issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100,820 | Bug 100820 [source actions] [5.0] create constructor using fields adds wrong super call to enum | 3.1-RC2 - have the cu below - select Source>Create Ctor using fields --------- Natural.java ----- enum Natural { ONE, TWO; private final int fField; } ---------------------------- Expected ctor: private Natural(int field) { // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub fField = field; } Actual ctor: private Natural(String na... | verified fixed | 45fff34 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-08-30T16:39:14Z | 2005-06-20T15:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/GenerateNewConstructorUsingFieldsAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
102,883 | Bug 102883 [source actions] [5.0] Create constuctor from fields in enum allows illegal modifiers | Eclipse 3.1.0 Build I20050627-1435 When using create constructor from fields for an enum, the dialog allows the public and protected modifiers, which are illegal for enum constructors. Should instead allow only default and private access. | verified fixed | f05e6d3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-08-30T16:58:17Z | 2005-07-06T17:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
102,883 | Bug 102883 [source actions] [5.0] Create constuctor from fields in enum allows illegal modifiers | Eclipse 3.1.0 Build I20050627-1435 When using create constructor from fields for an enum, the dialog allows the public and protected modifiers, which are illegal for enum constructors. Should instead allow only default and private access. | verified fixed | f05e6d3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-08-30T16:58:17Z | 2005-07-06T17:13:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/StubUtility2.java | |
102,883 | Bug 102883 [source actions] [5.0] Create constuctor from fields in enum allows illegal modifiers | Eclipse 3.1.0 Build I20050627-1435 When using create constructor from fields for an enum, the dialog allows the public and protected modifiers, which are illegal for enum constructors. Should instead allow only default and private access. | verified fixed | f05e6d3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-08-30T16:58:17Z | 2005-07-06T17:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/actions/GenerateConstructorUsingFieldsSelectionDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
102,883 | Bug 102883 [source actions] [5.0] Create constuctor from fields in enum allows illegal modifiers | Eclipse 3.1.0 Build I20050627-1435 When using create constructor from fields for an enum, the dialog allows the public and protected modifiers, which are illegal for enum constructors. Should instead allow only default and private access. | verified fixed | f05e6d3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-08-30T16:58:17Z | 2005-07-06T17:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SourceActionDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,143 | Bug 101143 Promote temp to filed shouldn't use constructor code template | RC3 This refactoring is using the constructor template. Since the code we generate isn't something the user has to look at we shouldn't use the template. | verified fixed | 6be1183 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-08-30T17:15:01Z | 2005-06-21T21:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PromoteTempToField/canPromote/A_test4_out.java | package p;
//initialize in constructors
class A{
private int i;
/**
*
*/
A() {
i= 0;
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
}
void f(){
i++;
}
} |
101,143 | Bug 101143 Promote temp to filed shouldn't use constructor code template | RC3 This refactoring is using the constructor template. Since the code we generate isn't something the user has to look at we shouldn't use the template. | verified fixed | 6be1183 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-08-30T17:15:01Z | 2005-06-21T21:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PromoteTempToField/canPromote/A_testEnum1_out.java | //6, 13, 6, 16
package p;
enum A {
ONE, TWO();
private final int fVar;
/**
*
*/
A() {
fVar= 0;
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
}
public void f(){
}
}
|
101,143 | Bug 101143 Promote temp to filed shouldn't use constructor code template | RC3 This refactoring is using the constructor template. Since the code we generate isn't something the user has to look at we shouldn't use the template. | verified fixed | 6be1183 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-08-30T17:15:01Z | 2005-06-21T21:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
101,143 | Bug 101143 Promote temp to filed shouldn't use constructor code template | RC3 This refactoring is using the constructor template. Since the code we generate isn't something the user has to look at we shouldn't use the template. | verified fixed | 6be1183 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-08-30T17:15:01Z | 2005-06-21T21:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/PromoteTempToFieldRefactoring.java | |
102,846 | Bug 102846 [quick fix] Convert to enhanced for loop does not remove obsolete import | I20050627-1435 (3.1) The 'Convert to enhanced for loop' quick fix does not remove the obsolete import java.util.Iterator in this example: import java.util.Iterator; import java.util.List; public class Try { public static void print(List<String> names) { for (Iterator iter= names.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) { String na... | verified fixed | 249eee4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T09:32:10Z | 2005-07-06T14:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/ConvertIterableLoopQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and is a... |
