Datasets:

Unnamed: 0
int64
0
3.88k
id
stringlengths
44
47
autor
stringclasses
181 values
title
stringlengths
2
71
rank
int64
1
5
maxRank
int64
5
5
source
stringclasses
1 value
summary
stringlengths
9
396
body
stringlengths
352
24.4k
2,300
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/902
Rafa Marin
Casino Royale
2
5
muchocine
After twenty films try to sneak us the dreadful trola not that Daniel Craig is James Bond but that is newbie, brutote, passionate and make mistakes, it is something that does not believe it Judy Dench or the own writers.
Since the George Lazenby said (in English) that of "Oops, this was not happening to the other type", fans of the film adventures of the best known secret agent in the world have developed particular theory that the saga of 007 not is telling us the adventures of a single agent, but many, and that both double acronym zero James Bond brand name as a cover to disguise the identitypast, and even the personality of the new spy that occupies the niche. Yes, I know, there are things that do not fit (pain in the ass that often give Felix Leiter in his different incarnations, for example; the different faces of Moneypenny; the widowhood of the Bond Lazenby inherited Bond Moore), but I would say stuff squeaking less than cocoa mental maravillao facing the top producers, which did not clarify, and now seeking with this new installment, Casino Royale, show us a James Bond. first-time! One is agreed in that, as the cat is yours, can fuck him as they wish, but after twenty films (twenty-three, if you count the television Casino Royale, the original parody Casino Royale, and a return to the fold of Connery with never say never again; do not have the cameo made the character of the hand of the same Connery in the rock) try to sneak us the dreadful trola not of Daniel Craig as James Bond (so)(, cuesta awhile believe it) but that is newbie, brutote, passionate and make mistakes, it is something that does not believe it Judy Dench or the own writers. How much easier would be to accept that there have been other 007 prior to those who have known (us and M) in the past, and now this fortachón rubio seems newly licensed with dishonor of the British SAS has been chosen to finger after Brosnan to fill the post. Talks halfway between M and Craig suggest, the own Judy Dench (Advanced series in interpreting for the first time to a female M and became crazy against Brosnan), said here a line of dialogue that seems to make a nod to the comment to already make the ex-Remington Steele in his first career: "You are a remnant of the cold war", snapped you then, while now, before the brutalities of here blonde blue eyes (above goes for free throughout the movie), says "How much miss the cold war". But no, they have not dared. There is nothing more cagueta that the owner of a franchise. And that there are elements in the movie indicating that the idea could be in the minds of the writers, the director (who reintrepretó the series with Goldeneye now eleven years ago) and the author of the soundtrack: it obscures all the time the subject of Bond, which does not sound until the closing credits; the final scene, the only one in the entire film in which Craig says "My name is Bond, James Bond" is hollow because all the time has named it people, when it would have been easier to be called only 007 so far to assume the personality of the British agent. Moreover, the film tries to escape the Bond scheme always but fails: when approaching the Bond of always (i.e., the action scenes) always remember something that has been made beforehand; damn Mania move the camera makes no look a damn in the fights scenes; and when you try to make a film of posh spies in decadent environments (i.e., the hour long that lasts the card game) it ends up being boring and sleeping. Is not enough to want to innovate: we must know where and why innova, and after twenty titles of franchise strikes me as an unsuccessful effort, an I want to and can't an ask del olmo pears. The bad guys are second category; the plot, silly, predictable and confusing: recognize that Casino Royale, the novel, is little film in its conception (also in comics is a bit pesadita), and is only saved the scene of torture and rescue in extremis. rescue which differs with the book, much more direct, wild and augurador of things to come (a subsection to remember that Bond is marked in the hand as a "Spy" and MI-6 has to remove a piece of skin from the temple to meet the mark detail Fleming undertakes to remember in all their stories). Craig is not a bad actor. But it is not Bond. Or it is not "our" Bond. Cannot be the Bond producers seek to will then be (especially because the story is "now", develops in a world post 11-S). It is not soft. It is too lethal, too sharp, without the sense of humor characteristic of at least four of its predecessors (Connery, Lazenby, Moore and Brosnan; I do not remember whether Dalton made humorous remarks too worried posing). More gross than a Guillemot, to understand us. It is clear that writing the script they had in mind to Brosnan, nor to Ewan McGregor, but with Jason Statham in Transporter (the scene of the fight in the truck recalls to the scene of the truck Transporter which in turn was a "tribute" almost level by level and stunt for stunt to in search of the Lost Ark). For true, what a silly scene at the airport: with which it is falling into the world, do you believe that they will submit a prototype aircraft? at night? Almost equally silly is the persecution giving jaunty manumaná of Middle Africa (a form of recognizing that Bond is now in Spider-Man and the superhero to his worst enemy in the box-office?). And how much this man runs throughout the film. Eva Green is enormously sosa, sosa. A more Bond girl whose history does not interest and does not love: it is incredible that such maromo change from being gross in history to drop the cursiladas released in the past and long minutes of the film. Judy Dench is good in his role of madrecita (enchufadora?) of 007, although it must be hitting a slap to the translation or dubbing: has No logical M tutee bond; that gives you a closeness to the relationship between both unnecessary and contrary to the tension that exists between the two. The deduction of the past of Bond which makes Eva Green, incidentally, contradicts the more or less official biography of the character, so once more we can point to a desire not consummate to tell us that this Bond is actually a new Bond that follows the wake of other Bond no longer. And all this roll tell a newbie Bond for, oh, Boggle because there are organisations of spies that MI-6 does not control (Smersh in the original idea). The same dare and at the end just to do a remake of Doctor No. Or live and let die, that is the next novel. Because without ideas appear to have been all all.
2,301
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2176
Ivan Sainz-Pardo
Zodiac
5
5
muchocine
Once again, Fincher has given another unexpected twist, has released us a new artistic bofeton to perform a true masterpiece and add to his amazing, harrowing and courageous filmography. Film on all four sides.
With Seven, Fincher regained renewed, influenced and pushed a fashion and a new genre of movies and television on serial killers. When already thought that after the unbearable "ceseies" saturation and imitations of that proposal for Fincher master, not needed any encouragement or creative space for anything else, Fincher returns with the surprising Zodiac, that also is based on real events, with what we know about starting the end of the film and the solution to the plot, champion again the most difficult yet.Fincher never loses sight his own style, his vision, or their intentions, the exact dose to take possession of the reason for the Viewer. With an overwhelming talent and amazing accuracy, get freeze us blood with the first appearances of the murderer or grab us to seat in the best style "Hitchcock". However, we soon discovered that the true protagonists are researchers, police and all those involved professionally and personally in a case police, desperate, dense and enigmatic that became hopelessly in a true media show.The story leaves behind and largely to victims or the colorful choreographies of their deaths and focuses on universal feelings like despair, hope, tenacity and obsession. Fincher resigns to seek answers, or motifs, because all of these are unknown. It does not provide absolute light, because the facts even today remain dark. Zodiac has extensive footage, and at the same time, with a mise en scene and a rigorous setting, a serious and appropriate distribution, contained and masterful realization and some isolated flashes will be, without any doubt, in the annals of the history of the cinema. Film on all four sides in almost three hours where we submerged himself in a dark plot, in an alley and hopeless, but that manages to remain in continuous dramatic tension. More it cannot be. Fincher, this time, expelled from class his usual Viewer, the generation of television, the frenzied advertising, video game consoles, the Blockbusters and video clips. That most accustomed to the waterfall of images, zapping, speed, gags, popcorn, mobile lit and the emule.Fincher has done here a meticulous, honest and accurate movie with existing material, as an exemplary film exercise, giving to it of most commercial and frivolous aspects. Once again, Fincher has given another unexpected twist, has released us a new artistic bofeton to perform a true masterpiece and add to his amazing, harrowing and courageous filmography.
2,302
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/136
Marta
V de Vendetta
4
5
muchocine
Despite resentment of the big blockbusters based on comics this movie seems great
The truth is that I begin to be a little tired of this fashion to bring comic books to the big screen. It is not, in itself, have nothing against it, but these "streaks" (disasters, giant and dangerous animals, epic stories, etc) I get a little nervous. Creative problems or bet on insurance? I do not know, but it seems that they will not stop until that have adapted all adaptable. In the end, it doesn't matter. In recent years we have seen, to remember, "Batman", "X-Men" (1, 2 and 3, which is now), "A history of violence", "Fantastic four", "Spiderman", "Sin City", "Ghost World", "Hulk" and much more. Some leave much to be desired and others are quite well. "V for Vendetta" is the last adaptation I've seen and belongs to the second group. In fact, it is one of the films I have liked lately. Those who knew the comic do not seem to be too satisfied with his passage to the film. That, anyway, I am not surprised, because we often make adaptations - comics, books, works of theatre or whatever - disappoint fans of the original product. Film has its limitations and, usually, it is difficult not to leave something behind, not to mention that everyone makes their own idea of how is the story and this does not usually coincide with what it then see on the screen.I had not read the comic, so, first, I cannot comment on it, and second, I care a whit whether or not it is well adapted. I care about the film, and the film seems wonderful. As I said before, is the best I've seen lately, and that I tend to be leery of the big blockbusters based on comics. An interesting story, although, of course, it's not the most original of the world: on "1984" is evident. Fascinating characters, a good performance and a unique aesthetic. The only thing that I have left are those Pat "Matrix" which has at times - these Wachowski were due to forget that they were doing another film-but even abused this kind of efectistas resources. History and image are above the effects, something that for me is essential. I read in some places the film criticism by the subject of terrorism. Since then, it was clear that that would happen, though filmmakers (they are the Wachowski, is James McTeigue, which is not very clear who takes the reins here) have been secured to cover their backs. The debate arises from the movie itself, and the argument "them I have become what I am" is explicit and explosions do not seem to affect to any civilian. On the other hand, is that it sometimes seems that people know not to differentiate between the film and real life, very current though analogies of the film. Well, the criticism is always good, but take a movie as if it were a "Handbook for living" seems a little exaggerated. Not I tell you anything more about the argument because I think that it is a pleasure to watch a movie without knowing exactly what is going. I will only say that go you criticisms to the Government, media, revolutions and charismatic characters you like. There is that.
2,303
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3820
Rafa Delgado
Encantada: La Historia de Giselle
3
5
muchocine
Disney laughs at itself in an elegant way, entertaining and fun, without disheveled, and with great modesty.
Best thing is to laugh at oneself. That thought the Disney when they decided to make Encantada: the history of Giselle. And that they did, because the saying is true, it was needed. What they have done in an elegant way, without disheveled and with much modesty, since it meets all the clichés of fairy tales that has been doing the factory for more than seventy years of history, and mocks them, but without the nasty.Thus, we can find references and parodies in the form of small winks, jokes, gags and even songs (how not) of snow white and the seven dwarfs, Cinderella, the Little Mermaid, sleeping beauty and beauty and the beast (level tracing to the dance of the final level, the best moment in the film). The villain on duty, without going further, is a mix between the Queen of snow white and the best villain of all time Disney, maleficent, from sleeping beauty. Only in appearance, of course, because it is the Coca Cola light mixed with a zero of the evil.In addition to the more or less modestita autoparodia best of the film are actors: Amy Adams is perfect, playing Giselle, a Princess typically Disney, corny, flower-power and defender until the nausea of true love with Prince charming on duty. Nails all tics and movements, falls in love with, and love (je.), the camera and the Viewer, and also sings wonderfully well; something that does not appreciate in the dubbed version, because the songs are interpetadas by Gisela triunfita (forgive the redundancy) that everything must be said, does it not nothing evil (Disney: specialist in which all the songs in his films perfectly den the pego in all countries where Premiere). Also have to James Marsden, who we saw him in Hairspray, and which remains committed to ask shouts a nomination Oscar for the best supporting actor, given that, for a change, it is in its passing it pipe playing typical, topical and cheesy Prince charming.On the other hand are Patrick Dempsey, Timothy Spall and Susan Sarandon, but one is a sosainas of care (Dempsey), the other overload (Spall), and the other has a role as anecdotal that not enough time to appreciate what it does (Sarandon).Another highlight is the typical animation of the factory, which is her missed enough, and it seems that it follows in full form. There are levels that are a true wonder. When viewers will see the final round of Disney to these 2D (but without neglecting the 3D) both us marveled with his sense of musical entertainment during the past decade?All this make Encantada minimally enjoyable product (sometimes boring) and adopted, since the story is typical of the romantic comedies, and is predictable (and incoherent) even say enough, since it is thousand times vista. And no, is not entirely true that to make a film work, he has to work history: REC directly has no history, and works. D
2,304
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4117
Moebius
Grand Hotel
4
5
muchocine
Grand Hotel was without a doubt one of the best works of Irving Thalberg and one of many classics that have arisen from the MGM factory. Essential.
An ex-camarera who had worked in Berlin luxury hotels raided the German literary scene with his Grand Hotel. In 1929 Vicki Baum achieved a great success of sales with a description of the events and characters that can be found in an establishment of such characteristics. On the other side of the Atlantic, a young flacucho and sickly put his eyes in this work even before that it was translated into English.In the young producer Irving Thalberg MGM Studios, infallible creator of both critical and public success, was looking for a new project. Through a synopsis Thalberg gave to what I was looking for, but there was a problem: a small Broadway businessman had done with the rights to the novel. But one businessman looking for investors for his work, and Thalberg took his pportunities: gave $15,000 to do the work, and paid other 20 thousand for the film rights. And incidentally already had an adaptation of the novel that the dessert would have a great success in theatres around the country.After polishing the script producer put hands to work. The first thing was to put a face to the main character of the work, the Ballerina Grusinskaya. Thalberg immediately thought of the most glittering star of his time, Greta Garbo. In the beginning, the Swedish actress turned down the role, because he believed that he was too old for the role with 27 years. But finally the producer convinced her, and "La Divina" would be the dancer coming to less. With the approval of the Garbo, Thalberg made after cameras Edmund Goulding, with a reputation of being a good director of actors.And it was what was needed, since Thalberg had in mind a very strange idea for its time: bring together five of the most important stars of Hollywood in one movie. So strange was that the producer had to convince the Almighty Louis B. Meyer that was a good idea.Grand Hotel would then have five big characters interacting among themselves, each with its own problems and interests. Apart from the aforementioned dancer, have a ruined Aristocrat converted thief, an anxious magnate by finalizing a merger, a poor stenographer to the orders and an empleadillo of the magnate who is left with little time to live and decides to spend their savings to big living his last days.For the role of male Heartthrob, the Baron Von Geigern, Garbo loved John Gilbert, who had already worked in the past, and with whom he had a short romance. But Gilbert had more and more problems with drinking and his career was going downhill, so Thalberg suggested him that he changing his mind. Who did not change was the usual cameraman of the Garbo, William Daniels.Buscando Heartthrob and the sick man, Thalberg thought Buster Keaton for this last character, but Meyer vetoed his proposal. It was in another production of Thalberg, Arsene Lupin, where the producer gave with his gallant: John Barrymore (grandfather of Drew). Barrymore accepted on the condition that his brother Lionel would also participate in the film. Thalberg agreed, but made John sign a contract of three films with MGM. Lionel Barrymore would be terminally ill Kringelein, and John Barrymore (known as "The great profile", if you see the movie know why) the Baron Von Geigern.El cast was completed by Wallace Beery as Preysing businessman. Beery initially turned down the role, but Thalberg convinced him assuring him that it would be the only character to talk with German accent. The challenge appealed to the actor and accepted the offer.For the role of the sensual stenographer Flaemmchen decision could not have been better; Thalberg was signed to another great female star of MGM, the actress of great talent and beauty of Tiger Joan Crawford. To avoid clashes of egos, avoided the characters of Garbo and Crawford coincide in any scene. In addition, set out Crawford shot in the morning while Garbo would do so in the afternoons. A small role would be for Lewis Stone, former silent film Heartthrob.After saving some reticence, Barrymore and Garbo were very good during the filming, to such an extent that Barrymore alongside actress Noll Gurney subsequently organized the funeral of John Gilbert to the satisfaction of the Garbo. Lionel and Beery was going to yours, and Crawford, typical therein, was concerned about highlight somehow. Certain Crawford day feigned illness filming in the afternoon to coincide with Garbo. What could have been a disaster was a brief greeting. Even throughout a Joan Crawford finally intimidated in the presence of "divine", but the Garbo was friendly with her and asked him as he was. A rarity in the psychotic history of the Crawford (famous was his eternal battle with Bette Davies).However, with similar distribution and a good story behind it, nothing could fail and nothing failed. Grand Hotel is a watchmaking machine where everything fits, pace is so perfect as a well greased engine, and the characters entering and leaving in a totally natural way. The Garbo shines once again, with their own light, and deep voice captivates the Viewer, leaving a phrase for the story, I want to be alone. Perfectly complies with John Barrymore, although at first it might seem already too old for the role, being able to be romantic and hard at the same time. His brother Lionel makes us laugh and cry at the same time, while the gross Beery intimidated by their presence. Finally, Joan Crawford, wonderfully sexy, reminds us that it was also a great actress.Grand Hotel was without a doubt one of the best works of Thalberg and one of many classics that have arisen from the MGM factory. Essential.
2,305
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/627
Kiko de España
A scanner darkly
3
5
muchocine
Interesting and, at times, very funny with that couple of junkies Downey Jr. and which jodió you life to the Turkey of Grizzly man.
Turn of the screw to Phillip k. Dick, science fiction and Rotoscoping (it wasn't anything new for him, see Walking life) was the feature of Linklater waited with eagerness for lovers of the genre, because the original story, adapted by the own Linklater, was the perfect excuse to use this animation technique. This section meets far, the viewer feel from the first minute the same paranoia and effects than the characters. He hallucinates. Also, the main characters are interpreted paranoid junkies by? former junkies paranoid? Another section that complies with a promise: everytime Winona, Woody and Robert agree on scene, the film won many integers. Why is so it fails the rest: the plot. I thought, while watching the movie, they had done so, for example, Michael Mann shooting the thriller pure and simple. By using the technical rotoscoped, special effects had not been a significant outlay of money. In fact, none of the actors took their usual salary, the budget the film is eight million euros. It's indie film to percent, forget about action or persecutions, this is a film of people talking. Rather, it is a film people talking much. A pity instead of taking the path of the police investigation and the game of cat and mouse (that lesson of cinema which gives Scorsese in The Departed, by the way) take the coolest of new age philosophy. It is a film that is going to have a very short life if it is projected in inadequate theaters. Refrain palomiteros and other search engines fun evasion: peden staying asleep or leave the room. You aloan warned. Interesting and, at times, very funny with that couple of junkies Downey Jr. and which jodió you life to the Turkey of Grizzly man.
2,306
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1243
Yojimbo
V de Vendetta
2
5
muchocine
Do a worthy and politically opportunistic entertainment but? safe?.
The V is not only the initial of Vendetta. also what is for?Vigorous: the film is made with a great technical invoice. Although the film lasts about two hours and fifteen minutes, is it not long. The action sequences are spectacular, the fights are well made. It is a worthy entertainment, above the standard, with an amazing cast. To begin with, Hugo Weaving in a little grateful for the actor, but interesting role as a composition of a character through self-expression. That if those who have seen the dubbed version have not had occasion to see his work in reality. Also is a pleasure contemplate the beauty and talented Natalie Portman.?Vacuum: a priori, the most controversial element of the film was the script. Ideológico-político speech is an advertising incentive that may predispose to the most reluctant or more "revolutionaries". However the film blends many concepts, represent them with so much Manichaeism and resolved with a fantasy so characteristic of a comic that is as substantial as the popcorn that will be consumed watching this movie. Totalitarianism, fascism, freedom, terrorism, justice, revenge and fear are represented with a depth appropriate to a "botellonera" society, which is why anyone who is not accustomed to arise on a daily basis by those items the movie will seem an encyclopedia full of values. In fact, more incisive and hard criticism that could make the script is the great forgotten, but is given a finish so patronising that nonetheless seem comfortable pamphlet to the Eisenstein, that if, with a musical accompaniment tastefully chosen and extremely emotional and dramatic. Do not forget that great trick of script that benefits the protagonist to unite his revenge with his particular revolution.The main characters, both the terrorist cult, refined, generous, friendly and that does not kill innocent as the girl who learns to lose their fear to end a lever, trigger made a trip on behalf of Justice is actually to settle scores with the past. Its director, with great musical taste and good job on the Mise en scène invites us to that trip. Let us not forget that there are behind the brothers (a brother and a sister) "Guachosqui", that they wanted to start a filosófico-virtual movement and ended up with branches of intragables digital trinkets. Perhaps because of this it the rumor that Alan Moore did not want to know anything about the project as soon as he read the script runs?
2,307
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3293
Juan Fondevila
Las vírgenes suicidas
4
5
muchocine
Unfortunately sometimes hides under beautiful faces, blonde Manes to wind and eyes of blue infinity. The misfortune is sometimes found in large houses of extensive gardens, where the leaves of autumn sheet hides the lawn. The misfortune is sometimes a shining Apple with a worm lurking inside.
Live between the intense aroma of the talent does not guarantee that art shoot your hands, eyes and mouth. The fragrance of the art is whimsical, dance through the air, sits in a few people, not passed from parents to children. But there are times that a surprise that intense perfume, which transforms the mind of him who plays, draws a small tour and just meters further, as a legacy, sets its destination. Sofia Coppola was impregnated and the Virgin suicides was his first demonstration of his intense and fragrant perfume of talent. Perhaps his first hit was take to film the great novel by Jeffrey Eugenides and transported to the screen the melancholy of the sunset that inhabit its pages. Unfortunately sometimes hides under beautiful faces, blonde Manes to wind and eyes of blue infinity. The misfortune is sometimes found in large houses of extensive gardens, where the leaves of autumn sheet hides the lawn. The misfortune is sometimes a shining Apple with a worm lurking inside.While watching the movie I wanted and not wanted to be neighbor of the Lisbon. I wanted that Lux (Kirsten Dunst) I would hammer the heart to nailing her eyes on me showing me hatred and eternal love. I wanted to be invited to the only and last party that took place in the Lisbon House and dance spinning to a sister, her golden mane, her white dress. I wanted to approach me with trembling step and knock on the door of the Office of the father (James Woods) and make an appointment with his daughter as if you request a piece of heaven. And challenge the powerful gaze of the mother (Kathleen Turner) with boldness that only has a crush on fifteen years. And, at the same time, I wanted to escape the charm of those five girls, forget them, send them away. Because I knew that it was in danger of as those neighbouring the Lisbon boys awaken me years later with a dry throat, heart throbbing and the mind full of those now unattainable infinite blue eyes. There are beautiful olmos dead inside.
2,308
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3296
Andrés Pons
Wrong Turn 2
3
5
muchocine
An entertainment for a good afternoon where can not ask you more.
Between 2003 and 2004 horror film suffered a regression which many were grateful, half dumb teenagers gave step dirt of yesteryear. The Remakes of the Texas and ZOMBIE massacre in the great dawn of the dead made us presage an authentic revolution in the genre.Including a film premiered WRONG TURN small I enjoy remarkable success to recover formulas old but never past fashion clearly inspired by the hills have eyes or the Texas Chainsaw Massacre. A film that was not news nor was expected but if that was a nice entertainment of blood with good dose of old-school action.We get a second part drinking from the same sources little or has nothing to do with the original. Only in the name in what seems like a clear business strategy, a new story begins with entirely new characters. Rookie JOE Lynch does not walk with end, small beer when it comes to offer a genuine festival GORE accompanied by magnificent special effects, a plot reminiscent of MY little EYE mixed with the typical stories of deep America. Young actors among which highlights "the massacre of Texas 2004" Erica Leerhsen and TEXAS BATLE seen in the series final destination.Them along with other fellow interpret the characters in this type of product. The Fox, the cock, the cool are good meat to the cannibals of shift, a good dish of rapid consumption raw material where a hooliganism at all times with good technical aspects in its wide range of torture. An entertainment for a good afternoon where can not ask you more.
2,309
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/49
Verolindapechocha
Munich
2
5
muchocine
Between confused and smothered by so much violence
Munich I liked very little throughout the film I spent her wanting to be at home watching American Idol auditions, imagine my boredom. I am fan of Steven Spielberg and I liked it until the war of the worlds (which many not forgave him), but it left me confused and smothered by so much violence where already not understood who he was Israeli, who Palestinian, where were the protagonists and end, a Grits of characters and stories.OK, the film was intended to be a complaint that barbarism only generates more barbaric and more barbaric and more to the infinitum. That, in the midst of so much confusion, comes to achieve. In this case the story from the murder of eleven israelíes-judíos athletes at the Munich Olympics in 1972, in charge of eleven árabes-palestinos, belonging to the Black September organization, intended to "mark a position" policy. The truth is that I myself do not know since when started this rivalry between ethnic different (?), but if I know that it has when finish. And in short, that was the main message of the film, which could well have saved a few deaths and minutes.The film raises various moral dilemmas for Israeli protagonist, Avner (Eric Bana, the Incredible Hulk, 2003): is due to his family or to their homeland? hero or killer? Justice or revenge? And the options that takes condemn it forever, because memories of so much violence will forever live in it despite the fact that at the beginning of the film, it was basically an average man: kind, devoted to his family and with a "boring" profession. Strangely chosen it to lead a secret anti-terrorist group, composed of a series of characters so inexperienced in the "art" of killing like him. Finally, who are the real terrorists?This servant he disliked Munich, however, could my tastes be very wrong, because the Academy has awarded five nominations: best PelículaMejor direction - Steven SpielbergMejor adapted screenplay - Tony Cushner and Eric RothMejor EdiciónMejor MúsicaLa performance by Eric Bana is in my opinion the only thing (or more) salvageable of the film and it has not been considered in the selection.I think that my review career en route to the Oscar isn't very promising. Usually the Academy and I tend to be quite agree, but this year it seems so far. We will continue to see.
2,310
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/533
Beatriz Perez
Click
1
5
muchocine
A very bad movie that can cause ulcer how horrible that is. Also play with the Viewer as if this moron, from comedy to drama so inexplicable.
