text
stringlengths
59
1.12k
Copyright Acts.) "Jesus took the man aside, away from the crowd ... and said to him 'Be opened.' With that his ears were opened, and at the same time the
impediment was removed." (Mark 7:33-35) What we need is a message tailored for each individual. In a concrete situation, general principles alone are not enough. Let us therefore take three
people aside -- away from the crowd. Let us try to help them and take responsibility for them as a congregation. All three of them are real persons. They come
from three different African countries, thousands of miles apart, but I shall not tell you from which countries and I have changed their names. They have given me permission to
use their cases as an example, so I am not breaking their confidence. Joseph is a 26-year-old teacher at a mission school. I never met him, but we corresponded for
almost three years. He wrote me after he had read my book I Loved a Girl:Three years ago I married a 15 year-old person. I have ten years of schooling,
my wife only six. God blessed us one year ago with a baby. I purposely did not choose a. girl with a higher level of education, for I intended to
educate my wife in order that she become exactly as I wanted her to be in her work and cleanliness, in her whole life. But she does not satisfy me
any more with her obedience. She does not do what I command her to do. If I insist, we quarrel. I ask you for a solution to save this young
marriage. In order to help Joseph we have to understand his way of thinking. For him, marriage is an alliance with an inferior being. For him, a woman is primarily
a garden. Man is then primarily the bearer of the seed of life. Such is their mutual destiny. Their destiny decides their function. Their function defines their relationship. According to
this conception the woman can never be as important as the man, any more than the soil can be as important as the seed. By her very nature, she is
secondary, auxiliary. This is the root of all discrimination between man and woman that has shaped the history of mankind, not only in Africa, but also in Asia and --
until recently -- in Europe and America. This conception of marriage is not only based on a wrong and inaccurate biology. It is also not in accordance with the New
Testament which conceives of husband and wife as equal partners before God. My task was to change Joseph's image of marriage. Here is my answer:Joseph, you have not married a
wife. You have married a daughter. You were looking for a maid, obedient to your commandments. She was 15 when you married her. Now she is 18. In these three
years she has developed from a girl to a young woman. In addition she has become a mother. This has changed her personality completely. She wants to be treated as
a person. She wants to become your partner . . . It strikes me that your quarreling started after God gave you a baby. How long is the period of
lactation in your tribe? Could it be that your quarreling has a deeper reason? It is not God's will for a married couple to abstain from physical union for such
a long time.Joseph's answer came quickly:You are exactly right . . . It is true that we abstain from sex relations for two years after the birth of a child
... This habit is incorporated in us. Otherwise we are afraid of losing the baby, especially if the mother breast-feeds it and if it is a boy .. . My
father - in - law pointed this out to me when our child was born. The practice of abstaining from sex relations during the period of lactation presupposes a polygamous
society. According to the biological conception of marriage, a man can have several gardens to be planted one after the other. A garden can have one proprietor only, Joseph wants
to be a Christian. He has been taught by his church that polygamy is sin. But he has been left with this negative message. He has not received any positive
advice on how to live with one wife as a partner, nor has he been told how to space his children. It is interesting that Joseph did not confide his
problem to his pastor. Evidently he did not expect any help from the pastor. Still, Joseph looks for a counselor. He may find that counselor in a questionable friend, maybe
one that is not even a Christian, and he may be advised to do things which are poison for his marriage. The method our couple uses for spacing their children
-- complete abstention -- will lead to an estrangement and husband and wife will slowly drift apart. Let us imagine that Joseph would have tried to solve his problem by
taking a second wife. It is evident that refusing him communion as punishment for this action would have been the most inadequate answer to his problem on how to space
his children. What is needed in Africa are not church disciplinarians, but marriage counselors. In this case had Joseph not gone ahead and simply taken a second wife, but confided
his intention to his pastor, explaining his motive, would his pastor have been able to help? Would the pastor have received enough training in this respect at the seminary? When
a Christian takes a second wife, it is mostly due to the fact that his congregation has not carried responsibility for him. It is unkind and merciless if missionaries condemn
polygamy as sin, but keep silent to Africans about methods of conception control which they themselves use. It is even more so because a missionary usually has powdered milk at
his disposal while an African villager does not. Let us imagine another possibility. Maybe Joseph did not take a second wife, but secretly had sexual relations with an unknown girl,
or even the wife of another man. In other words, he had committed adultery. Now, since he wants to be a Christian, his conscience hurts him. What could he have
done? Would he have found someone in your congregation to whom he could have gone, confessed his sin and received the absolution? If he had come to you, whether you
are a pastor or not, would you have known what to do? What is needed in Africa are not ex-communicators but confessors who are keep the secret of confession absolute.