102,846 | Bug 102846 [quick fix] Convert to enhanced for loop does not remove obsolete import | I20050627-1435 (3.1) The 'Convert to enhanced for loop' quick fix does not remove the obsolete import java.util.Iterator in this example: import java.util.Iterator; import java.util.List; public class Try { public static void print(List<String> names) { for (Iterator iter= names.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) { String na... | verified fixed | 249eee4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T09:32:10Z | 2005-07-06T14:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ConvertIterableLoopProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and is a... |
96,949 | Bug 96949 [refactoring] Convert anonymous: generates unnecessary call to super() | Against I20050527-0010 Given code: public void foo(final int pVar1) { final int lVar2= 1; Runnable r= new Runnable() { public void run() { int x= pVar1 + lVar2; } }; } When converting anonymous inner class to nested class TheThing, the generated class contains an unnecessary call to super() in the constructor: private ... | verified fixed | dfaef22 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T09:43:51Z | 2005-05-27T10:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ConvertAnonymousToNested/canConvert/A_test11_out.java | package p;
class A{
private final class Inner extends A {
private final int u;
int k= u;
private Inner(int u) {
super();
this.u= u;
k= u;
}
}
void f(){
final int u= 9;
new Inner(u);
}
} |
96,949 | Bug 96949 [refactoring] Convert anonymous: generates unnecessary call to super() | Against I20050527-0010 Given code: public void foo(final int pVar1) { final int lVar2= 1; Runnable r= new Runnable() { public void run() { int x= pVar1 + lVar2; } }; } When converting anonymous inner class to nested class TheThing, the generated class contains an unnecessary call to super() in the constructor: private ... | verified fixed | dfaef22 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T09:43:51Z | 2005-05-27T10:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ConvertAnonymousToNested/canConvert/A_test18_out.java | package p;
class A{
private final class Inner extends A {
private final int u;
private Inner(int u) {
super();
this.u= u;
}
void g(){
int uj= u;
}
}
void f(){
final int u= 9;
new Inner(u);
}
} |
96,949 | Bug 96949 [refactoring] Convert anonymous: generates unnecessary call to super() | Against I20050527-0010 Given code: public void foo(final int pVar1) { final int lVar2= 1; Runnable r= new Runnable() { public void run() { int x= pVar1 + lVar2; } }; } When converting anonymous inner class to nested class TheThing, the generated class contains an unnecessary call to super() in the constructor: private ... | verified fixed | dfaef22 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T09:43:51Z | 2005-05-27T10:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ConvertAnonymousToNested/canConvert/A_test19_out.java | package p;
class A{
private final class Inner extends A {
private final int u;
int l= 9;
int p0= 2, k= u, k1= k;
int l1= l+1, p, q= p+u;
private Inner(int u) {
super();
this.u= u;
k= u;
q= p+u;
}
}
void f(){
final int u= 8;
new Inner(u);
}
} |
96,949 | Bug 96949 [refactoring] Convert anonymous: generates unnecessary call to super() | Against I20050527-0010 Given code: public void foo(final int pVar1) { final int lVar2= 1; Runnable r= new Runnable() { public void run() { int x= pVar1 + lVar2; } }; } When converting anonymous inner class to nested class TheThing, the generated class contains an unnecessary call to super() in the constructor: private ... | verified fixed | dfaef22 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T09:43:51Z | 2005-05-27T10:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
96,949 | Bug 96949 [refactoring] Convert anonymous: generates unnecessary call to super() | Against I20050527-0010 Given code: public void foo(final int pVar1) { final int lVar2= 1; Runnable r= new Runnable() { public void run() { int x= pVar1 + lVar2; } }; } When converting anonymous inner class to nested class TheThing, the generated class contains an unnecessary call to super() in the constructor: private ... | verified fixed | dfaef22 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T09:43:51Z | 2005-05-27T10:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ConvertAnonymousToNestedRefactoring.java | |
88,563 | Bug 88563 [code manipulation] Offer implicit functions as override/implement options | A class that implements Cloneable may need to implement clone(). A class that implements Serializable may need to implement readObject/writeObject. These special methods could usefully be offered as Source->Override/Implement Methods options. | verified fixed | ee71d9f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T10:07:55Z | 2005-03-19T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/OverrideMethodDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
