sample_number
int64 8
203k
| abstract
stringlengths 21
17.4k
| article
stringlengths 0
18.9k
| compressed_article
stringlengths 0
10.9k
| compression_time
float64 0
0.78
| original_tokens
int64 0
3.79k
| compressed_tokens
int64 0
2.29k
| token_saving
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
201,869
|
we propose an effective algorithm that enumerates ( and actually finds ) all 3-edge colorings and hamiltonian cycles in a cubic graph .
the idea is to make a preliminary run that separates the vertices into two types : `` rigid '' ( such that the edges incident to them admit a unique coloring ) and `` soft '' ones ( such that the edges incident to them admit two distinct colorings ) , and then to perform the coloring .
the computational complexity of this algorithm is on a par with ( or even below ) the fastest known algorithms that find a single 3-edge coloring or a hamiltonian cycle for a cubic graph .
|
let us recall here some basic facts about the relationship between 3-edge colorings ( also called tait colorings ) and hamiltonian cycles in cubic graphs ; the details can be found in @xcite . by a _
cubic graph _ we understand a connected 3-regular multi - graph that is allowed to have double edges , but no loops ( obviously , a graph with loops can not have either edge colorings or hamiltonian cycles ) . consider a set of three distinct elements called `` colors '' ( say , @xmath0 , where @xmath1 stands for `` red '' , @xmath2 for `` green '' , and @xmath3 for `` blue '' ) .
3-edge coloring _ , or _ tait coloring _ is an assignment of a color to every edge such that the edges incident with each vertex have distinct colors .
every 3-edge coloring of a cubic graph @xmath4 gives rise to three distinct 2-factors ( that is , 2-regular spanning subgraphs ) of @xmath4 called _ tait cycles _ : each tait cycle is the union of edges painted in two colors out of the three ( the complement to a tait cycle is a perfect matching the union of disjoint edges painted in the third color ) .
if a cubic graph @xmath4 has a hamiltonian cycle , then @xmath4 also admits a 3-edge coloring that is unique up to a permutation of colors : just paint the hamiltonian cycle ( which always has even length ) in two intermittent colors , and paint the complement perfect matching in the remaining third color .
the above connection between 3-edge colorings and hamiltonian cycles suggests the following method of enumerating ( and actually finding ) all the hamiltonian cycles in a cubic graph : 1 .
find all 3-edge colorings ( tait colorings ) of a given cubic graph up to permutations of colors ; 2 .
find all the corresponding 2-factors ( tait cycles ) ; 3 .
check for connected 2-factors ( hamiltonian cycles ) .
this procedure gives the complete list of hamiltonian cycles in a cubic graph .
for the enumeration of 3-edge colorings we use an exhaustive backtracking algorithm that works in two runs . during the first run it dynamically separates all the vertices into two types : `` rigid '' ones
( that admit a unique coloring of edges incident with them ) , and `` soft '' ones ( with exactly two possibilities of coloring the incident edges ) ; no backtracking is needed on this stage .
the second run is the actual painting of edges : after it successfully colored the graph or was unable to complete the coloring , it returns to the last visited soft vertex and tries a different possibility .
the details are explained in the next section .
first we partition the set of vertices @xmath5 , of the graph @xmath4 into two disjoint subsets @xmath6 of rigid ( @xmath7 ) and soft ( @xmath8 ) vertices .
we note that this partition is not canonical .
initially we put @xmath9 and dynamically change their content .
we also introduce a temporary set @xmath10 of _ unidentified _ vertices that we already visited , and an ordered list of colored edges @xmath11 .
we label the vertices of @xmath4 by integers @xmath12 . for the vertex with number @xmath13
we denote the numbers of adjacent vertices by @xmath14 . an edge connecting @xmath13 and @xmath15 we denote by @xmath16 $ ] .
we start at the vertex @xmath17 and add it to the set @xmath7 of rigid vertices .
we add the three edges @xmath18,\,[0,n^0_1],\,[0,n^0_2]$ ] incident with it to the list @xmath11 , and we add their endpoints @xmath19 to @xmath10 .
now we check if any of the vertices in @xmath10 are the endpoints of at least two edges in @xmath11 . if this is the case , we move all such vertices from @xmath10 to @xmath7 , and for every such vertex we also add the remaining third edge incident to it to the set @xmath11 ( if it is not already there ) .
we continue the above procedure until there is no vertex left in @xmath10 that is an endpoint of at least two edges in @xmath11 .
now pick the vertex from @xmath10 with the smallest number , say @xmath13 , and move it into @xmath8 .
note that @xmath13 is an endpoint of a single edge in the current set @xmath11 .
next , we append to @xmath11 the two remaining edges incident with @xmath13 , add their endpoints to @xmath10 , and again check if any of the vertices in @xmath10 bound at least two edges in @xmath11 . if they do , such vertices are moved to @xmath7 , and the missing edges incident with these vertices are added to @xmath11 .
otherwise , we pick a vertex from @xmath10 with the smallest number , move it to @xmath8 and repeat the procedure until @xmath10 becomes empty , or , equivalently , until @xmath11 coincides with @xmath20 . since @xmath4 is connected , this would mean that @xmath21 . setting @xmath22 and @xmath23
we obtain the required partition . the final list of edges @xmath11 provides the order in which we attempt to paint the edges of the graph .
as above , we start at the vertex 0 and paint the edges @xmath18,\,[0,n^0_1],\,[0,n^0_2]$ ] incident with it in colors @xmath24 respectively . if the next edge in @xmath11 has a rigid vertex as its endpoint , then there is a unique color left for the remaining third edge incident with that vertex .
if the next pair of edges is incident with a soft vertex , we choose one of the two options for painting these edges ( in case we visit this vertex for the first time ) . continuing this way we may successfully reach the end of the list @xmath11 and get a complete edge coloring that we save for our record .
it may as well happen that the procedure ends prematurely when two edges incident to the same vertex are painted in the same color . in both cases we return in @xmath11 to the previous soft vertex that was visited only once , and start over painting edges in a different way . at the end
we get the list of all possible tait colorings and check which of them produce connected tait cycles ( that is , hamiltonian cycles ) . let us now illustrate this algorithm on a simple example .
consider the graph @xmath4 on 8 vertices @xmath25 shown on fig .
1 . we start with @xmath26 .
the initial vertex @xmath17 is a rigid vertex , @xmath27 .
add the edges @xmath28,[0,3],[0,7]$ ] to @xmath11 and the vertices @xmath29 to @xmath10 .
none of these vertices is an endpoint of two edges in @xmath11 , so we remove the vertex 1 from @xmath10 , append it to @xmath8 , and add the edges @xmath30 $ ] and @xmath31 $ ] to @xmath11 . again , none of the vertices in @xmath10 is an endpoint of two edges in @xmath11 , so we move the vertex 2 to @xmath8 and add the edges @xmath32 $ ] and @xmath33 $ ] to @xmath11 . now
the vertex 3 bounds two edges in @xmath11 , namely , @xmath34 $ ] and @xmath32 $ ] . we move it to @xmath7 ,
add the edge @xmath35 $ ] to @xmath11 and the vertex 4 to @xmath7 .
none of the vertices @xmath36 in @xmath10 bounds at least two edges , so we move the vertex 4 to @xmath8 and add the edges @xmath37 $ ] and @xmath38 $ ] to @xmath11 .
we see that the vertices 5 and 7 become rigid , and so does the vertex 6 .
thus , we get @xmath39 , and the ordered set of edges is @xmath40,[0,3],[0,7],[1,2],[1,6],[2,3],[2,5],[3,4],[4,5],[4,7],[5,6],[6,7]\}$ ] . let us start coloring the graph .
we paint the edges @xmath28,[0,3],[0,7]$ ] in colors @xmath41 respectively .
there are two possible ways of coloring the edges incident with the first soft vertex 1 .
we first paint @xmath30 $ ] in color @xmath2 and @xmath31 $ ] in color @xmath3 . at the next soft vertex 2
we again have two options , and choose the first one of them paint @xmath32 $ ] in color @xmath1 , and @xmath33 $ ] in color @xmath3 .
the edge @xmath35 $ ] incident with the rigid vertex 3 necessarily have color @xmath3 . at the last soft vertex 4 both possibilities of coloring the edges @xmath37,[4,7]$ ] lead to complete edge colorings of @xmath4 .
now we return to the previous soft point 2 and paint@xmath32 $ ] in @xmath3 , and @xmath33 $ ] in @xmath1 .
this gives us one more tait coloring ( one of the options can not be completed ) .
finally , returning to the first soft point 1 and painting the edges @xmath30,[1,6]$ ] in colors @xmath42 respectively , we get the last coloring .
thus , there exist 4 distinct tait colorings of the graph @xmath4 ( up to permutations of colors ) listed in the following table : [ cols= " < , < , < , < , < " , ] the first one of these 4 edge colorings has no hamiltonian cycles associated with it , whereas the other three ones produce two hamiltonian cycles each . they are listed below ( we indicate in brackets the corresponding alternating colors ) : @xmath43
it is clear that the computational complexity of this algorithm is of order @xmath44 since the set of soft vertices @xmath45 depends on the ordering of vertices of @xmath4 , the complexity also depends on this ordering . to give an upper bound for @xmath46 for a simple graph without double edges we note that , every time we add two new edges to @xmath11 incident with a soft vertex , we encounter one of the three possibilities : 1 .
both new endpoints belong to @xmath10 ; 2 .
one new endpoint belongs to @xmath10 an one to @xmath7 ( the vertex from @xmath7 then gives rise to new vertices that are added to @xmath47 ) ; 3 .
both new endpoints belong to @xmath7 . in any case , every soft vertex gives rise to at least two new vertices in @xmath48 and the lower bound 2 is attained when the both endpoints of the edges incident with a soft vertex belong to @xmath49 thus , when the union @xmath50 becomes equal to @xmath5 for the first time , we have the inequality @xmath51 in particular , it implies that @xmath52 at this stage .
let @xmath2 be the girth of @xmath4 ( that is , the length of the shortest cycle in @xmath4 ) .
when we reach the stage @xmath53 , every new soft vertex gives rise to at least @xmath54 rigid vertices .
this means that no more than @xmath55 vertices will be added to @xmath8 .
therefore , in the case @xmath56 , i.e. , when @xmath4 is triangle free , the number of soft vertices @xmath57 as @xmath58 .
thus , the speed of our algoritm is on a par with the fastest algoritms that find a single edge coloring or a single hamiltonian cycle in a cubic graph , or even better ( cf .
, e.g. , @xcite ) .
the absence of short cycles makes the algorithm even faster with complexity bounded from above by @xmath59 .
( note that the presence of double edges does not slow down the algorithm because at least one of their two common endpoints is rigid . )
it is instructive to compare the above complexity estimate with the results of @xcite .
let @xmath60 $ ] denote the eigenvalues of the ( normalized ) adjacency matrix of a simple cubic graph @xmath4 .
consider the mean@xmath61 and the variance @xmath62 of the exponents @xmath63 .
for each fixed @xmath64 the points @xmath65 form clusters called _ filars _ that enjoy a fractal - like structure . from the results of @xcite combined with the above considerations it follows that the closer is the point @xmath65 to the origin , the faster works our algorithm for the corresponding graph .
this algorithm was implemented in c++ code and compiled on a windows x86 machine ( pentium iv 3.40 ghz processor with 1 gb of ram ) using ccg gnu compiler ( the program code is given in appendix ) .
a good benchmark for testing programs that search for a hamiltonian cycle is provided by the horton graph @xcite , displayed on fig .
2 . it is a cubic bipartite graph on 96 vertices without hamiltonian cycles , but with many `` long '' cycles ( that is , cycles of length close to 96 ) .
some programs choke when they reach such a long cycle , not being able to transform it into a hamiltonian one .
our program completed the search in @xmath66 steps ( so that the actual complexity is of order @xmath67 ) .
the process took 6336 sec .
of machine time , found 143982592 tait colorings and no hamiltonian cycles .
our program is an open source program and its ansi c++ code is available at the following address : @xmath68 ( we do not present it here because of its length ) .
the code does not use any platform specific header files , and with minor modifications it can be compiled with essentially any c++ compiler that is not mentally challenged .
* acknowledgement * we thank j. filar for his interest in this work .
the work of ve , sr was supported , in part , by the australian research council discovery grant dp0666632 .
the work of pz was partially supported by the president of russian federation grant nsh - u329.2006.1 and by the russian foundation for basic research grant 05 - 01 - 00899 .
tutte , w. t. _ graph theory_. cambridge univ . press , 1984 .
eppstein , d. improved algorithms for 3-coloring , 3-edge - coloring , and constraint satisfaction , 12th acm - siam symp .
discrete algorithms , washington , 2001 , 329337 .
bondy , j. a. and murty , u. s. r. , _ graph theory with applications_. ny , north holland , 1976 .
ejov , v. v. , filar , j. a. , lukas , s. k. and zograf , p.g .
clustering of spectra and fractals of regular graphs .
preprint math.co/0610742 ( to appear in jmaa ) .
|
recall basic facts relationship between 3-edge colorings tait colorings and hamiltonian cycles in cubic graphs details found in @xcite cubic graph connected 3-regular multi - graph double edges no loops graph with loops have edge colorings or hamiltonian cycles consider three distinct elements `` colors '' @xmath0 @xmath1 for red @xmath2 green @xmath3 blue 3-edge coloring assignment color to every edge distinct colors every 3-edge coloring cubic graph @xmath4 gives three distinct 2-factors called tait cycles _ each tait cycle union of edges painted in two colors three complement to tait cycle matching union disjoint edges third color if cubic graph @xmath4 has hamiltonian cycle admits 3-edge coloring unique up to permutation of colors paint hamiltonian cycle in two intermittent colors paint complement matching in remaining third color connection between 3-edge colorings hamiltonian cycles suggests method enumerating hamiltonian cycles in cubic graph find all 3-edge colorings find corresponding 2-factors tait cycles check for connected 2-factors hamiltonian cyclesprocedure gives hamiltonian cycles in cubic graph for 3-edge colorings backtracking algorithm in two runs first run separates vertices into two types rigid unique coloring and soft two possibilities coloring no backtracking needed second run is painting of edges after returns to last soft vertex tries different possibility details next section partition vertices @xmath5 into subsets @xmath6 of rigid and soft @xmath8 ) vertices partition not canonical put @xmath9 change content introduce temporary set @xmath10 of unidentified vertices ordered list of colored edges @xmath11 label vertices of @xmath4 by integers @xmath12 vertex with number @xmath13 denote numbers adjacent vertices by @xmath14 edge connecting @xmath13 and @xmath15 by @xmath16 start at vertex @xmath17 add to set @xmath7 of rigid vertices add three edges @xmath18, to list @xmath11 add endpoints @xmath19 to @xmath10 check if vertices in @xmath10 are endpoints of two edges in @xmath11move vertices from @xmath10 to @xmath7 add remaining third edge to @xmath11 continue procedure until no vertex left in @xmath10 endpoint of two edges in @xmath11 pick vertex smallest number @xmath13 move into @xmath8 @xmath13 endpoint of single edge in current set @xmath11 append to @xmath11 two remaining edges with @xmath13 add endpoints to @xmath10 check if vertices two edges in @xmath11 if vertices moved to @xmath7 missing edges added to @xmath11 otherwise pick vertex from smallest number move to @xmath8 repeat procedure until @xmath10 empty or @xmath11 coincides with @xmath20 @xmath4 connected @xmath21 setting @xmath22 and @xmath23 obtain required partition final list of edges @xmath11 provides order paint edges start at vertex 0 paint edges @xmath18, in colors @xmath24 if next edge in @xmath11 has rigid vertex endpoint unique color left for remaining third edgenext edges soft vertex choose two options painting reach end list @xmath11 complete edge coloring for record procedure ends prematurely when two edges same painted same color return to previous soft vertex start over painting edges end get list of tait colorings check produce connected tait cycles hamiltonian cycles illustrate algorithm example graph @xmath4 on 8 vertices @xmath25 fig . 1 start with @xmath26 initial vertex @xmath17 rigid vertex @xmath27 add edges @xmath28,[0,3][0,7]$ to @xmath11 @xmath29 to @xmath10 none endpoint of two edges in @xmath11 remove vertex 1 from @xmath10 append to @xmath8 add edges @xmath30 @xmath31 $ ] to @xmath11 endpoint of two edges @xmath11 move vertex 2 to @xmath8 add edges @xmath32 @xmath33 $ ] to @xmath11 vertex 3 bounds two edges @xmath11 @xmath34 move to @xmath7 add edge @xmath35 $ ] to @xmath11 vertex 4 to @xmath7 vertices @xmath36 @xmath10 edges move vertex 4 to @xmath8 add edges @xmath37 @xmath38 to @xmath11 vertices 5 7 rigid vertex 6 get @xmath39 ordered edges @xmath40,[0,3],[0,7],[1,2][1,6][2,3][2,5][3,4][4,5][4,7][5,6][6,7] start coloring paint edges @xmath28,[0,3],[0,7] colors @xmath41 two ways coloring edges first soft vertex 1 paint @xmath30 @xmath2 @xmath31 @xmath3 next vertex 2 two options paint @xmath32 @xmath1 @xmath33 @xmath3 edge @xmath35 $ with rigid vertex 3 color @xmath3 last soft vertex 4 coloring edges @xmath37,[4,7]$ lead to complete edge colorings @xmath4 return to soft point 2 paint@xmath32 @xmath3 @xmath33 in @xmath1 more coloring first soft point 1 edges @xmath30,[1,6]$ in colors @xmath42 last coloring4 tait colorings of graph @xmath4 permutations listed in table : first 4 colorings no hamiltonian cycles other three produce two cycles each listed below colors : @xmath43 computational complexity algorithm is order @xmath44 soft vertices @xmath45 depends on ordering vertices @xmath4 complexity depends upper bound for @xmath46 simple graph without double edges two new edges to @xmath11 soft vertex three possibilities : both new endpoints belong to @xmath10 ; one endpoint belongs to @xmath10 one to @xmath7 vertex rise to new vertices to @xmath47 3 both endpoints belong to @xmath7 every soft vertex gives rise to two new vertices in @xmath48 lower bound 2 attained when both endpoints edges belong to @xmath49 union @xmath50 equal to @xmath5 inequality @xmath51 implies @xmath52 @xmath2 be girth of @xmath4 shortest cycle stage @xmath53 every new soft vertex gives rise to least @xmath54 rigid vertices no more than @xmath55 vertices added to @xmath8 case @xmath56 @xmath4 triangle free soft vertices @xmath57 @xmath58 speed our algoritm par with fastest algoritms single edge coloring hamiltonian cycle in cubic graph @xcite absence of short cycles makes algorithm faster with complexity bounded by @xmath59 double edges slow algorithm one two common endpoints rigid compare complexity estimate with results @xcite @xmath60 denote eigenvalues adjacency matrix of cubic graph @xmath4 consider mean@xmath61 variance @xmath62 of exponents @xmath63 fixed @xmath64 points @xmath65 form clusters filars fractal - like structure closer point @xmath65 to origin faster works algorithm graph algorithm implemented in c++ code compiled on windows x86 machine pentium iv 3.40 ghz processor 1 gb ram using ccg gnu compiler program code in appendix ) benchmark for testing programs hamiltonian cycle horton graph @xcite fig . 2 cubic bipartite graph on 96 vertices without hamiltonian cycles many long cycles some programs choke long cycle transform into hamiltonianprogram completed search @xmath66 steps complexity @xmath67 process took 6336 sec machine time found 143982592 tait colorings no hamiltonian cycles open source ansi c++ code available @xmath68 length code platform specific header files minor modifications compiled any c++ compiler not mentally challenged thank j. filar interest work ve sr supported australian research council discovery grant dp0666632 work pz partially supported president russian federation grant nsh - u329.2006.1 russian foundation basic research grant 05 - 01 - 00899 tutte w graph theory cambridge univ press 1984 eppstein improved algorithms 3-coloring 3-edge - coloring constraint satisfaction 12th - algorithms washington 2001 329337 bondy j murty theory applications north holland 1976 ejov filar j lukas s zograf clustering spectra fractals regular graphs preprint math.co/0610742 jmaa
| 0.504454
| 3,412
| 1,820
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,871
|
using 5.46 pb@xmath0 of @xmath1 annihilation data collected at the @xmath2 with the cleo detector we have observed a variety of new hadronic decay modes of the @xmath2 .
a comprehensive set of branching ratios and upper limits is presented .
|
in perturbative qcd the states @xmath3 and @xmath2 are non - relativistic bound states of a charm and an anti - charm quark .
the decays of these states are expected to be dominated by the annihilation of the constituent @xmath4 into three gluons .
the partial width for the decays into an exclusive hadronic state , @xmath5 , is expected to be proportional to the square of the @xmath4 wave function overlap at the origin , which is well determined from the leptonic width @xcite .
since the strong coupling constant , @xmath6 , is not very different at the @xmath3 and @xmath2 masses , it is expected that for any state @xmath5 the @xmath3 and @xmath2 branching ratios are related by @xmath7 where @xmath8 denotes a branching fraction , @xmath5 is a particular hadronic final state , and the leptonic branching fractions are taken from the pdg @xcite .
this relation is sometimes called the 12% rule .
modest deviations from the rule are expected @xcite .
although the rule works well for some specific decay modes of the @xmath2 , it fails spectacularly for @xmath2 decays to final states consisting of one vector and one pseudoscalar meson ( vp ) , such as @xmath9 .
values of @xmath10 have been measured for a wide variety of final states @xcite .
a recent review @xcite of relevant theory and experiment concludes that current theoretical explanations are unsatisfactory .
clearly more experimental results are desirable .
this paper presents measurements of the following new decay modes of the @xmath2 : @xmath11 , @xmath9 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 , and more precise measurements of these previously measured modes : @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 , @xmath35 , and @xmath36 .
we also obtain an improved upper limit for @xmath37 .
where applicable , the inclusion of charge conjugate modes is implied .
we select intermediate final states in the following decay modes : @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40 , @xmath41 , @xmath42 and @xmath11 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 and @xmath45 , @xmath46 and @xmath47 .
the data sample used in this analysis is obtained at the @xmath2 and the nearby continuum in @xmath1 collisions produced by the cornell electron storage ring ( cesr ) and acquired with the cleo detector .
the datasets consist of @xmath48=5.46 pb@xmath0 on the peak of the @xmath2 ( 2.57 pb@xmath0 for cleo iii @xcite , 2.89 pb@xmath0 for cleo - c @xcite ) and 20.5 pb@xmath0 at @xmath49=3.67 gev ( all cleo - c ) .
the nominal scale factor used to normalize continuum yields to @xmath2 data is @xmath50 , and is determined from the integrated luminosities of the data sets corrected for the @xmath51 dependence of the cross section , where the error is from the relative luminosity uncertainty .
the actual @xmath52 used for each mode also corrects for the small differences in efficiency between the @xmath2 and continuum data samples .
standard requirements are used to select charged particles reconstructed in the tracking system and photon candidates in the csi calorimeter .
charged particles are identified using a likelihood function that incorporates de / dx from the drift chamber and information from the rich .
the invariant mass of the decay products from intermediate resonant states such as @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 , @xmath58 , @xmath59 and @xmath60 must lie within limits determined from monte carlo ( mc ) studies .
energy and momentum conservation requirements are imposed on the reconstructed final state hadrons , which have momentum @xmath61 and combined measured energy @xmath62 .
we require the measured scaled energy @xmath62/@xmath63 be consistent with unity within experimental resolution , which varies by final state .
we require @xmath64 .
together these requirements suppress backgrounds with missing energy or incorrect mass assignments .
the experimental resolutions are smaller than 1% in scaled energy and 2% in scaled momentum . for the modes with two or more charged pions , two @xmath65 or an @xmath54 , we reject @xmath66 ( @xmath67 , @xmath68 , or @xmath54 ) events in which the mass of any of the following falls within the range @xmath69 gev : the two highest momentum oppositely charged tracks , the recoil mass against the two lowest momentum oppositely charged tracks , or the mass recoiling against the 2@xmath65 or @xmath54 . for every final state , a signal selection range in @xmath62/@xmath63 is determined by mc simulation , and a sideband selection range is defined to measure background .
final states with intermediate particles must satisfy a scaled energy signal selection range requirement identical to the corresponding mode without the intermediate particle ; and the event yield is determined from signal and sideband selection ranges of the intermediate particle mass .
the number of events attributable to each @xmath2 decay mode is obtained by subtracting the number of events in the sideband region and the scaled continuum production from the number of events in the signal region .
interference between @xmath2 decay and continuum production of the same final state is neglected .
the efficiency for each final state is the average obtained from mc simulations for both detector configurations ; the two values are typically within a few percent ( relative ) to each other .
no initial state radiation is included in the mc , but final state radiation is accounted for .
we correct the number of signal for the efficiency and normalize to the number of @xmath70 , @xmath71 decays in the data , which has been determined previously to be @xmath72 @xcite .
the resulting relative branching ratios are obtained and then converted to the absolute branching ratios using @xmath73 @xcite and @xmath74 @xcite .
@xmath10 values are determined using the absolute @xmath2 branching ratios determined in this analysis and @xmath3 branching ratios from @xcite .
the branching ratios and @xmath10 values for 2-body modes are given in table [ tab:2body ] , where bes numbers are from @xcite ; preliminary results for multi - body modes @xcite are listed in table [ tab : multi ] . [ tab:2body ] [ tab : multi ]
we have presented first evidence for @xmath2 decays to @xmath11 , @xmath9 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and @xmath75 .
measurements for several other vp channels are also given .
the results suggest that , for vp final states , @xmath2 decays through three gluons are severely suppressed with respect to the 12% rule and the corresponding electromagnetic processes are not . the decay @xmath76 exhibits a @xmath38 signal but has a much larger component at higher @xmath77 mass .
we also present preliminary branching fractions for seven new multi - body decay modes of the @xmath2 , namely @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 , and more precise measurements of nine previously measured modes , which are @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 , @xmath35 , and @xmath36 .
we also obtain an improved upper limit for @xmath37 . for multi - body decay modes
@xmath10 values are in general lower than , but , in most cases , consistent with the 12% rule .
we gratefully acknowledge the effort of the cesr staff in providing us with excellent luminosity and running conditions .
this work was supported by the national science foundation , the u.s .
department of energy , the research corporation , and the texas advanced research program .
cleo collaboration , y. kubota _ et al .
methods phys .
res . , sect .
a * 320 * , 66 ( 1992 ) ; d. peterson _ et al . _ ,
methods phys .
res . , sect .
a * 478 * , 142 ( 2002 ) ; m. artuso _ et al . _ ,
methods phys .
a * 502 * , 91 ( 2003 ) .
|
perturbative qcd states @xmath3 non - relativistic bound states charm anti - charm quark decays dominated by annihilation @xmath4 into three gluons partial width decays into hadronic state @xmath5 proportional to square @xmath4 wave function overlap at origin determined from leptonic width strong coupling constant @xmath6 not different at @xmath3 @xmath2 masses @xmath3 @xmath2 branching ratios related by @xmath7 @xmath8 branching fraction @xmath5 hadronic final state leptonic branching fractions taken from pdg @xcite 12% rule modest deviations expected rule decay modes fails for decays to final states one vector one pseudoscalar meson @xmath9 values @xmath10 measured for variety final states review concludes theoretical explanations unsatisfactory more experimental results desirablepaper presents measurements new decay modes @xmath2 : precise measurements previously measured modes @xmath22 improved upper limit for @xmath37 inclusion of charge conjugate modes implied select intermediate final states in decay modes : @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath42 @xmath11 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 . data sample obtained at @xmath2 nearby continuum @xmath1 collisions produced cornell electron storage ring ) acquired with cleo detector datasets consist @xmath48=5.46 pb@xmath0 on peak @xmath2 ( 2.57 pb@xmath0 for cleo iii @xcite 2.89 pb@xmath0 for cleo - c @xcite ) 20.5 pb@xmath0 at @xmath49=3.67 gev ( all cleo - c ) nominal scale factor continuum yields @xmath2 data is @xmath50 determined from integrated luminosities corrected for @xmath51 dependence error from relative luminosity uncertainty @xmath52 corrects small differences efficiency between @xmath2 continuum data samples standard requirements select charged particles tracking system photon candidates in csi calorimeter charged particles identified using likelihood function de / dx drift chamber information rich invariant mass of decay products from intermediate resonant states @xmath53 within limits monte carlo studies energy momentum conservation requirements on reconstructed final state hadrons momentum @xmath61 measured energy @xmath62 require energy @xmath62/@xmath63 consistent with experimental resolution @xmath64 requirements suppress backgrounds with missing energy incorrect mass assignments experimental resolutions smaller than 1% in scaled energy 2% in scaled momentum modes with two charged pions @xmath65 @xmath54 reject @xmath66 @xmath67 ) events mass within range @xmath69 highest tracks recoil mass against lowest against@xmath65 or @xmath54final state signal selection range @xmath62/@xmath63 determined by mc simulation sideband selection range defined background final states with intermediate particles satisfy energy signal selection range requirement identical mode without event yield determined from signal sideband selection ranges intermediate particle mass events @xmath2 decay mode subtracting sideband region continuum production from signal region interference between decay continuum production neglected efficiency state average from mc simulations detector configurations within few percent no initial state radiation included final state radiation accounted for correct signal efficiency normalize to @xmath70 @xmath71 decays determined @xmath72 @xcite relative branching ratios converted to absolute @xmath73 @xmath74 @xcite @xmath10 values determined using @xmath2 branching ratios @xmath3 branching ratios @xcite branching ratios @xmath10 values for 2-body modes in table [ tab:2body ] from @xcite preliminary results for multi - body modes @xcite in table [ tab : multi ] evidence for @xmath2 decays to @xmath11 measurements for other vp channels givenresults suggest vp final states @xmath2 decays through three gluons suppressed 12% rule electromagnetic processes not decay @xmath76 exhibits @xmath38 signal larger component at higher @xmath77 mass present preliminary branching fractions for seven new multi - body decay modes of @xmath2 @xmath15 precise measurements of nine previously measured modes @xmath27 improved upper limit for @xmath37 multi - body decay modes @xmath10 values lower than , consistent with 12% rule acknowledge effort cesr staff providing excellent luminosity running conditions work supported by national science foundation u.s . department of energy research corporation texas advanced research program cleo collaboration kubota al . methods phys . res . a * 320 * 66 ( 1992 ) peterson 478 142 ( 2002 ) artuso methods phys * 502 * 91 ( 2003 )
| 0.310956
| 2,003
| 978
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,874
|
the single - top production cross section is one third that of the top - pair production cross section at the lhc . during a year of data - taking , assuming an average luminosity of @xmath0 and a cms energy of @xmath1 , the determination of the major contributions to the total single - top cross section should be achievable .
comparisons between the measured cross sections and the theoretical predictions will provide a crucial test of the standard model .
these measurements should also lead to the first direct measurement of @xmath2 , with a precision at the level of a few percent .
in addition , they will probe for new physics via the search for evidence of anomalous couplings to the top quark and the measurements of additional bosonic contributions to single - top production .
methods developed to optimize the selection of single - top events in the three production channels are presented and the potential for the cross section measurements with 1@xmath3 and 30@xmath3 of integrated luminosity is established .
|
single - top quarks are produced via the electroweak interaction and at leading order there are three different production mechanisms ; s - channel , t - channel , and @xmath4-channel , each of which are depicted in figure [ fig : singletop ] . the theoretical cross sections for the single - top processes are @xmath5
@xcite for the t - channel , @xmath6 @xcite for the s - channel , and @xmath7 @xcite for the @xmath4-channel .
note that each single - top process has a @xmath8 vertex .
only single - top events with an isolated and high-@xmath9 electron or muon in the final state are included in this study since events with only hadrons in the final state are difficult to distinguish from background .
ccc -channel single - top production.,width=113,height=113 ] -channel single - top production.,width=113,height=113 ] -channel single - top production.,width=113,height=113 ] the dominant background to single - top production is @xmath10 production , which has a cross section three times larger than the combined single - top production cross section . with a single high-@xmath9 lepton , two @xmath11-jets , and @xmath12 ,
semi - leptonic @xmath10 decay is most likely to mimic single - top events . due to the lack of leptons in the final state , fully - hadronic @xmath10 events are not a major contributor to single - top background .
@xmath13 + jets production constitutes a significant background since the cross - sections for these processes are several orders of magnitude greater than the single - top cross sections .
the background from di - boson events is minimal .
qcd will be estimated by data driven methods and is not considered in these studies .
the amount of qcd contamination depends on the specific selections used in the analyses .
the single - top processes were generated using pythia @xcite , with the matrix element calculated using acermc @xcite .
the @xmath10 sample , which included both di - lepton and semi - leptonic decays , was generated using herwig @xcite and the matrix element was calculated using mc@nlo @xcite .
the @xmath13 + jets sample was generated using pythia and the matrix element was calculated with alpgen @xcite .
mcfm @xcite was used to derive the k - factors needed to scale the lo processes calculated with alpgen to nlo .
the three single - top processes shared a common pre - selection . muons and electrons were required to satisfy reconstruction requirements of @xmath14 and @xmath15 and an isolation requirement of @xmath16 in a cone of radius 0.2 around the particle axis .
events were required to contain one muon or electron with @xmath17 and events with secondary leptons were removed to eliminate contamination from di - lepton @xmath10 events and to ensure the orthogonality of the muon and electron samples .
jet candidates were reconstructed using a cone algorithm with @xmath18 and were required to satisfy @xmath19 to be considered a jet . an event was required to have between 2 and 4 jets , with at least two of the jets having @xmath17 and at least one of the jets being @xmath11-tagged .
events were required to have @xmath20 , which corresponds to the energy of the non - detected neutrino present in leptonic @xmath13 decay .
the measurement of the single - top cross sections in the atlas detector @xcite will be obtained using the formula @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the total number of events in the data , @xmath23 is the number of expected background events , @xmath24 is the selection efficiency for single - top signal events , and @xmath25 is the luminosity .
cross section errors were estimated by randomly generating @xmath22 according to a poisson distribution and randomly varying @xmath23 and @xmath24 for every systematic quantity by an amount determined by a gaussian distribution around the central value of that quantity .
the sources of experimental uncertainty were jet energy scale ( jes ) , @xmath11-tagging likelihood , and luminosity .
the sources of theoretical uncertainties were background cross sections , initial state radiation ( isr ) and final state radiation ( fsr ) , pdfs , and @xmath11 quark fragmentation .
cut - based and multivariate analyses of the cross section measurements were performed for each of the three single - top channels in order to understand the size of the statistical and systematic errors and the amount of integrated luminosity needed to obtain evidence and achieve discovery of the single - top quark . a full description of the single - top analyses can be found in @xcite .
the cut - based analysis for the t - channel was performed by requiring , in addition to the event pre - selection , a @xmath11-tagged jet with @xmath26 in order to remove low-@xmath9
@xmath13 + jets background and @xmath27 for the hardest light jet to remove @xmath10 contamination . after this selection
, there were 1,460 signal and 3,906 background events for a 1@xmath3 sample .
the quantity of @xmath10 background remaining after the t - channel specific event selection necessitated the use of a boosted decision tree ( bdt ) .
variables providing a good signal to background separation were used as input to the bdt and a cut of 0.6 on the bdt output minimized the total uncertainty on the cross section and corresponded to a signal over background ratio of 1.3 .
the bdt output is shown on the left side of figure [ fig : t - channel : bdt ] and the leptonic top mass distribution using a cut of 0.6 on the bdt output is shown on the right side of figure [ fig : t - channel : bdt ] .
ccc table [ tbl : t - channel : errors ] lists the uncertainties for 1@xmath3 and 10@xmath3 of integrated luminosity . for both analysis methods and both integrated luminosity samples ,
the systematic uncertainties far outweigh the statistical uncertainties .
the main systematic uncertainties on the t - channel cross section measurement were jes , isr and fsr , and luminosity .
the systematics achieved using the bdt were approximately half of those obtained with the cut based analysis .
.uncertainties on the t - channel cross section measurement for 1@xmath3 and 10@xmath3 of integrated luminosity . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
for a 5@xmath28 single - top quark discovery in the t - channel , 1@xmath3 of integrated luminosity is needed while 30 @xmath3 is needed for 3@xmath28 evidence in the s - channel . 1 @xmath3
is needed for evidence and 10 @xmath3 is needed for discovery in the @xmath4-channel .
systematic uncertainties are the limiting factor in the single - top cross section measurement , except for the s - channel where statistics also play a limiting role .
the systematics in the current analysis have a strong dependence on monte carlo and the use of data - driven analysis techniques should help minimize them .
|
single - top quarks produced via electroweak interaction three production mechanisms s - t - channel @xmath4-channel depicted in figure theoretical cross sections for single - processes are @xmath5 t @xmath6 s @xmath7 each single - top process has @xmath8 vertex single - top events with isolated high-@xmath9 electron or muon in final state included hadrons difficult distinguish dominant background is @xmath10 production cross section three times larger than combined single - top production single high-@xmath9 lepton two @xmath11-jets @xmath12 semi - leptonic @xmath10 decay likely single - top events lack of leptons final state fully - hadronic @xmath10 events not major single - background @xmath13 + jets production significant background cross - sections greater background from di - boson events minimal qcd estimated by data methods not considered qcd contamination depends on specific selections single - top processes generated using pythia @xcite matrix element calculated using acermc @xcite @xmath10 sample included di - lepton semi - leptonic decays generated herwig @xcite matrix element calculated mc@nlo @xcite @xmath13 + jets sample generated pythia matrix calculated alpgen @xcite mcfm @xcite k - factors lo processes alpgen nlo three single - top processes common pre - selection muons electrons satisfy reconstruction requirements @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 cone radius 0.2 particle axis events one muon electron @xmath17 secondary leptons removed eliminate contamination di - lepton @xmath10 ensure orthogonality muon electron samples jet candidates reconstructed cone algorithm @xmath18 satisfy @xmath19 event 2 4 jets two @xmath17 one @xmath11-tagged events @xmath20 corresponds energy non - detected neutrino leptonic @xmath13 decay measurement single - top cross sections atlas detector @xcite formula @xmath21 @xmath22 total number events expected background events selection efficiency single - top signal events luminosity cross section errors estimated randomly generating @xmath22 varying @xmath23 @xmath24 quantity gaussian distributionsources experimental uncertainty were jet energy scale @xmath11-tagging likelihood luminosity theoretical uncertainties were background cross sections initial pdfs @xmath11 quark fragmentation cut - based multivariate analyses cross section measurements performed for three single - top channels understand statistical systematic errors integrated luminosity needed discovery single - top quark description analyses in @xcite cut - based analysis for t - channel @xmath11-tagged jet with @xmath26 remove low-@xmath9 @xmath13 + jets background @xmath27 for hardest light jet remove @xmath10 contamination after 1,460 signal 3,906 background events for 1@xmath3 sample @xmath10 background after selection necessitated boosted decision tree bdt ) variables good signal to background separation used input bdt cut of 0.6 on bdt output minimized total uncertainty signal over background ratio of 1.3 bdt output shown left side figure leptonic top mass distribution using cut of 0.6 on bdt output right ccc table lists uncertainties for 1@xmath3 10@xmath3 of integrated luminosity systematic uncertainties outweigh statistical uncertaintiesmain systematic uncertainties t - channel jes isr fsr luminosity systematics bdt half cut based analysis.uncertainties t - channel 1@xmath3 10@xmath3 integrated luminosity 5@xmath28 single - top quark discovery t - channel 1@xmath3 integrated luminosity needed 30 @xmath3 3@xmath28 evidence s - channel 1 @xmath3 evidence 10 @xmath3 discovery @xmath4-channel systematic uncertainties limiting single - top cross section measurement except s - channel statistics systematics dependence on monte carlo data - driven analysis minimize
| 0.262864
| 1,608
| 824
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,879
|
* in this note we present a universal formula in terms of theta functions for the log- capacity of several segments on a line . the case of two segments was studied by n.i.akhiezer ( 1930 ) ; three segments were considered by a.sebbar and t.falliero ( 2001 ) . * for physicist
the capacity is a coefficient relating the charge and the voltage of a condenser , or equivalently the energy of an electric field inside the condenser under the unit voltage . for mathematician
the capacity is a certain property of a set which shows how massive is it .
this concept turned out to be very usefull in approximation theory , geometric function theory @xcite , partial differential equations , potential theory to name a few . for a compact set in the complex plane its capacity coinsides with the chebyshev constant , the transfinite diameter , conformal radius ( for the simply connected sets ) and a simple formula links it to the robin constant of the set .
let @xmath0 be a collection of @xmath1 segments on a real line : [ edef ] e:=_j=0^g [ e_2j+1,e_2j+2 ] with strictly increasing sequence of endpoints @xmath2 .
we know that the capacity of a set is independent of its translations and homogenious with respect to dilations , so without loss of generality we set the most left point of @xmath0 being @xmath3 and the most right point being @xmath4 : @xmath5 the capacity @xmath6 is defined in terms of the asymptotic of the green s function @xmath7 of this set at infinity : [ cape ] g_e(x)=|x| -c + o(1 ) , x. we are going to deduce a closed formula for @xmath8 in terms of riemann s theta functions so we have to introduce some necessary ( but standard ) constructions related to riemann surfaces .
|
the riemann surface associated to our problem is the double cover of the sphere ramified over the endpoints of the segments from @xmath0 .
this is a genus @xmath9 compact surface @xmath10 with its affine part given by the equation [ x ] w^2=_j=1 ^ 2g+2(x - e_j ) .
the surface admits the hyperelliptic involution @xmath11 with @xmath12 fixed points @xmath13 as well as an anticonformal involution ( reflection ) @xmath14 .
fixed points of the reflection @xmath15 make up the _ real ovals _ of the surface ; fixed points of another anticonformal involution @xmath16 are known as coreal ovals .
coreal ovals cover the set @xmath0 ; real ovals cover the compliment @xmath17 , in particular two points @xmath18 from the same real oval cover the infinity .
we introduce a symplectic basis in the homologies of @xmath10 as shown in the fig .
[ basis ] .
dual basis of holomorphic differentials satisfies the normalization conditions [ dunorm ] _
a_jdu_s:=_js , and generates the period matrix [ pi ] _ b_jdu_s=:_js .
one easily checks that the introduced bases of cycles and differentials behave as follows under the reflection : |ja_s = a_s ; |jb_s =- b_s ; [ du ] _ even _ and those changing sign are called _
odd_. differentials with the property ( [ du ] ) are usually called _ real _ and their periods along even / odd cycles are real / pure imaginary respectively , see @xcite for more details . in paricular , our period matrix @xmath19 is purely imaginary .
standard facts are the symmetry of this matrix and positive definiteness of the imaginary part @xcite .
( 150,55 ) ( 0,0 ) given the period matrix , we define the complex @xmath9-dimensinal torus known as a jacobian of the complex curve @xmath10 : jac(x):=^g / l ( ) , l():=^g+^g .
[ jac ] the abel - jacobi ( aj ) map embeds the curve to its jacobian [ ajmap ] u(p):=_p_1^p du l ( ) jac(x ) , du:=(du_1,du_2, ,du_g)^t .
it is convenient to represent points @xmath20 as the so called theta characteristics , i.e. couple of real g - vector columns @xmath21 : u=(+)/2 .
the points of jacobian in this notation correspond to two vectors with real entries modulo 2 .
second order points of jacobian are @xmath22 matrices with binary entries . in particular , the images of the hyperelliptic involution fixed points @xmath23 the under the aj map ( [ ajmap ] ) are as follows : [ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ] here @xmath24 and @xmath25 are the columns of the identity matrix and the period matrix respectively .
please note that we use a nonstandard notation of theta characteristic as two column vectors written one after another . usually the transposed matrix is used .
the following absolutely convergent series is known as theta function : [ thetadef ] ( u , ) : = _ m^g ( 2i m^tu+i m^tm ) , u^g;=^t^gg ; i m > 0 .
often it is convenient to consider theta function with charachteristics , a slight modification of the latter : [ thetachardef ] ( u , ) : = _ m^g ( 2i(m+)^t(u+)+i ( m+)^t(m+ ) ) @xmath26 matrix argument @xmath19 of theta function may be omitted if it does not lead to a confusion .
vector argument @xmath27 may also be ommited which mean that we set @xmath28 , the value of the theta function is called the theta constant in this case ( note , there remains the dependence on the period matrix ) this function ( [ thetadef ] ) has the following easily checked quasi - periodicity properties with respect to the lattice @xmath29 : [ quasiperiod ] ( u+m+m ; ) = ( -im^tm-2im^tu)(u ; ) , m , m^g .
theta functions with charachteristics have similar transformation rules @xcite which may be easily derived from the above formula and we omit them for brevity . [ remtheta ] ( i ) theta function with integer characteristics @xmath30 $ ] is either even or odd depending on the parity of the inner product @xmath31
. in particular , all odd theta constants are zeroes .
\(ii ) adding matrix with even entries to integer theta characteristics can at most spoil the sign of the theta function .
hence , the binary arithmetic plays a great role in the calculus of theta functions .
theta function may be considered as a multivalued function in the jacobian or as a section of a certain line bundle .
the zero set of theta function
the theta divisor is well defined in the jacobian since the exponential factor in the right hand side of ( [ quasiperiod ] ) does not vanish .
the theta divisor is described by so called riemann vanishing theorems @xcite .
one of the important ingredients in those theorem is a vector of riemann s constants @xmath32 which depends on the choice of homology basis and the initial point in aj map . in
the above setting the vector of riemann s constants may be found by a straightforward computation @xcite or by some combinatorial argument @xcite and corresponds to a characteristic @xmath33^t.\ ] ] zeroes of theta function transferred to the surface by the aj map are described by the following let @xmath34 be a degree @xmath9 positive non - special divisor on the curve @xmath10 , then the function @xmath35 of the argument @xmath36 has exactly @xmath9 zeroes at the points of @xmath34 counting their multiplicities .
[ thr ] here and in what follows we use the standard notions of the function theory on riemann surfaces @xcite .
_ divisor _ is a finite set of points on a surface taken with integer weights : @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 .
the _ degree of a divisor _ is the sum of all weights of participating points : @xmath40 .
_ positive divisor _ is the divisor with positive weights only .
the notion of divisor is very natural and useful in e.g. description of zeroes / poles of meromorphic functions or differentials on a surface . _
_ i__ndex of speciality @xmath41 of a positive divisor @xmath42 is the dimension of the space of holomorphic differentials vanishing at the points of @xmath42 ( counting multiplicities ) .
divisors with index @xmath43 are called _ _
s__pecial , which means that their points are not in generic positions .
two divisors are _ _
l__inearly equivalent iff their difference is a set of zeroes and poles ( latter should be taken with negative multiplicities ) of a meromorphic function .
riemann - roch theorem @xcite says that class of a positive divisor contains a unique element iff this divisor is not special .
the goal of this section is to give a closed expression for the green s function for the collection @xmath0 of aligned segments .
there exists a unique 3rd kind abelian differential @xmath44 with simple poles at two distinguished points @xmath45 of the curve @xmath10 with residues @xmath46 respectively and purely imaginary periods .
normalization conditions for this differential imply that it is real and therefore it s @xmath47 periods ( along even cycles ) vanish @xcite .
green s function for @xmath0 has the representation : [ green ] g_e(x)=|re(_q^p d)| , where the upper limit @xmath48 covers the argument @xmath49 of green s function , @xmath50 and the lower limit @xmath51 lies on the coreal oval , @xmath52
. proof .
we lift the compliment @xmath53 to the riemann surface ( [ x ] ) so that infinity is mapped to the distinguished point @xmath54 of @xmath10 , and call it the top sheet of the surface .
other lifting we call the lower sheet . the function @xmath7 on the top sheet of the surface and @xmath55 on the lower sheet make up a harmonic function with two log poles at @xmath45 .
it is a real part of some 3rd kind abelian integral which has the same normalizations as the introduced above integral @xmath56 .
it remains to check that integral of @xmath44 along any coreal oval is purely imaginary .
this holds since the distinguished differential is real .
the explicit formula for the 3rd kind abelian integrals in terms of theta functions was given yet by riemann @xcite : @xmath57(u(p)+u(\infty_+))}{\theta[\epsilon,\epsilon'](u(p)-u(\infty_+ ) ) } \right| \right|,\ ] ] where @xmath50 and @xmath58 $ ] is the integer ( odd non - singular ) theta charachteristic corresponding to half - period @xmath59 where @xmath60 is a sum of any @xmath61 different branch points : @xmath62 , @xmath63 ; @xmath64 .
proof is based in riemann s theorem on the zeros of theta functions : the divisors @xmath65 are non - special , therefore the fraction @xmath66 as a multivalued function of @xmath67 has a unique zero at @xmath68 and a unique pole at @xmath69 .
same zero and pole has the function @xmath70 , moreover both functions acquire the same factors when the argument @xmath48 goes around the cycles of the surface .
latter claim follows from the transformation rules of theta fuctions ( [ quasiperiod ] ) and riemann bilinear relations @xcite . from liouville s theorem in now follows that both functions differ by a constant nonzero factor .
the usage of theta charachteristics allows us to simplify the expression for the abelian integral .
formula ( [ cape ] ) for the capacity contains yet another ingredient along with the green s function : the independent variable @xmath49 .
the representation for the hyperelliptic projection of the surface ( [ x ] ) to the sphere in terms of variables of jacobian is well known @xcite : @xmath71(u(p))}{\prod_\pm\theta[\epsilon,\epsilon'](u(p)\pm u(\infty_+ ) ) } \frac{\theta^2[\xi,\xi'](u(\infty_+))}{\theta^2[\xi,\xi']}\ ] ] where @xmath58 $ ] is again the integer theta charachteristic corresponding to half - period @xmath59 and @xmath60 is a positive divisor of any @xmath61 different branch points with the exception of first and last ones ; @xmath72=[\epsilon,\epsilon']+[(0\dots0)^t,(1\dots1)^t ] \bmod 2 $ ] proof .
the function @xmath73 on the surface @xmath10 has double pole at @xmath74 and two poles at @xmath75 , same as the fraction @xmath76 it follows from riemann s theorem on zeroes of thetas .
the latter expression is single -valued on the surface and therefore differs by a constant factor from the projection @xmath73 .
this factor may be found if we evaluate both functions at @xmath77 .
the resulting expression may be simplified by the usage of theta charachteristics .
let us assemble the previously obtained formulas : @xmath78(u(p)\mp u(\infty_+))}{\theta[\epsilon,\epsilon'](u(p)\pm u(\infty_+))}\right|=\ ] ] [ main ] =| |^2 . where @xmath58 $ ] is the integer theta charachteristic corresponding to half - period @xmath59 with @xmath60 a positive divisor of any @xmath61 different branch points , except of the first and the last one ; @xmath72=[\epsilon,\epsilon']+[(0\dots0)^t,(1\dots1)^t ] \mod 2 $ ] .
to make this formula computationally effective one has to calculate the period matrix @xmath19 and the image of infinity in the jacobian @xmath79 .
however , there is a way to avoid usage of quadrature rules
see e.g. techniques developed in @xcite .
the latter approach is in particular useful in the cases close to degenerateones when the segments of @xmath0 tend to vanish or merge .
for the verification of the above formula ( [ main ] ) we need the good stock of the sets @xmath0 with analytically known capacities .
we take the inverse polynomial images of segments as such sets .
indeed , let @xmath80 $ ] , with @xmath81 being a degree @xmath82 polynomial .
then the green s function has a simple appearance @xmath83 wherefrom it immediately follows that @xmath84 .
consider chebyshev polynomials @xmath85 of even degrees @xmath86 .
we compute the capacity of the sets @xmath87=[-1 ; \cos\frac{\pi}{4n } ] \cup \bigcup_{s=1}^{n-1 } [ \cos\frac{(4s-1)\pi}{4n } ; \cos\frac{(4s+1)\pi}{4n } ] \cup [ \cos\frac{(4n-1)\pi}{4n } ; 1].\ ] ] by formula ( [ main ] ) and compare it to the analytic value [ capen ] cap(e_n)=2 ^ -1/n .
below we provide the following data for each @xmath88 : period matrix of the associated curve , image of infinity under the abel - jacobi map ( up to the apparent accuracy ) , capacity @xmath89 calculated by formula ( [ main ] ) and its comparison with the value ( [ capen ] ) .
|
riemann surface double cover sphere endpoints segments @xmath0 genus @xmath9 compact surface @xmath10 affine part equation x ] w^2=_j=1 ^ 2g+2(x - e_j ) surface admits hyperelliptic involution @xmath11 @xmath12 fixed points @xmath13 anticonformal involution @xmath14 fixed points reflection @xmath15 real ovals involution @xmath16 coreal ovals ovals cover set @xmath0 cover compliment @xmath17 two points @xmath18 real oval cover infinity symplectic basis homologies @xmath10 fig . dual basis holomorphic differentials satisfies normalization conditions generates period matrix _ b_jdu_s=:_js introduced bases cycles differentials behave under reflection |ja_s = a_s|jb_s =- b_s even changing odd_ differentials property [ du ] real _ periods even / odd cycles real / imaginary period matrix @xmath19 purely imaginary standard facts symmetry positive definiteness imaginary part @xcite150,55 ) 0,0 ) period matrix complex @xmath9-dimensinal torus jacobian curve @xmath10 : jac(x):=^g / l l():=^g+^g abel - jacobi map embeds curve jacobian u(p):=_p_1^p du l jac(x )=(du_1_2_g)^t represent points @xmath20 theta characteristics g - vector columns @xmath21 : u=(+)/2 points jacobian two vectors real entries modulo 2 second order points jacobian @xmath22 matrices binary entries hyperelliptic involution fixed points @xmath23 aj map @xmath24 @xmath25 columns identity matrix period matrix nonstandard notation theta characteristic two column vectors transposed matrix convergent series theta function thetadef = _ m^g ( 2i m^tu+i m^tm ) u^g;=^t^gg ; m > 0 .consider theta function with modification thetachardef ] ( u = m^g ( 2i(m+)^t(u+)+i ( m+)^t(m+ ) ) @xmath26 matrix argument @xmath19 theta omitted confusion vector argument @xmath27 ommited set @xmath28 value theta function theta constant dependence on period matrix function thetadef quasi - periodicity properties @xmath29 quasiperiod ] ( u+m+m ; ) = ( -im^tm-2im^tu)(u ; ) , m , m^g theta functions similar transformation rules derived formula omit for brevity theta function with integer characteristics even or odd parity inner product @xmath31 all odd theta constants are zeroes adding matrix with even entries to integer theta characteristics spoil sign theta function binary arithmetic in calculus theta functions theta function multivalued function in jacobian or section of line bundle zero set theta function theta divisor defined in jacobian exponential factor side quasiperiod vanish divisor described by riemann vanishing theoremsimportant in theorem vector of riemann s constants depends on homology basis initial point in aj map vector riemann s constants found by computation or combinatorial argument corresponds to characteristic @xmath33 zeroes of function transferred to surface by map described @xmath34 be positive non - special divisor on curve function @xmath35 has @xmath9 zeroes at points @xmath34 counting multiplicities standard notions function theory on riemann surfaces divisor is finite set of points on surface with integer weights degree divisor is sum of weights of points positive divisor with positive weights notion divisor useful in description of zeroes / poles of meromorphic functions differentials i__ndex of speciality of positive divisor is dimension of space of holomorphic differentials vanishing at points divisors with index @xmath43 s__pecial points not in generic positions two divisors equivalent difference is set of zeroes and poles negative multiplicities of meromorphic function riemann - roch theorem says class positive divisor contains unique element not specialgoal section closed expression green s function collection @xmath0 aligned segments unique 3rd kind abelian differential @xmath44 simple poles two points @xmath45 curve @xmath10 residues @xmath46 imaginary periods normalization conditions imply real @xmath47 periods vanish @xcite green s function @xmath0 [ green ] g_e(x)=|re(_q^p d)| upper limit @xmath48 covers argument @xmath49 green function lower limit @xmath51 coreal oval @xmath52 lift compliment @xmath53 riemann surface infinity mapped distinguished point @xmath54 @xmath10 top sheet surface lower sheet function @xmath7 @xmath55 lower harmonic function two log poles @xmath45 real part 3rd kind abelian integral same normalizations integral @xmath56 check integral @xmath44 coreal oval imaginary distinguished differential realformula for 3rd kind abelian integrals theta functions by riemann @xmath57(u(p)+u(\infty_+)\theta[\epsilon](u(p)-u(\infty_+ @xmath50 and @xmath58 integer non - theta charachteristic half - period @xmath59 @xmath60 sum of @xmath61 branch points riemann s theorem zeros theta functions divisors @xmath65 non - special fraction @xmath66 multivalued function @xmath67 unique zero at @xmath68 pole at @xmath69 same zero pole function @xmath70 both functions acquire same factors when argument @xmath48 around cycles surface from transformation rules theta fuctions riemann bilinear relations liouville s theorem functions differ by constant nonzero factor theta charachteristics expression abelian integral formula for capacity contains ingredient independent variable @xmath49 representation hyperelliptic projection surface x sphere variables jacobian known @xmath71(u(p)\theta[\epsilon'](u(p u(\infty_+\theta^2[\xi](u(\infty_+)) @xmath58 integer theta charachteristic half - period @xmath59 @xmath60 positive divisor @xmath61 branch points exception first last @xmath72=[\epsilon,\epsilon']+[(0\dots0)^t,(1\dots1)^t ] 2 function @xmath73 surface @xmath10 double pole @xmath74 two poles @xmath75 @xmath76 follows riemann s theorem zeroes thetas latter expression single -valued surface differs constant factor projection @xmath73 factor functions @xmath77 expression simplified theta charachteristics assemble formulas @xmath78(u(p)\mp u(\infty_+))}{\theta[\epsilon,'](u(p)\pm u(\infty_+))}@xmath58 integer theta charachteristic half - period @xmath59 @xmath60 positive divisor @xmath61 branch points except first last @xmath72=[\epsilon,\epsilon']+[(0\dots0)^t,(1\dots1)^t ] \mod 2 $ ] formula effective calculate period matrix @xmath19 image infinity jacobian @xmath79 avoid quadrature rules techniques @xcite useful cases degenerateones segments @xmath0 vanish merge verification formula need stock sets @xmath0 known capacities inverse polynomial images segments sets @xmath80 $ @xmath81 degree @xmath82 polynomial green s function simple appearance @xmath83 follows @xmath84 chebyshev polynomials @xmath85 even degrees @xmath86 compute capacity sets @xmath87=[-1 ; \cos\frac{\pi}{4n } ] \bigcup_{s=1}^{n-1 }\frac{(4s-1)\pi}{4n } formula compare analytic value [ capen ] cap(e_n)=2 ^ -1/n .provide data @xmath88 period matrix curve image infinity abel - jacobi map apparent accuracy capacity @xmath89 calculated formula main ] comparison value [ capen ]
| 0.557081
| 3,126
| 1,658
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,891
|
we consider the low - energy effects of a selected set of lorentz- and cpt - violating quark and gluon operators by deriving the corresponding chiral effective lagrangian . using this effective lagrangian , low - energy hadronic observables can be calculated .
we apply this to magnetometer experiments and derive the best bounds on some of the lorentz - violating coefficients .
we point out that progress can be made by studying the nucleon - nucleon potential , and by considering storage - ring experiments for deuterons and other light nuclei .
|
studies of lorentz violation ( lv ) and cpt violation ( cptv ) arguably are best performed in the context of the general effective - field - theory ( eft ) approach called the standard - model extension ( sme).@xcite the sme lagrangian contains all lv and cptv operators that one can construct from the conventional standard - model fields , coupled to fixed - valued lorentz tensors which parametrize the symmetry breaking and whose values presumably arise from a more fundamental theory .
one of the great merits of the sme is that it provides a concrete and general way for experiments to constrain lv and cptv.@xcite in this respect , clock - comparison , maser , and magnetometer experiments have been particularly successful . as a result
very stringent bounds have been placed on a number of effective neutron and proton coefficients.@xcite however , the connection between these effective coefficients and the quark and gluon coefficients from which they must arise is obscured by the fact that qcd is nonperturbative at the relevant ( low ) energies . in the usual lorentz - symmetric case ,
the low - energy effects of qcd are addressed successfully by the eft of qcd , called chiral perturbation theory ( @xmath0pt ) ( for reviews see , e.g. , ref . ) .
it thus seems natural to extend this approach to the qcd sector of the sme .
the conceptual basis of this extension has been established in our recent paper@xcite in which we treated three cptv and lv quark and gluon operators of mass - dimension five , given by @xmath1 + h_{\mu\nu\rho}\,{\rm tr}\left(g^{\mu\lambda}d^\nu\tilde{g}^{\rho}_{\;\;\;\lambda}\right)\ . \label{lagr1gevq}\ ] ] here , the lv coefficient @xmath2 is fully symmetric on its lorentz indices and @xmath3 , with @xmath4 .
these operators were first written down in ref . and are relevant below the electroweak scale @xmath5 gev , but above the qcd chiral - symmetry breaking scale @xmath6 gev , where @xmath7 mev is the pion decay constant .
the natural expected size of the lv coefficients is @xmath8 , where @xmath9 is the scale at which the lv occurs and is commonly identified with the planck scale @xmath10 gev . because we are interested in observables for non - strange baryons , we have restricted attention to up and down quarks . in the following we outline the approach described in ref .
to ensure that observables that follow from an eft correspond to the ones that arise from the underlying theory , one has to write the most general lagrangian in terms of the relevant low - energy degrees of freedom that is consistent with all the symmetries of the underlying theory.@xcite in the resulting infinite tower of operators , operators of higher mass dimensionality are suppressed by higher powers of a large mass scale , such that for a given required accuracy the set of terms can be truncated .
the suppressing mass scale determines the range of validity for the eft . in the case of @xmath0pt ,
this mass scale is given by @xmath11 and the relevant degrees of freedom at energies below @xmath11 are the pions , nucleons , and photons . particularly important in formulating the effective lagrangian
is the approximate global @xmath12 chiral symmetry of qcd .
this symmetry is explicitly broken by the small quark masses while inspection of the hadron spectrum reveals that it is also spontaneously broken down to its @xmath13 isospin subgroup .
the pions are subsequently identified as the pseudo - goldstone bosons . in the chiral limit ( vanishing quark masses )
the pions only interact through spacetime derivatives .
this allows for a perturbative expansion of hadronic observables in terms of the small parameter @xmath14 , where @xmath15 is the typical momentum of the process under consideration . in ref .
we constructed the effective lagrangian in the @xmath16 formalism of @xmath0pt .
the form of the effective operators is severely constrained by the transformation properties of the operators in eq . under the chiral @xmath16 group as well as under discrete c , p , and t transformations .
the resulting set of non - redundant leading - order nucleon and pion - nucleon operators is given by @xmath17\right)\sigma^{\nu\rho}\mathcal{d}^\mu n \notag \\ & & + \frac{1}{m_n^2}\tilde{h}_{\mu\nu\rho}\bar{n}\gamma^\mu \gamma^5 \mathcal{d}^\nu \mathcal{d}^\rho n + \frac{i}{m_n f_\pi d } \tilde{d}^-_{\mu\nu\rho}\bar{n}(\boldsymbol{\tau}\times\boldsymbol{\pi})_3\sigma^{\nu\rho}\mathcal{d}^\mu
n \notag \\ & & + \mathrm{h.c.}\ , \label{efflagr}\ ] ] where @xmath18 is the nucleon doublet , @xmath19 is the nucleon mass , @xmath20 is the pion triplet , @xmath21 are the pauli matrices , @xmath22 , and @xmath23 is the chiral- and gauge - covariant nucleon derivative , whose explicit form can be found in ref . .
the lv coefficients are given by @xmath24 , @xmath25 , and @xmath26 , with @xmath27 , @xmath28 , and @xmath29 being low - energy constants whose size can not be determined by symmetry considerations , although chiral symmetry gives @xmath30 .
using naive dimensional analysis,@xcite an order - of - magnitude estimation for the low - energy constants can be obtained : @xmath31 and @xmath32 .
the strongest bounds can be set on kinetic nucleon terms , using magnetometer experiments .
these kinetic terms induce a shift in the energy levels of an atom with total angular momentum @xmath33 and projection number @xmath34 . in ref .
we determined that the dominant part of this shift is given by @xmath35\left\langle [ \sigma_3]_{w , n}\right\rangle\ , \ ] ] where @xmath36 labels the particle species ( neutron or proton ) and @xmath18 runs over all particles of that species that are present in the atom .
the unknown matrix elements @xmath37_{w , n}\right\rangle$ ] are defined in the ` stretched ' state @xmath38 and one has to adopt some nuclear - structure model to determine their value . using the results of a @xmath39he/@xmath40xe comagnetometer experiment,@xcite we were able to put the current best bounds on components of @xmath41 and @xmath42 , on the order of @xmath43 gev@xmath44 .
subleading effects of @xmath41 and @xmath42 on atomic energy levels , as well as their effect on spin - precession , can be found in ref . .
the lv @xmath45 coefficient does not show up in these calculations , because it has no kinetic nucleon terms in eq . .
such terms are forbidden by the symmetries . in ref . , we calculated the contribution of @xmath45 to the electromagnetic form factor of the nucleon , through pion loops .
experimental effects of this are suppressed with a factor of @xmath46 with respect to effects of @xmath41 and @xmath42 , due to small electromagnetic fields .
this leads to a best bound on some components of @xmath45 in the order of @xmath47 gev@xmath44 , which does not probe the expected size of @xmath48 . however , despite the lack of kinetic nucleon terms , the @xmath45 coefficient does contribute to one - pion exchange between nucleons.@xcite in future work it might therefore be possible to improve the bounds on @xmath45 by considering the lv nucleon - nucleon ( nn ) potential
. studies of the nn potential and its applications to deuterons and other light nuclei have been performed successfully in the context of chiral eft with discrete - symmetry violations other than cptv ( see ref . for a review ) .
an analogous treatment in the present case is expected to lead to new bounds from atomic experiments or storage - ring experiments for the deuteron or other light nuclei .
the author acknowledges financial support from the portuguese foundation for science and technology ( fct ) under grant sfrh / bpd/101403/2014 and program poph / fse .
|
studies of lorentz violation lv cpt violation best performed in effective - field - theory approach standard - model extension sme). sme lagrangian contains lv cptv operators from conventional standard - model fields to fixed - valued lorentz tensors parametrize symmetry breaking values arise from fundamental theory sme provides concrete way for to constrain lv cptv clock - comparison maser magnetometer experiments successful stringent bounds placed on effective neutron proton coefficients connection between effective coefficients quark gluon coefficients obscured by qcd nonperturbative at relevant low energies lorentz - case low - energy effects of qcd addressed by eft of qcd chiral perturbation theory ( @xmath0pt ) natural to extend approach to qcd sector of sme conceptual basis extension established in recent paper treated three cptv lv quark gluon operators of mass - dimension five by{lagr1gevq lv coefficient @xmath2 symmetric on lorentz indices @xmath4 operators written in ref . relevant below electroweak scale @xmath5 gev above qcd chiral - symmetry breaking scale @xmath6 gev @xmath7 mev pion decay constant natural expected size lv coefficients @xmath8 @xmath9 scale lv identified with planck scale @xmath10 gev non - baryons restricted attention to up down quarks approach ref observables eft underlying theory general lagrangian low - energy degrees of freedom consistent with symmetries theory infinite tower operators higher mass dimensionality suppressed by higher powers large mass scale terms truncated suppressing mass scale determines range validity for eft @xmath0pt mass scale given by @xmath11 relevant degrees of freedom at energies below @xmath11 are pions nucleons photons important lagrangian global @xmath12 chiral symmetry of qcd symmetry broken by small quark masses hadron broken to @xmath13 isospin subgroup pions identified as pseudo - goldstone bosonschiral limit vanishing quark masses pions interact through spacetime derivatives allows perturbative expansion of hadronic observables small parameter @xmath14 @xmath15 typical momentum process constructed effective lagrangian in @xmath16 formalism @xmath0pt form effective operators constrained by transformation properties operators chiral @xmath16 group discrete c p t transformations resulting non - redundant leading - order nucleon pion - nucleon operators given by @xmath17\right\sigma^{\nu\rho}\mathcal{d}^\mu\notag\gamma^5\mathcal{d}^\rho\frac\sigma^{\nu\rho}\mathcal{d}^\mu\notag\mathrm @xmath18 nucleon doublet @xmath19 nucleon mass @xmath20 pion triplet @xmath21 pauli matrices @xmath22 @xmath23 chiral- gauge - covariant nucleon derivative explicit form in ref .lv coefficients given by @xmath24 low - energy constants determined by symmetry chiral symmetry gives @xmath30 dimensional analysis order - of - magnitude estimation for low - energy constants obtained @xmath31 @xmath32 strongest bounds set on kinetic nucleon terms magnetometer experiments terms induce shift in energy levels with total angular momentum @xmath33 projection number @xmath34 dominant part of shift by @xmath35 @xmath36 labels particle species ( neutron or proton @xmath18 runs over particles unknown matrix elements @xmath37 defined in stretched state @xmath38 nuclear - structure model to determine value @xmath39he comagnetometer experiment current best bounds on components @xmath41 @xmath42 order of @xmath43@xmath44 effects of @xmath41 @xmath42 on atomic energy levels spin - precession in ref . lv @xmath45 coefficient show up in calculations no kinetic nucleon terms forbidden by symmetriescalculated contribution @xmath45 to electromagnetic form factor nucleon loops effects suppressed with factor @xmath46 @xmath41 small electromagnetic fields leads best bound components @xmath45 @xmath47@xmath44 probe expected size @xmath48 kinetic nucleon terms @xmath45 coefficient one - pion exchange between nucleons future work improve bounds @xmath45 considering lv nucleon - nucleon nn ) potential studies nn potential applications deuterons light nuclei performed chiral eft discrete - symmetry violations analogous treatment expected lead new bounds atomic experiments storage experiments for deuteron light nuclei author acknowledges financial support portuguese foundation science technology grant sfrh / bpd/101403/2014 program poph / fse
| 0.311258
| 1,898
| 947
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,892
|
for weak decays @xmath0 and @xmath1 the effects of @xmath2 breaking in coupled - channel final - state interaction effects are discussed in a regge framework . it is shown that @xmath2 breaking in the inelastic final - state transitions dramatically affects the phases of the isospin @xmath3 amplitudes in the @xmath4 decays .
the effect of the singlet penguin diagram on these phases is studied .
furthermore , on the example of the @xmath0 decays , the dependence of @xmath5 asymmetries on the size of penguin amplitude is analyzed .
pacs numbers : 13.25.hw , 11.30.hv , 11.80.gw , 12.15.hh
|
final - state interaction ( fsi ) effects play important role in many physical processes , and in particular in various weak decays . these effects may significantly affect determination of fundamental @xmath5-violating parameters since extraction of the latter requires at least some knowledge of fsi .
the role of fsi in b decays was discussed in @xcite .
unfortunately , understanding it constitutes a difficult task for both theory and phenomenology .
our model of coupled - channel final - state interaction is based on a quasielastic approximation and regge pole methods @xcite .
the basic physical idea of regge model is that the high energy behavior of s - channel amplitudes is determined by `` exchanges '' in the crossed channel .
our model considers rescaterings of the type : @xmath6 , where @xmath7 and @xmath8 denote pairs of pseudoscalar mesons : @xmath9 , @xmath1 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 and @xmath12 .
the dominant exchanges in the @xmath13-channel are the pomeron ( @xmath14 ) and the regge trajectories . in that framework
the coupled - channel fsi effects for @xmath15 weak decays into @xmath9 and @xmath1 were discussed in refs .
the calculations @xcite were performed under the assumption of the exchange of the @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 regge trajectories , the trajectories of their @xmath2 partners , and the exactly @xmath2-symmetric pomeron . in this paper
we analyze in some details both the influence of @xmath2 breaking in the pomeron , and the influence of singlet penguin amplitude on the predictions of the quasi - elastic coupled - channel regge approach of ref.@xcite .
if @xmath2 in the pomeron is broken and the singlet penguin is not neglected , the conclusions of refs.@xcite would have to be modified .
we use the following phase conventions for pseudoscalar mesons : @xmath20 for cabibbo - suppressed @xmath21 decays there are nine possible final states composed of two pseudoscalar mesons . in the basis of definite isospin @xmath22 the symmetrized two - boson states @xmath23 are : @xmath24 quark diagram amplitudes ------------------------ the decays of @xmath21 mesons to two pseudoscalar mesons ( @xmath7 ) are described by 7 flavor-@xmath2 invariant amplitudes @xcite , but only 4 of them ( fig . [ 4d ] ) : `` tree '' ( @xmath25 ) , `` color - suppressed '' ( @xmath26 ) , `` penguin '' ( @xmath27 ) and additional penguin involving flavor-@xmath2-singlet ( @xmath28 ) diagrams , are important @xcite .
we assume that @xmath29 , with @xmath30 @xcite , @xmath31 @xcite and latexmath:[$|s|\approx(0.6\pm0.2 ) -flavor amplitudes for the decays of b mesons to a pair of light pseudoscalar mesons .
( @xmath25 ) `` tree '' ; ( @xmath26 ) `` color - suppressed '' ; ( @xmath27 ) `` penguin '' ; ( @xmath28 ) additional penguin involving flavor-@xmath2-singlet .
[ 4d],scaledwidth=40.0% ] short - distance amplitudes : @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 , have weak and strong phases .
we can write : @xmath33 where @xmath34 , @xmath35 , ( @xmath36 ) are weak ( strong ) phases .
it is possible that the short - distance weak amplitudes have large strong phases .
however , since we want to study fsi we neglect these phases ( i.e. we set @xmath37 ) . for the weak phases we assume @xcite @xmath38
furthermore , we neglect the electroweak penguins diagrams @xcite . in terms of quark diagram
amplitudes the weak decays of @xmath15 to the states defined in eq .
[ states ] are given by : @xmath39 we assumed @xmath2 symmetry in weak decays , i.e. equal amplitudes for the production of strange ( @xmath40 ) and nonstrange quark pairs .
the weak amplitude @xmath41 is changed by isospin - conserving strong interaction @xmath42 in the final state @xcite into a fsi - corrected weak amplitude @xmath43 : @xmath44 where subscript @xmath22 denotes isospin .
we describe @xmath42 in the regge pole model as used in @xcite-@xcite . in the energy range
@xmath45 gev@xmath46 the pomeron ( @xmath14 ) contribution to the @xmath13-channel amplitude is phenomenologically well described by the formula @xcite @xmath47 where the residue @xmath48 and slope @xmath49 depend on the scattering process considered .
calculations of the s - channel @xmath50 waves @xmath51 , give , for the pomeron @xcite : @xmath52 from @xcite we obtain @xmath53 and @xmath54 the simple relations between @xmath55 , @xmath56 and @xmath57 , @xmath58 for broken @xmath2 are given by @xmath59 and @xmath60 from eqs .
[ a_p ] [ b_p ] we find : @xmath61 in the @xmath2 symmetric case we have @xmath62 mbgev@xmath46 .
many authors restrict their studies to elastic rescattering only . in regge language
this is described in terms of a pomeron exchange .
but at @xmath63 contributions from other inelastic nonleading regge exchanges are not completely negligible @xcite . )
uncrossed reggeon exchange , ( @xmath64 ) crossed reggeon exchange .
[ cu],scaledwidth=38.0% ] there are two types of contributions from exchange - degenerate reggeons corresponding to two different diagrams ( crossed @xmath64 and uncrossed @xmath65 , see fig .
the contributions of diagrams @xmath65 and @xmath64 differ in their phases @xcite.the calculations of the @xmath66-channel @xmath50 partial waves amplitudes @xmath67 for uncrossed reggeon exchange and @xmath68 for crossed reggeon exchange give @xcite : @xmath69 and @xmath70 where @xmath71 is the regge residue fitted from experiment @xcite,@xcite : @xmath72 and @xmath73 the scale factor @xmath74 is taken as @xmath75 .
inelastic fsi means here the coupled - channel effects of the type : @xmath76 , @xmath77 , @xmath78 , , and @xmath79 , @xmath77 , @xmath78 , etc in the final state .
inclusion of such processes was shown in @xcite to be very important .
there are tree separate non - communicating fsi sectors of different isospin @xmath80 . in the @xmath81 sector
one obtains only the contribution from the crossed diagram of fig .
[ cu ] : @xmath82=0,\ ] ] @xmath83=2.\ ] ] in the @xmath84 sector there are three states , and consequently we have coupled - channel effects described together with quasi - elastic effects by two @xmath85 matrices .
one obtains : @xmath86 = \left [ \begin{array}{ccc } \epsilon^2 & \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\epsilon & \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\epsilon \\ \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\epsilon & \frac{4}{3 } & \frac{2}{3}\sqrt{2 } \\ \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\epsilon & \frac{2}{3}\sqrt{2 } & \frac{2}{3 } \end{array } \right]\ ] ] and @xmath87\\ = \left [ \begin{array}{ccc } 0 & -\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}{|\epsilon| } & 2\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}|\epsilon| \\ -\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}{|\epsilon| } & \frac{4}{3 } & \frac{2}{3}\sqrt{2 } \\
2\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}|\epsilon| & \frac{2}{3}\sqrt{2 } & \frac{2}{3 } \end{array } \right].\ ] ] the states in the rows and columns are ( from top to bottom and from left to right ) : @xmath88 , @xmath89 and @xmath90 . in the @xmath91 sector
there are five states with rows and columns corresponding to the states ( from top to bottom and from left to right ) : @xmath92 , @xmath93 , @xmath94 , @xmath95 and @xmath96 .
one obtains : + @xmath97 @xmath98\ ] ] and @xmath99=$ ] @xmath100.\ ] ] the parameter @xmath101 ( @xmath102 ) describes suppression of propagation of one ( two ) strange quarks in the @xmath13-channel . for the @xmath2 discussion of coupled - channel effects @xmath103 @xcite .
a more realistic assumption used in this paper is : + @xmath104 where @xmath105 and @xmath106 are reggeon s parameters .
let us now connect weak decays and strong interactions in the final state .
we can obtain amplitudes @xmath107 of @xmath21 decay to states @xmath108 from : @xmath109 with @xmath110 are eigenvectors for @xmath111 matrices .
we assume now that the fsi - corrected weak decay amplitudes differ from quark - level expressions eq .
[ diagrams ] by hadronic phase factors only ( @xmath112 ) @xcite,@xcite . using eq .
[ main1 ] one obtains the numbers given in the right - hand side of tables [ tab1 ] , [ tab2 ] and in table [ tab3 ] . for the sake of comparison , in the left - hand side of table [ tab1 ] , [ tab2 ] we added amplitude phases with @xmath2 symmetric fsi ( table [ tab1 ] )
, as well as amplitude phases calculated without fsi effects ( table [ tab2 ] ) .
.comparison of calculated values of amplitude phases for @xmath21 decays with weak phases set to @xmath113 . [
cols="<,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] one has to realize , that for l=0 partial wave amplitudes the regge pole methods need not be reliable @xcite and , consequently , the obtained numbers should be considered as rough estimates only . in additional to fsi effects and hadronic phases of bare weak diagrams , @xmath5 violation effects
may strongly depend on electroweak diagrams @xcite , but there is not enough data to determine the corresponding parameters .
in summary , we have discussed the effect of abandoning exact @xmath2 in coupled - channel final - state interactions through reggeon exchange for @xmath114 .
@xmath2 was broken by admitting lower lying trajectories for strange reggeons @xmath115 ( eq .
( [ epsilon ] ) ) and in the pomeron ( eq . ( [ pomeron ] ) )
couplings . as expected in @xcite the singlet penguin diagram may be neglected in intermediate states of @xmath116 decays .
however , it can not be neglected in decays to @xmath11 , @xmath10 , and @xmath12 .
we have shown that strong fsi play an important role in the analysis of @xmath5-violating effects in @xmath117 decays .
the size of @xmath5 asymmetry in @xmath118 decays has been shown to depend strongly on the ratio of penguin to tree amplitude and on the strong phases of short - distance quark diagrams .
99 p. enczykowski , _ acta phys . pol .
_ * b28 * , 1605 ( 1997 ) .
donoghue _ et al .
_ , _ phys .
rev . _ * d33 * , 1516 ( 1986 ) .
l. wolfenstein , _ phys .
rev . _ * d52 * , 537 ( 1995 ) .
grard and j. weyers , _ eur
. phys . j. _ * c7 * , 1 ( 1999 ) .
d. delpine , j .-
grard , j. pestieau , j. weyers , _ phys . lett . _ * b429 * , 106 ( 1998 ) .
grard , j. pestieau , j. weyers , _ phys .
lett . _ * b436 * , 363 ( 1998 ) .
p. enczykowski , _ phys .
* b460 * , 390 ( 1999 ) .
enczykowski , _ acta phys . pol .
_ * b33 * 1833 ( 2002 ) .
m. gronau and j.l .
rosner , _ phys .
rev . _ * d58 * , 113005 ( 1998 ) .
k. anikeev _ at al .
_ , hep - ph/0201071
. z. luo and j.l rosner , _ phys .
rev . _ * d65 * , 054027 ( 2002 ) .
j.l rosner , in _ flavor physics for the millennium _
, p431 ( boulder 2000 ) , [ hep - ph/0011355 ] .
k.m .watson , _ phys . rev . _ * 88 * , 1163 ( 1952 ) .
r. seber , _ phys .
* 13 * , 32 ( 1964 ) . v. barger and r.j.n .
phillips , _ nucl .
phys . _ * b32 * , 93 ( 1971 ) .
b. aubcrt , _ et al._,_phys .
rev . _ * d66 * , 054024 ( 2002 ) .
the babar colaboration , hep - ph/0207065 .
et al . _ , cleo collaboration , _ phys .
* 85 * , 525 ( 2000 ) .
m. gronau and j.l rosner , _ phys .
rev . _ * d65 * , 093012 ( 2002 ) .
xing , _ phys .
* b493 * , 301 ( 2000 ) .
chua , w.s .
hou , k.c .
yang , hep - ph/0210002 .
|
final - state interaction fsi effects in physical processes weak decays affect @xmath5-violating parameters requires knowledge fsi role fsi in decays discussed in @xcite understanding difficult model of coupled - channel final state interaction based on quasielastic approximation regge pole methods high energy behavior of s - channel amplitudes determined by exchanges in crossed channel model considers rescaterings @xmath6 @xmath7 denote pseudoscalar mesons @xmath9 dominant exchanges in @xmath13-channel are pomeron ( @xmath14 ) regge trajectories coupled - channel fsi effects for @xmath15 weak decays into @xmath9 @xmath1 discussed in refs calculations under exchange @xmath16 @xmath19 regge trajectories @xmath2 partners @xmath2-symmetric pomeron paper analyze influence of @xmath2 breaking pomeron singlet penguin amplitude on predictions quasi - elastic coupled - channel regge approach if @xmath2 pomeron broken singlet penguin not neglected conclusions of.@xcite modifieduse phase conventions pseudoscalar mesons @xmath20 cabibbo - suppressed @xmath21 decays nine final states two pseudoscalar mesons isospin @xmath22 two - boson states @xmath23 @xmath24 quark diagram amplitudes decays @xmath21 mesons to two pseudoscalar mesons @xmath7 described 7 flavor-@xmath2 invariant amplitudes 4 fig 4d tree color - suppressed penguin additional penguin flavor-@xmath2-singlet diagrams important assume @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 latexmath -flavor amplitudes decays mesons light pseudoscalar mesons @xmath25 `` tree color - suppressed penguin @xmath28 additional penguin flavor-@xmath2-singlet short - distance amplitudes @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 have weak strong phases write @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xmath36 weak strong phases possible short - distance weak amplitudes have large strong phases neglect phases set @xmath37 )weak phases assume @xcite @xmath38 neglect electroweak penguins diagrams quark diagram amplitudes weak decays @xmath15 states given @xmath39 @xmath2 symmetry weak decays equal amplitudes strange nonstrange quark pairs weak amplitude @xmath41 changed isospin - conserving interaction @xmath42 fsi - corrected weak amplitude @xmath43 @xmath44 denotes isospin @xmath42 regge pole model @xcite- energy range @xmath45@xmath46 pomeron @xmath14 contribution @xmath13-channel amplitude formula @xcite @xmath47 residue slope depend scattering process calculations s - channel @xmath50 waves @xmath51 pomeron @xcite @xmath52 obtain @xmath53 @xmath54 relations between @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath2 given @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath2 symmetric case @xmath62 mbgev@xmath46 studies elastic rescattering pomeron exchange @xmath63 contributions inelastic nonleading exchanges negligibleuncrossed reggeon exchange @xmath64 crossed=38.0% two contributions from exchange - degenerate reggeons diagrams crossed @xmath64 uncrossed @xmath65 contributions differ phases calculations @xmath66-channel @xmath50 partial waves amplitudes @xmath67 uncrossed @xmath68 crossed give @xcite @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 regge residue experiment @xmath72 @xmath73 scale factor @xmath74 @xmath75 inelastic fsi coupled - channel effects @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 final state inclusion processes @xcite important tree separate non - fsi sectors different isospin @xmath80 @xmath81 sector contribution from crossed diagram @xmath82=0 @xmath83=2. @xmath84 sector three states coupled - channel effects quasi - elastic effects two @xmath85 matricesobtains @xmath86{array}{ccc\epsilon^2 \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\epsilon\frac{2}{3}}\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\epsilon \frac{4}{3 } \frac{2}{3}\sqrt{2\frac{2}{3}}\epsilon\frac{2}{3}\sqrt{2 }\frac{2}{3 }{array @xmath87\\{array}{ccc } -\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\epsilon|\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\epsilon\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\epsilon \frac{4}{3 } \frac{2}{3}\sqrt{2 } 2\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}|\epsilon| \frac{2}{3}\sqrt{2 } \frac{2}{3 }\end{array } states rows columns @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath91 sector five states rows columns @xmath92 obtains @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100.parameter @xmath101 describes suppression propagation strange quarks in @xmath13-channel @xmath2 discussion coupled - channel effects @xmath103 @xcite realistic assumption is @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 are reggeon s parameters connect weak decays strong interactions in final state obtain amplitudes @xmath107 of @xmath21 decay to states @xmath108 @xmath109 @xmath110 eigenvectors for @xmath111 matrices fsi - corrected weak decay amplitudes differ from quark - level expressions by hadronic phase factors ( @xmath112 ) @xcite obtains numbers right tables tab1 tab3 added amplitude phases with @xmath2 fsi phases calculated without fsi effects.comparison of calculated values amplitude phases for @xmath21 decays with weak phases set to @xmath113 l=0 partial wave amplitudes regge pole methods need not reliable obtained numbers rough estimates additional fsi effects hadronic phases @xmath5 violation effects depend on electroweak diagrams @xcite not enough data to determine parametersdiscussed effect abandoning @xmath2 in coupled - channel final state interactions reggeon exchange for @xmath114 @xmath2 broken admitting lower lying trajectories for strange reggeons @xmath115 pomeron couplings singlet penguin diagram neglected in intermediate states @xmath116 decays not neglected in decays @xmath11 strong fsi important analysis @xmath5-violating effects in @xmath117 decays size @xmath5 asymmetry in @xmath118 decays on ratio penguin to tree amplitude strong phases short - distance quark diagrams enczykowski acta phys . pol b28 * 1605 ( 1997 ) donoghue et al . phys . rev. d33 1516 ( 1986 ) wolfenstein phys . rev d52 537 ( 1995 ) grard j. weyers phys c7 * 1 ( 1999 ) delpine grard pestieau weyers b429 106 ( 1998 ) b436 363 ( 1998 ) enczykowski b460 390 ( 1999 ) enczykowski acta phys b33 1833 ( 2002 ) gronau j rosner phys rev d58 113005 ( 1998 ) anikeev hep - ph/0201071 z luo j.l rosner phys rev d65 054027 ( 2002 ).l rosner flavor physics millennium p431 boulder 2000 ) hep - ph/0011355.watson rev 88 1163 ( 1952 ) seber 13 32 ( 1964 ) v. barger r phillips phys b32 93 ( 1971 ) aubcrt rev d66 054024 ( 2002 ) babar colaboration hep - ph/0207065 cleo collaboration 85 525 ( 2000 ) m gronau j.l rosner rev d65 093012 ( 2002 ) xing phys b493 301 ( 2000 ) chua hou yang hep - ph/0210002
| 0.497576
| 3,365
| 1,789
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,896
|
we investigate the tricritical point in the lattice fermion gauge scalar model with u(1 ) gauge symmetry . in the vicinity of this point , in the phase with the broken chiral symmetry , we observe the scaling behavior of the chiral condensate and of the masses of composite fermion and composite scalar , indicating the existence of an interesting continuum limit of the model at this point .
|
the lattice 4d fermion - gauge scalar ( @xmath0 ) model with u(1 ) gauge symmetry has at quite strong gauge coupling , @xmath1 , a tricritical point frje95a , frfr95a .
the nature of the continuum limit taken at this point is not known .
when this point ( point e in fig .
[ fig:1 ] ) is approached from the phase with spontaneously broken global chiral symmetry and a massive fermion @xmath2 ( nambu phase ) , the mass @xmath3 scales .
the fermion @xmath4 is composed of the fundamental fermion ( @xmath5 ) and scalar ( @xmath6 ) fields and is unconfined .
this raises the hope that a nonperturbatively renormalizable theory with dynamical fermion mass generation might be obtained frje95a .
motivated by this interesting possibility we have started an investigation of the scaling behavior of various observables in the vicinity of the point e. we find that apart from @xmath3 also the mass @xmath7 of a composite scalar boson @xmath8 scales in the vicinity of e. this , as well as some other properties frfr95a make the point distinctly different from the ( nonrenormalizable algo95 ) nambu jona - lasinio model found in the strong coupling limit of the @xmath0 model leshr87a .
this , as well as the experience that tricritical points give rise to the scaling behavior different from that associated with the adjacent critical points lasa84 , contributes to the hope that the point e might correspond to a renormalizable theory .
as reported in frje96c , in 2d an analogous @xmath9 model seems to belong to the universality class of the 2d gross - neveu model and is thus probably renormalizable .
the action is @xmath10 where @xmath11\ ! \nonumber\\ & & + \ , a m_0 \sum_x { \overline{\chi}}_x \chi_x \ ; , \label{sch } \\ s_u \hspace{-2mm}&=&\hspace{-2 mm } \beta \ , \sum_{\rm p } \left [ 1 - { \mathop{\rm re}\nolimits}u_{\rm p } \right ] \ ; , \label{su } \\ s_\phi \hspace{-2mm}&=&\hspace{-2 mm }
- { \kappa}\ , \sum_x \sum_{\mu=1}^4 \left [ \phi_x^\dagger u_{x,\mu } \phi_{x + \mu } \,+\ , { \rm h.c . } \right ] \ ; . \label{sph}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath12 is the plaquette product of link variables @xmath13 and @xmath14 .
the gauge field link variables @xmath13 are elements of the compact gauge group u(1 ) . the complex scalar field @xmath6 of charge one satisfies the constraint latexmath:[$|\phi infinite ) when the squared bare scalar mass is positive ( negative ) infinite .
the staggered fermion field @xmath5 of charge one leads to the global u(1 ) chiral symmetry of the model in the chiral limit , i.e. when the bare fermion mass @xmath16 vanishes .
the model is meant in the chiral limit , @xmath17 .
however , numerical simulations require nonvanishing @xmath16 and thus also analytic considerations have to include the bare mass .
we therefore show in fig .
[ fig:1 ] schematic phase diagram of the model in the @xmath18 space .
it illustrates that the tricritical point e is indeed a point in which three critical lines meet : * line ne where @xmath3 and goldstone boson mass @xmath19 simultaneously smoothly vanish .
* lines ee@xmath20 and ee@xmath21 with vanishing @xmath7 .
the nambu phase below the ne line at @xmath22 is characterized by @xmath23 and @xmath24 .
the limit cases are * @xmath25 : 4d xy model and free fermion field .
* @xmath26 : nambu - jona - lasinio model with bare mass . *
@xmath27 : u(1 ) higgs model without fermions .
* @xmath28 : compact qed with charged fermion field . * @xmath29 : free fermion field .
as is apparent from fig .
[ fig:1 ] , an approach to the tricritical point requires in principle tuning of three parameters
. obviously also the lattice sizes have to be varied .
but the tricritical points have frequently rather large domains ( angles ) of dominance lasa84 .
therefore it is reasonable to fix @xmath30 , which is our current best estimate of the position of the point e in the @xmath31 direction , and vary only @xmath32 and @xmath33 . even so an investigation of the scaling behavior is a tremendous task .
we can present only some preliminary results obtained for @xmath34 and , rather incomplete , also for @xmath35 , without a proper analytic analysis and in particular without taking into account finite size effects . in fig .
[ fig:2 ] we show the chiral condensate @xmath36 .
an onset of the genuine chiral phase transition is indicated with decreasing @xmath32 .
the fermion mass @xmath3 ( fig .
[ fig:3 ] ) behaves similarly .
the transition appears to be smooth , i.e. of 2@xmath37 order , close to @xmath38 . in fig .
[ fig:4 ] we show the scalar boson mass @xmath7 .
the position of the minimum for each @xmath32 corresponds roughly to the crossection of a continuation to smaller @xmath39 of the nearly horizontal `` wing '' with the @xmath30 plane .
as @xmath32 decreases , the minimum seems to approach the @xmath33 value at which the chiral phase transition at @xmath22 is expected on the basis of figs . 2 and 3 .
thus we are indeed in a close vicinity of the tricritical point . fig .
[ fig:5 ] contains very preliminary results for several @xmath40 ( meson ) masses . for comparison
we show also data for @xmath41
. the goldstone boson mass @xmath19 is small around the transition as expected .
the fact that the @xmath42- and @xmath43- masses cross the @xmath41 line in the vicinity of the phase transition indicates that in the nambu phase these mesons can be interpreted as bound states and that their masses scale similarly to @xmath3 and thus may exist also in the continuum limit .
this is a hint that the spectrum of the underlying continuum theory might be quite complex .
our present results suggest that it is worthwhile to continue the investigation of the tricritical point e. for this purpose the full scaling theory of tricritical points lasa84 and a finite size scaling theory in their vicinity will have to be applied .
some analytic insight into the properties of the model in the relevant coupling region is highly desirable .
|
lattice 4d fermion - gauge scalar @xmath0 model with u(1 ) gauge symmetry has strong gauge coupling @xmath1 tricritical point nature continuum limit point not known point point e fig approached from phase with broken global chiral symmetry massive fermion @xmath2 nambu phase mass @xmath3 scales fermion @xmath4 fundamental fermion @xmath5 scalar @xmath6 ) fields unconfined hope renormalizable theory with dynamical fermion mass generation obtained started investigation of scaling behavior of observables vicinity point e mass @xmath7 of composite scalar boson @xmath8 scales vicinity e properties make point different from nonrenormalizable nambu jona - lasinio model in strong coupling limit @xmath0 model tricritical points scaling behavior different hope point e might correspond to renormalizable theory analogous @xmath9 model universality class of 2d gross - neveu model probably renormalizableaction @xmath10 @xmath11\nonumber\\ + \sum_x\overline\chi}}_x \label{sch } \hspace{-2mm} mm \sum_{\rm p } \mathop{\rm\nolimits{\rm p\label{su \hspace{-2mm}\hspace{-2 mm \sum_x{\mu=1}^4 \phi_x^\dagger{x,\mu _{x + \mu } h.c\label{sph}\end{aligned} @xmath12 plaquette product link variables @xmath13 @xmath14 gauge field link variables compact gauge group u(1 ) complex scalar field @xmath6 satisfies constraint latexmath:$\phi infinite squared bare scalar mass positive infinite staggered fermion field @xmath5 leads global u(1 ) chiral symmetry model chiral limit bare fermion mass @xmath16 vanishes model chiral limit @xmath17 numerical simulations require nonvanishing @xmath16 analytic considerations include bare mass fig schematic phase diagram model @xmath18 spacetricritical point e three critical lines meet line ne @xmath3 goldstone boson mass @xmath19 vanish lines ee@xmath20@xmath21 vanishing @xmath7 nambu phase below ne line at @xmath22 by @xmath23 @xmath24 limit cases @xmath25 : 4d xy model free fermion field @xmath26 : nambu - jona - lasinio model bare mass @xmath27 : u(1 ) higgs model without fermions @xmath28 : compact qed charged fermion field @xmath29 : free fermion field approach tricritical point requires tuning of three parameters lattice sizes tricritical points large domains dominance fix @xmath30 point e @xmath31 direction vary @xmath32 @xmath33 investigation of scaling behavior task preliminary results for @xmath34 @xmath35 without analytic analysis finite size effects fig chiral condensate @xmath36 onset chiral phase transition decreasing @xmath32 fermion mass @xmath3 similarly transition smooth 2@xmath37 order close to @xmath38 figfig:4 ] scalar boson mass @xmath7 minimum @xmath32 corresponds crossection continuation smaller @xmath39 horizontal wing @xmath30 plane @xmath32 decreases minimum @xmath33 value chiral phase transition at @xmath22 expected figs 2 3 close vicinity tricritical point fig:5 ] preliminary results @xmath40 masses comparison data @xmath41 goldstone boson mass @xmath19 small around transition @xmath42- @xmath43- masses cross @xmath41 line phase transition nambu phase mesons interpreted bound states masses scale similarly to @xmath3 may exist in continuum limit hint underlying continuum theory might be complex results suggest continue investigation tricritical point e full scaling theory of tricritical points lasa84 finite size scaling theory vicinity applied analytic insight into properties model relevant coupling region desirable
| 0.264148
| 1,594
| 843
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,903
|
we give a short description of the project to install roman pot detectors at 220 m from the interaction point in atlas .
this project is dedicated to hard diffractive measurements at high luminosity .
|
the motivation to install roman pot detectors at 220 m within atlas is quite clear .
it extends nicely the project of measuring the total cross sections using roman pots at 240 m @xcite by measuring hard diffraction at high luminosity in atlas in the lhc . as we will see in the following , it is also complementary to the fp420 project which aims at tagging protons at 420 m. the physics motivation of this project corresponds to different domains of diffraction : * a better understanding of the inclusive diffraction mechanism at the lhc by studying in detail the structure of pomeron in terms of quarks and gluons as it was done at hera @xcite . of great importance
is also the measurement of the exclusive production of diffractive events @xcite and its cross section in the jet channel as a function of jet transverse momentum .
its understanding is necessary to control the background to higgs signal .
* looking for higgs boson diffractive production in double pomeron exchange in the standard model or supersymmetric extensions of the standard model @xcite .
this is clearly a challenging topic especially at low higgs boson masses where the higgs boson decays in @xmath0 and the standard non - diffractive search is possible .
we will detail in the following the trigger strategy .
* sensitivity to the anomalous coupling of the photon by measuring the qed production cross section of @xmath1 boson pairs . this might be the best way to access the anomalous coupling before the start of the ilc .
* photoproduction of jets * other topics such as looking for stop events or measuring the top mass using the threshold scan method @xcite which will depend strongly on the production cross section .
we propose to install roman pots in atlas at 216 and 224 m on each side of the main atlas detectors .
the project is a collaboration between the physics institutes and universities of prague , cracow , stony brook , michigan state university , lpnhe ( paris 6 ) , giessen , and in addition the university of chicago and the argonne national laboratory for the timing detectors .
the roman pot design follows as close as possible the design which is currently used by the totem collaboration and the luminosity group of the atlas collaboration which aims at measuring the total cross section using roman pots at 240 m. the only difference is that we only need the horizontal arms and not the vertical arms since hard diffractive protons are scattered horizontally .
we will follow the totem experience to build the roman pots in vakuum praha and to use the same technics for the step motors and the lvdt system .
r0.5 assuming one can go down to 10 ( resp . 15 ) @xmath2 from the beam center , it is possible to measure protons with @xmath3 , and @xmath4 on each side of atlas ( resp .
@xmath5 , @xmath6 ) where @xmath7 is the momentum fraction of the initial proton carried away by the pomeron @xcite .
this can be translated in missing mass acceptance as illustrated in fig 1 .
the missing mass acceptance using only the 220 m pots starts at 135 gev , but increases slowly as a function of missing mass .
it is clear that one needs both fp420 and rp220 projects , or in other words the possibility to detect scattered protons at 220 and 420 m to obtain a good acceptance on a wide range of masses since most events are asymmetric ( one tag at 220 m and another one at 420 m ) .
the precision on mass reconstruction using either two tags at 220 m or one tag at 220 m and another one at 420 m is of the order of 2 - 3 % on the full mass range .
this shows the advantage of this measurement which allows to give a very good mass resolution on a wide range of masses , and thus to detect higgs bosons at low masses decaying into @xmath0 .
the idea is to enhance the signal over background ratio by benefitting from the good resolution of the detectors and the suppression of the @xmath8 jet background due to the @xmath9 suppression rule for @xmath8 jet exclusive production .
we propose to put inside the roman pots two kinds of detectors , namely silicon detectors to measure precisely the position of the diffracted protons , and the mass of the produced object , such as the higgs boson , and @xmath7 , and precise timing detectors .
the position detectors will consist in either five layers of silicon strips of 50 @xmath10 m and two additional layers used for triggering , or 3d silicon detectors if they are available industrially by the time we need to instal the roman pots .
if the silicon strip option is chosen , there will be four different orientations , namely x , y , u , and v ( u and v being orientated within 45 degrees with respect to x and y ) .
the strip size will be 50 @xmath10 m and the detector size about 2 cm , which allows a measurement up to @xmath11 .
the silicon strip detectors will be edgeless which means that the dead edge will be of the order of 30 - 50 @xmath10 m so that we can move the detector as close to the beam as possible without losing some acceptance due to the dead edge .
the detectors will be read out by the standard abcnext chip being developped in cracow for the silicon detector of atlas .
the latency time of the abcnext chip is of the order of 3.5 @xmath10s which gives enough time to send back the local l1 decision from the roman pots to atlas ( see the next paragraph about trigger for more detail ) , and to receive the l1 decision from atlas , which means a distance of about 440 m. it is also foressen to perform a slight modification of the abcnext chip to include the trigger possibilities into the chip .
the other option is to use 3d silicon detectors using the same readout system as before ( abcnext chip ) .
these detectors use a lateral electric field , instead of vertical in conventional planar techniques .
holes of the order of 10 @xmath10 m crossing the full thickness of the detector are filled with a conductive medium in order to collect the ionisation ( electrons or holes ) depending on the applied bias .
both kinds of options will be tested in prague and in saclay using the full electronics chain ( including the abcnext chip ) and a laser or a radioactive source .
beam tests at desy or cern are also foreseen .
it is planed to install the roman pot together with the silicon detectors during a shut down of the lhc in 2009 - 2010 .
the timing detectors are necessary at the highest luminosity of the lhc to identify from which vertex the protons are coming from .
it is expected that up to 35 interactions occur at the same bunch crossing and we need to identify from which interaction , or from which vertex the protons are coming from .
a precision of the order of a few mm or 5 - 10 ps is required to distinguish between the different vertices and to make sure that the diffracted protons come from the hard interactions .
picosecond timing detectors are still a challenge and are developped in a collaboration between saclay , stony brook , the university of chicago and argonne national laboratory for medical and particle physics applications .
the proton timings will be measured in a crystal of about 2.5 cm located inside the roman pots , and the signal will be read out by micro - channel plates photomultipliers developped by photonis .
the space resolution of those detectors should be of the order of a few mm since at most two protons will be detected in those detectors for one given bunch crossing at the highest luminosity .
the detectors are read out with a constant fraction discriminator which allows to improve the timing resolution significantly compared to usual electronics . a first version of the timing detectors is expected to be ready in 2009 - 2010 with a worse resolution of 40 - 50 ps , and the final version by 2012 with a resolution of 5 - 10 ps .
in this section , we would like to give the principle of the trigger using the roman pots at 220 m as well as the rates obtained using a simulation of the atlas detector and trigger framework .
the principle of the trigger is shown in fig . 2 in the case of a higgs boson decaying into @xmath0 as an example .
the first level trigger comes directly from two different silicon strip layers in each roman pot detector .
it is more practical to use two dedicated planes for triggering only since it allows to use different signal thresholds for trigger and readout .
the idea is to send at most five strip addresses which are hit at level 1 .
a local trigger is defined at the roman pot level on each side of the atlas experiment by combining the two trigger planes in each roman pot and the roman pots as well .
if the hits are found to be compatible ( not issued by noise but by real protons ) , the strip addresses are sent to atlas , which allows to compute the @xmath7 of each proton , and the diffractive mass .
this information is then combined with the information coming from the central atlas detector , requesting for instance two jets above 40 gev in the case shown in fig .
2 . at l2 ,
the information coming from the timing detectors for each diffracted proton can be used and combined with the position of the main vertex of atlas to check for compatibility . once
a positive atlas trigger decision is taken ( even without any diffracted proton ) , the readout informations coming from the roman pot detectors are sent to atlas as any subdetector . *
* trigger on dpe events at 220 m : * this is the easiest situation since two protons can be requested at level 1 at 220 m. three different options are considered : * - trigger on high mass higgs * ( @xmath12 gev ) given by atlas directly ( decay in @xmath13 , @xmath14 ) , by requesting two high @xmath15 jets and two positive tags in roman pots , ( high @xmath15 jets given directly by atlas , and low @xmath15 jet special trigger for qcd studies highly prescaled ) .
this configuration will not rise any problem concerning the l1 rate since most of the events will be triggered by atlas anyway , and the special diffractive triggers will be for qcd measurements and can be highly prescaled .
* * trigger on dpe events at 220 and 420 m * this is the most delicate scenario since the information from the 420 m pots can not be included at l1 .
the strategy is the following ( see table 1 ) : ( higgs ... ) decaying in @xmath0 by requesting a positive tag ( one side only ) at 220 m with @xmath16 ( due to the @xmath17 rp acceptance in @xmath7 , the proton momentum fractional loss in the @xmath18 roman pot can not be too high if the higgs mass is smaller than @xmath19 ) , and topological cuts on jets such as the exclusiveness of the process ( @xmath20 , @xmath21 , where @xmath22 are the pseudorapidities of the two l1 jets , and @xmath23 the pseudorapidity of the proton in the @xmath18 roman pots ) .
this trigger can hold without prescales to a luminosity up to 2.10@xmath24 @xmath25s@xmath26 , ( single diffraction , or double pomeron exchange ) for qcd studies : can be heavily prescaled , given by atlas with lepton triggers .
let us note that the rate will be of the order of 1 hz at l2 by adding a cut on a presence of a tag in the 420 pots , on timing , and also on the compatibility of the rapidity of the central object computed using the jets or the protons in roman pots .
& rp200 & @xmath16 & jet @xmath27 & bunch & rate @xmath28 $ ] & reduction & reduction & prop . & crossing & @xmath29 $ ] & factor & factor & @xmath30 & 0.35 & 2.6 & 120 & 300 & 1200 @xmath31 & 3.5 & 26 & 8.9 & 22 & 88 @xmath32 & 7 & 52 & 4.2 & 9.8 & 39.2 @xmath33 & 17.5 & 130 & 1.9 & 3.9 & 15.6 @xmath34 & 35 & 260 & 1.3 & 2.2 & 8.8 in this short report , we described the main aspects of the project to install roman pots at 220 m within atlas : silicon detectors , measurement of the proton timings , and the trigger properties .
this project is aimed to be proposed to atlas and the lhcc together with the fp420 one .
m. boonekamp , r. peschanski and c. royon , phys .
* b598 * ( 2004 ) 243 ; m. boonekamp , a. de roeck , r. peschanski and c. royon , phys
* b 550 * ( 2002 ) 93 ; v. a. khoze , a. d. martin and m. g. ryskin , eur .
j. * c23 * ( 2002 ) 311 , eur .
j. * c24 * ( 2002 ) 581 .
m. boonekamp , j. cammin , s. lavignac , r. peschanski and c. royon , phys . rev . *
d 73 * ( 2006 ) 115011 atlas note about rp220 project , to be submitted
|
motivation install roman pot detectors at 220 m atlas clear extends project measuring total cross sections at 240 m @xcite hard diffraction high luminosity complementary to fp420 project tagging protons at 420 m physics motivation corresponds domains diffraction understanding inclusive diffraction mechanism at lhc studying structure pomeron quarks gluons measurement exclusive production diffractive events @xcite cross section in jet channel jet transverse momentum necessary control background higgs signal higgs boson diffractive production in double pomeron exchange standard model extensions @xcite challenging topic low higgs boson masses higgs boson decays non - diffractive search possible strategy sensitivity to anomalous coupling photon measuring qed production cross section of @xmath1 boson pairs access anomalous coupling ilc photoproduction of jets topics stop events measuring top mass threshold scan method @xcite production cross section propose install roman pots atlas at 216 and 224 m main atlas detectors project collaboration between physics institutes universities prague cracow stony brook michigan state university lpnhe giessen university of chicago argonne national laboratory for timing detectorsroman pot design follows design used by totem collaboration luminosity group atlas collaboration measuring total cross section at 240 m difference need horizontal arms not vertical hard diffractive protons scattered horizontally follow totem experience build roman pots in vakuum praha use same technics for step motors lvdt system assuming down to 10 15 ) @xmath2 from beam center measure protons with @xmath3 @xmath4 on each side of atlas @xmath7 is momentum fraction of initial proton carried away by pomeron @xcite translated in missing mass acceptance in fig 1 using 220 m pots starts at 135 gev increases missing mass needs fp420 rp220 projects detect scattered protons at 220 420 m good acceptance on wide range of masses precision on mass reconstruction using two tags at 220 2 - 3 % on full mass range advantage measurement good mass resolution on wide range of masses detect higgs bosons at low masses decaying into @xmath0 enhance signal over background ratio good resolution suppression of @xmath8 jet background due to suppression rulepropose put inside roman pots two detectors silicon detectors measure position diffracted protons mass produced object higgs boson @xmath7 precise timing detectors position detectors five layers silicon strips 50 @xmath10 m two additional layers for triggering or 3d silicon detectors if available industrially roman pots silicon strip option chosen four orientations x y u v u v orientated within 45 degrees x y strip size 50 @xmath10 m detector size 2 cm measurement up to @xmath11 silicon strip detectors edgeless dead edge 30 - 50 @xmath10 m move detector close to beam without losing acceptance dead edge detectors read out by standard abcnext chip in cracow for silicon detector atlas latency time 3.5 @xmath10s time to send back local l1 decision from roman pots to atlas receive l1 decision from atlas distance about 440 m. modification abcnext chip to include trigger possibilities other option use 3d silicon detectors same readout system detectors use lateral electric field instead of verticalholes 10 @xmath10 m crossing thickness detector filled with conductive medium to collect ionisation electrons or holes depending bias options tested in prague saclay using full electronics chain including abcnext chip laser or radioactive source beam tests at desy or cern foreseen to install roman pot with silicon detectors during shut down lhc in 2009 - 2010 timing detectors necessary at highest luminosity to identify vertex protons expected 35 interactions at same bunch crossing identify protons precision few mm or 5 - 10 ps required to distinguish vertices diffracted protons from hard interactions picosecond timing detectors challenge developped between saclay stony brook university of chicago argonne national laboratory proton timings measured in crystal 2.5 cm inside roman pots signal read by micro - channel plates photomultipliers photonis space resolution few mm two protons detected for one bunch crossing at highest luminosity detectors read with constant fraction discriminator timing resolution first version ready in 2009 - 2010 resolution 40 - 50 ps final version by 2012 resolution 5 - 10 pssection principle of trigger using roman pots at 220 m rates simulation atlas detector trigger framework principle shown in fig . 2 higgs boson decaying into @xmath0 first level trigger from two silicon strip layers in each roman pot detector practical use two planes for triggering different signal thresholds for trigger readout idea send five strip addresses hit at level 1 local trigger defined at roman pot level each atlas experiment combining two trigger planes roman pot if hits compatible strip addresses sent to atlas @xmath7 each proton diffractive mass information combined with information central atlas detector requesting two jets above 40 gev at l2 information from timing detectors for each diffracted proton combined with position main vertex of atlas check for compatibility positive atlas trigger decision readout informations from roman pot detectors sent to atlas trigger on dpe events at 220 m easiest situation two protons requested at level 1 220 moptions trigger high mass higgs @xmath12 gev by atlas decay @xmath13 @xmath14 two high @xmath15 jets positive tags in roman pots high jets atlas low @xmath15 jet special trigger for qcd studies configuration l1 rate events triggered by atlas special diffractive triggers for qcd measurements highly prescaled trigger on dpe events at 220 420 m delicate scenario information from 420 m pots included at l1 strategy table higgs decaying in @xmath0 positive tag at 220 m with @xmath16 proton momentum fractional loss @xmath18 roman pot higgs mass smaller than @xmath19 topological cuts on jets exclusiveness process @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 pseudorapidities l1 jets @xmath23 pseudorapidity proton @xmath18 roman pots trigger hold without luminosity up to 2.10@xmath24 @xmath25s@xmath26 single diffraction double pomeron exchange for qcd studies heavily prescaled by atlas with lepton triggers rate 1 hz at l2 adding cut on tag in 420 pots timing compatibility rapidity central object jets protons roman potsrp200 @xmath16 jet @xmath27 bunch rate $ reduction prop crossing @xmath29 $ factor @xmath30 0.35 2.6 120 300 1200 @xmath31 3.5 26 8.9 22 88 @xmath32 7 52 4.2 9.8 39.2 @xmath33 17.5 130 1.9 3.9 15.6 35 260 1.3 2.2 8.8 short report project install roman pots 220 m atlas silicon detectors measurement proton timings trigger properties project proposed atlas lhcc fp420 boonekamp r. peschanski c. royon phys . b598 2004 ) 243 550 2002 ) 93 khoze d. martin g. ryskin eur j. c23 * 2002 ) 311 c24 * 2002 ) 581 boonekamp cammin lavignac peschanski c. royon phys 73 * 2006 ) 115011 atlas note rp220 project submitted
| 0.441047
| 3,001
| 1,543
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,906
|
we have used the wide field spectrograph on the australian national university 2.3-m telescope to perform the integral field spectroscopy for a sample of the galactic planetary nebulae .
the spatially resolved velocity distributions of the h@xmath0 emission line were used to determine the kinematic features and nebular orientations .
our findings show that some bulge planetary nebulae toward the galactic center have a particular orientation .
the majority of planetary nebulae ( pne ) show predominantly axisymmetric morphologies , i.e. elliptical and bipolar .
there is a strong argument in favor of the axisymmetric morphologies of pne being related to the angular momentum of their central engines ( e.g. , ( * ? ? ?
* miszalski et al . 2009 ) ; ( * ? ? ?
* nordhaus et al . 2010 ) ) .
recently , it has been found that the nebular inclinations are closely related to the orbital inclinations of their close - binary central stars ( see e.g. , ( * ? ? ?
* jones et al .
2012 ) ; ( * ? ? ?
* tyndall et al . 2012 ) ) .
pn as a test particle can be used to trace the dynamics of the galaxy .
the major axes of bipolar pne are assumed to be perfectly aligned with the angular momentum vectors of their central stars , so a population of bipolar galactic pne can be used to determine the angular momentum distribution of the local stars within the galaxy .
recent studies showed that some bipolar pne within the bulge near the galactic center have a homogeneous orientation ( ( * ? ? ? * weidmann & daz 2008 ) ; ( * ? ?
? * rees & zijlstra 2013 ) ) . ,
title="fig:",width=115 ] , title="fig:",width=115 ] , title="fig:",width=115 ] , title="fig:",width=115 ] , title="fig:",width=115 ] , title="fig:",width=432 ] in this study , we aim to disentangle 3d gaseous structures of some galactic pne by means of integral field spectroscopy .
we used the wide field spectrograph ( ( * ? ? ?
* wifes ; dopita et al .
2010 ) ) on the 2.3-m anu telescope at siding spring observatory .
wifes is an image - slicing integral field unit ( ifu ) feeding a double - beam spectrograph .
it has a field - of - view of @xmath1 and a spatial resolution of @xmath2 .
our observations were carried out with a spectral resolution of @xmath3 .
the spectra were reduced using the iraf pipeline wifes ( ( * ? ? ?
* described in detail by danehkar et al .
2013 ) ) .
we obtain the kinematic features by applying a gaussian curve fit to each spaxel of ifu datacube ( see fig .
[ fig1 ] ) .
the observed kinematic maps are then compared to 3-d kinematic models in order to find the orientations of the nebular symmetric axes onto the plane of the sky , i.e. the position angle ( pa ) measured from the north toward the east in the equatorial coordinate system ( ( * ? ? ?
* see danehkar et al .
2014 ) ) .
the pa is transferred into the galactic position angle ( gpa ) in the galactic coordinate system .
fig .
[ fig1 ] ( bottom ) shows orientations of the pne based on their symmetric axes projected onto the sky plane .
the spatial orientations of the galactic pne have been studied by few authors ( ( * ? ? ?
* phillips 1997 ) ; ( * ? ?
? * corradi et al . 1998 ) ; ( * ? ? ?
* weidmann & daz 2008 ) ; ( * ? ? ?
* rees & zijlstra 2013 ) ) .
although the orientations of nearby galactic pne are found to be completely arbitrary in the galactic disc , some distant pne seem to have a particular orientation within the galactic bulge , as seen in fig .
[ fig1 ] ( in agreement with ( * ? ? ?
* weidmann & daz 2008 ) ; ( * ? ? ? * rees & zijlstra 2013 ) ) .
galactic bulge pne are affected by the bugle dynamics and the supermassive black hole located at the galactic center , and are required to be observed and investigated further .
|
ad acknowledges travel grants from iau and australian institute of physics .
|
acknowledges travel grants australian institute
| 0.065009
| 14
| 8
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,911
|
a unique analytical solution of planet and star parameters can be derived from an extrasolar planet transit light curve under a number of assumptions .
this analytical solution can be used to choose the best planet transit candidates for radial velocity follow - up measurements , with or without a known spectral type . in practice , high photometric precision ( @xmath0 0.005 mag ) and high time sampling ( @xmath0 5 minutes ) are needed for this method .
see seager & malln - ornelas ( 2002 ) for full details .
# 1_#1 _ # 1_#1 _ = # 1 1.25 in .125 in .25 in # 1to 0pt#1
|
the following assumptions and conditions are necessary for a light curve to yield a unique solution of planet and star parameters : + @xmath1 the planet orbit is circular ( valid for tidally - circularized extrasolar planets ) ; + @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 and the companion is dark compared to the central star ; + @xmath1 the stellar mass - radius relation is known ; + @xmath1 the light comes from a single star , rather than from 2 or more blended stars ; + @xmath1 the eclipses have flat bottoms .
this implies that the companion is fully superimposed on the central star s disk and requires that the data is in a band pass where limb darkening is negligible ; + @xmath1 the period can be derived from the light curve ( e.g. , the two observed eclipses are consecutive ) .
+ in this article @xmath5 is mass , @xmath6 is radius , @xmath7 is density , @xmath8 is period , @xmath9 is orbital semi - major axis , @xmath10 is the orbital inclination , and @xmath11 is the gravitational constant . where required
the subscript @xmath12 is for planet , @xmath13 for stellar , and @xmath14 for solar .
five equations are used to uniquely solve for @xmath4 , @xmath15 , @xmath9 , @xmath10 , and @xmath16 .
the simplified equations presented below require the additional assumption that @xmath17 .
transit depth @xmath18 total transit duration @xmath19 transit shape ( @xmath20 flat part of transit and @xmath21 total transit duration ) @xmath22 kepler s third law @xmath23 stellar mass - radius relation @xmath24 here @xmath25 is a constant coefficient for each stellar sequence ( main sequence , giants , etc . ) and @xmath26 describes the power law of the sequence ( e.g. , @xmath27 and @xmath28 for f k main sequence stars ( cox 2000 ) ) . note that kepler s third law and the stellar mass - radius relation set a physical scale to two disks passing in front of each other .
this breaks the geometrical degeneracy and allows a unique solution .
the five parameters @xmath4 , @xmath15 , @xmath9 , @xmath10 , and @xmath16 can be solved for uniquely from the above five equations . moreover
, the impact parameter @xmath29 and stellar density @xmath30 can be solved for uniquely without the stellar mass - radius relation .
@xmath31^{1/2}.\ ] ] @xmath32 @xmath33^{\frac{1}{1 - 3x}}.\ ] ] @xmath34^{\frac{x}{(1 - 3x)}}.\ ] ] @xmath35^{1/3}.\ ] ] @xmath36 @xmath37^{\frac{x}{(1 - 3x ) } } \sqdepth.\ ] ]
the above analytical solution has many applications , all related to selecting the best transit candidates for radial velocity mass follow - up . here
we only have room to describe one application ; for others see seager & malln - ornelas ( 2002 ) .
the stellar density @xmath30 can be uniquely determined from the light curve alone without using the stellar mass - radius relation , as seen from equation ( 7 ) .
a measured @xmath30 can be used in three ways .
( 1 ) from the light curve alone a main sequence star and a giant star can be distinguished because main sequence stars occupy a unique position in a @xmath30 vs. spectral type diagram ( figure 1 ) .
hence a giant star with an eclipsing stellar companion can be ruled out .
( 2 ) from the light curve and the stellar mass - radius relation @xmath16 can be estimated ( equation ( 12 ) ) .
even for slightly evolved stars an upper limit on @xmath15 and hence @xmath16 can be derived .
( 3 ) a common false positive planet transit can be ruled out by comparing @xmath30 derived from the light curve with @xmath30 derived from a spectral type .
if the two @xmath30 differ then something is amiss with the assumptions in 1 .
the common case is the situation where a binary star system has its eclipse depth reduced to a planet - size eclipse due to the light from a third , contaminating , star ( figure 2 ) .
the contaminating star may be a chance alignment of a foreground or background star , or a third star as part of a triple star system . for a real example of this `` blended star '' situation , see malln - ornelas et al .
|
assumptions conditions necessary for light curve unique solution planet star parameters : @xmath1 planet orbit circular valid for circularized extrasolar planets companion dark compared to central star stellar mass - radius relation known light comes from single star 2 blended stars eclipses have flat bottoms implies companion superimposed on central star s disk requires data in band pass where limb darkening negligible period derived from light curve two eclipses consecutive @xmath5 is mass radius density period orbital semi - major axis orbital inclination gravitational constant subscript @xmath12 for planet @xmath13 for stellar @xmath14 for solar five equations to solve for @xmath4 @xmath15 @xmath9 @xmath16 simplified equations require additional assumption @xmath17 transit depth total transit duration transit shape flat part of transit total duration kepler s third law stellar mass - radius relation constant coefficient for each stellar sequence @xmath26 describes power law of sequence@xmath27 @xmath28 main sequence stars cox 2000 kepler s third law stellar mass - radius relation set physical scale two disks breaks geometrical degeneracy allows unique solution five parameters @xmath4 solved from equations impact parameter @xmath29 stellar density @xmath30 solved without stellar mass - radius relation @xmath31^{1/2} @xmath32 - 3x}} @xmath34 - 3x @xmath35{1/3} @xmath36 @xmath37 - 3x solution applications selecting best transit candidates radial velocity mass follow - up one application see seager & malln - ornelas ( 2002 stellar density @xmath30 determined from light curve without stellar mass - radius relation equation ( 7 ) measured @xmath30 used three ways light curve main sequence star giant star distinguished unique position @xmath30 spectral type diagram figure 1 giant star eclipsing stellar companion ruled out light curve stellar mass - radius relation @xmath16 estimated equation ( 12 )evolved stars upper limit @xmath15 @xmath16 derived false positive planet transit ruled out comparing @xmath30 light curve with spectral type @xmath30 differ amiss assumptions 1 common case binary star system eclipse depth reduced planet - size eclipse due light third contaminating star figure 2 contaminating star chance alignment foreground background third star triple star system example blended star situation see malln - ornelas et al .
| 0.179268
| 1,030
| 495
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,913
|
we have technically improved the non - perturbative renormalization method , proposed by martinelli et al . , by using quark momentum sources and sinks .
composite two - fermion operators up to three derivatives have been measured for wilson fermions and sheikholeslami - wohlert improved fermions in the quenched approximation .
the calculations are performed in the landau gauge on @xmath0 lattices at @xmath1 for @xmath2 @xmath3 values in each case .
the improved sources greatly decrease the statistical noise .
we extract and discuss here renormalization factors for local operators and moments of the structure functions for wilson fermions .
|
in this paper we want to discuss some general and technical aspects of calculating non - perturbatively renormalization factors of bilinear quark operators by imposing renormalization conditions on off - shell quark green s functions on the lattice @xcite .
this method offers the possibility of computing non - perturbative contributions and all orders of @xmath4 perturbation theory in a simple way in contrast to the enormous efforts to get only lower orders with perturbative methods .
the disadvantages of this numerical renormalization are the need of computer power and at present the systematic uncertainties due to a quenched approximation ( that excludes fermion loops ) , discretization errors @xcite and gauge fixing .
we look here at operators @xcite @xmath5 with quark fields @xmath6 and @xmath7 constructed out of dirac operators @xmath8 and covariant lattice derivatives @xmath9 . + desy 97 - 203 + hub - ep-97/72
the renormalization method we study is a @xmath10-scheme using the lattice as regulator with the lattice spacing @xmath11 as cut - off .
lattice operators @xmath12 and quark fields @xmath13 are renormalized being then only a function of the scale parameter @xmath14 , via : @xmath15 ( @xmath16 is the bare lattice coupling . ) to determine the renormalization constants @xmath17 one imposes conditions on amputated forward quark vertex functions in momentum space with external four - momenta @xmath18 : @xmath19 with a projector method , where @xmath20 $ ] is taken , @xmath21 being a colour@xmath22spin trace , these prescriptions give : @xmath23 } \nonumber \\ \qquad & = & tr [ \big .
\gamma_{\!\!\cal o } \langle q(p ) | { \cal o}(a ) | q(p ) \rangle^{tree}_{amp } ] \big|_{p^2=\mu^2 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] as an optimal choice for the projector , we use , written in a general form : @xmath24 there are two definitions for @xmath25 : usually one projects onto the energy - momentum part @xmath26 ( continuum form : @xmath27 ) of the inverse propagator @xmath28 and gets : + + ( the normalization is chosen to give @xmath29 in the free case . ) another definition for @xmath25 can be derived from eq .
( 1 ) , setting @xmath30 equal to the conserved vector current @xmath31 and using . but
this is only compatible to the first determination of @xmath25 , if the component of @xmath31 transverse to @xmath18 is taken .
( this can be proven by a ward identity assuming , which is true in the continuum and approximately true on the lattice for not too large @xmath32 . )
in a first step monte carlo gluon field configurations @xmath33 have to be generated and numerically fixed to the landau gauge @xcite . the lattice matrix elements in eq .
( 1 ) , non - amputated , can then be calculated in those background fields : @xmath34 ( @xmath35 , ... are space - time points on the lattice . )
the propagators @xmath36 can be computed from a lattice dirac equation with a momentum source , @xmath37 being the fermion matrix : @xmath38 so here the number of matrix inversions is proportional to the number of momenta . but everything else is then there : @xmath39 and the quark propagator @xmath40 with @xmath41 for an amputation and @xmath25 .
the momentum source method automatically performs all the site sums in eq .
another possibility , instead of summing over @xmath42 ( and @xmath43 ) , is to choose a particular location for the operator , for example setting @xmath44 .
translational invariance tells us that this will give the same expectation value after averaging over all configurations . for this method
we need to solve the dirac equation with a point source at @xmath45 and ( for extended operators where @xmath46 ) for a small number of sources in the region around @xmath42 : @xmath47 ( @xmath48 has simply to be fourier transformed to @xmath49 then and we have @xmath50 . ) for local operators and operators with a small number of derivatives the point source method would need fewer inversions , but we see from fig.1 . that relying on translational invariance to carry out the @xmath51 sums leads to much larger error bars
. = 8.00 cm [ fig1 ] = 8.00 cm [ fig2 ]
our calculations are performed on @xmath0 lattices at @xmath52 for hopping parameters @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath55 .
if the method works for current lattices , one expects to find a high enough @xmath56 region where the @xmath57 factors agree with , but are still not destroyed by discretisation effects .
however the available one - loop calculations probably need to be improved for @xmath58 . at low @xmath56 non - perturbative effects and
higher order perturbation theory may have a big influence as can be seen looking at the pseudo - scalar @xmath59 ( fig.2 ) : results for @xmath2 quark masses indicate a non - perturbative pion pole contribution in the chiral limit .
the @xmath57 factors for the operators of the moments of the structure functions , e.g. @xmath60 ( fig.3 ) , seem to show also big non - perturbative or higher order perturbation theory contributions at low @xmath56 .
o(a ) discretization errors are in general expected at higher @xmath56 . however , for the local vector current ( fig.3 ) such errors seem to be there at all scales : it is not constant as expected from its continuum behaviour . in the o(a ) improved theory @xcite it is . in a comparison with one - loop lattice perturbation theory ( dashed lines in figures )
@xcite : + @xmath61 , + @xmath62 and @xmath63 being the anomalous dimension , and with tadpole improved theory ( solid lines in figures ) @xcite we find that the improved theory fits better to the data . for the axial current ( fig.1 ) and the scalar operator ( fig.2 )
there is a good agreement .
we extract @xmath64 .
9 g. martinelli et al . , nucl .
b445 ( 1995 ) 81 .
p. rakow , this conference .
m. gckeler et al . , nucl .
53 ( 1997 ) 81
. m. l. paciello et al . , phys .
b276 ( 1992 ) 163 .
m. gckeler et al . ,
b ( proc . suppl . ) 53 ( 1997 ) 896 .
g. p. lepage and p. b. mackenzie , phys .
d48 ( 1993 ) 2250 .
|
paper calculating non - renormalization factors bilinear quark operators imposing conditions on off - shell quark functions lattice @xcite method computing non - perturbative contributions orders @xmath4 perturbation theory contrast lower orders perturbative methods disadvantages need computer power systematic uncertainties approximation discretization errors gauge fixing operators @xcite @xmath5 quark fields @xmath6 @xmath7 dirac operators @xmath8 covariant lattice derivatives @xmath9 renormalization method @xmath10-scheme lattice regulator lattice spacing @xmath11 cut - off lattice operators @xmath12 quark fields @xmath13 renormalized function scale parameter @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 lattice coupling determine renormalization constants @xmath17 imposes conditions on amputated forward quark vertex functions momentum space external four - momenta @xmath18 @xmath19 projector method @xmath20 @xmath21 colour@xmath22spin trace prescriptions @xmath23\gamma_{\cal o } \langle q(p ) o\rangle{tree}{amp } \big|{p^2=\mu^2 } \end{aligned} optimal choice projector use @xmath24 two definitions @xmath25 one projects energy - momentum part @xmath26 continuum form @xmath27 inverse propagator @xmath28 + normalization @xmath29 free case definition @xmath25 from eq . @xmath30 equal conserved vector current @xmath31 compatible first determination @xmath25 if component @xmath31 transverse to @xmath18 taken proven ward identity true continuum lattice @xmath32 first gluon field configurations @xmath33 generated fixed to landau gauge @xcite lattice matrix elements calculated background fields : @xmath34 @xmath35 space - time points lattice propagators @xmath36 computed from lattice dirac equation momentum source @xmath37 fermion matrix @xmath38 matrix inversions proportional to momenta @xmath39 quark propagator @xmath40 @xmath41 amputation @xmath25 momentum source method performs site sums in eq .possibility instead summing @xmath42 choose location for operator setting @xmath44 translational invariance same expectation value after averaging configurations solve dirac equation point source at @xmath45 extended operators @xmath46 small sources in region around @xmath42 @xmath47 @xmath48 transformed to @xmath49 @xmath50 local operators small derivatives point source method fewer inversions relying on translational invariance @xmath51 sums leads to larger error bars calculations performed on @xmath0 lattices at @xmath52 for hopping parameters @xmath53 @xmath55 method works for lattices expects high @xmath56 region where @xmath57 factors agree not destroyed by discretisation effects one - loop calculations need for @xmath58 low @xmath56 non - perturbative effects higher order perturbation theory influence pseudo - scalar @xmath59 results @xmath2 masses indicate non - perturbative pion pole contribution in chiral limit @xmath57 factors structure show big non - perturbative higher theory contributions at low @xmath56 discretization errors expected at higher @xmath56 local vector currenterrors all scales not constant continuum behaviour o(a ) improved theory @xcite comparison with one - loop lattice perturbation theory lines @xmath61 @xmath62 anomalous dimension tadpole improved theory fits better data axial current.1 scalar operator fig.2 good agreement extract @xmath64 martinelli et al . nucl . b445 ( 1995 ) 81 rakow conference gckeler et al . nucl . 53 ( 1997 ) 81 paciello et phys . b276 ( 1992 ) 163 gckeler 53 ( 1997 ) 896 lepage b. mackenzie phys . d48 ( 1993 ) 2250
| 0.262671
| 1,576
| 828
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,918
|
charmless @xmath0 decays are studied using flavor su(3 ) symmetry .
amplitude with charming penguin topology is considered for two cases : with zero and with arbitrary strong phase .
two sets of data ( an older and the most recent one ) are used in the fits , so that the stability of the fits is tested .
it is shown that within the present uncertainties in the data the parameters of the fit may be significantly modified , especially the @xmath1 angle .
the fits indicate the strong phase of the charming penguin amplitude to be around @xmath2 .
pacs numbers : 13.25.hw , 12.15.hh
|
@xmath3-meson decays are an excellent source of information about the ckm mechanism and allow us to test our understanding of the cp violation . in nonleptonic
@xmath3 decays we must deal with final states interactions ( fsi ) as well , since they may modify the values of the extracted parameters .
it is hard to take fsi into consideration properly since there are a lot of possible decay channels .
+ during the recent years several authors have investigated various possible corrections due to fsi .
most of the analyses take into account the elastic and inelastic effects arising from intermediate states containing light quarks ( @xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 ) [ 1 - 6 ] and apply symmetries of strong interactions ( isospin , su(3 ) ) to reduce the number of parameters .
some authors argued that intermediate states containing charmed quarks ( @xmath7 ) may also play an important role [ 7 - 13 ] .
+ in the present paper we analyse @xmath3 decays into two light noncharmed pseudoscalar mesons .
we consider fsi originating only from the intermediate states containing c quarks . in sections 2 and 3
we introduce our parametrisation and relations between the amplitudes .
section 4 contains the description of the fit procedure and our results together with the cp asymmetry predictions .
finally , a short summary is given in section 5 .
the decays of @xmath3 meson into two noncharmed pseudoscalar mesons are characterised by 10 @xmath8 invariant amplitudes corresponding to the specific quark - line diagrams . as in @xcite
we use four dominant amplitudes : tree @xmath9 , colour - suppressed @xmath10 , penguin @xmath11 and singlet penguin @xmath12 .
unprimed ( primed ) amplitudes denote strangeness conserving ( violating ) processes and are related to each other .
topological decompositions of decay amplitudes can be found in @xcite .
+ we use the wolfenstein parameters : @xmath13 , @xmath14 , @xmath15 and @xmath16 @xcite . all relations bellow
are calculated up to @xmath17 unless explicitly written otherwise .
terms proportional to @xmath18 are kept on account of complex factor in @xmath19 , which may interfere with fsi correction .
we assume that all short - distance ( sd ) strong phases are negligible . for the tree amplitude
we have @xmath20 where @xmath21 is the su(3 ) breaking factor .
both @xmath22 and @xmath23 amplitudes have a weak phase equal @xmath1 .
we assume that sd penguin amplitudes are dominated by @xmath24 quark contribution .
when terms of order @xmath25 are included , the strangeness violating penguin amplitude @xmath19 acquires a small weak phase .
thus , @xmath19 can be represented as a sum of two terms , the second one due to the @xmath17 correction : @xmath26 penguin amplitude @xmath27 has weak phase -@xmath28 .
we used in our fits the value of @xmath29 consistent with the world average .
the singlet penguin has the same phase as penguin @xmath30 : @xmath31 + finally , we accept relations between the tree and colour - suppressed amplitudes : @xmath32 @xmath33 where @xmath34 and @xmath35 .
the last equation includes electroweak penguin @xmath36 .
the ew penguin contribution @xmath37 was calculated ( see e.g. @xcite ) without @xmath25 corrections .
this fact should not affect the fits much since @xmath38 @xcite and the small correction in @xmath12 is practically invisible in the fits ( the only changes we observed were in the asymmetry for the @xmath39 decay channel ) .
it was argued [ 7 - 13 ] that the intermediate states composed of charmed mesons ( @xmath40 , etc . ) , generated from the @xmath41 tree amplitudes @xmath42 , may lead via rescattering to amplitudes of penguin topology with an internal @xmath7 quark ( the `` charming penguin '' ) .
our calculations are similar as in the case of long - distance @xmath4-type penguins @xcite . assuming su(3 ) symmetry
, we can redefine penguins : @xmath43 where @xmath44 is related to the size of the ld charming penguin and is a complex number in general . because we do not have information about @xmath44 ( or @xmath42 ) , it is convenient to introduce the following parametrisation : @xmath45 strong phase @xmath46 and size @xmath47 of the charming penguin are additional free parameters in our fits .
the weak phases are determined by the tree amplitudes @xmath48 and are either @xmath49 or 0 .
we can eliminate @xmath50 using the relation @xmath51 + short - distance charming penguin @xmath52 has the same weak phase as @xmath53 .
it can be included in a new redefined charming penguin @xmath54 with new effective size and strong phase .
we minimise function f defined as : @xmath55 where @xmath56 denote theoretical ( experimental ) cp - averaged branching fractions and @xmath57 is an experimental error for i - th decay channel .
the sum is over all 16 decay channels as in @xcite .
experimental branching ratios and their errors are listed in tables 1 and 2 .
the connection between the amplitudes and branching ratios was corrected in our calculations for the lifetime difference between @xmath58 and @xmath59 : @xmath60 + we considered two sets of data .
the first one was the same as in @xcite .
the second one was used in @xcite .
data in table 2 are more recent and differ from the previous ones in a couple of entries .
we performed fits in three general cases : 1 . without long - distance charming penguin contributions and with @xmath61 , @xmath62 , @xmath63 , @xmath1 treated as free parameters 2 . with long - distance charming penguins described by real @xmath64 as an additional parameter and @xmath65 , which is consistent with calculations done in @xcite but without any assumed connection between @xmath66 and @xmath67 3 . with long - distance charming penguins described by two additional free parameters : @xmath68 , @xmath64 .
.fits to the first set of data ( in units of @xmath69 ) [ cols="<,<,^,^,^,^ " , ] charming penguins with a nonvanishing strong phase may be a source of direct cp asymmetries .
the predicted values were calculated for the same points as in tables 1,2 .
the results are given in table 3 together with the averages from belle , babar and cleo experiments @xcite .
the main features are large asymmetries in the @xmath70 sector with relatively small asymmetries for the @xmath71 decays channels .
we are not able to predict the absolute signs of the asymmetries since we have two allowed signs of @xmath68 .
the asymmetry for @xmath72 is a pure @xmath25 effect and shows a potential influence of this correction .
our results permit to draw the following conclusions : 1 . even without the charming penguins the value of angle @xmath1 extracted from the fit depends on the details of data .
more recent data prefer the value of @xmath1 more in accordance with the expectations of the standard model .
2 . if we admit the non - zero value of the charming penguin ( with strong phase equal zero ) , the fitted values of @xmath1 may move toward the sm value by @xmath73 .
admitting strong phase of the charming penguin as a free parameter leads to a relatively flat function @xmath74 i.e. it allows a wide range of @xmath1 .
this means that there is probably too much freedom in the fits .
however , the fitted strong phase @xmath68 is relatively stable and close to @xmath2 .
gerard , j. weyers , _ eur .
phys . j. _ * c7 * , 1 ( 1999 ) .
p. enczykowski , _ acta phys . pol .
_ * b28 * , 1605 ( 1997 ) .
j. f. donoghue , e. golowich , a. petrov and j. m. soares , _ phys .
lett . _ * 77 * , 2178 ( 1996 ) .
p. enczykowski , _ phys .
* d63 * , 014016 ( 2001 ) .
p. enczykowski , _ acta phys .
_ * b33 * , 1833 ( 2002 ) .
p. ach and p. enczykowski , _ phys .
rev . _ * d66 * , 054011 ( 2002 ) .
a. j. buras , r. fleischer,_phys .
lett . _ * b341 * , 379 ( 1995 ) .
m. ciuchini , e. franco , g. martinelli and l. silvestrini , _ nucl .
_ * b501 * , 271 ( 1997 ) .
m. ciuchini , r. contino , e. franco , g. martinelli and l. silvestrini , _ nucl .
phys . _ * b512 * , 3 ( 1998 ) .
m. ciuchini , e. franco , g. martinelli , m. pierini and l. silvestrini , _ phys .
lett . _ * b515 * , 33 ( 2001 ) . c. isola , m.ladisa , g. nardulli ,
t. n. pham and p.santorelli , _ phys .
_ * d64 * , 014029 ( 2001 ) .
j. l. rosner , _ phys .
rev . _ * d64 * , 094002 ( 2001 ) .
gerard and c. smith , _ eur .
phys . j. _ * c30 * , 69 ( 2003 ) . c. w. chiang , j. l. posner , _ phys .
_ * d65 * , 074035 ( 2002 ) .
p. enczykowski,_phys .
lett . _ * b590 * , 63 ( 2004 ) . c. w. chiang , m. gronau , j. l. posner and d. a. suprun , _ phys .
rev . _ * d70 * , 034020 ( 2004 ) .
|
@xmath3-meson decays information ckm mechanism cp violation nonleptonic @xmath3 decays with final states interactions fsi modify values extracted parameters hard to fsi possible decay channels authors investigated corrections due to fsi analyses elastic inelastic effects from intermediate states light quarks apply symmetries strong interactions to reduce parameters intermediate states charmed quarks ( @xmath7 ) role present paper analyse @xmath3 decays into two light noncharmed pseudoscalar mesons consider fsi from intermediate states containing c quarks sections 2 3 parametrisation relations between amplitudes section 4 fit procedure results cp asymmetry predictions summary section 5 decays of @xmath3 meson into two noncharmed pseudoscalar mesons characterised by 10 @xmath8 invariant amplitudes specific quark - line diagrams four dominant amplitudes : tree @xmath9 colour - suppressed @xmath10 penguin @xmath11 singlet penguin @xmath12 unprimed amplitudes denote strangeness processes related topological decompositions of decay amplitudes in @xcite use wolfenstein parameters relations calculated to @xmath17 unless terms proportional to @xmath18 kept complex factor @xmath19 fsi correction short - distance strong phases negligible tree amplitude @xmath20 @xmath21 su(3 ) breaking factor @xmath22 amplitudes weak phase equal @xmath1 sd penguin amplitudes dominated by @xmath24 quark contribution terms order @xmath25 included violating penguin amplitude @xmath19 acquires small weak phase @xmath19 sum of two terms to @xmath17 correction @xmath26 penguin amplitude @xmath27 weak phase -@xmath28 value @xmath29 consistent world average singlet penguin same phase as @xmath30 @xmath31 accept relations between tree colour - suppressed amplitudes @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 includes electroweak penguin @xmath36 penguin contribution @xmath37 calculated without @xmath25 corrections affect fits @xmath38 small correction in @xmath12 invisible changes asymmetry @xmath39 decay channel argued intermediate states charmed mesonsfrom @xmath41 tree amplitudes @xmath42 penguin topology @xmath7 quark charming penguin calculations similar long - distance @xmath4-type penguins assuming su(3 symmetry redefine penguins @xmath43 @xmath44 related to size charming penguin complex information @xmath44 introduce parametrisation @xmath45 strong phase @xmath46 size @xmath47 charming penguin additional parameters weak phases determined by tree amplitudes @xmath48 @xmath49 or 0 eliminate @xmath50 relation @xmath51 + short - distance charming penguin @xmath52 same weak phase @xmath53 included new redefined charming penguin @xmath54 new size strong phase minimise function f @xmath55 @xmath56 theoretical cp - averaged branching fractions @xmath57 experimental error i - th decay channel sum over 16 decay channels experimental branching ratios errors in tables 1 2 connection between amplitudes branching ratios corrected lifetime difference between @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 considered two sets data data table 2 recent differ performed fits in three caseslong - distance charming penguin contributions @xmath61 @xmath1 free parameters long - distance charming penguins @xmath64 additional @xmath65 consistent with calculations @xcite connection between @xmath66 @xmath67 long - distance charming penguins free parameters @xmath68 @xmath64 first set data units @xmath69 charming penguins nonvanishing strong phase source direct cp asymmetries predicted values calculated same points tables 1,2 results table 3 averages from belle babar cleo experiments @xcite large asymmetries in @xmath70 sector small asymmetries @xmath71 decays channels predict absolute signs asymmetries two allowed signs of @xmath68 asymmetry @xmath72 @xmath25 effect potential influence correction results conclusions charming penguins value of angle @xmath1 depends on details data recent data prefer value @xmath1 standard model admit non - zero value charming penguin strong phase fitted values @xmath1 move toward sm value @xmath73 admitting strong phase penguin free parameter leads flat function @xmath74 wide range of @xmath1 too much freedom in fitsfitted phase @xmath68 stable close to @xmath2 gerard weyers phys. c7 * 1 ( 1999 ) enczykowski acta phys . b28 * 1605 ( 1997 ). donoghue golowich petrov soares . 77 * 2178 ( 1996 ) enczykowski phys d63 014016 ( 2001 ) enczykowski acta phys. b33 1833 ( 2002 ) ach enczykowski phys . rev d66 * 054011 ( 2002 ). buras fleischer_phys . lett b341 379 ( 1995 ) ciuchini franco martinelli silvestrini b501 271 ( 1997 ) ciuchini contino franco martinelli silvestrini phys b512 * 3 ( 1998 ) ciuchini franco martinelli pierini silvestrini phys . b515 *, 33 ( 2001 ) isola .ladisa nardulli pham p.santorelli phys d64 * 014029 ( 2001 ). rosner phys . rev d64 * 094002 ( 2001 )gerard smith. c30 69 ( 2003 ) w. chiang j. l. posner phys d65 074035 ( 2002 ) enczykowski. b590 63 ( 2004 ) w. chiang. gronau j l. posner a. suprun . rev d70 034020 ( 2004 )
| 0.348936
| 2,403
| 1,264
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,919
|
in this note , we calculate the leading term of the rational lift of the kontsevich integral , @xmath0 , introduced by garoufalidis and kricker , on the boundary of an embedded grope of class @xmath1 .
we observe that it lies in the subspace spanned by connected diagrams of euler degree @xmath2 and with a bead @xmath3 on a single edge .
this places severe algebraic restrictions on the sort of knots that can bound gropes , and in particular implies the two main results of the author s thesis @xcite , at least over the rationals . -
|
in @xcite , garoufalidis and kricker introduced a powerful invariant @xmath0 which is a lift of the kontsevich integral to a space spanned by trivalent graphs whose edges are colored by elements of @xmath4 $ ] , at least when the alexander polynomial vanishes . in this note
we calculate how @xmath0 behaves when evaluated on the boundary of a grope . a grope ( of class @xmath5 )
is a specific @xmath6-complex that topologically models an element of the @xmath5th term of the lower central series of a group .
it is formed by gluing together surfaces called _ stages . _
some examples are pictured in figure [ fig1 ] .
see @xcite and @xcite for details .
[ rational ] let @xmath7 be an embedded grope of class @xmath1 @xmath8 in @xmath9 which has one boundary component , is of class @xmath1 , and has surface stages of genus one .
let @xmath10 denote the unknot .
then * @xmath11 vanishes in euler degree below @xmath2 .
* @xmath12 is a sum of connected graphs where every edge but one is colored by @xmath13 $ ] , and the other edge is colored by @xmath3 .
, @xmath14 and @xmath15.,title="fig:",height=163 ] , @xmath14 and @xmath15.,title="fig:",height=163 ] , @xmath14 and @xmath15.,title="fig:",height=163 ] note that the knots in this theorem automatically have trivial alexander polynomial since they bound gropes of class exceeding three .
this will imply that the kontsevich integral of @xmath16 vanishes in degree @xmath17 and that @xmath18 where @xmath19 denotes the subspace of @xmath20 spanned by connected graphs with two hairs on a single edge .
moreover we will show every element of @xmath19 is realized for some @xmath7 . since one can easily show that @xmath21 using an @xmath22 weight system , we achieve the following results , at least when the ambient manifold is @xmath9 .
( these were both proven in @xcite with a lot more effort . )
[ vassiliev ] let @xmath7 be an embedded genus one grope of class @xmath1 in a homology @xmath23-sphere ( @xmath24 ) .
* rational - valued goussarov - vassiliev invariants of degree @xmath17 do not distinguish @xmath25 from the unknot @xmath10 .
* there exists a goussarov - vassiliev invariant , @xmath26 , of degree @xmath27 and a grope @xmath7 of class @xmath1 such that @xmath28 .
the case of arbitrary homology spheres follows easily from the @xmath9 case , as we show at the end of the paper .
we conclude by emphasizing the fact that this note deals with knots that bound gropes , which is a more restricted class than those cobounding a grope with the unknot , as studied in @xcite .
we briefly review some properties of @xmath0 here .
this is distilled from @xcite , which is further distilled from @xcite .
we restrict to the case of knots with trivial alexander polynomial , since knots which bound gropes of class @xmath29 have that property .
let @xmath30 $ ] .
then a @xmath31-colored graph is a trivalent graph together with a map @xmath32 .
( a coloring of an edge is sometimes called a bead . )
then @xmath33 is a vector space generated by @xmath31-colored graphs , modulo certain relations .
this space is graded by the euler degree which is the number of vertices of the graph .
letting @xmath41 be the degree @xmath1 part of @xmath0 , we will use the fact that @xmath41 is a universal @xmath42-valued finite type invariant of null degree @xmath1 .
that is , it is universal with respect to null clasper surgeries , which are clasper surgeries whose leaves link the knot trivially .
so @xmath0 vanishes on alternating sums of surgeries of null claspers of total degree @xmath43 , and its value on alternating sums of null - claspers of total degree @xmath1 is given by the so - called _ complete contraction _ , defined by gluing the leaves together using the equivariant linking number , and coloring an edge by a @xmath35 or @xmath44 every time it passes through a fixed seifert surface .
the equivariant linking number of two leaves which are meridians to dual bands of a seifert surface is @xmath3 .
more generally , suppose that one leaf is a meridian to a band of a seifert surface and another leaf links only the dual band with linking number @xmath45
. then the equivariant linking number of these two leaves is @xmath46 . on the other hand ,
the equivariant linking number of leaves which are null homotopic in the complement of a seifert surface is just the standard linking number .
suppose a knot bounds an embedded grope of class @xmath1 in @xmath9 , where all the surface stages are of genus one
. then the knot can be represented as a rooted tree clasper surgery , @xmath47 , in the complement of the unknot which forms a meridian to the root leaf @xcite .
note that the other leaves can be embedded arbitrarily in the complement of the unknot s spanning disk .
break @xmath47 into a union of a @xmath48 at its root and a clasper @xmath49 which sits on the unknot @xmath50 .
then @xmath49 is a null clasper of euler degree @xmath2 .
the complete contraction @xmath51 is defined by thinking of @xmath49 as a unitrivalent tree and gluing up its leaves using the equivariant linking form .
one of the two dual bands of @xmath50 has exactly one leaf of @xmath49 as a meridian .
( because the grope is of class exceeding @xmath6 . )
the equivariant linking number of this leaf with any leaf that links the dual band is an integral multiple of @xmath3 . for every other pair of leaves
the equivariant linking numbers are integers .
thus @xmath52 is a sum of trivalent graphs of euler degree @xmath2 which have a bead @xmath3 on a single edge . by the universality of @xmath0
, we have that @xmath53 , and that @xmath54 note that any terms of @xmath0 of euler degree exceeding @xmath2 must have at least two hairs and so be of vassiliev degree exceeding @xmath27 .
thus there are no terms with vassiliev degree less than or equal to @xmath59 , and @xmath60 .
observe that @xmath61 as claimed . to see that every element of @xmath19 is realized ,
take a generator @xmath62 .
remove one of the two hairs and embed @xmath63 as a rooted clasper on the unknot . breaking some edges of @xmath63 into hopf pairs of leaves
we get a rooted clasper with @xmath1 leaves as desired .
this can be detected using an @xmath22 weight system ( * ? ? ?
* appendix ) .
this weight system satisfies two relations .
any closed loop gives a multiplicative factor of @xmath23 , whereas an edge can be expanded into a difference of two terms , where the edge is removed and replaced either by two parallel edges , or by two edges which cross . which consists of an ellipse with @xmath64 parallel vertical edges and two hairs .
we show it is nonzero by showing that the diagram formed by joining the two univalent vertices is nonzero .
the resulting diagram is an ellipse with @xmath59 parallel edges added .
applying the @xmath22 relations to these @xmath59 edges , starting from the right , we get down to @xmath65 , where @xmath66 is a single circle . hence our diagram evaluates to @xmath67 .
we have already established theorem 1 for knots in @xmath9 .
any homology sphere , @xmath68 , can be obtained from @xmath9 by surgery on a disjoint union of @xmath48 claspers . by general position
, we may assume that the clasper @xmath47 corresponding to our grope is disjoint from these claspers .
letting @xmath49 denote the clasper formed by surgering the unknot along the @xmath48 containing the root , we see that modulo euler degree @xmath43 we can pull @xmath49 into a ball
. then @xmath0 decomposes as a product of @xmath69 and @xmath70 , which easily implies theorem 1 .
999 , _ a knot bounding a grope of class @xmath59 is @xmath71-trivial _ , ph.d .
thesis , uc san diego 2000 , _ grope cobordism of classical knots _ , topology , vol .
43 , issue 1 ( 2004 ) ; 119 - 156 , _ a rational noncommutative invariant of boundary links _ ,
( 2004 ) 115 - 204 , _ on knots with trivial alexander polynomial _ , to appear in j. diff .
geom . , _ what is ... a grope ? _ , notices of the amer .
51 , no . 8 , ( 2004 ) , _ wheeling : a diagrammatic analogue of the duflo isomorphism _ ,
d thesis 2000 , uc berkeley
|
@xcite garoufalidis kricker introduced invariant @xmath0 lift kontsevich integral to space spanned trivalent graphs edges colored by elements @xmath4 alexander polynomial vanishes calculate @xmath0 boundary grope grope @xmath5 @xmath6-complex models element @xmath5th term lower central series formed by gluing together surfaces stages examples figure see @xcite details @xmath7 embedded grope @xmath1 @xmath8 @xmath9 one boundary component class @xmath1 surface stages genus one @xmath10 denote unknot @xmath11 vanishes euler degree below @xmath2 @xmath12 sum of connected graphs every edge colored by @xmath13 other edge colored by @xmath3 @xmath14 @xmath15 knots theorem have trivial alexander polynomial bound gropes class exceeding three kontsevich integral @xmath16 vanishes in degree @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 denotes subspace @xmath20 spanned connected graphs two hairs single edgeshow element @xmath19 realized @xmath7 show @xmath21 using @xmath22 weight system achieve results ambient manifold @xmath9 proven in @xcite vassiliev @xmath7 embedded genus grope class @xmath1 homology @xmath23-sphere @xmath24 ) rational goussarov - vassiliev invariants @xmath17 distinguish @xmath25 from unknot @xmath10 goussarov - vassiliev invariant @xmath26 degree @xmath27 grope @xmath7 class @xmath1 @xmath28 case arbitrary homology spheres follows @xmath9 case end paper note deals with knots bound gropes more restricted class than cobounding grope unknot studied @xcite review properties @xmath0 distilled from @xcite restrict knots with trivial alexander polynomial knots bound gropes @xmath29 property @xmath30 $ @xmath31-colored graph trivalent graph map @xmath32 coloring edge called bead @xmath33 vector space generated @xmath31-colored graphs relations space graded by euler degree number vertices graph@xmath41 part of @xmath0 universal @xmath42-valued invariant of null degree @xmath1 universal null clasper surgeries leaves link knot trivially @xmath0 vanishes on surgeries null claspers @xmath43 value on null - claspers @xmath1 given by complete contraction gluing leaves together equivariant linking number coloring edge by @xmath35 or @xmath44 seifert surface equivariant linking number of two leaves meridians to dual bands seifert surface is @xmath3 one leaf meridian to band another links dual band @xmath45 equivariant linking number @xmath46 equivariant linking number of leaves null homotopic in surface standard linking number knot bounds grope @xmath1 in @xmath9 surface stages genus one knot represented as rooted tree clasper surgery @xmath47 in complement unknot meridian to root leaf other leaves embedded arbitrarily in break @xmath47 into union @xmath48 at root clasper @xmath49 unknot @xmath50 @xmath49 is null clasper of euler degree @xmath2 contraction @xmath51 defined @xmath49 unitrivalent tree leaves equivariant linking form dual bands @xmath50 has one leaf @xmath49 meridian grope class exceeding @xmath6 equivariant linking number leaf integral multiple of @xmath3 numbers integers @xmath52 sum of trivalent graphs euler degree @xmath2 bead @xmath3 on single edge universality of @xmath0 @xmath53 @xmath54 terms @xmath0 exceeding @xmath2 must have two hairs vassiliev degree exceeding @xmath27 no terms with vassiliev degree less than or equal to @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 claimed @xmath19 take generator @xmath62 remove hairs embed @xmath63 as rooted clasper on unknot breaking edges @xmath63 into pairs rooted clasper with @xmath1 leaves detected using @xmath22 weight system appendix satisfies two relations closed loop gives multiplicative factor of @xmath23 edge expanded into difference of two terms replaced by two parallel edges or ellipse with @xmath64 parallel vertical edges two hairs diagram joining two univalent vertices nonzerodiagram ellipse @xmath59 edges @xmath22 relations @xmath59 edges right to @xmath65 @xmath66 single circle diagram evaluates to @xmath67 established theorem 1 for knots in @xmath9 homology sphere @xmath68 obtained from @xmath9 surgery disjoint @xmath48 claspers clasper @xmath47 grope disjoint claspers @xmath49 clasper surgering unknot @xmath48 modulo euler degree @xmath43 @xmath49 into ball @xmath0 decomposes product of @xmath69 and @xmath70 implies theorem 1 knot bounding grope @xmath59 @xmath71-trivial ph.d thesis uc san diego 2000 grope cobordism of classical knots topology vol 43 1 2004 119 - 156 rational noncommutative invariant of boundary links 2004 115 - 204 knots trivial alexander polynomial grope notices 51 8 2004 wheeling diagrammatic analogue duflo isomorphism thesis 2000 uc berkeley
| 0.314793
| 2,137
| 1,155
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,921
|
the production of baryons containing two charmed quarks @xmath0 in hadronic interactions at high energies and large transverse momenta is considered .
it is supposed , that @xmath1-baryon is formed during a non - perturbative fragmentation of the @xmath2-diquark , which was produced in the hard process of @xmath3-quark scattering from the colliding protons : @xmath4 . it is shown that such mechanism enhances the expected doubly charmed baryon production cross section on tevatron and lhc colliders approximately 2 times in contrast to predictions , obtained in the model of gluon - gluon production of @xmath2-diquarks in the leading order of perturbative qcd .
* hadronic production of doubly charmed + baryons via charm excitation in proton * d.a .
g@xmath5nter and v.a.saleev _ samara state university , samara , russia _
|
doubly heavy baryons take the special place among baryons which contain heavy quarks .
the existence of two heavy quarks causes the brightly expressed quark - diquark structure of the @xmath1 baryon , in a wave function which one s the configuration with compact heavy @xmath6-diquark dominates .
regularity in a spectrum of mass of doubly heavy baryons appear in many respects to a similar case of mesons containing one heavy quark @xcite .
production mechanisms for @xmath7-baryons and @xmath8-mesons also have common features . at the first stage compact heavy @xmath6-diquark
is formed , than it fragments in a final @xmath7-baryon , picking up a light quark .
the calculations of production cross sections for doubly heavy baryons in @xmath9- and @xmath10-interactions were made recently as in the model of a hard fragmentation of a heavy quark in doubly heavy diquark @xcite as within the framework of the model of precise calculation of cross section of a gluon
gluon fusion into doubly heavy diquarks and two heavy antiquarks in the leading order of the perturbation theory of qcd @xcite .
mechanism of production of hadrons containing charmed quarks , based on consideration of hard parton subprocesses with one @xmath3-quark in an initial state , was discussed earlier in papers @xcite .
it was shown , that in the region of a large transferred momentum @xmath11 , where @xmath12 is charmed quark mass ) the concept of a charm excitation in a hadron does not contradict parton model and allows to effectively take into account the contribution of the high orders of the perturbative qcd theory to the born approximation . however , there is open problem of the `` double score '' , which is determined by the fact that the part of the born diagrams of birth of two heavy quarks in a gluon - gluon fusion can be interpreted , as the diagrams with charm excitation in one of initial protons .
these diagrams give leading in @xmath13 contribution in the @xmath3-quark perturbative , so - called point - like structure function ( sf ) of a proton .
as to the non - perturbative contribution in @xmath14quark sf of a proton @xcite it does not depend from @xmath15 and becomes very small at @xmath16 .
for example , fig .
1 shows one of 36 born diagrams , which have order @xmath17 , describing production of the @xmath2-diquark in the gluon - gluon fusion subprocess .
the experience in calculation of heavy quark production cross sections in a gluon - gluon fusion demonstrates that the contribution of the next order of the perturbative qcd in @xmath18 can be comparable with the contribution of the born diagrams . in the case of gluon gluon production of the two pairs of heavy quarks there will be more than three hundred diagrams with additional gluon in the final state , which have order @xmath19 , and their direct calculation is now considered difficultly feasible .
in this paper the model of @xmath2-diquark production in proton - proton interactions , based on the mechanism of the charm excitation in a proton is considered .
it is supposed , that the @xmath2-diquark is formed during scattering of @xmath3-quarks from colliding protons with radiation of a hard gluon , i.e. in the parton subprocess : @xmath21 the feynman diagrams of the parton subprocess ( 1 ) are shown in fig .
2 , where @xmath22 and @xmath23 are 4-momenta of the initial @xmath3-quarks , @xmath24 is 4-momentum of the final gluon , @xmath25 is 4-momentum of the diquark , which one is divided equally between the final @xmath3-quarks .
the doubly heavy diquark is considered as bound state of two @xmath3-quarks in the antitriplet colour state and in the vector spin state .
if @xmath26 and @xmath27 are colour indexes of initial quarks , and @xmath28 is colour index of a final diquark , the amplitude of production of the @xmath2-diquark @xmath29 is connected with the amplitude of production of two @xmath3-quarks with 4-momenta @xmath30 as follows : @xmath31 where @xmath32 , @xmath33 is the diquark mass , @xmath34 is the diquark wave function in zero point , @xmath35 is the colour part of a diquark wave function . considering spin degrees of freedom of @xmath14quarks and @xmath2-diquark ,
we have following conformity between amplitudes of birth of free quarks and a diquark with fixed spin projections ( without colour indexes and common factor @xmath36 ) : @xmath37.\end{aligned}\ ] ] because the wave function of the @xmath2-diquark is antisymmetric on colour index and symmetric on remaining indexes , the production of the scalar @xmath2-diquark is forbidden , i.e. @xmath38 amplitudes adequate to the diagrams in fig .
2 , where the final c - quarks are in the arbitrary spin states , are written out below , without the colour factors and the common factor @xmath36 : @xmath39 where @xmath40 , @xmath13 is strong coupling constant , @xmath41 .
let s remark , that the amplitudes @xmath42 are received by replacement of the initial quarks momenta @xmath43 in the amplitudes @xmath44 ans are taken with a minus sign , that allows for the antisymmetrization of the initial state of two identical @xmath3-quarks .
the corresponding colour factors are presented by the following expressions : @xmath45 using known property of a completely antisymmetric tensor of the third rank @xmath46 it is easy to find products of the colour factors @xmath47 , which ones are presented in the appendix a. the method of the calculation of a production amplitude of a bound nonrelativistic state of quarks in the fixed spin state is based on a formalism of the projection operator @xcite .
using properties of the charge conjugation matrix @xmath48 , we can link a scattering amplitude of a quark on a quark with a scattering amplitude of an antiquark on a quark , for example : @xmath49 as it may be shown , at @xmath50 one has : @xmath51 \sim \hat\varepsilon ( p , s_z=0)(\hat p+m_{cc}),\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath52 is polarization 4-vector of a spin-1 particle . after following effective replacements @xmath53 where @xmath54 and @xmath55 , amplitudes @xmath56 , with corresponding colour factors @xmath57 , describe production of the @xmath2-diquark with fixed polarization .
the square of the module of amplitude of @xmath2-diquark production after average on spin and colour degrees of freedom is given by the following expression : @xmath58 where in the amplitudes @xmath56 we have put @xmath59 . the summation on vector diquark polarizations in the square of the amplitude of the process ( 1 )
was done using the standard formula : @xmath60 the calculation of the value @xmath61 have been executed using the package of an analytical calculations feyncalc @xcite .
the answer is shown in the appendix b , as a function of standard mandelstam variables @xmath62 and @xmath63 .
in the parton model the cross section of a @xmath2-diquark production in @xmath10-interactions is represented as follows : @xmath64 where @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 is the @xmath3-quark distribution function in a proton at @xmath68 , @xmath69 is the diquark transverse momentum , @xmath70 is the rapidity of the diquark in c.m.f . of colliding protons ,
@xmath71 it is supposed that spin-@xmath72 and spin-@xmath73 @xmath74baryons relative yield is @xmath75 as it is predicted by the simple counting rule for the spin states .
the production cross section of @xmath1-baryons plus @xmath76baryons in our approach is connected with the production cross section of @xmath2-diquark within the framework of a model of a non - perturbative fragmentation as follows : @xmath77 where @xmath78 is the phenomenological function of a fragmentation , normalized approximately on unity , as a total probability of transition @xmath2-diquark in final doubly charmed baryon . at @xmath79 the fragmentation function
is selected in the standard form @xcite : @xmath80 where @xmath81 is the @xmath1-baryon mass , @xmath82 is the light quark mass , @xmath83 the is rate - fixing constant .
the fragmentation function for @xmath84 can be determined by the solving the dglap evolution equation @xcite .
following to paper @xcite , at numerical calculations we have used following values of parameters : @xmath85 gev , @xmath86 , @xmath87 gev@xmath88 , @xmath89 gev . for a @xmath14quark distribution function in a proton @xmath90
the parametrization cteq5 @xcite was used . in figures 3 and 4 at @xmath91
tev and @xmath92 tev , accordingly , the curves show results of our calculations of @xmath69-spectra latexmath:[$(|y the calculations from paper @xcite , adequate to the contribution of the gluon - gluon fusion production of @xmath1-baryons in a born approximation .
thus , our calculations demonstrate , that the observed production cross section of @xmath1-baryons on colliders tevatron and lhc can be approximately 2 times more at the expense of the contribution of the parton subprocess @xmath94 , than it was predicted earlier in the papers @xcite .