What kind of training do our pastors receive in this respect? Here is the heart of the congregational responsibility for the individual. The offer of private confession is probably the
most helpful contribution the Lutheran Church could make to the African churches as a whole. Martin Luther said: "No one knows what private confession can do for him, except he
who has struggled much with the devil. Yes the devil would have slain me long ago, if the confession would not have sustained me." It is also possible that Joseph
would not have dared to confess, but maybe you would have heard anyway about his sin. Then it would have been your duty to go to him. Responsibility for the
individual means to take the initiative. Just as God has taken the initiative in Jesus Christ and has spoken to us without our inviting Him, so we have to take
the initiative and talk to our brother, even if he does not ask us. This is "church discipline" according to the New Testament. "Go ye therefore ..." not to put
him out of the church but to win him back to Jesus Christ (Matthew 18:15; 2 Thessalonians 3:15; 2 Timothy 2:25). Church discipline means to go and to win, not
to wait and to judge. There is not time to report the case of Joseph in full. The relationship between him and his wife improved after I informed him about
other methods of conception control. Later on a new problem arrived. The family moved from the village to town. While living in the village Joseph's wife had fed her family
from that which she had grown in her own garden. But in town she did not have a garden. She had to go shopping. Joseph had to give her money,
which had rarely happened before. Here is Joseph's letter:Tell me how to make up a family budget and how to convince a woman -- however idiotic she may be --
to keep it. Most of the time my wife buys things which we don't need and then they spoil.I made up a detailed monthly budget according to Joseph's income and
included as one item, "pocket money for each one of you." Joseph wrote:My wife was very happy about it. After we had divided up the money, she was frank enough
to tell me also the criticisms which she had in her heart about my spending habits. She was overwhelmed by joy to see the item, "pocket money for each one
of you." This was, after almost three years of correspondence, the first time that Joseph had reported to me a reaction of his wife. The fact that he had shared
my letter with her, that he even listened to her reproaches, but above all the fact that he gave her spending money, shows that his marriage had grown from a
patriarchal pattern where the husband-father dominates his wife, into a marriage of partnership. A garden cannot rejoice and talk. One cannot listen to a garden. Joseph's wife had changed from
a garden to a person. She had become a wife. Formerly, the course of life was channeled. The individual made very few decisions on his own. The road was marked
by customs and traditions. This had changed now. The individual has to make up his mind about many things which formerly were decided by the family and the group. But
-- as the case of Joseph and his wife shows -- the individual is not trained to make these decisions. Counseling therefore becomes indispensable. It belongs to the responsibility of
the congregation. It is the service which the Christian church must give in a situation of social change. The work of the counselor can be compared best of all with
"swimming." The time is past when a counselor could stand on a solid hilltop and give prefabricated rules and commandments to the counselee. The counselor has to descend from the
hilltop and go into the water. Counselor and counselee have to swim together. With this picture of "swimming" in mind, the fact of uncertainty is expressed. At the outset the
counselor may be more in need of advice than his counselee. But he swims together with him, trying to make. out beforehand the whirlpools and the rapids, the islands and
the riverbanks. For a limited time, while exploring the situation for clarification and solutions, the counselor becomes the partner of his counselee. God is in this situation and the counselor
has to find his will together with the counselee. Only what the latter is able and willing to accept and put into practice will help him. The development of Joseph's
marriage during the time of our correspondence proves that marriage guidance by letter can be fruitful. It may even be easier to confide the most intimate problems to a complete
stranger. Because of the long distances and the lack of trained counselors, marriage guidance by mail has great promise in Africa, all the more because a personal letter there is
highly treasured. It gives the receiver the experience of "being taken aside, away from the crowd," to have his impediment removed. Marriage guidance is not only a counseling task. It
is also a missionary opportunity. Since marriage is part of practical Christian living, the Christian marriage counselor has the possibility of proclaiming the Gospel to non-Christians along with the advice
he gives. Marriage has become the problem of life today. People of all confessions, religions, classes and races are interested in it. Every heathen, Muslim or Communist will listen to