103,026 | Bug 103026 When detected a 1.5 JDK on a fresh workspace as a default the default compiler complaince should be switch to 5.0 | 3.1 Compiling with compiler complaince 1.4 against a 5.0 VM can cause some trouble with covariant return types. Therefore when detecting the default VM for a fresh workspace the launching plug-in should switch the default compiler compliance to 5.0 when a 1.5 VM is detected. | verified fixed | 07e71ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T13:43:57Z | 2005-07-07T15:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/JavaProjectWizardFirstPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
102,907 | Bug 102907 [refactoring] Rename field Preview dialog misplaced on desktop, is overlaid by Dock | MacOS 10.4.1, OS X Dock set to right edge of primary screen (I work with two Eclipse windows - one on the main laptop screen, and one on a separate monitor to the left of the main laptop screen). In a Java source file select a field, preferably one mentioned in comments to force a Preview below. Select Rename... from R... | verified fixed | b8a561f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-05T16:53:55Z | 2005-07-06T17:13:20Z | org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring/src/org/eclipse/ltk/internal/ui/refactoring/RefactoringWizardDialog2.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,312 | Bug 108312 [typing] Smart semicolong option should support anonymizing a class | 1) Place the caret between the closing parenthesis ')' and semicolon ';'. 2) Type an open brace '{'. 3) Type Enter key (carriage return). See that closing brace '}' is automatically added, but semicolon ';' is illegally misplaced. ----------------- Bug.java ------------------------ class Bug { Object object=new Object(... | verified fixed | 45e39ce | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T08:12:43Z | 2005-08-29T21:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests/src/org/eclipse/jdt/text/tests/SmartSemicolonAutoEditStrategyTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,312 | Bug 108312 [typing] Smart semicolong option should support anonymizing a class | 1) Place the caret between the closing parenthesis ')' and semicolon ';'. 2) Type an open brace '{'. 3) Type Enter key (carriage return). See that closing brace '}' is automatically added, but semicolon ';' is illegally misplaced. ----------------- Bug.java ------------------------ class Bug { Object object=new Object(... | verified fixed | 45e39ce | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T08:12:43Z | 2005-08-29T21:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/JavaAutoIndentStrategy.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,312 | Bug 108312 [typing] Smart semicolong option should support anonymizing a class | 1) Place the caret between the closing parenthesis ')' and semicolon ';'. 2) Type an open brace '{'. 3) Type Enter key (carriage return). See that closing brace '}' is automatically added, but semicolon ';' is illegally misplaced. ----------------- Bug.java ------------------------ class Bug { Object object=new Object(... | verified fixed | 45e39ce | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T08:12:43Z | 2005-08-29T21:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/SmartSemicolonAutoEditStrategy.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
103,706 | Bug 103706 [formatter] indent empty lines | The formatter clears today all empty lines. Many of us like to start typing at the cursor position, without the well known 'up-line-end-enter semantic' that creates a well idented position. Because we use our formatter as a project-specific (cvs) setting, i need today to patch _every_ eclipse stable build (we uuse them... | verified fixed | f651d2f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T12:25:18Z | 2005-07-13T21:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/FormatterMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
103,706 | Bug 103706 [formatter] indent empty lines | The formatter clears today all empty lines. Many of us like to start typing at the cursor position, without the well known 'up-line-end-enter semantic' that creates a well idented position. Because we use our formatter as a project-specific (cvs) setting, i need today to patch _every_ eclipse stable build (we uuse them... | verified fixed | f651d2f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T12:25:18Z | 2005-07-13T21:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/IndentationTabPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
102,645 | Bug 102645 [open type] Open Type history shows stale visibility info in type history | 3.1 Steps to reproduce: - Open a public source type using Open Type - Change visibility of the type to default - Open the type again -> Type history displays the type as public, the workspace type match is correctly displayed as default | verified fixed | 95e5acb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T13:02:12Z | 2005-07-04T12:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
102,645 | Bug 102645 [open type] Open Type history shows stale visibility info in type history | 3.1 Steps to reproduce: - Open a public source type using Open Type - Change visibility of the type to default - Open the type again -> Type history displays the type as public, the workspace type match is correctly displayed as default | verified fixed | 95e5acb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T13:02:12Z | 2005-07-04T12:26:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/TypeInfo.java | |