99 , prog.theor.phys.*82 * , 760 ( 1989 ) . , z.phys .
* c64 * , 57 ( 1994 ) .
, phys.lett . *
b332 * , 411 ( 1994 ) . , z.phys.*c76 * , 111 ( 1997 ) .
, phys.rev . *
d49 * , 555 ( 1994 ) .
, phys.lett . *
b385 * , 297 ( 1996 ) .
, phys.lett . , * b426 * , 384 ( 1998 ) . , yad.fiz .
* 59 * , 909 ( 1996 ) .
, phys.rev . *
d54 * , 3228 ( 1996 ) .
, phys.rev . *
d57 * , 4385 ( 1998 ) .
, mod.phys.lett . *
a9 * , 1083 ( 1994 ) .
, phys.lett .
* b343 * , 381 ( 1995 ) . , phys.rev . *
d56 * , 3046 ( 1997 ) .
, nucl.phys . * 478 * , 311 ( 1996 ) .
phys . , * b174 * , 317 ( 1980 ) . , the feyncalc book , mertig research and consulting , 1999 .
, phys.rev . *
d27 * , 105 ( 1983 ) .
, sov.j.nucl.phys . * 15 * , 438 ( 1972 ) ; _ yu.a .
dokshitser _ , sov.phys.jetp , * 46 * , 641 ( 1977 ) ; _ g. altarelli and g.parisi_ , nucl.phys .
, * b126 * , 298 ( 1977 ) . , ( cteq coll . ) , preprint hep - ph 9903282 . cross section of @xmath1-baryon production at @xmath99 tev and @xmath100
. stars ( * ) show the results of calculation from paper [ 10 ] , curve is our result obtained in the model of a charm excitation in colliding protons . cross section of @xmath1-baryon production at @xmath101 tev and @xmath100 . stars ( * ) show the results of calculation from paper [ 10 ] , curve is our result obtained in the model of a charm excitation in colliding protons .
|
doubly heavy baryons heavy quarks two heavy quarks quark - diquark structure @xmath1 baryon wave function compact heavy @xmath6-diquark regularity in spectrum mass doubly heavy baryons mesons one heavy quark production mechanisms for @xmath7-baryons @xmath8-mesons common features first stage compact heavy @xmath6-diquark formed fragments in final @xmath7-baryon light quark calculations production cross sections for doubly heavy baryons in @xmath9- @xmath10-interactions model hard fragmentation heavy quark doubly heavy diquark calculation cross section gluon gluon fusion into doubly heavy diquarks two heavy antiquarks perturbation theory qcd mechanism production of hadrons charmed quarks parton subprocesses one @xmath3-quark discussed large transferred momentum @xmath11 @xmath12 charmed quark mass charm excitation in hadron contradict parton model contribution high orders perturbative qcd theory to born approximation open problem of double score '' born diagrams birth of two heavy quarks in gluon - gluon fusion interpreted charm excitation initialdiagrams @xmath13 contribution @xmath3-quark point - structure function proton non - perturbative contribution @xmath14quark sf proton depend @xmath15 small at @xmath16 fig . 1 shows 36 born diagrams order @xmath17 @xmath2-diquark gluon - gluon fusion subprocess heavy quark production gluon - gluon fusion contribution perturbative qcd @xmath18 comparable born diagrams gluon gluon production two pairs heavy quarks more three hundred diagrams additional gluon final state order @xmath19 direct calculation difficultly feasible model @xmath2-diquark production proton - proton interactions charm excitation proton @xmath2-diquark formed during scattering @xmath3-quarks colliding protons hard gluon parton subprocess feynman diagrams shown fig . 2 @xmath22 @xmath23 4-momenta initial @xmath3-quarks @xmath24 4-momentum final gluon @xmath25 4-momentum diquark divided equally final @xmath3-quarks doubly heavy diquark bound state two @xmath3-quarks antitriplet colour state vector spin state@xmath26 colour indexes initial quarks colour final diquark amplitude production @xmath2-diquark @xmath29 connected with @xmath3-quarks 4-momenta @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 diquark mass diquark wave function zero point colour part function spin degrees freedom @xmath14quarks @xmath2-diquark conformity between amplitudes birth free quarks diquark fixed spin projections without colour indexes common factor @xmath36 @xmath37 wave function @xmath2-diquark antisymmetric on colour index symmetric remaining indexes production scalar @xmath2-diquark forbidden @xmath38 amplitudes diagrams fig . 2 final c - quarks arbitrary spin states without colour factors common factor @xmath36 @xmath39 strong coupling constant amplitudes @xmath42 received by replacement initial quarks @xmath43 amplitudes @xmath44 taken minus sign antisymmetrization initial state two identical @xmath3-quarks colour factors presented expressions @xmath45 antisymmetric tensor third rank @xmath46 find products colour factors @xmath47 appendix a.calculation production amplitude state quarks fixed spin state based formalism projection operator @xcite properties charge conjugation matrix @xmath48 link scattering amplitude quark with antiquark example @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 polarization 4-vector spin-1 particle replacements @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 amplitudes @xmath56 colour factors @xmath57 describe production @xmath2-diquark with fixed polarization square module amplitude @xmath2-diquark production after average spin colour degrees freedom given expression @xmath58 amplitudes @xmath56 @xmath59 summation vector diquark polarizations square amplitude standard formula @xmath60 calculation value @xmath61 executed analytical calculations feyncalc @xcite answer shown appendix b function of standard mandelstam variables @xmath62 and @xmath63 model cross section @xmath2-diquark production in @xmath10-interactions represented @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath3-quark distribution function proton @xmath68 @xmath69 diquark transverse momentum @xmath70 rapidity diquark c.m.fcolliding protons @xmath71 spin- @xmath74baryons yield is @xmath75 predicted counting rule spin states production cross section @xmath1-baryons @xmath76baryons connected with @xmath2-diquark non - perturbative fragmentation @xmath77 @xmath78 phenomenological function fragmentation normalized unity total probability transition @xmath2-diquark baryon @xmath79 fragmentation function selected standard form @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath1-baryon mass light quark mass @xmath83 rate - fixing constant fragmentation function @xmath84 determined solving dglap evolution equation numerical calculations used parameters @xmath85 gev @xmath86 @xmath87 gev gev @xmath14quark distribution function proton @xmath90 parametrization cteq5 @xcite used figures 3 4 @xmath91 @xmath92 tev curves show calculations @xmath69-spectra latexmath gluon - gluon fusion production @xmath1-baryonscalculations demonstrate production cross section @xmath1-baryons colliders tevatron lhc 2 times more expense contribution parton subprocess @xmath94 predicted papers prog.theor.phys.*82 760 ( 1989 ) z.phys c64 57 ( 1994 ).lett b332 411 ( 1994 )*c76 111 ( 1997 ).rev d49 555 ( 1994 ) b385 297 ( 1996 ) b426 384 ( 1998 ).fiz 59 909 ( 1996 ).rev d54 3228 ( 1996 ) d57 4385 ( 1998 ) mod.phys.lett a9 1083 ( 1994 ) b343 381 ( 1995 ).rev d56 3046 ( 1997 ) nucl.phys 478 311 ( 1996 ) b174 317 ( 1980 ) feyncalc book mertig research consulting 1999 phys.rev d27 105 ( 1983 ) sov.j.nucl.phys 15 438 ( 1972 ) sov.phys.jetp 46 641 ( 1977 ) altarelliparisi nucl.phys b126 298 1977 ) cteq coll preprint hep - ph 9903282 cross section @xmath1-baryon production @xmath99 tev @xmath100 stars results calculation paper 10 curve result charm excitation colliding protons cross section @xmath1-baryon @xmath101 @xmath100 stars * results calculation paper 10 curve result charm excitation colliding protons
| 0.430399
| 2,811
| 1,553
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,932
|
the study of transverse - momentum spectra of quarks and gluons produced by the color electric flux tube decaying through the schwinger tunneling mechanism is reviewed .
the hints for a fast hydrodynamization in the ultra - relativistic heavy - ion collisions are found .
|
it is now more than decade that the properties of the new state of matter called quark - gluon plasma ( qgp ) are studied with the ultra - relativistic heavy - ion collisions at rhic and the lhc . among many expected results
there are also a few outstanding surprises .
in particular , broad analysis of the particle correlations @xcite in the experimental data revealed that , in contrast to the earlier expectations based on the asymptotic freedom property of quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) , the qgp is a strongly coupled system with the lowest viscosity in nature .
moreover , it is surprisingly well described within the effective framework of relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics .
unfortunately , predictive power of the latter , required for the ongoing precision studies , is highly limited due to the requirement of the precise knowledge of its initial conditions .
in particular , one has only qualitative information on the amplitude of the viscous corrections just after the collision , which , apart from resulting in possible quantitative differences in the predicted results , may question applicability of the viscous fluid dynamics in such modelling in general @xcite .
thus , the study of the approach of the created qgp toward the local thermal equilibrium ( _ thermalization _ ) is nowadays of highest interest for the field of heavy - ion physics @xcite . in this proceedings contribution
we briefly review our main results of the study of the qgp thermalization rate within the framework of the color - flux - tube model proposed in ref .
@xcite . based on the detailed analysis of the transverse - momentum spectra of the produced partons
@xcite we show that it is difficult to fully thermalize the system within a short time ( @xmath0 fm ) unless the shear viscosity to entropy density ratio is that of ads / cft lower bound , @xmath1 @xcite .
however , at the same time , for @xmath2 the observed deviations from equilibrium state are quite well described within dissipative corrections of viscous hydrodynamics .
the latter observation confirms the fast hydrodynamization of the qgp first proposed in ref .
based on the saturation physics @xcite , due to the ultra - relativistic energies , most of particles produced in midrapidity of heavy - ion collisions originate from the decay of purely longitudinal color fields spanned by the receding color - charged nuclei . in refs . @xcite it was proposed to describe this physics situation within the simplified model of initial color electric flux tube @xcite treated in the abelian dominance approximation @xcite which subsequently decays into quarks and gluons according to the schwinger tunneling mechanism @xcite . within this
framework phase - space densities of quarks , antiquarks and charged gluons are described by the following kinetic boltzmann - vlasov - type equations @xmath3 respectively . in eqs .
( [ kineaq ] ) partons couple to the mean color field @xmath4 through the charges @xmath5 ( for quarks ) , @xmath6 ( for antiquarks ) , and @xmath7 ( for gluons ) @xcite , where the color indices @xmath8 run from 1 to 3 .
the first terms on the right hand side of eqs .
( [ kineaq ] ) denote the particle production due to the schwinger tunnelling @xcite .
in addition to the usual treatment we include the subsequent collisions between produced particles through the collisional kernels treated in the relaxation time approximation ( rta ) @xcite @xmath9 where the relaxation time is expressed according to the anderson - witting formula @xmath10 @xcite . in the case of boost - invariant and transversely homogeneous system , also called the bjorken symmetry @xcite , the solutions of eqs .
( [ kineaq ] ) depend only on the proper time , @xmath11 , transverse momentum , @xmath12 , and the boost - invariant variable , @xmath13 , i.e. , @xmath14 , and may be found analytically @xcite .
in order to study approach of the system toward the local thermal equilibrium one typically analyses the deviations of pressures from the equilibrium pressure , see ref . @xcite .
alternatively , one can also study the @xmath12 spectra of the produced partons , and their approach toward the equilibrium spectrum @xcite .
for that purpose we use cooper - frye formula @xcite , which for the bjorken symmetry @xcite considered herein reduces to the following form @xmath15 where @xmath16 arbitrarily sets the transverse size in such a way that the integral ( [ cfbi ] ) gives the production per unit area .
we assume that the phase - space distribution @xmath17 in eq .
( [ cfbi ] ) is given by the sum of the quark , antiquark and gluon distribution functions satisfying transport equations ( [ kineaq ] ) , @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the number of flavours .
for the results presented herein we use the solutions from ref .
@xcite obtained for the initial field strength corresponding to the lhc case .
in the left panels of fig . [ sp1 ] we present the partonic @xmath12 spectra obtained using eqs .
( [ cfbi ] ) and ( [ f ] ) for two values of the shear viscosity to entropy density ratio , @xmath20 ( top ) and @xmath21 ( bottom ) , and various freeze - out proper times .
we observe that , except for the low-@xmath12 range , in all cases the spectra have approximately thermal - like ( exponential ) shape .
this property , sometimes called _ apparent thermalization _
, is , however , mainly related to the specific production mechanism of partons , which in our case is the schwinger tunnelling in the oscillating color field @xcite . in order to judge
if the thermalization is really achieved we propose to study the corresponding _ negative inverse logarithmic slopes _ , @xmath22 , of the spectra , @xmath23^{-1}.\label{slope}\ ] ] + + in the right panels of fig .
[ sp1 ] we compare the slopes @xmath22 of the spectra from the left panels with the corresponding slopes of the spectra of the viscous fluid , @xmath24 having the same energy density @xmath25 . in eq .
( [ lvisc ] ) @xmath26 and @xmath27 , with @xmath28 and @xmath29 being the longitudinal and transverse pressure , respectively . in the special case of the system in local thermal equlibrium , @xmath30 ,
the formula ( [ lvisc ] ) reduces to the one for the perfect fluid , @xmath31 from the fig .
[ sp1 ] we observe that , although the spectra look approximately thermal for all @xmath32 , only in the case of @xmath20 the slopes @xmath22 agree with the equilibrium ones @xmath33 within a short proper - time ( @xmath0 fm ) .
this suggest that the system undergo fast thermalization only in the case of maximal possible coupling . on the other hand ,
the discrepancies at medium and large @xmath12 observed for @xmath34 ( bottom panel ) are very well addressed within the dissipative corrections of the viscous fluid dynamics , see @xmath35 .
it means that although the fast thermalization seems to be limited to @xmath20 , the system may still undergo fast hydrodynamization if @xmath36 .
the thermalization rate of the quark - gluon plasma produced from the initial color electric flux tubes through the schwiner mechanism is studied .
once produced the partons are interacting with each other according to the collisional kernels treated in rta .
the detailed comparison of the resulting transverse - momentum spectra of partons with the viscous hydrodynamics ones is done .
obtained results suggest that , although the early thermalization may be limited to strongly coupled systems ( @xmath37 ) , as long as @xmath36 the early hydrodynamization of the plasma in such reactions may be achieved .
r.r . was supported by polish national science center grant no .
dec-2012/07/d / st2/02125 . p. bozek and w. broniowski , _ phys . rev
. lett . _ * 109 * , 062301 ( 2012 ) .
p. bozek , w. broniowski and a. olszewski , _ phys .
rev . _ * c92 * , no . 5 , 054913 ( 2015 ) . w. florkowski , r. ryblewski and m. strickland , _ phys .
rev . _ * c88 * , 024903 ( 2013 ) .
g. s. denicol , w. florkowski , r. ryblewski and m. strickland , _ phys .
* c90 * , no . 4 , 044905 ( 2014 ) .
a. jaiswal , r. ryblewski and m. strickland , _ phys .
rev . _ * c90 * , no . 4 , 044908 ( 2014 ) . m. nopoush , m. strickland , r. ryblewski , d. bazow , u. heinz and m. martinez , _ phys . rev . _ * c92 * , no . 4 , 044912 ( 2015 ) .
s. mrowczynski , _ phys .
rev . _ * c49 * , 2191 ( 1994 ) .
a. rebhan , m. strickland and m. attems , _ phys .
rev . _ * d78 * , 045023 ( 2008 ) .
a. rebhan , p. romatschke and m. strickland , _ jhep _ * 0509 * , 041 ( 2005 ) .
t. epelbaum and f. gelis , _ phys .
lett . _ * 111 * , 232301 ( 2013 ) .
j. berges , k. boguslavski , s. schlichting and r. venugopalan , _ phys .
rev . _ * d89 * , no . 7 , 074011 ( 2014 ) .
a. kurkela and y. zhu , _ phys .
lett . _ * 115 * , no .
18 , 182301 ( 2015 ) .
m. chesler and l. g. yaffe , _ phys .
lett . _ * 106 * , 021601 ( 2011 ) .
s. caron - huot , p. m. chesler and d. teaney , _ phys .
rev . _ * d84 * , 026012 ( 2011 ) .
m. p. heller , r. a. janik and p. witaszczyk , _ phys .
lett . _ * 108 * , 201602 ( 2012 ) .
w. van der schee , p. romatschke and s. pratt , _ phys .
lett . _ * 111 * , no .
22 , 222302 ( 2013 ) .
r. ryblewski and w. florkowski , _ phys .
* d88 * , 034028 ( 2013 ) .
j. jankowski , g. plewa and m. spalinski , _ jhep _ * 1412 * , 105 ( 2014 ) .
m. ruggieri , a. puglisi , l. oliva , s. plumari , f. scardina and v. greco , _ phys .
_ * c92 * , 064904 ( 2015 ) .
r. ryblewski , arxiv:1512.04117 [ nucl - th ] .
p. kovtun , d. t. son and a. o. starinets , _ phys .
lett . _ * 94 * , 111601 ( 2005 ) .
t. lappi and l. mclerran , _ nucl .
* a772 * , 200 ( 2006 ) .
a. casher , h. neuberger and s. nussinov , _ phys .
_ * d20 * , 179 ( 1979 ) .
a. bialas and w. czyz , _ phys .
rev . _ * d30 * , 2371 ( 1984 ) .
a. bialas and w. czyz , _ acta phys .
polon . _ * b17 * , 635 ( 1986 ) .
a. bialas , w. czyz , a. dyrek and w. florkowski , _ nucl .
phys . _ * b296 * , 611 ( 1988 ) . j. s. schwinger , _ phys . rev . _ * 82 * , 664 ( 1951 ) .
k. huang , singapore , singapore : world scientific ( 1992 ) 333p .
l. bhatnagar , e. p.
gross and m. krook , _ phys .
rev . _ * 94 * , 511 ( 1954 ) .
j. l. anderson and h. r. witting , _ physica _ * 74 * , 466488 ( 1974 )
. j. d. bjorken , _ phys .
rev . _ * d27 * , 140 ( 1983 ) .
f. cooper and g. frye , _ phys .
_ * d10 * , 186 ( 1974 ) .
a. bialas , _ phys .
_ * b466 * , 301 ( 1999 ) .
w. florkowski , _ acta phys .
polon . _ * b35 * , 799 ( 2004 ) .
|
more than decade properties new state matter quark - gluon plasma ( qgp ) studied with ultra - relativistic heavy - ion collisions at rhic lhc expected results few outstanding surprises analysis particle correlations experimental data revealed contrast to earlier expectations asymptotic quantum chromodynamics qgp strongly coupled system with lowest viscosity in nature well described within relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics predictive power limited due to precise knowledge initial conditions qualitative information on amplitude viscous corrections after collision may question applicability viscous fluid dynamics in modelling study of approach created qgp toward local thermal equilibrium thermalization highest interest for heavy - ion physics proceedings review main results study qgp thermalization rate color - flux - tube model @xcite detailed analysis transverse - momentum spectra partons difficult to fully thermalize system within short time unless shear viscosity to entropy density ratio of ads / cft lower bound @xmath1 for @xmath2 observed deviations from equilibrium state well described within dissipative corrections of viscous hydrodynamicsobservation confirms fast hydrodynamization qgp proposed in ref . saturation physics due ultra - relativistic energies particles produced in midrapidity heavy - ion collisions originate from decay longitudinal color fields receding color - charged nuclei proposed describe physics simplified model initial color electric flux tube treated abelian dominance approximation decays into quarks gluons schwinger tunneling mechanism phase - space densities of quarks antiquarks charged gluons described by kinetic boltzmann - vlasov - type equations @xmath3 partons couple to mean color field @xmath4 through charges @xmath5 quarks antiquarks gluons color indices @xmath8 run 1 to 3 first terms denote particle production due to schwinger tunnelling subsequent collisions between particles through collisional kernels treated relaxation time approximation relaxation time expressed according anderson - witting formula boost - invariant transversely homogeneous system bjorken symmetry solutions of eqs depend on proper time transverse momentum boost - invariant variable@xmath14 found analytically @xcite study system local thermal equilibrium analyses deviations pressures from equilibrium pressure ref. @xcite study @xmath12 spectra produced partons approach toward equilibrium spectrum use cooper - frye formula @xcite bjorken symmetry reduces form @xmath15 @xmath16 sets transverse size integral [ cfbi ] gives production per unit area phase - space distribution @xmath17 eq cfbi given by sum quark antiquark gluon distribution functions transport equations @xmath18 @xmath19 number of flavours results use solutions from ref . @xcite initial field strength lhc case left fig . sp1 partonic @xmath12 spectra using eqs . ( [ cfbi ] ) ( [ f ] ) shear viscosity to entropy density ratio @xmath20 top @xmath21 bottom freeze - out times low-@xmath12 range spectra have thermal - like shape apparent thermalization related to production mechanism partons schwinger tunnelling in oscillating color field @xcitejudge if thermalization achieved propose study negative inverse logarithmic slopes @xmath22 of spectra @xmath23^{-1 right panels fig . compare slopes @xmath22 spectra with viscous fluid @xmath24 same energy density @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 longitudinal and transverse pressure in special case system local thermal equlibrium @xmath30 formula reduces to for perfect fluid @xmath31 spectra thermal for all @xmath32 only @xmath20 slopes @xmath22 agree with equilibrium ones @xmath33 short proper - time system fast thermalization maximal coupling discrepancies at medium and large @xmath12 for @xmath34 addressed within dissipative corrections of viscous fluid dynamics @xmath35 fast thermalization limited to @xmath20 system may undergo fast hydrodynamization if @xmath36 thermalization rate of quark - gluon plasma from initial color electric flux tubes through schwiner mechanism studied produced partons according to collisional kernels treatedcomparison transverse - momentum spectra partons viscous hydrodynamics results suggest early thermalization limited strongly coupled systems @xmath37 @xmath36 early hydrodynamization plasma achieved supported polish national science center grant dec-2012/07/d / st2/02125 p. bozek w. broniowski . rev 109 062301 ( 2012 ) bozek broniowski a. olszewski c92 054913 ( 2015 ) w. florkowski r. ryblewski m. strickland c88 024903 ( 2013 ) denicol florkowski ryblewski strickland c90 044905 ( 2014 ) a. jaiswal r. ryblewski m. strickland c90 4 044908 ( 2014 ) m. nopoush. strickland ryblewski d. bazow u. heinz m. martinez phys c92 4 044912 ( 2015 ) s mrowczynski c49 2191 ( 1994 ) a. rebhan m. strickland m. attems d78 045023 ( 2008 ) a. rebhan p. romatschke mstrickland 0509 041 ( 2005 ) t. epelbaum f. gelis phys 111 232301 ( 2013 ) j. berges. boguslavski s. schlichting. venugopalan d89 7 074011 ( 2014 ) a. kurkela y. zhu 115 18 182301 2015 ) m. chesler g. yaffe 106 021601 ( 2011 ) s. caron - huot m. chesler d. teaney d84 026012 ( 2011 ). heller. janik p. witaszczyk 108 201602 ( 2012 ). van der schee p. romatschke s. pratt 111 22 222302 ( 2013 ) r. ryblewski w. florkowski d88 034028 ( 2013 ) j. jankowski g. plewa m. spalinski 1412 105 ( 2014 ). ruggieri. puglisi. oliva. plumari. scardina v. greco c92 064904 ( 2015 ) r. ryblewski arxiv:1512.04117 p. kovtun t. son o. starinets94 * 111601 ( 2005 ) t. lappi l. mclerran a772 200 ( 2006 ) casher. neuberger nussinov phys d20 179 ( 1979 ) bialas w. czyz d30 2371 ( 1984 ) bialas czyz acta phys b17 635 ( 1986 ) bialas. czyz dyrek w. florkowski b296 611 ( 1988 ) s. schwinger phys 82 * 664 ( 1951 ) k. huang singapore world scientific ( 1992 ). bhatnagar p. gross m. krook rev 94 511 ( 1954 ). anderson h. r. witting 74 466488 ( 1974 ) d. bjorken phys d27 140 ( 1983 ) f. cooper g. frye d10 186 ( 1974 ) a. bialas phys b466 301 ( 1999 ). florkowski acta phys b35 799 ( 2004 )
| 0.43749
| 3,126
| 1,592
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,933
|
we apply the non - linear euler - heisenberg theory to calculate the electric field inside the hydrogen atom .
we will demonstrate that the electric field calculated in the euler - heisenberg theory can be much smaller than the corresponding field emerging from the maxwellian theory . in the hydrogen atom
this happens only at very small distances .
this effect reduces the large electric field inside the hydrogen atom calculated from the electromagnetic form - factors via the maxwell equations .
the energy content of the field is below the pair production threshold .
* inside the hydrogen atom * m. nowakowski , n. g. kelkar , d. bedoya fierro and a. d.
bermudez manjarres + departamento de fisica , universidad de los andes + cra .
1e , 18a-10 , bogot , colombia
|
the electric field extracted from the electromagnetic form - factors of the proton is , in the short range ( where it differs significantly from the coulomb field ) , not a correction to the latter .
this short range part is handled as a perturbation in calculating the energy correction which is possible due to the rapid fall - off of finite size contribution outside the proton .
however , the magnitude of the electric field reaches a value up to 10@xmath0 mev@xmath1 which is not only extremely high , but also dangerously close to allowing electron - positron pair production . on the other hand , quantum corrections to maxwell s equations known as the euler - heisenberg theory yield a different picture of the same physical phenomenon inside the hydrogen atom :
the field becomes significantly smaller falling below the pair production threshold .
we outline the theory which leads to this effect .
the electromagnetic properties of the nucleons are encoded in their two form - factors , @xmath2 and @xmath3 . in calculating the elastic amplitude of the scattering process , @xmath4
, these form factors enter one of the vertices by making the replacement @xmath5 the standard procedure to extract an interaction potential from the elastic amplitude is to ( i ) expand the latter in terms proportional to powers of @xmath6 ( which leads to the non - relativistic amplitude @xmath7 ) and ( ii ) take the fourier transform , i.e , @xmath8 . in the case of the electromagnetic interaction ,
this leads to the breit equation @xcite and if we include the proton form - factors we explicitly take into account in the breit equation the finite size of the proton in @xmath9 @xcite . in terms of the so - called electric ( @xmath10 ) and magnetic ( @xmath11 ) sachs form - factors @xmath12 and @xmath13 the result of the scalar interaction potential in momentum space can be written as @xmath14\ , .\ ] ] in principle , the breit equation gives also the fine and hyperfine structure of the interaction which have to be added to the term above .
we do not spell it out explicitly here since we will not make use of it . for details
we refer to @xcite .
we can identify the first term as the coulomb term ( modified due to finite size ) @xmath15 , the second term is called the proton darwin @xmath16 and the third the electron darwin term @xmath17 .
we identify the electric potential of the proton from the breit equation as terms which are ( i ) scalar ( no spin and no momentum terms which appear in the fine and hyperfine part ) and ( ii ) independent from the properties of the test particle . by this token
the proton darwin term can be part of the electric potential , but the electron darwin not .
this has some consequences for the electric field at small distances inside the proton and also for the charge distribution .
hence we write @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the proton electric potential . as an example
let us take the dipole parametrization @xmath20 .
then we obtain ( see also figure 1 ) @xmath21 since the main issues which we want to emphasize will remain mostly insensitive to the parametrization of the electric form - factors , we shall use the dipole parameterization where the darwin terms can also be calculated analytically .
the electric field @xmath22 calculated from @xmath23 ( which includes the form - factors ) can be now as strong as 10@xmath0 mev@xmath1 .
it is reasonable to ask if this is indeed the case .
we will give a partial answer in the following two sections starting with a discussion of the the non - linear euler - heisenberg theory .
.,width=226,height=226 ] [ mo ]
at the born level , photons do not interact with each other . however , the box diagram with four external photon ( light - light scattering ) legs is an example of how quantum mechanics effectively introduces a four photon vertex .
one can introduce this effect into the lagrangian language which is known as the euler - heisenberg theory . in accordance with the gauge invariance we have to formulate the theory in terms of
the two gauge invariant quantities @xmath24 then , we can expect that in the first approximation ( weak field approximation ) the new part of the lagrangian @xmath25 is quadratic in these invariants .
indeed , euler and heisenberg obtained @xcite @xmath26 with @xmath27 our requirement of weak fields means that in @xmath28 ( @xmath29 ) the new term must be small as compared to one or @xmath30 and @xmath31 .
it then follows that @xmath32 .
the new inhomogeneous maxwell s equations now read : @xmath33 with @xmath34 \end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath35\ , .
\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the electrostatic case , putting @xmath36 and neglecting all time derivatives we can write @xmath37 where @xmath38 is the electric field as calculated using the maxwellian theory with @xmath39 ( we treat the charge distribution as a given source ) . hence , assuming spherical symmetry we end up with an algebraic equation @xmath40 with @xmath41 .
the solution is always in the form @xmath42 $ ] .
one can extend the above theory to two - loops @xcite in which case the algebraic equation will become a quintic polynomial equation of the form @xmath43 where @xmath44 .
we can apply the results of the euler - heisenberg theory in the electrostatic case for @xmath45 where @xmath22 is the electric field calculated using the electromagnetic form - factors .
the results are shown in figure 2 . as the electric field calculated from the form - factors is not a correction to the @xmath46 coulomb field at small distances
so is the result from euler - heisenberg not a correction to @xmath47 at small distances .
since the significant changes happen only at short distances , both modifications ( the finite size and the light - light modifications ) will induce only small corrections to the energy levels .
the energy content of the electric field is given by @xmath48=\int \mathbf{e}^2 d^3x$ ] .
for @xmath49 we get @xmath50\simeq 1 \ , \ , mev\ ] ] which , given the uncertainties in the form - factors , is close to the pair production threshold of @xmath51 .
on the other hand we obtain @xmath52 \simeq 0.26\ , \ , mev\ ] ] in the one - loop euler - heisenberg theory and @xmath53 \simeq 0.076\ , \ , mev\ ] ] in its two - loops version .
both results are safely below the pair production threshold .
perturbations in the hydrogen atom can be viewed as additional contributions to the coulomb potential suppressed by higher powers of the fine structure constant @xmath54 ( for instance the uehling potential @xcite ) or as very short range modifications of the coulomb potential .
the best paradigm is given by the finite size corrections to the coulomb part .
in the short range these modifications can not be considered as perturbations of @xmath55 , but their short range character qualifies them as perturbative contributions in the hydrogen atom .
a similar situation occurs when we calculate the full non - linear contributions of light - light scattering . in the short range , where the non - linear effects are important , the modifications of the euler - heisenberg theory are not perturbative contributions to the coulomb potential , but as in the case of the finite size effects they will contribute perturbatively to the observables of the hydrogen atom . moreover , the electric field extracted from the electromagnetic form - factors via the maxwellian theory is too strong as its energy content is close to the pair production threshold .
in contrast to this , the electric field in the euler - heisenberg theory is much smaller in the short range and its energy comes out to be safely below the pair production threshold .
how this affects the electron darwin term and the hydrogen observables remains to be explored @xcite .
99 g. breit , phys . rev . * 34 * , 553 ( 1929 ) v. b. berestetskii , e m : lifshitz and l. o. pitaevskii , _ quantum electrodynamics _ , 2nd edition , oxford , butterworth - heinemann 2007 f. garcia daza , n. g. kelkar and m. nowakowski , j. phys .
* g39 * , 035103 ( 2012 ) n. g. kelkar , f. garcia daza and m. nowakowski , nucl . phys . *
b864 * , 382 ( 2012 ) ; d. bedoya fierro , n.g .
kelkar and m. nowakowski , jhep * 1509 * , 215 ( 2015 ) , arxiv:1410.4228 w. heisenberg and h. euler , z. phys .
* 98 * , 714 ( 1936 ) b. krs and m. g. schmidt , eur .
j. * c6 * ( 1999 ) 175 e. a. uehling , phys . rev . *
48 * , 55 ( 1935 ) m. nowakowski , n. g. kelkar , d. bedoya fierro and a. d. bermudez manjarres , _
static field configurations in the euler - heisenberg theory _
( under preparation ) .
|
electric field from electromagnetic form - factors proton differs from coulomb field not a correction perturbation in energy correction due to rapid fall - off of finite size contribution outside proton magnitude electric field up to 10@xmath0 mev@xmath1 extremely high close to allowing electron - positron pair production quantum corrections to maxwell s equations euler - heisenberg theory different picture hydrogen atom field becomes smaller below pair production threshold theory electromagnetic properties of nucleons encoded in two form - factors @xmath2 and @xmath3 calculating elastic amplitude of scattering process form factors enter replacement @xmath5 standard procedure to extract interaction potential from elastic amplitude expand latter proportional to powers of @xmath6 non - relativistic amplitude @xmath7 take fourier transform @xmath8 leads to breit equation @xcite proton form - factors finite size of proton in @xmath9 @xcite electric magnetic form - factors @xmath12 result of scalar interaction potential in momentum space written as @xmath14\breit equation gives fine hyperfine structure interaction added to term above spell out explicitly here for details refer to @xcite identify first term as coulomb term modified due to finite size @xmath15 second term proton darwin @xmath16 third electron darwin term @xmath17 identify electric potential of proton from as terms scalar no spin no momentum fine hyperfine part independent from properties test particle proton darwin term part of electric potential electron darwin not consequences for electric field at small distances inside proton charge distribution write @xmath18 where @xmath19 is proton electric potential dipole parametrization @xmath20 obtain figure 1 @xmath21 issues use dipole parameterization where darwin terms can calculated analytically electric field @xmath22 calculated from @xmath23 includes form - factors can as strong as 10@xmath0 mev@xmath1 ask if this case partial answer in following two sections discussion non - linear euler - heisenberg theory at born level photons do not interact box diagram with four external photon legs quantum mechanics introduces four photon vertexintroduce effect lagrangian language euler - heisenberg theory formulate theory two gauge invariant quantities @xmath24 first approximation new part lagrangian @xmath25 quadratic in invariants euler heisenberg obtained @xcite @xmath26 @xmath27 requirement weak fields @xmath28 @xmath29 new term small compared @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 new inhomogeneous maxwell s equations read @xmath33 @xmath34 electrostatic case write @xmath37 @xmath38 electric field calculated maxwellian theory @xmath39 charge distribution assuming spherical symmetry algebraic equation @xmath40 with @xmath41 solution form @xmath42 extend theory to two - loops @xcite algebraic equation quintic polynomial equation @xmath43 apply results euler - heisenberg theory electrostatic case for @xmath45 @xmath22 electric field calculated electromagnetic form - factors results shown in figure 2 electric field calculated form - factors not correction to @xmath46 coulomb field at small distances result euler - heisenberg not correction to @xmath47 small distancessignificant changes at short distances modifications finite size light - light modifications induce small corrections energy levels energy content electric field given by @xmath48= \mathbf{e}^2 d^3x$ @xmath49 @xmath50\simeq 1 mev\ uncertainties close to pair production threshold of @xmath51 @xmath52 \simeq 0.26\ mev in one - loop euler - heisenberg theory @xmath53 \simeq 0.076\ mev two - loops version results below pair production threshold perturbations in hydrogen atom additional contributions to coulomb potential suppressed by higher powers structure @xmath54 or short range modifications best paradigm finite size corrections coulomb short range modifications not perturbations @xmath55 short range qualifies perturbative contributions similar full non - linear contributions of light - light scattering short range modifications euler - heisenberg theory not perturbative potential contribute perturbatively to observables hydrogen atom electric field extracted from electromagnetic form - factors via maxwellian theory strong energy content close to pair production thresholdcontrast electric field euler - heisenberg theory smaller short range energy below pair production threshold electron darwin term hydrogen observables explored breit phys . rev 34 *, 553 ( 1929 ) berestetskii lifshitz pitaevskii quantum electrodynamics 2nd edition oxford butterworth - heinemann 2007 garcia daza kelkar nowakowski . g39 035103 ( 2012 ) kelkar nowakowski phys b864 382 ( 2012 ) bedoya fierro kelkar nowakowski 1509 215 ( 2015 ) arxiv:1410.4228 heisenberg h. euler phys. 98 714 ( 1936 ) krs m g. schmidt c6 * 1999 ) uehling phys . rev 48 55 ( 1935 ) nowakowski kelkar bedoya fierro bermudez manjarres static field configurations euler - heisenberg theory preparation
| 0.318615
| 2,109
| 1,098
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,943
|
we present a scheme of teleportation of the state of motion of atoms making use of screens with slits and cavities .
the fascinating aspects of quantum mechanics are highlighted making use of entanglement and the interaciton of atoms with slits .
pacs : 03.65.ud ; 03.67.mn ; 32.80.-t ; 42.50.-p keywords : double - slit experimant ; entanglement ; non - locality ; teleportation ; cavity qed .
|
only about twenty years ago it was put forward by bonioff @xcite and feynmann @xcite the idea of building up of computers based on the principles of quantum mechanics which was developed concretely by david deutsch @xcite in 1985 . since then it has been discussed in the literature the possible implications of quantum entanglement schrodinger and non - locality in the broad new and promising filed of research embracing quantum information and quantum computation nielsen , mathqc , pqi .
entanglement and non - locality is fascinating , and although at the same time it is conterintuitive , it can have revolutionizing impact on our thinking about information processing and computing .
einstein podolsky and rosen , noticed the implications of quantum entanglement and proposed a _
experiment , the epr experiment @xcite in order to show that quantum mechanics was not a complete theory which could explain nature correctly .
probably one of the most notable and dramatic among various concepts developed through the application of quantum mechanics to the information science and which is a consequence of entanglement and non - locality , is teleportation put forward by bennett _
et al _ @xcite , given rise to a new field of research .
quantum teleportation is an experimental reality and it holds tremendous potential for applications in the fields of quantum communication and computing @xcite . for instance , it can be used to build quantum gates which are resistant to noise and is intimately connected with quantum error - correcting codes @xcite .
as feymann put it , `` the double - slit experiment has in it the heart of quantum mechanics '' .
the double - slit experiment has been performed with many different kinds of particles ranging from photons @xcite , electrons @xcite , neutrons @xcite and atoms dlatoms . in this article
we propose a scheme of teleportation of the states of motion of atoms interacting with two - slit screens and the electromagnetic field in cavities .
we assume that the atoms are rydberg atoms with relatively long radiative lifetime @xcite .
we also assume that the cavities are microwave superconducting cavities of relatively large quality factors @xcite
let us assume two three - level lambda atoms @xmath0 prepared in the state @xmath1 and @xmath2 prepared in the state @xmath3 to pass through a double slit screen @xmath4 where behind slit @xmath5 ( at @xmath6 there is a cavity @xmath7 prepared in a coherent state @xmath8 and behind slit @xmath9 ( at @xmath10 there is a cavity @xmath11 prepared in a coherent state @xmath12 @xcite@xmath13 now , for a three - level lambda atom interacting with the electromagnetic field inside a cavity where the upper and the two degenerated lower states are @xmath14 @xmath15 and @xmath16 respectively , and for which the @xmath17 and @xmath18 transitions are in the far from resonance interaction limit , the time evolution operator @xmath19 for the atom - field interaction in a cavity @xmath20 is given by @xcite@xmath21where @xmath22 @xmath23 is the annihilation ( creation ) operator for the field in cavity @xmath20 , @xmath24 @xmath25 , @xmath26 is the coupling constant , @xmath27 is the detuning where @xmath28 , @xmath29 and @xmath30 are the frequencies of the upper and of the two degenerate lower levels respectively and @xmath31 is the cavity field frequency and @xmath32 is the atom - field interaction time . for @xmath33 , we get @xmath34where @xmath35and we have @xmath36where the even coherent state @xmath37 and odd coherent state @xmath38 are given by @xmath39@xcite , and we have used @xmath40 @xcite . taking into account ( [ ulambdapi ] ) , after atom @xmath0 has passed through the slits of screen @xmath4 and before it has passed through the cavities we have@xmath41after the atom @xmath0 passes through the cavities we get@xmath42then , after atom @xmath43 passes through the two slits @xmath5 and @xmath9 and
before it has interacted with the cavities we have@xmath44and after @xmath2 has passed through @xmath7 and @xmath45 we have@xmath46now if we detect @xmath47 and @xmath48 we get@xmath49 prepared in the state@xmath50to fly through the slits and cavities of @xmath4 .
after @xmath51 has passed through the slits we have@xmath52and after @xmath51 has passed through the cavities we have@xmath53if we detect @xmath54 we have@xmath55 now , we let atom @xmath51 evolve toward a screen @xmath56 near screen @xmath4 with one slit and a detector behind @xmath57 and detect @xmath51 at @xmath58 . if the time evolution operator for the evolution of @xmath51 toward the screen @xmath56 is @xmath59 we have , writing @xmath60 @xmath61 and @xmath60 @xmath62 , @xmath63for @xmath64 and setting @xmath65 since we assume that @xmath4 and @xmath56 are near enough such that this condition be true , we get@xmath66which are the states of motion of atoms @xmath0 and @xmath2 entangled with the cavity field states .
now we let atom @xmath0 to pass through a double slit screen @xmath67 with @xmath68 at @xmath69 and @xmath70 at @xmath71 .
before @xmath0 passes through these slits , making use of @xmath72 , we writelatexmath:[\[|\psi \rangle _ { a1-a2}=\frac{1}{n}\{|\gamma _ { 1}\rangle \langle \gamma _ { 1}|+|\gamma _ { 2}\rangle \langle \gamma _ { 2}|\}\{c_{b}|\zeta _ { 21}\rangle the evolution toward @xmath67 the operator @xmath59 and @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath74 @xmath76 @xmath77 and @xmath78 @xmath79 we have@xmath80if we detect atom @xmath0 using a screen @xmath81 with one slit at @xmath82 and a detector behind this slit , we get@xmath83now , we assume that atom @xmath0 is far enough from the screen @xmath67 so that the spherical waves @xmath84 and @xmath85 have evolved in such a way that we can consider @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88and therefore we can write@xmath89this is the state of motion of @xmath2 which is far apart from the screen @xmath4 to be teleported to another atom @xmath90 . in order to do so we pass an atom @xmath90 through @xmath5 and @xmath91 in screen @xmath4 and @xmath7 and @xmath45
. then we have , after @xmath90 has passed through the slits@xmath92and after @xmath90 has passed through the cavities@xmath93now , we let atom @xmath2 to pass through a screen @xmath94 with two slits @xmath95 ( at @xmath96 ) and @xmath97 ( at @xmath98 ) and before @xmath2 passes through the slits , using @xmath99 , we have @xmath100and writing @xmath101 @xmath102 , @xmath101 @xmath103 , @xmath104 @xmath105 and @xmath104 @xmath106 we havelatexmath:[\]]and if we detect atom @xmath120 in state @xmath123 finally we get @xmath130and the teleportation is completed successfully . in the above disentanglement process
we can choose coherent field states with a photon - number distribution with a sharp peak at average photon number @xmath131 so that , to a good approximation , @xmath132 and @xmath133 , where @xmath134 is the integer nearest @xmath135 , and we could choose , for instance @xmath136 , so that we would have @xmath137 and @xmath138 . in this case atom @xmath120 would be detected in state @xmath123 with almost @xmath139 of probability .
therefore , proceeding this way , we can guarantee that the atomic and field states will be disentangled successfully as we would like . in fig .
1 we show the set - up of the teleportation experiment . concluding , we have presented a scheme of teleportation of the spacial state ( a state of the continuum ) of atoms making use of cavities and screens with slits .
teleportation shows dramatically the strange and fascinating behavior we can find in quantum mechanics due to entanglement .
the experiments involving screens with slits also shows the strange and fascinating aspects of quantum mechanics . in this work
we have combined teleportation with slit experiments and shown in one strike the beautiful and fascinating aspects of quantum mechanics . *
fig . 1 - * experimental set - up of the teleportation .
atom @xmath0 pass through the screen @xmath4 , cavities @xmath7 and @xmath45 , detector @xmath140 , screens @xmath141 and @xmath81 and finally its position is detected in detector @xmath142 .
atom @xmath2 pass through the screen @xmath4 , cavities @xmath7 and @xmath45 , detector @xmath143 , screens @xmath94 and @xmath108 and finally its position is detected in detector @xmath144 .
atom @xmath51 pass through the screen @xmath4 , cavities @xmath7 and @xmath45 , detector @xmath145 , screens @xmath56 and finally its position is detected in detector @xmath146 .
atom @xmath90 pass through the screen @xmath4 , cavities @xmath7 and @xmath45 , and detector @xmath147 .
atoms @xmath148 and @xmath149 are not shown in the figure .
e. schrdinger , naturwissenschaften , * 23 * , 807 ( 1935 ) ; _ ibden _ 823 ; _ ibden _ 844 ; proc . of the am .
* 124 * , 323 ( 1980 ) ; reprinted in _
quantum theory of measuremente _
( eddited by j. a. wheeler and w. h. zurek , princeton , 152 , 1983 ) .
|
twenty years ago by bonioff feynmann idea of building computers based on principles quantum mechanics developed by david deutsch in 1985 since discussed implications of quantum entanglement schrodinger non - locality in research quantum information computation entanglement non - locality fascinating revolutionizing impact on thinking information processing computing einstein podolsky rosen noticed implications quantum entanglement proposed experiment epr experiment @xcite to show quantum mechanics not complete theory explain nature notable concepts quantum mechanics to information science consequence of entanglement non - locality teleportation by bennett et al _ @xcite new field of research quantum teleportation experimental reality potential for applications in quantum communication computing can used to build quantum gates resistant to noise connected with quantum error - correcting codes double - slit experiment heart of quantum mechanics performed with particles photons electrons neutrons atoms propose scheme of teleportation of states of motion of atoms interacting with two - slit screens electromagnetic field in cavities assume atoms are rydberg atoms with long radiative lifetimeassume cavities microwave superconducting large quality factors assume two three - level lambda atoms @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2 through double slit screen @xmath4 behind slit @xmath5 @xmath6 cavity @xmath7 coherent state cavity @xmath11 coherent state @xmath12@xmath13 three - level lambda atom interacting electromagnetic field cavity upper lower states @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 transitions far from resonance interaction limit time evolution operator @xmath19 atom - field interaction cavity @xmath20 @xcite @xmath22 @xmath23 annihilation creation operator field cavity @xmath20 coupling constant detuning @xmath28 frequencies upper two lower levels @xmath31 cavity field frequency @xmath32 atom - field interaction time @xmath33 @xmath34where even coherent state @xmath37 odd coherent state @xmath38 given by @xmath39@xcite used @xmath40after atom @xmath0 passed slits @xmath4 cavities@xmath41after @xmath0 cavities @xmath43 passes slits @xmath5 @xmath9 cavities@xmath44and @xmath2 passed @xmath7 @xmath45 detect @xmath47 @xmath48@xmath49@xmath50to fly through slits cavities @xmath4 after @xmath51 passed slits@xmath52and@xmath53if detect @xmath54@xmath55 atom @xmath51 evolve toward screen @xmath56 near @xmath4 one slit detector behind @xmath57 detect @xmath51 at @xmath58 time evolution operator @xmath51 @xmath56 is @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63for @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath4 @xmath56 near get@xmath66which states motion atoms @xmath0 @xmath2 cavity field states atom @xmath0 pass through double slit screen @xmath67 with @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71@xmath0 passes slits @xmath72 writelatexmath\psi \rangle a1-a2}\frac{1}{n}\gamma 1}\rangle 1} 2}{b}\zeta 21} evolution toward @xmath67 operator @xmath59 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath79@xmath80if detect atom @xmath0 screen @xmath81 slit @xmath82 detector get@xmath83now assume atom @xmath0 far from screen @xmath67 spherical waves @xmath84 @xmath85 evolved consider @xmath86 @xmath87 write@xmath89this state motion @xmath2 far apart from screen @xmath4 teleported atom @xmath90 pass atom @xmath90 through @xmath5 @xmath91 @xmath4 @xmath7 @xmath45after @xmath90 passed through slits@xmath92and cavities let atom @xmath2 pass through screen @xmath94 with two slits @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 ) before @xmath2 passes slits using @xmath99 have @xmath100and @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath105 @xmath106 detect atom @xmath120 in state @xmath123 get @xmath130and teleportation completed choose coherent field states photon - number distribution sharp peak at average photon number @xmath131 @xmath132 @xmath133 @xmath134 nearest @xmath135 choose @xmath136 @xmath137 and @xmath138 atom @xmath120 detected in state @xmath123 with almost @xmath139 probability guarantee atomic field states disentangled successfully fig . 1 set - up teleportation experiment presented scheme of teleportation of spacial state of atoms cavities screens with slits teleportation shows strange behavior quantum mechanics due to entanglement experiments screens with slits aspects quantum mechanics combined teleportation with slit experiments shown aspects quantum mechanics fig .experimental set teleportation atom @xmath0 screen @xmath4 cavities detector @xmath140 screens position detected detector @xmath142 atom @xmath2 @xmath4 cavities detector screens @xmath94 position detected detector @xmath144 atom @xmath51 @xmath4 cavities detector screens @xmath56 position detected detector @xmath146 atom @xmath90 screen @xmath4 cavities detector @xmath147 atoms @xmath148 @xmath149 not shown figure schrdinger naturwissenschaften 23 , 807 ( 1935 ) ibden _ 823 844 124 , 323 ( 1980 ) reprinted quantum theory measuremente eddited j a. wheeler w h. zurek princeton , 152 , 1983 )
| 0.348511
| 2,370
| 1,262
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,963
|
the summation formula within pascal triangle resulting in the fibonacci sequence is extended to the @xmath0-binomial coefficients @xmath0-gaussian triangles @xcite .
ams classification numbers : 11b39 , 11a39 .
|
the fibonacci sequence origin is attributed and referred to the first edition ( lost ) of `` fiber abaci '' ( 1202 ) by leonardo fibonacci [ pisano ] ( see second edition from 1228 reproduced as il liber abaci di leonardo pisano publicato secondo la lezione codice maglibeciano by baldassarre boncompagni in scritti di leonardo pisano vol . 1 , ( 1857 ) , rome ) .
this note is inspired by @xcite and by primary binomial summation formula ( [ summ1 ] ) for @xmath1 : @xmath2 it is the famous and popular now identity ( [ summ2 ] ) propagated via internet @xcite .
here it is : @xmath3 this respectable relation and the property of pascal triangle is illustrated by the figure 1 . _
( see : @xcite ) + the connection constants @xmath14 from relation ( [ contriad ] ) of the triad @xcite under consideration are interpreted @xcite as the number of @xmath15-dimensional subspaces in @xmath16-th dimensional space @xmath17 over galois field @xmath18 . restarting this in incidence algebras language @xcite
we conclude that in the lattice @xmath19 of all subspaces of @xmath17 : @xmath20 @xmath21:=the\;number\;of\;distinct\;elements\;\textrm{z}\;in\;a\;segment\ ; [ \textrm{x , y}]\ ] ] @xmath22\;is\;of\;type\;\beta\;while\ ; [ \textrm{z , y}]\;is\;of\;type\;\gamma,\ ] ] where @xmath23 and the type of @xmath24 $ ] is equal to dim[x / y ] .
( here [ y / x ] denotes the subtraction of linear subspaces @xcite ) . _
the corresponding to ( [ contriad ] ) @xmath0-gaussian - pascal triangles have analogous summation formula property as the one given by ( [ summ1 ] ) and illustrated by the figure 1 .
let it be now illustrated for the case @xmath25 by the figure 2 showing the first elements of the sequence @xmath26}\}$ ] ( @xmath27 , @xmath25 ) : @xmath28}=\sum \limits_{k\leq n } \binom{n - k}{k}_q(q^j)^{k-1},\quad n , j\geq 0,\;\;q\geq 1}\\ { f_0^{[q^j]}=0 } \end{array } } } \right.\ ] ] we shall call the sequence of sequences defined by ( [ f - g ] ) and with given `` the fibonacci @xmath0-gauss family '' of @xmath29-pascal @xmath0-gauss sequences . for @xmath4 ( [ f - g ] ) becomes ( [ summ2 ] ) and we get the pascal triangle case with the resulting fibonacci sequence via ( [ summ1 ] ) or ( [ summ2 ] ) .
using the recurrence ( [ contriad ] ) one derives - in a way one does that in @xmath4 case - the following recurrence relations for the fibonacci @xmath0-gauss family sequences : @xmath30}=f_{n+1}^{[q^{j+1}]}+f_{n}^{[q^j]},\quad n , j \geq 0,\;q\geq 1,}\\ { f_0^{[q^j]}=0}\\ { f_1^{[q^j]}=q_0^j } \end{array } } } \right.\ ] ] 10 a. k. kwaniewski : _ on duality triads _ , bull . soc .
letters d * 53 * rech .
* 42 * ( 2003 ) , 11 .
arxiv : math.gm/0402260 v1 feb .
2004 a. k. kwaniewski : _ on fibonomial and other triangles versus duality triads _ , bull .
letters d * 53 * rech .
* 42 * ( 2003 ) , 27 .
arxiv : math.gm/0402288 v1 feb .
2004 dunlap-54 ( corrected ) , vajda-54 ( corrected ) : _ summations with binomial coefficients _ , http://www.mcs.survey.ac.uk/personal/r.knott/fibonacci/fibformulae.html http://www.mcs.survey.ac.uk/personal/r.knott/fibonacci/fibmaths.html e. spiegel , gh .
j. odonnell : _ incidence algebras _ , marcel dekker , inc basel 1997 .
|
fibonacci sequence origin first edition fiber abaci '' ( 1202 ) by leonardo fibonacci pisano second edition 1228 liber abaci di leonardo pisano publicato codice maglibeciano by baldassarre boncompagni in scritti di leonardo pisano vol . 1 1857 rome note inspired by @xcite primary binomial summation formula for @xmath1 : @xmath2 famous popular identity propagated via internet @xmath3 relation property pascal triangle illustrated by figure 1 connection constants @xmath14 relation triad interpreted as number of @xmath15-dimensional subspaces in @xmath16-th dimensional space @xmath17 over galois field @xmath18 lattice @xmath19 subspaces of @xmath17 : @xmath20 @xmath21;number;distinct;elements;segment @xmath22 @xmath23 type of @xmath24 equal to dim[x / y ] y / x ] denotes subtraction of linear subspaces@xmath0-gaussian - pascal triangles analogous summation formula summ1 illustrated figure 1 illustrated @xmath25 figure 2 first elements sequence @xmath26} @xmath27 @xmath25 @xmath28}=\sum \limits_{k\leq n\binom{n - k}_q(q^j)^{k-1},\quad n j\geq\geq 1 f_0^{[q^j]}=0 sequence sequences defined by [ f - g ] ) fibonacci @xmath0-gauss family @xmath29-pascal @xmath0-gauss sequences @xmath4 f - g ] becomes summ2 ] ) pascal triangle case resulting fibonacci sequence via summ1 summ2 recurrence contriad derives recurrence relations fibonacci @xmath0-gauss family sequences @xmath30}=f_{n+1}^{[q^{j+1}]}+f_{n}^{[q^j]},\quad n\geq 0\geq 1 f_0^{[q^j]}=0 f_1^{[q^j]}=q_0^j a k. kwaniewski duality triads letters d 5342 2003 ) 11 math.gm/0402260 v1 feb 2004 kwaniewski fibonomial triangles duality triads 53 42 2003 ) 27 math.gm/0402288 v1 feb 2004 dunlap-54 corrected vajda-54 corrected summations binomial coefficients http://www.survey.knott/fibonacci/fibformulae.knott/fibonacci/fibmaths spiegel odonnell incidence algebras marcel dekker basel 1997
| 0.178304
| 1,070
| 590
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,965
|
in this paper , we find the laplace stieltjes transform of the probability of data loss for the k - out - of - n distributed storage system with deterministic repair times .
we consider two repair models , namely the serial and parallel repair .
we show that for failure rate much lower than the repair rate , mean time of data loss for the two models is the same unlike the case for exponential repair models .
k - out - of - n storage systems , parallel repair , serial repair , reliability , mean time to data loss
|
data storage demands have been increasing very rapidly , leading to a lot of interest in distributed storage systems @xcite .
erasure - coded distributed storage systems provide reliable data storage at a a fraction of the cost as compared to the systems based on simple data replication .
characterizing the reliability of the storage system is an important problem .
reliability has been explored for exponential repair times for serial repair @xcite and parallel repair @xcite models .
recently , there has been interest to characterize the reliability for deterministc repair times @xcite , where geometric interpretations are provided . however , there is no complete characterization of reliability for parallel and serial repair models .
the authors of @xcite considers availability of the k - out - of - n systems with general repair times while this paper considers the reliability of k - out - of - n systems . in this paper
, we give the laplace stieltjes transform of the probability of data loss for both parallel and serial repair models . using the laplace stieltjes transform formulas , mean time to data loss can be found . even though expressions are difficult to evaluate exactly , we can find the dominant terms for the case when repair rate is much higher than the failure rate and find that the dominant term for the serial repair is the same as in the case of exponential repair in @xcite .
however , we also find that the parallel repair also gives the same dominant term as the serial repair , and thus not achieving the @xmath0 factor improvement in mean time to data loss as given in @xcite for the parallel exponential repair .
the results are compared in simulations , where we see that the mean time to data loss with parallel repair is higher , but the asymptote as the repair rate increases is the same .
the rest of the paper is organized as follows . in section 2
, we give our results for the serial repair model .
section 3 presents our results for the parallel repair model .
section 4 gives the numerical results and section 5 concludes this paper .
the serial repair model can be described with the following assumptions .
1 . @xmath1 components ( disks ) are identical and independent .
the failure rate for each disk is constant , and equals @xmath2 ( failure time is exponentially distributed for each disk ) .
3 . the repair times are independent and fixed , and equals @xmath3 .
4 . the repair for the previous broken components must be re - initialized when a new component fails , and only the newest broken component is repaired . 5 . the system stops working when @xmath4 components have failed for @xmath5 , @xmath6 .
suppose that the probability of data loss in time @xmath7 is @xmath8 .
then the laplace stieltjes transform of reliability is given as @xmath9 $ ] , where @xmath10 is the random variable representing the time to data loss , and @xmath11 .
the next result gives the laplace stieltjes transform of reliability for serial repair .
the laplace stieltjes transform of reliability for serial repair is given by @xmath12 where @xmath13 let @xmath14 be the one - step transition probability from state @xmath15 to state @xmath16 in time @xmath7 , in which one - step implies that there is only one repair or failure during an interval of time @xmath7 .
then , @xmath14 is given as @xmath17 the laplace - stieltjes transform is given by @xmath13 let @xmath18 be the first recurrence time from state @xmath15 to state @xmath16 .
then , @xmath18 is given as @xmath19 the laplace - stieltjes transform is then given by @xmath20 the above can be used to write @xmath21 let @xmath22 be the probability that the system is at state @xmath15 at time @xmath7 starting from state @xmath23 at time @xmath24 , and let @xmath25 be the laplace - steiltjes transform .
then , the probability of data loss is given by @xmath26 .
thus , it is enough to find @xmath27 . from equation
, we have @xmath28 using @xmath29 , we can find the mean time to data loss as @xmath30 .
given the exact expression of @xmath29 , we can evaluate @xmath30 .
however , the expression is cumbersome and thus omitted .
we consider however the scenario where @xmath31 and give the mean time to data loss in that scenario . the mean time to data loss for serial deterministic repair for @xmath31
is approximately given as @xmath32 the proof follows by using expression for @xmath30 and ignoring all terms of lower order .
the detailed steps are omitted .
we note that for exponential serial repair model with rate of repair @xmath33 , mean time to data loss was characterized in @xcite , and is given as @xmath34 with an approximation given as @xcite @xmath35 we note that the mtdl approximation for serial repair with deterministic repair is the same as the approximation with exponential repair for @xmath36 .
the parallel repair model can be described with the following assumptions .
1 . @xmath1 components ( disks ) are identical and independent .
the failure rate for each disk is constant , and equals @xmath2 ( failure time is exponentially distributed for each disk ) .
3 . the repair times are independent and fixed , and equals @xmath3 .
4 . the repair for the previous broken components must be re - initialized when a new component fails , and all the broken components are simultaneously repaired . 5 . the system stops working when @xmath4 components have failed for @xmath5 , @xmath6 .
suppose that the probability of data loss in time @xmath7 is @xmath37 .
then the laplace stieltjes transform of reliability is given as @xmath38 $ ] , where @xmath10 is the random variable representing the time to data loss , and @xmath39 .
the next result gives the laplace stieltjes transform of reliability for parallel repair .
the laplace stieltjes transform of reliability for parallel repair is given by @xmath40 where @xmath41 the above can be simplified to @xmath42 the proof steps are very similar to that for serial repair model , where the difference is that all the failed components get repaired simultaneously thus going from state i to state 0 on repair rather than to state i-1 for the serial repair model .
using @xmath43 , we can find the mean time to data loss as @xmath44 . given the exact expression of @xmath43
, we can evaluate @xmath44 .
however , the expression is cumbersome and thus omitted .
we consider however the scenario where @xmath31 and give the mean time to data loss in that scenario . the mean time to data loss for parallel deterministic repair for @xmath31
is approximately given as @xmath45 the proof follows by using expression for @xmath44 and ignoring all terms of lower order .
the detailed steps are omitted .
we note that the approximation is the same , thus giving the same asymptotic expression as in the case of serial repsir model .
for exponential parallel repair model with rate of repair @xmath33 , mean time to data loss was characterized in @xcite , and is given as @xmath46 with an approximation given as @xcite @xmath47 thus , even though exponential parallel repair has @xmath0 times higer mtdl than serial repair , the mtdl approximations for the serial and parallel deterministic repair models is the same .
we assume @xmath48 and @xmath49 .
we assume that the failue rate is @xmath50 per year .
we plot the increase in mean time to data loss with decreasing time to repair in figure [ fig : awesome_image ] .
we note that for serial repair model , the mean time to data loss is lower for the deterministic repair model as compared to the serial exponential repair model .
we further see that parallel deterministic repair has higher mean time to data loss as compared to serial deterministic repair .
finally , we note that the approximation result approximates all these three mean time to data loss expressions as the repair time becomes smaller .
this paper gives laplace stieltjes transform of the data loss for the k - out - of - n distributed storage system with deterministic repair times .
two repair models , namely the serial and parallel repair are considered .
we show that for failure rate much lower than the repair rate , mean time of data loss for the two models is the same unlike the case for exponential repair models .
l. mearian ,
world s data will grow by 50x in next decade , idc study predicts , " computerworld , jun 2011 .
p. m. chen , e. k. lee , g. a. gibson , r. h. katz and d. a. patterson , raid : high - performance , reliable secondary storage , " journal of the acm volume 26 , issue 2 ( 1994 ) , p. 145
j. e. angus , on computing mtbf for a k - out - of - n : g repairable system , " ieee transactions on reliability volume 37 , number 3 ( 1988 ) , p. 312 - 313 .
m. s. moustafa , time dependent availability of k - out - of - n : g systems with exponential failures and general repairs , " economic quality control , vol .
59 - 66 , 2003 .
v. aggarwal , c. tian , v. a. vaishampayan , and y. r. chen , distributed data storage systems with opportunistic repair , " proc .
ieee infocom 2014 .
a. campello and v. a. vaishampayan , reliability of erasure coded systems : a geometric approach , " proc .
ieee international conference on bigdata 2013 , santa clara , ca , oct . 2013 . v. a. vaishampayan and a. campello , reliability of erasure coded storage systems : a combinatorial - geometric approach , " ieee transactions on information theory , vol .
5795 - 5809 , nov .
|
data storage demands increasing interest in distributed storage systems @xcite erasure - coded storage systems provide reliable data storage at fraction of cost simple data replication characterizing reliability storage system important reliability explored for exponential repair times serial repair parallel repair models interest reliability deterministc repair times @xcite no complete characterization of reliability for parallel serial repair models authors of @xcite considers availability k - out - of - n systems with general repair times this paper considers reliability of k - out - of - n systems laplace stieltjes transform probability of data loss for parallel serial repair models mean time to data loss found dominant terms for repair rate higher than failure rate serial repair same as @xcite parallel repair gives same dominant term as serial not achieving factor improvement in mean time to data loss results compared in simulations mean time to data loss with parallel repair higher asymptote as repair rate increases same paper organized section 2 results for serial repair model section 3 parallel repair model section 4 numerical results section 5 concludes serial repair model described with assumptions @xmath1 components identical independentfailure rate each disk constant equals @xmath2 failure exponentially distributed repair times independent fixed equals @xmath3 repair for previous broken components when new component fails only newest component repaired system stops when @xmath4 components failed @xmath5 @xmath6 probability data loss @xmath7 is @xmath8 laplace stieltjes transform reliability as @xmath9 @xmath10 random variable time to data loss @xmath11 laplace stieltjes transform reliability for serial repair given by @xmath12 @xmath14 one - step transition probability from state @xmath15 to @xmath16 @xmath7 one repair or failure interval @xmath14 as @xmath17 transform by @xmath13 @xmath18 first recurrence time from @xmath15 to @xmath16 @xmath18 @xmath19 by @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 probability system at state @xmath15 time @xmath7 starting from state @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 laplace - steiltjes transform probability of data loss by @xmath26 enough to find @xmath27equation @xmath28 @xmath29 mean time data loss @xmath30 exact expression @xmath29 evaluate @xmath30 expression cumbersome omitted consider scenario @xmath31 mean time data loss mean time data loss serial deterministic repair @xmath31 @xmath32 proof using expression @xmath30 ignoring terms lower order detailed steps omitted exponential serial repair model rate repair @xmath33 mean time data loss @xcite @xmath34 approximation @xcite @xmath35 mtdl approximation serial repair deterministic repair same exponential repair @xmath36 parallel repair model assumptions @xmath1 components identical independent failure rate disk constant equals @xmath2 exponentially distributed repair times independent fixed equals @xmath3 repair previous broken components re - initialized new component fails components simultaneously repaired system stops when @xmath4 components failed @xmath5 @xmath6 probability data loss @xmath7 is @xmath37 laplace stieltjes transform of reliability @xmath38 @xmath10 random variable time to data loss @xmath39 next result laplace stieltjes transform reliability for parallel repairlaplace stieltjes transform reliability parallel repair by @xmath40 @xmath41 simplified to @xmath42 proof steps similar serial repair model failed components repaired simultaneously state i to state 0 using @xmath43 mean time data loss as @xmath44 exact expression @xmath43 evaluate @xmath44 expression cumbersome omitted consider scenario @xmath31 mean time data loss mean time data loss parallel deterministic repair @xmath31 as @xmath45 proof expression @xmath44 ignoring terms lower order detailed steps omitted approximation same asymptotic expression serial model exponential parallel repair model rate repair @xmath33 mean time data loss @xcite as @xmath46 approximation as @xcite @xmath47 exponential parallel repair @xmath0 times higer mtdl than serial repair mtdl approximations serial parallel deterministic repair models same assume @xmath48 and @xmath49 failue rate is @xmath50 per year plot increase mean time to data loss decreasing time repair in figure serial repair model mean time to data loss lower deterministic parallel deterministic repair higher mean time to data lossapproximation result three mean time data loss expressions repair time smaller paper gives transform data loss k - out - - n distributed storage system with deterministic repair times two repair models serial parallel considered failure rate lower than repair rate mean data loss same unlike exponential repair models mearian world s data grow 50x next decade idc study predicts computerworld jun 2011 chen lee gibson patterson high - performance reliable secondary storage journal acm volume 26 2 1994 p. 145 angus computing k - out - - n repairable system transactions reliability volume 37 3 1988 p. 312 - 313 moustafa time dependent availability k - out - - n systems exponential failures general repairs economic quality control vol 59 - 66 2003 aggarwal tian vaishampayan chen distributed data storage systems opportunistic repair infocom 2014 campello reliability erasure coded systems geometric approach international conference bigdata 2013 2013 reliability erasure coded storage systems combinatorial - geometric approach transactions information theory 5795 - 5809 nov
| 0.322429
| 2,249
| 1,131
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,967
|
we provide a specific representation of convex polynomials nonnegative on a convex ( not necessarily compact ) basic closed semi - algebraic set @xmath0 .
namely , they belong to a specific subset of the quadratic module generated by the concave polynomials that define @xmath1 . [ section ] [ thm]corollary [ thm]lemma [ thm]proposition [ thm]definition [ thm]assumption [ thm]remark
|
an important research area of real algebraic geometry is concerned with representations of polynomials positive on a basic semi - algebraic set @xmath2 where @xmath3 $ ] , @xmath4 .
an important result in this vein is schmdgen s positivstellensatz @xcite which states that if @xmath1 is compact and @xmath5 $ ] is positive on @xmath1 then @xmath6 belongs to the preordering @xmath7 generated by the @xmath8 s ; bounds on the degrees in the representation are even provided in schweighofer @xcite . under a rather weak additional assumption on the @xmath8 s , putinar s refinement @xcite states that @xmath6 even belongs to the quadratic module @xmath9 generated by the @xmath8 s .
the above mentioned representation results do not specialize when @xmath6 is convex and the @xmath8 s are concave ( so that @xmath1 is convex ) a highly important case , particularly in optimization . also , as soon as @xmath1 is not compact any more then negative results , notably by scheiderer @xcite , exclude to represent _ any _ @xmath6 positive on @xmath1 as an element of @xmath7 or @xmath9 ( except perhaps in low - dimensional cases ) . for more details ,
the interested reader is referred to the nice survey @xcite .
however , inspired and motivated by some classical results from convex optimization , we show that specialized representation results are possible when @xmath6 is convex and the @xmath8 s are concave , in which case @xmath0 is a closed ( not necessarily compact ) convex basic semi - algebraic set .
namely , a specific subset @xmath10 of the quadratic module @xmath9 is such that @xmath11 is _ dense _ ( for the @xmath12-norm of coefficients ) in the convex cone @xmath13 of convex polynomials , nonnegative on @xmath1 .
let @xmath14 $ ] be the ring of real polynomials in the variables @xmath15 , and let @xmath16 $ ] be the subset of sums of squares ( sos ) polynomials . if @xmath5 $ ] , write @xmath17 , and denote its @xmath12-norm by @xmath18 ) .
if one is interested in representation of polynomials nonnegative on @xmath1 , the first polynomial to consider is of course @xmath31 where @xmath32 .
indeed , any other positive polynomial is just @xmath33 with @xmath34 .
and so , if @xmath31 belongs to some preordering or some quadratic module , then so does @xmath6 . from proposition [ prop1 ]
it is easy to establish the following result .
[ coro1 ] let assumption [ ass1 ] hold and let @xmath5 $ ] be convex and such that @xmath24 for some @xmath25 .
if the nonnegative polynomial @xmath35 of ( [ lagrangian ] ) is sos then @xmath36 for some convex sos polynomial @xmath37 and some nonnegative scalars @xmath38 , @xmath4 .
that is , @xmath39 , with @xmath9 as in ( [ quad ] ) .
in addition , the sos weights associated with the @xmath8 s are just nonnegative constants , and @xmath40 is convex .
[ def1 ] a polynomial @xmath5 $ ] is sos - convex if its hessian @xmath41 is a sum of squares ( sos ) , that is , there is some integer @xmath42 and some matrix polynomial @xmath43^{p\times n}$ ] such that @xmath44 if @xmath6 is sos - convex and @xmath45 is sos - convex for every @xmath4 , then @xmath39 . more precisely , ( [ main ] ) holds for some convex sos polynomial @xmath37 and some nonnegative scalars @xmath38 , @xmath4 . from proposition
[ prop1 ] , let @xmath35 be as in ( [ lagrangian ] ) . as @xmath6 and @xmath45 are sos convex , write @xmath46 for some @xmath43^{p\times n}$ ] and some @xmath47^{p_j\times n}$ ] , @xmath4 .
hence , @xmath48 with @xmath49 $ ] , and so @xmath35 is sos - convex . as ( [ kkt2 ] )
holds , by lemma 3.2 in helton and nie @xcite , the polynomial @xmath35 is sos , and so , by corollary [ coro1 ] , the desired result ( [ main ] ) holds .
next , consider the subset @xmath50 defined by : @xmath51 the set @xmath10 is a specialization of @xmath9 to the convex case , in that the weights asociated with the @xmath8 s are nonnegative scalars , i.e. , sos polynomials of degree 0 , and the sos polynomial @xmath40 is convex .
[ thmain2 ] let assumption [ ass1 ] hold , and let @xmath10 be as in ( [ qc ] ) .
let @xmath52 $ ] be the convex cone of convex polynomials nonnegative on @xmath1 .
then @xmath11 is dense in @xmath13 for the @xmath12-norm @xmath53 . in particular , if @xmath54 ( so that @xmath13 is now the set of nonnegative convex polynomials ) , then @xmath55 is dense in @xmath13 .
let @xmath56 and let @xmath57 .
given @xmath58 , let @xmath59 $ ] be the polynomial @xmath60 for every @xmath61 , the polynomial @xmath62 is convex and nonnegative on @xmath1 , i.e. , @xmath63 .
in addition , @xmath64 for some @xmath65 . indeed , the level set @xmath66 is compact for every @xmath67 , and so , @xmath68 attains its minimum on @xmath1 .
obviously , we also have @xmath69 as @xmath70 .
next , let @xmath71 be as in ( [ lagrangian ] ) , i.e. , @xmath72 for some nonnegative vector @xmath73 . as @xmath74 on @xmath75 , by corollary 3.3 in lasserre and netzer @xcite , there exists @xmath76 such that for every @xmath77
, @xmath78 is sos .
that is , @xmath79 and so @xmath80 notice that by definition , @xmath37 is convex .
next , as @xmath81 , @xmath82 , and so , equivalently , @xmath83 .
one may also replace @xmath91 in ( [ theta ] ) with the new perturbation @xmath92 this perturbation also preserves convexity .
in addition , not only @xmath93 as @xmath70 , but the convergence @xmath94 is also _ uniform _ on compact sets ! 1 j.w .
helton , j. nie , _ semidefinite representation of convex sets _ , technical report , mathematics dept .
, university of california at san diego , usa , 2007 . ` arxiv:0705.4068 ` .
lasserre , t. netzer , _ sos approximations of nonnegative polynomials via simple high degree perturbations _ , math . z.
* 256 * ( 2006 ) , 99112 .
polyak , _ introduction to optimization _ , optimization software inc . , new york , 1987 .
m. putinar , _ positive polynomials on compact semi - algebraic sets _
univ . math . j.
* 42 * ( 1993 ) , pp . 969984 . c. scheiderer ,
_ positivity and sums of squares : a guide to recent results _ , in : _ emerging applications of algebraic geometry _ , m. putinar and s. sullivant ( eds . ) , i m a proceedings , institute of mathematics and its applications , minneapolis , usa . to appear .
k. schmdgen , _ the @xmath95-moment problem for compact semi - algebraic sets _ , math . ann .
* 289 * ( 1991 ) , pp .
203 - 206 .
m. schweighofer , _ on the complexity of schmdgen s positivstellensatz _ , j. of complexity * 20 * ( 2004 ) , 529543 .
|
research algebraic geometry representations polynomials positive on basic semi - algebraic set @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 result schmdgen s positivstellensatz @xcite if @xmath1 compact @xmath5 positive on @xmath1 @xmath6 belongs to preordering @xmath7 @xmath8 s bounds degrees in schweighofer @xcite putinar s refinement @xcite states @xmath6 belongs to quadratic module @xmath9 @xmath8 s representation results specialize when @xmath6 convex @xmath8 s concave @xmath1 convex important optimization @xmath1 not compact negative results exclude represent @xmath6 positive on @xmath1 element @xmath7 or @xmath9 except low - dimensional cases to survey @xcite specialized representation results possible when @xmath6 convex @xmath8 s concave @xmath0 is closed not convex semi - algebraic set specific subset @xmath10 quadratic module @xmath9 @xmath11 dense @xmath12-norm coefficients in convex cone @xmath13 of convex polynomials nonnegative on @xmath1 @xmath14 ring real polynomials variables @xmath15 @xmath16 subset sums squares polynomials @xmath5 $ write @xmath17 denote @xmath12-norm by @xmath18 interested representation polynomials nonnegative on @xmath1 first polynomial consider @xmath31 @xmath32 other positive polynomial @xmath33 with @xmath34 if @xmath31 belongs preordering quadratic module @xmath6 proposition result assumption hold @xmath5 $ convex @xmath24 @xmath25 nonnegative polynomial @xmath35 sos @xmath36 convex sos polynomial @xmath37 nonnegative scalars @xmath38 @xmath4 @xmath39 @xmath9 sos weights @xmath8 s nonnegative constants @xmath40 convex polynomial @xmath5 $ sos - convex if @xmath41 sum of squares sos integer @xmath42 matrix polynomial @xmath43^ @xmath44 @xmath6 sos - convex @xmath45 sos - convex @xmath4 @xmath39 [ main ] holds convex sos polynomial @xmath37 nonnegative scalars @xmath38 @xmath4 proposition prop1 @xmath35 lagrangian @xmath6 @xmath45 sos convex @xmath46 @xmath43 @xmath47 @xmath4 @xmath48 with @xmath49 @xmath35 sos - convex kkt2 ] holds lemma 3.2 polynomial @xmath35 is sos corollary coro1 desired result main ] holds consider subset @xmath50 defined @xmath51 set @xmath10 specialization @xmath9 convex case weights @xmath8 s nonnegative scalars sos polynomials degree 0 sos polynomial @xmath40 convex assumption [ ass1 ] hold @xmath10 [ qc ] @xmath52 convex polynomials nonnegative @xmath1 @xmath11 dense in @xmath13 @xmath12-norm @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath13 set nonnegative convex polynomials @xmath55 dense in @xmath13 @xmath56 @xmath57@xmath58 @xmath59 polynomial @xmath60 @xmath61 polynomial @xmath62 convex nonnegative on @xmath1 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 level set @xmath66 compact @xmath67 @xmath68 attains minimum on @xmath1 @xmath69 as @xmath70 @xmath71 lagrangian @xmath72 nonnegative vector @xmath73 @xmath74 on @xmath75 corollary 3.3 lasserre netzer @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78 is sos @xmath79 @xmath80 @xmath37 convex @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 replace @xmath91 with perturbation @xmath92 preserves convexity @xmath93 @xmath70 convergence @xmath94 uniform on compact sets j helton semidefinite representation of convex sets technical report mathematics dept . university of california san diego 2007 arxiv:0705.4068 lasserre netzer approximations of nonnegative polynomials via high degree perturbations math z 256 2006 99112 introduction to optimization software incnew york 1987 putinar positive polynomials semi - algebraic sets univ. math 42 1993 ) pp 969984 scheiderer positivity sums squares guide recent results emerging applications algebraic geometry putinar s sullivant eds proceedings institute mathematics applications minneapolis usa schmdgen @xmath95-moment problem compact semi - algebraic sets math ann 289 1991 ) pp 203 - 206 complexity schmdgen s positivstellensatz complexity 20 2004 ) 529543
| 0.307318
| 1,893
| 1,066
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,969
|
we apply the event - chain monte carlo algorithm to the three - dimensional ferromagnetic heisenberg model .
the algorithm is rejection - free and also realizes an irreversible markov chain that satisfies global balance .
the autocorrelation functions of the magnetic susceptibility and the energy indicate a dynamical critical exponent @xmath0 at the critical temperature , while that of the magnetization does not measure the performance of the algorithm .
this seems to be the first report that the event - chain monte carlo algorithm substantially reduces the dynamical critical exponent from the conventional value of @xmath1 .
|
ever since the advent of the local metropolis algorithm ( lmc ) @xcite , monte carlo simulations of systems with many degrees of freedom have played an important role in statistical physics . near phase transitions , lmc is severely hampered by dynamical arrest phenomena such as critical slowing down for second - order transitions , nucleation and coarsening at first - order transitions , and glassy behavior in disordered systems .
a number of specialized algorithms then allow to speed up the sampling of configuration space , namely the swendsen
wang @xcite and the wolff @xcite cluster algorithms , the multicanonical method @xcite and the exchange monte carlo method @xcite based on extended ensembles . the above algorithms respect detailed balance , a sufficient condition for the convergence towards the equilibrium boltzmann distribution .
recently , algorithms breaking detailed balance but satisfying the necessary global - balance condition have been discussed @xcite . among them ,
the event - chain monte carlo ( ecmc ) algorithm @xcite has proven useful in hard - sphere @xcite and more general particle systems @xcite , allowing to equilibrate larger systems than previously possible @xcite . it has also been applied to continuous spin systems @xcite . ecmc uses a factorized metropolis filter @xcite and relies on an additional `` lifting '' variable to augment configuration space @xcite .
it is rejection - free and realizes an irreversible markov chain .
so far , however , the speedup realized by ecmc with respect to lmc has always represented a constant factor in the thermodynamic limit , although larger gains are theoretically possible @xcite . in this paper , we apply ecmc to the three - dimensional ferromagnetic heisenberg model , defined by the energy @xmath2 where @xmath3 is the unit of the energy , @xmath4 is a three - component unit vector and the sum runs over all neighboring pairs of the @xmath5 sites of a simple cubic lattice of linear extension @xmath6 . in our simulations , we consider the critical inverse temperature @xmath7 @xcite . to describe the dynamics of the system , we compute the autocorrelation functions of the energy , the system magnetization @xmath8 and the magnetic susceptibility @xmath9 the energy and the susceptibility are both invariant under global rotations of the spins @xmath10 around a common axis , whereas the magnetization follows the rotation .
we will argue that the energy and the susceptibility are slow variables , that is that their slowest time constant describes the correlation ( mixing ) time of the underlying markov chain . under this hypothesis
, we will present evidence that the ecmc for the three - dimensional heisenberg model reduces the dynamical critical exponent from the lmc value of @xmath1 to @xmath11 .
this considerable reduction of mixing times with respect to the lmc may well be optimal within the lifting approach @xcite .
the observed reduction is all the more surprising as in the closely related @xmath12 model @xcite , where the spins are two - dimensional unit vectors , the ecmc realizes speedups by two orders of magnitude with respect to lmc , but does not seem to lower the dynamical critical exponent .
applied to the heisenberg model , the ecmc augments the physical space of spin configurations by a lifting variable @xmath13 which specifies the considered infinitesimal counterclockwise rotation of spin @xmath14 about the axis @xmath15 . by virtue of the factorized metropolis filter
, this physical move can only be rejected by a single neighboring spin , @xmath16 , and the lifting variable will then be moved as @xmath17 , keeping the sense of rotation , but passing it on to the spin responsible for the rejection . in the augmented space ,
the rejections are thus supplanted by events , namely the lifting moves for arrested physical states .
the ecmc , for a given axis @xmath15 , breaks detailed balance , yet satisfies global balance , as the probability flow into each lifted configuration equals the flow out of it , to first order in the time increment @xmath18 . for the @xmath12 model of planar rotators , @xmath15 is uniquely defined as the axis perpendicular to the sense of rotation . for this reason ,
the ecmc around this axis is irreducible , and the chain length @xmath19 in this model is best taken equal to the simulation time @xcite . for the heisenberg model
, spin rotations must be about at least two axes , in order to reach the entire configuration space .
the resampling of the rotation axis is performed after the cumulative rotation angles about the previous axis reaches the chain length @xmath19 .
all configurations of the chain sample the equilibrium distribution and any uniform subset of them yield valid observable averages .
observables may be integrated during the continuous evolution or _
e.g. _ retrieved at regular intervals independent of the lifting events . for a fixed rotation axis @xmath15 , the ecmc algorithm for the heisenberg model reduces to the one of the @xmath12 model : with @xmath20 the spherical coordinates of a spin @xmath14 in a system where the @xmath21-axis is aligned with @xmath15 , the pair energy @xmath22 between spins
@xmath14 and @xmath16 is @xmath23 both @xmath24 and @xmath25 depend only on the polar angles @xmath26 and remain unchanged along the event chain . the azimuthal - angle dependence in eq .
( [ hxy_e ] ) is @xmath27 , as in the @xmath12 model .
the azimuthal angle @xmath28 increases for each ecmc chain from its initial value @xmath29 until one of its neighbors , @xmath16 , triggers a lifting @xmath30 at @xmath31 .
the latter is sampled with a single random number in the event - driven approach @xcite .
precisely , @xmath32 is given by the sampling of the positive pair energy increase : @xmath33/ \beta = \\ -j'\int^{\phi_{l , \text{event}}}_{\phi_0 } \max\left(0 , \frac{\mathrm{d}\cos(\phi_{{\boldsymbol{v } } , k } - \phi_{{\boldsymbol{v } } , l})}{\mathrm{d}\phi_{{\boldsymbol{v } } , k } } \right ) \mathrm{d}\phi_{{\boldsymbol{v } } , k } , \label{sampling_phi}\end{gathered}\ ] ] where @xmath34 is a uniform random number between @xmath35 and @xmath36 .
to solve eq .
( [ sampling_phi ] ) for @xmath32 , one first slices off any full rotations ( these @xmath37 rotations by @xmath38 yield an energy increase of @xmath39 ) , leaving a value @xmath40 , @xmath41 where @xmath42 the true lifting event corresponds to the earliest of the independent event times sampled for all the neighbors of the spin @xmath14 . in ecmc ,
monte carlo time is continuous and proportional to the total displacement of the spins .
we have checked the correctness of the ecmc , and obtained perfect agreement for the mean energy , the specific heat and the susceptibility with the heat - bath algorithm @xcite modified with the exchange monte carlo method ( or `` parallel tempering '' ) @xcite ( see fig . [
fig : static ] ) .
at the critical temperature for various system sizes . the inset shows the spin autocorrelation function of a trivial algorithm that only performs global rotations in spin space along the two axes . ] at the critical temperature @xmath43 , the correlation length @xmath44 of a model undergoing a second - order phase transition equals the system size @xmath6 and the autocorrelation time of slow variables @xmath45 diverges as @xmath46 , where @xmath21 is the dynamical critical exponent .
we measure time in sweeps : one ecmc sweep corresponds , in average , to @xmath47 lifting events and one lmc sweep to @xmath47 attempted moves .
time autocorrelation functions are defined by @xmath48 where the brackets @xmath49 indicate the thermal average and @xmath50 is set sufficiently large for equilibration .
the dynamical critical exponent of lmc for the three - dimensional heisenberg model was estimated from the autocorrelation function of the magnetization @xmath51 as @xmath52@xcite .
the over - relaxation algorithm @xcite seems to give @xmath53 @xcite which was obtained from the autocorrelation function of the magnetization , and the wolff algorithm is believed to yield a value close to zero : @xmath54 , a value obtained from the susceptibility autocorrelation function @xcite . to evaluate the correlation time and the dynamical critical exponent for the ecmc , one must pay attention to the irreversible nature of the underlying markov chain . during one event chain ,
spins all rotate in the same sense , and the system undergoes global rotations with taking into account the thermal fluctuation .
this results in fast oscillations of the magnetization @xmath51 and a quick decay of its autocorrelation function that is insensitive to the system size ( see fig . [ fig : autocorrelation ] ) , and even to the temperature .
however , this effect is also visible for a trivial algorithm , which simply performs global rotations ( see the inset of fig . [
fig : autocorrelation ] ) .
the trivial algorithm satisfies global balance , but its correlation time is infinite , as it does not relax the energy .
a similar effect appears in the ecmc for particle systems @xcite , that likewise is not characterized by the mean net displacement of particles . to characterize the speed of the ecmc
, we consider the energy density and the susceptibility that we conjecture to be slow variables at the critical temperature .
both @xmath55 and @xmath56 are insensitive to global rotations and do not oscillate . as shown in fig .
[ f : ec_aco ] , the autocorrelation functions both of the energy density and of the susceptibility are well approximated as a single exponential decay @xmath57 on essentially the same timescales .
furthermore , the finite - size behavior of the autocorrelation times indicates @xmath11 dynamical scaling .
this @xmath21 value is significantly less than for the lmc and very similar to the one obtained for over - relaxation methods , although the @xmath58 value of the cluster algorithm is not reached .
the earliest application of lifting @xcite , the motion of a particle on a one - dimensional @xmath47-site lattice with periodic boundary conditions , already featured the decrease of the dynamical scaling exponent from @xmath59 to @xmath60 ( the reduction of the mixing time from @xmath61 to @xmath62 ) . to reach such reductions
, the markov chain must be irreversible .
it was pointed out that the `` square - root '' decrease of the critical exponent was the optimal improvement @xcite .
the concepts of factorized metropolis filters and of infinitesimal moves bring irreversible lifting algorithms to general @xmath47-body systems , although only finite speed - ups were realized so far in the @xmath63 limit .
the three - dimensional heisenberg model seems to be a first such ecmc application with a lowered critical dynamical exponent .
our observation relies on the hypotheses that the energy and the susceptibility are indeed `` slow '' variables , and that the observed decay of the autocorrelation function continues for larger times .
however , in fig .
[ f : ec_aco ] , a crossover from @xmath60 back to @xmath59 as it was observed in the @xmath12-model after @xmath64 sweeps @xcite appears unlikely to arise after hundreds of sweeps .
the dynamical critical exponent @xmath0 represents a maximal improvement with respect to the @xmath65 of lmc , supposing again that the theorems of ref .
@xcite apply to infinitesimal markov chains . in summary ,
we have successfully applied ecmc to the heisenberg model in three dimensions .
ecmc shows considerable promise for spin models , and the numerical data presented in this paper allow us to formulate the exciting conjecture that the dynamical critical exponent for the heisenberg model is @xmath66 .
ecmc is also applicable to frustrated magnets and spin glasses , which involve antiferromagnetic interactions and/or quenched disorder .
our preliminary study indicates that the ecmc algorithm is also useful for a heisenberg spin glass model .
ecmc can be easily combined with other algorithms such as the exchange monte carlo method and the over - relaxation algorithm in the usual manner .
this may allow to investigate the three - dimensional heisenberg spin glass model in the low - temperature region .
large - scale simulations in this direction are currently in progress
. it would be very interesting to understand why ecmc is so much more successful in the heisenberg model than both in hard and soft disks and in the @xmath12 model .
yn and kh thank s. hoshino and m. j. miyama for useful discussions , and j. takahashi and y. sakai for carefully reading the manuscript .
this research was supported by grants - in - aid for scientific research from the jsps , japan ( nos .
25120010 and 25610102 ) , and jsps core - to - core program `` nonequilibrium dynamics of soft matter and information . ''
this work was granted access to the hpc resources of mesopsl financed by the region ile de france and the project equip@meso ( reference anr-10-eqpx-29 - 01 ) of the programme investissements davenir supervised by the agence nationale pour la recherche .
|
local metropolis algorithm lmc ) @xcite monte carlo simulations systems freedom in statistical physics near phase transitions lmc hampered by dynamical arrest phenomena slowing for second nucleation coarsening at first glassy behavior in disordered systems specialized algorithms speed up sampling configuration space swendsen wang wolff cluster algorithms multicanonical method exchange monte carlo method algorithms respect detailed balance for equilibrium boltzmann distribution algorithms breaking detailed balance satisfying global - balance condition discussed @xcite event - chain monte carlo ( ecmc ) algorithm @xcite useful in hard - sphere general particle systems larger systems applied to continuous spin systems ecmc uses factorized metropolis filter additional lifting variable configuration space rejection - free realizes irreversible markov chain speedup ecmc lmc constant factor in thermodynamic limit larger gains possible apply ecmc to three - dimensional ferromagnetic heisenberg model defined by energy @xmath2 unit energy three unit vector sum runs over neighboring pairs sites of cubic lattice of linear extensionsimulations consider critical inverse temperature @xmath7 @xcite dynamics system compute autocorrelation functions energy system magnetization @xmath8 magnetic susceptibility @xmath9 energy susceptibility invariant under global rotations spins @xmath10 axis magnetization follows rotation energy susceptibility slow variables slowest time constant describes correlation mixing time markov chain evidence ecmc three - heisenberg model reduces dynamical critical exponent from @xmath1 to @xmath11 reduction mixing times optimal lifting approach @xcite reduction surprising @xmath12 model spins two - dimensional vectors ecmc realizes speedups two orders lmc lower dynamical critical exponent applied heisenberg model ecmc augments physical space spin configurations lifting variable @xmath13 infinitesimal counterclockwise rotation spin @xmath14 about axis @xmath15 factorized metropolis filter move rejected by single neighboring spin @xmath16 lifting variable moved as @xmath17 sense rotation spin responsible rejection augmented space rejections supplanted by events lifting moves for arrested physical statesecmc for axis @xmath15 breaks balance satisfies global balance flow into lifted configuration equals flow out time increment @xmath18 @xmath12 model @xmath15 axis perpendicular to rotation ecmc around axis irreducible chain length @xmath19 equal to simulation time @xcite heisenberg model spin rotations two axes reach entire configuration space resampling rotation axis after rotation chain length @xmath19 configurations sample equilibrium distribution yield valid observable averages observables integrated during evolution or retrieved at intervals lifting events fixed rotation axis @xmath15 ecmc algorithm heisenberg model reduces to @xmath12 model @xmath20 spherical coordinates spin @xmath14 @xmath21-axis aligned with @xmath15 pair energy @xmath22 between spins and is @xmath23 @xmath24 and @xmath25 depend on polar angles @xmath26 remain unchanged event chain azimuthal - angle dependence in eq is @xmath27 model azimuthal angle @xmath28 increases for each ecmc chain from until triggers lifting at @xmath31latter sampled with single random number event - driven approach @xcite @xmath32 given sampling positive pair energy increase @xmath33/ \beta = -j'\int^{\phi_{l{event\phi_0\left{\mathrm{d(\phi{sampling_phi{gathered @xmath34 uniform random number between @xmath35 @xmath36 solve eq sampling_phi @xmath32 slices off full rotations @xmath37 rotations @xmath38 yield energy increase @xmath39 leaving value @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 true lifting event corresponds earliest independent event times sampled neighbors spin @xmath14 monte carlo time continuous proportional to total displacement spins checked correctness ecmc obtained agreement for mean energy specific heat susceptibility with heat - bath algorithm @xcite modified exchange monte carlo method parallel tempering @xcite fig . critical temperature for various system sizes shows spin autocorrelation function trivial algorithm global rotations in spin space two axescritical temperature @xmath43 correlation length @xmath44 model second transition equals system size @xmath6 autocorrelation time slow variables @xmath45 diverges @xmath46 @xmath21 dynamical critical exponent measure time in sweeps one ecmc sweep corresponds @xmath47 lifting events one lmc sweep @xmath47 attempted moves time autocorrelation functions defined by @xmath48 brackets @xmath49 indicate thermal average @xmath50 large for equilibration dynamical critical exponent lmc three - dimensional heisenberg model estimated from autocorrelation function magnetization @xmath51 @xmath52@xcite over - relaxation algorithm @xcite @xmath53 @xcite autocorrelation wolff algorithm value close to zero @xmath54 susceptibility autocorrelation function @xcite evaluate correlation time dynamical critical exponent ecmc irreversible nature markov chain event chain spins rotate system global rotations thermal fluctuation results fast oscillations magnetization quick decay autocorrelation function insensitive to system size temperature effect visible for trivial algorithm global rotations satisfies global balance correlation time infinite relax energysimilar effect in ecmc particle systems @xcite not characterized by mean displacement speed energy density susceptibility slow variables at critical temperature @xmath55 @xmath56 insensitive to global rotations oscillate fig autocorrelation functions energy density susceptibility approximated as single exponential decay @xmath57 on same timescales finite - size behavior autocorrelation indicates @xmath11 dynamical scaling @xmath21 value less than lmc similar to over - relaxation methods @xmath58 value cluster algorithm not reached earliest application lifting @xcite featured decrease dynamical scaling exponent from to reduction mixing time from to reductions markov chain must irreversible square - root decrease of critical exponent optimal improvement @xcite factorized metropolis filters infinitesimal moves bring irreversible lifting algorithms to @xmath47-body systems finite speed - ups realized in @xmath63 limit three - dimensional heisenberg model first ecmc application with lowered critical dynamical exponent observation relies on hypotheses energy susceptibility are slow variables decay autocorrelation function continues for larger timesin fig . f ec_aco crossover from @xmath60 to @xmath59 after @xmath64 sweeps @xcite unlikely arise after hundreds sweeps dynamical critical exponent @xmath0 maximal improvement @xmath65 lmc theorems apply to infinitesimal markov chains applied ecmc to heisenberg model in three dimensions ecmc promise for spin models numerical data dynamical critical exponent for heisenberg model is @xmath66 applicable to frustrated magnets spin glasses antiferromagnetic interactions quenched disorder preliminary study ecmc algorithm useful for heisenberg spin glass model combined with exchange monte carlo method over - relaxation algorithm investigate three - dimensional heisenberg spin glass model low - temperature region large - scale simulations in progress why ecmc successful in heisenberg model than hard soft disks @xmath12 model thank s. hoshino m. j. miyama j. takahashi y. sakai manuscript research supported by grants from jsps jsps core program nonequilibrium dynamics of soft matter informationwork granted access hpc resources mesopsl financed region ile france project equip@meso reference programme investissements supervised agence nationale recherche
| 0.498576
| 2,969
| 1,488
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,971
|
we calculate the amplitude of the lyman discontinuity for an accretion disk around a maximally rotating black hole .
the locally emitted disk spectrum is computed with a previously developed numerical model ( sincell & krolik 1998 ) and then a new general relativistic ray - tracing code is used to determine the observed spectra as a function of inclination angle , @xmath0 .
we find that lyman discontinuities are undetectable for disks viewed at inclinations @xmath1 , but a significant feature remains for disks seen face - on .
# 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 phys .
rev .
d , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 phys .
lett . , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 phys .
rev .
lett . , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 phys .
rev . ,
# 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 phys .
rep . , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 phys .
fluids , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 proc . phys .
soc . , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 nucl .
phys . , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 mod .
phys .
lett . , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 ap .
j. , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 astr .
j. , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 acta astr . ,
# 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 rev .
mod .
phys . , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 nuovo cimento c , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 sov .
phys .
jetp , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 sov .
ast .
aj , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 pub . ast . soc .
japan , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 pub .
ast .
soc .
pacific , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 ann .
phys .
( ny ) , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 yad . fiz .
, # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 sov .
j. nucl .
phys . , # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 ast .
ap .
, # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 ann .
rev .
astr .
ap .
, # 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 m.n.r.a.s . ,
# 1 , # 2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 j. de physique , # 1,#2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 j. quant . spec .
rad .
transfer , # 1,#2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 j.e.t.p .
lett . , # 1,#2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 ap .
j. ( letters ) .
, # 1,#2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 ap . j. ( supp . ) .
, # 1,#2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 ap . lett . , # 1,#2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 ap .
sp . sci .
, # 1,#2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 nature , # 1,#2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 sp .
sci .
rev .
, # 1,#2 # 1#2#3#4#4 19#3 adv .
sp .
res . , # 1,#2
|
the ultraviolet ( uv ) spectrum of seyfert galaxies is dominated by a quasi - thermal component ( shields 1978 , malkan & sargent 1982 , malkan 1983 ) which extends into the soft x - ray band ( walter & fink 1993 ) .
although this feature is usually interpreted as thermal emission from a geometrically thin , optically thick accretion disk around a supermassive black hole , recent observations cast doubt on this simple explanation .
a disconinuity at the lyman edge , either in emission or absorption , seems to be a generic feature of theoretical models of accretion disks ( blaes 1998 ) .
however , partial absorption features have been detected in @xmath2 of observed agns ( antonucci , kinney & ford 1989 , koratkar , kinney & bohlin 1992 ) .
recently , iwasawa , ( 1996 ) detected extremely broad iron k-@xmath3 line emission from the seyfert galaxy mcg-6 - 30 - 15 .
they interpret this emission as x - rays reflected by an accretion disk extending to 1.23 @xmath4 , where @xmath5 , of the central black hole . for a stable accretion disk to exist this close to the central black hole this black hole must be rotating close to its maximal value ( shapiro & teukolsky 1983 ) .
the appearance of an accretion disk around a maximally rotating kerr black hole is very different than that of a disk around a non - rotating hole .
the effective temperature of the disk is larger .
the material in the disk orbits the hole at higher velocities , increasing the range of doppler boosts of the disk radiation .
finally , the emitted radiation has to escape from a deeper potential well , which causes larger redshifts . in this paper
, we compute the observed spectrum of a viscously heated accretion disk around a maximally rotating supermassive black hole .
the rest frame spectrum of radiation emitted by the disk is computed using the code developed by sincell & krolik ( 1998 ) .
the observed disk spectrum is calculated using a ray - tracing program which we describe in the next section .
the photon equations of motion in a kerr metric are derived from the lagrangean @xmath6 using the geodesic equation @xmath7 where @xmath8 is an affine parameter and @xmath9 indicates the coordinate of interest : @xmath10 .
expressions for the metric components , @xmath11 are given by bardeen , ( 1972 ) for boyer - linquist coordinates .
equation [ eq : lagrangean eq motion ] expands to eight first - order coupled differential equations for the four space coordinates and the four components of the photon momentum .
this equation set can be reduced to six first - order equations by noting that the photon energy @xmath12 and angular momentum parallel to the symmetry access @xmath13 where @xmath14 , are conserved along a null geodesic .
it is possible to reduce the equation set further ( see bardeen , 1972 , cunningham 1975 , agol 1997 ) but this introduces complicated bookkeeping into the ray - tracing calculation .
the differential equations are integrated with a fourth - order runge - kutta routine ( press , 1992 ) .
there is one additional constant of the motion @xmath15\ ] ] which is needed to specify a particular photon geodesic . in this equation
, @xmath16 is the black hole spin parameter and @xmath17 in boyer - lindquist coordinates . to compute the observed spectrum , we choose a particular inclination angle and a grid in the impact parameters @xmath18 .
the parameter @xmath3 , which is measured in units of @xmath4 , is defined as the projected distance away from the black hole along an axis perpendicular to the spin axis of the black hole .
the parameter @xmath19 is the projected distance parallel to the spin axis .
the range of values for the impact parameters corresponds roughly to the inner and outermost radii of the accretion disk . for each pair of impact parameters , the constants of motion of the corresponding geodesic
are defined @xmath20 @xmath21 and @xmath22 .
the equations of motion are then integrated inward from @xmath23 , where @xmath24 is the mass of the black hole and we adopt geometrized units , and @xmath25 .
the integration is stopped when the geodesic either hits the disk ( @xmath26 ) , escapes to infinity or is captured by the black hole . for a geodesic
which intersects the disk at radius @xmath27 , we can compute two important quantities : the total redshift of a photon emitted by the disk at @xmath27 and escaping to infinity @xmath28 where @xmath29 are the frequency of the emitted and observed photon , and the angle at which the photon leaves the disk , @xmath30 , measured in the rest frame of the orbiting material .
explicit equations for these quantities can be found in cunningham ( 1975 ) .
the observed spectrum is found by integrating the emitted intensity over the impact parameters of all the geodesics which reach the observer @xmath31 where the factor @xmath32 arises from the invariance of the photon occupation number and @xmath33 is the spectral intensity of the radiation emitted by the disk .
for example , the intensity could be described by an analytic expression for the reflected iron line as a function of radius or a grid of numerical models of the continuum flux from an optically thick accretion disk .
in figure [ fig : continuum ] , we plot the uv continuum of an optically thick accretion disk around a maximally rotating black hole . the black hole is assumed to have a mass of @xmath34 and to accrete matter at @xmath35 , where @xmath36 is the eddington critical accretion rate .
the three curves represent three different values of the disk inclination angle , @xmath37 .
we find that the lyman edge discontinuity is unobservable when @xmath38 , but that a significant absorption feature remains at smaller inclinations .
if this model is typical of all accretion disks , then we would predict that lyman edge features should be seen in @xmath39 of all agns .
this is obviously only a very rough estimate , but it does indicate that black hole rotation is a plausible means of erasing the lyman discontinuity in a large fraction of agns .
|
ultraviolet spectrum of seyfert galaxies dominated by quasi - thermal component 1978 1982 1983 extends into soft x - ray band walter fink 1993 interpreted as thermal emission from thick accretion disk around supermassive black hole observations doubt explanation disconinuity at lyman edge emission absorption generic feature models accretion disks blaes 1998 partial absorption features detected in @xmath2 agns iwasawa 1996 detected broad iron k-@xmath3 line emission from seyfert galaxy mcg-6 - 30 - 15 emission as x - rays reflected by accretion disk extending to 1.23 @xmath4 central black hole stable accretion disk must rotating close to maximal 1983 appearance accretion disk around rotating black hole different than non - rotating effective temperature disk larger material orbits hole at higher velocities increasing doppler boosts disk radiation emitted radiation from deeper causes larger redshifts observed spectrum of heated accretion disk around maximally rotating supermassive black hole rest spectrum radiation computed using code by sincell & krolik 1998observed disk spectrum calculated ray - tracing program photon equations derived from lagrangean @xmath6 geodesic equation @xmath7 @xmath8 affine parameter @xmath9 coordinate @xmath10 expressions components @xmath11 by bardeen 1972 boyer - linquist coordinates equation motion expands to eight differential equations four space coordinates four components photon momentum reduced to six equations photon energy @xmath12 angular momentum parallel @xmath13 conserved along null geodesic reduce equation set bardeen 1972 cunningham 1975 agol 1997 introduces complicated bookkeeping ray - tracing calculation differential equations integrated with fourth - order runge - kutta routine one additional constant motion @xmath15 needed specify photon geodesic @xmath16 black hole spin parameter @xmath17 boyer - lindquist coordinates compute observed spectrum choose inclination angle grid impact parameters @xmath18 parameter @xmath3 measured @xmath4 projected distance from black hole perpendicular spin axis @xmath19 distance parallel spin axisrange values impact parameters corresponds to inner outermost radii of accretion disk each constants of motion geodesic defined @xmath20 equations motion integrated from @xmath23 @xmath24 mass black hole @xmath25 integration stopped when geodesic hits disk escapes infinity or captured by black hole geodesic disk at radius @xmath27 two quantities total redshift of photon emitted escaping infinity @xmath28 @xmath29 frequency photon angle photon leaves disk @xmath30 measured in orbiting material equations for in cunningham ( 1975 ) observed spectrum found by integrating emitted intensity over impact parameters of geodesics observer @xmath31 factor @xmath32 arises from invariance photon occupation number @xmath33 is spectral intensity of radiation emitted disk intensity described iron line function of radius or models continuum flux from optically thick accretion disk figure uv continuum of thick accretion disk around rotating black hole black hole mass of @xmath34 matter at @xmath35 @xmath36 is eddington critical accretion ratethree curves represent disk inclination angle @xmath37 lyman edge discontinuity unobservable @xmath38 significant absorption feature remains at smaller inclinations if model typical of accretion disks lyman edge features in @xmath39 all agns rough estimate black hole rotation plausible lyman discontinuity in fraction agns
| 0.26014
| 1,411
| 726
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,972
|
the @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 wave @xmath4 phase shifts have been studied in the chiral su(3 ) quark model by solving a resonating group method equation .
the numerical results of different partial waves are in agreement with the experimental data except for the cases of @xmath5 and @xmath6 , which are less well described when the laboratory momentum of the kaon meson is greater than 400 mev .
|
the kaon - nucleon ( @xmath4 ) scattering processes have aroused particular interest in the past @xcite and many works have been devoted to this issue based on the constituent quark model .
but up to now , most of them can not accurately reproduce the @xmath4 phase shifts up to the orbit angular momentum @xmath7 in a sufficient consistent way . in this work
we perform a resonating group method ( rgm ) calculation of @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 wave @xmath4 phase shifts of isospin @xmath8 and @xmath9 in the chiral su(3 ) quark model , which has been successful in reproducing the energies of the baryon ground states , the binding energy of deuteron , the nucleon - nucleon ( @xmath10 ) scattering phase shifts , and the hyperon - nucleon ( @xmath11 ) cross sections by the rgm calculations @xcite .
the model is extended to include an antiquark @xmath12 and the mixing of @xmath13 and @xmath14 is considered .
a satisfactory description of the @xmath4 phase shifts for different partial waves is obtained except for the cases of @xmath5 and @xmath6 , of which the calculated phase shifts are too repulsive and a little bit too attractive respectively when the laboratory momentum of the kaon meson is greater than 400 mev in this present investigation .
in the chiral su(3 ) quark model , the potential between the @xmath15th and @xmath16th constituent quarks can be written as @xmath17 where the confinement potential @xmath18 describes the long - range nonperturbative qcd effect and the one - gluon - exchange potential @xmath19 depicts the short - range perturbative qcd effect .
the chiral - field - induced quark - quark potential is in the form of @xmath20 and mainly signifies the medium - range nonperturbative qcd effect . in this expressions ,
@xmath21 are the scalar nonet fields , and @xmath22 the pseudoscalar nonet fields . in order to study the @xmath4 system ,
we extend our model to include an antiquark @xmath12 .
the interaction between @xmath23 and @xmath12 includes two parts : direct interaction and annihilation parts , @xmath24 where @xmath25 @xmath26 now , the total hamiltonian of @xmath4 system is written as @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the kinetic energy operator of the center of mass motion , and the explicit expressions of the potentials can be found in the literature @xcite . in our calculation
, the mixing of @xmath13 and @xmath14 is considered , and the mixing angle @xmath29 is taken to be two possible values .
one is @xmath30 ( ideal mixing ) and the other is @xmath31 ( provided by dai _ et al . _
the model parameters are fixed by some special constraints @xcite and their values are tabulated in table 1 .
a rgm dynamical calculation is made to study the @xmath4 scattering process , and the calculated phase shifts are shown in figs .
[ s0s1 ] and [ pdf ] .
experimental values are taken from the analysis of hyslop _ et al .
_ @xcite and hashimoto @xcite .
-1.6 cm -1.4 cm for the @xmath0-wave we obtain the correct sign of the @xmath32 channel phase shifts comparing with the recent rgm calculation in which @xmath33 and @xmath34 boson exchanges are considered @xcite , and our results are in agreement with the experimental data for both isospin @xmath8 and @xmath9 channels , though for @xmath35 they are a little repulsive . for the higher angular momentum results , comparing with the study of lemaire _
@xcite , we now get correct signs of @xmath36 , @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40 and @xmath41 waves , and a considerable improvement on the theoretical phase shifts in the magnitude for @xmath42 , @xmath43 and @xmath6 channels .
we also compare our results with those of the previous work of black @xcite .
although our calculation achieves a considerable improvement for all partial waves , the results of @xmath5 wave are too repulsive in both black s work and our present one .
maybe the effects of the coupling to the inelastic channels and hidden color channels should be considered in future work . from figs . 1 and 2 one can see the results are very similar for the cases of @xmath44 and @xmath45 . it is comprehensible because in both of these two cases the attraction of @xmath33 is reduced , just in different approaches . when @xmath44 the interaction between @xmath23 and @xmath46 quarks vanishes , while @xmath45 the attraction of @xmath33 between @xmath47 and @xmath48 quarks is strongly reduced .
the @xmath4 scattering process is studied in the chiral su(3 ) quark model , which has been extended to include an antiquark , by solving a rgm equation .
the numerical results of different partial waves are in agreement with the experimental data except for the cases of @xmath5 and @xmath6 , which are less well described when the laboratory momentum of the kaon meson is greater than 400 mev in the present investigation .
it turns out that our model is successful to be extended to study the @xmath4 system , and some useful information of the quark - quark and quark - antiquark interactions are obtained from this study .
this work was supported in part by the national natural science foundation of china no .
90103020 . 99 r. buettgen
_ et al . _ , _ nucl .
phys . _ * a506 * , 586 ( 1990 ) .
n. black , _ j. phys . _ * g28 * , 1953 ( 2002 ) .
d. hadjimichef , j. haidenbauer , g. krein , _ phys .
rev . _ * c66 * , 055214 ( 2002 ) .
s. lemaire , j. labarsouque , and b. silvestre - brac , _ nucl .
phys . _ * a714 * , 265 ( 2003 ) .
wang , h. yang , and j.c .
su , _ phys .
* c68 * , 055204 ( 2003 ) .
z.y . zhang _
et al . _ , _ nucl .
phys . _ * a625 * , 59 ( 1997 ) .
dai , z.y .
zhang , y.w .
yu , and p. wang , _ nucl .
phys . _ * a727 * , 321 ( 2003 ) . f. huang , z.y .
zhang , y.w .
yu , and b.s .
zou , _ phys .
lett . _ * b586 * , 69 ( 2004 ) . f. huang , z.y .
zhang , and y.w .
yu , nucl - th/0406046 .
f. huang and z.y .
zhang , nucl - th/0409029 .
y.b . dai and y.l .
wu , hep - ph/0304075 .
hyslop , r.a .
arndt , l.d .
roper , and r.l .
workman , _ phys .
rev . _ * d46 * , 961 ( 1992 ) .
k. hashimoto , _ phys .
rev . _ * c29 * , 1377 ( 1984 ) .
|
kaon - nucleon @xmath4 scattering processes aroused interest works devoted reproduce @xmath4 phase shifts orbit angular momentum @xmath7 calculation @xmath0 phase shifts isospin @xmath8 @xmath9 in chiral su(3 ) quark model baryon ground states binding energy deuteron nucleon - nucleon ) scattering phase shifts hyperon - nucleon @xmath11 ) cross sections model extended antiquark @xmath12 mixing @xmath13 @xmath14 satisfactory description @xmath4 phase shifts for partial waves obtained except @xmath5 @xmath6 calculated phase shifts too repulsive attractive when laboratory momentum kaon meson greater than 400 mev chiral su(3 ) quark model potential between @xmath15th @xmath16th constituent quarks written @xmath17 confinement potential @xmath18 long - range nonperturbative qcd effect one - - exchange potential @xmath19 short - range perturbative qcd effect chiral - field - induced quark potential @xmath20 medium - range nonperturbative qcd effect@xmath21 scalar nonet fields @xmath22 pseudoscalar nonet fields study @xmath4 system extend model antiquark @xmath12 interaction @xmath23 @xmath12 direct interaction annihilation @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 total hamiltonian @xmath4 system @xmath27 @xmath28 kinetic energy operator center mass motion explicit expressions potentials literature @xcite mixing @xmath13 @xmath14 considered mixing angle @xmath29 two possible values @xmath30 ideal mixing @xmath31 model parameters fixed special constraints values tabulated table 1 rgm dynamical calculation @xmath4 scattering process calculated phase shifts shown in figs pdf experimental values from analysis hyslop et al . @xcite hashimoto -1.6 cm -1.4 cm @xmath0-wave correct sign @xmath32 channel phase shifts recent rgm calculation @xmath33 @xmath34 boson exchanges results agreement with experimental data isospin @xmath8 @xmath9 channels @xmath35 repulsivehigher angular momentum results comparing with study lemaire _ @xcite correct signs of @xmath36 waves improvement theoretical phase shifts for @xmath42 @xmath6 channels compare results with previous work black @xcite calculation improvement for all partial waves results @xmath5 wave repulsive effects coupling to inelastic channels hidden color channels considered future work figs 1 2 results similar for @xmath44 @xmath45 attraction of @xmath33 reduced different approaches @xmath44 interaction between @xmath23 @xmath46 quarks vanishes @xmath45 attraction @xmath33 between @xmath47 quarks reduced @xmath4 scattering process studied in chiral su(3 ) quark model extended to include antiquark solving rgm equation numerical results of partial waves agreement with experimental data except cases @xmath5 @xmath6 less well described when laboratory momentum kaon meson greater than 400 mev model successful study @xmath4 system useful information of quark - quark quark - antiquark interactions obtained work supported by national natural science foundation of china 90103020nucl phys a506 586 ( 1990 ). black phys g28 1953 ( 2002 ) d. hadjimichef. haidenbauer. krein phys rev c66 055214 ( 2002 ) s. lemaire j. labarsouque b. silvestre - brac nucl a714 265 ( 2003 ) wang yang j su c68 055204 ( 2003 ) z.y zhang nucl a625 59 ( 1997 ) dai z zhang y.w yu p. wang a727 321 ( 2003 ) huang z zhang y yu b zou phys b586 69 ( 2004 ) f. huang zhang y yu nucl - th/0406046 huang zhang nucl th/0409029 dai wu hep - ph/0304075 hyslop arndt l roper r.l workman phys . rev d46 961 ( 1992 ) hashimoto phys rev c29 1377 ( 1984 )
| 0.265557
| 1,724
| 916
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,979
|
the mixing properties ( or sensitivity to initial conditions ) and relaxation dynamics of the henon map , together with the connection between these concepts , have been explored numerically at the edge of chaos .
it is found that the results are consistent with those coming from one - dimensional dissipative maps .
this constitutes the first verification of the scenario in two - dimensional cases and obviously reinforces the idea of weak mixing and weak chaos .
+ nonextensive thermostatistics , henon map , dynamical systems
|
nonlinear one - dimensional dissipative systems at their critical points ( like chaos threshold , bifurcation points , etc ) have become one of the vivid areas of research since 1997 , after pioneering work of tsallis et al .
one of the relevant reason for this , in our opinion , was that they were able to constitute one of the first methods of inferring the entropic index @xmath0 of nonextensive entropy @xcite s_q= , and consequently determining the proper thermostatistics which the system under consideration obeys , from the microscopic dynamics of the system .
this method depends on the measure of the divergence of initially nearby orbits .
more precisely , the effect of any uncertainty on initial conditions exhibits , for periodic and chaotic orbits , an exponential temporal evolution as @xmath1 , where @xmath2 is the standard lyapunov exponent , @xmath3 and @xmath4 are the uncertainties at times 0 and @xmath5 ( @xmath6 for periodic cases , and @xmath7 for chaotic ones ) ; whereas at critical points ( e.g. , chaos threshold ) this feature is related to a power - law type such as ( t)= ^1/(1-q_mix ) where @xmath8 is a generalized version of the lyapunov exponent ( here , @xmath9 stands for _ mixing _ and the aim of this notation will be transparent soon ) .
this equation corresponds to power - law growth of the upper bounds of a complex time dependence of @xmath10 and these upper bounds allow us to infer the proper value of @xmath11 for the system under consideration .
let us call this method i of finding the proper @xmath11 of a given dynamical system .
the second method ( method ii ) is based on the geometrical aspects of the critical attractor of the dynamical system at the chaos threshold .
scaling arguments have shown that the appropriate @xmath11 is related to the multifractal structure of the critical dynamical attractor by @xcite = - ( q_mix < 1 ) where @xmath12 and @xmath13 are the end points of the multifractal singularity spectrum of the critical attractor and characterize the most concentrated and most rarefied regions respectively on the attractor .
this fascinating relation relates power - law sensitivity or mixing ( left - hand side ) with purely geometrical quantities ( right - hand side ) and constitutes another independent method for inferring the proper @xmath11 of the dynamical system under study .
finally , a third method ( method iii ) has been proposed for obtaining @xmath11 , dealing with the entropy increase rates @xcite .
this method is the one where nonextensive entropy @xmath14 enters directly and consequently it provides also a justification for the use of notation @xmath0 within the two previous methods .
the procedure for method iii is the following : we first partition the phase space into @xmath15 cells , then we choose one of these cells ( randomly or not ) and locate @xmath16 initial conditions all inside this cell . at any time @xmath5 , we have @xmath17 points in each cell ( naturally @xmath18 ) and thus we can define a set of probabilities through @xmath19 ( @xmath20 ) , which enable us to calculate the entropy @xmath21 . using this procedure , one can define a generalized version of the kolmogorov - sinai entropy as @xmath22 , and the proper @xmath11 value of a given system is the one for which the entropy production @xmath23 is finite . if @xmath24 ( @xmath25 ) , @xmath23 diverges ( vanishes ) .
these three independent methods ( from now on referred to as _ mixing - based approach _ ) have already been tested and verified with numerical calculations for a number of one - dimensional dissipative systems such as the logistic map @xcite , @xmath26-logistic map family @xcite , the circle map @xcite , @xmath26-circular map family @xcite , asymmetric logistic map family @xcite and the single site map @xcite .
quite remarkably , it is found that all three methods give one and the same value for @xmath11 of a given system .
it is worth mentioning here that all these numerical findings have been supported very recently by an analytical work @xcite .
we can now turn our attention to the second approach , which will be referred to as _ relaxation - based approach_. this approach has been developed by one of us and his collaborators @xcite and it is based on investigating numerically the critical temporal evolution of the volume of the phase space occupied by an ensemble of initial conditions spread over the _ entire _ phase space . in that sense , this approach differs from the mixing - based approach , where a set of initial conditions spread in the vicinity of the inflection point is used . in the beginning of time , all cells are occupied and @xmath14 is bounded by the equiprobability as @xmath27 . as time evolves , the number of occupied cells ( say @xmath28 ) starts contracting as @xmath29^{1/(1-q_{rel})}$ ] , here @xmath30 , @xmath31 stands for relaxation and @xmath32 is a characteristic relaxation time . in @xcite ,
@xmath26-logistic map family has been analyzed and @xmath33 values for @xmath26 parameter has been obtained .
the existence of two different classes of @xmath0 values coming from these two different approaches ( namely , mixing - based and relaxation - based approaches ) is also present in the results recently obtained for fully developed turbulence @xcite .
therefore , all these findings naturally force us to ask an intriguing question : are these classes connected to each other or not ?
the affirmative answer to this question came very recently by borges at al .
their procedure goes as follows : beginning with @xmath16 points located inside a single cell ( similar to method iii explained before ) , the dynamics of the system ( for @xmath34 ) leads it to a state with a stationary value of @xmath35 this is the attractor of the system for the particular conditions of @xmath15 , @xmath16 and the initial cell chosen .
the path that the system evolves towards its attractor changes as the initial cell is changed .
some of the initial cells spread the points very fast , increasing the entropy to values much higher than that of the attractor ( there is an overshooting in the time evolution of @xmath35 ) .
consequently , for these specific cases , the attractor is achieved from above .
the procedure consists in observing the rate in which the system goes to its attractor , for those initial cells which yield large overshoots .
specifically , the time evolution of @xmath36 is followed .
the procedure is repeated for increasing values of @xmath15 ( and correspondingly increasing values of @xmath16 ) .
a power - law regime appears and becomes more pronounced for increasing @xmath15 .
the slope ( in a log - log plot ) of the range of the @xmath37 curve that follows a power - law is identified with @xmath38 ( with @xmath39 ) .
it is worth to stress that @xmath40 , i.e. , the rate in which the system reaches its final state depends on the coarse graining ( @xmath15 ) adopted .
the connection between the mixing - based and the relaxation - based approaches is established by the scaling law [ scaling - law ] q_rel()-q_rel(w ) w^-|q_mix| . in this work ,
our aim is to provide further support to this connection by analyzing , for the first time , a two - dimensional dissipative system within this context . to accomplish this task ,
we will focus on the henon map @xcite @xmath41 where @xmath42 and @xmath43 are map parameters .
this map reduces to the standard logistic map when @xmath44 , whereas it becomes conservative when @xmath45 ; in between these two cases , it is a two - dimensional dissipative map .
specifically , we focus on small values of the @xmath43 parameter such as @xmath46 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 , etc .
this map has been studied within the mixing - based approach using the three different methods and it is found that the @xmath11 value for all values of @xmath43 parameter coincides with that of the logistic case , as expected @xcite . here , we first investigate the henon map within the relaxation - based approach and then establish the connection between these two different approaches following the same lines of @xcite .
as introduced in the previous section , for the relaxation approach , we follow the dynamical evolution of an ensemble of initial conditions uniformly distributed over the phase space . in practice ,
a partition of the phase space on @xmath15 cells of equal size is performed and a set of @xmath16 initial copies of system is followed whose initial conditions are uniformly distributed over the entire phase space . our results for the temporal evolution of the volume occupied by the ensemble are given in fig . 1 for various @xmath43 values .
as it is evident , after the power - law contraction of the volume occupied by the ensemble sets up , the slope [ @xmath49 is independent from the @xmath43 values and coincides with that of the logistic map ( namely , @xmath50 hence @xmath51 ) .
now we are at the position to establish the connection between this result and the one obtained in @xcite .
2 shows the temporal evolution of @xmath35 ( @xmath52 ) for different values of @xmath15 , at the edge of chaos for @xmath53 .
( it would be recommended that @xmath54 , but we adopted here @xmath55 , due to restricted computer capabilities .
of course , we compared this case with @xmath56 , and we found that the differences are negligible . ) it becomes evident that the limits @xmath57 and @xmath58 are non - commutable .
if the former is taken first , the system will never relax to a stationary state ( equilibrium is but a particular case ) , which leads to the conclusion that reaching equilibrium depends on the coarse graining adopted , and ultimately , depends on the observer !
equilibrium is only possible with incomplete knowledge ( @xmath59 ) . to arrive to the scaling law stated by eq .
( [ scaling - law ] ) , we must take first the temporal limit , and then @xmath60 .
when we consider the downhill side of these curves and take the slopes of @xmath61 versus time ( as explained earlier ) , then we end up with fig . 3 , where the verification of the scaling ( 4 ) is evident .
on the other hand , the extrapolation value of @xmath62 is computed as @xmath63 , which is different from the logistic case ( @xmath64 ) .
this discrepancy may be originated , most probably , from the fact that @xmath53 value is too large for analyzing , as it is also observed from the deterioration seen in fig . 1 of @xcite ( method i ) for increasing values of the @xmath43 parameter
. a careful investigation of the effect of increasing @xmath43 values to @xmath62 would be a subject of an extensive computational effort .
after the analysis of two - dimensional dissipative henon map at the chaos threshold using three distinct methods ( methods i , ii and iii ) @xcite , it became evident that the scenario , which we called here _ mixing - based approach _
, is valid not only for one - dimensional dissipative map families , but also for two - dimensional cases . at this point , what missing in the literature were ( i ) to study the _ relaxation - based approach _ for a two - dimensional dissipative system making use of the same procedure applied so far to one - dimensional cases @xcite , and ( ii ) to verify the connection ( given by the scaling relation ( 4 ) ) between the mixing - based and relaxation - based approaches for a two - dimensional dissipative system .
this work constitutes the first step along this line and provides some further elements that reinforce the idea of weak mixing .
this work has been supported by the turkish academy of sciences , in the framework of the young scientist award program ( ut / tuba - gebip/2001 - 2 - 20 ) .
* figure 1 * - time evolution of the volume occupied by the ensemble for various values of @xmath43 parameter .
thick line corresponds to a straight line with @xmath50 . + * figure 2 * - time evolution of @xmath35 , with @xmath52 ( log - log scale ) .
the henon map is at its chaos threshold for @xmath53 , that is , @xmath65 .
points correspond to @xmath66 , @xmath67 , @xmath68 , @xmath69 and @xmath70 . +
* figure 3 * - scaling law for the henon map ( eq . ( [ scaling - law ] ) ) , at the chaos threshold with @xmath53 .
correlation coefficient is @xmath71 . to improve the correlation
, it becomes necessary to use greater values of @xmath15 and @xmath16 , that means better computer machinery .
dashed line indicates extrapolated value of @xmath72 ( that is different from the value of the logistic ( @xmath44 ) map : @xmath73 ) .
|
nonlinear one - dimensional dissipative systems at critical points chaos research since 1997 after tsallis et al inferring entropic index @xmath0 of nonextensive entropy @xcite s_q= determining thermostatistics system from microscopic dynamics method depends on divergence of nearby orbits effect uncertainty on initial conditions exhibits exponential temporal evolution as @xmath1 @xmath2 standard lyapunov exponent @xmath3 @xmath4 are uncertainties at times 0 and @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 at critical points chaos threshold feature related to power - law type ( t)= ^1/(1-q_mix ) @xmath8 generalized version lyapunov exponent @xmath9 stands for mixing _ equation corresponds to power - law growth of upper bounds of complex time dependence of @xmath10 infer proper value of @xmath11 for system method i of finding proper @xmath11 of dynamical system second method ii based on geometrical aspects of critical attractor at chaos thresholdscaling arguments shown @xmath11 related to multifractal structure critical dynamical attractor by @xcite = - ( q_mix < 1 ) @xmath12 and @xmath13 end points of multifractal singularity spectrum characterize concentrated and rarefied regions relation relates power - law sensitivity with geometrical quantities constitutes independent method for inferring @xmath11 system third method iii ) proposed for obtaining @xmath11 entropy increase rates @xcite method nonextensive entropy @xmath14 enters directly justification for use notation @xmath0 procedure partition phase space into @xmath15 cells choose one locate @xmath16 initial conditions inside cell @xmath17 points in each cell define probabilities through @xmath19 ( @xmath20 ) calculate entropy @xmath21 define generalized version kolmogorov - sinai entropy as @xmath22 proper @xmath11 value entropy production @xmath23 finite if @xmath24 ( ) , @xmath23 diverges vanishesthree independent methods referred _ mixing - based approach _ tested verified with numerical calculations for one - dimensional dissipative systems logistic map-logistic circle map asymmetric map single site map all three methods give one same value for @xmath11 system numerical findings supported by analytical work @xcite attention to second approach _ relaxation - based approach_ developed by collaborators based on investigating critical temporal evolution of volume phase space by initial conditions spread over phase space approach differs from mixing - based approach initial conditions spread in inflection point beginning time all cells occupied @xmath14 bounded by equiprobability as @xmath27 as time evolves number of occupied cells contracting as @xmath29^{1/(1 @xmath30 @xmath31 for relaxation @xmath32 is characteristic relaxation time @xmath26-logistic map family analyzed @xmath33 values for @xmath26 parameter obtained two different classes of @xmath0 values from approaches mixing - relaxation - based present in results for fully developed turbulence @xcite findings force ask question are classes connected ? affirmative answer by borges at al procedure beginning with @xmath16 points inside single cell similar to method iii dynamics system for @xmath34 leads to stationary value of @xmath35 attractor for conditions of @xmath15 @xmath16 initial cell path towards attractor changes as initial cell changed some initial cells spread points fast increasing entropy to values higher than attractor overshooting in time evolution of @xmath35 for attractor achieved from above procedure observing rate system goes to attractor for initial cells large overshoots time evolution of @xmath36 followed procedure repeated for increasing values @xmath15 @xmath16 power - law regime pronounced for increasing @xmath15 slope of range of @xmath37 curve power - law identified with @xmath38 @xmath39 ) @xmath40 rate reaches final state depends on coarse graining ( @xmath15 ) adopted connection between mixing - and relaxation - based approaches established by scaling law q_rel()-q_rel(w work aim to provide support connection by analyzing two - dimensional dissipative systemfocus on henon map @xcite @xmath41 @xmath42 @xmath43 map parameters map reduces to standard logistic when @xmath44 becomes conservative when @xmath45 between two - dimensional dissipative map focus on small values of @xmath43 parameter map studied mixing - based approach three methods @xmath11 value for values @xmath43 coincides with logistic case investigate henon map relaxation - based approach establish connection between two approaches relaxation approach dynamical evolution of ensemble initial conditions uniformly distributed over phase space partition of phase space on @xmath15 cells @xmath16 initial copies system followed conditions distributed results for temporal evolution of volume occupied ensemble given in fig . 1 for @xmath43 values after power - law contraction slope [ @xmath49 independent from @xmath43 values coincides with logistic map @xmath50 hence @xmath51 ) establish connection between result and @xcite . 2 shows temporal evolution of @xmath35 ( @xmath52 ) for different values of @xmath15 edge of chaos for @xmath53 adopted @xmath55 due to restricted computer capabilitiescompared case with @xmath56 differences negligible limits @xmath57 and @xmath58 non - commutable if former taken first system relax to stationary state equilibrium particular case reaching equilibrium depends on coarse graining observer equilibrium possible with incomplete knowledge ( @xmath59 ) to scaling law take first temporal limit then @xmath60 consider downhill side of curves slopes of @xmath61 versus time with fig . 3 verification of scaling ( 4 ) evident extrapolation value of @xmath62 computed as @xmath63 different from logistic case ( @xmath64 ) discrepancy from @xmath53 value too large from deterioration in fig . 1 of @xcite method for increasing values @xmath43 parameter investigation of effect of increasing @xmath43 values to @xmath62 extensive computational effort after analysis of two - dimensional dissipative henon map at chaos threshold using three methods mixing - based approach valid for one - dimensional dissipative map families two - dimensional casesmissing literature study relaxation - based approach for two - dimensional dissipative system same procedure one - dimensional cases verify connection between mixing relaxation - based approaches system work first step elements idea weak mixing supported by turkish academy of sciences young scientist award program figure 1 time evolution volume ensemble for values @xmath43 parameter thick line straight line with @xmath50 figure 2 time evolution of @xmath35 with @xmath52 log - scale henon map at chaos threshold for @xmath53 @xmath65 points correspond to @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 figure 3 scaling law for henon map at chaos threshold with @xmath53 correlation coefficient is @xmath71 improve correlation necessary use greater values of @xmath15 @xmath16 better computer machinery dashed line indicates extrapolated value of @xmath72 different from value logistic @xmath44 ) map : @xmath73
| 0.435855
| 2,873
| 1,474
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
201,989
|
type ii quasars are luminous active galactic nuclei whose centers are obscured by large amounts of gas and dust . in this contribution
we present 3-band hst images of nine type ii quasars with redshifts @xmath0 selected from the sloan digital sky survey based on their emission line properties .
the intrinsic luminosities of these quasars are thought to be in the range @xmath1 , but optical obscuration implies that host galaxies can be studied unencumbered by bright nuclei .
each object has been imaged in three filters ( ` red ' , ` green ' and ` blue ' ) placed between the strong emission lines .
the spectacular , high quality images reveal a wealth of details about the structure of the host galaxies and their environments .
most galaxies in the sample are ellipticals , but strong deviations from de vaucouleurs profiles are found , especially in the blue band .
we argue that most of these deviations are due to the light from the nucleus scattered off interstellar material in the host galaxy .
this scattered component can make a significant contribution to the broad - band flux and complicates the analysis of the colors of the stellar populations in the host galaxy .
this extended component can be difficult to notice in unobscured luminous quasars and may bias the results of host galaxy studies .
galaxies : active , galaxies : structure , quasars : general , scattering 98.54.aj , 98.54.cm , 98.58.ay , 98.62.lv one of the key long - term questions in quasar studies is to identify just which properties of the galactic host ( overall morphology ?
presence of bars ?
close neighbors ?
star - formation history ?
gas content ? ) are associated with activity in its nucleus .
however , observations of quasar hosts are made difficult by the bright source in the center of the host galaxy the quasar itself ; in some cases the light from the quasar completely overwhelms the host galaxy , preventing its detection altogether . therefore , a significant advantage can be gained by studying the hosts of quasars in which the optical and uv light from the nuclear source are obscured by large amounts of gas and dust near the nucleus so called type ii quasars @xcite .
such objects have only recently been discovered in large numbers in x - ray , mid - ir and optical surveys ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) . in the optical , the strong blue continuum and broad emission lines typical of unobscured ( type i ) quasars are not observed in type ii quasars , so that narrow emission lines that originate above and below the plane of obscuration are the only signature of the presence of a hidden active galactic nucleus ( agn ) .
we therefore searched the spectroscopic database of the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) for objects with narrow emission lines with high - ionization line ratios and selected a few hundred type ii quasar candidates in the redshift range @xmath2 @xcite .
we have been conducting sensitive follow - up observations of the objects in this sample to determine their multi - wavelength properties .
we found that their ir and x - ray properties are consistent with their interpretation as powerful ( bolometric luminosity @xmath3 erg sec@xmath4 ) obscured ( hydrogen column densities @xmath5 @xmath6 ) agn @xcite . even though the direct emission from the nucleus is completely blocked by the obscuring material ,
some light emitted along other directions is scattered into our line of sight by electrons or dust particles in the host galaxy @xcite .
the scattering efficiency ( the ratio of the apparent luminosity due to scattering to the intrinsic luminosity ) is very poorly known , but some observations suggest that it can be as large as a few per cent @xcite . for an intrinsically luminous quasar
such scattering efficiency implies that the scattered light can make a significant contribution to the observed flux .
this contribution is very difficult to separate from the stellar light , since the scattered light can form complicated shapes in the plane of the sky .
imaging polarimetry helps resolve this ambiguity , but in the absence of such observations , spectropolarimetry or broad - band polarimetry allows one to determine the major direction of scattering and therefore indicates where in the galaxy most of the scattered light is coming from . in this contribution
we describe results of the imaging of nine type ii quasars using the advanced camera for surveys ( acs ) aboard the hubble space telescope ( hst ) , in combination with polarimetric data from ground - based observations .
we selected nine type ii agn with @xmath7([oiii]5007)@xmath8 from the samples by @xcite and @xcite in the redshift range @xmath0 .
based on the correlation between the narrow line luminosities and the broad - band luminosities that exists for unobscured quasars @xcite , we estimate that the intrinsic luminosities of the objects in our program are about @xmath1 .
to avoid contamination from the strongest emission lines ( [ oii]3727 , [ oiii]4959,5007 , h@xmath9 , h@xmath10 ) , we carefully chose redshifts and acs filters so that none of the filters used in our program contain any of these lines
. each object was imaged in three filters : ` blue ' ( blueward of the [ oii]3727 line ) , ` green ' ( between [ oii]3727 and h@xmath9 ) and ` red ' ( redward of the [ oiii]5007 emission line ) .
the three images were combined to produce color - composite images shown in figures [ fig_1 ] and [ fig_2 ] . within each figure ,
the filters , redshifts and image combining parameters were similar , so that the difference in colors of objects in the images reflect differences in their optical spectral energy distributions .
is marked with a solid black line , and grey lines mark the @xmath11 confidence limits if the uncertainty in the angle is significant . ] , except a different set of filters was used for these three objects .
polarimetric data are not available for sdss j1301@xmath120058 and sdss j1243@xmath120232 . ]
polarimetric or spectropolarimetric data were obtained for seven of the objects using the ccd spectropolarimeter ( spol ) at the 6.5 m multiple mirror telescope ( mmt ) and bok telescope .
the observed degrees of polarization vary from 1% to 10% ( in the green band ) , and the polarization position angles are indicated with solid lines ( marked ` @xmath13 ' ) in figures [ fig_1 ] and [ fig_2 ] . by fitting ellipses to the isophotes for each object in each band , we constructed one - dimensional brightness profiles and found that in most cases they are consistent with the de vaucouleurs law , except sdss j1106 + 0357 ( figure [ fig_2 ] ) which has a prominent exponential component in the outer parts .
once the best - fitting two - dimensional de vaucouleurs profile is subtracted off the image , significant deviations are revealed .
they are especially prominent in the blue band , and the brightest of them can be seen in figures [ fig_1]-[fig_2 ] as blue patches , either biconical ( as in sdss j1323 - 0159 ) or irregularly shaped ( as in sdss j1039 + 6430 ) .
we find that in most cases the line connecting the center of the galaxy and the brightest blue patch is orthogonal to the measured polarization position angle , and we therefore interpret these regions as emission from the obscured nucleus scattered into our line of sight by the material in the host galaxy .
notable exceptions include sdss j0920 + 4531 , in which the blue region near the center is misaligned with the scattering orientation as measured using spectropolarimetry .
given the overall morphology of the object which shows several components interacting with the main galaxy , it is likely that the bright blue patch near the center is just a starforming region rather than scattered light .
in this case , the scattering region can not be easily identified on the basis of morphology .
the example of sdss j0920 + 4531 shows that in the absence of polarimetric data , star formation in the host can not be easily distinguished from the scattered light contribution .
this difficulty is further underscored by the case of sdss j0123 + 0044 , where the ambiguity is not resolved even by the polarimetric data . in this object ,
several patches of blue surround the nucleus . while the brightest of them is orthogonal to the polarization position angle ( and therefore is likely to be scattered rather than stellar light ) , the fainter spots to the east of the nucleus lie on the extension of a faint thin structure which extends out to 30 kpc to the north of the galaxy ( this structure is too faint to be seen on figure [ fig_1 ] ) .
given this morphological connection with what looks like a tidal tail , the eastern spots are probably patches of star formation in a companion in the process of disruption .
scattered light can make a significant contribution to the broad - band fluxes of quasar host galaxies .
one striking example is sdss j1039 + 6430 , in which most of the blue emission is due to the scattered light , and the measured polarization reaches 17% in this band . scattering from different parts of the host galaxy can wash out the polarization signal , so that scattered light can be important even if the observed polarization is not very high . if one were to take the colors of the extended emission at face value to estimate the age of the stellar population in the host galaxy , the measured ages would be strongly biased toward small values .
as we demonstrated above , polarimetric data can help distinguish between scattered light and star formation , but does not eliminate the ambiguity entirely .
this difficulty may be even more severe in host studies of unobscured quasars , in which the presence of a very bright blue nuclear source can make a detailed morphological analysis difficult and can dilute the polarization signal .
our other findings include the presence of kpc - scale dust lanes across the centers of some host galaxies ( e.g. , sdss j1323@xmath120159 and sdss j0123 + 0044 ) , extended tidal structures in three of the objects in our sample , and faint companions within 20 projected kpc in each of the remaining six objects .
the statistical significance of these results will be addressed in our future work .
|
nlz is supported by a _ spitzer _
the observations reported here were obtained with the nasa / esa hubble space telescope and at the mmt observatory , a facility operated jointly by the smithsonian institution and the university of arizona .
public access time is available at the mmt observatory through an agreement with the national science foundation .
funding for the creation and distribution of the sdss archive has been provided by the alfred p. sloan foundation , the participating institutions , nasa , the nsf , the u.s .
department of energy , the japanese monbukagakusho , and the max planck society .
the sdss web site is http://www.sdss.org/. the sdss is managed by the astrophysical research consortium for the participating institutions .
the participating institutions are the university of chicago , fermilab , the institute for advanced study , the japan participation group , the johns hopkins university , the korean scientist group , los alamos national laboratory , the max - planck - institute for astronomy ( mpia ) , the max - planck - institute for astrophysics ( mpa ) , new mexico state university , university of pittsburgh , university of portsmouth , princeton university , the united states naval observatory , and the university of washington .
abazajian , k. , et al .
2005 , aj , 129 , 1755 antonucci , r.r.j . & miller , j.s .
1985 , apj , 297 , 621 hao , l. , et al .
2005 , aj , 129 , 1783 lacy , m. , et al .
2004 , apjs , 154 , 166 ptak , a. , zakamska , n.l . ,
strauss , m.a . ,
krolik , j.h . , heckman , t.m . ,
schneider , d.p . , & brinkmann , j. 2006 , apj , 637 , 147 szokoly , g.p .
, et al . 2004 , apjs , 155 , 271 urry , c.m . & padovani , p. 1995 , pasp , 107 , 803 york , d.g . , et al .
2000 , aj , 120 , 1579 zakamska , n.l . ,
2003 , aj , 126 , 2125 zakamska , n.l . ,
strauss , m.a . ,
heckman , t.m .
, ivezi , . , & krolik , j.h . 2004 , aj , 128 , 1002 zakamska , n.l . , et al . 2005 ,
aj , 129 , 1212
|
nlz supported by spitzer observations obtained with nasa / esa hubble space telescope mmt observatory operated by smithsonian institution university of arizona public access available at mmt observatory agreement with national science foundation funding for sdss archive provided by alfred p. sloan foundation participating institutions nasa nsf u.s . department of energy japanese monbukagakusho max planck society sdss web site http://www.sdss managed by astrophysical research consortium for participating institutions university of chicago fermilab institute for advanced study japan participation group johns hopkins university korean scientist group los alamos national laboratory - new mexico state university university of pittsburgh portsmouth princeton university united states naval observatory university of washington abazajian k. . 2005 129 , 1755 antonucci miller 1985 297 , 621 hao 2005 129 1783 lacy 2004 154 , 166 ptak zakamska strauss krolik heckman schneider brinkmann2006 apj 637, 147 szokoly g.p. 2004 apjs 155 , 271 urry padovani 1995 pasp 107 , 803 york d.g 2000 aj 120 , 1579 zakamska 2003 126 , 2125 zakamska strauss m.a heckman t.m krolik 2004 aj 128 , 1002 zakamska n.l 2005 aj 129 , 1212
| 0.130637
| 600
| 320
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
201,993
|
we estimate the magnitude of lepton flavour violation ( lfv ) from the phase of the neutrino yukawa matrix . in the minimal supersymmetric standard model with right - handed neutrinos ,
the lfv processes @xmath0 can appear through the slepton mixing , which comes from the renormalization group effect on the right - handed neutrino yukawa interaction between the grand unified theory scale and the heavy right - handed neutrino mass scale .
two types of phases exist in the neutrino yukawa matrix .
one is the majorana phase , which can change the magnitude of the lfv branching ratios by a few factor .
the other phases relate for the size of the yukawa hierarchy and its phase effect can change the lfv branching ratios by several orders of magnitude .
|
lepton flavour violation ( lfv)is an important signature into physics beyond the standard model ( sm ) . in the sm with massive neutrinos , neutrinos have the yukawa interaction .
lepton flavour is violated like quark flavour . however , lfv is strongly suppressed by the neutrino masses .
supersymmetry ( susy ) with massive neutrinos makes the situation drastically changed .
it can predict sizable lfv effects , because the alternative source of lfv is generated from the slepton mixing through the renormalization group effect on the right - handed neutrino yukawa interaction .
the lfv processes @xmath1 of charged lepton are being measured .
the meg experiment @xcite gives the upper bound on the @xmath2 process as @xmath3 the forthcoming experiment reaches to @xmath4 .
the @xmath5 decay processes are also measured at b - factories @xcite . on the other hand , it has been already discovered that lepton flavour is violated in the neutrino sector .
the oscillation parameters will be measured in detail . in this letter
, we study the phase of the neutrino yukawa matrix and investigate its effect on the magnitude of the lfv processes .
in the framework based on the see - saw mechanism , we can parameterize the neutrino yukawa matrix @xmath6 in terms of physical quantities as @xcite @xmath7 where @xmath8 is the vacuum expectation value of the higgs boson , @xmath9 is the observed maki - nakagawa - sakata ( mns ) matrix including two majorana phases @xmath10 ; i.e. , @xmath11 here we neglect the @xmath12 element of @xmath9 .
@xmath13 is the neutrino mass matrix and @xmath14 is the right - handed majorana neutrino mass matrix in each diagonal base .
an arbitrary complex orthogonal matrix @xmath15 is expressed as @xmath16 where @xmath17 and @xmath18 the elements @xmath19 give a drastic effect on structure of the yukawa matrix as hyperbolic functions .
we call @xmath20 as _ r - phase _ to distinguish it from the majorana phase
. in the following , we assume that the neutrino masses are _ approximately _ degenerate and the right - handed neutrino masses are degenerate @xmath21 where , @xmath22 and @xmath23 are the solar and atmospheric neutrino mass squared differences , @xmath24 is the size of right - handed neutrinos , and @xmath25 is undetermined light neutrino mass parameter . we then obtain the neutrino yukawa matrix @xmath6 in its diagonal base as @xmath26 where @xmath27 this expression indicates the characteristic relation @xmath28 among the neutrino yukawa couplings , which is similar to those of the quarks and the charged leptons @xmath29 . for @xmath30 and @xmath31 , @xmath32 is close to @xmath33 , so that the neutrino yukawa couplings become hierarchical .
the parameter @xmath32 is written in terms of the combination of _ r - phase _
( see eqs.([r1 ] ) and ( [ r2 ] ) ) , and it determines the size of the neutrino yukawa hierarchy .
we consider the susy models , especially the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) with right - handed neutrinos . in the slepton sector
, the mssm lagrangian has an alternative source of lfv through the following soft susy breaking terms , @xmath34 where @xmath35 are the slepton tri - linear couplings and @xmath36 are the soft mass parameters for the sleptons .
we assume that these couplings are universal at the grand unified theory ( gut ) scale ( @xmath37 ) , i.e. , @xmath38 in this framework , the lfv processes @xmath1 can appear due to the slepton mixing @xcite , which comes from the renormalization group effect on @xmath6 between the scales of @xmath37 and @xmath24 @xmath39 the branching ratios for these processes are expressed by @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the typical susy scale , @xmath42 is the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of higgs bosons , @xmath43 is the fine structure constant , and @xmath44 is fermi constant .
let us consider the @xmath32 dependence of lfv with @xmath45 , the effect of _ r - phase _ contributes to only @xmath2 process .
a comparison of each magnitude of lfv processes is already meaningless , and we plotted the branching ratio for @xmath46 process ( see figure [ br - r ] . ) , event for @xmath47 ( upper solid line ) and @xmath48 ( lower solid line ) .
the experimental upper limit from meg is also shown ( dashed line).,width=283 ] where we take @xmath49 , and @xmath50 .
the lfv branching ratio is approximately proportional to @xmath51 , so that a large value of @xmath32 can change the branching ratio by several orders of magnitude . on the other hand
, we show the dependence on the majorana phase @xmath52 ( see figure [ br - a ] . ) .
when @xmath45 , the branching ratio does not depend on @xmath53 .
event for @xmath54 ( upper solid line ) and @xmath55 ( lower solid line ) .
the upper limit is also shown ( dashed line).,width=283 ] figure [ br - a ] shows that the branching ratio is a periodic function on @xmath52 , and that the effect of majorana phase is smaller than that of @xmath32 .
we have analyzed the structure of the neutrino yukawa matrix and have discussed the magnitude of lfv processes from the phase effect on the neutrino yukawa matrix in the mssm with the right - handed neutrinos .
the neutrino yukawa matrix has two types of phases , majorana phases and _ r - phases_. in the case that neutrino masses are degenerate and the right - handed neutrino masses are degenerate , the eigenvalues of the neutrino yukawa matrix become hierarchical spectrum and the _ r - phases _ determine the size of yukawa hierarchy . in the susy models ,
sizable lfv can arise due to the slepton mixing from the renormalization group effect on the neutrino yukawa matrix between @xmath37 and @xmath24 .
the majorana phases can change the lfv branching ratios by a factor , and these magnitudes become periodic as the function of majorana phases . on the other hand ,
_ r - phases _ enhance the magnitude of the lfv branching ratios by several orders .
j. hisano , t. moroi , k. tobe and m. yamaguchi , phys .
d * 53 * , 2442 ( 1996 ) j. hisano , t. moroi , k. tobe , m. yamaguchi and t. yanagida , phys .
b * 357 * , 579 ( 1995 ) s. kanemura , k. matsuda , t. ota , t. shindou , e. takasugi and k. tsumura , arxiv : hep - ph/0409283 .
|
lepton flavour violation lfv important signature physics beyond standard model massive neutrinos yukawa interaction lepton flavour violated like quark flavour lfv suppressed by neutrino masses supersymmetry with massive neutrinos lfv effects alternative source from slepton mixing renormalization group effect right - handed neutrino yukawa interaction lfv processes @xmath1 charged lepton measured meg experiment @xcite upper bound @xmath2 process @xmath4 @xmath5 decay processes measured at b - factories @xcite discovered lepton flavour violated in neutrino sector oscillation parameters measured detail study neutrino yukawa matrix effect lfv processes parameterize neutrino yukawa matrix @xmath6 physical quantities @xmath7 @xmath8 vacuum expectation value higgs boson @xmath9 observed maki - nakagawa - sakata matrix two majorana phases @xmath10 @xmath13 neutrino mass matrix @xmath14 right - handed majorana neutrino mass matrix diagonal basearbitrary orthogonal matrix @xmath15 expressed @xmath16 @xmath17 elements @xmath19 structure yukawa matrix call @xmath20 r - phase _ majorana phase neutrino masses degenerate right - handed neutrino degenerate @xmath21 @xmath22 solar atmospheric neutrino mass differences @xmath24 size right - handed neutrinos light neutrino mass parameter neutrino yukawa matrix @xmath6 diagonal base @xmath26 @xmath27 indicates characteristic relation @xmath28 neutrino yukawa couplings similar quarks charged leptons @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath32 close to @xmath33 neutrino yukawa couplings hierarchical parameter @xmath32 r - phase _ determines size neutrino yukawa hierarchy consider susy models minimal supersymmetric standard model right - handed neutrinos slepton sector mssm lagrangian alternative source lfv susy terms @xmath34 @xmath35 slepton tri - linear couplings @xmath36 soft mass parameters sleptons couplings universal at grand unified theory scale @xmath37 )@xmath38 lfv processes @xmath1 due to slepton mixing @xcite renormalization group effect on @xmath6 between scales @xmath37 and @xmath24 @xmath39 branching ratios expressed by @xmath40 @xmath41 typical susy scale @xmath42 ratio vacuum expectation values higgs bosons @xmath43 fine structure constant @xmath44 fermi constant @xmath32 dependence of lfv with @xmath45 effect r - phase contributes to @xmath2 process comparison of each magnitude lfv processes meaningless plotted branching ratio for @xmath46 process figure @xmath47 @xmath48 experimental upper limit from meg shown @xmath49 @xmath50 lfv branching ratio proportional to @xmath51 large value of @xmath32 change branching ratio orders magnitude dependence on majorana phase @xmath52 figure @xmath45 branching ratio depend on @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 upper limit shown branching ratio periodic function on @xmath52 effect of majorana phase smaller than @xmath32analyzed structure neutrino yukawa matrix discussed magnitude lfv processes phase effect mssm right - handed neutrinos two phases majorana r - phases neutrino masses degenerate degenerate eigenvalues become hierarchical spectrum r - phases determine size yukawa hierarchy susy models sizable lfv due slepton mixing renormalization group effect between @xmath37 and @xmath24 majorana phases change lfv branching ratios factor , magnitudes become periodic function phases r - phases enhance magnitude lfv branching ratios several orders j. hisano t. moroi k. tobe m. yamaguchi . d * 53 * , 2442 ( 1996 ) 357 * , 579 ( 1995 ). kanemura matsuda t ota shindou takasugi tsumura arxiv hep - ph/0409283
| 0.26027
| 1,615
| 835
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,001
|
a heffter array @xmath0 is an @xmath1 matrix with nonzero entries from @xmath2 such that _ i _ ) each row contains @xmath3 filled cells and each column contains @xmath4 filled cells , _ ii _ ) every row and column sum to 0 , and _
iii _ ) no element from @xmath5 appears twice .
heffter arrays are useful in embedding the complete graph @xmath6 on an orientable surface where the embedding has the property that each edge borders exactly one @xmath7cycle and one @xmath8cycle .
archdeacon , boothby and dinitz proved that these arrays can be constructed in the case when @xmath9 , i.e every cell is filled . in this paper
we concentrate on square arrays with empty cells where every row sum and every column sum is @xmath10 in @xmath11 .
we solve most of the instances of this case .
_ dedicated to the memory of our friend and colleague scott vanstone .
_ + 05b30 , 05c10
|
a heffter array @xmath0 is an @xmath1 matrix with nonzero entries from @xmath2 such that 1 .
each row contains @xmath3 filled cells and each column contains @xmath4 filled cells , 2 . the elements in every row and column sum to 0 in @xmath2 , and 3 .
for every @xmath12 , either @xmath13 or @xmath14 appears in the array .
the notion of a heffter array @xmath0 was first defined by archdeacon in @xcite .
it is shown there that a heffter array with a pair of special orderings can be used to construct an embedding of the complete graph @xmath15 on a surface .
the connection is given in the following theorem .
[ heffter1]@xcite given a heffter array @xmath0 with compatible orderings @xmath16 of the symbols in the rows of the array and @xmath17 on the symbols in the columns of the array , then there exists an embedding of @xmath15 such that every edge is on a face of size @xmath3 and a face of size @xmath4 .
moreover , if @xmath16 and @xmath17 are both simple , then all faces are simple cycles .
we will not concern ourselves with the ordering problem in this paper and will just concentrate on the construction of the heffter arrays .
( in a subsequent paper ( see @xcite ) we will address the ordering problem in more detail . ) we refer the reader to @xcite for the definition of a simple ordering and the definition of compatible orderings .
theorem [ heffter1 ] can be stated in design theoretic terms .
a @xmath8cycle system on @xmath18 points is a decomposition of the edges of @xmath19 into @xmath8cycles .
a @xmath8cycle system @xmath20 on @xmath19 is _ cyclic _ if there is a labeling of the vertex set of @xmath19 with the elements of @xmath21 such that the permutation @xmath22 preserves the cycles of @xmath20 .
a biembedding of an @xmath7cycle system and a @xmath8cycle system is a face 2-colorable topological embedding of the complete graphs @xmath15 in which one color class is comprised of the cycles in the @xmath7cycle system and the other class contains the cycles in the @xmath8cycle system .
we refer the reader to @xcite for general information on @xmath8cycle systems , to @xcite for cyclic @xmath8cycle systems and to @xcite for information about biembedings of cycle systems .
while not using heffter arrays , @xcite and @xcite gives a related idea of embedding a single 2-fold triple system .
the following proposition about cycle systems follows from theorem [ heffter1 ] .
[ heffter - cycle ] assume there exists a heffter array @xmath0 with compatible orderings @xmath16 of the symbols in the rows of the array and @xmath17 on the symbols in the columns of the array such that @xmath16 and @xmath17 are both simple .
then there exists a biembedding of a cyclic @xmath7cycle system @xmath23 and a cyclic @xmath8cycle system @xmath24 both on @xmath25 points .
a heffter array is called an _ integer _
heffter array if condition 2 in the definition of heffter array above is strengthened so that the elements in every row and every column sum to zero in @xmath11 . in this paper
we will concentrate on constructing _ square integer _ heffter arrays . if the heffter array is square , then @xmath26 and necessarily @xmath27 .
so for the remainder of this paper define a heffter array @xmath28 to be an @xmath29 array of integers satisfying the following : 1 .
each row and each column contains @xmath30 filled cells , 2 . the symbols in every row and every column sum to 0 in @xmath11 , and 3 . for every element @xmath31 either @xmath13 or @xmath14 appears in the array . in @xcite the authors study the case where the heffter array has no empty cells . in that paper
it is shown that there is an _ integer _
@xmath32 if and only if @xmath33 and @xmath34 ( mod 4 ) and in general that there is an @xmath32 for all @xmath33 . a _ shiftable _ heffter array @xmath35 is defined to be a heffter array @xmath0 where every row and every column contain the same number of positive and negative numbers . from @xcite we have that there is an @xmath36 if and only if @xmath37 and @xmath18 are even .
the notation @xmath38 denotes a _
@xmath39 . in this paper
we extend the idea of shiftable to any array .
an @xmath40 array @xmath41 of integers ( possibly with empty cells ) is _ shiftable _ if each row and each column contains the same number of positive and negative numbers .
let @xmath41 be a shiftable array and @xmath13 a nonnegative integer .
if @xmath13 is added to each positive element and @xmath14 is added to each negative element , then all of the row and column sums remain unchanged .
let @xmath42 denote the array where @xmath13 is added to all the _ positive _ entries in @xmath41 and @xmath14 is added to all the _ negative _ entries .
if @xmath41 is an integer array , define the _ support _ of @xmath41 as the set containing the absolute value of the elements contained in @xmath41 .
so if @xmath41 is shiftable with support @xmath23 and @xmath13 a nonnegative integer , then @xmath43 has the same row and column sums as @xmath41 and has support @xmath44 . in the case of a shiftable heffter array @xmath45 , the array @xmath46 will have row and column sums equal to zero and support @xmath47 .
the following lemma gives necessary conditions for the existence of @xmath28 and @xmath45 .
[ necessary ] if there exists an @xmath28 , then necessarily @xmath48 ( mod 4 ) .
furthermore , if there exists an @xmath45 , then necessarily @xmath30 is even and @xmath49 ( mod 4 ) . given an @xmath28 , in order for each row to sum to zero , each row must contain an even number of odd numbers .
hence the entire array contains an even number of odd numbers .
now , the support of the @xmath28 is the set @xmath50 .
there will be an even number of odd numbers in @xmath23 exactly when @xmath48 ( mod 4 ) .
if there is an @xmath45 , then clearly @xmath30 must be even in order to have the same number of positive and negative entries in each row .
it follows that @xmath51 ( mod 4 ) , hence @xmath49 ( mod 4 ) . we give some examples of heffter arrays @xmath28 and @xmath45 .
[ ex1 ] the following are @xmath52 , @xmath53 and @xmath54 respectively .
-9 & 3 & 6 & + & -11 & 1 & 10 + 5 & & -7 & 2 + + 1 & & 18 & -9 & -10 + -6 & 2 & & 19 & -15 + -11&-12&3&&20 + 16&-7&-13&4 & + + & & -14&16&10&-12 + -1&3&&&17&-19 + 2&-4&&&-18&20 + 21&-23&-5&7 & & + -22&24&6&-8 & & + + -8&2&&&&27&-21 + -15&-16&3&&&&28 + 22&-9&-17&4 & & & + & 23&-10&-18&5 & & + & & 24&-11&-19&6 & + & & & 25&-12&-20&7 + + 3&-4&-6&8&11&-12 & & + & & -13&17&14&-19&-21&22 + & & 15&-16&-18&20&23&-24 + -33&34&&&-25&29&26&-31 + 35&-36&&&27&-28&-30&32 + 38&-43&-45&46&&&-37&41 + -42&44&47&-48&&&39&-40 + + in this paper we will prove the existence of heffter arrays @xmath28 for many of the possible values of @xmath18 and @xmath30 .
the paper is organized as follows . in section [ section2 ]
we cover the case when @xmath30 is even and in section [ section3 ] we deal with the case when @xmath55 ( mod 4 ) . in both of these cases
we prove that the necessary conditions from lemma [ necessary ] are sufficient . in section [ section4 ]
we consider the case when @xmath56 ( mod 4 ) . in this case
we do not get a complete solution , however we construct @xmath28 for many values of @xmath18 and @xmath30 .
the results are summarized in section [ section5 ] .
we give two direct constructions which both yield shiftable heffter arrays with an even number @xmath30 of cells per row and column . from lemma [ necessary ] , if @xmath57 ( mod 4 ) , then @xmath18 must be even , while if @xmath58 ( mod 4 ) , then any @xmath59 is possible .
we will construct heffter arrays in both of these cases .
the first construction covers the case when @xmath18 is even and the second one covers the case when @xmath18 is odd .
[ th1 ] there exists an @xmath45 for all @xmath60 even with @xmath61 . for @xmath62 let @xmath63 , @xmath64 and @xmath65 be @xmath66 arrays defined by @xmath67 [ cols="^,^",options="header " , ] & dne&dne +
much of this research was done at the university of queensland while the second and fourth authors were visiting ( at separate times ) .
we thank the ethel raybould visiting fellowship and the turkish science foundation 2219 program for providing funds for these visits .
m.j . grannell and t.s .
designs and topology . in surveys in combinatorics 2007 ,
a. hilton and j. talbot , eds .
london mathematical society lecture note series , 346 .
cambridge , uk : cambridge university press , ( 2007 ) , 121 @xmath68 174 .
|
heffter array @xmath0 is @xmath1 matrix nonzero entries from @xmath2 each row contains @xmath3 cells column @xmath4 cells elements in row column sum to 0 in @xmath2 every @xmath12 @xmath13 or @xmath14 appears heffter array @xmath0 defined by archdeacon in @xcite heffter array with special orderings construct embedding complete @xmath15 on surface connection in theorem heffter array @xmath0 with compatible orderings @xmath16 symbols rows @xmath17 columns embedding of @xmath15 every edge on face @xmath3 @xmath4 if @xmath16 and @xmath17 simple all faces are simple cycles ordering problem concentrate on construction heffter arrays subsequent paper ordering refer reader to @xcite for definition of simple ordering compatible orderings theorem heffter1 design theoretic terms @xmath8cycle system on @xmath18 points decomposition of edges of @xmath19 into @xmath8cycles@xmath8cycle system @xmath20 on @xmath19 cyclic if labeling vertex set @xmath19 with elements @xmath21 permutation @xmath22 preserves cycles @xmath20 biembedding of @xmath7cycle and @xmath8cycle system is face 2-colorable topological embedding of complete graphs @xmath15 one color class cycles other refer to @xcite for information @xmath8cycle systems cyclic systems biembedings not using @xcite idea embedding single 2-fold triple system proposition about cycle systems from theorem heffter1 ] heffter array @xmath0 with compatible orderings @xmath16 symbols rows @xmath17 columns simple biembedding of cyclic @xmath7cycle system @xmath23 and cyclic @xmath8cycle system @xmath24 on @xmath25 points heffter array integer heffter array if condition 2 strengthened elements in every row column sum to zero in @xmath11 concentrate on constructing square integer heffter arrays if heffter array square @xmath26 and @xmath27 define heffter array @xmath28 to @xmath29 array of integers satisfyingrow column contains @xmath30 filled cells symbols sum to 0 in @xmath11 element @xmath31 @xmath13 or @xmath14 appears in array @xcite heffter array no empty cells integer @xmath32 if @xmath33 @xmath34 ( 4 @xmath32 for all @xmath33 shiftable heffter array @xmath35 @xmath0 row column contain same positive negative numbers @xcite @xmath36 if @xmath37 @xmath18 even @xmath38 denotes @xmath39 idea shiftable to any array @xmath40 array @xmath41 of integers with empty cells shiftable if row column contains same positive negative numbers @xmath41 shiftable array @xmath13 nonnegative integer if @xmath13 added to positive @xmath14 negative element row column sums remain unchanged @xmath42 array @xmath13 added to positive entries @xmath41 @xmath14 added negative if @xmath41 integer array define support _ of @xmath41 as set containing absolute value of elements@xmath41 shiftable support @xmath23 nonnegative integer @xmath43 same row column sums @xmath41 @xmath44 shiftable heffter array @xmath45 array @xmath46 row column sums equal to zero support @xmath47 lemma conditions @xmath28 @xmath45 @xmath28 @xmath48 ( mod 4 ) @xmath45 @xmath30 even @xmath49 ( mod 4 ) @xmath28 each row sum zero even odd numbers entire array contains even odd numbers support @xmath28 set @xmath50 even odd numbers in @xmath23 @xmath48 ( mod 4 ) @xmath45 @xmath30 even same positive negative entries each row @xmath51 ( mod 4 ) @xmath49 ( mod 4 ) examples of heffter arrays @xmath28 @xmath45 @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54-9 3 6 + -11 1 10 + 5 -7 2 + + 1 18 -9 -10 + -6 2 19 -15 + -11&-12&3 + 16&-7&-13&4 -14&16&10&-12 + -1&3&-19 + 2&-4&20 21&-23&-5&7 -22&24&6&-8 -8&2&-21 + -15&-16&3 + 22&-9&-17&4 23&-10&-18&5 24&-11&-19&6 25&-12&-20&7 3&-4&-6&8&11&-12 -13&17&14&-19&-21&22 15&-16&-18&20&23&-24 + -33&34&29&26&-31 + 35&-36&-28&-30&32 38-43&-45&46-37&41 -42&44&47-48&-40 prove heffter arrays @xmath28 values @xmath18 @xmath30 organized section2 @xmath30 even @xmath55 mod 4 ) necessary conditions @xmath56 ( mod 4 ) solution construct @xmath28 for values @xmath18 @xmath30 results summarized section5 two direct constructions yield shiftable heffter arrays even number @xmath30 cells per row columnlemma @xmath57 mod 4 ) @xmath18 even @xmath58 mod 4 ) any @xmath59 possible construct heffter arrays cases first construction covers @xmath18 even second @xmath18 odd @xmath45 for @xmath60 even with @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 be @xmath66 arrays defined by @xmath67 research university of queensland second fourth authors visiting thank ethel raybould fellowship turkish science foundation 2219 program funds m.j . grannell t.s . designs topology surveys combinatorics 2007 a. hilton j. talbot london mathematical society lecture note series 346 cambridge cambridge university press 2007 121 @xmath68 174
| 0.349851
| 2,500
| 1,401
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,006
|
while yields of @xmath0 have been measured in many different colliding systems , no measurements exist in high energy nuclear collisions @xcite .
it also remains unexplored whether the relative yields of @xmath0 and @xmath1 change in collisions of heavy ions where a dense medium may permit alternate production mechanisms , such as quark coalescence @xcite .
the star detector at rhic is able to reconstruct the electromagnetic @xmath0 decay into @xmath1 plus @xmath2 via the weak decay of the @xmath1 and @xmath2 conversions into e@xmath3e@xmath4 pairs in the detector material .
we report here on our measurement of the ratio @xmath5 in minimum bias 200 gev d+au collisions .
we also compare the measured ratio to expectations from various models .
|
physics experiments at colliders have mapped production of strange hadron species over a variety of systems and energies .
such measurements have commonly included production of the @xmath1 but , due to the complexities of its observation , rarely the @xmath0 .
these two hyperons share the same quark content , differing only in isospin and mass , separated by a mere 77 mev / c@xmath6 @xcite . reconstructing the @xmath0
requires reconstructing the @xmath1 , so comparing the ratio of yields of the two species will be exclusive of its feed - down from @xmath0 decays , but contributions from resonance decays into both species will be included . ] provides a simple test of whether conditions are different for these two similarly - composed hyperons .
are they produced similarly ?
are their final state interactions the same ? without measurements , these traits may only be assumed . above threshold energies for production of @xmath0 , the experimental data for the value of the ratio @xmath5 cluster around 1/3 , matching the ratio of isospin degeneracy factors ( @xmath7 ) of the @xmath8 and @xmath1 ground states ( @xmath9=3 , @xmath10=1 ) , as will be shown later in this paper .
however there are absences in measurements for hadronic collisions at moderate to high energies , and for collisions of sizable nuclei .
high energy nuclear collisions are of particular interest for the possibility of opening new channels of production via partonic degrees of freedom @xcite .
models often start with the production of all particles , followed by the rapid decay of resonance states .
both the @xmath1 and @xmath0 receive contributions from decays of strange resonances , but those feeding the @xmath1 are much more numerous .
knowledge of these contributions is pertinent to understanding the full picture , and efforts to measure these are underway @xcite .
