Unnamed: 0 int64 0 3.88k | id stringlengths 44 47 | autor stringclasses 181 values | title stringlengths 2 71 | rank int64 1 5 | maxRank int64 5 5 | source stringclasses 1 value | summary stringlengths 9 396 | body stringlengths 352 24.4k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,500 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4085 | Heitor Pan | Bitelchús | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Burton manages to have a desire to mad by giving us a tour of the another world or find us a couple of ghosts as close friends. | The directorial debut of Tim Burton big scare, we'll be with the work made to start to fall in love of the unique universe of this film Platypus.Back in 1986, after the premiere of "The Pee-Wee's big adventure" and su - for me entirely inexplicable - blockbuster in Usamérica, Burton had begun to work on a screenplay for the Warner on a possible adaptation of Batman for the big screen, but the project had not just receive total support from the company.At the same time, the director was looking for some script to adapt to their tastes, in order to build his second feature film, with very little fortune. Until, after a few years, it has reached your hands one written by Michael McDowell with the strange title "Beatlejuice" (later translated in our country as "Bitelchús"). As if by magic, the story concentrated imaginative way you discover with the passage of time as the great obsessions of the director: the death, the duality between the friendly world of ghosts and frightening and scary real world, eccentric and/or marginalized protagonists and the ability to innovate with special effects that knew to move their unique ideas from his bustling mind until the Viewer. Later, once the film, would also Visual elements that are repitirían over his filmography as a black and white striped costumes, models, cemeteries or if you look at the scene in which Betelgeuse appears with a hat shaped carousel, can see until Jack Skellington head atop.The creation of the final screenplay was a long and complicated process. The writer himself, Michael McDowell, along with a second writer, began trying to give shape to the kooky comedy full of unlikely characters and without defined structure, in addition to the own Burton trying to give their own vision and continued with the hiring of a third writer. But the true personality of Betelgeuse arose when Michael Keaton entered the draft and connected in full with the personality of the director. The charisma, sense of humour, improvisation, the taste for parody and Keaton energy were the true architects of the great character of the film and one of their greatest successes.The story of starting the tape is simple. A couple living in a huge House has an accident returning from the village and dies. From then on, converted into ghosts will be forced to adapt to his new situation, unable to leave his home and attempting to take to a family of yuppies coming from the city that can make his long eternal wait even more endless.In their excursions into the world of the dead know the bureaucracy of the other world, the catastrophic consequences of suicide to the bio-Exorcist hooligan, most irreverent, I marrano and ironic another sphere, or already in the living, eventually making friends with the daughter of the new inhabitants of the House, an adolescent depressive and trends suicide performed by Winona Ryder.En film Burton gives rein to his fertile imaginationghostly transformations are as grimosas as hilarious, the world of Hades is full of flat strangers and impossible perspectives and possessions become - as you said one of the characters - the experience in an amusement park. Burton manages to have a desire to mad by giving us a tour of the another world or find us a couple of ghosts as close friends.But above all, it is the powerful interpretation of a Michael Keaton full and tireless. A whirlwind that gives life to a unique, intimate and detestable character in equal parts, capable of being cruel in a fun way. A character who, despite not appearing in long sections of the film, steals the prominence to the rest of the actors in a disproportionate manner.Again, Burton chose Danny Elfman to compose the soundtrack, and as is the case with the director, Elfman shows its true potential composing a "score" as appropriate and resounding that turns into a character more than the movie.Ultimately, Burton second intrusion in the feature film was the confirmation of the director and, for some spectators, including myself, the beginning of an unwavering devotion to his filmography. |
2,501 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4358 | Bruji | Juno | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A new Cinderella called dance of the Oscars. Their weapons to conquer: the performance of Ellen Page and revision of the dramatic comedies of good intentions. | The fall of the Flashbacks and the voices in Off seems be that the director and screenwriter of "Thank you for smoking" does not want to miss the newest techniques of contemporary cinema. It sometimes feels that many of the filmmakers of new batch, even those who have raised between cameras like him, they forget (if you ever knew) what emerged and how to use the aforementioned inventions. In the case before us, the first-, fortunately, relampagueantes falshbacks - are extremely repetitive, with a dangerous approach to the graphic description of characters that Todd Field tried to in games secrets and which, according to the criterion of who says the film, only worked under the direction of Vincent Minelli in an American in Paris. The latter, voice-overs, are employed by way of notes on blog TV series, as it could not be otherwise knowing the curriculum of the novelist. And is that it is enough with a brief reading of the career of Mrs. Devil (screenwriter of fashion in the USA, discovered by a film producer while his literary hand Internet) to seriously rethink door give the 190 and take seriously that write. Only that, for now, I know not how dealt with a history of social court saying nothing. The winter of the good intentions in Juno, Goddess of motherhood in mythology Roman and, unfortunately, a far cry from the powerful Aphrodite of Woody Allen-, not only no space or place to pay tribute to the above-mentioned not to focus on the problems for teenage pregnancies, either to establish approximations or connections with the situation of infertile marriages, or even to make prevail the fundamental rights of the child, target priority of any civilized society; entering failing in an unreal universe of good intentions that never were so little disputed. A fact clearly reprehensible to modern American criticism, which in other times of similar lack of criterion not him trembled pulse to tar naive to Frank Capra, lawyer of the goodness inherent in the human being at a time in which all the well-intentioned thoughts knew little to alleviate the effects of the great depression. In 2007, date of the present production, the only pending overcome depression comes from the amazement that causes the obsession of American cinema to include independent films of low budget nominations, eliminating unfairly red carpet Kodak Theatre to large scripts as American Gangster, or directors such as Tim Burton or Ridley Scott.La spring of the classic American comedies the new Cinderella called dance of the Oscar will compete with a purported review of the classic comedies in American, losing in an unobtrusive approach that pursues and fails social satire, emulating the fast and sharp dialogues of the screwball comedy, and even with the intention to ridicule the male characters as the Howard Hawks film. The difference is that the creation of special situations aimed at this end, whereas in Juno, the boys are already ridiculous series was necessary in this. Against the independent status of females which move to music coup "indie", able to take responsible decisions even with sixteen, are immature future father adoptive, confined in a box of memories, and the young sportsman who asked if a pregnancy is that which happens to moms and women teachers. Go to...often exemplary. If in a gesture of good will (and considerable effort) the viewer decides to join the optimistic message that motivates the actions of the plot and left drag by the positive spirit of a romantic comedy without more pretensions, it will soon discover that the script, typically American, alternates various comments of undeniable wit, aimed to draw a slight smile, with a multitude of jokes from the worst galas of Billy Crystal. Those and those in which a lively audience (American) applauds enthusiastically, while this albaceteña stays as it was; to put the icing with the malicious tendency of Americans to taunt other cultures. Difficult is that a society which is announced in the newspapers to be parents will understand that China will not give children as if they were ipot. If, on the other hand, someone tries to repair in the central axis of the plot, will fall into the account that what there called "private adoptions", without government regulation?, and possible financial compensation, looks suspiciously like a sale of puppies, unthinkable in the Asian country the mocked. Summer a great interpretation despite listed everything, it is undeniable that the tape get transmit tenderness and warmth from the striking opening credits, enhancing parental relations filiares inherent to Jason Reitman film, and with a priceless lesson (i.e. American films) who is a mother. Remember, the role of Allison Janney and the relationship that is established between the protagonists. But, above all, be sure that Juno attends the birth of a new Star: the witch Ellen Page. Do not lack reason critics already her comparing with Meryl Streep, both are able to save a mediocre film, making credible a bad script. |
2,502 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3882 | Ivan Villamel | First Snow (La primera nevada) | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Mark Fergus chooses for his baptism of fire in the area of the film a claustrophobic history not so much space, but of emotions, with highly satisfactory results | Close to the independent spirit of can be described as the opera premium Mark Fergus, filmmaker best known for his work as a screenwriter, not only in his debut on the big screen logically, with excellent results in his best script developed to date, "Children of men", one of the best productions of science fiction in recent yearsin which he worked closely with the director of that film, Alfonso Cuarón, and several other writers. On this occasion, Mark Fergus chooses for his baptism of fire in the area of the film a claustrophobic history not so much space, but of emotions, with highly satisfactory results.The story shows how Jimmy Starks, the perfect prototype of perfect ruthless seller without scruples that would to sell their products, hangs in the middle of one of their small villages of the American Midwest road, when your car has problems, and should stay a few hours until they fix it to go home. There awaits Deirdre, his girlfriend, unfamiliar in the evolution of the events that mark a before and a later in the life of your absent partner. When Jimmy (moved more by curiosity than the belief) comes to a man that has the supposed ability to see the future, and has their place of work in an old caravan just the side of the bar where Jimmy spends the hours waiting for your car, do not imagine that a series of premonitions are fulfilled and should even raise the credibility of such claims. One of these visions greatly, marks a fact of their future which can make you tragically and against which becomes obsessed since then.Mark Fergus moves with ease in an area predominantly close to the American thriller, one in which secondary roads, talks of bars road and characters without direction or destination, mark the narrative and the development of the characters. His screenplay is consistent and develop away from clichés or turns of script in order to provoke a false surprise effect, but nevertheless move forward with strength the narration of the story. His mise en scène is conventional and with a certain formal distance, which gives the film a visual appearance suitable for the story to tell us. For its part, the work of the actors is something irregular, perhaps by the own intended emotional estrangement to develop throughout history from a point of view outside the emotions of the characters, with the exception of our main character, Jimmy Starks, starring Guy Pearce, that great actor someday will be recognized as it should (extraordinary incidentally in the magistral "Memento")If it conveys its harrowing fight against their own destiny with a superb characterization. Of the rest of the actors, mention to certain side as the visionary himself or the sick mother of his old childhood friend, that with few lines of dialogue are perfect in their role. The rest of the cast moves in a certain predictability, especially the character of Deirdre, played by the beautiful Piper Perabo, that is limited to show off Palm as the vase prototype of women who populate certain films of the genre.Film multiple readings, especially in regards to the way as we face our destiny, or failing that, the development of the present to have one. As escape from our destination, which makes bloom in our inner fears and ghosts of the past, creating therefore an unhealthy obsession that can be a burden in the present, to the point of becoming puppets of a destination that only provides fragility that is afraid. A way of penetrating the human mind and our own fears.In addition, the metaphorical vision of the typical American secondary road, seen in this film as solitary, aseptic places, lifeless, as the present and the future that seems to wait for this group of losers whose lives take place without a fixed direction, towards a road loss with echoes of any character in the films of David Lynch. Perhaps there lies the great virtue of the film, but which in turn may be the scourge that's ruined with any intention of reaching all kinds of audiences, the film runs slow and leisurely, coldly, like that first snowfall expected so afraid Jimmy. In short, a great film with great virtues and few defects, including the fact mentioned earlier of his alleged coldness, which sometimes can move away from the intentions and motivations of the characters. To a server not him was problem no waiting with tense calm development of events. Notable film that is close in its intentions and development, although a step below, with another great little film aired recently, name "The Lookout", and not just with the comparison made by way of false advertising for this film "Memento", which only has the similarity of count Guy Pearce in the performance, and its uncertain future in fiction. |
2,503 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/445 | Kiko de España | Grizzly man | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Portrait of a sunken man who spent thirteen years between bears. The best documentary of the year and probably one of the best three films. | Impressive documentary of the German director who tells the late Timothy Treadwell, a freak who spent thirteen years among bears, making the streams. Almost all of the footage is video file of this character, who wanted to live among his brothers bears denying the man who hated.He died torn apart and devoured by a bear that did not want to make friend with his wife. At the beginning of the documentary, we believe that the such Treadwell was a nice guy seeking twinning with nature, but as they pass the minutes almost us we identify most (including the director) with those who claimed that he was like a watering can. I've seen is a portrait of a sunken man (attention to the key that gives his own father in the interview with Herzog) lost the head with drugs and drink. Moments of superhuman beauty, as the first contact with the Fox, go hand in hand of others really frightening (from the statements of the coroner to the duel of bears, the sequence of the fateful attack, including Herzog shivering is to listen to the audio track, recorded in the House of the victim) to achieve the best documentary of the year and probably one of the three best movies. 9. |
2,504 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2597 | Silvia Giner | Los Simpson: La Película | 4 | 5 | muchocine | With the exception of the first words of Maggie, the film adds nothing new, in fact could be one chapter of TV, that if it is never others enjoy on-screen great something we like. | It is difficult to write about the most famous family of the planet without be carried away by feelings minted during the 20 years of its existence. While many think that it is stupid to go to the cinema to see something that can be seen on TV, it is not less certain that there are more who support the release of this film entirely necessary for the animation world and that certainly it worth seeing.All those who were concerned by the new voice of Homer in his voice to the Spanish, I have to give them a plamadita of relief on the back because the voice in cinema it not worthy at all nor has nothing to miss the previous.With the exception of the first words of Maggie, the film adds nothing new, in fact could be one chapter of TV, that if it is never others enjoy on-screen great something we like. The movie doesn't disappoint, I think it is very unbecoming and manages to make us laugh a lot.I want to highlight the "Spider Pig" time, which for me is one of the best of the movie, in fact if you stay to see the closing credits (is where you can see Maggie speak) look at the song of closure is that of Spider-man but Tuneada and coroso them say "Spider Pig, Spider Pig" XD, very good if Mr.No mistake, the real movie prota, it is the silly piggy.What seems to me a very intelligent move is how they have used the characters and the typical gags to make subliminal marketing on "that is worth going to the cinema to see something q can see on TV" (example: the q tells Homer to the beginning or the little signs announcing the programming of the Fox), it could be despicable, but they can afford it. |
2,505 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4232 | Francisco Bellón | 4 meses, 3 semanas y 2 días | 3 | 5 | muchocine | 4 Months, 3 weeks, 2 days is a good film showing the agony of the regime of Ceauçescu but that is far from being the great masterpiece that gives to understand his Palmarès. | 4 Months, 3 weeks, 2 days may perhaps be the most award-winning movie of all 2007 worldwide, and is that in all the festivals or awards that has competed, it has devastated. To this great success, which will certainly benefit greatly the development and promotion of Romanian Cinema, it must be added the great reception from international critics.All of this creates great excitement around the film, and it may be very counterproductive, because it tends to be difficult to match expectations. It is almost impossible to not be influenced by these sensations, and consciously to the film of Christian Mungiu is required more than we. That feeling is soon replaced by a slight disappointment, and is that the rhythm to which the story is told difficult which the viewer immerse himself in it. History it is also true that it takes to boot, and the initial half-hour goes unsuccessfully engage and excite the Viewer. However, when Mungiu makes it clear that the issue of abortion is a mere pretext to show how it was Romania's Communist regime, the film is gaining in height and film quality. Mungiu portrays very well the double standards prevailing in that society, the fear and the desire for freedom of a people, the oppression and monitoring continuous of a regime in the last sentenced to a disappearance that would still take a couple of years. In his eagerness to seek the realism, the film is sometimes explicit, and loses intensity with the long and questionable levels sequence in which they go to the protagonist wandering down a hallway or streets desiertas.4 months, 3 weeks, 2 days is a good movie showing the agony of the regime of Ceauçescu but that is far from being the great masterpiece that gives to understand his Palmarès. He would have won more if Mungiu had chosen another pretext to an illegal abortion. |
2,506 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2128 | Iñaki Bilbao | Hombres desesperados (Winnetou und sein Freund Old Firehand) | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It is poor, but funny. They are not Granger, nor Barker, but it is Cameron, a likeable actor who in the 1940s and 1950s made some good tough cowboy roles. Funny script. Beautiful Yugoslav landscapes. | "The dreaded Bandit Cyrus is willing to annoy both the peaceful inhabitants of a section of the people of the West Indian Winnetou." "This, with the help of his inseparable friend Old Firehand, will seek to prevent it".Continuation of the sympathetic adventures of the Indian Winnetou and his friend Old Firehand, entertaining adaptations of the immortal works of Karl May. Here, the reins of the film is in German hands, so the quality down considerably. It is poor, but funny. They are not Granger, nor Barker, but it is Cameron, a likeable actor who in the 1940s and 1950s made some good tough cowboy roles. Funny script. Beautiful Yugoslav landscapes. |
2,507 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1165 | Tito Chinchan | Karate Kid | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Essential film about overcoming, respect for elders, tenacity, and other values quite forgotten by society. It may seem a little pastelón, but at the time it certainly marked a generation. | There are many people who say that television is a shit and they never give interesting programmes. I do not think so, but if it is true that the amount of ads is that I think much before I venture to see a movie on TV. There are good programs and often can see films already print of all the sites. And one of these was Karate Kid, at Christmas I took to the small, which in what he was to his roll, I I saw for the umpteenth time Larusso and Miyagi giving wax and polishing wax. That if the final scene saw her gaining knowledge to defend in the nursery.The film is a teenage boy who moves to a new town with her mother. Total, in his eagerness to make friends is approaching the girl more beautiful of the area. Of course, this already is being courted by the cool more cool of the locality, which coincidentally is a bloody teenager karateka, so her tanned back. In these, when it is about to collapse the poor Daniel, discovers that the waiter of the tasks where lives (has no less than 60 years) knows something of karate, by what begins teachings, without much faith. what I'm going to tell you a movie they have spare a few thousand times? So many things. To start regardless of the quality of the same, created a very interesting trend and many other titles have followed. The films of the Court "new kid gets to bad girl, did you this and the new has to fight against all to achieve the girl and save his own skin". On the other hand, this film caused a great impact on our young lives, who did not say pulil cela, cela dal? Do or who has not repeated until nausea the gesture of the garza with mixed results? Many things pra are one movie.In short, essential film about overcoming, respect for elders, tenacity, and other values quite forgotten by society. It may seem a little pastelón, but at the time it certainly marked a generation.Moments to remember: when Miyagi tells Daniel San, with a huge row of cars, the concept "give wax - polishing wax".When leaving the House floor nickel, explains that he has served all."Miyagi leathers them the lomo at the Cobras.""Knee" tells the bad teacher.Healing which makes Miyagi Daniel.La kick from the crane in the final scene. |
2,508 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/790 | Sara Rodriguez | Casablanca | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Never happens fashion and still falling in love with anyone who sees. | The time: the second world war. Place: Casablanca, a city of easy access but almost impossible to leave, especially if your name is on the list of the most persecuted by the nazis. As it is the case of Victor Laszlo (Paul Henreid), who comes to Casablanca hoping that Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bogart), the owner of the "Rick's Cafe" help, a man who is not at risk by nadie.salvo by Ilsa (Ingrid Bergman).Almost all know what is Casablanca, some, even her they have seen several times and you know some of the memorable phrases that shines the immense Bogart in the film (excluding that of "play it again, Sam" made famous by a Woody Allen film xD). It has been described as a legend of Hollywood, a jewel, whose value increases as time passes.But why us Casablanca both like?It is a love story that has a historical context thousand times brought to the screen in the history of the cinema and we will have seen in more recent productions, best special effects, a spectacular photography (clear that the filming in black-and-white insurance that limits a bit xD) and incredible locations outside studies. However, Casablanca was filmed entirely in the Warner studios in 1941, with a total budget of $870,000 (which today would not give nor to pay the second Assistant of any superstar self-respecting.), in an era in which addition, actors not chose their roles, they signed contracts with producers to make a certain number of films and were those that chose for them, although most them was worth the actors not put stick if they wanted to see legs in the street.On the other hand, none of those involved in Casablanca was too confident in it, they thought that it was only a film study more.In fact, George Craft (chosen by Michael Curtiz after rejecting other applicants for not giving the carving to embody a tough guy), rejected the role of Rick Blaine that he had no interest in participating in a production of this type with the unknown (until then) Swedish actress Ingrid Bergman. It was a big mistake for Craft and a great success for Bogart (the seventh candidate of casting), which led him to play the role which would give the film "Eternity". Apart from the casting, there were many more problems that even make jeopardized the nearly million dollars which cost the film as bad English of Michael Curtiz and the complicated relationship of the Epstein brothers, responsible for the adaptation of the screenplay based on the play theatrical "Everybody comes to Rick's" or the question that actors often came to the set without knowing what dialogue played them that day.And, although it may not be the prototype of modern sex symbol Humphrey Bogart (also moved away enough of the canons of beauty of the era) or that I had to shoot the scenes with Bergman uploaded to a platform of 23 cm. compesar the portentous 20 cm. that it happened, but it is with the rough voice of Bogarthis eyes deep, almost abysmal and his overwhelming presence did not take much more. Also maybe the modest Ingrid Bergman, in this film is away from the typical "femme fatale", but it is undeniable that there is a palpable chemistry in each one of their scenes together and acting power of this production is one of its strengths.Therefore, Casablanca is a film that never happens fashion and that still falling to anyone who sees. |
2,509 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1588 | Rafa Martín | The host | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Relatively recommended, and with some other genuine fright and good suspense, although it seems rather a mere excuse to criticize, criticize and criticize. | Her have been sold as a horror movie, but this film no way to sell it. Part homage to Alien, part social commentary, part environmental discourse, part comedy, The Host is one of those movies that aims to be more than what it really is (a film with bug, for God's sake) and that takes all the prizes in all the festivals because the filmmaker is called Smith, or Pérez, but Bong Joon-Ho, author of the fucking great Memories of Murder, by what this film really worth that is entertaining and has momentazo but isn't bad, has been elevated to the category of resurrection of the genus (without knowing that it has already taken place and is called The Descent).Total, the thing starts when a doctor (American) tells his lackey (South Korean) cast forty gallons of formaldehyde into the River have. Five minutes later, in the middle of a quiet park and in full light of day, appears the bug in question: a trout with legs and teeth as my arm of long dedicated to make picadillo a halfway and carried the other to his hideout in the sewers. Among the abducted is the infant daughter of Park Kang-Du, a young newsagent who has the misfortune of being stupid and rescue from the clutches of the monster girl is not (the side which makes when he realizes is priceless). Together with his family that included his father, owner of the business, its Executive brother and sister champion of archery, rush to the hunting of the bug to a brutal pace for an hour and a half. Then the movie realizes it is pigeonholing, and as this is very bad, check the hand brake, what pisses us off living.Do because even more or less that hour and a half goes like silk, with sequences very entertaining as the flight of the family of the hospital where quarantined, and dominated by the humor? eccentric? and that both like Mondosonoro, for example, carried his characters a liar to wafers in half of a funeral for the victims. In Memories Of Murder humor works by making a parody the futility of the security forces. Here is to make grace to make. And that do not see as it distracts. Obviously The Host has ambitions, and today the height of the film with claims is to attack American politics, what seems very well provided that you do not a film with bug. If're going you to do, do it as do the Japanese with this metaphor of the Hiroshima bomb which is Godzilla, not to a diabolical scientist (Paul Lazar, the cross-eyed entomologist of the silence of the Lambs) that lacks only two horns, the Trident and the tail.So just after a splendid scene of hunting (family, stuck, waiting for the bug in a cabin), the thing for fifteen minutes or thing, where is tells us that the only way to act is to use Agent Orange (especially despicable chemical weapon) to put an end to the bug. And there are demonstrations of ecologists, and social criticism, and more pana to United States (that being there in Seoul as fifty years, what makes you be logical for the South Korean Viewer, not for me, I want a movie with bug).The case is that The Host is very well directed (what levels is removed, the very mamón). Trout with legs sing much, but is to be welcomed that the director does not play with the shadows, with light or with the blows of effect. The monster causes fear because we do not know what it is capable, we know that can resist, nor we know how you can end up with him, not because we do not see. Boon shows more than suggests, but is so skillful that it gets through the obstacle without any problems. As actors, to highlight the protagonist, Song Kang Ho, very correct in his role of alelao and the girl who plays his daughter and that is carrying the weight of the suspense of the film (his attempt to escape from the monster, which at that time is asleep, is the second great scene of the film). Of the others, because it's always. So meet. is there. Like many by its depth, and for his attempt to deal with a multitude of issues. But when I go with the "horror movie" chip put in my head, I prefer more direct things, and I would have apetecido more something pure and simple gender. In any case, relatively recommended, and with some other genuine fright and good suspense, although it seems rather a mere excuse to criticize, criticize and criticize. Americans know, I thing, you know. They are bad. Leave them in peace. And give me more I bug. |
2,510 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2589 | Kiko de España | Planet Terror | 3 | 5 | muchocine | However, it is difficult to resist Rose McGowan dancing in a bar with miniskirt, so the thing well, starts to view once you discover that it is not to be the specialty of the House? | If I'm honest I have to admit that I only like two movies of the tejano, El Mariachi and The Faculty.El rest of his filmography has good jokes (Desperado), bad jokes (the Mexican), child film saga (Spy Kids or Sharkboy and Lavagirl), remakes of remakes (open until dawn) and noir with verbiage (Sin city). Is therefore very normal for Planet Terror, after a second viewing, is almost the best movie of its director for a server.Of time begins with Machete, that would even be better to imagining what you, an orgy of violence and blood, a feast as bright as shabby, a joy that perhaps should not filming or at least to shoot new scenes "big", because I've already seen the movie in the trailer. Anyway, as I say, it's great.However, it is difficult to resist Rose McGowan dancing in a bar with miniskirt, so the thing well, starts to view once you discover that it is not to be the specialty of the House?Stooges military, a lethal virus and a lot of old-school-horror in the form of makeup and LaTeX into action while introduces us to the distant marriage Block, are going to live a night of nightmare.It would be a stupidity which I was one of the many brilliant film moments, so I'm not going to. It isn't at the height of Death Proof, but it would be very (very) unfair to throw it on face, because this is something else. By the way, the trailer for Machete if that is, say it above, those that aren't are the other three? |
2,511 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/93 | Tito Chinchan | El castillo ambulante | 4 | 5 | muchocine | With Chihiro comparisons are odious | The film is a teenage girl who works sombrerera. A good day to go out on the streets, her assails a bolting and mysterious boy, who is pursued by some amorphous creatures of black and hat. After flying fleeing the pursuers, she returns to his tent, where awaiting a kind of fat lady. This, after angry with the kid, spear a spell which turns into old woman, forcing her to look for Howl so that can remove you the enchantment. So explained it appears to be very rare, but it is not so much.Well, it's always very curradas animations and nice stories. What I liked most is that the girl, turn to old woman, leads him with all naturalness, saving us the expected interval in which strives to become young again. The characters are quite curious, having a devil of the fire that hides a secret, a scarecrow with turnip head, a child who is the only normal, fat witch, which is then dehydrated and seems Jabba the Hut (on the war of the galaxies), the own Howl that the infighting that brings is not very well known and the teenager - old which has its thing. The story returns to the style of Laputa Castle or spirited away, not coming to be as good as the last but better than the of Laputa.Resumiendo, which if you are tremendous fans of the saga, you will like much, but expect to take her by fascicles and the compreis with a film manga than ever you will see. I personally, from my point of view of fan, recommend her strongly. To the kid may like it, although you can give something of fear. |
2,512 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1522 | Iñigo | Inland empire | 5 | 5 | muchocine | David Lynch is bringing to the true David Lynch: the new film has spawned. | Are not few those who say that David Lynch is you cannot only against a project: it desatará the box of Thunder, will do what your mind and your intuition dictate you, the universe itself will become a chaos where the slightest piece order will become a threat, Anatomy-spatial logic will be removed from the dictionarya new concept of cinema will emerge even.That is, neither more nor less, what has made the genius of Montana. It shattered completely celluloid, considered according to him "a dinosaur" slow and heavy, and it has reinvented itself all entered judgment creating a new stage (necessary and future) "film".Digital freedom that both worships the prolific filmmaker notes, and in what way, "INLAND Empire". Their personal traits, their non-transferable items, everything what characterized the Lynch film seen here transported to its maximum expression. Ago, for the first time, he really wants to do.Even more. Exceeds all limits of expressions. He becomes the classifiable (which was already little part of his film) unclassifiable. Born the metacine, the film within the film, movies in the movies. The film is life, life is cinema. And it arrives the moment in which it is impossible to discern which is which.Therefore, this new movie will largely increase (if possible) the gap between the followers/analytical Lynch film and those who do not understand their behaviour or despise him: those who see in his recent work an anthological joke or an obvious insertion in the world of hard drugs.Now, that gap is insurmountable. It unsettles or wonder. This is the end.But never him has gone head to the good of Lynch, and not intended to take the hair. Maybe the only thing that makes is parody of itself. And, in the same way, it embeds many details that serve as a reference to his previous film. Gives the impression that farewell something, probably your 35 mm, to make way for a new life: the digital life. An era which starts very unevenly, even with hope, joy, or messing.There are allusions, as I have said, to "Road lost", to "Mulholland Drive", to "Twin Peaks", even moments necessarily deepen as "Darkened Room" or "Rabbits".It is go much further than "Mulholland Drive", introduce himself, through an enormous Laura Dern, on Hollywood Boulevard to terrify him, breaking with their reality and their fears.Through narrow, dark, oppressive corridors (remember extensively to the "Lost Highway"), the search for oneself will be undertaken. The actress in search of the person. The person looking for the actress. And without knowing how or when, both will be merged being impossible to return to reality or identify her.There are certain issues that seem to recall to the "Videodrome" by Cronenberg, but here all those details will be swallowed up by the universe of Lynch, understanding the mystery better than the same Hitchcock brought beyond the border between good and evil, between madness and sanity: between fiction and the substantivity.Without influencing the script (or relativity of the same), what makes here Lynch is kill the film, kill an era in which there is no complicity between director and spectator, between dream and life, between mystery and Rapture, between death and rebirth.Arises what was once, what should have resurfaced some time ago. The path to the real meaning of the big screen.You can sit, overwhelm you, stop the heart with the brutal tension, try to find the mystery and sense, vanish you, let you carry, interpret, let him do, cry, illusion you, break you, terrorize you. You can look at that huge screen and see you reflected, discover the new life within life, know that the protagonist are only you and that salvation will be subject only to you.It is, in fact, what happens to the film. Everything depends on us, that we are not mere Guinea Pigs subject to laughter easy, waiting in the purgatory of the fable, discreet hideaway of the infierno.¿Ser or not to be? Have or not have? Blasfemias.David Lynch, ignoring those who branded the work as complex madness, gives a new meaning (lost to the "INLAND EMPIRE") to film. It gives life to the film. He sacrifices himself with a knife in the stomach, so it forcibly vomits to engender the seventh modern (and ancient) art.David Lynch, the only genius in life, creates the first latent in our big screen masterpiece: its artistic peak. |