those who have something useful to say about marriage. As Christians, I believe we do have something useful to say. But, do we say it? Or is the church in
possession of a treasure of knowledge and wisdom and is keeping it locked up instead of handing it out? Elsie is a high school student and the daughter of a
"minister of religion" as she calls it. I know her too only by letter. She wrote to me and asked: "How can I meet a Christian boy?" I advised her
to attend church. There she could meet boys. Here is her answer:The old people in our churches don't want boys to meet girls, not even to talk to them in
their presence. Always the Sunday service begins by speaking against boys and girls. This has turned away most of the boys and girls from attending church. The other day the
pastor said: "If any boy has written to you a letter, return it to him and tell him never to write to you any letter."I answered, but for a long
time did not hear from Elsie. Later I learned that her school principal had confiscated my letter. I was not on the list of men with whom she was allowed
to correspond. So my letter went to her parents, who lived in a small village hundreds of miles away from her school. It took three months before the permission came
and my letter was handed over to Elsie. Finally she wrote again:I have met a boy who is not of my tribe. He is a keen Christian and a student
in a secondary school. It appears to me as if he would make a good husband according to the direction in your book I Loved a Girl. I went home
and talked to my parents about him. They said they would not allow me to marry from any other tribe apart from mine. They claim that men from my boyfriend's
tribe are going about with other women, even if they are married. I have tried to tell them that not all men from that tribe are bad, but they insist
on my marrying someone from my own tribe. Since we are told that we should honor our parents, I cannot do something which is against their will. To make it
worse: I do not live at home. I know very few boys from my own tribe. Seeing that this boy is interested in me, should I disregard my parents' advice?
In my answer I advised Elsie to take her boyfriend home once and present him to her parents so that they could meet him as a person. If she is
certain about God's will for her marriage, she should obey God more than men. Elsie's answer:My parents have become impossible. They cannot approve the choice I have made. They say
they have heard rumors that the man I have chosen was misbehaving at college. But ever since I met him, he has never showed me any nonsense. I have decided
to remain single for the whole of my life, unless I can marry him.Marriage between two Christians must be based on mutual trust and confidence. Confidence demands free choice. Free
choice demands opportunities where young people can meet in a healthy atmosphere without suspicion. It belongs to the responsibility of the congregation to provide such opportunities. Many marriage problems in
Africa have their root in the fact that the couple never had time and opportunity to really meet and get acquainted before marriage. Many African boys and girls have a
list with names of a limited number of persons with whom they correspond. In a society where the meeting of the sexes is still difficult, also for outward reasons, we
have to recognize that letter-writing as a means to establish contacts, can be a good one. Instead of intercepting mail, schools should rather teach criteria of how to evaluate a
letter and give helpful instructions for answering. Elsie's case reflects two areas of conflict. There is the conflict between the younger and older generation. Dealing with parents, uncles and grandparents
is probably the thorniest problem of a marriage counselor in Africa. It has been overlooked that, in a fast-changing society, the education of the older generation is also a responsibility
of the congregation. The church may have to speak out on the rules of exogamy (the tradition forcing a young man to find a bride outside a defined group of
relatives) or endogamy (reversely, the rule that a bride can only be found within a close core of relatives.) Once a young African wrote me that he had 11,000 girls
("sisters") in his tribe which he could not marry. Unfortunately, he had fallen in love with one of them. There is also the conflict between individual freedom and the obligation
to tradition and family. Elsie has new possibilities of choice, unknown to her parents. She is caught between (1) making use of this freedom and (2) submission to rules originating
from customs no longer relevant to her situation. Like Joseph, she is in need of personal counseling in her new freedom. Her decision to renounce this freedom and the wish
of her heart, even against the advice of her counselors, poses lots of questions: - If you had been her counselor, what would you have advised her to do? -
Assuming that God called Elsie to stay single, would it be possible for her to put this' decision into practice? - Does our church have a message for single girls?
- What would be the responsibility of her congregation for her? - Is the decision against individual freedom and for submission to tradition always God's will? - Where are the