= 5.0 in the predictions for @xmath5 from a variety of particle production models are as follows : the event generator hijing / b@xmath11 @xcite gives 0.37 for @xmath12 gev d+au collisions ; the thermus @xcite statistical thermal model gives 0.36 at @xmath13 mev , @xmath14 ; the sudden hadronization " @xcite thermal model gives @xmath150.33 at @xmath13 mev ; and the alcor @xcite quark coalescence model gives 0.20 .
both thermal models feature little sensitivity to input parameters , as seen in figure [ fi : ratiocont ] and elsewhere @xcite , with nearly no dependence upon chemical potentials . though there is some spread in the predicted values
, it should be noted that the @xmath16 @xmath17 ( taken from direct production before resonance contributions ) is much higher .
so the final value of @xmath5 may reflect even more upon resonance yields than the direct production of @xmath1 and @xmath0 .
for example , quark coalescence treats the @xmath1 and @xmath0 equally : the entirety of their difference then results from the copious resonances @xcite .
thermal models place a penalty on production of more massive states , so they begin with a primordial value below that of quark coalescence , but have less resonance contributions to drop the final ratio .
the star detector is capable of reconstructing the decay @xmath18 with excellent signal - to - noise @xcite .
reconstruction of photon conversions ( @xmath19 e@xmath3e@xmath4 ) in detector material can be accomplished similarly @xcite , the validity of which is underscored by the ability to visualize the structure of detector material from identified conversion points as seen in figure [ fi : svt](left ) .
focusing on low transverse momentum ( @xmath20 ) photons then provides sufficient resolution to identify @xmath0 through invariant mass of @xmath21 pairs when combinatoric backgrounds are adequately low , shown in figure [ fi : svt](right ) . to extract a yield , the shape of the background under the invariant mass peak
is obtained by rotating candidate @xmath1 and @xmath2 daughters from same events to avoid mixing event classes .
preliminary signals for @xmath0 have been observed via this technique in @xmath22 gev p+p collisions , as well as @xmath23 and 200 gev cu+cu collisions at rhic , but we concentrate here on minimum bias 200 gev d+au collisions .
= 2.4 in = 2.3 in
by using the same @xmath1 candidates in both numerator and denominator of @xmath5 , efficiencies for finding the @xmath1 cancel out and we are left with three main corrections .
the first is weak decay feed - downs from doubly or triply strange hadrons , which is essentially an issue for @xmath1 only .
based on preliminary analyses of @xmath1 , @xmath24 , and @xmath25 in minimum bias 200 gev d+au data in star , approximately 20% of the @xmath1 candidates at all @xmath20 come from such feed - down @xcite .
= 3.1 in the second and third correction factors are the conversion probability of photons in detector material and the reconstruction efficiency of those conversions .
these are obtained via embedding simulated @xmath0 decays into real data .
the conversion probability is difficult to determine accurately as it involves simulating every possible conversion volume properly , but there seems to be rather little dependence on the @xmath20 of the parent @xmath0 .
in contrast , the reconstruction efficiency drops rapidly with decreasing parent @xmath20 , due mostly to reduced acceptance for low @xmath20 electrons ( which are found only for conversions in the gas volume of the star tpc ) . to improve statistics , we exploit the expectation that @xmath26 and sum baryon+antibaryon counts under the assumption @xmath27 . as the number of reconstructed counts are still small and bounded by zero yield , the errors are large and asymmetric .
determination of the measured ratio thus involves a monte carlo allowing values to vary appropriately within their combined statistical and systematic errors , and we report the most probable value with errors determined by the rms of outcomes above and below it .
we reconstruct sufficient numbers of @xmath0 to determine @xmath5 with significance in two @xmath20 bins from minimum bias 200 gev d+au ( @xmath28 ) .
we find preliminary @xmath5 = @xmath29 for @xmath0 @xmath20 = 2.5 - 3.5 gev / c , and @xmath30 for @xmath0 @xmath20 = 3.5 - 4.5 gev / c .
combining the two bins leads to @xmath5 = @xmath31 and this is shown along with past experiment results in figure [ fi : pastres ] .
we also find @xmath32 , which does not discount the summation of baryons+antibaryons for our ratio .
the large error bars on @xmath5 prevent definitive model differentiation , but the low value suggests that strong resonance contributions are prevalent even in d+au collisions .
11 albrecht h ( argus collaboration ) 1987 _ phys .
_ b * 183 * 419 + bogolyubsky m y @xmath33 @xmath34 1986 _ yad .
fiz . _ * 43 * 1199 + bogolyubsky m y @xmath33 @xmath34 1989 _ yad .
fiz . _ * 50 * 683 + eisenstein r a ( ps185 collaboration ) 1994 _ phys . atom .
nucl . _ * 57 * 1680 + sullivan m w @xmath33 @xmath34 1987 _ phys .
_ d * 36 * 674 + baldini a @xmath33 @xmath34 1988 _ total cross - sections for reactions of high - energy particles _ vol 12 ed madelung o ( berlin : springer , landolt - brnstein ) + acciarri m @xmath33 @xmath34 ( l3 collaboration ) 1994 _ phys .
_ b * 328 * 223 + acciarri m @xmath33 @xmath34 ( l3 collaboration ) 2000 _ phys .
b * 479 * 79 + sewerin s @xmath33 @xmath34 ( cosy-11 collaboration ) 1999 _ phys .
lett . _ * 83 * 682 + kowina p @xmath33 @xmath34 ( cosy-11 collaboration ) 2004 _ proc .
tenth int . conf . on hadron spectroscopy ( aschaffenburg ) _ vol 1 ( secaucus , heidelberg : springer ) 852 + ( kowina p @xmath33 @xmath34 ( cosy-11 collaboration ) 2004 _ preprint _ nucl - ex/0401020 ) + yuldashev b s @xmath33 @xmath34 ( fnal-343 collaboration ) 1991 _ phys . rev . _
d * 43 * 2792 bir t s and zimnyi j 1983 _ nucl .
phys . _ a * 395 * 525 eidelman s @xmath33 @xmath34 2004 _ phys .
_ b * 592 * 1 koch p , rafelski j , and greiner w 1983 _ phys .
_ b * 123 * 151 koch p and rafelski j 1985 _ nucl .
a * 444 * 678 markert c 2005 _ j. phys .
g : nucl . part .
phys . _ * 31 * s897 vance s e , gyulassy m , wang x n 1998 _ phys .
b * 443 * 45 wheaton s and cleymans j 2005 _ j. phys .
g : nucl . part .
phys . _ * 31 * s1069 letessier j and rafelski j 2002 _ hadrons and quark gluon plasma _
cambridge monographs on particle physics , nuclear physics , and cosmology ( cambridge ; new york : cambridge university press ) bir t s , lvai p , and zimnyi j 1995 _ phys .
_ b * 347 * 6 lvai p 2004 _ private communications _ adler c @xmath33 @xmath34 ( star collaboration ) 2002 _ phys .
* 89 * 092301 adams j @xmath33 @xmath34 ( star collaboration ) 2004 _ phys .
_ c * 70 * 044902 cai x ( star collaboration ) 2005 _ j. phys .
g : nucl . part .
* 31 * s1015
|
experiments at colliders mapped production hadron species over systems energies measurements included production @xmath1 rarely @xmath0 two hyperons share same quark content in isospin mass separated by 77 mev / c@xmath6 reconstructing @xmath0 requires @xmath1 comparing yields exclusive feed - down @xmath0 decays contributions from resonance decays included test conditions for two hyperons produced final state interactions same ? without measurements traits assumed above threshold energies production @xmath0 experimental data ratio @xmath5 cluster around 1/3 matching ratio isospin degeneracy factors @xmath8 @xmath1 ground states absences in measurements for hadronic collisions at moderate to high energies collisions sizable nuclei high energy nuclear collisions new channels production via partonic degrees freedom models start production particles followed rapid decay resonance states @xmath1 and @xmath0 receive contributions from decays strange resonances feeding @xmath1 more numerous knowledge of contributions pertinent to full picture efforts to measure underway5.0 predictions for @xmath5 from particle production models event generator gives 0.37 for @xmath12 gev d+au collisions thermus statistical model gives 0.36 at @xmath13 mev sudden hadronization model gives.33 at @xmath13 mev alcor quark coalescence model gives 0.20 thermal models feature little sensitivity to input parameters no dependence upon chemical potentials values @xmath16 @xmath17 direct production before resonance contributions higher final value of @xmath5 may reflect resonance yields than production @xmath1 @xmath0 quark coalescence treats @xmath1 @xmath0 equally difference results from copious resonances thermal models penalty on production of massive states begin with primordial value below quark coalescence less resonance contributions star detector decay @xmath18 with signal - to - noise @xcite reconstruction of photon conversions @xmath19@xmath3e@xmath4 in detector material structure detector material from conversion points figureon low transverse momentum @xmath20 photons provides identify @xmath0 invariant mass @xmath21 pairs when backgrounds low in figure shape background under invariant mass peak obtained by rotating @xmath1 @xmath2 daughters from same events avoid mixing classes signals for @xmath0 observed in @xmath22 gev p+p collisions @xmath23 200 gev cu+cu collisions at rhic concentrate on minimum bias 200 gev d+au collisions using same @xmath1 candidates in @xmath5 efficiencies @xmath1 cancel out three corrections first is weak decay feed - downs from strange hadrons issue for @xmath1 analyses minimum bias 200 gev d+au data 20% @xmath1 candidates at from such feed - down second third correction factors conversion probability of photons in detector material reconstruction efficiency obtained embedding simulated @xmath0 decays into real data conversion probability difficult little dependence on @xmath20 parent @xmath0 reconstruction efficiency drops with decreasing parent @xmath20 to reduced acceptance for low @xmath20 electrons starimprove statistics exploit expectation @xmath26 sum baryon+antibaryon counts assumption @xmath27 reconstructed counts small zero yield errors large asymmetric determination measured ratio involves monte carlo values vary statistical errors report probable value errors outcomes reconstruct numbers @xmath0 determine @xmath5 significance two @xmath20 bins minimum bias 200 gev d+au @xmath28 preliminary @xmath5 = @xmath29 @xmath0 2.5 - 3.5 gev / c @xmath30 @xmath0 = 3.5 - 4.5 gev / c combining bins leads @xmath5 = @xmath31 shown experiment results figure find @xmath32 discount summation baryons+antibaryons ratio large error bars @xmath5 prevent model differentiation low value suggests strong resonance contributions prevalent d+au collisions albrecht h argus collaboration 1987 phys . 183 * 419 bogolyubsky @xmath33 @xmath34 1986 1199 1989 683 eisenstein r 1994 phys 1680 sullivan @xmath33 1987d 36 * 674 baldini a 1988 cross - sections high - energy particles vol 12 berlin springer landolt brnstein acciarri m 1994 phys b 328 * 223 acciarri m 2000 phys b 479 * 79 sewerin s 1999 . 83 * 682 kowina p 2004 tenth int conf. hadron spectroscopy aschaffenburg vol 1 secaucus heidelberg springer 852 kowina p 2004 preprint nucl ex/0401020 yuldashev b fnal-343 collaboration 1991 phys . rev d * 43 * 2792 bir t s zimnyi j 1983 * 395 * 525 eidelman s 2004 phys . b * 592 * 1 koch p rafelski j greiner w 1983 phys 123 * 151 koch p rafelski j 1985 * 444 * 678 markert c 2005 31 * s897 vance s gyulassy m wang x 1998 b * 443 * 45 wheaton s cleymans j 2005 nucl31 s1069 letessier rafelski 2002 hadrons quark gluon plasma cambridge monographs particle physics nuclear physics cosmology cambridge university press bir t s lvai zimnyi 1995 phys . 347 6 lvai 2004 private communications adler @xmath33 star collaboration 2002 89 092301 adams collaboration 2004 phys 70 044902 star collaboration 2005 . nucl 31 s1015
| 0.352597
| 2,423
| 1,229
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,010
|
the study of multiparticle dynamics in hadron - hadron collisions at tevatron and lhc could provide useful information on new physics in addition to the expected signatures on the transverse plane .
we suggest that an analysis of inclusive correlations between emitted particles in @xmath0 inelastic collisions , and factorial moments of multiplicity distributions , may be helpful in uncovering ( un)particles from hidden sectors , using underlying events tagged by hard products like high-@xmath1 leptons and photons , and applying stringent selection criteria like event shape variables , etc .
address = departamento de fsica terica and ific , university of valencia - csic + dr .
moliner , 50 46100 burjassot , spain
|
multiparticle hadroproduction has been extremely useful along decades to understand the strong interaction dynamics @xcite . in ref.@xcite
we explored the possibility of applying well - known techniques based on inclusive correlations and moments of multiplicity distributions to the quest for a hidden sector ( hs ) at tevatron / lhc experiments . in all fairness ,
multiparticle production is still not fully understood , while our proposal is based on possible departures of @xmath2anomalous from @xmath2standard events .
nonetheless , one might expect that , once stringent selection criteria are applied to events , distinctive features associated to a hs would become useful in the search strategy and subsequent interpretation of new phenomena in multiparticle dynamics . in this work we focus on unparticle physics @xcite in particular , though the main ideas can be generally applied to hidden valley models @xcite . in these models ,
the standard model ( sm ) is accompanied by a hs of new particles not been yet observed due to typically an energetic barrier or a weak coupling to sm particles .
we will assume further that particles coming from a hs can decay back to sm particles @xcite , thereby modifying the conventional pattern of the parton cascade in multiparticle production .
so far most signatures of new physics ( like jets , missing energy , high-@xmath1 leptons or photons , displaced vertices ) have been considered on the transverse plane with respect to the beam direction . in a complementary way
, we advocate that a new stage of matter might also show up in _ soft _ physics of underlying events _ tagged by hard products _ , e.g. through particle ( pseudo)-rapidity correlations ( either integrated or not ) .
collisions , subsequently decaying into final - state sm particles through cluster formation .
the number of unparticles sources at the onset of the cascade may fluctuate , and a large ( and @xmath2continuously variable )
mass of the unparticle stuff would induce additional long - range correlations among the final - state sm particles . ]
experimental results in multibody production along decades have steadily supported the tendency of produced particles to merge into correlated groups @xcite .
this experimental evidence has traditionally led to the view of a two - step process for high - energy hadron collisions . the resulting multiplicity distribution is thus given by the convolution for particle emission sources ( strings , clusters / clans , fireballs ... ) with the decay / fragmenting distribution of sources .
however , observable consequences could derive from a new stage of matter ( stemming from a hs ) generated at the onset of the parton shower ( see fig.1 ) leading to a 3-step scenario in hadronic collisions at very high energy .
the inclusive 2-particle ( rapidity ) correlation function is defined as @xmath3 where @xmath4 denotes the inelastic @xmath0 cross section and subscripts 1 and 2 refer to the two considered particles event by event .
@xmath5 is usually split in two terms : @xmath6 where the short - range ( sr ) part is generally assumed to be more sensitive to dynamical correlations , while @xmath7 stands for long - range ( lr ) correlations usually due to the mixing of different topologies . in this work
we focus on the central rapidity region . according to our study @xcite , the @xmath7 piece in eq.(2 )
should become enhanced in a 3-step scenario wrt a standard 2-step cascade as a consequence of larger fluctuations of the number ( and mass ) of the primary sources of partons .
in addition , the correlation length in the @xmath8 term should become larger because of the ( presumably ) higher mass of the intermediate hidden ( un)particle stuff . therefore longer and
stronger correlations between particles can be expected from both sr and lr terms in eq.(2 ) whenever a hs appears in the cascade .
nevertheless , other conventional sources of possible lr effects in multiparticle production @xcite should be properly taken into account .
-scaling for @xmath9 ( upwards ) , in 2-step ( dotted lines ) and 3-step ( solid lines ) cascades ; middle : @xmath10 versus @xmath11 for 2-step and 3-step cascades ; right : @xmath12 versus @xmath11 setting @xmath13 , @xmath14 ( @xmath15 , @xmath16 ) in a 2-step ( 3-step ) cascade , respectively .
see @xcite for more details.,title="fig : " ] -scaling for @xmath9 ( upwards ) , in 2-step ( dotted lines ) and 3-step ( solid lines ) cascades ; middle : @xmath10 versus @xmath11 for 2-step and 3-step cascades ; right : @xmath12 versus @xmath11 setting @xmath13 , @xmath14 ( @xmath15 , @xmath16 ) in a 2-step ( 3-step ) cascade , respectively .
see @xcite for more details.,title="fig : " ] -scaling for @xmath9 ( upwards ) , in 2-step ( dotted lines ) and 3-step ( solid lines ) cascades ; middle : @xmath10 versus @xmath11 for 2-step and 3-step cascades ; right : @xmath12 versus @xmath11 setting @xmath13 , @xmath14 ( @xmath15 , @xmath16 ) in a 2-step ( 3-step ) cascade , respectively .
see @xcite for more details.,title="fig : " ] fluctuations in small phase space regions ( intermittency ) have been commonly described by the scaled moments @xmath17 of a multiplicity distribution @xmath18 ( corresponding to the normalized phase - space integral over the @xmath11-particle density function ) as the rapidity interval under study @xmath19 is split into @xmath20 bins of equal size @xmath21 @xcite . on the other hand , the fractality nature of multiparticle hadroproduction
is deeply connected with intermittent behaviour exhibiting a power - law dependence of the multiplicity moments with the cell size @xcite .
if self - similar dynamical fluctuations exist , @xmath17 should obey a power - law increase ( @xmath20-scaling ) at small @xmath22 , i.e. @xmath23 where the @xmath2intermittency exponents
@xmath24 ( @xmath25 ) are related to the anomalous fractal dimensions @xmath10 @xcite as @xmath26 moreover , the power scaling between @xmath27 and @xmath28 ( @xmath29-scaling ) , @xmath30^{\beta_q}\ \
\ln{f_q}(m)=\beta_q\ln{f_2}(m)\ ] ] represents another interesting relation , where the @xmath12 coefficient can be expressed as @xmath31 monofractality ( @xmath32 , @xmath33 ) implies that @xmath34 , which can be tested from ( 5 ) .
brax and peschanski @xcite proposed a better approximation than eq.([eq : beta ] ) using a lvy stable law description of multiparticle production : @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the lvy index ( also known as the degree of multifractality ) which permits an estimation of the cascading rate ; @xmath36 should be in principle restricted to the interval @xmath37 ( region of stability ) with @xmath38 characterizing monofractal behaviour .
instead of the law expressed in eq.([eq : levy ] ) , @xmath12 has been parametrized in the ginzburg - landau model of phase transitions as @xmath39 where @xmath40 now implies monofractality .
the motivation for all these approaches in heavy - ion collisions comes from the need of a signal for quark - gluon plasma formation through , e.g. , a ( second - order ) phase - transition , since the correlation length would then diverge , and the system behave as a simple fractal @xcite .
we are certainly not considering here such kind of phase - transition , but extra lr correlations from a hs leading to a similar effect on both @xmath36 and @xmath41 estimators . indeed our results shown in fig.2 are consistent with the interpretation that multiparticle production including a hs approaches monofractality ; the intermittency exponents , all @xmath10 values and @xmath36 and @xmath41 estimators turn out to be smaller in a 3-step scenario than in a 2-step cascade .
let us finally note that the ( shannon ) entropy , defined for a multiplicity distribution @xmath18 as @xmath42 @xcite , might become another indicator of a hs in multiparticle production . for example , it is relevant to verify to what extent entropy is additive @xcite by checking whether @xmath43 using particles belonging to regions @xmath44 and @xmath45 well separated in rapidity space ( e.g. forward and backward hemispheres ) .
intermittency and ( multi)fractality can be sensitive to a hs altering the pattern of the parton cascade in high - energy inelastic @xmath0 collisions . from our study in @xcite
we conclude that longer and stronger correlations between emitted particles , and larger scaled moments in multiplicity distributions , should be expected than in a conventional qcd cascade , while the pattern of the multiparticle system approaches monofractality - or merely becomes less fractal .
the challenge remains however in tagging those _ anomalous _ underlying events ( where such new phenomena would show up through soft physics ) by appropriate selection cuts , to be compared with a control sample of standard events .
more work requiring prior tuning and monte carlo generation of events at lhc energies is required before drawing any conclusion about the feasibility of our proposal .
|
multiparticle hadroproduction useful understand interaction dynamics @xcite explored applying techniques inclusive correlations multiplicity distributions to hidden sector hs ) at tevatron / lhc experiments multiparticle production not fully understood proposal based on departures @xmath2anomalous from @xmath2standard events stringent selection criteria distinctive features hs useful in search strategy interpretation new phenomena multiparticle dynamics focus on unparticle physics @xcite ideas applied to hidden valley models @xcite standard model sm ) accompanied by hs of new particles energetic barrier weak coupling sm particles from hs can decay back to sm particles @xcite modifying pattern parton cascade multiparticle production signatures of new physics like jets missing energy high-@xmath1 leptons photons displaced vertices considered on transverse plane beam direction advocate new stage of matter might show up in soft physics events through particle pseudo)-rapidity correlations collisions decaying into final - state sm particles through cluster formationunparticles sources at onset cascade may fluctuate large variable mass unparticle long - range correlations among final - state sm particles experimental results multibody production supported particles to merge into groups led to two - step process for high - energy hadron collisions multiplicity distribution given by convolution particle emission sources with decay fragmenting distribution consequences could from new stage of matter at onset parton shower leading to 3-step scenario in hadronic collisions at high energy inclusive 2-particle rapidity correlation function defined as @xmath3 @xmath4 denotes inelastic @xmath0 cross section 1 2 refer to two particles @xmath5 split in two terms short - range part sensitive to dynamical correlations @xmath7 for long - range correlations mixing focus on central rapidity region @xmath7 piece in eq.(2 ) should enhanced in 3-step scenario larger fluctuations of mass primary sources partons correlation length in @xmath8 term should larger higher mass of intermediate hidden un)particle stuff longer stronger correlations between particles expected from sr and lr terms in eq.(2 ) hs appears in cascade other conventional sources lr effects in multiparticle production -scaling for @xmath9 upwards in 2-step dotted lines 3-step solid lines ) cascades middle @xmath10 versus @xmath11 right @xmath12 versus @xmath11 @xmath13 see @xcite for details -scaling for @xmath9 upwards 2-step dotted 3-step solid lines cascades middle @xmath10 versus @xmath11 right @xmath12 versus @xmath13 see @xcite details -scaling for @xmath9 upwards 2-step dotted lines 3-step solid lines cascades middle @xmath10 versus @xmath11 right @xmath12 versus @xmath11 @xmath13 @xmath14 see @xcite details fluctuations in small phase space regions ( intermittency ) described by scaled moments @xmath17 of multiplicity distribution @xmath18 normalized phase - space integral over @xmath11-particle density function ) rapidity interval under study @xmath19 split into @xmath20 bins equal size @xmath21 @xcitefractality of multiparticle hadroproduction connected with intermittent behaviour power - law dependence multiplicity moments with cell size @xcite if dynamical fluctuations @xmath17 obey power - law increase-scaling at small @xmath22 @xmath2intermittency exponents @xmath24 @xmath25 related to anomalous fractal dimensions @xmath10 power scaling between @xmath27 and @xmath28-scaling @xmath30= represents relation @xmath12 coefficient expressed as @xmath31 monofractality implies @xmath34 approximation lvy stable law description of multiparticle production @xmath35 @xmath36 is lvy index degree of multifractality estimation cascading rate @xmath36 restricted to interval @xmath37 region of stability @xmath38 monofractal behaviour @xmath12 parametrized in - landau model as @xmath39 @xmath40 implies monofractality motivation for approaches in heavy - ion collisions from need signal for quark - gluon plasma formationsecond - order phase - transition correlation length system as simple fractal @xcite not considering phase - transition extra lr correlations from hs similar effect on @xmath36 @xmath41 estimators results in fig.2 consistent with multiparticle production hs approaches monofractality intermittency exponents @xmath10 values @xmath36 estimators smaller in 3-step scenario than 2-step cascade shannon ) entropy might indicator of hs in multiparticle production relevant to verify entropy additive @xcite checking @xmath43 particles regions @xmath44 @xmath45 separated in rapidity space intermittency multi)fractality sensitive to hs altering pattern parton cascade in high - energy inelastic @xmath0 collisions study longer stronger correlations between emitted particles larger scaled moments in multiplicity distributions expected conventional qcd cascade multiparticle system approaches monofractality less fractal challenge tagging anomalous underlying events by selection cuts compared with control sample standard events more work prior tuning monte carlo generation at lhc energies required before conclusion feasibility proposal
| 0.319494
| 2,097
| 1,061
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,028
|
we investigate the behaviour of stochastic differential equations , especially burgers eq . , by means of monte - carlo - techniques . by analysis of the produced configurations ,
we show that direct and often intuitive insight into the fundamentals of the solutions to the underlying equation , like shock wave formation , intermittency and chaotic dynamics , can be obtained .
we also demonstrate that very natural constraints for the lattice parameters are sufficient to ensure stable calculations for unlimited numbers of monte - carlo - steps .
|
hydrodynamic turbulence remains a basically unsolved problem of modern physics .
this is especially noticeable as the fundamentals seem to be fairly easy the navier - stokes - equations for the velocity and pressure fields @xmath0 and @xmath1 , @xmath2 with the additional constraint @xmath3 express the conservation of momentum in a classical , newtonian , incompressible fluid of viscosity @xmath4 and density @xmath5 .
laminar flows are reproduced very accurately ; in the turbulent regime , it still is an open question how the universal characteristics of a flow , the scaling exponents @xmath6 of the structure functions @xmath7 of order @xmath1 , defined by @xmath8 can be extracted from the basic equations .
intermittency is reflected by exponents @xmath6 that differ from those expected by dimensional analysis .
+ monte - carlo - simulations enable us to analyze turbulent flow patterns in detail , to gain direct insight into the formation of localized structures and their behaviour , and to measure observables like the scaling exponents .
+ instead of working with the full navier - stokes - eqs . , we decided to elaborate the methods using burgers eq . @xmath9 which can be interpreted as the flow equation for a fully compressible fluid . a finite viscosity @xmath4 and energy dissipation @xmath10
provide a dissipation length scale @xmath11 corresponding to the kolmogorov - scale in navier - stokes - turbulence : @xmath12 besides being of interest of its own ( e.g. in cosmology ) , working with eq .
( [ dh : eqburg ] ) has a number of technical advantages : * burgers eq .
is local , while the incompressibility condition acts as a nonlocal interaction in navier - stokes - turbulence . * the fundamental solutions to burgers eq .
are well - known ; in the limit of vanishing viscosity ( hopf - eq . ) , these form singular shocks as seen in fig .
( [ dh : fig1 ] ) .
the dissipation - scale provides an uv - regularization of the shock structures .
+ as a function of @xmath13 in periodic boundary conditions at constant @xmath14.,width=216 ] * a huge variety of analytical methods have been applied to burgers eq . , giving results that can directly be compared to numerical measurements ; and the origin of intermittency is well understood .
for the moment , we restrict our work to 1-dimensional burgulence which already shows intermittent statistics . a random force
@xmath15 has to be introduced into eq .
( [ dh : eqburg ] ) so that solutions are statistically homogenous in time : @xmath16\doteq \partial_{t}v + v \frac{\partial}{\partial x}v - \nu \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2 } v = f,\ ] ] where we model the stochastic force to be gaussian distributed with zero mean , energy injection rate @xmath10 and correlation length @xmath17 : @xmath18 we then expect intermittent statistics to be found within the inertial subrange @xmath19 .
we can further identify a characteristic velocity at the injection scale , @xmath20 , and a reynolds - number @xmath21 the path integral is introduced via the standard martin - siggia - rose - formalism , giving for the generating functional @xmath22 & = & \int \mathcal{d}v \ , \mathcal{d}f \ , \delta(\mathbf{b}[v ] - f )
\exp \left(-\frac{1}{2 } \int f \chi f + \int jv\right ) \\ & = & \int \mathcal{d}v \
, e^{-s[v ; j]},\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the action @xmath23 = \int dx dt dx ' dt ' \ , \left(\mathbf{b}[v(x , t)]\chi(x , x ' ; t , t ' ) \mathbf{b}[v(x',t ' ) ] + j(x , t)v(x , t)\right).\ ] ] beginning from an equivalent path integral , it has been shown that intermittent statistics of burgers eq . can be understood in terms of instanton solutions ( @xcite ) .
we discretized the above action onto a rectangular lattice with @xmath24 sites in space- , and @xmath25 sites in time - direction .
derivatives have been written in a symmetric ( stratanovich- ) prescription .
lattice spacings will be denoted @xmath26 and @xmath27 , respectively .
we mainly used a heat bath algorithm on single nodes . to indentify the lattice parameters with the constants of the continuum theory , we first notice that the viscosity has to be defined as @xmath28 in which we define the arbitrary constant @xmath29
the so - defined @xmath4 gives us @xmath30 according to eq .
( [ dh : egre ] ) .
we further find that the dissipation length @xmath11 is related to the correlation length @xmath17 simply by @xmath31 in any practical application , it is sufficient to define the @xmath32 and @xmath30 , to chose @xmath24 and @xmath17 , and to calculate from that @xmath25 and @xmath10 . stability considerations lead to further constraints for the lattice size , as will be explained in the following subsection .
as would be expected , the stability of the simulations over a large number of monte - carlo - steps is a big issue , due to the shock - like solutions of eq .
( [ dh : eqburg ] ) . indeed , if certain restrictions to the lattice parameters are not taken care of rigorously , the simulation terminates sooner or later due to divergencies . + it is interesting to notice that the occurence of instabilities in our mc - simulations is related to the ( non - trivial ) existence of the dissipation scale @xmath11 .
we found that to obtain stable simulations , @xmath11 has to be resolved on the lattice : @xmath33 .
unstable simultations occur otherwise we observed that the overall energy of the configurations accumulate in the smallest scale @xmath26 , causing the configuration to separate into two sub - configurations , of which one looks as the expected solution to the hopf - eq . , while the other grows beyond any limit , eventually breaking the simulation . +
as long as the dissipation length is resolved , the simulations are stable . having performed several millions of mc - steps , no further instabilities occured .
if length scales are measured in units of the system size , this translates into a constraint involving the reynolds - number : @xmath34 which enforces huge lattices for high @xmath30 as @xmath35 .
we simulated systems of different sizes , from @xmath36 to larger lattices of the same viscosity , as @xmath37 and @xmath38 , and also different viscosities , like @xmath39 or @xmath40 .
the reynolds - number ranged from @xmath41 to @xmath42 , not respecting the above conditions for stability .
this may seem surprising , but we could see that interesting information could also be extracted from the physical sub - configurations .
stable runs have been obtained for @xmath43 .
+ long runs of several millions of mc - steps , on a single node , are realistic for small lattices like @xmath44 or @xmath37 only . for larger lattices , a parallelized version of the code will be needed .
+ we obtained the following results : * thermalization and autocorrelation times are very long , up to the order of @xmath45 mc - steps . * in the stable runs , after thermalization , the typical shock solutions of the burgers eq . form and can be observed moving and interacting with each other , see fig .
( [ dh : fig2 ] ) . + of a @xmath46-lattice ; the plot shows a slize of constant @xmath14 , periodic boundary conditions in @xmath13 .
two shock - like structures are clearly visible-,width=216 ] * in the unstable runs before occurence of the instability , configurations resemble the kink - solutions of the hopf - eq .. * the disctinction between stable and unstable simulations can directly be related to the existence of a dissipation length scale which is either bigger ( stable ) or smaller ( unstable simulations ) than the lattice spacing .
we have shown how to perform stable mc - simulations of stochastic partial differential eq . , like burgers or the hopf - eq .. the lattice versions of the theories can directly be identified with their continuum counterparts , and , as long as certain constraints on the lattice size are respected , unlimited numbers of configurations produced . direct insight into the structures leading to intermittency and ,
thus , multiscaling , can be obtained .
especially , we want to point out that the existence of a dissipation length scale can be observed . + as next steps , complete statistics will be made ; especially the scaling exponents of the structure functions have to be compared with the analytic results .
later , we will proceed by analyzing the incompressible navier - stokes - eqs ..
we especially want to thank gernot mnster , westflische wilhelms - universitt mnster , for his support in numerous discussions .
99999999 e. balkovsky , g. falkovich , i. kolokolov , and v. lebedev , _ phys .
lett _ * 78 * , 1452 ( 1997 ) j. bec , k. khanin , _ arxiv:0704.1611v1 [ nlin.cd ] _ ( 2007 ) d. hochberg , c. molina - pars , j. prez - mercader , and m. visser , _ phys.rev .
e _ * 60 * , 6343 - 6360 ( 1999 )
|
hydrodynamic turbulence unsolved problem modern physics fundamentals easy navier - stokes - equations for velocity pressure fields @xmath0 @xmath1 constraint @xmath3 express conservation momentum in classical newtonian incompressible fluid viscosity density @xmath5 laminar flows reproduced accurately turbulent regime open question how universal characteristics flow scaling exponents structure functions extracted from equations intermittency reflected by exponents @xmath6 differ from dimensional analysis monte - carlo - simulations enable analyze turbulent flow patterns insight formation localized structures behaviour measure scaling exponents instead full navier - stokes - eqs methods using burgers eq . @xmath9 flow equation for fully compressible fluid finite viscosity @xmath4 energy dissipation @xmath10 provide dissipation length scale @xmath11 kolmogorov - scale in navier - stokes - turbulence @xmath12 working with eq . has technical advantages burgers eq . local incompressibility condition nonlocal fundamental solutions to burgers eq . known limit of vanishing viscosityform shocks in fig . dissipation - scale provides uv - regularization shock structures function of @xmath13 periodic boundary conditions constant @xmath14 analytical methods applied to burgers results compared to numerical measurements origin of intermittency understood restrict work to 1-dimensional burgulence shows intermittent statistics random force @xmath15 introduced into eq . solutions statistically homogenous @xmath16\doteq\partial_{t}v + v x - = model stochastic force gaussian distributed with zero mean energy injection rate @xmath10 correlation length @xmath17 @xmath18 expect intermittent statistics inertial subrange @xmath19identify characteristic velocity injection scale @xmath20 reynolds - number @xmath21 path integral introduced martin - siggia - rose - formalism generating functional @xmath22 \mathcal{d}v\delta(\mathbf{b}[v ] - f )\left(-\frac{1}{2 } f f + jv\right\mathcal{d}v{-s[v ; j]}{aligned action @xmath23 = dx dt '\left(\mathbf{b}[v(x , t)\chi(x t )\mathbf{b}[v(x + j(x , t)v(x t)\right). equivalent path integral intermittent statistics burgers understood instanton solutions @xcite ) discretized action rectangular lattice @xmath24 sites space- @xmath25 sites time - direction derivatives written stratanovich- ) prescription lattice spacings denoted @xmath26 @xmath27 used heat bath algorithm single nodes indentify lattice parameters constants continuum theory viscosity defined @xmath28 arbitrary constant @xmath29 @xmath4 gives @xmath30 eqdissipation length @xmath11 related to correlation length @xmath17 by @xmath31 to define @xmath32 @xmath30 chose @xmath24 and @xmath17 calculate @xmath25 and @xmath10 stability considerations lead to constraints for lattice size explained stability of simulations over monte - carlo - steps issue due to shock - like solutions of eq . if restrictions to lattice parameters not simulation terminates due to divergencies instabilities in mc - simulations related to dissipation scale @xmath11 stable simulations @xmath11 resolved on lattice : @xmath33 unstable simultations otherwise energy in smallest scale @xmath26 configuration into two sub - configurations one other grows beyond limit breaking simulation dissipation length resolved simulations stable performed several millions of mc - steps no further instabilities if length scales measured in units system size translates into constraint reynolds - number : @xmath34 enforces huge lattices for high @xmath30 @xmath35simulated different sizes from @xmath36 to larger lattices same different reynolds - number ranged from @xmath41 to @xmath42 not respecting conditions stability interesting information extracted from physical sub - configurations stable runs obtained for @xmath43 long runs several millions mc - steps single node realistic for small lattices like @xmath44 or larger lattices parallelized version code needed obtained results thermalization autocorrelation times long up to @xmath45 mc - steps stable runs typical shock solutions burgers form observed moving interacting fig @xmath46-lattice plot shows constant @xmath14 periodic boundary conditions in @xmath13 two shock - like structures visible unstable runs before instability configurations resemble kink - solutions hopf - eq disctinction between stable unstable simulations related to dissipation length scale bigger or than lattice spacing shown stable mc - simulations of stochastic partial differential eq . like burgers hopf - eq lattice versions theories identified with continuum counterparts constraints lattice size respected unlimited numbers configurations producedinsight structures intermittency multiscaling obtained existence dissipation length scale observed next statistics scaling exponents structure compared analytic results analyzing incompressible navier - stokes - eqs thank gernot mnster westflische wilhelms - universitt support discussions e. balkovsky. falkovich kolokolov v. lebedev . lett 78, 1452 ( 1997 ) j. bec k. khanin arxiv:0704.1611v1 nlin.cd 2007 ) d. hochberg. molina - pars j. prez - mercader m. visser.rev . 60 6343 - 6360 ( 1999
| 0.349824
| 2,130
| 1,101
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,029
|
the paper formulates a condition such that if the condition holds the riemann hypothesis is true .
# 1#2 # 1 # 2 .
# 3 riemann zeta function , riemann hypothesis , complex analysis .
|
the rieman zeta function is @xmath0 where @xmath1 , @xmath2 , is a complex number .
it is known that the zeta function can be continued analytically to the whole complex plane except for @xmath3 where the function has a pole .
the zeta function has trivial zeroes at even negative integers .
it does not have zeroes for @xmath4 and the only zeroes for @xmath5 are the trivial ones .
the nontrivial zeroes lie in the strip @xmath6 , see e.g. [ 1 ] .
let @xmath7 be the set of all primes larger than one .
let @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath8 .
we define @xmath9 by @xmath10 as @xmath11 does not have zeroes for @xmath12 and @xmath13 is analytic in the whole complex plane except for @xmath3 , the function @xmath9 is analytic when @xmath8 except for at @xmath3 .
if @xmath14 the function @xmath9 has the absolutely convergent series expression @xmath15 where the numbers @xmath16 are the primes in ( 2 ) .
we generalize the equation @xmath17 in lemma 1 .
let @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath14 , and @xmath20 .
we define absolutely convergent products @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 then @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 the functions ( 6 ) and ( 7 ) are given in a form where the highest orders of @xmath27 are directly seen . simplifying ( 6 ) @xmath28 from ( 7 ) @xmath29 directly multiplying the absolutely convergent products @xmath30 @xmath31 at @xmath32 the term @xmath33 and if @xmath34 then @xmath35 . the other claims follow .
lemma 1 is proved .
@xmath36 lemma 2 .
let @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , and @xmath8 .
there exists @xmath37 such that if @xmath38 then the following claims hold : the product ( 5 ) is absolutely convergent for @xmath8 .
@xmath39 defined by ( 5 ) is finite and nonzero and @xmath40 is finite and nonzero at @xmath32 .
the product ( 7 ) has an analytic continuation for @xmath8 and @xmath41 is finite at @xmath32 .
the product ( 6 ) has an analytic continuation for @xmath8 in all points except for an @xmath42-neighborhood of any zero of @xmath13 .
let @xmath37 be chosen smaller than @xmath43 and @xmath38 .
then @xmath44 .
this means that the product ( 5 ) is absolutely convergent .
as it is an absolutely convergent infinite product , it does not converge to zero .
thus , @xmath39 and @xmath40 are analytic and therefore finite for @xmath45 . then also @xmath46
. we can take the logarithm of @xmath41 when @xmath47 since the function is not zero . in order to analytically continue ( 7 ) ,
let us write @xmath48 where @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 the sum @xmath52 is obtained by expanding the logarithm into a series .
the sum @xmath52 converges absolutely for @xmath53 and the analytic continuation of @xmath54 yields the analytic continuation for @xmath41 for @xmath8 , @xmath38 .
this is shown as follows .
the first term to the right in @xmath52 converges absolutely since it has the power @xmath55 for @xmath16 .
the two other terms converge absolutely because for any @xmath56 , @xmath57 , holds @xmath58 inserting @xmath59 and @xmath60 shows absolute convergence of the terms for @xmath53 .
the equation ( 8) gives an analytic continuation for @xmath61 : @xmath62 is analytic when @xmath41 and @xmath39 are analytic and nonzero .
@xmath39 is nonzero when @xmath8 and @xmath38 .
however , @xmath41 can be zero .
we have already shown that @xmath41 differs from @xmath54 only by a nonzero function .
let @xmath63 be a zero of @xmath13 .
the zeroes of @xmath13 are isolated , if @xmath42 is selected sufficiently small , the points when @xmath64 are in an @xmath42-neighborhood of @xmath63 .
lemma 2 is proved .
@xmath36 notice that in a neighborhood of a zero @xmath63 of @xmath13 the function @xmath61 is singular always when @xmath64 .
@xmath61 is not continuous at @xmath65 because @xmath66 but @xmath67 is unbounded for some arbitrarily small @xmath68 .
thus , if a zero @xmath63 of @xmath13 exists , @xmath61 does not behave nicely .
this does not mean that @xmath61 actually has such discontinuities since we can not assume to know that a zero of @xmath13 exists . let us define the finite products @xmath69 @xmath70 and the infinite products that are absolutely convergent when @xmath47 , @xmath71 : @xmath72 for any @xmath73 holds @xmath74 lemma 3 . if @xmath75 for @xmath76 , @xmath77 , @xmath78 , then @xmath79 and @xmath80 for every @xmath81 .
let @xmath63 be a point where @xmath75 and @xmath82 . in the equation
@xmath83 @xmath84 and @xmath85 are finite products
. they are nonzero at @xmath65 and continuous at @xmath32 as functions of @xmath68 .
@xmath86 is zero at @xmath65 . if we can vary @xmath68 slightly while keeping @xmath87 at @xmath63 and find such an @xmath68 , @xmath38 ,
that @xmath88 then the product in ( 9 ) is not zero , i.e. @xmath89 . thus , it is not possible to vary @xmath68 in this way .
it follows that all partial derivatives of @xmath86 with respect to @xmath68 vanish at @xmath65 : @xmath90 lemma 3 is proved .
let @xmath75 for @xmath63 such that @xmath91 .
let us assume that @xmath92 for every @xmath93 . then for @xmath81 @xmath94 let @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , and @xmath8
let @xmath37 be chosen smaller than @xmath43 and @xmath38 . then @xmath44 .
we also assume that @xmath37 is chosen so small that @xmath61 and @xmath41 have the analytic continuations from lemma 2 .
let @xmath95 , @xmath96 , be any continuously differentiable functions of @xmath87 and @xmath68 in an open neighborhood of @xmath97 and let the infinite product @xmath98 be absolutely convergent , then @xmath99 @xmath100 for @xmath41 as in ( 7 ) and @xmath101 we get from ( 10 ) @xmath102 let us write @xmath103 and @xmath104 @xmath105 then @xmath106 is absolutely convergent if @xmath53 and @xmath107 is absolutely convergent if @xmath101 . for @xmath108
holds @xmath109 we can continue @xmath107 analytically to @xmath110 by ( 11 ) , except to points where @xmath111 .
thus , if @xmath112 and @xmath38 , then holds @xmath113 likewise , let @xmath101 and @xmath114 .
by ( 10 ) , for @xmath108 holds @xmath115 where @xmath116 @xmath117 the function @xmath118 converges absolutely if @xmath8 while @xmath119 converges absolutely if @xmath14 .
we can continue @xmath119 analytically to @xmath110 by ( 12 ) , except to points where @xmath120 .
thus , if @xmath112 and @xmath38 , then holds @xmath121 we notice that @xmath122 .
the function @xmath119 has a pole at @xmath63 but @xmath41 is differentiable at @xmath123 , so we can define the value of the product @xmath124 at @xmath125 by first cancelling the pole of @xmath119 by the zero of @xmath13 at @xmath125 .
we denote the function @xmath124 at @xmath125 by @xmath126 . in a similar way we can define @xmath127 at @xmath123 . at @xmath65
we get @xmath128 since @xmath106 is analytic and therefore finite at @xmath65 and @xmath129 . by the assumption
@xmath130 then @xmath131 by the assumption @xmath132 for @xmath133 .
the convergent part @xmath106 and all its partial derivatives are finite at @xmath65 and vanish when multiplied by a zero .
thus @xmath134 the convergent part @xmath118 and all its derivatives are finite at @xmath135 and vanish when multiplied by a zero .
thus , if @xmath136 is shown by induction for @xmath137 , then @xmath138 let us assume @xmath136 is shown by induction for @xmath139
. then @xmath140 @xmath141 by the assumption .
lemma 4 is proved .
let us assume that the following condition holds : if @xmath75 for @xmath63 such that @xmath91 , then @xmath142 for @xmath81
. under this condition holds : if @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath6 , and @xmath120 then @xmath143 .
riemann showed that @xmath144 thus , if there exists a zero @xmath76 of @xmath13 with @xmath145 then there exists a zero of @xmath13 at a symmetric point in @xmath146 .
therefore we only need to look at the strip @xmath147 .
let us assume there exists @xmath76 with @xmath75 and @xmath148 . by the assumption @xmath149 for every @xmath81 .
as @xmath13 is analytic if @xmath150 , it has a converging taylor series in some neighborhood of every point @xmath150 .
we can analytically continue @xmath13 along the @xmath151 line starting from @xmath152 .
since @xmath75 and all derivatives with respect to @xmath87 vanish , @xmath120 for every point @xmath87 to which the function is continued .
thus @xmath153 for some @xmath14 which is a contradiction .
therefore no such @xmath63 exists .
lemma 5 proves the riemann hypothesis if we can show the following conjecture .
conjecture 1 .
if @xmath75 for @xmath76 , @xmath77 , @xmath78 , then @xmath154 and @xmath92 for every @xmath81 . _
argument : _ let us assume that @xmath63 is a zero of @xmath13 and @xmath155 .
the proof of lemma 3 works for @xmath41 in the same way as for @xmath86 if we show that @xmath61 is continuous at @xmath123 .
in fact , if the proof of lemma 3 fails for @xmath41 , then @xmath66 and @xmath156 for an arbitrarily small @xmath157 .
let @xmath158 be very large .
if @xmath159 , then @xmath160 .
@xmath9 is analytic and thus bounded for @xmath161
. we can select @xmath125 and consider @xmath67 as a function of @xmath68 .
if @xmath158 is large , the function is analytic .
it can be continued to smaller values of @xmath158 , except to points when it becomes infinite , by analytic continuation .
especially , the analytic continuation is continuous .
thus , @xmath67 is continuous at @xmath32 since @xmath162 is not infinite .
the argument is finished .
if the argument for conjecture 1 is valid , then the riemann hypothesis holds . the proof is elementary and uses known methods , though functions of several complex variables may not be common in this context .
the proof is , however , very much in line with the original thoughts that the riemann hypothesis is a problem of complex analysis and not of number theory , and that the hypothesis is a consequence of the convergence of the harmonic series , not of deep , and to us unknown , properties of prime numbers . just as the pole of @xmath13 at @xmath3 and nonexistence of zeroes or poles for @xmath47 is a consequence of the harmonic series , in conjecture 1 , the zeroes at @xmath163 and the riemann hypothesis are a consequence of convergence of @xmath39 .
it is not correct to claim that the proof only uses the increasing property of primes .
the regions of convergence are those of the harmonic series .
the proof in fact uses all information we know of all primes : that their products make up all integers and that the harmonic series converges on a certain area .
|
rieman zeta function @xmath0 @xmath1 complex number zeta function continued complex plane except @xmath3 pole zeta trivial zeroes at negative integers zeroes @xmath4 zeroes @xmath5 trivial nontrivial zeroes in strip @xmath6 @xmath7 primes larger than one @xmath1 define @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 zeroes @xmath12 @xmath13 analytic complex plane except @xmath3 @xmath9 analytic @xmath8 @xmath3 @xmath14 function @xmath9 convergent series expression @xmath15 numbers @xmath16 primes in ( 2 ) generalize equation @xmath17 lemma 1 @xmath18 @xmath20 define convergent products @xmath21 @xmath24 @xmath26 functions ( 6 ) 7 ) highest orders of @xmath27 seen simplifying 6 @xmath28 @xmath29 multiplying convergent products @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 other claims follow lemma 1 proved @xmath36 lemma 2 @xmath18 @xmath37 @xmath38 claims hold product ( 5 ) convergent for @xmath8 @xmath39 finite nonzero @xmath40 finite nonzero at @xmath32 product ( 7 ) analytic continuation for @xmath8 @xmath41 finite at @xmath32 product ( 6 ) analytic continuation for @xmath8 points except @xmath42-neighborhood zero @xmath13 @xmath37 smaller than @xmath43 @xmath38 @xmath44 product ( 5 ) convergent converge to zero @xmath39 @xmath40 analytic finite for @xmath45 @xmath46 logarithm @xmath41 @xmath47 function not zero continue 7 ) @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 sum @xmath52 expanding logarithm series sum @xmath52 converges for @xmath53 continuation @xmath54 continuation for @xmath41 @xmath8 @xmath38 first term @xmath52 converges power @xmath55 for @xmath16 two other terms converge @xmath56 @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 convergence terms @xmath53equation ( 8) analytic continuation for @xmath61 @xmath62 analytic when @xmath41 nonzero @xmath39 nonzero when @xmath41 can be zero differs from @xmath54 by nonzero function @xmath63 zero of @xmath13 zeroes isolated if @xmath42 small points @xmath64 in @xmath42-neighborhood of @xmath63 lemma 2 proved @xmath36 neighborhood zero @xmath63 @xmath13 function @xmath61 singular @xmath64 not continuous at @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 unbounded for @xmath68 if zero @xmath63 of @xmath13 exists @xmath61 behave discontinuities zero define finite products @xmath69 @xmath70 infinite products convergent when @xmath47 @xmath72 @xmath73 holds @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath81 @xmath63 point where @xmath75 @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath85 finite products nonzero at @xmath65 continuous at @xmath32 functions of @xmath68 @xmath86 zero at @xmath65vary @xmath68 @xmath87 @xmath63 @xmath68 @xmath88 product ( 9 ) not zero @xmath89 not possible vary @xmath68 partial derivatives @xmath86 vanish at @xmath65 @xmath90 lemma 3 proved @xmath75 for @xmath63 @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath81 @xmath94 @xmath18 @xmath37 smaller than @xmath43 @xmath38 @xmath44 @xmath37 @xmath61 @xmath41 analytic continuations from lemma 2 @xmath95 @xmath96 differentiable functions of @xmath87 @xmath68 neighborhood @xmath97 infinite product @xmath98 convergent @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath41 @xmath101 10 @xmath102 write @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 convergent @xmath53 @xmath107 convergent @xmath101 @xmath108 holds @xmath109 continue @xmath107 to @xmath110 ( 11 ) @xmath111 @xmath112 @xmath38 @xmath113 @xmath101 @xmath114@xmath108 holds @xmath115 @xmath116 @xmath118 converges @xmath8 @xmath119 @xmath14 continue @xmath119 to @xmath110 12 @xmath120 @xmath112 @xmath38 holds @xmath121 @xmath122 @xmath119 pole at @xmath63 @xmath41 differentiable at @xmath123 define value product @xmath124 @xmath125 cancelling pole @xmath119 zero @xmath13 @xmath125 denote function @xmath124 @xmath125 @xmath126 define @xmath127 at @xmath123 @xmath65 @xmath128 @xmath106 analytic finite at @xmath65 @xmath129 assumption @xmath130 @xmath131 @xmath132 @xmath133 convergent part @xmath106 derivatives finite at @xmath65 vanish multiplied zero @xmath134 convergent @xmath118 derivatives finite at @xmath135 vanish multiplied zero @xmath136 induction @xmath137 @xmath136 @xmath139 @xmath140 @xmath141 condition holds @xmath75 for @xmath63 @xmath91 @xmath142 for @xmath81 @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath6 @xmath120 @xmath143riemann showed @xmath144 zero @xmath76 @xmath13 with @xmath145 zero point @xmath146 look strip @xmath147 assume @xmath76 with @xmath75 @xmath148 @xmath149 for @xmath81 @xmath13 analytic @xmath150 converging taylor series point @xmath150 continue @xmath13 along @xmath151 line from @xmath152 @xmath75 derivatives @xmath87 vanish @xmath120 every point @xmath87 @xmath153 @xmath14 contradiction no @xmath63 exists lemma 5 proves riemann hypothesis conjecture @xmath75 for @xmath76 @xmath154 @xmath92 for every @xmath81 @xmath63 zero of @xmath13 @xmath155 proof lemma 3 works for @xmath41 @xmath86 @xmath61 continuous at @xmath123 if proof lemma 3 fails @xmath41 @xmath66 @xmath156 @xmath157 @xmath158 large @xmath159 @xmath160 @xmath9 analytic bounded for @xmath161 select @xmath125 consider @xmath67 function of @xmath68 @xmath158 large function analyticcontinued to smaller values @xmath158 except infinite by analytic continuation analytic continuation continuous @xmath67 continuous at @xmath32 since @xmath162 not infinite argument finished conjecture 1 valid riemann hypothesis holds proof elementary uses known methods functions complex variables not common proof line with original thoughts riemann hypothesis problem complex analysis not number theory consequence of convergence harmonic series not deep unknown properties prime numbers pole of @xmath13 at @xmath3 nonexistence zeroes poles @xmath47 consequence harmonic series conjecture 1 zeroes at @xmath163 riemann hypothesis consequence convergence @xmath39 not proof only uses increasing property primes regions convergence harmonic series uses all information primes products make up integers harmonic series converges on certain area
| 0.428508
| 3,038
| 1,700
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,034
|
after making an abelian projection in the maximally abelian gauge , we measure the distribution of abelian electric flux and monopole currents around an abelian wilson loop in @xmath0 and @xmath1 qcd . the ( dual ) meissner effect is observed clearly .
the vacua in the confinement phases of @xmath0 and @xmath1 are both at around the border between type-1 and type-2 ( dual ) superconductor .
|
it is important to understand the mechanism of quark confinement in qcd .
we expect that color electric flux is squeezed by the dual meissner effect due to color magnetic monopole condensation@xcite .
it is well known that such a situation occurs in compact u(1 ) lattice gauge theory(lgt)@xcite . in qcd
, thooft conjectured that the role is played by the monopoles in abelian projected qcd which can be regarded as an abelian theory with abelian charges and magnetic monopoles@xcite .
we choose the maximally abelian ( ma ) gauge @xcite in which diagonal components of all link variables are maximized as much as possible by the gauge transformation .
gauge - fixed link variables are decomposed into a product of two matrices @xmath2 where @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 are a gauge - fixing matrix , an off - diagonal and a diagonal matrix , respectively .
monte carlo simulations in this gauge have shown interesting results , i.e. , abelian dominance @xcite and interesting monopole behaviors @xcite .
these results show that the monopoles play an important role in qcd confinement , but evidence of the monopole condensation in the confinement phase is not yet obtained . in this report
, we show the ( dual ) meissner effect occurs in the presence of external charges also in qcd@xcite . in the continuum , the assumptions of the abelian dominance and the monopole condensation lead us to a dual form of the abelian ginzburg - landau ( g - l ) theory@xcite .
so we study the g - l type equations between the abelian electric field and the magnetic monopole currents in the presence of a static quark - antiquark pair in su(2 ) and su(3 ) , following the method developed by singh et al.@xcite .
our purpose is to apply the method to su(3 ) lgt as well as su(2 ) and to investigate scaling behaviors of the penetration length @xmath6 and the coherence length @xmath7 .
we used the wilson action and simulations are performed on @xmath8 lattice in su(2 ) ( @xmath9 and @xmath10 ) and on @xmath11 lattice in su(3 ) ( @xmath12 and @xmath13 ) .
measurements are done every 30 sweeps and we adopted totally 400 configurations in su(2 ) and 500 configurations in su(3 ) . for thermalization , we discarded inital 1500 sweeps .
abelian link variables @xmath5 are extracted after the gauge - fixing is done in the ma gauge .
the average of an observable @xmath14 is computed as @xmath15 where @xmath16 is an abelian wilson loop .
we used @xmath17 and @xmath18 in su(2 ) and @xmath17 in su(3 ) .
the electric field operator is defined by @xmath19 where @xmath20 is an abelian plaquette operator .
monopole currents are defined following degrand - toussaint@xcite .
we investigate the dual g - l equations@xcite : @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 the order parameter @xmath24 is given by the following approximate solution of the g - l equation @xmath25 where we adopted @xmath26 .
then we get the following extended london equation : @xmath27 where @xmath28 is an integer and @xmath29 is the quantized electric flux at the origin @xmath30 .
to reproduce the @xmath31data , we choose the following function for the azimuthal component of the monopole current : @xmath32 where @xmath33 and @xmath34 are parameters .
the form ensures that @xmath35 vanishes linearly at @xmath30 and exponentialy as @xmath36 .
then , substituting the current into eq.[er ] , we examine the electric field data except the @xmath30 point and determine both the penetration and the coherence lengths .
the typical data of the curl of the monopole currents and the electric field are plotted in fig.1 ( @xmath1 ) .
if the extreme type-2 dual superconductor is the case , @xmath37 . then , the data with @xmath38 and @xmath39 can not satisfy eq.[er ] .
hence , there must be a region where @xmath40 , i.e. , we need both @xmath6 and @xmath7 also in the su(3 ) case .
the values of the both lengths obtained are plotted in fig.2 .
the fluxoid @xmath29 evaluated from the fluxoid relation is consistent with the net flux through the entire lattice in su(2 ) and su(3 ) .
the g - l parameter @xmath41 are shown in fig.3 .
the values are close to the borderline of the type-1 and type-2 dual superconductor .
it seems that the data of the large wilson loop show the scaling behaviors .
epsf = 0.5 = 0.5 [ fig : curl3 ] = 0.5 = 0.5 = 0.5 [ fig : scale1 ] = 0.5 = 0.5 [ fig : scale3 ]
we have a direct evidence of the dual meissner effect in @xmath0 and @xmath1 qcd . 1 . the color electric field and the magnetic monopole current satisfy the extended dual london equation in @xmath0 @xmath42 and @xmath1 @xmath43 lattice
qcd . the monopole current plays the role of the dual `` diamagnetic current '' squeezing the electric flux .
all @xmath6 and @xmath7 data show that the @xmath0 and @xmath1 vacua are both close to the borderline of the type-1 and type-2 dual superconductor .
so , it is expected that the vortex - vortex interactions are small .
it seems that the g - l parameter scales near the borderline in the case of the large wilson loop .
therefore , scalar and axial - vector glueball masses are nearly degenerate : @xmath44 4 .
it is interesting to extend this analysis to the study of the extended monopoles@xcite of the type-2 , since large monopole loops are seen to be important @xcite .
99 g.thooft,_high energy physics _ , ed.a.zichichi ( editorice compositori , bologna , 1975 ) . s. mandelstam , phys . rep .
23c ( 1976 ) 245 .
t.banks et al . , nucl .
b129 ( 1977 ) 493 .
g. thooft , nucl .
b190 ( 1981 ) 455 .
kronfeld et al . , phys .
lett . 198b ( 1987 ) 516 , + a.s .
kronfeld et al . , nucl.phys .
b293 ( 1987 ) 461 .
t. suzuki and i. yotsuyanagi , phys .
d42 ( 1990 ) 4257 .
s. hioki et al .
272b ( 1991 ) 326 .
t. suzuki , nucl .
b(proc . suppl . ) 30 ( 1993 ) 176 .
s.kitahara et al . , nucl .
b(proc . suppl . ) 30 ( 1993 ) 557 .
v. singh et al . , lsu preprint lsuhep- 1- 92 ( 1992 ) , + r.w .
haymaker , nucl .
b(proc . suppl . ) 30 ( 1993 ) 568 .
p. cea and l. cosmai , nucl .
suppl . ) 30 ( 1993 ) 572 .
t. suzuki , prog .
81 ( 1988 ) 929 .
+ s. maedan and t. suzuki , prog .
81 ( 1989 ) 229 .
+ t. suzuki , prog .
81 ( 1989 ) 752 .
+ s. maedan et al . , prog .
( 1990 ) 130 .
+ s. kamizawa et al . , nucl phys .
b389 ( 1993 ) 563 .
+ h. monden et al . , phys .
b294 ( 1992 ) 100 .
degrand and d. toussaint , phys .
d22 ( 1980 ) 2478 .
ivanenko et al . ,
phys . lett .
252b ( 1990 ) 631 .
h.shiba and t.suzuki , kanazawa university , report no .
kanazawa 93 - 09 , 1993 .
h.shiba and t.suzuki , kanazawa university , report no .
kanazawa 93 - 10 , 1993 .
|
important understand mechanism quark confinement in qcd color electric flux squeezed dual meissner effect magnetic monopole condensation situation occurs compact u(1 ) lattice gauge theory role monopoles abelian projected qcd abelian theory abelian charges magnetic monopoles choose maximally abelian ) gauge diagonal components variables maximized gauge transformation gauge - fixed link variables decomposed two matrices @xmath2 gauge - fixing off - diagonal diagonal monte carlo simulations shown results abelian dominance monopole behaviors show monopoles important role qcd confinement evidence monopole condensation confinement phase not obtained dual meissner effect occurs external charges in qcd assumptions abelian dominance monopole condensation lead dual form abelian ginzburg - landau g - l ) theory study g - l type equations abelian electric field magnetic monopole currents static quark - antiquark pair in su(2 ) su(3 ) following method singh et al.apply method su(3 su(2 investigate scaling penetration length @xmath6 coherence length @xmath7 used wilson action simulations @xmath8 lattice @xmath11 measurements every 30 sweeps adopted 400 su(2 ) 500 su(3 ) thermalization discarded 1500 sweeps abelian link variables extracted after gauge - fixing gauge average observable @xmath14 computed @xmath15 @xmath16 abelian wilson loop used @xmath17 @xmath18 su(2 ) su(3 ) electric field operator defined @xmath19 @xmath20 abelian plaquette operator monopole currents defined degrand - toussaint@xcite investigate dual g - l equations order parameter @xmath24 approximate solution g - l equation @xmath25 adopted @xmath26 extended london equation @xmath27 @xmath28 integer @xmath29 quantized electric flux origin @xmath30 reproduce @xmath31data function azimuthal component monopole current @xmath32 @xmath33 parameters @xmath35 vanishes @xmath30 @xmath36 substituting current into eq.examine electric field data except @xmath30 point determine penetration coherence lengths data monopole currents electric field plotted in fig.1 extreme type-2 dual superconductor @xmath37 data @xmath38 @xmath39 satisfy eq region where @xmath40 need both @xmath6 @xmath7 su(3 ) case values lengths plotted in.2 fluxoid @xmath29 consistent with net flux lattice in su(2 ) su(3 ) g - l parameter @xmath41 shown in fig.3 values close to borderline type-1 type-2 dual superconductor data large wilson loop show scaling behaviors = 0.5 = evidence dual meissner effect in @xmath0 @xmath1 qcd color electric field magnetic monopole current satisfy extended dual london equation in @xmath0 @xmath42 @xmath43 lattice monopole current dual diamagnetic current squeezing electric flux @xmath6 @xmath7 data show @xmath0 @xmath1 vacua close to borderline type-1 type-2 dual superconductor vortex - vortex interactions small g - l parameter scales near borderline large wilson loopscalar axial - vector glueball masses degenerate extend analysis extended monopoles type-2 large monopole loops important.thooft energy physics ed.zichichi bologna 1975 mandelstam phys . 23c ( 1976 ) 245.banks et al nucl b129 ( 1977 ) 493 thooft b190 ( 1981 ) 455 kronfeld et al phys . 198b ( 1987 ) 516 kronfeld b293 ( 1987 ) 461 suzuki yotsuyanagi phys . d42 ( 1990 ) 4257 hioki et al 272b ( 1991 ) 326 suzuki 30 ( 1993 ) 176.kitahara al 1993 ) 557 singh et al . preprint- 1- 92 ( 1992 ) haymaker 30 ( 1993 ) 568. cea cosmai 1993 ) 572 suzuki prog . 81 ( 1988 ) 929 maedan t suzuki 81 ( 1989 ) 229 1989 ) 752 maedan 1990 ) 130 kamizawa et al nucl phys b389 1993 ) 563 monden phys b294 1992 ) 100 degrand toussaint d22 1980 ) 2478 ivanenko phys 252b 1990 ) 631 h.shiba t.suzuki kanazawa university report 93 - 09 1993.shiba.suzuki report 93 - 10 1993
| 0.31131
| 1,995
| 1,016
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,038
|
we investigate the single and pair production of new heavy leptons via string inspired @xmath0 model at future linear colliders .
signal and corresponding backgrounds for these leptons are studied .
we have found that single production of heavy leptons is more relevant than that of pair production , as expected . for a maximal mixing value of 0.1 ,
the upper mass limits of 2750 gev in the single case and 1250 gev in the pair production case are obtained at @xmath1 tev collider option .
|
the standard model ( sm ) describes many phenomena up to the energies that can be reached today .
however , some problems like mass hierarchy and the number of fermion generations can not be addressed by the sm .
many models , which include new fermions and interactions , have been developed to deal with the mentioned shortcomings of the sm .
the string inspired @xmath2 model is a well motivated one which includes extra gauge bosons and new fermions assigned to the 27-dimensional representation @xcite . in the search for
extensions of the sm the new heavy leptons play an important role .
many analysis have been done for the production of heavy leptons at future @xmath3 @xcite , at hadron @xcite and also at @xmath4 colliders @xcite .
the experimental upper bounds for the heavy lepton masses were found to be 44 gev by opal @xcite , 46 gev by aleph @xcite and 90 gev by h1 @xcite collaborations .
this means that , heavy leptons could be detected at future high energy colliders .
we have previously considered the single production of new heavy leptons via string inspired @xmath0 model in @xmath4 collisions @xcite . in this study , we consider both the single and the pair production of heavy leptons separately by using the same model and taking into account the signal and background events at future linear colliders
. the main parameters of these collider options were taken from refs . @xcite and displayed in table [ tab : table1 ] .
the single production of heavy leptons @xmath5 , in @xmath3 collisions occur through the @xmath6 and @xmath7 channel processes @xmath8 caused by the flavor changing neutral current ( fcnc ) lagrangian : @xmath9 where @xmath10 are the mixing angles between right handed components of the ordinary and new heavy charged leptons .
the order of the mixings of the ordinary and heavy leptons are known to be @xmath11 , which comes from low energy phenomenological calculations and the high precision measurements of the @xmath12 properties at linear colliders @xcite .
we use the parameter @xmath13 to denote the mixing angles and take @xmath14 as an upper value in the numerical calculations .
the differential production cross section takes the form , @xmath15\left[(t - m_z^2)^2+m_z^2\gamma_z^2\right]}\right.\nonumber\\ & & \left .
-\frac{(m^2-s - t)(s+t)(a_e - v_e)^2+t(m^2-t)(a_e+v_e)^2 } { ( s - m_z^2)^2+m_z^2\gamma_z^2}\right.\nonumber\\ & & \left.+ \frac{\left[\left[(s+t)^2+s^2-(2s+t)m^2\right](a_e^2+v_e^2)+2t(m^2 - 2s - t)a_ev_e\right]}{(t - m_z^2)^2+m_z^2\gamma_z^2}\right]\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath16 and @xmath17 , @xmath18 is the decay width and @xmath19 is the mass of @xmath12 boson , @xmath6 and @xmath7 are mandelstam variables . in fig .
[ fig : f1 ] , we display the total cross sections as function of the heavy lepton masses , for the three center of mass energies of the proposed options .
after their production , the heavy leptons will decay via the neutral current process @xmath20 , where @xmath21 .
the branching ratios for these processes would be around @xmath22 for each channel . in tables [ tab : t2 ] , [ tab : t3 ] and [ tab : t4 ]
, we presented the single production cross sections ( @xmath23 ) , signal and background cross sections depending on the heavy lepton mass @xmath24 , for 0.5 , 1 and 3 tev energy @xmath3 colliders , respectively .
the branching ratios @xmath25 and @xmath26 refer to @xmath27 and @xmath28 . the significance of signal and background is defined as @xmath29 ,
here @xmath30 and @xmath31 are the signal and background number of events .
the total decay widths of the heavy leptons are given in the last column of the tables .
as seen from these tables , the @xmath29 values are higher than five , which is enough for observability , up to the center of mass energies of the colliders .
single production of heavy lepton is feasible up to the center of mass energies of the @xmath3 colliders even with smaller mixing coupling values .
for example , if we take at least 10 signal events and @xmath32 as discovery criteria , the ilc with @xmath330.5 tev can probe mixing values of @xmath34 for 350 gev leptons .
the same couplings can be probed at @xmath331 and @xmath333 tev for even greater masses such as 800 and 2750 gev .
we applied a cut of @xmath35 gev in order to form the signal and reduce the background for the sm background process @xmath36 .
[ fig : f2 ] shows the @xmath37 distributions at three different linear colliders . in figs .
[ fig : f3 ] , [ fig : f4 ] and [ fig : f5 ] , we give the invariant mass distributions @xmath38 with cut @xmath39 gev at @xmath330.5 , 1 and 3 tev , respectively . figs .
[ fig : f3 ] and [ fig : f4 ] have an increasing character for a cut 10 gev interestingly , but lose this character for higher cuts .
for instance , all of the three distributions in figs .
[ fig : f3]-[fig : f5 ] have decreasing characters with jacobian peaks around 150 - 200 gev for a cut value of 80 gev .
pair production of heavy leptons in @xmath2 occur through the @xmath7-channel flavor changing neutral current process @xmath40 , and the differential cross section for this process is given by , @xmath41}\left[(m^2-t)^2m^4 + 4m_z^2m^4s+4(s+t - m^2)^2m_z^4\right].\ ] ] the total cross sections as functions of heavy lepton masses @xmath24 , are displayed in fig .
[ fig : f6 ] . signal and background cross sections depending again on the heavy lepton masses , are presented in tables [ tab : t5 ] , [ tab : t6 ] and [ tab : t7 ] at 0.5 , 1 and 3 tev , respectively . for the pair production of heavy leptons at linear colliders
we expect of order of @xmath42 signal events for 1250 gev leptons for the coupling value of @xmath43 . on the other hand ,
the lower limit of the coupling which can be probed by pair production at linear colliders is found to be 0.05 .
we applied an initial cut on the electron and jet transverse momentum @xmath44 gev for the signal and background analysis .
[ fig : f7 ] shows the @xmath37 distributions of the background at the colliders .
the distribution of invariant mass @xmath45 is presented in figs .
[ fig : f8 ] , [ fig : f9 ] and [ fig : f10 ] at @xmath330.5 , 1 and 3 , respectively .
we have used the high energy package comphep for calculations of background cross sections reported in this study @xcite .
this study proves that linear colliders can test the existence of single and pair production of heavy leptons .
the production of a single heavy lepton is more relevant than the pair production .
namely , in the case of @xmath1 tev option , we expect 257 single events for @xmath43 and 26 single events for @xmath34 for 2750 gev ( which is the upper bound ) leptons . in the case of pair production , for @xmath43
we expect @xmath42 events for 1250 gev ( upper value ) leptons , while no pair event can be observed for @xmath34 , since the pair production cross section is suppressed by the fourth power of mixing couplings .
j. l. hewett and t. g. rizzo , phys .
rept . *
183 * , 193 ( 1989 ) .
f. m. l. almeida , j. h. lopes , j. a. martins simoes and c. m. porto , phys .
d * 44 * , 2836 ( 1991 ) .
f. m. l. almeida , j. h. lopes , j. a. martins simoes , p. p. queiroz filho and a. j. ramalho , phys .
d * 51 * , 5990 ( 1995 ) f. m. l. almeida , y. a. coutinho , j. a. martins simoes and m. a. b. do vale , phys .
d * 63 * , 075005 ( 2001 ) f. m. l. almeida , y. a. coutinho , j. a. martins simoes , s. wulck and m. a. b. do vale , eur .
j. c * 30 * , 327 ( 2003 ) p. h. frampton , d. ng , m. sher and y. yuan , phys .
d * 48 * , 3128 ( 1993 ) y. a. coutinho , j. a. martins simoes , c. m. porto and p. p. queiroz filho , phys .
d * 57 * , 6975 ( 1998 ) .
j. e. cieza montalvo and p. p.
de queiroz filho , phys .
d * 66 * , 055003 ( 2002 ) .
t. g. rizzo , phys .
b * 188 * , 95 ( 1987 ) .
a. t. alan , a. t. tasci and o. cakir , acta phys .
b * 35 * , 2199 ( 2004 ) .
m. z. akrawy _ et al . _
[ opal collaboration ] , phys .
b * 240 * , 250 ( 1990 ) .
d. decamp _ et al . _
[ aleph collaboration ] , phys .
rept . * 216 * , 253 ( 1992 ) .
t. ahmed _ et al . _
[ h1 collaboration ] , phys .
b * 340 * , 205 ( 1994 ) .
e. accomando
_ et al . _
[ clic physics working group ] , arxiv : hep - ph/0412251 .
international linear collider - technical review report , ilc - trc/2003 report ( 2003 ) , http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/ilc-trc/2002/index.html p. bamert , c. p. burgess and i. maksymyk , phys .
b * 356 * , 282 ( 1995 ) f. m. l. almeida , y. a. coutinho , j. a. martins simoes and m. a. b. do vale , phys .
d * 62 * , 075004 ( 2000 ) .
e. nardi , e. roulet and d. tommasini , phys .
b * 327 * , 319 ( 1994 ) a. pukhov _ et al .
_ , `` comphep : a package for evaluation of feynman diagrams and integration over multi - particle phase space . '' , arxiv : hep - ph/9908288 .
|
standard model sm describes phenomena energies reached problems like mass hierarchy fermion generations models new fermions interactions deal with shortcomings string inspired @xmath2 model includes extra gauge bosons new fermions 27-dimensional representation search for extensions new heavy leptons important analysis for production heavy leptons at future @xmath3 hadron @xmath4 colliders experimental upper bounds for heavy lepton masses 44 gev by opal 46 gev aleph 90 gev h1 heavy leptons detected at future high energy colliders considered single production heavy leptons via string inspired @xmath0 model @xmath4 collisions single pair production heavy leptons separately model signal background events at future linear colliders parameters collider options from refs @xcite displayed in table single production of heavy leptons @xmath5 @xmath3 collisions through @xmath6 @xmath7 channel processes by flavor changing neutral current lagrangian @xmath9 mixing angles between ordinary new heavy charged leptons order of mixings ordinary heavy leptons @xmath11 from low energy phenomenological calculations high precision measurements @xmath12 properties at linear collidersparameter @xmath13 mixing angles @xmath14 upper value numerical calculations differential production cross section @xmath15(t - m_z^2)^2+m_z^2\gamma_z^2^2-s -^2+t(m - m_z^2)^2+m_z^2\gamma_z^2(s+t)^2+s^2-(2s+t)m^2_e^2+v_e^2)+2t(m^2 - 2s - t(t - m_z^2)^2+m_z^2\gamma_z^2 @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 decay width @xmath19 mass @xmath12 boson @xmath6 @xmath7 mandelstam variables fig total cross sections heavy lepton masses three center mass energies proposed options production heavy leptons decay neutral current process @xmath20 @xmath21 branching ratios around @xmath22 each channeltables presented single production signal background cross sections heavy lepton mass @xmath24 for 0.5 1 3 tev energy @xmath3 colliders branching ratios @xmath25 @xmath26 refer to @xmath27 @xmath28 significance signal background defined as @xmath29 @xmath30 signal background number events total decay widths heavy leptons last column tables @xmath29 values higher than five enough for observability up to center mass energies colliders single production heavy lepton feasible up to center @xmath3 colliders smaller mixing coupling values 10 signal events @xmath32 discovery criteria ilc with @xmath330.5 tev probe mixing values @xmath34 for 350 gev leptons couplings probed at @xmath331 @xmath333 tev for greater masses 800 2750 gev applied cut of @xmath35 gev form signal reduce background for process @xmath36 fig f2 shows @xmath37 distributions at three linear colliders invariant mass distributions @xmath38 @xmath39 gev at @xmath330.5 1 3 tev increasing character for cut 10 gev lose character for higher cutsthree distributions in figs- f5 have decreasing characters jacobian peaks around 150 - 200 gev for cut value 80 gev pair production heavy leptons in @xmath2 through @xmath7-channel flavor changing neutral current process @xmath40 differential cross section by @xmath41^2m^4 + total cross sections heavy lepton masses @xmath24 displayed in fig f6 signal background cross sections heavy lepton masses presented in tables t5 t6 at 0.5 1 3 tev pair production heavy leptons at linear colliders @xmath42 signal events for 1250 gev leptons for coupling value @xmath43 lower limit coupling 0.05 applied initial cut on electron jet transverse momentum @xmath44 gev for signal background analysis fig f7 shows @xmath37 distributions background at colliders distribution of invariant mass @xmath45 in figs at @xmath330.5 1 3 used high energy package comphep for calculations background cross sections linear colliders test single pair production heavy leptons production single heavy lepton more relevant than pair production@xmath1 option expect 257 events @xmath43 26 @xmath34 2750 gev upper bound leptons pair production @xmath43 @xmath42 events 1250 gev upper value leptons no pair event @xmath34 pair production suppressed fourth power mixing couplings j l. hewett t g. rizzo . 183 *, 193 ( 1989 ) l. almeida j. h. lopes j a. martins simoes m. porto 44 * 2836 ( 1991 ) lopes martins simoes. queiroz filho j. ramalho 51 * 5990 ( 1995 ) almeida coutinho j. martins simoes b. do vale 63 * 075005 ( 2001 ) almeida coutinho martins simoes wulck. do vale 30 * 327 ( 2003 ) frampton d. ng m. sher y. yuan phys 48 * 3128 ( 1993 ) coutinho j. martins simoes. porto queiroz filho 57 * 6975 ( 1998 ) cieza montalvo p.queiroz filho phys d 66 055003 2002 ) rizzo phys b 188 95 ( 1987 ) alan tasci cakir phys . b 35 2199 2004 ) akrawy opal collaboration phys . b 240 250 ( 1990 ) decamp aleph collaboration phys 216 253 1992 ) ahmed h1 collaboration . b 340 205 ( 1994 ) accomando clic physics working group hep - ph/0412251 international linear collider technical review report ilc - trc/2003 report 2003.slac.stanford.edu bamert burgess maksymyk b 356 282 ( 1995 ) almeida coutinho martins simoes do vale phys . d 62 * 075004 ( 2000 ) e. nardi roulet d. tommasini phys . b * 327 319 ( 1994 ) pukhov comphep evaluation feynman diagrams integration multi - particle phase space hep - ph/9908288
| 0.357943
| 2,742
| 1,374
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,039
|
the existence of @xmath0-mesic nuclei in which the @xmath0 meson is bound in a nucleus by means of the strong interaction was postulated already in 1986 , albeit not yet confirmed it by experiment .
the discovery of this new kind of an exotic nuclear matter would be very important as it might allow for a better understanding of the @xmath0 meson structure and its interaction with nucleons .
the search for @xmath0-mesic helium ( @xmath1-@xmath0 ) is carried out with high statistics and high acceptance with the wasa detector , installed at the cooler synchrotron cosy of the research center jlich .
the search is conducted via the measurement of the excitation function for selected decay channels of the @xmath1-@xmath0 system . in the experiment , performed in november 2010 , two reactions @xmath2-@xmath3 @xmath4 and @xmath2-@xmath3 @xmath5 were measured with a beam momentum ramped from 2.127gev / c to 2.422gev / c .
the report includes the description of the experimental method and status of the measurement .
|
as early as 1985 , bhalerao and liu @xcite performed a coupled - channel analysis of the @xmath6 , @xmath7 , and @xmath8 reactions in the close - to - threshold region , and discovered that the interaction between the nucleon and the @xmath0 meson is attractive .
this finding inspired haider and liu to postulate the existence of @xmath0-mesic nuclei @xcite , in which the neutral @xmath0 meson might be bound with nucleons via the strong interaction .
the existence of @xmath0-mesic bound states would allow to investigate the interaction of the @xmath0 meson and nucleons inside a nuclear matter .
moreover , it would provide information about the @xmath9 resonance @xcite and about the @xmath0 meson properties in a nuclear matter @xcite , as well as about contribution of the flavour singlet component of the quark - gluon wave function of the @xmath0 meson @xcite . according to theoretical considerations
, the formation of the @xmath0-mesic nucleus can only take place if the real part of the @xmath0-nucleus scattering length is negative ( attractive nature of the interaction ) , and the magnitude of the real part is greater than the magnitude of the imaginary part @xcite : @xmath10 + a wide range of possible values of the s - wave @xmath0n scattering length , from @xmath11=(0.27 + 0.22i ) fm up to @xmath11=(1.05 + 0.27i ) fm , calculated for hadronic- and photoproduction of the @xmath0 meson has not excluded the formation of @xmath0-nucleus bound states for a light nuclei as @xmath12 , t @xcite and even for deuteron @xcite .
those bound states have been searched for in many experiments @xcite , however none of them gave empirical confirmation of their existence .
there are only a promising experimental observations which might be interpreted as of @xmath0-mesic nuclei .
for example , experimental observations which might suggest the possibility of the existence of the @xmath13-@xmath0 bound system were found by @xcite , @xcite , anke @xcite and @xcite collaborations .
the data analysis of the close to threshold spes-4 and spes-2 measurements of the total cross led to the determination of the @xmath14 scattering length which , within the experimental errors , fulfill the condition given by eq . [ eq : eq1 ] . in the experiments conducted at the cosy
synchrotron the momentum ramping technique of the deuteron beam was used that allows to reduce the systematic uncertainties @xcite .
the beam was accelerated slowly and linearly in time , from excess energy of up to in case of the anke experiment @xcite , while during the experiment @xcite the momentum was varied in the range corresponding to the excess energy from to .
both collaborations performed the measurement of the excitation function and differential cross section of the reaction close to the kinematical threshold .
data taken by the cosy-11 group were used to search for a signal of a @xmath13-@xmath0 bound state below the @xmath0 production threshold of the @xmath15 and @xmath16 @xmath17 reactions @xcite , while the measurements above the threshold enabled the study of the forward - backward asymmetries of the differential cross sections and the extraction of the @xmath0-@xmath13 scattering length .
the data of both groups @xcite show a variation in the phase of the s - wave amplitude in the near - threshold region , consistent with possible existence of a bound state @xcite .
the first direct experimental indications of light @xmath0-nucleus bound states were observed in @xmath0 photoproduction @xmath18@xmath19 which was carried out by the taps collaboration @xcite .
the measurements of the excitation functions for two ranges of the relative angle between @xmath20 and proton were carried out .
it appeared that a difference between those excitation curves in the center - of - mass frame revealed an enhancement just below the threshold of the @xmath21 @xmath13-@xmath0 reaction which was interpreted as a possible signature of a @xmath13-@xmath0 bound state where @xmath0 meson captured by one of nucleons inside helium forms an intermediate @xmath22 resonance which decays into @xmath20-@xmath23 pair .
however , it was shown later that the result may be an artefact due to the strong influence of the resonances on the shape of the excitation function @xcite .
therefore , a new high - statictics exclusive measurement is necessary .
the measurement of the @xmath1-@xmath0 bound states is performed with high precision at the cosy accelerator with the wasa detection system .
signatures of the nuclei are searched for in the excitation function of specific decay channels of the system , formed in deuteron - deuteron collision @xcite .
the measurement is performed for beam momenta varying continously around the @xmath0 meson production threshold .
the beam ramping technique allows to reduce the systematic uncertainities .
the of the bound system should manifest itself as a resonance structure in the excitation curve of eg .
@xmath4 reaction below the @xmath24 @xmath1-@xmath0 reaction threshold .
the kinematics of the reaction is schematically presented in fig .
[ fig1 ] .
the deuteron beam - deuteron target collision leads to fusion into a @xmath1 nucleus in a bound state with the @xmath0 meson .
the @xmath0 meson can be absorbed by one of the nucleons inside the helium and may propagate in the nucleus via consecutive excitation of nucleons to the @xmath25 state @xcite until the resonance decays into a pion - proton pair emitted by the nucleus @xcite .
the relative angle between p and @xmath26 is equal to @xmath27 in the @xmath28 reference frame and it is smeared by about @xmath29 in the center - of - mass frame due to the fermi motion of the nucleons inside the helium nucleus .
-@xmath30 production and decay.[fig1],width=585,height=283 ] in june 2008 , the search for the @xmath1-@xmath0 bound state was performed by measuring the excitation function of the @xmath24 @xmath4 reaction near the @xmath0 production threshold . during the experimental run the momentum of the deuteron beam
was varied continuously within each acceleration cycle from 2.185 gev / c to 2.400 gev / c , crossing the kinematic threshold for the @xmath0 production in the @xmath24 @xmath31 reaction at 2.336 gev / c .
this range of beam momenta corresponds to a variation of @xmath1-@xmath0 excess energy from -51.4 mev to 22 mev .
the excitation function was determined after applying cuts on the p and @xmath26 kinetic energy distribution and the @xmath32 opening angle in the cm system @xcite .
the result is shown in fig .
[ fig2 ] .
@xmath4 reaction obtained by normalizing events selected in individual excess energy intervals by corresponding integrated luminosities .
the solid line represents a fit with second order polynomial combined with a breit - wigner function with fixed binding energy and a width equal to -10 and 10 mev , respectively .
the dotted line corresponds to the contribution from the second order polynomial in the performed fit.[fig2],width=340,height=226 ] the relative normalization of the @xmath24 @xmath4 excitation function was based on quasi - elastic proton - proton scattering .
the excitation function does not show a structure which could be interpreted as a resonance originating from the decay of an @xmath0-mesic @xmath1 . in the experiment , in november 2010
, two channels were measured : @xmath2-@xmath3 @xmath4 and @xmath2-@xmath3 @xmath33 @xmath34 .
the measurement was performed with a beam momentum ramping from 2.127gev / c to 2.422gev / c , corresponding to the range of the excess energy . for both reactions
the geometrical acceptance of the detector as a function of excess energy q was determined in simulations .
the acceptance is presented in fig .
[ reakcja_1 ] for different widths of the presumed bound state and using the av18 model description of the nucleon momentum distribution inside the @xmath35 nuclei .
the detailed description of the simulations is presented in ref .
@xcite .
-@xmath3 @xmath4 ( left ) and @xmath2-@xmath3 @xmath33 @xmath34 reaction ( right ) .
the acceptance is calculated for different widths of the presumed bound state and using the av18 potential model description of the nucleon momentum distribution inside @xmath1 .
[ reakcja_1],title="fig:",width=302,height=283 ] -@xmath3 @xmath4 ( left ) and @xmath2-@xmath3 @xmath33 @xmath34 reaction ( right ) .
the acceptance is calculated for different widths of the presumed bound state and using the av18 potential model description of the nucleon momentum distribution inside @xmath1 .
[ reakcja_1],title="fig:",width=302,height=283 ] the acceptance is almost a constant function of the excess energy and its average value is about 53% and 50% for and @xmath2-@xmath3 @xmath33 @xmath34 , respectively .
the high acceptance values allow high statistics measurements of these final states @xcite . during the experiment in 2010
, data were effectively taken for about 155 hours .
the average luminosity was estimated based on the trigger used for the elastic proton - proton scattering and is about l=8.15@xmath36 .
taking into account the fact that two reactions were measured , in total more than 40 times higher statistics were collected than in the experiment carried out in 2008 .
the search for @xmath1-@xmath0 bound states is performed with the wasa - at - cosy facility by taking advantage of its very high acceptance for the proton-@xmath26 and neutron-@xmath20 pairs as well as very good identification of helium nuclei .
in addition , wasa allows an exclusive measurement of the @xmath24 @xmath4 reaction .
+ at present the data analysis is in progress . in the optimistic case , the statistics could be sufficient to observe a signal from the @xmath0-mesic helium and in a pessimistic scenario the upper limit of the cross section for the @xmath1-@xmath0 bound state production will be decreased by a factor of about six .
the work is supported by the foundation for polish science - mpd program , co - financed by the european union within the european regional development fund , by the polish national science center through grants no .
0320/b / h03/2011/40 and 2011/01/b / st2/00431 , by the european commission under the 7th framework programme through the research infrastructures action of the capacities programme ( fp7-infrastructures-2008 - 1 , grant agreement n. 227431 ) and by the ffe grants of the research center jlich . + r.s .
bhalerao , l.c .
liu , q. haider , l.c .
liu , d. jido , h. nagahiro , s. hirenzaki , t. inoue , e. oset , s. d. bass , a. w. thomas , s. d. bass , a. w. thomas , _ acta phys .
_ b 41 ( 2010 ) q. haider , l. c. liu , c. wilkin , s. wycech , a. m. green and j. a. niskanen , a. m. green , h. machner , _ acta phys .
_ b 41 ( 2010 ) 2221 g. a. sokol , _ et al .
, arxiv : nucl - ex/0012010 _ ( 2000 ) a. gillitzer , _ acta .
slovaca _ 56 ( 2006 ) 269 j. berger _
et al . _ , b. mayer _ et al . _ , t. mersmann _ et al .
_ , j. smyrski _ et al .
_ , p. moskal , j. smyrski , _ acta phys .
_ b 41 ( 2010 ) 2281 j. smyrski _ et al .
, acta phys .
slovaca _ 56 ( 2006 )
213 w. krzemie _
et al . , int . j. mod
. phys . _ a 24 ( 2009 ) 576 j. smyrski _ et al .
_ , c. wilkin , m. pfeiffer _
et al . _ ,
b. krusche _
et al , _ _ acta phys .
_ b41 ( 2010 ) 2249 p. moskal _ et al .
phys . _ a 22 ( 2007 ) 305 w. krzemie , _ arxiv:1101.3103 _ ( 2011 ) g. a. sokol _
et al . , arxiv : nucl - ex/0106005 _ ( 2001 ) p. moskal , _
arxiv:0909.3979 _ ( 2009 ) w. krzemie , p. moskal , j. smyrski , _ acta phys .
_ 2 ( 2009 ) 141 w. krzemie , _ phd thesis , jagiellonian university _ ( 2011 ) m. skurzok , _ diploma thesis , jagiellonian university of cracow _ ( 2010 ) , berichte des fz - jlich , jl-4332 ( 2010 ) ,
_ arxiv:1009.5503 _ ( 2010 )
|
1985 bhalerao liu performed coupled - channel analysis @xmath6 @xmath8 reactions close - to - threshold region discovered interaction between nucleon @xmath0 meson attractive inspired haider liu postulate existence @xmath0-mesic nuclei neutral @xmath0 meson bound with nucleons strong interaction existence @xmath0-mesic bound states investigate interaction meson nucleons nuclear matter information about @xmath9 resonance @xmath0 meson properties in nuclear matter contribution flavour singlet component quark - gluon wave function formation @xmath0-mesic nucleus if real part scattering length negative attractive interaction magnitude real part greater than imaginary part range values s - wave @xmath0n scattering length from @xmath11=(0.27 + 0.22i ) fm up to=(1.05 + 0.27i ) fm- photoproduction excluded formation of @xmath0-nucleus bound states for light nuclei @xmath12 t deuteron bound states searched for in many experiments none empirical confirmation promising experimental observations @xmath0-mesic nucleiexperimental observations @xmath13-@xmath0 bound system found by @xcite anke collaborations data analysis of threshold spes-4 spes-2 measurements led to @xmath14 scattering length condition by eq in experiments at cosy synchrotron momentum ramping technique deuteron beam used systematic uncertainties beam accelerated slowly linearly from excess energy momentum varied excess energy collaborations excitation function differential cross section reaction close to kinematical threshold data cosy-11 group used for signal @xmath13-@xmath0 bound state below production threshold of reactions measurements above threshold enabled study forward - backward asymmetries differential cross sections extraction of @xmath0-@xmath13 scattering length data groups show variation in phase s - wave amplitude in near - threshold region consistent with possible existence bound state first indications of light @xmath0-nucleus bound states observed in @xmath0 photoproduction @xmath18@xmath19 carried by collaboration @xcite measurements of excitation functions relative angle between @xmath20 and proton carried outdifference between excitation curves revealed enhancement below threshold @xmath21 @xmath13-@xmath0 reaction possible signature of @xmath13-@xmath0 bound state meson captured by forms intermediate @xmath22 resonance decays into @xmath20-@xmath23 pair result may artefact due influence resonances on excitation function new high - statictics measurement necessary measurement @xmath1-@xmath0 bound states performed high precision at cosy accelerator with wasa detection system signatures nuclei searched for in excitation function decay channels collision measurement for beam momenta around @xmath0 meson production threshold beam ramping technique uncertainities bound system as resonance structure in excitation curve @xmath4 reaction below @xmath24 @xmath1-@xmath0 reaction threshold kinematics presented in fig . deuteron beam - deuteron target collision leads to fusion into @xmath1 nucleus in bound state with @xmath0 meson meson absorbed by to @xmath25 state until decays into pion - proton pairangle between p @xmath26 equal to @xmath27 smeared by @xmath29 center frame due motion nucleons helium nucleus@xmath30 production decay june 2008 search for @xmath1-@xmath0 bound state excitation function @xmath24 reaction near production threshold momentum deuteron beam varied from 2.185 to 2.400 gev c crossing kinematic threshold reaction 2.336 gev / c variation @xmath1-@xmath0 excess energy from -51.4 mev to 22 mev excitation function determined after cuts on p @xmath26 kinetic energy distribution @xmath32 opening angle system result shown in fig . @xmath4 reaction normalizing events excess energy intervals luminosities solid line represents fit with second order polynomial breit - wigner function fixed binding energy width equal to -10 10 mev dotted line contribution second order polynomial=340 normalization @xmath24 @xmath4 excitation function based on quasi - elastic proton - scattering structure resonance from decay @xmath0-mesic @xmath1experiment november 2010 two channels measured @xmath2-@xmath3 @xmath4 measurement beam momentum ramping 2.127gev to 2.422gev / c range excess energy both reactions geometrical acceptance detector function excess energy q determined in simulations acceptance presented in fig . different widths presumed bound state av18 model description nucleon momentum distribution @xmath35 nuclei detailed description simulations ref .@xmath3 @xmath4 left @xmath2- reaction right acceptance calculated different widths av18 potential model description nucleon momentum distribution @xmath1@xmath3 @xmath4 left @xmath2- @xmath34 reaction right acceptance calculated different widths bound state av18 potential model description nucleon momentum distribution @xmath1 acceptance constant function excess energy average value 53% and 50% for @xmath2- @xmath34 high acceptance values allow high statistics measurements final states experiment 2010 data taken 155 hours average luminosity estimated trigger elastic proton - proton scattering about l=8.15@xmath36two reactions measured 40 times higher statistics collected than 2008 search for @xmath1-@xmath0 bound states performed with wasa - at - cosy facility high acceptance for proton-@xmath26 neutron-@xmath20 pairs good identification of helium nuclei wasa allows exclusive measurement of @xmath24 @xmath4 reaction data analysis in progress optimistic statistics sufficient to signal from @xmath0-mesic helium pessimistic scenario upper limit cross section for @xmath1-@xmath0 bound state production decreased by six work supported by foundation for polish science - mpd program co - financed by european union fund polish national science center grants 0320/b / h03/2011/40 2011/01/b / st2/00431 european commission 7th framework programme research infrastructures programme grant agreement 227431 ffe grants research center bhalerao l liu haider jido nagahiro hirenzaki inoue oset d. bass thomas acta phys . 41 ( 2010 ) q haider liu wilkin wycech m. green niskanenmachner acta phys . b 41 2010 ) 2221 sokol arxiv nucl - ex/0012010 2000 gillitzer acta slovaca 56 ( 2006 ) 269 berger mayer mersmann j smyrski moskal smyrski acta phys . b 41 2010 ) 2281 smyrski acta phys slovaca 56 ( 2006 ) 213 krzemie mod 24 ( 2009 ) 576 j smyrski wilkin pfeiffer krusche acta phys . b41 2010 ) 2249 moskal 22 ( 2007 ) 305 krzemie arxiv:1101.3103 2011 ) g a. sokol nucl - ex/0106005 2001 moskal arxiv:0909.3979 2009 ) krzemie moskal j smyrski acta . 2 ( 2009 ) 141 krzemie phd thesis jagiellonian university 2011 ) skurzok diploma thesis jagiellonian university cracow 2010 ) berichte fz - jl-4332 ( 2010 ) arxiv:1009.5503
| 0.441066
| 3,210
| 1,605
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,058
|
a quantum system at equilibrium is represented by a corresponding classical system , chosen to reproduce the thermodynamic and structural properties .
the objective is to develop a means for exploiting strong coupling classical methods ( e.g. , md , integral equations , dft ) to describe quantum systems .
the classical system has an effective temperature , local chemical potential , and pair interaction that are defined by requiring equivalence of the grand potential and its functional derivatives with respect to the external and pair potentials for the classical and quantum systems .
practical inversion of this mapping for the classical properties is effected via the hypernetted chain approximation , leading to representations as functionals of the quantum pair correlation function . as an illustration ,
the parameters of the classical system are determined approximately such that ideal gas and weak coupling rpa limits are preserved .
|
a simple atomic system in its liquid state is a prototypical strongly coupled system with no small expansion parameters available to simplify calculations . under conditions where classical mechanics is applicable
there are a number of theoretical and computational methods available to address such strong coupling conditions .
these include integral equation and density functional methods , and numerical techniques such as molecular dynamics ( md ) and monte carlo ( mc ) simulation . for quantum systems
there are complementary many - body methods to address the new features of diffraction and exchange or degeneracy effects
. conditions of both quantum degeneracy and strong coupling pose challenging problems with few choices for accurate computation of properties sensitive to both features ( e.g. , diffusion and path integral monte carlo ( pimc ) simulation ) .
one approach to describe such quantum systems is to extend the classical methods in a phenomenological way .
for example , md has been used with effective potentials modified to include short range diffraction effects @xcite . a related approach , wave packet md , uses a similar variant of classical mechanics to define trajectories guiding wave - packets .
an interesting new approach is to use classical integral equations for pair correlations modified to include an effective potential and an effective temperature dharma00 .
quantum effects are imbedded in these effective properties , while strong correlations are generated by the classical form of the integral equation . a surprisingly wide class of quantum systems
have been described in this way with considerable success @xcite .
the objective here is to formalize the exploitation of classical methods by defining a classical statistical mechanics whose equilibrium properties are the same as those for an underlying quantum system .
the exact definition is given in the next section , providing the basis for the introduction of practical approximations .
one simple realization of electron gas as a classical system is described in the following sections .
the emphasis here is on the definition of the mapping and its approximate evaluation .
applications will be described elsewhere .
consider for simplicity a one component system at equilibrium represented in the grand canonical ensemble .
the grand potential @xmath0 is proportional to the pressure and is given by@xmath1here @xmath2 denotes a trace over properly symmetrized @xmath3 particle states .
the thermodynamics for the system is specified as functions of the inverse temperature @xmath4 and functionals of the local chemical potential @xmath5 ( an external potential has been included for generality ) and pair potential @xmath6 .
the hamiltonian @xmath7 contains the kinetic energy @xmath8 and sum over pair potentials : @xmath9 .
a corresponding classical system is considered with hamiltonian @xmath10 in the same volume @xmath11 at equilibrium described by the classical grand canonical ensemble , with inverse temperature @xmath12 and local chemical potential @xmath13 .
the hamiltonian has the same form except the potential energy functions @xmath14 and @xmath15 are different .
the classical grand potential is defined in terms of these quantities by@xmath16here , @xmath17 is the thermal de broglie wavelength associated with the classical temperature .
the integration for the partition function is taken over the @xmath3 particle configuration space .
the classical system has undefined ingredients : the effective inverse temperature , @xmath18 , the local chemical potential , @xmath19 , and the pair potential for interaction among the particles , @xmath14 .
a correspondence between the classical and quantum systems is defined by expressing these quantities as functions or functionals of @xmath4 , @xmath20 , and @xmath21 .
this is accomplished by requiring the numerical equivalence of two independent thermodynamic properties and one structural property .
the first two are chosen to be the equivalence of the grand potential and its first functional derivative with respect to the local chemical potential .
@xmath22an equivalent form for these conditions can be given in terms of the pressure and density@xmath23these two relations provide two independent relations between @xmath18 , @xmath24 and the physical variables @xmath4 and @xmath25 .
it remains to have a structural equivalence to relate the pair potential @xmath14 to @xmath26 , which are two particle functions .
this is accomplished by equating the functional derivatives of the grand potentials with respect to these pair potentials@xmath27an equivalent form for this definition is the equivalence of pair correlation functions@xmath28 in this way the three equations of ( [ 2.5 ] ) and ( [ 2.7 ] ) determine , formally , the classical parameters @xmath29 @xmath30 and @xmath31 as functions of @xmath32 and functionals of @xmath25 , and @xmath33 : @xmath34 .
this completes the definition of the thermodynamics of a classical system that is representative of that for a given quantum system .
it is also possible to deduce from this a classical density functional theory that is representative of the quantum density functional theory .
this will be discussed elsewhere .
is finite at @xmath35 . , title="fig:",width=302,height=207 ] is finite at @xmath35
. , title="fig:",width=302,height=207 ] exact representations of the classical parameters as functions / functionals of the quantum properties follow from classical density functional theory which has the form@xmath36here @xmath37 and @xmath38 denote formal functionals of the local density and pair correlation function . but according to the definitions ( 2.5 ) and ( [ 2.7 ] ) these can be replaced by their corresponding quantum properties to give the desired result @xmath39 this provides the formal expressions for the classical local chemical potential and classical pair potential in terms of properties of the quantum system , suitable for the introduction of approximations . for example a good approximation to @xmath40 for coulomb systems is the hypernetted chain ( hnc ) form @xmath41 , where @xmath42 is the direct correlation function , defined in terms of @xmath43 by the ornstein - zernicke equation .
it remains to find an equivalent expression for @xmath18 .
this is obtained from the first definition of ( [ 2.5 ] ) and the classical virial equation for the pressure , which has the form @xmath44 \rightarrow \mathcal{k}% \left [ \beta _ { c}\mu _ { c},\beta _ { c}\phi _ { c},g\right ] .
\label{3.4}\]]in the last step @xmath45 has been replaced by @xmath46 according to ( [ 2.7 ] ) . since @xmath47 and @xmath48 are known from ( [ 3.2 ] ) , @xmath49 is given entirely in terms of properties of the quantum system .
an interesting first illustration of this correspondence of classical and quantum system is the uniform ideal fermi gas .
the quantum description of this non - interacting system with only exchange effects is of course simple to analyze .
however , the corresponding classical system is a true many - body problem since those same effects translate into a pair potential among all particles @xcite .
the full many - body problem must be solved to find that effective potential . here
that problem is addressed in terms of the approximate hnc integral equation .
only the results will be given . in figure
( * 1a * ) the classical pair potential is shown as a function of @xmath50 where @xmath51 is the thermal de broglie wavelength defined in terms of the quantum @xmath4 .
a family of curves is given for different values of the degeneracy parameter @xmath52 for the quantum system .
of interest is the development of long range @xmath53 behavior as the temperature is lowered ( large z ) . for this reason the mapping to a classical system requires a uniform neutralizing background to cancel this divergent behavior .
the classical temperature is determined from the virial equation , with @xmath54 defined as above from the hnc integral equation .
this is shown in figure ( * 1b * ) . as expected for @xmath55 while @xmath56 approaches a finite value for @xmath35 .
it is interesting to note that while the pressures of the classical and quantum systems are the same by definition , the internal energies are the same as well .
however , this is true only if the internal energy is defined thermodynamically and not mechanically .
showing the regularization of coulomb potential at the origin and comparison with the kelbg potential.,width=340,height=264 ] [ sec5]a practical classical representation for the uniform interacting electron gas can be obtained in a similar way .
the classical potential is divided into its ideal gas contribution @xmath57 plus a contribution from the coulomb interactions @xmath58 : @xmath59 .
an approximation for the latter is obtained by requiring the correct rpa form at weak coupling . in the classical context
this means that the direct correlation function is given by the classical effective potential .
this is obtained from the ornstein - zernicke equation with the classical @xmath60 replaced by the quantum @xmath54 , according to the definition ( [ 2.7 ] ) , evaluated in the rpa . the final result for the effective classical potential is@xmath61 .
\label{5.1}\]]here @xmath62 is the ideal gas static structure factor and @xmath63 is the rpa structure factor .
it is possible to show that the familiar kelbg potential @xcite is recovered in the weak coupling , low density limit .
figure ( * 2 * ) illustrates the quantum corrections to the bare coulomb form for @xmath64 and @xmath65 ( where @xmath66 is the usual ion sphere radius relative to the bohr radius , and @xmath67 is the fermi temperature ) .
this research has been supported by nsf / doe partnership in basic plasma science and engineering award de - fg02 - 07er54946 nsf / doe , and by us doe grant de - sc0002139 .
|
atomic system liquid state prototypical strongly coupled no small expansion parameters calculations classical mechanics theoretical computational methods address strong coupling conditions include integral equation density functional methods numerical techniques molecular dynamics monte carlo simulation quantum systems complementary many - body methods address new diffraction exchange degeneracy effects quantum degeneracy strong coupling pose challenging problems few choices for accurate computation properties diffusion path integral monte carlo simulation approach systems extend classical methods phenomenological md used with effective potentials short range diffraction effects wave packet md uses classical mechanics trajectories classical integral equations for pair correlations effective potential temperature dharma00 quantum effects imbedded in effective properties strong correlations generated by classical form integral equation wide class quantum systems described success objective formalize exploitation classical methods defining classical statistical mechanics equilibrium properties same as underlying quantum system exact definition next section basis for practical approximations realization of electron gas as classical system described following sections emphasis on definition mapping approximate evaluation applications described elsewhere consider one component system at equilibrium grand canonical ensemblegrand potential @xmath0 proportional to pressure given by@xmath1here @xmath2 trace over symmetrized @xmath3 particle states thermodynamics functions inverse temperature @xmath4 local chemical potential pair potential @xmath6 hamiltonian @xmath7 contains kinetic energy @xmath8 pair potentials corresponding classical system with hamiltonian @xmath10 volume @xmath11 equilibrium classical inverse temperature @xmath12 local chemical potential @xmath13 hamiltonian same form potential energy functions @xmath14 @xmath15 different classical grand potential defined by@xmath16here @xmath17 thermal de broglie wavelength classical temperature integration partition function over @xmath3 particle configuration space classical system undefined ingredients inverse temperature local chemical potential pair potential interaction correspondence between classical quantum systems quantities as functions of @xmath4 @xmath21 equivalence of two thermodynamic properties one structural property first two equivalence grand potential first functional derivative local chemical potential equivalent form pressure density relations independent relations between @xmath18 @xmath24 physical variables @xmath4 @xmath25structural equivalence pair potential @xmath14 to @xmath26 two particle functions accomplished equating functional derivatives grand potentials pair potentials@xmath27an equivalent equivalence pair correlation functions@xmath28 three equations ( [ 2.5 ] ( [ 2.7 ] ) determine classical parameters @xmath29 functions @xmath32 functionals @xmath25 @xmath34 completes definition thermodynamics classical system representative quantum system deduce classical density functional theory representative quantum density functional theory discussed finite at @xmath35 representations classical parameters functions quantum properties from classical density functional theory @xmath37 @xmath38 denote functionals local density pair correlation function definitions ( 2.5 ) [ 2.7 ] ) replaced by quantum properties @xmath39 provides formal expressions classical local chemical potential classical pair potential properties quantum system suitable approximations approximation to @xmath40 for coulomb systems hypernetted chain ( hnc ) form @xmath41 @xmath42 direct correlation function defined by ornstein - zernicke equation equivalent expression for @xmath18 obtained from first definition [ 2.5 ] ) classical virial equation for pressure form @xmath44 \rightarrow \mathcal{k}%\left\beta c}\mu}\phi c},g ]{3.4} @xmath45 replaced by @xmath46 [ 2.7 ] ) @xmath47 @xmath48 known from [ 3.2 ] ) @xmath49 properties quantum system illustration uniform ideal fermi gas non - interacting system exchange effects simple classical system many - body problem effects translate into pair potential among particles full many - body problem solved effective potential addressed approximate hnc integral equation figure ( 1a * ) classical pair potential function of @xmath50 @xmath51 thermal de broglie wavelength quantum @xmath4 family curves for different values degeneracy parameter @xmath52 quantum development long range @xmath53 behavior as temperature lowered mapping to classical system requires uniform neutralizing background classical temperature determined from virial equation @xmath54 hnc integral equation shown in figure ( * 1b * ) @xmath55 @xmath56 approaches finite value for @xmath35pressures classical quantum systems same internal energies same if defined thermodynamically not mechanically regularization coulomb potential origin comparison with kelbg potential classical representation for uniform interacting electron gas classical potential divided into ideal gas contribution @xmath57 coulomb interactions @xmath58 : @xmath59 approximation correct rpa form at weak coupling direct correlation by classical effective potential obtained from ornstein - zernicke equation classical @xmath60 replaced by quantum @xmath54 evaluated in rpa final result effective classical potential is@xmath61 @xmath62 ideal gas static structure factor @xmath63 rpa structure factor kelbg potential recovered in weak coupling low density limit figure illustrates quantum corrections to coulomb form for @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 usual ion sphere radius bohr radius @xmath67 fermi temperature research supported by nsf / doe partnership basic plasma science engineering award - fg02 - 07er54946 doe grant de - sc0002139
| 0.317976
| 2,122
| 1,063
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,070
|
we investigate how entanglement can be transferred between continuous variable and qubit systems .
we find that a two - mode squeezed vacuum state and a continuous variable werner state can be converted to the product states of infinitive number of two - qubit states while keeping the entanglement .
the reverse process is also possible .
pacs : 03.67.mn;03.65.ud
|
quantum information processing ( qip ) has been extensively studied for a qubit system which is a quantum extension of a bit , spanning two - dimensional hilbert space .
a qubit is realized by a electronic spin , a two - level atom , the polarization of a photon and a superconductor among others .
parallelly , much attentions have been paid to the qip of quantum continuous variable ( cv ) system which is a quantum extension of analog information in classical information theory .
cv physical systems such as a harmonic oscillator , a rotator and a light field are defined in infinitive - dimensional hilbert space .
while conversions of analog to digital ( a / d ) and digital to analog ( d / a ) are quite usual in information processing , qubit and cv systems are nearly always treated separately .
there have been some pilot works on how to entangle two separate qubits by an entangled gaussian field , the efficient of the transfer is not high @xcite .
we would propose a scheme of perfect transferring the entanglement in this paper .
the two - mode squeezed vacuum state @xmath0 , where @xmath1 with @xmath2 the squeezing parameter .
the entanglement of the state is @xmath3 @xmath4 .
the interaction between different systems can cause the transfer of entanglement between the systems .
the scheme of the system considered is that two individual qubits each interacting with one entangled part of the field . the whole system will evolve in the way of @xmath5 , where @xmath6 $ ] is the evolution operator in interaction picture , and @xmath7 @xmath8is the initial state of the cv system while @xmath9 is the initial state of the qubit system .
firstly suppose the model hamiltonian of entanglement transfer from cv system to qubit system or vice versa is @xmath10 where @xmath11 and @xmath12 are the photon annihilation and generation operators respectively , @xmath13 , @xmath14 and @xmath15 are operators which convert the atom ( the qubit ) from its excited state @xmath16 to ground state @xmath17 and from ground state to excited state respectively .
the hamiltonian ( [ wave1 ] ) can be considered as a kind of nonlinear jaynes - cummings model@xcite @xcite . then @xmath18\left| m,-\right\rangle = \cos ( m\omega t_1)\left| m,-\right\rangle -i\sin ( m\omega t_1)\left| m-1,+\right\rangle .$ ] if the interaction time @xmath19 is adjusted in such a way that @xmath20
then @xmath18\left| 2m,-\right\rangle = ( -1)^m\left| 2m,-\right\rangle $ ] and @xmath21\left| 2m+1,-\right\rangle = -i(-1)^m\left| 2m,+\right\rangle .$ ] apply the evolution operator @xmath22 $ ] to the state@xmath23 , we have @xmath24 with @xmath25 and @xmath26 it should be noticed that the state after evolution is a product state of cv system state and two qubit state .
the cv state @xmath27 has even number of photons in each mode .
we can separate the two qubit state @xmath28 from the combined state , then append another vacuum two qubit state @xmath29of @xmath30 partite to state @xmath31 , the new state will be @xmath32 we would design another interaction hamiltonian to assign the entanglement of cv state to two qubit state
. the hamiltonian will be @xmath33the evolution will be @xmath34 with the interaction time @xmath35 @xmath36 , and @xmath37 , @xmath38 then we move from the second two qubit to the vacuum state of the third two qubit of @xmath30 partite and so on .
the @xmath39 hamiltonian will be @xmath40 $ ] and interaction time @xmath41 the whole state reads @xmath42 with @xmath43 , @xmath44 the entanglement transferred to qubits system is @xmath45 \\ & = & \log \frac{1-\lambda ^{2^{k+1}}}{1-\lambda
^2}-(\frac{\lambda ^2}{% 1-\lambda ^2}-\frac{2^k\lambda ^{2^{k+1}}}{1-\lambda ^{2^{k+1}}})\log \lambda ^2 .
\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the entanglement remained at the cv system is @xmath46the total entanglement remains unchanged for each @xmath47 , @xmath48when @xmath49 @xmath50 , thus @xmath51 the entanglement transferred to the qubit system tends to @xmath52 .
the entanglement is perfectly transferred .
the entanglement transfer is depicted in fig.1 for different value of receiving qubit pair number @xmath47 .
in the reverse conversion , we have the initial state @xmath53 @xmath54 , where @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 .
the process of entanglement transfer is to transfer firstly the higher qubit pair ( @xmath58 to the cv bipartite state then the lower .
the result of conversion will be @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 where @xmath65 @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70with @xmath71 @xmath72and @xmath73 we denoted @xmath74 for later use .
the entanglement of the state @xmath63 is equal to that of a state @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 , thus it is equal to the sum of entanglements of qubit pairs .
we have @xmath78 the conversion procedure will convert a general qubit pair product state @xmath79 into a continuous variable state @xmath80 while keeping the entanglement due to local unitary operations .
the process of reverse entanglement conversion is to convert firstly the highest two qubits @xmath81 to the cv system then the lower .
the combined state will evolve to @xmath82 where @xmath83 is the initial state of the field ( @xmath84 and @xmath85 bipartite ) . since @xmath86 the evolution time is so chosen that @xmath87 we choose @xmath88 as before
. then @xmath89 @xmath90 .
the first step evolution will be @xmath91 @xmath92 where @xmath93 $ ] as before .
the basis of @xmath94 are @xmath95 with @xmath96 or @xmath97 we see that all the information of qubit state @xmath98 is transferred to the field , leave the two qubit state a definite blank state .
moreover , the combined state is a direct product of the field and two qubit state , thus the @xmath99 qubit pair can be dropped after the evolution .
the next step is to transfer @xmath100to the remained field @xmath101 .
since when @xmath102 we have the state after the evolution will be @xmath103 the basis of @xmath104 are @xmath105 with @xmath106 or @xmath97 the quantum state of a pair of the two qubits @xmath107 @xmath98 are transferred to @xmath108 when all the two qubits are transferred to the field , we get at last a bipartite quantum cv state @xmath109 while leaving all the two qubit series in the lower energy level state @xmath110 thus the reverse conversion procedure will convert a general qubit pair product state @xmath111 into a continuous variable bipartite state @xmath112 while keeping the entropy of the whole state .
this is due to the fact that local unitary transformation does not change the entanglement .
we here divide the system into @xmath113 and @xmath114 subsystems .
the reverse conversion is perfect .
cv werner state is a mixture of the two mode squeezed vacuum state and the two mode thermal state @xcite @xmath115 where @xmath116 the sufficient conditions of inseparability and separability as well as other physical properties have been displayed .
denote partial transposed state of @xmath117 as @xmath118 the eigenvalues of @xmath119 are @xcite @xmath120 the logarithmic negativity ( ln ) as an entanglement measure of the state @xmath121 can be calculated @xcite .
the entanglement measured by ln is @xmath122 where @xmath123tr@xmath124 in the simplest case of @xmath125 ( although ln can be worked out for any values of the parameters ) , the inseparable condition is @xmath126we have @xmath127.\ ] ] the conversion of the cv werner state to a serial of two qubits system leads to the result state @xmath128 where @xmath129 and @xmath130 is the similar . for convenience ,
we denote @xmath17 and @xmath131 as @xmath132 and @xmath133 then the basis of @xmath134 system ( as well as @xmath135 system ) can be denoted as @xmath136 with @xmath137 the basis can be further simplified as @xmath138 with @xmath139 thus @xmath140 the partially transposed matrix @xmath141 has a block diagonal form with @xmath142blocks in one - dimensional subspaces spanned by vectors @xmath143 , @xmath144 and @xmath145 blocks in two - dimensional subspaces spanned by vectors @xmath146 , @xmath147 consequently , the eigenvalues of the partially transposed matrix @xmath141 can easily be calculated as roots of quadratic equations and read @xmath148 after the conversion , the entanglement measured by ln for the case of @xmath149 will be @xmath150.\ ] ] the entanglement transfer is shown in fig.2 for different value of receiving qubit pair number @xmath47 .
the entanglement of continuous variable system can be converted to the entanglement of a serial of qubit pairs .
the conversion error can be made arbitary low if the series is long enough . the reverse conversion is perfect as far as the different qubit pairs are not correlated before the reverse conversion . for a typical two mode squeezed vacuum state prepared in laboratary ( the squeezing parameter @xmath151 )
, the qubit system with eight pairs of qubits is sufficiently good in simulation of the original cvsystem .
this is indicated by our calculations of the entanglement transfer of two mode squeezed vaccum state or cv werner state . in quantum information theory ,
the entanglement of two qubits changes from @xmath152 to @xmath153 this flexibility makes the error of conversion quite small as we can see from the figures .
funding by the national natural science foundation of china ( grant no .
10575092,10347119 ) , zhejiang province natural science foundation ( grant no
. rc104265 ) and aqsiq of china ( grant no .
2004qk38 ) are gratefully acknowledged .
|
quantum information processing studied for qubit system quantum extension of bit two - dimensional hilbert space qubit realized by electronic spin two - level atom polarization photon superconductor paid to quantum continuous variable cv ) system quantum extension of analog information in classical information theory cv physical systems harmonic oscillator rotator light field defined in infinitive - dimensional hilbert space conversions of analog to digital digital to analog usual qubit cv systems treated separately pilot works entangle two qubits by entangled gaussian field transfer not high propose scheme transferring entanglement two - mode squeezed vacuum state @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2 squeezing parameter entanglement is @xmath3 @xmath4 interaction between systems transfer of entanglement two qubits interacting with one entangled part field system @xmath5 @xmath6 evolution operator initial state of cv system @xmath9 initial state qubit systemmodel hamiltonian entanglement transfer from cv system to qubit system @xmath10 @xmath11 photon annihilation generation operators convert atom qubit from excited state to ground state hamiltonian wave1 nonlinear jaynes - cummings model@xcite @xmath18\left m,-\right\rangle = t_1 interaction time @xmath19 adjusted @xmath20 2m,-\right\rangle = -1)^m\left @xmath21 2m+1\rangle = -i(-1)^m\left apply evolution operator @xmath22 to state@xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 state after evolution product of cv system state two qubit state cv state @xmath27 has even number photons each mode separate two qubit state @xmath28 from combined state append another vacuum two qubit state @xmath29of @xmath30 state @xmath31 new state @xmath32 design another interaction hamiltonian assign entanglement cv state to two qubit statehamiltonian @xmath33the evolution @xmath34 interaction time @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 move second qubit to vacuum state third two qubit @xmath30 partite @xmath39 hamiltonian @xmath40 interaction time @xmath41 whole state @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 entanglement transferred to qubits system @xmath45\lambda entanglement cv system @xmath46the total entanglement unchanged @xmath47 @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 entanglement transferred qubit system @xmath52 entanglement transferred entanglement transfer depicted.1 different value receiving qubit pair number @xmath47 reverse conversion initial state @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 process entanglement transfer higher qubit pair @xmath58 cv bipartite state lowerresult conversion @xmath59 @xmath71 denoted @xmath74 for later use entanglement state @xmath63 equal @xmath75 equal sum entanglements qubit pairs @xmath78 conversion procedure general qubit pair product state @xmath79 into continuous variable state @xmath80 entanglement local unitary operations reverse entanglement conversion convert highest two qubits @xmath81 to cv system lower combined state to @xmath82 @xmath83 initial state field @xmath84 @xmath85 bipartite @xmath86 evolution time @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 first step evolution @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath93 basis @xmath94 @xmath95 @xmath96 @xmath97 information qubit state @xmath98 transferred to field two qubit state blank combined state direct product of field two qubit state @xmath99 qubit pair dropped after evolution next transfer @xmath100to remained field @xmath101@xmath102 state after evolution @xmath103 basis @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 @xmath97 quantum state qubits @xmath107 @xmath98 transferred to @xmath108 bipartite quantum cv state @xmath109 qubit series lower energy state @xmath110 reverse conversion qubit pair product state @xmath111 into continuous variable bipartite state @xmath112 entropy state local unitary transformation change entanglement divide system into @xmath113 @xmath114 subsystems reverse conversion perfect cv werner state two mode squeezed vacuum mode thermal state @xmath115 @xmath116 conditions inseparability separability physical properties partial transposed state @xmath117 @xmath118 eigenvalues @xmath119 @xcite @xmath120 logarithmic negativity ln entanglement measure @xmath121 calculated @xcite entanglement measured ln @xmath122 @xmath123tr@xmath124 @xmath125 inseparable condition @xmath127 conversion cv werner state serial two qubits system result state @xmath128 @xmath129 @xmath130 similardenote @xmath17 @xmath131 as @xmath132 @xmath133 basis of @xmath134 system @xmath135 system denoted as @xmath136 with @xmath137 basis simplified as @xmath138 with @xmath139 @xmath140 matrix @xmath141 block diagonal form @xmath142blocks one - dimensional subspaces @xmath143 blocks two - dimensional subspaces @xmath146 eigenvalues @xmath141 calculated as roots of quadratic equations @xmath148 after conversion entanglement measured by ln @xmath149 @xmath150. entanglement transfer shown in fig.2 for qubit pair number @xmath47 entanglement continuous variable system converted to serial qubit pairs conversion error low if series long reverse conversion perfect qubit pairs not correlated typical two mode squeezed vacuum state @xmath151 qubit system with eight pairs qubits good in simulation original cvsystem calculations entanglement transfer quantum information theory entanglement of two qubits changes from @xmath152 to @xmath153 error of conversion small funding by national natural science foundation china zhejiang province natural science foundationrc104265 aqsiq china grant 2004qk38 acknowledged
| 0.421928
| 2,478
| 1,307
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,076
|
in this article we prove that for any complete toric variety , and for any cartier divisor , the ring of global sections of multiples of the line bundle associated to the divisor is finitely generated .
|
let us start by stating the result and a few consequences .
let @xmath0 be an algebraic variety which is complete over a field @xmath1 , and let @xmath2 be any effective cartier divisor on @xmath3 we denote by @xmath4 the line bundle associated to @xmath5 with @xmath6 it is a very interesting problem to know if the ring @xmath7 is a finitely generated @xmath1-algebra .
it was o. zariski who worked out the case of algebraic surfaces in order to solve the riemann - roch problem , and gave examples where @xmath8 is not finitely generated , see @xcite . in this article
we prove that the ring @xmath8 is finitely generated when @xmath0 is a complete toric variety ( perhaps singular ) .
the ring @xmath8 appears in many interesting problems , for example , if @xmath0 is a nonsingular projective variety , then the finite generation of @xmath8 implies that the series @xmath9 is rational .
it was asked by s. d. cutkosky and v. srinivas @xcite if this series is rational when @xmath2 is a nef divisor .
our result gives trivially a positive answer in the case of a complete toric variety , and @xmath2 any effective cartier divisor .
furthermore , the rationality of the series also allows us to compute , at least theoretically , the dimension of @xmath10 in terms of @xmath11 .
this is the riemann - roch problem , see for example @xcite and @xcite .
observe that these dimensions are not given by the riemann - roch theorem since the variety @xmath0 can be singular , and the line bundle @xmath4 is not necessarily generated by its global sections .
we would like to make a final remark .
the ring @xmath8 is a subring of the ring @xmath12 , which is finitely generated in the case of toric varieties .
in fact , d. cox proves in @xcite that the ring @xmath13 is a polynomial ring graded by the the monoid of effective divisors classes in the chow group @xmath14 of @xmath0 , where @xmath15 is the dimension of @xmath0 .
in this section we prove that the ring @xmath8 , which was defined by equation ( [ ring ] ) , is a finitely generated @xmath1-algebra . throughout this section @xmath0
means a complete toric variety over a field @xmath16 and @xmath2 a cartier divisor in @xmath3 the construction of the cone @xmath17 , in the proof of the theorem , is a well know construction , see for example @xcite .
we start by recalling an important lemma that will be use in the proof of the theorem .
we first observe that we can consider our divisor @xmath2 to be @xmath22-invariant . for the following sequence
is exact , see @xcite @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the group of @xmath22-invariant cartier divisors and @xmath25 is the dual lattice of @xmath26
. then we can write @xmath2 as @xmath27 with @xmath28 the set of invariant divisors .
we consider the convex rational polyhedron @xmath29 in @xmath30 defined as @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the the first element in the lattice appearing in the divisor @xmath33 .
we know that generators for the space @xmath34 are given by the elements of @xmath35 , which is a finite set because @xmath0 is a complete variety , this also implies that @xmath36 is a rational convex polytope .
let us embed the k - dimensional @xmath37-vector space @xmath38 into the ( k+1)-dimensional @xmath37-vector space @xmath39 as the hyperplane with equation @xmath40 , where @xmath41 are coordinates for @xmath42 .
denote by @xmath17 the ( @xmath43)-dimensional cone in @xmath42 generated by the rays starting at the origin and passing through the vertices of @xmath36 ( see figure below ) .
it follows from the definition that @xmath44 , and this implies that the intersection of the hyperplane @xmath45 with the cone @xmath17 is just the polyhedron @xmath29 .
in other words , the cone @xmath17 is the cone associated to the ring @xmath8 , in the sense that any element of the ring @xmath8 is a finite linear combination of integral points of @xmath46 the theorem follows since the semigroup @xmath47 is finitely generated by lemma [ gordan ] ( gordan ) .
i thank very much v. srinivas for suggesting me this problem and for many wonderful and fruitful conversations .
i also would like to thank a. king for bringing to my attention the article of d. cox , and to the referee for pointing out the article of v. batyrev .
|
start stating result consequences @xmath0 algebraic variety complete over field @xmath1 @xmath2 effective cartier divisor on @xmath3 denote @xmath4 line bundle @xmath5 @xmath6 interesting problem ring @xmath7 finitely generated @xmath1-algebra o. zariski worked algebraic surfaces riemann - roch problem examples @xmath8 not finitely generated article prove ring @xmath8 finitely generated when @xmath0 complete toric variety ring @xmath8 appears problems @xmath0 nonsingular projective variety finite generation @xmath8 implies series @xmath9 rational asked s d. cutkosky v. srinivas series rational when @xmath2 nef divisor result gives positive answer complete toric variety @xmath2 effective cartier divisor rationality series allows compute dimension @xmath10 terms @xmath11 riemann - roch problem dimensions not given by riemann - roch theorem variety @xmath0 can be singular line bundle @xmath4 not generated by global sections ring @xmath8 subring of ring @xmath12 finitely generated toric varietiescox proves ring @xmath13 polynomial ring graded effective divisors classes group @xmath14 @xmath0 @xmath15 dimension @xmath0 prove ring @xmath8 defined equation finitely generated @xmath1-algebra @xmath0 complete toric variety field @xmath16 @xmath2 cartier divisor @xmath3 construction cone @xmath17 well know construction lemma proof theorem divisor @xmath2 @xmath22-invariant sequence @xmath24 group @xmath22-invariant cartier divisors @xmath25 dual lattice @xmath26 write @xmath2 as @xmath27 @xmath28 set invariant divisors convex rational polyhedron @xmath29 @xmath30 defined @xmath31 @xmath32 first element lattice divisor @xmath33 generators space @xmath34 given elements @xmath35 finite set @xmath0 complete variety implies @xmath36 rational convex polytope embed k - dimensional @xmath37-vector space @xmath38 into k+1)-dimensional @xmath37-vector space @xmath39 hyperplane with equation @xmath40 @xmath41 coordinates for @xmath42denote @xmath17 @xmath43)-dimensional cone in @xmath42 generated by rays starting origin passing vertices @xmath36 figure follows definition @xmath44 implies intersection hyperplane @xmath45 with cone @xmath17 polyhedron @xmath29 cone @xmath17 cone associated to ring @xmath8 element ring @xmath8 finite linear combination integral points @xmath46 theorem follows semigroup @xmath47 generated by lemma [ gordan ] thank v. srinivas suggesting problem conversations thank a. king article d. cox referee article v. batyrev
| 0.182468
| 1,118
| 622
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,086
|
this article reports the optimized experimental requirements to determine neutrino mass hierarchy using electron antineutrinos ( @xmath0 ) generated in a nuclear reactor .
the features of the neutrino mass hierarchy can be extracted from the @xmath1 and @xmath2 oscillations by applying the fourier sine and cosine transform to the @xmath3 spectrum . to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy above 90% probability ,
the requirements on the energy resolution as a function of the baseline are studied at @xmath4 .
if the energy resolution of the neutrino detector is less than @xmath5 and the determination probability obtained from bayes theorem is above 90% , the detector needs to be located around 4853 km from the reactor(s ) to measure the energy spectrum of @xmath0 .
these results will be helpful for setting up an experiment to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy , which is an important problem in neutrino physics .
pacs numbers : : 13.15.+g , 14.60.pq , 14.60.lm , 29.85.+c keywords : : neutrino mass hierarchy , reactor experiment , fourier transform
|
since the measurement of the large @xmath6 at reno , daya bay , and double chooz , the precise measurement of neutrino mass hierarchy , the sign of @xmath7 , has become the focus in neutrino physics@xcite .
it had been believed that the neutrino mass hierarchy can be determined through long - baseline experiments , mainly using accelerator neutrino beams .
recently , the capability of a reactor neutrino experiment at an intermediate baseline to distinguish normal or inverted hierarchy was reported . for an intermediate - baseline neutrino experiment ,
many approaches have been proposed ; they can be categorized into the @xmath8 analysis methods , which are discussed in refs.@xcite , and the fourier - transform methods@xcite .
the @xmath8 analysis methods based on the newly adopted bayesian approach utilizes all the available information from experiments , and it is straightforward to incorporate the uncertainties in order to evaluate the sensitivity , providing robust and complementary results in the fourier - transform methods@xcite .
although the @xmath8 analysis methods are attractive and interesting , the fourier - transform methods are more intuitive .
the prominent merit of the fourier - transform methods are that the mass hierarchy can be extracted without precise knowledge of the reactor antineutrino spectrum , the absolute value of the large @xmath1 , and the energy scale of a detector .
the fourier - transform methods were introduced to enhance and visualize the structures of mass hierarchy in the frequency spectrum , as first discussed in ref .
@xcite . in principle
, the mass hierarchy can be determined through precise measurements of @xmath1 and @xmath2 .
as @xmath9 is very small and is only @xmath10 of @xmath1 , we have to measure @xmath1 and @xmath2 with a precision much better than @xmath11 .
however , @xmath1 and @xmath2 have been measured in many experiments with only @xmath12 precision@xcite .
the intermediate baseline based on reactor neutrino experiments has been explored using the precise measurement of distortions of the energy spectrum with negligible matter effect . learned _
proposed a new method to distinguish normal and inverse hierarchy after a fourier transform of the @xmath3 spectrum of reactor neutrinos@xcite .
they pointed out that the fourier power spectrum has a small but not negligible shoulder next to the main peak , and its relative position could be used to extract the mass hierarchy while a non - zero @xmath13 is considered . in this paper , we analyze the sensitivity of medium - baseline reactor antineutrino experiments to the neutrino mass hierarchy for a baseline range of 3060 km and overall energy resolution , @xmath14 , in the range of 0 to @xmath15 with the fourier - transform method . the optimal baseline length is estimated based on the expected probability of determination .
in a nuclear reactor , antineutrinos are mainly produced via the @xmath16-decay of the fission products of the four types of radioactive isotopes , @xmath17 , and @xmath18 , in the fuel .
the antineutrino flux having energy @xmath19 in mev with thermal power @xmath20 in @xmath21 is given as @xmath22 where @xmath23 and @xmath24 are the relative fission contribution and the energy released per fission of isotope @xmath25 , respectively .
further , @xmath26 is the number of antineutrinos produced per fission and is obtained as follows@xcite : @xmath27 the antineutrino flux is modulated by neutrino oscillation .
the antineutrino survival probability @xmath28 is expressed as @xmath29 the oscillation phase @xmath30 is defined as @xmath31 with a baseline @xmath32 . as @xmath33 and @xmath34
appear simultaneously in eq .
( 3 ) , the effects of mass hierarchy on @xmath28 are hardly recognized . by using the relation between the squared mass differences , @xmath35 we rearrange eq .
( 3 ) to eliminate the @xmath34 term as follows : @xmath36 the plus ( minus ) sign in the fifth term on the right - hand side of eq . ( 6 ) corresponds to the normal ( inverted ) mass hierarchy or nh ( ih ) in short . in ongoing reactor experiments
, we assume that protons will be used as targets to detect electron antineutrinos via the inverse - beta - decay ( ibd ) , which produces a neutron and positron .
the antineutrino distribution observed with a detector having @xmath37 free protons can be expressed for an exposure time @xmath38 as follows : @xmath39 where @xmath40 is the cross section of the ibd process and @xmath32 is the baseline length .
we use the distribution of the expected antineutrino events from the above expression . for the ibd cross section ,
we use the following expression from vogel and beacom s work@xcite : @xmath41 in order to study the sensitivity of the mass hierarchy , we use fourier - transform method together with monte carlo simulations to compare the simulated ibd energy spectrum with the expected spectrum in both the nh and ih cases . taking into account the detector response , the reactor electron antineutrino @xmath0 @xmath3 spectrum becomes @xmath42 where @xmath43 is the actual @xmath0 energy , @xmath44 is the observed @xmath0 energy with the detector response , @xmath45 is the energy resolution , and @xmath46 describes the detector response function including effects such as the energy resolution and energy scale . in this study , we take the normalized gaussian function as the response function : @xmath47 as the neutrino energy is usually measured using scintillators , the energy is typically proportional to the number of photoelectrons , and the error is dominated by the photoelectron statistics .
therefore , the neutrino energy resolution is proportional to @xmath48 . in general
, the detector energy resolution is parameterized into two parts : @xmath49 the first term represents the uncertainty from statistical fluctuation , and the second term originates from the systematic uncertainty . in this study , @xmath50 is assumed for simplicity .
before the measurement of the surprisingly large @xmath51 , it had been known that at the oscillation maximum of @xmath52 , which corresponds to a baseline of approximately 58 km , the sensitivity to the mass hierarchy is maximized at @xmath53 .
as @xmath51 is no longer small , the sensitivity to mass hierarchy needs to be explored as a function of the baseline , @xmath32 , and the detector energy resolution , @xmath54 . in this study , each monte carlo experiment generates a set of 500,000 @xmath0 events by sampling @xmath55 with input parameters , @xmath32 and @xmath54 .
the default oscillation parameters are taken from ref .
@xcite and listed in table [ parameter ] , together with the explored ranges of baseline and energy resolution .
.[parameter]default values of neutrino oscillation parameters and the explored ranges of other input parameters .
[ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
we have studied the experimental requirements to determine neutrino mass hierarchy using fourier sine and cosine transform of the reactor neutrino @xmath3 spectrum at @xmath4 .
the parameters @xmath56 and @xmath57 were defined to extract features of the fourier sine and cosine spectra , and the mass hierarchy could be obtained from the determination probability , @xmath58 based on bayes theorem .
since the effect of varying @xmath1 over its uncertainty has little effect on the fst and fct spectra at @xmath4 , the @xmath58 is less dependent on the uncertainty of @xmath1 than the value of @xmath6 . as defined in eq .
( 16 ) and eq .
( 17 ) , the probability @xmath58 is closely related to the different features of each mass hierarchy .
each value of @xmath58 indicates the probability that an experiment will be found inside its correct @xmath59 or @xmath60 region on the @xmath56 and @xmath61 planes .
these different features from different neutrino mass hierarchies suggest that the analysis method described in this paper , which is a simple and straightforward approach , can be used to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy by using the determination probability @xmath58 based on the fourier sine and cosine transform of the @xmath3 spectrum .
this work was supported by the national research foundation of korea ( nrf-2013r1a1a2011108 ) and also supported , in part , by the nrf grant no .
2009 - 0083526 .
00 j. k. ahn _
et al . , _ ( reno collaboration ) phys .
lett . * 108 * , 191802 ( 2012 ) .
f. p. an _ et al . , _
( daya bay collaboration ) phys .
lett . * 108 * , 171803 ( 2012 ) .
m. apollonio _
et al . _ ,
phys . rev . * d61 * , 012001 ( 2000 ) .
ghoshal and s. t. petcov , jhep 1103 ( 2011 ) 058 [ arxiv:1011.1646 ] .
x. qian , d. a. dwyer , r. d. mckeown , p. vogel , w. wang and c. zhang , arxiv:1208.1551 ( 2012 ) .
p. ghoshal and s. t. petcov , arxiv:1208.6473 ( 2012 ) .
li , j. cao , y. wang and l. zhan , arxiv:1303.6733 ( 2013 ) .
yoshitaro takaesu , arxiv:1304.5306 ( 2013 ) .
e. ciuffoli , j. evslin and x. zhang , arxiv:1208.1991 ( 2012 ) .
e. ciuffoli , j. evslin and x. zhang , arxiv:1209.2227 ( 2012 ) .
x. qian , a. tan , w. wang , j. j. ling , r. d. mckeown and c. zhang , arxiv:1210.3651 ( 2012 )
. j. learned , s. t. dye , s. pakvasa and r. c. svoboda , phys .
rev . * d78 * , 071302 ( 2008 ) .
j. beringer _
et al . , _ phys . rev . * d86 * , 010001 ( 2012 ) .
p. vogel and e. engel , phys .
* d39 * , 3378 ( 1989 ) .
p. vogel and j. f. beacom , phys .
* d60 * , 053003 ( 1999 ) .
p. huber and t. schwetz , phys . rev . *
d40 * , 053011 ( 2004 ) .
|
measurement large @xmath6 at reno daya bay double chooz precise measurement neutrino mass hierarchy sign @xmath7 focus in neutrino physics believed neutrino mass hierarchy determined long - baseline experiments accelerator neutrino beams reactor neutrino experiment intermediate baseline distinguish normal or inverted hierarchy reported intermediate - baseline neutrino experiment approaches proposed categorized @xmath8 analysis methods fourier - transform methods @xmath8 analysis methods bayesian approach utilizes information experiments straightforward incorporate uncertainties evaluate sensitivity robust complementary results @xmath8 analysis methods fourier - transform methods more intuitive transform mass hierarchy extracted without precise knowledge reactor antineutrino spectrum absolute value large @xmath1 energy scale detector fourier - transform methods introduced enhance visualize structures mass hierarchy in frequency spectrum mass hierarchy determined through precise measurements @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath9 small only @xmath10 of @xmath1 measure @xmath1 @xmath2 precision better than @xmath11 @xmath1 @xmath2 measured with only @xmath12 precisionintermediate baseline reactor neutrino experiments explored distortions energy spectrum negligible matter effect proposed method distinguish normal inverse hierarchy after fourier transform @xmath3 spectrum reactor neutrinos fourier power spectrum small shoulder main peak extract mass hierarchy non - zero @xmath13 sensitivity medium - baseline reactor antineutrino experiments neutrino mass hierarchy baseline range 3060 km energy resolution @xmath14 0 to @xmath15 fourier - transform method optimal baseline length estimated expected probability determination nuclear reactor antineutrinos produced @xmath16-decay fission products radioactive isotopes fuel antineutrino flux energy @xmath19 thermal power @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 relative fission contribution energy released per fission isotope @xmath25 @xmath26 number antineutrinos produced per fission obtained antineutrino flux modulated by neutrino oscillation antineutrino survival probability @xmath28 @xmath29 oscillation phase @xmath30 @xmath31 baseline @xmath32 @xmath33 @xmath34 effects mass hierarchy on @xmath28 recognizedrelation squared mass differences rearrange eq 3 ) eliminate @xmath34 term @xmath36 plus minus ) sign fifth term right side eq 6 ) corresponds normal inverted mass hierarchy reactor experiments protons targets detect electron antineutrinos inverse - beta - decay produces neutron positron antineutrino distribution detector @xmath37 free protons expressed exposure time @xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 cross section ibd process @xmath32 baseline length use distribution expected antineutrino events expression ibd cross section expression vogel beacom s work @xmath41 study mass hierarchy use fourier - transform method monte carlo simulations compare simulated ibd energy spectrum expected spectrum nh ih cases detector response reactor electron antineutrino @xmath0 @xmath3 spectrum becomes @xmath42 @xmath43 actual @xmath0 energy observed energy detector response energy resolution @xmath46 detector response function normalized gaussian function response function @xmath47 neutrino energy measured scintillators proportional to number photoelectrons error dominated photoelectron statistics neutrino energy resolution proportional to @xmath48detector energy resolution parameterized two parts @xmath49 statistical fluctuation second systematic uncertainty @xmath50 assumed for simplicity before measurement large @xmath51 oscillation maximum @xmath52 baseline 58 km sensitivity to mass hierarchy maximized at @xmath53 @xmath51 small sensitivity hierarchy function baseline @xmath32 detector energy resolution @xmath54 each monte carlo experiment generates 500,000 @xmath0 events sampling @xmath55 with input parameters @xmath32 @xmath54 default oscillation parameters from @xcite listed in table explored ranges baseline energy resolution values neutrino oscillation parameters ranges input parameters studied experimental requirements determine neutrino mass hierarchy using fourier sine cosine transform reactor neutrino @xmath3 spectrum at @xmath4 parameters @xmath56 @xmath57 defined extract features fourier sine cosine spectra mass hierarchy obtained from determination probability @xmath58 bayes theorem varying @xmath1 fst fct spectra @xmath4 @xmath58 less dependent on uncertainty @xmath1 than @xmath6 defined in eqprobability @xmath58 related to features mass hierarchy value indicates probability experiment inside correct @xmath59 or @xmath60 region on @xmath56 @xmath61 planes features neutrino mass hierarchies suggest analysis method determine neutrino mass hierarchy probability @xmath58 based fourier sine cosine transform @xmath3 spectrum work supported by national research foundation nrf-2013r1a1a2011108 nrf grant 2009 - 0083526 k ahn al reno collaboration phys . 191802 ( 2012 ) an daya bay collaboration phys 171803 2012 apollonio phys . rev 012001 ( 2000 ) ghoshal s t. petcov 1103 ( 2011 ) 058 arxiv:1011.1646 x qian dwyer mckeown vogel wang zhang arxiv:1208.1551 ( 2012 ) ghoshal t petcov arxiv:1208.6473 ( 2012 ) li cao wang l zhan arxiv:1303.6733 ( 2013 ) yoshitaro takaesu arxiv:1304.5306 ( 2013. ciuffoli j evslin x. zhang arxiv:1208.1991 ( 2012 )zhang arxiv:1209.2227 2012 ) qian tan wang ling mckeown zhang arxiv:1210.3651 2012 ) j. learned t dye pakvasa. svoboda . rev d78 071302 ( 2008 ) beringer rev d86 010001 ( 2012 ) vogel e engel d39 3378 ( 1989 ) vogel f. beacom phys d60 053003 ( 1999 ) huber t. schwetz rev d40 053011 ( 2004 )
| 0.353863
| 2,448
| 1,286
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,099
|
the paper presents a new fractional integration , which generalizes the riemann - liouville and hadamard fractional integrals into a single form , which when a parameter fixed at different values , produces the above integrals as special cases .
conditions are given for such a generalized fractional integration operator to be bounded in an extended lebesgue measurable space .
semigroup property for the above operator is also proved .
finally , we give a general definition of the fractional derivatives and give some examples .
submitted to : applied mathematics and computation
|
history of fractional calculus ( fc ) goes back to seventeenth century , when in 1695 the derivative of order @xmath0 was described by leibnitz . since then , the new theory turned out to be very attractive to mathematicians as well as biologists , chemists , economists , engineers and physicsts .
several books were written on the theories and developments of fc @xcite . in @xcite samko , et al , provides a comprehensive study of the subject .
several different derivatives were introduced : riemann - liouville , hadamard , grunwald - letnikov , riesz and caputo are just a few @xcite . in fractional calculus ,
the fractional derivatives are defined by a fractional integral @xcite .
there are several known forms of the fractional integrals of which two have been studied extensively for their applications @xcite .
the first is the _ riemann - liouville fractional integral _ defined for parameter @xmath1 by , @xmath2 motivated by the _ cauchy integral formula _ @xmath3 well - defined for @xmath4 .
the second is the _ hadamard fractional integral
_ introduced by j. hadamard @xcite , and given by , @xmath5 this is based on the generalization of the integral @xmath6 here we want to present the fractional integration , which generalizes both the riemann - liouville and hadamard fractional integrals into a single form .
new generalization is based on the observation that , for @xmath7 , @xmath8 which suggests the following fractional version @xmath9 where @xmath10 are real numbers .
these integrals are called _ left - sided _ integrals .
similarly we can define _ right - sided _
integrals @xcite . in the subsequent sections , we give conditions for the integration operator @xmath11 to be bounded in @xmath12
. we also establish semigroup property for the generalized fractional integration operator and finally , we give the general definition of the fractional derivatives .
consider the space @xmath13 of those complex - valued lebesgue measurable functions @xmath14 on @xmath15 $ ] for which @xmath16 , where the norm is defined by @xmath17 and for the case @xmath18
@xmath19 \quad ( c \in \textbf{r}).\ ] ] in particular , when @xmath20 the space @xmath21 coincides with the classical @xmath22-space with @xmath23 to derive a formula for the generalized integral , consider for natural @xmath24 and real @xmath25 and @xmath26 , the n - fold integral of the form @xmath27 first notice that - using the dirichlet technique ( see p. 64 of @xcite ) , we have @xmath28 repeating the above step @xmath29 times we arrived at @xmath30 fractional version of ( [ eq : nint ] ) is the following @xmath31 where @xmath32 and @xmath33 are real numbers . when @xmath34 we arrive at the standard riemann - liouville fractional integral , which is used to define both the riemann - liouville and caputo fractional derivatives @xcite .
using lhospital rule , when @xmath35 , we have @xmath36 this is the famous hadamard fractional integral ( [ eq : h ] ) @xcite . hadamard fractional integral has been extensively studied , especially , hadamard - type fractional calculus @xcite , composition and semigroup properties @xcite , mellin transforms @xcite , integration by parts formulae @xcite , and _
g - transform _
representations @xcite are just a few .
in this section we show that the generalized fractional integration operator @xmath37 is well - defined on @xmath12 for @xmath38 .
we have the following theorem [ eq : th1 ] let @xmath39 and let @xmath40 and @xmath41 be such that @xmath42 . then the operator @xmath43 is bounded in @xmath12 and @xmath44 [ eq : thm1 ] where @xmath45 [ eq : con1 ] first consider the case @xmath46 . since @xmath47 , then @xmath48 and we can apply the generalized minkowsky inequality .
we have @xmath49 and hence @xmath50 where @xmath51 thus , theorem [ eq : th1 ] is proved for @xmath52 . for @xmath18 , by ( [ eq : df2 ] ) and ( [ eq : fint ] ) we have @xmath53 after the substitution @xmath54 .
this agrees with ( [ eq : con2 ] ) above .
this completes the proof of the theorem .
note that this proof is similar to the proof of the theorem 2.1 in @xcite .
the following version of the theorem [ eq : th1 ] has been proved in @xcite , for the special case when @xmath35 .
let @xmath55 and let @xmath40 and @xmath56 be such that @xmath42 .
then the operator @xmath57 is bounded in @xmath12 and @xmath58 where @xmath59 for @xmath60 , while @xmath61\ ] ] for @xmath62 , where @xmath63 is the incomplete gamma - function defined by @xmath64 substituting @xmath65 in theorem [ eq : th1 ] and taking ( [ eq : df3 ] ) into account , we deduce the boundedness of the operator @xmath66 in the space @xmath67 .
let @xmath68 and let @xmath40 be such that @xmath69 .
then the operator @xmath57 is bounded in @xmath22 and @xmath70 where @xmath71 [ eq : con3 ] notice that this is corollary 2.2 of @xcite .
we now turn to algebraic properties of the integral operator .
in this section we give semigroup properties of the integral operator [ eq : th2 ] let @xmath72 and let @xmath73 and @xmath74 be such that @xmath42 . then for @xmath75 the semigroup property holds .
that is , @xmath76 [ eq : semi ] using fubinis theorem , for `` sufficiently good '' function @xmath14 , we have @xmath77 the inner integral is evaluated by the change of variable @xmath78 @xmath79 according to the known formulae for the beta function @xcite . substituting ( [ eq : pf2 ] ) into ( [ eq : pf1 ] ) we obtain @xmath80 and thus , ( [ eq : semi ] ) is proved for sufficiently good functions @xmath14 . if @xmath42 then by theorem [ eq : th1 ] the operators @xmath81 and @xmath82 are bunded in @xmath12 , hence the realation ( [ eq : semi ] ) is true for @xmath83 this completes the proof of the theorem [ eq : th2 ] .
we have the following corollary .
let @xmath72 and let @xmath73 be such that @xmath69 .
then for @xmath84 the semigroup property ( [ eq : semi ] ) holds .
we can extend ( [ eq : fint ] ) to an arbitrary complex order @xmath85 and can also define _ right - sided _ generalized fractional integrals .
let @xmath86 \ , ( -\infty < a < b < \infty)$ ] be a finite interval on the real axis @xmath87 .
the generalized fractional integral @xmath88 of order @xmath89 is defined by @xmath90 for @xmath91 and @xmath92 .
this integral is called the _ left - sided _ fractional integral .
similarly we can define the _ right - sided _ fractional integral @xmath93 by @xmath94 for @xmath95 and @xmath92 .
in the next section we will define _ generalized fractional derivatives _ for an arbitrary complex order @xmath89 for riemann - liouville type ( r - g ) and similarly , we can define generalized fractional derivatives for caputo - type ( l - g ) .
the integrals ( [ eq : df1 ] ) and ( [ eq : df2 ] ) allow one to define the corresponding generalized fractional derivatives . here
we only define riemann - liouville type derivatives . for @xmath35
, we will also get the corresponding hadamard - type derivatives as a natural generalization to the standard hadamard fractional derivatives .
the caputo - type derivatives can be defined similarly . when @xmath106 , formulars ( [ eq : df3 ] ) and ( [ eq : df4 ] ) take the following forms , @xmath107 for @xmath91 and @xmath108 for @xmath95 , where @xmath109 , while formulars ( [ eq : df5 ] ) and ( [ eq : df6 ] ) are given by @xmath110 for @xmath91 and @xmath111 for @xmath105 .
let @xmath98 and @xmath116 . the generalised caputo - type derivative of arbitrary order @xmath32 of @xmath117 is defined by @xmath118 for @xmath91 , and @xmath119 for @xmath95 , if the right - hand - sides exist . to demonstrate the use of the new derivative
, we will obtain generalized fractional derivative of the power function for a special case .
for simplicity assume @xmath122 and @xmath123 , and use the following version of the derivative @xmath124 we find the generalized derivative of the function @xmath125 , where @xmath126 .
the formula ( [ eq : simple0 ] ) yields @xmath127 to evaluate the inner integral , we use the substitution @xmath128 to obtain , @xmath129 where @xmath130 is the beta function . combining ( [ eq : simple2 ] ) with ( [ eq : simple1 ] ) , we obtain , @xmath131 for @xmath132 , after using the properties of the beta function @xcite and the relation @xmath133 . when @xmath34 we obtain the riemann - liouville fractional derivative of the power function given by @xcite , @xmath134 to compare results , we plot ( [ eq : gen ] ) for several values of @xmath25 .
we also consider different values of @xmath135 to see the effect on the degree of the power function .
the results are summaries in figure 1 and figure 2 : find an exact formula for the left - sided generalized fractional derivative of the power function , @xmath136 with @xmath137 , that is , evaluate the following integral , @xmath138 for @xmath91 where @xmath85 , @xmath101 and @xmath139 .
according to the figure 1 and figure 2 , we notice that the characteristics of the fractional derivative is highle affected by the value of @xmath25 , thus it provides a new direction for the control applications .
the paper presents a new fractional integration , which generalizes the riemann - liouville and hadamard fractional integrals into a single form , which when a parameter fixed at different values , produces the above integrals as special cases .
conditions are given for such a generalized fractional integration operator to be bounded in an extended lebesgue measurable space .
semigroup property for the above operator is also proved .
we also gave a general definition of the fractional derivatives and gave some examples . in a future paper
, we will derive formulae for the laplace , fourier and mellin transforms for the generalized fractional integral .
we already know that we can deduce hadamard and riemann - liouville integrals for the special cases of @xmath25 .
we want to further investigate the effect on the new parameter @xmath25 .
we will also study the generalize fractional derivatives and their properties .
those results will appear elsewhere .
butzer , p. l. , kilbas , a. a. , and trujillo , j.j .
, _ compositions of hadamard - type fractional integration operators and the semigroup property _ , journal of mathematical analysis and applications , * 269 * , ( 2002 ) , 387 - 400 .
butzer , p. l. , kilbas , a. a. , and trujillo , j.j . , _ fractional calculus in the mellin setting and hadamard - type fractional integrals _ , journal of mathematical analysis and applications , * 269 * , ( 2002 ) , 1 - 27 .
butzer , p. l. , kilbas , a. a. , and trujillo , j.j . , _ melling transform analysis and integration by parts for hadamard - type fractional integrals _ , journal of mathematical analysis and applications , * 270 * , ( 2002 ) , 1 - 15 .
|
history fractional calculus seventeenth century 1695 derivative @xmath0 described by leibnitz new theory to mathematicians biologists chemists economists engineers physicsts books written on theories developments fc @xcite samko comprehensive study derivatives introduced riemann - liouville hadamard grunwald - letnikov riesz caputo calculus fractional derivatives defined by fractional integral @xcite several known forms fractional integrals two studied for applications first riemann - liouville fractional integral defined @xmath1 @xmath2 second hadamard fractional integral introduced by j. hadamard @xmath5 based on generalization integral @xmath6 fractional integration generalizes riemann - liouville hadamard fractional integrals into single form new generalization based on observation @xmath7 @xmath8 fractional version @xmath9 @xmath10 real numbers integrals called left - sided _ integrals define right - sided integrals @xcite subsequent sections conditions for integration operator @xmath11 to bounded in @xmath12establish semigroup property generalized fractional integration operator general definition fractional derivatives consider space @xmath13 complex - valued lebesgue measurable functions @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 norm defined @xmath17 case @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 space @xmath21 coincides classical @xmath22 @xmath23 formula generalized integral consider natural @xmath24 real @xmath25 @xmath26 n - fold integral form @xmath27 dirichlet technique p. 64 @xcite @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 fractional version @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 real numbers @xmath34 standard riemann - liouville fractional integral define riemann - liouville caputo fractional derivatives @xcite lhospital rule @xmath35 @xmath36 famous hadamard fractional integral h @xcite extensively studied - type fractional calculus @xcite composition semigroup properties mellin transforms integration parts formulae g - transform representations generalized fractional integration operator @xmath37 - defined @xmath12 @xmath38theorem [ eq : th1 ] @xmath39 @xmath42 operator @xmath43 bounded @xmath12 eq : thm1 @xmath45 eq : con1 consider @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 generalized minkowsky inequality @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 theorem [ eq : th1 ] proved @xmath52 @xmath18 eq : df2 ] eq : fint ] @xmath53 substitution @xmath54 agrees eq : con2 ] completes proof theorem similar theorem 2.1 @xcite theorem [ eq : th1 ] proved @xcite case @xmath35 @xmath55 @xmath42 operator @xmath57 bounded @xmath12 @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 incomplete gamma - function @xmath64 substituting @xmath65 eq : th1 ] eq : df3 ] deduce boundedness operator @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath40 @xmath69 operator @xmath57 bounded @xmath22 @xmath70 @xmath71 eq : con3 ] corollary 2.2 @xcite algebraic properties integral operatorsemigroup properties integral operator eq : th2 @xmath72 @xmath42 @xmath75 semigroup property holds @xmath76 eq : semi fubinis theorem sufficiently good function @xmath14 @xmath77 inner integral evaluated change variable @xmath78 beta function substituting eq : pf2 eq : pf1 @xmath80 eq : semi ] proved sufficiently good functions @xmath14 @xmath42 eq th1 operators @xmath81 @xmath82 bunded @xmath12 realation eq : semi ] true @xmath83 completes proof theorem eq : th2 corollary @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath69 @xmath84 semigroup property eq : semi holds extend eq : fint ] arbitrary complex order @xmath85 define right - sided generalized fractional integrals @xmath86 < < finite interval real axis @xmath87 generalized fractional integral @xmath88 @xmath89 defined @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 left - sided fractional integral define right - sided fractional integral @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath95 @xmath92next section define generalized fractional derivatives arbitrary complex order @xmath89 riemann - liouville type r - g caputo - type l - g ) integrals eq df1 eq df2 define fractional derivatives define riemann - liouville type derivatives @xmath35 hadamard - type derivatives standard hadamard fractional derivatives caputo - type derivatives defined @xmath106 formulars eq df3 df4 forms @xmath107 @xmath91 @xmath108 @xmath95 @xmath109 formulars eq df5 df6 @xmath110 @xmath91 @xmath111 @xmath105 @xmath98 @xmath116 generalised caputo - type derivative arbitrary order @xmath32 @xmath117 defined @xmath118 @xmath91 @xmath119 @xmath95 right - hand - sides exist derivative obtain generalized fractional derivative power function special case assume @xmath122 @xmath123 version derivative @xmath124 generalized derivative function @xmath125 @xmath126 formula eq simple0 yields @xmath127 evaluate inner integral substitution @xmath128 obtain @xmath129 @xmath130 beta functioneq : simple2 with simple1 obtain @xmath131 @xmath132 properties beta function @xcite relation @xmath133 @xmath34 obtain riemann - liouville fractional derivative power function @xmath134 plot eq : gen ] for values @xmath25 consider values @xmath135 effect power function results in figure 1 2 find formula for left - sided generalized derivative power function @xmath136 with @xmath137 evaluate integral @xmath138 for @xmath91 @xmath85 @xmath101 @xmath139 characteristics fractional derivative affected by value @xmath25 new direction for control applications paper presents new fractional integration generalizes riemann - liouville hadamard fractional integrals single form different values produces integrals as special cases conditions for generalized fractional integration operator bounded in extended lebesgue measurable space semigroup property proved general definition fractional derivatives examples future paper derive formulae for laplace fourier mellin transforms generalized fractional integral deduce hadamard riemann - liouville integrals for special cases @xmath25 investigate effect new parameter @xmath25 study generalize fractional derivatives properties results butzer kilbas a a trujillo j.j hadamard - type fractional integration operators semigroup property journal mathematical analysis applications 269 2002 ) 387 - 400 butzer kilbas trujillo fractional calculus mellin setting hadamard - type fractional integrals journal 269 2002 1 - 27 butzer kilbas trujillo melling transform analysis integration parts hadamard - type fractional integrals journal mathematical analysis 270 * 2002 ) 1 - 15 .
| 0.431117
| 2,827
| 1,527
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,104
|
the scope of this paper is twofold .
first , to emphasize the use of the mod 1 map in exploring the digit distribution of random variables . we show that the well - known base- and scale - invariance of benford variables are consequences of their associated mod 1 density functions being uniformly distributed .
second , to introduce a new concept of the @xmath0-digit benford variable .
such a variable is benford in the first @xmath0 digits , but it is not guaranteed to have a logarithmic distribution beyond the @xmath0-th digit .
we conclude the paper by giving a general construction method for @xmath0-digit benford variables , and provide a concrete example .
|
in 1881 , newcomb @xcite noticed that the first digit distribution of numerical data is not uniform but rather logarithmic .
he had observed that the pages of logarithm tables were more worn out for smaller digits such as @xmath1 and @xmath2 than for larger ones , and concluded that `` [ the ] law of probability of the occurrence of the numbers is such that all mantissae of their logarithms are equally probable . ''
he explicitly tabulated the probability of occurrence of the first and second digits .
apparently unaware of newcomb s results , in 1938 , benford @xcite found the same first digit phenomenon , and explicitly gave the formula for the probability of a number having the first digit @xmath3 , @xmath4 where @xmath5 is used to represent the base @xmath6 logarithm .
he gathered empirical evidence for formula ( [ eq : ben ] ) by collecting thousands of numbers from diverse datasets , such as the area of the riverbeds , atomic weights of elements , etc .
it has been shown ( see for example @xcite ) that the only non - trivial digit distribution that is left invariant under scale change of the underlying distribution is the benford distribution .
scale - invariance means that a collection of data has the same digit distribution when multiplied by a constant . in his seminal paper @xcite
, hill showed that the appropriate domain for the significant digit probability is the smallest collection of positive real subsets that contains all the infinite sets of the form @xmath7 .
this set denoted by @xmath8 , is the smallest sigma algebra generated by @xmath9 , @xmath10 , , where @xmath11 is the @xmath12-th significant - digit function .
@xmath13 and @xmath14 for @xmath15 .
for example , @xmath16 and @xmath17 .
observe that @xmath18 for all @xmath12 and @xmath3 . within this framework , for a random variable @xmath19 ,
the benford s first digit distribution law can be stated as @xmath20 in general @xcite , a random variable is benford if for all @xmath21 , all @xmath22 and all @xmath23 for @xmath24 , @xmath25 for example , the probability of having digits @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 as the first , second and third significant digits , respectively , is @xmath29 hill defined base - invariance , and proved that base - invariance as well as scale - invariance imply benford distribution of digits .
leemis et .
al @xcite investigated several examples of symmetric and non - symmetric distributions that lead to benford distributed random variables .
this paper is organized as follows . in section [ mod1 ] ,
we use the mod 1 map to show that the well - known base- and scale - invariance of benford distributed random variables are consequences of @xmath30 , where @xmath31 is the associated density function . in section [ nben ]
, we introduce the concept of @xmath0-digit benford distributed random variables which are guaranteed to obey the log distribution in their first @xmath0 digits , and give a general construction method for such variables .
unless otherwise specified , throughout this paper , we assume that the base is @xmath6 .
any positive real number @xmath32 can be written as @xmath33 for some @xmath34 , where @xmath35
. then the first digits of @xmath32 and @xmath36 are the same : @xmath37 .
let us assume that @xmath32 is given by a random variable @xmath19 with the density function @xmath38 .
let @xmath39 be the random variable with the density function @xmath40 . for any real function @xmath41
, we define @xmath42 as @xmath43 [ l : one ] [ dagger ] the probability of @xmath44 having its first digit @xmath3 is @xmath45 let us consider the real numbers starting with the digit @xmath3 , i.e. , @xmath46 .
these numbers belong to the set @xmath47 now consider the random variable @xmath39 with the density function @xmath40 .
the logarithmic function maps @xmath48 into @xmath49 .
this set modulo @xmath1 is just @xmath50 as illustrated in figure ( [ f : mod1 ] ) for the case @xmath51 .
