issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/ModifyDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/ProfileManager.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/ProfileStore.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/ProfileVersioner.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/RenameProfileDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
110,149 | Bug 110149 Auto completion does not always work in Move Static Members dialog box | Build ID: I20050921-0010. Select Move on a static method. Type (only one) package, type ., press Ctrl+Space. Now select a class and press Enter. Expected: The class appears behind the dot Actual: Nothing happens Note that it works correctly for package completion and if more than one package is used. | verified fixed | 0fe61e0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T16:31:23Z | 2005-09-21T10:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
110,149 | Bug 110149 Auto completion does not always work in Move Static Members dialog box | Build ID: I20050921-0010. Select Move on a static method. Type (only one) package, type ., press Ctrl+Space. Now select a class and press Enter. Expected: The class appears behind the dot Actual: Nothing happens Note that it works correctly for package completion and if more than one package is used. | verified fixed | 0fe61e0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T16:31:23Z | 2005-09-21T10:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/MoveMembersWizard.java | |
110,149 | Bug 110149 Auto completion does not always work in Move Static Members dialog box | Build ID: I20050921-0010. Select Move on a static method. Type (only one) package, type ., press Ctrl+Space. Now select a class and press Enter. Expected: The class appears behind the dot Actual: Nothing happens Note that it works correctly for package completion and if more than one package is used. | verified fixed | 0fe61e0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T16:31:23Z | 2005-09-21T10:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
110,149 | Bug 110149 Auto completion does not always work in Move Static Members dialog box | Build ID: I20050921-0010. Select Move on a static method. Type (only one) package, type ., press Ctrl+Space. Now select a class and press Enter. Expected: The class appears behind the dot Actual: Nothing happens Note that it works correctly for package completion and if more than one package is used. | verified fixed | 0fe61e0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T16:31:23Z | 2005-09-21T10:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/contentassist/CUPositionCompletionProcessor.java | |
110,149 | Bug 110149 Auto completion does not always work in Move Static Members dialog box | Build ID: I20050921-0010. Select Move on a static method. Type (only one) package, type ., press Ctrl+Space. Now select a class and press Enter. Expected: The class appears behind the dot Actual: Nothing happens Note that it works correctly for package completion and if more than one package is used. | verified fixed | 0fe61e0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T16:31:23Z | 2005-09-21T10:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
110,149 | Bug 110149 Auto completion does not always work in Move Static Members dialog box | Build ID: I20050921-0010. Select Move on a static method. Type (only one) package, type ., press Ctrl+Space. Now select a class and press Enter. Expected: The class appears behind the dot Actual: Nothing happens Note that it works correctly for package completion and if more than one package is used. | verified fixed | 0fe61e0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T16:31:23Z | 2005-09-21T10:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/contentassist/JavaTypeCompletionProcessor.java | |
105,926 | Bug 105926 [Formatter] Exporting Unnamed profile fails silently | When attempting to export an "Unnamed Profile" from the Project Preferences > Java Code Style > Formatter it will fail silently when it gets to ProfileStore.writeProfilesToStream(): for(final Iterator iter= profiles.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) { final Profile profile= (Profile)iter.next(); if (profile.isProfileToSave(... | verified fixed | 03b755d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T17:45:51Z | 2005-08-03T14:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/CodeFormatterConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
100,760 | Bug 100760 [formatter] Project specific formatter dialog shows wrong default profile | RC3 - create a new workspace global formatter profile - make it the default - create a project - open project specific formatter properties observe: the disabled protion of the dialog shows that the default profile is a built in profile. IMO this is wrong. | verified fixed | ec830dd | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-07T07:31:14Z | 2005-06-20T09:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/ProfileManager.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
63,838 | Bug 63838 [misc] highlight control statement when break/continue selected [mark occurrences] | 3.0m9 it's pretty confusing sometimes what a 'continue' or 'break' refers to. it would be cool to have the control statement highlighted when i select the 'continue' or 'break'. it'd also take labels into account. | verified fixed | 7290b9d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-07T15:54:24Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests/src/org/eclipse/jdt/text/tests/BreakContinueTargetFinderTest.java | |
63,838 | Bug 63838 [misc] highlight control statement when break/continue selected [mark occurrences] | 3.0m9 it's pretty confusing sometimes what a 'continue' or 'break' refers to. it would be cool to have the control statement highlighted when i select the 'continue' or 'break'. it'd also take labels into account. | verified fixed | 7290b9d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-07T15:54:24Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests/src/org/eclipse/jdt/text/tests/JdtTextTestSuite.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
