Unnamed: 0 int64 0 3.88k | id stringlengths 44 47 | autor stringclasses 181 values | title stringlengths 2 71 | rank int64 1 5 | maxRank int64 5 5 | source stringclasses 1 value | summary stringlengths 9 396 | body stringlengths 352 24.4k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,100 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/222 | Jose Contreras | Xmen3 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | X - Men 3 destroys nothing less than the Golden Gate Bridge in a prodigy of mutant engineering who already want to sign many human architects | The third part of X-Men is summarized in the run-up to a battle. The forces of evil, led by Magneto want to destroy a drug, called "The cure", a mutant turns into a normal man. The forces of good, led by Xavier want to avoid it because the drug is only freely given to who requests it. They are right who say that this is the most superficial of the three films. It is the most superficial, but not enough.In the first part, Magneto was much more tax because I wanted to become mutant mankind. The third remains intransigent, does not respect the freedom of those who choose not to be mutants. The reason is Xavier. But not so clearly. It happens like that in a strike are right a few to sabotage the work of all? Are entitled the strikers to make pickets? The theme is thorny, why mutants change both sides. The hesitations, the comings and goings of mutants composed a long digression on individual freedom and collective responsibility. They are the preamble to a confrontation where the excitement of the film concentrates. The two armies have been defined finally: what are its strengths? The second question: who will win? always save fewer surprises.Someone should write one of those film books full of photos with a catalogue of all the monuments that has destroyed the film for the greater glory of the cultural heritage of the United States. In Spain only we could showcase to Alex de la Iglesia to satanizó medium Madrid for this badass wonder titled "The day of the beast". X - Men 3 destroys nothing less than the Golden Gate Bridge in a prodigy of mutant engineering who already want to sign many human architects. |
2,101 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4092 | Tito Chinchan | La insólita y gloriosa hazaña del cipote de Archidona | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Film about a glorious cock and eyaculadora strength of the people of Archidona. Kids in porretas, sympathetic expressions and some funny situations for a final cameo in Cela. Decent film uncover, for which the genre we like. | Director: Ramón Fernández. duration: 86 minutes.Release date: March 2, 1979.Espectadores: 933.973 of human beings.Many years ago, when a server was a preteen, I found in the House of my grandfather Manolo (in peace rest) a graphic novelilla with this strange title. Since that was the only thing graphic for a prepuber, because I ended up throwing him a visual. The book only remember the cartoons, in particular that of the final scene, that made me laugh. Not be if you have something to do with future onanistas passions.The film is about a village called Archidona, which are visited by a magazine music, full of women in leather like every year. This coming, as it is assumed, removes the low bellies of all inhabitants, with more or less fuss attending the annual meeting. But this year, four members get to flirt with four young girls good looking, what comes in direct conflict with their girlfriends of all life. These, rather than riding them a number, choose dry las médulas so that they can not meet her new lovers.I have to say that when appeared the first tit, before the "Sueno" look of my little, I said "Oh, didn't this work outside the destape". Curious hallazo, by Jove. The film, like so many, has little chicha. There are nice scenes, based on curious expressions, that made me laugh pretty. Then leave women in porretas, with more justification than usually. And finally Cela leaves reading part of his work (or whole, not is), providing a touch intellectual and cultured what was nothing more than an excuse to draw naked women. It can be seen.In short, film about a glorious cock and eyaculadora strength of the people of Archidona. Kids in porretas, sympathetic expressions and some funny situations for a final cameo in Cela. Decent film uncover, for which the genre we like.Besitos.P.D: My baby is amazing. I put a movie of these and stays with eyes as dishes. I put Pocoyo, and runs. Caste comes to the Greyhound, which says the conventional wisdom. |
2,102 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2021 | Tyler | Dogville | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The film is a very physical thing... film is Sam Peckimpah, Andy Warhol.... the film isn't so you can see it. Corny metaphors and the dejemoslas aside videocreations. | I'm not really very objective to speak of someone like Lars Von Trier. Personally I think that you one of the most terrible filmmakers in the history of the cinema. I think that it makes a film so stupid that even should be no case. "Not even for bad.""Dogville" is not that it will. It is the bullshit elevated to the cube of the pretentiousness. It is the nonsense of a sort of videoartísta who believes Dios.Desde the principle one realizes. This girl comes to this abnormal pa people hide from some gangsters. There they her putean. Listo.Lo of the people is pa to eat separately. Esque thing that there is nothing at all and I I have to imagine seems to me an insult to the Viewer. Making us believe that it is an artistic appeal that look at actors, as has done it to make it as a book (which us us us imagine. buah) and that is a metaphor about the modern world and blah blah blah.Please. We must be serious. The movie cannot be more bad although it tried. Nicole is not of my devotion and here shows his coldness as the puteada Grace.Didn't ever know what happened, and I get nervous everytime I see someone manipulate something that does not exist. When I see these broods painted on the floor without any reason more than save paste to give the Kidman.No any good Von Trier movie I remember. only an argument that was funny... of "Epidemic"... then is a suckling pig.Lars Von Trier also made a second part that I've refused to see, among other things because he made that they killed, really, a burrito during filming. Just as Almodovar when he "Talk with Ella" (another crappy). Von Trier replaced actress claiming that "you want a Grace that is different in each part of the trilogy", because esque is also a trilogy!The film is a very physical thing. the film is Sam Peckimpah, not Andy Warhol... the film is so you can see it. Corny metaphors and the dejemoslas aside videocreations.I am not saying that it is a video creation. what I say esque is not film. It is ottra thing. "Dogville" rejected the film. the film is set of long ago, and if we reduce the film to its minimal essence we have two very simple elements, time and space. Everything comes from there. You play with those two elements. It is the only thing that is. And "Dogville" rejects them both to give a progressive propaganda speech heard a thousand times and that it is boring. The film first and foremost, rather than lecturing or have moral cavities or move or Excite. you would not get bored. Then say what you want, but complies with the rules. "Dogville" does nothing. |
2,103 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1782 | Jose Contreras | El buen pastor | 3 | 5 | muchocine | These actors stuck to directors think they run so that we know that they are not stupid.All of them seek to be difficult. The postmodern style seems to be abuse of the intelligent ellipsis; on the assumption that the Viewer is a star guy... | These actors stuck to directors, as Clooney in "good night and good luck", flags, or De Niro, it seems that they directed so that we know that they are not stupid. "The good Shepherd" speaks of the threads of history that have led us to where we are, the threads that move the world, equal than "Syriana", or "Lord of war". All of them seek to be difficult. The postmodern style seems to be abuse of the intelligent ellipsis; on the assumption that the Viewer is a star guy. The postmodern director does not explain, presupposes that we're back everything, it anticipates our anticipations. And I think that it is high time to claim a film easier.De Niro begins the film pose a mystery. The CIA was defeated at Bay of pigs because Fidel Castro had a snitch. While Damon investigates who was, history makes a tour, not entirely essential, by the past of the protagonist, and the birth of the Department of intelligence during the second war Mundial.Si forget the secondary plots, which is easy to do thanks to their endless proliferation, the film poses a moral dilemma between the homeland and the heart or between duty and happiness. Nonetheless be disturbing, but it responds too paternalistic. Hands like these, the end "Romeo and Juliet" would become a lesson for Brats children, and parents of the Capuleto and the Montesco would be the heroes. |
2,104 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/292 | Caty | Las colinas tienen ojos | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Is a brutal experience after a seemingly serene first half an hour that does not give rest to the nerves of the Viewer | The remakes, especially in horror movies, are the order of the day in the Mecca of cinema, some better adapted, other worse. We have to take into account that in the seventh art, and especially in this genus, all, absolutely everything is invented, so all we have left is know playing with the elements that already specifics and make something really "visible". We saw in his day for example with productions as "Dawn of the dead" How can return to bring an idea to the big screen with enough dignity to the original, as well as to my opinion happens to this "the hills have eyes" remake of the production of the well-known Wes Craven(con_detractores_y_defensores_a_partes_iguales)creator of sagas as Scream or nightmare on Elm Street.La story is told the journey of a family vacation, at one point in the journey, will lead to a desert area that previously had been a Government nuclear test area."After an accident with the car that leaves them momentarily abandoned in place, realize immediately which, despite the apparent vastness depopulated land they observe, after those stones, after those hills, live"something", or"someone".""The hills have eyes" is a brutal experience after an apparently first serena half an hour that does not give rest to the nerves of the Viewer. Not revolutionizes the horror film, that is more clear, but it is an injection for that part of the genre we like many of terror sordid without scares sweetened for the teenage audience, but with the brutality that entails the fact survive to a / a pursuer is serving not reasons.The fluidity of the direction, incredible photography and sharing that, despite consist of names not very mediáticos(quizás_el_más_en_boga_hoy_en_día_sea_el_de_Emilie_de_Ravin,_Claire_en_la_famosa_serie_"Perdidos") know slipping into an argument - with critical social included - where the adrenaline and the feeling of claustrophobia carried some results more than correct. When I left the room, I stayed with the same feeling that in his day when I saw "Kilometre 666": he hoped to find me a 15 pigswill and left with the pleasant feeling of having attended as usual, but with a way to combine the "clichés" as sufficiently well as to make it fun and intriguing. Again I repeat: do not expect to find anything original, but if you like the genre you pasaréis entretenidísimo awhile. |
2,105 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1734 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | 300 | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Overwhelming merely visually stunning epic, meticulous in detail, rich in reading, Opera: will go down in the history of cinema to open a new market, a different way of understanding the entertainment in the 21st century. And he is supported for this scribe is love with and that come predictable hyperbole in their considerations because that dictates the emotion that inevitably overwhelms him. | Confined to sporadic outbursts of mass consumption type Gladiator, the peplum epic film of Romans or adjacent civilizations it has always had ups and downs in his popular dissemination, small ridges and big drops, although when it succeeds (like the Spanish when he did that said) triumphs of truth. 300 is the pitch of the season and not only raises the adhesions or usual repulsas in whom we tend to give written testimony on this celebrity is the film that sometimes wakes up lit bar conversations, incendiary purpose of their benefits and their limitations. 300 Marks with it aims to their very savvy funders: everybody, you've read or not something the tape, has heard or not something on your content, go to the cinema, let the bitches and leave with an overdose of manly meat, muscular and tense, and that no one think that this getting me shirt of eleven sticks or tribulations filogay, who even in that wanted some search of arguments to this piece of film (already start the evisceration) should not see any film lover and gives the same leave excited as the Viking Vikie or sad as Buster Keaton in his good time 300 narrates a battle: basically (with small subsidiaries frames) what counts is ésothe savage onslaught of a Persian army huge and invincible on a handful of Spartans to heroic in number of 300 are courageous facing this inconsumerable numerical disproportion. The fundamental issue, which makes 300 not to any other movie ever filmed, is its nature pioneered certain types of film that extracted from as it surrounds him their formal material, its way to revolutionize an art that has always been attentive to the changes and that never has foregone innovations technological, either sound like color or dolby or hortero 3D. Then appeared the digital language and then the film, the seventh of the arts, renounced their share of the cake and adopted (for the benefit of the public goloso) points of view and ways of filming (and especially mount) surprised the viewer of the fifties when the peak of the audacity in special effects were somethings corpses of Jason and the Argonauts. Visual ventures of 300 colman many demands and a director that already promised in the undervalued is crowned (the gore genre anda fall viscus) dawn of the dead, Zack Snyder perpetrating a fantastic distraction that is not intended to delve into the history or pontificate on certain values but romanticize a series of events of eminently epic nature: the battle of the pass of Thermopylaea corridor to ras costa, a detachment of thrown notables of selfless spirit and vocation of martyrs and a mammoth representation of the enemy in the form of human flood.The speech of the film is not flat: contains an exacerbated tone military harangue of unequivocally jingoistic message that love the reservist Yankee and the viewer an accomplice of the nationalist iconography to use, but also reads a least overload ideology to primitive and crude fascism which seems to derive from the film, and many critics sing as inalienable nature of the proposal of Snyder can be drawn. I refer to the addictive staging, to his pursuers concatenation of scenes of a force out of the ordinary. If we look at the film as mere entertainment (without addressing its cultural sediment, without looking at their fidelity to history, without any unnecessary game of contemporaneity), 300 is an absolute joy, a gap in the movies next, a kind of point and separate so that the hard core of production in Hollywood know where they stand and onwards, not spare a dollar in the billing of films of this nature which combines splendidly (own) modernity (Frank Millar comic) and some aftertaste pulp, tribute honest to all literature of serie B and the exhausted graphic literature in which Miller Dove for shaping its history of Spartans and Persians, Leonidas (a great George Butler) and Xerxes (an effeminate Rodrigo Santero).Those who want to delve into other aspects, has material that get lost. 300 acquiesce to forge a new genre whose name would not know we here present. As if we hold a supported digital Baroque not only in a hypnotic plasticity but in a very solid script (when the argument seems to give so little) that even has a voice in magnificent, literary, captivating, off which seems to recite the heroic passage of Sparta brave defenders against the barbarian hordes who seek to invade.In the light of today, 300 acquires a relevant significance, we have already said. Can you take into consideration that the Spartans are the champions of what later has been called West or Europe and Xerxes and his Persian riding elephants, rhinos and other mythological bestiaries represents the interference of another enemy, who comes from outside and so seeks to penalty to refuse future impose on us its present. That is all very well. There is consent that the film raises it and similar dialogues, but it is also the incomparable the film grace as entertainment and then 300 is a work of art, a work of art written at the beginning of the 21st century. Like art, as human language, adapting to the times and is supplied from their signs to reform its ideology and face the future with some solvency and chances of success.The choreography of the fights is an absolute beauty and this scribe is no friend of fighting on screen and has never enjoyed scene with abundant minutaje where they call others. Here, for once, everything complies with the major dictation of a script that one believes all, lack of importance that the cash be recognized as truthful or we understand that all seeking Snyder is adapted to the cinema (and go adaptation) comics of Millar, who in turn adapted to graphic art an episode of history Herodotus collected in his book VII of Hellenic history. And then the world was Greece. 300 lacks modesty: not accurate wimpish concessions to orthodoxy. There is blood (that dance in the air as if he re-wrote a choreography to the beat of Spears) and there is a rudimentary sense of violence which has nothing to do with concepts of violence that we have been acquiring, almost accidentally, by pure film lover spirit, by the hand of Tarantino, Boorman or Stone. This is different: it wins our consent with only investigate the mythological nature of its plot. Meaningless search ethical commitments on the idiocy of the violence and all that so wise and so good looking in these times of political correctness (apparent, clear) which we have planted on screen is when a reading (one more) of a classic episode reading Latin texts when I studied B.U.P. |
2,106 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3768 | Jokin García | Bee movie | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Fun, which is what can ask you for a film of this genre. Suitable for consumption by both children and adults. | Bee Movie, a comedy is about. bees. An incongruous and funny film, with final moral on the vital importance of these yellow insects in the ecosystem and the catastrophic consequences that would have his disappearance on the planet.In the purest style of these films, the protagonist fights against the system, resisting to be one more and give good fate that preasigna you (as already happened for example in Antz) and in this case the protagonist is Barry B. Benson, a young bee that newly graduate refuses to a boring life of worker bee and decides to join the squadron of elite of foragers to see the outside world, and there meets a human, Vanessa, which became a pretty friendly. Yes, the bees speak and read, ye seek not sense.But not everything is beautiful on the outside, and Barry discovers a terrifying truth: humans enslave bees for stealing honey and gasean them. (And you know who gaseaban people, isn't it?) And there is where happens one of the events of the film, when Barry decides to bring a lawsuit against humanity, a hilarious and absurd trial, Cup much of the film and some truly subtility moments, especially the totally autoparódicas appearances of Sting and Ray Liotta as well as the winks to talk show host Larry King and to the teddy bear Winnie the Pooh.Sin doubt the best of the film is the absurdity of their situationswith totally impossible scenes but at the service of the laugh or at least smile, and even if it does not reach the level of classics like Shrek or Finding Nemo, is a choice of entertaining to spend the afternoon and to establish some comparison, the would over Madagascar or fun Robots.Muy also that brutal hack through the mosquito, typical secondary comedianthe movie gets to the Group of lawyers. Kidding, for obvious reasons, made that I broke out in a laugh. |
2,107 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1126 | Yul B. | Arthur y los Minimoys | 3 | 5 | muchocine | If you are going with your children to the cinema to see?Arthur and the Invisibles? You pasaréis a fun afternoon. That Yes, enjoy it with the spirit and the eyes of a child. | Said me a bird out there on this blog not critical films of animation with the appropriate point of view: that of a child.I even read a comment on one of our entries in which a reader predicts almost rightly we have no churumbeles (some Yes) for the way in which we writing about the news in question.It may be true; do first, something obvious: the drafters of this blog are no longer children, although I particularly have something of? kid-adult?; and, secondly, because it is such the avalanche suffered in the last years of animated films exclusively adult court, or theme interspersed between talludita and child, or only intended for children, already one loses perspective.So moved by the healthy slap me I decided to go see?Arthur and the Invisibles? with the intention of objectively be a toddler and put me in a situation. Pail large popcorn, a couple of chocolates, a bag of gums, and a bottle of water (cola soft drinks give me gas; what I am going to do, I can not deceive me both).The truth is that the film mixes real images and CGI, found me entertaining, ideal so her you can see with your children (who have them). The argument makes things much easier: just when his grandmother (Mia Farrow) is about to lose the House in which he lives, Arthur (Freddie Highmore), a 10-year-old boy, recalls that his grandfather he had spoken of a large hidden treasure in the land of the Minimoys, a universe of small fantastic beings that live in harmony with naturea world so distant and nevertheless so near and invisible to the human eye.Determined to save his grandmother, Arthur will get the key to enter therein and there will know the Princess Selenia and her brother Betameche. Together they will look for the hidden treasure and must face the evil M, in a fast-paced adventure.I love the aesthetics of video game that has this film. Luc Besson and his team have succeeded in creating a lively world very close to your destination, with a hotel look audience for the film. All CGI characters are designed in detail, but without being hyperrealistic, giving them a personality to each one of them easily recognizable. The Princess Selenia is a beauty.Do I could not help but remember of?The tiny? in many of the scenes taking place in the fascinating world of the Minimoys, which has been a virtue because for me the memories of this TV series are absolutely welcome.Perhaps the decision of not joining in the same scene real footage with CGI disconcerting even to the smallest Viewer, that the change of several planes of other animation with flesh bone, without apparent continuity, actors disturbs a bit. Except some that another story slip, the script is at good level, maintaining an adventurous tension directed clearly to not rest nor the most clueless child.As for the main actors, I just have exceptional words about Freddie Highmore. It is a machine of actor, hopefully keep this magic that transmits when it passes through adolescence and reach maturity, because if so we are before a crack in the history of the cinema; as Mia Farrow, sorry to say that it is expendable, because any other actress of his same fifth could have done this role.As I can not avoid having the age I am, flaws that I see as an adult of this film are as follows: the plot is so fast, that it not delves into the characters, not of flesh and blood, or animated, so there are times that the storyline is lost. Footage from the film, an hour and a low average, may be one of the reasons for this defect.On the other hand, although the film is aimed at children between 4 and 13 years, there are certain times with a sexual component uncomfortable and not very suitable for a child audience (though today children is very short).Do with explained, can say without risk to make mistakes that if are going to the movies with your children to see?Arthur and the Invisibles? You pasaréis a fun afternoon. That Yes, enjoy it with the spirit and the eyes of a child. |
2,108 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/20 | Verolindapechocha | Una historia violenta | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A really violent history | A story violent, 2005, is really violent. Never better put a title. Please, be them not happen go with under 10 years old nephews because they leave them for psychiatric therapy about five years at least. Death and sex explicit, close up. But apart from violent is slow. So slow that in many parts it is suffocating. I.e. the film causes stress, because between that nothing happens or they spend the most cruel things in a moment to another.I went to see it with too many expectations, because it was marketed as one of the best releases of the year, strong candidate for Golden Globe, etc. But nothing to do. The actions of the majority of the cast are inocentonas and little professionals. Bad casting. The actions of the protagonist, Viggo Mortensen (the Lord of the rings, 2001-2003) it is good, like the of tours actors Ed Harris (the hours, 2002) and William Hurt (Artificial Intelligence, 2001). But the rest of the cast? |
2,109 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3835 | Bruji | American Gangster | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The favorite actors of the Scott brothers delight with separate master interpretations in that it could be the movie of the year. | The proven expertise of the best director in the world makes a complex plot of the American underworld bosses for beginners manual. For its part, the favorite actors of the Scott brothers delight with separate master interpretations in that it could be the movie of the year.Make the difficult easy is tremendously more laborious to make the simple complicated. Perhaps that is why proliferate films that enjoy the blessing of this sector of the criticism that should be called "transgression" to everything that no one understands. Perhaps for the same reason, the less learned, that we never see bread where there is wine, found in the trend of Ridley Scott flee the half-hearted, the guarantee of an almost always safe bet.Which was considered "best director in the world" in the 1980s with titles such as Alien and Blade Runner, with a style - moments-comparable to Stanley Kubrick in the Duelists, expert Narrator of locations (Black Rain), undisputed master of aesthetics and forceful director of actors, able to extract better performances than those who have worked under his command (Thelma and Louise)(, Lieutenant O'Neil), still seeks the recognition of a prize Oscar. After sound failures as 1492: the conquest of paradise and the Kingdom of heaven, has been able to go back in the direction of films like Gladiator (funny remake of the fall of the Roman Empire) or Los impostors; to provide, recently, a new dimension to the traditional romantic comedies, transforming the bland script for A good year in a pleasant viewing footage.American Gangster is where Scott of best time to recover.The story of powerful home and confusing approach that makes honour to one of his phrases: "this is a chaos, every bully acts on their own," soon will be normalized into a powerful development of an apotheosis outcome. Shoot in one hundred fifty and two decorations different alternating with natural spaces, in a country of political instability such as Thailand, in the five boroughs of New York City, in emblematic mansions located in the place of residence of billionaires as Rockefeller, which give way to low income apartments built by the City Council; It was a challenge that only a "director of environments" would be able to solve. Scott, with his "style of shooting guerilla" camera in hand, expanded the system of multicameras in the action scenes, and with a spectacular variety of wide shots, transports the Viewer from Viet Nam until the Harlem 116th Street without him shaking the pulse, in a feat that is not always reciprocated with the Director of photography.On the other hand, the complex network that holds the American underworld world in the 1970s, shown with the profusion of strokes ranging from 1013 police until the attainment of the blue magic, since a security system that does not hesitate to intercept a cache of heroin which will be cut and resold to the honesty of who returns a Briefcase of banknotes unnumbered; It will masterfully reconducido towards the creation of a simple story of Lords for beginners. A story of narration fluid and careful passing, failure by the edges, proving inadequate measurement of time, result of an abrupt mounting, with total safety, suffered the revision of the producer, adapting the length of the footage with a view to their distribution.Without fear of being wrong, can ensure that the major asset of this film, sometimes, as irregular as the professional career of the director on his latest projects, lies in the choice of the main actors very capable of solving action in solo, immersed in a contradictory but accurate description of characters.Thus, while the role played by the eternally deadpan Russell Crowe seems to have been removed from a "black takeover" of a prefabricated common history to perfect policemen facing members of his Department, unable to keep his private life because of their continuous love affairs (do not reminded to Clint Eastwood's performance clear?), with the extension of incorruptibility we knew in Serpico; the back story of drug dealer opts for the peculiarities of the gangster genuinely American willing to upset the balance between the families of the lower depths. And as there are no benefits or the absolute evils, and those who remain on our side not always are "one of ours"; the adulterer aware to clean his conscience without receding a bit in their longing for Justice; directly responsible for thousands of deaths, with the appearance of business that must be defended, will prove to be an exemplary son, brother and husband, that does not neglect the mass on Sundays; and life, by one of those strange coincidences of "synchronicity", will bring together both destinations to uncover one of the biggest scandals ever written in the history of the United States of America. In a final balance sheet, we are left with the soul of the footage, which is none other than the priceless performance that got moved to the real Frank Lucas, Denzel Washington; with the irresistible image of Richie Roberts in jeans, with the great moments glued with bullets and perseverance. We are left with the devastating scene of the Thanksgiving giving way to the ravages among consumers of a city covered in white powder, with the retime the stairs that lead to the heart of the New York police, the arrest produced in Harlem, with a memorable vis á vis, and with the conviction that the typically American resolution that culminates the life trajectory of the characters can turn it in the best film of the year. A year in which those who claimed that Ridley Scott was the best director in the world should be right. |
2,110 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/876 | Nisuyaves | El perfume | 2 | 5 | muchocine | There is nothing interesting, until it comes to Monty Python, and is the orgy scene should be the last work of the English, because you can not stop laughing. | We have one film who say that Tom Tykwer is headed by and this may really be so until that happens more or less an hour and a half and is something that I will comment on later. The truth is that nosé if going to the cinema to 1625 or by the suckling pig of the film I was a little fried during the movie, and it is the only explanation given that this man becomes crazy is that it smells more than normal.The principle is good, and did foresee something more, what approach to objects that is sniffing, or about childbirth, is pretty well. Then the boy begins to find life and start the suckling pig, it loads the first girl by mistake, trying to it not yell, but hey as you cannot be so beast, finally. More later joins the decorative or perfumer anyway, they flip and prepares 100 perfumes come and more. Gets a cat where are the oils for perfumes, madremía.There is nothing interesting, until it comes to Monty Python, and is the orgy scene should be the last work of the English, because it can not stop laughing, with the initial astonishment logical, the most ridiculous form of conquer the town, the father of the dead girl, and even the priest, hehe, and when waking up, which descojone, but of the entire room eh!, I ask that if someone saw it in the cinema I comment out if people laughed or not, because in my room was tremendous. A man in front said "but good, this is incredible, this is unforgivable," but is that so absurd that was.Peorcito, those who have read the book say, they do not explain many things which are vital for understanding the poor protagonist, of always, the case is that the adaptation to the big screen is the worst. |
2,111 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2152 | Patri | El hombre del tiempo | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The weather man pretends to be the portrait of the life of a poor unfortunate fails nothing will goes well. And although it stays close to do this, you cannot move. | The weather man is based on a good idea, but it stays halfway, Nicolas Cage and Michael Caine's performances are very good, but it is not enough to bring up a movie that could have been much better.More striking is the soundtrack, with music by composer Hans Zimmer that does not fit and, at some times comes to bother quite as being too repetitive and neutral, also stresses much because it is used quite the appeal of cut dry the soundtrack when it begins a dialogue, which in another context would be very good, but here just not curdle.The moments of humor are the best of the film, and counteract the drama of the life of the protagonist, that everything will goes wrong.The typical humorous scene in which a character or two leave sitting with the lost look too abused, is an effect quite funny, but if abused it starts to seem redundant, but the face of Nicolas Cage and Michael Caine is priceless.The stories of the children of the protagonist are a bit stuck with shoehorn in the film, especially that of the son with the Counselor (which is also totally predictable), do not advance film and in some moments it seems that the plot has stopped and it won't anywhere.The weather man pretends to be the portrait of the life of a poor unfortunate fails nothing will goes well. And although it stays close to do this, you cannot move. |