Mmmmmmm. click! eeeeeee. buff, yuck, argh, buff, clik! Ouch!. buff, andaaaaaa!, re-buff. I believe that it is the consistent thing I can say about 'Click', the last monstrosity starring the hint of actor that called Adam Sandler, that Yes, has many followers throughout the wide world. These precisely I would say to continue not reading the sentences that follows, the rest of the post are going. I don't want to hurt deep sensitivities, although at the end and all, to Sandler fans gives equal what I or anyone else with a head on your shoulders, can say against famous comedian (jajajajajajajaja, pussy, because it is true, makes people laugh). And given how like what stated against Sandler because you can read everything that comes next. But then do not want problems or questions of the type "Hey, and what you meant when you say that it is a plagiarism?".The argument of the thing it is very simple: we have happily married father of family but you don't have time for your family because it is clear, waiting for an important ascent in the company you are working (architect). Therefore it is not happily married. One day being desperate is helped, how magically, by a hidden clerk in a department store, which gives her a universal remote that can organize absolutely everything in his personal universe. You can download the volume to all those with which pointing with the remote control, you can make everything go slow, and you can also skip chapters of his life and go to what really interests you. Before you learn the lesson of his life it fun as nice with the mandito of the noses.Sandler must have some problem with the Frank Capra film, because it has already resorted to him on more than one occasion, putting a day (so to speak) one or another classic of the great director. But of course, there is a huge chasm between the two. Sandler did not understand the Capra film and it is likely that you have never seen, and no mistake, Sandler is not James Stewart or Gary Cooper, real heroes solitary in a type of film that today day as much as you want, and except for very rare occasions, it is not known to do. 'Click' isn't that you plan the shadow of 'what Bello is live!', it is virtually the same story, adorned with the nonsense of the command and some plot details. The nerve with which the authors of this monstrosity have plagiarized the mythical title that all Christmas us broadcast by television is duty court. Attentive to the final part of the film (well, if you see), of an embarrassing that pulls back and clearly invites get the room throwing pests. Capra is stirring in the Tomb, I have not the slightest doubt.And you me you can ask surprised, or not, but what you expect, what was good? and I can answer you that no, did not expect me, but it kept some hope with the detail of the mandito, original detail, it must be said, but badly exploited and developed. Once dissipated the doubt that the original idea will be ruined soon begin the screening, could not expect me nothing good of a film directed by Frank Coraci, who had already directed to Sandler twice, and the last, 'The Waterseller', was a very forgettable title.Script runs absolutely all topics of this type of production, and of course does it without any grace or claw. The characters are all photocopies of photocopies of the clones of the imitation of other so many characters in family ñoña film where crush us again and again that the family is the greatest thing, something that obviously is very well teach to others, but the film does not have the slightest consistency to everything stuck to shoehorn and there is what is called dramatic progressionlook at you where is what there was in the titles of Capra, which proclaimed the same moral values. But of course, things have changed a lot. Now to spread a good message the protagonist has to throw a few huge farts in the face of his boss, watch how dog fucks always the same plush (by the way, a totally accurate custom), etc, etc. The humor of these comedies kind, so call them, is poorer and less intelligent, clearer and less worked, more eschatological and less subtle. True to the film: shit, man.In its cast are the only thing salvageable from the film. No, I do not mean to Adam Sandler which continues with the same face of always playing the same role that leads his life playing and does not change or the least. Until it is likely the phrase of her character may be perfectly interchangeable in his films (okay, not named "Punch Drunk Love", hence the thing is different, but to me I look like a failed film). Kate Beckinsale walks around here as I I walk every day of my house to work and happened it to me better. What this actress has no name, but its presence is completely dispensable in this film, because her could have played it any. Moreover, there are actresses of the age of Beckinsale with many more resources than this very limited actress.Fortunately, we don Christopher Walken going big in the extent of what can, giving us his peculiar sense of humor with a character that is could have removed much more party, but clear, to Sandler should not overshadow him. Although this almost succeeds David Hasselhoff, Yes, Yes, see it to believe it. The legendary Michael Knight is splendid as the head of the main character, laughing at him/herself at all times, although in the end they forget altogether from it. The appearances of the two actors, especially the second, are the best of the film. Of course, this fails.A very bad movie that can cause ulcer how horrible that is. Also play with the Viewer as if this moron, from comedy to drama in inexplicable and totally incoherent way so many pull the cleenex and excited with a history full of nonsense. Buff.
2,311
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1119
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Mujeres en el parque
4
5
muchocine
Clean, sincere over not being able to film. Vega film going to horse between the everyday and how wonderful and their characters are not given your personal halo: let them fly free; He shoots them with enormous asepsis, leaving them succeed and be wrong.
All emotions are predictable. All hopes. And fears. The contradictions encourage an inaccurate, imperfect world, accomplice of all barbaric and all the prodigies who have executed in its fragile resistance to the giro, but the world keeps turning and the rhetoric of the giro (of complicity in good and bad, of this abstract concept of Pantheism inclusive) is useful to give some light to this simple exercise in film very semanticforged around the morality of necessarily unstable characters, stranded in the communication, made to say and listen to, but do not say or not listen: maybe a sign of these times.Felipe Vega and screenwriter Manuel Hidalgo offer a clean, sincere over not being able to film, a universe of couples who never fall into conflict beaten by the plentiful supply of that film of personal relationships, couples to the Woody Allen, who delivered and are rejected, that they burrow until you find the key that redeems them from its existential boredom. Vega film (remember the wonderful summer clouds) going to horse between the everyday and how wonderful and their characters are not given your personal halo: let them fly free; He shoots them with enormous asepsis, leaving them succeed and be wrong. The small raised generational drama does not give a solution to the problems: it exposes without frivolity, it brings closer them to the sensitivity of who, stunned, notes how everything is articulated under the cold layer of solitary confinement, which sometimes comes dressed as arrogance or hypocrisy or weakness.Actress Blanca Apilánez is immense. Too bad the end, something ridiculous, away the last of the pure excellence impression. Nor collaborates certain formal eviction in scenes that we understand key (the scene of the bar with customers that have just been going).
2,312
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2313
Bruji
Lo que no se ve
2
5
muchocine
The producers of "The sixth sense" are responsible for demonstrating the irreversible coma of the screenplays, the death of the originality and the resurrection of plagiarism.
The producers of "The sixth sense" and director of "Blade Trinity" (dangerous collaboration) carried out this thriller, remake of a Swedish film. An irregular and, at times, entertaining history student with far-reaching claims that, in their multiple twists, is responsible for demonstrating the irreversible coma of the screenplays, the death of the originality and the resurrection of plagiarism.As "the essential remains invisible to the human eye", has to admit the possibility of finding before a cult film, one of those movies that will serve as a reference in the future. But for now, everything points toward another "what television as one starring Harrison Ford, that only left us a memorable and recurring scare in the bathtub in what the truth hidden in the year 2000". from the stories to not sleep of fourth Millenium (this great program), the writers have made multitude of incursions in different genres, the horror drama comedy, through to reach this "supernatural thriller that gradually becomes a romantic story of redemption", in the words of the director. Too much flourish to define a fantasmada, in the best sense of the word, according to the mine.History rocks between the teen horror of fear blue (1985) and the theatrical Ghost (1990) for lead in an unexpected twist, original surprise, finding atractivo.si would have not known it in a romantic comedy, Ojalá Fuera Cierto, 2005. The steps you follow to both, we discovered that this, The Invisible, is the remake of a Swedish film Den Osynlige, year 2002, based on a novel by the author Mats Wahl, also Swedish. Do for its part, the excellent comedy by Mark Waters, that had in its cast Mark Ruffalo and adorable Reese Witherspoon, comes from the literary adaptation Et if c? était vrai. the French writer Marc Levy. Strange coincidence!. Only here not ending the match. One of the directors of Den Osynlige, Joel Bergvall, prepares his Hollywood debut with Addicted, remake of a Korean film. of identical theme!.At this point, the viewer begins to marvel of originality that governs the world, there must be another collateral damage of the effect of globalization, and "that" is written in Singapore already thought in burrows, but is he published in Philadelphia. It would not be strange to the 2,060 year someone comment a film premiere alluding to "what is not, as that classic of the year 2007". Another of these curiosities that govern the history of cinema.For the moment, only perceives a plagiarized story with a narrative structure of infuriating linearity with the ups and downs of the worst TV movies, with redundant phrases which derived into sub-plots that remain in the air, and with a modern soundtrack, which would be only missing a seductive voice that reminded some "Things to do in Denver when you're dead" to become the pilot of one of those new breed TV series episode. A film which based its main attraction on the supernatural phenomena that run without resorting to special effects (Ojalá Fuera Cierto again), with some far-reaching claims that other many directors, writers and producers reflected with greater intensity and lower camelo. To sounds them what that "Only shows the life when you experience the absence"?, perhaps to what beautiful is live Frank Capra?. Ultimately, all are surprisingly different and terribly similar, only you have to break the facade that makes the image of others comes to us distorted, because, almost always, beauty is in the heart. Not remember them this beauty and the beast of Jean Cocteau?. Once again, nothing new under the Sun. Just a regrettable screenplay of Davis, entertaining in their development when obviate their ridiculous frequent failures. However, we remained with the great work of the later Marcia Gay Harden, with the deadpan boy in the war of the worlds (that kind of actor who, inexplicably, kink producers) and, above all, with a draft of Angelina Jolie, with less lips and more talent. Attention to the gymnast Margarita Levieva, if it is not it eventually for dramas, may always be used in the third installment of Lara Croft.
2,313
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1345
Caruco
Dreamgirls
4
5
muchocine
A music pure and hard, done with delicacy and passion, and to savour with the same requirements.
Along with the western in its purest form, the other film genre that does not enjoy at all in the favor of the public present, above all non-American, is the musical. If you are not a lover of the musical the likelihood that likes "Dreamgirls" are reduced to the infimum.And incidentally has all the possibilities of losing one of the best adaptations of a Broadway musical film, in this case, inspired by the trajectory of the Supremes. It also presents another hurdle, the downturn of notable interest from almost start the footage to the 20 minute scattering in terms of characters and situations. But, by magic, and against all odds, manages to climb dramatically before screening time.And this thanks to the talent of a choreography, sets, costumes and poses so studied, colorful and imaginative as sunsets at the service of the story. And also, without which "Dreamgirls" would not be anything, thanks to the talent in the Mise en scène of Bill Condon and interpretations, particularly Jennifer Hudson, new from American star idol, the O.T. to the American, and he starred in a number of separation with the rest of the group, which leaves alone exhibiting their arts.Elegance and passion.What is staging the passion for music, even disregarding, or passing on tiptoe with mild strokes, with what was the tumultuous historical context of the times: Martin Luther King, race riots, Viet Nam, protests youth? Anything!, the plot and the characters go to theirs.Possessive and inhuman, relentless music producers embodied in Curtis Taylor (Jamie Foxx), that make us see the coldness and lack of scruples towards people, not towards the money of the savvy of the record scene.Or the contrast between true talent, incarnated by Effie (Jennifer Hudson), overshadowed before the beautiful image that can sell of Deena Jones (off Beyoncé Knowles).If even Eddie Murphie is sober and restrained in his interpretation (why not deserves an Academy Award), putting all the meat, and voice, on the grill. To highlight the look of determination and helplessness, when it comes to injecting coca before their friends, that summarizes everything what is fragile in its character. (Attention: spoiler!) Later, left in the hands of his musical patron, Curtis Taylor, focus you a fade in black which is a drop of the withering curtain premonition. (End of the spoiler)The worst a deslabazado Assembly that jump, or dance, a character and fact to another, which makes passing the years without us we inmutemos. But a musical pure and hard (the sequence of the "theft" of the song is anthology), done with delicacy and passion, and to savour with the same requirements. Douglas Sirk would be proud.
2,314
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3859
Ivan Villamel
3:10 to Yuma
4
5
muchocine
Great film, a western upstream in the current film, who knows how to find the right point of balance between action and the characters inner development.
Many have been attempts in the past years of revival of the western, and all in vain, having still been carried out samples of proven reliability and high quality generic. Films such as the excellent (and overlooked at the time) "Open Range", or the estimable "forgiveness", put in scene a few great thoughts on the iconic sense of the genre more alien to any external influence in the form of literature or even historical, most of them shot in the genre films a compedio of an era of American society truly limited in time (a period of 10-12 years at least)being all allusion to outside this period times pure fantasy created with the aim of over-stating an anarchic and absent any moral enforcement way of life. Is for this reason that a revision of that remarkable Delmer Daves western (great movie, but nothing perfect) is a priori, wanted a more commercial decision (by way of the vast list of remakes made in American territory in recent years) than artistic, searching according to the most optimistic of the remakes, a revisitación of history for future generations in this (sic). Notable surprise meant for a server (although to be honest, if deposited hopes in this film) meet a great psychological western with a wonderful moral and deep description of characters.The plot of the film, as well as the classic version, us is situated in the skin of two antagonistic characters, on the one hand the farmer Dan Evans (Christian Bale), and on the other the outlaw Ben Wade (Russell Crowe). When the latter is captured by the forces of the law, Dan offers to accompany them to the nearest town, where will rise to Wade to a train bound for the Yuma jail, with the only goal by the humble farmer paid two hundred dollar reward and revive his indebted family farm, in the hope of a future better. During the journey, the band of outlaws who headed Wade, will follow the track to liberlo, in a race against time before the upload to their charismatic leader to jail wagon.Behind the scenes, and trying to bring to fruition so suggestive project, is the New York James Mangold, a director who presents a career full of effective work, but devoid of personality, let alone a correct craftsman in terms of the current film (remember those considered artisans makes dozens of years, they are now considered essential directors). In his journey as a filmmaker, has offered works of proven solvency, as his opera prima "heavy", interesting police thriller "CopLand" or products at the service of as "Girl, interrupted" Star Angelina Jolie or "on a tightrope" (both films with its corresponding Oscar for very limited actresses such as Reese Witherspoon and the aforementioned Angelina Jolie).The great scourge has dragged this director since its inception, manifests itself in his detractors by attacks on his little personality as a filmmaker, unable to create a staging or a personal point of view of the stories told, and this aspect has given a radical turnaround in his latest work for the film. "3: 10 To Yuma", Mangold knows to give the whole a consistent packaging and a look close to those characters so disparate that presents the story, dominating an effective and direct staging, naturalist on many occasions and a crushing sincerity in their intentions. In this case, craftsman Yes, but brilliant without doubt.You can imagine one a cast of actors more appropriate for the history after watch this great movie, while the vast majority of them to an exceptional level. Especially noteworthy performances by four of the characters in the film, the two actors main and side two of luxury. Bale and Crowe one hand embroider two roles of characters confronted in appearance, but not so disparate in the background without any effort. His two characterizations reached such level of brilliance, that when they meet face to face on screen, they follow a level of rapport and empathy acting absolutely overflowing, resulting, undoubtedly the best of the film by far. On the other hand, two secondary actors stand out above the rest, sticking out his head and screaming a higher level of prominence in future coming productions is Logan Lerman in the role of William Evans and Ben Foster in the role of the charismatic Charlie Prince, faithful companion of misdeeds of Ben Wade.Esta great acting demonstration can Excel due to a script extremely effectiveequipped with an impeccable dramatic progression, which does more than show us efectistas shootings or free scenes as in the majority of modern westerns (whose names do not want or name), being subtle and cleverly distributed throughout the footage scenes of action, in an impeccable way, at the moment. This creates a narrative that runs a balance beyond doubt, a perfect narrative duality between the physical action and inner of the characters without doing anything heavy, and through our retinas like lightning. Impeccable narrative and formal balance.In addition, the subtle metaphor involving have given greater importance to the journey undertaken by the law officers to carry his prisoner to the train to Yuma, in contrast to the version of Delmer Daves, more interested perhaps in the final showdown which in the evolutionary process that leads to that outcome have not can ignore. During this brilliant journey, we are witnessing the development of several trips, all of them parallel and indissoluble about others. On the one hand becomes special stress upon this physical distance between the two towns, but it comes accompanied by another voyage, the intern that shows Mangold with special brightness between the two main protagonists, becoming finally less than soul mates in the background, despite not to share objectives or principles, personalities counter at first, but finally equidistant. Shown above in a subtle way through brilliant dialogues, glances of complicity and acts that they honor or portray both characters.Not only shows that interesting aspect between the two main characters, but that the relationship between his son, Wade and his faithful outlaw, or Evans is developed growing form and increasingly more empathetic in a case, or distant on the other. Blurring sometimes the line that separates the good from the bad, the duty of honour or morality of pragmatism, in short, as shown by the great stories human.The negative aspects are scarce in the film, being perhaps slightly forced certain attitudes of the characters in the film, especially in the leg end of the story, resulting in empathic too much taking into account the situation in which are found in certain moments in history. And also it is obvious some tics debtor of a current film too obsessed by the blows of effect through attitudes too tied to an arrogant and overloaded modernism.In short, a great film, a western upstream in the current film, who knows how to find the point just balance between action and the characters inner development, shown with a brilliant solvency. With a few players in State of grace, some great action scenes (not yet overcome the brilliant final scene of the wonderful "Open Range"), and a message buried perhaps more debtor of the current time as in versioning film, but that by no means is less convincing. Notable film, to which only the mild Remora previously discussed prevent become a new classic (at the risk of apparently risky).
2,315
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2938
Oscar Cantero
El Elegido
2
5
muchocine
A missed opportunity to create an interesting product idea that is you could get much more party.
The chosen is one of those horror films modern, which has now been called psychological horror (as if there is another). Starring one deliberately afeada (although neither wanting to get) Monica Bellucci, tells the story of a single and lonely woman who adopts a baby from a Siberian orphanage. When it has eight years, appears in his torso a brand, which is associated with a legend of a tribe of his native territory, and since that time, they start to happen the murders, disappearances and strange.With a fairly successful atmosphere, favoured by the aura of mystery that alone it covers the Russia mother, is a production that is would have been able to get much more juice of the retrieved and have formed a film much more round and finished that represents the chosen. Starting with an interesting and intriguing idea, the truth is that the tone is falling to become boring at times, leaving a sense of dissatisfaction and missed opportunity.The alternation between the Parisian stage and the Russians will not just transmit the feeling of uncertainty that should, encourages the Viewer to the why of things is posing in a continuous manner, nor is the motivation that moves the characters that are parading across the screen unfinished contribute anything really worthy of a call. When in a film of intrigue, one does not feel the need to think and guess about the answers to the questions raised, we have been astray.For this reason even the presence of the immortal Catherine Deneuve manages to give the film the consistency needed to convert a good proposal in a tangible reality and easy enjoyment by a spectator that no doubt will be disappointed to disappointed expectations, as little more than nudity, fleeting and unexpected of the Bellucci will be for the annals of the seventh art.
2,316
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3767
Jokin García
Soy leyenda
2
5
muchocine
The Omega Man is faced with a horde of infected and the reality of being a bad remake.
Imagine that an Apocalypse decimated humanity and you are the only human being left on the face of the Earth. Now imagine that you're not alone at all, you're only human, Yes, but that you get to share space with a race of mutant vampires, and that day you head-on at your leisure, but at night you have to ocutlarte of them, that does not give you hunting.This is the premise of the novel "I am Legend", carried to the film previously on 2 occasions, being possibly the most famous "Omega Man", starring Charlton Heston, titled as "The Omega Man".One could say that this film is a remake of one, although it could also be said that it is a remake of "Harry Potter", "Snakes on a plane" or a documentary about the alignment of Manchester United in 1998, since all you have in common is that a certain get Neville.Un Neville, also suffered from kingpinismo, something that quite meets the personality of the protagonist of the novel, but in the end. If that were the worst.In this film the vampires are substituted by infected (that not zombies) enrabietados and through, very different from the afro-setentera sect of the Charlton Heston film roll, involved attacking wild form and mandada, with assault on the included Neville mansión-arsenal. Look, yes it shows this is a remake of a movie of Heston, insofar as it is to have weapons up below the carpet.But while there are a many things that grind, the film manages to be entertaining, until that hour and film media, the writers decide, in a completely anticlimática way to end the film in a final of the of "I want the money back", and an explanation of why the film is called "I am Legend" stuck with shoehornpetroleum jelly and many shoving.Ultimately, that they have caught a license, is they have smoked, her have changed from ariba to below and with the excuse they made a bad movie (sorry of infected) zombies and are loaded the fundamental premise of "I am Legend" is not the "I am a black man that shoots the zombies" but of "I'm a monster and they fear those that I fear"", since for them, I am legend."
2,317
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4225
Victor Bilbao
El hombre silencioso
3
5
muchocine
Film in the West of the silent medium footage (over one hour), shot by William S. Hart, a pioneer in the film westward and real hero of the far west with honesty in the manner of those times.
"An honored miner reaches a people willing to register the good gold mine that has been found." However a huge and his young wife to cheat and steal all the gold and the paper comes where everything related to the mine. When he regains the sense is nothing. "But he retaliate little by little."Film in the West of the silent medium footage (over one hour), shot by William S. Hart, a pioneer in the film westward and real hero of the far west with honesty in the manner of those times.The main character is a good man who is forced to take action when sees that nothing is alien greed (years later this type of character resume it successfully James Stewart).This film is nothing out of this world but not bored and there are good scenes of action.Worth for several reasons, as entertainment, as a historical film in some ways, not in vain is see how actually were the people of the far west, being so much more is carried realistic than classic westerns that cemented the King genus, see William S. Hart, which paved the way for future filmmakers, both ahead and behind the screen.In this film they accompany Hart, Vola Vale, Robert McKim, and/or George Nichols.
2,318
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3939
Ramón Balcells
Lejos de ella
5
5
muchocine
Rarely there is a debut film with so much life and as an adult as far from Ella, Sarah Polley. This is without doubt, the most beautiful and sincere film that has seen in years.
Rarely there is a debut film with so much life and as an adult as far from Ella, Sarah Polley. This is, without doubt, the most beautiful and sincere film that has seen in years, and taking into account that this is a beginner in this address, one is merely being admire her already for that magnificent story that told us with truly beautiful, sad images to over not being able to. And is that it covers not only the subject of the Alzheimer in a madurísima way, also get trapped in a small place full of feelings, pains, passions and, above all, eternal love. Under a striking, polished and very convincing script, Polley portrays us the life of two couples who distance themselves from the disease. One is formed by Gordon Pinset and Julie Christie, two monsters of the interpretation that give us classes with absolute mastery. Two performances that reach pure realism, magical, incredibly transformed. The second marriage is composed of Olympia Dukakis (awesome) and Michael Murphy (who barely spoke), other two people separated by the pain that they either engage in friendship, jealousy and romance with another couple. These four human flesh and bone are the Centre far from it, which also has a direction and screenplay has little to envy of Coixet, Bergman or any other inspiration that Polley has taken into account, that not a role model. A final poignant and unforgettable shows us that we have witnessed the largest and least tear film event of the past year. And it is that it does become respond the proposal of the Canadian Director, marked by a slow pace and it turns out to be a true retrospective of the human being, of loss and the eternal love. Sarah Polley not confuses terms, know what you do; is, in this sense, a wise girl and really take into account over the next few years. This is a sensational, delicate, adult movie for anyone who knows to appreciate life as something not too simple, so you have to fight. And I cannot forget me repeat the absolutely perfect, masterful interpretation of the gorgeous Julie Christie.
2,319
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3506
Iñaki Bilbao
La Caja Kovak
3
5
muchocine
Estimable tape of intrigue, with a good climax.
Interesting co-production between Spain and Great Britain, very competent from the industrial point of view. That is, a frenetic montage, a superb soundtrack of Roque Baños, beautiful photography, and an estimable address by Daniel Monzón, which gives a quick pace to the captivating story.But is that its development is, in General, uneven. Its first third is very good, we will know the main characters, and the abnormal events, strange suicides, confront us with power and dramatic intensity. This part is very good and hooked to the most demanding Viewer.However, later events is slow enough, although the interest is not low, because the climax of mystery and intrigue argues intelligently. There are also some scenes, such as the taxi, excellent and very difficult to shoot, that startle.The best is in its final third, with everything that happens in "Caves of hell". Here the pace becomes to shoot, with moments adrenalíticos and a really notable formal reslución.Perhaps what most rechine is know to what relates all which is leif-motif of this great little monster superbly played by the almost octogenarian David Kelly, a very veteran actor who has perhaps managed the interpretation of his life here. When this leif-motiv is known, I think that you know a little, that is exaggerated as causes for achieving its goal. Anyway, is just my opinion clear.In short, "The Kovak box" is a very interesting film, which is very well shot and has genuine interest. A film genre that is really worthwhile despite its imperfections.
2,320
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/711
Radon
Ant bully
4
5
muchocine
I never aplastaré an Ant. Do if arriving home we give them these candies that when it masticas them crumble?
Perhaps it has something more field than "other film critics", but at any moment in the film I doubted that the sinister bugs on which our little protagonist flies are wasps. The first indication about its nature is that they are quite nasty, the second is that they are equipped with Sting, and the third and most unavoidable is that feed on other insects.Surprisingly, today I went to see the movie, this morning. To my small you really wanted see her for some time and is almost retired from the poster, so we have gone to see it in IMAX, as high as a 7-storey building on-screen and in 3 dimensions. Criticism of the small of the House is as follows: "never again aplastaré an Ant." Do if arriving home we give them these candies that when it masticas them crumble? "." objective fulfilled, has not moved from his seat in the 8 minutes long. He said that he loved and that when we return.As for the argument, for nothing has seemed to me repetitive or similar to "Antz" or "Affection have shrunk to children", unlike other children, it has got me thrill without resorting to the Elimination of the parental figures. With regard to the child, not thought me that was "fun killing ants from your garden", rather used them as a way of expressing anger that was not able to desccargar against the bully in the neighborhood that turned out to be too big.Perhaps the fault has been the 3 dimensions, or maybe not, but agree with my son and give an excellent film. Even a child of 4 years is able to perceive some of the messages of higher moral of the movie load, such as that of the evil that is attacking a few ants just for fun.
2,321
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/358
Rafa Ferrer
La joven del agua
3
5
muchocine
A tape that will please fans of the Indian director, the rest... will seem more of the same.