63,838 | Bug 63838 [misc] highlight control statement when break/continue selected [mark occurrences] | 3.0m9 it's pretty confusing sometimes what a 'continue' or 'break' refers to. it would be cool to have the control statement highlighted when i select the 'continue' or 'break'. it'd also take labels into account. | verified fixed | 7290b9d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-07T15:54:24Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
63,838 | Bug 63838 [misc] highlight control statement when break/continue selected [mark occurrences] | 3.0m9 it's pretty confusing sometimes what a 'continue' or 'break' refers to. it would be cool to have the control statement highlighted when i select the 'continue' or 'break'. it'd also take labels into account. | verified fixed | 7290b9d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-07T15:54:24Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/MarkOccurrencesConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
63,838 | Bug 63838 [misc] highlight control statement when break/continue selected [mark occurrences] | 3.0m9 it's pretty confusing sometimes what a 'continue' or 'break' refers to. it would be cool to have the control statement highlighted when i select the 'continue' or 'break'. it'd also take labels into account. | verified fixed | 7290b9d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-07T15:54:24Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/PreferencesMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
63,838 | Bug 63838 [misc] highlight control statement when break/continue selected [mark occurrences] | 3.0m9 it's pretty confusing sometimes what a 'continue' or 'break' refers to. it would be cool to have the control statement highlighted when i select the 'continue' or 'break'. it'd also take labels into account. | verified fixed | 7290b9d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-07T15:54:24Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/BreakContinueTargetFinder.java | |
63,838 | Bug 63838 [misc] highlight control statement when break/continue selected [mark occurrences] | 3.0m9 it's pretty confusing sometimes what a 'continue' or 'break' refers to. it would be cool to have the control statement highlighted when i select the 'continue' or 'break'. it'd also take labels into account. | verified fixed | 7290b9d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-07T15:54:24Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/SearchMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
63,838 | Bug 63838 [misc] highlight control statement when break/continue selected [mark occurrences] | 3.0m9 it's pretty confusing sometimes what a 'continue' or 'break' refers to. it would be cool to have the control statement highlighted when i select the 'continue' or 'break'. it'd also take labels into account. | verified fixed | 7290b9d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-07T15:54:24Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/PreferenceConstants.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,139 | Bug 111139 Add FORMATTER_INSERT_SPACE_BEFORE_PARENTHESIZED_EXPRESSION_IN_RETURN to the code formatter preference page | This new option should be added in the whitespace section (control statements) of the code formatter preference page. It makes the insertion of a space after the return keyword optional when the following expression is a cast expression, a parenthesized expression, a string literal or prefix expression. For all other t... | verified fixed | 43a5ce5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T08:11:08Z | 2005-09-29T21:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/FormatterMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,139 | Bug 111139 Add FORMATTER_INSERT_SPACE_BEFORE_PARENTHESIZED_EXPRESSION_IN_RETURN to the code formatter preference page | This new option should be added in the whitespace section (control statements) of the code formatter preference page. It makes the insertion of a space after the return keyword optional when the following expression is a cast expression, a parenthesized expression, a string literal or prefix expression. For all other t... | verified fixed | 43a5ce5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T08:11:08Z | 2005-09-29T21:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/WhiteSpaceOptions.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
97,918 | Bug 97918 [formatter] tab policy and indentation policy: indent on column | I would like a smarter tab policy. In code formated like this: class Example { Example(int arg1, int arg2, int arg3, int arg4, int arg5, int arg6) { this(); } Example() { } } I would like to have a mix of tabs and spaces like this: class Example { <tb>Example(int arg1, int arg2, <tb> int arg3, int arg4, <tb> int arg5, ... | verified fixed | ace5d69 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T08:14:14Z | 2005-06-01T18:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/IndentationTabPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,453 | Bug 111453 [preferences] Improve preview of enum constant formatting | null | verified fixed | 8d3f133 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T08:18:44Z | 2005-10-04T15:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/LineWrappingTabPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
99,698 | Bug 99698 [formatter] Code formatter > Braces: no preview for 'Annotation Type Declaration' | I20050610-1757 (3.1RC2) Code formatter > Braces: there's no preview for 'Annotation Type Declaration'. | verified fixed | 98f29e9 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T08:28:54Z | 2005-06-13T16:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/BracesTabPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