2,112 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3553 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Beowulf | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Obviously actions and situations that are generated are really topical and there are no surprises on the final outcome or on acts of the Warrior because to Zemeckis that actually puts are the píxelesy it shows a little. | I think that Zemeckis has freak clamp. After Polar Express taste to that of animation that decided to put its efforts to create a fully digital world took you so much more real. Three years without directing and producing almost entirely animated. The problem comes in that since there the actors no longer nonsense create them in pixels. I.e., if we have the senseless idea of creating something that does not exist is very well used animation techniques to achieve this but rebuild Jolie when you to the authentic side wearing a maya and stuck balls is an absurdity. You spend money, spend time and get a false version of a real actress.I will not remove merit. Technology has advanced much in these years. Some characters are very real but still have that hyper-realist unfocused halo both upset of creations by computer. In nothing we can enjoy films made entirely by a computer and maybe we don't need nor generate them previously with actors who knows! Can I return to have Connery Bond making or watching movies starring James Dean hence there will be limits and surely if there will be some that another row for image rights. Anyway perhaps Beowulf wasn't prepared to be released yet. Movies with aesthetics as powerful as 300 or Sin City any viewer can not escape you the question: not would have been able to do is otherwise better? Apart from the technical aspects that can be, without doubt, laudable as questionable, I must say that we we have a film entertaining, accurate and well raised. Its raw material (an Anglo-Saxon epic poem of 6th century comparable to our Cid but with dyes of fantastic adventure closer to Tolkien is actually only the basis of the adventure is its fidelity to the 3182 verses that compose quite low) is not bad. Beowulf is a warrior tanning in the fight against monsters and demons who comes to a quiet village hit by the curse of Grendel, a demon that has the little healthy habit of invading the room where villagers celebrate their holidays and z eating occasionally a few. (After ending he gets charged with killing their mother 8más than anything because an angry mother is worse than one minor demon) but when it comes to the beast doesn't seem to be what I expected to find and the hero must decide on its principles and grow his fortune, his legend or both. Obviously actions and situations that are generated are really topical and no surprises or on the final outcome or on acts of the Warrior because as I have already mentioned to Zemeckis that actually puts are pixels and it shows a little.Indeed, with so many computerized orgy we have forgotten to say that Beowulf was already brought to the film. Specifically in nonsense with the same title, starring Christopher Lambert. Later Gerard Butler (Leonidas returns to the attack) which ended with the monster in Beowulf Grendel and clear, a next premiere television called Grendel.En summary Boewulf can be seen but a little disappointed. |
2,113 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3217 | Francisco Bellón | Barcelona (Un Mapa) | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Barcelona (A map) is a dissertation failed on modern life in a big city, but that allows to enjoy the performances of actors of the stature of Josep Maria Pou, Núria Espert, Rosa María Sardà and María Botto | There are few filmmakers around the world that are able to offer a new movie every year, and no doubt the clearest example and known is that of Woody Allen. But in the Spanish film we also have a filmmaker capable of carrying out a feat worthy of the Hercules himself. It's the Barcelona director Ventura Pons, which in 2007 was already premiered La life abysmal, and now offers us his new work, Barcelona (A map).Six characters, contemporary Archetypes of urban solitude, are found in an old flat in Barcelona's Eixample. An old couple, her brother and three realquilados, a woman who teaches French, a guard and a pregnant Argentine girl. All of this is divided into five big scenes, each of them being a conversation between two characters. Barcelona (A map), is a film whose only asset is their characters, their feelings and emotions, which, although it has great appeal, is also equally dangerous if you don't have a solid and occasionally brilliant screenplay as a backup. And unfortunately, this happens to new work by Ventura Pons, which is based on a script sometimes something flimsy that enters nonsensical ramblings and nonsense about life in a big city problems. In justice, it must be said that there are some great scenes that outperforms the rest, and is the star Josep Maria Pou and María Botto. The weaker of all is that has as protagonists to Núria Espert and Paul Derqui.Barcelona (A map) is a dissertation failed on modern life in a big city, but that allows to enjoy the performances of actors of the stature of Josep Maria Pou, Núria Espert, Rosa María Sardà and María Botto. Only to see the duel between Pou and the Sardà it is worth going to see the new film by Ventura Pons. |
2,114 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1743 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Man to man | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Boring dissertation on ethics and moral values that remains in a reductionist prospect of cultures confronted not by the supremacy of science but by the glitz of the show. | The naturalistic scientism is a weak film genre, but has survived to hard-working tapes between the melodramatic and grossly documentary base. Da same as the founding premise of the film is the survival of a few macaques in Borneo or the desire to deal with faith and science, metaphor and pure logic. Anthropology of kindergarten, exoticism of travel magazine paper couché, simiesca caricature of a script that could have given more case that had not wanted to insist on Affairs of so little interest to a modern Viewer, alien to these darwinismos of operetta, to these files facilones where the clash of two cultures resembles the languid mating of two koalas.That the link lost and miraculously recovered for public display has hook to have produced a film with more sobriety, less stereotyped, much more interested in the moral distress of some characters in the loggerhead Didactics of a scarcely credible scientist and an anomalous situation, between the exotic and Plast. If this hybridization of epithets strain.There's more: is maníquea in their approach; naive in his solucionario and, above all, flat in what proposed, even though the galas exhibits are turgid and it seems that we are witnessing a magna opera, something incontrovertibly important.Man to man testifies that is soft to well done, but boring film. And the torpor is so enormous that one abandons the interest to find sense to this predictable and very vulgar sunset scene, by moments, it seems a Sunday sermon on the pre-eminence of the Catholic moral values (they flatten that flatten, go through where you pass) that a streamlined and argumentativamente attractive trip to the human heart, which appears to draw it in the first minutes of the film (the hunting of the Pygmies) they delude and lead to expectations that are later hidden by a montage delinquent, slow, an inefficiency appalling because a half-hour of screening all interest mechanisms are disabled and start one to look at the clock (what terrible thing in the film) and hope that the time passes quickly and we soon leave to pick up to the first unsuspecting bystander and entrust to it, without doubt, our conclusions. "Won't you, stay at home". "Not her rent on dvd: ask Babel or any modern Edition of strangers on a train with extras and all that".Go to Lynch and her man elephant, which speaks of the same (say) but more twisted and lucidly. |
2,115 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1123 | Elena Suárez | Apocalypto | 4 | 5 | muchocine | When a movie makes you forget you're in a movie theater and almost gives you the feeling that you who are fleeing for his life, is that this movie is good, separate controversies. | It seems that all film touched by the hand of the actor before and now director Mel Gibson comes with controversy. It was the case with the controversial "the passion of Christ" and now returns to our screens with Apocalypto, which some try to brand racist.The main issue is that the film is, above all, a story of action and, in any case, I think you try to submit an essay on the causes of the decline of the great Mayan Empire (and not the desapación of civilization maya as I read in some articles). As well, however, the data showing the narrative are not false, namely; the Mayans practiced human sacrifices (extirpations and beheadings) and even the autosacrificios (drilling of some parts of the body to bleed as well). Thus, believed to feed the gods, something which was necessary for the man alimentase, in turn, of the products created by the gods. It is also true that in the last period of the Empire the population was divided into independent provinces and, therefore, with various political, administrative and military bodies. What follows the struggles between various provinces was something feasible. Nor is is very clueless when it tells us that had excasez of natural resources and the population was becoming ill (is one of the theories more accepted by anthropologists to explain the decline of this great Empire). what no speak of progress demonstrated the Mayans in subjects such as mathematics or astronomy? Therefore not because it would not bring anything to the story, it was simply not necessary. I say that this is a movie and not a documentary of the Nathional Geographic. What displays a bloody picture of the Mayans? Therefore neither more nor less bloody than most of the civilizations in the 15th century. Do you, think perhaps, that all Spaniards were dedicated to colonize Islands and kill natives? Do as Spanish I shocked me everytime I see a film about Hernán Cortés? (and more when the British massacred even more but nothing is said).That said, that he thought it necessary, Apocalypto (Greek meaning "I revealed") is a great action movie, that Yes, with a high content of violence (not in vain, speaks to us of the kidnapping of a village, his subsequent torture and humiliation and, above all, the courage of a man to save his family from death). Just as in the passion of Christ dialogues are produciran in the native language according to the historical and geographical situation, in this case, the Yucatec maya; However, the image will charge much more emphatically that the word latter being used with discretion but with intensity.Are careful in detail the scenery as well as physical adaptation of the actors within the geographical environment (in fact, many of them are natives of Mexico); If to this we add that the faces of the actors are not widely known, the great integration of elements make us feel history with more realism.In summary, when a movie makes you forget that you are in a movie theater and almost gives you the feeling that you who are fleeing for his life, it is that this movie is good, separate controversies. |
2,116 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2622 | Plissken | Desmembrados | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The budget was not precisely the Transformers, but the sympathy of the whole makes it forgive all, between laughter and handful of popcorn | If you have worked in one of those large corporations who are concerned that the employee kept his motivation based on annual trips to strengthen the spirit of team rather than pay you more, the starting point of Desmembrados will be very familiar: a diverse group of employees of an arms company on a bus headed for an exciting weekend in Central Europe where will learn the value of camaraderie and cooperation with snowballs Paint. Really idyllic, if it were not for the questionable operations camp location, in the heart of the Balkans. A place say little suitable for practices of tyre and the guerrilla because there always are better players than you. And of course, do not use painting precisely.Christopher Smith, the author of the Creep failed, register within the genre and directed quite a few doses of messing with success what it looks like a cross between Deliverance and The Office. The characters do not pass the pure cliché, but are inevitably fun from the inept leader of the expedition (always solvent Tim McInnerny) until the black secondary topic (maiden Babou Ceesay), passing through the druggie, the ball, the brave, the Raritan or the cynical smartass. Oh, and two "ladies of company" of Eastern Europe, of course. All we have seen already die in similar productions, and it won't be here the exception, but the British touch of humour and hilarious scenes as the trap for bears (classic and effective gag), the effects of hallucinogenic mushrooms or the flashbacks with the possible explanations to the threat that surrounds them get Severance not be another "mata-mata" of the lot, but one of the fun, that worth seeing.In the technical aspect, the truth, and apart from the usual effects of makeup, little to tell: photography normalita pulling to cumbersome and music that goes unnoticed, except for the right song at the end. Note that the budget was not precisely that of Transformers, but the sympathy of the whole makes it forgive all, between laughter and handful of popcorn.A 7, ideal for a summer movie night. |
2,117 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2572 | Tito Chinchan | Pathfinder, el guia del desfiladero (1987) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Original film about a kid whose family is murdered by the Vikings and decides to avenge either way it. With that childish taste in films that have more than 20 years, we have a nice story for a tedious afternoon. Recommended with reservations. | Taking advantage of the passes Pisuerga Valladolid, and they premiere a remake of this Norwegian film opted to Oscar, I have thrown resource and I've seen nothing less than Veiviseren. By the way, do you remember the Yulupuki grandfather? Does not leave in the movie, if that notes us that Lapland it is cold. That certainly. I have to say that I'm getting used to see before major productions, those which are the source of inspiration for directors with little desire to pay for a writer. First it was the lion of Sparta (the 300 Spartans), and 300. And now this one.The film is about a Sami community which is attacked by a few Vikings. After exterminate his family, only is I live a kid, ending in another community, which is forced to flee. The young can the thirst for revenge and decides to stand against the invaders.The thing has not been bad, but the truth is that it seems that it has caught me too resabiado. I.e. If this catches me at age 12, corro by a bow and I mess to kill Icelanders to arrows. But over the years, and with the eye used to great effect, since I know little. The story is very linear, perhaps too, with characters that appear in the life of the main character one by one and without apabullar him. Very little real, although it is not poorly resolved. The action is very realistic, with fight scenes that seemed real and very believable situations. The actors do not seem to all professional, but gives by far the pego. Soundtrack seems it didn't, and the Vikings locker room seems removed from the remains of Matrix.Resumiendo, original film about a kid whose family is murdered by the Vikings and decides to avenge either way it. With that childish taste in films that have more than 20 years, we have a nice story for a tedious afternoon. Recommended with reservations. Many consider cult film, what does that which visione it has to be.Besitos.P.D: That lasts the life of the Sami. |
2,118 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/872 | Pablo López | Casino Royale | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The strong point of this film is not fairly Campbell or Haggis, but Craig. | This is the story of a resurrection. The resurrection of a saga that, as the genre of the western in their times, was starting to degenerate and not to take seriously to itself. And the man who unwittingly, became the incarnation more faithful of a myth for many years.This is the story of Casino Royale, which since its inception received much criticism since the election of the new Bond to the need that this novel to adapt. They were dark times for the production (of course with Tarantino and Brosnan interested in the project, few things could paint better), but capeó them with great dignity. Then came the day of the premiere.Casino Royale has what the three latest James Bond tapes left by the way: a history plausible (into what that means in the Bond saga) with an actor that lives up to. James Bond has always been a jerk, misogynistic, sexist, sarcastic, sobrado and thousand nicknames again, but, being the first British spy adventure, would be different and only major details on the agent. And so it is.Martin Campbell curra is a very successful and effective, discreet, direction that leaves all the weight in the action, a very well done, very well shot action and what the film is in its fair measure. Ojiplático I was to see that Paul Haggis was also amidst the screenplay for this film, a dash of something more notable than previous (and much earlier) delivery, but without us, that James Bond at the end and after all we all know that he is James Bond and can not be asked del olmo pears. But, although he could have become so, the strong point of this movie not be fairly Campbell or Haggis, but Craig.Un Bond much more visceral, physical, direct and without compromises, in short, a more humane Bond is which appears to us in this film, where we learn why Bond is thus where are all their deadbolt, customs, actions, thoughts. a kind of 'James Bond Begins' that brings us closer to the person than the myth. A human Bond shown close, sensitive, concerned and sincere. but little long.Eva girl gorgeous Green Bond illuminates the screen everytime appears, especially with those wonderful (although somewhat rambling) fighting linguistic facing Bond and Vesper. Mads Mikkelsen creates one of the best bad Bond in the series, without artifice 'Dominator of the world', simply of ricachón terrorist, who like all the rich, the more has more wants, with their problems, their plight and their shenanigans.Another characteristic of the 007 movies aspect are the credits and the songs that accompany it, where in this film there is also a change, because they aren't a Bond titles to use, but are cool a lot also, and Chris Cornell song I love, is not a Bond song to use, but as I'm not tired of repeating in this article. This is not a Bond film to use.Ultimately, and to end this article, a film much more close and understandable James Bond in a way because it teaches us why Bond is so, but certainly opens a new avenue of action for later sequels that revitalises the saga, that lately I was in cardiac arrest. |
2,119 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2967 | Rafa Delgado | El ilusionista | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Tape whose only positive points are Paul Giamatti (great as always, the rest as if they pass out there...) and the technical aspect, to rise to the occasion. | Tape whose only positive points are Paul Giamatti (great as always, the rest as if they pass by there.) and the technical aspect, to rise to the occasion.The address fails miserably to such an extent that the history is borrosamente outlined on the screen; one does not know what they are trying to tell us until well into the hour and a quarter duration. And his screenplay, cheater until but not power, not helpful at all.Rather disappointing, although it can be seen and, at least, into what it should be, it is entretenidilla and "magical" sequences are quite attractive to the eye. |
2,120 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2876 | Bruji | La sombra de la sospecha | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The shadow of suspicion, however, does not have the capacity to surprise, factor essential and inherent to all good thriller. | The new production of Michael Douglas can be summed up in just five words: nothing new under the Sun. Extremely attractive in its initial, careful with the technical details and remarkable approach to interpretive level, the shadow of suspicion, however, does not have the ability to surprise, factor essential and inherent to all good thriller. On the contrary, Petievich novel seems to be aimed, on many occasions, to underestimate the Viewer. Kiefer Sutherland, brilliant. Who saw the bodyguards (the old things, to me I loved) will recall that Kevin Costner was the best in his role because had worked to protect the life of the President of the United States. When his seductive partner lets you fall "to the presi they beat him a shot", he responds, without flinching, "that it was not in their turn". Does the magic of cinema has wanted that, years later, we discover that who was on duty that day was none other than the very same Michael Douglas.El veteran actor? and also producer of this movie - will introduce us to the world of elite bodyguards, grouped around the secret service, with the Special Mission to ensure the life of the American leader and the first lady. A very interesting approach, among other reasons, the amount of work these professionals must have current date; but, quickly lose its appeal to the step to an intended plot, in many moments, to underestimate the Viewer. It is not too credible, for example, that an experienced agent of the security forces, with more than 25 years at the service of "Her Majesty", devoted to spread to the four winds a hit of information that has come from a foolproof confidant who provides from more than ten, and would endanger the life of the President. Aspect so unlikely to know that the highest levels of the secret services, to know that there is "a mole" among them, taken as a single measure of security polygraph, to detect who is the traitor. And no more credible point to Barranquilla traffickers or former agents of intelligence services Soviets as possible interested in the death of a timely American President. True it is that enemies not lacking to this country, but sounds like a joke in year 2.006 channelled these paths the script. Screenwriter Nolfi, based on the novel by Gerald Petievich, (which was bought by 20Th Century Fox, before being published in order to this film) stated in an interview on the occasion of the premiere of the film in the USA, "who had tried to make the absolutely true story". It must be so, that did not happen nothing better than writing a culminating sentence to be pronounced by one of the characters in the story: "In 141 years, is the first time that there is a mole in the American secret services". Phrase is not at all uncertain, if we take into account that according to research of true and famous Attorney of New Orleans, which picked up Oliver Stone in one of his movies, there would have been a mole but a herd in the 1960s and with regard to the assassination of JFK. A phrase that, knowing the controversial history of the above-mentioned filmmaker, is ridiculous. As ridiculous as they are mobile which has "bad" this bad thriller, personal squabbles that arise between the two protagonists because of a woman named Silvia, ultimately resulting is called Cindy (thing that bothers the "pijoteros" who realize everything), or the love affair between Douglas and Basinger. The latter, two monsters of the big screen, myths of cinema of the 1980s, which complemented Kiefer Sutherland, who already made their first steps by the same decade with what "Today is a good day to die", the cast line mortal; and with Eva Longoria, an important revelation, camera, last minute. Really, I don't know what kind of public will provide for the shadow of suspicion. Certainly not to the followers of the "political thriller"--and it has been--who not take more than ten minutes to find out the plot. Only the great writers and filmmakers in the history of Hollywood have been able to deceive the most clever Viewer. Some of them, because they were brilliant really. Others, because they were based on accounts of the Queen of crime, Doña agate. In any case, the novel, the screenplay and the film that today we are dealing with, are light years from all of them. Nothing new under the Sun. |
2,121 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1900 | Rafa Ferrer | El Efecto Mariposa | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A film of a surprising theme arriving tired with so much paranoia. | Some say that "experiments better make them at home and with soda." "just in case", and in this case cannot be more accurate, that there are things like, which they are interested and that you feel to see her in this film saying!WOW GO IDEA MOST ORIGINAL! and I have even come to compare it with another film that had me a season quite blown away (rather than anything about the issue of the temporary paranoia) called "Donnie Darko".However there are times that it plays to loop the loop, this triple somersault without network that, forgive me I'm going again to the popular wisdom "what little like and how much angry" and here is what you get back so many times becomes tired or angry greatly to the Viewer.I say that the screenplay is excellent, (unless some other lagoon) that the subject seems quite right, but perhaps some situations are somewhat forced, maybe it is that I'm going to me more or it is expected this movie something different and see that when I go to see a film class I usually schedule and not leave the outcome to influence my opinion, but. This time has not been so.Also if that would like to add you that tape out of absolute protagonist Ashton Kutcher (Yes, the child that was forró do gilipollescas comedies and who now goes by there boyfriend of Demi Moore that are 20 years apart! there is na!) that I frankly falls as a kick in the part low belly! because imagine!Anyway, go synthesizing, they are not hours and I have still some little thing that make here.A film of a surprising theme arriving tired with so much paranoia. |
2,122 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3444 | Patri | El último show | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Death is present throughout the film but not in a tragic way, but with some sadness, resignation and perhaps a reflection of how he took the imminence of his own death. | The last Show is the farewell of Robert Altman, shortly after finishing and when this film had not yet been released died. He already knew that he was dying, and it shows by the theme chosen for the film and the tone, between comic and sad. Death is present throughout the film but not in a tragic way, but with some sadness, resignation and perhaps a reflection of how he took the imminence of his own death.The film is set during the last broadcast of a radio program that has spent 30 years in antenna and broadcasts live from the Fitzgerald Theater. It is a program to the old-fashioned American radio, with musical performances and ads cantandos. But not only will see how broadcast programme but also what happens behind the scenes, both comic and dramatic situations that affect all those who are there in one way or another.In some moments for the viewer who even knows this scene of the radio as it is my case, you can become a little boring, but in general the film are well raised and have some good times.There is a good cast of actors, as it is customary in the films of Altman, stands out above all Meryl Streep, whom I had never heard singing and here do really well. I liked it so much Kevin Kline, for me the best character in the movie, is a role of a type which supposedly is responsible for the safety of the theatre, but rather it seems that you are there penalty or friendship, it is a disaster and a very rare type, always dressed in clothing from the 50. also featured Woody HarrelsonJohn C. Reilly, Lily Tomlin, Tommy Lee Jones, Virginia Madsen, and Lindsay Lohan, that I did not like anything, found me something sobreactuada above all at the end. The last Show will not go down in history, but serves as a good director farewell, and to see her Gets a good time, even though you do not like the country. |
2,123 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1902 | Francisco Bellón | Tuya Siempre | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Best of yours always are interpretations of a brilliant cast which include Flora Martínez, Nancho Novo and José Coronado | Wrong begins with a film if one has the feeling of something already seen five minutes around him on the head. A good old dog, cinematically speaking, is able to smell the unpleasant feeling even with only read a small synopsis of the story. And the truth is that Tuya Siempre, which means return to the cinema of Manuel Lombardero ten years after in arms of the Madura women, is an example that perfectly illustrates our theory.It is a story that portrays the low-life of a Spanish city in the mid-1980s. Lola (Flora Martinez) and Alfredo (Rubén Ochandiano) are a couple to survive carrying out small thefts. When the police arrested Alfredo, he meets Caesar (Andrés Gertrúdix), who grateful for help in the cell gets him a job at a local jazz Lola. In this local meet a large number of disturbing characters, such as Horacio (Nancho Novo) or Manuel Gay (Jose Coronado). The main fault of Tuya Siempre is the lack of originality and freshness of its history. The script falls on many topics, and the film is full of situations already very tired. However, the film is well armed, has a solid packaging, and has some good moments, as if they were small oasis for smart viewers.The bright picture of José Luis Alcaine, which gives the film of the texture indicated to his history and his music deserves a special mention. Best of Tuya Siempre are interpretations of a brilliant cast which include Flora Martínez, Nancho Novo (rather than deserved its award in Malaga) and José Coronado. |
2,124 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/267 | Alvaro Oliva | Las colinas tienen ojos | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A good movie, quite hard for most, which meets the expectations and that rises above the rest of remakes and genre films | Again comes another remake, although I have to say on this occasion had many eager to see the proposal by Alexandre Aja, the trailer for "the hills have eyes" gave a very positive sense and gave us hopes of seeing a film that we kept in tension and that was not a mere commercial product that seized the pull of the original. Because once vista, I can confirm my sensations, since the proposal of this French director is a great film that will delight fans to this type of product. While it is true that the original Wes Craven I liked a lot, I have to say I don't remember too much, as the years pass, so I will leave the comparisons for when has more fresh. Taking the new version as the only, Aja presents an argument that we may be familiar, as it tells the trip of an American family trying to reach California, across the desert, decided to follow the advice of a villager and take a shortcut. From this moment that attractive Road will become his greatest nightmare, as they will have an accident and instead of aid will come another type of service. Do you sound argument, no? If the family we replaced her with a group of friends, will have the history of "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre", "Km 666", "House of wax" and a long etcetera. This approach comes strengths who plays Aja, among which includes a portrait of the characters, and above all a mise en scene very own, maintain the tension and transmit us unpleasant which is the situation they are experiencing and his impotence. One of the best sequences is the first serious attack on the caravan, in which Aja shows almost all the harshness and brutality of the situation, I do not know if by the uproar that could mount and if it is illegal, came me to mind another apex of evil that could have elevated a degree over the madness of the situation. After this sequence characters have to enter more action and try to resolve the difficulties and challenges that have arisen.Aesthetics, music, effects, locations and others is something that have been able to choose very rightly, that introduces us to this unhealthy, dusty world that was created after the nuclear tests. Not everything is outstanding because there are actions of the characters are somewhat absurd and even ridiculous, rub the cliché, and that do raise the intelligence of the American people (in this case), because they decide to do things that no one will, even when in such situations as atrocious. In short a good movie, quite hard for most, which meets the expectations and that rises above the rest of remakes and genre films that abound both on our boards lately. Finally say that they are already preparing the second part, which will be another new revision that Wes Craven was in 1985. |