2,513 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/324 | Jeremy Fox | Piratas del Caribe 2 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Entertaining tape of adventures that he possesses the same virtues and suffers from the same defects than its predecessor. | I have been able to attend a special pass which will be, in all likelihood, the highest grossing film of the year worldwide: "Pirates of the Caribbean: the chest of the dead man" (do Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man? s Chest) of Gore Verbinsky.En the film continue attending, almost at the same point where we left them, the adventures featuring Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp)Will Turner (Orlando Bloom) and Elisabeth Swann (Keira Knightley).I have to admit that during the first hour of projection I thought that we could be one of the jewels of the year. Because the film starts very well, with a lot of pace and a very fun; but unfortunately later things only get worse and the pace drops a bit. Sobran whole passages were not necessary at all, and once again, we have another case of confusion between the spectacular and the spectacular. To achieve an exciting duel to swords it is not necessary to place it at the top of a Ferris wheel, that is spectacular, what we need to do is roll it so it is exciting. But of course, it is much more difficult and would possibly make the film a product much more than "for all ages" intended by its managers, who do not seek anything else, no mistake, that raise the most money possible.Why is sometimes lost time in telling the story branches that do not contribute anything except a divertidilla fight or a comic situation (almost always something child), to the detriment of others who explained us better the motivations of the characters, and that would be more exciting some of its decisions. There are moments, dialogues and situations calling out more emotion but that they may not have either because some actors not can give it either because for that moment was exciting should have prepared for him beforehand. And as I said, that erode you commercial potential to the tape.I would also do some "slight" changes in the cast. First Keira Knightley is not the ideal actress to play an indomitable woman of adventurous spirit; It does not simply type. But even accepting that, it is unbelievable that a woman with that character was fell in love with a type with the cowardly aspect of Orlando Bloom (and that original version improves). Luckily to compensate for the acting balance we have people such as Stellan Skarsgård and Bill Nighy that despite working almost in anonymity due to makeup or special effects applied to his face, made interpretations over the appointed two protagonists.Now that I mention it I would say that the film is technically impeccable and very impressive would have to see here at end of season so we disagree to the oscar for best visual effects over the next year.Johnny Depp, a great interpretation capable of dramatic, comedic performances, it deserves special mention contained or exaggerated. An actor who works happy on a tightrope and carried out here again a great interpretation of one of its most popular characters. Without it everything else no sense. He is the comedy, he is the drama, he is the adventure. Jack Sparrow is the film.In short, for me, the film has the same virtues and suffers from the same defects than its predecessor. It's an entertaining tape of adventures that will make the delights of all kinds of audiences and to provide two and a half hours fun viewers, especially to the less demanding, that is no bad. However to those able to enjoy large tapes of adventures of all times it is possible pyrotechnics know you little. |
2,514 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1108 | Jeremy Fox | Eragon | 1 | 5 | muchocine | On the other hand it has the virtue of not being excessively long, barely lasting one hour and three quarters, or pretentious so as entertainment for a later silly could be worth. View group and with willingness to laugh of it, for sure to improve. | Queire worldwide take advantage of the success and the desire of fantasy film by Christmas, created by "The Lord of the rings" saga. That is why the past Christmas Mariah "The Chronicles of Narnia", which threatens to turn into a quite long serial, and this Christmas we have received this "Eragón" of which we have the consolation that there are only three novels. "There go getting used, that it will not be the last film in the same style we get.""Eragon" represents the debut in the direction of Stefen December, former Visual effects supervisor. And tenor as seen it seems clear that his adventure has been, when less, little fortunate. The address is very flat, lacks life, personality and because of him, the film lacks the claw and the force should be.It is not that the script was wonderful, because it is ultimately a remix of elements of "The Lord of the rings" and "Star Wars", but with a powerful direction would have been otherwise. At least, maybe not he had crappy what looks, terrible detail in a film that is sold as a Christmas blockbuster full of special effects and heiress of milestones such as those already mentioned.Fortunately Jeremy Irons through there and offers us some time in charismatic, average gas performance because her character does not give much, but higher than his teammates. Djimon Hounsou and John Malkovich spend out there but little seen, while Robert Carlyle sees more but the truth is that it is a tad embarrassing.What is a total disaster is the choice of Edward Speleers as main actor. The kid is a bully, it cannot be denied, but acting is not theirs. It is difficult to understand that a woman as the played by Sienna Guillory might be interested by such little thing (for some reason from the first moment he sees, look you as if it were to brush there same). The main actor Dragon acts better than him is so bad.On the other hand it has the virtue of not being excessively long, barely lasting one hour and three quarters, or pretentious so as entertainment for a later silly could be worth. View group and with willingness to laugh of it, for sure to improve. |
2,515 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4089 | Andrés Pons | Solstice | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A credit needed in this very correct Solstice arrives with a new release for the home market. | If I say DANIEL MYRICK? Sound them of something? Probably not much or practically nothing, if I say that it was one of the authors of the blair witch project? Surely sound them far more. Something really inexplicable both disappeared after performing with Eduardo Sánchez, which without doubt is the most profitable film in the history of the cinema. Lately it seems reborn from its ashes by Eduardo Sánchez reappeared with the magnificent ALTERED. Meanwhile Daniel was crashing with the entire team in BELIEVERS an ill-fated production on sects released directly to DVD.A credit needed in this very correct SOLSTICE arrives with a new release for the home market. Relying on interpreters to begin his career with the gorgeous ELIZABETH HARNOIS, known in the United States for his role in the series ONE TREE HILL, providing the veterania the sheriff psychopath of the massacre of Texas 2003 LEE ERMEY.All great in characters who have a good development in a film that moves more between the drama and intrigue with touches of apparitions, this very well run on the strength of the script with the launch of very correct scene, technically despite the low budget are really notable in all its aspects.A good film of psychological horror, burdened by a somewhat hasty end even if leave you a good taste. |
2,516 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1738 | Francisco Bellón | Las Vacaciones de Mr. Bean | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Vacation Mr. Bean is a comedy that meets perfectly its task: to pass a very fun time viewers. | There are some characters that without knowing very well why, become true icons without borders, and there is no doubt that Mr. Bean is one of them. Despite his limited appearance in television (only 18 episodes in 5 years), the character became very popular and catapulted to fame to his interpreter, Rowan Atkinson, both that it is very difficult to separate them. Mr. Bean does not respond to the prototype of English, full of fine irony and subtle humor, but it is a more basic and simple, humor almost pure MIME. Ten years after starring in his first film, Mr. Bean returns with more force than ever and threatening to visit the beaches of Cannes the days in which the most important world cinema festival is held. Vacation Mr. Bean is a comedy crazy without pretensions, except the cause laugh after laugh in the Viewer. In this sense is an honest, that doesn't fool anyone, and film that offers what it promises, which, and although it hurts to say it, because today is worthy. Obviously, those who don't like the type of humor of Mr. Bean, this film les horrorizará, but those to those who like the character not stop laughing from the beginning until the end.The character resembles more to the of the television series that the of the previous film, barely does not speak, and his simple but effective comedy is based on the continuous slapstick. There are times really hilarious, like the scene in the restaurant (great Jean Rochefort), or the "operatic" sequence in the middle of the market. Special mention deserves all the acid retranca accompanies the character of Willem Dafoe and the presentation at the Cannes film festival. Vacation Mr. Bean is a comedy that meets perfectly its task: to pass a very fun time viewers. |
2,517 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/31 | Red Stovall | Terror en la niebla | 1 | 5 | muchocine | A huge hodgepodge full of nonsense | Another American remake which premiered between us, to oh surprise! It is not an Eastern horror film. This time have they got an excellent director John Carpenter film?The fog?, made in 1980, and that in spite of a couple of good ideas, consider it one of his worst films. I think it was a very untapped film, so when I found out that a new up to date of the film was underway, I thought that perhaps they best exploit the excellent material between hands, work of the same Carpenter, and his eternal partner, recently deceased, Debra Hill. Do however, when came the news that the director would be Rupert Wainwright, I lost all hope, and I started to tremble, because still I wake up sweaty, at night, remembering that awful called crappy?Stigmata?. ?It can not you do it worse?, I repeated over and over again. Well Yes. Yes it can, and after seeing the movie, I can only say that it turns the Carpenter into a masterpiece.In a very cute, coastal village that yet more mona Island, a bunch of monkeys characters roam their cute, when suddenly lives, a cute and dense fog, starts to load some, because it is the island hides a terrifying past. And no, it is not because there is a monkey.Trying to renew the previous version, they have wanted to do it in all possible aspects. Even rejuvenating to some of its main characters. So have gone hand in hand with two of the most famous actors in the current TV landscape. On the one hand, Tom Welling, interpreter of?Smallville? (serie_de_la_que_no_he_visto_ni_un_sólo_episodio,_¿qué_tal_está?), and by another, Maggie Grace, one of the protagonists of the? waiting, waiting, that there goes your favorite word, s or b r e v a l o r a d to?Does Lost?, although that itself, very entertaining. The two are? is that aren't, because their characters are not nothing, do not exist; Archetypes of archetypes of the topic. The third in discord is my beloved Selma Blair, an actress with a special curiosity, but that here nor is, does not exist, is not nothing, because there is nothing? You are welcome? Dios míoooo!!! the nieblaaaaaa? do!?!!I have chosen a bad day to quit smelling glue. What do not is you know what movie that phrase? What's going on? do not you understand what you are reading? It is that the film does not make sense. Because criticism either. And I prefer to talk about other things? How it is the fifth season of? 24? Do not assume anything, which I have not yet begun to see her, and I'm a fan of Jack Bauer, good for the first three, because the churro of the fourth was not worth or pa dipping in chocolate? I am thinking of the meme about strange habits that have happened to me, but that I leave for my blog, where I do a bit of trap and move them to the world of cinema?Well, come, I'm going to concentrate. Do already, I'm focused, pasámela, pasámela? In the director Chair, and painting the mona, Rupert Wainwright, which some personal enemy recommended that he go to the world of cinema. The realization of this film is not only extremely flat, if that isn't full of bumbling, and raises the clichés to the nth, causing sometime, specifically two, laughter. Elsewhere, suffers, and not just horror. Wainwright believes that with shooting close-ups, and then alternate them with a dramatic montage, more absurd sound effects, will cause some kind of suspense or tension, or intranqulidad, or knows what. What??The film is full of ridiculous moments, and suffers from the damn mania of wanting to explain it all, so some things are simply shameful, by incredible. If something had good Carpenter film, was that the most interesting aspects of the story were suggested, and left to the imagination of the Viewer. There's nothing of that, which is why, trying to not leave any loose, occur a number of illogical situations, and the result is worse. And if not, how bad explained and shown that it is, how is it possible that in the past (and not any spoiler) these four people could do what they did? It is that it is not possible.Anyway, a huge hodgepodge full of nonsense. I am surprised that it is produced by Carpenter; I hope that it has not been to put money, and has gained a substantial check. By the way, there are two remakes of films of Carpenter, underway; and are those of the magnificent?Halloween? and?The thing? (it was this in turn a remake of a masterpiece entitled?)The Enigma of another world? (by Christian i. Nyby). S or S, which will not make them Wainwright. S or S, which will not make them Wainwright. Uff. |
2,518 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/674 | Rafa Ferrer | La dalia negra | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Palm, gives us a dark film, at times too much, with incredible levels, dazzling sound, as well as one thousand and one letters "of the House", for, sadly an uneven result | Maybe it was the film that most expected this month, go, my dream release in the month of October, that is why tonight I have given me a beating from an hour train and average (between comings and goings), to see the film in conditions, and my opinion cannot be more adverse as well that beginsthat makes that one fits in the armchair, preparing the body for a great time of film, y. that damn "halt" which gives the tape from the first moment, where everything becomes tedious, and taking advantage of the seal of De Palma, slow motion, and is that, next time, be it tilda slow, so slow development that one gives you time to sleep and wake up, and barely moves forward one iota in the footage.In his interpretive capacity, perhaps I was with Hillary Swank, the only one that manages to make credible his character, since neither Aaron Eckhart or Scarlett (that looks beautiful as girl of the time), I pass the least, not to forget about Josh Harnett, who I see almost with the same interpretive level as Ben Affleck or Orlando Bloom, come on, the same expressiveness as a small vault of porespan, and Harnett has the same face when he is sad, that when this happy.Palm, gives us a dark film, at times too much, with incredible levels, dazzling sound, as well as one thousand and one letters "of the House", for, sadly an uneven result. I expected more, and now I weigh that hour and average way, which perhaps could have done something more fruitful else with my time. |
2,519 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/889 | Berto | Casino Royale | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A great resurgence for the series, with a new very charismatic Bond and that he predicts a new series of films, hopefully with the same style. | After twenty films of the legendary spy British, the producers of the series, after the downturn had the latest James Bond film starring Pierce Brosnan, attempting to find the series in a new direction, more modern and in line with our time and again that would attract people to cinema as formerly when the premiere of a Bond film was surrounded by an unprecedented expectation. Therefore, what better way to start again from the beginning? So they grabbed the first novel of his creator, Ian Fleming, Casino Royale, to start working with this new Bond. The novel had already been adapted long time, but anyone who has seen will know that the spirit of the classic Bond had little, with a Woody Allen script and played the spy by David Niven. Do now how difficult came from the election of the new Bond, after that Pierce Brosnan will dismiss the project for being too dated with his role as Spy, something funny, more than anything because in his next movie will do, then Yes, but spy? After a list more great that Goths Kings, chosen was Daniel Craig, actor quite discreet until then, although with good performances, and he broke with the typical Bond style of the twenty previous films. I acknowledge that when it was chosen as the new Bond nor I liked, but patiently wait to see it on the big screen and I do not pull directly to his jugular, as they did in all parts of the world, and now have to hide the head, because vista once the movie, Daniel Craig makes the best Bond since Sean Connery. Is not it may be comparable, because the style of Sean Connery is the typical English, conqueror and elegant gentleman, while Daniel Craig pulls in the direction of the medium and is more like any seen spy in a chapter of mission impossible, hard, relentless, without no remorse in killing, and rather disobedient with orders direct, although that also had the previous Bonds.En the beginning of the film, after teaching us how accomplished his famous license to kill (bone, in front of your spy number 00, 7) and continues with one of the best persecutions, walk that Yes, I have seen in the film. During the rest of the film level is still very high, although not everything could be as good, and in the final stretch the film loses bellows dangerously, focusing on love affairs, when normal and what I honestly expected more action was still. Even so is not too badly give certain human entity to the character, but dosed throughout the film had not been so bad.As regards the protagonists, Daniel Craig impeccable as a James Bond in its early days, too rough and easy trigger, and that gives a great example of entity character, after Pierce Brosnan, for my actor without enough charisma to embody Bond and that put the same face so you torturaran or was with one of the girls Bond retozando. Judi Dench in her role as M, very good, as previously since the saga and the evil of the day, Mads Mikkelsen, quite right, is not a Scaramanga, but not bad, that if the little something that cries blood is totally anecdotal, and a question that you arose me seeing it is for that lately the bad guys always must have some scar?default or something? Fixed that worldwide there bad most normalito. That if it had been a delight found us with a bad style Philip Seymour Hoffman in mission impossible 3. Eva Green, and consciously left to the end, thought me of it more light of the film, firstly because I do not think the typical Bond girl to use physically, thing that it falls within the normal watching the giro of the franchise, but not, has something which I am not convinced yet, both in its interpretation, and in the final twist that give your character. Anyway isn't bad actress, I believe in the Fund that is their problem, which is too good actress for this role, and despite everything comes out quite airy with its interpretation.In the script, then quite well, with that game of Poker as a backdrop and history quite closer to reality, in this case the bad is not the typical trying to conquer the world whatever it is, just a banker of terrorists, too fond of Poker and try, making them certain "accidents", bid up their investments.In short, a great resurgence for the series, with a new very charismatic Bond and that he predicts a new series of films, hopefully with the same style, which producers during the premiere already spoke positively with the damn Word, trilogy, for the rebirth of this Bond that we all know. |
2,520 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4304 | Ramón Balcells | En el valle de Elah | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A patriotic father in search of the truth that finally reflects on the mental and political state of the Goliath in which it lives. In the Valley of Elah is the proof that this 2008 can be a real year of cinema. | In the biblical story of David and Goliath, a strong Monster - Goliat - challenged to a village on the other side of the Valley that fought with him, and several of its inhabitants dared, but however none managed to defeat him. One day appeared David, with his ingenious strategy managed to defeat Goliath, not approaching, but a simple honda with a stone. It is known by all that the United States have always been symbolized, politically speaking, such as Goliath, a strong and powerful type that only attacks with his useless physical powers and not his head. The Viet Nam war was already symbolized as this confrontation, where Vietnamese people represented David and the aforementioned States Goliath. And this, as, unfortunately, time has not changed, continues with the ongoing war of Irak.Brian of Palma showed us a hard realism with the life of the soldiers in this latest war in the magnificent mockumentary Redacted. Now, after this and several attempts to revive the consciousness USA, as Redford with his lions and lambs, comes the wonderful and award-winning Crash, Paul Haggis, director to show us how to return these soldiers of Iraq and what and why have become virtually inhuman beings. With a breathtaking and superb performance of Tommy Lee Jones, the film moves at a prodigious pace slower than fast; It is a discourse on evil and useless war, on a patriotic father in search of the truth that finally reflects on the mental and political state of the Goliath that lives (magisterial and memorable the last plane of the film). Charlize Theron gives us another of his great performances, putting at the height of the main protagonist and perfectly equipped with pure humanism, as well as the always sensational Susan Sarandon, which in brief appearances we shrink the heart to all. And it is behind a police plot and a terrible family tragedy, a fierce and already mentioned criticism of the policy of one of the most powerful countries in the world, with brilliantly carried out and cinematically wonderful sequences that reach the heart and conscience. Perhaps the only thing we can condemn this magnificent film is the amount of characters that appear in a seen and unseen and that, however, could have given much more than itself (as a result, there are some scenes of which I, personally, convert), but not in this intimate drama. Full of realism, with a virtually perfect script and some interpretations of Oscar, in the Valley of Elah is proof that this 2008 may be a real year of movies, therefore it is undoubtedly an exceptional start. |
2,521 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1702 | Taliesin | 300 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | 300 is an orgy for the senses, in which Zack Snyder has created a new cinematographic language which allows a comic to the screen with great fidelity and without falling into the ridiculous. | It should take into account several things before going to the cinema to see 300. Firstly, it is not a historical film. It is an adaptation of a comic book by Frank Miller, which in turn is loosely based on a historical fact narrated by historians of the era, mainly Herodotus Alicarnaso (which is not a guarantee of fidelity). Secondly, the comic book on which it is based is very visual and doesn't have too many dialogues. The translation of this screen has been made with such care that 300 is above all images and sound, which is why the dialogues are far from being bright, saving two or three memorable phrases. Taking into account these two things, start.Runs the year 480 BC and the army of Xerxes I, Emperor of Persia, moves forward relentless aiming to conquer Greece. Leonidas I of Sparta decides to deal with them and to know outnumbered chooses to present battle in the pass of Thermopylae. It is estimated that the Persian army had 250,000 men, with about 7,000 Greeks, who stayed in 1000 following the withdrawal of part of the soldiers. There is that, after several days of fighting in the Persian numerical superiority eventually defeated the Greek tactic, the army of Xerxes saw reduced their number in 20,000 troops, against 1,000 Greek casualties. Nowadays it is thought this sacrifice, seemingly useless, served to give time to the rest of Greek armies to take positions, finally stopping the advance of the Persians. And is at the battle of Thermopylae in which focuses 300, and account as Leonidas with three hundred men of his personal guard facing the Turkish army. There are some stroke of policy, but the battlefield is the undisputed protagonist and the footage takes place between combat and combat. The clashes are shot in close-ups and the action freezes at times, as marking the vignettes of the comic book on which it is based. We will see on screen enough blood added digitally, which quite rightly have become an aesthetic appeal more. Rigour is more towards work of Miller with the historical fact, so no one is created the Spartan soldiers went into battle with a loincloth and a red cloak, for much success of the uniform among the female audience. And it is that, first and foremost, 300 is an orgy for the senses and the image is more careful than historical accuracy. It is visually an almost continuous feast in which photography, computer graphics and post-production join forces to offer the film that most has approached the aesthetics comic without falling into the ridiculous. On the other hand, the sound section is outstanding. Many times the music becomes protagonist, enhancing the action on screen and reaching epic dyes.In the negative section, most acute is the scene in which Leonidas is submitted to Xerxes and it seems that we we will see a continuation of Brokeback Mountain. If in a scene that should make a large difference in the plot half of the room is laughs, is that you've done something wrong. I thought it was a problem of dubbing, but in the original version the thing does not differ much. Again, fidelity to the comic is absolute, but Miller's Xerxes does not work equally well on screen than on paper and they would have to have noticed.In short, with 300 Zack Snyder (the director) has invented a new cinematographic language and has unmarked from the convecionalismos which both abound now that everyone is engaged in adapting comics. We would appreciate that a so special as the Miller's work has been so respectful treatment, but the result is more a visual spectacle that a memorable film, although if you go to the film knowing that it is what you can expect, I assure you that you will not be disappointed. |
2,522 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/863 | Pablo López | Transamerica | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A picture made with four hard, an escacharrado car and a rubber penis. | It seems that this year in Joslibul don't need Almodóvar to stir up the minds of the conservatives as regards sexual orientation refers to: we have out there to Ang Lee and on the other hand the film today responsibility us: TransAmerica, a picture made with four hard, an escacharrado car and a rubber penis.While films 'seems that it is happening this.' I like into perspective (I recently have still the master what remains of the day), think that you for issues like these that people tend to not want to listen to, should be better to show them as they are, without possibility to doubt 'this means one thing, but can also mean another'. And perhaps Ang Lee suffers a little bit of that, leave the intimacy, simplicity and self-reflection at the mercy of a subject as interesting and as important as that dealt with in Brokeback Mountain, while TransAmerica show shamelessly life of a transsexual who a week after his sex change operation discovers that he has a teenage sonwith all the problem that leads to him, together with which they had previously. It has seemed curious that while Lee sample homosexuality in jeans (in this case concrete rather cabreros, right?), this road movie presents us a personage with Indian descent. coincidence, or feature?Stands out from the film a Felicity Huffman well nominated for an Oscar and a script that moves between the more sweetened fussiness and the hijoputez more absolute, making stops at intermediate points that represent some of the best scenes of the film. Still, the script has holes a number that would not be more that had filled in, because the 100 minutes that lasts the film spend flying.In short, a short film that shows a Felicity Huffman in State of grace (continuous, since its appearance in desperate housewives) and that raises a very interesting story to learn a little more life transsexual collective in America. That Yes, although it has been stock Lee, must say that his film is quite better movie than this, because the limitations already technical, not artistic, are quite notable. |
2,523 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3016 | Ramón Balcells | Os declaro marido y marido | 2 | 5 | muchocine | To pass the time perhaps it is okay, but nothing more. Recommended to fans of American romantic comedies which are not against gay marriage. | I will not extend more than what they needed. The Dennis Dugan movie is another bad example of American comedy. I am sorry guys, but increasingly I am sick over the matter. Yes, perhaps in this there are some original touch (if you can call) or perhaps a trial, without coming to story, noted for its rarez. Even the two main characters (this time man and man) come to be credible, although they do not entirely bad, just do what the public requests: pallasadas, some other face dramatic that we escape the lagrimilla and the rest, faceted simply bland. But at least we have to my (our) beloved Jessica Biel, which not only makes a very funny and well played role, but it is more beautiful than ever. The script, a bad experience, full of scenes that do not come to mind and characters left over greatly. Perhaps some other secondary funny, as the homosexual brother of Biel, the cure, the beggar of the wedding or Ving Rhames, but I assure you that the antics of Steve Buscemi (by the way, what here?) are incredibly pathetic. The reason of making a film about homosexuals? I do not know. The intention is good, but is disastrously (accident, forced request, badly drawn gay characters). To pass the time perhaps it is okay, but nothing more. Recommended to fans of American romantic comedies which are not against gay marriage. |
2,524 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/785 | Otis B. Driftwood | Casino Royale | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Craig transmits many nuances to the character, as many as the new approach requires, and for my taste - I'm sorry girls - it makes it infinitely better than Brosnan, whose greatest merit was put face of palo embittered during the footage. | This James Bond is different. It had to be different, by force, for many reasons: the key, the character needed an "emerging", one updated to preserve its essence and gain a new audience that was beyond us, nostalgic fans who grew up with Sean Connery and Roger Moore. From the point of view of producers, that reason implies a strong economic, undoubtedly, vital to the survival of the franchise that has been able to extend for more than forty years, but ran the risk of anquilosar is. And opted for the more risky bet, actually: preserve the character more "conneryano", but humanizing it, i.e., Bond continues to be indestructible, but that status is not obtained for free, but through a hard process of forging character. and how to do that? Since bringing the character to its origins, this is, the novels of Ian Fleming that gave him life and containing a rather less limpid than the films Bond. The trick is to make "Casino Royale", first of these novels, the first adventure of the British agent as a double zero, licensed to kill. Thus the 007 incarnate by Daniel Craig is younger, more impulsive, more trusted, more arrogant and, paradoxically, less certain of himself. All these faults will be polishing disappointments and sticks, especially many clubs, as in "Casino Royale" see how James him shake as nice on several occasions. Yes, dear readers, James Bond bleeds, shouts, gut pain, physical and moral. He has no fear, because to reach double zero has had to remove it long before, but he looks much more fledgling and vulnerable.This approach, along with the election of Daniel Craig as an actor that would embody the get smart, planted of controversy this film much earlier, even start shooting. However, I like both the approach and the interpreter, although I admit that I was of them that they hesitated with the election. With regard to the physical, it is clear that this Bond is precisely the opposite Pierce Brosnan, but it already happened at the time when Moore replaced Connery in 1972. In this case I believe that change is even better, since Craig provides much more tough guy image. On the character and his interpretation, I think a very novel way to portray to the actor to evolve with it, giving the impression that in forthcoming films grow and mature at the time that makes Bond (or vice versa). Craig passes many nuances, as many as the new approach requires, and for my taste - I'm sorry girls - it makes it infinitely better than Brosnan, whose greatest merit in the four films made as 007 was put face of palo embittered during the footage, without showing even a pinch of humor that this always leads get.Moreover, the film is quite entertaining. Without being the best in the series, it outstrips its recent predecessors (except, perhaps, "The world is not enough"), and since then, reconciles with those who almost vomitamos with such bad taste joke called "Die another day". "Casino Royale" largely meets all the elements that make the Bond franchise which has always been, with scenes and spectacular scenery, action vibrating when it is (and give thanks to Martin Campbell, the director, learned the lesson of "Goldeneye" and already not extends persecution to infinity), a perhaps unusual hardness to which we were accustomed andvery important, return to the rounded bellezones with languid anorexia that seemed imposed in the last decade. Eva Green as Catherina murine illuminate the screen while falling drawn to the charms of our hero. A couple of bugs that I find and that are fairly obvious: one, the footage again excessive by the ballast of wanting to explain too much that could be explained alone; the other is that the villains, although they come equipped with all the Repertoire of tics and own iconography bondiana physical defects, appear somewhat diluted in its conception and never seem to be at the height of 007, do not give that feeling of omnipotence that no doubt appeared in almost all the previous films. Maybe that he has wanted also "humanize" the villain as they do with Bond, but if so the effectiveness in this case is much lower. Also squeaking some blunders of continuity that, while not influencing the history, fans of life may seem annoying; for example, the fact that "M" remains the "new" head interprets Judi Dench from "Goldeneye" (and also in this film before, indeed, as successor to Admiral Miles messervy ever besides) and yet here appears as his original head. That and the disappearance of the characters of Q and miss Moneypenny, but if I have to be sincere, I no missed them less.As I try, quite risky, revitalize the franchise, would put you a significant effort. Certainly needed polishing many things and that, certainly we will have to get used to see a more mundane James Bond although it remains invincible and irresistible in equal parts. The survival of the brand and the character much depend on how the public reacts to this new (or perhaps not so new?) visions of Mr. Bond. That Yes, the writers should take into account that this 007 will be much harder and aceradamente cold in the next films, and that the caprices that come here excused by history not be allow you so blithely later, when you suppose that Bond has managed to eliminate them. I'm not saying no nonsense of fan obtuse with this, put that in the same "Casino Royale" that is already pointing in a way nothing evening towards the end of the tape. And if producers are consistent with this, I have the feeling that we will still have James Bond / Daniel Craig for a while. |