110,438 | Bug 110438 [quick assist] surround with runnable: bug with control statement bodies | 20050925 Surround the body ('g.drawImage(...)') of the if-statement: class E { public void paint(Graphics g) { if (g != null) g.drawImage(null, 0, 0, 0, 0, null); } } -> Use ASTNodes.isControlStatementBody to detect if a block has to be introduced for a statement. java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Node does not exist... | verified fixed | 804c9ce | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T08:38:07Z | 2005-09-23T12:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/AssistQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
110,438 | Bug 110438 [quick assist] surround with runnable: bug with control statement bodies | 20050925 Surround the body ('g.drawImage(...)') of the if-statement: class E { public void paint(Graphics g) { if (g != null) g.drawImage(null, 0, 0, 0, 0, null); } } -> Use ASTNodes.isControlStatementBody to detect if a block has to be introduced for a statement. java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Node does not exist... | verified fixed | 804c9ce | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T08:38:07Z | 2005-09-23T12:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SurroundWithRunnableProposal.java | package org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.correction;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import org.eclipse.core.runtime.CoreException;
import org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Image;
import org.eclipse.jdt.core.JavaModelException;
import org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AST;
import org.ecl... |
111,414 | Bug 111414 Open Type dialog: 'Fully Qualify Duplicates' does not work as expected | I20050928-1300 The menu 'Fully Qualify Duplicates' in the Open Type dialog does not affect the qualification (which is always on for duplicates) but actually appends the container info. | verified fixed | 19464db | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T13:01:13Z | 2005-10-04T10:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/TypeSelectionComponent.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,414 | Bug 111414 Open Type dialog: 'Fully Qualify Duplicates' does not work as expected | I20050928-1300 The menu 'Fully Qualify Duplicates' in the Open Type dialog does not affect the qualification (which is always on for duplicates) but actually appends the container info. | verified fixed | 19464db | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T13:01:13Z | 2005-10-04T10:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/TypeSelectionDialog2.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,197 | Bug 112197 [quick fix] "Add @SuppressWarnings 'unchecked' to 'foo()'" appears twice | null | verified fixed | 9d0d1bb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T15:15:23Z | 2005-10-11T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/ModifierCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,197 | Bug 112197 [quick fix] "Add @SuppressWarnings 'unchecked' to 'foo()'" appears twice | null | verified fixed | 9d0d1bb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-11T15:15:23Z | 2005-10-11T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ModifierCorrectionSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,234 | Bug 112234 NewContainerWizardPage.getCurrentTextSelection javadoc wording | "Returns the test selection..." should be "Returns the text selection..." This occurs in the method description and the @return doclet. | verified fixed | 7804c59 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-12T08:03:51Z | 2005-10-11T17:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewContainerWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,217 | Bug 112217 [implementation] Deadlock in ASTProvider.getAST | Eclipse 3.2M2 + Mylar for 3.2 0.3.11 I tried to copy and paste some code in the Java editor and Eclipse locked up. I managed to get a stack trace which is pasted below. Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0_02-b09 mixed mode, sharing): "Text Viewer Hover Presenter" daemon prio=2 tid=0x0305cd30 nid=0x5b4 in... | verified fixed | 0c7d72e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-12T11:26:14Z | 2005-10-11T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/ASTProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,586 | Bug 112586 [api] add support for toggling folding for IJavaElement's | For tools that want to use the IJavaFoldingStructureProviderExtension, but want finer-grained control of what to collapse, it would be useful to have the following methods: - collapseElements(List<IJavaElement> elements) - expandElements(List<IJavaElement> elements) My use case is Mylar, which currently needs to set it... | verified fixed | 8015fd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T10:03:50Z | 2005-10-14T03:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/folding/DefaultJavaFoldingStructureProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,586 | Bug 112586 [api] add support for toggling folding for IJavaElement's | For tools that want to use the IJavaFoldingStructureProviderExtension, but want finer-grained control of what to collapse, it would be useful to have the following methods: - collapseElements(List<IJavaElement> elements) - expandElements(List<IJavaElement> elements) My use case is Mylar, which currently needs to set it... | verified fixed | 8015fd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T10:03:50Z | 2005-10-14T03:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/text/folding/IJavaFoldingStructureProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,586 | Bug 112586 [api] add support for toggling folding for IJavaElement's | For tools that want to use the IJavaFoldingStructureProviderExtension, but want finer-grained control of what to collapse, it would be useful to have the following methods: - collapseElements(List<IJavaElement> elements) - expandElements(List<IJavaElement> elements) My use case is Mylar, which currently needs to set it... | verified fixed | 8015fd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T10:03:50Z | 2005-10-14T03:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/text/folding/IJavaFoldingStructureProviderExtension.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,462 | Bug 112462 wrong ordering of specifiers (annotations) after refactoring overriding method | After refactoring a method to make it protected, the @Override annotation in inheriting methods gets placed _after_ the protected keyword, instead of above it, as is done nicely when using the quickfix `Add unimplemented methods' | verified fixed | edd8225 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T12:35:47Z | 2005-10-13T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAll63_in.java | |