102,645 | Bug 102645 [open type] Open Type history shows stale visibility info in type history | 3.1 Steps to reproduce: - Open a public source type using Open Type - Change visibility of the type to default - Open the type again -> Type history displays the type as public, the workspace type match is correctly displayed as default | verified fixed | 95e5acb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T13:02:12Z | 2005-07-04T12:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
102,645 | Bug 102645 [open type] Open Type history shows stale visibility info in type history | 3.1 Steps to reproduce: - Open a public source type using Open Type - Change visibility of the type to default - Open the type again -> Type history displays the type as public, the workspace type match is correctly displayed as default | verified fixed | 95e5acb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T13:02:12Z | 2005-07-04T12:26:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/TypeInfoHistory.java | |
107,637 | Bug 107637 CopyParticipant needs more detailed information about refactoring destination (Java) | Hi, I'm using a custom CopyParticipant to participate in Java refactorings. With the public API, it's only possible to find out the compilation unit which is the destination (e.g. of a copied method). More precisely, the method CopyArguments.getDestination():Object returns an instance of org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.C... | verified fixed | ea44a36 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T13:12:40Z | 2005-08-22T17:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
107,637 | Bug 107637 CopyParticipant needs more detailed information about refactoring destination (Java) | Hi, I'm using a custom CopyParticipant to participate in Java refactorings. With the public API, it's only possible to find out the compilation unit which is the destination (e.g. of a copied method). More precisely, the method CopyArguments.getDestination():Object returns an instance of org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.C... | verified fixed | ea44a36 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T13:12:40Z | 2005-08-22T17:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java | |
108,666 | Bug 108666 [refactoring] Infer type argument gives strange result | null | verified fixed | 444ab09 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T16:07:20Z | 2005-09-02T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InferTypeArguments/testCuNestedVectors1/out/A.java | package p;
import java.util.Vector;
class A {
void foo() {
Vector v1= new Vector();
Vector v2= new Vector();
v2.add(v1);
v1.add(v2);
}
void bar() {
Vector v3= new Vector();
v3.add(v3);
}
} |
108,666 | Bug 108666 [refactoring] Infer type argument gives strange result | null | verified fixed | 444ab09 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T16:07:20Z | 2005-09-02T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
108,666 | Bug 108666 [refactoring] Infer type argument gives strange result | null | verified fixed | 444ab09 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T16:07:20Z | 2005-09-02T14:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/typesets/SuperTypesOfSingleton.java | |
108,761 | Bug 108761 Deadlock while selecting method in Outline View | Using build I20050830-0800. I was browsing my code in an editor and then while trying to select a method in Outline View, I got following dead-lock showing by VM threads dump: Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_04-b05 mixed mode): "Worker-32" prio=5 tid=0x0435c370 nid=0x1764 in Object.wait() [4f4f000..4... | verified fixed | c4e965f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T16:10:23Z | 2005-09-04T16:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
108,761 | Bug 108761 Deadlock while selecting method in Outline View | Using build I20050830-0800. I was browsing my code in an editor and then while trying to select a method in Outline View, I got following dead-lock showing by VM threads dump: Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_04-b05 mixed mode): "Worker-32" prio=5 tid=0x0435c370 nid=0x1764 in Object.wait() [4f4f000..4... | verified fixed | c4e965f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-07T16:10:23Z | 2005-09-04T16:06:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/SuperTypeHierarchyCache.java | |
109,019 | Bug 109019 [RenameSupport.create] PROBLEM | In a java file, use the JDT API [My Code]: IField field = type.getField("..."); try{ RenameSupport rs = RenameSupport.create(field,"newName",RenameSupport.NONE); rs.openDialog(null); } catch(Exception e){ ... } [My Problem]: "Rename Field" dialog is opened ok.But the "newName" string isn't displayed.The dialog still di... | verified fixed | 05ae618 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-08T13:37:01Z | 2005-09-08T03:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
109,019 | Bug 109019 [RenameSupport.create] PROBLEM | In a java file, use the JDT API [My Code]: IField field = type.getField("..."); try{ RenameSupport rs = RenameSupport.create(field,"newName",RenameSupport.NONE); rs.openDialog(null); } catch(Exception e){ ... } [My Problem]: "Rename Field" dialog is opened ok.But the "newName" string isn't displayed.The dialog still di... | verified fixed | 05ae618 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-08T13:37:01Z | 2005-09-08T03:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/TextInputWizardPage.java | |