2,125 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2385 | Yul B. | Transformers | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The amount of CGI effects and history of?Transformers? stirred in me the feeling of seeing a movie without a soul. The art takes it into the visual, but does not transmit anything authentic in its plot. All about topics and clichés that seek the answer always the Viewer. | What meaning you dais you the word? entertainment?. Think for a moment.Do if we get us a dictionary of the Royal Academy of the Spanish language, and look for this term, find the following definition:? action and effect of amuse or entertain?. Not to get anything clear, is not it?. Okay, we are still trying.Do do do if you locate the word? entertain?, said the following:? fun, recreate the mood of someone?. This is going to be long, so I abrevio; If we are pulling linguistic meanings we finally reach the concept clear that entertainment is a feeling of pleasure produced by a cause external or internal, perceived through the senses. Come on, that let you with your guy or your girl is entertainment.Thus entering a spiral of never-ending, because moving that definition to the world of the film could be argued emphatically that the same film can clearly produce a distinct sense of fun in one or another Viewer, i.e. may or not to entertain them, according to their personal circumstances, including the age, and their ways of being and thinking.Come on, with this stuff that I'm releasing you mean that my concept of applied entertainment to?Transformers? iba by the following sensitive paths: special effects to cut off breathing + history without topical and moderately intelligent. Which would have made him enter the section of film? good? (excellence is not readily available).And sure that many of you will be agree with me with this requirement, many others will give more importance to the CGI effects that history, and others more to history rather than fireworks.The fact is that, in my opinion, this binomial is has failed. And I start to dissect the filet here.I begin by what everyone called more attention and that most us has sold. I can say with absolute confidence and conviction that this film is the best that has been done to date in CGI effects.The accuracy in the details of the Transformers is impressive. I had never seen as much mastery at recreate a mass of iron with a flexibility without limits and at the same time genuine 100%. Best of all is the presentation of the Autobots, a puntazo the scene of the Hideout in the garden, and an explosion of hallucinates the battle end, which is a visual and sound of mastodónticas proportions orgy.What I would have liked is to delight me pleasantly with those details, not only during the process of transformation, but also in his robotic State, because the gigs that have stuck in ILM has been milk (18 hours to make each frame), and deserved a greater pause in its contemplation. But I understand that if everything had been slower had slowed down the film's gruesome way and would not be a film brand Bay. The scenes to slow and the close-ups of the Transformers at rest are almost all that let us see the Majesty of a job? multimedia? that verges on excellence. Another but is the Bay to move the camera. In other films, you can give the feeling of greater reality but in this case it does lose the approach to both Autobots and Decepticons clash, and the clash of their structures. Sometimes not sure who is on the side of one or the other (except Optimus Prime and Bumbleee whose colors are very characteristic).By the way, according to the press kit they gave us, was consulted over the Internet the Transformers fans on his new design of production for this film, and apparently gave the go-ahead. So that now not be may complain if his metamorphosis is not the original, i.e. If they are transformed into different objects to those who originally were. Except that has consulted 30 creatures forofas nothing else, which would be almost a crime after a hoax.Do and the last but very important: the ability to surprise at these so amazing advances in CGI is lost completely with both promotional trailer? Ripper?.Because I have clear that this is the adjective? Ripper?. The policy? hype? It continues today with the blockbusters has the huge disadvantage that destroys and kills any sense hiperorgásmica that you can feel in front of this show. If not it managed a cinema blog, next thing that would see these films before its release are few trailers that trumped on TV a week before appearing on our billboards because I go? Virgin? to this preview in images of?Transformers? and me meo taste. A pity.And now to the tricky history.I know that I have asked much to Michael Bay; knowing his film would that you have thought beforehand that this filmmaker cares argument which I am fishing. Nothing only just you a fairly sustainable plot for adornala with cliperas, strenuous images to the limit. That style so shabby, but effective at the box office, he has been so far. And sure that with?Transformers? encumbrará you as the master of the acción-ciencia - fiction. With a godfather as Spielberg did not surprise me, they are already doing.The bug that I made is believe me those views that I read somewhere that they claimed emphatically that this film is the best Bay has done in his career. You can do so it, but his style. Do I believe 100% that the history of?Transformers? Yes could have been much more than, it could have been moderately intelligent without being complex. Simplicity does not mean the imbecility.In this film has fallen into the trap of sustaining in a script that has been written seeking the appearance of complexity, with the interlaced bird of frames, but that finally turns to how easy, without risking: the topicazo of the boy half graceful graciosete with scarce economic resources that makes everything possible to get a perrillas to buy a car and have possibility of approaching the chicha unattainable dreams buenorrato which she loves expensive cars and the guys with money that are guaperas but no brains. And in the end her get, after forced clashes with its natural charms (and a bit of action of course).Or to the topicazo of the battalion of marines formed literally by 4 soldiers which seem to 300 when they fight, and with a vomitous American pride (missed the detail of the USA flag). I like the Hollywood cinema but not patriotic.Or also the topicazo of the Cabinet crisis that turns to superespecialistas analysts that leave slips another buenorra egghead and a callus of hacker programs unimaginable to the decipher them themselves signals that any Government specialist has managed to reveal.Is the touch of humor prints Shia LaBeouf to the Ribbon, which is the only one that is worth something in the cast that conforms liberating?Transformers?. I could see it in V.O. and I can confirm that this kid is the perfect successor to friend Harrison Ford in the Jones franchise. Save the movie in the most critical plot moments. Anthony Anderson also left their label.Jon Voight is not credible as Minister of defense in the United States.UU. Rachael Taylor and Megan Fox are two chocolates which lack liquor. Josh Duhamel looked like he was on vacation in the Montesito and was engaged from the face with quick-change robots to relax. And John Tunturro best not say anything, to see if I offended the clowns; one thing is that this film is a humorous touch and another thing is that desmadre with the performance of some.I am sure that the Spanish dub will save from burning more than one of these actors.And after all this tell me what you expect if Bay?. Because a Yes?Transformers? It had been regarded as one of the cinematographic events of this year would be because it is a round film. And, I am sorry to say that it is not.?The wars? or the Indiana Jones saga are round films as for entertainment because they combine to perfection special effects (for its time) with attractive stories, ably developed despite their topics, that keep you with our eyes open each and every one of the minutes that last. That is what I was looking for, taking into account that he spent there the hand of final Spielberg.En, and resuming the binomial that I talked about at the beginning of the criticism, the amount of CGI effects and history of?Do Transformers?, as I have told you, resulting in me feeling to see a film without soul. The art takes it into the visual, but does not transmit anything authentic in its plot. All about topics and clichés that seek the answer always the Viewer. Me not me has entertained enough.Sorry, so can not say that the film is good. Or tell me, when give it something, you look more in the packaging or gift?. What matters in the end is the gift, the other is only dazzling role.Does 90% of viewers in the age between 7 and 17 years old, and some talluditos Strip, fliparán in colors with?Transformers?. It is an exemplary product of the current film in which live: business and more business. Make money with palomiteras films to continue making more palomiteras films, and thus continue to live in this industry. The hopeful in finding something else in?Transformers? knowing that there was enough material to give a distinctive touch, we will stay to tables. We will be enchanted fireworks but always consider that grace lacked to launch them. |
2,126 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/837 | Tito Chinchan | Mi vecino Totoro | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The drawings are charming, the musiquilla of chord and the characters are wonderful. | Well, we are back to the load with another film of Mr Miyazaki, which should be already signing the monthly check that sends me for the praise and praise him I am. I believe that it is the only foreign film director which I are name and sure of which more films I've seen.The film is a family of two girls and a father that move to the rural Japan. MOM is sick, in a nearby sanatorium, and girls want to with all his forces this gets good. Arriving at the House, they discover that it is inhabited by spirits of the forest, so they have to expel. They then discover a giant and furry, Doll has more mouth than body, and that when he shouts the wind is born. The breast then catches a cold and girls cry. And suddenly get a gato-autobús and all laugh and appear a few titulitos in Japanese and stops the recording. I don't even imagine that the film why certain critics drink winds can be summarized in this, it must be the prologue.Therefore, the film is not that. Luckily, it is short. Come with the good news, it is precious. The drawings are charming, the musiquilla of chord and the characters are wonderful. The strength and vitality of the girls is intoxicating, and messing with Totoro is cane. The parents of girls want to much and everything is the ideal world that which we love to take to fill factory and progress. The trouble is that nothing happens throughout the film. There is a central story, but that Miyazaki is telling us their stuff, but nothing that we hook. The thread in the countless ads could throw by Telecinco and not perderiamos.In short, if you're a fan of Miyazaki or child (for example, that you've swallowed of raccoons) is highly recommended. If you liked spirited away and you think that it is more of the same, you ass. I personally recommend with reservations, that it is a little defraudante you finish and it has been nothing.Miyazaki, are what give me thief?Besitos.P.D: I think that it is the kind we should see many times to delight with the images and characters.Pd2: The inclusion of soot balls (converted in not is what forest) is nice.P.D.3: The scene in which the girl chases invisible stuffed animals are very funny.P.D.4: to eat Totoro? Because with this mouth I don't think that you eat little. And imagine the cacas lie, that horror. |
2,127 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1546 | Jose Contreras | La vida de los otros | 2 | 5 | muchocine | I know very well that the Stasi violated the privacy of the Germans, and I know that the mafia vendettas are perverse. But do not want a director between judging with his Catechism of values. I want a director that I penetrated in these Hells mojigatas uncensored. | Take for example the godfather. Any director of middling in charge of that history would have sentenced to Corelone, viewers learn to be good children, or that we will not conferred to him, the Director with the mafia. Coppola dares with the morlaco, is identified with the mafia until the end. It is one of the greats. Not because you choose chords beautiful on the soundtrack or place the camera on a place more chuli than others. It does not help anything continue reviewing the technical specifications of the Godfather hanging praise, we are not going to find the explanation that makes it so tremendous.This step gives Coppola is which does not give the German film. Hirschbiegel made a film about Hitler for the sole purpose of not understanding Hitler, Henckel von Donnersmarck analyzes a plot of the stasi with the sole intention of which we do not understand what I felt a stasi agent.An expert in espionage of the eastern Germany receives commissioned to monitor a theatre author and her lover. After click throughout the House the spy discovers that two victims of the system are in the background and that the Minister himself abused his power to obtain the favors of the woman. From that moment you change your attitude and collaborates with them.The problem is that since then the character ceases to have meaning. The character faces against the regime that keeps and the own work done, which sounds very good for a viewer today, but does not tell us anything about what happened in the Germany then. If the public were Catholic, the director would have filled the protagonist of crucifixes. It is somewhat quick to win over the audience. But lack the audacity that more than enough in the godfather. I know very well that the Stasi violated the privacy of the Germans, and I know that the mafia vendettas are perverse. But do not want a director between judging with his Catechism of values. I want a director that I penetrated in these Hells mojigatas uncensored.I liked the setting, this eastern Germany tristísima with wallpaper and worn sofas. The beginning is sublime. The protagonist explains his methods to a class to listen to an example of as becomes an interrogation and stays electrizada, as well as the public. |
2,128 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/311 | Tito Chinchan | Monster house | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Peliculón of animation with a good script, very well developed. | A few months ago, passed ahead of a film and it caught my attention a poster. It was this film and the curious who was that depending on from where it us, leaving an image or another. And he watched as the House was eaten to the protagonist. And I said, "this when it comes out, have to do it". But as I have fallen a press by handsome pass, because have seen before the rest of mortals, it, je.The film is a preteen kid called Walters DJ who is obsessed with the neighbor of the House opposite, an old man with bad milk called Nebbercracker. This is feared in the neighborhood, since anything that falls on its plot is seized, including children tricycles. One day, that disappears is the ball of his friend Chowder basketball and when they seek to recover him, the elder dies. From this, are given account that the House has its own life, and that is not friendly. With the help of a small and ingenious friend, they will have to rid the world of such annoying House. By the way, the action takes place on Halloween, that am.Finally a movie that I liked, Alleluia. And that it has everything. I liked the script, given that isn't ñoño or absurd, and has very little moralina. It is a quick action, a short movie and great quality. The kids are not superheroes or anything of the sort, and fall off everything without hardly eat it or drink it. The animation is very good, with many details and very natural. And the plot grows until the apotheosis end, which is memorable. The only issue is that I do not think for children. It is dark, has more than one scare, the bad characters are very bad at the beginning and the end scares (a childish minds). For this reason I think that it is more for a teen audience onwards.In short, a peliculón of animation with a good script, very well developed. |
2,129 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3471 | Oscar Martínez | Rec | 5 | 5 | muchocine | It starts with a strong expectation, continues with a central stage that combines scares and sense of humor, to make an impact with one of the most tense final crescendos and taquicárdicos of horror in recent years. | With the exception of the award for best film, which has deservedly been the particular poetic Odyssey of Tarsem Singh The fall, the great winner of the Festival of Sitges 2007 has been [REC], winner of the award for Best Director, prize for best actress, the audience award and prize of the critics. and Paco Plaza and Jaume Balagueró have signed a truly commendable filmshot as a mockumentary, as in vogue in recent times, where the tension reached unsustainable levels - especially in its second half-that a server for a long time that not experimenting.[REC] tells the story of Angela, a young reporter for a local television, that one night continues with his camera firefighters of Barcelona, with the secret hope to live live a striking fire. But the night elapses extremely quiet. And when they finally receive the call of an old woman who has been locked up in his house, he there is no choice but to follow a group of firefighters during his rescue mission. In the building where the old lady lives, residents are very scared. Too much. Women, enclosed in his flat, shouting some heartbreaking. The firemen destroy the door and followed by Angela and the House, found the semiconscious old woman, surrounded by dozens of cats. Suddenly, the woman launches on a firefighter, biting him savagely, in front of the incredulous fellow and the lens of the camera. It is only the beginning of a long nightmare and a dramatic feature unique in the world: when other firefighters carried the wounded, discover that the only way out of the building is blocked by the authorities. The building has been put in quarantine. It seems a strange virus has spread in the interior.Certainly, [REC] collects many clichés of the horror film, starting with the inevitable reference to the draft of the Blair Witch, as well as certain similarities with 28 days later and clear homages to films like Infernal possession. It is also true that the movie Plaza and Balagueró not scary really, if anything in certain specific passages, and that his formula works more with scares that recreates a visceral horror.But, as well, however, [REC] is to draw the hat.With a hyper-realist style, [REC] wanders between a strong expectation in its initial, truly disturbing stretch, a central stage in which a community of neighbours hilariously feasible enlivened the plot with a relaxed sense of humor that seems to lead to the film in directions not expected to make an impact with a final crescendo - with easy resolution, it must be said - that iscertainly some, one of the most tense and taquicárdicos of horror in recent years.As I said, [REC] does not offer anything new in itself, but is admiring the Plaza and Balagueró ability to combine existing elements forming thereby a new product, Amen for do jump from their seats to all those attending the screening. And it is that Paco Plaza and Jaume Balagueró have signed, conscious or not, a true milestone, an extreme experience that installs the national horror film at some levels never dream so far and hardly surmountable.On another hand, and this as a personal note, do not understand how the prize for best actress has gone to Manuela Velasco which, while it meets more than the purpose of portraying, isn't at the height of the excellent performances of Catherine Keener in An american crime, Rain in I'm to cyborg, but that's Ok, or even Jess Weixler in Teeth. But the real question is. Why not is [REC] at the Oscars, rather than the orphanage?I give a 8'5 out of 10. |
2,130 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3931 | Ana Belén Pacheco | No es país para viejos | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Production, direction and screenplay is the Coens and it shows, especially in the dialogues that are able to get you a smile to their topics and situations are all less comic. | After much meditating I decided that actually I like the Coen brothers when they are serious. If you ask me that the Coen Brothers film I liked but I pestañeo not before saying that death among the flowers because it is violent and appealing equally. In the middle there has been some others that deserve to be seen and treasured in memory as O Brother! (where I discovered that I could laugh with George Clooney and all), the Big Lebowski and Fargo. But if I have to say to what tape looks like its new proposal say it seems a return to the early days, which, as you can deduce after this presentation, it is more to my favorite and certainly thank you.Production, direction and screenplay is the Coens and it shows, especially in the dialogues that are able to get you a smile to their topics and situations are all less comic. But there is also something in the tape that comes closer to the visual beauty of Fargo, a species of onirismo implicit at every level that gives a perfect finish in shades of ochre and Brown.Josh Brolin plays a poor gift anyone who meets in the middle of the desert the remains of an exchange of drugs, all participants are dead (or almost) so decides that a brilliant idea is to take the Briefcase with two million of dollars. An attack by sudden goodness done to return to the place just when the murderer more leisurely, thoughtful and quiet arrives on the scene. A quiet but bloody hunt will begin to recover the money and revenge.It could not finish a critique without making a subsection in its protagonists, although makes it a little less to Bardem, are all brilliant. Tommy Lee Jones has seemed extraordinary, after a season that had just not have greatly appreciated it has compensated outweigh, Woody Harrelson has one of those roles that, not for being short is undeserved, almost dares to steal scenes from his fellow unblinking and well, Javier in her second scene with wives already leaves several things clear to the Viewer without having to open the mouth.That Yes, maybe the murderous botella-arma tape, is so useful that I want one for the bag. |
2,131 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2194 | Ivan Sainz-Pardo | Lost in La Mancha | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A documentary film interesting, heartbreaking, funny, sad, fundamental to really understand that the dreams of the filmmakers, are made and essential for anyone wishing to face the adventure of directing a film professionally. | Terry Gilliam is a film director peculiar, with a couple of great films and several anthological busts. Wonderful "Brazil", "12 monkeys", interesting "fear and Loathing in las Vegas" and "The Fisher King", but certainly his personal Titanic was accidentadísimo filming of "The adventures of Baron Münchausen", where the shooting of the film was on numerous occasions about to cancel, surpassing the budget estimated of unimaginable way and managed to kill harsh penalties. (As already happens earlier in Brazil ended up doubling the initial budget of $ 23 million).Audiences and critics, moreover, gave back, partly due to a regrettable promotion that made a $ 55 million production, to raise barely 4 million. From then on, Gilliam had chest fame director crazy, naive, irresponsible, and cursed. But if the great is hard to beat, as very bad is always surmountable and 12 years later, Gilliam would face one of the shootings calamitous and unfortunate history. Among many other reasons, because filming on Spanish soil which drew nearly 10 years of planning, several unsuccessful attempts of pre-production and search for funding worldwide, was inevitably suspended the sixth day, dragging with them a budget of more than 30 million dollars.This documentary, which only originally was intended as a usual off making, ended up being a single document on the unsuccessful filming of the project "The man who killed Don Quixote".Delay of the actors in the pre-production, failures of communication and organization, a volatile planning and something utopian, disasters and natural weather, aircraft that ruin the shots without remedy, an actor ailing protagonist who ends up leaving due to a double herniated disc Extras onstage without prior testing, pressure on the shoulder of investors and producers of the movie.A document shocking to understand what really hides behind the industry of cinema, the creative process and the real nature of artist faced of the success or failure of a cinematographic work that always depends on, inevitably, too many factors: the weather, the technical team, the artistic, luck, health, insurers, commitment, the divine will.Orson Welles suffered unspeakable in a similar crusade in the face of another version of "El Quijote de la Mancha". As if it were a strange curse, that filming was not completed. First died the main actor in the middle of this and a little later the same director leaving the work unfinished. A documentary film interesting, heartbreaking, funny, sad, fundamental to really understand that the dreams of the filmmakers, are made and essential for anyone wishing to face the adventure of directing a film professionally. |
2,132 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2523 | Berto | Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A movie which although not you can remove the etiquette of entertaining, for my is the weaker of the saga, and glimpse into the series as a great movie, I think that we we have the movie that serves as a link between the development of the previous films. | We have here the almost "eternal" apprentice magician, in a fifth installment originally proposed major changes and challenges. These changes and challenges are directly based on the adaptation of the longest book of all the of the Potter, and seeing the length of the other films this wanted eternal when adapting, although seen so it seems that have opted for the tijeretazo directly to skip chapters and more chapters, to leave only a main plot follow during all the footage. Secondly, the changes relate to that middle adolescence that already has our Harry, now entering full amoriles issues, and which will also finding increasingly more alone and with a character a little more rough the sweetness that distilled at the beginning of the series. All this would be quite well and it would give a breath of fresh air to the saga, but I have to admit that this movie has disappointed me a little. Firstly, to focus only on the main plot of the film, something that wouldn't be too bad, the problem is that when watching the movie, it gives the feeling of many things are left in the dark, in search of a narrative a bit more agile and spectacular, and so a simple example, because now that I'm reading the book in questionthe piece that I read, until their arrival to Hogwarts School are almost 200 leaves in the book, whereas in the film 10 minutes is already coming to such an exceptional College. Secondly, the much-heralded darkness of Harry Potter, which does not become such, simply a couple of voices that stick them to their friends, and a sense of loneliness throughout the entire film, but fails to imbue the character of Harry, which continues to be brave and determined when it is up, and not a step back by many "ghosts" travelling on their thoughtssomething that in the book it is also better spot and looks, but which fails here, because here the only thing dark comes to observe throughout the film, is the use of all keys more off color, very much in the line of what did Alfonso Cuarón in the third installment of the saga, the prisoner of Azkaban, that if that seems really dark in approach than this.Another problem is the use of characters. Some characters appear and disappear as if by magic, and never better art, and it seems that they are simply there to say a couple of appropriate phrases, or simply to do bundle and join the excellent roster of actors. I do not know how to develop his characters in the book, because still not reach that part, but the roles of Bellatrix Lestrange, Nymphadora Tonks and Luna Lovegood simply appear from time to time, and above all the role of Bellatrix, with Helena Bonham Carter playing it, I think it will be a bit more decisive in the next film in the series. As I say, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint are exactly as in the previous films, but a little more creciditos. Only say that the only with something for the future I see the trio's protagonist is Emma Watson, and but at the time, because I think that we we have a new case Luke Skywalker with Radcliffe. The other characters also appear very in passing throughout the film, with the exception of the great Gary Oldman in his role of Sirius Black, without doubt the very best that we see on the screen, together with Imelda Staunton, whose role of the repellent Dolores Umbridge is very accomplished, resulting odious almost from his first appearance, the other characters, as I already mentioned, albeit with much too untapped name, such as for example 3 lines of dialogue that Emma Thompson has throughout the film, the three sporadic appearances, although conclusive for the history of Helena Bonham Carter or even Ralph Fiennes in his role of that which may not be appointed, and that although stands out mythical qualities of bad filmcan't you appear everything which would have to give shape to a role of magician so bad as he would be entitled.With regard to the director, it brings nothing new to the show. While Chris Columbus started the saga and her endowed of the spectacular nature that characterizes him, and then some other director contributed their bit, as for example the great third superbly shot by Alfonso Cuarón, here simply David Yates is dedicated to placing the camera and try to maximum possible levels where you can use some special effect and thus add a spectacle that only with the plane could not be achievedwhich says very little in his favour and showing me that it makes one of the most flat and devoid of personality of the Potter works, and worst of all, is that this chosen this director to shoot next movie, the half-blood Prince. He would only save the beginning of the film, that begins with enough force and gives hopes for a film that will follow this same style all the footage, but can not deceive ourselves in better way, because until the final battle between wizards, that as I said people that if the book has been read is quite faithful to the book, for a viewer accustomed to special effects of the caliber of TransformersPirates of the Caribbean, or Spider-man will seem anything less spectacular. It is fortunate to have been able to take advantage and see the film in Imax format, since those last 20 minutes in 3 dimensions, adding that spectacular of lacks to the film, and that that end is not shot to be exploited in the 3Ds, but hey, if you cannot be both.In short, a film which although not you can remove the etiquette of entertaining, for my is the weaker of the saga, and glimpse into the series as a great movie, I think that we we have the movie that serves as a link between the development of previous films and the end of the sagaIt occurs with these two latest films remaining Harry, in which hopefully recover the narrative agility, better use both the main characters and the unused side long, and regain the strength and even the darkness had already marked in the previous films. |
2,133 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2279 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Comandante | 3 | 5 | muchocine | There are who criticised the documentary as "a love letter to Castro" and I find no passion in the lines of Stone. The dinosaur has soul and here even tenderness, repentances, vices and sins. | dictator, ra. (From the lat. dictatōre [m]). m. and f. In modern times, person he arrogates or receives all the extraordinary political powers and exercises them without limitation legal. m. and (f). person who abuses his authority or is harshly to others.Away from the reflection more banked to the hagiography of the character and historical, Oliver Stone left fiction and undertake the enterprise document life and thinking of the old Cuban leader. This ideological Cookbook not ignores the controversy: like in her role as pamphlet not to the taste of all sides and not even siquier to taste from the biografiado camp which is, at times, under siege, become a star of the celluloid to suddenly, shares with a courageous and complete questionnaire that not censorship Bay of pigs, torture on the islanddissent in Miami, censorship, the new world order, the murder of the validity of Communism or even the cinephiles of the dictator, which seems very interested in classic American movies. There are who criticised the documentary as "a love letter to Castro" and I find no passion in the lines of Stone. In any case, there is an admiration, a sense of the relevance of the work that is being done. Fight the verbal incontinenca of Castro is already an achievement. Domestic intimacy that exudes the film allows the Commander to relax, feel comfortable in the role of absolute character of the tape. All dictators have exacerbated love for his person. Castro is no exception: it is not a megalomania Saddam Hussein-style, but the whole island breathes Castroism and dragged and sweet voice seems that it vagara, as phonetic, piers and squares spectrum so that the people don't forget who reached the revolution and all that here, in Europe the welfare and democracy, we think an old tale told to those who still do not have matured enough to warn the miseries of that culture. Stone is an American seriously ashamed of his homeland: he does not hide, but qualifies that his anti-Americanism is not abstract and freezes the image of Bush sending troops to Iraq, subject Stone criminalizes openly. Full Spanish production, Commander part of thirty hours of tape reduced to 100 minutes of film. There are times that Stone seems intimidated by the academic rigor and the Baroque oratory of the Commander. Others that takes the helm of the words and seems that it knocked out the opponent, but it is false: there is no any round. The boxers, closed Chamber, take ron and smoke cigars, I imagine, cheerful limited partnership. Historical flashes are by far the best of the tape: the arsenal of documentation that has accessed the director shows the history of Cuba and also the history of the world in the 20th century. The revolution is already almost 50 years of success in the island. Castro seems immortal sausage in his red Sweatshirt or its Chief of the militias casaca. The village lives anesthetized by the ideological intoxication of a líder-padre who has literate a people and has put in the path of pure socialism and continuous improvement. Concerned about the destruction of identities and the "monoculture" prefers to have a McDonalds in Havana rather than in New Delhi or, at least, not being too complicit in his word, we understand that there should be none outside the US, that is where there is truly a culture that guardianship and protects those excesses of capitalism. Castro also comes to tell us that the precise revolution of all time worldwide and thus on this premise, he not invests any fraction from time to shave. Those "fifteen minutes a day" are used in tackle solutions to the problems of the people. Case that the dictator had spent those minutes shave equal today Cuba was a member of any democratic organization and its citizenship battle the usual battles of all free States. That is, unemployment, violence, terrorism, housing and education. Populated Beard has been well seen. We see the Commander in love with a big screen where watch movies as La revolution Manda or Rita Hayworth or that Italian, Sofia, said that it was crazy. In the chapter of actors stays with Chaplin and Cantinflas, whose films would be able to see them all again. "The history of first ladies" is ridiculous because politics should not mix with the family. "That life is good with you" said to be Stone and Castro at the end fades into an emotional embrace while Cuba continues its Vertigo of prisons without trial, their elimination of dissidents and that its custom of not hold democratic elections to listen to the voice of the people. |
2,134 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/540 | Jesus Lens | El viento que agita la cebada | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Without being perfect, is very good. And, above all, necessary. As necessary are directors and writers who, like Loach and Laverty, still believe that another world is possible. | When Ken Loach presented his last and committed film in the last edition of the Cannes Festival, not provoked great acclaim among critics moved to the French Riviera. However, when he was awarded the Palme d'Or for best film presented in competition, nor was tainted no one hands to the head.And that may be the best summary of a film "100% made in Loach", with a heavy political burden, starring the village people, village in this case, which is obliged to take decisions, which discusses and defends with passion and vehemence his ideas, which faced the established power, fight, fights, kills and stands firm in his principles and beliefs.To tell part of the story of the IRA, when he was the real Irish Republican Army in the 1920s hard, and for narrating the civil war in which Ireland after the signing of the Treaty of peace with the British was engulfed, Loach and its header, also very committed Paul Laverty, screenwriter taking as protagonists to two brothers who, while they start fighting together, end up taking directions separate and independent in their lives.Personally, Ireland fascinates me. Everything that has to do with the Erin green, from its Celtic cosmogony to its music, its literature, its pubs, Guinness, its landscapes. and its history, of course.A beautiful and tragic history in that the green of the grass, unfortunately, has been usually dyed with blood red. And why a movie like "The wind that shakes the barley" had all the ballots to like me. And I like it. I like the point of view of adopting Loach and Laverty, staying always with a persons foot, rather than tell us the great epics of the recognized heroes and historical leaders. I like the realism that transmit their images, sometimes even too stark. I like the players who choose to play the roles, always so credible and confident in his convictions as tender and fragile in their performances. I like the mix of tenderness and hardness which printed some sequences and the feeling of deja vu that leave the black uniforms, once expelled the English persimmons. And I like the end: terrible, bare, without room for the granting or melodrama.And yet what I had liked in other Loach films, the protagonists in this Assembly and libertarian discussions end up getting tired me. By repetitive and too elongated. And concentrated. The Laverty and Loach want to give voice to all the characters, allowing each to explain their reasons and their point of view is very honest. "But, in the end, the film ends up being too discursive, by many and repetitive situations posed.""The wind that shakes the barley" is one of those movies that, without being perfect, is very good. And, above all, necessary. As necessary are directors and writers, such as Loach and Laverty, still think that another world is possible and that a film camera or a computer keyboard can be a weapon more effective than a kalashnikov or a uzi or both.For that reason, alone already deserve our consideration, respect, admiration and appreciation. |
