issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test46/out/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test46/out/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test47/in/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test47/in/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test47/out/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test47/out/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test48/in/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test48/in/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test48/out/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test48/out/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test49/in/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test49/in/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test49/out/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test49/out/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test50/in/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test50/in/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test50/out/A.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test50/out/B.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail10/in/A.java | package p;
public class A{
public static void m(){
A.F= 0;
}
private static int F;
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail10/in/B.java | package p;
class B{
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail11/in/A.java | package p;
public class A{
private static int F;
public static int i= F;
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail11/in/B.java | package p;
class B{
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail12/in/A.java | package p;
public class A{
private static int m(){ return 1;};
public static int i= m();
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail12/in/B.java | package p;
class B{
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail13/in/A.java | package p;
public class A{
private static int m(){ return 1;};
public static int i= m();
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail13/in/B.java | package p;
class B{
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail14/in/A.java | package p;
public class A{
private static int i;
public static int F= i;
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail14/in/B.java | package p;
class B{
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail9/in/A.java | package p;
public class A{
public static void m(){
A.f();
}
private static void f(){}
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/testFail9/in/B.java | package p;
class B{
} |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/MoveMembersTests.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MemberVisibilityAdjustor.java | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
42,439 | Bug 42439 Moving a private static method should change the visibility [refactoring] | class A has a private static method f(). I realize that I could reuse that elsewhere, and in fact, it has little to do with A, but is simply used from there. So, I create a "util" class B to hold that method. I use Refactor-Move. Because this private method was called from A, it worked. After the refactoring, it's now ... | verified fixed | 0231f5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-22T14:40:18Z | 2003-09-03T11:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveStaticMembersProcessor.java | |
109,730 | Bug 109730 Surround with runnable quick assist | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050906-1200 Until now surround with runnable was only a text templat. This patches add a quick assist for surround with runnable. Variable declarations are made final and initializers are split off if required. Surround with runnable does not guarantee to generate syntactically correct code ... | verified fixed | 7217772 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-23T13:44:23Z | 2005-09-16T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/AssistQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,730 | Bug 109730 Surround with runnable quick assist | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050906-1200 Until now surround with runnable was only a text templat. This patches add a quick assist for surround with runnable. Variable declarations are made final and initializers are split off if required. Surround with runnable does not guarantee to generate syntactically correct code ... | verified fixed | 7217772 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-23T13:44:23Z | 2005-09-16T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
109,730 | Bug 109730 Surround with runnable quick assist | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050906-1200 Until now surround with runnable was only a text templat. This patches add a quick assist for surround with runnable. Variable declarations are made final and initializers are split off if required. Surround with runnable does not guarantee to generate syntactically correct code ... | verified fixed | 7217772 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-23T13:44:23Z | 2005-09-16T14:13:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/surround/SurroundWithAnalyzer.java | |
109,730 | Bug 109730 Surround with runnable quick assist | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050906-1200 Until now surround with runnable was only a text templat. This patches add a quick assist for surround with runnable. Variable declarations are made final and initializers are split off if required. Surround with runnable does not guarantee to generate syntactically correct code ... | verified fixed | 7217772 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-23T13:44:23Z | 2005-09-16T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
109,730 | Bug 109730 Surround with runnable quick assist | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050906-1200 Until now surround with runnable was only a text templat. This patches add a quick assist for surround with runnable. Variable declarations are made final and initializers are split off if required. Surround with runnable does not guarantee to generate syntactically correct code ... | verified fixed | 7217772 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-23T13:44:23Z | 2005-09-16T14:13:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/surround/SurroundWithTryCatchAnalyzer.java | |