112,462 | Bug 112462 wrong ordering of specifiers (annotations) after refactoring overriding method | After refactoring a method to make it protected, the @Override annotation in inheriting methods gets placed _after_ the protected keyword, instead of above it, as is done nicely when using the quickfix `Add unimplemented methods' | verified fixed | edd8225 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T12:35:47Z | 2005-10-13T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAll63_out.java | |
112,462 | Bug 112462 wrong ordering of specifiers (annotations) after refactoring overriding method | After refactoring a method to make it protected, the @Override annotation in inheriting methods gets placed _after_ the protected keyword, instead of above it, as is done nicely when using the quickfix `Add unimplemented methods' | verified fixed | edd8225 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T12:35:47Z | 2005-10-13T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/Annotation1.java | package p;
public class Annotation1_in {
public void foo() {
Cell1 c= Cell1.createCell1();
}
}
@interface Preliminary { }
class Cell1 {
public static Cell1 createCell1() {
return new Cell1();
}
private @Preliminary /*[*/Cell1/*]*/() { }
}
|
112,462 | Bug 112462 wrong ordering of specifiers (annotations) after refactoring overriding method | After refactoring a method to make it protected, the @Override annotation in inheriting methods gets placed _after_ the protected keyword, instead of above it, as is done nicely when using the quickfix `Add unimplemented methods' | verified fixed | edd8225 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T12:35:47Z | 2005-10-13T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/Annotation2.java | package p;
public class Annotation2_in {
public void foo() {
Cell2 c= Cell2.createCell2();
}
}
@interface Buggy {
String value();
}
class Cell2 {
public static Cell2 createCell2() {
return new Cell2();
}
private @Buggy("doesn't work") /*[*/Cell2/*]*/() { }
}
|
112,462 | Bug 112462 wrong ordering of specifiers (annotations) after refactoring overriding method | After refactoring a method to make it protected, the @Override annotation in inheriting methods gets placed _after_ the protected keyword, instead of above it, as is done nicely when using the quickfix `Add unimplemented methods' | verified fixed | edd8225 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T12:35:47Z | 2005-10-13T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/Annotation3.java | package p;
public class Annotation3_in {
public void foo() {
Cell3 c= Cell3.createCell3();
}
}
@interface Authorship {
String name();
String purpose();
}
class Cell3 {
public static Cell3 createCell3() {
return new Cell3();
}
private @Authorship(
name="Rene Descartes",
purpose="None whatsoever") /*[*/C... |
112,462 | Bug 112462 wrong ordering of specifiers (annotations) after refactoring overriding method | After refactoring a method to make it protected, the @Override annotation in inheriting methods gets placed _after_ the protected keyword, instead of above it, as is done nicely when using the quickfix `Add unimplemented methods' | verified fixed | edd8225 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T12:35:47Z | 2005-10-13T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
112,462 | Bug 112462 wrong ordering of specifiers (annotations) after refactoring overriding method | After refactoring a method to make it protected, the @Override annotation in inheriting methods gets placed _after_ the protected keyword, instead of above it, as is done nicely when using the quickfix `Add unimplemented methods' | verified fixed | edd8225 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T12:35:47Z | 2005-10-13T13:26:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ChangeSignatureTests.java | |
112,462 | Bug 112462 wrong ordering of specifiers (annotations) after refactoring overriding method | After refactoring a method to make it protected, the @Override annotation in inheriting methods gets placed _after_ the protected keyword, instead of above it, as is done nicely when using the quickfix `Add unimplemented methods' | verified fixed | edd8225 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T12:35:47Z | 2005-10-13T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
112,462 | Bug 112462 wrong ordering of specifiers (annotations) after refactoring overriding method | After refactoring a method to make it protected, the @Override annotation in inheriting methods gets placed _after_ the protected keyword, instead of above it, as is done nicely when using the quickfix `Add unimplemented methods' | verified fixed | edd8225 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T12:35:47Z | 2005-10-13T13:26:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ModifierRewrite.java | |
112,436 | Bug 112436 [search] is unkind to its participants | PDE is on its way to becoming a Java-seach-participant to show hits in manifest files. It's all going swimmingly, except that annotations are not being created when the manifest editor opens. The problem seems to be in JavaSearchResult#computeContainedMatches(...). This method returns an empty array if the file being o... | verified fixed | 6e9c3dc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-14T14:45:06Z | 2005-10-13T07:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchResult.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
63,840 | Bug 63840 warning on unused labels | we have warnings for all sorts of unused things. one for unused labels would be good too. | verified fixed | 281f6f8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-17T08:36:42Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/PreferencesMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