109,019 | Bug 109019 [RenameSupport.create] PROBLEM | In a java file, use the JDT API [My Code]: IField field = type.getField("..."); try{ RenameSupport rs = RenameSupport.create(field,"newName",RenameSupport.NONE); rs.openDialog(null); } catch(Exception e){ ... } [My Problem]: "Rename Field" dialog is opened ok.But the "newName" string isn't displayed.The dialog still di... | verified fixed | 05ae618 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-08T13:37:01Z | 2005-09-08T03:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
109,019 | Bug 109019 [RenameSupport.create] PROBLEM | In a java file, use the JDT API [My Code]: IField field = type.getField("..."); try{ RenameSupport rs = RenameSupport.create(field,"newName",RenameSupport.NONE); rs.openDialog(null); } catch(Exception e){ ... } [My Problem]: "Rename Field" dialog is opened ok.But the "newName" string isn't displayed.The dialog still di... | verified fixed | 05ae618 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-08T13:37:01Z | 2005-09-08T03:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/RenameInputWizardPage.java | |
107,110 | Bug 107110 IMethodBinding.isSubsignature not yet correctly implemented | 20050816 HEAD I added a new test 'MethodOverrideTest' to test our implementation of isSubignature but for IMethod. The results are compared the IMethodBinding.isSubsignature, which seems to not correctly implemented yet. In MethodOverrideTest (org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests) turn DEBUG_SHOWRESULTS to true to see the problems... | verified fixed | 5886bbe | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-08T14:01:17Z | 2005-08-16T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/MethodOverrideTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,053 | Bug 109053 Call Hierarchy fails to find calls to binary private method | null | verified fixed | f26fe02 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-08T14:46:48Z | 2005-09-08T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
109,053 | Bug 109053 Call Hierarchy fails to find calls to binary private method | null | verified fixed | f26fe02 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-08T14:46:48Z | 2005-09-08T14:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringScopeFactory.java | |
99,325 | Bug 99325 [syntax highlighting] semantic highlighting broken when using "convert to new for loop" | I20050610-0010 (no regression, though - just exposed by the quick fix) - In the code below, execute the "convert to new for loop" quick fix - undo -> note that the 'for' keyword is wrongly colored. -> subsequent reconciles do not correct the failure -> only doing a major change (cutting and pasting entire method, closi... | verified fixed | 85c8b4f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-09T12:31:26Z | 2005-06-10T10:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/SemanticHighlightingPresenter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
102,629 | Bug 102629 [WorkingSets] Resources like xml files still not saved in the Java WorkingSets | Hi, following problem occurs with Working Sets under Eclipse 3.1: 1. Open Java Perspective 2. Select Package Explorer View 3. Select an Java Working Set which contains files from two projects. 4. Add some resources (e.g xml files) from the second project to the working set. 5. Close the second project 6. Reopen the sec... | verified fixed | 79f3754 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-09T13:52:10Z | 2005-07-04T06:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/workingsets/JavaWorkingSetUpdater.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
65,268 | Bug 65268 [projection] editor is missing collapse all action for code folding | null | verified fixed | cd347ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-09T15:06:38Z | 2004-06-02T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/actions/FoldingActionGroup.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
65,268 | Bug 65268 [projection] editor is missing collapse all action for code folding | null | verified fixed | cd347ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-09T15:06:38Z | 2004-06-02T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,613 | Bug 93613 [package explorer] Inner class org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.packageview.PackageExplorerPart.PackageExplorerProblemTreeViewer has links to its instance in parent | Class org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.packageview.PackageExplorerPart.PackageExplorerProblemTreeViewer is referencing fViewer field from PackageExplorerPart, which is actually instance of PackageExplorerProblemTreeViewer class. Should be methods getFilters() and getContentProvider() called directly and in method filter() "... | verified fixed | 3d35596 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-10T17:19:56Z | 2005-05-04T04:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
103,078 | Bug 103078 NPE during Java drag and drop | From time to time, when I drag and drop a Java file into a package in the Java perspective, I get the following exception and a dialog that an error has occurred. !ENTRY org.eclipse.jdt.ui 4 2 2005-07-07 16:33:08.671 !MESSAGE Problems occurred when invoking code from plug- in: "org.eclipse.jdt.ui". !STACK 0 java.lang.N... | verified fixed | 0385ac9 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-11T10:40:56Z | 2005-07-07T21:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/FileTransferDropAdapter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