2,525 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3574 | Andrés Pons | Mr Brooks | 4 | 5 | muchocine | In a miraculous way we find one of the films most original, hooligan and hilarious years with an apotheosis Costner that reinvents the interpretations of psychopaths with a work full of nuances where the actor gives a crash course in interpretation. | Another THRILLER PSYCHO? Anyway one more than assassin that he puts a halt to justice with its brutal crimes. Another copy of the silence of the Lambs and above with two completely finished interpreters KEVIN COSTNER that after success with dancing with Wolves never ceases to ridicule both as an actor and director in the postman of the future or WATERWORLD accompanied by DEMI MOORE who lately gave us with angeles los of charlie 2 or in the darkness. For more INRI only director has a previous film on the unbearable poli by chance and producer with titles as mediocre as assassins.With all this it is normal thinking that you'll eat a hodgepodge of Championship, because of miraculous way we find one of the films most original, hooligan and hilarious years with an apotheosis COSTNER that reinvents the interpretations of psychopaths with a work full of nuances where the actor gives a crash course in interpretation.His Alter-Ego lies in the always brilliant William HURT who we saw recently in SYRIANA or a history of violence.Technically round with a script that combines fun with intrigue and terror to equal parts graceful out of all proposed with great elegance. The only but is that DEMI MOORE is still such a bad actress as always, in all ways a different film that will surprise more than one. |
2,526 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3138 | Ana Belén Pacheco | The invasion | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The film has no pace, nor grace is not entertaining. Hirschbiegel has decided to throw towards intellectual film but has become a child and rather clumsy attempt to RIP on the surface. | I'm from the theory that if you don't have anything interesting to say is better to shut up. This increases depending on if also someone has already has bothered to say so should fall in the repetition and boredom.The invasion is the fourth version of the Jack Finney novel "La invasion de los thieves of bodies" that gave rise to the self-titled by Don Siegel is a myth of the fantasy film mixing politics with science fiction (who if not in cold war Communists could be the protagonists?). After this Philip Kaufman shot 78 the invasion of the ultracuerpos (and only the title gives a bit of laughter) and Abel Ferrara with hijackers of the 93 bodies. The degeneracy of these adaptations was witness to his original writer but for his fortune he will not witness this theft of ideas that he died in 1995, although I know that you stir uneasy in the Tomb.Carol is a psychiatrist who begins noticing disturbing changes in behaviour in all who surround him it. Soon discovers that an alien species of virus is invading the bodies by depriving them of human feelings undertakes the way to recover his son who is with his farcical helped, of course, by the doctor handsome on duty. The film has no pace, nor grace is not entertaining. Hirschbiegel has decided to throw towards intellectual film but has become a child and rather clumsy attempt to RIP on the surface. Known for the sinking, the truth is that it was difficult to keep the bar in this industry but its decision to choose this psudothriller of terror as the first film in the Americas has been a grim choice. It has not only been his fault, Nicole Kidman seems a zombie from the foreground which makes it difficult to create an empathy of doped heroine of caffeine and what our dear Daniel Craig has the rictus more serious than a latex doll. That said, if there is nothing intelligent to say keep all silence. |
2,527 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/690 | Jeremy Fox | El diablo viste de Prada | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It is halfway between criticize the fashion world or defend it as artistic and cultural movement, changing the position of a scene to another. | If someone believes in this film can be a surprise notice that in the following lines you will find some slight spoiler on the first half hour.This is a rebellious girl (Anne Hathaway) that comes with a chef who is rebellious and somewhat Bohemian (and rebel) friends. The girl goes to a job interview in the most important fashion of the World magazine (the rebels of today are as well) where is accepted despite the fact that he knows nothing of fashion magazine or his famous and despotic boss (Meryl Streep).At first things not going great for her, and for some reason that escapes me, everyone insists on say it is blind while it is clear that it is quite thin. The case is that the girl begins to dress up fashion and suddenly the professional success smiles (even see thin, after it). As his friends and her boyfriend are very rebellious give back to their professional success demonstrating that, moreover, they are a little memos. The rebel girl will have to face all these problems and find itself (whatever that).This is the theme of "The Devil Wears Prada" (The Devil Wears Prada), film by David Frankel was presented out of competition at the Venice Festival of this year (the shame falls on them) and that has had some positive reviews. The excess of alcohol in blood during the projection does not help to appreciate a film and thus leave criticism out (that if those critics the had seen, of course, everything there is).The fact is that the film is halfway between criticize the fashion world (a pathetic world where appearance is the only important thing and that is, at least, partially guilty of depressions and problems of self-esteem worldwide) or defend it as artistic and cultural movement, changing the position of a scene to another.The film works as a very basic entertainment for a later silly in front of the TV but nothing more. The only thing notable is the presence of Stanley Tucci and, above all, Meryl Streep in a couple of scenes leaves a few strokes of his infinite talent to fill the screen and convey emotions even in the most hollow productions. I hope that we can see her soon in a film to its height and not in a product like this, which is the more conventional which can be seen today in theaters. |
2,528 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3749 | Rafa Ferrer | Blade runner | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Little can be said of this film, little can be counted to not know, personally not is that is one of my favorite sci fi films, although I've seen more than one trillion times. | Little can be said of this film, little can be counted to not know, personally not is that is one of my favorite sci fi films, although I've seen more than one trillion times (the latter if memory does not fail me in the film library of Madrid), but, as in those tapes that one you can see and vces there's always something to reedescubrirso taking advantage of this excellent new edition on DVD (and will be) take this opportunity to return to contemplate one of the summits of the film of our time.We are, as I have already said to the umpteenth Edition of the film, this that comes with a Briefcase, a figure of the car of the protagonist, and various promotional materials, one that fans of the film (those wishing for this to appear in his epitaph of ".") I've seen things that you have not, attack ships on fire beyond of Orion. I saw "C" rays shine in the darkness near the door of "Tanhauser". All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... "it's time to die", true it is that you have added digital effects and music (as if the tape needed), since it has aged (already has 15 years) quite well.Blade Runner has printed, his style in hundreds of tapes, whether genre Sci-Fi, or any other genre (even in commercials and games), and perhaps to many years later it happened with Matrix (not call me heretic by uniting them in a paragraph), will always be there for your query, use and enjoyment.It is curious, even funny, see the roles of people whether consecrated in cinema, from Harrison Ford, newly out of the first Star Wars, until Rutger Hauer, Young.Las unique drawbacks that I see, is that, for a start the marked character of the protagonists (the sempiterna fight between good and evil, is shown in a very sharp and precise way)(, the very good good, bad very idem), a slow pace of development that is lost in both flat long, and a little organization of villains, that if it's worth are very bad and everything that your you want, but they last less that Darth Maul in Star Wars Episode I (not call me heretic by joining them in this another paragraph).Leaving that common side, mark the excellent production design, hotel for the time I filmo (1982), as well as the costumes and sets, in addition, the future us embody (now in the 21st century) is not so preposterous, as in "Son of men" of Alfonso Cuarón one is remaining and his air of true bad roll and insecuritythinking about what that, thanks to new technologies, come us front in the coming years.Particularly striking is that, thanks to the network have proliferated nicks that have to do with the tape pretty from Deckard, until Roy Batty, or the very famous Nexus 6. |
2,529 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1541 | Plissken | Inland empire | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Once again, among the joke and the feeling of seeing something unique. Hate the Lynch film because strives too not tell me nothing and irritate me. I admire the artist Lynch because it is able to take me three hours reacting against his work. | Background: 'The Elephant Man', 'Blue Velvet', 'Twin Peaks' and 'Wild heart' I loved, 'Mulholland Drive' me outraged. A couple of years later, I reconcilié with his film thanks to overdose: 'Eraserhead' and 'Lost Highway' at a stroke. David Lynch I like Nice, but I do not share his relationship with the Viewer. It entered the projection of 'Inland Empire' ready, once again, to be challenged and defeated.What he believed would be: Nikki Grace is an actress in decadence that gets a role in a film with Devon, a young actor with a reputation of womanizer. Just at the beginning of the trials, they discover that they have embarked on the remake of a damn movie, especially for its protagonists. Nikki begins a search for his own identity through a threatening oneiric maze.What in the end told me: schizophrenic filmmakers, sitcoms of rabbits, whores and a circus Internet theatre and full of Poles will compete out of favor with the audience of the century XXl. alien to the fight, Lynch descojona of all of us in its "Inland Empire" which gives its name to the film. Or there is this or nothing, which in the case is the same.David Lynch demonstrates, once again, be more "mainstream" filmmaker and best challenges the intelligence (and patience) of the Viewer. Three hours of continuous chaos, a spiral of climax that are happening, one after another, from approximately the film 20 minute. Until that time, Lynch develops do narration? that it only serves to give an overview and some peace of mind to turn investors. Later, and supported in his new toy, digital video, the Missoula returns to his subjects, his obsessions, and again, more than ever to strive in annihilating all possible narrative. It exempt from the need to "tell"?Inland Empire? It is able to fascinate with the strength of a glorious Laura Dern in the proximity that the video gives to this new nightmare, with the overwhelming power of the masterful use of sound and music. Is Lynch in its freer and less film since, perhaps?Eraserhead?.And out there, is precisely where the viewer can find their particular exit to atmospheric terror of?Does Inland Empire?: Lynch, in the background, does not want anything, just evoke feelings, moods. Have you on the edge of the seat. He has perhaps never wanted to have much (unless paid you for it). Yes, is very aware of its almost mythical dimension, and this is able to laugh himself, of his filmography to the full and the spectator, critical included. If you survive to his almost insufferable Hermeticism, 'Inland Empire' is very entertaining, and even fun.Do short, Lynch requires all your attention, your intelligence and your patience for? have a bad time. Later, the lights are lit, and you're next to someone that is familiar to you, and you wonder to yourself about what you've lived (in silence, no one knowing that you've understood nothing), and what you've lived can not be measured in numbers, stars, or anything like, decide to keep you quiet and not say anything until you get home and look in the network the interpretations of others to the that you've lived. At least, you are not alone in your confusion. Once again, among the joke and the feeling of seeing something unique.Hate the Lynch film because strives too not tell me nothing and irritate me. I admire the artist Lynch because it is able to take me three hours reacting against his work, chills or clean laugh. A 2 for the film, a 8 for the work. I do not know if I explain: go to see her and believes. |
2,530 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/460 | José Córdoba | Clerks 2 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Is a small, nothing original, nothing ambitious film, but is welcomed and it is fun and entertaining while forgettable... | Twelve years ago, Kevin Smith made his first film Clerks, a small film that chronicled the life of two employees of a small supermarket, shot in black and white and very charismatic characters that not stopped talking. That was its main feature the verbiage of his characters and their brilliant dialogues and "geeks". Today it is a cult movie that I'd like to see to see how has aged. The later career of Smith has not been able to escape the long shadow of this film that marked the constants in his filmography: characters of uncontrollable verbiage close to thirty and very "geeks", understood in its meaning of fan of comedians, Star Wars, etc. Come on, a few characters that seem quite close to many of us and perhaps lie there, the success of his films. Following the disappointing results of their latest movies and the tremendous critical criticism a Jersey Girl, his latest work, Smith returned to his roots and presents the continuation of his first film, Clerks II, which was initially going to be entitled "The Passion of the Clerks". The result is a fun, small, nothing pretentious film sees with a constant smile and forget soon of seeing. It is a reunion of old friends, there are two subsidiaries of the original, Dante and Randal, Jay and silent Bob after passing through prison, and also appear faces known as Jason Lee and Ben Affleck. Twelve years have passed since the original, but strictly speaking it doesn't, the characters have not matured although Dante wants to lay your head and move away from New Jersey with his fiancée. Continue to have the same discussions and the same behaviour, as if nothing had happened in twelve years. Therefore the aim of Smith in this film is show us that, at long last, these characters will mature, will finally move from adolescence to enter the adult world. By the way, in the form of marriage, children, stable employment. Smith, despite the apparent irreverence of his films, is a fervent Catholic and devotes all of his films to God. The history is very typical and thousand views, Smith has never been a visual director and here again to prove it, his films based all his strength in the dialogues and characters in wild situations. And here the film works with a discussion environment to the Lord of the rings very funny, sporadic occurrences of Jay and Bob or the scene with the donkey. It is also narrated with an appropriate rate, so your footage goes really fast and includes any surprises as a musical number which is also very successful. Everything seasoned by a set of well chosen songs, which are perfectly coupled to the images.Ultimately, Clerks II is a film suitable for all those who follow the work of Kevin Smith and "geeks" in general. Is a small, nothing original, nothing ambitious film, but is welcomed and it is fun and entertaining while forgettable. A return to the origins. |
2,531 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1009 | Oscar Cantero | Descubriendo el Cielo | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A film bizarre, chaotic and at times incoherent, but who nevertheless like. | Discovering the sky is a rare film. Quite rare. It is one of those that makes you constantly have the feeling that you're losing something, that there is something else in it that you are not able to see; But despite everything you like. It is somewhat similar to what years ago I happened with some X-files episodes, which I do not know anything, but I loved. I guess that it will have you had that feeling ever.It is a film that rides halfway between drama and science fiction, to grosso modo narrates as the angels of heaven needed a new advent to retrieve tables of Alliance and break the Covenant with men, in revenge for having abandoned these religion.It covers the passage of a great number of years, that since that it begins until it ends it's been about 20, and does so in a way a bit chaotic and sharp, but with some charm. It gives the feeling of lost long time in mundane scenes, while it is passed on tiptoe by others that are key to the development of the film. Also their interpreters are somewhat histriónicos, exaggerated in the fanfare and gestures, and we could even tell you that lack you verisimilitude to the characterization of the characters. But above all stands the performance of one of the greats of the screen (is my opinion, for taste colors), which is Stephen Fry, recalcitrant British ever there, multidisciplinary actor with a preference for comedy, and usually do exquisite and acid typically British humour gala that in real life. FRY is capable of making people laugh, but also of thrill, as he does at times in discovering the sky and years ago with his masterful interpretation of Oscar Wilde in Wilde, what in my opinion is the definitive interpretation of the great author, that own actor has acknowledged deep similarities, including homosexuality.But anyway, what they want to tell you; while I find more faults than virtues, to me has not disappointed, and at times I liked this movie. Though honestly, I don't know to explain to them why. |
2,532 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1315 | Jose Contreras | Más extraño que la ficción | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Imagine that a Santiago Nasar leave him read the principle of "Chronicle of a death foretold". The poor man seek desperately to Garcia Marquez that he changed the end, and hence also the title. | «The day that would kill, Santiago Nasar stood at 5.30 in the morning to wait for the ship that arrived the obispo.»»Imagine that a Santiago Nasar leave him read the principle of "Chronicle of a death foretold". The poor man seek desperately to Garcia Marquez that he changed the end, and hence also the title. This is what happens to the protagonist of "more stranger than fiction". will Ferrer discovers that it is part of a novel in which is going to die, but do not know who is the writer, so he visits a Professor of literature. The Professor shows you that you cannot change the end because the tragedy is a masterpiece with this ending.The question is often not openly raise, but each movie makes it between the lines. In "Infiltrated" Scorsese makes us suffer every moment for the fate of the Fink good and bad. Charges to one with a wrong decision, and however everyone applauds. In "Apocalipto", the protagonist has the death on the heels, a slip and Mel Gibson can kill him in every scene. If he is still alive, or if he kills him, he responds to a pact with the Viewer. An implicit Covenant. "More strange than fiction" is a discussion out loud about this Pact.When Will Ferrer discover that it is in a novel and attends the Professor he asks if it is a comedy or a tragedy. Depending on that one or the other, he's going to live or not. So says tracks that has two pages of your book. When the girl replied evil, puts a stick to the tragedy, when it seems that agree you, it puts it in the comedy. The girl does not understand the sticks in his notebook. This list is an occurrence.The idea of talking about narration in a narrative seems Andy Kauffman. Unamuno had it before but he let her in occurrence. "More strange than fiction" makes it dramatically, a discussion between a character and its author. The love story seems a formality, but ultimately endearing. The clock that gives unity to the matches is manual, but grace. "Stranger than fiction" it seems an exercise, but it works as a film. |
2,533 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3284 | Andrés Pons | Saw 4 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | I come to witness the gruesome quarter of Saw and I do not just mean to incite terror, in any case provoked me boredom. Poor David Cronemberg should be swearing in several dead languages. | Damn friends! Occasionally do us unforgivable things. I'm here to witness the gruesome quarter SAW and I do not just mean to incite terror, in any case caused me bored. Obviously it was played to them to choose the movie, so I went directly to the slaughterhouse to see the new crap that occur them in the new release.The DARREN LYNN BOUSMAN returned to again make a mess with their continuous movements of camera, the film seems orchestrated by a fucking blind monkey rhythm of video-clip. Such was in charge of the direction of the Remake of SCANNERS. Poor DAVID CRONEMBERG should be swearing in several dead languages.The same lousy actors of a saga that they eat hot thanks to her that no one else will hire outside SAW. In is occasion the despelote starts from the beginning, in full autopsy are with a tape embedded in the stomach of the psychopath. Take horse chestnut! But is every moment the thing is worse.Characters that appear and disappear to the free will, increasingly more ridiculous tricks and again one final surprise really insane that her not believed anyone not drunk. Photography, music, actors direction is again of kindergarten, leaving a single powerful time is the annotated autopsy, pure curiosity for lovers of gore. Else more than enough, the worst is that probably are new parts per roll. |
2,534 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/405 | Juan David | Brokeback mountain | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Highly recommended almost pin, five stars. | Maybe have been better to wait until now to talk about this movie when already all the vibes of "ohhh a movie about gay Cowboys" longer step, at least so it is possible to speak of it as what it is, i.e. a movie.As everyone knows the movie narrates the love story between Ennis and Jack, two Cowboys begin a secret romance and extends for many years; logically this romance is secret and both their lives conventional with wives and children only meet some times in the year, eventually costs do what more you want to secretly reach them.I believe that this movie has been put to the test the intelligence of many people, on the one hand those who see the movie only as a gay movie and therefore feels a kind of rejection/morbid fascination with the movie and on the other hand those who believe that the best of the movie is the fact that the case of a gay couple and therefore see as a sort of symbol of the cause, I believe that both positions are erroneous.In this sense only Brokeback Mountain features a theme which has been narrated thousands of times as it is impossible to love and the impossibility of being with the person that you love, from Romeo and Juliet through interracial love stories, the theme is the same only that currently there are homosexuals who by social pressure has dificulrtades to be together as before the people of different race or religion.¿Es were a perfect movie? For nothing, it is true that it has some problems of rhythm and that compared to other films which portrayed honors last year as a Crash, this clearly less structured, obviously Crash is better narrativamente, Brokeback Mountain is however the best film of the past year, precisely because of their imprefecciones and the strength of its history.Even though the script has some flaws, the film very well directed, photography and music are extraordinary and the actions of truth are very good, especially of the couple protagonistano only by the obviousness of portraying a gay couple, but because they are able to reflect differently the same anguish and sadness, while much of the elogos took them Heath Ledger I believe the weight of the movie is what It carries Gyllenhaal is far one of the best young actors today, especially the scenes where his character faces the Ledger by the fact of not having been able to make a living together.This is a sad and fragile movie and think that you can only appeal to gays is stupid, heterosexual or homosexual anyone who ever has been able to be with the person she loves is able to understand this movie and feel identified with it. In short, highly recommended almost pin, five stars and this DVD |
2,535 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/571 | Rafa Ferrer | El diablo viste de Prada | 3 | 5 | muchocine | An original tape, although I understand that the book retains much more bad baba that the film... | Struck me the trailer, a new idea of as they should be "progress" of the films, and it is that it showed the initial minutes of the same, go, leaving us with honey on the lips, come on, if a want to know more. you already know. (go to the cinema to see).The tape, a tragicomedy, encloses the ins and outs of the world of fashion, slightly inspired by the magazine Elle (and there is not another in the sector that is so), and its Director, (great Meryl Streep on screen, literally eating on screen to all those who appear in the same.) Anne Hathaway in her line, and is that the side much (and her will continue to costing) remove the sanbenito "Disney" and continues to be the extroverted girl (some comparing it with the new Julia Roberts), met in the films "Princess by surprise".Perhaps, the best of the film are secondary, that Stanley Tucci, who acts as a fairy godmother/awareness of Hathaway, Emily Blunt (as a bad stepsister), Simon Baker (as principe azul), and is that, as read (my great friends of muchocine.net), it is easy to compare the film with a fairy tale that the presence of Hathaway, is not strange. Finally, tape original, although I understand that the book retains much more bad baba than the movie. |
2,536 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/259 | Doris | Cars | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Display of design and meticulousness, one creation of the geniuses of the Pixar House | Perfection is impossible, I'd say that. But Pixar hovering ever closer; do that Yes, what? MOM? Disney lets you. Cars, the latest in animation for the big screen, is a display of design and meticulousness, one creation of the geniuses of the House which, however, suffers from little imagination in the message, something what is regrettable after a past full of intelligent wonders of the drawing. However, the triumph is assured, especially among children and the lovers of racing.Do Lightning McQueen, the protagonist racing car, is in danger of becoming a cocky champion only worried about the triumphs and the? Flash?. His biggest dream is to win the piston Cup of California, a title in the great power that would make him a young star of the racing. But going way of the competition, you lose your phone and will stop in a small town in the legendary Route 66. There he will meet his future friends and will understand that life is not only to win?All very predictable but possibly necessary given the characteristics of the product. Humanize a car is not an easy task, and to compensate for the lack of expressiveness, which is however very accomplished, pulls the always ready sentimental appeal. Need an affordable moral but without going and, of course, a nice ending. Do the tradition is not going to change at this point, but at least is to be welcomed that we have avoided by all means some? topicazos? irreversible.Does taking advantage even the pull of formula 1, figures such as Michael Schumacher and Fernando Alonso (stuck to shoehorn in the Spanish version), are left? see? in a round? cameos? It included some that another surprise. Something of everything squeaking, as well as the so-called love story, whose sole function in the script is to make time, and crane? best friend? McQueen. Do about which the? well of truth? history is ugly and silly adds nothing (what such, any time, be a friend of? bad?).Despite the ailing development and an excess of localism which runs the risk of being ignored by some part of the respectable of Lasseter not disappoint as winks and double readings refers. And, of course, his wit manages effortlessly redirect the sudden sweetening of the moment, including the central song of the indispensable Randy Newman, Our Town, starring this chronicler as a mockery outright towards type Pocahontas ballads in several sequences. Everything is possible.But what really excited to see the machines in action. It is a real pleasure to appreciate the game of textures, colors, reflexes and precision that Cars boast an impressive superiority. The movements of a camera that does not exist do the rest. So enjoy with the speed and are not lost, as I have to know, the opening credits. Nor the short of the principle, the man Orchestra, a delicacy that is almost worth more than two hours of projection. Just a few minutes. |
2,537 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1415 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | V de Vendetta | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Under a crude appearance, a consumer product gratísimo, able to move to the greedy public experiences ideologically strong beats and another, who only want a well-made movie that distract two hours of the deadly tedium of some winter afternoons. | Behind V for Vendetta is Orwell, who served as my first serious readings. There is also a healthy exercise of contravening rules that strikes as fundamental in society of well-being (téorico) of our civilization. Contravention of the legitimacy of a State (though it's right and apparent democratic formulas in pursuit) and headquarters overlooks the terrorism: is credited as legitimate and we even agree that, occasionally, all words manifested hollow when they collide (frontal and brutally) against the blind inertia of a rotten power of a rogue State who has betrayed their chartersits basic organizational structure for the sake of barbarism, whatever his visible mask. And then what we are talking about? V for Vendetta vindica fascism, individual decision-making affecting others for the sake of an unjustified sense of order that probably nobody else shares? To not shock in excess bienpensantes minds and into the pockets of the distributors who will dispose of the film, the work of Alan Moore's graphic cartoonist whose work were also brought to the film the League of extraordinary gentlemen and from hell, was significantly lightened: it disarms of its nasty and invests a mediocre (but tolerable) rebellion against the Governmentthat it strangles the citizen, as we see, and stolen canallamente freedom.Without falling into the pop pose, which would have been perhaps more predictable, V for Vendetta uses a rich visual structure where raw ideology on the action and where the characters, without being neither deep nor worthy of Shakespeare, meet the demanding Viewer seeking a dramatic sediment according to the risk of the proposal. This modern Robin Hood which is V, autodeclarado liberator of the people oppressed and decided boldly to put a bomb under the British Parliament train, is also forced an Evey (Natalie Portman) guardian pure and neutral, it ignores the folds of policy and just as we knew during all the footage, identified with V to the point of being able to continue his work in his absence.All very subversive, although flavoured with a very striking cast (Hugo Weaving, Natalie Portman, Stephen Rea, John Hurt and Stephen Fry). All very anarchic, although relativized by the obvious odor of correction policy in these turbulent times.Written by Wachowsky brothers and produced by James McTeigue, Assistant of direction of the famous and overrated series Matrix, V for Vendetta is a regular work that touches and raises a dialogue. As there are few films regualres, which move and provoked a dialogue, one of the best films this reasonably critical Viewer has seen in recent times, though this time has been the broker dvd and not the appetizing big screen declare V for Vendetta. Moreover, chapeau. |
2,538 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1722 | Caruco | El último show | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Do remarkable atmosphere, good work behind and before cameras, but a sleeping history that can only attract the interest of music lovers? country? do or? bluegrass?, unconditional and scholars Altman film or nostalgic nostalgia. | Ignored by critics and audience Awards, the posthumous work of the recently defunct Robert Altman is a charming and nostalgic look to the last day in the life of a radio program "A prairie home companion", which airs live from the Minnesota Fitzgerald Theatre, before that the building be torn down to build parking lots.Two last moments, the Altman as a filmmaker, and a space between the radio waves are linked almost by the whims of fate. But the vision of the Director of "Vidas cruzadas" is not intended to detract from tears and sadness, sinó extolling a few characters, despite the lack of popularity or triumph artísico and economic, they never cease to be free, nor although they rob them the reduced space itself.Synonymous with choral prominence, stars like Michelle Pfeiffer, George Clooney, singer Tom Waits (who had been involved in "Vidas cruzadas"), could not or did not want this time to go into the project. On the other hand, others known as Meryl Streep, Lindsay Lohan, Tommy Lee Jones, Lily Tomlin, Kevin Kline, Woody Harrelson or Garrison Keillor (the real presenter which took that program), Yes.Do and one of the attractions of the film is seeing them and oirles singing, especially topics? country?, as their characters they improvise or repeated to the rhythm of the melody, the advertising slogans of the sponsoring brands. But, despite the good weather that is respita among the artistic cast, the spark is very particular and rarely manages to penetrate the screen to catch the Viewer.Is a clear example the character of Kevin Kline, called Guy?Noir? and a prototype of typical dedective of film noir that intervenes as an observer close to what is happening, as well as a sort of Narrator, with interventions that contain jokes or reflections that does not stand out precisely or by his grace and wit.From the first image of the film, the heaven of the American Midwest, where different radio programs that talk about the price of meat pork can tune, about how they know better the noodles or how to save the soul, rarely manifests the interest. Only the scene in which the duo composed of Dusty (Woody Harrelson) and Lefty (John C. Reilly, one of the best side of the contemporary cinema), count and sing "bad jokes" get something animate function.As well as the curious presence, and in tune with the private dedective Kline, one that embodies? femme fatale? with sensual forms of Virginia Madsen. An Angel blond and dressed in an impeccable white coat that stands in the metaphor of the passage of time and death. Two issues in which it is easy to see how they aguijoneaban also to Altman, and however it portrays with benevolence and even beauty.Do remarkable atmosphere, good work behind and before cameras, but a sleeping history that can only attract the interest of music lovers? country? do or? bluegrass?, unconditional and scholars Altman film or nostalgic nostalgia. |