2,135 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3457 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | El buscavidas | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Undisputed masterpiece of cinema. You can not go more to the point when it comes to settle a headline. | You have perhaps been boxer made that Robert Rossen was a film director with wood from failed Boxer or moving the camera as if he alojase a derechazo in the air or try to knock out the opponent with a good straight to the gut. He was also a Communist. So we have a Boxer and a Communist who desentonaba in the Hollywood glamour, Cole Porter and costumes of fiesta in carpeted rooms, swing and champagne. He was then called by HUAC, the House UN-American activities Committee. Ypacarai director to portray subterranean worlds, marginal júbilos and embocadas lives to disaster had to be a dangerous type. Also in body and soul and the political were not especially sweet: the two come to tell that the world is, by nature, tragic and that as one escalafona in decision-making responsibilities therein more is abandoning ethics and is hence to corruption and to the desasimiento of the noble ideals that marked his idyll with the future and everything good and beautiful life. Rossen down to the ring or eaten offices of nicotine and depressing furniture of political parties for writing his disappointment. The sticks we got in life are not written: are scripts. Called to a notary to give faith of our desolation and saved the testimony in a safe so that someone, thirty years later, check encabronados we were or how unhappy that were our days on Earth. Rossen filming with bad milk so that generations to come attend, impávidas, between the sadness and admiration to his grey guignol, to his costumbrist stamp of deep America that which all American managers talk at some point of his filmography. Rossen is an America of boxers and players of billiards, politicians with large pockets and detachable ethics.The political commitment made him leave the United States, once he refused to give the names of the colleagues of ideological revelries. No talk of John Garfield, with which linked you it short trousers and gloves and sands of the words, this cumbersome area in which those in power do not want to enter for fear of losing it. The politician loses the innocence in his working tour: Starks, a wonderful Broderick Crawford, ends up corrupted, disenchanted, hosted in the same barracks vices and sins himself criticized on foot of a wagon, lacking the oratory with which engañará in the future, but invested of sincerity and convening power. McCarthy did the suitcases. It was recorded in Italy, Spain, Mexico and to the Barbados Islands. The return to the country (1961) was an apotheosis. He returned to dig in the same wounds. The Hustler is an absolute masterpiece. One of the best films in the history of cinema. Without palliatives. What's in this film? Honor perhaps. Life to dry. The field of battle of yesteryear humongous in a modern simulacrum.Low-life smell hot beer, black stale smoke and sweat. Add the curious reader a billiard table and a powerful light that illuminates the, a large group of vocationally idle men and perhaps a props jazz music and we have the perfect setting for a film noir film. If we put a glass of fine glass of mouth broadband well filling of Jack Daniel's or a good malt whisky because then the scene is simply perfect. The lady who long ago that ceased to be so, it escote generous, narrow skirt, painted and very long nails, lurks the game and hoped that their gallant devote him a look, a breath of smoke or a nod accomplice. The life, times, needed eyes, puffs of smoke, winks accomplices if one has lost along the way the esteem and hope that something good can happen. The billiard table, as the sand of the circus as the ring, as the bars of the bars is the quintessence of these low-life.You have to see Jackie Gleason, the fat of Minnesota, moving around the table with her body amazing, move the stick and apparently, at all times, which is going to collapse or that the heart is going to burst you is to attend a master class in how to move a camera and how to make movies. Point. Minnesota Fats is not only the name of a character: is also the mark of a famous and reputed pool stick. There are also in Madrid, told me a friend, a club of billiards with the bombastic and mythological name of Eddie Felson.El Hustler is not only the mythical character of Eddie Felson, the fast, the lightning, a loser, a memorable anti-hero. It is the story of the search for purity, perfection. Gives equal Rossen to give emphasis in the ring or on the pool table: the instinct is the same, the voice is the same. It is a morality of containment, painted in the color of money or the epic of survival or amoral men. Rogues, tahúres, sick of love, disenchanted, villains domestic, suckers and HUSTLER soulless: the dappled fauna Rossen used in that grey theatre which is the the pool table, Mythic territory and superb metaphor of life.Absolutely essential secondary characters: the "raging bull" Jack LaMotta, that makes bartender; George C. Scott as that kind of taco Pimp; Piper Laurie as the self-destructive Lady in love with the loser Felson.Jackie Gleason was never better. Piper Laurie borda. Paul Newman (what risk writing this) the best role of her life. |
2,136 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3976 | Oscar Martínez | La criatura perfecta | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Little you can highlight the perfect creature, with the exception of its Gothic setting. The rest, to forget. | The perfect creature is a co-production between New Zealand and United Kingdom directed by Glenn Standring and starring Dougray Scott, Saffron Burrows, Leo Gregory, Scott Willis, Stuart Wilson, Craig Hall, Robbie characters, Lauren Jackson, Peter McCauley and Glen Drake.La film puts us in an alternative and retro-futurista 1960, where vampires and humans coexist peacefully for over 300 years. But this delicate balance will be broken when a vampire begins to feed on humans, spreading a strange disease similar to rage, threatening peace between the so-called brothers and the rest of society.Little you can highlight the perfect creature's film next Friday to reach our billboards. With a Gothic atmosphere fusion of Underworld and the compass Golden – although its closest analogy would be that of Van Helsing futuristic - the perfect creature is one failed attempt more attracting to the public from the vampire myth.The film is based on the assumption that a 15th century alchemist created vampires while trying to find a vaccine for pests around the world at that time, such as the plague. Vampires, regarded as an aberration in spite of not serotra thing that one more step in the evolution of man, found the cure to these pests and vowed to protect human, forming the so-called Church and becoming themselves Hermanos.Como idea, certainly, is not bad at all, but both the Fund and the form of the perfect creature makes water everywhere, resulting in its Gothic aesthetics only thing salvageable from this tape whose influences range from the aforementioned Underworld and Van Helsing, to titles such as Equilibrium or Ultraviolet: the plot loses all its appeal once it has been raised, presenting us with a succession of archetypal characters played by actors that seem to compete for the award for worst actor of the year, among which one might highlight to a bland Dougray Scottprobably the most bland vampire of recent times.Although, let's be honest, we could say vampire as we could say ukelele sociopath, a contained thirst for blood and a greater physical power are the only signs that point to confirm the nature of undead vampires of the perfect creature. On the other hand, the leitmotiv of Edgar, nemesis of the tape, nor do we have excessive clear in no time, justifying their actions from an illness that he himself has created.That Yes, sequel rather than open, of course.Direct output to DVD product, and little else. |
2,137 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3008 | Naty Buqué | Relámpago sobre el agua | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The film is not a simple reflection on death but the presentation, second by second, of the same death. | Crudísimo film that is installed in the last days of Nicholas Ray - being consumed by a cancer that affects a shred a lucidity that, in this context, it is atrocious - lightning over water (or Nick's movie) is a sort of documentary on the fictionalization of the creation process of a film between Wenders and Ray, that is - that ends up being - this same film. In this sense, the film is an inquiry into movies, the possibilities of film, the limits of fiction.However, the film is not a simple reflection on death but the presentation, second by second, of the same death. To very little of his death, with a body that does not already give to coarse, Ray installs the entire team of filming in his house and shows us the desperate reality of impending death. The filmmaker is obviously very sick, but his lucidity is intact. She lectures, writes, it is doing a film. And he knows that he has to die. In this despair, which does however not fall never into low blows or attacks of hysteria, the film dives us in that infinite sadness.And in addition to classic and unbelievably beautiful levels of Wenders in the city, the film also has bright reflections, both on film and on death, by both managers.Lightning over water is, if not aesthetically outstanding - as it might be expected of a Wenders to the head, but that in this case would have been almost insulting - Yes very intelligent and deeply emotional. Crude, but a gem. |
2,138 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/991 | Jose Luis | Babel | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A spiritual tape that to understand uses several unforgettable images. | A Mexican Nanny in charge of two American children have to decide between do their job or attend the wedding of his only son. A couple of American spouses who walk by Morocco suffer from what appears to be a terrorist attack. A Moroccan pastor is to raise their children. And a young Japanese sordomuda strives to communicate with his father and with his environment, at the same time that is desperately losing her virginity.All this believe it or not is part of a single tape, it's Babel, the third tape in collaboration between the screenwriter Guillermo Arriaga and director Alejandro González Iñárritu and as they threaten will be the last, citing creative differences. Separation artistic that leaves a big challenge to Iñárritu for their upcoming projects alone, without already having the depth, the force and the emotionalism of the greater Arriaga.Y scripts challenge yet, after this third film, in short the most stylized, tidiest, more poignant and although sounds weird to say it, the more hopeful.Both have these stories as a pretext to talk about globalization and the growing lack of understanding between Americans and Mexicans, between the Americans and the potential terrorists, but also between husband and wife, between father and son, between brother and brother.These several story lines that are sliding one between the other, different pace and time, while that history to the history of the now mature actor Brad Pitt and the beautiful Cate Blanchett is happening in a couple of hours of Adriana Barraza, in one of the performances more realistic I've seen in a long time and whose class is easier to find in theater and not film ithappens in 24 hours or more, but this is not any impediment so that stories can narrate a few among others.With a slow and leisurely pace, we skip the Moroccan deserts desert border between Mexico and United States, then a big leap towards the colourful and noisy streets of Japan. Flooding the tape with long sequences without dialogues, but intense all and poignant, highlighting two particularly, whereby some characters discover some place unknown to them, like a pair of children who visit for the first time Tijuana and are surprised at the intense images see behind crystals of their cars, or as the Group of tourists who come to a desolate village of Moroccowhose conditions are far from his comfortable life.And although it's accessible for all types of audience tape, this find history too slow and less chaotic and climate that loves dogs, are more suede tape contemplative and artistic, but somehow, there are some parts unnecessarily long on the Japanese side, although he intends whatever the most sublime, in fact, is the story more weakconcentrated in its artificiosa form partly neglected his Fund, greatly contrasting with the rest of the tape.Santaolalla music, Rodrigo Prieto photography and design art of Brigitte Broch, Iñárritu usual collaborators, make Act of appearance, with the difficult task of giving cohesion to this shredded tape, quite truthfully portraying the way of life from various regions of the world, including their rituals? Know how is a Mexican village wedding anyone? They do not have to look further, see this tape and will discover it.And as if the different languages spoken in the tape were not sufficient, suddenly the silence falls between their characters, of those intense silence that uncomfortable, painful and move, moments that uses very well the director showing that he is owner of a flawless technique. And declaring that, sometimes, to really understand us, the words are not necessary. |
2,139 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/744 | Jose Contreras | Los fantasmas de Goya | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The film's are condede few joys and will, I suspect, little audience. Missing heroes. There are only victims and executioners, and a painter that notes with an uncompromising eye. | Watching "The ghosts of Goya" one learns that a portrait cost three thousand real more if they were painted a hand and four thousand if the two were painted. Also learn how made Goya one of his engravings, from the manufacture of the paper until the pressing; details about the Inquisition trials, executions to bludgeon, the costume of the time. Milos Forman has put curiosity and attention. I leave it to others who are looking for the mistake with his sagacity; I'll stick with this Spain. the first part of the film seems a set of variations on the same theme: Goya paints the Queen is very ugly and does not know if beautify her or speak the truth with his brush; one of their models, Agnes is required by the Inquisition and asked the truth, but she prefers to sign whatever to avoid the pain. The father of Inés makes sign to the Inquisitor is a monkey to demonstrate that the Inquisition has no method. The Inquisitor suffers by his signature. Everything seems to lead us to a sick society where the truth seems madness and the madness of truth. And where the humor there.The second part takes the characters after an ellipsis of fifteen years. The madness of the former regime we come to the madness of the French troops who invade Spain. The same intransigent of the Church have become intransigent of the revolution. They remain the same with another necklace. The same change could have shot with the excuse of the civil war. If someone finds improbable it is because you are too used to the novel it always discerned logic.The film's are condede few joys and will, I suspect, little audience. Missing heroes. There are only victims and executioners, and a painter that notes with an uncompromising eye. It should perhaps be in the role of hero the father of Agnes, the only that rebels, powerless against the nonsense. |
2,140 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3521 | Iñaki Bilbao | La Condesa de Hong Kong | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Nice but very minor (almost) always genial Charles Chaplin comedy. | "During a crossing of importance, an exuberant young is camouflaged as a stowaway in the cabin of an American, not overly honest diplomat".Though the director was a true genius, it's a realization far below their potential. It is not that it is bad, that is nice and has some scenes, especially in the first half, scored in his white comical. What happens is that, IMHO, the script isn't very worked, and the realization is something charisma, if we take into account that the rate decays gradually. However other aspects are achieved: photography, decorations, costume. As regards a couple protagonist, for my taste is out of sync. Both, separately are very good, but on this occasion his Union not gets sparks precisely, proving something cold though which on occasions.Marlon Brando always said that he agreed to participate in the movie without even reading the script. That was its director and creator Charles Chaplin was enough to accept without hesitation. Later was arrepentió, although relations with the genius and Sophia Loren were very cordial. |
2,141 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1753 | Alex Largo | El velo pintado | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A different movie, discover their virtues (which for some may be defects), well shot, well directed, with good performances, with a solid script and it stands out by its own merit in the technical section. The painted veil is a film for a select audience. | Unnoticed that this film is being is curious. At first I thought that it was because the film was somewhat bland, but after seeing her, I can say emphatically, no. The film is a drama, not a melodrama. And it is something that is appreciated. You could say that "The painted veil" is a film of love, but we would be lying. The film is not a love story. It's about the clash of two people married and totally different to that from one day to another they are in Shanghai. You could say that it is a film for a select audience. It is not a commercial film, certainly is. not be what it is. But it is not a film for everyone. That requires a minimum capacity of reason, a bit of interest, and some patience. And this is something we enjoy a small part of the world's population.The unknown (or at least my) John Curran, delights us with an address expléndida in an expléndida film. More admirable is the pace given by the director to the film. Without haste, because it is a film that takes time, but that at no time is long or tedious. In addition, Curran, uses small clashes between the protagonists (or what is the same, edges comments) so that the movie is not boring. And you have to say that it does, as do the movie won't be as cold and becomes more enjoyable.The (to anyone unknown) main actors, Edward Norton and Naomi Watts, do a brilliant job. Without shrillness, without sobreactuaciones. simply perfect. Both (producers of the Film) make a work that (inexplicably) not them to awarded prizes of renown (although to Norton if it has nominated you a couple of awards).The script is strong, without holes, without loose. Very well built. The script makers can be proud. Other highlights in the film are wonderful photography and the magnificent soundtrack by Alexandre Desplat, which cost him a well-deserved Golden Globe for the overall best band Sonora.En, a different film, who knows their virtues (which for some may be defects), well shot, well directed, with good performances, with a solid (and especially good) script and that stands out thanks to its own in the technical section. |
2,142 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2186 | Silvia Giner | Dame 10 razones | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Endearing, funny, original, fresh. This film can be defined with all these adjectives. I personally recommend, it is a simple structure and round movie. | Endearing, funny, original, fresh. This film can be defined with all these adjectives. I personally recommend, it is a simple structure and round movie, but so beautiful is what tells me that truth which has excited me and everything. We can always go further than what we thought, we only need the Jiminy cricket who plays Morgan. And always we Central America great things where least expected you and even find someone special as the character that plays Paz.Como production of Mr Freeman I have to say that it has been a success to make this movie, I like the line that leads to this film. As the great actor no more than the obvious to comment on, we turn to the despelleje that it is what mola os.Do paz Vega, sorry guys but I have to admit that this time not her I can criticize, is great, if it is, but? lol I can tell you "why". Interpret the character of peace required a diction that make credible his Latin status (by certain Morgan, the Spaniards are not Latino and Spain isn't in Mexico), so we need a great actress or therefore someone who speaks English horrifyingly, there you have it, peace is perfect, if you see the movie in original apreciaréis what I tell you. In addition the caching of peace is probably below the majority of actresses that Morgan liked and which would have accepted the role, which "save budget" and finally it must be acknowledged that the grace that has peace do not the American balurdas, she has grace d their land and it shows up in Hollywood. "It is very well directed," course is relaxed, focused and credible, not as in "does Teresa, the hodgepodge of? say the body of Christ".Do but I have to say my compatriot as follows: peace fields wheat, for the sake of Jesus Christ not accept USA more papers in Latin you're pigeonholing? and you not obsession with the body.And without further ADO, I'm going to give 10 reasons to see this movie: - Paz Vega (after Lucia and sex, his best interpretation).-. Morgan Freeman-it is fun-is fresh.-it is very pleasant-must support the actors emerging outside.-by the mane of peace-extra scenes of after the credits-by the BSO.-Ironcita recommended it. |
2,143 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2233 | Francisco Bellón | Memorias de Queens | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Memories of Queens is a very real film but fails to address a story that really connect with the spectator. | Given the current film scene, wouldn't anything outlandish the creation of the figure of the Ombudsman of the Viewer. Someone who emule to Don Quixote and faced with giant windmills solo by safeguarding the honour and dignity of the public. At the same time, as show of support could be the film Indignados.Porque Association of consumers increasingly are more cases in which a movie deceive scam to the Viewer, or makes it a malicious campaign. I could say that memories of Queens enters the second field, that sell starring Robert Downey Jr., when it has few appearances on screen. The film is the debut as a filmmaker Dito Montiel, who adapted his novel Guide to recognizing your saints, inspired in turn by their own experiences of teenager. History is not a paragon of originality, is typical on young people in a slum in a big city that exposed people of various races and nationalities. The main virtue of the film is that it transmits the status of Queens in the Decade of the eighties with great wisdom and loyalty. But the feeling of verisimilitude and reality are not alone sufficient to justify tape whole, as to do so you need something more, a story that reaches the public, that catch, and that is well told. Queens memories does not have one or the other. His argument is simple and predictable, transmitting only the viewer boredom and tedium. Typical failures that could be expected given the inexperience of Montiel after the cameras must be added a fraying narrative, with a few temporary anything successful jumps. Interpretations, notably of Chazz Palminteri as well as sporadic appearances of Robert Downey Jr.Memorias of Queens is a very real film but fails to address a story that really connect with the spectator. On the contrary, it offers a plot without interest and that it will lead to many yawns in the stalls. |
2,144 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/273 | Verolindapechocha | La casa del lago | 2 | 5 | muchocine | I cried as if I had dead boyfriend, but the story does not have nor ton or they are and raises a number of inconsistencies that make it a great nonsense | I have just returned from the announced movie La Casa del Lago (2006) which marked the reunion of one of the most popular movie couples: Sandra Bullock and Keanu Reeves and this editor can not more than say the following: PLOP! (Condorito style, I demand an explanation!)In the last post, a comment left by one of our editors, Oli, indicated that the film was hiperromántica and in fact, I have to agree. Even I must admit that I cried as if I had dead boyfriend or they hit my favorite pet. Peroooo. The story does not have nor ton or they are and raises a number of inconsistencies that basically makes a great nonsense. That Yes, a great romantic Super nonsense.To me I bought with the reference of impossible love that makes the book persuasion of my favorite now and always, author Jane Austen (author of the fabulous pride and prejudice which was adapted for the big screen last year).Kate (Bullock), a lonely doctor and Alex (Reeves), a romantic architect, are perfect for the other. Both love the Lake House and are owners of the same dog (Jack). But the great but with this story is that Alex lives in 2004 and Kate in 2006 in the period are known via correspondence through the "magic" box of the Lake House. Since the approach without further explanation can notice the Rocky ** may be the story. Why, yes they will see, go with the intention of seeing a fantasy and not try to understand this illogical plot.His love that starts in 2004 will have to stand the test of time and wait until 2008 to materialize. Why not in 2006 which is when Kate falls for Alex? Because by pure whim of the writer. See her and realize of because I say this. In fact it is more dramatic and romantic that the protagonist has waited for her four years. Well, that to me made me moquear like crazy. It is certainly an effect well Austen, which seems to be having much success today.Drew me attention to the director, the Argentine Alejandro Agresti, who seems to have happened to the ranks of Hollywood with great support. For more references, he was the director of A night with Sabrina Love.Otra thing that has left me: OHHH, is the fact that Sandra Bullock and Keanu Reeves have not aged anything since that made Speed in 2004, more than one decade ago. Pact with the devil? Another point in favor of the film is the beautiful photography and architectural beauties which shows the great city of Chicago.Una actress in a supporting role in the story is Shohreh Aghdashloo who already saw action notably in the House of sand and fog. The casting of the Lake House was going well until that they chose for the lousy actor, Ebon Moss-Bachrach as the dreamy brother of Alex. Also little exploited is the history of love-hate of brothers with their father, but well, this is perhaps a problem of Edition, which have cut more scenes which had to meet a defined length. This is my speculation is in mystery disappearance of Alex age, prior to 2004. Data: The film is based on another Korean film Il Mare or Siworae. I would like to see this original version, there is a little more consistent. |
2,145 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/184 | Pablo | El caso Slevin | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Interpretations are generally very good, although it is difficult to believe you to Morgan Freeman making mafia boss | I love vengeance movies, maybe are my favorite. Anyway I will try to be objective even taking into account this comment. Given the number of famous actors who star in this film it is assumed that the Ribbon of the film would be the height. interpretations are generally very good, although it is difficult to believe you to Morgan Freeman making mafia boss.That whole story rests on an actor so doubtful as Josh Harnett is dangerous, but given that the director made him act very convincingly in obsession (Wicker Park) the truth is that it takes him very well over the course of the entire film.(Recounts history as a series of misfortunes catastrophic;) lies on Slevin. the unfortunate young man will go to seek asylum on the floor of a friend which to disappeared from the face of the Earth as if by magic. Following here our protagonist will be involved in a series of conflicts of identity that forced you to perform a murder if you want to pay a deudapendiente that his friend has with "The Chief," a mafia boss who is faced with the rival band led by "The Rabbi". So then the protagonist must go slowly keeping stylish situations more complex to avoid it to unleash a war of bands that put an end to his life.The styling and the way of narrating the film is surprising very beautiful and uses resources very innovative when it comes to telling sub-historias. The only thing and perhaps most disappointing of the film rests on the main motivations of the history and the lack of realism in some scenes that make more than a thriller film look like a tape of action. The soundtrack is quite inappropriate in most times and only works guarantee on a couple of occasions. |
2,146 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4036 | Caruco | Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Joe Wright is not confined to create images as nice as surface (for-that-are-good), or a mix cheap poetry and romanticism of announcement of perfume, they are full of meaning and content in this prodigious film. | I have not read the novel by Ian McEwan British, although it has been rated as one of the best works of the last years, and (almost) impossible to adapt into a film. Instead, what I've seen Joe Wright movie. And can sense that the starting material was not easily translatable to the big screen; but at the same time, he does wonder why it was so difficult to adapt it, because the talents of Joe Wright achieved that result, relying more on the images in dialogs, be extremely cinematic.Filmmaking qualité, with the british label, and at the same time commercial can bring you quite a few enemies, and more with the impudence and shamelessness that attempts to combine the two elements Wright. But one cannot more than surrender to the results achieved. A single vision of the film is not sufficient to unravel even half of the virtues and secrets of the Mise en scene full of Visual ideas, and also dominates Assembly and the flashbacks a charm inserts.Of the lightness of his first Act, to the grey tone of the second and the darkness (with light at the end) of the third, Atonement is humming various topics: desire and guilt, pain, ethics, capacity of fiction and even lust represented in a bar of chocolate!, in a thread of situations threaded for a girl of twelve years, Briony (Saoirse Ronan), rowdy scenesletters and words that you don't know how to read and that will cause the conflict to mark its protagonists.Also his sister mayor, Cecilia (Keira Knightley), to be delivered to their chores and illusions, wrapped in bouquets of flowers, either drowning in his travails and thoughts in silence, as he exhaled the smoke from a cigarette, becomes another example of excellent character portrait.Exhibiting an overwhelming amount of resources, Joe Wright up allows a curious choreography during the presentation of Briony 18 (Romola Garai), between the rest of body of nurses in a hospital of war in London. Briony who, then, will check that it is hardly able to speak, but barely whispering phrases. Or the Fireworks end, with a memorable monologue performed by veteran and reputadísima Vanessa Redgrave.Incluso in its middle stretch, the less grateful, placing Robbie Turner (James McAvoy) in full battle of World War II, on the French front, and dotted with a superb level sequence on the beach (mark Wright), where the defeated English army waiting to return to their island; the force of the narrative, leaving it basically the image, and not the words, who transmit, seems the best despite the fact that might lead to the (false) idea that the main story, between the three protagonists, has been stagnant. No less great is that blatant level detail of a cinema screen projected a scene between two lovers, and in which the silhouette of Robbie is torn between desperation and the need to return to his life, in a period of unusual film vampirism.A few examples to demonstrate that Joe Wright is not confined to create images as nice as surface (for-that-are-good), or a mix cheap poetry and romanticism of announcement of perfume, they are full of meaning and content in this prodigious film faults and redemptions, and capacities of fabulation, in his double-edged: for better or for worse. |
2,147 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2003 | JLO | Sin city | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is a film that hits in various ways, which does deserve to see but he ends up running out even by their own - and exaggerated-virtues. | Filmmaker Robert Rodriguez took as story board the graphic work of Frank Miller's Sin City (a legend in the world comic, responsible of the best Batman, 300 and long etc.) to achieve an impact of action, aesthetic and a real before and after in the history of the genre and its adaptations. We must also highlight the work of the comic in the film today, art always disregarded and that only in this Millennium is real acceptance and its importance.The picture is of a white and black excellent, perhaps unrealistic and insurmountable, with a transfer filedigno frame by frame of the comic and a right direction of actors, are exclusive merit of the Mexican Rodriguez that continues to grow with a filmography a bit despareja but always passionate.Miller is a fair co-director only for having carried out the comic and the screenplay, in addition to oversee the entire process. But not everything is rosy. Perhaps this translation with so much love and loyalty takes away a bit of rhythm and personality so much visual dexterity. There is a clear abuse of the voiceover, easy resource for when there are ideas and the ultraviolence by time - smoothed by the neutral color - reach tire.Becomes a bit tedious, uneven, slow in the third tale starring Clive Owen (the weakest of the protagonists), precisely in which participates Tarantino in a segment in the direction, although it did not clash for nothing with the address or aesthetics of the film, noticing his influence - in addition to the own friendship with director - both in the segmented plot violence pulp and praised and cryptic Assembly.The casting is equally impressive, standing out Bruce Willis always as the scruffy and romantic hero this time fighting against a pedophile, and a surprising and unrecognizable Mickey Rourke its look - behind kilos of latex - both for his good performance. Sin City is a film that hits in various ways, which does deserve to see but he ends up running out even by their own - and exaggerated-virtues. |