104,944 | Bug 104944 [JUnit] Unnecessary code in JUnitProgressBar | Unnecessary code in JUnitProgressBar. | verified fixed | 90c722c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-11T11:05:48Z | 2005-07-24T15:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/JUnitProgressBar.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,478 | Bug 108478 [formatter] Add FORMATTER_ALIGNMENT_FOR_ASSIGNMENT support in the code formatter preference page | null | verified fixed | ce4c385 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-13T12:58:28Z | 2005-08-31T14:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/FormatterMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,478 | Bug 108478 [formatter] Add FORMATTER_ALIGNMENT_FOR_ASSIGNMENT support in the code formatter preference page | null | verified fixed | ce4c385 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-13T12:58:28Z | 2005-08-31T14:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/LineWrappingTabPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
106,174 | Bug 106174 Infer type arguments fails on junit.framework | I20050803 + ZRH export of 0805 - import junit381 as source - select the package junit.framework in the pkg explorer | verified fixed | f78ae3b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-14T12:07:34Z | 2005-08-05T16:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InferTypeArguments/testCuGetSuperclass/in/A.java | |
106,174 | Bug 106174 Infer type arguments fails on junit.framework | I20050803 + ZRH export of 0805 - import junit381 as source - select the package junit.framework in the pkg explorer | verified fixed | f78ae3b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-14T12:07:34Z | 2005-08-05T16:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InferTypeArguments/testCuGetSuperclass/out/A.java | |
106,174 | Bug 106174 Infer type arguments fails on junit.framework | I20050803 + ZRH export of 0805 - import junit381 as source - select the package junit.framework in the pkg explorer | verified fixed | f78ae3b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-14T12:07:34Z | 2005-08-05T16:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
106,174 | Bug 106174 Infer type arguments fails on junit.framework | I20050803 + ZRH export of 0805 - import junit381 as source - select the package junit.framework in the pkg explorer | verified fixed | f78ae3b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-14T12:07:34Z | 2005-08-05T16:40:00Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/InferTypeArgumentsTests.java | |
106,174 | Bug 106174 Infer type arguments fails on junit.framework | I20050803 + ZRH export of 0805 - import junit381 as source - select the package junit.framework in the pkg explorer | verified fixed | f78ae3b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-14T12:07:34Z | 2005-08-05T16:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
106,174 | Bug 106174 Infer type arguments fails on junit.framework | I20050803 + ZRH export of 0805 - import junit381 as source - select the package junit.framework in the pkg explorer | verified fixed | f78ae3b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-14T12:07:34Z | 2005-08-05T16:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/generics/InferTypeArgumentsConstraintsSolver.java | |
106,174 | Bug 106174 Infer type arguments fails on junit.framework | I20050803 + ZRH export of 0805 - import junit381 as source - select the package junit.framework in the pkg explorer | verified fixed | f78ae3b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-14T12:07:34Z | 2005-08-05T16:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
106,174 | Bug 106174 Infer type arguments fails on junit.framework | I20050803 + ZRH export of 0805 - import junit381 as source - select the package junit.framework in the pkg explorer | verified fixed | f78ae3b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-14T12:07:34Z | 2005-08-05T16:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/generics/InferTypeArgumentsTCModel.java | |
108,700 | Bug 108700 [typing] Automatically close parenthesis does not work when content assist popup is up | null | verified fixed | 67ad691 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-15T15:24:06Z | 2005-09-02T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/GenericJavaTypeProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,700 | Bug 108700 [typing] Automatically close parenthesis does not work when content assist popup is up | null | verified fixed | 67ad691 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-15T15:24:06Z | 2005-09-02T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/JavaMethodCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and is a... |