2,539 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1700 | Rafa Ferrer | Closer | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Do could qualify to?Closer? (blinded by the desire in some Spanish-speaking countries) as a bloody wonder. Closer, in some real way as life itself. | Good is that you're watching a movie and comes me to mind quite a few ideas on how to approach my criticism / opinion, and good is the feeling that one has after the screening to foot and as a play begin to applaud, if could be described as a "Closer" (blinded by the desire in some Spanish-speaking countries) as a bloody wonder, the suffering is something to play, nor happiness is something that we see with ease on screen, where they have become accustomed us from our most remote childhood as spectators with something so easy and banal as "boy meets girl, they chatting and they fall in love", however in the last film by Mike Nichols (famous among other "Weapons of woman") all schemes we have Super-Duper memorized by the film break. For those some other time have suffered some breakup "Closer" represents everything that has happened, unstable loves marching as the foam on the sea, bizarre situations that end up turning into something real, more real than one thought, and is that the film is perhaps a small "bite of reality" in screenexcellent performances of Natalie Portman and Clive Owen, I think almost the best, perhaps by Jude Law I start to get bored on screen and Julia Roberts despite the fact that I love it looks already "entradita in years" hurts! Someone told me that "Closer" bore some similarity with "Lost in translation" and yet not find such parallelism, maybe just unhappiness are the protagonists and that not everything is always as easy as the film made us believe. One of my fears was as he was going to see a play so like this on screen, represented as everything happens at a dozen scenarios, (created especially for the occasion thanks to the bulging budget), where most raw the dialog that sets, perhaps this dialogue sometimes suffers from chabacanas expressions which certainly does not cease to be peculiarly beautiful, that show in some other time the brutality of one or another character (the Larry played by the "King Arthur" Clive Owen). We can travel in the film between very peculiar personalities, between brutality already annotated Owen (perhaps what I least liked of him was his way to change responses, so quickly), youth insecurity of Alice / Jane (Natalie Portman) that reminds me of some person that shared a year of my life, the instability of Jude Law (neither with you nor without you have my remedy evils) and the adult affirmation of Julia Robertsknowing full well that he wants anytime, but end up making up its sad error. One of those movies not rang with too much force and currently leads two Golden Globes, one for Portman and another for Owen, though perhaps, as a negative note is that brutal change of emotion in the characters in some moments of footage. Closer, in some real way as life itself. |
2,540 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/527 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | La increíble historia de Caperucita Roja | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Miramax executives have given in the diana: have rewritten the epic tales of yesteryear with modern dressings. | What brings head to the multinationals of the entertainment made in USA is to provide with the magic formula that leads from hand to parents and children to the tail of the film and then leaving all cheerful entertainment, happy as tambourines at a village fair. Until Shrek, to my mind, nobody came up with this potion. Walt Disney opened gap. Nobody discusses worth movies Wizard of the cartoon, color correction, his workshop of future geniuses, but there has been little intergenerational consensus and when it leaves the joyful father, the child is bored. Or vice versa. It is very difficult to harmonize vices.Now this is style: multifamily cocktail, domestic gazpacho. This little Red Riding Hood is a smart jumble of several ingredients, all of which are intended to be content to a section of the tribe, which acoquina the quarterfinals without metaphysics to entertain the afternoon of Sunday. And if it rains, better still Freud, clearly. And the deconstruction of Derrida, if we bother to the intellectual who, reluctantly, comes to the film to the amusement of his offspring, but ultimately, is an animated film, and well done, of course. Very well made, I would add, but it is missing a good dramatic sense and does not forgive the go puzzle of doctored personalities. Gags are the righteous, and some had already heard them before, but we don't remember in what movie.Everything well, artificial and cold, without content in excess to anyone, but enjoying it as strictly necessary to all. And there is some humor. And even his pinch of sex, conveniently lightened of thickness so that it enters the domestic baggage without excesses. Miramax executives have given in the diana: have rewritten the epic tales of yesteryear with modern dressings. The possibility that one day end up so modernity gorger and want our children to see on screen the original hood, the original Wolf and the three little pigs before.Critical consequence that some spend, the incredible but true story of little Red Riding Hood will be a speech experiment, an absolute boutade not suitable for purists, but I insist (and lately I have this concept quite clear) that the film is, above all, entertainment.As it is not del olmo to ask pears, be it in light entertainment, but our movie fan concern not fed with wolves and grandmothers: prefer harder, much more addictive drugs pearls of Orson Welles with texts by Shakespeare, superb interpretations of Max Von Sydow in Swedish films of the sixties, robberies in racetracks filmed by Kubrick, who do not have wine and bottles which Hitchcock used to revive the Philo of the cold war and the nazi resurgence... Anyway, you take their children to this multicultural Frankenstein, telling them that when they are older, the film will them happy and that this happiness will to them, also, more intelligent, more free. If the gentle reader not have progeny that sit in seat, see Alatriste, which is still running. More exploited euros – is that it is longer. Ah, the protagonist talks weird. The characters of Perrault, not.And there is always the dvd for the saddest nights. I think Blade Runner to be Replicants dreams. |
2,541 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/864 | Pablo López | Munich | 5 | 5 | muchocine | When everything pointed to 'Munich' was going to be the new masterpiece of the already alone master Spielberg, was the date of the premiere, and was not only confirmed, but they exceeded by far the adjective | It is difficult to criticize or comment of a film when it ends out of the film, but the clothes still wet from the flood than I expected to exit I write this, because it is certainly a worthy film of this, this, and much more.When everything pointed to 'Munich' was going to be the new masterpiece of the already alone master Spielberg, came the date of the release, and not only confirmed, but exceeded by far the adjective 'masterpiece' and became something much larger. A film about the revenge is a very risky project, and a movie about revenge and that also include Israelis and Palestinians could easily be considered to be 'time bomb'. But there is nothing impossible for Steven Spielberg.Siendo sincere, none of what he says of this director will be new, and will not be comparable to what has given us with this film. Spielberg is simple and simply an immeasurable, brilliant, masterful, director which gives this film a visual force and a formidable pace, three hours glued to the seat without blinking will fail with any camera coup. The film is a slap in the face to the morale of all moderately sane human being, an ode to peace, a critique of violence without sense, and above all a touch of attention to the human being, the only animal that stumbles twice with the same stone. Indeed, the scene of Eric Bana with the father of Louis (' you can call me Pope '), is very similar to the conversation about the socks between Morgan Freeman and Clint Eastwood in 'Million Dollar Baby', a cornerstone of the narrative, that glimpse of great features two characters, and the group they represent.Janusz Kaminski acquires, with this work, the master category, showing different pictures (that can be misplaced at the beginning) depending on the environments of the film, but all, and I repeat, all, worthy of the most absolute mastery. Already demonstrated with 'The war of the worlds', show disappointing landscapes, some cities destroyed really fine, but the picture of this film narration gives an atmosphere really intriguing to the purest style of film noir and intrigue.John Williams is another true to Spielberg projects, and how it could be otherwise shows a score which, while showing discrete in the story, is very effective and really beautiful. The music appears when it needed, and collaborates to the rhythm of the film with cuts worthy of the best films of intrigue, the best thrillers and undoubtedly the best Williams. Special mention deserves Rick Carter, the artistic director of the film, Spielberg also contributor in other projects, which makes us believe that Spielberg had this film hidden 33 years and that he recorded while the events took place there by the year 1972 and later.In short, a masterpiece more master Spielberg, accompanied once again by the maestro Williams and that with the collaboration of great Janusz Kaminski and an artistic direction that make mella, bring us a movie that won't leave anyone indifferent. A mature movie, a committed film, a film valiant, and ultimately, a necessary and essential film.To leave the film I thought, and I write it here. Having seen that seem to be two clear favorite for the Academy (the Cowboys by critics) and this for me, I must tell you that if it were up for me, 'Munich' would be the big winner of the night, as in none, and Yes, I said well, none of the nominables aspects, can even 'Brokeback Mountain' make shade for a film like this. This Yes it is risky, this do is transgress the minds of American scholars, and not what the Taiwanese Ang Lee and his pair of jeans of dubious sexual identity strain as masterpiece. |
2,542 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/760 | Daniel Galindo | El corral | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Fun and recommended beef story of overcoming. Films for children like this that does not insult their intelligence with jokes facilones are appreciated. | Films for children like this that does not insult their intelligence with jokes facilones that dot boring frames are appreciated. Get to know them, Aesop and safe Iriarte who would have dedicated them many of his fables. Moreover, if they lived and to have audiovisual culture, each animal of this curious farm would star at least one short film. With pace, used the surprises and playing with regarding film that among children they can pass unnoticed, this film connects with others such as Chicken Run (evasion on the farm), although more by that theme by the way already in this respect it reminds Jimmy Neutron, the same Director.After a recurring title hides a world that can not accessible to humans. Stevie Wonder composed the tracks on the album the secret life of plants, suggestive phrase which undersigned provokes images of flowers and shrubs with personality, such as which discovers Alice in her wandering around the country of wonders. Something so with this portrait of usos y costumbres bestial is not more than a vision of the most hidden life of animals. Having children as a target group, there are archetypal patterns, although it is not the most outstanding point of this fun beef story of overcoming. Policymakers seem to not care that cows with their udders and all, are male. This can confuse especially small. Inconsistency, but at the end and the place is one license more like them that have allowed the dubbers Spanish in its decision to impose a Galician accent to an unusual trio formed by three cows (males) mad.At times it becomes something excessive for its mellow ravings. History oozes moralina, not many, but enough to check which is the Lion King harvest. Here isn't Simba seeking the comfort and support of his father, lost in the firmament, but Otis resembles much the leoncito of the Disney in certain sequences. We know that references the current film lives and this work is full of them, although they also abound the hilarious moments provided by a ferret eager to sink the teeth to a pessimistic chicken. Fun and recommended. |
2,543 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4347 | Moebius | El bueno, el feo y el malo | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Critical vapuleó the film, but the public responded in an enthusiastic manner. Thereafter the American western never again be the same. As it was not the career of Clint, an actor who had yet gain recognition in his country. | After finishing the filming of death had priced Clint Eastwood remained a while in Rome to participate in the witches, an Italian film divided into chapters which would in turn directed by different directors. Eastwood worked under the orders of Vittorio De Sica portraying a normal and somewhat boring husband who neglects his wife after many years of marriage. After finishing the job, he returned to the United States, where you would find that it was now the main protagonist of the television series Rawhide. His partner had been dismissed. Eastwood was now the protagonist. Meanwhile his two films with director Sergio Leone were still not released. In his country, Eastwood was just a familiar face that appeared on television once a week.Meanwhile, in Italy, several North American producers had stalked Leone to lead a new western. Offering a great budget, bigger than I could ever imagine, the director and Italian producers soon accept the offer. Interested in demystifying the difference between good and evil and the topics linked to the western, the director wanted to shoot a story about three Grifters, three gunmen who are not what they seem, and that depending on the circumstances can be generous or cruel. The director wanted a mixture between the picaresque tradition and the drama of a bloody civil war. That would be the starting point for developing the new script. The story would be titled "The magnificent two harapientos", title which was changed before you start shooting.The film deemed the futility and cruelty of wars ("never saw that so many lives malgastaran so vain", says more or less one of the characters) with the picaresque and the low morale of the protagonists of the film. The gunmen, capable of murdering, cheating and stealing, are still well, more human and worthy than wars and those causing them. In the tradition of Hollywood the American civil war, when he had adapted for the big screen, had always to do with moral values and the construction of a new nation. Heroism and sacrifice. However, Leone was ready to do anything heroic portrait, where the war of Fund that takes place in the film is reduced to the dead and dust. Orson Welles told Sergio that making a film about the civil war was "crazy". Except for what the wind, no film dealing with the subject had triumphed at the North American box office.As regards the distribution, the role of the "good" was reserved for Clint Eastwood. However, this time, Eastwood was not so eager to accept. While the previous films had been premiered in North America and having become the protagonist of the series, Rawhide, the actor feared that the that you get to associate with B-movies Italian could damage the future of his career. On the other hand, he also expressed his doubts about its role, that it seemed that the real hero was Tuco, "the ugly". The own Leone had to travel to United States and convince Eastwood that he accepted the role. But both ended up discussing what the wife of Leone described as "a clash of male egos". Eastwood agreed to sign, but it assured of bagging a high sum for his involvement in the film.For the role of "the bad", Leone had hesitated to work with Lee Van Cleef again. He tried to sign Charles Bronson once more, and this time it had accepted, but contractual incompatibilities made it impossible to make it available. Leone, entrusted the role of judgment to the good of Lee.Por last, for portraying Tuco Benedicto Pacific Juan Maria Ramirez, I had thought originally in Gian Maria Volontè, but Leone wanted an actor with more comic vis. The chosen was Eli Wallach, prestigious Actor's Studio from actor and which had already been a bandit in the magnificent seven. Anyway, Leone chose him for his role in "The railways", episode in the conquest of the West, and where Wallach left Leone impressed by his capacity for mimicry. Wallach, who then felt pigeonholed as the eternal Latin Bandit, at the same time was difficult to mold his theatrical style to the technicality of Hollywood. Eli wanted to return to the film, but again came a director, this time Italian with an Italian paper. Leone begged to before agreeing to see any of his films. That was all what was enough to Eli Wallach to accept work in the good, the bad and ugly evil.Wallach and Leone congeniaron quickly, and during his stay in Rome the script underwent important changes. Director and actor it is spent in great playing and contrasting ideas for the character of Tuco. The bandit would be an atheist but at the same time superstitious who not to extensive, rather than a belt has shoulder straps and belt and takes the pistol hanging from a rope.As it had feared Eastwood, Tuco became the central character of the film. The best quotes and scenes had to do with the mischievous Bandit. The enormous talent of Wallach managed to move from the Centre of attention to eternal "the man without a name" Eastwood. So the tensions between it and Leone continued during filming, although Clint not only did not show any antipathy to Wallach, but helped him advising him and giving him ideas for his character. Anyway, the long filming of the good, the ugly and the marked the swan song for the collaboration between Eastwood and Leone. The progressive diminution of the role of the Californian ("if I continue this in the next film will be accompanied by all the American Cavalry") and the friction between the actor and director marked the end of a wonderful symbiosis that gave the big three film western, to each of which better. Eastwood and Leone grew to see up, shortly before the death of the Italian left to eat at a restaurant in Rome. Despite that sour final Eastwood always had good words for Leone, with never denied what they had learned during the European shooting: the economy of means, a different way of working, freer than in the old Hollywood, and a way of portraying the raw violence and openly. He was also with Leone developed the archetype of his hard and silent characters, and it was also shooting those western where he met the interesting thing might be the dual characters. As he had done practically since the beginning of his career, Eastwood did study work and ways of working of Leone. The bug of the address would reconcomiendo the actor a few years more.The good, the bad and ugly evil premiered on Italy in late 1966 and constituted a new success, although it grossed less that the death had a price. Meanwhile, solved the legal problems with Akira Kurosawa, producer Alberto Grimaldi, who had finally made with the rights of the three films of Leone, sold to United Artists. In this way the three films were marketed in the United States as a trilogy, and for advertising purposes was when coined the phrase that would give immortality to the Eastwood character: "the man with no name". Critique vapuleó to the movies, but the public responded in an enthusiastic manner. Thereafter the American western never again be the same. As it was not the career of Clint Eastwood, an actor of by then 36 years who still had failed to obtain recognition in his country for his work on the big screen. |
2,544 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1462 | Matías Cobo | El Motorista Fantasma (Ghost Rider) | 2 | 5 | muchocine | You're empachado both visual trick computer generated and have found no hint of epic or emotion on a tape which, precisely, should offer both qualities in abundance. | The cyclic premiere of a film based on a comic book superhero he remains very profitable film, but such overabundance may be harmful by repetition of diagrams and narrative styles in each new installment. Possibly the cause of the adaptations are increasingly routine is at the origin of these projects, almost all as the beginning of a sequel that bring considerable commercial revenues. With each coming-out of a hero of vignettes is anxious to constitute a franchise. And thus these deliveries on the origin of the characters tend to copy each other in their structures and contents. Do we start with the character without their superpowers, we explain the trauma? should it have? which you are awarded the same, and then the story follows the predictable course of a hero ajustice their antagonists and fights evil.The Ghost Rider continues to imply this script and for his argument, has chosen to take ideas from the recent comics of this character, developed in urban environments, and discard (less a shy nod of the film) the first? and better? comic recreated in solitary and arid deserts. Throughout the game that this character could be offered by the ambivalence that occurs between the rider Acrobat Johnny Blaze and the evil entity that takes over, a Mefistófeles sicario is going to fret by incompetence of the screenwriter or the business need of creating a film to audiences of all ages; bet without hesitation to this adaptaciones-molde to respond more to this last cause.From the choice of the cast already it warns a whiff little bold in this new 'mainstream-comiquero'. Nicolas Cage, who lost the ass for sink the teeth to a superhero again last thread and with a junkie's own gestures. Peter Fonda, lost in the rush of 'tv-movies' American returns to the Hollywood universe to make Mefistófeles. The rebel son of American Beauty, Wes Bentley, who also walked a tad gone, makes wrong as the son of the devil. And the voluptuous Eva Mendes (a woman to remove the hiccups) obediently assumes the Protocol role of beautiful girlfriend of the hero of yore.Thus, at the end you're empachado both visual trick computer generated and have found no hint of epic or emotion on a tape which, precisely, should offer both qualities in abundance. That's the 'cine-cómic' me starting to bore. |
2,545 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/713 | Jeremy Fox | El laberinto del fauno | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Film hard, very hard. Prodigious fable. Accurate portrait of a time and the nature of the military who, through a coup d ' état, dictatorially ruled the country for nearly forty years. | It is curious to see how, for very trite and exhausted that it seems to be a theme, just always getting someone with the talent necessary to give a new and innovative approach. That is, precisely, what did Guillermo del Toro with the Spanish civil war in "El Laberinto de el Fauno".The film is a tale with two parts well differentiated, a realistic and another fantastic cutting, better integrated for what at first glance appears. I say it because the most obvious problem of the film would be little integration between the imaginary world of the protagonist and the real world. I could not help feeling that problem to see the movie, but like I said, after thinking calmly I have come to the conclusion that it is not as serious as it may seem. An example: the adventure of the protagonist with the banquet which cannot touch (magnificent tribute to "Alice's adventures in Wonderland") takes place just when she is punished without dinner by Captain Vidal (a Sergi López who would represent the monster come-hadas in the real world). I think a second and attentive viewing so that it may be necessary to do justice to the film, but for now, we continue talking about it.The work of direction of Guillermo del Toro is brilliant. Its way to introduce the themes, characters and details (the knife, medicines, keys) integrating them perfectly in the story placed you in the Group of elected globally in terms of narrative capacity.If those virtues were not sufficient, del Toro appears to be a wonderful director of actors that extract a few outstanding performances of all of them. Although Ariadna Gil and Ivana Baquero are fine, I would highlight a few magnificent Álex Angulo and Maribel Verdú in two endearing characters of those with which it is very easy to identify. And, above all, Sergi López spread its shadow throughout the film and composing an anthological character. Nothing in the film is more scary than his gaze, his movements, his obsession with the clock of his father or the coldness with which it is able to perform the most cruel and barbaric acts imaginable.In a movie with a fantastic component so marked, it is always important to the work of the team of special effects, art direction, sound, makeup, etc. Even more so in a tape of this kind which, to the fantastic slope, we add a realistic component. As well, this film demonstrates, once again, that in Spain can check movies with a finish so perfect as any Hollywood superproduccion.Film hard, very hard. Prodigious fable. Accurate portrait of a time and the nature of the military who, through a coup d ' état, dictatorially ruled the country for nearly forty years. All this and more is "El Laberinto de el Fauno". For me, so far, the best film of Guillermo del Toro. |
2,546 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2129 | Taliesin | Zodiac | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Zodiac puts the viewer in the skin of the researchers who worked in the case of the multiple murderer who performed in San Francisco at the end of the 1960s. And he does it with such luxury of details that is overwhelming. | Hits theaters the last tape of the director of jewels like Se7en, The Game and the Club of the fight. In the light of these three films, it is clear that David Fincher likes the complex plots, with turns and in which nothing is what it seems. It also seems that in his film the characters are above everything else, though without neglecting an artistic direction that provides lot of realism to his works. With this in mind, we can say that Zodiac is the sublimation of his way of understanding the film, Zodiac is based on the true story of the multiple murderer. It is not the first time that a film is inspired in this particular killer series, Dirty Harry or the Exorcist III already approached the character, although they did so with a very cinematographic language, while Fincher to bet on a near approach to the documentary.And this is Zodiac remains with scrupulous fidelity events and research surrounding this mysterious character at the end of the 1960s and during the 1970s. And this is the main attractive and shock of the film. Since that you see on screen credits well-established await us two and a half hours of police investigation that in many moments reminded me to JFK or the dilemma, which possibly will deter many viewers. No matter whatever you sell it: Zodiac isn't a thriller. Those who accept this last and approach the film will find a great movie, a lovingly placed in the characters and the setting as we rarely see.The film is based on real events and as real life is brutal at times, but without recreating in easy blood. In fact, Fincher bet by the psychology of the assassin, putting the spectator on the side of those who seek to unravel the mind of the psychopath. There are no spectacular findings, miracle resolutions, nor incredible twists. The director has not given or a bit of margin to the usual cinematographic resources and has followed police investigations and the book by Robert Graysmith. Of course, in a movie as based on the characters needed some outstanding performances and so are those of Jake Gyllenhaal, Mark Ruffalo and Robert Downey Jr., with a role that comes as a ring to the finger. To highlight the artistic direction that the passage of nearly two decades in the city of San Francisco has captured brilliantly and allowing the viewer travel thirty years ago, when mobile phones and computer files were thing of science fiction. The appearance of almost documentary is accentuated with a full picture flat media and without too many tricks.In short, Zodiac is a film with a comprehensive and complex plot, as it is the reality. Its main virtue and at the same time default, depending on the Viewer, is the zero concession to entertainment film, it does not mean that it is not entertaining. That Yes, to enjoy everything what offers requires us great attention and yet is not easy follow everything that happens on the screen. Nevertheless, if we are not losing the thread too will succeed understand why Zodiac crimes have become the obsession of many in the last forty years. |
2,547 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3992 | Ivan Villamel | Jindabyne | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A new display of privileged domain of the description of characters through a narrative slow in appearance, but stormy emotional decline. | After surprise friends and strangers with that excellent thriller of name "Lantana", filmed in the year 2001, five long years had to elapse until that Australian Ray Lawrence has had the opportunity to prove their worth in film-making, in this case recovering the dense and complex tone of his previous work to take it furtherIf it fits, in a new show of privileged domain of the description of characters through a narrative slow in appearance, but stormy emotional decline.The story of Stewart, Carl and Billy, Rocco, situated to these four friends in one of their routine meetings of fishing weekend, in which, by random chance, discovered the lifeless body of a young topless woman in the isolated rio of the desolate place that serves as their escape to their routine and sad lives, a place in which to escape from their daily chores. The decision agreed to leave the body there awaiting his return from weekend, unleashes an aerated reaction not only from relatives and friends, but the Australian Aboriginal community. No one understands the reasons which led to these four friends to ignore the fact and continue with its weekend of entertainment outside the moral dilemmas posed by its decision.In his work as director in the film before us, Lawrence shows possess a difficult virtue which few current directors have, give it to your staging calmly and outstanding close-ups with the reactions of the characters, a fantastic look, full of puns and hidden feelings under a tangle of contrasting emotions. Occasionally a mise en scene and a classic narrative pulse are not hotly contested with personality that can exercise a filmmaker in the final product, and the work in this great film by Lawrence, is worthy of recognition.The film takes place in slow, almost desperate way probably for the new film buffs eager for extreme sensations, as alien to all prevailing fashion in the times, but not so is sterile in reaching the most tanning spectator in this type of storytelling with your message. This extraordinary capacity possessing the film to convey the sense of apprehension always reminds that maxim of David Lynch (always so revered in showing the most hidden part of the human soul), in which every person has its history, its past in the form of constant threat that sleeps dormant to resurface someday, but in the form of real and tangible threat, emotional and destructive level if internally. During the footage, Lawrence shows us the daily evolution of a small Australian community through silences in epochal talks, looks lost in search of a release emotional and spiritual that it compensate internal bitterness that breathe each and every one of the characters in the film. This fantastic look manifests itself on-screen in the form of threat invisible, giving the sensation that something is going to rob us with extreme virulence, with an air of bitterness at all times. From the first to the last character of the film, giving the sense of hide things from his past, implying, that behind every door of each of our houses, a sad story is hidden.Mention apart for the great acting cast that knows to give all and each of the characters of his own personality, without be swallowed up by this transcendental tone of the film look of its director, while Gabriel Byrne and Laura Linney, a step above the already if large cast, with action sublime in its subtlety, a wonderful recreation of a marriage in crisiswith those emotional that sooner or later criticisms come to light at the least opportune moment.It is also clear that such successful work of actors, would be impossible without a solvent script, and in this case is not less true that the libretto by Beatrix Christian (based on a short history of Raymond Carver, title "So Much Water So Close to Home"), a gradual and surprising description of day to day of these failed characters, is careful to detailresulting in a story that begins brilliantly and just sad way and desesperanzadora (despite spiritual and metaphorical flat end), a gem we.By so wise direction, screenplay and acting level, obvious references to this great Australian film can pass unnoticed at first glance, but it is clear that this blend of intimist drama and Aboriginal mysticism, baby clearly the film one of the most prestigious filmmakers emerged from the Antipodes, the essential Peter Weir for his early work in his native Australia, "Picnic at Hanging Rock" and above all, "The last wave", with item Fund in both cases Aboriginal.If there is an element that prevents this film to achieve even higher levels of quality as film piece, it is precisely the change of registration in certain passages of the film, despite the fact that they aren't unsatisfactory, perhaps smaller some variation of pace narrative, in order to be more effective the alleged blows of effect, which here fade to create a tone uniform throughout the story. It is shown as pending the film for the soul of the characters, that isolated occasionally forgets what it means to the narrative pulse. A lesser evil in any case, does not prevent the enjoyment of such an interesting film.Ultimately, absolutely recommended film, mixes intimist and mild complaint social, disguised in the form of racial thriller that will be a real treat for those who still love the narrative and classic cinema, one that opts for tell small stories of paused and way more emotional in the characters that effect not effective blows of effect pending, or free script drafts. The film is likely to be misunderstood by a sector of the audience raised faster Assembly and current narrative, at the risk of being considered "slow", which nothing further from the truth, because the film stands out certainly above the average of recent films, regardless of their nationality. A fully recommended, multi work (although without reaching the level of impact of his earlier, and essential, "Lantana") fairly in various competitions. A small great film notable and essential. |
2,548 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2045 | Hombre Lobo | El retorno de los malditos | 1 | 5 | muchocine | A sequel that not only throw overboard all the virtues of the tape of Aja, but is also strong candidate for more bland and infumable we had to swallow in so far this year. | Wes Craven, the man who had the opportunity to do the same movie twice, charged along with his son to write the screenplay for the sequel the hills have eyes (2006), the successful remake directed Alexandre Aja one of their classic setenteros. Under normal circumstances, the hand of Uncle Wes would be a reason to trust in the quality of a movie, and if I say "under normal circumstances" is because we all know very well that Wes Craven today is light years of the of thirty years ago. Man we have today is someone who is in franca decline and has given to the fret with our hopes on more than one occasion, either as director, producer and screenwriter. Said this should go to the point: the return of the damned (2007) is a sequel not only throwing overboard all the virtues of the tape of Aja, but it also is a strong candidate to more bland and infumable we had to swallow in so far this year.And worst of all is that Wes it was easy, as much that it attempted to, this sequel (in an incomprehensible marketing move has been named Spain as the return of the damned when the easiest thing would have been placed a "2" to the title already had) could not be worse than that which he himself directed in 1985famous not only for being one of the most solid jumbles of 1980s, but also for being the only tape of history (as far I know) in which a dog has a flashback (!). There's nothing that, as from the outset aims to emulate the intense and frenzied style of Aja and take it to the next level. Charge of the address is the German Martin Weisz (best director of Sitges film Grimm Love (2006), which I have not seen), shadowed the visual style of the film predecessor to looking for addition a claustrophobic atmosphere very in line with The Descent (2005). Unfortunately, the results can not be more disastrous.Instead of a family of bystanders unawares, the protagonists of this film are a group of novice recruits of the National Guard panels to provide supplies to a group of scientists who lived in the hills of New Mexico. What are, in contrast, is massacred scientists and themselves prey to another family of mutant cannibals, who will face if they wish to survive. From the outset, this is already the first error: by making the protagonists a group of soldiers with weapons and training to kill, the sequel strips to the history of its human component, moving any empathy that can feel the viewer towards the characters. If we add to that the mutants are represented as real giants who lack little to have superpowers, we find that interesting primitive confrontation of the first part is here reduced to a typical monster movie, only that badly made. The face to face between the beasts and soldiers going through each and every one of the clichés of this type of films during an desganada address and a plot that moves almost by inertia. To make matters worse, the soldiers are so frankly stupid that fifteen minutes not only don't we feel pity for them, but we wish them openly the worst of luck. I am not exaggerating when I say that these bogus soldiers pose a greater danger for themselves than the savage cannibals that are hidden in the caves.As a good representative of his time, the movie nor spared in the offal and rugged situations. Only the first scene is quite hard to bear (which, not deny it, look good at the beginning,) but after seeing all of the tape one could not but admit that you it's a shock therapy quite clear that attempts to cover the countless shortcomings of the film by appealing to the easy impact. There is also here a bloody rape scene, of course much more explicit in the first part and with a greater emphasis on the pleasure of the attacking beast, which he even hangs very calculated thread of baba from the mouth.The question I have is if really (as I have read in some places) the film tries to sneak an anti-war message to us about the invasion on hostile ground at the hands of American troops always lists, reading that not only I have heard about this film but also about other next premiere, 28 weeks later (2007). If so, I think a message quite poor and the exploitation of the deaths of the soldiers through the childish method show them as a band of rednecks who deserve the fate falls on them seems to me not only ineffective, but also somewhat miserable. The return of the damned is, in this sense and any other an absurdly forgettable, mediocre and surplus film that can happen without any charge of consciousness. It seems to me that Wes Craven will take a long time to return to lift head. |
