text
stringlengths
59
1.12k
limitations of the fourth commandment? - What is behind the attitude of her parents? (Her father is a pastor !) - How far here is also the "biological" conception of
marriage at work? - Will they be pleased by her "obedience" or rather be shocked that their "garden" shall never be planted? - What could be done to help her
parents to better understand their daughter? Elsie's case is an encouraging one. She has character. She proves that one of the oncoming generation of African girls is able to make
up her mind by herself instead of being pushed around and dominated. She is on her way to mature womanhood. Africa's future will depend upon this growth. There will be
no free nations, unless there are free couples. There will be no free couples unless the wife grows into true partnership with her husband. It is the responsibility of the
congregation to help toward such growth. It is the solution for Joseph's case as much as for Elsie's and even for our next case. On one trip, I worshipped in
an African church where nobody knew me. After the service I talked to two boys. "How many brothers and sisters do you have?" I asked the first one. "Are they
all from the same stomach?" "Yes, my father is a Christian." "How about you?" I addressed the other boy. He hesitated. In his mind he was adding up. I know
immediately that he came from a polygamous family. "We are nine," he finally said. "Is your father a Christian?" No," was the typical answer, "he is a polygamist." "Are you
baptized?" "Yes, and my brothers and sister too," he added proudly. "And their mothers?" "They are all three baptized, but only the first wife takes communion." "Take me to your
father." The boy led me to a compound with many individual houses. It breathed cleanliness, order and wealth. Each wife had her own house and her own kitchen. The father
-- a middle-aged, good-looking man, tall, fat and impressive -- received me without embarrassment and with apparent joy. Omodo, as we shall call him, was well-educated, wide awake and intelligent,
with a sharp wit and a rare sense of humor. From the outset, he made no apologies for being a polygamist. He was proud of it. Here's the essential content
of our conversation which lasted for several hours. "Welcome to the hut of a poor sinner!" The words were accompanied by good-hearted laughter. "It looks like a rich sinner," I
retorted. "The saints come very seldom to this place," he said, "they don't want to be contaminated with sin." "But they are not afraid to receive your wives and children.
I just met them in church." "I know. I give everyone a coin for the collection plate. I guess I finance half of the church's budget. They are glad to
take my money, but they don't want me." I sat in thoughtful silence. After a while he continued, " I feel sorry for the pastor. By refusing to accept the
polygamous men in town as church members, he has made his flock poor. They shall always be dependent upon subsidies from America. He has created a church of women whom
he tells every Sunday that polygamy is wrong." "Wasn't your first wife heart-broken when you took a second one?" Omodo looked at me almost with pity. "It was her happiest
day," he said finally. "Tell me how it happened." "Well, one day after she had come home from the garden and had fetched wood and water, she was preparing the
evening meal, while I sat in front of my house and watched her. Suddenly she turned to me and mocked me. She called me a `poor man,' because I had
only one wife. She pointed to our neighbor's wife who could care for her children while the other wife prepared the food." "Poor man," Omodo repeated. "I can take much,
but not that. I had to admit that she was right. She needed help. She had already picked out a second wife for me and they get along fine." I
glanced around the courtyard and saw a beautiful young woman, about 19 or 20, come out of one of the huts. "It was a sacrifice for me," Omodo commented. "Her
father demanded a very high bride price." "Do you mean that the wife, who caused you to become a polygamist is the only one of your family who receives communion?"