.,scaledwidth=90.0% ] consequently @xmath52 clearly , if @xmath30 , then one obtains benford s law @xmath53 .
the uniformity of @xmath31 resonates with newcomb s pioneering observation in 1881 @xcite that the `` probability of the occurrence of the numbers is such that all mantissae of their logarithms are equally probable . ''
lemma [ l : one ] can be readily generalized for the probability of a sequence of prescribed digits @xmath54 , where @xmath55 and @xmath56 for @xmath57 : @xmath58 scale - invariance means that a collection of data does not change its digit distribution when multiplied by a constant .
for example , suppose that the prices of goods are benford distributed , then scale - invariance implies that these prices remain benford distributed regardless of the currency in which they are converted .
[ l : scale - tr ] scaling of a random variable @xmath19 is equivalent to a translation of @xmath59 .
let @xmath60 be a random variable with the density function @xmath40 and let @xmath61 be the random variable generated by the translation of @xmath60 by @xmath62 units , i.e. , @xmath63 and @xmath64 , where @xmath65 is the density function of @xmath61 .
define @xmath66 and @xmath67 and let @xmath38 and @xmath68 be their corresponding density functions . in terms of cumulative distribution functions , we have @xmath69 the converse is immediate .
due to modular arithmetics , a translation of @xmath40 will result in a wrap - around effect in @xmath31 .
hence , scaling of @xmath19 induces a wrap - around of @xmath31 .
for example , let @xmath70 be the random variable with the density function @xmath71 , and let @xmath61 be its translation by @xmath62 .
the effect of scaling of @xmath19 on @xmath31 is shown in figure ( [ f : wrap ] ) .
of a translation by t=0.65 of the @xmath71.,scaledwidth=60.0% ] by lemma ( [ dagger ] ) , we observe that @xmath72 , i.e. , the first digit distributions of @xmath19 and @xmath73 are not the same , indicating that @xmath19 is not scale - invariant .
one can see that only a uniform @xmath31 remains unchanged under the wrap - around effect induced by a scaling of @xmath19 .
[ t : ben - scale ] only the random variables characterized by @xmath74 are scale - invariant .
by lemma ( [ l : scale - tr ] ) , scaling of @xmath19 yields a wrap - around effect of @xmath31 . for a benford distribution ,
we want the same areas under the @xmath31 and @xmath75 over the intervals @xmath76 @xmath77 . here
@xmath75 denotes the mod 1 projection of @xmath65 which is the shifted @xmath40 .
clearly , a uniform @xmath31 will satisfy this constraint . any other function when translated by an arbitrary amount , will not simultaneously keep the areas under @xmath31 preserved over all of these intervals .
thus , the only @xmath31 left unchanged under all translations is the uniform one .
we are now arriving at two important results first proved by hill @xcite concerning scale- and base - invariance .
scale - invariance implies benford s law . in order to have scale - invariance , we must have @xmath74 . from lemma ( [ dagger ] ) ,
one obtains benford s law .
base - invariance means that for any base @xmath78 , the probability of having @xmath3 as the first digit is @xmath79 scale - invariance implies base - invariance .
scale - invariance requires @xmath74 .
then , for an arbitrary base @xmath78 , integrating over the logarithmic intervals @xmath80 , we get benford s distribution @xmath81 using the insight gained by the mod 1 map analysis , we can construct an infinite class of benford distributed random variables with non - compact support .
to this end , let us consider @xmath60 with the following density function @xmath82,\ ] ] as illustrated in figure [ f : series ] . with non - compact support yielding uniform @xmath31.,scaledwidth=45.0% ] here
@xmath83 is the heaviside step function . since the series @xmath84 , one obtains @xmath30 and thus , @xmath66 is benford distributed .
a similar construction can be used for any convergent series .
we define a random variable that has a logarithmic distribution in its first @xmath0 digits to be a @xmath0-digit benford variable .
more precisely , such a variable is benford in the first @xmath0 digits , but it is not guaranteed to have a logarithmic distribution beyond the @xmath0-th digit .
let @xmath85 .
a random variable is @xmath0-digit benford if for all @xmath22 and all @xmath86 , @xmath87 , @xmath88 to show that such variables exist , we use ( [ e : five ] ) to construct a @xmath31 that satisfies ( [ e : benf ] ) for any @xmath85 .
that is , we search for @xmath31 such that @xmath89 we proceed by the partition @xmath90 of the @xmath91 interval . then an example of @xmath31 which yields a @xmath1-digit benford distribution is given by @xmath92 as illustrated in figure [ f : sine ] . yielding a @xmath1-digit benford random variable.,scaledwidth=45.0% ]
one can readily check that @xmath93 . by theorem ( [ t : ben - scale ] ) any density function @xmath40 whose @xmath31 is non - uniform is not scale - invariant .
thus the example of equation ( [ e : non - u ] ) while yielding a @xmath1-digit benford distributed variable , is not scale- nor base - invariant . following this idea , one can generalize the example given in ( [ e : non - u ] ) in order to produce a @xmath31 which satisfy ( [ e : star ] ) with an arbitrary large @xmath0 .
for such a construction , let @xmath94 be a partition of the interval @xmath91 .
let @xmath95 \to [ 0,\infty)$ ] be a probability density function .
for @xmath96 such that @xmath97 , let us define @xmath98 it is easy to see that for all @xmath99 , @xmath100 therefore , we have that @xmath31 behaves as the uniform density ( @xmath101 for all @xmath102 ) when integrated over intervals of the form @xmath103 with @xmath104 .
using mathematica @xcite , we modeled a 1-digit benford random variable by generating its discrete approximation with @xmath105 data points . as a concrete example we took @xmath66 where @xmath60 has the density function @xmath106 given by ( [ e : non - u ] ) . from @xmath107
, we obtain the density function for @xmath19 : @xmath108 the 100-bin histogram of these data points is shown in figure [ f : subfig1 ] along with the graph of the density function @xmath38 represented by dashed lines .
the mathematica generated data closely follow the actual curve of the density function , as we can see in [ f : subfig1 ] . in figure
[ f : subfig2 ] , we show the histogram of the first digit distribution of the experimental points versus the theoretical benford probabilities . the numerical results are recorded in table [ t : data ] . note the accuracy of the mathematica generated numbers .
.theoretical vs. experimental ( mathematica generated ) probabilities for the 1-digit benford random variable ( [ e : f - non - u ] ) [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
in this paper , we demonstrated the importance of mod 1 map in analyzing the digit distribution of random variables .
in particular , we have shown that a uniform @xmath31 implies scale- and base - invariance .
we have introduced the concept of @xmath0-digit benford , and gave a concrete example of a 1-digit benford random variable .
furthermore , we have shown how to use the mod 1 map to construct a @xmath0-digit benford variable starting with any density function .
we generated , with the help of the computer algebra system mathematica , a @xmath105 data points discrete approximation of a 1-digit benford variable , and found close agreement between the first digit probabilities of the model against the expected theoretical probabilities .
we are grateful to the anonymous referee for the valuable and constructive suggestions that helped improve this work .
we also would like to thank prof .
berger for very useful discussions .
|
1881 newcomb noticed first digit distribution numerical data not uniform logarithmic observed pages logarithm tables worn out for smaller digits @xmath1 than larger concluded law of probability all logarithms equally probable tabulated probability first second digits unaware 1938 benford @xcite found same first digit phenomenon gave formula for probability number first digit @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 base @xmath6 logarithm gathered evidence formula thousands numbers from diverse datasets shown only non - trivial digit distribution invariant under scale change is benford distribution scale - invariance means collection data same digit distribution when multiplied by constant paper hill showed appropriate domain for significant digit probability smallest collection of positive real subsets infinite sets form @xmath7 set @xmath8 smallest sigma algebra generated by @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 is @xmath12-th significant - digit function @xmath13 @xmath14 for @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 for @xmath12 @xmath3 random variable @xmath19 benford s first digit distribution law as @xmath20 random variable benford @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 probability digits @xmath26 @xmath28 first second third significant digits is @xmath29 hill defined base - invariance scale - invariance imply benford distribution digits leemis et al investigated non - symmetric distributions benford distributed random variables paper organized section [ mod1 mod map base- scale - invariance benford distributed random variables consequences of @xmath30 @xmath31 associated density function section [ nben concept @xmath0-digit benford distributed random variables obey log distribution first @xmath0 digits general construction method base is @xmath6 positive real number @xmath32 written as @xmath33 @xmath34 first digits of @xmath32 @xmath36 same @xmath37 @xmath32 given by random variable @xmath19 density function @xmath38 @xmath39 random variable density function @xmath40real function @xmath41 define @xmath42 as @xmath43 probability @xmath44 first digit @xmath3 is @xmath45 consider real numbers starting with digit @xmath3 @xmath46 numbers belong set @xmath47 random variable @xmath39 density function @xmath40 logarithmic function maps @xmath48 into @xmath49 set modulo @xmath1 @xmath50 figure case @xmath51=90.0% @xmath52 @xmath30 obtains benford s law @xmath53 uniformity @xmath31 resonates newcomb s observation 1881 probability occurrence numbers equally probable generalized probability sequence prescribed digits @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 scale - invariance collection data change digit distribution multiplied by constant prices goods benford distributed scale - invariance implies regardless currency scaling random variable @xmath19 equivalent to translation of @xmath59 @xmath60 random variable density function @xmath40 @xmath61 random variable generated translation @xmath60 @xmath62 units @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 density function of @xmath61define @xmath66 @xmath38 corresponding density functions cumulative distribution functions @xmath69 converse immediate translation of @xmath40 wrap - around effect @xmath31 scaling @xmath19 induces wrap - around @xmath31 @xmath70 random variable with density function @xmath71 @xmath61 translation by @xmath62 effect scaling @xmath19 on @xmath31 shown in figure translation by t=0.65 @xmath71=60.0% @xmath72 first digit distributions of @xmath19 @xmath73 not same @xmath19 not scale - invariant uniform @xmath31 remains unchanged under wrap - around effect scaling @xmath19 random variables @xmath74 scale - invariant scaling @xmath19 yields wrap - around effect of @xmath31 benford distribution same areas under @xmath31 @xmath75 over intervals @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath75 mod 1 projection of @xmath65 shifted @xmath40 uniform @xmath31 constraint other function translated arbitrary keep areas under @xmath31 preserved over intervals only @xmath31 left unchanged under all translations is uniformarriving at results by @xcite scale- base - invariance scale - invariance implies benford s law @xmath74 lemma obtains benford s law base - invariance base @xmath78 probability @xmath3 first digit is @xmath79 scale invariance requires @xmath74 arbitrary base @xmath78 integrating over logarithmic intervals @xmath80 benford s distribution @xmath81 mod 1 map analysis construct infinite class of benford distributed random variables with non - compact support consider @xmath60 with density function @xmath82 illustrated in figure f series non - compact support uniform @xmath31,scaledwidth=45.0% @xmath83 heaviside step function series @xmath84 obtains @xmath30 @xmath66 is benford distributed similar construction for convergent series define random variable logarithmic distribution in first @xmath0 digits @xmath0-digit benford variable benford first @xmath0 digits not guaranteed beyond @xmath0-th digit @xmath85 random variable is @xmath0-digit benford if @xmath22 @xmath86 use construct @xmath31 satisfies for @xmath85search for @xmath31 @xmath89 partition @xmath90 of @xmath91 interval example @xmath31 @xmath1-digit benford distribution by @xmath92 figure [ f : sine @xmath1-digit benford random variable,scaledwidth=45.0% check @xmath93 density function @xmath40 @xmath31 non - uniform not scale - invariant equation ( [ e : non - u ] @xmath1-digit benford distributed variable not scale- base - invariant generalize example non - u produce @xmath31 [ e : star ] with arbitrary large @xmath0 @xmath94 partition of interval @xmath91 @xmath95 probability density function @xmath96 define @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath31 uniform density for @xmath102 integrated over intervals @xmath103 with @xmath104 modeled 1-digit benford random variable discrete approximation with @xmath105 data points example @xmath66 @xmath60 has density function @xmath106 ( [ e : non - u ]@xmath107 obtain density function for @xmath19 : @xmath108 100-bin histogram shown in figure f : subfig1 graph density function @xmath38 dashed lines mathematica generated data follow curve density function subfig1 figure f : subfig2 histogram first digit distribution experimental points versus theoretical benford probabilities numerical results recorded in table [ t : data ] accuracy mathematica generated numbers vs. experimental probabilities 1-digit benford random variable f - - demonstrated importance of mod 1 map analyzing digit distribution random variables uniform @xmath31 implies scale- base - invariance introduced concept of @xmath0-digit benford concrete example 1-digit benford random variable shown mod 1 map construct @xmath0-digit benford variable density function generated computer algebra system mathematica @xmath105 data points discrete approximation of 1-digit benford variable found agreement between first digit probabilities model against theoretical probabilities grateful to anonymous referee for suggestions prof . berger for discussions
| 0.436138
| 2,985
| 1,599
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,108
|
several methods are currently available to simulate paths of the brownian motion . in particular , paths of the bm can be simulated using the properties of the increments of the process like in the euler scheme , or as the limit of a random walk or via @xmath0 decomposition like the kac - siegert / karnounen - loeve series . in this paper
we first propose a ifsm ( iterated function systems with maps ) operator whose fixed point is the trajectory of the bm .
we then use this representation of the process to simulate its trajectories .
the resulting simulated trajectories are self - affine , continuous and fractal by construction .
this fact produces more realistic trajectories than other schemes in the sense that their geometry is closer to the one of the true bm s trajectories .
the ifsm trajectory of the bm can then be used to generate more realistic solutions of stochastic differential equations . *
ams subject classification : * * keywords : * iterated function systems , brownian motion , simulation of stochastic differential equations
|
in this paper we show how to solve the inverse problem for ifsm in the case of trajectories of stochastic processes in @xmath0 .
the method is based on the solution of the inverse problem for ifsm due to forte and vrscay @xcite .
this is an extension of classical ifs methods which can be used for approximating a given element of @xmath1 thus in particular trajectories of stochastic processes on this space .
the final goal of this approach is simulation . indeed ,
several methods are currently available to simulate paths of stochastic processes and in particular of the brownian motion .
paths of the bm can be simulated using the properties of the increments of the process like in the euler scheme @xcite , or as the limit of a random walk or via @xmath0 decomposition like the kac - siegert / karnounen - loeve series @xcite . in this paper
we first propose a ifsm ( iterated function systems with maps ) operator whose fixed point is the trajectory of the bm .
we then use this representation of the process to simulate its trajectories .
the resulting simulated trajectories are self - affine , continuous and fractal by construction .
this fact produces more realistic trajectories than other schemes in the sense that their geometry is closer to the one of the true bm s trajectories .
the ifsm trajectory of the bm can then be used to generate more realistic solutions of stochastic differential equations .
the paper is organized as follows : section [ sec : ifsm ] recalls the theory of ifsm on @xmath0 , section [ sec : l2 ] recalls some details for stochastic processes with trajectories in @xmath0 and the link with the ifsm theory .
section [ sec : bm ] presents the application of the ifsm theory to the problem of simulation with particular attention to the case of the brownian motion .
the basic idea of iterated function systems ( ifs ) can be traced back to some historical papers but the use of such systems to construct fractals and other similar sets was first described by hutchinson ( 1981 ) .
the fundamental result on which the ifs method is based is banach theorem .
the mathematical context is the following : given @xmath2 in a complete metric space @xmath3 , find a contractive operator @xmath4 that admits a unique fixed point @xmath5 such that @xmath6 is small enough .
in fact if one is able to solve _ the inverse problem _ with arbitrary precision , it is possible to identify @xmath2 with the operator @xmath7 which has it as fixed point .
the fundamental theorems on which the ifs method is based on are the following : ( banach theorem ) let @xmath8 be a complete metric space ; suppose there exists a mapping @xmath4 such that @xmath9 for all @xmath10 and some @xmath11 .
@xmath12 is said to be the contractivity factor of @xmath7 .
then there exits a unique @xmath5 such that @xmath13 and for any @xmath14 we have @xmath15 when @xmath16 .
( collage theorem ) let @xmath8 be a complete metric space . given @xmath14 suppose that there exists a contractive map @xmath7 with contractivity factor @xmath11 such that @xmath17
. if @xmath18 is the fixed point of @xmath7 then @xmath19 .
let @xmath8 be a complete metric space and @xmath20 be two contractive mappings with fixed points @xmath21 and @xmath22 .
then @xmath23 where @xmath24 and @xmath25 is the contractivity factor of @xmath26 .
we are going to use a particular class of ifs operators , known as ifsm ( ifs with maps ) , introduced by forte and vrscay in 1994 .
let @xmath27 $ ] , @xmath28 be the lebesgue measure on @xmath29 ( the borel @xmath30-algebra ) and for any integer @xmath31 let @xmath32 denote the linear space of all real valued functions @xmath33 such that @xmath34 is integrable on @xmath35 . to build a contraction map @xmath7 on @xmath1 we need @xmath36-map contractive ifs i.e. a set of maps @xmath37 and a set of functions ( grey level maps ) @xmath38 with @xmath39 .
the operator @xmath7 corresponding to the @xmath36 map ifsm(@xmath40,@xmath41 ) is @xmath42 where the prime means that the sum operates on all those terms for which @xmath43 ( the inverse function of @xmath44 ) is defined .
let us define the following two sets @xmath45 @xmath46 @xcite let @xmath47 be an ifsm such that @xmath48 and @xmath49 for @xmath50 . then @xmath51 and for any @xmath52 we have @xmath53 where @xmath54 given @xmath55 the inverse problem consists of finding the operator @xmath7 such that @xmath56 in @xcite it is proved that this problem can be reduced to the determination of grey level maps @xmath57 which minimize the collage distance @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 in the special case when * @xmath61 i.e. the sets @xmath62 `` tile '' @xmath63 * @xmath64 for @xmath65 we say that the maps @xmath44 are nonoverlapping .
later , in the applications , we will assume that , for @xmath66 , * @xmath67 * @xmath68 * @xmath69 , @xmath70 the collage distance becomes @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 where @xmath74 @xmath58 is a quadratic form in @xmath75 and @xmath76 , that is @xmath77 where @xmath78 .
the matrix @xmath79 is symmetric and @xmath80 @xmath81 and @xmath82 . as in @xcite
we add an additional constraint in order to guarantee that the minimum of this quadratic form exists on a compact subset of feasible parameters @xmath75 and @xmath76 .
the additional constraint is @xmath83 the maps @xmath44 are choosen in an infinite set @xmath84 of fixed affine contraction maps on @xmath63 which has the @xmath28-dense and nonoverlapping property ( in the sense of the following definition ) ; when @xmath85 the corresponding @xmath44 is superfluous and the @xmath86-th term can be dropped from .
we say that @xmath84 generates a @xmath28-dense and nonoverlapping family @xmath87 of subsets of @xmath63 if for every @xmath88 and every @xmath89 there exists a finite set of integers @xmath90 , @xmath91 , @xmath66 , such that * @xmath92 * @xmath93 * @xmath94 if @xmath95 let @xmath96 be the @xmath36 truncations of @xmath40 .
let @xmath97 the @xmath36 vector of affine grey level maps .
let @xmath98 be the solution of the previous quadratic optimization problem and @xmath99 .
it can be shown that @xmath100 may be arbitrarly small when @xmath101 ( see @xcite ) .
let @xmath102 be a probability space and @xmath103 be a sequence of @xmath30-algebras such that @xmath104 .
let @xmath105 be a stochastic process in @xmath1 , that is a sequence of random variables @xmath106-adapted ( that is each variable @xmath107 is @xmath106-measurable ) .
given @xmath108 a trajectory of the process is the function @xmath109 belonging to @xmath1 . for a given @xmath107 , the trajectory of the stochastic process , the aim of the inverse problem consists in finding the parameters of the ifsm such that @xmath107 is the solution of the equation @xmath110 in this case the coefficients of the matrix @xmath79 and the vector @xmath111 of the previous section become @xmath112 and if @xmath113 it becomes @xmath114 the other elements in the matrix @xmath79 can be calculated as @xmath115 and @xmath116 for the vector @xmath111 @xmath117 and @xmath118 in the nonoverlapping case , we have * @xmath119 , @xmath65 , and @xmath120 , @xmath121 * @xmath122 , @xmath121 , @xmath65 and @xmath123 * @xmath124 , @xmath121 , @xmath65 and @xmath125 it also holds this self - similarity property .
let @xmath126 be the solution of the inverse problem with a set of nonverlapping maps @xmath44 and suppose that @xmath127 .
then @xmath128 for all @xmath129 .
in fact we have @xmath130 @xmath131 we suppose that a.e .
@xmath107 is an element of a subspace @xmath132 of @xmath1 and that @xmath107 is a zero - mean process .
let @xmath133 be the covariance function of this process that is @xmath134.\ ] ] and assume @xmath135 if @xmath136 comprises the entire spectrum of eigenvalues of @xmath133 , where @xmath137 and the associated orthonormal eigenfunctions @xmath138 form a complete set of the subspace @xmath132 then the kac and siegert decomposition holds : @xmath139 we also have that @xmath140 are uncorrelated random variables with mean @xmath141 and variance @xmath142 .
the following theorem states some properties of this decomposition .
suppose that @xmath143 and @xmath133 satisfies the properties above .
then * \i ) @xmath144 * \ii ) @xmath145 as @xmath146 a.s . *
\iii ) @xmath147 are with mean @xmath141 and variance @xmath142 * \iv ) @xmath148 where @xmath149 * \v ) @xmath150 ^ 2\to 0 $ ] for each t as @xmath146 * \vi ) @xmath151 with @xmath149 uncorrelated with mean @xmath141 and variance @xmath142 .
in the literature there several methods of simulation of the trajectory of the browian motion , i.e. the stochastic process @xmath153\}$ ] , such that @xmath154 a.s . , @xmath155 is distributed with gaussian law with zero mean and variance @xmath156 , and with independent increments . in this case
, the trajectory is obtained simulating the increments of @xmath157 in the following way : @xmath158 , @xmath159 , where the @xmath160 s are independent @xmath161 random variables . in
the other points the trajectory is built by linear interpolation of these simulated data .
karhunen - love / kac - siegert decomposition of @xmath157 is better for pathwise simulation @xmath162 with @xmath163 @xmath164 a basis of orthogonal functions and @xmath160 s are @xmath161 the trajectory generated by euler method is too simple and regular to mimic the roughness of the bm ; moreover the simulated path is stochastically equivalent to the true trajectory only on the points of the grid used in the simulation .
the kac - siegert decomposition of the bm is a pathwise approximation which can lead to a too smooth path ( see figure [ fig1 ] ) ; our idea is to use ifsm for generating fractal trajectories of the bm .
there are applications in finance ( for instance pricing of american options ) in which the whole path matters ; our ifsm approch produces a global approximation of the trajectory preserving the geometric fractal nature of the target .
this method can be also used to simulate paths of solutions of stochastic differential equations driven by brownian motion ( e.g. diffusion processes ) replacing the linear behaviour of the euler trajectory with a fractal object . )
pseudo - random gaussian numbers were used . ] for the solution of the inverse problem for the bm , we choose the so - called wavelet type maps @xcite , that is : @xmath165 with @xmath166 and @xmath167 for each fixed @xmath168 , the family @xmath169 is a set of nonoverlapping maps . for these maps @xmath170 . we organize them as follows @xmath171 to simulate a trajectory of @xmath157 with non overlapping maps we then need to simulate the joint distribution of all this objects 1 .
@xmath172 2 .
@xmath173 3 .
@xmath174 4 .
@xmath175 ) } b(t)dt$ ] 5 . @xmath176 but it appears to be still a too difficult problem . in practice , it is preferable to use all the above maps and not only the subset of non - overlapping maps . in this case , we need simulate the value of the trajectory of the brownian motion on a fixed grid ( using one of the known methods ) and we use these points to approximate the integrals in the quadratic form .
we then solve the constrained quadratic programming problem using standard algorithms ( see e.g. @xcite ) .
figure [ fig2 ] bottom shows an example of trajectory generated using the ifsm approach using wavelet type maps for @xmath177 , @xmath178 .
figure [ fig2 ] top represents the euler trajectory built on 50 gaussian terms which has been used to build the ifsm .
as one can notice the ifsm path shows more `` fractal '' complexity then the corresponding euler path .
we have proposed a new method to generate paths of the brownian motion .
these ifsm paths seems to mimic more closely the fractal nature of the trajectory of the brownian motion then existing schemes . at current stage
we are not able to show formal property of the ifsm path in terms of strong and weak approximation ( see @xcite ) .
open source software for generating ifsm trajectories written in c and r language @xcite is available via ` ifs ` package at http://cran.r-project.org for free download .
forte , b. , vrscay , e.r .
( 1998 ) , `` inverse problem methods for generalized fractal transforms '' , in _ fractal image encoding and analysis _ , nato asi series f , vol .
y. fisher , springer verlag , heidelberg .
|
paper solve inverse problem ifsm trajectories stochastic processes in @xmath0 method based on solution ifsm forte vrscay @xcite extension of classical ifs methods approximating element @xmath1 trajectories stochastic processes final goal simulation several methods available simulate paths stochastic processes brownian motion paths bm simulated using properties increments process euler scheme @xcite limit random walk @xmath0 decomposition kac - siegert / karnounen - loeve series paper propose ifsm operator fixed point trajectory bm representation simulate trajectories resulting simulated trajectories self - affine continuous fractal by construction produces realistic trajectories geometry closer to true bm s trajectories ifsm trajectory bm generate realistic solutions stochastic differential equations paper organized section [ sec : ifsm ] recalls theory ifsm @xmath0 section [ sec : l2 ] recalls details stochastic processes with trajectories @xmath0 link ifsm theory section [ sec : bm ] presents application ifsm theory problem simulation attention brownian motion idea of iterated function systems to historical papers fractals described by hutchinson 1981 result is banach theorem context given @xmath2 complete metric space find contractive operator @xmath4 unique fixed point @xmath5 @xmath6 small if inverse problem identify @xmath2 with operator @xmath7 fixed point fundamental theorems banach theorem let @xmath8 be complete metric space mapping @xmath4 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath12 contractivity factor of @xmath7 unique @xmath5 @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 collage theorem let @xmath8 complete metric space @xmath14 contractive map @xmath7 with contractivity factor @xmath11 if @xmath18 fixed point of @xmath7 @xmath19 let @xmath8 complete metric space @xmath20 be two contractive mappings with fixed points @xmath21 and @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 and @xmath25 is contractivity factor of @xmath26 class of ifs operators ifsm with maps introduced by forte and vrscay in 1994@xmath27 @xmath28 lebesgue measure @xmath29 @xmath30-algebra integer @xmath31 @xmath32 linear space valued functions @xmath33 @xmath34 integrable @xmath35 contraction map @xmath7 @xmath1 @xmath36-map contractive ifs maps @xmath37 functions @xmath38 @xmath39 operator @xmath7 @xmath36 map ifsm(@xmath40@xmath41 @xmath42 prime sum operates terms @xmath43 inverse function @xmath44 defined define sets @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 ifsm @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 inverse problem operator @xmath7 @xmath56 grey level maps @xmath57 minimize collage distance @xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath61 sets @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 maps @xmath44 nonoverlapping @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath70 collage distance becomes @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath58 quadratic form @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath78matrix @xmath79 symmetric @xmath80 additional constraint minimum quadratic form compact parameters @xmath75 @xmath76 additional constraint @xmath83 maps @xmath44 choosen infinite set @xmath84 fixed contraction maps @xmath63 @xmath28-dense nonoverlapping property @xmath85 @xmath44 superfluous @xmath86-th term dropped @xmath84 generates @xmath28-dense nonoverlapping family @xmath87 subsets @xmath63 @xmath88 @xmath89 finite set integers @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath66 @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath96 @xmath36 truncations @xmath40 @xmath97 @xmath36 vector affine grey level maps @xmath98 solution quadratic optimization problem @xmath99 @xmath100 arbitrarly small @xmath101 @xmath102 probability space @xmath103 sequence @xmath30-algebras @xmath105 stochastic process @xmath1 random variables @xmath106-adapted each variable @xmath107 @xmath106-measurable @xmath108 trajectory process function @xmath109 @xmath1@xmath107 trajectory stochastic process inverse problem parameters ifsm @xmath107 solution equation @xmath110 coefficients matrix @xmath79 vector @xmath111 become @xmath112 @xmath113 @xmath114 elements matrix @xmath79 calculated @xmath115 @xmath116 vector @xmath111 @xmath117 @xmath118 nonoverlapping case @xmath119 @xmath65 @xmath120 @xmath121 @xmath122 @xmath121 @xmath123 @xmath124 @xmath121 @xmath125 self - similarity property @xmath126 solution inverse problem nonverlapping maps @xmath44 @xmath127 @xmath128 @xmath129 @xmath130 @xmath131 @xmath107 element subspace @xmath132 @xmath1 @xmath107 zero - mean process @xmath133 covariance function @xmath134 @xmath135 @xmath136 eigenvalues @xmath133 @xmath137 orthonormal eigenfunctions @xmath138 form set subspace @xmath132 kac siegert decomposition holds @xmath139 @xmath140 uncorrelated random variables mean @xmath141 variance @xmath142 theorem states properties decomposition @xmath143 @xmath133 properties@xmath144 @xmath145 @xmath146 @xmath147 mean @xmath141 variance @xmath142 @xmath148 @xmath149 @xmath150 @xmath146 @xmath151 @xmath149 uncorrelated mean @xmath141 variance @xmath142 literature methods simulation trajectory browian motion stochastic process @xmath153 @xmath154 @xmath155 distributed gaussian law zero mean variance @xmath156 independent increments trajectory obtained simulating increments @xmath157 @xmath158 @xmath159 @xmath160 independent @xmath161 random variables other points trajectory built linear interpolation simulated data karhunen - love / kac - siegert decomposition @xmath157 better pathwise simulation @xmath162 @xmath163 @xmath164 orthogonal functions @xmath160 @xmath161 trajectory generated euler method simple regular mimic roughness bm simulated path stochastically equivalent true trajectory points grid kac - siegert decomposition bm pathwise approximation smooth path figure use ifsm generating fractal trajectories bmapplications in finance pricing of american options whole path matters ifsm approch produces global approximation of trajectory preserving geometric fractal nature target method simulate paths stochastic differential equations driven by brownian motion diffusion processes replacing linear behaviour euler trajectory with fractal object pseudo - random gaussian numbers used for solution inverse problem for bm choose wavelet type maps @xmath165 @xmath166 @xmath167 fixed @xmath168 @xmath169 nonoverlapping maps maps @xmath170 organize @xmath171 simulate trajectory of @xmath157 with non overlapping maps simulate joint distribution of objects @xmath172 @xmath173 @xmath174 @xmath175 @xmath176 difficult problem preferable to use all maps not non - overlapping maps simulate trajectory of brownian motion on fixed grid points approximate integrals in quadratic form solve constrained quadratic programming problem using standard algorithms figure fig2 ] trajectory generated using ifsm approach wavelet type maps for @xmath177 @xmath178 euler trajectory built on 50 gaussian terms build ifsm ifsm path shows fractal complexity euler path proposed new method generate paths brownian motion ifsm paths mimic fractal nature brownian show formal property ifsm path strong weak approximation @xcite open source software ifsm trajectories c r language @xcite available http://cran.r-project.org free download forte b. vrscay e.r. 1998 inverse problem methods generalized fractal transforms fractal image encoding analysis nato asi series f vol . y. fisher springer verlag heidelberg
| 0.496111
| 3,188
| 1,764
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,117
|
the spear 3 upgrade lattice will provide much reduced beam emittance to increase the brightness of synchrotron radiation beams from wigglers and undulators .
seven existing insertion devices will be used in the lattice . in this paper
we review the wiggler parameters , outline the wiggler compensation scheme , and evaluate wiggler effect on the optics and dynamic aperture .
slac
pub8233 + august 1999 + * effect of insertion devices in spear 3[multiblock footnote omitted ] * * abstract *
|
many of the drift sections in spear 3 will contain wigglers or undulators . in the present machine ,
there are 7 insertion devices ( i d ) . in this paper
, we review the magnetic parameters for each of these i d s , estimate linear and higher order wiggler effects , evaluate radiation effects , and discuss correction of wiggler focusing using quadrupole trim windings .
tracking results show that dynamic aperture reduction due to wiggler effects is modest .
all optics calculations were done with the mad code @xcite , and the tracking simulations with the lego code @xcite .
in spear 3 , the horizontally deflecting i d s reside in dispersion free straights where the unperturbed @xmath0 functions are @xmath1/@xmath210.1/4.8 m. the magnetic field parameters for each i d are given in table 1 , where @xmath3 is the number of periods , @xmath4 the period length , @xmath5 the peak field.=10 , @xmath4=0.18 , ( 2 ) @xmath3=15 , @xmath4=0.12 , ( 3 ) @xmath3=24 , @xmath4=0.07 , ( 4 ) @xmath3=30 , @xmath4=0.06 , and ( 5 ) elliptically polarized undulator ( epu ) . here , we chose the @xmath3=10 , @xmath4=0.18 wiggler . ]
future devices are likely to be @xmath610-period wigglers similar to beamlines 9 and 11
. these devices will replace the wigglers on beamlines 4 and 7 or illuminate new beam lines .
the main optical effects of the wigglers on the spear 3 lattice are also summarized in table 1 .
the parameter definitions and relevant formulas are listed below : ttttttttttttttttt = ttttttttttttt = bend radius @xmath7 + wiggler parameter @xmath8 + integrated focusing @xcite @xmath9 + linear tune shift @xmath10 + maximum @xmath0-beat @xmath11 + amplitude dependent @xmath12 + tune shift @xcite @xmath13 $ ] where @xmath14=5.23 is the vertical betatron tune , @xmath15 the vertical emittance , and @xmath16=3 gev the beam energy .
.wiggler parameters and main optics effects .
[ cols="<,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ tab : mult2 ] without correction of the wiggler focusing , the vertical dynamic aperture reduces by about 20% with all wigglers active . with corrected wiggler focusing
, linear wiggler effects alone do not reduce the aperture .
the study of wiggler multipole errors was based on measured systematic field errors in the wiggler on beamline 11 .
a numerical multipole fit to the measured data was performed and the results for the integral of normal and skew systematic multipole field are shown in table 3 , where ` @xmath17 ' is the multipole order starting with dipole , @xmath18 , and @xmath19 , @xmath20 are the skew and normal field coefficients defined as @xmath21 the effect of 7 wigglers on dynamic aperture is shown in fig .
[ fig : aper ] , with the aperture calculated at the i d locations ( @xmath1/@xmath210.1/4.8 m ) for machine simulations with all errors in the ring magnets . without multipole errors in the wigglers but with corrected wiggler focusing , the aperture is not affected . with the systematic multipole errors included in the 7 wigglers ,
the dynamic aperture reduction is about 10% ( 2 mm ) .
the wiggler - intrinsic high order terms ( eqn . [ eq : bx ] ) were not included in the previous simulation , but can further reduce the dynamic aperture . this field does not have the usual form of ( @xmath22-@xmath23 ) multipole expansion normally used in lattice codes . to accurately study the effect of the octupole - like and higher order terms in eqn .
[ eq : bx ] , one needs a symplectic model of this field .
we used an approximation to evaluate the main effect of these terms . since the non - linear @xmath24 field generates kicks only in @xmath23-plane , the effect on dynamic aperture
is expected to be mostly in the vertical plane , as it was observed in simulations for other machines @xcite .
one can notice that the @xmath24 field can be reproduced at @xmath22=0 by the normal field of eqn .
[ eq : bxby ] ( @xmath25=0 ) . using this approach , we used normal systematic multipoles in the form of @xmath26 to produce the non - linear terms of the wiggler field @xmath24 on the vertical axis ( eqn .
[ eq : bx ] ) , and performed tracking to evaluate vertical aperture near @xmath22=0 .
simulation of the octupole - like and dodecapole - like ( @xmath27 ) fields with 7 wigglers showed only modest reduction of vertical dynamic aperture , from 11 mm to 8 - 9 mm .
this aperture still remains well outside the 6 mm wiggler physical aperture .
tracking simulations with 7 wigglers in spear 3 predict small impact on dynamic aperture when linear optics effects are locally compensated with individually controlled quadrupole magnets .
the 18 mm horizontal dynamic aperture is sufficient for 10 mm injection oscillations and long touschek lifetime , and the vertical aperture remains well outside the 6 mm wiggler physical aperture . with all wigglers active , the increase in energy spread is negligible ( @xmath282% ) , and the beam horizontal emittance decreases to about 15.3 nm@xmath29rad at 3 gev .
we would like to thank m. cornacchia , h. wiedemann and b. hettel for useful discussions , suggestions and guidance .
99 h. grote , f. c. iselin , cern / sl/90 - 13 ( ap ) rev.4 ( 1994 ) .
y. cai _ et al .
_ , slac - pub-7642 ( 1997 )
. h. wiedemann , `` particle accelerator physics ii , '' springer - verlag , berlin , heidelberg ( 1995 ) .
l. smith , lbl - esg tech .
note-24 ( 1986 ) .
k. halbach , _ nim _ , a*187 * , p. 109
a. ropert , cern 90 - 03 , p. 142
|
drift sections in spear 3 contain wigglers 7 insertion devices review magnetic parameters estimate wiggler effects evaluate radiation effects discuss correction wiggler focusing using quadrupole trim windings dynamic aperture reduction due to wiggler effects modest optics calculations with mad code @xcite tracking simulations lego code @xcite spear 3 horizontally deflecting i d s in dispersion free straights functions @xmath1/@xmath210.1/4.8 m magnetic field parameters for in table 1 @xmath3 number periods @xmath4 period length @xmath5 peak field.18=15.12=24.07=30.06 polarized undulator chose @xmath3=10 , @xmath4=0.18 wiggler future devices @xmath610-period wigglers beamlines 9 11 replace wigglers on beamlines 4 7 or illuminate new beam lines main optical effects wigglers on spear 3 lattice summarized in table 1parameter definitions formulas = = bend radius @xmath7 + wiggler parameter + integrated focusing + linear tune shift + maximum @xmath0-beat + amplitude dependent + tune shift @xmath13 @xmath14=5.23 vertical betatron tune @xmath15 vertical emittance @xmath16=3 gev beam energy.wiggler parameters main optics effects without correction wiggler focusing vertical dynamic aperture reduces 20% all wigglers active corrected wiggler focusing linear wiggler effects reduce aperture study wiggler multipole errors based systematic field errors beamline 11 numerical multipole fit data performed results shown in table 3 @xmath17 multipole order skew normal field coefficients effect of 7 wigglers on dynamic aperture shown in fig . calculated at locations @xmath1/@xmath210.1/4.8 m ) without multipole errors corrected wiggler focusing aperture not affected systematic multipole errors in 7 wigglers dynamic aperture reduction about 10% ( 2 mm )wiggler - intrinsic high order terms not included previous simulation reduce dynamic aperture field usual @xmath22- multipole expansion effect octupole - like higher order terms needs symplectic model used approximation evaluate effect non - linear @xmath24 field generates kicks in @xmath23-plane effect dynamic aperture vertical plane @xmath24 field reproduced at @xmath22=0 by normal field eqn : bxby @xmath25=0 used normal multipoles @xmath26 produce non - linear terms wiggler field @xmath24 vertical axis performed tracking vertical aperture near @xmath22=0 simulation octupole - dodecapole - like fields with 7 wigglers modest reduction vertical dynamic aperture from 11 mm to 8 - 9 mm outside 6 mm wiggler physical aperture simulations with 7 wigglers predict small impact dynamic aperture when linear optics compensated with quadrupole magnets 18 mm horizontal dynamic aperture sufficient for 10 mm injection oscillations long touschek lifetime vertical aperture outside 6 mm wiggler physical aperturewigglers active energy spread negligible beam horizontal emittance decreases 15.3 nm 3 gev m cornacchia h wiedemann b hettel discussions suggestions guidance h. grote iselin cern sl/90 - 13 rev.4 1994 cai slac - pub-7642 1997 wiedemann particle accelerator physics ii springer - verlag berlin heidelberg 1995 l lbl - esg tech note-24 1986 k halbach*187 p. 109 ropert cern 90 - 03 p. 142
| 0.261849
| 1,508
| 755
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,134
|
we use the probability of error as a measure of distinguishability between two pure and two mixed symmetric coherent states in the context of continuous variable quantum cryptography .
we show that the two mixed symmetric coherent states ( in which the various components have the same real part ) never give an eavesdropper more information than two pure coherent states .
|
the security of coherent state continuous variable quantum key distribution ( cv - qkd ) @xcite is fundamentally based on the inability of an eavesdropper to perfectly distinguish between non - orthogonal quantum states @xcite . in this paper , we look at how much information a potential eavesdropper can gain when trying to distinguish between two pure coherent states as opposed to distinguishing between two mixed coherent states .
this is of particular interest in cv - qkd protocols , such as post - selection @xcite ) , where it is important to determine if an eavesdropper obtained more information in the case of distinguishing between two pure coherent states or distinguishing between two mixed states .
in our analysis , we will use the _ probability of error _ ( @xmath0 ) measure to distinguish between quantum states .
we point out that one could potentially consider other distinguishability measures such as the kolmogorov distance , the bhattacharyya coefficient and the shannon distinguishability ( for a review of these measures see @xcite ) .
however , as we shall see the probability of error measure has a number of useful properties and can be directly calculated for the quantum states we consider in our analysis .
we consider the distinguishability between two general quantum states that are described by the two density matrices @xmath1 and @xmath2 .
it was originally shown by helstrom @xcite that the probability of error between these two density matrices is minimized by performing an optimal positive operator - valued measure ( povm ) @xcite . in this case , the probability of error for the distinguishing between two general quantum states can be expressed as @xcite @xmath3 $ ] and @xmath4 are the eigenvalues of the matrix @xmath5 .
we note that when the two states are indistinguishable the probability of error is @xmath6 . on the other hand , in the case
when the two states are completely distinguishable the probability of error is @xmath7 . and
@xmath8 ) and ( b ) two mixed coherent states ( @xmath9 and @xmath10 ) . here the dotted lines and shadings in ( b ) indicate which of the two coherent states are mixed.,width=453 ]
we now look at distinguishing between two coherent states using the previously defined probability of error .
a coherent state is defined as @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the displacement operator .
it is also a minimum uncertainty state and an eigenstate of the annihilation operator @xmath13 , i.e. @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the amplitude of the electromagnetic wave @xcite .
any two coherent states @xmath16 and @xmath17 are always non - orthogonal and only approach orthogonality ( i.e. @xmath18 ) when @xmath19 where the magnitude is @xmath20 . in the following analysis
we will define a coherent state displace in the amplitude and phase quadratures @xcite , by an amount @xmath21 and @xmath22 respectively , as @xmath23 .
consequently , we can write the density operators of two pure coherent states @xmath24 and @xmath25 that we consider here as @xmath26 in our analysis we also consider two mixed coherent states , i.e. an equally weighted mixture of coherent states mirrored in the phase quadrature and with both mixtures having the same amplitude component .
the density operators corresponding to these two mixed states , @xmath27 and @xmath28 , are defined as @xmath29a ) and fig .
( [ two_mixed_vs_two_pure_discrete]b ) give a two - dimensional phase space illustration of the two pure coherent states and the two mixed coherent states defined by eq .
( 2 ) and eq .
( 3 ) respectively . according to eq . ( [ error_probability ] )
we need to determine the eigenvalues of @xmath30 for both the two pure states and two mixed states . to do this we write @xmath31 in its matrix representation which can be expanded in terms of the orthogonal fock or number states @xmath32 defined as @xcite @xmath33 where @xmath34 is the creation operator of a harmonic oscillator and @xmath35 .
for example , the coherent state @xmath36 written in terms of this fock basis is @xmath37 once @xmath31 is written in matrix form we can then numerically determine its eigenvalues . in this fock state expansion the inner product of an arbitrary coherent state with a fock state is given by @xmath38 where @xmath32 and @xmath39 are fock states . calculating the general matrix coefficients for the case of the two pure coherent states we obtain @xmath40\end{aligned}\ ] ] similarly for the two mixed state case we find @xmath41\end{aligned}\ ] ]
numerically we calculate the eigenvalues of eq .
( [ matrices_pure ] ) and eq .
( [ matrices_mixed ] ) up to certain values of @xmath42 and @xmath43 .
then according to eq .
( [ error_probability ] ) this will give us the probability of error in distinguishing between two quantum states .
now having numerically calculated @xmath0 we would like to interpret this in terms of the information gained from using the distinguishing measure .
in the context of cv - qkd it is important to determine how much shannon information an eavesdropper can obtain by distinguishing between two ( pure or mixed ) quantum states . the information obtained by distinguishing between two states can be calculated using the shannon information formula for a binary symmetric channel @xcite @xmath44 figure ( [ 3d_plot ] ) shows the difference between the shannon information obtained by distinguishing between two coherent states @xmath45 compared with distinguishing between two mixed states @xmath46 .
this information difference is defined as @xmath47 .
figure ( [ 3d_plot ] ) plots @xmath48 in terms of the amplitude and phase quadrature displacements of the pure and mixed states as defined in eq . ( 3 ) and eq .
( 4 ) , respectively . here
we have expanded up to @xmath49 fock states , i.e. @xmath50 in our numerical analysis .
there are two main features of this plot .
firstly , we notice that , given our distinguishability measure and initial configuration of coherent states in phase space , two mixed states never give more information than two pure state , i.e. @xmath51 .
secondly , there is a flat region where the information gain is zero , i.e. the information from distinguishing between two mixed states is the same as that of two pure states .
this means as we move the states further and further apart in the amplitude quadrature ( while keeping the phase quadrature fixed ) , the probability of error tends to zero and hence an information gain of zero .
the same result occurs when the amplitude quadrature is fixed while varying the phase quadrature .
this is somewhat surprising because the more separated two mixed states become the more indistinguishable they are and consequently less information can be extracted .
but in this case what it is telling us is that at some point the two mixed states start behaving " like two pure states . .
in this case the two mixed states never give more information than two pure states.,width=302 ]
in conclusion , we have shown that a continuous variable quantum key distribution protocol where an eavesdropper needs to distinguish between two pure coherent states , rather than two mixed coherent states ( where the various mixtures have the same amplitude component ) , the eavesdropper will never get more information from the two mixed coherent states .
we showed this using the probability of error as the distinguishability measure along with the shannon information formula .
|
security of coherent state continuous variable quantum key distribution ( ) @xcite based on inability eavesdropper to distinguish non - orthogonal quantum states information potential eavesdropper between two pure coherent states mixed interest in cv - qkd protocols post - selection important determine if eavesdropper more information distinguishing pure or mixed states probability of error _ ( @xmath0 ) measure to distinguish quantum states consider other distinguishability measures kolmogorov distance bhattacharyya coefficient shannon distinguishability probability of error measure has useful properties calculated for quantum states distinguishability between two general quantum states described by density matrices @xmath1 and @xmath2 by probability of error minimized by optimal positive operator - valued measure ( povm ) @xcite probability of error for distinguishing between two general quantum states expressed as @xcite @xmath3 and @xmath4 are eigenvalues of matrix @xmath5 when two states indistinguishable probability of error is @xmath6 . distinguishable probability error is @xmath7 two mixed coherent states ( @xmath9 and @xmath10 )dotted lines shadings in ( b ) indicate two coherent states mixed coherent states using probability error coherent state defined as @xmath11 @xmath12 displacement operator minimum uncertainty state eigenstate of annihilation operator @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 amplitude electromagnetic wave @xcite two coherent states @xmath16 @xmath17 non - orthogonal approach orthogonality @xmath18 when @xmath19 magnitude @xmath20 coherent state amplitude phase quadratures @xcite @xmath21 @xmath22 as @xmath23 density operators of pure coherent states @xmath24 @xmath25 as @xmath26 two mixed coherent states equally weighted same amplitude component density operators mixed states @xmath27 @xmath28 defined as @xmath29a fig . two_mixed_vs_two_pure_discrete]b two - dimensional phase space illustration two pure mixed states defined by eq . ( 2 ) ( 3 ) determine eigenvalues of @xmath30 for two pure mixed stateswrite @xmath31 matrix representation expanded orthogonal fock states @xmath32 @xcite @xmath33 @xmath34 creation operator harmonic oscillator @xmath35 coherent state @xmath36 fock basis is @xmath37 @xmath31 written matrix form numerically determine eigenvalues fock state expansion inner product arbitrary coherent state fock state @xmath38 @xmath32 @xmath39 fock states calculating matrix coefficients two pure coherent states obtain @xmath40\end{aligned} two mixed state case find @xmath41\end{aligned} calculate eigenvalues of eq matrices_pure matrices_mixed to values @xmath42 @xmath43 eq error_probability probability of error distinguishing between two quantum states numerically calculated @xmath0 interpret information distinguishing measure determine shannon information distinguishing between two pure or mixed quantum states information distinguishing calculated shannon information formula for binary symmetric channel @xcite @xmath44 figure 3d_plot shows difference shannon information distinguishing coherent states @xmath45 mixed states @xmath46 information difference defined as @xmath47 .figure 3d_plot plots @xmath48 amplitude phase quadrature displacements of pure and mixed states defined in eq . 3 ) and eq . ( 4 ) expanded to @xmath49 fock states @xmath50 in numerical analysis two main features plot two mixed states never give more information than two pure state @xmath51 flat region where information gain is zero information from distinguishing between two mixed states same as two pure states move states further apart in amplitude quadrature phase quadrature fixed probability of error zero information gain zero same result when amplitude quadrature fixed while varying phase quadrature more separated mixed states become more indistinguishable less information extracted two mixed states start behaving like two pure states never give more information than two pure states shown continuous variable quantum key distribution protocol eavesdropper distinguish between two pure coherent states mixed states never more information from two mixed coherent states showed using probability of error as distinguishability measure shannon information formula
| 0.266554
| 1,643
| 850
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,138
|
we show that due to the large coupling constant of the monopole - photon interaction the possibility that monopolium , and therefore monopole - antimonopole , decay into many photons must be contemplated experimentally .
* multiphoton annihilation of monopolium * h. fanchiotti@xmath0 , c.a .
garca canal@xmath0 and v. vento@xmath1 _ @xmath0iflp / conicet and departamento de fsica _ + _ universidad nacional de la plata , c.c.67 , 1900 , la plata , argentina _
+ _ @xmath1departamento de fsica terica - ific .
universidad de valencia - csic .
_ + _ e-46100 , burjassot ( valencia ) , spain _ inspired by an old idea of dirac and zeldovich @xcite we proposed that monopolium , a bound state of monopole anti - monopole @xcite could be easiaer to detect experimentally than free monopoles @xcite .
we have studied the annihilation of monopolium into two photons @xcite . in here
we are going to argue and explicitly show that monopolium might annihilate most preferably into many low energy photons .
the same type of arguments hint that monopole - antimonopole also annihilate most preferably into many low energy photons .
0.3 cm 0.3 cm let us assume that the monopole - photon coupling is described by some complicated effective vertex of the form @xmath2 , as shown in fig .
[ vertex ] where @xmath3 is the dressed monopole magnetic coupling constant , @xmath4 being the momentum transfer in the vertex , and @xmath5 a function containing all the non perturbative behavior associated with the large magnetic coupling of the monopole , which is normalized so that @xmath6 .
recalling the parapositronium @xcite results rewritten in terms of the effective vertex we get , @xmath7 where @xmath8 by dirac s quantization condition ( dqc ) @xcite . in fig .
[ multiphoton ] we show one of the @xmath9 contributions to the amplitude for a @xmath10 photon decay , and we note that this type of contributions in the above ratios are determined only by vertices and propagators . in the rest frame of the bound system the annihilation into many photons leads to an average momentum for each photon much smaller than the mass of monopolium and therefore much smaller than the mass of the monopole . in order to make an estimate of the above ratios we assume that in the propagators the monopole mass dominates over the momentum and therefore the calculation of the width , in units of monopole mass , depends exclusively on three factors : the number of diagrams @xmath11 , the photons symmetry factor @xmath12 and the phase space of outgoing massless particles , namely 1.0 cm 0.3 cm @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the monopolium mass and @xmath15 being @xmath10 the number of photons emitted . with all these approximations
we obtain @xmath16 since the photon momenta on the average are going to be small , we can further substitute @xmath17 .
this approximation is valid for dirac s original formulation .
some coupling schemes lead to small effective couplings at threshold @xcite . in these cases
the analysis has to be carried out off threshold . in fig .
[ ration2 ] we plot eq.([ratio ] ) for two different binding energies and note that we get bell shape distributions . for small binding energies ( @xmath18 ) @xmath19 with @xmath20 . for @xmath21 @xmath22 with @xmath23.thus
the multiplicity decreases as the binding energy increases .
we now study the dependence of multiplicity with the binding energy .
to do so we find the maxima of the ratio in eq.([ratio ] ) as a function of binding energy . the result is plotted in fig .
[ ratiobindingexact ] were we show the binding energy in units of monopole mass as a function of the average photon multiplicity in the annihilation .
the outcome is clear , large average multiplicities,10 - 12 photons , arise if the binding energy is small , @xmath24 , while smaller average multiplicities , 4 - 6 photons , occur for large bindings , @xmath21 . in the latter case
considerable rates extend up to multiplicities of 8 photons . 0.3 cm we can get an analytic result for small bindings , i.e. large @xmath25 , by obtaining the maximum of the logarithm of eq.([ratio ] ) using sterling s formula ( @xmath26 ) . the maxima are given by the zeros of @xmath27 which for large @xmath25 has the approximate solution @xmath28 and implies a multiplicity of @xmath29 .
present searches of low mass monopoles have been carried out by making use of their magnetic properties trapped in matter , by looking for tracks associated with their ionization properties and by studying two photon decays at colliders @xcite . at colliders like the tevatron or the lhc
the conservation of magnetic charge implies that either monopolium or a pair monopole - antimonopole could be produced .
monopolium , being chargeless , is difficult to detect except for its decay properties .
if monopole - antimonopole are produced close to threshold they might annihilate given their large interaction before reaching the detector .
in this experimental scenario we might not have been able to detect monopolium and/or monopoles because we have been looking into trapped monopoles , ionization remnants or the two photon channel , which according to our present investigation is most unlikely .
our analysis shows that a characteristic feature of monopolium decay is many photons arising from the annihilation vertex . at the monopolium threshold
, these photons will have on average much smaller energy than the energy of a typical collider process .
the same type of argument applies to monopole - antimonopole annihilation . to conclude we state , that as long as the exact dynamics of monopoles and their properties are unknown , large multiplicity of photon events might be the signal for the discovery of these elusive particles .
|
the work has been partially supported by anpcyt and conicet of argentina , and by mineco ( spain ) grant .
fpa2013 - 47443-c2 - 1-p , gva - prometeoii/2014/066 and sev-2014 - 0398 .
y. b. zeldovich and m. y. khlopov , phys .
b * 79 * ( 1978 ) 239 .
c. t. hill , nucl .
b * 224 * ( 1983 ) 469 .
doi:10.1016/0550 - 3213(83)90386 - 3 v. vento , int .
j. mod .
phys . a * 23 * ( 2008 ) 4023 doi:10.1142/s0217751x08041669 [ arxiv:0709.0470 [ astro - ph ] ] .
l. n. epele , h. fanchiotti , c. a. garcia canal and v. vento , eur .
j. c * 56 * ( 2008 ) 87 doi:10.1140/epjc / s10052 - 008 - 0628 - 0 [ hep - ph/0701133 ] .
l. n. epele , h. fanchiotti , c. a. g. canal , v. a. mitsou and v. vento , eur .
j. plus * 127 * ( 2012 ) 60 doi:10.1140/epjp / i2012 - 12060 - 8 [ arxiv:1205.6120 [ hep - ph ] ] .
l. n. epele , h. fanchiotti , c. a. g. canal , v. a. mitsou and v. vento , arxiv:1607.05592 [ hep - ph ] .
k. a. milton , rept .
* 69 * ( 2006 ) 1637 doi:10.1088/0034 - 4885/69/6/r02 [ hep - ex/0602040 ] .
a. billoire , r. lacaze , a. morel and h. navelet , phys .
lett . * 78b * ( 1978 ) 140 .
doi:10.1016/0370 - 2693(78)90367 - 2 t. muta and t. niuya , prog .
* 68 * ( 1982 ) 1735 .
doi:10.1143/ptp.68.1735 a. czarnecki and s. g. karshenboim , hep - ph/9911410 .
l. patrizii and m. spurio , ann .
nucl . part .
* 65 * ( 2015 ) 279 doi:10.1146/annurev - nucl-102014 - 022137 [ arxiv:1510.07125 [ hep - ex ] ] .
b. acharya _ et al . _
[ moedal collaboration ] , int .
j. mod .
a * 29 * ( 2014 ) 1430050 doi:10.1142/s0217751x14300506 [ arxiv:1405.7662 [ hep - ph ] ] .
b. acharya _ et al .
_ [ moedal collaboration ] , jhep * 1608 * ( 2016 ) 067 doi:10.1007/jhep08(2016)067 [ arxiv:1604.06645 [ hep - ex ] ] .
b. acharya _ et al . _
[ moedal collaboration ] , phys .
* 118 * ( 2017 ) no.6 , 061801 doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.061801 [ arxiv:1611.06817 [ hep - ex ] ] .
|
work supported anpcyt conicet argentina mineco spain grant fpa2013 - 47443-c2 - - prometeoii/2014/066 sev-2014 - 0398 zeldovich khlopov. 79 1978 ) 239 hill nucl 224 1983 ) 469 doi:10.1016/0550 - 3213(83)90386 - vento 23 2008 ) 4023 doi:10.1142/s0217751x08041669 arxiv:0709.0470 epele fanchiotti garcia canal vento 56 2008 ) 87 doi:10.1140/epjc s10052 - 008 - 0628 - hep - ph/0701133 epele fanchiotti canal mitsou vento 127 2012 ) 60 doi:10.1140/epjp - 12060 - 8:1205.6120 ph epele fanchiotti canal mitsou vento arxiv:1607.05592 hep ph milton rept. 69 2006 ) 1637 doi:10.1088/0034 - 4885/69/6/r02 hep - ex/0602040 billoire lacaze morel navelet 78b 1978 ) 140 doi:10.1016/0370 - 2693(78)90367 - mutaprog 68 1982 1735.1143/ptp.68.1735 czarnecki karshenboim hep - ph/9911410 patrizii spurio nucl 65 2015 279.1146/annurev - nucl-102014 - 022137 arxiv:1510.07125 hep - ex acharya moedal collaboration int 29 2014 1430050.1142/s0217751x14300506 arxiv:1405.7662 hep - ph acharya moedal collaboration 1608 2016 067.1007/jhep08(2016)067 arxiv:1604.06645 hep - ex acharya moedal collaboration. 118 2017 ) no.6 061801.1103/physrevlett.118.061801 arxiv:1611.06817 hep - ex
| 0.131311
| 930
| 511
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,146
|
fully relativistic calculations of radiative rates and electron impact excitation cross sections for fex are used to derive theoretical emission - line ratios involving transitions in the 174366 wavelength range .
a comparison of these with solar active region observations obtained during the 1989 and 1995 flights of the solar extreme - ultraviolet research telescope and spectrograph ( serts ) reveals generally very good agreement between theory and experiment .
several fex emission features are detected for the first time in serts spectra , while the 3s@xmath03p@xmath1 @xmath0p@xmath23s@xmath03p@xmath3(@xmath4s)3d @xmath0d@xmath2 transition at 195.32 is identified for the first time ( to our knowledge ) in an astronomical source . the most useful fex electron density ( n@xmath5 ) diagnostic line ratios
are assessed to be 175.27/174.53 and 175.27/177.24 , which both involve lines close in wavelength and free from blends , vary by factors of 13 between n@xmath5 = 10@xmath6 and 10@xmath7@xmath8 , and yet show little temperature sensitivity .
should these lines not be available , then the 257.25/345.74 ratio may be employed to determine n@xmath5 , although this requires an accurate evaluation of the instrument intensity calibration over a relatively large wavelength range .
however , if the weak 324.73 line of fex is reliably detected , the use of 324.73/345.74 or 257.25/324.73 is recommended over 257.25/345.74 .
electron densities deduced from 175.27/174.53 and 175.27/177.24 for the stars procyon and @xmath9 cen , using observations from the extreme - ultraviolet explorer ( euve ) satellite , are found to be consistent and in agreement with the values of n@xmath5 determined from other diagnostic ratios in the euve spectra .
a comparison of several theoretical extreme - ultraviolet fex line ratios with experimental values for a @xmath10-pinch , for which the plasma parameters have been independently determined , reveals reasonable agreement between theory and observation , providing some independent support for the accuracy of the adopted atomic data .
[ firstpage ] atomic data sun : activity sun : corona sun : ultraviolet .
|
emission lines arising from transitions in fex have been widely detected in solar extreme - ultraviolet ( euv ) spectra ( see , for example , dere 1978 ; thomas & neupert 1994 ) . jordan ( 1965 ) first proposed the use of fex lines to determine the electron density in the solar corona , while jordan ( 1966 ) employed euv transitions of fex and other fe ions to derive both the electron density and coronal fe abundance .
since then , several authors have undertaken analyses of the solar euv spectrum of fex , including for example nussbaumer ( 1976 ) and bhatia & doschek ( 1995 ) . to date , the most complete study is probably that of del zanna , berrington & mason ( 2004 ) , which also provides an excellent review of previous work on fex .
the theoretical line ratios calculated by del zanna et al .
employ radiative rates generated with the superstructure code by either bhatia & doschek ( 1995 ) or themselves . for electron impact excitation rates , they use results for transitions among the lowest 31 fine - structure levels of fex calculated with the breit - pauli rmatrx code , either by pelan & berrington ( 2001 ) or once again by themselves .
recently , aggarwal & keenan ( 2004 , 2005 ) have used the fully relativistic grasp and dirac rmatrx codes to calculate radiative rates and electron impact excitation cross sections , respectively , for transitions among the energetically lowest 90 fine - structure levels of fex . in this paper
we use these results , plus additional atomic data presented here , to generate theoretical emission - line ratios for fex , and compare these with high resolution spectra from the solar extreme - ultraviolet research telescope and spectrograph ( serts ) .
our aims are threefold , namely to ( i ) assess the importance of blending in the serts observations , ( ii ) detect new fex emission lines , and ( iii ) identify the best fex line ratios for use as electron density diagnostics .
this work is of particular relevance due to the recent launch of the _ hinode _ mission , which has on board the euv imaging spectrometer ( eis ) , covering the 170211 and 246292 wavelength ranges ( culhane et al .
2007 ) , similar to the serts spectral coverage of 170225 and 235450 ( thomas & neupert 1994 ) .
it is clearly important that emission lines observed by the eis are fully assessed , and the best diagnostics identified .
serts provides the ideal testbed for this , due to its larger wavelength coverage , allowing more lines from the same species to be detected and compared with theoretical predictions .
furthermore , the best serts spectral resolution is about 0.03 [ full width at half - maximum ( fwhm ) ] , obtained for the 170225 wavelength range observed in second - order ( brosius , davila & thomas 1998a ) , which is a full factor of two better than the 0.0650.075 resolution available from eis ( young et al .
hence the serts data sets should allow emission features to be resolved and assessed which are blended in eis spectra .
indeed , this is illustrated by our previous work on fexiii ( keenan et al .
2007 ) , where we resolved the 203.79 and 203.83 features which are blended in eis observations ( young et al . 2007 ) .
serts has had a total of 10 successful flights over the period 19822000 , each featuring a somewhat different set of optical components and observing targets .
we have selected data from two of these for analysis here , as they provide the most complete sequence of well - observed fex emission lines .
the flight on 1989 may 5 ( henceforth referred to as serts89 ) carried a standard gold - coated toroidal diffraction grating , and was the first to observe a strong solar active region , noaa 5464 .
it detected hundreds of first - order emission lines in the 235450 wavelength range , plus dozens of features spanning 170225 , which appeared in second - order among the 340450 first - order lines ( thomas & neupert 1994 ) .
the spectrum was recorded on kodak 10107 emulsion , at a spectral resolution of 5080m ( fwhm ) in first - order , and a spatial resolution of approximately 7 arcsec ( fwhm ) .
this combination of high spectral resolution , strong signal , and broad wavelength coverage remains unsurpassed even today as the best available data set for investigating imaged solar emission features over the full wavelength range of 235450 , and hence are used in the present paper .
subsequent serts flights employed either a multilayer - coated diffraction grating or ccd - detector arrays which provided important technical advantages , but which also restricted the spectral bandpass that could be covered , making their data less suitable for the present study ( see keenan et al . 2007 and references therein ) .
the one exception was the flight on 1995 may 15 ( henceforth referred to as serts95 ) which incorporated a multilayer - coated toroidal diffraction grating that enhanced its sensitivity to second - order features in the 170225 wavelength range ( brosius et al
. 1998a ) .
it observed active region noaa 7870 , again using kodak 10107 emulsion , and had an improved spatial resolution of approximately 5 arcsec .
its unique shortwave multilayer coating led to the detection of many second - order emission lines not seen on previous serts flights ( thomas & neupert 1994 ; brosius et al .
1996 ) , and furthermore obtained the highest spectral resolution ( 0.03 fhwm ) ever achieved for spatially resolved active region spectra in this wavelength range .
the serts95 data therefore provide the best observations for investigating fex emission lines in the 170225 region , and hence are employed in this paper .
further details of the serts95 observations , and the wavelength and absolute flux calibration procedures employed in the data reduction , may be found in brosius et al .
( 1998a , b ) .
similar information for the serts89 spectrum is available from thomas & neupert ( 1994 ) .
we note that although the relative intensity calibration curves in both cases involved fitting to calculations of insensitive line - ratio pairs , fex lines made up less than 10% of the points utilized in those procedures .
furthermore , detailed comparisons of line ratio calculations for many ions with serts measurements have revealed generally very good agreement between theory and observation , providing support for the serts intensity calibrations ( see , for example , keenan et al .
2007 and references therein ) . thus ,
even without fully independent intensity calibrations , the serts results still provide a valid test for the new fex calculations presented here .
it should also be noted that the serts95 first - order calibration curve was extrapolated from its fitted range of 238336 to cover its complete bandpass . hence there is some extra uncertainty in the intensities of lines with wavelengths greater than 340 measured from this flight .
however , no such problem exists with the serts89 measurements of these lines .
we have searched for fex emission lines in the serts89 and serts95 spectra using the detections of thomas & neupert ( 1994 ) and brosius et al .
( 1998b ) , supplemented with those from other sources , including the nist database , the latest version ( v5.2 ) of the chianti database ( dere et al .
1997 ; landi et al .
2006 ) , the atomic line list of van hoof , peter / atomic/ ] and in particular the excellent summary of line identifications by del zanna et al . ( 2004 ) .
the latter provides not only a comprehensive list of wavelengths for well - observed fex transitions , but also indicates alternative wavelengths where previous identifications are not consistent with their conclusions . in table 1
we list the fex transitions found in the serts89 and serts95 spectra , along with their measured wavelengths .
we also indicate possible blending features or alternative identifications as suggested by thomas & neupert or brosius et al . in their original line lists . [ cols="^,<,<",options="header " , ] @xmath11from datla et al .
+ @xmath12present theoretical line ratios and those from chianti calculated for the measured plasma parameters .
our comparison of theoretical fex emission - line intensity ratios with solar active region spectra from the serts 1989 and 1995 flights reveals generally very good agreement between theory and experiment , with several features identified for the first time in the serts data sets , including fex 193.72 , 220.26 and 324.73 , plus fexi 201.56 and the feix / x blend at 175.48 .
in addition , the 195.32 transition of fex is detected for the first time ( to our knowledge ) in an astronomical source .
we find that the ratios 175.27/174.53 and 175.27/177.24 provide the best fex electron density diagnostics , as they involve lines which are strong and free from blends , are close in wavelength and the ratios are highly n@xmath5sensitive .
should these lines not be available , then the 257.25/345.74 ratio may be employed as a diagnostic , although this requires an accurate determination of the instrument intensity calibration over a relatively large wavelength range . however ,
if the weak 324.73 line is reliably detected , then the use of 324.73/345.74 or 257.25/324.73 is recommended in preference to 257.25/345.74 .
kma acknowledges financial support from epsrc , while dbj is grateful to the department of education and learning ( northern ireland ) and nasa s goddard space flight center for the award of a studentship .
the serts rocket programme is supported by rtop grants from the solar physics office of nasa s space physics division .
jwb acknowledges additional nasa support under grant nag513321 .
fpk is grateful to awe aldermaston for the award of a william penney fellowship .
the authors thank peter van hoof for the use of his atomic line list .
chianti is a collaborative project involving the naval research laboratory ( usa ) , rutherford appleton laboratory ( uk ) , and the universities of florence ( italy ) and cambridge ( uk ) .
|
emission lines from transitions in fex detected in solar ultraviolet spectra dere 1978 thomas neupert 1994 jordan ( 1965 ) proposed fex lines electron density solar corona jordan 1966 ) employed euv transitions of fex electron density coronal fe abundance authors solar euv spectrum fex nussbaumer 1976 bhatia & doschek ( 1995 ) complete study del zanna berrington mason ( 2004 ) fex theoretical line ratios by del zanna employ radiative rates code for electron impact excitation rates results for transitions lowest 31 levels of fex with - pauli rmatrx code aggarwal & keenan ( 2004 2005 used relativistic grasp dirac rmatrx codes to calculate radiative rates electron impact excitation sections for transitions lowest 90 levels of fex paper results additional data to generate theoretical emission - line ratios for fex compare with spectra from solar extreme - ultraviolet research telescope spectrograph aims to assess importance of blending in serts observations detect new fex emission lines identify best fex line ratios for electron density diagnosticswork due to launch hinode _ mission euv imaging spectrometer eis covering 170211 and 246292 wavelength ranges ( culhane 2007 ) similar to serts spectral coverage 170225 and 235450 ( 1994 ) important emission lines observed by eis assessed best diagnostics identified serts ideal testbed larger wavelength coverage more lines from same species detected compared with predictions best serts spectral resolution about 0.03 for 170225 wavelength range factor two better than 0.0650.075 resolution from eis serts data sets should allow emission features resolved assessed blended in eis spectra illustrated by previous work on fexiii resolved 203.79 and 203.83 features blended in eis observations serts 10 successful flights 19822000 each different optical components observing targets selected data from two for analysis complete sequence of fex emission lines flight on 1989 may 5 serts89 ) carried standard gold - coated toroidal diffraction grating first to observe strong solar active region , noaa 5464 .detected hundreds first - order emission lines 235450 wavelength range dozens features 170225 second - order 340450 first - order lines thomas neupert 1994 spectrum recorded kodak 10107 emulsion spectral resolution 5080m ( fwhm ) first - order spatial resolution 7 arcsec high spectral resolution strong signal broad wavelength coverage best data set investigating solar emission features 235450 used present paper subsequent serts flights employed multilayer - coated diffraction grating ccd - detector arrays advantages restricted spectral bandpass less suitable present study 2007 exception flight 1995 may 15 serts95 ) multilayer - coated toroidal diffraction grating enhanced second - order features 170225 wavelength range brosius observed active region noaa 7870 kodak 10107 emulsion improved spatial resolution 5 arcsec unique shortwave multilayer coating led detection second - order emission lines obtained highest spectral resolution 0.03 fhwm ) spatially resolved active region spectra serts95 data best observations investigating fex emission lines 170225 region employed paperdetails serts95 observations wavelength absolute flux calibration procedures in brosius et al . 1998a similar information serts89 spectrum from thomas & neupert ( 1994 ) relative intensity calibration curves insensitive line - ratio pairs fex lines less than 10% of points detailed comparisons of line ratio calculations with serts measurements good agreement theory observation support for serts intensity calibrations keenan et al . 2007 without independent intensity calibrations serts results provide valid test for new fex calculations serts95 first - order calibration curve extrapolated from range 238336 complete bandpass extra uncertainty in intensities lines with wavelengths greater than 340 no problem with serts89 measurements searched for fex emission lines in serts89 serts95 spectra using detections thomas & neupert 1994 brosius et al . 1998b ) supplemented with other sources nist database chianti database 2006 atomic line list of hoof summary line identifications by del zanna et al . ( 2004 ) provides comprehensive list wavelengths for fex transitions indicates alternative wavelengths where identificationstable 1 fex transitions serts89 spectra measured wavelengths possible blending features alternative identifications suggested thomas neupert brosius et al . original line lists @xmath11from @xmath12present theoretical line ratios chianti measured plasma parameters comparison theoretical fex emission - line intensity ratios with solar active region spectra serts 1989 1995 flights reveals good agreement theory experiment features identified first time serts fex 193.72 220.26 324.73 fexi 201.56 feix / x blend at 175.48 195.32 transition fex detected first time astronomical source ratios 175.27/174.53 175.27/177.24 provide best fex electron density diagnostics lines strong free from blends close wavelength highly n@xmath5sensitive lines 257.25/345.74 ratio diagnostic instrument intensity calibration weak 324.73 line detected use 324.73/345.74 or 257.25/324.73 recommended kma financial support epsrc dbj grateful department of education learning nasa s goddard space flight center studentshipserts rocket programme supported grants solar physics office nasa jwb acknowledges nasa support grant nag513321 fpk aldermaston william penney fellowship authors thank peter van hoof atomic line list chianti collaborative project naval research laboratory rutherford appleton laboratory universities florence cambridge
| 0.352658
| 2,313
| 1,193
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,163
|
we analyze the systematic errors in the positions of bursts in the batse 1b , 2b and 3b catalogs , using a likelihood approach .
we use the batse data in conjunction with 196 single ipn arcs .
we assume circular gaussian errors , and that the total error is the sum in quadrature of the systematic error @xmath0 and statistical error @xmath1 , as prescribed by the batse catalog .
we find that the 3b burst positions are inconsistent with the value @xmath2 stated in the batse 3b catalog . -8pt
|
-8pt the stated systematic error in the batse 3b catalog@xcite burst locations is @xmath2 .
this value was estimated by taking the rms deviation of batse positions from known positions of 36 bursts , determined by the ipn , watch , and comptel@xcite .
unfortunately , many of these same known positions were used to calibrate the batse burst location software , i.e. , as a guide in determining what effects to include in the burst location algorithm . in order to calibrate properly the batse burst position errors , an independent set of burst locations
is needed .
such a set exists , in the form of 196 bursts for which single ipn arcs exist@xcite . in this paper
we analyze the systematic errors in the positions of bursts in the batse 1b , 2b and 3b catalogs using these 196 bursts .
our analysis is based upon the likelihood approach . -8pt
-8pt we assume that the systematic error @xmath0 and statistical error @xmath1 in position are circular gaussians , to be added in quadrature , as prescribed by the batse catalog .
the circular approximation should be good , since roughly @xmath3 of all batse bursts have @xmath4 positional contours that are nearly circular@xcite , and the bursts with ipn arcs tend to be those with larger fluences .
we further assume that the sky is flat ( i.e. , that the size of the total error in the batse burst position is not too large ) , and that the ipn arcs have zero width .
the former is a good approximation , since the largest batse @xmath5 among the bursts with ipn arcs .
the latter is a good approximation since the characteristic width of the 3-@xmath6 contours of the ipn arcs is a few arcminutes , which is much less than the smallest batse @xmath7 .
figure 1 .
configurations for a burst with a known position ( left diagram ) and for a burst with a single ipn arc ( right diagram ) .
the likelihood function for bursts with known positions ( e.g. , two intersecting ipn arcs ) is given by @xmath8 whereas the likelihood function for bursts with single ipn arcs is given by @xmath9 here , @xmath10 is the deviation of the batse position from the known position , @xmath11 is the perpendicular deviation of the batse position from the ipn arc ( see figure 1 ) , and @xmath12 .
the likelihood function @xmath13 allows exploration of any model that we may have for @xmath0 .
here we focus on three models : ( 1 ) @xmath0 = a constant , ( 2 ) @xmath14 erg @xmath15 , and ( 3 ) @xmath16 .
the first model has one free parameter ( @xmath0 ) ; the second and third models have two free parameters ( scale factor @xmath17 and power law index @xmath18 ) . -8pt
-6pt fitting the constant @xmath0 model to the 18 batse 3b bursts with ipn positions , we find a maximum likelihood ( ml ) value @xmath19 .
this is consistent with the value of @xmath20 quoted in the batse 3b catalog@xcite , which was found using these bursts and some others . with the value of @xmath20 quoted in the batse 3b catalog , as shown by the probability distribution in @xmath0 ( see figure 2 ) and comparison of the expected and observed distribution of normalized deviations @xmath22 assuming @xmath2 ( see figure 3 ) . figure 4 .
upper left - hand and lower and upper right - hand panels : 1-@xmath6 , 2-@xmath6 , and 3-@xmath6 contours in the ( @xmath23)-plane for the burst samples and data as labeled , assuming the @xmath1-dependent model .
lower left - hand panel : same as figure 2 , except for the @xmath24-dependent model . fitting the third model , in which @xmath29
, we find ml values @xmath30 and @xmath31 ( see figure 4 ) .
the probability @xmath32 , showing that the data strongly prefer the power - law model over the ml model with constant @xmath33 .
these results imply that @xmath0 is strongly correlated with @xmath34 and @xmath1 .
for example , @xmath35 while @xmath36 .
this is illustrated in figure 5 , which shows the ml @xmath34-dependent and @xmath24-dependent models .
figure 5 .
left - hand panel : the ml @xmath34-dependent model .
right - hand panel : the ml @xmath1-dependent model .
the points are _ not _ data points , but rather are the ml _ constant _ @xmath0 model for the given interval in @xmath34 or @xmath1 .
it is also interesting to examine the character of @xmath0 for subsets of the 3b catalog , in particular the 1b sample of bursts in which evidence for repeating was found .
fitting the three models to the `` old '' 1b positions , we find @xmath37 for the ml constant @xmath0 model , and that the data do not request a more complicated model(see figures 3 and 4 ) .
in contrast , fitting the 3b positions for the 1b sample of bursts , we find that the data request the @xmath1-dependent model at the 95% confidence level [ e.g. , @xmath38 ( again see figures 3 and 4 ) .
these results imply that for the 1b sample of bursts , the new ( 3b ) @xmath0 s are smaller than the old ( 1b ) ones for bursts with @xmath39 erg @xmath40 or with @xmath41 .
however , for the @xmath42 80% of bursts with lower fluences or larger @xmath1 s , they imply that the new @xmath0 s are larger than the old ones .
we are grateful to kevin hurley for providing us with the 3rd catalog of ipn arcs , without which this analysis would not have been possible .
we also wish to thank geoff pendleton and michael briggs for discussing batse burst location issues with us .
|
systematic error in batse 3b catalog@xcite burst locations is @xmath2 estimated by rms deviation of positions from positions of 36 bursts positions used to batse burst location software algorithm burst position errors independent set of burst locations needed 196 bursts single ipn arcs exist@xcite analyze systematic errors in positions bursts in batse 1b 2b 3b catalogs using 196 bursts analysis based likelihood approach assume systematic error @xmath0 and statistical error @xmath1 in position are circular gaussians added in quadrature by catalog circular approximation good @xmath3 of batse bursts have @xmath4 positional contours nearly circular@xcite bursts with ipn arcs with larger fluences assume sky flat total error in batse burst position not large ipn arcs have zero width largest batse @xmath5 among bursts with ipn arcs characteristic width of 3-@xmath6 contours of ipn arcs is few arcminutes less than smallest batse @xmath7 figure 1 configurations burst known position left single ipn arc right diagram likelihood function bursts known positions two arcs by @xmath8 single ipn arcs @xmath9 @xmath10 deviation batse position from known position @xmath11 perpendicular deviation ipn arc @xmath12 likelihood function @xmath13 allows exploration model for @xmath0 focus on three models @xmath0 constant @xmath14 @xmath15 3 @xmath16 first model one free parameter @xmath0 second third two free parameters scale factor @xmath17 power law index @xmath18 fitting constant @xmath0 model to 18 batse 3b bursts with ipn positions maximum likelihood value @xmath19 consistent with value @xmath20 batse 3b catalog found using these bursts shown probability distribution in @xmath0 figure 2 comparison expected observed distribution normalized deviations @xmath22 assuming @xmath2 figure 3 figure 4 upper left panels 1-@xmath6 2-@xmath6 3-@xmath6 contours in @xmath23)-plane for burst samples data assuming @xmath1-dependent modelleft panel figure 2 @xmath24-dependent model fitting third model @xmath29 find ml values @xmath30 @xmath31 figure 4 probability @xmath32 data prefer power - law model over ml model constant @xmath33 results imply @xmath0 correlated with @xmath34 @xmath1 @xmath35 @xmath36 illustrated figure 5 ml @xmath34-dependent @xmath24-dependent models left ml @xmath34-dependent model right panel ml @xmath1-dependent model points data points ml constant @xmath0 model interval @xmath34 or @xmath1 examine character @xmath0 3b catalog 1b sample bursts evidence repeating fitting three models old 1b positions find @xmath37 ml constant @xmath0 model data request complicated model figures 3 4 fitting 3b positions 1b sample bursts data request @xmath1-dependent model 95% confidence level @xmath38 figures results imply 1b sample bursts new 3b @xmath0 s smaller than old bursts @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath42 80% bursts lower fluences larger @xmath1 s imply new @xmath0 s larger than oldgrateful to kevin hurley 3rd catalog ipn arcs analysis possible thank geoff pendleton michael briggs discussing batse burst location issues
| 0.258308
| 1,393
| 740
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,169
|
it is shown that 5d kaluza - klein theory stabilized by an external bulk scalar field may solve the discrepant laboratory g measurements .
this is achieved by an effective coupling between gravitation and the geomagnetic field .
experimental considerations are also addressed .
|
although the methods and techniques have been greatly improved since the late nineteenth century , the precision on the measurement of the gravitational constant , g , is still the less accurate in comparison with the other fundamental constants of nature @xcite .
moreover , given the relative uncertainties of most of the individual experiments ( reaching about @xmath0 for the most precise measurements ) , they show an incompatibility which leads to an overall precision of only about 1 part in @xmath1 .
thus the current status of the @xmath2 terrestrial measurements ( see @xcite ) implies either an unknown source of errors ( not taken into account in the published uncertainties ) , or some new physics @xcite . in the latter spirit
, many theories which include extradimensions have been proposed as candidates for the unification of physics . as such
, they involve a coupling between gravitation and electromagnetism ( ge coupling ) , as well as with other gauge fields present .
+ here we show that the discrepancy between the present results of the g - measurements may be understood as a consequence of the ge coupling .
also , this theory predicts a variation of the effective fine structure `` constant '' @xmath3 with the gravitational field , and thus with the cosmological time ( see @xcite ) .
an argument initially from landau and lifshitz @xcite may be applied to the pure kaluza - klein ( kk ) action ( see @xcite ) : the negative sign of the kinetic term of the five dimensional ( 5d ) kk internal scalar field , @xmath4 , leads to inescapable instability . the question to know which of the two conformally related frames ( einstein - pauli frame or jordan - fierz frame ) is the best remains debated in the literature , each frame having its own advantage .
the negative kinetic energy density for the @xmath4-field , and thus the instability , occur in both frames . in the following ,
we perform calculations in the jordan - fierz frame , where , as we show , the discrepant laboratory measurements of g find a natural explanation .
also , it is true that the 5d kk theory may yield a zero kinetic term ( and thus a zero kinetic energy density , which would also be unusual in 4d ) , but this occurs only when the electromagnetic ( em ) field is identically zero everywhere .
this may be relevant for some cosmological solutions , but not for our discussion .
on the contrary , we argue here that the @xmath4-field is tightly related to the em field via the link between the compactified space of the fifth dimension and the u(1 ) gauge group .
since stabilization may be obtained if an external field is present , we assume here a version , kk@xmath5 , which includes an external bulk scalar field minimally coupled to gravity ( like the radion in the brane world scenario ) .
after dimensional reduction ( @xmath6 ) , this bulk field reduces to a four dimensional scalar field @xmath7 and , in the jordan - fierz frame , the low energy effective action takes the form ( up to a total divergence ) @xmath8 \,d^{4}x\ ] ] @xmath9 \,d^{4}x,\ ] ] where @xmath10 is the potential 4-vector of the em field , @xmath11 the em field strength tensor , @xmath12 the self - interaction potential of @xmath5 of the symmetry breaking type and @xmath13 its source term .
the source term of the @xmath5-field , @xmath13 , includes the contributions of the ordinary matter , of the em field and of the internal scalar field @xmath4 . for each
, the coupling is defined by a function ( temperature dependent , as for the potential @xmath12 ) @xmath14 , where the subscript @xmath15 stands for `` matter '' , `` em '' and `` @xmath4 '' .
in addition , the necessity to recover the einstein - maxwell equations in the weak fields limit , implies the following conditions : @xmath16 and @xmath17 , where @xmath18 denotes the vacuum expectation value ( vev ) of the @xmath5-field .
the contributions of matter and @xmath4 are proportional to the traces of their respective energy - momentum tensors .
a contribution of the form @xmath19 accounts for the coupling with the em field . besides ,
though the fit to the data involves @xmath20 , we may infer that @xmath21 is negligibly small at very high temperature ( _ e.g. _ , like in the core of the sun or at the big bang nucleosynthesis ) and even vanishes beyond the critical temperature ( say @xmath22 k ) of the potential @xmath23 as one gets @xmath24 in that case .
following lichnerowicz @xcite , let us interpret the quantity @xmath25 of the einstein - hilbert term , and the factor @xmath26 $ ] of the maxwell term respectively as the effective gravitational `` constant '' and the effective vacuum dielectric permittivity .
the effective vacuum magnetic permeability reads @xmath27^{-1}$ ] , so that the velocity of light in vacuum remains a true universal constant .
both terms depend on the local ( for local physics ) or global ( at cosmological scale ) value of the kk scalar field @xmath4 , assumed to be positive defined .
the least action principle applied to the action ( [ kk action and psi j - f frame ] ) yields the generalized einstein - maxwell equations and the scalar fields equations @xmath28 and @xmath29
let us study the _ spatial _ variation of @xmath4 in the weak fields conditions out of the fields source , but in presence of a static dipolar magnetic field , @xmath30 .
we denote @xmath31 , @xmath32 and @xmath33 respectively the radius from the centre , the azimuth angle and the colatitude .
thus , writing @xmath34 , and taking into account that @xmath35 ( definition of the vev ) , equation ( [ kk scalar eq ] ) simplifies after linearization as @xmath36 \ , ( \,\vec{\nabla } v \,)^{2}.\ ] ] since @xmath37 and @xmath38 identically , the solution of equation ( [ stabilized kk scalar eq stat .
approx ] ) above reads merely @xmath39 \,v^{2}.\ ] ] for our purpose , it is sufficient to limit the expansion of the scalar potential , @xmath40 , to the terms of the legendre function of degree one ( @xmath41 ) and order one ( @xmath42 ) . hence @xmath43 $ ] , where @xmath44 , @xmath45 and @xmath46 are the relevant gauss coefficients , @xmath47 is the earth s radius and @xmath48 denotes its magnetic moment . setting @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 , the solution of equation ( [ stabilized kk scalar eq stat .
approx ] ) then reads ( and similarly for @xmath5 by making the substitution @xmath52 ) @xmath53 where we have set @xmath54 thence , one derives the expression of @xmath55 by inserting the solution ( [ stabilized kk scalar sol .
1st approx ] ) above in relation ( [ g eff ] ) .
it is worth noticing that the magnetic potential , @xmath40 , scales as @xmath56 , where @xmath57 is the magnitude of the geomagnetic field at radius @xmath31 . indeed , because of this scaling effect , the small spatial variations of the geomagnetic field will influence significantly the laboratory measurements of g whereas the large local magnetic fields present in the laboratory ( _ e .
g. _ , the magnetic suspension used to support the balance beam , the magnetic damper , etc ... ) will not .
a rough estimate shows that , even using a 30 tesla superconducting magnet , one still needs to gain at least one order of magnitude with the most precise g measuring apparatus avalaible yet .
hence , our prediction is consistent with the earlier conclusion of lloyd @xcite .
there are presently almost 45 results of g measurements published since 1942 @xcite .
because of the too numerous uncontrolled systematic biases , the mine measurements are excluded from the present study ( including them will not change our fit because of their lack of precision , typically less than @xmath58 ) . also , the more discordant laboratory measurement ( high ptb value @xcite ) is excluded , since it may suffer from a systematic effect .
the `` official '' values are presently @xmath59 ( codata 86 , @xcite ) and @xmath60 ( codata 2000 , @xcite ) in mks unit .
in the following , all the measurements are weighted equally in the fit .
fitting the 44 data with these values gives respectively @xmath61 and @xmath62 ( @xmath63 per degrees of freedom ) .
if we forget the official values and try a best fit , assuming an arbitrary constant value of @xmath2 , we obtain @xmath64 with @xmath65 .
the fit to the same sample of 44 measurements ( figure 1 ) , on account of the ge coupling , yields ( in mks units ) with @xmath66 : @xmath67 from the above fit , one derives both estimates of the true gravitational constant @xmath68 and the coupling parameter @xmath69 the latter quantity , expressed in the canonical form @xmath70 , yields a 5d planck scale @xmath71 tev of the order of the value that is invoked in the literature to solve the hierarchy problem . [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] + + table 2 : reduced @xmath72 for the two different hypothesis h0 ( hypothesis of a constant @xmath2 ) and h1 ( hypothesis of an effective g ) , and different samples s1 and whole ( except the high ptb value @xcite , see text ) .
+ considering the whole sample , we check the relevance of our result under h1 compared to the best value of @xmath2 under h0 , by applying the f test ( fisher law ) .
this yields @xmath73 , which indicates that , independently of the number of parameters ( two instead of one ) , our fit is better with a significance level greater than @xmath74 @xcite . let us emphasize that the most precise value of g today @xcite contributes to @xmath75 to less than @xmath76 in the above fit . likewise , the last published value of g @xcite would contribute to less than @xmath77 .
this suggests that the agreement may be better than purely indicated by the @xmath78 values .
moreover , if one substitutes @xmath79
@xcite announced by the msl team in june 2002 ( cpem , ottawa , canada ) for the prior @xmath80 published in 1999 @xcite , one would obtain with the sample s1 : h0 : @xmath81 h1 : @xmath82 and with the whole sample of 44 measurements : h0 : @xmath83 h1 : @xmath84
it is worth noticing that the scalar fields under considerations identify neither to the dilaton nor to the inflaton of higher dimensional theories , without further assumptions . in particular
, the computation of both scalar fields , as given by equations ( [ ext . scalar field eq ] ) and ( [ kk scalar eq ] ) , involves only ( see the right hand sides ) quantities related to fields sources , and not to the test bodies .
hence , the effective @xmath85 given by relation ( [ g eff ] ) does not depend on the composition of the test bodies .
besides , let us emphasize that the equation of motion of a neutral point - like particle in the genuine kk theory reduces to the 4d geodesic equation after dimensional reduction @xcite , although the kk scalar field is coupled to the maxwell invariant @xmath86 . in a forthcoming paper @xcite , we address the effect of the varying effective coupling constants on the masses of composit particles . on account of the higgs mechanism of quarks and leptons masses generation , by promoting the yukawa coupling constants to effective parameters ( on an equal footing with @xmath2 or @xmath3 ) that depend on both scalar fields @xmath5 and @xmath4 , we prove that the kk@xmath5 model is actually consistent with the current experimental bounds on the violation of the equivalence principle . hence , we conclude that present laboratory experiments may not measure a true constant of gravitation . instead , in addition to all other possible biases ( _ e .
anelasticity in the wire of torsion pendulum as pointed out by kuroda @xcite , and which since has been generically taken into account in the experiments ) , they may be pointing out an effective one depending on the geomagnetic field at the laboratory position .
j. renner , in _ determination of gravity constant and measurement of certain fine gravity effects _ , y. d. boulanger and m. u. sagitov ( eds . ) , ( national aeronautics and space administration , washington , 1974 ) , pp .
26 - 31 .
g. mller _
et al . _ , ( 1990 ) , geophys . j. int .
* 101 * , 329 ; m. a. zumberge _
et al . _ , ( 1991 ) , phys . rev .
lett . * 67 * , 3051 ; m. oldham , f. j. lowes and r. j. edge , ( 1993 ) , geophys .
* 113 * , 83 ; j. k. hoskins _ et al . _ ,
( 1985 ) , phys . rev .
* d32 * , 3084 ; y. t. chen _
et al . _ , ( 1984 ) , proc .
a394 * , 47 ; r. d. rose _ et al .
_ , ( 1969 ) , phys .
* 23 * , 655 ; g. i. moore _
_ , ( 1988 ) , phys . rev .
* d38 * , 1023 ; f. d. stacey _ et al .
_ , ( 1987 ) , rev .
mod . phys . * 59 * , 157 ; x. yang _
_ , ( 1991 ) , chinese phys .
* 8 * , 329 ; m. s. saulnier and d. frisch , ( 1989 ) , am . j. phys . ,
* 57 * , 417 ; g. j. tuck _ et al .
_ , in _ the fith marcel grossmann meeting _ , d. g. blair and m. j. buckingham ( eds . ) , ( world scientific , singapore , 1989 ) , pp
. 1605 - 1612 ; k. kuroda and h. hirakawa , ( 1985 ) , phys .
* d32 * , 342 .
|
methods techniques improved since late nineteenth century precision on gravitational constant g less accurate with other fundamental constants nature relative uncertainties of individual experiments @xmath0 for show incompatibility leads to overall precision of about 1 part in @xmath1 current status of @xmath2 terrestrial measurements implies unknown source errors or new physics theories extradimensions proposed as candidates for unification of physics involve coupling between gravitation electromagnetism ge coupling other gauge fields discrepancy between present results g - measurements may consequence of ge coupling theory predicts variation of effective fine structure constant @xmath3 with gravitational field cosmological time argument from landau and lifshitz applied to pure kaluza - klein ( ) action negative sign of kinetic term of five dimensional kk internal scalar field leads to instability question of two related frames einstein - pauli or jordan - fierz frame best debated each frame own advantage negative kinetic energy density for @xmath4-field instability occur in both framesperform calculations in jordan - fierz frame discrepant laboratory measurements of g find natural explanation 5d kk theory zero kinetic term zero kinetic energy density unusual in 4d when electromagnetic em ) field zero everywhere relevant for some cosmological solutions not our discussion @xmath4-field related to em field via link between compactified space fifth dimension u(1 ) gauge group stabilization if external field present assume version kk@xmath5 includes external bulk scalar field coupled to gravity brane world scenario after dimensional reduction bulk field reduces to four dimensional scalar field @xmath7 jordan - fierz frame low energy effective action @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 potential 4-vector of em field @xmath11 em field strength tensor @xmath12 self - interaction potential @xmath5 symmetry breaking type @xmath13 source term source term @xmath5-field includes contributions ordinary matter em field internal scalar field @xmath4 coupling defined by function temperature dependent @xmath14 subscript @xmath15 stands for matter em @xmath4 ''necessity to recover einstein - maxwell equations in weak fields limit implies conditions : @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 vacuum expectation value of @xmath5-field contributions of matter @xmath4 proportional to energy - momentum tensors contribution form @xmath19 coupling with em field fit data involves @xmath20 @xmath21 small at high temperature bang vanishes beyond critical temperature @xmath22 of potential @xmath23 @xmath24 interpret quantity @xmath25 einstein - hilbert factor @xmath26 maxwell as effective gravitational constant vacuum dielectric permittivity effective vacuum magnetic permeability reads @xmath27^{-1}$ ] velocity of light in vacuum remains universal constant terms depend on local or global value of kk scalar field @xmath4 positive least action principle yields generalized einstein - maxwell equations scalar fields equations @xmath28 and @xmath29 study spatial variation of @xmath4 in weak fields conditions static dipolar magnetic field @xmath30 denote @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 radius from centre azimuth angle colatitude .writing @xmath34 @xmath35 definition vev equation kk scalar eq simplifies after linearization as @xmath36^{2}. @xmath37 @xmath38 solution equation stabilized kk scalar eq stat approx reads @xmath39 \,v^{2}. limit expansion scalar potential @xmath40 to legendre function degree one @xmath41 order one @xmath42 ) @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 gauss coefficients @xmath47 earth s radius @xmath48 magnetic moment setting @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 solution equation stabilized kk scalar eq stat . approx reads @xmath5 substitution @xmath52 ) @xmath53 @xmath54 derives expression @xmath55 inserting solution stabilized kk scalar sol . 1st approx relation [ g eff ] magnetic potential @xmath40 scales as @xmath56 @xmath57 magnitude geomagnetic field at radius @xmath31 small spatial variations geomagnetic field influence laboratory measurements large local magnetic fields laboratorymagnetic suspension balance beam magnetic damper not estimate shows using 30 tesla superconducting magnet needs gain one order of magnitude with precise g measuring apparatus prediction consistent with conclusion lloyd @xcite almost 45 results of g measurements since 1942 numerous systematic biases mine measurements excluded from study change fit lack of precision less than @xmath58 discordant laboratory measurement ( high ptb value @xcite excluded systematic effect official values are @xmath59 and @xmath60 in mks unit measurements weighted equally in fitting 44 data with values gives @xmath61 and @xmath62 @xmath63 per degrees of freedom forget official values best fit arbitrary constant value @xmath2 obtain @xmath64 with @xmath65 fit to sample of 44 measurements figure 1 yields in mks units with @xmath66 : @xmath67 derives estimates of true gravitational constant @xmath68 and coupling parameter @xmath69 latter quantity @xmath70 yields 5d planck scale @xmath71 value hierarchy problemcols="^,^",options="header " table 2 : reduced @xmath72 two hypothesis h0 constant @xmath2 and h1 effective g different samples s1 and whole except high ptb value @xcite check relevance result under h1 best value @xmath2 under h0 applying f test fisher law yields @xmath73 indicates independently fit better with significance level greater than @xmath74 @xcite most precise value of g today @xcite contributes to @xmath75 less than @xmath76 last published value of g @xcite to less than @xmath77 agreement better than @xmath78 values substitutes @xmath79 @xcite team june 2002 for prior @xmath80 published 1999 @xcite sample s1 : h0 : @xmath81 h1 : @xmath82 whole sample of 44 measurements : h0 : @xmath83 h1 : @xmath84 scalar fields under identify neither to dilaton nor inflaton of higher dimensional theories computation of scalar fields equations involves quantities related to fields sources not test bodieseffective @xmath85 relation depend on composition test bodies equation of motion of neutral point particle in kk theory reduces to 4d geodesic equation after dimensional reduction @xcite kk scalar field coupled to maxwell invariant @xmath86 paper address effect varying effective coupling constants on masses composit particles promoting yukawa coupling constants to effective parameters scalar fields @xmath5 and @xmath4 kk@xmath5 model consistent with current experimental bounds equivalence principle laboratory experiments may not measure true constant of gravitation anelasticity in wire of torsion pendulum may effective one on geomagnetic field laboratory position j. renner determination of gravity constant measurement fine gravity effects y d. boulanger m u. sagitov national aeronautics space administration washington 1974 pp . 26 - 31 g. mller et al . 1990 ) geophys . j. int . * 101 * , 329 ; m a. zumberge 1991 ) phys . rev . lett . * 67 * , 3051 ; m. oldham flowes r j. edge 1993 ) geophys . 113, 83 k hoskins 1985 ) phys . rev . d32 3084 chen 1984 ) proc a394 47 r d. rose 1969 ) phys . 23 655 g i. moore 1988 ) . rev . d38 1023 f stacey 1987 ) rev . mod . 59 , 157 x yang 1991 ) chinese phys . * 8 * , 329 saulnier d. frisch 1989 ) phys . 57, 417 g. j. tuck fith marcel grossmann meeting d g. blair j buckingham world scientific singapore 1989 pp 1605 - 1612 k kuroda. hirakawa 1985 ) phys . d32, 342
| 0.512292
| 3,268
| 1,702
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,175
|
we propose to use phonon absorption spectroscopy to study many - body gaps and phases of two - subband heterostructures in the quantum hall regime . implications of the spin - orbit interaction for phonon absorption in this system are considered .
phonon spectroscopy is a powerful experimental technique that has been successfully used in the study of the properties of a two - dimensional ( 2d ) electron gas in the quantum hall regime [ 1 ] .
it allows probing of the states with non - zero momentum , which are not accessible by either cyclotron resonance or photoluminescence methods .
we propose to use acoustic - phonon spectroscopy to study many - body effects in a two - subband quasi-2d system , formed at a single semiconductor heterojunction and subjected to a quantizing magnetic field .
we show that the formation of many - body gaps and the existence of different spin phases in this system result in a striking difference in the magnetic field dependence of the phonon absorption rate at different filling factors
. acoustic - phonon scattering of 2d electrons in a quantizing magnetic field is strongly suppressed due to the dispersionless structure of the landau levels ( lls ) . in a two - subband system , however , a sharp enhancement of the electron - phonon interaction occurs when the two lls corresponding to different size - quantization subbands ( we consider the second ll of the first subband and the first ll of the second subband only ) approach one another , and the separation between these energy levels , @xmath0 , becomes close to @xmath1 . here
@xmath2 is the cyclotron energy , @xmath3 is the intersubband splitting , @xmath4 is the velocity of sound and @xmath5 is the magnetic length .
this electron - phonon interaction enhancement should manifest itself in the magnetic field dependence of the phonon absorption rate and dissipative conductivity . at filling factor slightly greater than two ,
when the electron - electron interaction between the particles belonging to either of the intersecting lls can be neglected , a double - peak structure in the magnetic field dependence of the phonon - mediated transport properties of the two - subband system has been predicted [ 2 ] . with increasing electron density , the repulsion between the levels due to electron - electron exchange interactions opens a gap in the interlevel excitation spectra . at filling factor @xmath6
this gap exists at all values of the bare level splitting @xmath7 and can well exceed @xmath1 . as a result , the double - peak structure transforms into a single - peak one ( see figure 1 ) . by far the most interesting case is when the electron filling factor @xmath8 . when the cyclotron energy is close to the intersubband splitting the system can be mapped onto a four - level electron system with an effective filling factor @xmath9 .
the ground state is either a ferromagnetic state or a spin - singlet state , depending on the values of the interlevel splitting and zeeman energy @xmath10 .
the electron - electron interaction renormalizes the phase boundaries , which results in the existence of a ferromagnetic phase even for @xmath11 .
the excitation spectrum has a gap for any value of the interlevel splitting @xmath7 and zeeman splitting @xmath10 .
this results in strong suppression of the electron - phonon interaction .
the rate of phonon absorption by the considered quasi-2d electron system at @xmath8 again has a double - peak structure as a function of level splitting and a steplike structure as a function of zeeman splitting ( see figure 2 ) . in the absence of the spin - orbit interaction ,
the transitions between levels with different spin indices are forbidden because the electron - phonon interaction conserves the electron spin .
the spin - orbit interaction allows such transitions .
matrix elements of the spin - orbit interaction hamiltonian @xmath12 between levels differing by subband number , ll number , and spin projection on the normal to the structure plane , are given by following expressions [ 3 ] : @xmath13 where @xmath14 \right ) \cdot \mathbf{s}$ ] , @xmath15 $ ] , @xmath16 and @xmath17 numerate subbands , @xmath18 is the ll number , and @xmath19 and @xmath20 are phenomenological spin - orbit constants of the semiconductor [ 4 ] .
the expressions for @xmath21 and @xmath22 are given by @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the quantum - well confinement potential .
these matrix elements cause an admixture of states with opposite spin direction to both the initial and final states for the phonon absorption . as a result ,
the phonon absorption rate at @xmath8 never becomes zero ; in the region between peaks , it is of the order of @xmath25 times its value at the peak of absorption , where @xmath26 is the corresponding matrix element of the spin - orbit interaction ( eq.(1 ) ) , and @xmath27 is the many - body energy gap . in the absence of many - body effects , the inter - subband spin - orbit coupling results in anticrossing of levels with different spin , subband and ll indices .
the resulting energy gaps can be measured by high - resolution spectroscopic techniques ( optical or spin / cyclotron resonance spectroscopy ) , as has been suggested for one - subband systems in tilted magnetic fields [ 5 ] .
this work was supported by the uk epsrc .
|
9 u. zeitler , a.m. devitt , j.e .
digby , c.j .
mellor , a.j .
kent , k.a .
benedict , and t. cheng , phys .
lett . * 82 * , 5333 ( 1999 ) , and references therein .
v.m . apalkov and m.e .
portnoi , physica e * 12 * , 470 ( 2002 ) .
k.v . kavokin and m.e .
portnoi , to be published .
g.l . bir and g.e .
pikus , _ symmetry and strain - induced effects in semiconductors _
( wiley , new york , 1974 ) .
falko , phys .
b * 46 * , 4320 ( 1992 ) . , as a function of bare level separation , @xmath28 , at filling factor @xmath29 ( solid and dotted lines ) and for the case of non - interacting electrons ( dashed line ) .
the results for @xmath29 are shown for two different values of the fang - howard parameter ( inverse quantum well width ) @xmath30 and @xmath31 in units of inverse magnetic length @xmath32 .
the absorption rate @xmath33 is in units of @xmath34 ; @xmath35 is in coulomb units ( @xmath36).,width=510 ] at filling factor @xmath37 as a function of interlevel separation @xmath38 for the case of zero zeeman splitting , @xmath39 , for three values of parameter @xmath40 .
the data for @xmath41 1.0 and 1.5 are multiplied by 10 .
the absorption rate @xmath33 is in units of @xmath34 ; @xmath38 is in units of @xmath42.,width=510 ]
|
zeitler devitt digby mellor kent benedict cheng . lett 82 5333 ( 1999 ) references apalkov portnoi physica 12 470 ( 2002 ) kavokin portnoi published bir pikus symmetry strain - induced effects semiconductors wiley new york 1974 ) falko. 46 4320 ( 1992 ) function bare level separation @xmath28 filling factor @xmath29 solid lines non - interacting electrons results @xmath29 fang - howard parameter inverse quantum well width @xmath30 @xmath31 inverse magnetic length @xmath32 absorption rate @xmath33 units @xmath34 @xmath35 coulomb units filling factor @xmath37 function interlevel separation @xmath38 zero zeeman splitting @xmath39 three values parameter @xmath40 data @xmath41 1.0 1.5 multiplied by 10 absorption rate @xmath33 units @xmath34 @xmath38 @xmath42
| 0.073485
| 414
| 220
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,177
|
we have performed a new model independent amplitude analysis of reaction @xmath0 measured at cern at 17.2 gev / c on polarized target .
the analysis extends the range of dipion mass from 600880 mev used in the previous study to 5801080 mev .
our purpose is to study the role of @xmath1 interference and to better determine the resonance parameters of @xmath2 resonance from fits to both @xmath3-wave amplitudes @xmath4 and @xmath5 with recoil nucleon transversities `` up '' and `` down '' , respectively .
this work is the first attempt to determine resonance parameters of a resonance from breit - wigner fits to production amplitudes of opposite transversity .
we used several fitting procedures to understand the resonant structure of the @xmath3-wave amplitudes in this mass range .
first we performed separate fits to @xmath4 and @xmath5 using a breit - wigner parametrization for @xmath2 and @xmath1 , and a constant coherent background .
we obtained an excellent fit to the data with a low @xmath6 per data point @xmath7 . however the width of @xmath8 is narrow 11076 mev in @xmath4 while it is broad 217233 mev in @xmath5 .
to decide whether the apparent dependence of @xmath9 on nucleon spin is a real physical effect or an artifact of separate fits , we performed simultaneous fits to @xmath4 and @xmath5 .
first we assumed a common single @xmath8 pole .
we found a good fit with @xmath10 mev , @xmath11 mev but the @xmath12 is larger than @xmath12 from separate fits .
we concluded that the results of separate fits may indicate existence of two @xmath8 poles , one with a narrow and the other with a broad width .
self - consistency requires that both poles contribute to both @xmath3-wave amplitudes .
the simultaneous fit to @xmath4 and @xmath5 with two common @xmath8 poles yields an excellent fit with a lower @xmath12 than the separate fits .
all amplitudes are dominated by a @xmath8 state with @xmath13 mev and @xmath14 mev .
all amplitudes receive a weaker contribution from a narrower @xmath15 state with @xmath16 mev and @xmath17 mev .
we propose to identify @xmath18 and @xmath19 with colour - electric and colour - magnetic modes of lowest mass scalar gluonium @xmath20 .
|
in 1978 , lutz and rybicki showed@xcite that almost complete amplitude analysis of reactions @xmath21 and @xmath22 is possible from measurements in a single experiment on a transversely polarized target .
more recently it was shown@xcite that amplitude analyses of reactions @xmath23 and @xmath24 are also possible from measurements on transversely polarized target .
the work of lutz and rybicki opened a whole new approach to hadron spectroscopy by enabling to study the production of resonances on the level of spin amplitudes rather than spin - averaged cross - sections . in amplitude analyses of these reactions resonances
are observed in mass distribution of recoil nucleon transversity amplitudes @xmath25 and @xmath26 corresponding to recoil nucleon spin `` up '' or `` down '' relative to the scattering plane . in traditional hadron spectroscopy ,
the nucleon spin is irrelevant and resonance should appear in both spin amplitudes with the same mass , with the same width and with similar mass distributions .
the measurements of reactions @xmath0 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 at cern on polarized targets seem to challenge these expectations .
these cern experiments reveal shapes of resonant mass distributions in amplitudes of opposite transversity that are different and dependent significantly on the nucleon spin@xcite .
an important advantage of amplitude analyses is that new resonances can be detected on the level of spin amplitude that are not visible in the spin - averaged measurements on unpolarized targets .
such is the case of the new scalar resonance @xmath2 found in amplitude analyses of reactions @xmath29 at 17.2 gev / c at low momentum transfers @xmath30 0.0050.2 ( gev / c)@xmath31 and in @xmath32 at 5.98 and 11.85 gev / c at larger momentum transfers @xmath33 0.20.4 ( gev / c)@xmath31@xcite .
using monte carlo method of amplitude analysis , it was found in @xcite that in @xmath34 reaction both solutions for spin `` up '' @xmath3-wave amplitude @xmath4 resonate below 880 mev while both solutions for spin `` down '' @xmath3-wave amplitude @xmath5 appeared nonresonating .
this result is in perfect agreement with @xmath6 minimization method of amplitude analysis used in @xcite ( see fig . 1 and 2 of @xcite ) .
detailed quantitative breit - wigner fits to @xmath4 in @xcite showed the importance of coherent background for determination of the resonance parameters of @xmath2 .
the best fit in @xcite gives @xmath35 mev and @xmath36 mev .
the excellent agreement of these values for @xmath37 and @xmath9 with the ellis - lanik theorem@xcite strongly suggests that @xmath2 is the lowest mass scalar gluonium@xcite .
trnqvist expressed concern@xcite that the low mass and the narrow width of @xmath2 is due to the neglect of interference of @xmath2 with @xmath38 ( 980 ) in our breit - wigner fits which initially extended only to 880 mev in dipion mass using the data set of ref .
the apparent nonresonating behaviour of the amplitude @xmath5 below 880 mev was also puzzling .
to investigate these questions we have performed a new amplitude analysis of @xmath39 reaction at 17.2 gev / c and small momentum transfers @xmath330.0050.20 ( gev / c)@xmath31 extending the dipion mass range up to 1080 mev using the data set of ref . [ 7 ] . in this report
we present the results of our detailed study of resonant structure of @xmath3-wave amplitudes @xmath4 and @xmath5 in the mass region of 5801080 mev .
this work is the first attempt to determine resonance parameters of a resonance from fits to production amplitudes of opposite nucleon transversity .
all previous determinations of resonance parameters used spin - averaged mass distributions or , in the case of ref . [ 18 ] , only one spin amplitude @xmath40 .
the new results for @xmath4 shows a narrow resonance below 880 mev , followed by an enhancement above 900 mev and a dramatic dip at @xmath411000 mev corresponding to @xmath1 .
the amplitude @xmath5 shows a broader structure with a dip at @xmath411000 mev .
first we performed separate fits to @xmath4 and @xmath42 using a coherent sum of @xmath2 and @xmath1 breit - wigner amplitudes and constant background .
we find that @xmath8 contributes to both amplitudes but with different widths .
solutions 1 and 2 of amplitude @xmath4 have a narrow width of 100 and 76 mev , respectively .
solutions 1 and 2 of amplitude @xmath5 have a broader width of 217 and 233 mev . the interference with @xmath1 is crucial in reproducing the enhancements above 900 mev and the dip at 1010 mev . the narrow width in the spin `` up '' amplitude @xmath43 and the broad width in the spin `` down '' amplitude @xmath5 is inconsistent with the traditional view of a resonace as a particle with single mass and width . to see
if we can describe the mass spectra of @xmath4 and @xmath5 with a single @xmath8 with the same resonance parameters , we have performed a simultaneous fit to @xmath43 and @xmath5 hoping that the differences in the resonant shapes can be accounted for by differences in the background .
we obtained an acceptable fit but the @xmath6 per data point @xmath7 was significantly higher than @xmath12 in separate fits .
we thus obtained a poorer fit .
our next step was to admit that a narrow @xmath8 contributes to @xmath4 and a broad @xmath8 contributes to @xmath5 .
but a self - consistency requires that the narrow @xmath8 contributes also to @xmath5 , and the broad @xmath8 contributes also to @xmath4 .
we expected these additional contributions to be small in a simultaneous two - pole fit to @xmath4 and @xmath5 .
the results of the fit were surprising .
our best fit had @xmath12 better than the separate fits to @xmath4 and @xmath5 . and the fit required in all amplitudes the presence of two @xmath8 resonances : higher mass and broader @xmath8 with average mass @xmath44 mev and @xmath45 , and a lower mass and narrower @xmath15 with average mass of @xmath16 mev and @xmath46 mev . in
all @xmath3-wave amplitudes the higher mass @xmath8 dominates the @xmath15 contribution .
since this solution gives a very low @xmath12 , it must be taken seriously .
we propose to identify the @xmath18 and @xmath19 as color electric and color magnetic modes of lowest mass scalar gluonium @xmath20 , respectively , following the gluonium classification scheme of bjorken@xcite elaborated in@xcite .
the paper is organized as follows . in section
ii we present and discuss the results of our new amplitude analysis . in section iii
we introduce the parametrization of unnormalized @xmath3-wave amplitudes with a single @xmath8 pole and present the results of separate fits to amplitudes @xmath4 and @xmath5 .
simultaneous fits to these @xmath3-wave amplitudes using a single @xmath8 pole are presented in section iv . in section
v we introduce the parametrization with two @xmath8 poles and discuss the results of simultaneous fits to @xmath4 and @xmath5 using this parametrization . in section vi we discuss the possible constituent nature of the two @xmath8 states @xmath18 and @xmath19 resulting from the best fit .
the paper closes with a summary in section vii .
the high statistics cern - munich measurement of @xmath47 at 17.2 gev / c on polarized target was reported in four data sets with kinematics given in the following table :
|
1978 lutz rybicki showed amplitude analysis reactions @xmath21 possible from transversely polarized target recently analyses reactions @xmath23 possible transversely polarized target opened new approach hadron spectroscopy production resonances spin amplitudes analyses resonances observed in mass distribution recoil nucleon transversity amplitudes @xmath25 @xmath26 spin traditional hadron spectroscopy nucleon spin irrelevant resonance both spin amplitudes same mass width similar distributions measurements reactions @xmath0 cern polarized targets challenge expectations reveal resonant mass distributions amplitudes opposite transversity different dependent on nucleon spin amplitude analyses new resonances detected spin amplitude not visible spin - averaged unpolarized targets new scalar resonance @xmath2 found in amplitude analyses reactions @xmath29 17.2 gev / c low momentum transfers @xmath30 0.0050.2 ( gev / c) @xmath32 5.98 11.85 gev / c larger momentum transfers 0.20.4 ( gev / c)monte carlo method amplitude analysis found @xcite @xmath34 reaction solutions spin up resonate below 880 mev down nonresonating with @xmath6 minimization method @xcite fig . 1 2 breit - wigner fits @xmath4 importance coherent background resonance parameters @xmath2 best fit gives @xmath35 mev @xmath36 mev agreement values @xmath37 @xmath9 with ellis - lanik theorem suggests @xmath2 lowest mass scalar gluonium concern low mass narrow width @xmath2 due to neglect interference @xmath2 with @xmath38 ( 980 ) breit - wigner fits 880 mev nonresonating behaviour amplitude @xmath5 below 880 mev puzzling new amplitude analysis @xmath39 reaction at 17.2 gev / c small momentum transfers extending dipion mass range up to 1080 mev report results study resonant structure @xmath3-wave amplitudes @xmath4 @xmath5 in mass region 5801080 mev first attempt determine resonance parameters fits production amplitudes opposite nucleon transversityprevious determinations resonance used spin - averaged mass distributions one spin amplitude @xmath40 new results for @xmath4 narrow resonance below 880 mev enhancement above 900 mev dip at @xmath411000 mev @xmath5 broader structure dip at @xmath411000 mev performed separate fits to @xmath4 @xmath42 using @xmath2 @xmath1 - amplitudes background @xmath8 contributes to both amplitudes different widths solutions 1 and 2 @xmath4 narrow width 100 76 mev broader width 217 233 mev interference with @xmath1 crucial enhancements above 900 mev dip at 1010 mev narrow width in @xmath43 broad width @xmath5 inconsistent with traditional view resonace single mass width @xmath4 @xmath5 single @xmath8 performed simultaneous fit to @xmath43 @xmath5 differences by background obtained acceptable fit @xmath6 per data point @xmath7 higher than @xmath12 obtained poorer fit narrow @xmath8 contributes to @xmath4 broad @xmath8 to @xmath5self - consistency requires narrow @xmath8 @xmath5 broad @xmath8 @xmath4 expected contributions small in simultaneous two - pole fit @xmath4 @xmath5 results surprising best fit had @xmath12 better than separate fits fit required two @xmath8 resonances higher mass broader @xmath8 average mass @xmath44 lower mass narrower @xmath15 @xmath3-wave amplitudes higher mass @xmath8 dominates @xmath15 solution gives low @xmath12 propose identify @xmath18 @xmath19 as color electric magnetic modes of lowest mass scalar gluonium @xmath20 following gluonium classification scheme bjorken@xcite paper organized section ii new amplitude analysis parametrization of unnormalized @xmath3-wave amplitudes with single @xmath8 pole results of separate fits to @xmath4 simultaneous fits single pole in section iv section v parametrization with two @xmath8 poles results simultaneous fits section vi possible constituent nature of two @xmath8 states @xmath18 from best fit paper closes summary in section viihigh statistics munich measurement @xmath47 17.2 gev c polarized target four data sets
| 0.30764
| 1,831
| 943
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,206
|
recent analysis of the helioseismic observations indicate that the previously observed surface torsional oscillations extend significantly downwards into the solar convection zone . in an attempt to understand these oscillations ,
we study the nonlinear coupling between the magnetic field and the solar differential rotation in the context of a mean field dynamo model , in which the nonlinearity is due to the action of the azimuthal component of the lorentz force of the dynamo generated magnetic field on the solar angular velocity .
the underlying zero order angular velocity is chosen to be consistent with the most recent helioseismic data .
the model produces butterfly diagrams which are in qualitative agreement with the observations .
it displays torsional oscillations that penetrate into the convection zone , and which with time migrate towards the equator .
the period of these oscillations is found to be half that of the period of the global magnetic fields .
this is compatible with the observed period of the surface torsional oscillations . inside the convection zone , this is a testable prediction that is not ruled out by the observations so far available .
|
an important feature of the solar convection zone is the presence of differential rotation in the form of a decrease in angular velocity from equator to the pole .
this has been observed both in the surface layers ( e.g. snodgrass 1984 ) and deeper in the convection zone , as inferred from helioseismic measurements ( e.g. thompson _ et al .
_ 1996 ) . furthermore
, the differential rotation on the surface has been observed to vary with time ( e.g. howard & labonte 1980 ; snodgrass , howard , & webster 1985 ) .
these so called torsional oscillations , which have periods of about 11 years , manifest themselves in the form of four alternating latitudinal bands of slightly faster and slower than average zonal flows which migrate towards the equator in about 22 years .
these oscillations have also been confirmed by the analysis of the helioseismic data from the solar and heliospheric observatory ( soho ) spacecraft for the present solar cycle ( kosovichev & schou 1997 ; schou _ et al .
_ 1998 ) . recent analysis of the helioseismic data , from both the michelson doppler imager ( mdi ) instrument on board the soho spacecraft and the global oscillation network group ( gong ) project , has also produced evidence that this banding signature is not merely a surface feature , but extends into the convection zone , to a depth of at least 8 percent in radius ( howe _ et al .
these authors present data on departures of the reconstructed rotation rate from its temporal averages - the residuals - as a function of latitude at several target depths , which behave in a manner similar to the migration of sunspots during the solar cycle ( the ` butterfly diagram ' ) .
this finding is also supported by the analysis of antia & basu ( 2000 ) , who use different data sets from gong and independent inversion techniques .
the time - base of these observations is only a few years , less than a complete solar cycle .
these torsional oscillations are thought to be produced as a consequence of the nonlinear interactions between the magnetic fields and the solar differential rotation .
a zero order ` mean ' differential rotation is assumed to be maintained by the reynolds stresses of the turbulence ; this can be included as a constant ` background ' angular velocity , or explicitly parametrized , e.g. by the so called @xmath0effect ( e.g. rdiger 1989 ) .
attempts have been made to explain the surface oscillations in terms of the effects of the lorentz force exerted by the large scale magnetic field on the azimuthal velocity field ( e.g. brandenburg & tuominen 1988 ) , or as a consequence of the ` quenching ' of the turbulence - dependent quantities by the magnetic field ( kitchatinov _ et al .
_ 1999 ) . here
we study this nonlinear coupling in the context of a two dimensional axisymmetric mean field dynamo model , in a spherical shell , in which the only nonlinearity is the action of the azimuthal component of the lorentz force of the dynamo generated magnetic field on the solar angular velocity . obtaining torsional oscillations in this way is also of interest in view of the fact that the lorentz force is of second order in the magnetic field , thus naturally leading to the excitation of hydrodynamical oscillations of about half the period of the magnetic oscillations . in the next section
we introduce our model . section 3 contains our results and section 4 gives a brief discussion .
here we shall assume that the gross features of the large scale solar magnetic field can be described by a mean field dynamo model , with the standard equation @xmath1 where @xmath2 , the term proportional to @xmath3 represents the effects of turbulent diamagnetism , and where the velocity field is taken to be of the form @xmath4 where @xmath5 , @xmath6 is a prescribed underlying rotation law and the component @xmath7 satisfies @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the operator @xmath10 and @xmath11 is the induction constant .
the assumption of axisymmetry allows the field @xmath12 to be split into toroidal and poloidal parts , @xmath13 , and results in eq .
( [ mfe ] ) yielding two scalar equations for @xmath14 and @xmath15 .
nondimensionalizing in terms of the solar radius @xmath16 and time @xmath17 , where @xmath18 is the maximum value of @xmath19 and letting @xmath20 , @xmath21 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath24 , results in a system of equations for @xmath25 and @xmath7 , with the dynamo parameters @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , and @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the solar surface equatorial angular velocity ( see moss & brooke 2000 for details ) . here
@xmath31 and @xmath18 are the turbulent magnetic diffusivity and viscosity respectively and @xmath32 is the turbulent prandtl number .
the density @xmath33 is assumed to be uniform , and stress free boundary conditions ensure angular momentum conservation .
these equations were solved using the code and boundary conditions described in moss & brooke ( 2000 ) , over the range @xmath34 , @xmath35 , with uniform spacing in both @xmath36 and @xmath37 .
the computational domain is the region @xmath38 ; with the solar convection zone proper being thought to occupy the region @xmath39 , the region @xmath40 can be thought of as an overshoot region / tachocline . in the following simulations we used a mesh resolution of 61 points
uniformly distributed radially and 101 points uniformly distributed latitudinally ( over @xmath41 ) , but test runs were carried out at higher spatial resolutions . in this investigation , we took @xmath6 to be given in @xmath42 by an interpolation on the mdi data obtained from 1996 to 1999 ( howe _ et al .
_ 2000 ) , depicted in fig . 1 .
for @xmath43 we took @xmath44 , where @xmath45 ( cf .
rdiger & brandenburg 1995 ) and @xmath46 with cubic interpolation to zero at @xmath47 and @xmath48 , with the convention that @xmath49 and @xmath50 . also , in order to take into account the likely decrease in the turbulent diffusion coefficient @xmath19 in the overshoot region , we allowed a simple linear decrease from @xmath51 at @xmath52 to @xmath53 in @xmath54 .
we monitor the time evolution of the total magnetic energy @xmath55 and the global parity of the magnetic field , defined as @xmath56 , where @xmath57 and @xmath14 refer respectively to the parts of the magnetic field that have symmetry or antisymmetry with respect to the equatorial plane ( see also brandenburg _ et al . _ 1989 ) .
thus @xmath58 and @xmath59 correspond to symmetric and antisymmetric fields respectively .
we calibrated our model so that near marginal excitation the cycle period was about 22 years .
this determined @xmath60 , corresponding to @xmath61 @xmath62s@xmath63 , given the known values of @xmath30 and @xmath16 .
the first solutions to be excited in the linear theory are odd parity ( @xmath64 ) limit cycles , which in this case have marginal dynamo number @xmath65 .
the even parity ( @xmath58 ) solutions are also excited at similar marginal dynamo numbers of @xmath66 .
we considered two values of the prandtl numbers , @xmath67 and @xmath68 .
# 1#20.5#1 with these parameter values , we found that this model , with underlying zero order angular velocity chosen to be consistent with the recent ( mdi ) helioseismic data ( fig .
[ mdi ] ) , is capable of producing butterfly diagrams which are in qualitative agreement with the observations .
an example of this is depicted in fig .
[ calph=-3.2.pr=1.0.mdi2.toroidal.butterfly ] .
the polar feature is rather too strong we have checked that this can be rectified by modifying slightly the spatial dependence of @xmath43 , by for example choosing @xmath69 .
# 1#20.42#1 we also found that this model successfully produced torsional oscillations in the convection zone , similar to those deduced from recent helioseismic data . to compare our model with these results ,
we have plotted in figs .
[ calph=-3.2.pr=0.1.mdi2.velocity ] and [ calph=-3.2.pr=1.0.mdi2.velocity ] the variations of the rotation rate with latitude and time ( ` butterfly diagrams ' ) to reveal the migrating banded zonal flows . in these models ,
the basic magnetic field parity is odd ( @xmath64 ) . #
1#20.42#1 # 1#20.42#1 # 1#20.42#1 # 1#20.42#1 for the sake of comparison with observational results , we have also plotted in fig . [ calph=-3.2.pr=1.0.mdi2.time.series.residuals ] the evolution of the residual rotation rate with time , at radius @xmath70 and latitude @xmath71 degrees .
1#20.40#1 as can be seen , consistent with the observations , in each hemisphere there are alternating latitudinal bands , with the width of approximately 10 degrees , of slightly faster and slower than average zonal flows .
these migrate towards the equator in about 22 years , and extend deep into the convection zone .
the amplitudes of these oscillations increase with depth below the surface and depend on the parameters of our model , in particular the prandtl number . for @xmath68 ,
these amplitudes range from about 0.07 nhz at the surface to more than @xmath72 nhz towards the bottom of the convection zone , somewhat lower than , but in principle compatible with , the results of howe _
the torsional oscillations present in our model have periods half that of the period of the global magnetic field which is compatible with the observed period of the oscillations at the surface and consistent with the observed behaviour inside the convection zone .
the strictly odd parity models presented have an equatorial feature in the ` butterfly diagrams ' for the velocity perturbations which does not appear to be present in the current inversions of the observational data . this becomes weaker as prandtl number increases .
we also note in passing that these figures are almost identical for cases where even parity solutions are found , except that this feature is then absent .
we further point out that the large scale solar magnetic field is probably of _ mixed _ global parity ( predominantly odd ) see , e.g. , pulkinnen _ et al . _
we have studied a solar dynamo model , calibrated to have the correct cycle period , with a mean rotation law given by recent helioseismic observations .
this model produces butterfly diagrams in qualitative agreements with those observed .
we have shown that a nonlinear coupling between the magnetic field and the solar differential rotation , where the nonlinearity is due to the action of the azimuthal component of the lorentz force , is capable of producing torsional oscillations , with period of about 11 years , which penetrate into the convection zone and which migrate towards the equator in about 22 years .
the period of these oscillations is about half that of the period of the global magnetic fields .
this is in agreement with the observed period of the torsional oscillations at the surface . for the oscillations inside the convection zone ,
this is a testable prediction , not contradicted by the current helioseismic observations , which so far extend over an interval less than a solar cycle .
we note also that solutions with even parity ( @xmath73 ) show slightly larger amplitudes without the equatorial feature .
the current inversions of the helioseismological data seem to suggest that the torsional oscillations largely disappear below about @xmath74 , in contrast to our model oscillations . however , there are uncertainties in these inversions , specially at the deeper levels . at the same time
our dynamical model is oversimplified and substantial improvements can be made .
in particular , the predicted amplitudes for torsional oscillations in our model are likely to be affected by our assumption of uniform density in eq .
( [ ns ] ) . nevertheless , we find it interesting that some of the major features in the torsional oscillations can be readily reproduced .
a more detailed study of these oscillations , including more realistic density profiles , is in progress .
we would like to thank rachel howe and mike thompson for many useful discussions regarding the helioseismic observations and for providing us with the data displayed in fig .
ec is supported by a pparc fellowship and rt benefited from pparc uk grant no .
|
feature solar convection zone is differential rotation decrease angular velocity from equator to pole observed in surface layers snodgrass 1984 and deeper in convection zone from helioseismic measurements thompson 1996 differential rotation on surface with time howard labonte 1980 1985 torsional oscillations 11 years manifest four alternating latitudinal bands of faster and slower zonal flows migrate towards equator in 22 years oscillations confirmed by analysis helioseismic data from solar heliospheric observatory spacecraft for present solar cycle kosovichev & schou 1997 schou 1998 recent analysis data from michelson doppler imager instrument global oscillation network group project evidence banding signature not extends into convection zone to 8 percent in radius ( howe _ et al data on departures reconstructed rotation rate from temporal averages as function of latitude at target depths similar to migration of sunspots during solar cycle butterfly diagram supported by analysis of antia & basu ( 2000 ) data sets inversion techniques time - base observations few years less than complete solar cycletorsional oscillations produced nonlinear interactions between magnetic fields solar differential rotation zero order mean differential rotation maintained by reynolds stresses turbulence constant background angular velocity or parametrized by @xmath0effect rdiger 1989 ) attempts to explain surface oscillations effects lorentz force large scale magnetic field on azimuthal velocity field brandenburg tuominen 1988 ) quenching turbulence - dependent quantities by magnetic field ( kitchatinov 1999 ) study nonlinear coupling two dimensional axisymmetric mean field dynamo model spherical shell only nonlinearity action azimuthal component lorentz force dynamo magnetic field on solar angular velocity obtaining torsional oscillations interest lorentz force second order in magnetic field to excitation hydrodynamical oscillations half period magnetic oscillations introduce model section 3 results section 4 discussionassume features large scale solar magnetic field described mean field dynamo model standard equation @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 effects turbulent diamagnetism velocity field form @xmath4 @xmath5 rotation law @xmath7 satisfies @xmath8 @xmath9 operator @xmath10 induction constant assumption axisymmetry allows field @xmath12 into toroidal poloidal parts two scalar equations for @xmath14 @xmath15 nondimensionalizing solar radius @xmath16 time @xmath17 @xmath18 maximum value @xmath19 @xmath20 system equations @xmath25 @xmath7 dynamo parameters @xmath26 @xmath29 @xmath30 solar surface equatorial angular velocity moss & brooke 2000 @xmath31 @xmath18 turbulent magnetic diffusivity viscosity @xmath32 turbulent prandtl number density @xmath33 uniform stress free boundary conditions ensure angular momentum conservation equations solved using code boundary conditions moss & brooke 2000 range @xmath34 @xmath35 uniform spacing @xmath36 @xmath37computational domain region @xmath38 solar convection zone region @xmath39 @xmath40 overshoot region / tachocline simulations used mesh resolution 61 points radially 101 points latitudinally over @xmath41 test runs higher spatial resolutions took @xmath6 @xmath42 interpolation mdi data 1996 to 1999 fig . 1 @xmath43 took @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 cubic interpolation to zero at @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 decrease turbulent diffusion coefficient @xmath19 overshoot region allowed linear decrease from @xmath51 @xmath52 to @xmath53 in @xmath54 monitor time evolution total magnetic energy @xmath55 global parity magnetic field @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath14 refer parts magnetic field symmetry or antisymmetry equatorial plane @xmath58 @xmath59 correspond to symmetric and antisymmetric fields calibrated model near marginal excitation cycle period 22 years determined @xmath60 to @xmath61 @xmath62s@xmath63 values of @xmath30 @xmath16first solutions excited linear theory are odd parity @xmath64 ) limit cycles marginal dynamo number @xmath65 even parity @xmath58 ) solutions excited at similar marginal dynamo numbers @xmath66 considered two prandtl numbers @xmath67 and @xmath68#20.5#1 model zero order angular velocity consistent with recent helioseismic data butterfly diagrams agreement with observations example depicted in fig . calph=-3.2.pr=1.0.mdi2.toroidal.butterfly ] polar feature strong rectified by modifying spatial dependence of @xmath43 choosing @xmath69 #20.42#1 model produced torsional oscillations in convection zone similar recent helioseismic data compare plotted in figs calph=-3.2.pr=0.1.mdi2.velocity variations of rotation rate with latitude time butterfly diagrams migrating banded zonal flows basic magnetic field parity odd ( @xmath64 ) 1#20.42#1 comparison plotted in fig [ calph=-3.2.pr=1.0.mdi2.time.series.residuals evolution residual rotation rate with time at radius @xmath70 latitude @xmath71 degrees#20.40#1 consistent with observations each hemisphere alternating latitudinal bands width 10 degrees faster slower than average zonal flows migrate towards equator in 22 years extend into convection zone amplitudes oscillations increase below surface depend on parameters model prandtl number @xmath68 amplitudes range 0.07 nhz surface to @xmath72 nhz bottom convection zone compatible results torsional oscillations model periods half global magnetic field compatible with observed period oscillations surface consistent behaviour inside convection zone strictly odd parity models have equatorial feature in butterfly diagrams velocity perturbations not present in current inversions observational data becomes weaker as prandtl number increases figures almost identical for even parity solutions feature absent large scale solar magnetic field mixed global parity predominantly odd studied solar dynamo model correct cycle period mean rotation law recent helioseismic observations model produces butterfly diagrams qualitative agreements with observedshown nonlinear coupling between magnetic field solar differential rotation due to action azimuthal component lorentz force torsional oscillations period 11 years penetrate into convection zone migrate towards equator in 22 years period oscillations half global magnetic fields agreement with observed period torsional oscillations at surface oscillations inside convection zone testable prediction not contradicted by current helioseismic observations extend over interval less than solar cycle solutions with even parity ( @xmath73 ) show larger amplitudes without equatorial feature current data suggest torsional oscillations disappear below @xmath74 contrast to model oscillations uncertainties in inversions at deeper levels dynamical model oversimplified improvements can be made predicted amplitudes for torsional oscillations likely affected by uniform density in eq . major features torsional oscillations reproduced detailed study realistic density profiles in progress thank rachel howe mike thompson for discussions helioseismic observations data in fig . supported by pparc fellowship benefited from pparc uk grant
| 0.436188
| 2,861
| 1,487
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,210
|
compass is a fixed - target experiment on the sps m2 beamline at cern .
its @xmath0lid target can be polarised both longitudinally and transversally with respect to the longitudinally polarised 160gev / c @xmath1 beam .
approximately 20% of the beam - time in 2002 , 2003 and 2004 was spent in the transverse configuration , allowing the first measurement of both the collins and sivers asymmetries on a deuterium target .
first results from the the transverse data of the compass run in 2002 are reported here .
|
the cross - sections for polarised deep inelastic scattering @xcite of leptons on spin-1/2 hadrons can be expressed at leading twist as a function of three independent quark distribution functions : the unpolarised function @xmath2 , the longitudinally polarised `` helicity '' function @xmath3 and the transversely polarised or `` transversity '' function @xmath4 .
this latter function is chiral - odd and therefore decouples from inclusive dis .
it can however be measured in semi - inclusive dis where it appears in combination with a chiral - odd fragmentation function , the collins function @xmath5 , in an azimuthal single - spin asymmetry ( ssa ) in the hadronic end - product @xcite .
a similar asymmetry could however also arise from a modulation of the transverse momentum @xmath6 of unpolarised quarks in a transversely polarised nucleon represented by the sivers function , @xmath7 @xcite .
the collins and sivers effects can be disentangled in leptoproduction on a transversely polarised nucleon , since they exhibit a dependence on linearly independent kinematic variables .
the collins hypothesis holds that the fragmentation function of a quark of flavour @xmath8 in a hadron @xmath9 can be written as @xcite : @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the final hadron transverse momentum with respect to the quark direction
i.e. the virtual photon direction and @xmath12 is the fraction of available energy carried by the hadron ( @xmath13 is the hadron energy , and @xmath14 and @xmath15 are the incoming and scattered lepton energies respectively ) .
the angle @xmath16 appearing in the fragmentation function is known as `` collins angle '' and is conveniently defined in the system where the z - axis is the virtual photon direction and the x - z plane is the muon scattering plane as @xmath17 , where @xmath18 is the hadron azimuthal angle , and @xmath19 is the azimuthal angle of the transverse spin of the struck quark ( nucleon ) . since @xmath20 , where @xmath21 is the azimuthal angle of the transverse spin of the initial quark ( nucleon ) , the relation @xmath22 is also valid . the fragmentation function @xmath23 couples to transverse spin distribution function @xmath24 and
gives rise to an ssa ( denoted as @xmath25 ) dependent on the kinematic variables @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28
. following the sivers hypothesis , the difference in the probability of finding an unpolarised quark of transverse momentum @xmath29 and @xmath30 inside a polarised nucleon can be written as @xcite : @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the azimuthal angle of the quark with respect to the nucleon transverse spin orientation .
it has been recently demonstrated by theoretical arguments @xcite , that the ssa ( denoted by @xmath33 ) coming from the coupling of the sivers function with the unpolarised fragmentation function @xmath34 can be observed at the leading twist from polarised semi - inclusive dis .
the compass @xcite experiment on the m2 beamline of the sps accelerator at cern makes use of a high energy , intense @xmath1 beam naturally polarised by the pion - decay mechanism .
the helicity of the beam is negative , and the polarisation lies at around 76% at a momentum of 160 gev / c .
the spill structure of the sps in 2002 consisted of a 4.8 s burst containing approximately @xmath35 muons followed by 11.4 s out - time .
the luminosity of the beam was around @xmath36 @xmath37s@xmath38 .
the spectrometer itself comprises two stages each equipped with a spectrometer magnet and detectors for tracking , energy determination and particle identification @xcite .
compass uses the polarised target system of the smc experiment which consists of two @xmath39lid cells , each 60 cm long and with a radius of 1.5 cm located one after the other along the beam axis . in longitudinal running a 2.5 t field is maintained by a solenoid magnet , supplemented in transverse running by an orthogonal 0.5 t dipole field .
the relaxation time of around 2000 hours of the dipole field is sufficient to allow the transverse measurement .
the two target cells are always maintained with opposite polarisation .
transverse polarisations @xmath40 of + /-
50 % are routinely reached ; the dilution factor @xmath41 of the target material is calculated to be around 0.38 .
two periods of data with transverse target polarisation were taken in 2002 . in order to compensate the different acceptances of the target cells ,
their polarity was flipped by microwave reversal halfway through each period . the counting rate asymmetry between these two sub - periods
was then measured for each target - cell separately .
the number of events in each of the two polarisation states ( @xmath42/@xmath43 ) may be written as a function of the collins ( sivers ) angle as @xmath44 where @xmath45 is the amplitude of the experimental asymmetry and @xmath46 is a function containing the acceptance of the apparatus .
the angles are always calculated assuming the target polarisation point up in the lab system .
the `` raw '' amplitude @xmath45 is connected to the collins ( sivers ) asymmetry through the expression @xmath47 with @xmath48 is the spin transfer coefficient or `` depolarisation factor '' .
indicating with @xmath49 the fractional energy transfer from muon to virtual photon in the initial scattering process , @xmath48 may be calculated from the kinematics of each individual event through @xmath50 in the case of the collins effect . for the sivers effect @xmath51 , since this effect deals with unpolarised quarks . in each period @xmath52 ( @xmath53 )
is fitted separately for the two target cells from the event flux with the two target orientations using the expression @xmath54 where @xmath55 is the ratio of the total number of events in the two target polarisation orientations . the total sample collected in the 2002 transverse data - taking periods amounted to about 200 pb@xmath38 in terms of integrated luminosity .
events were selected in which a primary vertex with identified beam and scattered muon and at least one outgoing hadron was found in one of the two target cells .
a clean separation of muon and hadron samples was achieved by cuts on the amount of material traversed in the spectrometer .
in addition , the kinematic cuts @xmath56(g@xmath57v@xmath58 , @xmath59 g@xmath57v/@xmath60 and @xmath61 were applied to the data to ensure a deep - inelastic sample above the region of the nuclear resonances and within the compass trigger acceptance .
the upper bound on @xmath49 also served to keep radiative corrections small .
the asymmetries were calculated for two different samples : both for all hadrons emerging from the primary vertex , and , a sub - sample of this , only for the most energetic or `` leading '' hadron in each event .
the leading hadron was determined as the most energetic non - muonic particle of the primary vertex with an energy component @xmath62 and a transverse momentum @xmath63 g@xmath57v/@xmath64 .
when all the hadrons coming from the primary vertex were considered , the @xmath27 cut was lowered to @xmath65 .
the final data sample had average values @xmath66 , @xmath67 and @xmath68 ( g@xmath57v@xmath58 . the average value for @xmath27 and @xmath69 are @xmath70 and @xmath71 g@xmath57v/@xmath64 respectively for the leading hadron analysis , and @xmath72 and @xmath73 g@xmath57v@xmath74 in the all hadrons case . , @xmath27 and @xmath28 .
leading hadrons analysis on top canvas , all hadrons on bottom canvas.,title="fig : " ] , @xmath27 and @xmath28 .
leading hadrons analysis on top canvas , all hadrons on bottom canvas.,title="fig : " ] the results of the asymmetries plotted against the kinematic variables @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 are shown in fig . [ results ] for positive ( full points ) and negative ( open points ) hadrons , and for the analysis of leading ( top plot ) hadron and all hadrons ( bottom plot ) .
stability checks showed that the ratio of acceptances and efficiencies as a function of the collins ( sivers ) angle does not change between two spin orientations .
furthermore the results were stable when each target cell was split into two parts and the asymmetry calculated separately , and when the data was split into high and low hadron momenta .
this leads to the conclusion that systematic effects are smaller than the statistical errors . in these first measurements of transverse spin effects on a deuteron target ,
the collins and sivers asymmetries were found to be compatible with zero within the statistical accuracy of the data
. a marginal indication of a collins effect at large @xmath27 for both positive and negative charges is seen .
coupled with hermes results on a proton target also reported at this conference , this may imply a negative neutron contribution to the asymmetries .
a sensitivity improvement of factor two is expected once the data from the 2003 and 2004 compass runs have been analysed . from 2006
onwards , a target magnet with a significantly larger acceptance should increase the statistics at high @xmath26 .
complementary measurements with a proton target are also planned .
9 v. barone , a. drago and p. g. ratcliffe , phys .
* 359 * ( 2002 ) j. c. collins , nucl .
b * 396 * ( 1993 ) 161 .
d. w. sivers , phys .
d * 41 * ( 1990 ) 83 .
[ compass collaboration ] , cern - spslc-96 - 14 .
m. anselmino , v. barone , a. drago , f. murgia , [ arxiv : hep - ph/0209073 ] .
s. j. brodsky , d.s .
hwang , i. schmidt , phys .
b * 530 * ( 2002 ) 99 .
j. c. collins , phys .
b * 536 * ( 2002 ) 43 .
et al . _ , `` recent compass spin physics results '' , these proceedings .
mallot , nim * 518*(2004 ) 121 .
|
cross - sections for polarised scattering of leptons on spin-1/2 hadrons expressed function of three quark distribution functions unpolarised longitudinally polarised transversely polarised latter chiral - odd decouples from inclusive dis measured in semi - inclusive dis with chiral - odd fragmentation function collins function azimuthal single - spin asymmetry in hadronic end - product similar asymmetry from modulation transverse momentum of unpolarised quarks in transversely polarised nucleon sivers function collins sivers effects disentangled in leptoproduction on transversely polarised nucleon on independent kinematic variables collins hypothesis holds fragmentation function of quark of flavour @xmath8 in hadron @xmath9 written as @xmath11 is final hadron transverse momentum direction fraction of available energy hadron hadron energy incoming scattered lepton energiesangle @xmath16 fragmentation function collins angle defined z - axis photon direction x - z plane muon scattering plane @xmath17 @xmath18 hadron @xmath19 transverse spin struck quark nucleon @xmath20 azimuthal angle spin initial quark relation @xmath22 valid fragmentation function @xmath23 couples to transverse spin distribution @xmath24 ssa @xmath25 ) dependent on kinematic variables @xmath26 @xmath28 difference probability unpolarised quark @xmath29 @xmath30 inside polarised nucleon as @xmath31 @xmath32 azimuthal angle quark nucleon transverse spin orientation ssa @xmath33 ) from coupling sivers function unpolarised fragmentation function @xmath34 observed at leading twist from polarised semi - inclusive dis compass @xcite experiment on m2 beamline sps accelerator at cern high energy @xmath1 beam polarised by pion - decay mechanism helicity negative polarisation 76% momentum 160 gev / c spill structure sps 2002 4.8 s burst @xmath35 muons 11.4 s out - timeluminosity beam around @xmath36 spectrometer two stages magnet detectors for tracking energy determination particle identification compass uses polarised target system smc experiment two @xmath39lid cells each 60 cm long radius 1.5 cm along beam axis longitudinal 2.5 t field by solenoid magnet transverse by 0.5 t dipole field relaxation time 2000 hours dipole transverse measurement two target cells opposite polarisation transverse polarisations @xmath40 + /- 50 % reached dilution factor @xmath41 target material around 0.38 two periods data with transverse target polarisation taken in 2002 polarity flipped by microwave reversal counting rate asymmetry measured for each target cell separately number of events in polarisation states/@xmath43 function of collins sivers ) angle @xmath45 amplitude experimental asymmetry function acceptance apparatus angles calculated assuming target polarisation point up raw amplitude @xmath45 connected to collins asymmetry @xmath47 @xmath48 spin transfer coefficient depolarisation factor@xmath49 energy transfer from muon to photon initial scattering @xmath48 calculated from kinematics each event @xmath50 collins effect sivers effect @xmath51 unpolarised quarks period @xmath52 @xmath53 fitted separately for two target cells orientations expression @xmath54 @xmath55 ratio total events two polarisation orientations total sample 2002 periods 200 pb@xmath38 integrated luminosity events selected primary vertex with beam scattered muon one outgoing hadron in target cells clean separation of muon hadron samples achieved by cuts material traversed spectrometer kinematic cuts @xmath56@xmath58 @xmath59 @xmath61 applied deep - inelastic sample above nuclear resonances compass trigger acceptance upper bound on @xmath49 radiative corrections small asymmetries calculated for two samples all hadrons primary vertex most energetic leading hadron leading hadron determined most energetic non - muonic particle primary vertex energy component @xmath62 transverse momentum @xmath63@xmath57v/@xmath64 hadrons vertex considered @xmath27 cut lowered to @xmath65final data sample average values @xmath66 average value for @xmath27 @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 leading hadron analysis @xmath72 @xmath73 all hadrons case @xmath27 @xmath28 leading hadrons analysis top all hadrons bottom canvas results asymmetries plotted against kinematic variables @xmath26 @xmath28 shown in fig . for positive negative hadrons analysis leading all hadrons bottom stability checks showed ratio of acceptances efficiencies collins sivers ) angle change between two spin orientations results stable when target cell split into two parts asymmetry calculated separately data split into high low hadron momenta conclusion systematic effects smaller than statistical errors first measurements of transverse spin effects on deuteron target collins sivers asymmetries compatible with zero statistical accuracy marginal indication of collins effect at large @xmath27 for positive negative charges hermes results on proton target may imply negative neutron contribution to asymmetries improvement of factor two expected once data from 2003 2004 compass runs analysed2006 target magnet larger acceptance increase statistics @xmath26 complementary measurements proton target planned v barone drago ratcliffe phys . 359 2002 ) collins nucl 396 1993 ) 161 sivers phys . 41 1990 ) 83 compass collaboration cern - spslc-96 - 14 anselmino barone drago f murgia arxiv hep - ph/0209073 brodsky hwang schmidt . 530 2002 ) 99 collins phys . 536 2002 ) 43 recent compass spin physics results proceedings mallot nim * 518*(2004 ) 121
| 0.351766
| 2,381
| 1,215
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,214
|
the @xmath0he isotope is important to many fields of astrophysics , including stellar evolution , chemical evolution , and cosmology .
the isotope is produced in stars which evolve through the planetary nebula phase .
planetary nebulae are the final evolutionary phase of low- and intermediate - mass stars , where the extensive mass lost by the star on the asymptotic giant branch is ionised by the emerging white dwarf .
this ejecta quickly disperses and merges with the surrounding ism .
the abundance of @xmath0he can only be derived from the hyperfine transition of the ionised @xmath0he , which is represented as @xmath0he@xmath1 , these transition can be observed in the radio at the rest frequency of 8.665ghz .
@xmath0he abundances in pne can help test models of the chemical evolution of the galaxy .
many hours have been put into trying to detect this line , using telescopes like effelsberg a 100 m dish from the max planck institute for radio astronomy , the national radio astronomy observatory ( nrao ) 140-foot telescope , the nrao very large array , the arecibo antenna , the green bank telescope , and only just recently , the deep space station 63 antenna from the madrid deep space communications complex .
|
our universe has been evolving for 13.8gyr . over these years many stars formed and ended their lives enriching the interstellar medium ( ism ) , and in consequence enriching the universe ( ( * ? ? ?
* planck collaboration et al .
very few elements have been around since the beginning , formed by the big bang nucleosynthesis ( bbn ) .
bbn is responsible for the formation of most of the helium isotope ( @xmath2he ) in the universe , along with small amounts of deuterium ( d ) , the helium isotope ( @xmath0he ) , and a very small amount of the lithium isotope ( @xmath3li ) ( ( * ? ? ?
* alpher , r. a. et al . 1948 ) ) .
the predicted abundance ( by number ) of @xmath0he ( relative to h ) formed by the bbn ( just after a few minutes after the big bang ) is 1.0@xmath410@xmath5 ( ( * ? ? ?
* karakas , a. i. & lattanzio , j. c. 2014 ) ) .
this abundance depends only on the parameter of the current density of baryonic matter .
the present interstellar @xmath0he abundance , as per all the light elements , comes from a combination of bbn and stellar nucleosynthesis ( ( * ? ? ?
* wilson , t. l. & rood , r. 1994 ) ) .
hii regions are young objects compared with the age of the universe , and represent zero - age objects .
their @xmath0he abundance is the result of 13.8gyr of galactic chemical evolution . in between
is the solar system , which traces abundances at the time of its formation , 4.6gyr ago .
observed values in pre - solar material ( ( * ? ? ?
* geiss , j. 1993 ) ) and the ism ( ( * ? ? ? * gloeckler , g. & geiss , j. 1996 ) ) imply that @xmath0he / h@xmath6(2.4@xmath70.7)@xmath410@xmath5 . these values from the ism and pre - solar material are approximately twice of the bbn , implying that the @xmath0he abundance has increased a little in the last 13.8gyr . on the other hand
any hydrogen - burning zone of a star which is not too hot ( @xmath87@xmath410@xmath9k ) will produce @xmath0he via the _ p - p _ chain , implying that stars with masses @xmath102.5m@xmath11 are net producers of @xmath0he .
for these stars , _ p - p _ burning is rapid enough to produce d _ in situ _ , and enable the production of @xmath0he ( d+ p @xmath12 @xmath0he + @xmath13 ) .
stellar evolution models indeed predict the formation of @xmath0he in significant amounts by stars of 12.5m@xmath11 , with an abundance of @xmath0he / h @xmath14 ( ( * ? ? ?
* bania , t. m. et al . 2010 ) ) , which would have raised the current @xmath0he abundance to @xmath0he / h@xmath15 , substantially higher than observed ( ( * ? ? ?
* karakas , a. i. & lattanzio , j. c. 2014 ) ) .
@xcite presented the @xmath0he problem " .
according to standard models of stellar nucleosynthesis there should be a @xmath0he / h abundance gradient in the galactic disk and the proto - solar @xmath0he / h value should be less than what is found in the present ism .
observations of the @xmath0he abundance in hii regions show almost no enrichment above the bbn value ( ( * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ? * rood , r. t. et al .
1979 ; bania , t. m. et al . 2007 ) ) . for the @xmath0he problem to be solved
, the vast majority of low - mass stars should fail to enrich the ism .
one suggestion to solve this problem is by adding extra mixing in the red giant branch ( rgb ) stage .
this extra mixing adds to the standard first dredge - up to modify the surface abundances .
@xcite estimated that while 90% of the @xmath0he is destroyed in 1m@xmath11 stars , only 40 - 60% is destroyed in a 2m@xmath11 star model , depending on the speed of mixing .
the abundance of @xmath0he can only be derived from the hyperfine transition at the rest frequency of 8.665ghz . detecting @xmath0he@xmath1 in pne challenges the sensitivity limits of all existing radio telescopes .
composite @xmath0he@xmath1 average spectrum for six planetary nebulae ( ngc 3242 , ngc 6543 , ngc 6720 , ngc 7009 , ngc 7662 , and ic 289 ) , using effelsberg , arecibo and the green bank telescope observations .
they all consistently show @xmath0he@xmath1 emission at the @xmath161mk level . using the same telescopes later on a detection
was obtained in ngc 3242 and j320 . these detections and
the composite spectrum measurements translates into an abundance of @xmath0he / h of a few 10@xmath17 ( ( * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* balser , d. s. et al .
1997 , 1999 , 2006 ) ) .
later on more effort was put into this problem , using the very large array , for several tens of hours 3 planetary nebulae were observed ( ic418 , ngc 6572 , and ngc 7009 ) , unfortunately no line was detected and only upper limits in the abundance were obtained ( ( * ? ? ? * guzman - ramirez , l. et al . 2013 ) ) . only just recently ( beginning of this year ) @xcite using the deep space station 63 antenna from the madrid deep space communications complex , another @xmath0he@xmath1 detection was observed in the planetary nebula ic418 . with more than 20 years of looking for these detections ,
so far we have only 3 objects with more than a 3@xmath18 detection of @xmath0he : j320 , ngc 3242 , and ic 418 .
he@xmath1 line detected in planetary nebulae .
the sources are ngc3242 ( balser et al .
1999 ) , j320 ( balser et al .
2006 ) , and ic418 ( this work ) . in order to facilitate the comparison ,
the abscissa is presented as radial velocities relative the lsr systemic velocity of each source ( dashed - line ) , and the intensity scale as fractions of the peak intensity of each source.,width=283,height=321 ] two aspects of these detections needs to be considered ; firstly , the derived @xmath0he@xmath1 abundance is well above model expectations for all the three objects .
this tell us that the stars do produce and release its @xmath0he into the interstellar medium .
secondly , the @xmath0he@xmath1 line profile for all the three objects shows a double peaked shape .
although the full width of the @xmath0he@xmath1 line is consistent with the optical expansion velocity , the profile differs from that of the recombination lines , peaking at the outermost velocities .
the two other planetary nebulae have reported @xmath0he@xmath1 detections : j320 ( ( * ? ? ?
* balser , d. s. et al .
2006 ) ) and ngc 3242 ( ( * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ? * balser , d. s. et al .
1997 , 1999 ) ) .
both have double peaked profiles , similar to ic418 ( fig .
[ profiles ] ) . both objects have haloes , in the case of ngc3242 possibly as large as 18 by 24arcmin diameter .
whether helium in such a halo could be photo - ionized by the star is not clear .
a double - peaked profile could arise from an expanding detached shell , which is larger than the beam of the telescope . in this case ,
the outer components of the profile , which differ from the recombination lines , come from this large region , whilst the central part of the profile arises from the inner , ionized nebula .
@xcite also proposed a contribution from a large , low density halo .
the emission in the @xmath0he@xmath1 hyperfine line scales with @xmath19 ( column density ) , and that of recombination line with @xmath20 .
therefore , a low density but high mass halo could explain the difference in profiles .
the contribution of pne to the @xmath0he abundance is crucial for understanding the galactic chemical evolution .
the number density of @xmath0he@xmath1 atoms , @xmath21(@xmath0he@xmath1 ) , can be obtained by dividing the column density @xmath22(@xmath0he@xmath1 ) by the averaged optical path , @xmath23 , through the source . representing a pn as a homogeneous sphere of radius @xmath24 , where @xmath25 is the distance , the optical path at angle from the centre @xmath26 is @xmath27 , and the optical path averaged over the source becomes @xmath28 . to calculate the fractional @xmath0he abundance we divide by the h@xmath1 density .
figure [ abundances ] shows the @xmath0he abundances of the pn ic418 ( both purple crosses , taken from @xcite ) . for comparison the upper limits calculated from @xcite observations
are presented using the red arrows .
@xcite observations are shown in green : the cross represents j320 and the arrows are the upper limits , where the mass estimates are from @xcite .
the stellar evolution models are also presented in the same figure .
he ( relative to h ) for the pn ic418 ( both purple crosses , for upper and lower estimate ) , the size of the bars correspond to the uncertainties .
red arrows are the upper limits from @xcite .
the green cross represents j320 and the green arrows represent the sample of 6 pne from @xcite .
the curves for pop i ( light - blue line ) and ii ( red dashed - line ) show the standard abundance of @xmath0he taken from @xcite .
the purple dashed - line labelled extra mixing represents the results of models including deep mixing by @xcite , and the blue line shows the stellar models using thermohaline mixing ( ( * ? ? ?
* charbonnel , c. & zahn , j .-
the black line is the primordial value of @xmath0he / h from the bbn ( ( * ? ? ?
* karakas , a. i. & lattanzio , j. c. 2014)).,width=283,height=302 ]
the values observed in these objects proves that @xmath0he is produced at the centre of low - mass stars , and is ejected into the interstellar medium at the end of its life .
however , the large amounts of @xmath0he produced in these models is at odds with the abundance of @xmath0he observed in the interstellar medium and the solar system
. further research on other planetary nebulae will be needed to solve the @xmath0he problem , but as the emission is extremely weak and hard to detect , many observing hours are needed , or telescopes with higher sensitivity like the square kilometre array will be needed to do follow this research .
|
universe evolving for 13.8gyr stars formed ended lives enriching interstellar medium ism universe planck collaboration few elements around since beginning formed by big bang nucleosynthesis ( bbn ) bbn responsible for formation helium isotope ( @xmath2he ) small amounts of deuterium d ) helium isotope @xmath0he ) small amount lithium isotope ( @xmath3li ) alpher r 1948 predicted abundance of @xmath0he relative to h ) formed by bbn after big bang is 1.0@xmath410@xmath5 karakas lattanzio 2014 abundance depends on current density of baryonic matter present interstellar @xmath0he abundance comes from combination of bbn and stellar nucleosynthesis wilson t rood 1994 hii regions are young objects represent zero - age objects @xmath0he abundance result of 13.8gyr of galactic chemical evolution in between solar system traces abundances at time formation 4.6gyr ago observed values in pre - solar material geiss 1993 ism imply @xmath0he / h@xmath6(2.4@xmath70.@xmath410@xmath5 values from ism pre - solar material twice bbn @xmath0he abundance increased last 13.8gyr hydrogen - burning zone star not too hot @xmath87@xmath410@xmath9k produce @xmath0he via _ p - p _ chain stars with masses @xmath102.5m@xmath11 net producers of @xmath0he p - p _ burning rapid produce d in situ production @xmath0he @xmath12 @xmath0he + @xmath13 stellar evolution models predict formation @xmath0he by stars of 12.5m@xmath11 abundance of @xmath0he / h @xmath14 bania 2010 raised current @xmath0he abundance to @xmath0he / h@xmath15 higher than observed 2014 @xcite presented @xmath0he problem stellar @xmath0he / h abundance gradient in galactic disk proto - solar @xmath0he / h value less than present ism observations @xmath0he abundance regions show no enrichment above bbn value for @xmath0he problem majority low - mass stars should fail to enrich ismsuggestion adding extra mixing in red giant branch rgb stage extra mixing adds standard first dredge surface abundances @xcite estimated 90% @xmath0he destroyed in 1m@xmath11 stars 40 - 60% in 2m@xmath11 star model depending speed mixing abundance @xmath0he derived from hyperfine transition at 8.665ghz detecting @xmath0he@xmath1 in pne challenges limits radio telescopes composite @xmath0he@xmath1 average spectrum for six planetary nebulae ngc 3242 6543 6720 7009 7662 ic 289 ) effelsberg arecibo green bank telescope observations show @xmath0he@xmath1 emission at @xmath161mk level detection obtained in ngc 3242 and j320 detections abundance of @xmath0he 10@xmath17 balser 1997 1999 2006 more effort problem large array 3 planetary nebulae observed ( ic418 ngc 6572 ngc 7009 no line detected upper limits in abundance obtained guzman - ramirez 2013recently this year ) @xcite using deep space station 63 antenna from madrid space communications complex another @xmath0he@xmath1 detection observed in planetary nebula ic418 20 years for detections 3 objects with more than 3@xmath18 detection of @xmath0he : j320 , ngc 3242 ic 418 he@xmath1 line detected in planetary nebulae sources are ngc3242 j320 2006 ic418 ( abscissa presented as radial velocities relative lsr systemic velocity each source intensity scale as fractions of peak intensity each source=321 two aspects derived @xmath0he@xmath1 abundance above model expectations for three objects stars produce release @xmath0he into interstellar medium @xmath0he@xmath1 line profile shows double peaked shape full width line consistent with optical expansion velocity profile differs from recombination lines peaking at outermost velocities two other planetary nebulae reported @xmath0he@xmath1 detections : j320 and ngc 3242 both have double peaked profiles similar to ic418objects have haloes ngc3242 large 18 by 24arcmin diameter helium in halo photo - ionized by star double - peaked profile could from expanding detached shell larger than beam telescope outer components from lines from large region central from inner ionized nebula @xcite proposed contribution from large low density halo emission in @xmath0he@xmath1 hyperfine line scales with @xmath19 recombination line with @xmath20 low density high mass halo could explain difference in profiles contribution of pne to @xmath0he abundance crucial for galactic chemical evolution density of @xmath0he@xmath1 atoms @xmath21 obtained by dividing column density by averaged optical path @xmath23 through source sphere radius distance optical path angle averaged over source @xmath28 fractional @xmath0he abundance divide by h@xmath1 density figure shows @xmath0he abundances of pn ic418 purple @xcite upper limits from @xcite observations using red arrows@xcite observations shown in green cross represents j320 arrows upper limits mass estimates from @xcite stellar evolution models presented in same figure relative to h pn ic418 purple crosses size bars correspond to uncertainties red arrows upper limits from @xcite green cross represents j320 green arrows sample of 6 pne from @xcite curves for pop i ii show standard abundance of @xmath0he from @xcite purple - line extra mixing models deep mixing by @xcite blue line stellar models using thermohaline mixing black line primordial value of @xmath0he h from bbn values @xmath0he produced at centre of low - mass stars ejected into interstellar medium end life large amounts @xmath0he models at odds with abundance @xmath0he in interstellar medium solar system further research on other planetary nebulae needed @xmath0he problem emission weak hard to detect many observing hours needed telescopes with higher sensitivity like square kilometre array needed
| 0.359912
| 2,657
| 1,387
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,215
|
in the past two decades lyapunov functions are used for the estimation of attractor dimensions . by means of these functions the upper estimate of lyapunov dimension for rssler attractor and the exact formulas of lyapunov dimension for hnon , chirikov , and lorenz attractors are obtained . in this report
the simplest model , suggested by glukhovsky and dolzhansky , which describes a convection process in rotating fluid , is considered .
a system of differential equations for this model is a generalization of lorenz system . for the lyapunov dimension of attractor of the model ,
the upper estimate is obtained .
chaos , chaotic attractor , generalized lorenz system , lyapunov dimension , lyapunov function , fluid convection
|
in the present paper the simplest three - dimensional system , describing the convection of fluid within an ellipsoidal rotating cavity , is considered .
this system , suggested by glukhovsky and dolghansky @xcite , is as follows @xmath0 where @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 are positive numbers . after the change of variables @xmath4 system takes the form @xmath5 where @xmath6 this system is a generalization of a classical lorenz system @xcite .
system with the parameters @xmath7 , @xmath1 , @xmath8 is mentioned first in @xcite and after the corresponding change of variables @xcite can be transformed to the rabinovich system of waves interaction in plasma @xcite .
consider system under the assumption that @xmath7 , @xmath1 , @xmath9 , @xmath10 are positive . in this case by @xcite one obtains the following : if @xmath11 , then has a unique equilibrium @xmath12 ( the trivial case ) .
if @xmath13 , then has three equilibria : @xmath12 and @xmath14 , where @xmath15 and the real number @xmath16 is defined as @xmath17.\ ] ]
consider a differential equation @xmath18 with a continuously differentiable vector function @xmath19 .
assume that for any initial value @xmath20 there exists a unique solution of @xmath21 defined for @xmath22 . here
let @xmath24 be an invariant set , i.e. @xmath25 for all @xmath22 .
suppose @xmath26 is the jacobian matrix of @xmath19 @xmath27 consider a nonsingular @xmath28-matrix @xmath29 .
suppose that @xmath30 are eigenvalues of the matrix @xmath31 here * denotes a matrix transposition . * @xcite*[theorem : th1 ] given an integer @xmath32 $ ] and @xmath33 there is a continuously differentiable scalar function @xmath34 and a nonsingular matrix @xmath29 such that @xmath35 in this case the lyapunov dimension of the compact set @xmath24 is estimated as follows @xmath36 here @xmath37 is a derivative of the function @xmath38 with respect to the vector field @xmath39 : @xmath40 * @xcite*[theorem : th2 ] suppose that there is a continuously differentiable scalar function @xmath38 and a nonsingular matrix @xmath29 such that @xmath41 then any solution of system , bounded on @xmath42 tends to an equilibrium as @xmath43 .
thus , if condition holds , then an attractor of system coincides with its stationary set .
in @xcite it is proved that system is dissipative , i.e. it possesses a bounded absorbing set and , thus , has an attractor . by theorems [ theorem : th1 ] and [ theorem : th2 ] it can be formulated the assertion , concerning the lyapunov dimension of an attractor ( denote it by @xmath24 ) of system . this assertion is a generalization of the result obtained in @xcite for @xmath44 . [
theorem : th3 ] suppose that either the inequality @xmath45 or the inequalities @xmath46 , @xmath47 are valid .