2,549 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2908 | Plissken | La extraña que hay en tí | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Failed history of revenge, with a pair of joke notable and not a few moments. And again, quite boring. | Already 30 years of the Spain of 'Taxi Driver', the movie premiere that he put on the map to Jodie Foster. Now, it is Iris who plays to righteous overnight in New York of the 21st century, and not his "beloved" Travis Bickle. Ironies of fate. 'The Brave One' ('The strange there is en TI' will be called around here) tells the story of Erica Bain, radio announcer to the "green dog" in the Big Apple that is dragged to a vendetta against the worms that live in it. But now their main enemy is not the offender, but the law, personified in the detective Mercer, a relentless police struggling to overcome her divorce. Good, and catch the night watchman, also.Irregular Neil Jordan launches to go with ex officio and little more it seems an adult review of the popular righteous saga of Charles Bronson. The typical situation of the character that crosses the line unfolds with the traumas it brings such tremendous decision in a normal and ordinary, citizen trying to convince us that all we can happen the same. But to do so, 'The strange there is en TI' uses all topics of this type of film: everything is evil around Erica, their executions are never unjustified; Police officers, although they want to capture the murderer, in the background are happy someone clean the streets; the righteous is never betrayed by victims who rescues. and clear, realistic proposal of Jordan just resembling, and too much, this jewel of ochentera dandruff of video store called 'Angel 2' or the above-mentioned films of Bronson. Because if this is a reflection on the (in) therapeutic usefulness of revenge, you left this incredibly orthopedic end. And if it is an exaltation of the same, prefer to Paul Kersey with a missile before that to Erica Bain with a 9 mm.The technical aspect, that Yes, it is well maintained. Photography Philippe Rousselot is dark enough (not blue) and realistic to immerse ourselves in the progressive collapse of the protagonist. For my taste they emphasize too much the mental instability of the speaker with these swinging movements of camera, but that said, matter of taste.And as it is normal in a film produced by Jodie Foster, she is the main attraction of the film. It seems that he intends to seek another oscar via 'Accused', and at times (his stories on the radio and some moments) shines. But the transformation of his character does much harm to their interpretation: trembling apprentice killer goes to Mrs. Majestik (including lapidary phrases) in only a handful of assassinations, and takes away much, but a lot of credibility to the tortured announcer. Other, with a correct Terrence Howard at the helm, are just that, others. Well, it must mention Naveen Andrews, which in only a film has become sensitive and exotic lover of scientific cortapelotas (Planet Terror).Finally, failed history of revenge, with a pair of joke notable and not a few moments. And again, quite boring. A 4. |
2,550 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/764 | Daniel Galindo | Jackass 2 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | This excessive mixing between laughter, embarrassment and disgust is not more than a surrealist and insulting, blows, testing wild and bloody tinker Carnival that does not deserve to reach the charts. | Grace is there, but it is so apparent that it not supported a feature film made by pieces engarzadas with the unique storyline of unconsciousness. Do more hard is that its proponents are not: know very well that the people retorcerá in the armchair at the time that ask for more and more, which gives idea of comparison with the? bread and circuses? of our ancient Romans so the populace saw no further from what their leaders are interested in to see.The leaders are a few thugs producers of MTV, television channel which has seen rises the audience with a group of Stooges able to do whatever. It is their religion, which leads them to put a leech on his eye that chupe blood, tear out teeth and vomit after. Vomiting, in short, that already gives quite disgusting!They smeared money to their foolish guinea pigs and leave them at home: what are you able to overcome with more wild proof? Well here. They have no any appreciation for your skin, your body. Something that comes from long ago: I thought that he would be lost not having seen the first part, but not. That Yes, an unknown force seizes us once inside the room, that they snagged the crap, each more absurd than the previous one. Do one of the graces may be in the dubbing into Spanish: professionals strive to provide their voices of that tontorrón tone that is sure have the possible original.¿Es version a spectator mimics the nonsense that hour and half occur on screen? We assume no, but we will not be any form of stupid life censors. Yes recommend us spending a single euro in this dubious work shot camera in hand, with close-ups and the signing of types such as Spike Jonze, as if this would constitute any warranty. |
2,551 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3305 | Mario | Saw 4 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | While not he harbored hopes of the plot I hooked, itself at least hoped to find a good serving of sophisticated torture ready to be degustadas. Unfortunately, this time neither one nor the other. | Before gutting the fourth installment of Saw IV should clarify that he hurts from this rostrum criticize a saga of this caliber. LF and devoid of any kind of claim terror sagas are, as you know, much appreciated here, and the wanderings of Jigsaw (now converted into a parody of themselves) seems confirmed that they will arrive at least until his sixth delivery.Saw movies meet many of the requirements to become a legendary franchise in the style of Friday the 13th and nightmare on Elm Street: General characteristics Subrayadísimas, as the generosity when it comes to show blood and viscera (touching the gore in the third installment and seriously attenuated in the latter) the succession of deliveries without almost time for respitethe exploitation of the moderately surprising successes of the first part and the inevitable lack of coherence and claims, are shown on each of the films without any trap or cardboard. Saw doesn't fool anyone (at least no longer) and the spectator who comes to the room should be prepared for what you are going to offer.However, despite my appreciation for the bet casquera representing these tapes, can not help feel disappointed by its fourth installment. If in Saw III had relegated almost completely the spirit close to the thriller that could guess slightly in previous deliveries (mostly the first) by placing almost 100 percent of the action in a succession of the most macabre and hilarious torture, Saw IV replicates these more or less autoparódicos channels towards an indefinable style.The film again seeks to become strong in the final surprise, with more vigor that never in fact, becoming the script an impossible to gibberish by who has not seen the previous deliveries. It gives the feeling of that Darren Lynn Bousman seeks to recover the seriousness and grant a spirit of geometric building, designed as a whole from the start to the series of films. This claim, if it is it would fall under its own weight with a script that you know, if possible, more crazy than ever: the bulk of the plot is based on a policeman following scary puzzles, step-by-step plans and without skip one comma, totally and absolutely implausible, and, as on previous occasions, the narrative jumps between parallel stories focusing, in the second instance, the outrageous and unjustified (at least not correctly) origin of the psychopath.Again a surprising and unexpected ending adorns and accelerates the closure of the movie with two surprises this time, a quite interesting related to the timeline and the other, resobada and above more stupid than ever, concerning the characters. All this sprinkled with the already famous and effective melody marks House.In the visual section the movie loses many integers with respect to its predecessors. Devised by Jigsaw traps are unavoidable on this occasion; virtually no importance is given to the torture and most of the games are not too castings and they are very confusing. With the exception of one or two macabre jokes in the rest costs know the procedure to be taken by the victim, and above all shot with a crazy camera that stands before the clarity of situations. If it were not for the initial autopsy, strong point of the movie, the disappointment would be irreconcilable.Ultimately, even seeing Saw IV with a compassionate look, counsel as I consider myself of such proposals, not finished follow the thread to the director. While not he harbored hopes of the plot I hooked, itself at least hoped to find a good serving of sophisticated torture ready to be degustadas. Unfortunately, this time neither one nor the other. |
2,552 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/521 | Ibán Manzano | World Trade Center | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Stone may think it is a good documentary which only tells the truth, but on the contrary, should remind you that instead it is telling us that he thinks that it must have been that day. | Sensing already the potential narrative could have the new attacks in this 21st century, March 11 witnesses referred to mobile terminals that continued playing on the side of corpses as a magical realism of García Márquez more bleak. On 11 September, the 11-M matrix, deserved before appropriating copyright of these stories. World Trade Center already adds the second film about the 11-S, but this is the first involving a speech, a direct response.World Trade Center shares with United 93 intuition that what happened can not understand in a single story, and before that is limited from its approach to a vantage point: the debris of the twin towers. The cinema of catastrophes, the Chronicle however objective, Elliptically narrated snapshots are not there, and instead subliman in the form of family tragedy, of exemplary family tragedy. The two characters in the film do not offer even different perspectives of the same event, unlike the scheme is repeated mimetically in both; as only had another possible answer. Good, if any, of the marine; a real character that seems however impostado in final assembly. Stone may think that it is a good documentary which only tells the truth, but far from it, should remember that instead it is telling us what he thinks he should or at least it should have been that day. |
2,553 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/784 | Otis B. Driftwood | Scoop | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Allen again, nothing, to delight us with a good invoice job, it is not bad bearing in mind that it is going to pace of film per year. | This is a film of Woody "normalità", which in my own scale of values means that it is worth the price of admission. Without being even remotely of the good of the director of Brooklyn, the fact is that tells the story works, is simple, unpretentious, fun without falling into the grotesque and adds the speck of intrigue that came so well in "Mysterious murder in Manhattan", adding more suspense with unequal fortune.But it is also a romantic comedy, field in which Allen isn't safe specialist of collateral form, or if you like inherent to most of his film, in the sense that there is always a story of love kicking during the footage and that serves to especiar the plot. Here is part main of what counts, both or more than the history of research, and this allows to become more involved with the characters that if had been limited to tell the story of this aspiring journalist, Sondra (Scarlett Johansson) who, in the most unusual way, stumbles upon what may be the pitch information of his life. Determined to get the exclusive of the unmasking of a serial killer, just falling for the main suspect, Peter (Hugh Jackman) and is submerged in a dilemma between their feelings and the ability to be getting into the bed of a dangerous criminal.Woody Allen here again in front of the cameras, reserving a small but juicy role as Splendini, an unlikely conjurer that malvive of the cheaper tricks of the genre. As you can see, a mattress perfect to bounce the neuro to which we are accustomed. In his eagerness to help Sondra despite the Funk feel, you will have the opportunity to be ducks on countless occasions, while also getting unexpected success. Provides, therefore the indissoluble comic note of his productions of what you give to call its "third stage" (see the summary on "Mysterious murder in Manhattan") and when it is not Allen onstage (this time leaves little, we suspect that did not tiring), appears his roster of carefully chosen actors to fill the screen. More or less: on the one hand we have Hugh Jackman, who seems to have been paid to the role of Heartthrob when it does not grip of steel and that makes sovereign efforts so not notice you that it is Australian; It is correctito. On the other is Ian McShane as the spirit of the Reporter Joe Strombel, miserable, vile, creeping and effective even after his death, i.e., McShane in its purest form (what a shame to not see him in more movies). A classic, Charles Dance, also appears in a rather testimonial role. And, carrying the weight of history, we have Scarlett, on which I can never be objective but whose freshness and latent sexuality are capable as myself I could watch at the movies, get a murmullante room to stay completely in silence (men and women) when you remove the bathrobe in the pool. I do not deny that the comical vis what is perhaps needed in this kind of films, particularly when your opponent is Woody Allen lacks, but let's be serious. I doubt very much that the viewer wait that it is she who round off the jokes.Allen returns, therefore, to delight us with a good invoice job, it is not nothing wrong taking into account that it is going to pace of film per year (I think that the next is already in Assembly phase) and that also, because of this, can leave you authentic brick type "Celebrity". Moves much better in their histories of ninety minutes and it shows. He repeats his scheme and again, but you have taken so far that it is difficult to it goes you wrong. I will not say that "a masterpiece each year" that tend to drop the phrase enthusiasts, but I do believe that it is fair to recognize that, at least for who this writes, Woody Allen is reason enough to go into the cinema without a shadow of doubt. |
2,554 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1647 | Luis Zueco | El Efecto Mariposa | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A great movie. It is for many reasons. The first and most important for what makes you feel. | Because many people will not be agree with me but for me, this is a great movie. And Moreover, I say this sincerely. A great movie. It is for many reasons. The first and most important for what makes you feel. At this point we all know what is the "butterfly effect", well in its atmospheric aspect (the flutter of a butterfly in New York can cause a hurricane in Tokyo, of done comes the name of "Butterfly", in his "chaos theory" (or as a small change can trigger an infinite disorder) or concerning the spacetime, if we make a small change in the past)so that the future change in an effect chain of unpredictable consequences.In this film feels the effects of this theory in any other who has tried to. This is the main achievement of the tape. Do you feel that each decision in life, every action that you perform, every gesture, Word? You can check the future. Say one thing or another in an instant of your life can mean from dying at a precise moment, to lead a happy life, or living a real hell, from one end to another cone a terrifying ease. In a situation of total chaos. The protagonist uses a few notebooks wrote small to go to the past, always at the same point, and although he always tries to fix things, never succeeds, comes back, and is always worse. As if the past could not, or it should be changed.The excellent end, a way to change things is not with a small change but with a total reversal. And that is what makes the protagonist.But just as there is the butterfly effect also appears at the end a concept unless so interesting and mysterious like him, the destination. As much as we change things as much as we fight the events, if two people have to find is love, sooner or later in New York or Madrid.A also highlight the female protagonist, usual of small beautiful girl in film roles for teenagers, but it shown here very consistent.The excellent soundtrack, especially the final track of Oasis "Spot Cry your Heart out", with the scene where in the street. |
2,555 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1370 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Cry Wolf | 1 | 5 | muchocine | I boot: infamous, banal, hollow, minimum. But after these four denominations, I warn you that my vocabulary will be always extremely short. | By-product of teenage fattening which not is missing almost nothing to be declared the worst movie of recent years. And it also seems that it makes two made. It could have then entered directly on the shelves of dvd in the video shops: there sure has its audience. That how I fell so low? Because the brain sometimes dismissive of cinefilias and other paraphernalia of worship ego all have inside and let it contaminate by peccadilloes innocent for power then (at the café, on the tail of bread, in these rinconcitos of the network) rant to taste and use these adjectives scoundrels who seldom use and we both like.I boot: infamous, banal, hollow, minimum. But after these four denominations, warn that my vocabulary will be always extremely short, prudent in its voluntary harassment, and that there will be someone with more nasty semantic (I have today a happy day and until I can think of two or three bondados of the film, which I am not going to say because'm me not the WINS) that disfigures this grain of pus in the worldwide charts. Served. |
2,556 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4317 | Heitor Pan | Juno | 5 | 5 | muchocine | The screenwriter, Diablo Cody, get a perfect blend of laughter and more tragic moments in one delicious story, perfectly located on the shoulders of a small genius of the interpretation, the amazing Ellen Page. | Normally, I choose the movies that I'll see the film after reading about all the possible options. 6 euros (average) is not feat to go wrong many times, and although there are genres which I am launching head and without float (the horror and science fiction are evidence), I normally know what go the movies before you choose them. So, afterwards, I have the opportunity to compare say what them criticism of professional (and amateur) why not with what I just believe.It is clear that there is always and will have differing points. The discussion of whether the film can be assessed objectively was presented in a discussion I had recently in a forum, or whether, on the contrary, vision, tastes and experiences of each viewer make it impossible. I chose the second option more and therefore understand and appreciate that each movie has its audience and that a film that to me I love to another to loathe.In the case of "Juno", read a series of overlapping opinions on a few occasions, these itself given by the "professional" critique, which fail to understand. Some scholars of the cinema, pointed too listillos dialogues of the protagonist, with the ingenious answer always to point, pro-life air of the tape and try to exploit your independent invoice to the slipstream of hits as "Little Miss Sunshine", in a negative way. But before joining these points, we would point out what is the movie.For reasons not clarified, the sarcastic, acid and independent Juno, for 16 years, she becomes pregnant after her first sexual relationship. After coolly assess the options available to them, decides to go ahead and hand over to his son in adoption to a couple who is looking for a descendant unsuccessfully. In tone of acid comedy, the film explores the relationships of Juno with the different characters that surround: the sympathetic father, stepmother advocate wishful thinking, the "inseminador" shy and good-natured, the rich couple who opt to receive the son in adoption or the intimate friend that supports everything, accompanying her physical and mental over the 9 months of gestation and something else instead.The screenwriter, Diablo Cody (Nom de guerre of Brook Busey), gets a perfect blend of laughter and more tragic moments, but is the sense of humor which are just imposed in one delicious story, perfectly based on the shoulders of a small genius of interpretation, the amazing Ellen Page. discover this fine actress, this month celebrates 21 years, in the uneasy "Hard Candy" where he impressed me, admired as he stole the few scenes in which came in "X-Men 3: the final decision" and "Juno" is over of fall in love. Page is one of those rare actresses that appear to have been born to acting, possessing a crushing naturalness and a magnetism out of the ordinary. If that join you a modest and calm personality (as they have those who know) and a huge ability to choose good roles, we are faced with one more than promising start.Let's now review the points that had been listed at the beginning of the text on the defects pointed to some critics of the film. Firstly, intelligent dialogues and witty responses that have always the protagonist. Strikes me that critics threatening to give birth this feature of the film probably praise fast dialogues of films of Cary Grant or Katherine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy, and are those who cry because already there are no scripts worked as in days gone by. Probably compare this film of the time gold with 'Juno' is a nerve on my part, but do not believe to be so far removed from reality. It is true that quick responses of a teenager of 16 years not usually so scathing and smart, but I do not think that it is realism that was intended, but, precisely, a script agile and scathing, capable of showing a thorny issue as the pregnancy unwanted with sense of humor and without falling into the sentimentality.With regard to air pro-life, I have not seen the pamphlet anywhere. Only a scene refers to this issue and is the time in which Juno is decided by the option of adoption instead of the abortion, faced to a companion of the Institute by making a lonely campaign to the gates of the clinic. Let's see if we are going to be now so modern, with being in favour of abortion we not arrived and we will criticize the rest of options available, falling into the same trap of who opposes legalization.Finally the snobbery now load against the independent tapes. The gafapastismo is now criticizing the movies of huge budgets, which carry many special effects, which are few and cardboard decorated stone, in budget and independent air to take this look to a point that never ceases to enjoy any movie the public hosting mostly. These critics, who only fall of the Iranian film slow and forgotten are which end up tire me, with his elitist air and, despite the redundancy, TVGuide.com.For my part, I enjoyed the film like no other, with a script and so elaborate and attractive characters that I am not able to find him not a single but. I am so easy. |
2,557 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2871 | Iñaki Bilbao | La Jungla 4.0 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A real visual and auditory show that should be considered, in General, as a good or at least very effective genre movie. Ask more would be unfair. | Quite entertaining fourth part of the "Die hard" franchise, which as good dividends has given and continues to give to the producers of the same. Here, McLane agent remains in the same plan, saving the world from a sinister and murderous organization able to put upside down the world order, at least of the city of Washintgon and some more. Very well done from the formal point of view, with an energetic and explosive mounting, and with shocking scenes as the persecution of the helicopter to the two protagonists, the film, despite its slightly more than two hours, follows without any problem, perhaps because there is no downtime.Everything is action adrenalítica, no time to breathe, nor the characters of the film viewers. However, he attributed that in the end everything is too much. Too much movement, too many shots, too many persecutions, excessive, go. Your first time is all very well, and with the long scene of the helicopter we marvel and we are for good use of the money invested in the entry, not in vain, this scene, as well as many others, it shows that they have cost a pastón. So we can warn that it is a very expensive film, where the money has been used well. However, had could have eliminated some minutes, some little things here and there, so it would be lighter and it would cease to be the vertiginous billet in the end is.A billet, repeat, very enjoyable overall, but something deslavazado sometime and, of course, with several absolutely implausible scenes (many fantasmadas are House brand and therefore unavoidable), as when launched from the control box car.For its part, some "deliveries" are just that, births, i.e. very bad jokes, ears a thousand times and already have little grace. Anyway, that "The jungle 4.0" is a true visual spectacle and auditory (excellent editing and sound effects), very currado, that should be considered, in General, as a good or at least very effective genre movie. Ask more would be unfair. |
2,558 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/238 | Rafa Ferrer | Vecinos invasores | 4 | 5 | muchocine | DreamWorks, the House created by Spielberg is making step by step a site in the complicated world of digital animation | Not only Pixar dominates the cinema of animation, there have to Dreamworks, the House created by Spielberg is doing step by step somewhere in the complicated world of digital animation, and if already with "Shrek" achieved what more than one intended (that funny "touch" of tales classics.), now with "neighbouring invaders" get that tape "animals" originally aimed for children ends in an excellent comedy for all ages, the adult people who occupied the room when I saw the film could not stop laughing and is not for less, Hammy, voiced by Eduard "Neng" Soto (nothing to do with his normal voice), is perhaps the most sympathetic character throughout the film.The animation quite achieved (perhaps in the human characters weakens a bit.), the fur of animals, the skin of the turtle, everything is almost real, 10 to Dreamworks for 3 years (almost) working. Finally, removes you bias thinking that it is a tape for "kids" that her you are going to enjoy all. |
2,559 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1631 | Dragon negro | 300 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Is fill all expectations once seen the film? I already think so yes, 300 is everything that promised, action without limit or barracks, a fascinating visual and auditory experience, violence and blood. | 300 were men that King Leonidas called his guard personal, 300 were the Spartans who accompanied him on a suicide mission, 300 men handed over to their King and facing more than one million of Persians, 300 was the comic of Frank Miller and Lynn Varley 300 is now the last film by Zack Snyder based on the same comicdo, one of the most anticipated films of the year and one that higher expectations to lifted since they could see their trailers.¿Se fill all expectations once seen the film? Already think so yes. To begin with, and something that anyone who has seen the trailer or images already suspected, is the visual aspect of this hotel is spectacular. The grey skies and dull and dry yellow fields are mixed and contrasted with the semi-desnudos bodies and the red blood of the layers. But that's nothing compared to when starts the action and battles are happening one after another, violence erupts without truce, the Spartans levelled their shields, swords and spears without mercy, and started members and traversable bodies blood splatters the screen slow in some contests of cruelty as rarely seen on a big screen. Everything comes accompanied by one thunderous sound, another of the great successes of the film, sound and music always in line with the scenes, more writing in the battles, and calmer in other pieces.The film baby much of the comic in which it is based, with some scenes and practically modelled dialogues of the original, these are the best moments of the film, the most successful. The meeting between Leonidas and Xerxes worth noting it by this verbal confrontation and that majestic characterization of the Persian King that almost seems a giant and a really solemn voice. There is no doubt that those who have enjoyed the comic found many points in common with this. Anyway the film takes their concessions and creates new frames, as the son of the captain and the plot of the Queen in Sparta, both quite dispensable.Gerald Butler is superb as King of Sparta, his gaze is scary and her screams you makes you want to go to fight with him, not be that may be dubbing because the pass that I've gone has been in V.O. and is tremendous, I hope that not cagen with dubbing. Also this spectacular is Rodrigo Santoro as Xerxes, almost unrecognizable with both piercing and a height and presence almost divina.300 is everything that promised, action without limit or barracks, a fascinating visual and auditory experience, violence and blood, but apart from that feast which comes to claim the film, similar to the towards the comicIt is the sacrifice of a group of men by the system of life which believe, to live in freedom and not kneel to a divine King, it is the fight of democracy against dictatorship, a tribute to a group of courageous soldiers without which perhaps today Europe not serious that is. Since then I have no doubt that this film will be on lists of the best of the year when counting is done. |
2,560 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1533 | Rafa Ferrer | Zombies party | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Fresh and fun, humor that drinks of British comedies, the only downside that I find is that perhaps there are things of English humor (quite acid) we should pay enough attention to them. | Behind this title something simpleton and quite misguided hides a fairly casual English comedy, made as an homage and parody of the recent successes that have come to the cinema and dealing with Zombies, from the very bad "Resident Evil" until the exceptional "dawn of the dead", the tape, produced by "Working Title" is amazing and 100% recommended for lovers of movies from Zombies. Also with a fresh and fun, humor that drinks of British comedies, the only downside I can find is that things of English humor (quite acid) to be put quite some attention, since if not not he catches the grace there may be. Stresses in the soundtrack two Queen songs taking part in two of the film's funniest moments. And a finish that leaves you for a long time with laughter in the mouth. Sharing names of best current English comedians, quite unknown in Spain, that make all without exception a few completely casual roles. Another negative note is the title, as in original version is called "Shaund of the Dead" and here have entitled the poorly as "Zombies Party" which makes no sense with the film itself. Finally, a zombie film with another air and very but very funny. |
2,561 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1948 | Francisco Bellón | ¿Quién dice que es fácil? | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Who says that it is easy? It is another resounding example of funny comedy that could become, but who stays in a sad sentimental comedy funny at times. | There are many things that give life to salt and pepper that needed, and one of those elements is the irony that sometimes spends the destination. Although sometimes it seems more than irony, pure and true bad milk. When you need to pass one thing, convert the other, and sometimes, when you need to pass the other, passes one. All this small philosophical gibberish is beside the point of irony that Spanish films succeed in Argentina and here pass more punishable than glory (not, isn't a nod to Víctor García León), and to the Argentine films pass them exactly opposite, who succeed in Spain and their country pass with indifference.After the great success of No Sos Vos, Soy Yo, reaches the Spanish charts the new work of its Director, Juan Taratuto. Who said it was easy? It's an unconventional romantic comedy, whose protagonists are Aldo (Diego Peretti), an insecure and obsessive man, and Andrea (Carolina Peleritti), a graphical one reporter who has traveled around the world, pregnant without knowing who is the father. The first half of the film has the best qualities of a romantic comedy, is fun, enjoyable, and possesses a great pace; However, the second half has all the defects of the romantic comedies, leaves humor aside to focus on the sentimental level, get the usual conflicts, and finally becomes slow and heavy. Today, there are very few comedies from beginning to end intending unique and healthy to laugh to the Viewer, that most just hiding intentions moralistic or sentimentaloides. For its part, Diego Peretti (luckily has not known it Quevedo, because if not laugh of the "there is a man in a nose glued") does a good job interpretive, more content and less histrionic than in previous works. Carolina Peleritti also offers a good job, and surely finally ends with the former model stuck to actress sambenito.Anyway, who says that is easy? It is another resounding example of funny comedy that could become, but who stays in a sad sentimental comedy funny at times. |
2,562 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1893 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | 9 songs | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Nothing remarkable: star dust, dusty, many stars, long guitar riff and long rush of adrenaline rock. | There is nothing new under the Sun or in a cinema seat: 9 songs have already seen. Does news: uses the width and bombastic background of references in the history of the cinema and formulates a hypothetical media scandal abating as soon as one really weighs the degree of provocation of its proposal.Winterbottom is rupture far left to be routine, reformer of an already existing speech that had their beautiful peak in the late 1960s and early 1970s: flower power, hippies, guitar riffs and subidones of LSD to synchronize the body with the free spirit of the songs cosmos.9 is sex, drugs and rock and roll. Missing Ian Dury. Moreover, there is here a stubborn advocacy of the skin as almost unique vehicle for communication between a couple. The speech underground, indie or like call has points of collapse everywhere because (perhaps) this is not a movie, or at least one film in the way that I understand the films, but a hybrid curious, boring, electric moments and, in the end, disappointing documentary about stars on stage rock and hardcore eroticism (or the softcore).If I put the MTV and see a concert of Black Rebel Motorcycle Club or Franz Ferdinand (whose records have) it would not be worse time. This time, at least I saw in dvd format and didn't have to get out of the bad-tempered film. |
2,563 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2710 | Hombre Lobo | White Noise 2 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | A sequel to whose only virtue is the do that, by comparison, its predecessor seem a masterpiece. | Two years ago we had the opportunity to see White Noise (2005), a supernatural thriller with Michael Keaton at the head of the cast that sought to exploit the phenomenon of psicofonías as a basis for a horror story. The film was quite poor in cuanti results, dedicated bad than good to destroy a plot with an enormous potential. As well, two years after that failed attempt becomes White Noise 2: the light (2007), a sequel to whose only virtue is the do that, by comparison, its predecessor seem a masterpiece. I fixed that by the end of this year, this title will appear in several lists made out there with the worst thing that us has fallen through the screens.The title of "sequel" is only nominal, because in principle has nothing to do this film with the first part. Even though mention is made of the exorcism which consisted of argument based on its predecessor, White Noise 2 is a completely different story, this time taking as a starting point other paranormal phenomenon quite controversial and "documented", of near-death experiences. The difference is that, unlike the first part, in this film there is no claim of delve into the supposed reality of this quasi-mystical event, only serving as an excuse for the Assembly of a history that mixture (fairly chaotically) psychic perceptions, Satanic influences and even a Superhero Tale: the protagonist is a man whoAfter being rescued by doctors just before palmarla, begins to perceive a luminous aura that identifies people who will die. Motivated by this new faculty, and believing to have found his true vocation, it is launched to save the doomed poor is day to day, not knowing that alter the plan of death is not something which go unpunished.It is clear that this film makers have mixed a hodgepodge of topics and situations that already had been touched on tapes much better, from flatliners (1990) to final destination (2000), as well as this masterpiece of M. Night Shyamalan which is protected (2000). The problem is that, even more than its predecessor, White Noise 2 has no idea of what kind of movie it is, and shows it shamefully veering from a genus to another without any criterion and generating a terribly confusing and misleading research plot, in which the character almost by chance discovers a terrible curse that surrounds those gifted as him and which has its origins in ultraterrenales areas. Without the slightest decency, the story goes through increasingly ridiculous situations and (this really is unforgivable) is improvising the rules all the time. To make matters worse, the film uses, even from the opening credits (!) to typical cheap scares, those that make you jump from the Chair but after which immediately you parts of laughter. Laughter is also the end, simply incredible by the tacky. Or speak in addition to the vergonozoso resource of inserted "dark" images in a completely free and incoherent way, intended not to the characters, but the Viewer, that Yes, leaving it well obvious that until the most palurdo of the audience so caught. A mockery in any rule.It is impossible to catch this film anywhere, unthinkable to find therein any virtue than that of projecting a light positive on his mediocre first part. In fact, the only positive reviews which has to date received White Noise 2 seem to come unconditional fans of Nathan Fillion, charismatic actor who has earned a legion of fans thanks to his participation in the sadly defunct series Firefly. But even these can not overlook the fact that we have one of the lowest of the year, a direct-to-video that sneaks in the cinemas by mistake (at least, is this the only explanation I have for its premiere).I forgot to mention that the director of this nonsense is Patrick Lussier, sponsored Wes Craven and director of "curious" products as Dracula 2000 (2000). It seems that the bar was not very high after all. |