This is not a typical Shyamalan film, and is, I have to begin by the end, there is no surprise idem, the kind that leave us the mouth open and regretting not giving us has aterioridad; the director of Indian origin made up a real image fairy tale (almost as did Tim Burton with his "Big Fish"), I remember where I read it, the film tribute to the great classics of the 80s, these tapes where people normal were not faced with bizarre situations that a priori exceeded, as well "The girl in the water" is the kinda very good tight wool, which will desmadejando as Hank spend their 90 min. of footage.Paul Giamiatti as Bryce Dallas Howard, are excellent in their roles, Paul knows to interpret altenando the drama with comedy, Bryce falls in love with the House as "Narf" aquatic, while M.Night Shyamalan reserves a "starring" role and not the typical cameo to which we are accustomed, where he tries to get even with the few minutes that appeared on their previous tapes, ultimately everything is round, perhaps the only note discordant is the of lack of final surprise, is that you one when he sees a tape "Made in Shyamalan" is what you expected.In short, a tape that will please fans of the Indian director, to the rest. It seems more of the same.
2,322
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3730
Ana Belén Pacheco
The Ten
2
5
muchocine
The main problem of the tape is that all fragmented films. Equal to some stories are simply great others click and a little bored.
The Ten is a modern revision of the ten commandments. Beautiful movie for ssutituir to the Charlon Heston afternoons of Easter (take note-producing television that the idea her cedo for free).Paul Rudd, the man who lives in nowhere with your tables presents ten stories to illustrate each commandment adventurous to star in one himself.The main problem of the tape is that all fragmented films. Equal to some stories are simply great others click and a little bored. Reminded me the excitement it caused in my New York stories (bridge the gap, a is a teacher and another a trivial entertainment) bright episodes of the boy that falls from the sky, or nudists but not so much for the sake of your neighbor, Christ or the doctor who quips. That Yes, the actors very correct, the creme de la creme: Paul Rudd, Jessica Alba, Winona Ryder, Adam Brody, Gretchen Mol, Famke Janssen, Rob Corddry, Liev Schreiber, Oliver Platt, Justin Theroux, Ken Marino. All of them jump of a story to another sharing small side with actors.A partial and moderate fun.
2,323
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2310
Bruji
La reina de Nueva York
4
5
muchocine
Do a film that, despite carrying to extremes the appellant? battle of sexes? and contain the most memorable discussion of the history of the cinema, never have the consideration of other comedies of the era.
"New York, the city in which up to the truth, to the contact with the ground, becomes more false than a glass eye".Some critics of the 1930s popularized the belief that Hollywood had become a vulgar brunette the most sophisticated blonde. Referred to Carole Lombard, whose elegance was obvious, and which the fame of "vulgar" came you, logically, not by the color of their hair, and yes the language used to joke with his co-stars.The undisputed Queen of comedy, protagonist of mythical titles as being or not being, or the service of ladies, (to be nominated), made this great sense of humor that characterized it for screen sharing with an actor who despised, Fredric March, in Nothing Sacred.El script for this movie, - based on a play that had been published in an important journal of the time-It was written entirely in a train and was intended, precisely, to be interpreted by the actress. The plot, full of social satire, already in 1937 spoke of characters who sell stories invented to the press to be famous, media not contrasting the information received because their only concern is the print headlines strange vibration morbid this kind of gossip and tabloid, cause in the population.With this basic component, the Wild Bill (William Wellman), designed a product in line with known comedies "screwballs", in which not missed a sour criticism of Vermont residents or insinuating sensual undertones. A film which, despite carrying to extremes the recurring "battle of sexes" and contain the most memorable discussion of the history of the cinema, never reached the consideration of other comedies of the Decade as A great news story or the Fiera of my girl the distribution – which contained one of the best performances of the spectacular blondewhich managed to Eclipse, even a star called March, inside and outside the screen-featured attractive appearances, as in the German comedian Sig Rumann (for whom David o. Selznick felt weakness), the wizard of Oz wicked witch and the "Mommy" of what the wind is brought; work that both would come them two years later.At a technical level, their main strengths reside in the use of innovative photography in color in the original music of Oscar Levant that emulated the great Broadway musical, in outlandish costumes designed by Walter Plunkett for their heroines, and the personal touch that brought the tape Cameron Manzies as second unit director.History failed in 1953 in theatre, and was brought back to cinema in 1954 in a curious version, under the title of living his life, starred by Jerry Lewis.La Queen of New York, Carole Lombard, lost his life in a terrible plane crash at 1.942. He was only 33 years old. Left a famous widower, Clark Gable, a total of 75 films was (unable to attend the premiere of the latter), and one of the greatest talents the seventh art has ever known.
2,324
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2071
Rafa Ferrer
Thirteen
3
5
muchocine
One of these large tapes that certainly we should not miss.
Winning the prize for Best Director at the last festival Sundance (Catherine Hardwicke) and I must say that I was pleasantly surprised, the movie begins, less more and goes up slowly and gradually. I do not understand the mania of the "americanitos of a foot" for being "the most popular" damn I when I went to class it was simpler than a pot at school and not passing anything anyway. I return to where I was, after this small thinking aloud, the work of the actors has seemed sensational, highlighting a Holly Hunter in State of grace!FUCKING GREAT! (come on) and a history (based on a real event, the experiences of the writer, who plays the role of Evie Zamora on the tape) solid and seamless. Also I liked the soundtrack, although for my taste it was a tad strident and had times that did not understand a shit of what spoke. (and that have seen it in you) go, heard more noise than voices. You have called me attention, come another reflection (joer I am sembrao at this time) that when I was 13 years old not was thinking or in messing, nor in liar I, nor in smoking, nor in smoking dope, or in nothing of the sort. but I spent the day doing the jerk, playing football in my district, "plates", in the pool in the summer making the gili and little else. !!Joer that grow the kids today! I have to watch my niece that the remains a year to fall into such fatidica age. Anyway, the movie I loved and found me sobervia, one of those large tapes that certainly we should not miss.
2,325
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2538
Rafa Ferrer
Mar abierto
1
5
muchocine
Lovers of diving maybe you like, but we will if you are doubtful, as I was before seeing her!Flee from it like the plague! (Vaaaamos).
I spoke of the film makes enough, in the wording of the page in which I collaborated habitually, and honestly, when I saw the trailer this summer not too caught my attention, while I had heard quite a few opinions, some good and some bad (everything as botica) However today that had a free moment I have arranged to see her and I can only say that I was disappointed a lot; made with digital image, last milestone in film and last nonsense that many directors have brought to display a much more realistic image, and above the everlasting based in facts real to give us almost to title of "dogma of faith" an argument that follow foot juntillas and which at times is simpler and more boring than he expected when I started to see it!And that just takes 79 minutes! (not sure I stay asleep in the armchair).The tape only has a couple of notable moments and sometimes even reminded me the infinity of tapes that I get to see everytime I visit some friends (newlyweds) to their homes after a vacation/honeymoon or anything else. The epilogue is perhaps the most shocking and ultimately somewhat unexpected a priori has been what has made me be able to change position in the armchair in which homer Simpson was already making a small hole to sleep.Lately "Artisan" (an independent distributor and that shone not long ago with their high-quality tapes) me doing see each truyo size!Cosmic!Anyway, maybe diving lovers you like, but we will if you are doubtful, as I was before seeing her!Flee from it like the plague! (Vaaaamos).
2,326
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1356
Yojimbo
La vida secreta de las palabras
2
5
muchocine
But this movie will be named as masterpiece, pure cinema and everything you want because it is? jar? do and? herposa?, but is artificial pure cinema.
I have seen the vaunted "masterpiece" and a promising Isabel Coixet film. I went with eager to see it because it is one of the promises of the film Spanish for this year, even if it is shot in English and with an international cast which is only Javier camera by Spanish side. Produce the Almodóvar and MediaPro.Como do not want to give too much advertising, I will only say that it complies with the typical topics of work that wants to be deep and dense. Repeated constants: characters with a terrible secret drama in his past (in this case add a protagonist completely anticipada and bitter), and everything serves to a supposed explosion of contained emotions that serves as a nexus of Union between two people alone and injured reluctantly. To that sounds like the typical ponderous explanation of "indie"?Therefore this is. This film reflects how to make a perfect artificial drama, how to try to get tears and emotions of the most childish way (although the Robbins-Polley relationship are the best moments) and switch the attention of naïve form of a personal drama to a collective tragedy. One of the most attractive things in the scripts is that have the characters without express it verbally or at least not openly or directly.But this movie will be named as work teacher, pure cinema and whatever they want because it is "jar" and "herposa" and perfectly meets all the canons of "indie" film as compliant with the clichés of action cinema one of Van-Damme, but is artificial pure cinema. And like everything else, it will have its viewers, faithful, followers and admirers? and detractors.
2,327
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4261
Andrés Pons
The Mad
2
5
muchocine
Development too abused humor unfinished decide towards the horror pure or the humorous leaving half in both directions.
Double debut of the unknown director John KALANGIS, say double because he made his debut in the horror film but with much comedy and in addition is the first job that comes to our country. As actor however already saw in my big Greek wedding at his side in the direction still unpublished comedies JACK I JILL and LOVE IS WORK.Both featured her actress SHAUNA MCDONALD to fetish in is occasion adds a BILLI ZANE at their lowest moment although his career by removing isolated from TITANIC success was never too relevant.Starts well is series (b) typical of ZOMBIES, with lucky GAGS, good GORE effects, mix really hilarious moments.However is only a mirage because development too abused humor unfinished decide towards the horror pure or the humorous leaving half in both directions. Makeup may catalog of catastrophic removing credibility to the man-eaters of meat. Once more a good initial idea stays on very little thing in the absence of imagination to continue along the same path.A shame.
2,328
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3773
Andrés Pons
El hombre de mimbre
5
5
muchocine
I just remember the reason for my love of Padre this genus with one of the masterpieces not only British horror but the film in general.
Do you know? Sometimes one can lose perspective of what is true horror film, you go to the film premieres where you have the same approach over and over again. Direct releases to DVD are the most often copies of recent successes where taught four tits something Gore bad miss and so classified us in horror film when it is not or film of any kind.I just remember the because of my perpetual love this not only genre with one of the masterpieces of British horror cinema in general if not.ROBIN HARDY is one of those strange cases of an author that performs a Magnum Opus to disappear without a trace except for some small TV as for example the otherworldly.A sensational cast at all times helps the plot with the Dracula CHRISTOPHER LEE or the SEX SIMBOL BRITT EKLAND who at that time lived stardom in work featured in the genus with macabre refuge or night without end. Without forgetting the great actor protagonist that his role as religious man in the face of EDWARD WOODWARD seen in young WINSTON or the current outboard fatal weapon.This is one of those films that his debut did not deserved being the passage of time that ultimately impact her placed in the large jewel which is today. Unclassifiable moments where it is mixed intrigue, terror and even the music with an elegance rarely seen. Also be reflex masterfully Pagan beliefs and HIPPIES communities helped with a mammoth soundtrack reminiscent to CORAL records.Adoradoras naked nymphs of sex, cruelty at all times with a duel between the superstitions and Christian faith, its enormous photography is another claim into a feature film that no doubt is left marked to fire in the retina of the Viewer.The Remake of the same name starring NICOLAS CAGE is a joke, the director ROBIN HARDY will again count on CHRISTOPHER LEE in 2008 with COMBOYS FOR CHRIST.
2,329
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/170
Silvia
Tapas
4
5
muchocine
Any of us could be the protagonist of this story. Or is there maybe someone that not "tape" anything?
Prawns in garlic sauce, croquettes, anchovies in vinegar, baby squid, Squid in batter, omelette, spicy banderillas. There are covers of all types: more salty, sweeter more acidic. The film Tapas menu brings together all the ingredients and flavors to achieve the status of five forks. After success at the Festival of film Spanish of Malága, where he earned the award for the best film, the audience and the best actress award, the success of this tragicomedy seems assured.On the other side of the Firebox, José Corbacho and Juan Cruz chefs have developed his directorial debut simmered, since that have taken more than four years in shaping your master plate. A bittersweet ration in which mixed the stories of ordinary people who lives in a neighborhood of city and glimpse their fears, their hopes and their disappointments. Directors and screenwriters Corbacho and Juan Cruz carried the viewer of tapas in a neighborhood of the city of L'Hospitalet taking a walk by the lives of five characters so everyday that they are family. They are very different characters but with something in common: all have some secret that hide, something to cover. All cover their misery under a false appearance of honesty. Hence the double meaning of the title of the film. On the one hand the tape speaks daily covers lunch with which everyone has grown, while on the other stresses the secrets or insecurities that cover people daily. The character who gives life María Galiana ("Solas") is one of the most surprising in terms of unspeakable secrets referred, especially for the bonus you get wheeling and dealing with young people who sell drugs without anyone suspected. In a society like ours in which the most important is not but seem, hypocrisy and lies are the order of the day. There is no more than a ride for any bar and take a few lids to check feeds insubstantial social contact of gossip about neighbors or superficial comments on the future of the country. Conversations in which this kind of banal communication serves, perhaps also to cover or mask the existence of oneself.For the film parade characters we could find in any neighborhood of any city. Surely, we all know the typical owner of the bar in the corner of the neighborhood as Lolo (Ángel Andrés), whose wife leaves him because it puts your business at their relationship and, in principle, is not able to swallow your pride and go to look for her. His new kitchen Assistant newcomer China, revolves around the story of Lolo and Mao, some of the funniest and most satirical movie scenes. Perhaps also once we will have crossed with a pair of unconscious adolescents who only live to flirt and cover in drugs to escape from your everyday life. Rachel, on the other hand, is a woman that haunts the quarantine and refuge in the solitude of cyberspace without hope of finding a loving real until that one day a young man gives life believed lost. A brilliant Elvira Mínguez who does lack words to express bitterness and disenchantment that exudes his character. The history of love without limits of the old woman who lives only to satisfy her sick husband gives the film a brushstroke of tenderness. And it is that although the film takes the tone of light comedy, in the cracks of the narrative strain imperceptibly an air of sadness that frozen smile to make it a painful grimace. And it is that life - as reads the poster of the film - is like the padrón peppers, sometimes itches. and sometimes not.In the style of other Spanish directors such as Fernando León de Aranoa (quarter, Mondays in the Sun) or Icíar Bollaín (flowers from another world, Te doy mis ojos), but with a dose of humor, Corbacho and cross to portray the reality of the Spanish society of quite faithfully and without stridency. In time special effects and blockbuster Hollywood is difficult for a realistic dye film survive in the charts. However, the film brings together the precise ingredients so that the public is hooked to the seat during the 93 minutes that lasts the tape. Perhaps its limited duration prevents the Viewer to deepen a bit more in the stories, which better taste a dish that can leave hungry for more. And it is that when the room lights are lit, the viewer still digesting history, in which anyone can see reflected their own lives, their hopes and disappointments. Because in the movie appear universal themes such as loneliness, death, love, sex, friendship or hope. Cotidianidades with them living together the characters of this film and that they all face us on a daily basis. Because any of us could be the protagonist of this story. Or is there maybe someone that not "tape" anything?
2,330
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3432
Andrés Pons
Rec
5
5
muchocine
This cross between the Blair Witch and 28 days later is a new way of making films in Spain as well as deal with the Zombie genre little explored in our cinematography by removing specific examples. The saga the Templars, not desecrate the sleep of the dead and to a lesser extent some dandruff by Jesús Franco.
Horror movies is a genus that its maximum premise is the be scary or at least cause agonizing feelings in the Viewer. With the passage of time many deviated from this purpose by mixing genres comedy, action or even eroticism. In other circumstances be argued for Al GORE to make an impact with the blood but leaving aside the option of causing real nerves to the Viewer.If someone tells me that two Spanish directors seemed cuddly serian which encargarían after a long time serve as an overdose of real panic, an appalling horror at all times without any ornament or artifice. Here to shit pants without nonsense, really not I believe. Jaime Balaguero and Paco Plaza are the culprits that more than one suffers a heart attack in the coming months. Balaguero considered by all critics a sort of Messiah of the genre with success in all his films "DARKNESS, FRAGUILES" in my opinion it was a good director technically speaking but without the minimum hook for surprising or bring anything new.Paco plaza with ROMASANTA or second name showed the same for both more INRI as they joined in the joke called OT the movie. Nothing might therefore be expected in this new partnership, silent me the mouth making the best film of genus of long, using actors in very little weight just remarkable the name of presenter cuatrosfera Manuela Velasco transmitting at all times good ways that course handled the means to interpret virtually to yourself.This cross between the BLAIR Witch and 28 days later is a new way of making films in Spain as well as deal with the ZOMBIE genre little explored in our cinematography by removing specific examples. The saga the Templars, not desecrate the sleep of the dead and to a lesser extent some dandruff by Jesús Franco.
2,331
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1584
Caruco
Diamante de sangre
2
5
muchocine
Ideal for a quick consumption and, incidentally, to remove some awareness, between Dove and Dove.
Years ago that film left this idyllic view of Africa, well mystery and mysticism, and of a fascinating continent with large open spaces and landscapes filled with exoticism and dangers. It was the Africa adventurous and romantic from the seventies and eighties, was giving way to another type of treatment: the complaint and the drama of its inhabitants.A couple of seasons ago we had a good dose of the atrocities that were committed in interminable civil wars, "Hotel Rwanda"; and last year was "The constant gardener" which made us open our eyes on another made wild and criminal: the using its people as guinea pigs for large pharmaceutical industries. But, as already they managed to say the characters of one and another film, what happens to Africa and Africans, does not care (almost) anyone.One of the politicians that appear in "Blood diamond" also exposes the principle as: "the sad history of Africa is that whenever you find something of value its inhabitants suffer and die in misery." This has happened with ivory, with the gaucho, gold and oil. "And now with diamonds". And the use of slaves for decades, I might add.Child exploitation.On 1 December 2000, the general Assembly of the United Nations unanimously adopted a resolution to try to curb the trade in the dimantes in gross called "conflict zones", especially those from Angola and Sierra Leone. Rebel groups the Government used them to finance their bloody revolution.And that counting the plight of thousands of children used both as slaves in very long working hours extracting precious stones, such as children recruited as soldiers of the militia. In this regard, one of the best and most recent cries of denunciation from the world of entertainment has been the excellent song "Diamonds from Sierra Leone", no less brilliant rapper Kanye West (do and that begins with a? do sample? from the song by Shirley Bassey for the "diamonds are forever", in the 1971 James Bond).And this is also the best in the movie Edward Zwick, this attempt of complaint, and combine adventure and commitment by resorting to a format of blockbuster Hollywood whose list of actors is headed by two stars of the calibre of Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Connelly, to try to reach the widest possible audience. Another issue is if the film Ray to the same height. 'Fast-food' reassuring.Zwick Orchestra a plot of codidias on a huge pink diamond found Solomon Vandy (Djimon Hounsou), a native who only want to meet again to his wife and children which was separate; and the unexpected Alliance that you will find in a white, Danny Archer (DiCaprio), born also in Sierra Leone, and a mercenary in appearance without scruples, who only cares that precious stone in question, but that it will be taking party along his journey with Solomon, and the encounter with a beautiful journalist (Jennifer Connelly), who tries to expose the tragedy of this people.Brainwashing, Liberation slogans and drugs, even obliged to test the blood of the son of Solomon and the objective of rescuing him from the clutches of the revolutionaries, becomes the main axis of awareness and denunciation, together with consumer interests to help explode and sink over that country.But the film develops routinely, with dialogue full of clichés, with characters so one-dimensional as the same reporter, or villains that appear. A strenuous footage and a quality Bill, but still the most anodyne patterns of the more well-trodden entertainment you both want to be committed and reassuring. It is shocking, but nice; with its moments of drama well calculated, distancing themselves from the true protagonists of the tragedy, and ideal for a quick consumption and, incidentally, removing some awareness, between Dove and Dove.
2,332
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/730
Jose Contreras
Un buen año
2
5
muchocine
The Gladiator sometimes puts eyes feeling so deep and profound one is passed the function hoping that appear about his position Centurions and kill you the woman and the child.
I know that those who write film seem a bunch of embittered, we always see the glass half empty, and when everyone you pass it well feel obliged to draw the feet of the dish and find three feet to the cat. I do what I can by talk about cinema as a spectator of the street, as one of those who asked the Council as a friend. I try to set aside, above all, the nonsense of verismo, the film is fiction. Even so, there are products that I can with them as much as I strive. "A good year" is an example.A London broker without scruples, which collects the insults that send you as triumphs, inherits a vineyard of his uncle in Provence, and has to travel there to sell it. The House and the plantation are filled with memories for him, but are two other reasons that retain. Appears an illegitimate daughter in search of his identity that could claim their rights, and secondly, meets a woman of the place that it falls in love with at first sight.The contrast stressed urban life? rural life is nice if not because they have thrashed it hundreds of films before, and with much more content. The character of the soulless broker did many more observers directors delight, Scott helps to release a couple of phrases rough without the most remote relationship with grace. The future that awaits the protagonist in his bag Agency is represented by the Chief alarmed and obsessed with his Van Gogh which cannot see by security measures. The head of "Intolerable cruelty" of the Coens, was much more graphic full of cables and casing. There are side very useful to have clear which is the best choice you can do the protatonista.Illegitimate daughter is in the film so let's look at a feature of the heart of the broker, while it is an unnecessary feature, or worse still, disjointed.One of the characters in the film, the uncle, says who knows the trick of the comedy "the trick is in the rhythm". It can be that the guy knows, but the director certainly not. What prints more than an agility, is a species of spasmodic rhythm.Although I won't to the cinema to see what they do the actors, I usually thank them that they do not spoil me the story with their faces. They should not have hired Russell Crowe for a comedy, the Gladiator sometimes puts eyes feeling so deep and profound one is passed the function hoping that appear about his position Centurions and kill you the woman and the child.
2,333
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4100
Andrés Pons
Siete orquídeas manchadas de rojo
3
5
muchocine
Amazing in all aspects is this guiallo with all the characteristics of the genus exalted by people of the caliber of Mario bava and Dario Argento, blood GLUGs, well made deaths, intrigue conducted with wisdom of a script superbly structured seamless in its path.
If you read in a film directed by UMBERTO LENZI in the first thing you think is in the titles of the Italian kamikaze famous for his films on 1980s cannibals in fierce Cannibal or eaten alive. Authentic film absurdities that however took advantage of the exploitation of the era to lionize him in the art of the most extreme GORE.Amazing in all aspects is this guiallo with all the characteristics of the genus exalted by people of the caliber of Mario bava and DARIO ARGENTO, blood GLUGs, well made deaths, intrigue conducted with wisdom of a script superbly structured seamless in its path.Strikes the right direction in all aspects of the director, this magnificent photography and soundtrack, very correct interpretations of protagonist Antonio Sabato a well known actor in the Italian horror with many works to their backs. The Abbey of terror or REACTOR attest to the interpretative quality of the artist.A Guiallo to rediscover, notably brought to term by a filmmaker with a pretty bad reputation who at that time knew how to serve a good meal of frenetic pace, but maybe have some ups and downs in its plot.
2,334
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/733
Ricardo Marquina
Aquella casa al lado del cementerio
3
5
muchocine
It has everything you need to a horror film: House grade and damn, asshole characters down to the basement and blood, much blood.
While it is true that the drunk I got watching this film I disables input to speak of it, more true it is that the film frykandéliko can see serene, and much less if you're a person balanced. "I, as I am an unbalanced and in addition a drunken man confessed, enjoyed in my sofa, throne of the humble, this film of our amado-odiado favorite film speculator, Lucio Fulci.""The House next to the cemetery", crappy without the possibility of recovery shot in 1981, offers us the face more poetic and intuitive Italian "Director". Visual allegories, poetic rhythm and attempts of emotional intensity discover us that Fulci is also human, though, to not fuck his reputation, it offers us also, especially when the scripts flojean (or are blatantly tasteless), scenes of good and free gore, pain, suffering and sadism.The argument is not much, taking all need a horror film. Do home grade and damn, asshole characters that are relegated to the basement when it is clear that "something" happens, cute girl, child sometimes looks dead and blood, much worse sangre.¿Lo? That at times bored greatly, especially when he tries to give an impossible plot depth to the story and, more importantly, depth no one demanded, do or perhaps someone is going to see a movie by Fulci for his spiritual background? the best? When Fulci is Fulci and is dedicated to generate fear and to take guts, which is all that is worth this man. Good movie to see with colleagues.
2,335
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/996
Oscar Cantero
Fresas Salvajes
4
5
muchocine
Bergman in its purest form. At the same time sensitive, tough cryptic and heartbreaking.
The day I started to see "Source of the maiden", Ingmar Bergman was a little scared as to expectation after hearing comments about cryptic of the great Swedish cinema. When the screening ended, I stayed a while in silence, reflecting, and it was then that I decided to continue discovering the work of the Nordic director. "The seventh seal" first and then "Wild strawberries", which is the film of which deal with these lines.Wild strawberries introduces us squarely in the mind of a doctor who attends their retirement and that along the journey up the University where the honors will be developed (which decided last minute to perform in car after a strange dream) makes a tour inside by what has been his life. A life full of contrasts, like any other person. A great man for the majority, but not to his son, who always judged harshly. NI for her daughter-in-law, or even the person that seems closest to him, to be his housekeeper. Bergman shows us the twilight of a superb, disciplined and hard man, but it also evokes moments of tenderness of his youth, in his summer home. It is a duality which probably lies within each of us, but that is difficult to portray with mastery and sensibility that Bergman makes here.So, halfway between the real and surreal, shows us a man strong, severe weaknesses, but that at the same time provided as it has escaped the life of hands without having demonstrated that he is as capable of love as any other person. All this adorned by an extraordinary interpretation and a magnificent handling of shadows and lights at a time in which the media, obviously, were not those of now. And finally, the end open, typical in Swedish. Although perhaps lack a bit of consistency to the script in general. As if you were things in the dark. Something that would most likely move so that the spectator reflect on these small gaps that seem to exist.At least, this is what has seemed to me, although clear, sure that escape me many things, because, why deny it, Bergman was a director to which cost work understand in its entirety.
2,336
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1957
Daniel Galindo
La vida en rosa
4
5
muchocine
Away from the biography to the use, convinced by the 'real' profile which outlined about the artist Edith Piaf, whose songs became anthems for different generations.