+ if @xmath48 then any solution of system , bounded on @xmath49 , tends to an equilibrium as @xmath43 .
+ if @xmath50 then @xmath51 we use the matrix @xmath52 then the eigenvalues of the corresponding matrix are the following @xmath53^{\frac{1}{2}}. & \end{aligned}\ ] ] the goal is to obtain a lyapunov - like function that allows one to check property of theorem [ theorem : th1 ] and property of theorem [ theorem : th2 ] . for considered eigenvalues one can obtain the following relation @xmath54^\frac{1}{2 } + \\ & & + \frac{2(1-s)}{\left[(\sigma - 1)^2 + a\left(\frac{\sigma}{a}+r\right)^2\right]^\frac{1}{2 } } \ , \omega(x , y , z),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath55 using the following lyapunov - like function @xmath56^{\frac{1}{2}}},\ ] ] where @xmath57 one obtains that @xmath58 therefore , if condition is satisfied and @xmath59 then for system with the given @xmath29 and @xmath38 theorem [ theorem : th1 ] gives estimation .
if condition is valid and @xmath60 , then the conditions of theorem [ theorem : th2 ] are satisfied and any solution bounded on @xmath61 tends to an equilibrium as @xmath62 . for system with @xmath44 we can obtain another upper estimation @xcite .
[ theorem : th4 ] let @xmath44 , @xmath63 and the following relations hold @xmath64 then @xmath65 we use the same idea but choose the following matrix @xmath66 and the following lyapunov - like function @xmath67 where @xmath68 further it is shown that under conditions of the theorem it is always possible to choose the parameters @xmath69 , @xmath70 such that @xmath71 where @xmath72 hence , for the chosen @xmath29 and @xmath38 the main inequality of theorem [ theorem : th1 ] @xmath73 is satisfied and this completes the proof .
[ conseq ] if 1 .
@xmath74 , @xmath75 + or 2 .
@xmath44 , @xmath63 and @xmath76 then the lyapunov dimension of the zero equilibrium of system with @xmath77 or @xmath78 coincides with .
thus for @xmath79 we have @xmath80 note that this exact formula coincides with the formula for the classical lorenz system @xcite .
in this section the above results , concerning generalization of lorenz system , are applied to system , describing the convection of fluid within an ellipsoidal rotating cavity .
nonsingular linear transformation , obviously , does not change the lyapunov dimension . in general case , it is known ( see , e.g. @xcite ) the invariance of the lyapunov dimension under a diffeomorphism .
it is known @xcite that for system if @xmath81 , then there exists one equilibrium @xmath82 .
it is stable if @xmath83 or @xmath84 . if @xmath85 , then there exist two additional equilibria @xmath86 and they are stable if @xmath87 or @xmath88 , @xmath89 . here
@xmath90 in @xcite by means of numerical simulations for the case when parameter @xmath91 it was found certain values of the parameters @xmath3 and @xmath2 for which in system it is observed either a periodic regime ( i.e. there exists a limit cycle ) or a chaotic regime ( and for system there exists a chaotic attractor ) . in @xcite for parameters @xmath92 in the phase space of system
there was obtained a chaotic self - excited attractor and for parameters @xmath93 there was localized numerically a chaotic hidden attractor ( fig .
[ fig : attractors ] ) . using linear transformation and relation ,
one can obtain corresponding parameters for system such that there exists self - excited or hidden attractor . by numerical methods @xcite one can get the following values of lyapunov dimension for the local self - excited attractor of system : @xmath94 and for the local hidden attractor of system : @xmath95 these values correspond to the values of lyapunov dimension for the global attractor @xmath96 of system obtained in corollary [ conseq ] . for ( self - excited local attractor )
we have @xmath97 and for ( hidden local attractor ) we have @xmath98
this work was supported by the russian science foundation ( 14 - 21 - 00041 ) leonov , g. , kuznetsov , n. , and mokaev , t. ( 2015b ) .
homoclinic orbit and hidden attractor in the lorenz - like system describing the fluid convection motion in the rotating cavity .
, 28(doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.04.007):166174 .
leonov , g. a. and kuznetsov , n. v. ( 2013 ) . hidden attractors in dynamical systems . from hidden oscillations in hilbert - kolmogorov ,
aizerman , and kalman problems to hidden chaotic attractors in chua circuits . , 23(1 ) .
1330002 .
semenov , v. , korneev , i. , arinushkin , p. , strelkova , g. , vadivasova , t. , and anishchenko , v. ( 2015 ) .
numerical and experimental studies of attractors in memristor - based chua s oscillator with a line of equilibria .
noise - induced effects . , 224(8):15531561 .
|
present paper simplest three - dimensional system describing convection fluid ellipsoidal rotating cavity considered system suggested by glukhovsky dolghansky @xcite follows @xmath0 positive numbers change variables @xmath4 system form @xmath5 @xmath6 generalization classical lorenz system @xcite system parameters @xmath7 mentioned first @xcite change transformed to rabinovich system waves interaction plasma @xcite system assumption @xmath7 positive obtains @xmath11 unique equilibrium @xmath12 @xmath13 three equilibria @xmath12 @xmath15 real number @xmath16 defined @xmath17. differential equation @xmath18 continuously differentiable vector function @xmath19 initial value @xmath20 unique solution @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath24 invariant set @xmath25 for @xmath22 @xmath26 jacobian matrix of @xmath19 @xmath27 nonsingular @xmath28-matrix @xmath29 @xmath30 eigenvalues matrix @xmath31 matrix transposition@xcite[theorem : th1 integer @xmath32 @xmath33 continuously differentiable scalar function @xmath34 nonsingular matrix @xmath29 @xmath35 lyapunov dimension compact set @xmath24 estimated @xmath36 @xmath37 derivative function @xmath38 vector field @xmath39 @xmath40 @xcite[theorem : th2 continuously differentiable scalar function @xmath38 nonsingular matrix @xmath29 @xmath41 solution system bounded @xmath42 tends equilibrium @xmath43 condition holds attractor system coincides stationary set system dissipative possesses bounded absorbing set attractor theorems th1 th2 assertion lyapunov dimension attractor @xmath24 system generalization result @xcite @xmath44 theorem : th3 ] inequality @xmath45 inequalities @xmath46 @xmath47 valid @xmath48 solution system bounded @xmath49 tends equilibrium @xmath43 @xmath50 @xmath51 matrix @xmath52 eigenvalues corresponding matrix @xmath53^{\frac{1}{2}}.\end{aligned goal obtain lyapunov - like function check property theorem th1 th2 eigenvalues relation @xmath54^\frac{1}{2 } +\frac{2(1-s)}\left\sigma - 1)^2 ++r\right)^2]\frac{1}{2 }\omega(x y{aligned @xmath55 lyapunov - like function @xmath56^{\frac{1}{2}}} @xmath57 obtains @xmath58 if condition satisfied @xmath59 system @xmath29 @xmath38 theorem th1 gives estimation condition valid @xmath60 conditions theorem th2 satisfied solution @xmath61 tends equilibrium @xmath62 system @xmath44 obtain upper estimation @xcite theorem th4 @xmath44 @xmath63 relations hold @xmath64 @xmath65 idea choose matrix @xmath66 lyapunov - like function @xmath67 @xmath68 under conditions possible choose parameters @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 chosen @xmath29 @xmath38 main inequality theorem @xmath73 satisfied completes proof @xmath74 @xmath75 + or 2 .@xmath44 @xmath63 @xmath76 lyapunov dimension of zero equilibrium system with @xmath77 @xmath78 coincides @xmath79 @xmath80 formula coincides with classical lorenz system @xcite results generalization lorenz system applied to system describing convection of fluid within ellipsoidal rotating cavity nonsingular linear transformation change lyapunov dimension known invariance of lyapunov dimension under diffeomorphism system @xmath81 one equilibrium @xmath82 stable if @xmath83 or @xmath84 @xmath85 two additional equilibria @xmath86 stable if @xmath87 @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath90 @xcite numerical simulations parameter @xmath91 found values of parameters @xmath3 @xmath2 periodic regime or chaotic regime attractor parameters @xmath92 obtained chaotic self - excited attractor parameters @xmath93 chaotic hidden attractor using linear transformation relation obtain corresponding parameters for system exists self - excited or hidden attractornumerical methods values lyapunov local self - excited attractor @xmath94 hidden attractor @xmath95 correspond global attractor @xmath96 self - excited local attractor @xmath97 hidden attractor @xmath98 supported russian science foundation 14 - 21 - 00041 ) leonov kuznetsov mokaev 2015b homoclinic orbit hidden attractor lorenz - like system fluid convection motion rotating cavity 28(doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.04.007):166174 leonov kuznetsov 2013 hidden attractors dynamical systems hilbert - kolmogorov aizerman kalman chaotic attractors chua circuits 23(1 ) 1330002 semenov korneev arinushkin strelkova vadivasova anishchenko 2015 numerical experimental studies attractors memristor - based chua s oscillator line equilibria noise - induced effects 224(8):15531561
| 0.31388
| 2,062
| 1,142
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,226
|
axion - like particles ( alps ) are a common prediction of certain theories beyond the standard model and couple to photons in the presence of external magnetic fields . as a consequence
, photon - alp conversions could lead to an enhancement of the flux of extragalactic @xmath0-ray sources that is otherwise attenuated due to the interactions with background radiation fields .
the magnetic fields traversed by the @xmath0 rays are often turbulent and frequently modelled with a simple domain - like structure . given a maximum mixing between photons and alps ,
we show that in such models realisations of the fields exist for which the photon - alp oscillation probability vanishes .
this behaviour does not occur in more sophisticated magnetic - field models .
|
very high energy @xmath0 rays ( vhe ; energy @xmath1gev ) originating from extragalactic objects interact with photons of the extragalactic background light ( ebl ) leading to an exponential attenuation of the @xmath0-ray flux emitted by the source @xcite .
direct detections of the ebl are difficult due to foreground emission @xcite and thus the exact level of the ebl photon density remains unknown .
recent ebl models ( e.g. refs .
@xcite ) predict densities close to lower limits deduced from galaxy number counts @xcite .
in simple emission models of blazars - ray emitters , see e.g. http://tevcat.uchicago.edu/. ] , no spectral hardening is expected at vhe and consequently spectra corrected for ebl absorption should not show such features .
nevertheless , evidence for such signatures has been found @xcite .
an explanation might be the oscillations of @xmath0-rays into axion - like particles ( alps ) , spin-0 pseudo - nambu - goldstone bosons that arise in certain standard model extensions .
these particles couple to photons in external magnetic fields ( see ref .
@xcite for a review ) and could lead to a flux enhancement as alps do not interact with ebl photons .
several turbulent magnetic - field environments have been studied in this respect including the intergalactic magnetic field @xcite , the agn host galaxy @xcite , intra - galaxy - cluster fields @xcite , magnetic fields in agn lobes @xcite , and in the milky way @xcite .
the turbulent fields are commonly modelled with a simple domain - like structure : the path length is split up into @xmath2 domains of coherence length @xmath3 .
while the field strength remains constant over all cells , the orientation of the field is assumed to change randomly from one cell to the next .
the random nature of the field makes it necessary to calculate the conversion probability for a large number of random realisations .
as @xmath2 grows , the photon - alp oscillations can often only be calculated numerically . here
, we show analytically that in these simple models realisations exist for which the photon - alp conversion probability vanishes .
the equations of motion of a monochromatic photon - alp beam composed of the two photon polarisation states @xmath4 and the alp field strength @xmath5 , @xmath6 , of energy @xmath7 propagating along the @xmath8 axis in a cold plasma with homogeneous magnetic field can be written as @xcite @xmath9 where the mixing is induced by off - diagonal elements of the mixing matrix @xmath10 .
the resulting photon - alp oscillations are similar to neutrino oscillations and we denote the mixing angle by @xmath11 ( see , e.g. ref .
@xcite for the full expressions for @xmath12 and @xmath11 ) .
equation can be solved with the transfer matrix @xmath13 , so that @xmath14 , where @xmath15 denotes the angle between the transversal magnetic field and the photon polarisation state along @xmath16 @xcite . with the eigenvalues @xmath17 , @xmath18 , of the mixing matrix and introducing the notation @xmath19 and @xmath20
, the transfer matrix can be written as @xcite @xmath21 for @xmath2 consecutive domains with angle @xmath22 in each domain , it can be shown that the total transfer matrix is given as a product over all domains , @xmath23 present @xmath0-ray experiments can not measure the polarisation .
therefore , one has to generalise the problem at hand to the density matrix formalism , where @xmath24 @xcite .
the probability for an initially unpolarised photon beam , @xmath25 , to oscillate into an alp , @xmath26 is then given by @xcite @xmath27 the oscillation probability will take some value @xmath28 @xcite depending on the realisation of the angles @xmath29 and the mixing angle .
interestingly , realisations exist for which @xmath30 even though @xmath31 . to show this we assume an even number of domains where @xmath32 in one half of the domains and @xmath33 in the other half ( where @xmath34 is a real non - zero number ) ordered randomly .
a straightforward calculations shows that the commutator of the transfer matrices @xmath35 $ ] is an anti - symmetric matrix with entries @xmath36 and zero in all other entries .
the matrix elements of the product @xmath37 that induce mixing ( i.e. , the @xmath38 , @xmath39 elements in the current basis ) are found to be equal to @xmath40 . above a critical energy @xmath41
the mixing becomes independent of energy .
if in addition the mixing is strong so that @xmath42 , the commutator and the mixing inducing matrix elements vanish . with the commutator equal to zero we can now combine all pairs of @xmath43 and @xmath44 transfer matrices and see that the resulting product of all matrices given in eq
. does not induce any photon - alp mixing . as an example , we show this behaviour in fig . [
fig : ex ] , in which we assume magnetic - field parameters found in galaxy clusters . the conversion probability is calculated numerically following eq . .
above the critical energy the probability goes to zero , however , around the critical energy oscillations still occur . our findings still hold even if photon absorption is included as it is the case for conversions in the intergalactic magnetic field .
however , as this magnetic field evolves with redshift , not all realisations lead to a conversion probability exactly equal to zero for all random permutations .
as shown in the previous section , the photon - alp conversion probability can be exactly zero in special configurations of a turbulent magnetic field given that ( a ) it is modelled with a simple cell - like structure and ( b ) that the mixing occurs in the strong mixing regime , i.e. at energies @xmath45 and @xmath42 .
oscillations around the critical energy still occur making spectral features at this energy a universal prediction of photon - alp oscillations .
the absence of such signatures in @xmath0-ray spectra has already been used to constrain the photon - alp coupling @xcite . in more realistic models of the turbulent field ( that use , e.g. , a kolmogorov turbulence spectrum )
we do not have the freedom to choose the @xmath15 angles ( see , e.g. ref .
@xcite ) and we can not easily construct a scenario with vanishing mixing as done here . utilizing such models , it can be shown that the future cherenkov telescope array will be sensitive to detect a boost in the photon flux for photon - alp couplings @xmath46 and alp masses @xmath47
@xcite , the same parameters that could explain evidence for a reduced opacity for vhe @xmath0-rays @xcite .
mm is supported by a grant of the knut and alice wallenberg foundation , pi : jan conrad
|
high energy @xmath0 rays from extragalactic objects interact with photons extragalactic background light ebl to exponential attenuation of-ray flux direct detections of ebl difficult due to foreground emission exact ebl photon density unknown recent ebl models predict densities close to lower limits from galaxy number counts emission models of blazars - ray emitters no spectral hardening expected at vhe spectra corrected for ebl absorption show such features evidence for signatures found @xcite explanation might be oscillations of @xmath0-rays into axion - like particles ( alps particles couple to photons in external magnetic fields could lead to flux enhancement with ebl photons turbulent magnetic - field environments studied including intergalactic magnetic field agn host galaxy intra - galaxy - cluster fields in agn lobes milky way turbulent fields modelled with domain - like structure path length split into domains of length field strength constant over cells orientation randomly random nature necessary to calculate conversion probability for random realisations@xmath2 grows photon - alp oscillations calculated numerically show models photon - alp conversion probability vanishes equations motion monochromatic photon - alp beam two photon polarisation states alp field strength energy axis cold plasma homogeneous magnetic field written as @xcite @xmath9 mixing induced by off - diagonal elements mixing matrix @xmath10 photon - alp oscillations similar to neutrino oscillations denote mixing angle by @xmath11 equation solved with transfer matrix @xmath13 angle between transversal magnetic field photon polarisation state eigenvalues @xmath17 @xmath18 mixing matrix notation @xmath19 @xmath20 transfer matrix written as @xcite @xmath21 @xmath2 consecutive domains angle @xmath22 each domain total transfer matrix product over all domains @xmath23 @xmath0-ray experiments measure polarisation problem density matrix formalism @xmath24 @xciteprobability for unpolarised photon beam @xmath25 to oscillate into alp @xmath26 given by @xcite @xmath27 oscillation probability value @xmath28 @xcite on realisation angles @xmath29 mixing angle realisations exist for @xmath30 @xmath31 assume even number domains @xmath32 @xmath33 half ordered randomly commutator matrices @xmath35 anti - symmetric matrix with entries @xmath36 and zero matrix elements @xmath37 induce mixing @xmath38 equal to @xmath40 above critical energy @xmath41 mixing independent of energy if mixing strong @xmath42 commutator mixing inducing matrix elements vanish with commutator equal to zero combine pairs of @xmath43 and @xmath44 transfer matrices resulting product induce photon - alp mixing behaviour in fig . magnetic - field parameters in galaxy clusters conversion probability calculated numerically above critical energy probability goes to zero around critical energy oscillations occur findings hold if photon absorption included conversions intergalactic magnetic fieldmagnetic field evolves with redshift not all realisations conversion probability equal to zero for permutations photon - alp conversion probability can be zero in special configurations turbulent magnetic field modelled with simple cell structure mixing occurs in strong mixing regime at energies @xmath45 @xmath42 oscillations around critical energy occur spectral features energy universal prediction of photon - alp oscillations absence of signatures in @xmath0-ray spectra photon - alp coupling @xcite realistic models turbulent field freedom to choose @xmath15 angles construct scenario with vanishing mixing future cherenkov telescope array sensitive to detect boost in photon flux for photon - alp couplings @xmath46 @xmath47 @xcite reduced opacity for @xmath0-rays @xcite supported by grant knut and alice wallenberg foundation
| 0.265333
| 1,554
| 756
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,228
|
we study whether the broad enhancement @xmath0 arises from the final state interaction ( fsi ) of @xmath1 decays .
we consider both the absorptive and dispersive contribution of the above amplitudes since the intermediate states are very close to @xmath2 .
the same mechanism leads to a similar enhancement around 1580 mev in the @xmath3 spectrum in the @xmath4 channel , which can be used to test whether @xmath0 can be ascribed to the fsi effect of @xmath5 .
|
a broad enhancement @xmath0 with @xmath6 was observed by bes collaboration in @xmath7 invariant mass spectrum in the @xmath8 channel @xcite .
its resonance parameters are @xmath9 mev .
the branching ratio is @xmath10\cdot b[x(1576)\to k^{+}k^{-}]=(8.5\pm 0.6^{+2.7}_{-3.6})\times 10^{-4}$ ] .
its extremely large width around 800 mev motivated theoretical explanations such as a @xmath11 molecular state @xcite , tetraquark @xcite , diquark - antidiquark bound state @xcite , a composition of @xmath12 and @xmath13 @xcite .
since there are two broad overlapping resonances @xmath12 and @xmath13 with the same quantum number around 1600 mev , we investigated whether such a broad signal could be produced by the final state interaction ( fsi ) @xcite effect in our previous work @xcite .
we noticed that the interference effect of @xmath2 could produce an enhancement around @xmath14 mev with the opening of the @xmath15 channel , similar to the cusp effect discussed in ref .
however , the branching ratio @xmath16\cdot b[\rho(1450,1700)\to k^{+}k^{-}]$ ] from the fsi effect was far less than the experimental data .
it s important to point out that we considered only the contribution of the absorptive part in ref .
@xcite .
recently meng and chao explored the possible assignment of @xmath17 as the @xmath18 candidate @xcite .
they found the dispersive part of the fsi amplitude contributes more importantly to the hidden charm decay width of @xmath17 than the imaginary part derived in ref .
@xcite because the intermediate states @xmath19 and @xmath20 lie very close to @xmath17 .
motivated by the above observation , we investigate the potential role of the dispersive contribution of fsi since the @xmath15 intermediate states are rather close to @xmath2 .
this paper is organized as follows .
the formulation of @xmath21 by exchanging @xmath22 is presented in section [ sec2 ] and our numerical result and discussion in section [ sec3 ] .
as shown in fig . [ kk ] , we focus on the fsi of the @xmath15 intermediate states through the exchange of the @xmath22 meson : @xmath21 .
[ cols="^,^ " , ] c in this short note , we revisit the final state interaction of the @xmath5 decay .
different from our former work @xcite , we consider the additional contribution from the dispersive part .
our result shows that there exists an enhancement around 1580 mev as shown in fig .
[ diagrams ] .
such an enhancement occurs with the opening of the @xmath15 channel .
the decay width of @xmath23 from the fsi effect is a few mev only .
if the width of @xmath2 is 300 mev , the branching ratio of @xmath24 is about @xmath25 . with @xmath26
$ ] roughly around @xmath27 @xcite , @xmath28\cdot b[\rho(1450,1700)\to ab\to k^{+ } { k}^{-}]$ ] is about @xmath29 .
the dispersive contribution enhances the branching ratio of @xmath30 by two orders than that in ref .
however , such a ratio is still far less than experimental value @xmath31\cdot b[x(1576)\to k^{+}{k}^{-}]=(8.5\pm 0.6^{+2.7}_{-3.6})\times 10^{-4}$ ] , although the @xmath32 spectrum from the fsi effect of @xmath2 decays mimics the observed broad spectrum from bes s measurement . throughout our calculation , we ignored the direct coupling between @xmath33 and @xmath34 .
recently , li argued that @xmath33 can have strong coupling with @xmath7 at the tree level @xcite . adding this contribution certainly increases the branching ratio .
however , the experimental upper limit of @xmath35 $ ] is @xmath36 and @xmath34 is not one of the dominant decay modes of @xmath13 @xcite .
clearly , future besiii high - statistics data around 1.6 gev in the @xmath34 channel will be very helpful in the clarification of @xmath0 .
we also calculate the decay amplitude of @xmath37 using the same technique .
there exists one similar enhancement around 1580 mev , which is shown in fig .
[ diagrams-1 ] .
this enhancement will be useful to test if x(1576 ) arises from the fsi effect .
we thank prof . b.s .
zou for the useful suggestion .
this project was supported by the national natural science foundation of china under grants 10421503 and 10625521 , and the china postdoctoral science foundation ( 20060400376 ) .
n. isgur , k. maltman , j. weinstein and t. barnes , phys .
lett . * 64 * , 161 ( 1990 ) ; m.p .
locher , v.e .
markusin and h.q .
zheng , report no .
psi - pr-96 - 13 ( unpublished ) ; h. lipkin , nucl . phys . * b 244 * , 147 ( 1984 ) ; h. lipkin , phys . lett . *
b 179 * , 278 ( 1986 ) ; h. lipkin , nucl .
* b 291 * , 720 ( 1987 ) .
|
enhancement @xmath0 @xmath6 observed collaboration @xmath7 mass spectrum @xmath8 channel resonance parameters @xmath9 mev branching ratio @xmath10 b[x(1576) k+-=(8.5 0.6^{+2.7}{-3.6})\times 10^{-4}$ large width 800 mev explanations @xmath11 molecular state tetraquark diquark - antidiquark bound state composition @xmath12 @xmath13 two overlapping resonances @xmath12 @xmath13 quantum number 1600 mev investigated signal final state interaction @xcite effect interference effect @xmath2 enhancement @xmath14 mev opening @xmath15 channel similar cusp effect branching ratio @xmath16,1700) k{+}k{-}$ fsi effect less than experimental data considered contribution absorptive part meng chao explored assignment @xmath17 @xmath18 candidate @xcite dispersive part fsi amplitude contributes hidden charm decay width @xmath17 than intermediate states @xmath19 @xmath20 close to @xmath17motivated observation investigate potential dispersive contribution fsi @xmath15 intermediate states close to @xmath2 paper organized formulation of @xmath21 exchanging @xmath22 in section sec2 numerical result discussion in section sec3 ] focus on fsi @xmath15 intermediate states exchange @xmath22 meson : @xmath21 revisit final state interaction @xmath5 decay consider additional contribution from dispersive part result shows enhancement around 1580 mev fig enhancement occurs with opening @xmath15 channel decay width of @xmath23 from fsi effect few mev if width @xmath2 300 mev branching ratio @xmath24 about @xmath25 @xmath26 around @xmath27 @xmath28 about @xmath29 dispersive contribution enhances branching ratio @xmath30 by two orders ratio less than experimental value @xmath31=(8.5\pm 0.6^{+2.7-3.6})\times 10{-4}$ @xmath32 spectrum from fsi effect @xmath2 decays mimics broad spectrum from bes s measurementignored direct coupling between @xmath33 @xmath34 argued @xmath33 strong coupling with @xmath7 tree level adding contribution increases branching ratio experimental upper limit @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath34 not dominant decay @xmath13 @xcite future high - statistics data 1.6 gev @xmath34 channel helpful clarification @xmath0 calculate decay amplitude @xmath37 same technique similar enhancement around 1580 mev shown in fig . enhancement useful test if x(1576 ) arises from fsi effect thank prof. b zou suggestion project supported by national natural science foundation china grants 10421503 10625521 china postdoctoral science foundation isgur maltman weinstein barnes . lett. 64 161 ( 1990 ) locher markusin zheng report psi - pr-96 - 13 unpublished lipkin phys 244 147 ( 1984 ) 179 278 ( 1986 ) 291 720 ( 1987 )
| 0.185796
| 1,269
| 673
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,229
|
effects of three - nucleon forces arising from the exchange of a pion and a scalar - isoscalar object among three nucleons on nucleon - deuteron scattering observables are studied .
|
the introduction of a three - nucleon force ( 3nf ) arising from the exchange of two pions among three nucleons ( 2@xmath0e ) as shown in fig .
[ fig:3nf - graph ] ( a ) into nuclear hamiltonian is known to get rid of discrepancies between experimental data and theoretical calculations with realistic two - nucleon forces ( 2nfs ) for the three - nucleon ( 3n ) binding energies and nucleon - deuteron ( nd ) differential cross sections . on the other hand ,
the 2@xmath0e 3nf is unsuccessful in explaining some nd polarization observables , _
e.g. _ , too small effects to vector analyzing powers ( vaps ) and undesirable contributions to tensor analyzing powers ( taps ) in low - energy nd elastic scattering ( see fig .
[ fig : t21-br-3 - 28mev ] ) . in refs .
@xcite , we have pointed out that tensor components in the 2@xmath0e 3nf should be responsible to the problem in taps . in this paper , we examine a 3nf due to the exchange of a pion and a scalar - isoscalar object ( @xmath0-s ) shown in fig .
[ fig:3nf - graph ] ( b ) as a possible source of tensor interactions that have different characteristics from those of the 2@xmath0e 3nf . after giving a general form of the @xmath0-s 3nf in sec .
[ sec : ps-3nf ] , numerical results for the 3n binding energy and nd scattering observables will be presented in sec . [
sec : results ] .
summary is given in sec .
[ sec : summary ] . of @xmath1 elastic scattering at @xmath2 mev and @xmath3 mev .
the data are taken from refs .
@xcite for 3 mev and from ref .
@xcite for 28 mev .
[ fig : t21-br-3 - 28mev ] , title="fig : " ] of @xmath1 elastic scattering at @xmath2 mev and @xmath3 mev .
the data are taken from refs .
@xcite for 3 mev and from ref .
@xcite for 28 mev .
[ fig : t21-br-3 - 28mev ] , title="fig : " ] of @xmath1 elastic scattering at @xmath2 mev and @xmath3 mev .
the data are taken from refs .
@xcite for 3 mev and from ref .
@xcite for 28 mev .
[ fig : t21-br-3 - 28mev ] ]
we will consider the following models for the @xmath0-s 3nfs : @xmath0-@xmath4 exchange with the excitation of the roper resonance @xmath5 ( @xmath6-@xmath7 ) @xcite ; @xmath0-@xmath4 exchange corresponding to the nucleon born diagrams ( so called pair or z diagrams ) for the pv ( @xmath6-@xmath8 ) or the ps ( @xmath6-@xmath9 ) @xmath10 coupling @xcite ; @xmath0-``effective scalar field '' exchange by a linear model @xcite or by a nonlinear model @xcite ; @xmath0-``effective 2@xmath0 '' exchange ( @xmath6-@xmath11 ) @xcite . a coordinate space representation of these potentials corresponding to diagram fig . [ fig:3nf - graph ] ( b )
is : @xmath12 y_\pi(r_{12 } ) y_\sigma(r_{32 } ) , \label{eq : wps}\ ] ] where @xmath13 with @xmath14 being a position vector of nucleon @xmath15 .
when a dipole @xmath16 form factor with a cutoff mass @xmath17 is used , the function @xmath18 becomes @xmath19 .
expressions of @xmath20 and @xmath21 for the @xmath0-s 3nfs @xcite are shown in table [ tab : pot_strength ] .
.[tab : pot_strength ] the potential strengths @xmath20 and @xmath21 for the @xmath0-s 3nf models and and effects of the 3nfs on the @xmath22h energy : @xmath23 . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
in the present calculations , we use the following parameters : @xmath24 ; another coupling constants from table iii of ref .
@xcite ; @xmath25 mev ; a set of @xmath26 for the @xmath27 ) 3nf @xcite ; @xmath28 mev and @xmath29 mev .
first , we note that the argonne @xmath30 ( av18 ) 2nf @xcite underbinds the triton ( @xmath22h ) by 0.85 mev , and the brazil 2@xmath0e ( br@xmath31 ) 3nf @xcite gives an additional attraction of -1.75 mev .
thus a repulsive effect is expected to the @xmath0-s 3nf to complete the nuclear hamiltonian . calculated values of the @xmath22h energy for the av18 plus each of the @xmath0-s 3nf models are presented in table [ tab : pot_strength ] as differences from the av18 calculation .
this shows that a @xmath0-s 3nf with ( positive ) @xmath20-term produces an attractive contribution to the @xmath22h energy , and that with ( negative ) @xmath21-term a repulsive contribution , which is consistent with the results given in ref .
the @xmath6 - 2@xmath32 3nf consists of a negative @xmath20-term and a negative @xmath21-term , and produces a repulsive effect mostly due to the @xmath20-term . in order to investigate effects of each term in the @xmath0-s 3nf on nd scattering observables
, we pick up the following two @xmath0-s 3nf models to reproduce the @xmath22h energy together with the av18 2nf , the br@xmath33 3nf , and a phenomenological spin - orbit type 3nf ( so ) @xcite : @xmath34 the @xmath6-@xmath8 3nf as a representative to @xmath21 term ; @xmath34 the @xmath6 - 2@xmath32 3nf as a representative to @xmath20 term although it includes a small effect from @xmath21 term .
( in this case , we take @xmath35 mev . )
the inclusion of the so 3nf is effective to reproduce the vaps , but gives only minor effects on the @xmath22h energy and the taps at low energies .
numerical results of faddeev calculations @xcite for the tensor analyzing power @xmath36 at @xmath37 mev and @xmath38 mev are presented in fig .
[ fig : t21-ps-3 - 28mev ] , where we plot the experimental data and the results with the 3nfs divided by the av18 calculations . for @xmath36 at 3 mev , both @xmath0-s 3nfs equally tend to cancel the effect due to the 2@xmath0e 3nf opposite to the data , but still leave an amount of discrepancy . at 28 mev , the 3nfs contribute to @xmath36 in different ways depending on scattering angles . at scattering angles of @xmath39 to @xmath40 , the calculation with the br@xmath31 3nf and the one with the br@xmath31 + @xmath41 3nfs look consistent with the data . on the other hand , at scattering angles of @xmath42 to @xmath43 , the calculation with the br@xmath31 + @xmath6-@xmath8 3nfs as well as the one with only 2nf look consistent with the data . in fig .
[ fig : del - sig - tl - ps ] ( a ) , we display results of the transversal @xmath44 and the longitudinal @xmath45 asymmetries of the spin dependent total cross sections in @xmath46 scattering comparing with recent experimental data of @xmath45 @xcite . in ref .
@xcite , we showed that effects of tensor interactions are prominent in the difference of @xmath47 . as expected ,
differences of tendency in tensor components of the 3nfs are significantly observed in fig .
[ fig : del - sig - tl - ps ] ( b ) . and @xmath45 ( a ) , and their difference ( b ) .
the data of @xmath45 are taken from ref . @xcite .
[ fig : del - sig - tl - ps ] ] and @xmath45 ( a ) , and their difference ( b ) .
the data of @xmath45 are taken from ref .
[ fig : del - sig - tl - ps ] ]
we have examined three - nucleon forces arising from the exchange of @xmath0 and scalar - isoscalar object among three nucleons : @xmath0-@xmath4 exchange via z - diagram ( @xmath21-term in eq .
( [ eq : wps ] ) ) ; @xmath0-effective 2@xmath0 exchange ( @xmath20-term , small @xmath21-term ) . both models produce repulsive effects on the @xmath22h energy to compensate strong attraction caused by the 2@xmath0e 3nf .
each 3nf affects polarization observables of nucleon - deuteron scattering , @xmath36 and @xmath48 , in different ways .
this shows that further measurements of these observables at some energies provide additional information on three - nucleon forces , which should be included in the nuclear hamiltonian in addition to the 2@xmath0e 3nf .
s. ishikawa , m. tanifuji , and y. iseri , proc . of the seventeenth international iupap conference on few - body problems in physics .
durham , north carolina , usa , june 5 - 10 , 2003 , edited by w. glckle , w. tornow , ( elsevier , 2004 ) s61 .
|
introduction three - nucleon force 3nf ) from exchange two pions ( 2@xmath0e ) in graph into nuclear hamiltonian discrepancies between experimental data theoretical calculations with two - nucleon forces for three - nucleon binding energies nucleon - deuteron differential cross sections 2@xmath0e 3nf unsuccessful explaining nd polarization observables small effects to vector analyzing powers undesirable contributions to tensor analyzing powers in low - energy elastic scattering fig - 28mev tensor components in 2@xmath0e 3nf responsible to problem in taps 3nf due to exchange pion scalar - isoscalar object ( @xmath0-s ) fig:3nf - graph possible source of tensor interactions different characteristics from@xmath0e 3nf form @xmath0-s 3nf numerical results for 3n binding energy nd scattering observables presented in results summary of @xmath1 elastic scattering at @xmath2 mev @xmath3 mev data from refs @xcite 3 mev 28 mevfig : t21-br-3 - 28mev @xmath1 elastic scattering mev data from @xcite 3 ref @xcite 28 mev t21-br-3 - 28mev @xmath1 elastic scattering mev data from refs @xcite 3 28 consider models @xmath0-s 3nfs @xmath0-@xmath4 exchange excitation roper resonance @xmath5 @xmath6-@xmath7 ) @xcite @xmath0-@xmath4 exchange nucleon born diagrams pair or z diagrams pv ps @xmath10 coupling @xcite @xmath0-``effective scalar field exchange linear nonlinear model @xmath0-``effective 2@xmath0 exchange @xmath6-@xmath11 ) coordinate space representation potentials diagram fig . fig:3nf - graph @xmath12 y_\pi(r_{12 } ) y_\sigma(r_{32 } ) @xmath13 @xmath14 position vector nucleon @xmath15 dipole @xmath16 form factor cutoff mass @xmath17 used function @xmath18 becomes @xmath19@xmath20 @xmath0-s 3nfs @xcite shown table tab pot_strength potential strengths @xmath20-s 3nf models effects @xmath22h energy @xmath23 calculations parameters @xmath24 coupling constants table iii @xcite @xmath25 mev @xmath26 @xmath27 3nf @xmath28 mev @xmath29 mev argonne @xmath30 ) 2nf @xcite underbinds triton @xmath22h ) 0.85 mev brazil 2@xmath0e ) 3nf @xcite additional attraction -1.75 mev repulsive effect expected @xmath0-s 3nf nuclear hamiltonian calculated values @xmath22h energy av18 @xmath0-s 3nf models presented in table pot_strength differences from av18 calculation @xmath0-s 3nf positive @xmath20-term attractive contribution @xmath22h energy negative @xmath21-term repulsive contribution consistent results @xmath6 - 2@xmath32 3nf negative @xmath20-term negative @xmath21-term produces repulsive effect due @xmath20-terminvestigate effects term @xmath0-s 3nf scattering observables two 3nf models reproduce @xmath22h energy av18 2nf br@xmath33 3nf spin - orbit type 3nf @xmath34 @xmath6-@xmath8 3nf @xmath21 term @xmath34 - 2@xmath32 3nf @xmath20 term small effect @xmath21 term @xmath35 mev inclusion so 3nf vaps minor effects @xmath22h energy taps at low energies results faddeev calculations tensor analyzing power @xmath36 @xmath37 mev @xmath38 mev presented fig . experimental data results 3nfs divided av18 calculations @xmath36 at 3 mev @xmath0-s 3nfs cancel effect 2@xmath0e 3nf leave discrepancy 28 mev 3nfs contribute @xmath36 scattering angles scattering angles @xmath39 to @xmath40 calculation br@xmath31 3nf br@xmath31 + @xmath41 3nfs consistent dataat scattering angles of @xmath42 to @xmath43 calculation with br@xmath31 + @xmath6-@xmath8 3nfs one with 2nf consistent with data fig . results transversal @xmath44 and longitudinal @xmath45 asymmetries of spin dependent total cross sections in @xmath46 scattering with recent experimental data of @xmath45 @xcite effects tensor interactions prominent in difference of @xmath47 differences of tendency in tensor components of 3nfs observed in fig @xmath45 difference data @xmath45 taken from ref examined three - nucleon forces from exchange of @xmath0 and scalar - isoscalar object among three nucleons : @xmath0-@xmath4 exchange via z - diagram @xmath21-term @xmath0-effective 2@xmath0 exchange both models produce repulsive effects on @xmath22h energy compensate attraction 2@xmath0e 3nf each 3nf affects polarization observables of nucleon - deuteron scattering @xmath36 and @xmath48 different waysshows measurements provide information three - nucleon forces included nuclear hamiltonian 2@xmath0e 3nf ishikawa tanifuji iseri seventeenth international iupap conference few - body problems durham north carolina usa june 5 - 10 2003 edited glckle tornow elsevier 2004 s61
| 0.347678
| 2,322
| 1,269
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,236
|
the evolution of the closed friedmann universe with a packet of short scalar waves is considered with the help of the wheeler dewitt equation .
the packet ensures conservation of homogeneity and isotropy of the metric on average .
it is shown that during tunneling the amplitudes of short waves of a scalar field can increase catastrophically promptly if their influence to the metric do not take into account .
this effect is similar to the rubakov - effect of catastrophic particle creation calculated already in 1984 . in our approach to the problem it is possible to consider self - consistent dynamics of the expansion of the universe and amplification of short waves .
it results in a decrease of the barrier and interruption of amplification of waves , and we get an exit of the wave function from the quantum to the classically available region
. = -10.0 mm = 0.0 mm = 0.0 mm
|
here we present the basic equations of the problem . in the space - time of the closed cosmological friedmann models with space - time metric @xmath0,\ ] ] where @xmath1
, the action is assumed to be @xmath2\sqrt{-g}\,d\omega,\ ] ] here @xmath3 is a scalar curvature , @xmath4 is a potential of the scalar quantum field with a mass @xmath5 , ( @xmath6 ) , @xmath7 is a cosmological @xmath8 - term .
the equation for @xmath9 has the form @xmath10 .
below let us set the scalar field as radial standing waves with time - dependent amplitudes @xmath11 note that the functions @xmath12 do not have singularities on the poles @xmath13 for integer numbers @xmath14 , and that they are orthonormal on the coordinate @xmath15 in the measure defined by metric ( [ doc1 ] ) , i.e. , @xmath16 now the action ( [ doc2 ] ) can be integrated over the angular variables , and we rewrite it after replacement of @xmath3 by its value through @xmath17 as @xmath18dt,\ ] ] where @xmath19 these redefinitions are made to get @xmath20 and @xmath21 only in front of the integral , and the integrand to be free of both constants . in this formula ,
the point denotes the derivative with respect to @xmath22 , and one supposes that all @xmath23 , i.e. , we assume that waves with wavelength comparable to the diameter of the universe are negligible for the dynamics .
the waves packet @xmath24 ensures the homogeneity of the model during expansion with a high accuracy .
after introduction of generalized momenta the hamiltonian function can be presented as @xmath25 here @xmath26 are a generalized momentum and a coordinate for the universe as entire ; @xmath27 and @xmath28 are the same for each radial mode of the field .
corresponding to eq .
( [ doc6 ] ) the wheeler - dewitt equation for the wave function of the universe ( wf ) has the form @xmath29 where the superpotential @xmath30 is given as @xmath31 .\ ] ] here we are neglecting @xmath32 in comparison with the sum residual in eq .
( [ doc8 ] ) since @xmath23 .
this is justified because in the short - wavelength approximation we are applying here , the mass of the particles does not have much influence . the factor ordering parameter @xmath33 @xcite is also introduced in eq . ( [ doc8 ] ) .
we are going to search a solution of equation ( [ doc7 ] ) in semiclassical approximation @xmath34 where @xmath35 is a classical action . in this approximation we have @xmath36 this nonlinear equation of the first order is similar to the hamilton - jacobi equation of analytical mechanics . for its solution one can take advantage of the complete integral @xcite .
it can be found from the system of characteristic equations @xcite . as the eq .
( [ doc10 ] ) supposes the solution for @xmath37 , the scale factor becomes an argument along the characteristics . from here
we have @xmath38 here @xmath30 is indicated by ( [ doc8 ] ) , and @xmath39 now the evolution of the wf @xmath40 goes along a characteristic .
turning points are the roots of @xmath41 .
they separate classically available and forbidden regions along the characteristic eq .
( [ doc11 ] ) @xcite .
a similar approach for the strongly anisotropic wf in a bianchi type i model is presented in ref .
@xcite , and for a closed friedmann model in ref .
@xcite . in the region under the barrier
the semiclassical solution can be found by an ansatz of the form @xmath42 the equation for @xmath43 can be obtained from eq .
( [ doc10 ] ) by changing @xmath44 .
thus , as distinct from eq .
( [ doc11 ] ) the system of the characteristics has the form @xmath45 @xmath46
let us investigate how amplitudes of short wavelength change at the above mentioned evolution of the wf .
equations for @xmath27 and @xmath47 follow from ( [ doc11 ] ) @xmath48 where @xmath49 this system is an essentially non - linear one since co
- factors of @xmath27 and @xmath47 in the right hand sides of the equations depend on @xmath17 , too . however , the presence of the large parameter @xmath50 allows finding a solution . following from the system ( [ doc18 ] ) , the equation for the generalized momenta @xmath27 is @xmath51 where @xmath52 . here
@xmath53 is an unknown function according to eq .
( [ doc18 ] ) .
it is easy to show that the following solution @xmath54 satisfies the last equation with the high accuracy of @xmath55 . and
correspondingly , @xmath56 where @xmath57 is an arbitrary constant , and the phase of the solution is chosen from the requirement of amplitude finiteness at @xmath58 .
the mentioned accuracy of solutions requires the assumption that the logarithmic derivative @xmath59 does not give a large parameter @xmath14 .
the last statement follows from the fact that each mode of wave enters into eq .
( [ doc18 ] ) for @xmath60 as a term @xmath61 it is clear from substitution eqs .
( [ doc20 ] ) , ( [ doc21 ] ) in ( [ doc22 ] ) . with taking into account ( [ doc22 ] ) after rewriting of the amplitude @xmath62
, we have for @xmath60 the following expression @xmath63},\ ] ] further , we suppose that @xmath64 and we have in the superpotential @xmath65.\ ] ] values of @xmath30 and @xmath60 define an action of wf @xmath66 according to the system of characteristics ( [ doc11 ] ) . because of the large number of short waves , the sum in eq .
( [ doc22b ] ) can be taken as fast oscillations average with an adequate accuracy .
then the expression for the superpotential gets the form @xmath67,\ ] ] the existence of an inner classically available region requires a realization of the condition @xmath68 in the mentioned interval @xmath69 .
( let us remember see eq .
( [ doc6 ] ) that the total energy @xmath70 vanishes for the closed universe . )
the potential barrier should begin at @xmath71 , i. e. @xmath72 at @xmath73 .
let us notice that the vanishing of the factor ordering parameter ( @xmath74 ) allows us to get an inner classically available region only at the expense of the sum @xmath75 .
but in that case , a potential barrier necessary for a further development is absent .
so , we choose the factor ordering @xmath76 in the following .
owing to the amplitude of short waves begin to increase quickly under the barrier , we assume that their total energy is negligible in the considered region @xmath68 , and the evolution of the universe is determined only by the first two terms in the r.h.s .
( [ doc22c ] ) . in this case
the dynamics of the amplitudes of the short waves can be given explicitly .
the phase in eq .
( [ doc20 ] ) is @xmath77 here , @xmath78 can be obtained from the condition @xmath79
= 0,\qquad a_0=\frac{1}{2}.\ ] ] a case when the total energy of the modes is not negligible in the expressions for @xmath30 and @xmath60 can be similarly considered .
but then the final expression becomes essentially complicated .
the superpotential @xmath30 is positive at @xmath80 .
this means that the evolution of the wf occurs under the barrier . at this range ,
the problem is defined by the system of characteristics ( [ doc13 ] ) , and we have for @xmath27 the following equation @xmath81 this equation has an inverse sign at first term on the right in comparison with eq .
( [ doc19 ] ) for the classically allowed region .
it changes the solution in principle , but for a large parameter @xmath50 we can find a solution by a method similar to the one used for eq .
( [ doc19 ] ) @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 here the conditions of continuity of @xmath27 and @xmath47 at the point @xmath71 were used for the selection of the constants of integration .
both in section 3 and here , the correctness of the solution ( [ doc22e ] ) is determined by the requirement of @xmath85 .
this requirement is checked by substituting of the obtained solution in @xmath86 of eq .
( [ doc13 ] ) .
there @xmath87 in the last formula the term containing the factor ordering , that plays a part only close to zero , is ignored .
because of the smallness of the sum @xmath88 under the barrier this term can be neglected in the expression for @xmath86 , and we suppose with a necessary accuracy @xmath89 at that @xmath17 the phase @xmath90 has the form @xmath91 and leaving only growing modes in solutions at @xmath80 we obtain @xmath92 in that solution the amplitude of short waves catastrophically increases with growth of @xmath14 but not under the exponential law .
the latter is realized in the case of a slow variation of @xmath86 in eq .
( [ doc22e ] ) .
it is similar to the rubakov - effect of catastrophic particle creation , see ref .
@xcite . a final value of an amplification of the amplitude of short waves is determined by a time " of the wf stay under the barrier .
let us notice that we consider a self - consistent problem of amplification of short waves ( an analogue of particle creation ) .
it means that the energy of the increasing modes under the barrier controls the form of the barrier itself ( see fig .
( 50,160 ) ( -200,-280 ) let us consider the equation for the action of the wf under the barrier ( [ doc13 ] ) @xmath93 only a potential " energy of increasing modes is present in the superpotential @xmath30 , but here again it is not cancelled by their kinetic " energy as it was realized in ( [ doc * ] ) .
as it follows from @xmath94 , an external boundary of the tunneling region is determined by the equation @xmath95 the final value of amplification of the amplitude of the modes is defined by substitution of @xmath96 in eq .
( [ doc * * ] ) .
further , the euclidean action @xmath97 has a form @xmath98 subject to @xmath99 we have @xmath100 .
hence , a probability of tunneling of the wf through the barrier is given as @xmath101 at @xmath102 .
the formula @xmath103 is more exact in the case @xmath104 .
the self - consistent problem of the evolution of the closed friedmann universe with an amplification of wave perturbations of a scalar field under a barrier is considered . within the framework of a semiclassical approximation of the wheeler - dewitt equation
it is shown that the increase of the amplitude of short waves under the barrier controls the barrier shape , i.e. leads to both a reduction of the barrier and fast output of wf from under the barrier . in this sense
the problem is self - consistent .
the process of tunneling and the increase of the amplitudes of short waves is defined here by the assignment of their initial spectrum in the inner classically allowed region .
if it is required after tunneling in the universe to receive a spectrum close to the flat one , the initial spectrum should be almost exponentially suppressed in the area @xmath105 .
it is qualitatively equivalent to the presence of an effective temperature in the inner classically allowed region .
the authors thank a. a. starobinsky and m. v. sazhin for information about papers of v. a. rubakov et al . and
h. kleinert for useful comments .
.- j.s . acknowledges financial support from the hsp iii - program .
the work is done within the project kr-154 of the international science and technology centre ( istc ) .
a. d. linde , `` elementary particle physics and inflationary cosmology '' , nauka , main editorial board for physical and mathematical literature , moscow , 1990 .
landau , e.m .
livshits , mechanics " .
nauka , main editorial board for physical and mathematical literature , moscow , 1988 .
e. kamke , the reference book on differential partial equations of the first order " .
nauka , moscow , 1966 .
gurovich , u. m. imanaliev and i. v.tokareva , _ jetp lett _ * 64 * , no.5 , 329 ( 1996 ) . m. bachmann and h .- j .
schmidt , gr - qc/9912068 , phys .
d in press . v. folomeev and v. gurovich , gen .
* 32 * ( 2000 ) in press .
rubakov , _ pisma
zh.eksp . teor
* 39 * , no . 2 , 89 - 92 ( 1984 ) .
lavrelashvili , v.a .
rubakov and p.g .
tenyakov , _ nuclear physics _ * b299 * , no . 2 , 757 - 796 ( 1988 ) .
|
present basic equations problem space - time closed cosmological friedmann models metric @xmath0 @xmath1 action assumed @xmath2\sqrt{-g}\omega @xmath3 scalar curvature @xmath4 potential scalar quantum field mass @xmath5 @xmath7 cosmological @xmath8 - term equation @xmath9 form @xmath10 set scalar field radial standing waves time - dependent amplitudes @xmath11 functions @xmath12 singularities poles @xmath13 integer numbers @xmath14 orthonormal on coordinate @xmath15 measure defined metric @xmath16 action doc2 integrated over angular variables rewrite after replacement @xmath3 value @xmath17 as @xmath18dt, @xmath19 redefinitions @xmath20 @xmath21 front integral free of constants formula point denotes derivative @xmath22 @xmath23 waves wavelength comparable diameter universe negligible for dynamics waves packet @xmath24 ensures homogeneity model during expansion high accuracyintroduction generalized momenta hamiltonian function presented as @xmath25 @xmath26 generalized momentum coordinate for universe @xmath27 @xmath28 same for each radial mode field wheeler - dewitt equation for wave function universe form @xmath29 superpotential @xmath30 as @xmath31 neglecting @xmath32 sum residual in eq @xmath23 justified short - wavelength approximation mass particles influence factor ordering parameter @xmath33 @xcite introduced in eq solution of equation in semiclassical approximation @xmath34 @xmath35 classical action @xmath36 nonlinear equation first order similar to hamilton - jacobi equation analytical mechanics solution complete integral @xcite found from system of characteristic equations solution for @xmath37 scale factor becomes argument along characteristics @xmath38 @xmath30 @xmath39 evolution of wf @xmath40 along characteristic turning points roots of @xmath41 separate classically available forbidden regions along characteristic eq similar approach for strongly anisotropic wf in bianchi type i model presented in ref .@xcite closed friedmann model ref @xcite region under barrier semiclassical solution found by ansatz form @xmath42 equation @xmath43 obtained from eq changing @xmath44 distinct from eq system characteristics form @xmath45 @xmath46 investigate amplitudes short wavelength change evolution wf equations for @xmath27 @xmath47 follow from @xmath48 @xmath49 system non - linear co - factors of @xmath27 @xmath47 depend on @xmath17 presence large parameter @xmath50 allows solution equation for generalized momenta @xmath27 is @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 unknown function according eq . solution @xmath54 satisfies last equation high accuracy of @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 arbitrary constant phase solution chosen from requirement amplitude finiteness at @xmath58 accuracy solutions requires assumption logarithmic derivative @xmath59 give large parameter @xmath14 each mode of wave enters into eq . @xmath60 term @xmath61 clear from substitution eqs . doc20 doc21 doc22[ doc22 ] ) rewriting amplitude @xmath62 @xmath60 expression @xmath63}, suppose @xmath64 superpotential @xmath65. values @xmath30 @xmath60 define action wf @xmath66 system characteristics [ doc11 ] large number short waves sum in eq . doc22b ] fast oscillations average adequate accuracy expression superpotential form @xmath67, inner classically available region requires realization condition @xmath68 interval @xmath69 doc6 total energy @xmath70 vanishes closed universe potential barrier at @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 vanishing factor ordering parameter @xmath74 ) allows inner classically available region expense sum @xmath75 potential barrier further development absent choose factor ordering @xmath76 amplitude short waves increase under barrier total energy negligible in region @xmath68 evolution universe determined by first two terms r.h.s . [ doc22c ] dynamics amplitudes short waves given explicitly phase in eq . doc20 ] @xmath77 @xmath78 obtained from condition @xmath79 = 0, a_0=\frac{1}{2}.case total energy modes not negligible in expressions @xmath30 and @xmath60 considered final expression complicated superpotential @xmath30 positive at @xmath80 evolution wf occurs under barrier problem defined by system of characteristics doc13 for @xmath27 equation @xmath81 inverse sign at first term with eq doc19 classically allowed region changes solution principle for large parameter @xmath50 solution by method similar to eq @xmath82 @xmath83 @xmath84 conditions of continuity of @xmath27 @xmath47 @xmath71 used for selection constants of integration correctness of solution determined by requirement of @xmath85 checked by substituting obtained solution in @xmath86 of eq @xmath87 last formula term factor ordering ignored smallness of sum @xmath88 under barrier term neglected in expression for @xmath86 @xmath89 @xmath17 phase @xmath90 has form @xmath91 growing modes in solutions at @xmath80 obtain @xmath92 amplitude of short waves increases with growth of @xmath14 not under exponential law realized slow variation of @xmath86 in eq doc22esimilar to rubakov - effect catastrophic particle creation @xcite final value amplification amplitude short waves determined by time wf stay under barrier self - consistent problem of amplification short waves analogue particle creation energy increasing modes under barrier controls form barrier fig . ( 50,160 ) -200,-280 ) equation for action wf under barrier doc13 @xmath93 potential energy increasing modes present in superpotential @xmath30 not cancelled by kinetic energy external boundary tunneling region determined by equation @xmath95 final value amplification amplitude modes defined by substitution @xmath96 eq . euclidean action @xmath97 has form @xmath98 subject to @xmath99 @xmath100 probability of tunneling wf through barrier given as @xmath101 @xmath102 formula @xmath103 exact @xmath104 self - consistent problem evolution closed friedmann universe with amplification wave perturbations scalar field under barrier wheeler - dewitt equation increase amplitude short waves under barrier controls barrier shape leads to reduction barrier fast output wf problem self - consistenttunneling increase amplitudes short waves defined by assignment initial spectrum inner classically allowed region if required after tunneling receive spectrum close to flat initial spectrum suppressed in area @xmath105 equivalent to effective temperature inner classically allowed region authors thank a. starobinsky sazhin for information rubakov h. kleinert comments acknowledges financial support hsp iii - program work within project kr-154 international science technology centre d. linde elementary particle physics inflationary cosmology 1990 landau livshits mechanics 1988 kamke reference book differential partial equations 1966 gurovich imanaliev v.tokareva jetp lett _ * 64 * , no.5 , 329 ( 1996 ) bachmann schmidt gr - qc/9912068 phys . d press v. folomeev v. gurovich gen . * 32 * ( 2000 ) press rubakov pisma zh.eksp teor * 39 * no 2 , 89 - 92 ( 1984 ) lavrelashvili rubakov tenyakov nuclear physics b299757 - 796 1988
| 0.501042
| 3,032
| 1,578
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,248
|
a @xmath0-periodic 3-manifold is a 3-manifold that admits a @xmath1-action whose fixed point set is a circle .
we give a congruence that relates the quantum invariant of a @xmath0-periodic 3-manifold associated to any modular category over an integrally closed ground ring and the corresponding quantum invariant of its orbit space .
|
let @xmath0 be an odd prime , and let @xmath2 be the finite cyclic group @xmath1 .
we assume that all 3-manifolds are compact and closed .
the quantum invariant of a 3-manifold can be defined using any modular category . in @xcite , gilmer was interested in studying the relation between the @xmath3- invariants of @xmath0-periodic 3-manifolds and their quotient manifolds .
he obtained a congruence relating these invariants .
his result was obtained by using the trace formula of topological quantum field theory ( see proposition ( [ p : t ] ) ) and studying gaussian sums .
chbili used the results about the jones polynomial and the kauffman multi - bracket of @xmath0-periodic links to obtain a similar result for rational homology 3-spheres for the @xmath4-invariants in @xcite .
also in @xcite , he gave similar results for the @xmath5 and the moo - invariants .
moreover in @xcite , chen and le generalized the above results for rational homology spheres using any complex simple lie algebra .
we give similar results for all 3-manifolds using any modular category over an integrally closed ground ring .
our proof takes place completely in the context of modular categories .
we use the surgery descriptions of @xmath0-periodic 3-manifold and its orbit manifold , obtained in @xcite , to prove the result . in section [ 1 ] , we give a brief exposition on how to calculate the quantum invariant for any 3-manifold from its surgery description . in section
[ 2 ] , we discuss the @xmath1-actions on 3-manifolds and the relation between the link that describes a @xmath0-periodic 3-manifold and the link that describes its orbit manifold . some formulas and results regarding the value of colored ribbon graphs under the covariant functor @xmath6
will be given in section [ 3 ] .
finally in section [ 4 ] , we state and prove the main result .
fix a strict modular category ( @xmath7,@xmath8 ) with ground ring @xmath9 and a rank @xmath10 .
a result due to lickorish and wallace asserts that every closed oriented 3-manifold can be obtained by surgery on @xmath11 along a framed link .
let @xmath13 be a closed oriented 3-manifold obtained by surgery on @xmath11 along a framed link @xmath14 .
the @xmath12-invariant of @xmath15 associated to ( @xmath16 ) where @xmath17 is a colored ribbon graph in @xmath13 is given by @xmath18 here @xmath19 is the signature of the linking matrix of the link @xmath14 , and @xmath20 is the number of components of @xmath14 , and @xmath21 where @xmath22 denotes the diagram for the unknot with a single double point and writhe -1 .
we use the notation @xmath23 where col(@xmath14 ) is the set of all mappings from the set of components of @xmath14 to @xmath24 ( the set of simple objects ) , and @xmath25 is the ribbon graph obtained by coloring the @xmath26-th component of @xmath14 by @xmath27 . here
@xmath6 is the covariant functor defined in ( * ? ? ?
* chapter.i ) which assigns to a @xmath7-colored ribbon graph in @xmath28 an element of the ground ring .
the material of this section is due to turaev @xcite .
we take the definition of the quantum invariant to be as follows @xmath29 our result is simpler when expressed using this normalization .
[ t : t][turaev ] @xmath30 ( or @xmath31 ) is a topological invariant of the pair @xmath15 .
* example .
* we know that @xmath11 is obtained by doing surgery on the empty link , i.e @xmath32 .
also , @xmath11 is obtained by doing surgery along the hopf link @xmath33 with framing 0 on both components .
hence , we conclude @xmath34 . @xmath35 is invariant under kirby sliding .
this corollary is really major part of proof of theorem ( [ t : t ] ) .
finally , the @xmath12-invariant can be recovered in terms of the tqft - theory @xmath36 which is a functor from the category @xmath37 whose objects are closed surfaces and 3-manifolds as its morphisms ( the surfaces and 3-manifolds have banded links sitting inside of them ) to the category of @xmath9-modules and @xmath9-linear homomorphisms , where @xmath38 is the functor on the surfaces and @xmath39 is the functor on 3-manifolds . in fact , the assigned value of a closed 3-manifold under @xmath39 is a scalar multiplication homomorphism from the base ring to itself and that scalar is the @xmath12-invariant of that manifold . for more details of tqft see ( @xcite )
let @xmath13 be a closed oriented 3-manifold that is a result of surgery on @xmath11 along the framed link @xmath14 .
a framed link @xmath14 in @xmath11 is said to be @xmath0-periodic if there exists a @xmath1-action on @xmath11 , with a fixed point set equal to a circle , that maps @xmath14 to itself under this action and @xmath14 is assumed to be disjoint from the circle .
@xmath13 is said to be @xmath0-periodic if there is an orientation preserving @xmath1-action with fixed point set equal to a circle , and the action is free outside this circle .
now we list the following two results from @xcite that will be used in later sections .
[ t : nonfree ] there is a @xmath1-action on @xmath13 with a fixed point set equal to a circle iff @xmath13 can be obtained be as a result of surgery on a @xmath0-periodic link @xmath14 and @xmath1 acts freely on the set of the components of @xmath14 . by the positive solution of the smith conjecture
, we can represent any framed @xmath0-periodic link as a closure of some graph such that the rotation of this graph about the @xmath40-axis in @xmath41 ( or the circle in @xmath11 ) by 2@xmath42 leaves it invariant , i.e @xmath43 ( where the bar means the closure of the graph ) see figure [ f : figure1 ] .
+ let @xmath44 denote the orbit space , then @xmath45 is obtained by surgery on @xmath11 along the link @xmath46 .
[ l : basic ] let @xmath14 a @xmath0-periodic link in @xmath11 .
the following are equivalent 1 .
@xmath1 acts freely on the set of components of @xmath14 ; 2 .
the linking number of each component of the @xmath47 the axis of the action is congruent to zero modulo @xmath0 ; 3 .
the number of components of @xmath14 is equal to @xmath0 times the number of components of @xmath47 .
we use two different notions of trace one is the trace of a linear homomorphism ( denoted by @xmath48 ) in the category of @xmath9-modules and the other one is the trace of a ribbon graph ( denoted by @xmath49 ) in the category of ribbon graphs defined in ( * ? ? ? * chapter.1 ) [ p : t ] @xmath50 where @xmath17 is a colored ribbon @xmath51 tangle in @xmath52 .
this is a special case of the trace formula for tqft ( * ? ? ?
* prop.1.2 ) and ( * ? ? ?
* ex.2.8.1 ) .
[ l : newtrace ] @xmath53 let @xmath33 stands for the zero - framed hopf link on both components .
we have @xmath54{t94}}\\ & = \frac{1}{\{h\}}\sum_{\lambda \in col(h ) } \{h\}_{\lambda } f(\overline{\omega } ) \ , \quad \text{as}\ \{h\ } = \sum_{\lambda\in col(l ) } \{h\}\\ & = \frac{1}{\mathcal{d}^{2}}\sum_{\lambda \in col(h ) } \dim(\lambda)f(\overline{\omega}\cup h)\ , \quad\text{as}\ \{h\ } = \mathcal{d}^{2},\ \text{where } \ h \
\text{is unlinked from}\ \overline{\omega } \\ & = \frac{1}{\mathcal{d}^{2}}\sum_{\lambda \in col(h ) } \dim(\lambda)f(\overline{\omega^ { ' } } ) \ , \quad \substack{\text{using the invariance of } \ \{l,\omega\ } \ \\ \text{under sliding see figure}\ref{f : figure2 } } \\ & = \sum_{i
\in i } \dim(v_{i})\mathcal{d}^{-2}\sum_{j \in i}\dim(v_{j } ) f ( \overline{\omega^{'}})\\ & = \sum_{i \in i } \dim(v_{i } ) \tau(s^{2}\times s^{1},\overline{1_{v_{i}}\otimes \omega})\ , \quad \text{by formula ( \ref{e : rtc } ) } \\ & = \sum_{i \in i } \dim(v_{i } ) \operatorname{trace}_{v(s^{2},l+1)}(z_{(s^{2}\times i,{1_{v_{i}}\otimes \omega})})\ , \quad \text{by proposition ( \ref{p : t } ) } \end{split}\ ] ] obtained by sliding @xmath55 over the hopf link using the second kirby move , title="fig:",width=288 ] + let @xmath56 be the ideal generated by @xmath0 and @xmath57 in @xmath9 .
[ c : trace ] let @xmath17 be any colored ribbon graph over any modular category with integrally closed ground ring .
then @xmath58 if we assume @xmath59 it follows that @xmath60 hence the result follows from lemma ( [ l : newtrace ] ) and ( * ? ? ?
* lem.3.5(i ) ) , which implies that @xmath61^{p } \quad \pmod { p},\ ] ] where @xmath39 is an endomorphism of free @xmath9-module .
let @xmath13 be a 3-manifold that admits a @xmath1-action with a fixed point set equal to a circle .
then we are in situation of theorem [ t : nonfree ] .
i.e. @xmath13 is obtained by surgery on @xmath11 along a framed @xmath0-periodic link @xmath14 ( see figure [ f : figure1 ] ) .
we would like to relate the quantum invariant of @xmath13 to the quantum invariant of @xmath44 .
before we do so , we introduce the following .
let @xmath14 be a @xmath0-periodic link , and @xmath62 be a coloring of @xmath14 .
if @xmath25 is invariant under the rotation of the graph that represents @xmath14 by 2@xmath42 , then @xmath62 is called a @xmath0-periodic coloring .
let us start with any coloring of @xmath14 say @xmath62 , either @xmath62 is @xmath0-periodic or not .
let us assume that @xmath62 is not @xmath0-periodic , i.e @xmath25 is not invariant under the rotation by 2@xmath42 about the @xmath40-axis .
hence the @xmath26-th rotation of @xmath25 ( the rotation by @xmath64 ) represents a ribbon graph with the same value under @xmath6 ( since @xmath6 is an isotopy invariant ) and different coloring denoted by @xmath65 .
so the term with a non - periodic coloring occurs @xmath0 times .
hence we reduce the summation on the left - hand side to the periodic colorings .
now the result follows from corollary ( [ c : trace ] ) and the fact that the periodic colorings of @xmath14 are in one - to - one correspondence with the colorings of @xmath47(by restriction ) .
suppose @xmath9 is a knot in a homology sphere @xmath45 .
let @xmath73 be the @xmath0-fold cyclic cover branched along @xmath9 .
it is known that , we can extend this cover to a cover @xmath74 of 4-manifolds ( where @xmath75 and @xmath76 ) branching over the surface @xmath77 .
let @xmath78 denote the self - intersection of @xmath77 in @xmath79 using the framing on @xmath9 obtained from any seifert surface for @xmath9 in @xmath45 . in this case
, we define the total signature @xmath80 @xmath81 by a well - known argument , using novikov additivity and the @xmath2-signature theory @xcite , @xmath80 is independent of the choices made .
the linking matrix of @xmath14 describes the intersection form on 4-manifold with boundary @xmath13 which is a branched cover along a disk with zero self - intersection in a 4-manifold with boundary @xmath45 .
the corollary now follows by identifying @xmath68 with the total signature of @xmath9 .
the results of this paper were obtained during my ph.d .
studies at louisiana state university .
i would like to express deep gratitude to my advisor dr.patrick gilmer whose comments and support were very important for the completion of this project .
w c. blanchet , n. habegger , g. masbaum , and p. vogel , _ topological quantum field theories derived from the kauffman bracket _ , topology * 34 * ( 1995 ) , 883 - 927 . n. chbili , _ quantum invariants of finite group actions on three manifolds _ , topology and its applications * 136 * ( 2004 ) , 219 - 231 . n. chbili , _ les invariants @xmath84 des 3-vari@xmath85t@xmath85s p@xmath85riodiques _ , ann .
fourier * 51*(2001 ) 1135 - 1150
. q. chen , t. le , _ quantum invariants of periodic links and periodic 3-manifolds _ , fund .
* 184 * ( 2004 ) , 5571 .
m. gilmer , _ quantum invariants of periodic three - manifolds _ , geometry and topology monographs * 2 * ( 1999 ) , 157175 .
m. gilmer , j. kania - bartoszynska , and j. h. przytycki , _
3-manifold invariants and periodicity of homology spheres _ , algebraic and geometric topology * 2 * ( 2002 ) , 825842 . l. kauffman , _ on knots _ , number 115 , annals of mathematics studies , princeton university press , 1987
. j. h. przytycki and m. v. sokolov , _ surgeries on periodic links and homology of periodic 3-manifolds _ , math .
soc * 131 * ( 2001 ) , 295307 .
|
@xmath0 odd prime @xmath2 finite cyclic group @xmath1 all 3-manifolds compact closed quantum invariant 3-manifold defined modular category @xcite gilmer relation @xmath3- invariants @xmath0-periodic 3-manifolds quotient manifolds obtained congruence result trace formula topological quantum field theory gaussian sums chbili used results jones polynomial kauffman multi - bracket @xmath0-periodic links similar result rational homology 3-spheres @xmath4-invariants @xcite similar results @xmath5 moo - invariants chen le generalized results rational homology spheres complex simple lie algebra similar results all 3-manifolds modular category integrally closed ground ring proof context modular categories surgery descriptions @xmath0-periodic 3-manifold orbit manifold @xcite prove result section [ 1 ] calculate quantum invariant 3-manifold surgery description section [ 2 ] @xmath1-actions on 3-manifolds relation link @xmath0-periodic 3-manifold orbit manifold formulas results value colored ribbon graphs covariant functor @xmath6 section [ 3 ] section [ 4 ] prove main resultfix modular category @xmath7 ground ring @xmath9 rank @xmath10 result lickorish wallace asserts closed oriented 3-manifold obtained surgery @xmath11 framed link @xmath13 closed oriented 3-manifold obtained surgery @xmath11 framed link @xmath14 @xmath12-invariant @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 colored ribbon graph @xmath13 @xmath18 @xmath19 signature linking matrix @xmath14 @xmath20 number components @xmath14 @xmath21 @xmath22 diagram unknot single double point writhe -1 notation @xmath23 col(@xmath14 set mappings components @xmath14 to @xmath24 @xmath25 ribbon graph coloring @xmath26-th component @xmath14 @xmath27 @xmath6 covariant functor chapter assigns @xmath7-colored ribbon graph @xmath28 element ground ring material section due turaev @xcite definition quantum invariant @xmath29 result simpler expressed normalization @xmath30 @xmath31 topological invariant pair @xmath15 @xmath11 obtained surgery empty link @xmath32 @xmath11 surgery hopf link @xmath33 framing 0 both componentsconclude @xmath34 @xmath35 invariant under kirby sliding corollary major part of proof of theorem @xmath12-invariant recovered tqft - theory @xmath36 functor from category @xmath37 closed surfaces 3-manifolds @xmath9-modules @xmath9-linear homomorphisms @xmath38 functor on surfaces @xmath39 on 3-manifolds assigned value of closed 3-manifold under @xmath39 is scalar multiplication homomorphism from base ring scalar @xmath12-invariant manifold details @xmath13 closed oriented 3-manifold result of surgery on @xmath11 framed link @xmath14 framed link @xmath14 @xmath11 @xmath0-periodic if @xmath1-action on @xmath11 fixed point equal to circle maps @xmath14 disjoint from circle @xmath13 @xmath0-periodic if orientation preserving @xmath1-action fixed point set equal to circle action free outside circle list two results from @xcite used in later sectionsnonfree @xmath1-action on @xmath13 fixed point equal circle obtained surgery on @xmath0-periodic link @xmath14 @xmath1 acts on components @xmath14 positive solution smith conjecture represent framed @xmath0-periodic link as closure of graph rotation about @xmath40-axis in @xmath41 circle @xmath11@xmath42 leaves invariant @xmath43 bar means closure graph figure figure1 @xmath44 orbit space @xmath45 obtained by surgery on @xmath11 link @xmath46 basic @xmath14 @xmath0-periodic link in @xmath11 equivalent @xmath1 acts freely on components @xmath14 linking number of each component @xmath47 axis action congruent to zero modulo @xmath0 number of components of @xmath14 equal to @xmath0 times number components @xmath47 two notions of trace linear homomorphism @xmath48 ) @xmath9-modules ribbon graph @xmath49 ) ribbon graphs chapter.1 @xmath50 @xmath17 colored ribbon @xmath51 tangle in @xmath52 special case of trace formula for tqft prop.1.2 ) ex.2.8.1newtrace @xmath53 zero - framed hopf link components@xmath54{t94}}\\\frac{1}{\{h\sum_{\lambda col(h\overline{\omega\quad \text{as}\{h \sum_{\lambda col(l ) \frac{1}{\mathcal{d}^{2}}\sum{\lambda col(h )(\lambda)f(\overline{\omega}\quad\text{as}\{h\ \mathcal{d}^{2}\text unlinked\overline{\omega } \frac{1}{\mathcal{d}^{2}}\sum_{\lambda col(h )(\lambda)f(\overline{\omega\substack{\text invariance\{l,\omega\\text{under sliding figure}{f figure2 } \sum_{i (v_{i})\mathcal{d}^{-2}\sum_{j (v_{j\overline{\omega^{'}} \sum_{i (v_{i(s^{2} s^{1},\overline{1_{v_{i}} \omega}\quad \text{by formula\ref{e rtc } \sum_\in\dim(v_{i } )\operatorname{trace}{v(s^{2},l+1)}(z_^{2} i,{1_{v_{i}} \omega}}\text proposition\ref{p : t } ){split} obtained sliding @xmath55 over hopf link second kirby move title="fig:",width=288 @xmath56 ideal generated by @xmath0 @xmath57 @xmath9 trace @xmath17 colored ribbon graph modular category closed ground ring @xmath58 @xmath59 follows @xmath60 result follows lemma newtrace lem.3.5(i implies @xmath61^{p \pmod { p} @xmath39 endomorphism @xmath9-module @xmath13 3-manifold @xmath1-action fixed point circle situation theorem nonfree @xmath13 obtained surgery @xmath11 framed @xmath0-periodic link @xmath14 figure figure1 relate quantum invariant @xmath13 to @xmath44 @xmath14 @xmath0-periodic link @xmath62 coloring of @xmath14@xmath25 invariant under rotation graph @xmath14 2@xmath42 @xmath62 @xmath0-periodic coloring start coloring @xmath14 @xmath62-periodic assume @xmath62 not-periodic @xmath25 not invariant under rotation 2@xmath42 @xmath40-axis @xmath26-th rotation @xmath25 @xmath64 represents ribbon graph same value under @xmath6 isotopy invariant different coloring @xmath65 non - periodic coloring occurs @xmath0 times reduce summation left - hand side to periodic colorings result periodic colorings @xmath14 one - - correspondence with colorings @xmath47 @xmath9 knot in homology sphere @xmath45 @xmath73 @xmath0-fold cyclic cover branched along @xmath9 extend cover to @xmath74 4-manifolds @xmath75 @xmath76 over surface @xmath77 @xmath78 self - intersection @xmath77 in @xmath79 framing @xmath9 surface @xmath9 @xmath45 define total signature @xmath80 @xmath81 novikov additivity @xmath2-signature theory @xmath80 independent of choiceslinking matrix @xmath14 describes intersection form 4-manifold @xmath13 branched cover disk zero self - intersection 4-manifold @xmath45 corollary @xmath68 signature @xmath9 results obtained ph.d studies louisiana state university gratitude advisor dr.patrick gilmer comments support important completion blanchet habegger masbaum vogel topological quantum field theories kauffman bracket topology 34 1995 ) 883 - 927. chbili quantum invariants finite group actions three manifolds topology 136 2004 ) , 219 - 231 invariants @xmath84 3-vari@xmath85t fourier 51(2001 ) 1135 - 1150 chen t le quantum invariants periodic links 3-manifolds 184 2004 ), 5571 gilmer quantum invariants periodic three - manifolds geometry topology monographs 2 1999 ) 157175 gilmer bartoszynska przytycki 3-manifold invariants periodicity homology spheres algebraic geometric topology 2 2002 ) 825842 kauffman knots 115 annals mathematics studies princeton university press 1987 przytyckisokolov surgeries periodic links homology 3-manifolds math soc 131 2001 295307
| 0.6067
| 3,567
| 2,002
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,249
|
in a recent paper by lasseux , valds - parada and porter ( j. fluid mech . * 805 * ( 2016 ) 118 - 146 ) , it is found that the apparent gas permeability of the porous media is a nonlinear function of the knudsen number . however , this result is highly questionable , because the adopted navier - stokes equations and the first - order velocity - slip boundary condition are first - order ( in terms of the knudsen number ) approximations of the boltzmann equation and the kinetic boundary condition for rarefied gas flows .
our numerical simulations based on the bhatnagar - gross - krook kinetic equation and regularized 20-moment equations prove that the navier - stokes equations with the first - order velocity - slip boundary condition are only accurate at a very small knudsen number limit , where the apparent gas permeability is a linear function of the knudsen number .
authors should not insert the keywords
|
the permeability of porous media is an important parameter to predict the unconventional gas production . for laminar flows in highly permeable porous media ,
the darcy s law states that the volume flow rate @xmath0 is proportional to the pressure gradient @xmath1 : @xmath2 where @xmath3 is the cross - section area of the flow , @xmath4 is the shear viscosity of the fluid , and @xmath5 is the permeability of a porous medium that is independent of the fluid . for this reason , @xmath5
is known as the intrinsic permeability . for gas flows in low permeable porous media , however , the measured permeability is larger than the intrinsic permeability and increases with the reciprocal mean gas pressure @xmath6 @xcite . in order to distinguish it from the intrinsic permeability , the permeability
is called the apparent permeability @xmath7 , which can be expressed as : @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the correction factor .
the variation of the apparent permeability with respect to the mean gas pressure is due to the rarefaction effects , where infrequent collisions between gas molecules not only cause the gas slippage at the solid surface , but also modify the constitution relation between the stress and strain - rate @xcite .
the extent of rarefaction is characterized by the knudsen number @xmath10 ( i.e. the ratio of the mean free path @xmath11 of gas molecules to the characteristic flow length @xmath12 ) : @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the shear viscosity of the gas at a reference temperature @xmath15 , and @xmath16 is the gas constant .
gas flows can be classified into four regimes ; for gas flows in porous media , the region of @xmath10 for different flow regimes may change . ] : continuum flow @xmath17 in which navier - stokes equations ( nses ) can be used ; slip flow @xmath18 where nses with appropriate velocity - slip / temperature - jump boundary conditions may be used ; transition flow @xmath19 and free - molecular flow @xmath20 , where nses break down and the boltzmann equation is used to describe rarefied gas flows @xcite .
recently , based on nses with the first - order velocity - slip boundary condition ( fvbc ) , @xcite found that the apparent gas permeability of the porous media is a nonlinear function of @xmath10 .
this result , however , is questionable , because the nses were used beyond its validity . through our theoretical analysis and numerical calculations ,
we show that nses with fvbc can only predict the apparent permeability of porous media to the first - order accuracy of @xmath10 .
consider a gas flowing through the periodic porous media .
suppose the geometry along the @xmath21-direction is uniform and infinite , the gas flow is effectively two - dimensional and can be studied in a unit rectangular cell abcd , with appropriate governing equations and boundary conditions ; one example of the porous medium consisting of a periodic array of discs is shown in fig .
we are interested in how the apparent permeability varies with the knudsen number .
the boltzmann equation is fundamental in the study of rarefied gas dynamics from the continuum to the free - molecular flow regimes , which uses the distribution function @xmath22 to describe the system state : @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the three - dimensional molecular velocity normalized by the most probable speed @xmath25 , @xmath26 is the spatial coordinate normalized by the length @xmath12 of the side ab , @xmath27 is the time normalized by @xmath28 , @xmath29 is normalized by @xmath30 , while @xmath31 is the boltzmann collision operator . in order to save the computational cost ,
@xmath31 is usually replaced by the relaxation - time approximation @xcite , resulting in the bhatnagar - gross - krook ( bgk ) equation .
numerical simulation for the poiseuille flow between two parallel plates shows that the bgk equation can yield accurate mass flow rates when the gas flow is not in the free - molecular regime @xcite .
when the porous medium is so long that the pressure gradient is small , the bgk equation can be linearized .
the distribution function is expressed as @xmath32 , where @xmath33 is the equilibrium distribution function , and the perturbation @xmath34 is governed by @xcite : @xmath35,\ ] ] where macroscopic quantities such as the perturbed density @xmath36 , the velocity @xmath37 and @xmath38 , and the perturbed temperature @xmath39 are calculated as @xmath40 the kinetic equation has to be supplied with the boundary condition .
suppose the pressure gradient is along the @xmath41 direction , on the inlet and outlet of the computational domain abcd ( the coordinates of the four corners a , b , c , and d are @xmath42 , and @xmath43 , respectively ) , the pressure gradient is applied and the periodic condition for the flow velocity is used @xcite : @xmath44 at the lines ab and cd , the specular reflection boundary condition is used to account for the symmetry : @xmath45 when @xmath46 , and @xmath47 when @xmath48 , while at the solid surface , the diffuse boundary condition is used @xcite : @xmath49 where @xmath50 is the normal velocity vector at the solid surface .
the apparent gas permeability , which is normalized by @xmath51 , is calculated by @xmath52 historically , the state of a gas is first described by macroscopic quantities such as the density @xmath53 , velocity @xmath54 , and temperature @xmath55 ; and its dynamics is described by the euler equations or nses ( based on the empirical newton s law for stress and the fourier s law for heat flux ) .
these equations , however , can be derived rigorously from the boltzmann equation , at various order of approximations . by taking the velocity moments of the boltzmann equation ,
the five macroscopic quantities are governed by the following equations : @xmath56 however , the above equations are not closed , since expressions for the shear stress @xmath57 and heat flux @xmath58 are not known .
one way to close - is to use the chapman - enskog expansion , where the distribution function is expressed in the power series of @xmath10 @xcite : @xmath59 where @xmath60 is the equilibrium maxwellian distribution function .
when @xmath61 , we have @xmath62 , and - reduce to the euler equations . when the distribution function is truncated at the first - order of @xmath10 , that is , @xmath63 we have @xmath64 and - reduce to nses .
when @xmath65 , burnett equations can be derived . alternatively , following the method of @xcite , 13- , 20- and 26-moment equations @xcite can be derived from the boltzmann equation to describe flows at different levels of rarefaction . here
the regularized 20-moment ( r20 ) equations are used , which , in addition to - , include governing equations for the high - order moments @xmath57 , @xmath58 , and @xmath66 : @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 the constitutive relationships between the unknown higher - order moments ( @xmath70 , @xmath71 and @xmath72 ) and the lower - order moments were given by structrup & torrilhon ( 2003 ) and gu & emerson ( 2009 ) to close to . for linearized flows , it is adequate to use the linear gradient transport terms only and they are : @xmath73 where the collision constant @xmath74 is 2.097 for maxwell molecules @xcite .
macroscopic wall boundary conditions were obtained from the diffuse boundary condition @xcite . in a frame where the coordinates are attached to the wall , with @xmath75 the normal vector of the wall pointing towards the gas and
@xmath76 the tangential vector of the wall , the velocity - slip parallel to the wall @xmath77 and temperature - jump conditions are : @xmath78 where @xmath79 .
the rest of wall boundary conditions for higher - order moments are listed in appendix [ wall_hob ] .
note that the velocity - slip boundary condition is also of higher - order due to the appearance of the higher - order moment @xmath80 . following the above introduction
, it is clear that nses with fvbc are only accurate to the first - order of @xmath10 ; therefore , any apparent gas permeability showing the nonlinear dependence with @xmath10 is highly questionable .
the r20 equations are accurate to the third - order of @xmath10 @xcite , which should give the some apparent permeability of the porous media as nses when @xmath81 , and be more accurate than nses as @xmath10 increases .
numerical simulations are also performed to demonstrate this .
we first investigate the rarefied gas through a periodic array of discs with the diameter @xmath82 , as shown in fig .
[ geo ] . using nses and fvbc ,
when the porosity @xmath83 is large , the slip - corrected permeability can be obtained analytically @xcite : @xmath84,\ ] ] where @xmath85 is the solid fraction and @xmath86 when the diffuse boundary condition is used @xcite .
the intrinsic permeability is obtained when @xmath87 .
+ the accuracy of the slip - corrected permeability is assessed by comparing to numerical solutions of the bgk equation and r20 equations , when the porosity is @xmath88 . for the linearized bgk equation ,
two reduced distribution functions were introduced to cast the three - dimensional molecular velocity space into a two - dimensional one , and the obtained two equations are solved numerically by the discrete velocity method @xcite and the unified gas kinetic scheme @xcite . in the unified gas kinetic scheme ,
a body - fitted structured curvilinear mesh is used , with 150 lines along the radial direction and 300 lines along the circumferential direction , see fig .
[ apparent_permeability](a ) . in the discrete velocity method ,
a cartesian grid with @xmath89 equally - spaced points is used and the solid surface is approximated by thestair - case " . in solving the r20 equations ,
a similar body - fitted mesh with @xmath90 cells is used , and the detailed numerical method is given by @xcite .
the molecular velocity space in the bgk equation is also discretized : @xmath91 and @xmath92 are approximated by the @xmath93 gauss - hermite quadrature when @xmath10 is small ( @xmath94 in this case ) , and the newton - cotes quadrature with @xmath95 non - uniform discrete velocity points @xcite when @xmath10 is large . the apparent permeability is plotted in fig .
[ apparent_permeability](b ) as a function of @xmath10 .
when @xmath96 , our numerical simulations based on the linearized bgk equation and r20 equations agree with each other , and the apparent permeability is a linear function of @xmath10 .
when @xmath97 , the r20 equations ,
although being accurate to the third - order of @xmath10 , predict lower apparent permeability than that of the bgk equation .
the slip - corrected permeability increases linearly with @xmath10 only when @xmath98 , and then quickly reaches to a maximum value when @xmath97 .
this comparison clearly demonstrates that , nses with fvbc are only accurate to the first - order of @xmath10 .
this result is in accordance with the approximation adopted in the derivation of nses from the boltzmann equation .
although the `` curvature of the solid - gas interface '' makes the apparent permeability a concave function of @xmath10 in the framework of nses with fvbc @xcite , higher - order moments in - and the higher - order velocity slip in , which are derived from the boltzmann equation and the gas kinetic boundary condition to the third - order accuracy of @xmath10 , restore linear dependence of the apparent permeability on @xmath10 when @xmath96 . + the conclusion that nses with fvbc is accurate only to the first - order of @xmath10 not only holds for the simple porous medium as shown in fig .
[ geo ] , but also applies to more complex porous media , for example , see the unit cell in fig .
[ randomdisc](a ) where the porosity is 0.6 . in this case
, the linearized bgk equation is solved by the discrete velocity method , with a cartesian mesh of @xmath99 cells ; the grid convergence is verified , as using @xmath100 cells only results in a 0.6% increase of the apparent permeability when @xmath101 .
nses with fvbc are solved in openfoam using the simple algorithm and a cell - centered finite - volume discretization scheme , on unstructured grids .
a body - fitted computational grid is generated using the openfoam meshing tool , resulting in a mesh of about 600,000 cells of which the majority are hexahedra and the rest few close to the walls are prisms .
the apparent permeability from nses increases linearly over a very narrow region of the knudsen number ( i.e. @xmath102 ) and then quickly reaches a constant value . again , from fig .
[ randomdisc](b ) we see that nses with fvbc is roughly accurate when the apparent permeability is a linear function of @xmath10 ; in this region of @xmath10 , the maximum apparent permeability @xmath7 is only about one and a half times larger than the intrinsic permeability @xmath5 .
in summary , through our numerical simulations based on the linearized bhatnagar - gross - krook equation and the regularized 20-moment equations , we show that the navier - stokes equations with the first - order velocity - slip boundary condition can only predict the apparent permeability of the porous media to the first - order accuracy of the knudsen number .
lw acknowledges the support of an early career researcher international exchange award from the glasgow research partnership in engineering , allowing him to visit the hong kong university of science and technology for one month .
lg thanks lianhua zhu for helpful discussions on the first - order velocity - slip boundary condition in openfoam .
this work is also partly supported by the engineering and physical sciences research council in the uk under grant ep / m021475/1 .
the wall boundary conditions for higher - order moments are given as follows : @xmath103 where @xmath104 and @xmath105 .
|
permeability of porous media unconventional gas production laminar flows in highly permeable media darcy s law states volume flow rate proportional to pressure gradient cross - section area flow @xmath4 shear viscosity fluid @xmath5 permeability medium independent of fluid @xmath5 known as intrinsic permeability gas flows in low permeable media measured permeability larger increases with mean gas pressure apparent permeability @xmath7 expressed as correction factor variation of apparent permeability mean gas pressure due to rarefaction effects infrequent collisions between gas molecules cause gas slippage modify relation between stress and strain - rate extent of rarefaction characterized by knudsen number @xmath10 ratio of mean free path of gas molecules to characteristic flow length ) : shear viscosity gas at reference temperature @xmath16 gas constant gas flows classified into four regimes region of @xmath10 for different flow regimes may changecontinuum flow @xmath17 navier - stokes equations nses slip flow @xmath18 nses velocity - slip temperature - jump boundary conditions transition flow @xmath19 free - molecular flow @xmath20 nses break down boltzmann equation rarefied gas flows nses velocity - slip boundary condition apparent gas permeability porous media nonlinear function @xmath10 questionable nses used beyond validity theoretical analysis numerical calculations nses fvbc predict apparent permeability porous media first - order accuracy @xmath10 gas flowing periodic porous media geometry @xmath21-direction uniform infinite gas flow two - dimensional studied unit rectangular cell abcd governing equations boundary conditions porous medium periodic array discs fig . apparent permeability varies knudsen number boltzmann equation fundamental rarefied gas dynamics continuum free - molecular flow regimes distribution function @xmath22 system state @xmath23 @xmath24 - dimensional molecular velocity probable speed spatial coordinate length side ab time @xmath28 @xmath30 boltzmann collision operatorcomputational cost @xmath31 replaced by relaxation - time approximation @xcite bhatnagar - gross - krook equation simulation poiseuille flow between plates bgk equation accurate mass flow rates gas flow not free - molecular regime porous medium long pressure gradient small bgk equation linearized distribution function expressed as @xmath32 @xmath33 equilibrium perturbation @xmath34 governed by @xcite @xmath35 macroscopic quantities perturbed density velocity temperature calculated as @xmath40 kinetic equation supplied with boundary condition pressure gradient along @xmath41 direction inlet outlet computational domain abcd coordinates @xmath42 @xmath43 pressure gradient applied periodic condition for flow velocity used @xcite : @xmath44 at lines ab and cd specular reflection boundary condition symmetry @xmath45 solid surface diffuse boundary condition used @xcite : @xmath49 @xmath50 normal velocity vector at solid surfacegas permeability normalized by @xmath51 calculated by @xmath52 state gas described by density velocity temperature @xmath55 dynamics by euler equations newton s law for stress fourier s law for heat flux equations derived from boltzmann equation velocity moments five quantities governed by equations @xmath56 equations not closed expressions for shear stress @xmath57 heat flux @xmath58 not known chapman - enskog expansion distribution function expressed in power series of @xmath10 @xcite : @xmath59 @xmath60 maxwellian distribution function @xmath61 @xmath62 and - reduce to euler equations distribution function truncated at first @xmath10 @xmath63 @xmath64 and - reduce to nses @xmath65 burnett equations derived 13- 20- 26-moment equations derived from boltzmann equation flows at different levels rarefactionregularized 20-moment equations used include high - order moments @xmath57 relationships between higher - order lower - order moments by structrup & torrilhon 2003 gu & emerson ( 2009 ) for linearized flows linear gradient transport terms @xmath73 collision constant @xmath74 2.097 for maxwell molecules macroscopic wall boundary conditions from diffuse boundary condition @xcite coordinates attached to wall @xmath75 towards gas @xmath76 velocity - slip parallel to wall @xmath77 temperature - jump conditions @xmath78 @xmath79 wall boundary conditions for higher - order moments in appendix [ wall_hob ] velocity - slip boundary condition higher - order due higher - order moment @xmath80 nses with fvbc accurate to first - order of @xmath10 gas permeability nonlinear dependence @xmath10 questionable r20 equations accurate to third - order of @xmath10 @xcite apparent permeability porous media @xmath81 more accurate @xmath10 increases numerical simulations demonstrate investigate rarefied gas through periodic array discs with diameter @xmath82 in fig .nses fvbc porosity @xmath83 large slip - corrected permeability obtained analytically @xmath84 @xmath85 solid fraction @xmath86 diffuse boundary condition intrinsic permeability @xmath87 accuracy slip - corrected permeability numerical solutions bgk equation r20 equations porosity @xmath88 linearized bgk equation two reduced distribution functions three - molecular velocity two - dimensional equations solved discrete velocity method unified gas kinetic scheme body - fitted structured curvilinear mesh 150 lines radial 300 lines circumferential discrete velocity method cartesian grid @xmath89 equally - spaced points solid surface approximated - case r20 equations similar body - fitted mesh @xmath90 cells detailed numerical method @xcite molecular velocity space bgk equation discretized @xmath91 @xmath92 approximated @xmath93 gauss - hermite quadrature @xmath10 small newton - cotes quadrature @xmath95 non - uniform discrete velocity points @xmath10 large apparent permeability plotted fig . function @xmath10@xmath96 numerical simulations bgk r20 equations agree apparent permeability linear function of @xmath10 @xmath97 r20 equations accurate third - order @xmath10 predict lower permeability than bgk equation slip - corrected permeability increases with @xmath10 @xmath98 maximum @xmath97 demonstrates nses with fvbc accurate to first - order @xmath10 derivation nses from boltzmann equation curvature solid - gas interface permeability concave function of @xmath10 higher - order moments in - velocity slip in derived from boltzmann equation gas kinetic boundary - accuracy restore linear dependence permeability on @xmath10 @xmath96 conclusion nses with fvbc accurate to first - order @xmath10 porous medium applies complex porous media unit cell fig . porosity 0.6 linearized bgk equation solved by discrete velocity method cartesian mesh of @xmath99 cells grid convergence verified @xmath100 cells results in 0.6% increase apparent permeability when @xmath101nses fvbc solved in openfoam algorithm cell - centered finite - volume discretization scheme unstructured grids body - fitted grid generated openfoam meshing tool 600,000 cells majority hexahedra prisms apparent permeability increases over narrow region knudsen number @xmath102 reaches constant fig nses fvbc accurate when permeability linear function @xmath10 @xmath10 maximum permeability @xmath7 one and a half times larger than intrinsic permeability @xmath5 numerical simulations navier - stokes equations first - order velocity - slip boundary condition predict apparent permeability porous media first - order accuracy knudsen number early career researcher international exchange award glasgow research partnership engineering hong kong university science technology thanks lianhua zhu discussions first - order velocity - slip boundary condition openfoam work supported by engineering physical sciences research council grant ep / m021475/1 wall boundary conditions for higher - order moments @xmath103 @xmath104 @xmath105
| 0.503311
| 3,230
| 1,610
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,255
|
results on the derivative of @xmath0 with respect to @xmath1 at fixed @xmath2 are presented .
the measured derivatives are within errors independent of @xmath3 for @xmath4 gev@xmath5 and increase linearly with @xmath6 for @xmath7 and @xmath8 gev@xmath5 .
the results are based on preliminary and published h1 data which at @xmath2 below 2 gev@xmath5 are combined with nmc and zeus data .
|
the rise of the proton structure function @xmath9 towards small bjorken @xmath3 has been discussed since the existence of qcd . in the double asymptotic limit ( large energies , i.e. small @xmath3 , and large photon virtualities @xmath2 ) the dglap evolution equations @xcite can be solved @xcite and @xmath9 is expected to rise approximately like a power of @xmath3 towards low @xmath3 . a power like behaviour
is also expected in the bfkl approach @xcite .
however , it soon was discussed @xcite that this rise may eventually be limited by gluon self interactions in the nucleon , or more generally due to unitarity constraints . experimentally this rise towards small @xmath3
was first observed in 1993 in the hera data @xcite .
meanwhile the precision of the @xmath9 data is much improved and the rise can be studied in great detail .
the low @xmath3 behaviour of @xmath9 at fixed @xmath2 is studied locally by the measurement of the derivative @xmath10 as function of @xmath3 and @xmath2 .
the results are based on preliminary h1 @xmath9 data presented to this conference @xcite covering the range @xmath11 gev@xmath5 and published h1 data @xcite , @xcite which cover the range @xmath12 gev@xmath5 .
the low @xmath2 @xmath9 data were obtained by shifting the @xmath13 interaction vertex by 70 cm in proton beam direction @xcite . at @xmath14 gev@xmath5
the h1 data are also shown combined with data of nmc @xcite and zeus @xcite .
the derivative @xmath15 is evaluated using data points at adjacent values of @xmath3 at fixed @xmath2 taking into account error correlations and @xmath3 spacing corrections .
the derivatives are compared with the next to leading order ( nlo ) qcd fit to the h1 cross section data @xcite and a `` fractal '' fit @xcite where self - similar properties of the proton structure are assumed .
the @xmath3 and @xmath2 dependence of @xmath16 is shown in fig . [
fig : der1 ] .
( 200,336 ) ( -15,220 . ) ( -15,5 . ) the new shifted vertex and the published data agree well in the overlap region .
the derivative @xmath17 is constant within experimental uncertainties for fixed @xmath18 in the range @xmath19 , implying that the data are consistent with the power behaviour @xmath20 .
fitting this form for each @xmath2 bin to the data at @xmath19 , results in the @xmath17 and @xmath21 values presented in fig .
[ fig : lamh1 ] .
( 200,315 ) ( -25,105 . )
( -25,0 . )
the results show that the @xmath22 data at low @xmath3 for @xmath23 gev@xmath5 can be well described by the very simple parameterisation @xmath24\ ] ] with @xmath25 and @xmath26 mev and @xmath27 . at low @xmath2
the deviation of @xmath17 from the logarithmic @xmath2 dependence and the decrease of @xmath28 is more significant if the h1 data are combined with nmc @xcite and zeus @xcite data ( see fig .
[ fig : lammerge ] ) .
( 200,315 ) ( -35,105 . )
( -35,0 . ) the deviations from a simple constant respectively logarithmic behaviour occur at about such @xmath2 values below which perturbative qcd fits ( e.g. @xcite ) are not supposed to be valid . at small @xmath2 the structure function @xmath9 can be related to the total virtual photon absorption cross section by @xmath29 where the total @xmath30 energy squared is given by @xmath31 . for @xmath32 we can expect @xmath33 and @xmath34 .
the latter value corresponds to the energy dependence of soft hadronic interactions @xmath35 with @xmath36 @xcite which is approximately reached at @xmath37 gev@xmath5 .
no significant deviation from the power behaviour @xmath38 at fixed @xmath2 is visible at present energies and @xmath39 gev@xmath40 . more specifically : * for @xmath19 the derivative @xmath10 is independent of @xmath3 within errors .
* @xmath17 is proportional to @xmath41 for @xmath42 gev@xmath5 , i.e. in the pqcd region . * here the data can be very simply parametrised by @xmath43 . * at @xmath44 gev@xmath5 deviations from the logarithmic @xmath2 dependence of @xmath17 are observed .
* at low @xmath45 gev@xmath46 the energy rise is similar as in soft hadronic interactions .
99 y. l. dokshitzer , ( in russian ) , sov .
jetp * 46 * ( 1977 ) 641 [ zh .
* 73 * ( 1977 ) 1216 ] ; + v. n. gribov and l. n. lipatov , yad .
fiz . * 15 * ( 1972 ) 1218 [ sov . j. nucl . phys .
* 15 * ( 1972 ) 675 ] ; yad . fiz .
* 15 * ( 1972 ) 781 [ sov .
j. nucl .
* 15 * ( 1972 ) 438 ] ; + g. altarelli and g. parisi , nucl .
b * 126 * ( 1977 ) 298 .
de rujula et al , phys .
d * 10 * ( 1974 ) 1649 ; + r. d. ball and s. forte , phys .
b * 335 * ( 1994 ) 77 .
e. a. kuraev , l. n. lipatov and v. s. fadin , sov .
jetp * 44 * ( 1976 ) 443 [ zh .
* 71 * ( 1976 ) 840 ] ; sov .
jetp * 45 * ( 1977 ) 199 [ zh .
* 72 * ( 1977 ) 377 ] ; + i. i. balitsky and l. n. lipatov , sov .
j. nucl .
* 28 * ( 1978 )
822 [ yad . fiz .
* 28 * ( 1978 ) 1597 ] . l. v. gribov , e. m. levin and m. g. ryskin , nucl .
b * 188 * ( 1981 ) 555 ; phys .
* 100 * ( 1983 ) 1 ; + a. h. mueller and j. w. qiu , nucl . phys .
b * 268 * ( 1986 ) 427 .
i. abt _ et al . _
[ h1 collaboration ] , nucl .
b * 407 * ( 1993 ) 515 ; + m. derrick _ et al . _
[ zeus collaboration ] , phys .
b * 316 * ( 1993 ) 412 .
t. lastovicka , these proceedings .
m. arneodo _ et al . _
[ new muon collaboration .
] , phys .
b * 364 * ( 1995 ) 107 ; nucl .
b * 483 * ( 1997 ) 3 .
j. breitweg _ et al . _
[ zeus collaboration ] , phys .
b * 487 * ( 2000 ) 53 .
t. lastovicka , arxiv : hep - ph/0203260 and these proceedings .
a. donnachie and p. v. landshoff , phys .
b * 296 * ( 1992 ) 227 .
|
rise proton structure @xmath9 towards small bjorken @xmath3 discussed since qcd double asymptotic limit large energies large photon virtualities dglap evolution equations solved @xmath9 expected rise like power @xmath3 towards low @xmath3 behaviour bfkl approach rise limited by gluon interactions unitarity constraints rise towards small @xmath3 observed 1993 hera data precision @xmath9 data improved rise studied detail low @xmath3 behaviour @xmath9 at fixed @xmath2 studied measurement derivative @xmath10 function @xmath3 results based on preliminary h1 @xmath9 data published h1 data low @xmath2 @xmath9 data obtained by shifting @xmath13 interaction vertex 70 cm proton beam direction @xmath14 gev@xmath5 h1 data shown combined with data nmc @xcite zeus derivative @xmath15 evaluated using data points adjacent values @xmath3 fixed @xmath2 error correlations spacing correctionsderivatives compared with qcd fit h1 data @xcite properties proton structure @xmath3 dependence @xmath16 shown fig . ( 200,336 ) -15,220 -15,5 shifted vertex published data agree overlap region derivative @xmath17 constant experimental uncertainties @xmath18 @xmath19 data consistent with power behaviour @xmath20 fitting @xmath2 bin data @xmath19 results @xmath17 @xmath21 values fig ( 200,315 ) -25,105 -25,0 . results show @xmath22 data low @xmath3 @xmath23@xmath5 described parameterisation @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 low @xmath2 deviation of @xmath17 @xmath2 dependence decrease @xmath28 significant if h1 data combined with nmc @xcite zeus @xcite data ( 200,315 ) ( -35,105 -35,0 . deviations from logarithmic behaviour occur at @xmath2 values perturbative qcd fits not valid small @xmath2 structure function @xmath9 related to virtual photon absorption by @xmath29 total @xmath30 energy squared by @xmath31@xmath32 expect @xmath33 @xmath34 latter value corresponds energy dependence soft hadronic interactions @xmath35 @xmath36 reached @xmath37 gev@xmath5 no significant deviation power behaviour @xmath38 fixed @xmath2 visible present energies @xmath39 gev@xmath40 @xmath19 derivative @xmath10 independent @xmath3 @xmath17 proportional @xmath41 @xmath42 gev@xmath5 pqcd region data parametrised @xmath43 @xmath44 gev@xmath5 deviations logarithmic @xmath2 dependence @xmath17 observed low @xmath45 gev@xmath46 energy rise similar soft hadronic interactions 99 dokshitzer russian sov jetp 46 * 1977 ) 641 1977 ) 1216 v n. gribov l n lipatov 15 1972 ) 1218 675 781 438 g. altarelli g. parisi 126 1977 ) 298 rujula phys . 10 1974 ) 1649 r. d. ball s. forte phys . 335 1994 ) 77 kuraev l n. lipatov v s. fadin jetp 44 * 1976 ) 44371 1976 ) 840 jetp 45 1977 ) 199 72 1977 ) 377. balitsky l. lipatov nucl 28 1978 ) 822 fiz 28 1978 ) 1597 v. gribov. levin m g. ryskin nucl 188 1981 ) 555 . 100 1983 ) 1 a. h. mueller j. w. qiu 268 ( 1986 ) 427 abt h1 collaboration nucl 407 ( 1993 ) 515 m. derrick zeus collaboration . 316 ( 1993 ) 412 lastovicka proceedings arneodo new muon collaboration . 364 1995 ) 107 nucl 483 ( 1997 ) 3 j breitweg zeus collaboration phys 487 ( 2000 ) 53 lastovicka arxiv hep - ph/0203260 proceedings. donnachie p. v. landshoff phys . 296 ( 1992 ) 227
| 0.265808
| 1,866
| 962
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,257
|
the international linear collider ( ilc ) will be able to precisely measure the electroweak couplings of the top in @xmath0 .
we compare the limits which can be achieved at the ilc with those which can be obtained in @xmath1 and @xmath2 production at the large hadron collider ( lhc ) .
|
although the top quark was discovered almost ten years ago @xcite , many of its properties are still only poorly known @xcite . in particular , the couplings of the top quark to the electroweak ( ew ) gauge bosons have not yet been directly measured .
current data provide only weak constraints on the couplings of the top quark with the ew gauge bosons , except for the @xmath3 vector and axial vector couplings which are rather tightly but indirectly constrained by lep data ; and the right - handed @xmath4 coupling , which is severely bound by the observed @xmath5 rate @xcite . at an @xmath6 linear collider with @xmath7 gev and an integrated luminosity of @xmath8 fb@xmath9
one can hope to measure the @xmath10 ( @xmath11 ) couplings in top pair production with a few - percent precision @xcite .
however , the process @xmath12 is sensitive to both @xmath13 and @xmath3 couplings and significant cancellations between the various couplings can occur . at hadron colliders ,
@xmath14 production is so dominated by the qcd processes @xmath15 and @xmath16 that a measurement of the @xmath13 and @xmath3 couplings via @xmath17 is hopeless . instead
, the @xmath10 couplings can be measured in qcd @xmath18 production , radiative top quark decays in @xmath14 events ( @xmath19 ) , and qcd @xmath20 production @xcite .
@xmath18 production and radiative top quark decays are sensitive only to the @xmath13 couplings , whereas @xmath20 production gives information only on the structure of the @xmath3 vertex .
this obviates having to disentangle potential cancellations between the different couplings . in this contribution we briefly review the measurement of the @xmath10 couplings at the lhc and compare the expected sensitivities with the bounds which one hopes to achieve at an @xmath6 linear collider .
the most general lorentz - invariant vertex function describing the interaction of a neutral vector boson @xmath21 with two top quarks can be written in terms of ten form factors @xcite , which are functions of the kinematic invariants . in the low energy limit , these correspond to couplings which multiply dimension - four or -five operators in an effective lagrangian , and may be complex .
if @xmath21 is on - shell , or if @xmath21 couples to effectively massless fermions , the number of independent form factors is reduced to eight .
if , in addition , both top quarks are on - shell , the number is further reduced to four . in this case , the @xmath10 vertex can be written in the form @xmath22 where @xmath23 is the proton charge , @xmath24 is the top quark mass , @xmath25 is the outgoing top ( anti - top ) quark four - momentum , and @xmath26 .
the terms @xmath27 and @xmath28 in the low energy limit are the @xmath10 vector and axial vector form factors .
the coefficients @xmath29 and @xmath30 are related to the magnetic and ( @xmath31-violating ) electric dipole form factors . in @xmath32 production ,
one of the top quarks coupling to @xmath21 is off - shell .
the most general vertex function relevant for @xmath32 production thus contains additional couplings , not included in eq .
( [ eq : anomvertex ] ) .
these additional couplings are irrelevant in @xmath33 , where both top quarks are on - shell . in @xmath33
one often uses the following parameterization for the @xmath10 vertex : @xmath34 using the gordon decomposition , it is easy to show that eqs .
( [ eq : anomvertex ] ) and ( [ eq : gordon ] ) are equivalent for onshell top quarks and that the form factors @xmath35 and @xmath36 ( @xmath37 ) are related by @xmath38
the process @xmath39 followed by @xmath40 leads either to a @xmath41 final state if both @xmath42 bosons decay leptonically , to a @xmath43 final state if one @xmath42 decays leptonically and the other decays hadronically , or to a @xmath44 final state if both @xmath42 bosons decay hadronically .
the @xmath44 final state has the largest br .
however , it is plagued by a large qcd background , so we ignore it .
the dilepton final state , although less contaminated by background , has a br about a factor 6 smaller than that of the so - called lepton+jets mode . in the following ,
we therefore concentrate on @xmath45 with @xmath46 .
we assume that both @xmath47 quarks are tagged with a combined efficiency of @xmath48 .
we perform our calculation for general @xmath13 couplings of the form of eq .
( [ eq : anomvertex ] ) .
we otherwise assume the sm to be valid .
our calculation includes top quark and @xmath42 decays with full spin correlations and finite width effects .
all resonant feynman diagrams contributing to the lepton+jets final state are included , i.e. besides @xmath18 production , we automatically take into account top quark pair production where one of the top quarks decays radiatively , @xmath49 .
we impose standard acceptance cuts for leptons , jets , and the missing transverse momentum .
a detailed list can be found in ref .
we also include minimal detector effects via gaussian smearing of parton momenta according to cms @xcite expectations , and take into account the @xmath47 jet energy loss via a parameterized function . since we are interested in photon emission from top quarks , we would like to suppress radiation from @xmath42 decay products , as well as emission from @xmath47 quarks .
imposing a large separation cut of @xmath50 reduces photon radiation from the @xmath47 quarks .
photon emission from @xmath42 decay products can essentially be eliminated by requiring that @xmath51 and @xmath52 where @xmath53 is the invariant mass of the @xmath54 system , and @xmath55 is the @xmath56 cluster transverse mass , which peaks sharply at @xmath57 .
in addition we require that the event is consistent either with @xmath18 production , or with @xmath14 production with radiative top decay .
this will reduce the singly - resonant and non - resonant backgrounds .
the invariant mass and cluster transverse mass cuts which are imposed to accomplish this can be found in ref .
@xcite .
the most important irreducible background processes that remain after imposing the cuts described above , are single - top processes ( @xmath58 ) , and the non - resonant process @xmath59 .
we calculate the irreducible background processes at leading order in qcd including the full set of contributing feynman diagrams using madevent @xcite .
the potentially most dangerous reducible background is @xmath60 production where one of the jets in the final state fakes a photon . [
cols="^,^ " , ] [ tab : tab1 ] it is instructive to compare the bounds for anomalous @xmath10 couplings achievable at the lhc with those projected for the ilc .
the most complete study of @xmath14 production at the ilc for general @xmath10 ( @xmath11 ) couplings so far is that of ref .
it uses the parameterization of eq .
( [ eq : gordon ] ) for the @xmath10 vertex function . in order to compare the bounds of ref .
@xcite with those anticipated at the lhc , the limits on @xmath61 and @xmath62 have to be converted into bounds on @xmath63 and @xmath64 .
table [ tab : tab1 ] compares the bounds we obtain for @xmath65 and @xmath66 with those reported for the ilc in ref .
we show lhc limits only for an integrated luminosity of 300 fb@xmath9 .
the results of table [ tab : tab1 ] demonstrate that the ilc , with the exception of @xmath67 and @xmath68 , will be able to considerably improve the sensitivity limits which can be achieved at the lhc , in particular for the @xmath3 couplings .
the lhc will be able to perform first tests of the @xmath10 couplings . already with an integrated luminosity of 30 fb@xmath9 , one can probe the @xmath13 couplings with a precision of about @xmath69 per experiment . with higher integrated luminosities
one will be able to reach the few percent region .
the @xmath20 cross section with leptonic @xmath70 decays is roughly a factor 20 smaller than the @xmath18 rate .
it is therefore not surprising that the sensitivity limits on the @xmath3 couplings are significantly weaker than those which one expects for the @xmath13 couplings .
the ilc , with the exception of @xmath67 and @xmath68 , will be able to further improve our knowledge of the @xmath10 couplings , in particular in the @xmath3 case .
99 f. abe _ et al . _
( cdf collaboration ) , phys .
lett . * 74 * , 2626 ( 1995 ) .
s. abachi _ et al . _
( d collaboration ) , phys .
lett . * 74 * , 2632 ( 1995 ) .
d. chakraborty , j. konigsberg and d. l. rainwater , ann . rev
. nucl .
sci . * 53 * , 301 ( 2003 ) .
f. larios , m. a. perez and c. p. yuan , phys .
b457 * , 334 ( 1999 ) ; m. frigeni and r. rattazzi , phys . lett . *
b269 * , 412 ( 1991 ) .
t. abe _ et al .
_ ( american linear collider working group collaboration ) , arxiv : hep - ex/0106057 .
u. baur , a. juste , l. h. orr and d. rainwater , phys .
rev . * d71 * , 054013 ( 2005 ) .
w. hollik _ et al .
_ , nucl . phys . *
b551 * , 3 ( 1999 ) [ erratum - ibid . *
b557 * , 407 ( 1999 ) ] .
|
top quark discovered ten years ago properties poorly known couplings to gauge bosons measured current data provide weak constraints on couplings with bosons except @xmath3 axial vector couplings constrained by lep data right - handed @xmath4 coupling bound by @xmath5 rate at @xmath6 linear collider with @xmath7 gev integrated luminosity measure @xmath10 ( @xmath11 couplings in top production with few - percent precision process @xmath12 sensitive to @xmath13 @xmath3 couplings cancellations occur at hadron colliders @xmath14 production dominated by qcd processes @xmath15 @xmath16 measurement @xmath13 @xmath3 couplings via @xmath17 hopeless @xmath10 couplings measured in qcd @xmath18 production radiative top quark decays qcd @xmath20 production @xmath18 production sensitive to @xmath13 couplings @xmath20 production structure @xmath3 vertex obviates cancellations review measurement of @xmath10 couplings at lhc compare expected sensitivities with bounds at @xmath6 linear colliderlorentz - invariant vertex function interaction neutral vector boson @xmath21 with two top quarks ten form factors functions of kinematic invariants low energy limit correspond to couplings dimension - four or -five operators lagrangian complex if @xmath21 on - shell couples massless fermions independent form factors to eight both top quarks on - shell to four @xmath10 vertex @xmath22 @xmath23 proton charge @xmath24 top quark mass @xmath25 outgoing top quark - momentum @xmath26 @xmath27 and @xmath28 are @xmath10 vector axial vector form factors coefficients @xmath29 and @xmath30 related to magnetic electric dipole form factors @xmath32 production one top to @xmath21 off - shell vertex function @xmath32 production contains additional couplings not included eq couplings irrelevant in @xmath33 both top quarks on - shell parameterization for @xmath10 vertex : @xmath34eq anomvertex gordon equivalent for onshell top quarks form factors @xmath35 @xmath36 related by @xmath38 process @xmath39 followed @xmath40 leads to @xmath41 state if bosons decay leptonically @xmath43 if one decays leptonically hadronically @xmath44 if decay hadronically @xmath44 final state largest br plagued large qcd background ignore it dilepton final state less contaminated br factor 6 smaller than lepton+jets mode concentrate on @xmath45 with @xmath46 assume @xmath47 quarks tagged with combined efficiency @xmath48 calculation for @xmath13 couplings anomvertex assume sm valid calculation includes top quark @xmath42 decays with full spin correlations finite width effects resonant feynman diagrams lepton+jets final state included top quark pair production where decays radiatively impose standard acceptance cuts for leptons jets missing transverse momentum detailed list in ref include minimal detector effects gaussian smearing parton momenta @xmath47 jet energy loss parameterized functioninterested in photon emission top quarks suppress radiation @xmath42 decay products @xmath47 quarks large separation cut of @xmath50 reduces radiation @xmath47 quarks emission from @xmath42 decay products requiring @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 invariant mass @xmath54 system @xmath55 @xmath56 cluster transverse mass peaks at @xmath57 require event consistent with @xmath18 or @xmath14 production radiative top decay singly - resonant non - resonant backgrounds invariant mass cluster transverse mass cuts in ref . @xcite important irreducible background processes after cuts single - top processes @xmath58 ) non - resonant process @xmath59 calculate processes at leading order in qcd diagrams using @xcite dangerous background @xmath60 production fakes photon compare bounds for anomalous @xmath10 couplings at lhc with ilc complete study of @xmath14 production at ilc for @xmath10 couplings ref uses parameterization of eq for @xmath10 vertex functionanticipated lhc limits @xmath61 converted into bounds @xmath63 table compares bounds @xmath65 @xmath66 ilc lhc limits integrated luminosity 300 fb@xmath9 results demonstrate ilc exception @xmath67 improve sensitivity limits lhc @xmath3 couplings lhc perform tests @xmath10 couplings integrated luminosity 30 fb@xmath9 probe @xmath13 couplings precision @xmath69 per experiment higher luminosities reach few percent region @xmath20 cross section with leptonic @xmath70 decays factor 20 smaller than @xmath18 rate limits @xmath3 couplings weaker than @xmath13 couplings ilc exception @xmath67 @xmath68 improve knowledge @xmath10 couplings @xmath3 case f. abe _ et al . collaboration phys . lett . * 74 *, 2626 ( 1995 ) abachi et al . collaboration phys . lett. 74 2632 ( 1995 ). chakraborty j. konigsberg d. l. rainwater ann . rev . nucl . sci . 53 *, 301 ( 2003 ) larios m. a.perez yuan phys b457 334 ( 1999 ) frigeni rattazzi phys b269 412 ( 1991 ) abe american linear collider working group collaboration arxiv hep - ex/0106057 baur juste h orr rainwater phys . d71 054013 ( 2005 ) hollik nucl . b551 3 ( 1999 ) erratum ibid b557 407 ( 1999 )
| 0.348722
| 2,397
| 1,238
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,264
|
the lhc potential for a measurement of the higgs boson coupling to the @xmath0 quark in the standard model is not well established yet .
we show that requiring a large transverse momentum photon in the light higgs boson production via vector - boson fusion ( with subsequent @xmath1 decay ) could provide a further handle on the @xmath2 coupling determination , and on the measurement of the @xmath3 coupling as well .
|
once the higgs boson will be discovered at the lhc , it will be crucial to test its properties , and check how well they fit in the standard model ( sm ) framework .
higgs boson couplings to vector bosons , heavy quarks and heavy leptons can in principle be measured by combining informations on different production and decay channels @xcite .
a measurement of the higgs boson coupling to @xmath0 quarks seems presently quite challenging . on the one hand ,
the sm higgs production channel @xmath4 is overwhelmed by the main production process @xmath5 at the lhc @xcite .
on the other hand , processes involving the @xmath6 coupling via the higgs decay @xmath7 ( for @xmath8 gev ) seem at the moment hard to manage , due to the large @xmath0 ( and , more generally , jet ) background expected from pure qcd processes .
the @xmath7 decay in the higgs production via vector - boson fusion ( vbf ) has been studied in @xcite .
it gives rise to four - jet final states , out of which two jets should be @xmath0-tagged .
although the vbf final states have quite distinctive kinematical features ( i.e. , two forward jets with a typical transverse momentum of order @xmath9 plus a resonant @xmath0-jet pair produced centrally ) , different sources of qcd backgrounds and hadronic effects presently make the relevance of this channel for a @xmath6 coupling determination difficult to assess . for instance ,
triggering on @xmath10 final states must confront with the corresponding large qcd four - jet trigger rate .
the @xmath11 associated production , where the higgs boson is radiated by a top - quark pair , with subsequent @xmath7 decay , could also provide a @xmath6 coupling measurement .
nevertheless , the recent inclusion of more reliable qcd background estimate and detector simulation in the corresponding signal analysis @xcite , have lowered the expectations on the potential of this channel . here
we report on a further process that could help in determining the @xmath12 coupling , that was recently studied in @xcite ( where more details can be found ) .
we consider the higgs boson production in vbf in association with a large transverse - momentum photon ( i.e. , @xmath13 gev ) emitted centrally ( i.e. , with pseudorapidity @xmath14 ) @xmath15 where @xmath16 decays to @xmath17 , and , at the parton level , the final qcd partons are identified with the corresponding jets @xmath18 .
disregarding the resonant contribution to the process coming from the @xmath19 production , the dominant feynman diagrams are the ones involving vbf ( as shown in figure 1 , where the higgs decay to @xmath17 is not shown ) .
final states @xmath20 arising from photon radiation off one of the two @xmath0-quarks arising from the higgs boson decay [ via @xmath21 fall outside the experimental @xmath22 resolution window around the @xmath23 , due to the requirement of a large @xmath24 photon .
-channel feynman diagrams for @xmath16 production via @xmath25.,height=264 ]
adding a central photon to the @xmath26 final state , despite a further e.m .
fine structure constant @xmath27 that depletes production rates , gives a number of benefits @xcite * the large ( critical ) rate for qcd multi - jet final states that characterizes the background for @xmath26 is depleted , too , by the electromagnetic coupling when requiring a further photon in the final state ; this is expected to improve triggering efficiencies of the detector ; * the large gluonic component entering the qcd background to the plain @xmath28 final state at parton level does not take part in the radiation of a large @xmath24 photon , so making part of the potential background to @xmath29 _ inactive _ ; * further dynamical _ coherence _ effects dramatically suppress the radiation of a photon in the irreducible qcd background to @xmath30 , when the photon is central ( i.e. emitted outside the typical radiation cone around the initial / final quark legs , for quarks scattered in the @xmath31-channel ) ; * a similar _ coherence _ effect depletes the @xmath32 amplitudes ( involving neutral currents ) with the respect to the @xmath3 ones ( involving charged currents ) in figure 1 , increasing the relative sensitivity to the @xmath3 coupling in the radiative channel ; then , a measurement of the @xmath30 rate could lead to a combined determination of the higgs boson couplings to @xmath0 quarks and @xmath33 vector bosons , with less contamination from the @xmath32 coupling uncertainties ; * the requirement of a central photon strongly reduces the background arising from alternative higgs boson production processes , such as the one coming from the virtual gluon fusion @xmath34 diagrams , with a photon radiated off any external quark leg . in the following
, we will elaborate on a few of the previous items .
in table [ tab:1 ] , the cross section for the signal and irreducible background for the process in eq .
( [ process ] ) are shown for three values of the higgs boson mass , as independently obtained by the monte carlo event generators alpgen @xcite , and madevent @xcite , with the choice of parameters described in @xcite .
the following event selection , that optimizes the significance @xmath35 , has been applied @xmath36 where @xmath37 is any pair of partons in the final state , and @xmath38 , with @xmath39 the pseudorapidity and @xmath40 the azimuthal angle . for comparison ,
cross sections and irreducible background for the plain vbf process are also shown .
llll @xmath41 & 120 gev & @xmath42 gev & @xmath43 gev + @xmath44 \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;$ ] & 3.6 fb & @xmath452.9 fb & @xmath452.0 fb + @xmath46 $ ] & @xmath4733 fb & @xmath4838 fb & @xmath4840 fb + @xmath49 $ ] & 320 fb & @xmath45255 fb & @xmath45168 fb + @xmath50 $ ] & 103 pb & @xmath45102 pb & @xmath45 98 pb + in case the usual pattern of qed corrections held , the request of a further hard photon would keep the relative weight of signal and background unchanged with respect to the @xmath51 case .
indeed , the rates for @xmath52 and its background would be related to a @xmath53 rescaling of the rates for the @xmath54 signal and its background , respectively , keeping the @xmath55 ratio approximately stable . on the other hand , both the @xmath56 signal and its background statistics would decrease according to the rescaling factor @xmath53 . consequently ,
if @xmath57 is the signal significance for the vbf process ( with ) without a central photon , the signal significance for @xmath52 would fall down as @xmath58 with respect to the basic vbf process .
this would question the usefulness of considering the @xmath59 variant of the @xmath54 process , apart from the expected improvement in the triggering efficiency of the detectors due to the lower background rates . in table
[ tab:1 ] , one can see that the qed naive expectations do not necessarily apply when restricted regions of phase space are considered ( as discussed in detail in @xcite ) .
we see that the naive qed rescaling fails for the main background processes @xmath60 , whose rate drops by about a factor 3000 after requiring a central photon , due to destructive interference ( _ coherence _ ) effects discussed in @xcite .
since , on the other hand , the signal cross section roughly follows the naive qed rescaling @xmath61 , the requirement of a central photon gives rise to a dramatic increase ( by more than one order of magnitude ) in the @xmath55 ratio .
indeed , in table [ tab:2 ] , comparable statistical significances for the signal with and without a photon are obtained , for an integrated luminosity of @xmath62 fb@xmath63 .
the impact of including a few main reducible backgrounds for @xmath64 has also been studied in @xcite , and found to be moderate .
llll @xmath41 & 120 gev & @xmath42 gev & @xmath43 gev + @xmath65 & @xmath66 2.6 & @xmath66 2.0 & @xmath66 1.3 + @xmath67 & @xmath66 3.5 & @xmath66 2.8 & @xmath451.9 + apart from enhancing the @xmath55 ratio , coherence effects in @xmath68 remarkably curb the relative contribution of the @xmath69 boson fusion diagrams with respect to the @xmath70 ones ( see @xcite for further details ) . then , the @xmath71 production at the lhc can have a role not only in the determination of the @xmath72 coupling , but also for a cleaner determination of the @xmath3 coupling .
the analysis presented above does not include parton - shower effects .
the latter are expected to further differentiate the signal and background final - state topology and composition . a preliminary analysis of showering and central - jet veto effects points to an improvement of @xmath73 by about a factor two @xcite .
the inclusion of complete showering , hadronization , and detector simulations will be needed to establish the actual potential of the process @xmath68 .
i wish to thank my collaborators emidio gabrielli , fabio maltoni , mauro moretti , fulvio piccinini , and roberto pittau for the enjoyable time i had in working out with them the results discussed above .
this research was partially supported by the rtn european programmes mrtn - ct-2006 - 035505 ( heptools , tools and precision calculations for physics discoveries at colliders ) , and mrtn - ct-2004 - 503369 ( quest for unification ) .
|
higgs boson discovered at lhc crucial test properties check standard model framework higgs boson couplings to vector bosons heavy quarks leptons measured combining informations production decay channels @xcite measurement higgs boson coupling to @xmath0 quarks challenging sm higgs production channel @xmath4 overwhelmed by production process @xmath5 lhc processes @xmath6 coupling higgs decay @xmath7 hard manage large @xmath0 jet background pure qcd processes @xmath7 decay in higgs production via vector - boson fusion studied in @xcite four - jet final states two jets @xmath0-tagged final states distinctive kinematical features two forward jets momentum resonant-jet pair qcd backgrounds hadronic effects make relevance for @xmath6 coupling determination difficult triggering on @xmath10 final states large qcd four - jet trigger rate @xmath11 production higgs boson radiated by top - quark pair @xmath7 decay could provide @xmath6 coupling measurementrecent reliable qcd background estimate detector simulation signal analysis @xcite lowered expectations potential channel report process @xmath12 coupling studied @xcite consider higgs boson production vbf large transverse - momentum photon @xmath13 gev emitted centrally pseudorapidity @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 decays to @xmath17 final qcd partons identified jets @xmath18 resonant contribution @xmath19 production dominant feynman diagrams involving vbf figure 1 higgs decay to @xmath17 not shown final states @xmath20 photon radiation @xmath0-quarks higgs boson decay fall outside @xmath22 resolution window @xmath23 large @xmath24 photon -channel feynman diagrams @xmath16 production via @xmath25 adding central photon @xmath26 final state further e.mstructure constant @xmath27 depletes production rates gives benefits large critical rate qcd multi - jet final states background @xmath26 depleted by electromagnetic coupling requiring further photon final state triggering efficiencies detector large gluonic component entering qcd background @xmath28 final state radiation large @xmath24 photon potential background @xmath29 dynamical coherence effects suppress radiation photon irreducible qcd background @xmath30 photon central outside radiation cone quark legs @xmath31-channel similar coherence effect depletes @xmath32 amplitudes neutral currents @xmath3 ones charged currents figure 1 increasing sensitivity to @xmath3 coupling radiative channel measurement @xmath30 rate combined determination higgs boson couplings @xmath0 quarks @xmath33 vector bosons less contamination from @xmath32 coupling uncertainties requirement central photon reduces background alternative higgs boson production processes virtual gluon fusion @xmath34 diagrams photon radiated off external quark leg elaborate previous items table tab:1 cross section signal irreducible background process eq .process shown three values higgs boson mass obtained by monte carlo event generators alpgen madevent parameters @xcite event selection optimizes significance @xmath35 applied @xmath36 @xmath37 partons final state @xmath38 @xmath39 pseudorapidity azimuthal angle cross sections irreducible background vbf process shown @xmath41 120 gev @xmath42 @xmath43 gev @xmath44 3.6 fb @xmath452.9 fb @xmath452.0 fb @xmath46 $ @xmath4733 fb @xmath4838 fb @xmath4840 fb @xmath49 $ 320 fb @xmath45255 fb @xmath45168 fb @xmath50 $ 103 pb @xmath45102 @xmath45 98 pb qed corrections request further hard photon weight signal background unchanged @xmath51 case rates @xmath52 background related to @xmath53 rescaling @xmath54 background @xmath55 ratio stable @xmath56 signal background statistics decrease rescaling factor @xmath53 @xmath57 signal significance vbf process central photon signal significance @xmath52 down @xmath58 basic vbf processquestion usefulness considering @xmath59 variant @xmath54 process expected improvement triggering efficiency lower background rates table tab:1 qed naive expectations apply restricted regions phase space discussed @xcite naive qed rescaling fails for main background processes @xmath60 rate drops factor 3000 after central photon due to destructive interference effects signal cross section follows naive qed rescaling @xmath61 requirement central photon dramatic increase @xmath55 ratio table tab:2 comparable statistical significances signal with and without photon obtained integrated luminosity @xmath62 fb@xmath63 impact few main reducible backgrounds for @xmath64 studied moderate @xmath41 & 120 @xmath42 gev @xmath43 gev + @xmath65 @xmath66 2.6 @xmath66 2.0 1.3 + @xmath67 @xmath66 3.5 @xmath66 2.8 @xmath451.9 + enhancing @xmath55 ratio coherence effects in @xmath68 curb contribution @xmath69 boson fusion diagrams @xmath70 @xcite @xmath71 production at lhc determination @xmath72 coupling @xmath3 coupling analysis include parton - shower effectslatter expected differentiate signal background final state topology composition preliminary analysis showering central - jet veto effects improvement @xmath73 factor two inclusion complete showering hadronization detector simulations needed establish potential process @xmath68 collaborators emidio gabrielli fabio maltoni mauro moretti fulvio piccinini roberto pittau enjoyable time results research supported rtn european programmes mrtn - ct-2006 - 035505 mrtn - ct-2004 - 503369 quest unification
| 0.347345
| 2,256
| 1,207
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,272
|
the kerr - newman black hole solution can be constructed straightforwardly as the unique solution to the boundary value problem of the einstein - maxwell equations corresponding to an asymptotically flat , stationary and axisymmetric electro - vacuum spacetime surrounding a connected killing horizon .
|
it was shown in ref . that the complex ernst potentials@xcite on the symmetry axis of an asymptotically flat , stationary and axisymmetric electro - vacuum spacetime surrounding a connected killing horizon ( including the case of a degenerate horizon ) can be constructed uniquely by means of the inverse scattering method@xcite .
this provides a new proof of the kerr - newman black hole uniqueness since the full solution can straightforwardly be derived from the axis data , cf .
here we present a particular method for obtaining the ernst potentials off the axis , see sec .
the stationary and axisymmetric einstein - maxwell vacuum equations are equivalent to the ernst equations@xcite @xmath0 @xmath1 where @xmath2 and @xmath3 are weyl coordinates and a bar denotes complex conjugation .
these equations are the integrability condition of a related linear problem ( lp)@xcite : @xmath4{\bf y}\ , , \ ] ] @xmath5{\bf y}\ ] ] @xmath6 @xmath7 @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the complex `` spectral parameter '' .
on the upper part of the symmetry axis ( @xmath10 , @xmath11 ) , denoted by @xmath12 , a suitably normalized solution to the lp for the black hole problem ( horizon at @xmath10 , @xmath13 ) reads@xcite @xmath14 where we have assumed @xmath15 for @xmath16 . the ernst potentials @xmath17 and
@xmath18 on @xmath12 are given by @xmath19 together with the parameter relation @xmath20 where @xmath21 , @xmath22 and @xmath23 denote mass , angular momentum and charge .
the functions @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 and @xmath27 are given by @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30
using the relation@xcite @xmath31 together with @xmath32 we are led from to the following ansatz for @xmath33 : @xmath34 with @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 @xmath39 a careful discussion of the regularity conditions at @xmath40 leads to a set of linear algebraic equations which uniquely determine the unknowns @xmath41 , @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 and @xmath46 .
according to , @xmath47 is given by @xmath48 .
the resulting ernst potentials are the well - known expressions @xmath49 with boyer - lindquist coordinates @xmath50 and @xmath51 related to our weyl coordinates @xmath2 and @xmath3 by @xmath52
|
shown complex ernst potentials on symmetry axis flat stationary axisymmetric electro - vacuum spacetime surrounding connected killing horizon constructed inverse scattering method proof kerr - newman black hole uniqueness full solution derived from axis data method for obtaining ernst potentials off axis stationary axisymmetric einstein - maxwell vacuum equations equivalent to ernst equations @xmath0 @xmath1 @xmath2 @xmath3 are weyl coordinates bar denotes complex conjugation equations integrability condition of related linear problem @xmath4 @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath9 complex spectral parameter upper part symmetry axis @xmath12 normalized solution to for black hole problem reads @xmath14 assumed @xmath15 for @xmath16 ernst potentials @xmath17 @xmath18 on @xmath12 given by @xmath19 parameter relation @xmath20 @xmath21 denote mass angular momentum chargefunctions @xmath24 given by @xmath28 relation@xcite @xmath31 @xmath32 led ansatz for @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 discussion regularity conditions at @xmath40 leads to linear algebraic equations determine unknowns @xmath41 @xmath47 given by @xmath48 ernst potentials are expressions @xmath49 with boyer - lindquist coordinates @xmath50 @xmath51 related to weyl coordinates @xmath2 @xmath3 by @xmath52
| 0.127404
| 595
| 296
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,288
|
there is apparently a widespread belief that the gravitational field ( and subsequently the rotation curve ) `` inside '' razor - thin , axially symmetric disks can not be determined accurately from elliptic integrals because of the singular kernel in the poisson integral . here
, we report a simple and powerful method to achieve this task numerically using the technique of `` density splitting '' .
|
one of the oldest problem in galactic dynamics is the determination of the mass distribution in the stellar and gaseous disk from observed velocities .
observationally , noisy measurements along with a certain velocity dispersion makes this inverse problem difficult to solve ( beauvais & bothum , 2001 ) . from a theoretical point of view , various levels of approximation are possible . for instance , the inversion is straightforward if the disk is considered as a flattened spheroid , since the surface density is simply obtained by an inverse abel transform over the velocity field ( brandt , 1960 ) .
flattened spheroids are however a poor representation of real disks ( e.g. kochanek 2001 ) .
another , more intuitive way to proceed is to generate a collection of surface density profiles , then to determine the corresponding potential or gravitational field , and find only those which model the velocity data at best . for a razor - thin axi - symmetrical disk , only one numerical quadrature over its radial extent must be performed to obtain the potential or the field , which is a priori very convenient because time in - expansive .
meanwhile , this operation is commonly believed to be numerically uncomfortable when using elliptic integrals ( binney & tremaine , 1987 , cuddeford , 1993 , kochanek , 2001 ) .
the reason is that these functions contain a singularity everywhere in the source . as suggested by binney & tremaine ( 1987 ) ,
this drawback can be simply avoided by considering field points located just above / below the equatorial plane .
even if the potential and its radial derivative do generally not exhibit strong variations slightly off the mid - plane , such a vertical shift introduces an inconsistency or a bias . as a matter of fact , instead of elliptic integrals , most authors work with bessel functions which have finite amplitudes ( toomre , 1963 ) .
but their oscillatory behavior and specially their spatial extension ( the infinite range ) are a severe disadvantage from a numerical point of view ( cuddeford , 1993 ; cohl & tohline 1999 ) .
+ in this paper , we show that point mass singularities can be properly and easily handled numerically from elliptic integrals by density splitting . for the case of a disk with zero thickness
as considered here , the gravitational potential and field can be determined exactly in the equatorial plane without any shift , and whatever the surface density profile ( provided it vanishes at the inner and outer edges of the disk ) . the extension to tri - dimensional disks is possible .
for a disk with zero thickness , the expression for the radial gravitational field in the equatorial plane is known in a closed form .
using cylindrical coordinates , this reads ( e.g durand , 1964 ) : @xmath0da , \label{eq : potential}\ ] ] where @xmath1 is the total surface density , @xmath2 is the field point , @xmath3 refers to the material distribution , @xmath4 and @xmath5 are respectively the inner and the outer radius of the disk , and @xmath6 and @xmath7 are respectively defined by @xmath8 and @xmath9 finally , @xmath10 ( respectively @xmath11 ) is the complete elliptic integral of the first ( resp .
second ) kind . note that the integrand of equation ( [ eq : potential ] ) diverges as the modulus @xmath12 , namely when @xmath13 .
the nature of the singularity is twofold : a logarithmic singularity due to the @xmath10-function , and a hyperbolic one due to the term @xmath14 .
however , this singularity is integrable .
there are different ways to estimate improper integrals .
here is a simple and efficient recipe .
let us write the surface density as @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the surface density at the field point and @xmath17 is the `` residual '' surface density which , by construction , equals zero when @xmath18 .
thus , equation ( [ eq : potential ] ) can be written as the sum of two contributions , namely : @xmath19 where @xmath20da \label{eq : hom}\ ] ] is the radial gravitational field due to a radially homogeneous disk and @xmath21da \label{eq:1}\ ] ] corresponds to the residual profile .
the point is that the expression for @xmath22 also exists in a closed analytical form ( see appendix [ sec : appena ] ) .
this quantity is finite everywhere inside the disk , even at the disc edges provided that @xmath16 vanishes continuously there .
it is important to mention that this restriction is no more necessary if we consider the disk as a tri - dimensional system . besides
, @xmath23 can be easily computed numerically because both @xmath24 and @xmath25 are fully regular whatever @xmath3 and @xmath2 , and especially for @xmath18 ( see appendix [ sec : appenb ] for a proof ) . as a consequence ,
the accuracy on @xmath23 ( and subsequently on the total field @xmath26 ) depends only on the performance of the quadrature scheme used to performed the radial integral in equation ( [ eq:1 ] ) . in figure
[ figure ] , we illustrate this simple and efficient technique by considering a disk with inner edge @xmath27 , outer edge @xmath28 and surface density @xmath29 as commonly used to model spiral galaxies ( freeman , 1970 ) .
the graph shows the residual profile @xmath30 , as well as the two regular functions @xmath24 and @xmath25 . here
, the field point where stands the singularity is arbitrarily set to @xmath31 ( about the middle of the disk ) .
we can now apply this method to compute the rotation law @xmath32 of any disk , whatever its size and surface density profile . here
, we simply assume that the contribution to the rotation is only gravitation ( and neglect pressure and viscosity effects ) .
thus , @xmath32 is defined by the relation @xmath33 where : @xmath34 and @xmath35 using the previous expressions for the radial field , these two terms respectively read : @xmath36-{\bf e}\left(\frac{r_{\rm in}}{r}\right)+{\bf k}\left(\frac{r_{\rm in}}{r}\right)\right\ } \label{eq : omegahomo}\ ] ] and @xmath37da \label{eq:2}\ ] ] these two expressions are easy to compute numerically , for reasons mentioned above .
let us remind that at the edges , @xmath38 vanishes because @xmath39 as assumed ( see above ) .
we have reported a simple and efficient method to compute the radial field and the rotation curve of any razor - thin axi - symmetric disk in the mid - plane , using complete elliptic integrals . as a matter of fact
, a similar treatment can be considered for the gravitational potential .
even , this splitting technique can be employed to disks with finite ( non - zero ) thickness as suggested in hur ( 2003 ) , and to the fully tri - dimensional systems as well ( pierens & hur 2004 ) .
abramowitz , m. & stegun , i. a. 1970 , handbook of mathematical functions , new york : dover , 1970 beauvais , c. & bothun , g. 2001 , , 136 , 41 binney , j. & tremaine , s. 1987 , princeton , nj , princeton university press , 1987 , 747 p. brandt , j. c. 1960 , , 131 , 293 cohl , h. s. & tohline , j. e. 1999 , , 527 , 86 durand e. , 1964 , in _ `` electrostatique i. les distributions '' _ , masson ed .
freeman , k. c. 1970 , , 160 , 811 gradshteyn , i. s. & ryzhik , i. m. 1980 , new york : academic press , 1980 .
hur j - m . , 2003 ,
submitted to pierens a. , & hur j.m .
, 2004 , in preparation kochanek c.s . , 2001 ,
submitted ( astro - ph/0108162 ) toomre , a. 1963 , , 138 , 385 sofue , y. & rubin , v. 2001 , , 39 , 137
let us begin with the expression for the radial field due to a disk with constant surface density , i.e. equation ( [ eq : hom ] ) .
this expression can be written as follows : @xmath40da+\int_{r}^{r_{\rm out}}\sqrt\frac{a}{r}k\left[\frac{{\bf e}(k)}{\varpi}-{\bf k}(k)\right]da\right\ } \label{eq : grhom}\ ] ] we can now set @xmath41 in the first integral and @xmath42 in the second one . changing the modulus in the elliptic integrals according to ( gradshteyn & ryzhik , 1980 ) : @xmath43 and @xmath44\ ] ] with @xmath45 and @xmath46 , then equation ( [ eq : grhom ] )
becomes : @xmath47 \label{eq : grhom2}\ ] ] each integral in this expression is known .
actually , we have ( gradshteyn & ryzhik , 1980 ) : @xmath48 and @xmath49 inserting these relations into equation ( [ eq : grhom2 ] ) and re - arranging terms yields the formula @xmath50-{\bf e}\left(\frac{r_{\rm in}}{r}\right)+{\bf k}\left(\frac{r_{\rm in}}{r}\right)\right\}\ ] ]
in order to compute numerically equations ( [ eq:1 ] ) and ( [ eq:2 ] ) , we have to check that @xmath24 and @xmath25 remain finite when @xmath13 , which is not obvious at first glance .
since @xmath51 by construction , a taylor expansion of @xmath52 around @xmath18 yields : @xmath53
|
oldest problem in galactic dynamics is determination mass distribution in stellar gaseous disk from velocities noisy measurements velocity dispersion inverse problem difficult ( beauvais & bothum 2001 ) theoretical levels approximation possible inversion straightforward if disk flattened spheroid surface density obtained by inverse abel transform over velocity field ( brandt , 1960 ) flattened spheroids poor representation of real disks ( kochanek 2001 ) intuitive generate surface density profiles determine potential gravitational field find those velocity data for thin axi - symmetrical disk one numerical quadrature over radial extent performed to obtain potential field convenient time in - expansive operation numerically uncomfortable using elliptic integrals ( binney tremaine 1987 cuddeford 1993 kochanek 2001 functions contain singularity source drawback avoided by considering field points above / below equatorial plane potential radial derivative vertical shift introduces inconsistency bias instead of elliptic integrals authors work with bessel functions finite amplitudes ( toomre , 1963 )oscillatory behavior spatial extension infinite range disadvantage numerical ( cuddeford 1993 cohl & tohline 1999 ) paper point mass singularities handled numerically from elliptic integrals by density splitting disk with zero thickness gravitational potential field determined in equatorial plane without shift surface density profile vanishes at inner outer edges extension to tri - disks possible disk zero thickness expression radial gravitational field equatorial plane known closed form cylindrical coordinates reads durand 1964 : @xmath0da potential @xmath1 total surface density @xmath2 field point @xmath3 material distribution @xmath4 @xmath5 inner outer radius disk @xmath6 @xmath7 defined by @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 ) complete elliptic integral first second kind integrand of equation potential diverges as modulus @xmath12 @xmath13 singularity twofold logarithmic due to @xmath10-function hyperbolic @xmath14 singularity integrable different ways to estimate improper integrals simple efficient recipewrite surface density as @xmath15 @xmath16 at field point @xmath17 residual surface density equals zero when @xmath18 equation ( potential written as sum of two contributions @xmath19 @xmath20da is radial gravitational field due to homogeneous disk @xmath21da residual profile expression for @xmath22 exists in closed analytical form see appendix quantity finite inside disk even at disc edges @xmath16 vanishes continuously restriction no necessary if consider disk as tri - dimensional system @xmath23 easily computed numerically @xmath24 @xmath25 fully regular whatever @xmath3 @xmath2 especially @xmath18 see appendix proof accuracy on @xmath23 total field @xmath26 ) depends on performance of quadrature scheme radial integral in equation eq:1 figure ] technique considering disk with inner edge @xmath27 outer edge @xmath28 surface density @xmath29 model spiral galaxies graph shows residual profile @xmath30 two regular functions @xmath24 and @xmath25 field point singularity set to @xmath31 middle of diskapply method compute rotation law @xmath32 of disk size surface density profile assume contribution rotation gravitation neglect pressure viscosity effects @xmath32 defined by relation @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 previous expressions radial field terms read : @xmath36-\bf e}\left(+ k}{eq omegahomo @xmath37da {eq:2} expressions easy to compute numerically edges @xmath38 vanishes @xmath39 assumed reported simple method to compute radial field rotation curve of razor - thin axi - symmetric disk mid - plane using elliptic integrals similar treatment for gravitational potential splitting technique employed disks with finite non - zero thickness fully tri - systems 2004 abramowitz . stegun 1970 handbook of mathematical functions new york dover beauvais c. bothun g 2001 136 , 41 binney j. tremaine s. 1987 princeton university press 747 p brandt , j. c. 1960 131 , 293 cohl h..tohline j. e. 1999 527 , 86 durand e. 1964 electrostatique distributions masson ed freeman k. c. 1970 160 , 811 gradshteyn ryzhik 1980 new york academic press hur j - m . 2003 submitted pierens a. hur j.m. 2004 kochanek c.s . 2001 submitted astro - ph/0108162 ) toomre 1963 138 , sofue rubin v 2001 39 , 137 expression radial field disk constant surface density equation ( eq : hom ] ) @xmath40da+_{r : grhom set @xmath41 first integral @xmath42 second changing modulus elliptic integrals gradshteyn ryzhik 1980 @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 equation eq : grhom becomes @xmath47 {eq : grhom2 each integral knowngradshteyn & ryzhik 1980 ) @xmath48 @xmath49 inserting relations into equation eq grhom2 re - arranging terms yields formula @xmath50-{\bf e\left()+ k} compute equations eq:1 eq:2 ] check @xmath24 @xmath25 remain finite @xmath13 not obvious @xmath51 construction expansion of @xmath52 around @xmath18 yields @xmath53
| 0.34954
| 2,285
| 1,174
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,293
|
we discuss the possibility of using experiments timing the propagation of neutrino beams over large distances to help determine the absolute masses of the three neutrinos .
|
determining the absolute values of the three neutrino masses is a subject of great interest .
historically , pauli introduced the concept of the neutrino in order to explain why the energy of the emitted electron in beta decay did not have a single value as expected for a two body final state , but had a spectrum of energies ( for different observations of the process ) .
fermi then suggested experimentally determining the mass of the neutrino by precisely measuring the electron s energy spectrum in the endpoint region .
this procedure has yielded steadily decreasing upper bounds on neutrino mass for more than half a century .
it has however turned out to be difficult to reach the range suggested by the cosmology bound @xcite for the three different neutrinos now known to exist : @xmath0 this bound is based on the gravitational force exerted by neutrinos in the universe rather than directly from neutrino kinematics .. however , heroic efforts @xcite - @xcite are continuing to make steady progress on finding the neutrino masses using the kinematics of the tritium beta decay reaction .
one of course has the associated problem of finding the masses of all three neutrino mass eigenstates .
the neutrino oscillation experiments @xcite - @xcite have determined these mass differences up to an ambiguity of either a normal " or an inverse " hierarchy . specifically , @xmath1 where the numbers have been taken from the recent review @xcite . of course
, the two hierarchies correspond to the two possible signs of @xmath2 .
evidently , measuring any combination of three neutrino masses which is independent of @xmath3 and @xmath4 should determine , for each hierarchy choice , the values of all three neutrino masses .
here we would like to discuss some aspects related to the possibility of finding the separate ( or absolute " ) neutrino masses with the help of experiments measuring neutrino velocities by timing laboratory - made neutrino beams traveling from one point to another . at the moment , and for the near future , these are thought experiments " .
however , thinking about them , raises a number of interesting questions .
if there were just a single neutrino it is clear that we could trivially " find its mass , @xmath5 by measuring its velocity , @xmath6 as well as its energy , @xmath7 and using einstein s formula : @xmath8 where we are working in units where the velocity of light , @xmath9 and @xmath10 , appropriate to neutrinos traveling just slightly less than the speed of light . for definiteness , in the realistic 3-neutrino world , we assume a neutrino beam initiated in association with muons and detected , after traveling a measured time and distance , by produced muons .
we designate this as a mu - neutrino type beam .
now we must take account of the fact that the laboratory neutrino beam in this setup corresponds to working with a neutrino flavor " eigenstate ( of muonic type ) rather than a mass eigenstate .
a prescription is therefore required to define what might be called the averaged neutrino mass " @xmath5 which enters into eq .
( [ einfor ] ) when we want to use it in the 3-flavor world . in quantum mechanics
the mu - type neutrino corresponds to a linear combination of the three mass eigenstates : @xmath11 where the @xmath12 s are approximately the elements of the leptonic mixing matrix . in models ,
say for the case of majorana neutrinos , the mixing results from bringing anoriginal " mass matrix @xmath13 to diagonal form @xmath14 , @xmath15 where @xmath16 is unitary .
the to - be - measured " mass , m will thus be interpreted @xcite as the averaged " quantity , @xmath17 where the repeated index , @xmath18 should be summed over .
we also have assumed for simplicity that the @xmath19 s are real . as a check of this formula ,
one notes that if the neutrinos did nt mix we would have @xmath20 and @xmath21 .
present experimental information on the angles " which parameterize the matrix @xmath16 are summarized in ref .
@xcite translating these angles to the needed matrix elements , @xmath22 yields the numerical values with estimated errors : @xmath23 eq .
( [ avmass ] ) then explicitly gives the to - be - measured quantity , @xmath5 as a different combination of the masses than those in eq .
( [ massdif ] ) . thus combining the three equations we can find the absolute neutrino masses for each hierarchy choice .
for example , we may eliminate @xmath24 and @xmath25 in terms of @xmath26 by using eqs .
( [ massdif ] ) to get @xmath27 here the plus sign corresponds to the normal hierarchy choice and the minus sign corresponds to the inverted hierarchy choice .
for the normal hierarchy we can , using this equation , obtain the curve in fig 1 while for the inverted hierarchy we obtain the curve in fig .
2 . thus if an average mass , m is measured by a long baseline time of flight experiment , we can read @xmath26 from this curve and find also ( from the known differences above ) , both @xmath24 and @xmath25 .
this should be done for both hierarchy assumptions ; the present method does not determine which hierarchy is the one nature chooses . of course , there are some important experimental errors introduced in this determination .
it is expected that further experimental measurements of neutrino oscillations will substantially improve the experimental accuracy .
this procedure thus appears to be able to reasonably solve the problem of relating the averaged " mass , @xmath5 measured by using eq.([avmass ] ) to the three neutrino mass eigenvalues @xmath28 .
however , we are not done since we should pay some attention to the accuracy to which @xmath5 itself can be determined .
it should be remarked that the need to take mixtures of mass eigenstates into account is also evident in the electron endpoint of beta decay method for absolute neutrino mass determination . in that case
the @xmath29 s appear instead of the @xmath22 s ; see for example eq .
( 21 ) of @xcite .
next , we discuss the needed determination of the averaged mass , @xmath5 by a long baseline time of flight measurement . first the mu - neutrino , @xmath30 must be produced .
we would like to select the @xmath30 to have as small an energy as possible in order that it travel at as low a speed , @xmath6 as possible .
an at least conceptually convenient source in this context might use the decay process : @xmath31 by selecting the @xmath32 and @xmath33 momenta one can reduce the energy of the @xmath30 and hence its speed , @xmath6 .
that would make a precise time measurement easier . from eq .
( [ einfor ] ) , the deviation of the neutrino s speed from that of light is given by : @xmath34 if one were to select the neutrino energy to be 1 mev , this would result in @xmath35 to be of the order of @xmath36 .
that corresponds to a deviation from the velocity of light in the fourteenth decimal place , which does not seem practical .
however , if one were able to get enough data with a neutrino energy selected to be 1 kev , @xmath35 would be of the order of @xmath37 which should be measurable .
we have shown how measurements of , for example , a mu - neutrino beam velocity and energy can be used to help in the determination of the absolute masses of the presently known three neutrinos .
this could be a supplement to the determinations obtained using the endpoint of tritium beta decay method . of course , an important question is the accuracy which can be achieved .
in addition to the accuracy of the velocity and energy measurements of the beam it is important to increase the accuracy of the neutrino mass differences and the lepton mixing matrix elements obtained via neutrino oscillation experiments . a recent review of these is given in @xcite .
-.5 cm this work was supported in part by the u. s. doe under contract no .
de - fg-02 - 85er 40231 .
one of us ( js ) would like to thank prof .
f. sannino and the members of the cp@xmath38 origins group at southern denmark university for their helpful discussions , warm hospitality and partial support ..
|
determining absolute values three neutrino masses subject interest pauli introduced concept neutrino energy emitted electron in beta decay single value spectrum of energies fermi suggested determining mass neutrino by measuring electron s energy spectrum in endpoint region procedure yielded decreasing upper bounds neutrino mass for half a century difficult to reach range cosmology bound @xcite for three neutrinos : @xmath0 bound based on gravitational force neutrinos neutrino kinematics efforts progress on finding neutrino masses using kinematics tritium beta decay reaction problem finding masses all three neutrino mass eigenstates neutrino oscillation experiments @xcite determined mass differences ambiguity normal or inverse hierarchy specifically @xmath1 numbers taken from recent review two hierarchies correspond to two signs of @xmath2 measuring combination three neutrino masses independent of @xmath3 and @xmath4 should determine values all three neutrino masses discuss aspects possibility finding separate neutrino masses with experiments measuring neutrino velocities by timing laboratory - made neutrino beamsmoment future thought experiments raises questions if single neutrino could find its mass by measuring velocity @xmath6 energy @xmath7 using einstein s formula working in units velocity of light @xmath9 @xmath10 appropriate to neutrinos traveling slightly less than speed light in realistic 3-neutrino world assume neutrino beam initiated with muons detected by muons mu - neutrino type beam laboratory neutrino beam corresponds to working with neutrino flavor eigenstate muonic type mass eigenstate prescription required to define averaged neutrino mass @xmath5 in 3-flavor world in quantum mechanics mu - type neutrino corresponds to linear combination of three mass eigenstates @xmath11 @xmath12 elements of leptonic mixing matrix in models majorana neutrinos mixing results from mass matrix @xmath13 to diagonal form @xmath14 @xmath15 @xmath16 is unitary to - be - measured mass m interpreted as averaged quantity @xmath17 repeated index @xmath18 summed over assumed @xmath19 s are realcheck formula if neutrinos mix @xmath20 @xmath21 experimental information angles matrix @xmath16 summarized in ref @xcite translating angles to matrix elements @xmath22 yields numerical values with estimated errors @xmath23 eq ( avmass ] gives - measured quantity @xmath5 different combination masses eq ( massdif ] combining three equations find absolute neutrino masses for each hierarchy choice eliminate @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 using eqs. ( [ massdif ] ) get @xmath27 plus sign corresponds normal hierarchy minus inverted hierarchy normal hierarchy curve in fig 1 inverted hierarchy curve in fig . 2 if average mass m measured by long baseline time flight experiment read @xmath26 from curve find @xmath24 and @xmath25 for both hierarchy assumptions method determine hierarchy important experimental errors further measurements neutrino oscillations improve accuracy procedure problem relating averaged mass @xmath5 measured eq.([avmass ] ) to three neutrino mass eigenvalues @xmath28not done attention to accuracy @xmath5 need to mixtures mass eigenstates evident in electron endpoint beta decay method for absolute neutrino mass determination @xmath29 s appear instead of @xmath22 s see eq . ( 21 ) of @xcite discuss determination of averaged mass @xmath5 by long baseline time of flight measurement mu - neutrino @xmath30 must be produced select @xmath30 small energy low speed @xmath6 source might use decay process : @xmath31 selecting @xmath32 and @xmath33 momenta reduce energy @xmath30 speed @xmath6 precise time measurement easier eq . deviation of neutrino s speed from light by @xmath34 neutrino energy 1 mev @xmath35 order of @xmath36 to deviation from velocity light in fourteenth decimal place not practical if enough data with neutrino energy 1 kev @xmath35 order of @xmath37 measurable shown measurements of mu - neutrino beam velocity and energy in determination absolute masses of three neutrinos supplement to determinations endpoint tritium beta decay methodimportant question accuracy velocity energy measurements increase neutrino mass differences lepton mixing matrix elements neutrino oscillation experiments recent review in @xcite . -.5 cm work supported by u. s. doe contract no de - fg-02 - 85er 40231 js prof . f. sannino members cp@xmath38 origins group southern denmark university for discussions hospitality support
| 0.311108
| 1,845
| 928
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,297
|
the projected multiplicity function of galaxies gives ( per square degree ) the density of galaxy aggregates formed by n members .
we use the cronario matched catalogues to derive the low n ( @xmath0 ) multiplicity function from d - poss data .
the van albada ( 1982 ) algorithm was implemented and used to identify candidate groups in the cronario catalogues . in absence of redshift surveys
complete down to the magnitude limit of the dposs material and covering a wide enough area , the performances of the algorithm were tested on realistically simulated catalogues .
+ the application to a set of 13 cronario catalogues allowed us to derive a multiplicity function as accurate as those available in literature obtained from redshift surveys .
# 1 # 2 _ mem .
soc .
astron .
it .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ the messenger _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
nach . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys .
lett . _ * # 1 * , l#2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys .
rev . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
astrophys .
suppl .
ser . _
* # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astron .
j. _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ ann .
rev .
astron .
astrophys . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
j. _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
j. lett .
_ * # 1 * , l#2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
j. suppl . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ astrophys .
space sci .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ adv .
space res .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ bull .
astron .
inst .
czechosl . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ j. quant .
spectrosc .
. transfer _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ mon . not .
r. astr
. soc . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ mem .
r. astr .
soc . _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ phys .
lett .
rev .
_ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ publ .
astron .
soc . japan _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ publ .
astr .
soc .
pacific _ * # 1 * , # 2 # 1 # 2 _ nature _ * # 1 * , # 2 epsf.sty
|
the multiplicity function ( hereafter mf ) is a powerful tool to test the various cosmological scenarios ( combes & boiss 1991 ) and provides an independent way to measure the index @xmath1 of the initial perturbation spectrum @xmath1 at the era of baryonic recombination ( turner , gott iii 1976 ) . + the cronario project is a joint enterprise among caltech and the astronomical observatories of napoli , roma and rio de janeiro , aimed to produce the first general catalogue of all objects visible on the dposs ( digitised palomar sky survey ) .
the final palomar - norris catalogue will include astrometric , photometric ( in the three gunn - thuan bands g , r and i ) and rough morphological information for an estimated @xmath2 stars and @xmath3 galaxies .
more than @xmath4 of the catalogues are already available and are currently being used for many scientific applications .
in order to compile a catalog of candidate groups of galaxies in absence of redshift information , we implemented a slightly modified version of the van albada algorithm ( soares 1989 ) .
+ this algorithm makes use of apparent magnitude and projected position in the sky only , and gives , for each pair of adjacent galaxies , their probability of being physically related .
+ assuming a poisson statistic , the probability that the angular distance of a fixed galaxy to its nearest non - physical companion lies between @xmath5 and @xmath6 is given by : @xmath7 \cdot 2 \pi \theta n d\theta.\ ] ] the introduction of an adimensional distance @xmath8 ( defined as the ratio of the observed to the expected mean distance to the nearest neighbour ) allows to combine the angular separation of different pairs into a single distribution ( fig .
[ fig : poisson ] ) removing the effects of clustering in the background .
+ = 9.0 cm
in order to test the accuracy ( lost groups ) and the reliability ( spurious groups ) of the algorithm , we tested it on @xmath9 realistically simulated sky fields .
+ we first produced the galaxy background by assuming uniform distribution and the field luminosity function given by metcalfe et al .
1994 ; then we added simulated groups of galaxies according to the multiplicity function by turner & gott iii 1976 , with redshift computed according to : @xmath10\ ] ] and absolute magnitude of the brightest galaxy in the group taken from the cumulative luminosity function for groups of galaxies : @xmath11^{\alpha+1 } \cdot exp \left [ -10^{\left ( 0.4 \left ( m^*-m \right ) \right ) } \right ] dm\ ] ] where @xmath12 and @xmath13 .
other parameters which were varied in the course of the simulations were : * the diameter of the group inside a gaussian distribution centered at : @xmath14 ; * the maximum possible redshift for a group , which were assumed to fall in the range : @xmath15 .
different simulations were performed in order to optimize the lower limit of the probability for which two galaxies were considered as physical companions by the algorithm . the optimal value , i d est the value ensuring the best compromise between accuracy and reliability ( fig .
[ fig : prob ] ) , turned out to be @xmath16 .
+ with this choice , the modified van albada algorithm succeds in retrieving , from the simulated catalogues , more than @xmath17 of the groups having more than three components .
+ = 12.0 cm
the figure ( fig . [ fig : disc ] ) gives the mf obtained from @xmath18 cronario plates ( subtending a total solid angle of @xmath19 ) . in the same figure
we also compare it with six other mfs taken from literature : 1 . *
mf derived from magnitude limited surveys making use of redshift information : * * garcia * ( garcia et al . 1993 ) , * cfa * ( geller & huchra 1983 ) , * northcfa * ( ramella , pisani 1997 ) , * esp * ( ramella et al .
1998 ) 2 . *
mf derived from diameter limited survey : maia * ( maia & da costa 1989 ) 3 . *
mf derived from limited magnitude survey without redshift information : turner * ( turner & gott 1976 ) agreement is found between our fm , obtained with our algorithm without any tridimensional data , and the ones in literature using redshift information . therefore , with our algorithm , even in absence of redshift information , it is possible to explore wide areas of the sky and to retrieve groups ( @xmath20 ) with an efficiency comparable to that of 3-d surveys .
+ = 6.5 cm
for the groups with at least one redshift available , mf ( as a function of luminosity ) was calculated . with a fit of the observed data to the theoretical function
@xmath21 we obtained : @xmath22 + this allows an estimate of the spectral index @xmath1 : @xmath23
|
multiplicity function mf ) tool cosmological scenarios ( combes boiss 1991 ) index @xmath1 of initial perturbation spectrum at baryonic recombination ( turner gott 1976 ) cronario project joint enterprise caltech astronomical observatories of napoli roma rio de janeiro first general catalogue of objects visible on dposs survey final palomar - norris catalogue astrometric photometric morphological information for estimated @xmath2 stars @xmath3 galaxies more than @xmath4 catalogues available used for scientific applications compile catalog galaxies implemented modified van albada algorithm soares 1989 ) algorithm apparent magnitude projected position gives each adjacent galaxies probability of physically related assuming poisson statistic probability angular distance of fixed galaxy to nearest non - physical companion between @xmath5 and @xmath6 given by @xmath7 2 \theta n d introduction of adimensional distance @xmath8 ratio observed to expected mean distance to nearest neighbour allows angular separation of pairs into single distribution ( fig . poisson removing effects clustering test accuracy reliability algorithm tested on @xmath9 simulated sky fieldsproduced galaxy background assuming uniform distribution field luminosity function by metcalfe et al . 1994 added simulated groups of galaxies multiplicity function by turner & gott 1976 redshift computed to @xmath10 absolute magnitude of brightest galaxy from cumulative luminosity function for : @xmath11^{\alpha+1 } exp -10 0.4 @xmath12 and @xmath13 parameters varied diameter of group inside gaussian distribution at @xmath14 maximum possible redshift for group range : @xmath15 . simulations performed optimize lower limit probability for two galaxies as physical companions optimal value compromise between accuracy reliability @xmath16 . modified van albada algorithm retrieving from simulated catalogues more than @xmath17 of groups having more than three components 12.0 cm figure gives mf from @xmath18 cronario plates subtending total solid angle of @xmath19 ) with six other mfs literature : mf derived from magnitude limited surveys redshift information garcia * ( 1993 cfa * geller huchra 1983 northcfa ramella pisani 1997 esp * ramella1998 2 mf derived from diameter limited survey maia da costa 1989 3 mf limited magnitude survey without redshift information turner 1976 ) agreement between our fm algorithm without tridimensional data literature using redshift information our algorithm redshift explore wide areas sky retrieve groups @xmath20 efficiency comparable 3-d surveys + = 6.5 cm groups redshift mf function luminosity calculated observed data theoretical function @xmath21 obtained @xmath22 estimate spectral index @xmath1 @xmath23
| 0.18325
| 1,105
| 568
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,299
|
we use monte carlo techniques and analytical methods to study the phase diagram of the @xmath0component widom rowlinson model on the bcc lattice : there are @xmath0 species all with the same fugacity @xmath1 and a nearest neighbor hard core exclusion between unlike particles .
simulations show that for @xmath2 there is a `` crystal phase '' for @xmath1 lying between @xmath3 and @xmath4 while for @xmath5 there are @xmath0 demixed phases each consisting mostly of one species . for @xmath6
there is a direct second order transition from the gas phase to the demixed phase while for @xmath2 the transition at @xmath4 appears to be first order putting it in the potts model universality class .
for @xmath0 large , pirogov - sinai theory gives @xmath7 . in the crystal phase
the particles preferentially occupy one of the sublattices , independent of species , i.e. spatial symmetry but not particle symmetry is broken . for @xmath8
this transition approaches that of the one component hard cube gas with fugacity @xmath9 .
we find by direct simulations of such a system a transition at @xmath10 which is consistent with the simulation @xmath3 for large @xmath0 .
this transition appears to be always of the ising type .
|
the widom rowlinson ( wr ) model , introduced in 1970 @xcite as an ingeniously simple model for the study of phase transitions in continuum fluids ( for an overview see ref .