2,564 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1115 | Elena Suárez | María Antonieta | 2 | 5 | muchocine | What cut you your head! -I thought yesterday while leaving the cinema after seeing the last work of Sofia Coppola - and I was not referring precisely to the already decapitated Marie Antoinette but to the author of such nonsense. | What cut you your head! -I thought yesterday while leaving the cinema after seeing the last work of Sofia Coppola - and I was not referring precisely to the already decapitated Marie Antoinette but to the author of such nonsense.The film begins with an interesting historical accuracy (which shows us that in that sense, yes have done the homework), but the narrative development concentrates too much on some aspects which may be boring to the Viewer (half of the narrative is dedicated to explain the noted fact consummated that not their sexual intercourse until after several years of marriage). On the other hand, the Director has stated in more than one interview that the intention was to show us that the sovereign was not an idiot but a smart woman who retained their human side, but in the movie the only thing we see is a niñata that is exclusively dedicated to take cakes at all hours and drink champagne together with friends of the Court. (I obviaré the comment of the human facet of Marie Antoinette and her husband that I do not think that the Coppola knows what is starving).The main problem of the film is that he has considered the design and image to the detriment of the argument, that is why I had the feeling of watching a video clip instead of a feature film: the scenes of Marie Antoinette and her friends in a palatial retreat reminiscent of a famous advertising campaign in which asked us what smelled the clouds brought me.As for the soundtrack, the great controversy, I have to say that not it seemed neither strident nor in bad taste. Few songs pop that appear and frankly, they do not desentonaban in the environment, in fact, I would not surprised the couple of fashion, Almodovar and "Pe", appeared in the midst of so much move, that Yes, Parisian scene.As a final auction, in a world so cool grow is not synonymous with aging, in fact both Marie Antoinette and Louis look exactly the same when they marry (she fifteen and sixteen) that when fleeing from Versailles (thirty-five and thirty-six, respectively). |
2,565 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1091 | Francisco Bellón | María Antonieta | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Marie Antoinette is a blur in the hitherto flawless race of Sofia Coppola, blur that we all hope that he recovers, it is one of the most promising of his generation filmmakers. | There are many people who believe that if you have a good last name he can succeed in life, and somehow is true, since there are surnames which open doors with ease. However, it can also be a very heavy burden if the person in question has talent, and wants to demonstrate that it has more to offer the world than its name. This has happened to Sofia Coppola, daughter of major Francis Ford Coppola all of his works are examined with a magnifying glass, and not be few who try to search similarities to his father's films. After his remarkable debut with the Virgin suicides and its later Lost jewel in Translation, showed that his talent was innate and won the right to let people think about her as "the daughter of".For his third feature film, Sofia Coppola takes film once more the life of Marie Antoinette (Kirsten Dunst), the last Queen of France, executed on the guillotine during the revolution. It is not a current portrait that shows the character from another angle, from the inside of their palatial and festive world. Trying to humanize and justify a character demonising historically by its excesses and scandals is actually very risky, and unfortunately the film deteriorates markedly. Marie Antoinette is the story of a capricious, inconstant, insecure and unconscious young woman, whom the Director to justify showing the suffering of his early life at the Court of Versailles. Surprisingly, his trajector, Sofia Coppola to make a story so pink and somewhat caramel like this. Although it sounds opportunistic, one must admit that to portray a historical character as important as Marie Antoinette, must be widely show the reality in which they lived (and not only with a map of Kirsten Dunst in the balcony of Versailles showing his solitude, or other leaning against an enraged crowd) and its socio-historical context. A point in favor of the tape is being filmed in the same palaces of Versailles, although it must be admitted that Sofia Coppola does not possess the visual power master Visconti had similar questions. The pace of the film is quite slow, and becomes especially heavy in the sequences in which scarce dialogues. Kirsten Dunst, by their stop, fulfills the role of teen Queen who never left the age of Turkey.Marie Antoinette is a blur in the hitherto flawless race of Sofia Coppola, blur that we all hope that he recovers, it is one of the most promising of his generation filmmakers. |
2,566 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3253 | Pruden Rodríguez | El Orfanato | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Great debut by J.A. Bayona, returning to the top Spanish horror movies. Correct in all respects, entertaining, disturbing. | Average film, once in the House closed coup the umpteenth door (and all now the corresponding hop), a friend told me to sottovoce: "pa' me that the House falls on ramp". It is true. and perhaps if the architect had done his work well, or the Carpenter had been revised to fund these hinges, or if simply anyone bothered to close Windows from time to time, perhaps then we we avoid some another scare in this kind of movies. Now however, do can imagine someone a film of terror, with gloomy House included, without any other door? And what I say the noise of these noises that do not come from any particular site and can not awarded to anyone nor to anything in particular? Too late to be the gardener, too sharp to be the caldera, too serious to be air. The children can not miss. Children are always scary. I was thinking of having one, but I'm back to rule out that option.Jokes apart, in the orphanage work the old tricks (that there are, and pairs) and new (to there them). Newcomer Jota has shown a great talent for carrying out (because knew it who had been following his career) and skillfully directs a film very disturbing and distressing. The script is very correct. and though bebe from many sources, one has to assume that nothing new there is under the Sun since the time of Aristophanes. The plot hooks, moving between the thriller and the terror, and in the end surprises us as they already did the others or the sixth sense (among many others, clear).It stands out, for my taste, the interpretation of Belén Rueda. So much that it overshadows the correct interpretation of Fernando Cayo and the rest of the side. Wheel convinces in the desperate search for his son and the spectator suffers at their own pace. Add to all this a picture excellent, very appropriate to the tone of the film, and will be one of the most interesting horror films of recent years. Confirms that we master the genre. |
2,567 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1617 | Matías Cobo | La vida de los otros | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A new sample of the enviable health German cinema is showing through various works to uncover, with exemplary self-critical spirit, its recent history. | It is difficult to unravel how they operate the gears of empathy. Because, in many cases, it is usually derived from minor details or recondite coincidences. And you can take us so suddenly or penetrate with such depth that, suddenly, our perception of life turn 180 degrees. By similar trance will happen in the lives of others the captain Gerd Wiesler (a splendid Ulrich Mühe), one of the most efficient officers of the Stasi, the secret police of the Communist and former Democratic Republic Alemana.Este police group develops an intense work of espionage suspect especially subject of actions contrary to the pervasive Communist Party and its regimewood borers by a Pleiad of disbelieve and corrupt leaders. Far from having been contaminated by flawed environment, Wiesler continues with its Franciscan devotion to the Stasi. As she demonstrated in exemplary staging, is the interrogator and the 'detector' subversive elements more effective. Neither doubt nor piety, and his loyalty to the party and the Communist ideal is flawless.But his life, as grey as the GDR in the 1980s, will be unpredictably busy while it investigates a prestigious writer (Sebastian Koch) and his girlfriend actress (Martina Gedeck). With them you will be unable to apply the iron manual of the informer as yesteryear and its apparent inhumanity will begin to rid that feels concerned by the investigated outside lives.Thus, the film by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck gains in interest as it weaves a relationship between researcher and investigated based on subtle complicity. Captain lives, secret and passionately, the ups and downs of the life of its objectives. And at the same time, the viewer attends the decline of a regime mired in their paranoid control of all dissident activity. In a society like this, without freedom to dissent, artists must choose to create the service of the State or live in the frustrating ostracism.In a way, this directorial debut of promising Florian Henckel is situated in the Antipodes of nostalgic revisions, as seen in Good bye Lenin!, sobre the last years of communism in Germany prior to the fall of the wall. But, first and foremost, it is a new sample of the enviable health German cinema is showing through various works to uncover, with exemplary self-critical spirit, its recent history. No doubt, the Rosary of awards that is accumulating that the lives of others is more than justified. |
2,568 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1120 | Enrique Colmena | Luces al atardecer | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Filmed with the hieratic austerity Spartan typical of Kaurismäki, those look torva faces, those few dialogues, that pale microcosm of a Helsinki permanently in shadows, not he defrauded his followers, and leaves some pearls of desolate beauty. | Anyone who has seen a Finnish Aki Kaurismäki film knows what kind of movies does: a sad and desolate universe, a urban wasteland full of hieratic faces, one tragedy after another, entirely a valley of tears to the edge of the Arctic Circle, as if figuratively six months night lasted forever in that inhospitable (do as regards climate: in social welfare gives soups with honda to the rest of the world?) land. "Lights in the evening" not worthy at all of that feeling that conveys all the films of Kaurismäki, with "The girl of the factory of matches" (see criticism in CRITICALIA) as película-insignia his filmography and their intentions thematic and aesthetic; We are, therefore, face a depressing story, which should go "because" Prozac. The protagonist happen all conceivable misfortunes, and that not to give account of the cure to his solitude is so close: vigilant sworn (come on, "segurata", as it is colloquially in Spain) despised by his fellow is unexpectedly courted by a girl that he seeks a ruin on the orders of his boss, a capomafia without appearance no italic, but with the same unscrupulous (i.e.)(none?) their Sicilian colleagues. In the meantime, our unhappy poor will not have their eyes: love, so close, so silent? Filmed with the hieratic austerity Spartan typical of Kaurismäki, with those faces of baleful gaze, those few dialogues, that pale microcosm of a Helsinki permanently in shadows, not disappointed his followers, and leaves some pearls of bleak beauty: the exceptional scene in which the silent lover of the protagonist (who has not yet knows that love) learns that his beloved segurata comes with another: the lights of his small kiosk selling sausages will be shutting down, one after another, to darken the cubicle completely, as the own mood of selling hot dogs, to hear the sad news of the loss of his beloved. This is not a movie just to pass the time: need stomach (not by that has harsh scenes, but by its lack of seasoning, spice to her make more tasty) and much spirit movie buff. But it is also true, however, it is unusual film, which should be protected if it were in danger. Clear that, fortunately, Kaurismaki keeps making cinema regularly; It is good that has spend less on budget that Chiquito in anxiolytics? |
2,569 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4280 | Ivan Villamel | Supersalidos | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A recommended surprise in the form of comedy teen, with a few players in State of grace, a few fun so far as dialogues despite to be based on the themes of always, with multiple references to this style of the 1980s comedies. | One usually has some suspicion when it comes to go to see a film about teens with altered and eager for sex hormones, more taking into account that in the vast majority of cases usually give monsters of the greater possible ilk as a final result. It is also true that a server is usually disconnected part of your brain on many occasions and is able to enjoy even the primary instincts posed the jokes even sexist times about sex, women or any other lindeza concern to most of adolescents and often portray these films.The only hope that housed find me before a decent product was who was behind this production, Judd Apatow, in this case as a producer, which is owed modern with considerable interest comedies as "Virgin at 40" or the commented recently in this blog "Embarazoso mess" (of imminent release also in rooms). So pleasant surprise that I have brought, despite find us with certain common productions such passages, would be an error be carried away by the superficiality in this laudable attempt to provide a true humanism to the characters in the story, despite constant talks of thick stroke.Greg Mottola, a semidesconocido director who has previously worked for television in various comedies, knows to create comedy almost perfect teen for the times, that point of view always the vicissitudes faced a few adolescents treated from a fearful of adolescence and realistic vision (and again, probably influenced by this new brand in the American comedy that already have become Apatow productions). Coarse comedy Yes, but always starting from a few characters with which any viewer is identified in several occasions.History shows Seth (Jonah Hill), Evan (Michael Cera) and Fogell (Christopher Mintz-Plasse), three losers, but why not especially schematized in a cliché precisely, at least not brought to the extreme, which found the opportunity to his short life of adolescents having sex or couple before the University when invite them a party with the popular people of the Institutea change of lead them with which satisfy both teen drinking left.Throughout the film, we follow the adventures of these three friends to achieve its objective, in any way during a long night that reminds the lived by Corey Haim in "Pope Cadillac", the popular ochentera movie. All this from a few dialogues that probably will be accused of swearing, bad taste, etc, but we should not forget, that while always considered so in most cases, they do more than reflect largely talks of a foot of every teenager, despite him who gets upset, realistic. It must be said, in this case in particular are really fun and cause more sincere laughter in the audience. But it is not the only aspect of the film positive, because underneath all that rude comedy hide much more serious aspects that run the risk of pass unnoticed for the absent-minded spectator. Fear to grow as a mechanism to internally fight nostalgia for youth represented in the attitude of the two cops (taken to the extreme, that Yes, almost close to slapstick), or other fears as losing your loved ones to grow and start a new life, represented in the film with the relationship of friendship threatened by the distance between Seth and Evan (both excellent in their roles along with the impeccable role of Fogell) and their emotional reconciliation final.The work of Mottola as director the truth is intrascendete technically, confined to be extremely conventional, without any notion of originality in the sunset scene, entirely predictable, as following a brand without leaving its conventionality or its marked guidelines.In short, a recommended surprise in the form of comedy teen, with a few players in State of grace, a few fun so far as dialogues despite to be based on the themes of always, with multiple references to comedies of this style of the 1980s such as "Revenge of the nerds", "This exciting course" or the aforementioned "Dad Cadillac", with more background than it seems at first sight, and a true humanism and candor of the characters in many scenes that create a hilarious solvent product and turns on their own merits in the best comedy teen years with difference. |
2,570 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2637 | Bruji | Los fantasmas de Goya | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Do do no one better that Milos Forman knows that? the horrors of history repeated? all too often. | Something supernatural happens when Milos Forman is behind the camera. Suddenly, the viewer feels like the protagonist of the Purple Rose of Cairo and is that, when he directs the technical barriers that separate reality from fiction, the screen of the patio of armchairs, disappear. At that time, it is no longer strange to concur with the head before the revolutionary speech of Javier Bardem, give back a smile to Stellan Skarsgard instinctively, nor that this hiele on the lips to look in the eyes of Natalie Portman.En reality, is not necessary to be brought "question" to sign and say that in the difficult task of transmittingCzech filmmaker has no rival.Goya's ghosts is a story of history, which well might being chosen at random, where religious fanaticism and the tyranny of political rulers lead to military intervention by neighbouring (or not neighbouring) invaders, in the name of freedom (safe-conduct attractive and recurrent), committed all kinds of abuses and committed against the population. It happened in Spain, and there was the painter of the King to immortalize the facts; but, as the director said, the horrors of history are repeated, so it is possible that this argument does not convince in the States holding of America. in any case, we are faced with one of those gems that resist all analyses of Gemology. The technical virtues of this film are innumerable and unbeatable, the composition of the levels is spectacular, aesthetic beauty is, frankly, amazing. Without resorting to clichés of camera, has been able to take care of even the most insignificant detail in every scene.Shows clear inheritance of pictorial mannerism of Stanley Kubrick, and his obsession with the unrestrained MIME of environments, costumes, lighting and sets. Milos Forman camera movements are still austere, and the "shaken" to which we are accustomed, creepily. The photography is excellent, exceptional mounting.But, perhaps, the greatest attraction of this footage is in the direction of actors, in his memorable performances that make up unforgettable sequences. The eyes of Natalie, the smile of Goya, the reprehensible aspects of the personality of genius, the extraordinary portrait of characters, situations and behaviors.It is important to note that each and every one of these roles rub the perfection that even Martínez de Irujo is credible and his wife, a Rodeo madrileña. However, I still do not find adequate adjectives to describe the performance of Mademoiselle. Portman in his triple register; and it is that I am afraid all the compliments of the Castilian language are declared insufficient to do justice. On the other hand, I have no doubt that who will be Yes batteries from this moment will be "the photocopy", his eternal impersonator, Keira Knightley, without being aware of that the bar is already too high.For posterity, are valuable samples of master, worthy to be studied in film schools. The interrogation which undergoes Bilbatúa Inés; talks that keeps the painter with his muse, in which hard to decipher if the protagonist is the deaf or its partner is silent; the translation that is, effectively abstract concepts, such as Liberté, Égalité and Fraternité; popular revolts, absolute chaos.Above their immense successes, what most surprised of this tape is a director of another nationality has received so much clearly the essence of Spanish, the mocking spirit of a people that is still called a "tag" to which many historians consider that it could be a good monarch; and why not say it? capture this ancestral trend of "whores", who continue to sell their services to the best client. Clear that, in all cases, is a matter of appreciation this historic episode has been told in the way that is done, leaving patent that this country was the subject of a spoliation unprecedented.In his latest work, Man On The Moon, he spoke of someone who did laugh when he himself had no own smile. On this occasion, shows those who are striving to appear normal when stability is absent, in a world that falls apart in a stage in which the courtyards of public performance is situated directly on the place where the pasodobles are danced. Devastating, heartbreaking, poignant, and with those eyes... Goya's ghosts is another masterpiece of Milos Forman. |
2,571 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3814 | Francisco Bellón | El Destino de Nunik | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The destination of Nunik is a sober film that excites and moves by the narration makes an outrageousness almost unknown to most of us | The international career of Paz Vega could not qualify with another word other than that of extraordinary. Praised by American critics on its first steps in Hollywood, as well as by co-stars of the stature of Morgan Freeman, the Sevillian actress has achieved a more than interesting series of films, which has first trabajao on the orders of prestigious filmmakers such as the Taviani.La brothers thinking next to one at the top to see the destination of Nunik is unfair is the film industry. It will happen without penalty or glory by Spanish movies (and what little that is due to the presence of Paz Vega), but if it were an American production impact and impact would be huge. The new film of the Taviani brothers, are not Holy devotion that subscribes to these lines, narrates the genocide carried out by the Turkish army during the first world war against the Armenian minority. The main drawback of the film is that it takes to boot. The first minutes is quite slow, and therein the Taviani are entertained with the small details and small stories, remaining intensity and drama as a whole. As soon as the film progresses, the story is gaining a higher category and packaging, and to the Taviani not shakes them the pulse to show the horror, hatred and the resentment accumulated a crude form but without losing elegance. But the destination of Nunik makes no sense without the magnificent interpretation of Paz Vega, whose work in the final moments of the film puts the willies.The destination of Nunik is a sober film that excites and moves by the narration makes an outrageousness almost unknown to most of us. And it is a new opportunity to see a great Paz Vega film to film growing in leaps as intérpete. The pity is that Spanish Cinema loses, at least for a season, so good actress. |
2,572 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1088 | Jose Contreras | Banderas de nuestros padres | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Away from narrative "Flags of our fathers" is a pure and simple, reflection and, if it wants to be a colloquial term, with a brick. | The question raised her once a friend in this way: If all the Madrid players hired them the Barcelona what you should do? You would change team and you would do the Barcelona? The answer is that players are not the team, right? A photographer drove six types in your photo. Then, when the photo was made home, across the country wanted to entertain the heroes. Those who came in the picture were not those who put the flag, were those who changed the flag the next day it was discovered. Does that matter? Eastwood said that an admonition.It is the paradox of Kubrick in reverse. In "Paths of glory", a battalion refuses to move forward on the Hill of ants and rather than shoot everyone, is formed court-martial five drawn randomly. Is it fair that pay these five unhappy?Eastwood has made good Narrator with his last films fame. But someone has to say it has been a stop on the way. Away from narrative "Flags of our fathers" is a pure and simple, reflection and, if it wants to be a colloquial term, with a brick. In "Million dollar baby" more than enough reflection of Morgan Freeman who judged the protagonist with his voice-over; There is more thought in "Flags of our fathers" and less story yet.In fact, even I am convinced the reflection. It goes on to say that the celebrate is not the photo or the list of soldiers really flew the flag: the heroic is the true story of what happened. I think that the celebrate is nothing of what has this film, unless "heroic" has become, suddenly, a synonym of "media". |
2,573 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3290 | Ramón Besonias | El Orfanato | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The use of a product for easy output to a globalised market has vertebrate this project made in Spain since before his idealization. So it is easy to avail themselves of the look innocent and in need of a novice filmmaker, although amply prepared. | After viewing of the orphanage one can only congratulate those responsible for promoting the film, for the invaluable work they have done - nothing enviable to the largest American lash us each week at the box office - to present us with a quality product and been insured entertainment to the generic film and popcorn, and in particular publicincluding the avid cinéfago from the genres of horror or thriller with ghost.However the orphanage offers (if anything) an estimable technical invoice and - that yes - a Belén Rueda which confirms its expressive force and dramatic potential at each level where fit his beautiful face, while tearing by I do not know what inner duels. Glad to see her, and only by those close-ups where the camera captures your face deserves spoil the moment. Moreover, the orphanage does not give much more, and it showed great promise.First there is the issue of the relamido tribute to the genres, so the taste of Anglo-Saxon cinema and so succulent figures often give face to the collection. And it is that this tribute has nothing of updating or movie fan anecdote with interests that if not enrich the whole, serve at least as knowing look to teachers that nourish. They aren't a mecano orchestrated with the sole intention of gustar. What worked, why not repeat it mattifying filling details, scenarios, one or another character reevaluated. The rest makes a generous promotion, a nod to the feeling of guilt the viewer homeland for not going to see national film and finish ends with the icing on a nomination that the known universe can speak (and the nihil obstat from the Guillermo del Toro himself). The stew is nearing to be presented and tasted to the retail price of an entry.Second is the delicate balance required by mix - without falling on her is a tragicomic frankeinstein - a genus so enthroned in the movie buff popular imagination as the terror with an emotional tone disloque without distorting the busy roads of the genus bounding into the clichés of the effect helpings, vocal score, the bloody gore or recurring situations around so easily enumerable compositivas by all amateur (psychopaths)adolescents without fear but eager to progress, sinister building, overnight as pictorial background.Orphanage prefers take as referring exclusively film and narrative delicatessens of the genus closest to fantastic literature and nineteenth-century horror, including the recurring echo to Henry James and his another turn of the screw (as for the taste of all filmmaker trained in the old school), and also cinematographic works embodied by public and critics to ensure the effectiveness of the scene and in turn serve as nod to the seasoned Viewer and recidivism critic. The orphanage, moves thus closest to the supernatural drama that the ghostly thriller to use. Search more underline the emotions of his characters under the veil of fear that scare without more (although these recondition, that child incorporated in a sack.). See other cases: fragile, them, the boarding school.And the intention is worthy, but. Bayonne (who earlier directed video clips OBK or Camela) intended to his eldest son give it body and talent without distill the mixture in consistent barrels. One sensed, as already said at the beginning, in the background the use of a product for easy output to a globalised market, without concessions to a demanding authorship, have vertebrate this project made in Spain since before his idealization. So it is easy to avail themselves of the look innocent and in need of a novice filmmaker, although amply prepared.What one hopes is that experiments like this, imported from the USA mother, are lucrative for whom they are implemented, and passing move the Spanish audiovisual market towards a renegade audience. But, please, do too much to ask a more juicy and consistent script? The orphanage boots up fine, calm, unhurried, used information, creating environment, but over time it becomes the question of or may not be a substitute for Poltergeist, one calque of the others (via the sixth sense), the Devil's backbone, the nameless, abandoned. And the end leaves as you can of the imbroglio decanting the now well-trodden path of their referents, but not its own entity.Things of imitating older siblings. |
2,574 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2540 | Taliesin | Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Move a 800 page book to the screen is an almost impossible task and with the order of the Phoenix have not achieved. Although it sounds strange, this new installment of Potter have left the magic in the book. | Five films in six years. The same characters, the same routines and an almost copied structure. It is almost a paradox, but the truth is that the Harry Potter films increasingly have less magic. This fifth delivery we can rescue scenes, but as a whole does not seem a great movie, for readers of the boy wizard, or for those who only know him through the film. What maintains interest in the Harry Potter novels is not anecdotal in each volume (we all knew that Voldemort looking and we all hope the great final battle between Potter and his nemesis). What really hooked to the reader is the growth of the characters, the evolution through the years and the possibility that this gives you know them better. If it wasn't for this, am sure these billets of more than five hundred pages to would be in bookstores catching dust. The problem is that in a film of something more than two hours is almost obligation focus on the anecdotal, that at the end and all is what moves the saga, to the detriment of what really works in the books.Only evolution that we appreciate the characters is that they're all more creciditos and have something revolts hormones, but little else. While through the books the reader can know the motivations of the characters, it is impossible to know is what moves on the screen. And at this point in the series, things have been difficult so much that it is difficult to understand that it is what is happening without all these references who have stayed in the role. In the end, everything is a great outline of what the book has to offer and I suppose that it is not only the writers fault, it is that it perhaps an impossible task. The case is that on-screen order of the Phoenix does not work and the story becomes boring, disjointed and repetitive. Even the smallest can withstand a weary rhythm which simply give strokes here and there, offering only a few more or less spectacular scenes on the way to a desquiciante finish, that have been resolved in five minutes.Another problem is that the actors who hired six years ago because they were funny to the House have evolved differently. Now some are up to, and others are simply bad. However, the selection of new players if it is correct and both Imelda Stauton, in the role of Dolores Umbridge as Evanna Lynch, giving life the lovely Luna Lovegood, they are really well, to the point of leaving before the shortcomings of the rest.Ultimately, Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix is pretty mediocre and more which aims is to be entertaining at times. At this point I guess it is late to change some actors, and perhaps should have done for a couple of films. What we must recognize is that, with the wealth in important details that have a more than eight-hundred page novel, it is virtually impossible to move to screen all the magic of Harry Potter. And that, when the protagonist is a magician, is something unforgivable. |
2,575 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1273 | Jose Contreras | Pequeño pero matón | 1 | 5 | muchocine | What the Wayans Brothers added to Hitchcock is a Freudian element to the British and to someone else would put the willies. | A thief of jewels rather soulless and hard hides his last theft diamond in the bag of a couple while they learn. To get it back you have to get into the happy family. The thief measured less than one meter and is disguised as baby. The couple adopted throughout the weekend.A key scene from Hitchcock's "sabotage" happens in the Palace of a Lady of society which, in reality, is a nazi spy. Two levels are mixed in the scene. On the one hand the hero wants to save his girlfriend of Nazi spies. On the other hand the hero is a dance of society with all its Protocol that can not be altered. The nazi, to catch the bride asks for a dance. The hero may not refuse because it would break with good forms of the label. When you get to the girl joins another couple innocent and leaves the Palace. The nazi may not use force, because it would break the same tag, and so on.Something similar occurs in "The purloined letter" Poe. The Minister stole the Queen the letter in front of the King, but she can not say anything, because the King should not know the incriminating letter. do? i? ek called this game "the impotent look". There is always a third element in this type of action. "Sabotage" is the good society of the Palace, in "The purloined letter" is the King. There are people that must not find out what's happening. «The other say? i? ek, not must know everything ".I like to quote Hitchcock to talk about a bad film because basically I like to give some to another noogie from time to time. The intellectual low-budget film may look the same tricks to the Hitchcock. The bully disguised as a baby is willing to use force and weapons, but when it appears the "MOM" returns to the babbling: «she not must know everything». Everytime it has diamond in his hands he must return to the farce that is a baby and loses it why? Because she is ahead.There is a famous scene of "Chained" in which Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman are about to be discovered by the evil Sebastian. To hide that they have gone to the cellar to investigate the nazi uranium, the two pretend that they are loving and embrace. Sebastian they mislead into believing that they want. But the funny thing is that in reality the two want. do? i? ek says that movement is typical of the Hitchcock film "outside inside". The characters feign that they are something until they discover that they are that something. "Pretend that we are something occupy a place in the intersubjective network, and in the end this place becomes our true position.""Small but bully", makes the same movement in an intuitive way. The boyfriend of the couple wants to have a child but she wants to wait. When the boyfriend sees the baby to the door of his house is excited to father two days. The thief took the place of son, to get the diamond. Each one represents a role, but the film attempts to show what each other are needed at the end. They have created a symbolic network parent-child in that feel too comfortable. So they are clubbing together to celebrate.What the Wayans Brothers added to Hitchcock is a Freudian element to the British and to someone else would put the willies. The baby should sleep the first night with the couple so watch them avidly when they begin their sexual preliminary. In the morning she remembers two adventures, the boyfriend just one: the baby has fun. But in which of its two facets? It is the prison thief has taken advantage of the ambiguity which has crept into the bed of the bride? Has o made it symbolically? Has your baby been which has fun with MOM? The viewer has the possibility of making a second reading scandalous, a lecherous Oedipus completely satisfied. |
