adapted from model injection of nonthermal protons lose energy through photomeson interactionsprotons injected spectrum @xmath7 energies @xmath8 gev maximum energy determined particle larmor radius smaller size emitting region photomeson energy - loss length @xmath9 lorentz factor blast wave synchrotron spectral flux prompt phase burst parameterized @xmath10 kev @xmath12 @xmath13 cutoff 10 mev @xmath14 @xmath15 lower energies @xmath16 hard x - ray soft-ray photon fluence @xmath17 @xmath18 characteristic duration grb source redshift @xmath19 ray-ray fluence @xmath20 two or three grbs month above fluence level energy @xmath21 injected accelerated proton energy frame grb blast wave @xmath22 redshift @xmath23 luminosity distance energy deposited @xmath24 light - curve pulses @xmath25 ergs energy @xmath26 injected first half time interval pulse variability grb light curve corresponds characteristic variability time scale @xmath27 width radiating region @xmath28 energy density synchrotron radiation determined set grb prompt duration @xmath29s @xmath30 @xmath31.magnetic field determined between energy densities electron energy external radiation field @xmath32 @xmath33 kev @xcite intensity determined integral power @xmath34 equal to pulsar wind @xmath35 @xmath36 pulsar rotation energy radiated @xmath37 0.1 yr from rotating neutron star before black hole energy @xmath38 synchrotron radiation pulsar wind lorentz factors @xmath39 magnetic field strength @xmath40 g radius @xmath41 determined @xmath42 mean speed snr shell external photon energy density @xmath43 @xmath2 fluences model grb with @xmath44 pulses thin curves show collapsar model results at @xmath45 200 300 @xmath46 expected numbers @xmath2 km - scale detector @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 no prospect detect @xmath2 from grbs these levels curves sa model predictions of @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 equipartition magnetic fields 1.9 kg 0.25 kgexternal radiation field model makes neutrino detection rate insensitive to @xmath53 @xmath54 little hope km@xmath55 detector detect grbs neutrino production efficiency 3 if @xmath57 same fluence narrow spikes nearly opaque to @xmath0 rays with @xmath58 little hope detect neutrinos except rare grbs with fluence @xmath59 grb with hard x - ray fluence @xmath60 doppler factors @xmath53 thin curves show collapsar model results internal synchrotron radiation field source target photons photomeson neutrino production for grb with @xmath61 @xmath51 electromagnetic radiation pair - photon cascades from secondary electrons @xmath0 rays total number @xmath2 expected with icecube is @xmath62 fluence cascade photons contributed by lepton synchrotron compton emissions dotted curve shows primary lepton synchrotron radiation spectrum fluence cascade photons is @xmath40% of primary synchrotron radiation maximum baryon loading exceed @xmath63 primary synchrotron limits maximum number @xmath2 to @xmath64 large for rare grbsnumbers increased in sa model efficient extraction by internal photons @xmath51 dotted curve shows fluence grb calculations dashed curves show compton synchrotron contributions to photon fluence from electromagnetic cascade photomeson processes few high - energy @xmath2 detected with icecube from bright grb at fluence level @xmath65 baryon loading high detection single @xmath2 requires fluence @xmath66 above 1 tev energy release in high - energy neutrinos electromagnetic secondaries equal energy reprocessed in pair - photon cascade observable radiation x - soft-ray energies radiation exceed measured fluence limit on maximum number @xmath2 from grb high baryon loading thanks nrl high energy space environment branch for support work supported by office of naval research nasa glast science investigation grant
| 0.312148
| 2,039
| 1,066
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,808
|
recently , quaternion - valued signal processing has received more and more attention . in this paper ,
the quaternion - valued sparse system identification problem is studied for the first time and a zero - attracting quaternion - valued least mean square ( lms ) algorithm is derived by considering the @xmath0 norm of the quaternion - valued adaptive weight vector . by incorporating the sparsity information of the system into the update process , a faster convergence speed is achieved , as verified by simulation results . * _ keywords : _ * quaternion ; sparsity ; system identification ; adaptive filtering ; lms algorithm .
|
in adaptive filtering @xcite , there is a class of algorithms specifically designed for sparse system identification , where the unknown system only has a few large coefficients while the remaining ones have a very small amplitude so that they can be ignored without significant effect on the overall performance of the system .
a good example of them is the zero - attracting least mean square ( za - lms ) algorithm proposed in @xcite .
this algorithm can achieve a higher convergence speed , and meanwhile , reduce the steady state excess mean square error ( mse ) .
compared to the classic lms algorithm @xcite , the za - lms algorithm introduces an @xmath0 norm in its cost function , which modifies the weight vector update equation with a zero attractor term .
recently , the hypercomplex concepts have been introduced to solve problems related to three or four - dimensional signals @xcite , such as vector - sensor array signal processing @xcite , color image processing @xcite and wind profile prediction @xcite .
as quaternion - valued algorithms can be regarded as an extension of the complex - valued ones , the adaptive filtering algorithms in complex domain could be extended to the quaternion domain as well , such as the quaternion - valued lms ( qlms ) algorithm in @xcite . in this paper
, we propose a novel quaternion - valued adaptive algorithm with a sparsity constraint , which is called zero - attracting qlms ( za - qlms ) algorithm .
the additional constraint is formulated based on the @xmath0 norm .
both the qlms and za - qlms algorithms can identify an unknown sparse system effectively .
however , a better performance in terms of convergence speed is achieved by the latter one .
this paper is organized as follows .
a review of basic operations in the quaternion domain is provided in section [ sec : quaternion_basic ] to facilitate the following derivation of the za - qlms algorithm .
the proposed za - qlms algorithm is derived in section [ sec : za - qlms ] .
simulation results are given in section [ sec : simulations ] , and conclusions are drawn in section [ sec : conclusions ] .
quaternion is a non - commutative extension of the complex number , and normally a quaternion consists of one real part and three imaginary parts , denoted by subscripts @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 , respectively . for a quaternion number @xmath5
, it can be described as @xmath6 where @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 , and @xmath10 are real - valued @xcite . for a quaternion , when its real part is zero , it becomes a pure quaternion . in this paper
, we consider the conjugate operator of @xmath5 as @xmath11 .
the three imaginary units @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and @xmath14 satisfy @xmath15 as a quaternion has the noncommutativity property , in multiplication , the exchange of any two elements in their order will give a different result .
for example , we have @xmath16 rather than @xmath17 . to derive the quaternion - valued adaptive algorithm , the starting point is the general operation of differentiation with respect to a quaternion - valued vector . at first , we need to give the definition of differentiation with respect to a quaternion @xmath5 and its conjugate @xmath18 .
assume that @xmath19 is a function of the quaternion variable @xmath5 , which is expressed as @xmath20 where @xmath19 is in general quaternion - valued .
the definition of @xmath21 can be expressed as @xcite @xmath22 the derivative of @xmath19 with respect to @xmath18 can be defined in a similar way @xmath23 with this definition , we can easily obtain @xmath24 some product rules can be obtained from above formulations , such as the differentiation of quaternion - valued functions to real variables .
suppose @xmath19 and @xmath25 are two quaternion - valued functions of the quaternion variable @xmath5 , and @xmath26 is the real variable .
then we can have the following result @xmath27 when the quaternion variable @xmath5 is replaced by a quaternion - valued vector @xmath28 , given by @xmath29^{t}\ ] ] where @xmath30 , @xmath31 , the differentiation of the function @xmath32 with respect to the vector @xmath28 can be derived using a combination of ( [ eq : general_definition ] ) straightforwardly in the following @xmath33 \label{eq : vector_definition}\end{aligned}\ ] ] similarly , we define @xmath34 as @xmath35 \label{eq : conj_vector_definition}\end{aligned}\ ] ] obviously , when @xmath36 , ( [ eq : vector_definition ] ) and ( [ eq : conj_vector_definition ] ) are reduced to ( [ eq : general_definition ] ) and ( [ eq : conj_general_definition ] ) , respectively .
to improve the performance of the lms algorithm for sparse system identification , the za - qlms algorithm is derived in this section . to achieve this , similar to @xcite , in the cost function , we add an @xmath0 norm penalty term for the quaternion - valued weight vector @xmath37 $ ] . for a standard adaptive filter , the output @xmath38 $ ] and error @xmath39
$ ] can be expressed as @xmath40&=&{\textbf{w}^{t}[n]}{\textbf{x}[n]}\\ e[n]&=&d[n]-{\textbf{w}^{t}[n]}{\textbf{x}[n]},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath37 $ ] is the adaptive weight vector with a length of @xmath41 , @xmath42 $ ] is the reference signal , @xmath43=[x[n-1 ] , \cdots , x[n - l]]^{t}$ ] is the input sample vector , and @xmath44 denotes the transpose operation . moreover ,
the conjugate form @xmath45 $ ] of the error signal @xmath39 $ ] is given by @xmath46=d^{*}[n]-{\textbf{x}^{h}[n]}{\textbf{w}^{*}[n]},\ ] ] our proposed cost function with a zero attractor term is given by @xmath47=e[n]e^{*}[n]+\gamma{\|\textbf{w}[n]\|}_1\;,\ ] ] where @xmath48 is a small constant .
the gradient of the above cost function with respect to @xmath49 $ ] and @xmath37 $ ] can be respectively expressed as @xmath50=\frac{\partial { j_0[n]}}{\partial \textbf{w}^ { * } } \label{eq : conj_gradient_cost_function}\ ] ] and @xmath51=\frac{\partial { j_0[n]}}{\partial \textbf{w } } \label{eq : gradient_cost_function}\ ] ] from @xcite , we know that the conjugate gradient gives the maximum steepness direction for the optimization surface . therefore , the conjugate gradient @xmath52 $ ] will be used to derive the update of the coefficient weight vector .
expanding the cost function , we obtain @xmath53&=&e[n]e^{*}[n]+\gamma{\|\textbf{w}[n]\|}_1\nonumber\\ & = & d[n]d^{*}[n]-d[n]{\textbf{x}^{h}[n]}{\textbf{w}^{*}[n]}-{\textbf{w}^{t}[n ] } { \textbf{x}[n]}d^{*}[n]\nonumber\\ & ~&+{\textbf{w}^{t}[n ] } { \textbf{x}[n]}{\textbf{x}^{h}[n]}{\textbf{w}^{*}[n]}+\gamma{\|\textbf{w}[n]\|}_1\;. \label{eq : extended_cost_function}\end{aligned}\ ] ] furthermore , @xmath54}}{\partial \textbf{w}^{*}}&=&\frac{\partial { ( e[n]e^{*}[n]+\gamma{\|\textbf{w}[n]\|}_1)}}{\partial \textbf{w}^{*}}\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{\partial}{\partial \textbf{w}^{*}}(d[n]d^{*}[n]-d[n]{\textbf{x}^{h}[n]}{\textbf{w}^{*}[n]}\nonumber\\ & & -{\textbf{w}^{t}[n ] } { \textbf{x}[n]}d^{*}[n]+{\textbf{w}^{t}[n ] } { \textbf{x}[n]}{\textbf{x}^{h}[n]}{\textbf{w}^{*}[n]})\nonumber\\ & & + \frac{\partial ( { \gamma{\|\textbf{w}[n]\|}_1})}{\partial \textbf{w}^{*}}\;. \label{eq : extended_gradient_cost_function}\end{aligned}\ ] ] details of the derivation process for the gradient are shown in the following @xmath55d^{*}[n])}{\partial { \textbf{w}^{*}[n ] } } = 0 \label{eq : part_1}\ ] ] @xmath55{\textbf{x}^{h}[n]}{\textbf{w}^{*}[n]})}{\partial { \textbf{w}^{*}[n ] } } = d[n]\textbf{x}^{*}[n ] \label{eq : part_2}\ ] ] @xmath56}{\textbf{x}[n]}d^{*}[n])}{\partial { \textbf{w}^{*}[n ] } } = -\frac{1}{2}d[n]\textbf{x}^{*}[n ] \label{eq : part_3}\ ] ] @xmath57 } { \textbf{x}[n]}{\textbf{x}^{h}[n]}{\textbf{w}^{*}[n]})}{\partial { \textbf{w}^{*}[n]}}=\frac{1}{2}{\textbf{w}^{t}[n]}{\textbf{x}[n]}{\textbf{x}^{*}[n]}. \label{eq : part_4}\ ] ] moreover , the last part of the gradient of cost function is given by @xmath58\|}_1})}{\partial \textbf{w}^ { * } } = \frac{1}{4 } \gamma\cdot{sgn(\textbf{w}[n])}\ ; , \label{eq : part_5}\ ] ] where the symbol @xmath59 is a component - wise sign function that is defined as @xcite @xmath60 combining the above results , the final gradient can be obtained as follows @xmath50=-\frac{1}{2}e[n]\textbf{x}^{*}[n]+\frac{1}{4}\gamma\cdot{sgn(\textbf{w}[n])}\;.\ ] ] with the general update equation for the weight vector @xmath61 = \textbf{w}[n]-\mu \nabla_{\textbf{w}^{*}}j_0[n],\ ] ] where @xmath62 is the step size , we arrive at the following update equation for the proposed za - qlms algorithm @xmath61 = \textbf{w}[n]+\mu(e[n]\textbf{x}^{*}[n])-\rho\cdot{sgn(\textbf{w}[n])}\ ; , \label{eq : update_weight_vector}\ ] ] where @xmath63 . the last term represents the zero attractor , which enforces the near - zero coefficients to zero and therefore accelerates the convergence process when majority of the system coefficients are nearly zero in a sparse system . note
that equation will be reduced to the normal qlms algorithm without the zero attractor term , given by @xcite @xmath61=\textbf{w}[n]+\mu(e[n]{\textbf{x}}^{*}[n])\;.\ ] ]
in this part , simulations are performed for sparse system identification using the proposed algorithm in comparison with the qlms algorithm .
two different sparse systems are considered corresponding to scenario one and scenario two in the following .
the input signal to the adaptive filter is colored and generated by passing a quaternion - valued white gaussian signal through a randomly generated filter .
the noise part is quaternion - valued white gaussian and added to the output of the unknown sparse system , with a 30db signal to noise ratio ( snr ) for both scenarios .
for the first scenario , the parameters are : the step size @xmath62 is @xmath64 ; the unknown sparse fir filter length @xmath41 is @xmath65 , with @xmath66 non - zero coefficients at the 2nd , 8th , 16th and 31st taps , and its magnitude of the impulse response is shown in fig .
[ fig : w ] ; the coefficient of the zero attractor @xmath67 is @xmath68 .
the learning curve obtained by averaging @xmath69 runs of the corresponding algorithm is given in fig .
[ fig : learning_curve_1 ] , where we can see that the za - qlms algorithm has achieved a faster convergence speed than the qlms algorithm when they both reach a similar steady state . ] ] for this case , length of the unknown fir filter is reduced to @xmath70 , still with @xmath66 active taps .
the parameters are : step size @xmath62 is @xmath71 and the value of @xmath67 is @xmath71 .
the results are shown in fig .
[ fig : learning_curve_2 ] .
again we see that the za - qlms algorithm has a faster convergence speed and has even converged to a lower steady state error in this specific scenario . ]
in this paper , a quaternion - valued adaptive algorithm has been proposed for more efficient identification of unknown sparse systems .
it is derived by introducing an @xmath0 penalty term in the original cost function and the resultant zero - attracting quaternion - valued lms algorithm can achieve a faster convergence rate by incorporating the sparsity information of the system into the update process .
simulation results have been provided to show the effectiveness of the new algorithm .
yilun chen , yuantao gu , and alfred o hero , `` sparse for system identification , '' in _ acoustics , speech and signal processing , 2009 .
icassp 2009 .
ieee international conference on_. ieee , 2009 , pp .
31253128 .
zhang , w. liu , y.g .
xu , and z.w .
liu , `` quaternion - based worst case constrained beamformer based on electromagnetic vectoe - sensor arrays , '' in _ proc .
ieee international conference on acoustics , speech , and signal processing _ , vancouver , canada , may 2013 , pp .
41496153 . x. r. zhang , w. liu , y. g. xu , and z. w. liu , `` quaternion - valued robust adaptive beamformer for electromagnetic vector - sensor arrays with worst - case constraint , '' , vol .