@xcite ) , continues to be , like its authors , a rich source of insights and analytical results in many ( sometimes quite unexpected ) areas @xcite of statistical mechanics . in this paper , dedicated with great pleasure to ben widom on the occasion of his seventieth birthday
, we continue our study of a variation of the original model from two to @xmath0 components on a lattice : hard core exclusion between particles of different species on nearest neighbor sites .
this model was first considered by runnels and lebowitz @xcite who proved that when the number of components @xmath0 is larger than some minimum @xmath11 then the transition from the gas phase at small values of @xmath1 to the demixed phase at large values of @xmath1 does not take place directly .
instead there is , at intermediate values of @xmath1 , @xmath12 , an ordered phase in which one of the sublattices ( even or odd ) is preferentially occupied , i.e. there is a crystalline ( antiferromagnetically ordered ) phase in which the average particle density on the even and odd sublattices , @xmath13 and @xmath14 are unequal .
the average density , @xmath15 , of species @xmath16 , on each sublattice is the same for each @xmath17 , with @xmath18 and @xmath19 .
the nature of the symmetry breaking is thus very different from that in the demixed phase at @xmath20 where @xmath21 but there exists one species , say @xmath22 , for which @xmath23 .
the origin of this crystalline phase is purely entropic . for @xmath1
fixed and @xmath0 large `` it pays '' for the system `` entropy wise '' to occupy just one sublattice without any constraint ; since there are no interactions between particles on the same sublattice there are @xmath0 independent choices at each site if we keep one of the sublattices empty . this more than compensates , at some @xmath24 , for the `` loss '' of `` fugacity energy '' occasioned by keeping down the density in one of the sublattices .
a natural question now arises , just how big does @xmath11 have to be to see this ordered phase for @xmath25 .
it was shown in @xcite that on the square lattice @xmath26 ; a ridiculously large upper bound . on the other hand a direct computation on the bethe lattice @xcite with @xmath27neighbors gives @xmath28 ^ 2 $ ] , which would suggest @xmath29 for the square lattice , @xmath30 for the cubic and @xmath31 for the bcc lattice .
now it can be shown , using fkg inequalities , that @xmath32 on any bipartite lattice @xcite , but beyond that we have no simple or convincing argument for finding @xmath11 .
we therefore turned to monte carlo simulations .
this gave on the square lattice @xmath33
@xcite which is only about twice as large as the bethe lattice prediction .
this wetted our appetite to try the bcc lattice where @xmath34 .
to our surprise we find here , using monte carlo simulations , that @xmath11 does indeed equal @xmath35 , on the bcc lattice .
while we have no clue of how to find rigorously the actual value of @xmath11 or of @xmath3 , it was argued in @xcite that for a given @xmath1 and @xmath0 large enough , the typical occupancy pattern on the lattice ( ignoring the label @xmath17 of the particles ) should be like that of a one component lattice gas with nearest neighbor hard core exclusion .
for the latter system dobrushin @xcite proved the existence of a crystalline state .
this implies that @xmath3 should behave for large @xmath0 as @xmath36 , where @xmath37 is the critical fugacity at which the one component hard cube gas ( occupation at a site @xmath38 excludes occupation at all eight neighboring sites ) crystalizes .
the value of @xmath37 for the bcc lattice , obtained by gaunt @xcite using series expansion methods , is @xmath39 . using mc we obtained @xmath40 which is roughly consistent with gaunt s value .
our result also agrees well with the values of @xmath41 for large @xmath0 being approximately @xmath42 for @xmath43 and @xmath44 .
this provides solid evidence for the existence of a reentry phase transition in the temperature magnetic field plane phase diagram of an ising spin system with nearest - neighbor anti - ferromagnetic interactions on the bcc lattice @xcite .
we also find , as in @xcite , that for large @xmath0 , @xmath4 for the crystal demixed transition can be computed via pirogov
sinai theory @xcite yielding , @xmath45 which matches up smoothly with our mc results , see fig .
it is easy to show that there is a demixing transition for @xmath46 @xcite , the existence of sharp interfaces between coexisting phases , for @xmath6 , on the cubic lattice at large fugacity @xmath1 was proven in @xcite .
we next present results of our simulations and refer the reader to @xcite for a more detailed description of the model and additional references .
our mc simulations were carried out on a bcc lattice of size @xmath47 with periodic boundary conditions . on an initially empty lattice we deposit particles chosen at random from the @xmath0 components at fugacity @xmath1 respecting the exclusion of different species occupying neighboring sites .
we then sequentially update the lattice using a checkerboard algorithm resulting in a good vectorization .
an update of a lattice site @xmath48 on one of the two simple cubic sublattices @xmath49 , making up the bcc lattice , which is occupied by a particle of type @xmath17 ( @xmath50 indicating an empty site ) is done as follows : we randomly choose a new trial particle of type @xmath51 , where @xmath51 can have any integer value between @xmath52 and @xmath0 with equal probability .
@xmath53 refers to an attempted removal of a particle @xmath54 from the lattice site , which is successful , if a number @xmath55 randomly chosen with equal probability between @xmath52 and @xmath56 is smaller than the inverse fugacity @xmath57 .
when this occurs @xmath17 gets the value @xmath52 , otherwise it remains unchanged , @xmath58 refers to an attempted deposition of a particle of type @xmath51 .
if @xmath50 then it is successful if each of the four nearest neighbor sites is either empty or occupied by a particle of the same type ( @xmath51 ) and @xmath59 . in this case @xmath17 gets the value @xmath51 , otherwise it remains unchanged .
a direct replacement attempt of a particle @xmath60 surrounded by eight empty nearest neighbor sites is always successful .
typically in a simulation run after an equilibration of @xmath61 monte carlo steps ( mcs ) we update the lattice @xmath62 times , the configuration of every tenth step is taken for the evaluation of the averages . a typical run with @xmath62 mcs took about 1 cpu hours on a cray ymp .
let @xmath63 denote the occupancy of a site , @xmath64 if the site @xmath48 is empty and @xmath65 otherwise . as observables we took histograms @xmath66 of the order parameter @xmath67 for the crystal structure and @xmath68 of the order parameter @xmath69 for the demixed phase in subsystems of size @xmath70 , @xmath71(-1)^{2*s-1 } \label{pc}\ ] ] and @xmath72 where @xmath73 denotes the number of particles of type @xmath17 in a subsystem of size @xmath74 and @xmath75 is the average overall density . for a given @xmath0 the transition activity @xmath76 is found by finite size scaling techniques @xcite . in particular the @xmath77 moments of the order parameter distribution @xmath66
, @xmath78 can be evaluated in subsystems of size @xmath74 , and from them the fourth order cumulant @xcite @xmath79 , in a one phase region far away from a critical point the subsystem size typically can be chosen larger than the correlation length @xmath81 , @xmath82 and the order parameter distribution is to a good approximation a gaussian centered around @xmath52 , resulting in @xmath83 for @xmath84 . in the two phase coexistence region far away from a critical point we can again assume @xmath85 and the order parameter distribution is bimodal resulting in @xmath86 for @xmath84 .
near the critical point however we have @xmath87 , and using scaling arguments @xcite the cumulant is a function of @xmath88 , resulting for @xmath89 in the same value of @xmath90 for all different @xmath91 .
this method allows the efficient determination of critical points by analyzing the cumulants for different values of @xmath1 on different length scales @xmath91 . applied to our model
we should see , for low values of @xmath1 , when the system is in the disordered one phase region , @xmath92 for @xmath93 .
increasing @xmath1 , we obtain , for large enough @xmath0 , a crystal phase with @xmath94 for @xmath95 .
near @xmath76 we expect @xmath96 for @xmath97 .
this method for locating the transition fugacities was used in our previous studies @xcite on the square lattice as well . for @xmath98
we obtain in this way values of @xmath99 respectively , for @xmath100 , @xmath101 and for @xmath102 , @xmath103 .
cumulants for the gas crystal transition of the hard diamond and the @xmath104component system are shown in figs . 1 and 2 , respectively .
the transition points are presented in fig . 3 together with the asymptotic expression @xmath105 .
this corresponds to the value of @xmath37 on the bcc lattice @xmath40 which we obtained using mc techniques .
we also show in fig .
3 a purely empirical fit of the @xmath106corrections for @xmath76 , @xmath107 , to the mc data , with a value of @xmath108 .
the minimum number of components required for the existence of the crystal phase on the bcc lattice is @xmath109 . in fig .
4 we show the approach of the critical fugacity @xmath110 to the limit of the hard diamond system . for @xmath6 we obtain a direct transition from the gas phase to the demixed phase at a transition fugacity of @xmath111 ;
the transition is second order with ising exponents as on a simple cubic lattice studied by dickman et al .
@xcite . for @xmath112
we observe a direct first order transition from the crystal to the demixed phase .
this transition was analyzed by studying the order parameter distribution @xmath68 . in the simulations we find a hysteresis region around @xmath113 ,
going approximately between two values of @xmath1 , say @xmath114 and @xmath115 , when increasing and decreasing the fugacity . in cases of a small hysteresis region with extent of less than @xmath116 ,
@xmath113 was taken as the average of this region , @xmath117 . in cases of a larger hysteresis region
we located the transition fugacity @xmath113 by finding the relative stability of one of the two phases during a simulation starting from configurations with both phases present in parallel slices extending over the length of the simulation box , as described in @xcite .
the resulting phase transition values of @xmath113 are shown in fig . 1 .
we note that with increasing number of components , the transition fugacities approach the exact asymptotic line @xmath118 .
we thank a. mazel for very helpful discussions .
p.n . acknowledges support from the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft ( heisenberg foundation ) , the computations were carried out at the cray - ymp of the rhrk kaiserslautern and the cray - t90 of the hlrz jlich .
j.l.l . was supported by nsf grant dmr 95 - 23266 and dimacs and its supporting agencies , the nsf under contract stc-91 - 19999 and the n.j .
commission on science and technology .
|
widom rowlinson model introduced 1970 for phase transitions in continuum fluids rich source of insights analytical results in statistical mechanics paper dedicated to ben widom seventieth birthday study of variation original model from two to @xmath0 components on lattice exclusion between particles different species on nearest neighbor sites model considered by runnels and lebowitz proved number of components @xmath0 larger than minimum @xmath11 transition from gas phase to demixed phase at large values directly at intermediate values @xmath1 ordered phase one sublattices even or odd preferentially occupied crystalline ordered phase average particle density on even and odd sublattices @xmath14 unequal average density of species @xmath16 on each sublattice same for each @xmath17 @xmath18 and @xmath19 symmetry breaking different from demixed phase at @xmath20 exists one species @xmath22 for @xmath23 origin of crystalline phase purely entropic@xmath1 fixed @xmath0 large pays system occupy one sublattice without constraint no interactions between particles same sublattice @xmath0 independent choices each site if keep one empty compensates @xmath24 loss of fugacity energy keeping down density one question how big @xmath11 see ordered phase for @xmath25 shown @xcite lattice @xmath26 large upper bound direct computation bethe lattice with @xmath27neighbors gives @xmath28 ^ 2 $ ] suggest @xmath29 square lattice @xmath30 cubic @xmath31 bcc lattice shown fkg inequalities @xmath32 on bipartite lattice @xcite no simple argument for finding @xmath11 turned to monte carlo simulations gave square lattice @xmath33 @xcite twice as large as bethe lattice prediction try bcc lattice @xmath34 @xmath11 equal @xmath35 on bcc lattice no how find actual value of @xmath11 or @xmath3 argued @xcite @xmath1 @xmath0 large typical occupancy pattern lattice @xmath17 like one component lattice gas nearest neighbor hard core exclusionlatter system dobrushin @xcite proved crystalline state implies @xmath3 large @xmath0 @xmath36 @xmath37 critical fugacity one component hard cube gas excludes sites crystalizes value @xmath37 bcc lattice obtained is @xmath39 mc obtained @xmath40 consistent with gaunt s value result agrees with values @xmath41 large @xmath0 @xmath42 @xmath43 @xmath44 evidence reentry phase transition temperature magnetic field plane phase diagram ising spin system anti - ferromagnetic interactions bcc lattice @xcite large @xmath0 @xmath4 crystal demixed transition computed via pirogov sinai theory @xcite @xmath45 matches with mc results demixing transition for @xmath46 @xcite sharp interfaces between phases @xmath6 cubic lattice large fugacity @xmath1 proven in @xcite present results simulations refer reader @xcite detailed description model references mc simulations on bcc lattice @xmath47 periodic boundary conditions empty lattice deposit particles from @xmath0 components at fugacity @xmath1 species update lattice checkerboard algorithm good vectorizationupdate lattice site @xmath48 on sublattices @xmath49 occupied by particle @xmath17 @xmath50 empty site randomly choose new trial particle @xmath51 value between @xmath52 and @xmath0 equal probability @xmath53 removal particle @xmath54 from lattice site successful if number @xmath55 between @xmath52 and @xmath56 smaller than inverse fugacity @xmath57 @xmath17 gets value @xmath52 remains unchanged @xmath58 deposition of particle @xmath51 @xmath50 successful if four nearest neighbor sites empty or occupied by particle same type @xmath51 @xmath59 @xmath17 gets value @xmath51 otherwise remains unchanged direct replacement particle @xmath60 eight empty sites successful simulation after equilibration @xmath61 update lattice @xmath62 times every tenth step for evaluation averages typical run with @xmath62 1 cpu hours @xmath63 occupancy site @xmath64 if @xmath48 empty @xmath65 otherwiseobservables took histograms @xmath66 @xmath67 crystal structure @xmath68 demixed phase subsystems @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 denotes number particles @xmath17 subsystem @xmath74 @xmath75 average density @xmath0 transition activity @xmath76 found finite size scaling techniques @xcite @xmath77 moments @xmath66 @xmath78 evaluated subsystems @xmath74 fourth order cumulant @xcite @xmath79 one phase region critical point subsystem size larger correlation length @xmath81 @xmath82 order parameter distribution gaussian centered @xmath52 @xmath83 @xmath84 two phase coexistence region critical point assume @xmath85 order parameter distribution bimodal @xmath86 @xmath84 near critical point @xmath87 cumulant function @xmath88 @xmath89 same value @xmath90 @xmath91 method allows efficient determination critical points analyzing cumulants different values @xmath1 different length scales model low values @xmath1 disordered one phase region @xmath92 for @xmath93 increasing @xmath1 large @xmath0 crystal phase @xmath94 @xmath95@xmath76 expect @xmath96 @xmath97 method locating transition fugacities used previous studies square lattice @xmath98 obtain values @xmath99 @xmath100 cumulants gas crystal transition hard diamond @xmath104component system shown figs . 1 2 transition points presented fig . 3 asymptotic expression @xmath105 corresponds value @xmath37 bcc lattice @xmath40 obtained mc techniques fig . 3 empirical fit @xmath106corrections @xmath76 @xmath107 mc data value @xmath108 minimum components crystal phase bcc lattice @xmath109 fig . 4 approach critical fugacity @xmath110 to limit hard diamond system @xmath6 direct transition from gas phase to demixed phase transition fugacity @xmath111 transition second order exponents cubic lattice @xmath112 direct first order transition from crystal to demixed phase transition analyzed order parameter distribution @xmath68 simulations hysteresis region around @xmath113 between values @xmath1 increasing decreasing fugacity small hysteresis region less than @xmath116 @xmath113 taken average region @xmath117larger hysteresis region located transition fugacity @xmath113 stability phases simulation configurations phases parallel simulation box phase transition values @xmath113 shown fig . 1 increasing components transition fugacities approach asymptotic line @xmath118 thank a. mazel discussions acknowledges support deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft heisenberg foundation computations at cray - ymp rhrk kaiserslautern cray - t90 hlrz jlich supported by nsf grant dmr 95 - 23266 dimacs nsf contract stc-91 - 19999 n.j . commission science technology
| 0.432841
| 2,841
| 1,513
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,301
|
the possible existence of @xmath0-nucleus bound states has been put forward through theoretical and experimental studies .
it is strongly related to the @xmath0 mass at finite density , which is expected to be reduced because of the interplay between the @xmath1 anomaly and partial restoration of chiral symmetry .
the investigation of the @xmath2 reaction at gsi and fair , as well as an overview of the experimental program at gsi and future plans at fair are discussed .
example.eps gsave newpath 20 20 moveto 20 220 lineto 220 220 lineto 220 20 lineto closepath 2 setlinewidth gsave .4 setgray fill grestore stroke grestore
|
it is theoretically argued that the heavy mass of the @xmath0 meson , which is around @xmath3 , originates from the interplay between the @xmath1 anomaly in quantum chromodynamics and the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry @xcite .
furthermore , when chiral symmetry is partially restored at finite density , the mass is expected to be reduced .
for example , @xmath4 mass reduction at the normal nuclear density is estimated in the nambu jona - lasinio model calculation @xcite , and a recent calculation using the linear sigma model predicts @xmath5 reduction @xcite . in the qmc ( quark - meson coupling )
model , a rather small mass reduction of @xmath6 is predicted for the case of an @xmath7-@xmath0 mixing angle of @xmath8 @xcite .
the mass reduction at finite density is , in other words , the outcome of an attractive interaction between an @xmath0 meson and a nucleus .
if the attraction is strong enough , an @xmath0-nucleus bound state may be formed .
for the experimental observation of such a bound state , the decay width is one of the important ingredients .
the chiral unitary model including a lagrangian term which couples the singlet meson to the baryons indicates that the real part of the optical potential is in general deeper than the imaginary part , while the coupling constant is an unknown parameter @xcite . from the experimental side ,
two kinds of measurements , @xmath0 photoproduction off nuclei @xcite and @xmath0 production in proton - proton collision @xcite , have been used to extract the information on @xmath0-nucleus interaction and @xmath0-nucleon interaction , respectively , by taking different approaches .
the cbelsa / taps experiment determined both the real part @xcite and the imaginary part @xcite of the @xmath0-nucleus optical potential . the imaginary part , which is half of the absorption width , was obtained to be @xmath9 through a measurement of the transparency ratios for different nuclear targets @xcite .
in addition , by comparing the excitation function and the momentum distribution of @xmath0 mesons for the photoproduction off carbon with corresponding theoretical calculations , the real part was derived as @xmath10 @xcite . through these studies
, they concluded a possible existence of @xmath0 mesic nuclei @xcite .
the near - threshold behavior of the cross section of the @xmath11 reaction supplies information on the @xmath0-nucleon interaction .
the cosy-11 experiment determined the @xmath0-proton scattering length in free space , as @xmath12 .
it indicates a shallow depth of the @xmath0-nucleus optical potential if one assumes no energy and density dependence @xcite .
the investigation of @xmath0 mesic nuclei will be an alternative way to extract direct information of the @xmath0-nucleus interaction .
we plan a series of missing - mass spectroscopy experiments with the @xmath13 reaction @xcite at gsi and fair . as the first step
, we performed an inclusive measurement at gsi .
moreover , a semi - exclusive measurement , with the coincidence of decay particles from @xmath0 mesic nuclei , will be studied in the future at fair .
@xmath0-mesic nuclei will be produced by impinging a @xmath14 proton beam onto a @xmath15-thick carbon target .
the incident energy is slightly above the @xmath0 production threshold in the @xmath16 reaction .
the missing - mass is obtained by analyzing the momentum of the ejectile deuterons with the fragment separator ( frs ) used as a high - resolution spectrometer .
the missing - mass resolution is estimated to be less than @xmath17 in @xmath18 , which is dominated by the uncertainty of the reaction vertex inside the target .
it would be sufficiently smaller than the decay width of @xmath0 mesic nuclei , and this feature is one of the advantages of our experiment .
figure [ missingmass ] shows a simulated spectrum corresponding to 4.5 days of data acquisition for different @xmath0-nucleus optical potentials parameterized as @xmath19 @xcite . in the simulation
, the cross section in the @xmath13 reaction is assumed to be the sum of a theoretical calculation @xcite , in which @xmath0 production is involved , and contributions of background processes of multi - pion production , evaluated from past measurements of proton - nucleon cross sections @xcite .
the experimental sensitivity of finding peak structures above a huge background will be large enough in case of a large @xmath20 and a small @xmath21 . while the signal - to - noise ratio will be of the order of 1/100 even in such a case
, a high - statistics measurement with an intense primary beam will compensate the poor signal - to - noise ratio . the first experiment ( gsi s-437 )
was carried out at gsi in august 2014 .
figure [ frs_setup ] shows the experimental setup at frs .
two sets of multi - wire drift chambers ( mwdc s ) were installed close to a dispersive focal plane at s4 , and the momentum of ejectile deuterons could be analyzed by measuring their tracks with them . for particle discrimination between deuterons and protons from inelastic scattering , we measured the time - of - flight between s2 and s4 by plastic scintillators labelled with sc2h , sc2v , sc41 , and sc42 .
in addition , we prepared erenkov detectors with high refractive - index ( @xmath22 ) silica aerogel radiators , which were developed at chiba university @xcite , ( hirac and mini - hirac ) and a total - reflection erenkov detector with an acrylite radiator ( torch ) .
it is worth emphasizing that we could make the main trigger for the @xmath13 reaction with a tight coincidence of the signals of the scintillators in s2 and s4 , and without an anticoincidence of these erenkov detectors .
this removes the influence of a possible position - dependence of the overkill rate of each erenkov detector on the missing - mass spectrum .
figure [ tof2h41 ] shows the tof distribution between s2 and s4 obtained by an unbiased trigger .
the two peaks are @xmath23 distant from each other , which is consistent with the tof difference between protons and deuterons within the momentum acceptance .
the deuteron - to - proton ratio is found to be approximately 1/200 .
later on , we could achieve a deuteron - to - proton ratio around unity by tuning the coincidence timing in order to remove the protons on the trigger level .
the remaining background , which is seen beneath the deuteron peak in fig .
[ tof2h41 ] , is due to sequential protons with a short ( @xmath23 ) time interval .
the waveforms of the scintillator signals will serve to distinguish one - pulse events from two - pulse events .
we have been working to improve the purity without losing the efficiency in particle identification .
we have taken data for the following reactions with changing the frs magnetic field to cover a wide range of excitation energies between @xmath24 and @xmath25 relative to the @xmath0 emission threshold .
* @xmath26 reaction at @xmath14 incident energy * @xmath27 reaction at @xmath14 incident energy ( for background study ) * @xmath28 reaction at @xmath29 incident energy ( for calibration ) the analysis of the mwdc s is in progress .
for example , the overall missing - mass resolution for the @xmath26 reaction has been estimated to be @xmath30 ( preliminary ) from the missing - mass resolution of the proton peak in the calibration process .
while we will proceed with an inclusive measurement with higher statistics in a future experiment , another way is to make a coincidence of the forward going deuteron with decay particles from the decay of @xmath0 mesic nuclei ( semi - exclusive measurement ) .
we aim to tag a proton from the two - nucleon absorption process ( @xmath31 ) , which is one of the major decay modes of @xmath0 mesic nuclei @xcite .
this proton has a kinetic energy around @xmath32 .
such a fast proton will be hardly emitted from the main background of multi - pion production processes , even if rescattering takes place , and the coincidence is expected to improve the signal - to - noise ratio significantly .
more quantitative evaluation of the proton distribution from the background processes as well as the decay of @xmath0 mesic nuclei , by an intra - nuclear cascade simulation using a microscopic transport model jam @xcite , is under way .
we plan to develop a proton counter to be installed surrounding the target , by which protons can be distinguished from charged pions .
this experimental setup will be possible at super - frs , which is to be built in the fair complex .
we are investigating @xmath0 mesic nuclei by means of missing - mass spectroscopy with the @xmath13 reaction .
an inclusive measurement of the @xmath13 reaction on @xmath33 at frs / gsi was carried out in august 2014 .
the expected resolution will be around @xmath17 , which is much smaller than the width of @xmath0 mesic nuclei .
the analysis is under way .
furthermore , we plan to perform a semi - exclusive measurement at super - frs / fair , with tagging decay protons from the two - nucleon absorption process in @xmath0 mesic nuclei
. the signal - to - noise ratio , which is of the order of 1/100 at most in the inclusive spectrum , will be improved significantly .
a detailed monte carlo simulation with a microscopic transport model jam is in progress .
the experiment was performed in the framework of the super - frs collaboration for fair .
this work is partly supported by a grant - in - aid for scientific research on innovative areas ( no .
24105705 ) from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science and technology(mext ) , japan , and a grant - in - aid for young scientists ( a ) ( no .
25707018 ) from japan society for the promotion of science ( jsps ) .
h. nagahiro , m. takizawa , and s. hirenzaki , phys .
c * 74 * , 045203 ( 2006 ) .
s. sakai and d. jido , phys .
c * 88 * , 064906 ( 2013 ) .
s.d . bass and a.w .
thomas , phys .
b * 634 * , 368 ( 2006 ) .
h. nagahiro , s. hirenzaki , e. oset , and a. ramos , phys . lett . *
b709 * , 87 ( 2012 ) .
v. metag , in these proceedings .
p. moskal , in these proceedings .
m. nanova _ et al .
b * 727 * , 417 ( 2013 ) .
m. nanova _ et al .
b * 710 * , 600 ( 2012 ) .
e. czerwiski _
et al . _ ,
* 113 * , 062004 ( 2014 ) .
k. itahashi et al . , letter of intent for gsi - sis ( 2011 ) ; k. itahashi , h. fujioka _ et al .
. phys . * 128 * , 601 ( 2012 ) .
h. nagahiro , d. jido , h. fujioka , k. itahashi , and s. hirenzaki , phys .
c * 87 * , 045201 ( 2013 ) .
h. nagahiro , in these proceedings .
m. tabata and h. kawai , arxiv:1410.2439 [ physics.ins-det ] y. nara , n. otuka , a. ohnishi , k. niita , and s. chiba , phys . rev .
c * 61 * , 024901 ( 2000 ) .
|
theoretically argued heavy mass @xmath0 meson around @xmath3 originates from interplay @xmath1 anomaly quantum chromodynamics breaking chiral symmetry @xcite chiral symmetry partially restored at finite density mass expected @xmath4 mass reduction at normal nuclear density estimated in nambu jona - lasinio model recent calculation linear sigma model predicts @xmath5 reduction @xcite qmc model small mass reduction of @xmath6 predicted @xmath7-@xmath0 mixing angle @xmath8 @xcite mass reduction at finite density outcome interaction between @xmath0 meson nucleus attraction strong @xmath0-nucleus bound state may formed experimental observation decay width important chiral unitary model lagrangian term singlet meson to baryons indicates real optical potential deeper than imaginary part coupling constant unknown measurements @xmath0 photoproduction off nuclei production in proton - proton collision used information-nucleus interaction approaches cbelsa / taps experiment determined real imaginary part @xmath0-nucleus optical potentialimaginary part half absorption width obtained @xmath9 transparency ratios nuclear targets excitation function momentum distribution @xmath0 mesons photoproduction real part derived @xmath10 concluded possible existence @xmath0 mesic nuclei near - threshold behavior @xmath11 reaction information @xmath0-nucleon interaction cosy-11 experiment determined @xmath0-proton scattering length free space @xmath12 indicates shallow depth @xmath0-nucleus optical potential no energy density dependence investigation @xmath0 mesic nuclei alternative information-nucleus interaction plan missing - mass spectroscopy experiments @xmath13 reaction at gsi fair performed inclusive measurement at gsi semi - exclusive measurement decay particles @xmath0 mesic nuclei studied fair @xmath0-mesic nuclei produced impinging @xmath14 proton beam @xmath15-thick carbon target incident energy slightly above @xmath0 production threshold @xmath16 reaction missing - mass obtained analyzing momentum ejectile deuterons missing - mass resolution less than @xmath17 in @xmath18 dominated uncertainty reaction vertex inside targetsmaller than decay width @xmath0 mesic nuclei experiment figure missingmass shows simulated spectrum 4.5 days data acquisition for @xmath0-nucleus optical potentials @xmath19 @xcite cross section in @xmath13 reaction sum of theoretical calculation background processes multi - pion production proton - nucleon experimental peak structures above background large large @xmath20 small @xmath21 signal - to - noise ratio 1/100 high - statistics measurement with intense primary beam poor signal - - noise ratio first experiment gsi s-437 at gsi august 2014 figure frs_setup experimental setup frs multi - wire drift chambers installed close to dispersive focal plane at s4 momentum of ejectile deuterons analyzed measuring tracks discrimination measured time - of - flight between s2 and s4 by plastic scintillators sc2h sc2v sc41 sc42 prepared erenkov detectors with high refractive - index @xmath22 ) silica aerogel radiators chiba university total - reflection erenkov detector with acrylite radiatormain trigger for @xmath13 reaction with coincidence signals scintillators in s2 s4 without anticoincidence erenkov detectors removes influence position - dependence overkill rate erenkov detector missing - mass spectrum figure shows tof distribution between s2 and s4 unbiased trigger two peaks @xmath23 distant consistent with tof difference between protons deuterons momentum acceptance deuteron - to - proton ratio approximately 1/200 achieve ratio unity by tuning coincidence timing remove protons on trigger level remaining background beneath deuteron peak due to sequential protons with short time interval waveforms scintillator signals distinguish one - pulse from two - pulse events working to improve purity without efficiency particle identification taken data for reactions with changing frs magnetic field excitation energies between @xmath24 and @xmath25 relative emission threshold @xmath26 reaction @xmath14 @xmath27 reaction @xmath28 analysis of mwdc s in progress missing - mass resolution for @xmath26 reaction estimated to be @xmath30 from proton peak calibrationproceed inclusive measurement higher statistics future experiment forward deuteron decay particles @xmath0 mesic nuclei semi - exclusive measurement aim tag proton two - nucleon absorption process @xmath31 major decay @xmath0 mesic nuclei proton kinetic energy around @xmath32 fast proton hardly emitted background multi - pion production processes coincidence signal - to - noise ratio quantitative evaluation proton distribution decay nuclei intra - nuclear cascade simulation microscopic transport model jam under way plan develop proton counter target protons charged pions experimental setup super - frs fair complex investigating @xmath0 mesic nuclei missing - mass spectroscopy @xmath13 reaction inclusive measurement @xmath13 reaction @xmath33 frs / gsi august 2014 expected resolution around @xmath17 smaller than width @xmath0 mesic nuclei analysis under way plan semi - exclusive measurement super - frs / fair tagging decay protons two - nucleon absorption process @xmath0 mesic nuclei signal - to - noise ratio 1/100 improved detailed monte carlo simulation microscopic transport model jam progressexperiment performed super - frs collaboration fair supported by grant scientific research 24105705 ministry education culture sports science technology japan grant young scientists 25707018 japan society promotion science h. nagahiro m. takizawa s. hirenzaki . 74 045203 ( 2006 ) s. sakai d. jido 88 064906 ( 2013 ) s.d bass a thomas . 634 368 ( 2006 ) h. nagahiro s. hirenzaki e. oset a. ramos phys . b709 87 ( 2012 ) v. metag p. moskal m. nanova al 727 * 417 ( 2013 ) 710 600 ( 2012 ). czerwiski 113 062004 ( 2014 ) k. itahashi letter intent gsi - sis 2011 ) h. fujioka phys . 128 * 601 ( 2012 ) h. nagahiro d. jido fujioka itahashi s. hirenzaki phys . 87 045201 ( 2013 ) h. nagahiro m. tabata h. kawai arxiv:1410.2439 physics.ins-det nara otuka ohnishi niita chiba phys . rev. * 61 024901 2000 )
| 0.432579
| 2,693
| 1,372
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,311
|
we motivate the study of `` minijets '' ( that is jets soft with respect to the hard scattering , but hard with respect to @xmath0 ) as a means to study the underlying qcd colour flow in events .
we discuss , with the aid of a simplistic model , currently available events in which minijets are observed , that is the events have high multiplicity , as a means of understanding the physics of minijets .
we encourage both theoreticians and experiments to continue the study of minijets
. = -2 cm = -1.5 cm = 23.0truecm = 16.5truecm cern
th/97182 1.cm * minijets as a perturbative probe of colour charge * 1.3 cm david j. summers .2 cm th division , cern , ch-1211 genve 23 , suisse contribution to 32nd rencontres de moriond : qcd and hadronic interactions cern
th/97182 in the past
the concept of qcd colour flow has been an interesting prediction , and hence test , of qcd .
one of the more surprising examples of qcd colour flow has been the rapidity gaps seen at hera @xcite . in the majority of jet events
observed at hera the incoming electron / positron radiates a photon , which scatters off one of the coloured constituents of the proton , to produce the observed jet .
this hard scattering leaves the proton remnant and the pre - jet in a non colour singlet state , during hadronization the colour of these objects is rearranged to form colourless hadrons , and these hadrons fill the gap between the produced jet and the proton remnant with an underlying event .
however among the hera events are some with an observed jet produced at central rapidities ; but with no hadrons between the jet and proton remnant direction ; _ i.e. _ there is no underlying event , and this means that the mechanism for producing this jet can not be that just described .
the lack of hadrons between the observed jet and the proton remnant means that there is no qcd colour is exchanged between the proton and the photon , and hence that photon must have scattered off a colour singlet object in the proton , the pomeron .
so the flow of hadrons in an event has told us something about the structure of the proton , that the struck object inside the proton that took part in the hard scattering is a qcd colour singlet . this ability to probe
the qcd colour of the object that takes part in the hard scattering is , in the future , likely to provide a strong experimental probe .
a prime example is in the detection of a heavy ( @xmath1 gev ) higgs boson at the lhc , such a higgs is produced via two different mechanisms .
approximately two thirds of heavy higgs are produced from @xmath2 fusion via a top quark loop , with the remaining third produced via vector boson fusion , show in fig.[fig : wwh]a .
such a heavy higgs typically decays into two massive vector bosons , either @xmath3 or @xmath4 bosons , and the back ground from continuum diboson production , shown in fig.[fig : wwh]b , can be large .
however the qcd colour flow in the diboson fusion signal process is very different from the background continuum diboson production , the leading colour flow is shown in fig.[fig : wwh ] as a dotted line . for the diboson fusion process
qcd colour flows between the proton remnant and the parton that emits the vector boson , this parton travels in very much the same direction as the proton remnant .
this means that the hadrons associated with the underlying event will travel in a similar direction to the proton remnant , i.e. at very large rapidities . for the diboson continuum background ( as well as the higgs signal from @xmath2 fusion ) qcd colour
is exchanged between the two protons , and this means that the underlying event will produce hadrons at all rapidities .
this difference in the flow of hadrons gives us a method of separating the vector boson fusion higgs signal from the continuum background , effectively the higgs signal has a double rapidity gap on both sides of the event , with the higgs decay taking place at central rapidities @xcite .
however this method for separating signal from background by the flow of hadrons has many difficulties . on the theoretical side
we make predictions and the rate of the signal and background based upon perturbative qcd ( pqcd ) .
pqcd s fundamental fields are partons ( quarks and gluons ) and it is about these fields that pqcd makes predictions . by local parton hadron duality we expect that the produced partons will hadronize into jets ; however this tells us nothing about individual hadrons and it is in terms of individual hadrons that rapidity gaps are defined .
this means that we can make no absolute predictions based upon pqcd of the signal rate of events where a rapidity gap is observed , or indeed the background rate where a fluctuation leads to an observed rapidity gap , despite qcd colour being exchanged between the protons . on the experimental side the cross section for higgs productions drops very rapidly as the higgs gets heavy , and for very heavy higgs the cross section is small enough that it is only with very high luminosities that we produce any higgs events at all .
however at very high luminosities there are likely to be many interactions per bunch crossing , and each of these interactions will produce its own underlying event , which will wash out the rapidity gap at central rapidities .
one possible solution to these problems is rather that look for events with a rapidity gap , _
i.e. _ no hadrons at central rapidities , instead to look for events with no soft `` minijets '' at central rapidities @xcite .
naively we expect additional jets to be suppressed by a factor of @xmath5 , however there can often be a large volume of phase space in which additional jets can be radiated , and this can enhance the additional jet rate by a large logarithm such that multijet emission is not suppressed . in particular jet emission that is soft with respect to the hard scattering
is enhanced by such a large logarithm . if we define soft jets in such a way that the background divector boson continuum ( which has more qcd colour acceleration , and hence more jet activity ) typically has additional jet emission , while the vector boson fusion signal ( with less qcd colour accelerated ) typically has no additional jet activity ; then the difficulties with using hadrons to define a rapidity gap are overcome . additional soft jet production
we expect to be predictable by pqcd as long as the scale for soft jet emission is far above @xmath0 . on the experimental side
we expect that the majority of interactions will be very soft , and although producing an underlying event the majority of interactions will not produce observed jets , and so not interfere with tagging a higgs signal event .
this means that firm theoretical predictions can , in principle , be made about a minijet tag of a higgs signal , and that a minijet tag can be used at high luminosities where there are overlapping events . however before we can use minijet emission as a probe of qcd colour charge it is necessary to understand minijet emission both on a theoretical and experimental level . in order for multiple jet emission to be important
we need a large phase space for emission of those jets , and this means that we require the hard scattering to be as energetic as possible .
currently the most energetic events are to be found at the tevatron , and cdf have studied the multijet distributions in there most energetic events @xcite .
they apply the cuts , @xmath6 where @xmath7 is the scattering angle of the highest @xmath8 jet in the multijet centre of mass frame . due to the high invariant mass of these events
the events are forced to be fairly central , and this means that at least two jets are always observed . in figure
[ fig : mult ] we show the multiplicity distribution observed in the cdf events , although 3rd and additional jets are naively produced at a higher order in perturbation theory because of the large volume of phase space such additional jet activity is not suppressed , with typical events with 3 or 4 jets observed .
the high multiplicity of these events means that pqcd in its lowest order is not not reliable .
the large logs that give rise to the high multiplicity need to be dealt with in the theoretical calculation .
now most of the additional jet activity takes place at low @xmath8 , and these soft jets typically originate from gluons .
now for soft gluons the matrix element factorises , the probability to radiate @xmath9 additional soft gluons is given by , @xmath10 the phase space to radiate @xmath9 additional gluons is given by , @xmath11 where the @xmath12 term arises from the symmetry factor for integrating @xmath9 gluons over the same phase space .
now if @xmath13 , that is we make no experimental requirements about the observed properties of the gluons , then in moment space we find , @xmath14 this means that the probability to see @xmath9 gluon jets is given by , @xmath15 and so , @xmath16 however for the case of jets defined by the cdf algorithm @xmath17 , also not all jets are soft , and not all jets are gluon initiated .
this means that this simple factorisation of the additional jet rate does not hold , however it is a reasonable ansatz to assume equation [ eq : atz ] .
this is not the full story though , equation [ eq : atz ] does not conserve probability , this happens because the rate to radiate an addition gluon @xmath18 is an inclusive quantity , whereas if we are to make predictions about the specific multiplicity distributions then we require the exclusive rate to produce _ exactly _ @xmath9 additional jets .
we can obtain the exclusive jet rate by adding a sudakov suppression factor @xmath19 @xcite that excludes all additional jet activity , and then equation [ eq : atz ] produces exactly @xmath9 exclusive jets .
this gives the ansatz for additional jet activity over the hard scattering as , @xmath20 where @xmath21 is the average multiplicity @xmath22 , and at the leading logarithmic level is given by , @xmath23 this formula has the advantage over strictly tree level pqcd of being still valid even when @xmath24 .
also we have , @xmath25 and so the 3 jet cross section has the same accuracy as at leading order . if we compare equation [ eq : satz ] with the measured cdf multiplicity distribution , fitting only @xmath26 to the observed average excess multiplicity over the 2 hard jets always observed we find the curve shown in figure [ fig : mult ] .
although the point for multiplicity 4 is 3.5 standard deviations above the fitted curve , and thus the equation [ eq : satz ] has limitations , it is clear that the fit has got the gist of the multiplicity distribution correct and gives a place to start when studying event multiplicities , and hence the physics of minijets .
if we now try to predict the value for @xmath26 from pqcd using equation [ eq : pfit ] with a tree level calculation for @xmath27 and a next - to - leading - order calculation for @xmath28 @xcite then we find the results shown in figure [ fig : nbar ] plotted against the minimum @xmath8 used to define a jet @xcite . for the leading order calculation of @xmath27
we have several different choices of scale .
for the renormalisation scale of @xmath5 ; this can either be some multiple of the hard scattering scale , @xmath29 , or some multiple of the soft scale at which the jet is emitted @xmath30 .
for the factorisation scale at which the parton densities are evaluated we similarly can choose a hard scale related to @xmath29 , if we feel we should sum up the initial state radiation , or a soft scale related to @xmath30 if we feel that explicitly calculating high order emission in @xmath27 means that we should only generate higher order corrections bellow that scale .
a case can be made for each of these choices , and from figure [ fig : nbar ] we can see the prediction for @xmath22 changes by a factor of 3 for the experimental value of @xmath31 .
this happens because we have two natural scales in the calculation of @xmath27 the hard scattering scale , and the @xmath8 of the emisson , and as these have very different values the predictions for @xmath22 vary accordingly .
the theoretical predictions for @xmath22 span the experimental measurement , but we can not make an accurate theoretical predition at this time . without improvements to the theoretical predictions
we do not currently have the ability to accurately predict the rate of minijet emission , and this means that we do not currently have the technology to use minijets as a absolute theoretical prediction to probe qcd colour charge . on the theoretical side
the large scale dependence of @xmath27 can be cured by working at higher order in perturbation theory @xcite ; however this would necessitate an improvement in the simple minijet model , equation [ eq : satz ] , which is non consistent we such a higher order calculation .
alternatively it may be possible to show which logarithmic terms need to be resummed in order to remove the large scale dependence , without a full calculation of the higher order finite corrections .
in addition equation [ eq : satz ] does not take advantage of our knowledge of the tree level rate for high jet multiplicities @xcite .
clearly there is much theoretical work that remains to be done .
there is also much work to be done on the experimental side to help our understanding of minijets , for example the different theoretical scale choices not only affect the average multiplicity , but also affect the shape of distributions .
this can be seen in figure [ fig : nbar ] where a renormalisation scale related to the @xmath8 of the emitted jet has the average multiplicity growing far more rapidly as the @xmath8 cut used to define a jet is decreased , than a harder renormalisation scale . if the experimenter were able to measure this distribution then this information can be used to motivate different choices for the scale choice .
|
i would like to thank dieter zeppenfeld and david rainwater for their fruitful collaboration on this project .
|
thank dieter zeppenfeld david rainwater collaboration project
| 0.065405
| 23
| 12
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,320
|
dose calculation for radiotherapy with protons and heavier ions deals with a large volume of path integrals involving a scattering power of body tissue .
this work provides a simple model for such demanding applications .
there is an approximate linearity between rms end - point displacement and range of incident particles in water , empirically found in measurements and detailed calculations .
this fact was translated into a simple linear formula , from which the scattering power that is only inversely proportional to residual range was derived .
the simplicity enabled analytical formulation for ions stopping in water , which was designed to be equivalent with the extended highland model and agreed with measurements within 2% or 0.02 cm in rms displacement .
the simplicity will also improve the efficiency of numerical path integrals in the presence of heterogeneity .
|
the essence of radiotherapy with protons and heavier ions lies in precise control of incident particles that are designed to stop in tumor volume .
the targeting precision will be inevitably deteriorated by multiple scattering in beam modifiers and patient body and such effects must be accurately handled for dose calculations in treatment planning .
on the other hand , simplicity and efficiency are also essential in clinical practice and there has always been need for a computational method that balances all these demanding and conflicting requirements .
fermi and then eyges ( 1948 ) developed a general theory for charged particles that undergo energy loss and multiple scattering in matter .
a group of particles is approximated as a gaussian beam growing in space with statistical variances @xmath0 where @xmath1 is the longitudinal position and @xmath2 and @xmath3 are the projected particle position and angle .
the original fermi - eyges theory adopted purely gaussian approximation ( rossi and greisen 1948 ) with ( projected ) scattering power @xmath4 where @xmath5 mev is a constant , @xmath6 is the radiation length of the material , and @xmath7 , @xmath8 , and @xmath9 are the charge , the momentum , and the velocity of the particles .
the fermi
rossi formula totally ignores effects of large - angle single scattering ( hanson 1951 ) and was found to be inaccurate ( wong 1990 ) . based on formulations by highland ( 1975 , 1979 ) and gottschalk ( 1993 ) , kanematsu ( 2008b )
proposed a scattering power with correction for the single - scattering effect , although within the gaussian approximation , @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the radiative path length .
although it would be difficult to calculate integrals
because of the embedded integral in the @xmath12 terms , kanematsu ( 2008b ) further derived an approximate formula for the rms displacement of incident ions at the end point in homogeneous matter as @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the ion mass in units of the proton mass , @xmath15 is the expected in - water range on the incidence , @xmath16 is the stopping - power ratio of the matter relative to water , and @xmath17 and @xmath18 are constants . despite the complex involvement of variable @xmath15 in , kanematsu ( 2008b ) found the @xmath19@xmath15 relation for ions in water to be very linear .
in fact , preston and kohler of harvard cyclotron laboratory knew the linear relation and derived universal curve @xmath20 with @xmath21 for relative growth of rms displacement @xmath22 in homogeneous matter in an unpublished work in 1968 .
starting with the empirical linear relation , this work is aimed to develop a simple and general multiple - scattering model to improve efficiency of numerical heterogeneity handling and to enable further analytical beam modeling .
linear approximation @xmath23 for homogeneous systems greatly simplifies to @xmath24 where @xmath25 cm is the radiation length of water , @xmath26 is the scattering / stopping ratio of the material relative to water , and @xmath27 is the geometrical range .
was calibrated to for water at @xmath28 .
equation @xmath29 at the end point @xmath30 associates and as @xmath31 to lead to another scattering power @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the particle - type - dependent factor .
the scattering power is inherently applicable to any heterogeneous system by numerical integral of .
we examined these fermi - rossi , extended highland , and linear - displacement models with unpublished measurements by phillips ( hollmark 2004 ) , those by preston and kohler ( kanematsu 2008b ) , and molire - hanson calculations by deasy ( 1998 ) .
we took growths of rms displacement @xmath34 with depth @xmath1 for @xmath35 cm protons , @xmath35 cm helium ions , and @xmath36 cm carbon ions in water and rms end - point displacements @xmath37 for them with varied incident range @xmath15 .
for a point mono - directional ion beam with in - water range @xmath15 incident into homogeneous matter with constant @xmath16 and @xmath6 , equations are analytically integrated to @xmath38 as a function of residual range @xmath39 at distance @xmath1 .
in fact reduces to the universal curve by preston and kohler .
a radiation field at a given @xmath1 position can be effectively or virtually modeled with a source , ignoring the matter ( icru-35 1984 ) .
the effective extended source is at @xmath40 , where @xmath41 would be minimum in vacuum .
the virtual point source is at @xmath42 , from which radiating particles would form a field of equivalent divergence .
similarly , the effective scattering point is at @xmath43^{1/2}$ ] , at which a point - like scattering would cause equivalent rms angle and displacement ( gottschalk 1993 ) .
with depth @xmath1 and ( b ) rms end - point displacement @xmath19 with incident range @xmath15 for protons , helium ions , and carbon ions in water , calculated with the fermi - rossi ( dashed ) , extended highland ( solid ) , linear - displacement ( dotted overlapping with the solid ) models along with a molire - hanson calculation by deasy ( @xmath44 ) and measurements by phillips ( @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 ) and by preston and kohler ( @xmath48 ) .
( c ) end - point lateral shape of a proton pencil beam in water ( @xmath49 cm ) measured by preston and kohler ( @xmath48 ) and estimated by fermi - rossi ( dashed ) and the present ( solid ) formulations . ]
\(a ) shows rms - displacement growths @xmath34 and ( b ) shows rms end - point displacements @xmath37 .
the present model was virtually identical to the extended highland model with deviations from measurements or molire - hanson calculations within either 2% or 0.02 cm , while the fermi - rossi model overestimated the rms displacements by nearly 10% .
( c ) shows an end - point shape of a pencil beam measured by preston and kohler for @xmath49 cm protons in water and curves estimated by fermi - rossi and the present formulations with additional @xmath50 to @xmath51 for incident beam emittance in their experiment .
the gaussian approximation was in fact adequate in this case .
\(a ) shows analytical variances @xmath52 , @xmath53 , and @xmath41 growing with depth @xmath1 for protons in water .
( b ) shows the relative distances from current position @xmath1 to the effective extended source @xmath54 , the virtual point source @xmath55 , and the effective scattering point @xmath56 .
they approach @xmath57 , @xmath58 , and @xmath59 at the @xmath60 limit .
increase of the scattering power with depth moves these points relatively closer to the current position .
in application of bragg peaks , the end - point displacement is the most important , for which the gaussian approximation was valid in the proton experiment by preston and kohler .
in fact , the single - scattering effect is theoretically small for a thick target ( hanson 1951 ) .
although ions suffer nuclear interactions with resultant fragments that generally scatter at large angles ( matsufuji 2005 ) , their contributions may be relatively less significant at the bragg peaks .
the present formulation would be thus adequate for radiotherapy . the linear - displacement model with the fermi - eyges theory has brought general formulas for ions , including the universal curve intuitively derived by preston and kohler without explicit formulation of the scattering power .
in the present model , the kinematic properties are encapsulated in residual range @xmath61 that is always tracked in beam transport . the ion - type dependence in scattering angle and displacement is simply as proportional to @xmath62 , which leads to 50% for @xmath63he , 28% for @xmath64c , and 24% for @xmath65o with respect to that of protons for a given incident range .
these numbers coincide with detailed numerical calculations by hollmark ( 2004 ) .
the linearity between end - point displacement and range observed for water is the basis of the present model .
its validity for general body - tissue materials is not obvious .
we here examine water and two extreme elements hydrogen ( @xmath66 cm ) and calcium ( @xmath67 cm ) among major elements of body tissues ( icru-46 1992 ) , using in the extended highland model .
shows their @xmath15@xmath19 relations with geometrical scale correction and indicates that the linearity will generally hold for body - tissue elements .
however , the elemental linearity may not truly warrant the validity for systems heterogeneous in atomic compositions .
the scattering power only depends on the residual range that is irrelevant to the multiple scattering accumulated in the other upstream materials , whereas the accumulation should influence the single - scattering effect ( kanematsu 2008b ) . in other words ,
the present model implicitly assumes heterogeneity in density only . in the current practice of treatment planning
, the patient heterogeneity is normally modeled with variable - density water ( kanematsu 2003 ) , for which the present model is rigorous with further simplified scattering power @xmath68 the simplicity will minimize computation of the integrands in path integrals for demanding dose calculations ( kanematsu 1998 , 2006 , 2008a ) .
a novel multiple - scattering model has been formulated based on the fact such that the rms end - point displacement is proportional to the incident range in water .
the model was designed to be equivalent with the extended highland model for stopping ions in water and agreed with measurements within 2% or 0.02 cm in rms displacement .
the resultant scattering - power formula that is only inversely proportional to residual range is much simpler than former formulations and can be used in the framework of the fermi - eyges theory for gaussian - beam transport in tissue - like matter .
the simplicity enables analytical beam modeling for homogeneous systems and improves efficiency of numerical path integrals for heterogeneous systems .
the present model is ideal for demanding dose calculations in treatment planning of heavy - charged - particle radiotherapy .
hollmark m , uhrdin j , d b , gudowska i and brahme a 2004 influence of multiple scattering and energy loss straggling on the absorbed dose distributions of therapeutic light ion beams : i. analytical pencil beam model 324765 kanematsu n , akagi t , futami y , higashi a , kanai t , matsufuji n , tomura h and yamashita h 1998 a proton dose calculation code for treatment planning based on the pencil beam algorithm _ jpn
phys . _ * 18 * 88103 matsufuji n , komori m , sasaki h , akiu k , ogawa m , fukumura a , urakabe e , inaniwa t , nishio t , kohno t and kanai t 2005 spatial fragment distribution from a therapeutic pencil - like carbon beam in water 3393403
|
radiotherapy with protons heavier ions in control of incident particles tumor volume targeting precision deteriorated by multiple scattering beam modifiers patient body effects for dose calculations simplicity efficiency essential in clinical practice need for computational method requirements fermi eyges 1948 developed theory for charged particles energy loss multiple scattering group particles approximated as gaussian beam space with statistical variances @xmath0 @xmath1 longitudinal position projected particle position angle original fermi - eyges theory adopted gaussian approximation 1948 with projected scattering power @xmath4 @xmath5 mev constant radiation length charge momentum velocity of particles fermi rossi formula ignores effects large - angle single scattering found inaccurate 1990 formulations highland 1975 1979 gottschalk 1993 kanematsu ( 2008b ) proposed scattering power with correction for single - scattering effect gaussian approximation @xmath10 is radiative path lengthdifficult calculate integrals @xmath12 terms kanematsu 2008b derived formula for rms displacement incident ions end point homogeneous matter @xmath13 @xmath14 ion mass proton mass expected in - water range stopping - power ratio water @xmath18 constants complex variable @xmath15 kanematsu found @xmath19@xmath15 relation for ions water linear preston kohler harvard relation derived universal curve @xmath20 @xmath21 for relative growth rms displacement @xmath22 homogeneous matter work 1968 aimed multiple - scattering model numerical heterogeneity handling analytical beam modeling linear approximation @xmath23 homogeneous systems simplifies @xmath24 @xmath25 cm radiation length water @xmath26 scattering / stopping ratio material water geometrical range calibrated water @xmath28 equation @xmath29 end point @xmath30 associates @xmath31 scattering power @xmath32 @xmath33 particle - type - dependent factor scattering power applicable heterogeneous system numerical integral examined fermi - rossi extended highland linear - displacement models measurements phillips preston kohler molire - hanson calculations deasy 1998 growths rms displacement @xmath34 depth @xmath1 protons helium carbon ions water rms end - point displacements @xmath37 varied incident range @xmath15 mono - directional ion beam in - water range homogeneous matter constant @xmath16 @xmath6 equations integrated @xmath38 residual range @xmath39 distance @xmath1 universal curve preston kohler radiation field @xmath1 position modeled source ignoring matter 1984 effective extended source @xmath40 @xmath41 minimum vacuum virtual point source @xmath42 radiating particles form field equivalent divergence effective scattering point @xmath43^ scattering equivalent rms angle displacement gottschalk 1993depth @xmath1 rms end - point displacement @xmath19 incident range @xmath15 protons helium carbon ions water calculated fermi - rossi extended highland linear - displacement models molire - hanson calculation measurements phillips preston kohler end - point shape proton pencil beam water @xmath49 cm measured preston kohler estimated fermi - rossi present formulations rms - displacement growths @xmath34 rms end - point displacements @xmath37 present model identical extended highland model deviations measurements calculations 2% 0.02 cm fermi - rossi model overestimated rms displacements 10% end - point shape pencil beam preston kohler @xmath49 cm protons water curves estimated fermi - rossi present formulations additional @xmath50 @xmath51 incident beam emittance gaussian approximation adequate analytical variances @xmath52 @xmath41 depth @xmath1 protons water relative distances current position @xmath1 effective extended source @xmath54 virtual point source @xmath55 scattering point @xmath56approach @xmath57 at @xmath60 limit scattering power depth moves points closer to current position bragg peaks end - point displacement important gaussian approximation valid in proton experiment preston kohler single - scattering effect small for thick target hanson 1951 ions suffer nuclear interactions large angles 2005 less significant at bragg peaks present formulation adequate for radiotherapy linear - displacement model fermi - eyges theory general formulas for ions universal curve preston kohler without formulation scattering power kinematic properties in residual range @xmath61 tracked in beam transport ion - type dependence in scattering angle displacement proportional to @xmath62 50% for @xmath63he 28% @xmath64c 24% for @xmath65o protons range coincide with calculations hollmark 2004 linearity between end - point displacement range for water basis present model validity for body - tissue materials not obvious examine water hydrogen calcium major elements body tissues 1992 highland model relations geometrical scale correction linearity for body - tissue elementselemental linearity warrant validity for systems heterogeneous atomic scattering power depends on residual range irrelevant to multiple scattering upstream materials accumulation single - scattering effect present model assumes heterogeneity in density patient heterogeneity modeled with variable - density water present model rigorous with simplified scattering power simplicity computation for dose calculations novel multiple - scattering model rms end - point displacement proportional to incident range water equivalent with extended highland model for stopping ions water agreed with measurements within 2% or 0.02 cm rms displacement scattering - power formula inversely proportional to residual range simpler than used fermi - eyges theory for gaussian - beam transport tissue simplicity enables beam modeling for homogeneous improves efficiency of numerical path integrals for heterogeneous systems model ideal for dose calculations heavy - charged - particle radiotherapy influence multiple scattering energy loss on absorbed dose distributions of therapeutic light ion beamspencil beam model kanematsu akagi futami higashi kanai matsufuji tomura yamashita 1998 proton dose calculation treatment planning pencil beam algorithm 88103 matsufuji komori sasaki akiu ogawa fukumura urakabe inaniwa nishio kohno kanai 2005 spatial fragment distribution therapeutic pencil carbon beam water
| 0.428299
| 2,470
| 1,238
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,323
|
quark - quark double scattering in ea dis and its contribution to quark and anti - quark fragmentation functions are investigated with the generalized factorization of the relevant twist - four processes in pqcd .
it is shown that the resulting modifications to quark and anti - quark fragmentation functions are different .
while the numerical size of these effects can not be determined from pqcd , the structure of our result leads to a number of qualitative predictions for the relative size of the effect for different hadrons .
these qualitative predictions agree with the multiplicity ratios for positive and negative hadrons as observed by hermes . , and multiple scattering in a nuclear medium is a key process to understand how hard processes are modified in nuclei .
detailed experimental information , which is available for such diverse reactions as electron - nucleus collisions ( @xmath0 ) in fixed target kinematics and hadron - nucleus collisions ( @xmath1 ) and nucleus - nucleus collisions ( @xmath2 ) at rhic or lhc is confronted by highly advanced theoretical descriptions @xcite .
still , however , a truly comprehensive and reliable description of all phenomena has not been reached . in this contribution
we discuss one element which should be contained in such an ultimate theoretical description .
we analyse @xcite quark - quark double scattering in nuclei and consider the nuclear effects on the quark and anti - quark fragmentation functions ( ff ) , using the generalized factorization theory by lqs @xcite in perturbative qcd .
we find that quark - quark double scattering will give different corrections to quark and anti - quark ff , and obtain qualitative predictions which are in agreement with quite remarkable observation by the hermes collaboration @xcite . in general
, there are two different kinds of double scattering with nuclear enhancement in ea dis : quark - gluon double scattering and quark - quark double scattering .
quark - gluon double scattering gives the dominant contribution to the leading quark energy loss and has been studied in detailed @xcite , while quark - quark double scattering may mixes quark and gluon fragmentation functions and therefore gives rise to new nuclear effects , as pointed out by wang and guo @xcite .
this is illustrated in fig .
[ fig:4q - ex](a ) . for the central - cut diagram ,
the final parton is a gluon fragmenting into the hadron considered .
for the left - cut or right - cut diagrams , however , the final fragmenting parton is a quark .
therefore , adding up the contributions of these three cut diagrams we will get a mixture of quark and gluon fragmentation functions .
moreover , we can see from the central cut of diagram ( a ) that the quark jet is converted into a gluon jet by annihilation with an anti - quark in the nucleus , which provides a mechanism to change the jet flavor @xcite .
for quark - quark double scattering , there are three cut diagrams in leading - order as shown in fig .
[ fig:4q - ex](a ) , and 46 cut diagrams in next - to - leading order , see fig .
[ fig:4q - ex](b ) @xcite . by summing all these contributions and including virtual corrections we can rewrite the semi - inclusive tensor in terms of a modified fragmentation function taking into account quark - quark double scattering : @xmath3 where @xmath4 is the partonic part for single scattering , @xmath5 are the leading - twist quark fragmentation functions in the vacuum , and the @xmath6
are related to the twist - four parton correlation operators @xcite and could be approximated as : @xmath7 c\ , f_{\bar q}^n(x_t ) \nonumber \\ & & + \int_0^{\mu^2 } \frac{d\ell_t^2}{\ell_t^2 } \frac{\alpha_s^2 x_b}{x_a q^2 } \int_{z_h}^1 \frac{dz}{z } d_{q \to h}(\frac{z_h}{z } ) \frac{1+z^2}{(1-z)^2_+ } \nonumber \frac{c_f}{n_c } [ 1-e^{-x_l^2/x_a^2 } ] c\ , f_{\bar q}^n(x_t ) \nonumber \\ & & -\int_0^{\mu^2 } \frac{d\ell_t^2}{\ell_t^2 } \frac{\alpha_s^2 x_b}{x_a q^2 } \int_{0}^1 dz d_{q \to
h}(z_h ) \frac{1+z^2}{(1-z)^2 } \nonumber \frac{c_f}{n_c } [ 1-e^{-x_l^2/x_a^2 } ] c\ , f_{\bar q}^n(x_t)\ , . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath8 , @xmath9 is the quark distribution inside a nucleus , @xmath10 is the anti - quark distribution inside a nucleon and @xmath11 is assumed to be a constant , @xmath12 and @xmath13 is the typical transverse momentum carried by the antiquark . if we consider the modification to an anti - quark ff all the calculations are the same with @xmath14 . therefore , we have @xmath15 .
hermes @xcite has measured the multiplicity ratio @xmath16 , which represents the ratio of the number of hadrons of type @xmath17 produced per dis event for a nuclear target of mass a to that from a deuterium target ( d ) : @xmath18 with @xmath19 the number of semi - inclusive hadrons in a given ( @xmath20)-bin , and @xmath21 the number of inclusive dis positrons in the same @xmath22-bin . in the constituent quark model , we have @xmath23 , @xmath24 . because the gluon ff for a positive hadron and its antiparticle are the same , and as we are interested only in the difference between the multiplicities of positive hadrons and negative hadrons
, we neglect the contributions from gluon ff and simply assume : @xmath25 where @xmath26 is a constituent quark of hadron @xmath17 , and @xmath27 is the number of these constituent quarks .
therefore we obtain @xmath28 \ , \ , , \label{eq : drm - pion } \\ & & \delta r_m^{p } \approx \delta\widetilde{d}_{q\to h}(z,\nu ) \propto f_{\bar q}^n(x_t ) \,\
, , \delta r_m^{\bar p } \approx \delta\widetilde{d}_{\bar q\to h}(z,\nu ) \propto f _ { q}^n(x_t ) \,\
, , \label{drm - proton } \\ & & \delta r_m^{\pi^+}(z,\nu ) \simeq \delta r_m^{\pi^- } \simeq \delta r_m^{\pi^0 } \,\ , , \label{eq : pion - order } \\ & & \delta r_m^{\bar p}(z,\nu ) > \delta
r_m^{p}(z,\nu ) \,\ , .
\label{eq : proton - order}\end{aligned}\ ] ] similarly we get @xmath29 the qualitative statements of eq .
( [ eq : pion - order ] ) , ( [ eq : proton - order ] ) , and ( [ eq : hadron - order ] ) agree with the observations made by the hermes collaboration @xcite .
|
the authors thank jian - wei qiu and enke wang for helpful discussion . this work was supported by alexander von humboldt foundation , by bmbf , by nsfc under project no .
10405011 , by moe of china with project no .
cfkstip-704035 , the u.s .
department of energy under contract no .
de - ac02 - 05ch11231 , and by the us nsf under grant no .
phy-0457265 , the welch foundation under grant no .
a-1358 .
m. gyulassy , i. vitev , x. n. wang and b. w. zhang , _ quark - gluon plasma 3 _ , r. c. hwa and x .-
n wang , eds . ( world scientific , singapore , 2003 ) .
j. w. qiu and g. sterman , int .
j. mod .
e * 12 * ( 2003 ) 149 .
x. f. guo and x .-
wang , phys .
lett . * 85 * , 3591 ( 2000 ) ; x .- n . wang and x. f. guo , nucl .
a * 696 * , 788 ( 2001 ) . b. w. zhang and x .-
wang , nucl .
a * 720 * , 429 ( 2003 ) ; b. w. zhang , e. wang and x. n. wang , phys .
lett . * 93 * , 072301 ( 2004 ) ; nucl .
phys . a * 757 * , 493 ( 2005 ) ; b. w. zhang , [ arxiv : nucl - th/0411076 ] .
|
authors thank jian - wei qiu enke wang discussion work supported alexander von humboldt foundation bmbf nsfc project 10405011 moe china u.s department energy - ac02 - 05ch11231 us nsf grant phy-0457265 welch foundation grant a-1358. gyulassy vitev x. n. wang b. w. zhang quark - gluon plasma 3 r c. hwa x .- n wang world scientific singapore 2003 ) j. w. qiu g. sterman int .. mod. 12 * 2003 ) 149 x. f. guo x wang phys . 85 3591 ( 2000 ) 696 788 ( 2001 ) w zhang x - wang 720 429 ( 2003 ) wang wang phys 93 072301 ( 2004 ) 757 493 ( 2005 ) zhang nucl - th/0411076
| 0.072771
| 420
| 206
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,339
|
the vibrational spectrum of 60 is compared to the spectrum of a classical isotropic elastic spherical shell .
we show correlations between the low frequency modes of 60 and those of the spherical shell .
we find the spherical model gives the approximate frequency ordering for the low frequency modes .
we estimate a poisson ratio of @xmath0 and a transverse speed of sound of @xmath1 m / s for the equivalent elastic shell .
we also find that @xmath2 for the shell modes @xmath3 and @xmath4 , independent of elastic constants .
we find that this ratio compares favorably with an experimental value of @xmath5 .
|
the superconductivity of 60-derived solids owes its origin in part to features of the vibrational spectrum of 60 .
consequently , a microscopic understanding of superconductivity requires an understanding of the vibrational modes .
while there have previously been detailed computational studies @xcite yielding vibrational frequencies in excellent agreement with experiment , additional insight into the nature of modes can be obtained by comparing the vibrational spectrum of quasi - spherical 60 with that of its continuum analog : a thin , elastic , spherical shell .
the electronic structure of 60 has been previously described in a similiar fashion , where 60 is thought of roughly as a spherical system with continuous rotational symmetry , invariant under the group @xmath7 .
this leads to electronic multiplets , labeled by @xmath8 with degeneracy @xmath9 .
the true molecule has only discrete icosahedral ( @xmath10 ) symmetry ; and , as is commonly done in crystal field theory , a correspondence can be made between the multiplets under the approximate high symmetry group and their descendants under the lower symmetry .
this correspondence between orbitals under @xmath7 and orbitals under @xmath10 was made by haddon @xcite the @xmath7 multiplets order with energy increasing with increasing @xmath8 , implying that the energy scale associated with changes in radial quantum number , @xmath11 , is much larger than the rotational energy scale , @xmath12 , where @xmath13 is the length scale of the spherical potential and @xmath14 is the electron mass .
the most energetic of the 60 @xmath15-electrons therefore occupy the @xmath16 multiplet . under the lower symmetry
@xmath10 , multiplets of the spherical model for @xmath17 are split under @xmath10 , as icosahedral symmetry can not support an orbital degeneracy larger than 5 . for the occupied orbitals , these gaps are smaller than the spacing between adjacent @xmath8 multiplets ; consequently , the correlation between @xmath8 multiplets and nearly degenerate manifolds in 60 is clear .
we expect the comparison of vibrations of an elastic shell to that of the 60 molecule to give qualitative insight , but we certainly do not expect close quantitative agreement .
the continuum elastic approximation is only justified for the lowest frequency modes such that @xmath18 , where @xmath19 is a typical nearest - neighbor distance , and @xmath20 is the transverse speed of sound on the shell .
furthermore , the linear elastic approximation assumes only local interactions .
it is known that for force constant models to get good agreement with the experimentally measured vibrations of 60 , it is necessary to include up to third - nearest neighbor interactions.@xcite hence , a linear elastic model would not expect to yield good quantitative agreement with experiment over the entire spectrum . nevertheless , to deepen our understanding of the character of the complex modes of 60 , we find it useful to compare the molecular modes with those of an elastic spherical shell , where the eigenmodes and eigenfrequencies can be described by compact analytic expressions .
we summarize the results obtained by lamb @xcite concerning the vibrations of a thin spherical shell .
the modes can be divided into two classes .
modes of the first class have displacements which are purely tangential to the surface of the shell .
we denote the @xmath8th of these shear modes by @xmath21 .
the frequency spectrum of shear modes is given by @xmath22 where @xmath23 is the dimensionless frequency , @xmath24 @xmath13 is the radius of the shell , and @xmath20 is the transverse speed of sound on the shell .
we note that @xmath23 monotonically increases with increasing @xmath8 , and the lowest frequency shear mode has @xmath25 .
the modes of the second class have displacements which have radial character . of these mixed modes , the @xmath26 mode is purely radial .
its dimensionless frequency is given by @xmath27 where @xmath28 is related to the poisson ratio of the shell @xmath29 , @xmath30 the poisson ratio being the dimensionless ratio of transverse compression to longitudinal extension .
the mixed modes with @xmath31 have displacements with both radial and tangential character .
the dimensionless frequency of the @xmath32 mode is @xmath33 in the case of mixed modes with @xmath34 , each frequency has two branches whose frequencies are @xmath35^{1\over 2 } \label{m-}\ ] ] where @xmath36 .
we denote the mixed modes by @xmath37 .
we plot selected shell frequencies as a function of the poisson ratio in figs.[hy2 ] and [ hy01 ] .
we establish correlations between the modes of the shell and the modes of 60 . the breathing mode of 60 ( @xmath38 ) can be unambiguously matched with its counterpart mode of the shell , the mixed mode @xmath39 .
both modes have exclusively radial character and transform as the trivial representation of their respective symmetry groups .
60 has another mode preserving the icosahedral symmetry , but with pure tangential character @xcite .
we note that the decomposition of @xmath40 representation under @xmath10 contains @xmath41 @xcite .
we conclude that the @xmath42 mode is predominantly a descendant of the @xmath43 shell mode .
the lowest frequency mode of the shell , @xmath44 , has a degeneracy of 5 . under @xmath10
, we expect this degeneracy to still be supported . experimentally , the lowest frequency mode of 60 , the so - called squashing mode @xmath45 , has mixed displacement character @xcite and the same degeneracy as the @xmath44 mode on the shell ; thus , we infer that they are correlated .
the next lowest frequency mode of the shell , @xmath46 , has a degeneracy of 7 , which decomposes under @xmath10 into @xmath47 and @xmath48 modes .
we correlate @xmath46 with the nearly degenerate multiplet @xmath49 and @xmath50 .
similarly , the @xmath51 and @xmath52 levels must have evolved primarily from the splitting of the @xmath53 mode .
as the @xmath54 shell mode must remain unsplit , we correlate it with a @xmath55 type mode under @xmath10 .
there are two @xmath55 modes which are close in frequency . from stereographic projections @xcite of the modes ,
we conclude that @xmath56 is primarily a descendant of @xmath54 , while @xmath57 results from the splitting of the @xmath58 mode . for @xmath59 ,
mixed shell modes have small spacings compared to the splittings under @xmath10 .
there are no real predominant `` progenitor '' levels , as mixing among many shell modes must be involved in determining the final character of the displacements .
we summarize our low frequency correlations in fig .
[ corr ] .
the spectrum of the shell results from one structural parameter and two elastic parameters .
we adjust the elastic parameters to fit to the low frequency portion of the spectrum .
we use a value of 3.56 for @xmath13 , as obtained from experiment .
we estimate the following parameter values from a fit to the @xmath38 and @xmath60 modes using eqs .
[ m0 ] and [ shearf ] : @xmath61 and @xmath62 m / s .
we choose to fit to these modes as their correlation with shell modes is clear , and they stem from multiplets whose degeneracy is preserved under @xmath10 . combining eqs .
[ m0 ] and [ m1 ] , we observe that @xmath63 _ independent _ of elastic parameters .
based on our correlation diagram , we can compare this ratio to experiment .
we use the value of 493 @xmath64 for @xmath65 @xcite , and a value of 577 @xmath64 for @xmath66@xcite to obtain a ratio of @xmath67 .
the reasonable agreement with @xmath68 gives support to the interpretation of these modes as progenitors of the @xmath69 and @xmath70 modes .
a comparison of selected spherical model frequencies to experimental frequencies is given in table i. perhaps the real utility of the correlations made is that the known analytic forms of the eigenmodes might be used to approximate displacement fields in calculations .
we thank f. anderson , w. leenstra , and j. wu for valuable discussions .
acknowledgment is made to the donors of the petroleum research fund , administered by the american chemical society , for support of this research .
|
superconductivity of 60-derived solids to vibrational spectrum 60 microscopic understanding superconductivity requires vibrational modes computational studies vibrational frequencies experiment insight comparing vibrational spectrum of - spherical 60 with continuum analog spherical shell electronic structure of 60 spherical system with continuous rotational symmetry invariant under group @xmath7 leads to electronic multiplets labeled with degeneracy @xmath9 true molecule has discrete icosahedral ( @xmath10 ) symmetry correspondence between multiplets under high symmetry group lower symmetry correspondence between orbitals @xmath7 and @xmath10 @xmath7 multiplets with energy increasing energy scale with changes radial quantum number larger than rotational energy scale @xmath12 @xmath13 length spherical potential electron mass most energetic 60 @xmath15-electrons occupy @xmath16 multiplet under lower symmetry @xmath10 multiplets of spherical model for @xmath17 split under @xmath10 icosahedral symmetry support orbital degeneracy larger than 5 .occupied orbitals gaps smaller than between @xmath8 multiplets correlation between degenerate manifolds in 60 clear expect comparison of vibrations elastic shell to 60 molecule qualitative insight close quantitative agreement continuum elastic approximation justified for lowest frequency modes @xmath18 @xmath19 nearest - neighbor distance @xmath20 transverse speed sound linear elastic approximation assumes local interactions for force constant models agreement with vibrations 60 include third - nearest neighbor interactions linear elastic model quantitative agreement over entire spectrum understanding complex modes 60 compare molecular modes with elastic spherical shell eigenmodes eigenfrequencies described by compact analytic expressions summarize results by @xcite vibrations thin spherical shell modes divided into two classes first class have displacements tangential to surface shell denote @xmath8th modes by @xmath21 frequency spectrum of by @xmath22 @xmath23 dimensionless frequency @xmath24 @xmath13 radius shell @xmath20 transverse speed of sound @xmath23 increases with @xmath8 lowest frequency shear mode has @xmath25 modes second class have displacements radial character @xmath26 mode purely radial dimensionless frequency by @xmath27 @xmath28 related to poisson ratio shell @xmath29 @xmath30 poisson dimensionless ratio transverse compression to longitudinal extension mixed modes @xmath31 have displacements radial tangential dimensionless frequency @xmath32 mode is @xmath33 mixed modes @xmath34 each frequency two branches @xmath35 @xmath36 denote mixed modes by @xmath37 plot shell frequencies function poisson ratio in figs. correlations between modes shell modes 60 breathing mode 60 @xmath38 matched with mixed mode @xmath39 both modes radial character transform trivial representation symmetry groups 60 mode symmetry tangential character decomposition @xmath40 under @xmath10 contains @xmath41 @xcite @xmath42 mode descendant of @xmath43 shell mode lowest frequency mode @xmath44 degeneracy 5 under @xmath10 degeneracy supportedlowest frequency mode 60 @xmath45 mixed displacement character same degeneracy as @xmath44 mode infer correlated lowest frequency mode @xmath46 degeneracy 7 decomposes under @xmath10 into @xmath47 @xmath48 modes correlate @xmath46 with degenerate @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 @xmath52 levels evolved from splitting @xmath53 mode @xmath54 shell mode unsplit correlate with @xmath55 type mode @xmath10 two @xmath55 modes close in frequency stereographic projections @xmath56 descendant of @xmath54 @xmath57 from splitting @xmath58 mode @xmath59 mixed shell modes have small spacings @xmath10 no predominant progenitor levels mixing shell modes final character displacements summarize low frequency correlations in fig . [ corr ] spectrum shell one structural parameter two elastic parameters adjust elastic parameters to fit low frequency portion spectrum use value 3.56 for @xmath13 estimate parameter values @xmath38 @xmath60 modes using @xmath61 @xmath62fit modes correlation with shell modes clear stem from multiplets degeneracy preserved under @xmath10 combining m0 m1 @xmath63 independent of elastic parameters correlation compare ratio to experiment use 493 @xmath64 for @xmath65 @xcite 577 @xmath64 for @xmath66@xcite ratio @xmath67 agreement with @xmath68 modes progenitors @xmath69 @xmath70 modes comparison spherical model frequencies to experimental frequencies in table i utility correlations analytic forms eigenmodes approximate displacement fields calculations thank f. anderson w. leenstra j. wu discussions acknowledgment donors petroleum research fund american chemical society support research
| 0.311289
| 1,882
| 980
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,342
|
selex took data in the 1996/7 fixed target run at fermilab .
the excellent performance parameters of the selex rich detector had direct influence on the quality of the obtained physics results .
|
the fermilab experiment e781 ( selex ) : a segmented large @xmath0 baryon spectrometer @xcite , which took data in the 1996/97 fixed target run at fermilab , is designed to perform high statistics studies of production mechanisms and decay physics of charmed and charmed - strange baryons such as @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
the physics goals of the experiment require good charged particle identification to look for the different baryon decay modes .
one must be able to separate @xmath5 , @xmath6 and @xmath7 over a wide momentum range when looking for charmed baryon decays like @xmath8 .
a rich detector with a 2848 phototube photocathode array has been constructed @xcite to do this .
the detector begins about @xmath9 downstream of the charm production target , with two analysis magnets with @xmath10 @xmath11-kick each in - between , and is surrounded by multi - wire proportional and drift chambers which provide particle tracking .
the average number of tracks reaching the rich is about 5 per event .
first results from this detector can be found in @xcite .
a detailed description of the detector itself is given in @xcite .
in this article we first describe shortly the main parts of the detector ( vessel , mirrors , photon detector ) , after this we will review its stability during the run and performance for physics analyses .
finally we report about physics results obtained with the help of the rich up to now .
a detailed description can be found in @xcite . here we will repeat the main features only .
the selex rich detector consists of a @xmath12 long vessel with @xmath13diameter , filled with pure neon at atmospheric pressure .
after initial filling to a slight ( @xmath14 ) overpressure , the vessel was perfectly tight for a period of more than 15 months . at the end of the vessel an array of 16 hexagonal spherical mirrors
is mounted on a low - mass hex - panel with 3-point mounts to form a sphere of @xmath15 radius .
each mirror is @xmath16 thick , made out of low - expansion class , and has a reflectivity @xmath17 at @xmath18 . before evaporating ,
the quality of every mirror was measured @xcite .
the phototube matrix at the focal plane consists of 2848 @xmath19photomultipliers in a hexagonal closed packed matrix of 89 columns in 32 rows .
one column of 32 phototubes is connected to one common high voltage . in the center part ,
alternating columns of hamamatsu r760 and feu60 tubes are employed , and in the outer part only feu60 tubes are used .
every phototube is connected to a preamplifier - discriminator - ecl driver hybrid chip , and the readout of the signals is performed with a standard wire - chamber electronics @xcite with @xmath20 integration time .
the whole vessel is tilted by @xmath21 so particles are not passing through the phototubes .
the detector performance over the 15 month running period was very stable . in the central region ( mixed r760 and feu60 ) we observed on average 13.6 photons for a @xmath22 particle , corresponding to a figure of merit @xcite @xmath23 , and in the outside ( only feu60 ) we obtained @xmath24 . the refractive index , measured in several different ways , was stable to better than @xmath25 , which would change the ring radius at @xmath22 by less than @xmath26 of its resolution .
the single photon resolution was estimated to be @xmath27 , with the biggest contribution coming from the size of the phototubes .
the ring radius resolution for the typical multitrack environment was measured at @xmath28 .
= = in fig .
[ radii ] we show the distribution of ring radii for single track events , where one can identify eight particles and eight anti - particles , demonstrating the huge dynamic range of this detector . with the same dataset we measured the noise of the detector , by counting
the number of hits not assigned to a ring , taking into account the integration time of the readout electronics .
= the result is shown in fig .
[ noise ] , for the two different types of phototubes used . for beam - off events we observed on average 6 hits . for particle identification
, we calculate likelihoods for different particle hypotheses @xcite , using information from the tracking system . with the help of kinematically reconstructed signals we measure the identification efficiency for different cuts .
for protons ( using @xmath29 decays ) in the momentum range @xmath30 , the identification efficiency is around @xmath31 , and even below proton threshold ( @xmath32 ) , the efficiency is above @xmath33 @xcite , with a mis - identification rate of a few percent , which can be attributed to tracking errors . the same is true for kaons @xcite .
= pions from charm decays have usually lower momenta than other decay products ; for that reason in selex we accept as pions in charm analysis also tracks which do not reach the rich .
should the track be within the rich acceptance , we require the ratio of the likelihood of that track to be a pion to all other particles to be @xmath34 . in fig .
[ pions ] we show that the identification efficiency is above @xmath33 without a sharp turn - on .
selex submitted first publications in 1999 , after first reports at conferences in 1998 . to date
selex has published seven papers and two more are submitted .
some papers on mesons and hyperons do not use the rich in their analyses @xcite , but for charm physics the rich proved to be essential in the analysis , reducing the background significantly but still having high efficiency .
selex published measurements of the @xmath35 @xcite and @xmath36 @xcite lifetimes , where the rich was essential in suppressing reflection below the mass peak stemming from mis - identified daughter particles . the measurement of production properties of @xmath37 @xcite with 4 different beam particles ( @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath7 , @xmath40 ) also benefitted largely from the rich . more hadroproduction results for @xmath41 , @xmath42 , and @xmath36 are in preparation @xcite .
selex also observed for the first time a cabbibo suppressed decay mode of a charmed strange baryon , the @xmath43 @xcite .
just recently , selex reported on the first observation of doubly - charmed baryons @xcite .
the rich detector is an essential part of the physics analysis in selex , due to its high efficiency and large dynamic range .
it fulfilled all the design criteria .
with seven papers already published plus two submitted , the collaboration is preparing at this moment several more publications to be submitted in the near future .
after a first pass over all data taken ( @xmath44 interactions , @xmath45 events on tape ) in 1998/9 , from which all of the publications to date were obtained , we finished a second pass with improved reconstruction software in 2001 .
the analysis of these data is just starting and many more results are expected .
the authors are greatful for stimulating discussions with the selex collaboration members .
they wish to thank the technical staff of their institutes for their support .
this work was supported by the us department of energy under contract no .
de - ac02 - 76cho3000 , the russian ministry of science and technology , and consejo nacional de ciencia y tecnologa ( mexico ) .
selex collaboration : carnegie - mellon university , fermi national accelerator laboratory , university of iowa , university of rochester , university of hawaii , university of michigan flint , ball state , petersburg nuclear physics institute , itep ( moscow ) , ihep ( protvino ) , moscow state university , university of so paulo , centro brasileiro de pesquisas fisicas ( rio de janeiro ) , universidade federal da paraiba , ihep ( beijing ) , university of bristol , tel aviv university , max - planck - institut fr kernphysik ( heidelberg ) , university of trieste , university of rome `` la sapienza '' , infn , universidad autnoma de san luis potos , bogazici university .
+ http://fn781a.fnal.gov selex collaboration , j.s .
et al . _ , in : _ proceedings of the 29th international conference on high energy physics _ , 1998 , edited by a. astbury _
( world scientific , singapore , 1998 ) , vol .
ii , p. 1259 .
preprint hep - ex/9812031 .
|
fermilab experiment e781 ( selex ) segmented large @xmath0 baryon spectrometer took data 1996/97 target run designed high statistics studies of production mechanisms decay physics of charmed - strange baryons @xmath1 @xmath4 physics goals require good charged particle identification baryon decay modes separate @xmath5 @xmath6 @xmath7 wide momentum range charmed baryon decays like @xmath8 rich detector with 2848 phototube photocathode array constructed detector begins @xmath9 downstream of charm production target two analysis magnets @xmath10 @xmath11-kick surrounded by multi - wire proportional drift chambers particle tracking average tracks reaching rich 5 per event first results detector in @xcite detailed description main parts vessel mirrors photon detector review stability performance for physics analyses report physics results obtained rich selex rich detector @xmath12 long vessel @xmath13diameter filled with pure neon at atmospheric pressure after initial filling overpressure vessel tight for 15 monthsend vessel 16 hexagonal spherical mirrors on low - mass hex - panel 3-point mounts sphere @xmath15 radius each mirror @xmath16 thick low - expansion class reflectivity @xmath17 @xmath18 quality measured @xcite phototube matrix focal plane 2848 @xmath19photomultipliers hexagonal matrix 89 columns 32 rows one column connected high voltage center part hamamatsu r760 feu60 tubes outer part only feu60 tubes phototube connected to preamplifier - discriminator - ecl driver hybrid chip readout signals standard wire - chamber electronics @xcite @xmath20 integration time vessel tilted by @xmath21 particles not passing through phototubes detector performance 15 month stable central region 13.6 photons for @xmath22 particle merit @xcite @xmath23 outside feu60 @xmath24 refractive index stable better than @xmath25 ring radius less single photon resolution estimated @xmath27 contribution from size phototubes ring radius resolution typical multitrack environment measured @xmath28 fig radii show distribution ring radii single track events eight particles eight anti - particles dynamic range detector measured noise counting hits not assigned ring integration time readout electronics result shown fig . noise two types phototubes beam - off events observed average 6 hits particle identification calculate likelihoods particle hypotheses @xcite information tracking system kinematically reconstructed signals measure identification efficiency cuts protons @xmath29 decays momentum range @xmath30 identification efficiency around @xmath31 below proton threshold @xmath32 efficiency above @xmath33 @xcite mis - identification rate few percent tracking errors same kaons @xcite pions from charm decays lower momenta decay products selex accept pions charm analysis tracks not reach rich track within rich acceptance require ratio likelihood track pion to other particles @xmath34 fig . [ pions identification efficiency above @xmath33 without sharp turn - on selex submitted first publications 1999 reports conferences 1998 published seven papers two more submitted papers on mesons hyperons use rich analyses for charm physics rich essential analysis reducing background high efficiencyselex published measurements @xmath35 @xmath36 lifetimes rich essential suppressing reflection below mass peak mis - identified daughter particles measurement production properties @xmath37 @xcite with 4 beam particles benefitted from rich more hadroproduction results for @xmath41 @xmath36 in preparation selex observed cabbibo suppressed decay mode charmed strange baryon @xmath43 @xcite recently reported first observation doubly - charmed baryons @xcite rich detector essential physics analysis high efficiency large dynamic range fulfilled design criteria seven papers published two submitted collaboration preparing more publications first pass over data @xmath44 interactions @xmath45 events 1998/9 finished second pass with improved reconstruction software in 2001 analysis data starting more results expected authors greatful for discussions with selex collaboration members thank technical staff support work supported by us department of energy russian ministry of science technology consejo nacional de ciencia y tecnologa mexicoselex collaboration carnegie - mellon university fermi national accelerator laboratory iowa rochester hawaii michigan state petersburg nuclear physics institute itep moscow protvino moscow state university so paulo pesquisas rio janeiro universidade federal paraiba ihep beijing bristol tel aviv university max - planck institut kernphysik heidelberg university trieste rome universidad san luis potos bogazici university http://fn781a.fnal.gov selex collaboration j proceedings 29th international conference high energy 1998 edited astbury world scientific singapore vol ii p. 1259 preprint/9812031
| 0.315073
| 1,950
| 987
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,343
|
we study dynamics of two coupled periodically driven oscillators .
important example of such a system is a dynamic vibration absorber which consists of a small mass attached to the primary vibrating system of a large mass .
periodic solutions of the approximate effective equation are determined within the krylov - bogoliubov - mitropolsky approach to get the amplitude profiles @xmath0 .
dependence of the amplitude @xmath1 of nonlinear resonances on the frequency @xmath2 is much more complicated than in the case of one duffing oscillator and hence new nonlinear phenomena are possible . in the present paper
we study metamorphoses of the function @xmath0 induced by changes of the control parameters .
|
coupled oscillators play important role in many scientific fields , e.g. biology , electronics , and mechanics , see awrejcewicz1991,kozlowski1995,kuznetsov2009 and references therein . in this paper
we analyse two coupled oscillators , one of which is driven by an external periodic force .
important example of such system is a dynamic vibration absorber which consists of a mass @xmath3 , attached to the primary vibrating system of mass @xmath4 @xcite .
equations describing dynamics of such system are of form:@xmath5where @xmath6 , @xmath7 and @xmath8 , @xmath9 represent ( nonlinear ) force of internal friction and ( nonlinear ) elastic restoring force for mass @xmath4 and mass @xmath3 , respectively . in the present paper
we do not assume that the ratio @xmath10 is small .
in the present paper we shall consider a simplified model:@xmath11 dynamics of coupled periodically driven oscillators is very complicated awrejcewicz1991,kozlowski1995,kuznetsov2009 .
we simplified the set equations ( [ model1 ] ) , ( [ simplified ] ) by reducing it to the problem of motion of two independent oscillators .
more exactly , we derived the exact fourth - order nonlinear equation for internal motion as well as approximate second - order effective equation in @xcite . moreover , applying the krylov - bogoliubov - mitropolsky method to these equations we have computed the corresponding nonlinear resonances ( cf .
@xcite for the case of the effective equation ) .
dependence of the amplitude @xmath1 of nonlinear resonances on the frequency @xmath12 is much more complicated than in the case of duffing oscillator and hence new nonlinear phenomena are possible . in the present paper
we study metamorphoses of the function @xmath13 induced by changes of the control parameters .
the paper is organized as follows . in the next section derivation of the exact 4th - order equation for the internal motion and approximate 2nd - order effective equations in non - dimensional form
are presented . in section 3 metamorphoses of amplitude profiles determined within the krylov - bogoliubov - mitropolsky approach for the approximate 2nd - order effective equation
are studied and the case of the standard duffing equation is presented as well .
more exactly , theory of algebraic curves is used to compute singular points on effective equation amplitude profiles - metamorphoses of amplitude profiles occur in neighbourhoods of such points . in section
4 examples of analytical and numerical computations are presented for the effective equation .
our results are summarized and perspectives of further studies are described in the last section .
in new variables , @xmath14 , @xmath15 , equations ( model1 ) , ( [ simplified ] ) can be written as : @xmath16 where @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 , @xmath22 .
adding equations ( [ model2 ] ) we obtain important relation between variables @xmath23 and @xmath24 : @xmath25 where @xmath26 .
we can eliminate variable @xmath23 in ( [ model2 ] ) to obtain the following exact equation for relative motion : @xmath27where @xmath28 , @xmath29 and @xmath30 is a nondimensional parameter .
equations ( [ 4th - a ] ) , ( relation ) are equivalent to the initial equations ( [ model1 ] ) , ( simplified ) @xcite . in the present work
we assume : @xmath31 we thus get:@xmath32 we shall write eq .
( [ 4th - b ] ) in nondimensional form . introducing nondimensional time @xmath33 and rescaling variable @xmath24 : @xmath34 where:@xmath35we get the exact equation for motion of mass @xmath36 : @xmath37where nondimensional constants are given by:@xmath38 we shall consider hierarchy of approximate equations arising from ( 4th-4c ) . for small @xmath39 we can reject the second term on the left in ( [ 4th-4c ] ) to obtain the approximate equation:@xmath40which can be integrated partly to yield the effective equation:@xmath41where transient states
has been omitted @xcite . and finally , for @xmath42 we get the duffing equation:@xmath43
we applied the krylov - bogoliubov - mitropolsky ( kbm ) perturbation approach @xcite to the effective equation ( [ effective ] ) obtaining for the @xmath44 resonance the following amplitude profile okninski2006:@xmath45now , for @xmath42 , we obtain the amplitude profile for the duffing equation ( [ duffing]):@xmath46 it is well known that dependence of the function @xmath47 , cf .
( [ aduff ] ) , on control parameters @xmath48 , @xmath49 is rather simple . on the other hand , dependence of the amplitude profile @xmath50 on control parameters @xmath48 ,
@xmath49 , @xmath51 , @xmath52 is more complicated and thus @xmath53 can describe new nonlinear phenomena . in the next section we shall study possible metamorphoses of @xmath47 , @xmath54 induced by changes of control parameters , the more complicated case of the 4th - order exact equation ( [ 4th-4c ] ) will be treated elsewhere .
equations ( [ aduff ] ) , ( [ aeff ] ) define the corresponding amplitude profiles implicitly .
such amplitude profiles can be classified as planar algebraic curves .
firstly , we shall collect useful theorems on implicit functions which will be used below .
let us write equations ( [ aeff ] ) , ( [ aduff ] ) as @xmath55 and @xmath56 , respectively , where @xmath57 , @xmath58:@xmath59 it follows from general theory of implicit functions @xcite that conditions for critical points of @xmath60 read : @xmath61moreover , critical points of the inverse function @xmath62 are given by:@xmath63 it may happen that in some points @xmath64 we have:@xmath65 such points are referred to as singular points of algebraic curve @xmath66 because they are in some sense exceptional .
singular points of the algebraic curve defined by ( [ fd ] ) are given by:@xmath67 the set of equations ( [ fd ] ) , ( [ sd1 ] ) , ( [ sd2 ] ) can be written as:@xmath68where @xmath69 are positive .
general solution reads:@xmath70 it follows that @xmath71 , @xmath72 and @xmath73 and thus the system of equations ( [ d1 ] ) , ( [ d2 ] ) , ( [ d3 ] ) has no acceptable solutions since we assume that @xmath74 are real and @xmath75 are non - negative .
singular points of the algebraic curve defined by ( [ feff ] ) are given by equations:@xmath76 it follows from ( [ feff ] ) and ( [ se2 ] ) that either of equations must hold : [ cases ] @xmath77where @xmath69 are positive .
let us start with eq.([case2 ] ) .
in this case we obtain from ( [ feff ] ) , ( [ se1 ] ) and ( [ case2 ] ) the following rather special solution : @xmath78 let us now consider more general eq.([case1 ] ) .
we can treat @xmath79 as arbitrary .
then we obtain two solutions for @xmath80:@xmath81where the inequality@xmath82must hold .
this means that for a chosen value of @xmath79 the parameter @xmath49 must obey@xmath83 solving equations ( [ feff ] ) , ( [ se1 ] ) , and ( [ y1 ] ) or ( [ y2 ] ) we get:@xmath84where @xmath85 and @xmath86 , @xmath87 are given by:@xmath88with@xmath89@xmath90@xmath91@xmath92
it follows from solutions obtained in the preceding section that we can control position of a singular point .
more exactly , we choose a value of @xmath79 and then @xmath49 fulfilling inequality ( [ ineqh ] ) can be chosen as well .
next we specify @xmath48 and then @xmath80 , @xmath51 , @xmath52 are computed from eqs .
( [ y ] ) , ( [ a ] ) , ( [ h ] ) . in this process
the position of the singular point @xmath96 and values of control parameters @xmath52 , @xmath49 , @xmath48 , @xmath97 are determined ( provided that the solutions are real ) .
bifurcation diagram for the effective equation ( [ effective ] ) for the following values of control parameters @xmath98 , @xmath99 , @xmath100 , @xmath101 is shown in fig .
[ f1 ] ( cf .
fig . 1 _ _
_ _ in @xcite ) where colours mark different initial conditions .
@xmath102{fig1.eps}\ ] ] position of the @xmath44 resonance agrees well with the amplitude profile , computed for the same parameters , cf .
[ f2 ] and discussion in @xcite .
we shall now compute coordinates of a singular point using equations ( [ y ] ) , ( [ a ] ) , ( [ h ] ) .
at first we choose the value of @xmath79 as @xmath103 @xmath104 .
then we can select any value of @xmath49 obeying inequality ( [ ineqh ] ) .
we thus put @xmath105 to get from eq .
( [ y1 ] ) @xmath106 @xmath107 .
next we choose @xmath108 to compute from ( [ a ] ) , ( [ h ] ) @xmath109 , @xmath110 . in fig .
[ f3 ] below we show amplitude profiles computed from eq .
( [ aeff ] ) for critical parameter values @xmath111 , and for two more values of @xmath52 , @xmath112 and @xmath113 .
@xmath102{fig2.eps}\ ] ] @xmath102{fig3.eps}\ ] ] the critical ( red ) curve intersects itself in singular point @xmath114 or @xmath115 .
green curve corresponds to @xmath116 while blue curve has been computed for @xmath117 ( other parameter values unchanged ) .
the initial amplitude from fig .
[ f1 ] was also shown ( black curve ) .
the first bifurcation diagram , cf .
[ f4 ] , was computed for @xmath118 and corresponds to the green curve in fig .
we note that the small branch of the @xmath44 resonance is discontinuous in agreement with the amplitude profile shown in fig .
[ f3 ] ( green curve ) .
the next bifurcation digram , fig .
[ f5 ] , has been computed for critical value @xmath119 determined numerically from eq .
( [ effective ] ) ( this differs slightly from the critical value @xmath110 determined from the kbm solution as described above ) .
@xmath120{fig4.eps}\ ] ] @xmath120{fig5.eps}\ ] ] and finally , the last bifurcation diagram was computed for @xmath117 - and again the small branch of the @xmath44 resonance is continuous .
@xmath120{fig6.eps}\ ] ] it follows from results presented in section that for @xmath103 , @xmath105 , @xmath121 there is another singular point .
indeed , we can compute @xmath80 from another of equations ( [ y ] ) to get from eqs .
( [ a ] ) , ( [ h ] ) @xmath122 @xmath123 , @xmath124 , @xmath125 . @xmath102{fig7.eps}\ ] ] in fig . [ f7 ] amplitude profiles computed from eq .
( [ aeff ] ) for critical parameter values @xmath126 and for two other values of @xmath52 , @xmath127 and @xmath112 have been shown .
bifurcation diagrams for @xmath128 and @xmath129 are shown below .
@xmath120{fig8.eps}\ ] ] @xmath120{fig9.eps}\ ] ]
in this work we have studied metamorphoses of amplitude profiles for the effective equation , describing approximately dynamics of two coupled periodically driven oscillators .
our analysis has been analytical although based on the approximate kbm method .
theory of algebraic curves has been used to compute singular points on effective equation amplitude profiles .
it follows from general theory that metamorphoses of amplitude profiles occur in neighbourhoods of such points . in section 3
we have computed analytically positions of singular points for the amplitude profiles @xmath0 determined within the krylov - bogoliubov - mitropolsky approach for the approximate 2nd - order effective equation ( [ effective ] ) . in the first case
the singular point corresponds to self - intersection of @xmath0 , see fig .
f3 , while in the second case it is a isolated point , cf .
[ f7 ] .
it is interesting that the solution described in section 3 permits control of position of singular point : we choose arbitrary value of variable @xmath79 @xmath130 , then value of the parameter @xmath49 obeying inequality ( [ inequality ] ) is selected .
finally the value of the control parameter @xmath48 is chosen and @xmath80 , @xmath51 , @xmath52 are computed from eqs .
( y ) , ( [ a ] ) , ( [ h ] ) ; it should be stressed that we have not come across any difficulties to obtain real solutions .
we hope to carry full analysis of conditions guaranteeing existence of real solutions in our future papers . as a by - product
we have demonstrated that there are no singular points for @xmath0 computed for the duffing equation in agreement with well established numerical experience .
we have also computed numerically bifurcation diagrams in the neighbourhoods of singular points and indeed dynamics of the effective equation ( [ effective ] ) changes according to metamorphoses of the corresponding amplitude profiles .
a. okniski , j. kyzio , perturbation analysis of the effective equation for two coupled periodically driven oscillators , differential equations and nonlinear mechanics 2006 ( 2006 ) , article i d 56146 , 10 pages .
|
coupled oscillators in scientific fields biology electronics mechanics awrejcewicz1991,kozlowski1995,kuznetsov2009 paper analyse two coupled oscillators one driven by external periodic force example is dynamic vibration absorber mass @xmath3 attached to primary vibrating system mass @xmath4 equations dynamics:@xmath5where @xmath6 @xmath7 represent nonlinear force of internal friction nonlinear elastic restoring force for mass @xmath4 @xmath3 assume ratio @xmath10 is small consider simplified model:@xmath11 dynamics of coupled periodically driven oscillators complicated simplified equations to problem of motion of two independent oscillators derived fourth - order nonlinear equation for internal motion second - order effective equation in @xcite krylov - bogoliubov - mitropolsky method computed corresponding nonlinear resonances dependence of amplitude @xmath1 of nonlinear resonances on frequency @xmath12 complicated new nonlinear phenomena possible study metamorphoses of function @xmath13 induced by changes control parameters paper organizednext section derivation 4th - order equation internal motion 2nd - order equations non - dimensional presented section 3 metamorphoses amplitude profiles krylov - bogoliubov - mitropolsky approach 2nd - order effective equation studied standard duffing equation presented theory algebraic curves compute points effective equation amplitude profiles metamorphoses neighbourhoods points section 4 numerical computations effective equation results summarized perspectives further studies last section new variables @xmath14 @xmath15 equations model1 written @xmath16 @xmath17 adding equations model2 ] relation variables @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 @xmath26 eliminate variable @xmath23 model2 obtain exact equation relative motion @xmath27where @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath30 nondimensional parameter equations 4th - a ] ) equivalent initial equations model1 simplified assume @xmath31 get:@xmath32 write eq . 4th - b ] ) nondimensional formnondimensional time @xmath33 rescaling variable @xmath24 @xmath34 exact equation motion mass @xmath36 nondimensional constants@xmath38 hierarchy approximate equations from ( 4th-4c ) small @xmath39 reject second term 4th-4c ] ) approximate equation@xmath40which integrated effective equation@xmath41where transient states omitted @xmath42 duffing equation@xmath43 krylov - bogoliubov - mitropolsky perturbation approach @xcite effective equation @xmath44 resonance amplitude profile@xmath45now @xmath42 amplitude profile duffing equation@xmath46 dependence function @xmath47 on control parameters @xmath48 @xmath49 simple dependence amplitude profile @xmath50 control parameters @xmath48 complicated @xmath53 new nonlinear phenomena next section study metamorphoses @xmath47 @xmath54 changes control parameters complicated case 4th - order exact equation ( 4th-4c ] ) treated elsewhere equations aduff aeff ] ) define amplitude profiles profiles planar algebraic curvescollect theorems on implicit functions write equations ( [ aeff [ aduff as @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57@xmath59 theory functions conditions for critical points of @xmath60 critical points inverse function @xmath62 given by@xmath63 points @xmath64@xmath65 singular points of algebraic curve @xmath66 exceptional singular points defined by ( [ fd ] ) given by@xmath67 equations ( [ fd ] sd1 sd2 ] written as@xmath68where @xmath69 positive solution reads:@xmath70 @xmath71 system of equations ( [ d1 ] d2 [ d3 ] ) no acceptable solutions @xmath74 real @xmath75 non - negative singular points defined by ( [ feff ] ) given by equations@xmath76 equations must hold : [ cases ] @xmath77where @xmath69 positive start with eq.([case2 ] ) obtain from [ feff ] se1 case2 special solution : @xmath78 consider general eq.([case1 ] ) treat @xmath79 as arbitraryobtain two solutions for @xmath80 inequality@xmath82must hold chosen value @xmath79 parameter @xmath49 must obey@xmath83 solving equations y1 y2 get@xmath84where @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 given by@xmath88with@xmath89@xmath90@xmath92 control position of singular point choose value @xmath79 @xmath49 inequality chosen specify @xmath48 @xmath80 @xmath51 @xmath52 computed from eqs ( [ y ] [ a ] ) [ h ] ) position of singular point @xmath96 values of control parameters @xmath52 @xmath49 @xmath48 @xmath97 determined solutions real bifurcation diagram for effective equation for values control parameters @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 shown in fig . [ f1 ] colours mark initial conditions @xmath102 position @xmath44 resonance agrees with amplitude profile same parameters compute coordinates singular point using equations ( [ y ] ) [ a ] ) [ h ] )choose value @xmath79 as @xmath103 @xmath104 select value @xmath49 obeying inequality put @xmath105 from eq @xmath106 @xmath107 choose @xmath108 compute from @xmath109 @xmath110 fig . f3 amplitude profiles computed from eq for critical parameter values @xmath111 values @xmath52 @xmath112 @xmath113 @xmath102 critical red curve intersects in singular point @xmath114 or @xmath115 green curve corresponds @xmath116 blue curve computed for @xmath117 other parameter values unchanged initial amplitude from fig . f1 shown black curve first bifurcation diagram computed for @xmath118 corresponds to green curve small branch @xmath44 resonance discontinuous with amplitude profile fig f3 next bifurcation digram f5 computed for critical value @xmath119 determined from eq . differs slightly from critical value @xmath110 determined from kbm solution @xmath120{fig4.eps last bifurcation diagram computed for @xmath117 small branch @xmath44 resonance continuous@xmath120{fig6.eps} results @xmath103 another singular point compute @xmath80 from @xmath122 @xmath102{fig7.eps} . [ f7 ] amplitude profiles computed from eq . for critical parameter values @xmath126 values @xmath52 @xmath112 shown bifurcation diagrams for @xmath128 @xmath129 shown below @xmath120{fig8.eps} @xmath120{fig9.eps} studied metamorphoses of amplitude profiles effective equation dynamics two coupled driven oscillators analysis analytical based kbm method theory of algebraic curves compute singular points equation amplitude profiles metamorphoses amplitude profiles occur in neighbourhoods of points section 3 computed analytically positions of singular points for amplitude profiles @xmath0 krylov - bogoliubov - mitropolsky approach 2nd - order effective equation first case singular point corresponds to self - intersection of @xmath0 fig . f3 second case isolated pointsolution section 3 permits control position singular point choose arbitrary value variable @xmath79 @xmath130 value parameter @xmath49 obeying inequality selected value control parameter @xmath48 chosen @xmath80 computed from eqs ( y ) a ] ) h ] ) difficulties obtain real solutions hope full analysis solutions future papers no singular points for @xmath0 duffing equation numerical experience computed bifurcation diagrams neighbourhoods singular points dynamics effective equation changes according metamorphoses amplitude profiles a. okniski j. kyzio perturbation analysis effective equation for two coupled periodically driven oscillators differential equations nonlinear mechanics 2006 article i d 56146 10 pages
| 0.498457
| 3,214
| 1,675
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,345
|
a number of recent studies have estimated the inter - galactic void probability function and investigated its departure from various random models .
we study a family of parametric statistical models based on gamma distributions , which do give realistic descriptions for other stochastic porous media .
gamma distributions contain as a special case the exponential distributions , which correspond to the ` random ' void size probability arising from poisson processes .
the random case corresponds to the information - theoretic maximum entropy or maximum uncertainty model .
lower entropy models correspond on the one hand to more ` clustered ' structures or ` more dispersed ' structures than expected at random .
the space of parameters is a surface with a natural riemannian structure , the fisher information metric .
this surface contains the poisson processes as an isometric embedding and provides the geometric setting for quantifying departures from randomness and perhaps on which may be written evolutionary dynamics for the void size distribution .
estimates are obtained for the two parameters of the void diameter distribution for an illustrative example of data published by fairall .
+ * keywords * gamma distribution , void distribution , randomness , information geometry + msc classes : 85a40 ; 60d05
|
a number of studies over the past ten years have estimated the inter - galactic void probability function and investigated its departure from randomness .
the basic random model is that arising from a poisson process of mean density @xmath0 galaxies per unit volume in a large box . then , in a _ given region of volume _
@xmath1 the probability of finding exactly @xmath2 galaxies is @xmath3 so the probability that the given region is devoid of galaxies is @xmath4 then it follows that the probability density function for the continuous random variable @xmath5 in the poisson case is @xmath6 for comparison with observations , the approximation fails for very large @xmath5 since a finite volume box is involved in any catalogue .
a hierachy of @xmath7-point correlation functions needed to represent clustering of galaxies in a complete sense was devised by white @xcite and he provided explicit formulae , including their continuous limit .
in particular , he made a detailed study of the probability that a sphere of radius @xmath8 is empty and showed that formally it is symmetrically dependent on the whole hierarchy of correlation functions .
however , white concentrated his applications on the case when the underlying galaxy distribution was a poisson process , the starting point for the present approach which is concerned with geometrizing the parameter space of departures from a poisson process .
we choose a family of parametric statistical models that includes ( [ negexp ] ) as a special case .
there are of course many such families , but we take one that has been successful in modelling void size distributions in terrestrial stochastic porous media @xcite and has been used in the representation of clustering of galaxies @xcite .
the family of gamma distributions has event space @xmath9 parameters @xmath10 and probability density functions given by @xmath11 then @xmath12 and @xmath13 and we see that @xmath14 controls the mean of the distribution while the spread and shape is controlled by , @xmath15 the square of the coefficient of variation .
the special case @xmath16 corresponds to the situation when @xmath5 represents the random or poisson process in ( [ negexp ] ) with @xmath17 thus , the family of gamma distributions can model a range of stochastic processes corresponding to non - independent ` clumped ' events , for @xmath18 and dispersed events , for @xmath19 as well as the random case ( cf .
thus , if we think of this range of processes as corresponding to the possible distributions of centroids of extended objects such as galaxies that are initially distributed according to a poisson process with @xmath20 then the three possibilities are : chaotic or random structure : : with no interactions among constituents , @xmath21 clustered structure : : arising from mutually attractive interactions , @xmath22 dispersed structure : : arising from mutually repulsive interactions , @xmath23 figure [ fgamma ] shows a family of gamma distributions , all of unit mean , with @xmath24 ( 300,220)(0,0 ) ( 80,0 ) ( 45,177)@xmath25 ( 125,160)@xmath26 ( 180,70)@xmath16 ( 310,50)@xmath27 ( 300,-7)void volume @xmath5 shannon s information theoretic ` entropy ' or ` uncertainty ' for such stochastic processes ( cf .
jaynes @xcite ) is given , up to a factor , by the negative of the expectation of the logarithm of the probability density function ( [ feq ] ) , that is @xmath28 in particular , at unit mean , the maximum entropy ( or maximum uncertainty ) occurs at @xmath20 which is the random case , and then @xmath29 the ` maximum likelihood ' estimates @xmath30 of @xmath31 can be expressed in terms of the mean and mean logarithm of a set of independent observations @xmath32 these estimates are obtained in terms of the properties of @xmath33 by maximizing the ` log - likelihood ' function @xmath34 with the following result @xmath35 where @xmath36 and @xmath37 is the digamma function , the logarithmic derivative of the gamma function the usual riemannian information metric on the parameter space @xmath38 is given by @xmath39 for more details about the geometry see @xcite .
the 1-dimensional subspace parametrized by @xmath16 corresponds to the available ` random ' processes .
a path through the parameter space @xmath40 of gamma models determines a curve @xmath41\rightarrow { \cal{s } } : t\mapsto ( c_1(t),c_2(t))\ ] ] with tangent vector @xmath42 and norm @xmath43 given via ( [ gammametric ] ) by @xmath44 the information length of the curve is @xmath45 and the curve corresponding to an underlying poisson process has @xmath46 so @xmath47 and @xmath48 and the information length is @xmath49 as we know from elementary geometry , arc length is often difficult to evaluate analytically because it contains the square root of the sum of squares of derivatives .
accordingly , we sometimes use the ` energy ' of the curve instead of length for comparison between nearby curves . energy is given by integrating the _ square _ of the norm of @xmath50 @xmath51 so in the case of the curve @xmath46 the energy is @xmath52 it is easily shown that a curve of constant @xmath14 has @xmath53 where @xmath54 and @xmath55 this has energy @xmath56 locally , minimal paths joining nearby pairs of points in @xmath40 are given by the autoparallel curves or geodesics @xcite defined by ( [ gammametric ] ) .
some typical sprays of geodesics emanating from various points are provided in @xcite .
the gaussian curvature of the surface @xmath40
@xcite actually controls all of the geometry of geodesics and it is given by @xmath57 @xmath58
for a general account of large - scale structures in the universe , see fairall @xcite .
kauffmann and fairall @xcite developed a catalogue search algorithm for nearly spherical regions devoid of bright galaxies and obtained a spectrum for diameters of significant voids .
this had a peak in the range 8 - 11 @xmath59 a long tail stretching at least to 64 @xmath59 and is compatible with the recent extrapolation models of baccigalupi et al @xcite which yield an upper bound on void diameters of about 100 @xmath60 we shall return to the data of kauffmann and fairall later in this section .
simulations of sahni et al .
@xcite found strong correlation between void sizes and primordial gravitational potential at void centres ; void topologies tended to simplify with time .
ghigna et al .
@xcite found in their simulations that void statistics are sensitive to the passage from cdm to chdm models .
this suggested that the void distribution is sensitive to the type of dark matter but not to the transfer function between types .
chdm simulations gave a void probability in excess of observations , cdm simulations being somewhat better .
vogeley et al .
@xcite compared void statistics with cdm simulations of a range of cosmological models ; good agreement was achieved for samples of very bright galaxies ( @xmath61 ) but for samples containing fainter galaxies the predicted voids were reported to be ` too empty ' .
ghigna et al .
@xcite compared observational data with gaussian - initiated @xmath7-body simulations in a @xmath62 box and found that at the @xmath63 scales the void probability for chdm was significantly larger than observed .
ghigna et al .
@xcite compared simulated galaxy samples with the perseus - pisces redshift survey .
the void probability function did discriminate between dm and cdm models , the former giving particularly good agreement with the survey .
little and weinberg @xcite used similar @xmath7-body simulations , and found that the void probability was insensitive to the shape of the initial power spectrum .
watson and rowan - robinson @xcite found that standard cdm predictors do yield reasonably good void probability function estimates whereas voronoi foam models performed less well .
lachize - rey and dacosta were of the opinion that the available samples of galaxies were insufficiently representative , because of greater apparent frequency of larger voids in the southern hemisphere .
bernardeau @xcite started from a gaussian field and derived an expression for the void probability function , obtaining @xmath64 with @xmath65 the variance of the number of galaxies in volume @xmath66 this distribution has an extended large tail because it is asymptotically more like the exponential of @xmath67 than the poisson case which decays like the exponential of @xmath68 cappi et al .
@xcite examined the dependence of the void probability function on scale for a range of galaxy cluster samples , finding a general scaling to occur up to void diameters of about @xmath69 kerscher et al .
@xcite used the void probability function to obtain spatial statistics of clusters on scales @xmath70 obtaining satisfactory agreement in a model with a cosmological constant and in a model with breaking of scale invariance of perturbations .
( 300,220)(0,0 ) ( 80,0 ) ( 43,160)@xmath71 ( 300,-7)void diameter @xmath72 for our model we consider the diameter @xmath72 of a spherical void with volume @xmath73 having distribution ( [ feq ] ) .
something close to the random variable @xmath72 has direct representation in some theoretical models , for example as polyhedral diameters in voronoi tesselations @xcite .
( 300,220)(0,0 ) ( 50,0 ) the probability density function for @xmath72 is given by @xmath74 then the mean @xmath75 variance @xmath76 and coefficient of variation @xmath77 of @xmath72 are given , respectively , by @xmath78 the fact that the coefficient of variation ( [ cvd ] ) depends only on @xmath79 gives a rapid fitting of data to ( [ dpdf ] ) .
numerical fitting to ( [ cvd ] ) gives @xmath80 this substituted in ( [ meand ] ) yields an estimate of @xmath14 to fit a given observational mean . by way of illustration
, this has been done in figure [ kfzcat ] for the zcat / src data from kauffmann and fairall @xcite figure 8a ( cf also @xcite figure 6.5 ) , both set to unit mean diameter the true mean for that catalogue was about @xmath81 the fitted values were @xmath82 and @xmath83 this fit is not particularly good if the reported peaks are not an artifact but , qualitatively , we observe that the fitted value @xmath84 is apparently significantly less than @xmath85 which would correspond to the random model .
we conclude tentatively that , for the zcat / src data subjected to the kauffmann and fairall search algorithm , the new model suggests clumping rather than dispersion in the underlying stochastic process .
a _ mathematica _
notebook for performing the fitting procedure is available from the author , who would welcome more sets of data .
suppose that the parameter space @xmath40 of gamma - based models is a meaningful representation of the evolutionary process and that some coordinates such as @xmath86 @xmath87 in @xmath40 represent current data .
then geodesics in @xmath40 through this point represent some kind of extremal path .
moreover , we may consider a vector field @xmath88 on @xmath40 such that @xmath86 @xmath87 is the present endpoint of an integral curve of @xmath89 the initial point of this curve being presumably in an epoch when less clustering ( @xmath90 ) , a random state ( @xmath16 ) or even dispersion ( @xmath91 ) was present at higher density .
it would be interesting to investigate the various candidate cosmologies for their appropriate vector fields , via the statistics of matter and voids they predict .
the present gamma - related parametric statistical models provide the means to convert the catalogue statistics into the coordinate parameters and a background geometrization of the statistics on which dynamical processes may be formulated .
the author wishes to thank a.p .
fairall , f. labini and m.b .
ribeiro for helpful comments during the preparation of this article .
c.t.j . dodson .
gamma manifolds and stochastic geometry . in : *
proceedings of the workshop on recent topics in differential geometry * , santiago de compostela 16 - 19 july 1997 . _ public .
geometra y topologa _ 89 ( 1998 ) 85 - 92 .
m. kerscher , j. schmalzing , j. retzlaff , s. borgani , t. buchert , s. gottlober , v. muller , m. plionis and h. wagner .
minkowski functionals of abell / aco clusters .
_ mon . not .
_ 284 , 1 ( 1997 ) 73 - 84 .
t. piran , m.lecar , d.s .
goldwirth , l. nicolaci da costa and g.r .
limits on the primordial fluctuation spectrum : void sizes and anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation . _ mon . not .
_ 265 , 3 ( 1993 ) 681 - 8 .
|
studies past ten years estimated inter - galactic void probability investigated departure from randomness basic random model from poisson process mean density @xmath0 galaxies per unit volume large box region volume @xmath1 probability finding @xmath2 galaxies @xmath3 region devoid galaxies @xmath4 probability density function for continuous random variable @xmath5 is @xmath6 approximation fails for large @xmath5 finite volume box involved hierachy @xmath7-point correlation functions clustering galaxies devised by white @xcite provided formulae continuous limit study probability sphere radius @xmath8 empty symmetrically dependent on hierarchy correlation functions white concentrated applications on galaxy distribution poisson process starting point for present approach geometrizing parameter space departures poisson process family parametric statistical models [ negexp ] ) special case successful modelling void size distributions terrestrial stochastic porous media clustering galaxies family gamma distributions has event space @xmath9 parameters @xmath10 probability density functions by @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 controls mean distribution spread shape controlled by @xmath15 coefficient of variationspecial case @xmath16 @xmath5 random poisson process @xmath17 gamma distributions model stochastic processes non - independent clumped events @xmath18 dispersed events @xmath19 random case processes possible distributions centroids extended objects galaxies distributed poisson process @xmath20 three possibilities chaotic random structure no interactions @xmath21 clustered structure mutually attractive interactions @xmath22 dispersed structure repulsive interactions @xmath23 shows family gamma distributions unit mean @xmath24 ( 300,220)(0,0 45,177)@xmath25 ( 125,160)@xmath26 ( 180,70)@xmath16 ( 310,50)@xmath27 ( 300,-7)void @xmath5 shannon s information theoretic entropy uncertainty stochastic processesjaynes @xcite given by negative expectation logarithm probability density function @xmath28 maximum entropy uncertainty at @xmath20 random case @xmath29 maximum likelihood estimates @xmath30 @xmath31 expressed mean logarithm independent observations @xmath32 estimates obtained properties @xmath33 maximizing log - likelihood function @xmath34 result @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 digamma function logarithmic derivative gamma function riemannian information metric parameter space @xmath38 given by @xmath39 see @xcite 1-dimensional subspace parametrized @xmath16 corresponds random processes path through parameter space @xmath40 gamma models determines curve @xmath41 t\mapsto ( c_1(t),c_2(t)) tangent vector @xmath42 norm @xmath43 given gammametric @xmath44 information length curve @xmath45 curve process @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 information length @xmath49 arc length difficult to evaluate contains square root sum squares derivatives use energy curve instead length for comparison between curvesenergy integrating square norm @xmath50 @xmath51 curve @xmath46 energy @xmath52 curve constant @xmath14 has @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 energy @xmath56 minimal paths joining points @xmath40 autoparallel curves geodesics @xcite defined gammametric typical sprays geodesics points @xcite gaussian curvature surface @xmath40 controls geometry geodesics @xmath57 @xmath58 large - scale structures fairall @xcite kauffmann fairall catalogue search algorithm spherical regions galaxies spectrum diameters voids peak range 8 - 11 @xmath59 long tail to 64 @xmath59 compatible extrapolation models baccigalupi et al @xcite upper bound void diameters 100 @xmath60 data kauffmann fairall simulations sahni et @xcite correlation void sizes gravitational potential void centres void topologies simplify time ghigna @xcite void statistics sensitive passage cdm to chdm models void distribution sensitive type dark matter not transfer function types chdm simulations void probability excess observations cdm simulations better vogeley et al@xcite compared void statistics with cdm simulations agreement for bright galaxies @xmath61 fainter galaxies predicted voids too empty compared data with gaussian @xmath7-body simulations at @xmath63 scales void probability for chdm larger than compared galaxy samples with perseus - pisces redshift survey void probability function between dm and cdm models former good agreement with survey little weinberg used simulations void probability insensitive to shape initial power spectrum watson rowan - robinson standard cdm predictors yield good void probability estimates voronoi foam models less lachize - rey dacosta samples insufficiently representative frequency of larger voids in southern hemisphere bernardeau gaussian derived expression for void probability function @xmath64 with @xmath65 variance of number of galaxies in volume @xmath66 distribution has extended large tail like exponential of @xmath67 than examined void probability function on scale for galaxy cluster samples general scaling up to void diameters of @xmath69@xcite used void probability function spatial statistics clusters @xmath70 agreement model cosmological constant breaking scale invariance perturbations ( 300,220)(0,0 ) 80,0 ) ( 43,160)@xmath71 300,-7)void diameter @xmath72 diameter spherical void volume @xmath73 distribution [ feq ] ) @xmath72 representation theoretical models polyhedral diameters in voronoi tesselations 300,220)(0,0 ) 50,0 ) probability density function @xmath72 given by @xmath74 mean @xmath75 variance @xmath76 coefficient variation @xmath77 @xmath72 given by @xmath78 coefficient of variation depends on @xmath79 rapid fitting data to [ dpdf ] ) numerical fitting to cvd gives @xmath80 yields estimate of @xmath14 observational mean illustration figure zcat / src data kauffmann fairall @xcite figure 8a 6.5 ) unit mean diameter true mean @xmath81 fitted values @xmath82 @xmath83 fit not good if peaks artifact fitted value @xmath84 less than @xmath85 random model data new model suggests clumping dispersion stochastic processmathematica notebook fitting procedure available from author more data parameter space @xmath40 of gamma - based models evolutionary process coordinates @xmath86 @xmath87 represent current data geodesics in @xmath40 represent extremal path consider vector field @xmath88 on @xmath40 @xmath86 @xmath87 endpoint of integral curve @xmath89 initial point epoch less clustering random state dispersion at higher density investigate candidate cosmologies for vector fields via statistics of matter voids gamma - related parametric statistical models convert catalogue statistics into coordinate parameters background geometrization dynamical processes author a.p. fairall f. labini m.b ribeiro for comments dodson gamma manifolds stochastic geometry proceedings workshop differential geometry santiago de compostela 16 - 19 july 1997 public geometra topologa _ 89 ( 1998 ) 85 - 92 kerscher schmalzing retzlaff borgani buchert gottlober muller plionis wagner minkowski functionals of abell / aco clusters 284 , 1 ( 1997 ) 73 - 84 t piran.lecar.goldwirth nicolaci costa limits primordial fluctuation spectrum void sizes anisotropy cosmic microwave radiation 265 3 1993 681 - 8
| 0.51279
| 2,982
| 1,577
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,347
|
a bicycle @xmath0-gon is an equilateral @xmath1-gon whose @xmath2 diagonals are of equal length . in this paper
we consider periodic bicycle @xmath0-paths , which are a natural variation in which the polygon is replaced with a periodic polygonal path .
|
our motivation comes from three seemingly unrelated problems .
the first is the problem of _ floating bodies of equilibrium in two dimensions_. from 1935 to 1941 , mathematicians at the university of lviv , among them stefan banach and mark kac , collected mathematical problems in a book , which became known as the scottish book , since they often met in the scottish coffee house .
stanislaw ulam posed problem 19 of this book : `` is a sphere the only solid of uniform density which will float in water in any position ? '' the answer in the two - dimensional case , as it turns out , depends on the density of the solid .
the second problem , known as the _ tire track problem _ , originated in the story , `` the adventure of the priory school '' by arthur conan doyle , where sherlock holmes and dr .
watson discuss in view of the two tire tracks of a bicycle which way the bicycle went .
the problem is : `` is it possible that tire tracks other than circles or straight lines are created by bicyclists going in both directions ? ''
as shown in figure [ fig : ambitrack ] , the answer to this subtle question is affirmative .
the third problem is the problem of describing the trajectories of _ electrons in a parabolic magnetic field_. all three problems turn out to be equivalent @xcite .
ambiguous bicycle tracks .
the rear - wheel track is the inner curve and the front - wheel track is the outer curve .
one can not tell which way the bicycle went because a bicycle could have followed either one of two trajectories @xcite .
, width=384 ] often in mathematics it is fruitful to discretize a problem . as such , s. tabachnikov proposed a `` discrete bicycle curve '' ( also known as a `` bicycle polygon '' ) @xcite , which is a polygon satisfying discrete analogs of the properties of a bicycle track .
the main requirement turns out to be that , in the language of discrete differential geometry , the polygon is `` self - darboux '' .
that is , the discrete differential geometric notion of a discrete darboux transformation @xcite , which relates one polygon to another , relates a discrete bicycle curve to itself .
the topic of bicycle curves and polygons belongs to a number of active areas of research . on the one hand , it is part of rigidity theory . as an illustration , r. connelly and b. csiks consider the problem of classifying first - order flexible regular bicycle polygons @xcite
. other work on the rigidity theory of bicycle curves and polygons can be found in @xcite .
the topic is also part of the subject of discrete integrable systems .
this point of view is taken in @xcite , where the authors find integrals of motion ( i.e. , quantities which are conserved ) of bicycle curves and polygons under the darboux transformation and recutting of polygons @xcite . in this paper , in analogy with bicycle polygons , we introduce a new concept called a periodic discrete bicycle path and study both its rigidity and integrals .
a bicycle @xmath0-gon is an equilateral @xmath1-gon whose @xmath2 diagonals are of equal length @xcite .
we consider the following analog .
[ defbikepath ] define @xmath3 ( for brevity , @xmath4 ) to be a _ discrete periodic bicycle @xmath0-path _ ( or discrete @xmath0-path ) if the following conditions hold : 1 .
@xmath5 , @xmath6 .
( periodicity condition ) 2 .
( equilateralness ) 3 .
( equality of @xmath2-diagonals ) an example of a discrete @xmath9-path.,width=384 ] definition [ defbikepath ] is meant to model the motion of a bicycle whose trajectory is spatially periodic .
if the back wheel of the bike is at @xmath10 then the front wheel is at @xmath11 , and the condition that @xmath12 is independent of @xmath13 represents the rigidity of the frame of the bike . the condition that @xmath14 is independent of @xmath13 prescribes a constant speed for the motion of the bike .
some natural questions regarding periodic @xmath0-paths are for which pairs @xmath0 they exist , how many there are and whether they are rigid or flexible .
we consider these questions in section [ sec : rig ] .
a simple example of a bicycle @xmath0-path , analogous to the regular @xmath0-polygon , is @xmath15 , i.e. when all vertices lie at equal intervals on the line .
we call this the _ regular path_. since bicycle @xmath0-paths are discretized bicycle paths , it is also interesting to see if there are any integrals of motion .
we show that this is indeed the case in section [ sec : integrals ] , by showing that area is an integral of motion .
the following two lemmas will be helpful when analyzing the rigidity of discrete bicycle paths .
[ lem : cyclic absolute values]let @xmath16 , @xmath17 for every @xmath18 and let @xmath19 then @xmath20 in particular , if @xmath1 is odd , then @xmath21 .
first note that the candidate set is well - defined since @xmath22 .
let @xmath23 . recall that @xmath24 and that @xmath25 .
set @xmath26 and @xmath27
. then @xmath28 and @xmath29 it follows that any @xmath1-tuple in @xmath30 satisfies the conditions @xmath31 , @xmath32 and @xmath33 .
the opposite inclusion is clear .
[ lem : difference equation]let @xmath35 for every @xmath36 with @xmath37 and let @xmath2 and @xmath1 be coprime integers .
assume that @xmath38 for each @xmath39 and that @xmath40 .
then @xmath41 for each @xmath39 .
define @xmath42 via @xmath43 .
the hypothesis @xmath40 implies that @xmath44 since @xmath2 and @xmath1 are coprime , the difference @xmath45 is independent of @xmath39 .
if @xmath46 is the order of @xmath2 in @xmath47 , then @xmath48 so that @xmath49 for every @xmath39 .
@xmath34 the following theorem gives a classification of a family of periodic @xmath0-paths .
[ thm : discretepath1 ] the discrete @xmath50-paths @xmath51 with @xmath52 are exactly those paths which satisfy @xmath53 and for each @xmath13
. in particular , if @xmath1 is odd then a discrete @xmath50-path must be regular . for every @xmath39 , @xmath54 and @xmath55 therefore @xmath56 and @xmath57 it follows that @xmath58 since @xmath52 , @xmath59 by lemma [ lem : difference equation ] , @xmath60 for each @xmath13 .
now equation @xmath61 for all @xmath62 implies that @xmath63 so that @xmath64 by lemma [ lem : cyclic absolute values ] , we are done .
@xmath34 [ thm : path2 ] the discrete @xmath65-paths @xmath51 with @xmath52 are exactly those paths which satisfy @xmath53 and for each @xmath13
. in particular , if @xmath1 is odd then a discrete @xmath65-path must be regular .
set @xmath66 and @xmath67
. then @xmath68 and @xmath69 substituting , we get @xmath70 so that @xmath71 is constant . by lemma [ lem : difference equation ] , @xmath41 .
it follows that @xmath72 is constant , so by lemma [ lem : difference equation ] we are done .
@xmath34 any @xmath65-path is an @xmath50-path and vice verse .
for an example , see figure [ sixfive ] .
it is important to make a distinction between infinitesimal `` trapezoidal '' movement and infinitesimal `` parallelogram '' movement of the bicycle .
informally , infinitesimal `` parallelogram '' movement can be seen as a trivial gliding of the bike , and thus we insist on infinitesimal `` trapezoidal '' movement .
( trapezoidal condition ) we will say that a discrete @xmath0-path satisfies the trapezoidal condition if @xmath73 for each @xmath74 . as an illustration of these concepts ,
consider figure [ sixfive ] : @xmath75 is a trapezoidal motion , while @xmath76 is a parallelogram motion .
consequently , the bicycle path in the figure does not satisfy the trapezoidal condition . assuming the trapezoidal condition
, we may view bicycle paths in terms of an important construction in discrete differential geometry called the darboux transformation @xcite .
( darboux transform ) we say that two polygons @xmath77 and @xmath78 are in darboux correspondence ( with parameter @xmath79 ) if each quadrilateral @xmath80 is an isosceles trapezoid with side length @xmath79 : @xmath81 two polygons in darboux correspondence . ,
width=288 ] we denote the map taking vertex @xmath82 to @xmath83 by @xmath84 .
we will also refer to the map of polygons @xmath85 by the same letter , since no confusion ought to occur .
consider a polygonal line @xmath77 with vertices @xmath86 .
let @xmath87 be a vector with its origin at @xmath88 .
having a vector @xmath89 at vertex @xmath90 , we obtain a vertex @xmath91 of the same length at @xmath92 via the trapezoidal condition .
for example , in figure [ dcorrespondence ] , @xmath93 and @xmath94 . for a fixed length of @xmath87
, we may view the map taking @xmath87 to @xmath95 as a self - map of the circle of radius @xmath96 by identifying the circle at @xmath88 with circle at @xmath97 via parallel translation .
( monodromy map of the darboux transformation ) the monodromy map is the map acting on the identified circles at @xmath88 and @xmath98 which takes @xmath87 to @xmath99 .
it is known that the monodromy map is a fractional linear transformation on a circle of fixed radius after we identify the circle with the real projective line via stereographic projection @xcite .
we will assume throughout , unless otherwise stated , that the monodromy map is acting on a fixed point .
in other words , we will assume that the darboux transform has been chosen so that the darboux vector at @xmath88 is the same as that at @xmath98 , where @xmath1 is the period .
this is analogous to applying the darboux transform to a closed polygon and requiring that its image is closed also .
+ we mention in passing that in the case of closed polygons , darboux correspondence implies that the monodromies of the two polygons are conjugated to each other .
the invariants of the conjugacy class of the monodromy , viewed as functions of the length parameter are consequently integrals of the darboux correspondence @xcite . * connection between darboux transformation and discrete @xmath0-paths*. a discrete @xmath0-path satisfying the trapezoidal condition may be interpreted in terms of the darboux transform .
indeed , given such a path , we consider the periodic equilateral linkages @xmath100 for @xmath101 .
the trapezoidal condition implies that there is a darboux correspondence @xmath102 of the same parameter ( since the @xmath0-path is equilateral ) for consecutive linkages ( see figure [ connection ] ) .
conversely , given a series of such equilateral linkages in consecutive darboux correspondence , it is easy to see that we may form a bicycle @xmath0-path satisfying the trapezoidal condition
. + viewing a discrete @xmath0-path satisfying the trapezoidal condition ( top left ) in terms of the darboux transformation .
the path is decomposed into equilateral linkages ( top right ) .
any two consecutive linkages are in darboux correspondence ( bottom).,title="fig : " ] viewing a discrete @xmath0-path satisfying the trapezoidal condition ( top left ) in terms of the darboux transformation .
the path is decomposed into equilateral linkages ( top right ) .
any two consecutive linkages are in darboux correspondence ( bottom).,title="fig : " ] viewing a discrete @xmath0-path satisfying the trapezoidal condition ( top left ) in terms of the darboux transformation .
the path is decomposed into equilateral linkages ( top right ) .
any two consecutive linkages are in darboux correspondence ( bottom ) . ]
the darboux transformation also preserves the area of periodic linkages .
more precisely , let @xmath103 for @xmath104 sufficiently large so that the linkage @xmath105 and its darboux transformation @xmath106 lie completely above @xmath103 .
we define an area function as follows .
let @xmath107 .
we define the area of @xmath77 to be the signed area of the polygon @xmath108 and denote it by @xmath109 .
we show that this area is preserved under darboux transformation ( see figure [ areafig ] ) .
in particular , it will follow that the area of @xmath110 is equal to the area of @xmath111 for every @xmath112 .
[ thm : area ] the darboux transformation is area preserving on periodic polygonal paths . two periodic paths @xmath77 and @xmath113 in darboux correspondence . by theorem [ thm : area ] , the two paths have equal areas under the curve.,title="fig:",width=384 ] two periodic paths @xmath77 and @xmath113 in darboux correspondence . by theorem [ thm :
area ] , the two paths have equal areas under the curve.,title="fig:",width=384 ] let @xmath77 and @xmath106 be two periodic polygonal paths in darboux correspondence .
we show that the difference of the areas of @xmath77 and @xmath106 is zero .
we have @xmath114 and similarly for @xmath106 . therefore @xmath115 from the isosceles trapezoids , @xmath116 also , @xmath117 similarly , @xmath118 using equation [ eq : trapezoid triangle area equality ] , @xmath119 it follows that @xmath120 which telescopes to @xmath121 since @xmath122 and @xmath123 , it follows that @xmath124 , so that @xmath125 . @xmath34
we end our discussion with some research topics and questions of interest concerning bicycle @xmath0-paths . 1 .
construct interesting families of bicycle @xmath0-paths .
for example , ones for which the condition @xmath126 does not hold .
2 . what is the @xmath127th order infinitesimal rigidity theory of bicycle @xmath0-paths like ? 3 . for closed bicycle polygons , there are many integrals of motion @xcite .
for example , a geometric center called the circumcenter of mass @xcite is invariant under darboux transformation for closed polygons .
are there other integrals of motion for bicycle @xmath0-paths ?
|
motivation from three unrelated problems first is problem of _ floating bodies of equilibrium in two dimensions from 1935 to 1941 mathematicians at university of lviv stefan banach and mark kac collected mathematical problems in book as scottish book stanislaw ulam posed problem 19 is a sphere only solid of uniform density float in water any position ? answer depends on density of solid second problem _ tire track problem _ originated in story adventure of priory school '' by arthur conan doyle sherlock two tire tracks bicycle problem possible tire tracks other than circles straight lines created by bicyclists both directions ? answer affirmative third problem describing trajectories of _ electrons in parabolic magnetic field all three problems equivalent ambiguous bicycle tracks rear - wheel track inner front - wheel track outer curve bicycle went could have followed two trajectories in mathematics problem s. tabachnikov proposed `` discrete bicycle curve '' bicycle polygon polygon satisfying discrete analogs of properties bicycle trackmain requirement in discrete differential geometry polygon is self - darboux discrete differential geometric notion darboux transformation relates one polygon to another relates discrete bicycle curve to topic of bicycle curves polygons belongs active areas research part of rigidity theory r. connelly and b. csiks consider classifying first - order flexible regular bicycle polygons other work on rigidity theory bicycle curves polygons in @xcite topic part of discrete integrable systems point view in @xcite authors find integrals of motion conserved of bicycle curves polygons under darboux transformation recutting polygons introduce new concept periodic discrete bicycle path study rigidity and integrals bicycle @xmath0-gon is equilateral @xmath1-gon @xmath2 diagonals equal length analog define @xmath3 discrete periodic bicycle @xmath0-path if conditions hold : periodicity condition equilateralness equality of @xmath2-diagonals example of discrete @xmath9-path definition model motion of bicycle trajectory spatially periodicback wheel bike at @xmath10 front at @xmath11 @xmath12 independent of @xmath13 represents rigidity frame @xmath14 independent of @xmath13 constant speed questions @xmath0-paths which pairs @xmath0 many rigid or flexible consider section [ sec : rig ] example bicycle @xmath0-path regular @xmath0-polygon @xmath15 vertices equal intervals regular path_ bicycle @xmath0-paths discretized paths integrals of motion section [ sec integrals ] area integral of motion lemmas helpful analyzing rigidity discrete bicycle paths cyclic absolute values]let @xmath16 @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath19 @xmath20 if @xmath1 odd @xmath21 candidate set well - defined since @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 set @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath1-tuple in @xmath30 satisfies conditions @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath33 opposite inclusion clear difference equation]let @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath2 @xmath1 be coprime integers@xmath38 @xmath39 @xmath40 @xmath41 @xmath39 define @xmath42 @xmath43 hypothesis @xmath40 implies @xmath44 @xmath2 coprime difference @xmath45 independent @xmath39 @xmath46 order @xmath2 @xmath47 @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath39 @xmath34 theorem classification periodic @xmath0-paths discretepath1 discrete @xmath50-paths @xmath51 @xmath52 satisfy @xmath53 each @xmath13 if @xmath1 odd discrete @xmath50-path regular @xmath39 @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 @xmath52 @xmath59 @xmath60 each @xmath13 equation @xmath61 @xmath62 implies @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath34 discrete @xmath65-paths @xmath51 @xmath52 satisfy @xmath53 each @xmath13 if @xmath1 odd discrete @xmath65-path regular set @xmath66 @xmath67 @xmath68 @xmath69 substituting @xmath70 @xmath71 constant @xmath41@xmath72 constant lemma difference equation done @xmath34 @xmath65-path @xmath50-path see figure [ sixfive distinction between infinitesimal trapezoidal parallelogram movement bicycle parallelogram movement trivial gliding bike insist on infinitesimal trapezoidal movement discrete @xmath0-path satisfies trapezoidal condition if @xmath73 each @xmath74 figure [ sixfive ] @xmath75 trapezoidal @xmath76 parallelogram motion bicycle path satisfy trapezoidal condition assuming trapezoidal condition view bicycle paths discrete differential geometry darboux transformation two polygons @xmath77 and @xmath78 in darboux correspondence parameter @xmath79 each quadrilateral @xmath80 isosceles trapezoid side length @xmath79 @xmath81 two polygons darboux correspondence map vertex @xmath82 to @xmath83 by @xmath84 refer map of polygons @xmath85 same letter no confusion consider polygonal line @xmath77 with vertices @xmath86 @xmath87 vector origin at @xmath88vector @xmath89 at vertex @xmath90 obtain vertex @xmath91 same length at @xmath92 via trapezoidal condition figure @xmath93 and @xmath94 fixed length @xmath87 view map @xmath87 to @xmath95 self - map circle radius @xmath96 identifying circle @xmath88 with @xmath97 via parallel translation monodromy map of darboux transformation acting on circles @xmath88 and @xmath98 @xmath87 to @xmath99 linear transformation on circle fixed radius circle real projective line via stereographic projection monodromy map acting on fixed point darboux transform chosen vector at @xmath88 same as @xmath98 @xmath1 period analogous applying darboux transform to closed polygon image closed closed polygons darboux correspondence implies monodromies conjugated invariants of conjugacy class monodromy functions length parameter integrals of darboux correspondence connection between darboux transformation discrete @xmath0-paths discrete @xmath0-path satisfying trapezoidal condition interpreted darboux transform consider periodic equilateral linkages @xmath100 for @xmath101trapezoidal condition implies darboux correspondence @xmath102 same parameter @xmath0-path equilateral for consecutive linkages figure series of equilateral linkages in consecutive darboux correspondence form bicycle @xmath0-path satisfying trapezoidal condition discrete @xmath0-path satisfying trapezoidal condition top left transformation decomposed into equilateral linkages right two consecutive linkages in darboux correspondence discrete @xmath0-path satisfying left decomposed into equilateral linkages right two consecutive linkages in darboux correspondence discrete @xmath0-path trapezoidal condition decomposed into equilateral linkages top right two consecutive linkages in darboux correspondence bottom darboux transformation preserves area of periodic linkages @xmath103 for @xmath104 linkage @xmath105 and darboux transformation @xmath106 lie above @xmath103 define area function area of @xmath77 signed area of polygon @xmath108 denote by @xmath109 area preserved under darboux transformation figure areafig area of @xmath110 equal to area @xmath111 for every @xmath112 darboux transformation is area preserving on periodic polygonal pathsperiodic paths @xmath77 @xmath113 darboux correspondence theorem equal areas under curve paths @xmath77 @xmath113 areas curve @xmath77 @xmath106 periodic polygonal paths darboux difference areas @xmath77 @xmath106 zero @xmath114 similarly @xmath106 @xmath115 isosceles trapezoids @xmath116 @xmath117 @xmath118 equation trapezoid triangle area equality @xmath119 follows @xmath120 telescopes to @xmath121 @xmath122 @xmath123 follows @xmath124 @xmath125 @xmath34 discussion research topics questions bicycle @xmath0-paths construct families bicycle @xmath0-paths condition @xmath126 hold @xmath127th order infinitesimal rigidity theory bicycle @xmath0-paths ? closed bicycle polygons many integrals of motion @xcite geometric center circumcenter of mass @xcite invariant under darboux transformation other integrals motion for bicycle @xmath0-paths ?
| 0.510625
| 3,465
| 1,854
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,351
|
a high - resolution @xmath0-body simulation suggests that stellar streams in the discs of barred galaxies are common and strongly time - dependent .
the velocity distribution of stars in the solar neighbourhood betray many such streams , including a stream of outward moving stars with low angular momentum .
this stream is interpreted as a signature of the galactic bar , in the sense that its stars have just enough energy ( jacobi s integral ) to cross the corotation resonance .
|
figure [ obs ] shows the observed velocity distribution in the @xmath1-@xmath2 plane , based on the hipparcos input ( radial velocities ) and output ( tangential velocities ) catalogues .
the distribution is characterised by several distinct streams , and in particular a stream with an asymmetric drift of @xmath3 kms@xmath4 and @xmath5 , which hereafter we will refer to as the `` herculis '' stream according to a comoving eggen group ( skuljan et al .
this stream most probably has a dynamical origin because its stars are mainly older than a few gyr and present a large range of metallicities ( raboud et al .
1998 ) , and is under - represented in the hipparcos sample , which is biased towards young stars .
the average luminosity of stars in this sample indeed increases with distance and the sample only covers the vertical region of the galactic plane where the fraction of young stars is largest .
we have realised a large 3d @xmath0-body simulation designed to evolve into realistic barred models of the milky way .
the initial conditions are adapted from fux ( 1997 ) and @xmath6 particles , allowing to compute very detailed velocity distributions in small space regions . after the formation of the bar ( at @xmath7 gyr ) , the simulation reveals a complex velocity structure with multiple streams occuring almost everywhere in the disc .
the streams , as well as the velocity dispersions , remain very time - dependent until the end of the simulation ( @xmath8 gyr ) , even within regions corotating with the bar .
outside corotation and for an inclination angle of the bar @xmath9 , the simulation often displays a herculis - like stream ( figure [ sim ] ) .
the model selected here is a snapshot at @xmath10 gyr , scaled to a corotation radius of @xmath11 kpc , where @xmath12 and @xmath13 are the galactocentric distances of the lagrangian points @xmath14 and @xmath15 , and to a circular velocity in the azimuthally averaged potential of @xmath16 kms@xmath4 at @xmath17 kpc . in these units , @xmath18 kpc and @xmath19 kms@xmath4 at @xmath20 and @xmath21 .
our interpretation for the herculis stream follows the same lines as in raboud et al .
( 1998 ) . in a rotating barred potential , the value of the hamiltonian : @xmath22 where @xmath23
, @xmath24 is the gravitational potential and @xmath25 the pattern speed of the bar , is an integral of motion ( jacobi s integral ) .
three critical values of this integral are associated with stars corotating at the lagrangian points ( @xmath26 and @xmath27 ) and stars on circular orbits at the outer lindblad resonance in the axisymmetriesed potential ( @xmath28 ) .
stars with @xmath29 follow `` hot '' orbits which are susceptible to cross the corotation radius . in the simulation , even far beyond the solar circle , a substantial fraction of particles
are on such orbits and the hamiltonian distribution frequently shows a secondary peak between @xmath30 and @xmath31 ( figure [ hist ] ) . if @xmath1 and @xmath2 are measured relative to the galactic centre , equation ( [ ham ] ) also writes : @xmath32 thus , neglecting the vertical velocity component @xmath33 , the contours of constant hamiltonian in the @xmath34 plane are circles centred on @xmath35 and of radius @xmath36 .
figure [ sim ] shows that the herculis - like stream in the model falls just outside the @xmath30-contour and thus concerns particles on hot orbits .
this interpretation is different from the one proposed by dehnen ( 1999 ) , who attributes the valley between the herculis stream and the hyades - pleiades branch to stars scattered off the olr . in our case , the valley is produced by the decline of the hot orbit population as @xmath38 .
but in both cases the position of the olr is found near @xmath20 , in agreement with kalnajs ( 1991 ) conclusion based on the hyades and sirius streams .
figure [ orb ] traces back in time the orbits of the particles in the herculis - like stream which were recently captured inside corotation ( using the instantaneous frozen rotating potential ) .
these particles come from the low hamiltonian edge of the stream and represent about 10% of the particles in the stream .
this percentage strongly depends on @xmath39 and @xmath40 .
dehnen w. 1999 , letters , in press ( astro - ph/9908105 ) fux r. 1997 , a&a 327 , 983 kalnajs a.j .
1991 . in : sundelius b. ( ed . )
varberg conf .
, dynamics of disc galaxies .
gteborg , p. 323
raboud d. , grenon m. , martinet l. , fux r. , udry s. 1998 , a&a 335 , l61 skuljan j. , hearnshaw j.b . ,
cottrell p.l .
1999 , 308 , 731
|
figure shows velocity distribution in @xmath1-@xmath2 plane based on hipparcos input output catalogues distribution characterised by distinct streams asymmetric drift of @xmath3@xmath4 @xmath5 `` herculis '' stream according eggen group stream dynamical origin stars older than gyr present large range metallicities under - represented in hipparcos sample biased towards young stars average luminosity increases with distance covers vertical region where fraction young stars largest realised large 3d @xmath0-body simulation into realistic barred models of milky way initial conditions adapted from fux ( 1997 ) @xmath6 particles detailed velocity distributions small space after formation bar at @xmath7 gyr ) simulation reveals complex velocity structure multiple streams in disc streams velocity dispersions remain time - dependent until end simulation ( @xmath8 gyr ) bar outside corotation inclination angle bar @xmath9 simulation displays herculis - like stream ( figuremodel snapshot at @xmath10 gyr scaled to corotation radius @xmath11 kpc @xmath12 galactocentric distances lagrangian points @xmath14 circular velocity averaged potential @xmath16 kms@xmath4 @xmath17 kpc @xmath18 kpc @xmath19 kms@xmath4 at @xmath20 @xmath21 interpretation herculis stream raboud et al . 1998 rotating barred potential hamiltonian @xmath22 pattern speed integral of motion ( jacobi s integral ) three critical values with stars corotating at lagrangian points stars on circular orbits at outer lindblad resonance potential @xmath28 ) stars with @xmath29 follow hot orbits cross corotation radius fraction particles on orbits hamiltonian distribution secondary peak between @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath1 @xmath2 measured relative to galactic centre equation writes @xmath32 contours of constant hamiltonian in @xmath34 plane circles centred on @xmath35 radius @xmath36 herculis - like stream outside @xmath30-contour concerns particles on hot orbitsinterpretation different from dehnen 1999 attributes valley between herculis stream hyades - pleiades branch to stars off olr valley produced by decline hot orbit population @xmath38 position olr near @xmath20 agreement with kalnajs 1991 conclusion hyades streams figure traces orbits particles in herculis - stream captured corotation particles from low hamiltonian edge represent 10% percentage depends on @xmath39 @xmath40 dehnen 1999 astro - ph/9908105 fux r. 1997 a&a 327 , 983 kalnajs a.j 1991 sundelius b. varberg dynamics of disc galaxies p. 323 raboud grenon martinet fux udry s. 1998 a&a 335 , l61 skuljan hearnshaw cottrell p 1999 308 , 731
| 0.184959
| 1,177
| 619
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,354
|
a genus-@xmath0 tangle @xmath1 is an arc properly embedded in a standardly embedded solid torus @xmath2 in the 3-sphere .
we say that a genus-@xmath0 tangle embeds in a knot @xmath3 if the tangle can be completed by adding an arc exterior to the solid torus to form the knot @xmath4 .
we call @xmath4 a closure of @xmath1 .
an obstruction to embedding a genus-1 tangle @xmath1 in a knot is given by torsion in the homology of branched covers of @xmath2 branched over @xmath1 .
we examine a particular example @xmath5 of a genus-1 tangle , given by krebes , and consider its two double - branched covers . using this homological obstruction
, we show that any closure of @xmath5 obtained via an arc which passes through the hole of @xmath2 an odd number of times must have determinant divisible by three .
a resulting corollary is that if @xmath5 embeds in the unknot , then the arc which completes @xmath5 to the unknot must pass through the hole of @xmath2 an even number of times .
|
in this paper , we outline a method for computing the homology of the two double - branched covers of any properly embedded arc in the solid torus . in particular , we use this method to partially answer a question posed by krebes in @xcite . let @xmath2 be a standardly embedded solid torus @xmath6 . then a genus-@xmath0 tangle is a properly embedded arc in @xmath2 .
just as we may discuss embedding ordinary tangles in @xmath7 into knots and links ( see @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) , we may consider embedding genus-1 tangles in knots .
we say that a genus-1 tangle @xmath1 embeds in a knot @xmath4 if @xmath1 can be completed by an arc exterior to @xmath2 to form the knot @xmath4 ; that is , there exists some arc in @xmath8 such that upon gluing this arc to @xmath1 along their boundary points , we have a knot in @xmath9 which is isotopic to @xmath4 .
we say that @xmath4 is a closure of @xmath1 .
let @xmath10 denote a longitude for @xmath2 which is contained in @xmath11 and avoids the genus-1 tangle .
a closure @xmath4 of @xmath1 is called odd ( respectively , even ) with respect to @xmath10 if @xmath12 is odd ( respectively , even ) . if @xmath10 is chosen to be the longitude which circles the central hole of @xmath2 as in fig .
[ krebestangle ] , and we span the longitude @xmath10 by a disk @xmath13 filling the hole , then @xmath12 is the number of transverse intersections counted with sign of the arc which completes @xmath1 to @xmath4 with @xmath13 . thus , in this case we can say more colloquially that @xmath4 is an odd ( respectively , even ) closure with respect to @xmath10 if the arc which completes @xmath1 to @xmath4 passes through the hole of @xmath2 an odd ( respectively , even ) number of times .
@xmath10 at 377 185 in @xmath2 together with a specified longitude @xmath10.,height=96 ] in @xcite , krebes asks whether the genus-1 tangle @xmath5 given in fig .
[ krebestangle ] embeds in the unknot . using the following results from @xcite , we are able to partially answer this question . note that when discussing this example , we always use the longitude @xmath10 drawn in fig .
[ krebestangle ] .
[ ruberman ] suppose @xmath14 is an orientable 3-manifold with connected boundary , and @xmath15 where @xmath16 is an orientable 3-manifold with @xmath17 torsion . then the inclusion map @xmath18 induces an injection of the torsion subgroup @xmath19 of @xmath20 into @xmath17 .
this theorem has a useful corollary which can easily be proved directly using a meyer - vietoris sequence .
[ rubermancor ] let @xmath14 and @xmath16 be as in theorem [ ruberman ] but suppose @xmath21 .
then @xmath22 is torsion - free .
one obtains an obstruction to embedding genus-1 tangles in knots from theorem [ ruberman ] by applying the result to branched covers of @xmath2 branched over genus-1 tangles . for any genus-1 tangle @xmath1 ,
the homology @xmath23 is free abelian on the two generators given by the meridian @xmath24 of @xmath1 and the longitude @xmath10 of @xmath2 . for a given @xmath25 ,
each @xmath25-fold cover of @xmath2 branched over @xmath1 is associated to a homomorphism @xmath26 which maps @xmath24 to one . the remaining generator @xmath10 of @xmath23 may be sent to any element of @xmath27 ; we use @xmath28 to index the @xmath25-fold branched covers .
so , @xmath29 denotes the @xmath25-fold cover of @xmath2 branched over @xmath1 associated to the homomorphism @xmath30 which maps @xmath10 to @xmath31 . if a genus-1 tangle @xmath1 embeds in a knot @xmath4 , then the @xmath25-fold cover @xmath32 of @xmath9 branched over @xmath4 restricts to some @xmath25-fold cover @xmath29 of @xmath2 branched over @xmath1 . in this case
, we say that the closure @xmath4 induces the cover @xmath29 .
then according to theorem [ ruberman ] , the torsion subgroup @xmath33 of @xmath34 injects into @xmath35 . note that
if @xmath4 is the unknot , then @xmath32 is @xmath9 and according to corollary [ rubermancor ] , the torsion subgroup @xmath33 is trivial .
thus , if there is any torsion in the homology of @xmath29 , then any closure of @xmath1 which induces the cover @xmath29 is not the unknot .
ruberman considered using theorem [ ruberman ] to study krebes question about the genus-1 tangle @xmath5 .
he found that
it seems that the homology of all the cyclic covers of the solid torus , branched along this arc , is torsion - free " ( see section 5 of @xcite ) .
however , our detailed computation in sections 2 and 3 shows that the two - fold branched cover @xmath36 does have torsion in its homology , and we prove the following results .
[ maintheorem ] if a knot @xmath4 in @xmath9 is an odd closure of @xmath5 , then @xmath37 is divisible by @xmath38 .
[ maincor ] if @xmath5 embeds in the unknot , then the unknot is an even closure of @xmath5 . where we perform a meridional twist , and the genus-1 tangle which results from the twist.,height=124 ] before further discussion
, we need to make a remark about the definition of genus-1 tangles .
[ embeddingremark ] note that when defining genus-1 tangles , we fix a standardly embedded solid torus @xmath2 in the 3-sphere .
the reason that we restrict to a fixed embedding is that there are many ways to re - embed a solid torus inside @xmath9 .
for instance , if we perform a meridional twist on @xmath2 along the disk indicated in fig .
[ krebestwist ] , the image of @xmath5 under this twist can be easily seen to embed in an unknot via the exterior arc pictured in fig .
[ krebestwist ] .
thus it is necessary to specify the embedding of @xmath39 in the case of genus-1 tangles , and we restrict to a fixed standardly embedded solid torus in our definition .
for the purposes of this paper , we restrict our attention to double - branched covers of @xmath2 branched over @xmath5 . since a homomorphism @xmath40 must map the specified longitude @xmath10 to either zero or one , there are two double - branched covers , @xmath41 and @xmath42 .
we call @xmath41 the even double - branched cover because it is induced by all even closures of @xmath5 ( with respect to @xmath10 ) . similarly , since @xmath42 is induced by all odd closures of @xmath5 , we call it the odd double - branched cover .
in this section , we adapt rolfsen s technique to find surgery descriptions for these double - branched covers .
following @xcite , we perform surgery near a carefully selected crossing ( see fig .
[ surgery ] ) in such a way that after surgery we may essentially unwind @xmath5 ( via sliding its endpoints around the boundary in the complement of @xmath10 ) so that it looks trivial .
this process , illustrated in fig . [ unwind ] , results in a nice surgery description of @xmath5 inside @xmath2 .
note that in the last drawing of fig .
[ unwind ] , we choose to draw this surgery description in a particular way because it makes constructing branched covers easier . to make it look trivial .
the surgery curve is always given the blackboard framing.,width=465 ] now we construct the odd cover , @xmath42 .
construction is dictated by the homomorphism @xmath40 corresponding to the cover .
if @xmath30 maps a generator of @xmath43 to a non - zero element , then we cut the solid torus along a disk transverse to that generator .
thus , we have two cuts to make in the case of the odd cover .
first , we cut @xmath2 along a disk which is transverse to the meridian @xmath24 of @xmath5 and whose boundary is made up of the unwound genus-1 tangle @xmath5 together with an arc in @xmath11 .
then , because @xmath30 sends @xmath10 to one , we cut @xmath2 along a disk which is transverse to @xmath10 and whose boundary is contained in @xmath11 .
we then take two copies of the resulting manifold and glue them together carefully to obtain a surgery description for @xmath42 .
this process is illustrated in fig .
[ constructodd ] . although it is not needed in the proof of theorem [ maintheorem ] , we also give a surgery description of the even double - branched cover @xmath41 in fig .
[ constructeven ] . of @xmath2 branched over @xmath5.,width=374 ] .,width=393 ]
now we compute the homology of the odd double - branched cover . from fig . @xmath44
we see that the surgery description for @xmath42 is given by a 2-component surgery link inside a genus-2 handlebody .
we denote the components of the surgery link by @xmath45 and @xmath46 , and let @xmath47 denote the genus-2 handlebody .
the complement of @xmath47 in @xmath9 is a neighborhood of the handcuff graph @xmath48 , pictured in fig .
[ oddhomology ] , which is composed of loops @xmath49 and @xmath50 joined together by an arc
. then the complement of @xmath51 in @xmath47 can be viewed as the complement of @xmath52 in @xmath9 .
one can see that @xmath53 is isomorphic to @xmath54 which is free on four generators : the meridians of @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath49 , and @xmath50 . completing the surgery by gluing in two solid tori according to @xmath45 and @xmath46 introduces two relations on these four generators , which are given by the linking numbers of @xmath45 and @xmath46 with each of @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath49 , and @xmath50 .
then @xmath55 is isomorphic to @xmath54 modulo these two relations , and we can get a presentation for @xmath55 using linking numbers .
thus , we have the following presentation matrix for @xmath55 : @xmath56 let @xmath4 be an odd closure of @xmath5 , and let @xmath32 denote the double cover of @xmath9 branched over @xmath4 .
since @xmath4 is an odd closure of @xmath5 , it induces a restriction from @xmath32 to @xmath42 .
then according to theorem [ ruberman ] , we have that @xmath59 .
thus @xmath60 divides @xmath61 .
we are unable to use this method to restrict all closures of @xmath5 because @xmath41 has a torsion - free first homology group .
indeed , the statement in remark [ embeddingremark ] allows us to see that the even cover does embed in @xmath9 and so must have torsion - free first homology .
of course , this can be verified by deriving a presentation for the homology of @xmath41 using the procedure above .
|
paper outline method computing homology two double - branched covers embedded arc solid torus question krebes @xcite @xmath2 standardly embedded solid torus @xmath6 genus-@xmath0 tangle embedded arc in @xmath2 embedding tangles @xmath7 into knots links consider embedding genus-1 tangles in knots genus-1 tangle @xmath1 embeds knot @xmath4 if completed by arc exterior @xmath2 knot arc in @xmath8 gluing arc to @xmath1 knot in @xmath9 isotopic to @xmath4 @xmath4 closure of @xmath1 @xmath10 longitude for @xmath2 in @xmath11 avoids genus-1 tangle closure @xmath4 of @xmath1 odd even ) @xmath10 if @xmath12 odd even @xmath10 longitude central hole @xmath2 span longitude @xmath10 by disk @xmath13 filling hole @xmath12 is number transverse intersections counted with arc @xmath1 to @xmath4 with @xmath13@xmath4 odd even closure @xmath10 if arc @xmath1 to @xmath4 passes through hole @xmath2 odd times @xmath10 at 377 185 in @xmath2 longitude @xmath10.,height=96 @xcite krebes asks genus-1 tangle @xmath5 embeds in unknot results @xcite partially answer use longitude @xmath10 fig . @xmath14 orientable 3-manifold connected boundary @xmath15 orientable 3-manifold with @xmath17 torsion inclusion map @xmath18 induces injection torsion subgroup @xmath19 of @xmath20 into @xmath17 theorem proved using meyer - vietoris sequence @xmath14 and @xmath16 theorem @xmath21 @xmath22 torsion - free obstruction to embedding genus-1 tangles in knots applying result to branched covers of @xmath2 over genus-1 tangles genus-1 tangle @xmath1 homology @xmath23 free on generators meridian @xmath24 of @xmath1 longitude @xmath10 of @xmath2@xmath25 each-fold cover @xmath2 over @xmath1 associated homomorphism @xmath26 maps @xmath24 one remaining generator @xmath10 @xmath23 sent element @xmath27 @xmath28 index @xmath25-fold covers @xmath29 denotes-fold cover @xmath2 @xmath1 homomorphism @xmath30 maps @xmath10 to @xmath31 genus-1 tangle @xmath1 embeds knot @xmath4 @xmath25-fold cover @xmath32 @xmath9 restricts @xmath25-fold cover @xmath29 @xmath2 closure @xmath4 induces cover @xmath29 torsion subgroup @xmath33 of @xmath34 injects into @xmath35 if @xmath4 unknot @xmath32 is @xmath9 torsion subgroup @xmath33 trivial torsion in homology @xmath29 closure @xmath1 induces cover @xmath29 not unknot ruberman theorem genus-1 tangle @xmath5 found homology cyclic covers solid torus torsion - free section 5 detailed computation sections 2 3 shows two - fold branched cover @xmath36 torsion in homology prove resultsmaintheorem knot @xmath4 in @xmath9 odd closure @xmath5 @xmath37 divisible by @xmath38 @xmath5 embeds in unknot unknot even closure @xmath5 meridional twist genus-1 tangle from twist remark definition genus-1 tangles fix standardly embedded solid torus @xmath2 in 3-sphere restrict fixed embedding many ways to re - embed solid torus inside @xmath9 meridional twist on @xmath2 image @xmath5 under twist embed in unknot via exterior arc necessary specify embedding of @xmath39 genus-1 tangles restrict fixed embedded solid torus definition restrict attention to double - branched covers of @xmath2 over @xmath5 homomorphism @xmath40 map longitude @xmath10 to zero or one two double - branched covers @xmath41 and @xmath42 @xmath41 even double - branched cover induced by even closures of @xmath5 @xmath42 induced by odd closures of @xmath5 odd double - branched cover adapt rolfsen s technique find surgery descriptions for double - branched covers@xcite perform surgery near crossing see fig . surgery after unwind @xmath5 sliding endpoints around boundary complement @xmath10 trivial process illustrated fig . unwind results in surgery description @xmath5 inside @xmath2 last drawing surgery constructing branched covers easier surgery curve blackboard framing construct odd cover @xmath42 construction dictated by homomorphism @xmath40 cover @xmath30 maps generator @xmath43 to non - zero element cut solid torus along disk transverse to generator two cuts odd cover cut @xmath2 along disk transverse to meridian @xmath24 of @xmath5 boundary unwound genus-1 tangle @xmath5 arc in @xmath11 @xmath30 sends @xmath10 to one cut @xmath2 along disk transverse to @xmath10 in @xmath11 two copies of resulting manifold glue together surgery description for @xmath42 process illustrated in fig . [ constructodd ] not surgery description of even double - branched cover @xmath41 in fig . constructeven @xmath2 branched over @xmath5compute homology odd double - branched cover fig . @xmath44 surgery description @xmath42 2-component surgery link genus-2 handlebody denote components @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 denote genus-2 handlebody complement @xmath47 in @xmath9 neighborhood handcuff graph @xmath48 fig . loops @xmath49 @xmath50 joined by arc complement @xmath51 in @xmath47 complement @xmath52 in @xmath9 @xmath53 isomorphic to @xmath54 free on four generators meridians @xmath45 surgery gluing two solid tori @xmath45 @xmath46 introduces two relations on four generators linking numbers @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath55 isomorphic to @xmath54 relations presentation for @xmath55 using linking numbers presentation matrix for @xmath55 : @xmath56 @xmath4 odd closure of @xmath5 @xmath32 double cover @xmath9 branched over @xmath4 induces restriction from @xmath32 to @xmath42 theorem ruberman @xmath59 @xmath60 divides @xmath61unable use method restrict closures @xmath5 @xmath41 has torsion - free first homology group statement remark embeddingremark allows even cover @xmath9 must have torsion - free first homology verified deriving presentation homology @xmath41 procedure
| 0.434501
| 2,752
| 1,500
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,357
|
this note illustrates theoretical worst - case scenarios for groundness analyses obtained through abstract interpretation over the abstract domains of _ definite _ ( @xmath0 ) and _ positive _ ( @xmath1 ) boolean functions . for @xmath0 , an example
is given for which any @xmath0-based abstract interpretation for groundness analysis follows a chain which is exponential in the number of argument positions as well as in the number of clauses but sub - exponential in the size of the program .
for @xmath1 , we strengthen a previous result by illustrating an example for which any @xmath1-based abstract interpretation for groundness analysis follows a chain which is exponential in the size of the program . it remains an open problem to determine if the worst case for @xmath0 is really as bad as that for @xmath1 .
|
boolean functions play an important role in various formal methods for specification , verification and analysis of software systems . in program analysis ,
boolean functions are often used to approximate properties of the set of states encountered at a given program point .
for example , a conjunction @xmath2 could specify that variables @xmath3 and @xmath4 satisfy some property whenever control reaches a given program point . a boolean function @xmath5 could specify that if @xmath6 is satisfied at a program point ( perhaps depending on the unknown inputs to the program ) then also @xmath7 is satisfied .
a disjunction @xmath8 could arise as a consequence of a branch in the control where @xmath6 and @xmath7 approximate properties of the ` then ` and ` else ` branches respectively . for program analysis using boolean functions , we often consider the _ positive _ boolean functions , @xmath1 .
namely , those for which @xmath9 ( denoting @xmath10 and @xmath11 by @xmath12 and @xmath13 respectively ) .
this restriction is natural as , due to the element of approximation , the result of an analysis is not a `` _ _ yes / no _ _ '' answer , but rather a `` _ _ yes / maybe not _ _ '' answer . in this case
there is no `` negative '' information .
sophisticated @xmath1-based analyzers implemented using binary decision diagrams @xcite have been shown @xcite to give good experimental results with regards to precision as well as the efficiency of the analyzers .
however , scalability is a problem and inputs ( programs ) for which the analysis requires an exponential number of iterations or exponentially large data structures are encountered @xcite . the domain
, @xmath0 , of definite boolean functions is a subdomain of @xmath1 .
these are the positive functions whose sets of models are closed under intersection .
the domain @xmath0 is less expressive than @xmath1 .
for example , the formula @xmath14 is not in @xmath0 .
however , @xmath0-based analyzers can be implemented using less complex data structures and can be faster than @xmath1-based analyzers . for goal dependent groundness analyses ( where a description of the inputs to the program being analyzed is given ) @xmath0 has been shown to provide a reasonable tradeoff between efficiency and precision @xcite .
the work described in @xcite illustrates a series of pathological inputs for @xmath1-based groundness analysis . that paper defines a predicate @xmath15 using @xmath16 clauses and illustrates that its @xmath1-based groundness analysis requires @xmath17 iterations
however , given that the size of the program ( the total number of arguments ) , is quadratic in @xmath16 ( @xmath18 ) , the number of iterations is sub - exponential in the size of the input ( @xmath17 or @xmath19 ) .
it has been suggested that @xmath0 analyses might provide better scalability properties than @xmath1 due to the restriction to functions whose models are closed under intersection .
this note makes two contributions : 1 .
it demonstrates that the worst - case behavior of a @xmath0-based analysis is ( at least ) as bad as that described in @xcite for @xmath1-based analyses ; and 2 .
it demonstrates that the worst - case behavior of a @xmath1-based analysis is exponential in the size of the input .
we have not succeeded to demonstrate a worst - case analysis for @xmath0 for which the number of iterations is exponential in the size of the input , nor to prove that @xmath0-based groundness analysis has sub - exponential worst - case behaviour .
this remains an open problem .
consider an @xmath16-ary boolean function @xmath20 .
a model @xmath21 of @xmath20 can be viewed as a sequence @xmath22 of zero s and one s such that @xmath23 . for the sake of our construction
, we order @xmath16-ary models according to their value as @xmath16-digit binary numbers .
so a model @xmath24 is smaller or equal to a model @xmath25 if and only if the binary number corresponding to @xmath24 is less or equal to the binary number corresponding to @xmath25 .
the intersection of models is defined as usual so that @xmath26 where @xmath27 if and only if @xmath28 .
let us first comment on the series of programs which demonstrates the potential worst - case behavior of a @xmath1-based groundness analysis @xcite .
the analysis of the predicate @xmath29 enumerates the models of the ( constant ) @xmath16-ary boolean function @xmath13 ( @xmath11 ) in reverse order .
starting from the initial approximation ( which has no models ) , each consecutive approximation is a function which has one new model that was not in the previous iteration .
for example , when @xmath30 , the models accumulate in the following order : @xmath31 and the @xmath1-based analysis totals 8 iterations .
in contrast the corresponding @xmath0-based analysis totals 4 iterations because at each iteration the current set of models is closed under intersection .
so for example , in the third iteration , the set @xmath32 is closed to give @xmath33 .
we now construct a series of programs which demonstrates the potential worst - case behavior of a @xmath0-based groundness analysis .
this construction is based on the following observation : [ prop1 ] let @xmath21 be an @xmath16-ary model . then the set of @xmath16-ary models smaller or equal to @xmath21 is closed under intersection .
the result follows from the following observation : if @xmath24 and @xmath25 are @xmath16-ary models , then @xmath34 is no larger than @xmath24 ( and no larger than @xmath25 ) .
this is because @xmath34 is obtained from @xmath24 ( or from @xmath25 ) by changing some one s to zero s .
a consequence of proposition [ prop1 ] is that the domain of definite boolean functions over @xmath16 variables contains a chain of length @xmath35 . to demonstrate such a chain
consider an enumeration @xmath36 of the @xmath16-ary models according to their binary ordering ( so @xmath37 and @xmath38 ) .
observe that @xmath39 is the @xmath16-ary binary representation of @xmath40 .
define a sequence @xmath41 as follows : let @xmath42 be the boolean function with the empty set of models and for @xmath43 define @xmath44 to be the boolean function whose models are @xmath45 .