"Yes, she told the missionary how hard it was for her to share her love for me with another woman. According to the church, my wives are considered sinless because
each of them has only one husband. I, the father, am the only sinner in our family. Since the Lord's supper is not given to sinners, I am excluded from
it. Do you understand that, pastor?" I was entirely confused. "And you see," Omodo continued, "they are all praying for me that I might be saved from sin, but they
don't agree from which sin I must be saved." "What do you mean?" "Well, the pastor prays that I may not continue to commit the sin of polygamy. My wives
pray that I may not commit the sin of divorce. I wonder whose prayers are heard first." "So your wives are afraid that you become a Christian?" "They are afraid
that I become a church member. Let's put it that way. For me there is a difference. You see, they can only have intimate relations with me as long as
I do not belong to the church. In the moment I would become a church member, their marriage relations with me would become sinful." "Wouldn't you like to become a
church member?" "Pastor, don't lead me into temptation ! How can I become a church member if it means disobeying Christ? Christ forbade divorce, but not polygamy. The church forbids
polygamy but demands divorce. How can I become a church member if I want to be a Christian? For me there is only one way: be a Christian without the
church." "Have you ever talked to your pastor about that?" "He does not dare to talk to me, because he knows as well as I do that some of his
elders have a second wife secretly. The only difference between them and me is that I am honest and they are hypocrites." "Did a missionary ever talk to you?" "Yes,
once. I told him that with the high divorce rate in Europe, they have only a successive form of polygamy while we have a simultaneous polygamy. That did it. He
never came back." I was speechless. Omodo accompanied me back to the village. He evidently enjoyed being seen with a pastor. "But tell me, why did you take a third
wife?" I asked him. "I did not take her. I inherited her from my later brother, including her children. Actually my older brother would have been next in line. But
he is an elder. He is not allowed to sin by giving security to a widow." I looked in his eyes. "Do you want to become a Christian?" "I am
a Christian." Omodo said without smiling. What does it mean to take responsibility as a congregation for Omodo? I am sorry that I was not able to see Omodo again.
Our conversation contains in a nutshell the main attitudes of polygamists toward the church. It is always healthy to see ourselves with the eyes of an outsider. I asked myself:
What would I have done if I were the pastor in Omodo's town? Let me share with you my thoughts and then ask for your criticism. They are based on
many experiences in dealing with other polygamist families. Maybe you have better ideas than I have. Please, help me to help Omodo. The trouble with Omodo is that, unlike Joseph
or Elsie, he did not ask for help. But that does not mean that he is not in need of help. The fact that he did almost all the talking
and hardly gave me a chance, proves his inner insecurity. His sarcasm showed me that deep down in his heart he was afraid of me. In order to take this
fear away, I accepted defeat. You will have noticed that I was a defeated person when I left him. If you want to win someone over, nothing better can happen
to you than defeat. In the eyes of the world the cross of Jesus Christ was a defeat. Yet, God saved the world by this defeat. In talking with people
we must remember this truth. We can easily win an argument, but lose a person. Our task is not to defend, but to witness. Humble acceptance of defeat is often
the most convincing testimony we can give for our humble Lord. It is the one thing which the other one does not expect. Counseling is not preaching at a short
distance. It is ninety percent listening. When I have a conversation like this I ask myself first of all, where is the other one right? I think Omodo is right
in his criticism of contradictory church policies, which sometimes deny our own doctrines. We have made the church the laughing-stock of a potentially polygamous society. We have often acted according
to the statement, "There are three things that last forever: faith, hope and love, but the greatest of them all is church order and discipline." Some churches demand that a
polygamous man separate himself from all his wives, some from all but one. Others demand that he keep the first one; others allow him to choose. Some allow that his
wives stay with him under the condition that he has no intercourse with them. Some do not even allow polygamists to enter the catechumen class. Others allow them, but do
not baptize them. Again others baptize them, but do not give them communion. A few allow them full church membership, but forbid them to hold office. The most generous solution
was to baptize a polygamist only on his death bed. It happened to a Swedish missionary once that such a polygamist did not die but recovered after baptism. The church
council decided, "Such things must not happen." They did not specify whether they referred to the recovery of the polygamist or to his baptism. We have made ourselves fools before
the world with our policies. Let us admit honestly our helplessness first of all. We are facing a problem where we just do not know what to do. Maybe our
mistake is that we want to establish a general law for all cases. We want to be like God, knowing what is good and evil and have decided that monogamy
is "good" and polygamy "evil" while the Word of God clearly does not say so. The Old Testament has no outspoken commandment against polygamy and the New Testament is conspicuously
silent about it. Instead of dealing with polygamy, the Bible has a message for polygamists. Therefore let us not deal with an abstract problem. Instead let us meet a concrete
person. Let us meet Omodo. Is he a special case? Well, every one of us is a "special case" in one way or another. There are no two persons exactly
alike. Still, if we can help in one case like that of Omodo's, we might find the key to deal with many others. So, what would I have done? First
of all, I would have gone back to visit him again. Church discipline, as the New Testament understands it, starts with me, not with the other one. If possible, I
would have taken my wife along. I would have asked her to tell Omodo what she would think of me if I let her work all day in the garden,
get wood and water, care for the children and prepare the food while I sit idly in the shade all day under the eaves of my hut and watch her
work. I think she would have told him that he does not have three wives, but actually he has no wife at all. He is married to three female slaves.