104 , pp . 274283 ,
november 2014 .
m. b. hawes and w. liu , `` a quaternion - valued reweighted minimisation approach to sparse vector sensor array design , '' in _ proc . of the international conference on digital signal processing _
, hong kong , august 2014 .
m. d. jiang , w. liu , y. li , and x. r. zhang , `` frequency - domain quaternion - valued adaptive filtering and its application to wind profile prediction , '' in _ proc .
of the ieee tencon conference _ , xian , china , october 2013 .
m. d. jiang , w. liu , and y. li , `` a general quaternion - valued gradient operator and its applications to computational fluid dynamics and adaptive beamforming , '' in _ proc .
of the international conference on digital signal processing _
, hong kong , august 2014 .
|
adaptive filtering @xcite class algorithms for sparse system identification unknown system few large coefficients remaining small amplitude ignored without effect performance example zero - attracting least mean square ( za - lms ) algorithm higher convergence speed steady state excess mean square error ) za - lms algorithm introduces @xmath0 norm in cost function modifies weight vector update equation with zero attractor term hypercomplex concepts introduced to solve problems three four - dimensional signals vector - sensor array signal processing color image processing wind profile prediction quaternion - valued algorithms extension of complex - valued ones adaptive filtering algorithms extended to quaternion domain novel quaternion - valued adaptive algorithm with sparsity constraint zero - attracting qlms ( za - qlms ) algorithm additional constraint formulated based on @xmath0 norm qlms and za - qlms algorithms identify unknown sparse system better performance convergence speed by latter one paper organized review of basic operations in quaternion domain in section derivation of za - qlms algorithmproposed za - qlms algorithm derived in section simulation results in conclusions drawn quaternion non - commutative extension of complex number one real three imaginary parts denoted by subscripts @xmath1 @xmath2 quaternion number @xmath5 described as @xmath6 @xmath7 are real - valued @xcite when real part zero becomes pure quaternion consider conjugate operator of @xmath5 as @xmath11 three imaginary units @xmath12 @xmath14 satisfy @xmath15 quaternion noncommutativity property exchange of two elements different result example @xmath16 rather than @xmath17 derive quaternion - valued adaptive algorithm starting point general operation of differentiation quaternion - valued vector definition of differentiation quaternion @xmath5 conjugate @xmath18 assume @xmath19 function of quaternion variable @xmath5 expressed as @xmath20 @xmath19 quaternion - valued definition @xmath21 expressed as @xcite @xmath22 derivative @xmath19 @xmath18 defined similar @xmath23 obtain @xmath24 product rules from formulations differentiation of quaternion - valued functions to real variables @xmath19 and @xmath25 quaternion - valued functions of variable @xmath5 @xmath26 real variable result @xmath27 when quaternion variable @xmath5 replaced by quaternion - valued vector @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 differentiation function @xmath32 vector @xmath28 derived using combination [ eq : general_definition ] ) @xmath33 define @xmath34 as @xmath35 @xmath36 conj reduced to [ eq : general_definition eq conj_general_definition improve performance lms algorithm for sparse system identification za - qlms algorithm derived in section similar @xcite cost function add @xmath0 norm penalty term for quaternion - valued weight vector @xmath37standard adaptive filter output @xmath38 error @xmath39 expressed as @xmath40&={\textbf{w}^{t}[n}{\textbf{x}[n]}\\=&d[n]-{\textbf{w}^{t}[n\textbf{x}[n]}{aligned @xmath37 adaptive weight vector length @xmath41 @xmath42 reference signal @xmath43=[x[n-1 input sample vector @xmath44 transpose operation conjugate form @xmath45 error signal @xmath39 given @xmath46=d^{*}[n]-{\textbf{x}^{h}[n]}\textbf{w}^{*}[n]} proposed cost function zero attractor term @xmath47=e[n]e^{*}[n]+\gamma{\textbf{w}[n] @xmath48 small constant gradient cost function @xmath49 @xmath37 expressed as @xmath50=\frac{\partial j_0[n{ \textbf{w}_cost_function @xmath51=\frac{\partial_0 \textbf_cost conjugate gradient maximum steepness direction optimization surfaceconjugate gradient @xmath52 derive update coefficient weight vector expanding cost function obtain @xmath53{*}[n+\gamma{\textbf{w}[n]\nonumber\\^{*}\textbf{x}^{h}\textbf{w*}\textbf}\textbf{x}[n^{*}[n]\nonumber\\{\textbf{w}^{t}[n \textbf{x}\textbf{h}{*}[n+\gamma{\textbf{w}[n]}_1\label extended_cost_function{aligned @xmath54}}\partial \textbf{w{*}}\frac\partial*}[n\gamma\textbf{w\partial \textbf{w{*}}\nonumber\\\frac\partial\textbf*}}}\textbf{x}{h}[n\textbf{w{*}[n]}\nonumber\\{\textbf{w}^{t}[n{x}[n}d{*}[n{\textbf{w}^{t}[n \textbf{x}[n\textbf{x{h}[n\textbf{w}^{*}[n]}\nonumber\\\frac{\partial\textbf{w\partial \textbf{w^{*}}{eq extended_gradient_cost_function details derivation process gradient shown @xmath55d{*}[n\partial \textbf{w{*}[n{eq part_1} @xmath55{\textbf{x}}[n*}[n\partial \textbf*}[n\textbf{x{*}[n{eq part_2} @xmath56}\textbf{x}[n{*}[n\partial \textbf{w{*}[n -\frac{1}{2}d[n]\textbf{x}{*}[n{eq part_3} @xmath57 \textbf{x}[n]{h}[n\textbf{w{*}[n\partial \textbf{w{*}[n\frac{1}{2}\textbf{w}[n{x}[n{x}{*}[n]}{eq part_4} last part gradient cost function @xmath58 \textbf{w = \frac{1}{4\gamma\cdot{sgn(\textbf{w}[n]{eq part_5} symbol @xmath59 component - sign function @xcite @xmath60 final gradient @xmath50=-\frac{1}{2}e\textbf{x}^{*}[n]+\frac{1}{4}\gamma\cdot{sgn([n update equation weight vector @xmath61 = \textbf{w}[n]-\mu\textbf_0 @xmath62 step size update equation proposed za - qlms algorithm @xmath61 = \textbf{w}[n]+\mu\textbf{x}^{*}[n])-\cdot{sgn(\textbf{w}[n]{eq update_weight_vector} @xmath63 last term zero attractor enforces near - zero coefficients accelerates convergence system coefficients zeroequation reduced to qlms algorithm without zero attractor term @xmath61=\textbf{w}[n]+\mu(e\textbf[n simulations for sparse system identification proposed algorithm two sparse systems scenario one two input signal adaptive filter colored quaternion - valued white gaussian signal randomly generated filter noise part quaternion - valued white gaussian added to output sparse system 30db signal to noise ratio scenarios first scenario parameters step size @xmath62 is @xmath64 unknown sparse fir filter length @xmath41 is @xmath65 @xmath66 non - zero coefficients at 2nd 8th 16th 31st taps impulse response in fig . coefficient of zero attractor @xmath67 is @xmath68 learning curve averaging @xmath69 runs za - qlms algorithm faster convergence speed than qlms length unknown fir filter reduced to @xmath70 with @xmath66 active taps parameters step size @xmath62 is @xmath71 value of @xmath67 is @xmath71 results in fig learning_curve_2za - qlms algorithm faster convergence speed lower steady state error quaternion - valued adaptive algorithm proposed for efficient identification unknown sparse systems derived introducing @xmath0 penalty term in original cost function zero - attracting quaternion - valued lms algorithm faster convergence rate incorporating sparsity information update process simulation results effectiveness new algorithm yilun chen yuantao gu alfred o hero sparse system identification acoustics speech signal processing 2009 2009 international conference 31253128 zhang w. liu y xu quaternion - based worst case constrained beamformer electromagnetic vectoe - sensor arrays international conference vancouver may 2013 41496153 quaternion - valued robust adaptive beamformer for electromagnetic vector - sensor arrays worst - case constraint vol . 104 pp . 274283 november 2014 m b. hawes w. liu quaternion - valued reweighted minimisation approach to sparse vector sensor array design international conference digital signal processing hong kong august 2014zhang frequency domain quaternion adaptive filtering wind profile prediction ieee tencon conference xian china october 2013 jiang liu y li general quaternion - valued gradient operator applications computational fluid dynamics adaptive beamforming international conference digital signal processing hong kong august 2014
| 0.664439
| 3,562
| 1,893
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,813
|
neutrino - photon interactions in the presence of an external homogeneous constant electromagnetic field are studied .
the @xmath0 amplitude is calculated in an electromagnetic field of the general type , when the two field invariants are nonzero .
|
neutrino - photon interactions are of interest in astrophysics and cosmology .
it is well known that in the standard model , neutrino - photon interactions appear at the one - loop level .
it is also well known that in a vacuum the reaction @xmath1 is forbidden .
the processes with two photons , for example , neutrino - photon scattering @xmath2 , turn out to be highly suppressed . in @xcite gell - mann showed that in the four - fermi limit of the standard model the amplitude is exactly zero to order @xmath3 because , according to yang s theorem @xcite , two photons can not couple to the @xmath4 state .
therefore the amplitude is suppressed by the additional factors of @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the photon energy and @xmath7 is the @xmath8 mass @xcite .
for example , in the case of massless neutrinos , the amplitude for @xmath9 in the standard model is suppressed by the factor @xmath10 @xcite . as a result ,
the cross section is exceedingly small .
so we see that neutrino - photon processes with one or two photons do not occur or are suppressed in the vacuum .
the presence of a medium or external electromagnetic field drastically changes the situation .
it induces an effective coupling between photons and neutrinos , which contributes to the @xmath1 process and cross - related reactions .
furthermore , it was shown in @xcite that in the presence of an external magnetic field , cross sections for neutrino - photon processes such as @xmath11 and @xmath12 are enhanced by the factor @xmath13 for @xmath14 and @xmath15 .
later this result was extended to very strong magnetic fields @xcite and arbitrary @xmath16 @xcite . in this paper
we will deal with @xmath1 and @xmath17 reactions in the presence of an external electromagnetic field .
the photon decay process @xmath18 in presence of a magnetic field was studied by several authors @xcite .
the cherenkov process @xmath19 is the cross process to photon decay and was studied in a crossed field @xcite and in a magnetic field in @xcite .
the aim of this paper is to consider the case of an arbitrary homogeneous electromagnetic field .
this case was also considered recently in @xcite but , from our point of view , the expression obtained is unfinished insofar as the very short tensorial structure of the v - a two - point amplitude , which we derive in ( [ ha9 ] ) , is nowhere visible in @xcite .
therefore it was not possible to compare our expressions to schubert s formula ( 5.15 ) .
since this topic abounds in errors and controversies ( see @xcite for a thorough discussion of the literature and its critique ) , we will devote this article mainly to a careful analysis of this expression and will postpone physical applications to another forthcoming paper .
let us begin with the effective lagrangian . at energies very much smaller than the w- and z - boson masses ,
both processes are described by an effective four - fermion interaction , @xmath21 here , @xmath22 stands for the electron field , @xmath23 , @xmath24 and @xmath25 for @xmath26 , where the first terms in @xmath27 and @xmath28 are the contributions from the w exchange diagram and the second one from the z exchange diagram .
also , @xmath29 and @xmath30 for @xmath31 .
then the amplitude for the diagram in fig.1 is given by @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the well - known polarisation operator of qed .
it was calculated earlier in @xcite .
our aim is to calculate @xmath34 . for this purpose we will use the technique developed in @xcite . in this approach
we begin with @xmath35 where @xmath36 with @xmath37 , and we have to calculate the mean value over the states x=0 : @xmath38 . for the analysis it is convenient to use a special representation for the field tensor : @xmath39 with the tensors @xmath40 and @xmath41 defined by @xmath42 where @xmath43 then . ] @xmath44 these tensors satisfy very useful identities : @xmath45 now the result of our calculation is given by @xmath46e^{-ism^{2 } } & \nonumber \\ & [ ( ck)^{\mu } ( c^{2}k)^{\nu } m_{1}+(bk)^{\mu } ( b^{2}k)^{\nu } m_{2}+ & \\ & [ ( c^{2}k)^{\mu } ( bk)^{\nu } + ( bk)^{\mu } ( c^{2}k)^{\nu } + ( kc^{2}k)b^{\mu \nu } ] m_{3 } & \nonumber \\ & [ ( b^{2}k)^{\mu } ( ck)^{\nu } + ( ck)^{\mu } ( b^{2}k)^{\nu } + ( kb^{2}k)c^{\mu \nu } ] m_{4}]\ } , & \nonumber \\\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath47 with @xmath48 as in the previous calculations in presence of a magnetic field @xcite , this result is not gauge invariant .
we also see that our amplitude is ultraviolet convergent . nevertheless , in order to preserve gauge invariance , we must regularize it using a gauge invariant regularization .
this phenomenon should be familiar from quantum electrodynamics .
for example , the photon - photon scattering amplitude , though formally converging , must be regularized to get a gauge invariant result @xcite . a convenient way of restoring gauge invariance in diagrams with pseudovector coupling is to use the pauli - villars regularization .
then it is easy to show that to obtain the final gauge invariant expression for the amplitude we must just omit the first two terms in ( [ ha7 ] ) , because they are cancelled by regulator terms .
finally , we obtain @xmath49e^{-ism^{2 } } \left\ { \right .
( ck)^{\mu } ( c^{2}k)^{\nu } m_{1}+ \nonumber \\ & & ( bk)^{\mu } ( b^{2}k)^{\nu } m_{2}+[(c^{2}k)^{\mu } ( bk)^{\nu } + ( bk)^{\mu } ( c^{2}k)^{\nu } + ( kc^{2}k)b^{\mu \nu } ] m_{3}+\\ & & [ ( b^{2}k)^{\mu } ( ck)^{\nu } + ( ck)^{\mu } ( b^{2}k)^{\nu } + ( kb^{2}k)c^{\mu \nu } ] m_{4}\left . \right\ } .\nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] this method of getting a gauge invariant expression allows us , unlike the authors of @xcite , to do without an anomaly cancellation mechanism at this stage of calculation .
let us note that the whole contribution of the triangle diagram is still present in ( [ ha9 ] ) .
this fact can be easily confirmed by an independent calculation of the triangle graph contribution . to deal with unwanted anomaly terms we must ,
as usual , take into account all fermions in a generation . in the following this
will always be assumed .
equation ( [ ha9 ] ) is the main result of this article .
let us now consider various checks of this expression .
first , in the limit of zero electric field it reproduces the results of @xcite .
a second nontrivial check of formula ( [ ha9 ] ) is to consider the following transformation : @xmath50 because of @xmath51 , @xmath52 , the tensor @xmath53 must be invariant under this transformation . from ( [ ha9 ] )
we see that it is indeed invariant and that under this transformation , the first term is interchanged with the second , and the third term is interchanged with the fourth , thus demonstrating the nontriviality of this check .
the next interesting limit is the case of a crossed field , where @xmath54 and @xmath55 are not only orthogonal but are also of equal modulus .
this causes the two invariants @xmath56 and @xmath57 to vanish .
the field dependence is therefore completely described by the invariant @xmath58 .
the correct procedure of finding the amplitude is to set @xmath59 first , and then take the limit @xmath60 .
using this procedure we find following expression : @xmath61 \right .
\nonumber \\ & & \int _ { 0}^{1}dv\left ( 1-v^{2}\right ) u\int _ { 0}^{\infty } dz \exp ( -i(zu+\frac{z^{3}}{3}))+\\ & & \left .
} ( f^{2}k)^{\nu } \left\ { \int _ { 0}^{1}dvu\int _ { 0}^{\infty } dz \exp ( -i(zu+\frac{z^{3}}{3}))+i\right\ } \right\}\ , , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath62 earlier the amplitudes in crossed fields were considered in @xcite .
we can compare only parts of ( [ m3 ] ) with those existing in the literature , because all previous results were presented in contracted form and with photons on the mass shell .
taking this into account we can say that our result contradicts that of @xcite and confirms that of @xcite .
we have presented the @xmath20 amplitude in the presence of an external homogeneous constant electromagnetic field .
the result is gauge invariant and reproduces the known results for an external magnetic field .
we further identified the crossed - field limit .
let us also emphasize that the general case of electric and magnetic fields is in need when considering ( low - frequency ) multiphoton one - loop processes with and without external fields .
the situation is similar to processes where the heisenberg - euler lagrangian turns out to be useful as e.g. , in the study of photon - splitting @xcite or in photon - neutrino processes as discussed in the recent article by dicus and repko @xcite .
hence we conclude that our results allow for a variety of applications that will also be discussed in a future publication .
i would like to thank professor w. dittrich for helpful discussions and for carefully reading the manuscript .
i am also grateful to dr h. gies for valuable comments and suggestions .
this work was supported by deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft under dfg di 200/5 - 1 .
r.shaisultanov , phys.rev.lett . * 80 * , 1586 ( 1998 ) m.v .
chistyakov , a.v .
kuznetsov and n.v .
mikheev , hep - ph/9808246 tzuu - kang chyi at all , hep - ph/9907384 d. v. galtsov and n. s. nikitina , zh .
theor . fiz .
62 , 2008 ( 1972 ) [ sov
jetp 35 , 1047 ( 1972 ) ] l. l. deraad jr .
, k. a. milton , and n. d. hari dass , phys .
d * 14 * , 3326 ( 1976 ) v. v. skobelev , zh .
71 , 1263 ( 1976 ) [ sov .
jetp 44 , 660 ( 1976 ) ] a.n .
ioannisian and g.g .
raffelt , phys .
d * 55 * , 7038 ( 1997 ) c.schubert , hep - ph/9905525 i.a.batalin and a.e.shabad , zh .
60 , 894 ( 1971 ) [ sov .
jetp 33 , 483 ( 1971 ) ] w.tsai , phys .
d * 10 * , 2699(1974 ) w.dittrich and m.reuter , effective lagrangians in quantum electrodynamics ; lecture notes in physics 220 ( springer - verlag , berlin , 1985 ) v.n.baier , v.m.katkov and v.strakhovenko , zh . eksp .
68 , 405 ( 1975 ) [ sov .
jetp 41 , 198 ( 1975 ) ] ; j. schwinger , particles , sources , and fields .
( perseus books , 1998 . 3v . ) w.tsai and a.yildiz , phys .
d * 8 * , 3446(1973 ) ; w.tsai , phys .
d * 8 * , 3460(1973 ) v.n.baier , v.m.katkov and v.strakhovenko , zh .
67 , 453 ( 1974 ) [ sov .
jetp 40 , n2 ( 1975 ) ] ; v. b. berestetskii , e. m. lifshitz , l. p. pitaevskii , quantum electrodynamics .
( pergamon , 1982 ) s.treiman , r. jackiw , b. zumino , e. witten , current algebra and anomalies .
( world scientific , 1985 ) a.a .
gvozdev , n.v .
mikheev and l.a .
vassilevskaya , phys .
d * 54 * , 5674 ( 1996 ) s. l. adler , j. n. bahcall , c. g. callan and m. n. rosenbluth , phys . rev .