63,840 | Bug 63840 warning on unused labels | we have warnings for all sorts of unused things. one for unused labels would be good too. | verified fixed | 281f6f8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-17T08:36:42Z | 2004-05-25T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/ProblemSeveritiesConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,886 | Bug 112886 [nls tooling] Configuring accessor class toggles off "Use Eclipse's..." setting | I20051004-0800 On a file that has never been externalized. Source>Externalize Strings... Toggle on "Use Eclipse's string externalization mechanism" Click Configure... Make changes to accessor class On return to the externalization wizard, "Use Eclipse's string externalization mechanism" is toggle off. | verified fixed | 57a1b98 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-18T07:16:03Z | 2005-10-17T23:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
112,886 | Bug 112886 [nls tooling] Configuring accessor class toggles off "Use Eclipse's..." setting | I20051004-0800 On a file that has never been externalized. Source>Externalize Strings... Toggle on "Use Eclipse's string externalization mechanism" Click Configure... Make changes to accessor class On return to the externalization wizard, "Use Eclipse's string externalization mechanism" is toggle off. | verified fixed | 57a1b98 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-18T07:16:03Z | 2005-10-17T23:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/nls/NLSRefactoring.java | |
112,076 | Bug 112076 Moving method from anonymous inner type throws InvocationTargetException | In M2: Given code: import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Collections; import java.util.Comparator; public class TestKindRegistry { public class TestKind { public String getPrecededKindIds() { return null; } public String getId() { return null; } } public ArrayList getAllKinds() { ArrayList items = new ArrayList(... | verified fixed | abdc69e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-18T16:52:37Z | 2005-10-10T02:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
112,076 | Bug 112076 Moving method from anonymous inner type throws InvocationTargetException | In M2: Given code: import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Collections; import java.util.Comparator; public class TestKindRegistry { public class TestKind { public String getPrecededKindIds() { return null; } public String getId() { return null; } } public ArrayList getAllKinds() { ArrayList items = new ArrayList(... | verified fixed | abdc69e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-18T16:52:37Z | 2005-10-10T02:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveInstanceMethodProcessor.java | |
112,440 | Bug 112440 Generate Delegate Methods does not work in anonymous types | Build ID: I20051011-1655 When selecting "Generate Delegate Methods" for an anonymous type, the refactoring does not use the fields of the anonymous type, but of the enclosing type as a reference (1). When inserting methods (from fields of the enclosing type) at the current position, it fails without an error message (2... | verified fixed | eea6276 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T09:35:06Z | 2005-10-13T07:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/AddDelegateMethodsAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,077 | Bug 112077 Moving method referenced from inner type introduces compile errors | In M2: Given code: public class TestKindRegistry { public class TestKind { public String getPrecededKindIds() { return null; } public String getId() { return null; } } public ArrayList getAllKinds() { ArrayList items = new ArrayList(); Collections.sort(items, new Comparator() { public int compare(Object arg0, Object ar... | verified fixed | 8bf8a0c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T10:54:35Z | 2005-10-10T02:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
112,077 | Bug 112077 Moving method referenced from inner type introduces compile errors | In M2: Given code: public class TestKindRegistry { public class TestKind { public String getPrecededKindIds() { return null; } public String getId() { return null; } } public ArrayList getAllKinds() { ArrayList items = new ArrayList(); Collections.sort(items, new Comparator() { public int compare(Object arg0, Object ar... | verified fixed | 8bf8a0c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T10:54:35Z | 2005-10-10T02:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveInstanceMethodProcessor.java | |
113,062 | Bug 113062 [code manipulation] Generate constructor using fields throws exception when invoked in anonymous type | Build id: N20051014-0010 When invoking "generate constructor using field" in an anonymous type, the execution fails with an InvocationTargetException. As anonymous types may not have explicitly declared constructors, the source action should display an error message. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.e... | verified fixed | 4a2832a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T14:04:32Z | 2005-10-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
113,062 | Bug 113062 [code manipulation] Generate constructor using fields throws exception when invoked in anonymous type | Build id: N20051014-0010 When invoking "generate constructor using field" in an anonymous type, the execution fails with an InvocationTargetException. As anonymous types may not have explicitly declared constructors, the source action should display an error message. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.e... | verified fixed | 4a2832a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T14:04:32Z | 2005-10-19T11:06:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ASTNodes.java | |