109,730 | Bug 109730 Surround with runnable quick assist | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050906-1200 Until now surround with runnable was only a text templat. This patches add a quick assist for surround with runnable. Variable declarations are made final and initializers are split off if required. Surround with runnable does not guarantee to generate syntactically correct code ... | verified fixed | 7217772 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-23T13:44:23Z | 2005-09-16T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/CorrectionMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,730 | Bug 109730 Surround with runnable quick assist | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050906-1200 Until now surround with runnable was only a text templat. This patches add a quick assist for surround with runnable. Variable declarations are made final and initializers are split off if required. Surround with runnable does not guarantee to generate syntactically correct code ... | verified fixed | 7217772 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-23T13:44:23Z | 2005-09-16T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/QuickAssistProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,730 | Bug 109730 Surround with runnable quick assist | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050906-1200 Until now surround with runnable was only a text templat. This patches add a quick assist for surround with runnable. Variable declarations are made final and initializers are split off if required. Surround with runnable does not guarantee to generate syntactically correct code ... | verified fixed | 7217772 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-23T13:44:23Z | 2005-09-16T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SurroundWithRunnableProposal.java | |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CodeFormatterPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CodeStylePreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/ComplianceConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CompliancePreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/ImportOrganizePreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavaBuildConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavaBuildPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavadocProblemsConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavadocProblemsPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/OptionsConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/ProblemSeveritiesConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/ProblemSeveritiesPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/TodoTaskConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
108,793 | Bug 108793 [preferences] Widget gets enabeled when restore to defaults is pressed | 1. set Workspace Compiler > Javadoc > 'Malformed Javadoc comments' setting to 'warning' 2. click 'OK' 3. open project properties of that preference 4. click 'Restore Defaults' ==> some of the widgets become visually enabled but in fact they are disabled. Martin, can you please investigate. If easy to fix then we should... | verified fixed | 7dba6da | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T16:41:04Z | 2005-09-05T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/TodoTaskPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,445 | Bug 101445 E3.1RC3 User Library Prefs LoadSave status msg | Eclipse 3.1RC3 There are User Library Preferences LoadSave dialog status messages that are not being displayed. This is because the LoadSaveDialog is not registering as a DialogFieldListener for fExportImportList. The fix... IN: UserLibraryPreferencePage.LoadSaveDialog (constructor) ADD: fExportImportList.setDialogFiel... | verified fixed | ebe9706 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T17:08:57Z | 2005-06-23T15:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/UserLibraryPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
98,104 | Bug 98104 Javadoc locations in archives should correctly handle ! in path | null | verified fixed | b641917 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T17:30:21Z | 2005-06-02T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavadocConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
98,104 | Bug 98104 Javadoc locations in archives should correctly handle ! in path | null | verified fixed | b641917 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-27T17:30:21Z | 2005-06-02T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/CPListLabelProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
106,073 | Bug 106073 [quick fix] Remove invalid modifiers does not work for constructors | Hi, When I write the bad statement "static private SomeConstructor() {", Eclipse gives me a hint to remove the invalid modifier "static", but it does not work! In other words clicking on the hint will do nothing (just moves the cursor on the middle of the static keyword!) | verified fixed | 4784434 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-28T09:52:58Z | 2005-08-04T15:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/ModifierCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
106,073 | Bug 106073 [quick fix] Remove invalid modifiers does not work for constructors | Hi, When I write the bad statement "static private SomeConstructor() {", Eclipse gives me a hint to remove the invalid modifier "static", but it does not work! In other words clicking on the hint will do nothing (just moves the cursor on the middle of the static keyword!) | verified fixed | 4784434 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-28T09:52:58Z | 2005-08-04T15:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ModifierCorrectionSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
104,743 | Bug 104743 Type Filters matches types it shouldn't | The Spring framework currently has separate packages to support Hibernate2 and Hibernate3, and the classes' names are the same. For example: org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.support.OpenSessionInViewFilter and org.springframework.orm.hibernate.support.OpenSessionInViewFilter Since I'm using Hibernate3, I want to filt... | verified fixed | 4d0d3fd | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-28T10:09:39Z | 2005-07-21T21:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