* 25 * ( 1970 ) 1061 ; s.l.adler , ann.phys . *
67 * , 599 ( 1971 ) d.a.dicus and w.w.repko , phys.rev.lett . *
79 * , 569 ( 1997 )
|
neutrino - photon interactions in astrophysics cosmology in standard model interactions appear at one - loop level in vacuum reaction @xmath1 forbidden processes with two photons highly suppressed gell - mann showed four - fermi limit amplitude zero to @xmath3 yang s theorem two photons can couple to @xmath4 state amplitude suppressed by additional factors of @xmath5 @xmath6 photon energy mass massless neutrinos amplitude for @xmath9 suppressed by factor @xmath10 cross section small neutrino - photon processes with one or two photons suppressed in vacuum medium or external electromagnetic field changes situation induces coupling between photons neutrinos contributes to @xmath1 process cross - related reactions external magnetic field cross sections for neutrino - photon processes enhanced by factor @xmath13 for @xmath14 @xmath15 result extended to strong magnetic fields @xcite @xmath16 with @xmath1 @xmath17 reactions in external electromagnetic field photon decay process @xmath18 in magnetic field studied by several authorscherenkov process @xmath19 cross process to photon decay studied crossed field @xcite magnetic field @xcite aim paper consider arbitrary homogeneous electromagnetic field considered in @xcite expression unfinished short tensorial structure v - a two - point amplitude visible in @xcite compare expressions to schubert s formula ( 5.15 ) topic errors controversies see @xcite devote article to analysis expression postpone physical applications paper begin with effective lagrangian energies smaller than w- z - boson masses processes described four - fermion interaction @xmath21 @xmath22 electron field @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 first terms @xmath27 @xmath28 contributions from w exchange diagram second z exchange diagram @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 amplitude diagram fig.1 by @xmath32 @xmath33 polarisation operator of qed calculated in @xcite aim calculate @xmath34 use technique developed in @xcite begin with @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 calculate mean value over states x=0 : @xmath38 .analysis convenient use special representation field tensor @xmath39 tensors @xmath40 @xmath41 defined @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 tensors satisfy useful identities @xmath45 result calculation @xmath46e{2 \nonumber ck)^{\mu c^{2}k)^{\nu }{1}+(bk)^{\mu b^{2}k)^{\nu c^{2}k)^{\mu bk)^{\nu bk)^{\mu c^{2}k)^{\nu kc^{2}k)b^{\mu \nu{3\nonumber b^{2}k)^{\mu ck)^{\nu })^{\mu b^{2}k)^{\nu kb^{2}k)c^{\mu \nu_{4}\nonumber{aligned @xmath47 @xmath48 previous calculations magnetic field result not gauge invariant amplitude ultraviolet convergent preserve gauge invariance regularize gauge invariant regularization quantum electrodynamics photon - photon scattering amplitude converging regularized gauge invariant result restoring gauge invariance diagrams pseudovector coupling pauli - villars regularization easy show obtain final gauge invariant expression amplitude omit first two terms ( [ ha7 ] ) cancelled by regulator terms obtain @xmath49e^{-ism^{2 }\left\right ck)^{\mu c^{2}k)^{\nu }_{1} \nonumber bk)^{\mu b^{2}k)^{\nu }}(c^{2}k)^{\mu^{\nu bk)^{\mu c^{2}k)^{\nu kc^{2}k)b^{\mu \nu_{3} b^{2}k)^{\mu ck)^{\nu)^{\mu b^{2}k)^{\nu kb^{2}k)c^{\mu \nu_{4}\left \right\nonumber\end{aligned method gauge invariant expression allows anomaly cancellation mechanism calculation whole contribution triangle diagram present in ( [ ha9 ] ) confirmed independent calculation triangle graph contribution deal unwanted anomaly terms account all fermions generation assumed equation ( [ ha9 ] ) main result article consider checks expression limit zero electric field reproduces results @xcitesecond nontrivial check of formula ( [ ha9 ] ) consider transformation : @xmath50 @xmath51 tensor @xmath53 must be invariant under transformation ( [ ha9 ] ) invariant first term interchanged with second third term interchanged with fourth demonstrating nontriviality check next interesting limit crossed field @xmath54 and @xmath55 orthogonal equal modulus causes invariants @xmath56 and @xmath57 vanish field dependence described by invariant @xmath58 correct procedure finding amplitude set @xmath59 first then take limit @xmath60 find expression : @xmath61 \right \nonumber \int _ { 0}^{1}dv\left 1-v^{2}\right}^{\infty(zu{z^{3}}}{1\nonumber\end{aligned} @xmath62 amplitudes in crossed fields considered in @xcite compare parts of ( [ m3 ] ) with literature previous results presented in contracted form with photons on mass shell result contradicts @xcite confirms @xcite presented @xmath20 amplitude external homogeneous constant electromagnetic field result gauge invariant reproduces results external magnetic field identified crossed - field limit emphasize general case electric magnetic fields low - frequency multiphoton one - loop processes with without external fields similar heisenberg - euler lagrangian useful photon - splitting @xcite photon - neutrino processes results allow variety applications future publication professor w. dittrich discussions manuscript grateful dr h. gies comments suggestions work supported by deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft dfg di 200/5 - 1 r.shaisultanov .rev.lett . * 80 * , 1586 ( 1998 ) chistyakov kuznetsov mikheev hep - ph/9808246 - kang chyi ph/9907384 galtsov nikitina theor fiz . 62 , 2008 ( 1972 ) 35 , 1047 1972 deraad jr . milton hari dass phys . * 14 * , 3326 ( 1976 ) skobelev 71 , 1263 ( 1976 ) jetp 44 , 660 1976ioannisian raffelt phys d 55 7038 1997 ).schubert hep ph/9905525.batalin.shabad zh 60 , 894 1971 jetp 33 483 1971 w.tsai. d 10 * 2699(1974 ).dittrich.reuter lagrangians quantum electrodynamics lecture notes 220 springer - verlag berlin 1985.baier.katkov.strakhovenko 68 , 405 1975 ) jetp 41 , 198 1975 j schwinger particles sources fields perseus books 1998 w.tsai a.yildiz phys . d 8 * 3446(1973 8 3460(1973.baier.katkov.strakhovenko zh 67 , 453 ( 1974 ) jetp 40 n2 1975 berestetskii lifshitz pitaevskii quantum electrodynamics pergamon 1982.treiman jackiw zumino witten current algebra anomalies world scientific 1985 gvozdev mikheev vassilevskaya phys . d * 54 * 5674 ( 1996 ) adler bahcall callan rosenbluth phys rev 25 1970 ) 1061 s.l.adler ann.phys 67 599 1971 ) d.a.dicus.repko.rev.lett 79 569 1997
| 0.500623
| 3,118
| 1,641
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,815
|
we used optical microscopy to investigate flows inside water rivulets that were inkjet - printed onto different surfaces and under different ambient conditions .
the acquired fluid dynamics videos were submitted to the 2013 gallery of fluid motion .
|
understanding the flow inside sessile liquid structures of different shapes is important in a variety of solution - based material deposition and patterning processes .
solvent evaporation inherent in these processes is already known to lead to a rich variety of flows @xcite .
the small length scale and general lack of shape symmetry implies the potential for capillary pressure gradients and corresponding flow phenomena .
finally , the non - instantaneous nature of the formation of these liquid structures adds another element to the flow complexity . in the linked videos , we investigated the internal flow of inkjet - printed water rivulets of finite length using optical microscopy .
six millimeter - long rivulets were formed by printing a pre - determined number of drops ( @xmath0 m ) at controlled frequency ( @xmath1hz ) and spatial overlap ( @xmath2 m ) .
microscope cover slips made of borosilicate glass were surface coated and used as substrates .
two surface coatings were investigated - s1805 photoresist with and without koh etching .
rivulets were printed inside a controlled humidity chamber at two relative humidity levels - @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
the ambient , ink , and substrate were kept at room temperature ( @xmath5c ) . for fluorescent microscopy videos ,
the water was seeded with nile red polystyrene spheres ( @xmath6 m ) at @xmath7 volume fraction .
we report the experimental details and results of a wider range of both printing parameters , ink properties , and substrate surfaces elsewhere @xcite .
the two surface coatings resulted in different values of the static advancing and receding contact angles ( @xmath8 and @xmath9 ) for water and in the rivulet formation process during printing .
water droplets on the photoresist - coated surface exhibited @xmath10 and @xmath11while those on the etched surface @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
complete rivulet formation was inhibited on the first surface type due to a non - zero @xmath9 , which allowed capillary - driven contact line recession and rivulet breakup into individual droplets @xcite .
the zero @xmath9 on the second surface type prevented rivulet breakup @xcite but resulted in the formation of a distinctive bulge at the starting end of the water rivulet .
the bulge grows immediately after the coalescence of the first few drops during rivulet formation .
we investigated the flow that causes bulge growth by using optical fluorescent microscopy . during rivulet formation ,
a distinctly pulsatile axial flow drives fluid away from the terminal end of the growing rivulet where printed drops are landing .
the frequency of the flow is the same as the drop frequency .
it has been hypothesized that the large local mean curvature in the region where drops land causes a capillary pressure gradient along the length of the rivulet @xcite .
using @xmath14piv , the height- and width - averaged axial velocity was measured and showed that the amplitude of the pulsatile flow decreases with reduced relative humidity in the ambient , all other conditions being fixed .
the decreased flow magnitude results in the inhibition of bulge formation .
the video entry to the 2013 gallery of fluid motion is shown in * a schematic of the flow observation approach * visualization of rivulet break up during printing onto a substrate with non - zero receding contact angle ( surface type 1 ) * visualization of successful rivulet formation on surface type 2 and concequent bulge growth * fluorescence microscopy video showing pulsatile axial flow and corresponding mean axial speed * the effect of liquid evaporation on axial flow and bulge growth inhibition
|
understanding flow inside liquid structures important in solution - based material deposition patterning processes solvent evaporation to variety flows small length scale lack of shape symmetry capillary pressure gradients flow phenomena non - instantaneous formation liquid structures adds flow complexity investigated internal flow of inkjet - printed water rivulets finite length using optical microscopy six millimeter - long rivulets formed by printing drops at controlled frequency overlap microscope cover slips borosilicate glass surface coated as substrates two surface coatings investigated photoresist with without etching rivulets printed inside controlled humidity chamber at levels ambient ink substrate kept at room temperature water seeded with nile red polystyrene spheres volume fraction experimental details results of printing parameters ink properties substrate surfaces two surface coatings resulted in different static advancing receding contact angles for water rivulet formation process during printing water droplets on photoresist - coated surface exhibited @xmath10 on etched surface @xmath12rivulet formation inhibited first surface type due non - zero @xmath9 allowed capillary contact line recession rivulet breakup zero @xmath9 second surface prevented rivulet breakup resulted bulge starting end rivulet bulge grows after coalescence first drops investigated flow bulge growth optical fluorescent microscopy rivulet formation pulsatile axial flow drives fluid away from terminal end frequency flow same as drop frequency hypothesized large local curvature region drops causes capillary pressure gradient @xmath14piv averaged axial velocity measured amplitude pulsatile flow decreases reduced humidity conditions fixed decreased flow magnitude bulge formation video entry 2013 gallery fluid motion schematic flow observation approach visualization rivulet break up printing non - zero receding contact angle surface 1 successful rivulet formation surface type 2 bulge growth fluorescence microscopy video pulsatile axial flow mean axial speed effect liquid evaporation axial flow bulge growth inhibition
| 0.135151
| 760
| 358
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,819
|
secondary infall in galaxies could cause the angular momentum of the outer halo to change its orientation .
the generation of warps due to this effect is studied using n - body simulations .
|
in many spiral galaxies the outer regions of the disk curve away from the symmetry plane of the inner disk , resembling an integral sign . this is called a _
warp_. the cause of this phenomenon is still uncertain , but a dark halo may play an important role .
sparke & casertano ( 1988 ) found some long - lived warping normal modes inside an oblate halo potential , but they used a halo that was unperturbed by the disk .
later , dubinski & kuijken ( 1995 ) and nelson & tremaine ( 1995 ) , following a comment by toomre ( 1983 ) , showed that when the response of the halo is taken into account the sparke & casertano modes are no longer long - lived .
cosmic infall of matter onto galaxies has been proposed as a possible explanation for the warp phenomenon ( ostriker & binney 1989 ) .
this infall likely causes the net angular momentum vectors of disk galaxies to reorient each hubble time . in this work ,
we simulate and analyze the response of a disk embedded in a halo whose orientation is changed slowly .
the properties of the warps generated this way are studied later , both in shape and amplitude .
the halo and the disk have been constructed following kuijken & dubinski ( 1995 ) , using a self - consistent approach .
the halo has a lowered evans distribution function , and the disk is modeled with concentric spinning rings .
the mass profile and rotation curves of the different models can be seen in figure [ 1 ] .
the main parameters of both models are summarized in table [ 1 ] .
the number of particles used for each model was of @xmath0 particles for the halo , and 400 rings , each of them consisting of 90 particles .
.model parameters : ( 1 ) disk mass , ( 2 ) disk scale length , ( 3 ) disk truncation radius , ( 4 ) disk scale height , ( 5 ) disk truncation length , ( 6 ) halo central potential , ( 7 ) halo velocity dispersion , ( 8) halo potential flattening , ( 9 ) halo concentration , @xmath1 , ( 10 ) characteristic halo radius . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] the n - body code use to evolve the system uses a hybrid approach : the halo is made of particles , and its effect is computed with a self - consistent field code ( hernquist & ostriker , 1992 ) , expanding the potential in terms of some basic functions . the disk , however , is modeled using pivoted spinning rings .
the dynamics on the disk are computed calculating the potential and acceleration on the `` ring - particles '' , and then these are used to calculate the torque on each ring .
this is accomplished with a tree code ( barnes & hut , 1986 ) .
the first approach to the problem was to consider a rigidly rotating halo , unaffected by the gravitational effect of the disk .
the slewing rate of the halo was chosen to be h@xmath2 ( 100 km / s / mpc for a disk scale length of 3.5 kpc ) , so that the angular momentum of the halo re - orients in the predicted timescale.the axis of rotation of the halo lies in the initial halo - symmetry plane .
the results of the simulations for models * c * and * d * are shown in figure [ 2 ] . here
the inclination of the rings and the position angle of the line of nodes is plotted for different timesteps .
these plots show that the disk reorientation process is fast enough to follow the halo in the inner parts .
the disk warps where its self - gravitation is not enough to hold it in the same plane .
this is in perfect agreement with the briggs law ( briggs , 1990 ) : straight line of nodes in the center , leading spiral further out .
if the mass of the disk is doubled , the region aligned with the symmetry plane of the halo increases ( approximately one scale length ) , as expected .
as mentioned in the introduction , the assumption of a non - responding halo is very simplistic .
the next step is to simulate the re - orientation of a responsive halo that cosmic infall would cause . to do this
we will put a rotating _ tidal field _ through the galaxy .
this will make the symmetry plane of the outer halo change , gaining angular momentum this will be done by placing 2 _ satellites _ symmetrically , so that the monopole term of the tidal field is zero , avoiding relative movements of the galaxy with respect to the _ satellites_. this will also provide information about the influence of satellites on disks .
barnes , j. , hut , p. , 1986
, nature , 324 , 446 briggs , f.,1990 , , 352 , 15 dubinski , j. , kuijken , k. , 1995 , , 442 , 492 hernquist , l. , ostriker , j. p. , 1992
, , 376 , 375 kuijken , k. , dubinski , j. , 1995 , , 277 , 1341 nelson , r. w. , tremaine , s. , 1995 , , 275 , 897 ostriker , e. c. , binney , j. j. , 1989 , , 237 , 785 sparke , l. s. , casertano , s. , 1988 , , 234 , 837 toomre , a. , 1983 , iau symp .
100 , internal kinematics & dynamics of galaxies , ed .
e. athanassoula , pp .
dordrecht : reidel
|
spiral galaxies outer regions disk curve from inner resembling integral sign called warp_ cause uncertain dark halo may sparke & casertano 1988 found long - lived warping modes inside oblate halo potential used halo unperturbed by disk dubinski kuijken 1995 nelson & tremaine 1995 showed response halo sparke casertano modes no long - lived cosmic infall of matter onto galaxies proposed explanation warp 1989 ) infall causes angular momentum vectors disk galaxies reorient work simulate analyze response disk in halo orientation properties warps studied later shape amplitude halo disk constructed following kuijken & dubinski 1995 ) self - consistent approach halo lowered evans distribution function disk modeled with concentric spinning rings mass profile rotation curves models in figure [ 1 ] main parameters summarized in table [ 1 ] number of particles used each model @xmath0 particles halo 400 rings each 90 particles model parameters : disk mass 2 scale length truncation radius height 5 truncation length 6 halo central potential 7 halo velocity dispersion halo potential flattening 9 halo concentration @xmath1 10 characteristic halo radius n - body code hybrid approach halo of particles effect computed with self - consistent field code hernquist ostriker 1992 expanding potential functions disk modeled using pivoted spinning rings dynamics computed calculating potential acceleration on ring - particles torque on each ring accomplished with tree code ( barnes & hut 1986 ) first approach rigidly rotating halo unaffected by gravitational effect slewing rate h@xmath2 ( 100 km / s / mpc for disk scale length 3.5 kpc ) angular momentum re - orients in predicted timescale axis of rotation halo in initial halo - symmetry plane results simulations for models d shown in figure 2 ] inclination rings position angle of line of nodes plotted for timesteps disk reorientation fast halo disk warps self - gravitation not enough hold planeagreement with briggs law 1990 ) straight line nodes center leading spiral out mass disk doubled region aligned with symmetry plane halo increases one scale length assumption non - responding halo simplistic simulate re - orientation responsive halo cosmic infall rotating tidal field through galaxy symmetry plane outer halo gaining angular momentum placing 2 satellites symmetrically monopole term tidal field zero avoiding relative movements galaxy satellites information influence satellites on disks barnes , j. hut 1986 nature , 324 , 446 briggs ,1990 352 , 15 dubinski j kuijken 1995 442 , 492 hernquist l ostriker 1992 376 , 375 1995 277 , 1341 nelson tremaine 1995 275 , 897 ostriker binney 1989 237 , 785 sparke casertano 1988 234 , 837 toomre . 1983. 100 internal kinematics & dynamics of galaxies ed athanassoula dordrecht : reidel
| 0.186826
| 1,243
| 617
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,829
|
the galaxy cluster system abell 1689 has been well studied and yields good lensing and x - ray gas data .
modified gravity ( mog ) is applied to the cluster abell 1689 and the acceleration data is well fitted without assuming dark matter .
newtonian dynamics and modified newtonian dynamics ( mond ) are shown not to fit the acceleration data , while a dark matter model based on the navarro - frenk - white ( nfw ) mass profile is shown not to fit the acceleration data below @xmath0 .