The problem of approaching a myth is that many of their fans? although this would not be the correct term - can return against you. That was the risk that ran Olivier Dahan with this portrait of a sacred legend for our neighbours to the North. How can win so difficult to penetrate audiences? The answer is simple: with an actress that transform tearing the skin and looking for from within the personality of a character which have references to bore. It has done so Marion Piaf, forgiveness, Cotillard, unrecognizable in its transformation: scratching found the actress took justice into their own hands in long courtship Sunday and entered the universe of Tim Burton with Big Fish.Si a song evokes a State of mind, a film must do the same: provoke emotions and stir the sleeping feelings. What was considered responsible for this audiovisual biography supported in scars and triumphs biased to consciousness in order to serve as a vehicle to a time past and recreated not only by the fragrances decorators, but also by sharing Excel where Gerard Depardieu and Emmanuelle Seigner.Igual that occurs when one reads a book and recreates it in his minda character of legend comes to life in our minds after having received countless information impacts. In this way, La Vie en Rose (the film, not the song) is an idealization of a star from a compilation of cuts in press, hearings of his discography, official biographies and personal perceptions? these are the greater part of the cake.Popular fundamentalism and destructive minds of some critics can condition the future of this laudable work, similar to the of the recent Lola, the film, with a glorious Gala Évora. After this Iberian chauvinist comment? to make parallels between two artists, two myths — we can only emphasize that their footage which, though compensated by an excellent soundtrack, partly undermines the capacity of impact that holds this portrait of La Môme since their first frame, which initiates a passionate and exciting life may seem excessive.
2,337
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3501
Silvia Giner
Leones por Corderos
3
5
muchocine
Robert Redford is without doubt one of the best and most honorable actors of our age, fantastic actor, passionate director and producer implemented, shows which is perhaps her most committed film socially speaking.
I saw this movie a few weeks ago and it caused me such mental straw that I have been unable to write about it until now.We are faced with a film whose political vision parallelizes with the vision of two students who decide to join ranks and the desperate attempt of a teacher to save the soul of which considers his best student. Such parallelism between these 3 stories whose background lies in the same theme, shows intimate way and with original narrative, as sometimes or rather always, Lions (ploíticos, people influential.) use sheep (people excited, young, passionate, humble) to fulfil its objectives according to what they think right and proper and that power generates just one thing: desire for more power.Robert Redford is without doubt one of the best and most honorable actors of our age, fantastic actor, passionate director and producer implemented, shows which is perhaps her most committed film socially speaking. Lions for Lambs deserves a hole in our shelves of DVDs and is that as director, Redford serves a narrative so special as personal but absolutely recommended.If you have the overwhelming feeling of being overtaken by the political message of this film, it is that you has stalled, I like the films that invite reflection and against many opinions I have to say that this is a film that "invited" to think more does not "require" or "encourages" thinking about the political ideas of the director. It is a "this is what friends take out you their own comclusiones".
2,338
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/394
Alvaro Oliva
United 93
4
5
muchocine
It is not that United 93 is bad or boring but that he expected more than one director is capable of making wonders.
"Usually happens when someone puts the very high expectations you take a downturn or it simply does not cover them, and this is what has happened to me with the new Paul Greengrass movie.""Bloody Sunday" seems brutal, of the best films that have been made in recent years. And clear, with this precedent and the poster full of criticism that put it as the best film of the year then? passes what happens. This does not mean that "United 93" is bad, or boring, only expected a server more than one director who is able to do wonders.In the script there are two differentiated parts: concerning the interior of the aircraft and which shows the chaos that occurs in other places, whether airports and control centres. And it is here where one seduces me completely and another not. The refusal is the interior of the plane, which seems more forced and less credible. Which gives you sense of film, instead the part of drivers, responsible for the army and other comrades is do you really think that you are living this live, as it was the case in "Bloody Sunday" and it is a pity because having managed to convince and keep the feeling that conveys in the above-mentioned locations, if we would be faced with the best or one of the best films of the year.However it is a great and interesting film.
2,339
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/284
Jose Contreras
La casa del lago
3
5
muchocine
Film full of inconsistencies, but also full of successes and spells that get moved to the coldest
The doctor Kate Forster, who plays Sandra Bullock, listen to a girl, his patient, talk about his MOM. His mother tells that no matter leave a man, because there's always one just around the corner. The physician listens and corrects her: "can one also are old waiting for to appear that man." It was not an innocent conversation, they are talking about the same principe azul which talk about the film. They talk about if we are left with the man that serves to muddle through or if we play everything for a dream.Alejandro Agresti is based on a Korean film ("Siworae") which in turn is based on a novel by Jiro Asada. However, Agresti has sought a benchmark West in a novel by Jane Austen, "Persuasion", to speak of the love and time. In "Persuasion", the lovers decide to give a time before joining, but when they become to see already is too late for them. "The Lake House", the doctor is close to a House that is in the middle of a lake and there begins a correspondence with the former tenant who lived two years earlier. We do not have any explanation to tell us why emails from a man who lived in 2004 appear in 2006 and which she sends in 2006 appear in 2004. The paradox serves to speak of the distance, because any event decide, he will have to wait two years, and in those two years many things can happen. One of those things is that it may change your mind within their own future, for example in 2007, whereupon, he would not appear in the quote from the 2006 because he would feel abandoned in 2005. The appeal of the two years serves to play. If a letter can travel through time, there are many other wonders that can occur. It is a premise full of suggestions that enriches the very Jane Austen. "Austen had a Victorian world to seduce her lovers, Agresti has the world of temporary jumps that have become everyday for the viewer of today thanks to films such as journey to the future, Terminator, the butterfly effect, Paycheck.""The Lake House" is a film full of inconsistencies. Very strong bet with the theme of the temporal paradox, so "our friends the logical", as he called them Hitchcock, do very easy. But it is full of successes and spells that get moved to the cooler. She approaches him from the future ahead of its bad moments, he cares since last leaving traces.
2,340
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3648
Heitor Pan
La brújula dorada
3
5
muchocine
I am sure that enough substance is lost in the transition from page to screen, but even so, the film is entertaining and exciting, capable of transporting the viewer into a parallel world.
Yes, it seems that they have been in Hollywood to an efficient fellow to find children's literary sagas to adapt to the big screen and they are going like hotcakes. We have had up to now to Harry Potter, "The six signs of light", "The Chronicles of Narnia" and some more that I probably forget and suddenly comes "The Golden Compass", based on the "Dark matter" saga of Phillip Pullman. In addition the package comes with controversy including once more stale and conservative Catholic gritase from the rooftops that this story is a heresy case of great, prompting a further curiosity in me.The starting point has quite a few points in common com many of these youth books. A pre-teen protagonist who lives in a universe parallel to our own, where human beings are accompanied by talking animals, bearers of the soul of the owner, is confronted with a malevolent institution that tries to hide from the world scientific truth to power dominate the reason for people without problems. It thus becomes involved in an adventure that will draw it of his grey life towards other territories and worlds and that will take you to know a lot of peculiar characters along the way.As we can see, the criticism of the Church is not veiled and second reading but direct and slaughter. Even so, although it takes to criticize so openly (and so I understand this will more in subsequent deliveries), Pullman manages to give his fantasy of action to abundance and endearing characters. I am sure that enough substance is lost in the transition from page to screen, but even so, the film is entertaining and exciting, with care special effects, an atmosphere capable of transporting the viewer into a parallel world and some performances that greatly help the development of the adventure.Nicole Kidman in a very bad role in which is moved to taste, Daniel Craig making Aristocrat, Eva Green in the role of witch with broom and all good and the great Sam Elliot, one of my favorite side, which saw in the mediocre "Ghost rider" in a very similar role. In addition, to decide to view it in original version enjoy also the voices of Freddie Highmore (the kid from "Charlie and the chocolate factory" or "Finding Neverland"), Kathy Bates, Ian McKellen or Kristin Scott Thomas. perhaps the negative note is where almost always in these cases. It is very difficult to find a kid to carry the weight of history without clash, the prodigies do not appear like mushrooms. In this case, newcomer Dakota Blue Richards can not cause desire that one bears the clearing, but it certainly is far below the level of the rest of the actors.Anyway, one is soon forgotten of performances and other nonsense is the story that manages to transport us to worlds of fantasy, where a warrior bear friends, can make us be saved by an army of compasses, mounted on escóbulas (sorry, I had to make the joke) or have in our possession a golden compass to be able to gossip to taste on those around us.After a movie like this, you enter one wanting to embark on a new literary adventure and discover the books of Pullman.
2,341
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/286
Oscar Cantero
A todo gas 3: Tokyo race
3
5
muchocine
Fun movie entertainment, to have a good time and for enjoyment of the lovers of cars, without more pretensions
Justin Lin Taiwanese runs the last installment of the Rob Cohen, who in the year 2001 began with Vin Diesel and Paul Walker company. This third production does not have both renowned actors, but the spirit remains the same as in the previous two. The hair-raising races, impressive cars and adrenaline through the roof are its hallmarks, dressed this time by the Asian exoticism of Tokyo. Narrow, winding and full of dangers streets give further tension development of the competition. The film narrates the adventures of Shaun Boswell, a boy deeply Geekish and apathetic that the only thing that interests you are street racing cars. His hobby makes it not precisely be the favorite guy from the police. And as what bad goes wrong ends, a judge threatens to imprison him the slightest slip. This is why that decides to take abroad for a while to avoid the temptation. Your destination will be the home of his uncle, a soldier stationed in Japan, in the city of Tokyo. There, cradle of illegal races and where cars alcazan degrees of sophistication unknown, it will test a vehicle in a bet without knowing that belongs to the Yakuza, the Japanese mafia, which will pay by making orders and piloting in the wildest situations. Love will play an important role in the development of the events. All gas: Tokyo race is a fun film and entertainment, to have a good time for enjoyment of the lovers of cars, without more pretensions. By the way, a curious fact worth say that during the shooting of this film was shattered, approximately eighty cars.
2,342
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3430
Alvaro Oliva
Tierra
3
5
muchocine
Very interesting option and that deserves to be seen by the excellent work of recording, for extreme situations, delight us with wonderful prints and for raising a bit of what is happening around us.
Narrated by Constantine Romero (in our version), "the film of our planet Earth" shows us problems and avatars that have to suffer the animals to survive.Despite the fact that they show us more races, the protagonists of this story are three: a polar bear, a pair of humpback whales and elephants.Obviously, there is an entity which takes the leading role, and is none other than our planet, which he gradually loses its ability to give us and provide us with life, and through this collection of hours of material, we can appreciate how it affects and affect the inhabitants of this beautiful (and little care) environment.Nature is often cruel, and part of this law of life for us is shown in this documentary, it has amazing and astonishing beauty, that deserve to be seen on the big screen and not on television.However, the footage is a little heavy at certain times. In short, "Earth" is presented as an option very interesting and different to where they usually have in the halls, and that deserves to be seen by the excellent work of recording, for extreme situations, by delight with wonderful prints, see the suffered lives of some animals, and raising a little of what is happening around us.
2,343
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/620
Jeremy Fox
La increíble historia de Caperucita Roja
3
5
muchocine
The worst production of animation that I've seen this year, but no matter, because it compensates for everything with a witty script about charismatic characters and a devilish pace.
Often cited the lack of budget as one of the main reasons why the Spanish animation (I think especially in Dygra) isn't generally live up to expectations. According to this reasoning, lack of money would lead to a technical precariousness of the film that resulted ultimately in a poor film quality.These arguments are obviously false, but if you would need to prove it, "the incredible but true story of little Red Riding Hood" (Tyler) is a low blow to all those who defend. And it is that comparisons are so odious as sometimes necessary.From a technical point of view we are faced with the worst production of animation I've seen this year. The film, co-directed by Todd Edwards and Tony Leech, and directed by Cory Edwards is the impressive visual power light years to which Pixar has accustomed us. But no matter, because it compensates for everything with a witty script (a great tribute to the "Rashomon" by Kurosawa), charismatic characters and a devilish pace that not even the songs get break (although something free aren't anything annoying and, by the way, is very funny). I.e., quite the opposite of "El sueño de una noche de San Juan" (see Moonfleet criticism).The film immerses us in the life of the forest, where a mysterious character is killing the business of pastry base steal their recipe books. Little Red Riding Hood decides to save that of his grandmother taking him to it, but arriving at his house it is found to be locked in the closet, the Wolf in its place and a crazed woodcutter who bursts on stage. Arriving police in the forest, these characters will have to give their versions of what happened. Updates for that will be very different?It is obvious, reading the synopsis and seeing the film, that its implementation had been unthinkable not previously exist the success of "Shrek". But this not away merits to a humble, modest, risky and highly entertaining production that, despite all its limitations, becomes easily in one of the sympathetic released this year. Final rating: 6.5 out of 10.
2,344
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3260
Kiko de España
Lío embarazoso
3
5
muchocine
Imagine the guys from Superbad a few years later. Each has pursued its path and more or less survive as they can, even if it is on the basis of compensation. It has everything what is usual in the new USA comedy and the formula is still alive.
Second test of madurezImaginemos to the Superbad boys a few years later. Each has pursued its path and more or less survive as they can, even if it is on the basis of compensation. After overcoming (I already say, more or less) the difficulties of adult life and try to feel proud for something other than smoking with colleagues and see naked in movies to compile them in a web doomed to failure, see where you discover one that can still climb a little more in this "do more, be respected and take pride in the family". I is I think, at the moment, as the Portas of the film at the beginning (what the hell, I still think as the Superbad) and why I think almost touching the approach that Apatow gives his new movie, in which a fumeta becomes the great mistake of a mujerón with clear things in life and in principle, without room for such freak.The rest of (so excessively long as endearing) footage is the opportunity it gives you to him and vice versa.Full of side spectacular (while Paul Ruud makes time that is a reality) has everything what is usual in the new USA comedy with three gags of the best of the year, delicious band sound and as for "the first part" (and I am referring to Superbad), an honesty that I laugh of Dr. House maybe the incredible thing is that that girl bundle with that boy, but if the stars are where they need to be and it's crazy celebrations overnight and one abused his single step of dance, hell, can occur. That is why it is a movie and why is a comedy.A wonderful and touching comedy.
2,345
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3063
Rafa Ferrer
Fido
2
5
muchocine
An original tape in its approach, which however just entering too many clichés.
They said in "South Park" that Canadians have something special, and since then, it cannot be otherwise that coincidentally in Canada have decided to make a very special comedy, while Edgar Wright has already done something similar with "Zombies Party" (Shaun of the dead) where the mythical duo Simon Pegg & Nick Frost have become "world famous", this is another way of seeing things, and integrate the happy 50 years in the States with a tape on zombies is an original way of doing things.Highlights in the cast, Carrie Anne Moss, the mythical Trinity in the series "Matrix", as the mother of the boy protagonist, as well as the eccentric Billy Connolly, here unrecognizable as zombie, that gives title to the film (Fido), as well as one of the side of countless films, Dylan Baker, not to mention the appearance of one of the familiar faces in the Cohen Brothers film, I speak of Tim Blake Nelson, that here is a neighbor that has a curious (and sexy) Companion.It seems less curious, as Andrew Currie knows how to integrate into American Society of the 1950s a group of zombies, as pet and that a few minutes of footage can even pretend "normalcy", with a home that reminds the Romero films, or more specifically their 1st big success "The night of the living dead".In some lances the film comes to remind other tapes of the genre, such as "An amazing gang" or "Do not kill." "to the neighbour", as well as "pleasantville" and is much more ingrained component of this comedy (and little original) what one pending, and in some bars one has the feeling of what to show on screen, although original (therefore no doubt) has a "aftertaste" to "already seen".In short, a tape original in its approach, which however just entering too many clichés; by the way, I understand that its premiere in Spain occur only on the shelves of the video shops, go, which will go directly to DVD.
2,346
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/89
Flopir
Munich
4
5
muchocine
Entertaining, impeccably directed story, autocrìtico and reflective
The Munich Olympics in 1972 became the history for the murder of 11 Israeli athletes by Palestinian terrorist group "Black September". Directed by Steven Spielberg, the film begins by describing the fact, but only to give rise to what came later, the consequences. Here is where appears Avner (Eric Bana, who rose to fame with Hulk and Troy), Mossad agent, service secret Israeli, chosen to lead a group of five men which aims to kill the Palestinians responsible for the tragedy, those in different European countries. The way in which the film unfolds, at a superficial level, might convince some surprise that Munich is an action film. Clearly has all the ingredients that make gender honor: a heroic quasi main character, even with its weaknesses and miseries, a climate of tension that not lapses at any point in the film, missions of mission impossible style, and even moments and dialogs comic and pins, including a memorable style Spielberg staging, where Palestinians and Jews meet by chance in a house they rented to an informant and have no choice but to share a room, listening to music together, hiding their true identities and who would say, passing a good time. But not. The conflict Palestinian - Israeli is a sensitive and always trigger subject of disputes. Munich is no exception to this, and here is where lies the greatness of this film: in his reading, in his treatment on the subject, sobe everything if we consider that its director professes the Jewish religion, which hinders the impartiality, target too high to which any director could aspire. Spielberg almost achieved, with an entertaining story, impeccably directed, autocrìtico and reflective. Highly recommended.
2,347
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1182
Rafa Ferrer
Xmen3
3
5
muchocine
In this installment is tilda everything a little more dramatic that the precedents, we are witnessing the disappearance of several heroes to those who in one way or another we got love in his previous appearances on screen then.
Third (and so far final) installment of the adventures of the characters that Bryan Singer took to the big screen 6 years ago, now with the relay of Brett Ratner as director, and with part of the protagonist of the two previous films cast; It is true that note still "work" in production of Singer, as it retains its potential and/or narrative style, as well as the visual, though, on the other hand, perhaps Ratner does some kind of style? In this installment is tilda everything a little more dramatic than in the precedents, we are witnessing the disappearance of several heroes to those who in one way or another we got love in his previous appearances on screen, it is this tape, rather than possible closure to the saga (although then there is more than one Spin Off starring Wolverine)(, or by any other Member of the patrol X).Normal actors, much or little, nor to go mad (who said "G men") and is that you unless the debutantes, the majority of the actors is them comfortable sees a character are already 6 years approaching the public, by the way, the brotherhood of mutants malignant where have awakened them? Is it the same be mutant to be tacky? Before concluding, I do not like anything the score John Powell has composed for the film, with a dramatic air of "Antena 3 Telefilm" bordering the absurd, I liked most of John Ottman's second delivery, especially the "suite" that opened the film and the CD and which served as almost a "fanfare" in this saga of Marvel.
2,348
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/532
Enrique Colmena
Salvador
4
5
muchocine
Vibrant, emotive, splendid story against the death penalty, not in the abstract but very notably, the of of this chico dreamer who made a mistake of dream and ended up landing in a nightmare.
In 1974 the Franco regime ajusticiaba their penultimate political prisoners; and I say penultimate, and not last, as the official oblivion has been saying from this film, because we must remember that in the following year, 1975, in September, still ajusticiaría to five inmates more. It is possible that the confusion is that, while the here biografiado Puig Antich and Polish (which turned out to be the East German, reportedly) Heinz Chez were executed by garrote vil, of 1975, members of ETA and FRAP (clear, who now remembers the FRAP, and not mention of what it meant its acronym?), were shot. Out of that nuance, there goes another: this film is entitled "Salvador Puig Antich", and is thus registered in the Ministry of culture. Therefore, holder her, in plan buddy, "Salvador", as it is commonly the case in the media, is not correct. And go with the film: I have to say that I was a pleasant surprise. Expected me the typical life of Holy layman, as today, with the consequent political plan tostón pamphlet, is so common and I found, however, a film that, although their first twenty or thirty minutes do suffer from these shortcomings, with ideologization antiquated butt, from the moment in which Puig Antich is arrested, changes radically: we are then faced with the tragedy of a man certainly wrong (the utopia that pregonaba the Iberian liberation movement)(, Thousand, to which he belonged, was a careful marcianada), but that, even in the case that, as it seemed, had killed a policeman in a fracas, was had been die executed. Those who read Criticalia know of my uncompromising stand against terrorism: I am that, as said Gandhi, is of the view that there are many causes which they worth the penalty die, but none that would be worthwhile kill. Having said that, no one, not even the State, can assume the power to kill anyone; is another thing that some (which these days give the song after a fence of methacrylate?) is deserve to rot in prison? "Salvador Puig Antich" then becomes a vibrant, emotive, splendid story against the death penalty, not in the abstract but very notably, the of of this chico dreamer who made a mistake of dream and ended up landing in a nightmare. The tension will accumulate through the successive moments in which his lawyer and next are trying to avoid the finger of fate, which fatally drawn to this Catalan guy, and whose confirmation as reo's death would be given by the assassination of Carrero (which the regime decided to give a warning, although Salvador and his group had nothing to do with the famous Txikia command of ETA)(do, which was who ordered the heavens the Admiral?) It will be the point of no return. All of this is given with emotion, but without incurring the tear. The heart shrinks, but not so the central characters, only they do, AWE by terror that lies ahead and can not, even though they want to avoid crying. Beautifully recreating the era, based not only on costumes, hairdresser and props, large size (cars, locations, posters), but also of small details, the film narrates with great likelihood that deaf fear that lived in the Franco regime, when the police was not perceived by the population as a protection, as it is fortunately the case now, but as a threat. That deaf fear reflected in the face of Leonor Watling was which was then a fear insurmountable but perfectly understandable: is that stems from fear towards the total impunity with which the State, which should theoretically ensure the citizen however harassed you permanently. Brilliant realization of Manuel Huerga, since "Antarctica" is not put after the cameras – although with some perdonables bugs, is yours an address visually very creative, also with a good rhythm narrative. Performers, with special mention to Daniel Brühl, who embodies perfectly this kid got a scrubbing that overcame him; quote to Leonor Watling, always so wonderful actress, also in a little grateful role must also be.
2,349
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1775
Pruden Rodríguez
300
4
5
muchocine
300 is a work 100% entertainment, 100% aesthetic quality, 100% rate and, in short, a well told story that won't think too much, but to be completely mesmerized spectators during two hours.
Sometimes one refuses to believe that more than one million people may be right. Time shows that box office figures tend not to talk about the quality of the product and, in a way, the demanding Viewer (others call him proud, erudite, arrogant, cult, alternative, arrogant, or none of these, or all at once) tends to associate taquillazo with pastelazo. However, these terms do not have to be synonymous to the force. It is the case of 300.Si well it is true that have found me a very good film, I must also clarify me uncheck those you see here a before and a later in the film, or those who consider that 300 is a perfect, total, sublime film. It may be a 10, as a product of entertainment but if the film is much more than that, and I think Yes, it happens not notable movie.The history, or the history of the history, already know. 300 recreates his way to the battle of Thermopylae, imitating the eponymous comics by Frank Miller, which in turn was inspired by the 1961 film "The 300 espartans" (translated as "The lion of Sparta"). Historical facts in it were collected by Herodotus of Halicarnassus (484aC-425dC) in his work "Historiae" or "Nine books of history", where this and other battles the Greeks maintained with barbaric peoples (especially against the Persians in the Greco-Persian wars) are narrated with more fidelity. His story has been the primary source of information for others.Despite this, no wait a historical movie. More is, that no one leave the film thinking that you know a little more to the Spartans and Persians (well, if to hear Spartan thought in a liberator of slaves, and to hear Persian only came you to mind a cat with long hair, then can that Yes, you can have learned something). Frank Miller has never denied that what attracted him all this was the essence. In fact, neither the Spartans were 300, nor fought naked, nor the ten thousand Immortals were dressed as for Halloween, or Ephialtes was a misshapen hunchback, nor a long etcetera. I.e., the work is not a faithful Chronicle of what happened in the Gorge, but for authors I must point out that they have never tried to sell it as well. Wrong who uses these arguments to discredit her.Now, a film must sustain itself. If you read a dozen of interviews the Director, critical tropecientas to what most lucid, and look at all the extras of the dvd so you it looks perfect, it means that something is wrong. I don't care if 300 lies more or less, but miss some of the context, some subplot with force, more than espadazos right and left. The captive film for its aesthetic, for his photograph, for its frenetic pace. but after a few days (the more savvy may not require more than a few minutes) you realize that leaves no footprint as much as it might seem. I will not remember with special affection any character (or even none of the actors and actresses that embodied), I will not highlight the argument in any conversation (300 hold the stakes of a million to defend his people), not particularly excites me the issue of Fund (the defence of the freedom at all costs, a patriotic roll very to American taste) and, in short, I can never consider 300 is a work as perfect as some claim.That Yes, the good thing that no one is removed. 300 is a work 100% entertainment, 100% aesthetic quality, 100% rate and, in short, a well told story that won't think too much, but to be completely mesmerized spectators during two hours. One of the best epic movies of all time.
2,350
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2940
Iñaki Bilbao
Un Corazón Invencible
3
5
muchocine
It is not a superb film, but good, with good editing and excellent soundtrack and photography, to get what he wants.
Interesting political drama, based on sad facts in elaño 2003. It happened in Karachi (Pakistan), and enter in the multiple events that occurred following the destruction of the twin towers in New York (USA.)(UU).Surrendered and painful tribute to all those people who gave their lives for ideals and love of work well done, and that given by banner to the truth, they tried in find out the causes, connections and ramifications of the cancer of terrorism which ravaging and continues to plague the world.Winterbottom, uses its particular rhythm narrative, that is, to catch-up, measured, care during much of the footage, especially in the scenes intimate and everyday, full of great sensitivity, and explosive on the (several raids by the police and pakistani army) action scenes. And get this great truth, by giving realism and ability of conviction to the bleak history, with moments of love and affection, and other violence and cruelty, although we never see it explicitly.Excellent commissioning scene, that was said there that tends to the coldness, although I do not agree with this. It is possible that it won't excite, but Winterbottom runs away from the plague of the easy tear, although its final minutes could contribute to this, but more by the intrinsic force of the images, as because the director search them at all costs.Good performances, especially of Irfan Khan, as the captain, and Anjelina Jolie, a very sober except when already can not more. In my view, it is not a superb film, but good, with good editing and excellent soundtrack and photography, that manages what it intends to pay tribute to people that I quoted at the beginning of the comment and expose the hard days of a woman who has lost the person who wants more.
2,351
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1729
Francisco Bellón
Fundido a negro
3
5
muchocine
With fade to black Oliver Parker offers us a well structured and seamless thriller with one of the great masters in the history of the film starring: Orson Welles.