Consequently, he is not a real husband; he's just a married male. Only a real husband makes a wife a real wife. In the meantime I would have talked to
Omodo's first wife and told her precisely the same, that only a real wife makes a husband a real husband. I would have challenged her because she had not demanded
enough from her husband. She had behaved like an overburdened slave trying to solve her problem by getting a second slave. Instead, she should have asked her husband to help
her. She should have behaved like a partner and expected partnership. She probably would have thought I was joking and not have understood at all. So I would have explained
and we would have talked, visit after visit, week after week. Then finally I would have asked her why she ridiculed her husband. I am sure there was something deeper
behind it, a concrete humiliation for which she took revenge, a hidden hatred. At the same time, I would have continued to talk to Omodo -- not telling him anything
which I had learned from his wife, but listening to his side of the story. I am sure I would have heard precisely the opposite of what his wife had
said. I would have tried to make him understand his wife and to make his wife understand her husband. Then, maybe after months, I would have started to see them
both together at the same time, possibly again accompanied by my wife. The best way to teach marriage of partnership is by example. One day we were discussing this in
our "marriage class," a one-year course I taught at Cameroon Christian College. The students were telling me that African women are just not yet mature enough to be treated as
equal partners. While we were discussing this, rain was pouring down. We watched through the window of the classroom the wife of the headmaster of our primary schools, who jumped
from her bicycle and sought refuge under the roof of the school building. After a little while a car drove up. Out stepped her husband. He handed her the car
keys, and off she drove with the car, while he followed her on the bicycle getting soaked in the rain. This settled the argument. It is up to the husband
to make his wife a partner. Then, one day I would have attacked the case of the second wife. I can imagine her story. She probably was given into marriage
with Omodo for a high bride price at a very young age. I would have tried to find out how she felt about her situation. Young and attractive as she
was, I cannot imagine that she was so terribly excited by old fat Omodo. It is very likely that she had a young lover alongside. I have found that women
in polygamous marriages often live in adultery, because their husbands, staying usually with one wife for a week at a time, are not able to satisfy them. Solving the problem
of the second wife would involve talks with her father and "fathers" and also with the young man she really loves. It would have been a hard battle, but I
do not think a hopeless one. It is a question of faith. I would trust Jesus that He can do a miracle. I would ask some Christians in the congregation
who understand the power of prayer to pray when I talk to the father. Every father wants to have a happy daughter. I would try to convince him to pay
the bride price back to Omodo (or at least a part of it). The first time I would have suggested to Omodo to let his second wife go, he probably
would have thrown me out the front door. So I would have entered again through the back door. I would have tried to tire him out by an unceasing barrage
of love. It is very important that by now a very deep personal contact and friendship is established between Omodo and me, a "partnership in swimming." In this partnership Jesus
Christ becomes a reality between us even when His name is not mentioned in every conversation. One day, I think, Omodo would have admitted that he did not take his
second wife just out of unselfish love for his first one, but that he considered his first wife as dark bread when he had appetite for a piece of candy.
Now, we could start to talk meaningfully about sin. Not about the sinfulness of polygamy, but about concrete sins in his polygamous state. To talk to a polygamist about the
sinfulness of polygamy is of as little help as talking to a soldier about the sinfulness of war or to a slave about the sinfulness of slavery. Paul sent the
slave Onesimus back to his slave master, while at the same time he proclaimed a message incompatible with slavery which finally caused its downfall. Paul broke the institution of slavery
from inside, not from outside. This is a law in God's kingdom which can be called the "law of gradual infiltration." It took centuries until slavery was outlawed. God is
very patient. Why are we so impatient? So I would have talked to Omodo about his selfishness. I would have talked to his first wife about her hatred, lies and
hypocrisy and to the second one about her adultery. In the minute they began to see how these things separate them from God, it would not have been difficult to
make them aware of their need of forgiveness. Then we could have talked about reconciliation with God. This reconciliation would have happened through the absolution. "He has enlisted us in