[ firstpage ]
|
zwicky in 1933 ( @xcite ) found that unseen mass had to be assumed to exist to explain the observational data for the coma cluster .
subsequently , it was discovered that this unseen mass called dark matter had to be incorporated into gravity to explain the rotation curves of galaxies ( @xcite ) .
underground experiments ( @xcite ) as well as astrophysical searches have failed to detect dark matter particles .
an alternative explanation for the missing dark matter is to modify newtonian and einstein gravity .
one such fully covariant and lorentz invariant alternative theory is scalar - tensor - vector - gravity ( stvg ) , also know as mog ( @xcite ) . mog has passed successful tests in explaining rotation velocity data of spiral and dwarf galaxies ( @xcite ) , ( @xcite ) , globular clusters ( @xcite ) and clusters of galaxies ( @xcite ) .
recently , it was claimed ( @xcite ) that no modified gravity theory can fit the abell 1689 acceleration data without including dark matter or heavy ( sterile ) neutrinos .
the cluster a1689 is important , for good lensing and gas data are available and we have data from 3kpc to 3mpc .
we will show that mond ( @xcite ) does not fit the a1689 acceleration data , nor does the dark matter model based on an nfw mass profile .
however , mog does fit the a1689 acceleration data without dark matter .
we will use the weak field approximation of the theory at astrophysical scales to describe the dynamics of galaxies and clusters of galaxies .
the point particle acceleration is given by ( @xcite ) : @xmath1 . \label{pointacceleration}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath2 denotes newton s gravitational constant and @xmath3 denotes the mass .
the parameter @xmath4 determines the strength of attactive gravitation through @xmath5 , while @xmath6 is the mass of the vector field @xmath7 that produces a repulsive gravitational force through the gravitational charge : @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the current density matter source of the vector field @xmath7 . the mog acceleration ( [ mogpointacceleration ] ) satisfies the ( weak ) equivalence principle . for a distribution of matter ,
the acceleration is given by @xmath10 .
\end{split}\ ] ] the application of the theory to galaxies as well as clusters of galaxies determines the best fit values : @xmath11 and @xmath12 @xcite . the potential for a distribution of matter with density @xmath13 is given by : @xmath14
in order to see if mog fits the cluster a1689 data , we employ the normalized acceleration data given by nieuwenhuizen in his fig . 2 ( @xcite ) .
nieuwenhuizen has obtained the acceleration data by using a1689 strong and weak lensing data . in particular , the two - dimensional mass density @xmath15 has been determined by limousin et al .
( @xcite ) . from x - ray observations
the electron and gas mass density can be obtained .
we use 59 data points with 12 data points from ( @xcite ) at radii between 3 kpc and 271 kpc , 20 data points from ( @xcite ) , which overlap with the data of limousin et al . in the window between 40 kpc and 150 kpc , and 27 data points from ( @xcite ) , which cover the range between 125 kpc and 3 mpc .
the gas data is from chandra x - ray observations with a total exposure time of 150 ks ( @xcite ) and in our calculations we use a cored sersic electron density profile ( @xcite ) : @xmath16.\ ] ] from ( @xcite ) , we obtain @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 and @xmath20 . for a typical z=0.3 solar metallicity
the gas density is ( @xcite ) : @xmath21 background galaxies are far away from the cluster , so strong lensing can be treated as occurring due to mass projected onto the plane through the cluster center .
the strong lensing yields data for the mass density along the line - of - sight : @xmath22
we investigate the possibility of fitting the a1689 data with mog , mond and with a dark matter model using a nfw profile .
although there are many galaxies in a galaxy cluster , the galaxy mass density of a1689 is dominated by the brightest cluster galaxy ( bcg ) in the center of the cluster .
we will use the bcg density profile proposed in ( @xcite ) : @xmath23 where @xmath24 and @xmath25 denote the mass and the radial size of the central galaxy , respectively , while @xmath26 denotes its core size . in our calculations
, we use in our bcg mass density profile @xmath27 kpc , @xmath28 kpc and @xmath29 from ( @xcite ) . because the bcg is spherically symmetric
, we can use the mog point mass radial acceleration equation ( [ mogpointacceleration ] ) .
we can express this acceleration by the effective equation for @xmath30 : @xmath31 where @xmath32 denotes the baryon mass . by using @xmath33 and integrating @xmath34 over the volume of the cluster , we obtain the mass @xmath35 .
we choose the parameter values : @xmath36 and @xmath37 or @xmath38 kpc .
this choice of @xmath4 and @xmath6 parameters coincides with the values employed for fits to dwarf galaxy rotation curves ( @xcite ) .
we have plotted the mog predicted acceleration in fig.1 .
the acceleration data is from ( @xcite ) .
the acceleration curve for newtonian gravity without dark matter , determined by @xmath39 , is depicted in fig.1 . and does not fit the normalized acceleration data . in the case of mond , we use the following interpolating function @xmath40 to calculate the acceleration : @xmath41 this leads to the mond acceleration : @xmath42^{1/2}.\ ] ] the predicted mond normalized acceleration curve shown in fig.1 , follows closely the newtonian acceleration curve without dark matter . to obtain the a1689 dark matter normalized acceleration
, we adopt the nfw profile ( @xcite ) : @xmath43 the dark matter model acceleration is obtained from @xmath44 where @xmath45 denotes the dark matter mass .
we have from lensing data for a1689 ( @xcite ) : @xmath46 and @xmath47 . after integrating the nfw profile and calculating @xmath48
, we obtain the acceleration curve depicted in fig.1 .
we have normalized the acceleration in all three cases to @xmath49 .
as can be seen , mog can fit the data points from small to large radii . for the nfw profile dark matter model
, just a part of the data can be fitted for radii @xmath50 200 kpc . to see
if the data can be fitted for smaller radii , we change the value of @xmath51 to fit the model for smaller radii , but then for larger values of the radii the model no longer fits the data .
these results are shown in fig.1 .
the mond prediction is the same as the newtonian prediction , and for mond there is no way to fit the data except to include dark matter or heavy sterile neutrinos .
the lensing and the chandra x - ray data can determine the total baryon density for the cluster a1689 . the acceleration for newtonian , mond and mog models is then derived from the baryon mass @xmath35 by integrating the total baryon density , assuming that the bcg is the dominant mass in the a1689 cluster . the normalized acceleration for these models
is then compared with acceleration data for a1689 .
the newtonian and mond predictions without dark matter fall far short of fitting the data at all values of the radial distance @xmath52 . a dark matter model based on a nfw density profile with the parameters @xmath53 and @xmath54 determined by strong lensing data fits the acceleration data for @xmath55 kpc but not for @xmath52 below this value .
the mog predicted acceleration without dark matter provides a good fit to the data at both small and large values of @xmath52 .
modified gravity theories have been formulated to avoid the need for dark matter .
experiments have failed to detect dark matter particles motivating studying the alternative gravitational theories .
the fully covariant and lorentz invariant mog theory fits galaxy dynamics data and cluster data .
it also fits the merging clusters bullet cluster and the train wreck cluster ( abell 520 ) without dark matter ( @xcite ) .
a mog application to cosmology without dark matter can explain structure growth and the cmb data ( @xcite ) .
the fitting of the cluster a1689 data adds an important success for mog as an alternative gravity theory without dark matter .
we thank martin green , niayesh afshordi and theodorus nieuwenhuizen for helpful discussions .
we thank marceau limousin for supplying data and for helpful discussions .
this research was supported in part by perimeter institute for theoretical physics .
research at perimeter institute is supported by the government of canada through the department of innovation , science and economic development canada and by the province of ontario through the ministry of research , innovation and science .
|
zwicky 1933 found unseen mass assumed explain observational data coma cluster discovered mass dark matter incorporated into gravity explain rotation curves galaxies underground experiments astrophysical searches failed detect dark matter particles alternative explanation missing matter modify newtonian einstein gravity covariant lorentz invariant alternative theory scalar - tensor - vector - gravity ( stvg ) know mog passed successful tests explaining rotation velocity data of spiral dwarf galaxies globular clusters claimed no modified gravity theory fit abell 1689 acceleration data without dark matter heavy neutrinos cluster a1689 important good lensing gas data available data from 3kpc to 3mpc show mond fit a1689 acceleration data dark matter model based nfw mass profile mog a1689 acceleration data without dark matter use weak field approximation theory astrophysical scales describe dynamics of galaxies clusters point particle acceleration given by @xmath1 @xmath2 denotes newton s gravitational constant @xmath3 massparameter @xmath4 determines strength attactive gravitation @xmath5 @xmath6 mass vector field @xmath7 repulsive gravitational force charge @xmath8 @xmath9 current density matter source field mog acceleration satisfies weak equivalence principle distribution matter acceleration given by @xmath10 application theory to galaxies clusters determines best fit values @xmath11 @xmath12 potential distribution matter with density @xmath13 by @xmath14 mog fits cluster a1689 data employ normalized acceleration data nieuwenhuizen fig 2 obtained acceleration data a1689 strong weak lensing data two - dimensional mass density @xmath15 determined by limousin et al . x - ray observations electron gas mass density obtained 59 data points 12 from @xcite ) between 3 kpc and 271 kpc 20 overlap with data limousin et al 40 kpc 150 kpc 27 points range 125 kpc and 3 mpc gas data from chandra x - ray observations exposure time 150 ks use cored sersic electron density profile obtain @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath20typical z=0.3 solar metallicity gas density @xcite @xmath21 background galaxies far cluster strong lensing mass projected plane strong lensing yields data mass density line - of - sight fitting a1689 data with mog mond dark matter model nfw profile many galaxies galaxy cluster galaxy mass density a1689 dominated brightest cluster galaxy bcg center bcg density profile @xcite ) @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 mass radial size central galaxy @xmath26 core size use bcg mass density profile @xmath27 @xmath28 kpc @xmath29 @xcite bcg spherically symmetric mog point mass radial acceleration equation acceleration equation @xmath30 : @xmath31 @xmath32 baryon mass @xmath33 integrating @xmath34 volume cluster obtain mass @xmath35 choose parameter values @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 kpc coincides dwarf galaxy rotation curves plotted mog predicted acceleration fig.1 acceleration data from @xcite ) acceleration curve newtonian gravity without dark matter determined @xmath39 depicted fig.fit normalized acceleration data mond use interpolating function @xmath40 acceleration @xmath41 leads to mond acceleration : @xmath42 predicted mond normalized acceleration curve follows newtonian acceleration curve without dark matter a1689 dark matter normalized acceleration adopt nfw profile : @xmath43 dark matter model acceleration from @xmath44 @xmath45 dark matter mass lensing data for a1689 @xmath46 @xmath47 integrating nfw profile calculating @xmath48 obtain acceleration curve.1 normalized acceleration to @xmath49 mog fit data points small to large radii nfw profile dark matter model part data for radii @xmath50 200 kpc change value @xmath51 to fit smaller larger values no fits data results shown in.1 mond prediction same as newtonian prediction no way fit data except dark matter or heavy sterile neutrinos lensing chandra x - ray data determine total baryon density cluster a1689 acceleration for newtonian mond mog models derived from baryon mass @xmath35 dominant mass a1689 cluster normalized acceleration compared with data a1689newtonian mond predictions without dark matter data values radial distance @xmath52 dark matter model nfw density profile parameters @xmath53 @xmath54 fits acceleration @xmath55 not @xmath52 below mog acceleration without dark matter fit data at small large values @xmath52 modified gravity theories avoid dark matter experiments detect dark matter particles alternative gravitational theories covariant lorentz invariant mog theory fits galaxy dynamics cluster data fits merging clusters bullet cluster train wreck cluster without dark matter mog application cosmology without dark matter structure growth cmb data fitting cluster a1689 data adds success for mog alternative gravity theory without dark matter thank martin green niayesh afshordi theodorus nieuwenhuizen for discussions marceau limousin data research supported by perimeter institute for theoretical physics supported government canada province of ontario ministry
| 0.315303
| 2,083
| 1,042
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,841
|
we report on recent microscopic calculations of reaction properties based upon the nuclear structure of the _ ab initio _ no - core shell model ( ncsm ) .
|
we have explored two avenues for the _ ab initio _ calculations of nuclear - reaction properties starting from the nuclear structure of the ncsm @xcite : i ) the lorentz integral transform ( lit ) approach @xcite , and ii ) the resonating - group method ( rgm ) @xcite . in sect .
[ lit ] , we highlight a recent application of the ncsm / lit approach to the _ ab initio _
calculation @xcite of the @xmath0he total photo - absorption cross section . in sect .
[ rgm ] , we outline the ncsm / rgm approach and present its application to neutron-@xmath0he scattering .
we performed an _ ab initio _
calculation @xcite of the @xmath0he total photo absorption cross section in unretarded dipole approximation , using the high quality nn potential at the fourth order ( n@xmath1lo ) in the chiral effective field theory ( @xmath2eft ) expansion of ref .
@xcite , and the nnn interaction at the highest order presently available ( n@xmath3lo ) @xcite .
the two low - energy constants that parameterize the short - range nnn interaction were selected as discussed in ref .
the microscopic treatment of the continuum problem is achieved by means of the lit method , applied within the ncsm approach .
accurate convergence of the ncsm expansions is reached using three - body effective interactions for both the nn and nnn terms of the potential .
the results , presented in fig
. [ he4cs ] , show a peak around the excitation energy of @xmath4 mev , with peak - height mildly sensitive to the nnn force .
the experimental situation in the near - threshold region is controversial @xcite : we find an overall good agreement with the photo - disintegration data from bremsstrahlung photons of nilsson et al . and the indirect measurements of nakayama et al .
for reactions involving two nuclear fragmets , the rgm many - body wave function is expanded in terms of binary - cluster channel wave functions @xmath5
= \sum_{\nu}\int d\vec{r}\,\varphi_{\nu}(\vec{r}\,)\,\hat{\mathcal a}\,\phi_{\nu\vec{r}}^{(a - a , a)}\,,\ ] ] with @xmath6 here , @xmath7 is the antisymmetrizer accounting for the exchanges of nucleons between the two clusters ( which are already antisymmetric with respect to exchanges of internal nucleons ) . the relative - motion wave functions @xmath8 depend on the relative distance between the center of masses of the two clusters in channel @xmath9 .
they can be determined by solving the many - body schrdinger equation in the hilbert space spanned by the basis functions ( [ rgm_basis ] ) : @xmath10\varphi_{\nu}(\vec{r}\,)\,,\ ] ] where @xmath11 denotes the full hamiltonian of the system , and the two integration kernels are defined as @xmath12 in the ncsm / rgm approach we use _ ab initio _ ncsm wave functions for each of the two clusters , and ncsm effective interactions derived from realistic forces .
the most challenging task is to evaluate the hamiltonian and norm kernels : so far we have developed formalism for cluster states with a single - nucleon projectile and we have applied it to the scattering of low - energy neutrons on @xmath0he . in fig .
[ figphase ] , we present the converged @xmath13 phase shift for the @xmath14he system obtained using the bare @xmath15 @xcite potential , and two - body effective interactions derived from the @xmath2eft nn potential of ref . @xcite .
we find an overall good agreement with experiment .
this work was performed under the auspices of the u.s .
department of energy by lawrence livermore national laboratory under contract de - ac52 - 07na27344 .
support from u.s .
doe / sc / np ( work proposal number scw0498 ) and the department of energy under grant de - fc02 - 07er41457 is acknowledged . 9 navrtil , p. , et al .
. lett . * 84 * , 5728 ( 2000 ) ; phys . rev .
* c62 * , 054311 ( 2000 ) ; phys .
lett . * 88 * , 152502 ( 2002 ) ; phys . rev . *
c68 * , 034305 ( 2003 ) efros , v. d. , et al .
: phys . lett . *
b338 * , 130 ( 1994 ) tang , y. c. , et al : phys . rep .
* 47 * , 167 ( 1978 ) ; langanke , k. , friedrich , h. : advances in nuclear physics .
newyork : plenum ( 1987 ) quaglioni , s. , navrtil , p. : phys . lett . *
b652 * , 370 ( 2007 ) entem , d. r. , machleidt , r. : phys . rev . *
c68 * , 041001(r ) ( 2003 ) van kolck , u. : phys . rev .
* c49 * , 2932 ( 1994 ) ; epelbaum , e. , et al .
: phys . rev .
* c66 * , 064001 ( 2002 ) navrtil , p. , et al .
lett . * 99 * , 042501 ( 2007 ) shima , t. , et al . : phys . rev . *
c72 * , 044004 ( 2005 ) ; nillson , b. , et al .
: phys . rev .
* c75 * , 014007 ( 2007 ) ; nakayama , s. , et al .
c76 , 021305(r ) ( 2007 ) bogner , s. k. , kuo , t. t. s. , schwenk , a. : phys . rep .