104,743 | Bug 104743 Type Filters matches types it shouldn't | The Spring framework currently has separate packages to support Hibernate2 and Hibernate3, and the classes' names are the same. For example: org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.support.OpenSessionInViewFilter and org.springframework.orm.hibernate.support.OpenSessionInViewFilter Since I'm using Hibernate3, I want to filt... | verified fixed | 4d0d3fd | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-28T10:09:39Z | 2005-07-21T21:06:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/TypeFilter.java | |
110,956 | Bug 110956 Failing test case after fixing bug 109963 in head. | null | verified fixed | b6823e4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-28T16:23:36Z | 2005-09-28T15:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/AssistQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
97,316 | Bug 97316 [5.0][typing] Problems with quick fix "Add javadoc comment" | null | verified fixed | f250ee3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-09-28T17:00:07Z | 2005-05-30T16:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/JavadocQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
110,986 | Bug 110986 [nls tooling] properties editor is RTL in RTL environments | 3.1.1 RC1 with arabic catalogs and -dir rtl The properties file editor is rtl in a rtl environment which make it unreadable as the keys are not lined up | verified fixed | bc4f682 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T13:39:32Z | 2005-09-28T20:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/propertiesfileeditor/PropertiesFileEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddCustomConstructorOperation.java | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddDelegateMethodsOperation.java | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddGetterSetterOperation.java | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddUnimplementedConstructorsOperation.java | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddUnimplementedMethodsOperation.java | |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/browsing/JavaBrowsingPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dnd/ResourceTransferDragAdapter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/newsourcepage/BuildPathAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,338 | Bug 111338 [implementation] new option causing error in org.eclipse.ui.editors | I picked up N20051001-0010 and it looks like a new compiler preference has added a compile error to org.eclipse.ui.editors. From my problems view: Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id 2 Unnecessary cast from Object to IEncodingSupport AbstractDecoratedTextEditor.java org.eclipse.ui.editors/... | verified fixed | d1077ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-03T17:30:49Z | 2005-10-03T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/FindAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,185 | Bug 111185 Move Inner Type To New File does not always honor checkbox "make field final" | I20050927-1200 Move a non-static inner type to a new file. In the wizard, enter a name for an enclosing instance field, but do not check "make final". Observe: The created field is final. It works if the checkbox is checked and then unchecked again. | verified fixed | dc84f5e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T08:58:25Z | 2005-09-30T08:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
111,185 | Bug 111185 Move Inner Type To New File does not always honor checkbox "make field final" | I20050927-1200 Move a non-static inner type to a new file. In the wizard, enter a name for an enclosing instance field, but do not check "make final". Observe: The created field is final. It works if the checkbox is checked and then unchecked again. | verified fixed | dc84f5e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T08:58:25Z | 2005-09-30T08:46:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/MoveInnerToTopWizard.java | |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/SortMembersOperation.java | |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/JavaUIMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/actions/ActionMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/OptionalMessageDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SortMembersMessageDialog.java | |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/MembersOrderPreferenceCache.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/MembersOrderPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/PreferencesMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
109,562 | Bug 109562 [code manipulation] "Sort Members" reorders the enum constants in enums. | Irrespective of the settings of preferences controlling Sort Members, it should not reorder enum constants because their order has semantic significance. | verified fixed | 58c7119 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-04T09:38:59Z | 2005-09-15T04:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/SortMembersAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
111,423 | Bug 111423 Caller hierarchy lists methods unsorted | I20050928-1300 + plug-in export for I20051004-0800 1. open caller hierarchy on ProjectionMapping.toImageRegion(IRegion) ==> caller list is unsorted and no option to enable sorting | verified fixed | b373c13 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-05T10:08:31Z | 2005-10-04T10:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/callhierarchy/CallHierarchyViewPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CodeFormatterPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/PreferencesAccess.java | |
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/CodeFormatterConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/CreateProfileDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
101,619 | Bug 101619 [formatter] Formatter profiles store even though I clicked 'Cancel' | I20050624-0010 1. open the formatter preference page 2. switch from existing profile p1 to another, lets say p2 3. click 'Cancel' Expected: my formatter profile is still p1 but it is now p2. | verified fixed | 984f271 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-10-06T15:41:04Z | 2005-06-24T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/FormatterMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.