> from the construction it is clear that @xmath46 forms a chain .
moreover , the elements of @xmath46 are in @xmath0 : they are positive because they have @xmath47 as a model ; and from proposition [ prop1 ] , it follows that they are closed under intersection .
the chain @xmath46 is of length @xmath48 because , for @xmath49 @xmath44 has exactly one model more than @xmath50 .
this is the setting for our construction .
the ( @xmath0-based ) groundness analysis of the following predicate `` @xmath51 '' iterates through the chain @xmath46 .
the arguments typeset in boldface highlight the case for @xmath52 .
the program size is quadratic in @xmath16 and consists of a single predicate of arity @xmath16 with @xmath53 binary clauses .
the analysis of the program can be viewed as counting from zero to @xmath54 in its arguments .
# 1 @xmath55
the @xmath0- and @xmath1-based groundness analyses of the predicate @xmath51 program in the series given in this note involve an exponential number of iterations and compute an @xmath16-ary boolean function .
the same is true for the @xmath1-based analysis of the series given in @xcite .
however , it is important to note that complexity is typically expressed in terms of the size of the input to a problem and that the size of the program defining @xmath51 in both series is quadratic in @xmath16 ( @xmath18 ) .
hence , formally speaking , we have shown that both @xmath0 and @xmath1-based groundness analyses may potentially involve a number of iterations which is @xmath19 .
this is bad enough , but sub - exponential . for @xmath1
, we can strengthen the result .
the following program is of size linear in @xmath16 ( @xmath56 ) and its @xmath1-based groundness analysis requires @xmath54 iterations .
@xmath57 \begin{array}{llcll } s(c~ , x_1 , \ldots , x_1 , & x_1 , c~ , \ldots , c~ ) .\\
s(w , a_1 , \ldots , a_{n-1 } , & w , b_1 , \ldots , b_{n-1 } ) & \leftarrow & s(a_1,\ldots , a_n , & b_1,\ldots , b_n).\\ \end{array } \end{array}\ ] ] intuitively , the @xmath58 arguments of the predicate @xmath59 represent two @xmath16-digit binary numbers ( the first is the successor of the second ) so that the @xmath16 recursive clauses from the program in section [ s2 ] can be simulated by two clauses for @xmath59 .
the base case of @xmath59 corresponds to the last recursive clause .
however , the analysis of @xmath59 does not follow an exponential chain so we still need the predicate @xmath51 to get the worst - case behaviour .
this approach does not work for @xmath0 because the result in @xmath1 for @xmath59 is not closed under intersection .
we have demonstrated a @xmath60 worst case complexity for @xmath1 and at least @xmath19 for @xmath0 ( where @xmath61 is the size of the program ) . it remains to be determined
if the worst case for @xmath0 is really as bad as that for @xmath1 or perhaps @xmath0 has better worst - case behaviour .
howe , j. m. , & king , a. ( 2000 ) . implementing groundness analysis with definite boolean functions .
smolka , g. ( ed ) , _
european symposium on programming_. lecture notes in computer science , vol .
springer - verlag .
king , andy , smaus , jan - georg , & hill , pat .
( 1999 ) . quotienting share for dependency analysis .
swierstra , doaitse ( ed ) , _
european symposium on programming_. lecture notes in computer science , vol .
springer - verlag .
|
boolean functions in methods specification verification analysis software systems in program analysis approximate properties of states encountered at program point conjunction @xmath2 variables @xmath3 and @xmath4 satisfy property whenever control reaches program point boolean function @xmath5 could if @xmath6 satisfied at program point also @xmath7 satisfied disjunction @xmath8 could of branch in control where @xmath6 @xmath7 approximate properties of then else branches for program analysis using boolean functions consider positive boolean functions , @xmath1 those for @xmath9 denoting @xmath10 @xmath11 by @xmath12 @xmath13 restriction natural due to approximation result analysis not yes / no but yes / maybe not '' answer no negative information @xmath1-based analyzers binary decision diagrams give good experimental results precision efficiency scalability problem exponential iterations or large data structures encountered domain @xmath0 of definite boolean functions subdomain of @xmath1 these positive functions models closed under intersection domain @xmath0 less expressive than @xmath1formula @xmath14 not in @xmath0 @xmath0-based analyzers less complex data structures faster than for goal dependent groundness analyses @xmath0 reasonable tradeoff between efficiency precision @xcite illustrates pathological inputs for @xmath1-based groundness analysis defines predicate @xmath15 @xmath16 clauses requires @xmath17 iterations size of program quadratic in @xmath16 ( @xmath18 number of iterations sub - exponential in size input @xmath17 or @xmath19 suggested @xmath0 analyses provide better scalability than @xmath1 due to restriction to functions models closed under intersection worst - case behavior of @xmath0-based analysis as bad as for @xmath1-based analyses exponential in size input not worst - case analysis for @xmath0 number iterations exponential in size input @xmath0-based groundness analysis sub - exponential worst - case behaviour open problem consider @xmath16-ary boolean function @xmath20 model @xmath21 of @xmath20 viewed as sequence of zero s and one s @xmath23 .order @xmath16-ary models according to value @xmath16-digit binary numbers model @xmath24 smaller or equal to @xmath25 if binary number less or equal to intersection of models @xmath26 where @xmath27 @xmath28 comment on programs potential worst - case behavior of @xmath1-based groundness analysis analysis @xmath29 enumerates models of @xmath16-ary boolean function @xmath13 ( @xmath11 ) in reverse order initial approximation each consecutive approximation one new model previous models accumulate @xmath31 @xmath1-based analysis totals 8 iterations @xmath0-based analysis totals 4 iterations each current set models closed under intersection third iteration set @xmath32 closed to @xmath33 construct series programs potential worst - case behavior of @xmath0-based groundness analysis construction based on @xmath21 be @xmath16-ary model set models smaller or equal to @xmath21 closed under intersection if @xmath24 and @xmath25 are @xmath16-ary models @xmath34 no larger than @xmath24 no @xmath25@xmath34 obtained from @xmath24 or changing s to zero consequence of proposition ] domain of boolean functions over @xmath16 variables contains chain @xmath35 enumeration @xmath36 of @xmath16-ary models binary ordering @xmath37 and @xmath39 is binary representation of @xmath40 define sequence @xmath41 @xmath42 boolean function with empty models define @xmath44 boolean function models @xmath45 @xmath46 forms chain elements of @xmath46 in @xmath0 positive @xmath47 as model closed under intersection chain @xmath46 length @xmath48 @xmath44 has one model more than @xmath50 setting for construction @xmath0-based groundness analysis of predicate @xmath51 iterates through chain @xmath46 arguments highlight case for @xmath52 program size quadratic in @xmath16 single predicate @xmath16 with @xmath53 binary clauses analysis counting from zero to @xmath54 @xmath0- and @xmath1-based groundness analyses of predicate @xmath51 program involve exponential iterations compute @xmath16-ary boolean functionsame true for @xmath1-based analysis series @xcite complexity expressed in size input problem size program defining @xmath51 series quadratic in @xmath16 ( @xmath18 ) @xmath0 and @xmath1-based groundness analyses involve iterations @xmath19 sub - exponential for @xmath1 can strengthen result program size linear in @xmath16 ( @xmath56 ) @xmath1-based groundness analysis requires @xmath54 iterations @xmath57 (c~ x_1 \ldots x_1 c~ a_1\ldots a_{n-1 b_1 \ldots b_{n-1(a_1,\ldots a_n b_1,\ldots b @xmath58 arguments of predicate @xmath59 represent two @xmath16-digit binary numbers first successor second @xmath16 recursive clauses simulated by two clauses for @xmath59 base case of @xmath59 corresponds to last recursive clause analysis @xmath59 follow exponential chain need predicate @xmath51 worst - case behaviourapproach work for @xmath0 result @xmath1 @xmath59 not closed under intersection demonstrated @xmath60 worst case complexity @xmath1 @xmath19 @xmath0 @xmath61 size program if worst case @xmath0 bad @xmath1 or better behaviour howe j m king a. 2000 implementing groundness analysis boolean functions smolka g. european symposium programming lecture notes computer science springer - verlag king andy smaus hill pat 1999 quotienting share dependency analysis swierstra doaitse european symposium programming science springer -
| 0.361965
| 2,382
| 1,266
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,381
|
we present a study of @xmath0 decay using @xmath1669 @xmath2 data , collected with the belle detector at the kekb asymmetric energy @xmath3 collider .
the data is recorded at a center of mass energy 10.58 gev .
the result for the branching ratio is : @xmath4 we also present results of the precise measurement of the branching ratio of other 3prong decay modes , @xmath5 , @xmath6 , and @xmath7 . .
|
the tau decay into 3 pseudoscalar particles has been studied since the discovery of the tau lepton .
moreover , decays to final states containing kaons provide a direct determination of the strange quark mass and cabbibo kobayashi maskawa ( ckm ) matrix element @xmath8 .
although the measurements of the @xmath0 decay from cleo used sufficiently large statistics , the overall uncertainty is as large as @xmath110% @xcite .
the resonant states in @xmath0 decay have been studied only with poor statistics by cleo @xcite .
the resonance study is itself of interest for strange spectral function measurements and leptonic violation studies .
theoretically , two intermediate resonances , the @xmath9 and @xmath10 , are both expected to contribute to tau decay into @xmath11 : @xmath12 and @xmath13 @xcite .
these are shown in [ eventshape](a ) and ( b ) , respectively . in this study , we present new measurements of the branching ratios for @xmath5 , @xmath0 , @xmath6 , and @xmath7 decays ( unless specified , the charge conjugation decay is also implied throughout this paper ) .
the measurements of these kaon containing 3prong decay modes and @xmath5 decay are correlated due to particle misidentification , so they should be treated simultaneously . in the center
of mass system , where one @xmath14 ( @xmath15 ) decays to the signal mode ( @xmath16 ) and the other @xmath14 ( @xmath17 ) decays to the pure leptonic modes ( @xmath18 or @xmath19 ) .
each figure shows one of two possible intermediate resonance states in the signal mode .
, scaledwidth=60.0% ] this study uses a huge amount of tau decays collected with the belle detector at the kekb asymmetric energy @xmath20 collider @xcite .
since 1999 , the belle experiment has accumulated approximately 850 @xmath2 data until the summer of 2008 .
the belle detector is a large - solid - angle magnetic spectrometer that consists of a silicon vertex detector ( svd ) , a 50-layer central drift chamber ( cdc ) , an array of aerogel threshold cherenkov counters ( acc ) , a barrel - like arrangement of time - of - flight scintillation counters ( tof ) , and an electromagnetic calorimeter comprised of csi(tl ) crystals located inside a super - conducting solenoid coil that provides a 1.5 t magnetic field .
an iron flux - return located outside of the coil is instrumented to detect @xmath21 mesons and to identify muons ( klm ) .
the detector is described in detail elsewhere @xcite . in this study , we used 668.9 @xmath2 data collected on the @xmath22(4s ) resonance , 10.58 gev , and 60 mev below it ( off resonance ) , which corresponds to the production of @xmath23 @xmath14pairs .
to select @xmath0 and other 3 prong decays , @xmath5 , @xmath6 and @xmath7 , first , tau pair events are selected .
we require the number of tracks to be four and the sum of charges of these tracks to be zero , when the transverse momentum of a track in the laboratory frame is greater than 0.1 gev/@xmath24 , and the track extrapolates to the interaction point within @xmath251 cm transversely and @xmath255 cm along the beam direction .
the sum of the reconstructed momenta in the center of mass ( cm ) frame is required to be less than 10 gev/@xmath24 , and the sum of energy deposited in the calorimeter is required to be less than 10 gev .
the maximum transverse momentum is required to be greater than 0.5 gev/@xmath24 , to reject two photon events which include many low transverse momentum tracks . to reject beam related background , we cut on the position of the reconstructed event vertex , requiring it to be closer to the interaction point @xmath250.5 cm transversely and @xmath253 cm along the beam direction .
the missing mass @xmath26 and in the cm frame are efficient variables for rejecting two photon and bhabha backgrounds . in the definition of missing mass , @xmath27 and @xmath28 are the four momenta of measured tracks and photons , respectively , and @xmath29 is the initial cm frame momentum of the @xmath20 beams .
we require that the missing mass should be greater than 1 gev/@xmath30 and less than 7 gev/@xmath30 , and the polar angle with respect to the beam direction in the cm frame should be greater than 30@xmath31 and less than 150@xmath31
. particle identification is performed to select tau events containing one lepton ( electron or muon ) and 3 hadrons ( pions or kaons ) .
the magnitude of thrust is evaluated and is required to be greater than 0.9 , to suppress two photon and @xmath32 backgrounds , where the thrust is defined by the maximum of @xmath33 when @xmath34 is the momentum of @xmath35th track and where @xmath36 is the unit vector in the direction of the thrust axis the direction maximizing the thrust .
also the invariant mass of charged tracks and gamma clusters for each side are required to be less than the tau mass .
finally we require that there are no , @xmath37 , and energetic @xmath38 on the signal side .
[ cutstatus ] shows the performance of the criteria used to select the 13 prong sample , the events finally selected are candidates for @xmath39 , where @xmath40 is a hadron identified as either pion or kaon . at this stage ,
the reconstruction efficiency of @xmath0 decay is @xmath41 , while the dominant background modes , @xmath42 , @xmath43 , and @xmath32 are reduced to 6.0% , 1.8% , and 0.004% , respectively .
the reconstruction efficiency of two photon background is so small ( @xmath44 % ) that it is negligible .
signal mc , solid lines show two photon background , and dotted lines show @xmath32 background
. , scaledwidth=60.0% ] one of the most important issues in this analysis is the separation of kaons and pions . in the belle experiment , @xmath45 information from the cdc , hit information of the acc , and time of flight from the tof
are used to construct the .
[ kidlikelihoodratio ] shows the likelihood ratio of kaon identification , @xmath46 , for the charged particles versus their momenta .
a clean separation between kaon and pion is observed in the whole momentum region relevant for this analysis , . as is discussed later , we choose a relatively tight particle identification ( pid ) condition for the kaon ( @xmath47 ) and a relatively loose condition for the pion . with these criteria ,
the efficiency of kaon identification is @xmath48 , and the fake rate of pion mis
identification to kaon is @xmath49 .
the calibration of the kaon and pion identification efficiencies and their fake rates are carried out by the data using the kaon and pion tracks in the @xmath50 decays , @xmath51 sample , where one knows which tracks are kaons and pions from kinematics and the charges of the tracks .
we evaluate the efficiencies and fake rates for this calibration sample and compare them to the monte carlo ( mc ) expectations . from this comparison ,
we prepare a correction table as a function of track momenta and polar angles , and apply them to the mc .
, versus the momentum of the particles .
the red filled circles and blue empty circles represent the real kaons and pions , respectively.,scaledwidth=60.0% ] this kaon identification criterion is determined by maximizing the figure of merit ( fom ) , . the figure of merit is defined as : @xmath52 .
the result of fom is shown in fig .
[ pidstudy1 ] , where one can see that the fom is maximal with the particle identification criteria used in this analysis . for the case of electron and muon identification ,
the probabilities to be an electron or muon are evaluated using the information from ecl , klm , and other particle identification detectors .
also the efficiencies and the systematic uncertainties of lepton identification are evaluated by using the control sample @xmath53 . to reduce the feed - down background which contain and @xmath37
, we reconstruct and @xmath37 signals explicitly .
is reconstructed from two charged pion tracks having invariant mass @xmath54 within @xmath2513.5 mev/@xmath30 of the mass . to improve the purity of
, the point of closest approach to the interaction point along the extrapolation of each track is required to be greater than 0.3 cm transverse to the beam direction .
the azimuthal angle between the momentum vector and the decay vertex vector of reconstructed is required to be less than 0.1 rad .
the distance between the two daughter pion tracks at their interception point is required to be less than 1.8 cm , and the flight length of transversely to the beam direction is required to be greater than 0.08 cm .
finally we required that the invariant mass of a candidate should not be located in the @xmath55 , @xmath56 , and @xmath38 mass range , with the daughter tracks assumed to be electrons or pions and protons or anti protons as appropriate .
also the @xmath37s are reconstructed from two gamma clusters .
the energy of each gamma is required to exceed 50 mev for the candidates in the barrel part of the calorimeter , and 100 mev for the candidates in the endcap part of the calorimeter .
also we applied a requirement on the invariant mass of two gammas @xmath57 to be within @xmath2516.2 mev/@xmath30 of the @xmath37 mass .
an additional selection that there should be no energetic gamma whose energy is greater than 0.3 gev , is applied to reject remaining events containing @xmath37 .
we generated @xmath15 signal mode mc data with the tauola @xcite based kkmc @xcite generator , to estimate signal efficiency .
also the detector response of all mc data sets is simulated with the geant @xcite simulator .
the tauola generator uses a decay model for @xmath0 , where the process is mediated by @xmath58 and @xmath59 resonances and their interference ( we will call this decay model as `` normal '' decay model , in the following ) . to check for a possible bias of efficiency due to the specific decay model used
, events assuming phase space decay of @xmath0 were also generated using the kkmc program .
the evaluated efficiencies for @xmath60 for both cases are compared in fig .
[ efficiencycurve ]
. the relative difference of between is around 1 % , so small that it is negligible .
decay as a function of @xmath60 .
squares and triangular points represent the normal decay , and the phase space decay , respectively.,scaledwidth=60.0% ] the average efficiencies and the of the background for all 3prong decays are summarized in table [ efficiencytable ] , where we used the normal decay model for the determination of the efficiency .
one can see that the fake rate of cross feed from @xmath5 to @xmath0 , is very small , but since the branching ratio of @xmath5 is large , there is a substantial contamination in the reconstruction of @xmath0 events coming from misidentified @xmath5 events . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^ " , ] [ branchingratio ]
we present results from the measurement of the branching ratio for the @xmath0 decay mode , as well as those for the @xmath5 , @xmath6 , and @xmath7 decay modes .
the result for the @xmath0 decay mode is compared with previous measurements in fig .
[ kpipibranchingratiohistory ] .
the statistical and systematic uncertainties are compatible with a recent precision measurement from babar , although the branching ratio of this study is more consistent with world average .
we thank the kekb group for the excellent operation of the accelerator , the kek cryogenics group for the efficient operation of the solenoid , and the kek computer group and the national institute of informatics for valuable computing and sinet3 network support .
we acknowledge support from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science , and technology of japan and the japan society for the promotion of science ; the australian research council and the australian department of education , science and training ; the national natural science foundation of china under contract no .
10575109 and 10775142 ; the department of science and technology of india ; the bk21 program of the ministry of education of korea , the chep src program and basic research program ( grant no . r01 - 2005 - 000 - 10089 - 0 ) of the korea science and engineering foundation , and the pure basic research group program of the korea research foundation ; the polish state committee for scientific research ; the ministry of education and science of the russian federation and the russian federal agency for atomic energy ; the slovenian research agency ; the swiss national science foundation ; the national science council and the ministry of education of taiwan ; and the u.s.department of energy .
99 e. gmiz , _ et al .
. lett . * 94 * , 011803 ( 2005 ) .
r. barate , _ et al .
_ , eur . phys .
j. c * 4 * , 29 ( 1998 ) .
g. abbiendi , _ et al .
j. c * 35 * , 437 ( 2004 ) .
r. a. briere , _
et al . _ , phys . rev .
* 90 * , 181802 ( 2003 ) .
b. aubert , _ et al .
lett . * 100 * , 011801 ( 2008 ) .
d. m. asner , _ et al .
d * 62 * , 072006 ( 2000 ) .
m. finkemeier and e. mirkes , z. phys .
c * 69 * , 243 ( 1996 ) .
s. kurokawa and e. kikutani , nucl .
instr . and .
a499 , 1 ( 2003 ) , and other papers included in this volume .
a. abashian _ et al . _
( belle collab . ) , nucl .
instr . and meth . a * 479 * , 117 ( 2002 ) .
r. brun _ et al .
_ , geant 3.21 , cern report dd / ee/84 - 1 , ( 1984 ) .
d. epifanov _ et al . _
( belle collab . ) , phys .
b * 654 * , 65 ( 2007 ) .
s. banerjee , b. pietrzyk , j. m. roney and z. was , phys .
d * 77 * , 054012 ( 2008 ) .
|
tau decay into 3 pseudoscalar particles studied since discovery tau lepton decays to final states kaons strange quark mass kobayashi matrix element @xmath8 measurements @xmath0 decay from cleo large statistics uncertainty large as @xmath110% @xcite resonant states in @xmath0 decay studied with poor statistics by cleo @xcite resonance study for strange spectral function leptonic violation studies intermediate resonances @xmath9 @xmath10 contribute to tau decay into @xmath11 @xcite shown in(a b new measurements branching ratios for @xmath5 @xmath0 @xmath7 decays charge conjugation decay implied measurements kaon 3prong decay modes @xmath5 decay correlated due to particle misidentification treated simultaneously mass system @xmath14 decays to signal mode other pure leptonic modes each figure shows intermediate resonance states in signal mode study uses tau decays collected with belle detector at kekb asymmetric energy @xmath20 collider @xcite1999 belle experiment accumulated 850 @xmath2 data until 2008 belle detector large - solid - angle magnetic spectrometer silicon vertex detector 50-layer central drift chamber aerogel threshold cherenkov counters time - of - flight scintillation counters electromagnetic calorimeter csi(tl ) crystals super - conducting solenoid coil 1.5 t magnetic field iron flux - return outside @xmath21 mesons muons detector described used 668.9 @xmath2 data on @xmath22(4s ) resonance 10.58 gev 60 mev below production @xmath23 @xmath14pairs select @xmath0 3 prong decays @xmath5 @xmath7 tau pair events tracks four sum charges zero transverse momentum greater than 0.1 gev/@xmath24 track extrapolates to interaction point within @xmath251 cm @xmath255 cm reconstructed momenta in center of mass frame less than 10 gev/@xmath24 energy deposited in calorimeter less than 10 gev maximum transverse momentum greater than 0.5 gev/@xmath24 reject two photon events low transverse momentum tracksreject beam background cut position reconstructed event vertex closer to interaction point @xmath250.5 cm transversely @xmath253 cm beam direction missing mass @xmath26 cm frame rejecting photon bhabha backgrounds @xmath27 @xmath28 four momenta tracks photons @xmath29 initial cm frame momentum @xmath20 beams missing mass greater than 1 gev/@xmath30 less than 7 gev/@xmath30 polar angle beam direction greater than 30@xmath31 less than 150@xmath31 particle identification tau events one lepton 3 hadrons magnitude thrust greater than 0.9 suppress two photon @xmath32 backgrounds thrust defined by maximum @xmath33 @xmath34 momentum @xmath35th track @xmath36 unit vector direction thrust axis invariant mass of charged tracks gamma clusters less than tau mass no @xmath37 energetic @xmath38 on signal side cutstatus shows performance criteria 13 prong sample events selected candidates for @xmath39 @xmath40 hadron pion or kaonreconstruction efficiency of @xmath0 decay is @xmath41 dominant background modes @xmath42 @xmath32 reduced to 6.0% 1.8% 0.004% reconstruction efficiency of two photon background small ( @xmath44 % ) negligible solid lines show two photon background dotted lines show @xmath32 background scaledwidth=60.0% important separation of kaons pions belle experiment @xmath45 information cdc hit information acc time of flight tof used construct kidlikelihoodratio shows likelihood ratio kaon identification @xmath46 for charged particles versus momenta clean separation between kaon pion in momentum region tight particle identification condition for kaon @xmath47 loose condition for pion efficiency of kaon identification is @xmath48 fake rate of pion mis identification @xmath49 calibration of kaon pion identification efficiencies fake rates data kaon pion tracks @xmath50 decays @xmath51 sample evaluate efficiencies fake rates compare to monte carlo mc ) expectations prepare correction table track momenta polar angles apply to mc versus momentum particlesred filled blue empty circles represent kaons pions=60.0% kaon identification criterion determined maximizing figure of merit fom defined as @xmath52 result shown in fig . fom maximal with particle identification criteria electron muon identification probabilities electron muon evaluated from ecl klm particle identification detectors efficiencies systematic uncertainties of lepton identification evaluated control sample @xmath53 reduce feed - down background reconstruct signals reconstructed from two charged pion tracks invariant mass @xmath54 @xmath2513.5 mev/@xmath30 point closest approach to interaction point greater than 0.3 cm transverse beam azimuthal angle between momentum vector decay vertex vector less than 0.1 rad distance between two daughter pion tracks at interception point less than 1.8 cm flight length beam greater than 0.08 cm invariant mass not in @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath38 mass range daughter tracks assumed be electrons or pions protons or anti protons @xmath37s reconstructed from two gamma clustersenergy each gamma exceed 50 mev barrel 100 mev endcap part applied requirement invariant mass two gammas @xmath57 within @xmath2516.2 mev/@xmath30 @xmath37 mass additional selection no energetic gamma greater than 0.3 gev reject events @xmath37 generated @xmath15 signal mode mc data tauola @xcite kkmc generator estimate signal efficiency detector response mc data simulated geant @xcite simulator tauola generator uses decay model @xmath0 mediated by @xmath58 @xmath59 resonances interference normal '' decay model check bias efficiency decay model events phase space decay @xmath0 generated kkmc program evaluated efficiencies @xmath60 compared in fig . efficiencycurve relative difference around 1 % small negligible decay function @xmath60 triangular points represent normal decay phase space decay average efficiencies background all 3prong decays summarized in table efficiencytable ] used normal decay model determination efficiencyfake rate cross feed from @xmath5 to @xmath0 small branching ratio @xmath5 large substantial contamination in reconstruction @xmath0 events from misidentified @xmath5 events branchingratio results branching ratio @xmath0 decay mode @xmath5 @xmath7 decay modes result @xmath0 compared with previous measurements in fig . statistical systematic uncertainties compatible with recent precision measurement from babar branching ratio consistent with world average thank kekb group kek cryogenics group solenoid kek computer group national institute of informatics for computing network support acknowledge support from ministry of education culture sports science technology japan japan society for promotion science australian research council department of education science training national natural science foundation china department of science technology of india bk21 program ministry education korea chep src program basic research program korea science engineering foundation basic research group program polish state committee for scientific research ministry of education science russian federation russian federal agency for atomic energy slovenian research agency swiss national science foundation national science council ministry of education of taiwan u.s.department of energygmiz et al lett 94 * 011803 ( 2005 ) barate al phys . j c 4 * 29 ( 1998 ) abbiendi 35 437 ( 2004 ) briere phys . rev 90 * 181802 ( 2003 ) aubert 100 * 011801 ( 2008 ) asner 62 * 072006 ( 2000 ) finkemeier mirkes . c 69 * 243 ( 1996 ) kurokawa kikutani nucl. instr . a499 , 1 ( 2003 ) other papers volume abashian al nucl . instr . 479 * 117 ( 2002 ) brun al geant 3.21 cern report/84 - 1 1984 ) epifanov phys . b * 654 * 65 ( 2007 ) banerjee pietrzyk roney z was phys . d * 77 * 054012 ( 2008 )
| 0.51403
| 3,388
| 1,726
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,383
|
charmless 3-body decays of @xmath0 mesons are studied in a simple model based on the factorization approach .
we have identified two distinct sources of nonresonant contributions : a small contribution from the tree transition and a large source of the nonresonant signal in the matrix elements of scalar densities , e.g. , @xmath1 , induced from the penguin transition .
this explains the dominance of the nonresonant background in @xmath2 decays , the sizable nonresonant fraction in @xmath3 and @xmath4 modes and the smallness of nonresonant rates in @xmath5 decays .
the seemingly huge discrepancy between babar and belle for the nonresonant contribution in the decay @xmath6 is now relieved .
we have computed the resonant and nonresonant contributions to charmless 3-body decays and determined the rates for the quasi - two - body decays @xmath7 and @xmath8 .
time - dependent @xmath9 asymmetries @xmath10 and @xmath11 in @xmath12 and @xmath13 modes are estimated .
|
recently many three - body @xmath0 decay modes , for example , @xmath14 , @xmath15 , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19 and @xmath20 , have been observed at @xmath0 factories with branching ratios of order @xmath21 .
the dalitz plot analysis of 3-body @xmath0 decays provides a nice methodology for extracting information on the unitarity triangle in the standard model .
the three - body meson decays are generally dominated by intermediate vector and scalar resonances , namely , they proceed via quasi - two - body decays containing a resonance state and a pseudoscalar meson .
indeed , most of the quasi - two @xmath0 decays are extracted from the analysis of three - body @xmath0 decays using the dalitz plot technique .
three - body hadronic @xmath0 decays involving a vector meson or charmed meson also have been observed at @xmath0 factories . in this talk
i ll focus on charmless 3-body @xmath0 decays .
experimentally , there are two striking features for 3-body hadronic @xmath0 decays : @lcc@ decay & babar & belle + @xmath22 & @xmath23 & @xmath24 + @xmath25 & @xmath26 & + @xmath27 & & @xmath28 + @xmath6 & @xmath29 & @xmath30 + @xmath31 & @xmath32 & @xmath33 + @xmath34 & @xmath35 & + [ tab : brexpt ] 0.2 cm ( i ) large noresonant fractions in peguin - dominated modes 0.2 cm it is known that the nonresonant signal in charm decays is small , less than 10% @xcite . in the past few years , some of the charmless @xmath0 to 3-body decay modes
have been measured at @xmath0 factories and studied using the dalitz plot analysis .
we see from table [ tab : brexpt ] that the nonresonant fraction is about @xmath36 90% in @xmath2 decays , @xmath37 in @xmath38 decays ( smaller in the @xmath39 decay ) , and @xmath36 14% in the @xmath40 decay .
hence , the nonresonant 3-body decays play an essential role in penguin - dominated @xmath0 decays .
while this is a surprise in view of the rather small nonresonant contributions in 3-body charm decays , it is not entirely unexpected because the energy release scale in weak @xmath0 decays is of order 5 gev , whereas the major resonances lie in the energy region of 0.77 to 1.6 gev . consequently , it is likely that 3-body @xmath0 decays may receive sizable nonresonant contributions .
it is important to understand and identify the underlying mechanism for nonresonant decays .
nonresonant amplitudes in charm decays are usually assumed to be uniform in phase space .
however , this is no longer true in @xmath0 decays due to the large energy release in weak @xmath0 decays . while both babar and belle have adopted the parametrization @xmath41 to describe the non - resonant @xmath2 amplitudes , they differ in the analysis of the nonresonant component in @xmath38 decays .
belle still employed the above exponential parametrization to analyze the nonresonant contribution , but babar used the lass parametrization to describe the @xmath42 @xmath43-wave and the nonresonant component by a single amplitude suggested by the lass collaboration to describe the scalar amplitude in elastic @xmath42 scattering . since the babar and belle definitions of the @xmath44 and nonresonant differ , the branching fractions and phases are not directly comparable
. we will come this point more in sec .
experimentally , it is hard to measure the direct 3-body decays as the interference between nonresonant and quasi - two - body amplitudes makes it difficult to disentangle these two distinct contributions and extract the nonresonant one .
0.2 cm ( ii ) new broad scalar resonances @xmath45 and @xmath46 0.2 cm a broad scalar resonance @xmath47 ( or @xmath48 denoted by babar ) has been seen in @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 decays at energies around 1.5 gev .
however , it can not be identified with the well known scaler meson @xmath52 .
this is because @xmath52 decays into @xmath53 about five times more frequently than to @xmath54 .
identification of @xmath47 with @xmath52 will imply that the @xmath54 peak at 1.5 gev will be accompanied by a peak in @xmath53 , which is not seen experimentally .
hence , the nature of @xmath47 is not clear .
moreover , there exists a production puzzle for @xmath47 . both babar and belle
have seen a large fraction from @xmath47 in the decay @xmath22 : @xmath55 by babar @xcite and @xmath56 by belle @xcite , whereas it is only about 4% seen by babar in @xmath57 @xcite .
the puzzle is that why @xmath47 behaves so dramatically different in charged and neutral @xmath0 decays to 3 kaons .
it is not clear whether the large production of @xmath47 is a genuine effect or just a statistical fluctuation .
anyway , this issue should be clarified soon .
notice that belle actually found two solutions for the fraction of @xmath58 in @xmath59 @xcite : @xmath56 and @xmath60 .
the first solution is preferred by belle .
it is probably worth of re - examining the small solution .
in analog to two - body decays of heavy mesons which can be analyzed using the model - independent quark diagrammatic approach , three - body decays of the heavy mesons can be expressed in terms of some quark - graph amplitudes @xcite ( see fig . [ qd ] ) : @xmath61 and @xmath62 , the color - allowed external @xmath63-emission tree diagrams ; @xmath64 and @xmath65 , the color - suppressed internal @xmath63-emission diagrams ; @xmath66 , the @xmath63-exchange diagram ; @xmath67 , the @xmath63-annihilation diagram ; @xmath68 and @xmath69 , the penguin diagrams , and @xmath70 , the penguin - induced annihilation diagram .
the quark - graph amplitudes of various 3-body @xmath0 decays @xmath71 and @xmath72 are summarized in table i of @xcite . as mentioned in @xcite , the use of the quark - diagram amplitudes for three - body decays are in general momentum dependent .
this means that unless its momentum dependence is known , the quark - diagram amplitudes of direct 3-body decays can not be extracted from experiment without making further assumptions .
moreover , the momentum dependence of each quark - diagram amplitude varies from channel to channel . denotes a heavy quark.,width=215 ]
we take the decay @xmath25 as an illustration . under the factorization approach ,
its decay amplitude consists of three distinct factorizable terms : ( i ) the transition process induced by @xmath73 penguins , @xmath74 , ( ii ) the current - induced process through the tree @xmath75 transition , @xmath76 , and ( iii ) the annihilation process @xmath77 , where @xmath78 denotes a @xmath79 transition matrix element . for the transition process , the general expression of the nonresonant contribution has the form @xmath80 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath81 . in principle
, one can apply heavy meson chiral perturbation theory ( hmchpt ) to evaluate the form factors @xmath82 and @xmath83 ( for previous studies , see @xcite ) .
however , this will lead to too large decay rates in disagreement with experiment @xcite .
a direct calculation indicates that the branching ratio of @xmath25 arising from the transition process alone is already at the level of @xmath84 which exceeds the measured total branching ratio @xcite of @xmath85 .
the issue has to do with the applicability of hmchpt . in order to apply this approach , two of the final - state pseudoscalars (
@xmath86 and @xmath87 in this example ) have to be soft .
the momentum of the soft pseudoscalar should be smaller than the chiral symmetry breaking scale @xmath88 of order @xmath89 gev .
for 3-body charmless @xmath0 decays , the available phase space where chiral perturbation theory is applicable is only a small fraction of the whole dalitz plot .
therefore , it is not justified to apply chiral and heavy quark symmetries to a certain kinematic region and then generalize it to the region beyond its validity . if the soft meson result is assumed to be the same in the whole dalitz plot , the decay rate will be greatly overestimated .
recently we have proposed to parametrize the @xmath75 trasnition - induced nonresonant amplitude given by eq .
( [ eq : ahmchpt ] ) as @xcite @xmath90 so that the hmchpt results are recovered in the chiral limit @xmath91 .
that is , the nonresonant amplitude in the soft meson region is described by hmchpt , but its energy dependence beyond the chiral limit is governed by the exponential term @xmath92 .
the unknown parameter @xmath93 can be determined from the data of the tree - dominated decay @xmath34 .
in addition to the @xmath75 tree transition , we need to consider the nonresonant contributions to the @xmath73 penguin amplitude @xmath94 the 2-kaon creation matrix elements can be expressed in terms of time - like kaon current form factors as @xmath95 the weak vector form factors @xmath96 and @xmath97 can be related to the kaon electromagnetic ( e.m . )
form factors @xmath98 and @xmath99 for the charged and neutral kaons , respectively .
phenomenologically , the e.m .
form factors receive resonant and nonresonant contributions @xmath100 the resonant and nonresonant terms in eq .
( [ eq : kkemff ] ) can be determined from a fit to the kaon e.m .
the non - resonant contribution to the matrix element @xmath101 is given by @xmath102 the nonresonant @xmath103 term is introduced for the following reason . although the nonresonant contributions to @xmath104 and @xmath105 are related through the equation of motion , the resonant ones are different and not related _ a priori_. as stressed in @xcite , to apply the equation of motion , the form factors should be away from the resonant region . in the presence of the resonances , we thus need to introduce a nonresonant @xmath103 term which can be constrained by the measured @xmath106 rate and the @xmath54 mass spectrum @xcite .
vector meson and scalar resonances contribute to the two - body matrix elements @xmath107 and @xmath108 , respectively .
they can also contribute to the three - body matrix element @xmath109 .
resonant effects are described in terms of the usual breit - wigner formalism .
more precisely , @xmath110 where @xmath111 and @xmath112 . in this manner we are able to figure out the relevant resonances which contribute to the 3-body decays of interest and compute the rates of @xmath7 and @xmath8 .
[ cols= " < , < , < , < " , ] [ tab : cp ] the deviation of the mixing - induced @xmath9 asymmetry in @xmath113 , @xmath114 , @xmath115 and @xmath13 from that measured in @xmath116 , i.e. @xmath117 @xcite , namely , @xmath118 , is shown in table [ tab : cp ] .
our calculation indicates the deviation of the mixing - induced @xmath9 asymmetry in @xmath119 from that measured in @xmath120 is very similar to that of the @xmath114 mode as the tree pollution effect in the former is somewhat washed out .
nevertheless , direct @xmath9 asymmetry of the former , being of order @xmath121 , is more prominent than the latter .
it is important to account for the large nonresonant amplitudes in the study of charmless 3-body baryonic @xmath0 decays .
we have identified two distinct sources of nonresonant contributions : a small contribution from the tree transition and a large source of the nonresonant signal in the matrix elements of scalar densities , e.g. @xmath1 , induced from the penguin transition .
this explains the dominance of the nonresonant background in @xmath2 decays , the sizable nonresonant fraction in @xmath3 and @xmath4 modes and the smallness of nonresonant rates in @xmath5 decays .
the seemingly huge discrepancy between babar and belle for the nonresonant contribution in the decay @xmath6 is now relieved . since penguin contributions to charm decays
are gim suppressed , hence nonresonant signals in @xmath122 decays are always small . we have computed the resonant and nonresonant contributions to charmless 3-body decays and determined the rates for the quasi - two - body decays @xmath7 and @xmath8 .
time - dependent @xmath9 asymmetries @xmath10 and @xmath11 in @xmath12 and @xmath13 modes are estimated .
since we have a realistic model for resonant and nonresonant contributions , our estimation of @xmath10 for 3-body @xmath0 decays should be more reliable and trustworthy .
i m grateful to chun - khiang chua and amarjit soni for fruitful collaboration , to tim gershon and jim smith for discussions and to paoti chang and hsiang - nan li for organizing this stimulating conference .
|
three - body @xmath0 decay modes observed at @xmath0 factories with branching ratios @xmath21 dalitz plot analysis of 3-body @xmath0 decays provides methodology for extracting information on unitarity triangle three - body meson decays dominated by intermediate vector scalar resonances proceed via quasi - two - body decays containing resonance state pseudoscalar meson quasi - two @xmath0 decays extracted from using dalitz plot technique three - body hadronic @xmath0 decays vector meson or charmed meson observed at @xmath0 factories focus on charmless 3-body @xmath0 decays two striking features for 3-body hadronic @xmath0 decays : decay + @xmath22 0.2 large noresonant fractions in peguin - dominated modes 0.2 cm nonresonant signal in charm decays small less than 10% charmless @xmath0 to 3-body decay modes measured at @xmath0 factories studied using dalitz plot analysistable nonresonant fraction @xmath36 90% @xmath2 decays @xmath37 @xmath38 decays smaller @xmath36 14% @xmath40 decay nonresonant 3-body decays essential penguin - dominated @xmath0 decays small nonresonant contributions 3-body charm decays not energy release scale weak @xmath0 decays 5 gev major resonances 0.77 to 1.6 gev likely 3-body @xmath0 decays receive sizable nonresonant contributions important understand underlying mechanism nonresonant decays nonresonant amplitudes charm decays uniform phase space no true @xmath0 decays large energy release weak decays babar belle adopted parametrization @xmath41 non - resonant @xmath2 amplitudes differ analysis nonresonant component @xmath38 decays belle employed exponential parametrization nonresonant babar used lass parametrization @xmath42 @xmath43-wave nonresonant component single amplitude @xmath42 scattering babar belle definitions @xmath44 nonresonant differ branching fractions phases not comparablehard to measure direct 3-body decays interference between nonresonant quasi - two - body amplitudes nonresonant 0.2 cm new broad scalar resonances @xmath45 @xmath46 @xmath47 seen in @xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 decays at energies around 1.5 gev identified with meson @xmath52 @xmath52 decays into @xmath53 five times more frequently than @xmath54 identification with @xmath52 @xmath54 peak at 1.5 gev by peak in @xmath53 not seen nature of @xmath47 not clear production puzzle for @xmath47 large fraction from @xmath47 in decay @xmath55 about 4% seen by babar in @xmath57 puzzle why @xmath47 behaves different in charged neutral @xmath0 decays to 3 kaons large production of @xmath47 genuine effect or statistical fluctuation should belle found two solutions for fraction of @xmath58 in @xmath59 first solution preferred by belle re - examining solutionanalog to two - body decays heavy mesons analyzed model - independent quark diagrammatic approach three - body decays expressed quark - amplitudes fig . @xmath61 @xmath62 color - allowed external-emission tree diagrams @xmath64 color - suppressed internal diagrams @xmath66-exchange-annihilation diagram penguin diagrams penguin - induced annihilation diagram quark - amplitudes 3-body @xmath0 decays @xmath71 @xmath72 summarized in table i quark - diagram amplitudes three - body decays momentum dependent unless momentum dependence known - amplitudes direct 3-body decays not extracted from experiment without assumptions momentum dependence varies channel to channel heavy quark decay @xmath25 illustration factorization approach decay amplitude consists three factorizable terms transition process induced @xmath73 penguins current - induced process tree @xmath75 transition annihilation process @xmath77 @xmath78 denotes @xmath79 transition matrix elementtransition process nonresonant contribution form @xmath80 where @xmath81 apply heavy meson chiral perturbation theory evaluate form factors @xmath82 @xmath83 @xcite to large decay rates experiment @xcite branching ratio @xmath25 transition process level @xmath84 exceeds total branching ratio @xmath85 issue applicability hmchpt two final - state pseudoscalars @xmath86 @xmath87 soft momentum soft pseudoscalar smaller than chiral symmetry breaking scale @xmath88 @xmath89 3-body charmless @xmath0 decays phase space chiral perturbation theory small fraction of dalitz plot not justified to apply chiral heavy quark symmetries to kinematic region generalize region beyond validity if soft meson result same whole dalitz plot decay rate overestimated proposed to parametrize @xmath75 trasnition - induced nonresonant amplitude as @xcite @xmath90 hmchpt results recovered in chiral limit @xmath91 nonresonant amplitude in soft meson region described by hmchpt energy dependence beyond chiral limit governed by exponential term @xmath92unknown parameter @xmath93 determined from data tree - decay @xmath34 @xmath75 tree transition consider nonresonant contributions @xmath73 penguin amplitude @xmath94 2-kaon creation matrix elements expressed time - form factors weak vector form factors @xmath96 related to electromagnetic form factors @xmath98 @xmath99 charged neutral kaons form factors receive resonant nonresonant contributions @xmath100 resonant nonresonant terms determined from kaon e.m non - resonant contribution matrix element @xmath101 @xmath102 nonresonant @xmath103 term introduced nonresonant contributions @xmath104 @xmath105 related equation motion resonant different not related form factors away from resonant region introduce nonresonant @xmath103 term constrained by measured @xmath106 rate @xmath54 mass spectrum vector scalar resonances contribute to two - body matrix elements @xmath107 @xmath108 three - body matrix element @xmath109 resonant effects described breit - wigner formalism @xmath110 @xmath111figure out resonances 3-body decays compute rates of @xmath7 @xmath8 tab deviation mixing - induced @xmath9 asymmetry in @xmath113 from @xmath116 @xmath117 shown in table calculation indicates deviation @xmath9 asymmetry @xmath119 from @xmath120 similar to @xmath114 mode tree pollution effect washed out @xmath9 asymmetry former @xmath121 more prominent account for large nonresonant amplitudes in charmless 3-body baryonic @xmath0 decays identified two sources of nonresonant contributions small from tree transition large source nonresonant signal in matrix elements scalar densities penguin transition explains dominance nonresonant background in @xmath2 decays sizable nonresonant fraction in @xmath3 @xmath4 modes smallness nonresonant rates in @xmath5 decays discrepancy between babar belle for nonresonant contribution in decay @xmath6 relieved penguin contributions to charm decays suppressed nonresonant signals in @xmath122 decays smallcomputed resonant nonresonant contributions 3-body decays determined rates quasi - two - body decays @xmath7 time - dependent @xmath9 asymmetries modes estimated realistic model estimation @xmath10 3-body @xmath0 decays reliable trustworthy grateful chun - khiang chua amarjit soni tim gershon jim smith paoti chang hsiang - nan li conference
| 0.499895
| 3,187
| 1,674
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,384
|
the dipping low - mass x - ray binary 4u 1915 - 05 was observed by suzaku on 2007 november 8 for a net exposure of 39 ksec .
it was detected by the xis with a 0.8 - 10 kev signal rate of @xmath0 cts s@xmath1 per camera , and hxd - pin with a 12 - 45 kev signal rate of @xmath2 cts s@xmath1 .
after removing the periodic dips and an x - ray burst , the 0.8 45 kev continuum was successfully described by an optically thick disk emission with an inner - disk temperature @xmath3 kev and a neutron - star blackbody emission with a temperature @xmath4 kev , on condition that the blackbody component , or possibly the disk emission too , is significantly comptonized .
this successful modeling is consistent with 4u 1915 - 05 being in a high - soft state in this observation , and implies that its broadband spectrum can be interpreted in the same scheme as for many non - dipping low - mass x - ray binaries in the soft state .
its bolometric luminosity ( @xmath5 0.02 times the eddington limit ) is relatively low for the soft state , but within a tolerance , if considering the distance and inclination uncertainties .
as a high - inclination binary , this source exhibited stronger comptonization effect , with a larger comptonizing @xmath6-parameter , compared to low and medium inclination binaries .
this suggests that the comptonizing coronae of these objects in the soft state is in an oblate ( rather than spherical ) shape , extending along the accretion disk plane , because the @xmath6-parameter would not depend on the inclination if the corona were spherical .
|
a neutron - star low - mass x - ray binary ( ns - lmxb , or hereafter simply lmxb ) consists of a mass accreting neutron star ( ns ) and a mass - donating low - mass star which fills the binary roche lobe .
it is well known that these objects show bimodality in x - ray spectral states , namely soft and hard states ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ) . in the soft state when the mass accretion rate is high ,
mass from the companion spirals onto the ns through a standard accretion disk @xcite which is optically thick and geometrically thin .
the spectrum is soft , which we can describe by the canonical model of @xcite : a disk blackbody with a temperature of @xmath51 kev , plus a blackbody from the ns surface with a temperature of @xmath5 2 kev .
the latter component is often found to be weakly comptonized ( e.g. , * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
over the past three decades , this model has been reinforced by a number of studies including , e.g. , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite .
when the accretion rate is low and the source is in the hard state , the inner accretion disk transites into an optically thin and geometrically thick flow around the ns , which is further characterized by a large radial velocity component , a nearly free - fall ion temperature , and possibly a significant difference between the ion and electron temperatures .
the hot electrons therein strongly comptonize the ns blackbody emission and harden the spectrum to @xmath7 100 kev @xcite .
in contrast to these normal " objects , a special kind of lmxbs with high inclination angles , namely dipping lmxbs ( also called dippers ) showing periodic dips in their x - ray intensity , seldom have their spectral states investigated . for a long time , their dips were thought to be caused by progressive covering of a largely extended scattering region called accretion disk corona ( adc , * ? ? ? * ) by the companion star ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) .
however , new studies revealed that the dips can be explained simply by obscuration of the central compact x - ray source by an ionized and extended absorber located at some outer parts of the accretion disk @xcite , and the adc is no longer required .
based on the new scenario , it is reasonable to consider dipping lmxbs essentially the same objects as non - dipping lmxbs , except for their higher inclinations .
hence it is worthwhile to examine whether we can understand dippers in the same spectral classification scheme as for non - dipping lmxbs , possibly with some modifications .
so far , broad - band spectra of dipping lmxbs were studied extensively , e.g. , with bepposax .
examples include relatively luminous dippers 4u 1915 - 05 @xcite , xb 1254 - 690 @xcite and xb 1658 - 298 @xcite , as well as dimmer ones such as xb 1323 - 619 @xcite and exo 0748 - 676 @xcite .
the reported spectra are generally rather hard , often extending to @xmath5 100 kev , which are reminiscent of the hard state of non - dipping lmxbs .
however , these previous works did not clearly specify whether the objects were in the hard state or not .
since dippers , like the other lmxbs , must be distributed over the two states , we presume that some of them actually reside in the soft state , and their broad - band spectra appear harder because , e.g. , their higher inclination leads to a stronger comptonization . to examine this possibility , we need to analyze broad - band non - dipping spectra of some appropriate dippers in a unified way which is consistent with the study of non - dipping objects .
the available publications are clearly inadequate for this purpose , because different authors employed different modelings . for the above purpose , we need to use an x - ray instrument with a high spectral resolution and broad - band coverage .
the most suited one is the japanese satellite suzaku @xcite , which has a soft x - ray energy resolution of @xmath8 ev realized by the x - ray imaging spectrometer ( xis ; * ? ? ?
* ) , and an energy coverage up to @xmath9 100 kev achieved by the hard x - ray detector ( hxd ; * ? ? ?
so far , five dipping lmxbs have been observed in total with suzaku , and among them , we selected the most luminous one 4u 1915 - 05 ( see section [ sec : observation ] for details ) .
this source is the first dipper discovered in 1982 @xcite , showing stable periodic dips with a period of @xmath10 mins @xcite , and frequent type i x - ray bursts @xcite .
it is also known as an ultracompact x - ray binary ( ucxb ) which has a helium rich donor star @xcite .
its 0.6 - 10 kev persistent luminosity , was @xmath11 erg s@xmath1 @xcite at an assumed distance of 9.3 kpc ( see below ) , reached the range typical of lmxbs in the soft state .
the broadband spectrum of this source was studied by @xcite using bepposax . by fitting a 0.5 - 200 kev spectrum with a cut - off power - law model
, these authors reported a rather high cut - off energy of @xmath5 80 kev , which is suggestive of strong comptonization .
however , further exploration with other x - ray satellites ( e.g. , rosat , chandra , xmm - newton ) did not give much improved knowledge of this issue due to their limited energy coverage @xcite .
furthermore , few of these studies attempted spectral classification of this object in comparison with non - dipping lmxbs . in the present paper , we utilized an archival suzaku data set of 4u 1915 - 05 acquired on 2006 november 8 .
we focus on its non - dip broadband spectral properties , while the x - ray dips are out of the scope of our study . throughout the paper , the source distance
is assumed to be 9.3 kpc , as determined by @xcite with an uncertainty of @xmath12% , using the x - ray bursts as a standard candle . using the same method ,
other studies gave similar values of 8.4 - 10.8 kpc @xcite and 7 - 9 kpc @xcite ; thus , the distance uncertainty is typically 20% . since the source shows x - ray dips , but no x - ray eclipse , its inclination angle is estimated to be @xmath13 @xcite , with a @xmath14 uncertainty @xcite .
table [ tab : fourdippers ] summarizes the suzaku observations of four dipping lmxbs among the five sources in the archive , excluding 4u 1822 - 37 which has been found to have strong magnetic field ( @xmath5 12 g ; * ? ? ?
we estimated their 1 - 50 kev luminosities , by fitting their background subtracted spectra with an absorbed cut - off power - law model , and then removing the absorption .
the bolometric corrections , which depend on the cutoff energy , are typically smaller than 1.3 .
thus , among the four dippers observed with suzaku , 4u 1915 - 05 is the most luminous , and hence is suited to our purpose of identifying a dipping lmxb in the soft state . @xmath15 the 0.8 - 10 kev xis spectrum and 15 - 40 kev hxd - pin spectrum
were fitted simultaneously .
the quoted errors refer to 90% confidence limits .
+ @xmath16 another edge was found around 3.4 kev , which is probably an ionized argon k - edge .
+ @xmath17 @xmath18 was corrected for the inclination factor @xmath19 , in which @xmath20 was assumed .
+ @xmath21 definition of @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath24 are the same as in table [ tab : totalspectra ] , however the unit is @xmath25 erg @xmath26 s@xmath1 .
|
neutron - star low - mass x - ray binary ( ns - lmxb consists mass accreting neutron star ns and mass - donating low - mass star binary roche lobe objects show bimodality in x - ray spectral states soft and hard states soft state mass accretion rate high mass companion spirals onto ns through standard accretion disk @xcite optically thick geometrically thin spectrum soft canonical model @xcite disk blackbody temperature @xmath51 kev blackbody from ns surface temperature @xmath5 2 kev latter component weakly comptonized model reinforced by studies @xcite accretion rate low source in hard state inner accretion disk transites into optically thin geometrically thick flow around ns large radial velocity component nearly free - fall ion temperature significant difference between ion and electron temperatures hot electrons comptonize ns blackbody emission harden spectrum to @xmath7 100 kev @xcite lmxbs with high inclination angles dipping lmxbs dippers periodic dips in x - ray intensity seldom have spectral states investigateddips thought caused by covering scattering region accretion disk corona by companion star new studies dips explained by obscuration of central compact x - ray source by ionized absorber outer accretion disk adc no longer required consider dipping lmxbs same objects as non - dipping lmxbs except higher inclinations examine dippers in same spectral classification scheme non - dipping lmxbs with modifications broad - band spectra of dipping lmxbs studied extensively with bepposax examples include luminous dippers 4u 1915 - 05 xb 1254 - 690 xb 1658 - 298 dimmer ones xb 1323 - 619 @xcite exo 0748 - 676 @xcite reported spectra hard extending to @xmath5 100 kev reminiscent of hard state of non - dipping lmxbs previous works specify objects in hard state dippers distributed over two states presume some reside in soft state - band spectra appear harder higher inclination to stronger comptonizationexamine possibility need analyze broad - band non - dipping spectra appropriate dippers consistent study publications inadequate different authors different modelings need use x - ray instrument high spectral resolution broad - band coverage suited japanese satellite suzaku @xcite soft x - ray energy resolution @xmath8 ev energy coverage up to @xmath9 100 kev hard x - ray detector five dipping lmxbs observed with suzaku selected luminous 4u 1915 - 05 source first dipper discovered 1982 @xcite stable periodic dips period @xmath10 mins frequent type i x - ray bursts known as ultracompact x - ray binary ( ) helium rich donor star 0.6 - 10 kev persistent luminosity @xmath11 erg s@xmath1 distance 9.3 kpc range typical of lmxbs soft state broadband spectrum studied by @xcite using bepposax 0.5 - 200 kev spectrum cut - off power - law model reported high cut - off energy @xmath5 80 kev suggestive of strong comptonization further exploration with other x - ray satellites improved knowledge limited energy coveragefew studies spectral classification object non - dipping lmxbs present paper utilized archival suzaku data set 4u 1915 - 05 acquired 2006 8 on non - dip broadband spectral properties x - ray dips out source distance assumed 9.3 kpc uncertainty @xmath12% other studies values 8.4 - 10.8 kpc @xcite 7 - 9 kpc @xcite distance uncertainty typically 20% source shows x - ray dips no eclipse inclination angle estimated @xmath13 @xcite @xmath14 uncertainty @xcite table summarizes suzaku observations four dipping lmxbs excluding 4u 1822 - 37 strong magnetic field estimated 1 - 50 kev luminosities fitting background subtracted spectra cut - off power - law model absorption bolometric corrections smaller than 1.3 4u 1915 - 05 most luminous suited identifying dipping lmxb soft state 0.8 - 10 kev xis spectrum 15 - 40 kev hxd - pin spectrum fitted simultaneously quoted errors refer to 90% confidence limits@xmath16 edge found around 3.4 kev probably ionized argon k - edge @xmath17 corrected inclination factor @xmath19 @xmath20 assumed @xmath21 definition @xmath22 same table totalspectra unit @xmath25 @xmath26@xmath1
| 0.314191
| 1,856
| 962
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,387
|
light - cone coordinates and supersymmetric discrete light - cone quantization are used to analyze the thermodynamics of two - dimensional supersymmetric quantum chromodynamics with a chern simons term in the large-@xmath0 approximation .
this requires estimation of the entire spectrum of the theory , which is done with a new algorithm based on lanczos iterations .
although this work is still in progress , some preliminary results are presented .
|
recent work@xcite has shown that thermodynamic properties can be computed for large-@xmath0 supersymmetric theories .
the approach is based on light - cone coordinates@xcite and the numerical technique of supersymmetric discrete light - cone quantization ( sdlcq).@xcite here we consider two - dimensional supersymmetric quantum chromodynamics with a chern
simons term ( sqcd - cs),@xcite dimensionally reduced from three dimensions . light - cone coordinates@xcite are defined by the time variable , @xmath1 , and spatial components , @xmath2 , where @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
the light - cone energy and momentum are given by @xmath5 and @xmath6 , respectively .
for field theories quantized in terms of these coordinates , the standard numerical technique is discrete light - cone quantization ( dlcq).@xcite space is restricted to a light - cone box @xmath7 , @xmath8 with periodic boundary conditions .
momentum is then discretized as @xmath9 , @xmath10 with @xmath11 , @xmath12 and @xmath13 all integers .
the limit @xmath14 is exchanged for a limit in terms of the integer ( harmonic ) resolution@xcite @xmath15 for fixed total momentum @xmath16 . because the @xmath11 are positive , the number of particles is limited to no more than @xmath17 .
integrals are replaced by discrete sums .
sdlcq@xcite is a special form of dlcq that preserves at least part of the supersymmetry algebra \{q^+,q^+}=2p^+ , \{q^-,q^-}=2p^- , \{q^+,q^-}=-4p_. instead of discretizing the hamiltonian @xmath18 directly , the supercharge @xmath19 is discretized , and @xmath18 is computed from the algebra as p_sdlcq^-=\{q^-,q^- } p_dlcq^- .
for ordinary dlcq , one recovers supersymmetry only in the infinite resolution limit . after a brief summary of the sqcd - cs theory ,
we show how thermodynamic quantities can be constructed from the partition function .
this requires knowledge of the spectrum of the theory , which we obtain numerically with an iterative lanczos algorithm .
some preliminary results are presented and future work discussed .
we consider a dimensional reduction from 2 + 1 to 1 + 1 dimensions of @xmath20 supersymmetric quantum chromodynamics with a chern
simons term ( sqcd - cs).@xcite the action is [ action ] s&=&d^3x\{-f_f^ + d_^d^+i| d_^. + & & -g+^d _ + & & .+^ + | } , where the adjoint fields are the gauge boson @xmath21 ( gluons ) and a majorana fermion @xmath22 ( gluinos ) and the fundamental fields are a dirac fermion @xmath23 ( quarks ) and a complex scalar @xmath24 ( squarks ) .
the chern simons coupling , @xmath25 , has the effect of providing a mass for the adjoint fields .
the covariant derivatives are d_&=&_+ig[a_,],d_=_+iga _ , + d_&=&_+iga_. the fields transform according to & & a_=_,=f_^ , + & & = , = -^d_. we reduce to 1 + 1 dimensions by assuming the fields to be independent of the transverse coordinate @xmath26 .
we define fermion components by = ( , ) ^t,=(,)^t , q=(q^+,q^-)^t .
there are constraints , which in light - cone gauge ( @xmath27 ) are written _ -&=&- ( [ a^2,]+i^-i^ ) , + _ -&=&-a^2 + -/ , [ fcurrent ] ^2_-a^-=gj , with [ current ] ji[a^2,_-a^2]+ \ { , } + _ - a^2 -ih_-^+ i_-^+^. the reduced supercharge is q^-&=&gdx^-\ { 2 ^ 3/4(i[a^2,_-a^2]-_-a^2 + \ { , } ) . + & & -(i
_ -^-i_-^+2^ ) + & & .-2(^a^2+^a^2)}. in the large-@xmath0 approximation , there are only single - trace fock states , the mesons ^_i_1(k_1 ) a^_i_1i_2(k_2) b^_i_ni_n+1(k_n-1) f^_i_p(k_n)|0and glueballs [ a^_i_1i_2(k_1) b^_i_ni_n+1(k_n)]|0 , where @xmath28 and @xmath29 create fundamental partons and @xmath30 and @xmath31 create adjoint partons
. either type of state could be a boson or a fermion .
the theory possesses a useful @xmath32 symmetry@xcite a_ij(k , n^)-a_ji(k , n^ ) , b_ij(k , n^)-b_ji(k , n^ ) , which further divides the fock space between states with even and odd numbers of gluons .
we then diagonalize in each sector separately .
from the partition function , @xmath33 , we compute the bosonic free energy _ b=_n=1^_m_n^dp_0 ( 1- e^- p_0/t ) . and the fermionic free energy _ f= -_n=1^ _ m_n^dp_0 ( 1 + e^- p_0/t ) .
the total free energy , once expanded in logarithms and @xmath34 integrals are performed , is given by ( t ,
v)=- vt^2-_n=1^_l=0^ m_n .
the sum over @xmath35 is well approximated by the first few terms .
we represent the sum over @xmath36 as an integral over a density of states @xmath37 : @xmath38 .
the density is approximated by a continuous function , and the integral @xmath39 is computed by standard numerical techniques .
the discrete density of states is @xmath40 , where @xmath41 is the degeneracy of the mass eigenvalue @xmath42 .
the density can be written in the form of a trace over the evolution operator @xmath43 : ( m^2)=_-^e^im^2x^+/2p^+ tre^-ip^-x^+ dx^+ .
we approximate the trace as an average over a random sample of vectors@xcite ( m^2)1s_s=1^s _ s(m^2 ) , with @xmath44 a local density for a single vector @xmath45 , defined by _
s(m^2)=_-^e^im^2x^+/2p^+ s|e^-ip^-x^+|sdx^+ .
the sample vectors @xmath45 can be chosen as random phase vectors;@xcite the coefficient of each fock state in the basis is a random number of modulus one .
we approximate the matrix element @xmath46 by lanczos iterations.@xcite let @xmath47 be the length of @xmath45 , and define @xmath48 as the initial lanczos vector .
the matrix element @xmath49 can be approximated by the @xmath50 element of the exponentiation of the lanczos tridiagonalization of @xmath18 .
let @xmath51 be the tridiagonal lanczos matrix .
it can be exponentiated by first diagonalizing it : p_s^-_j^s=_j^s , such that @xmath52 , with @xmath53 and @xmath54 .
the @xmath50 element is given by ( e^-ip_s^-x^+)_11=_n|(c_n^s)_1|^2e^-im_sn^2 x^+/2p^+ .
the local density can now be estimated by _
s(m^2)_n w_sn ( m^2-m_sn^2 ) , where @xmath55 is the weight of each lanczos eigenvalue .
only the extreme lanczos eigenvalues are good approximations to eigenvalues of the original @xmath18 .
the other lanczos eigenvalues provide a smeared representation of the full spectrum . from this density of states ,
we compute the cumulative distribution function ( cdf ) , @xmath56 as an average n(m^2)1s_s n_s(m^2 ) , of local cdfs n_s(m^2)^m^2 dm^2_s(m^2)_n
w_sn(m^2-m_sn^2 ) .
the convergence of the approximation is dependent on the number of lanczos iterations per sample , as well as the number @xmath57 of samples .
test runs indicate that taking 20 samples is sufficient .
the number of lanczos iterations needs to be on the order of 1000 per sample ; using only 100 leaves errors on the order of 1 - 2% .
some preliminary results are presented in the accompanying figures .
figure 1 compares the numerical results for the cdf to analytic results , which can be obtained when the yang - mills coupling is zero .
the numerical results are quite good , with only one noticeable deviation , at large @xmath58 , a region where the discrete spectrum is sparse .
figure 2 shows the free energy at particular values of the yang mills coupling . in the analytically solvable case of zero yang
mills coupling .
the numerical and analytic solutions are compared.,width=377 ] as a function of temperature @xmath59 for resolution @xmath60.,width=377 ]
additional work is in progress to complete this study of finite temperature properties of two - dimensional sqcd . beyond this particular effort , one can consider finite-@xmath0 effects , with baryons and mixing of mesons and glueballs , and the full three - dimensional theory .
as these techniques mature , analysis of four - dimensional theories can be considered .
the work reported here was done in collaboration with s. pinsky , y. proestos , n. salwen , and u. trittmann and supported in part by the us department of energy and the minnesota supercomputing institute .
0 j. r. hiller , y. proestos , s. pinsky , and n. salwen , _ phys .
d _ * 70 * , 065012 ( 2004 ) .
a. m. dirac , _ rev .
phys . _ * 21 * , 392 ( 1949 ) .
y. matsumura , n. sakai , and t. sakai , _ phys .
d _ * 52 * , 2446 ( 1995 ) .
o. lunin and s. s. pinsky , aip conf .
proc . * 494 * , 140 ( 1999 ) .
j. r. hiller , s. s. pinsky , and u. trittmann , _ nucl .
b _ * 661 * , 99 ( 2003 ) ; _ phys . rev . d _ * 67 * , 115005 ( 2003 )
pauli and s. j. brodsky , _ phys .
d _ * 32 * , 1993 ( 1985 ) ; 2001 ( 1985 ) .
s. j. brodsky , h .- c .
pauli , and s. s. pinsky , _ phys .
_ * 301 * , 299 ( 1997 )
. d. kutasov , _ nucl .
b _ * 414 * , 33 ( 1994 ) .
r. alben , m. blume , h. krakauer , and l. schwartz , _ phys .
b _ * 12 * , 4090 ( 1975 ) ; a. hams and h. de raedt , _ phys . rev . e _ * 62 * , 4365 ( 2000 ) . t. iitaka and t. ebisuzaki , _ phys . rev .
e _ * 69 * , 057701 ( 2004 ) .
j. jakli and p. prelovek , _ phys .
b _ * 49 * , 5065(r ) ( 1994 ) ; m. aichhorn , m. daghofer , h. g. evertz , and w. von der linden , _ phys .
b _ * 67 * , 161103(r ) ( 2003 ) .
|
work shown thermodynamic properties computed for large- supersymmetric theories approach based on light - cone coordinates supersymmetric discrete light - cone quantization consider two - dimensional supersymmetric quantum chromodynamics with chern simons term reduced from three dimensions light - cone coordinates defined by time spatial components @xmath2 light - cone energy momentum given by @xmath5 @xmath6 field theories quantized coordinates standard numerical technique is discrete light - cone quantization space restricted to light - cone box with periodic boundary conditions momentum discretized as @xmath9 integers limit @xmath14 exchanged for limit integer resolution for fixed total momentum @xmath11 positive number of particles limited to @xmath17 integrals replaced by discrete sums sdlcq@xcite form of dlcq preserves supersymmetry algebra+discretizing hamiltonian @xmath18 supercharge @xmath19 discretized @xmath18 computed p_sdlcq^-={q^- p_dlcq^ ordinary dlcq recovers supersymmetry infinite resolution limit summary sqcd - cs theory thermodynamic quantities from partition function requires knowledge spectrum theory iterative lanczos algorithm preliminary results future work reduction from 2 + 1 to 1 + 1 dimensions @xmath20 supersymmetric quantum chromodynamics chern simons term sqcd - cs). action s&=&d^3x\{-f_f^ + d_^d^+i -g+^d adjoint fields gauge boson @xmath21 majorana fermion @xmath22 fundamental fields dirac fermion @xmath23 complex scalar @xmath24 chern simons coupling @xmath25 mass for adjoint fields covariant derivatives d_&=&_+ig[a_=_+iga_=+iga fields transform to_==f_^^d reduce to 1 + 1 dimensions fields independent of transverse coordinate @xmath26define fermion components ^t^t q^-)^t constraints light - cone gauge @xmath27 written -&=&- a^2+i^-i^-a^2 ^2_-a^-=gj current[a^2,-a^2]-^-^+^ reduced supercharge q^-&=&gdx^- 3/4(i[a^2-a^2]-_-a^2 -^-i_-^+2^(^a^2+^a^2) large-@xmath0 approximation single - trace fock states mesons ^_i_1(k_1 ) a^_i_1i_2(k_2) b^_i_ni_n+1(k_n-1) f^_i_p(k_n) glueballs a^_i_1i_2(k_1 b^_i_ni_n+1(k_n)|0 @xmath28 @xmath29 create fundamental partons @xmath30 @xmath31 adjoint partons state boson or fermion theory @xmath32 symmetry a_ij(k-a_ji divides fock space between states even odd numbers gluons diagonalize each sector separatelypartition function @xmath33 compute bosonic free energy_n^dp_0 1- p_0/t fermionic free energy f_n=1 m_n^dp_0 1 e^- p_0/t total free energy logarithms @xmath34 integrals t v= vt^2-_n=1^_l=0 m_n sum @xmath35 approximated terms @xmath36 integral density states @xmath37 @xmath38 density approximated continuous function integral @xmath39 computed numerical techniques discrete density states @xmath40 @xmath41 degeneracy mass eigenvalue @xmath42 density trace evolution operator @xmath43 m^2)=_-^e^im^2x^+/2p^-ip-x trace average random sample vectors m^2)1s(m^2 @xmath44 local density single vector @xmath45 defined s(m^2)=_-^e^im^2x^+/2p^ sample vectors @xmath45 random phase vectors coefficient fock state random number modulus one approximate matrix element @xmath46 lanczos iterations@xmath47 length @xmath45 @xmath48 initial lanczos vector matrix element @xmath49 approximated @xmath50 element lanczos tridiagonalization @xmath18 @xmath51 tridiagonal lanczos matrix exponentiated diagonalizing p_s^-_j^s=_j^s @xmath52 @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath50 element given e^-ip_s^-x^+)_11=_n|(c_n^s)_1|^2e^-im_sn^2 x^+/2p^+ local density estimated by s(m^2)_n w_sn ( m^2-m_sn^2 ) @xmath55 weight each lanczos eigenvalue extreme lanczos eigenvalues approximations original @xmath18 other representation full spectrum density compute cumulative distribution function @xmath56 average n(m^2)1s_s n_s(m^2 ) local cdfs n_s(m^2)^m^2^2-m_sn^2 convergence approximation lanczos iterations per sample number @xmath57 samples 20 samples sufficient iterations 1000 per sample 100 errors 1 - 2% preliminary results figuresfigure 1 compares numerical results cdf to analytic results yang - mills coupling zero numerical results good one noticeable deviation at @xmath58 discrete spectrum sparse figure 2 shows free energy at values yang mills coupling zero yang mills coupling numerical analytic solutions compared function temperature @xmath59 resolution additional work study finite temperature properties two - sqcd consider finite-@xmath0 effects baryons mixing mesons glueballs full three - dimensional theory techniques mature analysis four - dimensional theories work with s. pinsky y. proestos n. salwen u. trittmann supported by us department energy minnesota supercomputing institute j. r. hiller proestos pinsky salwen phys . 70, 065012 ( 2004 ) a m. dirac phys 21 392 ( 1949 ) y. matsumura n. sakai t. sakai phys 52 2446 ( 1995 ) lunin s s. pinsky 494 140 ( 1999 ) r. hiller pinsky trittmann 661 * 99 ( 2003 )67 115005 2003 ) pauli brodsky 32 1993 ( 1985 ) 2001 s. j. brodsky pauli s pinsky phys 301 299 ( 1997 ) d. kutasov 414 33 ( 1994 ) r. alben m. blume h. krakauer l. schwartz 12 4090 ( 1975 ) a. hams h. de raedt 62 4365 ( 2000 ) t. iitaka t. ebisuzaki 69 057701 ( 2004 ) j. jakli p. prelovek phys 49 5065(r ) ( 1994 ) m. aichhorn m. daghofer. evertz w. von der linden 67 * 161103 ( 2003 )
| 0.433458
| 2,865
| 1,505
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,390
|
the search for the standard model ( sm ) higgs boson based on 4.7 - 4.9 @xmath0 of pp collision data at @xmath1 tev recorded with the atlas detector is presented here .
the combined atlas results exclude the sm higgs boson masses ( @xmath2 ) of 110.0 - 117.5 , 118.5 - 122.5 and 129 - 539 gev at 95% confidence level .
an excess of events has been observed around @xmath3 gev with the global probability of 30% ( 10% ) to occur anywhere in @xmath4 ( @xmath5 ) gev .
|
the higgs mechanism @xcite provides a general framework to explain the observed masses of the w and z gauge bosons through electroweak symmetry breaking . within the standard model ( sm )
, this mechanism posits the existence of a scalar boson , the higgs boson , with an a priori unknown mass ( @xmath2 ) .
the direct searches for the sm higgs boson at the lep experiments have excluded @xmath6 gev @xcite , while the searches at the tevatron exclude @xmath7 gev @xcite . however , a global fit of the electroweak measurements performed at lep , sld and the tevatron experiments , predicts a sm higgs boson mass of @xmath8 gev .
the sm higgs searches in atlas have been performed over a wide range of higgs boson masses ( 110 - 600 gev ) considering different sm production mechanisms ( gluon fusion , vector boson fusion and vector boson associated production ) and their subsequent decay modes .
the detector resolution for the reconstructed higgs boson mass plays a crucial role in classifying the searches into numerous channels having different selection criteria as detailed below .
the sm higgs boson signal events have been simulated using powheg and pythia generators , while the background contributions have been estimated either using simulation , or directly from data as appropriate .
searches in these channels are focused on high mass higgs boson searches over a typical higgs mass range of 200 - 600 gev . in the zz channels
the events are required to have a lepton pair ( @xmath12 or @xmath13 ) with reconstructed @xmath14 close to the z boson mass .
the selected events for the @xmath15 @xcite search are further classified into two subcategories considering the pile - up effects ( ` low ' and ` high ' ) on the reconstructed missing transverse energies ( @xmath16 ) , while the @xmath17 @xcite search considers ` tagged ' ( 2 b - tagged jets ) and ` untagged ' ( @xmath18 b - tagged jets ) events separately .
figures [ fig : searchchannels ] ( a ) and [ fig : searchchannels ] ( b ) show the transverse mass distribution for @xmath15 candidates in the ` low ' pile - up data , and @xmath19 distribution for @xmath17 in ` tagged ' selection respectively .
the selection criteria for the @xmath20 search @xcite are optimized over a higgs boson mass range of 300 - 600 gev considering ` h+0jet ' , ` h+1jet ' and ` h+2jets ' ( mostly from the vector boson fusion processes ) . the search in this channel @xcite consists of event categories with different lepton flavor combinations , while the sm @xmath22 production processes remain irreducible background at the final level of event selection
. full reconstruction of the higgs boson mass is possible for this channel with excellent mass resolution ( 2% and 1.5% for 4e and 4@xmath23 at @xmath24 gev ) .
the 4-lepton invariant mass ( @xmath25 ) distribution is displayed in figure [ fig : searchchannels ] ( c ) .
although @xmath27 decays have small branching ratio ( about 0.2% ) , search in this channel @xcite has the potential to discover the higgs boson in the low mass range ( 110 - 150 gev ) .
the analysis is split into nine independent sub - channels based on the photon pseudorapidity , conversion status , and the momentum component of the diphoton system transverse to the thrust axis ( @xmath28 ) .
the background distribution is obtained by fitting the @xmath29 distribution in data with a smoothly falling exponential function , while the atlas @xmath29 mass resolution is approximately 1.4% for @xmath30 gev .
the diphoton invariant mass distribution is shown in figure [ fig : searchchannels ] ( d ) . [ cols="^,^,^ " , ] the searches in this channel @xcite cover a wide range of @xmath4 gev consisting of different number of jets ( 0 , 1 and 2 jets ) and lepton flavor combinations ( ee , @xmath32 and @xmath33 ) in the final states .
the reconstructed ww transverse mass ( @xmath34 ) has been utilized in this analysis as a discriminating variable as shown in figure [ fig : searchchannels](e ) for the ` h+0jet ' sub - channel .
the searches in @xmath36 channels @xcite are optimized for @xmath2 of 110 - 130 gev .
the main advantage with these channels is due to the large @xmath37 at low @xmath2 , along with the possibility to fully reconstruct the higgs boson mass through @xmath38 .
the final states with one or two charged leptons are sub - categorized depending on the transverse momentum of the reconstructed vector boson , and the lepton flavors .
figure [ fig : searchchannels ] ( f ) shows the @xmath38 distribution for the @xmath39 sub - channel .
@xmath43 searches @xcite consist of all possible leptonic and hadronic ( @xmath44 ) decay modes of the @xmath45-leptons originating from the higgs boson decay . for the @xmath46 and @xmath47 channels , invariant mass of the @xmath48 system
is reconstructed assuming collinear approximation .
the searches in @xmath49 channel reconstruct the @xmath50 using the missing mass calculator techniques @xcite where the full event topology is reconstructed using the kinematics of the @xmath45-lepton decay products .
the results from the aforesaid search channels have been utilized to set an upper limit on the sm higgs boson production cross section as a function of the @xmath2 .
the limits are conveniently expressed in terms of the signal strength ( @xmath51 ) , the ratio of a given higgs boson production cross section ( @xmath52 ) to its sm predicted value ( @xmath53 ) .
the @xmath54 prescription@xcite with a profile likelihood ratio test statistic , @xmath55 @xcite has been utilized here to derive the exclusion limits .
figure [ fig : combination ] shows the exclusion limits on @xmath23 at 95% confidence level ( cl ) for individual search channels , along with the combined ones from all search channels over the @xmath2 range of 110 - 150 gev .
a small excess of events near @xmath3 gev is observed in @xmath26 and @xmath21 search channels , both of which fully reconstruct the higgs boson mass with high resolution .
range of 110 - 150 gev ( right).,title="fig:",width=192,height=144 ] range of 110 - 150 gev ( right).,title="fig:",width=192,height=144 ]
atlas has performed extensive searches for the sm higgs boson utilizing the full 4.7 - 4.9 @xmath0 dataset recorded during the 2011 lhc operations .
the atlas combination @xcite from numerous search channels excludes the sm higgs boson mass in ranges of 110.0 - 117.5 gev , 118.5 - 122.5 gev , and 129 - 539 gev at the 95% cl , while an exclusion of 120 gev@xmath56555 gev is expected in the absence of higgs signal .
furthermore , the exclusion limits have been recalculated at 99% cl and the sm higgs boson over a mass range of 130 - 486 gev has been excluded .
the excess in the observed data has a local significance of 2.5@xmath57 , where the expected significance in the presence of a sm higgs boson with @xmath58 gev is 2.9@xmath52 .
the global probability for such an excess to occur across the entire sm higgs mass range ( 110 - 600 gev ) is estimated to be 30% .
however , the said probability reduces to nearly 10% if a 110 - 146 gev mass range for the sm higgs boson is considered .
99 p. higgs , phys .
* 12 * 132 ( 1964 ) ; p. higgs , phys .
* 13 * 508 ( 1964 ) ; p. higgs , phys . rev . * 145 * 1156 ( 1966 ) ; f. englert and r. brout , phys . lett . * 13 * 321 ( 1964 ) .
the lep working group for higgs boson searches , phys .
b * 565 * 61 ( 2003 ) .
the tevnph working group , arxiv:1107.5518v2 [ hep - ex ] ( 2011 ) .
atlas collaboration , atlas - conf-2012 - 016 , http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1429665 .
atlas collaboration , atlas - conf-2012 - 017 , http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1429666 .
atlas collaboration , atlas - conf-2012 - 018 , http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1429667 .
atlas collaboration , phys .
b * 710 * 383 ( 2012 ) .
atlas collaboration , phys .
* 108 * 111803 ( 2012 ) .
atlas collaboration , atlas - conf-2012 - 012 , http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1429660 .
atlas collaboration , atlas - conf-2012 - 015 , http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1429664 .
atlas collaboration , atlas - conf-2012 - 014 , http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1429662 .
a. elagin _
et al . _ ,
a654 * 481 ( 2011 ) , arxiv:1012.4686 [ hep - ex ] .
a. read , j. phys .
* g28 * 2693 ( 2002 ) . g. cowan _
et al . _ ,
j. * c71 * 1554 ( 2011 ) .
atlas collaboration , atlas - conf-2012 - 019 , http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1430033 .
|
higgs mechanism @xcite masses w z gauge bosons standard model posits scalar boson higgs unknown mass @xmath2 ) searches sm higgs boson at lep excluded @xmath6 gev @xcite tevatron exclude @xmath7 gev global fit electroweak measurements lep sld tevatron predicts sm higgs boson mass @xmath8 gev sm higgs searches in atlas performed over range higgs boson masses 110 - 600 gev production mechanisms decay modes detector resolution reconstructed higgs boson mass searches into channels selection criteria sm higgs boson signal events simulated using powheg pythia generators background contributions estimated simulation or from data searches channels high mass higgs boson searches mass range 200 - 600 gev zz channels events required lepton pair ( @xmath12 or @xmath13 ) with reconstructed @xmath14 close to z boson massselected events for @xmath15 search classified into subcategories pile - up effects on missing transverse energies @xmath17 search considers tagged untagged events separately figures show transverse mass distribution for @xmath15 candidates low pile - up @xmath17 tagged selection criteria for @xmath20 optimized over higgs boson mass range 300 - 600 gev h+2jets from vector boson fusion processes search consists of event categories with different lepton flavor combinations @xmath22 production processes remain irreducible background at final event selection full reconstruction of higgs boson mass possible with excellent mass resolution ( 2% and 1.5% for@xmath23 @xmath24 gev 4-lepton invariant mass ( @xmath25 distribution displayed in figure @xmath27 decays small branching ratio 0.2% discover higgs boson in low mass range 110 - 150 gev analysis split into nine sub - channels on photon pseudorapidity conversion status momentum component of diphoton system transverse to thrust axis ( @xmath28 )background distribution fitting @xmath29 distribution data exponential function @xmath29 mass resolution 1.4% for @xmath30 gev diphoton invariant mass distribution shown in figure searchchannels searches cover @xmath4 gev different jets lepton flavor combinations reconstructed ww transverse mass @xmath34 utilized discriminating variable sub - channel searches in @xmath36 channels optimized for @xmath2 110 - 130 gev advantage large @xmath37 at low @xmath2 possibility reconstruct higgs boson mass through @xmath38 final states with one or two charged leptons sub - categorized transverse momentum reconstructed vector boson lepton flavors @xmath38 distribution for @xmath39 sub - channel @xmath43 searches consist leptonic hadronic decay modes of @xmath45-leptons higgs boson decay @xmath46 @xmath47 channels invariant mass of @xmath48 system reconstructed collinear approximation searches @xmath49 channel reconstruct @xmath50 using missing mass calculator techniques full event topology reconstructed using kinematics @xmath45-lepton decay productsresults search channels upper limit sm higgs boson production cross section @xmath2 limits expressed in signal strength @xmath51 ratio higgs boson production to sm predicted value @xmath54@xcite @xmath55 utilized exclusion limits figure shows exclusion limits on @xmath23 at 95% confidence combined @xmath2 range 110 - 150 gev small excess events near @xmath3 gev in @xmath26 @xmath21 search channels reconstruct higgs boson mass high resolution range 110 - 150 gev atlas performed searches for sm higgs boson 4.7 - 4.9 @xmath0 dataset 2011 operations atlas combination @xcite excludes sm higgs boson mass in ranges 110.0 - 117.5 gev 118.5 - 122.5 gev 129 - 539 gev at 95% cl exclusion of 120@xmath56555 gev expected in absence higgs signal exclusion limits recalculated at 99% cl sm higgs boson over 130 - 486 gev excludedexcess in observed data local significance 2.5@xmath57 expected significance sm higgs boson with @xmath58 gev 2.9@xmath52 global probability excess sm higgs mass range 110 - 600 gev 30% probability reduces to 10% if 110 - 146 gev mass range sm higgs boson considered higgs phys . 12 * 132 ( 1964 ) 13 * 508 ( 1964 ) 145 * 1156 ( 1966 ) englert r brout phys 13 * 321 ( 1964 ) lep working group for higgs boson searches phys . * 565 * 61 ( 2003 ) tevnph working group arxiv:1107.5518v2 hep - ex ( 2011 ) atlas collaboration atlas - conf-2012 - 016 conf-2012 - 017 conf-2012 - 018 collaboration * 710 * 383 ( 2012 ) 108 * 111803 ( 2012 ) conf-2012 - 012 conf-2012 - 015 conf-2012 - 014elagin a654 481 2011 arxiv:1012.4686 hep read phys g28 2693 ( 2002 ) cowan c71 * 1554 2011 atlas collaboration atlas - conf-2012 - 019 http://cdsweb/record/1430033
| 0.348967
| 2,277
| 1,160
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,394
|
we apply the method of dalgarno and lewis to scattering states and discuss the choice of the unperturbed model in order to have a convergent perturbation series for the phase shift .
|
there has been some interest in the application of on shell perturbation theory to simple scattering problems in one dimension @xcite . those approaches
were mainly based on logarithmic perturbation theory@xcite and the dalgarno
lewis perturbation theory@xcite . in order to bypass the problem posed by the nodes of real wavefunctions they used complex wavefunctions ( jost functions ) . although the method of dalgarno and lewis was proposed as a device to calculate sum over states@xcite it proves to be an efficient approach for on shell perturbation theory@xcite .
this method has recently been applied to solve the differential equation for the density distribution in scattering problems@xcite .
the purpose of this paper is to discuss the application of the dalgarno and lewis perturbation theory to potential scattering using real wavefunctions .
we also consider the choice of the unperturbed or reference model in order to have convergent perturbation series for the phase shift . in sec .
[ sec : model ] we introduce the model . in sec .
[ sec : method ] we propose an alternative application of the method of dalgarno and steward and a choice of the unperturbed model potential . in sec .
[ sec : example ] we apply the main equations to an illustrative example , and in sec . [ sec : conclusions ] we summarize the main results of the paper and draw some conclusions .
for simplicity we consider the one dimensional model @xmath0 and choose the boundary condition @xmath1 in order to mimic the s states of a central field model .
the prime denotes differentiation with respect to the coordinate .
the potential energy function @xmath2 is negative for @xmath3 and zero for @xmath4 . in order to derive a dimensionless differential equation we define the new independent variable @xmath5 and
rewrite eq .
( [ eq : schro ] ) as @xmath6y(x ) \label{eq : y"}\ ] ] where @xmath7 the boundary conditions are @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the phase shift and @xmath10 . in order to avoid ambiguities regarding to multiples of @xmath11 we choose @xmath12 to satisfiy @xmath13 . in order to apply perturbation theory we choose a closely related problem @xmath14y_{0}(x ) \label{eq : y0"}\ ] ] with similar boundary conditions @xmath15 as it is custommary in most applications of perturbation theory we write @xmath16 , where the perturbation parameter @xmath17 is set equal to unity at the end of the calculation , and expand @xmath18
for simplicity we write @xmath19 , and @xmath20 . the function @xmath21 satisfies the differential equation @xmath22 where @xmath23 .
since the nodes of @xmath24 and @xmath25 do not coincide one expects @xmath26 to have poles at the nodes of @xmath25 .
however , @xmath26 does not appear in the resulting expression for @xmath24 ( see below ) and , consequently , that problem does not arise in practical applications of the method of dalgarno and lewis .
notice that @xmath27 is the wronskian of the perturbed and unperturbed solutions . on integrating eq .
( [ eq : diff_eq_f ] ) we have @xmath28 at @xmath29 we substitute the asymptotic forms of @xmath24 and @xmath25 into the wronskian and obtain an expression for the phase shift @xmath30 if we integrate eq .
( [ eq : wronsk2 ] ) between @xmath29 and @xmath31 and multiply the result by @xmath25 we obtain an expression for @xmath24 : @xmath32 where @xmath33 is an integration constant .
notice that this expression is free from poles because the function @xmath26 does not appear explicitly in it . when @xmath34 then @xmath35 and we substitute eq .
( [ eq : sin_phase ] ) for the second integral in eq .
( [ eq : y(x ) ] ) .
moreover , in order to have the correct asymptotic expression for @xmath24 the integration constant should be @xmath36 that we also expand in a power series : @xmath37 finally , it follows from equations ( [ eq : sin_phase ] ) , ( [ eq : y(x ) ] ) , and ( [ eq : c ] ) that @xmath38 @xmath39 and @xmath40 at the jth perturbation step we first solve for @xmath41 and @xmath42 and then calculate @xmath43 .
those expressions are sufficient for present discussion , one can easily derive as many as necessary from the equations above .
the number of necessary perturbation corrections depends on the convergence rate of the perturbation series .
for that reason it is important to choose a convenient unperturbed or reference potential @xmath44 .
it has been argued that in order to have an adequate rate of convercence the unperturbed and perturbed potentials should support the same number of bound states@xcite .
this conclusion is based on levinson s theorem than in our case takes the form @xmath45 , where @xmath46 is the number of bound states@xcite . here
we investigate the application of the bargmann
schwinger upper limit to the number of bound states @xcite and require that at least @xmath47 although this condition does not completely guarantee that both potentials have the same number of bound states , it is a reasonable choice that will prove sound in the example below .
the simplest exactly solvable unperturbed model is one with a constant potential @xmath48 in which case @xmath49 the starting
point of the calculation are the unperturbed solutions @xmath50 where we choose @xmath51 so that @xmath52 as stated above .
in what follows we compare the perturbation results with accurate numerical phase shifts calculated by a straightforward power series method . to this end
we assume that the taylor series of the potential around @xmath53 , @xmath54 converges at @xmath29 , and expand the solution in the same way : @xmath55 , where @xmath56 and @xmath57 , @xmath58 .
finally , we obtain the phase shift as @xmath59 as an illustrative example , we choose @xmath60 that can be solved in terms of confluent hypergeometric functions@xcite .
however , here we resort to the power series approach because it is suitable for more general problems and converges fast in most cases .
the power
series approach also enables us to obtain the bound
state energies from the conditon @xmath61 we choose a well of depth @xmath62 as unperturbed model and the simple condition ( [ eq : bs_limit ] ) gives us @xmath63 .
we could obtain analytical expressions for @xmath64 , @xmath65 and @xmath66 but we only show the first perturbation correction because the other ones are too long .
@xmath67 \sin \left ( \sqrt{k^{2}+v_{0}}\right ) \cos \left ( \sqrt{k^{2}+v_{0}}\right ) \right .
\nonumber \\ & & \left .
+ \sqrt{k^{2}+v_{0}}\left [ 3a\sin \left ( \sqrt{k^{2}+v_{0}}\right ) ^{2}-a\left ( k^{2}+v_{0}+3\right ) \right .
\nonumber \\ & & \left .
+ 6v_{0}\left ( k^{2}+v_{0}\right ) \right ] \right\ } \label{eq : model_delta1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in order to test the accuracy of perturbation theory we choose parabolic wells with @xmath68 with no bound states , and @xmath69 with one bound state .
figures 1 and 2 show the logarithmic error @xmath70 , where @xmath71 and @xmath72 denote power series and perturbation theory , respectively .
we clearly appreciate that the perturbation series converges for both parabolic well strengths , and for all energies . for some @xmath73 values
the perturbation series of order @xmath74 may be more accurate than the one of order @xmath75 .
we do not know if this behaviour is fortuitous or if there is a mathematical or physical reason behind .
table [ tab : err_av ] shows the average relative error @xmath76/\delta _ { ps}(k_{j})| $ ] for some @xmath77values .
we clearly appreciate that the perturbation series converges smoothly .
one can easily apply the method of dalgarno and steward to more general problems of the form @xmath78 where @xmath79 denotes a differential operation on @xmath24 . we choose a convenient unperturbed problem @xmath80 and proceed as in sec .
[ sec : model ] .
we obtain the following general equation @xmath81 where we can choose the arbitrary integration limits @xmath82 and @xmath83 and constants @xmath84 , and @xmath85 , conveniently according to the problem .
notice that if @xmath86 then @xmath87 is a solution of @xmath88 and @xmath89 .
that is to say , @xmath25 and @xmath90 are two independent solutions of the unperturbed model .
it is not difficult to verify that the method of dalgarno and lewis applies to velocity
dependent problems@xcite .
if we choose @xmath91y(x)+\lambda \rho ( x)y^{\prime \prime } ( x ) \nonumber \\ & & -\lambda \left [ y^{\prime } ( x)-\frac{y(x)}{x}\right ] \rho ^{\prime } ( x ) \label{eq : q_jag}\end{aligned}\ ] ] then we have the model treated by jaghoub@xcite . therefore ,
if @xmath92y_{0}(x ) \label{eq : q0_jag}\ ] ] we have @xmath93 \rho ^{\prime } y_{0}. \label{eq:(qy0-q0y)_jag}\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we expand @xmath24 as in eq .
( [ eq : pt_series ] ) and @xmath94 then we obtain jaghoub s perturbation equations@xcite provided that we choose the arbitrary constants conveniently . in other words : jaghoub s procedure is merely the method of dalgarno and lewis for bound states developed in a different way . by means of the equations displayed above
, the reader can easily verify that present implementation of the method of dalgarno and lewis is also suitable for the treatment of scattering problems with velocity
dependent interactions@xcite . for @xmath68 . ,
width=340 ] [ fig : a6 ] for @xmath69 . , width=340 ] [ fig : a18 ]
we have shown that the method of dalgarno and lewis is suitable for the calculation of phase shifts by means of perturbation theory .
one can use real eigenfunctions because their nodes do not cause the occurrence of poles into the solutions .
the constant potential is a suitable unperturbed or reference model for the application of perturbation theory to some problems .
a simple prescription for the well depth leads to reasonable convergence rate and enables one to obtain accurate results with perturbation series of low order .
|
interest in application on shell perturbation theory to scattering problems in one dimension approaches based on logarithmic theory dalgarno lewis perturbation theory to bypass problem used complex wavefunctions ( functions method of dalgarno and lewis proposed sum over states efficient approach for method applied to solve differential equation for density distribution in scattering problems purpose paper discuss application dalgarno and lewis perturbation theory to potential scattering using real wavefunctions consider choice unperturbed reference model convergent perturbation series for phase shift introduce model propose alternative application of method choice unperturbed model potential apply main equations to illustrative example summarize results draw conclusions consider one dimensional model @xmath0 choose boundary condition @xmath1 to mimic s states of central field model prime denotes differentiation coordinate potential energy function @xmath2 negative for @xmath3 zero for @xmath4 to derive dimensionless differential equation define new independent variable @xmath5 rewrite eq as @xmath6y(x ) @xmath7 boundary conditions are @xmath8 @xmath9 phase shift and @xmath10avoid ambiguities multiples @xmath11 choose @xmath12 @xmath13 apply perturbation theory choose related problem @xmath14y_{0}(x ) similar boundary conditions @xmath15 write @xmath16 perturbation parameter @xmath17 equal unity expand @xmath18 write @xmath19 @xmath20 function @xmath21 satisfies differential equation @xmath22 @xmath23 nodes @xmath24 @xmath25 coincide expects @xmath26 poles nodes @xmath25 @xmath26 appear resulting expression @xmath24 problem arise practical applications method dalgarno lewis @xmath27 wronskian perturbed unperturbed solutions integrating eq diff_eq_f @xmath28 @xmath29 substitute asymptotic forms @xmath24 @xmath25 wronskian obtain expression phase shift @xmath30 integrate eq wronsk2 @xmath29 @xmath31 multiply result @xmath25 obtain expression @xmath24 : @xmath32 @xmath33 integration constant expression free from poles function @xmath26 appear @xmath34 @xmath35 substitute eq . sin_phase second integral eq . eq : y(x ) ]correct asymptotic expression for @xmath24 integration constant be @xmath36 expand in power series : @xmath37 follows from equations eq : sin_phase : y(x ) c ] @xmath38 @xmath40 jth perturbation step solve @xmath41 @xmath42 calculate @xmath43 expressions sufficient for discussion derive many from equations necessary perturbation corrections depends on convergence rate perturbation series important choose convenient unperturbed reference potential @xmath44 adequate unperturbed potentials support same number bound states@xcite conclusion based on levinson s theorem form @xmath45 @xmath46 is number of bound states@xcite investigate application bargmann schwinger upper limit to number bound states @xcite require least @xmath47 guarantee potentials same number bound states reasonable choice example simplest solvable unperturbed model constant potential @xmath48 @xmath49 starting point calculation unperturbed solutions @xmath50 choose @xmath51 @xmath52 compare perturbation results with accurate numerical phase shifts power series methodassume taylor series potential around @xmath53 @xmath54 converges at @xmath29 expand solution @xmath55 @xmath56 @xmath57 @xmath58 obtain phase shift @xmath59 choose @xmath60 solved confluent hypergeometric functions@xcite resort to power series approach suitable for general problems converges fast power series bound state energies from conditon @xmath61 choose well depth @xmath62 unperturbed model simple condition eq : bs_limit ] gives @xmath63 obtain analytical expressions for @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath66 show first perturbation correction other too long @xmath67 \left \sqrt{k^{2}+v_{0}}\right )+v_\nonumber{k^{2}+v_{0}}{k^{2}+v_{0}}\right\left k^{2}+v_{0}+3\right )\nonumber6v_{0}\left ( k^{2}+v_{0}\right ) \right{eq model_delta1}\end{aligned} test accuracy perturbation theory choose parabolic wells @xmath68 no bound @xmath69 one bound state figures 1 2 show logarithmic error @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 denote power series perturbation theory perturbation series converges parabolic well strengths all energies @xmath73 values series @xmath74 accurate than @xmath75 fortuitous mathematical reason table shows average relative error @xmath76/\delta}(k_{j}) @xmath77values perturbation series converges smoothly apply method dalgarno steward general problems @xmath78 @xmath79 differential operation on @xmath24 choose unperturbed problem @xmath80 proceed obtain general equation @xmath81 choose arbitrary integration limits @xmath82 @xmath83 constants @xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 solution of @xmath88 @xmath89 @xmath25 @xmath90 independent solutions unperturbed model method of dalgarno and lewis applies to velocity dependent problemschoose @xmath91y(x)+\lambda \rho ( x)y^{\prime } ( x ) \nonumber -\lambda \left y^{\prime } ( x)-\frac{y(x)}{x}\right ]\rho{\prime } ( x ) \label{eq : q_jag}\end{aligned} model treated by jaghoub@xcite @xmath92y_{0}(x ) \label{eq : q0_jag} @xmath93 \rho{\prime } y_{0}.\label{eq:(qy0-q0y)_jag}\end{aligned} expand @xmath24 eq : pt_series ] @xmath94 obtain jaghoub s perturbation equations@xcite choose arbitrary constants jaghoub s procedure method of dalgarno and lewis for bound states suitable scattering problems velocity dependent interactions@xcite @xmath68 width=340 @xmath69 a18 method dalgarno and lewis suitable calculation phase shifts perturbation theory use real eigenfunctions cause poles constant potential suitable model perturbation theory prescription for well depth leads reasonable convergence rate accurate results perturbation series low order
| 0.356876
| 2,523
| 1,367
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,395
|
both components of the standard model , qcd and the electroweak sector , are tested in the h1 and zeus experiments at hera . the inclusive @xmath0 and @xmath1 single and double differential cross sections for neutral and charged current processes are measured in the range of four - momentum transfer squared , @xmath2 , between @xmath3 and @xmath4 gev@xmath5 , and bjorken @xmath6 between @xmath7 and @xmath8 . the neutral current double differential cross section , from which the proton structure function @xmath9and the longitudinal structure function @xmath10are extracted , is measured at low @xmath6 with typically 1% statistical and 2 - 3% systematic uncertainties . in a next - to - leading order ( nlo ) dglap qcd analysis using the h1 measurements and the @xmath11 data of the bcdms collaboration the strong coupling constant @xmath12 and the gluon momentum distribution are simultaneously determined .
a value of @xmath13 is obtained , with an additional theoretical uncertainty of about @xmath14 , mainly due to the uncertainty of the renormalisation scale .
@xmath15 , the charm contribution to @xmath16 , is measured and well described by the boson gluon fusion production mechanism using the gluon distribution from the nlo qcd analysis . the gluon distribution and the strong coupling constant @xmath12
are also determined from jet production . for @xmath17 @xmath18 ,
an asymmetry between @xmath19 and @xmath20 neutral current scattering is observed and the structure function @xmath21 is extracted .
a fit to the charged current data is used to determine a value for the @xmath22 boson propagator mass .
all data are found to be in good agreement with standard model predictions .
= 14.5pt _ talk given at xv rencontres de physique de la valle daoste , la thuile , italy , + march 4 - 10 , 2001 _ mpi phe/200113 + july 2001
|
an understanding of the structure of the proton in terms of partons , i.e. quarks and gluons which follow qcd dynamics , was established to a large extent in lepton - proton , in particular electron - proton , deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) . at the hera @xmath23 collider with an electron - proton centre - of - mass energy of @xmath24=320 gev , effects of the electroweak sector
can also be tested in dis in the region where the squared four momentum transfer @xmath25 or @xmath26 ( @xmath27 and @xmath28 are the @xmath29 and @xmath22 boson masses ) .
in addition , signals of new physics beyond the standard model may be expected to arise at the highest @xmath2 where the proton structure is probed at smallest distances . deep inelastic scattering , fig . [ fig1 ] , depends on three variables , @xmath2 , @xmath6 and @xmath30 , where @xmath31 and @xmath32 is the fraction of the proton momentum carried by the struck quark and @xmath33 is the inelasticity of the interaction .
the variables are related via @xmath34 .
the electron - proton neutral current ( nc ) and charged current ( cc ) cross sections can each be expressed in terms of three proton structure functions .
for neutral current interactions mediated by a @xmath35 or @xmath29 boson , the proton structure function @xmath9 dominates the cross section and is proportional to the sum of the quark momentum distributions weighted by the quark charge squared .
the longitudinal structure function @xmath10 is directly sensitive to the gluon momentum distribution .
the structure function @xmath36 is related to valence quarks only .
these three proton structure functions have been measured at hera and confronted with the standard model predictions . the gluon momentum distribution and the strong coupling @xmath12 determined in a qcd analysis of the hera inclusive data have been cross checked in more exclusive channels such as charm and jet production via boson gluon fusion .
the propagator mass @xmath28 has been determined from the @xmath2 dependence of the cc interactions and can be compared with direct @xmath28 mass measurements in @xmath37 and @xmath38 interactions .
thus , measurements at hera provide tests of both components of the theory , the electroweak sector and the evolution of the parton densities as predicted by perturbative qcd .
the first @xmath16 measurements@xcite in @xmath23 interactions at hera , based on a luminosity of 0.025 pb@xmath39 collected in 1992 , revealed at low @xmath6 a pronounced rise of @xmath16 with decreasing @xmath6 which generated a new interest in qcd in dis . since then the collected luminosity has been increased by more than three orders of magnitude .
in addition , the h1 and zeus detectors have been continuously improved . in 1995/1996 new detector components
were installed by h1 : the backward calorimeter spacal , the backward drift chamber bdc and the backward silicon tracker bst . in 1995
the zeus collaboration installed a beam pipe calorimeter ( bpc ) and in 1997 a beam pipe tracker ( bpt ) was added , covering very small angles of the scattered electron .
these improvements and the increase in luminosity made it possible to extend the measured region@xcite to very low @xmath40 gev@xmath5 , covering the transition region from dis to real photoproduction ( @xmath41 ) , as well as very high @xmath42 gev@xmath5 .
the variable @xmath6 ranges from @xmath7 to 0.65 in the valence quark region .
@xmath43 measurements@xcite at hera together with fixed target experiments are shown in fig .
[ f2 ] as a function of @xmath2 for different values of @xmath6 .
the h1 and zeus data agree very well in the full range accessible by the hera experiments . at very low @xmath44
, the hera data overlap and agree with the data of the fixed target experiments . in a large part of the phase space
the precision of the data is @xmath45 which is comparable with that of fixed target experiments .
( 0,0 ) ( 185,200)(a ) ( 185,75)(b ) ( 250,180)(c ) ( 0,0 ) ( 165,220)(a ) ( 400,100)(b ) the results on the reduced nc cross section , defined as the cross section divided by the kinematical factor @xmath46 with @xmath47 and @xmath48 , the fine structure constant , are shown in fig .
[ redsec ] as function of @xmath6 for @xmath49 gev@xmath5 . at very high @xmath30 ( @xmath50 ) ,
i.e. the lowest x points at fixed @xmath2 , a turn over is visible in the measured cross section which is due to the longitudinal structure function @xmath51 . from these high - y cross sections , @xmath51 was extracted@xcite as shown in fig .
this extends the knowledge of the longitudinal structure function to much lower @xmath6 than available from fixed target lepton - proton scattering experiments .
the increase of @xmath52 towards low @xmath6 is consistent with the qcd calculation , reflecting the rise of the gluon momentum distribution towards low @xmath6 .
another quantity related to the gluon density is the derivative @xmath53 which is shown as a function of @xmath6 in fig .
[ deriv]a , b for different @xmath2 .
the derivatives show a continuous rise towards low @xmath6 for fixed @xmath2 which is well described by the qcd fit to the h1 data down to @xmath54 gev@xmath5 .
the shape of @xmath53 reflects the behaviour of the gluon distribution in the associated kinematic range .
the rise of @xmath16 with decreasing @xmath6 can be characterised by @xmath55 where @xmath56 . in fig .
[ deriv]c , values of @xmath57 are shown from fits at fixed @xmath2 to the @xmath16 data .
the prominent rise of @xmath16 at large @xmath2 values is in agreement with the qcd fit@xcite . for smaller @xmath2 ,
the rise of @xmath16 becomes less steep and @xmath57 approaches a value of @xmath58 expected from the regge motivated fits@xcite .
the high precision of the data allows a simultaneous determination of the gluon distribution and the strong coupling constant @xmath59 in a next - to - leading - order ( nlo ) dglap@xcite qcd fit@xcite by combining the low@xmath6 cross section data of h1 with @xmath60 scattering data of the bcdms collaboration@xcite at large @xmath6 . the gluon distribution from this fit is shown in fig .
[ xg ] for @xmath2=5 , 20 , and 200 gev@xmath5 .
the inner error band represents the experimental uncertainty of the determination of @xmath61 for @xmath59 fixed .
the simultaneous determination of @xmath62 and @xmath59 leads to a small increase of the experimental error of @xmath63 as is illustrated by the middle error band .
the full error band includes in addition the uncertainties connected with the fit ansatz ( `` model uncertainty '' ) . the dglap analysis of the data leads to a gluon distribution which rises dramatically at small @xmath6 with increasing @xmath2 .
a value of the strong coupling constant @xmath64 = @xmath65 is obtained . the value of @xmath59 changes by about 0.005 , much more than the experimental error , if the renormalisation scale is allowed to vary by a factor of four in the fit .
this theoretical uncertainty is expected to be reduced significantly in next - to - next - to - leading - order ( nnlo ) perturbation theory .
( 0,0 ) ( 185,200)(a ) ( 408,200)(b ) exclusive channels such as charm or jet production via boson gluon fusion can also be used for a direct extraction of the gluon density . the charm contribution to @xmath16 , @xmath15 ,
is determined at hera using measurements of @xmath66 production and account for @xmath67 of @xmath16@xcite as shown in fig .
the @xmath15 results are in agreement with expectations calculated using the gluon momentum distribution as determined in the nlo qcd fit to the inclusive cross sections .
jet production data@xcite could be used to determine the gluon distribution using @xmath12 from other experiments , or determine the strong coupling constant @xmath12 using parton momentum distributions from global qcd fits . the resulting gluon distribution at the factorisation scale @xmath68 gev is shown in fig .
[ f2c]b and consistent with the gluon from the global qcd fits .
the results for @xmath12 from jet studies by h1 and zeus collaborations together with @xmath12 determined from scaling violations by h1 are shown in fig .
[ alphas ] in comparison with the world average@xcite .
( 0,0 ) ( 193,205)(a ) ( 404,205)(b ) ( 0,0 ) ( 35,200)(a ) ( 270,200)(b ) ( 0,0 ) ( 185,210)(a ) ( 408,210)(b ) purely electroweak effects become observable at hera in a region of very high @xmath2 comparable with the masses squared of the vector bosons @xmath29 and @xmath22 . especially interesting in this respect is the comparison of neutral and charged current cross sections@xcite shown in fig . [ dsdq2 ] . at low @xmath2 ,
the cross section of the cc process , which is due to exchange of the @xmath22 boson , is suppressed compared to that of the nc process due to the different propagator terms . at high @xmath69
, both cross sections are approaching each other manifesting the unification of the weak and electromagnetic forces .
electroweak effects are also visible in the comparison of the @xmath20 and @xmath19 nc cross sections .
due to @xmath29 exchange , at very high @xmath2 the nc cross section is predicted to be suppressed in @xmath19 and enhanced in @xmath20 interactions .
this effect becomes visible for @xmath701000 gev@xmath5 as shown in fig .
[ dsdq2]a , [ redsechix ] and agrees with the standard model prediction .
the difference of the nc @xmath19 and @xmath20 cross sections at large @xmath2 has been used to extract the structure function @xmath71 in the range @xmath72 and @xmath73 gev@xmath5 as shown in fig.[xf3 ] .
since at hera the dominant contribution to @xmath71 is due to photon-@xmath29 interference , the h1 collaboration evaluated the corresponding structure function @xmath74 . the result is shown in fig . [ xf3gz ] .
the integral @xmath75 is found to be consistent within experimental errors with theoretical expectation of 1.11@xcite .
the reduced cc cross sections , defined in analogy to the nc case as the cross section divided by @xmath76 with the fermi coupling constant @xmath77 , are shown in fig .
[ ccxsec]a .
the results are well described by the standard model expectations . at high @xmath6
the @xmath20 and @xmath19 cross sections are dominated by the valence quark contributions , @xmath78 and @xmath79 respectively . for points where the expected @xmath80 contribution to the total cross section is larger than 70%
a local extraction method@xcite is used to determine the valence quark densities : @xmath81 where @xmath82 is the measured nc or cc
@xmath83 double differential cross sections and the ratio is the theoretical expectation from the h1 97 pdf fit@xcite .
the extracted parton densities shown in fig .
[ ccxsec]b are rather independent of the theoretical input and are in agreement with global fits . within the standard model , cc interactions
are mediated by the @xmath84-channel exchange of a @xmath22 boson , and therefore are sensitive to the @xmath22 mass in the space - like regime .
the propagator mass @xmath85 is fitted to the double differential cc cross section data and yields for @xmath19 and @xmath20 respectively@xcite @xmath86 @xmath87 these values are consistent with direct measurements in the time - like domain from lep and tevatron .
the present tests of the standard model show good agreement of predictions of perturbative qcd and electroweak theory with the hera data .
the luminosity upgrade of the hera collider will bring the opportunity to improve the precision of such tests , especially for the electroweak sector at high @xmath2 where the precision of the measurements is still limited by statistics .
h1 collab . , c. adloff et al . ,
measurement of @xmath66 meson production and the charm contribution to the proton structure @xmath15 in deep inelastic scattering at hera , contrubuted paper to ichep 2000 , osaka , japan , july 2000 ; + zeus collab . ;
j.breitweg et al . , eur .
j. c12 ( 2000 ) 35 .
zeus collab . , measurement of high-@xmath2 neutral current cross section in @xmath20 dis and a first measurement of the structure function @xmath88 at hera ; + zeus collab . , measurement of high-@xmath2 charged current cross section in @xmath20 deep inelastic scattering at hera , contributed papers to ichep 2000 , osaka , japan , july 2000 .
|
understanding structure proton quarks gluons qcd dynamics established in lepton - proton electron - proton deep inelastic scattering hera @xmath23 collider electron - proton energy @xmath24=320 gev effects electroweak sector tested dis squared four momentum transfer @xmath25 @xmath26 @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 @xmath22 boson masses signals new arise highest @xmath2 proton structure probed smallest distances deep inelastic scattering depends on three variables @xmath2 @xmath6 @xmath30 @xmath31 fraction proton momentum struck quark @xmath33 inelasticity interaction variables related via @xmath34 electron - proton neutral charged current cross sections expressed three proton structure functions neutral current interactions @xmath35 or @xmath29 boson proton structure function @xmath9 proportional to quark momentum distributions charge @xmath10 sensitive to gluon momentum distribution @xmath36 related to valence quarks three functions measured at hera confronted with standard model predictionsgluon momentum distribution strong coupling @xmath12 qcd analysis hera cross checked in channels charm jet production boson gluon fusion propagator mass @xmath28 determined from @xmath2 dependence cc interactions compared with @xmath28 mass measurements @xmath37 @xmath38 interactions measurements at hera theory electroweak sector evolution parton densities perturbative qcd first @xmath16 measurements @xmath23 interactions hera luminosity 0.025 pb@xmath39 1992 rise of @xmath16 decreasing @xmath6 interest in qcd collected luminosity increased three orders magnitude h1 zeus detectors improved 1995/1996 new detector components drift chamber silicon tracker 1995 zeus installed beam pipe calorimeter 1997 beam pipe tracker angles scattered electron improvements increase luminosity measured region@xcite to low @xmath40@xmath5 transition region from dis photoproduction very high @xmath42 variable @xmath6 ranges to 0.65 in valence quark region @xmath43 measurements@xcite at hera fixed target experiments shown in fig .f2 function @xmath2 values @xmath6 h1 zeus data agree range hera experiments low @xmath44 hera data overlap fixed target experiments phase space precision data @xmath45 comparable fixed target experiments 185,200)(a 185,75)(b 250,180)(c 165,220)(a 400,100)(b results reduced nc cross section divided kinematical factor @xmath46 @xmath47 @xmath48 shown fig . redsec function @xmath6 @xmath49@xmath5 high @xmath30 @xmath50 lowest x points fixed @xmath2 turn over visible measured cross section due longitudinal structure function @xmath51 high - y cross sections @xmath51 extracted@xcite fig extends knowledge longitudinal structure function lower @xmath6 fixed target lepton - proton scattering experiments increase @xmath52 towards low @xmath6 consistent with qcd calculation rise gluon momentum distribution low @xmath6 gluon density derivative @xmath53 function @xmath6 fig . derivatives continuous rise towards low @xmath6 fixed @xmath2 qcd fit h1 data @xmath54@xmath5shape @xmath53 reflects gluon distribution range rise @xmath16 decreasing @xmath6 characterised by @xmath55 @xmath56 fig . values @xmath57 from @xmath2 to @xmath16 data rise @xmath16 at large @xmath2 values with qcd fit@xcite smaller @xmath2 rise less steep @xmath57 approaches @xmath58 fits high precision allows simultaneous determination gluon distribution strong coupling constant @xmath59 fit combining low@xmath6 cross data @xmath60 scattering data @xmath6 gluon distribution shown in fig . for @xmath2=5 20 200 gev@xmath5 inner error band represents experimental uncertainty determination @xmath61 for @xmath59 simultaneous determination @xmath62 @xmath59 increase experimental error @xmath63 middle error band full error band includes uncertainties fit ansatz uncertainty dglap analysis leads gluon distribution rises at small @xmath6 increasing @xmath2 strong coupling constant @xmath64 = @xmath65 value @xmath59 changes by 0.005 more than experimental error if renormalisation scale factor fourtheoretical uncertainty in perturbation theory 185,200)(a ) 408,200)(b ) exclusive channels charm jet production via boson gluon fusion for extraction gluon density charm contribution to @xmath16 determined at hera using @xmath66 production @xmath67 @xmath16@xcite @xmath15 results with expectations gluon momentum distribution nlo qcd jet production data determine gluon distribution @xmath12 strong coupling constant using parton momentum distributions global qcd fits resulting gluon distribution at factorisation scale @xmath68 gev fig . consistent with gluon global qcd fits results @xmath12 from jet studies h1 zeus scaling violations shown in fig . comparison world average@xcite 0,0 ) 193,205)(a ) ( 404,205)(b ) 35,200)(a ) 270,200)(b ) 185,210)(a 408,210)(b ) electroweak effects observable at hera high @xmath2 comparable with vector bosons @xmath29 @xmath22 comparison of neutral charged current cross sections@xcite fig .low @xmath2 cross section cc process due exchange @xmath22 boson suppressed nc process different propagator terms high @xmath69 cross sections unification weak electromagnetic forces electroweak effects visible @xmath20 @xmath19 nc cross sections @xmath29 exchange high @xmath2 nc cross section suppressed @xmath19 enhanced @xmath20 interactions effect visible @xmath701000 gev@xmath5 fig agrees standard model prediction difference nc @xmath19 @xmath20 cross sections @xmath2 extract structure function @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 gev@xmath5 dominant contribution @xmath71 photon-@xmath29 interference h1 collaboration evaluated structure function @xmath74 result fig . integral @xmath75 consistent experimental errors theoretical expectation 1.11@xcite reduced cc cross sections divided @xmath76 fermi coupling constant @xmath77 shown fig . results described standard model expectations high @xmath6 @xmath20 @xmath19 cross sections dominated valence quark contributions @xmath78 @xmath79expected @xmath80 contribution cross section larger than 70% local extraction method@xcite valence quark densities @xmath81 @xmath82 measured nc cc @xmath83 double differential cross sections ratio theoretical expectation from h1 97 pdf fit@xcite extracted parton densities fig . independent of theoretical input agreement with global fits standard model cc interactions mediated by @xmath84-channel exchange @xmath22 boson sensitive to @xmath22 mass space - like regime propagator mass @xmath85 fitted to double differential cc cross section data yields @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath86 @xmath87 values consistent with measurements time - like domain lep tevatron tests standard model show agreement predictions perturbative qcd electroweak theory hera data luminosity upgrade hera collider precision electroweak sector high @xmath2 limited adloff measurement @xmath66 meson production contribution proton structure @xmath15 deep inelastic scattering hera measurement high-@xmath2 neutral current cross section @xmath20 dis measurement structure function @xmath88 at herameasurement@xmath2 cross section @xmath20 scattering contributed papers ichep 2000 osaka japan july
| 0.495054
| 3,115
| 1,656
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,398
|
we study whether the neutron skin thickness @xmath0 of @xmath1pb originates from the bulk or from the surface of the neutron and proton density distributions in mean field models .
we find that the size of the bulk contribution to @xmath0 of @xmath1pb strongly depends on the slope of the nuclear symmetry energy , while the surface contribution does not .
we note that most mean field models predict a neutron density for @xmath1pb between the halo and skin type limits .
we investigate the dependence of parity - violating electron scattering at the kinematics of the prex experiment on the shape of the nucleon densities predicted by the mean field models for @xmath1pb .
we find an approximate formula for the parity - violating asymmetry in terms of the central radius and the surface diffuseness of the nucleon densities of @xmath1pb in these models .
* study of the neutron skin thickness of @xmath2pb in mean field models * x. roca - maza@xmath3 , m. centelles@xmath4 , x. vias@xmath4 and m. warda@xmath5 * @xmath4departament destructura i constituents de la matria and institut de cincies del cosmos , facultat de fsica , universitat de barcelona , diagonal _ 647 _ , _ 08028 _ barcelona , spain . * @xmath6infn , sezione di milano , via celoria 16 , i-_20133 _ milano , italy . * @xmath7katedra fizyki teoretycznej , uniwersytet marii curie skodowskiej , ul .
radziszewskiego 10 , 20 - 031 lublin , poland .
|
the neutron skin thickness of nuclei is defined as the difference between the root mean square radius of neutrons and protons , @xmath8 the extraction of neutron radii and neutron skins from the experiment is in general dependent on the shape of the neutron distribution used in the analysis @xcite .
the data typically do not indicate unambiguosly if the difference between the peripheral neutron and proton densities is caused by an extended bulk radius of the neutron density , by a modification of the width of the surface , or by some combination of both effects .
in particular , the neutron skin @xmath0 of @xmath1pb is nowadays attracting significant interest in both experiment and theory since it has a close relation with the density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy and with the equation of state of neutron - rich matter @xcite , which have a large impact in diverse problems of nuclear physics and astrophysics where neutron - rich matter is involved @xcite .
the analysis of bulk and surface contributions to the neutron skin thickness of a nucleus requires proper definitions of these quantities based on nuclear density distributions @xcite . using the standard definitions of the equivalent sharp radius @xmath9 and surface width parameter @xmath10 of a nucleon density profile , we have shown in refs .
@xcite that one can write @xmath11 , where @xmath12 and @xmath13 we recall that @xmath14 stands for the radius of a uniform sharp distribution whose density equals the bulk value of the actual density and that has the same number of particles .
therefore , one has a natural splitting of @xmath0 in terms of a bulk part ( [ rb ] ) independent of surface properties , and a part ( [ rs ] ) of surface origin @xcite .
nonrelativistic ( nrmf ) and relativistic ( rmf ) mean field models often differ in their predictions for properties of asymmetric nuclear matter .
a common example is the value predicted for the density slope @xmath15 of the nuclear symmetry energy at saturation density , which may show large discrepancies in the mf interactions .
the @xmath15 parameter is defined as @xmath16 where @xmath17 is the symmetry energy and @xmath18 the nuclear saturation density .
linear correlation of @xmath0 of @xmath1pb with the density slope of the nuclear symmetry energy @xmath15 .
the dependence on @xmath15 of the bulk and surface contributions defined in eqs .
( [ rb ] ) and ( [ rs ] ) is also displayed . ] in figure [ fig2 ] we show the linear correlation of @xmath0 of @xmath1pb with the parameter @xmath15 and demonstrate that it mainly arises from the bulk part of @xmath0 within a large and representative set of mean field models of very different nature .
relativistic ( rmf ) models : g2 , nlc , nl - sh , tm1 , nl - ra1 , nl3 , nl3 * , nl - z , nl1 , dd - me2 and fsugold ; and nonrelativistic ( nrmf ) models : hfb-8 , msk7 , d1s , sgii , d1n , sk - t6 , hfb-17 , sly4 , skm * , sksm * , skmp , ska , sk - rs and sk - t4 .
the original references to the different interactions can be found in @xcite for the skyrme models , @xcite for the gogny models , and @xcite and ref . [
19 ] in @xcite for the rmf models . from this figure
, one sees that whereas the bulk contribution to the neutron skin thickness of @xmath2pb changes largely among the different mean - field interactions , the surface contribution remains confined to a narrow band of values .
the shape of the neutron density is more uncertain than the proton density in @xmath1pb , and even if the neutron rms radius is determined ( _ e.g. _ in prex @xcite ) , it can correspond to different shapes of the neutron density . as discussed in @xcite , from the study of the two - parameter fermi functions fitted to the self - consistent densities of the mf models , we find that for @xmath2pb the central radii @xmath19 vary within the windows @xmath20 fm in nrmf and @xmath21 fm in rmf , @xmath22 fm in nrmf and @xmath23 fm in rmf , and that the diffuseness parameters @xmath24 vary within the windows @xmath25 fm in nrmf and @xmath26 fm in rmf and @xmath27 fm . from these results
, we can conclude that most of the mf models predict a neutron distribution for @xmath1pb between the halo - type limit ( where @xmath28 ) and the skin - type limit ( where @xmath29 ) .
the halo - type is supported by models with a very soft symmetry energy .
models with a stiffer symmetry energy ( larger @xmath15 values ) have @xmath30 more and more different from zero .
however , a pure skin - type is not found in any mean - field model as @xmath31 is always non - vanishing .
parity violating asymmetry ( dwba ) in @xmath1pb for 1 gev electrons at @xmath32 scattering angle .
mf results and those obtained with the parametrized formula given in the text . ]
parity - violating electron scattering ( pves ) probes the neutron density in a nucleus since the @xmath33 boson couples mainly to neutrons @xcite .
the prex experiment at jlab @xcite aims to determine the neutron rms radius of @xmath1pb by pves .
we have investigated the dependence of pves on the shape of the neutron and proton densities of @xmath1pb within the mf models . to this end , we compute the parity - violating asymmetry @xmath34 at the prex kinematics @xcite .
we obtain the differentical cross sections @xmath35 for right and left - handed electrons by performing the exact phase shift analysis ( dbwa ) of the dirac equation @xcite for incident electrons moving in the potentials @xmath36 @xcite .
see ref .
@xcite for the details of the calculations .
we display in fig .
[ fig4 ] the results for @xmath37 as a function of @xmath30 and @xmath31 of the two parameter fermi distributions fitted to the @xmath1pb mf densities .
we have found that the results can be reasonably parametrized by the formula @xmath38 with @xmath39 , @xmath40 @xmath41 and @xmath42 @xmath41 , which is depicted by the crosses in the figure .
recently , in @xcite we have analyzed systematically the correlations of @xmath37 with the neutron skin thickness of @xmath1pb and with the slope of the symmetry energy in the nuclear mf models .
we have found that the known linear correlation of @xmath0 of @xmath1pb with the density derivative of the nuclear symmetry energy arises from the bulk part of @xmath0 .
this implies that an experimental determination of @xmath43 of @xmath1pb could be as useful for constraining @xmath15 as a determination of @xmath44 .
mf models can accomodate the halo - type distribution in @xmath1pb if the symmetry energy is very soft but do not support a purely skin - type distribution .
we find a simple parametrization of @xmath37 in terms of @xmath30 and @xmath31 that would provide a new correlation between the central radius and the surface diffuseness of the distribution of neutrons in @xmath1pb assuming the proton density known from experiment .
work partially supported by grants csd2007 - 00042 , fis2008 - 01661 and 2009sgr-1289 ( spain ) and n202 231137 ( poland ) .
|
neutron skin thickness of nuclei defined as difference between root mean square radius of neutrons and protons extraction of neutron radii skins on shape neutron distribution data indicate if difference between peripheral neutron proton densities caused by extended bulk radius density modification of width surface or combination of both effects neutron skin of @xmath1pb interest with density dependence nuclear symmetry energy equation of state of neutron - rich matter in problems nuclear physics astrophysics analysis of bulk surface contributions to neutron skin thickness requires definitions based on nuclear density distributions standard definitions of equivalent sharp radius surface width parameter of nucleon density profile can @xmath14 stands for radius of uniform sharp distribution density equals bulk value of actual density same number of particles natural splitting of @xmath0 in terms bulk part ( rb ) independent of surface properties part ( rs ] of surface origin nonrelativistic and relativistic mean field models differ in predictions for properties of asymmetric nuclear matterexample value density slope @xmath15 nuclear symmetry energy at saturation density discrepancies in mf interactions @xmath15 parameter defined as @xmath16 @xmath17 symmetry energy @xmath18 nuclear saturation density linear correlation of @xmath0 @xmath1pb with density slope nuclear symmetry energy @xmath15 dependence on @xmath15 of bulk surface contributions in eqs rb rs displayed figure linear correlation of @xmath0 @xmath1pb with @xmath15 arises from bulk part @xmath0 mean field models relativistic models g2 nlc nl - sh tm1 - ra1 nl3 - z - me2 fsugold nonrelativistic models hfb-8 msk7 d1s sgii d1n sk - t6 hfb-17 sly4 skm * skmp ska sk - rs - t4 original references to interactions in @xcite skyrme gogny models rmf models bulk contribution to neutron skin thickness of @xmath2pb changes among field interactions surface contribution narrow band valuesneutron density uncertain than proton density in @xmath1pb even if neutron rms radius determined can correspond to different shapes neutron density study of two - parameter fermi functions - densities mf models for @xmath2pb central radii @xmath19 vary diffuseness parameters @xmath24 vary mf models predict neutron distribution for @xmath1pb between halo - type limit and skin - type limit ) halo - type supported by models with soft symmetry energy models with stiffer symmetry energy have @xmath30 different from zero pure skin - type not found in mean - field model as @xmath31 non - vanishing parity violating asymmetry ( dwba ) in @xmath1pb for 1 gev electrons at @xmath32 scattering angle parity - violating electron scattering probes neutron density in nucleus since @xmath33 boson couples to neutrons prex experiment at jlab @xcite aims to determine neutron rms radius of @xmath1pb by pvesinvestigated dependence pves on neutron proton densities @xmath1pb mf models compute parity - violating asymmetry @xmath34 prex kinematics @xcite obtain differentical cross sections @xmath35 for right left - handed electrons phase shift analysis dirac equation electrons potentials @xmath36 details calculations display fig results @xmath37 function @xmath30 @xmath31 parameter fermi distributions @xmath1pb mf densities results parametrized by formula @xmath38 with @xmath39 depicted crosses figure analyzed correlations @xmath37 with neutron skin thickness @xmath1pb slope symmetry energy nuclear mf models linear correlation @xmath0 @xmath1pb with density derivative nuclear symmetry energy arises from bulk part @xmath0 experimental determination @xmath43 @xmath1pb constraining @xmath15 @xmath44 mf models accomodate halo - type distribution in @xmath1pb if symmetry energy soft support purely skin - type distributionparametrization @xmath37 new correlation central radius surface diffuseness distribution neutrons @xmath1pb assuming proton density supported grants csd2007 - 00042 fis2008 - 01661 2009sgr-1289 spain n202 231137 poland
| 0.30846
| 1,710
| 853
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,417
|
it is demonstrated that improved entrainment control of chaotic systems can maintain periodic goal dynamics near unstable periodic orbits without feedback .
the method is based on the optimization of goal trajectories and leads to small open - loop control forces .
|
in recent years , a large number of investigations has been made into the control of chaotic dynamics , and many techniques have been applied in simulations and experiments ( see , for instance , @xcite for an overview ) .
two techniques have been proposed for an _ open - loop _ control of chaos .
the first approach is related to vibrational methods , as a scalar periodic perturbation is applied to the chaotic system . usually , the control signals are sinusoidal @xcite or two - mode forces @xcite .
recently it has been shown that the method can be improved by use of optimized multimode signals which are more complex @xcite .
the second method uses equations of motion and a specific goal dynamics to derive vector control forces .
if the goal trajectory is suitably chosen , the chaotic system under control converges to the goal .
therefore , this method is often referred to as entrainment control @xcite . in this paper
it is shown how entrainment control can be improved with respect to small control forces . for this purpose ,
a specific property of chaotic systems is exploited : dense unstable periodic orbits ( upos ) .
in fact , upos are common goal orbits of most feedback techniques employed for control of chaos ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) .
because a upo is a natural , but unstable motion of the system , control forces have to be applied only for transfer to and stabilization of the orbit . in the ideal
( noiseless ) case , the stabilization forces tend to zero once the upo is actually reached .
therefore , feedback control of upos can be maintained with very small forces in low noise systems . despite the power of such methods , however ,
there are situations where one wants to or has to dispense with a feedback from the system . then , open - loop techniques are needed .
while there exists a theory for open - loop stabilization of unstable fixed points ( vibrational control , see @xcite ) , a counterpart for stabilization of unstable periodic orbits is still lacking to the author s knowledge .
although it is supposed that the scalar periodic perturbation methods mentioned above usually stabilize periodic dynamics in the vicinity of upos , this has not been shown yet explicitly . the underlying mechanism , possibly some resonance phenomenon , as well as the exact final dynamics are still unknown .
this is different for entrainment control , where the appropriate dynamics is given _ a priori _ , and which is described in the following .
we start with a nonlinear dynamical system in the continuous time domain , which is influenced by a control signal vector .
the equations of motion are supposed to be known , according to the ordinary differential equation @xmath0 with the system state @xmath1 in the state space @xmath2 , the control vector @xmath3 in the control signal space @xmath4 and the vector field @xmath5 .
let @xmath6 be a goal dynamics generated by a vector field @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 . to introduce the goal dynamics as solutions of eq .
( [ e1 ] ) , we have to apply forces @xmath10 which solve the equation @xmath11 thus , the vector field @xmath12 is simply changed to @xmath7 by the control forces .
to do this , however , feedback from the system is necessary , as the actual system state @xmath13 appears in eq .
( [ e3 ] ) .
the main point of the entrainment control method is to eliminate @xmath13 by the assumption that the system is already located in the initial goal state @xmath14 when the control is started at @xmath15 .
if so , the correct control signal @xmath10 is given by the solution of the equation @xmath16 equation ( [ e4 ] ) can be solved without any system state measurement ; in fact , not even a generating vector field @xmath7 has to be given : it is sufficient to know the goal trajectory itself and its time derivative ( velocity ) for the control time interval , @xmath17}$ ] .
there are several conditions that have to be fulfilled to make the entrainment control scheme work .
first of all , eq . ( [ e4 ] ) has to be solvable for @xmath10 .
this is trivially true for simple vector additive forces : @xmath18 we restrict our discussion to such forces , which are the most common in the literature on entrainment control .
however , problems immediately arise if , e.g. , the control space dimension @xmath19 is less than the state space dimension @xmath20 ( a treatment of general control influence with @xmath19=@xmath21 can be found in @xcite ) .
the next condition to be satisfied is asymptotic stability of the goal trajectory . while control forces according to eq .
( [ e4 ] ) ensure that the goal trajectory is a solution of the controlled system eq .
( [ e1 ] ) , there is no statement about whether nearby located system states are attracted by it in other words , whether entrainment occurs in a vicinity of @xmath22 according to @xmath23 .
even if this is the case , one needs a large basin of attraction ( ideally the whole phase space ) to make the method work for a large set of possible initial states distant from @xmath22 .
statements about basins are very hard to find ( compare @xcite ) , but a discussion of stability can more easily be made . for simple vector additive control , eq .
( [ e5 ] ) , we call all points in phase space where all eigenvalues of the jacobian of @xmath24 have negative real part , _ convergent regions _ ( see also @xcite )
. goal trajectories entirely located in convergent regions turn out to be asymptotically stable , if their time derivative @xmath25 is sufficiently bounded .
because of the stated stability aspects , goal trajectories are usually chosen to be located in convergent regions .
this results in a typical drawback of the method : due to very little overlap of convergent regions and unperturbed chaotic attractor , such a goal dynamics is quite different to the natural system dynamics .
consequently , the system is strongly altered by control , and control forces are large .
in fact , they have to be of about the magnitude of the velocities appearing in the uncontrolled system in order to pull the movement into convergent regions .
to attack this problem , one has to realize that location in convergent regions is not a necessary condition for stability of a goal trajectory .
the resulting dynamics of chaotic systems controlled by periodic perturbation methods indeed suggest that stable dynamics can also be achieved in the chaotic attractor region , especially near a upo .
control forces are smaller then , as the natural dynamics is only slightly altered .
an extreme case would be to consider a upo itself as a goal for entrainment control : we get zero control forces according to eq .
( [ e4 ] ) .
however , such a goal is of course unstable .
it has to be at least slightly changed to result in a stable one . to this end
, a family of deformations of a upo is considered in the following .
let @xmath26 denote a known upo of the chaotic system with period @xmath27=@xmath28 .
we chose a finite fourier series as a deformation @xmath29 , and also include a linear time transformation by a factor @xmath30 .
the family of goal trajectories now reads @xmath31 it is parametrized by @xmath32 and the fourier coefficient vectors @xmath33 , @xmath34 .
since @xmath35 has no effect on @xmath22 , a deformation ( or a goal ) is characterized by a total of @xmath36 real numbers .
now , we formulate the determination of advantageous deformation parameters that lead to a stable goal trajectory with small control forces as an optimization problem . a real number according to a cost function
is assigned to each probed set of parameters .
the cost assesses the stability of the chosen goal trajectory ( which is determined numerically ) as well as the magnitude of the resulting control forces : @xmath37 & \mu < 1 , \\ \|{\bf u}(t)\|_{max } + \gamma [ \exp(\mu)-1 ] + c & \mu \ge 1 \end{array } \right.\ ] ] here , @xmath38 is the maximum absolute value of the characteristic ( floquet ) multipliers of the goal orbit .
these are well defined , as the goal is periodic , and they are calculated by integration of the variational equations @xcite .
instability is indicated by @xmath39 and causes high cost via a large positive penalty term @xmath40 .
the cost function further includes an @xmath41 and the maximum norm of the resulting forces .
the weight of stability with respect to magnitude of forces can be adjusted by @xmath42 .
the global minimum of the cost function in the deformation parameter space corresponds to the best goal trajectory in sense of the chosen balance between stability and small forces . for various reasons ,
a direct analytic treatment of the given optimization problem is usually not possible : the upo is not known in analytic form , a direct expression for stability of a deformed upo is missing ( the variational equations have to be integrated ) , and the cost function is not continuous .
consequently , numerical methods are employed .
the upo is represented by a periodic cubic spline interpolation , and @xmath43 is calculated via numerical integration of the variational equations .
the optimization is done by a numerical technique that can handle high - dimensional problems with rough and rapidly varying cost functions . for this purpose , the stochastically guided algorithm amebsa from @xcite
was chosen ; this is a combination of simulated annealing and the downhill simplex method .
in this section , the control of a chaotic lorenz system is demonstrated . the equations with vector additive control read @xmath44 where time dependence of the forces is explicitly written .
a given periodic goal trajectory @xmath45}$ ] yields control forces according to eq .
( [ e5 ] ) .
parameters of the lorenz system are set to @xmath46 , @xmath47 , and @xmath48 .
the resulting chaotic attractor is shown in fig .
[ fig1](a ) . an embedded upo which corresponds to @xmath49 in eq .
( [ e7 ] ) is given in fig .
[ fig1](b ) by the interrupted line .
the deformation is defined by five fourier modes ( @xmath50=5 ) which leads to a 34-dimensional search space for optimization ; @xmath42 is set to 5 , @xmath40 to 100 in eq .
( [ e8 ] ) .
the best result of several optimization runs is shown in fig .
[ fig1](b ) by the solid line .
it is a stable goal trajectory and therefore a stable periodic orbit ( spo ) of the controlled system .
the actual values of deformation parameters can be found in tab .
[ tab1 ] together with additional data of the upo and the spo .
the deformation lies in the range of some percent , and it is plotted in fig .
[ fig2](a ) .
the resulting forces , shown in fig .
[ fig2](b ) , change the vector field of the chaotic system less than about 10% .
this is an improvement of more than a magnitude if compared to goals in convergent regions @xcite .
numerical tests indicated that the spo is globally asymptotically stable ; the basin is the whole phase space . however , transient times until control is established depend strongly on the initial state , and range from just a few up to a few hundred control periods . a typical behavior is presented in fig . [ fig3 ] .
after control is turned on , an intermittent transient appears .
finally , the system settles down on the desired goal orbit , which is maintained .
it has been shown how open - loop entrainment control in the vicinity of unstable periodic orbits can be realized .
the search for suitable goal trajectories has been formulated in terms of an optimization problem with respect to upo deformations .
feasibility has been demonstrated in an example , where a chaotic lorenz system has been successfully controlled to an optimized distortion of a upo .
the locations of such goal orbits are independent of convergent regions , and thus the required forces are small compared to hitherto used goal dynamics far from the chaotic attractor .
.[tab1 ] coordinates @xmath51 give a point of the original upo of the lorenz system , @xmath27 its period .
maximum absolute values of the floquet multipliers are given by @xmath43 for the upo and for the optimized deformation ( spo ) .
parameters of the spo are the time transformation coefficient @xmath30 and fourier coefficients @xmath52 , @xmath53 .
subscripts of numbers indicate a decimal shift , i.e. , @xmath54 stands for @xmath55 . [ cols="<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] 99 chen , g. and dong , x. ( 1993 ) from chaos to order perspectives and methodologies in controlling chaotic nonlinear dynamical systems , _ int .
j. of bifurcation and chaos _ * 3*(6 ) , 1363 - 1409 .
alekseev , v.v and loskutov , a.yu .
( 1987 ) _ dokl .
. sssr _ * 293 * ; lima , r. and pettini , m. ( 1989 ) _ phys .
rev . a _ * 41 * ; azevedo , a. and rezende , s.m .
( 1991 ) _ phys .
* 66 * ; braiman , y. and goldhirsch , i. ( 1989 ) _ phys .
lett . _ * 66 * ; fronzoni , l. _ et al . _
( 1991 ) _ phys .
a _ * 43*. salerno , m. ( 1991 ) _ phys .
b _ * 44 * ; farrelly , d. and milligan , j.a . (
1993 ) _ phys .
e _ * 47 * ; cicogna , g. and fronzoni , l. ( 1993 ) _ phys .
e _ * 47*. mettin , r. and kurz , t. ( 1995 ) optimized periodic control of chaotic systems , _ phys .
a _ * 206 * , 331 - 339 .
hbler , a. and lscher , e. ( 1989 ) _ naturwissenschaften _ * 76 * ; plapp , b.b . and hbler , a. ( 1990 ) _ phys . rev
. lett . _ * 65 * ; jackson , e.a .
( 1990 ) _ physica d _ * 50 * ; shermer , r. _ et al . _
( 1991 ) _ phys .
a _ * 43 * ; breeden , j.l .
( 1994 ) _ phys .
a _ * 190*. ott , e. , grebogi , c. , and yorke , y.a .
( 1990 ) controlling chaos , _ phys .
* 64 * , 1196 - 1199 .
bellman , r.e . ,
bentsman , j. , and meerkov , s.m .
( 1986 ) vibrational control of nonlinear systems : vibrational stabilizability , _ ieee trans .
_ * ac-31 * , 710 - 716 .
mettin , r. , hbler , a. , scheeline , a. , and lauterborn , w. ( 1995 ) parametric entrainment control of chaotic systems , _ phys .
e _ * 51 * , 4065 - 4075 .
jackson , e.a .
( 1991 ) controls of dynamic flows with attractors , _ phys .
a. _ * 44 * , 48394853 .
parker t.s . and chua , l.o .
( 1989 ) _ practical numerical algorithms for chaotic systems _ , springer - verlag , new york .
press , w.h . ,
teukolsky , s.a . , vetterling , w.t . and flannery , b.r .
( 1992 ) _ numerical recipes in c _ , 2nd ed . , cambridge university press , cambridge
|
recent years investigations control chaotic dynamics techniques applied in simulations experiments see @xcite two techniques proposed for open - loop control chaos first approach related to vibrational methods scalar periodic perturbation applied to chaotic system control signals are sinusoidal or two - mode forces method improved by optimized multimode signals complex second method uses equations of motion specific goal dynamics derive vector control forces if goal trajectory chosen chaotic system under control converges to goal method referred as entrainment control @xcite paper shown entrainment control improved with small control forces specific property chaotic systems exploited dense unstable periodic orbits ( upos ) upos common goal orbits of feedback techniques for control chaos @xcite upo natural unstable motion control forces applied for transfer to stabilization orbit stabilization forces zero once upo reached feedback control of upos maintained with small forces in low noise systems situations where dispense with feedback system open - loop techniques needed theory for open - loop stabilization of unstable fixed points vibrational control counterpart for stabilization unstable periodic orbits lackingscalar periodic perturbation methods stabilize dynamics upos not shown underlying mechanism resonance phenomenon exact final dynamics unknown different for entrainment control appropriate dynamics given a priori described start with nonlinear dynamical system in continuous time domain influenced by control signal vector equations of motion known ordinary differential equation @xmath0 system state @xmath1 space @xmath2 control vector @xmath3 signal space @xmath4 vector field @xmath5 @xmath6 be goal dynamics generated by vector field @xmath7 to introduce goal dynamics solutions apply forces @xmath10 solve equation @xmath11 vector field @xmath12 changed to @xmath7 by control forces feedback from system necessary system state @xmath13 appears in eq . e3 entrainment control method eliminate @xmath13 system in initial goal state @xmath14 when control started at @xmath15 correct control signal @xmath10 solution of equation @xmath16 solved without system state measurement not generating vector field @xmath7 sufficient to know goal trajectory time derivative velocity ) for control time interval @xmath17conditions entrainment control scheme eq . ( [ e4 ] ) solvable for @xmath10 true for simple vector additive forces discussion to common problems arise if control space dimension @xmath19 less than state space dimension @xmath20 @xmath19=@xmath21 in @xcite next condition asymptotic stability of goal trajectory control forces eq . ( [ e4 ] ) ensure goal trajectory solution of controlled system no statement about nearby system states attracted entrainment @xmath22 @xmath23 needs large basin of attraction whole phase space ) method for initial states distant from @xmath22 statements about basins hard to find @xcite discussion of stability easily for simple vector additive control eq . ( [ e5 ] ) call all points in phase space where eigenvalues of jacobian of @xmath24 have negative real part convergent regions _ goal trajectories in convergent regions asymptotically stable if time derivative @xmath25 sufficiently bounded goal trajectories usually in convergent regionsresults drawback method little overlap convergent regions unperturbed chaotic attractor goal dynamics different to natural system dynamics system altered by control control forces large about magnitude of velocities uncontrolled system to pull movement into convergent regions location in convergent regions not necessary for stability goal trajectory dynamics chaotic systems controlled periodic perturbation suggest stable dynamics in chaotic attractor region especially near upo control forces smaller natural dynamics slightly altered extreme upo as goal for entrainment control zero control forces goal unstable to slightly changed family of deformations of upo considered @xmath26 known upo system period @xmath27=@xmath28 chose finite fourier series as deformation @xmath29 linear time transformation by factor @xmath30 family of goal trajectories reads @xmath31 parametrized by @xmath32 fourier coefficient vectors @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 no effect on @xmath22 deformation characterized by @xmath36 real numbers formulate determination of advantageous deformation parameters stable goal trajectory with small control forces optimization problem real number according to cost function assigned to each set parameterscost assesses stability goal trajectory determined numerically magnitude control forces : @xmath37 \mu < 1 } +\gamma [ \exp(\mu)-1 ] + c \mu \ge 1 {array @xmath38 maximum value characteristic multipliers goal orbit goal periodic calculated by integration variational equations @xcite instability indicated by @xmath39 causes high cost large positive penalty term @xmath40 cost function includes @xmath41 maximum norm forces weight stability adjusted by @xmath42 global minimum cost function deformation parameter space corresponds to best goal trajectory stability forces direct analytic treatment optimization not possible upo not known direct expression for stability deformed upo missing equations cost function not continuous numerical methods employed upo represented by periodic cubic spline interpolation @xmath43 calculated via numerical integration variational equations optimization by numerical technique high - dimensional problems varying cost functions stochastically guided algorithm amebsa from @xcite chosen combination of simulated annealing downhill simplex method control of chaotic lorenz system demonstratedequations with vector additive control read @xmath44 time dependence forces written periodic goal trajectory @xmath45 yields control forces parameters lorenz system set to @xmath46 @xmath48 resulting chaotic attractor shown in fig (a embedded upo corresponds to @xmath49 given in fig(b interrupted line deformation defined by five fourier modes @xmath50=5 leads to 34-dimensional search space for optimization @xmath42 set to 5 @xmath40 to 100 best result of optimization runs shown in fig(b solid line stable goal trajectory stable periodic orbit of controlled system values deformation parameters in tab additional data upo spo deformation range percent plotted in fig fig2](a ) resulting forces change vector field chaotic system less than 10% improvement magnitude compared to goals convergent regions tests spo globally asymptotically stable basin is whole phase space transient times until control established depend on initial state range few hundred control periods typical behavior in fig fig3 after control turned on intermittent transient appearssystem settles on desired goal orbit maintained shown open - loop entrainment control unstable periodic orbits search for goal trajectories optimization problem upo deformations feasibility demonstrated in chaotic lorenz system controlled to optimized distortion upo locations goal orbits independent of convergent regions required forces small compared to goal dynamics far from chaotic attractor coordinates @xmath51 give point original upo lorenz system @xmath27 period maximum values floquet multipliers by @xmath43 for upo optimized deformation spo parameters are time transformation coefficient @xmath30 fourier coefficients @xmath52 @xmath53 subscripts indicate decimal shift @xmath54 stands for @xmath55 chen , g. dong , x. ( 1993 ) chaos to order perspectives controlling chaotic nonlinear dynamical systems int . j. of bifurcation chaos 1363 - 1409 alekseev loskutov 1987 ) 293 lima pettini 1989 ) phys . rev 41 azevedo rezende 1991 ) 66 braiman goldhirsch 1989 phys66 * fronzoni l. 1991 ) . 43* salerno m 1991 phys 44 farrelly d. milligan j 1993 phys 47 cicogna g. fronzoni l 1993 47 mettin r kurz t 1995 optimized periodic control chaotic systems phys 206 * 331 - 339 hbler a. lscher e. 1989 ) naturwissenschaften 76 * plapp b.b hbler a. 1990 ) phys . 65 * jackson e 1990 50 * shermer r 1991 43 * breeden j.l 1994 190* ott e. grebogi c yorke y 1990 controlling chaos . 64 * 1196 - 1199 bellman r bentsman j meerkov s 1986 vibrational control nonlinear systems stabilizability ac-31 * 710 - 716 mettin r hbler scheeline lauterborn w 1995 parametric entrainment control chaotic systems . 51 * 4065 - 4075 jackson e1991 controls dynamic flows attractors . a 44 48394853 parker t chua l.o 1989 practical numerical algorithms chaotic systems springer - verlag new york press teukolsky vetterling flannery b.r 1992 numerical recipes c 2nd ed cambridge university press
| 0.573165
| 3,529
| 1,777
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,421
|
guruswami and indyk showed in @xcite that forney s error exponent can be achieved with linear coding complexity over binary symmetric channels .
this paper extends this conclusion to general discrete - time memoryless channels and shows that forney s and blokh - zyablov error exponents can be arbitrarily approached by one - level and multi - level concatenated codes with linear encoding / decoding complexity . the key result is a revision to forney s general minimum distance decoding algorithm , which enables a low complexity integration of guruswami - indyk s outer codes into the concatenated coding schemes
. coding complexity , concatenated code , error exponent
|
consider communication over a discrete - time memoryless channel modeled by a conditional point mass function ( pmf ) or probability density function ( pdf ) @xmath0 , where @xmath1 and @xmath2 are the input and output symbols , @xmath3 and @xmath4 are the input and output alphabets , respectively .
let @xmath5 be the shannon capacity .
fano showed in @xcite that the minimum error probability @xmath6 for block channel codes of rate @xmath7 and length @xmath8 is bounded by @xmath9 where @xmath10 is a positive function of channel transition probabilities , known as the error exponent . for finite input and output alphabets , without coding complexity constraint , the maximum achievable @xmath10 is given by gallager in @xcite , @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the input distribution , and @xmath13 is given for different values of @xmath7 as follows , @xmath14 the definitions of other variables in ( [ gallagere1 ] ) can be found in @xcite .
if we replace the pmf by pdf , the summations by integrals and the @xmath15 operators by @xmath16 in ( [ gallagere ] ) , ( [ gallagere1 ] ) , the maximum achievable error exponent for continuous channels , i.e. , channels whose input and/or output alphabets are the set of real numbers @xcite , is still given by ( [ gallagere ] ) . in @xcite ,
forney proposed a one - level concatenated coding scheme , which can achieve the following error exponent , known as forney s exponent , for any rate @xmath17 with a complexity of @xmath18 .
@xmath19}(1-r_o)e\left ( \frac{r}{r_o}\right ) , \label{ecr}\ ] ] where @xmath20 and @xmath7 are the outer and the overall rates , respectively .
forney s coding scheme concatenates a maximum distance separable ( mds ) outer error - correction code with well performed inner channel codes . to achieve @xmath21 , the decoder is required to exploit reliability information from the inner codes using a general minimum distance ( gmd ) decoding algorithm @xcite .
forney s gmd algorithm essentially carries out outer code decoding , under various conditions , for @xmath22 times .
the overall decoding complexity of @xmath18 is due to the fact that the outer code ( which is a reed - solomon code ) used in @xcite has a decoding complexity of @xmath23 .
forney s concatenated codes were generalized to multi - level concatenated codes , also known as the generalized concatenated codes , by blokh and zyablov in @xcite .
as the order of concatenation goes to infinity , the error exponent approaches the following blokh - zyablov bound ( or blokh - zyablov error exponent ) @xcite@xcite .
@xmath24}}\left ( \frac{r}{r_o}-r\right)\left [ \int^{\frac{r}{r_o}}_0\frac{dx}{e_l(x , p_x)}\right ] ^{-1}.\ ] ] in @xcite , guruswami and indyk proposed a family of linear - time encodable / decodable nearly mds error - correction codes . by concatenating these codes ( as outer codes ) with _ fixed - lengthed _ binary inner codes , together with justesen s gmd algorithm @xcite , forney s error exponent was shown to be achievable over binary symmetric channels ( bscs ) with a complexity of @xmath22 @xcite , i.e. , linear in the codeword length .
the number of outer code decodings required by justesen s gmd algorithm is only a constant , as opposed to @xmath22 in forney s case @xcite .
since each outer code decoding has a complexity of @xmath22 , upper - bounding the number of outer code decodings by a constant is required for achieving the overall linear complexity . because justesen s gmd algorithm assumes binary channel outputs
@xcite@xcite , achievability of forney s exponent was only proven for bscs in ( * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* theorem 8) . in this paper
, we show that forney s gmd algorithm can be revised to carry out outer code decoding for only a constant number of times . with the help of the revised gmd algorithm , by using guruswami - indyk s outer codes with fixed - lengthed inner codes ,
one - level and multi - level concatenated codes can arbitrarily approach forney s and blokh - zyablov exponents with linear complexity , over general discrete - time memoryless channels .
consider one - level concatenated coding schemes .
assume , for an arbitrarily small @xmath25 , we can construct a linear encodable / decodable outer error - correction code , with rate @xmath20 and length @xmath26 , which can correct @xmath27 symbol errors and @xmath28 symbol erasures so long as @xmath29 . note that this is possible for large @xmath26 as shown by guruswami and indyk in @xcite . to simplify the notations , we assume @xmath30 is an integer . the outer code is concatenated with suitable inner codes with rate @xmath31 and fixed length @xmath32 .
the rate and length of the concatenated code are @xmath33 and @xmath34 , respectively . in forney s gmd decoding ,
inner codes forward not only the estimates @xmath35 $ ] but also a reliability vector @xmath36 $ ] to the outer code , where @xmath37 , @xmath38 and @xmath39 .
let @xmath40 for any outer codeword @xmath41 $ ] , define a dot product @xmath42 as follows @xmath43 [ theorem1 ] there is at most one codeword @xmath44 that satisfies @xmath45 theorem [ theorem1 ] is implied by theorem 3.1 in @xcite .
rearrange the weights in ascending order of their values and let @xmath46 be the indices such that @xmath47 define @xmath48 $ ] , for @xmath49 , where @xmath50 is a positive constant with @xmath51 being an integer , and @xmath52 is given by @xmath53 define dot product @xmath54 as @xmath55 then following theorem gives the key result that enables the revision of forney s gmd decoder .
[ theorem2 ] if @xmath56 , then for some @xmath49 , @xmath57@xmath58 .
define a set of values @xmath59 for @xmath60 and an integer @xmath61 , where @xmath62 .
can not be @xmath63 .
because if @xmath64 , i.e. , @xmath65 , then there are at least @xmath30 zeros in vector @xmath66 . consequently , @xmath67 , which contradicts the assumption that @xmath56 . ]
let @xmath68 we have @xmath69 and @xmath70 define a new weight vector @xmath71 $ ] with @xmath72 define @xmath73 $ ] with @xmath74 such that for @xmath75 @xmath76 and for @xmath77 @xmath78 we have @xmath79 define a set of indices @xmath80 according to the definition of @xmath81 , for @xmath82 , @xmath83 .
hence @xmath84 since @xmath85 , and @xmath86 , we have @xmath87 consequently , @xmath88 implies @xmath89 if @xmath90 for all @xmath91 s , then @xmath92 which contradicts ( [ alphax ] ) .
therefore , there must be some @xmath91 that satisfies @xmath93 since for @xmath94 , @xmath91 has no more than @xmath95 number of @xmath96 s , which implies @xmath97 , the vectors that satisfy ( [ px ] ) must exist among @xmath91 with @xmath98 . in words , for some @xmath99 , @xmath100 .
theorems [ theorem1 ] and [ theorem2 ] indicate that , if @xmath44 is transmitted and @xmath56 , for some @xmath49 , errors - and - erasures decoding specified by @xmath101 ( where symbols with @xmath102 are erased ) will output @xmath44 .
since the total number of @xmath101 vectors is upper bounded by a constant @xmath51 , the outer code carries out errors - and - erasures decoding only for a constant number of times .
consequently , a gmd decoding that carries out errors - and - erasures decoding for all @xmath101 s and compares their decoding outputs can recover @xmath44 with a complexity of @xmath103 . since the inner code length @xmath32 is fixed , the overall complexity is @xmath22 .
the following theorem gives an error probability bound for one - level concatenated codes with the revised gmd decoder .
[ theorem3 ] assume inner codes achieve gallager s error exponent given in ( [ gallagere ] ) .
let the reliability vector @xmath66 be generated according to forney s algorithm presented in ( * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* section 4.2 ) .
let @xmath44 be the transmitted outer codeword . for large enough @xmath8
, error probability of the one - level concatenated codes is upper bounded by @xmath104,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath21 is forney s error exponent given by ( [ ecr ] ) and @xmath105 is a function of @xmath106 and @xmath107 with @xmath108 if @xmath109 .
the proof of theorem [ theorem3 ] can be obtained by first replacing theorem 3.2 in @xcite with theorem [ theorem2 ] , and then following forney s analysis presented in ( * ? ? ?
* ; * ? ? ?
* section 4.2 ) .
the difference between forney s and the revised gmd decoding schemes lies in the definition of errors - and - erasures decodable vectors @xmath101 , the number of which determines the decoding complexity .
forney s gmd decoding needs to carry out errors - and - erasures decoding for a number of times linear in @xmath26 , whereas ours for a constant number of times .
although the idea behind the revised gmd decoding is similar to justesen s gmd algorithm @xcite , justesen s work has focused on error - correction codes where inner codes forward hamming distance information ( in the form of an @xmath110 vector ) to the outer code .
applying the revised gmd algorithm to multi - level concatenated codes @xcite@xcite is quite straightforward .
achievable error exponent of an @xmath111-level concatenated codes is given in the following theorem .