113,062 | Bug 113062 [code manipulation] Generate constructor using fields throws exception when invoked in anonymous type | Build id: N20051014-0010 When invoking "generate constructor using field" in an anonymous type, the execution fails with an InvocationTargetException. As anonymous types may not have explicitly declared constructors, the source action should display an error message. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.e... | verified fixed | 4a2832a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T14:04:32Z | 2005-10-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/actions/ActionMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
113,062 | Bug 113062 [code manipulation] Generate constructor using fields throws exception when invoked in anonymous type | Build id: N20051014-0010 When invoking "generate constructor using field" in an anonymous type, the execution fails with an InvocationTargetException. As anonymous types may not have explicitly declared constructors, the source action should display an error message. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.e... | verified fixed | 4a2832a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T14:04:32Z | 2005-10-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/actions/GenerateConstructorUsingFieldsContentProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
113,062 | Bug 113062 [code manipulation] Generate constructor using fields throws exception when invoked in anonymous type | Build id: N20051014-0010 When invoking "generate constructor using field" in an anonymous type, the execution fails with an InvocationTargetException. As anonymous types may not have explicitly declared constructors, the source action should display an error message. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.e... | verified fixed | 4a2832a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T14:04:32Z | 2005-10-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/GenerateNewConstructorUsingFieldsAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
113,091 | Bug 113091 [code manipulation] Generate constructor using should not use code body templates | As the constructor is ready-for-use after creation, TODOs and other additional strings from the code templates should not be inserted. This would also render the source actions more coherent (create delegate method and getter/setter generation do not use templates too). | verified fixed | c68198e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T14:54:49Z | 2005-10-19T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/source/GenerateConstructorUsingFieldsTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
113,091 | Bug 113091 [code manipulation] Generate constructor using should not use code body templates | As the constructor is ready-for-use after creation, TODOs and other additional strings from the code templates should not be inserted. This would also render the source actions more coherent (create delegate method and getter/setter generation do not use templates too). | verified fixed | c68198e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T14:54:49Z | 2005-10-19T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
113,091 | Bug 113091 [code manipulation] Generate constructor using should not use code body templates | As the constructor is ready-for-use after creation, TODOs and other additional strings from the code templates should not be inserted. This would also render the source actions more coherent (create delegate method and getter/setter generation do not use templates too). | verified fixed | c68198e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T14:54:49Z | 2005-10-19T13:53:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/StubUtility2.java | |
106,637 | Bug 106637 [quick fix] "Change method..." QuickFix loses final keyword. | If the "Change method..." QuickFix is applied, then the final keyword is lost. -------------------------- Bug.java ------------------ import java.util.*; class Bug { void foo(final HashMap map){} {foo(Collections.EMPTY_MAP);} } | verified fixed | 4073507 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T15:43:48Z | 2005-08-10T16:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/UnresolvedMethodsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
106,637 | Bug 106637 [quick fix] "Change method..." QuickFix loses final keyword. | If the "Change method..." QuickFix is applied, then the final keyword is lost. -------------------------- Bug.java ------------------ import java.util.*; class Bug { void foo(final HashMap map){} {foo(Collections.EMPTY_MAP);} } | verified fixed | 4073507 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T15:43:48Z | 2005-08-10T16:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ChangeMethodSignatureProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
106,329 | Bug 106329 [refactoring] Pull Up fails with method type variable of the same name as class type variable | I20050803-0800 - pull up countItem(..) to Collector -> compile errors, since references to method type variable T have been replaced by E - remove 'static' modifier from countItem(..) and pull up again -> no compile error, but changed semantics because the method parameter types don't use the method type variable any m... | verified fixed | d3efbbb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:10:20Z | 2005-08-08T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
106,329 | Bug 106329 [refactoring] Pull Up fails with method type variable of the same name as class type variable | I20050803-0800 - pull up countItem(..) to Collector -> compile errors, since references to method type variable T have been replaced by E - remove 'static' modifier from countItem(..) and pull up again -> no compile error, but changed semantics because the method parameter types don't use the method type variable any m... | verified fixed | d3efbbb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:10:20Z | 2005-08-08T11:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/HierarchyRefactoring.java | |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test1/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A{
public abstract void m();
}
class B extends A{