108,700 | Bug 108700 [typing] Automatically close parenthesis does not work when content assist popup is up | null | verified fixed | 67ad691 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-15T15:24:06Z | 2005-09-02T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/LazyJavaCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,700 | Bug 108700 [typing] Automatically close parenthesis does not work when content assist popup is up | null | verified fixed | 67ad691 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-15T15:24:06Z | 2005-09-02T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/LazyJavaTypeCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,453 | Bug 108453 [quick fix] @SuppressWarnings("nls") on static initializer causes error | If you have static block with non-externalised strings and you add "SuppressWarning" quick fix to the block, jdt compiler reports error on the static key word saying "Syntax error, insert "enum Identifier" to complete EnumHeader" Cheers | verified fixed | 99711f4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-15T16:24:34Z | 2005-08-31T06:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/LocalCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,453 | Bug 108453 [quick fix] @SuppressWarnings("nls") on static initializer causes error | If you have static block with non-externalised strings and you add "SuppressWarning" quick fix to the block, jdt compiler reports error on the static key word saying "Syntax error, insert "enum Identifier" to complete EnumHeader" Cheers | verified fixed | 99711f4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-15T16:24:34Z | 2005-08-31T06:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/ModifierCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,453 | Bug 108453 [quick fix] @SuppressWarnings("nls") on static initializer causes error | If you have static block with non-externalised strings and you add "SuppressWarning" quick fix to the block, jdt compiler reports error on the static key word saying "Syntax error, insert "enum Identifier" to complete EnumHeader" Cheers | verified fixed | 99711f4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-15T16:24:34Z | 2005-08-31T06:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/QuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,453 | Bug 108453 [quick fix] @SuppressWarnings("nls") on static initializer causes error | If you have static block with non-externalised strings and you add "SuppressWarning" quick fix to the block, jdt compiler reports error on the static key word saying "Syntax error, insert "enum Identifier" to complete EnumHeader" Cheers | verified fixed | 99711f4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-15T16:24:34Z | 2005-08-31T06:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/LocalCorrectionsSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,453 | Bug 108453 [quick fix] @SuppressWarnings("nls") on static initializer causes error | If you have static block with non-externalised strings and you add "SuppressWarning" quick fix to the block, jdt compiler reports error on the static key word saying "Syntax error, insert "enum Identifier" to complete EnumHeader" Cheers | verified fixed | 99711f4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-15T16:24:34Z | 2005-08-31T06:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ModifierCorrectionSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
32,088 | Bug 32088 Inconsistent terminology for content assist | The keybinding entry for "content assist" is labeled content assist. The TabItem under Java->Editor preference page is labeled "code assist". besides the inconsistency, I thought the name "code assist" was already taken by a competitor's product. | verified fixed | 30cf758 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-16T08:21:24Z | 2003-02-18T01:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CodeAssistConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
32,088 | Bug 32088 Inconsistent terminology for content assist | The keybinding entry for "content assist" is labeled content assist. The TabItem under Java->Editor preference page is labeled "code assist". besides the inconsistency, I thought the name "code assist" was already taken by a competitor's product. | verified fixed | 30cf758 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-16T08:21:24Z | 2003-02-18T01:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CodeAssistPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,419 | Bug 109419 hierarchical package rename should remember state | I20050906 + HEAD of 0913 - hierarchically rename a package - open the rename package dialog again Expected: hierarchical checkbox remembers last selection Actual: checkbox is always off | verified fixed | ac1a9d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-16T14:37:28Z | 2005-09-13T16:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
109,419 | Bug 109419 hierarchical package rename should remember state | I20050906 + HEAD of 0913 - hierarchically rename a package - open the rename package dialog again Expected: hierarchical checkbox remembers last selection Actual: checkbox is always off | verified fixed | ac1a9d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-16T14:37:28Z | 2005-09-13T16:46:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/RenameInputWizardPage.java | |
109,419 | Bug 109419 hierarchical package rename should remember state | I20050906 + HEAD of 0913 - hierarchically rename a package - open the rename package dialog again Expected: hierarchical checkbox remembers last selection Actual: checkbox is always off | verified fixed | ac1a9d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-16T14:37:28Z | 2005-09-13T16:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
109,419 | Bug 109419 hierarchical package rename should remember state | I20050906 + HEAD of 0913 - hierarchically rename a package - open the rename package dialog again Expected: hierarchical checkbox remembers last selection Actual: checkbox is always off | verified fixed | ac1a9d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-16T14:37:28Z | 2005-09-13T16:46:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/RenamePackageWizard.java | |