* 386 * , 1 ( 2003 )
|
explored two avenues for calculations nuclear - reaction properties lorentz integral transform approach resonating - group method application ncsm / lit approach calculation @xmath0he total photo - absorption cross section ncsm / rgm approach application to neutron-@xmath0he scattering performed initio calculation @xmath0he total photo absorption cross section unretarded dipole approximation using high quality nn potential fourth order@xmath1lo chiral effective field theory expansion nnn interaction highest order@xmath3lo ) two low - energy constants short - range nnn interaction selected microscopic treatment continuum problem lit method ncsm approach accurate convergence ncsm expansions reached using three - body effective interactions for nn nnn terms potential results fig. show peak around excitation energy @xmath4 mev peak - height mildly sensitive to nnn force experimental situation in near - threshold region controversial good agreement with photo - disintegration data from bremsstrahlung photons nilsson et indirect measurements nakayama et al reactions two nuclear fragmets rgm many - body wave function expanded binary - cluster channel wave functions @xmath5 = \sum_\nu d\vec{r}\varphi_\nu}\phi\nu\vec @xmath6 @xmath7 antisymmetrizer exchanges nucleons between two clusters antisymmetric relative - motion wave functions @xmath8 depend distance center masses clusters @xmath9 determined solving many - body schrdinger equation hilbert space basis functions @xmath10\varphi_{\nu}(\vec{r} @xmath11 full hamiltonian two integration kernels defined @xmath12 ncsm / rgm approach ncsm wave functions two clusters ncsm effective interactions realistic forces challenging evaluate hamiltonian norm kernels developed formalism cluster states single - nucleon projectile applied scattering low - energy neutrons @xmath0he fig converged @xmath13 phase shift @xmath14he system @xmath15 @xcite potential two - body effective interactions @xmath2eft nn potential @xcite good agreement with experiment work performed under auspices u.department energy lawrence livermore national laboratory contract de - ac52 - 07na27344 support u.s doe sc np work proposal scw0498 department energy grant de - fc02 - 07er41457 acknowledged navrtil p. 84 5728 ( 2000 ) phys . rev c62 054311 ( 2000 ) 88 152502 ( 2002 ) c68 034305 ( 2003 ) efros v b338 130 ( 1994 ) tang y. phys 47 167 ( 1978 ) langanke friedrich advances nuclear physics newyork plenum ( 1987 ) quaglioni navrtil phys b652 370 ( 2007 ) entem machleidt phys rev c68 041001(r ) ( 2003 ) van kolck rev c49 2932 ( 1994 ) epelbaum phys c66 064001 ( 2002 navrtil 99 042501 ( 2007 ) shima phys . rev c72 044004 ( 2005 ) nillson b . rev c75 014007 ( 2007 ) nakayama s.c76 021305(r 2007 ) bogner s k. kuo schwenk phys . rep. 386 2003 )
| 0.25865
| 1,366
| 708
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,846
|
recent calculations [ nilsen et al .
arxiv:1212.5972 ] predict that contributions to the scattered photon spectrum from @xmath0 and @xmath1 bound states in chromium ( @xmath2 ) at metallic density and @xmath3 ev resonate below the respective bound - state thresholds .
these resonances are shown to be closely related to continuum lowering , where @xmath4 bound states in the free atom dissolve into a resonant @xmath5 partial wave in the continuum .
the resulting @xmath6-state resonance dominates contributions to the bound - free dynamic structure function , leading to the predicted resonances in the scattered x - ray spectrum .
similar resonant features are shown to occur in all elements in the periodic table between ca and mn ( @xmath7 ) .
52.25.os : emission , absorption and scattering of radiation , 52.38.-r : laser - plasma interaction , 52.70.-m : plasma diagnostic techniques , 56.65.rr : particle in cell method . as discussed in the accompanying article nilsen et al .
@xcite , resonances in bound - free contributions to thomson scattering of x - rays for a cr plasma can complicate the determination of plasma density and temperature from measurements of the scattered x - ray spectrum .
inasmuch as bound - state features in dense plasmas of lighter elements show up as smooth broad features , it is of interest to explore the origin of the resonances that show up in cr . to this end
, we first note that the free cr atom has the configuration [ ar ] @xmath8 . in a dense plasma ,
the bound electrons outside the ar - like ionic core dissolve into the continuum .
in particular , the @xmath4 electrons in cr form a resonant state near 12 ev above threshold for the conditions comsidered here . it is the contribution of this @xmath6-state resonance that leads to resonances in the thomson scattering cross section . in the following paragraphs , we study these resonances in greater detail for cr and other elements between ca and mn ( @xmath9 )
. .properties of elements @xmath10 at @xmath11 ev .
@xmath12 is the atomic weight , @xmath13 ( g / cc ) is plasma density , @xmath14 and @xmath15 are average - atom eigenvalues ( ev ) of @xmath1 and @xmath0 bound states , @xmath16 and @xmath17 are the number of bound and continuum electrons per ion .
@xmath18 is the average ion charge .
@xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 are the number of continuum electrons in @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath6 states , respectively .
[ tab1 ] [ cols="^,>,>,>,>,>,>",options="header " , ] in table [ tab1 ] , we show results from average - atom calculations of plasmas of elements in row four of the periodic table . in each case
, we assume that the plasma density is the metallic density and that the plasma temperature is @xmath24 ev . in the first four rows of the table
, we list the atomic symbol , atomic number @xmath25 , atomic weight @xmath12 and density @xmath13 ( g / cc ) . in the next two lines ,
we show average - atom eigenvalues @xmath26 and @xmath27 of @xmath0 and @xmath1 states ( ev ) .
the theoretical inner shell ionization thresholds -@xmath28 are 20 - 30% smaller than measured values @xcite .
rows seven and eight list @xmath16 and @xmath17 , the average number of bound and continuum electrons inside the wigner - seitz ( ws ) sphere .
the average - atom model predicts that there are approximately 18 bound electrons and @xmath29 continuum electrons for each element .
the ninth row gives @xmath18 , the average ionic charge or , equivalently , the number of free electrons per ion . for elements listed in the table , @xmath18 , which is near 2 ,
is significantly smaller than @xmath17 owing to the fact that the continuum charge is concentrated inside the ws sphere . in the final three rows of the table , we list @xmath19 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 , contributions to @xmath17 from @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath6 partial waves , respectively .
it should be noted that these three partial - wave contributions account almost completely for @xmath17 .
moreover , for the elements in question , @xmath6-states provide the dominant contribution to the sum . in summary
, the continuum is concentrated inside the ws sphere and is dominated by @xmath6-state partial waves .
-state phase shift @xmath30 and twice the continuum @xmath6-state distribution function @xmath31 are shown as functions of electron energy @xmath32 ( ev ) for 5 ev plasmas at metallic density of elements in row four of the periodic table.[fig1 ] ] in fig .
[ fig1 ] , we plot the @xmath6-state phase shift @xmath30 and the continuum @xmath6-wave distribution inside the ws sphere @xmath31 for elements in table [ tab1 ] .
the distribution function @xmath33 for a continuum state with angular momentum @xmath34 is defined by @xmath35 } } \int_0^{r_{\text{\tiny ws}}}\hspace{-1em } p_{p l}(r)^2 dr , \ ] ] where @xmath36 is the radial wave function for a continuum state with momentum @xmath23 and angular momentum @xmath34 . when integrated over energy , @xmath37 gives the total number of continuum electrons for the @xmath38 partial waves listed in the final three rows of table [ tab1 ] . in all cases , the continuum @xmath6-waves
exhibit resonant behavior near 12 ev , with strong peaks in the distribution functions @xmath33 and corresponding changes in the phase shifts by almost a factor of @xmath39 .
the contribution to the thomson scattering dynamic structure function from bound states @xmath40 is the sum over contributions from individual subshells with quantum numbers @xmath41 : @xmath42 where @xmath43 is the momentum of the continuum electron , @xmath44 is the fractional occupation number of subshell @xmath41 , and @xmath45 and @xmath46 are the momentum and energy transfer from the incident photon @xmath47 to the scattered photon @xmath48 , respectively
. atomic units in which @xmath49 are used here . in eq .
( [ snl ] ) , @xmath50 is an average - atom wave function that approaches a plane wave @xmath51 asymptotically and @xmath52 is the wave function for a bound state with quantum numbers @xmath53 .
the bound - state wave function is expressed in terms of the radial wave function @xmath54 as @xmath55 moreover , the scattering wave function , which consists of a plane wave plus an _ incoming _ spherical wave is expanded as @xmath56 where the radial function @xmath57 is normalized to a phase - shifted sine wave asymptotically : @xmath58 with the above definitions in mind , eq .
( [ snl ] ) can be expressed as @xmath59 where @xmath60 and @xmath61 as shown earlier , the dominant contribution to the continuum wave function @xmath62 is from @xmath6 waves ( @xmath63 ) and occurs near continuum energy @xmath64 ev above threshold .
it follows that the dominant contribution to @xmath65 is from the two terms with @xmath66 and @xmath67 , while the dominant contribution to @xmath68 is from the single term @xmath69 .
energy conservation implies that the resonant contribution to the scattered photon spectrum from bound state @xmath70 occurs at scattered x - ray energy @xmath71 , with @xmath72 ev . for cr at metallic density and @xmath24 ev
is plotted against @xmath73 , where @xmath74 is the scattered photon energy .
the incident photon energy is @xmath75 ev and the scattering angle is 40@xmath76 .
resonance peaks and thresholds associated with transitions from @xmath0 and @xmath1 bound states are shown by the vertical construction lines .
right panel : contributions from bound - free @xmath77 , free - free @xmath78 , and the total structure function @xmath79 , which includes elastic scattering , are plotted against @xmath73 .
[ fig2 ] ] as a specific example , we consider scattering of a 4750 ev photon at 40@xmath76 from cr at metallic density and @xmath24 ev . in the left panel of fig . [ fig2 ] , we show the bound - free contribution @xmath40 to the dynamic structure function .
the vertical construction lines show the @xmath80 and @xmath81 resonance peaks and thresholds .
the resonance peaks are shifted 12 ev below the thresholds of 29.3 and 56.2 ev for the @xmath0 and @xmath1 electrons , respectively , as expected from the position of the peak in @xmath31 shown in the cr panel of fig .
[ fig1 ] .
( short black dashes ) , bound - free contributions including @xmath0 and @xmath1 resonances @xmath40 ( solid blue lines ) and free contributions @xmath82 ( long red dashes ) for scattering from elements listed in table [ tab1 ] are plotted as functions of @xmath73 , where @xmath74 is the scattered x - ray energy and @xmath75 ev is the incident x - ray energy .
the scattering angle for the illustrated cases is 130@xmath76 .
[ fig3 ] ] in fig .
[ fig3 ] , we present results of calculations of the inelastic bound - free contribution to the dynamic structure function @xmath40 , the inelastic free - free contribution @xmath82 and the total dynamic structure function including elastic scattering @xmath83 for elements listed in table [ tab1 ] .
the incident x - ray energy in these examples is @xmath84 ev and the scattering angle is 130@xmath76 .
the relative amplitude of the resonant peaks is seen to increase systematically throughout the sequence as expected from the @xmath6-electron distributions shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] .
by contrast , the relative amplitude of the free - free contribution remains relatively constant from element to element as a consequence of the fact that @xmath18 , the number of free electrons per ion , is relatively constant throughout the sequence . in conclusion , the resonances predicted in the bound - free contribution to the thomson scattering x - ray spectrum arise from a @xmath6-state resonance in the continuum associated with continuum lowering in a dense plasma .
for the examples considered herein , elements between ca and mn at metallic density and @xmath24 ev , the @xmath6-state resonances occur at continuum - electron energy @xmath72 ev . the amplitude of the @xmath6-state resonances increase systematically from element to element .
the @xmath6-state resonance dominate the continuum and the bound - free contribution to the dynamic - structure function @xmath40 .
the resonance associated with transitions from subshell @xmath70 occurs at scattered x - ray energy @xmath85 , where the resonance energy for the cases considered here is @xmath86 ev .
|
the authors owe a debt of gratitude to t. dppner for bringing up the question of the origin of the resonances predicted in average - atom calculations . the work of j.n . and k.t.c .
was performed under the auspices of the u.s.department of energy by lawrence livermore national laboratory under contract de - ac52 - 07na27344 .
|
authors gratitude to dppner for origin resonances average atom calculations work j.n k.t.c performed u.s.department energy lawrence livermore national laboratory contract de - ac52 - 07na27344
| 0.065396
| 78
| 41
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,851
|
the implications of restricting the covariance principle within a gaussian gauge are developed both on a classical and a quantum level .
hence , we investigate the cosmological issues of the obtained schrdinger quantum gravity with respect to the asymptotically early dynamics of a generic universe . a dualism between time and the reference frame fixing is then inferred .
|
a canonical quantum theory for the gravitational field is performed starting from an hamiltonian formulation , hence from the definition of a space - time splitting .
a criticism to this approach is that it is based on the identification of a time - like vector field ; but it is expected that , once the geometry has been quantized , only a probabilistic response can be given for a vector to be time - like or space - like . a physical way to introduce a space - time splitting of the space - time is to include in the dynamics a real fluid . by virtue of the matter - time dualism @xcite , the introduction of matter provides a solution to the time - problem in quantum gravity @xcite . here
the link between the identification of a reference and the appearance of a matter term is investigated from the point of view of lagrangian symmetries .
in particular , we are going to discuss the dynamical implications of the covariance principle when it is restricted to a synchronous frame of reference .
the hamiltonian constraints will be inferred , showing how fixing the reference leads to the materialization of a dust - like contribution .
finally , the description of a generic cosmological model will be given , together with the picture of a quantum to classical transition for the adopted evolutionary approach .
a synchronous ( gaussian ) reference frame is characterized by a metric tensor having the following fixed components @xmath0 and @xmath1 ( @xmath2 ) , as soon as a 3 + 1 splitting @xmath3 of the full space - time manifold is performed .
this feature implies @xmath4 and @xmath5 for the lapse function and for the shift vector , respectively , in the adm formalism .
it can be shown that the synchronous character is preserved by the following set of restricted coordinate transformations @xcite , @xmath6 @xmath7 and @xmath8 being three generic space functions . by restricting the invariance requirement for the lagrangian ,
one finds the following set of constraints , replacing the super - hamiltonian and the super - momentum ones , @xmath9 @xmath10 being a scalar density of weight @xmath11 , hence it can be written as @xmath12 , with @xmath13 a scalar function .
these expressions outline that , while the super - momentum constraint is not modified , in fact the invariance under 3-difeomorphisms still stands , the super - hamiltonian is non - vanishing , in order to preserve the synchronous character of the reference . the modification induced on the form of constraints
can be interpreted as the emergence of a dust fluid co - moving with the slicing , whose energy density is given by the function @xmath13 .
einstein equations underlying such a picture read @xmath14 @xmath15 being orthogonal to the space - like slicing .
one can think at this contribution as the physical realization of the synchronous reference .
however , it is clear that we are not dealing with an external matter field since the energy density @xmath13 is not always positive and @xmath16 is fixed , once initial conditions are assigned on a non - singular hypersurface .
we perform the quantization of the synchronous gravitational field by promoting the 3-geometry @xmath17 and its conjugated momentum @xmath18 to operators acting on the state function @xmath19 in a canonical way , _
@xmath20 the constraints are implemented according with the dirac prescription , hence they read as follows @xmath21 the condition ( [ 2 ] ) implies that the wave functional depends on the 3-geometries @xmath22 , not on 3-metrics .
but a relevant achievement is the relation ( [ 1 ] ) : @xmath23 being the generators of time displacements , it fixes an evolutionary character for wave functional , which can be described by the schrdinger equation @xmath24 therefore , the quantum features of the dust contribution outline its behavior as a clock - like matter .
the next task is to find out a negative portion of the super - hamiltonian spectrum , which allows to interpret the additional contribution as a physical matter field . in this respect ,
a change of variables is performed on the 3-metric and it is written as @xmath25 with @xmath26 and @xmath27 . + this way the hamiltonian density takes the form @xmath28 @xmath29 and @xmath30 being the conjugate momenta to @xmath31 and @xmath32 , respectively . here , the potential term @xmath33 comes from the 3-ricci scalar and @xmath34 refers to first and second order spatial gradients .
in this scheme , equations ( [ 1 ] ) can be written as @xmath35 @xmath36 this equation has a klein - gordon - like structure , hence there exist solutions with negative values of @xmath10 .
it is worth noting that in a synchronous reference the metric determinant always vanishes monotonically at a time @xmath37 where all the geodesics lines cross each other , i.e @xmath38 , with @xmath39 ( as a consequence of the landau - raichoudhuri theorem ) .
this property supports i)@xmath40 as an internal time , ii ) to take the limit @xmath41 , where the system ( [ newhaux ] ) admits an asymptotic solution .
in fact , in this limit , the potential term turns out to be drastically suppressed with respect to the term @xmath42 , thus the dynamics of different spatial points decouples and the quantization can be performed in a local minisuperspace . + an approximated solution
is provided in this scheme , point by point in space , by the following expression @xmath43 @xmath44 and @xmath45 satisfying the two equations respectively @xmath46 the potential results to be negligible , also on a quantum level , when the condition below holds @xmath47 a wider set of wave packets are in agreement with this condition , approaching @xmath48 .
for instance , one of them is characterized by a deviation @xmath49 , where @xmath50 is a small uncertainty around the picked value @xmath51 ( @xmath52 ) .
indeed , this approach works only if @xmath51 is greater than a fiducial one @xmath53 and this is consistent with the prescription that a quantum - classical correspondence stands for high quantum numbers . by writing @xmath54 ,
the function @xmath55 obeys the following equation for the negative part of the spectrum @xmath56
@xmath57 a solution is given for @xmath58 by @xmath59 @xmath60 being the corresponding bessel functions , while @xmath61 and @xmath62 are two integration constants .
therefore , a quantum range of positive energies exists for the dust contribution near enough to the `` singular '' point @xmath63 .
however , there remain some open points : i ) the existence of a stable ground level of negative @xmath10 .
ii ) the inclusion of spatial gradients of the dynamical variables .
iii ) the physical meaning of the limit @xmath64 .
iv ) the behavior of @xmath10 in the classical limit .
most of these issues can be solved in a generic inhomogeneous cosmological setting , where the 3-metric is given by @xmath65 with @xmath66 and @xmath67 six scalar functions and @xmath68 a @xmath69 matrix .
the dynamics of different points decouples near the singularity and the schrdinger functional equation splits to the sum of @xmath70 independent point - like contributions as follows @xcite ( we denote by the subscript @xmath71 any minisuperspace quantity ) @xmath72\psi _ x - \frac{3\hbar ^2}{8\pi } e^{-3\alpha } \partial ^2_{\varphi } \psi _ x - \nonumber\\ - \left ( \frac{1}{2k\mid j\mid ^2}e^{\alpha } v(\beta _ { \pm } ) - \frac{\lambda } { k}e^{3\alpha } \right ) \psi _
\psi _ x = \psi _ x ( t , \ ; \alpha , \ ; \beta _ { \pm } , \ ; \varphi ) \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where a cosmological constant @xmath73 and a scalar field @xmath74 have been added to the dynamical description .
if an integral representation is taken for the wave function @xmath75 @xmath76 where @xmath77 is fixed by the initial conditions at @xmath78 , the dynamics is given by @xmath79 \xi _ x = \mathcal{e}_x\xi _ x \ , .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the expression above , it has been neglected any dependence of @xmath80 on @xmath81 because , asymptotically to the singularity ( @xmath82 ) , it has to be of higher order ( adiabatic approximation ) .
let us now consider wave packets which are flat over the width @xmath83 ( @xmath84 being the standard deviation in the momenta space ) . in the new variable @xmath85 ,
the equation ( [ eigenvp2 ] ) reads @xmath86 a solution to equation ( [ ph9 ] ) is provided by @xmath87 @xmath88 being the characteristic length associated to the universe `` energy '' , while @xmath89 denotes the planck scale length .
however , the validity of the solution above requires the condition @xmath90 .