Rather than spread the fashion of the biopics, plague strikes the film without the least hint of pity or compassion, was not strange to see movies featuring real characters that unfolded in a plot of fiction, always with a real historical background (such as down the iron curtain, Tim Robbins). So he could bring to the average viewer figure of great characters, but not showing their miseries and glories, but showing an environment where it could function as a fictional character more.With fade to black Oliver Parker rescues the best spirit of such films, offering a well structured and seamless thriller with one of the great masters in the history of the film starring: Orson Welles. History tells us the arrival of Welles (Danny Huston) to Rome in 1948 to shoot a film, black magic. During filming, a the supporting actor dies in her arms whispered to the ear his last words. In this way, Welles is immersed in a dangerous plot of murder with important political ramifications. Based on the novel by Davide Ferrario, renowned British director Oliver Parker offers us a more than interesting thriller, with continuous references to the classic film noir, that keeps the viewer's attention until the last breath. In a story whose protagonist is Orson Welles, find the ideal actor to embody the genius always is a headache. Danny Huston, who knew the own Welles for friendship with his father John Huston made a bright, full of shades covering a wide emotional range, and interpretation without falling into the overacting or the grotesque. The rest of the cast components perform to high level, including peace Vega, whose international career looks every day stronger thanks to good performances like this.In short, fade to black is a thriller intelligent and honest, because it offers what it promises, that maintain intrigued the espetador from the first minute until its conclusion. It's a kind of cinema, pure entertainment, which is scarce today, or at least do the good examples of the genre. And it is ironic that a good mystery with Orson Welles starring movie has been done in the United Kingdom and not the Almighty Hollywood.
2,352
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/625
José A. Peig
El laberinto del fauno
2
5
muchocine
Toro is it mounted very well that a legion of unwary positively valued his film, but El Laberinto del Fauno is nothing more than a movie that he dreams of being a work of art.
In the exercise of film criticism there is a base difficulty: as regards the artistic value of a particular aesthetic translation, or an idea of the story, the story or concept to develop. That value depends on one hand on the sensitivity and the subjective scales of each individual and, on the other, of the consideration to be of the different theoretical currents concerning the philosophy of aesthetics and the narrative structure.If something should highlight the film by Guillermo del Toro, according to critics - quite favourable - which have been published in recent days, was by visual imagery and a lyrical sense of charming with sinister overtones. However, for a server, the only scene from the film with its own entity which is represented in the frame that opens the comment today, grisly oneiric Moor starring a creature that even in my worst nightmares I could even guess, eyes in the hands that make prey to a fairy of metal are devoured by the creature with a remarkable burden of bad milk and sense of the grotesque. Apart from this passage, which I explain - depending on ways to assess an aesthetic product - what kind of visual imagery manifests itself in labyrinth, the labyrinth, the grim aesthetic of an enchanted forest or metal amantis. In particular, in that stratum of the film, creativity is null. To explain me it.Del Toro in the entirety, you offer us a story - quite trite - about violence and the tribulations of the Spanish post-war, supported within a fantasy child, wrapped up on the girl child protagonist, which aims to combat the misfortune by resorting to the magic of his fantasy. Therefore, we have a story that combines fantasy and reality. The conclusion is quite illustrative of the intention of its author; in the tragic denouement, the last moments of the agony originating the last fantasy that become heroin to his protagonist. But that just prior to the last breath. In the end only death in the stark reality.I.e., del Toro is it mounted very well that a legion of unwary positively valued his film with formulas of the type "is a wonderful sinister fairy tale that beats from the underworld of a sinister reality" and the like that you can read these days. Indeed, shows us what an underworld inhabited by fantastic creatures that exist only in the imagination, but the problem is the lack of a connection between the fantastic facts and the facts, and the result is a disjointed film in this clear mixture even for the more profane. On the one hand tells us a story about the fantasies of a girl and on the other a story violent in the social and political reality of that historic moment. Lacks it a structure that articulates this whole. It was the only way to achieve an aesthetic and narrativamente laudable product (singular, worthwhile, as you prefer), that each of the two stories, separately, contribute little or nothing. Only at the end, when the girl dies in reality and was proclaimed in the fantasy heroine, is some light in this regard, despite the paleness of the set.Worst of all is the abuse of clichés and commonplaces: the fascist military (character, my God what grotesque), the pregnant woman and victim, revolutionaries hiding in the forest, the traitor. The realization of this rural drama in the post-war period, both script and visual representation plays with bases and elements too old; Let's be honest, there is no difference between the implementation of del Toro and which would give any movie or series Spanish that you address the same subject matter: there is a single frame or sequence of the Assembly to emerge no genuine meaning to show that there is an author behind the camera. And that is what find me unforgivable: "El laberinto del fauno" is intended to be a film original, lyrical and I do not know what more, and all you have is conventionalism and clichés insubstantial.The icing puts her free use of violence and sadism: what role exerts the blood and the detailed (exaggerated) description of acts of violence in the overall hue of the history? Apart from being of dubious taste, it is unnecessary: it is one thing to show violence in a sad, raw and violent history and other morbid and cheap exhibitionism. What where is the difference?. Compare with Sam Peckinpah and the matter will become quite clear.In the end, they had told me that this film was a work of art, but it is nothing more than a movie that he dreams of being a work of art.
2,353
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/975
Francisco Bellón
Mia Sarah
4
5
muchocine
MIA Sarah is a tender story and sweet, that at no time falls in the easy or the acaramelamiento cheap. This mixture should add the originality of the proposal and its development, intelligent humor, and a touch of magic that makes the tape in a modern fable, a romantic fable.
In the film, as in all the arts, could be argued that you're all invented, or at least almost everything is governed by unchanged rules that leave little to the imagination of everyone. There are some film genres which seem at first glance a nightmare for originality, which do something different and new seems to be punishable. The romantic comedy is one of those genera whose exponents today appear to be photocopies of photocopies. Perhaps for this reason, the romantic comedy as we know it is not one of the most exploited genera in recent Spanish cinematography, by limitations that offers. There are always some exceptions, and Mia Sarah, newcomer Gustavo Ron, is one of them. Marina (Verónica Sánchez) is a young girl that brings caring to his brother Samuel (Manuel Lozano) and his grandfather Paul (Fernando Fernán Gómez) since the death of their parents three years ago. Since then, Samuel suffers from agoraphobia, and has not taken to the streets. Provided that Marina Gets a new psychologist to visit his brother, this manages to frighten him. Everything changes when appears Gabriel (Daniel Guzmán), the new psychologist Samuel. From the premise of a romantic comedy, Gustavo Ron makes a beautiful and cheerful, film that is overflowing with good intentions. It is a sweet, and tender story that never falls on how easy or the acaramelamiento cheap. This mixture should add the originality of the proposal and its development, intelligent humor, and a touch of magic that makes the tape in a modern fable, a romantic fable. To maintain the illusion, the film relies on its actors, especially on a masterful Fernán Gómez, as always, and a sweet and adorable Verónica Sánchez. MIA Sarah is not never heavy, but is seen with a smile on the lips from the beginning until the end, and is of those films that comes out happy, that you comfort to one spirit. Unfortunately, by the time that opens, and pos low distribution, few will be viewers who enjoy the first small jewel of the Spanish film of the season coming.
2,354
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4146
Francisco Bellón
Mortadelo y Filemón: Misión Salvar la Tierra
1
5
muchocine
The new film adventure of Mortadelo and Filemón will go down in history not only by the great box office that can be done, but for being one of the worst films of the Spanish film in decades.
Many of us believe that good commercial cinema is in danger of extinction, such as the Iberian lynx, and give with a decent film that appeals to the masses is very complicated. One of the more memorable cases in the Spanish film is La Gran Aventura de Mortadelo y Filemón, in which Javier Fesser was able to collect and convey the essence of the characters of Ibáñez, his humor and his surrealist point.So good and funny memories contrast with the feeling of anguish and despair which leads to any lover of cinema second Mortadelo y Filemón RAID on the big screen. And is that having a reference so clear, the question that nobody manages to answer is why Miguel Bardem has done it so badly wrong? In its effort to copy the style of Fesser, Bardem has passed three villages, and what they previously were small and subtle details of the surreal world of Ibáñez, have now become grotesque imitation that populate each frame. The spirit of the characters is trampled and denigrated to unimaginable extremes. The humor of Fesser, simple and great ingenuity disappears at the same time here by complete for a set of bad jokes and gags in a bad taste, allowing that Yes the showcasing of its two protagonists téorico. And it is that there are sequences created with the sole purpose of providing an excuse for the display of Eduard Soto (real catastrophe burricalva) or Pepe Viyuela. But not fearful and dear reader, there are still more, and that if there were not enough the pathetic spectacle that is the film from start to finish, Bardem dares with a couple of winks moviegoers. Certainly Billy Wilder must be now turning in his grave by so horrible desecration.The new film adventure of Mortadelo and Filemón will go down in history not only by the great box office that can be done, but for being one of the worst films of the Spanish film in decades. And it is that on the 50th anniversary of these endearing characters, not be could have devised a worst celebration. Poor Ibáñez should be pulling their hair, of the few remaining clear.
2,355
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1227
Jesus Lens
Banderas de nuestros padres
3
5
muchocine
Do we left somewhat disappointed because, honestly, we expected more from Clint, the last classic of the American cinema, whose?Letters from Iwo Jima? already look forward, in the confidence that, this time Yes, will the true measure of what he is capable.
Reasons why "Flags of our fathers" is over disappointing us George and me, still a good movie, and on the basis that we were loaded with enthusiasm, desire and good vibración:primero.-because it is not what we had promised. And it is that long time, are telling us that this was the film about what happened on Iwo Jima. And that, later, Clint Eastwood we would tell the same story, only from the Japanese point of view. And this is not the case. Because in "Flags of our fathers", Iwo Jima is not but the scenario, the Mc Guffin, which would read Hitchcock, that serves as a starting point to tell another story, that really is the famous photo of soldiers raising the American flag and, above all, the return home of heroes, converted into cracks mediaused by the Government to raise funds to sustain the efforts of war.Second.-because the film is dispersed in various plot threads.And, therefore, the film does not have the hotplate, solvency and soundness of "Mystic river", "M$ B" or "without forgiveness", for example. On the one hand, we have the memories of war, excellently filmed, as it was presumably with a director of the Office of Clint, drinking directly from the style of Spielberg in his "saving private Ryan", passed through the sieve of scorched picture of "Jarhead".On the other hand we have the episode of the uprising of the flag, photography, etc. Thirdly, the media of the case, the relationship of the three survivors who returned home converted into heroes by the Department of State and its tour across the country collecting money. And, finally, the rest of the lives of three characters, family relations, their successes and, mostly, their vital failures.Third.-By the characters.Sincerely, Clint and his great writer could have been with the character of the serve, which is the best example of what the film wants to transmit. A guy running, much to his regret, he become hero and since as a model of a thousand different ideals, when he just wanted to be an anonymous type. And all the self-destructive impulse that accompanies him. The other two characters are more tasteless and sincerely, reach a little bored. Or, when you leave less, completely indifferent.Fourth.-because of the confusion of intentions (and hence, results) do they wanted an anti-war film, which lend pests on the war? They wanted a film that denounced this society of the image in which we live? They wanted a film to speak on the use that makes the power of citizens when they are useful for then forget about them and leave them in the lurch? Of all this there in "Flags of our fathers", but none of it is well resolved.Having said which, Jorge and I left both cold of cinema, still knowingly and in the conviction that we had seen a good movie, with ex officio and master sequences. We left somewhat disappointed because, honestly, we expected more from Clint, the last classic of the American cinema, whose "letters from Iwo Jima" already look forward, in the confidence that, this time Yes, will the true measure of what he is capable. In other words, another masterpiece undeniable. We were cited.
2,356
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/914
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Primera plana
5
5
muchocine
Wilder proverbially emphasizes the corruption of power. Front page lives in freedom, writes in freedom and is filmed without the homicidal corset of the censorship of the time filters...
Somehow, front page, very precariously summary, is a film by Billy Wilder, and she come together, also very schematically raised, the leivmotivs of the author, his particular interests in film, his way of seeing life. So front page contains formidable sentences, irony, sarcasm, bad milk good (not coarse, not cazurra), vertiginous dialogues, characters with a dramatic depth and a comic bis dozing spectators-proof.Wilder cinema is cinema of words, cinema in love with dialogue as an absolute asset to hook to leave that they steal two hours of attention to attend a story that happens to other people. What is the film, but this?The Wilder words pronounced them morons psychiatrists, corrupt sheriffs, journalists hacks of shoddy, mayors sponsored by a brand of sausages and poor of spirit that do not support more or less irremediable injustice in this world, but also the Wilder words are spoken by whores (ex officio that never leaves badly in the film of the Austrian master), journalists as a sequoia Cup, clerks with a cathedral heart and poor of spirit that they go away the shit of life and draw the nose to find on-air flawed by the stench, a point of honesty, aromas and beauty.Unlike the film of Howard Hawks that gives rise to this (new moon, 1940), front page lives in freedom, to write in freedom and is filmed without the homicidal corset of filters of the censorship of the time. Wilder proverbially emphasizes the corruption of power.Hawks makes a more dynamic film: Wilder, in the 1970s, forty years later, signs a more finely ironic work, with a draught of comedy more virulent because Wilder humor hurt when he hears concentrated. It is a caustic humor: acid and corrosive humor.Whatever that Wilder was a journalist in his early Vienna years, knows what will the thing and front page, the thread of this sort of lived event, becomes a monument formidable freedom of expression, the nobility of the art of journalism and their dignity as essential in the last trade (at least) two centurieswithout which runs.The argument itself is a satire thorough, methodical in its simplicity, but strong in the extension of field reaches. Walter Burns (Walter Matthau) is the editor of a newspaper of double circulation and abundant, but low in talent template because, apparently, will have to resort to his journalist star Hildy Johnson (Jack Lemmon) to cover the execution of a murderer in the local presidio. Everything is mess when Johnson announces, theatrically, with a clearly contemporary and intelligent comedy which abandons the work by marrying a Philadelphia concert and make a living as a publicist. You ranting against journalism, it is important that the press only read for awhile and the newspaper ends as wrapper of a few scrapes of herring in a dustbin. Walter Burns is, by all possible means, devious almost all, recover their man for the news, return it to the Office, avoid that he marry, mostly. Here we note the conventional script, the commercial, avenible party to the conventions and the usual gags, but below, ras of metaphor, late (powerful, sublime) desparpajo that Wilder portrays the role of the journalist as a notary of the reality, thus also very manidamente expressed.Much of what we see only happening in the Department of the presidio press. From his window, he then rotates, is the scaffold. Journalists there to drink, play cards and talk about frivolities and old raids have no scruples, not have honesty, have no difficulty in modifying the reality to your tastes and for the greater glory of the pompous and bombastic holder: seller.The Mayor and the sheriff are neglected and are a huge asset in the script of Diamond and the own Wilder, on a small play of Hetch. The two are degraded, converted to slag which measures (as you can) to the powerful Guild of the press (the serious, that is) so not aireen their desire, their sins legally punishable.Then there is the Eggelhoffer, the psychiatrist to interview the defendant Williams: one of the best side of Wilder, no margin of doubt. Rich in its profile caricatured, reduced to hyperbolic shadowing of Freud, which Wilder also ridicules. "Has the own Freud met the Wilder journalist in his native Vienna and that they were, shall we say, good tune.""Truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth", reads the slogan of the Examiner, the newspaper of yore. Movies and nothing but movies, I'd say. God, in voice of Trueba, was killed by modern cinema, the cinema less semantic, film eaten by technology fever.In the sky in which I do not think will be taking notes on the turbiedades of los Angeles. Bad times for the lyric, sang in the glorious eighties low blows.
2,357
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/291
Rafa Ferrer
La sombra de la sospecha
3
5
muchocine
Although the film, one of many, has its touches of genius, know us to a tale that already have told us many times.
Well, I wanted to see the return of Michael Douglas (accompanied by a stunning cast) to the big screen, the penalty is that this kind of political thrillers we see them from time to time on screen, and to the predictability of the argument and development, one has to take some imagination and good roll to be able to digest.And is that his hour and 40 min. Skinny footage please do the film, with a rather abrupt ending, which attempts to solve the plots that have been opening doors during the movie, true is that Clark Johnson, who as Shyamalan always appears in his films, composes one of those movies that are profitable for the study, both actors (just for the box office)(, on DVD and the projection television, recovers more than invested) and although the film, one of many, has its touches of genius, know us a story that already have told us many times.Incidentally, Douglas arrives to remind Eastwood in "In the line of fire" and is there certain ages that is little credible the role of bodyguard, much better Kiefer Sutherland (repeating a role similar to the "24" series), as well as the debut of Eva Longoria (the bride of the basis of the Spurs, Tony Parker), on screen, making a hole to the most famous Hispanic of the Mecca of cinema; separate mention Kim Bassinger who is no longer a girl, but still shows that feelling of yesteryear.Anyway, the movie is interesting, the penalty is to know "already sucked caramel".
2,358
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1253
Yojimbo
En la cuerda floja
3
5
muchocine
Not all biopics are equal. The Office of James Mangold is outstanding and manages to not only hit with Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon, but go a little beyond the anecdotal.
Not all biopics are equal. We can fear be moralina and narrate the typical twilight of a star, normally in drugs or several vices that then there is something, usually the love and support of someone who redeems all the evil done, both to yourself and to others.This film also goes that. However the Office of James Mangold is outstanding and get not only hit with Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon, but also manages to go a little beyond the anecdotal, such as do country music, to focus on a life with certain trauma, which could well be the any, and how you can mix in a bad way with a change of habits such as sudden stardom.Another point in favor of this film is that it reflects not only the character of a character, but it also preaches rightly that no matter much dexterity interpretative if known exploit in your favor. And also more merit has if a style you create with this step.Another of the successes is the choice and direction of actors, both in recent Golden Globe award-winning. The interpretative duel has ups and downs, but low-lying areas are very high. There are initial moments in which the character of Cash is child, without too many features (at least from what I knew to this singer) recognizable. Then appears Reese Witherspoon (June Carter) and literally overshadows the screen to Phoenix, having between the two impressive chemistry. But then the decline of Cash is masterfully played and represents the definitive consecration of the evil Comodo as King of the movie. Special mention to Robert Patrick as the despotic father of Cash: this will be his year, I do not know why I get to my.Perhaps err on the side of corny, but it contains exciting moments such as the treatment of the family of Carter cash that a camel is closer to your home, or a declaration of marriage of the more predictable but musically moving.I'll stick with the good memory of the boot, with the music contained in the prison walls of Folsom, that at first I thought the Hall of to the side, but which were to be the drums of war in a battle to right-handers soldiers armed with a guitar and great country.
2,359
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4271
Bloody Will
Juno
5
5
muchocine
Ideal characters, a round script and a plot that connects.
It is amazing how the simplest ideas end up being the most endearing films. As if it were already a tradition, every year we have veered away from the main prizes for the powerful hipermillonarias productions for the independent film industry. I remember that when 'Pulp Fiction' entered the nominations 14 years ago something made me frown. Now, the absence of a tape as 'Juno' could be considered a crime.Coup of heart and much dialogue, 'Juno' stands as the perfect this year, and no comedy because it makes you have you in the seat or saucy jokes are more clever. This synchronized combination of ideal characters, a round script and a plot that connects is far superior to a sound of laughter.There are two stars in this film, and that you be no doubt. The first is Ellen Page, whose performance is virtually of outstanding , but the other Star comes out on-screen and is everything. Diablo Cody, the new sense among the writers, has drawn a world so round as closed, that of Juno, a young irreverent, maleducada, know-it-all but whose positivity connects it to the first with the Viewer. This debut earned him a nomination for the Oscars, and what you want to tell you: more than deserved.Juno (Page), a 16 year old girl passionate about rock discovers that she is pregnant with a boy that does not even have a stable relationship (Michael Cera). After announcing the news to his father (J.K. Simmons), Juno decides to give his son to a newly married couple with an enviable environment (Jason Bateman and Jennifer Garner), which retain a somewhat special relationship .Stating that I think the comparisons are odious, but Juno is the teen version of what was his rookie season Veronica Mars. The girl is a real verbal submachine gun that has answer for absolutely everything, and the irony is much of the conversation. I don't know if there is someone aged 16 with so much maturity and personality out of series, but these qualities, which can lead to rejection of who sees it, has an unexpected result, and that is a profound complicity with the protagonist of unusual situation.Why not seem a boldness that says that the direction from Jason Reitman is basically circumstantial. I'm not saying that it is bad, is that simply it sticks flat to level in the excellent script for Cody, and think that not is has separate much of the way this has been checked. With a profusion of flat media and a technique more than acceptable did not lack that Reitman, should set itself too many frills for the film secured its place among the best. I repeat endlessly: the script is everything.Those that are unpayable are the cast of actors of the film, which seem to live the moment of their careers. Ellen Page went on tiptoe by ' X-Men 3 , and would come 'Hard Candy' to show that the girl is someone to take into account in coming years. In 'Juno' Page is just out. I guess to screenwriter and actress sharing nights in white and some that another Cup (the girl is already 21 years old) because the symbiosis between the two is impressive. His performance is paramount to wanting to Juno, and that the character commits more than reprehensible actions for some.The rest of side appear shortly, but good. J.K. Simmons is the compressive father of Juno, and tenderness between both players passed on the screen. Jason Bateman, very frequent to comedies holds the type, but Jennifer Garner is in the role of Vanessa Loring one of the best of his career. Not only end up loving Juno, is that above all the happiness in the world you want a character that could to be unfriendly. Michael Cera outboard what better do: be a lovable pringao.If home contaramos the decisions of Juno without knowing her, the character would be negligible. With simplicity, cotidaneidad and emotion with which Diablo Cody tells the story of Juno, it is impossible not to love. Perhaps some see a message with moralina USA in history, but for me goes unnoticed that I absorbed completely the protagonist. With a soundtrack lame ** da, 'Juno' is one of those few films that should be seen in this era pre-Oscars, when we know who is and who does not.If in the adjoining room shooting out of the submachine gun of tite Stallone, in this, the bullets go direct to the heart and the head.
2,360
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2533
Alvaro Oliva
28 semanas después
4
5
muchocine
This sequel will delight fans to the genre and all those who want to see a proposal interesting and consistent with what it purports to.
Juan Carlos Fresnadillo returns to theaters and manages to leave through the front door. If already with his short film "Handcuffed" was released, and later with "Unbroken" showed what was able, with "28 weeks later" gives us a sequel that could well be included in the select club of "second parties better than the first".The argument is simple, and tells us the situation in London twenty-eight weeks after the outbreak of "Wrath" that ravaged among the population, and who saw in "28 days later". With a start of film frantic, fast and harrowing, Fresnadillo puts us in the shoes of Don (Robert Carlyle), and how he lived the outbreak and had to leave behind.This boot show us some images very stunning and with great force, as the race that has to give Don the Plains, as hundreds of zombies Chase you. Subsequently already is presents the current situation to the other characters and we are living the events unleashed after the new outbreak.Leaving aside the potential readings on the situation that happens in England, and the problems that arise in families, Governments and other moral dilemmas, Fresnadillo opts for showing us a very fast film, which abounds on the camera in movement and the grain in the images, giving a close touch at times.Another virtue is the use of the subjective camera that puts us in the vision of players, especially in the scene in which women and children fall down the stairs of the subway, totally in the dark and only serving to see infrared of the weapon being the peephole. At that time it reminded me to "The Blair Witch Project", tape that achieved a realism and anguish rarely achieved previously.The script and story flojean in some situations, but Fresnadillo manages to save without the film suffer excessively.The absence of people, crowds, decisions of senior and snipers, the trip by a desert London aboard a moped or the carnage of the helicopter, are some of the sequences that make up "28 weeks later", and that make the zombie theme to continue its resurgence after recent good proposals that we have been finding.This sequel will delight fans to the genre and all those who want to see a proposal interesting and consistent with what it purports to.
2,361
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1177
Emilio Calvo de Mora
El ejército de las tinieblas
3
5
muchocine
You have to see the army of darkness because it is dignified, fun, solid and noble if you know to contextualize the film in a necessarily paracinematográfico order, mestizo, outside standards.
Founded on the prolific series B or Z of Italian gore and humorous sci-fi Martian of the early 1950s in the United States, the army of darkness exercises of hinge between the visual aversion of the first (entrails, blood, mutilation) and domestic, tacky and cheap romanticism of the second (with its narrative imagination, with its neighborhood morning film marketing).Raimi obvious seriousness which then exhibited in Spider-man (1, 2 and 3, now assume) or Darkman, to take two examples pleasant for this chronicler, to give us a ration of terror to the monthly Python with gags worthy of a good Mel Brooks. And get out this collage of elements Crystal decent ends plagiarizing himself (ole) and doing fine chacota of his infernal possession (highly recommended if you want to see quality disgusting horror film) or the aforementioned Darkman is evasion, comic rupture and, above all, do not forget, box, ring, ring.Bruce Campbell is the actor fetish of Raimi and squeezes it wonderfully in this film. Well stuck in the role of Ash (ASH), the journey of the time ends in the middle ages and should assume a role heroic, prophetic, which redeem the inhabitants of the Castle and, at the time, to himself. There is no deep psychology of characters or paper-thin paths of the morals of the time. There are no characters. There is no time.Steal the Necronomicon, the book of evil attributed by Lovecraft to an apocryphal Arabic got Faust, above the resistance to an army of skeletons: for that matter. Skeletons? Yes, jaws, coccyx, shoulder blades, femurs dancing as in the Thriller by Michael Jackson in a great tribute to the classic Haskin, Jason and the ARgonautas.Yo I enjoyed it very much in this magnificent scene that already worth seeing the film, but there are more: there is a playful tribute to the cinema medievalist of Cape, sword and torreón, injecting modernity: pouring a point of modest bombast that warnsespecially in the first twenty or thirty minutes. Then the film decays, but that already knew.Merit is the two seemingly disparate, non juntables genera mescolanza: era film (the medieval, of course) and cuasigore terror without that any loss of substance.You have to see the army of darkness because it is dignified, easily arrumbable to the receiver of the moments lost in a room, in this case an ear Chair of House, but fun, solid and noble if you know to contextualize the film in a necessarily paracinematográfico, mestizo, order out of standards.
2,362
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2181
Pruden Rodríguez
Tideland
4
5
muchocine
With this movie you must relax, sit in front of the screen and let you carry. If you put any specific expectation on it, it is possible that you do not see accomplished.