public void m() {}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test19/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A{
public abstract void f();
public abstract void m();
}
abstract class B extends A{
public void m() {}
public abstract void f();
}
class C extends A{
public void f(){}
public void m() {}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test20/out/B.java | package p;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
class B extends A{
public Collection i;
public List f() {
return null;
}
public Set m() {
return null;
}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test25/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A {
private int bar() {
return foo();
}
public abstract int foo();
}
class B extends A {
public int foo() {
return 2;
}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test29/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A {
private TEST bar() {
return foo();
}
public abstract TEST foo();
}
class B extends A {
public TEST foo() {
return TEST.CHECK;
}
}
enum TEST {
CHECK;
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test30/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A {
public @interface Annotation {
String name() default "foo";
}
private int bar() {
return foo();
}
@Annotation (
name= "bar"
)
public abstract int foo();
}
class B extends A {
public int foo() {
return 2;
}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test31/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A {
public enum TEST {
CHECK;
}
private int bar() {
return foo();
}
public abstract int foo();
}
class B extends A {
public int foo() {
return 2;
}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test32/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A {
@interface Annotation {
String name();
}
private int bar() {
return foo();
}
public abstract int foo();
}
class B extends A {
public int foo() {
return 2;
}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test4/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A{
public abstract void m();
}
class B extends A{
public void m() {}
}
class B1 extends B{
}
class C extends A{
public void m() {}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test8/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A{
/**
* comment
*/
public abstract void m();
}
class B extends A{
public void m() {}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test9/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A{
/**
* comment
*/
public abstract void m();
}
class B extends A{
public void m() {}
}
class B1 extends B{
}
class C extends A{
public void m() {}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/testGenerics1/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A<T>{
public abstract void m();
}
class B extends A<String>{
public void m() {}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/testGenerics19/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A<T>{
public abstract void f();
public abstract T m(T t);
}
abstract class B extends A<String>{
public String m(String t) {
String s= t;
return null;
}
public abstract void f();
}
class C extends A<Object>{
public void f(){}
public Object m(Object t) {
Object s= t;
return n... |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/testGenerics4/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A<T>{
public abstract T m();
}
class B extends A<String>{
public String m() {return null;}
}
class B1 extends B{
}
class C extends A<String>{
public String m() {return null;}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/testGenerics8/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A<T>{
/**
* comment
*/
public abstract T m();
}
class B<T> extends A<T>{
public T m() {return null;}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/testGenerics9/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A<T>{
/**
* comment
*/
public abstract T m();
}
class B extends A<String>{
public String m() {return null;}
}
class B1 extends B{
}
class C extends A<Object>{
public Object m() {return null;}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/testVisibility0/out/A.java | package p;
abstract class A {
protected int bar() {
return foo();
}
public abstract int foo();
}
class B extends A {
public int foo() {
return bar();
}
} |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
112,603 | Bug 112603 Push Down does not add @Override | N20051013-0010 Push m() down, leaving it abstract in Try. The method in Sub should get an @Override annotation iff the target is in a 5.0 project. public class Try { protected void m() { System.out.println("working..."); } } class Sub extends Try { } | verified fixed | 487f19a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-19T16:36:29Z | 2005-10-14T08:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/PushDownRefactoring.java | |
111,422 | Bug 111422 [refactoring] Enable filtering in the Move refactoring preview dialog | I20050928-1300 + plug-in export for I20051004-0800 While testing the move functionality of the smoke test I moved a CU to another package using Refactor > Move... and checked and Update fully qualified... The new filter support was disabled but it would be handy to have it here as well even though textual matches are a... | verified fixed | ac846de | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T08:18:35Z | 2005-10-04T10:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
111,422 | Bug 111422 [refactoring] Enable filtering in the Move refactoring preview dialog | I20050928-1300 + plug-in export for I20051004-0800 While testing the move functionality of the smoke test I moved a CU to another package using Refactor > Move... and checked and Update fully qualified... The new filter support was disabled but it would be handy to have it here as well even though textual matches are a... | verified fixed | ac846de | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T08:18:35Z | 2005-10-04T10:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringCoreMessages.java | |