+ hence , the quantum dynamics in a fixed space point ( _ i.e. _ over a causal portion of the universe ) is described , in the considered approximation ( @xmath91 ) , by a free wave - packet for the variables @xmath92 and @xmath74 and by a profile in @xmath93 which has a maximum in @xmath94 .
if a lattice structure for the space - time is assumed on the planckian scale @xcite , we can take @xmath95 and , noting that @xmath96 , we obtain @xmath97 furthermore , to preserve the reality of @xmath10 , we have to impose that the square root above is real , hence we get @xmath98 . finally , from the request @xmath99 , then the inequality ( [ fininequa ] ) can be written as @xmath100 @xmath101 being the planck mass .
therefore , the existence of a cut - off implies that a ground state exists for the evolutionary approach .
hence it is a natural request to assume the universe to approach this state during its evolution . in order to infer the influence of the dust contribution on the cosmological evolution , we evaluate the associated critical parameter .
being the super - hamiltonian a constant of motion and assuming the universe to be in the ground state , we find @xmath102 , with @xmath103 the present universe radius of curvature . since the actual critical density can be expressed as @xmath104)$ ] ( being @xmath105 the total universe critical parameter ) , then we have @xmath106 therefore , the dust contribution can not play the role of dark matter .
this conclusion can be modified by the introduction of matter from the thermal bath , which could have a relevant interaction with the universe in the trans - planckian region ( see the model addressed in @xcite , where ultrarelativistic matter and a perfect gas were included ) .
we are going to discuss if a scenario can be defined where the transition to a classical regime happens , before the spatial curvature contribution becomes relevant .
this way , the obtained spectrum of @xmath10 would result to be a good approximation during the whole cosmological evolution .
where in the last equation it has been used the identification @xmath112 , coming out from the first one ( which is the hamilton - jacobi equation for the considered system ) .
it is worth noting that the evolution of the wave function @xmath113 is described by a schrdinger equation .
the dynamics for @xmath113 is that of a 3-dimensional non - relativistic free particle with the time variable given by @xmath116 .
hence , if at the initial time @xmath113 is in the form of a sufficiently narrow packet , then it will remain peaked over the whole regime where our approximations hold .
therefore , within the adopted evolutionary approach , _ it can be inferred a quasi - classical description for the universe volume , together with a quantum - like schrdinger dynamics for the anisotropies and the scalar field_. this feature demonstrate that a quantum - classical transition can be defined , where the dust contribution although being relevant during the planckian regime , nevertheless it becomes negligible in the classical phase .
an open point remains the transition to a classical description for anisotropies and the scalar field . in this respect
it could be significant the scalar curvature , which here has been neglected by the approximation scheme .
in fact , such potential terms must approach a quadratic dependence on these variables , which allows to construct stable coherent states .
|
canonical quantum theory for gravitational field from hamiltonian formulation definition space - time splitting criticism based on identification time - like vector field expected geometry quantized probabilistic response for vector time - like space - like introduce space - time splitting include real fluid matter - time dualism introduction of matter solution to time - problem in quantum gravity link between identification reference appearance matter term investigated lagrangian symmetries dynamical implications of covariance principle restricted to synchronous frame of reference hamiltonian constraints inferred fixing reference leads to materialization dust - like contribution description of generic cosmological model quantum to classical transition for evolutionary approach synchronous gaussian ) reference frame characterized by metric tensor fixed components @xmath0 @xmath1 3 + 1 splitting @xmath3 full space - time manifold performed implies @xmath4 and @xmath5 for lapse function shift vector formalism synchronous character preserved by restricted coordinate transformations @xcite @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 three generic space functionsrestricting invariance lagrangian constraints replacing super - hamiltonian super - momentum @xmath9 @xmath10 scalar density weight @xmath11 written as @xmath12 @xmath13 scalar function super - momentum constraint not modified invariance under 3-difeomorphisms stands super - hamiltonian non - vanishing synchronous character modification emergence dust fluid co - moving with slicing energy density given by function @xmath13 einstein equations read @xmath14 @xmath15 orthogonal to space - like slicing physical realization synchronous reference not external matter field energy density @xmath13 not always positive @xmath16 fixed conditions non - singular hypersurface quantization synchronous gravitational field promoting 3-geometry @xmath17 conjugated momentum @xmath18 operators acting state function @xmath19 @xmath20 constraints implemented dirac prescription read @xmath21 condition implies wave functional depends on 3-geometries @xmath22 not 3-metricsrelevant achievement relation @xmath23 generators time displacements fixes evolutionary character for wave functional described by schrdinger equation @xmath24 quantum features dust contribution behavior clock - like matter next task find negative portion super - hamiltonian spectrum additional contribution as physical matter field change of variables performed on 3-metric written as @xmath25 with @xmath26 @xmath27 hamiltonian density form @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 conjugate momenta to @xmath31 @xmath32 potential term @xmath33 from 3-ricci scalar @xmath34 refers to first second order spatial gradients equations written as @xmath35 @xmath36 klein - gordon - like structure solutions with negative values of @xmath10 synchronous reference determinant vanishes @xmath37 geodesics lines cross @xmath38 @xmath39 landau - raichoudhuri theorem property supports@xmath40 internal time limit @xmath41 admits asymptotic solution potential term suppressed term @xmath42 dynamics of spatial points decouples quantization performed in local minisuperspaceapproximated solution provided by expression @xmath43 satisfying equations @xmath46 potential results negligible quantum condition holds @xmath47 wave packets approaching @xmath48 deviation @xmath49 @xmath50 uncertainty around value @xmath51 approach works if @xmath51 greater than fiducial @xmath53 consistent with quantum - classical correspondence high quantum numbers writing @xmath54 function @xmath55 obeys equation for negative part spectrum @xmath56 solution for @xmath58 by @xmath59 @xmath60 corresponding bessel functions @xmath61 @xmath62 integration constants quantum range of positive energies exists for dust contribution singular point @xmath63 open points stable ground level of negative @xmath10 spatial gradients dynamical variables physical meaning of limit @xmath64 behavior of @xmath10 in classical limit issues solved in inhomogeneous cosmological setting 3-metric given by @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 six scalar functions @xmath68 @xmath69 matrixdynamics points decouples near singularity schrdinger equation splits to sum @xmath70 contributions @xcite @xmath71 minisuperspace quantity @xmath72\psi _ x - \frac{3\hbar{8\pi{-3\alpha }\varphi } \psi _ x -\nonumber\\ -\left\frac{1}{2k\mid{\alpha }\beta \pm -\frac{\lambda }{3\alpha }\right ) \psi _ _ x = \psi _ x\alpha \beta \pm\varphi cosmological constant @xmath73 scalar field @xmath74 added to dynamical description integral representation for wave function @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 fixed by initial conditions @xmath78 dynamics by @xmath79 \xi _ x = \mathcal{e}_x\xi _ x neglected dependence of @xmath80 on @xmath81 higher order consider wave packets flat over width @xmath83 @xmath84 standard deviation momenta spacenew variable @xmath85 equation eigenvp2 reads @xmath86 solution to equation ph9 provided by @xmath87 @xmath88 characteristic length universe energy @xmath89 planck scale length validity solution requires condition @xmath90 quantum dynamics fixed space point causal portion universe described @xmath91 by free wave - packet variables @xmath92 @xmath74 profile @xmath93 maximum in @xmath94 lattice structure space - time assumed planckian scale take @xmath95 obtain @xmath97 preserve reality @xmath10 impose square root above real get @xmath98 request @xmath99 inequality [ fininequa ] written as @xmath100 @xmath101 planck mass existence cut - off implies ground state evolutionary approach assume universe approach state during evolution infer influence dust contribution cosmological evolution evaluate critical parameter super - hamiltonian constant of motion universe ground state find @xmath102 @xmath103 present universe radius of curvature actual critical density expressed as @xmath104)$ @xmath105 total universe critical parameter have @xmath106 dust contribution not play role dark matterconclusion modified by introduction matter from thermal bath interaction with universe trans - planckian region model in @xcite ultrarelativistic matter perfect gas included discuss scenario transition to classical regime before spatial curvature contribution relevant obtained spectrum of @xmath10 good approximation during cosmological evolution last equation used identification @xmath112 from first one hamilton - jacobi equation system evolution of wave function @xmath113 described by schrdinger equation dynamics for @xmath113 3-dimensional non - relativistic free particle time variable by @xmath116 if initial time @xmath113 narrow packet peaked over regime approximations hold adopted evolutionary approach inferred quasi - classical description for universe volume quantum - like schrdinger dynamics for anisotropies scalar field quantum - classical transition defined dust contribution relevant during planckian regime negligible in classical phase open point transition to classical description for anisotropies scalar field significant scalar curvature neglected by approximation scheme potential terms quadratic dependence on variables stable coherent states
| 0.435254
| 2,842
| 1,486
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,854
|
we study the kpz equation ( in @xmath0 = @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 spatial dimensions ) by using a rsos discretization of the surface .
we measure the critical exponents very precisely , and we show that the rational guess is not appropriate , and that @xmath4 is not the upper critical dimension .
we are also able to determine very precisely the exponent of the sub - leading scaling corrections , that turns out to be close to @xmath5 in all cases .
we introduce and use a _ multi - surface coding _
technique , that allow a gain of order @xmath6 over usual numerical simulations .
|
the kpz equation @xcite , in its apparent simplicity , involves many issues that need clarification .
the continuum equation ( that describes the local growth of an interface profile ) is @xmath7 the real behavior of this equation is not well understood .
the absence of a complete mean field theory does not help , and the fact that we have do understand the effects of a strong coupling fixed point makes very difficult the development of a perturbative renormalization approach . a practical approach for numerical studied of the problem is to consider lattice restricted solid on solid ( rsos ) surfaces ( see for example @xcite for a review ) : one considers a discretized height field on a @xmath0 dimensional lattice , and imposes the constrain that the absolute value of the distance among two neighboring surface elements can only take the values zero and one
. old extensive numerical simulations @xcite do not clarify the situation completely . after a number of interesting field theoretical results @xcite , the introduction of new renormalization group based techniques is a potentially promising direction of development @xcite .
the main theoretical points which still deserve proper explanation are two : it is still not clear whether equation ( [ kpz_equation ] ) has a finite upper critical dimension ( @xmath8 ) or not , and the exact quantification of the related critical exponents .
regarding arguments in favor of @xmath9 we address the reader to @xcite , while arguments supporting @xmath10 can be found in @xcite .
in this light we introduce here a new numerical technique and present some precise numerical simulations that allow us to estimate critical exponents .
thanks to the new , precise technique we succeed to clarify some questions : we show for example that a conjecture of @xcite is not founded , and we give quantitative estimates about the behavior of sub - leading corrections .
the precise results on which this paper is based are due to a new technique we introduce to simulate rsos surfaces , where adjacent elements of the surface can only be at a distance of @xmath5 , @xmath11 or @xmath12 lattice spacings .
the technique is a generalization of the so called _ multi - spin coding _
technique ( well discussed by rieger @xcite in the context of the study of disordered systems ) , where , by using the fact that the @xmath13 spins can be represented by boolean logical variables , one stores @xmath14 copies of the system in one single computer word ( we will assume in the following we are using a @xmath14 bit computer ) .
the main idea is that we can simulate , basically at the cost of one single usual simulation , @xmath14 copies of the system , by rewriting the basic operations ( like summing spins for computing the effective force ) as boolean operations , and by exploiting the fact that when , for example , the computer is calculating a logical bit @xmath15 it is indeed doing that @xmath14 times at once .
the gain of such an approach over an usual single spin simulation is of order @xmath6 : one gains a factor @xmath14 for the number of systems that updates at once , and looses a factor of order @xmath1 in computational complexity ( adding the spin in the boolean form takes some more time @xcite ) .
we generalize here the ising case to the case of a _ field of differences _ , that can have three values , since a given element of the surface can be at the same height of a given neighbor , or one step behind it , or one step ahead of it .
the method is new as applied to such a system , where one does not have to compute the value of an energy , but uses the boolean operations to determine if the element can be moved without violating the geometrical constraint .
let us thinks for simplicity about @xmath16 , where we have a @xmath16 support where a height field ( the surface height ) @xmath17 is defined .
one surface element @xmath18 has @xmath19 first neighbors : in the rsos model the difference @xmath20 , where @xmath21 , can only take the three values @xmath12 , @xmath11 and @xmath22 . we store the @xmath23 values of the @xmath24 ( and , as we will discuss better ,
each @xmath24 needs two bit to be stored .
this is a redundant way to store the information , since a factor two in memory could be easily saved , but it is very convenient from the point of view of computer time : as usual one trades memory for time , and avoids a cumbersome reconstruction by storing more information ) .
if a given element is behind its neighbor the difference is @xmath12 , if it has the same height than the neighbor the difference is @xmath11 , while if it is ahead of the neighbor the difference is @xmath22 . since we have three allowed values we can represent each of these difference with two bits ( that we will call respectively @xmath25 , high bit , and @xmath26 , low bit ) : we can for example code with @xmath27 the situation where the given element is behind its neighbor , with @xmath28 the situation where they have the same height , and with @xmath29 the situation where it is ahead ( the value @xmath30 is forbidden ) .
if the element is ahead of even a single one of the @xmath16 neighbors the move is forbidden ( it would violate the rsos constrain ) .
it is clear this is easily implemented in our coding : one just needs to do a logical @xmath31 of the @xmath16 @xmath25 bits related to the site @xmath32 , and if it is @xmath5 at least one of the neighbors is behind and the move is not allowed .
let us see better why .
we start comparing our element @xmath32 to the first of its @xmath19 neighbors ( let us say the one in the positive direction @xmath22 ) : if @xmath32 is ahead the neighbor the relevant @xmath25 bit ( that we have stored in @xmath33 ) is @xmath5 , and we already know we can not move . if @xmath32 is on the contrary at the same height of the neighbor or behind it we have that , as far as this neighbor is concerned , the element @xmath32 can advance of one unit .
now we look at the second neighbor , where the same reasoning holds : if we look at the logical @xmath31 of the two relevant high bit we will find that we can not move if this quantity is one .
looking at all the @xmath16 neighbor we see that the move is forbidden if the logical @xmath31 of the @xmath16 @xmath25 bit is @xmath5 : clearly this operation , as all the other present in the core of the code , updates with a single computer cycle the @xmath14 copies of the system . after doing that ,
if the element @xmath32 can not be moved there is nothing that has be done : if it gets moved we have to update the @xmath24 related to the site @xmath32 and to the neighbors , to describe the new situation .
the codes simulating systems in a different number of spatial dimensions ( in our case from @xmath34 to @xmath35 ) are simple generalization one of the other ( when adding a dimension one has to add checks on the new neighbors and their update ) . as usual in these kind of simulations the random noise is implemented with a random choice of the site to be updated .
we also implement a fifty percent probability of really updating a surface element that according to the rsos constrain could be updated .
this is very important , since starting from random independent surfaces is not enough : because of our parallel scheme the sites of our @xmath14 copies have to be updated in the same order , and such an updating algorithm with updating probability one is attractive , and the @xmath14 configurations asymptotically at large times become equal @xcite .
the probability of not accepting an allowing change , that depends on each of the @xmath14 configurations , solve this problem .
we are aware of a parallel algorithm to update surfaces @xcite : it is very different in spirit from our algorithm ( since it parallelizes on different sites of the lattice ) .
we have not compared in detail the performances of the two algorithms , but we believe that on one side the algorithm of @xcite is more general , and not limited to rsos models , but on the other side our algorithms is more regular ( there are no exceptional loops ) , and is probably better performing for the model we study .
we have based this work on numerical simulations of lattices of volume @xmath36 .
the spatial dimensionality @xmath0 is the spatial support , where a @xmath5 dimensional surface take values .
we study the @xmath34 , @xmath37 and @xmath35 cases . at a given time @xmath38 of the dynamical evolution
the position of the surface can be expressed by the values @xmath39 ( that we reconstruct by the differences we store in our code , see the former section ) .
@xmath32 represents , in lexicografic order , a @xmath0-ple labeling the spatial sites .
we consider a dynamics which generates a restricted solid on solid ( rsos ) growth : distances of first neighboring elements of the surface can not be larger than one . at each trial step
we move elements of the surface that are not constrained not to do so because of the rsos restriction with probability @xmath40 : we have to use a probability different from one in order to keep independent the different surfaces we simulate in the same computer word .
we consider a large number of different lattice sizes . in @xmath34
we take @xmath26 going from @xmath41 to @xmath42 , in @xmath37 we consider @xmath26 going from @xmath41 to @xmath43 while in @xmath35 @xmath26 goes from @xmath41 to @xmath44 .
all our data have been averaged over @xmath14 different dynamical runs . .
number of full lattice sweeps for each run on different lattice sizes and number of dimensions .