Terry Gilliam said in the press conference that his wife had said a few words about Tideland which he had liked much: "with this film you must relax, sit in front of the screen and let you carry." "If you put any specific expectation on it, it is possible that you do not see accomplished." This kind of definition is perhaps ambiguous, but it is also the sense with that one can get out of the room. Personally, I I I debated between "just good" or "fucking good", but I understand that more than one would be between "just good" or "fucking shit". In fact, Terry already doing this game since always. One of its objectives is to provoke, do think. All his works he prints a very personal touch, a special magic that have few Directors today. And if ever it is flat, or excessively commercial, is because runout is taking to make the kind of films he likes. This is one of them. Like or not, will perform twisting of disgust or not, laugh or not, he will cry or not, but he has achieved what he wanted: that people react.Is it has described as a genre film, but I could not tell why. I guess it has an air of fantasy film, but it could well be a black comedy or a drama, adventure film, or a mixture of all. Tideland tells the story of Jeliza-Rose, a 9 year old girl who lives in a completely dysfunctional family. Accustomed to living in unfavourable conditions (his father has to prepare each night a shot of heroin, his mother can call you "slut" and "affection" in the same sentence, etc.), Jeliza-Rose has developed a great deal of imagination and easily evades the reality with the help of her four best friends (cutthroat dolls). The sudden death of his mother takes him to travel with his father to a lost House of Texas (grandmother's inheritance) and there begins a new phase of his life, where anything is possible (squirrels talking submarines in the middle of a meadow). Will hand in hand with its neighbours Dickens (a child with mental retardation) and his sister Dell (a spinster eccentric) find new possibilities for their incredible mundo.¿Y how is the world of Jeliza-Rose? It is hard to describe, but has something of Alicia in the country of the wonders and some fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. Never get to be a history intimate and full of adventures as the Alice, but not get to be as wacky as fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and scatological. Everything has a surreal air, but in the end nothing is as magical as it seems. If you press me also has an air to life is beautiful. The reality is that Jeliza-Rose lived the end of his family, the final decay, and that fate puts it in the hands of a family equal or worse. And, however, she finds adventure and new reasons for happiness where no adult could see them. Terry does is get in your skin. And the best thing is not to escape, not wanting to see it from outside. Then we consider if it was very hard, if it was fun or if it was empty.Aside from the story, deserve a special mention the excellent photography, aesthetics, completely adapted to the story, and the masterly interpretation of the girl child, Jodelle Ferland (also include Jeff Bridges in the role of father and Brendan Fletcher as Dickens).
2,363
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2613
Tyler
Planet Terror
5
5
muchocine
A way of seeing the film that we have never seen, a way to feel at one time through our. A way of discovering a filmmaker that promises things that makes.
Because there is no possibility of more stars, that if not, left no place to write and only satellite wonderful ponia brilliant this film Cine.El Maestrísima work may not be an art, or can, but which does have to think that what he does he is not; You should carefully consider the film in terms of handicrafts, Robert Rodriguez movie is therefore a genuine enjoyment, a tape so fun as violent and brazen. The move happened with GRINDHOUSE and its European Premiere, we all know that move to separate it into two to get more money from a movie designed to be a double continuous session. That is a mistake, because it not only movie is a tribute (and in it I will talk about later) to a certain type of film, is also a tribute to a way of looking at it.Much has been said of Robert Rodriguez (and God TARANTINO) are large "homenajeadores", which is not true. them not homage, they steal. they are thieves of celluloid, ideas and material, which occasionally recycled and sometimes simply copied and stick (Tarantino always, incidentally, with a lot more success than Rodriguez). This may be the only "movie tribute" Tarantino and Rodriguez. But let us focus on Rodriguez this time, is the time.There are people that has not seen the film that is exhibia in the GRINDHOUSES, but sure not many have seen and do not remember or do not know. The Weinstein say the movie have separated in two by the reason that Europeans do not know what that way of seeing movies, a real bullshit, my father (great movie buff in his juvetud years ago) saw movies in continuous session double "convois" or adventures and "cates", in late 1950s and 1960s. Authentic double sessions, which had rolls screwed by the use, rotten rooms in which people meaba and movies, to go in several rolls, is they saw in a disorderly way because to the projectionist is you had gone hand in hand with alcohol last night and placed them in the order were not, I remember that my mother (this time she) told me that once saw giant way messy in a summer cinema. What I am here to say with this calving esque sartada the reasons for the producers always are hidden, which we should import relatively little to the public, but to the "geeks" as I we like to know.The Spaniards know perfectly this way to see movies, our generation, the mia, which today are between 20 and 25 have not seen shit, and 40 not the truth, but earlier if. What is truth esque gender who saw Rodriguez and Tarantino, did not have much to do with us, they are the film of the 1970s.. the movies gore, the vampires and zombies, the spaghetti western instead of classic westerns. but the way of seeing them was the same, with lost rolls and like dirt.PLANET TERROR (Finally I am a bit specific!) is a movie with a devilish pace. It pays tribute to and copy to the movies by Fulci, Bava (Lamberto and Mario) Fleischer film and the 70s and eighties slasher. Picks up a bit of everything and beautifully blends it to make a product, such as who makes a gazpacho of those with "tropezones", of those that do not pass at all. (comparison to possibly understand only the Andalusian)It is normal duration and of action and horror, in the purest style Rodriguez, shot at full speed and video. It has a magnificent cast with a cast of side perfect, thing that lately Rodriguez does better than anyone else, look at SIN CITY. Rodriguez also makes one thing only is towards the 50,60 and 70 and now he and his colleague Tarantino, who is repeating characters, in this case the Earl Mcgraw of Michael Parks, also seen in KILL BILL and open up the dawn, which produces an interesting temporary vortex. If Earl Mcgraw died in open up the dawn means that this movie happens after KILL BILL and PLANET TERROR, but in PLANET TERROR the character Bruce Willis (an actorazo that we recognize in years and to which the film owes a lot) talks about Bin Laden in a dialogue that I do not want to disclose. something really strange.PLANET TERROR was written before overcoming the dawn of the dead and 28 days later, it is can people creero not, but the truth is that it has nothing to do with them, this movie is not serious and takes very seriously.It is not a parody, but it is not a serious vision of the zombies, is a CINEMATIC vision, through the same cinema.The actors all have very well caught the tone. especially Josh Brolin and the subvaloradisimo and great Michael Biehn, I hope that now jump-start as it deserves. the Reese in TERMINATOR.If you want to have fun at the movies, which is for what is invented, you see it and rent movies type four minutes, which I'm not saying it is bad, but it is better to see something of the style of PLANET in the film.The movie is witty, full of winks that people will see. The machine gun of Rose Mcgowan in the leg. It is an image that will go down in the history of the cinema, matter what people say. If you see the movie, accepts a tone from the outset and if stays, no squeaks.It is difficult to maintain a tone and break it with something quite different and not chiirrie, only comes a title to the head, EL man QUE NUNCA ESTUVO there, which has the extrañísima output of tone of the UFO at the end... and is wonderful, perhaps because we are talking about people so perfect as the TERROR Coen.PLANET must see, with this trailer at the beginning of a movie that seems to be that it will be, but that is not made... MACHETE. Perhaps I spoke little specifically for the movie, but alomejor is better, because you have to see it.
2,364
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1187
Bloody Will
Apocalypto
4
5
muchocine
Apocalypto is one of the best films that has left the 2.006, and if you forget the mood of argue with its director, you are going to enjoy as it deserves.
Tremendous controversy I have with myself for this movie, so it would not surprise me that this time the suits were very unevenly distributed.I have not seen "The passion of the Christ", and believe that I will never do it. It is not for religious reasons, is that simply I it upset at the time that Gibson become phenomenon of marketing a film that nothing should have blockbuster. Even so, does not interest me his view of Christ's death and I have both right to avoid it as that refuses to see "Los Lizenz" of Pajares-Esteso. Why get "Virgin" to "Apocalypto", by how much this technique of "tell what gives me the win and as the win gives me" Gibson have met her in a film that seems to me perfect in cinematography but that touches the co ** by their constant improprieties.If you've been in Mexico you know that the most essential travel tour is the city of Chichen Itza, and that on their journey by bus will try a very nice guide to explain you in time record the history of the Mayan civilization. Mel Gibson has done the same thing that made my guide, but added violence, savagery, anguish and all cabreante end. Even so, there a minute of the film that makes me take off the eyes of the fantastic story the director tells me through the misfortunes of its protagonist, Jaguar, and that lasts 2 hours and 10, to me I spent flying.The argument I will tell you in a very simple way: Jaguar Paw. This is our hero and his life, and I do not advance absolutely anything of the argument because I have proven that the less you know more surprising is each lance of the film. That Yes, through the eyes of Jaguar are going to see a very small piece of a civilization and a culture, but also a massacre, a slavery and a way of life that (now comes the mess), Mel Gibson has shown in his peculiar style, and perhaps not the most correct.For this reason, we divide the concept of the film between film and historical correction. In the film, I have no buts no: solid script by its four flanks, continuous action without filling scenes, unknown actors that you submerge fully in a culture that looks more alive than ever, stunning natural scenery, impeccable costume recreations and last 40 minutes, which I will call "after the Jaguar" that I add to my favorites of for life. There are four key scenes on which rests the rest of the footage (village, crossing, city and escape) and they are so necessary that we cannot think that history be extended absurdly. All this is architect certainly Mel Gibson as director of film is demonstrating his technique goes upward? now, as historian, has won a sure beating.Here we go with the historical correction. I have no doubt at all that Gibson has not documented, moreover, it seems to me that it has soaked until exhaustion; However, this is as newspapers today: each tells the same story from the point of view that fits him best. Gibson blatantly seeks Kinky-violent factor than it is telling. Were the Mayans as Mr. Gibson has?; It is true that they made sacrifices, but the director not staged "a" sacrifice but a real orgy of cries, prayers, blood and mutilation, there is nothing. Although on the other hand, our hero is also Maya, and still our hero; Therefore, it is not the typical story of good and bad within a racial group?.That Gibson has gone through the Bullfighter the contributions made by the Mayans to their future, sure it is. Gibson portrays this culture as if they were the cannibals of "The hills have eyes", also; but keep in mind that Mel Gibson not owes nothing to this people, and has had his film as he feels. Let us remember that in "Mission Impossible II" we placed at the fallero next to a passage of Holy week. I know that it is not the same, but so can we explain that an American director does not have to be faithful to the maximum with a few ancestors who ultimately does not care nothing.Attention to the scene of the film gloriously. Source of anger for our Mexican friends. We can comment in the post and not so still deflate to anyone who wants to go to the cinema to see it. If I have to get me wet, me mojo: "Apocalypto" is one of the best films that has left the 2.006, and if you forget the mood of argue with its director, you are going to enjoy as it deserves.
2,365
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4134
José Córdoba
Los Crímenes de Oxford
2
5
muchocine
Having interesting notes in his mathematical dialogues, a good interpretation of John Hurt and a good Bill, cannot cover the expectations by the unrecognizable direction of Alex de la Iglesia and his screenplay that promises much more than what he gives.
The Oxford crimes involves the return of Alex de la Iglesia to the address after disappointing at the box office of their last two films 800 bullets and crime Ferpecto. His new film, clearly commissioned, shows that the director is able to renounce their identity signs and make a film away from his personal universe for good and for evil. The film tells us how after the arrival of a young mathematician at Oxford, a prestigious Professor to make his thesis director, death begins to make Act of presence to her around. A serial killer begins to pose a series of logical puzzles only student (Elijah Wood) and the Professor (John Hurt) seem to be able to resolve. The film clearly has a target commercial, no objection in this regard, is in fact a very decent film in that sense. Its duration (about 100 minutes) not weighs in the viewer and the mathematical burden of history is interesting, even though the director not it tries too hard to make it more attractive. Álex de la Iglesia, so committed work is surprising in this sense seems to evade his style the result is a film so impersonal that you could have led anyone. The address is so sterile that seems worthy of a movie of desktop, with the exception of a flat sequence well resolved, but out of place by its inconsistency with the rest of the film. Essentially dialogue film, Church solves almost all of the dialogues with the classic plano-contraplano, arriving tired by his insistence on the resource and the large number of scenes dialogadas between the character of the teacher portrayed by John Hurt and the student played by Elijah Wood. In this aspect the film was disappointing, while the Basque director leaves his mark on the character of a mathematical genius obsessed and prostrate forever in a hospital bed, only in this tortured personaje(interpretado_por_Alex_Cox) and, perhaps the daughter of the first victim of the serial killer (Julie Cox), seems to have left their record label director. The screenplay adaptation of the novel, the first thing that must be indicated is that it sins of literary. With a start too forced and incredible (what it says, by both the situation and characters), then begins to take flight despite the stereotypical characters, but is discursive, too many "intelligent" dialogues between mathematicians for a resolution so poor and force relations, here is unbelievable the relationship that arises between the characters of Leonor Watling and Elijah Wood. As regards interpretations, the result is irregular John Hurt is great as a teacher, in a role very grateful, everything must be said. Elijah Wood well hold the weight of the film, but unfortunately his chemistry with Leonor Watling is null. The latter in fact, because of its role whose unique sense seems the equip cargo sexual narrative based show Anatomy (especially her generous breasts), it is the weaker. Special mention to Julie Cox, a genuine robaescenas of first category. Elsewhere in sections the film is very correct from its cold photography to his artistic direction, passing by herrmanniana music by Roque Baños, with cameo included as conductor (how not!). In this sense the film proves its amplico budget with a very good invoice technique. In summary, the crimes of Oxford despite having interesting notes in his mathematical dialogues, a good interpretation of John Hurt and a good invoice, fails to meet expectations by the unrecognizable direction of Alex de la Iglesia and his screenplay that promises much more of what's on offer. A pity.
2,366
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1501
Tito Chinchan
El tercer hombre
5
5
muchocine
Great film of intrigue in the streets of a Vienna another thrown down by the second world war. One of the best films in the history of cinema, which continues to surprise with its intelligent and well spun argument. Highly recommended.
I think I'm going more than a steady pace. Anything of a physical impairment, given that every day I am more visible in that plane, neither of these trifles. What tells me that I get most is that I am starting to make collections of Sunday newspapers. Yes, I confess, I'm doing the collection of classic film that gives every Sunday newspaper that that clamp your pages. And at a good price, hear. By the way, the synopsis highlights until the last frame, so not leais.The film is about an American who travels to Vienna after World War II, when the city was divided into five parts, one per each occupying power and the last international. He travels to see an old friend, but get there discover who has died under mysterious circumstances. Total, that as he is a writer of novels of the West, believes that it is trained to investigate the alleged murder by your account so it faces to the army to do so.I loved this movie, and that films of Fame then I fail to kill. The setting is simply great, with that Vienna was genuinely quite crumbling. Very good actors, of those I like to me, with very marked gestures (especially the Duke or count, not remember well). The very remarkable script begins soft, with a kind of pirado that look to his dead friend, but grows until the final climax that exalts the film. Also, gives a little history lesson, that's always good. By the way, get Orson Welles in a very good role.In short, great film of intrigue in the streets of a Vienna another thrown down by the second world war. One of the best films in the history of cinema, which continues to surprise with its intelligent and well spun argument. Highly recommended.
2,367
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3795
Ana Belén Pacheco
Los Cien Pasos
4
5
muchocine
I Cento Passi is almost a political pamphlet and a declaration of intent mixed with a reality of Italian culture that still nowadays seek to fight.
I Cento Passi reflects the Sicilian idiosyncrasy. If think that the regions in Spain have marked differences go to Italy is a parallel world. The first thing that comes to mind when we say Sicily is "mafia" as to not disappoint us this story it has their dose of mafia, the Communists and their opposing ideologies. It is another worthy work of political and historical film narrated once more similarly to the view in other recent tapes as "My brother is only son", children, young and idealistic. Peppino Impastato at young age realizes that political thoughts and the fighting of their elders have a direct impact in the society that surrounds him. The death of his uncle takes him to meet the Communist ideas of a painter to mark his future. Already an adult in the 1970s being Communist and convinced activist founded publications and a radio as a main vehicle for propaganda. Lives in Cinisi, a small town in the province of Palermo, known for the airport of Punta Raisi is in their vicinity and the powerful local mafia bosses use to their businesses. The hundred steps referred to in its title are separating his house of Tano Badalamenti. The greater the area boss and with which his family retains good relations based on silence and consent. Peppino with your revolutionary ideas and their way of making them public will get not only disturb the Mafiosi local if not to endanger his family and himself when finally decides to run in the election by Democrazia Proletaria.Los facts of the're film based on a true story and once again the death of Aldo Moro will mark the fate of the main characters of the same. It would be lying if not that of all Italian films on the subject is recognized that perhaps more extreme is shown and that as a result its effectiveness decreases. While others worry of finding a point means to express political concerns of its protagonists I Cento Passi take the figure of Giuseppe (Peppino is if diminutive in Italian) and her extols both their successes and their mistakes. Not to blame this weakness to director, writers or actors that for better or for worse in the late 1970s Italy were so raw and pronounced.I Cento Passi is almost a political pamphlet and a declaration of intent mixed with a reality of Italian culture that still nowadays seek to fight. While we conceive the mafia as her showed us American filmmakers in the country of the boot is something markedly different. Gangs are nothing more than families that little by little they have accumulated money from the time where nobody had neither to eat and have finally opted to keep his empire with the same methods of yesteryear while maintaining the smuggling and illegal to protect loved ones. I Cento Passi is the idea of Mafia as family, as protection and as a way of life in few tapes. For that reason alone already worth the viewing of their hundred fourteen minutes.Its judgement on the contrary is support from the middle of the tape in his political thinking stagnating to their characters and storytelling.
2,368
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3487
Jack Torrance
Rec
3
5
muchocine
From some time the film oscillates between the terrifying, the boring or the ridiculous. Even so, the show offers plenty of scares and moments of impact to ensure an hour and a half from entertainment.
The project of the Witch of Blair (The Blair Witch Project, 1999), was a kind of reagent for the 1990s horror film. Emerged a decade full of light and aimed at the teen public movies, mockumentary of Myrick and Sanchez continued the wake of the tremendous Holocaust Cannibal (Cannibal Holocaust, 1980) and made use of a new film weapon: internet viral marketing, or how a minimum budget film can become Gold thanks to Word of mouth. Their insane success at the box office, the film itself was boring and terrifying in equal parts and their supposed Postmodernism not let place to the development of an effective script for the benefit of the likelihood. After the financial resurrection of the genre and the current time of remakes of horror, that film begins little by little to notice his influence in the genre of horror. After a hiatus of almost a decade we have movies as the announced Cloverfield (2008) by j. j. Abrahams, that mixes the attacks of monsters Godzilla type with first-person point of view. The zombie subgenre returns with three inputs: the diary of the dead (Diary of the Dead, 2007) by George Romero, The Zombie Diaries (2007) and the Spanish [REC] (2007). Romero tape uses subjective circumstantial form format, only to provoke immediacy, not neglected in no time the classical film quality and proposes an elaborate script that leaves site to total verisimilitude. [REC], however, proposes a trip purely focused on the realism through the television format of reality television programmes. As if it were a witch's train, [REC] is nothing more than an honest película-experiencia which takes full BWP style to have, in their own way, how to survive a zombie infection to the 28 days later (28 Days Later, 2002). Far from being a nightmare of unsustainable horror, the tape turns out to be a rather commercial work, as moments of tontorrón and light humor, and that continues to be a fairly common film of "scares". Its objective of seeking the ultrarrealismo formidable begins with the presentation of the main character, beautifully played by Manuela Velasco. His naturalness before the camera is ideal and paler performances seen in this country in a long time. Unfortunately, the amazing work of actors (such as the elderly couple) is invalidated by little credible interpretations of many, too many, cast members. For this reason, part of the original premise is invalidated and from certain point the film oscillates between the terrifying, the boring or the ridiculous. Even so, the show offers plenty of scares and moments of impact to ensure an hour and a half from entertainment. One of the problems it shares with the Blair Witch Project is its lack of a prepared script. There are several more or less improvised dialogues and many moments of shouting, chaos and confusion which, under the excuse of realism, reveal a lack of ideas written on paper. The lack of a purpose is supplied based on good planning and virtuosity in the Mise en scène, always credible and well done. Another drawback, perhaps unrelated to the product itself, is that it is far from its real possibilities. The film seems to boot, but does not really even the last section of the film, when the protagonists have to face the dangers in order to escape. The mcguffin of the search for a key in one of the upper floors seem to have been discovered too late and so far there are several sequences of narrative stagnation and turns to the same place that makes that they are not used effectively mechanisms of the subgenre of horror. So, the journey never becomes an intense experience from beginning to end. In this regard, worth mention the previous Balagueró film to enter to live (2005) as an exploration much more accurate of the possibilities offered by scenarios such as a block of apartments, or the long corridors of an apartment engulfed in darkness. Therefore, [REC] disappointed in his use of explored space and the artifices of horror first-person, insufficient resulting in more compact and less successful than the previous work of one of its directors. The end, uneasy, it is one of the more chilling moments of the film, and although so far the film means a move away from the ghosts and sects typically Filmax, Plaza and Balagueró seem to not be able to get rid of characters with dark secrets and recovers at the last minute the (very common in the work of the second) cuts of newspaper, which on this occasion are little appropriategiving a farfetched, delusional and ridiculous explanation to the origin of the infection. Although it doesn't develop their full potential, the end product is a more than decent approach to the zombie revival, perhaps not placed one step ahead in the subgenus, but rather the opposite. There is a certain naivete in dealing with certain clichés of the genre, which are aided by the use of levels seen in recent successes of the living dead film. Thus, the use of a fat woman in nightdress or the level of one infected child, to which a character gets naive, to being bitten then are too symmetrical them in dawn of the dead (Dawn of the Dead, 2004) so that the tape not appears, nevertheless, true aroma to exploitation. And although there is nothing wrong in it, [REC] is a tape of very functional gender that is not intended to be more than that, a tape of opportunistic and commercial exploitation. The irregular career of Balagueró and Plaza consolidates with a perfectly enjoyable, easily consumable divertimento and that doesn't fool anyone. A good example of palomitero film posed an interesting conceptual opening for the fantastic homeland, which could well open a good trade gap in other subgenera to which we are accustomed to patriotic film makers dealing with horror.
2,369
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2519
JLO
Madagascar
2
5
muchocine
The problem through a script too bland - and that there are four writers-well that begins during the stay of the animals in the zoo and then stalls when the players made the landing on the dream island.
Something is happening at DreamWorks studios. From the great Shrek that continue down the level every year. Starting with Finding Nemo (which is quite good), passing through El Espanta sharks (forgettable), Shrek 2 (loose) until you reach this Madagascar, the point most low and that further pronounces the downfall of the study. Pixar relame.The characters are so endearing in any of the latest animation movies, voices are nice (is Sacha Baron Cohen) and up the lion bears a resemblance to the factions of the great comedian Ben Stiller. The problem through a script too bland - and that there are four writers-well that begins during the stay of the animals in the zoo and then stalls when the players made the landing on the dream island. And we are less than half of the film.The features are some good isolated gags that make a disjointed film at times, an animation close by movements to characters from the Warner and designed almost exclusively to children (that bad that we got used with Shrek!) But in the end not us so critical of a movie without intentions - apparently - transcend.The best are the anarchistic penguins led by a such Joe almost deserving of a film's protagonists. Happy to very little. The final moral is that if the Lion can not eat meat, we give fish and ready (while not to eat Nemo is all good).
2,370
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/586
Txapulin
Scoop
5
5
muchocine
After the risky but perfect Match Point, Allen returns to his comedy more classical in a seemingly simple movie, but so well made, nice and pleasant to see that it may end up being one of his best films.
Scoop can be translated as exclusive or scoop and is a word that applies to the world of journalism.In Woody Allen's new film, the scoop is revealed to a novice student of journalism (a Scarlett Johansson that personally reminds me Marilyn Monroe in one of their Candida and innocent interpretations) since a spectral appearance of the more beyond: a journalist recently died learns during his journey to the Otherworld (beautiful and dark image of the ship captained by death) that a ricachón London may be the perpetrator of a series of murders that occurred in the city and happens to give the exclusive to the young journalist. During its investigation, that will help a conjurer on tour (the same Woody Allen), the young will fall in love with the alleged murderer and the plot is served.Scoop connects directly with the superb murder mystery in Manhattan (1993) within the master Woody Allen filmography, especially by the mix of genres (comedy and intrigue police) and placing inexperienced characters to investigate murders. The novelty is that here the character of Allen, the magician Splendini, remains completely out of the plot romantic to only offer the typical comic and ducks counterpoint to his characters, by the way, that the end of his character can give that talk, depending on how you interpret.After the risky but perfect Match Point (2005) (envelope which is not disputed whether it is or not work master, that's no doubt, but if the movie is more than any other alleniana or represents a complete change of style) Allen returns to its more classic comedy in a seemingly simple movie, but so well made, nice and pleasant to see that it may end up being one of his best films.
2,371
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/949
Alberto Concepción
Camino a la perdición
4
5
muchocine
Road to perdition is film noir. Pure cinema. Sam Mendes appears when you make a film, you do it big. And to tell the truth, it succeeds.
The film is precisely characterized by an art where abound all kinds of genres. Historias.hay many. And also of all kinds. And in what regards the film noir, of course that there are. But, how long it was that he did not write and above all ran so well a feature film as well? And with these fantastic interpretations?Road to perdition is film noir. Pure cinema. Sam Mendes appears when you make a film, you do it big. Do and to tell the truth, the consigue.¿Por what? Because it has an interesting plot. Because it accompanies a proper soundtrack. Because it has an excellent picture. Because he knows all the resources. Because you know you do.And while the home may be rather slow, since the time the story begins, this leisurely pace has moments of great intensity and emotion. The details are great. Fans and non-fans of the genre will enjoy her because Mendes knows how to combine the prevailing severity of the film with touches of brilliant, own of the greats, with a paterno-filial relationship that drives the story, and that despite the marked coolness, manages to thrill.The way of shooting and the story is so perfectionist, it leads to believe that the director really made with the film he wanted, as he saw in his mind: he took advantage of to the maximum the screenplay by David Self, and gave him a longer personal touch, because after seeing your last address in Jarhead, can say that the footprint of the director is considerable in his films. And the truth is that precisely wrong not him he's gone: it seems that you can make each film to lead, magnificent works.And it is one of the pillars of the film is the interpretations section. It has a luxurious cast, in which each of the performers outboard its role. Excellent Paul Newman, Jude Law great and very correct Daniel Craig. But without a doubt, the best of all is the incredible performance of Tom Hanks, which marks their best record to date, full of expressions and gestures truly admirable, convincing, and that not everyone can be reached. A pleasant surprise. A success.Because in reality, we have one of the best black films of recent times. A luxury. A work of art. Cinema of truth.