[ theorem4 ] for a discrete - time memoryless channel with capacity @xmath5 , for any @xmath112 and any integer @xmath113 , one can construct a sequence of @xmath111-level concatenated codes whose encoding / decoding complexity is linear in @xmath8 , and whose error probability is bounded by @xmath114}}\frac{\frac{r}{r_o}-r}{\frac{r}{r_om}\sum_{i=1}^m\left [ e_l\left((\frac { i}{m})\frac{r}{r_o},p_x\right ) \right ] ^{-1 } } \nonumber \\\end{aligned}\ ] ] the proof of theorem [ theorem4 ] can be obtained by combining theorem [ theorem3 ] and the derivation of @xmath115 in @xcite@xcite .
note that @xmath116 , where @xmath117 is the blokh - zyablov error exponent given in ( [ bzbound ] ) .
theorem [ theorem4 ] implies that , for discrete - time memoryless channels , blokh - zyablov error exponent can be arbitrarily approached with linear encoding / decoding complexity .
we proposed a revised gmd decoding algorithm for concatenated codes over general discrete - time memoryless channels . by combining the gmd algorithm with guruswami and indyk s error correction codes
, we showed that forney s and blokh - zyablov error exponents can be arbitrarily approached by one - level and multi - level concatenated coding schemes , respectively , with linear encoding / decoding complexity .
the authors would like to thank professor alexander barg for his help on multi - level concatenated codes .
|
communication over discrete - time memoryless channel modeled by conditional point mass function probability density function @xmath0 input output symbols input output alphabets @xmath5 be shannon capacity fano showed minimum error probability @xmath6 for block channel codes rate @xmath7 length @xmath8 bounded by @xmath9 @xmath10 positive function of channel transition probabilities error exponent finite input output alphabets without coding complexity maximum achievable @xmath10 given by gallager @xcite @xmath11 @xmath12 input distribution @xmath13 for different values of @xmath7 @xmath14 definitions variables gallagere1 replace pmf by pdf summations by integrals @xmath15 operators by @xmath16 maximum achievable error exponent for continuous channels input output alphabets real numbers given by gallagere forney proposed one - level concatenated coding scheme error exponent forney s exponent for any rate @xmath17 complexity of @xmath18 @xmath20 @xmath7 outer overall ratesforney s coding scheme concatenates maximum distance outer error - correction code with inner channel codes @xmath21 decoder reliability information from inner codes using minimum distance decoding algorithm @xcite algorithm carries outer code decoding for @xmath22 times decoding complexity of @xmath18 due to outer code reed - solomon code in @xcite complexity @xmath23 forney s concatenated codes generalized to multi - level concatenated codes by blokh and zyablov in @xcite order concatenation to infinity error exponent approaches blokh - zyablov bound @xcite guruswami and indyk proposed linear - time encodable mds error - correction codes concatenating codes with fixed - lengthed binary inner codes s gmd algorithm @xcite forney s error exponent achievable over binary symmetric channels with complexity of @xmath22 linear in codeword lengthouter code decodings justesen s gmd algorithm constant @xmath22 forney s each @xmath22 constant for linear complexity algorithm assumes binary channel outputs @xcite achievability forney s exponent proven for bscs in theorem 8) forney s algorithm revised to outer code decoding constant times revised guruswami - indyk s outer codes with fixed - lengthed inner codes one - multi - level concatenated codes approach forney s blokh - zyablov exponents with linear complexity over memoryless channels one - level concatenated coding schemes small @xmath25 linear encodable / decodable outer error - correction code rate @xmath20 length @xmath26 @xmath27 errors @xmath28 symbol erasures @xmath29 possible for large @xmath26 in @xcite @xmath30 integer outer code concatenated with inner codes with rate @xmath31 fixed length @xmath32 rate length of concatenated code are @xmath33 and @xmath34forney s gmd decoding inner codes forward estimates @xmath35 reliability vector @xmath36 outer code @xmath37 @xmath40 outer codeword @xmath41 define dot product @xmath42 one codeword @xmath44 satisfies @xmath45 theorem implied theorem 3.1 @xcite rearrange weights ascending order @xmath46 indices @xmath47 define @xmath48 @xmath49 @xmath50 positive constant @xmath51 integer @xmath52 @xmath53 define dot product @xmath54 @xmath55 theorem key result revision forney gmd decoder theorem2 @xmath56 @xmath49 define values @xmath59 @xmath60 integer @xmath61 @xmath62 @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 @xmath30 zeros vector @xmath66 @xmath67 contradicts assumption @xmath56 @xmath68 @xmath69 @xmath70 define new weight vector @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 @xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76 @xmath77 @xmath79 define indices @xmath80 definition @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83@xmath84 @xmath85 @xmath86 @xmath87 @xmath88 implies @xmath89 @xmath90 @xmath91 s @xmath92 contradicts alphax @xmath91 satisfies @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath91 no more than @xmath95 @xmath96 s implies @xmath97 vectors satisfy exist among @xmath91 @xmath98 @xmath99 @xmath100 theorems @xmath44 transmitted @xmath56 @xmath49 errors - - erasures decoding @xmath101 symbols @xmath102 erased output @xmath44 total number @xmath101 vectors constant @xmath51 outer code carries errors - - erasures decoding constant number times gmd decoding @xmath101 recover @xmath44 complexity @xmath103 inner code length @xmath32 fixed overall complexity is @xmath22 theorem gives error probability bound for one - level concatenated codes with revised gmd decoder theorem3 ] inner codes achieve gallager s error exponent reliability vector @xmath66 generated forney s algorithm @xmath44 transmitted outer codewordlarge @xmath8 error probability one - level concatenated codes bounded @xmath104 @xmath21 forney s error exponent @xmath105 function @xmath106 @xmath107 @xmath108 proof theorem replacing theorem 3.2 @xcite with theorem theorem2 following forney s analysis section 4.2 difference forney s revised gmd decoding schemes definition errors - - erasures decodable vectors @xmath101 determines decoding complexity forney s decoding errors - - erasures decoding times linear @xmath26 ours constant times revised gmd decoding similar justesen s gmd algorithm @xcite error - correction codes inner codes forward distance information @xmath110 vector outer code applying revised gmd algorithm multi - level concatenated codes @xcite straightforward achievable error exponent @xmath111-level concatenated codes theoremtheorem4 discrete - time memoryless channel @xmath5 @xmath112 @xmath113 construct sequence @xmath111-level concatenated codes encoding decoding complexity linear @xmath8 error probability bounded @xmath114}} proof theorem combining theorem theorem3 derivation @xmath115 @xcite @xmath116 @xmath117 blokh - zyablov error exponent theorem implies discrete - time memoryless channels blokh - zyablov error exponent arbitrarily approached linear encoding decoding complexity proposed revised gmd decoding algorithm concatenated codes - memoryless channels combining gmd algorithm guruswami indyk s error correction codes showed forney s blokh - zyablov error exponents arbitrarily approached one - level multi - level concatenated coding schemes linear encoding decoding complexity authors professor alexander barg help multi - level concatenated codes
| 0.429816
| 2,755
| 1,422
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,426
|
we extend the rack algebra @xmath0 $ ] defined by andruskiewitsch and graa to the case of biracks , enabling a notion of birack modules .
we use these birack modules to define an enhancement of the birack counting invariant generalizing the birack module counting invariant in @xcite .
we provide examples demonstrating that the enhanced invariant is not determined by the jones or alexander polynomials and is strictly stronger than the unenhanced birack counting invariant .
|
_ biracks _ were first introduced in @xcite as a generalization of _ racks _ , algebraic structures whose axioms encode blackboard - framed isotopy of oriented knots and links in @xmath1 .
initially called `` wracks '' alluding to the `` wrack and ruin '' resulting from keeping only conjugation in a group , racks were first considered by conway and wraith in the 1950s @xcite .
the current term `` rack '' ( without the `` w '' ) is due to fenn and rourke in @xcite , who dropped the `` w '' to denote dropping invariance under writhe - changing type i reidemeister moves . in @xcite , an integer - valued invariant of knots and links associated to a finite birack @xmath2 known as the _ integral birack counting invariant _
, @xmath3 was introduced by the second author , generalizing the rack counting invariant from @xcite . in @xcite an associative algebra known as the _ rack algebra _
@xmath0 $ ] was defined for every finite rack , and in @xcite the rack counting invariant from @xcite was enhanced with representations ( known as _ rack modules _ ) of a modified form of @xmath0 $ ] . in this paper , for every finite birack @xmath2 we define an associative algebra @xmath4 $ ] we call the _ birack algebra_. we use representations of @xmath4 $ ] , known as or @xmath2-modules , to enhance the birack counting invariant from @xcite .
the new invariant is defined for classical and virtual knots and links .
the paper is organized as follows : in section [ b ] we review the basics of biracks and the birack counting invariant . in section [ ba ]
we define the birack algebra and give examples of birack modules . in section [ i ]
we use birack modules to enhance the birack counting invariant and give examples to demonstrate that the birack module enhanced invariant is not determined by the jones or alexander polynomials and is strictly stronger than the unenhanced birack counting invariant .
we conclude with a few questions for future research in section [ q ] .
we begin with a definition ( see @xcite ) .
it is frequently useful to specify a birack structure on a finite set @xmath5 by listing the operation tables for the components of @xmath6 viewed as binary operations @xmath7 and @xmath8 .
note the reversed order of the operands in @xmath9 ; this is for compatibility with previous work representing these operations as right actions .
then a birack operation @xmath6 on @xmath2 is specified by the @xmath10 matrix @xmath11 $ ] with @xmath12 and @xmath13 where @xmath14 and @xmath15 .
conversely , such a matrix specifies a birack structure iff the operation it defines via @xmath16},x_{l[i , j]})\ ] ] satisfies the birack axioms . as with other algebraic structures ,
we have the following standard notions : the birack axioms encode the blackboard - framed reidemeister moves with semiarcs labeled according to the rules below .
@xmath17 at a positive kink , the invertibility properties of @xmath6 define bijections @xmath18 and @xmath19 defined by @xmath20 and @xmath21 which give us the labels on the other semiarcs in a blackboard framed type i move .
@xmath22 the exponent @xmath23 of the bijection @xmath24 , that is , the smallest positive integer @xmath23 satisfying @xmath25 for all @xmath26 , is known as the _ birack rank _ or _
birack characteristic _ of @xmath2 .
if @xmath2 is a finite set , then @xmath23 is guaranteed to exist , but infinite biracks may have infinite rank . @xmath27 a labeling of semiarcs in a framed oriented link diagram with elements of a birack @xmath2 determines a homomorphism @xmath28 if and only if the birack labeling condition is satisfied by the labels in @xmath2 at every crossing .
conversely , every homomorphism @xmath28 determines a unique labeling of the semiarcs of @xmath29 . by construction
, we have the following standard result : if @xmath29 and @xmath30 are oriented link diagrams which are related by blackboard framed reidemeister moves and @xmath2 is a finite birack , then the sets of labelings of the semiarcs of @xmath29 and @xmath30 by elements of @xmath2 satisfying the birack labeling condition , @xmath31 and @xmath32 , are in bijective correspondence . thus , the cardinality of the set of birack labelings of an oriented link diagram by a finite birack @xmath2 is a positive integer valued invariant of framed isotopy . to obtain an invariant of unframed ambient isotopy
, we observe as in @xcite that the cardinalities of the sets of birack labelings are periodic in the birack rank @xmath33 since birack labelings are preserved by the _ @xmath23-phone cord move _ : @xmath34 thus , summing these cardinalities over a complete period of framings mod @xmath23 yields an invariant of ambient isotopy known as the _ integral birack counting invariant _ @xmath35 more formally , we have @xmath36 [ ex1 ] @xmath37 @xmath38 the integral birack counting invariant is also defined for virtual links via the usual technique of ignoring virtual crossings when dividing the link into semiarcs or , equivalently , regarding our virtual link diagrams as being drawn on a surface with sufficient genus to avoid virtual crossings .
we would like to enhance the integral birack counting invariant by finding a way to distinguish between labelings rather than just counting how many total labeling we have . to this end , we will use a scheme analogous to the @xmath40-birack structure to define an associative algebra we call the _ birack algebra _ associated to a finite birack @xmath2 .
we will discuss the motivation for this definition later in this section .
* @xmath41 * @xmath42 * @xmath43 * @xmath44 * @xmath45 * @xmath46 * @xmath47 the motivation behind the birack algebra definition is to define secondary labelings of @xmath2-labeled oriented blackboard framed link diagrams with a `` bead '' at every semiarc and to use the @xmath40-birack operations on the beads at a crossing with each @xmath48 and @xmath49 coefficient indexed by the @xmath2-labels on the input strands at a positive crossing and the output strands at a negative crossing . @xmath50
the birack algebra relations are chosen to preserve bead labelings under the blackboard - framed reidemeister moves and the @xmath23-phone cord move .
the choice of bead labeling rules guarantees that for every blackboard framed @xmath2-labeled diagram , the number of bead labelings is the same before and after type ii moves and framed type i moves : @xmath51 @xmath52 the other type ii and framed type i cases are similar .
six of the seven birack algebra relations come from the type iii move : @xmath53 comparing coefficients on the output beads @xmath54 and @xmath55 yields the first six relations .
the final birack algebra relation comes from the @xmath23-phone cord move . pushing a bead on a strand labeled with birack element @xmath56 though a positive kink multiplies the bead by @xmath57 ; thus , we need the product of these over a complete period of framings mod @xmath23 to be @xmath58 . @xmath59.\ ] ] @xmath60= \left[\begin{array}{cccccccc } t_{2,1 } & -1 & 0 & 0 & s_{2,1 } & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & r_{2,1 } & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & s_{2,1 } & 0 & 0 & 0 & t_{2,1 } & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & r_{2,1 } & -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & t_{2,1 } & -1 & 0 & 0 & s_{2,1 } & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & r_{2,1 } & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & s_{2,1 } & -1 & 0 & 0 & t_{2,1 } \\ -1 & 0 & 0 & r_{2,1 } & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array}\right]$}\ ] ]
we will now use an @xmath2-module @xmath61 to enhance the integral birack counting invariant by taking the set of @xmath4$]-module homomorphisms @xmath62}(\mathbb{z}_f[x],r)$ ] as a signature for each birack labeling @xmath63 . since each homomorphism in @xmath62}(\mathbb{z}_f[x],r)$ ] can be understood as a labeling of the beads by elements of @xmath61 , we are effectively counting bead labelings of @xmath2-labelings of @xmath29 , enhancing the birack counting invariant with a bead counting invariant of @xmath2-labeling of @xmath29 .
@xmath64}(\mathbb{z}_f[x],r)\ |\ f\in \mathrm{hom}(fb((l,\mathbf{w})),x ) , \mathbf{w}\in w\}\ ] ] @xmath65}(\mathbb{z}_f[x],r)|}\right).\ ] ] by construction , we have if @xmath29 and @xmath30 are ambient isotopic oriented classical or virtual links , then @xmath66 and @xmath67 .
note that the integral birack counting invariant @xmath68 is recovered from the birack module enhanced invariant @xmath69 by evaluating at @xmath70 and from @xmath71 by taking cardinality . in our next example
we show that @xmath72 is stronger in general than @xmath73 .
@xmath74\ ] ] @xmath75\ ] ] @xmath76}=\left[\begin{array}{cccccc } 0 & -1 & 0 & s_{u , v } & t_{u , v } & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & r_{u , v } & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 & s_{z , w } & 0 & 0 & t_{z , w } \\ 0 & 0 & r_{z , w } & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 & s_{v , w } & t_{v , w } \\
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & r_{v , w } & 0 \\ \end{array}\right ] \\ \end{array}$}\ ] ] @xmath77 \rightarrow \left[\begin{array}{cccccc } 0 & 4 & 0 & 3 & 4 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 & 2 & 0 & 0 \\ 4 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 4 \\ 0 & 0 & 2 & 4 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 3 & 4 \\ 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 0 \\ \end{array}\right ] \rightarrow \left[\begin{array}{cccccc } 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \end{array}\right]\ ] ] @xmath78\ ] ] @xmath79\ ] ] @xmath80 @xmath81\ ] ]
we end with a few open questions for future research . are there examples of biracks @xmath2 and birack modules @xmath61 whose @xmath82 invariants detect mutation or homflypt - equivalent knots ?
can @xmath82 distinguish knots and links with the same khovanov or knot floer homology ?
what , if any , is the relationship between birack module invariants and vassiliev invariants ? in @xcite , biquandle labelings are extended to define counting invariants of knotted surfaces in @xmath83 , and in particular it is shown that surface biquandles are just biquandles .
does the same hold for the _ surface biquandle algebra _ obtained by requiring bead - labeling invariance under roseman moves ?
|
biracks introduced in @xcite generalization of racks algebraic structures blackboard - framed oriented knots links in @xmath1 initially called wracks racks considered by conway wraith 1950s current term rack without w due to fenn rourke dropped w '' dropping invariance @xcite integer - valued invariant of knots links to finite birack integral birack counting invariant @xmath3 introduced by second author generalizing rack counting invariant from @xcite associative algebra rack algebra _ defined for every finite rack rack counting invariant enhanced with representations rack modules of modified form @xmath0 $ paper for every finite birack @xmath2 associative algebra birack algebra_ use representations @xmath4 @xmath2-modules enhance birack counting invariant new invariant defined for classical virtual knots links paper organized section [ b ] review basics of biracks birack counting invariant section [ ba ] define birack algebra examples of birack modulessection i ] use birack modules enhance birack counting invariant demonstrate not determined by jones alexander polynomials stronger than unenhanced invariant conclude questions future research section q ] begin definition @xcite specify birack structure finite set @xmath5 operation tables components @xmath6 binary operations @xmath7 @xmath8 reversed order operands @xmath9 compatibility work birack operation @xmath6 on @xmath2 specified by @xmath10 matrix @xmath11 @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 @xmath15 matrix specifies birack structure operation defines @xmath16 satisfies birack axioms standard birack axioms encode blackboard - framed reidemeister moves semiarcs labeled rules @xmath17 positive invertibility properties @xmath6 define bijections @xmath18 @xmath19 defined @xmath20 @xmath21 labels other semiarcs blackboard framed move @xmath22 exponent @xmath23 bijection @xmath24 smallest positive integer satisfying @xmath25 @xmath26 known birack rank characteristic of @xmath2@xmath2 finite set @xmath23 infinite biracks infinite rank @xmath27 labeling semiarcs link diagram with elements birack @xmath2 determines homomorphism @xmath28 birack labeling condition satisfied labels crossing every homomorphism @xmath28 determines unique labeling semiarcs @xmath29 result @xmath29 @xmath30 oriented link diagrams related framed moves @xmath2 finite birack labelings semiarcs @xmath29 @xmath30 elements @xmath2 birack @xmath31 @xmath32 bijective correspondence cardinality birack labelings diagram finite birack @xmath2 positive integer valued invariant framed isotopy invariant unframed ambient isotopy cardinalities birack labelings periodic birack rank @xmath33 birack labelings preserved @xmath23-phone cord move @xmath34 summing cardinalities framings @xmath23 yields invariant ambient isotopy integral birack counting invariant @xmath35 @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 integral birack counting invariant defined for virtual links ignoring virtual crossings dividing link semiarcs virtual link diagrams drawn genus avoid virtual crossingsenhance integral birack counting invariant labelings counting use scheme analogous @xmath40-birack structure define associative algebra birack algebra associated finite birack @xmath2 discuss motivation definition later @xmath41 define secondary labelings @xmath2-labeled blackboard framed link diagrams bead at every semiarc use @xmath40-birack operations on beads crossing @xmath48 @xmath49 coefficient indexed @xmath2-labels input strands positive output negative crossing @xmath50 birack algebra relations preserve bead labelings under blackboard - framed reidemeister moves @xmath23-phone cord move bead labeling rules guarantees @xmath2-labeled diagram number bead labelings same before after type ii moves framed type i moves six of seven birack algebra relations from type iii move comparing coefficients output beads @xmath54 @xmath55 yields first six relations final birack algebra relation from @xmath23-phone cord move pushing bead on strand labeled birack element @xmath56 multiplies bead by @xmath57 need product over framings @xmath23 @xmath58@xmath59 @xmath60\left{array} t_{2,1 } -1 0 s_{2,1 } 0 0 r_{2,1 } -1 0 0 s_{2,1 } 0 0 t_{2,1 } 0 -1 r_{2,1 } -1 0 0 t_{2,1 } -1 0 s_{2,1 } r_{2,1 } -1 0 0 0 s_{2,1 } -1 0 0 t_{2,1 } -1 0 0 r_{2,1 } 0 0 0 \end{array}\right$ use @xmath2-module @xmath61 enhance integral birack counting invariant @xmath4$]-module homomorphisms @xmath62}_f[x signature each birack labeling @xmath63 each homomorphism labeling beads @xmath61 counting bead labelings @xmath2-labelings @xmath29 enhancing birack counting invariant bead counting invariant @xmath2-labeling @xmath29 @xmath64}(\mathbb{z}_f[x],r) \mathrm{hom}(fb\mathbf{w})),x\mathbf{w} @xmath65}(\mathbb{z}_f[x],r)|\right). @xmath29 @xmath30 ambient isotopic classical virtual links @xmath66 @xmath67 integral birack invariant @xmath68 recovered from @xmath69 @xmath70 @xmath71 cardinality @xmath72 stronger than @xmath73@xmath74 @xmath75 @xmath76\left{array}{cccccc 0 -1 0 s_{u , v t_{u v 0 0 0 -1 r_{u , v 0 0 -1 0 s_{z , w 0 0 t_{z , w 0 0 r_{z , w -1 0 0 -1 0 s_{v , w t_{v , w -1 0 0 0 r_{v , w\end{array}\right{array}} @xmath77 \rightarrow\left\begin{array}{cccccc 0 4 & 0 3 & 4 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 & 4 4 0 0 0 2 0\end{array}\right\left\begin{array}{cccccc 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1\end{array}\right @xmath78 @xmath79\ @xmath80 @xmath81\ open questions future researchexamples biracks @xmath2 modules invariants detect mutation homflypt knots ? @xmath82 distinguish knots links khovanov homology ? relationship birack module invariants vassiliev invariants ? biquandle labelings define counting invariants knotted surfaces @xmath83 surface biquandles biquandles surface biquandle algebra bead - labeling invariance roseman moves ?
| 0.490903
| 2,941
| 1,607
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,430
|
it is well known that mean - field theories fail to reproduce the experimentally known critical exponents .
the traditional argument which explain this failure of mean - field theories near a critical point is the ginsburg criterion in which diverging fluctuations of the order parameter is the root cause .
we argue , contrary to the above mentioned traditional view , that diverging fluctuations in real physical systems near a critical point are genuine consequence of the breakdown of the property of statistical independence , and are faithfully reproduced by the mean - field theory . by looking at the problem from the point of view of `` statistical independence '' the divergence of fluctuations in real physical systems near criticality becomes immediately apparent as a connection can be established between diverging correlation length and diverging fluctuations . to address the question of why mean - field theories , much successful qualitatively , fail to reproduce the known values of critical indices we argue , using the essential ideas of the wilsonian renormalization group , that mean - field theories fail to capture the long length scale averages of an order parameter near a critical point
|
the contradiction of mean - field theories ( mfts ) with experiment near a critical point was apparent , even from the days of andrews ( 1869)@xcite .
problems of mfts were well established by 1960s and were resolved by the advent of renormalization group theory due to wilson and others in early 1970s@xcite .
mft fails to predict correct values of critical indices , for example , the exponent @xmath0 of magnetization @xmath1 differs in mft and in experiment : @xmath2 and @xmath3 .
one can generally say that mfts are qualitatively correct but quantitatively wrong . in the traditional viewpoint , this failure of mft is assigned to diverging fluctuations near a critical point@xcite .
one generally argues as follows .
consider landau s formulation of mfts@xcite and write free energy per unit volume in the presence of magnetic field @xmath4 as @xmath5 as magnetization per unit volume @xmath6 is a thermodynamical variable , probability of its fluctuation , from @xmath6 to @xmath7 with respect to unfluctuated state is : @xmath8 by taylor expanding free energy about unfluctuated value , one will have @xmath9 as @xmath10 the magnetic susceptibility is defined as @xmath11 , differentiating the free energy ( above ) twice wrt @xmath6 one can write @xmath10 as @xmath12 this gives the root - mean - square ( rms ) value ( @xmath13 ) of @xmath6 at @xmath14 : @xmath15 as the fluctuations are gaussian fluctuations .
thus , one notices that as @xmath10 diverges at @xmath16 , the rms fluctuation in @xmath6 also diverges ! or within mean - field theory near the critical point , fluctuations dominate on the average behavior .
this diverging fluctuations near a critical point is viewed as a problem of mfts , and thus mfts predict wrong values of the critical indices . or in more appropriate language mft predicts its own demise@xcite .
contrary to this we argue that diverging fluctuations in real physical systems near a critical point are genuine ( they are actually present in real physical systems ) and the mft theory faithfully reproduce that .
the prediction of diverging fluctuations is an other success of mfts ( including its qualitative description of various phases ) .
the reason why mfts fail to predict correct values of critical indices is different one and is explained below using wilsonian renormalization group ideas . to support our above argument of faithful reproduction of diverging fluctuations by mft near a critical point
we give two justifications .
first one is based on the breakdown of a very important property of statistical independence ( si ) when the correlation length diverges near a critical point . from the breakdown of si one
can show the divergence of fluctuations .
the other one is based on the fluctuation - dissipation theorem and power law correlation functions .
divergence of correlation length can be seen very easily from ginzburg - landau formulation@xcite in which order parameter @xmath17 vary weakly on atomic dimensions : @xmath18 one can calculate the correlation length @xmath19 ( length scale over which the effect of a fixed test spin extends out to other spins ) by considering a delta function magnetic field : @xmath20 . by standard procedure of minimizing @xmath21 one can easily show@xcite : @xmath22 above differential equation
can be solved easily with fourier transforms : @xmath23 and the correlation length can be defined : @xmath24 .
the correlation length diverges at the critical point , a standard result . the diverging correlation length is intimately connected to diverging fluctuations .
this can be very clearly seen with the breakdown of statistical independence ( si ) .
the fundamental reason is that due to large correlation length various sub - parts of the system respond in a correlated way .
this renders the system non - self - averaging ! the fundamental hypothesis of si ( actually an important property of ordinary statistical mechanical systems , i.e. , systems with short range inter - particle interactions ) as advocated by landau@xcite breaks down and fluctuations in the sum - function observables ( @xmath25 ) do not obey @xmath26 law@xcite near criticality . or fluctuations do not converge : let a given system is divided into two parts .
let @xmath27 be the distribution function for part 1 and @xmath28 for part 2 .
if the two parts of the system are correlated ( due to large correlation length ) , then @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the distribution function of whole system .
this is the breakdown of si .
one immediate consequence is that statistical average of two physical quantities will obey : @xmath31 if @xmath32 ( system containing @xmath33 sub - parts ) , then @xmath34 as @xmath35 . from this
it follows that the relative fluctuation ( @xmath36 ) does not obey @xmath26 ( whereas in standard statistical mechanical systems due to large @xmath33 fluctuations are negligible ) .
thus systems near criticality , due to the presence of long correlation length , lose the important property of self - averaging ! _ from above we observe a very important connection : diverging correlation length and breakdown of si are connected with each other .
_ diverging fluctuations due to diverging correlation length can also be seen through fluctuation - dissipation theorem : by fluctuation - dissipation theorem ( fdt ) the magnetic susceptibility @xmath10 and the correlation function @xmath37 are related to each other@xcite : @xmath38 at the critical point the correlation function assumes a power law as the correlation length diverges ( @xmath39 ) . due to the power law correlation function
the above integral do not converge and thus susceptibility diverges which from above analysis of gaussian fluctuations leads to diverging rms value of @xmath6 ( @xmath13 ) . above two justifications
one based upon si and the other on fdt do not involve mean - field ideas and thus independently verify what is predicted by the mfts and seen in actual experiments .
to understand why mft fails to reproduce critical data one has to consider the construction of mft .
consider the standard ising model ( figure [ ising ] ) : [ cols="^,^ " , ] let the system be immersed in an external magnetic field @xmath4 .
the hamiltonian in dimensionless form ( @xmath40 and @xmath41 ) is : @xmath42 there are two competing tendencies ( 1 ) lining - up of spins due to @xmath43 and @xmath44 , and ( 2 ) disruption due to thermal agitation . at low temperatures
first prevails and at high the second .
ising model mean - field theory is done in standard way@xcite .
first , consider only one spin immersed in magnetic field .
ensemble average is : @xmath45 next , consider the immersed test spin interacting with many neighboring spins : @xmath46 with @xmath47 here the exact field @xmath48 due to nearest neighbor spins is replaced by an effective field @xmath49 ( @xmath50 is called the coordination number ( number of nearest spins ) .
this constitutes the mf approximation .
right here one makes an error when one is near the critical point : near the critical point fluctuations become long ranged ( diverging correlation length ) .
these long ranged correlations enhance the effective field seen by our test spin .
thus @xmath51 or the mfts fail to account for the effective field generated due to weak non - zero values of magnetization on a much larger length scales ( as compared to lattice constant ) when temperature is only slightly less than the critical temperature .
in other words in mfts averages are done on a length scale ( of the order of lattice constant ) much smaller than the correlation length which is quite large as compared to lattice constant near criticality . and
averages on a smaller length scale gives @xmath52 when temperature is slightly less than the critical temperature , but on a larger length scale of the order of correlation length it is not zero . to properly take into account this important long distance effects one must average out fluctuations on all length scales step by step ( see for example@xcite ) .
one very visual procedure is the kadanoff blocking method@xcite and results are in very good agreement with experiment and with exact solutions in special cases@xcite .
see also the last section in@xcite .
a common misconception that mean - field theory predicts its own demise is clarified . near a critical point
diverging fluctuations are _ actually _ present in real physical systems , and the mfts very faithfully reproduce those .
thus , this should be viewed as another success of mfts , not their failure .
the reason why mfts predict wrong values of critical indices is that the mfts fail to account for weak non - zero values of order parameter on a much larger length scales ( as compared to lattice constant ) when temperature is only slightly less than the critical temperature . in other words in mfts averages
are done on a length scale much smaller than the correlation length which is quite large as compared to lattice constant near criticality .
|
contradiction of mean - field theories with experiment near critical point apparent from andrews 1869 problems established by 1960s resolved by renormalization group theory early 1970s mft fails to predict critical indices exponent of magnetization differs in mft experiment mfts qualitatively correct but quantitatively wrong failure assigned to diverging fluctuations near critical point consider landau s formulation mfts write free energy per unit volume in magnetic field @xmath4 as @xmath5 as magnetization per unit volume @xmath6 thermodynamical variable probability of fluctuation from to expanding free energy @xmath9 as @xmath10 magnetic susceptibility defined as @xmath11 write @xmath10 as @xmath12 root - mean - square rms value of @xmath6 at @xmath14 fluctuations are gaussian fluctuations @xmath10 diverges at @xmath16 rms fluctuation in @xmath6 diverges theory near critical point fluctuations dominate average behavior diverging fluctuations near point problem of mfts predict wrong values critical indicesmft predicts demise@xcite contrary we argue diverging fluctuations in real physical systems near critical point genuine mft theory prediction of diverging fluctuations success of mfts qualitative description phases mfts fail to predict critical indices explained using wilsonian renormalization group ideas support argument reproduction diverging fluctuations mft near critical point two justifications first based on breakdown of property statistical independence si ) when correlation length diverges near critical point breakdown show divergence of fluctuations other based on fluctuation - dissipation theorem power law correlation functions divergence of correlation length seen from ginzburg - landau formulation@xcite atomic dimensions calculate correlation length spin by considering delta function magnetic field minimizing @xmath21@xcite @xmath22 differential equation solved with fourier transforms correlation length defined correlation length diverges at critical point diverging correlation length connected to diverging fluctuations seen with breakdown of statistical independence due to large correlation length sub - parts system respond renders system non - self - averaging fundamental hypothesis of si important property of statistical mechanical systemssystems short range - particle interactions advocated by landau@xcite breaks down fluctuations sum - function observables @xmath25 obey @xmath26 law near criticality fluctuations converge system divided into two parts @xmath27 distribution function part 1 @xmath28 part 2 if parts correlated large correlation length @xmath29 @xmath30 distribution function whole system breakdown of si statistical average of two physical quantities obey @xmath31 @xmath32 @xmath34 @xmath35 relative fluctuation @xmath36 obey @xmath26 standard statistical systems large @xmath33 fluctuations negligible systems near criticality long correlation length lose self - averaging diverging correlation length breakdown of si connected diverging fluctuations correlation length seen through fluctuation - dissipation theorem magnetic susceptibility @xmath10 correlation function @xmath37 related @xmath38 critical point correlation function assumes power law correlation length diverges @xmath39 converge susceptibility diverges leads to diverging rms value of @xmath6 ( @xmath13 )two justifications one si other fdt involve mean - field ideas verify predicted mfts seen experiments understand mft fails reproduce critical data consider construction standard ising model figure system immersed in external magnetic field @xmath4 hamiltonian dimensionless form @xmath40 @xmath42 two competing tendencies lining - up spins @xmath43 disruption thermal agitation low temperatures first prevails high second ising model mean - field theory standard way@xcite consider one spin immersed in magnetic field ensemble average @xmath45 immersed test spin interacting with neighboring spins @xmath46 @xmath47 exact field @xmath48 replaced by effective field @xmath49 @xmath50 coordination number nearest spins mf approximation error near critical point fluctuations become long ranged diverging correlation length enhance effective field test spin @xmath51 mfts fail account for effective field due weak non - zero values magnetization larger length scales lattice constant temperature slightly less than critical temperature mfts averages length scale lattice constant smaller than correlation length compared lattice constant near criticalityaverages smaller length scale gives @xmath52 when temperature slightly less than critical temperature larger length scale not zero long distance effects average fluctuations all length scales step by step see@xcite visual procedure kadanoff blocking method results with experiment solutions special cases misconception mean - field theory predicts demise clarified near critical point diverging fluctuations present in real physical systems mfts reproduce success of mfts not failure mfts predict wrong values critical indices fail to account for weak non - zero values order parameter larger length scales when temperature slightly less than critical temperature mfts averages done length scale smaller than correlation length large compared to lattice constant near criticality
| 0.313004
| 1,975
| 955
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,433
|
we investigate a static solution with an hyperbolic nature , characterised by a pseudo - spherical foliation of space .
this space - time metric can be perceived as an anti - schwarzschild solution , and exhibits repulsive features .
it belongs to the class of static vacuum solutions termed `` a degenerate static solution of class a '' ( see [ 1 ] ) . in the present work we review its fundamental features ,
discuss the existence of generalised wormholes , and derive its extension to scalar - tensor gravity theories in general .
|
we consider a largely ignored metric which belongs to a class of vacuum solutions referred to as degenerate solutions of class a @xcite given by @xmath0 which are axisymmetric solutions , but where the usual 2-dimensional spheres are replaced by pseudo - spheres , @xmath1 , i.e. , by surfaces of negative , constant curvature . these are still surfaces of revolution around an axis , and @xmath2 represents the corresponding rotation angle . for the vacuum case
we get @xmath3 where @xmath4 is a constant .
we immediately see that the static solution holds for @xmath5 and that there is a coordinate singularity at @xmath6 ( note that @xmath7 neither vanishes nor becomes @xmath8 at @xmath6)@xcite .
this is the complementary domain of the exterior schwarzschild solution . in the region @xmath9 , as in the latter solution , the @xmath10 and @xmath11 metric coefficients swap signs . defining @xmath12 and @xmath13
, we obtain @xmath14 with the following parametric definitions @xmath15 , @xmath16 and @xmath17 , which is a particular case of a bianchi iii axisymetric universe .
using pseudo - spherical coordinates @xmath18 , the spatial part of the metric ( [ metric_constnc ] ) can be related to the hyperboloid @xmath19 embedded in a 4-dimensional flat space .
we then have @xmath20\,{\rm d}r^2 + r^2 \left ( { \rm d}u^2+\sinh^2u\ , { \rm d}v^2 \right ) \ ; .\ ] ] where the prime stands for differentiation with respect to @xmath21 , and @xmath22 .
we can recast metric ( [ metric_constnc ] ) into the following @xmath23 \,{\rm d}\tau^2 + \left(\frac{2\mu}{\bar r}\right)^2\ , \cos ^4\left[\ln\left ( \bar r\right)^{\mp 1}\right]\ , \left[{\rm d}\bar{r}^2\,+ \bar r^2\,({\rm d}u^2 + \sinh^2{u}\,{\rm d}v^2 ) \right]\ ; , \label{isotrop3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which is the analogue of the isotropic form of the schwarzschild solution
. the spatial surfaces are conformally flat , but the flat metric is not euclidean .
indeed , the 3dim spatial metric @xmath24 is foliated by 2-dimensional surfaces of negative curvature , since @xmath25 , and it corresponds to @xmath26 .
we thus can not recover the usual newtonian weak - field limit .
analysing the `` radial '' motion of test particles , we have the following equation @xmath27 where @xmath28 and @xmath29 are constants of motion defined by @xmath30 and @xmath31 , for fixed @xmath32 .
the former and latter constants represent the energy and angular momentum per unit mass , respectively .
we thus define the potential @xmath33 this potential is manifestly repulsive , crosses the @xmath21-axis at @xmath6 , and for sufficiently high values of @xmath29 it has a minimum at @xmath34 .
however this minimum falls outside the @xmath6 divide .
so a test particle is subject to a repulsive potential forcing it to inevitably cross the event horizon at @xmath6 attracted either by some mass at the minimum or by masses at infinity . in it
is hinted that the non - existence of a clear newtonian analogue is related to the existence of mass sources at @xmath8 , but no definite conclusions were drawn .
a natural extension of the solution ( [ metric_constnc - antiscwarz ] ) would be to add exotic matter to obtain static and pseudo - spherically symmetric traversable wormhole solutions @xcite .
consider the metric ( [ metric_constnc ] ) given by @xmath35 and @xmath36 $ ] . the coordinate @xmath21 decreases from a constant value @xmath4 to a minimum value @xmath37 , representing the location of the throat of the wormhole , where @xmath38 , and then it increases from @xmath37 back to the value @xmath4 . the condition @xmath39 imposes that @xmath40 , contrary to the morris - thorne counterpart @xcite .
the solution provides the following stress - energy scenario @xmath41 \label{radialpwh}\,,\\ p_t(r)&=&\frac{1}{8\pi } \left(\frac{b}{r}-1\right)\bigg[\phi ' ' + ( \phi')^2 + \frac{b'r+b - r}{2r(b - r)}\phi ' + \frac{b'r - b}{2r^2(b - r ) } \bigg ] \label{lateralpwh}\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] in which @xmath42 is the energy density , @xmath43 is the radial pressure , @xmath44 is the pressure measured in the tangential directions .
note that the radial pressure is always positive at the throat , i.e , @xmath45 , contrary to the morris - thorne wormhole , where a radial tension at the throat is needed to sustain the wormhole .
in addition to this , the mathematics of embedding imposes that @xmath46 at the throat , which implies a negative energy density at the throat ( see @xcite for more details ) .
this condition is another significant difference to the morris - thorne wormhole , where the existence of negative energy densities at the throat is not a necessary condition .
several interesting equations of state were considered in @xcite , and we refer the reader to this work for more details .
a theorem by buchdahl @xcite establishes the reciprocity between any static solution of einstein s vacuum field equations and a one - parameter family of solutions of einstein s equations with a ( massless ) scalar field . in the conformally transformed einstein frame , note that scalar - tensor gravity theories are described by @xmath47 + \left ( 16\pi g_n/\phi^{-2}(\varphi)\right)\ , l_{matter}\right ] \label{e_st_action } $ ] . in this representation
we have gr plus a massles scalar field which is now coupled to the matter fields .
different scalar - tensor theories correspond to different couplings . in the absence of matter
we can use buchdahl s theorem .
so , given the metric ( [ metric_constnc ] ) , we derive the corresponding scalar - tensor solution @xmath48 where @xmath49 and @xmath50 .
this clearly reduces to our anti - schwarzschild metric ( [ metric_constnc ] ) in the gr limit when @xmath51 , and hence @xmath52 implying that @xmath53 is constant . reverting @xmath54 , and the conformal transformation , @xmath55 , we can recast this solution in the original frame in which the scalar - field is coupled to the geometry and the content is vacuum , the so - called jordan frame .
the @xmath6 limit is no longer just a coordinate singularity , but rather a true singularity as it can be verified from the analysis of the curvature invariants . in the einstein frame
this occurs because the energy density of the scalar field diverges likewise in the schwarzschild case@xcite . of paramount importance
is that , once again , the st - solution has no newtonian limit ( as its gr limit does not have one ) .
this implies that the usual parametrized post - newtonian formalism that assesses the departures of modified gravity theories from gr does not hold for this class of metrics ( see @xcite ) .
we have outlined the exotic features of the vacuum static solution with a pseudo - spherical foliation of space .
we have revealed the existence of generalised wormholes , and derived its extension to scalar - tensor gravity theories .
a fundamental feature of these solutions is the absence of a newtonian weak field limit , which reminds us of a quotation from john barrow @xcite _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the miracle of general relativity is that a purely mathematical assembly of second - rank tensors should have anything to do with newtonian gravity in any limit_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the authors are grateful to raul vera and guillermo a. gonzlez for helpful discussions .
jpm also acknowledges the loc members , ruth , raul , jesus and jos for a very enjoyable conference .
99 w. b. bonnor and m- a. p. martins , classical and quantum gravity , 8 , 727 ( 1991 ) ; m. a. p. martins , gen .
( 1996 ) 1309 .
l. a. anchordoqui , j. d. edelstein , c. nunez and g. s. birman , arxiv : gr - qc/9509018 .
f. s. n. lobo and j. p. mimoso , arxiv:0907.3811 [ gr - qc ] .
m. s. morris and k. s. thorne , am .
j. phys .
* 56 * , 395 ( 1988 ) . h. a. buchdahl , phys .
115 , 1325 ( 1959 ) .
|
ignored metric vacuum solutions degenerate solutions @xcite @xmath0 axisymmetric solutions 2-dimensional spheres replaced by pseudo - spheres @xmath1 surfaces negative constant curvature surfaces revolution around axis @xmath2 represents rotation angle vacuum case @xmath3 @xmath4 constant static solution holds for @xmath5 coordinate singularity at @xmath6 @xmath7 vanishes becomes @xmath8 at @xmath6) complementary domain exterior schwarzschild solution region @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 metric coefficients swap signs defining @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 parametric definitions @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 case bianchi iii axisymetric universe pseudo - spherical coordinates @xmath18 spatial part metric related to hyperboloid @xmath19 4-dimensional flat space @xmath20\{\rm d}r^2 + r^2 \left}u^2+^2u}v^2 prime stands for differentiation @xmath21 @xmath22recast metric_constnc into @xmath23{\rm d}\tau^2\left\bar r}\right)^2\ ^4\left\bar r\right) 1}]{\rm d}\bar{r}^2\ r^2{\rm d}u^2\sinh^2{u} d}v^2\right{isotrop3}\end{aligned} analogue isotropic form schwarzschild solution spatial surfaces flat metric not euclidean 3dim spatial metric @xmath24 foliated by surfaces negative curvature corresponds to @xmath26 recover newtonian weak - field limit analysing radial motion test particles equation @xmath27 @xmath28 @xmath29 constants motion defined by @xmath30 @xmath31 @xmath32 represent energy angular momentum per unit mass define potential @xmath33 repulsive crosses @xmath21-axis at @xmath6 high values minimum at @xmath34 minimum outside @xmath6 divide test particle repulsive potential cross event horizon at @xmath6 attracted by mass minimum or infinityhinted non - existence clear newtonian analogue related to mass sources at @xmath8 no definite conclusions drawn natural extension solution metric_constnc - antiscwarz add exotic matter static pseudo - spherically symmetric traversable wormhole solutions @xcite consider metric metric_constnc by @xmath35 @xmath36 coordinate @xmath21 decreases from @xmath4 to minimum @xmath37 representing location throat wormhole @xmath38 increases from @xmath37 back to @xmath4 condition @xmath39 imposes @xmath40 contrary to morris - thorne counterpart @xcite solution provides stress - energy scenario @xmath41{radialpwh}\pi{lateralpwh}{aligned @xmath42 energy density @xmath43 radial pressure @xmath44 pressure measured in tangential directions radial pressure positive at throat @xmath45 contrary to morris - thorne wormhole radial tension at throat needed sustain wormholemathematics embedding imposes @xmath46 at throat implies negative energy density see @xcite difference to morris - thorne wormhole negative energy densities not necessary equations of state considered in @xcite refer reader theorem by buchdahl @xcite establishes reciprocity between static solution einstein s vacuum field equations one - parameter solutions einstein s equations massless scalar field transformed einstein frame scalar - tensor gravity theories described by @xmath47 + {matter gr plus massles scalar field coupled to matter fields different scalar - tensor theories correspond to different couplings absence of matter use buchdahl s theorem metric metric_constnc derive scalar - tensor solution @xmath48 @xmath49 and @xmath50 reduces anti - schwarzschild metric metric_constnc ) gr limit @xmath51 @xmath52 @xmath53 constant reverting @xmath54 @xmath55 recast solution in original frame scalar - field coupled to geometry content vacuum jordan frame@xmath6 limit is no longer just a coordinate singularity, but true singularity verified from analysis of curvature invariants . in einstein frame occurs because energy density of scalar field diverges likewise in schwarzschild case@xcite . importance st - solution has no newtonian limit ( as its gr limit not one ) implies usual parametrized post - newtonian formalism assesses departures of modified gravity theories from gr not hold for this class of metrics ( see @xcite ) outlined exotic features of vacuum static solution with pseudo - spherical foliation of space revealed existence of generalised wormholes derived extension to scalar - tensor gravity theories fundamental feature of these solutions is absence of newtonian weak field limit reminds us of quotation from john barrow @xcite _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ miracle of general relativity is purely mathematical assembly of second - rank tensors should have anything to do with newtonian gravity in any limit_._ _ _ _ _ _ authors grateful to raul vera guillermo a. gonzlez for helpful discussions . jpm acknowledges loc members, ruth , raul jesus jos for enjoyable conference . 99 w. b. bonnor m- a. p. martins , classical and quantum gravity , 8 , 727 ( 1991 ) ; m. a. p. martins , gen . ( 1996 ) 1309 . l. a. anchordoqui , j. d. edelstein , c. nunez g. s. birman , arxiv : gr - qc/9509018 . f. s. n. lobo j. p. mimoso , arxiv:0907.3811 [ gr - qc ] . m. s. morris k. s. thorne , am . j. phys . * 56 * , 395 ( 1988 ) . h. a. buchdahl , phys . 115 , 1325 ( 1959 ) .
| 0.351685
| 2,403
| 1,264
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,434
|
the issue of consistent power counting in baryon chiral perturbation theory is revisited .
address = institut fr kernphysik , johannes gutenberg universitt , mainz d-55099 , germany
|
the powerful effective - field theory ( eft ) method allows for a perturbative treatment of the strong interaction at low energies @xcite .
the perturbative expansion is made in powers of energy and momentum of the lightest relevant degrees of freedom ( pions , nucleons , etc . ) , rather than in powers of the coupling constant as is usually done in ( renormalizable ) field theory .
to illustrate the idea , imagine we would like to describe the properties of cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) , i.e. , a gas of cold photons . the proper theory for this system is of course qed , and the interaction of photons arises there through the electron loops .
the typical energy of a cmb photon is 1 mev , which is much smaller ( by six orders of magnitude ! ) than the electron mass @xmath0 mev .
a spontaneous pair production is therefore excluded ; the fermion degrees of freedom are too heavy and will never appear explicitly in this system .
it is possible to eliminate them from the description altogether by integrating out the fermion fields and expanding the result in powers of inverse electron mass .
another way of doing that is to write an `` effective theory '' containing only the relevant degrees of freedom , _ viz .
_ , the photon field @xmath1 . the most general lagrangian of such theory would begin with = -f_f^ + a_1 _ f _ ^f^ + c_1 ( f_f^)^2 + c_2 ( f_f^)^2 + , where @xmath2 is the field strength and @xmath3 is its dual . the first term in this lagrangian is just the free electromagnetic ( e.m . ) radiation and the rest represents the effect of electron loops at low energies .
even if this effect is not known to us precisely , we know that it will satisfy all the symmetries of qed , such as the lorentz- and discrete symmetries , as well as the electromagnetic gauge invariance . these symmetries allow the effective theory to be written in terms of @xmath4 only , and as the result , the lagrangian can be ordered in powers of derivatives of the photon field .
a derivative translates into the momentum , or energy , and hence the derivative expansion translates into the expansion in energy .
the parameters of the effective theory , in this case @xmath5 s and @xmath6 s , must be expressed in terms of the qed parameters electron mass and charge . this can be achieved by matching " : calculating the same quantity in the effective theory and in qed , and equating the results .
for example , @xmath7 can be determined from the vacuum polarization , while @xmath8 and @xmath9 can be matched at the level of light - by - light scattering amplitudes .
the effective framework is especially useful when the underlying theory is non - perturbative , as it is in the case of qcd at low energies . in our example
, the hadronic effects in the photon gas can still be presented in the form of .
it is still hard to calculate from first principles what the hadronic contribution to the low - energy constants is , but we can measure it ! for example , the constants @xmath8 and @xmath9 , describing the low - energy photon self - interactions , can be related to linearly - polarized cross - sections of photon - photon fusion , @xmath10 and @xmath11 @xcite : c_1 = _ 0^ s , c_2 = _ 0^ s , where @xmath12 is the total invariant energy of the @xmath13 collision . from this
we know already that these constants are positive definite and so the low - energy photons attract . taking the cross - sections of @xmath14hadrons , we can obtain the hadronic contribution to these quantities , and with that we can calculate the most important hadronic effects in the photon gas .
i have to note though that the polarized @xmath13 fusion cross - sections have not yet been measured and so this example for now is [ line - through]*academic * served for illustration purpose only .
if we replace photons with pions in the above example , and electrons with quarks and gluons , we must end up with the chiral eft , commonly referred to as chiral perturbation theory ( @xmath15pt ) .
the name @xmath15pt was originally assigned to the expansion of static quantities , such as masses , electromagnetic moments , in powers of the pion mass @xcite . in modern language , @xmath15pt is a simultaneous expansion in powers of pion mass and momentum the chiral expansion .
the break - down scale of this expansion is believed to be set at around 1 gev .
introducing the nucleon into the picture , in the words of first paper attempting it @xcite , complicates life a lot .
" first of all , the nucleon is heavy , and its mass seems to pop out in the places it should nt , violating some power - counting arguments ; we will see one example in a moment .
secondly , the nucleon is easily excited into the @xmath16 , the excitation energy being @xmath17 mev . in attempts to find a systematic treatment of these issues , several different versions of baryon @xmath15pt
were born : * heavy - baryon @xmath15pt ( hb@xmath15pt ) @xcite , where in addition to the chiral expansion , a semi - relativistic expansion in the inverse nucleon mass is made .
* infrared regularization ( ir - b@xmath15pt ) @xcite , where the negative - energy pole is removed from the baryon propagators .
* extended on - mass - shell scheme ( eoms - b@xmath15pt ) @xcite , which recognizes that certain renormalizations must be done to implement consistent power counting .
the chiral expansion of the nucleon mass to order @xmath18 is given by m_n = - 4 m_^2 + ^(3)_n , where @xmath19 and @xmath20 are low - energy constants ( lecs ) from the chiral effective lagrangian , and @xmath21 is the nucleon self - energy .
the nucleon self - energy may have ( infinitely ) many chiral - loop contributions of the type shown in , however the weinberg s power counting tells us that a graph with @xmath22 loops , @xmath23 pion and @xmath24 nucleon lines , @xmath25 vertices from the lagrangian of order @xmath26 , contributes to order @xmath27 , with n = 4l - 2n_-n_n + _ k k v_k .
the leading @xmath28 couplings ( pseudovector , weinberg tomozawa , etc . ) are of the first order ( @xmath29 ) and therefore , to order @xmath18 only the graph ( a ) contributes . evaluating this graph yields @xcite : ^(3)_n & = & \ { - l_m_n^3 + ( 1-l _ ) m_n m_^2 + & & - m_^3 - } .
where @xmath30 exhibits the uv divergence as @xmath31 , with @xmath32 being the number of space - time dimensions , @xmath33 the scale of dimensional regularization , and @xmath34 the euler s constant .
for simplicity we have assumed the physical values for the parameters entering the loop : @xmath35 mev , @xmath36 , @xmath37 mev ; the difference with the chiral - limit values leads to higher - order effects .
the expression is an exact result of a textbook calculation and so it is disappointing to see that it seems to invalidate the power counting formula .
the power counting estimates this loop is of @xmath18 size , in this case @xmath38 , but the first two terms are obviously larger . on the other hand
, this expression begs for a renormalization .
we do have the two low - energy constants in , which can be renormalized to absorb the uv divergencies and remove the dependence of the nucleon mass on the renormalization scale .
however , only having @xmath39 in , which corresponds to the @xmath40 scheme applied in the original paper @xcite , does not work : there is the @xmath41 term remaining , which violates the power counting .
the essence of the eoms @xcite is to absorb this term too in the course of the renormalization . as the result we have , & & : m_n = - 4 m_^2 - \ { + } , + & & : m_n = - 4 m_^2 - \ { ( - ) + + & & + ( l_-1 ) } , + & & : m_n = - 4 m_^2 - , where @xmath19 and @xmath20 are now the renormalized ( physical ) values of these parameters , and where , for comparison , i displayed also the @xmath18 result of the ir and hb versions of b@xmath15pt .
the eoms result is consistent with power counting and the @xmath40 is not , but can one renormalization scheme be better than the other ? in eft it can .
observe that the whole difference between the two schemes at this order is expressed as the difference in the value of @xmath8 : ^ ( ) - = ^ ( ) suppose now we match @xmath20 to qcd by fitting , for instance , to the lattice qcd data .
in the two schemes the fit will be identical but the values for the lec will differ according to .
it is still possible that both @xmath8 are of _ natural _ size , i.e. , of oder of one in gev units .
now , after calculating to one order higher , we would refit the data and find a new value of the lec . in eoms
the value of @xmath8 would not change much from one order to another , since @xmath42 as a function of @xmath43 would indeed change only in the higher - order terms . in the @xmath40 scheme the value of @xmath8 could change a lot , since any loop can produce a large shift in that @xmath44 term .
the latter situation is not satisfactory , especially if we want to have our lecs to represent some physical quantities . for example
, we would like @xmath19 to be the nucleon mass in the chiral limit , while @xmath20 could represent the value of the @xmath45-term in the chiral limit . in this case
the eoms is indeed favored over the @xmath40 .
looking back at the other results displayed in , we ought to dismiss the ir scheme for not having the correct analytic properties .
the non - analyticity of the square root at @xmath46 is canceled in the eoms due to the factor of @xmath47 , and is not canceled in the ir , because @xmath48 .
of course , at small pion masses this pathology is barely seen , as the ir result is different from the eoms by the following term alone : m_n = - \ { + ( l_-1 ) } .
one can argue that this term is of order @xmath49 , which is beyond the accuracy of this calculations .
but then the question is why do we need this term at all , especially when it occurs as a result of violation of the analytic properties .
we finally come to the point that the eoms expression in contains an infinite amount of terms which are nominally of higher order in @xmath50 , while in the hb expression these terms are happily dropped .
i deliberately used the word nominally " , because a term going as @xmath51 is not necessarily smaller then a @xmath38 term depends on the coefficients .
one assumes the coefficients to be all of natural size , but is this always true ?
we can see this to be pretty much true for our case .
expanding the factor in curly brackets in the eoms expression of , we find \ { } = + ( -1 ) - + o(m_^3 ) , and hence the hb result , @xmath52 , is a very good _
but then there are other examples .
the magnetic polarizability of the proton @xmath53 at order @xmath18 in b@xmath15pt expands as @xcite : _ p = \ { + + - + o(m_^2 ) } .
one can see that the nominally - higher - order terms have unnaturally large coefficients and can not be neglected .
the same situation is observed in the other polarizabilities of the nucleon . in such cases
the hb expansion fails .
a comprehensive comparison of the various schemes has recently been done by geng et al .
@xcite in the context of the su(3 ) b@xmath15pt study of the baryon magnetic moments .
the eoms comes out to be favored by this study as well .
as for the other recent applications of b@xmath15pt in the on - mass - shell scheme , i would like to mention a next - to - next - to - leading order calculation of the proton compton scattering @xcite , and of the nucleon and @xmath16-isobar electromagnetic form factors @xcite .
9 s. weinberg , physica a * 96 * , 327 ( 1979 ) .
j. gasser and h. leutwyler , annals phys .
* 158 * ( 1984 ) 142 .
v. pascalutsa and m. vanderhaeghen , phys .
lett . *
105 * , 201603 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1008.1088 ] .
h. pagels , phys .
* 16 * , 219 ( 1975 ) .
j. gasser , m. e. sainio and a. svarc , nucl .
b * 307 * , 779 ( 1988 ) .
e. jenkins and a. v. manohar , phys .
b * 255 * , 558 ( 1991 ) .
t. becher and h. leutwyler , eur .
j. c * 9 * , 643 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9901384 ] .
t. fuchs , j. gegelia , g. japaridze and s. scherer , phys .
d * 68 * , 056005 ( 2003 ) .
t. ledwig , v. pascalutsa and m. vanderhaeghen , phys .
b * 690 * , 129 ( 2010 ) .
v. bernard , n. kaiser and u .- g .
meiner , phys .
lett . * 67 * , 1515 ( 1991 ) .
v. lensky , v. pascalutsa , eur .
j. c * 65 * , 195 ( 2010 ) .
l. s. geng , j. martin camalich , m. j. vicente vacas , phys .
* b676 * , 63 - 68 ( 2009 ) . l. s. geng , j. martin camalich , m. j. vicente vacas , phys .
rev . * d80 * , 034027 ( 2009 ) .
t. ledwig , j. martin - camalich , v. pascalutsa , m. vanderhaeghen , arxiv:1105.0468 ; in preparation .
|
effective - field theory method allows perturbative treatment strong interaction at low energies @xcite perturbative expansion in powers energy momentum lightest degrees freedom pions nucleons powers coupling constant field theory properties of cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) gas of cold photons theory system is qed interaction photons through electron loops typical energy of cmb photon is 1 mev smaller six orders magnitude than electron mass @xmath0 mev spontaneous pair production excluded fermion degrees of freedom too heavy appear possible to eliminate by integrating fermion fields expanding in powers inverse electron mass write effective theory containing relevant degrees of freedom photon field @xmath1 lagrangian theory with = -f_f^ + a_1 _ f _ ^f^ + c_1 ( f_f^)^2 + c_2 ( f_f^)^2 + @xmath2 is field strength @xmath3 dual first term is free electromagnetic radiation rest represents effect of electron loops at low energies effect symmetries of qed - electromagnetic gauge invariance symmetries allow effective theory @xmath4 lagrangian ordered in derivatives photon field derivative translates into momentum energy derivative expansion translates energy parameters effective theory @xmath5 s @xmath6 s expressed qed parameters electron mass charge achieved by matching calculating same quantity qed equating results @xmath7 determined from vacuum polarization @xmath8 @xmath9 matched light - by - light scattering amplitudes effective framework useful when theory non - perturbative qcd at low energies hadronic effects in photon gas presented hard to calculate hadronic contribution to low - energy constants but can measure constants @xmath8 @xmath9 low - energy photon interactions related to linearly - polarized cross - sections of photon - fusion @xmath10 @xmath11 c_1 = c_2 = s @xmath12 is total invariant energy of @xmath13 collision constants positive definite low - energy photons attract cross - sections of @xmath14hadrons obtain hadronic contribution quantities calculate important hadronic effects in photon gaspolarized @xmath13 fusion cross - sections not measured example is*academic for illustration only replace photons with pions electrons with quarks gluons end with chiral eft chiral perturbation theory ( @xmath15pt ) name @xmath15pt assigned to expansion of static quantities masses electromagnetic moments in powers of pion mass @xcite simultaneous expansion in powers of pion mass momentum chiral expansion break - down scale at around 1 gev introducing nucleon complicates life nucleon heavy mass pop out places violating power - counting arguments nucleon easily excited into @xmath16 excitation energy being @xmath17 mev versions of baryon @xmath15pt born heavy - baryon @xmath15pt @xcite semi - relativistic expansion in inverse nucleon mass infrared regularization ( ir - b@xmath15pt ) @xcite negative - energy pole removed from baryon propagators extended on - mass - shell scheme ( - b@xmath15pt ) @xcite renormalizations implement consistent power countingexpansion nucleon mass to @xmath18 by m_n = - 4 m_^2 + ^(3)_n @xmath19 low - energy constants lagrangian nucleon self - energy chiral - loop contributions weinberg s power counting graph with @xmath22 loops pion nucleon lines vertices from @xmath26 contributes to @xmath27 n = 4l - 2n_-n_n + k k v_k @xmath28 couplings first order @xmath29 ) @xmath18 graph a ) contributes graph yields @xcite : ^(3)_n & = \ { - l_m_n^3 + ( 1-l _ ) m_n m_^2 + & & - m_^3 - } @xmath30 uv divergence as @xmath31 @xmath32 space - time dimensions scale dimensional regularization euler s constant physical values for parameters @xmath35 mev difference with chiral - limit values leads to higher - order effects expression textbook calculation power counting formula power counting estimates loop @xmath18 size @xmath38 first two terms largerexpression begs for renormalization have two low - energy constants can be renormalized to absorb uv divergencies remove dependence nucleon mass on renormalization scale @xmath39 corresponds to @xmath40 scheme original paper @xcite work @xmath41 term remaining violates power counting essence eoms @xcite to absorb this term renormalization result m_n = - 4 m_^2 -_n - 4 m_^2 - - 4 m_^2 @xmath19 and @xmath20 are renormalized values of parameters comparison displayed @xmath18 result of ir hb versions b@xmath15pt eoms result consistent with power counting @xmath40 not can one renormalization scheme better other ? difference between two schemes expressed as difference in value of @xmath8 : ^ ( ) - = match @xmath20 to qcd by fitting to lattice qcd data two schemes fit identical but values for lec differ possible both @xmath8 are of natural _ size in gev units after calculating one order higher refit data find new value of lec in eoms value @xmath8 change order @xmath42 function of @xmath43 only in higher - order terms in @xmath40 scheme value @xmath8 could change loop large shift in @xmath44 term latter situation not satisfactory lecs represent physical quantities @xmath19 nucleon mass in chiral limit @xmath20 represent value @xmath45-term in chiral limit eoms favored over @xmath40 dismiss ir scheme for not correct analytic properties non - analyticity of square root at @xmath46 canceled in eoms due to factor @xmath47 not canceled in ir because @xmath48 at small pion masses pathology barely seen ir result different from eoms by term : m_n = - \ { + ( l_-1 ) } argue term of order @xmath49 beyond accuracy calculations why need this term violation of analytic properties eoms expression contains infinite terms nominally higher order in @xmath50 in hb expression terms dropped term @xmath51 not necessarily smaller then @xmath38 term depends on coefficients coefficients natural size always true ? true for our caseexpanding factor curly brackets eoms expression \ { } = + ( -1 ) - + o(m_^3 ) hb result @xmath52 good other examples magnetic polarizability proton @xmath53 @xmath18 b@xmath15pt expands @xcite p = \ { + - + o(m_^2 ) } higher - order terms large coefficients neglected same situation other polarizabilities nucleon hb expansion fails comparison schemes geng et al @xcite b@xmath15pt study baryon magnetic moments eoms favored other applications b@xmath15pt on - mass - shell scheme leading order calculation proton compton scattering @xcite nucleon @xmath16-isobar electromagnetic form factors @xcite weinberg physica 96 327 ( 1979 ) gasser leutwyler annals phys . 158 1984 ) pascalutsa vanderhaeghen phys 105 201603 ( 2010 ) arxiv:1008.1088 pagels phys 16 219 ( 1975 ) gasser sainio svarc nucl 307 779 ( 1988 ) jenkins manohar phys 255 558 ( 1991 )becher h leutwyler 9 643 1999 ) hep ph/9901384 fuchs gegelia japaridze scherer phys 68 056005 ( 2003 ) ledwig v. pascalutsa m vanderhaeghen phys 690 129 ( 2010 ) bernard n kaiser meiner phys 67 1515 ( 1991 ) v lensky v. pascalutsa 65 195 ( 2010 ) s. geng j. camalich vicente vacas phys b676 63 - 68 ( 2009 ) geng camalich vicente phys d80 034027 ( 2009 ) ledwig j. - camalich v. pascalutsa m. vanderhaeghen arxiv:1105.0468 preparation
| 0.503878
| 3,408
| 1,755
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,442
|
an updated next - to - leading order ( nlo ) qcd analysis of all presently available longitudinally polarized deep - inelastic scattering ( dis ) data is presented in the framework of the radiative parton model .
|
many new or improved measurements of the spin asymmetry @xmath0},\ ] ] @xmath1 , in longitudinally polarized dis off various different targets @xmath2 have become available in the past two years : e142 , e143 , and smc have presented their final data sets @xcite , and new results from hermes , e154 , and e155 have been reported recently @xcite . since none of these measurements were included in our original nlo qcd analysis @xcite , it seems to be appropriate to reanalyse these data within the framework of @xcite . in nlo the polarized structure function @xmath3 in ( [ eq : a1 ] ) reads ( suppressing all @xmath4 and @xmath5 dependence ) @xmath6\,\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath7 are the spin - dependent wilson coefficients and the symbol @xmath8 denotes the usual convolution in @xmath4 space . from ( [ eq : g1 ] ) it is obvious that inclusive dis data @xcite can reveal only information on @xmath9 but neither on @xmath10 _ and _ @xmath11 nor on @xmath12 , which enters ( [ eq : g1 ] ) only as an @xmath13 correction .
thus one can either stick to a comprehensive analysis of polarized dis @xcite or one has to impose certain _ assumptions _ about the flavor decomposition in order to be able to estimate processes other than dis for upcoming experiments like rhic .
as in @xcite , and other more recent qcd analyses @xcite , we follow the latter option .
due to the lack of space we shall be rather brief and concentrate only on the most important changes since @xcite .
the limited amount of data demands a reasonably simple , but flexible enough ansatz for the polarized densities such as @xmath14 with @xmath15 .
note that in @xcite we actually used @xmath16 in ( [ eq : ansatz ] ) instead of @xmath17 and @xmath18 , however the positivity constraint @xmath19 which we want to exploit in our analysis , does not necessarily hold for the valence densities .
of course , the bound ( [ eq : pos ] ) is strictly valid only in lo and is subject to nlo corrections @xcite because the @xmath20 become unphysical , scheme - dependent objects in nlo .
however the corrections are not very pronounced , in particular at large @xmath4 @xcite , the only region where ( [ eq : pos ] ) imposes some restrictions in practice .
we therefore use ( [ eq : pos ] ) also in nlo . to further simplify ( [ eq : ansatz ] )
we _ assume _ that @xmath21 , fix @xmath22 by the relations between the first moments of the non - singlet combinations @xmath23 and the @xmath24 and @xmath25 values ( using the updated value for @xmath26 @xcite ) , and take @xmath27 .
in the latter relation we _ choose _ @xmath28 ( @xmath29 symmetric sea ) , but similarly agreeable fits are obtained , e.g. , for @xmath30 ( see also @xcite ) , as well as by using an independent @xmath4 shape for @xmath31 , reflecting the above mentioned uncertainty in the flavor separation . for the unpolarized distributions @xmath32 in ( [ eq : ansatz ] ) and ( [ eq : pos ] )
we use the updated grv densities @xcite and also adopt their values for the input scale @xmath33 ( @xmath34 in nlo ) and @xmath35 .
note that in @xcite the rg equation for @xmath36 is now solved exactly instead of using the approximative nlo formula ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) , which is more appropriate at low @xmath5 where many of the polarized data lie . to fix the remaining parameters in ( [ eq : ansatz ] ) we perform fits to the directly measured spin asymmetry ( [ eq : a1 ] ) in lo _ and _ nlo , which is mandatory if one wants to adopt these distributions in a consistent analysis of the perturbative stability of polarized processes .
also most mc programs only contain lo matrix elements , and hence lo densities are more appropriate . apart from the above outlined ` standard scenario ' fit , equally good fits can be performed in a ` valence scenario ' ( see @xcite ) which is based on the assumption @xcite that the @xmath37 values fix only the valence parts of @xmath23 .
the main feature of such a model is the possibility to describe the data with a vanishing strange sea . due to the lack of space we do not pursue this scenario here and restrict ourselves in what follows to the results obtained in the nlo @xmath38 ` standard scenario ' framework .
a comparison of our new nlo fit with the available @xmath39 data @xcite and with our previous analysis @xcite is presented in fig . 1
. the total @xmath40 values of the new and old fits are 147.4 and 183 , respectively , for 185 data points and adding statistical and systematical errors in quadrature .
as can be seen , sizeable differences appear only in case of the neutron asymmetry , which leaves its footprint also in the individual parton densities @xmath20 shown in fig . 2 . since the neutron data mainly probe @xmath41 , the most prominent changes are observed here .
the differences in the sea and in @xmath12 only reflect the fact that they are constrained to a much lesser extent by the data than @xmath17 and @xmath18 .
in particular @xmath12 remains to be hardly constrained at all , which is not surprising due to the lack of any direct information on @xmath12 so far .
therefore we show in fig . 2 also the results of two other fits , which are based on additional constraints on @xmath12 .
for the ` @xmath42 ' fit we start from a vanishing gluon input in ( [ eq : ansatz ] ) , and the ` static @xmath12 ' is chosen in such a way that its first moment becomes independent of @xmath5 .
this can be achieved by setting @xmath43 and yields in lo @xmath44 ( see @xcite ) , where @xmath45 is the total helicity carried by quarks ( the relation is only subject to a small nlo correction ) .
both gluons give also excellent fits to the available data and do not affect the results for @xmath17 and @xmath18 ( see fig . 2 ) .
in fact we can obtain fits without any significant change in @xmath40 for @xmath46 in the range -0.3 0.6 ( our best fit has 0.28 , corresponding to @xmath47 ) . the uncertainty in @xmath12
is compatible to the one found in @xcite , although our gluons extend also to slightly negative first moments .
it is interesting to observe that for our best fit gluon the spin of the nucleon @xmath48 is dominantly carried by quarks and gluons at our input scale @xmath33 , and only during the @xmath5 evolution a large negative @xmath49 is being built up in order to compensate for the strong rise of @xmath50 , see fig . 5 in @xcite .
for the ` static @xmath12 ' the situation is completely different : by construction the quark and gluon contributions to ( [ eq : spinsum ] ) cancel each other implying that for _ all _ values of @xmath5 the spin is entirely of angular momentum origin , contrary to what is intuitively expected .
inevitably the large uncertainty in @xmath12 implies that the small @xmath4 behaviour of @xmath3 is completely uncertain and not predictable ( see fig . 3 in @xcite ) , which translates also into a large theoretical error from the @xmath51 extrapolation when calculating first moments of @xmath3 .
taking our best fit we obtain @xmath52 and @xmath53 at @xmath54 in agreement with a recent smc qcd analysis @xcite .
the two challenging questions concerning polarized parton densities are still @xmath12 and the flavor decomposition .
recent semi - inclusive dis results @xcite may help to unravel the latter , but major progress , in particular on @xmath12 , can be only expected from rhic .
a realization of the optional upgrade of hera to a polarized collider would be also very helpful to gain more insight into the spin structure of the nucleon _ and _ the photon , with the latter being completely unmeasured so far .
it is a pleasure to thank m. glck , e. reya , and w. vogelsang for a fruitful collaboration .
anthony et al . , e142 collab . , phys .
d 54 ( 1996 ) 6620 ; k. abe et al .
, e143 collab .
d 58 ( 1998 ) 112003 ; b. adeva et al . , sm collab . ,
d 58 ( 1998 ) 112001 .
k. abe et al . , e154 collab . , phys .
79 ( 1997 ) 26 ; k. ackerstaff et al .
, hermes collab .
b 404 ( 1997 ) 383 ; a. airapetian et al . , hermes collab . , phys . lett .
b 442 ( 1998 ) 484 ; p.l .
anthony et al . , e155 collab . , slac - pub-8041 , 1999 ( phys .
rev . lett . ) .
m. glck , e. reya , m. stratmann , and w. vogelsang , phys .
d 53 ( 1996 ) 4775 . g. altarelli , r. ball , s. forte , and g. ridolfi , nucl . phys .
b 496 ( 1997 ) 337 ; acta phys . polon .
b 29 ( 1998 ) 1145 .
b. adeva et al . , sm collab . , phys .
d 58 ( 1998 ) 112002 . d. de florian , o.a .
sampayo , and r. sassot , phys .
d 57 ( 1998 ) 5803 . e. leader , a.v .
siderov , and d.b .
stamenov , phys .
d 58 ( 1998 ) 114028 .
g. altarelli , s. forte , and g. ridolfi , nucl .
b 534 ( 1998 ) 277 .
particle data group , eur .
j. c 3 ( 1998 ) 1 .
m. glck , e. reya , and a. vogt , eur .
j. c 5 ( 1998 ) 461 . j. lichtenstadt and h.j .
lipkin , phys .
b 353 ( 1995 ) 119 .
m. stratmann , in proceedings of the ` 2nd topical workshop on deep inelastic scattering off polarized targets ' , zeuthen , 1997 , j. blmlein and w .- d .
nowak ( eds . ) , p. 94 .
m. ruh ( hermes ) , these proceedings .
|
new measurements spin asymmetry @xmath0 @xmath1 longitudinally polarized dis off targets @xmath2 available past two years e142 e143 smc presented final data sets @xcite new results from hermes e154 e155 reported recently @xcite measurements included in original nlo qcd analysis @xcite reanalyse data framework @xcite nlo polarized structure function @xmath3 reads @xmath4 @xmath5 dependence @xmath6\{aligned} @xmath7 are spin - dependent wilson coefficients symbol @xmath8 denotes usual convolution in @xmath4 space inclusive dis data @xcite reveal only information on @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 only @xmath13 correction stick comprehensive analysis of polarized dis @xcite or impose assumptions about flavor decomposition estimate processes other dis for upcoming experiments follow latter option lack of space concentrate on important changes since @xcite limited data demands simple flexible ansatz for polarized densities @xmath14 @xmath15 in @xcite used @xmath16 ansatz instead of @xmath17 positivity constraint @xmath19 hold for valence densities bound ( [ eq : pos ] ) valid in lo subject to nlo corrections @xcite @xmath20 unphysical scheme - dependent objects in nlo corrections not pronounced at large @xmath4 @xcite region eq : pos restrictions use [ eq : pos ] ) in nlo simplify assume @xmath21 fix @xmath22 relations between first moments non - singlet combinations @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 values updated value for @xmath26 @xcite take @xmath27 choose @xmath28 ( @xmath29 symmetric sea ) agreeable fits obtained for @xmath30 independent @xmath4 shape for @xmath31 reflecting uncertainty in flavor separation unpolarized distributions @xmath32 eq ansatz pos use updated grv densities @xcite adopt values for input scale @xmath33 @xmath34 @xmath35 @xcite rg equation for @xmath36 solved instead approximative nlo formula appropriate at low @xmath5 polarized datafix remaining parameters eq : ansatz ] perform fits to measured spin asymmetry eq : a1 ] ) in lo _ nlo mandatory distributions analysis perturbative stability polarized processes mc programs contain lo matrix elements lo densities appropriate standard scenario good fits in valence scenario ' @xcite based assumption @xmath37 values fix valence parts of @xmath23 describe data with vanishing strange sea lack of space pursue scenario restrict to results nlo @xmath38 standard scenario framework comparison new nlo fit @xmath39 data @xcite previous analysis presented in fig . 1 total @xmath40 values new old fits 147.4 and 183 for 185 data points statistical systematical errors in quadrature sizeable differences neutron asymmetry leaves footprint in individual parton densities fig . 2 neutron data probe @xmath41 prominent changes observed here differences in sea @xmath12 reflect constrained lesser by data than @xmath17 @xmath18 @xmath12 hardly constrained lack direct information @xmath12 show fig . 2 results of two other fits based on additional constraints on @xmath12@xmath42 fit start from vanishing gluon input static @xmath12 chosen first moment independent of @xmath5 achieved setting @xmath43 yields @xmath44 @xmath45 total helicity carried by quarks relation subject to small nlo correction gluons give excellent fits affect results @xmath17 @xmath18 fig . 2 obtain fits without change in @xmath40 @xmath46 range -0.3 0.6 best fit 0.28 @xmath47 ) uncertainty in @xmath12 compatible to @xcite gluons extend to slightly negative first moments best fit gluon spin of nucleon @xmath48 dominantly carried by quarks gluons at input scale @xmath33 during @xmath5 evolution large negative @xmath49 built up compensate for strong rise @xmath50 fig 5 static @xmath12 situation different quark gluon contributions cancel each other @xmath5 spin angular momentum origin large uncertainty in @xmath12 implies small @xmath4 behaviour @xmath3 uncertain not predictable fig 3 large theoretical error from @xmath51 extrapolation calculating first moments @xmath3best fit obtain @xmath52 smc qcd analysis @xcite questions polarized parton densities @xmath12 flavor decomposition - inclusive dis results unravel major progress @xmath12 from rhic optional upgrade hera polarized collider insight spin structure nucleon photon latter unmeasured thank m. glck e. reya w. vogelsang collaboration anthony e142 collab phys . d 54 ( 1996 ) 6620 k abe e143 58 1998 ) 112003 adeva 58 1998 ) 112001 abe e154 collab phys . 79 1997 ) 26 ackerstaff hermes collab 404 ( 1997 ) 383 airapetian hermes collab phys . lett 442 ( 1998 ) 484 anthony e155 collab slac - pub-8041 1999 phys m. glck e. reya m. stratmann w. vogelsang phys . d 53 ( 1996 ) 4775. altarelli r. ball s. forte g. ridolfi nucl. phys . b 496 ( 1997 ) 337 acta phys .29 ( 1998 ) 1145 adeva sm collab phys 58 1998 ) 112002 de florian sampayo sassot 57 ( 1998 ) 5803 leader siderov stamenov phys 58 1998 ) 114028 altarelli forte ridolfi nucl 534 ( 1998 ) 277 particle data group 3 ( 1998 ) 1 glck reya. vogt 5 ( 1998 ) 461 lichtenstadt lipkin phys 353 ( 1995 ) 119 stratmann proceedings 2nd workshop deep inelastic scattering polarized targets zeuthen 1997 j blmlein nowak eds p. 94 ruh ( hermes ) proceedings
| 0.35358
| 2,536
| 1,339
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,444
|
we present a method for creating a monopole in an antiferromagnetic spin-1 bose - einstein condensate . the required phase engineering of the multicomponent condensate is achieved using light shifts , which depend on both the magnetic substate @xmath0 and polarization of the incident laser beam .
|
since the experimental realization of bose - einstein condensates ( bec s ) in 1995 @xcite , a wide variety of properties and effects in bec s has been studied . among the major topics of interest
are topological defects such as vortices @xcite and solitons @xcite .
more recently , the realization of bec s in optical traps @xcite has opened up interesting new avenues of research in this area .
this development makes it possible to create multicomponent condensates where all magnetic substates @xmath0 are trapped .
the resulting spin degree of freedom permits the existence of topological defects that can not appear in scalar condensates , such as skyrmions @xcite and monopoles @xcite .
important properties of monopoles , such as stability and dynamics , have already been examined @xcite . here
we propose an explicit method for creating a monopole in bec s , focusing on the experimentally relevant case of @xmath1 .
our proposal extends the method of `` phase imprinting '' used to generate topological defects in scalar condensates @xcite .
in particular , we demonstrate that the energy shift experienced by each component of the condensate depends on both @xmath0 and the polarization of the laser beam , and that by applying a sequence of different polarizations the phases of the components can be engineered in a broad manner .
a spin-1 bec can be described by the condensate wavefunction @xmath2 , where @xmath3 is the total density and @xmath4 is a normalized spinor describing the local spin of the condensate . for an anti - ferromagnetic bec such as @xmath5 ,
the ground state spinor is given by @xcite [ eq : ground ] _
g()= ( c 0 + 1 + 0 ) . the spinor corresponding to a monopole has the form @xcite [ eq : monopolespinor ] _ m ( ) = ( c -m_x()+im_y ( ) + m_z ( ) + m_x()+im_y ( ) ) .
@xmath6 is a unit vector field that describes the local rotation of the ground state spinor . by considering the energy and winding number of such a condensate
, it can be shown @xcite that @xmath7 uniquely characterizes the monopole structure .
we see that @xmath6 assumes the familiar hedgehog structure associated with a monopole . for the purpose of phase engineering ,
it is convenient to also write this spinor in spherical coordinates as [ eq : spherical ] _ m ( ) = ( c - e^-i + + e^i + ) , where @xmath8 is the azimuthal angle and @xmath9 the polar angle .
in addition , we define the phase of each component @xmath10 . for example
, the phases of the components in the monopole are given by [ eq : monopolephase ] _
m= ( c -+ + ( -z ) + ) , where @xmath11 is the step function .
the hamiltonian of the condensate in second quantized form is @xcite @xmath12where @xmath13 is the field annihilation operator for spin state @xmath14 , @xmath15 are the spin matrices , @xmath16 is the trapping potential , and @xmath17 and @xmath18 are constants that depend on the scattering lengths @xmath19 and @xmath20 .
@xmath21 and @xmath22 describe respectively the applied magnetic field and the laser beams that will be used to create the monopole . during the times
that the applied magnetic field and lasers are turned on , we assume that their respective hamiltonians dominate @xmath23 and are the only terms that need to be considered in the evolution of the system .
the hamiltonian for the applied magnetic field is given by @xmath24 , where @xmath25 is the gyromagnetic ratio .
when we ignore all other terms in @xmath23 , the magnetic field leads to the following equations of motion : [ eq : b - motion ] = ( _ ij)_j .
when a laser beam is applied , the ground state energy of magnetic substate @xmath14 is shifted by an amount @xcite [ eq : lightshift ] e_i = i_j , where the sum is carried out over all excited states @xmath26 . here , @xmath27 is the detuning of the laser from the @xmath28 transition , @xmath29 the laser intensity , @xmath30 the rate of spontaneous decay , @xmath31 the atomic resonance frequency , and @xmath32 is a transition strength characterizing the coupling between atom and laser .
the coefficients @xmath32 depend on the ground substate @xmath0 and on the polarization of the laser beam and are given in figure [ fig : transitionstrengths ] .
the concept of phase engineering via imprinting was suggested @xcite and experimentally demonstrated @xcite as a means of creating topological defects in scalar condensates .
we extend the method to spinor condensates , focusing on the case of @xmath1 .
we show that the energy shifts induced by different beam polarizations allow for wide capabilities in phase engineering .
suppose that a laser is detuned by an amount @xmath33 from the @xmath34 transition , and that the states @xmath35 and @xmath36 are separated in frequency by an amount @xmath37 , as shown in figure [ fig : frequencydiagram ] . from eq .
( [ eq : lightshift ] ) , the energy of the ground state is shifted by an amount e_i = i_^jp_1/2(f=1)_kp_1/2(f=2)(+ ) .
we assume that the laser pulse has a square envelope with a duration @xmath38 that is short compared to the condensate s correlation time @xmath39 , where @xmath40 is the chemical potential . in this case
the primary effect of the light shift is to imprint a phase onto each component @xcite : [ eq : phaseshift ] _
i()_i()[-ie_it/ ] . using the coefficients given in figure [ fig : transitionstrengths ] and the expansion @xmath41
, one can obtain explicit results for the phase shifts generated in the condensate . for @xmath42 ,
the shifts corresponding to @xmath43- , @xmath44- , and @xmath45-polarized beams are @xmath46\label{eq : pi - phaseshift } , \\ \delta\varphi^{+}(t)^{t } & \approx & -{\alpha}t(3\quad 2\quad 1)\label{eq : plus - phaseshift } , \\ \delta\varphi^{-}(t)^{t } & \approx & -{\alpha}t(1\quad 2\quad 3)\label{eq : minus - phaseshift}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath47 .
equations ( [ eq : pi - phaseshift])-([eq : minus - phaseshift ] ) suggest a basic technique for phase engineering of the spinor condensate . to shift the phase of @xmath48 relative to @xmath49 , one can use beams with polarizations @xmath50 and @xmath51 . once the phase between these two states is fixed as desired , one can use @xmath43-polarized light to adjust the phase of @xmath52 relative to the other states . although it is not used in our proposal for monopole creation , we note that this phase shift is due to a second order term in eq .
( [ eq : pi - phaseshift ] ) , and we thus expect that it will be more difficult to implement in an experiment
. it may be useful , in addition , to alter the global phase of the condensate , which can be realized approximately by using the first order term in eq .
( [ eq : pi - phaseshift ] ) .
finally , one can incorporate spatial dependence into the phases by using the above pulses in conjunction with absorption plates to create non - uniform intensity profiles @xmath53 @xcite .
writing @xmath54 , where @xmath55 is the maximum intensity in the profile and @xmath56 , eqs .
( [ eq : pi - phaseshift])-([eq : minus - phaseshift ] ) remain valid with the replacements @xmath57 and @xmath58 .
martikainen et al . point out @xcite that the monopole spinor given in eq .
( [ eq : monopolespinor ] ) resembles a combination of other topological defects .
indeed , the form of @xmath59 presented in eq .
( [ eq : spherical ] ) makes it clear that the @xmath60 state contains a vortex , the @xmath49 state an anti - vortex , and the @xmath52 state a soliton .
they thus suggest that one can experimentally create monopoles by creating the appropriate defects in the individual components . here
we provide a method to accomplish this using the phase imprinting concepts discussed above .
starting from the ground state of eq .
( [ eq : ground ] ) , we first apply a constant magnetic field of magnitude @xmath61 along the negative @xmath62-axis for a time @xmath63 . defining @xmath64 , eq .
( [ eq : b - motion ] ) readily yields _ b(t_b)= ( c -(_bt_b ) + ( _ bt_b ) + ( _ bt_b ) )
. the phases of @xmath65 ( for @xmath66 ) are _
b^t=(00 ) .
the effect of the magnetic field is to populate the @xmath67 states prior to phase engineering .
experimentally , @xmath68 should be chosen to best realize the monopole structure . to create the monopole
, we assume that we have blue - detuned lasers , all of which have equal intensities @xmath55 and values of @xmath33 , and which can be applied in square - shaped pulses .
the results can be accordingly modified to cover more general situations .
in addition , we assume that we have absorption plates that can create the following intensity profiles : @xmath69 the pulse sequence to create the monopole is given in table [ table : pulsesequence ] .
pulses a and b use intensity profiles with azimuthal dependence to create a vortex in the @xmath48 component and an anti - vortex in the @xmath49 component
. pulses c and d together imprint the necessary phases to generate the soliton in the @xmath52 component .
it can be readily verified that the resulting phases of the components are exactly those of the monopole given in eq .
( [ eq : monopolephase ] ) .
the total time of the laser pulses , assuming that pulses with profiles @xmath70 and @xmath71 can be executed simultaneously , is @xmath72 .
strictly speaking , pulse c is not physically possible the profile @xmath70 requires an axis of propagation @xmath73 in the @xmath74 plane , which is inconsistent with a polarization vector of @xmath75 .
however , it is possible to create an effective interaction term resembling @xmath76 using a beam that does propagate in the @xmath74 plane .
indeed , consider a pulse with polarization vector @xmath77 sandwiched between magnetic field pulses that generate the rotations @xmath78 and @xmath79 .
one can readily check that ( -if_y ) ^ ( if_y)=. physically , the @xmath0 eigenstates along the @xmath80-axis are transformed by rotation to become @xmath0 eigenstates along the @xmath81-axis .
the phase shifts are subsequently performed on these states , where @xmath70 and @xmath82 are consistent , before the system is rotated back . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] experimentally , one should seek to make @xmath33 as large as possible while increasing @xmath55 to maintain a given potential depth .
this is because the photon scattering rate @xmath83 of an individual atom scales as @xmath84 compared to @xmath85 for the dipole potential @xcite , and also because the approximation errors in eqs .
( [ eq : pi - phaseshift])-([eq : minus - phaseshift ] ) scale as @xmath86 . to maintain the validity of eqs .
( [ eq : pi - phaseshift])-([eq : minus - phaseshift ] ) , however , one must impose the limit @xmath87 , where @xmath88 is the fine structure splitting between @xmath89 and @xmath90 .
physically , this means that the light shifts due to the excited @xmath90 states remain negligible compared to those originating from the @xmath89 states . as a concrete example , we consider the case @xmath91 and @xmath92 , where @xmath93 is the saturation intensity .
this results in a pulse sequence length of @xmath94 and a scattering time of an individual atom of @xmath95 .
we also mention that the ratio @xmath96 can be enhanced by pairing every beam in the original sequence with an appropriately chosen second beam .
if both beams have the same polarization and are detuned equally above and below the @xmath97 transition , the light shifts from the @xmath90 states are approximately cancelled out , while those from the @xmath89 states are reinforced .
this makes it possible to abandon the requirement @xmath87 and choose much larger detunings .
finally , we note that the solution ( [ eq : phaseshift ] ) for the dynamics of the system under the laser beams is only approximate and overlooks subtler but important points .
clearly such a transformation is unphysical in our case at the origin as it would introduce an infinite phase gradient energy @xcite , and a more careful analysis of the dynamics near the center would have to include other terms in the hamiltonian .
also , in a real system , an absorption plate can not perfectly generate the intensity profiles given in ( [ eq:+azimuthalintensity ] ) and ( [ eq :- azimuthalintensity ] ) , which leads to various degrees of imperfection in vortex creation @xcite .
in addition , experimental efforts to create a soliton in a scalar condensate using an intensity profile like that of ( [ eq : stepintensity ] ) show that the dipole potential also creates a density wave in addition to the soliton @xcite .
we refer the reader to the cited references for further discussion .
ultimately , however , it does not appear that these imperfections preclude the creation of vortices and solitons , which suggests that the creation of monopoles via phase imprinting should also be viable in spite of such imperfections .
we have proposed a method to create a monopole in an antiferromagnetic spin-1 bec by extending the phase imprinting concept used in scalar bec s .
we demonstrate that laser beams with different polarizations generate energy shifts that can be used to engineer the phases of the magnetic substates in a broad manner .
we also present an explicit pulse sequence that , starting from the ground state of the condensate , produces phases in the substates corresponding to those of a monopole .
|
experimental realization of bose - einstein condensates in 1995 properties effects studied major topics are topological defects vortices solitons realization bec s in optical traps opened avenues research development multicomponent condensates where magnetic substates @xmath0 trapped spin degree freedom permits topological defects skyrmions monopoles properties monopoles stability dynamics examined propose method for creating monopole in bec s on case @xmath1 proposal extends method phase imprinting topological defects condensates energy shift depends on @xmath0 polarization laser beam applying different polarizations phases can be engineered spin-1 bec described by condensate wavefunction @xmath2 @xmath3 total density @xmath4 normalized spinor local spin for anti - ferromagnetic bec @xmath5 ground state spinor given by @xcite [ ground ] _ g()= ( c 0 + 1 + 0 ) spinor to monopole form monopolespinor ] _ m ( ) = ( c -m_x()+im_y ( + m_z ( + m_x()+im_y ) .@xmath6 unit vector field rotation ground state spinor considering energy winding number condensate @xmath7 characterizes monopole structure @xmath6 assumes hedgehog structure monopole phase engineering write spinor spherical coordinates spherical ] _ m ( ) = ( c - e^-i + + e^i + ) @xmath8 azimuthal angle @xmath9 polar angle define phase each component @xmath10 phases components monopole monopolephase ] _ m= ( c -+ + ( -z ) + ) @xmath11 step function hamiltonian condensate @xcite @xmath13 field annihilation operator spin state @xmath14 spin matrices trapping potential @xmath18 constants scattering lengths @xmath19 @xmath20 @xmath21 @xmath22 describe applied magnetic field laser beams monopole lasers turned on hamiltonians dominate @xmath23 only terms evolution system hamiltonian applied magnetic field by @xmath24 @xmath25 gyromagnetic ratio magnetic field leads to equations motion [ eq : b - motion ] = ( _ ij)_j .laser beam applied ground state energy magnetic substate @xmath14 shifted by amount @xcite lightshift e_i = i_j sum carried over states @xmath26 @xmath27 detuning laser from @xmath28 transition laser intensity rate spontaneous decay atomic resonance frequency transition strength atom laser coefficients depend on ground substate @xmath0 polarization laser beam given in figure transitionstrengths phase engineering via imprinting suggested demonstrated topological defects in scalar condensates method to spinor condensates case @xmath1 energy shifts beam polarizations allow capabilities phase engineering laser detuned by @xmath33 from @xmath34 transition states @xmath35 and @xmath36 separated by amount @xmath37 figure energy ground state shifted by e_i = i_^jp_1/2(f=1)_kp_1/2(f=2)(+ ) laser pulse has square envelope duration @xmath38 short compared to condensate s correlation time @xmath39 @xmath40 chemical potential effect light shift phase onto each component @xcite phaseshift ] _ i()coefficients in figure transitionstrengths expansion @xmath41 results for phase shifts in condensate @xmath42 shifts to @xmath43- @xmath45-polarized beams are @xmath46{eq : pi - phaseshift\delta\varphi^{+}(t)^{t\alpha}t(3 2 1) plus - phaseshift-\alpha}t(1 2 3) minus - phaseshift @xmath47 equations eq : pi - phaseshift- minus - phaseshift suggest basic technique for phase engineering spinor condensate to shift phase of @xmath48 relative to @xmath49 use beams with polarizations @xmath50 @xmath51 phase fixed use @xmath43-polarized light to adjust phase of @xmath52 not used proposal monopole creation phase shift due to second order term in eq . pi - phaseshift difficult to implement in experiment alter global phase condensate using first order term in eq . pi - phaseshift ]incorporate spatial dependence into phases using pulses absorption plates create non - uniform intensity profiles @xmath53 @xmath54 @xmath55 maximum intensity @xmath56 pi - phaseshift- minus - phaseshift valid with replacements @xmath57 and @xmath58 martikainen et al . monopole spinor in eq resembles topological defects form of @xmath59 spherical @xmath60 state contains vortex @xmath49 anti - vortex @xmath52 soliton suggest create monopoles by creating appropriate defects in components method using phase imprinting concepts starting from ground state apply constant magnetic field @xmath61 along negative @xmath62-axis @xmath63 @xmath64 b - motion yields _ b(t_b)= ( c -(_bt_b ) + _ bt_b ) + bt_b ) ) phases of @xmath65 @xmath66 are _ b^t=(00 ) magnetic field populate @xmath67 states prior to phase engineering @xmath68 best realize monopole structurecreate monopole assume blue - detuned lasers equal intensities @xmath55 values @xmath33 applied in square - shaped pulses results modified cover general situations assume absorption plates create intensity profiles @xmath69 pulse sequence monopole table pulses a b use intensity profiles azimuthal dependence create vortex @xmath48 anti - vortex @xmath49 pulses c d imprint phases generate soliton @xmath52 component verified resulting phases monopole eq total time laser pulses profiles @xmath70 @xmath71 executed @xmath72 pulse c not possible profile @xmath70 requires axis propagation @xmath73 in @xmath74 plane inconsistent with polarization vector @xmath75 possible create effective interaction term resembling @xmath76 using beam @xmath74 plane consider pulse with polarization vector @xmath77 between magnetic field pulses rotations @xmath78 @xmath79 check -if_y_y @xmath0 eigenstates along @xmath80-axis transformed by rotation become @xmath0 eigenstates @xmath81-axisphase shifts performed on states where @xmath70 and @xmath82 consistent before system rotated cols="^^",options="header " experimentally make @xmath33 large while increasing @xmath55 to maintain potential depth photon scattering rate @xmath83 scales as @xmath84 compared to @xmath85 for approximation errors in eqs scale as @xmath86 maintain validity impose limit @xmath87 @xmath88 structure splitting between @xmath89 and @xmath90 light shifts due to @xmath90 states negligible compared to @xmath89 states case @xmath91 and @xmath92 @xmath93 is saturation intensity results in pulse sequence length of @xmath94 scattering time of atom of @xmath95 ratio @xmath96 enhanced by pairing beam with second beam if both beams same polarization detuned equally above and below @xmath97 transition light shifts from @xmath90 states cancelled @xmath89 states reinforced to abandon requirement @xmath87 choose larger detuningssolution ( [ phaseshift ) for dynamics system under laser beams approximate overlooks points transformation unphysical at origin infinite phase gradient energy @xcite careful analysis near center other terms in hamiltonian real system absorption plate not generate intensity profiles in (+azimuthalintensity and leads to imperfection in vortex creation @xcite experimental efforts to create soliton in scalar condensate using intensity profile like stepintensity show dipole potential creates density wave soliton refer reader to cited references for further discussion imperfections preclude creation of vortices and solitons creation of monopoles via phase imprinting viable proposed method to create monopole in antiferromagnetic spin-1 bec by extending phase imprinting concept in scalar bec s laser beams with polarizations generate energy shifts to engineer phases of magnetic substates present explicit pulse sequence from ground state condensate produces phases in substates corresponding to monopole
| 0.501671
| 3,340
| 1,723
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,459
|
the exchange coupling between fe layers separated by bcc cu is calculated for fe / cu / fe ( 001 ) trilayers .
it is shown that the coupling is basically regulated by three extrema of the bulk bcc cu fermi surface .
the contributions from those extrema are all of the same order of magnitude , but that associated with the `` belly '' at the @xmath0-point dominates .
the calculated temperature dependence of the coupling varies considerably with spacer layer thickness .
individually , the amplitudes of these extrema contribution decrease with temperature , each according to a different rate .
such an effect may cause an actual increase of coupling with temperature for some cu thicknesses .
although the common crystal phase of bulk cu is fcc , it is possible to grow thin films of bcc cu on fe ( 001 ) .
the bcc stacking proceeds for up to 12 or 20 atomic planes approximately , but for larger thicknesses significant lattice modifications occur , leading to a structural transformation.@xcite the exchange coupling between fe layers separated by bcc cu has been measured by groups at simon fraser university ( sfu ) and philips.@xcite both have found that the coupling oscillates with decreasing amplitude as a function of the cu thickness , but their results disagree in several important aspects.@xcite the philips group data show well - defined short - period oscillations@xcite whereas the sfu group originally observed a long - period oscillatory coupling.@xcite later , the sfu group found some indication of a short - wavelength oscillation in samples with smoother interfaces.@xcite the exchange coupling in multilayers can be strongly affected by sample interface quality.@xcite it is widely accepted that interface roughness tends to suppress short - wavelength oscillations and reduce the coupling amplitude .
therefore , as pointed out in ref . , it is rather puzzling that the values obtained at philips are substantially smaller than those of the sfu group .
motivated by these apparently conflicting experimental results , we have undertaken a theoretical analysis of the exchange coupling between fe layers across bcc cu in fe / cu / fe ( 001 ) trilayers .
the coupling @xmath1 is calculated for several temperatures @xmath2 and spacer layer thicknesses @xmath3 , using an extension of the formulation developed in ref .. for suficiently large @xmath3 , we divide @xmath4 into oscillatory components coming from extrema which are related to the spacer fermi surface ( fs ) .
these oscillatory contributions to the coupling are calculated separately .
our results show that for perfectly smooth interfaces @xmath4 is dominated by short - period oscillations .
we find that the temperature dependence of the coupling changes significantly with spacer layer thickness .
the amplitude of each oscillatory component decreases with temperature , but they do so at different rates .
we show that this may cause a surprising effect which is the increase of the coupling with temperature for some cu thicknesses . the interlayer exchange coupling , defined as the total energy difference per surface atom between the antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic configurations of the trilayer , is given by @xcite : @xmath5 where @xmath6,\ ] ] @xmath7 and @xmath8 . in the equations above @xmath9
are the wave vectors parallel to the layers , @xmath10 is the usual fermi - dirac distribution function , and @xmath11 is a plane index . as in ref .
we consider an imaginary cleavage plane across the spacer between planes @xmath11 and @xmath12 , separating the trilayer into two semi - infinite systems . @xmath13 and @xmath14 are matrices in orbital indices representing the surface one - electron green functions of the left and right cleaved systems , respectively .
the trace is taken over orbital indices and @xmath15 denotes the spacer hopping matrix .
this formula for the coupling is an extension of the result previously obtained in ref .
and , for the one band model , reduces to the torque formula of edwards et al .
@xcite in deriving it we have assumed that the electrons are noninteracting in the spacer and experience exchange - split one - electron potentials in the ferromagnetic layers .
most of the experimental results are for the bilinear exchange coupling term @xmath16 which , for perfectly smooth fe / cu ( 001 ) interfaces , is virtually equal to @xmath17.@xcite we have calculated the required green functions within the tight - binding model with @xmath18 orbitals and hopping to second nearest neighbours .
the tight - binding parameters for all bcc cu planes were determined from a first - principles lmto - tight - binding electronic structure calculation of paramagnetic bulk bcc cu .
the parameters for ferromagnetic fe were obtained from paramagnetic bulk fe@xcite , by self - consistently adjusting the on - site energies , assuming charge neutrality .
the effective intra - atomic electron - electron interactions were taken to be @xmath19 and @xmath20 .
@xcite we neglect atomic potential differences due to the magnetic configuration change , thus making the approximation known as the `` force theorem '' . the @xmath9 sum in eq.(1 )
is performed numerically and the energy integral is evaluated in the complex plane by summing over matsubara frequencies at finite @xmath2 . the calculated results at @xmath2=300k for the bilinear exchange coupling @xmath21 as a function of cu thickness are presented in fig.[fig1 ] ( full circles ) .
our results clearly show a short - period oscillatory exchange coupling , in excellent agreement with the philips group data as far as the period of oscillation is concerned . for sufficiently large spacer thickness it is possible to express the coupling as a sum of oscillatory components whose periods are determined by extrema that are related to the spacer fs .
@xcite it is essential to use a non - perturbative treatment , as in the quantum well approach , to analyze the relative importance of these contributions .
@xcite they depend upon the degree of confinement experienced by the carriers of both spin orientations in the corresponding extremum states , in the ferromagnetic and anti - ferromagnetic configurations of the magnetic layers.@xcite the widespread practice of considering only the periods predicted by rkky theory , and treating the amplitudes and phases of these contributions as adjustable parameters may be inadequate and rather misleading .
the fitting usually involves several parameters and , in some cases , is not unique . besides , when the spacer fs has to be regarded as consisting of more than one sheet , periods not predicted by rkky theory may exist.@xcite moreover , at finite temperatures , the decrease of the oscillation amplitudes as @xmath3 increases is different for each extremum and may deviate strongly from the @xmath22 asymptotic regime@xcite usually assumed in that sort of fitting .
to identify the periods of oscillations of @xmath4 it is useful to look at the spacer fs . in bcc
cu only one energy band @xmath23 crosses the fermi energy @xmath24 .
its calculated fs , shown in fig.[fig2](a ) , is basically a sphere with twelve `` necks '' developing at each face centre of the bulk bcc first brillouin zone . in the ( 001 ) direction of growth ,
three sets of @xmath25 associated with the fs extrema contribute to the coupling .
the first set consists of a single wave vector @xmath26 ( @xmath0-point ) related to the fs `` belly '' .
the other two are associated with the `` necks '' . set 2 consists of four vectors @xmath25 : @xmath27 and @xmath28 , and set 3 of the @xmath29-points located at @xmath30 . here
all wave vectors are given in units of @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the lattice constant .
due to the layered stucture of the system , it is useful to work with the layer adapted bulk brillouin zone instead of the usual bz .
the former is defined as a prism whose base is the two - dimensional first bz and whose height is @xmath33 , where @xmath34 is the interplane distance perpendicular to the layers .
the relevant cross sections of the spacer fs , together with the corresponding extremal wave vectors @xmath35 , are shown in fig.[fig2](b ) .
we must distinguish sets 1 and 2 from set 3 because , for the latter , the fs can be regarded as consisting of more than one sheet .
this is because more than one extrema occurs in the first prismatic bulk bz for each wave vector @xmath25 of set 3 .
considering that the integrand @xmath36 in eq.[j ] is an oscillatory function of @xmath3 we can expand it in a fourier series .
however , it is necessary to generalize the expansion to a multiple fourier series @xcite , when the equation @xmath37 has more than one pair of solutions @xmath38 . in this case
, the general expansion of @xmath36 is @xmath39 for @xmath40 the exponential in eq.[j2 ] oscillates rapidly as a function of @xmath41 and @xmath42 .
thus , the stationary phase method can be applied , and the dominant contribution to the coupling comes from @xmath43 and @xmath41 in the neighborhood of points at which the argument of the exponential is stationary . in this limit
both the sum in @xmath41 and the energy integral in eq.[j ] can be evaluated analytically .
the stationary points @xmath25 are the solutions of @xmath44 where @xmath45 is the two - dimensional gradient in @xmath46 space . for @xmath25 belonging to sets 1 and 2
only one fs sheet occurs in the first prismatic bulk bz ; the analysis then proceeds exactly as in ref . .
the corresponding periods are : @xmath47=2.69 atomic planes and @xmath48=2.36 atomic planes respectively . however , for the @xmath29-points the fs can be regarded as consisting of two sheets .
the two values of @xmath49 ( @xmath50 and @xmath51 associated with @xmath52 , shown by arrows in fig .
[ fig2](b ) , correspond to equivalent periods @xmath53 atomic planes and @xmath54 atomic planes which can not be distinguished just by looking at discrete values of @xmath3 .
however , @xmath55 and @xmath56 vanish simultaneously when calculated at @xmath57 .
thus , eq . [ j3 ] is satisfied for any values of @xmath58 and @xmath59 , yielding other periods besides @xmath60 and @xmath61 .
the relative contributions of these extrema depend on the comparative values of the corresponding coefficients @xmath62 .
the situation is very similar to that discussed in ref . .
nevertheless , our calculations have shown that the fundamental period @xmath60 ( which is equivalent to @xmath61 ) and its harmonics dominate .
this is because the coefficients associated with them are far larger than those corresponding to alternative combinations of @xmath58 and @xmath63 .
the calculated contributions to the coupling at t=300k coming separately from each set of @xmath25 are shown in fig .
[ fig1 ] .
we note that all three contributions are comparable , but the belly ( full continuous line ) clearly dominates .
this contrasts with fcc co / cu ( 001 ) trilayers where the belly contribution is negligible in comparison with those given by the necks.@xcite the main reason for such difference is that minority carriers from the vicinity of the fs belly are fully confined in bcc cu by the fe layers in the ferromagnetic configuration .
the physical origin of such confinement is that the sp - like bcc cu band which intersects the fs has no counterpart at the minority - spin fe fs .
a similar situation happens for the cu fs states in the vicinity of @xmath64 belonging to set 2 , as shown in fig.[fig3 ] . on the other hand ,
the cu fs @xmath29-states of either spin can evolve into the corresponding fe fs states because they have sp - character , due to the existence of a small but finite sp - d hybridization in this @xmath65-space region .
the degree of confinement experienced by the carriers in this case depends on the relative sp - d hybridization strengths .
the agreement between the stationary phase approximation and numerical results verifies that the exchange coupling at room temperature in fe / cu ( 001 ) trilayers with perfect interfaces oscillates with a short period strongly influenced by the belly contribution .
this is in accordance with the philips group observations , as far as the period is concerned .
however , the calculated strength is an order of magnitude larger than what they have observed .
on the other hand the amplitude of our long period component is about three times smaller than the short period contribution .
we believe that the discrepancy between experimental and theoretical results is due to interface roughness which affects the amplitude and overall phase of the coupling .
@xcite the reason why the philips results are much smaller than those of the sfu group remains unexplained .
motivated by recent measurements of the sfu group,@xcite we have calculated the temperature variation of the coupling for different cu thicknesses .
our results , shown in fig.[fig4 ] , are for perfect interfaces where the bilinear exchange coupling @xmath21 is much larger than the intrinsic biquadratic term .
the rate of variation of @xmath66 with temperature clearly changes with spacer thickness .
the calculated slope for fe/12cu / fe agrees very well with the measured value for fe/10cu / fe .
the most striking result however , reproduced in the inset of fig.[fig4 ] , is the increase of the coupling with increasing temperature for some cu thicknesses .
the temperature dependence of @xmath21 is governed not only by the spacer fs but also by the confining strength of the ferromagnetic layers @xcite , which differs for the three sets of extrema . as pointed out in ref . , the energy dependence of the phases @xmath67 of the `` fourier '' coefficients in eq .
[ j2 ] varies according to the confinement strength and is very important in determining the temperature dependence of the coupling .
it turns out that the values of @xmath68 calculated at the second set of extrema are about four and a half times larger than at the belly and the @xmath29-points .
the temperature dependence of the former contribution is then stronger than the others .
hence , the coupling is approximately given by the sum of three oscillatory functions of @xmath3 with comparable amplitudes which decay differently with temperature .
therefore , at some values of @xmath3 , as in fe/13cu / fe , the balance is such that an overall increase in the coupling is obtained even though the amplitude of each contribution separately decreases with temperature .
such increase was not detected by the sfu group .
one possible explanation is that they have observed basically just a long period component .
another reason could be the influence of spin fluctuations in the ferromagnetic layers , which is neglected in our calculations .
nevertheless , this is an interesting temperature effect which may be observed under suitable conditions .
|
we thank s.f . pessoa for kindly providing us with the tight - binding parameters of bcc cu , d.m .
edwards for helpful discussions and t.j.p .
penna for helping with the figures .
this work has been financially supported by cnpq and finep of brazil , and serc of u.k .
|
thank s.f . pessoa parameters bcc cu d.m . edwards discussions t.j.p . penna helping figures work financially supported cnpq finep brazil serc u.k
| 0.065979
| 68
| 36
|
, Saving $0.0 in GPT-4.
|
202,463
|
in this paper , we prove the k- and l - theoretical isomorphism conjecture for baumslag - solitar groups with coefficients in an additive category .
|
in this paper , we confirm that the isomorphism conjecture is true for all baumslag - solitar groups .
our main theorem is as follows the k- and l - theoretical isomorphism conjecture is true for every baumslag - solitar group with coefficients in any additive category .
independently , g. gandini , s. meinert and h. rping proved the isomorphism conjecture with coefficients in an additive category for the fundamental group of any graph of abelian groups in @xcite , which includes all baumslag - solitar groups .
recall that the baumslag - solitar group @xmath0 is defined by @xmath1 and all the solvable ones are isomorphic to @xmath2 .
note that @xmath3 .
when @xmath4 , @xmath5 are cat(0 ) groups , hence one can use @xcite and @xcite to conclude @xmath5 satisfies the isomorphism conjecture with coefficients in an additive category . since the construction of a @xmath6 space with universal cover a cat(0 ) space is enlightening for part of our proof , we construct it here .
we start with two cylinders @xmath7 $ ] , @xmath8 $ ] with @xmath9 is the standard circle with radius @xmath10 , @xmath11 has radius @xmath12 .
we will glue @xmath13 to @xmath14 by a @xmath10-fold ( orientation preserving ) local isometry covering map . and
we do the same to @xmath15 and @xmath16 .
what we get is a @xmath17 space with universal cover cat(0 ) .
if we reverse orientation on the second gluing , we will get a @xmath18 space with universal cover cat(0 ) . in this paper
, we will actually prove the isomorphism conjecture for @xmath0 with finite wreath products and coefficients in an additive category .
the k- and l - theoretical isomorphism conjecture with finite wreath products and coefficients in an additive category is known for all solvable baumslag - solitar groups , see @xcite and @xcite .
hence we only need to prove the case when @xmath19 .
we will abbreviate the k- and l - theoretical isomorphism conjecture with finite wreath products and coefficients in an additive category by fjcw .
the idea is to analyze the preimages of cyclic subgroups corresponding to a certain linear representation of @xmath0 by using bass - serre theory , and conclude they satisfy fjcw .
our results relies on previous work on fjcw for cat(0 ) groups and virtually solvable groups by bartels and lck in @xcite , and wegner in @xcite , @xcite .
note that fjcw implies the isomorphism conjecture with coefficients in an additive category .
we list some inheritance properties and results on fjcw that we will need . for more information about fjcw
we refer to @xcite section 2.3 .
[ qut ] ( 1 ) if a group @xmath20 satisfies fjcw , then every subgroup @xmath21 satisfies fjcw .
+ ( 2 ) if @xmath22 and @xmath23 satisfy fjcw , then their direct product @xmath24 and free product @xmath25 satisfy fjcw .
+ ( 3 ) let @xmath26 be a directed system of groups ( with not necessarily injective structure maps ) .
if each @xmath27 satisfies fjcw , then the direct limit @xmath28 satisfies fjcw .
+ ( 4 ) let @xmath29 be a group homomorphism .
if @xmath30 and @xmath31 satisfy fjcw for every cyclic subgroup @xmath32 then g satisfies fjcw .
+ ( 5 ) cat(0 ) groups satisfy fjcw .
+ ( 6 ) virtually solvable groups satisfy fjcw .
in particular @xmath33 } } \rtimes_{\frac{m}{n } } \mathbb{z}$ ] satisfies fjcw , where @xmath34 .
+ proof of ( 1 ) - ( 4 ) can be found for example in @xcite section 2.3 .
( 5 ) is the main result of @xcite and @xcite .
( 6 ) is proved in @xcite .
in this section , we prove our main theorem . recall @xmath35 .
we assume @xmath36 .
let @xmath37 } } \rtimes_{\frac{m}{n } } \mathbb{z}$ ] .
@xmath38 is a solvable linear group .
there is a map @xmath39 mapping @xmath40 to @xmath41 and @xmath42 to @xmath43 . note that fjcw is known for @xmath38 by proposition [ qut ] ( 6 ) .
hence by proposition [ qut ] ( 4 ) in order to prove fjcw for @xmath0 , we only need to prove fjcw holds for any subgroup @xmath31 of @xmath38 where @xmath44 is a cyclic subgroup of @xmath38 .
viewing @xmath0 as an hnn extension , we have an associated oriented tree @xmath45 and @xmath0 acts on it without inversion , see for example @xcite , i.3.4 .
let @xmath46 be the cyclic subgroup in @xmath0 generated by @xmath40 , @xmath47 be the subgroup generated by @xmath48 .
then the vertices of @xmath45 are left cosets @xmath49 , and edges are the left cosets @xmath50 where @xmath51 .
the edge @xmath50 connects from the tail vertex @xmath49 to the head vertex @xmath52 .
the stabilizer of the vertex @xmath49 is the subgroup @xmath53 , and the stabilizer of the edge @xmath50 is @xmath54 . at each vertex , there are @xmath10 edges going out and @xmath55 edges going in
. see figure [ tree2 - 3 ] for a picture of @xmath56 .
we will show @xmath31 is a free group by showing it acts freely on the tree @xmath45 ( see for example @xcite , i.4.1 ) . for every vertex @xmath49 in @xmath45 , its stabilizer under the action of @xmath0
is the cyclic subgroup @xmath53 .
let @xmath59 , then for any @xmath60 , @xmath61 note that @xmath44 is generated by @xmath57 with @xmath58 and the second coordinate of @xmath62 is @xmath63 .
hence @xmath64 .
note that @xmath65 restricted to @xmath46 is injective , hence it is injective when restricted to @xmath53 .
therefore @xmath66 .
we conclude that for every vertex @xmath49 , the stabilizer for the action of @xmath31 on @xmath45 is trivial . therefore @xmath31 acts freely on @xmath45 .
now by proposition [ qut ] ( 5 ) , @xmath31 satisfies the fjcw .
we now start the proof of proposition [ case2 ] . by equation ( 1 ) in the proof of proposition [ case1 ] , one sees that @xmath70 for any @xmath71 .
hence @xmath72 , and @xmath73 .
hence vertex or edge stabilizers for the action of @xmath68 on @xmath45 are the same as for the @xmath0 action .
in particular , all the vertex and edge stabilizers are isomorphic to @xmath74 .
moreover , for every edge @xmath50 , the stabilizer @xmath75 embeds into the tail vertex stabilizer @xmath76 by multiplying @xmath10 .
correspondingly , @xmath75 embeds into the head vertex stabilizer @xmath77 by multiplying @xmath55 . note
if we add one relation @xmath78 to the group @xmath0 then the new group is isomorphic to @xmath74 .
hence there is a surjective homomorphism @xmath79 . if we denote the projection from @xmath33 } } \rtimes_{\frac{m}{n } } \mathbb{z}$ ] to @xmath74 by @xmath80 , then @xmath81 . and if @xmath82 , then @xmath83 .
the action of @xmath84 on @xmath45 has the following key property .
[ loo ] for any @xmath82 , the oriented geodesic connecting @xmath49 and @xmath85 contains an even number of edges , half of them are compatible with the orientation on @xmath45 , while the other half are oppositely oriented .
we first define an algebraic distance " function @xmath86 .
note the tree @xmath45 has a standard metric with edge length @xmath12 .
for any two points @xmath87 , there is a unique oriented geodesic connecting @xmath88 to @xmath30 .
@xmath89 is the distance from @xmath88 to @xmath30 counted with signs . in more detail ,
when the geodesic coincide with tree orientation , it contributes positively ; otherwise negatively .
for example , in figure [ tree2 - 3 ] , @xmath90 , @xmath91 .
note @xmath92 , @xmath93 for any @xmath94 .
since @xmath0 acts on @xmath45 via orientation preserving isometries , @xmath95 , for any @xmath51 .
in particular , @xmath96 since @xmath40 is in the stabilizer of the vertex @xmath46 . and
@xmath97 , hence @xmath98 .
note for any @xmath82 , @xmath83 . without loss of generality , we can write @xmath84 as a word @xmath99 , @xmath100 . then @xmath101 . therefore , @xmath102
@xmath103 + @xmath104 + @xmath105 + @xmath106 + @xmath107 + in general , @xmath108 since @xmath109 .
the lemma now follows . to see
this just observe that @xmath110 can be reduced to the oriented geodesic connecting @xmath49 and @xmath85 in a finite number of simple moves of the form @xmath111 where @xmath112 is an oriented edge and @xmath113 is the same edge with the opposite orientation . ( and @xmath114 , ets .
means concatenation of paths . )
+ summarize what we have so far , the quotient @xmath115 is an oriented graph of groups with the following properties : every vertex or edge stabilizer is isomorphic to @xmath74 , the edge stabilizer embeds into its tail vertex stabilizer by multiplying @xmath10 , and to its head vertex stabilizer by multiplying @xmath55 ; moreover , every oriented loop @xmath110 in @xmath115 has an even number of edges , where exactly half of them coincide with the orientation .
this is a consequence of addendum [ add ] and the observation that @xmath110 lifts to an oriented path @xmath116 in @xmath45 with initial point and end point identified by the action of some element in @xmath68 . choosing a base vertex @xmath120 in @xmath117 , since its stabilizer is @xmath74 , we construct a cylinder @xmath121 $ ] with radius @xmath12 . for every edge and every other vertex , we will construct a cylinder @xmath121 $ ] with radius determined inductively by the following criteria : + _ _ + we now explicitly define these radius so that the above criteria are satisfied .
we start by defining the radius @xmath122 of the cylinder corresponding to a vertex @xmath123 of @xmath117 as follows .
let @xmath110 be an oriented path connecting @xmath120 to @xmath123 .
define the integer @xmath124 to be the number of positive ( agreeing ) edges in @xmath110 minus the number of negative ( disagreeing ) edges . to see that @xmath124 is well defined , let @xmath125 be a second such path .
then the concatenation @xmath126 is an oriented loop in @xmath115 which ( as observed above ) must have the same number of @xmath127 edges as @xmath128 edges .
now let @xmath129 and then the radius @xmath130 of an edge @xmath112 is defined by @xmath131 where @xmath123 is the head vertex of @xmath112 .
now we glue all these cylinders together by local isometries according to the graph @xmath117 .
we glue them together using the following method .
+ therefore we have constructed a 2-complex which is a model for @xmath132 .
it is now easy to check that its universal cover is a cat(0 ) space ; cf .
@xcite , p502 , theorem i.2.7 .
this completes the proof of proposition [ case2 ] .
|
paper confirm isomorphism conjecture baumslag - solitar groups k- l - theoretical isomorphism conjecture true every baumslag solitar group coefficients additive category g. gandini s meinert h. rping proved isomorphism conjecture coefficients additive category fundamental group abelian groups @xcite baumslag - solitar groups baumslag - solitar group @xmath0 defined by @xmath1 ones isomorphic to @xmath2 @xmath3 @xmath4 @xmath5 cat(0 ) groups @xmath5 satisfies isomorphism conjecture coefficients additive category construction @xmath6 space universal cover cat(0 ) space start two cylinders @xmath7 @xmath9 standard circle radius @xmath10 radius @xmath12 glue @xmath13 to @xmath14-fold isometry map @xmath15 @xmath16 @xmath17 space universal cover cat(0 ) reverse orientation gluing @xmath18 space universal cover cat(0 ) prove isomorphism conjecture @xmath0 finite wreath products coefficients additive categoryk- l - theoretical isomorphism conjecture finite wreath products coefficients additive category known for solvable baumslag - groups @xcite prove case @xmath19 abbreviate isomorphism conjecture by fjcw analyze preimages cyclic subgroups representation @xmath0 bass - serre theory conclude satisfy fjcw results work fjcw cat(0 ) groups solvable groups bartels lck wegner fjcw implies isomorphism conjecture coefficients additive category inheritance properties results on fjcw more information fjcw @xcite section 2.3 group @xmath20 satisfies fjcw subgroup @xmath21 satisfies fjcw @xmath22 @xmath23 satisfy fjcw product @xmath24 @xmath25 satisfy fjcw @xmath26 directed system of groups structure @xmath27 satisfies fjcw direct limit @xmath28 satisfies fjcw @xmath29 group homomorphism @xmath30 @xmath31 satisfy fjcw cyclic subgroup @xmath32 g satisfies fjcw cat(0 ) groups satisfy fjcw6 ) solvable groups satisfy fjcw @xmath33 satisfies fjcw @xmath34 proof 1 - 4 ) @xcite section 2.3 5 ) main result @xcite 6 ) proved in @xcite prove main theorem recall @xmath35 assume @xmath36 @xmath37 @xmath38 solvable linear group map @xmath39 @xmath40 to @xmath41 @xmath42 to @xmath43 fjcw known for @xmath38 by proposition qut ( 6 ) prove fjcw @xmath0 fjcw holds subgroup @xmath31 @xmath38 @xmath44 cyclic subgroup @xmath38 @xmath0 hnn extension associated oriented tree @xmath45 @xmath0 acts without inversion @xcite.3.4 @xmath46 subgroup @xmath0 @xmath40 @xmath47 subgroup @xmath48 vertices @xmath45 left cosets @xmath49 edges left cosets @xmath50 edge @xmath50 connects tail vertex @xmath49 to head vertex @xmath52stabilizer vertex @xmath49 subgroup @xmath53 edge @xmath50 @xmath54 each vertex @xmath10 out @xmath55 edges in figure tree2 - 3 picture @xmath56 @xmath31 free group acts freely on tree @xmath45 vertex @xmath49 @xmath45 stabilizer @xmath0 cyclic subgroup @xmath53 @xmath59 @xmath60 @xmath44 generated by @xmath57 with @xmath58 second coordinate @xmath62 is @xmath63 @xmath64 @xmath65 restricted to @xmath46 injective restricted @xmath53 @xmath66 vertex @xmath49 stabilizer action @xmath31 on @xmath45 trivial @xmath31 acts freely on @xmath45 proposition [ ( 5 @xmath31 satisfies fjcw proof of proposition case2 ] equation ( 1 ) @xmath70 @xmath71 @xmath72 @xmath73 vertex edge stabilizers action @xmath68 on @xmath45 same @xmath0 action vertex edge stabilizers isomorphic to @xmath74edge @xmath50 stabilizer @xmath75 embeds tail @xmath76 @xmath10 @xmath75 embeds head vertex stabilizer @xmath77 @xmath55 relation @xmath78 group @xmath0 new group isomorphic to @xmath74 surjective homomorphism @xmath79 projection from @xmath33 to @xmath74 @xmath80 @xmath81 @xmath82 @xmath83 action @xmath84 on @xmath45 oriented geodesic connecting @xmath49 @xmath85 even edges half compatible orientation @xmath45 half oppositely oriented define algebraic distance function @xmath86 tree @xmath45 standard metric edge length @xmath12 two points @xmath87 unique oriented geodesic connecting @xmath88 to @xmath30 @xmath89 distance @xmath88 to @xmath30 counted signs geodesic tree orientation contributes positively otherwise negatively @xmath90 @xmath91 @xmath92 @xmath93 @xmath94 @xmath0 acts on @xmath45 orientation isometries @xmath95 @xmath51@xmath96 @xmath40 stabilizer vertex @xmath46 @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath82 @xmath83 write @xmath84 @xmath99 @xmath100 @xmath101 @xmath102 @xmath103 + @xmath104 @xmath105 @xmath106 + @xmath107 @xmath108 since @xmath109 lemma follows @xmath110 reduced oriented geodesic connecting @xmath49 @xmath85 finite moves form @xmath111 @xmath112 oriented edge @xmath113 same edge opposite orientation @xmath114 means concatenation paths quotient @xmath115 oriented graph groups vertex edge stabilizer isomorphic to @xmath74 stabilizer embeds tail vertex stabilizer multiplying @xmath10 head vertex @xmath55 oriented loop @xmath110 @xmath115 even number edges half coincide consequence addendum @xmath110 lifts oriented path @xmath116 in @xmath45 initial point end point action element @xmath68 base vertex @xmath120 in @xmath117 stabilizer @xmath74 construct cylinder @xmath121 radius @xmath12 .every edge vertex construct cylinder @xmath121 radius determined by criteria define radius criteria defining radius @xmath122 cylinder corresponding vertex @xmath123 of @xmath117 @xmath110 oriented path connecting @xmath120 to @xmath123 define integer @xmath124 number positive agreeing edges in @xmath110 minus negative edges @xmath124 @xmath125 second path concatenation @xmath126 oriented loop in @xmath115 same number @xmath127 edges as @xmath128 edges @xmath129 radius @xmath130 of edge @xmath112 defined by @xmath131 @xmath123 head vertex of @xmath112 glue cylinders together by local isometries graph @xmath117 method constructed 2-complex model for @xmath132 check universal cover is cat(0 ) space @xcite p502 theorem i.2.7 completes proof of proposition case2 ]
| 0.427413
| 2,881
| 1,591
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,484
|
we study the temperature structure of the intergalactic medium ( igm ) using a large cosmological @xmath0-body / sph simulation .
we employ a two - temperature model for the thermal evolution of the ionized gas , in which we include explicitly the relaxation process between electrons and ions . in the diffuse , hot igm ,
the relaxation time is comparable to the age of the universe and hence the electron temperature in post - shock regions remains significantly smaller than the ion temperature .
we show that , at the present epoch , a large fraction of the warm / hot intergalactic medium ( whim ) has a well - developed two - temperature structure , with typical temperature differences of order a few .
consequently , the fraction of metals in various ionization states such as ovi , ovii , and oviii , as well as their line emissivities , can differ locally by more than an order of magnitude from those computed with a single - temperature model , especially in gas with @xmath1 k. it is thus necessary to follow the evolution of the electron temperature explicitly to determine absorption and emission by the whim .
although equipartition is nearly achieved in the denser intracluster medium ( icm ) , we find an appreciable systematic deviation between the gas - mass weighted electron temperature and the mean temperature even at half the virial radii of clusters .
there is thus a reservoir of warm ( @xmath2 kev ) gas in and around massive clusters .
our results imply that relaxation processes need to be considered in describing and interpreting observational data from existing x - ray telescopes as well as from future missions designed to detect the whim , such as the _ diffuse intergalactic oxygen surveyor _ and the _ missing baryon explorer_.
|
the distribution of baryons in the universe remains one of the puzzling issues in modern cosmology . at the present epoch , the total amount of baryons inferred from a census of hi absorption , gas and stars in galaxies , and x - ray emission from hot gas in galaxy clusters is far smaller than that predicted by nucleosynthesis calculations ( persic & salucci 1992 ; fukugita , hogan & peebles 1998 ) and by measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation ( spergel et al .
hence , it is believed that a large fraction of the baryons lies in an as yet undiscovered _ dark _ state .
three dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of cosmic structure formation ( e.g. , cen & ostriker 1999 ; dav et al .
2001 ; croft et al .
2002 ) predict that about 3040% of the baryons reside in the so - called warm - hot intergalactic medium ( whim ) at the present epoch .
this gas is mostly shock - heated to a temperature of @xmath3@xmath4 k during large scale structure formation , and this relatively low temperature makes its thermal emission difficult to detect with conventional x - ray probes .
a variety of observational approaches have been considered for studying the whim , including both ultraviolet ( e.g. , furlanetto et al .
2003 , 2004 ) and x - ray lines .
with respect to the latter possibility , there have been several tentative claims that the whim has been detected locally in absorption ( e.g. , nicastro et al .
2002 ) and in emission ( finoguenov et al . 2003 ) . moreover , yoshikawa et al .
( 2004 ) have proposed using ovii / oviii lines to examine the whim in detail with high spectral resolution x - ray detectors .
they argue that , under a variety of assumptions , about half of the whim ( by mass ) can be detected via oxygen line emission ( see also fang et al .
while the proposed missions appear promising , the detectability depends crucially on the assumed metallicity and the relative abundances of particular ions .
previous theoretical studies used a single - temperature model for the whim , under the assumption that equipartition is fully achieved
. however , the outskirts of galaxy clusters may actually have a two - temperature structure ( e.g. , fox & loeb 1997 ; takizawa 1998 ; courty & alimi 2004 ) .
near galaxy clusters , infalling gas shock - heats to roughly the virial temperature as kinetic energy is converted into thermal energy . because the infalling ions carry nearly all of the bulk kinetic energy ( exceeding that contained in electrons by a factor @xmath5 ) , the post - shock electrons can gain thermal energy only via collisions with ions . if collisional relaxation takes a time comparable to or longer than the age of the universe , the two temperatures , i.e. those of the electrons and ions , remain different .
one can easily show that the relaxation time is rather long for diffuse warm - hot gas around clusters and in large - scale filamentary structures .
since the relative abundance of metal ions and their emissivities are sensitive to the electron temperature , this has important implications for future observations of the whim , particularly for the hotter component . in this _
letter _ , we study the thermal evolution of the intergalactic medium ( igm ) using a large hydrodynamic simulation of structure formation .
we show that a considerable fraction of the whim indeed has a two - temperature structure , particularly in and around rich clusters . in these regions ,
the electron temperature is typically smaller than the ion temperature by a factor of a few , substantially modifying estimates of the abundances of ions and their emissivities .
for our simulations , we use the parallel tree - pm / sph code gadget2 ( v. springel , in preparation ) , which employs a fully conservative scheme for integrating the equations of motion ( springel & hernquist 2002 ) .
we implement non - equipartition processes between ions and electrons following fox & loeb ( 1997 ) and takizawa ( 1998 ) .
equilibrium in an electron - proton plasma is achieved in the following manner . after passing through a shock ,
electrons and ions thermalize into ( separate ) maxwellian distributions on equilibration timescales @xmath6 , with @xmath7 ( spitzer 1962 ) . here ,
@xmath8 and @xmath9 are the electron and ion masses and we have assumed protons dominate the ionic component .
equipartition between protons and electrons is achieved on an even longer timescale @xmath10 .
hence , we assume that electrons and ions quickly achieve maxwellian distributions with temperatures @xmath11 and @xmath12 , respectively , and consider only the non - equipartition effect .
spitzer ( 1962 ) showed that the appropriate timescale is given by @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the electric charge , @xmath15 is the charge of an ion , @xmath16 is the ion number density , and @xmath17 is the coulomb logarithm , which is given by @xmath18 for a hot , fully ionized plasma , @xmath19 and this timescale can be comparable to the hubble time in regions with @xmath20 k and overdensities @xmath21 with respect to the cosmic mean .
the evolution of the electron temperature is given by @xmath22 we do not consider heat conduction on the assumption that it will be suppressed by tangled magnetic fields .
some other electron heating processes driven by plasma instabilities have also been proposed ( laming 2000 ) , but detailed calculations in the context of supernova remnants suggest that these mechanisms convert less than @xmath23% of the bulk kinetic energy to electron thermal energy ( e.g. , cargill & papadopoulos 1988 ) , so we neglect these effects .
our treatment therefore maximizes the possible offset between @xmath11 and @xmath12 .
we work with a flat @xmath24-dominated cold dark matter cosmology with matter density @xmath25 , cosmological constant @xmath26 and expansion rate at the present time @xmath27 km s@xmath28 mpc@xmath28 .
we set the baryon density @xmath29 and the normalization parameter @xmath30 .
our simulation employs @xmath31 cold dark matter particles and the same number of non - radiative gas particles in a cosmological volume 100 @xmath32 mpc on a side .
the mass per gas particle is @xmath33 , and the nominal gas mass resolution is about @xmath34 for our choice of the number of sph neighbors , @xmath35 .
we note that the cdm initial conditions and the large simulation volume allow us to correctly model the merging process during the formation of filamentary structures and the assembly of massive halos which contribute to heating of the igm as well as the intracluster medium ( icm ; e.g. , keshet et al .
figure 1 shows the baryon distribution at @xmath36 in a slice 20 @xmath32 mpc thick ( top ) , the hot component with temperature @xmath37 k ( middle ) , and gas in which @xmath38 . the latter two components are quite similar , suggesting that much of the hotter whim has a two - temperature structure .
the distribution of the two - temperature gas appears quite complex even in clusters , indicating that shocks induced by mergers during hierarchical assembly propagate and leave two - temperature gas within clusters .
we have checked the time variation of the specific entropy of the gas elements and verified that the two - temperature regions have recently been shock - heated . in the gas around large - scale structure , _ continuous
_ shock - heating disturbs equipartition sufficiently close to the shock , while more distant gas is often relaxed .
figure 2 shows the electron temperature @xmath11 plotted against the mean temperature @xmath39 , which is the temperature we would obtain in a single temperature model .
interestingly , the two - temperature deviation is largest in the whim regime ( indicated by the rectangular box ) .
note that there are some gas elements with @xmath40 .
this is because our simulation does not include electron heating processes other than coulomb collisions .
figure 3 shows the radial distribution of @xmath11 ( solid line ) and @xmath41 ( dashed line ) for one of the most massive halos in our simulation .
we used a friends - of - friends group - finder to locate dark matter halos and define the virial radius such that the mean matter density within this radius is 200 times the critical density .
the halo we consider here has a virial mass of @xmath42 and a virial radius of @xmath43 mpc . in figure 3 ,
the difference between the two temperatures is large at @xmath44 mpc and appreciable even at @xmath45 mpc .
the overall profile looks similar to those found in simulations of single clusters by takizawa ( 1998 ) and chieze et al .
owing to the difference in relaxation time ( see eq .
[ 3 ] ) in the dense central part and in the low density outer regions , the electron temperature profile appears steeper than that of the mean temperature at @xmath46 mpc .
the bottom panel of figure 3 shows the baryonic mass fraction as a function of both @xmath11 and @xmath41 ( thick and thin histograms , respectively ) .
we selected gas particles within 5 @xmath32 mpc of the cluster center .
the distribution of @xmath47 is skewed significantly to smaller values .
the total gas mass contained in this region ( @xmath48 mpc ) is @xmath49 , and nearly 50% of it has @xmath50 kev ; i.e. , the mass of the warm component surrounding the cluster is greater than the gas mass within the cluster itself .
the two - temperature structure of the whim and icm has many important implications .
for example , the relative fractions of metal ions are of considerable interest for whim observations .
figure 4 shows the fraction of ovi , ovii , and oviii ions as a function of temperature assuming collisional ionization equilibrium .
clearly the abundances have a strong dependence on _ electron _ temperature , because the populations are primarily determined by electron collisions ( photo - ionization is unimportant for these high - level ions unless @xmath51k or the incident x - ray intensity is high ) .
the bottom panel indicates the possible errors caused by assuming a single temperature for the whim .
a factor of two systematic shift in temperature , typical of the offsets we find between @xmath41 and @xmath11 near shocks , can lead to significant over / under - estimates of the abundances .
we further quantify the importance of non - equipartition with a model oxygen line emission map .
we put the super - cluster region indicated in figure 1 at @xmath52 and compute the surface brightness of ovii emission following the procedure of yoshikawa et al .
we adopt a simple relation between the gas metallicity and the local gas density of the form @xmath53 , where @xmath54 is the mean baryon density .
we then compute the surface brightness for both @xmath11 and @xmath41 .
figure 5 shows the derived profiles .
while the overall results appear similar in the two cases , there are substantial local deviations .
in particular , around some bright spots , the emissivity is greater by up to an order of magnitude when computed using the electron temperature .
the ratio of the surface brightness @xmath55 is shown in the bottom panel of figure 5 . there
, we mark the regions with @xmath56 , which is the nominal detection limit of the proposed dios mission ( yoshikawa et al .
2003 ) .
similar considerations may also apply to efforts to study the whim using uv observations ( e.g. , furlanetto et al .
2004 ) , although the steep temperature dependence of @xmath57 implies that equipartition is more accurate in this regime ( see fig .
2 ) . in principle , one can measure the degree of equilibration using various line intensities from far uv to soft x - rays ( e.g. , ghavamian et al . 2001 ; raymond et al . 2003 ) as well as the metal line doppler widths . measuring the age of the whim from the degree of equilibration will put a stringent constraint on theoretical models of large - scale _ baryonic _ structure formation .
although our simulation does not include radiative cooling , we note that the lower electron temperature can have a significant impact on the radiative cooling efficiency in dense regions .
the gas cooling rate has a very steep temperature dependence at @xmath58k regardless of the metallicity ( sutherland & dopita 1993 ) .
as shown in figure 2 , recently shock - heated gas with @xmath59k may have an electron temperature @xmath60k .
such gas should cool rapidly and in a highly non - equilibrium manner .
this warrants further study of the effect of the two - temperature structure on the igm using a simulation with radiative cooling .
overall , our simulation suggests that theoretical studies of the whim and correct interpretation of the observational data from current and future x - ray missions requires explicit consideration of these relaxation processes .
|
distribution of baryons in universe remains puzzling in modern cosmology present total amount of baryons from census hi absorption gas stars x - ray emission from hot gas in galaxy clusters smaller than predicted by nucleosynthesis calculations measurements cosmic microwave background radiation believed large fraction of baryons in undiscovered dark _ state three hydrodynamic simulations of cosmic structure formation predict about 3040% of baryons reside in warm - hot intergalactic medium ) gas mostly shock - heated to temperature @xmath3@xmath4 k during large scale structure formation low temperature makes thermal emission difficult to detect with conventional x - ray probes of observational approaches considered for studying whim including ultraviolet and x - ray lines several tentative claims whim detected locally in absorption nicastro emission yoshikawa et al . 2004 ) proposed using ovii / oviii lines to examine whim with high spectral resolution x - ray detectors argue about half of whim can be detected via oxygen line emissionproposed missions promising detectability depends on assumed metallicity abundances ions previous studies used single - temperature model for whim equipartition achieved outskirts of galaxy clusters may have two - temperature structure 1997 1998 2004 near clusters infalling gas shock - heats to virial temperature kinetic energy converted into thermal energy ions carry bulk kinetic energy exceeding electrons post - shock electrons gain thermal energy via collisions with ions if collisional relaxation comparable to longer than age universe two temperatures remain different relaxation time long for warm - hot gas around clusters in large - scale filamentary structures abundance of metal ions emissivities sensitive to electron temperature implications for future observations of whim particularly hotter component study thermal evolution of intergalactic medium using large hydrodynamic simulation structure formation fraction of whim has two - temperature structure particularly in around rich clusters electron temperature smaller than ion temperature by modifying estimates of abundances ions emissivities simulations use parallel tree - pm / sph code gadget2 conservative scheme for integrating equations of motionimplement non - equipartition processes between ions electrons following fox loeb 1997 takizawa 1998 equilibrium in electron - proton plasma achieved after shock electrons ions thermalize into maxwellian distributions on timescales @xmath6 @xmath7 spitzer 1962 @xmath8 @xmath9 electron ion masses protons dominate ionic component equipartition between protons electrons achieved longer @xmath10 assume electrons ions achieve maxwellian distributions with temperatures @xmath11 @xmath12 consider non - equipartition effect spitzer 1962 appropriate timescale given by @xmath13 electric charge charge ion ion number density coulomb logarithm given by @xmath18 hot fully ionized plasma timescale comparable to hubble time in regions with @xmath20 overdensities @xmath21 evolution electron temperature by @xmath22 consider heat conduction suppressed by tangled magnetic fields other electron heating processes plasma instabilities proposed calculations suggest convert less than bulk kinetic energy to electron thermal energy neglect effects treatment maximizes offset between @xmath11 @xmath12work flat @xmath24-dominated cold dark matter cosmology density @xmath25 cosmological constant @xmath26 expansion rate @xmath27 km s mpc set baryon density @xmath29 normalization parameter @xmath30 simulation employs @xmath31 cold dark matter particles non - radiative gas particles cosmological volume 100 @xmath32 mpc mass per gas particle @xmath33 nominal gas mass resolution @xmath34 sph neighbors cdm initial conditions large simulation volume model merging process formation filamentary structures massive halos contribute heating igm intracluster medium figure 1 shows baryon distribution @xmath36 slice 20 @xmath32 mpc thick hot component temperature @xmath37 gas @xmath38 components similar hotter two - temperature structure distribution two - temperature gas complex clusters shocks mergers propagate leave two - temperature gas clusters checked time variation entropy gas elements two - temperature regions shock - heated large - scale structure continuous shock - heating disturbs equipartition close distant gas relaxed figure 2 shows electron temperature @xmath11 mean temperature @xmath39 single temperature modeltwo - temperature deviation largest in whim regime rectangular box gas elements with @xmath40 simulation electron heating processes collisions figure 3 shows radial distribution of @xmath11 and @xmath41 for massive halos used friends - of - friends group - finder to locate dark matter halos virial radius mean matter density 200 times critical density halo has virial mass @xmath42 radius @xmath43 mpc difference temperatures large at @xmath44 mpc appreciable at @xmath45 mpc profile similar to simulations by takizawa 1998 chieze et al difference in relaxation time central low density outer regions electron temperature profile steeper than mean temperature at @xmath46 mpc shows baryonic mass fraction function of @xmath11 and @xmath41 selected gas particles within 5 @xmath32 mpc of cluster center distribution of @xmath47 skewed to smaller values total gas mass is @xmath49 50% has @xmath50 kev mass warm component greater than gas mass cluster two - temperature structure of whim icm implications relative fractions of metal ions for whim observationsfigure 4 shows fraction ovi ovii oviii ions temperature collisional ionization equilibrium abundances on electron temperature populations determined by electron collisions photo - ionization unimportant for high ions unless @xmath51k x - ray intensity high bottom panel indicates errors single temperature for whim factor of two shift temperature @xmath41 @xmath11 over under - estimates abundances quantify importance of non - equipartition with model oxygen line emission map super - cluster region figure 1 at @xmath52 compute surface brightness of ovii emission adopt relation between gas metallicity local gas density of @xmath53 @xmath54 mean baryon density compute surface brightness for @xmath11 @xmath41 figure 5 shows derived profiles results similar substantial local deviations around some bright spots emissivity greater order electron temperature ratio of surface brightness @xmath55 shown in bottom panel figure 5 mark regions with @xmath56 nominal detection limit of proposed dios mission similar considerations apply study whim using uv observations steep temperature dependence of @xmath57 implies equipartition accurate fig . 2equilibration using line intensities uv to x - rays ghavamian 2001 raymond 2003 metal line doppler widths measuring age of whim from equilibration models large - scale baryonic structure formation simulation radiative cooling lower electron temperature radiative cooling efficiency in dense regions gas cooling rate steep temperature dependence at @xmath58k metallicity ( sutherland & dopita 1993 ) shock - heated gas with @xmath59k electron temperature @xmath60k gas cool rapidly non - equilibrium warrants further study effect two - temperature structure on igm radiative cooling simulation suggests theoretical studies of whim interpretation data x - ray requires consideration relaxation processes
| 0.437697
| 2,866
| 1,421
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,486
|
we derive an expression for the spin - current through a tunnel barrier in terms of many - body green s functions .
the spin current has two contributions .
one can be associated with angular - momentum transfer by spin - polarized charge currents crossing the junction .
if there are magnetic moments on both sides of the tunnel junction , due to spin accumulation or ferromagnetic ordering , then there is a second contribution related to the exchange coupling between the moments . 72.25.mk , 72.25.pn , 72.25.-b , 73.23.hk , 85.75.-d
|
in recent years spintronics and magneto - electronic devices have been a major research topic , biased in part by the prospect of new technological applications in information processing based on the simultaneous use both the electron s spin and charge degree of freedom @xcite .
all spintronic devices depend on driven spin currents between different subsystems , which is why a deep understanding of these spin - currents is essential for this field of research .
a naive identification of total transfer of angular momentum with the spin - polarized charge current passed through a junction , @xmath0 , neglects the possibility of spin transfer due to exchange couplings .
the aim of this paper is to derive an expression for the spin current through a tunnel junction , that is suitable to describe interacting electron systems , such as quantum dots , and that explicitly demonstrates the two different contributions to the spin current .
we start our discussion with the calculation of the spin current between a ferromagnetic lead @xmath1 and an island @xmath2 via a tunnel contact . in this first section
, we do not specify the electronic structure of the island yet , i.e. , any kind of many - body effects or couplings of the island to other leads are included .
the hamiltonian of such a tunnel system is given by @xmath3 where @xmath4 are the fermion creation operators in the lead and @xmath5 are the corresponding operator for the island .
in the lead ( island ) we label the momentum states of the electrons with @xmath6 ( @xmath7 ) and the spin with @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( @xmath10 and @xmath11 ) . starting from this hamiltonian
we calculate the spin current in close analogy to the derivation of the charge current by meir and wingreen for interacting electron systems @xcite .
if the spin is a conserved quantity , the time derivative of the total spin in the lead equals the spin current through the tunnel barrier @xmath12 . in the heisenberg picture ,
the time evolution of the spin operator @xmath13 is given by @xmath14 $ ] , which yields @xmath15 where we introduced the keldysh green s functions @xmath16 .
by use of a dyson equation @xcite we can replace the latter with ( free ) green s functions @xmath17 of the lead and green s functions @xmath18 of the island . by choosing the magnetization direction @xmath19 as spin - quantization axis , the lead greens functions @xmath20 are diagonal in the spin index .
the lead green s functions are then @xmath21 , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , and @xmath24 .
there @xmath25 stands for the fermi distribution function in the lead @xmath26 and @xmath27 .
assuming , furthermore , that tunnel events conserve the spin of the electrons , we substitute the tunnel matrix elements by @xmath28 , and define the spin - dependent transition rates @xmath29 . after a lengthy but straightforward calculation , the spin current can be written as @xmath30\nonumber\\ & & + { \bm\sigma}^{}_{\gamma\delta}(\gamma^\gamma_{q , p}-\gamma^\delta_{q , p})\left [ f^+_{\rm l}(\omega)\,(g^{\rm ret}_{q\delta , p\gamma}+g^{\rm adv}_{q\delta , p\gamma})+\frac{1}{i\pi}{\int}^\prime \!\!de\,\frac{g_{q\delta , p\gamma}^<(e)}{e-\omega}\,\right]\ , .\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is the central most general result of our calculation .
since we did not specify the green s functions @xmath31 of the island yet , the expression for the spin current can be used for many situation , including strongly - correlated systems such as quantum dots @xcite . by comparison with the expression of the charge current derived by meir and wingreen @xcite for nonmagnetic systems ,
we identify the first line of eq .
( [ final ] ) with a spin - polarized charge current .
the origin of the spin - current contribution in the second line of eq .
( [ final ] ) is the exchange interaction between lead and island .
if the island does posses a magnetic moment , due to spin accumulation or ferromagnetic order , this moment couples to the magnetization of the lead and both precess around each other @xcite .
this exchange coupling changes the average spin on each side of the tunnel junction , and therefore it must also appear as contribution to the spin current crossing the tunnel barrier . in the latter case ,
the transfered angular moment is perpendicular to the magnetic moments of lead and island , which is sometimes described by `` spin mixing conductances '' @xcite .
for concreteness , we restrict the following discussion to the special case , that the island is an itinerant ferromagnet . thereby the direction of magnetization @xmath32 of the island
encloses a finite angle @xmath33 with the lead magnetization direction .
we further assume , that the island is large , to be also described as a reservoir in thermal equilibrium .
due to the non - collinear magnetization directions , the green s function of the island is non - diagonal in the spin space @xmath34 with the su(2 ) rotations @xmath35 . to simplify the result further
, we assume that the absolute value of the tunnel matrix elements @xmath36 is independent of the momentum index .
then we can replace the transition rates @xmath37 by the spin - resolved density of states @xmath38 and @xmath39 .
after performing all spin summations , we get in lowest - order in the tunnel coupling @xmath40\chi_{\rm l}(\omega)\rho_{\rm i}(\omega)\nonumber \\ & & \lambda_2(\omega)=[f^-_{\rm l}(\omega)f^+_{\rm i}(\omega)-f^+_{\rm l}(\omega)f^-_{\rm
i}(\omega)]\rho_{\rm l}(\omega)\chi_{\rm i}(\omega ) \nonumber \\ & & \lambda_3(\omega)=\frac{1}{\pi}{\int}^\prime \!\!de\,\ , \frac{f^+_{\rm l}(\omega)-f^+_{\rm i}(e)}{\omega - e } \chi_{\rm i}(e)\chi_{\rm l}(\omega)\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the full density of states @xmath41 and the spin - polarization density @xmath42 , and analogue definitions for the lead @xmath1 . in the first and second term we can recognize the spin current contribution of the charge transfer between the two reservoirs . with the cross product @xmath43
the third term shows the typical structure for a precession movement . in the approach of spin dependent circuit theory @xcite
this spin current contribution corresponds to the imaginary part of the spin - mixing conductance .
a very pronounced effect of a spin current is current - induced magnetization reversal @xcite . however , there it is difficult to selectively address the spin - current contribution arising from the exchange interaction .
the latter goal can be achieved , e.g. , in measuring the charge current through a single - level quantum dot connected to two ferromagnetic leads .
a current forced through such a quantum - dot spin valve will accumulate a non - equilibrium spin on the dot .
this spin is sensitive to the exchange field generated by the leads .
its precession is predicted to be visible in the magneto - resistance of the device @xcite .
s. a. wolf , d. d. awschalom , r. a. buhrman , j. m. daughton , s. von molnr , m. l. roukes , a. y. chtchelkanova , d. m. treger , science , * 294 * , 1488 - 1495 ( 2001 ) ; i. zutic , j. fabian , and s. das sarma , rev .
phys . * 76 * , 323 ( 2004 ) .
|
spintronics magneto - electronic devices major research topic biased by new applications information processing electron s spin charge freedom spintronic devices depend on spin currents subsystems deep understanding spin essential for research naive identification of total transfer angular momentum with spin - polarized charge current through junction neglects spin transfer due to exchange couplings aim paper derive expression for spin current through tunnel junction interacting electron systems quantum dots two contributions to spin current start discussion with calculation spin current between ferromagnetic lead @xmath1 island @xmath2 via tunnel contact specify electronic structure island many - body effects couplings other leads hamiltonian of tunnel system given by @xmath3 @xmath4 fermion creation operators lead @xmath5 island label momentum states electrons with @xmath6 @xmath7 ) spin with @xmath8 @xmath9 calculate spin current to derivation charge current by meir wingreen for interacting electron systems if spin conserved quantity time derivative of total spin in lead equals spin current through tunnel barrier @xmath12heisenberg picture time evolution of spin operator @xmath13 given by @xmath14 yields @xmath15 introduced keldysh green s functions @xmath16 dyson equation @xcite replace latter with free green s functions @xmath17 lead and green functions @xmath18 of island choosing magnetization direction @xmath19 as spin - quantization axis lead greens functions @xmath20 diagonal in spin index lead green s functions are @xmath21 @xmath22 @xmath23 @xmath24 @xmath25 for fermi distribution function in lead @xmath26 and @xmath27 tunnel events conserve spin electrons substitute tunnel matrix elements by @xmath28 define spin - dependent transition rates @xmath29 calculation spin current written as @xmath30\nonumber\\\sigma\gamma\delta}\delta\delta\omega central general result of calculationspecify green s functions island expression spin current used for many including correlated systems quantum dots comparison with expression charge current by meir and wingreen for nonmagnetic systems identify first line of eq with spin - polarized charge current origin spin - current contribution second line is exchange interaction between lead and island if island magnetic moment spin couples to magnetization lead precess around other coupling changes average spin each side tunnel junction contribution to spin current crossing tunnel barrier transfered angular moment perpendicular to magnetic moments lead and island described by spin mixing conductances '' restrict discussion island is itinerant ferromagnet direction of magnetization island encloses finite angle with lead magnetization direction island large reservoir in thermal equilibrium non - collinear magnetization directions green s function island non - diagonal in spin space with su(2 ) rotations @xmath35 absolute value of tunnel matrix elements @xmath36 independent of momentum index replace transition rates by spin - resolved density of states @xmath38 and @xmath39performing spin summations lowest - order tunnel coupling @xmath40\chi{\rm l}\rho_{\rm i}\lambda_2(\omega)=[f^-_{\rm l}^+_{\rm\rm\rho_{\rm l}\chi{\rm i}\lambda_3(\omega)=\frac{1}{\pi}{\int}^\prime{f^+_{\rm l})-f^+_{\rm i}\omega\chi_{\rm i}\chi_{\rm l}(\omega)\end{aligned full density states @xmath41 spin - polarization density @xmath42 analogue definitions lead @xmath1 first second term spin current contribution charge transfer reservoirs cross product @xmath43 third term structure precession movement spin dependent circuit theory spin current contribution corresponds spin - mixing conductance current - induced magnetization reversal difficult address spin - current contribution exchange interaction measuring charge current single - level quantum dot ferromagnetic leadscurrent forced through quantum - dot spin valve non - equilibrium spin dot spin sensitive to exchange field leads precession visible in magneto - resistance device wolf awschalom buhrman daughton von molnr roukes chtchelkanova treger science 294, 1488 - 1495 ( 2001 ) zutic fabian das sarma rev . . 76 * , 323 ( 2004 )
| 0.30981
| 1,779
| 876
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
202,487
|
we present some statistical features of the large number of absorption lines detected in high redshift quasar spectra , obtained by using the multifractal approach . in the analysed sample of 12 qso sight lines ,
11 show scaling behaviour with a crossover between two distinct regimes : a non - homogeneous regime at small scales and a homogeneous regime at large scales .
the correlation length shows a redshift dependence , suggesting that the forest can be an intermediate phenomenon between a strongly inhomogeneous galaxy distribution in the local universe and a homogeneous initial mass distribution .
|
the numerous ly@xmath0 absorption lines seen in quasar spectra can be considered a very deep window on the nature of the young universe .
all recent results obtained with high resolution spectroscopy indicate that the associated gas clouds represent most likely a consistent fraction of the dark side of the baryonic matter physically connected with primeval galaxies .
clustering properties have been studied basically using the two point correlation function .
a positive signal was detected in high resolution spectra only for small scales ( up to a few hundred , webb 1987 , rauch et al .
1992 , chernomordik 1995 , cristiani et al .
1996 ) .
the absorption lines can be fitted by voigt profiles in order to obtain hi column densities , doppler widths and redshifts . at high
redshift ( @xmath1 ) the redshift evolution and hi column density distribution is well reproduced by a double power law : @xmath2 where @xmath3 and @xmath4 .
the important features of this kind of non gaussian distribution are the index of the scaling laws and not the amplitudes at every scale and we analyse it using a mathematical tool which is most suitable for their determination .
= 11.6 cm = 5.44 cm = 5.6 cm
in fig . [ f1 ] we show the visual similarity between the distribution of two different physical quantities : the redshift distribution of hi column densities in a quasar spectrum and the kinetic energy dissipation in a fully developed turbulent fluid .
the energy transfer , underlying the phenomenon shown in fig .
[ f1]b , can be described by means of a self similar cascade with an associated multiplicative process : a break down of large scale structures into small scale ones , each receiving a fraction of energy . an analogous mechanism ( for instance in a cdm scenario with an associated inverse cascade " of gravitationally confined structures ) can leads to the phenomenon shown in fig .
the result is an intermittent process , where rare events ( the localized peaks , or singularities , in the distribution ) have a higher probability to occur with respect to a gaussian process .
every scaling process , like turbulence and hi column density distribution in the early universe , can be treated in the context of the fractal formalism or , more generally , the multifractal formalism .
a multifractal is a scale - invariant distribution described by a local exponent @xmath0 @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the probability measure in the @xmath7th interval of size @xmath8 around the point @xmath9 . in a multifractal
, @xmath0 depends on the position @xmath9 . to investigate the multifractal structure of the measure
, we define the generalized partition function of the box counting method ( paladin & vulpiani , 1987 ) : @xmath10^q~,\ ] ] where the sum is extended to all the subsets @xmath7 at a given scale @xmath8 .
the information relative to the multifractal structure can be recognized by calculating the generalized rnyi dimensions @xmath11 from the scaling law : @xmath12^{(q-1)d_q}\ ] ] for the way the partition function is defined , big values of @xmath13 emphasize the scaling properties of overdense regions , while small values those of underdense regions .
a multifractal structure is a non homogeneous fractal ( with different @xmath11 at every @xmath13 ) where the presence of clusters is enhanced by positive values of @xmath13 and that of voids by negative values .
the two point correlation function describes clustering at the first order only , while the infinite set of singularities , each being characterized by a different fractal dimension @xmath11 , describes clustering at every scale and has the important property to show ( in principle ) the _ entire hierarchy of clusters _ ( if any ) .
we have used in a previous paper ( carbone & savaglio , 1996 , hereafter cs96 ) the high resolution spectrum of q@xmath14 ( @xmath15 , cristiani et al .
1995 ) in order to test the multifractality of the forest . for each scale @xmath16 ( between two redshifts @xmath17 and @xmath18 )
we define a probability measure by dividing the redshift range into disjoint subsets @xmath7 .
this measure @xmath19 is defined as the total hi column density in the @xmath7th subset characterized by a velocity separation @xmath16 , normalized to the total column density in the spectrum .
this can be related to the probability of occurrence of a certain amount of gas in the @xmath7-th box at a certain scale @xmath16 .
the results for @xmath20 are shown in fig .
it is evident the presence of two regimes with a linear relation and two different @xmath21 values .
the separation between the two regimes occurs at @xmath22 , which at a mean redshift of @xmath23 corresponds to a comoving scale of about 8 @xmath24 mpc .
similar features are visible for higher values of @xmath13 up to @xmath25 ( cs96 ) . for comparison with the distribution of galaxies in the local universe , one can see martinez et al . 1990 , coleman & pietronero 1992 , borgani et al
. 1994 , martinez & coles 1994 and garrido et al . 1996 . in the multifractal analysis of the qdot redshift survey of 2086 iras galaxies ( dominated by spiral galaxies ) ,
martinez & coles ( 1994 ) found multifractality and observed two regimes for different values of @xmath13 . for @xmath20 , at small scales ( @xmath26 mpc ) they found scaling properties with correlation dimension @xmath27 , which in one dimension corresponds to a fractal dimension of 0.25 ( @xmath28 ) .
for large scales , the iras galaxies reach homogeneity .
we notice that we are comparing the distribution of galaxies of the local universe with that of clouds at high redshift . if the change of regime occurs at similar comoving scales
, we conclude that clouds have undergone a faster clustering evolution compared to iras galaxies .
however multifractality in galaxies is matter of controversy and it is strongly dependent on the galaxy morphology .
the statistics of the forest is poor in comparison with galaxy surveys .
one of the main problems is thus to test the significance of the results .
a first check has been presented in cs96 .
the observed distribution has been compared with a set of 2000 `` fake '' distributions . in a following work ( savaglio & carbone , in preparation ) ,
new tests will be presented and sets of different simulations will be compared to the observed distributions . as very preliminary and crude results ,
we have seen that in 100 simulations of the q@xmath14 sight
line , 53% of the cases shows no scaling law , 37% one single scaling law with @xmath29 . in 10% a very weak double scaling law , with @xmath21 which goes from about 0.6 at small scales to about 0.8 at large scales and a correlation length much smaller than the observed one .
even if a genuine multifractality in the clouds distribution is evident , a richer sample of lines and comparison with simulations would help to clarify this situation .
we applied the box counting method to a sample of qso spectra .
it represents part of the sample used by cristiani et al .
( 1996 ) , with a total of 2412 lines for 12 sight lines .
the redshift coverage is @xmath30 and the resolution better than 15 , the best available for these sources .
the lower limit for the redshift is imposed by the lack of statistics of hst high resolution data .
we restricted our analysis to high resolution spectroscopy in order to minimize the problem of line blanketing ( the confusion of lines ) which at high redshift can dramatically affect the analysis .
= 8.8 cm = 8.5 cm = 6.5 cm the partition functions with @xmath20 for the 12 forests are shown in fig .
we confirm the presence of two regimes in almost all of them , except for one object ( @xmath31 ) , where we do not see any clear scaling law in the distribution . for two objects ( @xmath32 and
@xmath33 ) the determination of the two scales is particularly difficult . for the remaining 9 objects , two slopes are clearly visible . in the plot of @xmath21 as function of the mean redshift for the two different scales ( fig .
[ f4 ] ) there is no correlation for large scales , with a mean value of 0.8 .
this value is an indication that homogeneity has been reached in the sample . for small scales
there is a clear deviation from homogeneity .
a weak correlation with redshift of @xmath21 , being smaller for lower redshifts , can also be noticed .
a more clear redshift evolution is shown by the distribution of the correlation lengths ( fig .
a simple fit with a power law gives : @xmath34 these results suggest a picture where an initial homogeneous distribution of gas clouds or mass in the universe is broken by process of fragmentation ( in a cold dark matter scenario ) or of aggregation of matter around some singularities ( in the hot dark matter scenario ) .
the ultimate fate of both the processes is a highly intermittent distribution like that shown in fig .
the work presented here is in progress .
a more extended analysis , with a full description of different methods testing the stability of the results , will be presented elsewhere . even if the main problem is the lack of statistics
, we can firmly conclude that multi - scaling analysis of forests is a very promising approach to the study of the large scale structure of the universe at high redshift and its evolution .
this has to be regarded as a parallel and complementary point of view with respect to the study of the galaxy distribution .
the two point correlation function analysis can be replaced by different statistics which are more suitable to describe highly inhomogeneous distributions .
clouds have shown scaling laws for much larger scales with respect to previous analysis , around 10 @xmath35 mpc in comoving distance at redshift of about @xmath36 . for larger scales ,
we have no indication against a homogeneous distribution .
the multifractal properties of a sample of 11 quasars show evolution with redshift . in particular both the amplitude and the strength of the multifractality decrease with redshift , which is what one expects to see in a universe where gravitational clustering gives rise to larger , correlated structures .
we are grateful to l. amendola for helpful discussions .
we also thank c. meneveau for kindly providing us with the postscript file of fig .
[ f1]b , and s. cristiani , s. dodorico , v. dodorico , a. fontana and e. giallongo for making the data of the eso key programme available .
borgani s. , martinez v. j. , prez m. a. & valdarnini r. 1994 , apj , 435 , 37 carbone v. , savaglio s. 1996 , mnras , _ in press _ , cs96 chernomordik v. v. 1995 , apj , 440 , 431 coleman p. h. & pietronero , l. 1992 , phys .
, 213 , 311 cristiani s. , dodorico s. , dodorico v.,fontana a. , giallongo e. , savaglio s. 1996 , mnras , _ in press _ cristiani s. , dodorico s. , fontana a. , giallongo e. & savaglio , s. 1995 , mnras , 273 , 1016 garrido p. , lovejoy s. , schertzer d. 1996 , physica a , 225 , 294 martinez v. j. & coles p. 1994 , apj , 437 , 550 martinez v. j. , jones b. j. t. , dominguez
tenreiro r. & van de weygaert r. 1990 , apj , 357 , 50 meneveau c. & sreenivasan k. r. 1991 , j. fluid mech .
, 224 , 429 paladin g. , & vulpiani a. 1987 , phys . rep .
, 156 , 147 rauch m. , carswell r. f. , chaffee f. h. , foltz c. b. , webb j. k. , weymann r. j. , bechtold j. , green r. f. , 1992 , apj , 390 , 387 webb j. k. , 1987 , in : _ iau symposium 124 , observational cosmology _ , ed .
a. hewett , g. burbidge , l. z. fang , p803
|
ly@xmath0 absorption lines in quasar spectra deep window on young universe recent results with high resolution spectroscopy indicate gas clouds represent dark side baryonic matter connected with primeval galaxies clustering properties studied using two point correlation function positive signal detected in high resolution spectra for small scales webb 1987 1992 1996 absorption lines fitted by voigt profiles hi column densities doppler widths redshifts at high redshift ( @xmath1 ) evolution hi column density distribution reproduced by double power law : important features non gaussian distribution are scaling laws not amplitudes analyse using mathematical tool = 11.6 cm = 5.44 cm = 5.6 cm fig . [ f1 ] visual similarity between redshift distribution of hi column densities in quasar spectrum kinetic energy dissipation in turbulent fluid energy transfer phenomenon described self similar cascade with multiplicative process break down of large scale structures into small scale each receiving energy analogous mechanism leads to phenomenon in fig .result intermittent process rare events localized peaks singularities higher probability gaussian process scaling process turbulence hi column density distribution early universe treated fractal formalism multifractal formalism multifractal scale - invariant distribution local exponent @xmath0 @xmath5 @xmath6 probability measure @xmath7th interval size @xmath8 around point @xmath9 @xmath0 depends on position @xmath9 multifractal structure generalized partition function box counting method @xmath10^q~, sum extended to subsets @xmath7 given scale @xmath8 information multifractal structure recognized calculating generalized rnyi dimensions @xmath11 scaling law @xmath12^{(q-1)d_q} big values @xmath13 emphasize scaling properties overdense regions small values underdense regions multifractal structure non homogeneous fractal different @xmath11 at every @xmath13 clusters enhanced by positive values @xmath13 voids negative values two point correlation function describes clustering first order infinite set singularities different fractal dimension @xmath11 describes clustering every scale entire hierarchy of clustersused previous paper carbone savaglio 1996 high resolution spectrum q@xmath14 cristiani 1995 test multifractality forest each scale @xmath16 between redshifts probability measure dividing redshift range subsets @xmath7 measure @xmath19 defined total column density @xmath7th subset velocity separation @xmath16 normalized total column density related probability occurrence certain gas @xmath7-th box certain scale results @xmath20 shown fig . two regimes linear relation two different @xmath21 values separation @xmath22 mean redshift @xmath23 corresponds comoving scale 8 @xmath24 mpc similar features higher values @xmath13 up to @xmath25 comparison distribution galaxies local universe martinez 1990 coleman pietronero 1992 borgani 1994 martinez coles 1994 garrido 1996 multifractal analysis qdot redshift survey 2086 iras galaxies martinez & coles 1994 found multifractality observed two regimes different values @xmath13 @xmath20 small scales found scaling properties correlation dimension @xmath27 corresponds fractal dimension 0.25 ( @xmath28 )large scales iras galaxies reach homogeneity comparing distribution galaxies local with clouds at high redshift if change regime occurs at similar scales conclude clouds faster clustering evolution multifractality in galaxies controversy dependent on galaxy morphology statistics forest poor galaxy surveys test significance results first check presented in cs96 observed distribution compared with 2000 fake distributions following work new tests different simulations compared to distributions preliminary results in 100 simulations of q@xmath14 sight line 53% shows no scaling law 37% single scaling law with @xmath29 10% weak double scaling law with @xmath21 0.6 small to 0.8 large correlation length smaller than observed if genuine multifractality in clouds distribution richer sample lines comparison with simulations clarify applied box counting method to sample qso spectra part of sample cristiani et al . 1996 total 2412 lines for 12 sight lines redshift coverage is @xmath30 resolution better than 15 best sources lower limit for redshift by lack of hst high resolution data restricted analysis to high resolution spectroscopy to minimize line blanketing confusion8.8 cm = 8.5 cm = 6.5 cm partition functions with @xmath20 12 forests shown in fig . confirm two regimes in all except one object ( @xmath31 ) clear scaling law distribution two objects @xmath32 and @xmath33 determination of two scales difficult remaining 9 objects two slopes visible plot of @xmath21 function of mean redshift for two scales no correlation for large scales mean value 0.8 homogeneity reached small scales clear deviation from homogeneity weak correlation with redshift of @xmath21 smaller for lower redshifts noticed clear redshift evolution shown by distribution of correlation lengths fig . simple fit with power law gives : @xmath34 results suggest initial homogeneous distribution of gas clouds mass broken by fragmentation or aggregation around singularities ultimate fate intermittent distribution in fig . work in progress extended analysis description of methods presented elsewhere lack of statistics multi - scaling analysis of forests promising approach study large scale structure universe at high redshift evolution parallel complementary point of view study galaxy distributiontwo point correlation analysis replaced by statistics inhomogeneous distributions clouds shown scaling laws larger scales around 10 @xmath35 mpc at redshift @xmath36 larger scales no indication against homogeneous distribution multifractal properties of 11 quasars show evolution with redshift amplitude strength decrease with redshift gravitational clustering larger structures grateful to l. amendola discussions thank c. meneveau postscript file fig . f1]b s. cristiani dodorico a. fontana e. giallongo data eso key programme borgani s. martinez v. j. prez m. a. valdarnini r. 1994 435 , 37 carbone v. savaglio s. 1996 cs96 chernomordik v 1995 440 , 431 coleman p. pietronero . 1992 phys 213 , 311 cristiani s. dodorico giallongo savaglio s 1996 1995 273 , 1016 garrido p. lovejoy s schertzer d. 1996 225 , 294 martinez v. j. coles p. 1994 437 , 550 martinez vjones b dominguez tenreiro weygaert 1990 357 50 meneveau c sreenivasan k 1991 fluid mech 224 429 paladin g vulpiani a. 1987 156 147 rauch m carswell r chaffee f foltz webb j weymann r bechtold j green r. 1992 390 387 webb j 1987 symposium 124 observational cosmology hewett burbidge z. fang p803
| 0.434658
| 2,878
| 1,471
|
, Saving $0.1 in GPT-4.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.