2,576 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/482 | Alberto Concepción | Hostel | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Without doubt, the end result (and especially initial) is a pure garbage. | Everyone knows that in cinema abound bad films, especially in recent years. There is nothing worse than going to the cinema, with (or without) good expectations and find you a pure garbage. Because that exactly that, is Hostel.Producida by Tarantino, directed and written (why did?) by Eli Roth (Cabin Fever), Hostel is presented as a film gore, bloody, cruel. But in reality, we are dealing with a film with a screenplay unfortunate, really unfortunate, and a genuine engaña-bobos. Certainly what I happened to me how a film of no more than an hour and a half can have such home as slow, expendable, lacking in interest and empty? Two American students travelling on the European continent, an icelander they meet and go in search of sex, fast and easy. It is Europe as a world apart, chaotic, exemplified in Amsterdam, where there is no more life, from the point of view of the film or of those students, cannabis and the hookers.Rocambolescas chance, they end up in Slovakia, and after more nonsense and empty scenes, we reach what at first was believed to be the true story: a hostel where abducted tourists to kill pleasure.But no, not created those fans of gore, which here are good scenes of the genre. Just some things, which you can see perfectly in other films, much more successful (Saw and Saw II, say some). The end is perhaps less unfortunate of the film, and that it is totally predictable and lacking of sense (for those that have seen: there will be more terrible than the children scene?) (Really hilarious.).The cast, with absence of stars (which is appreciated), does not go beyond young people making young people. The address will pace that the movie, i.e. completely linear, does scares? typical. Leave the cinema with the feeling of scam is what happens when you see this film. A real hodgepodge, and perimitiéndome repeat myself, really awful script, found, insurance, away from any positive expectation created on the film.Sadly, I don't know what else to say about this movie. Only that, without a doubt, the end result (and especially initial) is a pure garbage. |
2,577 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4191 | Jefe Dreyfus | Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Good movie, great director. If Mr Joe Wright continues with this evolution awaits a very promising career. Wish to get, will certainly be a very good sign. | Good morning, I am elputocriticón, today is Friday and plays a movie premiere that, moreover, is news for being in the list (that beautiful word) of the Oscar for best picture of the year. So today: Atonement: beyond passion (takes shit sticky subtitle, which makes you want to trallar only to see it and on top is a couplet, which we have released the manga in this country of ready) started!They are not going to believe. The movie is a love story! and on top she is upper class and lower class and works for her family! (my mother, my mother, never seen, by whole body goose bumps). Total that the two pipiolos one day discover that their bodies react in a jovial manner when they are together, but just when love begins to be in the air, the whims of fate (and a bitch girl) will play them a dirty trick and eventually separated.Holy God, that can I lead to the cinema to see a (not pornographic) film whose subtitle is "Beyond the passion"? Therefore without doubt the fact that part of the team already collaborate together in the previous film by the director (and opera prima): pride and prejudice, film that I began to see a Sunday morning, on the couch at home, without whores desire, but that I loved and managed to draw a smile on my face (a Sunday morning!!)(, remember!). So when I learned of the existence of this film not hesitate even a moment go to see her and visiting drag elprimerhombre with me.Atonement is a film that is very well, largely because its director Joe Wright makes more history that history itself (which is the adaptation of a Best seller superfamoso pela me, the plot is nothing out of this world), getting more of what you might expect, but that, nevertheless, not just getting the Viewer (I) to the same extent that if managed in his first film)(Yes, already is that this is what has been said throughout the world but is I think equal, they want to make him). And is that the main problem that I see is that after a brutal first part of film (with a great soundtrack tying the scenes to perfection and a treacherous flashbacks) the thing falls quite in the second part (is the war lords) where unfortunately, despite the hardness of what they are tellingnot just hook and the thing loses pace. And all this despite the fact that this second part the director marks a flat sequence of who-you-shit-pata-down-from-good that undoubtedly will delight young and old. Towards the end, the movie tries to recover the pulse of emotion, but the thing comes late and not very conseguida.¿Y to all this uncle Oscar who said? Because (surprise gentlemen) her has been nominated as best film but has not nominated the Director!!! But if it is the best fucking movie!!! Not I (God frees me) give any credibility to awards, but is that these things do not stop amaze me (and scare me at the same time). Overall, we have the nomination for best foreign film, but the Academy has not nominated the Director, actress (Keira Knightley, who seem to be only well in the movies of this man) or Act (James McAvoy). How do you eat this? You will know. The safe end that will end up winning the adapted screenplay (more than novel adaptation) and one as the picture (does not fail, if you hear any comments regarding a snowing out of the film saying: "that good photography", this is what in the end will take the Oscar).In short, Good movie, great director. If Mr Joe Wright continues with this evolution awaits a very promising career. Wish to get, will certainly be a very good sign. |
2,578 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2638 | Bruji | El velo pintado | 4 | 5 | muchocine | One of those stories that revitalize with the passage of the years. Its failure at the American box office will then only anecdotal data that typically surround the great works of the cinema. | "Memoirs of China" that brings us closer to a thrilling story dated in the 1920s. In it, Somerset Maugham uses his unconditional love not correspondidos fixing and inexorable punishment ensuing reprehensible behavior. A film of high technical and artistic quality. A tribute to the romanticism within an essential title.But what little seriousness!. They measure them the film at the box office and American producers blame it to the Assembly of the Chinese. Why not directly to blame the American public?. It is possible that while others only repair in a heartbreaking love story, they sit warned before the popular clamor that joins the unanimous cry of: your House, imperialist pigs!.Better still, why not blame Norton, sole architect of the political dimension acquired the frame?. In the film of recent times is dangerous to show "the barbarian invasions". Only must be set in the ghosts of Goya, in their problems to find distributor.Up the inks against the synopsis offered by own producer, the trailer that sells and the label of "Romantic film of time", condemning it to the tedious saga is not could load. Fortunately, has nothing to do with the soporific works of the sleepy James Ivory.Como meaningless reproach arriving at the wrong time,? the legendary Mankiewicz Cleopatra failed miserably without that the Chinese to participate in the co-production-, we there a thick painted veil and will analyse the aspects that make it, despite everything, in an essential title.Firstly, it has an interesting raw material, the novel by w. Somerset Maugham. This author has been brought to the film on 24 occasions, being, perhaps, human bondage his most significant work. The same John Cromwell became work teacher under the title of captive of desire at the time discovered Bette Davis as "the bad" of the seventh art. On paper, El Velo Pintado is an x-ray of feelings that dissects perfectly the real reasons that feed and preserve the love.Secondly, are available to overcome all the obstacles that come from the adaptation of a story that is obsolete, to turn it into an elaboradísimo script for flawless structure, which has, moreover, a remarkable and select narrative pace. In this sense, it works in the style of the best classical writers, those who were writing, revising, supervised and retell relentlessly. In this way, on a material from the screenwriter of Philadelphia, involved another excellent writer who, systematically refuses to figure as such in the opening credits. Its mission is the extend the scenic spaces and break with the emotional Hermeticism of the initial story for the film glory, away from sugary contemplations that lead to the most tiresome of the aburrimientos. The unquestionable merit is Edward Norton. The third fundamental pillar it find in the dialogues, as smart as attractive, perfectly constructed, once again, in the purest style of the classics. Only the authors of the 40-50 decades were able to keep the attention of the viewer in long scenes? sometimes, entire movies - which were being carried out without major events, only two characters in claustrophobic somewhere. Those responsible for this film are not recreated in such situations, but know exit carry the day when pose them.Following major classical productions, requires the presence of two big stars. While that Norton - actor performs a discrete interpretation, Naomi is sublime. She showed her best dramatic record in 21 grams, hypnotised in The Ring and convinced to wear the clothes of early 20th century? such as 34 - King Kong. Without a doubt, the best actress of the last generations to embody the romantic heroine who give life Greta Garbo and Eleanor Parker. Both are wrapped by a successful cast of side of jutting Liev Schreiber.El fifth attractive element is extracted from a correct address which brings the various technical aspects to the category of characters. Thanks to some levels of the filmmaker, the viewer will experience the need to travel to Mei-as-Fu, even with anger. For its part, Dryburgh photography incorporates, at all times, the threat of the polluted river. Without forgetting the surround soundtrack Alexandre Desplat, the evocative piano, or the inclusion of this beautiful song: "do Il and longtemps that je t? aime.", that frames the crowning scenes of the film. The point in which the nostalgic remember the end of that "I had a farm in Africa".Maybe that "China is not place for a woman", but it is certain that this is one of those stories that revitalize with the passage of the years. Its failure at the American box office will then only anecdotal data that typically surround the great works of the cinema. |
2,579 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2372 | Oscar Cantero | 28 semanas después | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A job worthy of commendation for the skills in the development of a script of height which denies categorically to those who argue that science fiction and terror are minor genres. | Science fiction returns to the Spanish screens in the hands of the Canarian Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, which goes back to a genre that already cultivated with intact, his only foray so far in the world of cinema, with the exception of a couple of short films. 28 weeks later is the second part of 28 days later, that for those who do not know or remember, recounted the disaster caused by the release of a virus that makes the British population assassins and forced to shut down the country. This then starts six months after the first, a time in which after deletion of the virus, the country began to be repopulated.As usual in this kind of films, under the mask of the action and the pseudoterror, lies a message that parallels and analogies, aims to alert viewers and the population in general of possible situations that could not change the direction of events. In recent times, the laboratories have replaced nuclear weapons as a symbol of the decay and the inevitable destruction of a devalued world and poised his steps firmly into the abyss.From the technical point of view, is noticeable the magnificent use of sound, music and silences of interchangeable tools how to generate tension. In addition, the script is quite enough better that that of its predecessor, so get well-crafted, transmitted sensations of angst and chaos he wants; all this through a well defined characters. The cast is acceptable, although perhaps somewhat weakens the overrated Robert Carlyle. In general, a good movie, where aware of the gender and the type of film that is going to witness. |
2,580 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3468 | Plissken | Los Cronocrímenes | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Triumphant debut of Nacho Vigalondo in its passage to the feature film, everywhere less on the other side of the Pyrenees. | Thanks to the magnanimous CINEMAD organizers, a handful of lucky kids have seen the very enjoyable release in the direction of lengths of the hyperactive Nacho Vigalondo. I say fortunate because, for who still do not know, 'Timecrimes' is a Spanish film that has already won a couple of festivals (Austin and Trieste), has secured distribution and remake in United States and has filled rooms in very few passes of festivals who has frequented. And fortunate, too, because 'Timecrimes' is anyone who dares to exhibit in their country of origin. Now, go and take the blame for the crisis of Spanish Cinema Internet, the big American studios or the Spanish public, which is very Platypus.Surrealismos aside, Nacho Vigalondo debuted with a small mechanism of timepiece that traps, especially for his screenplay hotel. So delicate is the balance of the story telling that, as he is warning its own director for some time, the minimum slippage when writing an impression about the film affects the small big surprise which is to assist their development. Therefore, for once I would not dwell on the narrative: 'Timecrimes' has the tremendous journey undertaken when Hector (a haunted Karra Elejalde, in State of grace) Decides to investigate a strange event in the forest that surrounds the cottage. There are more, of course, but is a better discover it with Héctor. Vigalondo part from a minimalist approach (a few actors, a handful of locations and little else), and surprises the viewer with a history that we have already seen, Yes, but that rarely is told us in a very coherent manner. The work of direction is quite careful, without being spectacular. In fact, the sobriety (others call it poverty, but it is just lack of money) the production plays even in favour of a dark and claustrophobic development. Little music used is included with great success, and the darkness of the flat Nocturnes and foreign (fruit of a surely lower than 'The orphanage' budget) helps to understand the oppressive climate surrounding Héctor from very soon. Could they have done better? With more money, no doubt; with the same, hardly.In the interpretations section we have a sober and effective Bárbara Goenaga; a Candela Fernández who does not bother, but also falls in love with; and the same Nacho Vigalondo playing a key character gesture of the film, courageous (and usual) it, but which sometimes takes some power to the final result. Fortunately, 'Timecrimes' entire revolves around Karra Elejalde, and it endures without problems the weight of history A defect? The truth is that you can ask little more to an opera prima Spanish and gender, but I dare to say that he hoped a final. Wow, that would prefer other end. It is horrible that to not have anything about a movie.Triumphant debut of Nacho Vigalondo in its passage to the feature film, everywhere less on the other side of the Pyrenees. I look forward, for once, the American remake. There will be more media, the same director, the same story, and maybe, get a taquillazo in their country of origin. 8. |
2,581 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1495 | Ricard Marcet | Glen or Glenda? | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The blindness of the director by a company repudiated by the establishment, his honesty perpetuated in a film incomprehensible, are able to deeply touch the Viewer. | The film "Ed Wood" (1994), Tim Burton would give the final push to the process of revaluation of the work of the filmmaker known popularly as the worst director in the history of the cinema. Reviled by the time in which he lived, Ed Wood, controversial filmmaker ever there, has become the greatest exponent of what today we know as culture trash (ambiguous nature concept). An approach to "do Glen or Glenda?", his opera prima, it will allow us to clarify, insofar as possible, the value of this unique director.A mysterious old man played by Bega Lugosi, actor who played Dracula in the celebrated version of Tod Browning (Dracula, 1931) and Ed Wood is responsible for rescuing from oblivion, introduces us to the film from a couch in the middle of a small and strangely decorated laboratory. Take to accomplish a steamy experiment, after Lugosi turned into a sort of demiurge, directly address the Viewer to make way for the narration of the facts: in the city, a regalia is has suicide. The police which is responsible for the case, surprised before the status of the deceased, will ask explanations to a psychiatrist. This, will illustrate you on transvestism and transsexualism with two stories which occupy the rest of the footage. The first, significantly more developed, will be the story of the tormented Glen (alter-ego of Wood and performed by the same), who does not dare to confess to Barbara, who is promised, his condition of regalia. The second will briefly tell the life of Alan, who will see fulfilled their dreams to undergo a sex change operation.Theatrical realism to portray the daily pictures of the life of Glen, as for example the scene in which looks at the TV wearing clothes of her sister, will be close to the institutional video through the overlap of the pseudoscientific discourse of the psychiatrist. This medical point of view that keeps us away from the protagonist with which, in principle, we must identify, entroncará with the oneiric treatment receives the omniscient character played by Lugosi. The spectator, accustomed to a narrative made in favour of its privileged location, attends stunned a confusing and unbridled grammar whose surrealism, as well as the torment of Glen, is on the rise: grotesque metaphors (see the stampede of bison) and other extravagant images will result in a long sleep in which escenificarán, reminding us of the infinitesimal production budget, the ghosts that torture the mind of the protagonist. Sex, fetishism, desire, violence, remorse. Finally will come through a situation which, because of its more than obvious symbolism, is laughable: Glenda, alter ego female of our character, can not save Barbara a fallen trunk that imprisons him, the virile Glen will really get it. After resolving the nightmare, dare to explain the problem to his beloved and, by love, will accept it.Someone could think of Ed Wood, for his willingness to vehicular intimate discourse through a peculiar narrative (as cross-dressing affected him of lifetime), as a fearless precursor of cinematic modernity. However, his unconscious denial of tradition that precedes, seems to make him in a single case, a rarity in the history of cinema. Their willingness to do conventional film hits of face to face with a rare personality that seems to have not integrated the established mode of representation. The result: a film that (re) invents the film unintentionally, that he seems delirious in the eyes of all those we have been educated under a certain narrative canon. The conviction with which uses its effects of fair barraca, the innocence of metaphors, the interpretation of itself, narrative obfuscating. This displaces the interest of the Viewer, making the figure of Ed Wood film the real protagonist of the film. His blindness by a company repudiated by the establishment, his honesty perpetuated in a film incomprehensible, are able to deeply touch the Viewer. This seems to have happened with Tim Burton who, far from falling into the current worship to the freak, heir of the old show of monsters, has slum wood becoming the hero misunderstood one of his best films. Us might seem contradictory that the celebrated director of "Edward Scissorhands" (Edward Scissorhands, 1990), accommodating in their own brand of manufacture as author, celebrates a filmmaker as Ed Wood. But if something can say after seeing Glen or Glenda? It is the conviction with which works in his work against not leave us indifferent. |
2,582 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3206 | José Antonio Bermúdez | Sin destino | 3 | 5 | muchocine | What shows Koltai in much of the film already had seen him. It emphasizes it through a photograph converted in painting. The really interesting thing, the final stretch. Insufficient to understand what mean us. | Opera prima as Director of cinematographer Lajos Koltai is another view of the horrors of the nazi Holocaust. FATELESS is based on the novel by Imre Kertesz, who in 2002 was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature. She tells attempts to Gyuri Köve, interpreted by the young Marcell Nagy, a teenager of 14 years, by conjure the horror which meant to be imprisoned in the German concentration camps.FATELESS joins the latest cinema dedicated to revisit the event that marked the twentieth century. There is a need to detail, detail, hell that underwent the Jewish community in SCHINDLER list or the pianist; exercising the historical memory in Germany with the fall and SOPHIE SCHOLL (LOS ULTIMOS DIAS); a particularly poetic vision in life is beauty; the role of the Catholic Church in the ninth day.Its predecessors Koltai film retains some of the features already shown previously: a description of horror in the concentration camps. Before and after this story, destination without to discover us a critical view on the matter, this time from the position of the Jewish population at that time. It's desvictimizar, and is an attitude of submission of the Jews against nazi barbarism, based on prejudice and religious values. A brave but brief critique in their development. Too late. Too much detail. Too dazzling photography. Too much rhythm marked by innumerable fades black.What shows Koltai in much of the film already had seen him. It emphasizes it through a photograph converted in painting. The really interesting thing, the final stretch. Insufficient to understand what mean without destination. |
2,583 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/375 | Jesus Lens | Alatriste | 3 | 5 | muchocine | I liked, but isn't that masterpiece than expected and I would have liked it | I liked, but. So I want to start this review, especially because that "but" represents the overall feel that I saw in the majority of the people out of the film, while it is stretched, after two and a half hours sitting in the cinema.I liked, Yes, but I made something long. And it is 241 minutes do not pass in vain. In fact, there are who had removed long half-hour to the footage of this "Alatriste", that Yes, it is technically impeccable.I liked, but Viggo Mortessen speaks somewhat rare. Normal. He is an American who speaks Spanish porteño accent. Much is that it has not been necessary to fold it, as it would have been logical, with a big star of world cinema.The actors are great. Both the main Mortessen and the side. If Noriega is fine, Eduard Fernández is better and, above all, Echanove, camera and Dechent are fable. To make them a tribute. However, Únax Ugalde me continues to fall fat and, above all, the female characters out ostensibly harmed in the Division of roles. They have the characters less grateful, the less gracefully and more uncomfortable. That Yes, the magnetism of Ariadna Gil remains always.I liked personally, this "Alatriste", but I miss a storyline that you coherence in a concatenation of powerful and well resolved images. That is to say, do now why go to war? What happens with the gold ingots? Why Iñigo ends in galleys? Okay that life, sometimes, takes you by unexpected, unimagined and unimaginable ways. Okay that life, at times, does not follow a predetermined script and that things pass, simply. But "Alatriste" is a movie, not life.There is an argument or a story that you hook and you inmovilice against the seat. There is a script that you excited, there is not a simple story that makes you pay attention to what happens on screen. There is a story of astonishing love, nor a unnerving rivalry, a dream, a challenge or an exciting challenge. And, therefore, "Alatriste" just something cold and soulless.I would like to say that I liked, but that I have missed something a more classical narrative, with his approach, knot and outcome. It is technically perfect. The high budget is well spent and looks like the jets of the gold. Suits and dresses, historical reenactment and battles are perfectly achieved. Pero.Cuando Alatriste and Perez Reverte words appeared, finally and at long last, on screen, I realized that I had moved much during the film, he had looked at the hour a couple of times on the phone and the truth, did not have excessive anxiety by ask the lockers about when possible part II premiered.Or that "Alatriste" I liked, but isn't that masterpiece than expected and I would have liked it to be. I do not regret having gone to see her, but I have no scheduled reserve in the video club of the corner when comes out on DVD. That okay. That it is not wrong. But it is not the vibrant and intense film that, even with the grief and darkness was supposed to him, I was expecting. |
2,584 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3197 | Ana Belén Pacheco | The Last Kiss | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Complicated is that as good as L'Ultimo Bacio raw can get both losing the essence, the grace and the balance of a brilliant story about fear of maturity. | Complicated is that with a subject takes precedence as good as L ' Ultimo Bacio can get both losing the essence, the grace and the balance of a brilliant story about fear of maturity.Tony Goldwyn simply uses the usual system used by United States to make the perfect remake of foreign films: copy and paste. But in The Last Kiss happens something very funny in this process, get that in exactly the same duration of footage have 40% of the story rather less gracefully. Analyzing coldly that footage which is subtracted to the history of friendship and principles of each pair will be directly gag comedians irrelevant based on the essence of drama who in reality were trying to tell. (Note, though that Filmax puts on its tab (which is a comedy is a lie)Michael, the protagonist who is trapped to find out that he is going to have a baby, the flight can come from the hand of a young woman who knows at the wedding of a friend. While he gets fully into their new relationship and problems of ocultár his girlfriend friends are tucked into the same necessities trying to deal with their own fears to grow with more or less dignity.Zach Braff is quite unsatisfactory and even his relationship with a University (eliminating the tension of what they means for your relationship and even shortening the original age difference) just know seems taken from a Sitcom. In fact the quality of the young American actors that seem to come from American Pie is very disappointing. The script has been fairly cut and they have even dared to change the magnificent outcome of the original tape that somehow was the magic of the original film. It was Paul Haggis, writer of "Million Dollar Baby" which has perpetrated this blasphemy of the tijeretazo.In summary, neither fu fa. |
2,585 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1051 | Ramón Balcells | Una verdad incómoda | 5 | 5 | muchocine | This wonderful documentary tells us about global warming in a way so entertaining and unpredictable that makes Gore become this ready guy that was at the beginning. | Al Gore is a guy ready. And for several reasons. An inconvenient truth, directed by Davis Guggenheim, has allowed him to enter the world of the documentary film of an extraordinary, unique and simple way. This wonderful documentary talks about global warming in a very entertaining and unpredictable manner that makes Gore - Bush rival candidate in the US election of several years ago – to become this ready guy that was at the beginning. This inconvenient truth we face is a real event that occurs constantly in our world and that, obviously, has to solve. One when he hears global warming and prompt you to a humane solution stays quiet in normal state. Another thing is that they propose you to know or understand that global warming by many human solution you may have, cause it us. Yes, we humans. This is how Al Gore we have glued to the seat, with this simple phrase (and subsequent solutions approach, of course): global warming produce us. Of course, that if one is interested in a cumin ecology, the environment and all this nor you will be interested an inconvenient truth. The Guggenheim film aims to inform everyone of this terrible fact, but also knows Guggenheim, that not all us interested, so here the public decides. Do not only the most interesting of this documentary is to realize that these drastic events we are constantly witnessing? like Katrina, excessive consumption of energy?-cause them us, but you also see in the way how moves this message: required, entretenidísima and interesting. The message that I send to the public would be as follows: do not miss an inconvenient truth, as necessary. |
2,586 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1030 | Tito Chinchan | Rocky Balboa | 4 | 5 | muchocine | If you uploaded have stairs to the Gallop with the hammering on the head of tanan, soundtrack tananan, will enjoy as marranos in a puddle. And if not, you will have a sports drama of those who makes the female sector odie the male sector. Stallone has certainly managed to return to excite me. | Look at that when I read that Stallone was going to make the sixth installment of the most famed and oscarizado title I started to tremble. After having enjoyed with the first, I saw with total amazement as he beat one of his creations, to do shit like that in which fights with Russian. Too patetisto for this actor. But well, as one is more innocent than a botijo, him I gave this opportunity of which expected with nostalgia that the course be straighten. And hey, that he straighten and long.The film is about a former heavyweight champion retired many years ago, who now runs an Italian restaurant. As all good champion, lives anchored in the past, recalling every moment and every person who listens to him, as it was his life when it was the largest. Although this does not hide if not quite lost life, with a dead of cancer woman and a son that not ve, and him living what was, what is not. And in these, an absurd idea emerges a glimmer of hope, a way to show himself that is still alive.Well, well, I have to admit I'm writing with the stiff penis as a mast of a sailing Brig, so it may be that it split the keyboard of a pollazo of a time to another (is that so much previous poetry could make you cambiaseis channel). The movie I loved, and I say that seriously. For starters, the pace is slow and weary, as the life of the protagonist, which turns off someone who was everything and life is consumed in the memory. Continuous memories of the past make that, the nostalgic, remember the original with the hairs on tip. And give a meaning to the film that without them is not well understand. Also has flaws and things that no one believes, but does and that nose care?In short, if you uploaded have stairs to the Gallop with the hammering on the head of tanan, soundtrack tananan, will enjoy as marranos in a puddle. And if not, you will have a sports drama of those who makes the female sector odie the male sector. Stallone has certainly managed to return to excite me. |
2,587 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3228 | J-rules | El Orfanato | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The orphanage is not anything that you have not seen already 50 times, and is not more than a rehash of many different movies. But as always, there are ways and ways to make the remake, and this is the outstanding! | Having jeto must be a degree, and Bayonne has done to perfection. But as explains that the best Spanish film of 2007, and one of the best of the last decade of the Spanish film, is a remix of as unforgettable as Poltergeist films or others, which is crowned with the end of Peter Pan i constantly lies in the excellent Belén Rueda.Bayona has done what only great managers or the ready can doi.e., take the best of other films, coordinate everything to perfection, and add some performances to get the hat.As the script only has to adapt to the situation, Bayonne can focus on the actions, which make that the basis is more solid than it already was good principle. And then it is when, after some very credible performances, appears the absolute protagonist of the film, Belén Rueda, which enrolls likewise that of the newsprint, which shows that the pressure is not a thing that goes with it. Although the weight of the film rests him fully, it is able to exit the screen and overshadow anyone who shares a flat with her. The rest of performances have remark, although Bethlehem leave shortly for the rest.The argument you know from memory, and there is no need say so, why at the end and all, and as I said earlier, lives of all the references of the genre, and therefore without knowing anything about it already know how it will pan out. Even with that, we have some saved surprises, and they are given with cuenta-gotas. The camera is always on your site and Bayonne is efficient and effective. The pace is appropriate and is very well accompanied by a voltage which can be cut with knife.I have little more to highlight of a film that you you know memory i that supplies the lack of originality, with some performances and a Belén Rueda of hangovers. Bayonne promises and we are sure that we will feel his name several times. Everything for end consolidated, undoubtedly the best film ESPANYOLA of 2007. |
2,588 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1374 | Florinda Chic | 13 tzameti | 4 | 5 | muchocine | As a perverse tale Babluani presents its own Alicia travelling to the other side of the mirror and taking tea with dozens of crazy Milliner. | When you have nothing to lose, that could have been the promo of this magnificent French film. 13 Tzameti speaks of descents to hell, searches of treasures, fear and varmints. As a tale perverse - but most are - Babluani presents its own Alicia travelling to the other side of the mirror and taking tea with dozens of crazy Milliner.If - as it was not my case - the spectator comes without having seen or the trailer he enjoyed best the first minutes of the film. If I get to know that it was so revealing, not I hang up, it would have instead hung to the architects of the same. My apologies for this.Which nobody expected, after the entrance to the sickly universe in which delves inadvertently the protagonist, big surprises of script or unexpected turns. Babluani in its complexity, has made a simple film and takes it calmly using numerous subjective levels. A Spanish director - which I will not mention to not give clues - tried this same subject and I must say, that it took party in my opinion. But it is evident that the intention of the French is not the same, the footage we anguish but absolutely minimal form.In this case, highlight the excellent photography is not a discrete form of score I've bored. The film is narrated in an exquisite black and white that left spectators but me personally I am excited to. So a 10 to 13 Tzameti, which - I'm-: tzameti is 13 in Georgian, homage of the filmmaker to his frivolous natalPD City: in the Renoir, Saturday, at 22 in the evening, watching this movie two armchairs in front of me? It was Pedrooooooooooooo. I, that I always wanted to be a girl Almodóvar as Bibí, as Miguel Bosé, go with Madonna in a limousine and have breakfast in Tiffanny´s with the I was very tempted to wish him luck for the Goya tell that I didn't talk to her, ask her brand of lacquer? What was that it set me. I remained insolitamente in silence though out, my companions looked at me, they say diossssssss is truth? |