2,372
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3555
Francisco Bellón
The Nanny Diaries (Diario de una Niñera)
1
5
muchocine
The Nanny Diaries (diary of a nanny) is a miserably failed attempt to join the Disney comedy with a serious analysis of New York high society.
Let's see, they raise their hand which have never dreamed to have Scarlett Johansson baby sitter, and here not worth no one is escaquee. Such plebiscite would obtain a safe and overwhelming majority that are the most those who want her being themselves already creciditos. No doubt it's a film that will give much to talk about all the messing and reveries will generate on this issue.Because despite the fact that already in the first Nicholas Art scene (one of the most envied children on the face of the Earth by more adults than kids) are you missing above the poor Johansson, then change radically and receives literally kicked out. The poor kid is not aware yet that due to this strange dichotomy should spend the rest of his life lying on the couch of some greedy psychologist. No less extraordinary is the blindness of the character of Paul Giamatti (why in first appearances managers want hide his face us to then reveal it without more?), which until the last third of the film not repaired in the innate skills of Johansson as a nanny. We strongly recommend that these great mysteries of humanity be investigated in depth by experts in the world of the paranormal, because they are beyond the capacity of the human being. The film lacks even the customary final speech, and on this occasion the Johansson touches him as partner Teddy a defenseless bear, who must suffer as the poor spectator such nonsense. If were not enough, and despite the fact that have sold us the film as a Disney comedy of postadolescentes, it is not at all, and is being raised as a field research in the field of anthropology. And well, The Nanny Diaries (diary of a nanny) has both anthropological research as big brother of sociological study of human behavior.The Nanny Diaries (diary of a nanny) is a miserably failed attempt to join the Disney comedy with a serious analysis of New York high society. And it also serves to see how far can go two great actresses like Scarlett Johansson and Laura Linney as bad characters with a hyphen so nefarious.
2,373
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/199
Kahzrrak
El código Da Vinci
3
5
muchocine
It is a film that I recommend to anyone who wants to have a fun time
And here comes one of the most eagerly awaited deliveries for this year, starring Tom Hanks and Audrey Tatou (that she is gorgeous, everything must be said), with secondary appearance of some fantastic Jean Reno, Paul Bettany and Ian McKellen.I am one of those who has seen the film but has not read the book. If you don't have time to read all what I want to!. Because, despite this, I must say that I really liked and felt me very entertaining. Seems to be based on real historical studies (although the data appearing in the movie whether or not truthful, is not for me me judge it) and draw much attention how fits perfectly in works written by other authors (that famous head of woman that the Templars worshiped and that helped it were accused of heresy, for example) if it is true that discerning it in other data (for example the reason why French Crown) (it helped its extermination, which seems to be that it was indeed political or, better still, economic: a reading that could you this a little further clarification could be "Beltrán, the last Templar", although it's a little suckling pig, heh, heh).It is a film that I as detective encuadradía: the protagonistan are caught up in problems without eating or drinking and are forced to solve all the puzzles that are them are raised while they flee from various enemies. The performance of the actors is fantastic (well is true that many of the actors are not exactly beginners) and history is very well framed, without flaws in the plot, you hooked and is not slow in no time. In addition, which interested the topic of the Templars, of the secrets of the Church and similar things I suppose that he will be happy if you are going to see her. In fact, upon seeing her very clear why the Church has not given credit to this work. They appear in the story characters from the Church of Opus Dei, the supposed are the heirs of the Temple, etc., making that the Viewer does not know well who is the "bad" nor what relationship are interrelated with each other until the end, thus keeping the mystery until the end of the film.In short, it mixes mythology with religion, history and fiction, is a film that I recommend to anyone who wants to have a fun time.
2,374
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4152
Oscar Martínez
OSS 117: El Cairo, nido de espías
3
5
muchocine
His sense of humour interspersed cafre with refined in a very successful way, thanks largely to an excellent Jean Dujardin which derides the stereotype of secret agent to the absolute limits.
Directed by Michel Hazanavicius and starring Jean Dujardin, Bérénice Bejo, Aure Atika, Philippe Lefebvre, Constantin Alexandrov, Said Amadis, Laurent Bateau and François Damiens, this weekend comes to our charts almost in total anonymity OSS 117: El Cairo, nest of spies.Based on characters created by Jean Bruce, the film puts us in Cairo from 1955, a real nest of spies. Everyone mistrusts everyone, all plot against everybody: English, French, Soviets, the family of the deposed King Farouk, who wants to return to the throne, the Eagles of Cheops, a religious sect that wants to take power. The President of the French Republic, René Coty, sends his master weapon to put this crazy House in order at the edge of chaos: Hubert Bonisseur of Bath, called OSS 117.Lo true is that in my life I had heard of the novels of Jean Bruce, but one is surprised to discover that the first of these was published four years before the appearance of James Bondbecoming a bestseller at the time with a total of 265 novels behind him.Curiously, director Michel Hazanavicius decided to take this archetype of secret agent virile, seductive and somewhat misogynist, something normal for the time but completely outdated today day, and transform it into a caricature of itself, so the character is approaching more to other nefarious secret agents such as smart, Mortadelo y Filemón or even Austin Powers than the beloved 007. But, unlike the parade of freaks supposed, to cite the example more recent, the second incursion of the characters of Ibáñez in the celluloid, the dander of OSS 117: El Cairo, nest of spies has some charm, basically by its elaborate production design and certain refinement in his humor.Certainly in the gala film are inevitable supposedly funny gags that start just smiles minds protozoicas or more Associates relatives of the writers, but generally his sense of humour interspersed cafre with refined in a very successful way, thanks largely to an excellent Jean Dujardin, who with their constant grimaceshis misogyny, his total ignorance of the other cultures and their absolute lack of intuition derides the stereotype of secret agent to the absolute limits.On the other hand, and as I said something above, both the production design and its great soundtrack will transport us to the Decade of the 1960s and 1970s, in which James Bond dominated in the twilight of the spies, capturing quite rightly that atmosphere kitsch and retro believe.In summary, a fun movie (although not a wonder) that he does not hesitate to take its context to launch certain critical lapidatorias both to the East as, above all, to the current West.
2,375
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1099
Radon
Arthur y los Minimoys
5
5
muchocine
Our small critic, suggested to record the video at the end of the film, to see no less than 1000 times, her I calificaré excellent.
Well, the truth is that with this I entretuve much, and I must say that I was not the only one. Had much cattle to try a history with Celtic characters, such as Elves, I love all those things from a very early age.But back to what interests our young critic, remained mesmerized by the screen in one of the longest films has seen. Usually just something tired towards the end, and usually end up in the arms of any of us, but this time it did not.The adventures published by Arthur, in the company of a Princess Selenia, too loaded of sensuality for a young audience of only 4 years, which does not understand even of contoneos, maintains in a fun and entertaining tension between funny characters Elvish and hair-raising struggles.Without a doubt, a good way to pass the time, and to understand that children are also capable of great achievements with effort, tenacity and courage. And that our small critic, suggested to record the video at the end of the film, to see no less than 1000 times, her I calificaré of excellent.
2,376
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2529
Albert Puyuelo
Next
1
5
muchocine
The script there is no grab it even if it goes with the best predisposition, and if were not enough the tape where is extremely cheat. And if not, eye to patch this way, which will leave with your mouth open more than one Viewer.
The day in which an Executive came up that could be used the expression "do inspired in?" rather than "do based in?" was a great day for Hollywood. An ideal subterfuge with which cover the backs to the public by the myriad of outrages carried out with novels, works of theatre or even actual and historical facts.Science fiction has been one of the main victims, as there are countless cases in which a good idea becomes a vulgar action film. This is the case of Next, freely inspired by a free Philip k. Dick story titled The Golden Man. It is a Wizard of third in Las Vegas, which puts their physical Nicolas Cage and little else, has the gift of seeing their future with two minutes in advance. Such quality makes that an FBI agent, played by Julianne Moore, ask you for help to avert nuclear catastrophe. But oh, the poor Devil just wants to live a happy and quiet life with a woman, that the vase of Jessica Biel puts its curves, with whom he is obsessed. Who wait to see a work of science fiction that addresses critical and philosophical topics already can go to forgetting Next. On the other hand, those who are looking for a film in which the argument is a mere excuse to give way to an endless sequence of action and Visual effects will enjoy nice with Next. The script there is no grab it even if it goes with the best predisposition, and if were not enough the tape where is extremely cheat. And if not, eye to patch this way, which will leave with their mouths open to more than one Viewer, and these, in a vain attempt to seek an explanation fairly reasonable, brought the screen without leaving their astonishment.Who had the gift of seeing the future as Nicolas Cage's character. With such capacity, many disgraces which we support in a movie theater or on the couch in our House we could save us.
2,377
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1208
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Un abril encantado
4
5
muchocine
Smells like bbc on all four sides. These small films are springboards to fame: soft entertainment transcendent unpretentious for a public fed up already perhaps bizarre plot machinery of E.M. Foster or for a public alien, altogether, to her.
The greedy Victorian Philo run by Ivory in the film and by the BBC on television holds an autonomous subgenre, smeared the same Excellencies, adorned with the same exquisite furniture, incorporated in the same engolado and cheesy, refined and strict, cliché of fierce moral conventions. An enchanted April is not return to Howard's End or A room with a view, or, much less, the fantastic Dubliners, but exhibits similar aesthetic and formal patterns, and dive, such as those listed in the soul more British etiquetablemente, encorsetada in their colonial desire and their imperialism of tea at five and table camilla musicada by pleasant syntactical twists: the EnglishWhen they speak, they are very his and raise the adverb to levels of phonetic hysteria as anyone on the planet.A delighted April smells like BBC on all sides: is one younger son, who has missed flight around the large room. No more boot already know that it will have a clean, sober finish, a roster of actors of the first order and a novelistic script watered by agile and added formidably care dialogue.An enchanted April is also a reflection on the myth of the voyage. Myth, on the other hand, inherent in the England of late 19th century and the 20th starts. In the middle of world war I, four women, played by different ailments, need of therapies is, decide to rent the castle of San Salvatore, on the Italian coast. Fleeing from their husbands, although they are fleeing from England, which is a more punitive and harsh husband: escape the climate and forms and overused showcase of protocols and figuramientos. The London pompous and refined, gossip, maledicente, makes these ladies of rank to take the paradise of the Italian Castle as a bulwark of their dreams, their hopes and final recompesa by all the time (lost, miserably) imagine it.In these rooms live these four ladies its wonderful April its haunted spring opening, how not, the love, the wholesomeness of the sea and its miraculous effects in some lungs burned by the fog. The roles are romantic: search the more standard meaning and we will find the romanticism that inhabits the film: in each small Flash. Evil, however, does not exist. Every thing on the site which should be: on the site which based they have tended. All leading to the sudden discovery of happiness and the (immediate) awareness of their loss.Does not take Ivory, which is already lagging, to make a decent product in this very British genre: Newell meets far. The BBC gives formidable children, curte actors worth and impregnates his seal scenes, smells and sensations that remain, indeblemente, in memory of the Viewer, whether or not the perfidious Albion.Estas son small films are springboards to fame: soft entertainment transcendent unpretentious for a public fed up already perhaps bizarre plot machinery of E.M. Foster or for a foreign audience, completely to it.
2,378
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2130
Patri
El viento que agita la cebada
3
5
muchocine
A movie that is worth seeing, especially if you're Irish or want to understand the conflict in that country, while always taking into account the point of view is very subjective.
The wind that shakes the barley occurs at an important time in the history of Ireland, is an effective film that achieves its purpose, which is to have that part of the story from the Irish perspective. While Ken Loach is English, their compatriots in the film do not go well unemployed, are seen as assassins and invaders in a country that was not his, not is if this actually corresponds to reality, but what matters ultimately is the quality of the film, and I think that it is well built but fails to thrill as it should, and that contains quite hard scenes that should be more impact, but do not.Cillian Murphy is the protagonist and is correct in his role, although it could perhaps have done it same or better, others are not well known actors, but everyone does a correct interpretation.In short, a film which is worth seeing, especially if you're Irish or want to understand the conflict in that country, while always taking into account the point of view is very subjective.
2,379
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1864
Matías Cobo
Shooter: El Tirador
3
5
muchocine
While his script bet by a certain complexity in the political thriller, Shooter stays on the grounds of a good and entertaining action movie proposal
We live in times of distrust and the cinema, as a reflection of their contemporaneity, comes as well laying it in many current films. The shooter (Shooter), a notable and valid attempt to regain the successful action film postponed today by the multitude of adaptations 'comiqueras', is an example of this premise. Its protagonist presents any concomitance with the iconic character of John Rambo more than acceptable first tape of this sequel (cornered) unearthed again by Stallone (John Rambo, last delivery is in phase of shooting). Like Rambo, Bob Lee Swagger (an effective Mark Wahlberg) elite sniper is now a military cornered and disappointed by the army and the nation by which they gave so much. However, in his crusade against whom he instructed as a lethal marksman from remote distances appear new sub-plots, and of greater complexity, to elaborate on the idea of corruption entrenched between the spheres of power.I.e., the film tells us in many of their current stories stories that completely banish any hint of Candida confidence towards those who rule the most powerful countries. So the new heroes struggling closer to the public and less lofty ideals: honoring a dead companion, save a loved, uncover an injustice or restore his own honor. Today already seems little credible and therefore difficult identification, the encorajinado hero that flag in ready, fight for their grandiose nation champion of freedom and more healthy values. The nativist fanfare has given way to a more domestic and human heroism.And under this premise is built the main character of Shooter, last work of Antoine Fuqua in which the director of Training Day returns to demonstrate his good hand when handling the levers of action. Its adjusted length of two hours resembles measured the millimeter to not leave space to yawning. And while his script bet by a certain complexity in the political thriller, Shooter stays on the grounds of a good and entertaining action movie proposal.The former model of Calvin Klein Mark Wahlberg leads a cast that, paradoxes of life, your enemy is a corrupt military played by Danny Glover, former hero opposite Mel Gibson in the lethal weapon franchise popular. It can also be seen an increasingly popular face of the actor of Mexican descent Michael Peña, already seen in films directed by Eastwood or Oliver Stone. Each fulfills its role, more or less prototypical, and make a film which returns to rely on an old and successful Alchemy Shooter: spectacular images more action without truce, equal to insured entertainment.
2,380
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2562
José A. Peig
Los Goonies
3
5
muchocine
We are all agree that the film by Richard Donner is a toy to have some fun on a silly day. But it will also be true that there was no nor the moment there is a film like this, so magical and fun despite its flaws.
We are looking for the explanation of certain myths and we run into small masterpieces that have marked a generation. We never went Goonies, and nor had a map of the hidden treasure in the attic, a magical corner of life in which tears and exorcise the misfortunes of the child that will always be child. The soul of the story (better said comics), Sean Astin asthmatic and charming, look at the landscape of the Goon docks (! hence comes Goonies!), detached houses between the pines and the cosy port terrain, and a sea that extends on the horizon. Here never happens anything fun, he sighs disconsolate as drops in the mattress of the bed. He even imagine, is that at the end magic takes the form of a pirate ship whose silhouette hides shadows because of a Sun that dawns on the waves. They are dreams only cinema can materialize. Important thing is not to find the treasure. What matters is to be a Goonie, i.e., living the dream of adventure that delivers us from external reality, the back up, which we expected to ascend through the well of wishes.Steven Spielberg and Chris Columbus raised a story that combined to Indiana Jones with the pirate archetype (nice tribute to Errol Flyn) and worldwide Freak of the dreamers and the abused, in humorous key and under a teenage impulse which traps without complexes derived product kitsch tontorrón and often corny, but vertebrate with a characterology of profiles and situations that succeed in creating a unique style and genuine. We are all agree that the film by Richard Donner is a toy to have some fun on a silly day. But it will also be true that there was no nor the moment there is a film like this, so magical and fun despite its flaws. Its flaws may be its virtues, by the sincerity with which is catching a grotesque ridiculería tones. We all know that the scene "Gordi" and "Sloth", saying I love you under a bright blue sky (and with the Superman shirt!!!) (I might add that Sloth is one of the more ridiculous characters that have never seen), it is one of the most pathetic moments that has given birth to the seventh art, but tradition sends and in the memory and the imagination of the young film lover endures the idea that, at the end and after all, that is part of the magic, the chemistry that arises between the ducks and marginalized gordito and the "Monster" cave, equally hated and detained in the world.The film, then, is this freshness that makes it timeless in the unique synthesis of elements Freaks and the casual comical whereby the writers are entailed the comic with jokes and several winks, some quite stupid, others more fortunate and some not free a restrained sense of the macabre. Perhaps the best explanation for the fascination aroused by even today after more than twenty years, and despite being a very simplistic film is the perfect use of editing and visual rhythm. The successive "gags", "traps", jokes, are sequenced so that the half-heartedness of the story ends up being absorbent, rhythm, if the narrative is insubstantial, this is disguised by the tremendous visual fluency, austere production design and a soundtrack that evokes the dream of the protagonist: Sean Astin looking at the waterfall of the well of wishesdiscovering the map under the dust over the decades, confraternizando with the skeleton of a centenary pirate; Your were the first Goonie. In this scene, in particular, (emotional game plans and contraplanos of the face of Mikey faced the skull of Willie the one-eyed man) the film is their dignity, which justifies the other nonsense, the resolute return to the initial here never happens anything fun. They, along with the image of the pirate ship away on the waves, and the stunned púberes and adult gaze, film in its purest form. Or how a mediocre film gets to be really good.
2,381
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4265
Rafa Delgado
Juno
4
5
muchocine
Charming.
Juno has left me an taste infinitely better than I expected. In the entry on the nominations to Oscar, her called the Little miss Sunshine of this year, but with that, have nothing in common, except that it is a more or less "independent" comedy - "indies" of these fashionable are now (Little miss Sunshine go no further). In addition, it is much better movie and better written, although that, is less fun, kooky and. but, what I comparing them? Anyway, I left lead.The fact is that found me a lovely film, and did not expect me, the truth. It has caught me completely by surprise. Is a joy to see a film with a story the sea of simple, but which is built around a very good script by Diablo Cody (his first screenplay, his first nomination to the Oscar), of some very good actors (enormísima and brilliant Ellen Page; what a pity that you have enough crude to win the Oscar for best main actress which is nominated. Although anything is possible), and an even better direction from Jason Reitman (also nominated), which provides a smooth and constantly balanced pace. Something in what paste you a good kick a Little miss. It will be possible? I'm comparing them!In addition, addressing the issue that is, does not fall into demagogues cheap or too recurrent panfletarismos today, which is appreciated. It's just like life itself.Any important to be commented on hits. Well, Yes, sometimes there is the feeling that the history goes lurching to find a destination in particular, and that the resolution of a character could have been better. but nothing serious.Recommended.
2,382
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3806
Ana Belén Pacheco
Fred Claus: El Hermano Gamberro de Santa Claus
2
5
muchocine
Fred Claus is expendable but possibly less annoying than the thirteenth part that wants to present Disney this Christmas.
The Christmas tinker are quite disappointing. And to the poster appear Vince Vaughn, Paul Giamatti, Rachel Weisz, Kevin Spacey, Kathy Bates, Miranda Richardson, or John Michael Higgins, is a hook that few film buffs can let go but is really like these traps for rabbits. You know that if you get to eat the carrot the door will fall and you will be locked in a cage waiting to receive the coup de grace. Fred is the older brother of Santa. As we all know the Saints remain frozen in time and all their relatives and spouses are benefited by this divine prerogative. But as el gordo San Nicolas is a good guy his older brother who has lived in its shadow from an early age has dedicated itself to spend hundreds of years malviviendo and wheeling and dealing while his younger brother earned the respect from the American base to leave gifts on Christmas Eve. But in the times or the Christmas business is safe and very bad bad Kevin Spacey person to make an inspection at the pole and close the snack bar. The happy event coincides with the forced Fred visit in search of money putting on silver platter the head of the fat man dressed in red.If we compare Fred Claus with the rest of the genre films possibly it come out well in some form despite his childish and white humor has what few others, i.e. this roster of actors that can make it more enjoyable and solvent. I must admit that there are three very entertaining moviegoers moments who managed to get me a sincere smile: the ninguneados brothers support group (self-criticism Baldwininana and the moment layer red himself Lex Luthor and a favorite for all antinavideños: the physical assault towards the figure of Santa Claus with uprooting of included head.)In short, Fred Claus is expendable but possibly less annoying than the thirteenth part that wants to present Disney this Christmas.
2,383
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2773
Tito Chinchan
Las edades de Lulú
5
5
muchocine
Erotic movie, jewel of the Spanish film about the sex life of a girl, from adolescence to maturity. Heavy sexual scenes tell us a story of submission and love does if not become essential in the library of any movie buff follower of Onan.
The ages of Lulu is based on a novel by Almudena Grandes. The actress who was to embody the main character at first refused after learning the explicitness of the sex scenes. Since then the scenes are not without reaching film pornographic, nor much less monjiles. We would rather say that they are equipped with an important sexual load, overflowing sensuality. More best, that makes me the picha to break coconuts. As you wish.The film is about the life of Lulu, its evolution through sexual intercourse is. Tells a story of submission to Paul, a friend of the family, which takes you by the hand through the world of sex. Since his teens, up crazy maturity of a woman who has lost the North, Bigas Luna directed the writing of Almudena.Recuerdo the first times I saw this film, which had recorded glorious early Telecinco. I was able to completely scratch tape, the times that I gave to the "palante" and the "Patras". With the passing of the years, I learned that between tit and ass had some dialogues that perhaps deserve the penalty be heard. And later, I realized the story who wanted us to have. Certainly if it becomes one of arthouse not had given so many opportunities.In short, erotic film, jewel of the Spanish film about the sex life of a girl, from adolescence to maturity. Heavy sexual scenes tell us a story of submission and love does if not become essential in the library of any movie buff follower of Onan. Spanish erotic film classic A.Besitos.P.D: The actress has a morbid which must be mortal sin.Pd2: Both sex, sex so much and I forget serving Bardem, making gay amateur to weird stuff. The scene in which put you what has been the fist behind the boy gives up afraid to see him. Good, and acts her mother, Mrs María Barranco, and more that I don't remember. The truth is that Francesca Neri and her sensuality overshadows them.
2,384
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/653
Plissken
Infiltrados
4
5
muchocine
Lesson of nerve, rhythm, planning and direction of actors of Scorsese, whom he notices again at home portraying violence in the American suburbs.
It was time! He had not returned to have news of Martin Scorsese Film of fiction from the already distant 'Casino' (1995). Yes, it is true, since there is a type who has shot with his name 'Kundun' (1997), 'on the edge' (1999), 'Gangs of New York' (2002) and 'The Aviator' (2004), but that this was not Scorsese. It seemed, but it wasn't. Which has directed 'The Departed' ('infiltrators' in "modern Titrator"), that it is Martin Scorsese.Remake confessor (at least by Scorsese) of the acclaimed 'Infernal Affairs' of Wai Keung Lau and Siu Fai Mak, 'The Departed' tells the story of Colin Sullivan (Matt Damon convincing) and Billy Costigan (clear Leonardo Di Caprio), two men who are crossing their destinations on both sides of the law in the shadow of the pre-civil mafia boss Frank Costello (Jack overwhelming) (Nicholson). One strives to become the best, the other can only aspire to survive. Deception, death and betrayal deleted the fine line separating legal from illegal, in a territory where all are guilty in the eyes of someone.Lesson of nerve, rhythm, planning and direction of actors of Scorsese, whom he notices again at home portraying violence in the American suburbs. No one, not even the great Asian film (well, perhaps Tarantino Yes), is able to make you fall a sadistic torturer as the Nicholson character as well. Michael Ballhaus, pictured, recreates a South Boston dark and decadent by the criminals moving rats, which contrasts with the bright and sophisticated surroundings of the police elite. They are the two parallel worlds between which move both protagonists.The secondary function with as much energy as the protagonists: Alec Baldwin, Mark Wahlberg (the surprise of the movie, for me), Martin Sheen, Ray Winstone and Vera Farmiga surround the star trio of outstanding form.The unique buts that can be put on this return to the first division of Martin Scorsese is little dramatic weight has the love element in the plot of the film, and that repeated songs ('Gimme shelter' stones and ' I´m shipping up to Boston' of the Dropkick Murphy´s sound twice each), but this is a my paranoiadoes not affect the film. Incidentally, one of the best news of this 2006: Marty has returned. And what is best, recently announced that he is thinking away from the Hollywood industry because"to more spending, less risk you take". They will return the time of 'Taxi Driver' or 'The last temptation of Christ'? A 8'5, half step below 'Casino' and one and a half below the large.
2,385
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1814
Rafa Ferrer
El número 23
2
5
muchocine
The number 23 is a poorly exploited idea, while the home is excellent and the first minutes make you illusions to a ravishing Ribbon of suspense, this becomes a bluff, in a kind of moral that pica of one hundred different sources and not delves into nothing.