2,148 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/590 | Bloody Will | El diablo viste de Prada | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Perhaps a little longer towards the end, but I give my first excellent of course. The surprise of the year, so far. | When I finished watching the film I was under the impression that had seen a revisitación of "Weapons of woman", without that have nothing to envy to the classic Mike Nichols. The action seen thousand times of "women seeking the top" achieves a freshness in this film makes me understand why has been the "sleeper" of the summer in the USA: a great fundraiser for a film that deserves it. Finally something of consistency.I know that girls will be most identified with the theme, so cruel and aggressive competitiveness among them, but not you you frightened the boys of boring there's nothing. Its light male version might be "In Good Company", but lacks the nasty and funny situations that "Devil" gets poured.Hathaway began with "Princess by surprise" and that has given background to make a comedy like this. The girl falls nice and responds impressively against this monster that is Streep. It starts being the "Yo soy Bea" magazine, and you think it, to become, by necessity, the best candidate for this programme of four model. You can think that it is superficial, but it is a truth as a temple: Ascend do everything. That is what shows Hatthaway, and the outboard. Nor by far is ridiculous with her partner multinominada, which is that is out.Meryl Streep gets her you hate until the bowels, and you're done thanking God for not having a Chief/to like this. It is the best villain this season, well above Lex Luthor, and with that I say everything. The actress, in a ways and looks impressive technique, crush without mercy and without ever raising the tone, how many people have to their around a form that appears to completely lawful. Ask her everything and does everything to annoy and bring to exhaustion suffered attendees still have to thank him for his time. And who can interpret this role better than anyone?, Streep, of course.I laughed a lot with the vicissitudes of the protagonist to get book 7 of Harry Potter for the daughters of the head. Shows that the ego to get us more can all a "you're the best" that our own personal dignity. The protagonist will travel that road without return which is sell your soul to the head, knowing this that has come very cheap.The side does not disappoint. Stanley Tucci is the Stylist of the magazine that has their own dreams of flying, and Emily Blunt is the Secretary which sells for a good party. Two great performances are at the height of the entire film.It is without doubt the comedy of the year, and it would not be unreasonable thinking that Meryl Streep could get his nomination number 14 on his career. Required viewing for those who want to see a comedy well made and with good performances. Perhaps a little longer towards the end, but I give my first excellent of course. The surprise of the year, so far. |
2,149 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1327 | Oscar Cantero | Shin Chan ¡Los adultos contraatacan! | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Pure trash in which a child apologiza all possible swearing before the impassivity of the agencies which then boast of protecting minors and defend their interests. But of course, it is always easier to blame the prevailing slavajismo in many schools teachers... | If were not enough withstand the series on a national station mornings and in more than one of the thematic channels, they now move back to the cinema to the nasty, rude, poorly educated and uncouth Shin Chan, that disgusting child that makes getting drunk, showing their intimate parts and making constant obviously a way of life. In an era in which has even set a schedule protected for children (where have place all the clunkers programs which are dedicated to discuss who has more silicone or challenge people to demonstrate to a machine with who have been lying), must not tolerate the existence of these productions.Frankly I do not know what you are children to these drawings. They are poorly made, the stories are absurd and instilled values of more negative for some minds in training. This great fame of the bug it is attributable to the scoundrels of the programmers of television stations, which seems not to have children, or they must import them very little. Anything goes to get audience. The absurd argument consists in bringing to Shin Chan to lead a group that aims to counter a gang dedicated to drugging the adults so that they behave like infants. Many aberrations are committed under the guise of freedom of expression, and one of them is allowing the issuance of this garbage. But no Government is capable of risking him wary of retrograde to a measure that would protect the mental health of children. Also have much blame some parents who allow their children to bathe of this dirt. But of course, if the child is problematic, it is easier to blame the teachers. |
2,150 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/473 | Jeremy Fox | La noche de los girasoles | 4 | 5 | muchocine | One of the most interesting proposals Spanish film has given us this year. | It is curious how, quite often, the best of the year of the Spanish film we must find in little-publicized films or, even, of poor distribution. East has been the case of "The night of the sunflowers", the debut in the direction of feature films of Jorge Sánchez-Cabezudo.La official synopsis, which never should be much case, reads as follows: "Pedro and Esteban are two cavers arriving in a mountainous area of Avila to study the finding of a cave and determine if it has scientific interest." Gabi, the girlfriend of Esteban, which awaits accompanies them to the foot of the mountain. "But when the cavers come out of the cave, they find Gabi terrified?"Actually that is not the real starting point because the film consists of six chapters, each told from the point of view of one or several characters. The first two, precisely the most fragmented data, are those who will lead us to the point described by the synopsis. The problem is that this initial submission so fragmented is something trastabillada and not ends of being perfectly topped.But just now described by the synopsis, about half an hour from the beginning, the film catches the viewer and no longer him loose until the end. There the story, despite further composed of chapters, begins to move in a more linear fashion and offers us the most interesting moments of a plot that moves between film noir with enough thanks to a good script and sober Sánchez-Cabezudo address solvency and social portrait. In fact, at times reminded me to "Fargo", the great movie of the Coen.Ayuda brothers to the end result, and much, the cast of actors, among which I would highlight an always effective Carmelo Gómez (Esteban, a little grateful role), Vicente Romero as a peculiar civil guard and the couple formed by Cesareo Estebanez (Cecilio) and Walter Vidarte (Amos el loco) as part of one of the most beautiful and comic of the film stories: the feud between the only two inhabitants of an abandoned village.Celso Bugallo deserves special mention. His performance is a gift to the eye of the Viewer. BUGALLO is a big one; an actor who knows how to move before the camera and is able to express an incredible quantity of nuances with his eyes. I hope that Spanish Cinema will provide more opportunities to dazzle us with his talent because he amply deserves.Everything said above makes "The night of the sunflowers" one of the most interesting proposals Spanish film has given us this year. |
2,151 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/729 | Jose Contreras | Infiltrados | 3 | 5 | muchocine | What I'm saying is that a film director not can kill one of his creatures in any way the same as a master can not kill one of their pets. | What I'm saying is that a film director not can kill one of his creatures in any way the same as a master can not kill one of their pets. Long listening at a Conference to José Luis Sanpedro have their characters charged its own life, which he as a creator at most that arrived was to portray them. I found a beautiful exercise in humility confess unless a creator, a chronicler. When you create a character being in front of the audience to a human being with all that that entails. When the film zarandea and punished without mercy one innocent man is because the director he has reserved a happy ending. No vulgarity is not shoot thousand times the same thing, it is a Covenant. Viewers we are honest to a burning nail losers. If a famous director wants to break you molds then put the camera in an ashtray or make a traveling overhead from a spit, but dispatch to who pleases is not of Knights."Infiltrated" also it has a good of those who make history, he has a good of truth. One knows that it is good. It doesn't matter in that side of the law is, could be gangster, or not to be. The girl knows it. The director can make mistakes with their balance, I can be wrong, but if Vera Farmiga will lie with a type, it is because such is good, it does not return spreadsheet.The good and the bad are murmurs with mobile, nothing of secret keys. A RAID planned to the millimetre collapses because the mafia tópo know write sms's with the phone into his pocket. The police mole hangs from another phone. Called with a dead mobile, moles are not known, but they have direct line. The film there on a mobile phone.The film is two moles. The mole of the Irish mob in Boston is a lackey of his head that rises in the Police Corps without stopping. We know that a body of officials the most incompetent is that scale higher. The police mole infiltrates the mafia and the boss knows that he has a mole, but does not know who is. In the midst of a string of murders and a matter of traffic of microchips for future Chinese arms industry, bad Mole conspires with his mobile to rid the mafia of the police, while good Mole is played the skin so the police reuna tests. |
2,152 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1077 | Ramón Balcells | El ilusionista | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The film of Neil Burger is a quality entertainment, with outstanding performance and a correct script (with a final twist too sharp). | Last year I discovered in this excellent comedy-drama called sideways to a sublime actor Paul Giamatti (secondary par excellence of the past years). Since his triumph with this independent experience, Giamatti has led his career as a way to respond. The last time that we saw his interpretation has been in "The illusionist", a film that without it would be practically nothing. As well stated in the title, the film revolves around a magician (a kind of wizard that creates illusions and performed by a correct Edward Norton) in Vienna at the beginning of the 1900s. After one of his works to the Crown Prince Leopold (a charismatic Rufus Sewell), the thing starts to get complicated, especially because of the appearance of the fiancée of the latter, Sophie (Super Jessica Biel), a childhood friend of Eisenheim the illusionist and the inspector of police (an excellent Giamatti) Uhl. Mystery, magic, romance and plot twists could be (or are) the main genres of the film by Neil Burger. The film has a formidable beginning, absolutely coerente eventually, entretenidísimo and with the start of a flash-back which continues almost finish the film. Well, the script presents some fall considerably mild pace that makes losing interest to the story and the characters (pretty well drawn, yes). The rest of the film is simply entertaining, to reach that end too evident surprise but, on the other hand, not too misleading (being a film nowadays). "The illusionist" is a story that attracts (the Magi, like it or not, always captivate the public), because lately we are seeing an excessive appearance in the film ("Scoop", the not yet released "the final trick: the prestige").Interpretations of the film, as I have said, are in general more than correct, highlighting the huge Paul Giamatti and Jessica Biel in a brief role, but intense. Although Edward Norton, the great King of the movie, does a correct interpretation, not giving much of it.Within the technical aspects, "The illusionist" presents a photograph beautiful with a dark touch too dark. For me, it is tired to be seeing during the film a touch of contrast black around the image, as if it were a dream (or illusion).. Mounting is really good, with a few cuts and transitions (circular) really imnotizantes.In short, the film of Neil Burger is a quality entertainment, with outstanding performance and a correct script (with a final twist too sharp). |
2,153 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3404 | Rafa Ferrer | Star Wars V: El imperio contraataca | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Finally, for which even not have ventured you to see the film, once again, very recommendable without a doubt. | Faithful to my Mania see the trilogy of Star Wars of upside down (as I saw the first time I did), today I have been visionando the episode V, "the Empire strikes back" the best Star Wars movie according to fans and geeks of the saga of George Luca$.Well it is true that in the recently edited trilogy on DVD it has managed the image and sound quality is excellent, the changes of which I already talked when fell the trilogy in my hands has made that perhaps this the favorite movie of the fans, now, with these improvements quite more attractive.And that when rereleased improved many of the things we had seen in the original movies, however, now with the touches things change (for the better) but you have to backtrack from what I said earlier.Are few, but well avenidos the inserted touches, but not River the end result.Finally, for which even not have ventured you to see the film, once again, very recommendable without a doubt. |
2,154 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2447 | Tito Chinchan | Shortbus | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film about the sexual of a strange group of New Yorkers and everyday problems. Not is if you intend to shock, but after 6 or 7 fellatio starts to do boring. Shocked on the basis of sex begins to be heavy. Moreover, little or nothing. | The world of the autofellatio is coto private men, for obvious reasons. Who do not ever thought of in the well would be able to do oral relief so that Yes? I since I saw this film, I lost any interest they might have had. By the way, this actor, after this filming, what kind of roles offered? I do not think it comes out in a cameo with the teletubbies, not.The film is about newyorkinos which are fatally. On the one hand, a sex therapist who has never had an orgasm, which meets a dominant Mistress dealing with the help. On the other hand, a gay couple who want to give vidilla their relations getting more people to the rejoicing and gloating. On the other hand, a neighbor spy them and gives the zambomba. And all are finished concentrating on Shortbus, a social club where people go to a sexually inhibitions.You can call me old or short-sighted, but a film that begins with a type throwing the issue in the mouth after autofelacionarse, seems to me to be cinema. The script of the film is to me a little weird with people with problems that I do not think too everyday, at least the way of raising them and fix them. The argument really not contributed me almost nothing, with the exception of "know" a little more about the world of gay sexuality. But hey, this has no feet or head. Possibly should be read before the statements by the director to be able to focus.In short, film about sexual of a strange group of New Yorkers and everyday problems. Not is if you intend to shock, but after 6 or 7 fellatio starts to do boring. Shocked on the basis of sex begins to be heavy. Moreover, little or nothing.kisses. |
2,155 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2110 | Rafa Ferrer | Supersize Me | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A plea to the healthy, eat well life, and healthy... impossible in times in which we are... | McDonalds diet follow mainly children and adolescents at least five times per week. One in every 4 Americans suffers from obesity. The result is that 17 million of the population of the States suffers from diabetes (60% more that 10 years ago) and cardiovascular and gallbladder cause havoc. The health annual cost of treating obesity is about 255 euros per person. Meanwhile, the Democratic Republic of the Congo spend hardly around 8.5 euros per inhabitant in all health services. For the moment, McDonalds to prevent claims of obese as smokers against tobacco companies already reacted offering vegetarian meals Veggie Burger soy-based and a dozen of salads. Supersized-me, who happens to be a communicative, insurance experiment that helps to raise awareness about the amount of necessary food. With an exceptional soundtrack, some quite Curran drawings, a quite good way of treating the idea "Supersized" (giant menus) that this widespread and that we always tend to catch as!He hala that cool! and that, according to the movie are quite harmful for the health. The high power and black hand of McDonalds, his high popularity among mainly children of the House. High levels of obesity in United States and how bad that passes the protagonist (including vomiting). A documentary you definitely must see. Increasingly, and since that I read "Toxin" Robin Cook, more hate junk food. |
2,156 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1321 | Plissken | Diamante de sangre | 3 | 5 | muchocine | 'Blood diamond' is a higher than the average of the Hollywood of now, with an utterly protagonist Duo and entertainment checked with agility and brilliance. Pity that claims transcend undermine it in part at the end. | Many still wonder why Leonardo Di Caprio has not been nominated for an Oscar for his very good work in 'The departed'. The answer is, naturally, in 'Blood diamond', the last film of Edward Zwick, of profession his epic dramas, and excellent vehicle for performances of its two nominated players.In troubled Sierra Leone for 1998, the civil war is at its height. The thousands of diamonds smuggled out of the country financed equally to the Government troops and the guerrillas of the FUR and drown the people in his own blood. A South African soldier of fortune, a fisherman who seeks his family and a American journalist are caught up in the search of a large pink diamond, which can get them hell they are.Few buts you can be Zwick on this occasion, perhaps the same as always, but something less. His style (especially his best-known filmography) is defined from their first major production, 'Days of glory': staging grandiose, protagonists with own moral codes which are transformed in the middle of major conflicts, secondary that portray people foot. all very correct, very neat, that Yes. 'Blood diamond' is a return of the screw to the scheme, a dish with all the ingredients but a little bit more crude. And luckily, because talk about something so tremendous as the massacres in Africa or child soldiers needed to put all eggs in one basket. And Zwick surprised me by showing without fuss one of today's greatest atrocities, see kids of 10 years shooting entire villages without mercy. Good for him. But neither remata the task this time.The treatment of the extreme situation that recounts is right and shaky in the first half of the film. Of the hand of Solomon Vandy (arrogant, powerful Djimon Hounsou) know the tragedy of the millions of refugees who see how civil war destroys their lives on behalf of a revolution that never comes. Later, Danny Archer (excellent Di Caprio with included South African accent) emerges as the mercenary gambling and selfish, capable of sacrificing anyone with such to achieve its objective. Both are survivors, in constant danger and with different but complementary interests at times. Unlike them his attitude towards life (and death), but joins them his strength of will. And always they are in tension, distrust each other. Great couple, the greater success of the film.But there comes a time, after showing the horror of this war, in which the plot should move towards somewhere. And it is here where it appears the reporter Maddy Bowen (correct Jennifer Conelly), to operate the change in the heart of the antihero Archer. It is there where 'Diamond blood' loses bellows as violent action film to turn towards the humanitarian thinking. And while Archer continues without losing its essence of mercenary without scruples (see Di Caprio firing to point-blank to children by heavily armed to be, is shocking), the film will be preparing for a final third that follows the canons of Hollywood. It is effective, but stop risking morally. And the epilogue, well then, very consistent either with the real story, I believe that there is extra. As action movie, of course, I prefer barbarism without adulterating 'Apocalypto', by very incorrect to be.Technically, Zwick demonstrates that he knows to move in renditions of this style without problems. It also has the valuable help of Eduardo Serra in photography, Dan Weil in the design of production and James Newton Howard in music. The result is brilliant, of course.Total, which contrary to what suggested topical trailer, 'Blood diamond' is entertainment higher than the average of the Hollywood of now, with an utterly Duo (best in V.O., I sense) protagonist and checked with agility and brilliance. Pity that claims transcend undermine it in part at the end. A 7. |
2,157 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2928 | Ramón Balcells | La Jungla 4.0 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The jungle 4.0 is a big, without pretensions and fact with true grace. | In the times, who put the limits in the action film? No one. Now more than to worry about the ingenious and funny action scenes, producers are looking for that called spectacular. Jungle 4.0 is the clear example of the second theory, a show big, without pretensions and fact with true grace. Gentlemen, multiple action sequences are served by a chef so far well unknown (at least for my): Len Wiseman. It may many of them (or rather all) be literally incredible, but the truth is that this man knows shooting with effectiveness and grace which, although you sounds strange, few current directors know them filming. It is clear that this is a feature film made to enjoy, to not worry or the least such basic things in adventure films such as the reasons for the villains, personal relations between the protagonists, etc. Yes, the film in question appears in all this, but it is simply introduced to fill basic points. If the third mission of Ethan Hunt the objective of not sinteresaba bad a cumin, here (despite being raised grandiosely, and very well achieved) that Timothy Olyphant plan concerns us less. In the jungle 4.0, therefore importantly its above-mentioned visual aspect, the impossible stunts and bestialidades McLane carried out and sentences that this loose. And you can, as I say, that the terrorist attack (carried out by the director of respond way) is very well achieved (the Assembly of Presidents, of the White House?), but here we come to see the return of our dear John McLane and not a simple movie of terrorists. And that, without doubt, Bruce Willis is practically all the jungle 4.0. We could say that we are at a real blockbuster, a palomitera film to every rule that fulfills its mission. And most important of all is that my, that I am not, nor much less, fan of the saga, has seemed really trepdiante. A correct exercise exclusively dedicated to the return of a policeman in 1988 caused real furor with this wonder of entertainment titled the jungle of glass (indeed, painful the translation to the American title of this fourth installment). If the first, as I have just mentioned, was a brave, highly intelligent and claustrophobic sample of action cinema, following two deliveries were limited to continue its success and therefore did not show such enthusiasm as in its predecessor. And, fortunately, this last (I hope!) delivery is limited to participate in what today dominates: the technology. Many more action scenes a recuperadísimo Willis (the best of the tape) and already have the final dish. And in this, rather than being Samuel l. Jackson (great choice of McTiernan) which accompanies the poly hard kill, is the youngster Justin Long, that just makes what we must: complaining and four computer words. Also is "replaced" to an interesting Jeremy Irons with the aforementioned Olyphant, which is not to be kill by having too much charisma.Mr McLane has returned, and in a very satisfactory manner. This is an unusually good action film, but it is also a form of entertainment without the slightest depth (and perhaps too long). But for now, Bourne and it seem the very best of the summer. And remember: Yipee Ki Yay Mo!. |
2,158 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2641 | Francisco Bellón | Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The fantastic four and Silver Surfer is not just another clear example of the regrettable condition in that is action cinema and fantasy of Hollywood. | One of the basic laws of physics is that it is a reaction of the same magnitude to each action. This law can be applied to much of the activities of the human being, although in many cases the reactions tend to be disproportionate. The film was not going to be less, and the reaction to a success at the box office is devise a continuation of the same to perpetuate the streak.And so, here comes the sequel to the fantastic four, decent movie super heroes whose sole purpose was the entertain the Viewer without incurring too many errors. Facts that at another time would be common in action movies today are difficult to find real virtues. The history of this new release continues at the time that stayed the previous one, with the heroes turned into stars media which beans are gained through the promotion and advertising, such as David Beckham any. Everything is ready for the wedding of the century between Ree Richards (Ioan Gruffud) and Susan Storm (Jessica Alba) in a ceremony which will leave in mere village and palette pachanga to link cienciólogo Cruise-Holmes. However, the idyllic picture is altered by the emergence of a new and strange villain that is dedicated to agujerar the planet (and no, it is not the Mayor of Madrid aboard the Tizona). To all this we must unite the gruesome Hollywood fashion introduce dramatic elements in action films. The script, despite efforts to achieve it, does not have the slightest depth. Before such script, you do not know what to do, if take it to banter and laugh alegramente its coast, or weep bitterly for torture so go unpunished. Some of the dialogues of the film are truly pathetic, although less sonrojante is not null interpretative capacity of Ioan Gruffud and Jessica Alba, who will stay in cute girl for debris, or permitting the surgery and botox. The only pleasant surprise that awaits the Viewer is the funny cameo by Stan Lee.Los fantastic four and Silver Surfer is nothing more than another clear example of the regrettable condition in that is action cinema and fantasy of Hollywood. What was entertaining and worthy in the first film has become boring and embarrassing in the sequel. |
2,159 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1007 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Hijos de los hombres | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Chronicle of an Apocalypse in the making. Impeccable model of nihilistic film, children of men poses more questions than solutions. | Impeccable model of nihilistic film, children of men poses more questions than solutions. I have already written several times that this is the nature of art. Produces anxiety, creates discomfort, induces pessimism and, however, is an ode to human life, a song beautiful, sparsely religious, although what happens can make us suspect that the moralistic side or mythological will succeed sometime: none of this happens. Intelligent hybrid of various genres (film political, science fiction, conventional thriller), children of men is an absolute Flash of light, a tenebrist and apocalyptic light so tells it (a pregnant woman driven by a former activist to view salvation has that 18 years ago that no woman is pregnant).Cuarón, who is a todotereno capable of giving life to Harry Potter, do road movies of teen sex (Y tu mamá also) and revolver casings with this fable of illegality and corruption, death and beauty, at the time, gives the target of entertainment without abandoning its nearest prontuario of metaphysical intent, namely: a world doomed to its dissolutiona world without God or Government that lives its last sky and their recent rales of tenderness.Manichaean in his final, meaningless resolution altogether of any blade of humor (or crazy character of Caine can get a smile, although it is proposed with a desire to), the film documentaliza the horror of the war, portrays the profound absurdity of the human condition with verismo (Malraux dixit) and how the love, that son fathered by women of color in a concentration camp, in the cold light of insensitive flexo ends (how to say otherwise) succeeding. |
2,160 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2123 | Bruji | Apocalypto | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Cinema of excellent quality, that captivates from the first frame, does not grant truce, restless and excited. | If the provocation personified, he would set his residence in the USA, it would be Catholic of Irish and equipped with a rear nice descent, he would meet Wíinik Ma name? Ki? imakkun óol in Mayan language, (be can translate this for "undesirable"?).Despite everything, Apocalypto belongs to a type of film of excellent quality, that captive from the first frame, does not grant truce, restless and excited, so it should seriously consider the deletion of some scenes requiring to close our eyes. Filmography of Gibson will be perfect when leave of side effects, such as nausea and dizziness in the Viewer.Mel Gibson, that bad actor, that great director that so many things, very interesting, has provided that count.Her armed with the passion of Christ, and when was accused of making a "gore" version of the New Testament and blaming Jews for the death of the Nazarene, the Christian Church (of Rome, also) he looked to his appeal, the Gospel according to St. John gave him the reason and Pontius Pilate continued washing their hands in public event. If I had not forgotten one of the three Marys, of Clopas, yours would have been the fifth Gospel, but as he said Wilder, nobody is perfect.On this occasion, returns to generate controversy by offering what is considered a vision skewed on the Mayan population, by putting his cruelty and ignoring that you it's one of the great civilizations of the pre-Columbian America. Do we are going, it is not likely to get a sa? at if? ipil (pardon) to return to Mexico. in defence of the neoyorquino-australiano film, it can be argued that, by placing the action in the days prior to the arrival of the Spaniards, all that is left of the once thriving Mayan civilization is a virtually extinct culture, who represented no danger to the conquerors. A village, in effect, auto-aniquilado, as shown in the film.In the absence of exact chronological references to specific geographical locations, it can be assumed that an episode of rivalry between independent cities existing at this time is telling (quichés, zutuhiles, MAM), the so-called florid wars that was aimed at the capture of living men to be sacrificed to the gods, as reflected in the Maya stelae and the frescoes of Bonampak. An appalling exercise in which based the reason of its existence the fearsome Aztecs, nightmare of the bearded men.On the other hand, the director also shows the inheritance of their high architectural and astronomical, knowledge that had reached its splendour six centuries ago, in the ancient Mayan Empire. In the 16th century, there are not even the great city-States of the new empire, which has been torn by infighting; still, approaching us to the "city of stone", with its hierarchical political system, its main monuments, religious fanaticism and its mathematical accuracy in the prediction of eclipses.It is not alien to the fascinating legends of the Popol Vuh (written in quiché maya), nor to the millennial prophecy which predicted a new start followed by five hundred years of darkness, which forced them to hide their elderly at the top of the mountains in the interior of the jungles, to preserve a wisdom that has come down to our days. (Not going badly aimed, in the old world burned them more than three hundred codices).I.e., that Gibson movies can spare you explicit images always, but conscientiousness has never lacked.However, they miss least some historical data to close the script and, incidentally, cultivate the respectable. For that reason, out of the film are many doubts that assail the curiosos-ignorantes like me, such as who is the conquistador Francisco de Montejo, year of our Lord 1527?, city of stone is Technotitlán?, "unknown brutal force" which is that of the Aztecs?. A few questions which are not response in the "How was shot", so we return to the starting point, to quote the historian William Durant goes for "almost" all cases (obviously Mr. Gibson, knowing that "A great civilization doesn't it conquer from outside if not has destroyed itself from within" does not justify the permanence of the United States of America in the 21st century Iraq).And little more can be reproached, perhaps (to continue with the controversy of the Yucatán), the hiring of an American Indian that gives life to a Mayan Indian, as Rob Marshall (china rather than Japanese) in memoirs of a Geisha. Moreover, at the cinematographic level, the direction is perfect; production, impeccable; the address artistic, unbeatable; All interpretations, superb; the costume, craft; photography, breathtaking; mounting, particularly distressing, and narrated history, the more courageous legacy that a town could inherit, the only that gives meaning to any life, which encourages, which encouraged to rise up. and to fight. |
2,161 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2803 | Txapulin | Caótica Ana | 4 | 5 | muchocine | I have mixed feelings. On the one hand the film has things that fascinate me, but I think that to Medem history you are Manus. | I have highly conflicting feelings about this movie. Who I have read enough here or know something my film tastes knows that I think Julio Médem best current Spanish film director. I am fascinated by their first two films, cows and the red squirrel, surrendered fell to Earth and I think it is one of my favorite movies. Lovers of the Arctic circle and Lucia and sex are two separate exercises of style and mastery, and even his documental-entrevista pelota seems a brave and sincere tremendamiente film, which although he failed in intention at the time, is one of the best portraits of the fucking Spanish tension in recent years and a torn cry of request for dialogue at a time when nobody was concerned about the dialogue, and why were loaded. Yes, were it they uploaded. The stale Spanish right crucified him as radical, and I imagine that from the abertzale left nor do they do very well regarded. The documentary had to be a preface for his fiction film Aitor, which was never done and I imagine was in the library of the never completed films. To make matters worse, his sister Anne died in traffic accident. After six years without a film of fiction of Medem and as a result of all these events comes Caótica Ana, an escape route on the subject of the Basque conflict and an emotional shock following the death of his sister. Or so play it I, which for something the movies of Medem are subjective and intepretables, and therefore better or worse depending on mood.I said that I have mixed feelings. On the one hand the film has things that fascinate me: images, music, camera movements, the Division of the movie into a countdown?, all the narrative magic of Medem is there. Do do then I love some characters, the same Anne, as we have at the beginning of the movie (do then changes and?, I do not know, then I will try to investigate this), Linda, the character of baby Klaus, German father of Ana?, then landscapes, the sea of Ibiza and the streets of Madrid, the use of art (the paintings of Ana, painted by the sister of director Ana Médem) as one narrative element?But I think that to Medem history, the argument itself, you are Manus. There is news that the director works his films at various narrative levels; This causes a smart complicity with the viewer who participates in his game. But here I something went wrong, the pieces do not fit. Or as Yes they fit, but a part of the resulting picture is ugly, I do not like, and that saddens me because of my favorite director wonders I hope, but you can not always have everything. I try to explain.I like the film as a tribute to the dead sister, as the portrait of a woman through the art expressing their inner chaos and his fear to die. I also like the portrait of the character of Anne through the excellent work of casting that has resulted in the choice of actress Manuela Vellés to interpret it. It is the casting of a look of multiple green, of an expressive smile of a voice, a laugh which is linked to the Angela of Earth or the Bethlehem of Lucia and sex, and by the way, of a beautiful body. I like both the character at the beginning of the movie that gives me lot of anger, how will degrade as it progresses the footage, especially at the end, finally being a ghost of what is at the beginning. I really like how the issue of death in some dialogues and I like the history of the women of the alleged "previous lives", but I do not like everything is explained from hypnosis and reincarnation. I like the treatment of sex and relationships male-female, and even the theory that that are all about whores and we are all a few rapists, but I do not like anything that serves as a political metaphor about the Empires and countries without State, and much less with this absurd ending that spoils the movie, because it gives importance to the least interesting topic that we have seen throughout the film so far.Overall, I felt that I was watching a very dispersed film, who does not know very well to where you want to go, and that when he arrives says me nothing interesting. That Yes, meanwhile, narrativamente is so poetic, magic and with scenes as emotive as only Médem knows to make his films. |