[ tab - one ] [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] our recent are not incompatible with the recent ones of @xcite , but our small error bars allow us to reach precise conclusions .
also the comparison with the exponents found in @xcite is fair : we have stressed the length of our runs , in order to be able to give a clean estimate of the time asymptotic behavior , so that our result is hopefully unbiased .
the numerical technique we have introduced works well , and has allowed us to run very precise numerical simulations with a limited amount of computer time ( a few months of pentium ii processor ) .
we have been able to determine critical exponents of the kpz universality class with high accuracy .
we have falsified the guess that the exponents are simple rational numbers .
it is also unambiguous from our data that the upper critical dimension is larger than @xmath3 ( as opposed to the claims of @xcite ) .
thanks to our precise measurements ( and fitting together the first @xmath2 non trivial moments of @xmath45 ) we have also been able to determine the exponent @xmath46 of the first non - leading scaling corrections .
it is interesting to notice that the estimated value of @xmath46 is always very close to @xmath5 , independent from the dimensionality of the system .
the next interesting step , following the approach of @xcite , would be to try and implement a systematic monte carlo renormalization group : the multi - surface coding technique we have discussed could be a very important ingredient of such a development .
for the numerical simulations described here we have used the _ kalix2 _
parallel computer ( built on pentium ii chips ) , funded by italian murst 1998 cofin .
we thank claudio castellano and matteo marsili for interesting discussions , and marcel den nijs and kay wiese for a relevant correspondence . c. castellano , m. marsili and l. pietronero , phys .
* 80 * ( 1998 ) 3527 , cond - mat/9802284 ; c. castellano , a. gabrielli , m. marsili , m. a. muoz and l. pietronero , phys .
e * 58 * ( 1998 ) r5209 , cond - mat/9809197 ; c. castellano , m. marsili , m. a. muoz and l. pietronero , cond - mat/9904434 .
ballesteros , l. a. fernandez , v. martin - mayor and a. munoz - sudupe , phys .
b * 387 * ( 1996 ) 125 ; h.g .
ballesteros , l. a. fernandez , v. martin - mayor , a. munoz - sudupe , g. parisi and j.j .
ruiz - lorenzo , phys .
b * 58 * ( 1998 ) 2740 .
|
kpz equation @xcite involves issues clarification continuum equation local growth interface profile is @xmath7 real behavior not understood absence of complete mean field theory effects strong coupling fixed point difficult perturbative renormalization approach practical approach consider lattice restricted solid on solid rsos surfaces see @xcite review considers discretized height field on @xmath0 dimensional lattice constrain absolute value distance among two neighboring surface elements can only take values zero and one old numerical simulations clarify results new renormalization group based techniques promising direction main theoretical points explanation two clear equation kpz_equation has finite upper critical dimension ( @xmath8 ) exact quantification of related critical exponents arguments in favor of @xmath9 @xcite arguments supporting @xmath10 in @xcite introduce new numerical technique present precise simulations estimate critical exponents new technique questions show conjecture of @xcite not founded give quantitative estimates about behavior of sub - leading corrections precise results due to new technique to simulate rsos surfaces adjacent elements only at distance of @xmath5 @xmath11 or @xmath12 lattice spacingstechnique generalization of multi - spin coding technique discussed by rieger study disordered systems using @xmath13 spins represented by boolean logical variables stores @xmath14 copies system in one computer word using @xmath14 bit computer idea simulate at cost of one simulation @xmath14 copies system rewriting basic operations like summing spins force as boolean operations exploiting computer calculating logical bit @xmath15 @xmath14 times at once gain over single spin simulation gains factor @xmath14 for number of systems updates looses factor @xmath1 in computational complexity adding spin in boolean form takes more time generalize case to _ field of differences _ three values element surface can be at same height of neighbor or behind ahead method new applied to system compute value energy uses boolean operations to determine if element moved without violating geometrical constraint about @xmath16 @xmath16 support height field surface height ) @xmath17 defined one surface element @xmath18 has @xmath19 first neighbors in rsos model difference @xmath20 @xmath21 can take three values @xmath12, @xmath11 @xmath22 store @xmath23 values of @xmath24 ( each @xmath24 needs two bit redundant way store information factor two in memory could saved convenient computer time trades memory for time avoids cumbersome reconstruction storing more information if element behind neighbor difference is @xmath12 same height difference @xmath11 ahead neighbor difference @xmath22 three allowed values represent each difference with two bits @xmath25 , high bit and @xmath26 , low bit ) code with @xmath27 situation element behind neighbor @xmath28 same height @xmath29 ahead value @xmath30 forbidden ) if element ahead of @xmath16 neighbors move forbidden violate rsos constrain ) easily implemented in coding needs do logical @xmath31 of @xmath16 @xmath25 bits related to site @xmath32 if @xmath5 one neighbors behind move not allowed start comparing element @xmath32 to first @xmath19 neighbors positive direction @xmath22 if @xmath32 ahead neighbor relevant @xmath25 bit stored in @xmath33 ) is @xmath5 can not move if @xmath32 contrary at same height neighbor or behind element @xmath32 can advance one unit look at second neighbor same reasoning holds logical @xmath31 of two relevant high bit can not move if quantity is one @xmath16 neighbor move forbidden if logical @xmath31 of @xmath16 @xmath25 bit is @xmath5 operation updates single @xmath14 copies system if element @xmath32 not be moved nothing done if moved update @xmath24 related to site @xmath32 neighbors new situation codes simulating systems in different spatial dimensions from @xmath34 to @xmath35 ) simple generalization adding dimension checks on new neighbors update random noise implemented with random choice of site updated implement fifty percent probability of updating surface element updated important starting from random independent surfaces not enough parallel scheme sites of @xmath14 copies be updated same order updating algorithm with updating probability one attractive @xmath14 configurations times become equal @xcite probability of not accepting allowing change depends on @xmath14 configurations problem aware of parallel algorithm to update surfaces @xcite different spirit from our algorithm parallelizes on different sites of latticenot compared performances two algorithms believe algorithm @xcite general not limited to rsos models our algorithms more regular no exceptional loops better performing for model study based work on simulations of lattices volume @xmath36 spatial dimensionality @xmath0 is spatial support @xmath5 dimensional surface values study @xmath34 @xmath35 cases @xmath38 position surface expressed by values @xmath39 reconstruct differences in code @xmath32 represents @xmath0-ple labeling spatial sites consider dynamics restricted solid on solid rsos growth distances of neighboring elements surface not larger than one each trial step move elements surface not constrained rsos restriction with probability @xmath40 use probability different keep independent different surfaces consider different lattice sizes @xmath34 @xmath26 from @xmath41 to @xmath42 @xmath37 @xmath26 @xmath41 to @xmath43 @xmath35 @xmath26 from @xmath41 to @xmath44 data averaged over @xmath14 dynamical runs full lattice sweeps different lattice sizes dimensionstab - one ] cols="^,^,^",options="header " recent not incompatible with @xcite small error bars allow precise conclusions comparison with exponents @xcite fair stressed length runs clean estimate of time asymptotic behavior result unbiased numerical technique introduced works precise simulations with limited computer time pentium ii processor critical exponents kpz universality class high accuracy falsified exponents simple rational numbers unambiguous upper critical dimension larger than @xmath3 claims @xcite precise measurements @xmath2 moments @xmath45 exponent @xmath46 of first non - leading scaling corrections estimated value of @xmath46 close to @xmath5 independent from dimensionality system next step implement systematic monte carlo renormalization group multi - surface coding technique important numerical simulations used _ kalix2 _ parallel computer pentium ii chips funded by italian murst 1998 cofin thank claudio castellano matteo marsili for discussions marcel den nijs kay wiese for correspondence c. castellano. marsili l. pietronero phys . * 80 * ( 1998 ) 3527 , cond - mat/9802284 ;.castellano gabrielli marsili muoz pietronero phys 58 1998 ) r5209 cond - mat/9809197 castellano marsili muoz pietronero cond - mat/9904434 ballesteros fernandez martin - mayor munoz - sudupe phys 387 1996 ) 125 ballesteros fernandez - mayor munoz - sudupe parisi ruiz - lorenzo 58 * 1998 ) 2740
| 0.439241
| 2,822
| 1,475
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,858
|
we compute @xmath0 for two flavors of light dynamical quarks using non - perturbatively @xmath1 improved wilson fermions .
we improve on a recent calculation by employing pad - improved two - loop and three - loop perturbation theory to convert the lattice numbers to the @xmath2 scheme .
|
the running of the strong coupling constant @xmath3 is parameterized by the @xmath4 parameter . in a recent letter
@xcite we have computed @xmath0 from the average plaquette and the scale parameter @xmath5 . an essential step in our calculation was the conversion of the boosted coupling @xmath6 to the renormalized coupling @xmath7 .
this was done in two - loop tadpole improved perturbation theory , which resulted in an ( estimated ) systematic uncertainty of the order of the statistical error .
we can do better now . in this talk
we shall apply pad techniques to approximate an unknown three - loop coefficient in the conversion formula .
this reduces the systematic uncertainty to an insignificant amount , as we shall see .
the calculation of @xmath0 proceeds in three steps : first we compute the average plaquette @xmath8 from which we obtain @xmath6 , @xmath9 where @xmath10 is the bare lattice coupling .
note that the non - perturbative contribution to the plaquette , i.e. the difference between the lattice number and the perturbative series , is less than @xmath11 @xcite . in the second step
we compute @xmath7 from @xmath6 .
this is the main task . to three loops we obtain , following the notation of @xcite , @xmath12 where @xmath13 .
we know all coefficients except for @xmath14 .
( see @xcite for references . )
the latter can be computed from the difference of the four - loop coefficients , @xmath15 , of the @xmath16 function @xmath17 where @xmath18 denotes the scheme .
we find @xmath19 we know @xmath20 , but we do not know @xmath21 . in the @xmath2 scheme
the four - loop @xmath16 function turns out to be very well reproduced by the pad - improved three - loop @xmath16 function @xmath22}^{\mathcal s}(g_{\mathcal s } ) = -g_{\mathcal s}^3 \frac{b_0b_1+(b_1 ^ 2-b_0b_2^{\mathcal s})g_{\mathcal s}^2}{b_1-b_2^{\mathcal s } g_{\mathcal s}^2}. \label{pade}\ ] ] in fig .
1 we compare ( [ pade ] ) with the four - loop expression .
we see that in the region @xmath23 , which is the region relevant to our calculation , the pad - improved three - loop result differs by less than @xmath24 from the four - loop result .
we expect that the same is true for the boosted @xmath16 function @xmath25 , which converges at a similar rate as @xmath26 .
thus we may approximate @xmath25 by @xmath27}^\square$ ] .
expanding ( [ pade ] ) gives us then @xmath28 we can improve the convergence of the series ( [ boxcon ] ) further by re - expressing it in terms of the tadpole improved coefficients @xmath29 this amounts , for example , to replacing every @xmath30 by @xmath31 we have already seen in @xcite that tadpole improvement reduces the coefficients of the two - loop fermionic contribution .
we find that tadpole improvement is equally successful in reducing the coefficients of the three - loop contributions .
in the final step we compute @xmath0 from @xmath32 using the renormalization group equation @xmath33 for @xmath26 we use the pad - improved four - loop @xmath16 function @xmath34}^{\overline{ms}}\,(g_{\overline{ms}})&= & - g^3_{\overline{ms } } \big(b_0\,(b_1 ^ 2-b_0b_2^{\overline{ms}})+(b_1 ^ 3 \nonumber\\ & - & 2b_0b_1b_2^{\overline{ms } } + b_0 ^ 2\,b_3^{\overline{ms}})\,g^2_{\overline{ms}}\big)\big/ \big(b_1 ^ 2 \nonumber \\ & - & b_0b_2^{\overline{ms } } + ( b_0b_3^{\overline{ms } } - b_1b_2)\,g^2_{\overline{ms } } \nonumber \\ & + & ( b_2^{\overline{ms}\ , 2 } -b_1b_3^{\overline{ms}})\ , g^4_{\overline{ms}}\big ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] which is a better approximation than the four - loop @xmath16 function .
the result should be independent of @xmath35 if our approximations of @xmath26 in ( [ boxcon ] ) and ( [ conv ] ) are consistent .
we have varied @xmath35 between 4 and 10 gev and found indeed that @xmath0 changes by a fraction of a percent only .
finally we have chosen @xmath36 , which corresponds to @xmath37 gev .
we may estimate the error arising from our approximation ( [ b3 ] ) by replacing @xmath20 by @xmath38 as well .
we found that this changes our results by at most @xmath39 . [ cols="^,^,^,^,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] to convert our numbers to a physical scale we have used the force parameter @xmath5 .
the results are presented in table 1 .
the numbers have increased by @xmath40 relative to our previous values @xcite , which is well inside the systematic error that was estimated in that paper .
we fit our data by @xmath41 ( for details of the fit see @xcite . ) in fig .
2 we show @xmath42 and @xmath43 which , if the fit is successful , should collapse the data points onto a single line each .
we see that this is indeed the case .
we also see that the largest uncertainty arises from the continuum extrapolation , while the data depend only weakly on the quark mass . in the chiral and continuum
limit our fit gives @xmath44 ( @xmath45 ) .
using @xmath46 fm , we finally obtain @xmath47 this is to be compared with our previous result @xmath48 .
our calculation faces two problems .
one is the conversion from the boosted to the @xmath2 scheme . the other is the extrapolation to the chiral and continuum limit .
we have solved the first problem , and with time and more data we hope to improve on the extrapolation .
|
strong coupling constant @xmath3 parameterized by @xmath4 recent letter computed @xmath0 from average plaquette scale parameter @xmath5 essential step conversion boosted coupling @xmath6 to renormalized coupling @xmath7 two - loop tadpole perturbation theory resulted systematic uncertainty statistical error better apply pad techniques approximate unknown three - loop coefficient conversion formula reduces systematic uncertainty insignificant calculation @xmath0 three steps compute average plaquette @xmath8 obtain @xmath6 @xmath9 @xmath10 bare lattice coupling non - perturbative contribution plaquette difference less than @xmath11 second step compute @xmath7 from @xmath6 main task three loops obtain @xmath12 @xmath13 know all coefficients except @xmath14 latter computed from difference four - loop coefficients @xmath15 @xmath16 function @xmath17 @xmath18 denotes scheme find @xmath19 know @xmath20 know @xmath21@xmath2 scheme four - loop @xmath16 function reproduced pad - improved three - loop @xmath16 function @xmath22\mathcal s}(g = -g_{\mathcal s}^3{b_0b_1+_0b_2^{\mathcal s} s}^2_2 s fig . 1 pade four - loop expression region @xmath23 relevant pad - improved three - loop result differs less than @xmath24 four - loop result same boosted @xmath16 function @xmath25 converges similar rate as @xmath26 approximate @xmath25 by @xmath27}^\square$ expanding pade ] gives @xmath28 improve convergence series re - expressing tadpole improved coefficients @xmath29 replacing @xmath30 by @xmath31 tadpole improvement reduces coefficients two - loop fermionic contribution coefficients three - loop contributionscompute @xmath0 from @xmath32 renormalization group equation @xmath33 for @xmath26 use improved four - loop @xmath16 function @xmath34\overline{ms}} g^3_(b_0 2-b_0b_2^{\overline{ms}} 3 2b_0b_1b_2^{\overline{ms 2_3^{\overline^2_{\overline{ms}}\big(b_1 2\nonumber b_0b_2^{\overline{ms b_0b_3^{\overline b_1b_2)\,g^2_{\overline{ms\nonumber b_2^{\overline -b_1b_3^{\overline g^4_{\overline{ms}}{aligned better approximation than four - loop @xmath16 function result independent of @xmath35 if approximations @xmath26 consistent varied @xmath35 between 4 10 gev @xmath0 changes fraction of percent chosen @xmath36 corresponds to @xmath37 gev estimate error replacing @xmath20 by @xmath38 changes results by @xmath39 cols="^<",options="header " convert numbers to physical scale used force parameter @xmath5 results in table 1 numbers increased by @xmath40 previous values inside systematic error fit data by @xmath41 details see @xcite fig . 2 @xmath42 and @xmath43 if fit successful collapse data points single line largest uncertainty from continuum extrapolation data depend on quark mass chiral continuum limit fit gives @xmath44 ( @xmath45 ) using @xmath46 fm obtain @xmath47 compared with previous result @xmath48 calculation faces two problems conversion from boosted to @xmath2 scheme extrapolation to chiral continuum limit solved first problem with time data improve extrapolation
| 0.260547
| 1,498
| 798
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,860
|
the damped and sub - damped lyman-@xmath0(dla and sub - dla ) systems seen in the spectra of qsos offer a unique way to study the interstellar medium of high redshift galaxies . in this paper
we report on new abundance determinations in a sample of 10 new systems , nine of the lesser studied sub - dlas and one dla , along the line of sight to seven qsos from spectra taken with the mike spectrograph .
lines of mg i , mg ii , al ii , al iii , ca ii , mn ii , fe ii , and zn ii were detected . here , we give the column densities and equivalent widths of the observed absorption lines , as well as the abundances determined for these systems .
zn , a relatively undepleted element in the local interstellar medium ( ism ) is detected in one system with a high metallicity of [ zn / h]=+0.27@xmath10.18 .
in one other system , a high abundance based on the more depleted element fe is seen with [ fe / h]=@xmath2 , although zn is not detected .
the n@xmath3-weighted mean metallicity of these sub - dla systems based on fe is @xmath4[fe / h]@xmath5=@xmath6 , nearly @xmath70.7 dex higher ( a factor of 5 ) than what is seen in dlas in this redshift range .
the relative abundance of [ mn / fe ] is also investigated .
a clear trend is visible for these systems as well as systems from the literature , with [ mn / fe ] increasing with increasing metallicity in good agreement with with milky way stellar abundances .