There are 2 different types of Jim Carrey, as if it were 2 Siamese brothers, one is Jim Carrey comedy acts, that payasete that either you love well (as it is my case) or you falls as a kick in the very, on the other hand we have Jim Carrey dramatic actor, that which dazzles you with movies such as "Man on the moon", "The Truman Show" or "forget about of my", that another actor that makes cuddle Oscar, to fall into his arms, but uncle Oscar who also hate Carrey; in this film Carrey left possess by the two brothers, in large part because the 2nd giving dramatic approach, too bad that at the end of the Ribbon and in the last bars sobreactúe and gesticule as if in a comedy.The number 23 is an idea poorly exploited, while the home is excellent and the first minutes make you illusions to a ravishing Ribbon of suspense, this becomes a bluff, in a kind of moral that pica of one hundred different sources and not delves into nothing, is like a small child with a dish of mealHowever much it Pecks and plays, not takes benefit of the stew.Disservice makes a painful coordination of the tape, Mr Schumacher, sincerely dediquesé to make sock, the film is is atragantando completely, with a very bad direction of actors, where each goes to his ball and where there is no feelling at any time in the development.A dark picture, a script that is eventually diffused, two areas that are trying to be different and that, as in a bad imitation of "The hours" just juntandose in a "whole" that little or has nothing to do with a finish so chorra which seems to catch with pins, cheater but not power and abrupt almost like a bus.Virginia Madsen adorable, since I I joined with her in "Entre Copas", her auguré a future filled with work, and I was not wrong or a little. Perhaps better than Carrey in any footage, giving his character (little) package you need.Of course not everything is going to be negative, at least I liked much the agile movements of camera and the "promotion" of reading (that must be read, readers mine, that but we are some sheep.).It is a tape made to generate controversy, in internet forums and in other sites of debate, as happened with "The Ring" the remake of Gore Verbinski, where every one saw that gave the win on screen.In short: as he said Sarah Connor No future, there is only that we do
2,386
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1851
Tito Chinchan
Batman begins
4
5
muchocine
Popcorn and sofa. I recommend it.
Batman is so called since that gave fear of bats and decides to confront their fears. That game it give this! Imagine they had given fear traffic lights, chickens, cockroaches or Strawberry calipos. That little imagination had the creators of this character (but that good vision commercial, given that CalipoMan had not taken both pull, sure).The film is, as its name suggests, the beginning of Batman. When I was a child, his father was a wealthy altruistic (already starting science fiction) that gives everything for their city. One day, this rewards you killing him and his wife, so Batman decides to travel the world in vigilante plan. In a prison close to where Moses gave the three voices, is reconducido by a man that she wants to get into a kind of sect dedicated to clean up the world of criminals. After adriestarle, pass loads of things that I am not telling you.In this movie they spend such amount of stuff, worth long that is. It has nothing to do with the above, we do not have a bad more silly than a sweet potato, for example. The bad guys are bad and rightly so, but bad really, anything from nonsense. The argument quickly latches and the story is nice. Secondary actors are good and very well give the pego. And the special effects are not too exaggerated and Yes very correct. He end is what seemed more silly and absurd, but you can go because the set is very good.In short, popcorn and sofa. I recommend it.Besis.P.D: Nothing it if they had given him fear the Rails (if not I say bust and full of guts all).Pd2: Pollaman, heh, heh.P.D.3: that day more tonto, really;-)
2,387
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4353
Caruco
Hula Girls
2
5
muchocine
Topical to say enough is enough.
Based on a true story is a subgenre itself, and what happens in this tells Japanese production, between the sympathetic drama and comedy that wants to play the chord of the spectator, the initiative in a mining town, Iwaki, than in 1965, and the crisis of the coal by the substitution of the oil, he decided to recycle much of their jobs by creating a Hawaiian theme park as a tourist attraction.An unusual idea for the time needed, as a first step, the collaboration of the girls of the place to learn to dance the traditional and tourist, dance Hawaiian hula. A few young people who begin their particular Full monty clad these exotic and daring costumes even showing the navel!.The work also will become a personal struggle for trying to leave the mediocre fate that awaits them, and logically a way to overcome if same as people. Among other battles, they must deal with conservative and traditional attitudes especially between fathers and daughters, that ocasionarán not few discussions, even physical attacks. But against all adversity, and the logical initial setbacks of the emerging dancers, nothing will stop the progress.Young Japanese director, of Korean origin, Lee Sang-il, has in its hands a material with abundant ingredients to please easily to the public; and in fact, Japan has been an overwhelming success. Hula girls has in addition a clear will to try to conquer the international market. Seems both in its treatment and staging more a Western film that not Asian. If cambiarámos their interpreters for other Europeans or Americans, we left without any distinctive trait of their nationality.And isn't that one wait to find the spirit of Ozu in its history or images, but not expect check copy the manula topical situations for the occasion or as falls repeatedly into the more helpings, sweetened and predictable. A collection of topics, both in the characters and situations, or unnecessarily lengthening the scenes supposedly more melodramatic and important. The only thing remarkable perhaps dance sticks the Professor Hirayama (Yasuko Matsuyuki, almost a kind of Professor Keating, in exit of the club of dead poets, female version), before its first pupils who contemplate it, through a window, with admiration.
2,388
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3485
Iñaki Bilbao
El asesinato de Richard Nixon
3
5
muchocine
Good first job after the Chambers of his filmmaker. A hard but necessary, film that makes us think to go much further than the vision of a long-announced human tragedy.
Hard first movie of Niels Mueller, sober and unforgiving as few.Through a pace calm, but relentless in the direction to the most painful internal hell of a man unhappy, full of good feelings, but doomed to deeper failure by his uncontrollable social extremism, we witness the self-destruction of the protagonist.Mueller takes his time to make progress in the development of the fall of that person, that we should not forget, there was really; and it does so relentless, crushing.Sean Penn gives his character of a lost soul which we feel close, that we give you reason in the Fund, as their wishes are ours, but however, we can not get with him given the injustice of their acts. This dichotomy, strange and frankly annoying to the Viewer, as we see injustice that must endure on a daily basis the protagonist, but we cannot familiarize ourselves with him because although the Fund assists, the shape and the far that takes everything you think or do, requires us to reject it. That same make which surround him.Moments like some conversations with his wife, his brother, his boss (magnificent Jack Thompson) or the interview with the man that could give you the opportunity to start a new life of honest businessman, azoran to the Viewer, feeling something that moves between the tenderness and the embarrassment. How much you want to the protagonist we applaud, but at the same time we know that it is impossible, that in this materialistic and selfish society is an Entelechy, a mere dream and even a social danger. What would happen if all act in the same way as him?A hard but necessary, film that makes us think to go much further than the vision of a long-announced human tragedy. Superb soundtrack.
2,389
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4124
Francisco Bellón
La criatura perfecta
1
5
muchocine
The perfect creature is a second entertainment film row, pretentious, boring and does not offer any incentive for viewing.
For more years that take following the film today, always surprises the ability of some publishers to recover mediocre films and try to make them reach our country as what they are not, cult or big-budget films.Any excuse is good, and the perfect creature is a good proof of that is that in its Spanish poster appears more clearly the phrase "from the creators of the Lord of the rings" to the title of the film. It is not the best of omens to begin referring to the trilogy by Peter Jackson, which by the way, has nothing to do with this project. However, at first glance the perfect creature had good mimbres to be one more than acceptable tape fantasy and science fiction. However, the film is misleading since your first minute, and all the goodwill with which the Viewer could go to the cinema disappears after the initial prologue. The script, simpleton and vulgar, lacks full of originality and own fantasy elements, and history there where take it. The perfect creature has also a tepid whiff to political-religious speech with certain éitcos of the most absurd and child leave. Visually, the film uses the copy of previous work, and Glenn Standring leaves his personal imprint offering a chaos to pretend to be original. Only the presence of Dougray Scott (would one day give you a character that is not tormented?) and Saffron Burrows a little saves the situation.The perfect creature is a second entertainment film row, pretentious, boring and does not offer any incentive for viewing. And still has to be to thank the film pass without penalty or glory by the Billboard, and is that he could have created a great discomfort in certain institutions.
2,390
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3726
Rafa Ferrer
Un funeral de muerte
3
5
muchocine
It is more intense than that "In Out" and rather more interesting than "Perfect women".
As Zach Helm spoke on "Mr Magorium and his magic shop" of death in an easy manner and quasi - child, here, the legendary Frank Oz (not just famous for the Muppets and Yoda in Star Wars), tells us in a fun way what can happen at a funeral in any part of the world; the takes as a reference (and also as humor) to a British family, but apparently the tape well can occur from in Spain up in any part of the planet.Oz creates situations hilarious but not power, all of them from the first minute from a Prism daily comicamente, which, again, may be as common as fun, without falling into the casquivano or unpleasant, and using all the resources that are in his hand, to make fun and enjoyable development of the tape.In the roster of players, a group of British acquaintances of those that we all know, but we don't remember their names, people like Alan Tudyk (secondary in plenty of movies), Ewen Bremner (the mythical "Trainspotting" Spud) and so to complete this deal. The idea of Oz include little-known (but recognizable) faces was likelihood provide the film, in the wider and comic of the word sense.In the script, are devoted to perform, as already mentioned, any type of barrabasada at the funeral, always looking for the fun of the Viewer, on the other hand, some gags are a bit forced and are brutally recherché, and is that while there are a hundred of situations that one can know or feel identified, others are too little credible, hence fetched them.The score of Murray Gold is enjoyable and fun with these touches of guitar, they do comedy even more funny if possible, with a few notes that are repeated to greater or lesser intensity as the plot progresses.In short, it is more intense than that "In Out" and rather more interesting than "Perfect women".
2,391
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/452
Natalia Eseverri
Clerks 2
3
5
muchocine
It comedy more than fun, with an exquisite maturity is reflected in each of the dialogues and scenes.
"Clerks 2", a film which went companion and I never thought that I would like, more than anything because Kevin Smith until that I met my current partner gave me very bad luck, it turns out that the movie is very well. The first "Clerks" have to admit he I not enthusiastic at all, not I understood that it was intended to make the director with that aesthetic in black and white, or nor I understood social criticism with the acid humor that had in the movie. But with the passage of time, Kevin Smith has managed to have a personality as an author and in the case of "Clerks 2" make one comedy rather than fun, with an exquisite maturity is reflected in each of the dialogues and scenes. It is what I most stands out about him, his scripts, they are the basis of his film and what makes his films unique and at the same time the viewer Gets a good time with uncouth jokes but also feels identified with the world that surrounds him and some frika that appear during the film. Highlight the scene in which the subject we are discussing Star Wars vs. Lord of the rings, is a newcomer to interpret a Catholic, inocenton, geek named Elias who is the very best that has appeared on the screen lately and these gestures and grimaces of the silent Bob to make him as mythological as the critic in "The girl in the water", rather than endearing. A good option to stick a few laughter and so many learn to use gags in conditions without laugh track.
2,392
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3338
Tito Chinchan
Furia de Titanes
5
5
muchocine
Classic adventure on heavenly disputes of Greek mythology. It tastes like festive period, Christmas NAP with the kids running around the House and you settled the binges on the couch. Grandiose.
I like these films of rancid colors. These happen over and over again when upcoming seminars, see Christmas or Easter periods. I like that you can see them awhile, you go to make popcorn, to service, to play with your children, and come back when you still hooked. The I've been watching this late, what did more things. And not only I've heard, if not that I liked. Now don't you know do these things? Are we more magnanimous with papier-mache than with the computer? Who knows.The film is about the Celestial movements of Greek mythology. Zeus apparently had a mess with a human, becoming rain (fine mode to say, of course), and her preñó of Perseus. But hete here that the father of the girl not learned that the preñador was the great bastard, I say haceedor, so they got into a tomb of cardboard stone (is that fleet) mother and son and threw them into the sea. Puff, put Zeus as an arm of the sea and tells na less than the God of the sea to draw the Titan that you delete the map to the city of the murderous King's daughters and grandchildren. Step gives an abracito that fuses. Cool or not cool the idea? To me makes me.Tremendous, tremendous. For starters, the touch stale old special effects with movements impossible, as if missed frames with papier-mache on all sides, with everything you need to stick to the sofa. The argument is full of gossip, which already warned me my dear mother-in-law to the mythological clamoring, where all are parents or mothers of human and among them want to kill the kids. Well, it said, were not. And the greatest thing is the flavor family who have these films, to sit on the couch to see her with a giant popcorn Bowl covered with the blanket and seeing how they killed including jellyfish, krákenes and the mother who gave birth.In short, classic adventure on heavenly disputes of Greek mythology. It tastes like festive period, Christmas NAP with the kids running around the House and you settled the binges on the couch. Grandiose. What special effects, what effects.Besitos.P.D: Get the teacher (I dare not write it) of Harry Potter. Which is head of his house and has a face of chard.Pd2: Ah, and ladies in porretas without coming to story. That joy found cute breasts and sober buttocks in the middle of a NAP.
2,393
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3597
Sandra Ríos
30 días de oscuridad
3
5
muchocine
It is a very dark and entertaining onstage version. Does not make the version of cult, but if it will undoubtedly become a new point of reference for copy and consider when making a new version.
They have been very few tapes who manage to stay in my memory of the zombie genre and/or vampires. However, 30 days of night is the exception to something which is already considered to be a personal rule. This film premiered at United States in the last season of Halloween, is the film version of a comic Steven Niles participated in the script for this version and Ben Templesmith whose initial idea was intended to be brought to the big screen but received refusals, became a successful comic whose first publication occurred in the year 2002. In countries such as United States and Spain, deliveries of this comic have exceeded sales unthinkable, turning it into the 3rd best-selling format in the world comic.On this occasion the vampires are taken to Barrow in Alaska, which is the northernmost region of the United States and the population located more to the North around the world to make their own, taking advantage of the event that year after year there, happens to the stay the population two months exactly, in complete darkness during the winter season. Therefore the natural conditions of Barrow, make its inhabitants the perfect feast for these vampires, impressing the claustrophobic atmosphere generated because of the absence of light.It is a 1: 53 minutes where evokes the horror genre to ancient and where the suspense was strategically planned in each of the scenes with a quick pace that contradicts what some comments mentioned early in this regard. Seduces the terrifying characterization made this "species" and not understandable language in which communicate. At this point, I join the voices that highlighted this and mentioned that the strange language that talk about vampires, you more credibility to the tape, unlike many other films, where beings coming from distant worlds or even our but totally isolated to our way of life can understand us and even better talks with us. Furthermore, as beings that Act almost like animals the use of this resource for the good of film is minimal.Within 30 days of darkness or night as it resulted in Colombia, no room for religious salvation, because no Holy instrument is valid for terminating them. Here it is only finishing them behind and ruthless form as they do with humans. For this reason, blood wheel for all parties but not hastía. And after all this serious hits and well-managed events, comes his unexpected final away any pink termination but with great beauty at the same time, with which you're satisfied the film and with a very good taste.As every movie heroes and villains, the battle occurs, but not drew you enough benefit. This is his greatest failure. The fight between the protagonist, a sheriff and the vampire King of the herd, is bland and fairly easily unlike what fans of the comic happens. Incidentally and thanks to the participation of the same creator on the screenplay for the film, each other is distinguished only by some details. The other point, are its main actors Josh Hartnett still not suupera her acclaimed performance in Black Haw down in 2001, but that sorprede for its versatility that we have seen this in various roles in almost all genres and Melissa George, remembered for his role in the film tourists last year, because both do their job even though they do not Excel, especially Mellissa whose performance is little spontaneous. 30 days of night does not ends for sale worldwide and will be part of the Billboard in many countries next year, so I recommend it because it is a very dark and entertaining vampirezca version. Does not make the version of worship that many would expect, but if it will undoubtedly become a new point of reference for copy and consider when making a new version.
2,394
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2720
Dragon negro
White Noise 2
2
5
muchocine
The idea of the film is not entirely wrong and could have given more than not to be by a painful direction of Patrick Lussier, responsible for this mess, get, come to some extent, boredom and tiredness.
To begin, saying that it has little to do this film with its predecessor, the film starring Michael Keaton that was already of if something loose, whereupon, there were not many expectations from this sequel.A man looks at a restaurant and no apparent reason appears a stranger who kills with a pistol to his wife and his son and then commits suicide. To overcome it, you'll end up committing suicide, but they will save at last moment in the hospital. After this ECM (near death experience), he starts to notice and see strange things, and discovers that he is able to predict the death of a person through the aura that sees in them. It will soon begin to save lives on the brink of death, which will make you feel much better, but that ignores is that each life-saving brings terrible consequences.The idea of the film is not entirely bad, and might have given for something more than not be by a painful cheap TV address full of cheap and surplus embellishment, incapable of creating tension and interest during the footage. Patrick Lussier, is responsible for this mess, abuse scare easy and predictable at the same time, with the appearance of ghosts and bloody faces when he want, getting, come to some extent, boredom and tiredness.A shame as a harmful direction for a script which if it had found better director had been able to become somewhat correct, but does not pass of mediocre. I guess that the participation in the project of two actors on the rise as Nathan Fillion, the unforgettable captain of the Serenity, and Katee Scackhoff, the intrepid pilot of Galactica, has done that this sequel end premiered in theaters, rather than direct to DVD, which is where corresponded.
2,395
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1943
Iñaki Bilbao
El mejor hombre (The best man)
4
5
muchocine
A valuable degree skilfully by the Francoist regime. A work important, challenging, funny and interesting, which we stole in an era bygone but always threatening.
"Will take place the elections for President of the United States." And therein he will appoint the candidate of one of the parties. The chosen is a honest and honest man who seems to be the most appropriate. "" However, an opponent of his party, you want to post, start a smear campaign based on slander and lies to put an end to his reputation".""It has all the character of a dog except loyalty."Very good film, which did not release in the Spanish commercial theaters since we talk about democracy, with capital letters, in a time where this political system was absent in the Spanish State. But leaving this aside, the film is very well told, with impressive performances, especially of Henry Fonda, Cliff Robertson and Lee Tracy.Es interesting, entertaining and, in addition, has enormous value to know the ins and outs of the elections in the USA Very good picture in white and black, great direction of Schaffner, remember director of great works that have fallen into the history of cinema, as for example "the planet of the apes", capable of achieving very worthy and distressing scenes with many figures and many extras (all rallies, for example).A work important, challenging, funny and interesting, which we stole in an era bygone but always threatening.
2,396
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/437
Jose Contreras
La noche de los girasoles
2
5
muchocine
The error of conception is fat, but correctable in future films. It leaves behind style, love for details, and a strong pulse which speak of a good Narrator.
"The night of the sunflowers" is a film made up of twists. The good twists are a very stimulating rhetorical element, because they involve the participation of the spectator. Each spectator constantly anticipates the paths that can be followed from the plot, does it so because, without knowing it, every viewer is an expert in film, and an authority on the issue of gender. When a turn is made the viewer has to recapitulate and realize that their assumptions were wrong, the author has changed, without that you will notice, the gender, theme, the focus, the protagonist or another element. Someone should write an essay on the turns, because we like it or not, the twists have its rules, and I suspect that Sánchez-Cabezudo has skipped a very fat. You can not start a film with a feast of Hannibal Lecter and then turn our attention to a student topic as a teenager who wants to pretend it is not. There are issues too strong that impress too, and issues that require too much inner peace to mix them in a tortilla. Sánchez-Cabezudo begins his film with a soulless rapist, but it's a distraction, a decorative element, what I wanted was actually lecture on the obstruction of justice. The error is conception, fat, but correctable in future films, leaves behind style, love for details, and a pulse sign that they talk about a good Narrator.
2,397
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2762
Andrés Pons
Wolf Creek
4
5
muchocine
A real return to the 1970s where sick photography and the atmosphere created around the characters make this debut one of the greatest achievements of the horror of recent times.
GREG MCLEAN soon released another starring a giant crocodile horror film ROGUE debuted big with this work that comes with huge delay to our screens.Do not expect anything new, what counts saw him previously in works of great significance for the genre fans. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre or the hills have eyes among many others. The interpreters are young regulars at TV clamoring in his country that practically made their debut on the big screen. The merits of the debut not should seek interpretations or the script.Its true merits reside in the great management showing MCLEAN to create distress. The slow pace of the film is another of its strengths, by placing less action most certainly shocking moments-reaching.A real return to the 1970s where sick photography and the atmosphere created around the characters make this debut one of the greatest achievements of the horror of recent times.Hopefully the new work of the filmmaker to assess whether we are facing a new legend of the genre. 8.
2,398
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2916
Naty Buqué
El libro negro
2
5
muchocine
Black Book avoids Manichaeism implicated in many nazis with face of serial killers and a full of blessed resistance without difficulty, but brings this possibility to a mere surprise effect.
Do Black book,? inspired by real facts? (sic), follows the story of a Jewish Dutch (very nice, by the way) in the (endless) vicissitudes suffered during World War II, and beyond.In reality, what is said vicissitudes, not. Aristotle defines the Peripeteia as change of luck or situation of the characters, that fortune passed to misfortune or vice versa. In this case, everything that happens to our protagonist is moving from misfortune to the very same shit, and the very same shit to shit worse. And so many times more of what the Viewer is predisposed to see, in a film that does not understand what a blow low or how to avoid it (at times felt outrage that I undertook more or less by the second hour of against wind and tide, when the poor emily watson, the good woman of the universe)(, not only she was raped six times, he believes that her husband is dead, they treat it crazy, throw you stones, the priest accuses her of a bitch, but that also kill her seconds before that I could find that her husband was indeed alive and avoid his own death).(Turning) Black Book avoids Manichaeism implicated in many nazis with face of serial killers and a resistance full of Saints fallen on Earth without difficulty. But instead of that possibility carried an interesting reflection on the war, populism, charismatic leaders, fascism, biopolitics, the aestheticisation of politics, the place of women during the war, or any, but anything, the film becomes a banal film of suspense and mystery, of those that 10 minutes before the end to tell you who was the real killer (obviously)(which one least imagined). Black book is constructed as nine Queens or Scream. And the bad guys aren't necessarily Nazi, but have face of evil at the time reveal as such. In short, avoiding the obvious that the nazis are bad for a surprise effect.On the other hand, the film is a clear example of the typical structure yankeehollywood of historical movies where the plot depends on a grupete of protagonists, and the happy or sad, end of their respective destinations. And where course, such a fate should represent to some extent the fate of the people or social group to which the group belongs in fiction. I.e., in a film about World War II (where the doxa says that the good are allies) and the protagonists are a group of Jews or opponents of Hitler, the protagonist is most likely save, but will have to make many friends and family dead, because we all know that many Jews were killed in this conflict. Namely, the end, although the protagonist to be saved, it cannot be entirely happy, because it would be unethical. As in all film hollywood, even knowing that effectively killed thousands and thousands of people, our interest lies in our protagonists to be saved, and if that happens we stayed quiet. But as our protagonistan are the replacements of an entire social group, their destiny must represent to some extent to it. And if they represent Jews, we know that there will be blood. And incidentally, our social concern is transformed into one individual. I know all of these were killed but the cute blonde is saved (or not) and that is what matters.On the more technical side, should have warned the director that the music of Robocop is last fashion, and which is also not good put it in all the action of the film scenes. And to the inverosimilitudes to the hard to kill, where chance becomes almost magic, in a historical film, do not close at all (only reflection that opens the film I think that it is "Someone can have so much but so much bad luck?"). And when someone Unveils be bad you don't have to put face of Hannibal Lecter. And that corpses cremated in the foreground to begin a conclusive scene, relaxed, descenlace post climax, is not necessary (and unethical aesthetically).
2,399
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1778
Bloody Will
Diario de un escándalo
3
5
muchocine
Good film, with some fringe than another, but it leaves good taste, and with that I already have more than enough.
When a film opens already preceded by several nominations in the Oscars you biased that you aren't to any product whose quality you will discover as develops the footage. Original score, best adapted screenplay, best leading actress and best supporting actress, there is nothing, and after seeing?Diary of a scandal? their nominations are more than deserved. The film is basically an interpretative duel between two actresses showing their repeated nominations are not fruit of a momentary inspiration. Good film, with some fringe than another, but it leaves good taste, and with that I already have more than enough.If I allow a somewhat termism license, I would her call?Diary of Bridget bad?, but if we scratch something else we'll see the bad is not so bad, and the dead woolly has less moral than a white merchant. With a premise so warped as the relationship between a child and their teacher, the two protagonists weave one? society? of secrets where a takes advantage of the weakness of another, maintaining throughout history a characteristic of this type of friendly relations tension where? vouchers by which you shut up?, although the consequences following the breakup of one of the links are catastrophic.Sheba (Blanchett) is the teacher of new art in a London Institute whose most veteran teacher, Barbara Covett (Dench) has some predilection to engage in personal relationships with his colleagues based on the transmission of unspeakable secrets. When Sheba begins a relationship with a student in his class of 15 years, Barbara used the secret to handle it at its whim, always with the sword of damocles under his head. Needless to say, that veteran charged his revenge after a small snub committed by the child molester teacher.British cinema is one of the few that can treat pederasty with that so sophisticated and pompous. Unlike the rest of Europe, where we converted the story in a quandary amor-ley, this film makes a dilemma amor-suciedad. So stretched society cannot be so immoral, and Judi Dench becomes the diabolical witness to the ups and downs of his new friend. Do that? newspaper? the title is the book that writes Barbara with everything what happens around, and unlike the Bridget, his voice telling the miseries and secrets of those who surround it show us a bitter character but with sufficient hubris as to not be there.Thus, as the story we see as Barbara is doing with Sheba little by little, until that has it as already taken that you can do with his life, his family and their aspirations whatever you win, although the character of Blanchett not far behind. Drawn as a good history, we realize that it is as good or it is so innocent. Do with husband and two children, the teacher launches an own affair of?I am the Juani?, which he does not know, or rather you don't want to cut. Tell her friend seems the excuse a little more, but we do not quote, their actions are so heinous as the Dench.Si there is something that I did not like it might be precipitate that is desrrolla the relationship between the two. Do too soon to open the young professor to his? new? friend, and some inconsistencies regarding the relationship of Sheba with minors. It is what little I can highlight, and that as good a lover of movies with incessant dialogue, the rest I forgot a little.Interpretations can shortly tell apart from two nominations, which are more than reason enough to give you account that these two women soloists are enough to carry the film from beginning to end with the looks and gestures. Do the chemistry is undeniable, and that relationship between mother daughter or at times loving is interpreted in a masterly manner taking into account the ups and downs that run in your? friendship? peculiar. Attentive to the final scene of encounter between the two, when things end up saying to the face. It is simply to record and display it in the schools of interpretation. Bill Nighy is the man in the film, but is on the floor next to these two ladies.?Diary of a scandal? It is these films showing how cabr ** s can be sometimes when we eat the loneliness and need to the esclavito turn to the side. It is human nature, gather information if it can be thrown in the future. One we stayed in only thoughts, others materialized it in the most direct way. Here, Judi Dench, is the last.By the way, the poster is clavadito to the of?Do talk to her? in version? opposite?.