111,422 | Bug 111422 [refactoring] Enable filtering in the Move refactoring preview dialog | I20050928-1300 + plug-in export for I20051004-0800 While testing the move functionality of the smoke test I moved a CU to another package using Refactor > Move... and checked and Update fully qualified... The new filter support was disabled but it would be handy to have it here as well even though textual matches are a... | verified fixed | ac846de | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T08:18:35Z | 2005-10-04T10:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
111,422 | Bug 111422 [refactoring] Enable filtering in the Move refactoring preview dialog | I20050928-1300 + plug-in export for I20051004-0800 While testing the move functionality of the smoke test I moved a CU to another package using Refactor > Move... and checked and Update fully qualified... The new filter support was disabled but it would be handy to have it here as well even though textual matches are a... | verified fixed | ac846de | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T08:18:35Z | 2005-10-04T10:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/util/QualifiedNameFinder.java | |
111,422 | Bug 111422 [refactoring] Enable filtering in the Move refactoring preview dialog | I20050928-1300 + plug-in export for I20051004-0800 While testing the move functionality of the smoke test I moved a CU to another package using Refactor > Move... and checked and Update fully qualified... The new filter support was disabled but it would be handy to have it here as well even though textual matches are a... | verified fixed | ac846de | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T08:18:35Z | 2005-10-04T10:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
111,422 | Bug 111422 [refactoring] Enable filtering in the Move refactoring preview dialog | I20050928-1300 + plug-in export for I20051004-0800 While testing the move functionality of the smoke test I moved a CU to another package using Refactor > Move... and checked and Update fully qualified... The new filter support was disabled but it would be handy to have it here as well even though textual matches are a... | verified fixed | ac846de | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T08:18:35Z | 2005-10-04T10:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/util/QualifiedNameSearchResult.java | |
107,998 | Bug 107998 [refactoring] [move] Move method out of non-static inner class too strict. | The inner class is non-static, but the method only accesses a static field. So Eclipse shouldn't refuse to move it. Interestingly, Eclipse allows moving the 'number' field, but not the method, even though they're in the same inner class. ------------------------- Bug.java ------------------ public class Bug { public st... | verified fixed | 5bf79b7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T08:55:33Z | 2005-08-25T14:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
107,998 | Bug 107998 [refactoring] [move] Move method out of non-static inner class too strict. | The inner class is non-static, but the method only accesses a static field. So Eclipse shouldn't refuse to move it. Interestingly, Eclipse allows moving the 'number' field, but not the method, even though they're in the same inner class. ------------------------- Bug.java ------------------ public class Bug { public st... | verified fixed | 5bf79b7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T08:55:33Z | 2005-08-25T14:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveInstanceMethodProcessor.java | |
112,372 | Bug 112372 Strange error dialog during Move refactoring | I performed a move refactoring on some classes and included a search of text files. I clicked preview and after a slight wait, got an error dialog with an error message repeated four times (I will attach the dialog). The error basically told me to go to the preview page (which is where I was goin anyway). On the previe... | verified fixed | b0e6084 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T09:07:10Z | 2005-10-12T18:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
112,372 | Bug 112372 Strange error dialog during Move refactoring | I performed a move refactoring on some classes and included a search of text files. I clicked preview and after a slight wait, got an error dialog with an error message repeated four times (I will attach the dialog). The error basically told me to go to the preview page (which is where I was goin anyway). On the previe... | verified fixed | b0e6084 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T09:07:10Z | 2005-10-12T18:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringSearchEngine.java | |
113,159 | Bug 113159 CUEditor won't let me insert just one TAB | Given the following code: Pattern pattern = selected ? new Pattern(null,...) : new Pattern(nul,...); <<CARET>>g.setBackgroundPattern(pattern); I cannot insert a single TAB at the Caret location. typing TAB inserts two TABs. BACKSPACE deletes both. | verified fixed | 2b4043e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-20T10:48:29Z | 2005-10-19T22:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/actions/IndentAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
112,356 | Bug 112356 [syntax highlighting] Syntax highlight isn't applied to auto-unboxed expressions with a cast | In this example, neither the setBool() with explicit cast, nor the assignment to b2 indicate that the object is being auto-unboxed. It's unclear to me exactly what should be highlighted, the final term of the expression (this happens with non-casted expressions), or maybe the cast itself. --- public abstract class Boxi... | verified fixed | 1f6f21d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-24T15:44:38Z | 2005-10-12T15:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/SemanticHighlightings.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
113,998 | Bug 113998 [JUnit] New Test Case Wizard: Class Under Test Dialog -- allow Enums | Enums should be selectable types in the dialog. | verified fixed | ae31320 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-28T10:10:55Z | 2005-10-27T16:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/junit/wizards/NewTestCaseWizardPageOne.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.