107,026 | Bug 107026 [1.5][refactoring] NPE in ExtractMethodInputPage with enum's | null | verified fixed | 44d50ed | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-19T09:28:44Z | 2005-08-15T15:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
107,026 | Bug 107026 [1.5][refactoring] NPE in ExtractMethodInputPage with enum's | null | verified fixed | 44d50ed | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-19T09:28:44Z | 2005-08-15T15:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/code/ExtractMethodInputPage.java | |
109,513 | Bug 109513 Project Specific Code Templates are not persisted across sessions | I tried changing the Code templates for a project. I enabled "Project Specific Settings" and changed the method template. It worked for that session, but if I closed Eclipse and opened it again the settings were restored to Workspace settings. I would of expected the project specific settings to be stored in the .setti... | verified fixed | 2e3caa0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-19T16:50:21Z | 2005-09-14T15:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/viewsupport/ProjectTemplateStore.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
110,003 | Bug 110003 [content assist] Strange cycling behaviour | 20050920 - Go to the keys preference page and configure Ctrl + Shift + Space to 'Specific Content Assist (type: Template proposals)', change the normal Content Assist from Ctrl + Space to somthing else - in the Java editor type for and press Ctrl + Shift + Space - templates show up The dialog reads: Press 'Ctrl + Space... | verified fixed | f486c2c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-21T10:18:21Z | 2005-09-20T12:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/CompilationUnitEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,969 | Bug 109969 error while computing quick fixes: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.FieldAccess | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050920-0010 Setting the cursor to any position on the line: this.bar= bar; in package pack11; public class Test1 { int bar; public void foo() { this.bar= bar; } } and then call quick fix (ctrl-1) I get following exception: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.FieldAccess at... | verified fixed | 411343e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-21T10:34:00Z | 2005-09-20T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/LocalCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,969 | Bug 109969 error while computing quick fixes: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.FieldAccess | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050920-0010 Setting the cursor to any position on the line: this.bar= bar; in package pack11; public class Test1 { int bar; public void foo() { this.bar= bar; } } and then call quick fix (ctrl-1) I get following exception: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.FieldAccess at... | verified fixed | 411343e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-21T10:34:00Z | 2005-09-20T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/LocalCorrectionsSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,992 | Bug 109992 Remove $NON-NLS$ tag quick fix can result in compile error | I20050920-0010 Users might not be aware of the exact non-nls tag syntax and hence add some additional comments behind the tag, e.g.: <some code> //$NON-NLS-1$ some additionaal user comment The quick fix results in: <some code> some additionaal user comment | verified fixed | f6187af | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-21T13:06:35Z | 2005-09-20T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/LocalCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,992 | Bug 109992 Remove $NON-NLS$ tag quick fix can result in compile error | I20050920-0010 Users might not be aware of the exact non-nls tag syntax and hence add some additional comments behind the tag, e.g.: <some code> //$NON-NLS-1$ some additionaal user comment The quick fix results in: <some code> some additionaal user comment | verified fixed | f6187af | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-21T13:06:35Z | 2005-09-20T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/LocalCorrectionsSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test42/in/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test42/in/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test42/out/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test42/out/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test43/in/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test43/in/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test43/out/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test43/out/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test44/in/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test44/in/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test44/out/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test44/out/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test45/in/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test45/in/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test45/out/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test45/out/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test46/in/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test46/in/B.java |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.