2,162 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1920 | Ivan Sainz-Pardo | Los Abandonados | 2 | 5 | muchocine | An irregular and interesting debut almost in equal parts to a Nacho Cerdá that begins its journey in the long format and continues to be a brave and safe bet for the future of the most terrifying film of this country. | Nacho presented the film and dedicated parents who were in the room. Rumored that the projection for the press of morning didn't go too well, but in the afternoon, this another meeting, the public showed joyous and expectant, cheering even the opening credits. Much of the technical team and the two main actors, Anastasia Hille and Karen Roden, who make a great and hard work in the film, also accompanied the projection. The film, which is the debut as largometrajísta of its author, this fitted with a very remarkable technical Bill and the House of Xavi Giménez is, without a doubt and by own merits, a proven quality firm. Giménez already participated in some of the earlier work of Cerdá, "The Awakening" (1990), "Aftermath" (1994), and "Genesis" (1998). The latter are two medium length very linked to the genre Gore, who knew how to find its audience and put a dent in fantastic festivals and horror as small works of worship. It is footage who sponsor this first film of Nacho Cerdá, feature film which, unfortunately, is once again a perfect showcase of the virtues and defects of productions of terror of the producer, that not only are almost all photographed by the same cameraman, but that also end up view all a bit like cut by the same pattern. Of "Abandoned" it hooked me above all the principle, which is predominantly a mysterious and disturbing atmosphere, together with an efficient work in the direction of art. We submerged in a brilliant composition full of poetic and disturbing levels. However, soon, you can see a certain abuse of some obsessively dark, scary decorations, old broken wrists, moans of babies and a whole series of very recognizable clichés within the genre. Some omnipresent sound effects to a volume completely out mother and an endless succession of scares efectistas and free, unfortunately, begin to seriously irritate the viewing. History, moreover, downside inexplicably a special drop to half of the footage, where the plot, once shown the letters, stagnates and surprises, after such jam theatrical disordered and chaotic, already does not have the desired effect. When the tape is then surprising in its final outcome, it is too late, although it is true that some of my favorite scenes focus precisely on this stretch. Cerdá, however, shows great talent, becomes larger and teaches the teeth when bound to agitate, provoke, suggest, in some of those moments of reflective in the recreation of a logradísima oppressive atmosphere, tension and suspense, as for example when the protagonists seem to wait together resigned to its final destination, without any doubt, one of the best moments of the film. The public, something cold, dismissed the film with timid applause contrasted with the enthusiasm of the beginning of the evening, and my I was feeling of having seen something which could have been spectacular, but that stayed a bit by the way, in an exercise perhaps too artificial and confusing. An irregular and interesting debut almost in equal parts to a Nacho Cerdá that begins its journey in the long format and continues to be a brave and safe bet for the future of the most terrifying film of this country. |
2,163 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1283 | Verolindapechocha | Corrupción en Miami | 1 | 5 | muchocine | A film where million had been invested (especially in locations) for impoverished results. A total disappointment! Miami Vice with malaza m. | Long did not see a movie so bad and I feel the moral obligation to tell you: do not see Miami Vice (2006).Despite the excellent credit:-written and directed by Michael Mann, director of the highly recommended collateral (2004) and the informant (1999). Michael Mann was the producer of the television series with the same name in the 80's. Depending on the result, I think that his "homage" did not do so with too much affection-stars as detective Ricco, Jamie Foxx, who recently played brilliantly to the blind musician Ray Charles in Ray (2004), won him very precisely the Oscar and BAFTA (British Academy Award) for best performance by a male in 2005-Colin Farrell (the new world), secunda Foxxplaying her partner of work, detective Sonny. While Farrell is not no actorazo, has some weight in the industry Hollywood. one scam gentlemen! The film is nonsense from beginning to end. The dialogues are dull, technical and incoherent. The action has nothing on another Thursday. The actions are completely irrelevant and stereotypical. Situations are full of platitudes. Apparently Mann believes that the scene non-plus-ultra of eroticism should be a "grip in the shower" because her repeat with both protagonists unnecessarily. He wanted to take advantage of the set of the shower? Who knows!Those who are looking for the "beautiful blonde from Miami" even to brighten the eye, lost. Bad sexy here is Li Gong, to what you believe, has his blog. Let's see if they understand! She is not feat. Some perhaps her remember the evil Hatsumono in memoirs of a Geisha.No understand. What were all these good performers in a very mediocre production? I am thinking to buy the script for use of soporific in my sleepless nights.From what little I remember of the television series, was not anything. I do not remember that it was my favorite TV series, but it was entertaining, something that this film is definitely not.If occurs that anyway they want to go to check what I say, even by mocking the bizarre ochentera fashion, characteristic of the original TV series, therefore nor find it. Here Ricco and Sonny dress as any child of neighbour.Note that it is a film where million had been invested (especially in locations) for impoverished results. A total disappointment! |
2,164 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/56 | Tito Chinchan | Los tres entierros de Melquiades Estrada | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Crudísimo drama full of fine and grumosos black humor jokes | Well, Titus Chinchan, as the winner of the contest of microcríticas of the world, left yesterday for the preview of this strange film, so my readers asuduos can be the first to read a few critical lines in this respect. By the way, if you invite to an event in the Roxy cinemas, do not need that you forth the tupper for the leftovers from the catering, which did not give us anything. Oh, and bring you a cojincito, that the seats are a little uncomfortable.The film is about the three burials that had a "wet back" called Melquiades Estrada. Died in strange circumstances, close to the border between Mexico and United States, his only friend in the country (Tommy Lee Jones) Decides to investigate a case that doesn't matter to anyone. Quickly discover the murderer of his friend and forces him to pay for the crime.Tommy Lee Jones made his debut as a director (producer, actor, co-writer and botijero) with this dotted with black comedy drama, but black, black. We must highlight the quality of the picture, which does not but highlight the deeply furrowed bodies of expressiveness. The script is quite curious, but seeing the characters, we may consider it more than credible. The actions of the protagonist is superb, the expressiveness of the same impresionandome. And that gesture, that face same applies for a funeral for a gala cocktail. What I was not far from clear whether the film is a drama, a comedy or a tragicomedy. The argument is a crude, crudísimo drama, but is full of fine (and grumosos) jokes about black humor, which makes me doubt the intentions of the own Tommy. I recommend that you go to view it as a comedy, as drama is very it lasts. By the way, most of the film is with subtitles, given that it is recorded in English and Spanish. Special attention to Tommy talking about Spanish, which would need subtitles rather than when he speaks in English.In short, better go to see a company that only. And cheerful mentality, but you're going to have a bad time of three pairs of noses. kisses. |
2,165 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/675 | Jose Contreras | Hijos de los hombres | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Like almost all the films Anglo-Saxon?Children of men? part of a fascinating premise, a pregnant woman in a world without children is enough to make any film walk. Cuarón helps it to talk about borders, exclusion and illegal immigrants. | I have to thank all the fellow bloggers, and also to the critics by having advanced one of the surprises that Cuarón was kept in the manga during the first half-hour: that the girl was pregnant. Least menos desvelador wakefulness that is to say that in the near future, in 2009, they are no longer children, birth and that the youngest man on the planet, for 18 years, just die in the 2028.Theo, the protagonist has ceased to believe in mankind. It enters the story because his brother directs the Ministry of culture and can get a safe-conduct to the girl. Ironies of the film, the bureaucrat is dedicated to save works of art within little anyone can admire what sense does the art without the human race? More sense to save the girl thing in which working everyone else, although not for the same reasons.As nearly all Anglo-Saxon cinema, "Children of men" part of a fascinating premise, a pregnant woman in a world without children is enough to make any film walk. Cuarón helps it to talk about borders, exclusion and illegal immigrants. The United Kingdom has become an impregnable fortress, the last bastion of civilization, a police state where the greatest crime is not having papers. Something similar to what actually is. The expectant mother has no roles. An NGO wants to use it to put an end to segregation. We learn to hate all those who want to use it because we know that the baby cannot be a means for nothing. Unfortunately for the film, was not the best way to defend the thesis of the creators.It has two flat unforgettable sequence. Childbirth is shot without a single cut, so either actress gave birth in front of the camera or to the child was an infographic creation. The second is shot in the middle of a powder keg. Clive Owen is moving between bombs and shots while the camera to separate from him, while thousands of things occur and destroyed buildings and cars. If you want to, one can have fun imagining what would have happened if after spending so much is wrong in a line and must shoot the plane again. |
2,166 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4183 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Classic films in the 21st century: Atonement is a copy and passionate love for a wonderful book (Ian McEwan). Again we see literature and the cinema caught the hand. Long... | There is a predictive cinema: one moves ahead of the plot, reasoning that the characters are always more runs later and gives with the distress key with astonishing ease. It is not that one is a prodigy or that you have already seen so many films that the talent and the necromancy have partnered their causes to our benefit. There is another puzzling anomalous film: one is misplaced and not right to find a point in the plot from where to take interest. Experimental film or terrible film disguised as experimental film. Then there is good film, inspired, that when one contemplates the serene harmony of classical proportions and has the certainty of that years later will be recalled when he saw the film, who enjoyed that so enormous pleasure and what bobo face (the side with which one admires the intelligence and beauty) we stayed when darkness disappeared and peopleoverwhelmed, happy, abandons the seats.Atonement rummages in the Christian concept of fault. Slowly (perhaps excessive in its premioso and almost infuriating boot), it enters the lives of those who grew up around a lie and how that lie determines its existence to the point that can not escape their infinite capacity for destruction. Fascinating from the point of view of go by lifting the formidable building of his argument from a simple premise (the idle and boring life of a teenage girl from high society forced to formulate an entirely false testimony) and a commendable plasticity, Atonement is a love story. Perhaps an unorthodox but love (to the end and Cape) is what moves the small plot knots that McEwan and Hampton (novel author and screenwriter of the film respectively) set out to offer emotions, a huge flow of them, emotions that impedes a sharp study of the hypocrisy of society which portrays, but even that is forgivable given of the (almost)(, now let me explain) satisfactory outcome of the film.The English aristocracy does not support heat: up a diner says that the haze exacerbates the nature and encourages losing the bonanza of the spirits. That the temperature rise detonates the tortuous and preciosista plot: the absolute molicie of whom everything has sometimes requires new toys that engolosinen your boredom. The rich girl used to invent worlds (because from the outset warned the eminently literary character of history: pure metaliteratura) can not resist the temptation of writing in the reality rather than in the invisible limbo of the folio blank. What his mischievous prose get is that an innocent (a kind of lacayo, a member of lower caste) loaded with the guilt of a sexual abuse. That informing aborted what could have been an extraordinary love story between the accused and his sister. Then Joe Wright begins with their temporary stunts, their intelligence and their more than sensitive sense of music, which takes over the tempo of the film and brand with concise noise key typewriter the upheavals, the connection between what is happening and that happened and that, in some arcane way, governs all the fringes of history. Without exception.Blame mingled in the spirit of the girl child, secretly in love with the man who smashes with his unhealthy niñería, is the common thread: everything is left to caress by this Atonement slowly 75º–82ºf, silent hatred regalada, swaying by pain, transmutada in one war instrument in this World War II serving as wild props.The typically English melódrama does not affect deeper meanings: Atonement moves away from the picturesque table of customs to the return to Brideshead or James Ivory tapes because what he wants is to show the Viewer (to the reader, first) a very simple purpose: we live to slopes with our sins, grow with them and we bury. The only difference, the element that the girl of delinquent imagination stipulates as an antidote to pain is literature, pure fiction, writing as grab that overwhelmed the infinite sadness. That is what makes success writer Briony Tallis: relive their convicted in the always overstuffed Kingdom of imagination. There, away from wars and injustices, errors and excesses, let them grow in his house next to the beach and there, in the book that grows in its interior, is where writer deletes the scene that dynamite his capricious and hedonistic, teens that that future lovers recognize his idyll with a sourcein an english garden Victorian packing and smell of tea and conversations galantes. The poetics of this image holds the entire subsequent history. Somehow, then chains the lives of many people. We learn in atonement that the destination is a bug bastard, one able to silence the splendor of a life based on whispers to levísimos tics of chance. We also learn that romance is left to contaminate of tragedy or that it may be impossible to define passionate (a brief moment of burning of a library before the eyes burnt by the curiosity of a child) of the fatality. All Atonement emanates fate, fate and moral misery. Impossible happiness becomes inevitable. This story of redemption is supplied from a formidable budget, how not. It is not enough to be a good movie but it is bound to more. This whirlpool of the industry is that recreates one of the most fascinating scenes these mine eyes have seen on a screen in a long time: the beach of Dunkirk, the neat and Baroque and delusional scan camera by an amazing landscape, devastated soldiers, los locos, which look at the horizon and sing hymns which hermanen them in the tragedyof the acrobats of their destiny mock death doing a few laughs from the sea while all around collapses, literally. And is not (also) free this Baroque visual style: everything we see, this lavish guignol, pushes the story where its creators wish, providing useful material to make what we expected more closely assimilated. Here there is no happy ending: it is not possible that there is. Betraying the spirit of McEwan could pull an extra viewers (Word of mouth is sometimes a gun loaded with nasty) but the precious history is its final stretch, the triumphal entry of a disarmingly full Vanessa Redgrave, which explains how his novel (which have seen on-screen in the last cent and peak minutes) is a farcean invention seasoned to expiate the guilt and Sin and the weight of all the demons that eat you heart when you know there is no way to return to the State of innocence that we was given.It is not a masterpiece. Here comes the corrective I have for not losing sleep tonight and sleep. It is not because the narrative material is so magnificent that his conversion to frames creates irreparable losses. There is also a bewildering gelidez moment. Cold and cunning, so seemed the film when there were after his exquisite and fundamental part. This coldness is worth, fits the purpose that guides his simple vocation of love story like glove. Truncated love, broken love, love turned into pink Novella melodrama, but the Fund is what matters, the impressive fresco of the human condition. I heard in a radio conversation, a not overly prepared to withdraw charm to the taquillazo, which Wright sinned of ersatz. I do not get to both, though I effort. I see artifice in everything that is fiction. Inevitablemente.hay much beauty in the movie. My prose needs an inspiration I no now have to deal with doubts of the gentle reader that creates me exceed and that I am simply selling personal emotions in excess. Atonement has the sumptuous elegance of classic cinema, part of a simply magnificent book (the Ian McEwan novel) and has enough support from the industry so nothing the ballast, and yet something depart me from considerla the jewel that is likely. To the best lack David Lean in command. |
2,167 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3828 | Heitor Pan | Soy leyenda | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The result is the dreaded, at the end you've seen a hodgepodge of ideas which is very difficult to stay with nothing, except with the performance of a Will Smith who had already demonstrated that it is able to load a movie on their backs. | Good ideas abound in the film. In fact just have to take a look at the films circulating in the world, a good example of good ideas, many of them very well carried out. If above, the idea out of a known novel, read by millions of people and made into a film on two previous occasions, one ensures almost altogether that the essential part of the story will not be bad. The problem often occur around the nucleus of an attractive story.In this case part of the novel bestseller by Richard Matheson "I am Legend", with substantial changes, relates how an army scientist becomes the last man on Earth, being the only human immune virus turns men into a kind of rabid vampires without other committed in its existence than the eat their healthy peers.Also the history of a catastrophic interesting halo and warning you can confer to attribute the spread of the virus to the man himself, telling that this is in principle a mutation of a deadly virus which in principle is going to win the battle against cancer. The premise is not bad for a discussion of the struggle of man against nature or the eternal quest for immortality.The problem comes when everything falls halfway between genres and is at this time when one leaves the film convinced that he has not seen absolutely nothing. The plot begins observing the life of Robert Neville alone with his dog in a way that reminds us of Castaway, the struggle of a type trying to not go crazy with his solitude. From time to time they assail us flash-backs of the attempt of Neville save your family in a vertiginous drama. We also assist the efforts of the protagonist to find the cure for the virus and fix all the desagisado which has caused. The genus is changing towards the Middle, turning to terror when you must escape the zombies to settle towards the end in the pure action and once again the drama in the last bars.The result is the dreaded, at the end you've seen a hodgepodge of ideas which is very difficult to stay with nothing, except with the performance of a Will Smith who had already demonstrated that it is able to load a movie on their backs, but that does not have an eye too clinical when choosing scripts other than comedy.For his part, Francis Lawrence, the director who had already brought the entertaining "Constantine", shows at times that it is capable of filming with good pulse, but is very difficult to do something worthwhile with a script that does not know what he wants to have more moments that fill of history.Finally, a point for managers seeking to acongojar staff (as if it were to read). The lawyer decided to come with me despite the fact that vampires were characters in the film and she was rather more scared in the parts in which Will Smith travels through empty houses and dark rooms in which in the end turn vampire looks over his computer-generated fronted (excluding the classic scare-based rise in volume and rapid emergence of bug on screen)(it works even if the bug of turn is Bambi). Do even they haven't learned that the terror of quality works in this way?Although, as in the end I did not no conclusion of the genus in which the movie was installed, maybe not this was what was intended. |
2,168 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2503 | JLO | El aura | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A film which reconciles us with the romantic idea of those who believe that money is not the solution, or the only option. And that even, does not change anything or anyone. A thought so dark and pleasant as the Aura. | After this miracle that was nine Queens, being an opera prima of critique and superlative public, at the head of the director successfully passed probably many things. Why took five years to ponder his next step. Which coincidentally, was an own project dating from long time and that the success of nine Queens has changed his tone, to make it more grim in his birth. The bet was swift and proved to be confirmation of a new star of the direction argentina, talking exclusively about talent, demonstrating that any chance was not done.It is, this time the best Argentine player - Ricardo Darín - not it becomes more inclusive of the film, you don't have to deploy all its expressive background with this exclusive merit, epileptic taxidermist of the director, which even seems to tell us that her first film was only an excuse to perform this.Also in the films of Fabian it is very rare that any actor clash. The Aura is the perfect antithesis of its precedent, but is also like that, round, with a solid script where you look at and is excellently filmed in all their items. But it is dark and relies more on their climates than in rhythm, paused without being slow; just the beginning refers to nine Queens with the scenes of the cashier and dream theft, filmed with the precision and the timming trademark already of Bielinsky.Hay references Yes. The use of classical music and the beautiful frames refer us to Kubrick, climates to classic Hitchcock thrillers, thick forests to the same as for Shyamalan. Up top, with its sorry and static protagonist mounting, reminiscent of the great Buster Keaton Las 7 times. Details just a dash of watchmaking, but more relaxed. Only a "lapsus" would be disposable, that is when the protagonist tells his experience with their attacks. A debtor of the explicit Argentine cinema scene. A film with several layers, escaping in a unique look.A scene of theft averages the film and the party in two. Both by the atypical form of deal with, almost absent - a theft who feels more than what he sees - and that adds a dose of "chance" to the script, nor it hurts anything to it. Bielinsky ultimately not only not disappointed, but that is exceeded. Just have to wait another five years will not be. Thank you for a beautiful open end, almost unprecedented detail in 30 years argento film.A film which reconciles us with the romantic idea of those who believe that money is not the solution, or the only option. And that even, does not change anything or anyone. A thought so dark and pleasant as the Aura. Another new Argentine cinema classic. The death of the director will be difficult to overcome loss. |
2,169 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2153 | Patri | Human Nature | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Fails the interpretation of actors, perhaps why the characters not excited to the Viewer, gives what just happens them, and therefore believe that these characters are not well built, are very superficial and even cold. | Do not I was disappointed because I knew that it was the film weaker Charlie Kaufman and Michel Gondry, so I expected the worst, and perhaps for this reason, no it has seemed so terribly bad, although it isn't at the height of Gondry and Kaufman.Cuando has finished the movie I tried to think that it is wrong in it, perhaps the script? I think that no, but nor is it the best of Charlie Kaufman, but it could have made a more interesting film.Fails the interpretation of actors, perhaps why the characters not excited to the Viewer, gives what just happens them, and therefore believe that these characters are not well built, are very superficial and even cold.Patricia Arquette I don't like, I never liked, I do not think it is good actress, although he wears some pretty natural nude in this film. Tim Robbins acts well from time to time, but this has not been one of those times. And Rhys Ifans does not wrong at all.It has some moments that I liked and when he sees mice eating with cutlery, I liked the music of that time. But little more should be noted, is a story of Gondry courage to dare to take her to the cinema and original. |
2,170 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1478 | Rafa Ferrer | Un puente hacia Terabithia | 2 | 5 | muchocine | I know that this movie had me thrilled with 10 years, the bitch is that I already have 30 and if they let me half things I usually get angry. | When one stands to see these films must let out his inner child who was inside, that we leave you sitting in a corner for quite a few years now, put the medium side head and try to enjoy with the projection, the funny thing is that in the press pass (must be given them through Deaplaneta by his pressbook and gifts that may be benevolent with critically.). I know that this movie had me thrilled with 10 years, the bitch is that I already have 30 and if leave me things half I usually get angry and the empty feeling that leaves me often me accompanies translate my opinion in a text which will perhaps then read someone before you see the movie.Let's go by parts; While the argument, the setting, including the interpretation of the kids is fucking great, the film is lost in a mix of things that, or my me has been nothing short of amazing, especially those filósofico-morales talks about life, religion and other stories, in a film that goes directly to "the chavalería" seem little appropriatePerhaps, that message the guys not the capture, but the olorcillo to keep them elders will be bad for the mouth of the film.Weta Digital has given skill from "the Lord of the rings" in caring for the effects for the films where he participated, once again, all the digital effects made by the New Zealand company are excellent, worked, care, and quasi-royalists. To learn from them in last Hollywood.Por, it had missed a ósculo between the 2 protagonists, as though kids are who has not lived his first love? |
2,171 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1937 | Kiko de España | Zodiac | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Over its 160 minutes we saw a game of cat and mouse with an exemplary planning that is perhaps in excess of the ellipsis. Or you want blinking, that you lose. | I remember that being a zagal I went to the cinema to see JFK and I left terrified cinema.Okay, so that same feeling I assails today after watching Zodiac, I do not know if the best David Fincher movie, but if the "classical" and contained (and the longest).To the point: who wait to see Donnie Darko and Iron Man callejeando in search of an enigmatic assassin, to stay at home, because this is more like all the President's men, or a good 70s political thriller (and a tad to that genius of Spike Lee's Summer of Sam was) to Se7en, what is not good nor badjust different (and a little longer).Over its 160 minutes attended a game of cat and mouse with exemplary planning (enhanced levels, the first thirty minutes), which is perhaps in excess of the ellipsis (there are little signs of situation every five or ten minutes, and that in a movie of 160' are many little signs) and information. Or you want blinking, that you lose.I see only one hit, and is that as I have said before, is a film "policiacoperiodístico" and not a thriller of those today, of those who directs Fincher, come on, and comes to the case (that timely expression) because there are moments in the film that are master, historical, terrifying, superlatives, and one wonders why does that tone during all the (long) footage.But then there would be no entitled Zodiac, Se2en would have been entitled. And another snag would put the characters, that not to the players (all master), which in some cases are no more. You have to see, that is the entry of Fincher on the Olympus of the directors, the rest of new Virtuosi rely more on the script, this runs as God. |
2,172 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3639 | Tito Chinchan | El virgo de Visanteta | 5 | 5 | muchocine | It may not be a marvel, but reminds me of the Nutella. It is not haute cuisine, or el Bulli you will find but at home with your bread up your ass you shalt. | Director: Vicente Escribá. duration: less than an hour and a half, no one gives more for less.Release date: February 15, 1979Espectadores: 1.010.657 human beings.In Catalan it is written, translated Spanish, I well I laughed, and I was even pleased the Woodpecker.A film practices, although more than one, by tuno, would have ended up in the fire.A critique I pidende this film that accidentally found, tits and asses for doquierrimadas eagerly.Strange speech heard, more laughing I cried with the misadventures of moza Visantetavirtuosa of rich tits.I could never imagine, see a movie of rhyme, which up to this point I animarade make a rhyming critic.A such Joshua dressed in Roman, not got you only manoa virgen de Visanteta, nine months trajoa Pavara a criajomás well criaja, that between legs had a rajaque his dinividad obstaculizaraque no waiter digs.The cure her wants to make Holy, although she prefers to play under the blanket.On the other hand, the guy Collons at night with I dissimulation, gives his wife in ass, leaving without complying with it its funcions.It has been the happy cheerful bone, the risotas have arrived, with what this film I recommend visionadoa all over the world.It may not be a wonder, though reminds me of the nocillaNo it is haute cuisine, either in the Bulli encontraráspero at home with your bread to the ass you shalt.PS: As the saying, in the ass or got to give me again.UY, not, as said St. Thomas, this and any criticism so more. |
2,173 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1909 | Iñaki Bilbao | El hombre con rayos X en los ojos (The man with X-ray eyes) | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Very good sci-fi film that has finished being an indisputable classic. | "Dr. James Xavier autoaplica his great and revolutionary invention: a serum capable of producing the vision by x-rays." "At the beginning everything is going well, but need to increase doses, thereby peligrará their vision."Very good sci-fi film that has finished being an indisputable classic. The reason is none other than the wonderful direction of Roger Corman, a man capable of making success any peliculilla on the role. It was with the help of the extraordinary contribution of Ray Milland, just great. Very good photography and superb sets, for a story with multiple readings where morals and ethics are of great importance. The ambition to go further and achieve more goals against the power of evil, the fascination for the forbidden. How far should it go to achieve our purpose?Interesting reflections narrated very entertaining and fascinating.The end of the film, unforgettable. |