2,589 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3154 | Nüx | Hairspray | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Straight music, no life, body, or brightness. Fails to emit that assumption good vibes that intended to convey, rather just aborreciendo to each and every one of his characters and wishing to, please, stop once to ridicule. | It is not to bring the opposite to the flood of positive reviews it has received "Hairspray", but to me this film has left me an aftertaste to impossible to hide disappointment.Bad songs and good intentions that fall on deaf ears is what gives us this film who, following the current trend of making films for the just cause, claimed conditions of equality between ethnic groups far from the world, both in the 1960s as today, is able to digest. We must not forget the controversial proclamation pro-obesidad that spreads, among others, the female character played by a weary enough Travolta, who is unable to articulate a single sentence in the entire film that does not contain any mention of food.In my opinion, "Hairspray" fails to issue this alleged good vibes that intended to convey, rather just aborreciendo to each and every one of his characters and wishing to, please, stop once to ridicule. Although still more scrupulous, the argument for ridiculous: typical girl that would never elect for the dance of graduation that dreams of being dancer despite the obstacles, without more.And, unfortunately, as with "Caótica Ana", nothing positive to highlight of this film. |
2,590 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/871 | Pablo López | Batman begins | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A film that is first and foremost people's fears, a dark, bleak, black, negrísima, film which confirms to Nolan as a great director and leaves a very good taste to the Viewer | Last night I had the opportunity to see this magnificent film by Christopher Nolan that I now turn to comment. How I already have precedents. I prefer those who have not seen the movie fail to read. The rest of humanity that has already seen her, you can continue reading.As Jack the Ripper would say: vayámos by parties. Comment everything in its proper place.One of the attractions of this film was its impressive cast, that even the most minor character had an actor, and I must say that this incredible cast. All stakeholders are very well characterized, and fit into their characters like gloves. The best of the film certainly Liam Neeson (Henri Ducard) and Michael Caine (Alfred Pennyworth), two actors that I feel weakness, and offered chilling and magnificent performances in this film, the first as a mentor of Bruce Wayne, and the second as the family's Butler. Gary Oldman (James Gordon) seems derived from the Batman cartoons. Year one and position on the screen without hesitation. Morgan Freeman (Lucius Fox) plays a little taken advantage of, but this not away emotion or quality to their interpretation. Katie Holmes is perhaps the only 'but' of the resparto. the girl is fine (both in its interpretation and the rest of things), but I does not credible, he is too young. Cillian Murphy (Dr. Jonathan Crane) gives a much more serious and stylish to Arkham aspect of that is you gave in Batman Forever. And the rest of the cast: Rutger Hauer (Richard Earle), Ken Watanabe (Ra's A Ghul. or not) and Tom Wilkinson (Carmine Falcone) are also very good in their roles. Me Christian Bale has never convinced me as Bruce Wayne/Batman, but I must say it makes a very credible and appropriate interpretation (although there are times it seems Patrick Bateman from American Psycho), but even so, nor felt me as good as the rest of the cast. Incidentally, goodness at the end there is nothing between the Holmes and Bale, because they do not stick or with cola.The dubbing. to say a film that changes all the recognizable voices of the actors by others? Because that really is fucking. To me has seemed very correct dubbing, but I would also like to see V.O. (always say the same thing, and in the end ná de ná). Only thing that me scraping is that when Bale is dressed in Batman, two: press you the suit, or catches cold throat, because get you a hoarse voice that there are moments that clears the absurd.Speaking of the music, the fact that two height composers Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard to take over her was a big incentive, but without neglecting its unquestionable quality as score, it must be said that it could be improved, and that much noticeable influences of the other in some cuts from the soundtrack both a composer. Despite this, a wonderful composition and fits perfectly with the rhythm and the composition of Christopher Nolan as director.With regard to the direction, really nothing. the film speaks for itself, a few scenes, a few planes, a hair-raising pace, but we must admit mistakes: scenes of action (the fair, neither more nor less) are somewhat confusing, having moments that really is not a damn what is happening on the screen.The script, other ingredients star of the film. I went with the idea that was not going to like me, because what he saw in the trailer, it seemed too zen film, no, a species from seven years in Tibet with Batman, but Mr Christopher Nolan and David S. Goyer (author of the three Blades and Dark City) have done a really good job, a dark filmwith some brilliant dialogues, which excited, and some situations that drink directly from the essence of Batman. And the final nod. It puts the willies.In short, a film that is first and foremost people's fears, a dark, bleak, black, negrísima, film which confirms to Nolan as a great director and leaves a very good taste to the Viewer. Without a doubt, one of the best films of the year. Probably the best film in the Batman series. and perhaps, in time, the best superhero movie has been done. |
2,591 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3877 | Ivan Villamel | 30 días de oscuridad | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A film very irregular and failed, but to which must recognize you that at least it isn't particularly tedious and takes place with some fluency, if we neglected its topical resolution. | After a successful career in the field of the video clip, David Slade made his debut in the long two years ago with this excellent example of psychological terror that was "Hard Candy", film recognized by various associations of critics at the time, and even winning three awards at our nearby Sitges Festival. A story in which playing the cat and mouse by two antagonistic characters, a mature photographer with dark intentions and a seemingly fragile and innocent teenager, resulting it last the great winner of the film with a prodigious by the young interpretation Ellen Page.En their next step within the industry, David Slade took one of the usual ways that driving the evolution of the new American fantasy film directors, adaptations of graphic novels, in this case that concerns us, a mini-series written by Steve Niles and illustrated by Ben Templesmith's name is "30 Days of night". A story which not is situated, as well as the film, on the skin of a number of characters who live in a small town in Barrow (Alaska), place which, as reads the film, it is the highest human settlement in the area. When it comes to the month in which the darkness seize the place, since it does not leave the Sun in that period of time, and temperatures will be frigid, most have to leave the place during that period, leaving only some people. But a series of macabre events, and the emergence of a strange character that heralds the arrival of the horror, kept in suspense to the Sheriff of the place and his assistant. Soon after discovered her arriving of horror, announced by so bizarre character, due to the invasion of the town by a group of vampires, blood thirsty and willing to not leave anyone alive. The task of Slade after the cameras is not so convincing in his directorial debut, nor much less, if at that the Mise en scene sought a formal minimalism that helped the creation of tension between the characters, the total absence of free elements which diverted the attention of the excellent performance of the actors, on "30 days of night" still more old roads of the genusstill recognizing him certain style when it comes to shoot some truly effective terror pieces set. His work is very conventional, we imagine that you owing to the already proven tendency to bend before a pattern pre-established in the genre over the past years, a form of shooting fantasy film that is doing to endanger any hint of prestige that can become so suggestive gender throughout the history of the seventh art.It is fair to recognize Slade, a certain skill, let us hope that he made in his next films, risking a little more in the Mise en scène and above all better choosing scripts that decides to bring to the screen. Some scenes of the film justify this assertion, as the attack by one of the characters on the horde of vampires that teem by city impúnemente by a snow plow, shot in a direct and effective style. Or without going any further, the great plain air during the massacre in the streets of the town by the vampires, seen from the distance air brings a macabre but beautiful contrast between the Red of blood and the pure white snow that surrounds the place. In these scenes, and some more is better not to mention for not gutting part of the argument, Slade shows that with something more commitment can become strong within this type of film worth. Even in some splendid attack from vampires, it unfolds with ample ease.The great issue to deal with in the film, the fact of the isolation, and as endure a month hiding in the village, not is Treaty as it should, proving too abrupt and quite illogical on its resolution, a pity, because as it is usual in these productions, the beginning of the film, and certain passages, was to presage a becoming much more suggestive story and with more possibilities that finally we are on screen. On the other hand, is dealt with the history of confrontation and isolation of the way conventional and repetitive, with a constant succession of topics of the last American film genre, i.e., characters who make decisions absurd as separate for illogical reasons among others, appearance of vampires at the moment less appropriate for the characters, but more predictable for the Vieweralways staying in the retina a sense of deja vu constant. A real shame because the story was for much more. The work of stakeholders is even more poor, not highlighting any cast member in that paragraph, the performance of them all quite predictable, topical and flat, in the best of cases, with some alarming cases (excluding certain main actor which I would not dare not to speak of surname Harnett), as the horrific description of the leader of the vampires, although probably motivated in advance by a description in the script absolutely ridiculous. This character is due to the honor of the worst dialogues of the film, and that they are scarce more not being able, with a succession of absurd phrases, nonsense and what is worse, with pretentiousness sought in their stupid actions. A server is still asking that demónios meant the inconsistencies released by her bloody mouth.Logically, as I said above, if the proposal stands out slightly, in a fun, above the majority of proposals of the style, is because of the suggestive location, more that could have been, that finally resulting as final product. If that add some salvageable scene in which, as commented, Slade shows small know-how in these situations (also notable decapitamiento in the swing, especially that flat overall final scene), because we are faced with a product, that despite their tremendous limitations (not to mention cheeky influences from the film, as a misunderstood aquellla "Ghosts of Mars")(, here changing the aggregate and reddish Martian soil by the nevada Alaska, but being a clear reference in the final conception of the film, or who knows if in the graphic novel even), offers a divertimento for hardcore fans of the genre. A film very irregular and failed, but to which must recognize you that at least it isn't particularly tedious and takes place with some fluency, if we neglected its topical resolution. Again, an opportunity lost. |
2,592 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1234 | Yojimbo | Zombies party | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It is one more than decent and entertaining product and that surprises with its successful tension and abundant blood and black humor. | Dawn of the dead is one more than decent and entertaining product and surprised many by his successful tension and abundant blood and black humor. And of course, if come the parodies of films many believe that they have to be in plan Scary movie (Incidentally, have no paint never stop? as long as movies that parody).However the English manage to always get an ACE of the manga. They pick up a success as the zombies, adapted it and added much more elaborate but black humor. English humor well written and scripted. And the result is Shaun of the dead, title with much more game than the Zombies "hispanicized" party.Shaun is a slob with a boring and monotonous life. He lives with a childhood friend who only plays to the console, has a girlfriend claiming more commitment, a lovely mother and a hateful stepfather. But some day, people start to do strange things. It seems that they are all sick, become them white eyes and walk clumsily. Until that Shaun and his friend realize that are surrounded by zombies spend a half-hour with some another smile and ingenious Flash very normalita. Do from "the girl in the garden", the apathetic protagonist turns into someone determined, a hero who wants to rescue his mother save his girlfriend and bring them all to a safe place up? up not sure what.Without neglecting the movies from zombies gore aspect (there are some other sequence fairly explicit and asquerosilla), this film is great for black humor that follows. If Starship Troopers was another work of a great sarcasm (confused with a fascistoid tone) in which we could see youngsters prototypical and handsome stuck to bloody and disgusting vermin cannon fodder, this film fun to see so close and vague characters stuck to heroes of middling. The script is a great comedy that exploits to the maximum the clichés of zombies; that if, leads them to its more sarcastic end without losing respect for the genre is.In fact there are some another (too dramatic but insurmountable) dramatic moment that makes fall much rhythm. But this day of revelation does finish watching with a smile and a final sketch which leaves you with the idea of some parodies can be turned into good comedies. |
2,593 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2700 | Ramón Balcells | El ultimátum de Bourne | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The impeccable direction of Paul Greengrass is one of the aspects most highlight of this overwhelming and intense film. And do not forget that the final scene already belongs to the list of the best end of year. Unforgettable, unique. | The problem that there are today in the triologías of films is one of the three always ends up being bad, or even very bad. And you may wonder: why everyone admires to the Jason Bourne? Very simple: any of the three films is bad, what is more, they are all great. The first was good, but the second exceeded. And to top it off, the third and final delivery exceeds the first and the second. I that call you to be ready. La palma, undoubtedly her is Paul Greengrass, director of the myth of Bourne and the Bourne Ultimatum, the last two. It is not that Doug Liman did a bad job with the Bourne identity. It was an entretenidísima film and I think that without it nothing would have ended as it has done. Thanks to the opening of the history we enter the world of the amnesiac spy in a vicious manner, because the pace and exciting action sequences deserved applause several. That's why ending in the last film all in an impeccable way, all cables come together and finally, Jason Bourne remembers everything. Although this is not the final end?Not only is the Bourne Ultimatum, an action movie absolutely trepdiante. The political content also introduces to the history, corruption and the dirt of the secret agencies. I confess that I hardly moved throughout the film. And is that we can already be considered to Greegrass as a synonym for hectic: camera in hand so realistic persecutions, the constant plot turns, traps and intrigue (introduced masterfully). Not only that, but that Jason Bourne is one spy any. That no one will compare with 007 or other equally or more surreal. Perhaps not remember his identity, but we, the public, does remember it him as one of the best spies in recent times, portrayed in a manner very realistic, staff and, above all human. As Damon said: can you imagine James Bond asking for forgiveness to the daughter of one of their victims? And I do not come with the excuse that is now fashionable humanize the heroes. Not only because Jason Bourne is not a hero, but also because humanize a character it is a good thing and that increases the credibility of the work. Returning to the film, say the amnesiac spy stars in several of the most impressive action sequences that we have seen over the past ten years. Both of the first journalist in the Airport (one can not lift their eyes from the screen) as the Tangier (the persecution on a motorcycle, across the rooftops, the fight in the lababo?), and for not forgetting us of the last persecution automobilística in New York. And not only the film features scenes of action and really witty dialogues, but that much footage also belongs to the intrigues within the Department seeking to Bourne and company. Say that some particular scenes remind me to the control centre of the magistral also United 93. as well, the real master of the Bourne Ultimatum is, as I said before, its director Paul Greengrass. His style, his way of narrating, communicate, catch us, get nerves, make us skip any than another smile, another tear some. His impeccable and gross at the same time address makes us believe that where we are more than watching a spy film live live and direct. If the myth of Bourne the strong point of the movie was the novelty of the hectic, here the thing is already far more advanced, and not only admires the total presence of the Greengrass style during the footage, but that, as we already know, can witness that this is not a current spy film. We are not to the good Shepherd, a complex plot and slow play, but first and foremost the opposite. And both movies are magnificent. Yes, the plot of this ultimatum is nothing out of this world, but the way that is told is what really matters, then but had come out too easy film. That Yes, is not foreseeable. I followed from beginning to end all the plots, sub-plots and traps entangling by in the Middle, but that yes I knew is not what was going to happen in the next minute. And in this, I call cinema in its purest form. The end is a clear example of this intrigue. The truth is one predicted more or less what will happen from the beginning (by "guilt" of the flash-backs), but the Viewer cannot know what the changing of sides between officials and heads and the sudden final destination of our beloved protagonist.As the only weak point find that any plot or character could have used a little more, but it is true that in a film so everything can not get to be absolutely perfect, because what happens is, somehow, imaginary. And perhaps also highlight that some of the falls, trompazos or the enigmatic protagonist breaks had cost him, in real life, a certain death. And I say that because the scenes that surround these "acrobatics" are shot with a tone very, very realistic. But we must also assimilate this is a spy film and that he is Jason Bourne. What I also fails, and it is not the fault of anyone involved in the film, is the large amount of unnecessary advertising (especially the telivisivos spots) put before release the film. I, unfortunately, knew (not at all) what was going to happen, approximately, in one of the final scenes of "surprise" (because there is more than one). And is that in the Bourne Ultimatum everything just having sense, - almost - everything ends up resolved and many of the characters evolve more in part II. Needless to say that the dialogues that keeps Bourne, especially with Pamela Landy and Nicky, are not only revealing, also inteligentísimos. And that is partly thanks to the wonderful screenplay by Tony Gilroy and company, able to keep you intrigued and tension for almost two hours.And finally, speaking of the extensive and excellent cast. Start, no doubt, by Matt Damon, the absolute protagonist of the film, and that increasingly is becoming best actor. Here suffers, but not put face of agonies. First and foremost, Bourne is a spy hard and strong, but nobody takes his terrible amnesia and its continuous clashes with frightful characters, that you want to or not, just running out (to a spy portrayed realistically, of course). Its interpretation is even better than in the two previous deliveries. In the first we discovered, it was just right in the second and the third we realize saba to do more things that stick smacks, also known as any person. A key scene in the film is when Bourne enters House of the brother of his now dead girlfriend (great Daniel Brühl), where (as it also did in the end of the second) can be witnessed that Jason Bourne has human feelings, which can apologize to someone who has hurt. Highlight above all side David Strathairn and Joan Allen, two veteran actors show that they are the very best of contemporary American cinema. Their looks, their dialogues, their nervous attacks, their clashes. He plays Noah Vosen, a peaceful outside but very manipulative inside character. And she, which we saw in the myth of Bourne, a woman who goes after all and wants, above all, discover the truth either. Also say that Julia Stiles is not so sosa in the second and showing here a more courageous, more humane facet. A good scene where you can witness this change is when she appears for the first time, in a flat in Madrid, scared before the emergence of Bourne, and then, when speaking with him the cafeteria. And not forgetting two veterans not appearing here too: Albert Finney and Scott Glenn (this especially). Performances are great, but that was no doubt. The only actor that is truly untapped is Edgar Ramirez, the character of which could have been a lot more juice. Thus, the distribution of this film is great, with a protagonist that is better than ever and a side of authentic luxury. Greengrass can not complain.The Bourne Ultimatum is a masterful spy film, with a frenetic tone unforgettable and one of the best action sequences for the last years (always accompanied by the sensational score by John Powell). And it is that, first and foremost, the impeccable direction of Paul Greengrass is one of the aspects most highlight of this overwhelming and intense film. And do not forget that the final scene already belongs to the list of the best end of year. Unforgettable, unique. Let us give thanks to Mr. Greengrass for making us suffer during this hour and 51 minutes full of pure film. |
2,594 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1060 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | La alianza del mal | 1 | 5 | muchocine | This Alliance of evil is a Harry Potter last lap: a hodgepodge of topics caught with the fingertips and mixed in a blender of last generation to deliver to the teen audience. | This Alliance of evil is a Harry Potter last lap: a hodgepodge of topics caught with the fingertips and mixed in a blender of last generation to deliver teen public a film of powerful attractive visual, but hollow inside, hampered by an argument already seen on many occasions and sentenced to the pass by digital chains or the shelf more golosa film club neighborhood.Say that the case entertains i.e. already plenty, and there who take the time in the armchair of the film and leave proud of its low level of demand because, written brutally, what we have is a carambola carefully planned, properly shot and generous budget of pieces of a puzzle that never comes to assemble at all. They are four kids already talluditos, although mess us the idea that have less than 18 years, who have some powers that reduce them as they use them, who are also addictive and used to lift the skirt a blonde chocolate that is does not have any panties. It is as if Lucius Malfoy, the blonde very bad of the Harry Potter series, had won an award of bad milk extra and got in another book, alien to the children's innocent mind swings, fell into the account that it is God, but not religion or metaphysics, to the donkey, with a plus of spells, spiders, witches and bostonianas mansions of you not menees.They are not superheroes, but paint as if they were. Girls coming out are not meat porn soft, but there are scenes more moved to the encendimiento and lubrication of the pubescent mass that look. (Tomandandy, the architect of the crappy) music is loud, accidental and sparsely dramatic. My friend j., always so attentive to detail, led me to the idea of that, sometimes, the film reminded him, by parties, the coyote bar and, in others, lost boys. The mescolanza explodes into many frames, screeching.Directed by Renny Harlin (theirs are Deep blue or, Cliffhanger lethal memory, all decent titles) solves nothing: it embadurna all ex officio, trafficking in lifting a mediocre script pulling bad or bad approaching deplorable and so insubstantial mimbres may not build a cathedral of taste. |
2,595 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1156 | José A. Peig | El truco final (The Prestige) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Want to recognize or not, in the human aspect, in the real heart of the story, the film is too crude and mechanical. When it comes to the end, simply, one hears the predictable screeching of the machinery and is discovered is not such a good film as it seemed, while being a great narrative with many virtues. | Confirming to Christopher Nolan as one of the most interesting and talented current cinema filmmakers, The Prestige addresses the world of spectacle and issues such as fame, competitiveness between brothers of vocation and the precio-sacrificio achieving certain goals of originality and their consequent astonishment reflected in the faces of the audience. The magician and his magic understood as art; show unusual facts but explain the secret in order to keep the sense of mystery and wonder. According to the final slogan reads, it is preferable to ignore the secret.The greatest merit of the film lies in its classic scent, a sense of suspense in the line of Edgar Allan Poe, has a tenebrist touch that, at times, is quite disturbing. Such darkness, loaded with a certain romanticism, are a clear effect aesthetics used by Nolan in the Mise en scène, photography, the right soundtrack and a visual style midway between the sober and the Baroque. Creating, therefore a great atmosphere of romantic aromas, tells a dark history, and is approaching the various items with a runaway obsessive pulse. It is inevitable to remember "The Duelists" of Ridley Scoot, both productions share themes and forms, and one could say that "The Prestige" is a transposition of the same story at a time and different social framework. The obsessive obstinacy is the main theme of the work, an obsession which covers the entire area of the kind of world freak that wizards are weaving the secrets and the rules of the game. The truth is that Nolan, through its visual language and their striking sense of mounting and the rhythm, takes a poetic turn: we can define the film as a sinister, playful and poignant poem about magic and its exceptional effects on both the viewer and the wizards own minds. Accordingly, the film is beautifully poetic. But above all, "The Prestige" is a brilliant entertainment, which, broadly speaking, able to maintain the viewer glued to the seat waiting for resolution, although it has enough surplus parts and interest lapses at times. On the other hand, it also has a glaring problem; history, in itself, is not original, and not surprised. The end is rather disappointing by predictable and devoid of imagination both in how to solve it in the plot element that explains the entire network of puzzles which have been exposing over 140 minutes.You don't have too much sense configure narration in order to surprise the viewer with a final outbreak (the true final trick) of sorpresas.siendo that the surprise - for a minimally attentive Viewer - is not such, seen the Duster from the first hour of footage. The film therefore, failed in its ultimate purpose. There is no trick because there is no originality. This is a motto which is part of the explicit text of the film but that, without however, the own Nolan - perhaps because it is inspired by a rather mediocre book, perhaps because its excesses in the use of temporary jumps end up hurting the history - is not capable of carrying out the effect of wonder. His traps are you noticed too to menudoResumiendo, which makes it interesting to this movie is the way of structuring the narration (which gives rise to a fun game of clues and suggestions), the absorbent mise en scène and the strength of its classicism, but history deflated in its final part, precisely when it should enlarge and put that final heading of great films. On the one hand, it is a narrative joy. On the other hand, leaves us with a taste halfway. The treatment of the characters, while it boasts magnificent male interpretations, is too abrupt. And you want to recognize or not, in the human aspect, in the real heart of the story, the film is too crude and mechanical. When it comes to the end, simply, one hears the predictable screeching of the machinery and is discovered is not such a good film as it seemed, while being a great narrative with many virtues. |
2,596 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2453 | Ana | Ratatouille | 4 | 5 | muchocine | This film you can forgive is him his faults that it has many delicious things and, at least, is for children, which is no longer always the case in animated films. And it's definitely of good taste. | Ratatouille is a lively sensory game. Pixar plays with the food mixing very realistic effects that come to see organic. The food is tasty enough to hunger in the world of the film is completely cartoonish Jeckle rats and some ghost back illustration.What is better played this film are its moments silences, of well used comedy. But I am still afraid that it is the pelí of Pixar's more sermons and articulated morals. Not compared to the cunning that finding Nemo uses to tell the story and present his characters. Alfredo Lingüini is a very clumsy young aspiring in the kitchen garbage collector until intersects with Remy gifted rat of good taste. The gifts of good smell of Remy makes a successful chef of the overnight and, still common in the film, let the character main fairly level. The only character that has a deep moment of change is the culinary critic Anton Ego. Far my favorite character in his dark stylized with huge dark circles and superlargos fingers. Next to reveal us about critics no more than that which has always been suspected: that the enjoyment by pointing out how bad does not mean taste for good.Likewise this film you can forgive is him his faults because it makes many delicious things at least. It is for children, which is no longer always the case in animated films. And it's definitely of good taste. |
2,597 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3741 | Andrés Pons | Soy leyenda | 2 | 5 | muchocine | What happens with the artistic part? Because at any time you try to do justice to the large text that adapts, important thing here is entertain the audience, something very different in earlier versions far more faithful to the novel. | As you build a secure success? Good first one of the most outstanding science fiction novels of all time, written by the great RICHARD MATHESON I mix masterfully adapts the horror with the apocalyptic genre. The virtues of the work is echoed in the last man on Earth with VINCENT PRICE and hereinafter referred to as the best-known version with CHARLTON HESTON, THE OMEGA MAN.Taking the good mimbres in a well-known story next thing is to find a competent director to dispatch a BLOCKBUSTER action, then appears the figure of FRANCIS LAWRENCE who proved their prowess in CONSTANTINE.Taking the Director, a good distribution, which along with a MARKETING work to support a major star of the action or sci-fi film. It must be someone young, attractive with stunning physicist to look at the scenes of action with the delight of the fans, no doubt WILL SMITH is appropriate with great experience in the genre after I robot or INDEPENDENCE DAY among others.Now a budget of several thousand dollars so the machine begins to work hoping to raise a monumental taquillaza that allows large gains to all parties involved. What happens with the artistic part? Because at any time you try to do justice to the large text that adapts, important thing here is entertain the audience, something very different in earlier versions far more faithful to the novel.It is not that force in the first part of the film which shows a desert city lack you. Even an emboldened SMITH shows some dramatic skills in a character that oscillates between the line of sanity and madness.The first appearance of those infected is really terrifying. But little by little it starts to fail the concert, the surprise factor influences such as commented in the first attack of the humanos-vampiros while the other appearances are no longer novel discovering a few mediocre digital effects that make not as fearsome as they should be.The FLASBACKS in time is not convincing, a religious end does not know very well it comes. Well actually I think that if, is a nod to the audience so that everyone cheered the courage of the hero.Another point in favour is the prominence of the German Shepherd that almost overshadows the star of the function.Ultimately a film entertaining with good technical aspects except for some digital effect with a WILL SMITH that at times manages to be credible but in others is not removed the tagline of comedian being his little proper interpretation for the drama that should make his character. |
2,598 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1956 | Daniel Galindo | River Queen | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The director of the curious beyond the dreams of experiences, without much success, in this exotic drama linking warlike peoples who seek to impose on others with interior of any searches. | If Australia is far indeed that its history find us something more known for the film than its neighbour New Zealand, although not much more. Vincent Ward, who is originally from the country become Tolkien's Middle Earth, by Peter Jackson tries to put his two cents to the cause making a historical, not very contextualized approach the truth, to the colonial past of these islands.Surely the actress Samantha Morton conquered them in code 46, of futuristic Court, and the tremendous in America, which gave life to an Irish emigrated with his family to United States. Here back century and a half to arrive, also as a foreign, to a strange land will wake up suddenly because of colonialism. Do do do surrounded by other prestigious performers such as Cliff Curtis? to which we see in Sunshine-Stephen Rea? that is lavished here shortly - and Kiefer Sutherland? few know die like him-, succumbs to the claims made by a director who is descompensa the play.This journey upriver is curious and we start from an idea: is irregular in terms of its story, equidistant between the tedium and the frenetic pace, i.e. wrong level. Sometimes catch us the action, draws us what is narrated, and almost of instantly, we evadimos because of an abuse of the voiceover and locations of unsurpassed beauty. They will think I am exaggerating, but sometimes I would mind to the Piano and he believed he saw Holly Hunter moving with difficulty with her dress between the weeds and mud but detonations were calling me back to the scene of a woman fight (and partly fraticida) between the Army (English and Maori aboriginal tribes.The idea of search dominates all the footage: find the true identity, persecuting those who took away you the life, search for a better than the stormy present. While this mix of desires to meet may be interesting, the rhythm to which the director submitted to us arrives at touching the extreme boredom, not to mention the lack of depth profiles of certain key characters in the story.Without entering in repeatable turns and little credible history of love to be built with just data, River Queen, neocelandesa fate of the African Queen, is only right to put a different historical episode in his sights, but suspended to not give it plot fortitude and dress with beautiful and exotic landscapes and childish thoughts about beings condemned to live divided between two cultures. |
2,599 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/938 | Txapulin | Pequeña miss sunshine | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Funny, tender and sometimes devastating with the American way of life. It is worth going to see her to have a good time. | Every year there are some small movie, little, unpretentious and budget with little-known faces that makes a hole in the tastes of the public and critics and has even stuck in several nominations for the oscars. Don't know if it will be the case (I say the oscars), but the truth is that this is a film that may be recommended, as without much enthusiasm but with security that will please everyone.The movie narrates the adventures of an American family in low hours has to take the girl to a beauty contest. This simple plot excuse serves to make us laugh during a little more than an hour and a half of the American way of life based on winners (winners) and losers (losers). All members of this peculiar family are a few losers who will have to learn to live with it and live among them. The type of family and presented satire of the average American family is parallel to which we know about Malcolm or the Simpsons TV series, only that in this movie all have aspirations of winning thwarted.The cast is great, from the father and the mother, which are the best-known (Greg Kinnear and Toni Collette, respectively), until the grandfather druggie (Alan Arkin), uncle gay (Steve Carell) and the silent brother (Paul Dano). But the incredibly excellent is the small star Abigail Breslin, who cries as I have not seen crying other child in the film.In short, a fun movie, tender and sometimes devastating with the American way of life that is worth worth going to see to have a good time. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.