[ firstpage ] quasars : absorption lines - ism : abundances
|
quasar absorption line systems with strong lyman-@xmath0 lines are often divided into two classes : damped lyman-@xmath0 ( dlas , log n@xmath3@xmath8 20.3 ) and sub - damped lyman-@xmath0 ( sub - dla 19 @xmath9 log n@xmath3@xmath10 20.3 , @xcite ) which contain a major fraction of the neutral gas in the universe , while the majority of the baryons are thought to lie in the highly ionized and diffuse lyman-@xmath0 forest clouds with log n@xmath3@xmath9 15 in intergalactic space @xcite .
the lower threshold of log n@xmath3=20.3 for classification of dlas stems from previous 21 cm emission studies of nearby spirals , where the sensitivity limited column density of log n@xmath3@xmath720.3 was seen to lie near the holmberg radius ( r@xmath11 ) of the galaxy @xcite .
nonetheless , the damping wings which can be used to accurately measure n@xmath3 in these systems do begin the sub - dla regime of log n@xmath3@xmath1219.0 . with their high gas content , the dla and sub - dla systems
are believed to be associated directly with galaxies at all redshifts in which they are seen . among the many elements often detected in qso absorber systems including c , n , o , mg , si , s , ca , ti , cr , mn , fe , ni , and zn , zn is the preferred tracer of the gas - phase metallicity as it is relatively undepleted in the galactic ism , especially when the fraction of h in molecular form is low , as is the case in most dlas .
zn also tracks the fe abundance in galactic stars ( e.g. , @xcite ) , and the lines of zn ii @xmath132026,2062 are relatively weak and typically unsaturated . these lines can be covered with ground based spectroscopy over a wide range of redshifts , 0.65 @xmath9 z @xmath9 3.5 , which covers a large portion ( @xmath14 ) of the history of the universe .
abundances of refractory elements such as cr and fe relative to zn also give a measure of the amount of dust depletion @xcite .
abundance ratios such as [ si / fe ] , [ o / fe ] and [ mn / fe ] shed light on the enrichment from the different types of supernovae , as the @xmath0-capture elements si and o for example are produces mainly in type ii explosions while the iron peak elements are produced mainly by type ia supernovae . in previous studies ,
dla systems have been the preferred systems for chemical abundance investigation owing to their high gas content @xcite .
most dlas however have been found to be metal poor , typically far below the solar level and below where models predict the mean metallicity should be at the corresponding redshifts at which they are seen ( e.g. , @xcite and references therein ) .
the sub - dla systems have until recently been largely ignored , with their contribution to the overall metal budget unknown .
evidence for the possibility of a non - negligible contribution from sub - dlas to the metal budget came from @xcite , who noted that based on fe ii lines the sub - dla systems have faster evolution of the fe abundance and higher abundances on average than dla systems .
this has also been validated by @xcite .
galactic chemical evolution is a slow process , and long timescales must be examined to search for the signs of the gradual chemical enrichment that models predict @xcite . although redshifts @xmath15 span 70@xmath16 of the age of the universe ( using a concordance cosmology of @xmath17 , h@xmath18=70 km s@xmath19mpc@xmath19 ) , few observations have been made of @xmath15 sub - dlas due to the lack of spectrographs with enough sensitivity in short wavelengths and the paucity of known sub - dlas in this redshift range .
with such a large fraction of the age of the universe covered in the redshift regime , it is clearly important for understanding the nature of sub - dla systems and galactic chemical evolution as well .
we have greatly increased the sample of sub - dlas in past several years with our vlt uves and magellan - ii mike spectra . in this paper
, we report on ten new systems observed with the mike spectrograph on the magellan - ii clay telescope .
the structure of this paper is as follows : in @xmath20 [ sec : obs ] , we discuss details of our observations and data reduction techniques . @xmath20
[ sec : objects ] gives details on the individual objects in these new observations .
@xmath20 [ sec : mnfe ] investigates the ratio of [ mn / fe ] in qso absorbers . in @xmath20
[ sec : abund ] we discuss the abundances of these absorbers and we give a brief discussion .
we also provide an appendix at the end of this paper , showing plots of the uv spectra with the fits to the lyman-@xmath0 lines , and tables containing the fit parameters for the individual systems .
the observations presented here were made with the 6.5 m magellan - ii clay telescope and the magellan inamori kyocera echelle ( mike ) spectrograph @xcite in 2007 sep .
this is a double sided spectrograph with both a blue and a red camera , providing for simultaneous wavelength coverage from @xmath73340 to @xmath79400 .
targets were observed in multiple exposures of 1800 to 2700 sec each to minimize cosmic ray defects .
the seeing was typically @xmath10 1@xmath21 , averaging @xmath7 0.7@xmath21 .
all of the target qsos were observed with the 1@xmath21x5@xmath21 slit and the spectra were binned 2x3 ( spatial by spectral ) during readout .
the resolving power of the mike spectrograph is @xmath719,000 and @xmath725,000 on the red and blue sides respectively with a 1@xmath21 slit .
table 1 gives a summary of the observations .
these spectra were reduced using the mike pipeline reduction code in idl developed by s. burles , j. x. prochaska , and r. bernstein .
wavelengths were calibrated using a th - ar comparison lamp taken after each exposure .
the data were first bias subtracted from the overscan region and flat - fielded .
the data were then sky - subtracted and the spectral orders were extracted using the traces from flat field images .
these extracted spectra were then corrected for heliocentric velocities and converted to vacuum wavelengths .
each individual order was then combined in iraf using rejection parameters to reduce the effects of cosmic rays .
these combined spectra were then normalized using a polynomial , typically of order five or less , or spline function to fit the continuum .
our new observations consists of 10 absorbers , nine sub - dlas and one dla z@xmath22@xmath9 1.5 .
see @xcite for a discussion of our selection criteria . throughout this paper
the qso names are given in j2000 coordinates , except in table 1 where the original name , based on j1950 coordinates is also given if applicable @xcite .
|
quasar absorption line systems strong lyman-@xmath0 lines divided into classes damped lyman-@xmath0 log@xmath3@xmath8 20.3 sub - damped lyman-@xmath3@xmath10 20.3 contain fraction neutral gas majority baryons in ionized lyman-@xmath0 forest clouds log n@xmath3@xmath9 15 intergalactic space @xcite lower threshold log n@xmath3=20.3 stems from 21 cm emission studies limited column density log n@xmath3@xmath720.3 near holmberg radius galaxy @xcite damping wings measure n@xmath3 begin sub - dla regime log n@xmath3@xmath1219.0 high gas content dla sub - dla systems associated with galaxies at redshifts elements detected in qso absorber systems c n o mg si s ca ti cr mn fe ni zn zn tracer gas - phase metallicity undepleted in galactic ism fraction h low tracks fe abundance in galactic stars lines zn ii @xmath132026,2062 weak typically unsaturatedlines covered with ground spectroscopy over redshifts , 0.65 @xmath9 z 3.5 covers large portion of history universe abundances of refractory elements cr fe relative to zn dust depletion abundance ratios [ si / fe ] o / fe ] [ mn / fe ] on enrichment from different types supernovae @xmath0-capture elements si and o in type ii explosions iron peak elements produced by type ia supernovae dla systems preferred for chemical abundance investigation high gas content most dlas metal poor below solar level below models mean metallicity at redshifts sub - dla systems ignored contribution to metal budget unknown evidence for contribution - dlas to metal budget from @xcite sub - dla systems have faster evolution of fe abundance higher abundances than dla systems validated by @xcite galactic chemical evolution slow long timescales examined for gradual chemical enrichmentredshifts @xmath15 span 70@xmath16 age universe concordance cosmology @xmath17@xmath18=70 km s@xmath19mpc@xmath19 few observations @xmath15 sub - dlas lack spectrographs paucity known sub - dlas redshift range large fraction age universe redshift regime important understanding sub - dla systems galactic chemical evolution increased sample sub - dlas with vlt uves magellan - ii mike spectra report ten new systems observed mike spectrograph magellan - ii clay telescope structure @xmath20 sec obs details observations data reduction techniques @xmath20 objects details individual objects observations mnfe investigates ratio mn / fe ] qso absorbers abund discuss abundances absorbers discussion appendix end plots uv spectra fits lyman-@xmath0 lines tables fit parameters systems observations with 6.5 m magellan - ii clay telescope magellan inamori kyocera echelle mike ) spectrograph @xcite 2007 sep double sided spectrograph blue red camera simultaneous wavelength coverage @xmath73340 to @xmath79400targets observed multiple exposures 1800 to 2700 sec minimize cosmic ray defects seeing @xmath10 1@xmath21 @xmath7 0.7@xmath21 target qsos observed 1@xmath21x5@xmath21 slit spectra binned 2x3 during readout resolving power mike spectrograph @xmath719,000 @xmath725,000 red blue sides 1@xmath21 slit table 1 summary observations spectra reduced mike pipeline reduction code burles prochaska r bernstein wavelengths calibrated th - ar comparison lamp exposure data bias subtracted overscan flat - fielded sky - subtracted spectral orders extracted spectra corrected heliocentric velocities converted vacuum wavelengths combined iraf parameters reduce cosmic rays spectra normalized polynomial five or less spline function fit continuum new observations 10 absorbers nine sub - dlas one z@xmath22@xmath9 1.5 selection criteria qso names j2000 coordinates except table 1 original name j1950 coordinates applicable
| 0.265625
| 1,617
| 856
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,863
|
the hypothesis that there exists a nonet of scalars mainly composed of a valence quark - antiquark pair and mixed according to near singlet - octet separation : @xmath0 singlet , @xmath1 octet , is put to further tests from the three body decays @xmath2 with @xmath3 .
the analysis of decay phases supports the singlet nature of @xmath0 .
|
following the hypothesis given in the abstract we select the following 4 p - wave nonets : @xmath5 .
they are displayed together with the pseudoscalar nonet in figure [ fig1 ] . as a consequence of the adopted selection criteria we exclude the following candidate states from the pdg listings @xcite : @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 and resonances with a mass exceeding @xmath9 in particular @xmath10 and @xmath11 ,
see also @xcite .
we pose the following questions : - is the flavor mixing pattern of the @xmath12 and @xmath13 nonets similar , i.e. near singlet - octet ?
the two nonets would be parity doublets due to chiral symmetry , which is spontaneously and explicitely broken . - does the scalar gluonic meson distort through large mixing effects the scalar @xmath4 nonet beyond ( spectroscopic ) recognition ? in our analysis in @xcite we started from the hypothesis , that the answer to this question is no . inspecting the spectra of the p - wave nonets in fig .
1 we observe no strong distortion in the scalar sector indeed . - can the last question be resolved through direct observation of the scalar gluonic meson as a conventionally narrow resonance and how reliable are the mass estimates from purely gluonic lattice - qcd @xcite @xmath14 - can qcd sum rules including local gluonic operators @xcite shed light on the above mass estimate ?
the latter two questions are adressed in the accompanying paper @xcite . * the gell - mann - okubo square mass formula * according to our analysis @xmath15 ( 980 ) represents the su3 singlet ,
whereas @xmath16 ( 984.7 ) , @xmath17 ( 1412 ) , @xmath18 ( 1507 ) form the associated octet .
the gell - mann - okubo ( first order ) mass square relation then yields ( in @xmath19 units ) @xmath20 the deviation amounts to @xmath21 is numerically a refinement with respect to ref .
] there is no sign - yet - of any major distortion .
the degeneracy in mass of @xmath22 and @xmath16 , while not offending any basic principles , indicates further dynamic simplicity to be explained .
the aim is to study and eventually confirm the nonstrange versus strange @xmath4 flavor structure of the two singlet - octet assigned isoscalar scalars : @xmath23 the following phase convention shall be chosen in the flavor basis @xmath24 and in the ns - s basis we have @xmath25 so in the flavor basis we have @xmath26 as conjectured range of the singlet - octet angle @xmath27 we consider @xmath28 the corresponding range for @xmath29 becomes @xmath30 previously @xcite we have analysed the decays involving @xmath0 : @xmath31 , the radiative decays @xmath32 and @xmath33 and concluded on a large flavor mixing similar to @xmath34-@xmath35 in the pseudoscalar nonet .
now we extend our analysis to d decays .
our analysis of the mixing pattern shall focus on the two ratios of strange to nonstrange components @xmath36 if the premise of mainly singlet @xmath37 ( 980 ) is correct we infer the ranges @xmath38 and @xmath39 .
the relation @xmath40 follows from orthogonality .
the restricted ranges are @xmath41 we determine @xmath29 considering the three three body decays of the charmed mesons @xmath42 and @xmath43 @xcite : @xmath44 we consider the color favored amplitudes ( @xmath45 a ) which contribute to all processes in eq .
[ eq:10 ] , and color suppressed amplitudes ( @xmath45 @xmath46 ) obtained by @xmath47 ( see fig .
[ fig4 ] ) and obtain @xmath48 we consider the two ratios of partial decay widths @xmath49 and @xmath50 : @xmath51 in the approximation @xmath52 , @xmath53 with cabibbo angle @xmath54 , we find @xmath55 where @xmath56 denote the phase space in s - wave decays , proportional to the @xmath57 momentum in the decay resonance rest frame .
using the branching fractions established by the e791 collaboration and the pdg results we find numerically @xmath58 then we obtain as solutions two bands ( a and b ) due to the quadratic nature of the relations in eq .
[ eq:14 ] @xmath59 the angle @xmath29 is defined modulo @xmath60 .
the two solutions in eq .
[ eq:15 ] can be distinguished through the sign of the quantity @xmath61 ( or @xmath62 ) defined in eq .
[ eq:8 ] .
the phase ( + ) structure of @xmath63 , @xmath64 is determined from interference with other resonances in @xmath65 and @xmath66 decays into @xmath67 and @xmath68 @xcite .
the amplitudes a , b , c in eq .
[ eq:11 ] exhibit the + phase structure shown in table 1 .
@xmath69 [ tab : phases ]
it becomes clear from the results in table 1 and the assumed form of the amplitudes in eq .
[ eq:11 ] , that only the solution in band a ) in eq .
[ eq:15 ] is compatible with the data .
this implies @xmath70 confirming the near singlet quark flavor mixing of @xmath0 , the ideal singlet corresponds to @xmath71 .
the present analysis leaves the mixing with the scalar gluonic meson(s ) completely open .
here we refer to our present results on glueballs in ref .
future work will hopefully establish the full structure of the scalar nonet lowest in mass including the scalar glueball @xmath72 ) .
it is a pleasure to thank all organizers and participants of the qcd2002 conference , in particular stephan narison , for enabling the meeting to evolve in a lively and fruitful atmosphere .
aitala et al . , e791 collaboration , phys .
86 , ( 2001 ) 770 , hep - ex 0007028 , and phys .
86 , ( 2001 ) 765 , hep - ex 0007027 .
frabetti et al . , e687 collaboration , phys .
b407 ( 1997 ) 79 , and phys .
b351 ( 1995 ) 591 .
|
hypothesis select 4 p - wave nonets @xmath5 displayed pseudoscalar nonet figure exclude candidate states pdg listings @xmath6 @xmath8 resonances mass exceeding @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 pose questions flavor mixing pattern @xmath12 @xmath13 nonets similar near singlet - octet ? nonets parity doublets chiral symmetry broken scalar gluonic meson distort large mixing scalar @xmath4 nonet beyond spectroscopic recognition ? no spectra - nonets no strong distortion scalar sector last question resolved observation scalar gluonic meson narrow resonance reliable mass estimates from purely gluonic lattice - qcd @xcite @xmath14 qcd sum rules local gluonic operators shed light mass estimate ? questions adressed accompanying paper gell - mann - okubo square mass formula @xmath15 ( 980 ) represents su3 singlet @xmath16 ( 984.7 @xmath17 ( 1412 ) @xmath18 ( 1507 ) associated octetgell - mann - okubo mass square relation yields @xmath19 units @xmath20 deviation to @xmath21 refinement no major distortion degeneracy in mass of @xmath22 @xmath16 indicates dynamic simplicity aim study confirm nonstrange versus strange @xmath4 flavor structure of two singlet - octet isoscalar scalars @xmath23 phase convention chosen flavor basis @xmath24 basis @xmath25 @xmath26 conjectured range singlet - octet angle @xmath27 @xmath28 range @xmath29 becomes @xmath30 analysed decays @xmath0 @xmath31 radiative decays @xmath32 @xmath33 large flavor mixing @xmath34-@xmath35 pseudoscalar extend analysis to d decays ratios strange to nonstrange components @xmath36 premise singlet @xmath37 infer ranges @xmath38 @xmath39 relation @xmath40 follows orthogonality restricted ranges @xmath41 determine @xmath29 three body decays of @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 color favored amplitudes @xmath45 color suppressed amplitudes @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47fig4 obtain @xmath48 consider partial decay widths @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 cabibbo angle @xmath54 find @xmath55 @xmath56 phase space s - wave decays proportional @xmath57 momentum decay resonance rest frame branching fractions e791 collaboration pdg results find @xmath58 obtain solutions two bands a b ) quadratic nature relations @xmath59 angle @xmath29 defined modulo @xmath60 two solutions distinguished sign quantity @xmath61 @xmath62 ) defined phase + structure @xmath63 @xmath64 determined interference resonances @xmath65 @xmath66 decays @xmath67 @xmath68 amplitudes a b c exhibit + phase structure table 1 @xmath69 phases results table 1 solution band a eq:15 compatible data implies @xmath70 near singlet quark flavor mixing @xmath0 ideal singlet @xmath71 present analysis leaves mixing scalar gluonic meson(s open refer present results glueballs future work establish full structure scalar nonet lowest mass scalar glueball @xmath72pleasure thank organizers participants qcd2002 conference stephan narison meeting lively atmosphere aitala e791 collaboration phys . 86 2001 770 hep - ex 0007028 2001 765 hep ex 0007027 frabetti e687 collaboration phys . b407 1997 ) 79 b351 1995 ) 591
| 0.259224
| 1,480
| 784
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.