2,174 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1064 | Caruco | Babel | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Only elitists and hollow images, untapped ideas and approaches to the navel. Do do do do more than? enraptured?, Iñárritu and Arriaga leave us? embabelados?. | If it is already difficult to reach an agreement between a couple, among a community of neighbors living under the same roof, or among the Group of co-workers sharing objectives; and in addition to speaking the same language, imagine what can happen on an international scale, in a "Babel" which is a mosaic of cultures, languages, interests and ways of acting. As film is the Magnum Opus of the Mexican Alejandro González Iñárritu, endowed with the ambition necessary to develop a project that leave footprints, supported in his usual screenwriter Guillermo Arriaga, an artist of the stories entrecruzadas, circulars and fragmented in terms of structure and space, physical and temporal. And together have given birth films like the magnificent "loves dogs", or the irregular "21 grams".In "Babel," from a banal fact, two Moroccan brothers that test the new rifle from his father, get tangled in children piques and end up shooting at a bus and injuring an American tourist. This will trigger an international incident, never narrated in the foreground, but citing diplomatic barriers and the spectre of Islamic terrorism. But above all will have consequences in characters and so apparently far away countries like Japan or the border territory between Mexico and California.El modern chaos.With regard to "Babel," they hear and read much the word "globalization". As well as what emerges from the film and the statements of the director about his intention of making a film about "the physical and language barriers" and ending up not in these pitfalls but also in "what unites us: love and pain". What is true, because in the end abound the inserts of joining hands and hugs.In addition, it must add other important issues, such as unpredictable of chance and fate, feelings of guilt, and a look at human stupidity. So Iñárritu stands, with this and their two previous titles, a chronicler of the "pain" and "human", more fortunate beings or not, with desire for transcendence."But despite having a very interesting material and ideas, what more remains in evidence is the pretentiousness, so empty and relamido that they break down this huge (artifice) tower that is"Babel,"and all the best intentions of Iñárritu and Arriaga.""Babel," we can get to reflect on many things, but more by his bombast or his careful photography, for the sincerity of his images and characters, which seem to operate more than by the blows of fate, a coup d ' état of script.Portraying the pain.And to make the message more clear, each of the varied characters players will have their moment, his great "pose" (carefully studied), pain and isolation in the form of a map or a scene Summit to look demonstrating that they are lost in these islets of global isolation than a J.J. Abrams Castaway looking for answers or foreign aid.There are many of these moments, but to highlight: Amelia (Adriana Barraza, and the best cast), an illegal nanny lost in the middle of the desert with a, so striking as grotesque, dressed in red wedding; Yasujiro (Koji Yakusho, the second best of the cast); a teenage sordomuda traumatized by the suicide of his mother, the inability to communicate with his father and obcecada with losing his virginity, alone and lost in a sea of people and noise of uan disco (not for her, as it undertakes to make us notice intermittent sound cuts); Chieko (Rinko Kikuchi, best male cast), supporting desolate in the elevator; or Richard (a Brad Pitt that no clashes, nor with the gray hair and wrinkles added), demonstrating their suffering that it should embrace his heartfelt wife (Cate Blanchett, shining even in minimal interventions) or grab the phone up the photogenic achieve more appropriate. Little life beyond. Only elitists and hollow images, untapped ideas and approaches to the navel. Rather than "enraptured" Iñárritu and Arriaga leave us "embabelados". |
2,175 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3697 | Iñaki Bilbao | 1408 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Entretendia but finally somewhat disappointing film of horror / fantasy. | Entertaining horror film more or less fantastic that however it remains clearly lower than it could have been.And it is not just by convincing at all, despite the fact that passes the time and the interest not lapses over the footage. A rather long footage for what counts, the truth.The best of the film, apart from its effective special effects is that the written script has gained shape film a short of the famous Stephen King story, lengthening with effects and situations a narrative that apparently didn't to tando.And do them it well until the last minutes, used the tension and supposed terror, with elements that appear slowly, getting a few impacts that are expressing as it progresses the argument. It is not that they are to throw rockets, but yes they entertain and do not you go the movie. But I think situations become at the end in excessive lengthening footage unnecessarily, until you reach a somewhat dull epilogue.For its part, the protagonist, an omnipresent John Cusack, does with his accustomed profesioanalidad, although sometimes it happens in their terror and panic before what happens. Let's say that more or less at the beginning, when cut with the window of the room, be it scares too much, when it was not yet to both, I think. But, of course, I say that it was sentadito comfortably in the armchair, in his case. And in addition, is not his fault, but the writer.Broadly is a film that gives the adopted and gets to the good, but limited, and may have reached the remarkable with a little more than imagination. But it is not bad. |
2,176 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/932 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Ciudad de Dios | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Holgado footage Meirelles leads with sobriety, without ever falling into free show a dramatic, unarmed context, instrumentalized and greedy violence for the accidental Viewer that creates watching a game of revenge. | The South American cinema road is paved with obstacles, but inevitably thrives, hangovers to the international balcony and ends up being desetiquetado film, orphan of parochial clichés, although his scripts to talk about what they have close and retraten life that have opposite.City of God is a masterpiece of South American cinema or the Brazilian film, but gives equal citizenship. Her would have liked theirs a Peckinpah high hours or the Scorsese with the Verve of the 1970s. We don't know if we are seeing a rapid cinema session of gangster to use or a western syncopation with urban scenarios of a 20th century already almost cancelled.More than three hundred characters of the novel of 600 and peak pages of Paulo Lins, I've not had the pleasure of reading, but I imagine addictive and deleitosa as tape, give to a loose footage Meirelles leads with sobriety, without ever falling into free show a dramatic, unarmed context, instrumentalized and violence greedy for the accidental Viewer that creates watching a game of revenge and shady environments to the Tarantino.Impresiona the likelihood of what we are seeing. One is very accustomed to watch American movies and to grant it merits, prestige and medals without any margin of uncertainty: City of God is probably the film more credible than this cronistahaya seen in a long time.Relates without modesty and restraint the birth of organized crime in the city of God, a neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro. The rapporteur, the omniscient eye, the demiurge of this choral, Greek, story times, is Buscapé, a child decides on the fringes of crime and who knows, in the background, sensitive, tender, artist. None of these labels at since well started the movie torcerán one iota: Buscapé fatigue the favela: a world of weapons of narco-trafficking bands subjected to strict codes of conduct and police purchased populate his universe.Articulated in three distinct parts, which can be seen without solution of continuity or rows in the plot that shows. That hopscotch oeuvre, the referenced elements come to a well known film, which feeds and to which taxed a tribute single, crude, almost invisible, but recognizable if they handled similar keys. It is the Italian neorealism (I saw the black-and-white films of De Sica in many episodes). It is the western (there is an epic of the revenge of the persecution of the destination as a single recognizable symbol in the lives of all her characters). It is Coppola, very tangentially, and his triumphant Godfather. Tarantino, it is inevitably with his urban Madness with its Vertigo of blood and grammatical thicket.Three decades ranging through the screen: all contain a label of the House: camera in hand, deliberate interruption of the consummation of a scene to finish later, desirability of artistic creativity and the Assembly. Buscapé is seeing how their world is crumbling: how your friends are falling and how Street ras is resolved differences among its neighbors. He only has a camera: his eyes are the camera and the lens is delivering us surprising, amazing images.Impresses, by unusual in European or (even more) American film contest of children and adolescents as vulgar thieves or drug addicts, or assassins. : Brazil it is the favela. In this lies the subtle difference between Hollywood models and the South American. The South, this being Brazil, there is also: and as we now know with more solid evidence, with a sharper truculence. Only there to follow the life of Zé small, one of the main characters of the story, to understand the hard life in the suburbs of poverty in this Brazil occupied by the misery and survival at all costs, with all risk.Lins has in his novel: "another, homeland without compassion, wind the laughter this soil gave me, this soil reached about men with boots and tools to measure everything, to mark the Earth." Then came the machines, which razed the orchards, frightened the hobgoblins, guillotinaron trees, terraplenaron swamp, dried up the source, and this became a desert (..) Emerged the favela, the cement neofavela, formed of mouths and sinister silence, with desperate cries in the run of the streets and the indecision of the crossroads "."Nature, was probably replaced by the progress. And with him, I conclude, came the gun, drugs, hate and darkness, although all paint with a huge, sharp, perfect, Harbor light of life. |
2,177 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1344 | Jesus Lens | Rocky Balboa | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A movie that appeals to nostalgia for a character that has had a decent Colophon, much better than the street fight with the grandson of John Wayne. | Two moments define perfection mean this Rocky Balboa sexagenarian of turn of the century. On the one hand, the end of the film, with the home recordings of tourists, in Philadelphia, climbing running the famous stairs and when come up, they are to jump in plan champion, throwing blows from boxing to air, emulating Rocky.A see. An exercise in honesty: you, you and you that you'd fighting against Apollo Cread and you have believed for a couple of hours than the cold war could win on a ring, if you go to the icy Philadelphia do not would do exactly like tourists at the end of "Rocky Balboa"? Something will be right?The other defining moment is marked by one of the television commentators, alborozado, when you cannot avoid a smile while he says: "I grew up watching Rocky Balboa fighting." "I never thought that he would have the opportunity to transmit one of their matches." And that is what happens to viewers, who never we considered the possibility, after that infumable Cairn which was "Rocky V" to see again to the Italian Colt uploaded in a ring.We go to movies, therefore in a kind of homage to a youth was that us and, suddenly, we get to the meeting in the form of expert Boxer and notorious example, well-meaning middle, majete apañao. And, look, Stallone has been smart enough to write a script simple, coherent and white glove in which all are well: whites and blacks, young and old, parents and children, the living and the dead.Written and filmed as an auto-homenaje to a character who is in the history of the film on their own merits (let us not forget that the first Rocky knocked at the Academy nothing less than the Taxi driver of Scorsese), "Rocky Balboa" makes you smile often, convinces with that philosophy of self-help on open it-path-in-the-life-a-blows and you excited with the expected training base hit pieces of meat, lifting of barrels of beer and esforzadas races under the snow, stairs up, to this music that all ritmillo left tatareando the film.A movie that appeals to nostalgia for a character that has had a decent Colophon, much better than the street fight with the grandson of John Wayne, and that, in the heat of the post movie beers, led us to good group of buddies, Paco, John, Henry, Nacho and Isaac, to remember those night evenings watching television, enjoying with TysonHollyfield, Foreman, De la Hoya, Chaves, Poli Díaz or Lenox Lewis.Y is that, in the end, the good of Rocky, as the grandpas of the announcement of a car, is right: there is no boxers as the then. |
2,178 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/513 | Robgordon | Monster house | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Captures the essence so well knew translate Zemeckis and Spielberg in the 1980s and is separated from the, ever more recurrent, spoof tone of computer-animated films, | Robert Zemeckis has always been a guy with huge curiosity for the evolution of special effects. The cartoons mixed successfully with human beings in "Who framed Roger Rabbit?", evolved techniques in the failed but appreciable "death I feel so fine" or becoming old images in "Forrest Gump". Zemeckis has always been fascinated by these means, managing to be one of the pioneers in the proper use and progression of them and composing fantastic stories that used the technique to create huge results and excellent entertainment films.In its latest evolution of technology, Zemeckis filmed "The Polar Express", tape in which, for the first time, the director saw as the technique is ate the content, leading to ruined Christmas good intentions of this film and the hope of his company, Warner Bros.. raise high figures with this product, something coming from a director as Zemeckis was, a priori, unlikely.With Tom Hanks as cobaya, Zemeckis used in "The Polar Express" the technique of performance capture, it was based on "scan" and literally digitized actors, thus achieving an entirely animated, but captured the live-action film. Despite this failure ("The Polar Express" was a film so managed as boring técnologicamente), Zemeckis decided to continue putting into practice this performance capture with "Monster House", in which gave the gallons to rookie Gil Kenan. "And next to them are Spielberg, in the role of executive producer.""Monster House" captures the essence so well knew translate Zemeckis and Spielberg in the 1980s, and is separated from the, ever more recurrent, spoof tone of the films of computer animation, established as one of the most successful films of this genre in the past two years.The history of "Monster House" is simple, but effective. A haunted house inhabited by an old malcarado devours anyone or anything that SBI with approaching her. A couple of curious children are continuously monitoring strangers and dangerous movements of that House.With this plot, which leads to a new spot the genre of the haunted houses, "Monster House" is dirigiendonos by a dizzying roller coaster of fun and joy to the purest style of the cinema of the 1980s. A film by lyrical, luminous and beautiful moments and sometimes scary, dark and evil. But always with a sense of the enviable rate.The screenplay by Dan Harmon, Rob Schrab and Pamela Pettler contains very well described characters, such as its two young protagonists, "D.j." and "Croquette" (a sort of "Gordi" of "The Goonies") that complement each other perfectly, with these fears of childhood and his desire for maturity, as well as its picturesque range of side as the old man Nebbercracker (excellent name for a character of a tape of these features)the pimping nanny or zamanfou this boyfriend. And also, with a beautiful "flashback" about women of Nebbercracker, who is a true delight.All this, together with its dialog boxes, the succession of exciting and attractive sequences that give rise to the full showcasing of motion capture technique and good do its Director, Gil Kenan, "Monster House" makes a wonderful and joyful work. Debtor's "The Goonies" but also to the cinema of Hayao Miyazaki (especially "Howl's moving Castle"). A tape with personality, that uses creativity and ingenuity in its blend of horror and adventure, forming a product of taste of small, older and especially those bred in between 1980 and 1990, which you can find the elements and the Basic constants of the film of his childhood and adolescence in the characters, situations and ambience of this film.Technically, "Monster House" is an admirable, and its background, truly rich film. It is one of the most original compositions from "Monsters, Inc." and an unstoppable divertimento as it could be this. There are no known actors or famous television in dubbing, or is used to parody easy. We have the tape of the year in the field of digital animation. And it is this that Steven Spielberg and Robert Zemeckis appear as Executive producers is always a pleasant news. |
2,179 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/959 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | El último tango en París | 5 | 5 | muchocine | The last tango in Paris is authentic film, although I don't know exactly what this mean: perhaps it is authentic because it gives no answers to open questions. This is the life of any form. | What happened to the last tango in Paris is reasonable unmatched in any other film of quality: they prevailed in some images in our collective memory and the rest are erased.The elevator where lovers are a vitamin lúbrico has been. Pubic very black and roughness of Jeanne (Maria Schneider), its often body, short legs, her face of girl and her big tits has been. The humiliation of the butter has been. The sunny apartment, his half solitude and its stark empty has been.What has been lost is a symbology, the spirit of Utopia, his literature. The background of his characters has been lost: the madness of his exisencia, the sad beauty of the stories that, in line with the meeting of the lovers, are composing the portrait of a world in decline, ridiculed by Bertolucci in the figure of the amateur director, filmmaker Jeanne pedante-novio, which represents what the own Bertolucci hated: the slimy filmpedantic and realistic at the time. Has someone thought about Goddard?The political commitment of Bernardo Bertolucci is dressed in the echo of the French may of their student revolts of the cultured and solidarity innocence of their liberated young. They were times in which culture was handled, perhaps for the first time in the 20th century, as a weapon and the words were thrown as bullets. What makes Paul (a cool Marlon Brando) is to talk about: their inner torment is verbalized, shamelessly informed the niña-amante that has been found and shared with him the loneliness, anonymity, as if they were ghosts.The last tango in Paris is authentic film, although I don't know exactly what this mean: perhaps it is authentic because it gives no answers to open questions. This is the life of any form. Paul is a tormented, a be vandalized (has enviduado; his wife has committed suicide, and does not want to build a new world) and a soul in continuous punishment that does not need to redeem itself, but that lampa to find someone with whom letting die, who entrust their most intimate litany. And then it appears when the sex and is in his grammar of sweat and silences where Paul and Jeanne achieved a full communication. Eros and Tanatos, embroidered on sex, as I said Serrat in the ' COPLA ' of their gigs the span, the eternal story of good and evil, of light and its reverse, not scary necesaramente life and death: this is what hides under clothing lovers, on the ground of the Parisian apartment with sunlight invading the screen."Amazed that the years have not subtracted one iota of strength to this film: a love more visceral by expereincia which means viewing has overcome its message, although it has all the papaletas to lose because it is very fundamentally, a need of a precise time film and understood that viewers who saw him in his Premiere were one greater amazement, a deeper reverence,.""Fucking God," says Paul under a bridge while a train passes. Paul does not want to know anything about the past of his casual lover. There are no names. There is no story. There is epidermis. There is a reshuffle has given enough headaches to the repressed and the prevailing censorship to have this film as the head of sin, with the voluptuous image of Jeanne in the bathtub, enjabonado by the hieratic Paul, burned in a winter afternoon tristísima and beautiful.Not shocked as then, thanks to the God beneath the bridge that Paul insulted, but leaves a sediment of anguish, stinging in the soul, which is where most escuecen all things.Words of philosophers of mesa camilla as nihilism and Existentialism to a simple remembrance of a dramatic Erotica or erotic drama film, but sex is the vehicle so that these characters touch the sky or touch bottom and end up in glory or hell. It matters little. Paris, however, taking many films, have this as a firm of its aura of decadent romantiscismo flag. Chapter necessarily apart is the Arch of social influence that the film produced at that time: I'm still fascinated by backed, parochial pathos of those españolitos in perpetual erection (Franco had missed inhibitors of the libido in the marshes was inaugurating) which were to the South of France to see a pussy and tits, sorry for the semantic recess, moreover, very useful. And above they spoke in French.These now are different times and others are the patetismos, provincial or not, that we inhabit, but one was paradigmatic of a situation embarrassing, obscurantist pollítica. Seems, in any case, the delay is already being souvenir in our history and all are in these days of openness in social and moral good awards for the liberal talente of our Government. Time was. Time will in future probably not distant to assess if we ran much or in the race we lost something valuable. It is then very difficult to us back, reandar the path and sharpen the view to see what lost.This is a simple film critic, a note about the past, not a furious editorial on the progress and their vices in a newspaper with circulation much editorial. |
2,180 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3921 | Francisco Bellón | Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Atonement: More Alla de la Pasión is a film, well carried, it could have been much more game thanks to the potential of its history and the quality of its players, said it in passing, are the remarkable thing of it. | Joe Wright can undoubtedly be satisfied itself, it has the honour of being the youngest filmmaker that has inaugurated one of the most important film plan in the world, the Mostra of Venice. Did it the month of August of last year with this Atonement, adaptation of the best-seller of Ian McEwan.Wright does not seem to fear the typecasting, since after pride and prejudice again with another romantic drama of time, this time in the England prior to World War II. Overflowing passion, jealousy, betrayal and all kinds of love troubles populate the screen, and will delight lovers of the genre. However, and despite the good manners that shows Wright, the film takes horror to boot. The British filmmaker takes the presentation of characters to the point of hastiar to the respectable. The fact of showing the same scene from two different perspectives of succession and not simultaneously is a decision very fortunate for the tempo of the tape. The technical aspects are very careful, although Dario Marianelli music is annoying and screeching on many occasions. Only the presence of a few brilliant James McAvoy, Keira Knightley and Saoirse Ronan keeps afloat the history and the interest of the viewer in it. As soon as there is the trigger for the plot, not arriving until the three quarters of an hour, the film back flight and acquires more force and packaging.Atonement: More Alla de la Pasión is a film, well carried, it could have been much more game thanks to the potential of its history and the quality of its players, said it in passing, are the remarkable thing of it. Hopefully Joe Wright continue learning the craft and in his third film get debugging a more classic style. |
2,181 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1324 | Jeremy Fox | Rocky Balboa | 2 | 5 | muchocine | If not for the final half-hour, we could be talking about a passable películilla. | After years of failure and no producers or managers who bet him, Sylvester Stallone has launched a recovery operation which aims to recover part of the lost glory.The first step in this process has been the realization of the sixth part of the adventures of the character more glory has been reported: "Rocky Balboa".Today it is hard to imagine it, but in 1976 Stallone, an actor and screenwriter unknown, conquered the Americans with the story of a small-time Boxer which presents the opportunity to celebrate the match of his life.It was the film United States, depressed after the defeat in the war of the Viet Nam needed. Stallone was nominated for best actor and original screenplay at the ceremony of the Oscars that year, something only achieved hitherto Charles Chaplin and Orson Welles with "The great dictator" and "Citizen Kane" respectively. The truth is that over time, these comparisons sound ridiculous but it was.For his return, Stallone has opted not to take risks and bet on insurance retaking the scheme of the first Rocky, at least at the beginning. Indeed, the first hour is quite more dignified than be expected and moves in a field not far from the independent low-budget drama. Thus, with containment, is how accomplished Stallone the best moments of the projection.The trouble is that in the final half-hour decides that you have to be satisfied to a certain type of Viewer (who cannot be satisfied so? I wonder I) and begins a montage chaotic, confusing and meaningless that eliminates completely excitement that could raise the more than predictable outcome of the tape.If not for the final half hour, could be talking about a passable películilla, despite its flaws, but size final nonsense, and the fact that over no auction history definitely (to do this better that I had not done anything) do me tip the balance towards a clear hold. |
2,182 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3295 | Patri | El camino de los ingleses | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Note that this film is a very personal project of Antonio Banderas and why is an experiment carried out with the freedom of someone who has nothing to lose. | The Camino de los Ingleses summer some young boys in the Malaga of the 1970s, focusing on a player you just be operated and in the hospital has known a man that has marked so he decides to become a poet, obsessed with the Divine Comedy of Dante.La second film directed by Antonio Banderas is one of those films that you love or hate, which is done with a tone that can get tired enough, if not maintained an open attitude to her, that poetry pervades every moment of this film and each image giving rise to a set of images between dreamy and poetic that they can be very beautiful but also something exhausting. Note that this film is a very personal project of Antonio Banderas and why is an experiment carried out with the freedom of someone who has nothing to lose. Most of the actors are known for his work in television, as Fran Perea, that here makes the best role of her career, because so far it had not known for being a good interpreter, and comparing the work done in 13 roses with this it shows a great difference, perhaps Antonio Banderas was able to get his best performance, or perhaps a good actor who has not had the opportunity to prove it. It will have to wait to find out. |
2,183 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2328 | Rafa Delgado | Transamerica | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Felicity Fuman doesn't disappoint. The actress is without doubt, the main attraction of the film. | I hate the "road movies". Since that my film buff sense got reason (or at least the minimum that is) that I could not with them. Most will make me very, very cansinas. Do perhaps is why which?Transamerica? I have not filled what I expected, but that I liked enough to give the go-ahead. He is another road movie, but with an argument quite peculiar and interesting, and free of clichés.The most splendid Felicity Huffman (did Lynette Scavo in?)(Women desperate?) It makes a papelón portraying a transsexual woman, while waiting to arrive finally the long-awaited day in which will be subject to a genital reconstruction surgery, discovers that he has an illegitimate son of 18 years, and embarks on a journey with him to know him better.The main attraction of this film are undoubtedly its actors. The vast majority meet far. But that more shines with their own light is, as I have said before, Felicity Huffman. Actrizaza where they exist, never disappoints. Without any hesitation, I affirm and reaffirm that it is the jewel in the Crown and the main attraction of the tape of?Transamerica?. No doubt was a great injustice not won the Oscar for best performance 2005, being "overtaken" by Reese Whiterspoon, female protagonist who won the statuette for her role in?In tightrope?.?Transamerica? It is a quite suggestive, nice movie and something sweet and sour, which sets out the two sides of the coin of what supposed to be transsexual in United States in authority. He is also a notable exhibition that you can do good cinema with only four hard in the Pocket. Recommended and absolutely must see it in original version. |
2,184 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3826 | Andrés Pons | Equus | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Sadomasochism, sex, dementia, religious Fervor and if they press me something zoophilia disguised in a work shot with the bowels of some interpreters and delivered in one of the crazy director more beautiful and inspiring that reflects multiple readings. | A play called EQUUS by PETER SHAFFER writer caused havoc in the 1970s, a good scandal thanks to a history full of madness where topics as tricky as the passion, religious fervor, not exempt from violence sexual misunderstanding was the ultimate expression.Surprising is that a director who at the time enjoyed the compliment of all global criticism with successes of the caliber of SERPICO, A ruthless world or afternoon of dogs involved in a very risky project.A HOLLYWOOD legend added to the project in the face of RICHARD BURTON's great protagonist of the celluloid masterpieces. The night of the iguana, the robe or Cleopatra gave him immortality accompanied by a young and unknown actor PETER FIRTH was not too fortunate career despite the talents deployed in TESS or JOSEPH ANDREWS finishing on television and in very supporting roles.On the translation to the screen we see a faltering start with a mise en scene similar to the movie, a not entirely fluent narrative that can lead to thinking in the viewer that is perhaps a failed attempt to engage the original spirit of the text. Suddenly everything starts to change, the tone rises quickly, the two main performers are beaten in a memorable duel, the story takes an unusual force at each level reaching a final part that leaves you totally noqueado.EQUUS is a confrontation of two beings adrift, a life that in the eyes of the rest is ordered but the psychiatrist suffers a routine that devours it inside in a world that did not dare to challenge, discovers the passion in his patient patient who despite his madness to managed to claim a life force that took him to distress for parents on protectors and a mother enveneno you I the mind of religious facts which the young confused in his relationship with horses.A cheap film without paraphernalia faces two different worlds but at the same time they collide in a freedom that the two characters yearn unsuccessfully.Sadomasochism, sex, dementia, religious Fervor and if they press me something zoophilia disguised in a work shot with the bowels of some interpreters and delivered in one of the crazy director more beautiful and inspiring that reflects multiple readings.Certainly a risk that the current film is not allowed and why these works are today almost unique in a world that gives back to the true art in favour of easily digestible mediocrity for the $. |
2,185 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2527 | Tito Chinchan | Harry poter y el caliz de fuego | 3 | 5 | muchocine | I was expecting too much for the little that I found. Possibly, if you're going with moderate expectations, you'll see a peliculón (as my medium kiwi) but if you go with large illusions, you will be slightly squashed. In addition I it has become short. | My small chicks, the tito Chinchan will give a d.o. for free, just for reading this criticism. If you want to go to the cinema, Tuesday is an ideal day. About 30 people, were seeing Europe's largest screen so only us has lacked the blanket to be at home. The downside is that the service is far and that he can't stop. In addition my medium kiwi has not left me see the movie in gayumbos not be why.The film is about one year in Hogarts, the fourth, in which Harry already have hairs in some pubic area and Hermione have left you breasts. Begins with the world of quidich competition (as written), in which some strange events do not finish as expected (no, not kill Spain in the quarter of irregular way, more rare I mean). This year in Hogarts seems that they do not give classes, given that other students in two foreign colleges have come, a French girls school which release petals of flowers by walking and other rough Nordic more gross than a "Guillemot". And that is all about.I will not say that the film is the darkest and the most adult of all, given that says it all over the world. What if I say this is the one to less magic. It is not not have large doses of special effects, which you have everywhere, is that it has no worldly magic. To not appear only in class, don't these tricks which gave it a very magical air films. The usual characters do not have almost appearances, or Hagrid, Professor, Professor Severus or almost none. Focuses almost entirely on Harry, Hermione and a new teacher who has an eye for everything to 100. Moreover, incredible landscapes and amazing, special effects of scandal (the scene of the Dragon will be difficult to match) and an incomparable environment. But I is not over fill.In short, I expect much for the little that I found. Possibly, if you're going with moderate expectations, you'll see a peliculón (as my medium kiwi) but if you go with large illusions, you will be slightly squashed. In addition I it has become short.Besitos.P.D: Hormones and pheromones floating in such a way in the air that have left me breasts.Pd2: I'm a superfan of Hermione, it should be called "Hermione, Harry's fool and the calyx of fire". I think Mania I'm picking up.P.D.3: by the way, that leaves "that your already know" which seems that it went through Corporation dermoestética.P.D.4: Hogarts has undergone certain changes, especially structural. |
2,186 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/870 | Pablo López | Sin city | 5 | 5 | muchocine | This is without a doubt the most faithful adaptations of a comic (or graphic novel) to the film, and as such, we must understand its aesthetics, its history, its excesses and its shortcomings. | Having seen this film three times (one need, for commitment and the last by boredom) I think that I can show you fearlessly to doubt my most sincere opinion on this new work by Robert Rodriguez, who after the El Mexicano shit back through the front door in nothing (neither was very difficult, because the original was already very good and even more if the author himself co-directs).Leaving aside the polemics on fidelity to the comic of 'Batman Begins' I think we can say that this is without a doubt the most faithful adaptations of a comic (or graphic novel) to the film, and as such, we must understand its aesthetics, its history, its excesses and its shortcomings.On the stories. What to say, you may like more or less, you can move more or less, but there are, as Frank Miller devised them in his head years ago, are exactly as described the comics and not take any granting extra. the script went cheap to the Mr Rodríguez. Another aspect in which neither is esnucó was in the storyboard. With deficiencies may have the celluloid to the role in color themes and contrasts applies that aesthetics in general photography in particular are actually achieved, and is calcan levels of the vignettes of the novels here yes, giving some concessions on the color of certain scenes and characters.A Mickey Rourke makes himself, Bruce Willis in State of grace and a Clive Owen showing what is led by a cast of truffled star of new and old glories showing his side more hooligan and wild giving life to the sinful characters from the novels of Miller. Nobody stands out over others in this distribution of multitude of characters, because, ultimately, and although it is not politically correct, everyone loves to be bad.Finally, only point one thing all those people who has not read the books. An adaptation may seem more than one comic book, but I assure you that it is not, read books and comprobaréis, because Sin City is not an adaptation to the proper use, but a simple translation to images of this populated universe, because Sin City already was film before this project existed. |
2,187 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/919 | Matías Cobo | El camino de los ingleses | 2 | 5 | muchocine | We welcome the ambition of originality that exudes all the work of the Malaga, but both poetic desire as a whole becomes a wrapper of luxury too cold. | I applaud risks in sunsets in scene managers able to dip the visual lyricism to support their stories, and thus escape from the conventions of the, almost always effective, classical narrative. But I understand that go to recherché frames, images slowdowns or the shooting of dreamy sequences must be justified and must whether on the set of the film gently. Antonio Banderas director likes to take risks as demonstrated in this tape in which used narrative formulae diametrically opposed to those seen in his work as an interpreter. Notice you the tables of a gifted student who has learned in the best school possible, the American cinema, but perhaps lack the necessary restraint to balance form and content. To the camino de los ingleses, a tape that is a conventional story from a point unconventional view, they drag a few Visual excesses that perhaps have been more content or have sustained a history of larger vessels, would have completed a round film. But, unfortunately, the result of the second work as a filmmaker of the Malaga has been half way.The camino de los ingleses is an introspective portrait of youngsters whose lives cross by trance which mediates youth and maturity, a stage of elections, but, above all, resignations pushed by the icy clash with reality. The protagonist, Miguelito, you change your view of life a cultured man who will meet in the hospital during his hearing after a kidney operation. This man at the gates of death will be shown to Miguelito towards an inner world that give you access reading and poetry. To his departure from the clinic he reencontrará with his world, with his work in a hardware store and a late 1970s Malaga neighborhood friends. But something has changed in the relationship with them. It was determined to be a poet and will repeat it to those they see while walking his inseparable exemplary of the divinia Dante's comedy. His gang of friends also passes by existential doubts of mixed caliber, but sharing with Miguelito the desire for feel life with sparkling intensity of youth that still treasure. I.e., that front a reality that repeated them machaconamente what little that are and how little that will become, they cling to a burning clove to your dreams.The choice of a cast of young actors and little known is also a decision risks that, in this case, yes it has taken advantage flags by the implication that denote all of them in each sequence. Alberto Amarilla, last known television, and a great Raúl Arévalo, already discovered in the remarkable AzulOscuroCasiNegro, embody the main male roles, while newcomer María Ruiz and Marta Nieto assume the weight of the female cast. In addition, secondary luxury such as Victoria Abril and Juan Diego completing acting work, in general, bordering at high altitude. In the same way it happens with the score composed by Antonio Meliveo or precocious photography signed by Xavi Giménez. Both elements, along with mounting tape, the aesthetic frames of some planes or the repeated inclusion of dreamy sequences, become a personal bet that flags maybe has failed contain enough tape. As I said at the beginning, it is appreciated the ambition of originality that exudes all the work of the Malaga, but both poetic desire the set becomes a wrapper of luxury too cold. |
2,188 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1467 | Ibán Manzano | Juegos secretos | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Suburban, sad, painful, pieces removed from behind the porch and presented under a common denominator, the eyes of a child that we strive to ignore. | Before even of that in its prodigious final stretch the pieces of Little Children fit, his characters ago time is revealed as part of a piece of higher life. Suburban, sad, painful, pieces removed from behind the porch and presented under a common denominator of the attentive, almost disturbing look of a child that we strive to ignore, with what this entails Dodge step to our future. Is why this film of moans and silences, of truths to mezza voce, of stories that collide (as the toy trenecitos) and fragments that are reflected on the other (the police in the exhibitionist and this in turn in the lovers), is the example of as the cluster of our mistakes ends suffering it who less blame. There is but the child molester whose crime is wanting too much to the children, and they are there too, to the other side of the neighborhood, parents whose crime, less punishable but by no means more excusable, is the of not wanting to them enough. But there is no limit Little Children to reflect on the suffering of the child, nor to thinking out loud about how the 30 still maturing, on the other hand if we must understand it as a faithful portrait of our facility to escape from happiness. With its (GBR) noise and silent staging, this lesson of life (s), in which the parents presented as only difference with their children the demanding love rather than deliver it, recounts the common wander from a few people that just leaving them clear that anyone who claimed that falling in love was thing of children had more reason which he himself thought. We're then adults to complicate everything. |
2,189 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/23 | Jose Contreras | Crash | 3 | 5 | muchocine | What pasta is one made? | When a survey wants to know if a group is racist he asked not directly; It makes indirect, such as questions, if the interviewee seem you well his daughter to marry a black man. And it is that one thing is to say that one is not racist and another thing is not to be. It happens with everything. It is always said that one does not know has few friends until seen in a hurry.Haggis has made a film about what people think and what they can do. It has gathered a bunch of characters United by more or less fine threads; It has left confronted with racist abuse throughout the film and then he's gone proving that pasta are made, and putting them in compromising situations.Some characters change in front of us, while we hope, others discover a side of themselves that neither they knew. In a few it is noble, in other infamous. The plot of the Hispanic girl is unlikely if one contrasts it with a newscast, but the film has its own rules, the film only requires anticipation. When a lie is ready does not accept it. The lies we bother if they aren't grammatical.The only error I see in Haggis is in its way to distribute what counts. The first time builds up too much distress. Hopefully the worst of each character. All are on the brink of the abyss. The final uncovers one after the other letters and will alleviate the tension. I think that history he would have favored some respite in the approach. |
2,190 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1986 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Megavixens up! | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Apotheosis of film of female despendoladas, ubérrimas, designed to be pin-up poster of box office of soldier, but personal, care, worthwhile film when it was checked and how he battled towards his corner in the history of the seventh art. | This is not a fairy tale and there are at least a couple of good reasons to confirm it. The voice of Greek chorus (Kitten Natividad) who is narrating the vicissitudes of the film desataviada of textile prejudices, rotunda in charms that disgustarían not a Botero to diet to your models or a Rubbens aware in the aerobic power, announces that this is not a porn voyeurism of the three to the fourth. Russ Meyer is the King of the nude: not one. Their carnal demands are always by the same thread: mammary exuberance. Don't need no other dramaturgical preparation. Their actresses are females of the common people have been blessed by a runaway hormonamiento. Already. And they are out there, by deserts, fields of wheat, for short rental apartment motel smell sweat, and nicotine by coniferous forest, running without decorum. Because running, that knows well Meyer, breasts rise and fall and that monotone choreography (although hypnotic) raises the interest of the male spectator, prototype of the viciosillo movie buff, delighted you brighten eyes with this recital of bodies ubérrimos, unbound, accomplices in a lust soft, stubborn in his lack of shame to tell us that the world is full of problems and probably sex desastaca the brain of the Earwax of stress.Megavixens Up! It is the quintessence of the genius of Meyer. Overwhelming meat, surreal delusions as a perfect instrument of Adolf Hitler (later killed by a Piranha) looking for orgasm with a multidotado ephebe in a mansion of Empress Sissi or exotic ladies of tremebundo chest and pubis ogres company service. The film runs through predictable places: lumberjacks brutotes in search of beer, and while, corrupt sheriffs who see any bend in the way occasion for the wild fornication, genital links filmed with playful and unprejudiced morality and, above all, generous portions of glossy bodies, grown by mother nature without the modern competition the silicone. Let us not forget that we are in the early 1970s.It will not find the gentle reader is inherent to this incendiary context pornography. We will not see any sexual intercourse: everything is unspoken (and how) but this detail is not subject to its sweep of field. Icon of the film underground or nuddie, Meyer is an author with an absolute mastery of the medium of film. In this it differs from ordinary commercial eroticism or porn white workers or hard that feeds the shelves of the video shops or extreme content of certain channels of payment programs. Meyer is a perfectionist, an author with a language immediately detectable. And I am not referring to the curves of his heroines: in all his films are very serious portraits of the always call profound America which already in force to be so told machaconamente, has ceased to be. Slums of road, on the edge of the cartoon characters or invariably caricatured features soundtracks...Author total, was not only responsible for directing: was also writer, cinematographer and producer of his daydreams. He died at the age of 82, proud of his humour, oblivious to who ninguneó for life have been making the same film (and rolled 30). Kitten Natividad, Babette Bardot, Lori Williams, Haji, Uschi Digart or Erica Gavin were his body of dance, his army of females, the pin-ups in the back of the Playboy (whom was eventual photographer in his youth) recruited and that was usually rejected by excessive. The public was content with minor monumentalidades and wasn't well regarded this maximalism unless had a worthwhile piece of paper (of Fund) (example: Jane Mansfield).The colourful film desparpajo, its lust almost naïve, still resists the passage of time. Pulling more two tits than two carts, reads the Hispanic adagio, but these here described are not normal tits: the proposal is subversive. The malairado group of feminist women in one or another occasion have whipped his film have not warned the bellicose, independent, strong and radical nature of its protagonists, who are never mere inflatable dolls. Anything, are less submissive to the way in which are women porn, or in one lower tone, which have built the erotic film since that Hedy Lamarr leaving weaned of the Lake in black and white.The Edition retains this scribe is on vhs, although her now I've restored to dvd so the years not mistreat. Her issued a decade ago a regional television in very late hours and with adult film fanfare. It is, of course, but not usually mistakenly go escorting insignificant film interest zafiedades, aimed only at encabritar the noble bruising parties, film jamaipanese urgent kleenex. There are movies, cult film, if you prefer. And future generations will laugh or looked or discussed, as here now, the legitimacy of a single author (there is No other: Tinto Brass is crude, but it shares a very similar icons prontuario with Meyer and both have a recognizable language). |
2,191 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1349 | Tito Chinchan | Big fish | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Essential film in any deuvedeteca self-respecting. A delicious work of perfect manufacture, with a script full of intimate and emotional moments and outstanding. To see a thousand times. | Tim Burton is a very peculiar film, at least for me. It makes very strange films, of incredible and absurd characters scenarios. He may like you or not, but we must acknowledge the originality and quality of their work. And every movie that passes, I think that you get much better top it off. In addition, his films do not lose validity over the years, are completely timeless. Gives equal when they asked, have such quality that they can be immortal, as is demonstrated in Big Fish.La film is about a man who tells stories that seem little real. Stories incredible and impossible that everybody dazzle. To all? Well, unless all your child than on the verge of being a father, is has enough of the "lies" of his father. It seems unfair that he had to live his father involved in this charade that creates and why he hates. Reaching the end of the life of the account tales, they meet again, and this time something has changed.Puff, what about Big Fish? It has a start something slow, with a multitude of stories incredible arriving to be even "lacking imagination" in absurd resulting. But as the story progresses, and discovers that not everything is false, that the protagonist does nothing more than adorn the reality, that enrich the facts to make them more attractive, the film manages to trap you in their networks. Get get you that sensitive vein that we all have, to make us ready for a very emotional ending that unleashed the most basic emotions. Tim Burton since then me has already taken the measure.In short, essential film in any deuvedeteca self-respecting. A delicious work of perfect manufacture, with a script full of intimate and emotional moments and outstanding. To see a thousand times. |
2,192 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3827 | Ana Belén Pacheco | El espía | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A very dignified and recommended film that manages to keep intact the thriller with twists care quite notable performances. | In 2001 after an incredible investigation ended to the biggest mistake in the FBI intelligence services stopping Robert Hanssen, apparently a careful Christian, a great worker and a spotless agent which ensured the security of the networks of the Buro. Eric O'Neill will be in charge of spying on its head. This will depend on that you an end to the filtration and possibly their future in the FBI as agent secret take-off. They are the basic ingredients to make a good spy movie. One of these has no unnecessary gunfire and international travel, i.e. something that can be the viewer attractive and appealing, but is based on real events which gives one some tranquility within the narrative.Billy Ray, the director has already had contact with real life stories with his debut in 2003 with "The price of truth" (Ribbon that I enjoyed about way) and recalled in this way. Get the camera on your site and not abuse of unnecessary resources for the approach of its history. It is also the screenwriter of the film for what can blame you the only weak point of this, the little care to the relationship between the character of Ryan Philippe with his wife who could have completed a round plot.Anyway is a very dignified and recommended film that manages to keep intact the thriller with twists care quite notable performances.Conclusions after seeing the Film: Laura Linney is omnipresent, he has managed to sneak into almost all films 2007 dignity and almost always correctly.The bigoted weakling and attractive Ryan Philippe of Studio 54 has won in interpretation but also in kilos (such as thirty if I get to calculate) Chris Cooper is superb and gives credibility to his character in one of the best performances of the year 2007. |
2,193 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1914 | Oscar Cantero | Amor Idiota | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A movie in which strengths and weaknesses have a similar weight, and resorted to the usual clichés of Ventura Pons. | I cannot say that he is an admirer of Ventura Pons. In fact, has always seemed that his work often suffer from some provincial localism, and that somehow it hides some of the eternal complexes (I've never had very clear whether superiority, inferiority or half and half) of Catalan culture, permanently committed to mark a sometimes fictitious differences with the rest of the country.In any case, and precisely because of this desire to individualizador, the Catalan director has always been at the forefront in terms of technical narratives and filming techniques, which on the other hand always arouses the curiosity of the fan.Idiot love tells the story of a man of class media, Professor, that one night a woman who works displaying announcers posters of lampposts, encountered by chance and falls madly for her, arriving to commit outrages by approaching his beloved.The interpretation of Cayetana Guillén Cuervo as say Risto Mejide, is flat, while Santi Millán don't think he's an actor so worthy of praise as lately they seem bent on making us believe. In any case, the presenter of Spanish version has an undeniable attraction that seems to maintain immutable over the years and with which gives a special dose of curiosity to the committed sex scenes that are always present in the films of Ventura Pons.En the technical side, seem excessive to the point of evading, using the zoom and sudden changes of plans, and also some abuse of the narrative can be seen in first person with their pseudofilosóficos text messages. Script not may be denied it is imbued with the agility of its director, although you finf absurd at times.In general, a film in which good and evil can almost equate, and whose viewing won't be a waste of time but not excessive satisfaction will bring the Viewer. |
2,194 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2858 | Jesus Lens | La Jungla 4.0 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The case is the jungle, in its zero point version, an exemplary film that baby television and globalized modernity that go hand in hand then hero and heroes now. | We showed suspicion, so long ago days, to the latest installment of the saga of the Crystal jungle, one of those film series that we like and taking part in our sentimental education. Sentimental education not strictly film incidentally step.We all know that John McClane was a cynical and half finished, type carrier this aesthetic of the loser that we love so much. Poorly spoken, violent, politically incorrect and, moreover, smoker. A pity of man, are going. His first on-screen appearance dates from 1988, nothing less. Of the things that have happened in the world since then! Of the fall of the iron curtain the planetary globalisation, twenty years is a lifetime. Playing with this change in geopolitical scenario, cultural and cybernetic, producers of the saga of the jungle crystalline, after giving rest to its protagonist for thirteen years, so rescue the ostracism and, thus, before his film Renaissance, it is reasonable to show concern. What will become of McLane in these years? Because the promotional images shows it quite whole piece and compact, solid and a piece. Is there hamburguesado? Will become politically correct? Will have it left the tobacco?The answer, in "The jungle 4.0", a title that it is already quite illustrative and that, from the outset, put their cards face up. Let's start with the bad. You are these bad very bad but, at the same time normalísimos. Nothing of disfigured mutant or crazy eccentrics. No. The bad are a compact group of Jasper, very handsome and ready them. And its purpose: total chaos, of course. A terrorist attack of cybernetic character which, in addition to making them rich, subvertirán the world order as we understand it.Perhaps a boot like this may sound them. More than teléfilos lovers. Does it not a true aroma of this series which, supposedly, happening in real time? Quickly we turn to the hero, who has trouble with a daughter who denies him, without solution of continuity, present us with a kid and anonymous, vulgar and current, but with a special talent, in this case for computers and that from the beginning is in the crosshairs of the bad guys.And the story is already mounted. What we are in a recognizable scenario? Pay attention to what they said Willis in an interview: "so many characters have been based on McClane is normal." For example Jack Bauer. "Kiefer Sutherland is doing a great job by drawing upon the jungle."Given what was like before, if the chicken or the egg. The case is the jungle, in its zero point version, an exemplary film that baby television and globalized modernity that go hand in hand then hero and heroes now. Because the prominence of the film is two-fold. In the best tradition of the Buddy-movies, McClane helps and is helped by a spontaneous fellow, a hacker for whom the character played by Willis is a dinosaur who, in turn, looks at the genius of computers as if it were a Martian.And this dialectic between the digital and the analog hero moves throughout the film, halfway between the spoof and the chaotic. In that regard, the sorcerer, character played by one of the gurus of modernity, Kevin Smith, is paradigmatic: its operations center is the most modern in the world, but there is a radio transmitter of the of all life, which will be the only thing that works when everything is going to hell because of the cíberterorrismo.And it is the action, in spades. And violence, less explicit than other times. And humor, more acidic and corrosive. And the beatings which fall you to McClane. As always. And, therefore, we have a great movie. Modern and classic at the same time, in the best sense of both expressions. A little long, perhaps. And hyperbolic and excessive, of course. But it is that, even in its zero point version, we are still in "The jungle of glass". |
2,195 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/130 | Alvaro Oliva | Hostel | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film of the pile that will delight lovers of the genre | Hand in hand with Quentin Tarantino, Eli Roth presents a new version of the classics of the horror film, in which a group of young ends up in a little village in which nothing is what it seems and that won't them be easy escape. Normally the scenario used to set these films usually deep America, but in this case and to give a more exotic touch have decided to move to Europe, specifically to Eslovaquia.El origin of the film comes because Roth they commented that there is the possibility of killing someone for 10,000 dollars. This is possible (or so they say) in Thailand, Act followed Roth was petrified and thought that it would be a perfect argument for his next movie. After these comments you can already imagine the argument: a group of kids (two Americans and an icelander) run through Europe in search of sex and being in Amsterdam them recommend go to a small Slovak town where beautiful women become mad by foreigners, especially by the Americans. As it was predictable, our protagonists are in your search, and also in a predictable way, will find much more than sexual pleasure.I have to say and thank that the film is not as strong as they sell it. It has your doses of guts, but it isn't that abounds more nor the most unpleasant ones, that what is really scary is that facts may occur in reality as those who tell us, and to some extent it would be easy they deliberately.Eli Roth tells us anything new, nor innovates in a quite exhausted genre, but it makes a review of classics such as the Texas Chainsaw Massacre including some ingredients of Asian film. In this regard is to comment on the cameo by director Takashi Miike (one of the greatest exponents of the genre) playing a sadistic client from the hunting of luxury. There is nothing to highlight, except the beauty in the flat acting and discovery of the actress Czech Barbara Nedeljakova, that the portrait of the characters is nothing of the topic.It must be said that Roth combines at certain times the horror with comedy, giving a couple of touches of black humor are welcome. A good contribution, who knew perfectly exploit Chicho Ibáñez-Serrador, is the figure of the child entity and personification of evil, being them the protagonists of a couple of great moments of the film.There are two very different parts: the first devoted to show the travel and behavior of the protagonists and already a second in which happiness becomes horror. Jay Hernandez is the only that has a role somewhat more dynamic and profound, it tells us a fact he had when he was young and that later will try to redeem, thus demonstrating an act of value that many others had declined. But despite this it remains one mere character more, rather flat. Tarantino and his team have been able to sell the bike, because many people have the idea that it is another great film, and when they see the title that accredits the direction the creator of Cavin Fever then are a disappointment. Another point in its favor has been the way to advertise it as the work more beast lapped ever, which will drag to many young and not so young, to see what they expect to be the most bloody feast in the history of the cinema. In short, a film of the pile that will delight lovers of the genre and that will surprise the new generations. Finally say that they do you not very good Slovakia, and as a curiosity advertising comment that there are many Americans that are wondering if there really is this country of Eastern Europe. If it is that at the end as in Spain anywhere. |
2,196 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1868 | Silvia Giner | El número 23 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Jim, is little credible in this film, although note the effort made by the actor to interpret a role outside their usual records. Conclusion, do not waste your time and your money with this firecracker and rent Gilda in the video store. | Many expectations I had I created with this film, many of which came down when Jim Carrey was consolidated in the title role.The myth of the number 23 is something any friki computer knows, something so widespread by the network that reaches almost become a religion. Much has been said about this, has written and it has addressed, i.e. This is not the first film nor the last on the emblematic number but is probably the worst.If you expect to shed light to the myth, not to go see the movie because what you'll find is a pseudo-psycho movie, with pretensions of discover you something that fails, staying in a mere history of serie B in which the prota plays double borderline personality.Although the Assembly (mostly innovative) but with an estilillo that my I like, it is acceptable, sometimes this type of mounting excess causes a slight "dizziness". We are back to the levels of those of reverie that director (Joel.) (S) we are accustomed. Within the mental straws of Joel.S this is perhaps the least intense (thank God, pq after the Phantom of opera thought delirious starving by the torpor) but still wants to this boy think something that isn't, doesn't know to do and above makes it wrong. Joel, Joel Joel, when are you going to realize that there are also beauty in simplicity and that your films appear to a Meringue with double ration of Strawberry Jam?For my talk of the number 23 it is not talking about an encounter with a person and this number which is what narrates the film. Therefore failed film. 23 should have been much more, I do not know I can think of a thousand ways of looking at it, but good.Let's talk about friend Jim. Dios but even when I have to support this? see Jimy, read carefully. You've spent years consagrandote as this comic actor was which you has led logically to a typecasting hard hard as steel. You have enrriquecido, you have been comfortable in your routine, and now after you create in our minds a picture of absolute asshole makes us laugh, do want seem very serious and compelling? No, no, no, I'll tell you it will cost much time and many clunkers as 23 settle you as something more than an excellent actor for comedy, almost as much as that has cost you become what you are. Patience, I support you!Jim, is little credible in this film, although note the effort made by the actor to interpret a role outside their usual records, but we still lack some passion or enturage or X factor finally believing it to us.Conclusion do not waste your time and your money with this firecracker and rent Gilda in the video store. |
2,197 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/74 | Beatriz Perez | Transamerica | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Masterful performance by Felicity Huffman | Since that saw the trailer of?Transamerica? do already I can't see equal?Desperate women?. The makeup of Felicity Huffman in the film helps it seems someone who previously was man, but their own factions are somewhat masculine and especially when you make some gestures, it is difficult to see Lynette as a woman. Probably, her husband in real life, William H. Macy, protagonist of?Do murder?, are not the same. To finish the mixture, the character of Huffman in?Transamerica? do is called Bree, as another of the?Desperate housewives?, to which gives life Marcia Cross. Despite the title of the film and that your advertising has focused on this aspect, the central argument of?Transamerica? It is not transsexuality, but the encounter between a person and the son who did not know he had. Difficult encounter by the secrets both have been saved and the revelations of truths that are disappointing. But these secrets and lies could be others and the movie would have exactly the same pattern. Do occurs as in?Do Brokeback Mountain?, where the central argument is not homosexuality, although trafficking at least more than here transsexuality but the story of an impossible love for social issues. The word?Transamerica? not only tells us the change of sex, but also a side trip to one from a country that is changing according to Bree and Toby are proceeding on his journey. Due to this treatment of road movie, and the sentimental plot of p/mother and child reunion, the film reminds a TV movie. The end happy, slightly sweetened and too reconciliatory also brings closer it to this format, which does not end of fall thanks to the quality of its realization and interpretations. The doubly transform Felicity Huffman, as well as achieve a masterful performance, get a gesture, a profile that seems to be a transsexual. Paradoxically, when it takes less makeup and you can not take hormones, it is when it shows that it is a woman. For this reason, perhaps it might arise if it would not have been wiser to that paper embody it a true transsexual, it is less common to have characters for them and this movie could have been a great opportunity for an actress that a change of sex has been practiced. Like in the movie?The hours?, be could have given a chance for a little gracious actress, because they usually have less chance of being movie stars, rather than makeup and afear Nicole Kidman. However, it seems that the "harder still" is one of the preferences of the industry American and, especially, Oscar (see it?)Do Forrest Gump??Does rain Man?,?(Do girl, interrupted?, etc.). Is therefore quite likely that we see Huffman climb the stairs and pick up a new trophy to join his Emmy for?Women desperate?. |
2,198 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2164 | Tito Chinchan | Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Film that is completed? Pirates of the Caribbean saga. It is quite long, although the final result is good. We have less more action and more Sparrow, and there are plenty love, honors and demases. | Notice to the impatient that rise the two seconds to finish the film, there is one scene at the end of the closing credits. Such as when shark it protruded a fin of the sea. Of which tell you that maybe we have quarter. By the way, take this opportunity to tell those who stood before, to be, but that does not remain standing, if you have behind you are interested in credits, right?The film is about a group of pirates who are being harassed by the English Navy and by the Dutch Errante, a Ghost ship whose crew is men with aspect of marine animals. To get rid of so heavy burden, the pirates are at the end of the world, to rescue Jack Sparrow, then devise a plan that gives them the freedom to hack to taste again.Well, the third installment of the pirates I was not disappointed, but I has become extremely long. But inhumanly long. It has good moments of struggles, shots, espadazos and good sense of humor, but very long. Too much. The plot is not bad, but too lost in something secondary stories, depriving us of what really we want, are fighting and action. It is that even in the action scenes we peñazo pieces of charloteo on the divine and the mundane.In short, film that is completed? Pirates of the Caribbean saga. It is quite long, although the final result is good. We have less more action and more Sparrow, and there are plenty love, honors and demases.You might better, of course.kisses. |
2,199 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3536 | Iñaki Bilbao | Un Rey en Nueva York | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Irregular and somewhat disjointed, but quite corrosive criticism of intolerance. | A King already quite adult, should move to New York as its Prime Minister has taken all the money. The people believed that he had stolen, but it had been the other.In New York it will be live on pensions, but the hotel is very expensive, so it must earn a living. "And it does thanks to television and radio."Satire political, somewhat excessive and somewhat disjointed but quite corrosive, of what happened to Chaplin in reality, when he had to leave from Los United States "thank you" to the unlucky "hunting for witches" of Hollywood.Chaplin, thanks to the humor, with so many good gags Visual and, above all, verbal, achieves a complaint, perhaps a child at times, but sincere and honest.The "touch" to the last works, although it is true that it is irregular in its development, being much better his first half than the rest.The House UN-American activities Committee members are ridiculed by a sovereign manguerazo, with a running gag of silent film that, despite being fairly predictable, works. And the informing, normal practice in the happy time of the hunting of witches, is exposed for hard but not too convincing, through the child character, with such political, touching and unnerving pitagorín at a time.Controversial film, that equally, practically has been insulted and vindicated. I'll stick with that it is not one of his greatest works, but it is a very interesting film exercise. Oh!, and Dawn Addams, beautiful. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.